SDR20-74 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
.
Staff Report
� September 19, 1974 .'.,
Se
Agenda Item 4..3
SDR 20-74 (Eckmann Construction)
Site Develop ment Plan Review
For property located at 9035 S. W. Burnham Street.
�� p � � � Site
is located within an M--3, Light Industrial zone. (Tax Map ,
251 2AD, Tax Lot 1600) .
•
Staff Findings ;
1. The staff has. the following concerns related to the sub-
ject proposal for an addition to an existing industrial
building:
o adequacy of parking - need one parking space for each
employee on the largest shift - applicant provides
3
spaces
o clarification of grass area as to "t is to be .
whether ,,
grass or lawn
o maintenance of landscaping -. will water be available
to plants or will they survive periods of drought
Staff Recommendation
Approval of the applicant's site dr telopment and landscape
plan subject to the applicant's satisfying the following
conditions:
1. That the property owner provide parking sufficient to
meet parking requirements set forth in Chapter 18.60.
�x+ n d. yards 2. That the rear an side o f the subject site he land-
soaped with lawn.
•
•
•
• ,O
., nl
•
, .. ..r .4''...,.lv r+t ; ,,y;:a k.�c,r3 .....,., +m.>.. ..:c, .«,,..0 nPw•t.,.:,.,a..4.ar.,,.t..: .Yi u.� ....,,.,im.,„i,..,u.,.F....a..,.,7a,. ., „,kU,•. w+A w.x.
a
•
MINUTES
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIE\AT BOARD }'
•
Regular Meeting, September 19, 1974
Twala.ty Junior High School lecture room
14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
1. C ALL f0 ORDER
R
A. The meeting was called to order at 4:08 p.m.g p {,
2. ROLL CALL
•
A. Regular'�nembe,rs Ed,in, Cook, Bartel, McMonagle and alternate
member Whittaker were present.
3. APPROVAL
-
APPRO OF MINUTES•
A. The minutes of the August 2.2, 1974, regular meeting wire '
approved as submitted.
4. SITE DESIGN REVIEW
SDR 18-74 (Ralph J Peters)
•
A request by Ralph J. Peters for review of a new office facility
located on the southwesterly corner of the intersection=sect of S. W. ,
Main Street and Tigard Street. Site comprises approximately 8200
sq. ft. and is located within a C-3, General Commercial zone.
(Tax Map '2S1 2AB, Tax Lot 3500) .
A. Site Development Plan Review .
.;. I.. • .
1. The staff presented the e. staff findings as stated in the
staff report of September 19, 1974.
2. There was general discussion among the Design Review
ing the following items:
Board members concern
o separation of the parking lot from the Transamerica
p . Building parking lot
o location of hose bibbs
o reason for the non-continuation of the planting strip
behind the building
�
3. Staff stated that the planting strip was not continued
in order to leave room for maneuvering within the parking
space immediately y adjacent the southwesterly property
line
SDR Minutes September 190 1974 page 1
''
4. Cook questioned the staff about the front setback.
B?. ooks stated that a variance approval from the
] ;fanning Commission had been received to vary the
front yard setback from 10 feet to 4 feet.
5. Cook moved to approve the applicant's site development
and landscape plan with the condition that the City
Public Works Department approve a storm drainage plan
for the subject site.
6. Whittaker seconded the motion and the motion passed ;
by unanimous vote of those members present. + .4
B. Architectural Design Review
,
1. Clarence Nicoll., representing Ralph J. Peters, made ,
a short presentation tion of the bric,kp,mmaterial to be
used for the exterior and interior of the building.
2. Whittaker asked if- the downspouts were to drain onto
rt splash blocks or into a storm drain system. Charlotte
Olson, representing Ralph J. Peters, stated that the'
downspouts would drain into the storm drain. system.
3. Cook asked if exterior lighting would be provided on
the site. Ms. Olson stated that the only exterior
lighting would be adjacent the entrance.
Olson stated that all expos
4. Ms.
Ol exposed walls were to be
brick as presented by Mr. Nicoli.
5. There was a general discussion of the adequacy of the
brick for firewall separation in the entrance area
as the entrance area was closely related to the ad-
jacent Transamerica Building.
6. McMonagle moved for approval of the architectural
plans, said approval subject to the use of the
materials and colors submitted by the applicant.
7. Edin seconded end the motion passed by unanimous .
vote of those members present.
4.2 SDI. 19-74 (Trend Leasing Co. )
A request by Trend Leasing Co of Portland, Oregon, for review .
facility located at 11611 S. W. Pacific Highway of an office and parking area for truck and auto leasing
�y Pacific Hig w y between the
Mr. Steak Restaurant and the Fred Meyer Shopping Center. Site ,.
4r
comprises the front portion of tax lot as zoned C-3, General 1
Commercial. (Tax Map 18l 36DB, Tax Lot 501,)
A. Site Development Plan Review {,
1. No person was prr sent representing Trend Leasing Co.
SL R Minutes es � September 19, 1974 *
page 2
;/, •
2. General ral discussion i
s iO
n ensued regarding t e adequacy Y of
A
r
the submit ted site Plan p related to access and egress
and adequacy of storage area for trucks;` the visual :
separation between a truck leasing operation, and a
restaurant and other miscellaneous items. t .
3. Edin moved to deny the site development plan as submitted.
., ` 4. McMonagle asked that the motion be amended to include the
reasons for denial, those reasons being as .follows:
o that the ingress and egress from the site should be
designed to prevent direct left hand turns exiting
the site; the applicant is' requested to submit a
sketch of the relation between the adjacent traffic . . ,
island and the ,entrance to. the subject site
0 applicant should indicate location of truck and equip-
ment storage area, location of accessory equipment i
storage such as hand, trucks, furniture blarkets,
trailer hitches, etc. and the location of any gas
pumps
o the Design Review Board desires an explanation of the
business operation ,.
o the applicant should explain the need for access be-
tween the subject site and the Mr. Steak Restaurant;
the Design Review Board requests a letter from Mr.
Steak Restaurant regarding joint access from said
restaurant to subject site
o the applicant should consider visual screening between
the Mr. Steak Restaurant and the subject site
5. Edin accepted the amendments as Proposed by McMonagle.
Cook seconded the motion as amended and the amended motion
passed by unanimous vote of all those members present.
•
4.3 SDR 20-74 (Eckmann Construction)
A request by Eckmann Construction Co. for review of a proposed •
'
Site is to an existing building located at 9035 S. W. Burnham.
S ' located within an M-3, Li ht.•'In.dustrial zone.on to
adds �- 1 ` within �-�; g � p e. Tax ,
Map 251 2AD, Tax Lot 1600) .
A. Site Development Plan Review
1. The staff presented staff f inrr.in s as stated In the
� p g stat
staff report of September 190 1974.
2. Brooks explained the relation.ship of land ownership
to the access easement providing access to subject
Property.
SDR Minu tes Se tember 19) 1974 p a c
3
n • H � .. . i". .. 1 I +T.. nh n. .w n..ily .,e 1 uenvu,w a arNn•h. 0 .,,M ,, yt.., :k U.ir u..OL"w.l '
o �++nn*41m mee•xIYWCGTL.'s5."A•vn,V:r[•
` a
«'
t
1 t
�. The ],
era
g n R eview Board discussed delaying the '1i
,
decision based on the quality of the applicant's .
,rr
submission.
,
4 Whittaker move
d to approve the applicant's site
. `
develoment and landscape e plans
p p pr s subject to the c,
satisfaction of the following conditions:
p be paved and strip ed City
a) that parkngProposed p p
standards"
b) that the rear and side yards be planted in lawn
i irrigation be approved by the
and facilities for irr g �'..,
staff
c) therwidth of the north planter be a minimum of
4 feet wide and the south planter 6 feet wide :
south
ou
adjacent the parking space proposed d on. ,the s
side of the existing building
•
5. Ellin seconded the motion and the motion passed by 1,,I)
unanimous vote of those members rese
p ento
B. Architectural Design Review
1. Brooks stated that the proposed addition to the existing
building would be attractive and not offensive to the
neighbors and would essentially portray the same char-
structure.
Iv '
acter as exists with the existing st
g
• 2, Cook moved approval of thee, architectural plans stating
that he felt the staff should require that material
samples be submitted with each application for review. ,
3. McMonagle proposed an amendment to apply a condition
to Cook's motion for approval, said condition being
that the new proposed carry aural A
osed addition cars^ the architectural
character of the existing building.
t g
�.. 4. Cook approved the, amendment as stated by McMona le
Whittaker seconded the motion and the motion passed
b
y unanimous vote of those members present.:.
5. OTHER BUSINESS
A. There was no other business.
ADJOURNMENT ,
i was adjourned at 520 .m.
The meeting p
A. g adjourned,
►SDR, Minutes September 19, 197 • - page 4
, ' �• ,tX r.
'`' 4•
n, �� •