Loading...
SDR18-74 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. 1 .,._it, 1. ,+•,.: -r'. ,� ..v.r ...-.a' .wa.. .,...,Ai1a.L.,,.K�.....4.atYU. .......r.-.i,wr..o..t...,..: _." L..eJ.0„41.E...:+x14 arzl,.rtk u:.ewAl rt..Vr�'NU,.i.A',A,._....Aw.L,w...47f.X tY^-LAS«7 r+ .....iL.. .,..%xC.41t}rY ItY.l 44,,r.M«ila.+l:•tti:,k�.Ir. . +llnt,a,..:�Wu.1�: _r4M,4-,t.ii.l.?k.<lt n Nw.e f ..w.l rv..Ji n:•d...»M1.Ar irJdl., !«."1At i H+�l.,4 «,� 1 1 s ••• 5W Co: n'er' off' Mai 'and Tl9art� 1 i 1 Ip ���„uSl{i 'u 1.” , .t..-rr�. .�} 1 1,. ..,M.:,ea�,"�..«r..........n:a,✓•.�4n.wicL...r r F IptY,t,�f x..•n.,�..iM�.L�.,.»n.ti�m.,l:w„un3«.+wrxr.n:1H...,.,o,n ;Y I , : �. . • I • • r • • 1 , i •• v • • • T i , �+ � *w•µ m ��wwM,rir,a yi u,u anerw:u,,.,.J,uWw ' .'� ,••. 1.,.. I s al..,_ ., i �,.,, w ,I r �r, r • t I j If • ' ' • zl...-..... .. _ . .• J( •. ..,..III,:» .ue..0 t..aJ.,S-:wa«t.%1....n e•f ..4t....M..Y-... .>»/n I-•,....n....f _x,1..J 4-+,r-.L+..,...L7:rr,...-dwa1.,•�, i TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Staff Report ' k:. September 19, 1974 I '. Agenda Item 4.1 SD R 18-74 4 Ra1 p h J Peters) Site Development Plan Review t, • For property located on the southwesterly corner of S. W. •, Main and Tigard Streets. Site comprises approximately 8200 ° within en • sq. feet and. is located �� a C-3, General Commercial • zone. (Tax Map 2S1 2A" , Tax Lot 3500) . Staff Findings g 1. The proposed site and landscaping plans meet the intent, p p aping plan purpose and standards of Title 18, Tigard Municipal Code. 2. A detailed drainage plan should be submitted for approval • by the City Public Works Department so they may be able to determine the adequacy of storm drainage from the sub- �1. y b I sect site. Staff Recommendation . Approval of the submitted site development and landscape plans ' subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions: o That City Public Works Department approve Ia storm drainage e p lan.. • • • • • • III • I{{ I1 { I li • • f i • L •-, , Y6 6 CHARLES J . McCLURE �- Er 18 1974 ATTORNEY AT LAW • , 12425 S.W.'MAIN STREET CITY OF 1 IGARD TIGARD,OREGON 97223 TELE'PNb1ll(503)639,410$ , be e L' S e 1�n p r 16 1974 r Site Development Plan ' a & Design Review Board City of 7.a.gar d . Tigard- Oregon 97223. a Re: Plans for Proposed Office Building of Ralph �. ,Peters to be constructed on Southwest Main Street across from Tigard City Hall • Gentlemen: This is to advise the Board that I will be the next door neighbor of the .n ,.� - Street r r } building �vluclz ML,. I�alpl�, Peters roposes to build on Main �Lrec�t and that I am the one who will probably be most affected by the building.' I have reviewed the plans and have consulted with Mr. Peters. In my j opinion the construction of his ,.. p proposed building will. be an improvement to.my m. property e�.ty as well as to Main Street as a whole. - Y .P � Y landscaping o�� �1oor which :l.l. take the `I particularly like the idea of landscaping n w place of a vacant lot, often muddy in the winter, and ringed with noxious weeds. • Very truly yours, • �laarle s J. celure cc: Mr. Ralph Peters • it ' 11, f {j i 1 i �,l I • { ti• a . . • . : ..i .. ,rt.,.ry ••1.• IL'„.x,{d ..:ti.k i.rJ,•-..r JI +IJ.i'.Y. r AN.n:tfat.. m.r la.R4 n ..1 r�•L...P.,If...:.i:+4w,r., .4A[HilJ•`-.i ,ifl, i, , .,c,Le ‘, „1.,:,)iq ii,.,,9y i i:M M....N.... ."gym 4w•a-.✓....• x! l.r.i:--...n,.n..+... rvr.• I:..ti... ;... ...w..f.' .arnr r f . MINUTES T IGARU SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESI GNP REVIEW I EW BOARD . r Regular ar M ee t in g9 September r 19, 1974 . Twenty Junior H i g h School lecture room , 14650 S W 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 11_ , , ar 1. CALL TO ORDER . A. The meeting was called to order at 4:08 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL • A. Regular'members Edina, Cook, Bartel, McMonagle and alternate were present.r .. member p - rr 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES , A. The minutes of the August 22, 1974, regular meeting wire • approved as submitted. 4. SITE DESIGN REVIEW SDR 18-74 (Ralph J. Peters) A request by Ralph J. Peters for review of a new office faclity located on the southwesterly corner of the intersection of S. W. Main Street and Tigard Street. Site comprises approximately 8200 ' Sc!. ft, and is located within a C-3, General Commercial zone. 1 (Tax Map 281 2AB, Tax Lot 3500) A. Site Development Plan Review 1. The staff presented the staff findings as stated in the g ,/ staff report of September 19, 1974. 2, discussion r r I ,f There. was general d�scu.5s�.on among the `Design Review Board members concerning the Following items: ' o separtion of the parking lot from the Transamerica Building, parking lot • o location of hose bibbs o reason for the non-continuation of the planting strip behind the building Ir i • y r continued 3, Staff stated that the planting ,�trar w r ` was not in order to leave room for maneuvering within the parking y adjacent hwesterlyr property space a.mr�edia-te�. ad `acent tb,.e so�.t line. SDR Minutes - September 19, 1974 -' page 1 ,. r I • ♦ ♦ lL _rJ_,....... w>,.l a...1..4.Jh�rrr�..wrY. .r.+..lv:+.a(,IJr-J,. •nI-+I iH_il:.{»._11.rn n>;rx Fl .. ♦11.,.�ph.,.L..:.I! r:..v 1 ' :+,.l.r.._.., a ...'..4:. . .....la. ♦.._. '. .rr ".....♦_I ..:..,..11« ..I-AF rt ..r♦-.... „....r.,.n.., .+.J .1. [J i 4. Cook questioned the staff about the front setback. that a` variance e a roval from the s ' Brooks stated approval Planning Commission had been received to vary the ,' front yard setback from 10 feet to 4 feet. 5. Cook moved to approve the applicant's site development it and landscape >Plan with the condition that the City p approve drainage !; Public Works Department a rove a storm dra e plan g for the subject site: fl 6 Whittaker seconde d the motion and the motion passed s ed by unanimous vote of those members present. B. Architectural Design Review 1, Clarence' Nicoli, representing Ralph J. Peters, made a short presentation of the brick material to be used for the exterior and interior of the building. k asked if the downs outs were to drain 2. Whittaker the �p onto -plash blocks or into a storm drain system. Charlotte Olson, representing Ralph J. Peters, stated that the downspouts would drain into the storm drain system. 3. Co ok asked d if exterior lighting would be provided on stated that the only exterior the site. Ms. Olson scat y er�'nor lighting would be adjacent the entrance. 4 Ms. Olson stated that all exposed walls were to be brick as presented by Mr. Nicoli. s �_ of 5. There was a general discussion off' the adequacy of the brick for firewall separation entrance area bi�.,cr in the as the entrance area was closely related to the ad- jacent Transamerica Building. , 6. McMona g 1 e moved for a p proval of the architectural ral plans, said approval subject to the use of the •materials and colors submitted by the applicant. 7 Odin secon ded and the motion passed d by unanimous s r vote of those members present. 41' 4.2 SDR 19-74 (Trend Leasing Co. ) A request b:. Trend Leasing do. of Portland, Oregon, for review parking area for t of axq�. office and truck and auto leasing g � facility located. at 11611 S. W. Pacific is highway between the Shopping r Steak R f aszo Center. Site , M, Restaurant and the Meyer del e� ned C-3 G�Nnera�. comprises the front portion of 9 commercial. (Tax Map 1S1 56DB) Tax Lot 501) . A. Site De�r ela me nt Plan Review ntin Trend Leasing Co.' '.. 1. No person was present representing g g SDR Minutes - September 19, 1974 page 2 • ♦ ..err,,o♦.., a .......... ... .a ., li r,ry , a .ar. .Lr uv,r en...cw . - r n«.•r„w♦.w.n rr...,rr. r»n. rn::...” .. „vwra x.n.r.t..x• vY I.Iir"Sll{. ..w, .,n .... .eN .r ..n In 'aN 1 .J I. 4 1 ..,AI'. ♦Jv..l.-.. H..,.t».r..» ...I,..Ykl..„.t:;nr..:a.....a.a..-61..,,..l,+w... ....as✓.,M..ae: w ..+ y. .,d.w.u.,.na:t•.++.,,..a,a:>4KS:....i7:Y..t1,a r : i 2. General discussion ensued regarding the adequacy of the submitted site plan related to access and egress and adequacy of storage area for trucks, the visual separation between a truck leaping operation and a restaurant and other miscellanous items, • 3. Edin moved to deny the site development plan as submitted. 4. McMonagle asked that the motion be amended to include.the reasons for denial, those reasons being as follows: o that the ingress and egress from the site should be designed to prevent direct left hand turns exiting the site; the applicant is requested to submit a sketch of the relation between the adjacent traffic island and the entrance to the subject site o applicant should indicate location of truck and equip- . rent storage area; location of accessory equipment " storage such as hand trucks furniture blankets, • trailer hitches, etc., and the location of any gas pumps o the Design Review Board desires an explanation of the business operation o the applicant should explain the need for access be- . tween the subject site and the Mr. Steak Restaurant; , the Design. Review Board requests a letter from Mr. • Steak Restaurant regarding joint access from said restaurant to subject site o the applicant should consider visual screening between the Mr. Steak Restaurant and the subject site ' • 5. Edin accepted the amendments as proposed by McMonale. g Cook seconded the motion as amended and the amended motion passed by unanimous vote of all those members present. 4.3 SDR 20-74 (Eckmann Construction) q, by Construction Co. review of a proposed A request b Eckmann Co for re - addition an existing building located at 9035 S. W. Burnham. ' Site is located i ddi-L�oz�: to g �; ��. ht:'zndti� aced within an M s-tral zone. (Tax g g_ Map 251 2AD, Tax Lot 1600) . r A. Site Development Plan Review 1. The staff.presented staff findings as stated in the staff report of September 19, 1974. 2. Brooks explained' the relationship of land ownership to, the access easement providing access to subject ' property. SDR S Minutes - September l . e tember 1974 -� p a � �� 97 3. The Design Review Board discussed delaying the decision based on the quality of the applicant's submission. r' 4. Whittaker moved to approve the applicant's site development and landscape plans subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions: a) that parking proposed be paved and striped City standards , b) that rear and side yards be planted in lawn and facilities for irrigation be approved by the staff c) the width of the north planter be a minimum of Planter 6 feet wide l south _4 feet wide and the _ w adjacent the parking space proposed on the south side of the existing building 5. Edin seconded the motion and the motion passed by unanimous vote of those members Present; A B d Architectural Design g n Review 1. Brooks stated that the proposed addition to the existing building would be attractive and not offensive to the neighbors and would essentially portray the same char- acter as exists with the existing structure f , • 2. Cook moved approval of the architectural plans stating that he felt the staff should ';require that material samples be submitted with each application for review. 3. McHonagle ;proposed an amendment to apply a condition to Cook's motion for approval; said condition being that the new proposed addition carry the architectural character of the existing "building. <, 4. Cook a pp roved the amendment aS stated by ML cMonG.gle. Whittaker seconded the moon and the motion p rise d by unanimous vote of those members present. 1 5. OTHER BUSINESS A. There was no other business. 6° ADJOURNMENT • A. The meeting was adjourned at 5:20 p.m. SDR. Minutes September, l9 1974 page 4 • • I t • 1 ,a.r y,. !,,,, tiv -'.q,t,4+r .:::; `M:in.,�I, ,, , , ,K ''.. R 1 .,+F :14.",t; t ` .`:',,,�4"y','. t -., ,".1,40t.4.17"C. gdjr4+.°n}.,j ' .:. �.f 044''' �y a',C ''' °�1 1` 1pi•''''4 1rAltII d '',.',4.1•1 ti r , 7I d " ; YU) ,a !° +" ,�p>v l,i:, t .' y1 ���&,yyyr try'■ " ; 1. • i- - f 1 ulf�j,illy*Ij'1'r0, Y'Cr'44 4,„. C '`yr” I C Il 1 ' ,. , 4 M, Y+N.tA14 Fµ"44'X' ' ;M"rt pit;j+Y'»,il�".'�y,`,r'{i�lr1' It '0 `r ' a M "�.Yk +I^ .,yIIN0 ,�,'r 'l y'„ P �p^i�1y tY�l `t1. v ' tr Y 4 Y v}lfjj'!` i yr ,'r h,:,,,r,y� ,4,„(1., '.,,I " 1»l y 1, 4 ��,� y tVS' ;� r. `T7'+�gbti, t +�' ,.., OLSON! DESIGNS INC �, ;i r ,4 t ' i� ,4. , 1�wp. �, `...."�.` ,, �' +t �,.. 1 '4 '�'I, ,. f t r pa iv.�cr`a°1`,1,4}jY,',4 14345 SOUTHWEST PACIFIC HIGHWAY �,w GERALD41 OLISON. 4 *4; 4,� Ty) CANTERBURY SQUARE CHAR,l.,f3TTEF�`'c6,k4S N l es n00 tip' . TIGARD,OREGON 97223 q�, `kv iw' t'�� k �i ,tir;',0,1ti tiyli ll; ` PHONE: 639-0513 .{ {'. + 1 u„„�''!;i»,.4r.A,,,� ;;1 t .i,q,}s‘I,, 1, art"any ,,C,1'� 41.'41 ,, y , f,•is''''',1,,,,,,,6",,1 „", y 4,-1 1, • y Spet ember 19 i,= 1074)4,,"r� ,. 4'.°';',''. ',1,1' ,rl 4 i'I 1Y1 .� i(i° 4w, Y", '( ti1A `ley, Member.; of Th 3 Un FF'v1,o Board � C1.ty of Tie, :'"C7 , b; "41 4 4 P 01,14 r'-' �Y` C i ty lio 1.:1 97223 A c ,,f r y i "1ry�" yt ''' Tigard, Off'"�cr 4 r q4h k Wl +iAii, . ,r. 1 ai i +:, �, d� "+"' 1 to ,,. » + 14f Dear 31.,rF, sa 'i eg �'.i f' t i."ah �� :i r. of °':,1-1(? 11.1.;'1.ding Proposed"by "k,, `' y,�i r.� F �.r. , n� �1�c r• � �:�` car c`u:l.r, c� ,. • �,f r Mr. Ralph J. r,•y.,ers 'to �, built G,t the co..n:.Ar: c,f S W Main. S rent ,� , ,, ,,� t* • and TA�..rd ttvw`.,y. ,� ,, ,,'..,,, .'L•i t or 14t�.11 i;.ii], be va.;L'.1" ,+a,t r?, rir,,d 1.uin to 1 ight brown {i ,,, •• brie ,,, L,. ldindo l>rr w i�l 1 h a,�% 1,,Jr()r,L�,etone altitn ir'.ium ya,c>h with very. , *„,. dark 1,,0°)wii trim a.r11 b.ig,..', .1_,ari .1e over their w 4.0° ,' I Nip,. ,, IM t ,� �, •1, y 141. M it °1,., ThF Fawill 1 k t r-s 3.,." :itk .a.d,,, be ve.,, r3d,?k. brc,vms , • , The rc0f' 1-i .1.1 bo ra,lrli uri to dark b■ru;wtr (.1orn 1)08,ition shingl,e,s`;a�,* .l4. o,ti The e),bA4,a';1 c,xr ,.I.c _+ 1,1.1.11 be o.i't,hur ?Gass ur O:1 id core wood" 10° , i ., C l)i 3:i'1'IJ G a. ri,.1':'4`l;y o.r'�:t t. ;.o ,,,e. , t,Y L',t,, , a • • ` di' , '',,alt t .y ° ,^r a 4 , y ' • t �+a ricerly, 0. °o;,1 .,Ly ,,. 4215 BISQUE A' y.� f 4 '�,. I'';l', n , 1rvfT.r/Jl 4 ,4tf, ,, �,a ' '' P � � Np, + Ir i '' ,f ll r ,:.I V .� ..ML .ya . e 4 4 I.d�• ,flip Y, uy t :,:, It CH '1 AR D ' , � ' i'' 4,s.„h ,, U 4303 ANTI UE BROV.'N *, '.,,,,'4,.1,..o.c ••T•tWi,, .: '1 [[aft$” � ' ►�18G,N.�` ,��'i4'f��' » . , � r > " ' a i l"a , l Y 1 'X41+ ■ � ,„ , ' . ,, p'I Ka, i 1 4+,'t„'.•:', -'s'4'4-, fi a y1 V f r t ”' ) u 'r. ',,',.,',,,',',;,::,,..1,, i # �i , a:b', ;y'rt��,»y» i�' ' f II � + 1, ,,A , yr ! F 7r f � 14 t I„ fit r e r, , ,q i 1' i It '4,S414, h Yr M�,Nhi, tin�':,',':4 �,qty.�, y , ',.' Nr011 s , r,, !,l i r , r r r ;i t rr',!r ry,))'4,%)` t i Is f�t It ■, ti ( aC",r;t ,'X�I',0%I'.' , , , y, i '� 1 4 1�. ii''� � .M�'1 Ir t d A 1 1 Y3.; ' r r f ' yC`r' 1 I I y a C rC , yi ,,,,I.,:, 1 1+ . 11�j�73„,'1J '' tdi ,',:''..ri,�.x.., �,;,: . ,.3 i ,.S,X•I,Y' 1 Ya a O 1•l� (i YhUr j!�'"g'.r;%, 1, 41ra7 INbIAN SUMMER * , a ryPy ,F' ��1 u�u{p �, � r� ,� n Y' y,.N a,�yw� ` ir71 M''y �` �� �"� 1,,,,,' �C 9 � '4, , f ' , u ,�' rip`HEY }. , a A of fr rk k {j iu `^ ,+ uy ,^ ,. w 4r y�j , La PY. w� k M .0 ,r yYEIMa►:Y"'gy,,�rr4M f Y... rt. r 5r� t IM '1 +n. , , . ...... , dlC 1M1 1, , . , ( . . .. , , . .. , . \ . —41s P .I M..«n,r.,,,,.,...........+,_.+... .,.<..«.,... ,ux.:u.w.-«w,....r,v wir.w_..N....k.ut,..,?a,uaJ..-.J..rrni.,.....44,u-...A«.r•.a..k J-rr..ss.:.w,t.,..«J.V.xL.w..xMtx..«.K+r-..H.x..,.a. ,«,.rFWx .:tAIM. ..kC.n.,x.rh,n+..N o.LL4wrir JINN...,..-m`fir,e.,.�0.I(A.SiwVMA7+M'+^iri1Al.. . .w,.N_. ♦NW aFV.>n..a.au,WrGWS:+iA4,.4,IF'...n w4I JY- ..t . ..'. spitz,' lqr '`" FIE CHARLES J. McC LU•RE SEP is 1974 ATTORNEY AT LAW 12425 S.W.MA114 STREET CITY Of TIGARD TIGAR.b,OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE(503)63904108 S e to t-ri be r 16 1974 Site Development v eto ncnt PIa n e e Board 8t Design Review n g City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Plans for p o s e d O 'ce Building lding... of Ralph Peters to be constructed on S o uthw es t Main ' . Street across from Tigard City Hall Gentlemen: , a This is to advise the Board that I will be the next door neighbor. of the • building which Mr. Ralph Peters proposes to build on Main Street, and that I am the one who will probably be most affected by the building,' I have reviewed the plans and have consulted with Mr. Peters. In my p' construction of his proposed building will be an improvement opinion the construct ' ,Y p opexty as well as to Main Street as a whole. I particularly like the to r whale , p g the place. ^ will take ze lot, often mudd y in t he winter,next and©in ed with noxious weeds. i ring ea� vacant of av • Ver y truly your 8, a yy • Charles J. cClt..tx w,' cMt • cc: Wit.` Ralph Peters r . � r [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]