SDR5-73 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
If '
•
is
.•.ry u ,.!t, a.wr,
�,v µ„ n d+w,....ur,,n, ,.�w.},.rr.�, r v„w,�..',.,. ,' . ,, i r .,'i '1.•,'•:':,:',1•‘...'''',:.,'''..,1,' rf. ,.,. ,� r „-�7r ,r.'.•f! «a.,w.�.,,.-Itt+„1.u^�M+.-„..eaRJhre«,++n,Mfkrr.a wlw, w,G,ct, ."a—a1. w, F w, "}:.:
• I .+.w w4.",,V4.,r,.l,ra,..N.—u.,,.M,�.J.11 �r «M, F y,l-.a u,k�l.�•...f„µ•a'i,.wrHA HI:y�+AaAr�d���jlGl,Nl M#.rw+N..a.sr�wc"q,�.,�,.,,N��414;..Nr.«:t,.a..�,:.,..«MM«.�,+e.;i.X»I*1f�r.w Me.rrl>a.l.,r,#�r(�f:�„)I+.ia.�, ,
,I a'f`t"_ "+”-.'F
M o ; '�IG. � . WM'lr ,�' il°' :',',;.,,,,;,,,,,r,:,,;,,,',,,,,-,,,',..,,, ; 'I tr"t.
• ,r'I 'Y Bit 1Dev,, pi ent Review (S1'�R 5 73 r
,, T'L d I Avenue r r , :1■
L,
},Ir4;,iP i�s ` :,r 4i a ,p : r �`1,i k`
•' ', .. ,M;' r r'- r r 1, X11!I lw)I r ,, iw r t -tx
` ' ,I• , ,4 .,i w :w• uMrwr trZ.' i r.w wa».s. da s...w. i4,n ,y M.� H.w C
•
•
n
• ‘,...4itill 1 , , , , ,
.
I,
•
F' fib.
I 1
r
0
n
•
'® I
4
fw
i
es ,•
•
,
o
u '
'1111
•
t
.
..
•
6
� ly ,
Pi`s
• is
i
,
r
K !
P
, , + _
,.ar:e,u:L.,.,r,—.•.......w,. »a .. ,.ut—.=,.-,U:.n.w..,4...r: .•.W,c, A,.—u»:
• CONTRACT STATUS REPORT THE /ETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
•• 1 a 1 Hartford, Connecticut 06115
UFE&CASUALTY
' I
Date this otiee Mailed
Se '�en1bGr 1975
N e
w ,
II
SEP 81975
OE
1220 Maw
T;i.gard, ;Oregon
L J
Bond No. )1,2 SB 10996 BOA, Amount of Bond$ _, 21,000. Date of Bond 6.27-73
Name of Principal E. A. `Gray $& Co.
• Address T y r egoxl
Description of.,, r � �,�, ,�, g � e II of '��.F�:'d•_Tnd�.t��,r�.a�,_.pe�`�:. . .
f Caiittaot `t7,dec �.�'�. �ia�
,,
According to our records, contract for which above bond was given should be completed about
. Kindly furnish particulars indicated below.
ADDRESS YOUR REPLY ON THIS SHEET TO Yours truly, I
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO, THE /ETNA CASUALTY AND' SURETY COMPANY
• 3,,01, q tint 19th Avr=• k
PORTLAND, ORE ON 97205. " y
111f1C LAC ) 226 772 t 8 �i�'
y V ic1i Nicholson Attorney-in-Fact
PARTICULARS REQUESTED
Original Contract Price , , . , M $
Additions to Contract . . . . . ,
Total $
Deductions from Contract , , , , , , . , r . , , $
Total Contract Price$
Payments received to date , , ,
Earned Estimates due , ,
Retained Percentage Withheld , . , . . . , , ,$ Total $ •
Amount of Contract Uncompleted $ I
. r If Contract Not Completed, probable date of Completion is - _ II "t
I I
' If Contract Completed, please state Date of Acceptatice .
•
, , Remarks
ar�" ' Data, , 19 , Slgnatllre,�,_
� 4! aAr •
, i.3d 9a
F14 +ri
,1m1�3 ICJ d , FIi�YN't't~'b' FJ U 5, ,
!a
,
A
,
a
y;
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Staff Report
April 4, 1974
Agenda Item 3.2
SDR 6_74 (R. A. Gray & company)
Site Development plan Review
, For property located et 9920 S.W. Tigard Street, within the Tigard
Industrial r 1 Pa c & �s zoned M-4, 1 ndus t r a 1 Park.
Staff Findjns
g' Commission, April 2, approve .
Planning Commission on A ril 2 1974, took action to a
1. ,
The rove a side
and variance to 20 feet from a required 50 feet.
. 2. The site is adjacent an R-7, Single Family Residential zone.
F
l
3. The Planning Commission, on April 2, 61974, took action to approve
a concept plan of the subject site. Said concept plan was to Partially
fulfill a condition of city ordinance No. 72.31 (See attached staff report.)
4. Pertinent sections of the Tigard Municipal Code are as follows: ,
. Section l& 5.2.070 La.ndscapxXi . (a) Properties abutting a residential zone
shall Provide and maintain an evergreen landsca p e buffet, according to the
plot
plan and approved by the Planning Commission.
(b) Yards adjacent to streets and those abutting a residential zone shall
provide lawn and trees and/or shrubs and shall be maintained in a manner providing
a Park-like character to the property.
Section 18.38.080 Landsca.p.ing & Screening - N C 2 1 4'-3 & M-4 zones. Landscaping
ng
& screening for M-2, M-3 & M-4 zones shall be as follows: '
(2) All areas not occupied by paved roadway, structures or walkways shall be
Y
or a combination of any of the following: y . include any
� landscaped. A minimum of the front 20 feet shall be landscaped to
y g. Ia�an, evergreen or deciduous trees
or shrubs, perenial or annual flowers.
Section,18,60.1.40 Loadin bertl s. Buildings or structures 'to be built or
y altered which receive ive an,d distribute material of merchandise by
truck shall rovide and maintain off-street loading berths iii sufficient numbers
p g
and size to adequately handle the needs of the particular use. If the Loading
space has been provided in connection with an existing Use or is added to an
existing use, the loading space shall not be eliminated if elimination would
' ;• result in less space than is required to adequately handle txie neeu;, of the
{ particular use. Off-street parking areas used to fulfill the requirements of
this title shall not be used for loading and unloading operations except
.,
during periods of the day when not required to take care of parking
needs.
•
Section 18.60. 180 Bumper rails and curbs. Parking spaces along the
boundaries of a parking lot shall be provided with a bumper rail or a
curb at least four inches high located four feet within the property lines
. .. n ,
1 1 L I 4
0
•
M
•
, I
y '
d( rr_7.,:k. ,:��,..::m+ .u.,.'a., ,-,......-..«. :.-,+.:...,M.,I.. ti., .,,-..+.,..:a+u_k.�::ik.r,.a...u,..m .iF.. y.» n,..*r..,. .»i:,.,.- ..r,.4:M rw,..r.« «..i..rw.,.•.ya.,j•
' I +
•
PAGE 2 - STAFF REPORT Design Review Board
• Agenda Item 3.2 (R. ' A, Gray & Company)
, ( Section 18,60.200 When fence, required. boundary of a parking
lot adjoins When the boa
.� strut, such parking lot shall be screened by
residential di
ns a xesi
a sight obscuring fence, as prescribed by Section 18.12.080.
Section 18.12.080 Enclosure & Screenin Re aired (b). Parking lot to be .
y ing the site of normal adjacent pedestrian
screened b a fence obscu� � �
vehicul,.ar traffic and/,or by landscaping of such height '& density as may be
prescribed by the Planning Commission."
LI
5. The applicant's
submitted te ed landscape plan does not reflect a 20 i oot landscaped
front yard.
•
n 6. The applicant's submitted site & landscape plan do not indicate adequate aisle
ha,'
width for vehicle movement within the parking area on the Tigard Street side
of the proposed structure. Potential conflicts betweer delivery trucks and
autos should be considered.
- I
•> 7. The "E"English Ivy"
ground cover shown on the landscaping ng plan is spaced at •,
• I
36 inches on center. Recommended spacing is 18 inches for root cuttings
and 24 clinches for pots.
8. The landscape plan indicates a variety of 26 small shrubs to be placed in
the front 20 foot landscaped front yat'd with 8 plum trees. A considerable
, distance will occur between these shrubs within the front 20 feet. No
ground cover treatment is shown *ithin this area.
Staff Recommendation
Approval subject to the applicant meeting the following conditions:
Aa The applicant shall submit revised site & landscape plans of the su bject i
te for •
, Plannin g staff approval. Said site & landscape plan shall be approved by the
Planning Staff on the following bases:
I ,I
n lish Ivy ground cover shale. be spaced
1. , That all E � at 18 inches on ,enter
g vy g
p
for root currings o
' g or 24 inches.nches; Ian center for pots. I I
I '
2. That the landscaped front 20 feet contain a greater ier e ensity of shrubs
and ground cover treatment be indicated acceptable to the Planning staff:
3. That the landscape plan indicate the true location of the proposed structure
and''the true dimension of the landscaped front 20 feet,
4. That the parking tot adjacent S,W. Tigard Street be rearranged to allow for
the safe maneuvering of vehicles & provide for a minimum 24 foot aisle for
access and egress to parking spaces.
L _
Be A Storm Drainage plan of the subject site shall be subject to the apprdval
of the City Public Works Department:'
I I
I I ,
I ,
• I
I ,
•
," rJ
e+ +.,.r�rw°'7rikk•r, nh 'e"`M""'
� � ,i,.� ,, x`,y, SDR 6-74 (R. A. Gray & Company) �,:
e 'e A request by R. A. Gray & Co
y mean for a review of a warehouse •
�' e s truc tore ll
to be located within the Tigard Industrial Park at 9920 S.W. Tigard
' Street. The site is located within an M-4, Industrial Park zone. 1
(Tax Map 2S1 2BA, Tax Lot 300)
Site Development flan,
and concerns as stated in the staff report.
,. Thy,. staff related. staff findings p
A general discussion of the project then followed.' p .� lowed, general discussion .
ti staff report.The
inea'
„
question of garbage .p addition, the was related to the items addressed in the sta
q g age col lec tion was addressed by Mr. Whittaker. The question
of exterior lighting was discussed as well as the spacing of the ivy ground
1 covet as proposed by, the applicant and
t related to traffic pp parking° goes Lions as t
., access and requirements. The s taf the. structure
the ' ' '
further discussion followed concerning the stay th
, i �� staff recommendation and. f�a�rt discussion staff
'
recocixnend tion. G7hi ttake 8
r theta moved to approve the site plan as submitted
• with the condition that the applicant provide a 65 foot setback from the
„ right-of-way line of S.W. Tigard Avenue. Cook s�
the mss ti on and the
' ( vote was unanimous for Whittaker's motion,
�. g seconded
Design Review
A, The applicant explained the structure and that the architectural style had
u
been changed from the existing buildings so as to match the character of the
Deli n Review g rear of the property.
'r, future pole office Board at the
;,, ev e ► $
g members materials "re
g La Led to, i;he
'" ,,;k proposed face of the building adjacent the. residential side of the ro osed structure.
The applicant plan exposed aggregate building
1 agreed to revise his lan to include an ex osd a
: fate on the side of the structure facing the residential area and to also .
carry the existing g i
facia around the east end ,,►
°� � residential area to provide a uniform character around the building*
,entire b�nil.d
There was a general discussion involving the lighting of the building add
�. ; the signing of the individual building 'spaces. Whittaker stated that he
felt that the main object of the Design Review board was to define
objectionable features and that the view from the public tight-of-way was
, ; a major jor factor. McHonagle expressed concern about drainage from the
U,
% ' downspouts into storm drains. The applicant stated that the subject att'ucka re's
M directly discussion occurred
mechanical equipment on the roof. but feet that it o
g drain directl. into storm drains: �'t�rther discuss
r �, placed far r _:. would be
p enough to ser'een any such mechanical
sa applicant Y i.ca1 equipment, Cook suggested
submit a cut sheet to the staff if mechanical equipment is
, t. sufficiently'tabove parapet height. it ' .
� t be accepted as shown approving Wh ta,kex` then moved that the building
p pproving d
P
,:, of t ,
g he applicant°;� chatage.,�i•n his plan to include
.` exposed aggregate and d t yp is
al building facia on the eastern 4 ide of the
,
building d, a c ett th e single
family residential area Kelting
vote Las unanimous in favor of Whittaker,s mot1on,conded the
I.
motion and the
,
3. The meeting was formally adjourned at L0t5i P.M. 4
r gi p: 4. After the formal meeting, there eras informal discussion concerning the ability
of the 12111B to speed up the de vision making p rocess regarding each case.
It was
suggested that a work session be held prior to each ARB meeting to discuss formally Review ch project in detail It was also suggested member of '
detail.perhaps �u Y es Led that each,�uemb
- to his technical
• . l
specialty such as engineering or architectural cons� eration'
Y engineering s. , The length of
..
'
f reports was also discus s ed� It t was sugg ested t.
hat the
staff Mark their concerns directly on the pla n and cause an� ordinance reference made oy secti on'oa.
r
number �rithdtkt actually stating the specific ordinance in the staff report. ''
a i
,I
I ,I
,
y..i,,, v.i.�.�.,_; .,u..i-� - . .,W i.i::�.,.wr w.,,u.�x .x.,,-. ,...:_:.an.�«.4..:.:.,1�.:i;...,,.-Ir+. .,.a.a:....�.-....-..ia,��A�e.4:u-Iw x4.xl.l.,+.�w...1:..._«1 4 .. .w .. .. ,.A� ..r • i �..fl
... ,_.-r. .:. , ;..«-M1.+.,...M i.a t:-titi M .m a. ,,,.k a,.r.:L.+F ♦.aar,L7�,�. .1a•a.y.;Ll - ,..�:::. ,`.
UJ
i I
1
x
.
• • ‘., ,, '', ' ' ' '. '' , , , :,,, ' ' '' , H.''.H'. , . '' : ' ' . . ,. ,, ' Lk.,,,ii.‘.,••• 'r?1.1,1J),,,),i)j,,' ' 1.''', ' ' , ' ' ' .'.
a
\ n
i
1� I
y
t-r
c C
r � �
lam"
•
,
Jf P
I
I,
\ ,
VIRST STATE LIIIMK iji:'OREG H
n
I ;
• .,
1
'
,
,.
1
i
:
Q U 6 • F
'
n ,
•