Loading...
SDR21-73A POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. y iyM • b w JAI ' ,'.. .. -„ . :'..-,,,,,,-.1,,,;,,,, .4.:":Ir X...NMr„r.�AL,4Wi,4V.•,,,,:.M.«V-w ..�.rt n 4.I.PA•,l.r!•..«,IWnK,..ri.el.,«$_ (1•rvi' „,• _ '.�J,'Mn.4.+..t,..wlY.l1«.w..i.I......Ne.Gn.,:,:A ...1.»....X- ..:1,...n0. .i t:'ul.'. �a _uwe.4.. ..u.-r... u�.. ,,,,,,,.r-..4.1".,,,.3,,,„.,4,,,,,,,,4,,,,,--t",,,,,,,•••••W+ �1,,,,.� r rl . ,'.;' t're..M.., �'M• '1 4 I TIVAPD •'fA••�E"� E$'. STR C.d / ' '! 1v / , � e' , $i`f a ,D4 -1 pfnei�' I1 evi N.,/,',(SDR 2`1' 73A 'f I 1 I ' .'; r+eW. ula • aW, Can et b y I'axle;l bete, ee =f 1Q3r e.r.:... ul n4 ( ,1, ;st a..� Tl�wii����.�Yautu,R�u�,.rWwb.uvlkko.iiA;Agi,Mp e 1Y,41 .4.t,.ia.,;,i,w,l.,..,..w•..,u..:—..,...,....1..,,,, .,'1.—�F ...u4...,,, �Mi n n . , I r I II I • I , I , I , ,ti I ' I I I • r', • , I ; i. I I • • I n I 1� I ,1 �I• M1 1 {Q I 1 - • y 1 ', , ,, 1, i r''7� ' , .p , y r m JI • • • I 4.1 .,.. _„k..,.V. ,�..0-.�...IC...�-„wa.....v:w,..,..wa..a_:,—�»-.0 -...ti...+,.,-n_�ti;/N.�1..�... .-:,...s,«.w+;,u. Na....t.e.:x::;�dcr..t:.r' .a ,,...,... ..r..�_w-...r'_�.” �. .� .......' .;,.�.. .±�....... hN»ru.._.fWrwdtFw.Hix.Jx .k�ibWrak 4 ' � + `A� ,�{eX+k W rf,C"v,xYu.nt,�xiA h.k v,1FM k.X� Af 47r. aVY(YmY.h 1t�/ »way..+p.'+u4c me tiny the '(% ' chalienge. . . - •. . . . , . . ii . ', .-t ' ' '‘ \ PRESBYTERIAN 41. ., .r i CHURCH - �-- ,� f the 103rd'& S,W. CANTERGIURY LANE sx, ,,vl. 0f' church TIGARD OREGON 97223 i 74^ V , ', the TELEPHONE 639.3273 hill `Iw, 'y ; "Y' CITY OF TIGARD • August 13, 1974 City of Tigard ' Building Department 12420 S.W. Main . . 'y Tigard, Ore. 97223 tl • Oen emen. , • I understand that, there is a complaint against the Tigard Water District for expanding their facilitiLs on Canterbury Lane between S.W. 104th and 106th. . My home is located next to the Water District property at 10380 S.W. Canterbury' Lane. We have no complaint against the Water District. The noise level • does not disturb us at any time of the day. They have maintained a greed g screening hedge g the fence ce and tans from sight. They have mowed the lawn and kept the area clean and neat at all times. I hope that the Water District will be allowed maximutt,` use of,their property. " Sincerel... , . James C. Ca on • r r I :,..wwww+rr...+..w...w•..•'..•.�....wr-..wur.•.rn.rrw+.w•y..ti r+.w....�..�.w�,,........w...v.....�w....,�r".'w.......ra.»+.w+.+.wr,..,M-►c+.ii..a,w...,wr..+a•a....r...ow-r...w..........,.,.� '.. • sic / ? ;�P,'S ^, TE 1R S S � SS s EJRFs~R BLVD P �i � i�d R' rQ� 97219 5O3-246.83, August 8. 1974 2 19/ . w CITY OF TIGARU City of Tigard .Building Depaitmen't 12420 S1 Main' M` Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen The residents of Cal � townhouse wa Hi 11 for the as well as our firm, have been disturb condominiums other residents in th immediate vicinity, ed fog some time by the expansion of the Tigard Water District's facility on Canterbury Lane t ' between SW 104th and 106th p i?p this what i s compatible with a residential al a expansion exceeds tea• It has become apparent to that this ex I and we are very disturbed that the City of Tigard has seen fit to grant a bui l ding permit for this addition. In further investigation it appears that this building permit has been granted in violation of the zoning ordinance for that and therefore i t i s our intention on to take all means ll. at area; an � . necessary to stop construction on the addition to the buildin , and to . g eliminate the traffic of heavy trucks and equipment in that area. • If this matter can be handled between the City of Tigard and, the Ti gat^d Water District, I would I' I out d prefer that. However, i f it cannot be handled in this way, intend residents i P officials,toad of whatever 'is necessary to bring this to the attent7 on of the city �y, thing be stopped. We feel estronithat if to the see �f this kind of the n can pp,' strongly zoning ordinances are good for the public, and are to be enforced upon builders in the area, they should also be enforced upon public agencies , to set the proper kind of example for growth in the area. I will await your findings in thi s V� truly`�r'ou•r ,,� I a±-l-• ", Arnett Vice President Anderson, City Attorneys' cc Anders() Dittman & Ande cc Bob Santee, Tigard Water District cc Dale Howe, Calway Homeowners Assoc. cc Glen Harding, Calway Homeowners Assoc . cc Residents of Calcaay . 9, I d tt el I I! • ii ,• ,t,p..^.^ -.YJM ..;.Ll.rn...i... .+«.a..,.,,*m,—x,+1ww: •; ,r/mw l.1!::kF.4U..y.#l.'R..--k...�w.x:..u4f...L–.3,JJ1'�d .1..w12,:. Y.... �.LJ..:xt< 1 .3...�FYn+ Y�.4.1.y1Ll.-..r.rk.WAWM...1.1iy:.1J(At11J..A.r..ita.....rw ., ...a..x .e� n�nA a,J. .t,• .i..rf...,... w,..- .;rw.a<u..e.._wwuan us-.. r .::.:✓1. .yin... tV;t'::: n:.i-,.r 1.V^ ' L C. Eldon Foster spoke as the representative for , Standard Oil Company. • , 0. Barkhurst moved t to m to approve the submitted site plan with staff recommendations., excluding those deleting the berms and artificial turf. (lickelson seconded . and the motion passed b y unanimous vote. it 8. 2 Tigard Water District A.Ae Staff recommended that the submitted site plan T': be disapproved in, that it does not adequately • - meet the 8ubmission requirements of the site �levelopm'er�: reivew ordinance, B. Bob Santee spoke as the representative of the • Tigard Water District. moved "O m ed -� approve C. Barkhurst la e th�e � , ubmLt ` ' Pp �� � �' d. site, `play to ' subject to staff' s final approval rov al o f t h e landscape _ plan. Lewis seconded and, the motion passed by 4* " unanimous vote of the Commission, present. x 5 9. A JOUF�NM ll ENT. . 4 Po1vla D r . r • • ' I I r • Pane 7 PC Minutes g Au us't 21, 197 , , r I ; » .....k..:a. .,....:1 . _..... ......,,. .wi..„wrx..-...rJu-.+, w..,,;.;•._,..„,,,,d..;,.«....r•.....::..,,.. :aan.w..s..2,...-.:s....-.._...::.»-,-.4 •10 The staff finds the landscape plan, submitted by the applicant ' to meet the standards set forth in Title 18 of the Tigard ' Municipal Code. • Staff Recommendation • The staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the site and landscaping plan as :submitted. with the followin g condition:,< • 1. That the applicant submit a revised site plan,P a 6 ' PP. the 20 foot sideyard setback requirement for M-2 zoned fl land, a,. stated in section 18.1+x•.040 of the 'Tigard Municipal Code. j _ ' 9.6 General Telephone Parking Lot Location: Directly behind existing City` Hall parking lot, ' , Street, 340 east of Main Street ....� access on Burnham eas Staff Findings pP parking plans Staff finds the applicant has submitted two alternate • for a parking lot to serve their new office facility located on S.W Main Street. • The staff finds the aPPlicant has not submitted a landscape plan necessary for planning commission action. ' The staff is concerned about safe pedestrian access from the proposed parking lot to the building served by such parking Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the, Planning Commission table this item until such time as a landscape plan is submitted for review and action. The staff sugg e sts the applicant, consider hot pedestrians a.re to safely travel from the parking lot to their office facility, ,id 9 7 Tigard water District Shop Addition Location: S.W.n.., o Canterbu ry Lane, adjacent reser voirs I ' ` on Little Bull Mountain Uet'We S.W. 106th and S.W. 103rd. • Staff finds the a. l .cant has not met the S submission requirements set forth in Section 18.58.030 of d . ,� i per. G�o'de. `��(.s .un�: the Tigard M includes the sub fission of an adequate landscaping plan, relating landscaping to adjacent Uses. • N I , - - ....a ,. ...:.,. _.. 1._::.,a.,•...-:_.. ,«.r.•,1„>; .•..r....................•.w1..1.a,...u:.ik-.i..1..qY,,,}.,iN.:ew...—.,.✓,rr..wsl,.,..•.•„..,.,,•,.4.,—axa.,,1.1„,r::...,r.,..+1'.1.Kxi»,'»ti..l.;+�k-:,.rLi:t'......:,,..,.,ww.u+7,p.+-',,:,as«:i»,...,oE.:.•.::.rF,-,b.A...:Soh#Mid„ss�w;rv.,'..rrrzKUal+l;«.'M+',r,1,.wnrFnuansM,a•.,,a.ixrrl,i,l,.+w<:,+n .,.nw•::.; ,..w.w +�Wxalb Staff finds the existing site has been recently annexed to the City' The site retains the Washington County zoning. R-7 Single Family Residential. The existing use was granted through a conditional use • approval granted by Washington County in 1969. The County's Policy I . permits expansion of conditional uses without reapplicationcfor.s:�°u:t.:. conditional use. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the applicants request for Site Development Plan Review approval and requests the applicant submit a detailed ' landscape plan sen'sitive'' to the surrounding residential use. • Staff �r I -.•�yY• • also request the applicant submit a letter to the Planning Commssio n • intended use of the shop addition. - r' int e detailing-the P d n 9.8 Lamb-Weston Office Addition li • Location: 6600 S.W. Hampton Street west of existing building Staff Findings 1 I L Staff' finds the applicant has. requested a revision in their n on 1 .\ r site and landscape plans by the -Planning G�mmi s s io o July 1►, 97� This revision is r due to a corporate•decision not to construct one ♦ module e of the proposed building addition. The I'he aria eliminated from f building coverage has been proposed for landscaping in:a manrlex° acceptable to the staff. S t a ff Recommendation I I I' I Staff recommends approval of the revised landscape plan as an amendment landscape plan approved b� the Planning Commission _I the �!' t to lams c on July 17, 1973. I I I I [ a a II , ,,lM I I lu 1 I :.: ...,.r ... li:: .. ... ,rr,'r .,. : • ,., ,, yr a:.i.r.n+,.wr.bN.. .«,„ , .., „.,,.,r.x, ,., .w.., r„v H n, e„,. , a, _ !" 1 � 1 • ......,11.-•..l..a.r.....:.. .wM.Gn...Lai,.i :.::I.,i.LL...%4«.iL.ELI. w.:Y.....,4.F„1.[.3.Y, .,.IJ.Ut'K-4 ..Tri..we...:,nF4U:.1xA.Yl;.lt..'C;k..:iA.w.ti.Yrs:suWMI 1 PP 1 . That the a iican;G .submit for staff approval a revised landscape plan to 'include the , . following iems : ( Elimipaton of prop o sed ea r th. m ounds and r "artificial turf". Areas covered by artificial turf • to be replaced by natural shrub materials • as on grape,., rhodod- P. as com act, orE�, •, such ds az �le � P g e s d ron � etc. n . Addition of a 1 GI foot by 20 foot planting area,• o Add Y , located a proximately 20 feet norch of the site' s PP existing structures. Thy"; plantir�lg area shall ■ include appropriate shrubs and g?,oundcover and t 2 medium size deciduous shade trees. This ent shall fulfill the raquire t men : requirement the described in finding three of this staff report. ,A fl '` 8. 4' Tigard Water District • Canterbury home, adjacent existing rl,�,tr c a t'i o n •S.W. reservoirs on Little Bull,, Mountain between S,W. 106th and S.W. 103td. Staff Findings, 1 . The applicant has submitted a perspective sketch of their proposed landscaping. The staff f finds P t ; t not meet the suh sl�e�,ch does n me the applicant ' s d'' 4 mission requirements set forth in Section 18. 5E1. 030 , of the Tigard Municipal Code. This includes the submission of an adequate landscaping plan, relating landscaping to adjacent uses. ' . Staff � ha3 been recently • 2 f finds the existing site annexed to the City. The site retains the Washington • an y Count y zoning, R-7 Single ramily Residential.dcn tial. The existing use was granted through a co nditional use e approval granted by g y Washin ton Count in 1969 The County ' s policy permits expansion of conditional pp uses without reapplication n for a conditional Use Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the applicants request for r Site Development Plan rieview approval and requests the applicant submit a detailed landscape plan sensitive to the surrounding residential use.1 Staff. also request the applicant submit ;a letter to the Plan nifl Commission, .g „ : � detailing the intended use of the shop addition. d t y IyY, •,J1 page 5' staff S •-af f Report . 4 , n 11. • (e”' I7 .,,,f . . . • 'i • ' .. .:N. ,. .,.• .w'6:... .....r _.-. ,.1. ..:.: ...4.w... .ti v4.1 h .� ,.Ii _ ., .w.:......x L. ,.,....i-,:w ..+.,.».».,rd...n.-..r,i•..<.,..,.+._,n..u,..,-r.wtY.ti....,As.::i51:1.u4.n.�'..-._.+,».kn4x^;W.rix-,_•vr+7,.:ew$L..»:.i«,i.i, ..tY..- , I' y, �,, ~ AS INGOT O d'TY +'' II COURTHOUSE—SECOND & MAIN STREETS �' ''' HILLSBORO,'OREGON 97123 • RCGo COMMISSIONERS F,D OF OOMM PLANNING EOA T OF DEPARTMENT I tSEPART N • ELDON ROUT, Chairman ' ,1 DALE C. JOHNSON, Director `' JOHN C. ANICKER Januar}f 1 7, 1 10 • �YEL L GARDNER (503) 646•1376 WILLIAM MASTERS , BURTON WILSON, Jr. I ; r r , a i P I • '' Tigard Water District 8841 SW Commercial Street . '' • Ti11E1rd, Oregon RE: Cu 4-69 c-. .'--k'' Gentlemen: tan County un r , , ifs meeting 'oh January 14, 1969, th© Washington Y At I Planning Commission approved your application requesting a ,• - conditional use permit to construct an additional water , described as tax lots reservoir at Reservoir Site NO. 1 x7600 and 2801 on tax map 2S 1 I I BO. a, , of the Planning Commission will be reviewed ' "the above action a g �a by the Board of County Commissioners at its 1 :30 p.m.' maeting , on Tuesday, February 4, 1969, DEPARTME:Nt OF PLANNING •X yy \ r. //, , ' , ,, DALE O. JOHNSON, D 1 RECTOR i. /a...J...1,, .•'• Rex McDaniel , Zon i ng Admi n i strator . \ y RM l p ,, �1 w r ,'('6.1'''-* .2 ‘' nc,i,i . /. i /' /. ,t, ...r''''``t irr ?.?'' P l?.11'1'1Y.E, -'6‘.e•'"'-''' !:r- ' i 6 - ,, 4,,,, . t....t , ,4 t,....1 -,:.,-'4.4r,„ ,,,,, ■ „.... i el t.--_, ,,,..4`'14.'" t.t.""" , z.,......... J/ r't 4. • ,l ' � ���C�� ts � � , C?�cC ��' �.� c.r .� , . , , � J 'y y� � r Gro /L� i, r • �f�., , ' e40.2,,,, . i;')7 ,.6.—,., i ✓ %"L ��G�' • ' ' ' ,,,,I a ) .,,e. ,i ,:?;--„e. 7,,,,-p,..., , /..(.(r , I � , , , . , _ � . N . M ■ • .. d �'d Y M L, {f' , 1. .• , lY January . 4, 1P59 TO: Planning Commission PROM: Director of Planning ' SUBJ: and 4-69 , UBJ CONDxTZ(�1AL USE 2-69, , The Tigard Water District, with offices at 0841 SW Commercial Street, Tigard, has requested that the County grant conditional use permits f , to allow development of reservoir facilities on three separate sites, Each of these sites currently support some reservoir facilities and the proposals are to, expand these as necessary b the rapid development p �, p ry to meet the de ` that have been placed on the serving district y p velopment in the area. It is the staff's opinion that the proposed expansions are appropriate and are compatible with the development that ;exists within each neighborhood, following discription and The i»ollowri. is a brief disc✓ definition of each proposal. o . .1 CU 2-69 r Baylor Street Reservoir Site '..r The subject site, zoned R-7 � , and located on the north side of y by Avenue and the r, SW Baylor Street is bounded on the east b 66th A Baldock Freeway. The near proximity to the south and west supports sparsely scattered residences, The OEA development is under con- struction to the north. The area to the east beyond the Freeway 1 lies within Multnomah County. There is an existing, above ground storage reservoir. 58-5 feet in diameter on the site approved under CU 26-62. The request proposes to add a second reservoir of similar dimensions to the l property. 2. CU 3-69 - Bull Ntounta n Reservoir Site The site in question, approved CU under 25 62 low profile � � fray the , ' reservoir that a tisty on it, i:s located on Bull Mountain on the north side of SW High Tor Drive, approximately 250 feet west of Std' 141st Avenue. The ec a. subject property is .lot within an approved ),,f residential subdivision which is approximately 25% developed to single family homes. North of the site is undeveloped. The q applicant proposes to add a second 50' dy ameter a low Profile reservoir to the north of the existing facility. 5: CU 4-69 Reservoir Site No 1 , located The Property erty a pp r a �matel 350� t est of SW' 103rd Av�!e`^n�ua e / and approximately 2td 1 no SW x�tr doc c Street is ZOLed , supports an existing 85 diameter reservoir, �t is proposed to , construct another tank og the same dimension The S ✓rounding C' Y north, south, and east. area is de elo ed �eSicleriti.al�. • the nC� cat d or. rv• ert: across �. v � �? An exception is t~h , Preshyt:er4, Phur�ch to e p p y the 20' access da i=ve.t:o t t'e do . The land to the west Y � � � is undeveloped.