Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR6-86
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. • • • `[f+ I CITY Of• TIGARD, OREGON ■ NOTICE OF FINAL ,DECISION - BY CITY COUNCIL (Sec. 18,32.380) •• I ,• 81)R 6. 8 6 and V 5�-8 5-86 .w.r�_ • Concerni:n t;aat� Number(s) .�...r �..r".__... • 2 Name of Owner: First Interstate; Trust 3 Name of Applicant: Gram.ore, Inc. Bary Bar Cain Address 10300 SW Greenbur Rd. 470 " �(r��1.ty�wP Portland, OR Zip 97223 : 4, Location of Property: Address Northwest corner of Pacific Ilighwan and Greenburg Road. j Legal Description 2S1 2AA lots 1000, 1001 , & 1100 . . • r• � : ��; � -, � � .�.,....�.....�.w. :..st��<y City ty C o un c a.1 to review e the Community' NaX't•Ur�! of A ,7.�c�taoti, P.e ue Cori to approve with conditions a request to develop ,. Development t.rretail.sauto�Se;. .� ..�..; „.�.,. p v__.. • . a 6800 sq. ft. retail/auto -virce building and an automotive car wash and a r r . Variance to delete a portion, of public, sa.ciewalk along Center St. ; & to allow a landscaped area of 13.5% where 15% is required. Property zoned Cf-G. 6. Ate rar7; The Tigard City Council opened the public hearing on April 14, 1986 and continued that hearing to April 28, 1986. Upon the conclusion of that hearing the Council approved striking the Planning Directors Condition 12 ~ , and allowing the ingress as shown on the.drawing and adding other conditions. • '' On May 12, 1986 the final order (Resolution Noel 86-59) was approved with s. •,, r conditions. r • q: Notice was Published iy the rew pad er) posted to City Hall and mailed to: .xX The sppiicant & owners I XX. Owners of record within hin the required distance nce I , • , XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental a ercies . ,. r ,I• Decision., I t THE DECISION WAS SIGNED) oN . 1 /86 y AND BECOMES EFEECTIV ' OIV2/86 5 of condition can be decision, and statement ,. The adr,�pted findings of fact, deco: , obtained from the Planning Department, iigard City Hall,, 12755 SW Ash, p.t o 23397 Tigard, Ore oti 97a23 . 8 , t . A review l of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) according to their r. ..s. procedures, ,I ,, 9. uastionsr If you have any questions, please call the Tigard City �;e,�rlyder at 6." 9_417 ., f ` I . . r = I ; • • . I : I ,Y •• Mm .,+ .wC..,....1., a 4...•...r ...,.-.r ..-r+.,. -,.w'nM..r a.W.,. .. `11•'.(' '.1 1 , CITY OF 'TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO 86-6 I II • N OF A FINAL ORDER UPON CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF A ° IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION PLANNING DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL OF A SITE DESIGN REVIEW REQUEST (SDR 6-86) AND A 5-86) FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. . r VARIANCE REQUEST (V a86) ADOPTING F April 28, ' n of r meeting P its• WHEREAS, this matter came :before the City Council at g �,. . 1986 upon the request of Council for review of the Planning Director's proVal of the application request; and a PP r v 1 and ' a oa pp WHEREAS, the City Council had before it the Director's lcation; 'and documentation provided by the applicant as part of the app WHEREAS, the applicable criteria in this decision are the following: • Chapter 18.108 of the Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.62 of the Tigard, Municipal Code Chapter 18.102 of the Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.100 of the Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.134 of the Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18,114 of the 'Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.164 of the Tigard Mu' icipal Code cil makes the following C Co un • the City cms t a WHEREAS based on the record in this rase y findings of fact , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: �- corner of Pacific •', • � site is located on the northwes., Section ly subject s The sub`e ,.r• Highway and Greenbur g Road (WCTM 251 2AA Lots 1000, 1001, and • � y 1100) within the Corporate limits of Tigard, Oregon, i ect rop ert consilsts o°f three tax lots which contain a' • Section 2, The subject p p y g single family residence, •° commercial building and a s�,rigle fama.l rest . , Section 3: The property is zoned C-G (Commercial General) . w y revieW approval to develop a _ 6,800 applicant requested design pp Section 4: T 4 retail/auto service building and an automatic car nested sate es �,'800 sq� ft. 1 wash. In addition, the applicant requested a variance for deletion of a portion of public sidewalk along SW Center Street delet , allow a landscape area of 13.5%' where 15% is required.and to ' u ' Section 5: Section 16.120.020 requires Site Development Review approval for all new developments, � � y 15% landscaping in the . . Section 18.62,050 (6) requires a minimum of Bettie, 6i General Commercial (C-C) zones • • r _ II I , RESOLUTION NO 86- • Paae • ' _ -/ _ `. .. _ b .Ids •. I/ 4�. , Section 7: Section 18.164.0I0 requires • sidewalks on both sides of arterial and collector streets to be built at the time of construction. ' The City Council also makes the following conclusions of law: (1) The City Council concludes that the applicants proposal conforms to the applicable criteria contained in the Tigard :P . Municipal Code. I (2) The City Council concludes that direct vehicular ingress as Road shall be permitted the plan submitted at Greenburg aoa p , shown on and that Condition #12 contained in the Planning Director's r. approval shall be removed. The language to be deleted it as follows: (Direct vehicular ingress-egress at Greenburg Road shall not be permitted.) (3) The City Council concludes that a non-remonstrance agreement ''; - for the sidewalk on center Street shall be required. The language - to be added as a condition is underlined as follows: A non-remonstrance ag eement for the sidewalk on SW Center Street in front of t 'e sub,jecfsite shall be s find, nota ized and riled ,II with the City Recorder for ap'provsl b,y the City Attorney. The City Council therefore orders that the above referenced determination 6,e, y be, and same hereby is, approved. done Council further orders ;that the City Pe corder send a copy of the final. t order as a ,notice of final decision in this matter. I PASSED: This ...,,,12.1_1"\ ... 1", day of "Y1 k .. 1986, . r q. . ohrt E. Cook, Mayor City of Tigard AIMS a , Loreen R. V� lson, City Recorder City of Tigard I�, fi ,," (br(4) )7 J �1 • R 1, J - • • gi STATES O F OREGON INTER FFICE MEMO TO: NElvIO TQ THE F TF; DATE: April 24, 1986 ' • FROM: Leon al H. Gunderson Asst. District Maintenance Supervisor eu s,i scT: Gramore, Inc. Development 99W (Pacific Hwy. ) at SW Greenburg Road City of Tigard . This memorandum summarizes `� the series of events which led to the issuance • access permit for the subject development. The civil engineer, Tom t. of the ac.cc. . g• the site related to traffic Ba.r hausen, met with me to discuss concerns of circulation and operations of Highway 99W/Greenburg Rd. intersection. The ' major issues were the allowances of left turns from Pacific Hwy. onto the site, provision of a channel i zation island to protect the traffic signal span pole at the northwest corner of the Greenburg intersection and capacity analysis of the intersection. As requested, the developer submitted a Traffic Impact Report which met the requirements for proposed developments along state highway facilities. The • report etas review al by our Traffic Engineer and. bad the followi,ngg concerns • revs ,r with the submitted site plan designs • 1. Ability to make left turns from the site onto Pacific Hwy. 2. g car wash to the Center St. exit clear sight line from the Lar was • 3.. Des.igof the right turn in only drivewa• on Greenburg Rd Design g Y y A meeting was held on March 28, 1986 to discuss site plan modifications to The developer, operators, traffic � ; •.r .• solve our concerns. per, the car wash rators© , civil and engineering consultants, City of Tigard staff and our staff were in attendance. Through discussion and concensuus of the participants, the Pacific Hwy. driveway waS modified to restrict left turns from the site onto Pacific Highway by the s r adding of a raised concrete channelization island. The design of the island does allow left turn movements form Pacific Highway into the site. The allow- ance for these left turn movements at the driveway eliminates left turn move rrenst at both the Hwy. 99W/Greenburg and the Greeriburg/Center intersections. The existing left turn storage bay and taper area is large enough to provide refuge for movements into the site With the elimination of the left turn movement out of the site at the Pacific Highway driveway it becomes essential that motorists wanting to go eastbound on Pacific Highway are l aware of the Center Street exit. The developer agreed to place, install and maintain signs at the exit of the car wash to direct • traffic to the Center Street exits Maintenance of the;directional signs is critical is 1 to the safe operations.' driveways. I � t-n.Ons at thy, site c.�:�ive a. �e o �.,a he Greenburg Road right turn in only driveway is desired. It would relieve the Pacific Highway intersection of some vehicles. However, it must be designed to discourage illegal left turns from Greenberg Road into the site. The drive way design was modified by increasing the skew angle and radius of the approach • r L..,.:.:•....:._.,J«_,.... .......,„-cl...._.,Y muu.w -,.. ..i.M....-....,,.•,...,h...«....-. c._....0 ,..,_.-._.a............... ..»....N .,.' ....i- «..M.n..m _.-- ... ( r 1 Page Two I..% TO THE FILE 1 i dewalk back from the curb to allow for low landscaping to :�r '� curb, moving the s • block the opening from sight of the northbound Greensburg motorists. The site plans were modified according to the concensus of the meeting and submitted for review to nor office. The revised site plans met with our c approval and the Pacific Highway access permit for the developaent was isw'.zed on April 14 I I , LIG �s • Tiaard cc. City of Council to the record for Public Hearing for. Gramore Uev. ' ' �,, �,,.C�-1�y of Tigard City • Wilsey and Ham , . r, I I d • I • G' n L, I • ii I I • 1 r I I • y . r 1' • " , 1 A I • -..:-'.1..,!.......:,.F..« «.L..ti:.:....t.a✓..u..ry h..w..A�....n•..,...4 ..+...� ...Nk., .i:.+ ...,.L4.L.., :a ......N.V..'.. I .....:-.0 � 1�L , • v BARRY A CAIN I N ,, GRASORE INC. � ' LINCOLN 470 10300 SW Greenberg Rd. •d ,1 .. . zr7,a1.a s, 01 .7fi223 First Interstate Trust F . • r pp Box 2971 T-11 Portland, ■ R 97208 'I Sul a.var� 'sbmn Bdr hau .Y •� g ser>< �` 6625 S. 190th Street 53 SW Yamhill Kent, WA 98132 Portalnd, OR c . P �' ✓ I // .._I , lv w�N,.r• Fes, • , Gary \at s iori '1,;,'''''''''' ,om 1.11, I I Wilsey & Ham ,;m 2 5 1 SW 11th Portland, OR I 1 h Thomas Seel, y 1 1 an sr. I� • 12105 SW 72 zd '• ' OR 97223 • Tigard, I , g r . }••+°..^iyfat ;'y".t', ',i'6Y `!•i•`.•t,?nr;,t.''YNpT :�, u ,..N r'rr 4"a. „pf»F.: N , X„ } v7 I i I , Toms i;gh s o Wrightson Properties , I 520 Sine Yamhi1,l ' ' I . ' �,, Por t].a, d, O R 4 c . • Lf. I •, •" , 4' 1 } ; d V • r j, M1 ,'b • f ....du«-_-_,...u. ...«A::..,1 ..A4_.......;;:: •.w.« .:.rll,.. .. ....................:...—...+A.,,h,.. r u ry ....,.. ..i....l tr Y., '1 444„f •,H. (.0), I AFFIDAVIT 0 M„ALLING 1; .•. • 'STATE OF OREGON s s ) County of Washington City of Tigard ) ` h de ose I, ,� Loreen R. 'Wilson . , being first dul y sworn, on oat P 2 ' and say: (Please Print) ,: That 1 am)At th e Iteco'rdex for . The City of Tigard, Oregon.. • . . Th at I served ve d notice of Fit1a1 Decision for the Tigard City Council L copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following of which the attached pis `a py 1. ' day o • L $ b � mailing to named persons on kite y f . _._.' Exhibit $} e each of thew at 'the address shown on JIched fist on (Marked ,. -t. s7• said notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United. States Mail the y` ..:'7'T 1 day of e> c 1984' • postage prepaid. . Signature ,AA v.,L , . w A 4„.., -, Fc:rson whn del deli to P OFFICE • • me on the ',,�� '"� day o f G�, .� 19 . • sworn to before . Subscribed and sw . t NOTARY PUBLIC OF o$E(:J• ' My Commission Expires ; 1 ' - , • 4 Z 7L') • b � •! I' GvJt«' 1~ °' n.11 •� ' n . U .I n �I r i S • 1.. I CITY OF TIGARD DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SD 6-86 . vARIANcE V 5_06 . A_PlC ' hl Request by First " rt Trust develop 2 a 6800 s / ft, ' _ - retail/auto service building and an automatic car wash. A Variance • is also , ` sidewalk along Center Street and 'requested for deletion of a portion of public 1,�.�•: ; ° to ''t1.l.a1/4 a i uidscai d area of 13.5% where 15% is required The p roPer'ty is zoned C—G (Commercial General) and is located at the Northwest corner of f Pacific Highway and oreenburg Road (WCTM 281 :aAA lots 11700, 1001, and 1.1.00), •., r••' i s E"telnela c i.uen that ti„1e 'Pl.artr1i.rrg Director for the Ci,•t,t of MM.t t:7( E11 s t,a c e . . C7gar d has APPROVED the above described applications subject to cer Lain i cont 1.t,t si,ons on �+;I»ti.cl�t Llit€t Director 1aa,s±d Irri.s crarrcli.ti•��rts, "I"Ite f i,rtd�.rRgs attd • (iec l s loti are as no•t:ed bel,c)w A, FINDING t. OF .a 1. Sackgro tt "h;t City has reviewed several land t.ts t appl;i,ca• i,r•,rts for tllr proper• Y, the most recent being a Conditional Use (CU 4»-82) to approve a flower shop, 2. Vicinity ity inifr:,rrn••tt,i,or► . The property is surrounded by Pacific Highway, CreefbUrg Road, and . Center street, The zoning of th south side of Pacific Hi,g,hwaty is w;. ` The aria t7erti•es east of c�3reenburg r, C�31;)� (Central P:�Gt"a 7.i��s s L��•s iY`�`�,c ) ' 1' b � `^ -" , ”"° General) and thw parcels north ra'P :�. l��a�d are zoned C �� (Commercial a.�a�, �) 1 • , Center Street are zoned C—P (Commercial Professional) . Site Information and Proposal Description consists of three tax lots which contain a . � The s�tl;�;j�±c,`t: lar"rapt~tr°•t:� cw �trs�,s•��" • •, commercial building a single family residence, Driveway veway, access is ' d pr t;entl.y available from Pacific Hi.glhway, Creenbur i Road and center b Ti The alS1,`)l.icant proposes to re±rn0■le thhet exi,sti.tig 1bui.1.di.r1g and construct a car wash In the wustern portion of tt'le prolaerrr':y and a . retail/automotive service building near Greenhur l Road Ones driveway entrancq Is intended for each of the three streets abutting the j property. the property will be filled to more closely resemble tho grade of Pacific Highway. This will 'require a retaining wale, which is as high as 10 feet near tho western end of the parcel., A 20 foot high 100 square foot s(gn has also boon presented for approval, Variances aro also r trluested to roduce the required amount of landscaped area from 1!3% to appr oxi.ma• e y 18.5%. and to allow the deletion of sidewalk along most of the t frontage. , D1RI~.C'T0R Dl CTSXON Sbl 6-86 "/ V 5-86 Page 1 _ a'r , ,. n• _.:, ., ...i .,,. �, X54 r K ♦. ._ JGti , ...,.. .. -- - _ J..._J,1....w..,........- I,n, .. ......,rl.l-...✓ Il::._ A_,F.... . -..J:n .M.. _ 1 ..,.. . • 4. ng( 17cy ar1d l\IPPO l rar►trnerrk The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. A sanitary sewer connection permit for arty new additions. ' ha, All work performed within the •Pacific Highway right—of-.-,Jay will require a: permit from the State Highway Division, , C. Vist»tal clearance mast be r►7ai,ntatined at intersections and driveways, 4 e �. , ,I� must �I installed i• d a : all corners and on the d, Wheelchair ramps must: a4 n , ' island. proposed traffic signal i,s , e. A traffic control' pavement marking plain must be submitted for city and State approval, prior to ,installation. by the applicant. , f. The Proposed driveway on Greenbt,trg' Toad should not be installed because of the existing congestion at the Pacific Highway intersection, the difficulty in prohibiting left turn attempts . onto the property, and the City policy which calls for mi,riinti ill`7r� the number of access points, on arterial; and collector • st •eets, g. The storm drain catch basin and line proposed to be installed at the intersection of Crtenburg Road and center street needs to be • rerouted to avoid crossing private Property. It is suggested • connected t z �tl'1at't; the r,,a'l.cl�i��zsa.t�t be directly ,t�� t.lyc.. manhole at the intersection The guardrail shall relocated �� aer _ I Pacific Highway se not • removed is, The proposed retaining wail near Center Street is a potential eyesore, particularly if it becomes a target for graffiti. Care { should be taken to provide landscaping which will act to minimize the •r"obii. rn, 1 j No objection to the variance requests. The Building Inspection r) vision and Tigard Water District have no y, objection to the request. 1 l he State Highway Division states that a traffic impact report is necessary to evaluate the impact of access alternatives, A Road Approach Permit is required and the necessary street improvements shall, Abe determined after the report is completed POE notes that: several utility poles will need to be moved 1 . I No other comments have been er oiv a i I DIRECTOR !t:)LCISIOIti 8OR 6-86 V 5-06 ' Page e 2 , .M . 4. .....•.. ..,.ate.. — .w . Y 5 t 't1, • y B. Al\I L.YSI$ AND r,.,OttCLLIS I.t t'tl The proposed commercial development is b sically consistent with the t ' . , relevant standards and criteria contained in the Community Developme nt ¢¢ 1 Code. However, several aspects of the proposal including the variance 1 request warrant further discussion, i . 1, Access + The Orenburg Road driveway is not appropriate for the reasons notecl lay 1 "1• Division, This driveway should be removed and it is the Engineering , recommended that a pedestrian link between the public sidewalk and the 1 r project be provided it'd its p ,arr e 2, Visual Clearance required that objects taller than three i=eet -i.ti Chapter 1.8„1,c�2 of the Code This � • height cannot be within 30 feet of intersections and driveways , particularly important near busy intersections. )~t • portion of the Code is par ' ' ,... is recommended tla't the two R maples 1 at are shown � ' t aci arHighway atd Center Street driveways be eliminated. Also, the 1 mature height of ail other landscaping material should not exceed three , feet, i , 8 , Landscaping 1••h e :proposed landscaping plan generally y cc'of orms with Code r oqu .rements '✓ with the exception of visual, clearance (discussed above) lot coverage tge (noted below r4n ler the variance review) , street trees, and the"r treatment of the proposed retaining ,4a11, ; The Center Street frontage does not include street trec ; �> N� rtaN�d ey . the Cod( presumably because of r► proposed retaining wa]: . The deletion . r of street trees appears to be justified, however, the , majority landscaping • treatment in this area needs rev ision. The of the 255 foot long iretaining wall will be over six feet in height and potentially co u ld have , a d et i ia 7I aj visual :mp act No vegetation is proposed to soften or ' I' ', screen the wall,1l. . A revised landscaping plan should be prepared lay a landscape architect for the retaining wail area The plain, should contain a justification for the , ` proposed height of the wal.;ly plant materials that will screen all or most 1. of the retaining wall, an elevation drawing illustrating the wall and g landscaping t the right-of-way area � proposed landscaping, and 1,atycl.rc�:ta�ItiG treatment of t,f�� ' ,, between the retaining wall and the curb. 4, Variances As mentioned earlier, two variance requests have been made to reduce the landscaping coverage to 1.3,5% and to eliminate urinate at sidewalk from the Center Street ' to the corner t"ie �rro:pert Section 10 4184,050 ' ,, „ .. �tre�,t dra.vs~�way western ' of f 6 I �1� �, % I a criteria for gN ant. ' of the t;;r;��dt. contains the following�r,�wi►'�g rycpprrr.�ua1,� for granting a , varrianc , . I • . OXI t CTOt b C:tSION St)F`t 6-86 / V 5.,86 Page 8 • • iS I I ., re t r ' q q fin• a. The proposed variance will not � materially! z detrimental mental to the purposes` of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the t:rr any other applicable policies and standards; t�rarnpr�l't�.nsilr�� Plan, ' .t^ �t�(a�,�,r: � a in the same ty, • I and to other properties�Jert�.es � zoning district.� rat^ ua.cxt7a• ,,�•� I that exist which �tre peculiar to the � .•° 1•� special�l•CRN ii circumstances }}. '� There ' lot size or shape, topography, or o'u'ter circumstances over which the applicant has no control., and which are not applicable to other , properties in the Isame zoning district; this brad e and ted der this + t will r rnc� sts 'et^rna.'l: ttt"t s » a .d �,l 1. I� » � )ase Lt se. rr� . A City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is ,,f• • reasonable possible, while permitting some economic use of the land; 1 : i f . d Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to , traffic, drna;r.rtage, dramatic hand forms or parks will not be adversk•ly ' . , affected'' lny more than would occur if the development were located as ..,r�rr,;i'fied in the code; and i ' • e The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance roquested is the ; •r minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship, ,, ' The proposed variance to the larc sca:irq coverage requirement is minor a d ' C '. it will be difficult to notice a difference between the required minimum , • (6,317 square feet) au td what is proposed ("a,680 square feet) , `rt'u I J pc'operty is long and irregular in shatpe with street frontage on virtually the entire perimeter which has Presented unique Problems related lye ,' right"-fuf'•way dedication, street improvements,s, atnd internal circulation.,, Y� C-G zortez a1r"tc) the request will not j ,' "�"hte! proposed uses a,t�e permitted in the ", adversely affect. Physical or natural systems { Finally, the hardship is not self--impos ed because the primary reason for M "" � •. "� The request » 1 hardship♦ N a variance 's duo to the irregular Parcel con'f`ir..tr ation, the titer: .»" appears to be the minimums necessar` and also, the regquired modifications to the site lend landscaping plans will cause slight increase in the amount of landscaped area, . 1 5 to justified for,. ; � ' The proposed sidewalk variance - - be � . � �'ttl�e! In��,�r:'J a�.plae�.rs to fallowing reasons 11 ,".. slate Highway right-of-way and the embankment for Pacific is Highway 1, r nll tt"t hero, it.r`eet lot •• t 1 w t~ g ." r't(. he lies to the west t; r�f L{7 r JI,►ery • i 1 Potential for arty extension of the s�,dew .lk is minimal., I ecause of the large amount of 'frontage,# the at p1.1ca st is respons .l;le , �- substantial quantity r,ty o'f street improvements itrsd this portion of : • f,f" • for a 1, sidewalk would be of mein value and it could actually cause �'1.ta >A1a i I• �c� problems ay encouraging Pedestrians cross t he street in the o l he block I ! , a • DIRECTOR OECI xt`�(t,{ OOR 6-86 / V ,ref""g; Page k.,, • • y _ • • O ' " r 1• The applicant is providing all other half s tye n err v� M 1t 1 � � required aired ` by City Code and that devel,riprnent will, be able to aderlt.rat:el,y c t d traffic i s ra the Perimeter r^ f •l l 1 vehicular 'f on er••:i,m � an h ;r�. clr"t accommodate !� pedestrian,3't 1 : site 3 3 i.griag ' . . : "" Pe ap pl�can� as proposing to install am foot tall,l 1O� square foot s ign and the standard tree requirement' s allow for signs �� feet i ; in height and 70 square feet in area, However, during the Site 1 vlraprtterrt, Review process Section 18,114,130 (g) (3) allows Up to an °� I't _ r cl ., . +,' 's 1JI1�, developments additional, dev .l.a met �' 50% increase in sign copy area }r multiple tenants The project will have four businesses and the ' >� appropriate� � ,s consistent with 1 •i. ', proposed sign appears to be ppropriate arnd it L standards ,, Pacific t a ~wGy • , a p to Commercial Street r AS part of a long range plan to lnf in 1 , ' M problems in the downtown are and on Pacific Highway, an exit ramp anr Has boon proposed from Pacific Highway adjacent to the subject property to Center Street and then on to Commercial Street. The 1 ... Engineering , Division recommends that the development of this site does not preclude the eventual construction of this exit, C. t)ECI IOltl , The P ,a�.ritning Director approves t=�t)R 6-86/V 5-86 subject to the following conditions: • 1 , UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,t), A1.L CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR 'i•0 ISSUANCE 0t= BUI1.D;t:illt PERMITS, Standard half—street improvements, incua7g i c a " wheelchair ramps, driveway apron, :r dra: "ag� Ia �a1 a `t1 , frontage) and utility sargnaiization relocation shall be installed , i along the $W Pacific Hwy, frontage, Said improvements along SW [ ' • Pacific Highway shall be built to Major Arterial standards prd .f. ' I conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements and conditions of the State Highway Division pc milt, • 8 , Standard i ra1f sLr�ct improvements s an • ding sidewalk, curb, Pavement r markings, wheelchair ramps, storm c;r ainJe and r t i l aty relocation shall be installed along the SW ;reenhurg Roan frontage, Said improvements along gW Cre e nbtr; Road shall be built to Ma j or ' Collector standards and conform to the alignment of existing adjacent •. , improvements and conditions of the City' s Street Operxng Cewml :, , i a«yµ ,tW d t1 6.'1 -st.ro e.t Irtr rrav +rnterr•t�$ i,11r;l 4„lei itlg (pars`1,i,t1 few rr'tage) ��, 1 • �a�_� iy�•t.574t(�,�4J,r4,1 i rt 0�A1•f J t✓r l #.. � /h K.,• n rti I � ! . s:I I curb retaa,rwi.rrtg wt'1,1. c,rtwx,vewatr� al r a n, .�t,or rn dt ai,naga and a i dewal;t, the ��!I Center Street be installed e 1 along . u�t•t;i.l•it9 rr,�l,�.)catx,c:�t�t shall 4 � built to Local . �' SW Center Street: shall be buil . Local frontage, Said improvements tnl • ,; Street standards and conform to the a Lil g nmeit of existing adjacent t improvements and conditions of the City,s Street Opening Permit. ' ; Y. • ” t)l 646 I V 5-56 Page I ; n II . I 444 i i 1 k sets of 1.a1~t� t c)•fi.l,c� yulal♦i,r, i,rll7rr.,r�erlrel�t: c(.)1"1�,;'tr4uc'ti.ral'1 pl.al�ls •;> stlnd (1) l.•teriii,z+:d construction cost 'es•ti.ltrate, s•t .t(tpe.d by a Reg i.s't:ered p^Ctfess:l;r.)l'ral. Civil Engineer, d�.L�.a♦la.11 c,.� �t 1,l♦ proposed c sed p ubla a:rlrprrovertler"rts slia.l,l, be submitted ♦trh t1"1e El"Ig:i nf.?.eri.1"tg Sect i.ora for ,pprrrtaal p, bani.tzary sew et'.. ccal"lriec•ti.r.l'.1 details shall♦ be pr�•rarri.ded as part of t:he publ♦Ic i.rnpr (,,»ernerr•t plans r 17. Construction of proposedl publ♦i.rimprovements ,,),;' 11 ocm l , after the Engineering Section has issued a aa w,u d public improvements ' pl.ars, 11•te Sc.c Ga r will l r g -. 1 s of 100% NPer••Eorl,rafce Bond • r x' t a1,1a.ttOrr tee. A:l.sca, the the payrnerrt of ��, p�t�•mi••t= ficc� anti a sign a.1"ts' executi.0r1 of a, s trt`et • r operii♦1"q perrni.t ,shiall, occur prior to, or �rrrcul rer'tly with the a.M>ss�la!tre r•f :�D aprr,ued public irn rovemen.t pl.arns, ' SEE 1"1-1E: EliIC1 OSEl) MA1\11)4U1 C ;VIItIC MORE b P1-''CI "I('` II' ORMtI EG(ROING 1" SCI11DU1 1: It111U)"ti.i..: tllstlfalt l°'lltl"l r,_ I t • ' 1 al♦ t^i 1r t<-ra f u4a i sl"1 l,a. be 1 ► 1 a,��:�t:e l try l;l're Public at i.l ,'� . Addi.t,io~t , i 8 r g r . wc.. rserta♦ort •tr, .�rrsv'ide °fror a ♦tt.trrti'a.tig • �� I 1 � t �"tea ! C�ntrN:l.r:i.c hl:l.g�l yl g. l.tztl"ie r)ritra I:)ptci♦fa,c E•li,gh"ti ay fr�'hr1 .ertbuhg Road, 1Ito descra.ptirarl for c to •tl••t etcd.$ta.f r''a♦c h•tw».r;�,�f,..,stay cetrt•t:ar1irtc ' . said ciedi♦1:a•tti.c:�rl sh�x:1. be •t:l,�.I g ` as �stal:)l.i,sl"ted br J n�,,i"l .tlgtr!"t County. ►�i� t�l c:rl i.c;za1i.ot.1 dcocLtrtr rntt shal,i♦ W. . • be on t i,•ty •1r�rnrs arrd apptrr♦�vred by tthre Et'tg x.t•lEacl''a,rlg 9ec::•t a,rat r 1)�Qj C A C�p 1 1.• . ., FORMS i111) 1:1tISrRUc1"XO11Is ARE r111CI.OSI D • I 9, A pc:i!^rni.t s1"t.t I be c.+1'tai l'.ted by •the tpapi.i♦rNart•t, .for work prr,prosed to be 1 • dciiir wi,thri,r t W hyaci.fi.c 1'•1i.g1•71),)ay from 't he S.ta'te 1..1i,ghttlay C)1rti,si,rati. f) •• crop o'f said permit :8ha11. be provided to the C:i.'t r t' • r' . 11 1,0, Visual, clearance at dra.rreways and at intersections shall be provided ' for in ste: ;r.,rri.atr1ce with I Irana.ctpal. Code Chapter 18,1 control pavement markincxy, sa,gt'ro,l. and sx♦grna.11g . pedestrian r1 �ra�`' 1• 1,. � � r .. " proposed plan prepared by a. rec 'i•s•t:e1 ed civil, engineer, detailing a p `` , • . marl<i,r•1c), si.G, t'r-1.1 and sa.gtiir"tg a,tltl')retremettts shall be submitted to the I' w�" Errga.neer a.ng urF„!s'ti♦ort for approval and to the State IAti♦gh1waty 0i.vi.s:irrsn n' . for approrra`i.rI ' 12, Direct tQriCula" i n i^e s sw..,e tre s s at Creer burg R(,)ad shall not be 1 t . �NrN per•rimi tI t,ed, • •• 13, Concrete sidewalk s atll be installed Fr om the proposed driveway apron I � Cre .ri1 ►�i Road, ,,, •• oft Pa(:;"i.i'ic tia.c h`lt),tay, along 'Pacific h♦I ghw .y, along w r"J • along Center Street, to the proposed t:dra:■eway apron oh Center Street:, 1 ' ,' r pipes wires, si nal.s, i ng Utilities,s, per,,les, ' 14. Rel.cac��.•ta.r.�r'•t of any c�v�:1,s•i;' r 1, at the , � g signal. 1 1, tc s, or any such equipment shall. •�e a• tt`'te e ;pense of the • . I .• i i t I I h tIRkw OR DECISION SOR 6 � V 5'86' r e r ♦.r I I L v . •r { to • • 15, (' revised site Plan shall be submitted for Community Development Director approval which deletes the proposed driveway on Creenburc Road and illustrates the location of the proposed free standing sign 16. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted for Community Development Director approval which is consistent with Chapter 18.112 I' Spec if icall` the two Red maple' trees adjacent to . . Vi• n+ sual clearance. wl, the Center Street and Pacific Highway driveways shall be deleted and verification shall be provided that tne mature height of other y . landscaping materials will be less than three feet, Also, the landscaped area shall not be reduced to less than 13.5% of the total lot area. 17. A landsoapi ng plan, Prepared b��� a la'lrYdscape architect, shall be f r submitted for Community Deveio�ament•, Director approval which deals with the retaining wall including the fol.l ow i.ng r a. Landscaping materials to screen ail or most of the wall. I I b. F•t, ,;nation drawing of the proposed retaining wall, and plant. .I materi=als: c. and scapir material between the re tai ni n wal l and the curb : Reduction of wall height as much as practical, di � 1.8, Maintenance of the landscaping within the Center Street right'-of-way _; .. shall be the r espons i.h l i.'tY of the app'1.:i arn•t;/pr+oper'L;y owner 19. The one fr ee standing sign shall not exceed 100 r ai feet nor side or a total of ZOO square feet. I lots 1000 1001 and 1100 shall ,,., combined into nt e C re- parcel u I f This approval is valid if exerr*ised within one year (ar the final. decision date noted below w • U. "i.)Rt.)t�t�Dlllsw 1t the newspaper, 4 at City Hall �;, was published l in `�:IY�. ry�.t� 1" p r , p a.,tec,l ,� 1,i Notice: Illt./G a.�,�:. �nia and mailed tot i 1 ; .r i I XX •/ I i I r� � The applicant owe owners i XX Owners of record within the required l distance w...l::a,.l.•wIW.••,w•.••e,l•1•u XX The ,affected Neighborhood Planning Organization ....:Iw•.w,wwww•AUw••WUW XX Affected governmental agencies I I � . ww M•:Aww1•w •wlwwwwl«wwww W"w . C1F,'111,ST,O111 SHALL Ww1%I11t1.LW 01111 WLaw••rMwwcr•1h w ?,I3, •WrWwINMI•w+.rNWMWW 11111LN1:°S4 At:li' Ail:M,' TS 1"wallNl"WD I ;I. DIkE.',CTO F4C ,ION S I 6. 84 / V 5-46 Page 7 } •ll �, , ) n 1 O • • ..,..-a-��,•..:..r,:w,,.l..m,i. .Sw.. _r wu..... �..r,,.. .! L. »a..� . . al:«...J..+-.r .,"•. r++1x. t , . ( 'a z ;; 3, Ajapealt L. . Any party to the decision may appeal this decision i,n accordance with Section 18,32.290(A) and Section 18.32,370 of the Community , 0e\,el.opmen•t: 'Code which provides that a written appeal. must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 2 t 30 PM, Marc1.1.r„2 /1;286. 1:� t°al Gi��e City'ty s�f , . 4. ��aaes•t .r,�ns; If you have any questions, pl ase N N,r r r-rrrrr rr� Tigard City Hall, 12755 W Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97'223, 639.4 a•71, , ,,,,,/) / /2 /12i, , rr ,/ ,.r �rr rrr r r r rr r ..�....rr�r )�rr,r.r , DA f 1aREPA E FAY ith Liden, Senior Planner •4 r•wWwl•m+• Development � + 4 . ,. I� _ e .: rrr 1 William A. Monahan, Director of Community . r ^ ` f�APPROVED X i J (KSLI2418P/dmj) i - 1 . r.. '4,11 ,!..k 0 . .). x.....b , - . .. .., to), lo..-AL # di, , 0 ® •� V �i•• a ®♦�� yu• • ...._ .4....•••,..,..,..,„,..t, . , J 1 • } y , I}} I ; I 4 I ss I 1 ., Page 0 I, • • fir,: r , I R • ,».:4Ltil....«"... • l ..iS14d..iM-.i..•,.rw_:.:`..:.�,.M�.`.la.»..w:....v�,»«I�.,.,�.;�XH,_ab�.ew,�;.......4.....t_..+.HN,-..r..,..,.�..uu�wtw.e�.�.i.-w...,a..r....i.�th,.�x.�.«.•.a., �.:. ......,. ��. .,_...+v..:'. .,;,. Gramore, Inc. SUSSETT/MASTERS/BTSSETT • One Lincoln Center 1 470 14680 SW 141st " 10300 SW Greenberg Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97223 • EARGHIAUSEN CONSULTING ENG. INC BUSSETT I { 6625 South 190th Suite 102 US NATIONAL BANK as TRUSTEES , Washington 98032 2004 NW IRVING ST, fCex�t Wash�.n tan 980 • PORTLAND OR 97209 •• First I n tees a Trust I I PO 'ax 2971 T-1 t • Portland„ OR 97208 • • • AITKE> 15705 SW ALDERBROOK DR. TIGARD OR 97223 • HEIlir.t1Z 8925 SW Center St. TIGARD OR 97223 I , FINLEY NLEY I , 8945 SW Center i OR 97223 • g 9 %PRICKETT 10 0 � SW 119th 1 I I �� 7223. Tigard 0�' � ar I g I L SSE L 8985 SW Center St. 1' Tigard, OR 97223 I; I . I I I a.° DAVIS • 1 1470 SW CreenibUrg` Er1 Tigard, OR. 972231 • 1. ;} , w • ' � C. • . Fa . • [\,, ....I I)..;-r.,..,.m-_ I.,.,,.u..:....« ..eiMxJ-i.,»-;P,a...L:..f�..:i.«..H,. w.«....., .—...+•..,.... a......t,...w ... r-..» .r...i...r -»+`-.% R ' 6, ° 1, r r „, •., . " ,y.. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING • STATE OF OREGON ) . �r , Washington County of Wa ton � ss 9 City of Tigard _ -� 1, .,((,„J,\,- <'5 being first duly sw am, on oath depose se and say (Please Print) • 4 ..c .� ., f o r That I am a \,/ r • The City of lliga Oregon. That I served notice of Final Decision for City and Plan y of Tigard Planning Director of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following e y ___�_ aura l i. to h ' � day of '198 by ng persons onl .t -- named erso the attached list (Marked 'EExhibit 8), each of them at the address shown on a said notice as hereto attached, by "posting on an appropriate bulletin board on the day of i ....- , 19,.x.; and deposited in the United___,_....,,,Z;?2,d_c__,,� the 108 f� postage Mail on a day of `� �� � Mates Mai prepaid. , • n r- Sign •ure o , ( i i 1 i / # ' .a Person who posted o; ulletin Board Person ihto de ivered to P0 T OFFXCC „ before me on the da of _ !..X tIx , 19�� ” (:?,Subs.rr Toed and sworn to befo ,,... r, + NOTARY PUBLIC WF OREGON I �sr My ;Cormass ;orr Ettppires; I (02.57P) A Y^P ( ')t i il tl _ 4i. .n:L. w..L.w - r ......411...l-H.-w..-nr ,u.lA n ..hhiNrN.• .1-nw._.r . II • �,. 1898 w 'Y 'r `'_''. r' OTIAR . art OF �, *d-4---.7-,i'' - /?.-.-4...-- ti' . r . WASHIlk,(",041:.)N C.OUNTY,OfEG, (ii:_;IL.,_,.',j"..,...l' s._ COMPANIES 7..x.,5` .,. BARRY A,CAIN GFIAMORE, INC. One Lincoln Center,#470 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 10300 S.W,Greenburg Rd, Portland, OR 97223 (503) 245-1976 m CITY OF TIGARD, 1 2755 SW Ash, PO •• . � Box 23397 � , FOR STAFF USE ONLY g , g - 639-4171 ., r... I, 639 41 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) / CASE Na. y•� ; RECEIPT NO. 0 v ''' X11. d/ 3 1 `, APPLICATION ACC~YTED BY a V.,--4,----'-' 'Irl'r' DATE: I1" ,, 4.. •. r 1. GENERAL INFORMATION I Application elements submitted: oad & (A) Application form (1) • PROPERTY ADDI�SS/LOCATION S.W. Greenbttr� R .,.._, iii hwa'>• 90 W/Center. Street S1►+.' +., ti'4".i; /(B) Owner's signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LO` NO. 1100, 1001 & ,1000; (2S1-2AA . .,• fiy authoriz,ation : ,i(4.i' !`;,yr;': 5_r -''' j, 4. jt' Si , rr+afa (.C) Title transfer instrument 1 , SITE SIZE A proximatel• 1 A e _ D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* ,�rcu-'ha'..y'�rc d�;�, rL.lt�d ;, , AE) Plot plan (5 copies) { Swc� f/l d.,/(F) 'Applicant's statement ADDRES .- ,?.. .`...... PHONE CITY ZIP , (5 copies) a owner,'s G 'List property i APPLICANT'S Gra.more, Inc. _ ( One"-Z"�r"�'uco_Ci�r' enirer; ;within 100 feet (1) ADDRESS 103_QO S W«_.,,Gr ;en'bur ;,_Rd n PRONE .., ., ,) 245-1. .2;1,61 97223 Portland OR ,//(H);'Filing fee Portland/ � ZIP - � CITY _ *When the owner and the applicant are different rr cord the a licant must be the purchaser eI b t PP i . i people,a p - rization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: ;• I; or a leases in TSa�sa�en�.caofhtheiownerawttli written 1 , , from the owner agent -�--- + authorization. The 'owner(s) must sign this provided on Page tiro or FINAL bECISION DEADLINE��_ application in the space p p � x' pp P � A submit a Written authorization with this application. ' COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION. ti S IMMARY - --- i 2� PRaPaSAL The a Wte rs of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N.P.O+.. Number: { allow retail and `a,uto service use r Approval Date: l . together with car was�i l r .. rinal A pp roval Date: n Pl.ann��, Erlg.ineeting • t 11 • M 1898 (:11 OF TI WASiiiGNG' N COUNT?,OREGON • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION J' CITY OF TIGARD, 1 .7..).5 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 ' STAFF ONLY .�. Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR iTAF -_ ( 1 CASE NO. i RECEIPT NO f ` . 1 BY: APPLICATION ACCEPTED DATE: 7 l GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted. . PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION S,W, Green.Uur w'(A Application form (1) Road _ _. .� �.. .,-�. (BB) Owner's signature/written Highway 99 /Center Street +* °x °�, . t �► Owner's TAX MAP AND TAX LO NO. 1100, 1001 & 1000 (2S1-2AA , ..,<,!!!If ' authorization �. - Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SI ZE A PPro ximatel - AD) Assessor's map (1) , PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*, , AE) Plot plan (5 copies) s) •., , 'jr-- ,Z 4 � PHONE ,2�.`S� C� �r _ /(F) Applicant's statement • CITY ZIP (5 copies) 9 • • APPLICANT*Gramore, `Inc (G) List of property owner's • nco-Tn�enter, X410 PHONE / _ ______ within 100 feet On,e • ADDRESS. 1U3U0 S.We Greerib�� Rd. ' CITY Portland, OR ZIP 97223 /(R) Filing fee *When the owner and the applicant are different, eo le the applicant must be the purchaser of record � PP! P P . DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE possession with written authorization DATE D or a leasee in ossess ETE I g owner with written . � neowxYeroranaentof the - . from The ust sign this or FINAL DECISION i�ation� owners) m DEADLINE:application in the space provided on page ,� submit a written authorization with this application. COMP, PL /ZONE DESIGNATION: �-.- 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY I The owners of record of the subject property N.P.O. NuiriUer. request site deveioptient review approval to allow retail and Auto service uses; p l Date: ------- A •rov a k' to ether witl.- car wash _ ---- i r° Final Approval Date: Planning Enginee 'ing ;F ' l y • ,..la..,.. ..•t.....V,:^ ....,.nW:. ..i.N, ......,wf«rl:L....-kw...4-..;.+v..c+N .+Ml`.a:R,...vWt.' ..- .4 - ' 'd ,. � ' .� rh* 1895 m i,.,>�r., p ' ' ' . - CITY OF T1P . I} ,, - , --------- , : WASHp.. fON COUNTY,OR I n - .. COMPANIES 7.`h ' ',i S 7;;;4, f BARRY A.CAIN SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION GiRAMORE 111IC. I One Lincoln Center,#470 , CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 10300 S.W.,Greenbury Rd. (�' Portland, OR 97223 (503) 245-1976 1 , ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 539--4171 rr ICASENOO RECEIPT NO• r ' '- '` .. 'I I °, 5"' APPLICATION ACC ?TED BY t- Y'"' , . DATE: 2,--. i ; • ', :' ,. ' . I. GENE RAL INFORMATION Application P lira ti on elements submitted: ' - . Y ADDRESS/LOCATION ,,W. ad 4A) Application. form (1) _ i T 99 W/C Street Gr, - '-"' l• o ► r► #44 (B) Owner's signature/written PROPERTY Highway 9 r ,�,,A e ' -�=-- .. � % authorization TAX U� ''` • NO '1100, 1001 & 1000 (251-2.AA MAP AND TAX. L,0 � _----- ,��:r,�•'•�'' „l"'Siiitrr^,,._.. v -r.,, i� r II �t r(I,t►�+1 9.ti� 'br (;C) Title tratisfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE Approximate) 1 A” e AD) Assessor's map (l) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*o%Y,iggi�,7— r 4,,t„,,1�4.4,t,4 4 .. , AR) Pi o t plan (5 copies) , C .G ( ADDRESS 7- .� N/-�� G6 PHONE Z2.5 w L./ F) Applicant's statement , ZIP (5 copies)CITY '.n —�..—.____�_-. , E I; APPLICANT Gramore, Inca . ,,/�(G) List of property Omer s off' One Linco en, e-F 47CF` — 100 fee: (l ) .., ' ADDRESS 10300 S.W RGreen uRd PHONE within � 97223 Fitt fee Portland, OR Z Ip 3 Filing CITY. -._.._... ' *When the owner and the applicant are different . people the applicant t wust be the P-... urchaser' of record possession DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: or a leasee in ossessian with written authorization D • written from the owner or an agent of the owner with wr ._... . + n ages • authorization. The owner(s) sign g r' . application tion in the space provided on Page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authoriza tion with t his a pP licatioxd �. .. COMP: PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2.• PROPOSAL SU 1ARY 1 1 ' , ,,e,,.._ 1 , is of recor d of the. subject property The ovine ` request site development review approval to N.P.O.o P.O p Nu� ber. ' al low retail gild auto service uses' Approval Date: tagethr witli ar aS 1 W Tina l Approval Date. e. )Planttirt :.� � Engineerittig ..__ , .` ..r...�,. 0.- ... G n , • • 4. List any variance, conditional use, seuxs: Live Lands, (.)r other Land use actions to be considered as part of this app,Licatione 4-r.. 4tircr 5. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the , time you submit this .. application. • 6. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that maybe attached to or imposed upon the subject operty. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the condi tints and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot and plan, , transmitted herewith, are true; an attachments and exhibits Lran�,mitt applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application,, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, includihhg the policies and criteria� and understands the requirements for approving e. or denying the application. DATED this 7A.ti day of ifta4 6 19 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg husband and wife) of the subject property. ,c f t,. o e KSt:pm/C524P) ; • a a ) 1 1 , 'Y 1 (1.. .. ! ..µ. . h ..-. -I. ...t, titer .« a>r.,,...:.. .t . • d1YOFT1QARD WASNIN CY NN TY OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPLICATION SW Box 23397 127 55 Sir Ash, PO B CITY OE TIGARD, , FOR STAFF. USE ONLY Tigard,d, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 CASE NO. RECEIPT N0, APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: . PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION S.W.G ,_u Road_____.__ (A) Application form (1) ( ) Owner's signature/written and IIi 11 2 99W/ Center Street B authorization TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO 1100, 1001, n a 1000 (2S1 MAP) (C) Title transfer instrument (1) , SIZE A ro .matel acre. ,�., (D) Assessor's map (1) SITES rr ��4 r Nr�•x4T/r • PROPERTY OWNER/DEED R/DEE D UOLDER , / ?4� (E)) Plot plan (5 copies) g ADDRESS ONE 2,1S7;.94,7/ pry) Applicant's statement t CITY ZIP (5 copies) ......_______� --- •------APPLICANT* Gram _.__r�(G) List of property owner's c�r�:,znc ADDRE SS 3b0 S�W Greenb� r Rde PRONE(503) 2'45-W1976, within 100 feet (1) � CITY Portland, OR ZIP 97223 (II) Filing fee (4;200) • *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant most be the purchaser of record on with COMPLETE: ssess written ' P .. or a leasee in o COMP a authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE a t o f the owner with written authozlie owner or an agent The owner(s) mustsign this on Page. two, or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: authorization. space Provided application in the p P submit a written authorization with this application. COMP.: PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2 PROPOSAL SUMMARY. The owners .,e to the ty N.P.O. Number: e owners of record of the subject P P ec , rho e. P � a Variance request t. ermission fo ' following provision(s),` of the Community 17 A,ppro�ra]: Date: eu elo m as et Code,P Re tired Landsca in s er centa '.a fin. al Approval 1 o f Conditions: — --� Planning Engineering ' ,+i..id w�,., mA,.....--.4 L.n r.,w„l-«:.•, ,.,.,. ..b,.wl,iM+,.,. w.A7.:,, .«,+c:,,n,. n,.,,';:-Y».,,•u=t•»-4+L,'.::HSS,:A'ri...:+w.i_Yl"4t.s-l.k r.'. .aM-.. 4. List any conditional use, site de relopment review, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: 5ayetapnent Reve�r ,,, • 5. A •PP licants: To have a complete application you ,will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this I application. • 6. THE APPLICANTS) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The abovere uest does not violate any deed restrictions that may be ""°o or p roperty. T. attached to or im o�ed u on the sub`ect B. If the application, is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and { limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the '. based on this applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, applications may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, ,including'. the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. .'' DATED this day of { ! tt) ! SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. • ” fi (KSL:pqn/0521P)' 1; ! ,• �F,y , • ,. •, , „ , ,• ,.t,wJ..` .A..,an..V.,,. x,d wwa✓ILaa a ,t:GI1R•d.. 1-M t.. ��!vju:..4,x1,Wt:}2`C�.. a..ua.l,u.L.a;tdil^.,7.tl1..u:kz0%ar z ,uY..uwA?,.-'4 w+'."''+r«rd:a:'r,t,i fr. TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal ' 7-1,66 1 ' ,• P,O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684.0350 NNOtUc�a $EAVEFRTON,OREGON 97075 • Legal Notice Advertising City o f Tigard 0 0 Tearsheet Notice d, � 4.`"'1.)P O. Box 23397 t • • . 9 0 � 1'°� • 'Ti�Tgaaz^d� OR 0 '®uplicate Affidavit �f�. rlc lea • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION BUCATIC N STATE OF OREGON, 'ss. COUNTY OF INASHINGTOt�d, 1 l stephe.'ni,e li 1:J1)a,11,.er _ _ being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the T J,g a ri d Times „, a newspaper of general circulation as defined hi ORS 193.010 tl and 193,020; published at' r„-'?•-gard in thfa.: aforesaid county and'state, that the . Site Developmera,t Review NQta.,c_e ' a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for, 1 successive sand . ,ecutive in the following issUes: ti Mach 1 3 , r. ) , I /- . . it' / 4.4 la-- i' " Subscribed' Qd svvorii tb before me this_ m a.y c 11 i 3 , :L, 'yoAir . 1 '1" lull104.4, •i._,.. '�.�FI JT! I , Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 9/ 20/$8 "'IArI, ±1 '�n? *1 ',1 T«,rl§a l�q9 , �r; s.6 ,'t i, '. i' °R t 3 R 1 '1 `�t �� ti5 c "the 1, tza: p f'0'*Ott� i h.4ondIt one,4,request to dcve1o'a , ,8Olt-sq.i„ft. ,re'tail/a tO"'service'buildi g fa!irl'an `hi,ke iksatic ear wash.°\,j,'1 lso, an a•,p rcval witty:coEdltions for l'_yatrta`nce";to delete a 1portian tof' ;` public sya{de atk aloti ,center St.and th,taii ;lafl ndscaped area of 3.5% :.t / ' tie/,e;i1 V' ?.�" eq`wwrIcTd. !I..htl property Is hio eo C- (G.petal... (i imL`ler 4. 'lat).LOCATED,Corner of SW Greenhuirg?Ali and''Pacific H `VirCT ' 1 25112 lot s'�i.0 J0.1001.1arnd 1 f.00) _ �. I�' r�++. 1`4*`'``''''''``''''a4 1e 4�.1 a�..,µZa ,.`41.,*.,.1. ,�' i � t °� `V! �� V e ' '17,4'4',` j ''k, d I ,�•-+r 1 i ''f t 5 + w,.a,�aa t� ' 47 • , {,� .�.S°! ,ffri.-i � ,,. �+ .�+.r.,aw, i, 13N;x•.1,._. �;�Iy�,., I: � ri 1 o M ;K. a� s a 1 ''iT ,' r 1 h.t� � fI " `.1,'''%"' L',,,'it I dl a 4 :.1 4 , '/�St' 'i^ ,i. 1 45. ,:' _ ' ' f,rr d; * o q �X41 + 9°,eI,II! '`':° lr r r Q 'y ,r r 4,6„,, `4 ,e'� d � 1 � �+ �, ��;�� tit' � ' M� ; S � r� ' ,d y �lt e a da pt a d:!t di n� �t Za r t ,i deelaioa and statement'of conditions'an bid obtained,from the, 1 � SSW ,P.O.Box 23397 J;igard,'Orgon 97223. le.decis oa if be final ' o Mare I slid & n i� 64,,1086,Any p4 to the deotetoi may ti'p,�i ai ,. :,.ti.{ ..-.,.r:= u va.r a:,;z,>�'dBr'nxr•'+1.,x».,n lk,.+�.:.,.,r w r vw.7,nx,•,n.,.n,'+�.d,v.r..el,p , 611,§ a.f`§+Qdial ii fri'a io ,. a 'acodf'dannce With Section 18.32.2eb('A.I'dnd ection g 32{ 70of, e Coma„;', I u t Deve1opine thCod whic'h pts ov►ides that`a`writt en,ap• alrti1.>rt i m ef l Cd , , =1+ A 4' a i tt e t °e an nt, he deh,Iii.,/F., (,.,19, t� I 1 FX + ,,ti;,',. d. , ' • ( .A If i oaking op 1 `!f � .t' C I 160 ',aril, e1,�I 1,,,,,+,(,',!:,'. n '',:., . . J �.,'•4f.H„n.•..n-.�w....Gr....1+r-v+.:::..VM.-,....�..W..F'•r0.w n.M...ir.Y Mw :.-ar " ' +PUBU HEN COMPANY Legan 7-666 g Notice P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 ' BEAVEIRTON,OREGON 97075 1 , a« . Legal NoatUce AdVE rtiSirlg ,, �"" ,,,, e City of Tigard • li Tearsheet Notice 0,1 P. O. Box 23397 Duplicate Affidavit � ki/rO 41 Tigard. OR 97223 ' ° V iii. AFFIDAVIT OF PUB UCATRCll .-,,w , . .�t „ :k, r 4Yy�Y1�7�" cs, '. STATE OF OREGON, s wry pp COUNT' or WASHINGTO�l, ) ;,, Y d �_ � ''6 r . ;g dS *vq� t r`' ` ,w.a 1,0 G � .e � 1�,�„s�,:L1 B�", I i,. !td as.4s�E'� 'I"4 r: being first dale sworn, depose and say tl�at I am the Advertising ;',a,r, Director, or his prtinripal d6erlc, of the � r g�Y���'I��� � � a��� of eneral circulation as dbfirtipd in ORS 193.010 ,..6b04. r1 , a. a' ' .• ' ' a newspaper 93 his t T ga. d ._. .tin the ,� 0 F. �, and 193.0201 published a �—~—� a� aforesaid county and state, that the Y ',,,t.I '' ' ' Ptzll`1 , r. 7i_e_a,m.a.iig i�� d in the �'" ' ,°'��� � �`� ,..,�.�' o of which is hereto annexed, was blishe � ' need c y p "' ,4 apn p a c� 2 � .� successiv+s and ' entire tissue of said newspaper for 1 - 47r �''`� �� as ' cs nseuutrve in the following is �;0 sues, , *,z c, :� :'t'a 1 5 , § , , ,_,_, , , , 1 _1_ _' a. "t 0.+ ate • r � w 1I iz-,'"0,1 E t*".. t.... doo-illciEml ' '' f rk � �Lf Y before 0� 6a • Subscribed.a sworn h me thus �+ � (� �' ti � i`+`i «'�'"''�� � raj �+' �'14'15t:ti,,''4.. r � ���YVJVT' S lig, ��'I IN/ 'Y t5 lotary Public for_Oregon ,, 'i; f:i3 ,0 , 0 t .� p'my , OommisiortXplres; 9 2 Q/8$ , r AF'MiDAVI " i • , „ r . r .—...x.Jr..._, ..4.r .. •..•}.+Nrµ.., ......Jr4wnL n14-..,-. .%.n1--•I.h» ..,�41n14..n..irlrA. ..! •n I ' ' .x,..ItN ... J4+w^N• w-n.4n. .. . ,ar,w r Mr�^ .n • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING tb,` STATE OF OREGON` ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) LI 3� ! being f w.rst duly sworn, on oath depose and M say:' (Please Print) ,. .,• for That I am a ., .�� The City of Tigar , g -Ore Oregon. That I served notice of Public Hearing for Tigard City C ou.nc i1. of which the atta(thed is a copy (Marked EX ibit• ) upon each of the following named persons on the day of 1,98 , by mailing to � .bit B), each of Ithem at the address shown on the attached list Marked Exhibit said notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United States Nail on • the day of postage" prepaid. ,, 4. 1.1 gignatfe Irv:.. • Person who delivered to POST 'OFFICE day o f r l II. Subscribed aced sworn to before aae on the � � �" I. NOTARY PUBLIC OF OPJ CO • My CoAUroisgxon Expi 7 res ; (0257/)) t. A r ro + • N O T I C O F P U B L I C H E A R I N G NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, 28, 1g8 APRIL 28, 7:00 r IN T L1:CTURRROOM OF APRIL -- - - FOWLER JUNIOR RIGS[ SCHOOL, 10865 SW WALNUT, TIGARD,, OR.o WILL CAN/BIDER TIlE ^ i FOLLOW PLICATION: 1, 1 INC AF . w FILE N0.: SDR 6-86 OWNER: First BOX Trust � APPLICANT: Gramore„ Inc. PCJ` �0 2971 'C-1 l i' One Lin enter_# 470 ' caln C Portland, OR 97208 ' 10300 SW Greenburg. Rd. II • Portland, OR 97223 I° I T: By the City Council to review the Community Development st '� • REQUEST: , ,•s: to approve with conditions a•request , Director's Decision to app p to service building ft. retail/auto to develop a 6800 sq. ; Variance to delete a ++ and an automotive car wash;along aCenternStroet and to allow �, o portion of public side,.al1 a landscaped area of 13.57 where 15% is required. • LOCATION: Northwest corner of Pacific Highway and Greenberg Road , w 1001 ' and 1 100) . The property I 4' (��Cf� 2S 1 2AA lots 1800, � (.. / is zoned C-G (Commercial General) . (See P • i�a .. . See an reverse side i !' ,I � 1. THIS NATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE T�� PUBLIC` Ell.)�AI�IN(� ON NATTER I,T�i THE CE RULES OF PROCEDURES OF ' CITY COUNCIL. FESTIMON/ HAY SE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BB ENTERED INTO THE RECORD. DIRECTOR r ��E�ASB CONTACT T CI'L`X RECC�R,�ER bk P'XaAN$ �'U�T�R, �td�'0�lAT�O�, � ,_ AT: r .� 7. 5 S.W. Ave. ttt*rah; Or.Ern 0 7 2 2 3 �,?,� �i�9��►�.'�Z CITY OF 'iL ICAIe>D X2 of Ash�� Br�z��l�asi) (corner , (O272F) : � .., ... __•.. ,._ ... .., ,A«w,....,, .Ga• ._. _......,..»",„+,.... ...,•..�.....'1......v..-� wrt41„ L.... .,.......0 ...:.JM...,,,t+w"�i:»1... ."u..s.•.. r •.,,,,.,J...w,._.�: b , , ' •�J y ~+..i ,1 N i , i .,...--) �'"r. 1 ! ' q,\\' .iiikk so r,i ..-,04.ta,Q.,, _...t--- _i " . .„..,- ,,,,,, Pi.o'fr,,,,,, c..., T Mile '-'''''-'`'`'-' L „ le ---- 10, \ ,,,,,,, ,., \ ,.,,„,..- , _ t , , ...,..., i bit \ - a°?'' s.w.Y■ F . w Y ,. � ® �p7 0 �ww iJt r y rj ,. wilk i $4 ■ FF�� f p 1 IIIcq_riieau+E sT `^�.��-„�.,� .. ���• � ° 3�5r1�?wC :ii I f 4 G. .�NOObAFD ' ° 6ARk ' � a 400' , , t1:11, i, 4„, 4,cz,„ 4,,, 44, .. / ,/ .,,, -,,,, ,,,. ,,,, -,,,. - %, 4111100,`‘=?• ,-.' . if i ",,,,•>\ . . ” ff 4 /) r 440 ' 's..4°,i,.4,, ,er '„ • Ill 4 0.. ., \ ,)\), c„,,, \ ). , .,,..,,, , ,,s<S/ .,,, �, y�.. r,ali 44/11 \\ ,, i . � St.to pad / �' ....,,�J -^ "�,. �,'r �r ' M„, , ,410-' 't 4sitir'''',, . ito4 t# ',. ' 'rot' �.3 fr4\& 4 ' CIVIC m + � , 5 ` CENTER \.„, j 'f4 c+ ,+°” 4/'saNInR (�p i ti f ' w al' r tiTAAHfi ■r arr ar _, / mr t„. ,,, .'•q1,,t - , \,,,,,.. -,,,,,,)/L- , ..‘," , • • -- ,,- -....1, , ,./ ;, •‘..,,, . . , , „'..,,',, , .,,,,, -,, ,..,K,. .,.:r. . . E..p.,=,.0.9. . . ...„, ......,... ,, , , - . ,..„,_.f' ,1/4 iC,w/1W-1"''[.,t,' , - ,.+1 fT>,�1I k.. 1 + ( r �Yr , rr r NI'...l.'''''.41N sr -� ».� 11 y �I 1 g....__ 1 �'�...�:�I. � ..� 1 �. O ! j 1 .,..T.•�..' 1 1., 1 '' p µ4F' , I; z °, `�t i �,u + lc�.'., I .� \ c .aNr r 1 J L, " ”' , (Y '..L•w.+... ,,„ I t w� ♦.'I° '.I" M y 1 / +"r `4"r.'I. tn; .,•1 tiK„t. „'..,;r t tt.14 "aE Il'1. •0 4 t P � ) IT 14'�y, a ; 1 i . 4 z 't ,i' ` r 1 • � ' lac ft i. ��' ' ��, .����Yr. �ORIF1'��� '.'., ..�_ t�T2_ r l W .."..'.. .P w. M '.« .�. .� � i �.���r ,^'S,4,1�rlkM� 'k� i I a«rR�, . r• � d i 1 + a r,.„ 11'x. s ! ' i N ��',t t 2-,.: 'h). F „a , i 1 tt ,l' tt G. 1. 1 ! ''' ! $ / \1 •• a. '1 1 IuT„1.. 1 ,r L.t,},wtiM{.�tC'W '' ' j. y ...4 ..{.: ":w { 1t".'N1'�� is r ., 'I' ( w -..-ya .9 i Y •k" 'C°'-” — \, (}r,' v w°t µ o,t t�Nw I: Q'� w ,.f,.i ka 11 kt4 A� ni pie �, ' 1 .vr �l 6 a L"-1***n.L "'� n . � �' r. L.�. fll pT L.1 S,�.• Y �" i wa i T \'E, .� z ',r�1 »�Wr"l rCti� 3Y� d� ' 1" 1 ""'t �" .�"„, ' ,� � � T R + � ' { 'T y ::: ' 4I..., 1 +i T ' (fx is 144 1 ,. .l a . , i� 4 ,. � � ,ti + I y i •1 ' ( v e rr i 1 �. yt,° .1;,-.,-- 4, 5t w 1 x 1 p I c 4 W-,, r • r.t' I T' ^ ti '"/r t „C 41 , '4'!'.. ' i y , w• t I 9r (�1 1 ' t r w 1',,Y, .' T ( } a 1 k .1� ,.� \ • .,'' • • ,,�.,�,,..»..,....�..•Mme-,,. BUSSETT/MASTERS/n l SSE" 1 Inc.i 0th I,incoLn Center 1/'470 14680, SW 141st 10300 SW Creenburg Rd. Tigard, OCR 97223 Port [Id; OR 97223 • Rr\RGHAUSEN CONSULra N ENG. INC BUSSETT • as TRUSTEES as TR US 6625 Sough 190th Suite 102 US NATIONAL BANK a Kent, Washington 98032 2004 NW IRVING • w PORTLAND OR 9 7209 First Interstate Trust B 2 71 T 11 r�1 d OR 97208 ? l?0 ox 9 an Igo f ,ITKEN R. . •�� 15705 SW ALD'ERB ,ROOK D TIGARD OR 97223 INT2 1. HE T� n nter S 9 25 • TIGARD OR 972 23 FIT LE1� 8945 SW Center Tigard, OR 97223 . , . ; gPRZLKE T T 11040 SW 119th „" • Tigard, OR 97223 RUS 53' $985 SW Center St Tigard, OR 97223 • I ` bAVz 11470 SW Greer►bUrg Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 W r • ' Ala ...Fi•L,Ai6«.Nu.i'.n! ,.,u...... ....J.wi.3-:.V .+. � , M C.. w;t!1'l 1,L r t. 1.n r S T TICARD COURT 1':L',.41�Sl1P .Inrl■t: 2 Box 346 1,r.u s to 18143 13R:ETTA IY. DR SW 11ILLSBORO, OR 97 123 S l AT ALL WA 98166 . IS1 35U1 251 2AB 1001 LOCKW00la/% SERBS i`1ARTELL E1:AHLE1'� • 10730 SW 85th Ave. 2610 So Shore Blvd. PO BOX 23412 `rIGARD OR 97223 Port1 and OR 97223 LAKE OS[d1G0 OR 97034 y 251 2AA 602 I 1' VE RMILYE CALL,% ARMSTR0I�G/AR2�iSTRO.,xU DAVIS DAV.LS 11470 SW Greenberg Rd. 9209 E MISSION SUITE A 11272 SW CAPITOL I:�:W'Y PORTLAND OR 97219 �' '� g , WA 99206 I : ' ITS.Tigard OR 97223 SPOKANE, NORTON MCDONALD'S CORP. PO 13OX 23186 PO BOX 66201 T.igard, OR 97223 AMF O HARE AIRPORT C1:7ICAGO IL 60666 l• ENTERPRISES NORT.HWOOD REALTri! CO INC.WALKER/% F B F & F EN • PO BOX 32186 BY SONS 544 TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 20 INC+ � 541,.. BOISE ID 83726 • KLOCK PA.YhESS DRUG ,,TORE S NW INC • • % M S SANDERMAN % O{REGONPIOI`NEER SAVING LOAN AS ' 7650 SW Fairmoor St. 401 SW 5th Portland, OR 97225 PORTLAND, OR 97204 ASSCICIATL+'S �' ANDERSON MONTCO PO BOX 23006 PAYLESS DRUG _ 97223 9275 SW PYATON LN xIGARD, ,OR 97 ,, DTI T :L'SONVTLLE OR 97070 . I , r . BISSaTT HOYT /BY US BANK K OF 14595 SW BULL MTN ORS BANK PROPERTIES D V PL —3 TIGARD OR 97223 PO BOX 4412 PORTLAND, OR 97208 • 1<.LEBE/7 B—B—B 'PROPERTI1 5 TIGARL) PROFISSICAtAL CENTER PC) BOX 23838 PO ;BOX 23006 TZARD OR 97223 , TIGARD OR 97223 UU L i C D 0 AL BxSOET`T 8995 SW Centel NW TkVTNG ST 2004 9723 2 0 Tx.��.�cl,� OR • PORTLANb OR. 97209 r ,4 181' 35DC 100 HOUGH 9045_ . 51 CBNTEk 8T T A iVL' o TIGARD OR 97223 .. k ,n4J ,.wUu:.n ,.w. =mA+aLhdMw. 1e.wS4 : F,u.. . ' R UESTS FOR COMMENTS f / . DATE: February_21 2_ 1986 44. FROM: Tigard Planning Department 3 S1)R 6-86 & V 5-86 Request by First Interstate • � - y - Trust to develop a 6800 sq. ft. retail/auto service building & an automatic car wash. A variance is also requested for deletion of a portion of public sidewalk along Center St. & to allow: a-landsca ed area of 13.5i where 15% is required. The property is,zone C-G (Commercial General) Located corner of SW_Green,bur': Rd. ^ Pacific Hwy. `1WCTM 251 2AA lots 1000, 1001 , & 1100). Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your •evi.et. From , information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. we need Your comments by March to comment on this application, y y If you wish 4th 19_ x.+ You may use the space provided below or' attach a se arate letter'to return your comments xf V€2u arse unable to respond by, the p . d below with your comments and above date, s soon as ` please phone ei�th writing contact noted possible, If you have any confirm your comments g questions regarding this matter, 'ccntac the Tigard Planning department, P.O. Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR I' 97223, Phone: 639.4171.' t t •. Box 23397, burn , ' • , y STAFF CONTACT; Keith Liden ;I. PLEASE CHEF!{ THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the , the proposal and s to it, nd have -no objections • I , 'y Please contact of our office, Please refer r to the enclosed letter" comments rotten --- -�- ---� a _ L -r ' Name of Person Ccmmentihig t Phone No, K L " m - „,,,;...w, w....:,..•.,., .,. .: ,..,....._,..... ._. ,. .... ......... ..i. 1. .... • A '1....1+:..-.n...i....1.:.r.r..n,il-.....�:..'.....a..._ .«-r.-...i..44...+...:.-..•I...l '..:.rY...L.r..a.w.r.�....�A w..Hrw4�.'.i.�wA........,.-F..::...w�..�...+�-.1»-w4a.i•...r..a3 iL ...n...iJ rr.:lrh4 n.:..rh..w.�.vw.lr:+.lawn..l.nn�'.0.......,rrr.J..«.r.......�...--r.L�..y.r....[}.l.-,r+�4::..f.r.�M.�.i.�2�:'.�i:.c:.'..w.aJa.-.�rb•� �.-MIa:.�.w.Y. .+-..+a.w.�..+.ra,..u,..w�.,.r«..,+::w NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALl». APPLICATIONS I / NPO No• '"? . I /.A4-.S) CPO Ns 2. CITY DEPARTMENT; A6,Duilcling I:nsp actor Parks & Recreata,ori Board "..;ity Recorder Police /Eng1rteeriri .Raridy AL__(......, c tl~l !r I I II S " .,I L DISTRICTS II /Tuiatiri D,` 1T `Pi..,fi�P� 1 R,F,P, Schorll. Dist. No. 48 (Beaverton) Washington Co, F,D, No, 1 __ school Dist, No, 23J (Tigard) " 5 T igard W.D.W ' tiG: 171.../3t. Other»»„„« • I ; Metzger W.D. . I . I ; 4. AFF. EC T D Ju RISDI:CTXONS 1 ., I , Boundary Commission Wash. Co. Land Use & Trans, Dept. I i City of B averton Brent Curtis I r »» METRO Key a.n Martin Planning Department Other I _ . 5. STATE AGENCI1 S . I a :x.cI O S :rrt OT DOGAM� . , Engineer Division of State Lands I Board of I+lealtl«i »�..,». Cr,t�n»rc�:1 DE pr, «, M.1.1, Park Highway Div, Lee Gunderson /ILL:;- Fish & Wildlife • • Parks & Recrea, Di.u, (ODOT) L»CDC subdivision Supervisor PUS», w., Dept. of Energy tt'ire Marshall Dept, of Ermai,rorn, Quality ,..._. .w»., Other ,w_., ».»w 1 w W 4 !� ,L»ih� j . E ��.` IAN.r 1 s Other .,,._», Corps rr'f” fµr'Ig i rwwuu«w..«.0 _,«ww,..._.,»» � .�:.».«�.„ Post Office , 1 I r SPECIAL CL:f11 J x,ku«S (yener '), `I"ei.e hone ✓ Port land General t.�,rctric "5‘,18., Pacific l Northwest Dell »»».� ,.� l)tl•lar �»» I N0 r•thweist Natural is ;; (pill/O2..157P) • fir; •WJ•yr • r,, _ r /,p 11 d M .n ° PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO W SDR, 6-86 AND VARIANCE V 5-86 FIRST INTERSTATE TRUST SITE DEVELOPMENT REVT.E The Director has approved with conditions a request to develop a 6800 sq. ft. retail/auto service Building and an automatic car wash. Also, an approval with h conditions for a variance to delete a portion of public sidewalk along Center St. and to allow a landscaped area of 13.5% where. 15% ,is required. The property is zoned C-C (General Commercial). LOCATED. Cotner a u Greenburg Rd. and Pacific 11wy. (WCTM 2S 1 2AA lots 1000, 1001, and 1100) . 10...CL. .V ,.../ ilimmoni, El .›..." Ir ' . Mail ' 1 1‘eTt.FA .--,...0, ! 1111•1111‘, II f ..:.,:z.1 0 ! 11,1'441 1'44 b Mv,,,,l'4,4, /&,,ik ts • 'w.Y► l .Ai, t 4iP .„,s,yG 3S 0 - ''' --.,% ll'P It / , , i of facts, decision and statement• ent of conditions can be ° The adopted finding ng ° . Ash,.. P.O. ,`• obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall. 12755 SW . decision shall. be .final on 3-25- b , Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The da peal. this decision in accordance with 1985: Any party to the decision may appeal t2 290 A and Section 18:32:370 of the Community Development Code, recta, , l C a x p within 10 days after notice is which Provides that a written a....peal may be filed • • of an �appea�. is ;2 ,9l� P.M. 325--86 , llbe0thN sent. The dead appeal � for fi�,xn+,�ava, yen and se . 1.9 5. The hearing on an apps i publish . r , 2260P Coy dmj y. r. ty,1 i,, i. 1-"'` .'k,'#r.1:Nr. Iw ,, 1r'.,.. r r"#', Y" 4.54'11 r.",�Y rt ': jf'*', ' ' M r_ . +. nN�w. ail 1+,«'Y e. " .+ .•t«% Y IFS. . 0 .. A ° i w-w�- r 161r. x x' (rvtur�� _ pl ■ 11 U BARRY GRAMORE INC . r, 2S1-2AA-1300 Aitken, James N. and Nancy L. 15705 S .W. Alderbrook Drive Tigard 97223 1400 Heintz, Peter W. and Mary A. 8925 S.W. Center St . Tigard, 97223 1600 Finley, Richard M 8945 S.W. Center Tigard and '97223 1700 c/o Prickett, Leland Paul 11040 S.W." 119th L err r Tigard 97223 1;. ''s 1800 Russell, Timothy M. and Nancy L. 8985 S.W. Center St . Tigard 97223 1S1-35DD--4500 Davis, Leonard S. & Margaret M. 11470 S.W. Greenburg Rd. Tigard 97223 r1 � 5100 Bissett, Stephen. Robert, Christine/David , , ,. -. Masters, 1 Linda Bisaett hr, } 14680_'s .W. 141st '., Tigard 9 x223~ tier. " ' 5106 Bussett, Janet E. and at iana 1 Trustees I.r The US National , Bank a s '� 2004 N.W. Irving St [; Portland 97209 a I Y r.. •} • +H.n.MIra,M-w+rrr +:�,r A.a «irFY:. -rLA,k..... r..b4-M:..„u:Iw..-�,1.i.t.+w+•..�SrW+.�.w...•.-.. re. .,.... ii11.2.st.2 A- ,," r ' rk SEE MAP il;II 1'4,, a rJ DC 1 3 .. 200 - t5 1 �� r IIIIIIIII 3,/8AG•' �� SFE . II. ' k w. 'I iI .\ , ,�,t max, ` ,5. 1 I .- 400.' / 4b DIVIDING LINE N1/2.AND SI/2 / III \ �I 4 JAMES HICKLIN DL C. 37 160 . \ Y I1CJ0; w , 1.14 ACS ."� ', a• 6 , IC.S.No•t30'92) -'\t, ,,. . ttl \ N - ' , /, ^Q ,• ' lr�pt \ 70d \ .3/AC.3 \ 3' i004-- , •r ; \ � 43AC4 / \ Illy'.••-',.' IIi �IIe99 \ \ • Ali ,f•.�'-111 I 9 I �' , -� � g ti, \ 30 .� l�lllh. �,4� 1i11+111 { y 11'1T LCJ `� 9 �`� , w ■ \ 2 l' 11111 1111f 1 \ \ , 9` y y 11111iIII X 1If111ao1 s �` 1 1`' .*�,. ,, �r� 7 h, / 28,.• ,, l�llll Illlh°`� C�', ". '�/ -" ICI ..' 111 Aft ,) fr. { I ! . ''' ''' ' ,- ' c,� � �� ,�.,�� 8 ,� 27? ,� ,, 11111111 r'� 1111111, ��� -------?111 13 , ,` 1 ,_ ,� ' IIII ›og Il�lilil h ,,.III,111)11:/� ii,,, J 00 V 14 10 v 25 s 'hill l // Il1li! `" ; M h1 `, rr ` ,, 1 \ -$ IlI�ll1l`°' Ill1llll ' rel2e I5 ,"� �1 \ '0, \„ � 24 \ r�lllllll i(/ 111lll go2.5 gas ' , , M r . ' h II; IIII, c ti ti lll�lll � IIIIl11ll � c�sO;iD, ,' � . ,,/ 5100 i 1 2 .y ° 12 ,, ,12 AC, III ty�� II ,A,g 903 "s •�. 906 '.'1 4 �' 52Q0\�,t \ ,R' 111111 4 ., `+ ► 1111 l I l 111 '- `�' h , p .!' r I ,� I r r 20 I,II t� ,. a Mx� ^ i I � � f �, t' , ,.,,r'� 5300 ,, Illlllil Illllilll 2 01 pF° . r- .. /i 16 ,/ 19 O8AC IIl1lll '11$11 4 c. , /55QGt�, „ 11111, 111111. 0� `-, ,404C,8 "°-,..1„,.�` ,- 1 CSI y�i �I kh an I Ir' 1 W .. 1 23 2 0 • M1 1 .r M a” I1 Ill _ - c".v. F,r q 1111111 ►II 26,1c, �$hf0� r�.. .` goo �.. 17. II ,1111",„� (C S, t 00'12263) _ ` �1, 111 I ) 4 6 '"'+`° "v ( �'` ` �''� v ''/b III '� IJ 3 -(11,, �• ���sy �4��,. Illllll�., 1111 40fJ0 �,'� u ��,�© s� G III 11111 7 '° 2300 � ' ,/ `` _ate . 1 c",,,..L ,, ,/ 11111 1) 18.14c'' ,'"4 / 17.AC 4°� ,-'2�d c _ i' •'•�/ II 111,,✓ I a , ”_ vd • $III 111 , � •� e+r C,S,1 t77t - Ill �r III v o /' (r 2 �`�� lull ���' � ��� � 1 �a �0 'a �— '' g 0 r o �• '°- 11 III 1 .,, • _-. (111 � //- `4,0 ✓,��ISy'./>\,, ,R.b., I-,, ,,„. i ,,,, , ' , '''t , /.4, ''.1 �/ to ,✓,\d y f'r \ a .+,fi ry G ° a 70 re • r -'1,'"'''l \ u ti p / ,1 . ,:,,i''',1' r • • i `� �6�0''lilt S89 15, 161.82 134.25 ' it 5o N x ' ik,, m It 2000 4"' II 8 �, r •,..,'a,,,i■■,_Raierllitamr. -4 N 2001 r 1 �°Zts , fill(� '%`'///// 4 0.,'"//// :� �.. r w�A h /,,32 AC �ky5•� �3 . . D I7 AN r •+i I 425.9 � I I 7 3 0 2 8 ,�I /405 Ac. (C.S,No.11'745) hh 1�;'I X a° I'll • , ,a • . • �1 o\ N c �,, °�III 56i.$g h I 1 w dell) ti J Q' C 6 8 3`," • d ti �i., \0 r, S, 2 . �, �.S, 5283 ' a.°' j� .P O. °5� /�g t!, II S870 36.E {z 'c 47 I ^tn %4.• � (° • 191,16 gyp. ,/ 4,16,3 _` .o 3301 '� ';' 1 $68.57 m %. x� ���9 ti 6,464c ITIAL'POINT \� / { ar rwsi 4400 g3 . ,t) % .,,,... .. c.s (\ \.,) / I n ®2'92......, in 0 44.06 ''''',' \ '.''''; ,./ ,-) r, b■ '/-- .09gc 44 �a S i� g ti h' ' \ \ ,,, 1 G' 67:25 �, m- N / OV �L` 90 6s A 4,a e Mrs C / ` ' \� 2 `s f C'.%CO w x WO ,•4\ \D / • , , u C,5, 5327 N ::1,C.S. 10044 i� �PPa, m 1 \m .c , r 440.1 a n �,. .,,� o ra 81,17 •' `� k.,... YJ ■ ..,,- ,■ : ' ` ,. to 4 4403 �o am;) 5 , 0 44 01 r?',. 3 20 A c, h. .9 \ - ,3D Ac, h, =o ; \ �2,, \0 ; W tV N i' , a • l i -t 0 i \ `0 ,4 co t.A 1 Q CJ. 04 r : Q 0 5 ~ CA •� , If 1 031 ` �. � a , '7, 440 h , i t,:,a'� 9a�o a. d'd 2�V9t e R e,6 n, t : c, o ''R C S 1266�^ n, 0 v Z° O(C.S.No,l2d77 o � ()0 \\n I 1+1 a Nth t �6 rs'���, � �s®1 � 9g ' : ::J 4 ...I t.47,x, x - „,q ,>-///////l/. ' 1 ,; .., � � °- 'Y Pti \ p �i iA�r o. +�` 1�'�Y %�/!////lll� ;I� . ✓nom liiill11ff . I s 0 C ' 'ate ��+ ,,,,,\,,•'\,, ,� p(t,'16 I sir ��a h ffr•� ,xa ` p, SEE ti rr `L b `ctr_ � �,J !a ¢' 4�%psi �G�BAL; ■9 ,° ,I • u .'' iSt 1,,33 I. !,;:.,411Y M ' 1.w ,I�:r.4.,.1w a c.H;:I�...s ,r,.N'lx.�l a. .,J..J,...,t.. ,.u�' M,.L., .,�WU.-+4r.Aw+...rx•11.+L"w*t�.... x,+.�«.X...n '-�i1 , ai.7aa .aormliJbi 41::11aar .ma.' 3', Ar016axR Date Time._.. .- ._ t :. WHILE YOU WERE Q U'Y iVl • l'...4.. • ll P �hone_ .. ` ' f PLEASE CALL 7ELEP1(ONED ilk t a . I RETURNED YOUR CALL WILL CALL AGAI N . I WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH • .3Ltrrx.ca .a33 C 'plu.aa;t r', C:Ozse, e::t►aea. 1 essa�e Date E , W. IM E y U W .. t Y pd-57 r A If Phone :' \ TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL ` _ t ' RETURNED YOUR CALL WILL CALL AGAIN 1 ANTS TO S.E L RUSH r r w I , n l i --. p d A - 41 5T ' '. y`, • { e.,.) (., .. / 7 ,(.7 1 H 1't7 ek M1 ,.wl•. �t...h.,.-I.0 .<I.til,..,d'.ww,. ...,k.. wdF.. _....-.sa..; �.—....:.:ow... 1 -i„r:,....w .., r , • SDR FILE CONTENTS • SEE ALSO__ , RIGHT SIDE LEFT SIDE I' r Property Owner list Assessor Map/Maps/Preliminary Plat ed in envelope) be attached F�e) Request for comments _egal Description/Deed Agency/NPO Red o Letter of Authe ?zation:..davit of Publication/TT ' . Application arrative/Correspondence with Applicant °OAffidavit of Mailing & Posting blic Input w with copy of mailing labels Notice of Final Decision enc /NP y respondence after approval APPEALED TO PLANNING COMMISSION ._ .� Date PC Minutes {=ORWARO' CALLED UP TO CITY COUNCT.' Date CC Minutes 6- S- 1 c.� N C Resolution o Ordinance �' r nan sUMMARY p, Approved �..�. Denied' f Date Dale f ; square rootage.Saxe of Lot Cross c�u No� of Phases - 1:2r'CV Special Setbacks • Residential . Ccmnte� 4 a shdustria1 kL/d j/(OCi i6P)R/4/8'7 1 • • I.. 4 '11114 Lek November 10 1987 oR a r ' Barry A. Cain Gramor Development, Inc. One Lincoln Center, suite 275 10300 SW Greenburg Road Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Tigard Auto stop (File No. SDR 6-86) Improvement Performance: Bond Dear Mr. Gain: writing this letter regarding the release of bond monies for the Tigard ', I am wr g g Auto Stop site improvements. r ' Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code delegates decision making authority to ,� The company was issued a the Planning Director or dAsignated staff membe r. permit, , Code. The Tigard City ' r Tigard the i ermit, with bond required, under the provisions J.ths of the Municipal Code.council has approved all provisions within � for accepting and , . Ma responsible P g k respect to Title 18, the Planning Division is respons improvements. As « performance and maintenance bonds for on-site releasing performanc Senior Planner in the Division,, I am responsible for these acceptances and 7 5 18 of the Tigard rd releases. Therefore, the Tigard City Council, through Tit , g_... Municipal Code, and the Planning Director has given me the authority to release these bonds Therefore, I am authorizing the release of the c2plete bond which is valued I, at 3,000.00 (Bond No. P591599). A copy of the agreement is attached. further questions, please contact me at 639--4171. : have ftt �. If you should av � sincerely, 4; • Keith S. Laden , Senior Planner cs/17S0D Attachment ;a r,1vd, p,C�r Bost 23391x11gard,Corot ol`i'97223 (503)6 �3�255W'Roil� .� , r x14' • 0 , y ' • 1 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,Fir,.J.w,,,:.,,,,,,.:«::.i,Y,-n,,,w..,.*...n,,,,,--.:w .S1n.,,,,,,,.yy.r,,w,—,,,,,.,.xe,.f:.11.„ 4.,,, ,.:,,.t+..u.....,.-5,.wd ,,,., ,..w1r.�:i,Nma,,,,l:uawx..w , .,o.,.w. .;■ 1* a u., w�„ ,.Mai, .,:4:,,..-w..ww+µ:.L.,M:....,u.:an,-+-+w .�,,,.ruk.=+.., � �» ' { GRAM OR DEVX+; ,fJ PMENT, INC. :' ''` One Lincoln Center, k275 ' .��. ..�. 10300 S.W. Crt'eenburg Road , ,,OMPANISS Portland, OR 97223 r } (503) 245-1976 „ 13$ . , , ii:) %c\\\, c1/41k,c) • .i� November 4, 1987 ' • Mr. Kieth L'iden City of Tigard • P,O. Box 23397 Tigard,• g , OR 97223 RE: Landscape bond release for Tigard Auto Stop. , dear s Please find enclosed a copy of our landscaper`s assessment of the landscaping i' at the above mentioned center. The two rhododendrons which, are dead will be ez the ivy can be o�cpected. to' replaced immediately and accordh g to our landscaper y Y l completely cover the retaining wall within 2 to 3 years. I trust this is all you need and will release the bond at your earliest convenience, . If you have questions please don't hesitate to call, Thanks, ' 1 y any � 1 Since,. yours, Gr ,, ,or lDe, el. ,anent, Inc.- . Barry A, Cain A, Cain f , BAC,hc • telostt r e �1 j . jc iviemb are of ititrhdkibtai Couritll afar kois ofSh n i h r ' SEATTL.E 0 POktLAND « DALLAS 0., PHOENIX • .r ar f , p,� r� � r fir,`t , aS , a °ni .� ,.aµ.,„,.�µ....r::•....w .�.+., na,...i......:..-..a., ..:...1a.do iatH::,y.,+....;:,.w..au.::rk•,.,....,..a:.c.u.a+.e:a,.s,�r...,,...,.;;:ya,-aa,arar..�_v,.w.�«..e�ri.� «..0+A9 J , .Irk. , , _ C • . . . . ' ' ' '.. ' ''.. . •:'1.A•NDS APE .,. , . .. , . .., . , . : • V , . , " . .0, , { October 27, 1987 .. • . Mr. Barry Cain ,, r Gramore Development ' ;' e,I One Lincoln Center ° • . „ 10300 SW G.reenburg Road ) ,[;"r• 2 �9 1" 7 r , •' ort?and Oregon 97223 xe., ` ti 7 Re : Auto Center on Greenburg and Hwy 99W %"' N Dear Mr. Cain: Per your request, I have visited the above captioned a ' . site to inspect the landscape. r` It is our feeling that all the plant material is alive ' rind well except for two rhododendrons. The ivy at ne u spreading and already starting to base of the wall. �.s sere attach itself and grow up the wall . The trees have some }',, dead Food but are all alive and should do well. If you have any questions, call. uestioras, please give me a 1 Sincerely, ,. („/'-'-''- e._e....4.,-.__.1_,...,___ , . M1 err , • Richard D. Akerman President R D � ew l� , • 1 PORT I N OFFICE x A, A w. 1 075 S,V ,U�pfgO hSLgRYft„TI D,C 224 y,,.... x 4; ( O3)6445O + S EAT E OFFICE Y 1.i A..i 3 1,..7,4....i P.C.130X 58846,S8/\71.5. UVVysHI Cii-oN ]8188 4 A i,..L i i Y.i 6 i..k Y, (21)6)226-5864 ' , r rr C .. ` ! , X 15 1986 . INSURANCE COMPANY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE,FEDERAL WAY'',Wr?SHINGTON ' BOND NO. P591599 , LICENSE/PERMIT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, GRAMOREI INC. , as Principal, and PLANET INSURANCE COMPANY, a • corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington and authorized to do ' . ' business as surety in the State of Oregon, as Surety, are held. THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, as Obligee, in ,• • and firmly bound unto TH ,• THOUSAND ($3, 000. ) lawful • penal sum of THREE +HOUS,t�ND A1�D gN0�a0meDOLLwe1a and truly to money n " chpY r y States, which , t we bind ourselves, our w , , made, the United Sel�res, out heirs, executors, administrators, • be m d one of a. assigns, jointly Y severally, firmly by these successors and assn ns, joir,tl and sevea�all . presents. WHEREAS , said Principal has applied for an Occupancy Perri a Pacific Highway, Tigard, --- g r for a building, locate d at 12035 SW Pa ; Oregon; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with issuance of said Occupancy Permit ,' the City of Tigard requires a bond to guarantee installation of • landscaping at 12035 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard. 7 � that T OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH tha .,. A • if Principal shall install landscaping as required by City of . NGW, r�IERE�'ORE r THE CONDITION P Tigard ordinances, then this obligation shall be void. otherwise effect. . . force and. • to remain in _full SIGNED, sealed and dated this 11th day of December, 1986. , • • GRAMORE,INC. '^" Principal 7 PL A6 1. T INSURANCE COM.PAN ' ��� Surety .1, i Scott ' Attorney-in-Fact ° SDFµ142c� I , . ,, 1 N W A AD OFF , ® , N / • . PCoVVEFt OF ATTORNEY• . I KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,That*he PLANET INSURANCE COMPANY,'corporation duly Praerlized under the IaMs of the State of Wisconsin,doses hereby make,constitute and Appoint i�. , CYNTHIA L. 1 SCOTT of SEATTLE, WASHINGTON- its trios and Itiwftel Attorneywn•Fact,to Hake,execute,veal and deliver for arid on its behalf,and as he act and diesel • ANY AND ALL BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS OF SURE'TY"SHIP--- .• f to the extent as if roach bonds and undertakings and other writin • and to bind the PLANET INSURANCE COMPANY thereby�a ally and t tam* gs such officers,dnd hereby ratifies and confirms all,five i�said Attnrney�si-in-Fact may do SURAA��"~'��PAIeIY and sealed and attested by one other of - in pursusnae hereof. in the nature thereof were signed PLANET I kablbgator+y goad by an Executive 33fi'bcer o ft This Pokeior of Attorney is granted under and by authority of Article.VII of the oy- • of PLANET INSURANCE:COMPANY which became I ' affective September 2L 1981,which provisions are''now in full force and effect,reading as follows; 1 — , . ARTICLE VII EXECUTION OF BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS ' h, • 1. The Board of Directors,the President,the Chairman of the Board,any Senor Vice Presidarit,any Vice President or Assistant Vice President or,other officer deaignxted by the Board of Directors shall have poyver and authority to(a)appoint Attornays-in-Fact and to authorize them to execute on lraefralt of the. Ccdrnpany, bonds n revoke the power authority vent to him, writings obligator,/ in the nature thereat,and and undertakings recognizance:, contracts of indemnity and other ornry•in Fact at any time end k pow4 y i (b)to remove any such Att . « 2, Attorneys-in Fact shall have power and authority,subject to the terms abed limitations of the power of attorney issued to them,to execute and ,.•" ' Povwrr gown deliver on behalf of the Company,bonds end unrdertakings,rerognizanoes,contracts of indemnity and other writings otolbgatory in the nature thereof, 11 • gyp recognizance's, i gs obligatory ry 1 ' The corporate seal is not necessary for the validity of any bonds and undertakdn nizabnkxs,contrt>rt s of indemnity and other wrbtin obli , in the nature thereof, _ 3. Attorneys=it Fact shed{ have power and authority to execute affidavits required to be attached to bonds,re nizant es,contracts of indemnity 'or other conditional or obligatory undertakings and they 1114111 also have power and,uthc►rity to certify the financial statement of the Company and to e Cobripany or any article or section thereof, , copies of the By-Lars of the • This power of attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following Ftesodution adopted by the Board of Directors of PLANET INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting held on the 79th day of Idiarch,1912,at which a quorum was present,and said Resolution has nc►t been ', amended or repealed; "Resolved,that the signatures of such directors and officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such power of attorney • ore g facsimile, attorney or certifirntite Waring such facsirndie signaturtc or facsimile veal shall be velideand binding upon the Company�end sany such power so executed and certified by facsimile signs turns and facsimile seal ' 11 b valid and bindin u n the Company in the future with respect to any bond " is attached," � '' rtaki to which it i • aka be � po or unda, EFIEOF,the P AN T INSURANCE COMPANY has seal to : IN WITNESS WH 129t L caused these pr�ntt t signed b its Vice President,and its corporate se® be hereto affixed,this dry of J a n u a r l o o • PLANETINSUR` ' INSURANCE COMPANY 1 Vice President Char'1e5 B. Sschmalz ' Washn � i . on STATE OF �' ' COUNTY OF King Charles B. So ma • 1� • If t Is 2 9th daV of January ,19 86 rsonalty a viand tin me known to be the Vbce President of the PLANET INSURANCE COMPANY,and ecknotrvledeed that he 9)(1k-titled and etterited the forssoing , vet forth ttosirein,are stitl a lurid Of iii i,Section 1,2,and 3 of the By-Laws of said company,kind the Resolution, .�xtrk�n�rae++t s�sftirced the seal of said car' rettbara d that e1rt ie t r o,ar ,• ,, ,�„ M'' Cab in E>Itpiretb ti ",t, / ,....,.°. .✓�i�ll m19 86 . tl o:4/,:# Neat 7''•ioblit in Bind far State of 'I aSlz .tle C�1l Ilesidline at ,Assistant Secretary Of. I, ' .. Jt��s E. Heath - PLANET iPISURANC.E COMPANY,da hire'by certify that the • : 11 a trite and ct�ract copy p altep lted by said PLANET INSURANCE COMPANY,which is still,in full 4rce woke end iorapntno u j a Powwr of Attornkiy p IN'WiTNE$S WHEREOF;I!►tire herieurnto art rrri{sand grid affiired the noel of tsid Company this 11th Dec=' •et iI flt41y of 'It .l ;,,,... �� , near • • i � Aeii.asrtt�iwe:racaiy . . „ ... I • E�-1431 1192 "� • � i aF'-"'• .s..:i�.,., ,:.eh,.� .,N:t,.9.h7f.«1aa,:..�.�.hu�.... .�._..».W.».�«.��»N.t,eti.n «.F,�w6a w.:.;.`..�d`I,,�,'�..4.,-�r .,7+.,. ,1,..,..mM,P..tM,FSP?cv>±aw,S�C!•FU.rrantcwwn.n.�. .,r..A..�..f. •ti i Sr:- t (,,"�" if 1 BARGHAUS1C0NsULTING ENGINEERSJNC. "Land Planning, Survey, and Design Specialists" „ Mr. Keith' S. Liden Sr. Planner City of Tigard , Community Development Dept. 12420 S.W. Main P.O. Box 23397 ij Tigard, OR 97223 I} November 7, 1986 I Dear Mr. Liden, ,, Please be advised that we no longer have an office at 9798 S.W. i • b Barbur Blvd. #304, Portland, OR Please send all correspondence to Barghausen Consulting Engineers 6625 South 190th, Suite 102, Kent, WA 98032 f' i 3"harlk You * Kathy Sparhawk-Lathy kf ' r 9498 8,W, gerbur livd,,#304 • portiand,Oregon 97219 • (003) 246-7157 Home Office; 6625 South 190th,#102 * Kent, 98082 • (206)872-6622 k { • I I • w.. r 3 �> • cr' Motion by Councilor 9r an, seconded by Couhci1or Johnson to'approvo. t � ,r Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. , y 1586 �• 7.2 Approve Council Minutes - May Sy aY Correction on Page 4; Et-fp ahould read "Motion approved by a 4-1 I. • '�� ty YYr i , Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Eadon to appro p ve as -� b Motion by r corrected.i, Approved by unanimous vote of Coutici l preseht Y ; 7.3 Civic Center Smoking Policy f a. City Administrator distributed maps delineating area designations. ;. y The assign d designations were the results 'of office surveys. , b. Discussion ensued on the consistency of the policy with particular . ,�. 'ohcerh to smoking in the private offices and the forward public , n fti office area �nt i ea of the Police �ppartrr� y offices of x �� approval of an amended policy which would,'y c. Councilor Soki�t moved Public office and private of •. p 'ohibi.t sm g p R the Police Department. Councilor Johnson seconded the motion: r *j d. trot i oh approved by unanimous vote of Council present , ' 7,4 Approve Employee Recognition { _,, aN RESOLUTION NOr 8E 58 A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING CITY STAFF FOR Pt „, :. .�CONTRIBUTIONS TO CIVIC CENTER COMPLETION, .• '5 f ^j b Count i or 7, 1,, get or d ed by Count i l or' Sr i an t o a �: ���� `� pprov�: d b. oti0h y 114r.:::. . Approved by uhahimoua Vote of Couhci? pre. sen 1 ya3'' J, ,wt t' 7.5 irst Interstate Final Order SDR 6-85 ti 5-86 I fx4rt 1r. 1'. ,44 1 r*` CarAmuhit Development birector requested amehdit1i Sectioh 7 2) to , t \ y that direct vehicUlar' ingress as ,''', read 'T e city Cactncl cohtlude5 x ' ' a: nowt oh the plan submitted . . • "w A FINAL ODDER . , . �,„• 2 � THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION or RRaVAI or �A SITE ,�lr,�;,,.,:` RESOLUTION SN NO• S� �9 IN THP A PLANNING k�iRBCTt�R E Ap UPON CITY EVIEW REt VEST REVIEW( R -86) AND A VARIANCE REQUEST (V 5-SG) '' ''; ADOPTING F I Nb I Nab AND CoNCLU5 I ONS OF 'LAW r'n., 4 K c N Motion b y Councilor fr i an p seconded by Councilor Johnson to app ova f k41, as amended t Yt' 7, s r t 1 "F'P ' t r dY ;a h r i ,, '. . COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 120 t eE ^ 4 ,KKttF I . • I e da Councilor Brian &Apha*ized that the City Coun'l1 expressed strong concern about traffic impact, and he still; has reservation about the _ ' volume of traffic, however, given the State laws and City Codes governing zoning, the 'development could not be restricted. vote of Council resent, Mayor -Q- majority I P 3 i ' - . . , Motion approved by a r eln • Cook abstaining. , ' .'. 7.6 Hall/Burnham LID ordinance Amendment Phase III ` a. Community Development Director indicated th at the costs for the im p rovements are estimates at this t i me. ORDINANCE No. 86-29 AN ORDINANCE of THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AMENDING ORDINANCE_.NO. .85-47 (HALL/BURNHAM LID-PHASE III) ' c Motion by Councilor Drian, seconded by Councilor Eadon to approve. Approved by uhanimous vote of Council present 7.7'I' Landmark Ford `Final Order `;SCE 2-86 , � a. Community Development Director reviewed the findings of the City 1,,';',/ 4 ' council. ilk. *,; b. Discussion ensued on the conclusions cont, ined in the resolution. It 1, appeared No. 3 and No. 5 were 'contradi y. recommended b,; ► c�or It was recor�mended t Tat x+ ; No. 3 be deleted and a 9D day time limit be placed on No. . removal of the used car sigh. N NO. 88 6D I N THE MATTER OF uT I o THE ADOPTION �F A I FINAL ORDER ,, c. RESOLUTION -� UPON CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL q. . or A SIGN CODE EXCEPTION (SCE 2-86) t o P n by Councils do ton of vh� Ordinance or g d. Motion r �'ohnson to approver deleting No. 3 and adding 4 ++ s o f' a Upon .. � �,�� No. the words w�th�n 90 dayl p 4," installation of new sign, whichever comes first. " Nos. 4 and 5 would ;, ',� become No 3 and 4. Councilor Brian seconded Ithe motion. Motion approved by a -O-i majority vote of Council) present, Mayor T J cook *bst ±,ining 1 t,,EES: 7g47 p.m. R�l • 17 :R r•,ONVENEr 81100 p.th. •° e, UT I L I T I E5 AND RANCH 18E COMM i TTEE WORK3HOR • • in They ! in the rec clih Plan, T y ° k, o The �or��m�ttee ekpla�ned th��r ir�v�l�en7e�� � the fw�nc�isee� �a�d came �c had reviewed the franchise agreements w a the conclusion that a rate increase was in ' order. ,.The recycling rD ; will l be 5 F program � submitted to Metro through the County. u�. I ,a Page l 4 W COUNCIL MINUTES -1 MAY 120 198E ° I I t I Jid� ,.wJ.. ..N1.�ApV+. .-•:'v'.{.w,-1....>...., Ni..1r.- �.a.ti d .u,'4:I..e._....�.�r... /:^.tt ..:..7 f«i..,.aw�M+.s..�r.w.a.l.NVn r-� ., r �d.wd+. ' { • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON # ` COUNCIL AG NDJ ITEM SUtIMARY � AGENDA Of= may 12, 1986. AGENDA ITEM #; c� DATE 'SUBMITTED: May ; 12, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: City `Cour► ',he .' ISSUE/AGENDA, TITLE: First Eq§lic hearing on Nthis item on, 4/28/86 Intear`s %0" 7;i r 1r `,,V=S'x86 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Ann Newton REQUES1"E0 BY: Cam. CoUno i DEPARTMENT HAD OK: ' , CITY A0/0 ADMINISTRATOR; _»...-....w.»._NH.x. .,N«.N«.»» • .+....»»»x....._w_.»»..' .NxH4i.{..».�..�..�Nr....wwx...r_xr»».wN._•.1».x.»HNM..H_»�»...,..»......—,.`.Ilr....x... rw»»»._._..._...,»:..: ' '• »»_H.�..r»...NN»HN.r._N:.M»..xxN».xN»:..f...:..x.....xH»»:1> »»H^,. ..x.x;N».:.:..»..Nxw»»»_»»..»_M...x»..x...M ..»..x_..N.•w_»x.».wxH.Mx.»x .wM».w Mxx x. POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council adopt the attached resolution adopting findings and • conclusions to uphold the Planning (Director's approval of a Site Design Review . a • and variance'request with conditions -iHrMrMxxrw.�rw•�•f�._xr IxNlrx+rrHrr{�1�N�rw ...Nri.w{r{MNWN NN{rr11HN»»».xrxrrrw.»uxNrwN.rwi»»w!I,wNrl»�rl{N�H,.. ,.,��Ix.wl^1w��M i�•rrrlrrrrr.M.�" N»NlxNrlr.rww»Nrl�xl :wN.Nw».r.w»r ^ ;N,». ..., _x.Mw_».._ x.�.:.Nw.»_»»_.r_HNMx».xN.w.»•..._^......_..» », xxx... ._».. ._x_N�. »H•HNNx»x. Nw. � I INFO RMATION SUMMARY On April 28, H Council held la public hearing to review the �.�8b, the City Council • Design Review and Variance' request for ' a Site gesa. Planning Director's approval of property located at the northwest corner of Pacific Highway and Greenburg • l to uphold the Directors' approval with Road. The Council voted ur7amirtr.�WS y p modifications to the required condition , A resolution is. attached for • Council review and adoption 1 � lNrr hlrN,rwWw•H»NN:»� NM�.H�• !f »Mr^ININN••r• NH•1•!+•H•xN•w• w N ^•'MII 4�iw{{ri•.wH4.1�•+r•i'i�NZw•NN�1�»N�'x'r•i»H.lrerNl.H 11 MH » i.w 1 NNNiM. 11r Hi1HHwuN»NNwx.Mw•»Nl.p'�uNMrNtI•�_»NNNIfNH.HN{f_ f.w•rwWi•Nxx»MNN•1»!MN Mrll. »...l+HMH N•.ifµ.»MlwwrNN.N•.rwNN.N•�+ww.xHNNM.»w.l•r••wwr»r»» ,. MirM Al»I RnlATIVE 00N.lID :RH U 1,,r � � , Approve, the attached resolution solut r Y which upholds o�dy the Planning nr � n g Director' s approval with uadi f,a ;aL iar3 to required cond it ions, r 2, Modify the attached Ed r a so 1 u t ion � 4HNIH•NMw^•NH'N ir111N1!1 rMNI IN 11 11 Y 1 •!i 1 µ »IwIN11 1 1N1 lawl�rMl�11 � W+ f 1 11 { N 1.Y1 i {H f fl »Ni,• 14 f 11 H4lw. �� Mx11NIHMNNHNNMI lNINHrwwN+r.r NHI• lr.rf{•»NI.N4rNww i•w fl f.l r IINWIN: 11� ! 11rr»+MwlNrn N.NNHIH»NNxH•.NNN111N1 INM••wNN._r'NNNNNr:.Nw Mlw•r»NiNNiM{rMMH xN.Mf+{wN»wNHUfINNrrMI•r1•Illr _ - ' gU001: I"I»wD ACTION r � �;{µjf x+•Nr••H»NNw..!»••r11HNlN..rn.r•✓•N• {rrrr. +w •� Approve LHeuttacied resrituaar which upholds the hiar7� yr� �� approval r �t�r � with modifications to required conditions, hs7` , f;."��f�l: I I » II .,R • fi r • :w.r,+w.+.la-..-va..a..+..uv.ur.rU:A..va..:...+.Jrrn..�v F+:LV , f4f CITY OF TICA.RD, .OREGON RESOLUTION 'No. 86"- THE MA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF A IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A FINAL ORDER UPON CI PLANNING 'DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL'OF A SITE DESIGN REVIEW REQUEST (SDR 6-86) AND A VARIANCE REQUEST (V 5-86)` ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. WHEREAS, - this matter came before the City Council at its meeting of April 28, 1986 upon the request of Council for review of the Planning Director's approval of the application request; and WHEREAS, the City ° Council had before it the Director' s approval and documentation provided by the applicant as part of the application; and • •, WHEREAS, the aPPl:icable criteria in this decision are the following Chapter 18,108 of the Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18,62 of the Tigard Municipal Code • Chapter 18.102 of the Tigard Municipal Code • Chapter 18,100 of the Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18,134 of the Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18, 114 of t he Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18,164 of the Tigard Municipal Code 1 • WHEREAS, based on the record in this case the � ��. . � r record � this City Council makes the following � ' findings s 'of fact: g NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by, the Tigard City Council that: Section it The subject site is located on the northwest rorner of Pacific '~ eerllaur`g Road (WCT'M 281 2AA Lots 1,000, 1001, and • Highway and Lr�. 1100) within the Corporate limits of Tigard, Oregon, Section 2..: The subject property consists of three tax lots which contain a , commercial arld a single family residence, rra'�,sal • Section 3 ' The property is maned C—i (Commercial General.) , I se,ztiori 4; The applicant requested site design review approval to develop a 6,800 so, Ft', retail/auto service bui.ldin1 and an automatic oar ' wash,' In addition, the applicant: requested to variance for deletion of a portion of public sidewalk ai.oni OW Center Street : , and to allow a land s ca e 'area o F 1`8 ,5% where 15% is required, P I Section 18, 120,0z0 requires Site Ceuelop lnt Review approval for s all new developments • Section t,: Section 18462,050 ( ) requires a minimum of 15% landscaping in the • . }, '1 ' (1.•(3) ,one .4 OI. �.)I`!U t r Pace 1 • I I , ..r .... r._ ...4..l.lr..... ,.,,:A+,..,rLr.-..'.-r— wLL.3n. a-•..ar..a...7f,..w,. «...-G.a.,...».,.LCrY..i..-.,...!J...[nn.J,-.,.i..,... .a4w,...+naYrNW.Nk%M%,-k;sf,-,.. ; al ( ( fr Section 7: Section 18,164. 070 r requires sidewalks on both sides of arterial requires and collector streets to be built at the time of construction. The City Council also makes the following conclusions of law: (1) The City Council concludes that the applicants proposal conforms to the applicable criteria contained in the Tigard Municipal Code. c '' 0 "+r., Orr.-�1, ,• , (2) T City Council concludes that direct vehicular k c\ '' e ingress .:.„.: ...... at Jreenbu� Rod shall be permitted and that ' Condition #12 contained in the Planning Director's approval shall `it be remove language deleted is as follows; (Direct removed. The lan ua�e tca be del 4 vehicular ingt ess-rte at Greenberg Road shoi,l not be permitted.) tfitf ,91i (3) The City Council concludes that a non-r~emr�nstrance at reeri►ent for •the si,dewall< con Center Street shah. be r"equi.red The language to be added as a coed iUon is underlined as follows • non-remori •trance a.reement for the sidewalk on SW Center Street ii --t, of the subject site shall be signed, ; no ar~i, zeci and filed with the Ci. Recor•de 19r a )ar*oval, ,,;the Ci Attorney The he Cily Council, thereFcar-e, orders that the above refer en ced de•ter~miratior • be, and same hereby is approved. The Council further orders that the City Recorder send a, copy of the final order as a notice of 'final decision in this matter. ,, • P..rSSE;:): This day of ~..•,.... ., 1986. f1 " day r , John E. Cook, Mayor - City of Tigard • • Doreen R. Wilsrin, Ci•i y kec order, ,:w; Ci•t: y o•f'•r'7"igard (br/4) � r { Iv i*S0L.l,J`I"'101\N IVO, 86, .r..,,.,R " .,r. ,rn n r.•,.r.r..,r.r •r..... .;1 ,,rr •' ..,.,t„. -..•,....... n... . ,. + M fA... , p " ,1 •• ..... ,.-„+. ._ .,. 1.. ..»i» «., ...,+.hr--.M -...,.A.....»r...•...k w..�a.... ,m...,..,.a ..s..w...lr..aw....,.. .� -.a.a,r. wi, jI` • • c •, 9. SITE DESIGN RE • VIEW SDR 6-86 VARIANCE V 5-86 FIRST INTERSTATE TRUST - NPO ' #2 A request by the City Council to review the Community Development Director's decision to approve with conditions a request to develop a 6800 square foot retail/auto service building And ash automotive car wash and a Variance to ”. delete a portion of public sidewalk along Center Street an d to allow a z, property . landscaped area of 13.5','. where 15% is required. The p p y i s zoned C-G (Commercial General) and i% located at the northwest corner of Pacific Highway and Greenburg Road (WCT M 281 2AA lots 1000, 104i, and 1100). a. Public Hearing Opened. ° b. Senior Planner Keith Liden synopsized staff report noting ,. modifications to meet staff's conditions. The original Planning Director's decision restricted access onto Greenburg; however, the engineering staff has revised the plan to include a right turn only '• r onto Greenburg Road. c. Ed Sullivan' 53 SW Yamhill, Portland,and, questioned the validity dity of the y to h�v� thr ice m pu led from the consent d. Legal Counsel reviewed the procedural• reviewed p issues regarding the Council 's interpretation of resolution, motion, acid filing. sus co use of the Council that the hearing proceed. ,�` ,, e. It was consensus f. Public Testimony: , Proponents o Ed Sullivan 53 SW Yamh i l l , Portland representing the reviewed the site plan. He discussed the traffic pp p ewe a � i+>aht r�vx circulation on Greeriburg Road, Pacific Highway, and within the development. Gary Katsion traffic engineer, Wilsey F ht 521 1 S W 1 1L h r Portl anon discussed in detail the two major concerns: trip generation and operation: at the intersections acid driveways. The site plan has H •/ been developed closely with staff and ODOT. 1. " 2 SW Yamhill Portic�od, 5�� W Wrightson Prc, erties t o � Tom Wrightson, r i g�� n p , spoke in favor of the proposal 0 Thr mas Sullivan r_ a ttorn e5 t l. i �. 8 W , Tigard!d , had r 1° concern about traffic that s i:r,rl1, •rtlkw' rf,Cw � ri�' 'r' ff but r s met. now satis�i�c, � ,a � o ' Tom Sar•ghauser ,` civil engineer , Sarghauser Consulting Enclirleet , I • lnc answered questions regarding the guardrail - �'�,eA�.,�l Y4 F'y. 31 .N�t wt•tl+w ,r'_ ,L x r • • , „a. ,..,. .,. .,...:. ..a..',»....- .:_.....».......r:.:rte n ...:.,la,_ x1:.3..-....8•..,.w♦.:JL.Y,r L-..J..:..._+-+W.fa i.,u,as_ .w.,. .,a,, w+.A....t.... , M , ., 4a5['I A 1 /' ' p. City Administrator requested clarification of the Director. 'ia decision regarding specific items which have been revised since the Director's approval. •, h. .Discussion followed on various traffic situations and options for :' ° ' handling such problems. °" • is Ed £uilivan withdrew his objection of the Council's Jurisdiction to • reopen the public hearing: . is • Public Hearing Closed. '•' • k. Motion o n by Cou Ycxl Edwa rds, seconded b y Counr.�l President .r i an to • . approve proposal striking Planning Di rector's ; Condition 12 and ' allowing the ingress as shown on the drawing; adding Condition 22 requiring a non-remonsrance agreement for the sidewalk on Center • . Street and filed with the record for approval by City Attorney. • 1 • Motion 6pproved by unanimous vote of Council Present', • 10. URBAN AREA PLANNING AGREEMENT . V a. Community Z z Development Director distributed a portion of the agre•�nlent by Council at the May 5� ti The entire agreement will be reviewed b the Coun 1986 meeting 11. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone 'may request that an item be r emoved discussion and separate action. Motion to: • by motion on for d 1 sc 11. 1 Approve Council Minutes - April ' 11.2 Receive and File. a Community Development Land Use Decisions 1 , b Monthly Departmental Reports March, ', 1986 1 11.3 Award Did -- Hall Blvd/Burnham LID #85-01 - $103,713.O0 - Bill Page Const. t. • ' 11.4 I Approve Revenue u e Manu�l & �ee5 1 Charges Resolution No. 86-52 52 1l:5 Approve Computer Purchases Auth orize Contract Signatures 11.E A pprove OLCCLicense Application - New Outlet Summit R e�ta� + ant , 12180 SW Sch_l i s Ferry Road, Tigard, R App i i cat i o 11.7 Ap p rove Conditional Acceptance e Beaver Bolt Street & Se er i m r'•ie�' 't'. Resolution No. 85-51 � a. City Administrator presented revisions to 10. 4„ b. City Administrator requested 10..'r be amended to include an .A,,a, d w,, 1 ,,, the bid and to app, I"Iipr i v,i't •,,uth, w<i at w+•II'! ,f."0 the f ,'1,0r":' , k'Ri r C ,c i t A d i �xs tr atc added the f l 1 wi 1° items, 10.5 TAG/Court Yard Paving g 10.9 Medical C,„oviAt aoe 1-'hi e f 1. t.,I•it I f a a�a . \ ` MEMORANDUM 'Z'0. TIGA.R;D CITY CCJ'LTNCI I I FROM: GRAMORE, 6-86 AND '�-86 STJE+TECT. CDR 6 ,�' motion at 1 Review b m The above matters were called up for Coun..:� by the Council's March 24, 1986 meeting The Council has the L ' and there Were` indications of individual Director's action ' d;l.cat Council members as to concerns they had. It is the purpose of this memorandum to set forth the Concerns we have heard expressed sed and our response to those matters. We concur with the staff's cone*._ �►i is basically an that the '° • proposed development `cal,l.y consistent went �: devel o with the relevant standards and criteria contained in the co'iTumunity Development Code. "° We believe ieve the City staff did an excellent -' the excellent job working with th applicant and other public e approval be affirmed by Council. agencies and request that th pp ti The Use Issue one of the matters which is not, at issue concerns the uses permitted on the site.ite Such uses are permitted by the zoning , ordinance and may be made of the property Until the zoning I' ordinance is changed. At one point in the approval stage,) a convenience store was discussed with staff The applicant has no intention of placing s s i I f such a ever considered such a store ot� this situ. store wex'e CIT'Y CouN CIL 1 • , I _ - .. .....-:� .,. ... .. ..,:.:,..»,.a.....' 4. .......:....w...a..u....Al;...«-...+,nl..i..-. n .....:.1. i.,.......+,.Y.:l,r.. .,.+i....:...+.+.41_..0 wii.r._.:c.+Ar. u..+..M-:.:.s. • it would probably require remodeling and, in the. fut�ura, p Y � there fore a new site dev .,..,:opment review w approval. Traff c Saf et' The applicant has been workin g with' the City Planning and transportation staffs taffs and the staff of the Oregon Department of R p r � Transportation (ODOT) for the last several months to provide the safest and most efficient access to this irregularly shaped sSite, ' f in Y iew of the fact that the proposed uses wer e not . . generating ing` J t. new traffic trips, but were trips "dropping in" from the existing traffic streams near the site. At �-he, request of ©DOT, the applicant prepared a Traffic impact. Study, Which formed the basis of several additional requirements, including `the g ri ht turn lane i g, ye single curb cut along g Pacific Highway and t� Greenburg and Para. at Gr � . Pacific Highway. The staff originally ha d some concerns o ver the r Greenburq Road curb cut from site design (i.e there would be no limitation on turning movements from and to the Site) and ) traffic (absence of a traffic impact study) perspectives. The applitant secured a traffic Study and agreed to limit traffic movement s at the qteenbur.g Rd. curb cut and provide the right turn island at pacific Highway and the staff then agreed to the curb cut on Greenb .rg , • 1 i s to a driveway along Center The a�pla.cant has limited site access t driveway along caTY COUNCIL 2 ... a. , l ..........,.v......,. .1....... ry , emn ,. ..... .......... 1 .... .vn .r....t ... ...t f... ,i Y. I,1...i... ..y I \ nP r , Star one curb cut on Pacific Highway and one curb cut along Groenrurg Rd. The configuration of the access patterns was o . dictated by the "stacking" limitations of the surrounding intersections and traffic safety considerations.' For exar ap1e, • the intersection of Center and Greenberg does not allow for many • ' for access into the site. Further, the cars'. to be waiting ' traffic on Greenburg does not allow for an exit from the site. Finally,o ODOT recommended that there be a "right turn only" exit • �'' on Pacific so that all traffic exiting goes south. �.f tc-Highway� The applicant and public agency staff worked together to plan the a '- p for . Points • on-site in view of the limited `access, oinzs� so as to Provide � "stacking" in excess of City adequate parking and on site stacking • requirements See Tigard Comm. Dev. Code sec. 15.306. 060 The traffic professionals from the City and ODOT agree that the safety and access of the. site is safe and convenient for the w permitted uses applicant and staff agreed Further; the app to rearrange the site so as not t structures and uses on the s ' not preclude �,the o recl� Comma rdial St': exit proposed for Pacific Highway'' Fro c,-'�ed Structures c t ureS r r for The applicant has submitted its plans for stri.iotures proposed f The proposed structures are a ' _ the site and p val . reCe x.v ed a pro '. .Y 4 vast ix p ii oveinent over t .e present 'uses and of bush` quality' that T,IGARD CITY CC • • . Tigard residents will be pleased with the site. The Variances The Director granted two variances in granting approval-- the h„ . deletion of the sidewalk on Center St. and the lowering of the landscaping requirement of 15% The Director's decision was supported by findings which are, in turn, consistent with the applicant's justification at pp. 3-4 of the letter accompanying the application. The sidewalk variance was granted because the property to the west is unlikely to be developed pedestrian use, p ed for p currently being part of the Pacific Highway embankment, in the area of the proposed retaining wall and in the area proposed to be used for w 1 . to Commercial St. A sidewalk at that Point is an exit ramp � � p p expensive and of little use ,uo edest p rians. d Further its . , presence would encourage mid-block crossings of Center St. There are no sidewalks on Center St. at present and future sidewalks Would be better placed on the North side of Center, where there , ' are existing residences and businesses. in variande is now considerably less t Z'he' .an dscap Y i than the 1. .1 . C 637: , q r ft. ) deviation re e;�ted c ��g�nalY ly, as the a pl ica. nt and staff agreed that additional landscaping Was `advisable around the retaining g wall, SO as to lessen the possibility of unsightly c of f it;L. In addition, the applicant has agreed to ma tit .n r' J.IGA D CITY c o 1CII - e, L , • I n I J • ,' .. ,., a .. .. ....L".-r.- .+(.. n •n..,t r.fXwtwW.. wy.0 wu«i..+r'Wr.NMr...wasa.w... _ ...1.. a• landscaping in the public right-of-way of Pacific Highway in an ,• amount of 4300 sq. ft. , which is not "counted" in the landscaping re airements.._ The reason for the , q' �e wa�iance revolves. around the {>; •.,, " amount of landscaping provided the rest of the site, due to its irregular shape, lengthy frontage, and the extensive dedication and improvement requirements (i.e. right turn island at Greenburg and Pacific Highway, the dedication and improvement requirements �- on Greenburg and elsewhere and the limiting of site access. ) 1' Canclus,ion The app 1.7.cant requests that Cou oil affirm th e decision of the , Planning , g Dire ctor in this matter. I ;> = I i • I. • • I , Qi I r i• 11 I , r _ I I , I .. I .. ��RD I C � CJUNCI 5 1f x 1 I 9 A • n A �� q. '. I . ...., :..._ .«:..,..�>*.u4...:..-.__wP-R f..f....JU.....W♦.,.:..»......:...iA.............«., .......::.'..,.,.Yn......x4'.:.:xJ.•}..n 1«:ra _ .. ..t...w1pn«u...va•4.;....'uw1.1.-.. ,+.4M1,',..-,.., a.:.:r;....F...,.J.:.. r w W SOUTHVVEST OFFICE �� SUPPLY 5 V1l z . 1 3 12245 S.W, Main Street Portland,Orsgon,97223 Ph:639-3179 � April 23, 1986 �' r. P Mr. Tom �'; , I I Tovin Co. \ • , 8858 S.W. Center Ct. I Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Toms I , It has come to our attention that there are some concerns .. c on the art of the i n automotive care center that istobe built at the corner of Y l regarding the proposed Greenburg and Pacific highway. It is mY understanding that staff has approved recommended approval of the Project and that the area is zoned for such a business. ' Having seen the site plan and noting the considerable improvements that would. occur (particularly to Greenburg Rd. ) the members of the Ti Development r _ • Committee feel , Tigard ispprojecttewould be in�o der for the g Economic t,hat a positive vote on this a. P t of that section m rovemen of Tigard. 'it should be noted that Dennis Thompson's ni p ' ility on Main s fac " always kept neat and clean and I am sure this street is alwa s }�e t tae this facility would maintained in the same manner. A read. • old' be maa.na improvement over what is currently occupying the site. Further, there would be a number' of jobs created that will generate added revenues for surrounding merchants. The city Y, business j tax from such a stable may even be able to collect the • business. I As far as I can see this is a win-win wa n s ituatioi for .A11 of .; the Tigard community. It is our . belief that this is just the he type development nt We need and th at the council s ho uld be looking for ways to investment encourage rather than discourage this type of nvestment in ti Tigard° s future } s54.1cerely, I ' %. ..,„,..,.. ,--ii (1-' ,.,..., ,,,,,,,--- ,›I‘r.„ei'ri...-'6.6'f sl ohn C, savory a Chairman I . , 4 Tigard tconomi Development Committee cc. Mayor John Cork i• Councilman Jerry 8dwar'd:s • Councilwoman Valerie ,Johnson Councilwoman Carolyn Radon �I MY' s Den,h i�,S Thompson 4 Mr oC 'I' ri u�.�.x� n I ; / O • • r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON LOUNCIAGENDA ITS SUMMARY AGENDA OF: , w �.1 AGENDA ITEM # DATE SUBMITTED: 4/24/86 PREVIOUS ACTION: PLannia ector„ . w SDR 6-86/ App ISSUE/AGENDA 3/14/86 ENOA TITLE: ..�..., w -- -• ..� --• t Trust D BY: Keith hiders ' V 5 f3fi First Interstate PREPARED REQUESTED BY: _ , DEPARTMENT HEAD Ok: 0 CITY ADMINISTRATOR. POLICY ISSUE Should the Director's decision for a highway oriented use at the corner of Greenburg Road and Pacific Highway be affirmed by the City Council. (; • INFORMATION SUMMARY On March 14 , 1986 the Pl;;�nninQ 'Director. approved an application for a Commercial. � f .ti PP p� I' Center On the corner of Greenburg Road and Pacific Highway subject to conditions. • this item up for review and re-affirmer'. its t On March 24 , I called ha. p 1986, the Council A !hearing is scheduled for April 28, 1986. Attached ,� + •'a ..' ��14, 1986. r � i is position on Apr�.l 1�► are co i .s of the irector's Decision, the applicant's original narrative a traffic p study by Wilsey and Ham, a revised set of plans which are intended to address the - approval noted Director's g f: a prior condition; of app �d iri the Ui.rectar s Derision and a memo re, ardin 6 ., `o pert CU 4-�82 for Jim Settlemi.re. -4104,,,, . approval ,.tr the property,Y� 1 • • I I ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1 . Uphold the Director' s Decision incorporating the conditions imposed by the staff. ll 2. Approve the request with modifications to the ex7nditiuns. I .I iti Deny the request by overturning the Director' Decision l . ..i.,is ......., :Y+w•r� __-----tiiw SUGGESTED ACTION 1 � � � �" t i? r 1t1S'i t��l" And h N• ''I �V • t 1 1'�•xr' ' r `° 1 1 � `Y �1�7 Gj1 K�17 o a l 4. {tic�±il•a:� the- 1���a�t.�tt��iar i11i �11.11� �i u�w1t�`�1et 1�1��. � ire°•t t.1ppt"41vY l 1 4 • • • , ....r . .w�ww-L,nY-�wV.11.:. ww,+G�n -+•lli . {t..w' .. w. H«%w:YN4-tn. •xx x•4 A" • mt tiol (1Nl)tUM ■ I (:try ()F" T I t;A l), Olt.(;()N 11 <a' TO: April 9, I3 9 ' �, C�.�.y Council �i �K ]• • FROM: Leith l_iden, senior Planner +� yr 11-.82 `.i e l c i.r e t Jim settl rn As noted on the staff t.rcport, Conditional Use approval was granted to al.l.ow �( y . • flower shop on the subject property, The cor'ditions of approval where • finalized in( 12esrlutirjn No 82-28 which imposed the following conditions: . .. 1 All curb cuts onto Pacific HI i hwa y conf orm to City ty of Tigard street improvement star(dards p standard curb shall be constructed to align with the existing curb along Pacific Highway , 3 , C,1,stru{::tirJf plans for the curb improvements shall. he .submitted to t approved by the City of '1"i:gard Engineering Division, Site plans be the curb improvements plans drainage Lana shall bc_ �ubtnitt.ed with t 9 1, adequate drainage,• to insure a,dt. uat� on�s�.'ce 4 The parking spaces in front of the existing building shall. be h p 9 p restriped to indicate head-4n parking g rather than angle parking, 5. Potholes in the existing parking area shall be patched with asphalt. 1 • ', 1 a; r 4 1(.)F d (t ) � • I I i II If 1 I fCidc • / 5 . „+». u .....�. .,.U, _.. ..d 1c..a.i. »«+»... ....n..-.. r1 ...._.«.J-u.,t;.w. .- .4.,..Hr-ar.F.,.--x.....,.iw..x......,+i{,.,.e.A+.,-:::...t.i.{....,ke,:..tiu. ,• _..i.. ' 4 ( •, CrTY or TxcARD NOVICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 6-86 VARIANCE V 5-86 i, APPLICATION: Request by First Interstate Trust to develop a 6800 sq. ft. ` retail/auto service building and an automatic car wash,. ,A Variance is also requested for deletion of a portion of public sidewalk along enter Street and to allow a landscaped area of 13 ,5% where 15% is required. The property is zoned C—G (Commercial General) and is located at the Northwest corner of Pacific Highway and Greenburca Road (WCT'1 2S1 2AA lots 10000 1001. and 1100). '�-4 DECISI.ON: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described applications subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his .. decision are as noted below, A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background pro 'e r t . or , . �` The City has reviewed several land use applications f p p y ,. the most recent being a Conditional Use (CU 4-82) to approve a flower ' shop L 2, Vicinit y Information The property is surrounded by Pacific High lay, Greenburg Road, and ' Highway i s . 4 Center Street. The zoning on the south side of Pacific (Central District) , The properties east of Greenburg Com i . ” General)Road aretr•�onedt.tsCnGes� Dli�erci.al 'General and the parcels north of �,, • Center Street are zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) , 3 . Site Information and Pro osal Description " . P The subject property consists of three tat{ lots which contain a . commercial building trS a single family residence,ce, Driveway C presently y ava1fable from Pacific Highway, Road and Center Street, 1 j The appl',tcant proposes to remove the existing building and construct a car wash in the western portion of the property and a retail/automotive service building near Greenburg Road. One driveway entrance is intended for each of the three streets abutting the property The property will be filled to more closely resemble the grade of Pacific Highway This will require a retaining wall which ° is gas ' high as 10 feet near the western end of the parcel A 70 root ,`. high 100 square fuor sign has also been presented for 'approval amount n t o f' V, requested to reduce. th��. required� i �r�ar►ce3 are. also ' , landscaped area from 15% to apProxi,tnatel.y 13 ,5% And to 011°w the deletion of a `:sidnwe11.; along most or the Center Street frontage 01prc:1(")P w rYrr�ItIt∎i ,I.,1, 'F, t;,, 1, I, $1) r'> r1r. 1 '. 't ''' . "" ' .' t ' , . ,,t. ' \ ' a • I I . 1 ,. .. _... .fit, .,.. _.,a:. . .....t,...,,. ..,.,t...�c..,.rc'...+.,.,....... ...M...w. ....k.,.x..1,, ,.,aaa.....:Y-.c,�.....>w�-»..,,....,w.. ` .. :.::.n. li f dl, • • • . 4 , Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. A sanitary sewer connection permit for any new additions , • b., All work performed within the Pacific; Higkway right-of-way will require a permit from the State Highway Division. c. Visual clearance must intersections• at a.ntersec�.�a,n.t and • be maintained driveways, d. Wheelchair ramp s must be installed at all corners and on the • • proposed traffic signal island, e, A tt��affic control pavement marking plan must be submitted for City S pp prior to installation by the applicant, Cit and State approval, f, The proposed driveway on Greenberg ' Road should not be installed , because of the existing congestion at the Pacific Highway intersection, the difficulty in prohibiting left turn attempts onto the property, and the City policy which calls for minimizing the number points on arterial and collector minimizing umber of access o�.nts o streets , g. The storm drain catch basin an line proposed to be installed at the intersection of Greenburg Road and Center street needs to be rerouted to '`avoid crossing private property , It is suggested that the catchbasin be connected directly to the manhole at the intersection h. The guardrail clan g P acific Highway shall be relocated not removed. . I The Proposed retainin :wall' near Center Street is a potential . eyesore, par,ticue,arly if",it becomes a target for graffiti, Care provide which will act to rov�.de iandsca in g w h , should be taken to :landscaping minimize the problem No objection to the variance requests The nu' t l d jn g i nsp' ection Division and Tigard Water District have no objection 'to the request. Inc state Highway Division states that a traffic impact' report is necessary to evaluate the impact of access alternatives A toad Approach Permit i s required and the necessary " t r eel impr°ovemori1<, ch,41, t be doter°mtnod 4,4Vter the report is completrid - Ijt"�E' note's that ,several utility poles wi l i need to be moved ?; No r 9t 1 r r 11 41s rt 4 a, boom received, • r dr'� b t,. i�l 1 'firir,' 11.4it; . A I a, ' .. a,•,... ...r-._.•......+ .'.Gil...+ N.x..... r .1...r.xN n>. +d,.i. r.,x u}F • ,, • W fig , ©, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION i al 1 consistent with the '.s bas e» u�.lame nt i y The proposed commercial de p relevant standards and criteria contained in the Community Development . Code. However, several aspects of the proposal including the variance requesb warrant further discussion. . 1 Access The Greenberg Road driveway is not appropriate for the reasons noted by the Engineering Oivi3ion. 1 This driveway l should be removed and it i3 ., recommended that a pedestrian link betirueen the public sidewalk and the project be provided in its place, I< , . 2, Visual Clearance d that t objects taller than three feet in Code :,re ua,re J 8 02 of the C q . Chapter 1, . 1 cannot be t' and driuewa s, This height Cann within 30 feet of intersections a y portion of the Code is particularly important near busy intersections. It is recommended that the two Red maples that are shown closest to the Pacific Highway and Center Stree t driveways s be eliminated, I Also, the . ' mature height of all other landscaping material should not exceed three feet. 3 , Landscapirtg generally conforms with Code requirements • , The proposed landscaping plan g y .,, I with the e�tcetxon of visual clearance above) , lot coverage wi p '�h ce :(discussed above.. (noted below under the variance review), street trees, and the treatment of the proposed retaining wall, I The Center Street frontage does not include street trees as required by the Code, presumably because of the proposed retaining;`wall, The deletion however, the landscaping justified, I II �' � . of street trees appears to be • 1 1 treatment in this area needs revision. The majority of the 255 foot long . retain) ng wall will be over six feet in height arid potentially could have 1a detrimental visual impact. No vegetation is proposed to soften or screen the wait. A revl,sc.d landsi,ap i ng plan should be prepared by a landscape architect, for , the retaining wall' area The plan should contain a justification for the wall , the I I proposed height of the or most,plant materials that will screen a � of the retaining wall, an elevation drawing i 1•icaytrat.ing the wall and � t:... proposed landscaping, i.arnd landscaping treatment c,f the right-cif-way arena' betuice o the re tai0 i rrgq wa1 1 ,gored the r:ur'h A el V ;xr°1isr11,e1i, 1 1 As rreehtioned earl i or two ' variance re;ours t,s have been mode to reduce the I , landscaping caner~aqe t•o 1 and ' to el mini tr i'4 siderwalk from the Center .. Street driue�Iwr,iy ti) the wc,stern corner r,f the Iii tt ty(4";ty ul c t.ton 10 134 0k)0'_ .. of the t",rrdi 11nt,r1rig .1 pier t,a,;.4 t ■ r 1 tel, ►,� ier 9riarei tnx' d;' - the t -r tIClt,�4�r'a•« tilt, fro v N r, 1 rd 1'I t jj 1'I 1 ;..Iii , 1.,,I, 1e('" „I s,.I,,w rLI,, r .j', r'a,,, i}; "M1, ' 17h • i I , a, The proposed variance 4)ill not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code,` be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; b, There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the II lot size or topography, circumstances or other over which the ' . applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties same ' g district; ct� . � ro ernes in the ronxn diatri • c. The use proposed will be the same as permitted unde► this Code and d City be maintained to the greatest extent that is standards reasonable possible while permitting some economic use of the land; easana l p p 9 d. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to 0 traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would o ccur if f the development were located as specified in the Code; and e. The hardship is not self—imposed and the variance requested is the p p ' q minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. .0 The proposed variance to the landscaping coverage requirement is minor and it will be difficult to notice a difference between the required minimum (6 square feet) proposed. (�5,(5,680 square feet) , The h ,317 s uar� feet and what is property ert y is lon g and irregular in shape e with street frontage on virtually the entire perimeter which has presented unique problem;*, related to right—of-way dedication, street improvements, and internal circulation. The proposed Uses, are permitted in the CG zone l and the request will hot adversely affect physical or natural systems, Finally, the hardship is not self--imposed' because the primary reason for the variance is due to the irregular parcel configuration, The request appears to be the minimum necessary and I.also, the required modifications to the landscaping plans a slight increase in the �.n lens will cause he site and landsca amount of landscaped area . I The proposed sidewalk variance also appears to be justified for the following reasons State Highway right- of way and tho ombariklnent for ` pacific Highway lies to the west of the property along center Street and the potential for any extension of the sidewalk is minimal. Because of tho 1a e amount of frontag u, tho applicant is ,.eapons tblri for a substantial quantity of, street ifpruvornonts and this portion of sidewalk would ho of min im l valUo arid it could actually ' " probl'eIt1, by or7t 4at,1r«tti thq bodoqtrians pd t ro is the street to tho m idd l r ,}( t.FI(, ttG, I 1)1,,s1 d'I i. �J�' F ,?Nry it(�I Sl1 y 5+ ,(,a, w, ..,. ......... . ... r ai 4,1 e,14. n .rA.ann.,rv.,....a_t. r.... � .. . .. ,, ,J , x • t 1 `+' 1 ' .._. ..M.».n,.1,+1w..':-.ek.r.J,ir«m:A...,«a..d,+w:1«.... w-,W.....%.« -i+=-N^ J(.,... y„ w,.(4::..uF.xaW-I,..Y...:Y.-.V]t+-..'y_.r-,:.,•o+M w+_!»a, ..KN:»u.JaA>' w4 . . ( ( The applicant_ is providing, all other half street improvements as required by City Code and the development will be able to adequately accommodate pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the perimeter of the . site, i , 5. Signage O ' . The applicant 'is proposing to install one 20 'foot tall. 100 square foot sign and the standard Code requirement's allow for signs 20 feet in height and 70 square feet in area However, during the Site • Development Review process Section 18. 114. 130 (g) (3) allows up to an additional 50% increase in sign copy area for developments which have ' • multiple tenants. The project will have four businesses and the proposed sign appears to be appropriate and it is consistent with . City standards. 6, Pac�if is Highway Off--ramp to Commercial Street . alleviate traffic circulation As pa,rc. of a long range plan to alleva. problems in the downtown area and on Pacific ''Highway an exit ramp p J to the subject has been proposed from Pacific Highway ad'acent property to Center Street and then on to Commercial Street. The ' ° Engineering Division recommends that the development of this site does not preclude the eventual construction of this exit, C, DECISION •06 subject to the following The Plann�,ng Director approves SOR 6-06/V 3 conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET' PRIOR to ISSUANCE OE BUILDING PERMITS, 2. Standard half-street improvements including n g sidewalk curb , wheelchair ramps, driveway apron, storm drainage, guard rail (partial - ,' • frontage) and utility gnal� nrelaxo be in stalled along the SW Pa cific Hwy, frontage, Said m rovem n tg along SW fi Pacific Highway shall be built to Major Arterial standards and conform to the alignment, of existing adjacent improvements and conditions of the State,, Highway Division permit, ' 3 Standard half-street improvements including sidewalk curb, pavement markings, wheelchair ramps, storm drainage and utility relocation ,R ' shall be installed along the SW Greenburg Road frontage. Said improvements along SW Greonburg Road shall be built to Major Collector standards' and conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements and conditions of the C i t s Street, Opening Permit ,� F 4 Standard half-street improvements Including (Partial � rro<nt.,,,r.ge1 . s idewaiK curb retalni ng wall dr 1 vewt y Aaron, tcrr dra1r it and utility relocation shall be installed along the SW Center Str'r,.et 1 ' frontage said improvements SW center Street shall be built tr Lu( al 1. Street ' standards and conform to the alignment of erciStirttj ad).Ac nt f ' . 1mprnvemen1 i and I t.rid1 t ittri or t.he .CI I Y, �t,r'eet Openlrig !'erin1 t r , jj 19 St t,) 'I. It r !, r tr, lt, r , d 41 , n • fir I it • �° k I 5. Five (5) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans ( ) estimate, stamped by a "Registered • and 1 itemized construction cost e Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public . improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval, 6. Sanitary sewer connection details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plains. 7, Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until . . pp � p after the Engineering Section has issued approved Public im rouements plans. The Section will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation fee Also, the , execution of a street opening permit shall occur prior to, or • "' concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. • SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MOREEPSECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES, BONDING AND AGREEMENTS. 8- Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public at the Pacific Highway Greenburg Road intersection to provide for a turning lane onto Pacific Highway from Greenbu rg Road. The description for , . said dedication shall be tied to the existing right-of--way centerline as established by Washington County, The dedication document shall • be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section, DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED: 9. A Permit shall be be `obtained by the applicant, for work;, proposed t ca • be done within SW Pacific Highway from the State Highway Division. A copy of said permit shall be provided to the City. ,`10, Visual clearance at drivewaiys and at intersections shall be provided for in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 18. 102. 1 1 . A traffic a nd pedestrian co n trol pavement marking, signal and d signing n g P 1 prepared db y n r�g registered engineer etailing a proposed , marking and signing improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval and to the State Highway Division I 0 for approval. l?, Direct vehicular ingress-egress at Grcenburg Road shall !lot he permitted. 13 . Concrete sidewlk shall' be installed from the proposed driveway apron on Pacific Highway, along. Pacific Highway. along Cr"eenburg Road, along Center Street, to the proposed driveway apron on Center Street i,' t4 Relocation of any oxasting uti l.itie$ , poles, pipes , wires, sitgnals , r he ^' y the s irlrr0l loops or ar�y Wu(,�� '�et�uiptrtt�nt shall k�G aa. the s�xp�n!�M of ;t�a� �;� , y I Ic ao� Ip • Ir'. (l9 h` 1.7��`►'�' 41t ",L ,i�'�r ;17�' v. II( )t"t, ... ..._.._ .. .._,.„w ,. «..e.>wwwM+w»......tr,..«,...,,�i�i.»..,.-..,. ..rr,....,. µi.. . .,uca:ua♦::,,,w..re,.u..a+v.i.............mow'._:e1:.rn«+k,.:' 15. A revised site plan shall be submitted for Commuirity Development °" Director approval which /eletes the proposed driveway on Greenburg ' Road and illustrates the location of the proposed free standing sign. 16. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted for Commuri' ty Development Director approval which is consistent with Chapter 18. 1'2 Visual Clearance, Specifically, the two Red maple trees adjacent to the Center Street and Pacific Highway driveways shall be deleted and verification shall be provided that the mature height of other landscaping materials will be less than three feet. Also, the' landscaped area shall not be reduced to less than 13.5% of the total lot area • • 17. A landscaping plan, prepared by a landscape architect, shall be submitted for Community Development Director approval which deals with the retaining wall including the following: a, Landscaping materials to screen all or most of the wall b. Elevation drawing of the proposed retaining wall and plant materials, c. Landscaping material between the retaining wall and the curb. • d , Reduction of wall m as height g � much as practical 18, Maintenance of the landscaping within the Center Street right—of--way • shall b e the responsibility of the applicant/property owner • 19, The one free standing sign shall not exceed 100 sq. feet per side or a total of 200 square feet. • lots 1000, shall be combined into one parcel , Tax lat LC01, and 1100 sh 20 21, This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below, 0, PROCEDURE ♦ '+.- 1 . Notice; Notice was publishe d in the newspaper, posted at Ci t y Hall and mailed to XX The` applicant &owners XX Owners of record, within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planni.nq Or°gani :ratrors XX Affected governmental atlencir+rr C rr1r 1 l "I'Eii. ULCXSI.UN SflAk.l klk 11IVF1l ON March 15, 1906 11Nk l"Sb AN nP{r k,F'rt I`+ t . ,c11+ !: lyl }11 lra'it I. ' - e.t ,,. - .. . . .. .,LV. :..be .............i...««:-rW.J.i .o-a .+.w.- 4w +ni.l.c✓..,.F «.. .I..A..i.l.d+. . , .W.. r.1,-. Q T I . , ( 3, Appeal ` Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.82.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which', provides that a written appeal must be filed , with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 2:30 P.M. March 25, 1986 , 4. uestiohs: If you have an ,_ questions, please call, the City of • 4 y y Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. . e• r I I i r PREPA•ES BY: K•nth idea, Senior Planner OA . , ......,,....- 0„. , , , f-z/1„,.,.,. j!.. Willtam A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE APPROVED i , .. • (KS's.:2418P/dm3) ' � c.ir, . !,.....21 . . •AillA s • t • ,--L... in p �, ,,Iii s .�� -.kg i I ,,, ,, ,,,,...,,,,,,, „ _� . .t e 1 1,i E4 I 44 ., ill,,,41,# ,,,.‘,,,''',, •‘.14, 4•011k , III!.is!. ..... , , --, , 44* 141; ''(,,•'.,,..., ,,,, , '''''''' , Iii.,„„i'' 1 ',, , • ...,..,.. 4 .-- , ,/''','"')-'-,.,,'''''''•,••*''''-'',,,''... ..:..,..,,,.,..,•-,,,,_ . '6,'',,,..C.,, 4' '''\''41''''''''., NI ___, -......., 1„ i � I u I fi. I I i` t • I I . I ()1E,'} (- t)1, ) t•i. n1ilk' •,11... ,, 14, ,,, ,.1., 1,...,4,, .1 • 3 In , • f I I »,x. +..+..... _.•..i4c'...... .awu,..,;,n:..aw.axw.c:«w...w.�."a..-» i . -i,,u..a,....:. .. ...«.,.r,. ..J..+,la.. ...._..,q.....�. BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, NC ,'). __ i ,,Land Planning, Survey, and Design Specialists" t, i ,. January 31, 1986 • Liden S.Mr. Keith S Senior Planner I,. City of Tigard l / '' , Community Development Dep artment ' P.O. Box 23397 -on 97223 i.,Tig and Ore ' / � Re: Site Development Review Application for 60-Minute T oneRetail orp Inc., the North ',. p am ,� west Corner �{ Development for Gr q. Highway 99W and S.W. Greenberg Road Highway Our Job No. 1898 •• be lu ,ar � r L id en Pdrsualnt to our pre-application conference held on Thursday, January 30, 1986, I want to take, this opportunity to supply your office with the following documentatiori and request a formal review in accordance • a with the City of Tigard site development review process for this project. . This infortnay comp upon the application Information• m glad based tioh has been co sed brochure provided by your affice, together with the Standard Site Develop- I ment Review application. t Review One ( 1 ) original yellow copy of the Site Developmen 1 application with the 'information appropriately provided and f the signature of the owner and/or agent ifdicated You n as the re rep- i, ti rep re-off Is acting receive ve co� i es ��� - should be that auvised th appI cant, and we should p of i , d by your office.i ce. I sentativeentatio�n and. an nc.tice_, Issue e all locum any This information on should be .c.uui,ri,,i teed to our Seattle office at ;, Th�� lnf the fo I l aw i ng address �T Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc, i I 6625 South 1'90tih.r Sui i- e 102 I i Ken�i Wash I ngtori 080'5'2 1 • • ,t p • Mr. K'e i tlr S. L i den a�. • Senior Planner e Development Department -2- January 31 , 1986 `t Community L)eve l c�pm p 1 payable 1 e tot Tigard in the ,;: •,�; �'. One (1 ) check made p y the City of rig amount of $300 for the processing of the site development ' review package. 3. Five (5) copies of the site development plan for the project i • at the scale of 1" 20' providing all of the appropriate • site development details for the proposed project. 4. Five (5) copies of architectural elevation plans providing basic information concerning the t'r rch itectura l look" for the buildings on the site. 5. One (1 ) copy of the Washington County Assessor's map for the property with the parcel outlined in red. 1. 6, One (1 ) list of the names and address of all persons owning property within 100 feet of the subject site. • d' 7. One (1 ) copy of a title transfer instrument/deed to the site • verifying the legal description and the current ownership. 1, 8. Five grading/drainage(5) copies of a site rading/drainage and utility plan for the project providing information regarding storm 0 y drainage improvements, site grades, and sanrit ar se wer ; service for the project, • 9. Five (5) copies of a site survey worksheet completed for the 1", -. property providing existing topographic information and 11 , •. location of a l l existing public and private improve menis. 10: Five (5) copies of a preliminary landscaping plan providing the required information Incorporated within the app I l cat icon requirements. .� . r+. • 11 Five (5) of � P tO osed sign application, Io n, together w i lh .` p sign providing advertising for the. justification for the pole s1 n p 9 the proposed project, The sign being requested is larger d, 1 than that which is allowed a hder the standard provisions r ,.., i 50 percent increase tf code, hut is within i tti the by your of f i t e P able rand" r� ndr�� n i str°at`I ve review i 2 , One ( I ) copy of` the variance application suppori i ng the ' requested reduction I n the landscaping area on the site' a5 r�. forth i n the site plan • • • Mr. Keith S. L i d e n Senior Planner Community Development Department -3- January 31 , 1986 this O t Would you please begin the processing of thr5 Site Development e1 p men 11 ,,• Review application and forward to this office your written response and • approval as soon as possible. The application documents Incorporate the comments that wer e made e b y your staff at both of our previous meetings and, hopefiutfy, the project as i ts designed will meet with your approval . We ' .. . ,. . • c are also aware of your;, requirements for the building permit review, and we .. will be sure that our final plans, which will be prepared at the same scale, w i l l be complete in the necessary details for review. I t should be noted combined with the large k''`' that the unique conflgurai ion of the property, co ' amount of street frontage around the site, has created a need for several code regulations 'which" need to be addressed in variances from the existing c the site review process. At the same time, we believe the design of the ` project has hopefully resulted in `a creative approach to the use of the site. The following specific comments should be taken into consideration in :• your review. 1 . We Will be bringing the entire project approximately to grade with Highway,, 99W. This particularly applies to the westerly' • portion of the site which is currently vacant, The filling I "'- , • of the;slte will result in the ne ed for a slo p e ease m en t on the Oregon Department of property tat the west from 'th g P i adjoining ..prop y Transportetion, and a retaining well along the north property :' boundary adjacent to Center Street. This retaining wal I „ . I w i l l be variable I n height from a minimum of 2 feet to a • maximum of approximately 12' feet. A guardrail w i I l e , provided along the edge of the asphalt, and the design i'. ,,e,-- drawings provide a cross section of the proposed construct- i , flop. As agreed the wall will be constructed on the property line with the landscaping strip lying inside of the , • wail on the site itself. Specific design ,c alcul at i o ns and a ; report from a certified soils engineer w i l l be provided with , . the building permit plans 'for this part of the project. ` the site will ll be completed I n accordance with ; 2. The f i I I i ng on th ' • standard geotechn i ca I recommendations for the Placement of $ ' Once `and recommendation r, areport fiIi ._ n r~ again l , structural i g .r will be provided with a building permit for this part of the r project, and continuous reporh., for compaction w i l l be available during the f i l l I rig pr ° ribs• All of the work in e this regard l b . ri r„r. the eu ery 1 s 1 on' of a O- will i e completed Cr�t`�'d u +� t qua l I f i rod r r otechn i ca I roneu I i dry i . t ” 3 The on the property has resulted ..►� ar�rr�ur�`f of s f r•r�e:i• frontage p " i r y In a level of reff esito improvemeni being required for the development which far exceeds thei `which 1 reasonably dove w.pc3irtori f or norfis, l �ac�h�r�irx► r'I rir��r,,i,�i�tir�r�i . T1) do•eIopur • • • • '. ". .. ...., s ..- .. ..,F '. Is,.I..AAN., .-....r1:-.,tea.. a. + . . ... .. . ,. .... _. A..:., ...,.., ..:.';.. .... 4 ...:.: ..+.,...a+:M.�r_...,..FJ..1 r...,A r wn i.-,. .a.:„4..a...,.,,4 RJ. �..I...u-:..x✓..,..44-.••....J.-w.. :SI.Arc:.,. /V Mr Keith S. l i den Senior Planner- r • iCo nm un t Y Development De ar Department -4- January Y 31 , 1986 '. r is proposing to complete these improvements and dedicate the ': additional t I ona i r i ht-of-wa y necessary to accommodate the street , improvements in accordance with the requirements of the City l of Tigard and the Oregon Department of Transportation. 8 I 11 .• • . . $. I I 41 1 .O . 1 • :imps.5oy.i.iie._e dent of . treet fr. a• ge wh h_ t s. n•er•.aJ.1-y. roes i dared excess LYe I for .+j ' • • • ••11-1 •nd we >"L aka i t4LS?n i ,gat ion The hor�Q� that th`i ski nn format r on i I I property boundaries are quite ` 1� tt . �Y i Per �'or prop irregular, and present unique problems for developing a usable layout for the site. Duel'to the unusual con f i gura- a �, tion, accessib i f ity to bu ildings and placement of structures r. in parking areas becomes more difficult with respect to existing city codes We have been able to meet all of the requirements of the Clty of Tigard Zoning Code in this LI . °. ' regard, With the exception of the landscaping requirement. The required amount of landscaping for this project is 15 percent. The gross site area encompasses 42, 115 square feet, � �e,n d the required u(red i andsca i n g area would d th erefo re be 6,317 7 q :J square feet. We are proposing to provide 5,680 square feet, ' which represents 13.5' percent, of the gross site area ',' are therefore requesting an administrative variance of this landscaping requirement in accordance with the attached k. variance application We are Providing more intensive landscaping within the areas on the site than is required by code, and we will also be landscaping some property within area ' : :' the existing right-of-way, which increases the gross., . ..' . r •. being landscaped as a part of this project. We assume that points into consideration in the review w these p will be taken ' to cons of the variance application ' 4. �uri ig the pre..-development application conference, we I J 1 ,discussed the requirement to install sidewalks along the 1' property frontage for the length of Center Street. The site ' plan that we have s ubm submitted proposes that sidewalks k' s be extended along Highway 99W from the proposed curb acce ss to this state highway, and then extending east and north around through the intersection with S,W. Greenberg Road; The ,$,i dc walks would extend continuously along S NW» Greenberg Road, around the intersection with Center Street, and up to thu Ecurb cut into � �t pr�ja ct on Center S treet itself, de and the curb cut„ we would propose to simply widen the street to l' a distance 17 feet from the center. i ne, and then install curb • ' and gutter, Th i � would leave a strip of land 7 1/2 feel in within ih � r is ht-of-way, (roil, thr: bock of the curb lcl width t G� t'! i h ' id w pr*" 4, I i rl. to Ol l ow 'hv ihu fui ur o construction nt t i •.; . . A r . I ,. 1 dl n. a " .' '. ' • • • , «., .» Malp....w1.. .•W:.tidi..•a.n«f4.,:.-.fiM.a.::.4.R4....:.,.......+r »f . t, f Mr. Kci-1.h S. Li den '; Senior Planner January 31 , 1986 Development Department -5-- omrnu nit. P C P sidewalks in this area. Our reasoning not to install the • sidewalks at this time includes the following points ,- a. As indicated earlier in this letter, the developer Is i.• : . already being required to participate in an excessive ,, amount of public improvements due to the configUratlon e and the extensive frontage. I f it is not - �- of the sit .• , absolutely necessary for the public` health, safety and install a sidewalk along Center Street, then ., . welfare to l we would propose to delay this construction. This ' •. developer in re- .w ,. . ' would provide some relief for the de of the property cognition of the unique configuration p p , and the hardship that it presents, which is not appiic • able tG other in the area. • b» p e are proposing a retaining wall along Center Street W ro P for most of the property, as shown on the sit • • plan. ' ' There w i I i therefo re be no access from the site ' center t traffic until • near the intersection tith s. w. Greenberg Road. There- w .. � the need fore, Pedestrian movement will not encouraged on this side ,of the street. This,..,would reduce t • for a sidewalk at this location. c. Sidewalks do not exist west of the subject site on ' ' Center Street on either side, and there are no side north Center Street adjacent to t. ,. on poll of de of Cent J � . � walks • businesses and houses which the :buslne -7 .. the property. ' , exist along Center Street lie to the north -)f Center Street across from the subject property, and the appropriate place, to install sidewalks in the future would be along the north side of the street. If side- ., • - •, walks were installed only on the south'` side of the street adjacent to the sub.ject s i t e, this would encour- age pedestrians to potehtially cross in' the middle of the block on Center Street to:reach the sidewalk, which would not be in i he best interests of the City, of 1 Tigard. J e r Street k w not con, i dor"'ed s i din i f I cant d, Traffic c�n C r�t ra� � t i r relatively i a t f v el minor acs e a 1 roiut compared with S>.W Greenberg Road and Highway 99W. Therefore, • the need for a sidewalk along S.W. Center Street would .l ; be limited to provide for adequate pr destr Ian safety, • i , I Mr. Keith S. L iden Senior Planner community Development Department -6- January 31 , 1986 i information , . Please review this reasoning the inform provided p t �.: and determine whether or not the requirement for sidewalks along Center Street can be waived for this project westerly of the curb cut near the northeast corner of the site. 5. Another issue of concern during the pre-development reviews L conference related to the proposed "right in/right out" curb access to S.W. Greenberg Road near the southeast corner of the property. This curb access location is considered quite critical to the successful operation on the site and to ' l mit'traffic congestion, once again, within the site itself and at the other two access locations. We understand your concerns o p tential left-hand,turning movement for traffics regarding trY ing to turn left into the site northbound on S.W. Greenberg Road. We would therefore propose to install a ? Iimlte6 length of "C" curbing delineating the northbound and ound lanes o g soui'hb on S.W. Greenber Road fora I i m i ted distance north from the intersection. The curbing would not l:, •; prohibit access into and out of the bank parking lot ea east o f the property, b u t would p revent left-hand turning o movement into and out of the subject project. At the same time, it ould allow for the movement of southbound traffic on S.W. .. Greenberg Road into the property to avoid additional vehicu- lar movement through the intersection with Highway 99W. it would also allow cars entering the subject site off of y;• • Highway 99W to park in front of the retail spaces and Then ; . exit the property at one of the two locations, thus giving ' • . an option to the customer, rather than requiring all of the traffic to enter and exit the site at the same location. Once again, the configuration of the property severely f': limits the layouts that are possible f or development oP m et of the , site; and curb access onto the adjoining streets Is critical for the successful development of the project. If the center curbing proposed on i S.W. Greenberg Road would el i m i n- • ate the majority of the concern of your Transportation Department for traffic movement on S.W. Greenberg Road, then we would hope that the curb access would be approved as shown, 6= Finally, the Hpp l I c ati an lid l jdeu a reque � for a large' sigit an I!, normally allowed under the zenInt CCCt � e rC o1 i l l passing 1.05 square feet. The reason for the request is i a 1' the i rtter�- two-fold. First of all , heavy traffic viol yes section c tirr a rd the relatively at i ve l Y high h speed allowed on Highway 9gW tends`' le I i m i I the perception time for motorists hear the l; • r g , II e, ,-.,.,. .,a.,„.. .•.. �+,..,u«—.� Min�. ... u....,, ... �. } . / 9 i', Mr. Keith S. !Alden fib Senior Planner ' ' Community Development Department -7- January 31 , 1986 , ,w • • , t and due to the channeli- ro c site to become aware of the p J , zation and intersection control at S.W. Greenberg Road, the potential customers of the property's businesses may not e that the business exists until they are past the realize M t It is therefore necessary to obtain as much' I I property.� necessa j' . ' advertising as possible to allow people ample time to corn- , plete their lane changes and enter the property. Secondly, .. I the street` on f there are a number of businesses built close to t� • Highway 99W, and there are a myriad of poles and other obstructions which limit visibility along this street. Once again, in order to obtain reasonable exposure, it will be i ,. necessary to achieve a larger sign area to the extent ,, g i ines of City of allowable within the administrative lade) • • Tigard. , I hope this provides yo u with a complete e t e package a e of information necessary to review this project. if you have any questions or wish to . discuss it in further detail , please do not hesitate to contact me at (206) 872--5522 at your convenience. I certainly appreciate the assistance that your staff has provided to us i n the pre-design effort on this pro Ject, and 'I look forward to a successful development approval within the next 3 days. Thank you. Respectfu:ll,y,' fir LL r� ausen h • Thomas A. Bagh r P.E. Q i • I President t ,; TAB/sm r . I r., � ens As Noted cc:I Mr. Barry Cain, Gramore, Inc, (w/ one. ) fi Inc. (w/cnc0 )r� aob Qeaupre� r Crarnore,' Mr. Dennis J. Donovan, Bar~ghausen Consulting Engineers, I no. f •.o n I { ■...N, , 'V ' . r • I i ,,,, ATTACHMENT•„ TO GRAMORE, INC. , LANDSCAPING VARIANCE SU MM ARY OF RESPONSE TO VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA `s' : .. provides summary g for request for a i h q : • This attachment rovides the summer arguments l • landscape variance for the above-referenced project to reduce the required I • • landscaping area by 1 .5 percent. The required landscaping for this .• : particular project within the zone classification is 15 percent, or approxi- , ''` mately 6,317 square feet. The requested reduction amounts to approximately i .. •. . 10. 1 percent of the gross required landscaping area, which' is the :limit of the requested variance. The specific approval criteria for a variance, identified as Section "A" through "E," are summarized below. The actual ' ' amount of on-site area provided is equal to 5,680 square feet, which is 637 square feet less than required. , A. The proposed reduction will not be materially detrimentai to the ' ' ', R purposes of the code or in conflict with any comprehensive plan 4 policy. The llandscaping that has been provided is reasonably ' e required landscaping, and the supplemental •, . ^„ close to the • landscaping proposed within the excess right-of-way along Highway ' " 99W, which amounts to an additional 4,300 square feet of area, we l . would exceed the required landscaping percentage on the site . 1 itself. There are no surrounding uses of a residential 'nature . ` which would necessitate more significant landscaping standards or buffer areas, and for this particular project which is completly .. . . bounded by public streets, the primary purpose of the landscaping ' ;°, is to develop a more aesthetically pleasing project in accordance I, with general development pri nc i pa i s. The specific percentages 'I • are not necessary to buffer the project from surrounding properties. 1 B. This particular parcel is unique to all other properties in the b area since it is bounded on all sid es y Public blic right°of-way. .. • • 1 .,iwh parcel itself is approximately one acre in size and not only I has over 800 feet of street frontage, but 'it also has a long narrow configuration which requires, an excessive amount of .1 !r :, Perimeter landscaping, coupled with an excessive extent of off- ,•J r site improvements. The a PP I i c ant has n° control over the i ^op ert y . boundaries, which also makes i t extremely difficult to Place buildings and Improvements on the subject site within I r the code regulations. As the property becomes more narrow toward to i' south, I t i s necessary to Increase the asphalt' spha l t' area 10 order tcw } clear that other � , gain n a��ess tw pr ()Posed 4,�r�l�;turd>` I �� l*� clear pt.onert l e5 Immediate In � i c i n{i ��r r not affected In the same / ,.. mran7nr r as t i l l: par ce•eI , t r r n r i this 1 pet ei rtiutrt be cons id .red un i quf.a. . I , 1898,02 _ 1 t, i • 11+"4!! ',. 4 '' ,...,',,k,' . . ' ,, f(1y•. I ' t ,1.....•.,.,Y...r,+l,at-.,,u ....«..w . .,.!' ..,4...A.:a:.v:.•..a Jw....AS::w4•_,..«�.wv::i....,...,...+.w::�.,.Jm1+a..,., j r C. The uses proposed are identical to the uses allowed within the code, and no variances are being requested. " Extensive public P ' improvements are being provided by the applicant for the Burr und- ' ing street system, and this presents a significant economic 1 .. burden to th s particular applicant based on the Property con_ ; '' figuration. To the greatest extent reasonably possible, City '', standards have been met, while permitting the economic use of the . , land. The requested variance in the landscaping area is therefore ,. . being justified to offset the extensive public improvements being , required. I I I , D. Existing physical and natural systems will not be impacted one way or the other by the landscaping on the project and, therefore, . .• the subject variance will have no im p act on these systems. f : E- The hardship that would be created by requiring the applicant to meed the code requirement is not self imposed and is due specifi-- ; caliy to the fact that the unique configuration of the property necessitates careful review' of development alternatives in order to meet other applicable City standards. These other standards include access driveways, parking requirements, and other restric- r tions, The variance being requested, which amounts to 10 percent of the gross amount of the required landscaping area on the site, l is the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship and , would probably not be noted by any surrounding property owner or ; parson in the area In addition, the extra landscaping which will be provided b y the`applicant within the right-of-way will help to } compensate for this loss of area. , I r ! II !• . • tl. . fl I , ;r I I I , I , ti 9 I • ' I f n '1111 _ . • 1 ♦ r H . • (4h r - ^ , • air i!f BA6 RY A CAIN r RA M .E l'. Jne Lincoln Ce n to r, x470 � •ro. t 0300 S.W Greenbwg Rd ; Portland, OR 97223 (5031 245.,1976 r r ' I • r I 11/4. TRAFFIC Y lV1 P f1r C'i' STUDY D Y f. INUTE TUNE DEVELOPMENT ,H' r 1 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY (99W) AND GREENBURG ROAD 1 r TIGARD, OE..EGOIf r 1 �rr ,• I II • I r�P i Prepared for ' 1 I I:. 1 , ,rq Marcch, 1986 • , r ec 1 Y .0 1 1 1 1 . . ' i I t . .) 14 198i,M I a r� K w i;`•r. t c' ' r , • ` \\`I I ,S!''V',,,, k I \\I r. O • r r � • • .I a: •r , • r , : • f • TIO x,.. INT'ItODUC i �t • r, Sco Pe of Study r • This study was undertaken to analyze the traffic impacts associated with the proposed y development of the 60 Minute Tune `'retail project located at the northwest corner of S.W. I, P • Pacific F-iighway (99W) and S.W. Greenburg Road in Tigard, Oregon. Figure 1 shows the eneral'location'of the project site. Specific issues discussed in this report include: g • o' Trip characteristics expected fr from th e site for proposed osed development. 'r o Site access location and operations. 0 Traffic impacts to adjacent streets. Internal site circulation. C • l This study was prepared following gidelines set forth the Oregon on S tate` •li g hw a y Division "Minimum l,equiirements for Traffic Reports Proposed Development" and • discussions • with City of Tigard planning department. • ra. Project Description • feet o f tainin 9 lUU square e • This proposed project consists of two separate structures can g 9,100 q retail space. Twenty-five (25) parking spaces` will be provided on the site.' Three access/driveway(s) have been originally proposed for the site and will be discussed later 'in 4 , this report, Figure 2 shows the proposed site plan for the property, The developer is in the process of securing leases for the floor space designated I Y Pe Retail/Service 'A' and 'B'. Possible tenants include other automotive-related retail ; 60 Minute Tune attd carwash facilities. The commercial f zoning zonin operators to compliment the 6 does allow other retail uses, so for j,the purposes of this report a worst case" condition in • terms of site generated traffic, will be analyzed. The "worst case"'condition included 4,350 g feet of the ',6U Minute square feet of convenience store/,.,pecialty retail use, 2,450 square Tune retail space and 2,300 square feet of the carwash facility. EX TING CONDITIONS tl. Adjacent Land Uses The project site resEntlyl' contains a copy shop, a radio and television repair shop, a small I; h e p ) (� furniture shop and a vacant retail space. / single-family home is located at the northeast • portion i of the Northerly across Center Street is a dress shop in a two story r'esi iencc. o� the site, �lortl7 p � I � across S.\, , Ct�.enbur Road is a branch of the Oregon Bank with two drive-thru ,r p Ca�terl�� across r s x f'� i 9'\V is a small piece of landscaped lanc1Y r: ��+iitl�r:rl� �i��r��s��� 11i �it tiJu�}� � r is , .1 Adjacent Street Nw tw()rl•: Y I x• S.W. Greenbiurl R d is a tw `� y north-south local collector linking portioni, of T`rk]ard, a southwest Portland, Metzger and Progress to Main Street in Tigatd. ;Interseo.titi ; Highway 99W at thy site under coinsidi�er-c.a tir o, Greenburg Road is a two-way street . on silt ing of an toil) lhtnsr and ,+ thr•oii;lt 1rRi f fig;/Ic:'ft turn lane in l l i;;lt i�lt a L " \ I'�L I ��� � � \\t I , • I # I / ,.. ., ._ . ... . w • • } west of the of�'f five designated tc. d lanes . 99W is a two-way east-we,t Istdtc. .highway consisting g intersection with Greenburg Road and six lanes on the east of the Greenburg intersection. Highway 991V has four lanes approaching the intersection from the east with exclusive right turn and left turn lanes and two through lanes. This side of the street is separated by a one • • foot wide concrete median. The Highway 99W approach from west has an exclusive left turn lane with two lanes for straight through and right turn movements. This street has a posted 40 mile per hour speed limit and parking is not permitted adjacent to the site. he�• described intersection is currently controlled by actuated signals. The five-phase signal 1.. . a. em tion controlled signal heads are . . second ',.cycle. Fire re- g • econ �. • s P operation approximate to 12� p .. .sera tlan has an appr x Y located on the Highway 99W approaches. The traffic and pedestrian signal heads are , . mounted on mast arm supports. .• is u. T r f 1 a 1Co times an d �cak Hour tiffs f y & Ham conducted peak obtain existing count streets, 1",/llse, "', data on the adjacent street hour turn movement counts ' To obt traffic c Highway g Road intersection on Thursday,' • sat the H1 h wa 99/G reenbur Ro , March 6, 1986. Driveway usage count data at the present site during the 'rush hour was • , collected on-Monday, March 10 1986 during the p.m. peak hour. Figure 3 shows the existing 1 p.m. peak hour traffic movements at the Highway 99W/Greenburg Road and Greenburg N.. Road/Center Street intersections. ' Prom the traffic count data it was determined that the p.m. peak hour (4:25 to 5:2,5) would be typically the period of highest volumes on°the streets adjacent to the project site. The intersection capacity analyses to be performed in the study will exarnine traffic operations) only during the p.m. peak hour. ' The current level of service of p.m, peak hour traffic operations was calculated at the two `N.�,, key intersections adjacent to the site. The signalized Highway 99W/Greenburg Road intersection was analyzed utilizing the operations and design critical movement technique described in the 'Transportation Research Circular No 212, Interim I\Aaterials on Highway Capacite: The stop sign controlled Greenburg Road/Center Street intersection section operations •. were analyzed y zed usin g the C PC L,, microcom p uter software develo p ed b y Roger Creighton , ' Associates, Inc; The existing p.m, peak hour level of service at the Highway 99 W/Greenburg Road intersection is 'D', with a corresponding volume to capacity ratio of 0.81. The north and • south approaches of Greenburg Road currently operates at level of service 'A', while the ;' Center Street approaches operate at level of service 'l�' during the plim, peak hour:' (Capacity art i.lysis worksheets are included at the back of this report.) • Level of services for a particular roadway or intersection is a qualitative measure of various the traffic factors which influence traffic operations, The factor which influence l riff) . • 1 operations include speed, travel time, traffic, interuptions, freedom to maneuver, driver ' comfort, safety and vehicle operating costs. Six l'c,vels of service have been established and 4 are designated to the lettt'rs A through F, providing the best to worst set vie.`c. in tc.,rrrty of t C y� .w .,i l l c.. r.'a l ti:a o f driver satisfaction. For signal'i cd inter e:c:ti or;,}, tlit, level `,l service is hence y in terms of an equivalent r•itli.,t` of is ritualratit,tte,y,e, :t1r"'4aisero, 'tile_' 'rcaltitr,eky;1`(c.tp.tc:rtr (v/■`) ratio• The level of service 1), with a (t.o r r e s p o 11(1 1 I i tt v/c re tit,:" r•i.arrge of 0.8 - U.9, i!., the desired level of service for design by OL)OT and the City of Tigi d, For unsigroalized intersections, the • level of service is evaluated in terms of reserved capacit)y at each approach to the •t •`• 'I intersection. The level of service r I with a cot responding reserve caii,ac,city 0 to IC vehicle.., , � � '' �, M �.. w � ,,, ,it,,,.�t1,"fit �i,�t �t. }. , icd a rr'Fllft catacli tr a f t t if I • e,t ,t ��re4a ,II ,, I ' � is acceptable for the rtinr+r street 1 fi r � �, ��; c� .. 't\ I. I .•� \ I I \\I I r r..,, • I . .' , '. ( ( ' ' ". . ::.,' ''d Transit l' '-Met busline rnuiribers 5 and 77 serve the site every 15-30 mr+inutes during weekdays. These •T r t p p and Lake Oswego. lines provide trans ortatior� to downtown Portland' t• • • FIJTULLJE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS • Due to the existing intensity of development in the vicinity of the project site, no major 1 • • Du g ,, changes in the traffic characteristics along Highway 99W and Greenberg Road t anticipated. Historically, traffic volumes on Highwaty 99W has grown annually at a rate of `, P summer of this about 2 percent. The proposed project is scheduled to be completed by early , , # • year and the existing businesses will be closed as soon as construction begins. For the • uroses of this report, the existing peak hour volumes will be used as the base case p p . volumes. i, 1 • , . Site-Generated ra tc Forecasts , institute of Transportation Engineers ?rip Generation Report Third, Edition code r • .' The fns p ' numbers 814 (Specialty Retail Center), 846 (Car Wash) and 851 (Convenience Market) were , 1 Used to estimate.the average weekday peak hour trip-ends to be generated by the proposed 1,+ development. The trip gene ration characteristics for the 60 Minute Tune facility were not available from the ITE report, so the generation rates used in this report are based on count • ° ' data from an existing 60 Minute Tune facility in Vancouver,!Washington. � generated by �'r shows the •ross number of p.m. peak hour trips that are expected to be g y Table 1 sho .� g , • two development mixes of possible tenants. As previously discussed, this study wil, examine ' • a worst condition in terms of the site- en The deVelopment �' •.. � Cade c . . �� �� r e['a ted traffic volumes. � .. during the remainder of this study since the conv ce market use ); •. 1 enie mix A' will be utilized 1g • is expected to generate about ten (10) times as many trips as a specialty retail or automotive , • retail store. 1 t would be �. � • . ha `c t Table I also shows the significant amount of the site generated to d traf ft ��, � � the ,�tte. A�cordtn to the ITE Report 45% i . . attracted from the existing traffic flows passing t' According P p p of• ` ';. ! '' of the convenience market trips s end 5�/`o bf the tfar wash 'tri s would be corn rtsed o , • motorists already on High ayay 99W and Greenburg Road. , • i 1 I ti i= a \\'1I ntiI VN,,° I fi \\I • 1 ( C tI' 6 • '1 . ' TA[�C.E t ,. I MENT TIGAI2.D EtN I�EVEL.O , J. b0 lV1INUT'I". TU ' TRIP (GENERATION . PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS �. NET j` , . • ' LAND USE SIZlE(GSE) GROSS I DIVERT D OUT IN OUT I IN OUT . I DEVELOP hAE N T tdLT X A �, I. 60 Minute Tune 1 ,210 3 3 - - ' ` ., 2. Car Wash 2,'100• 55 55 32 32 23 23 ::1, • A 29 2 nce Market 2,250 52 5 _�,5 5 3. Convents. _ . ' , 4. Specialty''Retail 2,100 5 — Total 7,660 115 115 55 55 60 60 • DEVELOPMENT MIX C3 a _ • I 3 3 ; ' I. 60 Minute Tune 1 ,210 3 3 - 23 23 I. 2. Car Wash 2,100 55 55 32 32 3 3 3. Specialty Retail 4,`350 12 12 . — -- 1 Total 7 r 660 70 70 35 35 35 35 z .-. • Notes: 1, GSF Gross square feet of building 2. Source: 11`E Trip Generation Report, Third Edition �. f The site generated trips were distributed to the surrounding area using the following general directional distribution, North 30% South 20% ' • East 34% ' • West - 1696 • This directional distribution Is based on population estimates clevs:ico,.p,'d ;b,, .11 i ,kk .i��! the percentage of passing traffic volumes s on the adjacent street system. Alterliatine Sits Access Plat7s 1: : �,i y e/.� tY Y l, q1 y have b` ` ` r q ry to {r 1y p fl,', w{ the 1"����o C�ll t,..rlta.tl��4, �f ll! 4ik�•�.\y ilJ i�11111,^ 1117�1..? 1J Vex 1.11.1 ��I�1:�11`iI l�rd lMJ It,J k.�ll til} `.411.�11t, 111�1�4��,lt�y {p)F tll1. i proposed de vel(i )iiii,ilt, Ac.(-r,ss Plan I c Orl.,,ist., of the drive=way loc:altions ailull turfy toi.'',VC.'ril+„►tt., '••,,ti 1t11cl t.,4•i,1 4`tr,, !iilt.-i,.L'fl in 1'icwtlit* 2 k„.�I-7°,e,..,'1'°./.1t1(,ol1,, el the turn inc,ivizri)ritlt., icitt ,till t i1 LIXistil1c sits! r.ievci.lol`,it`Ic'nt, which eloseltiy nt,ttcli the movements allowed lil Access i,l.:in 1. c indicate the fof loww.win t, , I 1 , No left turns were made out of tllc. Highwati 9 \t nnr c,ruc.ltbur1,, Road 1rf4ewk.dtyi, t• w k1tirme tilt ll..tlr, peak i 10 I l' p7 7,1`,illt' ti'111 114 .tlh, • , i a G11 ring 1 peakx 1 r r ,� k7 . �� , iic to tlii lilt i citrlt,',1 I., . . •. ` .. . .... �,\ � I `"��I ''154'x• �.M •��� I , z he left turn rnovcinent at t as s t4 .. r b , h 5 S 3 used 't c.. by-pass r• ' '' (10) vehicles use � �� .' ;•:..''',, - About ten 10), the,Hiighway 99W/Grcenbur°, inters,,;ctiori. . ta' - ), '''' ° one ve hi le e Xi ted t he si to f•urr the Grcenbura Road access driveway. , - ' No vehicles turned left into the site from Greenburg Road, Due to these existing motorist tendencies, Access Plan 2 was developed to improve potential I • has the, same drivewa'y 'locations and configurations on the' , conflict areas. Access Plan l • r, the Greenburg Road ' • ,,. ' Center Street and Highway 99W sides as . Access Plan I. ' Howeve driveway has been modified to be a right turn in only driveway. ' A right turn in driveway on Greenburg Road allows customers to enter at the front of the buildings without having to go 1 , through the Highway 99W/Greenburg intersection. Th site generated trips were usslgned to the site . driveways (Access Plan 2) and the The adjacent intersections as shown in Figure 4. Figure 5 illustrates the total traffic volumes at " N l ' the adjacent intersections'with the proposed development. y i' , •. Traffic Operrations Analysis h wa th e Hi The p.m. peak hour operations, with the total traffic volumes, at g y i '. 99W/Greenbur Road and Greenberg Road/Center Street ,intersections were analysed using g The Highway 99 W/Greenburg • the intersection capacity techniques previously discussed. -e p level of service 'D with a corresponding Road intersection would continue to operate at a ,. an t d to operate at level ,,' �, v/c of O.R8. The Greenburg Road/Center Street intersection is expecte, a of service 'A' for the north and south approaches, °D' for the west approach and 'E' for the • The 'wei weighted average level of service for the intersection would remain at east approach. g 'A' A traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted for this intersection, but current plus � .. ated traffic volumes do not meet the minimum volume, requirements to warrant 1. µ �•.;• site-generated ;<<.,.� si naii i ation, r ,' Review of Site Plan and On-Site Circulation ite -lan was e)'am y p pacts. . Access Plan I, the original si p � fined to ident'i� otent�i:a! traffic impacts. i •; The visual barrier of the retail space/60 Minute "lune building will minimize'the number of > Motorists corning from, the eas 'and s existing site. . .. by-pas. trips currently using the e �, The two existing � ' will continue to use almost exclusively, the Highway 99W driveway nburg : driveways will be consolidated into a single driveway about 200 feet west of G ree g existing left turn F, ' Road. This driveway Will be used by motorists r,ornin from the west. The • storage e ba stri i,rt will 'provide storage for tl�� vehicles. entering the site f cocci tl7e west. ' :' (A g bay striping . bout one vehicle every two minutes.) • The Center Street driveway will be relocated easterly to! about 40 feet west of Greenburg • e C should not impact the left turn ' ,1' Road. The light amount of traffic° on Center Street p i ... v tent: into the site, ThCq relocation aisc,_ Inrnirnl >,es thri� impacts to thc! itt� grading, mo c Y limitations to the site. Inc proposed curbing shown in ►rcenbtirg Ro.rci to lat oliiibr i let t turn mover ent,s into r and probably' of the site is not a desirable solution. This type of median barrier curb would prob� y become more of a traffic hazard than safety lc ature for the foilo■ inf; reasons: ' iiczil iiitrcir,iIt trnw%tallation. MI toi 1. r ., � The narrowness of this curb is i�c�yt ��i ty'1' � • - Tl'1�., n<ir'rCJ1.1n�5 riot expect a small t"u`llrb to he iii the ini,.idl°z°e',1 thr' ,itt r t. Also, ! ,i1.Y such a small ulmt,a elt' wit flight 111,3) r \\'II ,'`"sI."t 4, I I `�\l • if u....k.,..».tiner.r.rr...L YY Sf ;! The curb restricts bus and 1ar e tri.uck turning movements onto Grrcenburg Road. ) • To eliminate the potential hazard created by, the median curb in Creenburg; Road and to minimize turn movement conflicts at the Greenburg Road access driveway, Access Plan 2 was:develo ed. Access flan 2 differs from the origi al site plan in its modification to the 4 p ••i Greenburg . Road access driveway. This driveway would be designed as a right turn in , driveway. Figure 6 illustrates the geometric design of the proposed Greenbur ;Road access M , n driveway to accommodate only right turn in movements. P•lso, modifications to the proposed concrete island surrounding the existing traffic signal span wire pole are shown on k�figures. CONCLUSIONS The traffic generated by the proposed 60 Minute Tune develo pr Went will not adversely impact the traffic operations of thF, adjacent street system. By consolidating the existing ' two Highway 99W driveways into a cin^►g,le driveway, eliminating the 'turn movements out of the site alon g Greenbur Road and minimizing the convenience 'of using the site as an illegal "left turn" by-pass roue, the redevelopment of the s e will reduce vehicle conflicts in the I area. The p.m. peak hour operations at full de,reloprr t "werst case conditions is expected 1, to be within the acceptable level of service y-Iits at both the Pacific Highway ,'. 4 • I • (99W)/Greenburg Road and G reenburg/Center Street intersections. I • C r • r I I• ,r. I • 1 r .� . I .1 . I • r u I 't 4. ,t.� fa l :,,..iln.0 r fi.J rl It.t. .., «•ui w: " u, � \\ 1 I l ,t.s, ,I i v\l • 1 • 9 • rr a ".„ ..wfa....l- .4+n.v •.P.. w A•LnFu., ..-V •-. tl{ , • . 11Si , •�.o�� - r a~.•1N •• * iR,.. i•I l ....r.� f ..7...............*-i tT q _,e►..+ z ^4.(4.,_ ! a ---'+".• .., .v ac. „,.. i, .' , " '�C '1',••1 �M L[a�1 �„ ..rJ �° -� i' � ` h"'1�tv� i p r,,,r t•lil. , i . IC fI f o „x , alli �r e' .7"~'� �t4' ,-...� .'441 •• i•n SI�,.„rel.P. . �' t� ', DE ., I I �1/ 11 EN .V4 . ; RI a r,•• w t ,xrw•o' rr . y, was sr '1 e •: �' ` ;�.t • •�•• l�"ST 1� I _'r q'^^. •••__LA01w© r���•' 1�1�' r .' 1 M, i r _'4 c& I N p l�C •e• j1ir i A •' zSt � : .M -* rd•- 4 V i . • afstAl'C :: 1 � P M _• , N,.q^`i c,... M ''' I 1 xwr a 41'2 '444 '� ' • .•, f0 AY C klift MfY rK E�r>� ). ti CI . Exit!! • Jts1 • �gyt�r ^P I .,ty�J3 ilk r. " j u,4r..aoo ci U i W 1 • 4 ''L JCT � ,,'v� �t e11 w awCil Ci. ( O� , J - *. 1 y� � � TAY ® ^ ,,. w��ER 1 y fir NACRAYOAQ. w .. �� ! �I. •Cf - iH[C1 tiff Wf,C�'1 s t.. • ill'.:I ;I D °•' e tWf1.Z.t I `MAN '� i 4`' ,t •.J' 0 a 'fr fT Q "•- ' St r. l: rl/r[Yp. jt,� Y ttr�r• 'J S / r , 'f ,t��''''"" MIS ( r w� A I ti • . " alU•.A CI • 4 } '• �' :i �es3 r Akg4 er :�;.„‘ •n •'' •a[�. a ST 1, Rol s,.lrt∎14 CI-;• r.c ,u t .^.,,'.,,,,,,, I _ n rt a � I' ill 6 AI, ,r ESiou. ,• . ..''..Z 1 ®p IOCNSr•. - Sr toc44- g i it.'�S.ArtlKrc ftPCFQtafflN..` •'��• �a� • LLk!•l x • t' . Eli E it • • ie y . t? E• \` 1'tt ct • o,r ti .:«c c aril , " "°"'"['°w FERRY oAtE 114/14 .• ,1 - - ‘\ ° OAK . ® n.H �"� 1y SG�Ol.L v c0 a • «i!1 Q 1 ' is,lcr• • ru i t4n q ^-- �r j a ^ Jam, t . • _.J ' 01, ,� i I w• I [kS o - ' f» ftx tn+u (b T A _ g a T ` - ' '- •• x . I.0 t• t. ii, a J• III tf 7- �11NJM(Y tit.1'U Ludouu(E h M• ,l cwcLf$ L v !t ■ rel.; a . . A/3(LE E S T rElJftJ w t. tom ^' 1 i fe P I star uMf , 1A milli ` ' ' ' p t .� • nil,1 ! n ? '6''' .1.; .,_ r -l'"G€A ': 0. '—d ,t, sw a .w 9 ' wo,,.,t�P UJ � r ' f '-4, - bfi /1,1(iU' , M - . xw . PROJECT S I T E: _ u `"._, ` Ytutatt 4 t( ., •V —E. ci -, '4-'• :cli 0 ,r-ii." ' r\,' _olimis u,-.101. -44.'4 ‘'' 4: - cm.),07--' , , . ' R Nllr it iC � � n° IL.. r. r t� , x 1 ...1 t Nth 1 r . ¢', �' �.! I TI ar: ~�. ,.... r fo•f � r _ � i TI �' .ti:tkt!• ,D0.„,„ Lt ��C_ t', A ,N3 ' cxEs , ,' t'' '� ! fY t��utn.E. lr '� ,t t"r'4 4 �„ U(1 ♦�1 17 4'. �''N ►.,bl ,,44-s i” .a t,,,,,, s, ( ; ''''4"y,ti 4 4 fl• WSE .Rt • A ry'�'`�' tip,� f f "`t+ r � Mdll9+t"K Ct l I f N t tr •1 DOPJAL 0 S r n. } m1. 11 r M r ' u c 5 1141.,/tt 4J N -ua « s - Ci �1 u.,f""�y « ! ,l •'a' 4 /0 .... H ,•It.v rt MI11 It W',� t 1 r r1U .+ - b. 1j.: �..- i ''_•� '.�.,,-r +•• II A � rt � •ii' �• it i • ( I . CI 1. i r 43 ,t ```'.,L -iraa•:g'4 ) K r- 4,.ri I 1 1 51 r. r.�, § =.• 1 VIII • . , vi x PO t J i., rt 1 7 >�,,,f,i r4r,;r 14 .,r t_ J , M ,. ,• P.. /. 'I - zSi +.,. `•: „ 1!` 1..w.. k'. '4' -r. '' .;...,-`.-17""'4:'r' ''-•'r , !+''� ':r,., 11- it-. 1 ^r`'+• t . lK` L i r,,.,.'•' r'A P rS't4 N j r + J1 r n ' .kr `• 1 4'7 r,—ti ' 'I, '','„,.,t.rp �I ,,,t.,:, I� '� ,,,,!..,,,'-'.,,,.,!-.1,4�'- "" ^l..I,' ,, yU�s.1,,,,1 ' '.� k, • 1 , TfR+(.k .ate f'(,y '�''`,.•.�1`Y • Y .+.�"� S�� n,� + S��°t... .1 y�"f� ' tilt,/ , 'I. `. 1 r".►kf i�+, yr •ii,,' I Y. ,.«..:4� Ll.lt+r, q'l`,•`« , fit:! 3' C"'tLr:hlti r• r`■ a 1 ,f+ a J„K • r W,v , b �r ^1+ 1, Y µ 4 f ,.- r r• i r ' i'''''r t . 1. r�r1� ( v�"l a fir, ,1 ti, F,$.. r }t_4[''kw '+.,' C r ,• w i iti , `°t 'J,' '''Z#'4;'''''' t P �i i e Ci ti f a .. tt..), r 7.1. ' p ✓ .1 .ly , ,,.+lM,11$ � ..'.-.-•� ..-.t���� •t'1�•'6.., {�,� ..,,�.,•�«•-."-t .C...,.'4 °'.,`�..'k,� ""r".`°"«,�I..,,,,C �•,, �C4�' • .,, i m^. ».•,.s-•. 1' r 17,x••.'-•"• '' �•� .�1..}J` '�,�.t E"1 4.+�`'`y� �,I,-' y i j . °,,..'•'-"y' 1 v� Lw t�. .�'i'ii .. r.� �•�1,1 l i�i�i:r! , u � v '� � I..�+,*"�.yp,. a'i 1 '` )t. k. Z Il��.., ., ,pp e 9!f , C '' ' r, `w ti 4M, f v. \V°II ,1.,'`I.:E°y I I y\i r, I I I' I a ,, a 1 ( w _ - —_._ .. _ _ . _. 1 �. I • ,. C--I.r: a'. c_ a __... - t . • o f :f'fi ` "°1 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - , —" jitl�° AiL r!4:i. H"]TES- 1 < I `- X. �_-�t_ :... -'-. � �,��v .�. .s..ae�•��.-...:••- LOOE FfifpRUATSESK i•r ,_...;L: C j- e � ' \.,..,t1,;, 1•`- ,-r---1 —.o-- 3 3 -..,..,--....,.....-.-.-_,--z,-_, '.- -...r� - .'mss,........< �� _ 1. r. - - �c �:• f .a �-is f _ C L.ri 4`1, f..._„_,/, '� ( u--,.+ 'a i_-. , f t L ! / ' --'• •_ .'-\ Q` e i -:'s - "- . ice' ri,, y..' ' ..E e .I' r. ! .,,.: f 1j V •.*.. ' ; .. , F j .. r ilk. i-- I y ! E I : J�1 '' � f R i t 1. . 1 ' ` , _.r— ( r � -- {. c..r.Fa's qg ta,�,.,. —— =--�:_z=w.,_.__=tee==� _ _ a (�- •••c-+s �.v .-------.1.-r te- i j- 1 _ ' Vii' -CVY 9 .■wft"a sr■a ,w®..sa —\‘_- 1 c j k_ \, I z t �r ...► lam. 4 .' C j't r E jtt t a e _. - - _ _ • r ,.v.w,��..-....iV 4.,k, Y I..i-.,nr..x.JW++4•..:.-...-:-W�.4"t,-r.:.t+-.+.+,.S.u,,.-.r.-u .w �Ln.,....� , N,, . , u,, Q 10 ,°. CENTER ST. r �. r 1 CJ Q O• 4 • , ,F• , rn rn • ,I . C(� 2.i 0 0 12oo • HWY, 99 W. 1 I k 1 ) ,1'. ', I., I`�'1 LL I N( ► 1'R 'A III*I C Y,+ " `I C O I:1 I u '[: 1 I.. 1'A `1 1 (,11 Eiy r "\P, 1 ( 11r1VVA1 ( r,N 1 K) u i • . I - ` I rA _..., .._....a u.,....-...M,w,...a.,,....,......,......:::....«, ,.a .i.....-x+..+..,,....,.«r-..ter..:�...�-.u-,..w...a:,..=xa:�.cm....,...u«�..-x..�-.�..-._-.is._._...,.x....:_.r. t,.i-,-. �t.• A • • • • • • • • • pp, I •� 1 i [•� ti. CENTER STS • • • • 0 i m . I � I • • U1 I • � ���.� 1, • f I !a r W r ` II ,• 3 -1(71.)(R[ 4 . �;I l'!r ;( �' ( I�, 1'1°I 7 I I, .•\,I' I It, `�( )1 1111 ' I I , • I I II N's 3 • • • • '... ,,,;'• , ' (l'. ' ' • , , (-,, , , , „ , ' . , , ', ',,I,,, . n • Mid✓' r • - I �Q o • CENTER ST. rn rn • r • 2:O )). • O / 2(r �' � +ti Pik � •• . 1C 1 !r .r l i 1S + I )I VC,( (')Pt^+M f,N.1.. (("�. ) ‘,/1:NH Ni' MAR�:I."1 a f=IC; .J rdµ ,'��I�r1I�(��C (.l JI~ Mr •I e - ' e 'r^ •'i; ' • Y•'+ \ \ '.+ .r .:.1,., :...1J~ '4 '• .l,^C2. i. . .• ��,.,i" \ C 41--.`.?- / r"",,...,- , ,.)1 .+ \ 4,014 . \ N.L...0 /SIT);,--.......;" • � k.rE A °AVI , vs , ^1f „ 7 r �•`� � UQ� • )Cj` 7+JL'• 'TM• �• \ ,,,,/ /,. \• / . + \ N «1 / o / r S / \ . r 3 2.'5 1 At d• ' r j t e r ', '\ 1 , d \ V • . \`., 7' .\I, \ 1 ,,,,,,..0**''''''' \ !:),,,,,. - \ - ,..,-'- - 1 *I`'''',,„„.__,k'"- , ..,V 1 , \ II \\ �• d tW�• y.r L r rr it • .�«"•` ,.,, .,_ not +:•f.. ,,.r•"k.^2,L�. t:‘k.r11. �ihi'lit! S 62" 3( 2.8 'V l0 T .+ T•`+v: //,' / i , I w,,r,\ \,.,,,,i„,11 *�., l w , ,,.n.....,. / r ._ ;II()t,,,1JRt1- ( . RI ( °( )r\1MI4NI )I ., a ,I1"1 PI ,,,\N N NA( )1 )II IC AaIIllN . I \ II ; IV4,,v1 �I \\1 } • n "` i• • r ,n IF . a r f r 9 l" ,c,.9 J .�, �J. '..." I .. . 1.. %, I I 'Y.., 4 "4,.. / \I �. • L_ I 4...l A d ',•' L./ . w, lc ! ton ' F � rm 2 h . , Ca u a Form - �' ter�eciS.w. � ,c.1 IC wH ��� 9lw Gu. auc ti '.M, E\\ ., . — � • • Problem Statement EXt T11JG ^Step 1. Identify Lane Ceorrretry Seep S. Develop Passenger Car Step 8. Step 9a, N � Approach 3 (PCV) in pch Calculate Volumes PC V ,. Approach 3 'Lane j ,i,i 1 N W AT. 2�0 Adjusted Volumes Volumes PNuFrc , '_" ii ox (q�W TH = 1200 Total Alijtistod' No. PCV _._. M ,, H Move- PCV PCV M per I .s�_. t cv I._ F- LT 4.gC' nicnt (Step 71 U W (UMW+PCV) Larks Lahr a ~r i31 3 % 1 315 t� .,....�... -•--* < A t `"1 2 S a. 4 6 .• i a .)3S z t d * 1 295 1 a Approach 4 LT = 110 111 . . p,3+k ISO 1 1E l� lit • • Step 2. Identi Cowl Volumes (rH ; � — _ • . P f.� .3' R T_ 1 p H n N 5 -times aroma b� A� f ii V) in vph 4, h I test 1 �v ill• Q Approach 3 Approach 1.= 1.67 2f I� c FIT= -- } Step Volumes Step 9b. Volume Adjustment for c t1� ..ate 6. Calculate Period Vo t- r 1-- LB. a LT 2eo `PV) in pch Multiphase Signal Overlap ` Possible Volume Adjuitc1 Approach 3 PHF r. 0 90r Probable Critical Carryo‘dt Critical r. Tx 2,6% cW �Q- ? (f1J1 Phaic Volume to next Vol Irr) i .,r - m — FIT!.--- �_ in prh phak in prh . I L&- T= 1,a"" o n. h' H a TH I'3G • .. p CgL� 3t5�l°io��t) 190 a 11- I x I-- B t t6 _ I9 x' 0 x rz I-� -t LT= 3l5 a Ra t (75 M) 6,10:tZGC*Z) (2,5 s L r I-O ti�/. 0 01 -.- . e cl kt 14,Z 51.19 Ctz,� SL4 S `�}� " $cis LI3= 0 K o o �, 2.9G p M 4 2, S r. 10 3 tom- 9 • I R T .J rx WC�-►Y 4 pproach 4 H �j,.., `' Step 3. Id'entrfy Phasing, s' o•01( b-.1 -A. 3 190 M 1 -�-A Lr _ 0 ii ' -4..A.t f ril =..•.2E w t k Step 10, S'ttrtr of Critical "� AJB �� ad,34 RT th P • proactt n. ~ VOlttrrfes R 315 „,c. . I gt� ' Az 13,1 ''''It mt3 Step7. Turn Adjustrtrent. + .,.�._. . 0 tep 4, Left Turn het . Mo�emcnt 4 p a n f � . S•tApp h 'te I Itense 1f7'� e 1 of •.Ntambr r>Y 1 2 3 x :-1.---A.�.. Turn . .?AV. :C t{, Set'ke � lcurPrf+a, than � rr Still) I(t Kith lxblr*`r1 bodthtrrw l� 4 (PV h.ltl•..ti Turn volum . ntL.A.-CI:, 0s0' C from Sc Str b') CyPF�DS .Cj L_ ' } b scflIurrtcnilaidly Jlp I ki t .1 Le a1 uh rhan�r:rrttrr��Kl, t: t o�rn�,v�al rn r n v I� 1,450 O P ,:)C:.1;:1 'Ph (fool S t is p 2, `['Lj 5L4.�S`: y an t �•.0. .« _ .. .» r Crlc f'ri,1 19 h, I ' 5' t 1'j� b l l N A t,a � � � 5t� ' q , f� �9. it e c c tf a 4 C - d-�toung valutit �+ l L.r r tu ���t� L p 1' blc J .. Gtak>irtryr�,"h+n�c .�. r . , w 1 tzftt rn *2`� {'' �L• LT vol to ph 1 OI,p+ctt O ,� 4c 5r`nji Ch.n r7c�l�T Crram c-t ti.tit vph Fcj1. 1'[3 E V' `c41,4 Table 4 Volume(h�nhr is c ty in vph Ft will tIi fn,h W4<' I C iJrr `Cibw .:...,.. ,t) ' r) 1 1wJ'`I ;liZZE-"..:N l0l" Iti tia,t rr; I, I, �'l7t,irt.t "rrl S � k l'rft turn tnrlurrxl I Iritr�a cirri 6 Ir It �,wtunr» 4Ji;,it,. l''l'I t';°�N. t 9 h II w1 „ • -«.r,a._.,...,. .,.�,�,...w .,.a.«au,.,__u.,,,..,�.wJna_.u•.:»..w.,».+u,..vu.,w.,.r..,..,,.-..r. amt, f • • G, r c • NILSµY ', HrtM PJ,RTLAND, 0*,- l �L • EXISTING CONDITIONS G 'N C/a1iTF TF'M56 GFEENEUFI ROAD GREENC�URb ROAD CENTER STREET CENTER STREET AVERAGE WEEI;DAY F'M F'EAl• 19G& VOLUME 'ALLOCAT Ora TO LAN EE LANE l.r'1t'J"". TRAFFIC LANE 1 LANE �, F.._ L E A' NORTH 70 G +1 �r 00 t t w , • :. , r EAST 40 nO 70 t t t t t SOUTH i a 460 6 0 � o 0 0 0 a ; ; r WEST 10 5 10 0 • ta r UNSI,ENALI ZE>' TRAFFIC u p FROM LANE 1 LANE ', LANs LANE , aY NORTH RESERVE CAPACITY 6_ LEVEL OF' SERVICE A LoS 4,1 a 6 I,- b M E,' EAST RESERVE CAPACITY 104 IZ k. z AEL OF SE RV I CE L // 4. � 1tA( ' 4 41b(,.— +'4 ) p2� 1� �O' i t SOUTH RESERVE C;PAC I T‘' '1 � + WEST RESERVE CAPACITY 174 . LEVEL OF SERVICE D .. NORTH/SOUTH� MAJOR STREET NORTH M • • I� Cdr r a1.N.+ww,>f• ,u x xx4iu. - ....+....Jb..l,•0.ui1W+-.x=y�..WN>a+..:+.S.ISRkr.. ....4.uJrw.....>.a.h-.F m S PL./11'1.1k.,L...1.1 I v 1 v t, ,..I . 4....'r 1 L,. 11 i I t 1}' ,,..1 I J. `.J 1 ;'4..•_.I t/ \ I 1 ..� 1 a Un,,,I \I ti ' t..J 1_,_-,t .-_.�4 2 �� �: °- a/cuIatiOf Form . '° , 4A,6WwP,Y 9cto) c euc-G ,o Design Hour p° . P .k 1,..'''.' ' tcrsecti�an s.wa .�+h Problem Statement UVTN ? opo�� . ©EVet�et evA"C' ,,. P'r _ Step 9a. Identify Lane Geometry Step 5. Develop Passenger Car Step 8. Calculate 9a. . , • Slop 1. fy es (PC V) in pch ' `'t Approach 3 volumes Lane 42 ____ Approach 3 fi 3 1` LO f AT_ 'tn Adjusted Volumes Volumes ;. • il dc ` r 1ZZS r Total i l�djutted ,la—.V' • - �° d N'"dY Cgq>*1� TH -_.__ r,Sovc- PCV PCV of per r1tF4C 0 LT . mcnt (Stcp7) U W (U*W■PCV) Lxr►cs' Lane ;; • �.- N F- I �" - t T q� r r_,_ „, �' r3I n a. '•' � �7 I�p I 4qa a. a o. ,ta,1 9Z5 z x}63 13G0 2- X80 ,� I ",,3,, 0 3LPProach a • LT -- �_ � rq3$g' 30 Step 2, Identify Hourly Volumes 10 u M dr � i+ IB S t IS AT - - , � B 1FiV) lri vph J ~ .P > . r' LA in � Approaoh 3 ZpS - Approach A' E AT t I > TOF I ...�. _ AT = ,, Volume Adjustment for • p 9�i� 1 T. 1.5/. Step * Ni ltiplucse Sig��rca.( Overlap . TM � tzn� Galculnte Period volumes to Z> (PV) in pch VoiUmc AelUst 1- . ►- LB= a LT = Possible .. a: h -�-� F O;cln I'''robable Critical Carry`o\•cr Critical I ■ L- tV Approach - 3ra ilasc Volumc to rte t Valumc l' •',4 ,2.6 I p7 P Irt prH P�' in Grh M T c ti." ': f � � T. 1. - 2 4, a n H,' TH = l~' ( ) 315-11O(B) IqQ u_ h _ CIS .. �c _ il - ••C 'C ` i ,.w I i �. At B 1 tZG5( 1) 6 .»( c(,,,z.) 12.,G il 5 4,°1 t. r LT two T_ a ho d m a I w ; ;' Ti -a Q b A1kZ 55 (� � AT . to f_.. ' l ',... d � proach 4 -) I- A o � I„ Ste 3 Identr Phasing 5 4? 0,90 o o P 83 5 . . p .�l` � FMF ��____ C1 to ■kl Ai_,-....g3 L1 = (90 r' -'' ct t 1--9-+ 4z r 11 ixrra of C �•� ar 2�». U Jh "' Step 10,"S f ritdcal _,..+ A2•-,-•A4 r 10 ApprodCh d` / Volwrfes ,I a� StejJ 7. T'urrc Adjustnients \ - _. _..�: 11 Step 4. Left Tarn Cheep Appro4lrh 1 11 Step 11 Intersection Level of i` il,pprod4:11 !(brcm.iil Servlcc . • .IaAP jeompxrr Step ItS w11t1 1'abic 61 1: TUt"h Chan itticr�rh�� � �..� �11r11 vb�un�e i r"�E-r W rafn atcr 6) � �»ti C"j ' b: .eft tatii:'i tee-.∎y =�• 1 A C. G.�"w (PV r1")WI1UyIn vrrl In '�.�` '. 4_a". ,. .r. .. I 'n r tt lntcr:l, 'Ph rttirn Step '' S c -S,1: : w .,., ,.7»,...- :,1..,, ..,:: ; :. 1 ,p r v�1 1.ti- ' L t's- t I'ry s.lt^iitHUt �,, xS».ter/,..1 . . -k ccrf lcu /d t e la t tt Ft C LT rr4ym i T 1..�, c: uihclrlt luny .w......»...,--- •-•—•" .» d.C)Ppclsitit rnlultic .»1 T� -\1.fR.W.5 4S' Txble J l in r Ih I 1: lr c ft�t u r-ri L t ',L)110 t'4}4 �» � S t na'1(1-t. „-.,» .» -.�,.-��-...�».,-•-„."`” 1 , t; 'cil ah V,.F.5, tJTI_c, rte 5 rlr rail,, t-'G'l.5i.5l' A , ---... ` o C. f trta br tly iri Kph w i ' Itt w41i 1 i40 p.,r, (�')/titi'te„"lttS» a e » t, l cr1 tat 44rluttw, l I`,I t:-4,',.",E c• \rN.. ¢.:; �Ert KIIr;' " !). q 4#Y , r. i' r. t. . � a4 t h 1r vU1u„ ,.Alµ,• i I ! i j p . ', is a n .y-w .VN.r....e.....w,,.a...4udA1Y:,.•m+ vrV++.:. Ft-I,x.. .:NMr~+.+.uL1U:Lp•.L51".F a1{JL.1'AI:-.w1..« •`4+ .+Ut4 rW'fi+V...FFJ...+n'A . rd /()-'J/ April 22, 1986 To: Tigard City Council Members Re: Site Development Review (SUIT 6-86) ; Variance V 5-86 Dear Sir/Madam: I am a property owner of the above mentioned site and wish . the sale to go through according to our agreement with Gramore. r. My husband served on the take Oswego City Council for 8 ; years and I appreciate your position in trying to do what is 'g Tigard.g you may know, we have owned the site right for �'i ard. As in question for approximately 30 years In your deliberations, please consider the followings 1) Gramore has already accepted the require- ments you have directed. 2) The use of the site is within C-0 zoning. 3) We have lost tenants during the proceedings 4 • at a severe economic loss to our small partnership. The tenants left after your apparent approval upon Gramore 's acceptance of your terms. 4) We are unable to sell the property under any circumstances rcumstances if you don 1-., allow this transaction to be completed under terms set by Tigard that were accepted by Gramore. 5) If you determine that it is still necessary , to turn the transaction downy then wa believe i! we have suffered a de-facto condemnation under t' 1 • eminent domain and Tigard should purchase the ; property. Thank you for your censide rrxtion in this matter. I Yours truly,i I +y r as i Y Laurie Goodell erguson 1061 chandler load W c i.; 7:........ ..........r .... .......Fig -. - , . _ • _ � l r z‘ :; kvZ:ItI-9II_-CtL•`?`,,INING i a 7 ®-_�•/ ? „ ` ���� -F i / c{ az.' �T k�:�I�:t�'.-'.- LINT:4+TIT,� - �- .. IT R � � 4 • -II._E1 s yT i.,,,RI.rlEili�r _ �}C� :: _�b� I @ tt' _....,:t.:-.741',%'-(Z-II At': _tom r�� ji ` 1 , — xK4 a 3 \ i- 'IC}P.F..-1A I -- /.i�.. zrs`, �',,,- i-CX.�GC • - - ^/�+l` '- 7�RVi' - Lam.. (3_,,c.; J\Yi t '--� ',, X.--` RO=i/PE 1` - _ , ''•.ty� € �" txr`a;--t 'ice ..r _ -';�' '1' ° --,..• PA ,\ , _y{� t 6 w'°' - �.._- ..� .- ! -- _ ells. .{•,,.- i� is ' ti-.,.__-,.-- ' �� S . .-�- t _r"- � .r ...loom,// -ice.jai ✓� �c ��b \� - - -__ • _ _ .+ v�.�+„i�`..r+� - l`4, - • t i..` '°�mac° y�:e �?, � ',r t f t v ` - -, /. i-�_ i r>.*� ,•.,,- .'..''-. 'Z. - ,.: �' SS, �tE,,,, : { A s, Ncs . s I ;''':''..."-A -I" .A!‘S. ....-:' •-.1.!-,--=-',,,-- -- - .... .. :c., :A ., _...--. S , ...„v,,A P,. ,, ,,.10 GI le_iv't-X.si i it.., 7 ''�� -- _ '-' , irY r t .:iZ- t•_-_,.1..... l rid'.Z T is ' _i1Lri _ (,_ - I� i r� •-a�- ,�- -- E•• +-r _ _ iI-, r'IT'�S'T�S_- - FAG= USA f.- ._ , �. � a �L t_..,--- ,, -'-'7.-/---et_e --. .1.t.-,1%..---- .-,;':;:.,\T.: , \- ,„. ‘qt‘___-tslu ----„,-1 ,„. idagg_.11J-P"...*....i'x'4%,11,, co,,c.- _ ., ---.-_-:,,,c.--,.._-- ,.;,6-.,-;', P,- - - -- _.--- --,i- _ .:.--. . -J.-..,\--_,-. - Ne■ik\i‘G I ‘A: _,.,,,,'..,LO• - Ili. Isss _,-_____,.______---.-_,....-. . - . , ____.3.:., _- , 1 .1 ,.;,..,..z.-;-:_ _ . e- • --=fit :' ' �s.c o_ x�t P'- s 1..t.`,..‘'-'--.� i.- .o ��.�'r, _ , . � _',1-' :�.- '><� .•.� 1.-�:. a� sue,_ 40 — R� a� _ � .� - • . _ t fi � `. .Ga 2 s c I7• 1'Riil� - \ill: L .•.. ._„ •,� tD.� - - ,, ' 3-= z . q _--- ,-----,_- , , . . . 1. $IBC:`� .• �I25 Oro a g. - �: jai` ;\.a_; ♦I N s - � te R N # -t - W i` L / . a a I _ _ � A, k _ NEW,L'�3IDzD •t _ • •�„ p a k ` on� r.-,./ ;-• - -- ' ; I 5t Z, _-� \( � t `vrAGAR WASH .... v_ _ TSx t, jai _ rF 't= f �_ _ — 0 l'R1P- ://4t> .e, / i-- --- ' -- -- - _-°.' if r--k1NO - ' b2N- _ -- i ' IS 6-3-a---40::,2-a'' $Fs',3 t IF. ►fw6rAls t�le.-- - c.--:.,1' S 62°37G .. T , I _ ___ j z •�— ----k---- - - _ _4, _ ,._-. _ _ a , jpit; t ..MAST + ��_- - -. --• r ar �•rr________. ..-� a — _ . " �J ! il 1 rQ' •. w • pp . ' . ny 9. ' ' ifn RE V I EW.9b,.G R 6-86 VAR 1 4i�CS V 5 r rR S T 1 4Eli31AYE TRUST GYR. PO 1 , #2 1 A request by the City Council to review the Community Development Director's decision to approve with conditions a request to develop a 6900 square foot retail/auto service building and an automotive car wash and a Variance to ; delete a portion of public sidewalk along Center Street and to allow a landscaped area of 13.5% where 15%. is required. The property is zoned C-G (Commercial General) and is located at the northwest corner of Pacific . Highway and Greenburg Road (WCTM 291 2AA lots 1000, 1001, and 1100). a. Public Hearing opened. b. senior planner Keith Lideh synopsized staff report noting modifications to meet staff ' conditions. The original Planking ' Director's decision restricted access onto Greenburg. howeverp the engineering staff has revised the plan to include a right turn only onto I Greenburg Road. c. Ed Sullivan 53 'SW Yamhil l p Portland, questioned' the validity of the Cothc i l R ability to have the item Pulled. from the dnsett agenda. d. Legal Counsel reviewed the procedural issues regarding the Council's interpretation of resolution, Motion, and filing. e. It was consensus of the Council that the hearing proceed. f. Public Testimony: Proponents o Ed Sullivan 53 SW Yamhill, Portland representing the r t �, Applicantp reviewed the site plan. He discussed the traffic circulation' on Greenburg Road, Pacific Highway, and within the I3 development. `. of Gary "Katsion, traffic engineer? Wilsey and Ham 52i SW 11thp { Portland, discussed in detail the two major concerns: trip generation ' p.. intersections y^ plan has ; I and operation at the itltersectrc�ns and driveways, The site lash been develpped c1°sely with staff and 0001.1. 0 Tom Wr i gnt oh, Wrightson Properties, 52O SW Yanh i l l, Pore l and o the proposal. spoke in favor of h P o Thomas Sul l i van r attorney ) 121C 5 SW 72, Tigard; had a prior I : ' have be his concerns v been now sa�t�sfiedll that h c concern about t is ut t��ffi►� u men i �, sere Consulting 5ngineers o Tom Saar I�aus�r civil engineer Da�r . eau o p tnc. r answered tuestiohs regarding the guardrail, • I ' Page V w COUNCIL MINUTES .a. APR l L 28, 1906 , r I I t;yti I, • 1 rA ♦iwl..MI"w.a. d.la..r G i.._. i .iN lan.r ,.1:.,...w.r.i-. .t aWx..n1m ♦..J-.r nn......_..a._.,:ar..+1.n r f i i i r I Q. City I Adminiatr ator requested clarification of the D i r oc t or l decision regarding specific items which have be revised since the Director's approval. I h ' Discussion io n followed on various traffic situations and options for . handling such problems. I .. • of th�i� Council Ed 0ullivin withdrew his objection 's jurisdiction to • it ,j Lion reopeh the public .hearing. . • j. Publlic Hearing Closed. k. Motion by Council Edwards, seconded by Council President Brian to approve proposal striking Planning Director's Cohdition 12 and P adding Condition 22 I ;� I allowing the ingress as shown on the drawing; a g requiring a non-remonstrance agreement for the s;��iewalk ' on Center street and filed with the rec pp by ey° and for naval b Cit.lp At,torn Motion , proved b uhanl mous vote of Council p ie sent. L ' 10r URBAN AREA PLANNING AGREEMENT u t Development ment Director distributed a portion of the agreerent. a. community y p 1 � The entire agreement will be reviewed by the Council at the May 5,• 1986 meeting.g8 rn 1 g .:.,SENT AGENDA: The e items are considered to be routine and may be enacted I . lid N tout separate discussions Anyone may request that an item Ca emotion without i , i n one p ,.�`' be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.c Motion to: 11. 1 Approve Council Minutes - Apd`J1 14, 1 86 11.2 Receive and File a Community Development Land Use Decisions b Monthly Departmental Reports - March, 1986 .. Page D vd/8urnh r�� LID #85-01 $108,713.CG Bill Page ' - 11 � Award Bid Hall �. ; - Const 11.4 Approve Revenue Manual & Fees & Charges Resolution No'' 86-51'. ll,5 Approve Computer Purchases & Authorize Contract Signatures ll.G Approve BLCC License Application w New outlet summit l Restaurant, 12180 8W Scholls Ferry Road, Tigard, RlAppliclation 117 Approve rove Cond tional Acdeptan :e Beaver colt Street fA Sewer Improvements , - Resolution No. 86-51 , . ,i I al. City Administrator presented revisions to 10.4. City. b. Cit Administrator requested 10.3 be amended to inclUde An award of the bid and to appropriate authorilatior`I for the 41400000 FCC ccoritributic.Iti. Administrator added the followitlg Items: I c. City Adrri�n 10.8 TAC/Court Yard Paving 10.9 Medical Coverage - Chief Lehr I I Paqe� 8 - ,OlNC1L MINUTES ARIL x , 1986 4 A • • d. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Johnson to adopt Consent Agenda with 10.4 tabled to May 5 for further review ; 10.3 amended as discussed; and the addition of 10.8 and 10.9. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Count,il' pref�ient. . pP 12. NON-AGENDA and Staff pA Y YEMS� �r ol., 'oun�i l an City Administrator presented status report of the Civic Center move. a. � b. City Ariministrator stated that the State will be overlaying Highway Y ' • 99W from the County line at 65th Avenu e to Highway wa Y 217. They have ' opened bids and the work will occur sometime this summer. 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION -• deferred until May 5, 1986. 14. ADJOURNMENT: 11:45 p.m. Rey o d er • r Ot em of Tigard } ATTEST .-, City o "Ti.gard� I , • I , . I I a I I I � II . .r I I I i F'4 c'e, 9 - CDUNC t lr M T �J�E y.. N�'F"l�, 2B 1,98(;:, M I ..•' as. r ,.4..+, ,a au ..��.r.. t,.a,,»..-. ., _ ,u,a. , «I�.....»...J.... «.�.»,..—...s.«.. F� .. • CITY OF TIGARD ORCC+DN KKK' COUNCIL. AGE ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: 4/24/86 PREVIOUS AC TM I : Planni nt irector - 4 SDR 686/ Approval 3/14/86 -- ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE. .--M----- � V 5-86 First Interstate Trust PREPARED BY: Keith Liden • REQUESTED,BY: ADMINISTRATOR: 1 ' DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: C�'L/r �~ • CITY ADMINIST -----.-` POLICY ISSUE, 1. Should the Director's decision for a highway oriented use at the corner of %. . Greenburg Road and Pacific Highway be affirmed by the City Council. INFORMATION SUMMARY On March 14, 1986, the Planning Director approved an application for a Commercial Center on the corner of- Greenhurg Road and Pacific Highway subject to conditions. ¢M On March 24 , 1986, the Council called this item up for review and re-affirmed its position on April 14, 1986. A hearing is scheduled fry; April 28, 1986.. Attached are copies of the Director's Decision, the applicant's original narrative., a traffic • sturdy by Wilsey and Etam, a revised set of plans which are intended to address the . '1 conditions of approval noted in the Director's Decision, and a memo regarding a prior approval for the property, CU 4-82 for. Jim Settiemire. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED • ' � Decision incorporating the conditions imposed by the stalk. p Director's 1 . Uphold the C��.rec to conditions,'' 2. Apt�rovc the request with modifications to tia�. coy �. i 3. Deny the request by overturning the 1G Director' Decision. • m � z=z SUGGESTtO ACTION Review, the`;pertitout iuf'urmut.ion and uphold� the tfiroctnr.s Decision or mudt1'y the \I approval . • • ro • /s6,' w .,•,_,m;a w•. Fw YI: t 1� h.,��.,�., .� STATE OF OREGON INTEROFFICE MEMO ■ TO: DOT4D TO THE F LE DATE April 24, 1986 - FROM: Leonal H. Gunderson Asst District Maintenance Supervisor •, SUBJECT: Gramore, Inc. Development 99W (Pacific Hwy. ) at SW Greenburg Road ,. City of Tigard This memorandum summarizes the series of events which led to the issuance of the access permit for the subject development. The civil engineer, Tom Barghausen met with me to discuss concerns of the site related to traffic 99W/Greenburg Rd. intersection. The of _Hi Highway g circulation and operations axon s g Y major issues✓were the allowances of left turns from Pacific Hwy. onto the site, provision of a channelization island to protect the traffic signal p pole r intersection and capacity .. the northwest corner of the Greenburg a.nt p span oleatth. 5 analysis of the ,intersection. As requested, the developer submitted a Traffic ImPaact Report which-met the requirements for Proposed developments along state highway facilities. The . report was reviewed by our Traffic Engineer and had the following concerns . with the submitted Fite plan design: y turns from the site onto Pacific Huy- " 1. Ability to � lanetfr � Center St. exit." 2 No clear sight om the ent g -n in driveway on Greenburg Rd. 3. Design of the right tuz only Y A meeting was held on March 28, plan modifications to 1986 carcwashsoperators,err�od.ivilaand traffic "• • • solve our concerns. The developer, Tigard staff PeF engineering cons .tan- , ' y g and our staff were in attendance. • Through discussion and concensus of the participants, the Pacific Hwy. driveway was modified to restrict left turns from the site onto Pacific Highway by the adding of a raised concrete channelization island. The design of the island does allow left turn movements form Pacific Highway into the site. The allow- , y left turn move- arice for these left turn movements at the drivewa eliminates l menst at both the Hwy. 99W/Greenburg and the Greenburg/Center intersections. The existing left turn storage bay and taper area is large enough to provide . g Yl t refuge for movements into the site. the left turn movement out of the site at the Pacific With the elimination of � . Highway dt.vewa it becomes motorists wanting to go eastbound H g y comes essential that motori g y ware of the . The developer agreed on Pacific install Highway are aware signs Center ttof the car wash to direct , to placer install and maintain gri , Street exit Maintenance of the directional ' traffic' to the Center 5tre Maintenance signs a.s critical to the safe operations at the site driveways. ' The Greenburg Road right turn in only driveway is desired. It would relieve � ` is r x 4 d.ri�r ... the Pacific Hi,hvsa intersection of some vehicles. into e 5itet be des gn . to di .� The drive- , turns from Greerbur��RoadHanto�th it mud to discourage illegal left tur 9' way design was,modified by increasing the skew angle and radius of the approach .f, di,i 2h47 Bey ` ... r A r ; v r • aw.-. ,... ,...rr,.:,.. ,..x:_ ... r _.,a.-.r.r, .,:.....r:.-...r uc-,l,.l...r w. .. . .w:,:,ww.,..a-,,..+.♦.-..u..--.wi....::. rrt,.r m.,.:,n.:.:uw:.... ..-.:,-I+++.ar....,.J.. .uKawro+,w..,- y..acr.:w..aJ+.er..uiir.«r'i♦ '/ • Page Two MEMO TO THE FILE curb, moving the sidewalk back frcan the curb to allow for low landscaping to block the opening from sight of the northbound Greenburg motorists. The site plans were modified according to the concensus of the meeting and submitted for review to my office. The revised site plans met with our approval and the Pacific Highway access Permit for the development was issued on April 14, 1986. LHG,js cc: Citof Tigard . • City of Tigard City Council -- to the record for Public Hearing for Gramore Dev. Wilsey and Ham • • , I I , 0 r I . I I I r i I , iliM1 {I ......:. .....,, rr...... .... •fir • t ° I I: w.u4 ....w..-mL.... ....l.Jl•n...lk.. w.S.u.N.M. al.. .IF...N 4.. •.JF11.w»,=.{uW{..awl.i.N.+Arml+wn.4w... .+-0. ...-!#1..«sr ww:.1..--.. ....1.< w1.L•i.+.4.0.L..t+,.:T«-. nW1'#-k..:wLYw.uF"GF--4...._..,.Ni'4-i-+Y+JA..x.N.«fw. ..r.AIJ,-U citi)--411g ) April 22, 1986 To: Tigard City Council Member Re: Site Development Revs '` i, �,. '3 �''d ' u,.• r ante V 5-86 Dear Sir/Madam:. I am a property owner of the above mentioned site and wish ' the sale to go through according to our agreement with Gramore. . My husband served on the Lake Oswego City Council for 8 years and T appreciate your position in trying to do what is You right for Tigard. As ma y know, we have owned the site. in question for approximately 30 years In your deliberations, please consider the following: 1) Gramore has already accepted the require- , ments you have directed° s within C-G z s within zoning. 2) The use of the site a 3) We have lost tenants during the proceedings at a severe economic loss to our small; . ''', partnership. The tenants left after your • apparent approval upon Gramore's acceptance of your terms. 4) We are unable to sell the property under any circumstances � you �. normal �czrc`urnstancos �f ou don t allow this transaction to be completed under terms set ip by Tigard that were accepted by Gramore, 5) If you determine that it is still necessar to turn the transaction down, then we believe we have suffered a de-facto condemnation m na ,,� eminent domain and Tigard should,� taon under property '� � purchase the Thank you for your consideration in this matter Yours truly~ ti Laurie Goodell; ergusoft 1061 Chandler Road . ° Lake sw OR k e � g r 97034 I lgE/ , • n I I • I"trl't'ic:1r°r by c';;c:18..icy by c;ruryc 'r.or Edwards uphold he Piartrli,ri .,omlti.ssiorr decision to approve(. th modifications as discus,> 'ac lay Counc:.c.1.1 arid d'ir c, ct s'l:a•f'f to pr'cp61.r•c a f' rral order fear' adoption C rt 5/5,/86 subject to l'.i,t:y Errrjz ricer' s f i.ri i apprc)u&1 of �f a r7�Irarad Larle rows i.cyr"r i.'t ion r,if a 404 perch is r• t.ui,rr rtF�r7� . ' Appr•ovcd by cat 3- O. 2, rnaj�ari,ty vt)�l,,r r,1�i h:cartr7rwa.'i. pr°ca(r t, t",raurtr'i 1,car`s acic,r� �:tr'id `c l rlsrar r7 s'twti r'I'r t"it citrra tQ) not h)(.,,t .rty with for nrcar j beUea,cope.t , Rick Caf• e1.1 of 1.i;r'7cc I rr Savi.ri s arid Loan, rioted 'for' the . record (:)f th'tc' f'lrral c,r-der h, 198(5 wr)ul,d be pc r•nti.ssi.b1.e .i: thto 120 day r'equti.r4emcrl't or not 'H y �l p $T �NT ' r rRUSI" �y y {� 'HEAR NO,"'"t'�x.��i 17 �� �'4� ,S,RK1h71 M � tom. �� W7`�'��V [�` (W�/�F,�y9Uy; y ,y.. :.,.:,,�� k,�.j, a ;��, 'h� i .1�' �1'�, N l �..V;,Ce) Irn �'i A... r•ct �� s h,' lay r f:Iic:. .c,��. . .f "I.,a.? r ,r`c.'l ,:;1.,x'1��. I.,r���,.1�v• t. i.c,ar c.w tI�4. n u.M i�cvc'lc:►r�mcartl l�°ir•cctsar' s appr•:va'l w1.1.:1't i,csris to do ury1rayp ;a 61,100 sq. ft. retail/auto service building and an automatic car wash and a M udtr"i.�u'tc.c+ f'or' dca'lw�`k:a.c').i°t caf a rzcar•l,'r,car� r)1 l')►Ntl;t'l'lc� s'ld(r rat'llc < 'i.crrt t:lcrlt<c r• r� to f" 1. c'Is ;)E:'!C;1 'r(:iiit c f 1'1 ,r% whtcr'of ;1,IJ% is nc�Gtta I" tCI r't:?41�t arid. 'La �t1.1.�w a err„>c.c:tl �. I p.)rrr:)perar*l;y is 4(:)r'1(.1.!d C;...,t;) t)t,1i'I i ca`c;t;t't',cad ate: tF10 rrror't1.'rw0st co r of • N��ca.F .c' h�11,c hrw t 1 and (3r'(..;err1 bt,rr'c Road (WC1''1'/1 1 ;1, Zt'iA, 1Mr)ts 1,r,1OO, 3,0(;)1., ah�i�l a. Ur,)rnrn trr 'Ly Dekie1.ri};)n1_rrt [)i.rcr:for stated 't;l'tc to i,r'tfrar'rnoit:i.ra1'1 to the City Council alori with Mx r•F'� tar s�t fcar• Council, to tenors(: their •c4ci,si.ort 'tra r'cauhw this app1',I.cata.on1. f'I {st'l.sc1 rro'tcri rr)r• k;he tl.rstt F'tad appcbtr<<w not t sttr't^cLlrtd1,1.1g 't:h13,s ht�!�r�l.rtrry k��t�t' ►'tral :r.rtc�as w��rwc rta't, ritaa.l,caci u } r•rar�r r�ty rawnJet'sS 1'1(? stiacea'l;coci Glut Co1,,trid.1, crarytiriuc? tra . he ptahy'a,a,r' i5 frEwarl rtr.� to 4/28/86 to a;l.7.r�ut r7r,,'1.�r �.;, to be rtlax.1.eci '”, decided to not review k:hr derision 3 i.r �°r b Lcga'i. l�nttrls �, stat'trxd his 'fi.rm 1.1as r :pros&&rttcd ( r.6ulrrart•, t1.1c • pppii:cslnt, 10 anoth(ir City, but that business would have no impact on this c 1..ot11 Flan ht vus I1, tata;).!'i 7.9O't:h1 St n° �("'t,' lac rt't. Was hil'Igtor'i 9 182., t k l:r:,d I"rx Itilrit�5" a it'cny,,i.,st; �trrid rrI''I i.rrrar;!t�' rl 1,;1"It sl.kotl,(:" or Or . lie pt,11;)1lc (.;li.cl c, I)Jr, ' drat>Isi ion o'f Gt kr4i1; O1'D()"1" I'l(ad t i p.)(a r,'rtt'lssion For (.1(1).v cal, c,t•ir°) cuts In 1:1"1i,s '' Gtr'cika 611'1(1 no cn Li 114,1)(.,1".1.d hay iii,p rat�r tiro:r ...App41;ie,:Kaun'11.• to dnl :ty tca 4/213/ it hrr.".()1.r"11.19 duo to 1)t�1r�r:Fr�i;yc opt:100.':$ on LI'Io land in question,sti.orr, Nk r or:lunstod Cu tarlr. i:1 mtatko a ntca't.'ikar7 l:cr rrrr to ritri, �rxr, d. I lr', }16ir r'y� L .11'i, (1r�ari�tc.�t'cw r char uson l cart ;i.vu w .1.O;lt)(.) ' iJ t.lr�oc:rrbtrr 9 11/4 o#4.(:1, M ��t" tl k-+ra tl�ir+y 'I„► ri „, ,L �s`f`i.rlri i.Frr t:l i t.y ri r „ar d t_i (,)t ().T 1mi 1 rt..) J.ra1'1 I or thrc:r cactvu I r)p=arltc ri t F,lc;, 1.' t:r'u i I. tl'tr,a s l; lf'1"' s study a'ri1 l:urmi ri��(l.n r nu i ttw Of thrsu duo f�a ic1r1 7°, f a, by t.tk):I,:1.r;� LIc�r i a t r'i r°��r! ()I;)s r s i.,ry ti. ',l It1 I 11 r I�� L t� r..., �. .....��. �,u,'ww��.+raw, � ivi�n h.e i��.ni, ....:..,.. �,�.i �......� .�., ....... ...... . ..,. ,. .n.... • • h t .r After br'i.e..f'. Council, cli•SCUsaion, Ccaullc: .i.or,_' Edwar`cls Inravt?d to • . t c�ont:irluty ,t( w p•ta'11,c I•1t..Iar"'1.•ty to 4/28/86. ( it:)' •.1ar1 soc»r•11'.1thht by , count l for 'J'Goh i'1s ot'1, A UI.1a`lrl'lit`ir,,�X.is vt,i•t, , t9'f' present Council presen �I;)r'cavt�d lay • 12.. 1OOTH/INEZ SEWER LID REPORT PI.1f13E. I. • 1.l iii er•,: Bob Wr iyh•1L co•(' l'•A Wr«icihtt; E•r1gi.f(Cyr Lriy, I r`c.!st?1°1•(t d a, hru ��'L � � •:I••t�:J ltiN'rx`L i.rnirl tt"y t r•ty l,rrt�,itar ' s r"i pUr"t; artci r•csc;ottuncar•rc�eti Crit„tr1t:.:t'1:, call firer" a public hear'irlg« •, b RE.SOLU'1`I011l rtiu, 8644 F1 RESOLUTION l`��.c: LF�k7IIllt� THE EIV'1''E1‘1*1 TO FORt�'I A "`» 1, `��1NC"1"t�R ., Wk.H� r.:,OC(lt.. Ll`'tI�)ROVt Mk:�.�i11"r ra:18.1•1'2l.,i.;I T() CON$TR JRr.,!" IMPROVEMENTS IN '7°EIE. AREA OF 100TH AND ;1NE Z AND TO HOLD A PUBLIC • HEARING ( OUp'T'`Eit:� 'TI•I I)I2F•EI,iNI1':NARY ta111t INNN1 El-Z:t1t, E21:1(R"" t'\NI) DIRECT,CNt „C tai' TIIII• E'il::• R:I:I\IG ril:” c[v :N, <t i �y Cta1..0"I1.,:.1'1 tar Ed,.),l6tr«t i s '1;to t., Motion Say t"t:ar,1'1t,•.•i,'S.orr� l r'i.;rl't, >tat:ortti 1.J ap;)rar cav(Y, • Ap(:)1.'Uved lay t•t1•1ut1.1irnca1.,ts vc)t.tx Of CoLtt••Icii1, {at•••e.st:11.1t,, 1.3 , CHERRY STREET SEWER LID REPORT •- PI-1A81,„ T ' N r o'e r't: E"I�Tru e1.° 3••b Wr„1g1°IL of Rcl Wr'ir ••L LI19j ir•tetar"Trig E�rr.t:•.so.rl•tt d rtl I� ��r�twl��n1 .1.1�r•y �r1c�). it tr''� s ►••war�r' a.1.•ttl r„at-..• rntutal•tclt,.c.:i C�talr,rl'1c:•1,i (::i11 for of 1J u Ia],a,c. I I E ca r~a.l•1 g •. '-, 13t,•-41.3 A RI ;,OL..LJ'I";1;()IM DIICI„rAARINC 1"1-1 I"' X 11!1 I"N 1 TO FORM 1.i b s RLtJi..iJ"I':Cc�Ill NO, �° �;c�N.l..l"r�RY ��I,'►nIEI3 1..00AL Ii; IPROVE•("1H:,4111 1)18 1'EtLt:�'I"' '1"(1.,) C",C N$3'I'Rtat:ar' ., „ 741.,11..1 AM,) Cl•Il RRY A111iL) TO HOLD A x�'117Rt,')VL:;f1�111'1�,� IN 1 Eil;, tiltl„r , -� REPORT AND , PUBLIC"t a .•, :) 1'N11.i11 PI'2Y ENC;; NE 9ER,1«I11G DIRECTING �«,� HEARING' BE GIVEN. l':,"i,..z.IVI� THAT NOTICE' OF THE E Jr Count ' (;, `h;)1;irJt•'t by C,c�i,it°tl; x ,tat. �]'th�lr l s1,,,1, � 1.t°talttic t;l by l, r L•x:tcilra r t to ar.)l7r r.�v(.1. ► irrlt � I • r .� t , .1 1 �t � I rta K • II 14, CIVIL Ii\.IFRACTIONS 0RDIN(ANCE "`r GI.11•L LJ0tl(,'1,ra1,1t. L1II"tOt:Lx.1ra :i1/t'tr:alavva.rrt'd;{ Lhhi,• It story or LI•t(1 t;i.kti1 � i k1t, t..i,111►I1 ► y l'3111(:1 , a tJ 11.(� �{, I',�rt 1 ' t.c)tr�o I,I7r t ,„tc.t ton w. • ., c�.,'t. »„ r �c �. A'tti'1:t„t I ire I,i.1 Nth �,I t�'t H ,�►1Fr�ut l t )its a► ;I' �� t, 'I•Ic• Muhl l.1 r, I{a�•t I t:C►o1,1r•I. )•t,tt:lc 1.„t wa,:11. c;1(•LCD �;tt;o •LI•ttl �' � �i"I tt l I '�G r 1 111;1,1•I kat 1:1 r t;!t� •I ��: 11.~I ).L;' to a hlo..1.r I rtr,J sl c;,f I i':t1r 1 ltt,sari,r1�� �ualr � y ” b oR1:)I111f`1 I(*'L NO, 86• 20 AN URI)].irir11111':,I. 1'1Mf:NI'J�1.III( ,..),04 . 1,80 ANI.J RE I,)LAL•,:1,NU E Ei=t I;ON I5,04 190 (1ND t"11•It'i1•1 I'1.R 7,40, ISL E• LINIIitlta N1,1'CSANt L IA M)) LV;CL , l �. l�h{11fTh..7'.C,�:.� 1 Sri «, -t, f . 114c,.y ,.,l.,U ?�:111E"'r+',I�U"1"S,t7111tj lak•t;)l;,L'{){JRL:..r4, c�lul•II E.,.�1 r�1E)I.r..� Iz " by t,•c111.1+ S .Lrar t t;It,.a1.cis t o otr�rals•t:. r�. ht1r,11;;ira►"t by t,r4)iar•tr;I ,crr 1:3r"i_tart, ,t•r.ryrlr,lrti b„/ t . ttApr)1'.1..t11e.t by ul°lull•I allttrt.t., vol► C; of t.;cat.n.lt..1 '1 ptrt,ost:irlrt , ' t• to r. 1`Jiltt,k n1t.)ci,11 ic;,ott1,.+1'1- t a >ra : ;' bt'°x.1.'1 � a � I;1.) 1•t,{t1f�,. �I f i �, rj�f I,atat�Ir1�A 1, wul.� .�tf �tii",�11!�t„1.►'�t J t .r i �Lhtct� wtiit.,ci I•tt:r;i rijh1 L o f, I.0” riot l,t'tc1 t.{•1,,tt I•I'tt• I'�i I,v r.lI°"tt't1.twK , :> 4x.1u l,Cil bt• in ” ” v it t),I:da t..i.ca►t or L k11.'s ,c c.,,t 1.o-ail, I.)tic,)Co ti C y1J111(::,`1I;. MI NI)I'E:',t •1{)1 II I'I, 1i4)1t 1 •.:'�.. .-...«,r.. ...yaw- ..,�,:...,.a..a wu,.,,.,.w...r-a-..a-n........�..� w+..:«.-w.:�w..a..;,ha�«.�...nr♦h.rti ,ww+...w •' . ,:., a.w w....,. ..,:,:,.., LOCAL IMPROVEMENT ,f'',ODE REVISION �.. . ti �" ., was r` carttrtc�r1c� trt ctFa.tt a, Leg 1. eoca•isci; • stated l:ht1,.� r4..v:1,81.01..1 Fur t:t:7tar th7c� m a.i rlg r c qu'.r`c•?mc�r7t,s f(:) • 1cOCal. assessttle(nts ,. b, oF7G)I:I1(A111C,,E: 1\10. 86—Z1 AN 0131.),I I ftillc";I FAM1••,::1\1UThG ORC)IlNA1\10E 85-.'4c7 Ky wl'f f t::l l'1 t J:11c 10 LOCAL IM PlZ(,)UI'.Mf",N1 1, 1 , r�, Legal, COLtrtsc•l r`c c.:r.,tttrnc rtclhcl ir'tg S c•1"...1,ot(1 ZA by adding 't1.)e 1 . fo11ctw;ir`tg to the it sentence: • ' aICI( J.'t�,rarts to tFy .r'tFrar�ma'ti,or in c1:;,r.,rt 13 31•', , "arid make, 1(lecess�try ' 'the l =n rtc�(ctr~' $ d I(.)y 1;rattrt a."l.rar° ;�`rah'tr7srar7, sttc•.r•)fld(tc Icy C1raUi..1c r r' I3r'i a.r.1 to adopt , wl,th amendment its outlined by Legal Counsel, Apprr:ed by uncar'ta.rnou<, vote of Council present, • 'ic':, COUNTY ROAD 3URISDICTION ACCEPTANCE DISGUS8ION t)cyWC�l.c� rnr r t� t):I,r(e!c�t c�r� rtc�1. �c :J c.tt �.,>cla.r La.rar� a,s r7t edctcl 'From ' � at� trr�al'nl'llurl a.'l.y Z3 t,"t:,c�u"�s w i.t:h in thc's C L y i,�xtn i t s o hr:1u1"f'l:y 'For �.. r"ec;rartmt ►1tcaQd 2.2 r c bcis- I:7 ;1.1.) 1• so1ution with tour^I°t .rtt Road being requested d u;twtt <a sc•.!rautr{at t resolution. , t atf expressed concerti about the conditions wh1,clt the County might attach to the transfer of jurisdiction for Durham Road . 4 la. 91,51, F�at�r7t.i r��t:>i,d trtt, x�yr ;� ,ENc ctartc trr� 1.1 t6•G , • l;I,•►c,t,� �ar4a rs`t1'rtclr' lr.�c �tl, t"(rac:tc:14 i.r� tltc� Cit:j ftor' wh�i.r�'ky j ur .sc ir.t.:t.rart should b reque s c d ; • C. eiLy Administrator stated staff would study the issue and bring other requests to Council in 1,.:h: near fu'tUr e, "c l 7`'',0111 N:) t„w4 6 Ft l;,,801,.a1.1'i tOl\l F�I..t";c.)k l)1.1111� 1 F'l l'w 1)t.;t.F7 iw OF I'F•IN„ Cl 1 Y d , I�E,.,��"a x t � �...,. ' ROADS, OR OF TIGAW1) TO c cQU,L Rl jutusp C"(":1 oN Or CERTAIN T'AIN COUNTY , • a . PAR'1''1-w If•11:::I�(::c (', WI I I°I►:It! 1"1••II c,',,1.1"Y OI a ,i•.1:,•'101WW:a NOW UNI,)Fr♦h �IUI ,Z: 11)IC'i'":ION OF 'WASHINGTON COUN` Y, t:)1 1:"Clt N, • e, Motion by Cot7c.. Jcr Johnson, seconded by Councilor lrian to adopt • y urtt.,r� t o�trr'I 41,11 t h ta.ra c3 s to 'thir� c:1�;t.sky � q,tl.•'thr tl~t� note •tt`t�tt, fl'trw trr�tt'ti:. .r, or' thtco Ci.Lty would roof. �t,�ti ' )ur 9 e>c .r c.t�,i,rort �0r arty rra.►rds , Y r 1 by t.t t ett`t vot 0i� 11, prs 131'"801.,.0 i ON NO, f3G t HI':1;tJI,U l t()111 IRI;.t,C()lyiti NC 1111 Uk.1,3I RI.' Of 111E L Or t• )7{ I) I.;c. 1•,rii.1 J R1:. J 111 :f:.`1):t C1 l ul\l OF c;C.R'1'A 1:,111 COUNTY ROADS, OR , I A RI I"1.11 i,1;;.O t W I i FH1;t:N 1"1,-(11': �n ;� � t',1 l l l Y 01' 'I',I,ty t1'1F7 l) NOW 1,11\11)f:13 J`1J F'�1.L.a 1, S'c,k IrJA8F,I',t;111(. f°C)11N c,,t:) 1111'l'Y, . g, Motion by w t .r I c t F r i.a , , ' r rc Coon( I l wt Johnson Lo adopt, (s 'w r't v o'trt! ix"f f,;t;Jt.,llli h iur'!sirlt. ' `"l l'ltl t, F��71ai ►;r�rc:.�� i:�y t.tr7��t �, �» 1 , i l IN11.1It f'f1x17.1I 1.4 '1(41f r1 0. I e • j' ,_,... . . I'st1',t,:,t�.sS; 9 .c4i.) f)NI I( ( . L • I7:i:C0111UE:,N,' ; 9:57 PM ) 1,�. COMMUNITY pErE1O�Pk..uT ��p� F�Vr� cc:)111V C,I1. :i1r11:1,1.ATEI: 1 at Community D ays: 'l.oPrtleI"tt Director ''f t,(at art Coun(.11 had su9Yested s l . .f:.F review the length of Lime for appeals to be riled on l.aricl use . issues. Lengthy discussion f o1'icw d regarding t(e 10 day appeal period currently in the code and how L" at effects r tle L1 ay limit placed on ail iartd use decisions . • b. », .i was to rlc, •L change the appeal ti,rit : 1.:1,1'l(. but to r. t� 'lG,.�, was h;:1-tv r) a'L i f'f 'l,(,)(:)k at r,rt;t'ler a r'.e.i`t,s (:)'r 't.11c c;,,c;)ttlp p'latt'l to 'tr'(.xtam i i rle 't:he Process, 1.3. CCaSEN'i AGENDA i `hEya a.'t +' t r.('+ f':C11'1;i1,d4:r().d 1() hct r•(aut"1.r1e arld flay be .. r. "�,: .i�.: (�r,)rtt,4 ti lay I"'.(�t 1»t�a.�?'�'� '.+ l 'lr q '+� s Li s i � s a i..� " J tt t, t �.t Fa r tat rw Led '1.1.1 t,)t t w++ nlr,)t,c rs t t t,♦)i,twit»►�t L a C i 1:c n1 L)e r rtlr tl 1(.1 I:),y tl+()t .1,01'.1 '1'r♦')I'' d i sct.t s 1.(,)1•1 al.Id s l:)c 1''.attl i c''t,;Lon. r �1'l a1't: u'l l'( ' • Mo.t:iorl t(..); 18 ,1, AAppr'raue Coul'7c:a.1 tali ltULti, Matr.c!'1 2.0 & ',?,.4, 1986, 18 ,2 rrp:)p►'°ou(� Ci•ty Adrn•irl',i•s'tr aatc,)r Au tl"trar�i'ty For• ,st.)► D..4.sc�r"i.p•t•irorl t�pr.)t"►;�tt'6r1J, r _.. I:eSQ11,1ta,carl NC) BtJ �r'Id �nl1a.I.t�Illclrl`tat�ti,ion � • 4 18,3 Receive and File', , a, . 1;r•illlmUrla.'ty L'ieu(?),(Jpnlc11.1.1; L�i(rlc1 `Used I)Clc:itiion 13, Crjunc:z:l. Lale 'td:tr' Update• I , r w 1 'L t N1 ! U ')(�is C.. 1 i , c� 'T'�rl't:u�•l:a.ue l ��.c.tldat.� .w� t�ta��, w � � / 'ti Apprro ve 13()atr'‘.:1 ar1d 1:rcatnitn.1.•t'l a ANap() .rttnnc•arl't;: ; < .�," �' $ 1...;r�rtiril i.L t; +c A p ar,)1;r I t. Res s, # • al,, (��)p r ca u�t U•f�;t.1,a.t,J.c:,,i � I�1 trll'l c�l t:l.a 4»� I ':. 8 ::w3�4 Approve Budget Committee Appointment Resolution # 8 42 18 .5 Approve Dartmouth C iii i I tL:tcatr' s Contract & Au t11(:ri ze Signatures •Part 1 That Portion Work l r la1 i l Of I»:7;t) • ' �r t 1 That Portion Or Work Falling Outside 1llat, OF LID 10 ,6 Approve Addition Of Liability Rider, 1O � att 's Inuuranoo For . ' t,;;w'utsli,n' T'iyWtt'''d 'r 6 1.0 ,7 Alai;pr'x�ve' `'a.grmmi1a,zetr'1.lr,il'l As.1t'cN+cwt11cw1tL l'...or IIe11.i,1,/1 (::l.)(*.,r la.l,tl Vli,.'.l'.t (,)1:)1.)T & Authorize l r a t�u r e t 1c)l 1t L t a rr No, 3 '•'a * 1k ,8 Declare Library ,t pI� :/ 3 cf � >c at e talApprove Disposal 'r 1,'t 01,... r:tt'1i,i"d.1..l;c,)rt R(,..!s c.)h i t t',i.ru t»t Nci t16...3 t . " 18 r) Api;)►,.r.:cve `1"r(:t;i.r'tL1'1�l 1 (+(41..14'.,sLb "A" I Eilv(i+a. .I'rl p:lr�.Lca1''r:, 1:)t,t1.1.1.1a.rtrA I;)av) ,,�i(,)1..1 8rad Nra�!a't $100 . u ♦ M ; t1csln 1 ids wh.Y 100 b R1..:i r,)I dc?r , ( . . . . ,ieri tn1i1 si�)rl $:3 HI's '' 18 10 A c :).L Street. Ow-iir,.,at 1(art 6, I)t,1'rrt;;i.rrurtt. ` taut tilts,.)1.:+r 1;otw("nl(1"IL L)1.ck K6'6°.1' t"�•'ci c:� 71at,t t'4� d";taut►, xt .�,�r ,3, SW 18 ,'11. Accept taomp'1i.atr'tc�c Agreement Davidson Stortll Wr :1,rlut P1ar.:ra 1.8 1.2 A1,-.)I;)rrutrut ICrridi-L1.r;,,l°td1 AcI„opLi!trlc:(+ r1r 1),,t,srl.ds01'1 I:.,'lurlu t) wt:+r• & Au..bl1rarl4(11 v Of c.tt:t t7 ltat 1r)Il N(..) 86-37, I ) � �� l�1.x�.(fat�i e ��t�,a(,�t)� �t� 1,) .... ,.. i a1r't�"t t: . 1 ' • 18 '1,°3 floc"u�)t I:ai»ii;)d�1,ir1.t;.1,s�tii 1`.;C)II1p1'l.J.=:u''r;uu rtl1, c.1(ilii(,111. ■rw i'r,.)ju�t,l. tlr)r,c;l tor-rta,ri(°) 1..11,1♦l, ffII 1 �.il,tl;as1 Res.#.86#" t3 E r •tae 1 (1, c.u,)La>u"Ic e 0 f' Bond 1.)+-ar.1a I I 1.£1 � Approve 7 . i )1 03 lb (1t�1;)t'•r.ivci: t°;r,1t'lr,:l w.L i,rii`lal1 A(,,i.c+pt,,titrit u (if Bond fP t,r°k 1','I I Jt.tl'icl lr�s.//'81.1-_ 18 ' 16 A" )r'rovt;t At:ccul;)`t.s:tvic°(c of 13e 1 I.u)ca(:rc'1 I.1 1 )ul)d;11i:1”.l C)rl & I (•t,h;ac(t Of Bond p 1• . ' tr�sc;tl tt't•,i'U1 1‘1(,), 8t Ac„ i 1')►:tt?j t 9 (;)U 111 r";.[.1: IM',I\I t11 H,ri API,"11 14 I.I.)ti I I� . I , , I p ,...: n. �,^I.;:.ate. ,..:...,.w„. '...,.,. ..:. .,',,,._. .. ... :.. ..:.... .... „..... ,. .... r I..i.. ... ,.... .., .. .... f.e . . ,+.P .l f Y • '18.17 ij r P Seth(;i.I u 1,51or•t t:;t:ot►ip 1',1,-,.,Get.). C�y4•'��e,t'tc,1.1, & . ►arr t pN `t.,v ,C, � ,t ia ui.sa,urti Arid At �'hcirize sigrtatur', ':: •18.10 Approve AG :I;nsur••ar►ce Rides . A 19 19 Approve qiyn placement For 'Landscape Maintenance Of Oregon. At Liberty Park , 1E ,20 Accept Non-Remonstrance Agreement Kru c . Corp,rtrsal • meadows #2 ,Subdivision 18 21 Approve Chief of Police Employment Agreement Resolution N ) - 8 '' requested that Director' s Decision FOR 0-06 be added to the . consent agenda for receive and file, 1 b, Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to • . approve the consent agenda S)R 8-86 being added and :, pulling item 0,16 to be considered at the 4/21/86 meeting,. • Approved by unanimous vote of Council present, , , COUNCIL M ,E I•:tNc RECESSED; 10:15 Pfti't pW.rCU V{{.y� j S'�"ON The l,.i.gar�d City council went into Executive ) . �N r ��Le1W�./��Y W1 4'li��MJ+A.b1V, r Session rare ►Aridr the prou l s c.,r► or ORS 192,660 (1)(d) labor relations and current/pendi•n�g 11•irtigation issues at 10:20 PM. MAYOR COOK LEFT AT 10:58 PM , 20. 0 q +f N a 11:12 PM ,. q , ,,) 1 t Deputy City Recorder city of Tigard • I 1 . y ,it y , Mayor city_ of Tigard gar d LW/8846A i • Page 9 Ct;3t)111E; L M.t'11111I IL I.; t,il,)Ri I, •f/1 1 )8Ga • ',, o•� .tµlw -.s.F'nJJ.,Llw.a,..r+l'_,:1. wrk.:w..-w7,.. r...lw u.L...-€-Iw. «.—...- :i14.....l,kh«.... ♦ r.-.-.—..iiH..u.i+.;..+J.—:.44%JF..lix.nw4.wuw u..w.:4-:.4.rJ-+.+.Jr.Q'ii....r- • • .w CITY OI 'T CARD, .OREGON •• COUNCIL ITEM SUP:1MARY AGENCA OF: 4/14/96 AGENDA I "EM (f I O DATE SUBMt'1' 'ED _ /86 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TrTLE �`','r;t `D � * .., ,..,....Diretor approval 3/14/86 V 5 86` '.P•a+i^ ,PREPARED SY __ REQUESTED BY: a, • F DEPARTMENT EAD Ok GITY ADMtNIS1"RATOR: N POLICY ISSUE .._ f INFORMATION .SUMMARY for approved SDR 6-,86/V 5 -86 Subject to Or March 14, , � , .. z conditions, Or'� March, 24, 186, 'the; C+ unci ca1� d phis item up far review, .and 186 the Planning Dtrec scheduled a hear.a.ng, date for Ap"r^� 14th, Due try a,,communication breakdown j. notice to .rye +t^byf,. pr.,gp �P o ao,d 's fwas not se�"r,� he ire i '" r�°154 he-'t�d' •w 1. �u,,,,,.. We. .a r� .rwtlh «r gHr,u,.w,yy - , a 'yr� t .........�,-+., .,•-w..H.,, ».ri!r-.,..wwa., ia.ww.!lw.r,..s. a•.w.w..n , + bias i;.ewn ['lust be contariued to ;April °2i� 19'06���''Attached is a copy. aftai letter. �...www.usswu;,,<ww«w.=...».«........w+.....-::w.N.w+b..y.,u++t.w...,awwrw.r+4,+..a....•..' w«•wx..,.<..r.'n.»w+,. ' +.»•++..a.. .. from the applicant r^ ques inr . that heµ de�xsion to reuxeuu" s rem`; be rWeue�s d, �:: lie Qxt^ ctot~'s �rT, h+� pp`]' cant' o�� iria narrata.Ve"y a 1 t raffic study Wilsey by Wilse and loam., a revz.sed` set of plans which are i�itended" to '" . address the conditions of approtiaZ noted in the Director's Decision, and a memo regarding CU 4-82 for 3im Settlemire. • Ai-TERNATIVES CONSIDERED Consider the applicant's request (do not revie , leaving Director° s stand Decision to nd appr(3Ved}, 2. Decide to proceed with review, opeh public hearing and ttlove to continue the he wring to Apr a. 28, 1986k and t^eluest staff to prepare a public hearing nott.ce to surround .ng property owners, • , r r j r rWr•Nlr.rrLrrrwN.•r.•.wrwf��lwr w+n.wrwrrr•wr+w++r+•wNwwh_4++.MwMW1, w^W+"_^'! Mw_r«.WMnMW.r.wM+'1w_.r41u..w1.w«..r 1��_.y ♦__NIA_ ....ate 1_•__ 8uGo ;TED.. ACTION } I � #2 per Council Previous direction, if still appropriate, 25O dri� F'/ rrtj • • � I • �.,x G RAM RE, INC. (....__________________________ one Lin,cgln CL,nie #470 H M 1 0 L W G enb rg Id !! COMPANIES Pariland,(DI: 9722,i t'• (5031 245.1976 d r I April 10, 1986 Tigard City Council P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 . RE: SDR 6-86/V5-86, First Interstate Trust Dear Councilors Cramore, Inc. , respectfully requests that the motio . -,by C�:tY Council to review the above captioned application t' escnd f 1 The reasons for the request are noted below: is issues have "been fully addressed �,y, a �. 1• Access and traffic �' Division, �" cif..,,by W1 is �tud,� ,prepare . ,.s a..,eY ., • � Ha�n the State Highway � � " o >w.µ' and were completely 1 �n 'City ngx,neeriY�g DX �,x , and the Ca.ty � ter the, last city r . va.sa. n agreed upon in a meeting held 'sYiort3.y.. of sued .a state x,ermit and the cQUnci�. meeting. �,have�.1ae�.n:�� access a , ' �+e ""^vwKK^M•KK.M,4rGN1 NM^`+rcY^,•'^°+ s ng:i.,n. a „i g Department has approved all the points s , y .; We°9 ve` o n�the revised drawings. , //y�1�]'}+� �p , , and to incorporate. �...�as hld�n� M..ideas the State Highway Department and 'the ideas from � y the City Engineering Division+into our project and they are not only just willing to issue the necessary permits, 1 hut are quite pleased with the project as proposed. , Extensive consideration was also given during this review relat .nc to the proposed businesses and their traffic ,, generation characteristics. i All the proposed g p sed uses for this project are out right� Pb-`rrnitteduses in the CG gone. 3. We are providing City,t Y> With this de vel P / apprOXima $$..5 O.,.,m,0 Q..a Worth of,a.off-site improvements, lie. , i eiy�,� � sidewalks', etc, i y turn r ents Will , * This includes a new right tur , . I lane on �reen�aurg Road. These improvements road work e ,•,r w , lan ,. i orients � , significantly improve the vehicular and -Pedestrian move i around the intersection.ta.,ox1. • I r, I , • j ; fl i• 1 tn tnt r ibnal Cb WICil of Sh6)itnq Ce nets t .., , a .,,, w a � " ) I I . 1 ( , 1 r . .. •Page Two April 10, 1986 4. The existing right and building` set back problem along Greenberg Road Will be eliminated by this project. 5. No objections or concerns have been raised by any of the fi surrounding property owners or anyone else. k: • on Center sidewalk requirement o. ° the ��. Ce to variance The �c�sed ,.:,; � Street a.s o, s. n M ith the code "requirements and • appropriate pedestrian access will "die°`provided.' 7, The project has been delayed for several weeks and the 1986 failure to. send the necessary notices for the April 14, hearing has postpone the council Review to April 28, 1986. . I 8. Due to these delays we have had to pay additional funds toward options on the land. This has increased our costs j. rig, ifi °antly on an already marginal• project and could put a stop to the developrent entirely. diligently r develop a good project In closing we have worked bencaou�ytthatvthis pr'o�ect w�.i�. • this corner. There should appreciate the Carrier aesthetically. We have met all of r. . greatly 4 with State Off icals charged w d Sta • the toring�ts dfcontrollingnthe development t�EOn�.toring ' of commercial projects. , and them. we We have revised our plans numerous times to � d ._. ..accommodate,. trust these professionals ask now that the Couh�:elors tr�..� their job t xofessa.ona�.s to do t ea.. I fob, and allow 4 us' to proceed with the development. r I Very incet yd o;. Barry . Cain I ,�,,,yy R.E. '(�,r�au�'p"y rel I I �4.i• ,�,a,Gl b i..l�+ � p p+� n I ' s.0 �,.. ,, Thomas Ba'�' ` i r 1 . i iii. f. . ....... .,.. ., ..,.... ..I... t k _ . .. wu.lYA Glf F u.Ja An.kV'a-, k,caw..dr V: litho mLmoRANoum t'aITY OF TIGARD OREGON 1 f • .' ApriApril �, 1986�i U; City Council. I FROM; Keith Liden, Senior Planner SUB3tC1t CU 4-82 Jim Settlemire approval °was grai~,ted to al.l.ow a As noted on the staff report, Conditional Use -app roual where The conditions of app flower shop on the subject property , conditions'. � 'n Resolution No 82-28 which imposed the following finalized �. ,� All curb cud 1 cuts onto Pacific Highway shall conform to City of Tigard � , street improvement standards, 2, A standard, curb shall be constructed to align with the existing curb along pacific Highway plans for the curb improvementt shall be ;submitted to B, Conn^potion p Division, Site roved by the City of Tigard Engineering approved plans shall submitted with the curb improvements plans to insure aid gUat 0n site drainage. 4 The Parking spaces s in front of the existing building shall be a to indicate head-in parking rather' than angle parking. . retrig�ed i Potholes 5 existing parking area shall be patched with asphalt. � , in � g p 4 r • a a r , CITY Or TIGARD D NOTICE OF DECISION • r SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 6-86 1 'R VARIANCE V 5-86 • F� ATIO PPLIC N: Request by First Interstate Trust to develop a 6800 sq. ft. _ " retail/auto service building and an automatic gar wash. ,A Variance a e 15 also I`; • requested for deletion of a portion of public '.sidewalk along Cent area of 13.5% where 15% is required. The property is to allow a landscaped r r cif t cap corner zoned C-G (Commercial General) and is located at the Northwest Pacific Hig hwa y and Greenburg Road (WCTM ZS1 2AA lots 1000, 1001, and 1100). . , hereby given that the Planning Director for the city of • DECISION; Notice i s, h y '� , .._..--..d applications subject to certain Tigard has APPROVED the above described app conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his v decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT , 1. Background lications for the' property, T'he City has reviewed several land use app roue a ;,c' rawer the most recent being a Conditional Use (CU 4-82) to app shop 2. Vicinity Information hway, Greenburg Road, and The property ,•,, t is surrounded by Pacific��oaath Highway, side of Pacific Highway �its ,a;„, Center Street. The zoning on cap (Central Business District). The propertii,s east of Greenberg Road y of eels north ial Professional) . ad sire zoned C-G (Commercial eGCneral) and the par Center Street are. zoned C p (Commercial 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The subject property consists of three tax lots which contain a . a sirn...le family residence. Driveway access is commercial building g Cpr�vewa acres presently available lable from Pacific Highway, Greenburg Road and Center Street The proposes g building and construct applicant pro oses the pp in to remove the puistin bux�. property and a s portion of a car wash �n the_ western go �reenbarg toad one dtrit�erlay t . e . utt a, the s _.. a.ce taa,l0auton►ota:ve sera buildxn near en re , for, each of n thrmre gclosel resemble the ce �;s xrrtended filled to closely _ trar7 property, . l be f which the property jai l �a g This will j parcel. A wall w 1 ac i f a c Highway,hway x,l l • require a retaining grade of Pas 10 feet near the western end of the pstrc. 20 foot • is ��� high too square foot sign has also presented for approval.T �;igh1Q q ~ begin s are also requested to reduce the required amount of Variances . ,: . 5X and to allow the y 13+ b• p' '• � � area from i5`K� tt? approtta.tnatelnter Street frontage, landscaped ar l most of the Ce • deletion of 0 sidewalk along DECISION SOR6 -56 / V5��36 Pagel DIRECTOR m w ri ,., M1 . i . 4. Agency and NPO Comments n comments: 0 i fo l w ,. e g has t The Engineering Division a . , a. A sanitary sewer connection permit for any new additions, 13.1 All work performed within the Pacific Highway right-of-way will require a Pe-mit from the State Highway Division. • c, Visual clearance must be maintained at intersections ct ion s and • driveways. the i Y on corner's and �' chair ramps must be installed a all co d � I i; � , I Wheel a proposed traffic signal island. • plan mustr.. be submitted for e. A traffic control pavement marking p the applicant. City and State approval, prior to installation by f. Th on Greenburt Road should not be installed ' way . The proposed drive because of the existing l congestion at the Pacific Highway intersects t Prohibiting left turn attempts on, .: he difficulty in p which calls fear• �' and the City policy t onto the property,, inimizin the number of access points on arterial and collector streets proposed to be installed at i line prop g, The storm drain catch of Creenburg Road and Center street needs to be the intersection rerouted to avoid crossing p rivate property. It is suggested r, that thy„ catchbaasin be connected directly to the manhole at the Intersection:' -il along Pacific Highway shall be relocated not h i The.. g�.Mardra g removed. L i a.s a potential i The proposed` retaining wail near Center street graffiti.: Care eyesore, particular`ly if it becomes a target g will act re . • A should landscaping which d be taken to provide landsc ' minimize the problem ,' r j , No objection to the variance requ est s The guilding X,ns p action Division and Tigard Water District have no '` II 1 .+ the request, th objection to The State Highway: diuisian states that a traffic impact a Ct' report is ; access alternatives. iA �2c�ad Approach necessary to evaluate the impact of aac i is required and the necessary street improvements shall be Permit s r-�d determined after the rep ort is s comp leted, pGE notes that several l utility:poles will need to be moved, E • . Ro- oth er comments h ale 'b S n received, ceivedi h I i I „ # P OzIRECrOR OCtSION, sDR 6-86 s6 1 u 5-86 Page 2 , I I x y . .! �� Y . 11111111i, - . u.lti.H i B, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION O N , ; L . consistent with the The proposed camn�ercial' development is basica hp Community Development relevant` standards and criteria contained in the the variance Code. Howevr, several aspects of the proposal including request warrant further ;discussion. 1, Access • I, e d b ,� noted by e reasons ns n i s not appropriate tor th.. The Greenbur'g Road `driveway, Engineering Division. This driveway should be removed and it is C ' ' the g he Pedestrian link between the public . . sidewalk and t '. recommended that a p project be provided in its place, ' 2. visual _Clearance ' Chapter 18,102 of the Code required that objects taller than three feet This r height cannot be within 30 feet of intersections ant near busy�in�r ect ons. It portion of the Code is particularly important ; that the two Red maples that are shown closest to Ithe ' i.s recommended th Also, the and Center Street dr,iveways be eliminated.pacific ��i,ghway � , three u: e height of all other landscaping material should not exceed ' m�t.�� g r feet. . 1 ' 8, Landscaping The ro vend landscaping plan generally conforms with Code requirements ' p P lot coverage with the exception of visual clearance (discussed above), .. 4 aced below under the variance, review street trees, and the treatment... ,- (n of the proposed retaining wall, by et St�•eet frontage does not include street trees as required ° II. ,. Center Street The deletion S the Code, presumably, because of the proposed retaining wall, the landscaping • : ears to be justified, however, 'yens app y have } . of street. t t �n this area needs revision. The onajarit of the 255 foot long r7---''''• treatment i t�,ally could retaining wall will be over six feet in height and potentially to soften or r'f a detrimental visual impact, to vegetation Proposed xs ° ! screen the wall, be Pre Pared � � y p architect for b p p` A revised landscaping Plan should recd by a lantisca� a a. area, The plan should contain a justification for the t��e retaining wall will screen all or most .t of the wall, plant 1�. ` and d height lant materials that e, wa oropose g on drawing illustrat�,ng th af` the retaining wall, an eevat • and landscaping' treatment of the right of--way area. . proposed landscaping, between the retaining wall and the curb, es d',' Variances . been made to reduce:, the two varaanee requests have As mentioned� earlier, ca `.n coverage to 13,5% and to eliminate a sideWa�lk Section t e13enter lands px g Street driveway to the western corner of the property Se ins the f approval . , a �' � o ta" following pp � tor al crxterla e granting of the ,rode � n � C Variance, �; � t COISIO SD 6- �{ V 46 / 5-86 Page. • w ......:a..c. r»i...W..,irM,._nf>•_4.. ar.. w+nr1J,......s...a:,4w+.,.}i.»F..t.WrN4+4✓• M,,,....i.m 1 /Aj a. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the A Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; b. There are special circuamstanckls that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography, or other circurn tances over which the '\ applicant has no confrol' and which are not applicable to other s in the same zoning district; Properties be the same as permitted under this Code and City u standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that,• is 4( reasonable possible, while permitting some economic use of the land, d. Existing physical, and natural systems, such as but not limited to• traffic, drainage, 'dramatic land forms `or parks will not be adversely . affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code; and e, The hardship is not self--imposed and the variance requested is th e is minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The proposed variance to the landscaping coverage requirement is minor ,and it will be difficult to notice a difference between the required minimum (6,317 square feet) and what is proposed (5,660 square feet) . The ' g : N a property is long and irregular in shape with street frontage on virtually the entire Perimeter unique rimeter which has resented unx ue problems related to Presented right-of-way dedication, street improvements, and internal circulation, j' . The proposed uses are permitted in the C-G zone and the request will not adversely affect phy;'kical or natural systems. Finally, the hardship is not self-imposed because the primary reason for . the variance is due to th e irregular u lar p arc el configuration. The request appears to be the minimum necessary and also the, required modifications e p slight h to the site and landscaping plans will cause a slip increase in amount of landscaped area, Thy proposed osed sidewalk vari ance alto appears to be justified for the f 1 following reasons State Highway right-of-way and the embankment for Pacific Highway • lies to the west of the property along Center Street and the potential for any extension Of the sidewalk is minimal, Because of the large amount of frontage, the applicant is responsible W e f o r a substantial quantity of str eet improvements `and ' this portion of sidewalk would be of minimal value and it could actually cans+ problems by encouraging pedestrians to cross the street ih the middle of the block a Gila .CTbR OLCTSION 5t)P :6.06 / V 5,...86 r &t c 4 • r Y The applicant is providing all other half street improvements as required by City Code and the development will be able to adequately p q y y ' r accommodate pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the perimeter of the site, 5 Signage` afoot tall 100 square . 20 f install 1 one 2 , s'n to n Tile` applicant licant xs proposing g foot sign anc! the standard requirement s allow for signs 20 feet . q .Code uire�nen in height and 70 square feet in area, However, during the Site • ' , Development Review process section 18,1.14,130 (g) (z ) allows up to an which have �. txonal 50%' increase a,n ;sign copy area .fordevelopments additional multiple tenants. The project will have four businesses and the proposed sign appears co be appropriate and it is consistent with City standards ' • 6, pacific Hihway Off—ramp to Commercial Street As part of a long range plan to alleviate traffic circulation problems in the downtown area and on Pacific the subject Highway an exit rare has been proposed from Pacific Highway adjacent to t property to Center Street and then on to Commercial Street. The , Engineering Division recommends that the development of this site • does not preclude the eventual construction of this exit, C. DECISI0N The Planning Director approves SbR` 6--96/V 5-86 subject to the following conditions'. i UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITxONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE NC OF BUILDING PERMITS, 1` 2, Standard half-street imp p rov ements, including sidewalk, curb, wheelchair ramps, driveway apron, storm drainage, guard rail (partial frontage) and utility signalization relocation shall be installed along the SW Pacific Hwy, frontage, Said improVements along SW pacific Highway shall be built to Major Arterial standards and ,4 �° conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements and 1 - conditions of the State I-aighwav OiVisinn permit, .,tiding sidewalk, curb, pavement 3, Standard half street hts �.hcl g �mproVeme markings, wheelchair ramps, storm drainage and utility relocation shall be installed along the SW Greenberg Road frontage, said �. i improvement along SW Greenberg Road shall be built to Major - Collector standards and conform to the alignment of existing adjacent r + .y t s Street Opening , improvements and conditions of the City penxng permit ....F rovements including (partial frontage �, standard half—street imp sidewalk, curb retaining wall driveWay apron, storm drainage and . . utility relocation shall be installed along the SW Center Street 1, frontage, Said improvements 8W Center Street shall be built to Local , Street standards and conform to the alignment of existing improvements and cond i.t iors of the '`City,s street Opening Per; it , ; , • S. DIRECTOR DECISION �tlR 6��6-86 / V` 5-8 6 Page tl 4 \. • .•b .. •. ..:A-«ML..w..J1.W ...-_. -..11.Y. 0l.ia..-.WW.'l+r.a. n.adi--•.14.•IA.t.. tl 5. Five (5) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans y and (1) itemized conytructon cost estimate, stamped by a Registered , Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public • improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for , approval, N • as .art of the �, ! • sewer connection 11 be provided part x 6. Sanitary `ton _details shall • Public improvement plans. 7. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until g g,S approved P arcs moms after the Eii tin grin Section has issued a prov14074,Public mpr oveme plans, The Section will require posting of a , the payment:ment of a permit fee and a sign installation fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit shall occur prior to, or concurrently vaith 'the issuance of approved public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC FORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES, L_DNG, AND AGREEMENTS. O. Additional right-of-way sha11, be dedicated to the Public at the Pacific Highway Greenberg Road intersection to provide fora turning lane onto Pacific Highway from Greenburg Road. The 'description for 4 said dedication shall be tied to the e�tistin right-of-way centerline • dedication� , g � document shall . Washington County. GE City The dedication doc�,ni DEDICATION as established by be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section. FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED. 9. A p ermit shall be obtained by the applicant, for work proposed to be from the State Highway Division A done within SW Pacific Highway do , • copy of said permit shall be provided to the City. Visual sual clearance at driveways and at intersections shall be provided for in accordance wit h Municipal Code Chapter 18,102. t..of pavement marking, signal and signing • 11� A trafFic .and pedestra.an can r p t , plan prepared, by a registered civil engineer, detailing a 'proposed / , 1 p - marking, signal and signing improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval and to the State Highway Division for approval. , Direct vehicular ingress-egress at Greenbdrg Road shall not be permitted. a r on . �e driveway apron shall b e installed from the proposed , s h sidewalk 18 Concrete .ss.de a of. on pacific # ighcway, along Pacific Highway, along Greenbu Road along, Center Street, to the proposed driveway apron on Center Street. 14. Relocation of any existing utilities, poles, pi"pes, wires,es, signals, g , signal loops, or any such equipment shall be at the expense of the app l i c an r DIRECTOR DECISION .x�. . . . ..._ .. ... ..,, .., .. ..•. . . ; . .. ... n • � ,1. A r • • .. L......IJ:..—.+.n.r _ aw.. 4+M. w...... ., nw.a. ..+.... ..t.. ..W.++-:.:.4't ♦ M._.+xurmn x nom.•-- ' • revised ' site plan shall be submitted for Community Development Y 15. A r' p Director approval which deletes the proposed driveway on Greenbury l' e Road and illustrates the location of the proposed free standing sign. plan shall be submitted for Community 16. A revised landscaping p ' Development p consistent with Chapter 18, 102 .' . p Director approval which is con Visual clearance, specifically, the two Red maple trees adjacent to f the Center Street and Pacific Highway driveways shall be deleted and , verification shall be provided that the mature height (;yf other '' landscaping materials will be less than three feet. Also, the ' landscaped area shall not be reduced to less than 18.5% of the total lot area. 17. A landscaping plan, prepared by a landscape architect, shall be submitted for Community Development Director approval Which deals k with the retaining wall including the following: : y a. Landscaping materials to screen all or most of the wall, • 'n • b, Elevation drawing,'. of the proposed retaining wall and plant materials. c. Landscaping material between the retaining wall and the curb , d. Reduction of wall height as much as practical. 18. Maintenance of the landscaping within the Center Street right—of•-.4way r shall be the responsibility b lit y of the app lacart/prdpert Y ow ner. , r, 19, The one free standing sign shall not exceed 100 sq, feet per side or , a total of 200 square feet. Tax lots 1000 1001, and 1100 shall be combined into one parcel, I, i`s approval is valid if exercised within one Year of the final x decisioh date noted below' •L I , 0, PROCEDURE . .. . posted at City Hall 1 posted y to: Notx,ce andxmdi.l.ec� publxshe in the newspaper, 1, r 1 �' kX The applicant & owners i r Xx --- i distance) i required , • rp u i }` , Owners of record within the q � * The affected Neighborhood Plnni'ng Organization AX Affected governmental agencie'"s . 2, Final Decision'. r THE DECISION SHALL DE `FINAL ON March 25 1986 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS T 0! FILED i i I • i , 1 ® I OtRFCTOR dECL h ON S b R 6-06 V � � Page � o R., I', .,.,.w..,..e.....u.,.ldo-e...ww+...«✓.:.z.:,u;a.t:,«t.va..wiit:.M..w:aeey.:.,:w..•oa....w...».:».v irm....r„. '...,sk..ov,>:+..G....., , 3. Appeal Any party to the decision ray appeal this decision in accordance with • Section 18,32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community De‘iel.opment Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 2:30_ P.M. March 25, _1986 . 4, 4. Quest ions If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City , Nall, 12755 I,SW . Ash, PO-Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 689--4171. 6 e // pREPAREt By R ith idea, Senior Planner DA • .‘ ----..--"2 'i . --/LY-Z . ..,..ife 3 ‘fte_.h...._______. William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE APPROVED (KSLt2418P/(cimj)' i 4 AP . 4 3 A .A• .; I, / w1_V Rte 0 IIII il .4 1111111111/‘W. ' ”II glie 11 Fir 4e4t / 114.1P la S4S / ''''''''''••• 41P*141 ‘44446fr> ill°41rgel° /1' 411. - - . 41),,-..„,.,.. ,..,4140dirl, -,..,:,..',. . , bZRECTOP OECXSION SDP 6-86 I V 5-86 Page 3 ur 1 • r. . BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. "Land Planning, Survey, and Design Specialists" • January 31 , 1986 . • Mr. Keith S. Liden Senior Planner City of Tigard ` Community Development Department artmen t . • • P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 I, c o Re: Site Development Review Application f or 60-Minute Tune/Retail Development for Gramore, Inc.', at the Northwest Corner of Highway 99W and S.W. Greenberg Road Our Job No. 1898 ? Dear Mr. Liden: Pursuant to our pre-application conference held on Thursday, January 30 1986, I want to take this opportunity to supply your office with the f o l l o w i n g ,documentation and re q uest a forma/ review in accordance for this Project. ' i y d site development review process P I; 6 -I of Tigard This the has been compiled 'based upon the application information with . ., This tnf brochure provided by your office, together with the Standard Site Develop- ' Review application. 1 . One (1 ) original yellow copy of the Site Development Review appiica i ion �ws th the Information i on appropriately provided ided and . the signature of the owner and/or agent indicated You Ii should be advised that this office is acting as the repre- sentative for the applicant, and we should receive copies of all documentation and any notices issued by your office. This Information should be submitted to our Seattle office at the following address. Dar hausen Consulting Engineers, 6625 South 190th, Suite 10 , 32 n t on 080 Kent, mash i g 6625 South 190th, 4 102 a' Kent,Wdshingion 98082 • (206)872.5622 • , • „w(.. ?.st'.7G.'...I,.w..w,.. .w.1NF,rv'Nt.w=..S+'Ft+wk{{ --'4,, r., t 41 Vd.-M�m-.nMw`«... r . ..7 .-..A..r..I1;r.S.i,:1.,..u..u.:d,.CWr•1,.-..kw..l...`r..44=.+-« .... ..4.,tM e.,rM1w.N-W,. { • C fl• Mr. Keith S. Liden Senior Planner . Community Development Department -2- January 31, 1986 { , . . f f Tigard 2. One C1 ) check made payable to the City o y 9 and in the amount of $300 for the processing of the site deveiopment review package. ' . 3. Five (5) copies of the site development plan for the project' at the scale of 1" = 20' providing all of the appropriate site development details for the proposed project. 40 Five (5) copies of architectural elevation plans providing , . basic information concerning the "architectural l ook" for the buildings on the site. 5. One (1 ) copy of the Washington County Assessor's map for the , , property with the parcel outlined in red. 6. One (1 ) list of the names and address of all persons owning property within 100 feet of the subject site, { . 7. One (1 ) copy of a title transfer instrument/deed to the site verifying the legal description and the current ownership. Five (5 grading/drainage and utility plan 8. !=i v ) copies of for the project providing information regarding storm drainage Improvements, site grades, and sanitary sewer service for the project. `• g. Five (5) c- opie s ' of a site e survey worksheet hes t coI m f e ted for r the i t tproperty p rovidi n g ex s t n g topographic information and location of existing Public and private improvements. 10. Five (5) copies of a pre l i m i nary landscaping p l an providing , the required information incorporated within the application requirements, sign application,cati on; to ether with 11 . Five (5) copies of ''a proposed s gn app 9 j for pole sign providing advertising for � � � � the ' ust i f i cat ion fof the o I e ,the proposed project. The sign being requested Is larger than that which is allowed under the standard provisions of \ the code, but is within the 50 Percent increase limits a l l ow- able under administrative review by your office. I 12. One It 1 )) of the variance application supporting the � copy ping area on the site as � requested reduction in the i an sca f set forth in the site plan. { 9 t Y Wig i • Mr. Keith S. Liden • Senior Planner January 31, 1986 Department -3 . Com�nun i t y Development • Would you please begin the processing of this Site Development • Review application and forward to this office your written response and approval as soon as possible. The application documents incorporate the comments that were made by your staff at both of our previous meetings and • hopefully, +he project as it is 'designed will meet with your approval . We , ' are also aWare of your requirements for the building permit review, and we will be sure that our final plans, which will be prepared at the same scale, will be complete in the necessary details for review. It should be noted that the unique configuration of the property, combined with the large amount of street frontage around the site, has created a need for several variances from the existing code regulations which need to be addressed in the site review process. At the same time, we believe,the design of the project has hopefully 'resulted In a creative approach to the use of the site. The following specific comments should be taken into consideration in your review. 1 . We w i l l be bringing n�i ng the entire ra Project c+ a PP ray 1 a� ( y t grade e with Highway 99W. This particularly applies to the westerly por±ion of the site which is' currently vacant. The filling of the site will result in the need for a slope easement on adjoining property to the west from the Oregon Department of Transportation, and a retaining wall along the north, property boundary adjacent to Center Street. This retaining wall will be variable in height from a rom .� mini mutr of 2 feet to a // maximum of approximately 12 guardrail A �iva rdrail will be • provided along the edge of the asphalt, and the design drawings provide i de a cross sectio n of th e proposed construe- . +ion. As agreed, the wall will be constructed on the • property line with the landscaping strip lying inside of the wall on the site itself. Specific design calculations and a report from a certified soils engineer wi l l be provided With the building g pe emit plans for this s p art of the proJect. 2. The filling on the site will be completed In accordance with A ' sta. nda rd geotechnical g o t echnic a) r ecom end ati ons for the placement of structural fill . Once aga i n, a report and recommendat i on will be provided wi -h a building permit for this part of the he project' and con±l huous . available during reports for compaction will be j filling the fillin process. All of the work In c' this regard will be completed under the supervision of a qualified geotechnical consultant. 3e The amount of street frontage on the property has resulted ih a level of off-site Improvement being required for the de ve l p a `l �o which far exceeds that which is reasonably m n expected for normal commercial development, The developer • • .. ...4.. r.. ..,sL',.w,...•.:A.r-..In� ..R 4I...«n'.1.a4.?»• . .,4... w w •...........••W....+�Yn..,i.k... .«INkw—A:.`. ..4..•.•.4..MN-•r— . • Mr. Keith S. Liden Y Senior Planner January 31 , 1986 Community Development Department -4- I • i s proposing to complete these improvements mp rov em ants. and dedicate is at e the additional right-of-way necessary to accommodate the street s of the city-+ the re' u i rement f y e with. improvements in accor�anc q � of Tigard and the Oregon Department of Transportation. 9 r th_a.. .Q7 i M th i s o l aces__a har. A • •1 . . w Q l 11, I- - -I . -et frontage w i h i s nenera i I y th 'oe=--of development, and we I�pe that t k�.LL; .,� �-- i n. the rev IC. !process. The property boundaries are quite V irregular, and present unique problems for developing a or the site. Due to the unusual con f i gore- { iaou-f• f , I usable y tion, ;accessibility to buildings and placement of structures { In parking areas becomes more difficult with respect to p I I We have been able to meet all 1' of the . existing city codes. in this requirements of the City of Tigard Zoning Code re ardb wlandscaping requirement. with the exception of the I and g landscaping i n. L for this project i s 15 The required red amcount of ( p g T � , Percent. s encompasses 42,115 square feet, ercent. The gross site area encompas '. p g rea would therefore be 6,317 and the required Iandsca in a q feet posing to provide 5,680 square feet, square . We are proposing which represent ,s 13.5 percent of the gross site area. N We are therefore requesting rig s i an administrative n i strat i ve variance of this landscaping requirement in accordance with the attached variance application. We are providing more intensive • landscaping within the areas on the site than Is required by l ' `*� code, and we w i l l ''a also be landscaping some property within the existing right--of-Way, which increases the gross area I being landscaped as a part of this project. We assume that II these points will be taken into consideration in the review of the variance application. pre-development application conference, we 4. During te reurement to Install sidewalks along the discussed q i property :frontage for the length of Center Street. The site plan that we have submitted proposes 'that sidewalks be extended along Highway 99W from the proposed curb access to � and north around this state highway, and then extending east and through the intersection with S.W. Greenberg Road. The side- ! walks would extend continuously along S.W. Greenberg Road, � . around '+he Intersection with Center Street, and up to the curb cut into the project on Center Street itself, Beyond the curb cut, we would propose to simply widen the street to a distance 17 feet from the centerline) and then install curb This would leave a strip of land 7 1/2 feet in I�! and gutter. �o from the back of the curb width within the r i ghf-,of-way, the property 1 i ne t o allow f or the future uture construction of Ao got.. w • • 5 Mr. Keith S. Liden Senior P I c.rnner _ � January 31, 1 g8 Community Development Department f n , sidewalks aiks in th i area.a. Our reasoning not to install the t . sidewaiks af this time includes the following Points. . a. As indicated earlier in this letter, in an exoessive already being required to participate , . a amount of public improvements due to the configuration �� !f i t i s not 1, of the site and the extensive frontage. ,absolutely necessary for the public health, safety and welfare to installa sidewalk along Center Street, then we would propose to delay this construction. This . wouldprovide some relief for the developer in re- could prov I cognition i t i on of the u'n i que configuration of the property and the hardship that it presents, which is not appiic- . ,able 1-o other parcels in the area, b. We o e are p a retaining wa l I along Center Street .`e � proposing i n g for most of the property, as shown on the site plan. There will therefore be no access from the s.i+eonto 'Center Street for veh i cu I e,r or pedestrian traffic Until near the intersection with S.W. Greenberg Road, There- pedestrian an movement W i l l I not be encouraged on fore, p . i�il i s side of reduce the need the street. This would redo for a sidewalk at this location. site on west subject c. sidewalks do .not exist wc,si o•� the J Center Street on either side, and there are no side- wa I ks b on the north side of Center Street adjacent to h All of the businesses and houses which , the property: . exist along Center Street Ile' to the north of Center Street across from the subject property, and the appropriate place to install sidewalks in the future g i . the street If side- • h orth side of wool 'i only on the south side of the. would be along the n �' walks were installe Y street j , s would encour`- to e subject site this to potentially cross in 1-he middle of t ad,jaces�t t h age pedestrians potentially , . . the block on Center Street to reach the sidewalk, which would not be In the best interests of the City of . Tigard. is considered significant, ns ld not c� d. Traffic on Center Street l.� r7 since if is 'a relatively minor access street 'compared with S.W. Greenberg Road and ; Hghr;raYTherefore,. • p the need for a s i dewa l k along �.W . center Street would be limited to prov i de for aloguate pedest rian safety. • 1 is, , , • . . , ''' i . • • .,J4hr.w.a. .,F'+..-F.J.U.i,...a,u.Y ..w.»...1utw-_ +au'.N.a. wrH.w.«+, , • .. a.. .. .t.« .. .« ..I.,u,a. . ...4.,...:z.t.;u+ .. M Fs 4 , ' Mr. Keith S. Liden • ''“ Senior Planner Community Dev I p men t De January 31 1986 Please review this reasoning and the information provided, 1 and determine whether or not the requirement for sidewalks along w n Center Street can be waived for this project westerly of the curb cut nearlthe northeast corner of the site. • � re--days I o mt9n r'ev i ew 5, Another Issue of concern during the p p � .° I ofb conference related to the proposed "right i ni , iOit r out"es curb I access to S.W. Greenberg Road near the southeast corner quite s the property. This curb access location . cri tical to the successful operation on the site and to I traffic congestion, once again, within the site itself limit and at the other two access locations. We understand your o cerns regarding potential left--hand turning movement for cn g , I traffic frying to turn left into the site northbound on S.W. t y . Greenberg Road. We would therefore propose to instal a Ten -ih of ”Co curbing delineating the northbound and , limited g Greenberg Road, for a limited southbound lanes on S.W. distance north from the intersect eank Th n� h curb i riarking Tot. eastlof g wool d not l access into and out of t�h p prohibit prevent cleft-ha/Id 'turnin movement th© property, but would p g .w.J to and out of the subject project. At the same t me, it , �n Would allow for the movement of southbound traffic on S.W.S.W1 " Greenberg Road into the property to avoid additional vehiu Cie m intersection with Highway 99W. • l lar movement through •I•h© . off of J� 8 entering subject site would d a I so allow I ow ,car s enter R n the sub act �i space and then . Highway 99W to park in front of the retail p exit the property at one of the two locations, thus giving :. I a .` option on to the customer, rather than requiring ��I I of the exit the nation. p site at the same location.} traffic to enter and o -I•h� ra arty severely • Once again, the configuration f p p for deve l opMent of the' ' limits the layouts that are possible j g � � d oinin streets is critical site, and curb access onto the a If the for the successful dev'elo ment of the project. , p 'center curbing proposed on S.W. Greenber g Road would elimin- , to `the ma or i ty of the concern of your Transportation a J e artment for traffic movement en S.W. Greenberg Road, then � a pwould hope that the curb access would he approved as � ;w e p i shown. I d r er .� l;in1ly the a p. a larger I includes a reque.� t far i�. y; p I i cat i on allowed under the zoning n. c:ode, encom • � signtl•tan I� nortnallyall J � . - `e reason for the request i s Th , passing 1 G5 square feet. y the infer- , . mesa �� � twofold. First of all , heavy traffic Holum section and the relatively high speed allowed on Highway , j• i � y or��motorists near the 99W tends to limit the perceptiart •llme for I , . R . ♦ „ 1 r .n.+.-•a.✓.✓.�.+t..w'._..'.++'r+•.L., .L.....rc.....au,- .......sw Jr-..+.-o.l.d.w:« alt.. .WI . uv...o:,......; ' ( `Y14:� ATTACHMENT TO GRAMORE, INC., LANDSCAPING VARIANCE SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA This attachment provides the summary arguments for the request for a landscape variance for the above-referenced P variance eferenced project to reduce the required . landscaping area a b Y 1 ,5 percent. The required landscaping for this � particular project within the zon e classificatian 1s 15 percent, or approxi- mately 6,317 square feet. The requested reduction amounts to approximately � 10.1 percent of the gross `required landscaping area, which is the limit of the requested variance. The specific approval criteria for a variance, "a through nE " are summarized below. The actual identified as Section A gh r ar amount of on-site area i rovided is e q ual to 5,680 square feet, which is 637 p square feet less than required. A. The proposed reduction will not be materially detrimental to the ". : purposes of the code or in conflict with any comprehensive plan policy.' The landscaping that has been provided is reasonably close to the required landscaping, and with the supplemental " • landscaping pro p ose d within the excess right-of-way along ong Highway 99W, Which amount.. to an additional 4,300 square f eet of area, we ;• . would exceed the required land scaping percentage on the site itself. There are no surrounding uses of a residential nature which would necessitate more significant landscaping standards or • I buffer areas, and for this particular project which is compIetly bounded by public streets, the primary purpose of the landscaping is to develop a more aesthetically pleasing project in accordance with general development principals The specific percentages w w i ific are not necessary to buffer the project from surrounding ng properties. B. This particular parcel Is unique to ell 'other properties in the area since it is bounded on all sides by public right-of-way. The Parcel Itself is approximately one acre in size and not only has over 800 feet of street fran age, but it also has a long narrow configuration which requires an excessive amount of P perimeter landscaping, coupled with an excessive extent of off- has no control over the property improvements. applicant h site im rovements. The appiica • boundaries, which also makes it extremely difficult to place buildings and improvements on the subject site within the code regulations: As the property becomes more narrow toward to { sou;th,, it is necessary to increase the asphalt area in order to ' gain access to 'p posed structures. It is clear that other • I a�'n a proposed in the immediate vicinity ar» � Properties ��- e riot of affected in the same manner as t his p arcel , and this p arcel mus t be considered unique. • i898�02 *) .1 e ' .'A U ,•,«.—lw.::Dh.++w..rt.,W`n,+M,» i....Jifih�H+.s.,+haa4».r„tam.+«•C•a.,ur.vli:.SfW.. j. 1.•. • Mr. Keith S. Liden , .1,,' Senior Planner January 31 1986 Community Development Department -7- - site to become aware of the project, and due to the channel i- •` ' nation and intersection, control at S.W. Greenberg Road,, the , customers of the property's businesses may not • ial cup potent realize 'that the business exists until they are past the ' . 1 property. It is therefore necessary to obtain as much advertising as possible to allow people ample time to com- „ lete their lane changes and enter the property. Secondly, p �, there:are a number of businesses built close to the street on. Highway 99W.; and there are a myriad of poles and other obstructions which limit visibility along this street. Once 1. . . again, in order to obtain reasonable exposure, it will be • n Y I necessary to achieve a larger sign area to the extent .1 allowable within the administrative guidelines of the City of Tigard. . I hope this provides you with a complete package of information 1, r. to review this project. If you have any questions or wish to ” ; necessary ' ' • discuss if in further detail , please' do not hesitate to contact me at 872 .5522 at your convenience. i certainlyVappreciate the assistance f, that your staff has provided to us in the pre--design effort on thi$ project, .� :approval within the next ;�0 p . #„ � � and I look forward to a .successful development meat days. Thank' you. .� y I Respect * y, I , M ✓ r m I Thomas Ad aarghaus P,n P. E.. President w rM AB sm I c152.o� ' • • enc As Noted . •',. cC�u Mr. Barry Cain, Gramore, inc. (w/enc.) Mr. Bob Beaupre , G, amore, nc. (W/ � � l k Dennis i. g Consulting Engineers, Irc. Mr. J.J , boriovan Bar tyausen : • x� I• l' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' . a I r A w i "l/ ,r ! 1 w r rl 4•.>r rW.awr.1:+.:hV1.+...ar,.a..w+'`iTmr..Nr+':tr,+.vM.rm.AWr u...i«_,1 wrn:•.4..+r.rFxwV,F1.u.:uJr•.++r..n z..u.ri.e«::.a?i.«.oYra...as..N+.I A.-M•waa.w !ry •` * 1 .0 I k ` • ( ,I • C. The uses proposed are identical to the uses allowed within the , code, and no variances are being requested. Extensive public improvements: are being provided by the applicant for the surround- ing street system, and this presents a significant economic burden to this particular applicant based on the property con- figuration. To the greatest extert reasonably possible, City standards have been met, while permitting the economic use of the land. The requested variance in the landscaping area is therefore being justified to offset the extensive public improvements being required. ,., , 0.L , Existing physical and natural systems will not be impacted one way or the other by the landscaping on the project and, therefore the subject variance will have no impact on these systems. E. The hardship that would be created by requiring the applicant to meed the code requirement is not self imposed and is due specifi- cally to the fact that the unique configuration of the property , necessitates careful review of development alternatives in order i , to meet other applicable City standards. These other standards include access driveways, parking requirements, and other restric- tions. The Variance being requested, which amouhts to 10 percent of the gross amount of the required landscaping area on the site, is the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship and l'• • would probably not be noted by any surrounding property owner or , • • person in the area. I n addition, the extra landscaping which h will be provided b y the applicant within the r i g ht-of-wa y will help to . p compensate for this loss of area. e , • r T; • I I ' r n Cq , • l '. 1 j 14 s tiv '+ . i ":::::, , , . v. ,__.. 3 1 , , . . . . , . . . . , , ,. c . , . , 1 1 . . . , . 1 . ...., , 1 1 . , . , , , , '.. ... .. ., 1, ,, : ,, -,,;-, : . , :, 0 A3, : , _. . , : ‘ . . , . (../,-.---- ,. . , , . , 1 . . , , 1 ' ' :, :, , , : ', • , ' - ' ', cu, ,- . ' ,6,,,,,,, (6-00, ) , , : - • 1 , , . . , , . „ 1 . , , , . ,1 . , , :-,9- i. e. bis.,,.s/. , . ., ... . . , - L , : . . . . , ,. H 1 , : : , , ---:- , . :, : , H . - , . , C _ r . . ., . . . vie , , ... , 1 1 , , r � •. ' , , ' a,,(..,41/4, ,, c,...,_'...2a(1/4-(:::,-, ; H,; ' ;. , . ... cr(,,' . . , , a , 1 . ... ; . , •• , . ' - ' ' , ' ,,,,t,) / r ' c,..,',1 ,,,, e„ z,0) 1 fir° `4. , , rz 0,74 ceeeil,A., e.,,v , ; ' 1 ,,. ,, : . ,, yf .� , ; - I:, ; , ,; ; i. ,,,....,,,-- .P , , 1 , ,, , ,,, , ,:i 1 : i ; , ,,,„( ,,,,, ..,, . , . , ,,, 1 ; ; , ' 1 , , , , . , . , 1,..„, . , , . . , ,: „„„,. . . , . • .- , . . . . , . . i• ,. i , . . . . lr 9,3 Approve OLCC Application* . 0 Capone': Pizza Company, 13066 SW Pacific Highway, R Application o Pizza Caboose Ltd. , 11670 SW Pacific Highway, R Application cation • o The Royal Gate (new business name not, selected yet), 11445 SW Pacific Highway, Dispenser Class A Application ' o Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant, 11619 SW Pac. Hwy. , R Application 9.4 Ratif Solid Waste Rate Increase Effective 4/1/86 Res. Ratify ct�.ve 4✓1./66 - Res. 86�-32 9.5 Approve Parks Maintenance Contingency. Transfer R 36-36 9.6 Approve Utilities & Franchises Committee Appointment - Res. 66. 34 9.7 Authorize Civic Center Relocation Professional Moving Company Hire 9,8 Accept Greenway Dedication — Summer Hills Park 1: 9,9 Approve Training Requests o . City Administrator — Regional City Management Conf., $137.50 o Asst, To Admin, •- Regional City Mngmt, Conf, $137.50 • 9,10 Approve Park Grounds Maintenance Proposal & Authorize Agreement a. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Brian to agenda . to be discussed ; approve the consent 'gender without '� B which is and 9.2b decision for SOR 6,-.86/V '5,46 Approved by unanimous vote of Council present, b, ,2b Community Development Director discussed concerns about the si 1walk' deletion, • Councilor Edwards moved to r,a11 the decision up fth reouhci.l. review on April 14, 1906, Motion by Councilor Brian, Approved by unanimous vote of Council°.prelenta c, .4 Senior Planner Liden requested Council, amend the resolution to include a hew which Exhibit uA►r a,�hach sets forth the correct • rates for solid waste pickup, Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Brian to amend resolution by replacing Exhibit "A" with corrected n Approved by unanimous vote of Council present, d 6 Consensus of Council wag to hold this item for consideration"at a future meeting, {: PEAL;:PURi IC �HEARIN , , LOAN ,, 1;(�, AP � � �� a� : �' '�r*rl�;ll���#��,��I�{'" E..� '�A�lw�iCrra AND L�} •_.••..n...._....W.� y ' ,,,:. i ��eal at'1 a : rovra1 by the Planning ,o ,request by iv�0 #� to i�e���� oh`r at�x ( �+ � ,, mmi ,sior cif a suhdivisi• in dividing 8,68 acres into 18 'lots with a Q a q t, This will be an "argument—type" minimum lot si��. of 1,5010 square fee hearing o .l. The Council. will Consider•I only the record before the ry y P1annirq Commission, Which' is on file at City Hall, The Council shall not tonsi•der any new testimony or evidence which is not in lthe record in accordance with Section 1.8,32.320 of the Tigard Municipal Code, Y• wt, Publ ir, ble err 1.tt9 C3Pr,iiraii her g e COUNCCZ;{. MaIl'Ulk ! MARCH X74, 1906 1 i ,. Jw .aaP ..+.ev..l.- ...w,..in.J4.-,.i.« n H•1.-f.l ..w.Aa.f...S...4..ti.l.• •w.r-L...w�f..fMw.•..1;+4t1--,u:MAr.,.. .nl.,M..,.6e)6,vi,,,, , . , k ' , 5 , .., v , ------- L iAR HAUSEN ONSULTING NGINEERS, N � Land Planning, Survey, and Design Specialists" h March 31, 1986 s Q n Leona! N Gu nder , ' Mr. L r. sQ er i , Assistant [?istr i ct Ma in�e;,ance sup v .>� Oren .)i) Departrnent of Transportation . 2131 S 0W. cho l is Ferry Road Port I arid, OR 97225 l;.' + RE: Request for Finalization of O.D.O.T. Permit for Work • ICE. Re ues f q sociated with the Tigard Auto Stop a+ S.W. Greenberg Road and Pacif is Highway (Highway 99W) k • Our Job No. 1898 , o a I Dear Le e o • We have recently received approval from the City f Tigard Y for the above referenced project being developed by Gramore, Inc. The have been completed and have been prepared col-Isis- construct ion plans hav b p� ` as comment s received from tent with City of Tigard Standards, as well your off ice 1 n the pasta We have also completed e 4 ed and' reviewed the w, y Traffic impact Study requested by your off ice, a copy of which has y already been fo �r++ard 1-o deo our offi ce by Wilsey and Hamm, Inc., on behalf of 1-he ripp I icant. The specific concerns and requ iremerits expressed in ''he Traf f is I P act Study have been i n cor p orated info 1-he ,design plans. I I is time I would request your final review of the • lit t h �► enclosed documents' representing' the final i mproverrierrt plans prepared -r Two (2) complete sets of plans are project. for the above-referenced eferenced pro,jie. enclosed for your review at this time, and it is my understanding that , your office will I l re ar tua I perms o be signature i hbtheh�erm it as e the ��c /�, y prepare � 1 p Specific details which need p ' applicant. S eoif , approvals for the pro jelct are summarized below. ; i 1 p The guardrail along Highw �ay.9 wi i l be removed since It o er be necessar along the frontage of the r�illhoing �' property. A l f la i red end on the guardrail Will be • provided hear the southwesterly property boundary of the d, } I I I I , °9498 S,\Aj. CarhUr 81Vd,, #304 •. Portland,C)reOoti .:1 1 q A I 5®3 24 Ho me�iflae. s 525 South 190th #1�2 o Kent Washington 08082 • (2o)872-5522 , , .. • - , + , • L • rJ ./4 .J, ..«vF.a .+- i.t .«..a..w..s.., A..y.• '^^."••a:Lw '1#, J •.«s s,.t_» —'dw#J4.n. 1 s n n • t M Mr. Leona I H. Cu nderson • •. , State of Oregon March 31, 19 6 • Department of Transpertat ion -2- ls , subject site'. The new instal Iation wi I l be consistent . with O.D.O.T. guidelines. 2. We have Ind i f ied the intersection design for the I right-turn lane at S.W. Greenberg Road and Highway 99W. The revisions have been based upon recommendations from ` the Traf f io I mp'ct Report and include a modification to •, a 55-foot radius for the face of curb, and a 17-foot r e aisle` between the curb and the island. Three feet d 1) clearance has been provided from the existing • (3 � ofcl p traffic signal mast, which will remain together with the 9 power p ter- eMistin ower o1e within the •island at the in section. We are proposing to sawcut around the' provide new as asphalt a l t paving • shown den , Intersection as shown androvi consistent with 0.D.0.T. specifications. Ocanstruct ion • s of f these he se improvements should d be incorporated into your permit. 1 I - oat concrete walk and a ate f ® ,proposing nstll We a r °f-o i 3® , ' ' curb, together, with limited ,additional asphalt along , . Highway 99W, as depicted on the attached plans. I proverrants are'aons istent with the be( i eve these 1,m� Traffic Impact Report and with our 'previous discussions ; ,• 1 1 this roject. 1 on p 4. We 1wi l l be f it ing in the existing right-of-way, as depicted on the final grading plan an for.the project, I ,� hw a I adjacent a Highway along the frontage of the ��property ,� 9 99W. The p I acement of this fill will occur at the same • time the subject property is prepared for construction, d upon c�bmp let ion,p it w i I I eliminate the need for the I I and ardpa i l . Th is area will also be generally landscaped gu . with a I Ight groundcover requ i r"i ng l 1 mited maintenance by the applicant I I ,. 5 os n to provide a fill slope extending I I t We are proposing g p , ly from 'subject p R Y I :;,�uthe~l froth the ro ert into the excess state r i ghtof-way as shown on the grading plan, with 1th a II e 'S�aewi6ibe slope vertical . Th p to 1 stab i`I i xed woithg raundcover, and a guardra 1 I will be top of the, s lop e: I believe we have provided at the (a ,�, discussed this previously, and you had indicated that L there would not be a problem with f i l l i n g ''i in this is I q • particular area of •i-he state right-of-war. 1 I rx ,, • •• l .,., , h. w • • • Mr. Leon& H. Gunderson State of Oregon { �M• •�� March 31, 1986 De ..artment of Transpor•taat ion ' 3 Miar P 6. A concrete retaining wa l I was proposed on private the to 1-he state right-of-way ght-of-way at adjacent .� }. w property ,d extending along S.W.,.southwest corner of the project ar,, Center Street. Specific structura 1 de •a I Is of the wa I I • are provided on Sheet 4 of the attar hed plans, and 1-he grading p I afl accurately d+ep i c r s the location_ of the wall relative to the right-of-way. Since the wall will be : expect that spec i f is approval constructed completely on pr i ete property, I would not • al wuId be required by your ` ; office. However, since it 1 lies adjacent to a portion (,•i. your right--of- way, I wou I d also ask for your approval of this retainin 9 wall as well aveals also modified the enclosed construct ion plans ,. ,. 7. We have , . which reflect the traffic contra l at the entrance to the project off of S.W. Greenberg Road, ;and for the i n"res s/egress onto Highway 99W. The driveway entrance g e as been more, into this site off of S.W. Greenberg Road h • carefuI'1y del ineated with a minimum inside turning ' radius of 15 feet for cars enters rig this site, which , • . , b eIieve is the m in imum ac c epta ble . Thi s desig n also so i ncarpertes a re located sidewalk onto the property s • itself, and appropriate s ignage to dearly ind ioa e that this Is an entrance onl y. Y ou wil I , also note from the design that it will be virtually imp ossible for a vehicle toimake a left-hand turn into the site off of The ingress g ress and egress onto • '! S.W. Greenberg Road. 9 . 4 99W has also been ilodif led 'to include a curbed . Highway 9 W median, which in this case will be a solid concrete the. wiy two turning lanes. i s l arid' seporati ng �h driveway v®wa into o We will essential a B i ybeusing one- �a lf of a sta n'. dard • g � /r e control device as provided vided to this of f_ i ce by your department at our previous y` meeting. We obviously cannot ach ieve the red s . indicated on your attachment, s i n ce we do not have that much property to work w ith, and the separation between , the site paving and the edge of asphalt on Highway 99W •' Is only about 15 feet. However, I believe we have achieved the basic results intended, and 1.- would ask for y � • or ssue as we i 1 . � ,. year, careful scrutin of th his particular e a � r o° Would you please proceed to issue �l he permit for t office i f you priate f lmprovemehts as soon as poss ib le, and notify fthis off y need additional Brig ineer'�ing details or documents=i�an to process the n. . • n st • • Mr. Leona! H. Gunderson State of Oregon • Department of Trenspertat ion -4- March 31, 1986 permit. We are locking forward to commencing with construct ion in the next 30 days, and we would hope that you would be able to expedite the permit process based upon all of the background work that has already; been completed. Thank yo u for y our assistance.s i stan c e. you any questions o r ; comren$s, please �ntac myself or Mr. Dennis Do n o van of m of f i ce at (206) 872-5522. Respectfu'I l y, Thomas R. Bargnausen, P.E. Pres i dent TAB/ern C160.51 enc, As Noted cc: Mr. R. E. Beau pree Gramo`re', i nc. , Mr. Barry Cain, Gramme, inc. Mr. Jeff Metke, O'Sullivan Construction, Inc. J. Donovan Barghau Consulting Engineers, Inc, Mr. Dennis 9 sen Consulting Mr. tei#h Liden, City of Tigard ' ■ • ji e • e fir • • g 1 ••, yV' da ,'''''''' • TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 • PHONE 682-2601 e �o� I°..%. P.O. ROXIZ7 Ark \�w k 47 CENTER CT TI 1749,5— '., CITY OF TIGARD SITE —251-003 Dear Keith L±d n x This letter is to ,-clotify you that a Site Plan Review has , been c ti as s w.; for "60 Minute Tune Retail' project in #...‘Orda we with Uniform Fire Code 'Article 10 to establish required firs flow, hydrant location and street access for , fire app a,4a `�, s. I Proposal has been r evi ew d and at this time s e M no problems. A If You have ,' questions r r in this letter' or if I may he of aesletance in the futures please feel free to . b' call ma tt 682-2901. ii - ezz,e Marie Williams . Fire Prevention Orurke a • r • ( � e r I 4m ln v • ' • it , I I4 I ' . { 1 it • 1 • NOTE TO THE FILE I rROM., RE: • d I , II ` I I _ 1 , • "5 r � E • • 1 � �♦�bluwrlw� ( i I M . 1 AJr I r 1NnM ., is � , ....... � �• Ir♦x�pAww�Irin11M♦11�r� 1 1111 { .. �s...:..r,..rvry.w... v rr r• ......... ............. r,.l,.a,. �yy �r.^f • j - _ - _ a34 - �. -.. if sY ` - I A _ . , - ...... ...-, - - , _ _z..... t t..5- - -.. : K . . _J i. . . _. . r , ' i i A , , ... .. [I j : -\,_ _, _ N_, I -. r . 1 a �i ' - ! - - ' . A. _ ...... , _ . . _ ._i__.. i Au „_, ,_ _,_,__ . .,, , _..- „ __ „,__.__ __ : _ i - --- _.. a y_ - ,... ' z- �- 3 ,___ N.1 ... .,,,,,.. _ ...L.__ . , ,-.,_- - .__ .„-- ,_... --,.. ---- , _ _ _ ....,„, ,- , _ , _ , • _ ., - -- '--,•- ,-, -:- - 1 - • t _ ' _ - A _ _ -, , - = - ,,- - - '' '-. -7- -- - - - A D . - . - - -'- i. :,_ „ T..... , i .. , . ,, , _ __ .,.. , _, .. : '__ _ z ___,- -- __ _ , tli - , __ ,.- ,.,. ,f - I 6 I 3 - :i 1 1'à Y v t , } - ; ki.It'' ; -- i . i - i. - - ..-- :: y i ji - i F �_Y s Y r i .._\ x w s a it,r . . _ ,_ =� i #4. � F E S 1_1)) ^-+� T t..�: r_ s _,Y-- - -}. -� (--1,,,,.1—N41-- 2 e r#[{1j} - �' ' _ _ awe, __ - b ! -!i±,„\, t '_ _ €: t-,- 'FY. \ I mss.'' : 1Y- '`,,-,4,!--,e.: t.F V Li a s _ i ' - . O ¢� r T, . - -- , t f -- 4..i7_4-...*Q6,7# - • - ', -'-' -&1 ' -Z - ?-'-' 7,, 17_'*' 1°-:' ‘I # 1-'''s - ---- +x ; t 1 j t � N ' a e +� 1 F. Iz..1_0_ p ia. 9h,iJ l 0 1 Ott ' jD ioO � POL.E.. ° 1 44, co rs . `I: c oR A�-& pff,ii ©,J wK17 p' rt _' TIA1 �� " ° " fit, u � Lam. J �3 F��# f'. � r ALL �T PASE.5 f1'l x ro `- ,F 1,, - ffcoof �u t : �s ' 0-1 i- 1.1..8'_ LAC, qt?S 6 -- „.- _ 14-,'-`•:::: CAR. S.�QF-. `` -12.1 - -5 t3 a�E FgG F _ K #;tea. E,r`' gar Pr egg - _ . i St-1s-MTV.., ?OL �., le,, , BRQc a a T'''''/C- cr 4J& _ - _, I , t : I- • Y t I is -...rew�l+nl�.nrri:.�+:•%k.:.-a.W...a:'Ji1Y. .. ,- / .,yic:.-.z,:.°..sw:,a4,.,:.w�:,:vL:Y.V::]:.!.=J•••\':L•Y.•.af:sn:4.'4�».A.l.a.kd4: ' l::tn;, ' r,...! '.M�•Adrw.+I-..1."�'.iIAIA:4+.a:...,r '.La.r nw r r I BARRY A.CAIN GRAMORE, INC. 7 n One Lincoln.Ce tE�r,, 4 0 s !_ 10300 S.W.Gi eenbur9 Rd, (503) 245-1975 � F • Portland, OR 97223 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY � • FOR n 60 MINUTE TUNE DEVELOPMENT +t S„Wy PACIFIC HIGHWAY (99W) AND GREENBURG ROAD y. TIGARD, OREGON • I �I i i i Prepared ied for tI , `rannore Inc. 1Vil rch►, I986 0 . , EC9 t4f\p 14 1986 TI(/\RD r � t � I fEGO G \ VJLSE :•I• ' I u o 0 6 r P 1i , • '.U.iF.aH4 t w ....w..0:. w:s„_.,rruau..,..�.».,+..i'.. .r.,...f, ,, - :e., ...v V.u,.,..,....,..+ee.4. .....,e.+z w..+a.x,.aa::.- ,..a.r.a'rt- s..n,x.w•w„b._.......r,'uc.......,...,,..a.,.a.ww.4«.e. w `e' a. J 4. . n • INTRODUCTION Scope of Study This study was undertaken to analyze.ze the traffic impacts associated with the proposed ` ' • to mend; of the 60 Minute Tune retail project located at the northwest corner of S.W. deve P >~i ure 1 shows th Pacific Highway (99W) and S.W. Graeenburg Road' in (Tigard, Oregon. include:. re s his re o • ra general location of the project site. Specific issues discussed in t p , Trip 0 Tri characteristics expected fr.orl the site, for the proposed development •0 Site access location and operations. . . 0 Traffic impacts to adjacent streets. . • 0 Internal,site circulation. was prepared following the guidelines set forth in'the Oregon State Highway ' This study w P P , Division "Minimum Requirements for Traffic Reports -- Proposed Development” and discussions Isl with City of Tigard planning department. ' Project Description proposed project consists of two separate structures containing 9,100 Square feet of This prop P 1 parking spaces will be provided on the site. Three retail space. Twenty-five (25) P g P _ a s have been originally proposed for the site and will be discussed later in '' access/dri'vew yt ) f shows the proposed . this report. Figure 2 posed site plan for the property. , P the s i in th ; process of securing leases for the floor space designated ' The developer Retail/Service 'A' and 11.:1', Possible tenants include other atitorttotive-related zoning operators to compliment the 60 Minute Tune and carwash facilities. The commercial g allow other retail uses so for the purposes report "worst case condition in ,., t V does , Dees of this re ort a wo l � . P �� case's U • of site generated traffic, will be analyzed. $ The worst case condition included � 35 terms the 60 Minute Ig square feet of convenience store/specialty retail use, 2;450 square feet of t Tune retail space and 2,300 square feet of the carwash facility. E)ISTIN G CONDITIONS . Adjacent Land Uses e, . The project site presently contains a copy shop, a radio and television repair shop, a small le-family home is located at the northeast , A sin furniture shop and a vacant retail space. g • the site. Northerly across Center Street is a dress shop In a two story residence» portion of g Bank with two drive-thru Easterly across S.W, Cxreenburg Road+ landscaped , ad is a branch of the Oregon B exits': Southerly across Highway 99W is a small piece of landscaped land qcjacen•t Sheet Network S.w: Greenburg R© ad is a two way north-south local collector uniting pokt>.ons of Tigard t Portland Metzger and Progress to Main Street in Tigar''. Intersecting Highway n .i southwest y at the site under crrrisidderation� G reenbur Road is a two--way street consisting of wan 99W g g y exclusive right turn lane_.end a through tra:�fic left turn lane in both directions Highway n,. I M /..... ,.... ,.,....: ,,. .,, ..i,..», ...-x:,..-.:. ::.:..«........11.,- .:,:k.....:,,a.:.....✓�. i' w«». ._lW.w, ti«Y....W«•....w-N.r..,-+. ...+A:»a.•.Y..i..,w,waNl«.r1nW.:«Y.., ..Mw.m.«h:: .ww.i r,,....+« ` + ' c Y• (A kj, , r 99W`is a two-way east-west state highway consisting of five designated west of the a intersection with Greenburg Road and six lanes on the east of the Greenburg intersection, I. ° into ( Highway 99W has four lanes approaching the intersection from th . east with exclusive right ....• • • ' turn and left turn lanes and two through lanes. This side of the street is separated by a one foot wide concrete median. The Highway 99W approach from west has an exclusive left turn lane with two lanes for straight through and right turn movements. This street has a posted ;., ••, 40 mile per hour speed limit and parking is not permitted adjacent to the site. The ase signal '•.,•,' • described currently y Fire pre-emption con • signals. The five-phase P operation has an app intersection is second cycle. Fire pr -ed p i na s controlled signal heads are p PP s ,r : • located on the Highway 99W approaches. The traffic and pedestrian signal heads are • - mounted on mast arm supports. .l . Traffic Volumes and Peak Hour Operations - To obtain existing traffic count data on the adjacent streets, Wilsey & Ham conducted peak hour turn movement counts at the Highway 99/Green',yurg Road intersection, on Thursday, . Via.rch 6, 1986. Driveway usage count data at the present site during the rush hour was x collected on Monda;', March 10, 1986 during the p.m. peak hour. Figure 3 shows the existing p.m. peak hour traffic movements at the Highway 95vX'/Greenberg Road and Greenburg Road/Center Street intersections, From the traffic count data it was determined that the p.m. peak hour (4:25 to 5:25) would j project ' • bet icall the period of highest volumes on site.typically p g study will examine traffic operations� n the streets adjacent to the sit The. w intersection capacity analyses to be performed in study will examine P • ' :, only during the p.m peak hour. a p. peak operations at the two • The current level of service of m ealt hour traffic o erations was calculated °. ` key intersections adjacent to the site. The signalized Highway 99W/Greenberg Road ., : intersection was analyzed y utilizing the operations and design critical movement technique . described in the Transportation Research Circular No 212, Interim Materials on; Highway, 2l2 Inte ' _Capacity, The stop sign controlled Greenbur g Road/Center Street intersection operations were analyzed using the CAPCALC microcomputer software developed by Roger Creighton Associates,Inc. ••' .rhe. existing p.m, peak hour level of service at the Highway 99W/Greenberg Road intersection is 'D', with a corresponding volume to capacity ratio of 0.81. The north and south approaches of Greenburg Road currently operates at level of service IA', while the Center Street approaches operate at level of service 'D' during the p.m. peak hour, • (Capacity analysis worksheets are included at the back of this report) Level of services for a particular roadway or intersection is a qualitative measure of various a .a ' factors which influence traffic operations. The factor which influence the traffic operations include speed,, travel time, traffic interu tions freedom to rnaheuver, driver s and • �7 •' P � � � j I,; , . ' comfort, safety and vehicle operating costs. Six levels of service have been established an a- are designated to the letters A through 5, providing the best to worst service in terms of a,.°;; driver satisfaction. For signalized intersections, the level of service is generally evaluated I , e,�•1-:. ill terms of an equivalent range of a quantitative measure, the volume/capacity (v/c) ratio: The level of service Do with a corresponding v/c ratio range of 0.8 0.9, is the desired level of service for design by ODOT and the City of Tigard. Eor unsignal ed intersections, the r,� t' , } ...„ level of service is evaluated in terms of reserved capacity at each approach to the ;. intersection. The level of service E, with a corresponding reserve capacity 0 to 10 vehicles is acceptable for the minor street approaches, if signal warrant conditions are not met I{,15, .Al j''et ,1,,'l ,.4 f, 1A{, ,t. ,,,,,,,, 'S". i d, tl ,, r.}, t., r / ,, } ..', M tr.,,e,,..i, J -,', .. 'I , a' I I Y I I jr +.Y.r arac. ...,....,:mal:w.,a.wd•l+c.!.,4iM•+.%n`.i.:...°C:u:.i,tuw 4.nw..- ..«Xv ... - • • J. a n..a«-IY.....,.,-..A...., ... • i....r+�A,..,ti.x w.a-..a.t'.:, u+r,ar.w..:.M._.,..,cwa..a..c...,,san•««,,,w.c.,..rww.,a:lew «.-..s•a.au.++,.u...._=.r.:ll w•w..,.,w,.. .. - ,+4 r+w.._„:l.;.wt .:;ow w ,• Transit Tri-Met busline numbers 5 and 77 serve the site every 15-30 minutes during weekdays. These lines provide transportation to downtown Portland and Lake Oswego. , FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .. Due to the existing intensity of development in the vicinity of the project site, no major changes in the traffic characteristics along, Highway 99W and Greenburg Road is . anticipated. Historically, traffic volumes on Highway 99W has grown annually at a rate of about 2 percent. The proposed project is scheduled to be completed by early summer of this ' year and the existing businesses will be closed as soon`as construction begins. For the purposes of this report, the existing peak hour volumes will be used as the base case .,, • , volumes. Site-Generated Traffic Forecasts The Institute of Transportation Engineers :Trip Generation Repor Third Edition code numbers 8 4 (Specialty Retail iCen�� in8eers , P , y ) 846 (Car Wash) and 851 (Convenience Market) were ,l ( P � . used to estimate the average weekday peak hour trip-ends to be generated by the proposed development. The trip,generation characteristics for the 60 Minute Tune facility were not available from the ITE report,'so the generation rates used in this report are based on count data from an existing 60 Minute Tune facility in Vancouver, Washington. Table I shows the gross number of p.m. peak hour trips that are expected to be generated by • twra development mixes of possible tenants. As previously discussed, this study will examine a "worst case” condition in terms of the site-generated traffic volumes. The development study since the convenience market use . � a during ten remainder phis is expected to generate abo mix� �! be utilized dur�about n (10) times r any trips as a specialty retail or automotive mix /� will b retail store. g 1 • Table 1 also shows the significant amount of the site generated traffic that would be attracted from the existing traffic flows passing the site. According to the ITE Report 45% of the convenience market trips and 58% of the car w ' trips rips woUld be comprised of ,. wash l: motorists already on Highway 99W and Greenburg Road. d. • • r.' r , [rr ��: ...,rt,, r .h... , „. ta ,t Hlt.i9 r I 1 , ..lu r+r. I ..M.v i ,.,:.!Y.+t._.4.+«+.Jy N wx, :4:. wJki.a.l-J-..wJ.n.1W-1-i.u..t Y 5-:!alwwvur•....;vaWr+ v a.„w« n...r<.,l.. i., ..•.-v-,-.+r•».1-i ..,.AS4 CL.xwFw.l-.-.i..+ c:: A • !w ' tl Hw...yx.+-.nw.. ...-.*, _•: .... ... ....w.• .r.l1R...wr.. r. .., -..n , • . TABLE ! 60 MINUTE TURN DEVELOPMENT -TIO1A.RD . TRIP GENERATION • . PM PEAK 1-101.11Z TRIPS .. LAND USE SIZE(GSF) E ) GR OS S DIVERTED NET IN OUT" IN OUT IN OUT ,• I DEVELOPMENT MI?C A . 1. 60 Minute Tune 1,210 3 3 3 3 a.. r 1 2. Car Wash 2,100 55 55 32 32 23 23 3. Convenience Market 2,250 52 52 23 23 29, 29 • 4. Specialty Retail 2,100 5 5 :� 5 r..'S Total 7,660 115 115 60 . T 55 55 60 6 • D14 VELOP MENT MIX'1 1. 60 Minute Tune 1 ,210 3 3 - 3 3 2. . Ccer Wash 2,100 .55 55 32 32 23 23 5 3« Specialty Retail 4_,L„11,5_0_ 12 12 3 1 9 99 Total 7,660 70 70 35 35 35 35 Notes: 1. GSF = Gross square feet of building 2. Source: ITE Trip Generation Report, Third Edition The site generated trips were distributed to the surrounding area using the following general directional distribution : North - 30% South w 2O% East - 3400 : West 1- 169 nal distribution is based on population estimates developed by METRO and the dl ect�.o p This r � p percentage of passing traffic volumes on the adjacent y d }cent street Stein n sw • Al-ternative Site Access Plans yi Two alternative site access plans have been examined to identify traffic impacts of the Access Plan I consists driveway ••• proposed }:ions and turn movements �i develoj�merit. +sts of' the dr�vewa locations g turn movements into'... and out of the allowed as sho�Jn in � ure 2. Observations of the tur existing site development, which closely match the movements allowed in Access Plan 1, indicate the following: No left turns were made out of the Highway 99W or Greenberg; Road driveways r ' during the .m. peak high opposing traffic and , g p• p period due to the high �iolurne lof { •r limited gaps. • , ' .0 % f .,;1 . .@; .+ ,.J.t p .. � .. J t.7 ' ,. '1 ,i. ..t,, t� ' ( w,•:a ,E. ..... -iti t ei,xA« ..�J• : 1,.nY ¢Yw`.1..,{.t lNL 1.. .: tl'....c, .,.A� ...... ....'q«.1 P.h.la.tiar4t •r 1G, •,,. ,t. ,, . I I • I I i r . >•r i r7 µ. .: About ten (10) vehicles used the site as a by-pass to the left turn movement at the Highway 99W/Greenburg intersection. ' g access driveway.Ir� . Only one vehicle exited the site from the Greenburg Road acc y • No vehicles turned left into the site from Greenburg Road, ' Due to these existing motorist tendencies, Access Plan 2 was developed to improve v e p otential` a conflict areas. Access Plan 2 has the same. driveway locations and configurations on the . , Center Street and Highway 99W sides as Access Plan 1. However, the Greenburg Road .', driveway has been modified to be a right turn, in only driveway. A right turn in driveway on. . . g y Greenburg Road allows customers to enter at the front of the buildings without having to go through the Highway 99W/Greenburg intersection. The site gen and trips were assigned to the site driveways (Access Plan 2) a d the adjacent intersections as shown in Figure 4. Figure 5 illustrates the total traffic volumes at I• the adjacent intersections with the proposed development. Traffic Operations Analysis • p.m. peak hour operations, with the total traffic volumes, at the Highway , The , 99W/Greenburg Road and Greenburg Road/Center Street intersections were analysed using the intersection capacity techniques previously di;,cussed. The Highway 99W Greenburg Road intersection would continue to operate at a level of service 'D' with a corresponding •` • v/c of 0.88. The Greenburg Road/Center Street intersection is expected to operate at level pP the of service At for the north and south approaches, '�' for the west approach and °E' for t'n east approach The weighted average level of service intersection would remain at . , � weighted rvlce for the inte 'At. A traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted for this intersection, but current plus ' site-generated traffic volumes do not meet the minimum volume requirements to warrant signalization,. Review of Site Plan and On-Site Circulation Access Plan 1' the original site plan, was examined to identif y potential traffic impacts. ' The visual barrier of the retail space/60 Minute Tune building will minimize the number of ^ :,,i by-pass trips currently using the existing site. Motorists coming from the east and south The two existing will:.' continue to use, almost exclusively, the Highway 99W driveways g driveways will be consolidated into a single driveway about 200 feet west of Greenburg Road. This driveway will be used by motorists coming from the west. The existing left turn • ga bay +- i p' g will ge for the vehicles entering the site from the west. t• •', storage ba �ir� In will rov�de storage , ,. .A (About one vehicle every two minutes.) ' ,' The Center Street driveway will be relocated easterly t∎•� about 40 feet west of Greenburg . amount of traffic on Center Street should not is to the left radian ' -� Road. `The. light p movements into the g ,;� The relocation also minimizes the impacts g site. The reloca limitatioi s to the site. ' The proposed curbing shown in Greenburg road to prohibit left turn movements into and out of the site is not a desirable solution. This type of median barrier curb would probably become more of a traffic hazard than safety feature for the following reasons: The narrowness of this curb is not a typical median installation. Motorists do expect a small curb be in the middle of the street. Also,, ty of not p b to o visibility such a small obstacle at night may be a hazard. '' .''Q:c,. �«ixf.n .U,rd l.:���A r.r-+riTr d r'f'.. � .X x h 1.? } .1 r t' •�+i � �� `� Y , w i I � f i - a v'. '1 ....w—+»..ur..w.,,:«..--A..;:{r'+i••,...a'.:rr.liJar.:.yalal..iF':.+.w ..r , +4.M-4.=L.:tu:r,:.:-.r�r;.4a::.e.'k.isa::.11::'l afr.1.`.....sw;%.W�...va,vwltafs,A• >.�uvuqt'..i:ut+».:H..u+..A.yivl—:r:»nL .;4-»a•e +• , -•• The curb restricts bus and large truck turning movements onto Greenberg Road. i • , • To eliminate the potential hazard created by the median curb in Greenburg Road and to minimize turn movement conflicts at the Greenburg Road access driveway, Access Plan 2 was developed. Access Plan 2 differs from the original site plan in its modification to the { Greenburg Road access driveway. This driveway would be designed as a right turn in ,' driveway. Figure 6 illustrates the geometric design of the proposed Greenburg Road access •' • driveway :to accommodate only right turn in movements. Also, modifications to the • surrounding the existing 'traffic signal span wire pole are shown on ; proposed concrete island sur I ' • Figure 6. { ' CON CONCLUSIONS . I proposed development will not adversely • ` The traffic generated by the prop 60 Minute Tune p ." 'rw• impact the traffic operations of the adjacent street system. By consolidating the existing two Highway 99W driveways into a single driveway, eliminating the turn movements out of ►' the site along Greenburg Road and minimizing the convenience of using the site as an illegal }i ,• • "left turn" by-pass route, the redevelopment of the site will reduce vehicle conflicts in the- area. The p.m, peak hour operations at full development worst case" condiL.ioi rs is expected . tics be within the acceptable level of service limits at both the Pacific Highway (99TV)/Greenburg Road and Greenburg/Center Street intersections. ft r I • •. • I I r I ii ' C I I • o- •r r I I •I .. t • W iL EY J IAM I I ' . 215T Se "TH str, r :a "'ma r S T AV _ li 0 � , i MuMI Gub If ?:i F ,`� '• P •IW-.P HUHi CtG�J _II. p Iiu Y'- r c• .....� p T:IS W ;' h. ,' R a ,1•.�.'' CAES VOOD CltEE11YO0O YD T tli� -• "4 " sW "'- ALDER + oAVIL r � OBt III .JUAN••APL -., 1� '. ';f pO r 444 " i HoWE5TEA+ ••- o.N Gow.m ' _ GAEENPV�D As 4 SW CA to hE6t' lrll ii r CP i O) LESLIE I,• 7 w Nq ' �I• pD i Iron r.°�.i, MAVER'M)00 CI U` •O .r PZSLfE �- IN �O'tir J ~ r G�CER C7"' :t UCKtAWD00 CT I : t - WJITI i-sr,- roMel''. HACKAIdOEIE a• i 11,7 -, I• r9or , "a' wA1!_ q«`� a • r � 1 Q iIRCN RIRGI £..• i 1 . KINGLET r m�;rt an/n1.„y 0 ctD:111 d" V. 9. '4L R oq x � ST WALNUT�y, ii6 L ..R, •'10' '"'mow' i I in . f.L 6T. , ulu ,•n ' '• i R I WHIDE C1Lo, to Gt `:W fP • co ST DA C •- A^ VENTURA At It r. %3 "T" ,, r.HESro DR t LOCUST s . 11i1:�INil7 f• PERCHEno11 LN` r, ` ••� ®_ . • 4 IuastAca��+� , ` �® Ym•U411tE a1iw. W � , �Ly, r J s 1~ Oditx M:,,_ s > couu vEEUIO-:¢ , r �0 a .... C' 'w {�a W ? I CoRIMUCKE ER n. a °/�K 81 . u+ • -- AV. •'•uK UAxEiJIs.. '...." r ° , H•... ��� '" 11" SGNA taillt s� ►,uckr` L°"14 THOA'q =rf W ,� I ;;Orr, ., � 1 M•c) J� � , ■ r, � r � SUAtItEA r` I') � ,, '•��, 3 IE � r .KM j,...I✓.', , � c LILY 41 4,` I •it4a S a x� '4 ; A•• LE.ST.' 7 ATIUNTJ /1,U J �•'I-SU-KLH•• CRES � ��. I • q 5Uldt�tf,'CHEST ri i P I LEWIS t TANGE . ;,,I ii « 4u KATH�RIN (, n V III '■ 1d7 r,r�rn r uat'No FALCUN x 0 Y- Plit',s ° 1HERI , 4 ; - �, r Ntl',4�, f sk, ; � PROJECT SITE,. Q` ,IMNEY - � � r ""�" b `.,, n•G � ,, y.F ��/•'Zk M.xw,'.;y, HEAAIO!:AWA. • w . k�R`• ..,, cT - ,� .'; 1 .r� � rN �" .......-Pit YxLI' • _ P �r dy B.r• w T "Ehhol ST' �.•• ac y1 J•�I-' '� - ,•,,. ' S. wMNUT ST x i ^4•k'<"' '9Q , r I L:Y..•MNTIE r • A`, b 'c..f.�4.tWe • ,0 -tan 0' e r , --��.,r - -,MT .••.._r FONNEN.1 ''s n , a I'� F , . / 96A ,INS I I C�a r• 41 '', I sw ALa1ERTA FONNER sr V,4-n T H p, 4,° M,} CSEtINt 4•I' P ( 4l 3 VRYS S JAMES htl Ww a UAANHt W FIR \`p •.y . w C ithA A6l.lt LN iMg t'( j .." :Ia= I .'S!tNUQ LN 4 r .''• ' rj: --741 'IE4zA 5 tIt9' ''vv sT d post ARDE ' b i , U r)0 11:,2A1-0 sr .rl . • , HIGH tlA Du —� ., C:1 otuu Ikw u a' p+b.' VIE 1 O1 . M EAR I t• x ,.,.,.+_.-.. K "to _1 in,,,.'.. n 1.— :/ ;aDot'1.l I. y,. M y r GT r 1 r ..' — talc� � � b1n a � Q d r y A i e) .1 t LEaE yi 4 v �j (_ . :. . . . . ,• ,. 0 o , - . DLt ' 4 yM..P / T r I ,YS K I g '-�' I i' in , r 1 Dik Ad tHet 7 '.gyp h• w '1; ,, ..f� --` r, It 1 s ,- s p op .r,��,� �,� �r • ) �F� �c . , iMIHi4 r: 0 �4r y"r lips 1S ,!e# of hficr ...J 1 •• i : l J ,>Md V v� d EitVKito �� cr E '' �y 914 •. t 4 •1 iI` l.. w �. ' - 4 IIR' N•' , RD 1' r yKRIq y, . llr-tI-IAA , , ;of RU K � e .. -+--,,. ' yK IIKL bERf C� - J •�r,,r- w �„ I Lo I ,,rr,/ P . •s L � Uil ` �, i ,,,,,,,,.1I,` };,a r. „ ^,..J.,,,, s r'-'r ,,,-. r,„ /i + r ,„.., ,, r.e ' i, •• \vI.uJ 11JYr&I MI . a • ..� .. ........n:..�.- ._u.w:: « e •x ..n..w m. .-....ww♦.r<.w::: w.r.+.s I i i ll:'t/ u!/ \ :N1L I 1II1 1 \•1\I11 III 1\v',� \t 1. 1 •, . ;, n)Il•r ,1 ',1' \ 1111111.1111 11\ �� `°. ,' .,1 bi :,1-•I, y ' 1.IIY ,111,,1 �,� �3`' .✓� su r, .11(,,p1.,,='''..... ♦1:s.,„l»i,L,111ait ii tt 11 ill! — - , ` ` 'y .» .—• 11111111i:.�- _. � � ... ,. t ��I1111111 IA.., N ' EP$•�++,r r 0 • • IIIIIIII ` EWr� v i fi ° III I I1 1 + 1, , �.,„ zi� w .. 111 lit 1, I t«\ 7, X`° R .'.:.i.-it,' i.ra ill r �A 1 I I . I �. - .• 1 1111 ,• ,j.,1 ,, �, Ii 11I i 1< g Fj: / r' 1111 .,' .,-' w' „"' if\ .....1. •� :s1/;,,,.6 - 1 ® ig'� ii11I1.. -..1.__...,....q0-,..,,,.... . . 1._.:..•. �, ,,s.,...;1,,,,,,,..,0 it, 'U 4 _. k:.;. . 4• I. �1 1'm+. III . •, .��'♦ r'�' fa � \ •1p i .:4• IA . , i N I 1' "(-_6" , ` ,\'' F' dq (;W. /I'd 1....''.' ,..t c, 3-.),q .,` \ ;.- 7-7.:,:,., , , , 1: ' „?.,iti :. . . . I . 1 il F 1 ''., °•\.. ;14\ f+ . ' �''� 'r p ''''' '`'”-I 'I 1111114‘'\. 10,‘% ...:....:.,. .0 '...':'`'. „,%."'"'sti. • , .' p� d 1 � r mo ° a ` ; , h• \ , : ` s / A �. M i r / , I// ti\ •• :_...R .;.-i.` _1, ,�._ a1 d gA .r1r " Ra`1 yC 0 /„ 1 1ddAR: Rjb� ji S°tai , d t , �. + 5p 1140 ` 5..•,. +tpy'YMt!t• '_R = ✓ 1' . /r a �..} vv ��:x�g�lY !II y �� .,1 , Y :4M}I i4 a kG w4. 1111." 1 ba"M "u.it ' h 1� ., e1 i u wp a��� qty " ' pp 'q' E tr d rr o , ...• ',ii . , . . ' • ,• I i"`.","" Bad ti.a ti t .. .a I �E,U'A. w PNIyl I/1 SITE"+Dr^Ei V ELOpfJ,ENT+•l F?.Le +AN I . ■ w«, oh fthhg Eh ifleeu @hca o t , qo a4I14,11J E AE TIIL ffl weor ,,, .1 i tAi++.1 ri,,minli,SW , d .ring' klkii : top,ud tX+Krn 97223 , 1 ._. — tab 1.....N,�,.n w,u:...+,M+a Ila W u ^ ,,_ C:. FIGUR 2. SITE PLAN r r I R Ja.'IJ ,i4..!' ? ,';‘I {.I, ,lit'''IIV ,d' .> 1..11y :t t ,.1•:•I.,rt..ti If1.,V+' f'.111 ,1♦, x..' .1'... . ,I . .. Iq ....,,1"1 ■ 7:1.x ' 'I 11 1. 1 I , • • I , 1. .1.1..1 , a , , '' r .. , ■, , f , , I ti - ,..;,r....:,..a,...:.:w..+Lx" .�wu r.,�. qtr".ua..N.•- �tu:'h ,k rM\...J.. »....,,• r....,,.-aM.....,.�.....,1...4...+,....,.;�... ..�r.-�_.. ,N.,, ...,.r.., _.,ac-.,.ra,.w......•.•....w..,•.a.:..,�:.M-«..w F-. .ivauu . • • r I N. • Ic • CENTER ST. k }(• 7 1O 0 0 U � Y i f • 1 W • is . { I 2 ' I HWY. 99 W. i r • '1, I : r I w , r I J , • •'1 I I I I EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES (IN PASSCEI� CAR EQUIVALENTS) I I , • I '• N1r /{ .',k .,. 1� I' r_, `.0 .n.F I ,A I.l +.. 1'Id# . ` .i...r.4-.r--«ai....M..W« r.nwAr..`-r�«..k:.r+,...,..H....,.11+.::..+•y...,...,..'.«wA...w�`..t.rv."+. .utF.tix.Fh—x«...w.�1t...«.JLN-�(s[F,. `1 N� cr � • • • CENTER ST.' • I � ; • . I 7 I 4N I jt , U a 6 Y, 99 W. • . 7I FIGURE 4 a SITE GENE ATED "RAF. VOLUMES I , . 4. .44 .4.x!•• • ., °4 � � J 5 1 t I w ,V. N 1 ' 1 1 CEN TER ST '. s i - /0 0 • t:‘,) p d • as 4 C I � P 2�0 . W , ltr �`J 1 • EICIIJRE 5: TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/DEVELOPM NT (CONVENIENT MARKET) • IS• M • . � r • 'i: it . i .::.....w. .._r•;a...+..!-.w..»...1:.-..�a.,x.•A rr-nwwA�........:-.�-:.«A r..r ,r....:_. ...,.... .+an..u.�.:J:..aw.w»�.M.u.s.._N.,a.4�.u:.w':]+,..wf1..�u...........,..w .,-: w.WUU.a.:J.�Jaw:J..+�..•..li. a.t.!-� kv.aN«xw..,.«•,. '. " . I rr4LL11.'1..1�.�1ut1. \ Lti'''' PAR A \ ThWERPO/ TO BE RELOCa "--. C ,;t:', ____---- .uY P G .• *, . „•' • ■ . ,. ..L.....,...,,,•'.,,,,V / . .,•'',.'1.0111111( ' 1 ' 4) ' ' ' '.' ' ' ' • v •-, �. i • \# I,• / -4111111111k. ' / , NEW SIDEWar LY 2:\T .//' .. J 1. F {; A C PAVIN �\ •1 Y ' • n4' r,+ i ` wra .. il, '`.. : -�.,,,, . .,�• DEDrLIsP:a..,. n.•n W ': ' - C ROVIDED T\.' CIT.'.. , , , . . , . , . .• , , .. „ ..., ,.. 7 N a J, \__,K+ t,...`r,.• . ,,,, ••. , ,_.., '\,' Q ''''. 2.5' L.A.1\1DSpr-(1. ' '.:* •.. : �` . .ii:;- /I CURB Al\IJ SID1 r• „ . . \l \ 1 •: •• \ , ..,„, , , ,. • � . �,., ti!J •.-.'. 1�, 'r ^ . •, ,,.,0.j i ,, ... , �✓ � \ + ,,: may,. : ,1, `e16'l' y tl,s 1 \ ,is, x �j • • I . x a 1. • \ .6',.5"' - ''eZ". '. * ' ' ' .‘ k ' '' , S' M ?'', ;•' • t 1.,'''''-' .* ' '. i' ,,, l 1 j��+ ' : . • • ' 1.r TRIP 2 r ' ' •` • .7.' LL • �,, ' r 1 ii• i ' ,'-°7---' , ' '1/4-. ...e._____ ..-.'A• ,i'' ' FIGURE 6, RECOMME` ILDED SITE PLAIT—MODIFICATIONS ';•` • .. , ,,,,,. i.',41;!,,,:‘4.4.,!..,!,,;:',',.,..,:.1.' •,>•t u Ir)x°X4.4 .!, �a J NI ,:A, ;{r. A;, -,,_ Jw H,, .t� (, 'r r .J. ,• ;Jt. ,.K:,..',,',.,..:!'...,'1,1,!,.!;',, r,. ... ' • i Jl L-r'EY�A;.714 I iM .• 1 . 1 1 , r p• , , . .Critical Movement Analysis.: OPERATIONS AND DESIGN '• L. alculation Form' . I• P ° r .- c-AQ6�wA T: 111,7 c. JFi ' 'f ° 1' m."P .1‹ f, ,t„� � �s i �! P • ' Problem State ent Ida 1;tit I� Identify Lane Geometry Step 5. Develop Passenger Car • Step 8. Step 9a. " St Approach 3 Volumes (PCV) Eta pch� Calculate ' ? Approach 3 Lane 'ts ' ,. �► `-- RT_ 2 is .�djustfe lurne Volumes t ' 1,,,Lttpt� NvJI4 (aWb) m :- - Total Adjusted No. PCV • If a l , t4tove- PCV PCV of per .... �°°°- c� 1- i E-- LT= ' want (Step T) tJ W((tixWx PCV. U..ancs Lane •' la r1 4""` R1 315 1 30 t1 t Q r EsZ l -•---)" a o , 1 `12 S 2 46,s 4 ra r." a A�2 IJ 2 668 , . . . i A r z 1 2 G ,. .. I-i° 2 , 1,3 ' Ii3C) 1 18o Approach 4 LT= � Step f.) ._o_. Y - l a r1. or s Ti-i- s _ q li a ja�t1 �'de1r�� . RT_ '. fill() in i�+ h PV i Hourly Volumes ��s �; tit � 0 Approach 3 Approach 4 .,a 1- ac f��+,Iv% !tom ,. ' ,,,,,, 205 a m �:L n TH to\t8Q Step 6. Calkulate'Peraod Ealu s 'Sep 9b..�� •' r= L6/� Volume.�d aastrrxent for 1. ,• W u If (PI!) in eb Mzdl " Jzuse Signal Overlap , ...................J ¢ 1. _ C7 Possible'' , z J LB- �? LT= �� � ,� Apprpch 3 PHF c Critical G:mr over Adjusted Volume _".~ - Probabl cal =2 67 Phase Volume to next Volume • rY b--v c (�fii .� FIT in pch phase in pcii ,• T= (.)ra o n1 If II a TH = a' u- I 0(BL) 315-190(8►`} 1Qi0 c, ' - 2 x �i LT_ 31 13I?2. n ¢ H ! g LR=_ �. Rz z 1 (25 62,t 6,1O-IZ5(n) C� . LT= 00 T' In 0.. U - Pet,ikz. s a\Z) 5ii5 Ty= $09 C N 48 to a y U f1 fl a' A t�'"r v i ." 21 G t�T= 1�_ b 1 L1 g. approach H p 3. Identify Phasing 5 e PNF= t7'gC7� ç--- Ai-9n I9 n - 01 A3�, L r _..,�. �►1 k2 ,4I ►2 D E j ► A�..4-A4 f TH 61'2 rL 1 z Step 1 a.'Szirr .f Conical RT'= 1b. �>3x �� 1��4 Ppraach aT�. ~ 'Voltunes . ' Step 7. Turn Adjustraments --. - -.-+— -----+ I.r r , . 133' 1 h Step 4. Left Tarn Check Apprdaoh Ste 1r, I @ersectir n Level o • pP f /� rdach tviovCmdtrlt '`� f 2 3 4 �. ,�'1 "R-k�r�' t ; Service Turn B Number to _ (comport p th Table 6) • change intervals Tum voinme Ste '10 wi ., t-EPth.G., rata, (PV from Step 6) °t'b•E- 1 to Left turn capacity i .. I IG 1 hour t'�b� ��' i on change interval, - Oppds ng vol,in t " in v h �IhS-O O Et, vph trcirri Step 2 'off . ' c,G/C 1 Ped.volt hour 12 raatia .tep °� ,.Re�carcuiate LET -vt)c& p b LT frdm PP ` s..' •; ct,Qppoxing vdltattte Table.3 tredmetric Chan�aw in yph Left ttarn P� t, r.�l LT vol.in pch 0ti4 l c Signal Change '. ecity o P FOL)),S 1"C' 1Irt1't� F' ` PCE ki'1'from a r ft turn v � Table 4 � Volume Change fo'Xib'opacity in vph R7 val.In pch � ' e. ) 1hs -t‘ Tli vdl.in pch ommmllenL$ . ' g.'�"cft turn vblittiie from 5ie 6 p Total PCV itt pch -- ' h,li valltate S capasww 4 � w it)!(8>I)7 a . ..:.. .... r.r Ati, .• y M • W I LSEY °t HAM _ F'ORTLAND, OR CON DI N GFluc>NITF'M86 G , EXIST�Iy g6 , /11 ` GREENSURG I,OAD GREENBURG ROAD CENTER STREET CENTER STREET ., AVERAGE WEEKDAY , • .. s•.DAY FM FEAE•'. i�G6' VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LANES ' TRAFFIC LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 EFOM L SR L S R L S R L S R NORTH 70 1 530 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 C) 0 `f 0 0 C) , _ 0 C) C) Cl 0 t f 7 EAST .4 0 14 , 1 0 460 60 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , . SOUTH t:f c:f t:3 �, WEST 10 5 10 0 0 0 0 Cf UNSIGNAILIZED !' '. TFAFM T C LANE 7 LANE 4 , , FROM LANE 1 LANE '1 NORTH RESERVE CAPACITY 625 } , LEVEL or SERV 1 CE A E; l.bS' u.►Ei6, c'E'a A (• EAST RESERVE CAPACITY 104 D _ z.5 ( ' SERVICE Gv5 1.— +4•,� )+I• 'li ` LEVEL OF SOUTH RESERVE CAPAC I TY 67'` 1 Z9S + Ib-h 2�1`,'� , k .. LEVEL OF SERVICE A 587 r, ,.. 1 WEST RESERVE CAPACITY _4 1 1 LEVEL OP SERVICE 1 •.i C r ,• 1'1A�t�R STREET' NORTH/SOUTH i Y F i 1'r 4n, t .. Critical Movement,.Analysis: OPERATIONS AND DESIGN ale ulation Fora 2 ' .. . Ril • , I e _I rsecuon s;u,)•P .c tFtC. t161Au,�A`l (9`tua GSa uc�G. 4 a1b Design Hour "(:),I .PEA.K. ' f'! Problem Statement . ' Identify Lane Geometry Step 5. Develop Passenger Car Step 8. Step 9a. . I. .Id'e ,P I Step�' fY Geometry . • N V Approach I Volumes (PCV) in,pch Calculate 3 Approach 3 Late • °, tnl t1y to i RT zoo _ Adjusted Volumes Vollumes'SI°V, v �WK I F° TH= IZV: 1�'otal Adjusted Na V L _e'?!.) n !, II Pv r�+r PCV pGV of, per • k..,... LT.....Z./.1.5_, me ri_► (Step 7) U W .(tJxlhlx P£t,J Lanes Lane ' +--.-� 2 r t I5 I 3(S '',, a ---.4.' '' g 1,2•.. 190 110 . 1 g;$ ir , i—p. a A 1 IZG 7� 4(0B Q _ Approach 4 LT=_ 1-1Cy UI(� © 3�a t I;80 . Step 2. 'Identify Hourly Volumes TRHT=- ID il it LA__ lq,5 t 1 1' =,,, 1....f liV) in vela .a tz" Approach 4 Approach 3 1L)ME AT lIrAS� ItlS F�TDg on.. y411•. FIT= W5 ----- T 1.5ai. •rH t2os Step 6. Calculate Period Volumes Step 9b Volume A adjustment for w (PV) in ch Multiphase Signal Overlap , LB- Possible VOIMtme Adjt sted l ---- Approach 3 pM�F,= a,9 Probable Cratica�l Carryover Critie ! 1 T=2,h°M' .� � 00 11 Ls V . 35 se Volume to next Volume 5 ciI rf _ RT in pch phase in Bch ' Ll '= ,$7� o �i, n u u T1-1_ .� �15� n+ ESt i?. u+ F. >•- 1 BZ lad t~&x� I� ( ) 1� a. �J Q 9, ,`+1 t ((Az ZG... ...' � �'. .eeu�wY _ .. I � �{.r B� 1 Z5�80� `�/R�^I��7 q � ( � �° LT=_ lib T 5,h�io 0 o © ,,■ c7 _ N o ' TH.... LB= m _' o m htl 0cZ. �aSi�•�1-� - '55s 1O a a ~. ... RI- '� a a , Arpproach 4 ' . - cc < < A3�A' 3SQ — S$b''• Step 3. Ideratlfy Phasing s ( pHF= a o B3 195 tai •--�°1r Ili ea k't°"1 AtZ Al- 3 LT • _ 125 . . ......0 A�„�w-A�+ '� TH ____.___ � J il~ � .� , ' f rI�FCi�fl , ,�. I••• Ste �Q. Sum � C' I . • -� AI$2, Nt !' 5' .___,_. pp roach c- Voiwn R Its _ r J Step 7 darn. adjt trments 9 ' ;Step 4. Left..Turn Check Arlirotteh .__._..._... ._. - , _. 'n er�sectioi Level o ,approach Step 1. • 2 3 4 Turn '51~P t F.� 4 'omServic d with i, • �.htiumber of � c p p th'`Pablr 6�) change intervals 'Turn volume . per hour (pv from Step 6) P t7Pl a `1~, • 1 M capacity SE.R4, '∎Ta , b, t tuba ca Opposing val.in` 't,,° 0 _,___-_- on cha4 ;;it�teRval, vph from step x c,it,Glc C t' Fed.vol/hotfr �C Seep .1. . '. ectxlculate Plant) PC8 LT from d.Cfppasin volume L FT 'TUR�'s ble J P 6(..I T1 .► ometric Change-,—,...—................41, lnvph Ta w . "IA turn PC vol”iti h LT Signal(`her. . ,,.. Pt ,S wES ��, 8 tiT from •u l� A`C 'fabled G Va.2_ C,9ange _.....,,,, � .�. tnv ph F � '�ttn torn' I.1b � l L5 �R�T � CI, ; ityiir, v li FIT vol.Irt pelt l .._,..__._.a b+e d C.�tc TH vet, G� Ei Es g.i.,eft turn voiurr I tram ate 6 h.in v�u Tutat I00v in pt it _... ....- I ,r� " r ... ...u .. -...v, 4 a wwad..-t..•r+.+ri a....c}:i.a.rr:w v µr • ?: HAN `—" F'Op',TLAN1 , OP WrCLSL`{ 60 MINUTE TUNE FJEVkLOF'IviEINIT GF INICNTF'B60 C,I tC ?I+.IL4lJI G ROAIJ SPEE'NEsi.JF.G POAD 3/11/56 CENTER STREET CSINNTER STREET r r AVt='hAC WEEKDAY PM PEAK } E36 • VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LA • • i TRAFFIC IC LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 l=F401Y1 L S L S Cam; L S 174, G Ft • �,.. . .% NORTH 70 ,930 10 0 0 0 o (:) 0 c) 0 C) EAST 40 1t.) 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ct 0 0 V SOUTH 10 460 60 0 0 0 t:) c:) c;) t) (:) W t : : 0 0 0 i UNSIw,4AL.IZED • TRAFF=I C FROM LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 NORTH, RESERVE CA 'AC;1TY s � L LVEL or EEFNYIC5 A oe,G0,,,, AV l2.AAE„ La EAST RESERVE CAF=AG I LEVEL OF SERV ICC E ..._:_. txts s�o 110 • . i SOUTH RESERVE CA•'ACZTY 670 ' LEVEL OF SERVICE I 27g � 4- 13 WEST RESERVE 161 • " LEVEL OF r"a5hVICC ID S(A y '�..j.. MAJON+ STREET 'INIORTH/SOUTH � I r I . e • r f { ..'fir . , I, , _ " is ,.p..�w.w Lt ..»..a4.+.s.a'.c..;x.ru.a.a...n..lari ...".w:...::...+i...--..-,.;.1::.-wa...,SU,t-X:-,e..u:,.,u...,:az.a,w.3.ao.,'-i.M..-.vex.iu':w 9.a..w....P,�k;aLLU-4+....,Y.s.�u. -....fi wu-s++o.k«...mot.'•.. ,. isilrw-va,.r..:..:a".lsvw-...5....titR.»n»+WLI.I,":wr.a..wx u.."�+.wr,-moN.;uvvJr.-a... k tl 4. ,.c.,,,,,,,,,,141` 1.,.dxc. P an\^e Y4.I# 1 Electric VoY ■ny ', ' ,''' ,, . . , , i ..,,,,,,,,,,.. . . ,... ,:, March 10, 1986 , ..o fi n Thomas A. Barghausen, P.E. , President ,- A Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. . 6625 S 190th, `102 , Kent WA 98032 Your Letter To Me Of March 5, 19$6 Regarding Your Job #1898 Enclosed is drawin our revised Y drawing with my preferred pole locations. 1 ' GTE pole #5063 on Center Street may be moved into the future planter area. What is the schedule for the sidewalk? : a. GTE pole #5062 should be located the � r ' #5062 in the planter area close to the whpelc :�7.' tamp rather than at the tangent curb return. If out pole were installed at ,. the curb return, our line to the northeast on Center Street would overhang . the existing building. The new pole installed, neat the driveway would need an anchor in line with • thic pole and Our pole #5062 located about 15 feet from , , the new pole. II anchor must be �'. P The arc Lee terry, f GTE i i g 'J fle will supply . n Ti and in with Y g you with their charges for moving the poles: this ob. g is working me on Please call me if you have any questions. ' Sincerely: ' d �k Thom son p Supervisor, Special Projects Engineering Western Division ►: (503) 643 5454•, Ext 232 ' JAT/sa5E9 G i. Enclbsure " . Craig g tuck Keith Liden Lee Berry a I Wesierli Division-I 4555 SW Old SGilolls Ferry load—Besverlor7,Oregon 97007--,643- 454 . . y ' :ti I u • • ' I r - ..:,.:vw..- r+:.y....s.r...-a..;�..,..,..�.•...,'.a .s.,.n.-.-J...-.r....,.�.,�...._„s,.w.«..�w,.+..ru...a wwaw,,.a.ww•.x,w.. I. , i , , ' . ', . H- - ' ' , . ' 11',,'..,,,,, •. .. ., } • . r V f}r 1 V t nr 1I I �I I I. i I; I i I ..�.:x„rw.JU , .. ., ......,.n.l a, r ,.. .,r,.r v,... ....,,,.,• .,..: ....,�. ,.. _.. ., nl �.-..i ...., }}+ dIN e , ' � • '' D , r f , ' _ t r:ti•-L»1.,.,M14.+wLJnM»nmTr•X-i=t.a a5�•Y.L...++•.W..,,I,-..e,...S.+4++.it•IAW+iA+4,-K".JL.MJ,.JNa.enl.cW.u.w...w-+�k.J•4:4AM•-S»u.UlYfAk'..-.aW'r41Uiti+1.."+•-'G"'ICI+.:GIB.Yarl`ny'r�+.M1x•+:r?...fib«+U.i:.4:,W1.l 1 ' • ..F.1d.41a•s,-, .+....xi4 a xn..t .. ,+++4»-.Y-V 1 •, p r. ,•tl W I LSEY 9,, HAM E'OFTLAND, OR :'0 MINUTE TUNE DEVELOPMENT GFNCNTF'861D f' GhCEI'1S-1, ROAD Gr;ECIUtJ FG ROAD 3/11/S6 j CENTER STREET CENTER STREET 1, AVEPAGE WEEKDAY FM PEAK 1956 1. . VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LANES TRAFFIC LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE LANE 4 f R O M L SR L SR L SR L S R 1, NORTH 70 5:::(,) to 0 0 0 0 0 t'.) 0 (�0 0 0 t;T 40 i t:► 7 c:t 0 0 cc t;t 0 c,t ID E A� t:� t:1 t:j t:� t;y t;� SOUTH 1 t:) 460 6t:c ID c:c c:y z ' WEST 20 5 85 c1 cc e,1 0 0 c:c (-.1 0 0 N {v , x UNSIGNAL 1 IZED TPAFFIC FROM LANE i LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 u _Jla.� _ ,••.ir it _ r~� w r NpF,T i-1 RESERVE CAPACITY kill, LEVEL OF 5ERV I CE A VJEr16l E.0 PLVE -aE. LOS EAST RESERVE CAPACITY 61 Ica �zb 5'bb ilb t SE RV I CE E q 4 6$ 4`IO ---- 1�l L ��L OF S G�z+.�(1310) 1311, 013'16 Qs1b l' SOUTH RESE RV SOUTH _ CAF'AC):TY 67c:t LEVEL OF SERVICE A 2'15+ C, + 2,5ci 4. "6 = , WEST FESEr'VE CAPACITY 1,6)1. IEIE1 LEVEL OF SERVICE D dr ..� OF,TH/SOUTI-.1 l i , . i l r � • e ., - }v:::M:nw.. `•"}«t •..1..Jd.Is:A••...rJ/-..ib.niuik::{.Ar#...+«H.4 cYiw,+H , L .d:.a.nan-L..v w' lh.r,..r wu.:..,-...».Aa-.li..4..a1-..-+4.-«.nr.11i........'.aY«w...nk+.-< LWM•r•n :tW +Nn 1rut Yoe.-a • , i c -, 0 , i;:. t : � - n u1f. lard General EIectrlc C February 28, 1986 1' . Thomas A. Barghausen, P.E. President Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. SF, 6625 s 190th, Ste 102 Kent WA 98032 1. Your Job #1898 and Pole Relocation for Road Improvements on SW Pacific Hwy, Greenburg. Rd and Center St, Tigard and Your Letter of .January 27, 1986 Enclosed is a copy of you r drawing showing the proposed relocation of GTE : and PGE owned poles. PGE retain its pole #1657 in the island at we will If theustaa.nddPaca.£�c Hwy, PGE to move the pole about 45 feet to the west. ' Greenburg 'wY' Our pole #1656 on Pacific HWy would be replaced with a Pole of additional he g '' ht to compensate for the fill. We need a 5-foot utility easement for PGE overhang wire encroachment along Pacific Hwy. new pole pole GTE poles A le #16.57. GTE , p proposed about 50 feet north of new o n is rop #5062 and #5063 are proposed to be replaced behind the sidewalk, We require '. a minimum easement of 4--l/2 feet for PGE and GTE on either side of'the centerline drawn between these poles. q PGE and GTE on either side of the centerline • ,require a 7•�foot easement for g We re uzr g g t extending in t o our of our line along Greenbur Road northwest of Center Scree pole #5847 which is proposed to be replaced about 3 feet to the southwest: plan poles y i i by you We ��.1�: tan to move our oles' when q ,.. • n all easements have been ac. �zred b. ' or the City of. Tigard and a decision has been e the regarding made... by the state ' design e call me at 643 5454, Ext 232 if you have the design of Pacific 1�wy: Please any questions ] Sincerely' ' ( , 4 ct Thompson Supervisor, special :Projects Engineering , Western DiVision JAS'/sa3.2A2 1 Enclosure c: Craig Zuc '' ' Keith Liden; City Of Tigard i'_ ,� Lee Barry, GTE Wog1erti t)wtg,cri-1 X656 SW Old 8c17olls Ferry Rood--Besver(cri, OPegori 97()07--,-648-5454 .,, . "I 'a-.. .,,.,,:: ........... ....i .• Y i.ti u..„ :.'....,..,. ..i vs_.., ......,k. t ..0 ,ens - a u, »».»rw• .w` r e .0 z www,k, a..w,.✓ o.a, vl,a • o, .w i.r ,urlA�,...,,,—I n„ w4..n W..� u, N.4w,.w. ..::Jw..9.,e,.•.eW,-i+tJ l•r iv J' �;N�.-,...M1+'ISr f�.+,1.+_.a.i+•?.WI-.i•Yl.-MwM::.l.+7.Mtr. ...Hkh?,.-+-L�a{.Ld.�.:.1...+3-..,� .a3,W, -..,La.lwf'w°s.✓,JYP+:.`,�'31'' tl V . , • r • • . l I I t' it • , n �` xA 1 i t .-.+.I--.W., u..Y..M«+✓ ... .iWL..t.min^.lAf-.L.4rv...„+.+wu.-..-+1:..4.-McW.4n.-Y+ • REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS TO: .itiitidirde • February 2 1 1986 ,+ ATE: -- FROM: Tigard Planni Department , RE' SDR 6-86 & 'V 5-86 Request by First Interstate Trust to develop a 6800 sq. ft. retail/auto service building & an automatic car wash. A variance is also requested for deletion of a portion of public sidewalk along Center St. & to al --a--landscaped area of 3% where 15% is required. The property is zoned C-G (Commercial General) Located corner of Sly' Greenbur d., & Pacific Hwy. 9, C'CM S1 AA lo Is 1000, 1001 84 11(..)C ylicant's statement for your review. From Attached is the Site Plan and app information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other E, ' ' ' information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. ' you ou wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by March 4t11 19 86 You may use the space provided below or attach a , your comments. If you are unakle to res rwd b ` i• separate letter to return, y above date lease phone the° staff contact noted below with your comments and above your P' comments in writing as soon as possible., If you have any questions regarding this matter, 'contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-x4171,. • ®o�c 23397; Burnham and Ash Ave„ T' STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY ` ed the proposal arid have no objections to it, We have reviewed p please e c on to Ct of our office. , 1 . , Please refer to the enclosed letter. ' Written comments 7 .. _ ,f;, Name of Person COn thtIng ►� �.:, Phone No, �. �.......� ICI 2-..'. (IrsL,Pm/O86G0` 1. EJ 1:3 w DO ' � ; ' SEA , . . „'... .,. , ......,.. ..,...•...,r, _. ,,. ..Ala . • • REQUESTS FOR COMM• ENTS MENTS , � TO: �, Ai DATE: February '''l 1986 FROM: Tigard Plannirog Department SDR 6-86 (Si V 5-86 Request by First' interstate .Crust to develop a 6800 sq. ft. �t retail auto service building & an automatic car wash. A variance is also (, I _ Y requested for deletion of a portion of public sidewalk along Center St. & to all • q � a andscaped area of 13.5% where 15% is required. The property is zoned c--G (Commercial General) > Locat,.:d cornet of SW Greentur. d. & Pacific Hwy. ' WCT1.A•A lots 1000,. 1001 , & 1100). Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From .• -information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other ' information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by March �. 4th , 19 86 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to ra�sp�ond b + the • above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your commnents writing ,as soar as possible., If you have any ^..� �. in n g i y questions regarding this ratter, "contact the Tigaxr,d Planning Deparrtment, P.O. • Box 23397, Burr-sham and Ash Ave. , ''gard, OR 97223 Phone: 639-4171," STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CNECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS STN THAT APPLY: XX the proposal and have no objections to it. have reviewed We hav p I,I p Please contact of our office. Please refer to the anclosed letter'. - Written comments: ---- " i� t has .no oh `ectio s to this deveiapmen r i . While the water da�str c 1 " that trice has a 6'° I).I. Water main is ;important to note i.ha� tie Otis,. ,�...�... Greenburg Road. We assume that there • along this portion of 5. W. �_k.... . will be no vacation o C � �,�:p-top.ex - although the sa.ca.ows.lk win be deleted t I' _ I .... ....�..:._.:w... .«—.-- ham. '" / ✓„ � , ;yip' yl."• ./�.��/ �'" Naive of Person Croy entin . Aobc1"'b. E. 5a .tee Pharia Pros 639-1554 I I (KSL,pm/03g60) • Y '� (ire. `t • • // 11 r R'QUESTS FOR COMMENTS .J 1 a TO: + DATE• FROM: Tigard P i anning Department RE: SDR 6-86 & V 5-86 Request by First Interstate Trust to develop a 6300 sq ft , retail/auto s ervice buildin g & an autom atic car wash. A variance is also requested for deletion of a portion of public sidewalk along Center St. & to all . a andscaped area of 15.5% where 15% is required. The property is zoned �I C-G (Commercial General) Located corner of SW GreenburL Rd. & Pacific Hwy. S l AA lots 1000, 1 Q01', & 1 l00). • � _ W�'� applicant's statement for, your review. From Attached is the Site Plan and " supplied by various departments and agencies and from other • �nfor�asatxon upp � information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. fQ. ou�wi h to comment I you on this application, we need your comments by :attach a !" pp March 4th , 19 86 You may Provided below ora {{ use the space p nu are unable to res• a separate Jett nd b the M lease return hone the staff contact noted below with Your comments A above date please p , . rm._..yo in writing as soon as possible., If you have any f�.rm your ..comments Tigard ng p cu� y r, :contact the '��, ors! P].anrr 13® a�^tmer�t, P.O.P questions regarding this matte . 97223. Phone: 639--4171.. ; Box 2339'7, Burnham' and .Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR Keith Lider STAFF CONTACT: .�..�........ ..... :.-" • PLEASE "ECK THE FOLLOWING 'STEMS THAT APPLY We have reviewed f;he proposal and have no objections to it. j.; please - of our office ease contact the enclosed letter ' Please refer to .' n written comments: ' • I ' N�dry V y 1 w II Name of Per J e . Phone h n N 0 w (#csLt omi0356w) aa ...• ✓v n ..ru. n n. . •.er nu n r •.,.ua a v,u T,,r .u•.r••✓w ..0 -..• .,nn. J..+ ..u.au, r1.0.e• ..•.i.v •. . I. ......„.1........ .. ..,,wr. ..rue r..,r. vl.. rcr•.• nvr.,.•.x. . ti.•..i � ^nom ^ • 1 11 • ' 2 4- y{ J / ' ' '' h'-• • ' '''''' ' ' 1 e /6/c ' ' ' ' . ' ' ' '' y , e9 . , . , , ,,, .. . , .., / , ., , /1 .„ 1 , , , . , 1 .„. ,. . , , . , 1/, . 88 44,E P,, „�,:_ � ______, . , i � 1 • . ,. . • , ..., „„. , , . .,....... • , , , ,7 ,„.. .. . no, ei. N ' ,-".. ' ,..:', , . . fri7 1.//'6'.1 /it'.) I ' e''ke,414-4 :P.-. ' .6'' 'S ' Afr' ' ,•1'10 ' ..r '- . ,i,-ts4,5- . ' r. - ' , •''' • -. ' , e':)., , 0 ,d..��C ! i�� _ %(/IJ— : �� � I ,A.'„ele/ill/Pl/t '' er,...r.c/1,---4 , e2-e.,...,..- ' . ' ....s':' igi,,',9A--. .a.i.?e'deog.4-”' ' . , , ed,r:,;,„,..-„ , --e:rzi.) . _ ,, -7>z,,,,,,4„,,,,,,._„,., .- 'e) , 4 , ■ '+ w...ww w...,+...'v'""""w wr.�«u.•�•'"'vw'" ' ,v...+wlr..uwnw»... w m qa. e.www.- ' E'w"r.....w., 1*( ,Ii"I i'tA'6rrF»� '^.�' ' jr '� W` �J F '. 4«r/ 'r...""" `'�✓'e /75---' , , , ' r o ,, , „ , 7 , „ , 1,. . cie,,,..tP ., eidt,,,,,,,,i,- -,iir,.....e-1„,.:_. ., ,/,.. fo.2.4,s, 1 , e..-4 4,e,, 7 ' I • ., ` te,/r' ''� c � , J 1 , w 6!�i t� • G r,"` v��,,"" fry f? '1 " '' ‘'''''''''''''' ' " .e.,e#3-s-- --- 4i/43' ' e,11.e..., ..i<41-z060,4't-.4p-.-•-• •- ' , • c'"::_eit',..4,i-s 5-"7/,‘-'416°-?/"". - 1,',",, . { r r I ,' ' 1, •- ,— • h ' ' . -- ' ' ,i,le-' -''61' ', e . .' H i!,,d., (4'4-.. itriti.,.,,.,, a- ':' ' . e 4"" , • '�I i.;= « u,....lad.. ».Ga.:. ,-w.» ..,y..., .r«. .., r«,.w-r u.u+...,N_ .i„-...,_tiN.xSi,.•...panx..r--+» ...,.. _ r ` • REQUESTS FOR CO11ENTS TO: 1 , A r. DATE: Fel)ruar 21 , 1986 . I L • FROM: Tiga planning '0 •artment RE: SDR 6-86 & V 5-86 Request by First Interstate Trust to develop a 6800 sq. ft.l retail/auto service building & an automatic car wash. A variance is also requested for deletion of a portion of public sidewalk along Center St. & to al' a Tandscaped area of 13.5% where 15% is required. The'p•roperty is zoned C-G (Commercial General) Located corner of W Greenbur_ Rd�. & Pacific Hwy. (WCTM 2S]AAA lots 1000, 1001 , & 1 100). applicant's statement for, your review.it other Attached is the Site Plan and ap and agencies and _ information supplied by various departments infor• lation available to our staff, a report and recommendati.on wi.l l be . •prepared and a decision will be rendered on the pr.oposa1 in the near future, • If youiseJish to comment on this applilcatiornd we need your comments by March h 19 86 You may use the space provided below or. attach ,a separate letter tarn your comments. If ou are unable to tomes .aid b the, above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible., If you have any rtg Department,, P.O. I questions regardir►g this matter, contact 'the 'T�. and lann a Lotc 23397, Burnham and Ash Rwe. , Tigard, OR 97223. P hone: 639-41714' Keith 'Li.den �. STAFF F CONTACT, Lid ell - 4 PLEASE`CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: . . I • osalsar►d have no objections to , e, 41p have reviewed the prop Please contact of our office, e Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written • comment + ► • • . I • I ti L , Nattle of Pe••sdh Cotnitienting No. � ph n o .e `l91 L w • I , I I m -i 03 6 6 ��4�L ra ) `tl"Au'u '.+L•r� .. •+•.•w.,:«.N,w.r+«....,ac....»...-,. x ..�� .a.rw�...•+w. yfa+it+.•,i++.�•n u,wwn•a^a.,«s t"t.as+.�' ,,...1.0„v.--,,,,. ,f1,,,,),...$4,,, ,..n.:,, . , L . ; ''' ' ) I j., ° ' r�r•.',,t�.`)7 ;;I:r Y Ii ir a }R� . ' ` ' h�l �jlJ,y qy q#I 1 t''t�Q'gi r�,, �1�'}il'�4it llra 9/j,(c•f al,wj:,V'4=�YM r ,' r • 1_ ,. ; :; . ''',11,L.--.i , C 'r 44, "le � ,,,p,011Cy,: jK r . a" er t'f.r { �,t M e a r{"• #, � 14 • 1(44, l:;rr 4 ri g aft;M. 4 ry' , I r� Y k$p� ''I S '`l t t M • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ' y,,!i'P r s 0`," N 1 ,), af i F `tom t�f ' ,,..%`tr - p ,p';"�'T,4:, ,r ,1 a t F�'t...'•P � �a a'�a rt �, 1, 36k 4 *- NEERING SERVICES R CHECKLIST � r 4 ,4.. 4:fi -- �v ir��� �y�� 4r �rf h I ,� /rt , -. 100,10A14-41,1,..t,,§,fi"t�� � ° Lrr K r � t,:7 r.r4�,'+1a �;'y,' I . � gi ,• =txy, #.2 of ra r , f, ty 4 Y : r�' ;v1 LL ,a�a s+k ,;SJ 4 ,�' CHECK 4 , SUBMITTAL ' v, • +>i a „ ! °, G ---1`°J '" (I tTEtI WAS*�" r ;« <Y. y mow. DATE• SIOEP'ED}f" ik 1,i 'c ,5 ' i iiiE. 'r''ce.•s"C+ .�1,."b.... F'..s-r..4rc .E' 4 (IONS ' l' • •�xray, , ,P.-- „ ,,,4 ~. r,.',W` ' ' 'f'�'fir' ';yilj" 'G`ENCY COORDINATION .(OR) P RM'XT CONSIDERATIONS: ,, Ap,yy ��.f�����yy ..TyL� ry[y, •' •' ','tr t }}��,},, ]1'F���'U'�S 4A`�� J �j/� ,p y�j Y e•e•!1 d.• •e d• •w Y• s • �.• • • O . •n t ,.a Y. 1•.:, • • �����,VK�y''k ,}ti�J' ������V•�JY'GdRM{i� • r • • • • .�'v •.o • e • • d• •♦ •O •o • • d r� • ' '. ; i��ri ;, fi tk1",Ar r rk, C•O•E• E.Q., F.E.M.A.;, U•S.U.S.R.S. r t. ' ' r t+ t}tC)a QY' c �, i B) State • • s •.c e,. • e r o • • •• •.• ♦ u •:e • •e• s u♦ • ••• e�. j.:' �r#�f� �,; „1 ;"_�r ' r L C.DeCe, State Lands, Commerce Dept. , Board of Health, ' tMI � r Q7'• B.R.C. P.U.C. , Water Resource, Wildlife; �p � �q ',f ;SA9r 4#,,''';�,'4."&t-4...,',,„,%:.‘-', rt b•EwQ•, Parks & Recrea`t ion;. � t.i 1, ,�Jf a r; �y1 tp „ r ,,y{ 1 FF`k,�'�J? .r9,i'?"g;1,-. iN,{'r.egional, . n •• t . w e • . • e • e •u • • • . • a • • • • • •`'• tl• •• '• •• • •- • • e• ••• �� f' 'J�1`,'t, {{ U.,a` :'� ``; ,...4:„,.,.,, etro, Tri-Met ' 4��,4 :•�1 A� u.�l r 1Rd)_ County'•• •• e,• •• w' • s• n • • • • • • • • • • ..e • • • • • • • o• • • •• •'e •• • ••?,-...,.••4 • • • • x w yii ,, 't i 5 + U •A•,' Publa,c Works, Health DePt• , Land Use & Tran'sprtation "°'a „ inj y e k� yF) Local. y • • • • • • • • t'• • • • r • r• • • • •• • ••-,e a • - •,i-.1i,,,,,,,, ,,., ` t�; f �r4 4t 2) tf igd,rt,7, p� g $�; F r,� . . CIy oT : " , t .,V� 1 rfv " 4 r" 4 ' r a, . EsL ins ', °ti�� �o ",i,';� ? � .Development Services, Operat�uns, IIua1d�ng ng .11 I 0,,,, r . a,, 11 t ,4� ' En�axeer Fahance, Adminastratiorx, Council, P7.arannc, t . , , •i Mt J 1,/ r #' Comtnu,ssion, Park Board, N•P•0. ���:t'� J V ' ,,', (NOTE: Pg• # 2 for details hereiriregat d) , ,}x, ;tit! y���4�,y1'( ,.2). •Othr r » Ji r '' fl"��` �: Dire District, P.G�E• , N.W� ,IVatura`1 Gas, Water District, ,5` ��""';<,` Telco Storer Cable, Solid Waste, Private ship, J��_� x5' '. �.' •� � Cable, Owner e.,:",40 "k• , , School District • �'l'S '� "/t Y'! '.,I��. • GENERAL CONFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS c ' f ) r� �� �: . „, �,� Transportation System • .,.tl • . . . . • » . . . . • tl . .♦ . . • . : • • . . . ••_..r•..w:.••.,..�.,.a•.-- . m. ,' i 1) City of .Tigard: •ath ►,.6f:;�,,f h Plan 1 ,i� ,,t��'�als " a) Comprehensive ' 2� ��•,r^/, ,� b)' Street C3.assifi.cation(s) ' W ,i , , I ' ..,35, ,4r'!`; c) 'Bike/Pedestrian Path Plan o' ;.r i'l,'n'' 1 d). Traffic Studies (C13,1,4 Hill & STF 1M.) •" " } '' iS'' e) E�kist.ing Pending, &der Construction °' , L 2) FRegiorial Transport at ion Plan ' "- i t`; • I . . N I nwF d ,ENGINEERING SERVICES REVIEW CHECKLIS ,, (Cont ) ' t a ' �.a• c ,,•, <a�'' Fnu j w pr.UIF n•I Y D• D evelopment � on-Rem.on'st L a '•, _ w w �• • ° �Y « ITEM #I(E) DE,P►ILS ;Y r �,.° w , Comp Plan Amendrnent. . Sena. st�.ve Lad.n s Zone Change:'. Floadplain . , .rl • ., • ' ,• C �1 • Major/Minor Parti:tion •0 onditaonal 'Use . Plan ned De velop ment. ,• Temporary Use. L 9; • ' t 0 '' *Variance l .4.e, .r AnrfCat] ♦ Y _ • . . A,,Q }'.• �. . 4�`Q�" . Nonconforming Use. . Seer CQn.nection Permit. Acces nary Structure. . . • • . • . . . \%?... $ kpf,, � M Tree Removal Permit• ' .• Fi l Permi.'t• � � . Blasting I 'ermi,t•' .,. Street Opening Permat r r Vit♦ . Special Assessment..:&: . . ;• • . Business Tax. . . . . . • • • . • . • .. � Compliance Agreernent. . .• . • • . .0 °� • e ''Y. «,? •!r•' "��, w, p4 Feed s. • L t•` •' .. 1 Detailed Plan. . r . ��• .� . •, .0 �7oint Use Agreement• . ' �Sedication'r r • • • . ,• • • w ' Easen'tent. nAg Maintenace reement • • System Development Charges:Charges: 0-.co Sti. e,.e. • , . , I . • ) E; tra Capacity Streets• r •Q i Recreation Facilities. . . . .a ♦ . Storm Drainage Improvement. •,. , .0 Sanitary Sewer Surcharge. ♦ .❑ . t f �' a . . E, N ,p III) SPECIAL CONCERNS: A) That this intorrtiaticn (form) bel touted to the City Engitleet fob: ,ta eiView arid comment. . . . . . r • • . . • • • • : •• 1,► . � .41e54 rr NO [ ' �3) "i.4 tc.'2It,b,„ t�� •b tl. ,e..e. 1 .'or..1ya•t'r-e.. Iti t .3r.tr+ I 1 s lk:, � a f•. t 'NON t ��r PAC 'k-a e'. ,� �r '''''3 'wziks � Y,,t+\yy as �y, y,1\],i L`,, N i I ` vNA ',� �iw, )11"�.i� IOr � .. 42• u MIO,� 1 LJ -T 1N AVN1� 1' 1 e.+�.. +\�./ :.Yyy�l��� �.y.(I��yyyy'u''y � `f��y,\,, -t}�..+�.�j\j� f :b M y I ,p,„, .e,.III, . ,•:• t. e. ,,,A,s_+i, •`«.o.!^ .I ,, . ,, w.l, a •tiw, '�.�t ton G-1,�." theV.` °^ 0ti+� �,r •:NI iihulNi s f ilil !. a. g • • i n , , . ..i.. .,..-1.1. .�..k� w•.«Vni�—r r......Y•iri4Mwlu��..J.w «-4..� .t aroN.4. • • • I Via, . pr Hl,Vel-0 �eA.Ir "(.� �rro se ,0t+� ` ,i , C,v.eet4 N.hr � . , ` t ay, \• \.. M c tv'illit- ^1e�. � qg, 1 , ,. - eigl ' e.,\,.. \ ‘,- c \.\,.., \- \a 1, \ . ,,,, 1,),,.. 1,. ,,,', , „ 6, \c, et. 4 . `�v,,r ,r,c.a.. e.^®.y.. t'v,.'b �e,b e.,' a to act-�t s' era v1.�el, 4' '7 tv�arcs li `: a,, .VL.e,.. \,A.ce)e-s.ec-N-i,ov% t5k 45i7'2.C‘‘t-I.C.. �" s tA�t 1�"-M� S .�♦JI Cr� 61'1 Z'�r 1N♦11 • !/'∎,ei s!' t'-7 K,.^'M. .. i e�ir�.k+\ `� C--- •, Oln,S rr � � e......4,`�erg-��- w�'2.6,`�'� � ,� , I �' J• `r is v,.� .,! cq a,,♦nt ° �.u� ,, n n�a a�l `'' ,• 1 t1 \‘)e_.M . e' •�^ , \ a b"'WL d \�ePO•� �o� '. J+L 4 I \\ \c, k„t tA, b\-, t...11tireleivkichlt-A.tf' 1,-.-"Zt C ''' e V -a s i ke:, c:\, et- ii!.%vs, VI-%...)i2-/re- Vii"e-016-42-A- fa) % ":,c..1). s 0, ..„, .,,, , ,\,,,. k,\,. \o � 6 I w e; ".a ir-Ze IL .1.• 1 ., A, , et,.e.c.,Ist.,...,i =,,s‘ _ ,.,2,A,., e.e.,._„, , 4.A.5 k t".4.4,.., a,-d..'t.,,,,A-i .24,4..1 scat Cs(4,',. 1 (‘ . \r44w ■I\k IC \ '''' 4 A eie,..e. .2, r.e.e... , e-s, e-\1,) 4, ', LA..ist,\\ \Oe.00 e., P \s, S,,,-‘it,.. ' L, ( it s -, vA ' ! li , , \ ,. c(_,,,,„,4vIrdt G...a Y QMVI JJ 3' ' 111...JJ1 .e.-4,0%,4 e., s i ' ' t , / ,i ' ,,,, *C"., ‘ S■./ V ' \%, \firk, C r . tom � "�, • Ind qe k "• ii... y p, , ft-.\Le- ric -c-„ 1/4,,,-,,s Nret.,..4,44„ , ,A .,,,,, ,... e.,„..,,,,„_,,t,„,,,,.„, ,, „,,,..),.,,,e,„ ..., ,,,,,\, , .0„„,.3„,.,,,,,,,,,....s7 4.A.Isk it.idA.4"...0 ET:•Ni.-41.0-'14. ' ie,, 2.1.1?1,,e...4,. . l wHv:.- �ux, 4.. lNnr4t. MaAf. 4niw.NUiw4 i y- • (,...,. ( ENGINEERING SERVICES REVIEW CHECKLIST (Copt'd) '. IV ) RECOMMEND1 TICNE 'I ,. • • A) Apply the "Standard Conditions" noted on pages #4--6 (herein) . , rr l ii b-w‘q a 99 \GycC C�c��J►F�', VtJL 1la �‘A.Nr Ni atC� i nu9 i n . ‘,,,e..,,,,,,,,„..,. ,4....„ ,... e... rv.,D +4 /' r I. '.ate s '4°e. 111. O lA rx V'�,� �1'�'1r�'�' - • 1_ + 1�-�,�UGC'_.. V �y� K : cs \r‘R-in\4 r\- tA . ) �' � w S. +r- Gtr t.\ e' w �^' , . / '6` a c� w 5 rr ,tom Q L 4 � e SSA 1 , 1 v) "`",:---t\.e..c....;;—: e,,,j,,..1„,, ,„ s ,.,..a.. V.e... 8v‘s ,, e, ‘. ....(:),„A„,k, e,„ vest-c.i1i,..c..st.-.i.,. rt■Jek.ke2k,\ 1\ I , Pa i Y % `. • 0. t,.: 4(4.4,5; b Oci,a.**t 1 NOTE At if 1 1 Attach additional' sheet8 nedeee i.kl., ,k,„ , err • \ .. Abe $ttse c W • % . STANDARD CONDITIONS :' c' _ ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET, PRIOR to ISSUANCE • Un�r..F�S OTNFRwSE fJOTEO, { OF BUILDING PERMITS, ,.,41-----t---)I''xY v � MOB"�► �" Stan a hi:1f-street improvennts including' • i.ewalk'), curb*, dstgw s'� ' Ms.'y?-`;,•:-.-'1'.driveway apron" , stor-rn drc.inage. nd unlit r o e • „, .,A „.,..:_ :.,...r...i.•.!...,.-:) shall be installed along the S, , c.tc'ke..x t ,mss _ _- . frontage, S a m d~improvements along c.t:A). ''F)=e,... .. ' w r • shall be built to 1 .• e).1:2_4_72. ....�. w.._ . s arrd confarni to t ali� ent of ' - � _� tandard _ � " ' existing adjacent t intprovemerlts .�., A - �u e, ' a•.915.b o41 ■rwt.t„.t . St ndar'd h. if--street improvemerrts including sidewalk' ', curb', IS v a w 2H. , half--street a -. storm drainage and .utiliti shall be installed alon' g the ,Ita, bk tR - , --.¢�.2 NF"' 4 br , adJ �4? frontage. Said improvements along a - shall be built to. Nr6� olr, 411..e.c.kair. • .__ standards acrd c nform to the ali nment of ' ' existi.n ` adjacent improve ants and .atA. , �' . 'kvn public improvement construction p'Lans sets of plan -prof i l.e prouemerrt con and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailin g all proposed Public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering' Section for r. approval. I .rw+ ,.� `, detail shall be provided as part of the ' '�.' Sanitary sower � ;.�. .. public imprGVem�ent -_:..,,...,:;..........,.• ,. .plans, i '. �• p Construction of proposed public improvemtnts shall not 'comrnence. until • a � ' pP � I p n t after the Engineering Section has issued a roved public tmproveme require postirig of a 100 % d, • plans, Performance Borg will re the payment or a permit fee °'� fee, Thy Sec ion e an�1 a sign insualla,tion , ., ? Also, the execution of a street opening permit shall occur prior to, or torrcurr�ently with the issuance of approved public impro■enlent plans, SEE, fNE ENCLOSED ^y SPECIFIC RECAROxruG 'EE �. -- SCNaUL HANC�oU� �xtlx�G MORE ����x�IC rNFaR�fA 13oNUTNC AND ACgEEMLNTS, A one (I.' ) foot reserve strip granted to the City of Tigard shall. be provided at the terminus of 4 0 right a ` shall be dedicated to the Public -,the i ,.�t► ? ' Additional ra.gh f--+� y w e u� k., r v� eA- �cyeto& ,,E: x t t� ,W.:.: zA. .a. —,,,.==.4 -,-:....,' .,,-.° ».` , » •co‘ar , �t ...,..-4.-:•,,,.1.',, 'r: ‘%tx itii, 1 «- a tc:.* w 4� ; wco'k .e,'''4 descr ption for' said r r` dedicatiorr shall he tied to in right tnr as M � o �Ne Kist g � 1. ce��►tc�r1 established by C. :),t .k x,‘ The dedication document shall be on City forms grid approved by the Errgirieerihr S ±ctioni, DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS AR ", LNCLO8L1). • xrx STANDARD D CA nNS TA ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE UNLESS t�THERWISE- NOTED, I .. OF BUILDING PERMITS. ' Standard ha' lf-street improvements including sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, n drainag� and utilities xt e s (delete • inapplicable items) shall be installed alo ng the • ;, i ti frontage, Said 'improvements along - shall be built to standards and conform ;to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements and (or) r • cg,• half street improvements including v + lk� curb, *(�►■+4 f St. s ode ,..r . . driveway a ran storm drainage and util.it le delve y p rt' ) ;shall be installed along the ,L)...) }' ##�„r�s",,•. I • frontage. Said impro ve ments along y;Y"� shall be built� I . • standards and conform to tr he alignment of r existing adjacent im rovem-nts and C.otA L �n� .e . I I Seven (7) sets of plan-profile pu b11G �mprove m ere t construction stru c t�os plans S i I and one (1) itemized' construction cost estimate, stamped by a d,176'''. Registered 'Professional Civil. Engineer," detailing all proposed public the Engineering Section for �rr �kY improvements shall l be submitted to S ,i n pN , approval, 4 ,,,16$1"'"i,,a " r• : Sanitary sewer deta�,l s shall P provided ovx ed as part of the 15/4"!!..”. publ is improvement plans. Construction of proposed public improvesaerits shall not commence until i after the Engineering Sectori has issued approved public improvement plans, The Section . . I ,i Performance Bond, I' Yi r ar� �• I e posting r i at xQne°;str ee�light h OSti�n'� of a will require y F•,, r tl�e paymery� of a permi.� fee and a sa. n instal �rrni,� or construction Also the execution of a street opening p compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or coricUr•rerrtly with the plans„ SEE' THE O . �. issuance of approved public irrprouement p RE SPECIFIC INFORMATION RE(AROli EEE SCM_d�1LES BUT GIVING MORE ,� BONDING AND AGREMNT'S i "City�r � shall and A one (i ) foot reserve p i e stra. grar��ed to the CYtUU of �.g i .7 be provided at the terminus of r Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontagie to increase the right -0fe3Y The descriptor aid feet—from cehterline �- to� 1.xn for der a as dedication shall e existing right a�tl cap t i n �.l bo tied to the o�rxs ' established by �. The dedication document shall be on City i.� .. nd._.,.' by the forms and �►pprru Eng ineeri.ng Section, DE"�ICATION FORMS ANO INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED. r u '. ' ' ( k • . . ,, .<v.v.W......t�....,,.....,F4,...1„.,.+.d....tw.....-r:.lr._,xV:,,M.-.xa, y.AUS+.-+aa, x,..,.,..,ks.ti...ywwn.-t,.r,4,#.w uu a..L.r,,is.::11:•,...,.hA«;, Additional right -of -way shall be dedicated to the Public along the • to frontage to increase the • feet from centerline. The description fofor said dedication shall be tied to the existing right--of-way centerline as established by the dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by . The ' Engineering Section. DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENC .O,SED. Joint use and maintenance agreements shall be executed and recorded - on City standard forms for all common driveways. Said agreements shall be referenced on and become part of all appl:'' ;able parcel Deeds. Said agreement shall be approved by the Engine ;ring Section. JOINT USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FORMS ARE ENCLOSED Street Centerline Monumentation In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2), the centerlines of 1. all street and roadway right-of--ways shall be monumented before the City shall accept a street imprdverraent, , 2. All centerline' monuments shall be placed in a monument box .. conforming to City! standards, and the top of all monument f• shall be set at design `finish grade of said street 'or roadway. i 3, The. following centerline monuments shall. be set: a, All centerline--centerline intersections. Intersections created with "collector” or other existing streets, shall be set when the centerline alignment of said "collector" or other street has been established by or for the City; ° 4 ` b, Center of all cul-de--sacs; c. Curve points, Point of intersection (P.I.) then their e the limits of the pavement otherwise position falls inside beginning and ending points (B.C. and E,C,) , in positions , placed P d All sanitary and storm locations l shall m�n�mentation that do not interfere with center r 'G'' sis of bearings" for the Plat or Survey shall, The "b a be i which is a part of the Tigard Field survey Network n ks bLrecc�r and �ublxc works , After review and approval by the planning , } ` (�i.rector, the �'ihal Plat shall be recorded with I�ash�.ngtoh County ,r, (RSCtbs/07 7P 7 v 1. w yr ,.r „,,...J,y..t•�;:, ,�+...a�w,,:Nx.+.c.a„aw..xww a...,...«. ::;a�..,�w.uo.yM.;.l...r�n,ti;,r.{:...r<M...4i•ne:.w»..,1.,;. • • t..,,;a.+, .i. ,Eia ..sw....,»r+F-„�,..�.a...,,. .�..,»i�. ..u.l..a »,....r.i.• ....,.,.a.+..o.d.«.wn�m ,»,,5..•.r....�M..'lt.y..a»'„n..M,:a .r»+ «.u.f�..t»,µyaw.;.,.,• , IE; 1E: , . "Land Planning, Survey, and Design Specialists” { January 31 , 1986 Mrs. Keith S. L.i den Senior Planner City of Tigard p Department Community Deve I o m��.nt' De a P (J. Box 2.:3397 B • Tigard,and Oregon 97223 i_. cati on for 60-�M i nut% Tune/Retail i Re: Site Deve 1 o menu App 11 , p Review Development for Oramore,; Inc., at the Northwest Corner of , Highway 99W and S.W Greenberg Road Ou Job No. 1898 near. Mr. Lident . • _P ursuant to o_ur pre-application conference held on ,Thursday, January 30, 19860 I want to take this opportunity to supply your office with F t h the following documentation and request a formal review in accordance Tigard site development review process for this project. r ' with the Gity of -Tig p compiled based upon the application information This information has been comp 1• brochure provided ded by your office, together the Standard s i t'4a Develop ,, br p with �, to ether t went: Review application. 1 . One (1 ) original yellow copy of the Site Development Rev i e p y p application with the information a pp ro r i at'e I r ovided and ature of the oWner and/or agent indicated. should be advised acting the roprre�• • g that- this office Is actin as th .4 repre- sentative ve for; the applicant i can i p of sent nt-, and we should ca copies tion and any notices issued by your office. w y vv all documents Seattle office at �, e to our Se This information should be submitted the following address. Barghaus eh Consulting Engineers s Inc., 6625 South 190th, Suite 102 Kent, Washington 98032 { 6625 South 100th,#102 • keht,Washington 08032 (206)812,.552 9 , ..... ».w .......:i.=.-«. .r.u. .....:.w..,y.... w..«.>.....,._ .u.+<:..-,w...dw,,:..,...w.+dw.. M..u.....,4..J:..i-... `' ' ' ' ' ' ( . ' ' 1 ' (a„ ' x Mr.. Keith. S L i cien Senior Planner 1986 . : Comrmlu.1n i t Deve!opment Department -2- January 31, r. y 4 '�Ong (1 ) check made pay able to the City of Tigard'rd i n the . amon dve l opme nt e r ev i ew package. 3. dive (5) Copies of the ite deelopment plan for. . a. rori ate a•!• the scale e of 1" 20# providing all I of 1-he PP P site development details for the proposed project. . . 4. Five (5) copies of architectural elevation plans, Providing ' � basic :information concerning the "architectural look" for the l;. buildings on the sito� 5. One (1 ) cop y of'the Wahington''Gouty sessorVs map fohe t property with the parcel outlined An red. . 6. One (1 ) list of the names and address of all persons owning, ' s property within 10.0 feet of the subject site. , . 7. One (1 co py o a tit{ transf er i istr umer � d ed t cth es site'e verif 1ng the legal desci p• i on an d th e cu rren- ow nershl p. , of a• site rading/drainage and utiiity, plin �., 5) co . g for the project providing i nformation regard i ng storm drainage improvementsb; site grades,' and sanitary sewer' s ery i c e for: the pro ect. 9. Five (5) copies of a site survey worksheet completed fo the property providing' existing topegrpphl�c information and location of a1 l e)i,st i ng pub! i and private i mprovements. 10 Five t5) copies of: a prelimin ry landscaping plan providing.• ,� the required information incorporated within the application J requirements. 11 Five 5) c, pies o f a p ropo'sed sign applica t sion, together' wi th . o the justif l cat i on, for po e s i gn prov d i ng advert i si ng for the proposed project. The sign asing requeted is iarger than that whioh Is a[1,0Wed un der the standard prov i s ions of the c od®� bu t is Within the 50 p er cenI increase l i mits allow- able under adm i rt i strat i ve rev i eW l+y, your office . of the variance o plicatlen supporting the i 12e One (1 ct�Py p . ; requested r ;duct flan t l the landscaping area ors the site as t in the site lan, set -forth p i i . , • . 6. • 1 • ..n i. ..,.....0". ...•_.a.w:C......W.+ .«,-r....y,wa,.....u...... .ul,..,«ai«h.+,.wa-.w...:: N,, . I ■ (' c r - Mr. ieith S. Eiden Senior1Planner January 31p 1986 Community Development Department -3 E Would you begin the processing n g of this Site Development t . Review application and forward to this of u e your written response and I ,, app roval as soon as possible. The application documents incorporate the and , comments that were made by your staff at both 'of our previous meetings and, as it is designed will meet with your approval We • the ro ect 9. hopefully, P ,1 '• for the building permit review, and we are also aware of your requirements� be sure that our f i n a l plans,p l a n s, wi I I be reared at the same scale, , will prepared ' will be complete in the necessary details for review. It should be noted . 1 that.the unique configuration of the property, combined with the large site has created a need for several 7z street frontage around the s� , . � which need to be addressed in �, e regulations wh a�rro i antes from the existing st ing cod g ,. variances . the site review process. At the same time, we,, believe the design the ed. ih a•creative approach to the use of the 1 i res u!t r project has hopeful y site. The following specific comments should be taken into consideration in . . your review. 1 . We will be' br i ng i ng the entire project approximately to l grade This particularly aPp es to the westerly �, ' with l•I i ghway 99W. { i portion of the site which is currently vacant. The filling , , � , I of slope the site will result in the need for a p e _easemen`l adjoining property in ...P ert y to the west from the Oregon Department of Transportat i ori, and a retaining wall along the north property , boundary adjacent to Center Street. This retalhing wall variable 1, e in height from a minimum of 2 feet to a ,� will b ev g w . '``''r maximum of 'approximately 12 feet.' A guardrail will be provided along the edge of the asphalt, and the design ii ;I drawings provide a cross section of,the proposed construc- tion As agreed, 5ile well will be constructed on the 1 , property landscaping strip lying inside of the line with the � wall on the site itself. Specific design calculations and a ,:; report from a certified soils engineer w i l l be provided with • the building Permit Plans for this part of the project. 2. The filling on the site will be completed in accordance with �• standard g eotechnical recommendations for the placement of structural f i i l . Once again, `a report and recommendation w i l l be provided with a b u i l d i n g permit for this s part of the I I project and continuous reports for compaction will be vo during the g All of the work in available g fillin process. this regard will be completed under the supervision of a ua! g ified eotechnical consultant, I qualified the property has resulted t of street 3. frontage on th P y • The amount � . e l of off-site i to i mprovement being required for the • in a 'le�l abl c is reasonably development ;which. ,far e. exceeds that which � Y I expected for normal commercial development. The developer • I , f • • • • (i/i • Mr. Keith S. L i den S e planner enior Community Development Department 14- January 31, 1986 proposing p these improvements and dedicate the i s ropos i rt �-o complete _. additional right-of-way necessary to accommodate the street Improvements in accordance with the requirements of the City • of Tigard rd and the Oregon Department artment of Transportation. Improve 'h e�ctent of s..-Ceet f ron#age yd.I ich is gene!. .LI,.�G cis i tiered E'e i.Y,�� _Qr this twn �f deYeont .� b.Qp e +to ' t UlU i_r_L ,m, 01 , e -. l e • .1 * 4: o I • view' i�rocess. The property boundaries are quite . . ; irregular, and present unique problems for develop ing,. a , usable layout for the site. Due to the unusual configure- • Y . t ion, access ib i i i t to buildings and Placement of structures n in perking areas becomes more d i f f i c u l t with respect to existing city codes We have been able to meet a l l of the requirements of the City of Tigard zoning Code in this . regard, With the exception of the landscaping requirement. The required amount of landscaping for this project is 15 f • percent. The grass sit e area encompasses 42,115 square feet, u i r e d landscaping' and the re q andsca� in area would therefore be 6,317 � g square feet. We ere proposing to provide 5,680 square feet, which represents 15.5 percent of the gross site area. ether efore requesting an administrative variance of .. thisrlandsca in requirement 'in accordance with the attached variance application We are providing more intensive e . landscaping within the areas or the site than Is b q by coder- an& we will also be landscaping some property wiThin st`n r i ,..ht-of-wa. which i hcreases the gross area the existing g g 9 Y� landscaped as a part of this protect. We assume that being h l otints will taken into consideration ih the review p t k n these points will� be '• , of the variance application. • 4. During the pre-development application conference, we + install sidewalks along the e loin I discussed the re uirem ht 5 frontage for the length of Center Street. The site Property Plah that we ''have submitted' proposas that sidewalks be extended along Highway 99W from the pr op osed curb access ess t o this state highway, and then extending e est and north aroun d through the intersection with S.W. Greenberg Road. The s i d e walks would extend continuously along S.V . Greenberg Road, M around the Intersection with Center Street and up to the " curb cut into the project oh Center ,Street itself. Beyohd the curb out, we would r � , e to simply widen the strie�curb l feet from theoc �, � � ehterline� and then Install curb a distance 17 would leave strip of land 7 1/2 feet In and gutter. u a width wi thin -he right tt-of wa , from the back of curb the property line, to allow'i for the future construction of • M1 w u,.-...,,,w. -,si.•.n•, ,.a...,. , ,,w.. •,:.,, ...:..... .... Vii.,.•, .,.....,.r .. , 1„ .,_. ., ,.. ,...W,«., .,.w, . , 0 : 1 • -. .w.,+u....w .t.id,+-,.w..�..��r.... �.,�Gl.....t1,.i.:..,..,.,.Few.:....;i....,..n.,"»;+a.,»w.—+i.+.:..:.:.r.«w:l..w:....u..+..ri..4:...,,.:J..wa»«'.I..-»..µ..,+..,..w,NSA...,--.,1,.:'..�fiao.,......4.=[..;..•.'-,;.i ..j.,�:.:.,, ,I,.%w',.7Y.:;:--,',..,-+.»w.uli:-.,-: 1 • P' O f Mr. Keith S. 1. i den Senior Planner annex Community Development Department -5- January 31, 1986 sidewalks in this area. Our reasoning not to install the sidewalks at this time includes the following points. a. As indicated earlier in this letter, the developer 1 already being required to participate in an excessive amount of public Improvements due to the configuration . ai• the site and the extensive' 'frontage) I f it is not , absolutely necessary for the public health, safety and welfare to install a sidewalk along Center Street, then • we would propose to delay this construction. This • would provide some relief for the developer in re cognition of the Unique configuration of the property and the hardship that it presents, which is not applic- able to other parcels in the area. b. We are proposing a retaining wall along Center'Street 4' for most of the property, as shown oh the site plan. r There will therefore be no access from the site onto • . tenter Street for vehicular or pedestrian traffi c until near the intersection with SdW1 Greenberg Road, There- r fore, ' pedestrian movement will not be encouraged on y this side of the street. This would reduce the geed for a sidewalk at this s location. c. Sidewalks do not exist west of the subject site on Center Street on either side, and there are no side- walks on the north side of Center Street adjacent to ' ,. • the property. All of the businesses and houses which ",r • exist along Center Street lie to the north of Center Street across from the subject property, and the '' appropriate place to i nsta I l . s i dr-a l ks I n the future would be along the north side of the street) If side- , walks were installed only oh the south s i'de of the• street adjacent to the subject site, this would encour- age pedestrians to potentially cross in the middle of the block on Center Street to reach the sidewalk, which wr.;u l d not be in the best interests of the City of Tl'�ard1 I , d. T Center Street is-not considered Significant, Traffic anC since it is a relatively minor access street compared with S,Wy Greenberg Road and H i cghway 99W» There f care, the need .for a sidewalk along S.W. Center Street would be limited to provide for adequate Pedestrian 'safety. • • I I .. r I .D. ■ , e M —+ Jr..w.:a i•xN.+Jwhri tl' r • aI {(J' el Tww•.Y.1 J r Mr. Keith S. Liden Senior Planner r , 6 r Commu n it y Development Department -6- January 31, 19 r r . I Please review this reasoning and the information provided, ' and determine Whether or not the requirement for sidewalks along Center Street can be waived for this project westerly r 1 of the curb cut near the northeast corner of the site. t • 5. Another issue of concern during the pre-developm ent review iew confe rence related to the proposed "right 9 ht �n/r g ht out" curb r b , . . e the l southeast corner of access to S.W. Greenberg road near ,' the property. This curb access location is considered quite critical to the successful operation on the site and to limit traffic conges+lofl, once again, within the site itself and at the other Two access locations. We' understand your ' concerns regarding potential left-hand turning movement for "' traffic frying n to turn left info the site northbound on S.W. r I tra f f q ��r, y Greenberg Road. We would therefore propose to install a limited length of "C" curbing delineating the northbound and i southbound lanes on S.W. Greenberg Road for a limited distance north from the intersection. The curbing would not . prohibit access into and out of the bank parking lot east of the property, but would prevent left-hand turning movement into and out of the subject project. At the same time, it r, would allow for the movement of southbound traffic on S.W. Greenberg Road into the property to avoid additional vehicU- , Iar movement through the intersection with Highway 99W. It would also allow cars entering the subject site off of r Highway 99W to park in front of the retail spaces and then r u exit the property at one of the two locations, thus giving Ir an option to the customer, rather than requiring a l l of the traffic to enter and exit the site at the same location. 1, , c � y h the rohfi �ati on o f th e p ro�ert limits the layouts P that are possible for development-I of the r site, and curb access onto the adjoining streets is critical . ;: for the successfu l deve l opment of the project. I f the center curbing proposed on S.W. Greenberg Road would e l i m i n- a t e the majority of the concern of your Transportation (department for traffic movement on S.W. Greenberg Road, then we would hope that the curb access would be approved as I shown» a request for a larger 6. �'it�aiC , ,the application includes � I. sign than Is normally allowed under the zoning code, ehcom- passing 105 square feet. The reason for the request is { two-fold. First of a l l , heavy traffic volumes at the inter- , section and the relatively high speed allowed on Highway ' 99W tends to l i m i t the Perception time for meta r i sts near the r , I✓ Y I I y,t�k r r y, r y„.. .. .,..:..J..iii...1,....:..:;-+-.w+-,r.,,......:l::Ni-4.n...uaul.;wl,....rr.•..u,xwV-„al!' .«%..-.L' ':IJti`-.�NvkM.w.:1:aJwH.F.(r.JI.:A'+.«4.•.IGr+✓:'wCU'.xJr«A...v.x....akrwLL44....1,..In 4wJ.:uX.o-. 4.wT:'+1.wJ..:.-4.aJ".:.44rJ U`sk-.'.Y.',:s.+:+i.A..m!Y,'w.iR! .. I A • Mr. Keith S. Liden Senior Planner Community Development Department -7- January 31, 1986 site to become were of the project, and due to the channels- zat i on and intersection control at S,W. Greenberg Road, the potential customers of the propertyrE 'businesses may not realize that the business exists unts they are past the property. It is therefore necessary to obtain as much advertising as possible to allow people ample time to com- plete their lane changes and enter the property. Secondly, there are a number of businesses built close to the street on Highway 99W, and there are a myriad of poles and other obstructions which limit .visibiIIty along this street. Once again, in order to obtain reasonable exposure, it will, be , necessary to achieve a larger sign area to the extent allowable within the administrative guidelines of the City of Tigard. I hope thi s Provides you with a com lete package of information necessary to review this project. If you have any questions or wish ►o discuss it in further detail , please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. I certainly appreciate the assistance our staff has to us in the pre-design effort on this project, X206 that your t f provided p g p � and ,I look forward to a successful development approval within the next 30 days. Thank you. o r . Res ectf ' p y , Thomas A. Barghausen, P.B. President TAB/5m 0152.06 one As Noted Lc. M r. Barry Gr. amore, inc. (w/enc. ) Mr. Bob Beaupre r, Gramore, Inc. (w/enc 5 . Mr. Dennis ''J Donovan, Bar hausen Consulting t i n g 9 5r� i neers, Inc. "g� . I , • 4 pp .# ..r..«,.,„„...,...,.. _ ,ti..w.a.- ,,.r4 ti.:,,..,,rr..s.,.i:.,.-+I,.u... .,i...,a..a7.:•1 ti..«....._ 4.«..'+7.•.i.L4.k+.«.«.:, :+LN.,......lY'.ni1'-.ah:A,..a.Eu .«:ly” i-ia.+w«,.•s..-:.s:.,«-:u.l:.,.-.n,.-,::: n f /! • y a . ATTACHMENT TO GRAMORE INC., LAND SCAPiNG 'VAR IANCE , SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO `VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA This attachment provides th e summary mmar Y a arguments eats for the e' request for a landscape variance for the above-referenced project to reJduce the required , landscaping area by 1 .5 percent. The required landscaping for this . particular project within the zone classification Is 15 percent, or approxi-r mately 6,317 square feet. The requested reduction amounts to approximately 1 Q a1 percent of the gross s s re u i red landscaping area which is the l i m i t of the requested variance. The specific approval criteria for a variance, identified as Section "A" through "E,!' are summarized below. The actual amount of on-site area provided is equal to 5,680 square feet, which is 637 I • square feet Is than required. j - I c ion wi not be material detrimental to the + A. The proposed redo 1- w Y . purposes of the code or in conflict with any comprehensive p1 an I poi icy. The landscaping that has been provided is reasonably close to the required Iandscaping, and with the supplemental landscaPih proposed w1thin the 'excess right-of--way along Highway 99W, which amounts to an additional 4,300 square feet of area, we • would exceed the required landscaping percentage on the site i -self.. There are no surrounding uses of a r~es i dent i a l nature which would necessitate more significant landscaping standards or buffer areas, and for this particular project which is completly o ed by ublic streets the primary purpose of the landscaping ud P b n Y p is to develop more aestheticapl1 pleasing project in accordance p Y with general development principals. The specific percentages are no-I- necessary to buffer the project from surrounding properties E. This p artic Parcel arcel is unique to all other properties in the area since it is bounded on ,all `sides by public right-�of-way. The parcel itself is approximately one acre In size and not only has over 800 feet of street frontage- but if also has a long g � eq with an excessive amount u, narrow configuration which requires an excessive Perimeter landscaping, coupled ssive extent of off- sitelimp rovemenapplicant has no control over the property r �,I boundaries, which also makes it extremely difficult to place. buildings and Improvements on the subject site within the code regulations. As the property becomes more narrow toward to south, it Is necessary to increase the asphalt area In order to , I` - gain access to proposed structures. I f is clear that other i , properties In the Immediate vicinity are not affected 1h the same manner as this 'parcel , and this parcel must:be considered unique. , • , „ 1858.02 F1:�l C1 w i i �y. i . .... v a...•n:. ., . • n , :w,:u,..r._-a.w... , ._,a.w _.s....wa..::,ww... •- ....,....«n....'.:. a..««....,w+..,« ,...+.1-;r-. y:...-1..:ur,+,..a.,...sar....ti:-•...... ewu.• ,:,.u»...r.w......m.._«. tlw;� .C...::.u.u::.kuaAi:J.c.. N'Lh....J..•r:u..urt-:::u..r.-.a.✓.r:,•.xt.awra.,.r...,..r...i...w.v.sr C. The uses proposed are identical to the uses allowed within the code, and no variances are being requested. Extensive public improvements are being provided by the applicant for the surround- • ing street system, and this presents a significant economic burden to this particular applicant based on the property con- figuration. To the greatest extent reasonably possible, City standards have been met, while permitting the economic use of the land. The requested variance in the landscaping area is therefore bein g Justified u to offset the extensive public improvements being v. required D. Existing physical and natural systems will not be impacted one way or the other by the landscaping on the project and, therefore, the subject variance will have no impact on these systems. E. The �J applicant to he hardship that would be created b requiring the weed the code requirement is not self imposed and is due spec if i- ° cal l y to the fact that the unique configuration of the property necessitates careful review of development alternatives in order s to meet other applicable City standards. These other standards include access driveways, parking requirements, and other restric- tions. The variance being requested, which amounts to 10 percent of the gross amount of the required I andscap i rig area on the site, is the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship and Would probably not be noted by any surrounding property owner or rsoh in the area. In addition, the extra landscaping which will be provided by the applicant• I ant within the right-of-way w i ( ( help to compensate for this loss of area. III , • tt 1858.02 Ill r � r Wx ightS011 Pro zrtie s RealtorB i 520 S.W.'irmixiliill Street'Portland,Oregon 97204+(503)225-0 411 •1 • . February 4, 1986 ' • , 1,1i „ and Mrs. Andrew erb Prh olz 9620 !`: Avenue• 962t B.W. 90th 'A�renu . ' Tigard, OR 97223 , i RE: Gram or Offer er i , Dear Mr. and Mrs. Herberholz; i ;4`' certain applications to the City of Tigard sL .more` must bm�.t PP Grs -.- and perhaps Washington County in connection with obtaining i . ,, Washington s ite development approval and building permits. II, - � � • Please authorize me to sign ;documents as your agent to : assist , Gramore with these applications . x'' Very truly yours, WRIGHTSON PROPERTIES L,r` ^ I 1 k 1101e ® ; Thomas Wrightson • H r II f , AGREED AND ACCEPTED? f 1 ,,2'.12)r ewr B. Her er ho z f BY . a, .' .r F orence L. Her•er zv 'z i i r DATE: -- i . ii ,.... R•. .,.�,. .v ,., \ a ••^ + m ` Y ,, I , ail w.+.�,. .� ....,..ry ,.,,�.,n.�-w... .� .,v-,.wr.. .-,�•..,,.m...a....r•� ...wk.µ..-..,.«.;.r,�..w ..... d� ,..� 4, .,wko ..�ku,��,.[..w.n..,,.,-�.,;+ G.....NM1,::G...., �,...r:—^�d.+.L.,.L:d:.:u«.1..,.F:....4.y....w.a+.4�.a..,w`ti'd,J7i.,s.:.4.:a.wh,,.::i=a,,:ul+a.r_ww.a..-..a.Nr.x.uar..,..::n,.. , (: Wrightson Properties f, Realtor® 520 8.w.Irani/an street•Portland,Oregon 97204•(533) 5-0411 • MEMORANDUM � TO: Goodell/Vincent Owners FROM: Thomas Wrightson DATE: February 4, 1986 , RE: Gramore Offer Gramore must submit cert ain applications to the City • of Tigard �{ , - and perhaps Washington County in connection with obtaining site development approval and building permits. ft • Please authorize me to sign documents a8 your agent to assist ' Gramore with these applications. • TWlp 4 ' AGREED AND ACCEPTED .• f ' DINE I , ....„74., .,I."..J.,-.»,t:..+.u!-..... ......a,.,..v.. ::twa..�.-I.....� ,...l.�.i..lw:u.,.. .w+a....Y.�.:�.....+.,�wt.,.ast � 1 Wrightsoixproperties 520 9.VV.'Yairm.h1]1 Street M 'oirtiLoid,Oregon 972h� m(503)225-0411 MEMORANDUM TO: Goodell/Vincent Owners FROM: Thomas Wrightson DATE: February 4, 1986 RE: Gramore Offer Gramore must submit certain applications to the City ty o f Tigard a r c and perhaps Washington County in connection with obtaining site development approval and building permits, authorize me to sign documents as your agent to assist Please antho g Gramore with these applications. TW:lp Enc. II { • . r ;I AGREED AND ACCEPTED - DATE: L � II �•♦ K : I � 4 7' I I p ti, r.ub:....«A....:JI...e.w..-.»N pFka.,i,,,r s.... .w ,-.n..h..-..{d ,.:'a'+a ••.nY.ii..•LV.,.w. ..,■,1,. .n.w.w,ll1«xu..w..rx "'"'i 4 ( k'' t WrightsoY Propertie , Realtors . 52 S.W.Yaitihill Street•Portland,Oregon 97204•(50:31 225-0411 t MEMORANDUM 1, it n • TO: Goodell/Vincent Owners E,, FfOM: Thomas Wrightson � ,,•'''' j 4 DATE February 4a 1986 RE: Gramore Of i.:er • Gramore .must submit certain applications to the City ,of Tigard ' G�ar�or ; and perhaps: Washington County in,connection with obtaining , site 'develo merit approval and building permits. 1,, p Please authorize me to sign documents as your agent to assist . Gramore with these applications. Tw: ip Enc. AGREED A4„r I AC,PTED y. �iw x • Ilk RV 4 DATE 4 ' n , i I .,4. I,a..a,4...�,+,..«N.at.-a,�f`lrrr...,-..%..�,s» ux.•n..l..S.�t:i. m.-w�:a.G'u....,.y.,..«-,..-.....«-�.,«u tl ' y r n_,4�.+«.r r.r....V.At.r rv1«•'r++.•,•. r.4ni �. a a... -w.•k w4.iu .+ -•x —.T.h... H�...: f + .I...e+ «! �.a�W.H+-JrP..:np 41r�..':—,Lr Mi �,i. I r,• ■ ,, Wrightson Properties Realrtor® ' 520 S.W.'Y'eanhill Street•Portland,Oregon 97204•(503)225-0411 ? MEMORANDUM , )', z • j TO: Goodell/Vincent Owner • FROM: Thomas Wrightson I I , DATE: February 4, 1986 , Gramore Offer , R E. Of ,I Gramore must submit certain applications to the City of Tigard 1' and perhaps ;Washington County in connection with obtaining ik site development approval and building Permits. Please authorize me to sign documents a8 your agent to assist iy Gramore with these applications. TW: l p ' I ; I I AGREED AND ACCEPTED , � II 1 I I i I j DATE. � f tt i r jt I L. • �, .s"aw r....:.a,u-��tw- ..,- +.,..,.a.,'>i.,,,.,....'.,�w,a,,. w.0 a.�,,,.aws:SJ.",�...,.,,a.,:!lts�,lea.a!/.•..:a".:.,.t...�..w...�.z.e.r..i.ar.:.,a;,a�aw..:�t1 Wrightson Properties Realtors 520 S.W.Yai hill,Street•Por ,nd Oregon 97204•(503)225-0411 r , M E M O R A N D U M 4 • TO: Goodell/Vincent Owners FROM: Thomas Wrightson DATE: February 4, 1986 RE: Gramore Offer Gramore must t ubmit certain ain applications to the City of Tigard and perhaps Washington County in connection with obtaining site development approval an d building permits. Please authorize me to sign documents as your agent to assist i Gramore with these applications TW:1p t, L , Enc. I �I . AGREED Al ACCEPTED �iy� � ~ F BY: DATE• • 1/4. trs, i i I• + �, o I �I 1• ` T io- V h • a_.i_„ ..,....s -.;.iw.. �„w._ ..a...I ..n..a3. _ w+xdt2l,w:.�.�c, »..,...ti.w.+"w+'�:4ti�".1..�•' .4tiX+".14y?sl atiiiwi.A...i(iiG'Ir.i�w+ie4!klYioil'. w:. z5(-ZAA- s I rry INI C. 1i'`'7 IV C,. 1/ SEE MAP ,., A?, 0 S i 3510 111,11200 11111j1 3,./8.4Q' --,_ • III■ //.Y • -. . SlwE ' • i 13° . IS, i ,•lam I on I, 400 DIVIDING LINE N 1/2 AND S1/2 e**/' • JAMES HICKLIN DL C. 37 iIIIi600` 5 • . ff � 0 i 00- �. ., I . ,1 ,\ 6 � tC;S:/10+13a921, —1'.,.,05:0 ✓. 700 7 I00I ' / - 4 .3,4c ` ,, i ' \ \>43�AC4 ;r \\ \: 80�a g `", I � M `� .. ,� \ : ,,��I I) III I .a 9 00 10 ''" ' \ ' 30 i,, I1IIIII n c,'" 1111111111 �, � � 11'` iIL • \ ` 29 -1(► III / 111111 , � y 1111111 / 111111) I y � ? \'�` .111 i 2 1111 I 0 i I`.000 � ., � ,,�. i � , `g,. ,,� Ill 1 '� Ilf�� �,,. .r IIII) IIIIIN '�N ti � `1III11�� � 111II ,i ' , B , ' 27 4 V111 VIII ,, ,,•• - ,,1, 1111" r (III1 • 13 `. 9 ,, ,, 26 IIIIIIII �� Illl111' 10 \ 25 5 X111111 / IIgist \ t"'L. ', \ ,,.y 111111 111111 1 I\_, � ' ,G` ' , 24 . 111111 11111 0 ®G 21'29 I 1 11111 ,111111 a, .bs .., ,,, 5100 11111 <I..' 111111 ,°�s, " , 1 1.2 I 1 a' c . .‘1'' P `' ' �� 903 4 -�. 90 6 ` �. s. ,, x ,', \ 13 .5 2'`,, 6. to ' I� _ wAc. ., 2.42AGa 1 •ID 1 ;� ' 5200. f ' Z I i�^AC 1 ''\ 1 , Ill' j e . �, 1 > '. . 14' 0 11111 1►I1►1 ,�- _� r ',. 111 'III a I\ f 15 7 20 111111 11111 ,"• , J .T i S� ,�0 , 5300 1IIIII11 11111111 2 301 Scat / r,' `I• 5 � 19 11111, Ill �'� �r. .� ��, 5500 t` II 111 I I ,.40 AC. ' ' l I►1\ III e - �-., r, ,,,IE3 ��>, 1111 � III 202 � r-_ ( I• w I �s f }+ 17 4.a.;41-'''''>'°11111111111111 •,� 11II+� �III 2 C c, �� �' l n 111111 III11:'\ (C S,t0.12264) 1 C.S•Nc.12263) ��'' rJ _icl ' .7.1''1�� . 111111 '< ,t�111/ � '' 4 / '4*.� s , l ;p�, } 4 111 I �� y !9 �O/ t'.',5,,.. , -,. FS'd 4 `�I. 4^,a �t.y IIIiI11 111iltlV 40010 p, .+�° 2300 ,4 / 2400 ' =.., '�; `�,\ ly' ,,'\. 11111111 1I11�II` 1 l�.�,%IC % /y 17.-lc ,��, ?cAc d){ Ii II� a s .1 ' 1 111 x II11� \ 4, :Set C.5,10734 .. 2 a 111 >„ ''''--e.. .. �� M �,� 4tl I 111"' \' '%C1' 2501 2 5 071 °° *b.✓ /0 d� 1, ___:_.., , . 18,,) L O j I f'l i2 � Y ti 2 jv 0 1 u u, �, 1 o' � . _ '!•i-I C \6 p p d 4I r "� 0 ' t 9° C ti : .,,I,° .22AC. . ''' � yg4 ,, • Ns lei host owsatrel essoese.st•t''rsmrol .r'. .. ei 11.04 pTpppua,asrasseM.enors'tame 8 5 0 2 3 6 15 r s fcps ales. Madly h►� p! d.y�a /rune ,ly s!4 hr and • ! bmw,.n 'red A. Vincent and Leonora 1 . . Ow d.df►, punted,eisahfnrd and eretng4 rsitnal trperse watu;e nl the exist,al tine "Y. Vincent , ,drrrase d,heel.al ter roiled than tint pr«e►ty,anti • ,,‘ freed A. Vincent & Leant+ra d'errnn, an undivided one-half interest as tenant.. in crtsecsr► , herNnmdlrr,Idled eta.,,bond pain; warn ESSEThi, . , .1 Par rata. ti eived'and the r nsideratn►n hereinafter stalest,th. rewrap'wlserrol herrhy r..ehrnrarladgv. ,the ltt.t poster hoes groomed,hargai ed,sYYid and conveyer',and by they'prrwntn does grant,barguca,sett pad cnnvey ante' the,,,NI nr.rtrtd'portr and son nd party's'Mreb,nuc`ovstiors•tn.trttere t and assigns all the estate,right and interest of (h. said+a.•rsscd at the titer id diedent'''death,and all the right,title and'merest:hat the said estate at said dr• smart ht 1,p,lotion.1 the Ins or otherwise may have therrattrr required in !lint ration road property sdtuatr to t • • •• a.4d,,,, ,41 Washi'iitnn ,State id Oregon,drM•nbed sotonna+;ro•nia. Each grantcc herein hcrcby t ' Y. 1,01Y140411y grdoted an undlvldvd 1/4 interest, together being granted an undivided 1/2 in- ••,.':1' i trivet in Ant to the folli ring: • 11 9ilrtiltl► one-Oust tif iaatt 21 testes 3, 4 5, h, 7, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32, ail in Black 1, ' •toV l4i,Mtt►N, lit the Count of WnY►hinpton and State of Oregon, EXCEI'T1NE T1iEREFRflM that portion i , . , ` Oregon by and through Its Highway Cornell anion, by , wog t and.•I dried.,r1'i i'rda,al August 9.„1939, flank 182, Pnge 341, and a1N,a recorded S...pte&er 1:4, ' ',' ! I+d II, f„t.1 1011, Page 4111. lived Records, ' 17, 1995, Probate 4Uo, •• 111Th 1sf1'1■ (Al Van In fillf111.n.nt of Decree of bistrabutian entered Piny t Pit 1 t''1 Waellingti)n Y Circuit • 4 $POTHhI ptllllflT ExistsNOT J , Wl I INNTrUMIINT C Tt Aaf OPHIAT*CITY OR COUNTY PLAN. RTM>ZNT TO VRRIrY APPROVED ll/RS. •' '(.. III SACS ro+UehICiIN!,cnr.riNGI CsUCUrt,rr,CNt,y.%1 S∎r1Ya H ,' rf1 AV PE AND lit')HOLD the name unto the said second party,an wn d second party'.lair'',suiYrs •In-intrreat +•.t and asdgnt Parr..' .Aunc ** ra I Th.I .,n4 elctiial rot sidernr►on paid for this transfer,stated in terms of dollars,le d atfllYr �■ f Nusi r1.d,the in'te/ai cr.r►dtdrraedil►era nn,unfs nl or includes otter property or value given or promised which is r�wean i erutalde3.00O0101('.,kind.tv'hwi'h.11 IN O'frNltLS WHEREOF the aid first party has executed this instrument;it lint paty is a corporation, Q ' N h d poised Ito a atpt■ttatr nano to be eignrd hereto and its corporate.seal allis.dl by Its officers duly aUthorired • ' /i►.raY►i►+i.► D. taaislet east its A•Ynrd ol Director. /1 , 14' I ,4. r , -1...,' j u � , I t ,, - Personal feeprearretatire dl ire t.Y,r$1,44•01,404*1)4.,wr�.a..=.d 1 of the Estate of Mae 5. Vincent boitleaesrd, NON M Mr•..+r i+mr.•n ii.e 0.A... d,..e....0,.ne.i.,i1Y,..id k.Mimed 6.r oat Oslo* _ ) STATE of Orr'GON,C..sov d tai ' t1 t A 1 f! tint t7at tDttld, 2 t/ • • s.a„,+i at It,,,iii i npt,,,ti I+Sl.redir+dJb a ""d•y a 1 t® R 1 wh.s.'seat 504 .awes, �w�.,, dd t. d∎ki sae tikes i Lear ill*5 POei J1. �' ∎rill 16 .e►tn0 rn t'erron ,euA par INow d!sort woo god tier rose ohms, p,.SJlsW 0#14, gat 5*.I.aNl.r le tFi ' sa .∎Y'i`4dp�atrt►al retraraue•tltat ivd,a a�..r.rr ,. ino.beaard dos.tnrea.3.tat d.M,. . a .,wp,medi w + , • rrtiitresq set.ararA deed Sad ti4.d rM hear idho.:1 ee 5*.t rotas d drsiwnsrii is .d Ail. ANNAN r it Tang....aaP.n asst raker oak Yaetrrwts d.sane elik ed . a , l Sot,.t''ada?aor,..whtiM by ewehiior art Ir.Feint.t,itw+tre'al stet aid,iN it'll,' ackiag.`MY41I.d Reid kaeriessrd eta ten bed 4r41.444ri ai,d Oat!*at . r` Neg.+aloe t+ i,,.. t d a . ' .., nit L i Alai_ *Atte Ow Qiigssa *Wary*Wary rti'lie tar dreier, iimirsimiessi sseilid4i*s Y ( kit a fnfOle5 nri..psis a Ptl ell A. 'Tikes' a Lan,hai rs I 'rrnn liVAtJ1C de aDIN!@Altgt t a lift tom• /`lid .11 �'>tlbt'1hi 6 I.et,iuiiis werron ansi tnea a 'gad Eieb664 attetioat n to: .wys.+ww for aaa.i ab sts06,/reertap)Malt •r WMA ►le...,.4f... • • .u..�.w+.+��.r........:.. t ns al w • • e • . MOiiri►sa h ate.rs► 9 a. ,.,r a. ,., aysag .isedi a 0,64 00t t Mi „ws esr etsMp114 44i00-id ol o'itt Dltu 400 ' *hie tip s siiihires OS he.salami.ri as I.a w„6..*55s5.5044 ∎ ! A Wh ale r. d 1(ttti►crra !P'*lrtrt,ii ' Ali$! 11 0Iig ..erg . a 01 dfE it o%Rpm :�i.� , ,2$ IN PIS V'' ;,�.' ' 11_911w CO91M1 tie99 h.e..i1..t et Ie.F.m.i . , . w r r•rr� eiee". . 1$1. 850l842S ,c.4. ' First interstate) Bank of Oregon, • KMOW ALL*48,4 BY ruins PRISxnf rS,That N Ai. °frosts• u/w d PKA let Rational ,,Bank of Oregon, I.A.J A , Trustee, t/wl ,heeinater clagrntw, e, • for ehu o nsisi ea swi hereinafter stosid.dove hereby g►antr bargain,*di and convey unto e..... I hereinafter Wiwi*tames,and woo grantsii■'e heir.,suersiosers and aeslgne all of that certain real property with the • , hammiest*. heeditamee is and heimertn/arlan fhereuieto belonging or in anywise apprrtainrng,situated in the Ccuntr • si Wililhington Erato of Organ, follows,n,&scribed as fo to.wit; PARCEL 1: An undivided 1/9th interest in the: • South 1/2 of Lot all ok` Lots 3, 30, 31, and 32, Block • j 1, Aingston, 'Washington County, Oregon excepting that portion de as 12035 eded to the State of Oregon for. highway purposes; also acific Highway, Tigard, Oregon, and ' i PARCEL 2: An undivided 1/8th interest int • Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7, 28 and 29, Block 1, Kingston, Washington . t County, Oregon, eskcepting that portion deeded to the Stater Y of Oregon for highway purposes. 1 The purpose of this deed is to record the partial distribution by . the trustee, under the Will of 8. Stanley Goodell, that occurred March ' i 6, 1977. I. II i't. Ul iPSCt IN$UllICIlNT.COMINUt Ott.tliPliwrce+'Valli(WI ., To Have and to Hold the same unto the said granter and grantee's heirs,eucceeaors and aeaigne himr. The true and actual consideration paid for this transler,stated in terms of dollars,is 8 None . �'. jeweler the actual considera hen consists oP or includss other property` at value given or promised which is of "kord corteiderrfion(indicate which),('(Ttao e.nirrete between aM eym!.alaW,it nut.pmts thto,aawki t,.ranee).Seo ORS IJ.O,ta.) pert a afM, ' • 1 In construing this deed and iihere the context to requires,the ainEJlar includes the plural and el!grairmaticaii I changef ilfneae tNl implied t o t rake the provisions hereof apply,equally to corporations and to individuals. ,'( it•coIn W he grantor has executed this inetruineM this 13th day of May ,1985 . • II to grantor,it has caused its name to be signed and seal diked by OP othotra,duly authi•ria.d thereto by seder of its board of director. First Interstate Dank of Oregon, N.A.,, . THIS INSTRUMENT,DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ANY ?rustee, !�. s ' nifty roodsZi.' PARTICULAR USE MAY BE'MADE OF THE PROPERTY 4 A/•. DESCRIBED.IN THIS INSTRUMENT.A BUYER SHOULD Ny Li t) �l Yi I •a asp • CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY O,61 COUNTY y x VERIFY APPROVED USES. .,....•......•.. i PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO •�� �" ,• I01+ai1aot EA0..ia..Mu..,.we. .,,v1.'r ruin D Hansen DlUltnaetlah . • STATE OF ON'EooN, ) I sTATE OF ONEGOII,carol),of ] retlt ►w May 13 Tt,.,f h,L oyd 0, litandatt mist. , 01aa/aesrement was.ciaowi,dted belwn officer „ate onarvin b. Hansen xmreotaen ,19 'br Officer otownoi Font Zxiterrtate task of Ore on: 11:, • e rpxatf .a kebab ISo innieratpi,a w mot) ail : ,„ ;,nlr�A r. ,...SAN r kycaawi a..TSS,i»dr t ti P(ig.;i i,CON v is e„ Nee*"°.`16/' ie lie Or.drm tloImr k ' Mt_C,r i 1,,Xt^(• j 1st Interstate Bank of Okegon,N.A., Trustee , ,...io apt tat l . P. Oi bOX 2971 T-�11 1 Portlax 1, Oregon 972®8 d� I I ....!O..MAO,Aki,i :,11 I Danadd W maaan Dime*, ,, Aasees:awsi stAnl•y �►, Goodsell, mid Visilion and Eit.ltblo*Saeger of case Pt WI*inaniwgle Iil VP*nee inoinniii - ' StiAlasii i w.i...wu.pi,,l 4, ►.iu,.i err,11 aatlO*MOW in tiviAt of It t0lli'IRs' . ' Mai d.,n iiesiii(bi "a 011amist it F. 0. iamte eti ti-ii Of Oregon i,ol,iiib.11-ii s, shafts Ommy a driers.b iiit se of sisiiai.Ma 1.ie.T io 9,n iaegaie amiii tat, tIIi et.IL4'.• Sea of Oril tan • ,., Aa 00* $171 tk.tX A q • a ti • /rt . ! i • '. ►a w11.400#444/4 NO WO---fi.Mds..i sr ca..nw) .•.,, ...,� 1 SAMIAwMDMO..soul 65018422 . .A: First Interstate ilisIr c of Oregon, W.A., (KNOW ALL POEM�►1'THtSBh'RESENTS,Thal Trtiatre, u/W (PKA lit. National ' ' ` , , Sank of Oregon, N.A., Trustee, u/w) ,hrre,nalfor rolled grander, 1 lee Ow conWderatrsn hereinafter stator!,doer hereby grant,bargain,sell and i,tn�s) , ri LAURtII G., FZRGUSON ., '• ' herese skier caned glrantee,and unto grantwr's hales,Surcwaatrs and assign*...l.1`t' :certain real property with Nn- Ii ; Seress wits,hares itanwsWo and appurtwsances theesunto belunging or in ea apperta,ning,Situated in ihi County .I • .. of wishing ton ,State of Oreaon,/rrctni..ad es loihrwa,to•wit; I, PARCEL 1: An undivided 1/8th interest in the: South 1/2 of Lot 2, all of Lots 3, 300 31 and 32, Block 1, • Kingston, Washington County, Oregon excepting that portion deeded to•the State of Oregon for highway purpose*: also • . • known as 12035 S.W. Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon, and PARCEL 2: An undivided 1/8th interest in: (I Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7, 28 and 29 Blouk 1, Kingston, Washington i Co,,nty, Oregon, excepting that portion deeded to the State j3; of Oregon for highway purposes. , i The purpose of this deed is to record the partial distri . 1 bution by the trustee, under the Will of E. Stanley Goodell, that ' , occurred September 29, 1980. , 111 ttIACt if•owr lOItN1,CW11114W r $Ce.n•')ll 01,r1-1141 4101. ' i To Have and to Hof;the same Unto the rain grantee slid grantee's heirs,successors and a..signs forever.• `. The true and actual consideration paid for this transits.,stated in terns of dollars,is$ None • Milloweviii, the actual consideration consists ad or includes other property or value divan or promised which is ' consideration(indicate which),G(rho errOotr.�aetwoa t the symbol.CD,It roof a p kstJe,should be dstNad,Sal ORS NA?o,) In conatrUing this deed and where the contet;l...;v requires,the singular includes the plural and all grammatical ' changes shall be Unfilled to snake the provisions hereof apply equally to corporations and to individuals. w ti In I4 itnees Whetted,the grantor has executed this instrument this 13thday d May ,19 85: $ ', it a corporele grantor,it has caused its name to be Signed and real el/lied by its ollicen,duly authorised thereto by • r order of its hoard of directoce, First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A., THIS INSTRUMENT DOSS NOT GUARANTEE THAT ANY Tens~ ..,w+• .6. N n'n'1ey•t IDode33 PARTICULAR USE MAY BE MADE OF THE PROPERTY 0,•7 el . M DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT,A BUYER SHOULD " Dy PO . , .. ,, .. ,■ CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY O ll• s , 1•1e • : PLANN«.w apMENTMO VERIFY APPROVED USES, .By, ,. �. ......... ..... . t ab� .DEPARTMENT TO ge , rr . Marvin D. Hanldel 'i."1.:• srArk of okafxiti, ) I rArr or otr`r'ooN,casary ash HuIinoreah 'w, • star laisgolre4i hrtnamaaef aaa ack ))es TA.k,it B 5,A,,,L I ay rsmrr 0. a dil l l, Tr a fkl. rertnl.ddrd Wiwi Hay 13 ,te85,byLlayd 0. handall, '►least off it.c'Et viroomoisowd byNsrl,in D. Sabath, Inveetaten, ai ttaas l° .air Officer awmaanet First Interstate Nick of Ore.:. 1 a esessaitiae,as laf.st!of 14+•fay h'ubIU for Onion Octave Pahl ON►lbi Fl 8OWIAAN � ) . ` i (SllAL) bt r wasasiwhai oap►ris. Ale se...Owlett ishau ►11 •RN PUBLIC OPE ss ) rs.egnwn+ . • in Interelte st sank of Oregon, NA , Trustee tsTATs or 0itedia t i .; ' ,•, 1I "Icti and, Oregon 97 208 cow*„iii�#,ca , 011 s ; ia'�:lie G. FArguabn e d temeci end o of ,II iNiiii• • I. ' me t � a„,,t.I,54,555[,.1.►n.n,.r .i<[ii sii'iinoi �nsaat**Mod en al S1 _ Ti ~ .. aOA . fail.aeaaAarr ` 'a.., 1 . dr.b1,iN b.us 't` l gitfAt ti Su nk of Oral on s /5,, �' ; 1 t,.ttl�... P71 T-1i ...1,' •.• 1■i Oir trai 97208 dM♦ LL �f a�rebneenenenMnaa. eanaafiAiarl11.ii,Ultimo*iiiiaa Jt IT . �1 20 A • tat 1Pt�'�trlli91 I;ti9s>i1 R1� Qxt�lttt+� ��I bbii ��.. .. �.' .P.�,r, T3. js I Je ,. i , �6 ,1 554 A • le . • o A 4 r 1 . • 0 • . . ' . .. . . • . I , • ' , ',,Li.,ss,,.. 4 r,,,, ,%,,.... ,_, ,„ ;,f,,,,,,,, . 4,v.,,„ ,, 4, ,,, . „r„ r . : - ' '''Pc.. '.4.1Vt;;FT4i,,t2, ","'..',. ,ik••■..'''' 't'''''.;1'.'l■i''''''..• ,,,''''' 1 ' A - . ', '" 4' i,F '' ',,',0 .,s,4 .,,, 0, t ' . • • ,,,s+ /... .'„,'.. , . , .,,,....:•-41.l''','„,'',iiil,i,4),.. ',.',1,'.•,,,,4F,',,,..,:r,, ..( '4,,°,,, k"if),,t. 4 ' ,,. '. —,f,' ..'0.11,',„,,,.0' ,,, r. . 4,,,,, 4 t, , ,. ..„, ,. o i • . "VIrlitair?i, ix amis.:. ma a'', Skin 11169 of „ ..ti:, '' . . , , . Tomo ts 11,971 302 1 .., . . — . , . . . . , . OR. 1 IN T CIRCUIT COURT OP TOO STAYS Of 0,11,011 . . . . . . .. a Pn TU RCOUNhT OP RSOLITNONAH , , ' . . ' 3 OlPATNt , OF POATI ' • ' ' ' - . , . ' , • ,.. •... • 5 In the hatter of tha Estate ) ' • ) No. 114.223 ', , ' , 7 1 . 81ANttY ro',I0ELL Also ) GoounLi, ) , : , . . 8 inj t.. s, sooDEL14, ) 0 ) ORDER AUTHORIZING PARTIAL ''t - , - . 9 Gwowalled. ) DISTRISOTI ON ' 4)-• . • "" ' • ., , ' . • 11 FIRS41.1 lepon the pc\'.ition of tho PortoRal ROPTOSOUtillti,00 , ,,, ,,. ' 12 the court find,: 'f.. ■ .‘, ' 23 1 T1.0 following partial distribution of tho SissotS , ' ' . y . , , A f ' I). • 4.\ • , 14 of tho agtatt can 1.e, made moo to the dovisess ontltlod thormto ' , , • 15 11p11 final distrlhntion of the estate without less to creditors ' . 16 or lailir to tho u8tut° ur to an interested Poro°oo: • „„ 11 srEcirie UEQUESTS 1 1 . . 6.4:1 18 1, ,2.50o. to the Rector, Nordpnit and Testrymout . . . • tw - TrIvit7 Perish, Portland, Gregg's*. 1, , • , • • ; 4 no:cetiaat's imtareat io the household furalturs and 20 iii.,enishiolts belonging to decedent, to Merl A. 641111.01110111, . .. • widow of said Jocodent. • , , U1STRISUTION TO T00 PERBORAL SPPRESIINTATI'M Al 9999%44 , .,. 22 uNDER DEcEDIr.:14Tis WILL ' , , ,,,',',,,,,,,..',,;'. .1 1 .... '040 1. C4311 In tha amoOnt of S410,000. . - . , . 24 2. Shar 1 ' A • • 25 s. als First National City Corporstioa coma** • . b. 400 Ganorn1 Telephone 4 Bloctronics Cerp.commos ow 26 ' c. 100 R. P. Goodrich Colspany caisson d 217 itooston natural Gas Corporation goons' • , , i 27 e. SOB iiiiterNStiomal Paper Conran)? seaman . 1 '.'' • _ 10$ .._ , F. ROO Pacific rektor 4 Light Company common 4,); • 28 s. ISIS Popo soft TAlboa, Ilic, tommeA stns ...47, ,, . • h. 1000 0 % Bancorp common ateek -,.... .,, , 20 i. 1/5 NWorm 4 Swasay CoOpaa, dionues stost , . .•• . • i ''''' j, 500 hoyierhitaisser Conpnap cotillion stock 34 RiaI Oropaet1 .. a. 2$-4% interest is tha Park Lane C..pssy •osttast. . doted December li 19460 7% tiriltireiti ii1i%048 . . . lettereft in balance of $12 JuIV.st, 7 i orjoe Amtkerteimg Partial 4iitribotioa . • oo, 1 . , I ' • . \ ,• •. , . 44,0 - ' '”' 4i*,4,,,.....10%.,4 ,,,,,16,. ,,,....L,,,,,, . . . , • ., ..0 i 7 t.,. : ' ' • .., ‘ ' . . 1 • I . . . . • ,,,.,„,,,,,;„,44,,,,,,,_,,,,,..,,,,, v.r;,,,4„,u,,,,,,,..N.•,2,,,,.......A..f. ,..•J.,,,,,..._4b.a,',At,kf...,.a.„,F.Y.w'''4e•Sf4.:.f:,"'P�keC44':w.."1,v,raawut,to i,...1 tW,,,,,,tk +rr Mrev' „L,..:,,,,,,,•,„4",,,,,,,.. ti , x fr, ` . .,�avw�.. ''�' *. vat . ' • , ' , „ 3O2 ' . . • . ,• . 1 b., intrr,.%* in pr:perty at Ixc1S N.V. Patin Highway T igardi, Oregon described sit ,, a Knteth y of', Lot ?, r I of 1et5 g,1Q,tfi end St, x f inrk I, K`inp'tun. 1r oKhiny,t t1te C;atarttr, Arasoai, i • e:rcRptinR that portion de eel•te ties '.Stets •f Gr•$0ll `� • for 'tithwtev rurpofaa, ,,�,:,. 1 . .• 4 C. intPrr.tia prorrmty described es: Lots 4,5, 5 e; ah t "i, P nh t 79. !title!” A, Kingston. Mlashinatort * ,. . rneint1', fl.qnn, excepting thet portion deeded to . 6 the ,tato of Orran4 for highway purposes. * •' . , . 7 , ,n I:. 1M Pacific American Resl estate roads. ,.!t ,. 1 titr•.1 nnrtnrrs<ttlp. ' 8, 1. 9 ;., of l Jri r,l.1, of tovr,nue has consented in writias 10 tan t .is ,listrii•lti. ,, • 12 ;, o;e., ,.'tL '+s^te will remain after the distribtattolt 12 heitin authorize tt to) -;,pl,ort of decedent's spouse end childr•ll • 13 H expenses of ac;:,,, ,i5trt.t iw n, :uli t,fc claims of all known ctsAitto>R• 14 of decedent Li' the estate, it i.,, thc:rcfore;, tr' a'. zi 1S E ritlit( l 1 , the. Slt:r:,.�nc I rupresentatii►e is mnt;itiad ttb �. , Xi.•p L; 16 distribute the „•stet! of titer estate Ma hereinMbova act forth. . :,a p 17 LiArl,t uuv+.wt,t,,►' _ILLb.., 197:. . ,µ....ea . 14Ufin <Qa 19 ,c l ai114_8m 5, tic Genn .,3E Tts-utr- i r7 11/1 -0�p-04 „ r 20 A TRUE COPY: (.. 21 f r 22)✓ r ■ .,.., .x. ,.. ..... A. 1 i(2..S `ri"C,i1.t.. Dew oc:U / 1 23, °xtto v for Pr,t it ionrr . . keN il-e-vv...s -,-24 PETITIONER: r b rp , , Attn: Cordon P. rnrk i;5 i Firtt National Rani; of Oregon " P.O. Roe 2011 • 26 Portland. Oregon 972t1a 27 Telephone', 225-2374 r . ATTORNEYS irn PrrtT1 0Wtit , , j 2° Huth L. terse*, Esq. 500 Pacific suitdin 29 Portland, Oregon 97204 i Ye4laphoae t 2211.4351 . Mr 1 • " r'1411 2 - her Atitlor 1 cinK Partial biitrdbltian €olh 966 p , ii, �..r I • • ■ ' :\- .t ai'i1 1 ,' 1 ,�� j,a`tl dl I d aZ.4';�'il!kr.t'¢�""�x'w Y�,4 k`l a 4 Vii'.1:5 j i • 'l �tY4,' w .a t ,.� � c�u atl.lati �u.F" GJ! r� ky l'-',,t.:71, 5 4 .,44.,.44; � , 7 t -..i. ' e rY ,. ". ,.. 4}Y•.+t-�.''9y° '''''1'v�t'''''' t#,a t9lr'.A t 1, ,I Fir r 11 M1 4.r e F ' , . J "r. t.4ia'F.tmkt`•n 1,'Yi ,a fey[ ?.j w�'�{i >�� ,7*,,S.µ e.iln- i1 ,iMt,,t, �I ,4 .It^.. �{`.. ,, r krt;.�di,�7{ "tyVJu��,4' �I�r �'�� �.d¢l�'t� -' ` ■ 0 • r •• . • . ' bo ,,.,4. ,:a;',,.r..:,,..t+•...', VM—.;;,ZUrtW.wYt,,,,9,,.3r-1.. :w7,..,t:e,rox4Ju.urw,.y,a.YU .lu ,,,.c..,;.,:,;Wrx.,Jtdatq..+ii.;0la,c,.u,•,+. 'Y.SVeiiN5,5trllU,;.::.xiMruKrU'H,GfM,':°:1tvrt:+k'+ti�"£u »,1.AA:.v�wN»t'Eq,iii'i.utEm.;ia•••'�w„A1.,.7,_w.s.....+:n.,i:..,e..�.axY..,t...,i�, •r G,.t..«_.ri4lo+u..ley n.�.w uui..,�Fw►t1..n.Nr..9✓AM . 1 • .• •r , . e a / 0 i ,• ' . ` .*: r." •�.•ti, 'lity: '' .t:',1 .•r=,,-,. i•.- .i :w. ,r ~•.,..:1'4 ,^xj ,i. :.• a+,%. }I r :•t'•i i'.'Nt;'' cC,� � to l .,••,sY,. 'I, hi ,:• %u Miiitri txS :• ,t' n •%'i'r, ✓' • .6' • ! `. • HtaM Mr IrW�IM1RY`"�'`X�f{Iei.Nwl=Cr�••irt. rrswr.rw�s wd waNre..r.o...�,wrc ar.wue� �Id•7,!-~--.- allt�AbrR7 tltil i'.'r INIM . I • 8.3017924. J.Y , PRESENTS,'/7tet— .•..._,,..,-.:...�,.........- PCfJf)f4 •MEN BY THESE _ rr, 1 .ALLr r ,. I _ ......�f-.»_ for I , :; la rainatter cm ld the grantor,lot the consideration hbssai smilter slat o gran paid by •..•. ._ ......_.•.. \ ,.•. :.1:L'R.:.dl...P..•„std:,•3►?.r:;;; ..L,..,:.ri��• .OLZ�i....!-cur,band,.,..s.ud,,...51te hot itwlter rolled t • r , ' i the grantee,does hereby'grant,bargain,stall and convey unto the.said grants*and grantee's hairy,ectoarasori arn1 • ! s ••. I assigns,that certain real property,with the tcnexrecnta,hat•editarryertt&,card eppurtenarc,°;•� iherauntct iyaftutging or�+- l pertaining,,sitoated in the'Caenry o(.•. tta,hir.gton. ..,and State of Oregon,descs.r+;sd alt loiloess,;to-wit: '' , , Lot'I and a portion of Lot 2, Block I Einveton iieshineton count3e, 41 . , ' Ore,,aon, norm'particulerly described as loves, to-wit: Beeixanine ant the most liortherX;v corner of saki Lot2, thence South ° 416•C5' Zest a1on�►, the t:or•theraster17 line thereof 25 feet, thence , • ' e, 5.: t ' r the 1 orthweaterls line 'of ��uth•9. -•C? Blest e+lor.c. a Y,:ine pd:Allel to t1- . • . 1 said lot 1,00°feet to a toint on the Southwesterly line thereof; thence• , 'North 4F•C45' ''eest el one Sout!�n'ester1v ,line thereof°', 25 feet to the •. .ins loose 'd:PStet�19 corner of said lot, •„hence alone the ltortFtuestr,rl;r 1 of said lot 190 feet to the't•�lace' of heetnt itig. •over • in spec&uaurpione,'wntwt utlicRnnra+on sew oa caner rantee'e heirs successors and assigns loeevet. ■ I, 1 Onto said rartterr and . Have to Hold the came g To H and H d g 1.•r”' And said grantor hereby covenants to and with said grantee anti gristlier s heirs,stimessora and atsagni,that 11 granntor in lawitul1y eeisetd in lee simple of the above.granted pretndeeeea,free from all enc.t nbrataoe s I `t r and that e the staid ,r erniaree and every part end parcel thereof against dhte lawful claims t I / a g r true eyed r,except thoII claiming under the above dexribed csrr,xrn'tbrancss. I i • • grantor w�a/!Warrant end orever de lend d 1 r and dernwxds t/eft persons wlrombxvs at�ttar aanrideratr poi g:this frwrrsla stated in tsrtrrtt ai dollars,is$...r.,.="'"'`"":77"7":":-..,... ' tpHowever, the actual consideration consists of or anchidat other property or value given or promiewf which is it . • pity u)tew nadderatiali(indicate*vhieh)+ (The senisnoe b.t•.sns the rradsohO eft rat rppilc.lrt.,a w'i d b.Mbter6i,Sag ORS$1A30,) I r �� BM dhd. � . ' In i:onstruing this deed and where the context so requites,the atngu/ar tnduder the plural and,cell gr II i r p p equally to corporation&and toaindtarduDJs. *meta Z t mores lu,ed apply Mct y ,the grantor has executed this instrument this. 43 cloy d,.•... Y•,,...•«.... •,....., ,r ' 1 In Witness�yet lied duly' , toners shalt 1a make the rove �„ 9 Where* tt one!Beal afitYd by eta duh authwtaod thereto L' ' •, arrler d its booed d dtri.eteie's. arse to be&igrud officers, . ri a corporate grantor,tt h4ts satived he:m ■ STATL OF ORZCiON, STATE OF OREdely,Cenni'al )0. I ,,i. Wa hit.. . 17 y lee. 0-.4-.4.. ' 1 t , krtrrtrr• ....•.. $hi?, .•.,__,.,) M+ws►r+.ilJr ea.pa..ad .set! xA.,:lard dw.....+ . .tech lye►htao.tt eel root 4w far ill,.tear,oil,ear stet the gwpw de atm l"rrewtuflr'eApexued Ib,.6.r.e eteer..>3.... 1 ,ptwdstt rt.rd , ,,iEtt,..e,'D•...r•T;bE:-':; .. r..� ' .. ._...•+air'olprs+d r—that Ili hotter the-•.--• __ )a . * ,: ..ifs.•.:"'u..,«T i . ...«t-, ..•..+-----.� y.:.., >e ui PA,fsiies. F' ,, t c rc✓• 'ackn.bdlr'oud ih.1eva drtrrev ”" . .., �r •.•-.-., sallied to ter,Y.ro/rw>id iriirnrr•e.ni is the tsr,o•aH ate.& i 1 `"r held se sold id Jon red that sold lrsiruinonr Nat thine,/reed..ifsa�:a bi •• 1 •�' .., / �*{r+d And 1F+et thtl tool aer.N. br.,.r.r, I Ii itierr.ttl eetard deed. led stud o.epae!rt i . ►7' pairreasr b,+atrrhwtty sd ifs baked d dirawtora;teed ewttr er� . ,4".'-e)n i.: , tl,.a,.eknn.vf.died geld Inetnin to it nit rots;sod?end mot il.od, i i,y,, '410" .a }et,: Dalai.are: I I 4 SEALC ', , , :, "-fit»» (OFFAL r SEAL) u J ells ' ` �i des L7ralete.e • , et Addle lie tYi .. R>a Jar 1 I• , Mty ieme+nr lei guar..t 7/15/84 lt •srtr.aree ere if...: • JI .1 t ° ,1 , STATE OF OREGON.' ; 1 err.«e.d•..i•ra r.le>l ta.e.a.a I trrtr'ly thin the w4ittln nicety- t .._.•,._....,».. ertlrrtt I Wei p.idsivcsd or t+fxeiirtl rail dNi � i .,..tsltiy ell 1 C bscc Bed awd.h7rta•tl dUrl Ywe,•...eN I ,:...,.,,. ..v'at � kn lrmolt/taelrMaiume No-,_.....•..r._-..&le)t I '. 0.•.1.•,•"•.,""°'".x /� /� 1 pn�et,r w�Or a"dealrripstl�we/*11./ '' 1 Y '. ''•1.:� .CJ.(✓� .�G'_'_'a ad...,x.ee irwx j / ...,• rn ii,-.tarts,-,- rltai i11ts., . i . i ,» .( ...6.... .P--.5",,./...--.19.0 "" .« — kiss oed ad Tweeds d wild onunf/r ' � eirt J:rewa •��.Y..• e ' r . . -.G) r �xd �+'i � ,,� ►V trate+ie my hlir,d lrtatl• , ..Y. i • ,1 ' f ( Y�*4"''."'"4•"..ur."'r' •a t,?asiix e•• . , _ A+' fl{ Wal d tf trld h iddd ddi WI i.e baisrm.el I&.M 1r bed.M i 1•ar+,o."sod... - • � i ,. ,,.•. 4i •.,Iw . � r` J . i ` i ,` :+.+ .•+i..+.iii...L.•r I ��,j►q'1/��"' �MiK i 3 , Y^ 'r + ` , I ♦ ,w � Y I ".wt .....•.4.•..r-...•. �.� lie 41, • • 9 .. M:.r,wdr.. ...-w++-•,;.,y .IrM..eVl,w,a+,pr.•r..,,afj/ "t'++•,ryy'.tr .",Cl, ,e•1 I 1101 �. ., ,.... ..,.. • r ,, a . , Vii..