Specifications (2) l o0<m7
7vo4sw ilvo= R4
las2Fuel — Regulatory
Compliance Review
Scott Stookey
Technical Consultant
Austin, TX
• Introduction
Plast2Fuel retained a Technical Consultant (TC)
to assess the hazards and model building and
fire code requirements for the Plas2 Fuel
manufacturing process.
E A site survey was performed on April 15 -16tH
which included a Hazards and Operability
Analysis (HAZOP).
n The basis for review is 2006 International Fire
• Code (IFC) as adopted by the State of Oregon
(2006 OSFC) and its adopted standards.
• Scope of Work
Perform a detailed analysis of the feedstock and
the refined PIas2 Fuel to determine its
classification in accordance with the 2006 IFC.
in Determine the Maximum Allowable Quantity Per
Control Area (MAQ) and how Plas2Fuel will
comply.
E Perform a HAZOP and identify any potential
failure paths that may cause a hazardous
materials release or introduce an ignition source.
Feedstock Classification
The feedstock is consumer plastics
including:
— Low and High Density Polyethylene
— Polyethylene Terathylate
— Polyvinyl Chloride, Polypropylene and
Polyethylene
These materials are physically altered into
a uniformly sized 1/4 - % flake packaged in
rz 2,000 pound SuperSaks.
: .
. . F eedstock C
II The feedstock is not a
hazardous material as tx r. �,
defined in Section
2701.2.2. - r _
_ . -. yam. ' ;\ .
• i The feedstock is Y e''' -
r i , ;��;',?�,! �• Ear
classified as a Class - ��
'yam:. _ ..�... : IV commodity. I t is a = ; � „ - ` .
F
` 1
• free-flowing Group • 0,. _ _t-,-,-_, ----•,-.• 0
plastic. (Section
2303.5)
Feedstock Storage
Plas2Fuel will limit
storage height to 12 -0
AFF in accordance with
the definition of High- � � it � , �
Piled Combustible
Storage in Section
2302.
• It Area will be limited by
the IBC for a Group S-
1/F -1 occupancy.
■
.. e ne d PIas2Fue
,,r _. ...... _______-----. -
IF The feedstock is heated by r' . - s � ` . '
the Plastic Recovery Unit : 1Ccs ,
(PRU). The PRU extracts a
variety of light and heavy �,, - t Itiliffi4 .1
molecular weight '.y K . 1' Illi 1 ll
hydrocarbons using hot air 1 d ( I
under vacuum. I
FE The process is a Use- i$
Closed System.
. LI Refined Plas2Fuel is a
Class IB Flammable Liquid
using the criteria in IFC -
Section 3402.1.
■ ...
.. e ine d PIas2Fue
The vapor is cooled f `. : .,_: :-
: 4
p T . .f
a � ' ..,.
and condensed into � =tf •
liquid at the primary �,� _________ - a*.,,,w, ..,
condensing tank T
at , M E l t ;1 ....- •.a•••+ ..... _ which is also a closed ` " � � r - ,„,:t ----÷-- ' -
�' PIas2F , R 0 0 1 - ,r. :4111
system ,, k ; t . �, . .3.
______._.
..
gi, The optimum design .■
r
of 4 PRUs .; :.,
simultaneously a, , ,-,,,,, s_
....
- operating rati n gproduce
p
. - ,,
..
. . .
7.5 GPM.
, ....
.,
, ,
.__. .
.._
._
..
■
.. e ne Plast2Fuel
If The finished
Plas2 Fuel is k ii i ii i i.:\ 1
F
transferred via a Iii,R„t , , _,
,,...
..
pump to a 12,000 ; , �, .. - 1
J
fit• , ,_
a l l o n (nominal) U L
g . T 4. y
142 aboveground
•
_ ,-----...---7=-- - '�
storage tank with
secondary �� .
containment. . , •
/ -
PRU •
(1of4) o
s • --- (11) .
Us Closed System
Storage
Approx. 31 Lbs. or.7.5
Gallons %Minute ,
_ - � -�
t -1 .__ _ _ ._.__._ .- - � -- - - -� - == - - ,___�� � - . - - -._ ..- _ -- ., - -- -- _ _.. West Wall
12,000 Gallon UL 142 AST
\l1/hat is the MAQ and How Will
Plas2Fuel Comply
KI Known conditions:
— The refined product is a mixture of Class IB, IC, II and
III flammable and combustible liquids.
— Based on its flash and boiling point temperatures
Plas2Fuel is a Class IB flammable liquid.
— The process is a Use-Closed System.
— IFC Table 2703.1.1(1) establishes a 120 gallon MAQ
for this class of hazardous material in a single control
area.
— The amount in use (7.5 GPM) is less than the 120
gallon MAQ. Therefore such a use is allowed in a
Group F -1 occupancy in accordance with IBC Section
306.1.
Hazards and Operability Analysis
E A HAZOP was performed by Plas2Fuel to
determine any process upset conditions that
could result in the release or release and ignition
of refined fuel.
Vi The HAZOP identified the following:
— Loss of power to the vacuum pressure system and
circulating air
— Loss of vacuum pressure
— Fire case (emergency venting) for the condensing
column
— Loss of the Programmable Logic Controller
.6' - ,2o 9 a ap 7
HYDRAULIC CALCULATION
SUMMARY SHEET
** *Manufacturing Area * ** R EC E IVED
'PROJECT NAME: - -> PLAS2FUEL Corp. OCT O 8 2009
PROJECT ADDRESS: - -> Wall Industrial Park Tigard, Oregon CITY OF TIGARD
DRAWING SHEET NUMBER: - -> 2 of DATE CALCULATED: - -> OCT BUILt D IVISION
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: - -> City of Tigard & Dee Lockwood
SYSTEM INFORMATION:
Size Of System: > 28,560 sq. ft. +/-
Type Of System: > Wet
Vol. Of Dry /Preaction /Anti - freeze Syetem: > N/A
Available Pressure > 108.8 psi
Required Pressure > 56.5 psi
Safety Factor > 52.3 psi / 48.1%
DESIGN DATA:
Remote Area Number: > 1
Remote Area Location: > Fabrication Shop
Occupancy Classification: > Ordinary Group II
Storage Commodity Classification: > N/A
Storage Height: > N/A
Density: > .20 gpm /sq. ft.
Area Of Application: > 1500 sq. ft.
Coverage Per Sprinkler: > 130 sq. ft. max.
Type Of Sprinkler Calculated: > Viking SSU
Sprinkler. K-Factor: > 5.6K
Number Of Sprinklers Calculated: > 13
In -Rack Sprinkler Demand: > N/A
. Number Of In -Rack Sprinklers Calculated: > N/A
. Hose Streams Inside + Outside: > 250 gpm
Total Water Required (including hose): > 578.5
• Flow And Pressure At Base Of Riser: > 328.5 gpm @ 45.4 psi
WATER SUPPLY:
Static psi: - - -> 109 Residual psi: - -> 102
Flowing GPM: - -> 3509.0 GPM @ 20 psi: > 13,869.3
Test Date: - - - -> March 23, 1998
Location: > 8185 SW Hunziker Road
Info From: > City of Tigard Public Works Department
PUMP INFO:
Pump Type: - -> N/A PSI Rating: - -> N/A GPM Rating: - -> N/A
INSTALLING CONTRACTOR:
Name: > Viking Automatic Sprinkler Co.
Address: > 3245 NW Front Avenue, Portland, OR 97210 -1509
.Phone: > (503) 227 -1171 Fax: - -> (503) 227 -1552
Designer: > Jake Perdue
Oregon CCB #: > 64837 Metro Lic. #: - -> 28116
Calculations performed by HASS 7.9 under license # 38030713
. _ r
.. Li C7
O
. D H
• WATER SUPPLY ANALYSIS y to
..
120.0 V Static: 109.00 psi Resid: 102.00 psi Flow: 3509.0 gpm y 1 ._,
• LEGEND r o
m ---,
.. � .
•
L 1 108.75�psi = 578.5 gpm m N o
Required pressure 0 o
2 56.52 psi @ 578.5 gpm t M
100.0 A. Source Supply Curve_ 1- 0 - :,
B. System Demand Curve y
G . - • ru to
a to
n ro
U rr- z 7-I
G z .-
E n to x
80.0 m r
H M -
H ;C7 •
P w z to
R G) K
G to to -
E a ti
S n 3
S 60.0 _ . t x
o U 2 n • • i-<
•
1-•ra t:7
R o
al
E C7 C, • a [ r
H C+] H
tD / (')
( 40.0 • a C']
p to z •
S y t-I
i O K
Ill to •
/ H
C+7
• 20.0 • .
. - C)
. H
IO
•
n
H
• 0.0 B Fri
FI
. n it,
• a
En tq
C7 tD
ITJ
- 14.7 N
I I ! I I t 1 I
' 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200 3600 4000 .
FLOW (GPM) .
SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 3
DATE: 10 /6 /2009MENTS AND SETTINGS \JAKE.PERDUE \DESKTOP \GEORGIA PACIFIC.SDF
JOB TITLE: Georgia Pacific - manufacturing area
NFPA WATER SUPPLY DATA
.SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D
• NODE PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ DEMAND PRESS.
TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI)
SRC 109.0 102.0 3509.0 108.8 578.5 56.5
•
AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS:
TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 578.5 GPM
TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 250:0 GPM
OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 0.0 GPM
TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 328.5 GPM
NODE ANALYSIS DATA
NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE NOTES
(FT) (PSI) . (GPM)
1 25.0 - - - - 27.1 - - -
2 25.0 - - - - 26.4 - - -
2A 25.0 - - - - 26.3 - - -
'3 25.0 - - - - 26.4 - - -
4 25.0 - - - - 31.1 - - -
5 25.0 - - - - 32.9 - - -
6 20.5 - - - - 34.0 - - -
•7 20.5 - - - - 32.3 - - -
�8 25.0 - - - - 29.5 - - -
9 25.0 - - - - 28.5 - - -
.101 24.5 K= 5.60 18.4 24.0
102.. 25.5 K= 5.60 19.7 24.9
103 26.5 K= 5.60 • '21.1 25.7 •
104 28.0 K= 5.60 19.8 24.9
105 27.0 K= 5.60 22.2 26.4
106 24.5 K= 5.60 18.4 24.0
107 25.5 K= 5.60 19.7 24.8
108 26.5 K= 5.60 21.0 25.7
109 28.0 K= 5.60 19.8 24.9
110 27.0 K= 5.60 22.2 26.4
111 25.5 K= 5.60 20.1 25.1
112 26.5 K= 5.60 22.0 26.3
113 27.5 • K= 5.60 • 20.6 25.4
B1 27.0 - - - - 23.8 - - -
B2 27:0 - - - - 23.7 - - -
B3 . 27.0 . - .- - - 23.6 - - -
• TOR, 0.5 - - - - 45.1 - - -
•BOR - . 1.5 - - - - 45.4. - - -
U.G1 ' -4.0 - - - - 48.3 - - -
BF1 -4.0 - - - - 48.5 - - -
BF2 -4.0 - - - - 56.5 - - -
SRC -4.0 SOURCE 56.5 328.5 '
SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 4
DATE: 10 /6 /2009MENTS AND SETTINGS \JAKE.PERDUE \DESKTOP \GEORGIA PACIFIC.SDF
JOB TITLE: Georgia Pacific - manufacturing area
1
NFPA PIPE DATA
'Pipe Tag K -fac Add Fl Add Fl To Fit: L C (Pt)
Frm Node El (ft) PT (q) Node/ Nom ID Eq.Ln. F (Pe)
To Node El (ft) PT Tot.(Q) Disch Act ID (ft.) T Pf /ft. (Pf)
Pipe: 1 5.60 24.0 Disch 9.50 120 1.3
102 25.5 19.7 0.0 1.000 - - -- 0.00 0.4
101 24.5 18.4 24.0 1.049 9.50 0.183 1.7
Pipe: 2 5.60 24.9 Disch 10.00 120 1.4
103 26.5 21.1 24.0 101 1.250 - - -- 0.00 0.4
102 25.5 19.7 48.9 1.380 10.00 0.179 1.8
Pipe: 3 5.60 25.7 Disch 8.00 120 2.7
El 27.0 23.8 48.9 102 1.500 T: 8 8.00 0.2
103 26.5 21.1 74.6 1.610 16.00 0.184 3.0
Pipe: 4 5.60 24.9 Disch 10.00 120 2.4
105 27.0 22.2 0.0 1.000 - - -- 0.00 -0.4
104 28.0 19.8 24.9 1.049 10.00 0.196 2.0
Pipe: 5 5.60 26.4 Disch 2.00 120 1.6
Bl 27.0 23.8 24.9 104 1.250 T: 6 6.00 0.0
105 27.0 22.2 51.3 1.380 8.00 0.196 1.6
Pipe: 6 0.0 51.3 105 2.00 120 2.6
2 25.0 26.4 74.6 103 2.000 T:10 10.00 -0.9
B1 27.0 23.8 125.9 2.067 12.00 0.144 1.7
Ripe: 7 5.60 24.0 Disch 9.50 120 1.3
107 25.5 19.7 0.0 1.000 - - -- 0.00 0.4
.106 24.5 18.4 24.0 1.049 9.50 0.182 1.7
Pipe: 8 5.60 24.8 Disch 10.00 120 1.4
108 26.5 21.0 24.0 106 1.250 - - -- 0.00 0.4
107 25.5 19.7 48.8 1.380 10.00 0.178 1.8
Pipe: 9 5.60 25.7 Disch 8.00 120 2.7
B2 27.0 23.7 48.8 107 1.500 T: 8 8.00 0.2
108 26.5 21.0 74.5 1.610 16.00 0.184 2.9
Pipe: 10 5.60 24.9 Disch 10.00 120 2.4
110 27.0 22.2 0.0 1.000 - - -- 0.00 -0.4
109 28.0 19.8 24.9 1.049 10.00 0.195 2.0
Pipe: 11 5.60 26.4 Disch 2.00 120 1.6
B2 27.0 23.7 24.9 109 1.250 T: 6 6.00 0.0
110 27.0 22.2 51.3 1.380 8.00 0.195 1.6
Pipe: 12 0.0 51.3 110 2.00 120 2.6
2A 25.0 26.3 74.5 108 2.000 T:10 10.00 -0.9
B2 27.0 23.7 125.8 2.067 12.00 0.144 1.7
Pipe: 13 5.60 25.] Disch 12.00 120 1.9
112 26.5 22.0 0.0 1.000 - - -- 0.00 0.4
111 25.5 20.1 25.1 1.049 12.00 0.198 2.4
•
SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 5
DATE: 10 /6 /2009MENTS AND SETTINGS \JAKE.PERDUE \DESKTOP \GEORGIA PACIFIC.SDF
JOB TITLE: Georgia Pacific - manufacturing area
1
„Pipe Tag K -fac- Add Fl Add Fl To Fit: L C (Pt)
Frm Node El (ft) PT (q) Node/ Nom ID Eq.Ln. F (Pe)
!To Ndde El (ft) PT Tot. (Q) Disch Act ID (ft.) T Pf /ft. (Pf)
Pipe:.14 5.60 26.3 Disch 3.10 120 1.6
B3 27.0 23.6 25.1 111 1.250 T: 6 6.00 0.2
• 112 26.5 22.0 51.4 1.380 9.10 0.196 1.8
Pipe: 15 5.60 25.4 Disch 8.90 120 3.0
B3 27.0 23.6 0.0 1.000 T: 5 5.00 -0.2
113 27.5 20.6 25.4 1.049 13.90 •0.202 2.8
Pipe: 16 0.0 51.4 112 • 2.00 120 2.8
3 25.0 26.4 25.4 113 1.500 T: 8 8.00 -0.9
B3 27.0 23.6 76.8 1.610 10.00 0.195 1.9
Pipe: 17 0.0 56.8 2A 11.58 120 0.7
1 25.0 27.1 125.9 B1 3.000 E: 5 5.00 0.0
2 25.0 26.4 182.7 3.068 16.58 0.042 0.7
Pipe: 18 0.0 125.8 B2 • 1 120 0.1
2 • 25.0 26.4 -69.0 3 3.000 - - -- 0.00 0.0
2A 25.0 26.3 56.8 3.068 12.00 0.005 0.1
Pipe: 18A 0.0 125.8 B2 11.00 120 0.1
3 25.0 26.4 -56.8 2 3.000 - - -- 0.00 0.0
2A 25.0 26.3 69.0 3.068 11.00 0.007 0.1
1 19 0.0 69.0 2A 166.50 120 4.7
0 25.0 31.1 76.8 B3 3.000 E: 5 5.00 0.0
3 25.0 26.4 145.8 3.068 171.50 0.028 4.7
'Pipe: 20 0.0 89.1 8 13.90 120 1.8 .
5 25.0 32.9 145.8 3 3.000 T:13 13.00 0.0
4 25.0 31.1 234.9 3.068 26.90 0.067 1.8
Pipe: 21 0.0 0.0 34.20 120 1.4
9 25.0 28.5 182.7 2 3.000 - - -- 0.00 0.0
• 1 25.0 27.1 182.7 3.068 34.20 0.042 1.4 .
Pipe: 22 0.0 0.0 9.68 120 0.9
8 25.0 29.5 182.7 1 3.000 T:13 13.00 0.0
9 25.0 28.5 182.7 3.068 22.68 0.042 0.9
Pipe: 23 0.0 182.7 9 138.00 120 1.7
4 25.0 31.1 -93.7 7 3.000 T:13 13.00 • 0.0
8 25.0 29.5 89.1 3.068 151.00 0.011 1.7
Pipe: 24 0.0 .182.7 9 52.20 120 2.8
7 20.5 32.3 -89.1 4 3.000 E: 5 18.00 -1.9
8• 25.0 29.5 93.7 3.068 T:13 70.20 0.012 0.9
Pipe: 25 0.0 0.0 140.00 120 1.8
6 20.5 34.0 93.7 8 3.000 E: 5 5.00 0.0
7 20.5 32.3 93.7 3.068 145.00 0.012 1.8
SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 6
DATE: 10 /6 /2009MENTS AND SETTINGS \JAKE.PERDUE \DESKTOP \GEORGIA PACIFIC.SDF
JOB TITLE: Georgia Pacific - manufacturing area
.,Pipe Tag K -fac Add Fl Add Fl To Fit: L C (Pt)
Frm Node El (ft) PT (q) Node/ Nom ID Eq.Ln. F (Pe)
'To Node El (ft) PT Tot.(Q) Disch Act ID (ft.) T Pf /ft. (Pf)
Pipe: 26 0.0 0.0 41.75 120 1.1
5 25.0 32.9 93.7 7 3.000 3E:15 28.00 1.9
6 20.5 34.0 93.7 3.068 T:13 69.75 0.012 0.8
Pipe: 27 0.0 93.7 6 25.00 120 12.2
TOR 0.5 45.1 234.9 4 4.000 E: 7 22.80 -10.6
5 25.0 32.9 328.5 4.026 T:16 47.80 0.033 1.6
Pipe: 28 0.0 0.0 6.00 120 0.3
BOR 1.5 45.4 328.5 5 4.000 G: 2 15.00 0.4
TOR 0.5 45.1 328.5 4.026 A:13 21.00 0.033 0.7
Pipe: 29 0.0 0.0 75.00 140 3.0
UG1 -4.0 48.3 328.5 TOR D6.000 2E:32 72.00 -2.4
BOR 1.5 45.4 328.5 5.890 T:40 147.00 0.004 0.6
Pipe: 30 0.0 0.0 190.00 140 0.2
BF1 -4.0 48.5 328.5 BOR D8.000 - - -- 0.00 0.0
UG1 -4.0 48.3 328.5 7.980 190.00 0.001 0.2
Pipe: 31 0.0 Fixed Pressure Loss Device
BF2 -4.0 56.5 328.5 UG1 8.0 psi, 328.5 gpm
BF1 -4.0 48.5 328.5
Ripe: 32 Source 0.0 5.00 140 0.0
,SRC -4.0 56.5 328.5 BF1 D8.000 G: 4 4.00 0.0
BF2 -4.0 56.5 328.5 7.980 9.00 0.001 0.0
• NOTES (HASS) :
(1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 8.0 computer program
under license no. 38030713 granted by
HRS Systems, Inc.
208 South Public Square
Petersburg, TN 37144
(2) The system has been calculated to provide an average
imbalance at each node of 0.003 gpm and a maximum
imbalance at any node of 0.106 gpm.
(3) Total pressure at each node is used in balancing the system.
Maximum water velocity is ].2.1 ft /sec at pipe 16.