Loading...
Specifications Ott - :20 /0 - a0 /3 5 /35(00 sw ice« ay- V�SSE R • RECEIVED RING „..4 ENGINEERING - - SEP -10 -ZO O • CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING DIVISION STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (Screen Wall Support) Project: Tigard Marketplace Starbucks 13560 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Project No.: 10-037 Architect: the design COLLECTIVE 2303 West Commodore Way Suite 205 Seattle, WA 98199 By: Andy Derrick, P.E., S.E. Mike Visser, P.E., S.E. J(A Date: June 30, 2010 X 30 P 2010 �D '0 4 17 -• \ op viirz‘ Ise • CALCULATION SHEET Title: VISSER . . ENGINEERING P rof ct: TI GIP?..t7 NM) S - (11t5.0 3. ';-) ra; # Client: D Date: • Page: S Ft WAGS. Stw]I gr Wikb_ VEg G.5. 1¢ .F: ih As h . CA2. kM k \it r Is. .70 . S= i. o 1 / , ' 0 1 • fob ct FlcEpff (4) : R Ph • 0 2 1 / 11.1-5 - L 3-ct * S/J = : C.4% L1i/ (CASE Aug) 2. 2s 4 1.$c, Cc c) _� _ S JC E ( 2.o C s 74cm cotSste— ., • . A, Tt-Fls S t-1 fr Nor per' 6F SC CALCULATION SHEET Title: VIS SEI2 ;; ti- E NGINEERING ._ - PTOject: fl ( b TAP— Al� � T I ! -- -- (Ic)' - - - Client: 3X- Date: Page: 2 - Cod. 13 Is = 6.s M. - }s = :I .ss 4 s/h = 1 ; C'e= 1. S4 ( [assA c S Fc,A Ei'xt' =t " 4LL I I I E 1 1 t E 1 I F E r 3 • } i 1 •07 E 6)-0 t 6 (tl• old(. ).et.4IL)i = 3257 _} 1715t$tsmis - re MIS 3 arc LoAibia,ic.1 & Z. . 2. s \ Z. ).( 1 7. 4.z c t kkiki = _ ( 1 - G e d i e , f t - ( , ( 0 4 . 2 . ) ) . Z.6+ QG NOT PAg-T •S6 49a - s C • CALCULATION SHEET Title: V I S S E R \ �.y�l��p f ENGINEERING .--- P T ft JBameoca L.I b fi Client: D Date: Page: 3 \ 4$ fl96 Zed tr; -2.1A � • 3 4 4 4 ft; • - I •' I I 07.7q T 4 (y2 Tss/Z +1,$)(-,7-7,0) = ( ?i. 1 Y= 103-9 @ h = 16. ;s /z ° (*(11.3-5) • a c=vs t'' 4'r SlE, PEtN?t 17S Fe— (0= (2. X Ii ' - = (11.01)tlls j(1,s4)(4.syll.4s) = 1m, . . . , . . , . ... . . ,. .. . . • . . . . • I . GP • ' .. . . . G . . . . CALCULATION SHEET . . ... Title: VISSER • '..., :;;;; ENGINEERING Project : ' . S (10 - 0) Client: r-- • ..... Date: • Page: 4 A. 140.1.- PI:4 CF 5cce'a -7/ i .-- i I f I = MAX , Ltfk> "rt ?Mr g• 59 4 1 .... I 1.-, . I . . . , . - - i=txr tee /41E› , _ I efri-Iii. -,,_. r "RE.40 Jetztepietri3 . . . • ,,, 7tri: I 1 . R (:; (tz.' 5=1") X 4:-3 WALL: ii" ! (M 1 n I 71 ? )kt., Lc lo ! i . 1 1 C. 14 1 " 1 7:1 Mi i I - TI , 1:t5R PcIsr I E 1 1 4 - 6 r. Nc. 1V.4:131" j 7 1 ..: I , i - I &LID 1 • ,.. • • CALCULATION SHEET Title: V I SS ER' ®� �a..�`�� 5 `1 l+ f } ENGINEERING - - - .qp PrOoeCt: , e 64=ki�.a✓ ' l ^�7T)•� _� __ . Q _ O .. Client: .bG • Date: Page: S S''( 141$ PEC.M - 4 X S =Fe 'FCPRI* S$AAWJg Ca C N114E .X1014 ftANkS " b lv � z (Ha 0 i) ( ?SRI/ 411) = 13 . p$. PkAuNik (13 Z P'Y 3.s /Z = !9.3 4 => z thLTi # I - Z'- MA/1-i Vi 45 Foa °-- PL..ANtg V I S S E R Project Tigard Starbucks (10-037) l a ENGINEERING . . • [5 - • . Client the design COLLECTIVE . Calculation Sheet . Date: 6/30/2010 • - Page: � n Title: , Typ. Pole Foundation for 21' x 11'-9" Screen Wall _. • - . — - - - - - • - -- - .. .- .. -. .- - • • Pole and Pole Foundation Pole Design (Total Lateral Load) Total Shear. 1079 pounds Number of Poles in Structure: I each Shear per Pole: 1079 pounds • . , Height of Pole: 11.75 feet Height to Load on Pole: 6.5 Moment per Pole: 7014 foot - pounds 1 Material: HSS Column Sx: 3.9 inches"3 ' • Size: HSS 4x4x1/4 Ix: 7.8 inches''4 fb: 21580 psi - ok - < 30360 psi E: 29000000 psi ' Deflection: 0.75 inches = L/ 373.73. $ • • : e Desi: ' rnd Load on Po1e1 • .0 o Wind Load per Pole: plf • • ., eight of Pole: 1 feet •- Momen : -, Pole: 1 foot - pounds M - .. HSS Column Sx: 3.9 inches^3 . Size: HSS 4x4x1/4 lx: 7.8 inches^4 • fb: 2 psi - ok - < 30360 psi E: 29000000 psi Deflection: 0.0. , inches = 1/ 1.2E+08 Nonconstrained Foundation Design (ref IBC 1805.7.2.1) • Point Load P: 1079 - pounds h: 6.5 feet • Allowable Lateral Soil Pressure: 200 pcf (Table 1804.2 - no increase taken) Assumed depth of embedment 6 feet SI: 400 psf diameter or diagonal of footing, b: 2.5 feet A: 2.52486 required depth of embedment, d: 5.676 feet Uniform Load . P: pounds h: 0.500 feet Allowable Lateral So' 'ressure: 100 pcf (Table 1804.2 - no increase taken) Assumed depth of em , -.4.,- : 1.000 feet Si: 33 psf diameter or diago, :. of footing, b: 2.5 feet A: 1.' r" depth of embedment, d: 0.13 • feet Required Depth of Embedment 5.676 ft • V 1 S S E R Project Tigard Starbucks (10 -037) '�;' ENGINEERING W;, Client the design COLLECTIVE • Calculation Sheet : . Date: 6/30/2010 Page: -1-- Title: • Typ. Pole Foundation for 6' -6" x 11' -9" Screen Wall _ ._ _.. _ _. _ .__ _ _- _ - - - _. _ - . - -__ -_ _ _ _ - __ _- -- _ ___- _ Pole and Pole Foundation a P f CF sccee Pole Desi • otal La • -: Load Total Sh - .. 890 pounds Number of Poles in Structure: I each Shear per Pole: :90 pounds Height of Pole: 11.7 feet Height to Load on Pole: 6.5 . Moment per Pole: 5785 • . - . oimds Material: HSS Column Sx: 3.9 inches^3 Size: HSS 4x4xI/4 lx: 7.8 incbes'•4 , fb: 17800 psi - ok - < ; - .0 psi E: 29000000 psi • 1 Deflection: 0.62 inches = L! 453.095 ' • e Design (Wind Load on Pole) . o Wind Load per Pole: -. Plf . eight of Pole: I feet Momen Pole 1 foot-pounds HSS Column Sx: 3.9 inches^3 • . Size: . HSS 4x4x1/4 1x: 7.8 inches^4 fb: 2 psi- ok- < 30360 psi E: 29000000 psi Deflection: 0.1'0. inches = L/ 1.2E+08 Noneonstrained Foundation Design (ref IBC 1805.7.2.1) . Point Load P: 890 pounds , • it • 6.5 feet Allowable Lateral Soil Pressure: 200 pcf (Table 1804.2 - no increase taken) Assumed depth of embedment 6 feet SI: 400 psf diameter or diagonal of footing, b: 2.5 feet A: 2.08260 required depth of embedment, d: 5.021 feet Uniform Load P: pounds h: 0.500 feet Allowable Lateral So' ' -.. . 100 pcf (Table 18042 - no increase taken) Assumed depth of emb -.n.• t 1.000 feet Si: 33 psf diameter or dia • . - :t of footing. b: 2.5 feet A: : t :08 -• depth of embedment, d: 0_ ' feet Required Depth of Embedment 5:021 ft • • VISSER ENGINEERING Project Tigard Starhucls(10 037) • Client the design COLLECTIVE Calculation Sheet Date: 6/30/2010 Page: )j Tide: Typ. Pole Foundation for 6'-6" x T -3" Screen Wall .. __ _ . —__ . ... _ - .. _.. _ _ _ .. • Pole and Pole Foundation Pole Design (Total Lateral Load) Total Shear. 550 pounds Number of Poles in Structure: 1 each Shear per Pole: 550 pounds Height of Po1C 7.25 feet , Height to Load on Pole: 4 Moment per Pole: 2200 foot - pounds Material: HSS Column Sx: 3.9 inches^3 Size: HSS 4x4x1/4 lx: 7.8 inches^4 fb: 6769 psi - ok - < 30360 psi E: 29000000 psi Deflection: 0.09 inches = U 1941.23 b)e,Design (Wind Load on Pole) Unifo ... ' and Load per Pole: plf ght of Pole: 1 feet Moment Pole 1 foot - pounds HSS Column Sx: 3.9 inches^3 Size: HSS 4x4x1/4 1x: 7.8 inches^4 fb: 2 psi - ok - < 30360 psi E: 29000000 psi Deflection: 0. u " " inches = Li 1.2E+08 Nonconstrained Foundation Design (ref IBC 1805.7.2.1) Point Load P: 550 pounds h 4 feet Allowable Lateral Soil Pressure: 200 pcf (fable 1804.2 - no increase taken) Assumed depth of embedment 4.5 feet Sl: 300 psf diameter or diagonal of footing, b: 2 feet A: 2.14500 ' required depth of embedment, d 4313 feet `Uniform Load P: 1 pounds h 0300 feet Allowable Lateral So ' -. sum 100 pcf (Table 1804.2 - no increase taken) Assumed depth of em ... . t 1.000 feet Sl: 33 psf diameter or dia •ri of footing, b: 23 feet A ►. • :08 >• 1 depth of embedment, d: 0.13 • feet Required Depth of Embedment 4.313 ft • • • its. 5 4: 1 1 - tJct 4 4 5empe . • • GAPRW - TYP. • - - TOP AND BOTTOM a 4(6 II - H55 4x4x!44 POST 1x4 IFE BOARD ®5' -0'oc (MAXJ NU (2) HIL #12 -24 (ASTM A500 6R B) 505T M - NU 45 POINT TO . • POST ` Y PROVIDE 6'x6' x 10' RECESS IN CENTER OF FOOTING - TYP. FINISH GRADE ■ • it __m_m - 111=" w =_m_ E ni ui " • u iu CONCRETE FOOTING in 200 PSI MINA m 30'0 • 5K- I � � -q" T o l l Screen V10 11 Support ` � S �R1lCTU'• q TITLE: : II' -1" SCREEN WALL SUPPORT MU NONE VI SSER J PR i FFc� gf EN GINEERING �` � �G� I, F % PlloiCT: TIGARD MARKETPLACE STARBUCKS 1 ,411 3 13560 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY, TIGARD, OR 11223 • 32121 WEYERHAEUSER WAY 5. • • ,. c . CENT: the design COLLECTIVE SUITE FEDERAL 103 WAY, M. '18001 4 1 , 1 • � SS 2303 WEST COMMODORE WAY, SEATTLE, WA 18111 VOICE: (253) 835 -0810 E '' 11: ADD CAR ADD NU NA: 10 - 031 FAX: (253) 835 -0813 EXPIRATION DATE: 6 -30 -2012 DATE: 06/30/10 : I of 2 • • GAP - TYP. TOP AND BOTTOM • •p • 1x4 IPE FENCE BOARD V4/ (2) HILTI *12 -24 SDST %REVS VV/ *5 POINT TO EACH POST - < 1455 4x4x! POST VP. EACH SIDE ® 5' -0°oc (MAX) OF POST (ASTM A500 6R B) 3 1 1 FINISH GRADE - _ = __ - _II ` - II III III II II - II - z d- I < CONCRETE FOOTING (2500 PSI MIN) L -J II1�11 11 II II Ilt�lll it II alI II 24'0 / / 5K-2 T-3 T• I I Screen Wall Suort S\ R UCTU 'q < : 1' -3" SCREEN WALL SUPPORT SCALE NONE vISSEI� � R io PR� .. , ss PROJECT: TIGARD MARKETPLACE STARBUCKS ENGINEERING ,Gj •, �G�� £ \ ? 7 fl 13560 5W PACIFIC HIGHWAY, TIGARD, OR c11223 3212EYERHAEUSER WAY 5. •3 R . o ', WENT: the design COLLECTIVE 9 W SUITE 103 �� ° , 9 99�` 2303 WEST COMMODORE MY, SEATTLE, WA 9819q FEDERAL WAY, WA. 9 8001 v \S VOICE: (253) 835 -0810 MGf : ADD CAR ADD PROD. M. 10 -031 FAX: (253) 835 -0813 EXPIRAT]ON DATE: 6 -30 -2012 »ATE: 06/30/10 SHEET 2 of 2 Form 2a Project Name: Starbucks Tigard Marketplace CE1 P age: SUMMARY N 16 2.010 Project 1. Project Name Starbucks Tigard Marketplaces D1 rT1 D 0 V I ARD 2. Project Address 13560 SW Pacific Hwy sUIL 3. City/Town Tigard 5 County { Washington 4. Building, Gross Area (ft2) 2,174 6. No. of Floors 1 7. Construction Site Elevation Above 2,000 ft? ❑ YES El NO Attached Chapter Type ID Description Attach Forms and Building Envelope Form 3a Building Envelope - General ❑ Worksheets 3b Prescriptive Path - All Climate Zones ❑ * CodeComp Report for Simplified Trade -off ❑ Check boxes to * In lieu of 3b * Floppy disc with .occ CodeComp file ❑ indicate attached Worksheet 3a Wall U- factor ❑ forms and 3b Roof U- factor ❑ worksheets 3c Floor U- factor ❑ 3d Window /Skylight Schedule ❑ Systems Form 4a Systems - General ❑ 4b Complex Systems ❑ Worksheet 4a Unitary Air Conditioners - Air Cooled ❑ 4b Unitary Air Cond. - Water & Evap Cooled ❑ 4c Unitary Heat Pump - Air Cooled ❑ 4d Unitary Heat Pump - Water Cooled ❑ 4e Packaged Terminal A.C. - Air Cooled ❑ 4f Packaged Terminal Heat Pump - Air Cooled ❑ 4g Water Chilling Pkgs - Water & Air Cooled ❑ 4h Heat Rejection Equipment ❑ 4i Boiler - Gas -Fired and Oil -Fired ❑ 4j Furnace & Unit Heaters - Gas and Oil-Fired ❑ 4k Simultaneous Heating and Cooling ❑ 41 Air Transport Energy ❑ 4m Natural Ventilation ❑ Lighting Form 5a Lighting - General ❑ 5b Interior Lighting Power - Tenant Method ❑ 5c Int. Ltng. Power - Space -by -Space Method ❑ Worksheet 5a Lighting Schedule ❑ 5b Interior Lighting Power ❑ Applicant 7. Name Chris Rensch, PE 10. Telephone 360 - 863 -6677 8. Company Rensch Engineering 11. Date 06/08/10 9. Signature Chris Rensch, PE Attached No. of Pages Description of Documentation Document- 1 Comparison of existing to new lighting wattage calculation ation �,uniNlian�e wlln 035C, Crrei,dve 6 /01103 r i c ii. • Project: Starbucks 3366 Tigard Date: 6/8/2010 By: Chris Rensch, PE Calculations below indicate that the new fixtures wattage is less than or equal to the existing lights being removed. Existing Li hts Summary: Location Description Qty Qty 1 Watts Total Watts Remaining Being Demo'd Workroom 2x4 Fluorescent Troffer 4 x 96 = 0 Restroom Wall Sconce 2 x 17 = 0 & Vest. Recd Incand. Downlight 3 x 60 = 0 x = 0 Bar Rec'd Incand. Downlight 10 4 x 60 = 240 Task Lights 3 x 50 = 0 Seating Rec'd CFL Downlights 4 1 x 17 = 17 6" Rec'd Incand. Downlight 7 x 75 = 525 4" Recd Incand. Downlight 4 x 50 = 200 Window pendants 4 x 60 = 240 Inc. Gooseneck 4 x 75 = 300 Track Heads 4 foot track section 2 x = 0 8 foot track section 3 x = 0 Totals = 31 24 Exist. Total = 1522 % of lights being changed = 44% New Lights being added: _ Tag Description Qty Watts Total Watts L304 5" Recd Incand. Downlight (1 -75w PAR30) 2 x 75 = 150 L577 48" Task Light (2 -T8 32w lamps) 1 x 64 = 64 ADL32 Decorative CFL pendant (1 -18w GU24 CFL Tamp) 6 x 20 = 120 ADL33 Decorative CFL pendant (1 -18w GU24 CFL lamp) 13 x 20 = 260 x = 0 x = 0 x = 0 New Total = 594 Conclusion:There is a net reduction in lighting load for this renovation. Page 1 RECEIVED Form 2a Project Name: Starbucks Tigard Marketplace JUN 16 2010 Page: SUMMARY CITY OF TIGARD Project 1. Project Name Starbucks Tigard Marketplace #3366 2. Project Address 13560 SW Pacific Hwy 3. City/Town Tigard 5. County Washington .�j 4. Building, Gross Area (ft2) 2,174 6. No. of Floors I 1 7. Construction Site Elevation Above 2,000 ft? ❑ YES El NO Attached Chapter Type ID Description Attach Forms and Building Envelope Form 3a Building Envelope - General ❑ Worksheets 3b Prescriptive Path - All Climate Zones ❑ * CodeComp Report for Simplified Trade -off ❑ Check boxes to * In lieu of 3b * Floppy disc with .occ CodeComp file ❑ indicate attached Worksheet 3a Wall U- factor ❑ forms and 3b Roof U- factor ❑ worksheets 3c Floor U- factor ❑ 3d Window /Skylight Schedule ❑ Systems Form 4a Systems - General ❑ 4b Complex Systems ❑ Worksheet 4a Unitary Air Conditioners - Air Cooled ❑ 4b Unitary Air Cond. - Water & Evap Cooled ❑ 4c Unitary Heat Pump - Air Cooled ❑ 4d Unitary Heat Pump - Water Cooled ❑ 4e Packaged Terminal A.C. - Air Cooled ❑ 4f Packaged Terminal Heat Pump - Air Cooled ❑ 4g Water Chilling Pkgs - Water & Air Cooled ❑ 4h Heat Rejection Equipment ❑ 4i Boiler - Gas -Fired and Oil -Fired ❑ 4j Furnace & Unit Heaters - Gas and Oil-Fired ❑ 4k Simultaneous Heating and Cooling ❑ 41 Air Transport Energy ❑ 4m Natural Ventilation ❑ Lighting Form 5a Lighting - General ❑ 5b Interior Lighting Power - Tenant Method ❑ 5c Int. Ltng. Power - Space -by -Space Method ❑ Worksheet 5a Lighting Schedule ❑ 5b Interior Lighting Power ❑ Applicant 7. Name Chris Rensch, PE 10. Telephone 360- 863 -6677 8. Company Rensch Engineering 11. Date 06/08/10 9. Signature Chris Rensch, PE Attached No. of Pages Description of Documentation Document- 1 Comparison of existing to new lighting wattage calculation ation CLIiI WIUI 5550, crl+ruilve u i/0 i/03 I Project: Starbucks 3366 Tigard Date: 6/8/2010 By: Chris Rensch, PE Calculations below indicate that the new fixtures wattage is Tess than or equal to the existing lights being removed. Existing Li hts Summary: Location Description Qty Qty 1 Watts Total Watts Remaining Being Demo'd Workroom 2x4 Fluorescent Troffer 4 x 96 = 0 Restroom Wall Sconce 2 x 17 = 0 & Vest. Rec'd Incand. Downlight 3 x 60 = 0 x = 0 Bar Rec'd Incand. Downlight 10 4 x 60 =, 240 Task Lights 3 x 50 = 0 Seating Recd CFL Downlights 4 1 x 17 = 17 6" Recd Incand. Downlight 7 x 75 = 525 4" Rec'd Incand. Downlight 4 x 50 = 200 Window pendants 4 x 60 = 240 Inc. Gooseneck 4 x 75 = 300 Track Heads 4 foot track section 2 x = 0 8 foot track section 3 x = 0 Totals = 31 24 i Exist. Total = I 1522 of lights being changed = 44% New Lights being added: Tag Description Qty Watts Total Watts L304 5" Recd Incand. Downlight (1 -75w PAR30) 2 x 75 = 150 L577 48" Task Light (2 -T8 32w lamps) 1 x 64 = 64 ADL32 Decorative CFL pendant (1 -18w GU24 CFL lamp) 6 x 20 = 120 ADL33 Decorative CFL pendant (1 -18w GU24 CFL Tamp) 13 x 20 = 260 x = 0 x = 0 x = 0 New Total = 594 Conclusion:There is a net reduction in lighting load for this renovation. Page 1