The URL can be used to link to this page

Report Northwest GEO Consultants, LLC December 18, 2012 DR Horton, Inc. l q z 77 S" 4L Pr L C d G S -T ee.,7 4380 SW Macadam Avenue, Suite 100 _ Portland, Oregon 97239 5 pr Attention: Kristian Ingebrigtsen RE: Final Construction Observation Report Alpine View Subdivision Northwest GEO Consultants provided geotechnical special inspections of home foundations and segmental block retaining walls constructed at Alpine View in Tigard, Oregon. The observations were conducted on an on -call, intermittent basis to confirm that construction was completed in general conformance with the recommendations provide in our project geotechnical evaluation and Segmental Retaining Wall (SRW) design. Our involvement began on May 14, 2012 and ended on November 27, 2012. We completed 13 site visits, observing foundation subgrade preparations for 11 homes and SRW construction of 2 permitted walls on lots 3/22 and 6/29. Based on our observations, as documented in the attached Field Observation Reports, it is our opinion that the construction was completed in general conformance with the engineering design and project specifications and will perform as intended. ♦ ♦ • We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service to you. Please call if you have questions concerning this report or if we can pro ide additional services. Sincerely, J .I.IP•ArP t••41PE i - 110 • Brad L. upy, P �r Principal Engineer ." Attachments: Field Visit Log ; .i1,Mr'E 93, 2 Field Observation Reports 1 to 13 Northwest CEO Consultants, LLC - 1411 SE 30th Avenue, Suite 6, Portland, Oregon 97214 • (5031702.8437 - www.ngc-lk.com 1411 SE 30th Avenue Suite 6 Portland Oregon 97214 Northwest GEO Tel (503) 702 8437 FIELD VISIT LOG Consultants, LLC www.ngc- Ilc.com OWNER /CLIENT PROJECT NAME PERMIT D R Horton Alpine View GENERAL CONTRACTOR PHASE NAME EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR DHI PACIFIC GROUNDWORKS VISIT NO. DATE PURPOSE OF VISIT / COMENTS REVISIT REQUIRED (Y /N) 1 5/14/2012 Subgrade Lots 8/32 & 9/35 2 5/16/2012 Subgrade Lot 1/19 3 5/17/2012 Subgrade Lot 1/19 Recheck 4 6/19/2012 Subgrade Lot 10/36 5 6/20/201 2 Subgrade Lots 4/23 & 6/29 6 7/30/2012 Subgrade Lot 2/21 • • 7 8/1 7/2012 Subgrade Lots 2/21 & 3/22 • 8 9/4/2012 Subgrade Lots 7/30 & 11/37 9 9/12/2012 Subgrad Lot 5/28 10 11/5/2012 SRW Subgrade of 3/22 11 11/5/2012 SRW Backfill Lot 3/22 12 11/26/2012 SRW Subgrade Lot 6/29 13 11/27/2012 SRW Backfill Density Lot 6/29 14 • 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NGC's professionals are represented on site solely to observe operations of the contractor identified, to form opinions about the adequacy of those operations, and to report those opinions to our client. The presence and activities of our field representative do not relieve any contractor from its obligation to meet contractual requirements. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project. irrespective of the presence of our representative. The contractor retains sole responsibility for site safety and the methods, operations, and sequences of construction. 6915 SW Nyberg - P104 Tel( tin, Oregon 97062 FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT Northwest GEO nwgeoconsultants @frontier.com Consultants, LLC PROIECT ID DATE REPORT NO. Alpine View May 14, 2012 1 OWNER /CLIENT OWNER /CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE DAY OF WEEK PAGE D R Horton (DHI) Reed Couch Monday 1 of 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME DEPARTURE TIME DHI Perry Wagoner 0830 0900 GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER/TEMPERATURE PERMIT Pacific Earthworks Overcast, 60°F TYPE OF WORK SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF FILL MATERIAL NGC REPRESENTATIVE Footing Subgrade NA Brad Hupy, PE, GE LOCATION OF WORK CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED IN USE Lots 32 & 35 Mid Size Trackhoe • CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY, OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: I made this site visit-as requested by Perry Wagoner to observe the conditions of subgrade for single family homes that will be constructed on Lots 32 and 35. I spoke with Mr. Wagoner over the phone. At the time of my visit, the footings had been excavated to subgrade. On lot 35, subgrade was covered with a thin layer of uncompacted crushed rock. I observed and probed the subgrade using a 1/2-inch diameter steel foundation probe. The subgrade in both lots consisted of very stiff to hard silt with trace fine sand. Based on observation and probing, the subgrade excavations have been prepared in general conformance with the project specifications and my recommendations and will perform as intended to support single family home foundations. The areas are ready for placement of footing forms and reinforcement. Lot NUMBERS CHANGED Lot 32 changed to Lot 8 Attachments: Photo Log Lot 35 changed to Lot 9 A Preliminary report Is provided solely as evidence that the field observation was performed. Observations, and /or conclusions. and /or FINAL PRELIMINARY recommendations conveyed In the final report may =ry from and shall take precedence over those Indicated in a preliminary report. A final report is an instrument of professional service. y conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional Involved. ITEMS TO OBSERVE, CHECK, OR TEST DURING NEXT VISIT FIELD REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE DATE NGCs professionals are represented on site solely to observe op rations • he contractor identified, to form opinions about the adequacy of those operations, and to report those opinions to out client. The presence and activities of our field r tative do not relieve any contractor from its obligation to meet contractual requirements. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project, irrespective of the presence of our representative. The contractor retains sole responsibility for site safety and the methods, operations, and sequences of construction. • 6915 SW Nyberg - P104 Tualatin, Oregon 97062 FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT Northwest GEO Tel (503) 702 8437 Consultants, LLC nwgeoconsultants@frontier.com PROJECT ID DATE REPORT NO. Alpine View May 16, 2012 2 OWNER/CLIENT OWNER/CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE DAY OF WEEK PAGE D R Horton (DHI) Reed Couch Wednesday 1 of 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME DEPARTURE TIME DHI Perry Wagoner 1600 1700 GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER/TEMPERATURE PERMIT Pacific Groundworks Ray Elwess Sunny, 75 °F TYPE OF WORK SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF FILL MATERIAL NGC REPRESENTATIVE Footing Subgrade NA Brad Hupy, PE, GE LOCATION OF WORK CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED IN USE Lot 1 / 19 Mid Size Trackhoe CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY. OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: 1 made this site visit as requested by Perry Wagoner to observe the conditions of subgrade for a single family home that will be constructed on Lot 1. I spoke with Mr. Wagoner over the phone. At the time of my visit, about 3/4 of the site had been excavated to subgrade. The contractor had departed for the day and will return tomorrow when the dump site for disposing of excess soil is open. I observed and probed the subgrade that was completed using a 1 /2 -inch diameter steel foundation probe. The native subgrade in most of the lot consisted of very stiff to hard silt with trace fine sand. In the eastern portion of the lot the soil was soft and appeared to have been disturbed by removal of a large stump. I spoke with Mr. Wagoner about the need to overexcavate to remove the soft soil in this area. 1 will return to the site tomorrow to check the remaining areas and the area where the soft soil is located. Attachments: Photo Log A Preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that the field observation was performed. Observations. and /or conclusions. and /or FINAL (• �� PRELIMINARY recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those Indicated m a preliminary report. A final report is an Instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. _-- ITEMS TO OBSERV� OR T DU' . EX! VISIT Check restlaf lot a d -tom. \.. FIELD REPRESENTATIVE SI '"I DATE 17 5 Ze / z-- NGC's professionals are represented on site solely to observe operations of the contractor identified. to form opinions about the adequacy of those operations. and to report those opinions to our client The presence and activities of our field representative do not relieve any contractor from its obligation to meet contractual requirements We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project, irrespective of the presence of our representative The contractor retains sole responsibility for site safety and the methods, operations, and sequences of construction, Tualatin, Oregon Northwest GEO PHOTO LOG Tel (503) 702 8437 nwgeoconsultants@frontier com Consultants, LLC OWNER/CLIENT PROJECT DATE DAY OF WEEK D R HORTON ALPINE VIEW MAY 16, 2012 WEDNESDAY , # L CI fiqi ,, , c ,,,, 7' M �1Af Lot 19 :'' K i v a 1 ' , . . ■• ; :.... q 442 '4 '4' ' . . '',.:,* ' 'A %;'...% 4. ' '''''‘, '' ' ''''' ;';` ,, -A.t . ?? ' A. ' 1 !"y, '�' J.�y .b A +rya 1'� .., gJ� i .. Y . y`j'yy ...,.. x l „JA e , • y r , . ,,ALA ".tt', t;l � y� $ ...!it A”. wi '` Y t '' 13 , ,,<++ i i : 4" A '.." `4.. i; .,"" . • )?r R ` �' ? . ....„ , ,. . ,a •-c i''^, s.:,.lafs°E.. %'7.- .,_...,.,:ar Sa a r �a' xµ 1 'i * "i ; lf',dm P,s�i *: e>« YY a l',.,11 .x� ' ?tit 1 [ ■ "**° s - - i ••+ a- _.. .. Cpl,° q , +„ 0 !II ,�. a < ms's 'R- A v»' "F '+ s , ^;it J -. i a -n r _ *ems 'S; .„ �' 4,- 4 ) ' - ' r., v ''� . ""=- �' 'sue #s,,, _. ,, ' . 1', ' .. ,p "' ". 7; '.t.')411, Y e 1r Lot 1 9 � .., "4e `�` rr 4 1 + „. ••' -... 7 . • r • ) __ •4s, v' . Tt c s) ,' is ' .P• r s �' " �' " ti e0 :,', t r * a+ -' ,, 4 ° , l Y a.,'tc i" d!!rt '�.�. "a ,_ vo � i , 41. �� to .0 ,,a. �` -'v :; -- -- . , n c '. ,� 6915 SW Nyberg • P104 E!Euer.corn FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT • • PROJECT ID DATE REPORT NO. Alpine View May 17, 2012 3 OWNER /CLIENT OWNER /CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE OAY OF WEEK PACE D R Horton (DHI) Reed Couch Thursday 1 of 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME DEPARTURE TIME • DHI Perry Wagoner 1200 1230 GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER/TEMPERATURE PERMIT Ray Elwess Sunny, 75°F TYPE OF WORK SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF FILL MATERIAL NGC REPRESENTATIVE Footing Subgrade NA Brad Hupy, PE, GE LOCATION OF WORK CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED IN USE Lot 1 / Mid Size Trackhoe CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY. OBSERVATIONS. CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: 1 made this site visit as requested by Perry Wagoner to observe the conditions of subgrade for a single family home that will be constructed on Lot 19. I spoke with Mr. Wagoner over the phone. At the time of my visit, the contractor had removed the large tree stump and excavated the soft soil that was located on the front east portion of the lot. The excavation was approximately 2 -feet below subgrade elevation where the stump had been. The contractor expected about two loads of Tigard Sand & Gravel %" -minus crushed rock will be used as fill. Tigard Sand & Gravel is to saturate the crushed rock at the pit before delivery. The rock should be compacted until well keyed using a hoe -pac on the excavator. Based on observation and probing, the subgrade exposed subgrade is firm medium stiff to hard native silt. After the crushed rock is placed and compacted the area will be prepared in general conformance with the project specifications and my recommendations and will perform as intended to support single family home foundations. Attachments: Photo Log. A Preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that the field observation was performed Observations, and /or conclusions, and /or ® FINAL PRELIMINARY recommendations conveyed In the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated on a prebminary report. A final report Is an instrument of professional service_ Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional Involved. ITEMS TO OBSERVE, CHECK, CR TEST DURING NEXT VISIT None tr7 IEIDREPRESENTATIVE51 t E �_ DATE (p Zel Z" NGC's professionals are represented on site so -ly to • •serve o• rations of the contractor identified, to form optnto -is about the adequacy of those operations. and to report those opinions to our client. The presence and actM es • our field -presentative do not relieve any contractor from Its obligation to meet contractual requirements We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications through. t the d tion of the project, irrespective of the presence of our representative The contractor retains sole responsibilrty for site safety and the methods. operations, and sequences o • ruction_ Tualatin, Oregon Northwest GEO Tel (503) 702 8437 PHOTO LOG nwgeoconsultants @frontier.com Consultants, LLC OWNERICLIENT PROJECT DATE DAY OF WEEK D R HORTON ALPINE VIEW MAY 1 7, 2012 THURSDAY • ( ., :: k '‘'-' ', j, ' , ',. �� ( ' r f t A k es‘ "tea;, .. art' ' - " : � .a., „r, - ' . ± .r .h . -`I'; . 'ht. v r. .. !,x. .. - �` "46- :,. o ''' -g. TAO LOT 19 . i AREA OF STUMP THAT ml _ .._ '� ; „.> _ . '}' " -.A.:. . WAS REMOVED •- -- -- =, ' � � a � 6915 SW Nyberg . P104 Tel ( inn O r e 8437 7062 FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT Northwest GEO www.ngc- Ilc.com Consultants, LLC PROJECT ID DATE REPORT NO, Alpine View June 19, 2012 4 OWNER /CLIENT OWNER/CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE DAY OF WEEK PAGE D R Horton (DHI) Reed Couch Tuesday 1 of 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME DEPARTURE TIME DHI Craig Martin 1025 1045 GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER/TEMPERATURE PERMIT Pacific Groundworks Ray Elwess Overcast, Lt rain,55°F TYPE OF WORK SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF FILL MATERIAL NGC REPRESENTATIVE Footing Subgrade NA Brad Hupy, PE, GE LOCATION OF WORN CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED IN USE Lot 36 /10 Mid Size Trackhoe CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY, OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: I made this site visit as requested by Craig Martin to observe the condition of subgrade for a single family home that will be constructed on Lot 36. I spoke with Mr. Martin over the phone. At the time of my visit, the footings had been excavated to subgrade. I observed and probed the subgrade using a 1 /2 -inch diameter steel foundation probe. The subgrade in the lot consisted of very stiff to hard native silt, Based on observation and probing, the subgrade excavations have been prepared in general conformance with the project specifications and my recommendations and will perform as intended to support single family home foundations. The areas are ready for placement of footing forms and reinforcement. Attachments: Photo Log A Preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that the held obvervauon was performed Observations, andlor conclusions, and /or ' il weal ❑ PRELAMINARY recommendations conveyed on the final moon may vary From and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report A final report is an instrument of professional service Any conclusions drawn from this moon should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved ITEMS TO OBSERVE„ CHECK, OR TEST DURING NEXT FIELD REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE c DATE NCC's professionals are represented an site solely to observe operations of the contractor Identified, to Corm opinions about the adequacy of those operations, and to report those opinions to our client The presence and activities of our field representative do not relieve any contractor from is obligation to meet contractual requirements We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and spec l cations throughout the duration of the project, In'especuve of the presence of ow representative the contractor retains sole responsibility for site safety and the methods, operations, and sequences of construction, Tualatin, Oregon Northwest GEO Tel (503) 702 8437 PHOTO LOG www.ngc- Ilc.com Consultants, L LC OWNER/CLIENT PROJECT DATE DAY OF WEEK D R HORTON ALPINE VIEW JUNE 19, 2012 TUESDAY } j. E] a} 4 ) ' i rl r • 5...1++1 r 1 4--4,•-•:7.:-..' 44 ! 1< ` # r¢ , 1� z.,?a , 14.4' g ! "c., 1 _ J ;a✓aw %�- z ma c. w ^i 9*L7 a.. fi '�°�aP►��` -a' �xi +ter•. -- - ..,rx,-. a,. - T gib? s '� ' Lot 36 ` t " X. ^ of / �._ r __ `- 1 I - ,.. l " r pT0..l C. ''l HONC fk 10M1.11. _ p s f - 35 - - ' . - _ i 1 . y `i, 6915 SW Nyberg • P104 Tualatin, Oregon 97062 FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT Northwest GEO Tel (503) 702 8437 Consultants LLC nwgeoconsultantstiefrontier,com PROJECT ID DATE REPORT NO. Alpine View June 20, 2012 5 OWNER /CLIENT OWNER/CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE DAY OF WEEK PAGE D R Horton (DHI) Reed Couch Wednesday 1 of 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME DEPARTURE TIME DHI Craig Martin 1330 1400 GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER/TEMPERATURE PERMIT Pacific Groundworks Ray Elwess Clear. 75°F TYPE OF WORK SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF FILL MATERIAL NGC REPRESENTATIVE Footing Subgrade NA Brad Hupy, PE, GE LOCATION OF WORK CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED IN USE Lots 23 & 29 (4 & 6) Mid Size Trackhoe CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY, OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: I made this site visit as requested by Craig Martin to observe the conditions of subgrade for single family homes that will be constructed on Lots 23 and 29. I spoke with Mr. Martin over the phone. At the time of my visit, the contractor had been excavated to subgrade elevation. I observed and probed the subgrade using a 1/2-inch diameter steel foundation probe. The subgrade in the lots consisted of medium stiff to hard native silt. !observed an area of loose soil approximately 7 feet in length located underneath the footing line In the southeast corner of lot 29. The soft area appeared to be from a tree stump hole that was loosely backfilled. I recommended and observed the contractor excavate the soft soil to a depth of 1- foot and recompact with crushed rock. Based on observation and probing, the subgrade excavations have been prepared in general conformance with the project specifications and my recommendations and will perform as intended to support single family home foundations. The areas are ready for placement of footing forms and reinforcement. Attachments: Photo Log A Preliminary report is provided solely as evidence dial a held observation was performed Observations, and /or conclusions, and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may v. front and shall take precedence over those ind caled in a preliminary report A ring? ® FINAL PRELIMINARY report is an Instrument of professional service • • conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the Professional involved, ITEMS TO OBSERVE, CHECK, OR TEST DURING NEXT FIELD REPRESENTATIVE SIGNAiIJRE DATE NGC's professionals are represented or, site solely to o erve upe,,muris " he contractor identified, lo fury opinion about Ile adequacy of IMMose operations. and to import those opinions to our client The presence and activities of • • field rept • tame do not relieve any contractor from Its obligation to meet contractual requrrements We rely on the contractor to comply wish the plans and specifications throughout the oration of the project, Irrespective of the presence of nun representative The contractor retains tole responsibility for sne salty and the methods operations, and sequences of construction Tualatin, Oregon Northwest GEO Tel (503) 702 8437 PHOTO LOG nwgeoconsultants @frontier, Consultants, LLC OWNER/CLIENT PROJECT DATE DAY OF WEEK D R NORTON ALPINE VIEW JUNE 20, 201 2 WEDNESDAY '` '` F I ,.„,./:', fp) , •- - .x CMi .__ s f ,s J --- k"' � s \, tx .,.1,,tme R at kfl `s ,.I _, � ;- 't.s ,�; 'i- & ; '' 1.. Lot 23 ..,- ,a, •1,_ w , r1. .1.. :........ "'C . °'-`t O . € '' I4 J. fir. ''' •: '' T . , '' is s # � 1 . _ .r F ti,r +- S ts- a•- ,� , , • , d �., ' t.s.. 'B d„ y. k" 4"': . 4::f- ::.. - l�w.�. "• " �.. ' i,, q.C`.y_ .. ` rY ,J g .yy+X .,.��" . �✓'n'. � �Y„. .,:.. r ✓' : �... "-- , o � , ,04" 4,: '$; �,w .` R '* �-' r �' e + rte - 4-1 , 4 , 44 , ,:y.-....., , »; � , "". � "� -° 4F ... � } ,, ` ..r L' z "x " . " 1 , •r .r x > {'f: M x R;� y - - ° �^} 4 aS ``yl.i :'C�pir' G;,.= %� l k x' � �� x � Y � } � �• ��. Y. , � `� � i �Y � '�� r' %',. �.K � � ;.,a 7 . T; �,,. rr� �, .. 3 ,�p�,,,p�w ,�$ � � `;�s ° •� r..f ,;:�;,' .' ,K etJ:- r'•:..,.,�r '''.f*P' 'r.:. 93, s + ° :; Y.:. s1: J`s'�"!S�r. ":sJ.@'".u•�..,R� �•:rr ,' ? „w ti?. - F t f ` 1 N ' 4' I " : � v, ..� j'^i s — - t*,� 4 - nt �cc— l.`,.x 'Su r.. s -•- 1 ! -. -- . '" . •w r';_ r e' Y , 3 ,,°,s e wm F <A °` 6 4e,,,-,-. � 1 , ... .f' -^ • ' P ' . .. id!, � , aY 4,5 , % ' e M -.. -- - 2 7 ` ' - ` E Lot 29 a f ' [A;L -r,cy ^�# 4 S d .fa Yew A 9f' a / r _`.".' - °r r_ 0 �.,...,'i, a it .i t ., y� , a . a r ' * "°a r �w • � - y am. r p+ ' . • A ..'- ^ '- ^' 2x �i ,.e,eo__ - - ' ..�k'•r fir` �. ,., •'..v - � � , s :,; L•. •: °' .. -.. - �<. .c„�. 6915 SW Nyberg - P104 Tualatin. Oregon 97062 FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT Northwest GEO Tel (503) 702 8437 www.ngc•Ilc.com Consultants, LLC PROTECT ID DATE REPORT NO. Alpine View July 30, 2012 6 OWNER /CLIENT OWNER/CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE DAV OF WEEK PAGE D R Horton (DHI) Reed Couch Monday 1 of 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME DEPARTURE TIME DHI Jason Russell 1645 1710 GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER/TEMPERATURE PERMIT Pacific Groundworks Ray Elwess Overcast, 75 °F TYPE OF WORK SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF FILL MATERIAL MCC REPRESENTATIVE Footing Subgrade NA Brad Hupy, PE, GE LOCATION OF WORK CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED IN USE ttsrt9 2 Mid Size Trackhoe CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY. OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS 1 made this site visit as requested by Jason Russell to observe the conditions of subgrade for a single family home that will be constructed on Lot ?92 spoke with Mr. Russell over the phone, At the time of my visit, the contractor had been excavated to subgrade elevation. I observed and probed the subgrade using a 1 /2 -inch diameter steel foundation probe. The subgrade in the front of the lot consists of very stiff to hard native silt. In the back of the lot, subgrade consists of very stiff to hard residual soil. Based on observation and probing, the subgrade excavations have been prepared in general conformance with the project specifications and my recommendations and will perform as intended to support single family home foundations. The areas are ready for placement of footing forms and reinforcement. Attachments: Photo Log IC I A Preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that the field observation was performed Observations. any /or conclusions. and /or FINAL PRELIMINARY recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall - - • - cedence over those indicated in a preliminary report A final report n an instrumtnt of professional service Any conclusions • - -n from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved ITEMS TO OBSERVE, CHECK. OR TEST OURINGNEXT VISIT FIELD REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE , DATE NCC's professionals are represented on site solely to •bse 'e operations of the contr or Identified, to form opinions about the adequacy of those operations, and to report those opinions to our client The presence and activities .1 our field representative do •t relieve any contractor from its obligation to meet contractual requirements We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the • anon of thh,project, irrespective or the presence of our representative The contractor retains sole responsibility for site safety and the methods, operations. and sequences of contuucti• Tualatin, Oregon Northwest GEO LLC PHOTO LO Tel (503) 702 8437 Consultants wwwngc- Ilc.com , OWNER/CLIENT PROJECT DATE DAY OF WEEK D R HORTON ALPINE VIEW JULY 30, 2012 MONDAY 7 ■ + 0 IITI l' ) :- , 7 II NM # ',0 '4. , loth ''I , .,. Niiiirr ' A � - FlRUREIEASE f" .-..T"'� V"' � 1311NIIIITII�' _+w � - Lull � — z �« , - HOMFSITE ` , Ale i, -•• * 1 : '�"`f F ' t '. 2� Y f 9 \ /torn., ,;,, F.. - ,. mo t ' . { i � � „ '' °°" .' + x � / ,� .,-- ` fit , I �� ( 'f :1 �. "' ,r ,: V. - ' vE .r*,S' s- ' 410 410,,,,,5.+.4.. ,r'' ' y* a �• t S„ . ac ?..'"i'' ✓'v,.X.: - ,.,} 7'F , { ;.‘ . F 'v T � � � � - ' ..C� Oy u• r ��• • `,, :'; = ,ti ,' - e N''''.....:• -tom` .&`.. �', .: ! ' Y .. al S F .'A,e j � --• ' -, ' „ 3 � ' ; ,4741 ,,,:+':;- + t. 11r ,mo • r 1 yi r.' " c � + z I -'r �°'3 l ` , -r, ¢'A ye. it x t eF 5 t '4''''': i -6y - -. $, -4. F 1 ; ! '^ ` ,;-1�g�' "�• )" .+ 44 JS `* r si sap il j4y z, , x k - + °� } y t t� t�v t e • if ' I � Ti xry Trig I 1 1 i11 i " 11 ' I' Till/ I A .r l ----^- i N. 6915 SW Nyberg - P104 Tualatin, Oregon 97062 FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT Northwest CEO Tel (503) 702 8437 Consultants, LLC nwgeoconsultants@frontier.com een,u rn DATE pcpnpr a,n Alpine View August 17. 2012 7 n∎en ee rf1 lean- nu,ucp rn ,M pcocccnrrarnre rime INC WRY pare D R Horton (DHI) Reed Couch Friday 1 of 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME DEPARTURE TIME DHI Don Durst 0945 1015 GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER/TEMPERATURE PERMIT Ray Elwess Sunny, 80T TYPE OF WORK SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF FILL MATERIAL NGC REPRESENTATIVE Footing Subgrade NA Brad Hupy, PE, GE LOCATION OF WORK CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED IN USE Lots 21 & 22 (2 & 3) Mid Size Trackhoe CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY. OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS: I made this site visit as requested by Don Durst to observe the conditions of subgrade for single family homes that will be constructed on Lots 21 and 22. I spoke with Mr. Durst over the phone. At the time of my visit, the contractor had excavated lots 21 to 22 to subgrade elevations. The contractor was in the process of placing forms within lot 21. I observed and probed the subgrade using a 1/2-inch diameter steel foundation probe. The subgrade in the front of the lot consists of very stiff to hard residual soil (silt /clay). Based on observation and probing, the subgrade excavations have been prepared in general conformance with the project specifications and my recommendations and will perform as intended to support single family home foundations. The areas are ready for placement of footing forms and reinforcement. A Preliminary report Is provided solely as evidence that the fleld observation was performed. Observations. and lor conclusions, and /or ® FINAL pREumiNARy recommendaUons conveyed In the flnat report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. A final report is an Instrumem of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the - ITEMS 10 OBSERVE. cCK. OR TEST DURING NEXT VISIT /i£ READ R E NTAT1VE S RE DATE P 1 8/2 1 /t2--- NGC's p re presented on site sorely to observe operations of the contractor Identified, to form opinions about the adeqt icy of those operations. and to report those opinions to our client. The presence and activities of our field representative do not relieve any contractor from Its obligation to meet contractual requirements. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and spedflcations throughout the duration of the project, Irrespective of the presence of our representative. The contractor retains sole responsibility for she safety and the methods. operations. and sequences of construction. Tualatin, Oregon Northwest GEO PHOTO LO Tel (503) 702 8437 Consultants wwwngc- Ilc.com , LLC OWNER/CLIENT PROJECT DATE DAY OF WEEK D R HORTON ALPINE VIEW AUGUST 1 7, 201 2 FRIDAY ' r� (��YY A C 1 +�,,''e1�E y "� . 0 , ;. - 0 . ... „ .. °T d. S ` E '� }''r✓�" i /:i . el "` 4,4.,, , f tr tM)a C . 4 ' '? %i? Y "2.:::' rt. �. t r� h 3 4 Si,;-,..7;;::. ° � � � lut1 F lr # Ir ., 11 „.,,,„,tiii, d t it' � l a i � I �(71 � � # l i# F ° . ( ' � 1 (I[l �P: !(; 1 1ll (�� p, I ! � LC � # '� ' >'� Lot 21 ® i 1 a - • il ,.: • —' k , I +,may - � a ° t FF �� r, t � ,..... ,„.:,, ....:..„4.,...,,,, .., .. , , r: ' ,,,: „ .-' : ; ) -4 ) ' ti ''* 1...4'4, ' - ' ..,,i. % A ., ., ,,, .,., . , _., „", ., ., 4 , ,,,,,, 1 ,. T • ./,...„:„...: ., - 4 ' 4 ,- : ,,, <,,',,',:!..:': ,, ....... ,,,„,,, ,., ,,:.. ,<<, '‘ , ‘11. :', ''''' 1 a;: 442414,1110 11 . ' ' ''S , " '4 'V _ --'-',-,... 1,.- : -:.''' . * ' : . :-.' -- ',- .,.. _ Ak ..., ,..,„,„ , ,, ,.„..,,..,,,,„.:,., ,,,,... ,... _,....„...„,.. . ,, ..,,f_:,_,,, ,...,,,,,,,,...: ,,„,.. -�„. ,. ,„ , � f � , , ,..a,� Lot 22 r ,. , " h, . - ; , i,� g ° ' ' ' ' .1 ; ". . 4 ,;' a4 •' ' " � , ' # .,�. • g 3s: . , . t � - 1.,V . a.« ij:_ "l ,- t ' 4�. '�°°s' + Fw A i. ° •� ai .V., dwY.G � �� d " F ',..,'4, 4 A .2 �y *,t„---..**,1‘', *fig q.E ".� j, •i -{� -; v$ fi n'+ , „., y 4' , l ' :.+s,* t 6 'y' kv i i4444 .. , cr. 6915 SW Nyberg • P104 Tell Tualatin. O 702 regon 77062 FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT Northwest GEO nwgeoconsultants@frontler.com Consultants, LLC PROIECT ID DATE REPORT NO. Alpine View September 4, 2012 8 OWNER /CLIENT OWNER/CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE DAY OF WEEK PAGE D R Horton (DHI) Reed Couch Tuesday 1 of 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME DEPARTURE TIME DHI Don Durst 1300 1345 GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER/TEMPERATURE PERMIT Pacific Earthworks Sunny, 80'F TYPE OF WORK SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF FILL MATERIAL NGC REPRESENTATIVE Footing Subgrade NA Brad Hupy, PE, GE LOCATION OF WORK CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED IN USE Lots 30 & 37 (7 & 11) Mid Size Trackhoe CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY, OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: I made this site visit as requested by Don Durst to observe the conditions of subgrade for single family homes that will be constructed on Lots 30 and 37. At the time of my visit, the contractor had excavated lots 30 to 37 to subgrade elevations. The footing contractor was in the process of placing forms within lot 30. I observed and probed the subgrade using a 1 /2 -inch diameter steel foundation probe. The subgrade in both of the lots was very stiff to hard native silt. Based on observation and probing, the subgrade in both lots has been prepared in general conformance with the project specifications and my recommendations and will perform as intended to support single family home foundations. The areas are ready for placement of footing forms and reinforcement. Attachments: Photo Log A Preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that the field observation was performed Observations, and /or conclusions. and /or Al FINAL PRELIMINARY recommendations conveyed in the final repon may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. A final report is an instrument of professional service Any conclusion drawn from this repon should be discussed W+th and evaluated by the professional involved. �- ITEMS TO OBSERVE, CHECK, OR TEST DURING NEXT VISIT J FIELD REPRESENTATIVE ' - DATE 4111 (7 f --- Z9 /Z NGC's professionals ar L. . resente • Write solely to observe operations of the contractor identified. to form opinions about the adequacy of those operations, and to re rt those opinions to our client The presence and acthnties of our field representative do not relieve any contractor from Its obligation to meet contractual requirements We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the protect, Irrespective of the presence of our representative. The contractor retains sole responsibility for site safety and the methods, operations, and sequences of construction. Tualatin, Oregon Northwest GEO PHOTO LO Tel (503) 702 8437 nwgeoconsultants @frontier.com Consultants, LLC OWNER/CLIENT PROJECT DATE DAY OF WEEK D R NORTON ALPINE VIEW SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 TUESDAY '1 {v _.. ' j-. 9�3 C It I LI 5 t , i e t i"� ._ __._- ._.� 1 _ ; ` - _ Lot 30 a � , � � i � � � � - °` F ew+ , -,... �£ i - .r�_ `''S��}, ; . ?�a ` -- z - 1 , ez ,:tv - 4 , ., Ar ; ,� � T, r � It 9 P 2 " c _ 4 " ' � - �. -, „, '?".•:;. - :,';',.t4,6 .. , t ,.rte;` '^ _. .' i , ,' - f.• ^ . 1 I • �. r F. �, "?E . : ,.. .,- , . 3.i 1.,,� r L,jr ': �, ' ; � : - x - „. 4 _ =. . 4 Lot 37 t tt r E .�.r ri ,V, 4 1 - 1. t' +e1; ;, ^ e —a d sj � .4;4* ' r :.,, tp: ,.. .- ' ' «, ,_ , .� 'a . • ,n y y , a .t' .�;, . W¢Y i'' SZyy "r t {., y " emu` ; „44,m « r w 71C 'w'' . P' �E it t ....;t1'.' as y s � n{`+,� ,t, '� '.'• "y?,' $ 'c o o >„ rr,Pt,,+ S ��„"3�.N >.✓ • <s + +sr , , „, , :i., ,,,, x 3 "�`� ti tr z r' `, F ca f.,tl ! , 7 '� - «s �' Asa a't ,C "�, t� '- ` � �% . >�},. .a a srra r n �� . S '''''''.154: „ T n X r r* ,t �s ! " J „ r , a r� ;. , d �� a f � 4 - " "1i.t'- feu" �; r 'i � � o � w � � � „;;-14 ° war �' �.�'l� � tf°�Y !'iiy�;�r a �. `'� � r�'� � .Jas. • k e ,,.. .:,f w ^r ^'tee -. s - . ' �. ,,1 F - P ' ” - "c a � ; "h'.. °i':r- +.,h-,..i ; ` l> � Y., .-w � s . ,. afi • ��52�.i'�' �` w�.x' "_ JUw�x 691 S SW Nyberg - P104 Tel(S03)�702-8437 062 FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT t nwgeoconsultants @frorttier.com 1 ' ` 1'' ' ' T' ! r t ' PROTECT 1D REPORT NUMBER Alpine View Page 1 of 1 9 OWNER /CLIENT OWNER/CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE DATE DAY OF WEEK DR Horton Don Durst 9/12/12 Wednesday GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME DEPARTURE TIME 2:OOpm 2:30pm GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER/TEMPERATURE PERMIT Sun MST 2012-00130 TYPE OF WORK SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF FILL MATERIAL NGC REPRESENTATIVE Lot Subgrade Paul Crenna, C.E.G. LOCATION OF WORK CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED IN USE Lot 5 (formerly Lot 28) CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY, OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS 1 made this visit at the request of Don Durst (as communicated to Brad Hupy PE, GE) to observe foundation excavation subgrade conditions for single - family home construction on Lot 5 located at 13369 SW Ouzel Lane. While on site, I spoke with Mr. Durst over the phone. At the time of my site visit, the foundation excavation had been completed to an approximate depth of 2 to 4 feet, and foundation forms were partially set. I observed the subgrade soils visually and probed the near surface soils with a steel shaft probe. The subgrade consists of native, clayey silt soil with a very-stiff consistency. Based on our observations and probing, the subgrade has been prepared in general conformance with the project specifications and NW GEO Consultants LLC recommendations, and should perform as intended for support of single - family home foundations as specified in our geotechnical report. dated March 5, 2012. The excavation subgrade is ready for placement of foundation forms. / • iito -... e - _A D live I &MESA JUNE m, 13 f /r1A4/w iso a./ , , M Grz_ A Preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that the field observation was performed Observations, and /or conclusions, and /or 0 FINAL 1r PRELIMINARY recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those mdlcated In a preliminary report- A final report is an instrument of professional service Any conclusions drawn from this moon should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved ITEMS TO OBSERVE, CHECK, OR TEST DURING NEXT VISIT FIELD REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE / DATE / C.LI 1 (:1 (------------- - t 3/4Z ji 2,_ NGC's professionals are represented an site solely to observe operations of the contractor identified, to form opinions about the adequacy of those operations, and to report those opinions to our client The presence and activities of our field representative do not relieve any contractor from its obligation to nett comractuai requirements We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project, Irrespective of the presence of our representative The contractor retains sole responsibility for site safety and the methods, operations. and sequences of construction 1411 SE 30" Avenue, Suite 6 Tel 1503) Oregon 02 8437 FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT Northwest GEO www.ngc•11c.com Consultants, LLC PROTECT ID REPORT NUMBER Alpine View Page 1 of 1 10 OWNER/CUENT OWNER /CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE DATE DAY OF WEEK DR Horton (DHI) Reed Couch 11/5/12 Monday GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME DEPARTURE TIME DHI Kristian Ingebrigtsen 10:OOam 10:30am GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER/TEMPERATURE PERMIT Trademark Landscaping Light Rain TYPE OF WORK SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF FILL MATERIAL MCC REPRESENTATIVE Retaining Wall _ Paul Crenna, C.E.G. LOCATION OF WORK CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED IN USE Lot 3 (Formerly Lot 22) CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY, OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS; I made this visit as requested by Kristian Ingebrigtsen to observe foundation excavation subgrade conditions for an Allen Block retaining wall. I spoke with Mr. Ingebrigtsen over the phone, while on site. At the time of my site visit, the foundation excavation had been completed to an approximate depth of 1 to 4 feet, and the lower two courses of blocks had been placed on a crushed aggregate base. I observed the subgrade soils visually and probed the near surface soils with a steel shaft probe. The subgrade consists of stiff to very- stiff, clayey silt soil. The contractor representative reported that the wall is to be constructed six blocks high with a 2H:1 V slope above. Geotextile reinforcing grid 3 to 4 feet long is placed between first and second blocks, and consists of STRATAGRID 350 per label on roll. 3 inch diameter perforated plastic subdrain pipe is placed behind wall. Block cells on northern end of wall below reinforcing grid were not filled with crushed aggregate. I informed contractor representative that cells should be filled. Observed contractor begin unstacking this portion of wall to perform recommended corrective work. Scheduled NGC soil technician, John MacDonald, to visit the site in afternoon to perform compaction testing, and confirmed compaction test visit schedule with Mr. Ingebrigtsen and Trademark representative. Based on our observations and probing, the subgrade has been prepared in general performance with the project specifications and NW GEO Consultants LLC recommendations, and should perform as intended for support of flexible, segmental block retaining wall systems. A Preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that the field observation was performed. Observations, and /or conclusions, and /or FINAL D PRELIMINARY recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a prelimirrary report A final report is an Instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. ITEMS TO OBSERVE, CHECK, OR TEST DURING NEXT VISIT FIELD REPRESENTATiVE SIGNATURE 1 DATE NGC's professionals are represented on site solely to observe operations of the contractor Identified. to form opinions about the adequacy of those operations, and to report those opinions to our client The presence and activities of our field representative do not relieve any contractor from its obligation to meet contractual requirements. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project, irrespective or the presence of our representative. The contractor retains sole responsibility for site safety and the methods, operations, and sequences of construction 6915 SW Nyberg St. P -104 Tualatin, Oregon FIELD DENSITY TESTING REPORT 97062 Consultants, s. LLC Tel (503) 702 8437 PROJECT NUMBER PROJEC Il e E V iew PAGE 1 OF / PERMIT M f � l ENTAIIVE DATE p Y�INEPK " or /,7n A anh D T - c �OJl 1�1 , & , ARAL CONTRACTOR t e f �NTRACTQ R ES ENTATIVE , d Wi' 7 p or E Time Tr t� � IS ��I dls+l�`ti+ GRADUHi CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATNE �� I �� EgffEMP REPORT NUMBER LOCA11O qF R CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED VI USE / qr yard �airiof �rl / _."" FIELD TESTING REFERENCE CURVE OPTIMUM TEST DRY MOISTURE PERCENT MAXIMUM DRY PASS/ NO. LOCATION ELEVATION DENSITY CONTENT MAXIMUM DENSITY MOISTURE REQUIRED FAIL CONTENT 1 fi 1 ' . ' 11. // 'r P 3 west &,I )-' 1 )-s"r 1 SS 9 6 f ONTRACTOR ACTIVITY, OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: Find Pfl of irany/4r ,4( if ike reei km! . a , 1r #41 / We a ' 4 . Grr4 t i!( 45s / alto! eyerfr. at ,.)- • tTENS TO OBSERVE. CHECK. OR TEST DURING NEXT VISIT F ESE A ME NATURE R 7 2. OA / /1PAY�' k o ' f e f4 J7 i # tr Z NGC' s protasoinnnu aro represented On site aotety *WNW operalans Of the cons domIQod b tram Opinion Owl tho adequacy ihOlo apOt IOIM and to repot those opFMona fa our cIlenl rho orosenco and actinide of our Iliad representative do not relieve any contractor from us Otalpolfon tp moot aalrattuaI roqurronteMS Wo nary on the oonUactor to Comply with ore edema and specifications throughout the duration of me prefect trrespoctive of tho presence of our reproseruaUvo rho vontractor retina note responsibility for silo safety and the methods, operations. and sequences of conduction 1411 SE 30th Avenue, Suite 6 Portland, Oregon 97234 FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT Northwest GEO Tel (503) 702 -8437 www.ngc- Ilc.com Consultants, LLC PROIECT ID DATE REPORT NO. Alpine View November 26, 2012 12 OWNER /CLIENT OWNER/CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE DAY OF WEEK PAGE D R Horton (DHI) Reed Couch Monday 1 of 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME DEPARTURE TIME DHI Kristian Ingebrigtsen 1000 1035 GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER/TEMPERATURE PERMIT Pacific Groundworks Ray El wess Sunny, 40 °F TYPE OF WORK SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF FILL MATERIAL NGC REPRESENTATIVE MSE Wall Subgrade NA Brad Hupy, PE, GE LOCATION OF WORK CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT OBSERVED IN USE Lot 6 /29 Jumping Jack Compactor CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY, OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS: I made this site visit as requested by Kristian Ingebrigtsen to observe the condition of subgrade for an MSE wall that will be reconstructed in the back yard of Lot 6. The retaining wall is being reconstructed to add about 30 feet in length to the existing wall. Wall total height will be 3 blocks high with a 2H:1 V backfill in the back. At the time of my visit, the contractor had prepared the granular pad and first layer of geogrid had been constructed. I observed and probed the subgrade in the front of the wall using a 1 /2 -inch diameter steel foundation probe. The subgrade consisted of medium stiff to stiff silt. We will re -visit later today or tomorrow morning to test density of backfill and check geogrid /drains placement. Based on observation and probing, the construction of the MSE wall at this point have been prepared in general conformance with the project specifications and my recommendations and will perform as intended to support MSE wall. Attachments: Photo Log A Preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that the field observation was performed Observations, and /or conclusions, and /or D FINAL PRELIMINARY recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved ITEMS TO OBSERVE, CHECK. OR TEST DURING NEXT VISIT FIELD REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE \ DATE / ►/ ?7 2 /� NGC's professionals are represented on site solely to observe ra • the contractor identified, to form opinions about the adequacy of those operations, and to report those opinions to our client. The presence and activities of our field representative do not relieve any contractor from its obligation to meet contractual requirements We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project. irrespective of the presence of our representative, The contractor retains sole responsibility for site safety and the methods, operations, and sequences of construction. 1411 SE 30' " Avenue, Suite 6 Northwest GEO Portland, Oregon 97214 PHOTO LOG Tel (503) 702-8437 Consultants, LLC www ngc -IIc com OWNER/CLIENT PROJECT DATE DAY OF WEEK D R NORTON ALPINE VIEW NOVEMBER 26, 2012 MONDAY f R � _ ,• t� u1. w . , t � ' k. \; 'R 644 % r , 1 �' C r 1 `� 1 a � V i ' ti ' s _ ' 'Lot 6 — MSE waII - ta`- 6915 SW Nyberg St. P -104 Tualatin, Oregon FIELD DENSITY TESTING REPORT Northwest GEO 97062 Consultants, LLC Tel (503) 702 8437 PROJECT NUMBER NAME v _ w /�� 1/1)19 PAGE ' OF 1 PERMIT / tl fV!/ y , • I • • • • ENT • ", SENTATIVE OATS D. OF WEEK V L O TRA TOR G y, • q�+ OR RE NTATIVE ARRIVAL E DEP RE TIME onOh ' e ell [4141 r/ 73 0 DOG GRADING ONTRACT 1 I GRADING CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE REPORT N MBER " dem Lail dSLQ`I)M ,dr zzle ,7 } AND rer ' q /! 8 dent Gh IA N 4 ' M' i 1 t4J RVED AASHTOT1E AASNTOT99 0 TTPE OF WORK LOFA 1 a 6 re fain LA / — FIELD TESTING REFERENCE CURVE OPTIMUM TEST DRY MOISTURE PERCENT MAXIMUM DRY PASS/ NO. LOCATION ELEVATION DENSITY CONTENT MAXIMUM DENSITY MOISTURE REQUIRED fAiL CONTENT 1 1d ).-9 1al 71i 9.l 131.8 ID 92 P 1l1t 7. 93 � /' I. a g. I 9 p 1 .3.4 el 9� 9`? P . _ ., CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY, OBSERVATIONS. CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: he L../ FCe ' 4 bac f'1 e . fti ' e, ti hiris t b-A1 00 ITEMS TO OBSERVE, CHECK, OR TEST DURING NEXT VISIT C `_� FIELD R E NTATIVE SIGNA R, , . BY DATE ` NGC's professionals � � n ere represented on 040 solely to operations of the contractor identAied i0 form opinions WOO Ina Weq u , •t ose - ., r , to r epot those opinions to ur ' . pliant The presence orM activIlres of our held representative do not relieve any contractor from io Obligation to moot contractual roeu • ` e rely , comfy • tractor to coly will) the plane co ve , specifications throughout the durotron of fhe protect, irrespective of the presence of Our represenlahvo The contractor rooms solo re I` r•Il • :fety and the methods, operations anti sequences of conSlructIOn