Loading...
Correspondence I• February 12, 2001 crry OF T1G John Finklea, Architect OREGON 3223 SW Naito Parkway Portland, Oregon 97299 RE: Tualatin Valley Center SIT 2001 -00004 8770 SW Scoffins BUP2069=00045 00 f Dear Applicant: Your plans for the proposed construction have been reviewed; the following items require your attention. Accessibility: 1. Your project requires 54 parking spaces. Under OSSC, Section 1104, Three (3) accessible spaces are required. Provide details. 2. Handicap Parking sign heights from grade to bottom of the sign is seven feet. ODOT Site: 1. Provide a Geo- Technical report for liquefaction potential. OSSC, Section 1804.1.1, 1804.5. 2. Provide the total cubic yards for each of the following: (a) Excavation (b) Fill Fire Life Safety: 1. In order to provide exit compliance from the existing floor to the required second exit, the door in the existing corridor adjacent to the reception area must be removed. OSSC, Section 1004.2.2 allows the use of one intervening room (hallway), however, the classroom in addition to the two Counsel and single waiting room exceeds exception 2. By removing this door, the hallway becomes a single intervening room exiting into a rated corridor. 2. Glazing in rated corridors shall comply with OSSC, Section 1004.3.4.3.2.2, and shall not Exceed 25% of the area of a common wall with any room. Glazing as shown exceeds the code requirement. Provide details. 3. Doors within rated corridors shall comply with OSSC, Section 1004.3.4.2.1. Provide details. 4. The elevator openings require smoke tight 20 minute doors. Provide details. OSSC, Section 1004.3.4.3.2. 5. Detail 3, drawing 3.1. The column is part of the one -hour corridor, provide details on how You will protect the column. 6. The kitchen cafeteria area is considered an intervening room. Corridors shall not be Interrupted by an intervening room. OSSC, Section 1004.3.4.4. Provide details. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 • 7. The door entering the existing waiting room adjacent to admitting must be removed. The Situation here is the same as setout in item #1 FLS above.. 8. Door # 224B- Ensure the one -hour requirement is continuous, and not interrupted by the Door and frame. 9. Hallway 208 and reception 204 causes the corridor to be interrupted. OSSC, Section 1004.3.4.4. 10. Provide 2 -A fire extinguishers throughout so that the travel distance to an extinguisher does not exceed 75'. UFC Std. 10 -1. 11. Please revisit your means of egress identification to ensure it complies with OSSC, Section 1003.2.8.2. Show all changes on your reflective ceiling plan. 12. Door 224A shall swing in the direction of travel, and shall have a fire- resistive rating of 20 minutes. OSSC, Section 1003.1.5 and 1004.3.4.3.2.1. 13. The guardrail adjacent to room 203 shall be 42" in height. OSSC, Section 509. 14. Studs exceeding 10 feet in height shall be fire blocked at 10' intervals. OSSC, Section 708.2.1. Provide details. Energy Code: 1. Provide Oregon Non residential Energy Code forms 5a through 5c and related work sheets. Structural: 1. The Engineer of record shall provide an original seal on drawings affected by his structural calculations. 2. The Engineers analysis doesn't include loads for an exit facility @ 100 psf. OSSC, Table 16A, Footnote 5. Provide details. 3. Sheet 4 from the Engineers calculations — The information shown below the shearwall schedule shall appear on drawing 2.3 . 4. The Floor/Roof construction identification symbols on sheet 4.0 (IE -W 1/W3 /Etc.), shall be identified on sheets 3.1 and 3.2 as a detail. Suggest you use 4/3.0. Special Inspections: Provide the information highlighted in yellow on the enclosed special inspection forms, and return same to this writer. Provide three (3) complete sets of Civil/ Architectural. If you have questions, please feel free to call me at 503- 639 -4171 X392. Sincerely, kekhZ4 Robert Poskin, CET CBO Senior Plans Examiner j e , (0 2_ oo/ --do-o zis ,.....,4, _,JA, CI' OF TIG OREGON January 3, 2002 Tri Tech 6603 NE 137 Ave Vancouver, WA 98682 Re: Tualatin Valley Adolecent Center 8770 SW Scoffins St. Tigard, OR 97223 The City of Tigard has completed the review of the submitted plans for the HVAC installation at the above referenced address. This review was performed under the provisions of the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC), 1999 edition. And The Uniform Fire Code w/TVFR revisions. The plans are approved subject to the following conditions. • The plans submitted are not in compliance above mentioned codes please address the issues noted below and resubmit revised plans showing compliance with code. 1) Plans submitted show ducts penetrating rated corridor walls and serving the exit without the required smoke and fire dampers. UBC 713.10, 713.11 2) HVAC units in excess of 400 lbs shall have a structural review of the units, seismic and supporting roof framing. , / D.. S i".r D Jone P ans Examiner c. File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 , , , (- - 1 - 7 6' -=''' ,. JOHN W. FINKLEA . •ARCHITECT• HI 1 r 1L IA ' ' h IA U I I 3223 S.W. NAITO PARKWAY PORTLAND OR 97201 503- 248 -0617 FAX 503 -222 -9284 EMAIL: JWF279@AOL.COM December 4, 2001 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd , , ' Tigard OR 97223 RE: BUP 2000 -00045 , Dear Sirs: Enclosed please find revised architectural, civil, and electrical plans for inclusion into the existing permit set. The revisions /changes ,are" as "follows: ' . Civil - Sheet .0 -04 shows new &:sanitary ;sewer on Scoffins Street. This lateral will not , _ , be constructed as our engineers have determined it will be feasible to connect the new- building to the exiting building's sanitary sewer system. , Electrical " _ - Additional circuit and conduit have been added to E1 ".0,and E6.0 for sump pump" at proposed water vault shown on C -04. - These changes have been reviewed and determined not to change occupant loads, life safety or structural design as previously shown. These drawings are primarily to coordinate the City's record sets with the contractors cons ruction sets. , If your have any . questions please call me at 503) 248 -0617. . Thank you, Mark D..Hinrich /AVhitect John W. Finklea.Architect . } diA,0?)/.- ereiCz/5 F ' 6 -Zc f -OTJ Q `f JOHN W. FINKLEA •ARCHITECT• I 1, es III I (( i A. ■1 (O: FROM: •/ / /1 J COMPANY: DATE: / 210 0i FAX NUMBER: PROJECT #: TOTAL PAGES: Tvc - 5ce rNs S ❑ URGENT ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT , OR YOUR RECORDS ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ COPY TO FOLLOW IN MAIL • NOTES /COMMENTS: ' • . (4 ).! . . . . * 6 v 40,9' : ' (4) 0, ,: ! ftreetitieoc ititj4iipaggritp6-, : • : � I . . ■ 3223 S.W. NAITO PARKWAY PORTLAND OREGON 97201 503 -248 -0617 FAX 503 -222 -9284 EMAIL: JWF279 @AOL.COM PLEASE RECYCLE Pill Tualatin Valley Centers Project No.: 704 -05125 July 19, 2000 Page 4 4 .4 S eismic Considerations L The site falls within seismic Zone 3 with a seismic zone factor of 0.3 as classified by the 1998 State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code, an amendment to the Uniform Building Code, 1997 edition. Based on the local geology and the soil conditions encountered, the soil profile at the site is SD with site coefficients of C = 0.36 and C = 0.54 (Table 16J, 16Q, and 16R). Our evaluation of the subsurface conditions at the site did not indicate a significant potential for soil liquefaction, primarily due to the absence of groundwater, or landslide hazards associated with a seismic event at the site, or in the vicinity of the project site. However, it should be noted that a Seismic Site Hazard Investigation for hazardous /essential was beyond the present scope of services for this project. Such an evaluation could be performed at an additional fee with your written authorization. 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the results of our field work, laboratory evaluation, and engineering analyses, it is our I opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed structure and associated improvements provided the following recommendations are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. As previously indicated, a fat clay soil layer was encountered at this site from depths of about 2 feet below existing site grades extending to depths of approximately 4.5 feet below existing site grades. It is our understanding that the finished floor elevation of the proposed building addition will match that of the existing building. Based on our visual observations of the site, this will require cuts on the order of about 2 to 3 feet. Fat clays are potentially expansive, and can shrink/swell with corresponding changes in moisture content. In order to reduce /control the risk of shrinking /swelling of the on -site soils, it is important to maintain the moisture content of the bearing soils, consisting of fat clay soils, located beneath floor slabs, pavements, and foundations at or above (0 to +2 percent) optimum moisture content until concrete /asphalt placement. If optimum moisture conditions can not be maintained, then it is recommended that the fat clay soils, where encountered, be overexcavated a minimum depth of 1 -foot below bearing level and replaced with a less- plastic, structural fill (lean clay, silt, sand, or gravel). 5.1 Site Preparation In general, we recommend that all structural improvement areas be drained of surface water, and stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil materials, highly saturated or disturbed soil, and any other deleterious materials encountered at the time of construction. We envision that initial site preparation will consist of topsoil stripping. We anticipate that topsoil stripping of the surface soils to a depth of 6 to 9 inches may be required. Additional site preparation will depend upon the proposed site grades and building features. Any footings, walls, slabs -on- grade, and pavements associated with the existing house should be completely JOHN W. FINKLEA •ARCHITECT• 3223 S W NAITO PARKWAY PORTLAND OR 97201 503- 248 -0617 FAX 503- 222 -9284 EMAIL :JWF279@AOL.COM- - April 2, 2001 Robert Poskin City of Tigard Tigard OR. 97223 RE: SIT 2001 -00004 B U P00045 Dear Robert • Enclosed please find sheet 6.2 containing the following information regarding the . glass:block 1.. The block size (8 "x8") and pattern are shown in drawing 3/6.2. 2. Manufacturer's installation instructions have been added to sheet6.2. ' 3. Total area of glass block proposed is 90.66 square feet which is less than the 94 square feet,maximum allowed. 4. 1- hour,frame construction details have been shown as 5/6.2, 6/6.2, and 7/6:2. - This; should complete your, review of this project. If you have any questions, please call me at 503-248-0617. Sincerely, . P> ( ' Mark D. Hinrichs, Arc ect John W. Finklea Architect mdh /mf Attachments • Tualatin Valley Centers Project No.: 704 -05125 July 19, 2000 Page 9 Proctor). Fill materials should be placed in layers that, when compacted, do not exceed about 6 inches. Care in the placement and compaction of fill behind walls must be taken in order to insure that undue lateral loads are not placed on the walls. 5.6 Drainage Considerations Any areas of the building which are to be developed below the exterior site grade must be provided with a well- designed, drainage system in order to control hydrostatic pressures against walls, seepage of groundwater through basement walls, etc. Under no circumstances should surface runoff water be led into foundation drains. Foundation drains should be placed at the base of footings in order to prevent surface and shallow perched water from migrating beneath the footings. Surface run -off from roofs, parking areas, etc., should be tightlined to the storm sewer or other approved disposal areas. 5.7 Floor Slab Support The proposed slab -on -grade may be supported on structural fills placed over undisturbed, firm, native soils (silt, fat clay, or sandy silt) after the removal of topsoil and the upper soils have been proofrolled with a fully loaded dump truck in order to confirm their firmness. Any soft or otherwise unsuitable areas observed should be overexcavated down to firm subgrade and replaced with structural fill. Fat clays are potentially expansive, and can shrink/swell with corresponding changes in moisture content. In order to reduce /control the risk of shrinking /swelling of the on -site soils, it is important to maintain the moisture content of the bearing soils, consisting of fat clay soils, located beneath floor slabs at or above (0 to +2 percent) optimum moisture content until concrete placement. If optimum moisture conditions can not be maintained, then it is recommended that the fat clay soils, where encountered, be overexcavated a minimum depth of 1 -foot below bearing level and replaced with a less- plastic, structural fill (lean clay, silt, sand, or gravel). In order to provide uniform subgrade reaction beneath any proposed floor slab -on- grade, we recommend that floor slabs be underlain by a minimum of 6 inches of free - draining (a maximum particle size of 3/4 -inch with less than 5 percent material passing the No. 200 sieve), well - graded gravel or crushed rock base course. Base course material should be moisture conditioned to within 0 to +2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted by mechanical means to a minimum of 95 percent of the material's maximum dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor). Fill materials should be placed in layers that, when compacted, do not exceed about 8 inches. JOHN W. FINKLEA •,ARCHIT-ECT• .. . ' III { A II 'h 111% 1 I I I 3223 S W NAITO PARKWAY PORTLAND OR 9720I' 503 -248 -0617 FAX 503- 222 -9284 EMAIL :JWF279 @AOL.COM 7 February 27, 2001 Robert Poskin City of Tigard MAR 200 13125 SW HaII Blvd Tigard OR 97223 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT , RE: SIT 2001 -00004 • BUP; 2000 -00045 , . Dear Robert: • , Following are itemized-responses to your checksheet dated 2/12/2001 ©e . Three ' (3). accessible spaces' have been provided. See site plan, sheet 1.0 and , • detail 3/1.0. p The handicap parking signage detail has been corrected to show 7' -0" to. the ' bottom of the signage. or Z 3. A geotech report containing liquefaction information has been included with this submittal. - • . ' Our preliminary calculations show the following: • Excavation 925 cu. yds. • /• . Fill 525 cu.:yds. • ' The door dividing the corridor on the lower level, has been removed as ' suggested. _ - The wall areas in room 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 209 and 210 have. been d calculated to verify a maximum 25% glazing ratio: In rooms where 25% was exceeded, the window area has been reduced. . Doors . within rated corridors will be 20- minute rated doors with smoke O / gasketing,and automatic closers. See door schedules on'3.IA.and 3.2A. r • - • Response (cont.) . 2/27/01. . Page.2 - . D The elevator openings have been protected by adding a smoke tight20- minute . .door on an electromagnetic hold open.. See detail 2/3.2. • O The column., shown in detail 3/3:1 will be protected with 5/8" type 'X' gypsum board on all sides from floor to underside of ceiling. . 10.: ►he kitchen /cafeteria walls are to be constructed as one -hour comdor and herefore shall not be construed as an intervening room. 1004:3.4:4 exception #1 The door adjacent to the existing admitting room has been removed as . C.� suggested. . 'l7l Door # 224B will not interrupt the continuous one -hour construction of comdor b 224.. / Hallway 208 will be constructed with one -hour con with all adjacent . i ll . V doors being 20- minute rated doors'with smoke gaskets and automatic closers. L Fire extinguishers are located throughout the building so th travel distance is 15't less. than :75' -07: _ . 1 . /Additional - "EXIT" signs have been added to the RCP's on 3.3 and 3.4 as 0' required in'OSSC 1003.2.8.2 I (� Door 224A has been revised to swing in direction of travel and has been classified as a 20- minute rated door: )/The guardrail adjacent to room 213 had been revised to show a height of 42" A.F.F. X ibStuds exceeding' 10' in' height shall be fire- blocked at 10' -0" intervals.,This note ,has been added to sheets 2.1.and 2.2. - • 1 .r nergy - code forms 5a through 5c and related worksheets have. been included . • with this submittal: • Response (cont.) . 2/27/01 Page 3 • Drawings affected by structural engineer have been stamped with an original seal: See sheets 2.1, 22, 2.3, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, • z( analysis for an exit facility will be forwarded to. your office as they become available: 74 K.. heet.2.3 has been revised to include the requested structural information: • .heets 3.1 and 3.2 have been revised ,to include the wall type schedule ef l Special inspection forms have been included with this" submittal. • This should complete your review process; for this building /site: If you have any additional questions or concerns, please call me at 503- 248 -0617. Sincerely, 7 // ( /f >>- :40 Mark D. Hinrich , Architect . John W. Finklea Architect ;• . mdh /mf/720000 , .. Enclosures: Geo -tech report Oregon Non - residential Energy Code Forms • Special Inspection Forms , .. • 02/27/2001 13:07 5032229284 J FINKLEA ARCHITECT PAGE 01 . at,0 Cth JOHN W. FINKLEA •ARCHITECT• . I . ■ 1=■ . - • TO: 6007/7 ~801, POW") FROM: I11.Iriv Ngwe CUMPAN L LLLL � DATE: LLL 1117 FAX NUMBER: V PROJECT IP: ` TOTAL PAGES. 503 (o8 7 2 ° I / _ .rt4 � . V4€ e ❑ URGENT OR REVIEW AND COMMENT p L/ ❑ FOR YOUR RECORDS ❑ PLEASE REPLY • ❑ AS REQUESTED 0 COPY TO FOLLOW IN MAIL NOTES /COMMENTS: : :60y- . . . • • , . . : . . . . . .. . . . : .• . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . ik 4- leloi4A.,--,;12. -rbi en./op, e4h/4/65 lel/el ®eA 'ro Si': o AADi A c- ... *tbit +4, • . • . . glifte- I 'e " '' t . : 4� t, T , l� / tie- Y.vr/ or- : AO. � / vtfif Awy ,Ai t o,✓,4-t- . . --- re # 0 : 0 * - :11 :: : : • , 2it8 - Da/7 . : . • 3223 S.W. NAITO PARKWAY PORTLAND .OREGON 97201 503- 248.0617 FAX 503-222-9284 EMAIL: JWF279 @AOL.COM PLEASE RECYCLE 02/27/2001 13:07 5032229284 J FINKLEA ARCHITECT PAGE 02 ISI,./0a o a 0 we row, il ! Fil i 1F Mai S A ME , 2 11111111■. l . . •...., l , ' ;111■11111111■ :: : a ,: :. 4 'G ,� r g '! 11111111111 !! : .: ? 1 � !! ! iiuinuuuun - � •1 11. 1! -- . , . 1 1 1� ■r � 1 ! ! I i f .. r ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■r NM t „i 41 1=. . :. :-_,-,i�11►_, ■■1.1 ■I . ,� ■ II■1 ■1111■1■� ` 1111 ■111 ■111 ; t F i- . 1 ■ ■ ■.....■I i it11�1111111`.► 1 111 111 P 11111111111rwit]Iiii ►, e F ; : : ,...„.,.. am .... Halt' ' '. • :'•... . „' ...'.. 7' ,. 1 I 7 ...... ? ^ M111111111■ it i... - r s 1►10∎ 1111 x:11 ■111111■■1111111 ' 111111 ■■ ,m 11_1111111 I @\ 1 11111111113111111111121 ; 1 10� ■Cif ' : d,. a ; .; c: 1 ■ 1 ,1111.1 II I: /I V I IIa ■1 - v �IIIIIIII1111 ►:1111 111/P11111:: :3D •, @ 1111! III11111111. a a I. w•.4.7__7 ° $ rgv 02/27/2001 13:07 5032229284 J FINKLEA ARCHITECT PAGE 03 V i / 1 t 1 t ; I 1 r- i l 1 G 0 0 0 / i t 0 0 0 o T1 111 ;° 0 0 -� i1 1 . g- 7 limmulmmEl ° 0 limmimi � � .. < W I , molt ! ow ° _ �.11111111� - I .. [I — 0 ... -- 1 1111 ■11111..111 „ , ,,,, I , ! , „ _i_._,, i img•Iiinimorpul - mm a l 1 l11:11111•.i Illoi-■ ° -- :-- -. m i l ) ... immEr___._ ____ - - �_ �I �e 111 ® 1111 111111 ��11111 _ 'I1 ■11 1 ; � I r, � ! ® ■>i.=011 r arm , . ■MM��II _tl ..�- ■■ter ..lNm l _ - r -i, lommulumiiimpi 1 Willi RI �cto1e� o �! ro iii t1�111 lli _ �_ ��__ .. - - -- i ni11111 ■■■■ ■I °ii i� - - - � • # I � � r rT ■� ■1 E EE i , i i 11 ■1 _,11 j •;• 1 ■1.1111 ° e 1. i.--- . - L -- - --- nr z_ vr 2t . t 02/21/2003 16:24 5032229284 J ARCHITECT PAGE 02 • JOHN W. FINKLEA •_ - ARCHITECT • ' i 1 X 11 I ' • 3223 S.W. NATIO Pk !KrR' n,AND OR 97239. 503- 248 -0617 FAX 503.- 222 -9'284 EMAIL 1WF279®AOL.COM February 21, 2003 • City Of Tigard F 1L E COP)! Building and Planning . . 13215 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 • RE: Permit # -00045 • • . . . Tualatin Valley Centers — Adolescent Day Treatment .8770 SW Scoffins Street, Tigard - Oregon. ' The City of Tigard Building and Planning Department: John W. Finklea Architect °has reviewed the construction of the addition to an • existing building for Tualatin Valley Centers. To the best of my knowledge the building was constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications and the • building meets the UBC Structural Specialty Code. This architect has reviewed the City, of Tigard building inspection card and it appears the structure was approved through its various building phases by the appropriate budding officials. - . • . • Pie- -e do not hesitate to.cail if you have any questions regarding this letter. ' ohn W. , 1 • Jwflmf 720000102 -21-03 • • • • JOHN W. FINKLEA •ARCHITECT• 11"11 TO: FROM: 00 P./A) i Pe6/ COMPANY: DATE: & FAX NUMBER: PROJECT #: TOTAL PAGES: 71-e'° o URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT 0 FOR YOUR RECORDS o PLEASE REPLY 0 AS REQUESTED 0 COPY TO FOLLOW IN MAIL NOTES/COMMENTS: • . . ? • • •• • 6.A07 e rePVIPT. Ad* atev057P. . . • . . . . • • . . . . . . .• • . . . z .• • . . • . • . • • . . . . . . . . • . . . . • • • . . . . • . . . • • . . . . • • 3223 S.W. NAITO PARKWAY PORTLAND OREGON 97201 503-248-0617 FAX 503-222-9284 EMAIL: JWF279@AOL.COM PLEASE RECYCLE 10/22 /2001 17.04 5016347297: cir.Y of Tigard Iaj l) 0 / � . COUNTYWIDE . - TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PAYMENT OPTION FORM • »o sw SCOF sT Bch 23, ZOQ - Site Address Datc TU VA EY N D. BUP20Q - Q445 Project Name Plan Check # I realize that I must make a decision on payment of the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) at this time. Therefore. I request the following (choose whichever option or options are applicable): Cash or Check Credit Vo n Bancroft or Installment Payments or • The Ordinance allows for deferral of payment of the TIF until issuance of the occupancy permit if the TIF is greater than $5,000. If the TIF meets this . requirement, I also request this option. I understand the TIP must be paid prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. I also understand that the TIF will be recalculated based on the prevailing rates at the time of payment. Please be advised that TIF rates may /¢crease up to six percent each July 1st. This rate increase is not subject to appeal. (. :.Gru a,.,- G d'u / A Np OWNER/APPLICANT OWNER/AAP C cc: Building Permit Fite Payment Opuon Notebook r 1 i:\dsnlfotms■tifsub.doc )/3 /01 : r:: = r intl. :rC.ui Jun -04 -03 11:22A HBH Consulting Engineers 503 670 0540 P.02 H B H C t. 11 ' ii I I !) [ I I �, I i 1 (f h' r •� I I:;I:, SW l7urh,un k'!,)(1, tiuih' F.') • Iig.Irll. {)n!_� 2'4 5i)i, +(170- 04'I9 •ru\ ii1.1 /( O•(I')-1l) May 9, 2003 • Mr. John W. Finklea ME COPY 3223 SW Naito PKWY Portland, OR 97201 Re: Tualatin Valley Center Project Certification g77t) 5GD1,644, Dear John, HBH Consulting Engineers, Inc. has reviewed the construction of the sitework and improvements in S.W. Scoffins Road related to the addition on the Tualatin Valley Center in Tigard, Oregon. There were some site revisions made on -site, which were constructed per the architect's direction. Outside of these changes, the construction was in substantial conformance with the plans with the exception of an agreement for a seal coat and striping of the asphalt within two years that offset issue with compaction. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, HBH Consulting Engineers, Inc. David K. Boatman, PE Principal DKB: Irw • L: \2000 - 008 \docs\);.o9.Q3 F,mpI certific�tion.�oc n'I ■'�.Y.1�L� l ■ rl Vlff 11111k`I11.11 ■ 4b :11'`I" ■ A,I<I,').4,I1 :'I ■ `.I')I w,liI'r ■ Ird11`I l,rtcltwl'• 02/06/2001 11:40 5032229284 J FINKLEA ARCHITECT PAGE 01 ) JOHN W. FINKLEA •ARCHITECT- TO: N FROM; 11/ G� ,_ COMPANY: DATE: 2 4 01 FAX NUMBER; • PROTECT A: TOTAL PAGES: 4 ,03 644 - a 211 1 Zaoio ❑ URGENT FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ FOR YOUR RECORDS ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ COPY TO FOLLOW 1N MAIL NOTES /COMMENTS: !Ae £ fiUdeY 7 Wit/ five- &VG &x) Y JU i7 vJ AWE. %I* d OF' 77/41.47iN ti 44y . ems Am> 77/11 iviuu mom. ge cuff" nit rat, Awl siovvtiowp yam ....... isr 44 4•0001 pig. dovi DES l oD f41fir/ i Axe m4'la T t ,r# vmY ....r..wavoi. ..4 Teri. wrie, E,57s4 p3 LPG.' S /- M. atigsuP,o/ - t 000/ eseMIA/A454 wzb Wig /Jew aft-4Cf 'S eArir a 042 ia ei4G`er Amer • ?Fl /Ti�uti ./fit/ //E~ • . . Pusal.e, 1m5 Mrro :4. ‘4•4611J crime* • yala ■ .* "waver. /G You Ovi ,mvY . 0001/0 $710 psi • - — - ■ 3223 S.W. NAITO PARKWAY PORTLAND OREGON 97201 503- 248 -0617 FAX 503 -222 -9284 EMAIL: JWP279 @AOL,COM PLEASE RECYCLE A A A . 5. I I I I I 1 l I l I 1 I 1 I I 1 m CV COINS , Xtf Y// OFFICE GOUNS GOUNS a I!. _ ImmiI 1 i • 1 T 7 - fj � /% IiIIII� /i 'r � � Atar Z 4,4 f ' 1 / EL . I R ill i mi .:;; , e R BR BR 8 �� I ii � GLASSRGOM • w �i 0 \ 1 X 1 " ;• '� x H W **, a '- Z ill 1 i i /J V " ' 51 � S T � OFF OFFICE OFFICE Z H �� i L` ACTIVITY OFFICE OFF ICE / RGUP f�l"1 w w r• / I. MI MOM ww,ws _ — • 4 r 1 ,� ti( /] 1 ►llil�l�/ H SEC ROOM Zr • - Mir T • _ — OFFICE OFFICE • � I T � co N � CLASSRGGI I L---. d m 4 cv A s a C•1 GL ::..�Fcc vl'1 m CN --i- CL,-.z RGG�t - - I L __ — • • RI • A N N 1 .- L m.a LIFE - 5,4FETY PLAN - LOWER FLOOR PLAN C . I/16 " =1' - 72000 LAYOUT r • I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I m `� �I OFFICE OFFICE _fFICE OFFICE � OFFICE • FICE CIFfICE •EPIC= mil_ • ` ` ///77". • • / � N 01 11 • 07"/ / / 11 i _ iii><� STAIR • f , � - / //, 1".:0' 1".:0' ri / t ' ENTRY o BR�B R • !•I - Q • BR 6R 0 •/ t GROUP RN GROUP F 1 ` j N GROUP 1- w x ST. O& i / / � (s) tU! _ RECEPTI -.I / - F- fi i - LOUNGE _ — -� — -- W ::I L / VY J s oM r� R r ' ' i LL ii . d . 0 OPEN TO '/ IGN�1.�1� s __ Ze � � I OFF ICE 1� ' v '• ' c��cGUF F co .a f YOUNG Y LUNG cn c c�;IL� • GiiIL.; � i N I 7��ER�iF=1' ?'er..' Fl 1 . 1 -- L .L......_....tii .:FFIC:.. c-1 ID IM N N mL m � LIFE - SAFETY PLAN - UPPER FLOOR PLAN ' VIC, " =1' -)" 12000LAYOUT .‘ ' . _ r ,C•f • • 1 March 6, 2001 A.G. Rollins • C OF T IGARD PO Box 358. OREGON Gresham, OR 97030' • • aui _ 060 PERMIT NO: S 5 OWNER: Tualatin Valley Center _ PROJECT ADDRESS: -8770 SW Scoffms, Tigard, Oregon 97223 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: New Office Complex TYPES OF SPECIAL INSPECTION: As setout on the enclosed form The owner has notified us that he /she will retain your services to perform Special - Inspections in accordance with the provisions of the State Building Code, permit • documents and special inspection requirements. The owner or the owner's agent must also confirm with you that they have authorized you to do the special inspection work. As the regulatory agency, the City requires that you do the following: 1. Submit copies of all inspection reports promptly to the building division, Architect, engineer, and the contractor. 2. Maintain one copy of each field report at the job site. 3. Submit a final report at the completion of each category of work that you Inspect. (See UBC Appendix Chapter 13 for soils special inspection final report requirements.) If you fail to comply with the above requirements, there may be cause for the City to revoke your authority as special inspector for this job. Should you have any questions, please call me at (503) 639 -4171 X 392. Sincerely, _, , � Ro • - rt D. Poskin, CET, CBO Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772