The URL can be used to link to this page

Plans / 7L2 -o sC 5,11_0 /(s f.►-1 r2c1 \ AA, ° 9 7 — c. )(ti6riNcT ti L 1% / „( (.5 c3 Gice ck97 0.1/4 -El r` 0 , 4o no ty• cLv \I- GE v\`',03)' ct loo' 0 x, LI\ <-,` 1 0 - V '1 � < 31 I►c, ,. a 1 w I Z2 O4 sc.‘, 5cf70L16 1,A40 s'77 MS gi 1E- 11 A Qat I. 6t 01TV:id Q )3 _1 •, 7 n - I O , r � • .3 0 1 2 2 66 SW Schatz fy /O. p A RESTgeone1 • ' - GROUP ' M 0690 SW Bancroft Street I PO Box 69039 • Portland, OR 97201 Tel: 503.224.9560 • Net: into©grpmack.com • Fax: 503.228.1285 PROJECT #: 197190 DATE: June 20, 1997 DESIGNERS: LBO /JDM GREENWAY TOWN CENTER CANOPY UPGRADE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS CANOPY BEAMS B 1 - B4 WOOD TECHNOLOGIST REPORT W 1 - W3 rnvr 64 't en, 0. 04 • I: \STRUC7 \GRFI:N WAYU TL.WPD CA.tiI o p' $ EAM; • flel e s D - 7 - 1)(2 Dr s14 '-1 Er) as 6 -1,8 3' /6/ It S: 170 - A =%. -' I =/51?-- a 77,k1 F T /LX fta of - /(7 NSF Sit E.45,- 1+ -- 1.5 pi; Pcx)F 2ic e �b �t. - 24- psF c r4/ /-!4i ?x loci 1b - ?.g III F P V8 n o 7P L14 /tT3/ ktEtl ! p 1F Miss ,-? 1 I'f r.. 5f/0 a uE !.0 Ail : 5 ' r 3 O 7:14 &-a ('OZf' +.Qzs)( ) t A .6.a.C10)4 6.0 ,(6d, 6.1s > - c71,; o a rolz 2 e , 's Fn•l 4 (2.k F. v1 \ri p( 7 C. By SD I - 1 Date -- 0.1 7 G R O_U P ACKENZIEI Job It (1 -77ft7a • 0690 SW Bancroft St /PO Box 69039 Portland, OR 97201.0039 Sht. _) _ of Tel: 503.224.9560 Net: info8grpmack.com Fax: 503.228.1285 ateii GRODr M CKENZIE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED o ria k • SSA - U) -0 i 7 VC / t: 4, ( LA I c06 X21 f ,02rj �� t 2�� 11 &17.4 A > 22.1 fki rN $ ? E C tr3 'lo x 13tf7 • 511111( - 30 o - r 5 : rj (o21 1 - ) = t 23 kiE (G2 .. � ? (,�w A > �2 7w e;1. a 173;i( ri ?'G 5rA,1 4 - Tv.4 : , la* Mir( S / €r tic '3'fs'aI 7.■A-(= G=p '4 = t276 7 240``7' • ' 2 406 '° A. > 43,7 - J�JIr( SI ?L �c(; 3 /a y 22.E Ft L Lo VAS'( 0r) S i+o vLI S *cA -r-1 p. - -'(z ok. 6Re.tzit V'// By J_9 Date ( CO G R o _ M ACK Luz E l Job N /97 Pr ° 0690 SW Bancroft St /PO Box 69039 Portland, OR 97201 -0039 Sht. 1/ of — Tot: SU3.22.4.Y..6U Not: i nluvc9INmALA.coot Fox: SU3.228.I2US d t'fl/ utour MAL AIN[IL. ALL N1411I5 AL.IA V,u E- i=3t .-mac l.. t5 ArJ3 �'i -4::. 'fA__ e ;.-t: i o I . • I .. - ....- o H -0. • I. I • \, C(' i'' 1 � -'-:. - : ii__ _ __ Q 'a° 1 '" 6 1 c I _ 20'± ).. o ►_E)^vrJ1id,C SAl 4 hS Fr.kfl•-- EE M (Sew - ••%7�i -i c] , DIV 1 (J.3 - (2c -P1-F P M . M. -. 3 c IQ - - fi I.1 (24) = 27coo i = I p°) 10 1' ° N , N '" V - 5 . 0 1.-b F.) _ 1 ° ) E D +' 1 ,, - 2'6,2 1 r5 o i w E i l a ((a x 21 " 7 - - Z4-12 ‘N 4 0 3 2 = 1.Coc P`oc a E on +'' 3 • ET , x 0 0 0 co 2 = L 3CO2> pkf- a , m H z 0 EK «Tt I-1 &N 1 tin - 31(1:::'.›e- 1 , `"j m N H M !I • o k�L - �ll 2 t 24 F - v4 /DF o F _. C.A.A -kr -e. 1/2%% tacos S 2x se INcx e- 1 Pfa-55u Re TRE/37 1.4 CUir cD, A-L ro • 0 AA S 3 1 IA p 3 671 1 ■ _ 1_00 - `., ;I >: Fota 0 - \C ,,V 1 t 1.1 l_ I Ji0 G�� `. i ° i vb low � , 303, _ - - -- - -- - - - -- - -- - -- bp. r CD t 01996 GROUP MACKENZIE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ®r1-- - 2 x6� I 60 .; . • - -. - _ .. S -. VAIG. (-p / 6zu cco .. . 11 G 1-1 c S ID l- = o PS F 1 -c - TA 1-e. --- - - ---- .- c i-' - r / / 1 1 2'' VLF ?W 00r t Co'•12 ?)% r • • i i ' , ; 1 [ Ili/ .. 1 A -- - - - -- 40-Y o I a024- 1.Ar.soo3(. - ( E`/ S llAQU e- .61-2.1•1 et Lb - W = 11205* 1b+ 2.5)00) = 2c-)6 pi-r' NA -. w AZ/ 3 - Col 2_ 11.3 -v_. -F 24Oo? I G = 222 tr1. x 1.15 60 Ow V - vi j 2 r 5100 (..5 f,, = ICoS A, = .3 x 1.15 7w 01._) i c% ? )Ilo x 9 DL v 12' -PL F Ap S tSS t. 5 „1� %,,,/ i EP Z ° k J � -1)41. (VII /IZ/(�tQo�`� 4 1 ..) N61. - I, 90ri L1tis7 3CA(l • 66.(0)(24 -12) it L. (I2 p 4— c-NI-+a t:tz oul Jo t - 2 "N.A., • `eapLAG�. U ILA W I fi /ass u P 7 4E 1 977/) gaG1NZ� ' - 30 1 it ° 31(5 x 2 g - c�-A e„ Iw4N�Jt3 24\ ' - v,... m �J - - A w : f.- . •0 >: S.DFf I T s -o ;- 1 -,„,,A,,..16, -P� ► D Z__ � � p C. ut 9:1 • A SI M p r I-13 Go p 0 ,� l.► t2.0i-)A.1 � B. ot� F $0 16 TS To ra. I.-P.� . • C. lai.-- L 'L 2 ‘1 C c Je- l- '-T)!r•)L.7 0 ‹:.1:-:-.1 )- 7 y'7 - 1 �1�1S.7�1 BY _ IY - ) 1 Si 1r) I _ . k":;?(.ac(3)1 \7 (V et: '( CA e:1C r 1 Y ) DATE C. )i - - MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. P � `'i �3 I CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION SHT. 6 OF 4 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P.O. BOX 69039 MAAUiG IN -" _ PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 -0039 • (503) 224 -9560 • FAX (503) 228 -1285 pt KEN ALL RI GHTS Er RESc WlED CORPOPAtED I ■ 1 . . ......• . /- if:":,- ., . - , . ::.,., ,., ., : / \ •,... •..• •...•... • • J• 'y I •. .. TIMOCH . '.'"? "•. PRODUCTS INSPECTION DATE: June 10, 1997 CLIENT: Mercury Development Attn: Steve Burg and .Jeff 9 Zlmel 7140 S.W. Fir Loop, Suite 100 Tigard, Oregon 97224 TP INSPECTOR: Casey Dean DATE OF INSPECTION: June 10, 1997 LOCATION OF INSPECTION: Howards on Scholls - 12220 S.W. Scholls Ferry Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 MATERIAL AND SPECIFICATIONS: 2 x 8 and 2 x 10 S -Grn Douglas Fir compared to No. 2 Structural Joists and Planks Para. 123 -C WCLB Rules Glu -Lam Beams, checked for delamination and unsound wood only DESCRIPTION OF INSPECTION: TP was asked to review the structural components used in the East portion of the outside superstructure of the building and report findings. INSPEcTIQf'( 013)ECTiY_j Please note that the following qualification is essential to Onc interpretation of this inspection report; DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE INSPECTED MEMBERS WERE IN PLACE IN A STRUCTURE, MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO SEE ALL FACES AND BOTH ENDS OF EACH MEMBER, THIS REPORT, THEREFORE, DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CERTIFICATION OF GRADE OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN DESCRIBED, NOR DOES IT PERTAIN TO ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE REFERENCED STRUCTURE. THE ONLY OBJECTIVE OF THIS INSPECTION WAS TO MAKE THE BEST POSSIBLE OBSERVAI IONS - UNDEfi THE CIRCUMSTANCES - COMPARING THE VISIBLE WOOD MEMBERS TO DEFINED GRADE CATEGORIES, IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY THOSE PIECES NON - CONFORMING TO SAID GRADE CATEGORIES. Most members could be viewed two sides and one edge, some could only be viewed one side end one edge. The E;lu -Lams could be viewed approximately 25 %. P.O. Flax 919 • 1641 Sidman Road • Conyers, Georgia 30207 • 770422.8000 • FAX: 770/922.1290 P.O. Box 50678 • 6600 N.E. 70th Court, Suite A•5 • Portland, Oregon 97238 • S03/254.0704 • FAX: 503/252.9267 Niql • . • / �_. • \ Mercury Development . Page 2 MATERIAL INSPECTED: Upper Roof Joists Two(2) 2x10 -3to Four (4) 2 x 10 - 16 to 20' Eleven (1 1) 2 x 10 - 12 to 15' Twenty -seven (2 /) 2 x 10 - 16 Six(6) 2x8 -3to 16' • Lower Roof Joists Two(2) 2x8- 12to13' Forty -nine (49) 2 x 8 - 14' Face boards attached to Glu Lams Six (6) 2 x 8 for 69 lineal feet INSPECTION RESULTS: • One (1) 2 x 10 - 16' Upper roof joist member The twenty fourth full 16' length member from the South end Northward exhibited an oversize knot. One (1) 2 x 8 -14' Lower roof joist member The fifth full 14' length member from the South end Northward exhibited a split. One (1) 2 x 8 -14' Lower roof joist member The seventh full 14' length member from the South end Northward exhibited a break. One (1) 2 x 8 -14' Lower joist member The twentieth full 14' length mornber from the South end Northward exhibited an oversize edge knot. One (1) 2 x 8 • 14' Lower roof joist member `) f he forty -tirst full 14' length member from the South end Northward exhibited a saw cut. All of the above described five (5) members exhibited characteristics that would exclude them from the grade of No. 2 Structural Joists and Planks. Each piece was identified with an "X" In red lumber crayon at the location of the characteristic observed and marked "X" on the brick wall at the rncrrrber location. None of the remaining one hundred -two (102) members inspected exhibited characteristics that would exclude them from the grade of No. 2 Structural Joists and . Planks. None of the Glu Lams exhibited any delamination or unsound wood. All par tics were • aware that one (1) Glu - l.nrn exhibited a failure. 1 N � I r �._\ Mercury Development Palo 3 COMMENTS: Many of the members had seen occasional moisture, however they only exhibited water stain at this tirne. Sub . ed by, .&/0"&- - / Casey D n Director of Wostern Operations xc: File V`i 1 7 .