Correspondence H
May 17, 2005 :'1
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
Ankrom Masan Architects
David Vonada
6720 SW Macadam #100
Portland, OR 97225
RE: REVIEW- ADDITION /ALTERATION
Project Information
Building Permit: BUP2005 -00162 Occupancy Type: B
Tenant Name: McCormack Building Construction Type: V -B
Address: 7190 SW Sandburg st. #10 Occupant Load: 51 +
Area: 6428 +/- sf Stories: 1 + Basement
The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 2004
edition; and 2003 International Fire Code as amended by TVF &R. The submitted plans are
approved subject to the following conditions.
1. Manually operated flush bolts or surface bolts are not permitted. 1008.1.8.4 OSSC
2. Exits and exit access doors shall be marked by an approved exit sign readily visible from any
direction of egress travel. Access to exits shall be marked by readily visible exit signs in
cases where the exit or the path of egress travel is not immediately visible to the occupants.
Exit sign placement shall be such that no point in an exit access corridor is more than 100
feet (30 480 mm) or the listed viewing distance for the sign, whichever is less, from the
nearest visible exit sign. 1011.1 OSSC
3. Where all means of egress are accessible, directional signs shall be provided at
nonaccessible exits to indicate the route to the nearest accessible exit. 1107.5 OSSC
• 3. Exit signs shall be illuminated at all times and shall be provided with a second source of
power that will provide 1 'h hours of illumination in case of primary power loss. 1006.3
OSSC FYI Additional exit signs may be required by the city field inspector to clearly
indicate the path of egress.
4. The means of egress shall be provided with illumination of not less than 1 foot candle at the
floor level anytime the building is occupied. The means of egress illumination shall be
provided with a second source of power in case of primary power loss. 1006.2 OSSC
5. Glass masonry shall comply with the provisions of Section 2110 or with the requirements of
Chapter 7 of ACI 530 /ASCE 5/TMS 402. (OSSC 2101.2.5) The width of curved panels
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772
6. Glass masonry shall comply with the provisions of Section 2110 or with the requirements of
Chapter 7 of ACI 530 /ASCE 5/TMS 402. (OSSC 2101.2.5) The width of curved panels
shall conform to the requirements of Sections 2110.3.1, 2110.3.2 and 2110.3.3, except
additional structural supports shall be provided at locations where a curved section joins a
straight section, and at inflection points in multicurved walls. OSSC 2110.3.5
7. Mortar for use in masonry construction shall conform to ASTM C 270 and shall
conform to the proportion specifications of Table 2103.7(1) or the property specifications of
Table 2103.7(2). Type S or N mortar shall be used for glass unit masonry. The amount of
Water used in mortar for glass unit masonry shall be adjusted to account for the lack of
absorption. Retempering of mortar for glass unit masonry shall not be permitted after initial
set. Unused mortar shall be discarded within 21/2 hours after initial mixing except that unused
mortar for glass unit masonry shall be discarded within 11/2 hours after initial mixing.
OSSC 2103.7
8. Glass units shall be placed so head and bed joints are filled solidly. Mortar shall not be
furrowed. Unless otherwise required, head and bed joints of glass
unit masonry shall be 1/. inch (6.4 mm) thick, except that vertical joint thickness of radial
panels shall not be less than 1/6 inch (3.2 mm). The bed joint thickness tolerance shall be
minus 1/16 inch and plus 1/a inch. The head joint thickness tolerance shall be plus or minus 1/g
inch. OSSC 2104.1.2.4
9. Glass unit masonry panels shall have horizontal joint reinforcement spaced not more than 16
inches (406 mm) on center, located in the mortar bed joint, and extending the entire length
of the panel but not across expansion joints. Longitudinal wires shall be lapped a minimum
of 6 inches (152 mm) at splices. Joint reinforcement shall be placed in the bed joint
immediately below and above openings in the panel. The reinforcement shall have not
less than two parallel longitudinal wires of size W1.7 (MW11), and have welded cross wires
of size W1.7 (MW11). OSSC 2110.7
10. Deferred submittals such as Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinkler, Truss Joist Shop Drawings, etc, will
be charged a deferred submittal fee based on the valuation of the portion of the work being
deferred. The minimum fee shall be $200.00.
11. American with Disabilities Act (ADA): It shall be the responsibility of the Architect,
Engineer, Designer, Contractor, Owner and Lessee to research the applicability of the ADA
requirements for the structure. The City of Tigard reviews the plans and inspects the
structure only for compliance with Chapter 11 of the OSSC, which may not include all of the
requirements of the ADA.
12. Live Loads Posted: The live loads for which each floor has been designed to exceed 50 psf
shall be conspicuously posted by the owner in that part of each story in which they apply,
using durable metal signs, and it shall be unlawful to remove or deface such notices. The
occupant of the building shall be responsible for keeping the actual load below the allowable
limits. 1603.3 OSSC
13. Safety glazing including but not limited to: the following locations: Each unit of glazing
shall be permanently identified by the manufacturer. 2406 OSSC. Some of these locations
are as follows:
a. Glazing in ingress and means of egress doors.
b. Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel adjacent to a door where the nearest
vertical edge is within a 24" arc of the door in a closed position and whose bottom
edge is less than 60" above the floor or walking surface except when there is an
intervening wall or other permanent barrier between the door and the glazing.
c. Glazing that meets all the following conditions: In lieu of safety glazing, protective
bar (1 ' /z" height minimum) may be installed on the accessible side(s) of the glazing
36" ± 2" above the floor. The bar shall be capable of withstanding a horizontal load of
50 plf without contacting the glass. Sec. 308.4
Approved Plans: 1 set of approved plans, bearing the City of Tigard approval stamp, shall be
maintained on the jobsite. The plans shall be available to the Building Division inspectors
throughout all phases of construction. 106.3.1 OSSC
Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided for all new buildings
in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property.
When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed
City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in
tracking and processing the documents.
Resp
al He el,
Senior Plans Examiner
L
•
Val Henzel - McCormack Office Building Page 1
From: <DaveV@AMAA.com>
To: <val@ci.tigard.or.us >
Date: 5/10/2005 5:21:10 PM
Subject: McCormack Office Building
Val:
I recently faxed to you our latest proposed solution for the exit way thru
the warehouse portion of the McCormack Office Building. I believe this
should be acceptable to you, based on our recent conversations.
Another question:
Bill is seriously considering enlarging the office space into the warehouse
as I showed you on an earlier sketch. How long of a delay would this change
add to you review time? Would it be better, as I suspect, to submit it as a
permit revision, once we have the permit?
Thank you again for you help,
David Vonada
Principal, Ankrom Moisan Architects
CC: <BMcCormack @pmpjv.com >, <stewarta @AMAA.com>
)A1/
941k -\1‘
S
65$6 q
huda/ryntirp ��� �\
24446 May 2, 2005
CITY OF TIGARD
C
OREGON
Ankrom Masan Architects
David Vonada
6720 SW Macadam #100
Portland, OR 97225
RE: REVIEW- ADDITION /ALTERATION
Project Information
Building Permit: BUP2005 -00162 Occupancy Type: B/S 1
Tenant Name: McCormack Building Construction Type: V -B
Address: 9000 SW Duram Rd. #10 Occupant Load: 98
Area: B -5471 sf, S1 -3118 sf Stories: 1 + Basement
The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 2004
edition; and 2003 International Fire Code as amended by TVF &R. The submitted plans are
approved subject to the following conditions.
1. You have submitted a 1/3 diagonal distance for your required exits(46 feet). There is no
sprinkler system proposed or rated separation to allow this distance. You have proposed to
egress through the storage room as an alternant to meet this '/2 diagonal requirement (70 feet
required). The proposal submitted shows around 96 feet travel with floor striping and
bollards spaced 10 to 12 feet plus as the required route.
This does not meet section 1013.2 as a discernible path of egress. The distance would be
okay provided the path is permanent in nature like railing, walls etc. Therefore, the
requirement has not been met.
2. The submitted document shows an addition of a restroom. If this is a change in the submitted
plans please provide this information.
Please provide information showing how you plan to meet the 2 exit requirement.
When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed
City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in
tracking and processing the documents.
Respect
Va Henz , Senior lans Examiner
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772
&A.-L/ 0?5 -cro / (p Z
RECEIVED
March 29, 2005
At'K o a 2005
CITY OF TIGARD
McCormack Properties, LP
Attn: Bill McCormack
7190 SW Sandburg Street
Tigard, OR 97223 BUILDING DIVIS7
Dear Mr. McCormack:
This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modification (MMD2005- 00005) approval to
construct a 1,413 square fpot addition to the existing Perlo McCormack Pacific Office Building
located at 13730 SW 72" Avenue, WCTM 25101 DC, Tax Lot 03800 in the City of Tigard,
Oregon.
The Tigard Community Development Code, Site Development Review Section, states; "if the
requested modification meets any of the major modification criteria, that the request shall be
reviewed as a new Site Development Review application."
Section 18.330.020.B.2 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has
resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed:
1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development.
The proposal does not involve residential property. Therefore, this standard does not
apply.
2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is
not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development.
3. A change that requires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter
18.765. Additional on -site parking is not required as a result of this proposal. Based on
the use associated with the subject site (office), the total number of required parking
stalls for the site including the proposed addition is 42. There are a total of 89 parking
stalls, all of which are located on -site. Therefore, this standard has been met.
4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the
Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the build is
proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable.
5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The building
height will not be increased as a result of this proposal.
6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off -site
traffic would be affected. This request will not require a change in accessways or
parking areas where off -site traffic would be affected. Therefore, this criterion does not
apply.
7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be
expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. This modifih ation will not generate more
than 100 additional vehicle trips per day according to the 5 edition of the ITE Handbook.
Therefore, this criterion does not apply.
8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non - residential use by more than ten
percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The proposed expansion is
1,413 square feet. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Page 1 of 2
9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open
space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code
or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. The modification will not
drop the site's landscaping percentage by more than ten percent. Currently, there is
17,382 square feet. A ten percent reduction would be 15,644 square feet. The
proposed modification will reduce the landscaping to 15,974 square feet, which is a nine
percent reduction. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or,
• landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more
than ten percent where specified in the site plan. The change of use will not reduce
project amenities.
11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review
approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. Staff conducted
a search of City records and found no orig land -use approval associated with this
property. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH
YOUR PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee
has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote
the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding
properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable
local, state, and federal laws.
If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at
(563) 639 -4171, ext. 2437.
Sincerely, V
Mathew Scheidegger
Associate Planner
I:\curpin\mathew minmod\mmd2005- 00005.dec. V !
c: M M D2005 -00005
Page 2 of 2