Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
MLP 5-78
• I J,: F r '"r� 400 JOHN SKOURTES • a Minor Land Partition (MLP 5-78) + : 73rd Bonita Road ` • • 0 • • • • lat • • • • n , I ,,,. k' 0,, , , „, r GIZARIN, LANDIS & AE131 . LAWYP:RS n1c)u / 4. 1,,t5t6 GEORGIA-PACIFIC BLVLDIfiG ' rORTLAND, OREGON C31720,4 7F.:LEPHONE 1503122A-653a JOHN CORDON GEARIN, f----) DAVID C.LANDIS FRED M.AEDI , ,) 5:7 t u . JOE D.ISAILEY I i / ,JEFFREY M.BATCHELOR FRAN), A.moscATa I 1 g/ JOHN M.P I ERCER October 16 , 1979 •, • JAMES M.CALLAJAIAN Pt Da id Denecke, Esq, . 12800 SW Canyon Road ' Beaverton: OR 97005 • Re: City of Tigard Roadway Vacation Our file: 12, 836-51 d Dear Dave: . Things have changed somewhat since our last conversation about this project. We have been forced to . . concede that the former vacation proceeding was defective . because ro lacked the consent of one of the abutting owners. — I have moeuraged the city council to proceed to call a hearing on the vacation of the whole strip, clear down to ..-.. _. the ilt.mrsection of this unopened ri9ht-of-way with Fanno Creek Place, and back of the Beebe Company property, but the council has tabled a resol'ation calling that public hearing to try to encourage the parties to work the problem ou.',. peacefully. . , Harvey King is represented by Robert Scherzer, who i8 with Wheelock, NiehanE., Hanna, Murphy, green & Osrka, Suite 700# Benjamin Franklin Plaza, Portland, OR 97258. His telephone number is 224-5930. I have not been in touch with Mr. Schetzer recently, and I am not confident that he 4 is current on ovir recent difficulties with this vacation. I just haven't had time to keep him informed, and particulary . . . r ' in view of Mr. King' s absence, I probably should have been q doing that. , Mr. Skourtes is represented by Ted Miller, at McCormick & Reynolds, 7th Floor, Standard Plaza, Port:land, . Y OR 97204. I believe Mr. Dieter is a:, Jo represented by mr. Miller, but I can't be sure about that. He nas been at our last two city counci'. meetings and is very curren'i.. on , the situation. '.' At our council meetinq last night our planning director volunteered to contact all of the interested parties and see whether there is a realistic prospect of a private 1 III a y�, David Denecke, Esc . October 16 , 1979 Page resolution of the problem. The alternative, of course, is to have a public hearing in Decemb:r or January and make the city council decide. 4 I would not like to see anybody pay an unreasonable P. price for any of the rights involved here, but of course the city would be extremely happy if a private resolution does result in this situation. I don't know how ir.,olved. I will m, be, but if you think that there is anything I can do that would be helpful please let me know. Very truly Fours, ,:. Joe D. Bailey JUR:pb IIIcc: Mr. Aldie Howard Robert Scherzer, Esq. ill III IIIr. M. fir. QT .. ., ,cmrn+rvx.0+A+wxrxx mmi.w.w. .*.ry it <r 4.:..,«... nvm.w..«.0-. .. ,..:.- :: ., _ »., µ_ • I.. • I 42.....- • . , s.-' ,-, , , GEAFRIN, LANPIS & Aa-E31 LAWYERS 10)0_,• 1516 GEORG1A.-PACIFIC BUILDING (-;'-'3 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 I. TELEPHONE(503)224-6532 f\f) L' • . JOHN tOROON LIEARIN 1:)\1V-\ DAVID C.LANDIS • FRED M.AEBt JOE D.DAILEY , JEFFREY M.BATCHELOR '. FRANK A.MOSCAT 0 JOHN C.mERCER July 27, 1979 0.,,,,,,cs M.CALLAHAN 1 A Office of the County Counsel , , 4 ,,t, • lif Washington County Courthouse p Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Re: Washington County Minor Land Partitioning Procedures _ Our file: 12,836 - 0 Gentlemen: ' A . , I represent the City of Tigard as its city , r attorney. We presently have pending before our City Council '"' a petition for the vacation of a public road. At one end of the road is a piece of property designated on Washington i. . County Tax Map 2S1 12A, Tax Lot 4001. It is contended that r 1 ,: the vacation of the road in question would leave that property • without access, and that theref-lre the vacation cannot be 4 accomplished. . - , . . The City of Tigard has a minor land 2artitioning ' ordinance which requires that the owner of property sure . - the approval of the city before partitioning a lot. Our P records indicate that there was no minor land partition proceeding in connection with the creation of gax Lot 4001. It is our information that 11.on VPS2128 the owner of Tax . Lot.A.211.0, out of which he claims to have cut Tax Lot 4001, iattempted tr) transfei the property to a man rmara-brz in August or Septembe: of 1978. As I say, we have no record of a minor land partition proceeding in connection with this transfer. We were told, however, that tM county had • approved the creation of Tax Lot 4001 purL'uAnt to provisions of the county' s ordinances having to do with minor land partitions. I believe that this assertion is incorrect, and I am writing you for the purpose of eliciting a written response confirming this belief. I have been told by a representative of your planning A.,,,partm.mt that the county still has no minor land partition ordinance and, furthermore, that the propity in question ls within the City of Tigard. Can you confirm for me in a brief letter that you have no minor land partition ordinance, and that, even if you did have one, you would not be using it in connection with the partitioning ,cp property within the city limits of the City of Tigard? 6"h ' it a � Office of the County Counsel Washington County Courthouse 3uly 27, 1979 Page rp This will seem to you to be an unnecessary piece of work. I assure you that our experience with this property and with this particular problem relating to this property make it clear to us that even the most obvious sorts of determinations must be reduced to writing, as we can expect that almost any aspect of our handling of the development of this proper 1.y may be litigated. Thank you very much for your help. Very truly yours, Joe D. Bailey JDB:pb cc: i 1Yi . Aldie Howard P lanninct Director 4 , .,,/^"... .,-..sui.sv'!.�*,+rshs:spnwnm-...iaH«ve..r^."I;.w..«v. w.o.«,. � ..-.rn.. .,.F .,. '"' -«.+.-=•..�..tr. a^, � o "yi, William Dieter ��,--- 10365 S. W. Heather Lan - /// Beaverton, Oregon. �� � � 97005 1;? ' • f .44.407/ trPo 494 July 18, 19L City Council City or Tigard Main Stree' Tigard, Oregon 97223 SUBJECT: Remonstate against vacation of 30 foot wide ded;cated pnb'.ic right of way - Fanno Creek Acre Tracts Gentlemen: o . • am the recorded owner of the land tax lot 4001, fronting on a 30 foot public roadway, The vacation petition as submitted by private citizen Harvey King is defective per Oregon revised statues. Therefore, it cannot be ac-bed upon by the Tigard City Councils ORS 271.020 states) "no vacation on a part of a public right '7 .� any p p g of way shall occur". Even when "all or part thereof of the right of way has not been opened or used by the public for 20 years , if the n on consenting owner has no other pane access to -his. property. In othei words, no vacation of a public right of way can occur which would ca11minate public access to a parcel of, land. We have not consented to the vacation of this public road, because this vacation would land-lo k our property, The state law as enumerated abt ve is crystal clear. Any rrther conditions, Opini=a or circumstances that might be used by the pet,Ltioner° Mr. Harvey King 1 'AL for this vacati,Mtin are irrelevant and out of order. Sincerely yours, WILLIAM DZFTE • ).. 4, C''' • :. , ' I , . ' r . , 4,..,„;,--- , 0.0 •...., , . , . ........--....-. . . . , , . . . .1 . . / . . . ,...-,----....,,,, . . ,./."-'-....*:-1,....-",/,,..,.‘0')A----7.**I''-ie. "-. 1 ' /:''''7 ' , ,,,,<:..,ez-,'"4' .• ' , 1 . . . ,---- ,iti./ . H,,,• .. . . . . •fr , . � A • S4-,pterober 2 , :078 Mr. John Skourtes Preeident • Uational aft Company Zoo. . Route 1p b751i 004mIxtomi0 ott 97005 teat Or. Skourt.dv Thia lottor lo to 'make mom oloax the neoe2sary cMiaps that y will need to follow to address the conditions that, the Cltv Council placed on approval of your requeat for a Miilor Lana Partition (H/P 5.,78) Monita Road Warehoue$ Vroject) Those stepo ano as tollowsa 1, Washington Conntir inques acleas permit. 2. Wasington County granto ,porml„osion for roads to be vidoned to oolleotor ,svAnklards as per C,141.1 Counoil oondition gov gsantim 4nor Land Oartitiov,. 30 Washinvton Couaty (t road authority) mabsxi application to the P.U. , f:or a twar4ng to adluot and/or roinstall t croaming • :4oty qguiAment in order t viden aonita Road to collootor 41a4da. • 4. Ikrter th' $loers portrat heal bean vranted by Ihitaatinston County anki rovitti S 1.04 ht q ,o40‘,.n obtaiDed from this fqx ths afti tratutelato 0,,;) the orosoing amiToty otcpaistreat" a raeta,rin.ij iU bo sectkadtal.ed with the Dosloan iit7or th..* reatow .thq site! kattn,, Xf dor4 have dagfavtaty obtaiazing the neaegmax'l pemit. Zram wanhiultom Coanty or tho utiilty commiesionl yma Amy lawh to az% t,Sltv Cit COUnCil to aonsidertuOting An adjustmoat to tho uonditiunu 14 that wore stipuloted. Sinctuoly0 7 tuunom TA. WhAVBR • Planninit Din114tor .1) g.1.4fildb F' 54 tr, ,s6,/eith, 'V'0. 1 0 «' 14'.? .A, .111- CITY OF TIG , • P.O. Box 23397 12420 S.W. Main, Tigard, Oregon 97223 September 13, 1978 National SafPty ,Company, Inc. Route 1, Box 575H Beaverton, Oregon 97005 • ATTr. Mr, John Skourtes . Be: Appeal - •MLP '5-78 Bonita Road Warehouse Project Dear Mr. Skourtes: The Tigard. City Council, at their regular meeting of September 11, 1978, voted to uphold the appeal of the above mentioned matter with the following conditions: . • 1. That the approach or access to Bonita be filled to an adequate height. , . 2. That BonitP, be widened and improved at applicant's expense to provide adequate width and an appropriate access apron. 3. That an access permit be obtained from Washington County and the Public Unity Commissioner for an adequate method of access and egress. 4. That P.U.C. permission be obtained for any adjustment to thi crossing-guardrails to provide appropriate access. 1 5.) That the parcel be submitted to the Site Design Review Board for approval of the site layout before any building permits are issued. 6. That provision be made that additional rght-of-way be dedit,ated for the necessary footage along the width of the pLoperty to bring V.mita Road to collector street stariards for future widening. The full $100.00 which was deposited with the City for costs incurred during the appeal process has been spent in Ole following manner Transcription Of Testimony - $86.00 and Public Notice Advertising - $14.00. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me or the Planning Department. Sincerely, jr\ r tj 6 %reen Wilson III iw Recorder pro-tem CC: E.G. Edwards, Supt. Burlington Northern Railroad C.T. Babers, Supt. Southern Pacific Railroad Jerome Morris, Washington County Public Works Dept. Roger Campbell, Rail Rate St Service Division, Public Utility Commissiou Fred Anderson, Attorney John Ragman, City Engineer Ed Walden, City Building Official Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 9-13-78 John Skaurtes j ' NOTE: The following must be received by the City of Tigard within fourte..>.z (14) days of your receipt of this letter. Failure to return this ackno.iledg,nn:rit may resdlt in action by the City of Ti(zard. I hereby acknowledge this letter documening the action of The Tig_rd City Council. I have received and read this letter and I agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms artd/c•r conditions attached. bignature Date r n 6 V.. cnn 1 ` N, 1. . A I r �. ''IK.negwmaz,. auw..,.w-.,w, �,.., vwys Rt +a--a•wwwrnm.nn' ..Il�:..`-.e.•1...., „,+.... .. .. ......... �, W... .. 1 .1,.. . . ' . , . . : . , . . , . . , • „ , : . „ ;, • ,.. . , f ...,„. ,'-:.„)........;;'.1.-::,7*,,...,:4:,-.;:j.',„'-':::;.,,,„;':;:.:....,...i•;...,,131":::-",eC= .:';... 1 -... --.--- y,, -.77' '. , ., ,!*'.,..1.7^P.":;, ol1tded by Councilman Mickel,.;w:1 t",,,,..a';:„ My r P11 . 1 ' "'Li'. P';'iPl".'",.."« to sign as recommended by Legal Counsel- • . .. ,. ' ,,' - , -;',,i7.02 voto of Council. A .1'.* ,7 ' ',„.. . 7 :!..7.::::.".. T • lt.':„ Tom Fisher $300.00 refund o Sewer Permit Ire .s., , (.,=*,,,, ,.."„t , :A1,-7, y. :;,:'...,-;m...: ,-.1.otcd i...hat Mr. FiStwx, had paid $600.00 for a sewr p :11 ,. - .. .....,, °i...:.1.: .-,.....(... LA t7.),,..4.t the correct f should have only been $30000 : "..., - - -,-s.'. e7r.lr,,t,:,,6 ?rtr)r to 1970. Approval of the refund requos wars ....,.. (c; ''. 4 -.--:::ItTal Ecn*,:%la, seconded by Councilman Cook to a2provv: . f v.,..)tr.,. of Council ? t' :' tRO1',.., '.:,' „',,,. : .. ",.:.,..4 ":•!' (.:,SRTA.: SLOE LOT EASEMENTS TN LAKE TERRACE SUBDT!71 ;r2N - ,,, A. 7,, ,,i.,-, ...A ':,,,.: ..? .: ,7,"',..,P.,,;;,b :-1 , . . . , :, C: ifF. ti,'..)1.1 ,..)f the side 1 .. . . ; •,', ''!, '`,"'" :" *.'," '',.1 1,3P i .".*:,1,, ,". .7., ,,..1 .1.,').'';'.1.ti ti.011. I NO 6 ''.."6) 'vvrE.1 s 6ran 1...c.T d . . 0 . I!' .:‘,..:,, .„' ,,, i'•:,..:1.!.17 r..'..).,,. .44.,'.•;..,.. ,, ....:?..L.; !il.. -,w ,'z 17. . .. , . • ,.. ,.:\,.. , . . ;e".i !''' ,'1.' . ",:,.,..•,., .',1 '' 'V, . . . /. c.A.-' ..1.,.7''' .:,',',...,.1 ,o4 ' 74 .. ..„ ,. • ;',i.- !.:,,,,, '):,',....,..,, ..-4.c(14' Tr, .,.. ., . ',.i . , . ',—, ' ,)-'. _.A, (,4.,9Y.ALNCE VAGATIO3 CERTAIN tl:DL 1(..,j' i..1:11:..-..-Arfr.'., IN LAKE 1 • :BDIVISTON, CITY 017.' T!..6APD, WASH3N.'.'.1,TCN COUNTY, . , 0 . , ,i(', t , , ',* ,.';$'.I,• , .1.,r,..i,, 1.,,'t,,,,IA., 9:.,;4.,,,.)...,,Ji c ri by (.c,.)L',..n.c.1.I":i',!an 3171 .. : .., 1 ir.',"4'-',.'..Y.) '„; -,c.',.4.-.' OIF 42,0VOGil • , , JO .?1•,,,On.i' -.;., Como is-,'.t.oi,,L dc,0, ,,,,,1 id a ,'::‘,.q,..!(,,..,,, 1.)7 John $1‹.u IA r ',' ' ' : . i. 1 • ' '' - '''; !,. ' .4';',. .1-:.. ),r,'' 1.' : 'I'4.,,,,,,,'.A,',...ci ,P h a'1,u., n,,,i, va.r'Aou.s(., at SW 73',4.:d an6 to.,....,.1 .7,.,s Road (Wash. Cu L.,' LL, -;..0 ,,,,l'ilch el'..(:.‘iSion Fitit.ii beco ai',n,,,,i4.,:,..,d 'LC, thTa Citv Col.T.c1.1 . , if 1) ) 1978 , Pan 3 . , . .. . , y • , , , 'k... 4 a ‘• Qt b , O'c' ,,,,,d, � . ..". :) ' ' .F,.? ..:,4t.,_ this would he a full evidential hearing. 4" „, ,"*., '. :!'. stated facts pertainin , to M P 5-78 noting that )v I,a.1nIng ,. ' f . .. :ei.,: ,..4J, the item based on the vn.safe condition of t~h a ingress- . '' o. ., . w:,?; .:.y T quest: Jn. Planning Director also presented . \'. t. :... : , :"a,,. v,; -?A.ommenata on and pirtuie,q show,ag tbe. 7ubject site ) ' f . . .'" ^r,: e.'::S„ E:a ne ' ;Lng's memo noted that if development of the r ''. °` 'r, ."'^ • ':,,,,,n Led t :: sufficient width of pavement be added to t1'iC: existing „ ,•'' , G"' :,- <'r 14'.. ..t to .r.v,:,,:d to facilitate e st.er1y , r uri. turning movements` 4 F .r:` :' .,L .:`. •,„ .. r.': 5 ::ern i lto the west bound traffic lane and that P Yr.C 10 - i„ ... :i.J:,'t1 1:o atter the crossing r 1 1 d r 1; ... ',. ! 1 •' '',..' 1 .,, d r 1.r, 4..r.+ H . ay for National 8afe ty Company First yeques .ed !hat . .1..r,'.:. 'r,,°..t1. 'iw•:s,1 Safety Compaw% not Mr John iikour'tes wa.`t Cie (we i .. .. .. ,.," ,.. t*., -, I.e:'�5,: .:-.g COImn s3 iof denial of the MIJ •, ,' °J"r , .!. 1,.. ., '',:`'.r.t:r±ta the fC)LloWi,ng exhibits for Council' s consideration i. f , I . r '. “~1,.°'�; d..2n _r.r1-Inn the physical relat:ion.shi) of the tracks 1; t ,: ftoct:! 4.7d the site, . . . . : .'.(-c,,, I o,:,,. Washington County Department of Tax i...,on 6,1t.-.d 6 lo 8 ' i 1', property as ' sern"cate tax lot ar.0 a isiu! '7t I .. , ,.r' .:t.,,r t .' : a-tii,f.t`,ed Sewerage Agency notinF requiremt,;.nt-s for ,sewer P I . ''".J r,. '!'J.W,)1,, r '1' r t :r.a ,,',�'"l,i.C: 1''('Nair::?.ngi according to his und(r 3t,,ir,idiCirw„ a^,a4 i:rasi'.d ' • , . .. ,'r 1 , .7. 4.), of th-.a pro jec..t., Mayor Bishop rep1,. d in tha a.f firmaive. 4 , `,• ! y� y�1 r�y+ y 4 ' r . ".., ..,r I ,:1,-•r J 1'e.. lit:AI h/ (A'%∎'ri�Nt I,s.`.?1 o u Of�«i c,a .4. �',r.,,a ld d,: L,:, l":c c o 5 1 h b' .. 'y"1,, 1^. Fred T A Y� t` a °{ .`} °, nAC9 ✓ `iM�' 'i' 4 1 f x o i ►' 11 tr WTI Co ?"4?.:a c"�7'C1 l.1 y i t `,, ,. r.a .'.? om bor fire and a.2,) from .t Ira.r.:t' °y.w.,..«r!.,wc of *, v .-,-,n- ;..-.. ;I ;; rating would b e C _a:" . N I . ., 1',;, 't, uerc1 bv Wasitinil.,ton. County for dr.i.:r0T'my cont:"uction and 1 'i:: ;'a f," :.x i ` : '1.`.1 D:'od - Bout)eca PaC"..if',.c t:'C.)""..,,,cyad to National . (:'+r"1 4*.'')'rr. .:r y h Inc, , dated January 12, 1916 Appended was copy , 1 "" t ' e' . g,'wh as previous y noted dS xh'".:pit 01 of this hearing • d "«':tr,o',('.:`,e:, 1', a r.'''-e '1.)0twv !'iu Southern. D ri f is F.o1.1 road a- lessor and ,r ,t1 k»4,r„,'E N. 41.e ux as lessee, regard1,-,3 subject site doted October 1 ',y d r'•i:ry ,')-,'.ci" :14,.., do(wumeu1t', being a..gp`ilnufar.h to National Safety 1 V,'..,.`^,,,„' .0 . 1 i,« r ' :'e.'• .. 1..1.: fj iMil'..i C:t"4 1, ,, 1978 ti "Pe4 e 4 4. 1 40' . I, ' , • 4 .. y `Ar ir. nr,, ., 4., • '«Y ,, 'C:X C�::� `L'.;"r P I.4�, t e Angus «��C:.,.'q ip 1, f.ttr. Tl'i h y..; « - (.y y .;'f,.-••744.‘4,.....,',, :'1,7.µ -;3t:t!flg forth tr.ka.t ter s c on s i tl e rz,,d :)f/ r•' w� ;' , 1.on4 r• - •.', .,i,r'1'..e;.z''lyt.s ?: .''f�,: .p": of Exhi is,•1„"t's 1 thrLAu s h 9 ail d 'tri de a l',<r't:"el- (,)f." , ' . ' L. ^ „ ,, •,.,�� -',.,a,:r e tu;»• .r�. .g r'dr•,»r�s was off' n�� i$.r1*tr�:°I°e.�,cr.r !"':. Lhic, .Z=46'.,:. ' r ' . .t:",rr .'': " r`!i; V.t c al.I« `i�7`�«i:•'”,?ne s st;7 to prove. th',`3 1;0 r.�l f: , r :41t,* - I ti,l t i ' • • i • w" • f1,V , 7 Slop�" w ;C�. !t s s e d pr.",t i ty �:L?1 "»w°...ip.o c � � 1,W Y.. y E i:f : 4 ill A n fr , k' •`.1; r, y" .., t IS.I d' :1 t.t1 r 7r � « ., ' «+ •wt,. ,! .,y, i i-,',r: f r'r� y st ry T'was • ' n • ��« `:. Y�.:��;,«�.t:,.",.,�r;?� a„t7�.�2�.�:�► �•�f::T`t c�.i; .� .::YX j: �:.. � ?1''�,�7"«(r., Works b..«'��+• �i C:- rnTc'1-.a , «'".• , c• .w - J' :..:3,.. • ,c 5.,• of dr,i v c w.Py •lrid approach pl n , ., N. d. al`••a t!..ta l til , - •, . :It th y:o,�1row:�t,g r„`,ndi Lions,, :..1; ,the acer.7sr. t e raised u.9' to : ' is ' • d:.?r;i°d r,,. ) .".I di 5,."1rew4iy b placed,' as close as 'pG' s?rL'Le to t,h'.' . ' , i . , 'Y « :n,•,!•.``i'n ,1« , was r,.ot.e,d t at other Jt)CAtion's for 3."llart ",;„;T''<ie;+„ 11 all ..t , . 1 f«A,', 'm.r"'`. s,''u'4 of F.t rm:?«L' issuance, s„ Y J ' w. •' -'1 i ) ,..•;',W IK.:A:ar h Por«t:.and - noted he was r»t g i Gt Lc.'nr,,A f vi: '. r •. .. -4._ for '4!roj yct M He c L scussead a1terar1otl to c rivewa," which t` • • .• f e , ^ , s r r of Bonita Ro a at :r..1 t .r s'e C.`)"i.,o.n ti'I. ,. .*r'::1 .y.f'd Re fo1�owing e :h .bit's fox' C"o vac II,.`'M t.Mr�x�..:diw rat.• _�nr r . . ' ti • A?..,•,« ""'t', 4,;!.-:,...)-,+t«I',g v i rw of Boni.t:ct 1.3.C,a d .r ortl the. 1 t.,r;:. c r i v'' ,,r,";l t' (..‹.‘. . , ',.!:,, WC..,'t;. , F , a ' ,�',,c.«,y-, ..`r,w r'J'.�. B,,,,,i l.1..i� Road !'!":.'ai IA) ,::!.rt, ,11 i,5a•:,jti,..�' '� r P . V. • Yr I t ,:i . .,, ' r . C c. , °" . r l b'"! ,r r,7,:±± ''.. w!,' .+ 1..f7» w..Er i 5; . ' . • v 1 r. �.1, r;t,y,„.w x. � 1.7'2.0 �� a. , u �"i,� t.'�1' �w`r f .i0• c.I! E w ", . . ...;.:w« e �..1.i 3 11�.`. E,',,, ,'k„'S�r,`�"A�i,. 1 ,.+�� , p' '. 1„i,, . ,j , .r4 . ”! r , .. ai ' u. sl,„ .'id,.L.,:,-, 11.Io w,.... 61.:,:d U' t 1 wG�'..,k1 .•1•.a. ,d,.4,.,t '' &1.:', it t. r�.:'1 .�. t`'' 11 1 ? :M t ° k e1 �uc, 1 • yt g I C y r Y.yy11 1 f f {�+'11k . 1 y•- „ " f•. 1 - . A' r^'. .".1.-+ k" [-.Y. 'k..;-IM. Et1 .4,,1.1wi.Y Ira,' C.1d Y,FYI+P.''..s s�k,.4,d n b ,., 1'i....ri',.1. Q,' L.,'.�•...t,'�.�'.4•'CF P'Ii'. `, Y.' « A k t t.. � K` 'A ;c r;,a t'ii�° 1:11,E,' d.;�°d rf 40:.1 are f8�.a'":, 11;e¢ ".i d•1 �", 'A ")!. . i h r, r .. t:., .!. • . , • '4 ■ ..«,1 ' Y ' ,l '.:'w'1t'4'..t'.' .1.0;',.d Wank''CI ct'.°S..-1, o f.�.r t'•i I t.".,kw C�h;-"•6;+ .. 1:J.?'i..3,..41 �`i Y l h 1 1.I'7 0• .. 1 I r w' d' +', i s ' V. f .-r"° M.'.'(.1 1:',..q.':I,.1ti�,,f;:r: Lvv Q.,' tw'.•71 1_Yr:2.o;4] l'.,..r.`�C.!•a.. . I ., 'l 6•, .1'.0 4 re..,., .' i`Cr.t.�,k`'1• / ^. ,' •1,• K`, . ., , • ,,u i" , ,. t' 1t; r f } ,' t1 dr. ,.'.'Y..x, � ''da,>�,I;r t:d�'yl;'?t�'�1;" .t.'.' I,'J rk1'k' k x�•)':1 �. t.M ,0.y°" .i!ill�"a t.U�' 1 r d r':,, :.,. , " ' ,'P .,1 I. 4`,li (,''1 t r l.t',t Y j a r t'{ G ,. )1':717 , /iF_(1 F�'t. CwtMiA �d,,, A 1 11 '.14 1.J' 1 1 i d 11:IL �� • , ` , ,A,' :.•1,,Y: 1':A. t,1;t.. b.,: 1.444,!,-i I' E" a 1. .,t` "..,l °i 1. o` a1 L'd:. r1 e r ' 'f !' "a r{ "1 C,ai`!t.' i.i��r( 1"d r,- rh&f,..1.'L. [k..'«�' ) ! k• .'1'e:w,�' (.C.Y R•k'' ' .. �•�",i•'�t' �.I t.. +"' 7J..f: Y rr 1 , `.. 1 "?1 ,°?r,+-"k, tl 'iMt,+ , _adbv'rit1',h A'").0 °':lIrI".1V^ C1L'«a` r,'td°U1 , i "iL,ri:l.tOr , ,, •td "1,9;: , k°rt t"�, 4^u'� " �.4,,r u oil d,.1,1 r l, 1't?wf, 'bh'^,+ fr,", , ir:-) !.1.,t'.. ,',ad 6k:»t,.woen d • • I 1., ..' ," t't S I i•1 S: 1 £.1'.. :a t;,f'. r e"„, ••n t., T q J { . • Gti�itl%.' 1 r r - '' " .',1 '''+ ,•.eM)i''f..1E `1B, la1 ? .�, , .1!«J J b k, -. ,t.'r�tl., k• ''�I q ' � '. a .. .,. .. h +. • , ' r. i. . ter«« .r.._r .�.�.F..��,. II ', ; .,, `�� P', ..)- ..-,„ a„ :,. �.�:.��:.�°, Council and staff proceeded to question and discU,s; matt:F.,r (c- • '•.,..,' •. .,"'.1,,: 7..cti, d, possible access was available further down;' through 4:�• `. .. .'I r!,;, ' y _co o t�Y'th Avenue, ,. 0 g, !,.,, 1 ,.,T.. sti-d 1 a'r r iica t.r,o:i from Proporyent.a regarding what l '.nd was t'.- A 9 .g y'_ar 4 ,Y' 1"'%41 .ri. ea.is'44.-Thert t i. . _ .�„ . . 'q•,. que; 'bons whether County had jurisdiction of Bonita Road ly ;t,. e's...0 ,,,, , ! .: , ',, ; :, City fee t. .'.aiiroads had jurisdiction. w •, , .' _ ,"■161,:, '-. Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District noted drivewai . :s, - . r." . , %A'1,. 1 t,r poses. lrrivel...ay needed 'to be 30 feet i. ,"..tith with (, ., ° , . Y t.,,,t;',,m i'`:r ded that due to the poor access ss and egre,,,s from th'.. ',, ' .., .,' ' .2/ Ole applicant, that the 111I P be only approved w a th the y yy V r : ,. i'2,.--... ‘ak�,)..;:, .'1". ur access to Bonita be filled to an ad(.!quate height. ,, y. ` ''' N;.At t,-, widened and improvre.', at applicant 's eu�pense lo provide k d," , 1.,,I.",r4, aarc1 an appropriate acoo ep;.on. , .• %:c ci,,, he molt he ob t:a ii,P e1 from Washington County and the 1 M . Utility Corrrm,:sai.one;: for an adequate method of access and o '' #". , ;, „ii,, '., 1 �:'�l.iss?o' . 'he obtained tor any adjustment to t rot �I -'.,°-r,",u tdrai1s to provide. appropriete access. ' z; .,, . . 4:.., parY,. 1 be submitted to the Site Design Review Board fur .,1,,. . , a l_ of f '1'1,e ��:�t..t;,e layout before any hu�i,l.d ,:ig p'i rT t,°. '3C'e i''�sued e , f,#- ,, t.•!:, ,' .. l ' W ,% l, .,,:. t eg1,rf'.•'.s L'e°d Ch:±.<''1" of Police e ' is _u:,`;,, 1.",,1,i C, r.,:omm:..ndat d.on °,,,,, Gv'a le b !,, .; , r,°".u.'G,-,∎,ted it! pa' ke ts n • '• + kn r '' Po ' . w=, ri r,inu. eo hazards at access to property rir'ti noted that sight W .r ,: ','.A ? ', IA,, or ,. d,, Also noted more space , ,: 1r d to be neEded. in 1 . , kE r . d :tr ,;- r For turning movements of v•hxr„1esn 1. " , 1 v ;,1'i +:u° x'3.,'.5 1 bttw.,:e'n Count" il .'.taf " `.1.9 ro t rt't C it i 1 m ± • I r Pli rt1 ,4 :4 it i h, uob'td with the ±1;F.., c,o l r:tated by i't ,. ,4, 111Hy ,'.t",r an,..', ,ok'r c.ondi.t,ion #6 add that p(ov,i,.J'on he PF. de that 'z 1 1 " , 'r ,,r0'uWay be cyG'^,'dica'tedw�for pt�he ynet4 b:;w:i'y loata&e along � Lh��'' '° ±, "6' a".r'o f,,w d",i o bring `oo to Roaad to coi,.ec„:or it"+t�h'.»'.1.,I. efand'.z„0 M■ t. ' r" . 'i: �1 r� .'l ,y I WI,ro't ion seconded by Councilman M.e,l°w:;- lop •ti t••i' I.,: w,,'.t'1 5,74,,,'us ,�,-o to of Co, nc•l.1 n 1 ,,na,Th T, 1:, , r• f',NI;• Li , L,�1. I' ,,�d gyp,, r +� d n r`swbr ) 1,a;11:1:'.1.x'1'1 ON' ,k J"i �,+, '' ,4 11, PA'il'l'MH,Ek 1.1 l 978 .. Page a 3'""'" +y rw,m a 4.�.�.�.m,r..a..nu•.u..,,....,,,:.n,..,;;�:yro,a .:� Imo. ,i ✓w . h r I September 11, 1978 1 MEMORANDUM To City Administrator rem: Supt,, 'Engiaeeting Division . ti. Subject.: Skourtes Warehouse Site ® L ' Foresee problem with turning movement of' vehicles exiting said site:. Tne problem being that medium to large vehicles must neces .lrily encroach into the westerly bound traffic lane upon endeavoring to execute the only (easterly-right turn) turn movement permitted out of the ,site, in compliance with P.U.C. staff condition stipulated by letter to Mr. Skourtes dated 3-2-78 (see exhibit "A") . The existing narrow pavement width, uphill street glade, narrow shoulder width, steep shoulder embankmed£ts, close proximity of R/R protective devices, combine to make large or even medium size vehicle tinning movements thereat, a certainty to obstruct free traffic flow across Burlington Northern and Southern Pacific railroad tracks. (See Exhibit "B".) / Therefore, it is suggested that if development of the site is graned, with acces,-- 4 1+. egress unto Bonita Road from between B.N. and S,P. tracks, ,pproval be conditioned to require a si,i: ficient width of pavement be added Mo the existing pavement width of Bonita Road to facilitate easterly truck turning movem&.1 s to occur without intrusion into the west bound traffic lane . . and, further, that P.U.C. approval be obtained to alter the crossing, _ .. ',..• ,._: .. ., .'.n r,Jir Y-<,:•. .iIX1fN.yeJl{.etiC' •4tae .Y, "IY .. au m. .. .. uuy� ... ' ,. ... ,. .. � .... ..., . ,.,. � .....,•., WIJ�� x .., ..•,. .. ,.•,.. • . . . - . , ( il 't.,, ‘''' 1 , i ., /'piibliC Utility Commissioner of Oregon ,: . LABOR & INDUSTRIES BUILDING, SALEM 97310 PHONE (503) 378- 6660 March 2, 1978 ,if,/, r''''' . ccoveo Mr. John R. SkoLiY tes ' Route 1, Box 575I - �� �D Of Beaverton, OR 97005 C� '� P1 as,e refer to your letter rtr:eived March 1, 1978 , , concerning your desire to construct a driveway ' entrance to property located between the grade crossings at Bonita Road of the southern Pacific s Transportation Company and Burlington Northern, Inc. . PUC staff has no objection to the construction of said ., "' driveway e� �~ E t.. ,, `..,i ,, ,r.. ,. . ' , ''.��4 ', on tie sr t'.1.,..;r.:� - ..... a Boras.to Roacha It , our Le. ti�4\�� PP,,A1, ,.......,. +Sn....,-. ._ . "utt ���aK;w��,t,+.� �d� '�...mesm0 1 „, % "6 ' b� ,;, un•ers:-an. ing tat said sign wi. e installed before iV.,, ''*~ � �°I ,• any vehicular t.raff ic, makes use of said new roadway. Should the nature of the u • he, uxe, e ,blit Utility Carnmissioner has the • right and obligation Lo insure the safety of the • motoring public using said driveway. r, ,),\ -2---- --"ev Roger P. Cattlpb ,ll Adminisratcr Rail Rate and Service Division ra/0694 • i , (00 to , i ekxii4/6/ r ,.. 756.O4((. mrras and "shalt to resent '. ' ail' carrier fit tr►atrr ca rid h , • oa5 (�) This�c�..: ssiar}r�r.. , � the cuSt�vMer,of ahy public utiIl Y,railroad,a � crier,�. , shall o acid t ri and power of'hte pike to protect,,uCh custrthiers,arid the public generally,from uiafu t artd unreasohable exactions and r ,ctiee lsdicti � � obtain for them i-� ates�'' �' hail make use o enable r at Mk .... ... . ... r ar�d real � ra equ� � ... a ' y� }Pi5' .A ,'4: it I+ftid`'}(�j'il r(."4.5i..' 7t% F 'i:'d y+i' bra+ 41, 't 1 I , �1 (�a,.nx:� ! a 4,�afr' ,� � ��„{. �'�i�P�'�.�u �'Yd�� ` " � r r '"�'Sj4" [ } W - " h.r d'4t$".�I-31'•�G '1f r10,,L'}yl Jti s y 1. %. _71x. ,g.,..�r..• ' . 4i ,,. Y.1�}.' j�L'l� -llr.i ?,�. !�1 t ♦♦ M1'.. 1 . ,- yL a„ r Geometric Design 609 ', • �'1 ,'... n summary, it is necessary to know the following traffic elements fob,►design ,' purp. s f or various type highways: ._ ...-., "'� � _ . ,;r, �' Traffic Element 4ed "�:; i s HH ay , for Des 4 'J "; Y " Local roads a d ts ADT. Currj.., avo aily traffic (1 yLL3� Two-lane arterial h i es ADT. ,��tt.4`" ' I e } . ADT ,.a A.litl,for some future design year : � n Design hourly volume for some `„s future year(DHV) •• 7 0' 'f �`'•1+„Percentage of trucks during de- ti °ss ,n hour(T) r ' ;s • Multilane arterial ` sways AD'f. k and frecwa r ` ADT- • 1 I. j!!': DDHV Directional d` Nq,.hourly volume • � (D�)HV) ^*�.,, r ( '''''J it r Sg N.ti DESIGN VEHICLE: l` , ° ku, ; k1 r 1 °.'';g'',,, •Definition. selected motor vehicle, the weight, dimensions, and operating char- acteristi�s of which are used in highway design. For purposes of geometric design, :q' ' �'•�` the selected design vehicle should be one with dimensions and minimum turning 1 .f a;:i, radius as large as almost all vehicles in its class expected to use the highway. l ;5$q Y , '' ' �''1*vl Application. Dili n', r ` Y .,`,:i ,°f. ,� vehicle rharacteri.,lics are used to develop sight distance, . intersection design, cross section; and other geometric design criteria,,,+Six designq {` .4yr l ve idies`''are used for purposes of geometric designy one Of which is Selet V 'W"' ', n. �1.,, cdlmenstd s acid,turning characteristics,equal'td''.or greater than,those of the largest,'` t ,,,� 13vehir1es;expected:"i.n`app+,feCiable raun1ber 4'(see Table 14.3). Similar data. for vehicles I. - A. of local or regional significance may be used,to establish other design vehicles, a` `'4 z•:4�' ' s ar ;„ TABLE 14.3 ;,:1,�',‘`.''t ri - Design Vehicle Dimensions ; '-z' �''' '� Design Vehicle Dimensions in Ft Front near Overall Overall "` � 1 f;fpe Symbol Wheelbase O.,.erhang Overhang Length Width Haight i, '1 •d . _ eft ,,r";o 1 ',,"'- r tK ` , Pa!'eenger Car P 11 3 5 '11'10' '' 7 — 4 - ,,,.,, �•o�, ' Single'unit truck SU 20 4 6 ,„30,. 8.5 13,5 ;- ="ifI I. Single-W.)11.bus '' t;� 25 7 8 i' 40,`�'Ai 8,3 13.5 n l► . Semitrailer-� ---:.--_way.,... y+ t t, n. ;�xC.i t * ,d, ,•combs;cation . Ww. ,�.. KO k' M. �y.t.1 . �.I' intermediate WB-�0 13 -4-•27=40 4 6 ;ta 8,5 13,5 .:•�^-' i ,�.k>'• Semitrailer--- ;�.� combination ' •�w large: vV.��.8b! 20-l°30 50 3 2 5�1,%s r 8.5 13.5 � r e ' Semitrailer "..."""..""``"""`"'"- ., P 1 et. ���!„e^ :' � e "•��' . 1 fialltrailer Wa-60 9,7 yi-20,0+ 2 3 65 S,5 13.5 1` � �' •10 , _�.7'•• combination 9,4* -l-20}9 60 �,,,, a 'P' ' 1` , ' it 'Distance between reef wheels of front trailer and front■uheels of rear trailer, "'`r • ' +, .. •. .• ........ .... .. '1 1 ` yy � �� rl l� - e+(�P.'h1.f. 4 ij 1st, n ►. i L N Y# t Li � M r 'N k .1 "r Si.1 %.* . �.s:_ itiAln . . t7 C• ` ' 'r t4. 610 T,ns ortation and Traffic Engineering Handbook ■ 44 �M t ��,� .A.• f q� ' • the.minimum>;,ur,ning path,for.the specifi,c.design vehicile is,parr,ic�tl rly irx por,tant. i r The governing pa'Lbs` are the outer front,overhang and 1(i�he-'"inner rear wheel?The rT '4'7■∎` outer front wheel is assumed to follow a circular arc whir is the minimum tdrnirl .,/, radius as determined by the vehicle steering mechanism. \. t;/pical turning path of a ', 'WB-50 design vehicle is shown in Figure 14,2, For others, see cited reference.t s The • minimum outside and il;sidn wheel paths generally used are as follows: ,, ; ■ Design vehicle type , SU BUS WB-40 WB-50 WB-60 ,~',,. Minimum turning radius(feet) n 4 X42 --a:2 ,x'40 d ',45 X45 1Miinimum inside radius(feet)-----.i.1,5.3+-- 28,4 -'?fS,,3' .19,9....—.�,q,13,,,......-,1, .5 .....32. - '. .,t 1 W �\ r r r r,r_.+.• v. `:I..' /µ►ms — 1\ / / S �r r \, Path m'e, \ o f left t A q ! I. • .x # _ ¢ .l N, A‘‘ fron t y turnL r -- ln9 tad/ c? 'Ma . II eel ,` � �6� 'l e' ' '}`�w.�...�� ... / ✓'" \ �.♦i -'., I -.�.rti ��..��—.. �.��.....s.��}—...-� Llama . Y,,K 1' ., I fi I s ��99"' ``` 1111, � f- i. , , J \` �� Path -i-•1.� if \I overhang ',/` in Path of right_mot Y ;u it in rear whc,: 1 4 ; WB-50 design :Ain:r. ,ii semitrailer 1 ' combination ` G l II f combinatin 1W it f ...., ti ,x,111 . iv i —'I 0 5 10 15 20 25 I �' Scale in ft I a� I ry � r I I , l I 3 .Iiigtire 14,E 'i<4 inimtitri design path or ti/pleat design trttele(W13-50 design vehicle), • Y I a [Source:A u:?cy .D on Ceolneirie esrfgtt rfmural Highways(Washington,D.C.:Amyl- . can A„,:ociation of Stat,Righw'ay OfF,cials, 1965) p. 84,1 .., DESIGN DESIGNATION ON Design designation indicates the major controls for which a given highway is ' ,.'e'-i.:' designed. it is lar3ely independent of highway systems and of the highway type, The ,, following tabulation is an example of a design designation. • is A Policy on Design ref t rban,Nigltwajs and Arterial Streets(AASFITO) 1913 pp.268-276, ^ ' •-:•1.74i, .r,. .. •.... f- •;•,'..; . : 3171 : 44 e'..�,f'4••••:..,r: .I3 %'11 .. , t 77 �_,. .,.rtr, LxQ�N h,. =*:i • ,...A. ht's�t�N , .4,t it.'•.,t..- r.- A•.. .v ° "_ _ _ ... Vii :_.._ _i. _.?I�t4 ” � "' r_ -.•l F ._.._k4 7 ...•=727',t' , , :. .• 7. . ... . , . . , ,. ,. .,. . t P A ' .. ', '.'... '• ' -,4 A. 4 ,••• . .• ,....„,<.;•,-N ,.'''„ ii?. - ••, • +1,..w..i..„ , "`r :.• k .4."...! 'a,4; "9 Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handi000tk . 4104',.., 40; t i k -,k-.A., t- ,,,,,, ,....L.(.,e-v-c,,,,.- I c't 16, . , 6 ,..n t (.,-,c 1 il , •,•+,•011,,„,t,,•v- . , ,' 4 ,,,..: .....1.- TABLE 15.32 „, •• , ,* ,, AYerage Parking Duration of Cornmerqui ,. ....■ - ,t• • • '' ••' ;t44-ttir.,.r., •, ‘4,,„ Vehicles by Lund Use at Destination,P4burgh . ,/ ''''t,vI. ii -4,4,, _ c, ., --- N ' . "''. '"A t.1 + r ,„ •,,,,,, Average'Duration(min) . • .;,. "1„;.".. 4, ,7". ,t. —...„ . s" - ------ . 4 4,1 ';v i'" 1-.. '''...,., ie :. ". y ,., 4. ,,,,,,, J.eght Medium Heavy ..• • " ' *.•:..4.• ' /". Land Use '''',,Til.N1 'Truck ';ruck Truck Av.trage '.• ,'• *,•''i'l 4- . is- '-...e—— — — ..,...: ,,-. '..7 lesidential A ''i., 30 33 106 27 :• . . ,.,,, ,,, 4 lt etail '" '' ..' 6 '., 33 , 25 I36 30 • , ,.. •.-., rtg, , ,04.. / 6 '46, 35 33 37 t e.vices « ,,•, ,,,' 5 59'1':, ,„ 69 53 . ; .‘:' ..11.1.'it It ' dolesa.le ,/ •••*, " '. 0''...'‘4-:,'" ■,.',.' Manufacturirg ,d 83 ',I, 53 130 6, ,, Tratiqu,i•tatio,';' N.,„ ' . • .•. • ,lArt"It: , i utilities,L.--rimunica- ••••,,, ,, •', it,, • , 14 76 56 ''‘'? 104 •.)8 • 't ' H•A, l''' • ,.':' tion 1 '' i,,,,,, '. .Pu b I 1 o,pu.!tli ngs 4 63 3C 30 .,,, 39 Publ open space 2 68 50 ',:,,,,,,.. 51 Ai0Orts,st,.ects,and ••,, . '' • :f 4'4'.(•t • //railroad i tild 8 2 7 51 24 "'.1,--,„‘, 26 \ • :4 ',41-,,,. : Average 7 37 38 113 4N34 , ,..• •: :1 p.' ,;': . ..............................1.....611.......f.,...1.1‘,11.• ,..*****I ...,,,y. ... ,p:•• ', ' : ,tti. ;1.-• Source:Keel",....r,p,35. .' . , A,."3.1;:t iv -: ,.. -..,3.. ., • •,• .3.111k$' 7.•,; ',•• f ' , ,:b.,,--s•,.,*,. . OFF-STREET TRUCK FACILITIES af.::,„. LOCATIONS AND DESIGN , •. .. + '• ". ' : 1 4,•7,:,''''':. ' , ■ r. , .. p • ..: :I .r.$ The delivery and shipping of raw materials and finished voods are accomplished — .., ,. ••,.., - ..• ,te;4' 4 . ,,1 ,„A.. to a large c.:xtent by the use of trucks of all sizes.These trucks use the same streets for ... vo .. 'V. ..., ' ' access to tht.• industrial, retail, and other areas as do other vehicles but special provi- : sions ate required to meet the specialized needs of trucks on the site. .4. .•.;t 4.1 In general, trucks use the same entrances to a site a do employee vehicles and • ,.. . , • t other traff c. The entrances and exits must be designed to accommodate the largest • ' truck expected to visit the site, All of the United States now allow 55 ft (16.8 m) ,1 C • , ?*"' , •. .v, ,"„iii.; , ' -, • ;h 4. 1. , tractor-trailor lengths. Some states allow units of 60 and 65 ft (18.3 and 19.8 m). . gsteht or required cictot inr eddi conditions t.shirl.oPvw inBr.-151(0) ' ''l'''''W 1 i flare er er tl 1-e,eri Figure vehicle ile2leillustrates Eove i i length lei notrra5151cfet width and :,.. . • ) p. -,.,..„ 0 • . -, .' ' •,r..% parking,vehicle turning from curb late,property line set back 15 ft(4,6 nt.)from curb). , • ',f- , a •- .4 ' ''''.'0 ••Ikr;44`:, If parking is allowed at the curb on the approach.strLet, the vehicle pa it v,ill be moved . . farther from the curb and result in a decreased entrance width and flare length. 1..,djust. ' ,•• • .••:• ;• t‘i ••.t... merit Of the property line location wilt likewise change the entrance dimension,. Ease •., *, •"Ij 4 4. ':',1,■'',.1 ,, ..'.: i 014,24:14,. of waling into the -it e oily be accomplished by use of"'Y" or angle approach. This . , ''..c.• •' i'.,-7,14.:'41 may be particular.y useful fo, access to and from a one-way st•reet. , - . •" o'' '1.A.',-.4 ,'`•• 4 i -•t•• . The width of roadway req iircd.at gates is gcnerally rec„ommended.at 16 ft(4,9 m) : . .,. .i.,.,,,,, ,,,,,kicie*; • t'". ••1 ,'4,7 '; •:',• for one-way open ttion, 28 ft(.' 5 m) for two-way operation, and 34 ft (10,4 m) when ', „...,...•. ', 4 i''0.ittlz:' ' ''' ' *., '1+1* •'A'. ,...' pedestrian traffic, is itivol.-..ed., If inbound. trucks are stopped at the gate, it will be ,'‘',.r.':'..•4;, IV •;re:, ; i a, " •,•• I/ ' _ necessary to recess the gate,i so that sufficient st)r e spaet„ will be a.tillable tor one, : .• ..•.4 1 :I"q,,,, •;`,..1 r, 1.4•i•.." and preferably two trucks, without encroaching on the approach street, , .•,,,L...‘„, .f‘ ''Or ' Service roads within the property should be 24 ft (7.3 m) in width for two-way . ,,,,,..• , Ti•-•i.., I it' ) . operation. Whenever r .)sible., truck traffic should circu!ate counterclockwise because .■■...7"'•• 'f' ij., ,f' ',„ the le.fc turn is easier with larg, commercial vehicles since the driver's position is on • .. ',IL lip t".!1',..,'. ■ii: 4.,I 1'. .44" • ' ..`'!,:‘19■ ',tic'r:.'‘,`1 , ,, . '4. :••'.',iii."',', ', ,,P.I.$4,,,."1, , , k ''. it''t*Mr', ..fr:-....' i ilk!:*.4.1044),5M;Itif411,::' *''"A''. ' * ''• "* 'ipt.g$,',1' 4', ,..9t ,„,.‘..., . , ... - . • --- , . . .. . . . . ,! .1,11:4.411.^,a,::1,ril,:lt.,V,,,,fAilte:$4.141;, .01P41 ifilii .'4.,50,!4,71,''V 1,111 VINI,}1011.41:0,24 A,,4:A041r4,10)S; '01, ,4; ;,:. .,,.. 41, l,i)1,1,1', 04g*,.. .'4,N,.,,1 tt tip:.f,, r/...,1"i:,1. :..„yA ;1:,.,,,.4•1101,,,..411•4 , s-,-`• ,it,,'.'#...:;:TA', gtilaf40,,,Vr. ,OA ;i ,•,:., • s .iWf%;,;S-07,;1.4,i.% 1,.. 1, *,,iii,t0R4Vitqw,..0; . iifftV•''':.1 e„,r,...,,,,,,,.e .,.,,,,,., ,,,,,.0„1. .4a..:,'1,-At.,' °Wf '',.. Ir..' 4.: ';'.. ::'.4 il ‘,,,!irtt''" . '''''''41,:040411"'ir,L.lilitt(7.4;$14;, ,k ; Ji`.1kIligt...n.pl. , ., i,tfot „,„,... 710 1,,, "if‘"1.10,k 41 ;'''l,if ' k •fic At•,'. . 1..4 .4q9.4111, 'A`iiii.:$ ;R.''.''..- "---,V,*:ti*,:kt/;7N,r,..11**44.e.A.,,,,,,,,.,t... 1 .1,0;0,4,. ,,,,,,,V,:.i .,,,,it.i.:,..,, ,iih:Iv,,_? ••,:,,,,,,..:1.,, if. ;„;,,,,',,,,..44,,,,,,,,, i•,•,,•,t: Jii■•,,..44104.1.;1,..40,(,-,i,4.1.1,17,11,..,A, il '‘'. 1.6— ,ti7.40004.41,t...„,*Ot kLL.,r1V4''” kl.":AC)i..,,,,ti lep, ..1.000"„,44..'ht.-, 1- ,' .• t". ti(,6')'•J'; :','"i , k4..''li.iV.11:j'qit''.4t.4'11' etPr11110‘4:1411S144,44: ■r,, .. ...,A,',TIL.,:t.44,,,,,,,,,,,01,127 lipiji...;,,,i• * :::*..,eV:•-,,2, t.1'41);lit,,I,,,,i:,.-,./.,W,0,4, .0)J t,N,,:„:i,,,,,, 1,,, ,.„:„..7,4. t. A':.„,..grle.44*.rit,54§,440,,,op,-0-,..1A,04,4,c,ii,„,,N,4„410,,,11.1,w.,,,yvi•4,,,9.,,,.p.,..i.t...vii-e7k#0 is ,.. ;,.. e.' 1, iiv.tf,,,r-,,,,...,..14,-, ,ii10,414,7, 1...in&,yo „1-00.w.,,‘,,,,,,,,,,01., ,foop ,.v., Leo.'hi..., Wp' I;'7 it,,,-,. t , ..61 ., , 4, .,• &iv ) .11,"' ', ''. e,... °.. • :; ',,.M-i4A.,,,:ipi.44.,,q)p .0;,..,:tf,0:,,cp.„,,,,A,tokL,,,.'4,1 f.,,,,,, roo• ,, 11 vog hai-ti-i:•., i.,4'..4'".ff,A:IN,'" -•''' .,ii'': 't,••'.,1..),"u'..).:,., ,'::14). k..t .1,.", ,.,,t„,, ,,i4. 3,,fr ,,,,.„4„,. /6) 444#411"..•,,,t, ''''' 'JP. '.4i,; ..R.'. ;14,,,,P. ',A.....,t4;31401"''',,VA'6!,ecl ';••,e rkfl,,,041'-v„"trx Iv.ie`',,'? NO v0,..',fAitt.1/4..1,IA ts'-c .,.'s, iihr ;. ,A"iCi.i'.,, •11041.0*41*0.k.,,,,vV,., 7 , ,,,.,,,..0,440,4„431i,,,,q0;110,1‘.:1', ''.4t,''1.13,,d0g,,,it1:14.',4,',,,i.,-,,;:,..,4 el,,,ii,,,W,,,,*,:r;d1;-,,, .,,•,.,t„,•000,,,,,:4: . 1,,,,14.,9,4, •,'t,,,...,,,4,,.;„ii‘.440:',„,.,4, ,:;,..4,i,,,,,10,,,•,,„,,,,;•,,,Ith.,4"4,40.0:!Le:441414o a . , .9. r‘''''..5144*iel 4 rAjeaV 114 1, ,'•.Yrt.1-444.4.r'.:P., .le,2&‘kif",,,,401,117 14 r it,%•ttLif „MAP' -,',01,,,,*..,,A,p .,,.. ,;1„:,1,.. 941,1440.1';(1,,t-. ., ,00 4 !rekiiii,:.:',74,1 ' • ,. •]mv:**gif,41,,44444* .0,s.;p4,41-, 4+,4, .~,t,t14Je' ,1511.i.,,. 4.,-,i;,•11•W.',-filq•id Of'1 '. :t fall .E1h,..,,%,i•ii,"giirtYV.:;1,i)':'•4-'t.,,!''',..,.ta,,,,';..,; . ' 1'if' . 4,.;'..'t• 0?) 'XS.,,,I.k.'i';',4',:1"0 ' .4''''0 'ii.''• i'''''..,,C'4•74.4,1A,q..°44*A74.-AW V.'Vit,9''PI V'4010:":SA'1.10'.'4''AI.4r1 rfk;':-1,0 " . 40,4. 1 41470 ArCW037.,1.1q, greiS`1,f4',N Itic*•1',14tIt'.., ';.4'le.,41htli'LX1,%Y . • ; '4414,4ja,!lottYlV.,10`1417.A47*kn; V,'r'lj.:rfl..41; ' ',.1,1.j.:4!'ri■';',' tUtniltfg;Atd0; .',. '', ito,v.4:Aw1404-140,1,04;40,i:.%, ,,,1,4:,,i,,,,,--1.0,..igt, ',,,,,,,, ii-'!t,r'4..• 61— "*;47"p■,'Oil' ,:. , I le,,,,i'Albri.i4.,JO'4$,i,,,it.:I.,044011. 1,}144.tikt 4•41••!.i'','•I''s,-'•(•44.t.41P4V41141? 111,-ti'ttlAritPV4.41454'ier.l.':1•.4.''CiteiV::ce-,.0"to. ',s.,' ' '''''' - '''.,-I"' . ) y :,..,-;p1,-...,-.., -,,,,vi.7,4,,,-,,woitkAifio.rs..41,4:11,......i.,,f-,.;‘,,,ve-vorto-pwv4,40*.pp,A$1,:.11,,,m1,,,,,..s,„4,10.141,*..ii....,111.#f&,:,,,..,p • f .I,Y,' 'i:'i V..,it,'e, ',„.A?.', 1,11 L,,, ,, .,;,:.,,, 2,, .,4,,,,,,„ i.,z. „,..i.,,,,,yi,,,,,,,„„ ,;,,,,.;,„si„,,i,,,;,.4,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,p,,,,,,,,,.ft,„4,,..,:i.::44. , 0,.44.4.c.,;kr'gli,F.0,41,,.. , ,4.,s- ,,-1,,,,I. :,..A.-,.,...:-..0,1-,,4...!, ),Vit.04z.'.' ''V,'..-',.',*.?.V$4.1-41,..111,,,,•40,,i,,,fr„4„J,,ro„i4,04,,:1•14...4-k,i,,e.it:Arq4'.7•4,110-0,•:,-.1,,1,*, ' .,, 1,4-A4'41,r-;pia•-., 1,-..,,di'.,. ,,a1 Om 4- • 1 ' ' ' '' 1:',.''-'0,,,z,iii,'44.1144',1,"•••'"-i,;4.-.4't:AV i.i.iptly,y0.:-,,,;! .,-,,,,,,4,10....4, .4),,,,e,-:f. I ,.,t,.:. ,,._.:,....4.., . .,. ,,, ,I.,-.,),LLIT e_...._4•.:p., 4...1,....•.„:„.7 4:4,'''.4 f.,_.-It,',A4.,A.,0;!,,i4t. 0'41,4*p.1•4'r..'..14441,4', ,,5:,'4,41,447.,s;;7;44-'41..'W$10iri,fricot *1 s.14 It•••.114.1„•it...'0.4.,*:i':kiv„ ''''• 't• ' ' 4"', i, ....,'.... - • . . -'4,',1,•„1 ' tirki'',4,441,Wr ,„.4,•',14.4,44-1• ,,,.,.1,: ..„.•..1,,, 1 ,. , , , , im.(7.1 7,,,,,tii,,,.„41,,,,,,1,, ,.■ ,c,„Aii 4,--,,, 1,ti,.',.,,,fri'.r"''.'',,A.- 4." ,'' ' t.. •," i' '.. ", ; ,..si . ,. ', ' .,.,, ,-. , ' ' '„ ..•A -;-„:„'Yw X0"1.:;‘,\ ,e,'.',.:1..''',,:e.i...4",§',' to ‘7,,',.;101,,','•.." ;. ' .:4', .„:.„ ..,...', . ...:.;;,. , ', : , / Ipz.:,.. t4:,:: ,,,, , i • 430'' :,tizi`‘ , ''',14',. ':., , ,V.':..`‘,-.,- ,?,'' .,:,....,,.,,, .',,',',..' ,.\,. ..,-., ; ' , :1., , •-, 4• f .i.'4,, :.:,, ',1' .",..',A 1 V. ;e1140 WA'' .:t!•1'■;,;''%;;Vi;:."):;44:i'''''•'''''4;":;:,1,''':4 t• " '''''.:"'•‘ './.ot ;. -',.„ • ,. .'y',,,,.; :.'?:., ‘.11.4'.'11;.... ',' ' P.:4,",,.\•"• I•',f ,'7, Ni 'A '4 •••'t. i'lf±',.4.rtkittiONIF:::"t1;4 CP, I40 .1,4N.,'Vrly:ii,..'`.:d%;',,:..ii;..',' . :,'....,.,,,:.'4.1.14',.:',' '' It P.a."-:*..'.:' .:. :. ,'= 77.,.11,' ', -t,,q,' . * ..w‘ w,. . ,,, y,,,rtF„tf..1,,7;,,,"7:,....' keir, 1,4',v,C:‘,“.•;;-•;:',„. 1;,,.,.• '•'';,,i,'.' •°,1.:P..,, ' ..-4. '',‘ 'A',,,,j',,;" .(41, .3.'....,at,,..T, keit>,)3,-. yoZI,;;;;?,,Atler,,,,,i,..1:41!,,i124,.,.23 r'..,..17.fii,i.',". :,.,,);il.',!'014-%E.';1'•'',4';',''.,t7",Mfi;irr,L:,';';';•,'..::•••';',f;•;.' ,'.f-.''..'^;, '.'`i,' ,;';''' ',72 •'; `1. ' •IP'1' i '.ii, '141.1P' fiNtiWYJ '.'irMW‘,":4''OW....;!,*.'1,1?"11;;.t.t1;(.'',-,-,14,',;‘,11,.'"';',.,..'.i., '.',,".,,,,,,,,,,;,'7•ii..,,..,,,'i .',„:'?':,f.),....,1? „,..,:, i .., ,... ' , •..''',..., ,.i. 4,;;;',.,-,,'',T,..4 4, .,; ,,,'k.,k, -,t,,7404-,c4i; ,,:i.,,ov i,.1,.,-,,,.,.,,,, :..,..,'P'.,,.'im ,.', A-, ,,, !,. ....,,!,,, 0,, , ,,. , . .,," ,.... ..,,,,,... ,,,,...1.,. .,,,.,,,. . ,; ,., 1,, ., , ,t L,, .,,r. .. .,, -' ,i ' :, ,, , ',.. ' ' " '. :'.', . 4 ,',v',. ',,t4 . A - 4'''t 'm miqVgarnigekm-gi'mt,,,, mVni.tlioo,mi■• ...m.m m. 4,, m 1• t^,., , ■ , . . \ ' . ' •'• ,'',' .1' '.,.:1 --'.-- ,. ,.,,' ,-., , NJ. .„:!.,. ... ■ 1 ' ; ,.•,,4.,,,,': ,,A, b • ,1',' r ,'4,"• ', m .4,,.4,•' I. ;:f .'''. / ■ii'ti .4. Parking,Loading,ano Terminal Facilities 721 ''''' .,..',.,, 40 . f• .1 . „ , 1 • 4 1..:', _ Curb , , ';, ' '',.■ ,,,..r,,:..,, ,q • , '7*—F------ --- --- - .. - - ' i, ____i2—--— * d . Curb ,,, ...."--;‘,....)1 .t. ..„,,,181. ; . :;' 1 5, -- ,,..iv„...._ \ . PropertY li i le • li i.,,cii* . -- \ \ .' ' V..11040,144, .1 \ t k \ \ \ ''..■,,-...„.,.. tt .1 '32-t.e.5 , .•N••'.•,t.;,,ir‘' , I \ ' •"' ' ,4:'rr,f 4./ . 24' , 34' .,1 ...1.f::,. 4 flare '. .4--entrance ti:,..,..,?"-P:1,,,.; , 1 le.ngth width , rft 'gritit,; . f ktr,i... 11:,,I# Ai.;i . Figure 15,12, Driveway requirements to accommodate VeL3-50 design vehicle,[Source; ....0 ,... ui.. W13-50 path from A Policy on Geoinciric Design of Rural highways (Washington, ,, , P P,-41..gro 1'74 0.6t Americttn Association of State Highway Officials, 1965),p, 84.] . 4,. the left side of the vehicle. Likewise,this places the truck in the most favorable posi- 4, .xtte'' tion for backing into the dock. Care r.,hf uld be taken to prohibit parking where it may :31.Pkill.:i,"41" '4 ('' 11?i1ii conflict with truck circulation or mvneuvering into the truck dock areas, ....„ "'•..:4,' A waiOng or holding area for trucks is required next to the docks in order to ac- h,v corrtrnodate trucks waiting for a dock space, The size of this area should be sufficient ,,"...:g .,." . .r, , to provide space for the maximum number of trucks expected on the site less the -,.474+, '•' S• number of dock spaces provided, The maneuver area required in froi , of docks depends on the overall length of A . trucks using the facility, turning radii of the trucks, direction of traffic circu)ation, and the width of berths, A maneuver length of not less than twice the overall length 4,,'a •t;. . . of the longest vehicle using the facility has 1-+Pen recommended.' Another recommendation is for a maneuver area of 105 ft(32,0 In) with counter- clockwise ,•i'm I. . .5.0,$: , circulation and 165 ft (50,3 m) with clockwise circulation to avoid blind -okii.t4 ).• , 1'' right-hand backing maneuvers,' -. Offv, '—,.,..i, ,....r.i,' . individual berths should be from 12 to 14 ft (3.7 to 4.3 m) in width, Betths less , than 12 ft(3,7 m)are generally not acceptable.Minimum overhead clearance generally t:,-'.t.'1-4;''yg should not be less than 15 ft(4,6 m). Height of dock for servicing all trucks should be . r from 48 to 50 in, (1,22 to 1.27 m), Almost all docks built today place the face of the .!•.,h,r,,11,Tito dock flush with the outside wall of the building, The flush type dock can offer a f.,. ...,: • ?,:,-,t covered, heoted, closed dock operation without enclosing the trucks, Enclosed(1ks completely enclose the truck when it is parked at the dock, They i ...t .,'. - ofl e,.complete protection of goods, control over pilferage, ability to erect crane sys- %) t , terns or other overhead systems for loading and unloading of unenclosed trucks, aud an operating atmosphere 7 ,..t Ttifected by outside weather conditions, The totally A , "Y•-,.-4,•,i r,it., enclosed dock includes the maneuver area trucks pull irAo the area back into the dockspace,and generally leave by another door.A second kind of enclosed dock does , not enclose the maneuver space; trucks hack through a door and straight into the 1 .; . -■Sk li loading dock, Care must be taken to eliminvic the accumulation of vehicle exhausts ', .,' ,.,• in the enclosed area, '.---• .',..i..,"I .,,,,.....; it Pczekitig.radii/les Jo lodustris)Plato(W.i.qhing,tcm,D,C,t Institute or Traffic Engineers,1969),p.26, 1 ef..,,,,,,X■ . 8 Modern Dock Desio(Iselily,tukce,Wige,:Ketly CornpanY,Inc,,1968),p, .4 .,, ',,,,,''., I ,.. ,, ii, petI*•• k .1.,,i.si ' •t,,,7"`. Aligki• .''''•'.M4(t• '' i . • • • • 1'" '''... h . u r V." ' ,, 0<. / = zo , ,.....4 ,, 1 1! 0 . ti- . I 'L . • , N ii a ' J�q 1 '-i.,, .. ) ,:,,......,„,•, ,\' ,, { A \ ti, ° ; 1 •_ ;s a • ,z,a.l,+ n 1 f ., a , � �Mr w +aR tare wm . # M i /may,/y�]y /�}n ,,,,,.4.......... rrrr+ /'P I &1 0 r ,40,,,,;2,, 4; • HwL.M.,..��.,...•W� .r J 0 54: . , ,„ ),.). .„...,),:.,..),,,,,..„,„ . • ,0„, „ ' : : i, r..„,........10.0. -- . ,(z:,,,,,,.-..!-;.„ ,; ,„, * .i. ,. .i ),, ' ,.,,,,,,:It r..,,,.„,.. siv ,`",tri p:R.1— ' ' .0cr A'd,,,,-4)7" 81::4.1. — .P illF. 7"101,e'LI/kilei r., , , ) beetave,40,ekir • ,, . , '., '•*; it/60 7' ` 2,-,-)Pre-...,E)(a.)15, z.'ez, 'rte &key ?' ". ) 7 , rExl ! a� 1 i • o y TRAFFIC r06NT SUMMARY -44:1 ,..................„,..„.... ...\ ) . ' , LOCATt N .1_ JII i 1-7.1'7':', '''( r +, f------- BETWEE 2 1 �v ,".cC_; .-rY STREET CLASS'IFIC,aTION: 0 ARTERIAL 0 COLLECTOR 0 LOCAL NUMBER OF LANES .." _._.__.r ' DIRECTION OF TR ,EPIC -' . PRINCIPLE DEVELOPMENT GP AREA 0 COMMERICAL [1INDUS rF',IAL O RESIUENTIAI MON. ( TUE, WED. THU. FRI, SAT. SUN. ,y,.� 1�1E DATE cq_ (( G `�..7,g '4• - ."c7 9. / 0 REMARKS ........ . ...' N . 1-2 •• G� / St4- d'0 e.: _................_ 2-3 ) '' ', .............................__ ____ ' "� __ �� c rr ___,____ '-.16 ,1 a 6-7 ME_.. // 32. _,r-, . �•9 /1 I ','4.2-. 9117 rr .�. f l �G c� _..._ . _ , >. 10.11 it 1 / ( /4 —1 11-12 ii ISM `1 .. 12-1 b /t t" ' II^, %• 1-2 ....,............,...................t i.+ /7 IC-1 0O' ;.._ z 6-7, / •"`' /.6-4., 1C) ..c-it; • 7.9 /; 114 1 0 I�?` 8-9 9-10 69 1".71' e`` 10.11 ' TOTA i �, �. 7 11;k'i,I. O 4-7` �.t , .: ...._r l .: ) DAILY AVERAGE • WEE 1G E E,,S? TOTAL • L 5 d ` 1 ,..____.G WEEK a A Y TOTAL C-',1 :. '''' "? c r� �r a • WEEk TOTAL r .....]_.„......_..............,_,_ ) , '. , , M y .......w+.+.ww+un+.ww-r+P7*wnm+^ F ,w.,..,i ...w�..•' .,' ..»wv,ryv ��.4� , +« M, .,.,,,,,..i.w �` ' .n..w,Y.,.r..r. •.....,; tirn�WlYWf/MVT4MMMYn.<Wrlw. it O.*....MYR1 ., -wwwornminsaw,.. . 1 a ' -F.-I-L—E,NO, 1 . -, 141 1 ) , TRAFFIC CouNT SUMMARY " . LOCATION .. I-0 1.. ..{ I i, ...y° L''''':\*`.:., ,_,...._.... BETWEEN _L 7 rt r I. ,'4.,* / ;,. " _ ..w. STREET CLASSIFICATION: I ' 0 ARTERIAL 0 COLLECTOR El LOCAL NUMBr R OF LANES_ e__''. _ DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC L,., 4 t� •• PRINCIPLE DEVELOPMENT OF AREA 0 COMMERICAL EIINDUSTRIAL l;::J RESIDENTIAL MON. TUE. WED. THU.i, FRI,, S'AT, SUN, TIME DATE 9 ___�.�_._. y'_.7•� �i �� 6(— e-'(- !, REMARKS _ 12.1 / -,,5 .: r. ?/ t___ __ ____� � IIIM 1 / _7-3 . / -4 . e....-, . _4-5 r I 6.7 /0 I efq 2 _.r.__...,,�— ...__.. _ . ,. ' • 9.10 _ �,/ 10-'11 1 i /Cj 4~.°' , C , ._' ''` 11.12 ,` . i • `a .--.ti..."- 1.,...w.._.__rY... __-.. 1 47 I•.a / I 1 �._....._. 2.3 s 1 4 ;_._._, /` � 1' -Y — ..._., L..r.._._ .__._. • 1 0.11 �,�-- e..'- "V. 4 to ^r W 1..11r....Y..w r+q.:.:Y:.' r+....•..� i '9. -...+J ♦ .ww.r......... +r..rri..r. 11,12 ...,, L, TOTAL r'..t ��S 1 ` 9�:%., _ ._......_.:.±.....Y 4 .11 "......._J DAILY aVEFAO� 4 WEEK riNo TOTAL `-3 L3L . —. L7_, ,..„...,, ,_,_.[..... ......,___,.. I .....]_. ..,............—_,......................,.... z.; ■ AFFIDA 1 OF PUBLICATION ,F 1STATE OF OREGON, . ' Y" � �` ' COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ss. � . , � '. r I, .....,.. . 'CT O'Se �h .S•eha- e•r ,�'i ki,'.' g�eaq t ' t ttt r `,;, data it f,I�loV, g��' i s�tyunt;xt 4v�i1i +�a�n'sac��r:th;e, � r , being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher. FO•wi i Jtini�t' ' 4igb +8 h6o1 ;C ct�kre.. gObt e4 X08f;5 SW Wainut,`X'g 0, ,: ; � . ' ���S tit 197,x, ��•$r''�,:,�� , ,���: '�, of The Tigard 'Mmes, a newspaper of general circulation, as define^.i ' "'I, ,,.' , ' k 1 by ORS 193.010 and '193,020 ' The,l ianntarig,Comn;Ission���denial of a published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and Y eat tthe' � ,�e�,�rst b� .�a�hi�Sl��`�te�to�►�P _ , '�cdhd ioni.by the Tigard tix ibg i.�irec. state; that the legal notice) a printed copy of which is hereto annexed;, wris toy' regarding ,constra tlot +of a published in the entire issue of said newspaper for .. M...._.,.. successive and \ �w iici B tits: �, ' ,�WaSh,Co Tax',�M a i S1`12A 4.* l�oa4� �,'� consecutive weeks in the following issues ..•...w.. '''';'..;(:)t-40/4);Which 00isat�n lias'bed'`J ap, August 30 and September 6 1978 '��eIed to the:Cttli Coup;aiL. „ ....................._.. .. ...._..........,. .•, .. .. .......,..._.._.. •, Tk�is l'i�eat'iog wti�b��a t�iii+�vid�ntxai, •i 'heai�ia� dth' ii'o o►elms artt :.'np o g ttoit�t t# � ...... (')/t-14- ._.... ......, ,r�rtts 'VVZii lip gaJ �,;��fo�pox � �,,� ea , is,eTli erice at`af1 tt' Cross ekEinaint ., I , r Slgna 9'17/4/ 4/7--- i e) '� � �� ��+C13��►��� ,�� �+, 8 "OR;i5ti CAF 'il Gtl' ' >,,,, , c '''. , 1 ! '' Stibscrib'ed and ,sworn to before me this .......... 7th day of ! {" � �.' � '. 807 'Pi .' `'30, Sep i,, ,• eip`t�ernb e r 1J. ��S ,.. ....,,. �.... ................ w„„.., ,., ,,.. ,n..„pv. '' 4...........�. ! �°.,.... otar Public oi• Oregon i y g My connmis5ion expires ..... COMMISSION EXP1 VELa,.,�6, 158P 1 : : ., 0 P ,a ,.. a .... ....,., September 1, 1978 johu Smets 6830 .V„ Bonita Road C Tigard, Oregon 97223 . Re: Minor Land Partition: 5-a" „APp .L . John oa to Dear Mr, e This is to notify you of a. f1,0411 evidential hearing to be held by the City Council at t Iow rJnirEgh School L t 4 Room, 10865 8.W. Walnut Street, .Turd, ►ni„ on September 11, 187 at 8:00 P.M, on the abcive nentioned subject. This site is ° located on Bonita Road between the railroad tracts and S.W. 74th Avenue. As the NPO #5 Chairman, the City felt You would have / valuable input during this hearing. Please ft d enclosed the necessary background seal n this problem. $iierely, Loreen R. Wilson Rocorder pro- .eQ „ ! LRW:d W Uncle wtHk •— rzw ',x yC'.":•a +r.h..rui r.•w......,.:«..:., „ .mrcm., .,. ... . ,.......,........... ,. ..» .,,. .. ,...- f yy. ` � a..M sir r i .. .... N�♦ .� r" :6'S. f , , :' August '31, 197rA . `i I,}• • qi,. 1.1,71,°�'O VV,.116th Avetne Tigard* Oregon 97213 Minor Land Partition , 5-7th Appe41 .., ..John SItourta • • .i This is to notify you o Lunn evidential hea g to be 7 14 '4,he City Council at o ter Junior High gehoo1 Lecture Room 10865 i Wait treat 9 Ug ard, Oregon., on p unber 11 1978 alt 81100 Polio o she asbc wren oned , s h3ecto Ihis site is loot on !karate. Reed h uen the r"ai1 v ts$ tracks ' and 8W 74th Axed°e o .At the Plannitg Commission, Chat m n, the City f,4.-At, yo* ou1hve va cable pdur t g is o t t g* ' need background r on this aaotb <, s'tn tety, . orten, t ,141.1 on , . : ,, • . ' : , : . • Ik. J R R August 31, 1978 r ' r Joe Greulich *, 0# Dox 286. Ms, Tualatin, Oregon 97062 Re t Minor Land Partition 5-78 Appeal - John Skou t a a Dear Joe his is to notify you a 4 gulp. ':videnU. ,44 hearing to be held by the City Council. at Pavlov Ontior nigh School. Lecture Room, 10065 SW Walnut Sheet, tgarc „ Oregon, on September 11, 1978 gt 8:00 P,LL on the above mAntliofted su' , e v a This site is located of ion L ,a t mad between the railroad tracks and SW 74th Avenue. :' y\ o 2 ed ba a»itg /O fl r' materiel on this problem, please contact this of ic Sincerely, • Dram tk, Wilson Iry • 1/ ^ f: 1 d • 1 , , 1 7, . . . , . . ' . , ,.. I. P, , Ausuo; 310 1978 :. •• •:,.,,., ..• '4'e. .. • I, „ 1 . .■. : t, I , I • 1 , ',,,' • i Meteua A* 400d , , 11406 50 Iron*ood Loop ,J.,,, ,.,., 4440it40 Ortgon, P7223 ., , - \'. ' Rat Min0V Land ra'ttitiOn .., 5Q76 Appeal - John ourtei t it.t. , ',, '■.:- Woods . 1 , 1C.,:lt1111; 1)'' 160ti31 „11,1:'ii:: fli411'.'ttl;c11:!'t;:i1,:!:Ilitl ,1 :',gg. ' 811fl',.',; IcE14; 1'1441'1 ,.tul1 (1.-2!:Ytt0 \\I, Ttgard0, Orogoo,0. on September 110 19!8, at 8$00 Poll,* on tha above ttoned tie 'ha:00 sent bet*.ground material to you under separate covor* ' 4'. •., :If you hove, 411Y questione regarding tbil ralatto *: picase contact tia office* , It, t•-• ,,..,;'4.-ii , , , StecoteIyi ,..,. ,,, .,,, . ., .11 , (C./ 1 i '''.V , :•r ' 146veetk Wition ' . Recorder pro-tem . tot ,',':, -,' , '. ... , .,, '., .4 • ', ( ,. 1, I I ', - II1 , 1 , , •., ,:k), *. ..,. .',t .,..i.-_, ‘•:'. -`,.,,,:'-'!■ w-.414,•,,'' :.;_. , „ ! , ! , .;: ,,,•, ',, , . .0„4 ,1,,•J , , .0.',i,7,•''',' 11?), , , , ,, ,., , ;.::....,..4..,L„,,,,",..74J-..;.,.' r,/, fur ,, , zs r y e • n 4 _„ ,`, August 31, 1978 „Y \ 1C I U 'rod Anderm'on p, 0* Bog 2306 Tigard, Orogen 972 r Rall $1i.not LAIld P4... i . A-7$ Appeal Dear Mt* AIWereont A ,e i i t o UUy Y c foil f � d Atl t ht 4 ri.n to ',e hold by th City,' C uit ii tt Toulom Jnniot High .80;4 ' ' ►o tur e %,..,4m, 10Po SW Wtltin Tigard, Oregon on Septilmber 110 1974 at 8 t00 11014. on the a o o 1, ntiouod su1 a 1t If yod have any queetions 1:olga 4ing this matter, please fz .l free to oontact ma. re P r,` ne Loretta 0.1 ilObn ”, a�'' gotor4atM pro.ot 1 CO* John Skotett445 0 a : o ), Safety Coo 's r 9 q' '. 4. • t'w 4 ty q1 11 , c ', n i Jf n ..l yw,. " ,-�-_- aa�rane.�,�'..^.^.^ rap• ,caq.v. .aas-. .,w .. ,..,�._ '��•�.a.e�-v nw*4>">+r. i«nn +-w, """"w"..""^"n�q`M1 , ':unanay�:- , r yam',..y„�. A• A � ' ' b LIEN , CITY OF TIGARD to �,..; PUBLIC NOTICE • APPEAL rl that the City Council will consider the following Notice is hereby given th � Ci y g at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard,, Oregon;; on September 11, 1978 at 8:00 P.M.: APPEAL - NI°tSCELLANEOUS - The Planning Coam ission denial of a request by oY John Skourtes to appeal the decision by the Tigard Planning Director regarding Minor Land Partition_ 5-78, requesting construction of a warehouse at SW 73rd and Bonita Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map ;?S'l 12A, Tax Jot 4000), which I . decision has been appealed to the City Cour,i1. q a This hearing will be a fu 21 evidential hearing. Both proponcots and opponents will be given a \ opportunity to give evidence and to cross-examine. BY CRDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL If Lateen Wilson City Recorder. pro-item TT -- Publish August 30: 5epri:ember 6, l978 � Y l..w � q....- vY+ !M -..n.� ��' tl � ,,,...., ... • ...�M.�..i�,,, IV yfy` ,. t'.. :1. �� P•a-.cw.m ... .„..,n�,,,, yV ' µ� _ 'lm ` �- � Y1.� '�i-, _. ' 1 ■4 1'd. 's . ^, • „• ;r AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ' STATE OF OREGON ) ' " x County of Washington ) ss G a ''' City of Tigard ) ° I, Debbie Burgess, being firs`: duly sworn, on oath depose and say: r Tha That I am Secretary for thr Planning Department for the City of Tigard, Oregon That I served notice of hearing of the Tigarc Plan-- n.ing Commission of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each c f the following named persons on the _4 9t/ _� day of 1 ,1 � - w , 19 7_, by mailing to each of them at the address 0own on the attached list (Marked Exhibit B) , said notice as herete attached,, deposited in the United States Mail on the .�� �` ._ day c�= _ r l97 , postage prepaid v I. a •'` Subscribed nd sworn to betore me on the �', ?7~' day of r 1 . 197 ; '" _ `• 0 111 F ,,JY'6 a lL, ,11%..1 1 I .G.1'1/ yU • ,N a. No•ary Public of Ore,on 4 Or i ,,t,;,Alx,�, c Omm .s s i o n expires: /�'--• 0 6 - Ik , y C ;ti 7 . ., w�,,;w«.+»d,,... ..,,...:..,,'.1;+ -�.Ero.. ron w+,w++, •'i, , va' n. ,,.,..r.r ..,... 'r'.":L";...,y« ,a,,,„-,,,,, n;, � .p I yr-. .. ,.. 1,, 1 j, ' ` ,P Y,14�"' � , '! J j T F TI CAA I D V � jj � 1'l�F••4 . ., I.-; Nra.r..,t P.O. Box 23397 ' nr •+.-rn G' 12420 S.W. Main, Tigard, Oregon 97223 `'. � August 2S , 1978 Dear Property Owner : 'I "^ ` .1is is to notify you of a full evidential hearing to be held, ��; by the City Council at Yowler Junior High L�..cture Room, 10865 ° S .W. Walnut, Tigard, Oregon on September 11, 1978 at 8:00 P.M. on the following iterri: • ., ' ' ? APPEAL - MISCELLANEOUS -"y A request by John SkourtE''s to appeal °,' the decision by the Tigard Planning Director regarding Minor ' L nd Partition 5-78, requesting construction of a warehouse • at S .W. 73rd. and Bonita Road. 1 ; r .• °" If you wish to make your views known in this matter, or if you , ;.: .. ' ',, only wish to avai:'- yourself of this opportunity to be informed > '�,; . concerning this project , the City Council invites you to attend this meeting. Tt 1 ,1 . 0 - d •i` eL r 'i: . ' r a 9 „. fir « t . sr' ^e , r'. . • f. • , " _ \ \',. ,.\ s, 1006.2' ' to�,� s. �'n»' ,.. -r. •r '}' ,. .\... / - _ n "„'• -.7' ( • • 4. ' + k .•,e.•• 11� M^ _ ''\ 4021 . • ` v \ y ri.884 4, . .81,11 ' V)e,..1 n.I4 tri rrretp .:':','-' . .. ..., ,.,,.., . ,8 ,., I': . r-. • -......_ . 1 .3; ' . 2- , . \ - r 1 (ii Si' . 18 . ,,.,..\ . .. ■ ,. • ,d',t• w,++ k'i;,r,qp ,.. t,e.L....... 8.912, C�'r,•'' ''•� /• Y , fy •/IF.•.w: .••...4. . .•+•” :t' •. n• ,i`•.•y....,Iy.' r. '.1. `« .� ____,,..(.43.2 M �'4LJ_.. �� •.' •"'.1.'•tM.Il• `Nw•.w..+.W i r+• •"+"' .»"r �•:,•,. ' 18"5-4f� • ,» k •6.•,•i.,,,..;:•.+y"-. „",`!t^.=�''11'.4; -..�'y •, 1 "- i r! 'V 4l V 501 SC ,��'jf�G`. r by ':.:,{i'i" ^.w q�a_y •. I {f•y•Y„'� ''^ti ,i.'1 ' �' t. /}/I,[� . /30.44, "••2 ta�� • ..„4 +'.•:••. -•.. ..r''. xeirTA UNOAY S014rlOL �,,. �'' tx 23<n,• y . ;i.. �fI ' R .f" •�• • • T . , . v4il• J08-:d10 r' t 4. ►r1r r .^+ , ,.•.„ ' , :. ..`,,•i ;in;±.6. 1rw„•�+, • ..y ti,,. _ ' N I QO • 7 •'ta:'... ••M ` "`` .0^�A� '.,, ? 813*'s�--°��-,.1'`� 'F 'r L-1 18.5........... + ▪ ;,.:.T$At�c49,.Y.f.+C4',15 R' ....., X1-4: ., 1' .... ..5„_e..�, .;r S ,. 585°�C It11l / ^�' ..„y1.:�.w,ki:., t ; ,;F Y:• ,...,,.•• .qq.,, 1" -.--�.T1- .��-J'•, Ya ` L ..t:.,. i 0 N £•iG� ' 709.45 6,8ir►C,a.7' 5.�^,......„.• • 2F3 3�^ _ iO4» ��000 _'',,; i - 800 l ° - "' • Iy01 ^ • ■ .,:.:......•••• X� lb.1,4e' df,', 1N ` g �. �,l4AG, 1900 I • •. 0_. T.? kE3 7C1 ,0.f 117 �\ ,'' 1901—All / i-r.. .,.,� ,.� i \r � /�f� • .o N a, I [N .....1,,„,.. �., SEE MAP _N D l7 K ��4 5Qt n - 3• i 1« ,' ” 1 t N89 2E~ k :9CI,l}___ _.� 1 j r1`:� 12 f 91 4 i i 111 ',-" •-�• xS99:,2`1f' 387,2 ` L 1 «, r 429.70'- ..___...` 0 -Q �" /� ' u. // WOO ` U V ,. /� : ,,„,, ,<-----"`,,,,,,\..?. : ' :7344— C`� o I 1 •e`�..._r� t .�^^�+' tot • o l'7) , \'' '--'.\12,6" ,, t•-• ,L.,„ 1,. ' , r . ...... ,•• S . , " ,�? i Y ..".....-�........_. :!1 , /245' '5001;06 , 1. • ,1 V. '�GOQ cf»r w39Ut"b>A''.■^- 0 1�1�21`� h�- .",r7-.:*�`;�.�•. ; r: ., .t-., . ts��a,��^ Z � 1100 2 10 1 . 20 �� 1,2:�.id. 2/7 A e. .LA I ' <1 Sl -tn 21 yr \a _� ;i 496,7J (j') a ;'3 ?00 ` C� \e_... ,.r"'X;tit ;. i ti� 2a � 0° s,97. CC S. dry.II 216) ,. ��� 230 J .1t: j_1L\j\J \I.� :_/ �> c S. 1300.2 f ie. , � `.i -� F:4K17 ,±y,�,y� j �)iV Cl "•�� I-1,0_1�"^-'1 I 1 ;,{ '„ •V" L'.fi�Sd c k---"-----,-- 5,�. - +✓J __l l a r.• `I =;, 1'K ro'� i t t' 3I:+.ri0' s ?'.' .1C r... .—........,„---,.,--- , \ :I. . .' . ! ,1x4 I,t14•f1 t J �`:J 1 !:_.t 1` 0 "p.,\'\1"a w. wi7�1 fH, .("i »A'J 3�i.^ HMiiKLIN b L.G. 5� j„ I 1, ;I Ale, rat :; • tt 1 I,�s,;P: 'il .. _.. t u1 C,5' 1300` .. 'reaftTaG' x' ,„,q. 1 ,"y.'•r h..rsn v .., •r+w+pwhM.lRt.TA•. �.. .xN.a• ,"�'� r t 1 L 1!'J s °hill , �"' c ; , 1 . P. t ' ' . ,4 iL E"'F ,i■' '!1,0 1 Councilman Cook questioned whieh F5gii,e ,ed ,-' ‘,., . ,• - ',. oae,'..eI. Planning Director stated only one m4it . ,Jt1 ,.. cl, wv.,,,tld be al- I ' ) t . low,...)d on sjte. .,e (d) ReemmeadavLon of Planning Director , . .. -. Planoing Director concurred with Planning Commissjon recommendation . for deniill of application. ,. -, (e) Public Hearing Closed • '• (:f) (eoneidaiall_on by Council. .,. •, • Councilman Cook asked Appl;cant if they w,Aud be wilting to close off thf, mnst southerly access from Pweific Highway ont.D their property? , App) inant replied that this would be done if Council wished. , . „ • , Aft ussion between staff , applicant , and Council, Councilman Cook mo,.ed to uphold the appeal with the condition that the most 'efr soother-1y drivieway access from Pacific Highway onto the property would 1,.-"... b4, closed off and that accese be provided from the Drive-in right-of- a . way . M, ,tlon was seconded by Councilman Sebeekla„ Apprweld by unanimous vote of Council. , t . 5. APPEAL - MISCELLANEOUS - The Planning Commies:ion dental of a request by John •kourtes to appeal the decision by the Tigard Planning Director 0.. reghrding Minor Land Partition 5-78, request ,ng construction of a ' . warehousc at S .W. 73-d and Bonita Road (WashIllgton. (. ounty Tax Map 2S1 l',"A, 7ax Lot 4000) , which decision n been appealed to the Cit.; 4, Counc ,l , '.. (a) Mayor Bishop noted that the applicant had requested a full evidential hearing. - . Legal Counsel stated the procedure to follow would be 'to hear Free , Anderson' s, Attorney fnr the proponentiapplicant,, tequest for a full evidential hearing, hear staff's ree,ommendation ano, then wake L'ecision , N . p,,s to whether to hold that type of hearing and whe:a the hearing should 4 d be held . I ' : (b) Fred Anderson, Attorney for National Safety Company stated his intent was to request a full evidential hear:rang based o the fact that the verbat'm transcript presented to Courvit of the Pianning Commission meeting was not complete due to a falute of the recording machine, CL y Administrator recommended Coune,i1 hear matter in a lull evidential bng because thare was fault with the recorder the night of the Planning Commission nearing, Legal Counsel noted the Tigard Municipal Code sth+ed the need for adequate public notiee of a public lie..tring Since the public hearing scheduled for this date was for only a summation of previous testimony t •,,,,e ttnd not open for a full. evideiAtial hearing, CJuncil would have to set , a new public hearing and advertise thP.t .LL rroponents and opponents would be afforded an opportunity to teetirv , „ • ..• % Pgg.e 3 - Council Minutes - August 280 1978 ,---7."" ,--,---. — - . .. - -`,7' -,— ''''''m--mw".".4. ---"r"'- , ----- ,,, , e. ''. - --rit—P"t‘' .-4, ke .• ." ' ‘ ° - , - s;,,' , • • cultK Legal CJunsel' s recommendation was 7 .'4 n ,7:4 hea2ing and \ to hear this after adequate notive gii (c) Motion by Councilman Cook. secon u il de,(.4 by Concman kickelson to reset the public hearing for September 11, 1978 at 8 :00 P.M, and publish adequate public notice of a /till evidential hearing. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. ' 0 RECESS - 940 P,M. - RECONVENE - 9: 50 P.M. ° , 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - August 14, 21 , 1973 4/1 (a) Motion by Councilman Mickeson, sezonded by Councilman Cook to approve . Approved by unanimous vote of Council , 7 . APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS $85.EN. 52 (i.) Motion by Councilman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Cook to approve, Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 8 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - RECEIVE AND FILE . Transmittal from Jeff Brown re: St. Anthony's Fall Fiesta t 0. 47 (a) Motion by Councilman Mickelson, sL?,conded by Councilman Cook to receive and file. / Apprcvk7d by unanimous vote of Coulici*J . 9. MONTHLY REPORTS -• RECEIVE AND FILE Building Library , Finance Pclice (a) Moti :n by Councilman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Cook to receive and tile. ApprDved by unanimous vote of Councli„ . 10. RESOLUTION No, 78-58 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PLACING ON THE 0 0 . BALLOT FOR THE NOVEMBER 7, 1978 GENERAL ELECTION A PROPOSAL I-1R A CHARTER AMENDMENT ESTIV SHING AN IN- =BENT CANTITE RULE„ (a) Motion by Councilman Miclredson , seconded by Couu oak to approve. Approv€d by majority vntp of Council. Councilman Sctheckla voting Nay, 11. RESOLUTION o. 78-62 A RESOUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIt MAKING POINTMENT TO AN UNEXPIRED TERM OF OFFICF, 010 THE TIGARD ' PLANNING COMMISSION. Page 4 - Counal Minutes - August 28, 1978 I iY ar '4 n t *--. m-, 1 j1,n Vi 1 s r „hi ' K s 5, ,r r ' AAf.\� :7+. s ,« ... , x, �]�Wim.•—'- _ •"b.7A kleYAlr1I 111SIMl�OMAY.wIOI�p}IYM r � „ Ii •.r,�- -........ ..r T J I • '1 „�,_,...,--..�... •• tea.! I : AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATI 911iik.:ci:dvrp CITY'OF TIGAlit��`" PUBLIC NO'FIIC.E STATE; OF OREGON, . ,,ti . I AP1JALS COUNTS.'OF WASJiI NGTUN,' ss' L'.11..! .� I a 1 l i I Notice is hereby given that the City •' Council will consider the fofiotlring at (~ilk/ OF I(GI.ii.� Fowler Ju-•':.,+' High Sohool Lecture JQ` eh Schaffer g I, .. ................. ............................... .............. ............,,_.,... Room, I08B',SW Walnut,Tigard,Ore- , on August 28, 1978,at S p,tn,: , 1 t being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher APPEAL—CONDITIONAL USE-a The Planning C.nnmission denial of a ,...'of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined requert by Arch Co,fora Conditional Use Permit to operate a Basking Rob- by ORS 193.910 and 193,020, published at. Tigard, in the aforesaid county and ' bins Ice Cream Store in the currently existing A-1 Appliance Store Building state; that the legal notice, a Printed copy of which in a C•3 "General Commercial" erne is hereto annexed, was on a 14,gi0 square foot lot atr11606 SW published in the Pt ire issue of said newspaper Pacific Highway(Wash.Co,Tax Map y' r for ,,,....2...,._. successive and r •... successive lat 3t■DB,Tax Lot 2601),Which deci- h consecutive weeks in the following issue sion hag — to the City been anpealed t August &, 23 i u7io" APPEAL MISCELLANEOUS -- ............. , The Planning Commission appeal of a r' .� J requeat by John Skourtes to appeal the ! `�..rr.-:i i<! ••. decision by ter:Tigard Planning Direc- 1 >``? ! (S!"�nature) for regarding, Minor Land Partition 1 5.78, requesting construction of a Subscribed and sworn to before me this... ,of Road lit SW 73rd and A,Tax _...... .......... da, load(Wash,Co,Tax Map 2S1 12A,Tax , .∎ Lot 41)00),which decision has been ap- ' pealed to the City Council August ..19'..7.8 ,� Tetimony will be limited to summa- y J I' tion of previous statements, g ,.!' 4e746GL/ f:<co�y ,.w.k,, , PUBLIC NOME Notary Public of Oregon ZONE CHANGE--Request by Cen- e - tury 21 Homes for a Preliminary Plan C(�ti9fL�I�SIiN i;kr�Ir� and Program RCV,'ew of a 42 lot Rest- , My commission expir es ..,.....•.,...-.FE6...13r,,, JE2 i dential Planned Development and __ Zone Map Amendment from R•7 and •-°— •—"---•�—'R-16 PD for a 10,62 acre parcel at SW ` 121st and Katherine Streets(Wash,Co. ,Tax Map 2S1 31313,Tax Lot 7200; 1S1 . 34C,Tmu Lot 1200). 13Y ORDER OP THE CITY COUNCIL Lateen Wilson, City Recorder Pro-Tem 4,4 'TT 3789--Publish:Aug,_16,23,1978 4 :8 . n a p 1 y w I A u . '` 0 p Vii3O / " , y 7 . y o n\ S r. •' ' ,"p !/w I , ,'c ( . , . .,r . 4 dp 1�Ayy. M r F I, it,,, . c,t. /8' FOR THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON % ''* VS In the matter of the pending ) 4 petition of National Safety ) REQUEST FOR FULL i & Company. . :n 5 ) EVIDENTIAL HEARING 6 National Safety Company, through its undersigned repre-- sentai've, hereby requests that at the meeting of the City Co,.a.n0i:l, City of Tiga,ryd, scheduled to be held on Monday , August 9 28, 1978, that National Safety Company be of`'oi ded a full hearing of its pending appeal from donial by the City Planning Commission 1.1 with respect to Tax Lot )'000, 251-12A before your impartial body 12 on the grounds and for the reasons following: 13 1. That there is hereto attached a copy of the transcript 1 of bhe hearing held on July 25 before the Tigarrc Planning Commission, f .dom which it will be noted that the transcriber was unable to set out much of the testimony due to a faulty recording, 17 ,' r That the star ,ments of various witnesse�� are indicated .. - 18 Ilk . 71E1 o 19 in the transcript too be inaudible or garbled with other gaps in o u �, the transcript testimony a11 of which renders the recording of ''' .y'''T't 20 �ryy fF'y� V • Mt ' g �s°"' the Planning Com�rl�.ssion, lie,�.rin, incomprehensible and �.rreliable Lit: lid! `''�s to the extent that a review thereof by the City Council would be .e „-1_ y ,GIJu a the p gig 22 gA insufficient to form a basis for any decision by the City Council i ab 23 and would deny the applicant ' s rights of due process : 24 , I 25 It Is further requesteer that the hearing bo be held on Monday August 28, 1978, that the recording media be sufficiently effective r 4 26 ,I Page 1 - Request for Full Evidential Z erinc, , o, ° 1 to enable an. accurate transcript of all testimony to enable a com- 2 plete record of the proceedings • NATIONAL SAFETY COMPANY ) A . , , '1 John R. Skourte, , President q t , g , r Due sery:;.oe of the above request is hereby acknowledged on r behalf of the City of Tigard this „ 3 a.',' of August, 1978 t7 Tigard b 4 , 11 7 . y r c........14,- ....: w- Wil,.sss✓o\\n, Cite' Recorder fizo"vs 14 , tee 15 16 17 4 s 18 L' , Aph, a 4 j ' a§u46 . 20 tl a,6. Cl g a Q aai t `c i,71,2., 22 cri u m� Z , ,, : Q �d 23 r.,. ,r 1 2 25 • D n• g'e 2 - Reque of for Full Evidential Hearing S*- r /, ` • , b l'. . , , r " , , \ . e, ' ' ? i TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION N . Verbatim Minutes For Planning_Commission Erearin - July 25 1978 . Appear:775ndiTio2 al Ose ML.7-5-78177an Skourtes 3.---___ -- .t.;etional Safety Company „ 'All TEPEDINO: May I have the applicant's presentation please. ,.# \ ANDERSON: I 'm Fred Anderson, chairman, speaking on behalf of the National Safety Company. I know that this has been a little • contention at City Hall for some time and until all persunalities ah involved with this case I would want , to ask your, for this body to decide how we get them . whereas i ereas we must look at e merits of the problem.them, . one of the reasons I am going to somewhat more than I - • really wanted to is that I have a number of exhibits 7 . here thatwant to put it on the record„ . . . . (inaudible) our purpose is to resolve our administrative remedies in this case if necessary and 1 want the record to be complete for that reason, and I hr s in my hand Exhibit .. 1 which I've marked, as you know you folks have it .4, :, always marked e_t the top of exhibits, and I'll tell you that, . . . . (inaudible) '..-b is Exhibit 1 is a document which oomprises a lease and the signing of the lease, / and a platt. The platt is of the tract in question, , 4 -, . I have a note of the plat t which I will put in separately from thAs, This lease was fu.emalized in 1966 by . Southern Pacific Company, William M. Miers, an individual. ■• 2 , It was enforced, as I understand, up to and Including the National Safety Company's ownership. As a matter . of fact, it was sighed by the National Safety Company's , a of the sUmmer of 1977. This author zed and permit . . s ) the use of the property for the storage purposes. I , • might bring your attention to the fact that the proposal 0 now by National Safety Company is also using the property for storeze purpo8es, The difference being that one on the inside. This on the inside 0-..'age, and the other pre-existing was outside storage. The ah, I'd like to pass these over and I like to have them be made ( port of the rece d for future reference. Now in• der to facilitate an understanding as we go, I have 're a kickolf of an . . . . . (inaudible) atbached to Exhibit , A mar'ked as Exhibit A0 and it shows that this lot is 155 feet wide and the most southerly extremity, 45 feet with at most northerly extremity, and extends a maximum of 505 feet along the Oregon Electric right of way and feet along the Southern Pacific right of way. Now re 's been some discussion on the (digress a moment) that this is a part of, the right of way, This is not , 1 ... , 1' ,.. , t. , 11 Page 2 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) 11 . This is not part of the right of way. It never has been . a part of the right of way. The, right of way, of , Southern Pacific I assume, was this highway--the land , over the tracks--established from Oregon, California, / New Orleans , and wherever you go. This tract for these many years. . . . . (inaudible) probably number at least N'. (inaudible) haven't been used for other than for rail- road purposes and therefore is not taking into consider- .• ation . . . . . (inaudible) right of way using the piece of . land that, as any other piece of land would be. Now we have here in my hand Exhibit II which is a right to .,.. sale deed, a description whereby Southern Pacific • Transportation Company convey this fact that were under , . . search here at the National Safety Council as of , January 1978And I have here Exhibit III which is a III double or two items attached iogether, ah in the light of this (inaudible) here, including a lot of go . , around, we 'll try talking bout different about water, fire protection and so on Now I don't think there's anythinz in our present situation here that requires you Zolk e. to be concerned about those elements. But since it same up previously, I want to do what I can to enlighten the record, and ah I suggest to you that these wdtters could be better treated between these other than , . . (ine.udible and the applicants important . part of the argumont here. But so that we will have an understanding what this is abolit, this is a letter from the • (inaudible) James Company, concerns . insurance brokers and their consultants. To the Supervisor of Public Protection Department of Insurance ...v. Service of Oregon in Portland: ' I am writing on behalf of our client who 's currently conotructing an all N\ steel building in the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District. The building, when completed, will be . occupied by two light hazard tenants with each s,lace I cou yin ,000 s uare feet. This buildin has been opg5gg located on the south side of the Eouthwest DonIta Road and along the Southern Pacific and Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. The tenant fire hydrants are within • 500 feet of the building, but thecie hydrants are located on opposite side of the railroad tracks from . 1 0 ) R- , building. :IrZhPi:ntia2d1r a ec-Wnlg.etelgialt-eg 11 caused by placement of these hydrants. The answer from the insurance services office, which is become part , oi the rattng bureau, as we know it, based on your desortotion of the hydrants protecting tho property located south of Bonita Road, near 74th Street, between dr the two . Alroads, the applicable 2nd clae would be class L . This including the actual proposal distance buildkr. Lo be less500 feet from either hydrant rump, . , ' ' . hydrant6. Both of which are situated aorooS the railroad ,,. , ,, __ , , _ -,, „7-- - _. „,, , ---i. r Page 3 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) tracks. This applies solely for om rating and Araaa.ng information in the form, and for the purposes intended. May I ask - - (inaudible) reply repeat, that the building this has this is assumes that a fa,st. Now I have in my hand Exhibit No 5. It's un the letter hr - here of the Public. Utilities Commission of Oregon, dated March 9, 1978, Although, it's addressed to Mr. Skourtes, I suggest to you that that is immaterial, because the National Safety Company has other people on loan to stockbrokers. . . . (inaudible) . And it says, please refer to your letter received March 1, 19780 concerning your desire to construct a driveway to the entrance to property located between the bridge crossings at the Bonita Road and the South Pacific Transportation Compny and the Burlington Nortern Inc. Previously, we said there was no objection to the construction of such driveway providing a no left turn sign LS installed on the south post of Bonita Rnad. A Tt is Pour understanding that such sign be installed before any vehicle or traffic makes usci of such new roadway. Should the nature o.:1: the use of said lane change in the future, the Public Utility Commissioner has a right and obligation to insure the safety of the motoring public using said roadway. he purpose I,m suggesting with this win. show that these other folks who have who have the ah jurtodiction of the, state the fact that. I have in my hands Exhibit No 4, a Washington County driveway construction application permit No 804A that while I can't very well read the form to you, it does say that the permit is granted and right of way proposed to cohStrue.t a driveway above noted, address. The address is listed here. . . . . (inaudible) . Apiianh believs to construct said driveway to Washington County standards and specific,9.tionci driiiway construction. Signed by Sam—Somebody? (Writing is about as bci. as mine) . Now as you're well aware, there was a staff report issued in ah April 27, 19780 \,‘ that when is had been read it was denied. Ah I want to say now that you asked that . . . . . (inaudible) . T'm not going to argue the. . . . . (inaudible) , but Mr. Davies argued With me. Ah I'm flattered that he 's here and • can - - (inaudible) regarding lease. Now . . . . . (inaudible) he's asking for anything, but you need the property for an opportunity . . . inaudibIe) a highly expensive process (inaudib procedures. To continue use of property for a legitim, purpose. No .,.one change. Those don t t change. No conditional u8c Nothing. This isst:,e . . . . . (inaudible) 0. K. Now, the property was used fo.r' storage befF)re, is going to b used for storage again. The storage, T. might suggest to you, the use of it does no4 load the sohool classroom • '.... ,,,‘„ t, .1.!.. r' 55 , ,, .' ; 4 r , .. '''',. , , • . ., ' 1 ;',. Page 4 (Appeal Conditional Use MLP-5-78) ,, . . . • . (inaudible) the problems today, ah, the school , . ,.. ' district announced that they've going co float a bond issue to take care of additional kids. Ah, every ,2 " school gets loaded up. Now here 's a chance to get , some property on the tax roles without adding any school children to it. And you may just well leave that ,,, ."' . . . . . (inaudible) lot more of it because of this l'eA limitation of a. . . . . (inaudible) li% of this property taking a conservative view would ah $120,000 would be ... , f ' what, li1/0 would be about 3 ,200 dollars and 1,800 dollars. To tax money that is available to augment the tuir'‘ ..'t- burden, public burden without any added burden on the on the ah facilities. Now ah, I suggest to yo,J. that's a worthy objective, and I want to comment briefly on the comment or two made on the ah staff report. Now I know ah, I've been told by more than one that that ‘ little bit of enmity between personalities involved (barr me I might add) as afar as . . . . . (inaudible) , so , t .. . 1 . . I want you to look at this thing for what's good for - , the public. O.K. What's your public problem? I don't see any public probJem. I looked at this area. ■ P 4 ' 1k1 ' I've been familiar with it. I lived in Tigard except '..,' , for 15 years out of state for a number of reasons, and . '..,A .0(40 .., ,-, I was an t&xpayer, and I'm on of them too. I would say that LS a justifiabl use I'd say it's one that ... , ' ..,, should be approved in order that we can get as much !' , tax base from those facilities as do not add to the s, ..,. , tax burden, and this is an opportunity. Now, the sv ,, matters that were stated here, many things that are 4, , stated in this roport are, what we're saying, ah, extra ', ;, curricular. They don't follow the annals of tile city at all; cause they're brought together, in my opinion, ah, and I'm, ah, . . . . . (inaudiblo) to give the applicants ..' 1.., '.. tsl. ol:elc-lg.:/tllogl..V,-eT 'TAsA.drag6'11?),Ie-e;higar'IY-ctTlot?8tt:ll:r'T.ffdand -, do what you do for anyone else. Now, one rter aspect of the matter, spose you may have looked at if, that , e • ,,,-. , , 4 t is that 2 is a sharp gradiant from the public street 4 4t.. to the back of the lot. Now it was mentioned with emphasis in the staff report what the minutes with tills. In N 01 ' Well, I can show you a great number of lots in Tigard that have a road (inaudible) with a title to the , '..` ' street which has been set back lot as any other but you've got to get to the lot. sack lots have a narrower access route and 50 feet of road is considered to be ,.. , sufficient, And cyan though a less or greater amount is required to bullu one So in this oases you look t the plant, you will see that there is plenty or room .,/,p 1? to put the building proposed here and have a wide ,',4 '',,i5; . ■ , 4 driveway out to the street. No question about itu I Secondly, this is subject to design services . . . . , (inaudible) . . . . . 4 (inaudible) 0 . . . . Those matters, ...' , . ii, r . . V' ee , I f -, ----. ■-. ---. .,.,. .........y„...... ..,................ '•i .:.•'r ■ ) M, I Page 5 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) , I landscaping and so forth, and set 1—Ick, an an set back legally, Let back actually will cc e out in that sense. But there is a gentlemen here who is an engineer, who ' ,- .,, has an been concerned with this project for some time and I'd like to ask him to tell you what his plan, or what is being done, will be done, with respect to the access, which seems to be one of the elements of concern, and nustifiably so, in your srhere. So if he would, I will call him up in just a moment. I see anuther point or two that I have neglected. Now, sewage is available , ,..., . immediately to this property. I will lend my hand, in fact I would be willing to put in that I dind't intend to deny it, and we need it for our record that 1 r.-: would, ah, be willing to turn it over within ah property of subject applicant and that from the unified sewerage agency which says in effect that ah a get out would be ,,,.. provided with property and ah connection we rlade to the se,:er that's going through that area and through this tract and ah they'll be usual detention storage. I also have a letter here, from Washington County which on tho element of jury have heard comments on this line to different National Safety Code to property owners. The propo:oty, this tax lot being mentioned, was ommited from Washington County assessment role for 780 79 taY year Please be .dvised that according to the condi. ,rns S' , y of the NPO #7. . . . . (inaudible) , the table was 11.20 i+•,. (Tape gap) *1 ,' ' Now, ah I know there mLght be some feeling that ah a t ,‘ ;. deed hasn't been given because of the committee, the tax lot hasn't been created, because you all know of the little. . . . . (inau6ible) not this right of way property is taxed on the highest level in the state, of the state department of revenue. Assessors cut the , 1 tax . . . . . (inaudible) back, so this is a now an opporttnity for this piece to get on Washington County , .. 1 ,•'. tax roles . . . . . (inaudible) , bu I want to mention one other point in that context, now this is a unique case. I think counsel ought to (inaudible) after that letter where he admits this is a unique case. It's unique in tie sense that the use of it for the purposes heretofore, see they, predate particition ordinance 1.,5) partician law, and ah It's unique in the sense that this use not been addressed now, that it is property , .d ., that is apart from the rail right of way, y9t can ah , . pass on the highest level and has already made into partitioning attributes to the these many years. So I like you to consider all those points and do what, , .. I think I believe is in the public interest. If there 's , property on the tax roles and with a building on it, helps support our public present necds, I ask you to ,., concur, to look forward and fill a slot with these P applicants citien to delay any concern about the ‘ . i',.,-• , - ■ ' " „., . ,. . , 1 Page 6 (Appeal Conditional Use MLP-5-r/8) ., applicants. . , ,, ENGINEER: What we 've basically done and I'm not really sure it . 4 belongs in this meeting, at this point. . . . . . (inaudible) , , tut what we have is if you'll look at that . . . . . (inaudible) r.1 portion SPR and Burl N RR here, what we have down here is the porfile, keeping in mind that your horizontal , ., distance is as compared to the vertical distance is " t k . . . . . (inaudible) . what we're planning on doing is .1 filling this area that here now exists with probably st. two feb or more in this area than bring it up to same ,,, - grade as the Bonita Road at that point. At any point ., , ' there wouldn't be the maximum distance from the ah \ site distance from the ah 40 feet parking on the right : hand side of driveway.. Always which w drive right hand side. . . . . . (inaudible) O.K. On the centerline to driveway you'd be on the righthand side. There 'd be no more than 2 feet maximum elevation change between 'i r. the driveway and the top of road. A Volkswagen is 42" , side by side, so there 's really no problem seeing over q, the railroad access. , QUIMBY: How much fill are you talking about? . . . . . (inaudible) I --, piece of property because that's the way we used to -• . . . . . (inaudible) , , t ENGINEER: Miss Grant we 're bring up, •:, QUIMBY: And that's pretty ' , thats pretty deep. What kind of . a fill are you talking about? ENGINEER: USA is bringing the fill up. i QUIMBY: Oh, that's interesting. ENGINEER: With materials left over from the excavation of the, ,,- it's a waste material a'Zter we haul if oft. QUIMBY: In other words, ah Unified Sewerage Agency, which is ,..11 37 us, we 're the taxpayers we've been supporting this for years and seeing no benefit from it once again will be subsidized. ,.,,. EINir 1\11.:ER: No, no. We 've been paying about S5,00 per yard -;o ..., got that material to haul it off. The National Safety Company is acutally doing the service for tbis project. ,-..1 QUIMBY: But you still haven't told me how much fill that will 11 require, ENGINEPR: I would suspect about 60 yards. , . i . SMITH I have P question-, What is the prime width on the , 0. ,_ _ _____ _____ _ __ __ ______ 1, ...... ................ ■ , , ... • : S r P% ) • • r , '' • . , Page 7 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) , , Bonita Road between the two railroad right of ways? ,.. , ENGINEER: Between the two? ' ,,,... ,.. „ ,. • UNIDENTIFIED: 90 feet ,, ENGINEER: There 's 35 feet from the center line to the Bur14,ngton I r Norther, 30 feet driveway and 25 feet from the Burlington driveway to the SPR. , . WOOD: q0 feet to the railroad track to railroad track not the right of ih,,,y. edge the 7Aght of way edge. ENGINEER: Right of way edge to tight of way edge is 45 feet. , WOOD: 45 feet in front of the parcel. SKOURTES: 45 feet. , ENGINEER: We have an extra, there'r, an extra 15 feet dedicated , 4 • back there. TEPEDINO: Is there any other questions? : SMITH?: I have a few questions for Mr. Anderson, but. . , . . (inaudible) : , i. • I'm not real sure about the ah. . . . . (inaudible) the basic , s-eats, whether they were seen or lost. . . . . (inaudible) ah 6,000 square feet in a 60 feet miniL,am lot with, but these requirRments are applicable to rectangular lots, ..,'.' , ' . and not necessarily law, and not necessarily odd shaped . .' lots as we 're dealing with here. Ah there's a statement C ‘,..z., ,.” in there that the ah that the that we 'd be getting into A a hundred year flood plain zone ah 4outhern portion of , , the lot. That's true, but.. we've rot a boxed area we , .,„ aim to work „.J. to about 501 75 feet beyond the buildirg A' ■A because it's a severe...drop. 8 or 10 feet walk up. Ah like I say, I think the staff reporter thought that: it was, 1 can't tell whether these ab are actual statements f.., of fact or whether ah at that time they were in violation. That's all P TEPEDINO: O.K. Thanks. I '1,hiLk before we ask additional questions, I'd like to proceed to ah any other proponents :.. and ah and ah then go on to oglonents and ask the city A attorney to represent us on some o.t! those comments and then we'll go on to questions. ,., BAILE'n Is there anything that you have to ask? .. ., 7) 0 WOOD: There 's briefly for -the record to clarify a few points, .4' ‘ ah I'll figure out later whether theyire relevant .s or not. The ab when or the first time was this parcel separately recorded? And has had separate legal owner- ship? 4 4 , ___________ sfs.s * . 4' , , 4 .',, • . . , ,s \.,,, - • it Page 8 (Appeal Conditional Use MLP-5-78) ,- ANDERSON: Well, ah B title ownership? ' . WOOD: B title ownership. ., ANDERSON: As far as I knor B is the transfer of title. WOOD: Does ah did was has have any previous building permits been issued for the land? , s• e, ., ANDERSON: I think not . s„ s.s., , s.. WOOD: And ah am I correct in that when I was out there, the land was , cleqr is is has the the former I the former owner discontinued any use of the land? ,4 '" ANDERSON Ali well let me s , . :5 WOOD: I sorry leasee former leasee. s ,ss 4, ANDERSON: Let me ask Mr. Skourtes, Mr. Skourtes, was that the ", os former owner, Mr. Hyer? ,A ,•:. ,,.. !is ---4, s, SKOURTES: Still using accommodations there. , 4), .., WOOD: Is ah 1 I I is was the former leasee any predecessor of .,' ,' interest to the present party. By that, is were the (),,, predecessor company or or or was there any common „ ownership, t ,./ 4, ANDERSON: Its a oorporFate ownership how, you mean? , aci.s. WOOD: Yes • .,' 4 .,, ANDERSON: I don't think so. For years it was an individual, and I don 't believe he 's the one we talked Of ) WOOD Thst's all. ' - )' SMITH: What is it being used for now? , ANDERSON: Storage of :j , WOOD: Pardon. It's still being used for the same purpose at this time SKOURTES: Yes, there 'd be tat.bout a 050,000 still selling used ; ',, machinery, . '01 W00tt Well, I went up there, ah over the weekend I suppose and except for a bulldozer that seemed to have been involved a in pushing some ground around, I didn 't see any machinery bY on the site. Is anything presently going in here? t.' $XOURTtSt Well, ah with the extensive pieces we have hat, I haven't .4 . . 4r-- ,s,. s .s • , , 01,-- ,,,,,,' ----es-a, s-ss, -s.-- - - ..--- 7,-7",rerzr,--,, 1,,.."" ' 1,Y1„,dlit'm .■.■-...,- ...■....- ....■■•■..wr ..■......................■....... ............,...,••■•,..........,......,...WW,Mildlia.VMMIMIMMOMM,MIMMEMCAA.M. I.IMIIMIIMIN.Ini1.....IIMMIIIMIRMINNEOIMI. 4'.* Ir. ' , 1 , '■ ■ , t 1' Page 9 (Appeal: Conditional Use NLP-5, -78) , . v,, ,, . . . . (inaudible)been . . . . . (inaud .bly) at the lot. , 1,, There 's been a lot of scrap there, that' s been , .,,. . accumulated. Exposed out in the building area If you look there ah the layriten, on. I was wondering . . . . . ' ,. , (inaudible) unless you're in this type of business, 1 I doubt that there 'd more than $4,000 there. , WOOD: MaterialE. , ,!.. ... SKOURTE : Yes. No building materials,. Specially not ali ., : sometimes we have more .' ANDERSON Well, I wanted to azk, at least to exhibit to I would , .. , like to bring back to determine to into the city record or the record of your case. 1/4; ALDIE: You'll get them back -- gwranteed. 1,, , TEPEDINO: Is there any, ah additional testimony forthcoming 1 ' : fran proponents. Mr. Attorney again, do you want to . , add? . ' ,.. , SKOURTEfl: I'd like to reserve my ah comments . . . . . (inaudible) i. i for rebuttal at the end. ' TEPEDINO: You may need not rebuttal« SKOJRTES: Well I hope there isn't. TEPEDINO: Are there any proponents, ah on this issue? 0,X. I'd •A' like to call on Mr. Bailey. , BAILEY: I think we could start (laugh) you did talking about my ..,-; involvment. I feel like I have to s6v something ah but I only been involved in discussing first with Pred and then with Mr. Skourtes several times whe.:her Mr. Skourtes r• 1 ', had to go through a mino- land partitioning process at v'.., all. And I assume thab's not an issue here. They're . ,. they're herec, if that's F,., if that's an issue why, ah, they still have that issue in mind 1,Nhy they'll pass that ,, issue along another way. And I think that what they're .', esking 1116 to .,''' minor land partition I never asked and 'f,t) I haven't really been involved in It. \* ! ;,.t. WOOD Mr. Bailey, can I ask you about a statement you just made . 1 for if you'll read the code stated that a non-rectangular . •,;'i , on a collective street is not have to meet the front- age requirements of a reotangular lot. Do you concur in that? -.. BAILEY: 1: didn't do anything about that problem until tonight , t C.I . . . . . (inaudible) while I was sort of coming up here, and . if ,., the language is minimum lot width ah. It doesn't say 0.0 minimum frontage if you dou.'t have long enough to time to c i sr if there was some place in the code where that , "Trn'"'" "'..r4.1,4 ' ,*'. il ". '''' ■ t tillillgtWak: J 1 Page 10 (Appeal Conditional Use MLP-5-78) language can be converted so as to mean minimum frontage. If there 's nothing specific in the code , that's used to mean minimum fron.4...:.ge then 1 thin li,: language minimum lot Isei.dth would not prohibit this use of this site , because that would mean .'L.:hat if you ever had a call it's not certain that was is than 60 feet long you'd be in , trouble. WOOD: Could, could I borrow your book? . . -, BAILEY: It is No 18.38. . HOWARD: 030 subsection 2 , 4 1 ..Z ,, . My 1; .,' ,rb-Lziding, I just want some clarification because y it i, .E,.L .. gal point, lot width means horizontal distance betweb, lot side lines ore,inarily made in parallel with front yard lines. Defin ft,ont yard lines means the lot ' line and lines separatt he lot from either street or , streets other than an alley. And side line means any ,:. line connecting a front or rear lot line. The reason I am asking this is that it appeared to me from reading .. ''„, these definitions that width meant the the the front. . ' BAILEY: O.K. Well, that's what I did find and now that you :t ,1 , ,, found that it does .I'd like to look at it. , ..i WOOD: Is a significant 1 . '41, BAILEY: Parallel "GC the front line, it still doe5n't say its r '! parallel to the front line, but it doesn'i Jay that's what we 're measuring. It does seem to be, . . . . (inaudfae) . e‘ It does ($611 to say that if you've got a distance r, 1/41, shorter than 60 feet on some line other than a line r ' parallel to a front line, you 1 d be alrigh-1-,„, but surely r . it doesn't mean that you couldn't for example have a 1 broken line in front., See the problem of the wiim J. using width as a meaning the same as front line is that ' : ,-, it brings under the coverage that prohibition a whole wl J; set of things you have word had a line that shape. I'm '■' afraid that would be a width. WOOD: Which is the right of the read? B&ILEY: Well, either the road is. . . sv,Ju",- i): What would you think width means? (i* 0, Pr BAILEY: I think if you have a lot that was not at any point , -, when measured parallel to the road, if you had a lot ,, .% I. that would nowhere accommodate a line 60 feet long parallel to the road, that would be prohibited, And I L think also if you have a lot that would b8 in an area that didn't have an area that was large enough to build and Pul A b• 4 ,...../MINWM --- p., .,., . '. . ,',. , • , ,. . Page 11 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) ,.. , ,•,, otherwise allowable building given the set back, that , would have to in ac that space a place to accommodate a line . . 60 feet long parallel to the road. f WOOD: Would be ah, is that tract been .. wording be minimal lot width would be 60 feet? .. ,. BAILEY: Well, unless you can get to the word front, I don't think ,‘ there is any interference with their application at all. ,- Because they obviously have more than 60 feet of width 40 ±or an area much larger than would be necessary for many -,-, I allowable developments,, , • WOOD: I'm not sure the one ynu drew wouldn't fall in you .,: . wouldn't take it across for a long way because lot width , . is horizontal side lot lines ordinarly measure parallel to the, and that ordinarily might indeed indicate in - this one that the perpindicular side lot lines wouldn't ". be parallel . '.. . .t That's right. BAILEY: T never could make anything out of it. I've heard an ,., awful lot about all this ah feeling -,,hat is talked about and have forseen an early statue for it and am aware of ir, ,■A* t'. this. I talked to Mr. Skourtes many times about this problem and ah I've never been able to reach a conclusion 1, .:;. about the meeting of the 60 foot line group that I thought , „ resolved the problem . i . . . (inaudible. ) .,.• WOOD: Wall. I'm through. .... ,.., , '' + TEPEDINO: Weil, other comments from the city. ' .,1,. : BARKER: Well, I agree with most o the comments made by Mr. , 0 Skourtes and his mttorney Fred Ander8on especially the •,,,A, .,t.I. fact that I agree to place this property on the tax roles . , that wol,Ild be beneficial to all of us. Still I feel I 1 ' should point out Why the city, why the staff, and I feel I should point it out because the staff is gone that it would be a problem, it would be the application. The ' ,. ,- , t`. staff had a general concern, as they mot with me on several , occasions about this we have had numerous meetings with ( A 1 , Mr. Skourtes. The genuine concern that they had was for safety rules. Itts true that you could solve the problem, . ''. 0 ' 1 1 agree with the engineer who said he could solve the 4: i Pj 11'i pr oblem of getti-,g in and out of the property by filling because the them is substantial drop off from Bonita to , the property. The concern we had was the vertical align - ment with Bonita and should have in the folder there a report frn the police department who among others expressed , their concern when the officers spent some time down there ... 4 as did ttie chief (inaudible) fireman obh3erving traffic in that area and placing the patrol cars and squad cars ., , --4,4-if--Fr-i-r-- ---rr'.,r —7,--v-r *--r-7,---r.4.-a - ',, , I , 0 t 4 4', A,r, ''. C , • , ),::, ,,■., , ,0 ,..e. ,. .., , i, 7,. Page 12 (Appeal: Conditional Use MIP-5-78) • , in different areas and observing what happened as cars come over the tracks and on and their concern was with traffic coming out of the subject's property onto the , Bonita Road. Someone would come over the the , . . . . , ,7 (inaudible) and tuen little warning and they'd have an , accident a the tracks or with other vehicle coming out of the property. They also had concern about the ability of a large truck coming out of the crossing onto Bonita , to be able to make that turn without going into the other lane of traffice, in other mords they did not . . . . . ,-, (inaudible) would pretty well take up the street. So e, the safety item was the main concern of the staff. 1 . felt that that should be pointed out. I think you also have a letter in there from the public works '7:opartment (of the Washington ( ounty) where in tieey fe- that this 1,:,•, was a poor entrance that they cansiderd wou.Ld be the .7e second or third choice that they would make, as entrance , into that front and they mentioned this problem wi;',,h the .7.,t. vertical alignment with Bonita as a said that at some future time they feel that that etreet should be improved. They realize that it is a hazard. The 6taff felt but . , . until such time as .6hat is improved that this project, this request be denied. , ‘4 , TEPEDINO: Thank you, yes the next part of the agenda is the cross examination and rebuttal. , ec ..'1: kNDERSON: Well I'd like to ask Mr. Barker a few questions firs ,'. - Mr. Barker, would you ah would you're position as you've , now sa . id that ah the . . . . (inaudible) . ,,,, BARKER Continuous, yes, continuous. . . . . . (inaudible) a sign i'. they would suggest recommending that a sign be place6." there to say no left turn as you come onto it. That's c somewhat is part of the problem that doesn't address the . , t vertical alignment to me and people coming to and from , . '.,!. on Bonita. . . . . (inaudible) it addresses the matter of , , coming out of the property onto Bonita. . 4 AN)ERSON: One further question, Mr Barker. 1 6 • - BPRXER: Well, I feel warmly. Oaughter) ANDERSON: You're thought didn't, that this property of Ray Gorman .., to regrade the level. c,.. . . BARXER: Well, 1 wuuldn't want to particularly if it was my property, see it lay dormant and 1 would want to ...iee on the ba s. roles, but I also don't want to have any responsibility whatsoever for the death of anyone there because I consider it to be a serious brafiic hazard t AWDERSON: This is which crossing, both railroads. BARXER: 'Yes. ,.,.... ,t,—,t,. ',.',-*.• .., , 14, , '\ •.:e ' 0,4 ;.:,: • % , C': ''t ''' . . 4 ." '...... 1 • . Page 13 (Appeal Conditional Uoe MLP-13-78) .' -- .',■3 . And ah this be the turn for this traffic we use for -,,,,, ,. 66th to 78th corners and are you aware ov not that ANDERSON: No, and several times that I have been down there 1 , ' know ,I have never seen anyone go in or out of that ' ',..:':, ,e property. ,,, BARKER: But you said a truck has. ".1-.'ieces of pipe and so forth •4• -:"` are just ly-.1.).g there on the ground don' ..; contribute to the traffic , ,Alereas the use of the th _ng proposed to my mind would. There would be a large, it's a warehouse, '.' . ...e I .;.ssume there 'd be a lot of trucks ooming and going. .:' Now I don't see why it would generate more, than two or i!..'-,;,. . three cars a week. '' : ":: I ANDERSON: Well, would it be above all reason that if it is a problem that it could be . . . . . (Lnaudible) What I'm getting at Mr. Barker, you're in a position where you ,cr..,:g111.1, wcolhrs. 1=ghce):;eltoly)..a=dgatil.: the :-... . 0 1..yrorf.ta.,,oc the' . . i property for all kinds of uses because we know that . . . . . (inaudible) and there been ao change in that 0'1 crossing and I'm not aware of anybody getting killed at , ,,o, . ,' ' ' that crossing, but why, because they have policement who travel that road (iaudible) using extra caution or under the circumstances and we have many many hazards r so I want to rebut. My point is this That we know , i from common sense that this grade crossing two of thr ., .:, ' right there, and that the next intersection where 72nd , ,249.*'''' comes in those are all. . . . . (inaudible) everyone of em, ,l' "; ..-'' . . . . . (inaudible) and I aogEest if I may Mr. . . . . . 11.,., (inaudible) that Center Street. . . . . (inaudible) cross the intersection with Greenbury. . . . (inaudible) they get killEd every morning, why, because you allow the people on tbe south . . . . . (in audible) which can't possibly even see without getting out in the middle of the street. .• But what I'm getting at is the.t we should have a safety , ,..4, .. problem at every corner if thel'e's going to be a denial , , 4 : k;: , of use of property because of some possible hazard. That would perhaps apply to many many problems it Tigard if , I may say so. Many areas, and so I suggest that that is not in fact to be considered in this petition. , 44; TEPEDINO: Thank you Mr. Anderson. ,. SKOURTES: My name is John Skourtes. However, I want the members • to be aware that Bonita Road i0 a county road and I I don't know if you're familiar you don't do t go in thero and say put up a 25O bond and pay the $10 to get a ? , 4 . . , driveway through there. Now we have had to show the i county, now this is county road now its not a city road, , .,, that when were going to Xix the grade up there's not , going to be any more accid.ents than any other driveway. . Now any of you, ladies and gentlemen who havu' viewed the . . .,., e', ,t , ...,. ........... ........ Swilhanft, ...,,.r.famil11•11.91•10.011RIMABIl1111•11M13.0.0.411AMII■ • ' • . ' . '"' ..'".. ." r .v . . . . . r...., . . , . ,,,, ,,._ . '(:,', Page 14 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) y site, you noti3ed a driveway there now, right? The ,,,.. ,.. state and highway department going to removed the guard , ': rails and changed them. The guard rails were there to ",,. protect the railroad station because the railroad station - "' was plt in with federal m—ley. The guard rails were ' returned because the station's torn down now. Now once , we fill the graeLe my engineer said tha lowest point the lowest point from that incline from the highest point of , the Bonita Road is going to be 24 inches. 24 inches, . c ' :Yvon if you had a little scooter down here, 1 mean -tte " ,14.1 concern of the city was that somebody's coming out of that driveway and you have a high hump up here, right? You can't see. The car coming this way e%ant see your : But 24 inches is nothing, So this hazard is ovvious the ) fact is you're going to loan us money unless we gonna fix ',... that site. I mean ah 1 and my group as investors we're •%;, not gonna have a hazard in there. We can't rent the , place. We'd go broke. Were aware of that. We've tried ", ', to ah, the reason this really got off ilter was the staff ' never reviewed our plans. They came up, they asked these r• various individuals for letters like the policeman and the highway department, and then they issued a denials we ,Y, didn't have have one chance, not even one minute to review any of their pointG with them before issuing their denial. W,,: could have explained some of these things to em, . But , you all the letters that they sent out to water district, '.$4..: policeman, etc. etc. , most of the letters are dated , April 21,st and time was running out. They assured me I, ,Ijor they would review this in about two weeks in March. The •.; statues says you have 60 days. They were down to the '1 last two weeks and 4ad to come out with the report, anc:, .,.,, the next thing I know, they deny us. They didn't even unce look and see a review to see what we. were p:oing to . .‘. ,.' do there. This is why this thing has gone ri' and on and on now. 1 can assure you we 're aware of a I, ) grade there ana as far as the Unified Sewage we have a contract with National tixcava"bors to :out It the new 21 inch sewer line , And the contractor 1.-. giving us a bid. He has a 6 feet '"?..1. contract. He s the taxpayer. Anytime you trench in that's a 15 foot sewer that you put front half of the i.,., tract in gravel so of course you have to compact with ' il . . . . . (inaudible) . Any questions? , ri ,Y ..., CORLISS: I have a question on one point,, Is it all right to ask about the building? Nobody's asked anything about tbe building. -.4. TEPEDINO: Wal, he 's here about a landscalting, but if you feel it's relevant to your point ci . CORLISS: It is to me. I TEPADINO: O. K. .. , .. -- , .7-7", — . -. ,, - -1,.-r-rrrkr,--- --,e—r." ---me ..1.- ":"7"—'77',.-777.. "40.. vi.,. , . ,. — z.' -. t. . •, .' , , sk,,' ' ' . • , 1 ..' , Page 15 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) ,,- CORLISS: What are you using for a building and and do you have ' tenants already? SKOURTES Well, I have ore tenant. It's a 10,000 sq. ft. L shaped building. The building where the banding will .,t4i, be set in the lot ah see the railroad only sold us that .„, ,.0 strip plus they maintain 50 feet to their center of the track but. I'm leasing it up to the bank so right where the building is we have here the land is 74 feet wide 44; but of course we have another 20 feet so would be 94 feet wide and of course we go further back. We're over t ; , 120 feet wide. The front of the building will be 74 feet 0 . . . . . (inaudible) and 20 feet . . . . . (inaudible) The back is used for railroad cars. Does that answer your question? , , ,,1, CORLISS: I ask you about the tenants also? . -, P,.. SKOURTES: Well, ono of the tenants is a sprinkler contractor. 44,,, Most ci our tenants of 5,000 feet parcels never have a lot of activity in that small a contractor. CORLISS: That would generate a lot of traffic '‘,/ould't it? You'd have to have the employees coming in and out and , materials dei vered. 1 SKOTJRTF No, because the employees use the parking out et the job site. ."‘ Pabricating shop. CORLISS: That's what I mean, but you wouldn't have to have employees coming into the shop to do the fabricating. ‘ , r dt i You couldn't have. . . . . SKOURTEC: Well, I would venture, There 's only going to be two bathrooms there. You never know no what tenants, I would average the tenants would have three or four , people. 11 .. CORLISS: In other words your looking at some manufacturing 4' though. As well as warehousing, It's not going to be .: .. ) i storage of materials, there's goIng to be some ,.. .i, manufacturing, d i 4 , SKOURTES: Well, in all fairness, I don't know what's goin, 60 0 , happen in the future when the uses we are govc4rned by . . the NMP zone. . . . , (inauHible) . Of course I: Wt:4 know no wood manufacturing, because it would be .,, fire hazard, . , . (inaudible) would be low risk as far as . fire, The building will not be i.'prinklered b))t eh in all, fairness who ultimately rents it we might get some ' tenants but then your zoning ordinance contrcls it kind 4, , of client we get as it is , . . . . (inaudible) . But my experience has been that 5,000 square feet you won't .. , - , ______________ --mr-9,--e.,,,,.,-,..,..r.,,,,,9,,,..--4,---,,,,.,,,,,,,,— ,. .• ..1,c..----,-,-..f4,- , „ ., '1/4114.:,%•• ' ' - 4 ' ., Ve,;, ■.1 „-, , . . ' - 16 (Alyea': Conditional Use MLP-5-78) have that much activity. Yo ll don't have a lot of ‘, activity unless you have 30,000 ;square feet. , TEPEDINO: Thank you Mr. Skourtes. Well if there are no additional comments ,,-‘• ''',.. BAILEY: The ordinance Mr. Barker, Could you r:?,erond to the comments about the bill and reduction of the traffic hazard. Would that information bear on what you say about the . . . . . ( inaudible) . ,k. T BARKER: My opinion to we can solve the problem is getting onto .. . "' . the Bonita Road . . . . . (inaudible) and back on to the . . . . . (inaudible) . That still does not solve the problem %, . I 4), of the ali ement and . . . . . (inaudible' still see. . . . . gn \ i • 7 inaudible) . , BAILEY: What are the other options Mr. . . . . . (inaudible) , Have 4 ,0 they. . . . . (inaudible),, BARKER: The town mentioned some Mr. Howard. . . , / The 3east desirable access point goes directly to ,i, , Bonita between the two sets of railroad track s. de felt k'V;41' - ,,,,, the most preferable access from WashinLban Coi,mty's H( ,. point of view would be south across the £1' )U plain to an . ,:ii existing gravel driveway leading south from the spot. ,., ., ,,,:, The second most desirable access would be the private crossing below railroad .i-z.acks to 74th Avenue. The third i, R- . possible route would be the private croasing of the SPR tvack, on the private property to an ac s ces to . , Bonita Road at the are location as on the existing access , , -, about 350 East if SPR traCks. , ,- - \,,,!, . . TEPEDINO: I will now close the public hearing of this petition, and . ' . call for the staff recommendation please. r '' HOJARD: Staff recommendation of Mirror Land Petition 5-78. After t .., lengthy and detailed studies of this matter, staff 4 recommends that the Tigard Planning Commission deny 0 this appeal. , , 14 . TEPEDINO: lank you Commik,sioners? e. * Commissioner Speaker, do you want I comment on this? p-,... SPEAKER: Mr. Chairm841, I haven't read this whole report arid I , t am brand new on the commission but there seems to me . .- that ari. awful lot of planning. . . . . (inaudible) that to my :. it.. :Aind. . . . (inaudible) and to me that's kind of p.lheral. . , I recogniZe .thab. . . . . (inaudible) but ah. . . . (inaudible) , my inclination would be to say to the applicant that , I . . . . . (inaudible) since the staff appal feels there is a mal safety hazard and Washington County says that .. the least desirable acCesS to this parcel through Bonita e, ......-,...,. , , ,_,,,_ ,,,,,,, ....,,,,,,,,,,o,„,,,,,,,,,,.„4„, ,.„.,‘„,,... --v. -- 4 -,. --,----r— -,,,s . , ,'.,,, , • --■,.. - ■■ ....,....•■••■■•■•....+...... ..”... IP.MOMIS,.1=14.•=1/01/MilMELMJAPINRI.o.M.7•31.1. 1Ji r '..—r.---- '7 , . 1 , 0 0:4, 0 ‘0 1 )1 ' Page 17 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) . ,., .. ..:, '., Road that the applicant on this application should (inaudible) . My inclination would be to a6ree with , staff and what I would suggest to the applicalt can they i not get a private crossing over the old Oregon Electric tracks and that 74th . . . . . (inaudi 1. ) . ,.. TEPEDINO: Commissioner Corliss, do you have any comments or ideas - ,..- on this? I: ' CORLISS: I have no comment. l. ' :- ".' . TEPEDINJ: CommlAsioner Wood? , WOOD: Yes. First, I just (in, dible) very briefly. I've -7ead through this file in which there was and if there was ,, .,. bias shown it really doesn't erne out in this file. It was delved in getting startHd, but most of the tfme ; . during the Delay t was a period in which the applioant ( was alos contesting whether he should be going through a minor land pa:Aition ,,..t all, and I understand that ,, ..,. doing great work with staff while the applicant's .;: deny:.tag it is even applicable to him and any of event :.,., to get to the merit on safety. I would concur with the , , . staff and city administrator, Went down and took a look at the site. Tried walking in and out ef it. Tried .. standing 2 feet below the grade cf the street and seeing ' what I could see, Ultimately s my view is that recognizing ) : , ,, what the PUC has done and others I don't think they have , ‘' ...%':. jurisdiction over on our cwn judgement on what to say in Tigard. The and my judgement s it is is that this is not safe. I'll repeat why. The thing that impressed us coming ,A .-,,. or of the lite. You must get right to the road even with ,- ,., an incline before you can see just any particular vision „ - what's going on You were way down on the tracks until you get near the road. You get near the road. . . , , ,4. (inaudible) . WOLt; if yo n,14 stopped and i: 'Yu stop at that point and look 1 at ah if it's in a oar, rather than a track and since 7 cars will be coming outs I was standing up hiyher than a ., high level car. Indeed y,-)u oan see Bonita, but when you „. -,, lo,)k at that dip to the right the best you can do is e ) 1 m the top of the hood of a car. You've po-b most of the car '...: hid and yc.Ar visibility is restricted to a wuch less likely , Co see someone. Combine that are a couple of obvious 4 problems the PUC says no left turn. How the city i.'ouleL enforce thx,t beats me because that would be a private --; way, If you turned right as narrow as Bollita is you offil .. go into that, left hand lane. It's virtually imposstble ., 44, for any size truck to avoid that the ah uh so coming out , 0 I think there 's there 's danger there. 1Le real danger w, , the city administrator points out if you're coming from .. I . the right; coming toward that at least the guy coming out knows that knows the danger and can stop a little more ”- ? , carefully. Person coming over taat track, the best thing , - --;-,------.----4-9'-r- •r'''.'V"7"*""'"7"."'""*" .""r"" ''''''''.4":1,'i''',‘. i,,t• 4 A't • ,,• ,h ' , .C ;' 4 "... '' MI , Page 18 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) they are going to see is especially with a car coming out is maybe the top of the roof. And I think that coming over those tracks down in the hole, somebody else goes down in the hole from, using the t/aoks, eh you're beggl.nh for accidents. And I recognize that there are , danger spots in Tigard, bu m t I' not anxious to create mom of them. This is a minor land partition is part of an old railroad right of way. A strange lot located with a strange access. One of the things to look at in a lot 0-w of land partitions is the access. And my view is that !t I'm not so concerned you know about turning down a tax A lot or a.,_Lowing this to stay in State and be over the railroad that I'd want to approve a petition is at least seems to me to have a various and significant and safety hazards. ,,,,, TEPEDINO: Thank you Mr. Wood. Commissioner Quimby, did you have any ah comments? QUIMBY: None 1 TEPEDINO: Commissioner Brian? • BRIAN I think that the conditions that ah Mark pointed out ah depth er what I feel on it,, sure we 're increasing the . tax roles is good but I thmk we have to be selective ir in how we do that ah it seems that the applicant allowing a hazard when another hazard exists, ah the police report doe3 say that . . . .. . (4.naudible) . In their letter of April , III 22nd, and added to all the other comments ah ah.1 . . . (in- audible) , but I think that. . . . . (inaudible) . TEPEDINO: Commissioner Smith? SMITH: Nell, there's one. It appears to me that that we're not doing the prime industrial property, now It ran the two other railroad tracks. The shape of that property With the floo6 plain in the back- which is normally, . . . . P (inaudible) toward the land. First I would not imagine a trucker turning a truck around in some positions of that property. Ala it does not seem to lelid itself well to a ah industrial or a ah warehouse Site. And ah on the side to the ace,ess problems ah in regard to tax benefits then they don't feel that what it does for our' traffic situation is really reevant here, that i8 ah being based on merits of property in ilwetion. , TEPEDINO: Commissioner, ah, Roseman. Do you hove any comments? ';,. ROSMAN: Ya, I'm in favor of denial the appeal on the rocommendation 4'1 of staff. Ala. , T8PEDINO: Filte polnts for what 1 think you're all'eady heard. I've • already been down that road down past the Eat several . - T •.41. 4 , Page 19 (Appeal: Conditional Use YIP-5-78) . . . , • ' times ah today as a matter of fact, and the thing I notice . is that the trend that's Tigard as well as elsewhere in Washington County is trying to reduce the vortex of danger in . . . . . (inaudible) and around railroad crossings. And I I think the this application ah refutes would aggrevate , that. The danger up on that road crossing the road I P , 4 think that that through there, up through there as a k matter of fact is in violation, increase, the activity , that this very area would kinds agcereavate that. Also r,. I 'm a little concerned about access to the site, emergency vehicles to protect the people there as well A the other questions about the vortex of danger protection the street where ah passiig by I too would be in favor ' of denial of this. , TEPEDINO: Do I hear any other comments? Questions, or motions? A 4 : (Tape gap) SKOURTES: The fellow that wrote the letter from the county, he's " . the man who gave us the driveway permit, Mr. Morse. He 's not concerned, Now its ob"rious we 're gonna spend, we 're , gonna, we 're gonna build a site, it's obvious. ,) I mean you fellas are missing the point, and ladies. Were gonna fill the site. Maybe you can't envision. There 's not gonna be a , it's not gonna be ah dangerous. It's gonna be 30 feet wide. You can turn a semi into it , The guard rails gonna be redesigned. It's obvious, in 1 other words, ah, I think you should judge us on minor I , land partition appeal. We haven't even gone in for design renewal for permits. We 're not asking for a variance. Ah, let me tell you, of course you should not ah, ah, the reason you have our access on that property is because . the state will not give you a crossing against Burlington Northern tracks. They will not give you any more private railroad crossings. You all saw the signs up here at . • ah as you go to Hillsboro, just is as is a private . crossing? Those are out. No more private crossings. Iii fact, they're selling that property because you have 4 0111 to cross a creek, you don't control a property. Then you still can't get a cent for it because you can't get / across there. Now it disturbs me that there there' s you're gonna make your decision based on letters that were written on April. 21st. Nobody reviewed the site With 1.18. Like a stacked deck. In other words, most people, we had no opportunity to offer any rebuttal. Second, if you peopl,.,,e, you don't realize its the speed limit. It isn't crossing ah ah signalized crossing. The speed limit is 20 mph o I can show you all kinds of inten;ections that on Pacific Highway where its 40, 45 and trucks are driving onto it. Ab 20 mph you can stop pre-b 7 darn fast, They have 90 feet between the two tracks. You 're making it sound as if we 're going into dh an alley way there, It's 90 feet. \ - TEPEDINO Ah, Mr. Skourtes, ah, I think iit8 time the public bearing ir closed and ah __,.,-- „,e,z....„ „„...,.._ c, _ . ..,,,..7_, ,,, ,,„7._ ,, _, I r Page 20 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-70) TEPEDINO: Do I hear a motion ah WOOD: I move for denial, ah ah for denial to the appeal, , denial on the minor land petition based on the following findings of fact: - - (inaudible) That the that the exit the available the only available access as far as was arranged by applicant, would be unsafe. Reported proof of this subhAtted facts ah be by the building department by the planning department, by the police department, by th,,',! city administrator, all concluded upon examination that the access would be unsafe. The Tigard planning commission in consideration of applicznt's plan for building the filled drive ah the excess, , . . (inaudible) also concluded ah that the excess would be unsafe in the following fashion. Ah a vehicle exiting at the side would have limited visability to the right. It would seem unlikely to be able to see the entire body of the car or other vehicle approaching from the right that a ah that a truck making a right turn onto through the turn can either would enter to Bonita would. also enter into the left hand lane, that a that the city could not permit the left hand turn for entering into the left hand lane at Bonita. That oars approaching or other vehicles approaching Bonita from the right have limited viibiliby ah into the site and would run ah ah danger of striking vehicles entering the left hand lane from the site. Ah the ah conclusiona ry findings of planning commission while accepting the. . . . 4 value of ah findings of the public utilities commission and others on safety and access ah ah ah must form its own conclusion on this matter for purposes including minor land partition. TEPEDINO: Was that your motion? oe WOW). Yes. TEl The motion on the floor. Second TEPEDINO: It's been moved and seconded, Is there any further discuSsion? SPEAKER: Ah, Mr, Chairman, ah since you deny this ah obviously . 1 . — (inaudible) . What I'm wondering is what this site, how the site can be used Obviously as land gets scarcer going to have to be used sometime. And what I'm wondering is ah ah what that pr perty can be used for. TEPIDINO: Mr. Speaker, I appreciate your ooncern, but I think that the to state the use of the property at this time would be speculative and conjeotive. So think this would be the proper form to raise as you go over appeals for (inaudible) . I just saying that. . . . . (inaudible) . [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] N � Page 21 (Appeal Conditions Use MLP-5-78) TEPEDINO: Ah Motion made and seconded. Any further discussion. I 'll call for the question. All those in favor of denial for the reasons presented by Commissioner Wood and especially by Commissioner Brian signify by saying Aye. DENIAL UNANIMOUS p" 1 , 4 ' w . . .o :r F 1 ' 1 .Wyp'--- ...•+.w.W ..M m"+' 'm,.am.:mn.�,rrq, e.°y, ...,^ .. A ,... .. ..... ... ..... ..,n ^ 5 m� 7 r, .1 � I we• • r�",. •• X e��+xi a aw%>•�^��ai�„"w'Xnr��ai�i 11.-�'A�a-y^A ua i",�1,;rrii� :. � .'6;r a� ' �",';is JI n'.opSm,:7�ur" rp'.Yd U'•«-�' ' , a I . ,n r a ..-.r<i, �.... vla ..Ar Y• Y wr,." i, -+ I.,' : -F r h�l y�', f,'o W.o ♦ ,fir „1 a, I+a l " v ,I l A , .F.„'y,,"aft i4 a:et�WYd>"uiar"�a a�..::rI" W•..d w. r '1 �Y'. +C:rNwr�. '7pj'�p,eR� + n �•S, 4' . r .i(` yah Y y �Y, '4� ' a','i.•R.1 4'r�xnN."it.A,�nmr.4,w+i1u.� ..i:r R.,. 4Y'r .. rr.,. i; 'N.d+ �.�'.`a' .'I' , F.7:1,t o ,. �7^ a pp, t,.S Y 1Y1.:j r'♦' + .14. )„ . net ' 4y' C a 11 +�j , 1n. ,1Y .nn r ,w .�+.:.k W•brx,rv.a I t'4'Sr `Y , r e.u!:w:'1+•} Y�•r'A1i i +�lr,%+.�M+��'pYkRm f,3�fikr'M 1♦rv"tb,+ M''',Ml `ru�'.ir c�1.�,-... is�;t' •�F'r,..w Ya. x.Jr'.8 r.� - .- .�1, I .r'1 .,... .A.e"N:.tlr::to yt�kYr,w^,� A�ab>�"y�y'r��) f " a �i I '' r r,� p 17 1 it �xkn ir, r n •, :a�f: W 2t Fr;a,F 1'.Y�.V ISM 11 A�e - . , .Yr .,� .a ! ' : ,t• � i, y , rpr •.. .. n ,r Y. .. . �. ? 4 r'4.', W I � sC ,+ r a n.rj 1:m �as CIS + 1 "�� .«..4"'r'r.i,F'R+-y S,dKI•.N14.YlxX,...1.. . '1,i ote f,u;; gg w web :i<Sr G..d' dY.,a l,a u..�4 r 1, 'i"P «rr;r✓ .r,:7 r�«�'��,�� ��� �ar.x'4'4 F rCM. 7ku 'Yy�1!3'�y`1'r t4��``i F}}1 w 4� „r Ly•�r°w'�:{y w,1.1 Vrilid lmtl'wM Y(���rN�`uYl�..°{Wp�;�f,� IYW. " aaw W M M la 7:1. dir+ 4• r Y �•:r .yyy• ,,�((', ryr YSr:^' p./+f'�� .,�'r17�p;'.}'�`� ;1r,�n�°��ry�` � � 4M "t' .rye' �' ;Ai` ��yrygM x tf',y.'�'d 'YM yp�MlIT M¢�v'gMy�R�IIM'� 'I ' flAkarMW �,1�r9,rUi I'Yi w . y ro!'� r F 1 iM • " .X W Y17 rY", « w v CI a ,aa M r 1 � IIYY��pp,�I!=� Y��'�, �{y�, �,,y"{�1 y p '`�{�¢ ry ,�k�1y1�•�,�5 t�yr.�y y I �p 'r I 'i, he�i�iQr�t%b"l1,:a Y,4✓NM '�w'�1�.P>I��1 (41U 1♦'.�.�S�N S+rN.l�'','a�e�4, �.�rA'V.;O`7�;irY� n.�N�;:1W„+f'l:Jr'Srr1'w�sr r t. ,41-319, ,Pa qi t rM +; 4} A().4011 7 I w ” J m•w.YpuwwM'MykvEM wwlk"tmrrY'�Ynwf'.Y°rarbX:IM,a+ent',wffih+f,�,xs tir,ac:a.la,a¢,xwn+a,,,,,,r :r,,',m„w..lrwua+..a..++rpru.,nr.:,w': r,wrr,+ru.kwn+*a:•u,aa�+w.ada,.::lke,•e:Xwm.>�r wXM ''��y� q�wwritirsYrslYaapq(kdUwr�,'rHtuC^+wR•.a><I,itivp♦1x:.Y.",.�Y,,.ou I I .�,.� '' ,'w.mr,rJµ.�rrr dnr.,a.m,nr ra nn e..,";.rr ....r..R,.,.. ,i •' ,n, .'�,,,:. .. ..., , ., .. .... �1.. ,. ... ' .. .. CITY OF TIGARD--12420 S.I. .AAIN—TIGARD,OREGON 97223 �/ �IECEIPT 2t— - 7 b AMOUNT:$ DATE:�..__._ 1,'// -"J "" " DOLLARS NAME: _s_ 22.4,7-../..../k„, ADDRESS: ."'"v . .. .wf. ' 1 6 9 2 0 S #CF FOR: ACCT.# PERMITS SURCHARGE AMOUNT SEWER BILLINGS 40-364 $ • '1 BUSINESS LICENSE 05-331 PLUMBING PERM" 05-332 $___.__ MECHANICAL PERMIT 05-332 BUILDING PERMIT 05-333 SEWER CONNECTION 40-363 SEWER INSPECTION 40-365 SYSTEM DEV,CHARGE 25-366 PARK DEV,CHARC-;E 30-367 PARK DEV.CHARGE:#2 30-3623 ZONING ADJUSTMENTS 05-362 _ At • TPTALS $� .$2 BY: RECEIVED I PERMIT HUMORS ASSIGNED: !uttrr!er Amount fumboir A,ririal t dumber Amount $, u_____ � _.. _ $ _ $, � 11ECEIPT # 0 , :: AI l't ali "'? #' , 4 National Safety Company d Y} ' 7 Route 1 Box 575r Beaverton, Oregon 97005 ., Recorder �` c i Vt. AUG i�E „ Doris H rtig, Au;u,.,t 1, 19 76 31978 ri.ty of Tiga:xr•r, �` ' 12420 S.0, ".as n Street 1I I Tiny. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Deer Mrs TTsrtiq : .. Please direct a lett' r to our company within a week spelling out the findings of the Planning Commission) reference (5-78) 25 July 78 meeting and reason or reasons for their decision. In accord no,:.. with the appeal provisions of the Tigari Munioip `' Code, please consider this cls notice of app-14,..1 by this company of .� the denial by the City Planning Commission of application for rati flotation and or approval of Taal: Lot 4000, 4 The reasons for this appeal include the foot that the record and findings do not support the action taken. The Company does not in tend to wai 4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Verbattm Minutes For 2S, 1978 f • App57.77-Or.ditional Use MLP-5-78) (John Skourteil- - National Safety Company TEPEDINO May I have the applicants presentation please. , -- ANDERSON: I 'm Fred Anderson, chairman, speaking on behalf of the National Safety Company. I know that this, has been a little contention et City Hall for some time and until all personalities ah involved with this case I would want to ask your', for this body to decide how we get them whereas we must look at the merits of the problem.them, one of the reasons I am going to somewhat more than I really wanted to is that I hove a number of exhibits here that want to put it ) on the record. . . . . (inaudible our purpose is to resolve our administrative remedies in this case if necessary and I want thr,, record to be complete for that reason, and I have in ,11.y hand Exhibit 1 which I've marked, as you know you folks have it always marked at the top of exhibits, and I'll tell you that. . . . . (inaudible) it is; Exhibit 1 is a document which comprises a lease and the signing of the lease, and a platt. The plait is of the tract in question. I have a note of the platt which I will put in separately from this. This lease was formalized in 1966 by Southern Pacific Company, William M. Miers, an individual. It was enforced, as I understand, up to and including the National Safety :,,=pany's ownership. As a matter of fact, it was sig1 by the National Safety Company's as of the summer of 1977. This authorized and permit the use of the property for the storage purposes. I might bring your attention to the fact that the proposal now by National Safety Company is also using the property for storage purposes. The difference being that one is on the inside. This on the inside storage, and he other pre-existing was outside storage. The ah, I'd like to pass these over and I like to have them be made k port of the record for future referenoe. Now in order to facilitate an understanding as we go, I have here O, kickoff of an . . . . . (inaudible) attached to Exhibit I marked as Exhibit A, and it shows that this lot is 155 feet wide and the most southerly extremity, 45 feet wide at most northerly extremity, and extends a maximum of 505 feet along the Oregon Electric right of way and 478 feet along the Southern Pac.ific right of way. Now there's been some discussion on the (digress a moment) that this is a part of the right of way. This is not • • 'a ti 1 Page 2 (App.eal; Conditional Use M,,P--5--78) This is not part of the right- of way. It never has been a part of the right of way. The right of way, of ,; Southern Pacific I assume, was this highway--the land over the tracks--established from Oregon, California, New Orleans, and wherever rou go, This track for these many years (inaudible) probably number at least (inaudible) haven't been used for other than, for rail- road purposes and therefore is not taking n.g into consider- , ation . . . . . (inaudible) right of way using the piece of ' • °' , land that, as any other piece of land would be. Now we have here in my hand Exhibit II which is a right to sale deed, a description thereby Southern Pacific Transportation, Company convey this fact that were under • '• search here at the National Safety Council as of January 1978. And I have here Exhibit III which is a double or two items attached together, ah in the light rye of this . . . . . (inaudible) here, including a lot of go around, we 'll try talking about different about water, fire protection, and so on. Now I don't think there 's anything in our present situation here that requires ° you folks to be concerned about those elements. But since it tame up previously, I went to do what I can "•d: to enlighten the record, and ah I suggest to you that these matters could be better treated between these • ether than . . . . . (inaudible and the applicants important part of the argument here. But so that we will have an understanding what this is about, this is a letter '' from the . . . . . (inaudible) James Company, concerns • insurance brokers and their consultants. To the ' + Supervisor of Public Protection Department of Insurance Service of Oregon in Portland: I am writing on behalf , of our client who t s currently constructing an all steel building in the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District. The building, when completed, will be occupied by two light hazard tenants with each space occupying 5,000 square feet. This building has been located on the south side of the Southwest Bonita Road and along the Southern Pacific and Burlington i'orthern Railroad tracks. . The tenant fire hydrants are within 500 feet of the building, but these hydrants are located. on opposite sa:de of the railroad traclts from buildin. But these will be effective pend: n.g when a fire inspect on protection rating of this building caused by placement of these hydrants. The answer from the insumnce sevvices office, which ia. become part of ofsthe ratingfbureau, as we know it, based on your rating Y 6 V p ;r protecting property of h: rants �. 0 �C .�.�. the �+0 located south of Bonita Road, near ,.4th Street, between the two railroads, the applicable 2nd ofass would be ,R class 4., This including the actual proposal distance ' . hudrar�ts tol3athlofswh�chfet from either ''hydrant pump, 0 a y are situated across the railroad .•.—.t..• .a.*r,.;.,:i. ,.,::r: .........ra;xxz„niy+ ,m::a.::• , Pre . ' .. Page 3 (Appeal Conditional Use MLP-5-78) 0 • tracks. This applies solely for our rating aid information v. . grading nformation in the form, and for the purposes intended. May I ask 0400 . (inRudible) reply repeat, . that the building this has this is assumes that a fact. . Now I have in my hand Exhibit No. 5. It's on the letter here of the Public Utilities Commission of Oregon, dated March 9, 19784 Although, it's addressed to Mr. : Skourtes, I suggest to you that that is immaterial, because the National Safety Company has other people , on loaL to stockbrokers. . . . . (inaudible) . And it says, please refer to your letter received March 1, 1978, concerning your desire to construct a driveway • to the entrance to property located between the bridge crossings at the Bonita Road and the South Pacific Transportation Company and the Burlington Northern Inc. Previously, we said there was no objection to the construction of such driveway providing a no left turn sign is installed on the south post of Bonita Road. It is our understanding that such sign be installed . before any vehicle or traffic makes ube of such new i roadway. Should the nature of the use of said lane change '-'-.. the future, the Public Utility Commissioner . H H has a -t and obligation to insure the safety of the motori &Jublic using said roadway. The purpose I'm sugges ig with this will show that these other folks , who have., who have the ah jurisdiction of the state , . the fact that. I have in my hands Exhibit No. 4, a . Washington County driveway construction application permit No 804A that while I can't very well read, Ube form to you, it does say that the pn-mit is granted and right of way proposed to construct a driveway above noted address. The address is listed here. . . . . (inatidible) . ,. Applicant believes to construct said driveway to Washington County standards and specifications driwiray construction. Signed by Sam—Somebody? (Writing is aboub as bad as mine) . Now as you're well aware, there was a staff report issued in ah April 27, 1978, that when is had been read it was denied. Ah I want to say now that you asked that . . . . . (inaudible) . I'm not going to argue the (inaudible) , but Mr. Davies argued with me. Ah I'm flattered that he 's here and can . . . . . (inaudible) regarding lease. Now . . . t . (inaudible) he 's asking for anything, but you need the property for an opportunity . . , . . (inaudible) a highly expensive process . . . . . (inaudible) procedures. To continue use of property for a legitimate pu-Tose. No zone Change. Those don't change. No conditional use,, Not1aing. This issue , . . . . (inaudible) 0. K. Now, the property was used for storage before, is going to be used for storage again. The storage, 1 might suggest to you the use of it does not load the school classroom ,,, P. . , . 17 •• . . 0 •4'''1.. .• " 4, Page 4 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) , 0 , . . . . . . (inaudible) the problems today, ah, the school di3trict announced that they're going to float a bond issue to take care of additional kids. Ah, every school gets loaded up. Now here 's a chance to get / some property on the tax roles without adding any school ' .4 children to it. And you may just well leave that . . . . . (Inaudible) lot more of it because of this llg% limitation of a. . . . . (inaudible) li% of this property ' 0 taking a conservative view would ah 3120,000 would be Y what, li% would be about 1,200 dollars and 1,800 . dollars. To tax money that is available to augment the burden, public burden without any added burden on the , ' on the ah facilities. Now ah, I suggest to you that's a worthy objective, and I want to comment briefly on the comment or two made on the ah Etaff report. Now I know ah, I've been told by more than one that that a . l . .,,e bit of enmity between personalities involved (barr me I might add) as afar as . . . . . (inaudible) , so . I want you to look at this thing for what's good for the public. 0.K, What's your public problem? I 4 ' don't see any public problem. I looked, at this area. I I 've been familiar with it. I lived in Tigard except for 15 years ot of state for a number of reasons, and I was an taxpayer, and I'm ore of them too. I would say that is a justifiable use. I'd say it's one that # should be approved in order that we can get as much tax base from those facilities as do not add to the tax burden, and this is an opportunity. Now, the matters that were stated here, many .iings that are stated in this report are, what were saying, ah, extra curricular. They don't follow the annals, of the city at all, cause they're brought together, in any opinion, ah, and I'm, ah, . . . . . (inaudible) to give the applicants as much problems as possible. I as you to disregard those things, including the thing on the state line and do what you do for anyone else. Now, one other aspect I of the matter, spose you may have looked at it, that is that 2 is a sharp gradiant from the public street d.11 to the back of the lot. Now it was mentioned With einphasis in the staff report what the minutes with this. Well, 1 olan show you a great number o2 lots in Tigard that have a road. , , . . (inaudible) with a title to the street which has been set back lot as any other but , youlve got to got to the lot. Back lots have a narrower access route and 50 feet of road is considered to be sufficient. And even though a less or greater amoun"; is required to build one. So in this case, you look at the plant, you 'all see that there is plenty of room to put the building proposed here and have a wide driveway out to the street. No question out it . 8econdly, this is subject to design semioes . . . . . (inaudible) . . . , . (inaudible) . . . . . Those matters, 0 , '1 4 Page 5 (Appeal: Conditional Use MP-5-78) landscaping and so forth, and set back, an an set back legally, set back actually will come out in that sense, But there is a gentlemen here who is an engineer, who has an been concerned with this project for some time and I'd like to ask him, to tell you what his plen, or what is being done, will be done, with respect to the access, which seems to be one of the elements of concern, and nustifiably so, in your sphere. So if he would, I will call him up in just a moment, I so another point • or two that I have neglected. Now, sewage is available immeftately to this property. I will lend my hand, in iact I would be willing to put in that I dind't intnd to deny it, and we need it for our record that I would, ah, be willing to turn it over within ah preerty of subject applicant and that from the unified sewerage agency which seys in effect that ah a set out would be 4. provided with property and ah connection we made to the sewer that's going through, that area and through this tract and ah they'll be usual detention 2forage. I also have a letter here, from Washington County which PIT:grtlagogiTSLT4-ebyhtlni to proper-by. :r1s.j..ne 0 The property, this tax lot being mentioned, was omitted from Washingt= County asseesment role for 78, 79 tax year. Please be advised that acoording to the conditions of the NPO #7. . . . . (inaudible) , the table was 11.2. ,L (Tape gap) Now ah I know there might be some feeling that ah a deed hasn't been given because of the ,lommittee, the tax lot hasn't been created, because ypu all know of the little. . . . . (inaudible) not this right of way • property is taxed on the highest level in the state, of the state department of revenue. Assessors cut the tax . . . . . (inaudible) back, so this is a now an opportunity for this piece to get on Washington County tax roles . . . . . (inaudible) , but I want to mention one other point in that context, now this is a unique case. • I think counsel ought to . . . . . (inaudible) after that letter where he admits this is a unique case. It's • unique in the sense that the use of it for the purposes heretofore, see they, predate particition ordinance is partician law, and a'A. it's unAque in the sense that this use not been addressb-t now that it is property that is apart from the mil right of way, yet can ah pass on the highest level and has already made into partitioning attributes to the thee many years. So I like you to consider all those points and do what, I think I believe is in the laublic jnterest. If there 's property on the tax roles latn with a building on it, helps support our public present needs. I ask you to 11 concur, to look forward and fill a slot with these applicants citien to delay any concern about the Page 6 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) applicants. ENGINEER: What we 've basically done and I'm not really sure it belongs in this meeting, at this point. . . . . . (inaudible) , := But what we ?:9ve is if you'll look at that . . . . . (inaudible) portion SPR an Duri N RR here, what we have down here is the porfile, keeping in mind that your horizontal distance is as compared to the vertical distance is . . . (inaudible). What we 're planning on doing is filling this area that here now exists with probably two feet or more in this area then bring it up to same grade as the Bonita Road at that point. At any point there wouldn't be the maximum distance from the ah site distance from the ah 40 feet parking on the right hand side of driveway. Always which we drive right hand side. (inaudible) O.K. On the centerline to driveway you'd be on the righthand side. There 'd be no more than 2 feet maximum elevation change between • the driveway and the top of road. A Volkswagen is 42" side by side, so there 's -eally no problem seeing over the railroad access. QUIMBY: How much fill are you talkinL; about? . . . , (inaudible) 00 pioce of property because that's the way we used to ENGINEER: Miss Grant, we 're bring up. QUIMBY: And that's petty, that's pretty deep. What kind of a fill are you talking about? ENGINEER: USA is bringing the fill up. QUIMBY: Oh, that's interesting. ENGINEER: With materials left' over from the excavation of the, it's a waste material after we haul if off. QUIMBY: In other words, ah Unified Sewerage Agency, which is us, we 're the taxpayers we 've been supporting this for • years and seeing, no benefit fr(ga it rnce again will be sibsidizeda ENGINEtRg No, no. Wel7e been paying about $35.00 per yard to get that material to haul it off. The National Safety •4 Company is acutally doing the service for this projeot. QUIMBY: But you still haven't told me how much fill that Will require, ENGINEER: I would suspect about 60 yards. SMITH I have a question. What is the prime width on the 1 1 - . • - . Page, 7 Appeal: Qonditional Use MLP-5-78) ,P Bonita Road between the two railroad right of ways? ENGINEER: Between the ',No? , . UNIDENTIFIED: 90 feet ENGINEER: There 's 35 feet from the center line to the Burlington Norther, 30 feet driveway and 25 feet from the Burlington li■ driveway to, the SPR. H 1 ' WOOD: 90 feet to the railroad track to railroad track not the n. k.ight of way edge the right of way edge. -. ,,, ENGINEER: Right of way edge to right of way edge is 45 feet, 1 WOOD: 45 feet in front of the parcel. 4‘. SKOURTES: 45 feet, , ENGINEER: We have an ex-ora, there 's an C. ' ,.ta 15 feet dedicated id 4 , bank there. C TEPLDINO: Is there any other questions? SMITH? I have a few auestions for Mr. Anderon, but. ,, . . . (inaudible) I'm not real sure ebout the ah - (inaudible) the basic stats, whether they were seen or lost. . . . . (inaudible) ah 6,000 square feet in a 60 feet minimum lot with, but , .k these requirements are applicable to rectangular lots, .. and not necessarily law, and not necessarily odd shaped ;- lots as we 're dealing with here. Ah there 's a statement . in there that the ah that the, that we 'd be getting int6 a hundred year flood plain zone ah southern portion of the lot. That's '1rue, but we 've got a boxed area we .,: °A0 11 aim to work on to about 50, 75 feet beyond the buildim. because it's a severe..drop. 8 or 10 feet walk up. Ah like I say, I think the staff reporter thought tha t. it was, I oan't tell whether these ah are actual statements of fact or whether ah at that time they were in violation. That's all. TEPEDINO: 0J'C, Thanks. I think before we ask additional 11 questions, I'd like to proceed to ah any other proDonen±S and ah and ah then go on to opponents and ask the city attorney to represent us on some of those comments and then we 'll go on to questions. BAILEY: Is there anything that you have to ask? , .,' ; 1 , WOOD: There 's briefly for the record to clarify a few points, ah I'll figure out later whether theylre relevant or not. The ah when for th.',.? first time was this parcel . Separately recorded? And ha S had separate legal owner- ship? , ( ........._... . w.a. oldhmm, *....,..arctexim,P. Page 8 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5--78) ANDERSON: Well, ah B title ownership? WOOD: B title ownership, ANDERSON: As far as I ',know B is the transfer of title. WOOD: Does ah did was has have ai.y previous buildAng permits i been issued for the land? v ANDERSON: I think not, WOOD: And ah am I correct in that when I was out there, the 1. n,d was cle .;, is is has the the former I the Former owner discontinued any use of the land? • ek ANDERSON: Ah well let me WOOD: I sorry leas-:e former leasee. ANDES'"-,OAT: Let me ask Mr. Skour ter3„ Mr. Skourtes, was that the former owner, Mr. Iyer? KOtJRT'ES: Still using accommodations there. WOOD: Is ah I I I is was the former leasee any predecessor of interest to the present party. By that, is were the precleccssor company or or or was there any common otivnership, 4 r'`' ANDERSON: Its a corporate ,own.ership how, you mean? WOOD: Yes. ANDERSON: I ,.(100,,,,,:I i;hin� so,. +'or years it was an individual, and I believe he s s the oa�e we talked. to WOOD That 's all. SMITH: �'dhat is it being, used for now'? I ANDERSON: Storage Jf WOOD: Pardon. Its still being used for the same purpose at this ti',ne? I SI OiURTES Yes, there'd be about a $50,000 still selling used III machinery. WOOD Well, I wen±. up there, ah over the weekend I sl.ippose and except fora bulldozer that seemed to have been involved I. in pushing some ground around, I didn't see any machinery on the site. Is anything presently going in here? SKOtfl TES: Well, eh with the extensive pieces ire have had, I hven't ' k ' , . Y. . c 1 eu ....... \NJ / Page 9 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) , d , (inaudible)been (inaudibly) at the lot. * n There 's been a lot of scrap there, that's been accumulated. Exposed out in the building area. If \ you 1001; there ah the laymen, ob I was wonder:oag . . . . . (inaudible) unless you're in this type of business, I I doubt that there 'd more than $4,000 there. 4 WOOD: Materials. SKOURTES,, Yes. No building materials. Specially not ah sometimes we have more . .1 ANDERSON Well I wanted t(1 ask, at least to exhibit to I would . . like to bring back to determine to into the city record \ or tho record of your case. . '' '1.....4 1/4 ALDIE You'll get them back -- guaranteed. i TEPEDINO: 18 there any, ah additional testimony forthcoming from proponents. Mr. Attorney again, do you want to add? 4 SI<OURTES' Pe. like to reserve my ah commeAts (inaudible) for rebuttal at the: end. TEPEDINO: You may need not rebuttal. . SKOURTESr. Well, I hope there isn't, 4 AL ;. 1 11 BAILEY TEPEDINO: Are there any proponents, ah on this issue? O.K. I'd : like to call on Mr. Bailey. I think we could start (laugh) you did talkiLF about my involvement. I feel like I have tu say something ah but I only been involved in discussing first with Fred and , then with Mr. Skourtes several vimes tether Mr. Skourtes 1 had to go through a minor land parti+ionirs process at $ , all. And I assume that's not an iSsue here. They're ,,,,, 1.. they're here. If that's a, if thatte an issue why, ah, they still ha lr. that issue in mind why they'll pass that , issue along another way. And I think that what they're asking me to do minor land partition I never asked, and I haven't really been involved in it. WOOD: Mr. Bailey, can I e you about a statement you -11.1,st made for if you'll read the code stated that a non-rectangular lot on a nollective street 1.0 not have to meet the front- age requirements of a recta-igular lot. Do you concur in h 1)1 that ' , . BAILEY: 1 didn't do anything about that problem until tonight , r- 0 . . . . :. (inaudibie) while 1 Was sort of coning up here, and ' the lanFuage is minimum lot width ah. It doesn't say minimum frontage if you don't have long enough to time to , sete if *there was som0 place in the code where that ,.. i .,,, _ , ,,_,,,„ : :, ..._ ,7,,s__ ,,,_, : ., . , .'-•ty . • . ' , . t. % Page 10 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) language can be converted 80 as to mean minimum frontage. If there 's nothing specific in the code that's used to mean minimum fontage Then I think language minimum lot width would not prohibit this use of this site .• because that would mean that if you ever had a call it's . ., • not certain that was is than 60 feet long you'd be in trouble. k • WOOD: Could, could I borrow your book? ' • BAILEY: It is No 18.38, .. , , HOWARD: 030 subsection 2 , I My understanding, I just want some clarification because , it is a legal point, lot width means horizontal distance ' between lot side lines ordinarily made in parallel with front yard lines. Define front yard lines me,---Ins the lot lime and lines separating the lot from either street or A streets other than an alley. And side line means any lii.lo connecting a front or rear lot line. The reason I P _ am asking this is that it appeared to me from reading , thee definitions that width meant the the the front. BAILEY: O.K. Well, that's 'what I did find and now that you found that it does. . .I'd like to look at it. ' WOOD: Its a significant , , BAILEY: Parallel to the front line, it still doesn't say its parallel to the front line, but it doesn't say that's what we 're measuring. It does 6tsem to be. . . . . (inaudible) . I- doer seem to say that if you've got a distance jaorter than 60 feet on some line other than a line , parallol to a front line, 3,ou'd bo alright, bi.,,t surely 1+ doesn't mean that you couldn't for example have a broken line in front. See the problem of the with using width as a meaning the same as front line is that , it brings under the --)overage that prohibition a whole , set of things you have word had a line that shape. I'm afraid that would be a width. 3- WOOD: Which is the right of the road? ' BAILEY: Well, either the road is $, . WOOD: What would you think width mean ? , BAILEY: I think if you have a lot that was not at any point when measured parallel to the road, if you had, a lot that would nowhere accommodate a line 60 friet long parallel to the road that would be prohibited. And I think also if you have a lot 6hat would be in an area that didnt have an area that was large enough to build and , 1 . , . ., , . _ . . Page 11 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) _ :. '..-, otherwise anowable building given the set, back, that tl would have to in that space a place to accommodate a line FPo 60 feet long parallel to the, :'oad. A, WOOD: Would be ah, is that, tract been the wording be minimal .t lot width would be 60 feet? f, ,4140 BAILEY: Well, unless you can get to the word front, I don't think , '1 there is any interference with their application at all. . Because they obviously have more -ban 60 feet of width , r,..„ for an area much larger than would be necessary for many allowable developments. A WOOD: I'm not sure the one you drew wouldn't fall in you wouldn't take it across for a long way because lot width • is horizontal side lot lines ordinarly measure parallel to the, and that ordinarily might indeed indicate in this one that the perpindicular side lot lines wouldn't . be, parallel That's right. , • . BAILEY: I never could make anything out of it. I've heard an q. , „,_ awful lot about all this ah feeling that is talked about k and have forseen an early statue for it and am aware of . this I talked to Mr. SkeiTtes many times about this problem and ah I've never been able to rack a conclusion about the meeting of the 60 foot line group that I thought 4 . resolved the problem . . . . . (inaudible. ) ., KOOD: Well, I'm through. 4 * TEPEDINO: Well, other comments from the city. A 4, . • BARKER: Well, I agree with most of the comments made by Mr. SkaurtQs and his attorney Fred Anderson especially the fact that I e2;ree to place this property on the tax., roles that would be beneficial to all of us. Still I feel I should point out why the city , why the staff, and I feel I should point it out because the sted (' is gone that it t would be a problem, it would be the application. The ,4 staff had a general concern, as' they met with me on several occasions about, this we have had numerous meetings wlth Mr, Skourtes. The genuine concern that they had was for safety rules. It's true that you could solve the problem, I agree with the engineer who said he could solve the problem r getting in and out of the property by filling because the there is substantial drop off from Bonita to the property. The concern we had was the vertical align- ment with Bonita and should have in the folder there a report from the police department who among others expressed 4 their concert when the officers spent some time down there as did the chief. o . . . (inaudible) fireman observing traffic in that area and placing the patrol cars and squad cars - , . . . Page 12 (Appeal: Conditional Use MP-5-78) in different areos and observing what happened as cars come over the tracks and on and their concern was with traffic coming out of the subject's property onto the Bonita Road. Someone would come over the the ' (inaudible) and turn little warning and they'd have an accident at the tracks or with other vehicle coming out of the property. They also had concr?rn about the ability of a large truck coming out of the crossing onto Bonita ; to be able to make that turn without going into the other lane of traffice, in other words they did not . . . . . (inaudible) would pretty well take up the street. So the safety item was the main concern of the staff. I felt that that should be pointed out. I think you also have a letter in there from the public works departmen-G (of the Washington County) where in they felt that this was a poor entrance that they considerd would be the Second or third choice that they would make as entrance into that on and they mentioned this problem with the vertical raignment with Bonita as a said thab at some futura time they feel that that street Fihould be improved. They roalize that it is a hazard. The staf2 felt but until such time as that is improved that this project, this request be denied. , TEPEDINO: Thank you yes the next part of the agenda is the cross examination and rebuttal, ANDERSON: Well, I'd like to ask Mr. Barker a few questions first. Mr. Barker, would you ah would you're position as you've now said that ah the . . ,, . . (inaudible) , BARKER: Continuous, yes, continuous. (inaudible) a sign , they wotid suggest reommending that a sign be placed there to say no left turn as you come onto it. That's somewhat is part of the problem that doesn't address the vertical alignment to me and people coming to and from 11 on Bcuita. . . . . (inaudible) it addresses the matter of coming out of the property onto Bonita. ANDERSON: One further question, Mr. Barker. BARKER: Well, I feel warmly. (laughter) ANDERSON: You're thought didn't, that this property of Ray Gorman to regrade the level, BARKER: Well, I wouldntt vRnt to particularly iX it was my property, see it ly dormant and I wouid want to see on the tax roles, but I also don't want to have any responG'ibility whatsoever for the death of anyone bhem because I conSider it to be a serious traffio hwoavd. ANDERSON: This is whioh crossing, both railroads, BARKER: Yes. • . - V Page 13 (Appeal Conditional Use MLP-5-78) And ah thicl be 'die turn for this traffio we use for 66th to 78th corner and are you aware or not that ANDERSON: No, and several times that I have been down there I know I have never seen anyone go in or out of that property. BARKER: But you said a truo% he Pieces of pipe and so forth are oust lying the:re on the ground don't contribute to the traffic, whereas the use of the thing proposed to my mind would. There would be as large, it's a warehouse) I assume there 'd be a lot of trucks coming and going. Now I don't see why it would generate more than two or three oars a week. ANDERSON: Well, would it be above all reason that if it is a ge-b-birig at Mr. Barker,, you're an:u=1Vion:liAlrgrou permits you to deny this petition hereby relegating the property for all kinds of uses because we know that . . . . „ (inaudible) and there's been no change in that crossing and I'm not aware of anybody getting killed at that orossing, but why, because they have policement who travel that road . . . . . (inaudible) using extra caution under the circumstances and we have many many hazards so I want to rebut. My point is thls. That we know from common sense that this grade crossing two of the rie:It there, and that the next intersection where 72nd comes in those are all. . . . . (inaudible) everyone of em, . . . . . (inaudible) and I suggest if. I may Mr. . 6 . . . (inaudible) that Center Street inaudible) cross the interection with Greenbury. . . . (inaudible) they get killed evexy morning, why, because you allow the people oil the south, . . . . . (inaudible) which can't possibly even see without getting out in the middle of the street. But what I'm getting at is that we should have a safety problem at every corner if there's going to be a denial of use of property because of some possible hazard, That would perhaps apply to many nany problems in Tigard if I may say so, Many areas, Lid so I suggest that that is is not in fact to be consideYed in this petition. TEPEDINO Thank you Liri Anderson. SKOURTES: My name is John Skourtes. However, I -want the members to Ld aware that Bonita Road is a county road and I don't know if you're familiar you don't just go in there and say put up a 250 bond and pay the $10 to get a driveway through thar . Now we have had to show the county, now this is county road now its not a city road, A that wil*,n we 're going to fix the grade up there's not going to be any rnpre acnidents than any other driveway, Now any of you, ladies and gentlemen who have viewed the - 0 ' 1 Page 14 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) site, you noticed a driveway there now, right? The state and highway department going to removed the guard rails and changed them. The guard rails were there to protect the railroad station because the railroad station •.9111 was put in with federal money. The guard rails were returned because the station's torn down now. Now once we fill the grade, my engineer said the lowest point the lowest point from that incline from the highest point of the Bonita Road is going to be 24 inches. 24 inches, even if you had a little scooter down here, I mean the concern of the city was that somebody's, coming out of that driveway and you have a high hump up here, right? You can't see, The car coming this way can't see you. • But 24 inches is, nothing. So this hazard ia ovvious the f6.ct is you're going to loan us money unless we gonna fix that site. Imeanah I and my group as investors we 're not gonna have a hazard in there. We can't ren-b the place. We'd go broke. We 're aware of that We've tried to ah, the reason this really got off kilter was the staff never reviewed our plans, They came up, they asked these various individuals for letters like the policeman and the highway department, and then they issued a denial, we didn't have have one chance, not even one minute to review any of their points with them before issuing their denial. We could have explained some of these things to em. . But you all the letters that they sent out to water district, policeman, etc. etc. , most of the letters are dated April 21st and time was running out. They assured me they would review this in about two weeks in March. The statues says you have 60 days. They were down to the last two weeks and had to come out with the report, and 4.1> the next thing I know, they deny us, They didn't even once look and see a review to see what we were going to \ do there. This is why this thing has gone on and on and on .ow, I can assure you were aware of a the grade there and as far as the Unified Sewage, we have a contract with National Excavators to put in the new 21 inch sewer line. And the contractor i6 giving us a bid. ff.t? has a 6 feet contract. He's the taxpayer. Anytime you trench in that's a 15 foot sewer that you put front half of the tract in gravel so of course you have to compact with . . . . . (inaudible) . Any questions? CORLISS: I have a question on one point. IS it all right to ask about the building? Nobody's asked anything about the building. TEPEDINO: Well, hes here about a landscaptng, but if you feel it's \1111 relevant to your point. CORLISS: It is to me. TEPEDINO: 0 E. q}' ,• Page 15 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) COR :SS: What are you using for a building and and do you have , tenants already? SKOURTES: Well, I hay one tenant. It's a 10,000 sq. ft. L shaped building. The building .ihere the building will be set in the lot ah see the railroad only sold us that strip plus they maintain 50 feet to their center of the track but I'm leasing it up to the bank so right where the building is we have here, the land is 74 feet wide but, of course we have another 20 feet so would be 94 feet wide and of course we go further back. We 're over 120 feet wide. The froirt,'; of the building will be 74 et . 0 . . . (inaudible) and 2n feet . . . . . (inaudible) The back is used for railroad cars. Does that answer your question? CORLISS: I ask you about the tenants also? SKOURTES: Well, one of the tenants is a sprinkler contractor. Most of our tenans of 5,000 feet parcels never have a lct of activity in that small a contractor. CORLISS: That would generate a lot of traffic would't it? You'd have to have the employee cl coming in and out, and materials delivered. SKOURTES: No, because the employees use the parking out at the job site, Fabricating shop. CORLISS: That's what I mean, but you wouldn't have to have employees coming into the shop t) do the fabricating, You couldn't have. . . . . SKOURTES: Well, I would venture. There 's only going to be two bathrooms there. You never know no what tenants, I would average the tenants would have thre,3 or four people. CORLISS: In other words your looking at some manufacturing though. As well as warehousing. It's not going to be storage of materials, there 's going to be some manufacturing. SKOURTES: Well, in all fairness, I don't know what's going to happen in the future when the uses we are governed by the NM P zone. . . . (inaudible) . Of course if we know no woo u. manufcnturing, because it would be a fire hazard. . . . . . (inaudible) would be low risk as far as fire. Thea building will not be sprinklered but ah in all fairness who ultimately rents it we might get some tenants but then your zoning ordinance controls it kind of client we get a it is . . . . . (inaudible) . 13.ut my experience has been th.at 5,000 squari,'; feut you won't . 4 , 4 , Page 16 ,,Appeal: Conditional 136e MLP-5-78) have that much activity. You don't have a lot of activity unless you have 30,000 square feet. TEPEDINO: Thank you Mr. Skourtes. Well, if there are no additional comments BAILEY: The ordinance Mr. Barker. Could you respond to the comments about the bill and reduction of the tra2in hazard. Would that information bear on what you say about the (inaudible) . I BARKER: My opinion to we can solve the problem is getting onto the Bonita Road . . . . . (inaudible) and back on to the . . . . . (inaudible) . That still does not solve the problem of the alignement and . . . . . (inaudible) still see. . . . . B, ILEY: inaudible) . What are the other options Mr. . . . . . (inaudible) . Have they (inaudible) . BARKER: The town mentioned some Mr. Howard. . . . . . The least desirable access point goes directly to 1 Bonita between the two sets of railroad trauks. We felt 4.the mo2t preferable access from Washington County's point of view would be south across the flood plain to an existing giravel d. iveway leading south from the spot. , The second most desirable access would be the private crossing below railroad tracks to 74th Avenue. The third e possible route would be the private crossing of the SPR tracks on the private property to an access to ,0 Bonita Road at the same location as on the existing access H abokt 350 East :',..0 SPR tracks. , TEPEDINO: I will now close the publi hearing of this petition, and 1 . call for the staff recommendation please. HOWARD: Staff rucommendation of Minor Land PetiJion 5-78. After , 1 lengthy and detailed studios of this matter, ataff . p I recommends that the Tigard Planning Commission deny , this appeal. T2PEDINO: Thank you Commissioners? Commissioner Speaker, do you want to comment on this? 1 SPEAKER': Mr. Chairman, I haven't read this whole report and I am brand new on the commission, but there seems to me that a4 awful lot of planning. . . . . (inaudible) that to my V .I:Tri3O,00!, at- I mind. , . . . (inaudible) and to me that's kind of peripheral. pli.,:ke7ithat. . . . . (inaudible) but ah. . . . . (inaudible) ion would br to say to th,a applicant that . . . . . (iaaudible) sir:la the staff aprarently feels there is real safety hazard and Washington County says that the least desirable access to this parcel through Bollj'bq ------7 r. , r ° ■ ■ ■ ,■ , . Page 17 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) , . . Road that the applicant on this application sbould , . . . (inaudible) . My inclination would be to agree with staff and what I would suggest to the applicant can they . i , not get a private crossing over the old Orggon Electric tracks and that 74th • . . . . (inaudible) . TEPEDINO: Commissioner Corliss, do you have any comments or ideas on this? i " CORLISS: I have no comment. - . • TEPEDINO: Commissioner Wood? WOOD: Yes. First, I just * . . (inaudible) very briefly. I've read through this file in which there was and if there wts bias shown it really doesn't come out in this file. It , •. was delayed in getting started, but most of the time - , during the delay it was a period in which the applicant 11 was alos contesting whether he should be goj.ng through a minor land partition at all, and I understand that doing great work with staff while the applicant' s c N denying it is even applicable to him and any of event ,, to get to the merit on safety. I would conovIr with the , staff and city administrator. Went down and took a look at the site Tried walking tn and out of it Tried . . standing 2 feet below the gvade of the street and seeing , what I could see. Uat.imateay my view is that recognizing what the PUC has done and ot.11rs I don't think they have - , jurisdiction over on our own judgement on w,kat to say in Tigard. The and my judgement as it is is that this is not , ( safe. I'll repeat why. The thing that impressed us coming our of the site. You must get right to the road even with an incline before you can see just any particular vision ., what's going on You Were way down on the tracks until you get near the road. You get near the (inaudible) . 111 WOOD: If your stopped and if you stop at that point and look at ah if it's in a car, rather than a truck and since cam's will be coming out, I was standing up higher than a high level car. Indeed you can see Bonita, but when you look at that dip to the right the best you f,lan do is see the top of the hood of a oar. You've got most of the car 11 hid and your visibility is restricted to R '4uch less likely to see someone Combine that are a couple of obvious problems the PUC says no left turn. How the city would hb enforce that beats me because that would be a private il way. If you turned right as narrow as Bonita is you c.Lia go into that left hand lane, It's virtually impossible for any size truck to avoid that the ah uh so coming out I think there 's there 's danger there. The real danger as the city administratOr points out if you,re coming from the right, coming toward that at least the guy coming out knows that knows the danger and can stop a little more carefully. Person coming over that track, -- best thing . ' the , II I , Page 18 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) they are going to see is especially with a oar coming out is maybe the top of the mof. And I think that coming over those tracks down in the hole, somebody else goes down in the hole frcm using the traoks, ail you're begginh for accidents. And I recognize that there are danger spots in Tigard, but I'm not anxious to create more of them. TE:s is a minor land partition is part of , an old railroad right ,f way. A strange 1, i located with , ., a strange access. One of the things to look at in a lot of land partitions is the access. And my view is that I I'm not so concerned you know about turning down a tax lot or allowing this to stay in State and be over the a railroad that I'd want to approve a petition is at least seems to me to have a various and significant and safety , hazards. - TEPEDINO: Thank you Mr. Wood, Commissioner Quimby, did you have , any ah comments? QUIMBY: None ,. TEPEDINO: Commissioner Brian? , L BRIAN: I think that the conditions that ah Mark pointed out ah 1.- depth er what I feel on it, sure we 're increasing the tax roles is good bilt I think we have to be se],ective in 0 . in how we do that ah it seems that the applicant allowing a hazard when a.o.other hazard exists, ah the police report does say that . . . . . (inaudible) . In their letter of April 22nd, and added to all the other comments ah ah, . . . (in- .. aidible) , but I think that. . . . . (inaudible) . • 0 , TEPEDINO: Commissioner Smith? • SMITH: Well, there ' one. It appears to me that that were not doing the pr:Lme industrial property, now It ran the two other railroad tracks. The shape of that property with the flood plaLri in the baok whJoh is normally. . . . . (inaudible) toward the land.. First I would not imagine a trucker turning 'a truck around in some positions of , that property. Ah it does not seem to lend itself well to a ah industrial or a ah warehouse site And ah on the side to the access problems ah in regard to tax benefits then they don't feel that what it does for our traffic situation is really relevant here, that is ah being based on merits of property in question, TEMINO: Commissioner, ah, Aossman, Do you have sny comments? 1 . AO8SMAN: Ya... I'm in favor of denial the appeal on the recommendation of staff. Ah, T8PEDINO: Five points for what I think you 're already heard, I've already beet down that road down pat the site several : . ■ ,- '. vi Page • 9 (Appeal: C: 'ditioual Use MIAP-5-78) -, . times ah today as a matter of fact, and the thing I nottice is that the trend that's Tigard as well as elsewhere in Washington County is trying to reduce the vortex of danger in . . . . . (inaudible) and, around railroad crossings, And I think the this, applica fu tion ah refutes would aggrevate . that. The danger up on that road crossing the road I think that that through there, up through there as a ,N, matter of fact is in violation, increase the activity that this very area would kinds aggreavate that. Also N, I'm a little concerned about access to the site, r H emergency vehicles to protect ',..,.he people there as well ...,./- the other questions about Lhe vortex of danger protection the street where ah passing by. I too would be in favor of denial of this. ,,, , TEPEDINO: Do I hear any other comments? Questions, or motions? , (Tape g&p)i SKOURTES The fellow that wrote the letter from the county, he's ,., the man who gave us the driveway permit, Mr, Morse, He 's - ' not concerned. Now it's obvious we're gonna spend, we 're , gonna, we 're gonna build a site, it's obvious. , i I mean you fellas a7.'e missing the point, and ladies. We 're gonna fill the site. Maybe you can't envision. , Mere 's not gonna bo a , it's not gonna be ah dangerous, It's gonna be 30 feet wide. You can turn a semi into it. The guard rails gonna be redeEigned. It's obvious, in I a other, words, ah, I think you should judge us on minor ) lend partition appeal. We haven't even gone in or design renewal for permits. We 're not asking for a variance, , , Ah, let me tell you, of course you shoulA not all. ah, -. the reason you have our access on that 1,,foperty is because • the state will not give you a crossing against Burlington Northern tracks. They will not give you any more private railroad crossings. You all saw the signs up here at ah as you go to Hillsboro, just is as is a private . , . crossing? Those are out. No more private crotLisings, In fact, they're selling that property because you have to cross a creek, you don't control a pl'operty. Then you III 6. sbi31 can't get a cer, : for it because you can't got across there. Now it disturbs me thab them, there 's . . you're gonna make your decision based on letters thr.A.t were written on April 21st. Nobody reviewed the site with us. Like a sacked deck. In other words, most people, we had no opportunity to offer any rebuLT41. Second, if you people, you don't realize it's the speed , , limit. It isn't crossing ah v.11 signalized crossingo The speed limit is 20 mph. I can show you all kinds of intersections that on Pacific Highway where its 40, 45 and trucks are driving onto it At 20 mph you oan stop pretty darn fast. They have 90 feet between the two tracks. 1. You're making it sound as if were going into ah an alley way there. It's 90 feet. , TEMINO: Ah, M:.:, Sko=tes, ah, I thinA i.t's time the public hear.;.ncr tp. is closed and ah , 4 _____ ,. , , Page 20 (Appeal: Conditional Use MLP-5-78) TEPEDINO: no I hear a motion ah WOOD: I move for denial, ah Rh for denial to the appeal, MiniZ roMptetition(=i12pre That the that the ex:L1 the available the only avartablo access as far as wail arranged by applicant, would be unsafe. P, ported proof of this submitted facts ah be by the building department by the planning department, by the police departmenb, by the city administrator all concluded upon e%amination that the access would be =safe. The Tigard planning commission in consideration of plan for building the filled drive ah the excess. . . - . (inaudible) also concluded ah that the •• excess would he unsafe in the following fashion. Ah a vehicle exiting at the side would have limited viability to the right. It would seem unlikely to be able to see the entire body of the car or other vehicle approaching from the right that a ah that a truck making a right turn onto through the turn 3c,n, either would enter to Bonita would also enter into the left hand lane, that a that the city could not permit the left hand turn for entering into the left hand lane at Bonita. That cars approaching Or other vehicles approaching Bonita from tile right have limited viLbi1iby ah into the site and would run ah ah danger of strikiLg vehicles entering the left hand lane from the site. Ah the ah conclusionary findings of planning commj4sion while accepting the. , . . , value of ah findings of tie public utilities commission and cthers on safety and access ah ah ah must form its own conclusion on thi2 matter for purposes including minor land paxtition. TEPEDINO: Was that your motion? WOOD: TEPEDINO: The motion on the floor. Second TEFEDINO: Its been moved and seconded. Is there any further • discussion? SPEAXER: Ah, Mr. Chairma:n, ah since you deny this ah obviously . . . e . (inRudible) . What I'm wondering i8 what this site how the site can be .u8ed„ Obviously as land gets scarcer it9,5 going to have to be used sometime. And what Pm wondering is ah ah what that property can be used for. TEPEDINO: Mr. speaker, I appreciate your conoern, but I think that the to state the use of the property at this time would be Npeoulative and conjective. So I think this would be the proper form to ra 8e as you go over appeals for (inaudible) . 1'w just saying that. . . . . (inaudible) , „• �l• • Page 21 (Appeal: Conditional Use M1P-5-78) TEPEDINO: Ali, m'orbi n. made and seconded, Any further discussion. I'll Lill for the question. All those in favor of denial for the reasons presented, by Commissioner Wood :lnd especially by Commissioner Prirrin signify by say.. ,"in; Aye. DENIAI UNANIMOUS • ,A A [11 .A1 I ,...„.. , AGENDA: . , ..„ ,• g 7"IGAIR L ': tail Z.Nr.; COM fitil S 3 ION , . i. Ta 1.''' ',! 1 C ul:I ' "' '7/ "3(0 lyi , ,. 1,low:'llec ,,),1,,i,lr.,41. .).1: ',0.,,,,:,:tli,,, ,.'cilw.,A1 - ,,pcture Prig= , . C;9.,,f1:5 5W tc.f.t,,lnut - 1P1gard, Cregan . ,di, ):, • '..!,, ay . Galig .;,, .. ■4 ' ::,0 , Apiv.,,,,• 11 V.0,' WiroaltWA'r . 4, 701ToAlc,:??,., ons ... ;L •••.:11x1f.',,,I..i,!,•• He i!..t. . Sta 1'.f.' Re por t . , ..• B., Appl.1 c an t' s Vir etl.iell)t.at ion . , .. •,: , .,:•,. C., i vb.!!li_;;L',' Testi m:3,ny . ,. , 0 ;;". ,,t'',1'‘,t,,•voinent.,: k,,:' b,,, Opponent's ,a.., 0„ (4, S >tai't,11,na C 13,0 n • l',.•,,,, .;lit i,J.,f* Pev:orcameri dot ion . , .. r„, i,Arite IL$5 i©Ett :Das rus a im n and .;c t;Ion . . . . . . 5 ,7, ':t/19 7",,., .1;iq' tI :lF, '4,'',R) 8-7 8 f,c EA C Cans it... Co,‘ ) NINCI ;:::!; („:: & ,`•,2 C't,v•,,Ptivr,t- C „, tor „-;., Condi.t i o nal U's e i:Per M i t t.0 Con ., '::tro(('Ir ad' Fe fJr the Aged in 4 CP "Commerciai Professinnal4' re4onto . , 07; .4,,Z,Oi, ac,ir., par cal at, thz.,, i.Irmo r sec t ion. of 1.1'3iit Beef Bend Po•atdi and . . . -i.:%;',;,•.',4,i I i c illigy .;',%.;:':a.s1h)„, Co, Tax Map 2 SI j,,OA 4 Tia7,, Lot 3 900) .. 1.: '!. .,.1 : , .,r,,;:lt”sir lc:N,''_.L., ; t,e, CV 40-78 ,,city of Tigard) ,,,,,, '• i: et„11.0i,:.i.,4.,T' t'sry the, '::,•L it ' of rri,,,ira rd to tAst ot,,at„te the h t stop', 11:•gomiz t.(c. e."+ '.,.:4,FAIC t 0 it land b,,;tweE,+n P a c la,:IF ic Noy and Fro n tag oi,b, iR(.1:Ad 4',t '4 .! 'it r A'k St:ti ee li, W.4 mth „ Co, Tax •i",,.1.?4,7, 2 51 2C.1; Tam Lot un i de nt i f.i•e(t,:4)) , i CrslroN",• , Unit3 CIS 3-77 (McCoy) t, 'rvtri, 6 w,Noitvt 'ty wr, ..,:md mca, Sames McCoy to creAte A 6tventh dupaer, .• 1!4-,,,q., l i I r t s i ;a. pT „!' ,,,l i t ppr e m a d s ix-lot, 4 k 1 ubd ivi n ,o n cm a 90 ,,,i1 -,4, tki 2 7 ef ” '01.'n VI''.11!'" '!.ie'3! -tit : 53t 5 it:.1,, vi 0.J11 I!W a sh. Co Pa,x .tal 0„„.A., 3!I(,,,.6 0 TA M '.,;40,)it, ,7 4.1!T.):, , 004:1Z71) . L'&,loS; '1,110v.11.1''t es) .,„ ' :11.10 t 'by J'ega at ow to es to appe a 1 thc... de e it ion by the T. g,;.a'.,r•c',i - ,' " 7•0'ir;;:t al;...7.: DI.)•,''oPtit+10':','? reato,;;:;a'd A ng Kt not Land Pair t 1 ti.on 5-;?8, r asq;me e,t 4,,vpfli It ehou se zt gig '11 3 r d a hd 1301(111 ta; Poi id ,tWas 4.1' Co it",•,rre, . :,,,,....) ,4•,i,-1,i,. ';',::::'.., ,',4. 4 Tix l',,y.,',,,t)t 40.00) 4 4, oo,)r LO . . . . . . , .L. 1 . , I ' I.:'' "7'16' . t7t;"'":7- ---- '.---"•.';4174 4,77:......,....-..„....,,..,:-;„... .....„,.....„,.............zr,......,•,':..t....,-,H 7,.. IIIMINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION July 25 , 1978 - 77,30 PM II Fowler 'Junior High School - Lecture Room 10865 S.W . Walnut - Tigard, Oregon 1. Call to Order: Meeting was called to order at 7 : 35 P,.14.. . 2. Roll Call : Pxesent: Brian, Smith, Speaker, Quimby, Tepedino, Corliss, Rossman, Wood Staff: Howard, Mackenzie, Barker 3. Approval of. Minutes : \' The minutes of July 11, 1978 were approved as submitted. 4. Communications : None 5. Public Hearings: 5. 1 Conditional Use CU 8-78 ( C&C Construction Co. ) NPC. #3 A request by C & C Construction Company to construct a Home for the Aged in a CP ''Commercial ' rofessionai" zone on a 4 . 35 acre parcel at the !wltersection of S.W. Beef . Bend Road and Pacific Highway 'Wash. Co . Tax Map 2S1 10A, Tax It 3900) A. Staff Report: ' Read by Howard 8. Applicant' s Presentation: Norman Glenn stated he represented C & C Construction and was one of the owners. A traffic study was done and traffic thought to lie no problem. Bob Booth the s or c,i the traffic study was present 1 to answer quest ..ons. Elevation of building was also ,� thought to be no problem. Copies of elevation drawings were available. Sewer arrangements were made by an II agreement between City of l' .card. and Unified Sewer Agency, Quimby asked for details on the storm water deten- ion Plan, Loren Mines of Norm, Baiwroft & Associates descr.ibt d the storm water detention plan as enlarged natural I basin with gently sloped sides, u nn - „. .; „w,w..n. a. y 1. .. Nor+ .r MINUTES ,, TIGARD PLANNING{y.�� ) tMIS, ION July 25, 1: 78 , Page 2 Wood asked if 50% more detention could be built into . i . basin without significantly increasing costs. Glenn said that it would not appreciably increase costs. . C. Public Testimony: , Fred Anderson spoke in opposition of the project's sewerage arrangement. Wished applicant to make a nonremo istrance agreement with the LID for local property owners. Local property owners wish to have the option to terminate from the surge line and establish, their own gravity flow sewer 'System. C&C Construction states they would biLi happy to switch ' over when possible. D. Staff Recommendation: . Staff recommends approval subject to Planning Commission review of traffic study and elevation drawings. E. Commission Discussion and Action: M r . Wood moved approval. based on staff finding,. and • recommendations wjvh the following additional conditions: ,i. That 50% more detention be required in the storm water basin bey that required by ordinance. r That the , at be subject to design review before a permit is i,,,sued. .That applicant file a non-remonstrance. agreement with L.I.D. ' . Motion was appro'tred unanimously„, I ". w 5 .2 Conditional Use CU 20.78. (City of Tigard) NPO 01 ' A request by the City of Tigard to relocate the historic Tigard Home to a tract of land between Pacific Higbway and Frontage Road at Park S�.r& et (Wash. Coo Tax Map 251 2CB, Tax . Lot unidentified) . +,p A. Staff Repo . t : f.n. t:l A. Read by Howard , 8. Applicant' s Presentation Aldine Howard for the City of Tigard is in concurrence with the Staff repot C Public Testimony' -, •;,- - ' . , -4 , •-- . MINUTES , ,„ ,‘ TolGARD PLANNING COMMI9TON . le July 25, 1978 ) , . . 1 % Page 3 ' . f.r, J''F-; ". : 4 Laverne Sharpe representing Friends of the Musuem, %_ . objected to the new site of the historic home. Ms. . P Sharpe stated that the Calvin Presbyterian church I, ., had offered use of land adjacent to the church. , , A . . , , ,_ .° Qumby stated that the house, was impeding deve,0,1p- •v , , ment and that Ted Millar had alre,ad been generous . , with time and money. Stated that location was near , 4i.,, the Presbyterian Church would be inaccessible to 4- , many people. N•• Wood asked if Sharpe would be interested in post- poning the decision on the house. 1 Sharpe was in favor of postponing the deciion. 7, ., . Corliss asked Staff about the proposed site and what ,, . , improvments.would be necessary. Wood asked about traffic, safety, setbacks & parking. '..■• . . . , . . Howard stated the Frontage Road was easily accessible coming into the City, suggested white picket fence for children, parking would be along Frontage Road and 1 0 e IP do tl,..it the house met setback requirements for the lot. Howard also mentioned the instailation of a future traffic signal. i9e, ' Brian stated that there was not enough information available in regard to parking and traffic and asked if request could be tabled until more information -1111 was available. D. Staff ecommendation: ' Staff recommends approval based on findings of fact. L. Commission Discussion: IQuinby moved to approve conditional use with the following conditions: 1. Detail of traffic situation. 2 Plan for parking facilities .i,':,1.'.;.';..!1' Voted for denial. A motion was made to table the proposed request until a better location, can be investigated, and the questions of tratic, parking and safety can be addresed. The motion was approved 6 2 ' 7 * , k 41 • MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION July 25, 1978 Page 4 5. 3 Conditional Use CU 23-77 .(McCoy) NPO 06 A request by James McCoy ti.) create a seventh duplex lot, • in a previously, approved six-lot subdivision on 'a 1.90 acre parcel at 158(,5 S.W. 98th (Wash. , Co. Tax Map 2S1 11CD, Tax Lot 700) . A. Staff Report: Read by Howard B. Applicant's Presentation: James McCoy stated that he had previously reserved one lot with garden space and now finds it advantageous to use the lot for a duplex (deleting the garden) . C. Public Testimony: • None D. Staff Recommendation: e t Staff recommends approval. . •a E. Commission Discussion: Corliss moved, to approve proposal. Motion w as carried unanimously. • 5.4 Miscellaneous (Shourtes) WPO 05 A request by John Skourtes to appeal the decision by the Tigard Planning Director regarding Minor Land Partition 4` t MLP 5-78, requesting construction of a warehouse at S.W. '. 73rd and Bonita 'R.o acs (Wash Co. Tax Map 281, Tax Lot 4000) . A. 15taf L' kepo;ct b ' I`p . ea'i by Howard, • `'t'', • ' Jty t Ny i' t tt��«�1'�,4�I�'j� 'lYiCi'rr �1 )3. Applicant' s Presentation: u�,4!�x.;�1r��' i'� ? Fred Anderson representing Skourtes stated that the • lease permits use for storage facilities. Anderson . presented evidence of Lot size and adequate fire and water provisions. The project Will be added property for tax base States that there is ample room for wide acCe building N; site. sewer agreeMet'tt � S and ldi ng on si had been made with Unified Sewer Agency: He gave site profile and explained that fill would be supplied to bring access road up to roadv.ay» • , n. MINUTES y ;,, TIGAFD PLANNING COMMIS:14.,:ON ; July 25, 1978 • I Page 5 Bailey ,questions if Skourtes needed to go through the minor land partition process in the first place . ' Wood asked if min' mum lot width requirements applied to a non-rectangular lot. • Bailey said it was applicable. " , Barker stated that sta.°f had a legitimate safety concern with the access road to Bonita toad. r, e. C. Public Testimony: Skourtes explained that grade would be raised for - visibility, lowest point would be 24 inches. Access :•,Y road would be no hazard. • .. , /:' Corliss asked about proposed building and tenants. Skourtes stated that one tenant was a Sprinkler Company that would fabricate and ship materials. )1 . D. Staff Recommendation : Staff recommends denial of appeal based on staff `" findings. Y E. Commission Discussion: Wood stated that access road was unsafe due to visibility and pointei out that large trucks would go into the left ha{:id lane when turning out Staff, City Administrator and Planning Commission all concurred that the access was unsafe. 111 Motion was made to deny the appeal. Motion was passed unanimously. ' r G. Other FJusxnes s staff requasts that a complete application be necessary for incl sign on an g`� a nc�a :,,,,i,,,,,,4 Request for as Special meeting to take care of applicants who have been missed in staff t '"�n'��ition. Commission is in t vcr of request with the condition t� az. staff present a packet Yo meeting and arrange a Suitable time. ,,,,:- Need for a NPO .8 meeting oun.curting Bishop/Rembold before zone Change is brought before Commission and public hearing., Planning Commission a e ked• staff to review Mere, tone Development and their construction on the flood plain. A '000°, • J + • • MINUTES {N44,: ,. • TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION : uly 25, 1978 Page 6 • NPO #7 Chairperson would like to bring the NPO #7 Plan before the Planning Commission at a study session. • Concerns of the Commission regarding the Planning staff and lack of professional planners. Mr. Barker, City' Administrator said that for 'large subdivisions the City would' hire a consultant. 7. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 P.M. • • • ' • \ r 'It J, •o0r rJ ` • ' ..... .Jw grfu«ixr.« .Jx.. u,r .,,+.w..� -rn+.m.w?* wyn .>.+..nvu' .. ..J «+.wr..nu ... ,. .. v,, .. ..,.. ... • t,N rcn,4` STAFF REPORT • AGENDA 5 . 4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION . July 25, 1978 Fowler Junior High Lecture Room 10865 S.C . Walnut St. •- Tigard, Oregon Docket: Appeal MLP 5-78 Request: A request by John Skourtes to appeal the decision by the Tigard }.11ann.ing Director regarding Minor Land Partition 5-78 , requesting construction of a warehouse. Location: 73rd and Bonita Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 251, Tax Lot 4000) . Applicant: `,.dtional Safety Company I. Basic Facts: • 1. The applicant is requesting pe'rmis'sion in accordance with, Section 17.24 . 030 of the Tigard Municipal Cody,,' . . to create out... of a portion of the Southern 'Pacific right-of--way a 1.. 2 8 acre parcel in a M-3, Light Industrial zone at S .W. Bonita. Road., eastside of S.W. 74th Avenue. 2 . The site is a triangular shaped lot bordered on two sides (east and west) by railroad lines. The property . is several. feet beloW the grade of S.W. Bonita Road which borders the parcel to tie north. The southern portion of the site lies within the 100 year flood • plain.• Surrounding land use is industrial and residential properties. 3. ,In the M-3 zone the following lot requirements are applicable: - 6 ,000 square foot minimum lot size (Section. 18. 48.030 (1) ) . 60 foot minimum lot width (Section ld. 48 . 030 (2) . ►' - Setbacks shall he 30 feet front, 20 feet side yard, 20 feet rear yard. (Section 18 . 48 . 0t0 (1,2 , 3) . No setbacks required when side or rear properties lines abut a railroad right-of-way (Section 18.48 .040 ll (4) ) . II. Staff Recommendation Aft "- a lengthy and detailed study of this matter, staff rem.,amends that the Tigard Planning Comrr'iSsion deny this appeal. • 1 AFFIDAVIT `" PU LICA ` RECEIVED ,,uBLIC NOTICE; ;;.*,. ;' : ". gyp, 4.1GARD PLANNING COMMISSION;.: STATE OF OREGON, J U L 2 1 19/A July 25, 1'178--» 7:30+„PM ,,,,,,,i,�,y,,;:,r-:.. COUNTY OF WAS17L.,�GTOPy ss. Fowler Junior High„School•-Lec'tare r j, r Room ' ; , CITY OF T1GI RD 10865 S.W.Walnut .--Tigard, Oregon'':''' • I , 5..PUBLIC HEARINGS. , .4 •° ..Jes•eph••.•ath'afer 5.1.COND TIO:'iAL USE CU 3..78'(C & C Corlst.Co.) NPO 3 , —3,. being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher ......”-...,____ A request by C t�c•C Construction Co. �. for a Conditional Use,Permit to con ... . , of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as,defined struct a f'rome for�'tl': Aged in a CP,` .' "Comme.-cia1 .0rofessi,onv,1" zone'on a , . by ORS 193.01C and 193,020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and 4,35 acre parcel +t'?,he intersection of rh SW Beef Bend Rod and 1'`aoific Hwy state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of Which is hereto'annexrd, was (Wash. Co.Tax Mt.p 2SI 10A,Tax 1.cit 3900). ..:, ' , ,,'; , published in the entire issue of said newspaper for 2 ' successive and 5°2 CONDITIONA' USE CU 20-78 ' (City of Tigard') NPO 1 ‘i consecutive weeks in the following issues ..,...._...:........................... r io rte the by.the City of Tigard to_ locate the historic Tig&rd.horne to a July Y 12 & 19, 1978 tract of land bet�xeen Pacific Hwy and _..................... ...... ...... �,....,......._..... Frontage Road at. Path Street,(Wash. ` G...... Co.Tax Map 251 2CB,Tax Eot uniden-» rt ,... ,,____. tilled) i" ' ,U cSi� tube) d 5,3 CONDITIONAL USE CU.2347' f (McCoy) NPO 6 •.. ,.,.,,y4.„.,.„ by �� ' sworn .......,20th ............. day of MA request b Mr'.se.�and rlthr Mrs.-James uple crlot. yt�btrlbed and worn to before me this ,......._......_.. �cCoy to create 'dtrple�,a lot in a previously approved:six-lot subdi- "' vision on a 1,90 acre parcel at 1.5805 SW . .y^..� ��y)//1 f,-/JN�,}9 f,/_r.- 98th (Wash. Co..Tax Map 251 11CD, ,... .• ll f/.. Tax Lot ). • •�,` Notary Pu lie of Oregon W,,,,.. t/.. A ,EOUS Skeur•- COMMISSION! EXPIRES test � �'' My commission expires FEB. 1i 108219,.....,. An appeal by.John Slsourtes of a de- cision by the Tigard Platming Director __ ----" regarding Minor Land, Partition 5-78, ,, , retesting construction of,a ware- r, house at SW 73rd and Bonita..Road. . , I •(Wash.Co.Tax Map 251 ,12A,Tax;Lot 0 1 1, 9000). . ,y,. ._.., ' All persons having an interest in the . subject +'natter',are invited toe,attend ' n and submit written and oral t stiimony: or submit Written testimony i ,advti?ce•, ' of the meeting. a'F, 1:"7:.'',444,,,,,A. TL'3753 Publish July 1.2, 19,74 t� p • 1, .', 414::1, 41,+ .,u,,'. ;f.',. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard " CifORLE, I, 44€4.1abie4---12trrgers-s.. ', being firc:It duly swotn, on oath depose and ,/ say: That I am Secretary for the Planning Department for the City of Tigard, Oregon That I served notice of hearing of the Tigard Plan- ning Commission of Which the attached is a copy (Marked 41kt A) upon each of the follow! g named perons(1....pn the day of 197 , y mailing to each of them at the address show )on the attached list (Marked Exhibit B) , said notice as her et...t attached, depos .tedin the United States Mail on the 40 ___L day of 197_ F, postage prepaid. drt, 11144/C (74121(414i. )N) /C171,.. Subpiribed and sworn to bef9re me on the day of •re-3 ) \A*1 ( 4 y Air kleets,,,.„ ry Public of Oregon ) " 'deimitiE.t.sion expires: _IL *0'4 1 .: • Fr , , , . , t. CITY OF TIGARD ,a:O. Sox 23397 ' 12420 S.W. Main . ., Tigard,Oregon 97223 . u Dear Property Owner: The agenda enclosed for the next meeting of the Tigard Planning Commission includes an item (circled in red) which, due to its � location adjacent to property owned or occupied by you, or due to your previously indicated inter st, the City :feels obligated to notify you. If you wish to make your views known in this matter, or if you only wish to ava:1.l yourself of this opportunity to be informed concerning this project, the Tigard Planning Commission invites i . you to attend this meeting. . • , . , • t. I 1 � s I. 4 b .7'J_..,: I., ,. ,' , ..,, ' _., ..,...., .,„ J ,, .. .i. x , .. . „,u+x-,,r,.v•♦,q•,..r-+n.fw.•+., rvr+».,i,„,.,, .L....+..wy..s.�www. ,p `. muu«+.irw.venA;t•,uo.<u i_,M...,,..w,..M..v r,.,,.,,..,,..w ,.•x ...n.:.::.` '•«.w....•a+aax�, ., • , P ��. — ` — 1 ^'• - "' ' t�_: o6:a: " , T ," P,ip� , �i • «1 «1 , F 1 ntf'\ r 0 ''''''r , c� .. r'a M 8.884 cr. • ''*' r ' • r ti��, \ 402-Al, co-: -G+ v A. ..n, ,r \ ;'.. , W • I ∎4 1,_ rTIL t.,F) .s --lei ' . . „....„., . ,,,..„... . , . . \ . , ' ! ± :���li � 8'° ,C° . *4r+ . ti . 8`8 52 ' . k r sv ,4.! . r ��.YY re `y. t' , +. r L' ((( 8 3".1��^M'�,i1. � A Y L,1L p. J Aw�k,. � � V •\ t � ^ • �- 1 _.• a ,1w, F ". i- ‘i,-'s,'!'sJ 'y 'w ".rt „4.4.,`,. ' ;�. � Jr n.1'.,1 ,.,11,,'�t �.Y'� ,•, il. ;t r', //��• c' t.J't.JG ‘'...4,./.l•'t� .,,, N „. 4 .17 �rr.iM • .. .4,:'•Y,'' *r ,�I .` "k 4X r T'M ,?4,,,,:.,..: .`* - • '5../l 'Y't :"' w •:61Ac +Nr'r t.i, , (A ' d ../' '`ti','41, ..N.1.:,,'',:'rti y?"w.r.. xY„��• n,k��.n., �{.t�' �+ x\.»+y.c r ,,e a+, s« o r r,"1` \ . 0o • v” ...�• 1'• ,{"•t 7"t7 L�5•'�,4:':•,`x 19"�d •'� kr,M�.,..,12'0“,e Y ,F'.,. t er,»"" "'« 1, >r.J' •, I I • 4i I„«.�..,.+� .ei'a•., v— ' ” ) 3046.• �+-: ": a l, 514 "r '1 4t i+14,..t .4• a , 2,59avC •e.,'. 'k'. ';', €q Mir F"s' • ' w,y ,•, ' 'a ''� '' t ^'23Q':- ,• «•1 s.ft ..•�I� I tares. `� ONIT4 +UNDAY'SCHOOL`t„,L)" `�, » k .erg W __yy�r� ' M nn �. i, r : 7�'•1 M'1 w 4 j' r�� '� _ " .r#«. '=t .. .. "- 'M � tD • �'��Vr''±:�r�Yrtr �� w , 'iU I .a �/Nn a,";,i1::,xr li y �- S88°Sgw+.._ t M - • 1,,a +'t •a 4i \ =q„K N ay'1 ysl y. .�'°..,•'w11� i.,,r ��s , l�: !A QO , •x t'+ P 1 ;':il''iiT :•41 t, ■ ,Y .t ik:41.4r • '; } N I N . .•« .,.r .�, y.. , "At��l�{,4,p ;mow, K�t`,1. 4 zAm, •• ,. �i88m 59 W \ ,1 WEST i 185 .._.I. S89°21'UF 230'' 4�rj0�0` 56,"'■ . l' ,..—.......—. (el ( '""..`.'� {, 138 IIZ65 2J0 28.3@ 1 p."' „, 800 r cot , a) ;¢ 194I 1900 I °0,4rA.c' 4. ».. �c r c? 2114AG1 ' . l$ 4c, "—f. .0 r 1,97 Ac, R 1 ,..,•. 0 800--AI L 1 I7r s ...1. u, " I ` -; N I oo' E E - N .I .'• w _ II { " rU 24.5d m ) 19A,} "a, 2 04i 2$'. I 1211 '« ■ IN89°32}2 y381.4' t\,,i, o ._0,-111 90 z / O' Ma.904c, 40' , ' w M rS89°52'W 387,2' ' a' ' '• ' !29.70' w,, 3.-• k 1000 ; I1=lii'YLIIJJ N• fi-'/x 1 441 fi ! fiii+=?; �Ij;$CHId1�Y. `I,•Nk L -k.,. g1'Fi''UI7'-7 yl iII --63,304 l 5- �� i Lief�MY'F_2q g ,II 21,(00' �b .luAl ...air 401,. , A 2l°�b-3 10 nLiHE�iN PACE ry 1843 aW HALL ELVD TIGARD, •' P';' 3 304 UNION STA ERFiELD N• R-7p-p � �I fii� p !fVGT JL E?' AGNES M KENNET7H L Ol4 0350 2/70 X511IY7 3,400 $,;tO 9.15AL` RU4. 032 02 3Q A-21375-3801 PREDELIVEAY SEA, 1008 • A6i 7 SW •RA 7LER RD TI °7y'_ [� N �F="j lil IkV a'y` u.1dP { r~`rA YL, JOIN A "' 11 'TT"' ! , r, 1tl 0•G6AG fi 4 `U•ca 8 A- -„o`U' •2110-MD "�.'LO F ,1 Y Atr , 15'x4 5W"HALL BLVD TIGARD, 97023 14890 SW aNp ERFJELD N. R-7P-p ",1 '!7"r.l 'u,•,. U1 BARKRR. MILIIrEb E ET ^qL 1016-0,038 3/75 51 i LD I 16,000' 17300 33,900 18.89AC R'.:4 D32 Q2,3E A-21376.3810 SOUTHERN P,L Iri ii in +ri , y, h .g,����ST_A PoRTLAN. •R pi iv,,,+ iaY N oN_r�_f4r E'TT"1"L N li-f}T'L ., t 'r•'< •A' 5. W 4157 1o9=219' / �'.a', p 11,7!',0, I ,`00 1 ,DUO -.118-A- :; kU4 011• •..3 A-c'�1'd"/9•-3 G�'�EI:�. CN C�h�iP;` , i•r � ,}109,;5 SW 41ST PORTLAND, OREGON 97219 P 0 BOX 23345 ERFIELO NL R-7P°,p J;•S �� " ttFµ rDQ' RiEGK. GEORGE CLARA E 1004.01189 10/71 511III 6,B0h 17,200 24,000 .71 AC R-7P-D 101E' 0237 A-8t38I-OlOa CLAVLRIE, HENRY: g 8, W O 0 IOARt� 7.1001 P2 + LrSRB_.a!i't441L. -'' ui5 W BONtTAi� EnriELO N. ..;-» '„f1' i e- Ici? C , G U 0 H`A'S e4u-Orf�5 1 7 lil DTI(-0 11 ,9-0-0418.9.A0 »7 -!7 4nti �?$ A-2[381 Qitil CLAVCI t fIL�1N4,'',s • a ,r "34th- rfsr " EIT TUALATiN OEVELOPMEMT CO 1,300 SW 11-TH AVE TLdARO, OREGON 87 7615 5W BOVlITA,. ERF]ELD N R-7!'-p 0,2 *i r;•,(r,':,::r'i ,T'0'KRu7Un•AU7ENR¢ 4RNTECO WLC011712N 1°001 '7,11JO• R8,200 54,2QO 7."'3 AC' R-7P-D 4002 0237 A-21381 D200 SNYUER. VERLEAH!, WQ 4.1 7'75 SW 0¢N , tr KR LI<, (Ik,ORO L k'A F'"" LfF-�"� I'U r 6 1 1 ,�' "i "C L� N• ' "p-p t 1't ir p r/ A 1^!1 BY AT'UALATIN D.VELdP:1ENT CO 15300 510 1161H E T1fA" OREGON - 223 -- '� 4A:re 4 OED 0 A- 1 I-UaUr F E U ■ ERFiELD N• 13'7P-p ix 1 01t?'''NELSON. AT DORIS 5Y 121, 113,000 708,400 9UB,40U 4.2,1E M»2 3p 12 0239 A-21381-0400 WEAVER.WPAULU E'' l Oq2 t4', ,At.;, 11"1,. b Yom,,,R !V3 f?p„el, ND (IRE' •• 97, 3 rRFT'Lb N. a-,V , , a t!«71 i k Q 11 J tt JR 77�F l...\OE S!!i'AI R OON�� 1r=0r U ,p AC - 341E.' q .'.l1 A- J�'1 OV(ll DY`GPO 5 G LIFIE'; r , Id s 1 x GEIiBkk LEOIENII pi BLADES 14,00 SW 72•• AVE ORTLA,I , OREGON 971 2°. 4828 5W JULIA RFIELD N• R-7R'la'1!•+12 A+y< t' l%°102 E�Z�J��4IL.SWAMSDAlL_lriNTffl . l 4+110 aW ND -•- LA . CF L 4 'j22`8`01 2.300' 11,802 330E M 2 ;Or2 023; A-21'09: 150Q KRt1E5E. AF ON 1 (1 i XFR2h5WA4 Ut.YCLUI-IH CO 51720 �32�a.�1,"1'1 j°�3r'IUU UO tl, C 3U: i"': A-2l'�U ObUU'd'ALL ANA ,-, y�'Yr t ° `�r r n 04 WILLIAMS A72N0-�AVEOTUALAY4N1,?I,7W 7062 P•RTLA y5112AG !^,�"-.y: ,900 LEASEHOLD MALI M-2- ,3012 0238 A-21381-0700 BURNS, ROBERTFWt, • ,7nd,. RF I E]_0 N R-7P-p t Otl 'af ,- "7J' 1 925.OUO 825 '(t='".1F'4'--G 2 y t" PI 7 p v S`"dTV'c'3 1 - •Z_.__^.. 11'2" '483, 0 4 {ouo MACE VI:.• I E•... B 15 SW BoN T i. k r';�1� 30,2 •2''9 A-°�i'�p1��II9oo o••MAf:�"�I>:t�N"',�'o " w i -' .,'3.4,3 POF TI,.W.J.,SRS^ 1.451.0„.. "S 1 120 .l 46 _w ,« _<--4,731:1-p 146 ,_ »«� 15600 SW BEEF + P O BCi%23343 TIOARh, pREGOt 47233 ERF1E40 N. P-7P-p Ibbd tl t.,r, 7O UUOO TEEOONELLSJN COMPANY 1055-0240 111,'• 700 7OO 5.20AC M-PM-4 3002 0238 A-r''i381-QBOS MANNA, NORMAN K`, I"IJ` qq T E 205 51 BMA P.7iF' '�` • se-"%r 1 , '., >, v,=YrUP �P ONBOX 23343 PORTLAN;1, ORE 1N'1/223 IIr7 Il„A Al 4),SUO 1,b:.nC W. U,-.•'. t12 = A^d i"','x.OITUJUf1 H1'11th), 11 HALL d a l r r , > 93,100 1 IOIO SW HALL ERFJELO N. R-7f'»D'tOC2 ,1.''A"'.tiil' TEb NEL'ON COMPANY 0,6-0240 11 7. 511, 93,100 3.5CAC M-3 3002 0230 A-•sa1381 touo YOUNa, R L CO v r��l�='+"'a':'4�''r .0'r5 " •OI;ui�O' %,, I.;,' Tl.,1 31`011;-,_,C!'' • ••••.rP ..,�-, ..� .,-�......-„-..,,�..� ,.�;... °.. 1,4'Fa...Sl�._NWY 2', 11111-e°5-1441,"F,"71"0 ,r -`F c 1I-'.f--, ., Sl°l G'r+'' t4.w'.ltl' 17• Y3 j JJ f "1:'4AC I M^° •"' iU 2' 0'.:19 A°f;lSEil ,IOU 1540 4 r;'9B�H•, Vtw' t }., 4011 NVl SKYLINR�•5'LVO P1IRTLANb, 0"rtEuON w�r'V.9 If,-� 3w 92ND T CRFIEI. R-7P-p 1002,0?. t i e "`y+•7401 ANOERbt~iI, H A A+. 1314-pBB4 3 '10 -81130 Y7 70,G09 W^23,300 1 1 ,rrUO 8,63AC 11-a 3'1,2 0238 A-"1301.:1'10 0-HALLORAN, THO a 1"a"i1+ Fp11,,1)1 ^ (NC P 0.13,11'K L'rR,_P RTLAh.. QfIF (ltJ 372^0 >~`kFtEL'-i``fl `f�« ;» �°7•J�r'�';1,'r'w-"tl"t,e �.I,MI: .i�'�l°ai, 'f"Lf'nL r1Q1H»u�O4 °r''Jti'otirA r ra`"iaJ"� ii'�?.iQ-N"'"i,�,:�i`;a`ciu ri,'3dAC"' ..,.».,"`�•1'�"'"'..._``'�ui�" O � n-2izl�i'=iiao' '�i`"• 1° 1'1 ', F` 9Y FOUGHT ',1 INC 14256'"',.I':2NJ 14VE P-'-TL AN . 01 10 97223' I 1_ I4b0'9t•!HAL,r t ..rAFiaLO:1 R-7P-D t"1E7G-0'1'03 FOUGHT COMPANY Ir. Silc°A 733,B'I "'35,600 MAr..rrlNwli1 : EL II•iJ '0220 t-8;3111-t:'JG -HALLLORAN NEI. 1002 tt u , � � '4�,i� rW 7raC4 T 112.4^C 0 E 9h A7'tc? _ _ _ 1 , •iI r r _ - • l' ;~gt16ut.�,t.,iii:l.i L 1011rI r'RI.ifiTtl'A.. .., r - ,-4A---------.- IAA . t1 w F Ht l Lt+N -�F'� n v �d T.E'�1:t7ii 't;" C:11�.r' �1 li�.'WA M4"F7U'�i,4jJ,i•rµ�_15b, ,.0 f�^u'�:010 �!��UL:i� A+1;11;'1=t3'JJ`WA,f€tJ4Ak, 1,4..410� ';'- t,.e.:1116.1701' 7325 II J1 TA RO eOE3TLA!Jj -9-.6:;i3-4-6.~, k44UU aW MIOHN,, £RFJEL7 4+ R-7P-17 1002 ?, •(p^ 0.1.1 A�+,,�. 1*R°POPT,ILANm 1,7-, ll a°! 00,700' 108,'00 3.16." M-2 002 0235 A-21391131, wonta, OI�` � MICE, 4214,Ak.l 91 bO 1 1 51184 1 I v„rr tT'1 %lr.. -1'7.° I,r_ ,, ,,4 tilliSra:at-610 WIi.1SJ MAFt3AI Ii -87'50 81.,180.----...071-153- "`.31.•i-, iCJ X11" -no -,,," ; Pl i 'UIa, .01:5(1 A-1,;165':"I4:rI NA.."",•"H1`ROA E. }. P 0 OdX 57,A„ sIi SA•1 !tt.IoNd0, iX `18,'I3 I"•3," SW HALL o' 6} ,RFIEL!I N• R-79-0 BOA �"^t d;' •°1µ+�19 0610 Nliii I' rt.?:050 k 1!V t f GxLnit la9n-tajv's :1(73 SI,2A -153.20'0 443,100 598.200 1s,i1JAC i M-2 ail `0238 A-2l'?B1-Jv ih 'apEn1Ey WEW Yr'A. •' '7-FI - `; 1'r ,;' 14BJ I'L."M14 aIJ u -s . w1T �,-.w._...., .-- .�I.- J F_ WA ELU fJ i,' �' a1„ _UvtJ=115 1 AI I '7- , A v 1 1`r" " Ul,:7U tl�i- rr '�itlfe ci3� 1-:Ik11 ItiUO 9E,�IBI "'H "WA L'� ` � BETVlLEHh»: OTEEt CdRP 730v .AHC'1ARK I P'TiCARII, OR ''4c"Y ;°---.�-....» � :�12{ SW MULTNGI 1002 Ni, ',"ir>."r"}1..0700 1' lB, L k 4L:g,p,r,4W ry I1 RF1EL0 N R�-•79.0 '•':.: , - r 1,2a 143;700 13.400 3 .;iq t'Yt,C 1-1 3& (Mal A-21,101"1'7D{lll l'1ME1., CARD !' � !•l 01,1,0, 15,TP24nl�rr. '+ rr.r! 47:1P, 1 AiM 1 '� g �" _ ,.....,.,,... .®.�-- ».`t'_..,-.,.. ,. ,.-_..". -.C' V:VU,.1,I NA.I.SLY TT A. � : a t�ti !'�"p'�tt`' ,l T GAk+, uIFT ,: ra'r.gt12 tilt:h ',Jt:n^'s" °"I°I`�$^ ��Iric ,:'S7 A>i::�ilI�1�1tJU HAMdACii;"Ti�HU' i `RTII,(I" n �.,'1 "'-_;`3i 40780 L COLUME{A MUrli1A'1 ":r,14JUL .7;%68 5I IBA "IiAG M•3 060'? 0237 7735 SW DURHAM I 1 I� , n 10 " '; 74.15 'Al.i4/bt1.t1 A RD T1.t1,r`1T1N, 1062 "t RFIELD N R-7P-0 10.2' 6;y" '.'�.",' ,..,'C'� I9n t• r;AIRR CIARL ^t Ha, 'MAl','F ",1 041?? r ,T. n••81;301-19UtJ 5CWPIbT OhIN- J y,.., i 412 a `7 H3 5 64! RO,' ... at 4'� ;.a0 �•�y. _ 1a'!,:60.1 ,.94!4....,- M^� . _; r'k i tiuIi liIF:"l A.,TTrIII Cti 2101 !LbrIEu ■ i "AA 'R ', . ' A 21';,11=` U IA A.II W1 LL''J A'R RFIELD NC R°^P-d 100E''''., 1 $'•.:,JOU9, L. ,,,,1N0., _ 5112 131,9D01 131,900 MACHINERY EC 30.2 0237 14885 5w 9151' J ' 7440 5W BONITA TIGARD. OREG. n «r tl, RLANGI 1IMO"HY 2 , A-21381-2104 B IN, IARLEr, • 23 t •!s Ci,�,t5.. ,,. .. -.® ,:51„LSA.-. .- :?,ic,Ll7 .,....�.1:�.:?dh ;1 ;3t1GP`,,. A! I 0?37 +A2a 5l! r T. R' w ', ,�._._--' tom' A t!I i .4 E,' 4 f3'!"i'i`u N 14-1c-D 1'Q "' +j 1 t�"x,,'T`1;'�"1•Bp OD9 ;'r�,�2�'J tJ K '' J?:,�. m k; AlA 1 S112A- 8.30QH 14.90C`-" ,. ,,D0!F' F7AC MA1 '012 0237 C40,3 SE RA'IONA RF1 E'.D N Il 11' t 1002�033 + ,,,i,,,..4,1$414,1^ 146',5 S'1 7,r" A:'C T I O 7-7 Iy ay• A-21„;131-tr vD CR IIMAr1 JA',IE5 W /1 .".,. L1.1J!!it,NUtiI,, 9 a f',,"1 r_tS,+, I" .531 aPA _,. ._!tar),0 ._,.._,_ t''h , 9G7rf. M4 "!o? 0 37 463 'NW J is A TtFIELIS N p-b Ib3 T ad 1 z,.!1 iflp >> 'iJ n' I ;G i`", 1- n t °o- �.,° -.. 5 '_ Y) y. I • 1,' ,, 1 flies,..-! ,. A-2! U1 Ju for'nc 7-i' in •pr',f+" "- 4 Y:u Irl�Pat.l., alt /N 1044ap6 b r/, t 10,50c x`10 '':, 3 53,'C •1 40!13 4237 0901 NE R∎LSEY RFIELD N A-7,S•D 1002 r3'•c,I+t� p.jl', X I CI�1;,P uwa n ..1320 St!, 74TW PaRTLAlI r%AO?N 9% 1 I 1,i a 'j:.,. r.: .• ,.DJUD• ..t ,,�..>J.,.,, `r:_I:?,_;' 0..;,-•J',4E ..�rL.lir"_'-I1,N,A; r.,�7_ �1','tt?'7 i,_ `H j,•'1 Fu�IN12 q 1-X , 2+9.6%I A A;13B1.r?31U.. F'1:4vt,, Rl"HARb Y'.'''FtEL6'- '=rrP' �.,` �•_, ,.«»..F'_,......„..._ ,.. w-a t.,.'... 1-_ _u"., ..,,..., 1- 7 �.I I lJE,,,,1jA15EY A'2t.8. rrU!7u 1;=1iI Ir'1RArt, ICIIA i y • ,,., .'tk p 1115�1a r ,FLt;PUMA•11!3 1'Uft�'LArvfl, 11kkvGN'V 7N.,-5.�� ` ' +'7•� '.•..• �� >•i. a ��"1400 BOROER6, '.;1,'307- (w Bbd-OBE? 1';4 SIf2A ;'i,3-Q� 8 p4;: it"a.;L+t1 F't.rl',a M:':1;1; 4"„ MA1 '>71r:'at?37 1; F1D!F1EL. R1CHA ' 7FIELUi ' ,.7P•O lhl2 `';':`i,' ,In-t.". 14975 clI 'mold A','E'TIGARD, DFi 8ON 1702: 4 13B1-ti'tA0 CABS. CLtFFDRD C ,',mil 1LL011 T1lla Pub11,4 r4;. E~i1 4,1,'5911 033"?,�4,1�,°?Fi -MIld r 3t1J _ 7 FYI' 4, r r, p -4a. -•ita lNq.J,7F AC At l2 r 7 f TF1 A T"I�1 5 '�`R 7?-1i , ,,,,v.,„7 ., ••IOOa O NERA tl W'.Co F� N T1 !.! k . ooI-r,c1i.:`1 a7� 61-I24-'E u kOaft1OR 100 40,200 1.0404 M11 300? (1237 A-ME31 f kotJ Vt0 10 014 r.li�,• TFI-LD r R-7P•O 101E !, '. :;t• ; b.FX woo, HARVEY E 4505 IN BEAJAND DRrrC1TL.N , °REGO 97201 A-213812'370 Lr SEll,,/IJN: v �q t .Vii. ,4 L _ aal-.S-P. 1p: a 9t 120 w1."' ' '-o.,.:!�.SL:.„�a? _ :4(DP-20.i'i7 11500-,W I',H IF'IELG,1� Fi�T - �t'1''L1 �w• . , X k1NUr FAR '�""E»'M �-S ti L°'JAFIA 1710 N 74AN', PET UU -°1N-J: A^$ iil '3 °J 1»ASI-CL1 I"OR a 3DVD GREEN BELT F311ERT 1009-0."00 12!•74 ''RI IHA 100 27.330 F'AWNO CREEK AC 11A1 30J2 0,^37 X CHRISTG'NIEi' iFIELII N. R 7Ja-D Ibl2 0 r P o 901( I 26 FOR LAUD. OR 9, 07 2 s tr •I>-s 1_•-Ok 511. 101120 37, 1-81.191 kiNNON, o.'1•02', VT` A Ni ,,:• � 4 `1C u i � • � ,,.«.�„ .,. " 114,50, 111�.7R 3.44 A� ..�5!! t• 8 A-21zb :LAN>a • 4 l u8,. ,• •u ' _ _-11.x.. � �,,1100 -.,.._..LG ..,a�. _�...y� A.�`�`�=`�r6'G wr' , i 2 Aw LOMMANY r 000' 0 BI,700 �.14 AT 1.3 l30t2 0238 SF FAMONA R7P«b ICU? ,Kr 3,rxw, i �P�0�';333 iGARO, 1XREQd 97223 I 3200 EDW RD E -.V 14 pA w.4 B R O •� 1,120.. 1124.' :QS tia C!'C�L4l �L.*. - r _.0039 F X1,1 , ,„1 qi I3's � r� 1#� » d 97 - A-T-6r= 6, e L .'� �• y wa r »t�IIGO W0ERNDLE, JOHN 1040-0401 (3475 2SII2A •7.700 17,700 "4700 MA1' 3002 0238 0 SW RIOT A C R7P-b' 1102 Drs '�";r'0- P 0 BO% '39 SE aIDE, 07-97t .. A-81301-3400 PETER ER al r 1,1 � J�l R M8 'J FR.t- 0 �7 t A 24,30 t _ �' ' U r Q pp,• , ,.--- ...it„, Ob ,,,630E „A t 1 •-4 :, a 14b3�Nb •VEND TldAtb; iikEZftsN �� r ��t-q '�X yr' r,ti X1 ,, J'°'2717-'TAYLOR, THOMAS F1 925x0973 5/73-5I 12A 79,70u 317.000 '3913,IOL 2,170E i141 012 0238 A- 1 01-390(5 15045 9W 711j A •,� k X14 81111E „,'.{ J i.''tJ�+y� •N •t•, ill•F • I A 1� :.r 251 TAX' R BFI "*3---"7 Qh�� A»21301 36 ��?Y✓ r RW�I Ct� A • , • A.41-..01-36Q1- `IAA*74141 E, `t (RU4 5010 C'I,r 000 DUCK, A H ESTATE 047-0130 18171 -51,120 36.800 56,201 99,600 BBAC M-2 JIB 0239 14095 SW 797 T r y"5•T 2435 SW 07111 PORTLAND OREO••I 97225 �(J" t k, J' J4 �Fi1 A p1 ETi1A,J 0 1 80 100 t a i, 311,,700, t •t rA P' A-21391-3903 W1�. 1NNSO�w1. KE Nr 41 s7�a,gd�!, YJT`r Fid P�'Jin i "3'14`Qr t)A DQaO• ;lj I''al�. 4238. A-2,31;'(":310 G L;`-0710 ,,. 4402 , ,Il,-, SOUTHERN PACIFIC 004-0161 19164 *'07IRA I,944r 1101 3992 1039 14 25 SW 79'H A ! ,7 1 k`�,r, 3011 LIMO) STATION PORTLAND, •REOON P^ 05 , d ItUJ t {1 171 1 •7 7 t,2Q11 A.21391-'3700 H0 L&CHLAOE''r C 1 l`'3 Ike` ( ,01.1 p P `raj �31,:J: .112'0, °' 100 7k.30p I yp PORI t ------' I, 1,';' ",q - ,e71-S-FIRI CT-TrIA1L tire , ut1"`1u .... .Lw`�`L��.. .Ili '11 e" , ai^, A-2(344- �' Fly , K~ .'/ '',,a�� ��p - •• 737 .. I 4-21 - WASHINGTON CO y :I il90J.,.l.1 r,. X .7 r"� ...... _ 0,.!fir.o 1„,,,,, 4•.-,r+, . FY 1 . , h1 •M" al ',If • A . / • ' 4 M 1 .! r. -Y ' .,'- '44,' r...„...\ .' ' 3." o fit a ■ A 4 • I JOHN GORDON GAIN DAVID C.LANDIS rpeo M.Aesi JOE D.BAILEY JEFFREY M.BATCHELOR FRANK A.MOSCATO JOHN C.MEIRCEP Mr. John '.. Skourtes, President National Safety Co. Route 1, Box 575H Beaverton, OR 97005 Dear Mr. Skourtes: cG.I.AIN, LANDIS 8, ..Aisi . . LAWYERS Isle GEOROIA-PACIFIC BUILDING PO RTLA ND, OREGON 97204 TELEPHONE(503)224-6532 June 20 , 1978 -7, , 6 4111 :1.2 i t• ejty n, I d Yr TIGARD In my June 9 letter to you I suggested that if you would furnish additional i- formation on the history of the develcpment and use of the subject property I would again review the question of the applicability of our minor land partitioning process to this piece of railroad right-of-way. You kindly brought to me a document that assigns the railroad' s interest in the Mears lease to National Safety Company, Inc. , and I have reviewed that, along with the documents that are attached to it, and I have again reviewed our ordinance. I have also talked with you at some leagth over the telephone. . . ' It is my opinion that Chapter 1 . 24 Minor Lane Partitioning, . . of the Tigard Municipal Code applies to the tract of lari d. you have pro- posed to develop. I acknowledge that in a vay this tract of land presents an unusual problem. It is apparent that the property was . • leased to Meats before the effective data of the chapter on Minor Land , 1! Partitioning. It can be argued that the railroad's segregating this Atrae.: of land from its other holdings and :,.. asing it to Mears amounted to a partitioning. I have concluded, though, that in this particular *10:- ./ . , instance the leasing of the land to Mears did rot amotnt to a parti- . tioning, The lease 4-0o Mears was for the purpose of the outdoor storage of equipment. It diL not require any development of the land. In my .,. judgment the language of 17.,24.010 of the Tigard Municipal Code ("A 4* it, tract of land or contiguous tracts under a single ownership within . the City shall not be partitioned into two or more parcels for trans- fer of owner3hip, development, or for any other purpose so as to conflict with the requirements of this title. ") still describes the circumstance surrounding your present plans, and requites completion ,A of the minor land partitioning process by your company. . I am sorry that 1 was not able to answer your question in a way that produced the results you wantQ.d. Thank you for furnishing me with 4he assignment of lease. I reti.irn it to you now as an enclosure with this letter. • Very frilly yot(rs , • ,.1/ ' , If _or j 6 se . Bailey JDB/Clg ' 2 cc Mr Raeldon Bavker BncloStre vMtc Dick Bolen . ' .. Yie .‘''.1,':) ''.'.,( 1..,,:, g.,,z- Le, . ,,.' ', ,. , Route 1, Box 575H I have your June 4 letter. I have previously-consi'dered ' , , t to the statement of paragraph 5 of your letter I have replied at ',Ie. ' least thi:ee ilimes to your r,iguests for opinions. As I recall I ,. ,l• : , : 1,4, responded once to a set of reruests you made of Mr. Barker before ,i'„ Mr. Anderson contacted me. Then Mr. Anderson called me and we had ok ' a conversation in which I expressed an opi.nion about the iss'ues that occurred to the two of us during that con7orsation, and then ,' ... , he wrote me a letter out2ining some additional arguments, and in " ,'" ,- .;,' ' response to thFlt I had another conversation with him in which I . ,,, expressed an opinion about the avquments that were advanced at ,.. i ,, ,,,,e, , ,. :, that time. T:len at the meeting o.Y: the Tdgard City Council on June .. ',f., 5 X spoke wiLh Mr. Barker about your suggestion that ORS 92.010 (8) , : should be interpreted so as to cause your problem to fall outside , . ,. t . . ',, -t.t.,e statute' s requirements. I expresse3 my opinion again at that cime. It is true that I have not responded directly to yot, but ) , 0. then that was not the nature of the request that was made to me :- *:i It is still my opinion that neither OW, 92.010 (8) or the . .•,: relevant ordinances of the City of Tigard permit any r:,..,acting other . 0',\ than that the facts that have been presented to me ru to this time place your proposal within the controls of the minor land partition , , , statutes and ordinances. .,!:,.. , , ,,, ii, 0 It',,,,T7 Your letter of June A presents a new suggestion that I 7. ,, Ilad not dealt with before, I am not able to tell enough from your A 1 , ',4 letter to Make a decision based on it, but I do encourage you to . - . provide more information about this sequence of leases. Can you , ','.'',;. t.?,11 Us anything more about the lease of the *parc'el. by William .,10.). r ._., '' Mears? Xs 6 copylpf that lease available? Was it recorded? If g ; - \--, ,v,.,„ it was recorded, can you provide us with the book and page xeference? L ' '''' .' , S flow was the land used during the term of the Mears leasel Vow , to, ':-1 did the Mears lease terminate? Your letter says "This lq.ge was 'o' r,e „. : assigned to National Safety Co. by S,P. when parcel was acquired," ;:',, a 0 Mr. John R. 51'.ourtes, C.P.A. . :; �7unr� 9, 1978 4 , Page 2 ,.., " That seems inconsistent with the first ; .hence of your paragraph u` 1 1. Can you clarify this apparent discrepancy? • ry I Very truly yours ,/ ' Al .411§ , , ,. / 0,--/e/2 • A 94,• w ti ,../ oe D. Bailey JDB/clg ''°'%''` cc Nr�Raeldon Barker .:l, q ,r.. Richard Bolen .b. q ■ J r /'71,1 4�r 4 'c 7 9, �I, fi. M . :4 ; rr '� • 1�... it e M 1'. , `d''��", q� 'iW.W riyip n....••..--.-+ 1 �.4 iii . 4 , r� . i ,� � . " i P" "'GL 4 w4". ,et /. 4 l el )1.r„� 1 a ,✓ ..P g.'-- :.. ,1 tit.- c�P ( ✓ ' .I . ,4( . . ,...)',, 1 ,, , I . .1 .: . , . , ,,,,..,., 1 i . ,., -.7 ..,,c„` .. ..,-. . . ..A r+,w ...... ....'y. T rut +. 'r _____,,,, . ,.. , , - ,,, N. . ...,..„4 . t . .., . ,i ,• .i :'. ., eatioeee v Route 1 Box 575H Beaverton, Oregon 97005 ei June 4, 1978 , Mr. Jo e Ti. Bailey :. • H City of Tigard, Attorney I 1516 Ceorgia-Pacific Belilding I Portland, Oregon 97204 — le , , Dear Mr. Bailey: ;, ,', e One June 2, 1978 a meeting was held between ourshelves and Mr. Raeldon Barker e. % concerning the continued delay encountered by our company in obtaining a building , , permit oa tax lot 4000. He now sees poesibilities why MLP might not be necessary. e! Because of the malicious delays fostered upon us by certain city employees, we e •. , have been forced to fully document this most unpleasaet and costly experience e, with dotailed research to p':otect our interst. . ew 4e askefou as the chief legal officer Of the city of Tigard together with our , , com*itment to justice as a officer of the court; to issue a brief quoting e ' and caee research why minor land petitioning is required for this parcel of laud ..e '.: or to agree with the applicant thet MLP is not required. ee 1, Parcel as petitioned in 1966 when S.P. railroad leased parcel to e, . ..',, Mr. Wm. Mears. This lease was assigned to National Safety Co. by S.P. when parcel was acquired. (see attached map) •, 2, Sale of parcel was approved by S.P„ president November 077. ,e . , . . 3. ORS 92.010 (8), which is authority for Tigard's ordinance states that , ,. . adjustments of lot lilies (1.0P.b not coastitute partition land. (see attached) ev 4. Tigard's ordinance 18,C4.030 access and regress reads for a industrial . . :, erect 30'access is required, Property has 30 deeded road froattge on Bonita Road, lease rights up to 15'additional feet as required from S.P. (agrees with ' '.., ORS 92,010 (8) minimum lot size) l' ) , Attorney Fred Anderson wrote you a brief dated April 10, 1978 further el. : clarifying why mix) not required. This has been collabierated by one other legal opinion. (no reply ever received from you) .e— d 6. Washington County bureau of records and maps have stated that this parcel WQS petitioned in 1966, (no MLP required) ee 14. Pareel in question was alway geographically' separated (has natural boundaries, road, creek, railroads) E. Tignrd MLP ordinance not legally in effect until Januar!, 1978, (not (; 4 *,. V e.' recerded as requited by state statute, eleven plus years after this parcel was petitiofted„ ee...., , u , Page 1, Continued e „ • . ' 1.. ..., , , . . . •,..;':;.):.:' ' , . , . .,!■V . . . .„. . . . . ,f 't•'.1 . ,I,.. . • . ., • , . '4; . . . , . . ' . . ..., . . 2 lette to Mr, Joe Bailey 4, 1978 . . . .2,...:; . . 1 . ' . . .. .. , . . . . . • . . . . ‘,. • , : ....,,. , . . . . . . We. 4.re confident upon carefully revievng the above points you will state • . .. tht, KLP not required. • . .,'.., ., Because of the b.Irdensome del rep aya we amk for yor ly within five . , The v „ty employee Mr. Laws who was most instrunental in stalling applicant has ., now reigned'per Mx. Barlrer. The other key employee of the eity Mr. Walden has nov retacteN1 his statem-nt (May 9, 1978 taped ineeting on aceiss/egress. . ,.0 , ',. :... 4 " He nov statesfi " nal Authority rests with Vashi Cpun ngton y 41, This authority .,.: ,,..7 has issued driveliiay permit #8048. .,„.:., r. . „ . . ..,. „ . incerely, i l', . . . ,,;.1,1".....— ,i ", '''''::',:,k4c'18'1.-■ •• , . . . . Natlional Silex.,y Co. ..-,'$.': , : ..:.. . , by John R. Skourtes . jRS/v.r. Pr ' esident encIst ... .-, . . , ..,. , . '3'.,'■ , . l'....' '.. A, , , Mp Of 1966 partition . . ,. ..,, OuS 92Jao . . . Tigard' ordinance 18.64.030 . ..,,., . t.---letter ft'*vm Mr. Fr :'..1 Anderson to Mr. Joe Bailey, dated April 10,1978 c ". " .y., „ copiek,Vto Mr. Fred Andetson, Attorney !•..,, ---i,"1,' Mr. Raeldon Barker,, city manager City of Tigard ., City aoune$J, Oity. of Tigard (/t) 1-1y00,. a)v)op . . .. , i.,. . ■ . .,.....,. , , . , , . . , .,. ... , . .. ' ; ■. ,',,''',i'i' ' , ' . ' , . ,•, :4111 . . , , . . ., . . , ii!'...-.'"1 '' . . , . , . . , , .. , . ••,;• ., . . . . : . . : . „ „ .. ,',:•'4 .. ,, . . . , , . „.4 . ' . . , . , . . . . . . . : . , . , . : . . . , -:-..,0. :f:,._,..' ' ' :1.1'.'17::! . t•tri.0-, ..41,.7...,ri..,,,,,i,,... ...4,,,,,,' :-' ,';,,,,;;,..,.4,...-:, -A.,..,,,.''. .-::,:'-'--:. .. . . ., .).,,:bn,,,'';,.,■„r`,.,:','.'''''V,?..,..',''',. . _,'::_:,,,;1:.■..''fi,',..•", '1::',‘: '1i.V.,:-'4'.. '.''' '''.,:,:r ,„, _ ___ _________ ____________________ -I'.. oi. ,... ttr,:t i! . i'...-.. . '■,: i' l ■ A'•• 4 4 - 4'd / -,,,:.-•:.:^.• . ,, , ANDRSON, OrrimAN & ANDERsoN , tATTORNMYS A'r LAW ,.., TIGARD PROMS*IONIAL, CE.:1\1"1 Z.R .. SSOS S. W. CENTV.R STREE-T *, . P. 0. e OX 23006, TIGARD, OR'ZGON ,,,, .......... S30.1121 ; FRET). A, ANDVRSON April 10, 1978 DMRRYCK' H. DITTMAN 0, FOR 74% ANDMRSON t lie'* ' T ','. . . t . ' ' ''.. Mr. Joe D. Bailey ; . ...'1.,, Attorney at Law .. P. O. Box 399 , ... Hillsooro, Oregon 97a23 ..., ,.,,% Dear Joe As indicated t.o you on the telephone last week, I have been ,l requested to assist John Skourtes in connection with the rroblem 2, ,., arising from the small tract abutting upon S. W. ?onita and inter- ^.' ,%. vening between Southern Pacific right-of-way and S,P & S right-(4- 1, way . , , „,•• Whil s. you indicated that :ryou felt that the minor partitioninc” requirements or Chapter ,.7 . 24 of the Tigard Municipal Code were .,., ..,:;*, applicable here, you also stated that if I had a different OryihAIM 'e:nd could give you a reasonable basis for the outlook that Mr , , Sx-ourtes is entitled to a building permit without minor partitinin :. 0 . ...k. approval, you would consider it . , ;(:,.: Review of Section 17, 24 , 010, in light of the factual situation ./.:, involved here, gives rise to the viewooint that approval of p,:',,rti - 'S , tioning is not required in this instance for the following), reason:' : .‘, .,,, ... 1. Section 17 . 24 . 010 , in pertincint part , is quoted: ' k\''', • o, 1'0. 1 "A trac'',., of land or contiguous tracts under single ,,.0.1 owner ship within the city_ shall not be partiAoned , into two or more parcefs for transfer of ownership , :+4, tr',...; development or for any other purpose so as to con- .;. flict with requirements of thit. title . ' Ir..,: , 2 0 .: As you know, thL Southern Pacific ri( ht-of-way ti:Kten,w. ., ,. . intercity) int6rcounty, interstate and perhaps tnternational v and does not fP.,11 wholly within the City The normal tay lot '.• or tract designation with vespect to other ownershipJ does . ,,..4, ,..,' not aPply to railrood right-of-way or utilities which ory assessed and taxed by the State Department of Revenue, mi.t.J1cp . than by Washington County. The tax lot philosorhy, thi::refove , *cannot have pertience in this instance ., , . •., :, 'vela'' • k. . ,..'k ( .',.. .10-.0', • ,.., .,.. t-: . •.- ‘i'17.7—T'''':' ; ' '4' * ' ". '' . • t.'''0.''. ''''''''N, , 't, "I *',..,', . ' • , . ,, +'P ..., *,, ,"'. t i,./,F,j, .,,;.,., 1 •'--.,, , Mr. Joe D. Bailey April 10, 1978 Pa gka ? ,..,, 2, The Skourtes tract with which we are concerned is ,.. .,::„.., within the city bUt It qualifies and has; qualified a ' 1 an ownerrp .entity separate and apavt from the rail- '..4.,.,' road ' riht-of-way cu.:, shown on. the assessment map of .„:„... .,./., . Washington County, a take-off copy of which 1 have . ...., , attached for your ready reference, and as such nas been . ? in ,existence lori g. prlor to the enactment of Orainance '...'.-..,: % 68. 48 of the, City of Tigard and its cuunterpart Ordi- , , nance 74-3. , ..,,, . .,.. , l, fPutting this into its proPer prospective., inamuch as there is not, involved partitioning o the railroad rlt-of-way, but t've ein- , . 1 ,,; tence of a r tact has been a fact 2ong prior to the Rdoption of .,..: tne ordinances , and the peculiar circumstances of the, ownershit) g 41 and' asseSsment facts , 1 feel that the minor partitioningrequirQ- 1 . .. li t no app are ments ..,./ . t cable. , ' In aly event , ! reqaest that you point out to the Plannin peoplo.., . , 4..: . . that the delays inhopent in. obtoining site plan review and isr:av_J;1,,..., ','..... of oulIding permit shouad not thwart orderly development of an obvious sitution such as this where the applicant can easily ,...'Y., suppert h view :that he is being sinzied out for special treat',.;6...:t ;‹, by reason, of ' previous probleMs with the city, and in any event of -.4.. , '4. Onable doubt of the applicability of the reculation, the matt;op - should he resolved iu faVor or the applicant under normal statutwo _.. ,...4, . guidelines , , Very truly lours , ,., ANDERSON, DTTMAN & ANDERSON ..,..-. .,..... ... Fred, A. Anderson cc : John Skourtes 1 i..,.. .. , . , . . . , ! . , . , ...Ie.., . , ■,■:', , , ■ , : , , . ,...,"'■:,,,,., , -, , : , ,..' ,, , '--,-.. , , ;'.'''''' i,r7!rrtrr.7,7'7rrv777T7trI771::;:', r. '": 17,7t7Tf:,7777"T::777",',.'i;-.'''''','Aj- '''''4';.::i.,:r.'-'V'. '.':,,v10'::.:,'k.•..''::k-:-. ,-:..,. .„ ..',,Y1-1,ftr%-.,:',..,_.-'::,,,,H ��. +r ' /"„ rt .,-.74'.7."-;` ! , .�.wlgtirCt"-..N�r;,..- ..k".�y�•�,•dr,,7 r.,xm•-+•a};.1,r,,� 1" nM 'ii.,� „),:+I+n --.w., r-. + , ..,.- .tl 'I •t'.. "r i «Y « u r'y.. ',1�' ;t,t t a"' - ''W: „ ., a ,r'." 4i 7,:,',,,' .. p s I[ t' n � ,.. vn ys. 'm v y, � i� ,.i. - �' r +'.ti. ,r ,. �'r f ttt��.. �11� �� ,� '� I. �- r 4Adl• . ._,.. pgWMWYrII. M' ,ASYe`JSYYmW Y, 0. 11 ,,,.., l, •e _ riT— T17TTr•�•. t � p � ' 1G.,µ •rCJy "'D�Y. ry_+°'c , •k •'„Vr•, r A P x' S; ,dn'f''4 , p v Dr rr f,.' ;l� 1 " h t'....,......,,,,...,.. t f M�,�d ry ,. 'tI P SY sr �� P d I g„;t; r•. t .4-T.,` !24..4,#14'/G'a'4'/'C'- '�Tr+_��"'" '�°p"++h gru..° 1:;4:'p�" ,l'1°7"'k 1. ' „�`....n S^r`. ;to ',ya 'y' t >, � +' YII� w..nt:L:"i 2 T' 2::�rTSea" LS::t6:1LSfu:: . n,.,"......rw. rr t I�L + ,f"' 3�!I.�iSII2'.uS M'.X1.4 g ' t www+.w.r.ww•r...,'r.•.� M.r.+rlr+..rw.., w•..v ++«+""r.••.0 'r]T*'l, ..w' ,r - '" +' .r.•' � '' _ ,n, . -- "�� "m,r 4• "w�r N"'"`...'u.i s 3.�-: $r •+ „- 4rl�' .3 0 5 \v:j 'I ? . k , F r ` n r-�"u Gin ti3. y x C7 ‘::.,111,, 1 Y . ., ".at+rT%r•Vy r '-':v., , , —....,,,...,,,.. '-, :, • J) �' � • ' , x , ` .,"1.,,,:‘1 It " • / ' ' SOUTH Etl' N PAC!`t I , PACIFIC I—I.ru rig"' � '°r k? LE CNO i v *�7"i4•,!..1aNtd�sn'vy I,, "' + "— r 4 .�:LL.OL.i1Y�rh sbows leCJ3e ►` vtl' V,r' /1 <at ,,4:14', V .r— _._,.•r..:.;�hpWs $(P Co, r'r�ner` 9 line, ° "' f + ..l.:eexis�' i''ar.si'n 4 S t'a/ K/yr ''f17c'', t r'"I Y, , t +; „ , it �'a. �,t :;.,..,,...\. L 1 A i; •A 1 y r' ,::,,,..,,,::....,,,,,':.....:,,,.„,,::,,.:...:4,,,t,,..s'','".4,,-,...:.1',..',.4'..:,,.'..,...‘.,..:,.',:,'''''..4.':,,.:..,;.:,''''''..,.''''''''.1.'.:1••.,'.4'4:,'.1'.,.4,.'•,'.",,''''..'....„r."',:: R • M • i "' ' 'L • N t " �'; if • y (•i.' f ; a ) I • ,,, 1 t I :.`' f Il - la �y l'",",1' 7 r I p Y 1 + it• 4,.,' ,,F ! • V' •I' • ! u t'I t d• v 1� ' {.1 C i r r Y c ,i%r""r :.y_r".'""' _.'7, _.... - ._• """" •.d : "••— .. -..!..".. 'Yx.l.rn-"m..,•.._. _.,_._... -1_.--+'" lV 1'n;;'. Y ��� _. ...*''',".'..4..,'t L.,;..._ •_ _ -___ ... ... ._r''ciYo ..._p . p ei , ,, '""q/417 ''' ! / S.* 1 6 '21*-74 ( ,ii:ii' iyide NN FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a corporation, successor in interest, to Southern Pacific Ccrmpanyr hereby assigns, transfers and sets over d',, unto NATION. .T, SAFETY COMPANY, INC. , a corporation, all of the right, tithe and interest of Southern Pac' ' ic Transportation i Company in and to that certain lease datec. ,`ctober 27, 19 6 6 , between ';" the predecessor to Southern Pacific Transportation Company, as Railroad, and William, M. Mears, an individual, covering the leasing ,;' ` ,,':', of certain premises located at Cook, Clackamas County, Oregon, ':�, for the open storage of machinery, in the location more particularly ,` indicated on the print attached thereto and made a part thereof.. ' The original counterpart of said lease dated October 27, 1966 , 1. which is filed In the records $f Southern Pacific Transportation ' Company as Lease Audit No. l519P5, is attached and made a part hereof, 1':, This assignment shall he effective as of the day of , 197y''. Dated at :„. ,, « ,. • , California, this ' , day of ; 197.', „ • # SOUTHERN P ACIF? I TRANSPORTATION COMPANY 1. ,i� ,C2y_ F r.... ......:«•.,+...wWw... .1....rw.».�...........Llu .1.�..�...... ' ;' The undersigned, NATIONAL SAFETY COMPANY, INC. , a corporation, ;:� hereby w. .epts the above assignment and agrees to be bound by all n': ,;, of the terms, covenants and cone itions in said lease. a5 , F ` , NATIONAL SAFETY COMPANY, INC. ,fit,, By -- , 1. (Title) , .1r I } ,1cc 'l' , ., r, ,f, w ' a :1 ti 4, i' I', ,.r ..� t.,,:: i ,.� �rx ? �_;'. 1.`4:'.!_ ;1 } � 1 �'t v.` i' .�. r 'r._. 't }:,/ ,i.'t afi 1 ��, 1 . j• ..., , ',.•,: ;,..::. 51 9 b b ' S221 ,\ 3623M .,. . (Approver!aa June o form by Ouncral Comm! SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY ':%•,'" ... . ,..;.1: /:Z. .. . COMMERCIAL LEASE NC- , , 19 66 . e al/to /rage made and entered into this 7/76Si'day of (1 .4-30- -.4-'— f ,•••,. ':',.'• by and between the SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY,a corporation herein called"Railroad,"and ,. ,et., ,es ,,i.. WILLIAM M. MEARS, an individual, addrs - 3440 SW 90th Avenue, Portlanel: ' Oregon, , .'c herein,ealled "Lessee." #ei ..,, , Viisesseset4: That Railroad hereby leases to Lessee the premises of Railroad at or near Cook ". - .„, .„ ..... _ - - - Station,County of Clackamas ,State of Oregon ,shown .,e'e, ossac*igAiisssitlekystrucialtissessupon the print hereto attached, .....:,04,........, ,I.,... 't .! for the term of one year from the 15th clay of A4'3"-a-titt ,1966 -ex , upon the following terms and conditions se. ;Re 1. Railroad reserves for itself,its suaessors,assigns and liceneeee,the right to conetruct,maintain and .'''''' '#,?, '';';; operate ens existing tracks and emisting aed new or additional pipe,telegeaph,telephone and power transteds- ish, ,,,,,,,, il'4 sion lines upon,over and beneath the leased premises. isi z' ...,..e.-, Lessee hereby aRailroad V to the leased premises, and agrees never to assail , e.' resist said title. „e -:,,,k :i!,• ../: 2. Lessee agrees to pay rental at the rate of - TWO HfirNIMD - - - - - - - - - 4. ', .... -Dollars (Ill 200.00 ) ;...- ' ,c;,,, :■....'‘' Per annum payable annually in advance.,If such rental is payable on aenonthly .,ve backs and the effective date hereof is other than the first day of the month,then the ren sal.will be prorated from re, see effective date to the first day of he following full calendes month, Any privilege, sales, gross income or other tax (not including income tax) imposed upon the rentals herein lirovided to be paid by the Lessee,or upon the Railroad in an amount measured by the rentals received by Railroad,shall be paid by the Lessee,in addition to the amounts get forth herein whether such imeosition . ee., el tax be hy The United States of America,the state in which the leased premises are located,or any hubdivie sion(Jr municipality thereof, e... 'S. 3. Said premises shall be used by Lessee solely and exelueively for the open stox age of machinery Lessee agrees to comply with all applicable laws and regulations withreepect to the use of the leased premises, see e.ee ..., . ee... if the Lessee does not,within ninety (90) days,commence the use of the leased premises for the pUrposes ,,sse e:11 herein mentioned,or if the Lessee discontinues such use ror a period of ninety (DO) days,the Railroad may at ise s its option terminate this lease by giving fifteen(15)days' notice in writing to the Lessee,in which event the previsions of Seetion 7 hereof,relating to refund al.rental,shall apply. ...e. ..:,U .,....., Lessee agrees not to pile or sere or permit to be piled or stored upon the leased premises, within 100 feet tS ,.., V the nearest railroad track,arty gunpowder,dynamite, Faeoline or other explosive substance or material, ssiS -_"--.. .1. Lessee agrees to keep the leased premises'tan all buildings and structures thereon free from rubbish ., ant in a neat and cafe condition and satisfactory to Reilroad.Lessee shall maintsdn,at Lessee's sole cost and Se ese expense,in good condition and repair,satisfactory to Railroad,all buildings and sixtieth,us upon said leased 11r.41ges, except ti use owned by the Railroad.The leased premises and buildings and serer tures thereon shall 'es. lait'.ie used for displaying signs and notices ether than those connected with the busbies!, of Lessee content- us, ''t.:P.■, , pitti.ed by this lease.Such notices and signs shall be neat and properly maintained. Itailreed shall have the :,se . i is ht to enter the leased peernises at reasonable times to inspect the same, S. Lessee agrees to pay, before they become delinqu•nt, all taxes and assessments againie., the leased ,s „ premises,or which r tight beebtne a lien thereon,by oaten'of any buildings,structures or other property,real. 1. or Pereonal,on the leased premises(except',hose owned by Railroad),or by reason of Lessee's activities,Rail- :eS' eve see, road may at ite option pay such taxes or ys.Amments,and such ptaemen Is will be repaid by Lessee on demand. illi' 0. In the event beseett shall not promptly correct any default by Lessee hel'eLlildel";ate)."toeVipt of notice of siieli default from Railroad, Railread shall have the ri 1.4 te terminate this least forthwith and to retake g ., so.. 1‘. possession of the Mtal'il pretelses,Waiver of any default:Mall not be construed as a=IVO"of a subsequent or (*Mt itIllitlg default,Termination oi` this tense Shall not efrovt, any liability by reason of any act, default or ,..1. ocCtirreneo nrior to StIoll t('rillittait4011. / '■';70' ..." , Kit h(.1'pal ty hereto may terminate this lease upon thirty MO)days'Written notice to tilt,other party, To the tAeitt:of such termitnitien by Railroad.the proportion of rent paid in advance alineable to atty priud at;.or lilts termination date Chi all be etefunded to Lessee. ':'t.:! . , . , ...... , L. , ' '.::. ....':,,.' . ..•,,-, •.•:•'.',. i•'''.*,'.:;!,; '..::,:'','--::'::.'','':,::'::4*-; • : ::: ' '., y ,.;1 8. Upon.the expiration or termination of this lease,or any extension or renewal thereof,Lee without , further notice,ehall deliver up to Railroad the possession of the leaned premises,Lessee,if not in de�'arlult here- ., ` under,shall be entitled,at any time prior to such expiration or termination,to rereove from the leased prern•. te ises any buildings or structures wholly owned qty'Lessee. Lessee shall restore a did leased premises to the ,,, condition in which they existed at the time Lessen took possession,Utno.i the failure or refusal of'Lessee to ;, '1:t e, remove from the leased premises all buildings,structures and all personal property owned by Lessee,prior to the expiration or termination of this tease said buildings,structures and'aersonal property shall thereupon, ,. ( ij t }.b Via' r,: at the Jption of Railroad,become the sole preperty of Railroad,or if Raileottd so elects it may remove from ,'; the leased premises any buildings,structures and other personal property owned 1-y Lessee,and Railroad may t, • also restore the leased premises to substantially the condition in which they existed at the time Lessee took i;.a. ''>ti i',; possession, all at the expense of Lessee,which expense Lessee agrees to pay Railroad upu°r demand. In the ,;r; event of such failut•e or refusal of Lessee to surrender possession of said leased premises,Railroad shall have c.; a the right to re-enter upon said leased premises and remove Lessee,or any person,firm or corporation claiming ''''• by,through or under Lessee,therefrom. ,• r 9. Lessee shall not construct,reconstruct e. titer structures of any character upon the leased premises y,•; without the prior written consent of Railroad, 1, see shall not commence any repairs (excel,' erne.eenc.y ' repairs) until fifteen (l.bj ays a?t r written notice el Railroad. -'Lessee further agrees not •o install or extend any electrical wires in any Railroad-owned improvements ,i on'Ithe leased premises without the prior written consent of Railroad, '! >, 10. Lessee agrees to pay for all wster, gas,electricity and other utilities used by Lessee on the lees ,l premises. 0 .; 11, Lessee willfully pay for all materials joined or affixed to the leased premises,and pity in full all per- ;k.; -,. : sons who perform labor upon the leased premises and will ,,ot suffer any mechanics`or mater•;alien',;liens of t any kind to be enforced against the leased premises for any work dune,or materials furnisher.,at the Lessee's ; 'in.stance or request.If any such liens are filed thereon,Lessee agrees to remove the same at Lessee's own cast °• and expense and to pay any judgment whlnh may be c;ael red thereon or therein der,Shoulc'a the Lessee fail, neglect or refuse so to do,Railroad shall lu,ive the nigh t to pay any amount requir:d to releaue any such lien or liens,or to defend any action brought thereon,and to pay any judgment enterea therein,and the Lessee shall ,s be liable to the Railroad for all costs, dab ages, and reasonable attorney fees,anti any amounts expended in defending anypr'oceedings,or in tl,e payment of any of said liens or any judgment obtained teerefor.Railroad • ,,;.;`4 may post and maintain upon the leased premises notices of nm-i-responsibility as provided by law, r 12. In ease the leased premises or any part thereof are in either the State of Arizona or Utah,Lessee will give Railroad and l'',e lessor of Railroad,before allowing any construction,alteration or repair to be done upon ',* the leased pren tees,a bond satisfactory.in form and amount and to i e issued by some surety company to be ,' a, appiovedbyIta•,'road,conditioned that heLesateeshall pay or cause t obepfud all contractors, sub-contractors, .:;'<<:; laborers,operatives and other persons who may labor or furnish labor, materials or tools in the performance .',.-e, of such constr}',[ion,alteration,or repair. „S. 1,. e 13, Lessee agrees to repass and indeniniiyftaileoad from ,and against all liability,cost and expense for ie , 1' lass of or damage to pro- �•ty and el injury to or deaths of persons (including,but not limited to the property and employees of each onete hereto),when arising or resulting froth: 't4 t?! (a) The use of said premises by Lessee,i is agents,t mplo;i ee'.ia:invitees,or ' gut , (h) breach of provisions of this lease by Les me . . '`- whether nr not caused or contribu�'ed to by any:lei,or omission of Railroad,its employees,agents, contrite- ati tore,suboontractor's or their emplo,;'ees or agents,or any other person, w: V Th'e term"Railroad" as used In this Section W.shall include the successor's;assigns and affiliated com- ,,;( parries of.Railroad and any other ailroad company operating upon Railroad's tracks. �.•.;,; Lessee, upon request, will provide Rallc oad with pc-lifted copies of insurance in form and amounts satist- .,1,• , . I insuring �1 x 1 x , agreement. t•. factory to Railroad, the liebili,�y of Lessee under this l.�l, In case Railroad shall successfully bring suit to compel'performance of,or ro recover for breech of, a a any covenant,agreement or condition herein written,Lessee will pay to Railroad reasonable attorney fees in ':` tulditioti to the amount of judgment and costs. s •5 case r (except by Railroad) , r�' deprived possession f the '' t,�, Inn rinse I. :ie shall (e±:e.t in b5 l�ailronrll Irr law atr1�tlepri�erl o!the lnn,se;s;�ior_ of:tlnt, leased poem- ! ises or any part thereof, Lessee shall notify 1Lailroeii in writing, setting forth in.full tho. circumstances in , relatlori.thercto;whereupon Railroad rimy.et ii,s'�ptian,either install Lessee in po s"ssion of the leased poem- ' , corn •r Lessee the a unexpired a isee,or terminate thin;lea tee and ratted.to Lessee the pair rata.amount,of the rectal for the line xpired term of hi: the tease after the receipt of such notice,whereupon no claims for damages of whatsoever kind or character ,4�. , inctu red by Lessee by reason of such dirspossession shall he chargeable against Railroad. •')' ' i 1(i, Ire ease Lcsseet holds over the term of this lease,with the consent of Railroad,,nu,it holding over shall ,1; he deemed a teimney only front,month to month,and a,pon the same terms anti ciunditi,'ats its heeeie stated. ,, ie ,' :; 11, Any notit'e to he given by l'atilroad to Lessee herein-ides shall he deemed to be properly serve» ,f d.° delivered to Lessee,or if deposited in the post office,postpaid,adtli essed to Lessee at the leased premises or r tfe to last known''u.ldress, rt`, Time and Specific°performance are each of the e.-sense of this lease. le I ; � et a' agrees, ti) alto Or' Place n c hiner3i upon said t, r na V: t1 n 100 Xeet a wy g + iron Railroad*lroad'�•Z,tesa.,c.to, es .7r t..�` '.* C�_ r..,.� .. �., ;,a e.�. b`.,. i ....... ' ... v e ; w 41..''‘'iii..,''',.::,,'. ' 1. . '..' 1 v' �/'7!.1'i .•_iy�_y' "'. , . .. . ' . ' , ,.,yr .,..k:'j,* ': -'''1 . ,,,',,i■:7:■,:„k":■I . .. ,171"' r 4 ' ' Q,4,,,, A„, , 19. bessee agrees not to store or place machinery upon said .,P".. .-„,.• ', premises within 100 feet of the adjacent public roadway crossing Railroad's tracks and vroperty that wifl in any way pair .,:,,c. motorist view conditions of approaching trains, engine or cars of Railroad. 20. Lessee shall provide a certified vz.opy of an insurance policy, 7' terminal/A° only after ten (10) days' notice to Railroad, with limits not l'Ims than $300,000/750,000 Bodily Injury and $700,0001100,00Cri Pro- perty Uaxe2ge, which policv shall insure the contractual liability ;:,:,:,,,,,; assumed by Lessee 4ader this lease Should Lessee carry Workmen's Compensation insurance, Lilssee ,':,....,..i hereby agrees to amend said insurance, waiving the right of Subro- gation against Railroad, except where state laws prohibit such waiver. it is agreed that the limits of insurance specified above are ,.•'. !';',. the mini zmvu amounts required by Railroad and shall be subject to revision from time to time. ..:,:,:4;.'.,'!1 • ;,:;',.!'-`',A :.;,:."': , 1!:t•A'llt!'l ..,. .' ,.. THIS LEASE shall inure to the Itenetn,of and be bireng upon the heirs,administrators,executors,suc- cessors and assigns of the parties hereto,but shall not be tusigned or subleased by Lessee without the prior written consent of Railroad. ....1: IN WITNESS wileREOF, the parties hereto liar e executed this lease in duplicatA the day and year first above vt--4.rdn. ..i.,,■';'■ SOUTIIEEN PACIT'IC COMPANY Superintendent, '•,"..,?,!! WITN.T1SSED 13 : 50- , ., : . 5...4....e-,'.,....7 f7.,. (See NOte5Willittin 6.' 1k4m1Le'ssee) ....... , , DESCRIPTION CORRECT: 10,',1P Division Flo ce,lneer . ,, ,, r '',,e.,::., It III lkkaPutated I.:klitit;t0W,11.1411e,nliould bt.v0,1;t0 1,,,,III lattlitlit0;;I:i4V1 t.i'tv,■r.30d (III 11111 inth;Its,,1411 I,,,e ■iqr am, A.,■■Ll be wiltivoid lit III,tittploYeti of lidroad,a iitaah.d.w,if;;;4,by a,thavuotsted patty, .1 ; 1. . ' ,'; ,et' • , , ', -,..,• ...,,te* ,,, ,, .° 'xi,-* l'i -,•1L, .,,t ,, *e, .. ''., , * , . , . — ' •.:-,, ''...., i, ;,X,,, f. , . . ,„11 .;;. ,. • 4 . rriercolviikpovt, \\ ,,----r---1,,---v--,,t--rrT,ire.,-,--"--,- , „ '' —7-772A747:374C,EN:Mr1;sr,OMMOIWe--""Villia!, '''''.,,'"'Y'''''.''',:,ir,71,, ,,,,,,,.,„,„ , ,„,„,, . ,,, ,, „,-. t, ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,, ,,,,, ,, , „,,,. ,, ,- 'o ' • 004.0,44,40,4$00.0.1..v....0.,,(4.-04,.*,,,,,,..40,04.0.40,4040,444440,01,As..4.4...0.04....i,., , -0,,,,,,,-1,,,,,,,,,,,4 ,10.,0"7.1.0". / , , ,1, , . . „ ,7; I , , .r,-). 1 , ;0, (( , ,, ,ei 1 r '' , 9 , , i , i , ,,,,t ; , 0 . .. t il Ti , 1 oti \I I g ' I . .:'•' ' •",, 4 ' 1 (41 tA r'll I 1 lit .) /.. :1,/0 it.„ i ''''r ' . „ ; „/„9,., is i t. ...., I 1 I 4, "-,-, p,N , tit\i' • '• ',1 c,,) n, ''''''''''^ 4 t' 0,1)1,.) I '.:. 4 ,,,.. 4.,,,,,,... 1 i ' 1 i :*•,) ft 1 .r rt 4, ot. , ... ',..•' ,".. , . ,. ...., ■ , . I , ' 5, '.4■ , , . ,,, *:1,,IP; ,. ■ Pi, l ' I , I ‘1,..„ ;1 ..■,4, ,..t. . t • / i ,.. -._10 . • ,.,A, ...:,,•';,,,,,, ,h, ,,1 ,:. .,,„. .• ' I t,, ,..o ti".4 ' '1 1S ,, f,,5 v, ,...'i ,t,„) ,t ,I.". ' 0 1111 c,:, I VI I t , Not /4. 1 1 t r.,4 III i -, , - , i r• ,.•, 4:,,., ...,,,,•,e.',. ""ri i 1 ,,,...... 4.V4,4_,„, ' ,•,, ',•.'; ... > ,,,,•7','. /I , / 1 I 4 \ Of b 1 ' ... t 1.,› ,,,,•,.'I,',., ill ., - •' e it .. ...., ..,. I, ...,0 ,. ,,,,,..,... . f , r 1 I , 1,-A.- 4. '.4 '.:," :':•., iii 1,1- ,,Wit,',#,Liikritigati4t4.4 1 ASS' '71 I '',....'..-..'.. 0.,1#. ..,.. 7 ':'[1.,' z3 v.' in C: '7,,,! 1.----------4 111 " lart3. SS' G.A.15' Ctne, A / ' t X , 1'1' 111 1 . / .,,,,,it,■, 7.1 / i 1.1 ' . . I i 11 ' . ... T I i ' ,,,,',!.-■ •••• .▪ ,,,,,,k ry ,,,,,,,, 0 ,,,,,, •f '.."'",,,,,,t;',,,,,Z 1 ..C."‘;' ,.;:. M 1 C■ * ;:',, ...A, '4 ii rti .,« '''•,. ' > • ., , .. ' ..,• '-,,,4 w 41 M '''' I X (") 4a ir • t• ..', •'.,...ft'. • t .;(3 ''*••••'..."' '• . :11 ' '' 0 t" N AI ''' • I 0 o .. .,, . Ail '.,,......,.,... 1\3 n -ri , , z , .. ., ••••i, ,, , ...„..w....-----.--....--ir.m.,—...4........o.........y.,........,....i......wh.., 4,..... 40„,.., ay.........4maww • 3,,,, • , j •ir i';,. .‘. ' ' '''7',.'■.' ' ' .. ,•'.•k 4. ,,, , . t`':,'.'',1 •, • ,:•,7.'''''4 . •'., ;., ,,.,:' - . . ` ; ,„*,,I,116. atA10141:4V•i,r,iii, air,,*'Av.41;•,4,4::lbj.:!3•Nrg."44,0i.V::;f4',,,,zoi,;' ,A,A,;,,'g, . '';4; -,,i,;,;"1,4';:,;,:!.,,,,,,.ii.1',,q,,i,e;,:,;,4,,, ,..1-,0,,,:*;',,, '',-„,,,,,,, I .1 r.--- 7...--.) t,.?, -tti,:ii KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORT- ■,:+ .; i:.'',',',P'-' ATIOU COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, qrantor, in consideration of $13d500.00 paid to it, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and oAnvey unto ,,::,„k: , NATIONAL SAFETY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, a corporation, Grantee, and its ',,....,... ;';' successors anti assigns, that certain real property', with the tenements, 1,, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonGing or appertaining, , situat 6 in tne County of Wash4.nyton, State of Oregon, and more parti- ,''':', !",,t ;,,- cularly described in Exhibit A, attached and hereby made a part hereof, qubject to easements, covenants, conditions, reservations and restrio- , • Grantor excepts from the proper,:y h4)reby conveyed that portion lo thereOf lying below a depth of 500 feet, meas1.1',A vertj.cally, from the •,.:.• -:,L ./ contour of the surface of said property; however, Grantor or its suc- cesuor- and assIgns shall not have the rLqht for any purpose whatsoever to enter upon, ir.o or through the surface of said property or any part '.:,..0,;'. , thereof lying between said surface and 500 feet below said surface. ,' '. « :'%,',: — TO HAVE ANr TO HOLD said property unto Grantee, and its Successors . • A In construing this deed, the singular incl.udes the plural as !Ale ..:,-;..' The forogo.l.ng recital of considwmtion is true as Grantor verily believes, and is Lhe true and actual consideration paid. i,z, -,''.'• IN WITN28S WHEREOF, Grantor has caused these present's tc be .4 • :.':',)` executed this .....eva. day LIr , ,Amt_____ r 1978. 1) 80writTERII/ rcpC IANSPOHTATION COMPANY 0. , Attest . ") - 1, / Alitit BY 5x6,(,, i'v11/1,, ':''',,i,. 1 t spy •Y t; , "" I) "�` '�„p westerly o?'-the following dAscribLd like: 1 _,.1• , 1 „ t beginning s ' Q°•� � COMMENCING at c:he raoin�.. of bc� innin of � the ,�ab4�ve, c1E..ac,�',Y..i�1E,.d v 1.28 acre parcel of land; , thence South 17° , 19 ' . 00,T Last ,.along a • Lane parallel with ` and distant 1,southwesteriy 50•.Q:,.fee ,, :: a., 1 measured at right angles, . from t'the cente '•,.1.:ine of 'Southern .. 1:L' ' t< - O.'t' Pacific Transportation Company' s main' track. (Til1c look.'Branck7� e.,A ,-„ being the easterly. line of said .1. 2 t acre .aar.ei. ..of.,land, •.47.'5,4,0 "ti '. feet to a point distant southwestorlvc 10.'0 feet,,:imoasur_ed,,at ` • ri.ght.. anc.:see, from said center line of-main tract atA,E,nganecr., Station 5l5+15. aria the .TRUE TRUE POINT v. •BEGINNING .ofi..:the line, to be j g ':t described; thence South 17°° 19 ' 00”, Fast .along said parallel line, 170 feet to. the southerly terminus of.•J.in,.-herein.:described. . ' The side Lines of the ' abcve,described :15 .0 foot,.wi.de ,� t ;' strip of ],;iqc1 terminate in lines• drawn at•.ra.gh ..:angles..from,tie `'' ,,.... above-described line and passing„ through.l the..termini ,therec f . The above--descried strip of land :contains an area of t, ;'''£ 0. 06 of an acre, more: or less. „ • . Iw .. , ..�, ,•.;�,.... -.-,..i�:.. . ...,1; , Mi t, ci , A, IA, e 1 •. ♦ . i ! A , 1 f , , . . .• . ,,,Vim)1.t., L.'�. 4,»1♦ . c , R. v.,yi. 1 , ,'d-.y, t'. • .,� •.. '"m py 4rt�....1-- h" .2•'?.„_'r 1l'''''+f,,'•A,f. "' 7 74+,w m4, r I p ----', wr,u+-. mw: r n FWr.cK U. ! t'-k QwI):...w....v Y +.wA..rl.�:'.'Ayrpww-a':.!.�nrA,lw4�4". (4) i. I - H r 1.4,-1o, & `, westerly line of 1a•tid dewscr.: bed in said deed as follows: North. 2° 14 ' 00" West: 260. 00 feet to a point, northerly on a 10 chord • . ' spiral curve to the left having a central angle o.'t: 3° 30 ' 00" ''' . (tangent to said spiral, at last mentioned point w, lash: described ' , r . A •,w A , ,. 1. k. it I course and c;mi d of said spiral bears North 3° 23' 59" West 23636 ,, .A0 feet) a spiral distance of 236 . 39 feet to ' a point, northerly on a .," • curve to the left having a radius of 1934 .913 Feet "and central angle of 4° 37 ' 0 . ltangent .to saidicurve , at . last 'm ntioned . , � ,, 1. . ,. . point bears North 5° 44 ' OO � West and chord of said curve bears Nortn 8° 02 ' 30" West 155. 87 feet) an arc distance of 155. 92 feet to the southerly line of Southwest' Bonita' Road '40 b,,.'et . wide) ; thence leaving last, said parallel *line ,and,;said cor - ;• r ' centric line and said westerly line oE land described in said deed East along said southerly line of Southwest Bonita �Roadj, . { 14 . z8 feet t to the point of beginning , contairiingl an��area of . 1 I I " • r + ' .. . . ., ..A., 4 1 r..„.•., , .. .. \. 1.29 acres, more or less. . • 1 .^ „ . TOGETIIER WITH an easement. for driveway purposes descrx.becx L.:, as fuilows: i3B INW:Ci�G at tho point of beginning of the above described a '1.X28 acre parcel of land; thence East along the southerly line .� of Southwest Bonita Road (40 feet wide) ; l5 .59 'fe'e 4 thence. .. South, 50. 0 feet to the easterly line of said 1. 28 acre ` . 4 of land; thence North 17" 19 ' 00" West along said c�aster•l.y line , 52 .37 feet to the point of beginning .containing " area 'of 4. 11 , : l,:. .:r, ;1 .. ., , ,l 0:). . 397 scluatct feet, more or less. I VING an eas,�:,ment for slope purposes Lit= l ��°. a YILS�, � along a 5trip of land 15. 0 " feet in" width lying.:contig"uous' to' a17d ,.... i • I ' , . .. 1 , .'. . .M . . ,,.t. , ,r ' 1:. .,, w � il . e. ' ,,, �„';' . , r EXHIBIT "A That certain parcel of land situate in the southwest • 4 `r ' '` ,quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 12 , Township 2 ' 4 ' ., r 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Base and "eridian, County of Washington, State of Oregon, being a portion of the land described in deed dated Jul ' 16 , 1907 , from George W. Cassaday et ux to ," • Beaverton and i iilsburg Railroad Company, recorded August 10 , ' 1907 , in Deed Book 77 , page 151 , 12ecortds of said County, des- r r.ibed as follows: , BEGIUNSt4G at a point that is distant North 89° 51 ' 44" West ',. ,. m 828. 85 feet from the northeast corner of said southwest quarter ',) of the °northeast quarter of Section 12 , said point being in a i Y,'. line parallel, with and distant southwesterly 50. 0 feet, measured at right angles, from the center line of Southern Pacific ' Transportation Company' s main track (Tillamook Branch) , at or near Engineer Station 310-1-40; thence South 17° 19 ' 00" Last along , said parallel line, 680. 95 feet to the southerly line of land described iri said deed, being the northerly line of Lot 21 of '.. '� `anno Creek Acre Tract as shown on the duly recorded plat thereof; ,, thence West along said southerly line , 171.21 feet to a point in lii westerly lire of land diescr,,.bed in said deed, last said pont being distant northeasterly 25 feet, measured at right angles, from the center line of Chicago; Durl:;_ngton & Quincy Railroad si Company main thick, at: Engineer SLation 699+28 ; thence northerly a1onc; a line arallel and coricentic with and, distant northeasterly IN 25 feet, measured at right angles vn0,4, radially, from said center line of said Railroad Company' s main trap,W, ?being said m. ) p.:M. •,,,. ._"., .u.,wlbkrtt4v to y....aM+,.+.r. a...W, ;'...w.. ... ww Y H.wa.rv.+m'F.e.r«y*mm. an. .... 411�..i..r„ y -- Y � e 4. '� e .� � • ,v,�irlr.l.lYn+l.'I�Mwrrrwpf�lfll ! `� . �• p � rte.. I A �; Oil ��+ i .a `��° ■a '/ i 4 ''r J,W Q"i5 H AVENUE, PORTLAND, OREGON .7204,, 1"1"'"'''.. awm 1,Z: c 4 TEL. 1*hi°Ji'J ($03) 2.26.2651 ► . E, MARQU LING, MANACA.a May 11, 1978 Mr, Dick Shook Technical Services Department 1 S. W. Columbia Portland, Oregon 9720 Dear Dick; 0 Based on your descripti rx of the hydrants protecting the property located south of S IT. Bonita ,Load near S. W. 74th between the Burlington Nor'che vn R.R. and .. the Sou fterr. r•�oific R.R., the applioable protection class would be Class 4. This assumes the actual hose lay distance to the building would be less than 530-Poet from either of, the° hydrants, both of which are situated across the , railroe i tracks. This applies solely to our rating and grading information and no other purpose is intended. Sincerely yours, INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE „,vvL 1 +l✓✓ )11.es 0 A. Schwager, Sut er.risor 4 Public Protection Department ..... ; JAS'ljh 1 a I a .. .. . i y r t ,� I ,Y, A° il t.4 , wn d `\. It ' 4.1 ° ww+» /(r I . )lq, , V ...».+�.. ., A41blu 1 .114. ,.u.'J`+ia ' x'I .A.rr'..+.•.':..... 't,:., ,r+,.,.w.. ., —..! x. ..Mr ,u .. Y ,.+r"W'tllx ..,.,, .., .. , , .... ,,,.,, .. .. • 1 d , I r �' . ! 1 .1 , :FEZ 1:41 D. so (..,.j....A.TVI IS S ec'ST,_...,' CO. or 0 re.gori , d `_, ,\ :1'' Insurance Brokers and crilltstii8Sinee 1858 ,,, ONE SOUTHWEST COLUMBIA. • P 9RTLAND 97201 (50", 148-6 00 Mr, Jim Schwager , Supervisor or lic Protection Dept. .. Xnaw'ance Services Offico of Oregon ' 421 L„ W. 6th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Dear Jim X am writing on behalf os our client who is contemplating construction of an all steel building in the Tualatin MD. The building when com- pleted will be occupied by two light hazard tenants with each tenant nt i / ocoti ing 50000 squire feet ro This building will be boated o n the south Bide c f g, W. tonita Road kJ between the Southern; n Paaci 'ic and the Burlington 4orthe railroad " tracks. There are standard fire hydrants within 50fl of the building, but the hydrants are located o n the opposite side of the railroad tracks from the building (see sketch blow) What will be the efkec t, if aoyion the fire insurance 4atin ` and protection grading of this , 0 building caused by the placement of those hydrant ThanIt you for your assistance in this matter, Very truly Yours, '!''' 0 I 6.k... zc 1 le.>0!‹..,,, , s. Disk Shook Tech. Services, Dept. .».., . a 1 Ni \Y k kJ • ii Mara THAN ail OF`ICES TO$Et t/. Y'oU IH'IR0U0HlOUT THE WUHRLU r :.. ,c msm rofiMrvxxs*++n+wsp...c.l..R. ""a W.NU+O y' .b it WASHINGTON COUNTY 4AY CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION AN ' , E MIT NO __! )4 ' R f\ Applicant \\„,)--.1�. . �� :`:,. \ "='Rti.�,�,., Signature ' � �' • Address b `s "�.�. ._ Contractor k �w."� ` ..._. :, r.City 1 ,. c•,'•a ,., 10, { ?C ( \\ Telephone Number f.., t-; () ., 2c 2, ,._. _.. , b�: Address of Construction 1`...)- ,; :,1 \'',.( •.y )1( .., ii�, 1,,, 1 ..,. , .1 t d' Subdivision Name .� . .~ )) Il C.(.244./( C ri'r,4./r..*.' re Cee u rr2 D T c ti ()CI C,_ C..• ' jey2- 0P 3 / /7'8 7' O iNN1c ,5(c.:-0 u i27'6,--S ( 5 iz--' F/ G- C p Z /2,, /, r ) Type of Driveway: Residential t ) Co'mtiercial C\,' ] No. of Driveway Openings * 1 ,' . Type of Construction: Concrete' [ 3 Asphalt t \ ] Gravel [ ] Width Ft, • Curb Cut Required: Yes [ 3 a C Sidewalk Cut Required: Yes i, ] No tw. ] . r ' At Culvert Size Determination: Y .s [e'� No [ j Size f Sight Distance: Approved [ ] Disapproved [ ] . , PERMIT Applicant is hereby granted permission to enter t:fight-of-way for the purpose of constructing a driveway at the above noted address. Applicant agrees Lo construct �` said driveway to Washington County Standard Specifications for Driveway Construction, p, NOTE: This permit shall become null and void 120 days from the date of issuance ■ and reapplication is required 94 ,4;/7„P. ,„P ..__ . . Apple^avt to call 648-.8738 for' insp_, ct:ior 24 hours print to pdurin,a concrete or ivilt , o n, ;” Permit; Fee $ , L-:..,.__._, Paid by Check 1 3 Cash [,,N1 Receipt Numb z' ,t..,A 9 _._....:.._ Bond Amount $ 4r'.0.,. i:: Cash 1, ] Surety [ j 7, ceipt N.aunbur 1) "F.....,c' '''C,1 t °t t". (r.ot`w,'-,,"t t,t Cis• ti l is,4 0, , �� r y e. ►' , WASHINGTON COUNTY' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS r2,vt ii y�.y.,-1.4 ;",. :��' � ,,,..s:9r... .. _..w i..........„...... V Title w+�..1 ,0,, 4 ,' ":�u ii. l , 1 1. :'R.evised 7/74 Date G ; "' ', . , f tl1- L.. w 4.w.`. + 1..ryl 1Y '1 uYYMVx .,i..n :. 4ir•r-- �'' .+. r. . - .. .Ai' _._— —,-. .... .., ...,,.•, si�tiinfxi2itiiiue]G.. .& -- .uw «S x Ja3h t igiiiu- f A e ttiiia �r lli, w" n SMl.14 2411 , W. ,1' •r ,k.,.. ,R. / y.r1,..+••.*,: -'x.'J11. *I'1',+::"•'�' a • �■ ^`„v v..?rr!. I:( T -.I V'..'R' 1,• �. "J.--1,..,.,.,,:. �'� '� ;'; ,i£�'��uC.'c'..i1, "w.�.1/ 'rl,:' .,�T%+.'e6' 'b•�r'''-1y1 I •o ,. 1- -14 `It Y �V,II ty N. >; h 1`x „,,,,,:or {1 ', „,.∎";' T h.r'i+'L4' (�rM w.r w rr.r��sy�g}1 g•1Jf? `•�'`f 1 v tr w ,r,',..,` �.y u�+�.;hJ hfi'y�lT:�' "1"1 i'� '.fit t}kJ',"�y. j4 '�� fi�r'�"1�`y+(�) r,7+1a P4.gj ?!��},f11.1 '�,{y1A,;y 'jrF� .G,1� 1�7i. j !` .M.1 I��rt11 ryryi,,,��,,,,�p” AAw)i�((if��, �r+,fit,p '� l�ld'4'iwt R� •-r1 V; �;��'���w�„N�R �7" '; , ,1r r�. I � Y4, ;!.,•1 .�j�••'�.'r• i r'r/'.. h 4,\ � 1. :•+ "` '.h>. „ f -,,v:' 1 9','�'., t - .. • 'e,;;')",$14,'?.� i1 £ .Nr, N` V9'• 1.. V,f ' ';1�"1„'a"T'.�"•1 �+9 0"Y 1•. ° �..41 •q.��g[�ss;,,yW•y. ¢ 1' � ..w',�.�.a1• ,��'tr• �•; r ,,;f" r t"-h t �1+ .+� 'iil�f'.h71�1'C�n� 7 ,� '"?j".';', . ti F d` . ' t 1 e �s j 1•,��'..,, I ♦;, 1, �` .1 •,f�"9 f '•7 "''''..r1' -G tl-N !1" q y�,.1' �• '"�1 d'�.n, 11 €a + ,w �„' �q 1 • its.;", "+9. �'r,�r• 11,• r r f ,�.A4 a r � .'tn�'r^+. (t °"�1��p9'1 �7� � �. � ,.w, , t :.: A•A f' �1, 1 PIrT4 -�",,"''''.1. , � xl`" '.�t}i'".1;��� �,'� 1` . 1 t �'1 �1 tix�y Q�y ���yc�L� \,a 94�,r ii cy rF' �1:}"JL �' y ll $a',Y ( r t i r trr q'�* "„gyp„" s 4 S'+ V 1 1 V,f`,w �' �±�' -,ny � •• '•,.2' rA 4„,,I)T,er}a 1. `� a. '•,"�A "Mr 1�' , �w, r l 4y'JC �1 '.�NI•i "p',- yf 1„= 'n r. rl-I2 ., f 1 i �• , •a,:i�' ,l( h"1 Y,. 4/Ir}+Js �.+ ,,,, +, _ ,ti �,�•r.. "(i �rc” �f��• �y � ♦WMw�(,�'�J 4..' y.•."i.iy... '..f•.' ',4•.LM >- ..r�,�.J',.�Yr...+JG%^.,+.1,7, F - . , n ,.7 CCYY -� yygq . , ' 'r h ` x+ ...ryy+�:rrwla�a•►n1.1a'OeUn^m lY� '.,. .. .-r-.—`,...-:L � r, .,... .-..". '',"..r—:-.,,, ""w.'a+a•MrVUb ,v►'e*P.w+4�lou�ABr ........•�•.......4./W f L i/��nI.1 ' y '�'1.. d �+�.. ....„ .-.�,...1.� h rt V +.....u,..4•.*Zu . �1 w � w..+w..a.vrr.�+...uw w.n+w•wr..w...r.......y 1 1F":r ' s Itif a � r� r =u k '''e ---4::,4,',',,,,i �ti '..4..,i . �' a � + .,r-1,�4 " �,, n a --,c-*41',., :,..'- :'.'' '' 1-:--' 20' „ r� }� A'�±. ,•I!''r- 1 2J RADIUS �'.r r;• 2O RADIUS -Jo�ti! r 1 ' ; n 1 II, 1 VARIABLE. 1 .,7 ',,,a,....,�....,�. M 911 � � a `QyWyq` • SUGGESTED MINIMUM DRIVEWAY SIGHT DISTANCE FOR TWO LANE ROAD ' l' f SPEED DISTANCE SPEED DISTANCE 35 f .P.�' . .• f0.,250 F"i I L ^ i NOTE: IF AC, DRIVEWAY IS TO BE ►� �, j " " INSTALLED, USE OF CLASS a . '� MIX ON APPROVED BASE. /-- ELEV. SAME AS c., CROWN ELEV, l TLOPE I/4":`'. �' I ROAD SURFACE BOTTOM DtTCH , ' ELEV. COULlu BE ADJUSTED BY INSPECTOR D c... 1.,..I 04 0 P = k 1 ''"-,V1' MIN. —St4rE TO BE, DETERMINED BY INSPECTOR AT T-IE SITE ,i *PIPE SHALL EXTEND A IMMIN, I`4' PAST TOE of FILL w SI'1PrACE Or DRIVEWAY'' t" ''' MIN, DEPTH I ✓ � ,� ' 1,„ , �A ,... /!�r ICI I N U S ,ROCK y,�' '" ,1/ �t Armor. two.... 44;;P t"r wJ aZtn2Z Mini=,��'!.," ioroi .0;4=1'' 1 'F' ,t.,x. ' ,ry sate w 1 PO d' .. "'PIPE TO DE LA?Eb AT EXISTING GRADE OE DITCH- NO SLUM$5,§`,, �fi. ., ? �.. .iIM1I P JP?t440 r rM' t'7 ,. r i ` ,►iR,/` '41 rrr is ......, ,k (.: .BL .I 1. Nt I t 4,ir Dili" I n iN I11':,.v, �,..;. Il1 y—tzj, `0'1 l;( 1Ut `:--t :,►Vt� .it- rs"z. t �:4,11d - .q I lilt` IIIIIAI '„ 7 I �i► 111111,4 i!Igg.`�z �c 2411II 71.",1!101"-lI I' -- IA 'x1.41 but 1 I1 ;tiell11r.gr1tI, Srf, 1w q . -a,a.+.,••rv. ,,nn r rww. 'bltoewe34;uu,rlre'rar, m1'170",'•-. Y'.is ,:. eN,:l .�,,�.,:an. .�5� .r, �� .A1 "�n�- MI.?'.�'Cdi, I c �,'�' ' n.roh'.-. .,i.11,1",.fy,,d .ram ••■ ,,,h I r� rwnr rr;: ' LASHINGTON„ +�„jpUN 'Y DEPT Cif, PI. BI."" vv(",- i ', h+i.�� ....4w:.arw.uM. +iwr. �pwewrr.riw:Ni" ..•,w..aiiM.,,ww(�. - .� '.. -- �� �ai..a....u..#G w', 1iAl r ..�;; .-4�a ' _ R E V I jS,C D DRIVEWAY JMt , ,� 4�1"�( V „if„ .:..1+i.+•...'w.. W...JY.. r,•�',r:∎.. `' .., '{,4 ' R U R A L :..'�'`�j1 '�T+' gg `1 ' .-..w ... wr"' 1 11 ai q1��e rA V . .. �' rt ,.-' ,. ...,.,, �;,..'�. 141tUrmldA•..,. �. .. .,�.., �+ ..... nl. r r ' NRtrQY"1""&"4, } �I fl, RJ1G h p4 il��j I�440 � +'w 4 w� N q1"�'�41M!RaMKfuY}' Nw:'h+rrW,pyp,�,�,ny�, r r ,•.,i d:r S.1'4•o p i�'`>""yu'F'�"W+.*,war,HW.i4tlM.r�rwyhmir�,hrwliu.0 "• f' sW��, LABOR & INDUSTRIES BUILDING, SALEM 97310 P�HO N - (503) 378- 6 6 6 0 q d'vtry•M.M March 2, 1978 0, Mr. John R. Skourtes ,�4 Route 1, Box 575G�R� Beaverton, OR 97005 till 0 itPlease refer to your letter received March 1, 1978, concerning your desire to construct a driveway entrance to property located between the grade crossings at Bonita Road of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and Burlington Northern, Inc. PT3C staff has no objection to the construction of said driveway p r o v i d e d a "tg:L_J e f t : ..s.: .n a.ss .n t „ ,e on the south approach to Bonita Road. It is our ti"i "Fr i §` , at s d sa:g iTt be installed before any vehicular traffic makes use of said new roadway. Should the nature of 'the. ,,,,,a.�a�.il.l :aa t ,., g ,...i.r�.�.. # '" \, the. t*`a,; tze. tnt Pub .io �7ti�.ity ,..Cornmi.ss.Z.oner has the f right and obligation to insure the safety of the motoring public using said driveway. tt '9 Roger P. Campbell Administrator Rail Rate and service Division ra/0694 I r ‘04,3 -,, . .-., foot , s , 0-/,::: ' ' : ' ) a ORS 78(34040(1)The commissioner,, r "'shall represent the customers c any pu611e utility, railroad,Asir barrier or motor carrier, and, '" shall make use of tho jurisdiction and pow or of his office to protect such n.rstomers,and the publics generally,from unjust and unreeso adequate it &nd reasonable rates," t, ,O, e aetions and practices and tootst �n for them service at to t I ,. rKti+wr4..r 1.AlAy..` .M&.'•'MF+1 HWlnau.r•fjAwy rcu.y :µnor-r.N ..,.w ` N , µM1•.• n rsK �tii , .u.r..w..'�......1. .....—n —..... J �L j ..Y.. ... , , p • . 1, . .. , .... . .... 1 '1:yt+�'�•41 .�.JIIIL'y .1.YMM'�h • i,, PTATIO 1AL SAFETY COMPANY ( )24-- �,' , ' ". Route 1, Box 575H w ' • P-Beaverton, Oregon 97005 r , r,' �r " f � '7, I, i, Y arc • it..,■:////. .. ,.. „ • ' May 24, 1978 ::. 0 eU 1i I TO: Mr. Ed Walden, building official and acting City Manager when site i' `k�._. in question was reviewed by you la't December-1978 SUBJECT: Issue bt,a .ldin.g permit for 10,200 sq. ft wakehouse, tax lot 4000 . ' . N . • • We hereby ask you to review the building plans for National Safety Co. as submitted to the city on March 1,) 1978 and issue a building permit for ' ' construction of 10,,200 sq. ft. warehouse on tax lot 4000 • '. , Tithe is of the essence. We would expect this to occur upon payment of the • following fees: . . • - • ,� U©.00 Sewer " . 500.00 Facility charge 400.50 Plan the & building fee - • : •, Playas have already been approved by the State Depart then t of Commerce. • . If you will carefully review our letter to fir. Bolen, planning director dated Say 16, 1978, together witty: the taped meeting of May 9, 1978, where you were , present together with Messrs. Skourtes and Barker, you will note that there are no a.i eas of substance wherein planning can prevent applicant from bui1dju r structure on this site. All canclusionery points in planning staff retort signed by tar. Bolen,, dated, April 27, 1978 have been proved wrong or favorably resolved. Therefore, we have been advised by our attorney that the City of Tigards position,, specifically ' Mr Bolen°s on minor land petitioning is legally untenable. . e.„, . ; We will agree to go 'thru landscape review .ln conjunction with you issuing a ' t' building permit. , Further delay in this meaner serves no useful purpose to all parties roncereti4. Continued h±nde=ranges will only cause further economic hardship to applicant ) 1 and negative feelings for all parties. . • If further ciarifice t Ot' is required on any point, p1.eaee call our counsel • direct) Moro ���re,1 Anderson, phone Igo. 639-11.21. . Sincerely, , NATIONAL SAFETY CO.. INC. by p 1 III cc. Mayor ,:► i° .i,; hie! '.e.)p ; i i r � RECEIVED Nationel Sof ty Ccrapeny, Inc. MAY 16 1878 Rt. 1, boh: 575 H Beaverton, Oregon r'OOb CITY OF TIGARD May 16, 1976 Mr. Richard Bolen Planning Director "j cy of Tigard 12420 S.W. Mein 1 Tigard, Oregon 9722' S .sject : Reply to staff report MLP 5-78 - Tentative Tex Lot 4000 ' Requst: 7.efleive permission from your department to construct 1O,2O,' sq.ft,. St.ran Steel warehouse structure at this site end move the proses, on to site review Arad building permit. D,.Bar M•::. Bolen: Beceuse of the eleven week delay, the ML,F issue Is mute. However, fc ° .�:,,^ 1:,. cord we went to stete the following: Parcel in quest4on was rlefacto petitioned L elve yer r9 ego, 1966, when S°P,R°fit. loused thin site to be used by William M. Mears, used ecruipment dealer , bYEore Tigard 1-i d, a MPL ordinance which was not recoreded and in cf f'cct until lest 1 December 1977. CRS 92.010 para gr.aph 8 States; (st to statlA to which is the, basis of Ti.gf rr1's MPL r,�rdi Hance) , - "Partition land does not incriude any edjustment of e lnt line by the reloeetio:) ", common hourv'„ .t9'y wk,en 'n p6:11r'el is°no.`. 'tl tt The +bo''iu ORS states whet constituteq po rt:iti.on 1-1nd. No effective re e:L h 1-v=ir been offered by the p7 anninc deportment report to counter the above. Tlh ,:rfa f'o_re it remains our position that MLP i s not r oquia ed for this parcel. I L t Size P1enn±ni deportment report is using ser .a CY 111./18.030 T (2) 50 f i r't minimum lot width to ✓ .ay that lot i.cl not up to code ,5tenc3:�a l ds. This ;�a on in- accurate 7 ntc^r rrt:tj cn. This s e c-tirn applies t � r erte lau1 N z lots , not tr a. . encie shaped lots. This lot is over one Here in s i,.>.? and possem,e F nwture-s1, boundar.�aes° Width :between two railroad tracks et Bonito Road i � 90 !eei` . Furthermore 1. if r 17.000 Lot sive e.:c„ ption:9 rerele4 ;i,f on August 24, 197n T:? lot hos an 9:.-eo or dimension which does not meat the lot size verfu4reltents in on on h3. e property is l t� , lot �tt” �� Lam, ,, the zone -, which �"h °�' oc�r3 �rl ��'^' r " ,' .'� ?��; l + t:.r. ord. 7I '^3q J Ap7.°11 1977 rF''oP. s mi.3,'t,J►T1Hr• l.; rt':tth of mn? ..cl Jc; 400' minimum turning r,,dt ,./ 90 t'�., +• 3 'I'.w .040 mintUrtrLartl, rl uht of 'Way 20 feet. . r . minimum 16 64 030 Industrial use c c;ce,:a -eurr , T i Tth 3n C.rt All of the above points c en be used os arguments to counter the 60 foot inter- , ," retetion of pl nni,nci stvrf. Pew- 1 ° ° 1 r t 0 , e, " Mr. Richard Bolen May 16, I97A Page 2 Feot: Anyway, the nsrrowest point where improvements sbail begin on oaeded propercy is 74fetwi3c Area to the north of boidling site will 'oe used for parking end driveway access and egress to Bonito Road. Applicant his reoorded deeded and easement ..r.iuhs of 30 foot road frontage end 'ease rights from S.P.P.R, en edditional 10 feet. S.P. wouldwIt sell us parcel for development without assisting us in the do- velopment of this parcel, S.P. he and will continue to cooperate with us in a positive way. The two authoritives that bevo jurisdiction over the ,,ccess and egress t(.., the site (state P.U.C. and Washington County Department of Roads) hove both apyroved this site. We have received driveway Termit #8048 from the county per pJans submitted to the county. Of course drivew:i is doing to be reworked. When access driveway complete( - me%imum height differential 24 illches. There will be no blind spots. Turning rodius end driveway has been designed by or engineer. Pvrthermore, legal speed limit for trcffic trnveling on Borits Rood it this locntion is SO mph be- cause of railroad crossings. Premature statements in y - department's memo from certain city personnel have no weight wherein jurise n over the site :tests with others. • Building official memo al police report wc..s premature. Neither of these per- sons were furniehod complete root,30 tbsr, r(-,rr, their responses ere dated. Water and fire protection is available for this site,. Neither of these servires are undet city of Tigard jurisdiotion. Any ststements In the report concerning this area not applicable. Concl4sion : Upon reviewing the points mentioned above there is no basis f yoi to hold ur, this project any longer and conttnue to cu ,,(-onomio loss to thT svpIicant. You have the edmin5.st/otive authority to si..pruv: this proje,s.'t (,11-.1inLnee 77-no) now We ask for your favorable response. Sinceroly, çL /N4 John R. :lkourt President P.S. All of us (investors, engineer, loan committee, bsnkor, Insurrinco Ratinj Services of Oregon, S.P.R.R.) are aware that this site co4 not r, 21.: developed. That is why we c..1c only rvtLino up tJ lo, un ifc evr though the site has 55,000 sq.ft. of deeded land. If you have any .-uc'stions pieces phone -649...4.:,e32. °Sated pauilaaaulaip t:Rg'1ou 31 a`gtwt{paad Jt+pt•ot'Itir ja aalCoiduto ua,41, '. ,t[1;r%ms ualn.i pltkrt�a rutinu'3{a :}s{margtu:Pa uly.+"l�atJp sit' Poe Jo.a:t''aratlio prx[aolitnu ua,+g I+rtnrrxa ng pinuya'r6er' ,K t:dtnrao paanaadadnul ti.II..i3/9 ,t. ci"7`^, K+++�t•Y�J«N:brnu=7;7nw,.>•r. ... .,.w..,....wM,...w�c+.wMw..w,,..,.•.w....w..,f•W.�.,.'..,........r...awP, ...,;�.,.�,.. M.+i„w.- ,.W a+,•Mw i,, t•,(m t ,,g4, o lil !ter a+' » iu ;:s. . :t+u: s:.ssdu>.v'kra..^a.:.t.mu...avdr`xaa,' ,Srait.t.p#fi 01-'0' ',','' ,:„;' clt,'.i:VI , - ,, (1, ,,I, ., , ' F : .,.. . . .`' R abv, 1 � I p { t' i , l!A , 1- ' 1 x. ,f , :.,,,'..6,,,,, 11 1 . . '!4, 1 - }iv ,{+ y i k �N1 1• JA,?.e.,:� t•y�d 4 {/ ,4 , M Xal r 7� �+, `4'' P r .,-.d.', ( i }rl t^,:k:2:a9,'cl:.kik't.,yZ' , J , '4 r'., '� . w a Y' 1 ,..., 't ' lke, Snt+,�.. tw wv, t• Pf Ir d tli ^!jy{ 'P ' . . `, 7�„ �'' d' 1 9 •,�..+ 441}{?v') ',',' . is 1 ° 1 - 1 ,' 1n'q�y ��yyi g M1t).,�411;'tM .,"S 4.),",a' i t— ..�,..4 ' r s k C .,ak»a , t t 4FYk r'rr • •n 'Jr 41.,E {rO'>L 41 , t ` .”Q.:,:;,ifr«ki«GYr�kstY`,7:.:�1%�St;�'.�5 A�`� i 7 b, std i� o , i y , • 11-.; ,ii. ' ',' , . ' I,I I, L i q !,�. !, 3a,wAw,trm. w..Y. ««.y�»1b.F.�„wr...s.,.-A... g tk'° del 4 ,� � • • b } �� r t rd}. f' Mw j a y 1. '' a” ..'v,1 -R,�. . � ., 'clo. 1r w r r'h', Sr t, •. �W>, �w �r;Jr rt ,,,,,,,,i ii,, ' 74N �, fif? " t ', f Y �k .;ro n� , , ,, , , }) ( r'ji."''i ',flµ/ ,i' C {j„,,, t.it k a y .4 1` R, L X i .''.':,i1 Y •3 } 'na G. M [ 1 ii ' '+ Y 1 i,, 1 , ' lyr ,'Ir'f''� 4 �,, 1 ''i'I N I l' ,t . � t•, I i I1 1',, ''” '` Yi i '' I,;' ,. L'!'. rP[ lr I i I' 9. f Jn• dY t v7,411'.':., ypa `, 1 ,i� .' ..dt/,,t.4-.,�Y' ,.»t-•`I1.,1,4t',: .t.,,:J.e.g.»'.,r'z c......q«,r nxo•— ' a t'm4r".t:.'.exkast,vat aa.:er. :ea», t it 7 �M�ki*°r'"'u".z�uu'»�=�,::kt�.'::"..�.""�1�•'s.N.,ii 'aux'tY u..,rA i'• M., .,.. ....�... «a .t ,wilt lS'k xu:,zlu4aLtyt4t,Qtl ,{)SY.4d"Il'ykr taat;t,n wnawut� , . a xw x u w -awrwiw �wwHawr»�.0»ate RV 'k�'�p.'tt a, ,.;,,,t Ali{ fir.• • .'Cpl ', \- Yn p 1, y, 4 National Company, Inc. . ^ Route 1, Box 575 H I Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Vey 10, 1978 Messrs. Bolen , Laws, Altman 'bard P3 anning Department 12420 S.W. Main St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Cenviem.en e Follow up to our letter of May 7, 1978 requesting a hearing ✓ before either the planning commission or city council. reference: construction of 10,200 sq. ft. Stren Steel weY:e.. ,: house building tentative tax lot 4,050. We are reedy to rew nt .,)ur position n this mat•t:eD to either of the above citizen'1 s ,,coups upon receiving a five day not ice t from your of.Eice, This means that we are ready to procede at on:te when the next ^ .. cance:!leticn occurs. si• Your pros,".ptivwss in fitting us Into the schedule 1,,. a PP e oiated • Sincerely, .7oh i. Skourtes 1/ President •tilAY 1 5 191E3 C' 1 6111/ Of filt.iARD • ,.. .,,. a ':, „:, ,.- .,._:.:.,'. .,,.,.,.,.:...,. �,.., »... �war,r^*w..r •.wry,..+w+x�,,, i . fl:. 4 Pi,'\'''''''' ., . 1 ■ p. Ili)y 7, / ,97? . .„ to ‘, ci tc,r," 4 c 7'riArt/) P 41/a,m rf&,. . I .,:: C x 7y 0/2 7!6/ /2.0 REC I°f 5 I ril-P 1, N L ,S-7� . t ,�`� \ `fly J kC 4 j41 0 ^r (+ ?:770/1(f , ,� r�/6 C� Oil' ✓// y r Vr�9��` J� M r I y'��K.+,f... ��2�',�4.df .h�� ����i•. \��,�f 1 d��f� +'�Y � � ^!r/(1"" ���f✓l�Y ~. tt\l . v�r'ar{t? /�PPA c.l4/b`' /7 /, ' /VOL/ . co 4,to �.cf, ci_i 01✓ !/ kV4/1/,U C c✓ ..7 'r-o R. 4 y CAf(c C.47/bi"J it/AV N/I7 a C(4'/ . S 0 4-f .T.) -/AL 6. .4 ;r-. it /"M// t , k1 6 A r4 4 loo/2(S7/4''G Oce,,!'-.5,,a'eigr� J/1& -44,d t',/ o//ii71 /yo Le. , ,��. ,� / / i 0(fit C 0 r't c Y/ CoN cel, q, 7,/1 Jt✓ 4,1-0 0 ,— /0/r/20';' 74147 -`re' G , j 1, 6kk` it'F'C 4 7L//r4�` p 0/h'V till,/ 06, AC',1'Q t wt't,) 1 1 Ci:7,' -t 'tv C' (0 v /'' .4'--o 741 "z/' 14 cam' I rAr on Po P/i1 c" ,66W;e,itr4%G 64.1r 14 S/iv C _:'i/ht ( n• } 14.4k PotiTioc4ri,I '. ,- ;_....,....,.,�..,..,,.,..—��,��,.,., _,»,a ,..::,.,, ,... ;..mow. „�:.. :. ,..��...:.n,,..:�u:,: .,. s ,.. • ----•µ—* .� , . ..... „ „ ..... k .. 11. 00 id -., • ci " ,-----.. (' , c' 4) Ck,' Iii, 4 _otioliN ,A$'---' 31/4 ,/,'. a m i F 1 in 1 1,vo WASHINGTON COUNTY .,.... 1 7A AM 1■41L ,,4 ,r)/ •0_' , . , AM gm m / .•. , ,s. will!,./ ADMINISTRATION BUILDINO.—15C N. FIRS AVENUE <,, ,- 'o '0 . ` \''■.?......° -%--"/ HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS April 28, 1978 D §E% .OF PUBLIC WORKS MILLER M.DURIS,Chairman JOHN F.CPOCKETT,Director BILL BLOOM ROOM 204 ,- VIRGINIA DAGG (503)648.8886 .X RICHARD C.HEISLER , — RAY MILLER • /j 4 , John Laws 0 John City of Tigard Planning Department _ 12420 S.W. Main „ P.O. Box 23557 ,. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Bonita Road D.,;Ivelopment Dear John: . • . . In response to your grequest f,Dr comments on a proposed ds,,velopment on tax ... . , lot 4000, Nap 2S1 12A, on the south side of Bonita Roar '-etween the Oregon Electric ' - and the Sout%eln Pacific railroad ';.;racks, oar commantc.., ,Are as fol:I.ows: 1 . 1, Bonita Road is designated as a major collector facility on Washington • \.,„ County's Interim Transportation Plan and as such we would request dedication of . 4 right-of-way 35 .-eet from centerline of Bonita Road. 1 ,. 2. The question of location of access to the propert'y has seveYal possible answers. The most preferable acce from Washington County'e point of view would be south across the flood plain to an existing public right-of-way leading south from this property. Second most deSirable access would be with a private crossing of the Oregon Electric railroad tracks to 74th Avenue. A third possibility would be with a private crossing of the Southern Pacific tracks and privahe property to an access to Bonita Road at the same location as an existing access about 350 feet east of the Southern Pacific tracks. 3. The least desirable acces,s„Agint„is, directaypo Bonita Road between the two sets of r ailitrt.Tainrin;Mariabi"VAST.TE-access T arertAtitithsance r'a.17o7artainrfiraTISTVar questionable depending on where the access is iocafed. The acdeSs must be wide enough to allow long trucks to egress from the site without crossing the centerline of Bonita Road, thereby possibly creating a hazard to vehicles approaching. It appears from profiles of Bonita Road measured by Washinln County staff that the sight distance situation is caused. by the peal,_ in the road et the Southern Pacific tracks, but sufficient information is not avaAabl e.4. at this 1 time to fully say there will or will not be a hazard. It would appe ./ that if an access is held about 20 feet from the Southern Pacific tracks and a driveway fill brought to the elevation of the road at that point, vehicles °greasing from the site , would be able to see over the Southern Pacific track toward vehicles oncoming from the east. Vehicles waiting in Bonita Road to turn left into the site wIpuld be visable over the crest of the hill at the tracks at that point. 4. The vertical alignment of Bohita Road is obviously substandard in the area of the two railroad. crossings. At some time in the future, Bonita Road will as ., ,,4, a probably be constructed to major collector standards, though there is no projected date for this to happen. At that time one of the cons5ierations will be raising the Oregon Electric tracks or lowering the Southern Pacific tracks such that both railroads are at about the same elevation so the road can be built over the tracks and meet road design standards. The driveway constructed in the proposed development should he designed so that it will not only meet th3, existing gra je of Bonita Road in the manner described earlier, but will be able to meet the grove. of Bonita atter it is either raised to the elevation of the Southern pacific tracks or lowered to the elevation of the Oregon Electric tracks. This will il1fi^�lve some careful engineering on the part of the developer. 5. Prior to any construction on the site, the developer's plans for access to Bonita Road,should that access be proposed,should be carefully reviewed by City of Tigard and Wa,9hington County staffs to see that these concerns as well as those of the City's aye satisfied. Furthermore, the construction should be inspected, to see that it is done according to the plans approved by the City and the '!ounty. Should you have further questions on this or should further information become available as t:o the developer's specific plans, please contact me and we will further discuss th:'"s„ Very truly yours, J e 'ome J. Morse, P,E. Chief,. Engineering Services JJM:j�a P 7 1 %11 Page 2 John taws, City of Tigard April 25, 197 ‘ , ii- I � y v rage"' ,„„ . aoavivrArow rir,virt o CTY orIGAFOy P.r. Box 23397 o ),242( S.W. Main, Tigard, Oregon 97223 April 28, . 1978 National Safety Company Route 1, Box 575H IP Beaverton, Oregon 97005 A.•.<:ention John Skourtes RE : MLP 5-78 ' Dear Mr. Skourtes Please be adviser tha': on April 27, 1978, your application to create out of a portion o:e the Southern Pacific right- .' ..„ of-way a 1,128 acro parcel in a M-3 'Light Industrial" zone, (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S 112A, Tax Lot 4000) was disapp rovod ;, by the City of Tigard Planning Director. This disapproval is subject to the conditions stated in the attached staff report . Because wo anticipate that you will wish to appeal my decision regarding your Minor Land Partitioning request, a ti r, place hE sbeen reserved on the July 25 y 1978 Planning Commission agei7.da. In order to officially lodge an appeal , `' we wil. need a request in writing (there is no appeal ;teu) . .., As you are aware from the staff report, Planning Commission action is also necessitated by the request of the Building Of f icial . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the City Planning Department at 639--=4171. . Sincerely, w. . /9 (It/'--- Ben Altman . Assistant Planner ' BA/do NOTE: The followi.ag acknowledgment must be received key'the ) , City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt ' of this letter. Failure to return this acknowl';dgment may result in .art~,on by the City of Tigard, I hereby aecnowledge thix letter documenting the action of the .. Tigard Planning Commission, I have received and read this /` letter, ,, Signature . Date - . Jet; .....--ill .rnw ---- .. ar ,.:rao-rnwn++grTw 1.----77,7.77.----1— .\' N' :', , , 4- ' 1 ,, ( ,, ,,, 4 mauve) PINY 8 1978 co Of TIGARD April 280 1:.,78 4 'Irrational Safety Cotnpany Route 1, 30C;i3 575H beav9rton, Oregon 97005 Attention: John Skourtes RE! ML? 5-78 1 Dear Mr. Skourtes: Pleae be advised that on April 27, 1978, your application to create out of a portion of the Southern Pacific right- of....way a 1.28 acre parcel in a M-3 "Light Industrial" zone, (Wash. Co. Tax kap 2S 112A, Tax Lot 4000) was disapprovu by the City of Tigard Planning Director. This dispproval II/1 is subject to the conditions stated in the attached staff report , , Bocause we anticipate that you will wish to appeal my decision regarding your Minor Land Paltitioning request, a place has been reserved on the July 25, 1970 Planning Commission agenda. In order to officially lodge ;Pm appeal, we wil/ need a request in writing (there is no appeal fee) . As you 'are aware from the staff report, Planning Commission aetion is also necessitated by the request of the Duilding Official. If you have any questionso please dc„ not hesitate to contact , the City Plartning Department at 639-41/1i, .. Sincerely, Ben Altman • Assistant Planner 8A/db NOTE: The following acknowledgment must be received by the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this lettere, Failure to return this acknoKedgment , may result in action by the City of Tigard. I hereby acknowledge this latter documenting the action of the Tad Planning Commission, I have received and read this , letter. . , 8ignature Date • " fain,' r 14 , ip . te`;. STAFF REPORT ' - FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION. . April 27, 1978 Tigard City Hall 12420 S .W. Main St . - Tigard, Oregon Docket : Minor Land Partition MIP 5-78 , Request : To create out of a portion of the Southern Pacific right-of--way a 1 .28 acre parcel in a M-3 "Light Industrial" zone. mil III Location : Southwest Bonita Rd. eastsideof SW 74th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12A; Tax Lot 4000) . Applicant : National Safety 'Company I Basic Facts : 1 . The applicant is requesting permission in accordance with Section 17:24 .030 of the Tigard Municipal Code, to create out of a portion of the Southern Pacific right-of-way a 1 .28 acre parcel in a M-3, Light Industrial zone at SW Bonita Rd. , eastside of SW 74th Avenue. 2 . The site is a triangular shaped lot bordered on two sides (east and west) by railroad lines. The property is several feet below the grade of SW U Bonita Rd w' ch i-'orders the parcel to the nth. The southern portion of the sit 1i. s within the 100 year flood plain. Surr.ound gig,' land use is industrial and residential proper ties. `. 3. In the M-3 zone the following lot requirements are app li;able : 6 ,000 square foot minimum lot size (Section 18 .48 .03'0 (1) ) -- 60 foot minimum lot width (Section l8 .48.030(2) ' = Sys ;backs shall be 30 feet front, 20 feet side yard, 20 feet rear yard (Section 18.48.040(1 ,2,3) ,.; No setbacks required when side or rear properties lines abut a railroad rigi.%-of- way (Section 18.48.040 . (4) ) ! 4 . According to the applicant 's submitted site plan, the lot width along the north property line (Bonita Rd. ) is approximately feet . As stated in finding #3 above, the minimum; lot width in a M-3 zone shall be a minimum of 60 feot . II .., 5 ► On March 6, 1978, the City received a notification letter from the Washington County Department of «wary+ ,..ym. wo.,.,...rN•r..+m ,r.,, "e STA�C'F REPORT: - �4:d:NAL ACTION � ,; . TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 27, 1978 . .gage 2 . n . Assessment and Taxation 'that a portion of the Southern Pacoific Railroad right-of-way has been . acquired by National Safety Co, resulting in the + creation of a new, lot (Tax Lot 4000) . . The applicant had not filed with the City at that time an application for a minor land partition. , pursuant to Oregon Revised Statute 311.280(1) , the County cannot "divide the assessment" unless evidence has been filed with the county that the e City has approved the division of land, the division should not be recorded on the tax map but was erroringly done so by the County office of m Assessmen and Taxation . 6 . The applicant has stated in his letter of submission (dated March 3, 1973) that a "30 foot road access is available to serve the property, Based on the site plan as submitted, two 15 foot Ji ,, wide access points parallel to each other are shown. Since the property is only appro imately , 15 feet wide along the Bonita Rd., frontage, staff y" is left to assume that the remaining 15 feet is to be provided on the Southern Py.cific railroad right-of-way. No indication of aa' easement or an agreement by the railroad to permit access across their property has been submitted with the application,. 7. The Tigard Building Official has reviewed the proposed; partitioning (see attached memo) and based cn the proposed access and egress has observed that the proposed vehicular access is "extremely hazardous, especially for larger trucks and semi-trailer rigs" and has recommended no business traffic be allowed in and out of the property„ Section l8, 64.020(6) of the Tigard Municipal Code states: Applications for building permits shall be referred to the Planning Commission for review when in bhe . opinion of the building official, the access proposed would cause such hazardous traffic conditions to v e such exist. o r would proved h inadequatF access :r:or emergency vehicles or would in any other way cause such I, 4zardous conditions to exist as to constitute a clear and present daanger to the pub7.is health, safety and general welfare. �,.,,,; ww,...rw ,. -- M......m.na+.dw,.onem..m"c►�r'na'"',"r"n _ , 410• / STAFF REPORT - 9kNAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 27, 1978 Page 3 • 8. A memorandum from the Tigard Police Department (see attached) to the Planning Department recommends that the subject parcel "not be used" to accommodate • any type of business, a entry and exit would be very hazardous. " 9 . The Tualatin Rural Fire P:..otection District has also reviewed (see attached letter) the proposed partitioning and has made the following oomments: The access to the building would have to be a minimum of 20 feet wide. " "The turn onto the access way from Bonita would have to meet the guidelines as required for emergency access for department vehicles. " "The present driveway has two sharp bends that would be difficult for fire apparatus to negotiate. " 10. Staff has spoken with the Washington County Public • Works Department concerning issuance of street opening permits. Since SW Bonita Rd. is a county road, the county has jurisdiction . It is the county's opinion that accessing between the two railroads would result in an undesirable situation . However, this preliminary analysis suggests that it may be possible "but expensive" to provide an engineered plan that would result in a safe access egress . 11 . The Public Utility Commissioner has stated that they have no objection to a driveway into this property and between the railroad tracks if a no 'left turn sign is installed at the entrace. However, this remedy is not fool proof because the Police have no authority to enforce such a stipulation on privateproperty. Thereforepeople could ignore the sign with the City Police or County Sherfiff haYing no legal enforcement capability. • II . Concitisionary Findings ) ; 1 . The proposed 15 foot 'wide frontage along the north p.copzirty line (S .W . Bonita Road) does not Meet the MiAIMUM lot width of 6J feet and is therefore in • violation of the zoning code standards. 2. The Tigard Water District has stated that vater cannot be obtained by connecting into either the 6 inch or 12 inch mains that are incased in a Se inch steel casing on Bonita Rd, The appllcant would be required to extend a line from SW Bonita Rd. tP STAFF Eta T - �J�D CTION w4, i, � TIGARD -PLANNING COMMISSION April 27, 1978 Page 4 west of the site, the length of his 'property . 3. Based on the' grade difference between the property and Bonita Road severe sight distance and access problems would result . The ''Building Official and Tigard Police Departments have stated their opposition to allowing any access/egress of business traffic to this site. ° The Washington County Public Works Department and Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District have both ` II stated that the access onto Bonita is not desirable. Staff therefore concludes that an industrial site should not be created out of the railroad right-of-way as proposed due to the hazardous access conditions and the substandard lot dimensions 4. Staff is unable to administratively approve this request because t1 e Building Official has exercised his author:.ty to envoke Section 18.64 .020 of the Tigard Municipal Code referring the access question ;;. to the .Planning Commission III . Staff Recommendation: Based on findings of fact aid conclusions, staff recommends denial . '� '' /' "G:r -4�..�` "G„-,.. Richard Bolen Planning Director a • • . p' . .:',444 , I ;. O Mo . ,. ti,.,,,I# .- pPii. ILLIII ) ,r L 1 1 0 ( 1.- RI ...j - �, " e,! u' P. O,. BOX 1 27 ® tUALATIN, OF�EGON 47062 • PHONE 638.6861 ot, RUSSELL W'ASHBURN, CH/EF ' I . y April 26, 1978 . National Safety Company Rt. 1 , Box 575A ,, Beaverton, Oregon 97005 • Re: John Skourtes" Building,, Bonito Rd. at the railroad tracks ' Dear Mr: Skourtes • a As per our verbal discussion, a fire hydrant w i l l be required on your site of the proposed building at Bonita Road between the railroad tracks. Tualatin Fire District's Fire Prevention CcdP as adopted reads in part under Section 3-5.5 - "Water supply and , Fire ro 'iydr�•ants. The Fire Marshal may.require that all premises wh?re buildings or portions of buildings,ngs, other than one- and two- r si- family dwellings, are constructed and located in such a manner that access to public fire hydrants is minimal or of a distance . . '.,n such that the Fire Marshal can demonstrate that fire fighting opera_. , . 4 ti ons would be impaired, be provided with a water supply system installed in accordance with the provisions of Standard for Out- side Protection, NEPA No 24. " • In enforcing this section of the Fire Code, the Fire District uses w° , the guideline, the Ti gard City Ordinance, which requires hydrants . to be within 250 ft. of all parts of the building. Additionally, the distance from the building to these hydrants ,to be an accessible Nanner. A fire hydrant that is on the other side of a railroad track is not of an accessible location, Having the railroad tracks between the hydrant and the building would produce unnecessary delay in utilizing the water to be used in case of fire. • If you have any questions, feel free to contact me: ,if Yours truly, AL ,,.. 6' felfi-/ft't'gl--4":1:is .:. eph A. Greul i ch Fire Marshal : JAG:dm cc: Fred A, Anderson, Attorney • toilff ■ a III 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ,,r.�Receive and File. Transmittal from John R. Skourtes re: Bonita Road Warehouse. (,, Mr. Skourtes stated he wished to speak on this item. Council ,; Iconcurred to hear Mr. Skourtes. III m L P 5- 6 7. WRITTEN COMMUNICCATIONS Transmittal from Jo1in. R. Skourtes re: Bonita Road Warehouse. , (a) City Administrator stated that Council, in the past, had requested this type of complaint be presented to the staff before being considered by Council and noted that this procedure had not been followed in this specific matter. (b) Join R„ Skourtes gave a brief synopsis regarding his business back- gro a.n and noted in some detail the procedures he had followed regarding the c���c�truct' n of the warehouse suggested on Bonita Road property. Mr. illSkottrtcs requested Council direct the P'lanni.ng Director to either approve or lisapprocTe the Minor Land Partition, which had been before the Planning Sta Ef for some time, and no t,c-�d displeasure with the process and time being taken for such item„ (c) City Administrator requested Council allow him to reiterate the Cloy's position in this ,matter. City Administrator stated that the City Staff had cooperated with Mr. Skourtes as much as poss3.ble in this matter. The City Attorney had been requested to issue a f::x.ding at the request �. of City Administrator in writing, which stated a Minor Land Partition was necessaLy on this piece of property. Also the City Administrator stated that the time element in this matter was meeting cede and the staff was following procedures set forth in the Tigard Munici.p,tl Code. (d) Planning Director stated the review was completed on this project and Staff was currently waiting for correspondence from Washington County before a final detel..mination could be made. The final action on the Minor Land Partition request should be concluded by the end of the week. I . (e) Mayor Bishop noted that since this was not an appealable item. and only presented `or di;.cussior. council would not, at this time, take any further action on the iteth Consensus of Council was to close the item for " � discussion. tan 1101111MORNMIUMPWrurswwww. ; 8. APPROVE OLCC APPLICATION Flying J. Inc. (Fostway Gas & Pop Shop) 11595 SW ", Pacific Highway, PS Application. (a) Consensus of Council to table item until future ,neetin,g. 9„ AUTHORIZE CALL FOR BIDS - Police Station Addition. (a) Cony ensu.s of Council to table item until future meeting. lO. RESOLUTION No. 7S-21 RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE FINAL . PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN MAYFAIR SUBDIVISION„ IP Page 2 . COUNCIL REGULAR MINUTES April 24, 1978 . III i . ,- -..._.,......_._.......,_ , ` N 1. (i' (%'' F x MEMORANDUM I i 41 r April 22, 1978 TO: Planning Depavtment City of Tigard { FROM: Lt. Rea Police Department d SUBJECT: Construction on Bonita Road „ Mq Sir: It h, s �me to my attention that the area eat land betwe k� I the railroad tracks on Bonita Road, Tigard,, has been sold; any{ is to be used as some sot of business. As a result of this, I sent Officer Merrill of this department to do an ,)np site inspection for traffic safety. ; As °a result of this inspection (refer to memorandum from Officer Hal Merrill), I would not re,gornmend this area bur used to accommodate any type of business, ac entry and exit vould °i be very hazardous There have been 11 accidents in this vicinity during the past year. P Respectfully, R.B. ADAMS CHIEF OF POLICE 1,,,;;t1 Iff4/14,,i,<,elti / 4.-°1-------- . 8y: Lt. Donald I,,,, Rea Opeta 5.io'nlia Officer ic.e�.� RBA:AtR:ae M 4 . .* 7 , Avoid J. al MeGsae• r A-1 CITY OF TIG1.1--,i) To: Lt. Rea From : Officer Hai Merrill Subject:_ Special Evaluation Project Date: April 21, 1978 _ Sir: On this date I examined the area of S.W. Bonita Rd. between the railroad tracks, just east of S,W. 74th, and south of the roadway. This area is the proposed " site of a new businees, access to which is to be from SW. Bonita Rd. I examined this area for the possible effects that such a business might have on traffic 4 . safety in this area. After this ea-site examinationp I am of the opinion that access as it now stands, or could reasonably be arranged, is extremely hazardous from a traffic safety standpoint, and that, such a condition should not be allowed to, exist. The following observations Were made: 1. Any vehicles eoming out of the driveway onto S.W. Bonita cannot make a right turn without turning completely into the opposite oncoming traffic lane. 4 20 Any turns made from the drive to the left onto Bonita cannot Ile made safely, as the view of Bonita to the right is almost completely obscure0 due to the hill and dip in the road. 3. Vehicles traveling on S,W. Bonita from 72nd towards S.W. 74th cannot see vehicles lulling out from this driveway, until they are almost at the scene. 4. It would be very hazardous to turn left into the property from Bonita duo the angle, and the fact that agait the view to the rear would be blocked and vehicles coming on Bob, towards 74th from 72nd wouldn't be able to see any , vehicles turning until they were "in their trunk." 5. No trucks or Vans could get ift or out of the prop-rty without extreme, and possibly lengthy blockth of trafgic. 6. This driveway exit is located between two railroad tracks, both with full crossing gates, And such a situation could create varied hazards. 7. Bonita Road is not in good condition, is narrow, and rather heavily traveled, • It ha a also been the location of, many accidents and haaardous driving activities in the past, /.6 Officer Hal Merrill Tigard Police Department • i\ tx± TI ARD WATER DISTRICT _,.,____ Jara4i s. W. COMMERCIAL ST. •;IGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE (503) 635-16E4 April 21, 1978 4 it k ,.. ; 1G John Laws Associate Planner City of Tigard 12420 S. W. Main Street Re: Water service: S. W. Tigard, Oregon 97223 74th and Bonita Road Dear John: „,, The owner of the property, located between the two sets of railroad tracks, near S. W. 74th and Bonita Road, has not officially applied for water service for any new development. However, he has indicated to one of my employees that he intends to request the water district to authorize a connec- tion from Bonita Road where an existing 6-inch and 16-inch • mains are located within a 36-inch steel casing. These ", mains were installeld and paid for in full by the water dis- trict and there will be no connections to any mains within the steel casing. °` Enclosed is a drawing, prepared in June 1976 which shows „ how and where the subject property will be served domestic water. The property owner will be 2:equir`d to pay the cost • to extend an 8-inch main the full length, of his property * along S. W. 74th Avenue. The water dis 'ict will assume the difference in cost between an 8-inch and 12-inch main instal- lation. The frontage along S. W. 74th Avenue appears to be � ,/' about 650 feet; therefore, the estimated cost to serve the f�, parcel between the railroad tracks will be about $10,000. 1 (650 feet x $15/ft) . I would imagine that the fire district will require ft that a fire hydrant b n installed on the property So that t they could fight a fi!,e without layi7•g hose across the railroad. txacks. This will be an added expense to the property owner. Please advise if I can be of further ausistance. Sincerely yours, TIGARI WATER DISTRICT ■ Robert 2. S cal ttee Administrator Bncl. Map ' / •p •4: r , r ►� r� s P n LP 0 -[ ® TUALATIN3, OREGON 9786 PHONE 638-6861 ® RUSSELL-WASHBURN, CHIEF olow April 21 , 1978 • City of Tigard Planning 1k partment City Hail Ti gDrd, Oregon 97223 Attention: John Laws, Planner Re: John Skourtes Build;ng, 74th & Bonita Dear John: I have examined the site plan for the John Skourtes b ii l di ng at 74th & Bonita. I had some difficulty in measuring di st:Ances because the plan does not show any scale. There are two problems with the site plan. 1 . It would be necessary to have a fire hydrant on the same side of the railroad tracks as the building. A fire hydrant would have to be located or Bonita Road between the railroad tracks or on the site near the building, 2. The access to the building would have to be a minimum of 20 ft. wide. The proposed site plan shows only about 15 ft The turn onto the accessway from Bonita would have to meet the guidelines (copy attached) as required for emergency access for fire department vehicle':5: The present driveway has two sharp bends that would be difficult for fire apparatus to negotiated If you hive any questions, feel free to contdct me, Yours truly, ‘S) 71.410' 40406 4eph A. Gr'eul i ch re Marshal I, JAG,dm ` y a 4 • b ` Nrzs ,a b. 404 '' iii • t - TO : JOHN LAWS, PLANNING DEPARTMEN'� . # FROM: ED WALDEN, BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: April 20, .1978 �4 SUBJECT: JOHN SKCJURTES PROPERTY ,, S.W.' Bonita Rd. , Bev k, ween Railroads Trac i t Per your request, with reference to Section i8. 64. 020, paragraph G,; ,pity Code, regarding access to private property from public •N righ -of-way, Be advised that upon visual exr iination by the Building Depar Lment of subject land and the ac,o?s,,.4 and egress thereto it is our finding that it would be extremely hazardous v especially for large trucks and semi-trailer rigs. . 4-, The narrowness ,�f' the street and the elevations of the street and land are such that we would recommend no business traffic be allowed in and out of the property. Even, if improve,msnts were made in the ''access by filling and leveling, etc. , the proximity of two rail lines would make it very hazardous for large trucks entering and leaving the property. . ' i., -40" 1 P'! E.T. Walden v • ! Building Official b 0 III ,a ' IU1� ..r "5 ..' ... iaYt.:...:et�w.:.. gnu•wWm M.,rew,. ...k.,.:..,y..; M« a'vva•.wt.'q.no+nnn..wn»� .. ..•.tit++w.+++-n»+ h„ ••„, ..,: ` .....,... .. ...... .....�.. II t. j b , /, , . sol a 1 ;�i; Ir, M wwl» . A 0 1JE i�. i r� OTC N3tf...In.J'1• .f�:ty o. , in, �, -1 } I Pt. 7, E o x 575�5 I..I :J 1 p1'i OF i U ,��i R;:J ` B. a v.. ..ton; Or...-.-2.)n 97005 April 15, 197'3 . Tigard Olt\ Council . City of T1g%a.J . P.O. Box 23397 7.2430 S.W. Main Tigrd, Oregon 97283 ,......40, Subject: d■ ect' 10,200., l . steel Jsrehoua� M-3 zone `�! Road 3oni_t+e , ..an tlomen Re,ue t tali minutes of y'u'xr t7 m,.! April al , v--)73 cou-r i1 i'lrwAai:i ng for ' the following: t1 , 7 , 1 /' ' 1 1 review, s► ,;M a . Direct planning , �1�,a�_-�,m,�nt (Richard Fso_���1� to ,.tili.�ir ��.'r plat; (building location) Tuesday morning -- April 25, 1978. Pro.,,re d , tiae involved fiv", minutes. This will allow 'la to take the engineered plan: to the building department and r":ceive i ermi,ebion tc 1�ygin foun- dation work. IIIWe ha e ben told that Nancy Sdwerds of the plannin c tsf f will need a an additional four weekJ to review the landscaping and site plan, a Planning d,..paa,:tmeu t to 'tote has stnlle0 my project for ei j'_1G weeks under thr, shied") of iu terpreta ting municipal codas in fe- or~ o.f sts 'f, completely disre r-rdi g h 7 �nterpnete t c i of city gent to,lether C1 V'J C I c] tF .:� A with Ghe p+rtac i:icel facts of the case. 1 • In a'f'fect we have been i 1 why should we o aiat d cit:i ::i, oiho Ilse a. unique situ. :inn (1 e t him wait in line) .) . �h ere er°F always' enough re w A�1ti 6titens on the b Ieke to jv.ist:i£fir indless delay John , Skl)1;ir to,'°� '' .:-,e c:i.+wry..il t n -. A ii A A '�... .".�..w.+;.,.M. -..-a ,omn'. .wa.b,1 w.+wx.syi.r ..» w .,,...'V'..u..,w.{y5••{IYw. r u..,. M.«.✓..... ..rl.....w.....;.....�aw++r. .. ,. .S,1 � ,,, . . ero;.-1).49-71;2ey ' ..p- lier' ns,,,,,,----?- 9 tee ... 714,12'- -*Cn4i131;13' to2." 14;974/ 777-41L,1( '1 sky, "3.3,q7 1 1, - M�t P 'wv fi r. -4 4r.,p,„, 7q ..372:474'''.,. ._��� .. _..", ,. 'W V";e2:17/7-114;11;r4 /7---.......... ....:. w.., A 4 !1 r7...;/47.` ICY.... ^. _ F R r.02- 6,,ez -9-7' 719. 16, v .727)4 - z cl7P - N . . . . , . . " . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . , . ■ . , . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . -/, ' . . .. . . . . 1 . . . ■ . . . . . . . ! . . . , . . . 1 . . . , . . . . . . . . , . . , „ . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . .. . . .! . . i!!),-- . . . e7 3" 1 . . . . . . . .' . . . . . . . . ., .. , . . ------L--,---.. ..?;-,,.,,_1.f,...._(.../..,?4..._,_,' ,,d.4..":.e.. c106. 0_ 1 . 6,tivfr:1-0,- ,--1 . ;:ir ,%), :,,..,-.."- pf;le!- 4Z'1( e ,,,z, . , - s-S ,,,......! .,!..., ,---qt. - , . ;._ 0 '' !.., ,, ! , ! , '.,,„.....„,L,_,......--.„.___<_. 4'4" 4.4", '-' d.,,.0'''''' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' evtx./ .. .."' ''' ' , , --,.........._ / ." iA l i i /: ?'- /6/. jeet 0 171c7 O'3 o ( ) '. : . e . . . . ',....cCe5.5,„:,,.„.:.„3 g,..,,..‘,.,.,.,---......,,,,J-,TY „ ,/ i .,. . „).e/c. 1,-c,..e.,,.,..., ,.. if , qiti ° y,0 ... (0 'if, !fly ' -2 f v ' _ ,, ., ,• . . (3.) (/ . • ..., •. .i 1 C", . . , . . ei-i.....,;. ,.... . ., ,......-- ..7„, --e- c . . .... ...,.. .,. ...._,.. .. . 1 1 I . . , , I . ' 1 . ,1 . . ' ,. . 1 . 1 , 1 .. , . 1 1 d■ ' ' .1 .. . ■. .yo*....... , ' . ,- •. d r ■ • , .}n te—,t ,nU2 .— Ce 1 49,,,,, i,L,,( 6t. \I< ,. - . 6 0 , , _._,. .. . .., . .. .. •• ,4.-.a.n .w r.«^,r...at., e,arrr-J. .,..m.a -..:nra,w-,,,.,,+«�, ,:.,.,n„ .,.rf. w: .r r,--.-. ..... -�•,u__ „i,.,r,x _ a,,,-,n,.,t x .,,, ,_ -..- ,... - pia,.r « .-„•,.- .^ - - , r,n.,a, r ,.. 1 , , �!'' „ � ..r ,T a-,•,,,.aau W- w'..x:r---..a.r ,.v- :,_1t'„Ir,r,.n.,., Tr•,., «[� ..,i- - . -,...,cr ....e .-„,.a-i ,a „. _.a e.....,a. w ��„' u,yw,-,.r.,+...,- -..rry --.r. ,n,.,...,—n=...we..,...+u.. ,,:x.-vs..e.w.xmn»'a..-.a -..•..rsa .�,...•.. ..n a.Ar-...f., •..,, ._..a a..-.,x..,_, s..,.aa i,F,a-a. .,,._•+-+�,'+,��wr.,.,s.�+'' .0..�.. .. �,e,.,w ,... ., _. ,,..,_.. x=.. ..... ... ..... .. V. v A i” ._.......,........re.c,.4. •1, �1. +w,.rf-,.-,w... v....t, ,,,..i s:�r. «ca.,-x ,. �--.r,..erne aa..e�,.. .a•._n�.n,s' -^_.. - s,rv...,-,R,-.a ...,r- -[_ „ n _..-�a. ., - -- � ' . a M J, 1 r -... ■ r,-, ............. ..._- ti "�.. �\ 1 • w 7., 7'4 i' ( 4 / , ,, , „ . , j,,,,, _ ,,, , ,. _ „,,,,,„ . „ .„ .,, ., , ,, ,, 4 a,.■4 ■ hill I +. , ■ a•w.,n.e.ww...•�y+,r�e.....,•.r,+ .... u.. ..± m r y N A. m � 0 a ANDERSON, nITTMAN ,Ek ANDERSON ZARNEYS AT LW TIGARD PROFESSIONAL. CENTER SECEIVED , 8865 S. W. CENTER STREET . P. 0, BOX 23006. TIGARC4 OREGON 97223 APO .1 7 197B 639-1121 ", FRED. A. ANDERSON April 10, 1978 G L & DERRYCl< H. DITTMAN ROGER F. ANDERSON o Mr. Joe D. Bailey Attorney at Law P . 0 . Box 399 , Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Dear Toe : :' t: . indicated to you on the telephone last week, I have been requested to assist John Skourtes in connection with the problem arising frow the small tract abutting upon S. W. Bonita and inter- vening betws,in Southern Pacific right-of-way and S,P & S right-of- way. While you indicated that you felt that the minor partitioning -' requirements of Chapter 17 .24 of the Tigard Municipal Ciode were 7 applicable here, you also stated that if Ihaci a differenb opinion and could give you a reasonable basis for the outlook that Mr. ° Skourtes is entitled to a I-Juilding permit without minor partitioning approval, you would con-,ider it Review of Section 17. 24 .010, in light of the factual situabion involved here, gives rise to the viewpoint that approval of parti- i. tioning is not required in this instance for the following reasons : 1. Section 17 . 24 . 010, in pertinent part, is ouoted: "A tract of land or contiguous tracts under single ownership within the city shall not be partitioned into two or more parcelo for transfer of ownership, bzvelopment or for any other purpose 80 as to con- ,. filet with mou:Irements of this title . " As you knows the southern Pacific right-of-way extends ) interciby, intercounty, interstate and perhaps international and does riot Pall wholly within the City, The normal tax lot or tract designation with resoect to other ownerships does not apply to railroad right-of-way or utilities which are asSessed and taxed by the State Department of Revenue, rather than by Washington County. The tax lot philosophy, therefore,, crinot have pertinence in this instance . r Mr. Joe D. Bailey April 10 , 1978 Page 2 2. The Skourtes tract with .hick we are concerned is within the city but it qualifies and has qualified as an ownership entity separate and apart from the rail- road right-of-way as shown on the assessment map of Washington County, a take-off copy of which I have attached for your ready reference, and as such has been in existence long prior to the enactment of Ordinance 68. 48 of the City of Tigard and its counterpart Ordi- nance 74-3. Putting this into its proper prospective, inasmuch as there is not involved partitioning of the railroad right--of-way,, but the exis- tence of a tract has been a fact long prior to the adoption cif the ordinances, and the peculiar circumstances of the ownership and assessment facts, I feel, that Lhe minor partitioning require- ,rnents are not applicable. In any event, I request that you point out to the planning people that the delays inherent in obtaining site plan review and issuance of building; permit should not thwart orderly development of an obvious situation such as this where the applicant can easily support his View that he is being singled out for special treatment by reason of previous problems with the city, and in any event of reasonable doubt of the applicability of the regulation, the matter should be resolved in favor of the applicant under normal statutory guidelines . Very truly yours, ANDERSON, DITTMAN & ANDERSON Me4e-e ' Ara FAA/day co John Skourtes nwrruaJrauvr'wnwm...rm;.,A.Fa+....,w o. .um2-.n�w�,.m......w.,..,.,..".•.r .�^' a, „ . 409) S. \.w. NINT1-I' AVEt .1l= 0 • if.„.. ,� t�a 5± r PORTLA�I pREGOH 972Q5 (� tt L:itA._�+.,Q) "' . c..- .r _ .-•0 N ' ,' r�+1 .. ,� 540 i '' .4. 4.50 At, `' �.: .aq 9.:{. 230 old ir[A t i � SCHOOL 4 � � Q 5� �1f95 r.ae This pt`Int it gilt% Sal I'¢7, t,, `fiptirpuse at astisti g\ M , w !1 :°!J °° x 'c' in locating �"t'�.7! ��, a',-n dt���7 �ZtJ� !lahilily tar !{u i0�1 6-,anY, ell's3 w \ �� r z' 11.- , y `^` kcve'.;_?'1,`L----. -- 1 _ __v'rsT r I.4' i,Sr�021';Y 2�O� J ,crt rr�n-->+stia.rta;� ,-� --f--.-4- _._,a..r "r-44, 'c R -1- ,k ` p `�,,y� °S. Vi �"'� 1 J O�1 1 ,� r ' E G 11d G Pi..730 -• I .,..._r,,7,� 3—. i 165 oI 'l v 't'o.'' 2�—___—,r,.....70—.—§—`� w, 4 J1 I Old ry •) , i 11 1 4 �.• � �2000 0 S�. , �� ' G 8 t /.1;!, 0. N hk 1901 BOO P1 .5 10 1 °a.4rA,`6 x.8�j ': . 1 14r. I r ~'� o a:. t I'm ....1 b cS ., A i �1`. t'� l I too' ' �...,. to I ; a;4 2. co l;�0.l 3 2 L?9 �r' •4 f IC5>�tc.1t2IS} 4-:?.90.4,, (+1�yy pp 2+ r /"y ' MOO �a9."' �__ .. 1�IlI n . • t�,CM /.67'441c. 1: t, P o 0).. ..� ,,� a fr t t ) P. ir,�' ~ n.____ --- __ .._ �, Y fir" —...« 114 3.0d /.99 A.. «• i ----'' _ ,""i) 1 i ` ! M ' ■�w.. «+.... _ .... L! '.:t"at.Q+,-.•"u' . 1 ......�,.--..F D,T .1._..,`n"7,n"_.0•i 1.L_......_..+.�... .\71 91 •1 11 c 00 \ 2101 .$..Y A ,b .a 6 c. r?I�.�,C. ( 4 7 tsi,r �l, W — 200 .,.„-:., I 1 . t n 2 A ' � s s : ra` } c - 4 8 2100 cA 1`941j ' oL....-j " ° _ d 19 ni r 0.4 '1 2 2?U � • 204.34' ` . ;,:e/c. 4C S No,III ).16), i 1 . 1."0 0 �kji\I C'', l,dt7.4c.C,S i5002 to in00 ; , 6 v 2& 0 -. 1.._� , _� �_ . • ----- 310 20'. n.111,4 c. { I ,p \. 17 4. V �i4jiprr3, I:R�.f L. G 54 i. � y r , C j i,�. 4t, 1 I r �S ! �� o .r j� j , �' {.I': /`(:—r ':— 4 Q't •`+..i 1 'S� ' f,I ) 15�00 i � J ! ;�-1..:, Jam" 1 li r, .,-) , X23 1'!5 ! f 1 t`- 2144 lI J / — ...rwr_ .. . . . "—. ._ I 1 r ) v , \ %, I I ‘(' 'C4 v,.3 , ,,- , 1 1 ,,,,, , p . 1 , ' .. „. - ,.... xh} .e.,x'MitWltl,4tlVUKt:iA. Kam.1.,„e„,..,..r._.+._- vpt+. .{Ifrlk'+XtgM...n.+' r.•+, r I i. /+.. ._ , . , . , , , , , ., .•.. .. , , .., • , . . , . , 4,,,,,,„ „ ,,RARTIVIENT OP COMMERCE-PLANS REVIEW 5'ECTION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW PAGE 1 of 7--4-t--' , • • . 'ROOM 376,STATE OFFICC BUILDINc3,PORTIANP 97201 ' ' rN.,t;71.40x.! *% IS NOT A nt,altqc PEne'IT) bria".-rvni■'s,,, . (THIS a , , 78-320 \'■".51.7 Builditg.,:; Nati,onal SafetySi _ 74_th & Bonita Road,_Tigar- ..,.. .._.., _ No. —___,-___ '--,.to-q.' . Building Adclie';";- V-,N 80 000.00 98.80 • ' couritc', __Wash.itigt.on_ r\,,up ,y _B.2 '_. Const._ —___--,...'Sound Value......_ .0 '.-..--- Plan Fee .._ , 4- , Architect LeRoy V. Th,omas : . . New Bldg. ] Addition 0 Alteration al Date Received .._.7,_ ..._ . . '. ____ _- --Owner„_ „N.L9 ,—_ Address — NiS , ___ Date Reviewed _ 3°30°78 ' „ .. ' ' Stories _Una__ Area1,420-g-/-N./S Attic ..' —1//-..S-, ,Fire VValls.....1./...q-Piro E5caposi_N/S EXIts____..? -,' 6 ft : , , .. Main Flr, Besernent Ht. Stcps Tot, I Stair, _ LI.11)- - Vert. Shafts N/S Sprinklers -X /-"'_' /- "'' Man Alarm' _N/S S,P, - N./S ' /- 7'- , Closed' ' ' Closed No Yes Area(.-.'o-ver d . See Int, Size. Ex.:., . Ext. __-__ NtS Ht. Det,'"':, NiS ..-/- _Conc._ Metai/Wood Coiling -...NeP5.........._ RoofRp....m.a.rics.Str, Members . Cif.ISS No, Typr, Area Cowl. Floor ., ''q'' ' Wail cover _ -1i0..±.a.11-_NY.3_, Fitr, 'rm. end, ,...--.L..1\115____,. Type,flue'-. ../$ TYPe Htci. System _.,_, N/§....__-_- Fuel —N(.S..-..... . Ert, Int, . . The submitted plans have been reviewed for conformity with fire' n protectio statutes and regulations of Oregon admin. . ,.. istered by this office, Items No—___iti_s_172___? ..1_7,78.2_,36 ' . . ,,. checked on the enclosed list are appilcable. These i'erns and any specially noted provisions must be incorporev'ed into . , ,, , the project to meet current fire protection regulations, Approval of,submitted plans is not an approval of ornissw;ns or. . oveis,ights by this office or of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of-local government. ..',,,,. , -- - _ _ kEMARKS: __,T.111P rexiew is bap .4__pn._the_r'..,coject being_located in Fire Zone #2. . _ . ' .A) .Roof covering shall_ be fire_ tetardant. _ _ ._..._. .._ . , J3).„.Q-0,,ardrail_shall be T.'ecluired for bot.13ramps....._ Guarcraile_shall be not less than 4:! inches - __.....1.4..-.“.I.....-..,•■••■•,.... ' __,,,i ri_he ight with nsLopeniiro_exc,:_q,e!iirlkL 9 inches,. , th_at .aqn..erat@ a spatk or glow. shall---not-1;:e---tnst-'a-fied or used within 18 inches . , , ___ __...... , ____._ ' lo' ...,pf, tbe_floor. . I/* .......■ Fr., .11 1.)._) The use handlingi and storlge of Flammabl--e *.iquids in this bl-1,11-aing -a-1—T- i-41-) — -----r----7,,re-7.„7' - - ...., ,,,,,,..% /.....,,,,,-,' , , Examineckby., ,e r7:- . ...,....,,,,r, . _---,-1.- - 6* ' Copies to _ApplicantjlilelDep.utypSif42.0w-ner',.Bidg.Dept;Ifire Dept..vEle . . , , ., Pi,s.2 ' ' '- 7"----------. sp426585,814 - • , , , , 4 , , • , , PAGE 2 of 2 .. , , . DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE--PLANS REVIEW SECTIOf' , NOTICE OF PLANF REVIEW 4,,, ,Ns .. POC.VA 376,STATE OFFICE SUILDING,PORTLAND 97201 I , (THIS IS Not A BUILDINt MIT) , IT,,,"',1•;" , • Building National Safetiy Co 74th, & Bonita RoadATigatd No _78-32Q , , BAldmq Address , ,. . ccor dance with the provision,of t he _Un,iform. .B_ui./...aing..,_clQd.e..p.._,S.tan.dard...,11o...._1-0...1..,__ E) All glazing bubject to ILuman„Impac,t 811a b e ji.L'Islaq,,,, ____ 1 -•.1 . F) Plans are act,eatabij:7 a subrtlitiged ,sule,j.eqt.t9 _the..i.t.o.ra. ..n.Q.Le_d_aliove_and...the_approvai____ : - , , _ __ of the agthoritit.,§, haying_ittri,sdicti.On..,._____ _ . , , . 1 -- ---__-_—_, —-- , _ . ,.4. ' 1 , , , ' ------, -......41 ..,e•■■•••W.,••.............,...*..................,*,............,........,....,*,.....,.....,..,-,•,,N,--*,.,..—,.. .4.a..........■•■. ' ..,_.— , , , , , 1 , — H • , ------- --- . , , , , • , , -,----- , - --... . , 4 , , . , , ■ , . . .,. 4 . r " ' v. ST07" re.. 'OIFGON F•tr,e & Life Safety A iopted 9--1-•77 DEPARTMENT MENT O1'' COMME�r,,: e'lnns Review Number2 1.:,.- % �r� PLANS REVIEW S►'uTION C1tECK-UAREED RE WLATrONS, IN ADDITION TO ANY REQUIREMENTS APPEARING ON THE ATTACHED REVIEW NOTICE, 'MUST 1117• INCORPORATED INTO TI{TS PROJECT. Approval of submitted ptend does not constitute approval of any ,missions or over- sights nor of noncottipliar;ce with any applicable regulations of local government that i may exceed Sate requirements. 1. Structure required to be Type throughout due to ( area) ( heig,nt) ( occupancy) (Fire Zone ). f 2. One-hour fire resistance rating required for all interior construction. e 3. All living units required to be completely 'separated by one-hour fire resistive constetactiee. III 4. Exit corridors require sepaeattion from any other' area by one-hour fire resi:etive 4onstruction. 5. Door assemblies of interior openings to corridors are required to have e fire resistance rating of not less than 20 minutes and must be self-closir or automatic-closing. Relights in corridors require wired glass set in fired • (steel) framing. See 1973 Sate Structural Specialty, Code, Sections 33O4(h) and 4306. 6. Storage rooms, closets, laboratories, shops and areas of e'mflar hazard require separation from other areas by at least one-hour fit resistive construction. Furnace and boiler rooms require one-hour fire resistive construction., y 1, All vertical openings stir!'• as strait ways, trash chutes, etc,, require full enclosure of ( 1-hour) ( 2-hotr) fire resistance. Access ways to stic,h shafts require self-closing and':latching Clash; g fire door assemblies 1-hour rated) ( 1'j-hour rated). S. Attic areas require draft barriers tae par.Sec. 3205, not, exceeding each 3,000 sgeare feet. (9,0001 squere feet where sprinkler protection provided.) . , 9. Voids created by ceiling-floor syettms require ttrnft barriers not exceeding each 1,000 ,quire fret.' 10. Building projections such as balconlee, eaves, overhangs, etc., require fire protection as per 1977 State Structural Specialty Code. Seeeir,n 1710, :r, . it Fire stops,, blocking or framieg mumble, platted for utility tuna; require el ... 0 parking to equal fire resistance prior 'to sut.11 pierci tg. Wood frame 0 construction requires firestcrpping of. both vertical .end harir.ontel draft tai�ening rat hlnitltlutna Intc'rvnit, hI 10 fret. `.•' ,.�" 4,,,3. i-, .1 17, Corridors requirt� nt Irnst 6 f.cet ire clr,lr wlrtth. Drtnlcing fountains or other {,r") equipmltttt may not t�perate to a m.tnnl r which 'would obstruet the rninintum 6-foot width. 13. klcuidrai.d rtre requ1 red on all stairways. 5t a rrr�aye outer 4J1tl wide a1r z,�1 he bra bath cider„ I' 1+ Open b1 air r ail.ingEi £end gura.rdrtiil ri td- tt'l have intorredirtte rails br cloeurecc with na apt'na>agr3 large t:noulxh to pass n 911 sp}tt!re. . 15. Ertit doors Lrotn ioblait.s, currldots .1lad rttua with poto'i1t,t1 orc:ul,nncies of 5� or mere are rr'gtiired to whys in the dirlicttun of i�xlt lr.tvel. 16.E"� Exit du:rs from lobbies, corridors and osserbly area; a ecieirc panic hardeinre, 1 17 Hardware ter all doors is required to be of ,1•lple type having no provisions foe locking against egress, with obvious method of operation. Flush tits °thee then listed rlutotrsiic are not accept.rtble. 111, At lutist 40, (i'ni live) In clear width, without 1rrr.,Jt'ct ienc, le rreel red for exile and pit.Iettt t'otiw dr,ure t.tsi17iq h w111t t1 p,ltlt'`w e meat le, t lonel,'rted iu whl't'Itll,)I re, !,t rl•i 1,her a us both, 1 1 1. h I .h a l o,, '1 m a n', 1 N t t 1 1 r I'' It 11,.141 I,1 1 o w 1 1 r l,'s t 1 1 i 1 1 1 l y epee 1 1 1 1, I 1 . , 1 t 1•,l t l t wI l 11„1 1t .ovi•I,,1 ton l', ,1111I pi(Ivlllllig ,i 1It•,11 ope11Ito, ..1 it 10.,.. 1 11.11, !•pis .1,1',:Ita inthei hi with the Irma, d isl'tis,11.1a not lent, thou ?, I In lll•!1, It 1t IIwir, 1. s t11t 1 t t'd 10'18111 t,, y 1 bottom of opeeieg I tots f leer ie 4it iltr,;�7t,. ' rite„I c llt.r. 1104, 20. Surface flame spread rates of wane and ,.titlinge, minimum 'tequieeeetlta stairway - 251, corridors - :5, other 'rooms »'225, (Sec, 4203) . 21. Gtttnbustib1e a coti;,tical material •r•c,,atrt.d to be secured with jtlp'ies or equivalent intltalltt holdr*rt;' or a heat rest;atant adhesive capable of with- i e , 4,,e..„. n ..—. r- /`. .. .. ..n5..ra w e.•..7,,*.»,... .:n m a-e�•o mm 1 l 'A I III T22. All ct.►rtitns,,tir.npee nerd nimilnr fernishinge ere rrqutren to rte nueconmuletu,u or rendevede ' mnintntned P1nmeproof.. j 23. With strendrord epnctng, rows of seats between .rise'iey may net exceed 14. Rows of gents opening onto aisles at one end only miry not exceed 7 seats. Ala° see continental spacing, Stec. 3313-3314. 24. Standard seat row spectng must provide a space of at least 12 inches from the )11 back of one seat to the front of the most Enrwaed projection of the seat ' • imnedtntely behind. 25. posting of capacity of assembly areas as noted is required by State Structural Code, Sec. 3301(,0. m. 26 �Htating, oolong; air conditioning and similar service equipment are required to be approved and listed by a nationally recognized testing agency, such as U.L., Inc., and to be installed in compliance with agency's specifications and o' recognized safe practices.. The installation'of ventilation ,yst'tms is required , to be in substantial conformity with the 1973 Mechan;c:.i Specialty Code. I ; Corridors are not acceptable for use as supply Jr return air plenums, . 27. A duct collection system is reeei •ed for shop areas for raonporeable machines s'. p emitting or producing dusts, (Ret: Sec. 101)8) Dust collection equipment . ,, r'. to be located outside of building or in one-.lour separated roam equipped wi automatic sprinklers. , 28,' ,1!,, .S.M.E. approved pressure relief' valve!, are required for all water heater;;, ~;° f'installed either in separate water tank port or in pert for hot water line. ChutoEf valves may not be located between a water tank and relief valve. r' 29 A ftrefiehttttg water supply is required within 500 fort of building that i; cepable of producing )00 spin (minimum) for 10 a tnutes foe each 5,000 neu,ere feet of floor area within building up to a maximum of 500 gprn for 30 minutee, • or provide a 5,000 to 15,000 gallon reserve water supply no required. 30. interior wet standpipes at leeet 2 inc a in diameter located and equipped °' 1 , as per Sec, SO4 3 are requited. Couplings end connections required to be Amery an National Standard Thread. Where st►3ndptpes are served by sprinkler piping, see 1973'NCPA Pamphlet +13, '3-7.7. ,, 31. Approved �automitic >prinkler protection throughout occupancy is required. ;a� ip I 32, Approved automatic sprinklers are required over and under stage and in all auxiliary area, including dresstnp rooms, storerooms and workshops. (Sec. 3802) 4. 33. Stare roof ventilators displacing at least 5% of stage floor area, openable by by hand from stage floor and by fusible link or other heat acti°�jated device, . .' are rewired. (Sec. 3901-06) 6 34, An approved tire alarm syr„em ,„cnformirtg to 1972 NE"PA Pa,.tphlwt '//72-A with signnle audible througheue 'nailing And manual alarm sanding stations i djncent . to ext±s from each floor e r area are re-;wired. . I 35. 22" x 30" accent, attic epacea in required per Section 3205. , •1, ' e � 36 ` All e>,it doors and Access ways thereto are 'required to be Identified by approved e '' F n'l.ectticelly illuminates:' signs served by two circuits with one separate from alt othet circuits, (Sec. 3312) a 37. An emergency power system i:4 required for the ( )gymnasium ( )auditorium ( )heilding to maintain exit illumination for net less than uneehalf hour '`J t in event of public utility feilure. 36. Fluorescent light Ei>.tures installed on ttenbut►tiblc' surfaces are required to • be U.i.,, inc., approvtct for such mounting, or installed to provide at least lk inch air space betweet, the fixture hauling and combustible material. 39. Conformance with all regtsirement:S, for the removal of architectural barriers ' 0 to the harn .capped is required.' See applicable pests of 1973 State Structural 1 Specie lty Code, Ssotiotte 17110 1712, 1711, 3302„ 3303,, 3305, and 3305 And Tab h , Nu. 33A. A NOM: 1. Loeal eeettlaelon t or insurance Standards for most fitvbrAble inser.tnre ' coedit may, and often do, ai.cer.c theca minimum State requirattet7te, l 2. Ibis review dons not never 0,S.E,A„ (0.S,lf.Ae) regulations. , 4 3. This re rxe0 dues not c.ovor Medicare-1adlcade regulations. . 4. Crogee 'Suite Health Oepartment. k ,� ., , GEARIN, LANDIS & AEIBI 1lE $cEnmo LAWYERS $ 1516 GEORC3IA—PACIFIC BUILDING MAR 3 J, 1978 PORTLAND;OREGON 97204 TELEPHONE(50::3)224-6532 JOHN CORDON GEARIN CATY Of TIGARD • OA'ID C.LANDIS FREI., M.AI . JOE C3-BAIL JEFFREY M.rIATCHELOR March 29 , 1978 , FRANK A.MOSCATO .i, JOHN C.MERCER • ,wa' , City Administrator ., City Hall ;14 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Skourtes Minor Land Partition , Our file; 12,836-3 . Dear Raeldon: You spoke with me briefly at Monday night' s council meeting about a conversation you had had with M . Skourtes in which he had taken the position that h i is not required to comply with Chapter 17. 24 Minor Land Partitioning of the Tigard Municiple Code. AS I told ..) you Monday night the planning department contacted me about this question a couple of weeks ago, and we dis- cussed the issues over the telephone then. In response , to the conversation you and I had. Monday night I have once again looked at the problem, and my opinion is the same at this time The controlling language of the ordinance is the following: "A tract of land or contigucus tracts under a single ownership within the city shall not he partition,A. into . . two or more parcels for transfer of N ownership, development or for any other purpose so as tr, conflict with the re- quirement8 of this title. Minor land partitioning shall not be undertaken . except a8 herein provided after compliance with procedures set forth in Sections 17. 24 . 020 through 17. 24. 050. (Prom Section 17. 24.010) . " The language that creates the class of things affected by the chapter is "A tract of land. " I cannot , e") think of any characteristic of the form in whicla a railroad company ownr, land that take q that land outside Lhis descrip- _ „ tion or, frx any other reason, takes the land ouuiide the operation of the ordinance, I am very confident that there g: ( " ••• •• lid. City Administrator March 29, 1978 Page 2 is nothing about the railroad',s ^`.znership of the land, that takes it outside the ordinance. Y hope that Mr. Skourtes will not regard the politeness of this response as indicating that am not firm in my opinion. Very truly yours, d,,(04_, oe D. Bail JDB/clg . t, I • 'a, "'Riem^n+..,,.......,....n. .airC ew..r.rrm+Y^ ....i... _ . , ,, t 11 w ^i it "�� •1 MEAORANDUM TO: File e FROM City Administrator, R. R. Barker ' ' SUBJECT: Conversation with Mr. & Mrs. John R. Skourtes DATE: March 27, 1978 • From 9:20 A.M. rD 10:10 A.M. this morning, I discussed with Mr. & Mrs. John - ' R„ Skourtes his proposed minor land partition and construction of a Y•: rehouse on 'T'ax Lot 4000, located at 73rd Avenue and Bonita Road. After listening to Mr. Skourtes' description of his problems, and his criticisms • of the Planning Staff, T made the statements summarized below: 1. The Planning Staff has numerous projects they are working on which were submitted to the City prior to Mr. Skourtes': . 2. The City will process his project as soon as it can, but will not put his project ahead of other projects. ,_,. 3. We will treat Mr. Skourtes fairly and will apply the same policies and ordinances to his prOjects as we have with other projects. 4. The City will not proceed with his project until we ate certain he • has a legal lot according to the City coot:.. . 5. Promised him I would confer with the City Attorney about whether or not the minor land partition is mandatory in this case. If it is mandatory,„ then he must follow the appropriate steps outlined in the City's Ordinances. If the minor land partition is not required, then we will proceed with the design review. cc: Joe Bailey ,; r . p b • AN0. ( ..... ..,.Y.. ., iriWL .•....'nvcwtYetli 4n ,. ,.., ......,...., ..1 .b... .mpi ea*L.�rau*e+..++n..+*1.we..•a+v. w.,� � - � X41" = i i t w r .. 1. , i , C\ 1 _ ! . \ ; . „„ .,",„\‘,„\\,_,,,\.„\L„ -\\_ k'',' ,': : , , , , „ „„ „N\,.... .„- ,,,,_ „..: 1... , . „. , t . ..,,c.. Ik\J r,--„„' \L t ., %.,,,,. .,, ,,,_ : -17\f,"1 .t, v i: ..HS: ! ',r. -\ \v4., i; ,) ''' ,,,, \ ," "t , , -ill.?- ; 44 . t .s-1 .,'N \ A 1' N ! :,.., , , I ,, «AS' : '- 4\ j A\ i 1 = \ ": ' , tt_!: 41, • ., ix i\ 1 ( - - 7, 1 „ .., , , _ ,7,,, 1 \!,,,t,,,,„:4‘ iiy I , ,\, ',' ,, , _7,% - ;,, i I N . )- — 4\3 , ' 1; . Y. i t .�}( JJJ 1 - i\j,,, -,} - t i ' ,_ ::,_ _ ii f 1 sN\71,':' . , '' N.'; , ;\ ; 14 1. ';\,- _ y \ti i �1y� 4 - tt - j :1\\:: c -- 1814"46\-- z - - J_- ) !\ 1\i ` - -{ s ;GAL - $ - li, - - E ki* ; F -AA\; I.N = , : f. t _ - 4'i E rs _ E E Y ` 4 .1' \ t \\' , 1:: . . t ' f ;''I, 5 kii\%,. : ''r \. - :(k iN N i • 1 _R , , .. .. ,, , . . .. , , ,,,, ,„ \ , , . . , ,•, ,, „. . t, t _,...,,, _ k _ i , , , , _ , , _ . . , , _. : , k 11 , t, - • : A ' ':-" , /: t. j i E ff t s ., F \ i, k„-\\ !.. ```..- It, , . . . i 4 h, _;.....1 ,,,*:,..., i ; „..a. , . ,,.. r i , . 111- , 1. ; , __, ..\ ,,, , ; :!.,110 , . - c,"'\\1-- 1 ; o , _ t; i,-, i t i ! r‘ 't\ i ''„ \\ i ' ' ; 1:4 X ": \ 21, ..1 i r ', :„. , , , : , f 'i,, \A„\ ‘A : F. ; '. ; \; 1 i , ;_ );ft ; . i t i t a , 1, ,, i ! k ; _ s {tt T Nii., f Y x Is :: : : .,,t:Ir„ i ..,!:!: : • i f ; 3 ' —- .s k - 5 - a # 6 - , - ( P I , i i S s ` x i - _ i Jry M• .4 ,1, „,„...4.....;„„M,A',.�11r�_.r.1 Gam,€w...4 ..� 1 '0 • r C;J ,Jf 1�,; Irk' + \� t,4.-j r`1:1 {'?,. '' ZOOV",.;�d',�'k fi s„ , b + ,�1''I'1vC,9'7' �,r.y tI`\ }■ IT,'t•;” 1�f-1 ",-1 r-iw go d 7g \,?00 I's'3,av'¢r7'i L �',✓ \ a�fri{I�iii�(r//L,N y:r.�ry�:•n:l!;...,v;,.6g o�v,%%Iii%/y�:1/;f i.,rr}ll✓' ;,/szrr.ri.r,k Y.iir//.✓o r/4 ' 'ter �tr ,365' lfilr] I t11� lv '0092 IVY-00 92 vd,v et 0092' �934� i53,Y 67 1571., l� ,2 fir; l c1 111 vu:l�ice' i%;1111 C,,,1 cr i yp,9t I„0002 0'0$4 ,6'.i3 15VM ir, s it,O 1 (1.al I'ON'S"T.e!" At i4 t 697 ,19V3 I ,002, 1. 9 '1,ZS Gt'1:76477—, �„,, '+� 1HOnOS Hd3$Of 't.100'JII' '' 1,1 +'`N'''7".'' '• ' , q• ,(9IZ11'0N's '0V5' 'I}' ,,a, ,CS'' ,a4,4'11 ilt�'{'Ij'ii.1 1It',{'''Ir�t 0,� r) y 11 I►^giw.,4vt`r11,.!.7�'le'9IG 7,' '�+I1 -7.1i 14 Ii , f r --•-'fir 't•.: Yt'11 ` !,,'''. '';tVt/.'P"10•.'14114 {Ii ciri': 110,, • r 9 i • k1. 7,L: N • , 5 �'•�d d 1'd 'D „11 Y.°J.'•', r,P.i+•;. ;•1•:i2VU .1i :�3iv ' '1/y,4,e?'oop Gtl� V `'ti Intl ) yi. `, I 'i - I1/-0092 '''' ; ”' 1 U 1 . t� 1.r. f'{t";,,,,. fi V 3a i,Yrug 1,, _a Y a ' •--, - :f 11. +iir.:151:,fi.rrt.,,,,40.n.'.C.•,,,,:,,f a V1 7 8 O`q 11 J ''I .31—1• g �•� ',IS 'tI , 3 c 9� 6UU I.,--1 r I,!a + u ■ 1 N'',�.,'z t;L I'- �I I 1 1 P L,I P'1'r, ; ,. ', .. � � " ,,' gay. 00t; •' i�1�l�i`d1il�,11 o ....F? ?v11.a '+" r-' I:. r;r '.'V 6/'f • tai 'yF '. p�"ti3flr �' `� Itia' .r.'', SA ;. ;wllF4II� i,4,"'001105'AVONfI V111400 U: N d.y ao 1•,�flr��'� 4• j 7. . 5111 • . , , . e,,,,,,,,,,i . ,,,,, t 6iiiik) 4., tw,,„, . ' 4 , ,,, 1 ' . 1 ; , ; i „„,"---'l Y 1„.,t y� ��b 't March 15, 1975 • ,,;, ,, . . ,, -- .:`,;Ii3':4 ' . .1'.tYYd• V .�fN.w�!}i, 4i'!,�;fl'41.XA,,,1'i John R. Sknurtes �,, ' •�. .. Rt. ?. BON 575 H Beaverton, Oregon 97005 !ear .Mr . Sr;;our tes p 4 ; ;;u response to your request hv let :er on March 10, 1978, that `, NI y�our minor land partition be considered concurr� ntly with the design review; the answer is that until a 1r)gal lot exists according to City Code requirements, no desig) review can take place. „....: Your letter ire incorrect in quoting members of my star is sari ins= that concuDrent consideration would be possible. I a. �; ha�.Y�;e !questioned John Laws a,"d Ben Altman regardin ;,heir conversation with you and they emphatically deny making any 4). ° such assurances. . �;. incerelq, i- r m ' Richard Dolen Planning Oir8ctor Y L RB /Pair Y I J , J ,x 4' r r . !^'""i � •'.r., a,.,.. .:�,`"iw',m� +, - lP`.f urc;,. i - ' ■,,, , ) i . . - . .,, 1 ,C .• 1 '0 ii .). AFFIDAVIT OP MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss . City of Tigard ) i I D I I, Bonnie Maztin, being first duly sworn, on oath depose anC, say: - I That Y. am Secretary for the Planning Depaitment for 1 , the City of Tigard, Oregcn 1 That I served notice of hearing of the Tigard Plan- ning Commission 1 - 4 1 of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) lipon each of i the following named persons on the /.5-.4....4 day of 1 . 43946?,,,Le2-4/) , 197,1 , by Mailing to each of them at the 1 - address shown on the attachEA list (Marked Exhibit B) , said notice 10 as hereto attached, deposid in the United States Mail on the , . ...z-`2.6 day of 197S , postage prepaid. ..___ • TT) 0 ! Subscribed and sworn to before me on the 4 3 --Iht de.y of WA --- RCH , __, 197 t?) . . ' , ) ---\ , ............., , , .., . ,,,,ce)441/1 tilitY:C' . ,14 i 1 [ , ,I ti- I CI cie: My 'cioltrisloi2, expires: 1 ,if I .= *a r 1 g II r., r.tv 111 ri 1 , i ' ' iaLitor-a,'s '—`1'-'" , ' — '"*. ""*. ,-77.--1-------------.7%—tr- "..c-- -, 7.----,. .-"" i . -"t,,,,,. - .,.., , .*N.' , •,,, w , ' \ ht* / • 1 0 1 11o1;i, 11444,10 . �, 2'•.14 Q111 'ITS' OF TIGARD �F°Yra . 0 .e '�A„"� P.O. Box 23397 12420 S,W. Main Tigard,Oregon 97223 A' % . Dear Property Ornery The attached map represents a development proposal � hi•ch, due to its location, adjacent t'ti! ,�, d , , due �' property or occupied bv you or due to your pry?vious1.y indicated iuter�est the City feels.w b �7 g e rl 'p' '� � i�1� �A �w I v r Y1.1 �1 Ib •U'�A 1. .f,11�f��1 ��rl.:t� �J�..,A. 1.�C�y.n 1.a, to notify you', The proposed development plans are avathhhie for pelonal review X1/01, Tigard City Hall) and written comments may be submitted f :a. ... for consideration at ary time prior to the date of anticipated final action Eby the planing director . (See map p .i or date of final actions ) �f 1 If you bCLIY'�� any �v�yel st'Lo»,s 7 please do not hesitate to con- . .. tact the City Plan'IEU nt Departmer t, at 639-4171 . Yr rt is h r, A 4, 66 '_.' _....._.,..,_.,__....4..754..„,_...1 ,171-.7._:....,...40 47$P,...._....L...,..___.__:....L.Ni L42._...„..5_1" _____.,.,._„.._.„.._..___H„,+,_ ___:,,,:,,_,_,,,,,„,'.._,,,,,_, ' loo, 5-e;),0 .1,Vo 00 1 .Y.,.....6.....«..,.,w�.. lLQe„w r, ....,. ” "'a e 1 ..x,.0 .<5,.,..r,,.w.a,..�.,.,»<....,....<...-..,»,....,...................�..,..,.�,....,...� ,.,.....+w.„��,.._—.wa,,. ..-.a.a...... .,...w....:.�.«..�<..Wa.,.w.._ .,......,,......,�.,,...,�-..�,....,:..,....«�a.�www,.w..,.... ...»,-,-,.....«k�........w�...,.<.,t..,.r.._,..,.._,.,..,,.,a,w�-„�..,....,.,.�,.x,,.-.,-....d ia�>.-.,�. µ� 1 ,..w,w,.--.,,�,.,,,,.......w...,-a.« ., .,..,.,<....-. ,........,,, - „....,_.,,..-,.T...,_w.w.,.,,.. ... .�-«a.w..,...-....._.«,.....»a.............,,.r<.w...«a.=,_.,....,.w.....,,<,.,w,.,.�.,..,,..,,.,_.,..._ .,,�,-..�.x..,...d w ..,<.......,.,.-,..�,.. w-:..-�,,.,..,,., ., •--_-�, ,,.. ,-._.�.............. � C J. 1 • s 1 • . • 1 1 m , , .,.r,,,.�.�. .:,.,.. ..,.._. ._,.,. ,.,,.,.. . ., ;.. ..,.._ .. ,r„ ...... , ,„ . . , , ,..,.•r ,._,»,...,.��,,,, ..».,�. ,_. .... ,. ...,�..... <..,.n.,._,�..,. Y ...,_,,w rw,,,. ,»».....»an.., . .,,�,,..� .,»�a,w,_,,... .�._:,..,,.�.„<, .�w w. „�.,.� .,�, .»., ., ,. ,rb, ......',_. .< .., w, .. . . . , ,. . , . . sh>a.- <ni. ..tu n>-..aw-v,......�vv —_...Y,,.•+a'e w.ru....�<_.+.wx u.....h,a.,na.,m..K:+r,e.a-4r.,... ♦,. .s,uN M,-M,,.I+Nnn,.-��4,.nwu..x.wa u,r�+r..r.m.-.ar,,..aa'.=a., -wu..uw...w.»w,ur.r vnv,.,-tt.nwr,..,..+,w.,.0.r,v r, ,.ar , ..w.0 , .,r,,,..,_. ,.r,a o-u.,.0 ,,.r --- < + „, ,;. bi ” National Safety Company „, Rt, Box 575 H Oregon 97005 Mar 1978 RECEIVED NII-A 1 3 1978 CM( OF TIGARD Mr. Richard Bolen Planning Directoe' City of Tigard F. C. Lox 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 • SUBJECT: PROCESS BUILDING PERMIT FOR 10,200 SQ.FT. WP1,.EHOWE t.4 TAX MAP 2 112A TAX LOT 4000 Dear Mr. Bolen: After talking to your staff this vvek t is our understanding that minor land petitioning and Pite plan review are compatible and can be reviewed simuJ„tanecusly if authorized b,-1, the depart- : ment head. • Therefore, we respectfully ark you to aocomodate us so we can expeditiously receive a buildinf, permit. Our plans and documentations as submitted to your staff, incorp- orate certain ideas furnished us last May 1977 by hick DLaiels . We have ' aid the $300. 00 minov land petitioning fee unde: protest. 4fr Our position on the necessity of mino:L" land petitioning is noted in our letter to Mr. John Laws , dated March 3, 1978 and is summarized below: City miner land petitioning should not apply over railroad right of WRfr land. Because it is part of the interstate railroad system. Therefore, supersedes a city mincr land petitioning ordinance. Being assured that the above is correct, the railroad does not have to ask permission to a city before it can sell part of its right of way. Therefore . the minor le,,nd petitioning process for this site is unnecessary. As noted above a tax lot has been 11 assigned by the county when ownership changed. 0 Your assistance is appreciated. Sincerely \O tt. 4 N, Johfi R. 'skourtes President JR'S , 4 -,--"a--%; ' et . IP:' _'� Mar 4,1 8, 1978 � d , ,. r,.. Mrs b John R . Sources � .. National Safety Company • , _, ; Rt. 1, l3cx 5758 'a. Beavortot s OR 97005 • '�� o �,.� � � t ;' Deg a ' Sit ',;,� We are i;, receipt �( your check and application for a Minor , Laud Partitlan . Your application will be processed within 80 e, ,o'^.k, When it has been doter mined that you have a legal, buildable lot, �t� �, you ill allowed to submit your appl .oa•*ton. for Design Revived °, ?*: o This process will be accomp isftc d at the Staff levee within 30 ,�, days following vcc eipt of p2 :.ns whio'�a meet all rsub .aasi ioa ,xi .. code re ,u:Z, ement I. "lease re iza that owl staff .s limited and that many �pplicat ions I are r1 t� action.rv��y,�r1� �y ,�.y will"� ,�u�, our y� +�,�+� serve�!y, ph y� +{�c�1 a �y r� �+p •�' ''�� �G re p pending �rc.nJ• ✓rka'A.T r� o I.d,+l.ib. L,'Jo \.Iur be to hJ i4. �e yo V4 ,4 n a IJa�F':+ t."TA;� .d"" able amount of time; however,= it is the City's s policy to pr.v,,ce,ss ,;',,rl A.ppJ cations on a first-come first-served basis, tout avoiding A is r profe�.ential i i tmeat. 0 i 3Vr ,r �.�� We look forward to an : m abl:; , working relationship with ;,u. eltYours truly, IIIAl d,a e� N. Rovard r. f;, A n .Ais- gati `e Assistant .. 11,,,,,,. s l p OPN i''' ro, atj I .i + wn i.4 ...._. ..mmsmp: -,-,,---..-- a v1r«mOi.x tlY,l rdx'7("n.sr-- ', ,_, ,.l ., rd . 1111 .4 4' 1i ,0 4 til RECEIVED MAR - 8 1978 MINOR LAND PARTITION APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD i City File e No. ki of Tigard ...., fa :i2420 S W. Main Street Fee 0 0 Tigard, Oregon Receipt by / "-i-Z2-_ ___ 639-4171 Date --. - 4, zej ....,....,... . ........... ..--.__-....__._--.—___—._--___?__,-. ___—....*.......m......sm......www.WNW MOM.1.1...ow............*.s........,...asAawnmumwm. STREET LOCATION I.......L ilv....n 1....4.waLowiworaLrowlsout.. ...................,.. .........■ft,...ow/now...4..1 TAX MAP —2_ (*) B1 A TAX LOT(S) ti (,)Q k. AREA OF TAX LOT(S) APPLICANT 112,0)ie-' .._1,11 PHONE 32_ OWNER it'fin-____ 54 le ( ) PHONE ___ 2232,. , , ........_... me...........,................"M..n.ewo..s*r.,nio...........ns...ws*rwv.o....wu STGNATURE -IT 'ti, vi.": PLANNER f , ENGINEER SURVEYOR ____ --.._ _.....—____—•.---_____---.....---___ .......--...----- -------------__-ry ,Movowie.......■11.1.001*•■•••■.■■•■•■•••■ IOMOIMOIMM. . LAND PROGRAM ■ 0- NUMBER OF LOTS TO BE PARTITIONEn 49,71,"),, __-- ,.,.- 1,4 ir • APPROXIMATE AREA Or EACH LOT oak r it,) -40,) 1.9 If i ZONING DISTRICT . ■,..1.11M.....Mwom.“......**4........................■ryuwo..acRwgo•••s•uo•rll.r.. .m.w.m....+.*......Ait lon..**.it.....................men,airoonn.a......•■•■•morwlumowwe LIST UTILITY DISTRICT PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN FIBE DISTRICT ; . SCHOOL DISTRICT ti 6 A fl u wATE R DISTRICT 2IL(L4P2 4 % SEWER DISTRICT ti Ail_Li F9 1 , LLST ALL EASMENTS AFPEOTING THE PROPERTY: ,.. ; Srly , : i '0r;J�y9i...r. f 1 rte. n �,,. p, • fff���lr,/ .. , 0. V - y'�r""_ G� J�, ♦11 'f-e4".` 'r1�'2. ��f gyp. � c•/,.. �. ‘,.„ „e4.1,..4.,..,,, 4. , ,/„2,, ,, i ,,.4., .'(..,. .' ! .... '',.. '.._,-. - „„„-._.-,. .....,..,_,',.„, ....,4121,-,.al7'.›':t.:'.:4,4-44.14,,,'.,o ' dt) 0-1.-Ad„7,14e44,,e-.- ,.,,.-,, 0---...,„,:,,t_f_;,e2',4t4,,,Cre,..ekli,.,Q).....-.4,...:45z,,r.„..,„: , ..,r • , . :...ee,..›,...-• a . ,,e-..4 n r �, e d S e p / / ..I. 'u.+ .„. . te'. —'61..,;y,'........e:._.,• ... ,......44f.-.‘, d.V,•.f.,,C.OL..,.. de.,,tre .,.1.1::-.4(21"-1.- ,.,,,,,a'. -44:e4,. ',!"14-'14,,, 1./....,:;;;,7,, ,....e,412,14.:',1%,•"' * ,,,e2 ''''''' . ' - ' ' ' a'ex'''1:914*''?"e+C-4,'' ' 1 e: ...... p „. 1,,. • •'' ' ,..._,„ „._,„.,_..,..,,,...,.._____., .,,,,,,.4,"?.?1,11,,..,1,ff.,..,.......:.,,•:'.6.1i7Z4,.ge-AC'Y ii*tbeiP7,Lel.-6. ..,‘..4,!...-.'' ,,,,444e,..........7t. ..„ .....1,!•::;--.4'7-.4;._ .44,1.:)0414,1';',,,.. .r . ... . .1,' „..„_....,..',..„.1.',...,...... '''', . • `°` N.. �' C' sr .4 "i I !.% " .... ..,,,,,..„.._,.....„, ,.:„_„..,.u-�"" N!..✓ ,��� d/�, :�' _ �. , «y 4rnA: ,..:> r �r 4 • F!G' 6 _ . . . ry `''1 r ,. F , " ' 4 � ` t r , .'.« :.. .._LL.-...._.._._,:_,,..al...' .,.= z4,t,,, L 4 � . -v . / ,e6C '0 , ".45.' 'J .. + Gy',:,°:.l1y "; y%i"-t , . of .,, _ ....... ,_ ,I,,.,.k"✓C7,' ✓�,d'7,';'"i+' '%'�i.!r{�i. ,_ 14I'" '�,"C,iZe.-11 .,o ;4'1, .L+�r"..1 z ...4..:,•.16.;-,_ "N"•r,4,L.!.. ,.,,r I4 �.,...,.,,,1..,:e„.,,,,,z.4_. , , 4e- r , 1,„„c. y - ee .,,.+%i µ,n I ,$r'r� 44. "4 , Y �^' y +N?� }, !�,��J�rL „� -"." tI WMY�4- -4.14'4 , ' r �,., , . r ,,„�- M . 0n,n y r .,.,,,,._.,._ ',,,, ,', ,...,..„.,;—,',.' '.''1,,,`..r:1/4-4,_3:it' '''„Z-e-t--...,. .,,,17— '. k...4., . ,4,4,,t,..„0...,. ,,,--0,4-,pe,, ?:::„ „,,e47:-,, ..,.-41,44,- , .‘A.-V-L.....,:"AZ. ..,.44,--te;e'/1-.-4)..r.2.,eeceeevg,,, . ' , i ;,,,i�: ?q t'• G Z �e-jJk.., .1 '7.-e !1%. �r"'�i ,G')74,e” •'�� y :r,A�fjyl ...- J„ � � � 1 it , ' ' ' ' 'f)'7-e."2,Q.,---.4-,-z.., . ' , -...A41.: ,04,-,1444 / '' ', ‘. .,,, ,,.._.,.„. . .,,,.... .. „ _....,,_ ,,,,_„.,..., ..,_ ,..,_____,,N40., , ,,,,,,.. .,....cre,,,e.,:e4,.. --41,;.,..; .,,,i,/ .,',.. A. ,./.4-‘4.6- - og),...led.,,e.. ,,,,i.,.,„.' . I '0.4,07.7 ,', , ; . , G •. i. ���r.,,.... .„_.: . _.,.. . ,.. _., ,,,e'',./e, f,. ..,?ee.....-t'v,,, .Le„,'',sr"A''' ...,..,0,,e,ofrt,,,,,C,„_'....._".,,,f,'' 6'1.'. ',/..e-4----".1,...--,-1- U'r,4,. .,,, .e4,?,,e,..' 'A, :,..e-t-(2.,.e' ,..y.,,Le. ,d, ....4,:en,.. ,off,;44?e;„1,- ,,4:1-, ,./11.,,, ,e,"..„1,0,,,,e , , , , 1. '- a .M �e Iry r �� ��.�. � _ .,,, �r .. .... 'P'.Y+JI. nwibn..."a".rurvnai+m•S'.+q�•e .M7.... `s•MW,.r"�,r's� ......,, r .. ,' .'., r , r .. e4:' n ,, l en lk e National Safety Co. ti Rte 1 Box 575N Beaverton, Oregon 97005 March 6, 1978 4 Miss Nancy Edwards 1*o Community Design Planner fe,'\( ?' City of Tigard '. Tigard, Oregon / Ron New warehouse building, 261 12A,, tax lot 4000. Dear Nancy, . . , Enclosed copy of letter from PUC Commission in Salem reference III driveway to warehouse site. To expedite matters x am enclosing site plan review application. The City Building Department as a accommodation to me will review the plans ,• in one day Let me again ask you to expedite this application because of time commitments on footings and concrete work beyond my control. Your cooperation in rushing. :thi s chrough will be appreciated, , Sincerely, " , Th4L42C t ohn R. Skouartts • C.C, Richard 501 en 2 E.nc1 s i _�,,,,',......,,,�..«—.-.�.._ ry.nK•wed...Nwrsw,w.as,'we,n _ .:', ..., . , • , .. tfe nm _ x.rl.p Fx_ i ti_Ilrw •.y-r '"Y"llsYnW3: i rAFww,nM.MYw.➢.'/,+^'•'.^I:w.Wi.'rnwwwy.�we � 'N'^°` Y++r++.«. %1_ _ n .... V i .. r ,,�. _ � .tip. ,,,,, I . ,, 1 ,„ .. , , ,,: Public Utility Commissioner of Oregon • tr ROBERT W.s'rrtaua LA3OR 111®�iSTRIE!3 BUILDING, SALEM 97310 PHONE (503) 378- 6660 . GpVERNGiR a March 2, 1978 , ft—VcoveD Mr. John R. Skourtes a 9: Route 1, Box 575H rt� ��� Beaverton, OR 97005 �`�� Please refer to your letter received March 1, 1978 concerning your desire to construct a driveway entrance to property located between the grade crossings at Bonita Road of the Southern n Paci i 'Transportation Company and Burlington Northern, Inc. N PU3(! staff has rir objection to the construction of said . driveway provid d a "°i .. „f t .?gn 4 . . '' • on the south approach to Eonita Road. It is our ii i az1 ,irg"E1 said sf f wIIr` "' installed before f • iltny vehicular traffic makes use of said new roadway. ,, , S h oul? the n a t u r e a�the...u� .z ,. . .ath .th� .+.��,..r� \ ....f a e P Public Commissioner has the ,' f right and obligation to insure the safety of the motoring public using said driveway. Roger P. Campbell ' a Administrator Rail Rate and service Division ,`' ra/0694 !'it- II y ,) a d, 1' • COS'X,76:bd0(1)The obrnm tlner. " r p, ouw�orrier t any public Utility,�'ali��� air ca,+r1er or, carrier,and., , he issi � , ;�hai! rb resent the �� 111t ,� 7�d btor c shall make use of the Jurisdiction and power of his office to prtytent such customers,and the public generally,from unjust and unreasonable exactions and pra ctices'and to obtain for them adequate service at fair bad reasonable rtes," _ _ 4 4•. , 4 '^"`m+,mmxtknhcrn,es*rcauncra --0,---- ,�:.:.,.vn,s:-,•..cwn.n•c.,na.u-..,,...s.— a..wr,� cl II A c,,,0 9e,,.; 2....,,,,. , t . ,.$ , . • , F R CEI D // ' AR -3 1978 :4, • ( 1 Rt. 1.,$ Scut 575 H ,. Beaverton', Oregon 97005 Ma r oh :3, 19 78• r, • Mr. john Lews�•Associ ate Plannr.r ��" ��"`�, . P.O. Box 23397 'a Tigard, Oregon 57223 Reference - Tax Map 25 112A Talc tot 4,000 Dar Mx . Laws: We have submitted ;"rau: Pr cis of plans for design review approval' on February 28, 1973 for tha spe ii to purpose of building a 10,200 eq. ft. A• warehouse . • . Property is correctly zc�ncd Public services are avai1a. ie 30' road sc+07ess - plus approval P.L.,•, . Cora . .sa"on Lot U•Lil4etir n and set becks it order 1.31 acres . Tax lot 40000 was railroad right-'of.wayr property undex the direct jurisdiction of the State of Oregon. �. 1Washington Co. ,nty and City of ".�iga.rd. bAe no jur1;:w�;ictw,r'n over said parcel. All parcels is tnd, r city jur1sd ,ci.:i:oxa had tax i.,—t designations. The City of T.:,7ord Minor Land' LJettt on°ing Ordine :e can not apply to a parcel that was lot under its Ju'-.L diotion. b , war ; rare. creat4".1icpa,,n' w" Grcel not splitting p s parcel that was under . .M..�.......w...t..+..6W' ypWww.rw arw.wwrr.waew the jurisdiction of the :c,ni.;.ity end city. =r� parcel. in ousstion was reviewed by Acting City Mennger, atd '4,ca1den, in ' ., December r x.977 and he agreed with the above conclusion. '4 'therefore there is no l.a, a ,,la as a that would rt:,! a r e us to waste trine ti' and"., mcgle - 3a t ru Minor Lend :Petitioning ng prcO e be.fol n we,,can .- e : .nw-..,Mn .........a . ....-.. • recei., a..:building permit. y p: r,.�ent�»-, sly, I ''''Al. John . S'.our:t o:.s p president 1,, Oopyi City Mateger - Tigard $ Oregon , ;2!,,,,#7,„otver0104.--d'efr-A, O ,,, .., ,,,,,,,04,„41--....... „,,,o.,,,,,,,, ....,,Ad. ;;:f. -r*--t S3''''' er 4 r . - • .-. '. .rw»'ilr ,r. ..a..,.+,: �s..u.,.,.' ..,...w..yr•a.nwww.v+..+.�.,...w._vr«...w -. _ ,`.'^.' . -_" ....-.+.wr..um.w.+w•... ,' . , . ■ . . . . , . . , . . , , . . . . , . „ , . . , . . . , . , . . . . . . . . .. , . . , . ,, • . , -"Ist.-.-42111111001C ' . , l'..,• ' , . , , : ''' ' ,;•:' •• 1,•;; . ' , ''''.! .,,,e, ,o ',',..:.;•,%,_. ...1..,,,,. . ,, .. .„0,4440----, . 400.. ,,,,. ,„ .,... . , . -.•, _ .,,,, . , ,,, .4 . ,41,""I'Mum2410!.tr',46-1013fteratanatam., V , .. • , . ., .. ,• . .. . ' . i , r;,:,,,,r-r•' . ■•''' .'01040001Mati, b. . ,.. „ , . . „.,• . • .„. • .• 40060416- .. , .. \\ ' 1 . . 400100040tese, . . . .• , . . . \i • v 1, I: A , ■ . ' ,e$,' 2 ,", ,,ez '''• fi t , tl, S. 4 I ./.:7' ' ''''' ' ' le:;;; 4'*ee '' . ' i;• . , ti '''* 1 ,, .. „., .,,.. .. . ., .. . ; , • , ,,,,ozarermionvoy d . 01 . . . . ( . ' Oil. , . ., . 1 • , . , . . . " . ..,..,. ... , . . .r• .;,'''.- • V. , , , , ... ,. . . .., . 01, ,•. - - . ' '40002t.,,,,e . , . .. ,... , . . . . . . . , . . . , . , . , '4lie ,... . , . .. . . . . .. , . , .,.,''','' '' ', W .,' L , ' I , ,;:.''''''' ' ' '.4-',.:.•-', ,,, :;',;•''''',, ' or.- . , ., . , ..,...•,, :,.,,,-;'•;',''''''' '- ,. . .. .,..„ . .•'" . .. . '• .., •• . :i ••C'.°164e '. • , - - ,.•,.... ' ,' '-:, . .. .„ . ,. , .,. . , „..., ... .. . l' • . ., , ..■ i . ..,.. ., . , . .: . . ...„. . . . ., . . . .,,,,,,:, . , :,......_„,,...„ .„,.. ., ... , ......„...,:" .H. .. : .... .. „.. .s . . , . ,„ . ., .. . .,. . , ... . . ., . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...4,., 1 \ . , , ,,, . „. . . . . ..., .'. . . . „............. . . . . ,. , . . .':' ,. .. . .. . ,.. ,,. . . , . .i. . . . , . • .._ ,• y. 4 i Neianal Safety Company Rt. l, Box 575 H Beaverton, .)regon 97005 March 3, l9iB Mr. John Laws-Associate Pler;ner P.O. Box 23397 y. Tigard, Oregon 97223 ilReference - Tax Map 23 113@ Tax Lot 4,000 ii Dear Mr, Laws: We have submitted four sets of plans fo: design review approval on II ."�....uory 23, 1978 for the specific purpose of building a 10,200 sq. ft. warehouse. v Property Is correctly zc ned Public cervices are available 30' roa3 access -• plus approval P.0.0. Cormisi'.on Lot a+.iilisation and set backs In order 1.31 sexes Teo.. lot 40000 was railro,e l right-of-way prouerty unc ar the di;:ect iurisd c;cion of the State of Oregon. Weshira Eton Cot ity .1nd City of Tigard had no jurisdiction over said parcel. All par:„Ials under city jurisdiction hood tax lot designations. q The City of. Tigard M ,nor Lend petitioning Ordinance can not apply to a parcel that was not under its jurisdiction. 'U' j We are cry iia a apa °warcal not splitting 1.71.. a parcel that was under the jurisdiction of the county and city. a Pe ct3l in ± uestion was reviewed by A,.:•;:,.thg City Manager, Sd Wa:Lde:n, in �. n December 1S.'7 7 and he screed with ':he above conclusion. The.rfcre there is no legCi bay's that would require us to wa 'ate �:�,me 0 ., and money going thxu Minor Land Petitioning procedure before we can receive a building permit. Sincerely, ', \„, r q i -r, - ' l' ► John R. Skourtes President Copy*, City Manager , Tigard 3 Oregon iCI OF TIGARRca a g . +. mo mSm s a y w w ... r:I Ili. :iii :•'; Ik . 't� 5' yt' L Il, I t}I • �" ' 'i, a =x ..... •- u u _.,IM, m �^ ,. „ a x . . •l l.,„. ...„ } -; r : Ir :g6b�`o'.'"d�4.►lr�t,:� <. ..._...,r..,.„, ,•_......,_.�,..,._,_.._ ��,_._..., .r.- 0 ,"y� o • r ' a . 1 w ° ✓e..:. g: i „.. -.. ,„-' . .-,...v„_ r � ir• ,{,1 P I '♦ N—,—>4 = eV 21e .rCrtr.wa ,�,P•+„+4.e ..14,"•4 . s"S _;".<e . • =%,i '" `1 °;' _•„_�.�,,, "° 'd! i . ..,. '� ,, , _, ._.._. .,` „A' 14t „Mtt0t...,,. ^".4.°' .,;. .. , ..r<.. _ ,ru.,.__.. _,�. .,. , ' 4,•',,,t,ya,., ..,.a _. epi�. . �*-1,-,,,,,4.419 � �� . c 494 41.,1,1,72,,d' "it't,,,” .,,,,,,.,,w -. w r.• , '�►...�/'y�',",�f w %1 I g, .� ...._..,_A",^`�-4'°` _. ,,,. ,,_-tl p "..gym!-.-sl!�,�!:ter,4.r'fl.14.�L,r./!'tf'r..f : ..••. ,'�„ _`•', r'"le*(_.- -,—fir..',..�e.,1 . .—,,., . ,.-.,.. +t 1 RI r'"=--,•A'.„�.f„+- v � W' . • ... 4 e,0,. M ° , �3 .��,,,,,. rlp --y'�..•�.�.�-»•l'i' 714'''' Ae. `f r� V ,, 1 1}114��ua�-•s,--w.,sw,�.a 1.r„_.._ •..aa_,.,,,_ .,,a.____„ .,-.,�.0 ....a,,. �,1- _ .. ..,.. .... , .,u . - ..,_ , a, . .,,,,, ., ,, :., -, ..,. L L ...,...,+,,,..,,,«.«..r x„e«.r....,.�,,,-w�.__...�.,.w.,. ..,...,.,....•,..,.,,.-,.e. ..•..,,.., ,.. �„,. ,_ _ t.r�+e/ 0 .... ,,� ., V .., _. .. ,.. .. ,,.:, f.� •��t. ii' `'i 4 I,, v 1 1 1 ..,«.,. ..>. _.,,_ __.,, - 'i, • •,W II • i r, i. :- ,w, ,” ,.. '.,.+.•� ,�I+�'.ttF,.r,�•,`, �. _.7��T�"'+�t,}nuN;7'+uRnm.clR'" t ,7"7"I *�• " 1` �''� I 1 f .. 1•w y 1, ■ /-12/ .,7e,:/t,e')/ f;C/te 5/3/7 S7 !s ,` 06,99 . W. 1. t 21.G fin.. - (.4",:i0„,-ei CA..eae)n- , a ,(4.0. ,.....:C4-C-- . _ _ ... 7/ ' +. ■ j� A� l 7 r '`f!1. �it Ip ;.�._.,�- _�- ✓ �:.J. ,-�!"C,.^•., e.2-... C.? ... A Z 4r"vl; . ` r� J " Il r � ' q" ..(-(7\-. * . 81,,, • / )tileeli:66,18-01/Vi'VC 671- . 61,0 d.,71;31.,de"Aely,U716, - . ,k eir Y a ii. 1'1• .., _ r .2t ,v 4z%i ....,/, r„:2-V �'G s^s « ' ,5' ct,P, .t. , i','i i.✓ r'l!!"", "bc.....�}±;.�err ,„frl� ✓J4'��,/,... , ,,�.".�.A-e— ',� ,e-deet �''�'e4Q'C1�.+G" ,(J,._.2!G" '��/.-!'� .,''Z.,' t"i./4ed,4"C 'e {4'' �'' � r ,„ , ,, • i, „. .,, .. .., a , m ,1I, ' I. ,a . 4 , 1 !iy '1.1,k d h. b , g a�--'- 1� ' d \. ..`a1. --+r' '.-r,'..r MNw':u+t•^'a �.y 1 w 1 r;yw—r...s l Y i..; �- ���..++ � "'r S"y„,,,�,fT t,_ � 1 j t 4..--'t` '1 j.'. , • ,,,''. ,, t, 1.1,41%.■ f'S...,• *, '■. ,' ' ': ''■O '' , + 7o.+ • , , f eq, watrona I NT.' ' lik 016 1 7 OF i ic4.,17 ', '' . *OF —.H., . „... ....„„ P.O. Box 23397 12420 S.W. Main '0 Tigard,Oregon 97223 . .4 4- , . .., • March 2, 1978 " 0 !, - •11, ' •' rt.,■ • l'il '• . •.■ , ' ,I John Skourtes 'V 7530 SE Foster Road 64 .,., , Portland, Oregon 97206 Dear Mr. Skourtes: , , ,.. ', .. Please be advised that this department cannot accept your application for design review until such a time as your proposed site is a legal lot as per Title 17 of the Tigard. Municipal Code. , , ..7. t.. I am enclosing a mi' or land partition application and the relevant portion of the Tigfird Municipal Code. .i. ,•,ii , ■' John Laws, Associate Planner, will be the staff member handling this application. I would recommend that an , ••• .r., appointment be made with him at your convenience 7oure truly, . ... / . .. ,:., .. Nancy Edwards f•., 1 Community Design Planner Nt/Pjr , ' 4t , Enclo3Ure .! „?, •• .. ' „,,,,,., • 4 .i. .4. 4....... ---,NA,.4,',,”.,,, ,+,, ' ,.:1 iN'''',,■ ',," ' ' 1 , . 1,... ' *.,,, , ., M' x ' , 1 - • , . PUC Docket No SXF "; PUC Crossing No. FD-749.70 f: s: DOT-AA,R Crossing No 749 197 � F. �x ; ; BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONER OF OREGON • ;y .,,r: APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY in connec ,,':,:r tion with th a proposed grade crossing ;;, ;it; si nalization pro,'e; L__ Formal Title" `: ' ' In the matter of the application of State o-F, Orggon b and ,hrou h 7 is „�•..�,.. `l (-name of applicant) .Ar , ' ClepLrtment of Transporta,tioff,,, Highway Division __,._ r.: %, . for the authority. pursuant to ORS 763.030, to alter a grade crossing of S.W. Bonita Road ___ __ _ ,:../-,:,T (iiame of C-',treet or h7 ghway) ._.__,. and the tracks and right-of-way of Southern Paci f7 fi r,-Trans orta ti can Co n (game of rail-oad cr,mpan , , Tillamook Branch near rTtc and _' '' ame of branch or main line et her track yeT in/ne /aEF - city. town ii ': ',A,,' ,.........�.....�.._..„ Washington l ngton _ C�ount,y, Oregon, ,,•r: ; or'�nearestRation) dame of ;ountyY by installing or modifying signal devices. u: $,,,„,;1' 4 1�. ' Form AS-1/75 �`. ..'s': Title Page ";, • t- , w --- - '�-,, \ �iui avr raw 4 ,wn+am e Yaea'ss�s ra 6 ...,N jr r A 1•+5+ " riN,q `,.,, .'.,;' i 4 t, • . . ._ ,, ■ . . '''', , • ...: • .. ,. . Check one of the following: i. Allocation of funds from one of the following sources is requested or expected-- .., e., ' Stato grade crossing protection fund ..,'.• Estimate of dollar cost to fund: $3,270 „., ,., • . ei Federal-Aid Highway System Funds.* .4 Section 203, 1973 Federal Highway Safety Act Other Federal Funds, such as "Safer Roads Demonstration Prugram" funds.* ' •' e ' .. None of above. '' . *If Federal Fund assistance is expected, please give appropriate I t. )......17 federal statutory provision. 0' ' ., :°“' ' FORO SELECTION Please answer each of the following questions:. • ,. ;,,..,. . 1. Does the contemplated project involve construction of a new or relocated crossing? NO If yes, please use form AX-1/76 instead of this form. . , ■,,t■4 -'7.- .1'. 2. Does the contemplated project involve any physical alteration of the crossing beyond normal maintenance or surface reneal (such as realignment , e 1, 4, t, ., of approaches, widening of the roadway, change in approach gradients, etc. ) ,e NO . • c•- (yes/nor .1 0 If yes, please use 'form AX-l/73 instead of this form, 3. Does the contemplated projeci; involve more than the additien or deletion of ,g ) stop sign protection at the crossing? . . - . e., (Yes/66T- ..11, ,., If no simplified form SS-1/7S may be used instead of this form. Form AS-1/76 ;'..., Page 1 .. ,.:" 1re4,-7-7,, ,� p. ; .1 , �,} ,� . rt '','.'1. I. Name of Applicant: De Oregon partment of Transpgrta Hi ohW -i v ,3 yi,r Address: Highway Building, Salem OR Y7310 :`• ._. — z---- ,-...._:310 _,._..�.._.. _ " , 2. Location of the proposed project: ' Railroad read milepost 1 epo at 749 70 City ___ Nearer;t ra i 1 ro,ld station Ti gara ;s : County Washington 4 tN•, .',` 3. Name of public highway involved in this project:: '.;'' ,,,, S.W. Bonita Road Name of public authority with jurisdiction over this highway: hin ton Count 4. Name of railroad involved in this project: Southern pacific Transportation , '`Companv, Ti l l amook ranch . include name .of branch, main line or other track) ° .i n'` the proper parties of interest in this matter: 4 a. Southern Pacific Trar),pc;'otcciinn__C.Q1flpamy ___________ 8?k b. Washi naton,CountV' vtt h . 0^egcn Dear anent f Tk( ��yyy�^-y! a�,7 11 .r� (�� ,A, 1 '1,ti ran o.�+�..h.�'.�. .Y tg y �NwY c4...—...,, ....�..r...w.... 1 d Burlington Northern, Inc ,„� it Federal 1 Highway Administration, 477 Cowwt a e t + H,E+_..r i . Salem,...DR_.91, 1 .r�_ 4 y f "ity of Tigard ;' `' Have you served each of these parties with th a copy of this s application? '',:, NO l,i l-/rye ;. ,' tr t4,a If yes, please provide certificate of sw h service. (We would prefer to 4-1 4; serve the application ourselves.) '' +.ui p i .k A i . :, Fort AS-1/75 pack a' h. :' S NA .r� , , .. ' ,:Mi x ,aae ---.1.7”' ma?'"a``' i.rr"I bra mvrx'N+ 7' .. L ,,"*I J µ , N 4 f ''.e.'i ‹. 7ir , gi 6. Describe the project, including a listing of the devices to be removee, ,.,. , ...- those to be installed and their prop9sed locatioo, . .,, . Install #2 Flashing Lights and #4 Autmatic Gates on both sides of _______ . , f / crossing. These signals to be interconnected with similar installation ______------ by Burlington Northern at Crossing No. 3E-033,50 adjacent. 1 ,... __ ....... ......f ........1.0.........* 'I ::.1: ........................ ......................w.W**....W...,* .,.*.,* .. ...,,,,.a.. * !, l■ 17', . t . ) .. . ' .4. , 0,• ., :. 4 1 , ' 7. Is the project contemplated required by the public safety, necessity, convenience and general welfare? Yes ,y., —TiesTITET— t,, . If yes, why? To more adequately warn the motoring public of impendin _train , ., .., movement at the grade crossing. .4., ,, ,1.:4 ------...-----..... ■n......r•ao.......wo,....**yw........1■*o.......n.............II, . .....* . *4 , . 4 1...............................................*...woo......... ............................................................an r...H ............................, ..,..............,.............................*,.... , '• 01'• ,,,, tL Is it possible or practical to construct a separated crossing at this ) 1 ocati on? No _.....,_ (yes/no) -... , . 1.1 ..,..: , If no, why not? Lack of necessary funds. - ,. . .- ,,.. ..‘ .- , ...........-_ . . , ,i.,'• 4,' 4,1,''■ 1 '''' ',.. •' r L'. ' 4\ *h Form AS-1/75 Page 3 ti4 . - :‘ ..,'Iliee' ,., "—"77", , i' .. ' t797-", : 7 : .-`-'71-777 1 --- • ,'.n', it r. rJt w d,M l . 90 Foysical description of thl: crossing: . , a. The Highway , (1 ) Width-_- The highway is _ 22 feet wide at he crossing and and consists of (from N to S ) C:,ti,,., NorE SorW ft, A should ;r (or parking area) of 2 feet a° ., 2 lane(s) of travel :�f 9 feet (each) I A center median of _ .. —..: y� feet lane(s) of travel of ' --- feet (each) A shoulder (or parking area) of 2 feet Explanation, if necessary �..� `,;:.o jb t'u 7 (2) Surface--- At present: After Completion ;`, ,it i type of surface on traveled way: .' 4 V' on approaches Asphalt Sane t"' P at crossing Sectional Timber Same _ Type of surface on . ;,���,o shoulders Gravel Same ** '.+1 Condition of surface: ■ ■ . Fair Same A on approaches ...__.. _ w:; at crossing Good Same rN 0;,. Is the highway curbed <<�:� ''4�'; on the approaches? No � No ___ � .:. ��''J IL Note: No portion of any ?;ost attri ly±tabl e to upgrading the su rfar:e -,` of the road at lhL crossing, including cost of rail renewal , ;. comprOmise joints, otc. may be allocated to the State Grade ,• Crossing Protection Account. . ..: j Form AS-1/75 i, Page 4 ) i k + �"'a f. .. r. r "~ iP7.„ rr,'- r y pm .:'!-I ,'t r , .A1 - -- - ' •' ?, '•. •'.! ',.. •: • IF' • . '' .., ,, • i ..t4 . ''''' • (3) Nearest public roadway intersection on each appruach--- (a) E approach: IELft; ADT 2,500 1.. . ,t (b) w -- approach: Lap_ft; ADT _1 (N/s/I77 5.0 H Name of road or highway: '..., q, (a) S.W. 72nd Avenue . . .:.., , ______ ,■4 ? ' 4: ,, (b) S.W. 74th Avenue ., _____ 1.-.' ..:;' Public autho'Aty with jurisdiction over road (1r highway: , ,., ..; , .1:.. . (a) Washigton County ....... ______ . . ,., ('b) City of Tigard ,.. :.'... ,r • (If different public authority than that with jurisdiction over ., , road at crossing, please add name to list of parties of interest . . in this matter--see item b of this application form. ) , ‘ '... - Are traffic slgnals (to be ) installed at either of those intersections? ,..1 (a) No ; .(b) No " (yes/nC51. -ciiiiwor ,. . If yes to either, please explain below which intersection(s) is (are) f.' h." (to be) signalized, and whether or not this signalization is (to be) ,...... .--; t, v, .... interconnected with track circuitry on the railroad, If it is, are ;.... .A r' ■ ..' part-time turn restriction rzigns (to be) installed? (If there is to '.',. '47 41/41 be interconnected circuitry, please include the interconnection and .1 4.., part-time turn restriction signs of protection propose , ....e ns as it f rttio d ,. ;,.4. ... 4e herein. If traffic signals at the adjacent intersection are to be k installed in connection with this project and if costs of same are to , ,., be partially borwi by the railroad aod/or the state grade crossing .: . protection account, they should aho be listed under item 12 herein. ) . . bi or.,.1.., ....1 . . , ..,:, Form AS-1/75 7.....,, “,j, ,,,,, 7,,,T,,,...--r,,,,,,,,,.-:-ic,rr7tiTr-.--.7r-----r, -7,„. . ,,k, , g, . ,, 0',,, .N.., ' ',1\4,,,,I,. :,,,,. , , ,,,,,i 6,, ,, -0,■----:-.4----,444, , .,i r.., .• , t ,.■ .. • P 1 • 'VS ;, •,...' , ,,: • A 4 i'h . 1 V Oa,' (4) Describe how the crcssing is now protectod. (For example: , .. .. .,.; 2 crossbucks, 2 stop signs, 2 advance warning signs. ) Also, please g ' , . indicate which, if any, of the existing items of protection will remain in place after completion of this project: , . N y 2 StopsSigns, advance warning signs Stqp_signs to bellemaKed. I I ■ "r,.., /A ,.',',: ........ ....0....*•■•.,,ima ,............., ......................*,..................*...... '4'4./ ....... P I............... ,..,........................ b. The Railroad k. (1) Tracks-- ,.: ..,.‘..., ' (a) Number of tracks at crossing: 1 - :1 ,., ,...,, (h) Name of each track fro,n E to W CF or(N or ( -1.5,77047 . . ' Tillamook Mainline ___ _______ _ .....___...., „....._, 4,' ------ — -- ---_— ---- ,, '-,. — .— --_-- __—__--- ——————- — ,,• '",' .411 —, . ------.... .1..........••■••,...... ..**, ..............r................ '4% L I, (2) Angie of intersection--- 72 if more thn one track-highway angle exists, please give details , —,, &.., below, track by track: ,.. ,,...", ' (3) Ni -rest switch--- At present: After-completion: N of erb — ssing: 42 ft 42 ft v 0, = (N/S/E/W) 1/ . S of crossing: , '700 ft 700 fi: ............. .........................,......................4..,.a........., ' /*: q ■ 0 ■ ','‘" 1 lc, ■' ' rOna AS.1/76 Page 6 , .• . 4 41.,%'6'''' 0, %•■. ' 77—'4, .`, ,, .,.." ••• 4 " :• .,,' !,''''':21,7,,',11,7:t: ' *,,",r!1, 4 ''''''' ' , '' ..",,hf.*,.,,,:: k ':'N'''')s ',. ,"s'.:' .i f:LI.:,... a ' ,...,.' , ,, !;,,,, 4. -i, ..1 ry i , .,' A F Y d r 10. Use of the crossing: a. The Highway 0w.11 .t (1 ) Average daily traffic volume--- tiY, 1 At preser��` : . 3260 After completion: 32 ' ' Expected 5 years after completion: 3780 `�'. ; (2) Speed of vehicles--- '• Expected , At present: after completion° ,4' 300 ft from crossing , ; on E approach: 35 mph 35 mph on W approach: —_ 35 mph _..�.__. 35 mph ' (S or W) At crossing: 5 mph 35 mph '�•:' Posted speed limit 0,.,, ,`'' on approaches 35 mph 3a rph � :ti, rii (3) Direction of traffic flow: E & W <,,, ,s b. The Railroad y P . (l ) Train movements-- Y. (avg per day) Expected I:, ,C At present: after completion., " Freight trains: �.____.. 5 b t; Switching movements: 4 4 ,,,, Passenger trains: 0 0 `a Ri (2) Speed of trains-- Maximum allowable: 30 mph 30 mph�; Typical : 25 25 � mph a� , __ mph II Slowest normal 5 mph 5 .'� r .._.a._... m h mph 1 Note: If the speed of trains over this crossing is to be increased ; , frc;m' a speed limit previously ordered by the Commi,ssi ier at ,' this crossing, include cs part (.f this application, a ', � r', petition to increase speed pursuant to ORS 753.035. . • �„ Form -1,17 Page ' .,, tii :t.. .R'.,.. ;w!aWR,.�.I t4T�lfAN/Stv.•o'•h6rin 'nM.d - y. .cy. - _ ..i_- ••-n:+ �,t a• •L w +.�}"F'- , w*`""w '"a•yvcT • i�.:f":;,r,+'`+CsvennM Mv�� ' .A� y a•,• - - - - -_. - .. - _ �� � _ __ .a 4. _ . "4' .i r. •• Ism`' i -I h , 1,1 ,?t 51 ..", V Ilya i . ,. 5 , ° 11. Visibility at the crossing from the standpoint of the approaching motor vehicle operator: iii a. Of approaching trai r'c--- (1) From a "stop" position The motor vehicle operator (approx. 18 feet from can see along the E edge cf nearest rail railroad . . . ,is on the . . . Y •' E approach: 1500 ft to right; 150C ft to left : ' N o r E) W approach: 1000 f t to right; _1500 ft to left TS or W) .. , (2) From a "safe stopping The motor vehicle operator distance" (see table can see along the . it below) on the . . . railroad . j. 'E appro.. h: _ 160 ft to right; 240 ft to left IN o E W approach: 320 ft to right; 375 t L to left S orT ,;_:; If these sight distances will be changed on completion of the project, please explain below: . Note: TABLE OF SAFE STOPPING DISTANCES ("SSD") Typical Typical r Approach Approach• 'i' Speed "SSD" Speed "SSD" ♦ ,, ' ' 10 mph 44 feet 35 mph 210 feet • 15 mph 69 feet 40 mph 256 feet ; 20 mph, 98 feet 45 mph 306 ft ,': 25 mph 131 feet 50 mph 360 feet 411 30 mph 169 feet 55 mph 418 feet F'or'm AS- 1/76 . Page 10.,.. ' 1 , C------'7"-,,I .. ..-7-1-;-4«P--:.ry;.. mmaEa�t'c a+ms% h'mer..v .Fm,. M-,,,f""\ .,:1". ' S,' .'1 Y • d;F � • u � ru, . .". tili b. Of the proposed protective devices° (1) Wi ul vision of the protective devices to be installed at the crossing l ' be obstructed on the main approach road within 1000 feet of the crossing? No n'` yeS/ncT If yes, please explain by what and at what points it will be .' obstructed. t pii 4i y lr: r 1 7f. rk; -� ( (2) If roadside mounted protective devices (such as STOP signs or Ztandard No. 2 flashing light signals) are to be installed at thy► w 1 rosbi ng, is the approaching driver's vision of these.. devices likely to be totally Gar partially obscured by parked vehicles? No :,4 e dyes/ '1' If yes, expcdin ' lw you propose to overcome this problem: r te . F�..� +rr... .r rr... \:r If no, why not? S oul ders of inadequate width to provide parking ad jt cent to ' .,"'y-"'. . 1. '� crossing. t:, ...1...k.. - w... ......4,.,w_..........,..,_,.. — ..__., bi r Nr RForm AS-1/75 '': Page `:, ) 0j'1 • fir.^"..n" ^7A11�'s,!.. FJF IgGI}iFM' w vm.�..f ..;TWeiYS""i;+ih!$•i�xul .' �., .. _ ,. ���.-..'.,., ,� Y ,y+ ;;.��t.. {.yQz'.rw,.v, ax�: nner'�.w+m�tma*�'+r+a......n�+r+yn a+"t`t- �.� , -1.�;�., 1#1 f' RY ." 7 ., "�.1111:��:,- P. ., • . -_..1 - _. 'fR'....r y1 ... \. -_ r • :. 1 N� . ,t, i� .:,�� l �:., d'�Y. _.... rx•f t •r1. _IL, . ,,,,,, ..,.... ,',/ ,, . ,, s., „ , ,,i ,, , . . . , `' .1,2. List the number and types of protective devices to be installed at the ,;rosi ng and on its approaches: �', •; n4, n,,)te: TYPES OE DEVICES Commissioner's Standard Nn. 1R,R, refl ectc'""i zed crossbucks '` ' ' Commissioner's Standard No. 1S, vehicle " SOP" signs Commissioner's Standard No. 2, flashing light signals with gongs :``., ;' ° Commissioner's Standard No 2B, cantilevered flashing lights w/gongs Commissioner's St ardard No 4, automatic gate signals* r. Commissioner's Standard No. 5, traffic signai.x Traffic signal.1 at adjacent intersection** a,��' Track Circuitry to interconnect with traffic signals R° :• Part-time turn restrict'on sign;,'** Star1urd advance warning signs '' ': standard advance warning pavement markers r �'''' 'standard ''STOP AHEAD" signs ..._. ... rb;` �{:,.` Standard ai l road "STOP" signs `�`.I * To be used ire conjunction with Standard No. 2 or No. 2B ;;�' flashing light signals. ole%ase indicate which it ���� ,';; twill be. ** Mase furnish description of traffic signal operation, including standard phasing and phasing upon train activation. . a. Protection type: #2 Flashing Icth ;,, wla ong Aliomlti tes Nurr5er� of such devices: 2 : To be located as follows: Each ride of ' c-ossi ng, 15' from roadvay centerline .'• (1 ) Who toll perform the installation? Southern Pacific Transaortation Co • (2) Estimated cost of installation: $ 42,000 **{ *1 { 'i; (3) Who will pay for said instP,ilati !'• Name of Park Percent of Cost Oregon D.0 e T. , Highway Division 90 �, "`�,,, L ti' S State Grade Cross rr Protection i. S g Fund j2 ,;, { Y x 4*i 44.4...-44 _ a w•.....++..`�f.�•ra.rrww f. r.y•L. +�•� ' Y I+ Wa 1�ri ngton Count h I 1 �1• Y ,.I � .,'di...:f.✓•.w^�+�iwa„ . ..nulr_rr - ' y J xr 1 ' M r *** Inci4de cost of furnishing the protecti e device(s). { 4 < Fora AS-l/75 Pads 10 C" .• .wr ,.tu _ w',"._ _ --.;'. - -. .--...- _.- - . -... ,;- ... • • ., . 7 . w r {�xa�..I j nd I -: '. r { 1. ��.Tya n � 1 t � � r .,.�aa{ y�i'pj fr� x ' ! ) t • + , , •j � (4) Who will maintain these devices? Southern Pacific Trapsportation Co. (5) Who will pay for said maintenance? Name of Party. Percent of Cost Southerh Pacific Transportation Co. 100 b. Protection type: Advance Warning Signs 81 Pavement Markings Number of such devices: ; To be located as follows: On east approach to crossing ((1 ) Who will perform the installation? Walhingto_Lolintsy (2) Estimated cost of installation: $ 100 *** (3) Who will pay for said installation? Name of Partx Percent of Cost Washington County 100 (4) Who will maintain these devices? Washington County (5) Who will pay for said maintenance? . 4 * . Name of Party. Percent of Cost Washington County 100 c, Protection type: OSHD "Ruraduardrail (Modified) Number of such devices: 2 J. To he located as fol10,13: hid 1.4 ‘I■ Oossing adjacentlo protective siqnaly? V7A6`‘ *4* Include cost of furnishing the protective device(s), cT721-- j; Form AS-1/75 ttt' Page 11 Cer r— . Y•MrOWewN•Ml'uNrw.YMiwiMNbY.wwlu.w..«.AM.V,..w.;w.�M.{wraWru..rrr...:..i - ^,y 9 ob . (1 ) Who will perform the installation? Oregon D.0.T e , Hi hwDi vi s i on is (2) Estimated cost of installation: $ 3,000 *** pi • (3) Who will pay for said installation? Name of Party Percent of Cost Oregon D.O.Te , Highway Division 90 State Grade Crossing Protection Fund 7-1/2 Washington County 2-1/2 (4) Who will maintain these devices? Washington County ___,_____�_^ �. (5) Who will pay for said maintenance? • Name of Party Percent of Cost Wa; hi ngton County � � 100 le .4.1.....*6...■*61.6......*.446.n....66616....w.4.............46..44..er........*1............... le.6..........j.....r.............*.*...”66.6.0.....* 13. Who will maintain the crossing? , a. .Between the rails and for a-distance of two feet outside thereof: Southern Paci fi c Transportation Company b. Remainder of crossing area: W a s h i n g t o n y ' FA . i:,` .- ■ ,, Include cost of furnishing the protective device(s). r Form AS-I/75 ., Nige 12 Y �...-. «.„.e , . i, F..itT2T.MiMMxn+fr'.Ywniw.+acu?'•1.,i:""u•"N'''ui'n'..+•'IFb'I?IY,1a>✓vrM.viriagr , ,urpr+i.TV.r.ri•.uw=•n•!+..4r.yi+*M'..y 'n .M.L'MTgN+N' /���`r'� V1 ..� �.i , . i . „ .,, . ., i,, ,,..., • • • 14. Who will pay for said maintenance? • a. Between the rails and for a distance of two feet outside thereof Southern Pacif c Transportation Company h. Remainder of crossing area: Washington County 15. If automatic protective devices are (to be) installed 7.!c. the crossing, please answer the following-. a. What type of device will be used to activate them? "e (Each track at the crossing should be covered in the answer. r` Example: Main track--predictor units; Spur tracks--island circuits. ) Main Track GCP Units (2) _.�..... . Strr Track North of crossing - short track circuit with railroad STOP sign. b. If automatic gates are to be i nstkIl l ed, are there any overhead wires or other obstacles which might impair the operation of the gate arm?' No If so, describe the obstacles, identify the owner and make the owner a party of interest in this matter. • 16. L st all crossings located within one-half mile of the proposed or to be altered crossing and show how they aee protected° FD-749.29_7 2 Auto Gates; W.w FD-749.30-C - 2 Auto Gates; 3E-033.50, to be protected with 2 Auto Gates .. rwlw.r..r.ww.wr..wrl ywr.rr+rnr�.uw.�.r - .••:.i••••••••• •u. "r.+•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••• •••• w••••* +..1.M i 'WV •.iwrirry.' r.rwwr,w • • • • Form AS-1/75 Page 13 • '6pon completion of this project, will it be possible to close any existing crossings in the area? No (yes/Fla) . If yes, please identify the crossing(s) to be closed in connection with this ; • project: • (The public authority with jurisdiction over the road at the crossing to be closed should be made a party of interest in the proceeding, if not one already. If it is likely that any party of interest in the closure will object, or that the matter will be decided at o public hearing before the Commissioner, an application for closure should be submitted on Form AX-1/75 by completing Sections I, IV, V, and the applicable portions of numbers 11 , 12 and 13. ) If no, explain why no tIll‘'erossir_igl_aassary'f8r' :6he ex E.1)..L_client floW traffic ___ ______ ro4, FAA,44...A■AAAAAA■Aw*A.ArA. oft*AAAAAAA.44m*.....ns*AAAu.....4......,*1,......... 18, Other items: This crossing is 118' from BN crossing No3E-033.50. #2FlashingAights and #4 Automatic Gates are to be installed at this BN crossing and inter-• connected with signals in this application. A train movement on either track will activate the signa.13 at that track plus the outside signal on the other iwrA.AmAAA Ai* track. The inside gate will be delayed to prevent trapping and inside gate on track not occupied ‘‘TiTd—rZoii.67----- . 19. Are the wraps and drawings required by the Division IV Commissioner's Rules and Regulations attached to this application? Yes - 26U-1 , -_ ./ ' PLEASE FURNISH SUFFICIENT COPIES OF THE APPLICATION AND DRAWINGS TO ENABLE US TO SERVE ALL PARTIES or INTEREST (INCLUDING STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION, COUNTY, 0 AND REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS) PLUS AN OkilINAL AND ONE COPY FOR OUR USE'. ‘4-5' eg--• PCX Porn AS-1/75 .00 ‘t,NAV Page 14 v r H M l y Applicant prays for an order permitting construction in accordance . . with this application, or for such other and further order as may be proper 4 in the premises. ç1ated at 2 -,--_____17±_________, Oregon, this / day of � . ,� , 19 . I „ ,,,.,,,, ,..,,,,i,,,v/e',e 7 ,,/1/4 Att, ? : APp 1 a da nti (-- ,2 . .,, , .. LAC ',____" 0., . _.�. .'.'-t �...._ �' Attorney I, ..., .,.._. f (,:. .,q,,,,, igi,, L ,e_ p ei. , being firs t ' duly sworn, say that I am the applicant in the within entitled cause, and �;. that the foregoing app° o cati on is true, as I verily believe. ''"2/9 a 1 O STATE OF OREGON ) , ss. A ' County of ) ubscri bed and sworn to before me this , .� / R' aay of � ;-�i� e. 1 rya / 4 404 I e.4 e :7,r,",*--"Z‘c:'' >0,,tf (,A, — 4 4 (otary Public for a4ego _. v 1 V r ipion Expi es� , -", ' 1 4 ► Form AS-1/75 Signature Page r . �.»-. ...�...: y...w:. ,. . .,. �nrucn r+un .,,:t• .., .:,,...�mn3,av�w+m^}+roe,.wrom.wru,,,�*.a,._,,,»,.+rs«..•n+'..•..+ -�'+fiw� 1 . A/ r, Iaufar.�ti�®rx�ca�w� � ;.e �i If/ - . ra _ At-C. ii _44.-. ••; 1 1,- t i tf_ I ,A.. f-- —'-'7 (2)' I 1 /,1, t ' ' r / f /F I "t t ' / I i t I f -ro 774 . .(1.4 } x JP �,�' 4*-- ------r--'_I.D* $t.,5 --° { d ' � F t 3t a. 5�� ,mil{` ia_t -Y _ fF- q� <- �`r_ � �s s ; i bit/ aFe S,,, i J I i.�'_ �A ,+vim,_ -,Cater _ t'S -r It ,l ,, _ ..N , i ; / , ;,r,., . __.... /, It LEGEND . Y +g. �- -.. - _ . `� - / ' ,sn,y�'t •``..�'``,_ _ - __ - ran�rt t `+J [j It _: S s _ t - Office.,of Divls:e.. yr - O �, /t! ,St.0301+ Po rand.°rasa,D 2• RED 5.-“,wt. ` ■ fit° j FiLLgts�4QX $ id i, • , _ S"T r"4,e+ ;y.J 1 - trtrasct.C�ous1syr WAXlsi, „5sysr 5- 61. _ t BON;TA ICfz cLi 749-70 -- # -- aC)r� - Y2 - - "sm.. [YS/QC{' D. N JfVL�[OR - E - - _ - - �• - - - - -- - ..�,�, _ Dimwit ift - CHEci`D ST Wi..SEC.i. S1dtT2/¢ - `' noun"=-'F ate 7'9E? aasiwpe xe s332u _ - --- 1 - - DATE 2-�]- Jh' SHEET a9. • _ - - _ - - ; - - -- f- REVISED TO FILE DRAWER - -_ --- - _ - - - f•sfX73D Ow OureCr NC t000:!CLSRRPRWS. S,Tt. - - DR4V/ 6 ! o - 44 U-l - - -•- - - - • - ♦ - 0 • Q - - ? - - ; - AIM (St ,*DRUM 14 11 — 1410W I-T 'JLUr{q UR-Rt. 1-- Iflt P-11 [ILEC -111 Li • O �• 4 P. o. BOX 127 * TUALATIN. OREGON 97062 • PHONE 638-6861 RUSSELL WASH�aURN, CHIEF TO: All Planning Departments within the Tualatin RFPD Because lack of accessibility for fire apparatus could hamper efficient firefighting operations and p,,esent a danger to life and property, we have determined the minimum requirements for access and maneuverability by fire apparatus. The enclosed street access requirements are based on actual measurements of the size and turning radii of the fire apparatus in service. While your current street standards may meet or exceed the enclosed standards, requests for variances may present a problem if granted unless these access requirements are taken into consideration. We would appreciate the opportunity to discuss any proposed plans which show a variance from these minimum standards. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 638-6861 . Sincerely yours, 400 ‘:4)' s ph A. Greu ich Fi e Marshal 1 JAG:dm • 1 • 1/ M .4 '' ♦ ,1 v ni p • PUBLIC ROAD STANDARDS ■ •r TRFPD would like to gee adherence to the city and county Jb+ subdivision road standards which is 32 feet of paving (inside curb to curb) c ,°\ If the standards are deviated from, the following standards need to be met: ;F 28 feet of paving (inside curb to curb) . ,. Parking allowed only on 1 side of the street 2'' Feet of paving (inside curb to curb) No parking allowed, no parking posted by signs. . • Suitable off street parking, to be provided. e Access through private parking lots shall be 24 feet, parking on the outside of the 24 feet. �� Streets limited to a maxi mum of 600 feet i n length, if dN.,.d--ended. .' If dead end is longer than 600 feet, street should be connected a� to another street, or provision provided to connect street to an Of adjacent subdivision at a future date, or emergency access pro- vided. ( Speci al problems such as islands in cul-de-sacs, islands at street entrances, corners sharper than 90° will l be checked by the Fire i Prevention Bureau on an individual basis for access requirements. foil See attached for private road c'_:;idards and street access, minimum requirements for fire apparatus.: • k !i , 1 } t a A .... ! + xue.._ar.,.«ys a .•«.,,,,,..nwa ter .„• ... ,.. ., ,. ., .W n • R y y 4 N1 N9 , 1 1 I ffi' V:: irJLTfl1 H 111 -RL -PAL fim -g f11. --it- 1 -P [ - mi4lcr M ,, P. 0. 130X 286 0 TUA,LATIN, OREGON 97062 a PHONE 638-6861 * RUSSELL KYASHBURN, CHIEF STREET ACCESS MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE APPARATUS r CUL-DE-SAC ;• No mi rr nium turnaround for cul-de-sac shorter than 200' unless there is an island, I Turnaround - Min. radius 42' w/no curb parking (50" commercial ) 50 w/curb parking Min. clear width to island - 18' Min. return radius 26' (25' for 44' radius turnaround) Access to cul-de-sac street (residential ) (Max. length 600' ) Mina inside radius - 26' Min. width - 24' (parking both sides beyond 10' from half , way around curve) (25' radius for, 28' width, parking 2 sides) (20' radius for no parking within 20' and width 28' , provided cul-de-sac return radius is measured . from a point 15' or more from the access radius) Access to Street other than cul-de-sac street from 32' street 0 Min. curb radius - 28'-30' Min. width 24' - 301+ Min. width 22' ; No parking 20' from a point halfway around the turn, measured along the curb. . If min. width increased 2' -- no parking for 15' Minimum width is measured perpendicular to the tangent of an arc with tho minimum radius. . , i j ,. .. .. .-.N.w.Nm< .„';,, «.,.., .��.-w.»a9,w:..ww n..,'....»,:..«._,w,w...:,'.,,,.•ry.. .,, .. ._ ......... ........ „_......... .. „., _ (‘. , , • PR 1 VAT E Po A 0 S TA 1.,. DA 1RD3 , . . SCALE : 1 " - 3 ' HorR,(z. . Klo 5C4,LE. ' ' 1 ... I . ) 0' __ __ ..„.„zo.L._,„„2,„ ==...,,,,,....7,..,,,,..„,...,--,••••••-...,,,,,‘ r-,-...,r,... 1_07 ../ A oR 4" C,R4 G P.■ ( PAVE OV ER E.OGE '.)F GRAVEL I ' • 1 . „1/4............___ ...,. , "7"--------,. ,--;,------ -------------- -----n FoR eog,,-3 L 0-rs , ... -A.C.--') 4 J:Z,GP,. --7—C" CO 1-1 PAC T E.-D 1 . I ...■..............■ 1110 1 .. t Q's- A. c. 0P7101,,IA/... i I ; I 1\107E: FOR 5 oR tioR "' LC./ 'E E'x-i-E.Ni- AND Ty PE OF 1 11 PROVE*MENT WILL. DEpEktO oN „, ,s1-1-APE., $ zE• AND 01-HER CoND/TioNs R E LAT N 6 TO TH E ?0Pa. TY 8 E../N.1 C:-.1 DEvriLc2przp ' G F-1■IER A\_l..Y A\ coL;h11-y ROAD vs/ILCrBe RECQUI RI5 0 FOR_ TH Is K.11.)?-1 Lae:2 oF t,.075 1 4 1 ' I ' l ■ .., I . . ■ ■ ■j, •t , - ',61 • ,- I • . ^ . ' . .. )1 . _ • 1, ) .. . .,, . A "--• I ' h 4 •4;14 ' ,t ... J ' '\ ilN, 4 • . v )0p Al , C i 1 . (---:-:..„\ , qi. ,,,/fri......„(9, ,,,,,, ......: ( Ili , /,__.__--,-------- i, •, :. b rd/.,l'/'''',ei';‘,,‘/"(?/'6'' 7 di . .10 j�' r 1 I 'l' \ , ,......e..-61---- -'''', ' r 3i Yd A / tdet:',;}1 . ."11"(: , . O NYC e itt.;‘" , �''","mss ', mf p� ,14 'A 6;7:21 rye .#4?"4"4":".7;04;;;,(:„1/4,,,t ./,,,..p..-Orr#' „0.-- . I,�/4�' • 1' r Y , v r d "* ti,,eler 417‘41:;" ' oigl.' ,_..0.' Cell/ 1 , "rii- . 7,;„11' "i "rj4e4.11/ 0/1.* 0 , ' ,'" Ar fiv,,,,,,f '7444 /I' ' , ,...,,,,..;,44 IR d' s 1 i fie/j/4. ,,,,;,,,, , 4.fr. /I , , IV iiii/r" sm4rdetli .,..�......,......•. !.x.�w.w.Yp.RawYmY"V' '+w^rR4*artc+w�w•r13'+t;m..�wn•u«nexr...». +«�-�wr� - .r...:�..wnnNrw-x�.... .�- /H ... y .�...,-., .. • ... .' r ,si'o' it J u, h 1, . 1•N •' t d XCESS (A. THE TAX BASE OF THE CITY,AS COMPUTED IN ACCORDANCE 'fib ALLOT QUESTION year for each of 3 years to Tigard Community Youth tional expenses of that organization. Tigard Community to keep youth out of the juvenile court system through eferraL, parent education, big brother and big sister v. ting budget to be financed wholly L..• Local taxes for the eater than that hortioo of the operating budget financed e 9 cents per 1,000,assessedvaluation and wo reduee�.„. reased assessed v uattions. • 1?✓'' ' ould be $2.70• tide the votin Ire to jidi. . "'' F a / � 'ote in favor o- the proposed v • • 'ore against the pre. sed 1e �, ✓ �L- i'LEVY PROPOSAL .' ''�q ( BEHALF OF TIGARD LOAVE.' AND FY INC., FOR ACED 7 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1978 THE,SUM,0 $5,000 IN o NL E WITH SECTION 11, ARTICLE XI, OREGON CONSTITUTION? ALLOT QUESTION t I � ga,,:d Loaves and Fishes to dofrny a'portion of the nutritional, transportation and other services to i.ng budget'financed wholly by Tigard taxes for the t.aX of the operating budget financed Wholly by Tigard taxes r 1,000 assessed valuation. "' w5UIr be 60 ceats: +� m. tide the voting square to indicate 'Ste in fa,+tor of the proposed levy., ,ote against the proposed levy. • • w....,, ., y.»snawr-2.nf+w..,-w;.rvr..�w.ar.w .,.«m. ' a+w:,�y,.y n�i�,.a..... -�.•�iR^`� x d�A +..win.••--won .. '" r