Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CPA1992-00007
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. MIN 7,7 rj� rt, ", PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: CPA 92 -0007 FILE d I I L.+: CITY OF TIGARD APPLIT: Engineering Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Halt Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 A request for Comprehen sive Plan Amendment allow-fer-a-ProVuutsd-amendment-to-T4gardLe- TranePortation Plan trap which relates to alignment of a collector street connecting Street and S.W. Gaarde Street . approval to a Prekeneime. the future S.W. W lnut' APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning 'comprehensive Plan Policies: 1..1. 1.1..2, w.,�: , 8.1. Community Development ^Cede Chapter® 18.22418.30, LOCATION: Ooale: 1, 12. 11.3.1, 11.3.2. 134.4.0 Ittbutm,{ "et+s ° `we ' 04 SW I t e4' q e),4,14fiL ftf. (0-46144+ sixec4 .eatt *if tA) 13,1,4 NPO NO: 3 NPO CHAIRPERSON: f39- 089 ® %tG39 ®4297 Pool � PHONE NUMBER: cHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: a .�. STAFF DECISION COMMENTs - DUE SAC TO STAFF ON 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIHEa :30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME :l 00 CITY COUNCIL DAteS OP HEARING: TINE: :30 OBEREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/ZONE CHANGE/ZONE CHANGEZMIMIGILAMEADMIPLUMQK CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 1. GENERAL INFORNATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION SITE SIZE PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* ADDRESS / PHONE APPLICANT C.t ItlaIN . ADDRESS CITY *When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must -'be the.purchaser of record or a l possession with authorization eases in , written nut from the owner or an agent of the owner --with written, authorization. The owner( s) must sign this application in the space provided on Page two or submit a written authorization Ifith this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY xhe owners of re request a Compr applicable) from and a Zone Change fr CASE NO. C..Pi1: 9 t1 000 .% OTHER ` CASE NO'S: m-�- RECEIPT NO �.�...°` APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: J, O4kr DATE: If) .oI 9'11. Application elements submitted: "(A) Application form (1) (B) itten a Applicant's statement (preapp check list) (D) Filing fee (t" ct`') Additional information for Compre sive Plan Map Amendments /Zone Changes (E) property ldeutTUH-fpreepp check list) _.!"...(F)44-60,t-04-pveperty owners and PadrPAstes..xithin 250 feet (1) (G) ilossamaacla0ap (1) nstrument Cl) DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: COMP. P /ZONE DESIGNATION: Nib The applicant requests an amendment to the following sections of the Comprehensive Plan Planning Commission Approval Date: &L 0737P/23Pe 3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered' 1 � as part of this application: • Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments - described in the attached information sheet ' at the time you submit application. Ao . The ..above ues t does not, oia any e attached to or `ice used u on the subject ro arty. to mn deed, restrictions'. .��,,..d.�.- ctio�s•• that : ma • • • If the ppli.cation is grantCd, the applicant . will exercise the rights granted in accordance °with tho, terms and s g - subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. statements in the plot, plan9 4:. statements and the attachaments and exhibits of the above s t • transmitted herewith, are true; and � the bits a d her applicants • so acknowledge that any permit: i sued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such. statements are false. The applicant has read the entire 'contents of the a pp lic ction , includi ng the policies and criteria, and understands• the requirements for approving or denying the application. day of 19 SIGNATURES' of each owner (eg. husboad .and wife) of the subject property October 1992 Requested Revision to the Comprehensive Tan Transportation Map GAARDE STREET EXTENSION Proposal Currently, the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map includes a study area referenced to Note 2 Note 2 indicates that two options are under consideration for a future connection between the Walnut/132nd intersection and the Gaarde /121st intersection. It is proposed to select one of the two options under consideration and to amend the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map to reflect the option chosen. History In 1983, the City of Tigard and Washington County both adopted comprehensive, plans that called for a future extension of Murray Boulevard to connect with the intersection of 1PUalnut Street and 135th Avenue. Both plans also called for future connections between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street in the area west of 121st Avenue. No specific alignments were indicated. �,6 ' g planning g g cities In 1986, indicated meats with the Washington County entered into urban lann�n area agreements . of Beaverton and Tigard. The agreements indicated that the extension of Murray Boulevard would be designated as a collector street and provided a drawing showing the alignment between Old Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. In addition, the agreements stated that an alignment would be developed for a collector street between the 135th Avenue/Walnut Street and the 121st Avenue /Gaarde Street intersections. The agreements established design standards for the road: In 1939, the City began its Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study, intended to define the future collector street system for the area. Following several public meetings, including hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, most of the recommendations of the Northeast Bull! Mountain Transportation Study Report were adopted in April of 1990 However, the recommendations regarding the connection between 135thlVllalnut and 121 st/Gaarde intersection were not adopted; at the close of p the hearings, two options remained under consideration. In .addition, the Council had heard requests that the urban planning area agreements be amended to delete the Murray Boulevard connection between Old Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street due to OAARIOE. STREET EXTENSION October 1992 Page 1'' AfingnewiffessammuFax concerns about thro'. gh traffic. Selection of the preferred option for the Walnut-Gaarde connection was deferred pending a decision on whether the urban planning area agreement would be modified. In subsequent discussions with other jurisdictions, there was not support for amending the urban planning area agreements. However, there was support for an agreement on that timing of the proposed Murray Boulevard extension. As a result, an agreement was drafted that assures that the Murray Boulevard extension between Scholls Ferry Road and Old Scholls Ferry Road shall not be opened to through traffic prior to the completion of other road improvements on the west side of Bull Mountain as provided in the County's Transportation Plan. The agreement is intended to discourage the development of the Murray Boulevard extension as a route for through traffic. The agreement h;as been approved by Washington County and the cities of Beaverton and Tigard; the agreement was signed in January 1992. g ' p p ation Map was updated in 1991, a study When Ti and s Comprehensive Plan Transportation area was added to indicate the two options still being considered for the collector street connection between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street. The study area is known as "Note 2 ". A copy of the map is included as Attachment #1. It is now proposed that the process be completed by adopting one of the options for a collector street connection between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street Etemor t The 1990 recommendation of the City staff was contained in Figure 12 -1 of the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study Report. ( S ®�® tt� c Attachment #2.) Under this plan, Gaarde Street wound be extended as a major collector street west and north from 121st Avenue to connect to Walnut Street at a location 300 feet to 400 feet east location ast of existing 132nd Avenue. In addition, the Report recommended that side street access to the major collector be restricted, that direct driveway access be prohibited, and that reduced design widths be considered between access points. This option will be referred to as the Report Option. NPO Option The Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO #3) recommended Street be P _. ed that Gaarde S reN NPO Avenue. The extended west from 121st _ Under . st �s a minor collector, connecting to 32 �, �e�er this o tion, . that the would be designed for a speed connection 25 mph. betwccr� Gaarde and recommended _ vi the collector street �.onneot existing 1 32nd Avenue would pro de Walnut Streets. • subdivision the 132nd Avenue ." i n alon� th In 1991 preliminary P submitted for a su ivis � on the proposed intersection. Dunn the hearings p p a plat was extension west.. of the Gaarde/121st to 9 GAARDE STREET EXTENSION ' October 1992 Rage subdivision, there was substantial discussion of whether the subdivision 'should provide for the westweird extension of Gaarde as proposed by the NPO. After: reviewing alternatives submitted b y the a pp licant, the Planning Commission voted tapprove preliminary subdivision layout that did not directly provide for the Gaarde extension to 132nd. Commission members were persuaded that the site w not suitable for construction of an east -west collector street due to steep grades. Evidence was provided that a collector connection to 1 32nd Avenue could better be provided north of the wite where grades are less steep. On appeal, the Planning Commission's decision was upheld by the City Council in Resolution 91 -75. Consequently, the NPO Option represented in Attachment #3 shows Gaarde extended west and north from 121st to intersect 132nd at a location near Benchview Terrace (north of the approved subdivision situ. Traffic Comparisons In conjunction with the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study, future traffic volumes on the collector street system were forecast. The terecasts assumed full practical development under existing development of the area, based on maximum prapt p g zoning and recognizing the development restrictions of steep slopes, drainageways and existing subdivisions. Based on these forecasts, Appendix E in the Northeast Bull Mountain Study Report contains material on future street capacities. Appendix E indicates that the collector street system designed to typical City of Tigard standards will provide acceptable levels of service under projected future traffic volumes, except at a few intersections. Additional traffic lanes may be needed in the future at some intersections. These intersections are along the Walnut/Murray connector from 135th to Scholls Ferry Road; along Gaarde Street near Highway 99W; and possibly at the intersection of 121st and walnut. The information in Appendix Report Option pp dix � assumed that the R® ort � tion would be adopted...: Selection of the NPO Option would not change the general conclusions stated above. However, selection of the NPO change traffic projections on some streets, `� Option would done in 19 p . based on work do is x990 in conjunction with the Copies of the 1990 St as discussed below. All discussion. !�; n Stud. Co Jud !Report are Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation y� p Study available for review in the City Engineering Department. The NP Option Lion would reduce the future traffic on Gaarde Street. west of 121st � C} Avenue, the build -out traffic be approximately 5,000 vehicles ffic under the NPO would p er day, compared to 10,000 vehicles cl es p er day under the Report Option. Under either option, the projected volumes exceed the guidelines for a minor collector street and fall within the volumes typical for a .major collector. A two -lane street with a center turn lane at intersections would be adequate under either option. AARDE ST EEY E TENSION - October 1992.. • age 3 Oil Gaarde Street near Highway 99W, the NPO OptioD reduces projected traffic volumes by approximately 20 %. The need for fut re additional turn iauies would be delayed but the long -term facility requirements would be generally the same as for the Report Option. On Walnut Street near 1 35th, the NPO Option reduces projected build -out traffic volumes from approximately 16,000 vehicles per day under the Report Option to approximately 1 0,000 vehicles per day under the NPO Option. Any need for additional future lanes at the 1 35th intersections would probably be eliminated under the NPO Option. Traffic removed from Gaarde Street under the NPO Option would divert to other routes. Impacts would be most noticeable south of Walnut Street on 132nd Avenue and 121st Avenue. Under the Report Option, 132nd would remain a local street between Walnut and Renohview. Under the NPO Option, 132nd would become a collector street with a projected traffic volume of 4,000 vehicles per day. , On 121st between Walnut and Gaarde, the projected traffic under the NPO Option is roughly twice the projected traffic under the Report Option. When compared to the Report Option, the NPO Option is projected to increase future traffic volumes on 121st north of Walnut by approximately 17% and on Bull Mountain Road west of the 135th ext ansion by approximately 29%. Smaller increases could be expected on other collector streets including the 135th extension south of Walnut, North Dakota Street, Bull Mountain Road east of the 135th extension, 'and the future Sunrise Lane connection. These traffic comparisons are summarized in Attachment No. 4. Land -Use Inn acts In general, both options are located through currently undeveloped property. The roadways would be constructed as new subdivisions are developed in the area. Roadway alignments and grades would be coordinated with the design of the new subdivisions. An exception in the Report Option is the area immediately south of Walnut Street. To complete the connection to Walnut, it is likely that the City would eventually need to acquire and remove two existing homes. An exception in the NPO Option is the area along existing 132nd Avenue south of Walnut Street. The existing street is narrow and has no sidewalks. Several of the existing homes have very steep driveways. Widening this portion of 132nd to collector standards do or adding sidewalks would require major reconstruction of driveways. In some cases, it might be g be necessary to abandon vehicle accesses to existing garages. Major retaining Walls would be nece4 nary in some locations, OAARb ' STRET EXTgIV Si0`N - October X1002. Page4 Coordination with Other Plans State regulations require that comprehensive plans be coordinated with those of adjoining jurisdictions. The existing Regional Transportation Plan, the Washington County Transportation Plan, and the urban planning area agreements with the County and the City of Beaverton all call fora collector street connection between 135th/Walnut and 121st/Gaarde intersection. To satisfy State regulations, Tigard must either adopt a plan consistent with these other existing plans or persuade the other jurisdictions to amend their plans. When the other plans were adopted, it was envisioned that the connection between Walnut and Gaarde would be a direct extension of Murray Boulevard. It could be argued that neither of the options currently under consideration precisely complies with this concept. However, the Report Option is more closely in compliance than the NIPO Option. Operationally, the Report Option shows little difference from the previously planned the concept. Its route is only slightly different from those considered when thn plans p direct-connection g h ed sportatio comprehensive fans were adopted. During the Northeast Bull Mountain in order to and the J routes were e Study, this route was selected n development. From previous us di,!�cussians with County staff, itpa ears that this o tion is sufficiently in conformance with existing plans to be considered in comp liace. It appears that adoption of the Report Option would not p Pp require amendment of the other existing plans. The NPO Option deviates further from the direct- connection concept. As proposed by the NPO, this option would not comply with the design standards adopted in the urban planning area agreements. If this option is selected, it appers that Tigard would need to request corresponding amendments in the other plans and agreements prior' to adopting the plan. Timing a:undno p anticipated de as Whichever option is chosen, it is that. the improvements well be ma development area occurs. subdivisionis piece of the p improvements. The countywide TIF Traffic. Impact Its ment of the ar subdivision rm rovernents. ® p roadway as part of the subd i p y Fee) ordinance provides for TIF credits to developers who construct portions of this roadway connection. The TIE credits would apply all of the Report Option `route ` Y, ' I to e, it Is not clear which portions, if any, of the NPO Option route would qualify for the TIF credits. Walnut Street is already developed and is unlikely to The area immediately adjacent to Waln � y � In this area the collector y next 2 the City, Under the Rep oft experience substantial redevelopment within the na ears merits would,: likely need to be completed � p street improve y p by ate TIF funds could be used be used to complete the collector e Option, p s #rest. It is note., clear GAA RDE STREET EXTENSION October 1992 Page o if TIP funds could be used to upgrade existing 132nd Avenue to collector standards under the NPO Option. Preliminary cost estimates indicate that the NPO Option would be more expensive than the Re.. ort Option to construct. Because the NPO Option would traverse more steep • � require more earthwork than the Report Option. Widening of existing terrain, it would requ construction of 132nd Avenue to collector standards would require extensive earthwork, It is retaining wallc, right of way acquisition, and reconstruction of existing driveways. rd imeteis estimated that the improvements requiring City funding woudC.: cost pp $150,000 to $200,000 more under the NPO Option. private development of subdivisions, the schedule of actual Since construction is ti ed t o construction is not known. If necessary, the City could eventually complete any missing sections of the roadway and recover the costs from developers as the remaining land is developed. E Alicnrr�,ents p The Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map describes street alignments in general roadway alignments are usually determined at the time of actual development. The precis e alignment t erms. Precise ..-_. ig nt is typically based on more detailed engineering and n nme the needs of the specific developments that are proposed. Therefore, the proposed op tions describe only the approximate alignment of the future streets. When specific development proposals are considered, there is additional opportunity for public review and comment on the specific alignments. projected future traffic volumes are within the range associated Under either option,. the pr ®j • her option, with major collector streets in Tigard (1,500 to 10,000 et In 0,000 vehicles per day). O r�op can it is recommended that major collector should apply. with Report p Hector standards- shoo more easily meet the collector standards as it follows a gentle grades. route with more entle gra e y The NPO Option would traverse a steep rugged would require ed area east of 132nd and . steeper grades. g - s. Existing grades on 132nd Avenue exceed collector street standards. Discussion that the NPO Option is more ' � as it has lower projected re desirable Forst review may suggest t p ble However, further s that review iw future traffic volumes on the Gaarde extension. collector ' existing such as . o or street rted to : ex�stm n are already substantially C� Option : o other streets a y traffic will be dive exist 121 sr, 132nd, HP and Bull Mountain load. `These existing d i • and are not well planned for high traffic ' residential areas f 121 st 13 n low density .rest creme on conclude that it is preferable . developed as carry � rues. We co vo u � : Ie to car,.... more of the future traffic in accommodate the new roadway e appropriately to acco� a where new subdivision .. el designed subdivisions can be appropnat ..,.. traffic volume. This way, the increased traffic resulting from new development the greater tra�f�c y MIRE. ETI EE EXTENSION - October 1992. • Fags 6 • will. to a g reater extent,.be routed to the new streets created by new development, , 'ratheer . than. to the existing streets. Therefore, we find that the Report Option is the prefer option for the routing of traffic. ® also find that the Report Option is a better route in that it will have more gentle !f� . has fewer impacts to existing residential 'properties, and avoids the need to., g�i�des, p reconstruct existing 132nd AAenue south of Walnut. is existing we find that the Report Option s in compliance with ex s tin g re g ita,nal and local that the amendments to exi$ing plans could �a obtained to plans„ We are not op timistic .: bring the NPO Option into compliance. Recomnnendatians Plan Transportation the Comprehensive p It is recommended that the Note 2 study area on In Map be replaced by the Report Option alignment as`. depicted in Attachment #2. addition, recommended that Note follows: dditic�n, it is recorn 2 be revised to read as fo n Gaarde Street to be extended west and north from 121st Avenue to connect with Walnut Street at a point 300 feet to 400 feet east of SW 132nd Avenue, Direct driveway access shall be prohibited along the ' aarde h to °e minimum. The . shall be kept roadway connections the standards for major collector Street extension and r ®a � reduced below e9 width the th o street may be streets where turn lanes are not required, rw/note2 Aeo v � atu, cod a r�x•�l�t dedoj► rye s G GLtov, IJ (ti 1?--,q /1z ae 41• s ,shsid s /sa 9►4 Aekee. `701j-C. fo/xei/q2-- 5&t,i/L SjOks.- aftex 'Aloe Atioie. /5 *kJ 6qe6,3 orvl rlv cie;‘," Tredivenintro7 P .ems,!). �avt.e. 181 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] IIIMMOMM AIITERXAL mare MAJOR COLLECTOR ,-*••� MINOR COLLECTOR --=-- LOCAL '.STREET APPROXIMATL ALIGNMENT (Exact alignment to be ig determia.ed at time of develo eat. 'TRAFFIC SIGNAL '♦S._ (When Warranted) Corridor location 300' - 400' east cg 132nd Avenue at Walnut St. Bull Mountain Rd.; �.. intersection agproxiataly 700• wont of 126th ]Dire. SW 131st ye. ti � •Y Sunrise Ln. S.`1N. 150th � -.^' .•�: � red a.el 4 . I ARTERIAL MAJOR COLLECTOR •+•••••• MINOR COLLECTOR ---� -- LOCAL STREET ,APPROXIMATE ALIGNMENT !Exact alignment to be v determined at time of 82 development. TRAFFIC SIGNAL When Warranted) S. . !21st NPO OPTION Kist , Ave. -N- - 216% : Projected traffic, under NP) Option compared to Report Option. Numbers below 100% indicate • that 1VPO Option would have . less traffic than Report Option. Numbers over 100% indicate that NPO Option would have more traffic theca, Report Option. s. . N O T I C E O F PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAK, pagembrer 7. 1992, AT 2120 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW' HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO CPA 92 -0007 FILE TITLE: City of Tigard APPLICANT: Engineering Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall. Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CPA 92 -0007 CITY OF TIGARD (NPO #3) VE N AMENDMENT � A request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment pproval to the Transportation Plan Map which 'relates to the future alignment of a collector street connecting S.W. Walnut Street and S.W. Gaarde street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goale 1, 2, 5, and 12; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1a, 1..1.2, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 11.3.1, and 11.3.2; Community Development Cede Chapters 18.22 and '18.30. LOCATION: Mountain (west of SW Street, south of Walnut Street, and east of SW 132nd OWNER: THE COMMISSION'S REVIEW IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A COUNCIL ON THIS REQUEST. THE CITY COUNCIL WILL ALSO REQUEST PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION ON THIS REQUEST. ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OP PUBLIC CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDUCTED CODE RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH' IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRI'.P IN TEN TESTIMONY ON PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO 121st Avenue and SW Gaarde Avenue. RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY' CONDUCT A HEARING ON THIS ; I TO T THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION, WILL RE I AT WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAX BE PRESE THE Pi�BLIC tivARiN�. A,�. CIEVm STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC, HEARING; AND INVITE ' GN y. R TESTIMONY THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC BHEARINGG TOE ANOTHER E, E OR CLOSE I�E�� NG TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION,. j w ION. IF A PERSON SUBMIT PNBSUP HR PARTY IS ENTITLED TO C EVIDENCE IN ST1PPOktARINGTHE APPLICATION AFTER . ON THE APPLICATION ANY REQUEST ANCE OF TEE `HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE G AT THE GRANTED A HEARING, AANY ,PARTICIPANT '.INTHE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN' OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE, HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' CODE, THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND I STATEWIDE 'PLANNING GOALS. APPROVAL OR " DISAPPROVAL OP'` THE1 R 1,° CSSIl9B'. WILL', .BE BASED ' UPON , THESE. 'CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA RING h! " IS ` IMPORTANT . TNA,T COMMENTS RELATING TO T'HE RE CIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA ,LISTED QUEST BY ; TH8 ILY.: AT IRST, '' PERTAIPI FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR ,BY LITTER;AT ' SOMIS L'POINT PRIOR TO THE ,C HOSE OF, THE',; HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR .'FAILS TO PROVIDE' SUFrEcI1NT SPECIFICITY "TO AFFORD' THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOIID TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT 'ISSN. RLL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE . CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE.INOT'ID F` ARE AVAILABLE; INSPECTION AT NO COST , OR COPIES CAN;', BE OBTAINED FOR 'TZN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST f�SVEN ';DAYS ` PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFL' REPORT WILL' ;BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR ' TEN CENTS. PER `PAGE. .FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THB CITY EIC$INEER Randy . Wed1w . AT 539= 4171,,TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW, HALL BLVD.,,, OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD ,PLANNING tIRGANIZATION '(NPO) # 3 CHAIRPERSON: Herman Porter' PHONE NUMBER: 63 0095 M1 J' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCa'L, AT ITS MEETING ON TUESDAY, _____, AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGiRD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO CPA 92-0007 FILE TITLE City of Tigard APPLICANT: Engineering Department OWNER: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 92 -0007 CITY OF TIGARD (NPO A request for comprehensive Plan Amendment approval to the Transportation Plan Map which relates to the future alignment of a collector street connecting S.W. Walnut Street and S.W. Gaarde Otreet. APPLICABLE' REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, and 12; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1a, 1.1.2, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 11.3.1, and 11.3.2; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22 and 18.30. LOCATION: Northeast side of Bull Mountain (west000fSS 121st AAAvenue and SW' Gaarde Street, south of Walnut Street, and eae enue. THE THIS MATTER WILL UCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OFI B CHAPTER 18 32 OF THE COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WHITING PRIOIL TO OR AT THE P. FSLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT r *r a LL RECIEVE A A THE PUBLIC H'�,ARING. OPEN THE PUBLIC WING; AND • ABC THE PUBLIC OPEITY COUNCIL .... HEARING, THE C STAFF REPORT PF,ESENTATION FROM THE , ; INVITE BOTH OR11I, AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE CITY COUNCIL MAY CONTINUE THE C HEARING TO ANOTHER M TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THELI THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS THE PUBLIC HEARING ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST TO THE APPLICATION AFTER r CONTINUANCE OF H HEARING HARE IS NO CONTINUANCE THE QUEST A CONT F TNEIHEAR�INGHEARIN THERhRIQ ST THAT THE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE MENT'CODE AND � THE FROM THE TIGARD C , .. THE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE REQUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOP THE TIGARD APPROVAL TA ESE CRITERIA BY THE CITY' COMPREHENSIVE PLANS PRQVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE RSQUS COUNCIL WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND RIA ONLY. AT THE w • P I1 HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN! SPECIFICALLY . TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LYSTxD .. " FAILURE FAILURE T6 RSE R OS, UEHER `H SUU FFICIE TErg Fg� ISSUE WITH S TO RAISE AN ISSUE • E THE CITY, APPLICANT, FAI SPECIFICITY SO AS TO PROVIDE APPLICATION WITH A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND, ;I'LL PRECLUDE APPEAL; SAID ISSUE ' TO THE STATE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS '4(LUB.A) • ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE.. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF. THE STAFF REPORT WILL ,BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN' BE OBTAINED 'FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORDER OR CITY ENGINEER Rat'S►�iv- Woolev . AT 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON 97223. ON PLACE., UNDHR CITY OF TIGARD LOGO The fo5i.lowing will be considered by the Tigard, Planning Commieaic:1 on p.c. r� Tigard Civic �1g92��, 7 �Q.��t at the T g .center To►an Sall; 1312 Std. ail, Blvd., -, Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written ` testimony :is in i tcid. The public .hearing on this matter will be conducted in 'accordance , with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal ' Code, 'arid , rules' and procedures of the Planning Commission. , Failure to raise an issue ill per: son or by' ° letter ' precludes an appeal, and failure to specify the c iterion' from the Co munit Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which arcomment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information` may be Obtained from the Planning Division at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, . or by calling 639 -4171. d 1 PUBLIC. HEARINGS P �:. - .:_A 1...x,!:. Y. _ 9 -' 0 �!. �` �U (NPO #3) requeot for Comprehensive Plan Fsmendment: approval to the Transportation Plan Nap which relates to the future alignment of .a collector street connecting S.W. Walnut Street and S.W. Gaarde Street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITIRIAs ,Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, and 12j ComPrehonsive Plan Policies 1.1.1a 1.1.'2, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 11+ 3.1, and 11.3.2 f Community Development code Chapters 18.22 and 18.30. LOCATIONS. Northeast side of Bull Mountain (west of SW 121st Avenue and SW 'Gaarde Street, south of Walnut Street, and east of sw 132nd Avenue. PUBLISH J• I ',UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO . IN LEGAL NOTICE SECTION* OF TIGARD PUBLIC;, LING The g ' ioliowin will considered by the Tigard City Council on 1992, at 7 :30 P.M. *' at Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall, Room, ' • 13125 SW Hall,, BouleVard, Tigard, Oregon. Further information may be obtained, from the,, Community Development Director or City Recorder at the same location; or by calling 639 4171. You are invited to submit' written testimony in adr ce of the public ha*ringf' 'written and oral tebtimony . will be considered ,;. at the ;hearing. The " Public ' hearing` will be 'conducted in accordance with the applicable .Chapter: 18.32 of the 'Tigard Municipal code and any rules of procedure' adopted by the Council and available at City Hall. S" VS LAN P 9 -000 C T]E ' OF IG, ' ,(NPO 413)' request Comprehensive ��uAmendment �r T��atidh Pl' aP whichateeto thet alignment, of collector street connecting vi.W. Walnut Street and S.W. Gaarde Street. APPLICABLE RBVIEW CR ITERIAa Statewide Planning Goals 1, ` 2, 5, and 121 ,comprehenaivsi Plan, Policies 1.1.1a, 1.1.2, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 11.3.1, and 11.3.2; Coemunity, De velopment Code Chapters 18.22 and 18.30. LOCATION: Northeast Bide of Bull ain (west of SW 121st_ Avenue and SW Gaarde Street, south Of Walnut Street, and east of 'SW 132nd Avenue. a. +, t TT PUBLISH 1 4 CITY OF TI GARD Washington County', Oregon NOTIC8 OF FINAL, Mei 7 BF' CITY COUNCIL Concerning Case Number (s) Nate of Applicant s .City` of `T#.aaxd . r Address 3 25 SW Hall R�.gd. City . , .a c State C Zip Location: A x gagyde Strom south Tax Map f W 8 nut Str t at of SW 1211t ,anndd -BW. ant __ o SW 1 . nd " v n ne, and, ',Lot No (e) • a NA , ..mss r��.s�.ar�+in�ws.r�.�n�� Co gisenn ^ 5 _ _ gilendment mpDrova. t1�9,_... t . n x" . et;cQSi�ectinahl W Wain alianmen of Statewide St LS RBVIRW„.___ ewide Plann n cioale 1 2, i d 122 Comprehensive 9 . y, . .8 .l.. , 8._x.24 11.3.1. and Ltd Ivel oic nt �Gode c tern 18 .22 and 18.30. AeqUeet a' Tra .. t on t,- dS. P o_ cies �.1 3 . t_. Can,, 6. Action s, ,, ___.___ Approval a requested Approval with conditions Denial Not ices Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Wall, and mailed to: The applicant and owners) X Owners of record within the required diotasl X The affected Neighborhood Planing Organisation X Affected governmental agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION WAS 8�tiNSD ON BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON �M The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can n r Tigard ll o 13125 8B be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Cit3►l�a Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard Oregon 97223. A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Uee Board of Appeals (CUBA) according to their Procedures. • QUESTIONS: If you have any queetiooe, please call the Tigard City Recorder at 639 -4171. ST MRSSaglEin DATE: Octobe c�2,�. 1992 FROM Tigard Planning Department RS * GgultillB'HB.mS P lei x�, I� D d: - CPA 92.. • 00 C • F TI (NPO #3) es to the future alignment A request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval to t of a Traneportatiian Plan leap which relates collector street connecting S.W. Walnut Street and S.W. Gaarde Street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, and 12; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1a, 1.1.2, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 11.3.1, and 11.3.2; community Development Code Chapters 18.22 and 18.30. LOCATION: Northeast side of Bull Mountain `west. of SW 121st Avenii;e and SW Ga &rd© Street, south of Walnut Street, and east of SW 132nd Avonue. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied b various departments! end agenvieF,i and from other information available to our staff, a report and z ecommendatlon will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to cent on this application, we need your comments by Nov- 9, 1992,. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Xi you are un po ` v;: please phone the ►�taf f contact ow with your comments and confirm comments in writing as soon as able to ree nd by the gb� noted below y regarding a�:'d �.rrn ou possible. If you have an questions re ardin this matter, contact the Tig Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Ball Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223, PHONE: 839 -4171. STn CONTACT: Randy Woolev PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: W ha ve reviewed the proposal and have no objections to ita Pleafie contact � : of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting= Phone Numbers tig NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLE s ▪ ctn. JEPARTli�.iMl' Building Official /Brad R. City Recorder, Engineering /Chris D. Permits Coordinator/Viola G. • SPECIAL DISTRICTS Fire District (Pick-up box) Tigard Water District '—� 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin, Valley Water District 6501 SW 'Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS' Nash. Co. Land Use i Transp. 150 N. First Ave. rro, OR 97124 ent Curtis Kevin Martin Joann Rice - Scott King Free Eberle -- Make Borreson to' City of Beaverton PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 City of king City City Manager 15300 SW 116th Xing City, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego City Manager 380 SW A Lake Oswego, OR 97034 State Highway Division Bob Doran PO 'Box 254/2 Portland, OR 97225 -0.12 5 • SPECIAL AGENCIES General Telephone Russ Wells 12460 SW Main St. Tigard, OR 97223 NW Natural Gas Scott Palmer 220 NW Second Ave. Portland, OR 97209 TCI CableviCion of Oregon Mike 'Eallock' 3500 SW Bond St. Portland, OR 97201 Columbia Cable (Frank Stone) 14200 SW Brigadoon Ct Beaverton, OR 97005 STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics Div. (ODCrr) Engineer Board of Health Fish 4 Wildlife Parks & Recreation Div. Subdivir;ion Supervisor Dept. of Energy - Dept. Of Efvixon. Quality FEDERAL AGENCIES ;or : 'a,. of Engineers .._� Pout Office OTHER, Southern Pacific'Transportntion Company Forney,, PLS .. Project Engineer 800 Niet 6th Avenue, R. 32 nion Station Port and, OA 91.209 Barks ` Recreation Board Police Field Operations Scheel Dist No. 48 aBeap� ) Boot`, 200 Beaverton, m /075 School list. 237 (Tigard 13137 Si Pacific Hwy.' Ti ado OR 97223 BouJdaty 'Commission 320 SW Stark Room 530 Portland, OR 97204 2000 8ii 1st ave. Pcl eland OR 97201-5390 ELM (CPA•. only) 1/ / G' 1175 Court St. NE Sales, OR 97310- 0590 Other 4 C City of Durham City Manager 17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland Planning Director 1120 SW 5th Portland, OR 97204 V LidwienRahmann 9002 S8 McLoughlin Blvd. Milwaukie, OR 97222 Portland General, Bloc. Brian Moore •14655:, SW Old Scholia Fry. Beaverton, dR 97007' Metro Area Communications -"° Jason Hewitt Twin Oaks Technology Center 1815 NW 169th Place 5 -6020 Beaverton, OR 97606 -4886 US West Pete' Nelson 421 SW Oak St, Portland, OR 97204 DOClmtiI `"— Division of State Lands Ccnmerce Dept. - N.E. Park LCDC PUC Pie 'Marshall Other:- other MS4e 1.)L nolice • � 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE APPROVING, _ -_ '., AMENDMENT TO J !� TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION MAP BY .REPLACING THE NOTE ry 2 STUDY AREA WITH A PLAN TO EXTEND GAME P N M SW 121ST AVENUE CONNECT WITH WALNUT STREET FEET TO 400 FEET EAST OF SW 132ND AVENUE. WHEREAS, the request • Comprehensive Plan is to amend the Traci p p follows: s ortation Ma as folio 1) Replace the Note 2 study area with a plan to extend Gaai de Street west and north from 300 feet to 400 east Avenue feet e connect wth B�TG�lnut Street at a Point of SW 13 2nd Avenue. 2) Note: 2 shall be further revised to read "Direct driveway access shall be prohibited along Gaarde Street extension and roadway connections shall be kept to a minimum. The width of the street may be reduced below the standards for major collector streets where turn lanes are nS.it required." WHEREAS, Note 2 on the Comprehensive Plan TTansp rtation Nap, the Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) ana the Regional transportation Plan (RTP) indicate need for a road connection ' `,ndicate a between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street."' p the city WHEg2EAS, proposed future development necessitates determine the configuration of that connection now. WHEREAS, three options for the configuration of the road were developed: 1) Staf f developed an option through a series of public :aeetings in conjunction t . stud atain Transportation with the Northeast Bull Mount considered.:.. all ., in 1989 and 1990. The study Process study options which appeaz:ed to meet established, design standards and to be consistent with the intent of the UPAA. 2) NPO # 3 and NPO '# 7 each developed ernatiwe proposals which u both -resented to the City alt were bo p e _�► Council. and the Planning n at the Public hear oonzcu,ssid p hearings on CPA 92-0007. its Council y from a NPO #7 the, C w unc�a heard te5 rose � - .ve who stated the NPO #7 °pti nlwas less expensive than WHEREAS J re Presentative .. . gm r the star f option and would mitigate neighborhood se entation, ORDINANCE No. 93- i0 .. Page 1 let i•. (Li THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria as noted below. • The-relevant criteria in this case' are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 12 and Tigard comprehensift Plan policies 1.1.1 • a, 2.1.1, 8.1.1, 11.3.1, 11.3.2. The proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals based on the following findings: Goal 1, citizen Involvement, is met because the City has an adopted citizen involvement program which includes. review of land use applications by neighborhood panning organizations. In addition, the Planning Commission and the City Council Planning reviewed this proposal in public hearings for which the public was properly notified. 2 . Goal 2, Land use Planning, is met because the City has applied Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan all relevant ' Statewide Plane P requirements in review policies and Community Development Code re • rements i� re iew y coordinated of this proposal. _�Io�add eaffect d government units Plan with the plan potentially by soliciting comments on the ], p po sed amendment and ro ` considering any comments received. 3 Goal 12, Transportation, is met because the City has adopted policies related to improving the tra�nsportat,ion network and P • g coordination of transportation improvement with continue coot other involved agencies. The proposal is consistent with the City's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings 1. policy 1.1.1 a., requiring consistency with the Statewide satisfied because' the proposed amendment to the Com rehens ive p of the p ^Plan will the Statewide Planning' Goals City 's acknowledged Plan_w 2. Policy 2.141, requiring, an on going citizen involvement ro anam, is satisfied becaus e . 11e ig boncOo Planning Organizations #7 and #3 hav e be en .notitned of the hearing -and ''" _ 1 lic notice 'has been have.. commented. on thee: �,,coposal and a public ce of the :hearing. published including the mate, time and pla •g Ficient transportation . .. ied because amen 3 �� y sf and o� � o the Policy 8.1.1, requirin a safe work, is sa.ti Ma o laps `fairy safe and net , the r i Comprehensive Plan Transportation p p c ,.. ,.. efficient street and y ent and . ro adwa system tihat' meet. `cu.� iONDINANCE No. 9 3 -^ t . Page 2 1- . future needs. A safe and efficient transportation system is provided because ..... a' • This proposal' . is based on tale ' needs of the . Northeast .Bull Mountain area at : a future , time when the area . is fully developed in' accordanca :With .the }land uses designated in file comprel ensivet plan IN i E"' ♦r�N� , tM b ▪ This proposal Will ro suit in the safest and oaost efficient t roadway.. design with regard '; to steep grades, sight distance, at the connection to Walnut Street and the impact to existing steep driveways. ▪ Policy 11.3.1, regarding criteria for the review of plans for Gaar de Street or SW 121st' Avenue, is satisfied because in reaching its decision the City Council considered (a) the impacts on existing residential structures and the b� the ( alternatives available; effects o n traffic flow and the possible negative effects on other streets; and (c) potential use of the street by through traffic and determined: a • This proposal will interfere with fewer existing homes than the ,other proposals. b • This ' proposal wa.11 minimize 'impacts ` of through traffic on existing streets and will shift ;;through traffic more than the other options to new streets where subdivisions can be designed to accommodate this traffic. selecta.on of a roadway ' • e �aa reduce the ability of the c . owners of two existing homs may the proposed os Y g p P ed right -of -way to sell their property ert before it is needed for the street construction. pTheref re, the City should ways to • explore wa s purchase, properties in a'timely fashion. • Pol• 11o3 requiring coordination nation wt th other governments regarding street improvements in thy. corridor, is' satisfied this because an existing agreement amoni g a ...gar g Tigard, Beaverton and g y arterial Washington Count provides ford, connection west of Bull Mountain co protection of resiid residential p P g Gaarde arterial is neighborhoods on Gaarde Street extension until the completed. This proposal is consistent with the UPAA, the Washington County Transportation Plan, ,the Regional Transportation Plan (RAP) and the existing Comprehensive Plan. ORDINANCE Page 3 0. 93 id n r. w jai•,.,, .. ;Mr r .. Additionally, revising', read: _ "Direct driveway access shall be prohibited along Gaarde Street extension and roadway connections shall be kept: to a minimum. The width of the street may be reduced below the standards for major collector streets where turn lanes are not required." Adding Comprehensive Plan Transportation Nap Note 2 as shown in .Exhibit A. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By 14(4 itnit UI3 read of all Council members } and title 3 � being of A�% �..� er only, present of 5 day o 1993. !Yid Of1/1/14-f . _ .� , di y Recorder C y Attorne; [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] , NOTICE OF ADOPTIdN This for must be mailed to DLCD not later t han 5 working days after adoption ORS 197.615 and OAR Chapter 660, Division 18 See reverse side for submittal requirements Jurisdiction � ity - of ig.0 Local # CPA'92- 0007 Date of Adoption , March 23. 91 93 V_ _ Date Mailed August 1 95 Date the Proposed Notice was mailed to DLCD 10/92 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment _.._ Land Use Regulation Amendment New Land Use Regulation .X Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Zoning Map Amendment Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached." 1• • dl »11 -1•11-1 •. t *We '1'1 - , .1 r. • -1: • .. 10, •ii k - '••:1 -• P.1 1l -• • -s- mtsimingfitammatL12.1stAveautia ••i t1 e 411 -- Describe how the adopted amendment differs from the proposed amens d eat. If it is the same, write "Same. If you did not give notice of the proposed amendment, "N/A." City p Transportrtation Map bv� . ...: The Ci Council an�.�nds the Com rehen iy , Plau, �� 1. • U -1 .- $ Ill 5 9 32nd Avenue: 2:._�e• along Gaarde Street extension and rpadway connections shall � � otto a m�n�mu�n The i h 4 e 1 1. • :A gt and `north_. eet ate point 300 feet to 40 feet ipast of 1. . - a • !1 '. ,ited • 64. II-. is I. sue 1..,1 -1 Ill.', Sl- it -e` • 1 1 1 "xhibit A. Plan Map Change From _biota 2 to New . o. to 2 Zone Map Change From N /A. to N/A A Location. 111 1 ;A- I -14141 ['11 - A 1 II • 11 - 1 • Acres Involved: N /A' Specify Density: Previous Density' . New Density/A Applicable Goals: 1, 2 and, 12 was an Exception adopted' :.... "Yes;.. DLO]) File # DLCD Appeal Deadline Did DLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment 45 days prior to the final hearing? Yes No: _ The Statewide Planning Goals do not apply Emergency Circumstances Required Expedited Review Affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: : -4171_ Local Contact: Udine .Smith O�hone. �) X39 Address: • g7223_ SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ORS 197.615 and OAR Chapter 660, Division 18 . Send this Form and Two (2) Copies of the Adopted Amendment to: Department of Land Conservation and Development 1175 Court Street, N.E. Salem, Oregon 97310 -0590 • Submit Two (2) copies of adopted material, if copies are bound, please submit two (2) complete copies of documents and snaps. . Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than five (5) working days following the date of the final decision on the amendment. ▪ Submittal Adoption r� tust include the text of the amendment plus of this Notice of p adopted findings and supplementary information. L PP You this Notice of Adoption The deadline to a eal will be Mended if do� not submit this N` within five (5) working days of the final decision. Appeals to LIJBA may be filed within 21 day s of the date Notice of Adoption tion is sent to Y p DLCD. i In addition to sending Notice of Adoption to DLCD, you must notify persons who participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision you need more copies of this form, please. call the DLCD at 503 -373 -0 If . ou nee" or this form ma 503-373-0050 o be duplicated on green paper. UNITED STATES POSTAL, SERVICE First - Class; ilAail Postage & Fees Paid UsPS Permit No. G -10 Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in this box • CITY OF TIGARD City of Tigard Planning Division AJ: V/vm / 13125 SVU Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 CPA 91 -01, "CPA,92 -07; ZOA 92 -04;' ZOA 93 -01; CPA 93 -09; ZOA 93 -07; CPA 94 -02; CPA 94 -04; CPA 96 -01 CPA 96 -04; ZON 96 -06; CPA 94 -01; ZOA 97 -03; ZOA 97 -05 SENDER: , ■ complete items i and/or 2 for additional serVices, complete Items 3; 4a, and 4b. d» Pri t d dd " ss an the reverse of this form to that Micah return this cans to oU s}�ace s ill n yoyyur name an a re i Attach this form to the front of the. menlplece, or on the boot If doe" not � permit s Write 'Rehim Receipt Aequestedon the matlpiere below ttre article number, ?, 4• ■ The "Return Receipt will show to Whom the article Was delivered oriel the date -' delivered, 0 3, Article Addressed to 20. DEPT OF LAND CONSERVATION & DEV 8 1175 COURT STREET NE SALEM OR 97310 -0590 PTAA. 7-047n444 404f) 5. Received By: (Print Name) 6, Sigria : e; (Aa ad of /gent) PS Form 3811, December 1994 994 I also Wish to receive the following services (for an extra fee): i4 t3 Addressees Address 2, © Restricted Delivery j Consult postmaster for fee. 4a. Article Number 4b. Service Type Registered 0 Express Mail d Return Receipt for Merchandise 7i* Date of Delivery ® Certified ®'insured' C� COD. ra,t, 0. Addressee's Address (Only if requested and fee is paid) 162.595 -sa 3.0229 Domestic Return Receipt ► , n a y a US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail, K -! No Insurance Cove-114i Piovc ded. not use for International ma (See reerse) DEPT OF LAND CONSERVATION & DEV S ' 1 175 COURT STREET NE h n - SALEM OR 97310 -0590 Cep Fee' Spedti Denys Posbnadc or Gate COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF TIGARD, . OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA, . ITEM SCARY . , T'I'ED • .. � : ����,.� �.�.,�.. AGENDA OF: M c1 23.1993' ' °� �,� DAT : S�PJBNI ISSUE/A�''ENDA ' TITLE: end, xin� ote" 2 0 k PREVIOUS ACTION: Co � ens v s_ Dart t o l x a '' ' AM . PREPARED BY: Caro] rMM asm ._ --. DEPT HEAD OK � CITY ADMIN oK /V/ REQUESTED BY: woli -;-15_15. ISSUE 0 C Should the City amend the Comprehensi e Plan Transportation Map by replacing NOTE "2 study area with a defined p lan to connect Gaarde street with Walnt Street? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached ordinance which accepts the staff .option for a connection between Gaarde Street and Walnut Street;, INFORMATION SUMMARY. As a result of the Northeast Hull' Mountain Study, staff developed a proposal to extend Gaarde Street west and north from • SW 121 Avenue to connect with Walnut Street at a point 300 feet to 400 feet east of *SW 132 Avenue - connectidn would replace the Note 2 study area on the Comprehefsive Plan Transportation Map. NPO 3 and. NPO 7 each . developed alternative proposalsn effort to mitigate P , . r g in the neighborhood. The Pann. ti ate traffic impacts in an of f o issue to the Lit Council which Commission y edf the estaff option. on heard testimon and also heard testimony and selected 2 cn. the CoMprehensive Plan Transportation Hap, the Urban Planning Area p M• ., indicate � for a road ortation Plan. all indicate a need and the Regional Street • on between Wa taff option 'will ecti onal Transt and Gaarde street • The e .. ... �, reran efficient roadway-- minimize interfere with fewer result in the Saf e��st and most of f is � '�?- . P impacts . of through existing he mss than the other options .and will m mile traffic. Adopt the NPO 7 or +cl /GaarRpt .4, PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES ; NPO 3 option. NOTES CITY OF TIGARD OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 93- "AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION MAP BY REPLACING THE NOTE 2 STUDY AREA WITH A PLAN TO EXTEND GAARDE STREET WEST AND NORTH FROM SW 121ST AVENUE TO CONNECT WITH WALNUT STREET AT A POINT 300 FEET TO 400 FEET EAST OF SW 132ND AVENUE. WHEREAS the request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan'. . Transportation Map as follows: 1) Replace the Note 2 study area with a plan to extend Gaarde Street west and north from SW 121st Avenue to Connect with Walnut Street at a point 300 feet to 400 feet east of SW ` 13 2nd Avenue., Note 2 shall be further revised to read 01Direct driveway access shall be prohibited along Gaarde Street extension and roadway connections shall be kept to a minimum. The width of the street may be reduced below the standards for major collector streets where turn lanes are not required." WHEREAS, Note 2 on the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map, the Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA). and the Regional Transportation Plan (RIP) indicate a need for a road connection between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street. WHEREAS , p ro p osed future development necessitates the city determine the configuration of that connection now: WHEREAS, three options for the configuration of the road were developed: 1) Staff developed an option through a series of ;public Meetings in conjunction with the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation a study in 1989 and 1990. The study process considered all available options s appeared d to design standards and to be with the intent of the UPAA. NPO #3 and NPCP #7 each developed alternative proposals whic were bath Presented to the City council h .. and the Planning �Coa�isa�on at the public hearings on CPA 92-0007. representative Who stated the NPO a ? o tiori�was less from ensiveQtl r City y.. that mitigate #7 P ; .. ? rep option tigate neighborhood segnientati,on . staff. o ton- and would- �i ORDINANCE No. 93- Page 1 THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1: The Proposal' is consistent with all relevant criteria as noted below. The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2 , 12 and Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.1•. a , 2.1.1, 8 . 3.1,, 11.3.1, 11.3.2. The proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals based on the following findings: 1. Goal 1, Citizen ,Involvement, is met because the City has an adopted Citizen . m P � program includes review of land use a P lications bY n neighborhood planni gorganizations. In addition, the `Planning Commission and the City Council reviewed this proposal in public hearings for which the public . was properly notified. 2 . Goal 2, Land Use Planning, is met because the City has applied all relevant ,Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive:' Plan policies and Community Development Code requirements in review of • this proposal In addition, the City has its plan with the plans of potentially affected government units by soliciting comments on, the proposed amendment and considering any comments received. 3. Goal 'l-2t Transportation, is 'met because the City has adopted policies related to improving the transportation network and continuing coordination of transportation improvements with ot;ferinvolved agencies. The proposal is consistent with the City ,'s acknowledged Comprehensive �rehensive Plan based on the following f inding� p 1. Polic y .1.1 a., requiring consistency with the Statewide. Planning Goals, is satisfied because the proposed amendment to the Comprc� �h ensive Plan will not affect compliance of the City's acknowledged Plan with the Statewide Planning Goals. . .. �g . _ . going M���.chborlhood t nvolvemen 2 . Policy 2 . i 1, requiring an on o�.nc -� . g . ' satisfied because �N,. Planning program, , n satd #3 have been notified of the hearing and co Organizations? an P have commented on ..he. proposal and a public notice has been published including the date, time and place of the hearing- P lis 8.1.1, requiring a safe and effi cient transportation t networki is satisfied because ie p o osed am endment to the Transportation Nap plans for a safe and efficient street and , ansp road. Comprehensive Plan and' system that teets,icurrent and oR1D "INANCt No. .9 3 Page 2 r t future needs. A safe and efficient transportation system is provided because: . This proposal is based on the ne the Northeast Bull Mountain area at a .,future time '..when. the•.area is fully developed in accordance- Sri:. the 1a1 nd'. uses designated in the comprehensive plan. 0, This proposal. ,_will, result the safest and most efficient roadway design with regard to- steep grades, sight distance at the connection to Walnut Street and the impact to existing steep driveways. . Policy 11.3.1, regarding criteria for the review of plans for reaching in its � Avenue," is decision City Council satisfied because in SW 121st Ave Gaarde Street cr Y - considered (a) the impacts on exissta.n. residential structures sand the p g alternatives' available; (b) ;the. effects on traffic „flow and the -.possible negative effects on other streets; and (c) potential use of r the street by through traffic and determined: a. This proposal , will interfere with fewer existing homes than the other proposals. b. This proposal will minimize impacts of through traffic on existing streets and will shift through traffic more than the other options. to new streets where subdivisions can be designed to accommodate this traffic. c•. The selection of a' roadway may ma reduce the ability of the owners of two existing homes in proposed right -of -way' Y t is street • property �t s needed for the stre to sell their ro art before i ' construction. Therefore, the City should' explore ways to purchase these properties in a timely fashion. y ® e , requiring coordination with.. other governments : regarding streetimprovements in. this corridor, is satisfied because an existing agreement among, Tigard, Beaverton and Washington County provides for completion of an arterial protection P of residential al neighborhoods on Gaarde Street extension until the arterial is completed. is t y ro P proposal is consistent mt with the PA , the Washington County, Transportation plan t the Regional Transi;ortaton Plan (RTP) ` and the. existing Comprehensive Plan. ORDINANCE No. Page 3 I SECTION 2: The City :.Couzzcil her Plan TransportationMaj enmds e Comprehensive Replacing the Note 2 µstady- area with a .,plan to extend :Gaarde Street west and 'north from, SW l2ist; -Avenue ;, to connect with Walnu . Street, at a point .300 feet to;'.�400 feet east ' SW 132nd ►venu �' Additionally, revising Notev to, read: ”Direct driveway'` access shall roadway connections shall be along Gaarde Street extension .and .p g Y kept to a minimum. The width ; of y reduced ]below the standards for major' the street may be reduced collector streets where turn lanes are not required." s Adding Comprehensive Plan Ttansportation Map Note 3 as shown in Exhibit A. SECTION 3: PASSED: This 'ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. By vote of present after being �:1. members all Council p nab a¢ad by 1993.on�.y, this day , Catherine Wheatley, City Fecorder APPROVED: This day of , 1993. Gerald I2. Edwards, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Ptt /Gaarde.ORD 03/10/93 ORDINANCE` No Page 4 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] • y February 9, 1993 aro. City Council Re: C' rehensive Plan Amendment CPA 9 City of Tigard arr (NPO ' -�0 9 �' �P y T am 1 s. Rosemary Shrauger and i live at 1303C S. ;ti. 'Walnut streets, Tigard. ].f the Report Option is selected for the road to connect with Gaarre treet, I %di.n. lose the hcane in which I have lives for over thirty -one years. I would find it extremely difficult ' to relocate because I have a sraal]. dog kennel. I believe that hrs. Jill Link »,y neighbor who would also lose her home, has really stated the matter best. • I, agree with her 100% that it is morally wrong to take cut, established homes because of the impact caused by new homes. • It is grossly unfair that new residents can come in and enjoy new homes in ; this area hconvenient to ever yt,hin; : while we old timers are forced out. Please remember that until about a year ago there was vacant land right next door to wdshev bus ; rich could have been considered for this road but I dcn't recall that it both ,� e so considered. Wow it has been iSold and the new owner is alre tiy, constructing the first of several houses to be, built on this land.. ' These new hoes will be enjoyed in this prime area by newcomers aUle ilrs. Link and I will be forced: to ' leave if you choose the Report Option that, would 'take our hoses. You must remember that you are not dealing just with land and houses. Yc.0 are dealing with people's lives ''sna "homes ". We have paid many tax 'dollars while living in this prine , .area and should be given every possible consideration to protect our piece of the merican- Dream. Rio matter how much the governMent mi,:,ht be p - to spend to helo us relocate, it enl ' not 'be,' possible to preserve the z eroriec or replace the ideal 'location or the ''friends sun: good' neighbOrs tha e kil]lose in the process. Tire is as important as the financial part. At my age . cannot wait in limbo while it takes vears9 who knows how ,many, to go ahem: with the acyuistti on of land (our land) and the actual construction of this road project. n an effort to face what may be inevitable, ray i say that I would be willing to keep an open mind provided we are assured that we would be co�_pe ns4ted suff" cientl:, to fully cover relocation in a home on property of ou r choice that meets our requirements. I really do not wish to moire. I would prefer that you choose one of the other options for this . road that would not take anyone's home. •=tose,..arY Shrau er e .. H o1d' .H • i '� � s:rauger 30 . 4.7,i7:N'Al"alnut" Street �.. Tigard, Oregon 9/23-'1711 . i••• COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 9_I 1993 DAT E SUBMITTED: J anuary 28. 1993 /AGENDA TITLE: Gaarde Street PREVIOUS ACTION TSSL1�; � -- Extension CPA 92 -0007 DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN 0 PREPARED BY: City Engineer REQUESTED BY ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map to define the alignment of the future extension of Gaarde Street west of SW 121st Avenue. STAFF COMMENDATION Amendment of the Transportation Map to adopt the "Report Option" alignment and associated language as recommended on page 7 of Exhibit A. Direct staff prepare ings to re are the ordinance and. find. INFORMATION SUMMARY On January 4, 1993, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposed Transportation Map amendment. Exhibit A is the staff report to the Planning Commission, containing background on the options being considered. Exhibit B is the minutes of the Planning Commission hearing. At the Planning Commission hearing, Cal Woolery of NPO #7 suggested a new option for the roadway alignment. After considerable discussion, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the option proposed by Cal Woolery Subsequently, at their regular January meeting, NPO #7 reviewed the option e y Mr. y p Exhibit C is sugg sted b Mr Woolery anti.. voted to recommend that o tion Exh g y the minutes of the NPO #7 meeting. Exhibit D is a letter from Cal Wooler clarifying Proposal. ro A ,sal. Based on, Cal Woolery's the new option P ry° s t�lari�ying letter, staff have reviewed ar the two and prepared a brief anal sis of how this option co. Zewe a p p y es with th options previously presented. The staff analysis is Exhibit E. is scheduled to meet jointly with NPO #7 on February 3rd to consider new recommendation ,from3N W NPO #3 is s �+ the option pp .ed by NPO #7. Any a NPO #3 be Presented natu the rFebruary 9th Council hearing At the Planning Commission hearing, there was some discussion of applicable policies. �� F o �Ex 1. �. throu h � .. � . 3 mDre Attache h3�b�t F) for Council consideration eratian Comprehensive Plan. a1�.ci are copies of ' p Co '�ensa.ve Plan policies 8. T ransportation) and 11 3.1 through 3.2 (Spec .PROPOSED al' Areas ,;'of Concern' for NPO ALTERNATIVES i . Select one of the options . presented and direct staff to prepare the appropriate ordinance and findings. The ordinance would be brought back at a subsequent meeting for Council review and adoption.. 2. Direct that a new study be performed to identify additional options, as recommended by NPO #3. Discussion would be needed regarding the scope of the new study, and funding for the study. 3 Leave the Transportation Map unchanged. A study area would then remain on the map and it would be necessary to try to resolve the roadway alignment. on a piecemeal' basis as development plans are submitted within the study area. In the paste, the NPOs and the Planning Commission have expressed P discomfort with ; this process . rw /note2cc FISCAL NOTES ibis A: Staff . report to Planning Commission Exhibit B: Planning Commission minutes of Januar 1993 Exhibit C: NPO #7 minutes of January 6, 1993 Exhibit D: Cal Woolery letter of January 7, 1993 Exhibit E: Staff analysis of NPO #7 option Exhibit F: Comprehensive Plan Policies 8.1.1-8.1.3 and. 11.3.1- 11 3.2. 1310111311C A AGENDA ITEM 5.2 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Planning Commission December 24, 1992 FROM: Randy Wooley, City Engineer SUBJECT: Gaarde Street Extension CPA 92-0007 Currently, the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map includes a study area referenced to Note 2 Note 2 indicates that two options are under consideration for a future extension of Gaarde Street west of 121st Avenue. The proposed Plan amendment would select one of the two options and amend the Transportation Map to show thew, selected option, Attached describing the two options in ed ale In the report, the options s l are described as more detail. � the "Report Option" and the "NPO Option" Comments have been received from various agencies and citizen groups as follows A�re a �reg onDepartment of Transportation ( ODOT) has indicated d tha ODOT Preference has no reference on the options but encourages the City to complete the selection of an option. Washington County planning staff have reviewed the report and provided detailed comments in a letter dated November 10, 1992. . A copy of the letter is attached. County supports the Report Option. The Transportation Advisory Committee reviewed the options at their regular meeting of November 12, 1992, - and voted` to recommend the Report Option. Tigard Police have indicated either option g a.cated no ob `ectnn to NPO #3 and NPO #7 reviewed the options in a joint meeting held on December 21 1992. At the end of the meeting, both NPOs voted to reject both Options and requested that another o tion . ked which option, t e + f be developed. when a.a,w.,. p y wUUld prefer 1 they had to choose between the two options under consideration, the NPOs took another vote and both NPOs indicated y preferred the NPO ii that if they had to choose they p� Option. It is now appropriate for th e Planning Commission o make a recomm endation to the City Council. Staff recommendation is shown on Page 7 of the attached report. r• October 1992 Requested Revision to the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map GAARDE STREET EXTENSION Proposal Currently, the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map includes a study area referenced to Note 2. Note 2 indicat s that two options are under consideration for a future connection between the Waenuiu132nd intersection and the Gaarde/121 st intersection. It is proposed to select one of the two options under consideration and to amend the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map to reflect the option chosen. History In 1983, the City of Tigard and Washington County both adopted comprehensive plans that called for a future extension of Murray Boulevard to connect with the intersection of Walnut Street and 135th Avenue. Both plans also called for future connections between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street in the area west of 121st Avenue. No specific alignments were indicated. In 1986, Washington County entered into urban planning area agreements with the cities of Beaverton and Tigard. The agreements indicated that the extension of Murray Boulevard would be designated as a collecior street and provided a drawing showing the alignment between Old Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. In addition, the agreements stated that an alignment would be developed for a collector street between the 135th Avenue/Walnut Street and the 121st Avenue /Gaarde Street intersections. The agreements established design standards for the road. In 1989, the City began its Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study, intended to y g. 1p define the future collector street system for the area. Following several public meetings, including hearings before the Planning ` g ing Commission and the City Council, most of the recommendations of the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study Report were adopted i p in April of 1990. However, the recommendations regarding the connection between 135th/VValnut and 121 st/Gaarde intersection were not adopted; at the close of the hearings, two options remained under consideration. In addition, the Council had requests uests that the urban planning a- rea agreements ents be amended to de e to the Mu rr a y Boulevard connection between Old Schells Perry Road and Walnut Street due to ET EXTENSION - October 19 GAARDE STRE 92 Page • concerns about through traffic. Selection of the preferred option for the Walnut- Gaarde :f connection was deferred pending a decision on whether the urban planning area agreement would be modified. jurisdictions, there was not support for amending In subsequent 1 subs unsdi uent discussions with other the urban planning area agreements. However, there was support for an agreement on the timing of the proposed ` Murray Boulevard extension. As a result, an agreement was drafted that assures that the Murray Boulevard extension between Scholls Ferry Road and Old Scholls Ferry Road shall not be opened to through traffic prior to the completion of other road improvements on the west side of Bull Mountain as provided in the County's Transportation Plan. The agreement is intended to discou rage the development • of the Murray Boulevard extension as a route for through traffic. The agreement has been approved by Washington County and the cities of Beaverton and Tigard; the agreement was signed in January 1992. When Tigard's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map was updated in 1991, a study area was added to indicate the two options still being considered for the collector street connection between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street. The study area is known as "Note 2 ". A copy of the map is included as Attachment #1. It is now proposed that the process be completed by adopting one of the options for a collector street connection between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street. Report Option The 1990 recommendation of the City staff was contained in Figure 12 -1 of the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study Report. (See Attachment #2.) Under this plan, j west and north from 121st Gaarde Street would be extended as a major collector. street wes Avenue to connect to Walnut Street at a location 300 feet to 400 feet east of existing 132nd Avenue. In addition, the Report recommended that side street access to the major collector be restricted, that direct driveway access be prohibited, and that reduced design widths be considered between access points. This option will be referred to as the Report Option. NPO Option The Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO #3) recommended that Gaarde Street be extended west from 121st as a minor collector, connecting `to 1 32nd Avenue. The NPO Th NP recommended that the street be designed for a speed of 25 mph. Linder this option, ro i g pr collector street connection between Gaarde and existing 132n tl Avenue would provide the calls w Walnut Streets. I subdivision along the , ..... Avenue 991 a preliminary • lot was P �p In 1,. ns�on west of the - a rdejt 21 s. nteect�on. Dn the hearings on the proposed exte G a 21st to During 9 p p GAARDE STREET EXTENSION - October 1992 Page 2 subdivision, there was substantial discussion of whether the subdivision 'should provide for the westward extension of Gaarde. as proposed by the NPO. After reviewing alternatives submitted by the applicant, the. Planning Cornrnission voted to approve a preliminary subdivision layout that did not directly provide for the l 3aarde extension to 132nd. (Commission members were - persuaded that the site was not suitable for � vim,. '°"' construcdon of an east -west collector street due to steep grades. Evidence was provided that a (collector connection to 132nd Avenue could better be provided north of the site where grades are less steep. On appeal, the Planning Commission's decision was upheld by the City Council in Resolution 91 -75. Consequently, the NPO Option represented in Attachment #3 shows Gaarde extended west and north from 121st to intersect 1 32nd at a location near Benchview Terrace (north of the approved subdivision site). T omearisons. In conjunction with the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study, future traffic volumes on the collector street system were forecast. The forecasts assumed full development of the area, based on maximum practical development under existing zoning and recognizing the development restrictions of steep slopes, drainageways and existing subdivisions. Based on these forecasts, Appendix E in the Northeast Bull Mountain Study Report contains material on future street capacities. Appendix E indicates that the collector street system designed to typical City of Tigard standards will provide acceptable levels of service under projected future traffic volumes, except at a few intersections. Additional' traffic lanes may be needed in the future at some intersections. These intersections are along the Walnut/Murray connector from 135th to Scholls Ferry Road; along Gaarde Street near Highway 99W; and possibly at the intersection of 121st and Walnut. The information in Appendix E assumed that the Report Option Wouil be adopted. Selection of the NPO Option would not change.the general conclusion: stated above. However, selection of the NPO Option would change traffic projections on some streets,' as discussed below. All discussion is based on work done in 1990 in conjunction with the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Stud,. Copies of the 1990 Study Report are available for review in the City Engineering "r Department. The NPO Option would reduce the future traffic on Gaarde Street. West of 121st Avenue, the 'build-out traffic underthe NPO Option would be approximately 5,000 vehicles per day, compared to 10,000 vehicles per day under the Report Option. Under either option, the projected volumes exceed the guidelines for a minor collector street and fall within the volumes typical for a major collector. A two- lane street with a center turn lane at intersections would be adequate under either option GAARDE STREET EXTENSION October 1992 . �' s 1: F• V �� .V M G Page 3 ry w On Gaarde Street near Highway 99W, the NPO Option races projected traffic volumes by approximately 20%. The need for future additional turn lanes would be delayed but the long -term facility requirements would be generally the same as forthe Report Option. On Walnut Street near 135th, the NPO Option reduces projected build-out traffic volumes from approximately 16,000 vehicles per day under the Report Option to approximately 10,000 vehicles per day under the .14P0 Option. Any need for additional future lanes at the 135th intere ctions would probably be eliminated under the NPO Option. Option would divert to ether routes. . NPO ® n wou Traffic removed from Gaarde Street under the N Impacts would be most noticeable south of Walnut Street on . 1 32nd Avenue and 121st . Avenue. Under the Report Option, 132nd would remain a local street between Walnut i Option, become a collector street with a and Benchview. Under the NPO O to ®n, 132nd would projected traffic volume of 4,000 vehicles per day. On 121st between Walnut and Gaarde, the projected traffic under the NPO Option is roughly twice the projected traffic under the Re on Option. P P, When compared to the Report Option, the NPO Option is projected to increase future traffic volumes on 121st north of Walnut by approximately 17% and on Bull Mountain Road west of the 135th extension by approximately 29%. Smaller increases could be expected on othercollector streets including the 135th extension south of Walnut, North Dakota Street, Bull Mountain Road east of the 135th extension,-and.the .future Sunrise Lane connection. These traffic comparisons are summarized in Attachment No. 4. Land -Use Impacts In general, both opi►ons are located through currently undeveloped property. The roadways would be constructed as new subdivisions are developed in the area. Roadway alignments and grades would be coordinated with the design of the new subdivisions. An exception in the Report Option is the area immediately south of Walnut Street. To complete the connection to Walnut, it is likely that the City would eventually need to acquire and remove two existing homes. An exception in the NPO Option is the area along existing 132nd Avenue south of Walnut Street. The existing street is narrow and has no sidewalks. Several of the existing homes have very steep driveways. Widening this portion of 132nd to c .►llector standards or adding sidewalks would require major reconstruction of driveways. In some cases, it might be necessary to abandon vehicle accesses to existing garages. Major retaining walls would be necessary in some locations. GAARDE L . E STREPT )(TENSION October 1992 Page 4 C e. 1' Coordination with Other Plans State regulations require that comprehensive plans be coordinated with those of adjoining jurisdictions. The existing Regional Transportation Plan, the Washington County ng Transportation Plan, and the urban planning area agreements reernenis inrith the County and the City of Beaverton all call for a collector street connection between 135th/Walnut and 121 st/Gaarde intersection. To satisfy State regulations, Tigard must either adopt a plan consistent with these other existing plans or persuade the other jurisdictions to amend their plans. When the other plans were adopted, it was envisioned that the connection between Wainut and Gaarde would be a direct extension of Murray Boulevard It could be argued that neither of the options currently under consideration precisely complies this neither p ly corgi lees �veth th s concept. However, the Report Option 'is 'more closely in compliance than the NP ° � � p NPO Option. Operationally, the Report Option shows little difference from the previously planned concept. Its route is ` only slightly different from those considered when the comprehensive plans were adopted. During the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study, this route was selected and the direct- connection routes were rejected in order to minimize impacts on existing development From previous discussions with County staff, it appears that this option is sufficiently in conformance with existing plans to be considered in compliance. It appears that adoption of the Report Option would not require amendment of the other existing plans. The NPO Option deviates further from the direct - connection concept. As proposed by the NPO, this option would not comply with the design standards adopted in the urban planning area agreements. If this option is selected, it appears that Tigard would need to request corresponding amendments in the other plans and agreements prior to adopting the plan. Timinq_and Fundino Whichever option is chosen, it is anticipated that the innprov ents will be made as development of the area occurs. Each subdivision would construct its piece of the roadway as part of the subdivision improvements. The countywide TIF (Traffic Impact Fee) ordinance provides for TIF credits to developers who construct portions of this roadway connection. The TIF credits would apply to all of the Report Option route; it is not clear which portions, if any, of the NPO Option route would qualify for the TIF credits. The area immediately adjacent to Walnut Street is already developed and is unlikely to experience substantial redevelop me nt within the next 20 years. In this area the collector street improvements would likely need to be completed by the City. Under the Report Option, TIF funds could be used be used to complete the collector street. It is not clear OAARD.E STREET EXTENSION _October 992 l Page 5 if TIF funds could be used to upgrade existing 132nd Avenue to collector standards under the NPO Option. • Preliminary cost estimates indicate that the NPO Option would be more expensive than ion to, construct. Because r steep the Report �p� \ ,, >e the. NPO Option would traverse more terrain, ft would i quire more earthwork than the Report Option. !l4 �dening of existing 13 2nd a require. extensive earthwork, construction of Avenue to collector standards would . retaining wads, right of way acquisition, and recenstructi6n of existing driveways. It is estimated 014 the improvements requiring City funding would. cost approximately $150,000 to $200,000 more under the ,NPO Option. - Since construction is tied to private development of subdivisions, the. schedule of actual - - construction is not known. If necessary, the City could eventually complete any missing sections of the roadway and recover the costs from developers as the remaining land is developed. Exact Alignments The Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map describes street alignments in general terms. Precise roadway alignments are usually determined at the time of actual development. The precise alignment is typically based on more detailed engineering and the needs of the specific developments that are proposed. Therefore, the proposed options describe only the approximate alignment of the future streets. When specific development proposals are considered, there is ` additional opportunity for public review and comment on the specific alignments. Under either option, the projected future traffic volumes are within the range associated with major collector streets in Tigard (1,500 to 10,000 vehicles per day). In either option, it is recommended that major collector standards should apply. The Report Option can more easily meet the collector standards as it follows a route with more gentle grades. The NPO Option would traverse a steep rugged area east of 132nd and would require steeper grades. Existing grades on 132nd Avenue exceed collector street standards. Discussion First review may suggest that the NPO Option is more desirable as it has lower projected future traffic volumes on the Gaarde extension. However, further review shows that 121 the NPO Option traffic will be diverted to other existing collector streets such as t 132nd and Bull Mountain Road. These existing streets are already substantially ur developed as low density residential areas and are not well planned for high traffic volumes. We conclude that it is preferable to carry more of the future traffic increase on the new .roadway where new subdivisions can be This appropriately designed to accommodate I e the greater traffic volume. way, the increased traffic resulting from new development CAARDE STREET EXTEN ION - October 199 Page Amy I to a greater extent,-be routed to the %IOW `to the existing streets. Therefore, weft on for the routing of traffic. y new, clever art Option is rnent, ,rstner 0;: prnferle Vlre also find that the Report Option Is a better route in that .it. will have more gentle grades, .has fewer impacts to existing residential propet s and avoids the need to reconstruct existing 132nd Avenue south of Walnut. . nally, we find that the Report Option is in co o p with existing regional and total gVans. We are not optimistic that the amendments to existing plans could be obtained to gyring the NPO Option into cornpliance ecorrnendations It'is recornmended that the Note 2 study area on the Comprehensive Han Transportation Map be replaced by the Report Option alignment As depicted in Attachment #2.' In addition, it is recommended that Note 2 be revised to naad as follows: "Gaarde Street to be extended west and north from 121st Avenue to connect with Walnut Street at a point 300 feet t ®400' feet east of SW 132nd Avenue. [direct driveway access shall be prohibited along the Gaarde Street extension and roadway connections shall be kept to a mininYum. The width may be reduced below standards for major c lle+ctor streets where turn lanes are not required." rw /note2 GAO STREET EXTE'I SIQN t ctober 1:992 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] miaow , )2 1OR COLLECTOR MliTOR COLLECTOR , LOCAL STREET APPROXIMATE i.L GN T (Exact alit to be v .determined at time of L C development. TRAFFIC SIGH (When Warranted) E MONO Carsidor location 300° 400• eist of 132nd "►teau at Walnut St. Bull Mountain Ad. intersection approximately 300 vest of 126th Avre. Iy S. I31st 'Ye. .+rw ,, ,la 5. AL MAJOR CO LTMetoit lQNOR COLi.BCR ,LOG11L szszET =GYM= NT 1E,xact alignment to be deterad ied at time of oevelogment.. TPJ PFXC SIGNJL (When Warranted) Ave. Projected traffic under NPO Option .....� compared to Report Option. riumbers below 100% indicate that MO Option would have less traffic than Report Option. umbers over 100% indicate that NPO Option would have, more traffic than Report Option. • Sunrise ln• wft • WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON CEIVE NOV 121 CITY OF "TIGARD November 10, 1992 Randy Wooley, City Engineer City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Randy: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Proposed amendment to Tigard ° s Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. Per your• request, we ha ve focused our comments on the Gaarde.Road extension and the consistency issues relative to the Washington County Transportation Plan and the Urban Planning Area Agreement between Tigard and the County. Our comments follow: Consistency with the Washington Count Transportation Plan The Gaarde Street extension is a proposed collector on the County's Transportation Plan. The City and County plans are consistent with regard to functional classifications. The Gaarde Street extension is not included as part of the Countywide `Road System and therefore is not a road that the County ex p ects to have jurisdiction over. On the basis of functional classification and the. Countywide Road System, both the Report Option and the NPO Option would appear consistent with the Washington County Transportation Plan. However, the Report Option would appear to be more consistent with the Transportation Plan. In particular, the Report Option is more consistent with Policy 2.0 which seeks the greatest efficiency of movement possible for Washington County residents and businesses, in terms of ` travel time and distance. Consistency with the Urban Planning Area Agreement between Tigard and the County The Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study indicated that even with construction of the Western Bypass and the extension of Beef Bend Road south to Six • ; some through the Six Corners, there will be a demand for some non -local trips thr g the south Beaverton area.. While ethe Gaarde area between south T�,and and thecal' trips, it's e Street Extension will primarily serve local important designed . some non -local traffic.. As ' p nt that the street be des ned to serve s rban Planning anni n� Area Agreement the design the Gaarde not g g design speed 35 miles er hour and access shall be limited: It would appear that a Project compatible with the Report Option could be developed consistent with this design standard. 10600 night of Land We and Transporiation;'Planning I3iVisicm ' Pitono. 5tY� i 6.411151 - i55 north First Avenue Hillsboro, Croon 97124: % 50 i$04141' 1 Candy Wool ey lovember 10, 1992 age 2 with regard to the NPO Option, as noted' in the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation . Study and In . the Staff Report ,for.;the 6aarde Extension , 132nd .. Avenue near Walnut Street ,is an existing, n street with no sidewalks, and `pry' steep driveway accesses to .- existing h s on, both sides Of the street. The street is currently not implhovedto collector, street standards. Improvements to this street consistent with the design provisions in the Uktan Planning Area Agreement would have major impacts on the existing homes and accesses. Therefore, 132nd Avenue would not appear suitable for 'a collector roadway. Ado'htionally, the NPO Option would traverse a steep rugged area east of, .' 132nd and would require rather steep ' grades . , Thus, it seems infeasible that a" project compatible with the NPO Option could be designed and built that would lie consistent with the access limitation and the 35 agile per hour design standard contained in the Urban Planning Area Agreement. Conclusion We concur with Tigard staff that it is preferable to carry more of the future Northeast Bull Mountain Area traffic on a new road where new subdivisions and access points can be appropriately designed to accommodate the traffic volumes. pp to adopt the Report Option We su ort staff alignment. s recommendation � on We request that you keep us informed of any new alternatives and any City of Tigard decisions regarding this issue. Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment. rely, t Curtis nning Manager 6atde lonV M' w� a,e • l IDan:bYT S TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION . REGULAR TING ®, JANUARY 4, 1993 TO ®R CALL TO meeting to order aORDER: President called t 7:30 PFD. The eeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center TOE HALL 13125 SW Hall Boulevard. • ROLL CALL: Present: President re • Commissioners Boone, ® Castile Holland, ire, Saporta, Saxton (arrived 7 :35), Schwab, and Schweitz. Staff: City Engineer Randy Wooley, Senior Planner Dick Bewersdorff, Associate Planner Jerry Offer, and Planning Commission Secretary Ellen Fox. President Pyre welcomed the new commissioners Holland and Schweitz to the Commission. Comanis s inner Schwab invited commissioners to attend the upcoming public meeting to discuss the possibil.itY of converting the soon-to-be vacated Fire Station into a onununity center. He said the proposal includes asking the voters to approve financing by general obligation bonds.,` APPR s • OF MINUTES The wi nut - for the December i►,eeti ng were not n 1uded in the packets for : •proval and will be approved at„the next nmeeti.ng. N COMMUNICATIONS c PLANNING COMMIS There were not commune ations recei ed regarding this meetin . X SITE DEVELOPMENT ENT REVIEW ,S rR 4• 0018 l[\i1SeP6DeGs ( � � #3) 3 ) An appeal of the Director" decision approving a site Development Review request to co struct a new drive -thru only restaurant f ac ' * and a Tot it. w�.•th related s improvements an e Line Ad)ustment rto adiust two parcels f approximately 58414 p is of apPro�txmately and l l , 7 6 1 square feet into two arc 42,232 4ndl 22, 672 square feet 'each, The g, eal has been made Plannin Oran Cation, NPO # Tho . Pie req uestst that the Director's condition of a Leval l7 b g g �3 �1P61 a al modified to require an enforceable restriction ainst left . PUBLIC HEARING ' LANNING COM ISSIGN MINUTES i1F° I JANUARY 4, 1993 PAGE 1 11 It end Condition 17 ch would be Si majority v =• Moore, Schweit 1 to re . ®f fici� City "No Left Tun enforceable' by police. Lotion carried hy ..� �� � =" eioners present w th Commissioners �.� Ho = "nay. RECESS 9 :05 RECONVENE -- 9:15 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PIS AMENDMENT CPA 92.m0007 CITY OF TIMM (NPO #3) A proposal to amend the Transportation Plan Map relating to the future alignment- of a collector street connecting SW. Walnut Street and S. W. Gaarde Street APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2e 5, and 12; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1..la, 1.1.2, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 11.3.1, and 11.3.2; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22 and 18.30. LOCATION: Northeast side of Bull Mountain west of SW 121st Avenue and SW Gaarde Street, south of Walnut Street, and east of SW 132nd Avenue. City Engineer Randy Wooley explained the Transportation Plan amendment and referred to the wall map to show the subject . area. He explained Note 2 which is a study area. He described the two alternatives which were being considered. Alternative I was called the "report option" since it came about following ' the 1990 Bull Mountain Report. Alternative 2 was called the "NPO Option" because NPO #3 has proposed this option. City Engineer compared projected traffic for both options, as well as feasibility. He noted that 132nd is narrow with steep grades, making Alternative 2 a less feasible option. He recommended adopting the Report Option because is provides a better route with less steep grades and would have fewer impacts on existing neighborhoods. PUBLIC 'TESTIMONY Ca Herman Porter, 11875 SW Gaarde, handed out NPO 3 minutes (Exhibit C) and stated that both NPO 3 and 7 support the Alternative 2, the NPO Option. He discussed the daily tratfic volumes on Gaarde Street- He voice concern about ending up with too high of volumes. He was not in favor` of turning Gaarde into an arterial, or an alternate route to I-5 He voiced acceptance for a collector but not an arterial. o Cal Woolery, 12356 SW 132nd Ct., discussed the area between Walnut and Hampton. He favored developing another option. Which, would join at 132nd from 150th south of Walnut. He PLANNING COMRISSION MINUTES ANUARY 4, 1993 PAGE 5°, : 4 iP 0 • advised this option would not displace Blouses- Be described p • on of Report Optioa�n and the NPO 3 Option. He this optima ,u a combination p how his Plank would look. explained Il discussed ssed ne SimPact on developments and talked about ways to deter some of ,the through - traffic and to relieve some of the traffic , on 'Walnut. OPPONENTS o Rosemary Shraugere 13030.:SW Walnut St. a advised that if Report option is selected, it" will take her home. She read a Prepared statement (Exhibit D). She said it would be difficult for her to relocate and still have the ideal situation she has now for her dog kennel. o Harold Shrauger, 13030 SW Walnut St , voiced his agreement with the previous speaker. o Jill Link, 13050 SW Walnut, noted that the new developments have caused the impacts. She said it is iaorally wrong to take out established homes because of the impacts caused by new homes. She also commented that there needs to be a better method for communicating - with neighborhoods regarding meetings, as she did not receive any notice of this hearing. o Paul Heav rland, 8685 SW McDonald, talked about the Westside By -Pass meetings and recommended more discussions between cities to help facilitate the transportation plans. He favored gathering input from communities and working together better. o William S. Hegge, 9965 SW McDonald St. , voiced his concern about the traffic volumes on minor collectors. He suggested determining whether the purpose is to serve - neighborhoods or more regional and built to that purpose. He preferred NPO Option because is provides a series of minor collectors. Ho was not convinced that the two options being discussed were the two best options . o James Shelton, 12015 SW Gaarde, discussed the impact of the NPO Option. He was concerned about increasing traffic on Gaarde and suggested that it be widened. He noted that the traffic situation at the intersection of 99W and Gaarde is worse than before the realignment because of stacicarng Problems and people running the light. o Lavelle Helm, 13280 SW Walnut, said she has been fighting the. Murray E2ctension plan for years, and she sees this plan proposed is the beginning of that extension. PI ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 4, 1993 PAGE 6 ha• Bruce Anderson, 11205 SW Garde, expressed concern about the He said the Report Option a°e a traffic aarde Street. po on Gaarde. He .pre cerred • suggested the NPO plan, but he ggestednot P.rcomjp�teti.ng this � mail a arterial by-pass is completed. o Dave Leary, 10020 SW Johnson St. spoke on behalf of his othe3. who lives on Walnut. He agreed with the previous epeakck ?rs . He asked the Commission to consider the impact on people, especially long - tame residents: "Take care of the people who have built Tigard." o Rod Silver, 11333 SV1 Gaarde , sp@ke in favor of the NPO plan. REBUTTAL • o City Engineer answered questions which had been raised concerning grades and relocating peoplo. He provided . statistics regarding traffic volumes in areas of concern and discussed how the two options ould affect these volumes. Discussion followed regarding the two options and the newer one presented by fir. Woolery. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Boone favored the NPO 7 plan because he said it eliminates two connections to walnut that are too close. Commissioner klolla.nd discussed the need to look at long-range needs and how t`o get traffic through the area more efficiently and quickly. He favored the Report option recommended by staff. Commissioner Saxton agreed with Commissioner Boone and favored the slightly modified Report option as suggested by NPO Commissioner po favored g po Option-- and said h e wonl consider the NPO option. He discussed the transportation problems in Tigard and preferred not to delay a decision President Pyre discussed the need for Weestside By-Pass and the inter- regional traffic problems. He was concerned about making decisions e detrimental to the neighborhoods. He ferreddacoura discouraging through traffic; as well as being clear about whether it is an arterial or a collector we want. o Commissioner Schweitz did not agree. He favored looking at PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES aANUART 4 ; 1993 PAGE 7 NPO . 7 Option further before making a determination. Comaissioner Schwab said he agreed withr Co mEisssioner Puce that traffic should be diffuses ash much as possible, and that he did not want to see the.., new route used as a race track to the freeway. Commissioner h oner Boone said he would support the Report Option if modi.f .ed as to its connection to Walnuts Commissioner Boone moved and Commissioner Schweitz seconded to recommend to City Council to select the Report Option modified as per O 7's suggestion. Notion passed by majority of Commissioners present: 5 yes, 2 no, and 2 abstentions. Co Holland and a voted ,Na Commissioners Moore gand Castile abstained. 5.3 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 92 0005 FRONT YARD S PROPOSAL TO AMEND SECTION 18.96.060 (a) of the Cify of T and Community Development Code to allow the s rage of boa s, trailers, campers, camper bodies, hops trailers, reors, . tion vehicles, or commercial vehicles i access of 3/4 ton cap ,:,city to be stored in a required fron and setback in a subject i llowi limitations: 1) . No parkin .ain� visual clearance the area; use for sleeping purposes 1' -ted to 14 days per calen year; 3) such units hall be liven d and kept in mobile ondition. Senior Planner Dim Bewersdorff ave the staff report, stating . ,' safety P o in aesthetics. He say. • :that, tat f in, safet issues than the Council is more inters er'� ,�s was recommending that the Commission repeal that ec` .ion of the code. PUBLIC TESTIMONY OPPOSITION o Bill Gross, 110 ....: 35 SW 135th B spoke on behalf of BP© 7. kte discussed pant meeting of August 1991. He said NPO rejected C P � � they were often & Rs to protect ho�neo��ne asp th , voiced concern about protecting home values. a.neffect� e. He voice He talked about the code which City of Portland has to protect homeowners. PROPONE;, o ,Rick Perkins, 11740 SW 114th Pl., Tigard, said he live on a M / cul, de sac. He discussed a trailer which he has maintained in his front yard and described his site. Ile favored the repel PLANNING COMMISSION ]M aNOTES - �,1'.ANi'ARY 4, 1993 '' PAGE 8 AI lid N ...� Bill Gross ,I 11035 SU 1 35th Ti rd. OR 97223 Tel: 5 24- 6325 January 6, 1993 Liz Hewton Tigard Connunity Development 13125 SU Hall Tigarda OR 97223 Tel 639-4171 Fax: 684-7297 RE ; NPD *7 MEETING; UEDNESDAY. JANUARY . 6, 1 993 -7 MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7 PM. ROLL CALL Present: Uoolery, Blanchard. Gross, 'Houden, McGlinchye Excused. Dorsett. Absent: Cunningham. RPPROUED MINUTES. PROM', DECEMBER 2 1992 MEETING AS READ. UELCOME TO GUESTS Chairman Lloolery welcomed to our meeting: Scott Russell',, landowner in the Scholls retry and Murray area; Larry Uesterman and,, Gary Steele, har eoa ners on Fern Street; John Hong, homeowner in the ` Cotswold Subdivision; Steve Dunlop,' on behalf of Matrix Development and Castle Hills. Subdivision. Bill Hegge, homeowner on McDonald Street. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION: CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL Our HPO convened with HPO #3 to hear a presentation from Counci %or Judy Tessler and Community Coordinator Liz Newton on a proposal to disband the seven existing NPO''s and replace: them with three or four Community Involvement. Teams CCIT''s). Mehber°s, voiced concerns about the CIT'"s concept: Each CIT would 1) (Encompass too many` neighborhoods fore volunteers` to ;represent; 2? Involve too many ,neighborhoods and .issues for volunteers, tiro handle 3) Involve too few vol.unt�eers familiar +with any one neighborhood; and 9) (Lessen n ighborrhoodl and' as a result co munity , participation, e. e e-o w a u IM b ti �.,. tler+abers cbserued the NPO ®s concept ial sounds but the implementation of the: !IPO'5 exi rtin9 charter needs: 121 Mora City resources available to NPO uoluuteers; 2) teloere training for BAP® volunteer S; and 3) City boards cross-membership by NPO volunteers. 61ertbers recalled that Pis Fessler and 1s Newton told_ us the City Council, !wanted to broaden the HPO'°s goals and their volunteer participatjon, but neither mentioned the Council wanted to disband tah,e NP6's.y Members find no reason to disband the existing NP'O'a in order to broad- en con ntrnty ,goals and participation in the City. g1es bers finds , -to the cootrarVi. if the Council disbands the APO s ,p�r.c�ip�ti ®n and weaken . i.t scold .lessen. neighbor- hood and volunteer n neighborhood representation Motion Jim Blanchard; to endorse more goals and such for the existing NPO' s and reject the CIT's concept. Second` Ed Howden; In Favor_ 4; lgairnst 0; Abstain: O. $e will submit a letter on this 9 his motion,, under the Chats- s; sie�a�ature,, to City Council. ALBERT:9:0H GROCERY STORE PROPOSAL John Shonkuiler, on behalf of Albertson, invited .members and guests to cot -inent on a proposal to locate an Albertson grocer-Si store in the uzc- ii'n t.y o? Scholls terry and Murray. Comments on access, screening, buil ding design and such were given. Suggestions to add a gas station, res taurant, laundry. children's day care and such were also given. REUIEU OF UOTICES or DECISIO Notices of decision were read. OTHER BUSINIESS ELECTION or UICE -CHAIRMAN Members nominated and elected Ed Houden as our new ujc - chairnan. UPDATE ON CPR 92 -006 ?: 600WQE STREET .t400$1* t enbers reconsidered the request for appr-oual of the final aaigr;rient another alignment - - .....,tensions ry recite option gnr�ent and dos nat�c�n b and designation for the 6aarde Street extension. Chair &loiale c g R e�e a a by heftber and res dents. The intent of this option is to mitigate: 1) Resident disp1acestestt: 2) Severe . oad cut -and -ffiXi desiOn and anV land -slide hard; S) Ni qh road constructiisn cos aad b► ; - housing► cost Impact; and 1) Nceighborrhood! segmentation..a . and to discourage . . ; and 1) Through traffic between Beaverton and Tuai itan 2) Any arterial r -- designation and 'widening_ final alignment= design and des Motion: �1 �1 ®ole�y, to recommend the nt� ignnation for the Gaarde Street extension • as fo11®14s 1) Alignment:. _ connect to 132nd as shown on Exhibit. as 2) Design: minor collector standards with deviations to comply with the UPRa and 3) Designation: minor collector- Second: Jim Blanchard; In favor: 4; against: 0; Abstain: 0. `1de will submit a letter on this motion, under the Chair's signature, City Engineer Randy LJooley.. REQUEST FOR AN OPINION' FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY Members discussed a proposal to request the City Attorney to advise us on arhether it is possible to make a land use decision with a referendum or initiative petition to the voters. Motion Dill Gross; to request the City Attorney to render his opinion on whether- it is possible to legislate a land use decision with an ini- tiative or referendum petition to the Voters of Tigard. Second: Ed Howden In favor_ 4; Against: 0; Abstain: O. .. .. A ST AT SCROLLS FERRY UPDATE ON STREET-GRADE CHANGE ON i 21 ' The street grade change cede on 121 st during the Scholls Hui reconstruc tion project is too severe for a safe approach to Schois F Chair Uooiery discussed this grade change with City Engineer Uooiey. ticheal'` Malls, City Construction Inspector, is discussing this matter with the State Highway Diuision. MEEETIHG ADJOURNED RT 9=i5 PM Res j.,.., Jct,fullV submitted, tted, Bill Gross, Secretary LEGIBILITY STRIP • • 1..L 9, et I Exhibit a GflRROE STREET EXTENSDW tIPO R7 Option alignment syr iii law A ..1. 4: \ 7, . : :: . -- . I " t -ae.. `°15 '.6 . •x -R .... -'4. ® tt.esi Cal Iloolery' HP0 1$? Chairman 12356 SU 132nd Court Tigard, OR 97223 639 -4297 January 7. 1993 Randy Mooley CITY or TIGRRD 1 31 25 SU Hall Tigard,, DR 9T223 639-41 71 RE: CPR 92 -0007 6HBRDE STREET EXTENSION This letter clarifies spy oral presentation ° of the "HP3 #a Option;" to the Planning Commission last Monday. The "NPO t? Option" proposes the alignment, design and designation for the Gaarde Street Extension as fol owsq 1) Alignment: connect to 132nd as shown or Exhibit A; 2) Design: minor collector standards with deuiations to conply with the UPRA; and 3) Designation: minor collector. The intent of the proposal is two -fold. The first is to mitigate: 1) Resident displacement: 2) Severe road cut- and -fill design and any land -slide hazard; 3) High road construction cost and any housing cost impact; and 4) Neighborhood ghborhood segmentation. And the second a s to discourage: 1) Through traffic between Seauerton and Tualitan; and 2) find► arterial re- designation and widening. Sincerely. S V• e4141471.4 1111 IS SIM isl II' ;mo �. r. " - 1111111111=1 .. A t• � - Qi.,..Le c: i .: ' II ■ ■ • T7 1-.....;_t I-41 .-,--- c. 33 34 Exh bi t i1m18RDE STREET EXTERSIQH! 6HP6 117_11ptipri R1ignncnt` :. .� � ...1L_ 1 :7;1.1:14# T - ' X - _.� ('. tee.:... HINGTC3f� -� 1.�_ • ISLAND f! XftS- JRiiul66RY 6. 1-993 • • `C ' °i`▪ T . «...? '+.4544. a� ' + , nom' • ^ . � q f ir�� A • S, 0wni I � 711.7. � � w i s d rog4 1' s. e ciS r. a�s�r • �T" .� '4•�. _ 4 • reV, -r*� Imo® °•...�. • s Ra V/ i . r+u • a� '-9- -J .. '_•"',YT'- I es O.ri°' a: 1 r 4 3.. • . - �` .tom. .. .- t ®.�. .rte'. �i"„ �. J SO Z r W �kyi CAL WOOI�i OPT' °F ANALYSIS OF �O 7 ��. Attachment #1 is a map of the NPO #7 option drawn in the same • y 'presented to' the Planning format as the options prev�'�ausl Commission. General The alignment proposed by #7 avoids the very sty eep terrain that option would traverse. . As a option d b NPO the NPO #3 ®r� e � result/ this o t�.on would , would r e major cuts and be ea,�ier to dles�. and build and would not require fills. It avoids the need to acquire any of the existing homes on Walnut Street. . _ � " impacts to w It has the same problems as the NPO #3 option regarding i pacts to existing 132nd Avenue. Under the NPO #7 option, all of g 132nd Avenue would become a collector street. t Widening of 132nd Avenue to .collector street standards would present the same problems previous?4 discussed in the NPO #3 option. �.; Traffic No detailed traffic analysis has been done for the NPO #7 option. However, by comparing it to the previous options, we can get an idea of future traffic under this new option. Under the NPO #7 option, the Gaarde extension is a less direct .s t.rAs a than under the Report Option extension could P , connection to Walnut Street , .. � On thr other O .Y: u.Ld be ex ester � have less f'ic result, Gaarde e under the NPO #7 option than under the Report p a direct grades Walnut hand, the NPO #7 option is more of direct connection to than the NPO #3 option. It also eli j the steep grad of the . urinates NPO #3 option. Therefore, the NPO #7 opt be expected to � on .could carry more traffic on the Gaarde extension than the NPO #3 option. Simply put, we could ex p ect the fu ture traffic on the Gaarde Street extension under the NPO #7 option to be somewhere between the 5,000 projected � 10r000 vehicles per day projected ,for the NPO #3 option and the vehicles per day projected for the Report - Option. This would put c range suggested for a major collector the street in the traffs, g option were • , if the NPO #7 op street in the Comprehensive Plan. So adopted, the Gaarde extension should be designated and between collector street. Likewise, :on should be_designated existing 13 wise, the portion of 13 d a tween Walnut and the new Gaarde. extens�. collector street. The portion of existing 132nd south of the new Gaarde . g : street. si rated as a minor collector str aarde cxtensa.on could be d�e tu Similar comparisons could be made on other streets. Under the NPO #7 option, future traffic on the other of streets the 'Re expected to Dort be in a range between the Projections p O p ton and the. APO #3 option. Land. Use Under the NPO #7 option, the impacts to existin g homes a on 132nd • venue would be similar to the i npacts' � under the ':N PO'. 13 option,, Future widening of 132nd would create severe Impacts' . to access' t, existing homes. Because traffic would, be greater under the NPO' #7 option, °, the need for widening would, be grater ,'d 'addbtianal turn lanes might be needed at the major :intersections. The connection between Benchview Terrace (a minor' collet:t ®r street) and the Gaarde extension would be ' less direct under the WO ,17 option than under the other two options As a result/ there would be a potential for future local streets between Benchview' and the Gaarde extension . to carry additional through traffic. Cost The cost of improvements that wet :id require City funding is approximately the same. under the WO, #7 option and the NPO #3 opt ,on . These costs are primarily associated with collector street im provements t o existing 13 2nd. A veru• e. It is estimated the required City funding under the two M®options would be $150,000 to $200,000 greater than under the Report Option. Recommendation While the NPO #7 option reduces the construction problems associated) with the NPO #3 option, staff still recommends; the Report Option. In our view, the. Report Option has the least impacts to existing developed neighborhoods and provides the best system for long -term. traffic needs. rw /note2 #7' MAJOR COLLECTOR AR COLLECTOR I.00AL STREET AX PROXIMATE ALIGNMENT (Exact alignment to be 43 determined . at time of development. TN P`t, ?IC SIGNAL (When Warranted) S'1• . ' . 121st Hountaim Rd_ imteraectiou approximately 7OO' .' met of 126th i'. e. SW. 131st unri e` L.n S v. 150 fill eve. Mane tore torom Dora II ti THE CITY SHALL PLAN FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT STREET AND ROADWAY SYSTEM THAT MEETS CURRENT NEEDS ' AND ANTICIPATED FUTURE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT. 8.1.2. THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR EFFICIENT MA AGEMENT' OF THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS WITHIN THE CI'T`Y AND THE METROPOLITAN AREA THROUGH COOPERATION WITH OTHER FEDERAL, .STATE,' REGIONAL ANO LOCAL JURISDICTIONS .S.1.3 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THAT: DEVELOPMENT ABUT A PUBLICLY DEDICATED 'STREET OR HAVE ADEQUATE ACCESS APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE APPROVAL AUTHORITY; STREET RIGHT—OF—WAY BE DEDICATED WHERE THE STREET IS SUBSTANDARD IN WIDTH: THE DEVELOPER COMMIT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STREETS, CURBS AND SIUEWALCS TO CI TY STANDARDS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT; INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPERS , CURBS AND SIDEWALKS PARTICIPATE IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF EXISTING TO THE EXTENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT'S ; IMPACTS SIQEWAtKS T F. STREET IMPROVEMENTS BE MADE AND STREET SIGNS OR SIGNALS BE, PROVIDED WHEN THE DEVELOPMENT IS FOUND TO CREATE OR INTENSIFY 'A.TRAFFI C HAZARD; TRANSIT STOPS, ,,BUS TURNOUT LANES AND SHELTERS BE PROVIDED' WHEN THE PROPOSED USE OF A TYPE WHICH GENERATES TRANSIT RIDERSHIP PERSONS AND PARKING SPACES BE SET ASIDE AND MARKED FOR CARS OPERATED BY DISABLED THAT THE SPACES BE LOCATED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE RSONS ENTRANCE DESIGNED FOR DISABLED PERSONS; AND LE TO THE LAND BE DEDICATED TO IMPLEMENT THE BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED PLAN. y ON &IDER THE FOLLOWING WHEN PREPARING STREET 1.�1 IMPRO IMPROVEMENT PLANS THAT AFFECT S.W. 121ST AVENUE OR GAARDE STREET. , a. EXISTING RESIDENTIAL 'STRUCTURES AND ` THE IMPACT ON THE THE IM E ALTERNATIVES ,WHICH HAVE THE MINIMUM ADVERSE EFFECT IN TERMS OF: R ' 4r vUCING THE DISTANCE BETWEEN' THE DWELT; ING AND THE STREET; AND 2'• NOISE IMPACTS; EFFECT THE IMPROVEMENT ON THE TRAF �'IC F1,Oh1. AND IMPROVEMENT WILL HAVE POSSIBLE NEGATIVE.EFFECTS ON OTHER STREET REIET INTE RSECTIONaa C. MINIMIZING THE USE OF ,THESE STREETS AS PART OF THE ARTERIAL SYSTEM FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC, 11.3 • Z THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL WORD'' WITH O. . THER ' C0VERNMENTAL BODIES. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARTERIAL ROUTE CONNECTION FROM MURRAY BOULEVARD,' oR SCHOLLs FERRY ROAD TO PACIFIC HIGHWAY, THIS ?ARTERIAL: ROUTE BHOULD SE LOCATED t■wES T OF BULL MOUNTAIN, AND SHOULD NOT _UTILIZE ROADS WHICH PASS THROUGH EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREAS WITHIN TIGARD,. TH Irv,.„ —, -dm q `� *r , -.w «». r.. .,.,r .« .w, rn...,. Sil t 1, r 7/72,,9)(74/2/..v 2.iiio? vrtt .4 n1 ii7oyi OI/d�l � '�' /s 2-� -0 q' 4A61 07 N 711187 1.4 97 /' 2 C4/1147 1?-0•//' ordmr2vral 4, /.5-.„0" tip, 14,9y,x,vpiv ),,t4/ / 4blipai -fife _ILK i / tialip-i50/1(/ 'Z,./ 5,// -TOY 1/4-FPS1192/1(/ , 77492 leVi *92(..Pg' / 51 ''?"11; 5 /AO i prilll/fbp is 41i 7'J11.W 411o;/( :WV 47 ,obi . _ l': ���/4ah. _......_ � l �.�W/ ui .cm .-f, d r I 6 f 1 ; 1 ! ! f n , J Off'' MEI 'ril 7 rI ® a (yt.. !' '.i` e' w ' 1 _�dM(1t ;�',r 1 r i�. `J'�r .. H` 1N �Y� n" t .1` �! / .. F;4tix.� ., "M 9'7..' ^p''"» .A Y.. ^ "i„�`^+1 lt.Y r �', _, '•.�x �. 'rr," + ,' .t,,, w ,l °'it "r, _„r�wl . y+ l.�1 «r- rRri '7 -`:K a'r ,i n 4- .4 �.t• �_ .A� rhrry r z i •.;, . x ^_�^ .st. .� t _'.. .A.... �...L •C .!itw�. t k ,`� �Y 4 1,,1 y�,�C:rY iN!' "rt TL • IT. ,I "t pc-, �t M'7. ^1•'. �.Y Y. .'t-'e r�•lar a b p.M �,•. trrY'M' Y. . „ i ,n 1 e t k aft 4.i=i: = t, •r � ^r r.,. «. na r '0 y. , Ti„'; 1Mr xi' nrtl 'F rw ,nfYi 1, _ • •..,�; ,t fr^ fit. • V in r III `;" " *9 �t 4i/ ,� . w M t �� 1 � " { `r J �'tr � x Y * d � "� r r, s = l ;`r`4`. 40 6'�: r„Y` a ��{.. n �4 77 ...i.Y NiA 1+ "�^ a• r �''t { ,_ . y1' } r.4 7 i 1 "x t t 1 l' 11 , - 4,M i l JJJ¢ I 'ww x r I ,.�" ,{• '' .ci..[ .4 t s h: A. ',YtY9• "E"' -�±.. r ;"'.ly,,,,,4 t _ tii* "R't• l / M.; r,f M+1:' �.-^i , ee' .•p,+1 -..... .1y1 L... r t I, µf , t`' iT ,1 I,° }ter '" 1,,,+ MP n pp /t -, , ....mow ..ter angry 14, 1993 OREGON Larry Bell Lutz Snyder 13815 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Bell: n considered red: for Enclosed are .copies.. of two options that are being co n �. the future roadway system in the area of 135th and Walnut. Once an option is chosen, the roadways will be constructed in accordance p p development occurs. anticipate that the with the adopted lan as devel rs I a City Council will hold a hearing in February regarding selection of the preferred alternative. If you need additional information, please feel free to contact me. 'Highway �,Divisio ai o doing As we discussed, the Oregon State g y n is some long -range planning for our region,, in a process claled the Western Bypass Study (WBS) . The WHS is considering sevier:a options for improving the transportation system in Washington County. One of the options includes., a 'Murray .Boulevard COrra.dor" through the area of 135th and Walnut . If the WBS process leads `to selection of this option, then a more specific' roadway alignanent would need to be defined. If you need more Hinformation about the WBS process, 1 would suggest contacting Debie Garner at 235 -5881 or Bilk. Cie at 653 -3240. Sincerely Randall R. Wooley City Engineer 13125 5 kali Blvd,, T1 gardi' 97225 ,;' O r .. (503) 63?- 4171 TDB (503) 684y2772 h , • /L. u � dq . Ave =MIR ARTERIAL' Ns no an }&MOR COLLECTOR MINOR COLLECTOR LOCAL STREET APPROXIMATE ALIGHT `Exact align :seat to be IS determined at time of [r development. n'RRPPTC SIGNAL (When Warranted) . Sunrise Lrr . S.W. 150th ARTERIAL }U OI3 COLLECTOR =NOR COLLECTOR Loom STREET APPROXIMATE ALIGNMENT (Exact , alignment to be determined at time of development. TI PPIC SIGNAL (When Warranted) E SW. 131st JAN-08-1993 13 :44 r c PR°GRAM MAWAGEMEr.rT TO 95E041297 P.02/03 INPO in /MUTTS January 6, 1993 • Joint Meeting with NPO *7 called to order at 7=00 p -m. - Councilor Judy Feealer and Lis Newton Presented the current information and recommendations regarding the restructurin g of NPO' s and boards and committees into Community Involvement Teams (C to City Council, and two possible e c�a recommendations T'P � � � . A handout O� a S 1e agenda., y po geographical ographical breakdown maps were presented to all members. Discussion and questions took place. Both NPO s will discuss during their own meetings and send feedback via their aninutes . Joint meeting ad j ousted at 7:35 p . m • NPO #3 meeting called to order at 7:35 p.m. . Present: Bishop, Fronde, Garner, Hansen, Helm, Mortensen, Porter • Presentation of plans for . a new subdivision adjacent to Ames Orchard on the north side of Bull Mountain close. to 121 Ave. and Gaarde St. w0.3 given by Bob Ames and Mark Rockwell. Most of the discussion revolved around the desire by the developers not to have access at this time from Gaarde St. A stub to the property to the eaet is planned so that it and when the owner of that property develops a connection can be made to' Gaarde St. at 118 Ave. NPO #3 will discuss again when the applicaton is on the agenda. • ZCA 92 -0007 Mueller. The property owner has built a narrow road for access to three tuts under Washington County . asking for annexation to the City of standards Motion: NPO #3 asks that the cit... and county work Tigard. together for a compatible code within the urban growth boundary.- Passed unanimously. • SDR 92 -0021 Ruble /P.D.G,,Application for Site development of a lot located on Highway 99W between Pietro' s and Hot n e Now for a Paco Bell restaurant. Dave Einoel of PDG and a represent aLive of Taco Bell presea ted tke plans and the questions of accessibility' to the currently °landlocked" lot. Negotiationa are currently underway to share the driveway to Piel.rO' 8 According to Dave Kinrn;el. it accessibility cannot be obtained front either the north or south _ side of the property the d evelopmeiit, not take: place. Lengthy and ersiste nt dagcu9sion 'took p lace re g arding the use of Park St. for the ingress /egress of }kit n' NOi . On January 4, the Piatatiitig C rd NPO #3 ' s appeal of the omms��ion _hen 08 -.19 3 13 :44 PRfl3RAM Mf VPt MEN T aignage for the right turn only. out Of Rot n' Now;' ona have an enforceable right turn only sign posted. are stall ' very concerned about safety on Park St agre l . to Residents motions N O #3 requests that city staff give NPO'e an portunity of request traffie' impact, studies, .etc. and in the, future have the right to 90e all . plane and development studies (as available to the City) before staff approves and permits are given. Passed unanimously. Other Business - Cal Woolery and . Bill Gross of NPO #7 gave information regarding their compromise plan for the Gaarde St extension-. Their aanuazy 4, 1993 minutes will contain, details. PO Notion: NPO #3 requests ' that the City schedule a joint oint meeting for N s #3 & #7 to discuss the Gaarde St. extension if the City Council will be hea ng this issue before our regular meetings on February 3, 1993. We also ask that the city mail notices to all residents. of NPO #3 & #7 regarding �g issue ty alert. them to the date it will lbeon the oun iag etda . s , Other Business - niscu8siQu of the community Involvement Team concept. Motions The current NPO's experiment and expand their format. The I`PO' s should be able to vote for any change, merger, set number of members, and, have power to amalgamate. Residents outside the city, but in the urban growth boundary should be invited and be allowed to vote. Passed unwitintously. 'n ] o ad'urued at 10:20 p.m. e t1 1D. Meeting c full. d t �es�p� submitted, �' gala Garner !di. 7440 92 THU December 2 1992 '1 4 0RF >AC ECEllY DEC 4 1992 CITY OF TIGARD . Liz Newton Tigard Community Developient 13125 SU Hall Tigard. OR 97223 Tel: 639-1171 Fax: 684 -729? Bill Gross 11035 SU 1 255th Tigard,, OR 97223 Ti: 524 -6325 RE:, NP® #&? MEETING; UEDNESDRY, DECEMBER 2, 1992 -7 P!1 MEETING CRLLED TO ORDER AT, 7:10 PM. ROLL CALL Present: Dorsett, Blanchard, Cunningham. Gross, lc6linchy. Excused: hoc► zr9, Houden. flPPR00E0 MINUTES rRot ;NOUET18ER 4 1992 MEETING AS RERD P s 01 UELCOME TO GUESTS Uice -chair Dorsett welcomed Ironwood Loop residents as guests to our meeting. HOP 92 -0104 SAFE ,RHO SOUND MRSSAGE Members considered the notice of decision on HOP 92 -0184. Members con- sidered whether to appeal the apprdual of this home occupation Permit for massage services i. g on Ironwood Loop in the uzcn of Scholls Ferri; and Spr--inguoodgDrive ; �.ty o !� i; Members considered testimony from= L1o�Yd Sell, applicant, including personal resur�ew classes anti class hour c ense as required by s taken f or' a naissage to tini oian 13 c Oregon law;, final ekar� schedule for his license and a prc rise riot use any signage; and I i • Iroa��ood Loop.. residents, 1nc1.Ua�ing conce reet rhs about on - st par^1C- inn = tra�ffi.c,; massage ser'ruices and signag�e %7 P./eel' t 4- r r F_- 92 THU ' * 151 ORPAC Members discussed i n detail: Basis for any permit appeal i now; Basis for any permit revocation later; and Applicant's Promise not to use any signage. P . 0 2 Motion: Larry ` Mcelinchy; to hake no appeal of this hone occupation per -' nit as them; is nii basis for appeal, but recommend, that applicant work with Ironwood !Loop residents to resolve' their concerns. Second: Jim Blanchard; In Favor: S; Against: 0; Abstain: CPA 92- 0007: IILJRRRV RD (SHARDE ST> IEXTEtiSION Our NPO convened with NPO #3 to consider the request for approval of St) 9 g g y extension. Members considered two ro osals for rra. en , desig final alignment, design and desi nation for the Mauli V nt P P g e design and designation referred to as Report Option and HPO 13 Option. Our members considered testimony from: Randy 'Dooley, City Engineer; lHermar! Porter NPO 13 Chair; and Residents in the vicinity of 'Bull Mtn and Gaarde and McDonald streets. Our members voted on five ballots: Ballot 1. Recommend approval of, Report Option. In Favor: 0. Ballot 2. Recommend approval of NPO 13 Option. In favor: 0. Ballot 3. Recoruhend 1) rejection of both options and 2) Request staff to develop another option. In favor_ S. ro l Ballot 4. IF HO OTHER ' OPTION IS POSSIBLE recor'lnend a pprova of Report Option. Yn Favor: O. Ballot S. IF BO OT HER OPTIJi' IS POSSYBLE, r- ecanmend approval ' of tiP0 t3 Option In Favor_ 5 NPfl 7' Mtr"k` = n`rY-k�rnla Elo EDIEU or NOTICES or DECISION atices of decision were read aboue; OTHER BUSINESS RESISHATION or UXCE- CHAIRtIAN Katy Dorsett resigned as vice -chair as she sold her douse and will ,moue to Portland soon. Members win nominate � � . ect a new vice- -chair at our next meeting. te' and �3 MEEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:10 PM. Respectf ul l9 .: ubni tted , , Nfl fir kt Y f r .rri rcr Ara o ic'tb r W NM /3 IteitITES si. • feting called to order 7:05 p.m. Piet. Bishop, Froude, Gamer, Hansen, Bella, &doer, Porter Minutes from November 4, 1992 were approved as written. Old Business A repogt from Chief Ron Coodp� regarding the trAftie count on Gaarde St. was noted as relived and review by all mom. Review of notices received - NPR, 3's 'even for an appeal of the planned cadtm Hot n' Now to be built at the tamer of 14/ Own 99W and Park St. has been accepted, and the appeal fee waived. A hewing before the Planning Commission is tentatively set for January 4, 1993. Other Business NOW was Ynude that the Tigard Triangle developirsnt plan has bec passed. The new Community Commercial zone request hay', been sent to the City Council. NPO #3 adjourned and joined NPO #7 for an issue of mutual interest. Toint Meeting with NPO `#'7 Randy Wools , . y City Engineer, presented inky/nation vicinity two active C ,~ ' ee F regarding th proposals for the extension of Gaarde St. to Walnut in the vicinity of S.W. 132 Ave. The two versions are referred to as Thie Report" " epo ", from the City of Tigard and the "NPO" version created by NPO #3. Overhead slides were shown and discussed detailing the two plans,; with advantages and disadvantages of each. Muck ,� discussion among nretnbers of both NPO's and interested neighbors • were offered to vote on and the breakdown ter�es�d nei hbaES ensued. Four choices is as follotVs NPO Plan The Report Neither Plan If have to choose between plans: NPO Plan The .Deport Abseaton k. A x NPO NPO Pl The n Neither Plan If have to choose betvieen NPO Plan The RePcgt Neighbors NPO Plan The RDort Neither Plan Total If have to choose between plans: MO Plan The Peport NPO Plan The Report Neither Plan If have to choose between plans: NPO Plan The Report Beverly Froude reminded everyone that all the NPO's can do is neighbers must attend hearings of the Planning Commission and Herman Porter noted that he understands that if a citizen wishes be in person at tht..: Planning Commission. If they do not testify Commission they cannot testify before the City Council. Meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lila Gannet 3 3 I 13 11 3 5 1 21 20 advise, Iriterested the City Council. to testify they mast at the Planning ri 0.' andy WWooley (Elaine Moore 639 -4655 Telephone she is ill and cannot make the meeting tonight. the wanted to pass the following information on you. If you understand what I wrote great. call if you need some claification. I f not you can give. her a Entrance on south end is okay But exit on north end goes through two properties where there are two homes. if the south where the Would be � better �..� exits to the �ae�t, just t o t housing is on 132nd. Then crosses over where Burge properties is undeveloped. 'then goes up undeveloped area to Fern Street.' Two 'lots in that area . are now for sale - same property water district had filled. Would take some traffic off Walnut When the Sednick property developes then that is a better entrance to this new road. Has said this before and would say again, at tonights meeting. Wants to make sure here recommendation is brought up. J '4 ;d'O'Os ' / REQUEST FOR 'COMMENTS ..t' ►,- 1 L ? , r DATE:, October 29 1992 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: COMPRBHENSI VF PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 92 -0007 CITF OF TIGARD (NPO :. 43) A request for Compreheisive Plan Amendment approval `''' to the Transportation Plan Map which relates to the future alignment of a, collector street connecting S.W. Walnut Street and S.W. Gaarde Street.. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, and '12; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1a, 1.1.2,E 8.1.1, 8.1,2, 1 11.3.1, and 11.3.2; Community Development Code ` Chapters 18.22 and 11.30.! LOCATION: Northeast side of Bull Mountain (west of SW 121st Avenue and SW Gaarde Street, south of Walnut Street, and east of SW 132nd 'venue. Attached and applicant's statement for your review. From information suppled by Plan nvarious departments and agencies and from other_. information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Nov. 9, 1992. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you ; are unable to rend by tr(e above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and. confirm your comments in writing as soon as po you s regarding this matter, Y qu Y Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. Tigard If ou have any estion g PHONE: 539 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: _Randy Tfooley PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS TEAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no cbJections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclooed letter. Written Comments: munimmoomswissraisisommo Name of Person Commenting: t Phore Number: .0. October 1992 FRequesl,ed Revision to the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map GAARDE STREET EXTENSION Proposal Currently, the Comprehensive Plan transportation Map includes a study area referenced to Note 2. Note 2 indicates that two options are under consideration for a future connection between the Walnut/132nd intersection and the Gaarde /121st intersection. It is proposed to select one of the two options under consideration and to amend the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map to reflect the option chosen. History In 1983, the City of Tigard and Washington County both adopted comprehensive plans that called for a future extension of Murray Boulevard to connect with the intersection of Walnut Street and 135th ■venue. Both plans also called for future connections between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street in the area west of 121st Avenue. No specific alignments Were indicated. In 1986, Washington County entered into urban planning area agreements with the cities of Beaverton and Tigard. The agreements indicated that the extension of Murray Boulevard would be designated as a collector street and provided a drawing showing the alignment between Old Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. In adtction, the agreements stated that an alignment would be developed for a collector street between 9 9 � the 135th Avenue/Walnut Street and the 121st Avenue/Gaarde e Street intersections. The agreements established design standards for the road. City i stain Transportation Study, intended to ty g Northeast In 1989 the Ci began its Northe y Following several public meetings, define the future collector street system for the area. Fell ®vein s including hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, most of the recommendations of the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study Report were April of 1990. the, recommendations regarding the connection p p ' However, recommendations raga adopted in between 135th/Walnut and 121 st/Gaarde intersection were not adopted; at the close of the hearings, two options remained under consideration. In addition, the Council had heard requests that the urban planning area agreements be amended to delete the Murray Boulevard connection between Old Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street due to GAARDB STREET EXTENSION - October 199 Page ' • concerns about through traffic. Selection of the preferred option for the Walnut- Goarde connection was deferred pending a decision on whether the urban planning area agreement would be modified, w In subsequent discussions with other jurisdictions, .4 the • rsdipti ©ns, there was not support for amending planning area agreements. However, there was support for an agreement on urban anrn the timing of the proposed Murray Boulevard extension. As a result, an agreement was drafted that assures that the Murray Boulevard extension between Scholls Ferry Road • and Old Scholls Ferry Road shall not be opened to through traffic prior to the comp' ation of other road improvements on the west side of Bull Mountain as provided in the County's Transportation agreement is intended raps ortat�on lan. The a g todisco urage the development of the Murray Boulevard extension as a route for through traffic. The agreement has been approved by Washington County and the cities of Beaverton and Tigard; the agreement was signed in January 1992. When Tigard's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map was updated in 1991, a study area was added to indicate the two options still being considered for the collector street connection between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street. ` The study area is known as "'Note 21'. A copy of the map is included as Attachment #1. proposed process be completed by adopting one of the options for a It is now ro used that the p p y p ' 9 p ' collector street connection between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street. 112 0on The 1990 recommendation of the City staff was contained in Figure 12 -1 of the-Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study Report. (See Attachment #2.) Under this plan, Gaarde Street would be extended as a major collector street west and north from 121st Avenue to connect to Walnut Street at a location 300 feet to 400 feet east of existing 132nd Avenue. In addition, the Report recommended that side street access to the major . .icted that direct driveway access be prohibited, and that reduced design widths be be restricted, . _ . considered between access points. This option will be referred to as the Report Option. NPO Option The `g he Nes hbor hood Planning Organization (NPO #3) recommended that Gaarde Street be � extended west from 121st as a minor collector, connecting to 132nd Avenue. The NPO recommended designed nimended that the street be des ned fit a speed of 25 mph. Under this option, existing 132nd Avenue would provide the candor street connection between Gaard e and Walnut Streets. In 1991 a preliminary plat was submitted for a subdivision along the 132nd Avenue extension west of the Gaarde /121st intersection. During the hearings on the proposed GAARDF' STREET EXTENSION - October 1992 Page 2 r . subdivision, there was substantial discussion of whether the subdivision should provide for the westward extension of Gaarde as proposed by the NPO. After reviewing alternatives submitted by the applicant, the Planning .Commission voted to approve a preliminary subdivision layout that did not directly provide for the Gaarde extension to 132nd. . i persuaded suitable for . were rsueded that the. site wa 1 - members - ...Evidence was provided 32nd Commission me construction of an east we steep des p east-west collector street due to stee grades. that a collector connection to 1 32nd Avenue could better be provided north p � of the site where grades are less steep. On appeal, the Planning Commissions decision was upheld by the City Council it Resolution 91 -75. Consequently, the NPO Option represented in � y, p n Attachment #3 shows ws Gaarde extended intersect (north west and north from 121st to intersect 132nd at a near Benchview Terrace of the approved subdivision site). Traffic Coo arisons • Mountain Transportation Study, future traffic In conjunction with the Northeast Bull �Iounta�n Tra �,,, full volumes on the collector street system were forecast. The forecasts assumed development of the area, based on maximum practical development under existing zoning and recognizing the development restrictions of steep slopes, drainageways and existing subdivisions. Based on these forecasts, Appendix E in the Northeast Bull Mountain Study Report pp s contains material on future street capacities. Appendix E indicate that the collector acceptable levels street system designed to typical City of Tigard standards will provide accep l i a few intersection's. Additional of service uncle. projected future traffic volumes, except These intersections are lanes may be needed in the future at some intersections. along the Walnut/Murray connector from 135th to Scholls Ferry Road; along Gaarde Street near Highway 99W; and possibly at the intersection of 121st and Walnut. The information in Appendix E assumed that the Report Option would be adopted. Selection of the NPO Option would not change the general conclusions stated above. l projections some streets, ` done in 1 990 in conjunction with the However, selection of the NPO Option w on work do J_ would change ra �c below. All discussion is based o as discussed b s Northeast Bulb Mountain Transportation Study. Copies of the 1990 Study Report are available for review in the City Engineering Department. The NPO Option would reduce the future traffic on GatArde Street. West of 121st Avenue, the build-out traffic underthe NPO Option would be approximately 5,000 vehicles per day, compared to 10,000 vehicles per day the Report Option Under either L P y Cn er da under Option. and fall option, the projected volumes exceed the guidelines for a minor collector t an lane typical major collector. A two-lane street with acenter within the volumes � �cel adeauate under either option. at intersections would b o GA eRDE STREET EXTENSION' - October 1992 Page 3 On Gaarde Street near Highway 99W, the NPO Option reduces projected traffic volumes by approximately 20 %. The need for future additional tum lanes would be delayed but the long- term facility requirements would be generally the same as for the Report Option, On Walnut Streot near 135th, the NPO Option reduces projected build -out traffic volumes from approximately 16,000 vehicles per day under the Report Option to approximately 10,000 vehicles per day under the NPO Option. Any need for additional future lanes at the 135th intersections would probably be eliminated under the NPO Option. Traffic removed from Gaarde Street under the NPO Option would divert to other routes. Impacts would be most noticeable south of Walnut Street on 132nd Avenue and 121st p Option, between Walnut Avenue. Under the Report O oon, 132nd would remain a local street betwee and Benchview. Under the NPO Option, 132nd would become a collector street with a P y projected � 21st between Walnut. and j traffic, volume of 4,000 vehicles per day. On 1 Gaarde, the projected traffic under the NF'O Option is roughly twice the projected traffic under the Report Option. When compared to the ` Report Option, the NPO Option is projected to increase future traffic volumes on 121st north of Walnut by approximately 17% and on Bull Mountain %. . Smaller increases could be Road west of the 135th extension by approximately 29%. Son acre ' expected on other collector streets including the 135th extension south of Walnut North Dakota Street, Bull Mountain Road east of the 135th extension, and the future Sunrise Lane connection. These traffic comparisons are summarized in Attachment No. 4. Land -Use acts In general, both options are located through currently undeveloped property. The y subdivisions s developed in the area. Roadway . are .: design of roadways would be constructed as new ed with the eve o tithe new subdw�sions alignments and grades would be coordinated 9 An exception in the Report Option is the area immediately south of Wainut Street. To complete the connection to Walnut, it is likely that the City would eventually need to acquire and remove two existing homes. gr cn An exception in th _ 132nd Avenue south of Walnut 1- the NPO Option the area along existing 13 ›- Street. i. g of the existing existing has no sidewalks. Several standards The exi • in street is narrow and h o sodewa homes have very steep driveways. anon ln' some cases it p Widening this portion of 132nd to co ``' ry n ruction of dnv�ewa s sidewalks would require major reco st ` , y . " m or adding mid q j g necessary vehicle accesses to existing garages. Major retaining 0 111 might be ne essa to abandon v m� walls would be necessary in some locations: GAAR®E STREET EXTENSION - October 1;992 Page F. • C- - Coordination with Plans State regulations require that comprehensive plans be coordinated with those of adjoining jurisdictions. The existing Regional Transportation Plan, the Washington County Transportation Plan, and the urban planning area agreements with the County and the City of Beaverton all call for a collector street connection between 135th/Walnut and 121 st/Gaarde intersection. To satisfy State regulations, Tigard must either ado pt a plan consistent with h these other existing plans or persuade the other jurisdictions to amend their plans. When the other connection en her plans were aiopted, it was envisioned that the connection between Walnut and Gaarde would be a direct extension of Murray Boulevard. It could be argued that neither of the options currently under consideration precisely complies with this concept. However, the Report Option is more closely in compliance than the NPO Option. Operationally, the Report Option shows little difference from the previously planned concept. Its route is only slightly different from those considered when the comprehensive plans were adopted. During the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study, this route was selected and the direct- connection routes were rejected in order to minimize impacts on existing development. From previous discussions with County staff, it appears that this option is sufficiently in conformance with existing plans to be considered in compliance. It appears that adoption of the Report Option would not require amendment of the other existing plans. The NPO Option deviates further from the direct- connection nonce pt. As proposed by the NPO, this option would not comply with the design standards adopted the planning area agreements. If this option is selected, it appears that Ti and would need to request corresponding ame ndments in the other plans and agreements prior to adopting the plan. Timing and Funding whichever option is chosen, it is anticipated that the improvements Will be made as development of the area occurs. Each subdivision would construct its piece of the y part improvements. The countywide TIF (Traffic Impact of the subdivision rm r roadway as art ' Fee) ordinance provides for TIF developers portions of this P rs . who construct Option route; it is IF credits to dev' #o a of .:. the Report p roadway connection. apply route would qualify forthe TIF credits. y The TIF credits would not clear which portions, if any, of the NPO Option ro q fy The are a immediately adjacent adj s.. cent to W alnu t Street is already developed and is unlikely ` k e l y t o experience substantial redevelo m e n within the next 20 years. In this area the co lleCior street imp rovements w ould likely need t o be completed by the City, Under the Report p complete streets it is not clear Option, TIF funds be used be used ta�com lets he collector ar G Ai�DE TI EET FXTEC SIGN October 1992. Page if TIF funds could be used to upgrade existing 132nd Avenue to collector standards under the NPO Option. Preliminary cost estimates indicate that the NPO Option would be more expensive than the Report Option to construct. Because the NPO Option would traverse more steep terrain, it would require more earthwork than the Report Option. Widening of existing 132nd Avenue to collector standards would require extensive earthrTork, construction of retaining walls, right of way acquisition, and reconstruction of existing driveways. It is estimated that the improvements requiring City funding would cost approximately $150,000 to $200,000 more under the NPO Option. Since construction is tied to private development of subdivisions, the schedule of actual construction is not known. If necessary, the City could eventually complete any missing sections of the roadway and recover the costs from developers as the remaining land is developed. Exact Alignments The Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map describes street alignments in general terms. Precise roadway alignrnents are usually determined at the time of actual development. The precise alignment is typically based on more detailed engineering and the needs of the specific developments that are proposed. Therefore, the proposed options describe only the approximate alignment of the future streets. When sPecific development proposals are considered, there is additional opportunity for public review and comment on the specific alignments. Under either option, the projected future traffic volumes are within the range associated with major collector streets in Tigard (1,500 to 10,000 vehicles per day) In either option, it is recommended that major collector standards should apply. The Report Option can more easily meet the collector standards as it follows a route with more gentle grades. The NPO Option would traverse a steep rugged area east of 132nd and would require steeper grades. Existin g grades on 132nd Avenue exceed collector street standards. Discussion First review may suggest that the NPO Option is more desirable as it has lower projected future traffic volumes on the Gaarde extensior. However, under the NPO . ' further review. shows that Option " traffic will 1 be ' ver te to other exi s fin g collector streets eets such . as 21'st 1 32nd, a nd Bull Mountain Road. These existing streets are already substantially develo p ed as law density residential areas and are not well planned for high traffic volumes. We conclude that it is preferable to carry more of the future traffic increase on the new roadway where new subdivisions can be appropriately designed to accommodate the greater traffic volume: This way, the increased traffic resulting from g � � y � new development GAARDE STREET EXTENSION - October 992 rage f J will,'to a greater extent,.be routed to the new streets'creat new deveiopnient, rather • than to the existing streets- Therefore;' we find that the Report Option is'the preferable options for the routing of trattic Ve also find that the Report Option' Is a better route In that 0t wilt °have more gentle rades, has fewer impacts to existing residential, 'properties, acrd avoids the need to nstruut existing 132nd Avenue south of Walnut: Finally, we find that the Report Option is in compliance with .existing 'regional and local plan. We are not optimistic that the amendments to existing plans could be obtained t� bring the NPO Option into compliance. Recommendations It is recommended that the Note 2 study area on the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map be replaced by the Report Option alignment as depicted in Attachment #2. In addition, it is recommended that Note 2 be revisad to read as follows: "Gaarde Street to be extended west and from 121st Avenue to connect with Vyalnut Street at a 1point 300 feet to 400 feet east of SW 132nd Avenue. Direct driveway access shall be prohibited along the Gaarde Street extension and roadway connections shall be kept to a minimum. The width of J ' may be reduced below the standards for major , f the street ma . ,, cxsllector streets where turn lanes are not required. rw /note2 GAA DE' STPE T XTENSIO :0400t 1993 Page [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] ARTERIAL an NM MEI MdAJOR. COLLECTOR -•R •— MINOR COLLECTOR LOCAL STREET '✓ f � ; .APPROXIMATE ALIGNMENT (Exact alignment to be v determined at time: of pc development. TRAPPIC SIGNAL (When. Warranted) S.W. Ave. cn r . 12Ist REPORT OPTION ALIGNMENT Corridor location 300• - 400' east of 132nd Avenue at W*1 ,ut St. dull Mountain Rd. Intersection approximately 700 • west of 126th Ave. ✓ SW. 137rd Aire. oil case -mils alio 5 55 Sunrise LL S 1f . 150th ► v rr.N.p"" ems eat MMIIIMni ARTERIAL 1421.70R COLLECTOR COLLECTOR LOCAL STREET APPROXIMATE ALIGNMENT (Exact alignment to be c determined at time of develop®ent . TR PFIC S IGNNE. (When Warranted) 8411 Mouatain Rd. JatGe n:ac. ion approximately 700 °.' west of 126th Ave. SW. 131st ' >yw.ti • 0 "216% Projected traffic under NPO Option compared to Report Option. cumbers below 100% indicate flat NPO Option would hti e less traffic than Report Option. 108% . .N,.14- J .Yr 7,16, f 7 .� a771-47". Z w._ ...: .... of 77?7)f yr SFr.. /PY 1 4 SW- [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] .r October 1992 Requested Revision to the Comprehensive Plan Trans ortation Map p GAARDE STREET EXTENSION Proposal Currentiy, the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map includes a study area referenced to Note 2. Note 2 indicates that two options are under consideration for a future connection between the Walnut/132nd intersection and the Gaarde1121 st intersection. It is proposed to select one of the two options under consideration and to amend the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map to reflect the option chosen. Histcry In 1983, the City of Tigard and Washington County both adopted comprehensive plans that called for a future extension of Murray Boulevard to connect with the intersection of Walnut Street and 135th Avenue. Both plans also called for future connections between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street in the area west of 121st Avenue. No specific alignments were indicated. In 1986, Washington County entered into urban planning area agreements with the cities Beaverton and Tigard. o . The agreements indicated that the extension of Murray.. Boulevard would be designated as a collector street and provided a drawing showing the alignment between Old Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. In addition, the agreements stated that an alignment a developed between the 135th Avenue/Walnut Street would be develo ed for a collector street betWee t and the 121st Avenue /Gaarde Street intersections. The agreements established design standards for the road. 1989, the City began its Northeast enT ' .� . In 19 Transportation Study, define the future ile r street st Bull Mountain rinse anon stud intended to including hearings before y .a. Following several public meetings, o s stern for the are 9 9 the Planning Commission and the City Council, most of the recommendations of the N 9 _ . . Study Report were Transportation adopted in April of 1990. However, the nrecom �n recommendations regarding the connection p. 121 sUGaarde _# the hearings, 135thsMlalnl�t and , intersection +Were,... . not adopted; at the close o heard eests that remained � r consideration. n, the Council hod the urban planning on In addition, �.,o options remai uncle 4 p g agreements Murray Boulevard connection between Old Sch�lis��er�e Road amended to delete the Ferry and Walnut Street due to Pagel . .,T EXTENSION d October 1992 9 GAARDE STREET Of concerns about through traffic. Selection of the preferred option for the Wainut- Gaarde connection was deferred pending a decision on whether the urban planning area agreement would be modified. In subsequent discussions with other jurisdictions, there was not support for amending the urban planning area agreements. However, there was support for an agreement on the timing of the proposed Murray Boulevard extension. As a result, an agreement was drafted that assures that the Murray Boulevard extension between Scholls Ferry Road and Old Scholls Ferry Road shall not be opened to through trafW prior to the completion of other road improvements on the west side of Bull Mountain as provided in the County's Transportation Plan. The agreement is intended to discourage the development of the Murray Boulevard extension as a route for through traffic. The agreement has been, approved by Washington County and the cities of Beaverton and Tigard; the agreement was signed in January 1992. When Tigard's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map was updated in 1991, a study still area was added to indicate the two options still being considered for collector street connection between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street The study area is known as "Note. 2 ". A copy of the map L included as Attachment #1. It is now proposed that the process be completed by adopting one of the options for a collector street connection between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street. Report Option The 1990 recommendation of the City staff was contained in Figure 12 -1 of the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study Report. (See Attachment #2) Under this plan, Gaarde Street would be extended as a major collector street west and north from 121st Avenue to connect to Walnut Street at a location 300 feet to 400 feet east of existing 132nd Avenue. In addition, the Report recommended that side street access to the major collector be restricted, that direct driveway access be prohibited, and that reduced design widths be considered between access points. This option will be referred to as the Report Option NPO Option The Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO #3) recommended that Gaarde Street be extended west from 121 st as a collector, connecting to 132nd Avenue. The,. NPO recommended `g speed mph. Under this option, that the. street be designed for a s ee .. dof2 existing 132nd Avenue would provide the collector street connection between Gaarde and -Jr Walnut Streets. preliminary p In 1991 a plat was submitted for a subdivision alon g the 182nd Avenue extension west of the Gaarde/121st intersection. During the hearings on the proposed GAARDB STRTKTBISION - October 1.992 ha 4 subdivision, there was substantial discussion of whether the subdivision should provide for the westward extension of Gaarde as proposed by the NPO. After reviewing alternatives submitted by the applicant, the Planning Commission voted to approve a preliminary subdivision layout that did not directly provide for the Gaarde extension to 1 32nd. Commission members were persuaded that the site was not suitable for construction of an east -west collector street due to steep grades. Evidence was provided that a collector could better be provided north of the site It or connection to 132nd Avenue the Planning `Commission's decision, was where grades are less steep..... On appeal, 9 upheld by the City Council in Resolution 91-75. Consequently, the NPO Option represented in Attachment #3 shows Gaarde extended west and north from 121st to intersect 132nd at a location near Benchview Terrace (north of the approved subdivision site). Traffic Comparisons ._ ... In conjunction with the Northeast Bull Mountain Trans P ortation Study, future traffic is m system .-_. volues on the collector street s were fore cast. The forecasts assumed full development of the area, based on maximum practical development under existing zoning and recognizing the development restrictions of steep slopes, drainageways and existing subdivisions. Based on these forecasts, Appendix E in the Northeast Bull Mountain. Study Report contains material on future street capacities. Appendix E indicates that the collector street system designed to typical City of Tigard standards will provide acceptable levels of service under projected traffic volumes, except at a few intersections. Additional _. e unc+er ro acted future traff coons. These intersections are • may future at some intersections. traffic lanes ma be needed in the fu Ferry along Gaarde along the Walnut/Murray connector from 135th to Scholls Fer Road; alo Street near Highway 99*; and possibly at the intersection of 121st and VValnut. The information in Appendix E assumed that the Report Option would be adopted. Selection of the NPO Option would not change the general conclusions stated above. However, selection of the NPO Option would change traffic projections on some streets, i,,, III discussion ' as discussed below. is work done in 1990 in conjunction with the s b nsStudy. y Copies of the 1990 Study Report Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation P available for review in' the City Eng'lineering Department. Street. West of 121st The NPO Option would ,reduce the future traffic on Gaarde . 5„000 vehicles Avenue, the build-out traffic under the NPO Option would be approximately .. i per day Report Under either e. day, compared to 10,000 per d Y . P; � : .. and fall vehicles er da under the a Re rt option, the projected volumes exceed the guidelines minor collector street r collector; A two-lane street with a center turn lane hen the volumes typical for a major intersections would be adequate under either option. GARDE STREET E TENSIC N - October 1992 Pege 3 0 On Gaarde Street near Highway 99W, the NPO Option reduces projected traffic volumes y 20%. l turn lanes would be delayed but by ap�roximatel 2O.�o. The need for future additions the long -term facility requirements wouk! be generally the same as for the Report Option. On Walnut Street near 135th, the NPO Option reduces projected build -out traffic volumes from approximately 16,000 vehicles per day under the Report Option to approximately 10,000 vehicles per day under the NPO Option. Any need for additior N future lanes at the 135th intersections would probably be eliminated under the NPO Option. Traffic removed frorti Gaarde Street under the NPO Option would divert to other routes. t 2nd Avenue and 121st Impacts would be most noticeable south of lNalnut Street ..Walnut p tree# on 13 Avenue. Under the Report Option, 132nd would remain a local street between and Benchview. Under the NPO Option, 132nd would become a collector street with a projected volume of vehicles per day. On 121st between walnut and Gaarde, the jroected traffic under the NPO Option is roughly twice the projected traffic p under the Report Option. When compared to the Report Option, the NPO Option is projected to increase future traffic volumes on 121st north of Walnut by approximately 17% and on Bull Mountain Road west of the 135th extension by approximately 29 %. Smaller increases could be expected on other collector streets including the 135th extension south of Walnut, North Dakota Street, Bull Mountain Road east of the 135th extension, and the future Sunrise Lane connection. These traffic comparisons are summarized in Attachment No. 4. Land-Us general, p through currently undeveloped property. The In eneral, both options are located throw ^h, current) ur ►...Avel,n the area. Roadway _ .. of the Y roadways would be constructed as new subdiv,�ions are developed alignments and grades would be coordinated with the design o e new subdivisions. An exception ' p ' n in the Report Option. is the area immediately south of Walnut Street. Io complete the connection to Walnut, it is likely that the City would eventussYy need to acquire and remove two existing homes. An exception in the NPO Option is the area along oxisting 132nd Avenue south of Wainut Street. The existing street is narrow and has pro sidewalks. Several of the existing homes have very steep driveways. widening IS portion of 132nd to collector standards t ®r� or adding sidewalks would require major reconstruction of driveways. In.some cases, it might be necessary to abandon vehicle accesses to existing garages. Major retaining walls would be ne°essary in some Iooations. GAARDE STREET EXTENSION - October 1992 Page 4 1 .• t n • Coordination with Other Plans State regulations require that comprehensive plans be coordinated with those of adjoining jurisdictions. The existing Regional Transportation Plan, the Washington County Transportation Plan, and the urban planning area agreements with the County and the City of Beaverton all call for a co llect or street laectson between 135th/Walnut and 121st/Gaarde intersection. To satis fy State regulations, Tigard must either adopt a plan consistent with these other existing p lans or persuade the other jurisdictions to amend their pans. When the other plans were adopted, it was envisioned that the connection between Walnut and Gaarde would be a direct extension of Murray Boulevard. It could be argued that neither of the options currently under consideration precisely complies with this concept. However, the Report Option is more closely in compliance than the NPO Option. Op erationall y, the Re p ort Option shows !Vale difference from the p rev iously planned concep' Its route is only slightly different from those considered when the comprehensive lans were adopted. During the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study, P r~ y, this route was selected � � in order to . and the direct-connection routes were rejected minimize impacts on existing development. From previous discussions with County staff, • g p it appears that this opti on is suff�.c. in �ently conformance with existing plans to be considered in compliance. It appears that adoption of the Report Option would not require amendment of the other existing plans. The NPO Option deviates further from the direct - connection concept. As proposed by the NPO, this option would not comply with the design standards adopted in the urban planning area agreements. If this option is selected, it appears that Tigard would need to request corresponding amendments in the other plans and agreements prior to adopting the plan. Ting and Funding. Whichever option is chosen, it is anticipated that the improvements will be made as development of the area occurs. Each subdivision would construct its piece of the roadway as past of the subdivision improvements. The countywide TIF (Traffic Impact Fee) ordinance provides for TIF credits to developers who construct portions of this y of the Report Option route; it is wa would road �' apply �� route qualify for the TIF credits. connection. The TIF credits �' n ro not clear which, portions, if any, of the NPO Option ut q fy The area immediately adjacent Street'i and is unlikely to this atel to is already developed a, experience substantial redevelopment within the next 20 years In t area the collector improvements ely need to be completed by the City. Under the Report would likely Orto TIE funds could be used be used to complete the collector street. It is not clear Option, P GA1RDE STREET EXTENSION - October 992 Rage r ti if TIE funds could be used to upgrade existing 132nd Avenue to collector standards under the NPO Option. Preliminary cost estimates i 1lu ate that the NPO Option would be more expensive than the Report Option to construct. Because the. NPO Option would traverse more steep terrain, it would require more earthwork than the Report Option. Widening of existing 132nd Avenue to collector standards would require extensive earthwork, construction of retaining walls, right of way acquisition, and reconstruction of existing driveways. It is estimated that the improvements requiring City funding would cost approximately $150,000 to $200,000 more under NPO Option. Since construction is tied to private development of subdivisions, the schedule of actual i construction is not. known. If necessary, the City could eventually complete any missing is sections of the roadway and recover the costs from develoPers as the remaining developed. Exact Alignments The Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map describes street alignments in general terms. Precise roadway alignments are usually determined at the time of actual development. The precise alignment is typically based on more detailed engineering and the needs of the specific developments that are proposed. Therefore, the proposed option s describe onl y the approximate alignment of the future streets. When specific development proposais are co nsidered, there is additional opportunity for public review and comment on the specific alignments. Under either option, the projected future traffic volumes are within the range associated with major collector streets in Tigard (1,500 to 10,000 vehicles per day). In either option, The R it is recommended that major collector standards should apply. Report Option can more easily meet the collector standards as it follows a route with more gentle grades. NPO Option steep rugged and would require The R1P0 O tics would traverse a 5tee m ed area east of 132nd steeper grades. Existing grades on 1 32nd Avenue exceed collector street standards. Discussion First review may suggest that the NPO Option is more desirable as it has lower projected future traffic volumes on the Gaarde extension. However, further review shows that to other • i sUch p w existing already substantially as under the NPO Option traffic will be diverted r existsn collector streets s � existing lly , and � streets ll a lenses! for high traffic 121st, 132nd, and Bull Mountain road These existin p density residential areas and ar not e planned g as salt r are developed afi low de volumes. We conclude that it is preferable to carry more of the future traffic increase on the new roadway where new subdivisions can be appropriately designed to accommodate the greater traffic volume. This way, the increased traffic resulting from new development GAARDE STREET EXTENSION `ctober 992 1 A ee • tr .. 4 'w ill',tto a greater extent,•be routed to the new streets created,t r new development; "lather than, to the existing streets:: Therefore ►e find that the, Report Option ie the preferable option for the .routing of traffic. We ' also',,find that the Report Option is a better route in t►1at I wilt have more gentle r.:, o.,al ei31C ' #1�� nrati Vin: grades, .lay fewer impacts to existing residential pre reconstruct existing 132nd Avenue south of lai'nut. inaily, we find that the Report Option Is in compliance with existing regional and local plans. We are not optimistic that the, amendments to existing plans could be obtained to bring the NPO Option into ,compliance. Recommendations It is recommendedthat the Note 2 study area on the Cornprehensive Plan Transportation Map be replaoed depicted in Attachment #2. In .....,;141 by the Report Option alignment as de ict ollows: addition,; it is recommended that Note 2 be revised to read as f. n and north from 121st Avenue to "Gaarde Street to be extended® point 300 feet to 400 feet east of SW 132nd connect with Walnut Street at a p i y p . i. , the Gaarde Avenue. ; Direct dnvewa .access shall be prohibited' a�dng Street extension and roadway connections shall' be kept to a minimum. The width of the street may be. reduced below the standards for major collector streets where turn lanes are not required. "', rwrrnc,te2 GAARI E STREtT EI - ENS1ON October,' 199 aae [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] ARTERIAL • MAJOR COLLECTOR MINOR COLLECTOR • LOCAL STREET APPROXIMATE ALIGNMENT' (Exact alignment to be v determined at time of development. TRAFFIC SIGNAL (When Warranted) Corridor location 300• 400' east of 132nd Avenue at Walnut St. a. Bull Mountain Rd. intersection approximately :700' . west of 126th Ave., SW. 131st 1U TERThL MAJOR COLLECTOR MINOR COLLECTOR LOCAL STREET APPRiOxx21ATE ALIGNMENT (Exact alignment ' to be - determined at time of development. TUFFSC SXGN11T ( When Warranted) W !:• 121st suit stain Rd. intersection approximately. 7C3 • . • asst of 126th Ave. I S.W. ?50% 1 SW. 141st Ave." Projected traffic under N13O Option compared. to Report Optic. Numbers below 100% indicate that NPO Option would have less traffic than Report Option. Numbers over a00% ;indicate that NPO Optl,on would have more traffic tran. Report Option. -J w, �.. ORDINANCE NO. 9 3-06 4 . AN ORDINAN a TO AMEND PROVISIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 18.96.060 A. REGARDING THE FONT 1 YARD STORAGE OF RECREATION VEHICLES,, CAMPERS, ' TRAILERS AND BOATS TO PROVIDE FOR THE ' FRONT YARD. STORAGE OF eV SUCH I UNITS WHILE RESTRICTING STORAGE IN VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS, USE FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES AND REQUIRING SUCH ''UNITS TO BE LICENSED AND IN MOBILE CONDITION. Roll call vote on the Ordinance was as follows Councilor Fessler Aye Councilor Hawley Aye Councilor Hunt - No Councilor Schwartz - Aye Mayor Edwards Aye k. Mayor Edwards declared ticiat Ordinance No. 93-' +6 passed. by a majority vote cf Council; 4-1. Council Meeting recessed: 8 :36 p.m. Council meeting reconvened: 8:49 p•m1. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - ,COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 92+ -0007 CITY OF TIGARD " (NPO #3): A request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval to the Transportation Plan Map which rela tes to t he future ali grme nt of a co llector street connecting SW walnut Street and, SW Gaarde`Street. LOCATION: Northeast aide, of Bull Mountain (west ( ,of Sid 121st Avenue and SW Gaarde Street, south of SW Walnut Street and east of SW 132nd. Avenue. r • Public hearing was. opened. • Declarat.ons or challenges: Mayor asked ked if any members of Council wished tce report any ex parte contact or information gained outside the hearing, including any site visits. councilor ilor Hunt advised that he visited the svbj ect area with the City. Engineer„ * See note below. • City Engineer Waoiey reviewed the staff report and referred to maps de' p icting te options known as the Rep err Option ( developed and recomluended by staff) and two separate options from NPO Nos. 3 and 7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 1993 - PAGE 14 x *Correction noted at 3/16/93 Council meeting: Councilor Fessler advised she h unci` adl' 'visited L 1 �. the site. cfb OIL 1 City Engineer Wooley reviewed the different traffic counts and impacts projected in other areas tto displacement in each of ugh f the status of the :'stre�ethe options. He also identified (i.e, � lsb collector, major etc .) and how ere' udivisions would be affected. Mr . Wooley reviewed y eviewed t route of the extensionew�. process � occurred select ®n of the several years. _ urredcover the last y The proposal before Council is not a construction plan; but the road would be built as development occurs. p He also outlined the funding sources which would come from a conbinat jon of requirements from developers they build subdivision and from Transportation Tmproveaient Funds (TS ), and allocatiom of funds. City Engineer 'reviewed the staff ' s recommendati outlined the on and ouute, justification for the selection of this City Engineer advised that if the Council selected one of Cit Ex� inset it se the three options at the conclusion of the hearing, then they should direct staff to prepare, the necessary findings and ordinance for adoption. In response to an inquiry from Councilor Fessler, City Engineer clarified that the Planning Commission by .:..: majority vote, supported the NPO 7 recommendation. In response to a question from Councilor Hawley, City ty Engineer responded that two � e would. be affected by Report Option. The NPO 7 option would mean that driveways would have to be rebuilt or garages wo, uld have to be removed from existing homes • No design n, homes on S.W. 13 2nt °i Avenue would be affe, do cted• work has been done to determine ' , homes would be impacted enough so that they would need o be if any of det There was some discussion on o ppurci�ased. Ther on possible impacts to homes with the implementation of the proposed options three d. Public testimony Mr. Cal ;foolery' 12356 S.W. Oregon, explained the option s32nd Court, Tigard, He said he was not P 'uggested by NPO meeting; but noted . � present at the joint NPO 3 and 7 studied he received materials and has d this item. (See Exh ibit 8 of the 'Council packet material for this agenda item), He also the lowest ors NPO selected was ' across that the ible a the P too , proposed development site and W P �� cold c d ac has route toss. a ro create CITY COUNCIL NEETXNG MINUTES 'EBNU x 9' 1993 = PAGE 15 ,y; 1^ a ' four -way !'intersection.,, 1lr. Woolery advised he presented the Npo 7 position to the Planning Commission which is further clarified. in "exhibit m!' contained. the Co =oil packet material for thiEi agenda .item. There was, a 140% 'concurrence of the .NPO that this was the best option. He advised that,' this option was estimated to ;be less expensive than the Report Option which wou].d require purchase of established homes. Councilor Hawley discussed' with Mr. Woolery his January 7 letter -,Which, is on file with, ';the Council packet material. Specifically discussed was the NPO assertion-,'' that their option would mitigate neighborhood segmentation. Mr. Woolery, ecplained this was in regard to the Walnut area. It was clarified during discussion that the Report Option would' affect two properties . Councilor Schwartz noted the impact to property owners along S.W. 13 2nd Avenue with the NPO option. Mr. Woolery responded there was not participation by property owners along 13 2nd Avenue during this most recent round of discussion Councilor Schwartz asked the City Engineer, that if the Gaarde Extension came out on W'ailnit, then S.W. 132nd could be developed to a local standard. City Engineer a g ' advised tY!.at, yes, this was the staff's proposal. In response to a question from Councilor Hunt, Mr. Woolery responded that the NPO option offered better sight - stance at the intersection than the other proposals. I4ayor Edwards asked if anyone at the NPO meeting discussed the consistency rersus1 t Report p ion regard' ard the Washington county 'Transportation' Plan. t hey about d the UPAA has been, , 'no discussion 'On thin. If then or ginale N�urrae Road Extension was to be an indir y y �' ' � act` s stew of streets to ,connect, the WPO "� Option consderad t q item e nts of cal lector streets in f shi on: Report option from Wainut at approximately S.W. 13.0t'.h, roes .;; b+a a more dizect connection frem Want to P4011 .10 Highway. Y 1 3 PAGE 16 P� �'EBRU .. '- CITY COUN CIL METING i�IIN[I`T � -, .�R ;, l In response to Mayor Edwards, Mr. Woo lery advised he read, after the NPO meeting, the November 10, 1992 letter from Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation favoring the staff recommendation to support the Report option. One letter was received by Council as written testimony. Said letter is dated February 6, 1993, from Pat Brownell, 10950 S.W. 115th Street, Tigard, Oregon 97223. (Letter is on file with the Council packet material.) Opponents Rosemary Shrauger, 13030 S.W. Walnut, Tigard, Oregon advised that, if the Report Option were approved by Council/ she would lose her home (where she has resided for the last 31 years) and dog kennel. She said she felt it was morally wrong to take out established homes because of the impact caused by new homes Mrs. Shrauger noted that vacant land near her home had been available up until about a year ago which she felt could have been purchased fo:e this road exterzion. This land has since been sold and construction is now occurring. She said she, as a long -timk taxpayer in the area, should be protected. Money cannot replace the .memories or ideal location, friends and neighbors she will lose in this process. Mrs. Shrauger also noted the concerns she has with waiting' for an unspecified amount of years to go forward with the r; cquisiti.on of ` her land in order to proceed with the actual construction Of the road project. g that, effort to face Mrs. t Shrauger advised that in an . what may be inevitable, she would be willing to keep an open mind provided s he is a ssure that she would be com pensated sufficiently to ful ly ..cover relocation ` in a home, on property of "our choice that meets our req' uirements." She said she to move and would refer that the City dick not Prefer y uhoc�se another option for the road which' would not' take' anyone's home. In response to a question from Cotmcilor Vessler with regard to timing o1. road construotion which would affect Mrs. ' Shrauger„ +�itgr. Engineer responded that until the "centers° arO of the proposed' p opased route CITY COUNCIL MEETING MIKES FEBRUARY 9, 1993 - PkgE l7' a • was developed, Mrs- Shrauger' s piece would be the last to be affected. In response to a question from Councilor Hawley City Engineer identified areas which are currently in or out of the City along the proposed extension route. Even though parts of the route are not within the City, all of the property is within the City's planning area. Under agreement with the county, the City has the lead role in planning which is why the City can make these decisions rather than the County. Development would occur after annexation, because the properties would need to use the City sewers in order to develop. Harold Shrauger, 13080 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon declined to testify noting his agreement with the preceding testimony. Jill Link.,' 13 050 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, OR 97223, advised she was the other home which would be affected by the Report Option. (Her home is the flag lot entering from the Shrauger property.' She said there was a time, three „,fir four years ago, when the staff option made a lot of sense because the property to t" e north of Walnut was not developed. There was going to be a an extension from. Murray Boulevard, crossing 135th Aven ue and into her rope this p p rt ; �' • Taould have been a direct route. Now, the Report Option call for a right angle turn with no free flow of traffic from the Murray Extension. Additional homes on S.W. 135th will be impacted. Walnut Street, she advised, will be the Murray Extension on through to Gaarde Street. Pis. Link said all of the new homes just developed on the north side. of Walnut have their yards very close to Walnut Street. pp, impact She did not support WPB 7 on S.W. s�rte P P neighbors option ®n lbecause of the im ac tton 132nd Avenue, She said she su. d the NPO 3 pp option, because it would out the non° -loca traffic. She acknowledged there maybe problems with the UPAA ro She noted, that t W'ashin on County was supporting the non local traffic which she' did not think the city of Tigard wants and which she knows b , "PO 3 option her neighborhood does not want The would not make S.W. 132nd Avenue a major collector. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -- rEBRUAAV , 1993 PAGE 18 • ,.0 Ms'. Link reviewed Attachuent No. 4 (Traffic Comparisons) in the Staff Report, She noted her concerns with the Report Option and the traffic counts as opposed to the NPO 3 proposal. She noted her support for local traffic and not for the promotion of business and non-local ° traffic- She noted her concerns for the neighbors on S.W. 132nd Avenue with regard to traffic should the Report Option be selected. Ms. Link asked the City Engineer a question with regard to finances. She noted the NPO 3 option was reported to cost $150 200,000 more because of the improvements and the grading. Does this estimate take into consideration the money the City would not have to spend in the purchase of Mrs. Shrauger's arid her property? City Engineer advised that this was correct, the estimate was a comparison and represents on between the alternatives what the additional cost would be. ms. Link said she was aware that this was a difficult decision for Council but asked that a decision be made soon. she said it this was an 11unbearable cloud over our heads not to Mows ...'0 She noted they bavve made $25,000 of improvements to their home and have connected to the sewer. She noted it would be hard to find an acre or more of property in the Beaverton or Tigard School Districts. She asked that if the Report Option is selected that the City take a. look at the budget • year within the next one or two years' to acquire her property while the interest rates are low and to enable theta to get on with their lives. Councilor Hawley referred to the traffic compar ist n map (Attachment No. 4) and asked Whether Ms . Link noticed that i.t would be a 750% increase in traffic Volume on S.W. 132nd Avenue* if the NPO option were selected. Ms Link said she had noticed', but did this figure because the estimate was based on an incorrect ass ption. It wad assumed that the same flow Will attempt to occur tbrough,_ the roads designated as minor collectors and at 25 mph- h She did not think that nox loca:i tra' c would be looking at this route as an option. Councilor Hawley asked the City Engineer about the timing of purchase of the of feoted property if the Report option were selected. city Engineer responded that projected completion date of the CITY COUNCIL MEETING mINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 199 GE extension was difficult to determine because the City did not know when development in this area will occur. The owners of some of the property are currently not interested in developing. Councilor Hunt asked that, if Council were to approve the Report Option, would there be any means to purchase their property now, so they would know where they stand. The City Engineer advised that the City could choose to acclutire the property for the future road and this has been done by the City in the past in similar circumstances. Joe Callan, 10935 S.W. Garden Park Place, Tigard, Oregon asked the City Engineer how wide is a maj or collector road? City Engineer) responded that typically a major collector is a 44-foot street between the curbs; it has 60 feet of right -of -way. Durham Road is 44 -feet wide, curb to curb, in addition to the sidewalks. mt. Callan said he was concerned with whether that neighborhoo d needed that wide of a street. He noted the impact to the Properties on 132 Ad Street and Gaarde Street should the road be wideled. City Engineer noted that Gaarde Street is designated as a major collector on the current neap, this proposal would not change this designation. Mr. Callan said the designation should be for a minor collector road. Couiicilor Schwartz noted the difficulty in considering new streets or enlarging streets. He maid, knowing that the City is attempting' to Plan for roads which will accommodate traffic 20 'years into the future, what would be the result if proper design or improvements were not Planned? I Councilor Hawley responded that' she lives in an area where a street design 'fdr the f=uture had not been : planned. When she moved onto 19th Avenue 10 years ago, there was very light ��traffic- She Another problems with Avenue. S�i iii 3aoted 180 homes now access 79th �r h exiting onto Durha�, Road in mornings P �orn3. and evenings. ln, addition there are hops and valleys' in the street which Makes it unsafe, especially when people do not obey the traffic p' .. seed. 79th Street is designated as a minor collector but is really only built to, a local . street standard now. C/TY COUIsiCIL MEETING 1611I MIT 8 - FEBRUARY 9 ,r 1993 iGE 20 r.w Mr. M. Finley, 11260 S.W. Gaarde Street, Tigard, Oregon decli Mr. Hegge referred to the maps and outlined some of his concerns with traffic flora and impacts to the area and whether or not the Report Option would be adequate for the future. Herman Porter, 11875 S.W. Gaarde Street, Tigard, Oregon,, advised he represented NPO 3. NPO 3 and 7 had a j oint meeting in 'December at which there was a large turnout " about 30 ( people). Two alternatives were discussed (Report Option and the NPo 3 option); the NPO 7 option had not been presented at that time',. At this lieeting, the NPO 7 members all supported the NPO 3. option. All NPO 3 members with one abs=tention, supported the NPC? 3 option. There were 20 votnsanong the neighbors. 3 supported the Report Option Mr. Porter advised there was a long history of persons wanting to connect Iurray through to Gaarde at Pacific Highway. This proposal has been on Washiigton County's Plan, Metro's plan, and is reflected in several of the options for the Western Bypass study. The City of Tigard has always opposed this connection; but becaase of Pressure he noted the UP2 A came into being, The UPAA said "we'll build a major col].ector not exactly to Murray, but pretty close; and that was the basis for aggreement • " gx, • � , cry Mx.. Porter advised the U.TP2A was a contradict a eement because if a major collector is built, you would have a road which would appear to be a minor arterial and will function as an arterial There will be a large number of people who will choose this route as the quickest, easiest connection from Tualatin, Sherwood and the whole area to Beaverton, Scholls, etc. This will become the, Westside alternative to Highway 217 even though "we don't intend it and even though it's only built with three lanes . " This will be the Preferred route until there is an arterial built farther west on Beef Bend Road over to Sherwood. last NF4� 3 meeting, porter nnotio At the �. a _:.. .. �' r noted a elt'.�'ier th s NPO 7 or ethe Re fort that � °3.f You choose P P ion th.a . : you do not complete that road, that extension of Gaarde to Walnut , until �. plan for the ' west of l the arterial Bull Mountain has been completed, so that there is an�yya1trr+�ny�ati�gve. .. to serve, as an arterial besides Gaarde Street." eet " CITY COUNCIL N STING MINUTES EBRUARY 9, 1993 PAGE 22 • re Mr. Porte" advised that the NPO 3 plan serves the community best. It represented an exiellent traffic plan for the actual area to be developed. The NPO 3 option would not encourage through traffic. Mr. Porter outlined the NPO s s proposal which would 'cut costs. With regard to Sow. 132nd Street mr. Porter noted that the Projection for full development, was 4,000 cars per day on this Street if ,the NPO 3 plan wm,5 adopted. He said that 4,000 cars per day ce,. be handled readily by the road as it is now. Gaasde, ° which is essentially the same type of road, bandies 5,000 cars a day. o6Ne have standards for collectors, and they are very sensible standards where We have new development. But, they are not at all sensible where we have already existing development. Very often, you will have development in a hilly area, where you have a variance on size on t local street because it does fit1dtheo terrain ver.,., well. Think of not.. y development where there is already houses on both sides .90 He noted his concerns to the impact to the homes on both sides of the street. It is more sensible to keep the road narrow given the circ umstances. Mr. Porter encouraged the Council to adopt NPO 3's plan not to widen S.W. 132nd Street, but allow those houses as they are and to provide sidewalks and pedestrian paths which are needed now. The NPO would like to see displaced traffic go down Scholis Ferry to 217 and then to the Beef Bend Arterial which is to be developed. Bruce Anderson, 11205 S .1. Gaarde Street, Tigard, ..d that he felt that was Oregon advise Gaarde Sheet too busy currently. said if is tly. �Ie maid that �.� tn�.s road. i. aligned to the Murray ]Extension, then the traffic would increase greaa tly on Gaarde garde Street and .... improvement to Gaarde will be required. The NPO 3 • caption would allow access to the area to be . erwise , he thought d+e''t�el.oped quite adequately nth the street should be called an arterial and b as such. He noted his concerns with the Nurray Extenzioh which is aligned entrance ,,jjam�, �! ,,T �d Wlt$1 a curved .. 135th Avenue. NPO 3 option to keep the traffic local • If a more dire He supported �Ce P to is direct r�pu . chosen, then Mr. Anderson requested that t'e road CITE' COUNCIL 4EBTING; MINUTES FE not be completed until the. Western E to assure , ;� ypaF�4 is built $e i� rough traffic from Beaverton to 217 did not ocOura` :;ouncilor Feesier asked 1'r. Anderson if he was aware of the UPAA established between Beaverton and Tigard with regard to the Murray Extension. He responded with his understanding of what the agreement _ contained. Councilor Fessler explained that the UPAA is part of the Regional Transportation plan. Tigard also has an agreement with Beaverton and Washington County, which states there will be no connection between Murray Boulevard to S.W. 135th until the Western Bypass or a southwest corridor (over Beef Bead Road) is provided. Council comments: Councilor Schwartz, noted the difficulty of the and issue and the of times related issues have ' e number been reviewed in the ast few P Years by Council. Councilor Schwartz noted similar concerns by neighbors when Durham Road was improved. He consented that, despite the concerns, the final outcome was positive and the increased traffic impacts had not been felt as much as had been anticipated. He noted that the Gaarde Street extension has been identified on the trans ortaton p plan for the region for many years. He cited the need to plan; • • • traffic and to expect traffic from adj oiningj urisdictio_ g� ns. Councilor Schwartz advised he supported the Report Option. • Councilor Hawley agreed with several of the points made by Councilor SchiliTarticZ . She noted her concerns with the impact to the existing homes tinder each of the three options. She advised of the responsibility ity to plan ahead for tra::�fic impacts. In reviewing the three options, she said she favored the Report Option because it appeared to disrupt fewer �. eez�en� and ro ert She noted UPAA P �! p y owners. ted the of eo � �► pie are s�csatent�.ng l on us to be responsible � and ' ro u safe... traffic P ids, efficient and the circuitous rotates o - i f is I�o�Tement.. fr She noted she liked p y both the Y+D and 7 options, th t Proposed � bo CITY COUNCIL !CETI= = UTHS FEBRUARY , 1993 PAGE 24 •r CITY Councilor Hawley acknowledged the plea for a decision to provide certainty on this issue for people who want to plan their future and to ]kx OW how or if their property will, be affected. In responseo: a question from Councilor Fessler, City Engineer advised that the County noted that any of the three alternatives could be designed to meet their standards and comply with the UPAA. However, ' the County favored the ` Report Option. Councilor Fessler reviewed the NPO options and how she thought they could possibly work. Shoe, also noted, however, that she would not want to jeopardi8e the fulfillment of the agreements made in the UPAA. She said that because the Report Option appeared to affect the least amount of Property- owners, she was leaning toward supporting that option. 1f compromises could be made on the 132nd Street' proposal, she advised she would possibly would consider the NPO 7 option. Councilor Huht noted his empathy for the people who live on Gaarde Street and advised his propel^ty abuts Durham Road. He noted that there was impaict to his area when the road wasp widened; however 0 he advised, it was the right thing to do. He outlined his reasons for the need to, plan for increasing traffic and summarized what he saw as the ` needs in the future for S.W. 13 2nd Avenue. He said he noticed 'g • p the area. Councilor Hunt advised he believed there was as enough information presented and the Council should make; a decision on the issue tonight. Mayor Edwards advised he supported the Report Option. He noted his concern for the two Property y owners who will be displaced with this option. . ' based the Report optionywas based nh the fact pthat its eared to .P PP. comply with the UPAA and long-range planning. He advised of his concerns that 132nd Street would be suitable as a collector street. tlayor Edwards advised that, he was not prepared to promise. iutmediate Purchase M of the two affected parcels; however, he . said he would not rule out consideration of a property pUrohase. Staff 'Re co r menclation: City Engineer Feeley advised,' ' fiat the staff recommended adoption; of the Report Option, CO Cit, MEETING tmiums FEBRUARY 9, 1903 FOR PUblic hearing was closed. • Notion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to direct staff to prepare the appropriate ordinance in support of the Report Option alignment. • The Mayor asked for questions. Councilor Hawley asked if the motioncr cared to put anything in his motion to consider the options of property purchase. After discussion, it was determined that options for property purchase would be contained, in the findings which would accompany the proposed crdinance. Mayor Edwards advised that, at the time the ordinance is presented to Council, there would be an opportunity to address side issues, such as property purchase. Also, there would be an opportunity for Council to refine/amend the findings. Counciles r Hunt noted his support �f or giving so me assurances to the property owners about when they could expect their property to be purchased. Councii:or "Fer,4sler noted her agreement with Counoiler Hunt ®s comment. Mayor Edwards called for a vote on the motion. The motion passed by a unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Edwards; Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Fessler and Schwartz voted in favor of the motion.) :. Mayor Edwards advised that the record should reflect that a tentative decision aad been reachad, the ordinance and findings would be presented to Council for their consideration on March 23, 1993. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Cancelled. LTRNNEtTT,: 10 :38 p.m. order CITY COUNCIL MEEirima MINUTES 'EBRU } ARY °- . 9 , X99 � PAC E NOTICE OF PROPOSED Cir IAN Must be sent to DLCD 45 days prior to the final hc.r�rinr� ; S -3e OAR 660-,18-,020 - Jurisdiction CITY OF TIC Date " Mai ]l'ed I D- Z 1 -' -Z.-- • Local File. Mu tuber CPA 92-0007 Date Set for Final Heari.ng on, Adoption s DECE ER • ti 1992 Month Day Year • 7.30 p.m.i, WAIN HALL, CITY OF TIGARD Time and Place for Hearing :� 13125 SW HALZ,' BLVD., TIGARD, OR Type of Proposed Action (Check all that apply) Comp ehens ive • Land Use Plan Amendment Regulation Amendment Please Complete (A) for Text Ameaadtents and (3) for Map Amend ents A Summary and Pulrpose of Proposed Action (Write a brief description of the proposed action.. • Avoid highly technical terms and stating "see attached" . ) A REQUEST FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPROVAL TO THE TIGARD "S C iPRE SIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN MAP WHICH RELATES. TO THE FUTURE ALIGNMENT OF A COLLECTOR STREET CONNECTING. S.W. in1ALNUT STREET AN. S.W. GMRDE STREET. Map , Following. area to For Man �'�c�oew�.t3ePa�Dnsh�:etn necessary. each area n¢��. use be changed, separate g a h tax lot number alone.): current ` Proposed Plan ' Designation Plan l�es�ga�at�+.�n'. � -� Current Zone: • Proposed : Sid done. NA Location: NORTHEAST SIDS BULL MOUNT /UN (_,,,,NEST AND S.W. GAANDE STREET, SO H.O ` WALNUT STREET 'AM EAST OF S.tl. M. i` Acreage Invoiv 4:: or pesidentia.Velianges 1Pleasie pe w the Mange, in Density in Utlts ,Per Teti Acrc4 + k &,a t Statewide Goals" Which Nay Apply to) the 'proposal % .. • c r . ' L ' wY ' k R List any State or Federal. Agenis. • Gov= t' ® YNa$l 'Special, Service Districts Ifirai.e,h way, be Interested ' nror" Impacted' j::, Proposal. WASHING= COUNTY LANDUSE D T't NSPC ATICN Direct Questions and Comments To RANDY WOOLE1 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGRD" OR 97223 (Phone) (503) 639-4171 Form and,' Please Attach Three (3) • .Ceap�o„cs ; of e � Pr® • • a31.• to this Hail. To De P artment of Land ,Conservation and Development 1175 our .Street, Salem, Dragon 97310-0590 NOTE: If moTe copies of .this , forit" are .needed,, , please' contact the D[�C9 office at 373-0050, or this _form may be duplicated on green ' paper • atutes:. re wire y " p ,. p to Please t,e ° adv�.sed that st t'taeuct o a ro osal to be provided A .general description of tende d action is nosufficient. = Proposed plan and °;,land } ula► io ,a endr, eats. must, be .sent to DECD at least 45 • days prior :' to the final hearin ' 4 (See OAR 660- 18 -020) x„ ' ��rl $r�,�oty�� w W �.