Loading...
CPA1990-00008POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. STATE OF OREGON County, of Washington City of Tigard 4YE ereb, oertify Please Print) c.t31r for the Cit of Tigard, Oregon.l of Which the attached is a copy s 19" by mailing toy each named persons on the day of a of dress shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit 8), said f .them at a� notice ' is hereto attached, and desposi'Ced in' the United States Mail on the ., day 1 of Ce -A 19 _ (� a postage prepaid , �� it'iiiittlllt't,r, 1.2 tiA 10 1, .+w< +r 7,10,10g.9.7A i otta and sworn to before me this s.. ay of ,�41 , , f. A. ,1,,, (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following Notary Public of Oregon My Commission Expires: lied Notice /Deli eyed to Post Office Subsct^rbed and sworn to before' me this day of rbo;nad,0a.w,, -Notary Poll ic of Oregon kti o w� � S � . My Commission Expire S: O tTY OI TIGARD Wa`= hington County, Oregon HOZ/CB OF FINAL ORD :; - By cZ° �. Concerning Case vusr ( ®) : Pik ® -11D�Ak/ 9 T , �9; 0- 008 . Address of Property Street Hap No( 38C0 Tax has and Lot Y�o ) o • 2��1 1�tC tax lot • Recipe t: A request for a ComPrehensive Plan Amendment from Prof ssional to Light :industrial- A1 ;.:o reqUested Change from C-P (Commercial Profe &aional) to X -P Park) ZONE: (Commercial Professional) 6 Action :. ?.pproval asie requested Approval with conditions Denial • Notice: Notice public sed in : the nswepaper, posted at City Nall and mailed to: t The applicant and owner(c) O rriere of record wf thin the required distant: :it _ The affected Neighborhood Planning organisation • Affected governmental a ancies ▪ Pi al �e .s�ian: D CIsIDN W 1 =WIND BECOMES p EFFECTIVE ON y�.nr 7ns�we� sm:i�m�+ The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from th r Planning ,anning Dep r nt, Tigard °Lt 126 Ball, �all� 1� ► P.O. , Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. A review of this decieioa may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Um a Board of Appeals (LA) according to their Procedures.' 93gMUUEIMIILL If You Recorder at 639 -4171. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS' AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE ,A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY THE W. L. xccoRz4AcK CO. (CPA 90.0008, 2014 990 -0008) . WHEREAS;, the applicant has 'requested a Comprehensive Plan "Amendment, troz Professional Commercial, to .L9.ght Induetrial'' and a Zone Change from C -P to Z -:ii* nd WHEREAS, the P1Inning staff made recommendation of findings to the city Tig rd P! anning Commis ion at a public hearing on October 401990; and fi5, the Tigard city Cogan oil. held a public hearing on the roped changes: on October 22; 1990 t® review ■Planning et f f and Planning Commission i'recommendationS as well s p ubl is testimony NOW T -'. REFORcs', THE CITY OF VICARS) 0ABA/ws As FOLLOWS: :SECTION 1: The P r,oposal id capn ®i ®rent with all relevant Criteria baDed upon the facts, findings, and conclusions ao ed bolow: • ,PACTS General Information Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 90 -0008 Bone change ZON 90.0001 • Q4 ST: 1. Plan map aiuendment from a ou ercia1 Professional to Light Inds etrta1 o 2. .®n® ciaMg ® from c P (Professional Commercial) d i st rict to I-11 (Industrial Park) zoning district, • PLICA T: W. L McCormack AGY NT: 7415 Fairway Loop Wilsonville, OR 97070 OWN! c Same LOCATION: ckcaazi.e /Saito A s ®o. (Lane Stout) 0690 SW Bancroft Street PCT+ Box 69039 Portland, OR 97201 -0029 Sorxtheaet corrtea of SW 72nd Avenue + and SW `:Sandbu rg Street' PROPERTY DESCRIL TION: WcTM 2S1 1DC, Tax Lot 3800 Baclkground information The ,plan for NPO 5 'Wag adopted by the City .count :11 on ` ugnat 22,, 1917. The Plan and corresponding zoning de ,tions s nct d forte ale o� the subject 4 tte were Industrial Q: 1- J • 'Sandbus,�g Street and Heavy Industrial (M-2) on the south side,. Both', of these zoning districts, allowed for both commercial office and industrial uses During the city-wide 'review of, the eio prehensive Plan in 19874 the zoning for ,; the subject ' property, along ` with eevera;l other parce...s receiving access from 3andburg Street, was changed to C -P" (Commercial Professional) . Along with the chancia in n~a p deli cation,, the list of permitted uses in the C -P zone was reduced. The, C -P zone does ' not allow 'industrial, mice that were previously allowed . i in the former 2M -2 zone.; In September, 1.35,, the City Council reviewed a proposed, Plan Map rodesignation of 21 tax • lots that receive access, Sandberg Street from Commercial Pro3:ese .anal to Light Industrial, and a zOne change from C -P to I -P. The Council approved the redesign =:tien for only . 7 of the parcels, not incle•,3,1,neg the ei ,: eject property (CPA 5-85). on July 3, 1990, the Director's , designee pproved request by the current applic =: nt for Site Development Review approval to redevelop the existing 14,432 square foot . of fice/storage building on this site for administrative offices for a con;atruction engineering and management firm and to allow construction of an approximately 13,000 square foot f lex- ✓space building on the east aide . of the ` parcel (SDR 90-0012). Redevelopment of the site in accordance with this application is currently under ways No other land use or development cent app1,icai;.ians involving the subject parcel have been reviewed by the City of Tigard. 3 c�.i1i y �Y11� ®ri�pt ,.olt1 Properties to the north and south are else` zoned C -P and contain a varx. a zoned' '1�- -? and �t of office ice ne�r�r � pr, c •rose to the east are ` soar: include a variety of industrial susses. The adjacent parcel to the east contains the Gould 2umP Company. Across sW 72nd Avenue from the subject site Is a vacant parcel that, is zoned a -P which is a :part, of ti Industrial . p the tie ie zoned ar --P and � Presently contain single- faaraily residences or are vacant. sW 72nd Avenue abutting the site is a 44 -foot wide paved major, i storm o drainage. A collector street .heatt includes cu�..�® and s sidewalk g does not exist on either side of the street. SW Sandbur street abutting the site is a fully improved on 9' y p local 'street with Sidewalks Toth sides. Site information. and Prraoos al De_ ecr at M� The 1.8 acre parcel presently ccietainel the 14,432 square foot combination office/storage A parking' °T lot containing ion of f i �/sto parking �p t►ulcii. >_y � the north side ; of the approximately One a access driveway connects the located parking lot with s Sandburg Street. tains a lar e; amount of mat parcel. titre ' landscaping The site �aan g . frontage of the, including ,.. several large trees along the SW 72nd Avenue Site and Several oak tree along Sandbu:>*g Stree� ORDINANck ego. 5(D -.; Page • The applicant im` in the "proce ®e of r odelling the ,exieting building, into an fficaa building fear a . construction nnanagement and' engineering. f Approarimately 4, ® ®C" Square " feet of the existing, storage' area is to be modified for loaeing to another use. The : appl`icanec ale® hae begun 000 = trust ion of a new 14,000, square foot s� n le .et ®rip f1 a -sg ce building on thcEa east .aid of : th e p'arce].. The `project ' f.nclude exparn ®ion of the existing pa�urking area' to a€araround " the exi ting building ! adding 25 aadditionaasl apaacea. Ttzo ne s acs -as driveways firom Sandburg Street to , the packing lot will ]tie Larovided along, with a;loeure of the e4ating 4rivewa . Alano jto bye aonetructed ia3 a new driveway .sand true axoa aeuverin�g area an the faatr eastern edge of the aaite to serve a number of overhead do' a; on .the iaew flex -apace building ae well as -the cff'ic- building to the senth The applicant request a plan asap Amendment from Co Toi"w.1 Professional' to Light Industrial and a Zone Change from the C -P ( Professional) zoning district to 1 °P (Industrial Parka grdist Parcel. �, fitted a zoning a li��nnt haaa; n district for the 1. g acre ara�ol. The statement titled 2r+ oc►s or a C 'ehenaive Plan 2 mendmeti and Zone Chanjj L. McCormack end ggimany. The primary intent of the request is to broaden the number of poaeible uses allowed in the development. Ag212cy and dam ►rs rtsa The gagineering Division ham reviewed the proposal and s ' 14'e1 the following comments: a e The s already P, parking and a 3.t� -, is �l,r ®ad developed with eyed building. ,The requested rezoning will Inot require any additional Public facilities. As described In the applicant's submittal, substantially less vehicles per day would; be expected from potential used in the proposed zone ace comP ared to, traffic veneration aunt icipat from ui ea permitted under ` the eztating zoning. Furthermore, subatantial.1y leas traffic during yak periods is tYPioallir as ociated with most industrial u ®ea `ae compared to typical office uses. The Engineering Department has no Ob jecti on to i the rezoning P;ropa The Building Division, !Tualatin Valley Fire and Bascule District,, Tigard watell, District, General. Telephone, and 'GE have re'uie+ C& the proposal '. and have offered no co ent° or co;nctione. No other' co ncerto have been received. FINDINGS AND CCNCLi eIDNS The applicable criteria in thin can Staat+ :ide Planning al°, and 12; COmprehen8ive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4a 2. ORDINANCE KO. J Page 3 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, €3.1.1, 8.1.3, 12.2.1, 12.3.1 (locational criteria i!or the Light : Indu�trial , plan designation) ; and 'the change or mistake quasi - Judicial, plan map amendment criteria of both the comprehensive plan sd community heveloprneni: Code. In addition, 'the proposed redesignation hoa uid the purpose section for requested 7X -P zoning be a: con ®is�t�ent with t?n g � the districts. tat ®wl.d® P1annct in Goals The Planning Division concludes ,that the proposal is consistent with tkne applicable statewide Planning Goals' based upon the following findings: . Goal #1 `citizen Involvement) is 19atiefied , because, the City has adopted a citizen involvement program including review of all land use and dev'elol lent applications by Neighborhood Planning Organizations (NPOe) , NPO a has been informed of the application and has provided with the oppottunity to comm addition, on the propos 1. - In , all public notice requirements related to this application have been t.atisfied. . doah. 02 (Land Urge Planning) is satisfied because the City has applied all applicable statewide Planning s';o . is, City of 'igaar , tlompreheneive Plan Policies, and Co unt$ D a to the y i,�'ements� i wail. ,. ,��t C®de � review of this proposal. . Ga el *9 (Economy of the State) is eatief Led because the proposed redesignaation would increase the CitY's inventory of 'developable industrial land on a parcel .which is well suited for °inchtetrial u®e. 'The City has recently a .Preo ed concerns with its 1.imited amount of developable and /or 1 :dab le industrial hands in the w ity' a review a of a proposed plan amendment/icon change for Spieker Par1.a, ere further south on SW 72nd Avenue at SW Lower So ones P C� -0004) . The City council approved that application �redeai Road aating 6.6 : acres from y industrial to commercial plan and zoning designations 'though the Council indicated a desire to maintain a sufficient developable industrial land base. The present 7rrspoeal would Partially replace the industrial land Lost through the Spie&er r designation. E . Goal *12 (Tr naeport!.tio'.4) is satisfied because the proposed 1 -P deaignat4:oi,1 is not anticipated to resu t in 3n increase in site generated traffic, as described further under Policy 8.1.1, which follows. Plan Policies staff has determined that the proposed Pian MaP Amenndmant /Zone Ctiang-s is consistent' with the Comp r ehensive Flar based a cn ". � fin dings below: 1. Plan Pc 1icy 2.1.1 is sat Jai Led , because , Neighborhood Tel,anning g t .. surrounding .w were given no c of Oar a�3.'ta�� ion �5 and related to the�ro et. own®a.s we the 1 n addition, n hearing was . g d; ias announced on a the n �l. is hearing r ' Public �h g Published ;In the "�'i amxcd Timed aa#n sign placed on the site. O1 UINANCE NO, 33,io- Page 4 • iy 9 Plan .Policy 4.2.1 is satisfied since the site .° 1 wr rovementE ha:a've been reviewed through `` the city ° e development ' review and bufl4ing Permit prose 13ses . and have, been shown to comply with applicable federal, state, and regional water seal ..ty requirements, including preparation aas d iaplem station of a noon -point source. .pollution control plan and compliance with the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission's rules for the Thalatin River Basin. The prolg►osed redesignaation, with resulting changes in the uses which might occupy the site, would not affect compliance with to sae Plan Policy. • Plan Policy 4.3.1 is implement d : through the development review process, in which building Placenlent and landscaping have been reviewed wed with respect to minimizing noise impacts of use of the site upon adjacent land uses. No significant noise impacts would be expected due to light industrial use of the property as compared to commercial use peranitt -d under the existing zoning. The Parcel does not abut typical noise sensitive uses such as residences, schools, day care facilitie or retirement homes. • Plan Policy 5.1.1 is satisfied belaause this proposal would enhance the :1::1: nic diversity of the Tigard area. The subject property is located a transition area between Predoininantly office uses to the north and industrial uez-s to the ecuth.' The 1-P zone will allow the existing approved site developments to ,^ ccoss adate a variety of uses more consistent with the nature of the surrounding area than would ha allowed under the C P . Plan Policy 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, and 7.6.1 are satisfied because a full mange of public service are currently Provided to this site. Lervice Providing rE viow agencies h- vex not raised any issues regarding their ability to provide service to this site ,f the Plan and zoning designattors are changed. • Plan Policy 8.1.1 in satisfied because the proposed redesignation could decrease the d mend on the public roadway system generated by u; es on the property, depending u poz the occupants of the bUildings, as assessed utilizing the institute of T raffi c Engineers Manual. The applicants have provided the foilgwthe Elite date traffic znalYsis, comparing projected trip generation using and basic, trip generation pro jsction a s I mite area iiiii.6•6444064.1,4.440.6 100200 square feet 41,02 acre). huildIng area ..... m .. m .... 27,400 square fast - P tr: P generation ......... 520 vehicles Per day ( 1�� code 110) ] -P trip generation ........ 241 vehicles per day (T. Coe e 110) They above analysis indicates that the Plan /zone change zeeested would, not be expected to cignifie antly affect the transportation System and could seven result in at decreases in the potential: for vehicle trips by � ,.. �� mesa► allcawed b ea�wtead ener�ated b indusatrial 1 sae et the ropertli under tine desk, nations as compared , tom. typical comrnearciaal� x y curre+lit designations . orwi`\L•'lltlCE $10. 90- Page 5 t Plan Policy 8.1e3, is satisfied since all necessary public tr'eet improvements are in place and have been assess .d for auf ficiency o for serving the existing ' and proposed site i developments through the Site Development Review and Building Permit processes. Plan Policy 12°2.3. provides locati;"nal criteria for cercial Plan designations. The commercial - Professional Plan designation .criteria indicate that site suitability, infraatructur -, and adjacent land uses are till* key elements in locating commercial - Professional areas. High visibility is a site characteristic which' is not 'a quality exhibited by he ubJect site. Of particular note is the site's location, existing demrelopment, and surrounding . uses which are not definitiveay Commstci =1- Professional in nature. The property therefore might not be properly designated wit': the existing commercial-Professional Plan •desigatione ° Plan Polic y 12.3.1.b provides' locatianal ' criteria for Light Industrial Plan designations. The Pro 141 forl a S-- Paean' Amendment and Zone Chan e ._.._... a.__1 of these L. e city Council enerall� concurs W. � l��hoa and. os�a n addresses each with thin ,� criteria on Page.. 3. city '� analysis and borrows lileral3,i from the applicant in ,pri,bv►idifg th6 following findings. The loca: ;_nal criteria are noted in caPital letter,:. y b. SITES FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT OH ALL BE . FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS To ASSURE. THAT PRIVA AND 1. BUFFERED THE . RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER, OF THE AREA IS PRESERVED. The only residential p u a n the vuc The of tD"�B c�ential edevelo e� i COMMENT: a to the northwest ac�roae S' 72nd liven a proposed redesignation and industrial csa of this site would not bO anticipated to impact this reside :.t3„ al area due to the separation of these aea®, that is provided by SW 72nd Avenue land because the buildings a»a� p ciin�e on the subject P erty and traffic areas are' set back some distance from the streetss» 2. LOCATED ON AN ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR STREET AND THAT ID DSTR /AL TRAFFIC SHALL NOT BE CHANNELED THROUGH RESIDENTIAL, TRAFFIC mss The site has access to SN' 72n d Avenuea, a major collector street, via SW Sandburg' Street. Neither of these streets channe traffic through residential ar ®as. ,e y. BE Od�1, A SIZE H E , ILL PROVIDE FOR THE A SITE �'FH�imyCi BE VF, A SI:�DI. �; SHAPE ltlt3i.4wL� Y9 8'ti SHORT AND LANG RPNG•E! NEEDS OF THE USE." 1 cOY7ME i i The Site can accf�mma +.at,e the existing uses as Well .$ i a .. . trie�'il uses within the confines of th Irote�ne:� >aal future Indus buildings" sizes. ORDINANCE NO. 9O- Page 6 0A a�. ✓M sp .. THE LAND INTENDED FOR DEVELOPMENT SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE SITE TOPOGRAPHY OF LESS THAN 6 PERCENT GRADE OR THAT IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THROUGH ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES ALL 'LIMITATIONS To DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROVISION OF SERVICES CAN BE MITIGATED.°' CO PNT The site's grades have been taken into consideration in the site development plans such that extensive grading was not reT,tired for the current construction on the property. The site grading pi ns have previously been ,approved by the city of Tigard Building Division. a. IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT ASSOCIATED LIGHTS, NOISE, AND O'C'HER EXWERNAL AFFECTS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE ACTIVITIES AND USES ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. G'g:NTe_ Surrounding "properties are developed with office ; and industrial uses which are largely conoi wtent with the typed of uses that would be permitted on the snub /ject, property under the requeiated Light Industrial Plan and I-P zoning designations. Existin landscaping and building setbacks should reduce the P g Potential for light and noise impacts and other potential coxaf lictO with adjacent u _ es. I. ' Zonino T .at The PurPoaa statem nt for the I P zoning district states ` gnat the cone is intended .. . for combining light manufacturing: office and complimentary , related commercial uaes .. for combining uses which have no off -site impacts in terms of noise, odo ', glare, lights, vibration, Smoke, du - t, or other types of off -site iwpacts fear combining parking, landscaping and other design features which physically and visually aid stru. turea and uses within one development . which prohibit resid &ntial use .... which utilize a basic street and utility pattern which will Permit flexibility in the size of i ntiusttial r ites which provide for a circulation system that proides 4±.recf access to arterials or collectors that will not channel tr &f2i. through system residenti = 1 areas .... which ut;ll,is®r an internal circulation which connect to adjoining: sit s.... which provide the complete set of pre-imposed restrictions (e.g., deed restrictions, re:is rictiOn of tvonaZts, etc.) that are enforceable upon all occupants of the industrial park including provisions for site improvement, building design, landscaping, sign control, off - street parking, and site htuai.ntenaince .... which provide evidence of continuing management respons3ihility to, enforce restrictions established upon the original development plan and Which recognize the differing transportation requirement® of the employees and Service Vehicles w tth ades ate provision for public transit access." The pp _ V' po statement in the Pro s3 for the Comorehen cant h ?,.� adc�r seed this �P .a� se st � ee��►n siv Plana .Amendment and 2c ne khan e statement included wit h. the applicatie . The Council. c�cncurs with the applic, nt n assessment ment of the ORDINANCE NO. Page 7 y wn the proposed redeaignati.on and the purpose statement. consistency b®twe Existing and planned site improvements should be able to accommodate a variety of industrial and office uses that will be consistent with toe use and performance standards applicable to the zone. The entire site is planned to be operated as a single unit in a manner consistent with adjacent properties. The site and surrounding area is nonresidential in character. y pattern The site has access to a The street and unlit attern is establieflaedn collector street that will direct traffic to other collector and arterial streets without routing traffic through residential neighborhoods. The subject site and an adjacent parcel, the Rey '''1.1nk parcel to the south, share an access, drive one SW Sandburg Street. Tho subject site is under a single ownership which should ensure appropriate maf.ntenance of the entire) site and its buildings. Finally, Tnf. -met route 38 provides bus :- ervice to this site on STEM 72nd Avenue. Change or._Mistake In order to approve a qua si- judicial amendment to the Plan and zonin`" maps, the city must also find evidence of a ohaltige in the neighborhood or community which affects the parcel. Alternatively, Lao City must Blind that there was a mistake or in conssIstency with regard to the designs aatiol of the parcel (Comprehensive Plan, Volume I3, Policy 1.1.1, Implementation *,trategy Two; Community Development Code, Section 18.22.040.a). __c__.__ in this report, the area Ass snoted under ' bac�c�rround 'inforisaaa�tion ca��Irlier within which the site is located was studied by the City in 1985 and the area was partially rezoned to I -P in response to concerns that most of the actual land uses were not consistent with the C -P zoning in effect at that time. Although the building on this parcel has somewhat of an industrial character, the use of th s property at that time was predominantly an > office - type use that would not have been a permitted use in the I-P zone; hence the property's former owner preferred to retain the C -P zoning. The C -P zoning of this parcel, as well as a few other properties in the are =., was r,ttainec!l in order to avoid making the uses of those properties non - conforming, uses. The recent sale of the subject property to the current owner has precipitated a desire to More accurately plain and zone the property with regard to the character of the site improvement and the surrounding area. It is likely that we may Bee similar regnetits for the other C-P properties in this tra nsitiora:;s1 area as tenants turn over to mf.lre industrial us , s.' This history of events indicates that the City, previously perceived a mistake in the original plan /zone designations in this area and if the property owner at that time had desired, this site likely 'would have been rezoned to I -P in 1985. This condition continues to exissi; with a building' of industrial character abutted by similar developments to the east that are already zoned I -P Therefore, it is clear that a mistak0 was made in the original designation end that I_P' is a more approp' late designation to reflect the transitional nature of the area between the office uses` to the north and industrial use6 to the South. 2: The City Council ��CT1C1I� y cil concurs with the Planning Commission an : ' d staff recomutendations and approves the request to redesignate the parcel iliusstrat -4 ORDINANCE NO. 90- Page SECTION. 3: , This ordinance shall . lbe � f +active.. on and after t after ite 'pae age by the councilb ci,k6rOval, by the Mayor ecorder. PASSED y dr.q Yi1 US S vote of LJ1.1, council 'me, abers present after be read by number and title only, :this a ehir ® Q.�"1�. -' , 1990. the:inn `. Wheatley, Ci y Recorder APPROVED: This is ��L day of ,.5irli+WN!bor , .7, �► Gerald R. Eda axc Proved ate:, 0 form e ii /.1 / < / /i�v<J<J!//✓l //, /1/ ! /< /IP /J /// ! / /!!JI! 132 132 92 4' X ? -±ivi7 , s Pcz r14.1 -:, t a {7 -1�� ri 1 $ - • rte; to - o j ;i sd 814.14 13Z 3T9:� �" E 50'. �p� +add s 01® 230 410r 342.2` _ 132.O �• ® ®° ®3� cn, 24` � �r/ rririiiiriiriiviiu ,!•iriiiiiv� /il --s,. iritr�r .:, . = 83��i i 40• 1YI� � ,� 2AST.GRAHAM 0 t.0 8.0 rr <riiirirrr iris` catiirrir�iiirriiii ririiirli�iiiiii t 1 Was �4 r _w ∎' ° '��_ o k+ , s o `lt S3 -S79 w t�; 110:- 472 '330.02 - 20Q.i7 '"�•wwili4i. a. riiiii///4 //// //r///// / /liairi�iii/// , _0 o �, K O� ° =42 2 1423[ = g O r/!/72 r!!I /r / /lrrlrlr!!/ /1 _ N O3 °` :3 Pi 03p) E $4q p 43 (G - i:. j G4'.fi c t • 5* . r R- 0 ~ •r 4- I 0 : ` ' fie.' � il' r 's< u. � r � • - IAA +,U f s ✓ T _. 'w? 4 r4 d vJ - j�y�� _ - �/ :� •4 c. G - - z zit }{ yy z �. • _ • _ , I ii errci 111 (�!_ :� - < :, x ,� 3 0 - �� f.4 VI 3.r♦f ' l� � qi 0 s � -_ !(q t r .p • 4f- Q ® = -f "� ; EASEMENT S?.--443020 Gfr 1� �+t �<•� �-_�, �` _ , ,- -� - �. "° '� o o -34.6. .dam. vn 0. E1�' `-? • td:. '� , ,C! 19450 S'0 2» E: U ®1 it 239.94: LEGIBILITY STRIP EMT 17. eclirs-----e•.; 41, # • . a a 'Is\ 40.• se* •• 8 , 0400.600 006 C.0.8 El •8 0 a 6 st • A to. o 0• 0 6 • , - Cs • 0- 4 6 • * 4 • • • • • * li'. Al • A. 0,41 • a e e a o g 4 a e e 040°6-4 NIE°A.: 0 0 0 0 441 t 0 - VI aCe0s. • ' • : 42 6434 4 1 t 6 a a ..' ---' ee a 46 010 .4.6E4e4, a Ai SOSO. Y -00h.11,41111.9 AVE. • IL 2 gl e efg i 1 21 ea le ' 23 . . 4 _ 2 A • IL W.L. MCCORMACK 7415 FAIRWAY LOOP WILSt WILLE I OR 97070 "SANS STOUT NACKENZIE -SAITO & ASSOC.: Pt) BOX 69039 PORTLAND OR 97070 et,!rtd,, ea Vhat art a a City of Tigard* Oregon., , That, I Served:N(71'1W or ‘1! served NOTICE N DECISIO I sery 1. City of Tigard Plan Tigard Planning Ccutein Tigard tilutatiiiga Officatr'-. Council TI,gard City 4 ft4"4.411 is attadhedA lic Hearitg of itshich Exhibit .*A") brza miaza, to each named Mions at the address sb at-Lauded list mar)...4,4 exbibit B. on the Jj day of raid notice ?CE DECISIoN as beret ttachade was postd on an appropriate and but,letin board ca ties- , day in ith0 thifited States Mai t on that *, y pest:1,kge prepaid. tied"re''.'Nftntf, ,,,,icelf2511112A:altPM2. , it-oorniaffirm to eta oh the / — 41y Of iC Or iIiGc metal Expir.ss ! OTIrJ IE BERBBY'' OI"%EN THAT'!. THE , TI T' C0W CIL, 'AT 'IT8' FlSE "INCA ` ON , MOND LL ' WILL C�87ZDER THE ` FOLLOWING APPLTCAT �fl. HALL ©F THE:', TIt ARD CIVIC CEN' 1312a Ski: 'HALL BL' , TYGARD, .OR�tiON WI IOri FILE >' TITLE a A 90- 0008 /ZON 90 -0008 . MaC :rw ok APPLICANT: W.L. McCormack 7415. SW Fairway Loop Wileonvi1169 OR 97070 REQUESTS 8 C01�1PRg NB„ I � Z° .C. , 0. 08 :. . ,NJ,���"c N948�_ Q7 90+-OOC �.1.� MBCORLj 15) A req�txeet fo►r a Coin rehbn®i Pien Am nd� +ent f.Xom Co trcial ProfeSe .onai !!P,' Light Indus ria1. Alev ragtueated ie �', zone Change from C -P ( Corrrarrerial Prof•i tonal) (Industrial 0600. ZONE: (0)1 rc al Pr "bfsk��iionai:)' LOCATION' Southeast corner of E1 72nd Avenue and SW San db raj Street 1DC,' tax lot 3800) (See Map On Rovers* Side) (If TM,2t3 THE ' PUBLIC FARING 'ON' THIS TITTER 'WILL Bb Co1DUCTED IN ICCOPD :WITH T RULES OF CHAPTER; 18 3 32 AF THE COMMUNITY' . DEVELOi' "MENT CODE AND RULES OF PROGEDUI ,,. AT C T%�E '�CIGARD CxTY COUNCIL ' AND` �1'VfiIIiE�t%E '.S HASP Ali IY�1'Ei R8- I RUEE�� PROCEDURE SE's° FORTH IN OHAPTEF 18•., 30 ANY PERSON Vii' � - I�RITIfiI RATTER MA,Y rTTNND AND B$ HE D, ".OIL THSTIMONY' SAY BE SUPMT'ITED IN � . O TC ENTERED INTO' THE RECORD P'URT _ _ CT THE CITY I381�►"�RDER OR 1 a 1312 5 SW r. ►L B._ �... I iARU �P M 9 ?DgP1 TPSICNT " FOR 639 -4H71, TI ARDTCi'TYFL$A8'` C�EY�'9�'A W I .. b , ��° �► 233. bkm /CPA90 -08 BIU( 261011 *-03 3 0',d: 0.0 •oa0 +aa • 2S101DD -O,01 a s aaoosoi•saa a ••■•• . RID POBLIt 71011S 1 ' 6960 SW 15/01i17,4111003 STYSZT TICMW an 39323 at I served `3CS .OF , DECISION City of Tigaxd P11 ✓Tigard `Planning; CLSa ..rte •, Tigard . Bear nge officer Tigard' City Council, �► '' (Public Bear , Notiiss/Hotic of peals a attaahod q , Exhibit "Ail was(' aail id to each- nand . persons at the a on t e attached list � �rked exhibit "H" on the Iday . a`� �° � = ,��;;: 19 1 , said notices NOTICE OF DECISION as h n attached, was po ed on an apps update bulletin board on thn , _- day of . 19 teda in ` the U n i t e d States Hail on the ` i 2 . - day 00 postage prepaid. Pere n who del vexed to _POST' OFFI+: subs oribed and sworn/affirm u 'me on I OTAflY Puma= OP OREGON Sy Co mioeion ' Expires: toil- A " NOTICE O'F PU � NARING' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COlMfISSIOII, AT ITS MEETING ON DAY, O, ctI 7 TIGARD CIVIC CENTER. 13125 1�, AT 3 PM, IN T� TOWN HALL OF THE TIG 5 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLL0NrWs APPLICATIONS FILE NO.: CPA 90- 0008 /ZON 90 -0008 FILE TITLE: W.L._ McCormack APPLICANT: W.L. McCormack 7415 SW Fairway Loop Wilsonville, OR 97070 OWNSR: i Sam) REQUEST: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 'AME MENT CP 90 -0008 ZCNB CHANGE 0. 90-0008 McCO (NPO #5) A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Commercial Professional to Light Industrial. Also requested ie a Zone Chang Chang0 from C -P (Commercial Profeanionat) to I -P (Industrial Park) ZONE: (Commercial Profeeeiona9, ) LOCATION: Southeast corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Sandburg Street `GTCTM 281 1DC, tax lot 3800) (See Map On Reverse Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS HATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ANO RULES OF PROCEDURE LABLE AT CITY ' HALL, OR RULES OF PR BY PLEDURE SET�FOR�.'HNCITY COUNCIL AND A�'AI CHAPTER 18.30. ANY PERSONS RAVINt INTEREST IN THIS NATTER IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED MINTO THE RECORD OHEARD, HE REARING- FAILURE TO RAISUBMITTED ISS ISSUE IK' PBRSc''N OR SY LETTER PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM' T ... THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRKCTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION .. . PLANNING DEPARTMENT 63 CONTACT 9�- 4171,, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD DPLANNiNG ORGANIZATION (NPO) # 5 . CHAIRPERSON: Craig Hopkins bkm /CPA90- 08•BKM PHONE NUMBER 639- 58,.'13 LEGIBILITY STRIP AVE LOOP 2S.01Df - 04402' e•io••. *deo�'s•e•• AltTLXNis ' PRINTING, I 8140 ' 6;1 NIMBUS BEAVERTON 97005 2510100- 00701 s o e •••ssr,.• •sAce RFD PUBLICATIOLB'INC 6960 SW '6320817RW STREET' TIGARD OR 97223 CRAIG HOPKINS 7430 SW YARNS ST TIGARD 'i QR 90223 ITV OF . TIGARD, OIIEGON wIL 1P M_' O C . ; _ • 1r. �: ! l�'� _ Yi' .,IL Vi CITY OF TIGARD., 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION 5t. c,j f tid TAX MO ANA' TAX LOT NO. 2. S. s/ SITE SIZE J, AC, PROPERTY OWNER /DEED MOLDER* , i , c C-0144 t /4C44._ ADDRESS PHONE " jS s CITY 1(,. 57 a.i t �.,d_, tai ,_c ZIP APPLICANT* ADDRESS PHONE CITY ZIP *When the owner and the applicant are different r People, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee ir, possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with, written authorization. The owner(,) must sign this' application in the pr space provided--'on page trio or submit a written authorization wit this application. 2. The owners record of the sub3 a Com xeheneve Plan Amendment request p (if aPPlicable) from [ F(E, to (ice 51- A ' and a Zone Change from to OR The applicant requests an amendment to the following sections of the Comprehensive Plan ..w .., ,. or Comcciunity Development Code ,.. 013/?.. 1�ev' d 5/81 FOR STAFF USE ONLY ChEE N0. OTTER CASE NO'5 :. RECEIPT NO, 5 "` 3 7c*.' APPLICATION ACCEPTED Bic: DATE: ApplicIWAa elements submitted: (""-(A) pplication form (1) 4..<11) Owners signature /written thorizat .on C) Applicant's statement app check list) D) Filing ,fee (t� Additional information for Compre- sive Plan Map Amendments /Zone Changes Naps indicating property location (pre--app check list) (F) List of property owners and ad eases within 250 feet (1) eeaor' a Map ( 1) Title transfer instrument f +) DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE FINAL , DECISION DEADL NE CO . " PLAN /ZONE DPS IF IGNATIONs N.?.O . Number: Planning Commission Approval Date: w..r•i��rw.��.t City Council Approval Date: PL1CA+T will exercis`+ ;;the ri81t'i If�rc " ths: ?appli"ca'c�on is ,;granted ",; the appLicaat: ._ granted. = =in accordance with the * terms and subject to'all the ; conditions ,:anu li ®it Lions `'.'of the "apprY val. above statements and the stateaente, in the attachments ,. " and exhibits' transn�itt4d herewith, are true p applicants - so ° ackncwledp*e that any,,', p�ermi,t , issued:, biased application, may be ' revoked if it `is any,_' .that any such statements a {ate false The , applicant has read the entire contents of the application,„ includia the policies and criteria, and,r,µ,under,stands the requirement,* for {kipprovin or denying the application. 'DATED this !'`' „►..r day s GNATURES of each owner (eg. huabtid and wife) of the eubSL ct propert r PROPOS L FOR �� COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:AMME August 1990 Project Number 29032 Mackenzi a /Saito & Associates, P. P.C. (LISA) 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street P.Q. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201 -0039 503/224-9570 69). The Plan and corresponding zone..desighations were Ilcl.t.s.:t,!41a,:1,?ik the north 'side' of Sandber.g' Street and Heavy Industrial ',(10,,,,,2) to the outki:.' . During thA7... C.ity-wide review of tile Compreiiensivt) Plan -in 2983;,' the zonin4 on' tfii , , - site changed to CP. In 1985, seiveral' Properties.to the, toot't tilkst Of the isubject , property were rezoned from CP' to IP', to eliminate the ,non-confOrilling StatuS of those PtioPet"ties caused hY the 1983.,ComPrehenSive Plan ame, ndme:,t/S., as to which properties becapm I,P was bated largely i„on the piroperty ownerit, ' , request. Key Bank requeted that all of *its prOPerti(it ret4in 'the CP' ' designation ' � The site abuts _-_--__.'~'_--'_'__ to the __--,-~_- _-~.~_' mix, --~ .~ ~~' industrial builditigs. Across S.,W. Avonue to the, west)). the 'ilecvi Center oroject is toried both IP and I/I, arlid clef/cloned with se, eral "multi tenants'„ industrial buildings: Across S.W.' Sandberg Stitet. to tile' nortit,' the CP-zOtied *r, area is developed with office buildings. Three adjacent rarteli to the south.,'Of Bank, 1;u+... only 011e is developed. Ths site is in A tb4anttion area between the "' predominantly office :,,trea. the north' of S.111 'Sandierg rSt>.eet° 'arid 'the oredominatitly industrial area to the south. ,, . fY. I it i h'e Eofilnuni ty4 ap /.Zoning 4 ;amen p. l7�t'e�tl�7dbaera'• ev i ptoJD � rents . E ode :,pro des crier r- eviewed l;in' the4.f t. ti r ompre�e��..13 e applicable 'Comprehensive Plan tPo ci es a for :aPProv:. OWing sect Plan` Policy satisfied 7 muse �l Neighborhood Planning ;organization #5 an 'surrounding _property wi11 be Q yeti notito of public hearings related to the request end t to their, oppertlun i ty to comment on the proposal.. . . Pl ae Policy x.12.1; ,.sati�sf ed $ i roe the site. de�e or�ment his gone through the .development revi.i; wand building. permit processes, atnd ha basin Shawn to comply: �i th appl aol a .Federal tats, and degi o ►a.�, water quality y' requ.irements,�` including. prepa ` ti'on and implemen`tatioo� of a anon point source pay i ut;i on control ° pl. an i n c�mpl. i aroe ``with the Oregon Envi r:onmental'' , Quality Coy~ i ssi on''s, ru as for 'the,. Tual at i�i River 'Basin. The proposed, redesi,gnation does , eompl i�ance' with this Plan Policy. Ptan Pol l cy 4.3.1 i s implemented through the development rev,i ew, process in which building placement and. landscaping have been. reviewed with tr°e sect to minimizing 'noise impacts of , the developing use ,upon, neighboring land uses. fa11 range o f public services are currently . provided to, the s te:' Plan Policy 8.1.1 is satisfied because the proposed redesigr�at on could actually decrease the site's demaiu on the public roadway system, o of the `�a�ldibgs A traffic comparison arison ma: be made by occupants P applying i trip ene �, foal P Plan Policy 5.1.1 is satisfied because this proposal ' wri1' enhance the economi a diversity ,f the Ti gird ,ar€ia , The subject propert y i 1 ocated within a transit' otti area between predami.nantl y office uses to the north and industrial uses to the south`. The IP 'zone w� 11 al low the existing/approved site ,_ y uses g/ pp. to development to accommodate a variet of consistent with the ►1aiure of the surrounding area. ▪ Plan Policies • 7.1.4, 7.21, 7.4 4, and T. 6.1 are Satisfied be, ause adequate public servi ce capac ti es are avai l abl a to t rve the site, A • depending P may rataon to he _ , een r� upon the actual RPy g R site .data. 9 w • a o • • • • s . . i • i .79, 200 sq., p 82, ac) 2 • • e . u d . i (27,400 sq, ft • , dui l d ng. area • CP Trlp Generation' IP `Trip Generation • s +1 . 8 P A 520 Vehicles per .Day (ITE Code 710) 2111 Vehi cl es per Day (ITE Code 110 It '�1 9M : There are no residenti a1; areas si tea . LOCATED ON AN ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR ` STREET AN THAt INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC SHALL NOT BE CHANNELED THROUGH RESIDENTIAL AREAS." THE SITE SHALL BE OF A `SIZE AID SHAPE WHICH WILL PROVIDE SHORT AND LONG RANGE NEEDS OF THE USE." !; : The site can accr odt : �.�. a � � the exi std rig and pl annex development. TOPOGRAPHY OF DED FOR DEVELOPMENT SHALL . HAVE AN'� AVERAGE' SIT THE : LA��G ��±TEN ' GRADE, ..,THAT IT CAN BE� aE�l4":� S �i�A�E .� LESS THAN 6% . OR THAT THROUGH ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES ,.„L LIMITATIONS V c La1PMEH AND THE PROVISION OF SERVICES CAN Sir, LITIGATED." cOMM E NZ. . The site grades e be en taken into consideration development of such that extensive grading is not .,required 11 - ••■ • I IJ +4.44 . , " ... • „,, • .1; . II' BE ,DEMONSTRATEI) THAT ,ASSOCIATED LIGHT, NOISE, .'OTHER EXTERAL m . ACTIVITIES , EFFECTS IfILL—NOT INTERFERE WI ' USES ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.,n gamglii:, Surrounding properties are developed In ght industrial and office uses, which are consistent with,,tiii tatut.0 of the site. E)ei st ing landscaping and, ,bui building ng sett)ticks ensure that no use . conflicts will octur. ... ,. , nf. ALL OTHER APPLICABLE PLAN POI.IC".AE! CAN BE MET." , COMMENT: No coctfl icts with other, plan pol ides have , been identified. ' StatOiljAeLPIii ; 1. Goal '#1•(Citizen, ,Involyement)', Is satiitteri because the City has adopted a 'HcitiLten involvement program '.'itcluding-' ••reviewof all land use and develOPment, applications by neighbi.:)rl.lood planning ,organitatlont • In addition, ptIbl c, notice recireants related to this application will be' .„ • .1. , 2. Goal 2 (Land'', Use Plattlt,ing) is satisfIc ecat,ise the 'City will apply applicable Statewide Plairining .Goals,' city .of, Tigard Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code 'requiT•semOnts, to the review proposal. ' 3. Goal #9, (Economy, of the State) is satisfied because the pt•opOset1.. relesignation would increase the City's invettry of developable' Light r,,1 Industrial lan on 'a, parcel which it best'Suited.fOr Industrial/IP uses. 4. :Goal , #12 (Transportation) it :satisfied because. ''proposed 'IP designation ' : not ‘'InCr4ase potential' site genef-atqct' 'traffic, aS documented by a tffi comparison n a preceding sectio,:. C. c..4.ct_e_tandArd.s. Section 18,i;3.o10 of the Code provitll'et 'a. statement of purpose for the IP District." ' "1. , For combing light inainufaCturi fig ICS!' ,and complementary-related ated,' . cetitaetti al Oses, rettatitian't, 'barber',, 'beaUty,', salons, and fitness centee. 2. For combinIng uses. which have no offsite ,,impacts in ',terms ei .noi se, (1dOtii, glare, lights, vibration, smoke, dust, or 'Othet types of off-site impacts;" , cjimpigt: The existing and planned development will accommodate a variety of uses that fleet the performance standards. - 4 - • cam: The street and utility . pattern is E stab`s i shed, with -Iccess t a !'collector street y n is to d :�'oi "nip 'Which .utilize an t��na�t circulation ati on� system which con ec .a .� sites ;" Comment,: The subject -site and an adjacent parcel sh rre 'an access p�o'i nt a 8. Which provide a ,com e te se re -im os e estr t1cnsr ( e. 'seed restrictions, . restriction covenants, etc. )t that are eni!:orceabl el upon all occupants Of the industrial park includiing,, provisions. for to ■ improvement, , building design, landscaping,,, sign: - critrol , off - street parking, and site .maintenance: 9. Which provide evidence of continuing management `responsibi ity. enforce restrictions established upon the original . development pl and CIMMInt.:. l'he subject site is under ensure appropriate maintenance. Which recognize the differing ' transportail, i o requirements employees and service vehicles with adequate provision , for pul transit access‘," inflq�aY \'� iiw This site i s ` .1 a transitional area between the * %red mi nar;, y off i anc industrial areasa to the north 'and south, ret►pecti vQ :,y o. The adjacent ►,erti t+ the east and west ,are iOoned IP and re 4 i;'�.. i ch n I, a � sA �� �� al i n cha�°acter `The prop'a�sed • a� ge l to , IP meets the required . criter'i a ,V0.i.'i responds t b thie ' nature �� eT the • e i st 41. � site 'development;, and also ;I s. 'erns st nt roc th the p":bl c i nfrast�ructura in the area. • it., is therefpre' requested that the plan and. �oni►rg on `this site' - changed. to Ligt t Industrial and, IP',; res'pectively cizacr,:viza . , AL 1101 %Y, 1U • • • • 4e • RFD F'tiRTAX.CAta"ZONER,, 6960 ,13,1! eitl41D13tG1'; TI.;ARD OR 9123 ' 'slit 'FIR ST wit's 4201 .N AA a MIITlAl. •" s tilt Mti gSt :%Ne i 3703 gyp.. ,w +OA. C.R. a0 ash yb$'p..... stoat tiff ii. am ee Sh u N AL tiff FOR £ SSESSMEN ; PURPOSES -; ONt.Y, bo HOT RELY ON `FOR ANY OTHER US" ,iaf liesl;k.�af, t +fuN 4 CNI b! ±f "01M,II'K'' 8'1y ?I* CON, ;',.1 JhC$ NICKLIN' 341 MA 1b PUe1.IC 010/141 [11M."T [ No' IV [ _. INITIAL PONT 401 J.1s' 4C -AI 401 -42 t 19604 !' SANDBURG STRUT TOO amai 1000 ,a0 At, b (C.5 N .4fse1 p" • (C4 No Ow) All!k. 1. 4 • son.D . 000a�Y[NT lull.. _ ITI / /I1 s fv N. Litt JAM i1 CKUN GL.C. 43 6UK"1 u SEE MAP 4 -4NT. COO. 1S) 124S ,me,... GIi!kl ra .e P - DATE: 014: Tigard .Planning Dp 0A .1..".1.A. L var4 (NPO #5) A request for ' Coinpr.heneiv o approval. from Commercial Professional"; tO Light Ind:let-rift", Aleo requested is a', EoiNlii.Change fr,* Commercial Profeisional to industrial. ZONE:, (Commeivial, 'Professional) -LOCATION: Southea St ,corner.Of SW 72nd Aven Ue . and SW Sandburg Street (WCT14" «221 1DC, tax lot 3800) Attached is tha Site P1an and applicant's statement'lfor your review. 'From information supplied by various depart:Sante and 'agencies ond from other information availab3.11 to our I staff, a reliart and recocumeridatiol: will be 'Pre Pared and la decision will be rendered on tily.s pr'�a1 Ln the maw future. If you wish to comment on 1 this application, we need your enOisiments by firag3,,,I, 19,91. Yon 'may use the space provided below or .,attach a Hseparate letteir 'to , return your commente. 112924...Attmaggag_t_o_r_tumnd, hv tirkti,,abo_ve p3.esse phone the 'staff contact noted below with yi.our 1 comments 1 and confirm your _ . comments in writing. as goon as possible. If you have any queStions regarding tZLC matter, contact, the Tigard Planning Department, PO 'Box 23397, 13125 SW _, • Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE:''' 639-4171. „ ST g,:0NTZtG4T: JerrvOf etr PLEASE CHECK 11'1113 F0LL0WIN ITEMS TWAT APPLY: StTe have reiriewa4 the proposal and have no objections to L. Name of peee06 Commenting: Phone Number: bkm/cPA90-08 ,Nicm , 2 cOiaiei) ' ' t • ITY OEPART1#07es' Building Ins c)r/Brad-11. Parks _ ity RecOrder '„ Polic < Engineering Gassy A. , Other.' SPECIAL' DISTItICTS Fire j)iiirict ' School Diet° No. (Beavr (pick-up box bldg.) Tigard Water Dilitrict 8777, SW, Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223. JoY !Pahl. • Box 00 ,f1t)averton, OR 97075 • ' W.:hool. District 23J (Tig) 1 13137 SW :Paci.fic Hwy. Metzger Water Dii3trie‘t ' * • SW 'Taylors Ferry Rd.'" ,, ,'• 2441',FItCTED' JURISDICTIONS"- ash. Co. Land Use' & Transp. Boundary COMILeeiOn 150 N. First Ave. 320 SW Stark Zoom 530 H,i..,Llsbcaro, OR 97124 H1.11s)poro, OR 97124 Kevin Martin , Joann Rice Scott King • ' ' Fred rIberlet Mike Borreson Jim Hendr3rx 'City of Beetv4Brton PO Box 4755 Beaverton.' OR 97076' StateHighWay bivieicitt Lee Gundereiori PO Box 565 Beaverton, OR 97075' 2000 SW 1ert4 Ave. Portlan?:1 OR 97201-5398 , • , ;LCD (CPA's only) 3 lopf e5 1175 Court, St. NE ' Salem, OR 97310-0590 • ia • • • • , • • • • • • • a • • 110a, • • la 4 4 4 4 • • • • 4'4 • all • S. SPBCIA:4 General Telephone m Mike Lutz essomiarreino 12460 SW Main St. Be erton, OR 97007 NW Natural Gas Ronald D. Poli, PIS, PLS 220 NW Second Ave. Portland, OR 97209 Other ■ S • • • • 444 • 4'4,4:4 • • ' . U • • Port)-and General Electric Brian, Moore , 14655 SIN pid Scholle Ferry BeaVortori, OR 97007 Metro Etre., Cc}imatzisiciationa Harlan Ccolc Tviin,Oalcs Technology Center 1815 NW 159th Place S-6020 Beaverton, OR 97006-4886 West Pete NetlEtots. . 421. sw Oak St. ' I Portland, OR 97204 OregOnj Mike ' ' 3t3'o0' , SW Bond P�±-Eland, OR 97201 r . access wt,,s not a viable alternative. Cuncil acti Dn: Notion by Cocancilor Ea+ Ion, secoladed by Councilor to deny • t_111,,?, developltent request as presented and to direct sta!rif to prepare the appropriate resolution and documents. . Discussion on the moti_on followed. Consensus was that the criteria a stated dtir:,i,ig Council consideration on ,t)lis item would be the criteria listed as reasons for dsnial of the application. , The moi...torn was approved a tulanilaious vote of Cc3unci2. b. There were no declarations nr c Senior Planner Liden reviewed the staff report as presented to Council in their meeting Packet- d. Public Testimony z. tans Stout from MacKenzie Saitc was available to answer qtieztions. e. sen11.01.' _ Planner Liden aeIrieeti _ staff recommended approval of the proposed ordinance. i-- • P1'llic haring was closed. g. =MI ORDINANCE NO 90-38 - AtT ORDINANCE ADrEOPI3TLANINamliF,Ifirtly:IINEI(Nc7ehilti miA, , : . 4vo. 4. 1 ). .. CONCLUSIONS TO APPIkOVE A comPREHENsII ZONE CHANGE REQULTED BY THE W. L. mccoluacx t-,-,-- , , 0008, ZON 90-0008). ,, , 1t oft 4 atv ;1'he .motion was approve y a unanimous ,. ote of Council present. OF S ,� S�iST�� . �. . EFT �� STS a City Administrator reviewed ca this agenda ite> y . : Voters approved a county -wide traffic impact fee in Septe aber , 1990 with a 72% yes vote, The effective date' of impleentation,is October 22, 1990. . The :policy guestion, before Comi it . was "Shall the Council retain a local: system development charge for streets?", Staff re commerided • that t e Council . direct staff to initiate ordinance preparation, retaining a system development charge for transportation. It was further recommended that the Council. direct staff to administer the proposed rates during the period prior to adoption of the amending concurrent with implementation, ordinance and oz d't of 'TIF. Staff %.ould submit j ustif icatiof for the system development charge (SDC) in accordance with estate statute. b. There was lengthy discussion on thi s agenda Chatles Hales of tl a Eomebuilders Association and Mary Tobias ' of the Tt �dlatin Valley Economic Development ti Corporation noted their concerns with the City of Tigard retaining aining the SDC charges along with the new TIF. t WAS stressed that the City of Tiga a, throughout the ;tevi lw of a County -wide TIF, always retained the right to cha9. qe: ara SDC along with the, ,TI1? , if it was deemed iltsizable by the City. Councilor Johnson co rated on this issue, reitera ing Tigard's position. Motion by Councilor Fadon, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to implement the , County TIF with no local street SDC , ;:6 collected Tigard, however, ' would retain the right to reinstate, local SDC' fees. The motion passed by a 'majority of vote. of Council present 4-1 (Counci.? or Johnson, voted "go.”) 1 STREET RXi GE a Motion by Counc:a for Johnson, ; nded'l by Coundilor 'Eadon to support the staff f re cicommenda on a 1thori, 4 i.ng t iiai :$sty tract wit,c 08;,4`: Consu:i.ting Administrator to sign a, cc��_ _.. i nc i.neers to do the M. ain Str octet Bridge ,.. (over ∎t n� Cr e ) Project. Tni j is to be funded under ao Streets Traffi4,2 Safety Improvement Bond he brad e replacement is to occur in 1991 CITY COUNCXL MEETING !UNLIT OCTOBER 22, 1,9 1 -- pAGE t-+ A 11-", .J 0NC QENDA' CITY UP „TIGARD OREGO... councIL. 'Ar�ENDr . tTLM ,' SUAMMARY• AGENDA Off': 0ctoher 22 1990, ,/SS /AGENDA''' TXX 3.a E : '.Cf` 4trehenal.ve Pi Amendment CPA 90- 0)08 /ZOne Chan ZON 90 -0008 McCormack-Pacific DEPT HEAD OR R CITY ADM IN OK •a A, 1/111 DATE SUSMIT,TAD. October: 10 1990' �j PREVIOUS A TION � ' Pl "ann" `nq . ommiedion ' heat`ina orgy Oc tuber 4' 1990 �'. 'PREPARED rEY: Jerr,frer beet. Planner REQUESTRO SY as saawsaass• -_ms s a 1 : =s=1,== =aass.a srsa= ISSUE Should the' City reduce its leasable c rcial land industrial development on 'a parcel on SW 72nd Avenue? . $1!$t . base o Low or ,'additiona: — asssa• <osw=o0=m= = aassms=m=== "===ftsa=aaq =s=stsassaw===tea: sac=s ... rsaasaes �.- a� �aaass NZORMATMN LSl The proposal seeks to redesignate 1.8' acres Pram - L ''' /74'Lan designation of Professional Commercial and ,of C f •- '''/7P/ an IP ,r tc�' -the Light ��..�kyet...ial Plan designation. and I -P,' (Industrial Park) zoning. . The parcel contains en approximately 14,000 square foot office an flex opace building' to be ¢, ccup red by the applicant. In addition, a 14;000 square foot flex -space building' is al!Eo being constructed on the parcel. The applicant, whose use is a permitted use in either the exiat n9 or requested zoning. districts, requests the redeeignationo in order 'to,increoese the to po ntial arllowable , tenants in thy, . leasable portions of the site.. The. app;iicant also states' that redei ignation would be:'', consistent with the predominantly industrial character of adjacent parcels. The parcel` is located at the southeastern corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Sandburg Street. The Planning Division issued a staff report • to the Planning Coaamisaion recommending approval of the application. i10 negati4e responses were received with" regard to the proposed rsdesignation froze reviewing agencies. No adverse i apacts upon adjacent streets or upon n!3i hborin parcels a foreseen if the parcel i® redesignated. All a pp licable P tat and zone change criteria are satisfied. The Planning Commission reviewed. the proposal at tt a aiseioW e ' Ootobe' 4, °ea meeting. The Planning Co!u =slon also recom mends; rt rOva1 of , :h e requested L ight Industrial f an designation aP zoning designation. D� of t Ninut ®e of the Commission's discussion and an ordinance' incorporating the findings (f the Planning Division staff report are attached. ce== = a =saxassssacrssimmesme rsan aeararassssssaassti.esmmssasssaa mesas "' amvsima�>,taa>�asssss: ALTERNATIVES �sa�asssaewmasaa CONSYIIUM • Approve the requested . '•fight Induatria] Plan 4414 adopt the Latta toed;, • Approve th. p ; 0 •cacti staff Aso prepare 'an ordinna to e cR;,eeted . de ®,f nc�t�.`one, and �. reflecting ;comments and concern® tasae% A* t'ne CouncT].1 hearing ae • tr=oll 'ae th,s • CounCJ ' e readoning fz4 approving ti* I • zoning danignationa and sat— ssasassaecaeac sPtaidetio : end ditecct of f t® Ire 3LUre a !COjreSPO)idinl� 3 • peel, the , a • saaaraarasassa= asa�ate> Qasasasuu� >eaeass��statesaessataeasiegei �^ ,. FISCAL IMPit azssissr�A�sisassaQSZSS: eissesaaaaasssrrt >asazssa�assaaaa�s /c ; _, ssaaaws: aa> reaesartsaea�rssssas 'as:itd�saofa�samt assraastisYSa asacatSS�,YS� SUGGESTS ION Approve the recipes +n afloat ithe attached ordinance. '.,. '..'°'•..A .c.,. NG ;FINDINGS' AND` CoNCLUSIO CHANGE REQUESTED BY Tip as .requested a.: Corn to Light '.Industrial and! WHEREAS, the Planning , staff made recor ndation of T :c and .Manning co mieeion rat m public 'h(aaring' onI „Octo the Tigard City . Council, held .:;a ober 22', 1990 to :.leviaw,, Planning e recommendations as well as public; testimony. SECTION 1: The prt•p: �►al ;pis conbtstont with all relevant cri c=eria based the faits, f'Aid3,ngs, and conclusions noted below: Coloprehoneive' Plan Amendment CPS 90 -0008 Zone Change EON 90-0008. REQUEST: 1 Plan map autendment..fro Commiarc i ai Professions. Tadttrial. Zone cy►rhge from C-4P (Profesainnal, 'Goa rc a to I -,P ` (EncluStrial Park) '.son Eni dietric�t ' APPLIC. NT: W . L- Occormac'* 7415 Fair Fairlog4 ,1130p Wilaonrillb, CR 9707( AGENT: LOCATIG ... Na Southeast cower ,of .SW ?2n. Avenue PROPERTY DESCRIPizioN: WCTIU 281 IrDC BackorourdInformation The plain for NPO #5 was ado 0 The plan and cr -reapaorid$,ng wear gl designs the :; subject ate er . Tn 'uihttrial ; Park; ; is w .Sandburg Strreet, and Heavy anduntrial (I -2) ; on the south side. , Both of. these ;`zoning diztricts allowed for both commercial office and industrial 'JUGS During the city -wide ,review of the, Comprehenoive Plan in 1983, the zoning for the 'subject prop'arty, along with several other Parcel= . l'eceiv ing access from Sandburg Street, was changed, to C -P' (cOagercial Professional) • Along with the change in map designation, the list of permitter uses' in the C -P 'zone was reduced. ''The C-P zone dove ntot allow industrial ,, uses that were previously ; all Awed in ' the forcer M-2 zone. In September, '1985,' "trhe ." 'City council 'reviewed a proposed plan Map redeaignation of 21 to c 14ts , that rece; we accede to Sandberg Street' from Comore, vial-Pr.ofeeai.onal to Light Industrial, and a zone change. from C=-P, to I-F• The Council ' a apnoved the r s,deaignatio n for onl y 7 of the parcels, not Including the sub ect Property (CP A 5 -85 On July 3, 1990, the Director's designee' ap)rovad a request by the current applicant for Site ' Development Review Approval to redevelop the existing 14,432 square foot of building on this site for administrative officss for a construction engineering and management . first and to allow, construction of an approximately 13,000 square foot Parcel ( 90-0012). Redevelopme t building site mast twith him appli ati n 2is Pa 4 ��� accordance ,PP � i currently under 'way. No other land use or development applications involving the subject Parcel have been reviewed by the City of Tigard- . vicinity Inforniat±on pe north and south a:e Properties to the ^� also zoned C-P rb►:3 contain a variety of `office uses. Properties to the east are zoned I -P and include a variety of inaua" trial uses. The ad j acont parcel to the ea contains the Gould Pump Comp an y . Across SW 72nd Avenue from the subject site is a vacant parcel' that is zoned'I -P which is a part of tt'e Tech Center industrial Park. Properties to the northwest are zoned' C -P and resent contain e p y Ingle- family residences or are vacant. SW :72nd Avenue abutting the site is a 44 -foot wide 'paved major �+,��. rm drainage. A sidewalk does not exist on either side of the street ector street that includes curbs and etc t. Shy Sandburg Street- abuttim the site to a fully improved local street with sidewalk i on both sides. Site Information and Proposal Description The 1.8 acre parcel presently contains the 3.4, 432 square feat A combination office /storage building. AL. Parking lot containing approximately 60 parking spaces in located on the north side of the Parcel. lone access driveway connects the parking Ict., with SW, Saundbg Street. Ttn site contains large tUre , an dse. mpinq including several large trees along 12*d �venu�.frontaq a the of site and several oak treat along Sandburg street. ORDINANCE NO. 9( Page 2 A. 4.; • The applicant is in the process 'of remodelling, the ex sting buiading into an office building for a, construction management and engineering„ firm. Apprcnimately 4,000 aware' feet ,of';tu a ;.existing, storage:; area is, to be . modified ` for leasing to "another, use. The applicant also has begun construction of a:' new 14,000 ;square` foot single story flex apace building on the :Mat side of, the parcel. The project includes expansion of the existing parking area to cvtrround the existing building adding 25 additional spaces". " TwC` " new, driveways from Street 1:o the parking lot will be provided along ,with` closure of o the exirsting drivewa r " Also to be constructed is a ,dew, driveway and truck maneuvering area on the far. eastern . edge ` of the Bite to serve a number rif overhead doors On the new flex -space 'bui ding as well as the office 1 puilding to the south. This applicant requests a Plan Hap Amendment from C'ommorcial Prc ,faasional to Light Industrial and a Zone Change from thia C-P' (Commercial. Professional) zoning district to the I-P (Industrial Park) zoning district for the 1.8 acre parcel. The applicant has submitted a titled Prouoaal for a , prehenr iye nt and Zone Chancre - W L:? McCormack and Cfasnpany. The primary intent of the request is to broaden the number of possible uses allowed in the development. Agave and NPO..Commentd The Engineering g.' Division has reviewed, the proposal and offers the � Division comuent a: a. The site is already developed • bu ldin g with p eyed P arkin g and ,The, r ested razOnin g will not require ;any • additional public facilities. b As described rp ' 0 substantially lase', gibed in the a 1 %cant a submittal, su v&hiclea per day world be expected from potential uses in • the P Po P. ro sed zone as com aced traffic ffic generation anticipated from uses permitted under the existing coning. Furthermore, substantially lead traffic during peak periods is typicali.j�` associated With moat i ��uatr ial uses compared to typical office uses. The Engineering Department hcle no objection to the proposed rezoning. The 'Building Division, Tualatin. Valley Fire and Reidcue District, Tigard Water District,, General Telephone, and.PGE have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. No Jother coaente have been received. FINDINGS' MID CONCLUSIONS Trict,t al/lack-11d criteria in this case are State;ieide and 12; C! 7±uxehenai a Plan Polidisto 2.1.1, 4.. ORDINANCE NO. 9 page 3 .arming Bale, 1, 2 .I.. n.: s ...::a M1 7.2.1',, 71;14.4, 7.6.1, 81.1, 8.1.3, 12.2.1', 12.3..1 (locational criteria, for the Light Industrial plan ,,designation),; , and ,;the ,change or mistake quasi -" judicial plan map amendment ,critrhria of both the Comprehensive Plan and Community fiaevelopment i ,Code. In addit on, the proposed redebignation ahould be consistent with the purpose taection for the requested I -P d zoning d,ietricte. in G Stat. wide Plann Dale The Planning division concludes that the., proposal‘ is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals based upon the following finding : Goal #1 (Citizen :Xnvolvemvant) is 'satisfied because the City has adopted a citizen involvement 'program including,, review of all land use ' and developnent applications by Neighborhood 'Planning Organizations (NPOS) . NPO #5 has rbeen informed of the applicatLon and 'has been provided with the opportunity to comment • on the prraponbal,1►, In additions all public notice r e vireaantb related to this application have been satisfied. ▪ Goal . Goal #2 (Land Use Planning) , is satisfied because the City has applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies, and Community Development Code requirements +.o the review of this proposal. • Goal #9 (Economy of the State) is satisfied' because the proposed re.deeignati.,on would increase the City'a inventory of developable parcel industrial use,, industrial land on a eed concerns well suited limited The City has recently expreesed ited ' amount of developable and /or leasable 'industrial lands in the, City's review of a prapoeed plain amendment /zone change for Spieker Partners further south on SW 72nd Avenue at SW Lower Soonea Ferry road (CPA <:90- 0004). The City Council approved that application redeeignating 6.6 acres from zoning ;< designations although the p industrial to commercial plan and r Council indicated a desire to maintain , a �ru£ficient developable p industrial land base. The present vroposal would; partially replace th e industrial land lost through the S7tbi Aker xedeaigration. Goal #12 (Transportation) IA aatiefied because the proposed I -Yy • designation is not anticipated to result in an increase in Site enerated traff c, as deec_ i_ bed further under Policy 8.1.1, which follows. Plan Policies Staff has determined that the change ie ' p po Map Amendment/Zone g )ae ro eed -.Plan I�Ia � �n p ive Plan based upon the findings 1 c�.:�eie�tent with the Com rehene 1. Plan Policy 2.1.1 Ls satisfied because Neighborhood Planning organization #5 and surrounding property owners were given notice of tS�t° public hearing related I n addition related to the requ+eet. * notice of trio g �, laic hearing g published g was ainnounced on a. P -Sarin was b.�eh®d ire the Tigard Tares: and sign placed on the site. _ ORDINANCE NO. Page 4 er Plax Policy is satisfied since the site ° s improvements hate been reviewed' through the f.%ity a development review and building; Per t processes and have been shown to comply with applicable .federal, state,` and regional ,Water, quality' requiremente,., including ,preparation and i.mr1emehyat ,gn Of control plan and compliance with the pregot Environmental, Quality .ComrOies „en's , rules'for. the Tualatin. River Bain. The proposed redea;ignat On,:with resulting changes in the use ®which might occupy the ,situ, woulld not. affect: compliance with this Plan iPol ey'. • Plan Policy implemented the • developeent review p rocoee, ixi which building placement 8nd L ndscaninc have been' rev.icwed with respect to .minimizing noise irmpacte of use of the . site u;;oon adjacent' land ueee. " No significant noise impacts would b expo cted 'due to light industrial. use of the property an compared to' cost erci,el `use' permitted under'' the existing zoning:,; They parcel does not abut ' typical ; noise sensitive Sees' such ae residences, schools, day care faCi1it en, or retirement homes. • Plan Policy 5.1.1 Le satisfied because this' proposal would ''enhance ';the economic .lan esceity of the Tigard area., :'The subject ''property is located within a tra ��iv � , predominantly office user; to the north and .industrial uses tap the south,. The ne:►.ton area between predocni P zone ' will allots the existing approved etke developments to accommodate a variety i see more consistent with the nature of the surrounding ar ea than would be allowed under the C -P zone. • Plan Policy 7.1. , 7.2.1, 7.4.4, and 7.6.1 are satisfied beDau3e a full range of public service are currently provided ovided to this ei1e. service providing ing review agencies have not raised an iesuee regarding ,Y y p g ability to provide service to thin eitc� if the Plan. and zoning denignations are changed. . Plan Policy. 8.1.1 is ©atiefied because the proposed redesignatioh could decrease the demand on the public roa%way system generated by ueee on the ro ng rt , depending upon the occupants of the bu g l ae assessed utilizing the Institute of Traffic 1n g ineere Tri p Generation,:Mnuual. The applicants have provided the following basic traffic analysis, comparing projected trip generation using the site data and basic trip generation projections: site area a....... ...a 79200 equate feet (1.'82 building area .......... 27,400,'aquar9 feat C -P °trip generation .... ..... 520 vehicles per day (ITE I -P trip generation ......... 241 vebiclee per day (ITS acre Code 710) Code! 110) The above analysis indicates that the Plan /aOne change :revueeted -would ,not! L a expected to eignifi antl.y affect the . transportation system and coup; even result in a decrease in the potential . vehicles trips generated by industrial ueie Of the property under the a,regUeeted deeignatione as Compared to typical i cammercia1 uses- allowed by the current deaignatione ORDINANCE NO. 9 - Page S xV: ' d 1 4 . 1=� Plan Policy 8.1.3 ie satisfied since all necessary pulic:' street <':, improvements are in place and have been assessed for sufficiency o for serving the existimg and proposed site developments through the. Site Development Review and ,Building Permit proesssee. Plan Policy 12.2.1 provides '.locational criteria for commercial klan'" designations'. The Connneroial- Professional Plan designation criteria cote that Site quit .ty, infraddtructure, and adjacent land. useb,' indf abil are the key elements in locating ,Connercial- Profea®ibnal areas. High visibility is a site characteristic which is not a quality,exhibited o by, the subject site. Of pauti 'filar note is the site's location, existing development, and . surrounding uses which are not definitive u ;'' Commercial-Professional in nature., The property, therefore might not 'bse :properly 'designated' with the existing Commercial- Professional Plan designation Plan Policy 12.3.1.b provides locational criteria 'for Light Industrial Plan designations. W� he'C -° (q ond rehensive addr�ee ®� ®aneBRmendcnen and Zone Cha ge - I .. �.,.� _Y criteria on page 3. The City Council ' generally concurs with this analyoie and borrows liberaL'1y from the applicant Hin providing the following find1ngs. The locational criteria are noted in capital letters: SIMMS FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE: 1. BUFFERED FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO ASSURE THAT PRIVACY AND THE RESIDENTIAL CHARAOTER,OF THE AREA IS PRESEIWED. COMMENT: The only reeyaontial develoP milt nt in the vicinit y of this 4 The proposed' site is to the northwest aoroee ,S►� 72nd.: Avenue. redesignatiOn , and industrial use of this site would not be anticipated to impact this ree 4,dential area due to the eeparation of these areas that is provided by SW `I2nd Avenue and because the buildings on the subject p crerty and traffic areas are set . back some distance from the streets. • LOCATED ON AN I3RTERIAL COLLECTOR STREET AND THAT �� '� CHANNELED RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC SHALL R�100��. �r� CiiANNE�ED THROUGH,. AREAS . " crelre to SW 72nd A e, a major collector COMMENT: The site has Avenue, street, via SW Sandbur a � nu g S`� streets channel. Street. Neither Of ..h®ee traffic through reeidenti61 areas. SHALL. BE OF A SIZE At D � SHAPE ; .. l A SITE WHICH tLL PRC�.$ FnA SHORT AND LONG * RANGE NI;ADS OF THE USE." :3T: The site can SpOOMa date the existing onus e potential future indstrial uses within the conf irxe�e bu ldLnge. ',,4ize ®. ORDINANCE NO. 90-..�: Page 6 1 a!s, the 1 ., ;II.' LAND UNTENDED FOR DEVELOPPI!ENT S�',AiLL NAVE, AN AVERAGE' SITE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF LESS THAN 6 PERCENT GRADE OR THAT IT CAN BE RING TECHNIQUES ALL LIMITATIONS` DEMONSTRATED ` THAT THROUGH SNGINE'�. TO DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROVit3ION OF SERVICB3 CAN BE MITIGATED." ' have been taken into consideration '. n _ The � site's grades C�IMMENT the site development plans ouch that , extensive grading wan . no requiz gad for the current conatruction on the ..property. The site grading plans have previously been approved by the City of Tigard Building DiriIrion. IT, CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT ASSOCIATED LIGHTS, NOISE, AND OTHER EXTERNAL AFFECTS WILL NOT "INTERFERE WITH THE ACTIVITIES AND USES ON SUPRO LADING PROPERTIES. COMMIT: Surrounding properties are developed with office and industrial utrea which are largely consistent with the types ' of uses that would be permitted on the subject property under the re ented, Light Industrial' Plan and I -P zoning' designations. Existing 1ander:aping and building' setbacks should reduce the potential for light and noise impacts and other potential conflicts with adjacent uses. I -P . �onnq D�.atrict The ee statement for the I -P zoning district etatee that the zone ie Pub intender s N ... for combining light imanufactUring, Office and CompliMe�ntary related ccttoercal uses a . • . for coabinin g uses whi .h h ave no off aaite impaatts in terms odor, glare, lights, vibrations earoke �Ac, s of off -e.ite impeCte ... for combining parking, or oths� :. P �' Y Y p•: g and , � nd vinuaaa.l laid la►rYdecas in and Other e d ws hin e�oneAedeveloganent call • ;which prop iL uctures and ue ize a basic etroet and utility pant_::.* residential use .... which u � 1 inr�uetrial sites .... which will rmit flexibil t in the size pf which provide for a circuldtion, eyntem that rovid ��cese to . not channel t e f a, °'through 14 or collectors that, will _ residential areas .. which utilizes an interns+? c,L '" Y arterial � rccrrlat.ion a stem vide th. lets ne of which dOnnecte to nOje=ining'eiteeu .. which pro pre imps. r g upon trict3,one, xe - �aed reetri.tio.ae (e. . , �•eed roe covenants, etc.. that ante enforceable a�.l occupants of the } • inrruatrial park iscludn provie ioPL site Lm ro omens, building • design, landecapiA4 , sign control, of €-- strut p�ark3.ng,' and . s,lter .... idence of con'ainuiaag' manage snt� + hich provide ev mai:nFenaxcco .... ev g, .. y nforcO restrictions eetabl shed upon the original de ®elop nt dams and which r. ognize th iffering transportation P re . ire�ente of the employees and service Hvehicles. with adequate p . rov P i ®ion fOr public tranrilit' across dressed this pu woes statement ____moo The applicant Snag ad 1;140., Comps . � tate�enth included with, danent and lion ® � ��Qe a .. ,: ', .. _ �ehensive Plan hznen� s� P PP cant o� t1�e n licaton. T her Council concure �,ith t�+�i° a 1i •e aeeeesmentt II ORDINANCE NO. Page 7 •1,e W consistency between the roposed rcdeeignation and the purpose statement. Existing and planned site imprc,,,'emente should be able to accommLda«be <. a variety of industrial and office uses that will be consistent with the use And perforrprance standards applicable to the zone. TP,ie eetire site !ie planned to be operated as a single unit in a manner coneiutent with adjacent gre rtie site and surrounding area is nonreeideiat al iil`n character. pe � ®. The e The street and utility pattern is eetabished. The site has access to a collector street that will direct traffic to other c i1'ector and aerial streets without routing traffic through residential neighborhoods. The anbject site and an adjacent Parcel, the Key Bank parcel to the south, share an access drive on SW Sandburg Street. The subject site is under a;single ownership which should ensure appropriate maintenance of the entire site and its buildings. Finally; Tri -Mot route 38 provides bus service to this site on SW 72nd Avenue. Change or Mistake In order to approve a quasi- judicial amendment to the Plan and zoning maps, y f�nd evidence of 'a change in the asighborhood'or tLhe Gtt must also communi) iy which affects the Parcel. Aternativel Y , the City �t fin. that there was mista}se o r inconsistency with regard to the ceegnatiidi the parcel (Camprehensive Plan, Volume II, Policy 1.1.1, implementations Strategy Two; Community Devzlopment Code, Section 18.22.040.a) As noted under backgrounet informatiOn , earlier in this report,, the area within which the site ie located was studied by the City i.n 1985 and the area was partially rezoned to t -P in raeponee to concerns that most of the actual land uses were not consistent with the C -P zoning in effect at that g building r ueS:rial this � p Although the buildin on th -d Parcel has srmnewhat of an n ' se ,�.aa, the I -'� zone; hOfficer c� ,4. acter, the use of the property at tht t time Brae redominanti. t use that would not havr, been a permifi ted u one', Chence the Y� property's rred to ,retain the C -P zoning. zoning ofthie rae�w�ell�as�a few other ro rtiv��s in the area, was retained p parcel, q' � r o f. those a non - conforming uses. in .girder to avoid ma'six,.;� the uses o t.��.�ee prs�pertie The recent sale of t and the curren�� corner has he eubj��ct property to t p p accurately plan zone they property with reci iitated a desire to more. regarc. to t148 character of the Site impro'u'�!ne�te and the surrounding area. imilar, rtequeets for 'the - p in It ie '.likely, that we nria�ry seer other C P Propertied this transitional area as tenants turn o4tur tea more induat ria]. ueelo ThiA hietory of events indicates that the City previously perceived a u ietake in the original plan /zone deeigreatLeee in this area and if the ro rt owner at that time had this site likely wtiuld have ^been' P pe Y desired.+ th ed to I -P in 1985. This condition :anti me to the` a a that 9 retched ..... abutted b similar develop eacet w..��'�n , a Inui�.�7,`��e, of i'iustria1 charac ,er �' o �� already zoned ` I -P. Therefore, it. is clear that a mieteke was madly in i s r I -P ie a more app oppriate designation t ` reflectltheetransitional that the nature +�f the area )between the Office ue north and- lnduetr SECTION 2. The; Cit G .. Y Obion anei staff d'a:rovee the re est to redesignate` the COMM i ouncil concurs with the Planning recQma►andat�.one an PP '� � x.... . . � cel � ill �etrated . ORDXNANCE NO. 90- Page 8 y�r rer or)Q 41) cc 25v. J 799'.; EA: 380 k r 4602 / N �� z e N 249 Ac. o �N .4 .4,og It 0 ". o N •9'24' N 310 C.. 1> �. > 67,277)447Z7,4,- ��1 1' 5., /!i /IJJ(U�Y /r101 //1/ 77_N_1881.24119/ / / /I i +/ //%iii 17RgiltItneP PLAQ ellaN To AT I13A1tS rRsA , i PA rC O44§10 rte r p ° • I lin ' X i \ F,' ., ,,, .„. \ 3900 .' '� ; M to I- f t w in J'SALEM fii II CATS �� � 'fie �YA U.. j% �� o { 04'3:27.16.... rai ... _ 41.QN! 222.p0 ; ,5, w 1, AI« 33' E' , �%� k. — A ,. ' ,,,,: 1. ri,..,,r• • • .,..r.::.•,1. • . 1,t ,x,,tl srRIP !p\ 4 1 00 L1 , •1.. , ..3111:1'1 i ,.Q ���, �� • n 623. i1a ''":: :00;14: sTONE - Ea c,__ SE= coR '" y w.W, .CAMiMAM ftL.C.39' �. � ,� 'tae ��'-.� 4.T0Ae: , . e� C ,, .0.---- -�. i 7 i He said 'there were three main reasc,ns for asking' for a: $3,580,2(60 tax base at this time:' 1) it is fi ,scdl l y sound to plan for the City arid develop a stable source of financing over a multi-Year Period; 2) it is important .to 'avoid dePleition of the fund balance and the problems associated with 'that; and 3) the City needs the increase; in order to maintain' current services in the face of increased demand for the services. He Pointed to the growth in population, which does not increase the tax,; base, and the 15% to 20% i nf� ati on which increases the costs of maintaining ntai ni ng the services. He discussed the language describing the tax base measure a it s� i l l appear on the ballot; and community Relations Coordinator Rewton passed out copies of the ballot 'item. Finance Director, Wayne Lowry discussed Ballot Measure' 5, which is a v:2;onstitutional Amendment to phase in property tax limits of $15/$1 ,000 over a 5 year period and to limit certain fees and charges related to ownerhsip is or property. He advised there s no plan as to how to implement the tax 1 imi tats i and there are many unanswered questions at ". explained two categories: School Category and s point. He ex 1 a� nod t��ewe are t g ry He discussed ho Non School Category. w different fees and charges currently paid by property owners would affect the amount of revenue the City receives. He pirinted out the m 1ny administrative s trati ve di ffi cul ti es of this type of system, as well as the unfavorable impact on Bancroft bonds and LIDs. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDNEG"Y CPA 90-0008 ZONE CHANGE ZON 90-0008 W.L. McCOPMACK (NPO #5) A request for Comprehensive Plan' ` Amendment approval from Commercial Professional to Light .Industrial and a Zone Change from Commercial Professional to ladustrial Park. LOCATION Southeast corner of SW 72nd ,Avenue and SW Sandburg Street (WC h`M 2s1 1 DC, tax lot 3800) Assistant Planner Jerry Offer described site and erpi a ned that the one existing building n wi will be remodeled and will be occupied ed b y the Ppl i cant, W. L. McCrmaCome he site. new 14,C00 squa► foot applicant, _ a a constructed He, rev � awed th��' background of will be . the subject ._: property, wh ich has been zoned C -P ( ommercloA professional) since 1 j 83. He discussed tke business activities which 3tale P l anned bY the a p can:, determ'i ni n g that the company professional and ad mi ni strati ve company providing management services for construction projects; a ,'c equipment on tree site. He said �i11 not be storm �.onste� tioN, Plan allowed on the site including the lan and Zona change e. requested construction-related businesses hwhich are complementary to appl ican G s business. one ss. P1 ani��er f pointed 'out that thereuss� Ong the �rficini ty .information, Assistant p are a ►,.. i x of building types in the ar car some zoned C -P and I-P. recommending 1 l that the impact � ., ... � received � from NP ®,�S',� nner stated that comment wa mpac t o n tt t, Compreh nsi Ve Plan should be considered when changes are made; and NPO stressed the importance' of n ...g behind a given designat,'on, changes being understanding the reason behi with 'cha carefully considered. PLANNING COMwIISSION' MINUTES - OCTOBEa 2,, i 9O PAGE . � 0 IJ .. , . He advited, theio . ' ' 0i.,eO.L',dittiii.itiii0”Ti;:,,„;.,11,.:,,,,,. "all policies ., „ Iih::::_iil_iol'itsi1;Iiii:vil;,leiri.inie:mt,itsf7;-.4:,i,:i'i!et.,.ft4.,;'1-ie:i C-P and I t ' d.teh!,irkgerij at.i oili ,,,,,,b rtioasnaid staff „ nee: in . to: 6,.... ij4-,i,,t,,,,,.... -:PrPri'lliti:/a ;'' '.for between a'recomm!nda.,,i..,,cit,,I,,,couniii;,,,I,i,)1._ itoP,11:g7:!47t:mdMI?:Y Ill'e''"17"1'66''''' zoned C-0.,.., 'aP1),r9v...al'-'Oie the ,, isslon',,t6-Serid dould ,, • There wii,s.0„;,,,i;etisn.tonce...,,,rn,ing,:itie Ke;,..,,Bar1,,si,e,,w '14..req.,kle.st,.',',','-'':',' ,',,',::,: J‘P?LICNT'S PRiSEPITATION. i . ' , ':' : ,.,' .1 . I , ■ , ' , ,, Laris Stot, tkicenzielSai to, spoke en behalf of the ,applieitit, if,JL:',,,'-,,,L.. ii • ' McCertnacIK,and,Conipaity.1. He discussed the, background of 'the site,y,,A;qh1c.. • was previously owned by: Key Bank., 'He said ills firm resea"ched th k: :market ev.ea to determine the best use 1:'or'' the site. Their t-eteart:1,,i,1 detertiined that the I-P: zone designat.iot!i' igrold. be -appropriate based,on the existing 1)uill,dihg style, and change, in charaCtert,-of the area tiroUght: about by new uses in 'the ',area.' - ' : , : : -, . • , , , : . • 1: , ,,,' . , ,L, ' ,' PUBLIC HEARIPIG'CL.OSED : r ' , _ o Contiiissieher. Peterson stated he had no Objectiotj to the request„ :base., on the at, 'glailent ttot:t; an error was 'illd! In zoning. ,' o Colt;lission,er Boone agreed thpt there should''net be a 'problem with the recluested Il/1",,e change. He cestirleteci:, that it, seemed tioutual ' to ,have the,,,', , , . ., . . . zone change requested after the building on 'the site was under . • coristrtuction. ,H • ,,, , . • Coiiiii4,1s sit;iner CaSti 1,E,t advised that his company -has'wOr.ke(ll'iOr ilideotiiiatok Pacific i:h the patt;'' but he did net belieVe,this l'rtetili! influence his ' , '_ • , , ,, , . ., , decision in the ircia,tter. He opi nted, out there, is , a shertage',in 'I-I) . : • property' in 'Tigard, 'Taking 'It dif,fic;tilt for ,Certain busiriettes, to 'Iodate in ' t.tie Ci tY ' He said he Wit5 1" fa4:13r of reol:TkiaH en 6111g, 411-01.6, Val, ot''=;N!,,',L, o : . Commi SSi otter Fessl er agreed With the Other, Coatnisiioneirs;,1',I•atid..she'sal,d . ., the look of the rest of the area tends' to be,,more ilidtittria1,;',and he felt tiiere I was a' mistake in the 'original '41;:ottp plan. She dil:i.,.Tiot 'have " • ' • 616Y °I)j 11'.° tit)ii S to this zoad changeHretluest.'' ', • • - , • , .,. :, , , , . , , , . , .„ , the 0 Ptiesitlent Neon expressed some concern about- creating t'Cr-P,' itlatid .of t-, : Property still owned, by Key B4-fAtt but he -rta .1‘ he agt'eed with ,ioie previlot,i t;ommi,ssit)ners''regardig the transitional and,.miXed hi.ktureof, the area, tiartitul ael y since there are botie§.2rirg',-.1:11‘P,P'et'tieS *)Ofdd I-1), 'He pointed out that.past'Laction-,s have taken ;4:or9perifcyttno .hatiOed, it to C-P ; so he favored adding ,More !-P proPersi, to Ttgardit: inte1;6i7y,..,,, He said apprciVitig' this ir'equettfitotild result iii, the appl ictifit ,having,'!ItOre,- flexibility, .c.i.s 1,1eli as ProVi di ill a site for future bUtilileSS: location - , , . . , , : PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - OCTOSER 2# 1990 tern was , postpO HER hUSI ES ere of ier° bus ; nes PROPOSAL. ONPR NEP SIVE PLM! ANE A iD :ZONE CHANGE N.L. McCORMA'I' & C l IsARD, OR GO August 1990 Project pct N umber 2903 re ar p A e cc Ma.::kenz7 '(Ir' /Saito &Asap � �: • d. ter:, 4690 S.W. 9ancroft Street P.Q. Box €9039 INTRO©UCT!ON` ANP BACKVROUN ' This ,3 s a' praposa'>'. t` change Gompreherisi ;e:.:_:-.,,,., rom: Camnerci el Professional to e_ on;t. ,n zonin from •r' "CP" to purpose Hof . the ;charge 's zo aestaa ►� i sn� a range a r J potential `l and: uses for the s i to " that more cpns i stent !with "trie ' e C,i sti ng "'shi t Via. -�I development and ' the r surrou rdi n9 area.' aI r 4 y, t ': R 1 ` dx •i "i + ', i'� i f ,+ ,_,^. t : ' y{ , The site wasu Ipart, `cf , the Campus. existing building, former! housed the bank tcoarputer o erat ©ns 'and Consequently is a C:omblr~ation'of off;ic L ad ,industri°al design. The` �.ank':s' operation pu 1d ng approxim tel,y I 000 sq. office space and '.4 pproximate, "''n '? i ch housed the cony us era `u i ment'. i„.1,:,'. aM+ Nccormack r � cqui red the wareho00: , wh, P q p proPerty in i dul y 1990 and ': i s. i i n the process of re,rt wait ling the ' bui 1 °� ng to ,.. Cormach �`� �`Com an which i s a . , . � � , s � ' v �` i es�ses ;M�� , n b9 . , , bu�� mess,, Wr L p construct Berl ana Bement fin S Ech bus '11A' and P aiccoi�iwdate • g n are ed i. th ,the CP zones V An tddi ti o 1`d a1;_bui i,ng,, ? d t e reaed paarking, i a 4,100' tl armead n f or I P t'he vsacant e p ai r tt l l th4 $:i' te The bu i ld a^ design , pan ccommodate the . use, t be anticipated thath most Coeiipatii a tenantwill be i it,:': he' P catzgori es, ba; soed on the nature 'of the ar04 -ad the .,surrouding civities, j f . s':{ • M � i4 T'e Pl are for iNPO # was' adopted by the bits Counci l ';on .August 22, ;177, ' 9) . The Plan and corresponding' zone -4es1gnati'ons, were Industrial Park , °(M-4) on the north.'side` of 5anrn ?iberg <'Street .and 1,Ne;a�+y .Industrial ` +(M -2) for the south. Both of these zoning districts allowed ' cwii►1er^ci al office ands' "radustri al uses. `view of the Co orehen s i ve 'Plan r i n 198_, the 'zoni nc_4 on t ,, During the v'I ty -.r�� a�� re n site changed to CP. In 1985, several p'r�,perties to the northwest f,!the °sul sect property were rezo►'e'd from CP to; IP to eliminate. the' non - conforms g status 'of , those. c~Jused by the :1983, Compr'ehosI ve Plan ' ' amendments. The deci si on as to which properti tas�. )ecame IP, was ,ased largely on the . propei ty owner° s request. Key Bank requested that aft , of its proper i es retain - the CP designation. The site abuts I P -zoned proper;, es to the east, level Piped ,with r�i x of industrial buildings: Across S. 72nd' Avenue to, the west, the "Tech Center" project °$ xon� =.d a'both` AIP "and H, and s .developed With several ' "multi- tenant" 1 bu , l di ng3 . Across ' S 1 Sandberg street to north, the C ' , z. ` n i n a. d San TS-vee r ad acenathe cel t t Eye southKey area ri a du� Is de:tel '�apeld w °6 th of fa ce hu i 1a, g � , p��r ere �, Key ins Al' l 'of the the site al on S. ` . � . � . �. r �` � � trans i f an�� �wned by. Key but; onl. _ one i s devel o ed.. This site i s i a 1rea " 4e ween ;the Bank 9 W� _ 72�d Avenue re zoned P se � . . y P. . predominantly office area► to the north of S:L a Sandberg ��theettT and the predominantly v i nC,ustri al' area to the south. �; 11140002,1,104".404 4 CO r. PPROVA TERI he ;Copro uflTty Development Code - provides criteria for approve Iap /Z`on i ng amendments, Each , i s reviewed n the following se't',i om renenis i ye►�an Pol 'he :`appl' i cabl a Comprenens i ve rol>i ci ed a 1. Pi an Pol' i c 2 .,1,1 i s sat'i sfi ed ,because Neighborhood Planing`' "Organization #5 and surroundings property "owners wi..11 `be �gi*en notice of ,public 'hearings* related to the request and :to their, 'opportunity to comment on the;. pr' oposal . Policy 4 .2 a 1 4:..s s ati sf i ed since; the site development . has ' ` gone through the development; review an building permit processes, and has' been shown to ,compiy with ippl cable Federal ,a .State-, and regional water quality requirements, including preparation and imp enkeotation of a non- po i nt , source pal l uti on control plan in 'compliance wi th' the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission's rul(Is for the Tualatin River Basin The 'proposed cedesigroati on 'does not, uy; itself, -affect coe;pl -i ance••.with' this Plan Policy. 3 o Plan Pol i,cy 4.: Z.1 emented through the devel o Ment. , revi ell rocess in ,which' building p l Acement and .l afidscapi ng have ben reviewed with; respect to minimizing noise impacts .of* the devei ,oing `,use upon neighboring land uses. i$ • Plan Policy 5.1a 1 is sati sf i er' because this ' proposal wi i l' eohanre' the . onomic y g ted area The subyect �iropert;/ _ located' .,c diversity of the Ti �, .� � ' � � �s � �, 147,thin a transition area be_ t, ,ieen predominantly off1cla uses to 'the north', algid industrial "uses to � the south. The ; 1,;P zotiie wi 11_ ' al 1 ow the sti ng /approved site development to accor Iodate a variety olfifi uses nistent with the nature of the:, surrounding area. • Plan Policies 7 a 1 a 2, 7.2.1, ,7 a 4.'4, and 7'6'1; are tlitisfied `'because adeo{ijate public service capacities :are avail "ale to serve the:site A fu l 1 . range• of puoia c serve ices `are currently, irpvi ded tip the ▪ Plan Policy 8.1.1 s sat i sfi ed `because the pr Qposed cedes i gna ion could '� actually d crease the site's demand On the public 'roadway system, endin upon the actual ©ccu a the o p ldin R tom are son mpay be made by a i i cup an " g nee art bon to the i e_ data. P PP - 9 A traff i s Pg Site Area . . • Building Area . Cl' Trip Generation IP Trip Gertieration a � e • • 7 2°°s 'ft. {.82.`'ac) 27,400 sg: 520 Fiche cl es per Day (In Code 11O/ 241 1!ehi cl es per lay ICE I ode. 10) rov Vme c�mm"erci al pl pan iteri,� : ndicate ,that TMsi e USES are they keyeIemeuts site characteristic !whiach' Of articular note i s .A surround thg uses,' wh �e ch 1 n Policy 12.3.1(b) prevl, esignation: b, SITES FOR LIGHT INO9STRIAL DEVEI.OPI ENT SH 1. SUFFERED FROM RESIDENTIAL AREA RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER '.OF= =THE ° A Cam T: s te. 2. LOCATED ON AN ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR STREET AND THAT!' TRAFFIC SHALL NOT BE CHANNELED '7HROUGH.^ RESIDENTIAL. A OMM N: The site has access to S.W. 72nd Avenue vi ,treet. THE SITE SHALL BE OF A SIZE AND`SMARE WHICH WILL PROVIDE F9 "FORT AHO LONG RANGE NEEDS OF THE . USE." a : The site can accOmmOda e t a existin devel op,nent 4 INTENDED :DEVELOPME SHALL THE LAND . ;INTEND..D FOR RATi TOPOGRAPHY OF `LESS THAN. 6% GRADE, +OR THAT , IT ' AN 'DE` DFMOE �lON I THAT TIIR�;��G�I ENGINEERING TEPHZ Dj � GATE. IQUES ALL LxNiITATIONs TO ', L� AND THE PROVISION ,0F SERVICES CAN. SE MITI • MM N T he site to g�rad es have been taken into cans derat 1 an development of such that extensive grading is not required. f IT BE `DEMONSTRATED' THP, ASSOCIATED.t ,EFFECTS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH' SURROUNDING `PROPERTIES.." rOMNIENT: Surrounding properties ire developed in light industrial and office uses, which are consi 'lent with; the' nature Waif the site. Exi sti ng landscaping ` and building . setbacks ;.ensure that no use:, conflicts wi.? 1 ,occur. L . ALL OTHER APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES CAN BE' 'MET.. comriF:,N,I: No con;fl lots with other plan pol" i ci ps have identified. YI ISF, AND' OTHER; ;EXTERNAL'' �IVITI'"" at�lwide, „Plannino' Go. een oal #1 (Citizen Involvement) Ji is satisfied because the City has adopted- ' o citizen 'involvement program i ncl udi n g review of all land use and .' , de velopment applications by neighborhood pl art.s ti na a, ' POs) . In addition publiC notice requn � .m en is r ” at� d to this application be satisfied. • 4. Goal #2 (Land Use Pla nning ) is satisfied e, catse the City Wn11 apply 1 ,appl i cabde .Statewide Planning Goal s\, C i ty of Tigard Comprehensive' Plan Policies, ;' and Community Development, Code requirements to the review of thi s proposal. Goal #9 (Economy of the 'State) is satisfied because the proposed redos i nati on', would increase the City's inventory of developable Light Industrial land on 'a parcel which is best suited for Industrial/IP uses. Goal' #12. (Transportation) is satisfied because the proposed IP designation will not increase potential site generated traffic, as documented by a traffic comparison in a preceding sect' C. ode Stan ±ards a Section 18.68.010 of the Code provides a s'tattsment of purpose for ''the IP District. y "1. Foy combifig light manufacturing,, office and complementary- related commercial uses, e:g , ' restaurant, barber. , shop, 'beauty salons, , and fitness , ci nters; 2. For combining uses which have no off -situ impacts in terms of nu`ise ' odor, glare, lights; vibration, smoke,, dust; c.; other types of off -site impacts, yscc�l�dde�y�.ur.' , a Cow: The ex i st�; n �g and pl armed development will accemmodat+e variety ©f uses th4 mE�et • the perfortiance standards.. • • �r di d •Whi6 h.. provide, for ;a circulation syst m that rovides �;:`r'ect access; o arterials or collectors that' w'i,l 1 i, channel * raff i c through resi ienti 1l area' " " „Thetreet and uti' ity pa��tern' iestabli shed. with access to a'coll� "ector street. Which ut li ze an internal circulation a,rstenn which c 1nnects to ad j�, i �n i ng sites;" 00 a: The subject site and an adjat:oent 1►arcel sh'ere 'an acteSs, point. � ' 't, ��a deed Which provide a o plete set. of pre, iolipo ,,,d restrictions (e.'g. estr-i cti ons, . restriction covenants, etc.) , that are ' enforceable , upo 3 all occupants of the. i and >�stri'al park i nci 411,7';;.1.4 . provisions for ” site improvement' building des`i gn, landscaping, s i V f , control ,' off- Street' ,' parking, anc; s a to maintenance. ntenance . Which provide evidence of continuing management responsibil enforce restrictions established , .upon the origi al deVel opmen' and" ' C: The subject site is under a Tz,'` ngle owners ensure appropriate maintenance. Which recognize the di ffe i i rtati on' ul re hts + employees and ' service '':eh1 a es. ' ; I ec uate prod on fog' publ' transit access. " SUI �'! N • it I i I This site, is lit , t n i ti onal area betwe�s thg redom nan of a tans 1 pl t1 ► ,,, �4, industrial' areas to the na th ;andl'south,:respectively. tlhe; adjacent, propertl,e, to the; east ;and west are z ©nee p an d ,ark i na ustri al I n char to r' ':The props se change to 1P 'sweets the requio ,criteria: ar.d respond t+o th+e nature Ind ',; ti i existing, s i ttl development, and 'also s =eons stept w �h `tire p bl i ■ O.:: i nfrastructur in the area • It i s therefor requo 10'00 that the plan , atil d Boning'; en :this , `s i.te hi changed 4o Light Industrial sand AP respectivielly.: by y t De ' nd ,Use N6W Land!: Us��. Regulation , Amendment Ytegolaton lease complete (Al for tl, � st aiaendMents ,, and ! B j foil map amend ent ► A. ,of ��. ct43 . fiction (A brief description is , ade �xate. Please. avoi �,...: highly technical ternts +nd zone code abbreviations ,Please: do not write. "see attached."): YAIM1,u11 Describe Hoer the Adopted Aiendwnit Differs Lfrom 'tthe 'Proposal (If it is the same, 'trite "Same." tf it was not proposed, write "N"..") : If the Acti? on ]mends the Plan or Zone Map, . Provide 'the Poliowing Inforaata,ou for Each Area Whica was Changer ( Provide a separate et4 eet for each area Multiple sheets can be submitted as, a single adoption action. Please include street address whenever possible. Do not use tax : lot number alone.): - Previous .Plan , Designata 0 2 New =Plan_`Designation:., Previous Zonet c- (coMnERC. L FROFE►$5IC A1L Location:.& uthear,3t rorne of. 72nd Ave. ,and 8W has (VICM Acreage Involved: 1.78 acres ....r, : Does this Change Include a Goal` E,iceptioAr. For Residential Changes P1ec se Ia dicate the Ch Units Per Net Acre ti Wt. If Notice of Proposal was, Not Sent to DLCD 45' Oaf s Please' Indicate ilby: Statewide Planning Goals are inapplicable Emergency (4irciumstance L bt Statewide Goals fhic.h . Nay ; 1pply: Prior to 'tZie . Final Heaaring, sired Expedited ; mv_iew List: any State or Federal Agencies, Local. Gosernsent or , Local Special. Seivi ui iltt'iots Which say be Interested, in or IlOacf`.ed by the Adoption: Direct yiaestio us and Cassents Jerry Offer, Associate Planner (Phone) ( 503). 639 -4171. Send To: Departnie zt of Land Conservatitm and Developinent 1115'0:Mitt Street& N.F Salent, Oregon 97310 -0590 i �, r p ens �,f Atkact� o�,�e (1) spy of the Adop�.ed! Action to � this � "�''��t and/Or 4.S�ree `i 3) Co d Materiale and !laps ,Larger er than 8 1/2 by 11 Inches. t ►° �: .r_f more copies of this form are needed, please contaot, 373 -0050, or this form ntal' be dt plicate on. green paper, L1ure t6 provido nice r b r Cam: of an adopted plan or land use amendment results in an extensic >n of the appeal period. ; Appeals Day be filed wi,tYin 21 days o _ the date , the 'proposl iLs mailed to DtCD Statutes require rPnilinq Within 5 days of the ac;t :on kill; oain t (See OAR 560- 18 -04a) n p CD a� , �.��� ' �`�. �.{}? der (pa >adoptfctrm * * p" 't o ' D OPTICS dHE 9 rove ao�ent t,o �1,ss�ac`ISa,l3dp S rv►i o a i c y B nk) aan l �Sas�Q��rrg o t t r u+rer s off► „�a t i on Mas r” i it:* „ „+ `fa it phis iieipnc t ors � thw` icp>Rp `n. ns ivs. p l:an 'snow be. cone rod : on. 't,h.so changes as ls►.; t i iii or a to note ho „ o son behind g �� ari ,d a ignat on °iii tie carte badly' consid ered. ear¢ � ” [ I 1 1`he chair tic tif tiff.. that„ the oa��tco ` Vacianc.� appal icat ,on had been denied by ,th• planning coaaissaon Reasons sere 'that ad egvato laid existed ca plying t',o code, pay a; ,s tips appropr ate surf c ing , °no special c i rcv*aistancos j xist landscsp #:.g., • roquir secnts fro a it a a e and no hardshr exist that, i�s .ir,ot sett�°isp►c�sed ` With ho furtilor ,pusiness,. approxi*atel y 9 :00 of rn. • w 1 He said there were t'.ree mai n reasons. for asking for a 43,5802260 tax 'base at this time: 1,, ' it is fiscally soundk to plan for:, `61Wa°'' City, and 'develop a si aF i e source of fi nanci ng over .a 1.ti -year . r1 u; Important to avoid dept eti on of the fund' bal'ance and the prob`Y eat associated with that; and 31 toe .City needs the increase '. i•n order to maintain current services i n the, face of . i ncro sed demand for' the .'sere► i ces. He poi nted to the growth in popul ati o�n, , wr l ch doe not increase the tax base, and the 15% t®, 20% inflation which increases : the costs of mai ntai°ni ng the services. He discussed', the language describing the tax base measure as it wi11 'appear oen the ba1'9ot and' Commune7u; ity Rel ati oos Coordinator Newton passed • out copies ofr` the bal 1 of . Finance Director Wayne Lowry discussed Ballot Measure 5, which is a Coristitutional Amendment VI phase in property tax limits of . $15/$1,000 over a 5 year period and to limit certain fees and charges rel ated to ownerhsi p of property. He advised there` is no plan as to how to R x1 limitation; there are many unanswered questions at implement e�nent the tax imi t n, and th this point. He explained there are two categories:. School Category and Mori School Category. He discussed how different fees and charges currently pad by property owners soul d affect the amount of revenue the City receives. He pointed out the many administrative difficulties of this typ e of system, as well as the unfavorable impact on Bancroft bonds and LIDs. PUBLIC HEARINGS I C0I'W RE' IENS YE PLAN, A�`�.FvN JMEIIT CPT g s 'CHAT E SQ -0008 N Ikz R, McC `ply , (NPO #5 i ° A requer+ t for Comprehensive 'Plan ` mends ent approva't from 'Commercial 'Profession.1 to Light. Industrial ari l a Zone Change from r' Professional to I�ndustriai Park. LOCATIONs Southeast earner Commercial Pr SW 72nd Avenue and S1 Sandburg Street I WC'h 2sl 1. DC , t ax 1 of 38001 Assistant Planner ;Jerry, ;Je rry, Offer i s cri bed site and exr i re d b. y thtah t e he one building will be remodeled and bejc� p i ed applicant, W. L. McCormack Compiny; and a new 14,000 square -foot g e. He reviewed the background of the will oe rons iwhhi ,Which. beenszPned C P (Com erc iai Professi oral ) burldin wi since u1983. He di ussed the busi n 1983. I pl armed by P_ :determining that theQCaanac ti vi ti es whit are � the appl i caea an i s rimari ly a professi ona,'i t, P y P and ad mi ni str ti ve idi rig management Services far cons :ruction projects; and they' t be .storing construction company row eq u.i nt on the site He said d the 1 a � p n an ..: change are bei rail w d z�� . ,. rr. �q�uested to .'�rraden the Lases that are al i a� ;�:�d ora the s�i te, � i nc1`edi�i tig n re' t t - i ated businesses wi n��the vie ni i of �hati on� A4si start applicant' �Cti© �P. s business. In discuss... g 't�! p . 9 ,� s. ifs the areas d -P and Idi n fa, Pe Planner neui cted out that there are a mi �: of , aui 1 some zoned Assi stagy; t Planner stated that comment was recoi ved from NPO recaiNnen� - the impact on th�e�Cd H�a r�ssedPthe� mourtance of 'ii ng that t cha P cansidere� When nges are mad , , understan.li ng the �tseacnn behind' a given designation, with Changes tieing carefu "fly s o; s tiered. PLANNING CO!r'!w!1 SIGN MINUTES OCTO OBE E .. � R 2 1990 PAG •e r s fft I A • <r advised there is not `a gre►t 'distinction i'. the'. plan p+alicies and locational criteria between C-��' sand I -L He said staff 'did' no tr feel there would. be any negative impacts on the adjacent .pru; - .,ties, i or there . is no' :.substantial .' difference in the uses generated by the twa zoa designations. - He , ssi d Staff recommended to Planning Coiwni ssi on..to: send r'rectlu endction to City Council for approval of the -request. There was di scbsi on concerning ng'''the Key Rank site which would remain Toned C =P. APPLICANT'S. PRESENTATION o ��ans Stout, Mckenzie %Saito, spoke on behal f of the applicant, McCormack and Con�parrr�y. Ne di sc'ussed the h►ackgrrund; of the, site,; wh14 �i was :;previously owned by , Key :`Bank . He said his 'firth researched, the mar nine the, best use for the' site Their research determined that the I -P zone 'desi nation wo' l0, ,he ;a ropr1ate' hated, on 9 Pp the' existing building style'' and change n' clilarraoter, of the area about: by new use's .,in' the area. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED ® _ objection to, t e request9 hatod Cotmii ssio,�w� Peter�st�ri st,.ted he had no on the trgement that, an error, was made in, zoning. o commissioner, Boone agreed that there should not be a w' problem' with the • requested zone change,,, He counted that it seemed unusual to have the zone change requested after the building on thesite was under construction. o Commi ssi over Castile advised , his company has wor!:ed for Mi-ito ack h ac i f i c i n the past; but he di b spot' believe this !.aoul c! rif l uen�e hi s decision in the matter He pointed out there i a shortage i 1++i+ I -P property i n Tigard, making it difficult for r�4 tai n busy nessea to_ 1 ocate in the Ci tY He said he was in, favor Of roe ommendi ng approve J of the request. Cennissioner Fessier agresd with the other Commissioners; and she said the look of the rrre:t of the area tends to be more industrial; and she felt there was a mistake in the on gi nal camp plan. She !did not have ' any objections to this zone' change request. President MC'n expressed some concd rn a i c!Eati nag a -P 1 s end of the property still owned IV Key Bank; but 'he said het agreed with the previous iCommissioners r_ e a rdi n the r ansi t n al a d mixed znoatnet e I Of P f the apra par � .l fitly since there are rf 9 properties Pointed out that 'Oast actions hale taken P rsl Pert � and Changed i - � t to tPso he favore a ddi ng more ' ,I -P Property to Tg and e s nventory Ile said approving this request wouldreu;� the b� I icant having n re as we Well as pti a vidin9 asi ��or rusriess location PLANNING COMMYSSION MIltiUTES - OCTOBER 9 ; 1993 PAGE'S b CPA a aiX`l' � 9i i s0 1 sr0e 1 ' 8 a � , ; as � ® i�� a1 d h''Msy , y e eY O� e1 ��. .e y1i J X� 9`gO t0 i ® r� • v ga �e0 d■I s d w /a ) i tg : 'G h c� otp n Mh9t� .e fisting :M't 1e, farm sience orditi on Q a 1 eq est or Se . develo ati �n 9ne�' r i��e rs,,a� -Me00�:nti .1 ssione i 0.T W ori " �Key ' .,0 :.' f e h r o-r �lY ry i f,� 0 g "iY 7 '' i o � �0e c 4 pri'' M1l not Si d' ' 1 t (, s, '4 c aipi e a p / p ■'1 �na' Y R 'd g rw',1e1.: " 1 rvht oi 0i` rS a f iect0 , r t .d a. i r f �e ` au„1as i'" 1c p 1 Qi n y ap{t 1; � k d p . r - ► ray nan1mfiil e� rr a n , d� i ,it h lafac r7.,:',:,- K t o.tprs r .^ 9ta/oc, d q r .f t . � 'ht }} shed:: for variant, eusi nes�ses .'conduct d :� the; r rs of t,. allow p) accent , o' ' a mane,f attyred .home do rth s for ra to :eras', es: � den e r 4 s at��a with the ,vari ou i rid str a eses' o thy' ,prope t . Yard a ce approval r to 1) allow he gel oceti on of ,'a or'8retakoa°s i'resi dencc ' '�� nth ° and �:���� � ��� 1 ®�, 2) all oar a . two -ray 66'r ewa�,: l ess ,,that e':''.2 24 feet i portion n : of .the i te, ` to gravel ° ' (In ',a LOCATION: 49740'.' SW Iirgac "d Street l`4cT Item was , postponed ,by apo-�? OTHER BUSINESS There other buss n� ADJOURNMENT 0:28 P.N. m PLANNI i 'r CO IS,S ON 'MINU` Sr MIDB it 1990 Arai! ;ice ; 5 k TA ' REPORT TO TER P1 9►NNING COMMISSION' ARIgG DAB:' CC' 2, 1990 - 7:30 PM BRARIMG , LOCATION; TIGARD ;CITY MALL-TWAIN IRALL 131.25 SW FIALL 13LVA. TIGARD, OR 97223 • PAOT General :Information CASE s Comprehensive Plan 'Amendment CPA 90 -000a Zone Change Bart 90 -000B REQOSST a 1. Plan map s.xtdment from Commercial : Professional to Light Industrial. • Bono change from C • (Profeesianal Commercial) district t I-P" (Industrial Park) zoning district. APPLIc "tT: W. L. McCorrnack. AGENT: Viac }'remise; /Saito a Asac. 7415 Pairwa;' Loop (Lana Stout) Wilsonvil le ,� , OR 97070 0690 Bancroft stress 770 0 PO Box 69039 Cane Same Portland, OR `:72031 -0029' LOCATION: Southeast cor»er of SW 72nd Avenue and SW £a ndburg Street. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: WCTM 251 :ACC, Tax Lot 3800 Background Information The plan for DiPO #5 was adopted b7 the City council be August 22, 1977. The plcn olnd correap& nding zoning designations Selected for the area of the subject site were Industrial Park (24 -4) on the north side of Sandbar g ®t �et a® v Industrial °2) the south e de. Both of these zoning d iatr to % ® all far both Commercial offioe and industrial uses. During the city -wide review of , the ComPrWheusive Plan in 1983, the zoning Vor the sub') et propertY, along ,with seve 'al ' other parcels receiving aocatia fr'a . Sa nttburg . Stmt, "AO changed C -P commercial Professional Along_ with the Change designcat:i,on, the 1, ,pit s�►, �~� permitted uses in the C-P zone i was 2educsa: The C-P Zone does not allow industrial uses that ueire 'e viousl Y silo led in the former M-2 none. In September , 1985, the City Council, reviewed a proposed ran Map redesi nation of 21 tax lath that receive access to Bandhsrg Street from , .,trial.� Profea t cos e 1 Light Industrial, and a� zone change from C-P to I-Po aPProved the redesign ati ®n for y p�ela, ,��y the n+ ', u the sub ,, property (CPA 5-85) .CL only o STAFF REP 00019 f ac. . Paco � iRs�:kc�� i��'�ta�ito .W ] • 7 � 10 on Julep 3, 1990: the Direato°r designee aoved a ree;u et by the arrant a licant for Site tee.®1opaa ent . o-iaw aapprcval to redr lvelop; the a iaatieng 14,432 422 square foci'., office/storage building On this 'a site for adminiet1. =ative off ices for a cons true do engineering rind nanagen ent fi w.' and to a3.1ow cornntrueation of e,A,de approximately 13,000 square foot flex -apace branding on the °asst side of the parcel. 413DR 90 -0012) . Redevr lopmegb of the site in accordance with this aPplioation is currently under way. r v to sit a lications�s involving the subject NO other land. uaae o,,, de a pme PP parcel have been reviswed: by the City of Tigard+ I iii r $n it„�Y ref Ararat i ®n �wi s.w�ew s iwwwe��+ Properties to the north and south are also zoned C -P and con; sin a variety of office uses. Properties.- to the east are zoned 1 arlcl include a variety of induatridl uses. The adjacent parcel to the east contain the Gould Pomp Company• Across SW 72nd hventne' from th i aub;ect site is a vacant parcel, that is zoned lop which is a part of the Tear h Center Industrial Park. Properties oto the northwest are zoned 0.4 and presently contains single - family residences or are vacant. SW 72nd Avenue abutting the situ it a 44 foot amide paved major collector street that includ®w oJurba and storm draLnage. , sidewalk does not exist on either side cif the street + ,SW Sandburg StreL t abutting the site is a Fully improved local street with sidewalks on both sides • titre Site Information d Pars�poem�,s. D = � ®�cr�.ia The 1-0 acre p r4eentl Y contains the 14:42 square foot combination office /storage building. A perking` lot containing approxim ,tely 60 parking Is lea: of the �ete�d on the north side driveway Connects the parking; Sandburg parcel. y - lot with S Street. The access contains a 14rge a Fiat of aaQatare landscaping including several large trees along, the SW ?2nd Avenue frontage= of the site and several oak trees Belong Sandburg street„ etdosn clan sat aaeting building p Th ®a 13.cannt is in th® rocelae e�f r ®1�. � �� $mg then 'ex .� g erring ntd eam in into an offices buildin for a► s;eanr g g . 9 iron pagproximetel. 44000 o feet o they ers set fl ®tors .,e acre t ,ice to' leaeing t anther epee. m tc ., ilea ®' the 3�P, �. �"a�, a :a►o bn c�etr�act3.oxn o � , se -� per' Of a u ®� 1�4, (��0 aquaa,es font aene��,�c ea building] or the eaat_ ride of the areal. 'fhb► project ia(. ez tin 4 rk . aroa tO altar and tb iaetiaig . e ea bta in anddirntho25 a�ds�i'tieaaae$a too .6t14.)60460011'4101LtSt#j ®f ' g par g P 1oeu '# sana�.bur: Str+e ®t to tine iii 1��La3ct tai coiasst� +di.a►�aa �+ar�c�.�resea�►� of �.he existing drive ,say. and treacle a� aneuvering area On then far eaaetea ed���i c them a to tear e ervQ a hootior ef ore :: head d�he onat * ieer�r ,�1�ca�atpae:e bexi).di sat B ell sea the office keuildin to t� e 'g STApia' REPORT - CPA 90-0008/SON 90 00CS ackesnsielsaitA se‘ ea' The applicaan �' regiaes to as Plan NAP Amendment from Comaercia9,. Professioi al to Light Industrial and a Z° no Change from ;the C--Ti (commercial Professional) zoning district to the I -P (Industrial Park) zoning district for the 1.8 acre parcel. The `!applicant has submitted a statement titled Pro,, al for a C rn lan ivee Plan Amendment and one Ch. age - W. L. McCormack and The PririarF intent of the regPeet is to broaden the nor of possible uses elle, v:ed in the development. • 8.genE End NPO Comments The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and offers the following comments: • ThG site is a3 rioady developed with paved parking and a ` building. 'Tha requoated will, not require any additional public i!aoil ities. • As desscrib d in the applice ni °s submittal, substantially less vehicles Per Qay' would he expected from potential Uses: in the proposed zone a.. compared to traffic generation anticipated from used permitted under the existing zoning- Furthermore, substantially less traffic during peak periods is typically associated with most industrial uses as compared to typical office uses. • The Engineering Department h as no objection te the proposed rezoning . The Building Division, `atValley d Rescue D3strict® Tigard Water District, General and have reviewed the pl'opoeal and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. • FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The applicable crater$ a in this case are Statewide Planning Goals* 10 7.1.2* 2, Ala, r ie fir , 4. 1 8.11, Seel 12; ®]�e�neiv+a Plan Policies 2.1.1* 4. 1 . , 7.2. , 7.4.4, 7".6 1, a.1.1a 8. 3, 12.2 1, 2.3 1 (.LOaational criteria for the Light Indu trial Plan designation) ; t nd the change or mistake judicial plan map amendment criteria of both the comPrehensive Plan a4� community Dea►ele a w,nt Code. In ddition, the proposed redessaiignatioa' e o ld be con p tau. consistent with thy, u de section for the requested 1-P zoning districts: Statewide _Plannng i,l® The Planning Division concluder that the proPeAai is cossi tent ultU, the applicable Statewide panning dtala based u po n tho following findLOgo: STAFF nEPORT CPA 8'0.00dg /tom 00--000S - 14ACkenzie/Saitee flea" , page W 44 W G`°al #1 (Citizen Invioly nt) j : satisfied ied becaaause the city has ddoptod a citizen involvement program including review of all land use and development applications by Neighborhood Planning Organizations (NPOaa) . NPO #5 is been informed of the application and has been provided with the opportunity to ' comment an the proposal. In 'dditionr public notice requirements .., all this application related _ to �h have been satisfied. . Goal #2 (Land Use Planning); is satisfied hecaaus the City tine applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals,. C4ty of Tigard Con)or.)heinsi'vELt y )evelo de req uiremants to the Plan polic3.a� ®, and Coa�unit p�a�t t.® review of this proposal. y State) because the proposed • Goal #9 (�c ®noa�e of the Staetoe is satisfied would increase the City's inventory of developable industrial land on a )arc 1 which is well suited for industrial use. The City has recently expressed aoncern0 with its limited amount of developable and /or leasable industrial lends in the City's review of a proposed plan amendment /wane change fast Spieker Partners further south on SW 72nd Avenue at SW Lower Boogies Ferry Road (C1 90 -0004) . The Cit y Council a bprov =d that application redesignat3.ag 6.6 acres from Plan although the industrial to commercial lava asna� zoning da�a►iga�iaadt,�.e�►nae malt Council indicated a desire to astintaain a sufficient o3evelo ble industrial land base. Tho present proposal would pa,\rtially replace the indu trial land lost through the Spieker redoaignat inn. • ! because he proposed 1.-P Goal #12 (Transportation) is satisfied 1� is not designation aic increase in n site generated traffic as described further under Polio! which follows. Plan _ Policies Staff has determined that the proposed Plan 834p; Amendment/Zone Change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings below: l Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied becauott Neighborhood Planning organization #5 and surrounding property owners w®r® given nGt ioe of the public hearin related to the saagaaaect m Za<► addition notice of the public hearing was published in the Tigard Times and was announced on a sign placed' on the site. Plan Policy 4.2.1 is satisfied since the site's IJ prc‘:.:.. `ts have been reviewed through the City's develoV ent reiriew and building Petinit Processes have been sh-o .� to c ... ly with applicable er al state, and water alit ra ti � �a�lr � t nt io an and i mplementation of a non-Point source Pollution control Plan and com p liance With the Oregon Environmental Quality C...... ission's rules f r the Tualatin liver Basin. The Proposed redesign . tion, 'With resulting changes in tip iusee Which might occupy the site, would not affect compliance with this plan Policy. STAPP gEPORT CPA 90- Oa06/ZQN 90 -0008 - a.%nzie /Sa to a - Rs Page 4' • an Policy 4.3.1 ® implemented as rated through the dell® n x�wiew g cce ®e in which building plac nt and landscaping ,have lean reviewed with resew, to minimizing noise ii acts of use of the site te upon adjacent land: uses. No significant note impacts would expedited due to light industrial USG a the property as compared to commercial nee permitted under the existing zoning. The . parcel down not abut typical noise' sensitive tive uses such ass residences, schools , day 'mare facilities, or retirement homes.' 4• Plan Policy 5.1.1 is satisfied' because this proposal would enhance' the economic diversity of the Tivd area. The' subject property is located within a tran®ition area between predominantly office ueeB to the north and industrial uses to the south. The Y -P zone will allots the existing approved site a developments to acccre odate a v set " of uses a oxe consistent with the nature of the surrounding are" than would be allowed under the C-P zone. 8. Plan Policy 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, and 7.6.1 are e. satisfied because a full range of, public service are currently vrovided to this ;Ate.. sOxli{ice providing review agencies have not raised away ieuea regarding their ability to provide service to this sits= if the Plan and zoning designations are changed. 6. Plan Policy 0.1.1 is satisfied because the proposed redesignation could decrease the demand on the public roadway ayet generated ed p usaesa ®n the property, depending upon ' the occupants of t he buildinge, a � esaea� ®d utilizing the Institute of Traffic Engineers rs (e �atio� o The applicants have provided the basic traffic aic traffio anal y ®i3, comparing projected trip. geaesar ation u sin g the Site o da ta and basic trip generation projections: site area @ • . A *: . • ... • m i @ . 79,1. :00 square feet (1.82 acre) bbed. area - 27;400 400 square . feet uilding Q+Lb�a •••.00 @••A.•O.O trip • 520 vehicles per da (ITE Code '-x'10) r 52 aeration ..... 241 vehicles per day ,,XTT Code 110) P tri �,enaeration ... • ... o Y P trip g The above analysis indicates t',,:hat the Plan/zone chase rested stivald . not be expected to significantly affect bhp transportation syetem - and could even result in a decrease in the potential for Vehicle trips generated by industrial use of the property under the =vested deli enaatioss as c cress to typical commercial us allowed by the current deaim atians a 7 plan Policy 1.1.3 is satisfied since, all necesasaary . Publio .; trOnt improves rats 'ATM in plate and have been aeaessased fear sufficioney Ltor serving the existing and proposed site deive:1„opments through the Site DeVelopmeft Review and ,8uilOing Permit gerocea deaA' 8. Plan Policy 12.2.1 provides locatienal , criteria i for Commercial Plan designations. The erciaL- :'rofeeeicsa1 Plan denignatioa criteria indt sate that site sruitabiiit o infrastructure, and adjacent land 'uses n loco . ... . g anal areas. � Nigh' ere the key elea�ta i' locating c a i�a�o oesi .. � Q . = ge 5 Rt'� "' CiPt'� CPA 9k� t�Ot�B ��5 .� � � nzie �Sai �' .tai ot- vi sibi4ity Ls a site chawracteristic , which ie not a quality. exhibited by . 'else subject site. . Of particular note is the 9tte'n location# . existing , ev'1opeotaent v, and surrounding uses which are not definitively Commercia-Profeasional in nature. The property therefore aright not bra yoroperly designated with the existing Commercial.- Professional Plan desilnation. Flan Policy 12.3,.1.b provides iocationaal criteria. ' for 'Light Industrial P an designations. The P . ,.s._. for ...a � Q„"OYq eh..e..n,_s.s.a.i, ve Plaxc, Amendment each o� these and Zone Chang�t '�'fr1i110p11�M10� �'1��11iwY�R /P��. criteria on page 3. Staa:f enerally, concurs with t McCormack and Cosa► arn� addressee er � .h this aan,46isy3 and borrows liberally bron the applicant in providing the following findings.' The 1r caational criteria are noteat in capital letters: s: 13/TES FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT' SSA E. • 1. BUFFERED FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO ASSURE THAT PRIVACY" AND THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF TEE AMA IS PRESERVED. 'O T' The only residontial develo nt in the vicinity of this site is to the nerthwent• across SW 72nd Avenue. Tha proposed redesignation and industrial use of this site would rot be anticipated to impact this residential area due to the sep = ration of these areas that is provided by S ' 72nd Avenue and because the buildings on the subject Property and traffic areas are set back some distance from the streets. . LOCATED ON AN ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR sTREET AND TRAM INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC SHWA NOT BE C ramr.. /MOWN RESi1 ENTTAI' AREAS." COMMENT: The site has access to SW 72nd Avenue, a maa jca collector street, via SW Sa ndburg Street. Neither of these streets channel tiraaffic through residential areas. • A SITE SHALL BE Cn' A ZIZE AND SHAPE '6 IC8 WILL PRiavrine rola Taa SHORT AND LONG RANGE NF,EDS TUE USE." The e! to can accomodate the cci +ati ng uses as well. fug potential future irduutaia1 , a eec withth the Confines of thee! buildings"' sixes. 1. TUN LAND INTENriED FOR DEvELOPNENT S RAC AN AVERAdE SITE RAPWY' of SS IV AN 6 PERCZ'..�C. GRAD 'OR l:i tAT 'IT I DEMONSTRATED TOP'S � MAT THROUGH rAnO N TECHNIQUES P LIMITATIONS TO DEVELOP1 NT AND THE PROVISION OF 'SEA' S' CAN BE MITIGATAID," COMMENT: the .v ' t 1g have b�cO n t consideration in grading to saie�;ru�.sa9i� bent � laffiraa� each tnts�t e�e�►� +� e:la��din►gt �vasa not required • ® P� P' cony t he parop ty. The nit+ foil the Current n t grading /liana have revi.raius 1 4 t en say an .. ea<rrdan c cav ®d '`by the pity of 'f'i,+�atd Building' Division. II ►RT ® CPA 90-•0008/20N 00a scken i STAFF ' �� at0 ' A»is~i +e~. � Pee 6 e IT caN BE DEMONSTRATED THhT ASSOCIATED LIGHTS, NOISE, AD OTECR EXTERNAL AFFECTS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE ACTIVITIES ABD u' SES ON SURRODOD1NG PROPERTIES poYTa Sawr ®undin g p ro pi �tiee are � de�elo d with office and industrie +. uses which are largely consistent with the types of uses that would be permitted on the subject property under the requested Light Industrial Plan and /-P zoning designations. p g building back should reduce the Existing l ®c • tential for light, and noise impacts and other potential conflicts with adjacent uses). I -P Zoning District The purpossile statement for the I zoning district states that the zone is intended: for combining light .manufacturing, office and complimentary related commercial uses a . for 'cosy bining uses which have no off -site impacts in terms of noise, odes, glare, lights, vibrta�t ion, smoke, duet, or other types of off -site impacts .... for combining Parking, lnscapi a* and other design: features which physically and 'visually aid atru:tres and uses within one development � prohibit residential use .... which uzilize a b si c street and utility patters which will permit flexibility in the Mize of industrial sites which provide for a circulation system that provides direct access to arterials or collectors that will not channel traffic through residential area .. . which utilize an internal circulation system which connects to aad olnin sites.-c,- which ,provide the colete set of Pre g p e�ists��ao ®ed restrictions (e.g. , deed restrictions, restriction of covenants, etc.) that are enforceable upon alL occi'panta of the 1 n d u�tri�l p ark including p rev f p at � building de ign, landscap ing, i gn ontrol, of f� ®tre ®tpaCki, , ,g and site maintenance .... which provide evidence of continuing management .responsibii°,,ity to enforce restrictions established upon. the original development plan and which recognize the differing transportation requirements of the employees and aervico vehicles with adequate Provision for Public transit access -" Thy applicant: hart addrea ®ed thins j sr'poee statement in the al ' fo gi � F ent a des3 Yr1�ith the stop relation® PiStaff coacure. with the ag�plicant nee -see nt oil' the c as �, lic hrnersc�,+snt . as►d done �l'aang® etaten n consistency between the proposed r deeignatiOn d the pnrpoee Statementi.. Existing and plaarnosi be abl, to ac ate a va:�ie�z�.. of, industrial and office. uses that wi' et�o�x �, nsisstent w�.th the t' ...: �. 1l be co �+n�i�°e'� d peri�ox°�tance etanda�cl® aagapl1.caahl® t� the ssnanreew csnssas;��s�;i+��nt ��. an planned to be operated ao a singe h j p p9 .. a ing area lb nonresidential in sad aceat ro i�-I�ies. spite and ssaua�round The. character thatactet4 he street and util t as � liehed, The' nito ha s is eet that win s :irectetraff$ .. o other sollect~or access® to � u:ollector sett c t and a 4riaal streets wit . o' icough reeiden' tial net hb orhoodd T he eu j 1;'t �ite , and an adjacent Parcel, the Dan , pac to the south, share aun access drive on Stret:. The �g s�aisrs;d)aurg Y - ackenrie/'Sait9 & head: o ce aubioot site is under a single ownership which should ensure appropriate � maivte�nance of the entire site and its buildings. Finall y , Tri i MQ t route, 38 Apr. >vides bus service to this site on St 22nd Avenue Chtnc e o Mistake In or der to approve a' quasi-judicial amendment to the Plan and zoning maps, the 0#,ty gust loo find evidence of a change in the neighbo °hood or community which affects the Parcel. Alternatively, the City isu ®t fund that there was a misstals a or ine onsistencY wi t h regard � to designation of the parcel (Csnpa eh ereive Plan . Volume 1 I o . Policy 1.1 .1, 1mpintation Strategy Two; CommunitY development Code, Section 18.22.040.a). as noted under ba sound informatics ° earlier in this reports the area within which the site is located %as studied by the City in 1985 and the area ,vtas partially rezoned to I-P in response to concerns that the actual hand uses were not consistent with the C .P zoning in effect at that r. tale. Although the building on this parcel has somewhat of an industrial character, the uee of the property at that tame was predominantly an of f ice-type use and hence the property s f e a lP, r e nsa'�r z retain ro erties in the Brea. The P zoning of all of its � Preferred for a�. � s ` �. the CpP zoning to t�Rae�; this parcel was therefore retained the recent dale of the property current owner has precipitated a desire to more acrurateAy plan and zone the property with regard to the character of the site ier4Ptovements aid the surrounding area. This history of events indicates that the City previously pe rceived a mistake in the original plan /zone designations in this area and if the p ,+ likely would have been property o�>rra ®r at that time had desired, oon�!inue ® ®toi rezoned to i -P in 1985. This condition exissat with east and of industrial character abutted by similar develc west that are alread y toned I-P. therefore, Lt i.e clear that a mi ®take was _ made in the original deaignat Lon and that 1 -P i.ssa, a more appropriate designation to reflect the transitional nature of the area between the -W uses to the south. Stafff adds that office u®® tr• the north and indu ®trial. eas��a � thie t of application in the area. this may not l � � y be the last '� we see It appears y that other proprertiest3 to the south which are bote. be more suitably deve1op+ed with industrial t a srs likely developed end uaadevelo , ��° y '" suitably �, h �. eai+C4��1 uses. Bart./ever, those rape rti ®s are not. ca�rrentl before t and Council for redeeignation IlEcommENDATION The planning Division recommends that the ;Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the city Council for approva ;, . Plan rae: � 1 of, hea��fvess Amendment 9 ® -0® ®8. and Zone change �'d�I'i 9Si --�3ii 08 bass w d upon the foregoing findings. �r . ... PREP STAPP RE prey r, anIt° A Planner IY: Keith tiden Senior Pi et Cl008/ZO 9e -0008 t ckensie/Sait¢a • dgif l t r 4 t 1 y r Th at 1iet, ray tes' .t0,0 la aT06 the zoniai corner do 72nd. Avenue 1 � Profeen iona . :to Inds tr aI Paark 113,, d : vvlo d; with paved a t aaq . aana ~' a ' aii3 d ag. ,. T r iee r ezv niadg ,will, 40tH,,regnire any additiona :. lic iliti rya n 441ne4 iaa. t - . �te egplidaunt ,iiub0itta7l o %;eeb ®tititttially ,l+'�a .^a3►04i41.e34 dap Le expected fro t'be proposed zoni :Oast' rs he a cieti e�' iWone. arther1i�Eor eub to rut ally l yea tra f f is during Via.% ar ode ' i a .ao' expected. .Rec endEtt R9�1e: The Engineering DePart==ent hag no objection to the ropo ed re coning, Randall R Woole neer Nets To THE TRAUP , Ross OLSON 'Qi55 S.V. I B1IGAD0ON COURT Su1TE D BEAVERTON..OREGON 97005 SIG tA3E WITH REPLY. KEEP PIN FROM: > *Tigard ;;Planning Departmen ; ' �� , P ,�A rapn ra ,.A:. P 9 -o ').;,r; " � , ; " 944° , W. L Mc 'A .A sr NP® ' 85 regueSt:•..for • ;CoMpreheneptre, Plan' ;;AmendMent approval from Commercial Professional , to Light , Indusstr; ial o Also ested is ai Zone', Change from Commercial professional to gn.. triel. Pars. (cc neraial Professioni�l) LOCATION: Southeast corner of ;SW ; 7 nd Avenue • • MI6 rnd SW ,Sandburg' Street WW'C'TM 281 1D0, ' #i. x lot 3800Y. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's etateri nt for your review.. , From nfor>!saa ion' eaippliis by various departments r and agencies, and from othOr .le to our ,staf, revert and recommend tion u ur1�e l ,be rendered on, in£or�ation available' g• a re pr ®pared and .a �s:ac:��ion wil the .proposal in ��he near,., f *. If you wish to cos ', nt on ,this 'application, we need your co c s by ' 1906. You may use the :pace provided' below or attach a separate Aetter to return our ceo nts . f r are b the ove d .' please phone the Staff contact noted r below with your comments and- conk.. your comments l in as soon as soBssibleo If you have any quest,asati, reading this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box, 23397,, 1�. 3,25 ,SST Hall' Blvd, , Tigard, CR 97223. PHONE: L.63974171. STAN" CONTACT: �J'erry Qf fer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THU APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to ' it o Please contact of our o ;five. Please refer to the enclosed letter. r r Written Conn ®nt sas s 1to, '111% 471e. 01-ex a e, 4 *kik" '42- 6 SA.41,044. Name of ` Person commenting: '- Phe, a Number: 463 `t b CPS 9O -08.M011 r W.L. '..McCO CK (NPO its) R request for Comprehensive Plan Amend Ment approval from Commercial Professional to Light Inch atria'l.; Also requested is a > Zone Change , from Commercial Professional al to' Industrial 'Perri.. ZONS: (Commercial Profese ®nal) LOCATION: Southeast corner of SW 72nd . Avenue and STip, Sandberg Street (WCTM 281 1D0, tax'. lot 3800) •1• I Attacked i® the site plan, a pplicant' ois ctatei nt ` for: ar nevi . From informations a u►ppl er bN. VarieUis ag3ncies and from 'ether • information avaLl role to staff, a ►rt ,and recOMMendation, a►ill bs; prepared ':,and a decision w 1.l' bia rendered,' on the pr ocisal 1.4 ,the 'near future. If' ion wish to comment fen' thi:: application,„ we ]Deed .y oar :At'' by ,' , 3] 199® . . you may n ® e the r ep a c o provided vided belo or, a�taYtnt a ®e ■ a® letter' to o emsame , retu6r to 14' ple6ae phone the Hiitaff contaa %t noted below with your' co ente and confirm youtr .r�, enta in w �.t g sa goon- a '?oaaible. If you. have ny many ,one regardin9;t tkfiia; Matter', cOntaelt thee' Tigard ,Planning ` Do artment, PO Box 23397, 13125 SO y g l P 97223. ` y Nall Elvd ? �i 81r �� S_:'A,LOF CONTACt:? . Jar r al; `i... er... _ r�.e.. .. amps CHEC ( THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal al and have no objections to it. Please refer to the e''iclosed letter Written Corments;s...:.. Hams of Persona Commenting: Phone 'Number: bkmit.:::PA90-08.SRM 4, FROM: Tigard Planningl)epan uru... sue: RS = �, 2 I .0 .4-29: -00. 4opE R ° ZON 9n'` 7 W.L. McCd GE (NPO 8S). A meat for ,Compr.henaive Phi ` "A�aasndaorsot approval fd Commercial Professional',; to Light Induotrial. Also.' egsest is a Zone Change : from Comeroial: Professional toy' icidustrial I Park.° (Coamaerc,ial Professional) LOCATION: Southeast -*tinier of .SW', 72nd Avenue and SW Bandburg Street (WCTH 2S1 IDC, tax lot 3800) . Attached 'is the Site Plan and applicant's statealnt ; for , your r revie j . Fres ► information, supplied iby various departments and and a9 ncies and from other c our ;staff,. , ;r�zport and recommendation. will be .information available. iv o � prepared and a decision will b( rendered on the proposal. in the near 'future. If you wish to =meat on this 4atiplication, ilia Seel mar ea■ enta by Ate. 31 1.92g. You may use the apace provided beliyw rase attach a separate letter to return. your aoaQmente 4, IL yu w u bit 1e to r eeSnn ' by thti e a wl d please phone the staff contact � onI your '• ° ,s and confirm your comments in writing as soon aposeible. If you aaw anY' Questions regarding this aaatter, contact the '`Tigard P).avetng .Department, PO Box 23397 11312S SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 6;.4}9-44177,44. NTAPIr CONTACT: . Jar ex: , PLEASE empc THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY! ) We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it... Please dontaet .�_. Of our of f is Please refer to the enolo3ed.letter.' Written Commen'Cs :_,;,_„_, F; Name of Person CorrraentinfJ: , Phone Number: bkm /CPGA90- 0(3.1�)1KM *rl 'IS'1�+� �'�LI ■� SGT° �r ~-.w. 4. • %leftist 2 M iIEI� Y VE `PLAN AM Na DMEN`I' . C'P90 =0005 Zd 1E CHAII�G$ ZON 9 �_ 0008 �h. L . Mcc oI tMAC { NPO #5) A' re set :fox rehen s+ eve P1s Aateadment apkroval 'roan ,1,0m me Profeae'&.onal to fight;: Induetr,L 1.. Alaeio requested fie a Zone Change from erci �� Profseeion it to Industrial. Par; .: !ONE:= (Commercial Profeaa�iona3 -) LOC,�ITIOIOs° . Southeast corner' of SW 72nd Ave�aue and SW Sa�ndhur'g Street` (WCTtI 251 1DC, tax `lot 38b0,� ttached ;ie the Site Plan tnd, applica t' a Statement i`ru Information Supplied by various department's A►I L'1 X LE & formation availa3bl�.r to our ' S ., A A Alm A� cepareid and a dec5.aion will be rendered o. t4 r F Dig E °you : w3:►ah to ccw nent' on this. � l, G i90 You' easy u the apace provided below c �,'� gIRCaL4 ee t ROCILIE turn your ar,.aamentB. 7[f vou .acre. etna Dep. ty Fire M' rsg aI tone the Staff contact noted below with you , ;. Plans Examinasr comments in writing as Soon an poasible. 7 r ,1410 5,p3.526�� ".42 • this matter, contact the Tigard Planning g� FAX 4 G Ball Blvd., Tigard „' GR 97223. PHONE: 639 - 41714, RFC F#ES�' , w..tary.Or! .r, ., Offer r STAPP CONTACT: MASE CAE= FOLLOWING ITP''i 5 THAT A PLY: ed the prop i and have no o j it. we have reviewed b acti�ine to it lease contact of our offices Please refer to the enclosed letter. 'Written Comaenta : o and Planning De DATs: ..ms t�.. i99O RT s 4 O IEBIN ENB $ ' Fit/ , IAWNAM INT ` CPA 9 -A008 Ol : _„ O 907 t, ,,. ,�. aTP'o� �5 A � e ®t t � F hat�sive Plan' ��� , I ,• , ( #5) Vie dannt ,sreval front Commercial Profosieional to Light Indue+triail. Also requ1/4 ',4ome is a I`Zone ,Change ? from Commercial. : Professional to Industrial ;Park. 2, ;, B (Commercial, Professional) LOCATION: Southeast corner of :SW 72nd Aven. and SW Sandburg Street (WCTM 281 1DC, tax lot 31300) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant ° a Statement for your rovieww.' inforTztion ' supplied by variots departments and agencies and R from other inforiaation available to ` our staff, a report ,and recommendation Will be prepared and a , decision , will be rendered on the proposal in the -,near', future., If you wish to comment on this application, we: need yens Ca tw by Ana 31;; 1990. You may une the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return, your rcomn ents. If -you ar'e u.�ab9t. Il 3r t1h®, aY ove 'deter. please phone' ' ; the staff 'contact noted below 'with your con` rents and . confirm goer comments in writing as Boon ae possible. ' I If you ',have any questions regarding Halh, Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223. Pia g Department,' 9`Id .13125 SW ,, a g T#,gard Planning this mattex contact the �: 6a� -a1 ?la FO Box 233 aryr coNTACT: derry O fey LXASB CHECK MB POLLOWI SIC ' ITBMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the pro oral and have no obj ctions to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the uciosed letter. Written Comments: n Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number:: bk®/CPA90 - -08. BmM 1 . v.... ....orr 41.ilsewamisk ' ,iwk ;,,, :., ,.. ,'.,,.* ,,,,..;;, . ' • - . ....•:,‘,.:•i,',. ';',,:=','•.',' .'%:-::,,•,;•,,,,,,,,,,,',::', ..., ' • ' , .',. , • ,..- ..„-:',..•...,,,,,'.',.,„.•,‘ ','= ,--;. '',.,',. ' ..,•,. ...:,,ii .,.„ ',.:.,, , .- , , ,',, „, a Tigard ,ponnintr- Department ..„,,,,,,' , ., • „ , 1 ,‘,.., 7, ' . '.'.' , . , i I * I t 1 1 i 7 4 1 i , . 5. r 0 t 41 2i2I°0 a 1,0 li 1 i ,I k. % 16 ! , t40:11Ltlif., , Li ii: 1410 i ii* iiiii,t sli t;, r0 i.' ' a: ' *'il, " t:;3a *°, : : ' IF,"ttii' . ?, , :: \,,i',' 64' .1 f i ta ilia (it' ' 1: MC'CORIFk4 ; : , (NPO #5), , A initur#ai. for cicenPrahansiv,er4,,Plan lilicaidaiitit':-' .,.,, , 1. fivtan°611jege frtOrLe1.111. ,' j.",,, mi,c:irit°asioutiLt6henaule. corner :: ilW.. 721141„:., 4, ‘. 4211 in a zone . i nal) LOCATION: ', „..;',.: . 3800). ,* •' '' ' ' '.1:-.- .' 6"r°741 ''' ' ' .- COmmerc a .,, . ' . . °Lail 13rcifeilli a '' iSl•'1DC, !Or•'''Llt f:trillie' ,itvirsindbeirg ptreet :,' (101114 . , , , , , • , , , , , , . ,.. , , , , , , Attached.,is the Site Plan and applicant's iitatetnetit, for your review. ' Fres'. infOrstai. tItaii - :filpfil's,..itt ' by various de)7aiiiimitt,.. t'ili4 agenLes and 'iron . 'ether inforMa'4ion available to our staff, a ‘2.14,tsport.'' i*tt . recommendation ' will ' be''''',' prepared and a decision will be rend:trod, ■.;.-ti'.,this,:ProPOiil in the near i!utli.e.,4"','. If you 'Wish to ,actaent on -this iippliottiOnit'*e we ed your arilovilt• bY' CILL.;...alo ' :.1 • ' '', n 1990. ,, ,. %tit MST ' ' use ' the Space ' proiii(,led bellow or attach :e.- \liati?arat,* .letter' to return, your comepts... , If ' • u.i ',3 ' ' ' ... ' .. : ,`:__......i..4.2' ..: .01,113114:v phone the staff 'Conte:it noted be10.1 with your Compbants' and nonfire.,„ ' your • ' • • . - .., ,ummentit in vomiting as noon as possible. , If you have 'anY..quegit*Pui''*041,1kiedille' this setter, coni.-,act the Tigard ,Planning' Department, 'PO Hat: ', 233970 ;14125 SW , , . , ., .. Hall Elvd. k 'Tirjard,'GR 9722S4 -PHONat 639-417141 , 1' , , 1 ,H,, , PLEASE CHECK THE IMIALOWING ITEMS THAI APPLY: • We have reviewed the proposal. and have no objections to it. Neune of Person Cementing: Phone Number: %.7 o^ a Tigard 'Planning De DATE °. samzem ' - '.. .;x 00 _ jaguismaL (Ci 'clomp WL *, MoC.. NPO #5 r eet for reheasiv® Pl,;an ndrueflt . a�pprasval (from' 0Ortmeroial ProfeeG.lonal `to Light equ steel ie .a Zone hangs „from CommerF,ia1 Professional. to Indce►tr al. Park. ZoNta (Gc� erai tl Professional) '..Southeast corner of ., SW± 72nd Avenue' an <1 'SW SMdburg Street (wept 2St 1DC, ;tax; lot 381:0) X \fitached to •that ' Site Playa and applicant • a etatstaent for; your ' review. aaco�aa ittfo ms.ion Supplied by vas .oue departeente and agencies and fres a other information available to our staff, a report and rec- gradation will he prepared and ' a decision '1411 be rendered on the proposal in' ,the near future. You the .a c. p rovidad belQa o t a.",il te� ats b � letter to rei v your coaraments. u `ab a es D .please ed below is in. writi with your cane ys sail couiErm Youx �htins � th® staff 'aontac>v, not ' � +:e. - an quesitioias regarding c seen ag ae soon al eaib u 'have c®d If yo 11116' tinatter, `contact the Tigard ? :,�; ring; De �vetn eflt, PO Box " 23397, 13125 SW Nall elvd�. , Tigard, OR 97223. 639,4171 STAFF PLEASE C CX TH : Otto4ING 1T3 THAT APPLY 8 We havo re viewed the proPo _ p sal and haoo � hns to it no oU eco Please contact , _. of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Commuter. o�rJlp�1�11A1�YNi Dams 0E 't Son colmentt ng Phone Nn l ber i 6 3.9;- 1 - 5..5,4 ykm /CPA90- 08.11K 0 er, 1 i ° niStrator I�IV�ii i��11N1111 'I; 4 estio s 1'and Comnien° NOTE: If I'm ore, copies of t is form `are, needed, office at 3/3-00.50; or this form may be dep�.ca�t Please be advised that statutes require, the ..., d provided. ,A general description of the � me Cde sufficient. Proposed plan and land use r:egn ,a tit sent to !DLCD at 'least` 45, days prior t0 t'tie fanal (See OAR 660.48 .020) . k,.,. J • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: CPA 90-0008 / 2ON 90 -0008 FILE TITLE: W.L. MoCORWAcE APPLICANT: W.L. McCORMAC);Z 7418 FAIRWAY n00P WILSONVILLE, Ca 97070 OWNER: SAME REQUECT: Applicant requests a Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval frac , Commercial Professional to Light Industrial. Applicant also requests ; a Zone g l Park. Chan e► from Co �Coram®r�c�.aZ Professional to industrial LOCATION: Southeast corner of ;.ghl 72nd Avenue and SW Sandberg Street (WCTM 281 1DCotax lot 3800) ZONING DRSIGNATION: C -P (Commercial Professional) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DFdWGNATION: Commercial Professional NPO NO: CHAIRPERSON: Craig Hopkins' PHONE: 639 -5823 STAFF DECISION X PLANNING COMMISSION' HEARINGS oFFICER CITY COUNCIL DATE / -/'7 TIME _: DATE /. _/ TIME DATE _._; ,_�_ TIC �X REQUEST FOR COMMENTS (see attached list) ATTACHMENTS: X VICINITY' MAP X NARRATIVE r. SITE PLAN STA'F CONTACT PERSON: Jerry Offer PREPARE FOR R APPROVAL: PLANNER X ADVERTISEMENT TIMES ,�/__ /„ OREGONIAN /„� .. , P RTY OWNERS TO BE X NOTICE TO PROPS HAILED / %,,,_, . /.' LETTER OF oF APPLICATION / ACCEPTANCE , NOTICE TO DLCD - ATTACHMENTS: RETURN BY LAfDSCAPING PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN -q.' N,e1t�2�'w. _ .R. 2 - , /, , ., �se3 y TERM:. ! e H0, 20,�l, F!1 92.21; �e W i7361,0,.. - �...�•.�//.7� vs �. t 98•14112 - -. a0' N_ x•24 W �►0 r s. iv_C t 1300 so 310 ,�.� 1 .,. 1 500 C� Ia' - a -6a Ac • s ,� ( I "s 03'17.1, I s,Q ti aresr s.ts coy °t e' U. C TO ►WLIC` !!S 329 tNlrr�t. 4602 a _ 3 • ND BURG ,, . = BURG � 29.9 Ac. TREET 9s:3r _� :si•ssE__ air 135:4$ 0: cm INITIAL ±.:1 . i` /.T6�e POINT > r, Zoo 1 3301 'r' it ss•24'w M epee" 'T'ep'+6f i'' "% "1- 31 °� t 25400 sae et: `; .- '' v quo ' � � . N 21.14 47.E 3 ONE. ELI: SE- CO w:w- ONANAM LC-35 us ?TER RECORDING 1 MACorr ol2 7415 r.trwsy. Loop Vid z/, A �w5iRl IS ' RzQVE�1TE a ► TAX . STATIMMITS S aLL BE . SENT WIZ 1O WING s William L. MCCor ac 7413 F'a lrWar Loop w ao KEY BANK OF OREGON, an Oregon, corpors ion (herein "Grantor')' conveys and warrants to W/ L1.1.14 L. McCORMACR and DARLENE T. HcC©RMACX (collectively !Grantee ") the zeal, property described on Exhibit Air attached this incorporated 3.s ro��xence Inca o Real. Property"). ") . h The Real Property herein (herein th � Y~, is free p "E" �tttaohod from alb, ' on�uxanaos except •• A�iacrlaod on Exhibit hereto and by this reference ino or p Ora e herein. THIS XV$lt��NT WILt NAT ALLOW USE 0F THE PRO PERTY DE SCtIBE D N THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OP APPLI CA$LL LAND USE CANS AND REGULATIONS. aE?oPE SXG2!ING on ACCEPTING THIS 'INSTRUMENT PERSON ACQUIRING PEE TX'`•E _u _ WITH THE TO THE PROPERTY SHt�V�D C APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY D USES. . Clay y • 90. L1Rr�D this �� s � of r7`ul Le ' �.� Kat Bit OF OREGON, • an Oregon corporation STATE OF OREGON 'County of Multnomah The foregoing instrument was ac:know�lsdged before 'me thi . day of July 3,9�y0, by 'sir _�__.v__ ` .. �. an ,� authorized ages of Key Asa of Oregon an Ore on wx., oral Oh, On behai f of the corporation y ARY PUBLIC 0 - 0,-,44'..,,- , )(If COm iasio • Pxpiras s .STATUTORY WARRANTY DELO' •■••• wow ,._ - 4'", ,‘ ';',',i•• :::;','.'.1.'''.' . •,,,, ,,,' ,-,•i r `. 4 „,,' 0- ,..'‘ilit,„. li ' 4.1, , ' : oi 10 'ts se "esti ,, z t 4 . 4 ' VAIV,Illt,41' of ' , a al . sl r,011.. 0 0 74 i .i., i,,, toil , .,.. 4 7 ,, 1114, CGS Ilt,:':i1Or4,13114141 A '..ths iOst '1/011terii 6"eubillOat:''Odra4 o th. Z*ipiit 'recila-'446' llositeer. sh 696' 68j9• Sou 11,4•53• !alit. along t' u iin.f as T „‘ .,..,, tne Z II 1 t,,-riiiitti•of-tealt. in. ofl,W. 72nd iiiii4itise e ', ars4 the ' POini.- c biginatali 'thencsI# "'e,ontipallin outh '4)8 ,8 6t'ai-'61-1'10 'the 114,rt)1 .linfo‘, of',°494itienient' Lot • 4.,. .4 ,iiistapea •.it,,, 410i3O gOiti' rr,th,ee* ge:iutit siar612 01 'to.i,r.h6,” t,*11 t ' ,:11:ght-(2t4bii..811", 1it16. of $.W. •7264 , A vitfluil 0 . 0 disitlinta ' ct. 300.0 ' foot thane. ',..:,,P•lrit,',. ' . ' ell31 10,:sost .11-ttralisi to a tho.iiox'fah', ii:ne ,:ct''Gairglina0.:It .7662i',' '4'4 .4 , ,. Advt, ,oi"inittilft.;'",g)ft t' h(t)tenc4e.10,11.00g't.filoG,At, jp:ot g 1'11 .d;40,4 riiiht•ct a.iiay''' ,litia 'tif:.''.7ind,''" 1,05.11t,,, of be 1 i ti is al 1r 2, ght-'of ii t , . if zia% tkg • . ,, , -, ,,y Stt * (:, h. trtto . . RXCXP'I'ING ...T/IXRJSIPILCIOI that siortipri 410licelbod J.4 be ed It''•aor'dsd cte)ber 3, 947, dre:iTctifIttieZ2%3gre'aordil4 47*aliaiGY 11 198 u c113111/711:ilii: lloroitka z9:41t70 that 33;tacs.,:i_iri:7ref, 11404,4cer3i.ob0.9(179,in PkiteleL'' Zit '366 filet af the i 20 :tett Ci.tri, 6*, vigitrAL- *ooutt,ty or .4hiz4to 21 Statts , I " ' • • TtCN C*NTUN ORIVt 4.31,1 :p rG�IE ,I.i: sI[VI Li Fir • • s o • • A R .a L vim .���s� a s OA If I� in;ai dy.,..,..,:-.- „TN ,,, 1 . y iazir ,„„. tzrge E■ ''Q ELEMENTt`.RV .. 2,CM61 L a I • T NM C • .• _ • ■••• ■ • • • • -0 A • •- •p • ■ • •• S • ■ :a • • • o ■ ■ • • • •. !a • • 0 •=••. • It • •_ • • • • •.. • a, 9 • a • ._je • • • • • . e • • -• •a - s • • • • • e •lb • • • .• • • a • • • -• • •••• • .• • -• ••••• • • -• • • •• .• e • • • • • i . • • • • • • • • Xil MANS CENTER DRIVE L- *1(DMA R I • • e • o • 0 &. e• • • - 14,•-• • - 0NTAM VIEW 1A- 4 The retrauirement th plans be updated. The 131121 will be that the plan, as the land use polity for Tigard, refh siineets ' and cirx:unastances of the qty. FINDINGS " o Bch plan, adopted under the land Cociservation cad Devel t ssicn s Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines must meet the foL : Goal #3: Preserve are maintain agricultural lands be.yand the Urban Growth Boundary of the camminity; 4 Goal #4: Cor erye forest lands, urba uses, "'.' not c�n�.tt�d �fGx. for strictly forest uses; Goal #5: Conserve opea space reS rc3S; ?,e 6. Goal #6: Maintain mid income the quail + of afr, , pia resources; a. 7 Goal. #7 • Protect -..i1e acxnrn.Anity' s life ' and property ram disaster and hazard area s • needs of resident,?; cif the 8 * Goal #8 : the he recxeztional State, and visitors; Goal #9: Diversify al rove the of y fi ' c rid ' State 10. Gal #10: -oxide adequace housing for the ' needs of the ccmmiuni t region aria state; Lnw Density Residential 1. 5 ni s t°o applicable zoning c.t strict. axe,_ all single fa mil residential (R- R-2, R--3.5 and R- 54.5).. 41a, Density' itesideV - 6 to 12 ora le family and R- applicable zoning d,;r��ttick are a�.t�T:p y R-12). - High Density Rs1dirtl. i - Medium ty The applicable zoning dos ict i e R- 20. High Density Residential - 20 40+ units tt applicable zoning districts ax R -20, and R-40. to 20 uni. ;k , to 'fie ! acre. Neighborhood Omrtercial - Areas of ax'N i ation of small ocamercial and peksonal service activities and related uites necessary to satisfy the daily shopping and related .needs of rear r residents. The applicable ' 7 ,oni ng district ' is Neighborhood Corner: cial (O-N). General t; i ial .. Refers .o areas for auto -oil .�... l.��'tteri relate c imlercial uses located along major ta icways. l: cable zoning district is 'General Ccamiecmial (C-G). Uinm erc ia1 leas deemed aariate for business professional offs and ''related uses' a agpl.c�ble � di stri ct is C on ie,ciai Pro fessional Central t y ta,risilles s Distri d +c�a . apppriate for �ui ed use devel9poent allo04* nsercYal off ice, eat" s higher der!si ty '; hwriegl h residential uses of r ,�.nitn� ri of 40 uni s ,pet to acre. The �atpli cable'' zoniing `districts a:irre, the ntt l Basic .strict (T and the Special District which limits �c�eside ntial uses to 12 units ��� a�i e r 4'1ra�l;�il4ti„��i''��l ? }i4 tli sZ E m CD us [I2,13ti INVoicATEraltrr ,' This chapter addresses Statewide Planning Goal #1 ''To ; develop a' involvement program that ensures the ,opportu r ty? for citizens to ' be .inval. all phases of the planning process." en in Tigard is ' maw well know;a for: its active citizen pa icapatiion program; primarily with the Nei A '.A ��t �� .. ��211?I91ZnR� r...��]..OnS. � '.L'!`i..�'f"oll� , file C ' and adoption of the C cerr� nsi`i�e Plan, ' thesr� 'orgmn iza-ions oontribUted time and energy developing Tigard s plan. Plan policies have been Prep? ared to preserve the coat nuLit 1 • of Ti � 'gird ' s active citizen involvement dam and try ensure that citizens - will continue to have access to information that enables to identfy , , and hate in the planning issues related to inple men ti on of the ive Plan. Additional information on this topic is ava habie in filhe "egray,,ehensi.ve Plan Report: Citizens Involvement." FINDINGS Throughout the dev�eloimt of the Tigard, C t hensis a Plan the City has actively sought the participation of Neighborhood, Planning Organizations and other citizens mss. The Neighborhood Planning Organizations and tire. conu a ttee for Citizen Involvement met on abasis , C !� Plan revision process. monthly °'�' Cehensive Continued citizen participation ii all as ects of land use planning helps to ensure that City r ' ,, s tjl gavn..rr�me�nt men �,�� -�„� �neE#:1S of T1ga�ead citizens. In order to partici to in land use planning decisions, citizens need to have access to information which enables them to becc e ` aware of and informed about planning ' issuw and City policies. It is essential that - this ' ' citizens - .sable form,, information be made available to all citizens aln an ���d land use education is i la mportant to pride and stimulate into in citizen participation prooeSs during all phases of planni �n the cta.z ng • 2.1.1 THE SHALL A IlJTAI A1J ONGO:LHG : CITIZEN Vl t, NT ; ZAM " 'Yr'W 4 • ASSURTd AT CITIZ NS iii BB P IKED .,AN o • rS1OI Attil PHASES OF '1HE PJ PFt`CF S., • 1l1PLE14ENTATION SIRATIMIES • The city shall period cally review notificatio n recui relents ari Methods t e e , if they adequately provide notice to' offer ea citizehs and r e v sI o hese eguirements and methods as neoessary. • order ghat improvement pro may be set 6x1 motion t0 make dive ified and economically viable core area. nti`Jes to econo �1� Vase of am -ass to I -5 and Hi4lway 217 serve, . as truce deve1lt in Tigard. s ar Tigard!' a pity to job College provides tY f • specialized training programs . to serve e ting, ye ca���ian� Hof � 5.1...2 THE 'y' '. wow 'WITH IMSHINGTOK OOTJ1fl AND ADJACFNT JURISDICTIONS TO DEV DP AN �C DEW: OX:MT 'PLAN ]] CORFORPTI* A 'LOCAL, ECt*I ' IC' DEVELOPMENT AND, ENHANCE THE S O THE CENTRAL BUSINESS SHALL IMPROVE '� ON C-'IT� R� HI(�i : DENShliY , .. Dingier AS TEE FOCAL POINT FOR ID, aimless, CI'fSIC, ANb) I FSIO °-� ? A 19=sla IcALLY VIABLE CORE ARE,A., 5.1.4 THE GITY SHALT'.` ENSURE 749.2 NEW CSC CAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVF.CDPMENT mate NOT EINCiArtai E. MT S THAT y q L' T i1s VL`1l I, ED miz.caittmcrAL OR INDUSIRAL USES. 5 1.5 THE CITY SWtLIj PROHIBIT RESIttriTIAL INDtprRIAL ZONING, DISTRICTS ':66,:teki tp +lENTARX RESIDFSITIAL DEvEtAPME4T ALL BE .PERmurtilb ABOVE THE,, ,FLEW .. DIS"�RIfaTk, AND ?ABOVE Tag SDOOND FZAC)R IN F7AOR TN THE CII�'�RAE BUSIIJ]ES.S �]!�. . SITY' OF' Pl�FESSEOr1A� DYS' `Fa�?RIICE 1�i',L� rA "� R-40 , DISI�RICfiS: ): DF4�CAPM�IT SHFiT.,L D'N II DO 5. CING B' PRIVATE D1E V PEAS '[N ITS SHALL OCINSIDER � To PROVIDE T�SC FACL`�I^Tt1E5:: 1.� THE C , OOORJ'INi�.t'IDN WI`i'i� MAILABLE SZ4 � '10 OCMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL, LAND DES A': ED ON x ' 1AP. „ • , cnVit FIREpArk8 AND tiviPLEKENT',A IPROVEMIENTS1.'pRoditml wacuic taisvaNk,',ION COUNTY AND THE APPIZCZELE SERVIECE OR WITH spiwice: D'ISTrattrIS 'Ilt) PROVIDE A COORDIWATED SYSTEM FOR raf;JVIDINO SEROICIM• 717.1.. Ell10bF2, UR8N SERVICES IN ACOCEIDMN'c',2 WITH THE OCIMPREHDISIVE PLAN 10 EXTIEtilT;OF ME CITY'S FINANCZUL icES,'IURCIES; USE TIM my,ITAL, ThiPROVEMENTIS 'PM AS A 24Y!AVIS FOR PROVIDDIG 113R \ORDERLY Gill AND ME WFICIENT USE OF IAND; EVEL13P A C..44PRE1ENSIVE MAN WITH CONSE.'li,RIVTICti BEING IVF1 10 TliE LEVEL AR) CAPACITY OF THE mcisriNG SERVICM;',AriD APT Ii3CATIONNL CIITMRI. A AS THE BASIS FICR MAYS DECISIONS ABour 1401;ER Ilt)C2dION FOR PUBLIC fAcTarirs: crr natzvRZIKARE-Ag A PRE.coibmci ,Po' DEVEtortertr AVM:4;4 trEVEZDPIGITT' COIN= ;iirrli Via" AdrrIt PUBLIC TATAT'13R; 2. PUBLIC SEWER &MU, BE _REQUIRED FOR NEW DEVF..LAFOIENT WITIEIN ITEM =.1 LINILESS ME PROPF:FrEY 3:NV1)LVED IS OVER 300 FEET 11Cti A SEWER AND 1qA,S IGTON I DI' DirARnizin Alvgi:IC72%1„ FOR A PRIVATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS (:)PAINED; AND 3. SI0iM 1)kkiNAGE. THE FACILITIES ARE: CAPABLE OF ADEZATELY SERVING ALL INTERVENING PROPOSED D �i oPMENT; AND DESIGNF4iTO CITY STANDARDS. c. ML NEW DEVELOPNIENT t;'TILITTES 10 SE PIA(530 UNDMMOUN). IlvIt)LEIvIENTAI'ION STRATMIEs As a part of the ongoing planning .1r113roliettieritts progL-ain; and a. The staging of facilities will be based on the akrailabili 4;. in jor ooa rn of the ozeinunity regar ling t~'arspo tat .an is BF rota 'and ice, .t.'' a livability , of. � d+,ential > areas aln � txe%s a a. ti on and trans, transportation reguix tints . develop a strategy to ,.vo :Im r!ov rents wit private sector inprovements to adli.eve use of ;the ]..united dollars available for road deVelc�poo�.nr 8.1. 2. THE �� � MANAGEMENT OF THE TRAN..rAT7t�T PLANNING *PROCIMS WITIM THE CM MID �1[7J ItlEIROPOIXIAN AREA 'CcE3 oxspERzaim wrIH MIER FEDERAL, S1 ATE, RMIONAL AND Mali JURISDICTIONS. S ?EET PIG HT -OF WAY CATS i THE STRi'3� IS . SUB ``� . . L�.t� IN EE DII7I C agglRUCnON OF ? ▪ T�3E I�E'VE�PEE� �fi�LLT .THE S�'F2E��Z'S C�.� -, AND SIDE IAIKS '10 CITfi TD DSW HI THE DEVEI P T ] IDIV?.DUAL vE /ErI PE RS PARI'XCIPATE IN THE V 1*)Jr OE .STING i • �' E%►AIE. GS '.TO THE F T� Tr OF 'TIM DEVEiA .0 S H'I'S, ' G`�1! ` . STS IMPACTS; TRANSIT gEOPso BUS TORNOUr Liktm A ., ....:j SS BE rtirDWD PROPOSED USE OF A TYPE mini .' Gr-r f.' RTES TRANSl1 itn3 (2) Site size. Varies (i) Gross leasable area. Varies B. ibezAtional Criteria (1) SpacitIg and 'Ibeati,on (a) The Ctimpreherisiiie Plan map fiice.F4, eica boundaries of courrnercial professional (b) The cairrnarciaL professional area is not residential districts on more than two 64ides. (a) The proposed use Cr expansion of an existing area Shall rot create traffic conge,stion or a ti.'aftific safety problett. Such determination shall be based on the street capacity, existin61 ,_ _ and projected traffic Volumes, the speed liteito tannber of turning movements arid the traffic generating characteristic's of the various types of uses. r: 3) :Site tharacter istids be a s> ? ' ri�c ch .can "a to present (a) The sib shall of projected . i ee ds: (b) The site shall hove. hi h visibi].� t (4) InPact AsPe spent configuration and characteristics shall be 3 t (a) The site �a the privacy of adjacent non coamnercia]. usez can be maintained. (b) It shall be possible to incorporate the .uni (Natures • into the site design development plan. (c) The associated Lit and activities " shall not interfe .. idsr.k l uses. with adjoining .�'����' ON IFS 1. a Ccumninity Develapnent ►xCiin4anc c shall: ood oomom+ercial district, a genera. c *i ereial a. i stu�de a neic orh and a c ial of sior.41. district, a hi- ay cci ca.al district, district area. . Require that: (1) The at be, subject to site design review.. (2) A Illird111211 of 15% landscaping be provided. (3) Necessary street inprovements be made prior to deve3.opment, . Prohibit single faini.ly residential uses in the nei oihQOd conmrcial and general ' commercial centers. L. Allow► for residential uses above the first story of cournercial uses only in the central businesses and commercial professional districts. of the corridor st tdy propusE for Pacific Highway (99W) b r the 2 .�s a the - Transportation and the Metropolitan District, . e Service Distr Oregon T.lepar��en` . �ofTram. the City shall: tiC patterns that have occurred alo Review the c�xcial development access zl a. ific Pacific Highway and look at maw to redu�. � points along ts a�,C o Highway; and m �. b. Develop ways conn solidate new commercial development into ccmnerciial J L centers rather than strip commercial areas. -1,1 4 the intent of the Industrial land use designation is to: 1. Pro Vide for the designation of suitable lands for industria: 2 P, oVide for economic gar Owth and deVelopment. iI� 84 use r f, ro • i'roteat existing and potential land., suitabl for industrial develoanen frav� encroachnent by rnxrindustrial f:a. i.nc npatible uses. 4. Pr.7avide 'laird for industrial use: by type to minimize urrounding developnent. 5 • fake advantage of existing transportation facilities. Industrial lands are classified • Heavy Zt,dust.ria? lands are areas intended to provide for mart facturirig processing and assembling activities. Uses within this classification are characterized by large buil dings and large storage 'a. ; and as having associated octet.' effects such as smoke, noi r se, odor, o visual pollution. 2 Light In lu s~trial Lands are areas intended to Provide for manufacturing, p ooess activities. lses within this classification icati � of size ofs scale a which makes them generally ccanpatible with other non andustrial uses and wii9. rh have no ' off -sits. effects. ` . of the city f industrial The, land use map designates sifi�c areas o ''tY ' o� industrial development. Over time, however, theft: may be a demand for new sites. Therefore, the following policy Will apply in making such decisions. pormiz 3 . , THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT: a. SITES FOR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DEVECOP,MreNT SHALL 13E (1) - SEPARATED D BY loPOGRAPHY ES'rABLtSHE) BUFF S, MANSPORFATION OR OTHER MN-RESIDENTIAL .AND USES Fib RESIDENTIALLY DEVELOPED ARES o (2) LOCATED IN AREAS HAVING RAIL SERVICE, AFIERIAL ©fir' COLLEX IOR ACCESS. • THE SITE SHATL BE OF A SIZE AM &KAP WHIM WAAL PIOVIDE SHORT AND LONG RANGE NEEDS 0 ` E rr EP. _DENIONSIIIATED*THAT 'ASSOCIATED 17FECTS ,WiLL Nap', INTERETRE WITH SUK9oUNDING Pia:UES. ALL (MIER APPLICABLE PLAN POISCP Industrial deirelcrent adjacent to existing or plarnied residential areas shall be conditioned to ensure that: . The specific proposed use will be dork_hlatii3le with adjacent uses. ma. The design of the facility and its 3:ue will not place vial or physical J:itirdens on the surralndirig areas. The olfiermtional, characteristics of the tvlility will b cabk-satible with surrounding uses, and includes cozielK:lerattion" of: (1) FlourS of operation; (2) Delivery and shippulg characteristics; (3) Noise; (4) Lighting; and (5) Other use characteristics. • The Comilititiriity Development Code shall include the fo3.1cK•zing provisions: a. A planned industrial park zoriiing dis-trict7. wriicti will include devel.oixaerit provisions Tritii,ch provide fort , 'I ' I ' ' '■ , ' ' ' ' ' , • , (1)L A basic street, and iitil.ip,r,Pittet-ri tiitilsizti will permit ,fl.e.1:r..ik)i•lity m , ., ,'',,,: ,,,, ' ,,„,,, • • . . ...,• ,... .,,, ..... . • , the size of industrial sites.,. , , , , 1, . . , . , 1, ,,,, • . ,, „ . ., - , ,,,„, , , . , , . „ , , . , • , ,. . (2 A circulation sysi-,:era that prol.ri),E1 direct access to arteti'.1tOr, • . , . , , ,,, collectors that will not channel traffic through reSideltial areaS,','I'L, ,,'''''',.•..„((.•: ',,.,',.' ... ',.'',, (1';,) An ante..rnal, ciiOile tioi sls telii hih c.e..)rl, tt, s , to adjoixmig„titt.e. ,,,,,,',; , '-'' ' ,' ,'' ,'•,,,,,'1,,. , . .' . I ' , , I , / II , , ., , ' ■ I '' , ' ' , ' I / , (4) A corioiet.e s#,, of pre7,,Ainposed'rest:rittiOns,- (0.56 dee‘••.'restrittiOns4: re8trietion. coVenants•..'etd.). 'that. are ,erforteab3A upon all occupanth of the indtistrial.:••par, including provision fOr.•,si,• , • - SiteAnaintenance.., um (5) Evidence of 0Dritinutrig iteinageirtilt, responsibilitilr to erkforite ...1 restrictions established under the original development plan. (6) Itecogrliti°n of the differing .ransr4Irtaadequh4c€:11-c,c,)11trArZ*411111egle-rlisidri f-or lid .,• loyee and se,....i-Vice vellidl. with transit ',Access. (7) A minim um ot' 25% of landscaping. ' ittd.NiYf'f(Idaw