The URL can be used to link to this page

CPA1990-00004POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. STATE OF ' OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) That I . am for^' the` That .I sorvel notice of the Tigard City Council. of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the ,foilowing named ger^ sons on the 1 of -9 U ; h . ;by mailing i�g tra ea� of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked' Exhibit B), said notice is hereto attached, and desposited'in the United States Mail on the ..post 4= Feepaid . Subscribed and sworn to before me t . s da 00100,149.49 + ` 11.,* 409 ai l' .e AdOCilh, rotary My: Commission E',. ire lied Notice/Delivered to Post Of is Subscribed and sworn to before me this GA day of Notary Public of Qre 0 My Commission I atPires Ir CITY OF TIG Washington County, ' Or n Pm = • Concerning Case Rta r �.a •wP.tl+ 4�..r. _ � r��tii��%�� « •• of • 0 of v_ner ♦ y kEYrll.i1 YYiiba mltlW� t tI�OiIIP _..... _..., , Name of A licant s, �niehe; l� n L • l ddra" ag!_ tirWrON9P2— 'lllrt-PlI- City St e- atl . Address of Property: i R d st ,t Tax Na and Lot Weis).: S % a ^1 mn® ■rye I .., • Ropiest: A re eat l o ti C preher.® c vr Plan Amendment to. change tho land use deei ateod from ��ght Industrial to General g g designation 9 ro•> 1 -L to 'C . te�rell and to �,aa�ai a the zoning n :Wa APProval with conditions Denial • N tica: Notice was Published in the newsPaPer, Posted at O ty Haa<1:k B'and mailed to: The applicant and ownex (s ) owner's of ra:e cord within the required dietaance a ..r Thy. affected Neighborhood Planning Qrganiaation Affeated g ®vazeatal a eticie a I. F mas►9. Pe c n s THE DECISION Was SIGI D ON nocats EFFRe ivE 1015190 The ado acted findings of fact, dedleion, and statTient O►f conditions Can obtalt.nea d from the Planning Depertmeht, Tigard City Nall, is iii 3 i3W Sox 23397, Tigard, ®fie goa � 97_�3 A review of this decision my be Obtaine41 by filing a no tide of lutes with ' the Or 'on Land U'ee Etcard; Of APPeols t NAj accord ig O the procec?!"rea 4 • cMgliTIoNs: 12 you have a g geeetieese ' .ease call zo T , ard Recorder at 63V-4171. b CPA9O 04.BKM r the applicant has'r tested:. a Comprehensive Plan, I j ` t to erc a .0 eneral,la ` K1 a one 'frOm I� (igbt dnsta al) �(i n erciaul General) on approximately 6.6 acres REAS the Planning s made recommendation of ad n for denial to Ti ard Planning CoMmission at a public hearing ® 10, 199 ;aid WHEREAS, AS, 'the '7C gar, i City C° held a pu 0644 on the proposed ges August 27, 1990 and September 17,.1990'tot revieWPlanningstari re o endatio Commission recommendation for approval,, and public testimony 1 iI 1ON 1: The proposal is consistent with re event criteria based °bpi the findings , and conclusions noted below. ,■ �mprehensive Plan Amen ieht.'CPA 90- one Change ZON 904 2 REQUEST: 1) Plan Map Amendment from ►igl t :Indus- to General Commercial 2) Zone Change from I. Industrial) strict to C- (General Commercial) district APPLICANT: Spieker Partners 5285 Meadow Road aE Lake Oswego, OR 97034 OAR: ': ing' Investments 3939 NW St. Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 ;! .Mackenzie/Saito : '; soc ates. tan Strut) 0 SW . Bancroft ,St. O. B0.6939 wand, OR 97201 -0039. Lower,., r arnd�Lo �3�,�`1'9L�11�. • N ®rth�''t�st quadrant of �� intersc�ctflon ®f L�at,e st�t�� 5 Boons Ferry , Road at' inte ectiion. withh S 72nd Avenue :and 13ridgepOrt Road. • 2S 1 13 �� ax Lot 17 D • RukgramiLliftEmatian annexed to the City of irigard in 1976, a: d has find ° g� property was ann s ass beeml� � The rOp � " �, . L since that three. No land use or development applications for this parcel have bean reviewed by the City since annexation° • Yii*-14.000 e subi ct acre site bounded on the west by SW 72nd, on t ie fast b• Vi do the north by the Oregon Business Parks and 'on 010 south by U developed right o'� -gray . ong Ltawer' B ions Ferry Road.. Surroundng uses and zoning titesigna tionns' are an industrial park zoned 1-L to the north; t, fo tor Wa hi ngton County quarry which -'is Zoned .1.4? (Industrial Park) Which is currently being filled in p .;p, ° possible _rr dw &o .. ntnent, Ys tip. �j..�.y..... we ° T - e, ark ° p d$ 1.1Z� i�C a✓�t, re �a�on for ossnble ��.�t� ,� � the ��i� of ss Lower Poones Road with . ty and �nde ns t® the south .acrd e ast° 8 . b ° ant d use alatnn• atnd I -� tea the �': . ns the pre dusnal velopannent on the west side of the 'freeway interchange, whereas commercial de.�, elo Mont is • ewy nnterch the predominant use oh tl`e east side. ▪ Site Int' _d,.on "rep ' al De The 6.6 acre undeveloped .Salta is generally flat arid IS slightly below tine grade of ruvdn subst the freeway thexeby p °. ° n,� axitial exp may t�a� '1"l9iere is a ... , rnsure tc� fee ... shnaher :decidn+�us stand oof, loge Douglas rrr t d,es un the ante along v tln sea ve trees and low -lying bush. The applicant requests a Plan Map a.tnendm :nut froth' ight Inds stria l to General Comercil and ZvnOChange from the L(. (Light ds al ons u g district m u t' the - (eiera l Co merci) • zoning district. The, applicant hasub aitted • +a o statement designatedt ,'• M r e f p ►sed,Anie ht tea Cho at . � 7C preh -tfl lain J[4 a ► ari `;on n : ,.. In additi.oin, thie� applicant. • • ORDINANCE NO. 9 O-- Page 2' oso has submitted a traffic study in tabular form. The traffic stun • withine the t.• summa nze r-^-+� vrp. aiesi tips would make the subject roe available. Although the 'propc�;��► �mt . � . � � �' P `�� for development of any of the, per tted or conditional, uses allowed the CMG zoning district, the appli�at's� y ,w and traffic study focus on use of this site for a cornb9ned hotel and retail center; Hotels and retail sales are peritted uses in the CIS zone and are not either permitted' or conditional uses in the present -L zo g designation 'applied to the property. The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and offers the follow in comments: �ry pq • •- ° A '� rill �, d id As mentioned in the applicant's submittal,. there are adequate storm F sanitary sewers in S.W. 72nd .Aveptie to serve the site. The Oregon State Higtiway Division, has reviewed the revised traffic study provided by the applidant and has agreed that traffic concems have been adequately addressed. The Engineering Divisions in agreement with the conension s of the Highway Division. The Oregon 4tatP Hi way'fi�ivision ori• ° y expressed c eerds regarding: the proposal. The applicant provided additional information to the Division and at the Planning Plan g Comxnissior� hearing, a representative from the ]division indicated What satisfacto short . g e solutions were available to aecon odate tone chased The Dn � ry, ��cnd on rangy " `�nsion lead no ob'ection to the proposal. this plan and �o � � The City of Durham has reviewed the proposal and has requested that every effort be made dur n development of p sible, in , colon . � g development f the, site to preserve' roumeut � � trees as pos or9 duality o� our e it t:, parts P P e the., air In additio Order to help resew shed. na, old bG l�rovnded ensure . � in. order to traffic • control�� shun, coordinates;' use of 72nd and Lower, Boones Ferry RDad,► The City Tualatin Planning Department revie ed tine proposal and 'offered eoininents regarding, the a PP licant s tr�ffi c an al y s s a P made io re con nodation regarding the • proposed Plan rte udug e t Zone haug e• Thalati ns regarding the ti n i ng for the ' � clue�tnvned the traffic analysis' assu�nptio future extension of DurhaYn Road t o Avenue a r d the a ratio n, turn Ioics at the %5 Lower Bou�es Ferry o ad nnterhair e • od�n o Tuala to i * questions the-Validity.. of assume \, iO rega r din g e, amoutt of tra [ is to the at. will iesult o c riveby The 04 'of Tualatin agrees,' with the. tr `s analysis' stateneat that thn intet4lan a and ; he surrounding r�adwa y s nd area regional issue. use charg e be a pp roved' he u ssLe ec d . . of Thalairn encourages the City oaf Tigar., ' y uupport future `freeway d d to actnvel s interchange improvement, projects in this area. OI INANCE 110. 90- Page 3 TT�iii;,e l3u lding Divis'to , °iTigard Water District; W hfin n` o t; Depart me at of nd Use and Tra�nsportati'An,-'General Telephone, and POE have reviewed the pribposal and hart isSued no ' comments or obleo: No other .tints have beep B� eived FINTIITNrIS AND CONCLUSIONS The ;;levant criteria ' in this case aye are 'Statewiwe : laiming Goals ' 1, . , , and Comprehensive Pbn Polici 2.1..1, 421, 4.3.1, 5.1,1, 7.1.2,7.2.x1, 7.4:4, 7.�. ,x:1.1, 81 and 122.1 ( ►cattonal' Criteria for the Generalf. Commercial' Use), and the change or ,mistake euasi-jutacial Plain. Map Amendment criteria of both the Comprehensive Plan and . ommumty Development Code. < applicable fill laarnce VVk�i'1 is 'nn co City Council concludes that the proposal s p Statewide Planning Goals biased upon the. following findings: I. Goal #1 (Citizen Involvement), is satisfied because, the City has adopted a citizen involvement program including review of ' all land use and development applications by neighblrhotd ` planning org tions: (NPOs). In 'addition,, all public notice re4 tiaeY �is rea�e to this applicati on oahave been satisfied. Baas a e � sty 2. Goal #2 (Land Use Planning) �as�y satisfied, because a �a�e Flan �. on applicable Staltewide ' lax .. i o des, pff� and Community Developm.etit Code mequhements to the review of this proposal. • Goal 9., ( Economy of the State;) is satisfied because the proposed redesignation would increse the City's inventory of developable commercial land although it would decrerse the inventory of developable industrial land. No neg. impact: einployinent in the City is fo:rseen in the proposed redesignation. Goal #12 (° ransportatiort) is satisfied because the proposed redeM ation will not adversely affect upon the remaining' traffic capacity of adjacent streets and the I� 5 interchange. This is ire thoroughly discussed under ;flan Policy 8.1.1 below. The City Council has d etermined that the proposed Plan Map Atnendm a nt / done Change +' is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan ari based u p on the findings below: I Plan Policy 2.. fls satisfied a e d be tau se Neighborhood rhood Pl anning Or g n ition #5 art surrounding property owners were. � ven notice of , p ubl,e hearings . related to the request request and !o their opportunity to coat ment On' the proposal. Plan Policy 4.2.1 will be satisfied through the dear lopment review and building permit processes at which time a development proposal for this site must be shown to comply with applicable Federal, State, avid regioal water quality requirements including preparation and iniplementat %ern of 10, non-point source pollution control plan in coanipliance with the Oregon If.nvironmental Quality ORDINANCE 1\1'0. 9Q`" `✓ -', .1.:. Page 4 w n miF orgy's tempos reds for tthe .ver Basin. ' e p oposed redesignation . does not " itself affect compliance wit th this plan o . 1 '- Flan Polity 4 3. • dlemented f hrou e development review process m •u " v • c uldui � lacemeut and landsca P in g . � reviewed with respect to ine n g:nois. he impacts of the eklve to pnn g use upon nenghbarite laud uses. Plan Policy 5.101 states tX at: The City shag promote 'activities aimed at the diversification of the economic opportunities available to Tigard residents with particular" emphasis placed on thy°, growth of the local job market;; This policy is considered im ortant to application r use the saib•ect ro e is located within the lar es pindustrial distract in the (t Additional �; � lor�a�i, �.� t as submitted for consideration at. tine Septen her 17, 1990 hearing relating to the impact of this proposal upon Policy 5.1.1. , The Council considered the following inforraaion to be relevant: a.' Thirty-two percent (241 acres) of the City's I -14/I-P zor; land is vacant . percent (128 acres) of the .. 29 � � City's, C-� l�and is or underutilized, while vacant or underutilized. b. Forty-seven percent (166 acres) of the 1-L/ 1 -P zoned and in the vicini ty of the site is vacant or underutilized. c The 6.6 acres represents 2.7 percent of the total vacant underutilized" 1- L/I-P land in the ;City and 5.1 percent ®f the total vacant /undea°utilz' ed. C- G land in the City. d A letter from John Ingle, Econor ist} indicates that the 1990 Metro Employment Density Study shows that retail commercial projects typi ly produce about 25 employees per acre, while industrial projects produce about 20 einp ioyeeu per are e Applying average wage rates to these etnploy]ent figures shows, that • projects generate about $201 per hour per acre, and endue trial commercial �o • acts enerate a p F projects about $210 per hour per acre, These findings are the basis for the City Council's conclusion that. the redesignat onof the subject property from Industrial to Commercial complies whit Policy 5.1.1 These findings indicate that ` industrial and cortiner�cial will `have about the same economic impact in terms of employment and income for Tigard residents. Further, this 6e6 acre parcel represents a small percentage of the total vacant /underutilized I -L /I -P land h the City (2.7 percent). The Council concludes that a redesiation of ORDINANCE NO, Page, cis property or conuric 0, fre vide lecono c benef to the cits ' o ,Ti d at Poses v pro M Ir G , i A. substantially similar; : manner ` as if the prc pe retained .its+ industi �' ;designation, and wil provide immediate . noricf ;.benefits Ias �I coinercii has i e ►ed undeveloped as an„industri, de�velopr�ellt rnasrgl�ch ass the�prope► r r' ��q ,per+ �g �g �j /9. ,q ,,� p ' ded because adequate a public an � ®11�Rn�r. l m3wEiy / ��im�g ,��y'�r"iy i� �°�r��,�✓ �, I. I, �, p r se vice capacities are available to serve.tatnre'development of this site. Extensio of necessary public facilities to serve t: 1e :site ate `the' re Ons developer'• The City of Tigard notifies pb bld public d private utility providers of pending dev elopment,.. applications. xi. . Plan Poll 8,1.1 states that: The City shall plan for a re ad efficient street a .d roadway system meets. current needs and ,anti dated future ggrowth and developmeatt This policy is of crit„icai importance in this case because of th. e evelopment W is occurring the vicinity, of the ' j:: ones Fe ►. Road: 'inttsehai ge. An initial traffic study, response to the proposed tinendcnents, indicated the existence of heavy traffic conditions a; the hinter ction.of� : ".' 72nd venue d S.W Bridgeport Road: ;dnce! the Oregon Department ofTransportation „(01 O ) initially expressed concern that the proposed tone change would exacrbate the existing 'conditions, ,tire 'tipp. t t sponsored additional' study ,of tr i c t ties of Tu $lath condlnons, in the area v�l>lcil involved the 0�C�'�', bra Me� �.�� c�j and Tigard, and Washington County. The study produced several alternatives, one which was a generally regarded as the hest' solution for the fixture inproven ent of the iiatersection of S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. Bridgeport: Road. The Couni.il finds tiiat: . The intersection of 722nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road, and of Bridgeport Road and f -5I .tlanip terminus both function at an, acceptable lord of when independently analyze. b The traffic problem evident at this location is the lack of adequate staclkiarlg; distance for left turns, which results in . traf ic,' failing to clear the intersection urin g the g'een si !AI al. • De ►elopment of the site under the, iii. zone Frill add about It P': % , ea yet p. • ` o (2 _ er`.Y nt of'pro°ected future total ) whir hoar trips to � seen ®n ,��, j� .. � . . _ to, the fli,,teT a ,. � i, ©ring gourd add about 161 trip (6. percent of fur r e to Mc►st of the site_,; elated tr e under C -6 zoning Would be a itin tea freeway and turning right 4!mn Bridgeport Road to 72nd''; Y reuu+ g t t utilizing a noncritical o egnet r t li x terms of mtex a tiori function an oRDIMANcE NC . 9 0- Page 6 �k1 southbound •: 72nd Avenue to eastbound Qtt.'„*, Ro westbound fidieiiait Road to southbound e s requirements aro.vittu saux6 :fee, ei 00041 comroem , development on the subjt property 01)0T has a 1991 project to re-stripe ath widen uiiibnes t� im rove the critical intersection lanes. asliiregton County has expressed a wilhnn eSs to work with other affected jurisdictions - and priiperty owners to effectiiate a 10,:,'..t.4erin impinyement to the intersection' of 72nd Avenue :and 'Bridgeport, Road. Tom Schwab of ODOT testified before the Planning commission that the applicant's studies and conclusiongwere accurate, and, specidtally, thattl-p-o- change to a commercial designation and subsequent development 'AroUld fiat impact the affected intersection significantly or differently than develOpment under the existing 1-1., zone. S a result, the Omen' is in concurrence with 011)Ors eondusion, relative to traffic issues. ased on these findings the City Council concludet'that fthere is a unique traffic condition in the area, where the critical intersection vitt .loiltinue‘to Tuntionat an acceptable level. The Council has found that because of these unusual ' conditions, site development under the. proposed CG zone will not have a ' significantly different impact on the level of service than if the site were developed under-the, present I-L , zone and that the traffic associated with the C-0 designation can be accommodated by the street sySte. Plan Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied as a coedit, on of approval of any future development of this site. Completion of necessary street improvements along the site's frontages would be required to be installed by tIR,1, fleveloper at the tune of development. The Engineming Division, the Oregon State&Iiigliway Divisfon, and the City of Tualatin would review any future development proposals for the site with regard to necessary road improvement • The lt)cational criteria for General Commercial uses specified in Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 12.2.ii are satr.isfied for the following reasons: The subject area no surrounde4. by iesidential del,r0lopmett on 'mot, than two sides. The closest residentially desig 'ted property, is in ej,;(!esi 611 , 1/ . , As disenssed above' under Statewide riatnting,,,Goal #12 and 'Plan Policy 81 1, the proposed conunerc?al redesignation will not ubstantially increase traffic on ,adjac-orit streets :and interse4ior4,0r lead, to an pnsatisfactoryleVel' , of serle„ Tlpts, conclusion based 'Avon 'Ole • • •••-, • • •. •. , • analyis and t.IIRI:)ils,t2VNePi Oro 9 Page 7 I , 1 I 1 ■ I /1 1 1 " • rrr „ r , , • ort of't ►e on ublic transportation is available across Lower B bones e site at the ,Tri -Met Park and 'Ride. The 6.6 . acre site is au adequate size to accommodate a vari ty of Us+ .. permitted in the C -G zoning di strictD • This site is hi Y vi hie from ado jing streets especially • D with adjacent i ses 1S'd t to ascertain without ComPatib ty of this site J an. actual `I'i ar ; Site al development proposal® However, t%e ty of - Devo :opment Review and Conditional Use review' processes are intended to rovide an opportunity for review of a potential development's Because the , , site aid only relationship with ad�r !ent existing uses. Y industrial property and major streets, compatibility issues regarding future development would be anticipated to minimal except With regard to traffic ancer. In order to approve quasi-judicial amendment to the Plan and zoning map!, the Pity ,s PP D evidence of a D, . �, . w s�ust also end that there �s evgd� , change ua the �e� bc�r�ood er +eo► , which afects: the parcel: Alternatively , the ty must find that there has been, a mistake or inconsistency with regard to the original designation of the parcel (ConiptebensiVe Plan, Volume 2, Policy 1.1.1, Implementation Strategy 2; Community Developraent Code/ Section 18.22.040(A)). The applicant's Naught asserts that there has been a Change the character the site because of The substantial amount of • surrounding tb . `• c r of the area. Burro interchange mmercial development t 4 has occurred within the City of Tu,` latin lathe � .. .... " in ��1�'a.. area thereby making the land uses in the area predominantly � , er i Adopted policies in the Tualatin Comprehensive Plan encourage cOmmerea development in the other three quadrant of this interchange. ��e qty �°� . , finds that the Tigard land use designation i ®n of Light Industrial ns: lnco nsite nt with 410 se City of Tualatin and that eircunstance• have cl �ad due to land use ., nations in Tualatin to commercial and the subsequent development of 'these ar d d esi other properties. erties• SECTION 2: e City Council concurs riti }he Pla ning i ommission's reco nen Than approves the request as illustrated on the Comprehensive Plan. Use Map and Zoning Map as set forth in Exhibit "A" (map). Attore Comprehensive Plan A!!'?ndmev Light Endustrial to General Connercia f Zone Change: 1 -L to 3939 NW ST. 4E1:, TIGAW) i OR '97223 ST A= OP 0 County of Waehingta:n city of Tigard City of •Tigaied A.a riarii u t Directo Tigard Plaeaiag ' Comoission Ygard Bearings offi car , Council A Copy (Public L dar ,ag Notice /notice Of Decision o.2 Mhieh is attached (Na_ eons at "the , a�ddroai? • >_° !r attached, list paxtorid exhibit •" on the 2-1 t � , day' off,. Laid notice . , um C DSC'S= ass � a at • wag b1�]letift boar -M ,,s. ..: *.a•�- . ed States Nail. ors the ', da, A � the � tiit postage prepaid. �a1 om i 1) ,st. r p< G. 11 °4/11,,Olt Ittl'.- pie. .al Person vita delivered to POST OFFICE a� T ITS MEETl, TIGARD CIVIC CI NG3 ;APPLICATION :. `90- 0004 /ZON 90 -0002 ILE TITLE Bingham /Spiek$r APPLICANT: Spioker Partners 5285 SW' Meadown Rd. Lake Obw,go, Oa 97034 R: Bingham Inv :�tment 3939 MI St. ideloni .Portland, OR r ' 7210 BEQUEST: CCMPREHEN ;IVK P.*,.: N AMENDMENT : , CPA 90' -00004 ZONE CH NC E ZON, 9; , 002 'BIND HAM /SO/EKER c�1PO. 95 A `reru ®at ' for approva3 af, a' C 3mpran diva plan A11lendiogiat to chanCl the.::, land use d®eir ation from , Light;, ,Induatri.i. to Glen ®ral' Coaaa`:erc ia3. ' 0: to change the ion "ins; deeiganatioel from 'I -L to `w, -G�. LOCATION: Between SW 72nd. Avenue and Interstate 5 and south of the. Buei�, aaa ParL (WCTX 281 13AD,; tax lot 1700) (See Map On Reverse Side) , THE PUBLIC HE .. .. IN � �� !!►CG:4RDANCE . a HEARING ON . z%IS MASTER i�IL�;, BE gQ►NDDGTED ,,, RULE OF CHAPTER 18432 OF THE COMMON/Ty D�``VELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF,,.r i- taLT.T. AA L AND A1,ILABLE' AT ADOPTED BY ` THE TIGARD ' CITY COUNCIL "CITY PRL'! DU SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. Aar PERSONS HAVING I5 MAT TER MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD, OR TESTIMO IY MAY HE SUBMITTED I ENTERED INTO TEA RECORD. FOR FUR':4HER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECOPDER, p ... CITY 13125 SW HALL BLVD. ,; VIG'6RS AT 639 ,,4171, TIGARD CITY l�Ai+h, 'ER oIAN STETS OF OREGON County of ,;Waahin+ 'City of •'Tigard, A1 on depose . and says IDAV,TIT° -of •,MAI Is. ping 14rist duly sworn %affirm, on oatl lease print) • That I am a he City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE IOF PMIC HEARING f'03t: • That I served NOTICE OF DEC',CS.ION FORS • City of Tigard Manning. Director ,Tigard Planning Commission aria Tigard ' He , Si s Officer Tig d ,City Council. A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Harked' Exhibit "A” ) lla■ mailed to each named pszr.ans ' at the a'Idre.s shown on the attached list marked ozhibit "g" on the day of �' .. 19"10 said notice NOT/CE ©f- DECISION as here oAsttaghed, was postmtd on an appropriate bulletin board on the day of „g and deposited in the ' United States 'Hail on the 19 postage prepaid. a�. 1:11:11-9aredtics/ yti a . err°.. dtiR ''• �tit�- hrr „�':,1a1� and eworniaf f irm to me on the da y .a® of, J ��d JENP� who delivered to POST OFFICE • .�' LRY 's I y Commission Sumo ibed and ewer n /a�.f f irmn to oil on t�►ie � . , .._.,.. • gay cg 19 a _�, y ., "may[ 41� '� ', ' ' 'V 4 �ITfr a�,. w ova yR ! kr",°�''..N t r1t DOT � :;' s g ,4�w i" 0.4 6 j�DiQ � t �ixio 6 lis of it PUBLIC! OP OREGON iavian Expires t ' `_ O T I C E O F PUBLIC HA.,_R I !_ a NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING 00101ISSIOlg, AT ITS MEET7NG ON TUESDAY, July 10 • 1990, AT 7=30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD FOLLOWING CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER APPLICATION: FILE NO.: CPA 90- 0004 /ZON 90- 0002 APO NO: FILE TITLE: Bingham /Spieker APPLICANT: Spieker Partners 5285 SW Meadows Rd. Lake Oswego, OR 97034 OWNER: Bingham Investment 3939 NW St. Helens Rd. Portland, OR 97210 REQUEST: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 10 -0004 ZONE CHANGE EON 90 -0002 ,,, request approval a Comprehensive BI1� SHAM /SPIEY{�ER NPO #5 A re esi fore a royal of Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Li4ht Industrial to General Commercial and to change the, zoning designation from I -L to C -G. `�� 2S1 13AP� tax lot 1700) h LOCATION: C 6 acres located between en SW 72n Avcnue and Interstate 5 and south of. the Oregon Business (WCTM Map On Reverse side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS HATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OR RULES RE RULES OF CHAPTER 10.32:.. OF THE COMMUNITY D AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL,. �, COUNCIL AND PROCSDURL� �D THE TIGARD CITY OF ,y..PTED BY PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30e SUBMITTED IN �1RITIr�$G THIS INTEREST IN TO BE ' I�AY ATTE�lD AND BE HEARD, OR TESTaMONY MAY BE MATTER ANY PERSONS VING i�A ENTERED INTO THE RECORD RAISE AN ISSUE IN 'ERSON OR RD OF THE HEARING. 1E'�IILURE T'C? RA BY LETTER PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE HE CRITERION FROH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS' DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. FOR FURTHER I THE DEPARTMENT AT 639 -4171, CITY HALL, 1312 5 SW PLEASE BLVD., ON YOUR TIGARD CI NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) # 5 • 9 =582 3 AYRPLRBO qt Hopkins PHONE 'NUMBER., 63 � N. Craig bkm /CPA90 -04. BKM Woo Fi MERIDIAN 2a Mv `, tiNSI" YVB 2 22r w STATE O1' OREGON County. of Waehincjton City of Tigard reing first duly Sworn /a'firm, on 'oath' °pose and say: (Please print) That I The City of Tigard, •Oregon.'' That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FORT That I nerved NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: city Of . Tigard Planning Director ✓: Tigard Planning Cooamiedion Tigard Hearings Officer Tiard City Council' A copy ` (Public Hearing s ^tice %Notice of, Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibi% "A ") was mailed to each ., named persons at the address Shown on ` the attached list marked exhibit "B" on the J1 day of tit 19 `�Z� , said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto attached, was Sao tell on an appropriate bulletin board on the day of �. 19 J and deposited in. the United States Mail on the day of , 19,x, postage prepaid° ed and sworn/af firm to me on the 1A1 poet, '4 .,tt. IT�n3�Cdi� 4�% !: ti f. : 6 , v a, j(j , ,; OOW,,a r� ,y, riiiii,iii woo' bkm /AFFIDA� . BKM; * r Y PUBL C OF 0 CON My C iee�ton Exp . es: `. . +-` _ I). ti d E NOTICE Q F P U B L I C N 8 1�, R I N G N0TI0E I8 HEREBY GIVEN THAI' THE TIGARD PLANNING COMICESsiOw. AT ITS MEETING ON TUESDAY, x_g, 1990► AT 7:30, PM, IN THE TOWN HALL THE TIGARD CIVI.: CY.HTER, . I ION: 1;12 5 8W HALL BLVD o , TIGIITtD OREGON, WILL CONSIDER FOLLOWING APPL':�CA FILE NO.: CPA 90-0004/EON 90 -0002 FILE TITLE: Hingham /Spiekez APPLICANT :_ pLeker Partners 5285' SW Meadows Rd, Lake Oswego, OR 97034 NP0 NO: 5 OWNER: Bingham Investment 3939 NW St. Helene Rd. Portland,' OR 97210 REQUEST: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 90 -0004 ZONE _CHANGE :ON 90-0002 BING request a fbr approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment c Ohange the land use designation from Light Industrial to Ge.3ra change zoning 1 C�namercia�]. and to ; chars a the �o designation frc !-1 to C -G. LOCATION: Between SW 72nd Avenue and interstate 5 and south of the ores; on Buei eee' Park (WCTM 2S1 13AD,, tax lot 1700) (See Map on Reverse side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON T1 IS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18,3` 2 THIS' RULES OF C OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND R ULES , OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD 3 OF PERK PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 1Ie AND Ii►. .30 ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST ; IN THIS LABLE AT .CITY L► OR R PROCE C�CTY COUNC VAI MA, HEARD, OR WHITING TO BE TIER MAY ATTEND AND BE TRSTI�ONL' MAX MAY BE SUUM] I'ED IN Ti�TRI'�' ErTERBo Ta-v FAIi��uNs TO RAISE AN ISSUE , IN PERSON (ER BY LETTER PRECLUDE13 AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION , F' Tom, COMMUNITY DEVELOPN1 NT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS 'DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. FOR FURTHER INFOR:tATIoN PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT CE9- -4171, Y BALL, HBORHOOD PLANNING TIGARD CITY .. , � PL1�I� TI 1312': SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT YOUR NEI4 ORGANISATION (NPO) �• , Pi36�i+iE ER�t 5. ChAIP.PRIRr' N: Cra3 g ._Hopkins b /CPA90- 04.BKM v.! '1WF/DitVIT ,Okr i■!CATIC,; OF OREGON of Washington , ) es.: .., ,, ,, ,• izt Tigard , , I i beirg , first duly solorniaf,firas, on oath depose and siyi, (Please print , :Chat I- m a 4/1_, c,3-v-tta ......--- , for The City Of Tigard, Cirmgon. , , That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC ESIIRING 470R: That I served NOTICE OP DECIIIION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard 1?liaTining'Commilsion' Tigard Rear.iilgs Officer 1"Tigetrd City Cluncil A copy (Public' Hearin c; ilotice/Nctice of Decision) cl;t whiCli i� attached i'abfartad Exhibit "A") was mailed to en°13, named per one at Vie address shown the attached list marked exhibit' "0" On the . ..\ 19 -ra sail* notice NOTICE OF DECISION as heieto,atteched, wei,{ 'Erol.,tited on an aZiPrOPriate bulletin board on the dfxy of 19 ; and depoaied in the $th'ilited States Nail on the 3?*; of , to postage prepaid. ' ■ , Signature PC eon who del vored t6 POST oPPICIJ Subocreibed td swortsia.ffirm to me oil the 19 .., Person who p111;ied on Bulletin 'Board (For Decision (JrIly) 6,...vtia . ... „,.,...........,.......,......... '''''.''''''' '' '' 714'44 NOT'ARIf.,' i!i-21t..itlid.''' ol,. i','‘''.,A€0"ott -• - ,, , , ' • - - , '1,44 R ),:;,, AS ''' .1-iiiOn.-HiOirett ,,, ,,, y .,,,...,. .,. , ,.., '• „ ,';,... .,,i,„: ., . „ ' It 1°. • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN , THAT THE . TIGARD CITY C OURCIL, ' A ' ITS 3 STING ON W NDAY,' April 23. ,1j,�,�Q, AT 'PR, IN THE •TOWN ` HALL Or' THE ,TIG ARD CIVIC ,cntra7rit, 13125 3W HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER TRW FOLLOWING APPLICATION': • PILE NO.: CPA 90- 0004/ZON 90 -.0102 NPO NO: ' 5 PILE ` TI'S : Singh am/ Spieker PLICANT Spieker Partners 5285 SW Meadows Rd. Lake . Oswego, OR 97034 REQUEST: LOCATION: aii'NER: ' Bingham Invi'io Ot t 3939 NW St. Helene R Portland, OR 97210 cOMM:4REHENSi'VS PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 90 -0004 ZONE CHANGE ZON 90 -0002 BIVG I /SPTERERi NPO 415 A request for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment nr from Light to cha. �e the land � ue ®' deAigna�tioh Industrial to General rcial and to change' the zoning designations from I -L to C O Between SW 72 d, , te,enue and Iinte, state 5 and south. of the Oren Business Park (WCTM 281 13A ,i, tax lot 1700) (See Map On Reverse Side) its TIC PUBLIC NEARING ON THIS MMTER STILL BE CONDUCTED INd,ACcoE401,NcE WITH `Tim. ,AND RULES OF Rt1B+E8 UR RULES, D THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT (CITY ' TiR .16+.32 OP' THE COMMUNITY DBVEL�SPICENT CODE _...t.3.y OR A�,,.��D BY T . . PROCEDT: dET FORTH IN `CH IPTLR 18.30. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTE,'ZEST . IN , THIS, MATTER MAY ATTEND AND DE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY RE SUBMITTED.IN,'WRITING TO BE ELATE IED IN$ THE RECORD. "+R PLANNING TMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORD$Tr', �. I1$Pl►.n. AT 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, IGAR), OREGO 97223. 13125 SW 1� .... 13 BLVDa r T bkpt /CPA90- 04.8 FINDLAY, ' STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard I ( e) `"r IN , bein g first duly Sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print). That I am a e✓ \ �`.4A .,a for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NUTICE OF DECISION FOR: , of Planui,ng Director L.,'"-ligard Planning Commissio n Tigard Hearings officer ;Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notices of Decision)' of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each mimed' persons at the address shown on the attached list marked exhibit '°B" on the \--144"-c day of l9 Ct -, said notice N o he.ret9 attached, was posted on an appropriate y ,!!�V bulletin board on�the D►�� day aef ` .,,. 19 _; and �depos ted in the United States Hail on the Zia' dal' of , i9 postage prepaid.:' Signature Person who posted on Bulletin Board (For Dec,teion Only) erson who delivered to POST OFFICE ` `) Sub�crib'zd and firm to me on the day of L d • NOTICE OF P_UBL I C at,B 13tIII..�Q &TOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT TIM TIGARD PLANNING O0 ]iISS. ON, AT ITS MEETING ON TUESDAY, 'April 3 1990, AT 7 :30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TiG��w), CIVIC' CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD . , TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: CPA 9000004 /ZON' 90-0002 NPO oa 5 FILE TITLE: Bingham /Spieker APPLICANT: Spieker Partnere 5285 SW Meadows Rd. Lake Oewegoe OR 97034 OWNER: Bingha* Investment 3939 !NW St. Helens ltd. PortlAnd, OR 97210 REQUEST: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPI 10 -0004 BONE CHANGE ZON 90 -0002 3INGHIAM /SPIE ER NPO #5 A reque:..4;' . for approval of , a Comprehensive g n Plan Amendment from Light endm®nt to change the. 1�,,�d use deal tat Industrial to General Commercial and to change the zoning designation from I -L to C -G. LOCATION: Between SW 72n1, Avenue and Interstate 5 and @oath o f the Oregon Bvainoeel Park (�TCTM -281 13AD, tax lot 1700) (See Map On Reverse Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN AC RDANCE'`WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 15.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CC�UNt�IL AND AVAILABLE CODE CITY' HALL, OR PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY PERSONS HAYING INTEREST IN FORTPROCEDURE S MAER MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD, on TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE D INTO THE RECORD OF THE HEARING. ? Sim IN PERSON AR; ENTERED r FAILURE �ECIF`x' MBE CRITERION FROM TH'�' 'LSE AN ISSUE APPEAL, .. . REC 'ED L'ATwQRE TO S AT WHICH LETTER PRLCLUDE�I� T CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A A COMMENT IS Dx AN APPS,�AL AND COMMUNITY 'u1EY1EL�APMBN PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. FOR 1 PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 6 39 -41 TIGARD CITY HALL QD VDR CONTACT YOUR NE ,:G H'CRHOOD 'PLANNING G ORGANIZATION (NPO) #` • Crain Hopkins► PH . .. , ,.. $Ra' ,.. 539 -583 C�IRPi>�RSON: ,, O ,�1E NUI�.i� .�.............. . , . bkin/CPA90 -04 . BE M PACIFIC I , i• 1,■••■41.41A 4610,0,4i, • '„ , CITY of TIGARD, 13;1.25' SW Tall, PO 3sor 23397 Tigard, `Oregon 97.223 - (503) 631-4171 RECEIPT No. d 7 APPYICA :CON ACCEPTED Applitition elements fu :5ittP4 Application f Ve ': ? ;E) 'Owner° a s# gnat ure/written .- authorization C) Applicant's sb:aaement (Fpre°4apg check, list) y' 41ing .fee'( Additional information for Compre- PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION�'.tiv,. i. 1.42i TAX ;NAP AND TAX LOT N0. . 4 27` . 7o 2,r Q SITE, SIZEt'2 PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDE .* $,ANC kboleA. CITY • ZIP APPLICANT* 5 A TO ADDRESS S-1- 23.x7 S tv 64i .�?�ws" /Lt7 .PHONE P 3, CITY , . ��"„ e -� 2I 7 *When the olner ' and the applicant are different people, the a ..plicant must be the ;.purchaser of record or a leases; in possession with Written authorization from the owner or an agent. of; the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the apace provided on Page two or submit a written authorization with this application.' The owners of record of the subject property request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (if applicable) from 1.0'USTdd,IYC to tic and a Zone Change from -L to �+.. .:: ... ...:.. OR The applicant requests an amendment to the ` ;X following sections of the Comprehensive Pla ar:' or 'Comm. nit' Development Code lap indicating Ipropert'', location (pre -a • List, 0 Prof t add i sses w thi ) ,Assessor° s Asap f) Title, transfer feet To' have a = complete': app To, attached:: in forma. l lcan If.. t�:he appliea`ion isc granted, the app granted' in ` accordance, with the termo ancii subject limitations, of the approval ;. A!1 o J attachments, pplicants ; s Application, ' ma false. lot left above statements and tine atatemi.nxs in the and exhibits 'transmitted -herewi f iih, are, true ; acknowledge that : any peranit f issued, based : on' th he revoked if it l is . founds tha 'any such statements— ar The applicant ;has read, the entire, Intents o !► the policies" and criteria, and understands the or denying' the application. ;. DATED this day of SIGNATURES of each ow.zer eg. husband` and wife t application,' r.; tuiremcnts for LANS ( M UT PLANNil ;u * ND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MACKENZIE /SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 0690 S,W, BANCROFT STREET • P.O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 972010039 (503) 224 -9570 FAX (503) 228.1295 ,.6..,,,,,,,;,..:,!.,,,,,, - - 111ING`k J do. • e s gigard Planning Departmen s CPA 90-0004/ZON 90-0,P02 BINGHAM /SPIR A request for ,P E approval Comprehensive ,Plan Amendment to change the land use deaignati.on from. (Light Industrial) to C -0 (General, Cc m erc j.a11 and to .chan a the zoning desination from I-L to 0-3. Z9NE a Y L (Light gnlustrial ) i,oC. t T = N , s. ..' Between SW 72nd Avenue and Intersta "te , S and south of the Oregon:, Business Park (WC'M 251 13AD, tax lot 17001 Attached ins the ° Site Plan amd applicant •'s `s atemsn : for your review. Fro information 'supplied, "bY various dopartnwnt,ti and' agencies and fres► ether'. information available to our' ' .,'rope;yrt aid recoianenda*.ion' { will lie Prepared and a decision Will be rendered on "the 'proposal in 'the rn�iar; 'future. If you With .to comment on this ,appl.tcation, 'we your coreento 1990e You' may use the space provided -attach°-, a separate letier to oxaanents . Y f wou are na le to n ®none by thy , eve, d tee ,lease r�rtura your c .ter. 6..�. p phone 'this staff contact noted below; wit *i your,, Ooc nente and confirm your coimnents in writing as soon as possible. Yf ,you hale : any questions r'eqan din this matter, contact the Tigard 'Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 1.3.2 ' 3W : Hall 1Blvd. , Tigard, OR 97223. P 1ONZ ,639- 4171, STAFF CONTACCT s PLEASE CHECK THE , FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT AtTL) s We ; have reVieiti the " proposal and Have no objections to it. ...err.. , �u ammo Please contact dpi azr office. !Please refer to ° the enclosed, l 'tter Written Comments ,_... —.. .�... Name of Person commenting: Phone Number: bltr /CF ►90- 04.13NM NOTIFICATION LIST Val ALL APPLIa TIONS 2 t °topiea • CITY DEPARTMENTS Buildin g Fa Ins ritor Brad R. / ..�` ity Recorder' Engineering /Ga4ry A. ▪ SPECIAL DISTRICTS Fire District (Pick -uo box bldg.) L Tigard W.D. 81)41 SW Commercial Tigard, OR. 97223 Metzger W.1?. 6501 SW; Taylors Ferry R.L. Tigard, OR 97223 . AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. 150 N First': Hil ro„ OR 97124 rent Currie Kevin Martin Joann Rice Scott Ring Fred Eberle Mike Borreson City of Beaverton % Hendryx PO Box 475 -.475E SW Griffith 9eaverton, OR 57076 State Highway DivieiOn Lee Gunderson PO Box r 65 Beaverton, OR 97075 7. SPECIAL AGENCIES ___e"-General Telephone Mike McSherry /Beaverton 4155 6r4 Ceda ' Hills Blvd. 0 97005 Olsen 2 46C SW Main 97223 Northwest Natural. Gas Ronald Polvi PE, PIZ 220 NW Second Ave. 9ortland, OR 97209 VCI Ceblevision of Oregon, 3500 SW Bona 1)1/:14'.41':a, b 47Z01 CPO No.' Q _ Parke & Recreation. Board Police Other School Diet. No. 48 ( Beaverton) Joy; Pahl PO Box 200 Beavertotlq on 97075 " School Di at. tio. • 23J ,(Tigard) 13137 SW i Pao( .tic Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 • pC. t. c Boundary. Commission 320 SW SL airk , .Room 530 Billeboro, OR 97124 METRO 2000 SW lot Ave. Portland, OR 972014398 11 o Other �••rw t Portland Gel .. Brian Mriore Portland Genera, Blectrio. 14655 SW Old, Scholia Ferx Beaverton, R 97007', Metropolitan Area Gosemitnicatione Harlan :. . k 41.n paid; technology +C mi 'ter 1815, W 169th, Place,;, S -6020 Beaverton, OR 9700bp rid orthwest 0 ; eouthera 'Pacific TiaaPPortationill' cmprny Duane Id. Forney, PLS ' 800 NW *filth Avenue, 324, illnion.,,Station Portland,' OR 9/209 m CS isdi.'- Lon F T Date Date 2roposaal was '1'ac+av ide(1 to DWD _F AILY :24,, s1i 'Type ref Adopted Action Cheep all thatpl > , Comprehensive X Plan Amendment Please coaplete . (A) for text amen A. �Y of Adopted Action (A brief' descir� i, P`t�Lon 'is ' adequate. highly technical terms and zone Code, abb,cavl9itionS s please',do "see. attached."): lation: Aimenatden Descr.lbe Now the Adopted Amendmsnt "bifferc from the .3 eoposi tl ,(If it is same, write "Same." If it was not; proposed, write NIA. ") 'j If the Action Amends the a Flan or Zone , Map, Provide the Following l'n 'ot*tti for Each Area Which was Changed Orovide a separate sheet for each area. Multiple sheets can be submitted as a singlet adoption action. Please include street. , address whenever' possible'. Do not notr., use , tax lot number alone.) 1" Previo!:is' Plan- De.signAtion:: Previous Zone: T-T. (LIGHT INDUS AL L_::_. , Does this change Include a Goal Exception? , Yet For Residential. changes ` Please" Units Per Net Acre ew '�ertsi■ty A Yf Notice of P;°1 12-a Please Indicate Why= vas Statewide Planning Goals Emergency CircuinStaflCe Required Expedited .Review ru D. are;; inapplicable or to st stateside Coals Which Nay Apply e `'Pina3 Nearing,' cfea.'� ant rernt or .Eo+ca1 dps'cia1 Service Lint any State or Federal Age�n the Adoption: t, Districts ;�3.c3� say be ' Interested in or aePe �'Y' Cities of- Tug la!-.� n r ��'' -; D ,sect Questions and Cc lIe tic To: Jerry 4ffSr,.. ( pho3e) 5 50116 i7► Box 2��" a�7�� Seem* To: Departecnt Of !And Conservation' and DeveloPeent 1175 C trt StrKtet, N. S Salemd Oregon!, 97310 -0590 One (1) Copy OS the A& pted Action► Attach. ,... 3) C.op�iee of t - 1/2 �� 11 loaa aadi�yr three. �. r tie this than 8 1/2 by • 1;arge�. aches eou►nd Materials �d I!laps I i f this form are needed: *lease contact the DECD' Q£fice at NOTE: If more copies o chipl nice t� provide notice 373 0050, or this farm may be gr r` i'ai1 P ' .. cased on een Pape app eal perti°d e Appeals ma y be filed Withi n 21 1 days doa f s t hoe f tdhain t e e a antc ht- e i opn r opocsomai il nig s of an ade P ad 151 an or1 and use regulation amen went reftult s Gctension cf 'the,: al g Y **ailed to DtCD• Statutes, regw�.re nia lira within (Sept OAR 660-18-.040). * *' FOP Drier) ICI.tstitt,A 0 Del) File Number <pa >adoptfortt► 1%likrIB9C OF CrABB ' ac. NV quadrant of I-5/Lower BoonesFry. interchange ri? Reviewed by CC 8/13/90 1, Major ssues ,:.s TRAFFIC IFIPACT and POLICY 5.14,1 CC requested add,l. info. re: XNDUSTRThL and C0104111(aIAL WU) BA in terms of: COSCO - '86 PUBLIC STOEUMB - 88 icontraxy to policy due to iraff TUALATIN/TIGAIRD IMPIXIMAT/NO .PLBN rIAL ., w PEI • prove .pity ,A Approve' . Loaves' and " s , ova .Che n tes to ,Appr 9 nv(tes�s Tishes' !Seri 'i kXnagc ent . OM oi~fon ounc'lo • asten, secon ded r^ the Consent Ag. PAP. - `.enda 10 This mo'tioo passea, . b= a 1�l� . ,. 7 �e ,�n'C ,u 5hu w # A rK x . k w:rr1 {� y 1H�^L,1 Y �,W^'viVw,u',ak �x p , w ,¢kwt i r w #L� �n "'�f .� rs , i r F:.., �l i CC tid'tF w r`w9wntil" G ,LC d�ww'N' < t w..eJt �. } it. six p i� �f .:..,. '1tf ya-s w weir r, n 0. . i'�'7�� si_0 i - m 1 r 1 • ^" R a'r v45" � v �, i � d + h a C):!,, Y fS '� �ii�„�) i i' F ' 1 J blo �' S 4'4 i �r. anon 3t viewed the above, applic. n. .. st �,a�� . e �it� Council r�,y t Augu designation from '*4.4h t0 c efige ' the ., Comprehnnci.va Plan �s gone �d n ' froion .from Xndusti �a1 to General. Cciaiu'o vial. W and th d ,• Lght `Xndostrial) to.; C--G (General Comne�ccial)' for a ro� �, erty ';-located on, the noit'th'west ' quadrant of the 1 -5 /Lower b t ti ' The Council indicated that' � t Boone ��r�cy Ro�td� nterc.aanc�e'r, , wished to see.' additional ,tr►a'cor nation ' regarding the. prese 4t s iCuatiOn for ccamerc ial and fdustrial landd and;e.. with n_ of the city. the City ,and, the southeast section a. MayOr advised that the public hearing was continued from August 13 , 1990. '4.' Senior Planner Liden IrevitiVied the application 'before Council. St aff prepared additional info eguestk %d by` Council at the. August 13, 1990 neeting) for Written material w filed With,, '`h ie Council reufew. �s n (see packet :- 'iterial fOr Council for t ns iderat o ` . their co this meeting). Staff continued to recommend denial of the proposal con cerns v� citing with decreasing amelints of land\ available for industrial development. " J unanimous vo me , Agreemen ensation Packag E �y C'oui�c lor a e ;of Count. ti resen' S. Hathawa r ' 1 rtland� OR 97204 • Gregory y 1.2 M Morrison, Po testified as le gal couns,'tel, for the , applicant. a Comprehensive Plan Policies and Mr. ` 'Hathaway , addre.,r8cd � ed that thaway argu Planning � gva�Q �Ir. . Ha. � � that al• lowing, p owing , t nt , rovide economic he app�.ica proceed wou . for hat pp unifies -; or the citizens .of ,Tigard � d� as �oned��as O ort !,td not develo e the • reason this ;property .�..w � p the' because the industrial itonig did not represent the highest and best He urged ,Counci • use+. 1 t0 consider request on its own unique merits. r, Traffic flow, vehicular" access, and orientation or ti property was discussed. Mr. Hathaway state mmetcii zoninI would be better. ;, for this area beca'us a a commercial ';business would be spread out during the "',da CIT' COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -- SEPTEMBER 1' ,., 1990 Jf ��r r F= c': kearinc was ca�Ca si Motion by Councilor Schway, Kai ten, to approve the.' .applican Comprr hensf ve Plan`` and Zone' t ; sub jeot' ,., property, from fight 't Commercia':l use. +'. sewn us es tr: COUno' nld`e esgna, t0 ,Genet„ e motion r, *as approved by a,,, u(nanimous voice .off �ounci esent. Council comments included the fo Llow ng • The area had not developed :c light:' Indus \`r�.a property all ;around') ad develo us :, • There was agreement with the a iica'!t's arg a nt that this property was suited ° More for commercial use because of location'" within the' transportation network and characten-istics of abutting proper.ties. • Development in the area has .:led to a, change circumstances since 1983 when the. light industrial designation was assigned. • This property was unique and this decision should not be fconstrued as precedent g etting. " Council requezted the applicant; malc 'very effort uto save zits many of the trees as possible. NON '' AREDA. , ITEMa BUaL n =Nay UsE goLIcY a. City Administra for Refill y and AdmlAistrative Services Manager Edin reviewed a proposed ;,Buicding Use Policy for the Senior Center. There was discussion on the `p �. r some functions . cil` re ire�aent of a dz os�a fee fo Cou�n consensus, was ror the City Administratorto determine ?qk *ether am lif ied sound s y stems would be allowed or if; a ded � ' � case -by- case bas3.s. ' osit fee would be re. fired Derr a St t th regard to usage of the Senior C nt r for Council ®con i erati n City fall Building'' Use Policy was also discussed.. There is;, a growing need for meeting' rooms in the community.` Council reviewed whether or not I it .would b. ta` good idea to limit the tv es of . . r.L .. p g City Hall e a P, mexily usa a in government meetings once the Senior Center rooms ' . are available. Staff will prepare draft wording for `Council consideration. NAME' CHANGE a. Notion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded b Counc'i or o change the name of the "Civic Center" tea !'j.t fasten t Hall. err erry COUNCIL MEETING MIN'UT'ES == ' SEPTEMBER i 7 , ; 99 ATTEST s,4,100q0.0,8 hiler '4'01 'eh' • 0,r,-111r...-ars .74,0$ 'to■ --'44``V"( ` It is my understand'irig these findings will be included in the Planning Commission packets for the September 17 tmeting. If you have any questions: please .1,et me kiao‘,i. °Thank yu , • for your assistance. 5/0SH/Au9l1 31137-00100 CC tgitel1C1 : Mr. Jim Eddy, SPieker art ers Enclosures GS}IllIct Mr. Stu 13ingh.9117., Mr. IL,Ans Stout Mr. !Ed ii4u,=41)111,, Cce.sitinturiity i)eve16,11Men Mr. Keith L.t.derli Planning Director Mr. Tim ltairdis, City Attorney Inc= PAIITN HAN IFirESTmEhlTs 6 Mackenzie/Saito Associate4 A Request For &pproa1 of a Compiehen\sive Plan to Change the 183.ght In4:11.1Eitrial. to General Comaterci.al and, to Change ,) the Zoning 13es14.gnation From ) I-L (Light Ilidustri,a1) to„ ) C-G (General Cos=eici,a1);',* Amendment Land Use Desigitation From Thiti',:tequ'e.Oit',is to aniend.',the City of Tigard Comprehensive,::„,',,' ' ', ) ■ . ' ,. ■ j , , ' , . , , r I ' , , , , , , n , ,, h , : , , : „ , , . Plan from Light .IiiduStria3. t&,..L,General ,CoMmerCial', and the ,City's. '., Zoning 'Map' fro* l'...1, , (Light , IndOpt,tial) ' to CG ,fl(General, commerciail ibi,' a 6 .6 acre Pa r 101 of.Hpr,03 er, ty .,a, , t,„S. i. 72 1d 4Venle near S.W., .. • '. . '' .: , '' ... ' ' , ' , , ,, ' , n , . , , , , , , ' , ' ' , I• , ' , ' , ,' ' ' ' ' ', ' , , 'I , I , ‘ , n ,n I n, ' ' , , ' . , , : n r ', n n . ' 'I ' ' '' ■ ' . , I , ' , I , n . , ,, , , , t , Lower, .Booiles Ferry ' Road. .The, property : it It:lesCribed'.:, :AS „lia# ' ,t::.1170,0,- , . , 1,•, ,,.. on AsseStitr'S Map 2S113A1)..,,: , , , I ■ -. TI‘e City Planning CciitImiss'ion held a hearirlg on thee requests at its meeting of July 10, 1990. ikfter receiving testimony an deliberating on this matter, the Planning ComMission vol,:ed to recommend to the (ty Council approval of these IrequeElts. The Planning Commission recommendation for approval clame before the City Council for hearing at its 'fleeting of August 13, 1990. The City Staff advised the Council that it had concluded that the kpplicant had demonstrated, collApla.atice with ail tk.'t the applicable legal criteria justifying the P1ai and one ange requet:ita 4, except for Calaprehensive Plan Policy 5.1.3 (Economic PROPOSED FINDINGS r� g SEPTEMBER 1/0 1990 HEARING Cr i e sification) , ,a ,� The Staff took :the` position r ouncii1 would. have to determine ,whet,her ,the change` `'in laid ee1gnatioi from industrial to commekc�.al for this pa,rt3 cu iv iersifed the economic o Ortunitles a PP parcel ,o; P � i Proper ty e - resid`ents� o, J =:ki ,"'oV -Tigar The City Council continued this matter o'ilv,. ai, al s meet info on September 1', 199.0 . to allow the staff and . Applicant to present additional information on existing commercial: and industrial land in the. City of Tigard, available leasable commercial and industrial1 space, emP►loyment and wage c nera °.ion:.. for . i.ndustrial . arrd-commercial development, and the history of plqmningr;ecisions in the area o the subject pat el. In ;conjunction with thy; Staff, the A rplicant submitted to tlrie City Council the information requested regarding the PrOposed Plan and Zone Change requests and testif itd how this information demonstrated that Proposed requests are consistent with the eCOrcmlc diver$ific�'.aon polacy of the City (Comp 'ehensiv�,� Plan Polir „y a.1.1) The Applicant also Presented to t he at s Council il` r o 6 e d findin s demonstrating ac l�n t the C it economic diver`- s i f is ?r,t ion policy 5.1.1. Aa so,r_; as . a. Part.. oftY ,these., _proposed find° ngs, the Applicant adddres ed Stakew1de 'Planning, Coal 12 (Transpor- tation) and Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.1 (Transportat,ion, H p.... p strat�ng .hat ��he ro osed . -..' . the ur ose of demon p p � redESsgnatio�� not negatively imr.ac ` ;t t'e near =® �t!'� and traffic cii.culati pattern in the area Although , the Ci:ty Staff and the Planning Commis ion have �cN�nc uc�.ed that the radesignation wou no causE negative adverse impar ts, the pplicant ` Submitted t 4 ese °.f .ndi page PROPOSED FINGS FOR SEP' BE R .7, `i !90 H EAR w . ,,, h� �7e� hard regara� es tuna Cat Council-,'may } i r..6 J, °,..�.i aac Ci ITERIA R SEI)111240.ilL lit 1990' e. criteria t F ouncil :' s cof13 .t�era' ollows: and .stand'ars , apihlis of ,.this ma'i eptendner' Com rehenaive 'plan , Policy 5 _ (Econom .0 Divarsafic-- i 'x.,1.1 The City shall .pra::�te. �,a�ct.ivi es aim he diversif ica'tion. of the economic- opportunities available to Tigard 'residents with pa icul.ar emphasis .')laced on the growth, of the ':11�cal job . p s market Cirehensave Plan Pula. 8.1.1 Tran2 r ta►t ion, 8.1.1 ` e City shall plan for at. of e,, and of f icent street l„ 1 roadway system that Lets , cui rent needs and anticipated future growth and 'development Statewide Mann %Go1 To provide and transportation' 12 (Trans it taat io J encourage a aafde, convenient and econonia, system. A transportation plan shall (1 ) oonsdet, alb. m6des to transportation includinng Mass' ;transit, air, water,, pipeline, rail, highway, bicycle and Pedestrian; II be based upon, ,an inwentor.y of ,:, local,,;+ regional and ,'. sate transporta:t°i.on,whees��4 (, ),..Consider tithe diti erencets .n racial t nsequenceS that would 'resu ,t frotc� til� ring differing omb� nations .of (4 ) ; avoid pr i'nc):pal Orel iance transportation �odeS; { upon any one mode of .trap jportat:! on; (5) m nimize adverse' social, ' economic and environ he ita3 . impacts' and. costs: (6) conrervse energy:. (7) ..:meet he needs the', transportation is� ►dvantaged by a imp►rova ng transportation Oervices, (8) faicilitate',! tie flow ►f goods ;, and servit es :so as to strengthen th ! local Inc regional econo�ar +� � ; and (9) ��conform� w'ith. regional compreensive land use plans: Fact flan, shall include a provision, fot! transportation � s , ► facility. Page 3 PROPOSEb FY'iDr, OS, FOR SEPT g �. EM8E � l i , � 0 ' HE s D• 4t 4 INIDINGS These in s emOnstra _ applicable „llE� ega1 !'criteria are fo-sat;isf.a e e ,al ove men ione rehen ��i,f, �e4t�,Plan•°. Pol ' 5,.h e 1 1, cons °o Divers]. :ca .cati;ci 1t: •. �Rp/t•� /1:��r ,��l� r�r��.l ��./�_s 5.1.1 The C, ty ahall promote. activities aimed at. the .1 �. r f� a. n of th n niic trrtunities c pie s �. cat o� t e �c� o opp e available to Tigard residents .with particular: emphasis placed on the growth of the : local job market. Findin he Planning Department Staff Report, found that the ' proposed zone; ,change would be . consistent with all applic- able Ccm rehensive Plan Policios with the Possible exception of 5.1.1 related to 4zonomic dlversiticatic.n. ;one Council .l considered this issue at length and has received additional information from the A PP licant> and Staf c. The Council finds that: 1. Thirty -two percent (241 . acres) of the C? ty's L /I -P zoned land is vacant or underutilized, while. 29 percent (`128' acres) of the City's C-G land is vacant or underutilized. 2. Forty -seven Percent . (166 acres) of the I -L /I -P zoned i land in the vicinity of the site is vacant or underutilized. 3. There is a total of 3 acres of CG land in the vicinity of the bite, all of which is developed for coll[lm'ercia purposes. 4. The 6.6 acrs represents 2.7 percent of the total vacant /underutilized I-L /I -P in the City o Tigard and 5 1 percent - City f ; of. the total vacant/underutilized C G a.n, the ti..tv o� Tigard. 5. The 6.6 acres represents 3.9 percent o.� s iibE remi vacant: /underutilized T -L /I-P and 100 percent of subarea, vacant /underutilized I L /X -P. 6. According to a Norris, Beggs & S'impsein invet tort' 16.9 percent of the industrial' space and 21.3 pert 4,unz c> tech space in the southwest area iJ vacant. 7 . j.'n the ' .. r.. S, according to 'the N rris Be s m ..n Inventory • 0 6 S • so 5 uth�t�'ie vacs .. n � rate for industrial /high tech spt4 a is about 20 percent., age PROPOSED a Fl!NDIN ? FOR SBP'rEil E 9 9 0I; r "1 8. The Norris, Beggs & Simpson commercial vacancy rates are less O.. Appl,yinq Average wage., totes to thesci-, .p oyment;,. figuire13:0hoWs, that coinmeial iprojed'ts,lgiineribe 'abut $201 per hovr per acre, and industrial 1:•()Jecte' about $210 per hour per-:;'Acte.'.''' These , findings are the basis for the City c.'inundil:' , . " conclusion that redesignatit'..‘r3 ithe subject 'property from :Industrial io'.domn■eroi. coiliplies With the--i'City-1::; Economic , ■ Diversification findings indicate that _ indvistrial and ,commercial development of, the":33.te.0 11.. nave about , the sante, economic .t.etits; 6t employment and income on .;., • • • • ,• • • , •. , • •.. • . • • , • • gard residents. B 0 s there ) Hi cons,i,dforable higher vacancy '' rate,. in industrial categories than in rtail come.rci.al in the area. k'urtner, this 6.i$ acre parcel represents a small E)6.,:centage of the total vactint/linder-tilitle4:1 also indicate that there is 'n vacant/uncle7h*utilized gorieral commercial land , in this areaof the AL4 a result, the City t;bncludet3 that a redesigllatioti:t . . this property for -•••••••••••-- • ;• -....-•-••••••••••••••••••••... ••••• • • • . • . ••• • • •• ....... ......•.. •. • •. • ••••• 1.• • ••• ,• •• ••.••• • •.•••••:••• •••• " •••• •• • •.•. •• • • • • ;•• •• ••.••. ,•••• • •.,. • ,.• _ similar manner las if. Iche property re't&ineu it ir.duStrial desir nation and will 1)roviar.,.■ 3..r.i.tetliate economic benefits as a cOnnercial development inasmuch as the property has remained undev(lope (Alt , nd-caa r taa r 'sys ena I that' mee irowth a d' development and statewide . ELOA�.ng Goal 2 .!'Tsdns,2art i2 R,^I� �n YP III �� ~° 'o px0,41f4de and encourage . a safe, convenient and economic indi catedi' tl1e ex st nee .: f heave traf;f.ic conditions at the . intersection of S.W. 72nd Avenue and 6c . Bridgeport goad. Sinele he OrtVon Depaxtmeut Hof Transportation ("ODoT ") initially expressed concern that the PT0Posed zone change would exacerbate the existin g conditions the Applicant sponsored extensive study o ° h.� 'tr f f is condi�: ins in the area► which inv l F f r ; ., t fie I DOT 0 ! „ . 1 ,cif 'T iala s i ai d Tigard, and � a hing�ton ounry. T 'te ; udy pr +duced sd� ►eral alt�ern�ativesh one wf which wa► a genes soluti n for the future • improvement, �f 72nd venue and S.w. •Oridgeport goad. tease studies and f finds that a 1'00: d-�va u!� Wiest thentersection of J:, fie+ Id�W�i�~, nci 1ib�is reviewe� .. The intersection of S�,I . T ;�xd Avenhe an . S.W. Bridgeport "'toad, and of S.W. Bridgepo t road and 1-5 ramp termini both n p p �:i��t�.on at an ' a ►cce table level of .service When a.nr�� endent' analyzOo. page G - PROPOSED NDI GS POR SkbT }�."M 'ER .990 HEAiti 1 X 2 e The , traf f a c problem evident at' ,thin leatioa &s the lack of ad'eg• ate' stacking distance, for, left '`t0r s, "which results' in traffic failing to- clean the , inter action. during .gr,!een .., 3`e ,Development of the bite under r-L zoning`�,will add'' r,ntof n �: n a.9 a cr the -1 ter83�ct o about ,74 P.M o �pea'k bov t trips � to t: ( � ,P projected .future 'total) white' c4 �-G , zoning would add abut .(51 trips j �(6 ".3w,.percent of future. total`) . 4. Most of the site- related traffic rncler C-G zoning would he exiting the freeway and turning right frog ' S.6,1. Bridgeport Road to s.W. 72nd Avenue, thus utilizing 'a noncritical cal. movement in terms , of intersection function. ' 5. The southbound S.W. 72nd Avenue to eastbound Bridgeport toad vehicle stacking c iatances ir,► the P.M. peak hours existing -- 113 feet with commercial development 02 the site with industrial development of the site 125 feet 123 feet 6. The westbound Bridgeport Road to southbound 72nd ;venue vehicle stacking distances in the P.M. peak hours ara: ii existing - -' 93 feet with commercial development of the site -° 82 feet with industrial development of the site " -- 93 feet 7. ODOT has a 1991 project 'to re- stripe and widen turn lanes to improve the critical intersection lanes. The applicant has proposed` traffic- related conditions'' for approval of the zone change, which the Planning Commission rrecommended be accepted, to ensure that th �Q�elo p merit of the site fulfill3 its traffic obligation. 9. Washington_ County has . .express e d • °a. willingness won with the ‘-her of fet ted jur isd icti� ns and 'property owners to effec tuate a lon g - term �nxrovemert, to the ,intersection of , nd Avenue and S . W. t_ Br idgopsar t Road 10, Torn Schwab of ODOT tiiry /cified before the Planning. cor mission that the Applicant's set idies and , col'c1usions were accu�rat`, and ; t h`, r change .O commer * subsquent devea pment wo} Ad nc,� iMpact t %e 4rfectqAd nterge c<<tin i signi.icantlY or differently ui.tter 1 the t .. zoning. As a rcesul,,,,,.r Staff . is ,gin concurrence with i��dust� °Yai OD T s conclu 'ion relative, to >tga fir ] „ss Based on thes:'je 00:440K •* aC ;t t1ounci'1 concludes s q. , itzion in the area�� wher0 ... he , c 3ta thence �.., a un�. ue traffic cons Page `a PROPOSED FINDINGS GS O SEPTEt BER 17., 1990 HEARIN C S Y tiv tic3ll/Aue/4 , 3137''°°1°7 Page 8 TROPOSED PINDINGS FR goakerfr:g&my Doer s, usirr , t, 4- ' i' l _ i83t1iA02140aTirt1i pS1**flhiV& PVICU� ,'• ..'"''''.'' .....,,,,,;„,-4..,.' 4 ,4.,',„'., '.' ....'',''..' .,..1--,„“„' • Tr Auhis. ,„„,. .. .......i.;....... „. ., '....'..i.-...'i,....,......-r-',........ ..;-..------ 1 4. ,'Ilad" g.064 ratili to : , • y amend ' ' Naive Plan ,„ " tho '' coallwrelleil Lgna Ltqh, ., Industrial 'to General Coome..ToLial. use? •:',.H. :is', .. .':,,,:,—,',',,',..''''''..1'' ',.',:'',1,.''.',,,'''''' ::::';'- :.:':::'''''''...,;'...:',- `':.:;''-''''''':11:.::'':::".•.'.'—'''' '':.,1',,,. i PieltgOist.,',13th* ' the 04*.*:, 'oe.'0.i.114ctira. ,r410,teited.-47*.',,lbOlte ..*1/ilidatici,ii,'',!.".'4,!ili,11)?■;1,11,,i?",;•';,;,,,,'''.,,::',,,, *nd t°421111):1101 ',.:*0')14,4°Sc11,,.,dilli's'Y:"I.tr‘'-''':ot-'11-11na,k;i'o'ili411,,filroatlililit,:inialli.,'',''''''''itrtagiii-O-S11*4'lq"°':174,-114'';'1-,A'11HI'll*td-tiSOlt1„,-17),:a..*10'''''6443°'Ce:',.-74ttiail,r.,:':*:;.„,C40.,'.4f;7r,,e'i'111.i,,:' . , letter from tans.,f elk° U ti t!; ,Iteith, Lidali: 104611 .epnitil4tig';,*h the iltatoi*Ii tte 0 ',;roltittioifilodi.,,,, ' ' ' i''' ' . ted on the ,r4Orthistiet g4adratit,O'Ithil,,,15/4:),!4*#111"4.4■11■111... ':66Cii,d""),,trl'IP1411))7t4liO''ilthattiltai' ri'PHY ' The Council ' .,,4-1d*Cat. 0,- A: ",tna-t : ,it, .4 'v,iohed ,,.., 0H11111. ' ''',, dd i,' 041117,,,,,,,,,,,„4„ iiitc•rts atiOn, regiti'dipg tit* liz!ir‘vent.'aliit*,t,....---...1:4-y.ftir :cOmmii,tcial .rind,.:industrial ,laib1,,y,,,..,,,...,, and a lien, '*iithin 131e , city ,anet, ',..L„v4e sost4eas' section jo the." 'Oity AttaCed.„*.e.-kk,,;,,,'.: ikfter '1"eviewing''tliiii ■LtiforMatLdItif-i'7.,h0 ttaff COritiii,* -to itlooilend eleinial Of , , „. . „ . , , .. to „„:, the proposal , kiased taivatt the filiditigs found . in”, +iii ' attached , -report' ,-,the . , '', ., ■ :,: . ' ' ' " l'Y .., ' ' , ,, Planning coingnifssit3n witkk:, the .niOditicatioll ft)tiiitel L:`4.'.:!;k he ,itc60610,111ialtlisig.-11:"11114' ' . ,, , ' l', . 1 ' . , , , ,' ,. ' ' ,, '11 ' , ,, ' , ,. . • ' ,- ' , ' ,. , ,, ,, „,-.: ,, ,,,,„ ..,..,, ,_ ,_ Please refer to , the $iSgii.,st 13 agenda packet . to 'real/lei* , the ,iiiiiiiiii,i4iir '',atilonkittcid to the City counoLl .' prof/A:only ''.' on th1.6 Loess.. Tile . full:, packet;', writ, gietireduCed for this meeting. ,, , ' ,H • ,, ‘.• , , , , , ',', , .: ,, ... , . , . . . . , , .. . • , , . • , , . , . 4 ,. . 4 , • •• ,,• . ,, , , ., , , , , • , • 4 RNATIIETUBER • „, , pp.,!ove the application and direct staff to corsr/artt an ordinanet, or ' formal adoption. Deny the retreat and (3irect atatt to .ixcapakret a corresponding reeol,Utione, , A\ 4i P Pat .Reilly,., City; Administrator 1AAT�� i 8 s>dsr. ' 'Pity .Development artnerr 1 1�,Ete rovi` wing <the information submitted by Lens Stout, the staff continuos to. re�Moe denial of the propomed change fry the Light ' Industrial to . ti a , i enoral for the subject '6.6 `acre parcel based upon the 'findings" air' the attached staff report with the following modif icationc • page, Inuli State Highway Division has changed its recommendation so th4t the Division short -rang* and long- range► so'iut ens i satisfied e�ii�h both the' shorter . , available for addressing the traffic situation in the vicinity of " the interchange. Page 5. . � underdeveloped land le While the applicant has Shot that vacant and underdev ped an ° . use and that on a available for both ' commercial ' d' industrial percentage basis this request is not .1ghly significant, it has n + shown how Policy 5.1• will be sati policy states the been satisfied. This THE CITY 1 LA L PR t»'= ACTIVITIES A1saer', AT THE DIVERSIFICATIO N OF IS$TDNITIEE AVAIL l8I.1E 1'0 TIGM RES1DEMTS WTH PARTICUl R H2EASPLACPD ON TIE GROW. i CAF' THE LOCAL .J0P MARANT. Policy 8.1.1 is h►atisf ied due to the revised comments fraa tab 'State HiChway Diiisi ©n. Page e 6. ti i y Part 8. D. of to report s iould be revised to reflect the tilieilded, State Highway Division comments. Pages 6. and 7. ,, an es i.n; zoning a roved by the Cit oi, Tualat o on . T1�ere have some changes g , s PP the east side of 15 but it has not been shown how these events hsvf,, resulted in ' a Change in circumstances to the west of i-s. I�. wt w i n• •Y V um 'PLANNING ISSION.� 1N0; "kATR .April 3 . 1990 7 :3`0 Ii' Le4ATION: ;Tigard Gity 'Hall 13125 SW Sall W1vd. Tigard, OR 97221 General Information a rrbsia4,1i+re .Plan Amendmer CPA 90'1'00 Zone' Change ZON 90 -6102 BAST: ; 1) Plan lap 21me .!meat from Light Industrial to General Commer0i, ial ; 2) Zone Change from Ire =L (Light lnduatrial) district to C--C (General Uommercial j dictr .ct A >PLsCANT sPi ker Partners 5265 Meadow ,Road Lace Oswego, OR 97034 OWNER :' RinS;har� Invertaiaente 3939; 'NW St. Helena Roar Portland,'OR 97210' AGENT: �c�enzie %9aito & Associates (Lane Stout' 0690 SW Bancroft St. Box 69039 P.�IJ. Ho '6 Portland, OR 97201 -0039 LOCATION: Northwest padrant of the intersection of ?iit exetate Lower Roo, en ,Ferry Road at intersection with , SW 12ni Avenue's; and Bridgeport 'Roads PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: WC'ri24 231 11131 D, Tax `Lot 170 8aokg ound Informs' • atiou The property was annexed to ;the `'City of Tigard in 1976, and as 'bn zoned I -L since that time. ind or irel0Pmegit ton or th a Parcel have be reviewed b the t$.tY sinc e nexa e I.. 6T APP REPORT CPA '90- 0004/20 90 -0002 - 3PIR' R rRRTNE • 3 cinitL Information 'l'he subject acre site is bounded on t ►e'.west bgF SW ,72 nd, tt , ,gait; oe t�wa north -by-the— .O on Business p 9, .on ''SOU,'''' b ? ua ev i optic# fight« f -way along Tor Boonas Yerg" Road. Bursrcufh *slag v;a�xfs and soni;�u�:l clo;.�ignaUone are an induatrir<i.i` park aona . is o the i �.°th the for a Wa►ah ron county quarry, icbr is Weerd- I -P 4!..1.7 str .a1 park) 'and w..1#'*,, is. currently being 'filled in` p .xatlon • or i �i '''',:the., future lopmnnt',, is to ,he. wjst' Tri is ;k�ar�y' and! r' Ride is to the south. across _ r es car Roa+ within th Cit Tualatsn; and � -S to the east. Industrial d�nl tint' ein•` p t aunt l�r r . use din the wait silt of t q freeway cats ha e, * helr'es i co mercia l development is -the predominant, ' use o�n► the , as *i t' ride., Site :Information stud T IeyIsai ;Isscri o A is generally . flat ' t�tnd is � s39.ghtly b'«]�ow he 6.6 � f • a�crs eende�e].o d site the grads ;of. the freeway thereby proiding substantial • .re to freeway traffic. There is % stSilki of 'large Oougiea Ply trees on the'' site along with some smaller sieciduoua traits and low, flying , brush. • The applicant' requests a ' Plan HAP amendment from right Indus tsrial Ito General C rcial and a zone Change from the ' I -L •(L4,ght Industrial) zoning district to the C"-c (General commercial) zOning district. The applicant as s� a itted a states8nt designate: d R r tt_Ea Sup s Pr ads ®d �U endment to tile Git of Tigard a !a Zoning Hap. , In Addition, the a pp iicant has submitted tra �f f iC study in Y P ar form zed Within ' the Narrative ' se�mroari in tabular The traffic ' study is -Although the proposed redesignat ion would mate the subject property _ le for develo development or 'conditional use allowed in the C-.G zoning district, the app „ � g 'Y �'. �lican� "',.r Narrative and available pme � of an Of the Permitted traffic study focus on usd of this site for ! a cc*bined hots]. and retail center. Hotels and retsil ' .sales aim p$rmitteL uaee ,in 'thee zone and are not either Permitted ar 'conditional !yA ti tilr in t,. a pa seat I -h zoning designation alied to the ` property . `Agency and NF Coo sment s The Engineering Division has reviewed the ; aopoaal: a offers' the following coMmentss As mentioned in the herri' .arse,' ads storm an rY S � d a to serve the e d. 9�n��.ta sewers in 7aew �►venu 'The applicant Sian eubei tted a trP f f ic" study showing propoBes, zoning W Uld ,',.result ' is' iucreaseid traffid ki Jeao Road /S. W. hridgepo� portion ox 'the I=5 ,intiei�t+chane ' Oregon State Highway Divisioaa )ins , sd'tew..red the study STAFF 11SPoR - �PFi 9ti= O404ZC 3 ©=O�pa - S"ISR' ;l?T1�tS' YY' at L .4 dcete- anint'd that while thee intersection currently acceptable lever aa, serviv a with " limited reserve capacity, approval of the proposed appll cation : would cease the intersection to reach its capacity. mui h leaner., , '-oonse4uoratili thee AHD does'' Division 'not favor the3 proposed web, oltiangeo. The itng3.neeacfng , vitiates this concern ai 4 * 'therer,ore recomme d. that .;the application be denied. The Oregon State Ni 9 lrma y has reawetd h the eSomrnented dcvtt4opa•rnt under the r ova p eropcoiaea.: ' and tae zoning typically arould dbe expeCted, to generato aware traffic thaar,, trhe c�stinc f -L T one. The Log '(Level Df Se ►ice) .aa alysis .ind:litetm a "D" levee currently exists at this interchange. Development of UIes under then. proposed zoning would use the limited available ,'capacity,of t,he: j' iterchange much sooner • than uses under the existing' zoningi There are .,nly Short term ,tVisProvertiorits planned fOr this interchange: Tie 'Highway Division d& st not favor rezoning ;, that would exceed this inwherohange ! s capacity aoc ner i than the► e : t ng zone g The Highway Division also has couw ente d that the narrative report does, not say how driveways will be provided to servic he site. The Highway Divisioi assumes that the development will have only one driveway at the, northern end of the property, with no' Signal at that driveway. To do this, the ; frontage would need to be > 'Ong enough to locate this' driveway approximately 300 feet ' from the traf €il at tower, E`oones Ferry Road. The City of Durham has reviewed the proposal and has requeesteed that emery effort be mad° during development of the site to preserve as "y possible, u t help pre r ddit on► i of ou o viror. 'sent in this artir�k, ar air ''ihed.�, e our _ areas � . as e,®itbie, ipn ord�� a h earv3n ace aia: quality ff ic controls should be p%aovided in order to *mauve coordinated use Of .72nd and Lower Boones Ferry goad. The City of Tualatin Planning Department reviewed the proposal and offer ed cminente regar din g thee a pp reca nt 'a t.■,efic y but made no recommendation regarding; the proposed Plan AmenlmentiZone Change. Tualatin r uestioned 'the traffic analyryis b aasiumptions regarding the timing for the future ,extension of Durham Road to 10 r ardi•n t 72nd Avenue and for the addition of turn lanes at the :I- S /Law,rer Roories,t :. Ferry Road interchange. Tn addition, Tualatin questions the val .dity of assumptions regaa` inc the amount of t.. item that wild', result, from dayeve -1`� traffic. The tlity Of ai�s alatin y @ �i traffic aat.al is' statealrent that thin interchange and the surrounding see y y roadways Arad tides area regional issue. Should. the requested °lands. use; PP . encou ,.... ... � �' � Y . y ' .. ��: ..: intercfisaan e y ., roThe�en�' I change bar a roves, tho C3t� of Tualaatin era e® the Oit o y support' yP to steti�tel ppo nd g r e�,�a a projects in this area. f u ure The B g ri Water Distr shin on aCo p u$ldin Div .e�.onai and Tran nation Gee P hit g ict � �aee hest ,. Department of Land Use n Po e � � fro,._. 'sa3 have ` .. � eral� Ted. �n +.� have reviewed the p Pe and iaeued no co elenti or �.�b eaect` one ' o OTAFF REPORT -j CPA 90- 00041;SC 90' -0002 SPIBKER .PARTNERS do l . • } 0, • a other cents have been rectal. FINDINGS :Atip c i..+` tsion reoev , ant C rr iteria in t M® come are ,statewide laaan.ngr +OO,ale and 12' cwbensive Plan 'oliea _ :.2.1:.1 4.2.1. .L, 7 7° 8.1.1, 3.1.3, and 12.21.1 (l�atir nal Criteria for "the Genenrah rmaeercial U a); ,ate the change ar 'mistake q aasi ju411141 � 1 Pl Ra N*, P en snt criteria of both the 1)ev�.iog, tit :,, t�oa�prrrrhe�eneive Pl►n and' unity. The :Planning Division concludes ;,',hat. the propoa &tai is only piLvtially in compliance, with the applicable stet.'wide Planning Goals based upon the .. following ;findingea • Goal 01 (Citizen Involvement) its satisfied because. 'che <'flity 'gas e le pted a citizen invol yement program includ , t review of all land use and dev�ll oome at applications ty neighborhood planning organiza ion© (NPEHs) . ' In addition, all public notice regeire Bets related to this applicetien 'have been satisfied. • Goal , ¢2 (Land Use Planning') is .satisfied because the City has appli0 d all. applica,�ble Statewio+ Planning Goals, City of i Tigard Co nprehtinsive Plan policies, and Coao;kunity Development Code requirements eo the review of this proposal . 3. Coal #9 (1$conoagy of the State) .in satiai!ied' because the pr'oposie sedesignatica►n` would increasb the City ' c inventory Gf developable . coemerca.t� no.tez' g ld decrease Pahl tried2hland. No netu' ,tact on lo. n the t Land a the in as�fo �� :L � City foreseen � n the pr4uos�ed redesigns Lion. �' employment' in the Ci e. ''oat X12 (Transportation) is not' satisfied. because the , 9 to t promised redesi gnation couldi lead t raffJc from comeaercial uses to .be davelo eeadin the remaining traffic 'cap ci' Pte, on the Site exc g' ty o can �- g ., re nec sser- .. improve tae stn , ad agent streets end, the = 5 nterchan a �befo e � can be mace to improve an alrc�:ady. ��, sere traf f 3.c congestion sfte�tation Development under the current induetria1 designations w�cau�ld 'exace�ir Bate the exiatir'g ti ,'a fie congestion,'' 15# to lesser degree than would )tae expected with mot potential r„ onrarrcial use types Staff ha® deterintned that the ptoposeP #16 n Map , hser:doenc/tbne . C*400; only partmlLy oon ®ietea* ` it h Can p rehensiv ©. Plan •haried ;u0,1 nndiag® below: e'( P1 an P a epic 2 �. Organization � ` ®a►i.iefied.. , . ,bracause ,t(eghborirt�d � Planning y � .:t a_ 5 and sutrounding property owners Were gi ►den not o f public hearin ,.� a related to the ' r g request and to their opportunityc'a comment ►gin the prOposal4. 2. Plan Policy 4.2.1 wig 1 be satisfied 'through, the i eve pment r 6T FF R JI'ORT - GP :tt .90- 00041ww '9,0 -0042 ,= 9PIEKF.R PA,R' t3 p -J building pez.mit processes at w'i(eic1a: time : a development, proposal' or this .sit® must be shown to co ply with applicable .- h'ederal Btate, and, • regional water quality requiraeaenta includ.nt prepdration and. implenentation of a nor = point •urce „pollution ' `cout :"n1 plan,' isi compliance with the Oregon Environmental: �xality Ctiasaiesio►n' �i temporary rule* for' the Tualatin ,'.River Basin. The, prcpo red': a edeeignation dos' not 1 iby ,itself *fleet compliance 1Kiith t.4.11 ;plan:. Policy. i`i the A �� t r�YV�,�w` 1 nt+ed thrau w P ego 4.3►.`i io , im rare 1w Zsin, Zicy � � � � � � _ . • p .,,,•,, oiclw�ss in which building ,plat . m snt amd 'landscaping, are ir,c►viewed, with • respect to mintalaing ;r +;;oi,je impacts , of 1 the developia,i use upon neighboring land uses Plan pclicy 5.1.1 LO not satisfied beecaa\smt this proposal { will not unhand* the economic divers ity `►f the Tigard area, Thar; sub)ect'i '�roPertsy is located ed within the .prie::ary izudustrial area in the City which keclsdsi an area from Sandber g lead to the southern City limits. and free,.* 1.1.-6 to Fenno creek. This area ir import r nt because theme is no other land within the City 'limits ox, the 3rban Growth Bou ,iary that is as well suited for' indued;rial' sativit { from the standpoint of parcel sixes, terrain. transportation facilities, and compatibility, euith surrounding users. Plan Policies 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, and 7.6.1 are aatissf ied because` adegUate public :service capacities are available to e'-,rve future develoPment of this rOitae. Extension of necessary public facilities to s' +er�yve' the a ;ta are the responsibility of the ' developer: The City of Tigard notifies applicable ;public and privatu utility providers of p .riding development applications. 6. Plan Policy °.1.1 is not satisfied pause the proposed redesLgna ttien real t �� wools bexp1@eted' could lead to develo ant ofr uses on the site whic tdo �ntran: under ex' would be expected ith h_ development h..: existing Light Industrial (I -L) designation. This increased traffio would potctnttalli have' ne e'intersection of atiipact traffic safety on nearby etreeta, eepecia y� t a Lower Boone *Perry goad; 1 -5, Bridge: Port Roa ,1, and 72nd Avenue b ` Co mente by the Oregon State Highway Division indicate that this intersection is presently near. Its ' maximum capacity aud. no '., substant.ia improvements are foreseen in the nea1.b future. Further overloading'of exacerbatetthe tion; /interchange through cc erc'� Ul developmen� would th . g g , Y the }ea:tetin �:on. eetion that efety hazara`ts. y�; � the day .end would therefore increase traffic n; xissc® at man " t3.f►�:.� of Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied as a condition of approval of any future dev the COapletio , .oe L treet �, � to ... ��. as at e Site. on improvements longof the sei 'ss frontages wog ld© ec`e ,fi r Pe equ be Metalled by the developer r at the, time of dovieic0 seat. � � _ ��: � � , ; The.° E g ` a a g ii t Oregon state ah yv h my £ i , , Cit : En *Hearin, vision, the h�ivi. ®rod � and the f TU Y ti ;� would review any Utters +de4eicpme t propOesle for the a e w.th regard to ritece2.10surj road improirtMentis. JST� R 1 C' T - C'PA 90-0004/lc 90 -0002 : PIRXER ' nRTNERS a • P • a•• v n I The locational criisria for General Cc arc Chapter 12 of the Ceropreehansive Plan (Policy' 1) partlat satisfied for the followirq reason'es A. MTbee ,subject area . is not surrounded .hY •residential develop anent on more than . two aides. The closest residentially designated operty is in 'excels, of 1/2 mils 'r away., asses "spifiC' e 'r: 12.2. • As d 41, au isrd above under _ at widie • Planning iioal. #12 and' Plan Policy , i . 1, staff is not . ; ' p.r, �L dttd that the pror�osid ccmastraia re dosignatioi% would not •eubstentially increase traffi4 on ,adjacint tceeta and interseotiona and thereby exacerbate ,a st <.:ting traffic congestioh situation. to - an *nesatisfactory.:!. vel ano, incrkiase traffic safe {:y concerns. :This corc'lueion io 'basted 1 tr jely upon *she analysis and cseendations of th�� O egort dtatr� 8d.ghway Divisio and :th.°. City Of Tigard pagineering 'rig tsis,►n. Thee site is located a' the intersection of an artOttial ' (X -) and several • ma jear co7.leecfyor street•. 16. 0• to the site for any future `de9e]�opakint will be 40terninedd in con ju atton with the Ore non State +; hway Division through' ghee development r'esview process. raps rtation is available across Lower Boo='ieee F D • Pblic t po eery Road Prow the site at 'the Tri let Park and itide. s omeod. a variety •of Bib ''he b 3CSA r>GA to acc 6, site i an adegaate district,• uses arnmitted in .the C- zoning a A Fa This site is hiF4hly 'visible from the adjoining a f greets, ` especially X -5 Q ▪ Comgatib lfty of this site with djac nt uses is difficult to ascertain without an i actual de velopmen ,propoe4wl. However,'; the g nit; peveloomenl Review d Col ditioit Use City of cisses �aro intended to provicki opt ortr only 'for review prance al d ®v io. - i onehip with adjacent review _of • a potenti . elop�agent 'a ��ntl indt^,atsi.,nl ', roruaty `. existing vises. Because the site abuts y 'P , p. and - major atreeth, ,:compatib;.lity. ireue0 4a0,.V ing future development would tae `-ant=, cipate tit 0,110 .mal except . 4th regard to , traffic; .cOnceree tUill In osdok to approve a quasi - judicial amendment Ito the plan and zoning neaps, . the City aunt also find that there 7�s , evidence of a change f a Lhe ti` neighborhood or dcommunity whit a affects the parcel. Alternatively, t : ;7;. City gist find that there has been a mistake oar inconsistency with tegard� to tires original designation of t ie parcel (Comprehensive Plan, 'olume '1', Policy 1.1,1, Implementation Strategy 2; ommunit;f Developmek`at Code 3ectiO4 18-22,04614))61 The applicant' a Nrrat ivew asserts , +ihet there has been a1 cb Ange in the character of the area surroundir"ig the site because' bf the r; sulbeta t .al mount of comsmercial development', that has occurred w .t ii> the STAFF` REPORT CPA 90- -4"1®04 /ZC .1GP0002 - iSPIBri iota 0 471 KL.NZ AI rO &ASSOCIATES, PC 'ARCH tiCTURE „ 9N NG, INTERIOR c EstGt 06?6S.W,' BM( BOP' ST • P.O. BOX' 69039 ' , PPORTLAND OREGON ,972;11 0039 0 ` O3} 224 -9560 • FAX 228 =1285, City,, of Tigard Attention: Keith'JLiden 13125 S.W. ! Hall Blvd. P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Spieker /Bingham Zone Change Project Number 190106 Dear Keith: Enclosed package of i n for m ati on wh i h responds to the City Co unci` $ request addi t i onal information with respect to our Proposed Plan Amendment/Zone The r Counci l's requested t rfovmatl o included existing commercial and industrial land, available l easabl e space, e�p l oy ment and wage 9 nerati on and hi story 0 planning decisions in the area. The material that we hae assembled includes 1. An inv Y entor of land ' zoned Commercial and Industrial i t Tiga i . A summary of lease, apace provided by Norris, Beggs, & Simpson; 3. A letter from John Ingle, 9 Economist, with Palnar, Groth & pie`kz, addr essing .. employment and wages summary . ummar of CPA /ZC applications in Tigard; and � �, Telephone Conversation documenting A conversation with Janet 5 • A YoUng, mmu� ti .e Development Director, City of Tualatin. Young, C® y This information � n � ca es the Following, conclusions: , 1 and ` ansq t � u I,,�re i s n There •'s less vacant /underutilized CG land than IL /IP , 1, C here 7 the s atep , 1. vacant/underutilized i zed CG land i n the ” subarea including Thee') is a coibsderably higher v Cane' rate In ,industrial categories than i n retail commercial; +• a abo�u the gem r nab Industrial and -development of the ti . cot • economic impact in, terms of ' emp oyment -and i ncome r .. � w • ons i'or. C ,Zor�'ug i n Tigard i and - �+o:��: There have been few; appl i+ �t� same issues and site characte�ristiCS as our proposal t and 19 ' ` S bare Subarea PROPORTION' 6., AG .I'S 0.8% OF TOTAL I L /III 6.6 AC IS 2.1% OF TOTAL VACANT /UNDERUTILIZE IL/IP .6 AC IS 3.9% OF ,SUBAREA VACANT /UNDERUTILIZED IL/ 6.6 AC IS 5.1% OF TOTAL VACANT/UNDERUTILIZED GG 6.6 AC IS 100% OF SUBAREA VACANT /UNDERUT I L IZED ' CG, Undev' t111 zed t nc! udos sites deve d oiled bUt ,not to . the 1 nay bs ty of use 'allowed by the rohltig City of iigards, 1990: (including uupub1 i she Q+KCNI te; ? GammaquAlEm MACKENEit moot (M22U ITO Sc ASSOCIATE , eING1ON (200) 4sM•Mor5 GIIIES141110 INCO PO! mHognoNgoto 411420 ��...�- ..,."? ,: a@KL KCRO ry iACOt 4i Q -W L ' Vttel4G,dN GT ST �rdw mos � y �'a>W t�,] r..iy N i 1 1 't , � . -..... ..�. " 'ilJl��} �•y ..- ;a , �Iq (pv�t��y wr ..i"s � �^ a tEP�3�S 0,! ,v41. NOW OA .T y.�i va. *�`` �� 1153ER 1 j/ " 4YdIP /RG r �j.lE 'T A/,q f :.� `•7: M r f/ r t ti4 }1 iC s af 1 ' �. t ` .=1! PALL r V� 1• r SW +. _ q . a ,^^+,ll� A I'AMTl1'. Cr HANA .• .: u� R I t 9 r J i;6Alt• "� i 1, vSe " e� ." " na '�� ; ' sw ,, + A, �ya�� yait►uintw L 31Q 1:n�Dpa "' NY . • '.'r w. Y� S .a G' ' ; (V// l•. •F:F11�. 9T d COCLE�rw.w� .r ��` 1 E' C•' i `,.4t► Q L • flSC' p�e --ljQ s ''' a t 7c. ,T.•;► t Ir tlt3;y,0aatWOt1TN � "�... .a `(�, ,9�g $ I -'•:' q�, V��+ -C� -; .* ;,/.�.: a}M,. IIID J `•V r,+ v. vit. ,'� at ` W ELMHURST: ST .l �. 11 .t '�.. CT ii. • ~ ��b^e XeK C� . La O' � � , �G` .. S �-PO e M�(i�� i '``: r f A(i,�t `iMan�irn i !J: �+ G ""' I. ▪ i )H$t •,w► c f,.;'. Tao • ', fro t Caw 4 a CrMID • ?1 �► g �'' 1S , N A ; .» a LL______:"' wa • i `� V j� E1 ;dPE£Kt FT "v "If: H #� r ,= t, . Aq� K P �7F d `tom 5 ` { �t i:r• a f•1 t r ,ti w.� tbr +o�\`�`fi� Zg `", sC�r p tRWN ., r i 6 " 4-+01 410 ; ..r. , SW C11Hl1T41 j - 0. h 1 SW t'AAN Is.04": �.'� cr • \ .. • SO �. P .t +t.. t..,r�'.Y ^li fwv -v. r �rAt . �`.r� G. 4� ;# � r .til ^Eov MIAr i' •,s t,.z SW nn U err 1. a -b p� j$ .e; .� e� WRtR trp0 .5i\ �j q�� Mt ,,,Rr ls,y ..l 4 , . 4 Qh r't �� ., � A ♦ z SW '�► ti �YG \�..r ■- 1 j 4+�., '?d G▪ ovt A w •l!%"� Srw1W,w�'��.a�.,.".•� nQ, 4�'..? • • •rr A t C2 Tw \ CHF AYf nq g L5 r y s Wi/ V t " f pt��E• ' Mrac „ r' +. ir1.. u• vt. ;, 1 M� 1 -. .�(,L� ' �.'I `�o -:T a.+ G R 19l[T,11 LlV7 i .O , '�r.. At '*.r . •r se's e1 nv sN t�] it T �W • e7TH r` s� TEN kR car ( I 1 • r ▪ t re ti • . , �i: •EmLRI (' ,• ,.. _�mti ". �... -..�L w ` i8 + j .. �A ... 1 �: � � & =1' 11 1 ..♦.IA.1 �L ..�eL • At4. r ' .. .� i �. ��..Iis `aV�°'I%1 mea 1.SAV Aw nobe- AL NYBERG MACKENZIE /SA TO + ASSOCIATES ASSOCIATESi R C' EGON (503) 2249570 WASHINGTON (206) 4514005 MAC E IE ENGINEERING i �IN COi OII # ' b MULTI- TENANT INDUSTRIAL /FLEX SPACE SURVEY AREA SC RY • d_ = = ======= = = =_e__ .= SOUTHWEST ` -AREAS SFAVAILS % .P.. tre`.... e. s...... .. TOTAL- SF TO LEASE VACANT 1- 0TR 2 0TR swe rimes c�,i�er; sse- ee -�.e ►wry. �... SUNSET CORRIDOR HIGH TECH! 2,416,132 634,168 26.22C 210,954 62,529 INDIJSTRIAIr 0 PHA H ®A- N/A Ii /A. eerar , 01,01001.,.: - were eww we.. o wee TOTAL . 2,416,132 634,168 26.2% 210.9N4 62,529 INTERSTATE e 5 UIGH TECH INOUSTRIA HIGHWAY 217' HIGH TECH 2,615,44-5 410,:35` 15.7 65,091 - 43,656 INDUSTRIAL 932,610 141,146 14.4% 4,515 12,000 ==_s =2=2 = - 2===882=. - s == =sa- !a=Jam...ta:- :aL_sror.=« 303,.408 200,651 25.0% 25, ! i99 13,236 2,391 130 420,424 17.9% 24",47:-,-.21 129,260 1001 e,10Y - 1010eew�e _ .0Y.s.0• 3,194-,533 62�,- 75 19.7? �f$;520 - 142,496 ======== a as =st:=: -- a s arsas_� - 3,598,055 551,684 15.3% , 69,606 55,656 =soesaz =�_�oz�a ====rat ¢a =as== usa =ris S€ UT(UEST . SUNTOTAL. HIGH TECH INDUSTRIAL; 7,834,9851,245,357 21,3 %, 311,644 %w,421 3,373, 740 569,5i0 16.9:1 _ 247, }:36' -1414260 IOTA . 9,208,725 1,814,927 19.71% 549-,080 260,681 StritZSiblift129113 :131a:231Ma :mss :8 =11 sg: ■xtna assxas$sa: RETAIL VACANCY SUR 6 SOUTHWEST AREA AUGUST 28,'1990 `"TOTAL AVMLABLE PERCENT,. P__SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEES" , L SE0 FATE' t�0�9ECT1A ®�3RESS S a FP& D MCc`YER TUALATIN 187,0 o 100% NIA 192100 S.W. Martinazzi Tuadatin, OR 97062 ., ri 4 i r �'_ 99% • X12 °16. ®V GY141:d LA N CONVENIENCE CENTER 15,4288 2,170 TtJA T1 7900 S.W1. Nyberg Road Tualatin, OR 97062 MERI DIAN SQUARE S.C. 123.879 100% NiA 3400 Lower Boones:Ferry Rd. Tualatin, OR 97062 OS�WEGO VILLAGE CENTER 79.1 i9 2,255' ' 97% $16.00 NNN 11 S., State Street Lake Oswego, OR 97084 ,.00 !MN LAKE OSiIVF,.`GO CENTER y , .. 0 1,300 98% $6 74P. 330 SW First Lake Oswego, OR 97034 TOWll4E SQUARE AT MOUNTAIN PARK 72,188 10,0.E g $14.x';') NNr 34Monr ;.ParicwrCy Lake OswegO, OR `,97034 TIGARD PAY LESS CENTER 11;233 5,100 93% S6.50 NNN 12060 SW Main Tigard, OR 97223 SQUARE 60,000 6,952' 88% $12.00 NNN 19455 S.W. ' Martinazzi Tualatin, OR 97062 5 909 °° '12.513-14.00 ` N�SN KRUSE MEADOWS COMMERCIAL CTR 54,000 , th% 9. S.W. Bangy & Bonita Road we OR 97035 Lake Os 9 __o, ..E ._ 50,223 3, 92% $1 2-14.00 NON LAKE PLACE, SHOPPING CENTER 361 S. State Sweet Lake Oswego, CA 97034 �, 0 � 100% NIA;' SOUTH L�► C RITE 6 46,200 1/8.15 S:W. 65th Avenue Tt,halatln, OR 97062 t ,. 'UAL' SHOPPING oEttittl 44000 Us 95% $11.00 I\INt' 29040 S.W. Town Center Lapp Wllsonvi9le OR 97070 CARMEN CE 15933.S.W. Ca man T!gard, OR .97224 W LSONVI LETO 'JN CSR.. 298 )i5 Towrd Ce�oter Loop` d l�stahvill�, OFI 97070 RIVER V OOD CENTER 29955' S. VIA., 1®oones Ferry Rd. W!lso v #dt�, 04 97070 18,409 2,500 86 ► $12.00 ce itu v�. • PALMER ROTH :tom P .E i. K.!`- AUG 3 illac:':J,nyic /Ssitt ". As3ociat2s MacKenzie Engine3ri g Incorporated August 28, 1990 Mackenzie /Saito & Associates, P.C. Attention: Lans Stout 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street P.O, Box 69039 Poi tlan i, Oregon 97201 ®0039 Dear Lans '�rou have requested my professional opinion on several issues related b the economic impact of commercial versus industrial development, and specifically as they relate to the proposed BinghaLVSpieker zone change .ge in the City of Tigard. I will address each 'quest 1on separately as follows: Etimlgyee Density - 'Li ht industrial projects typical in Tigard, include a mix or office, mapufacturing A, . and warehouse ` space. Overall/ accounting for this mix this type of project usually, Produces about 20 employee's per acre. This is based on a 35 percent building coverage and a .10- 15 percent office. build - out General commercial development,. with a 30 P e� -cent coverage will p � generate an average of 25 employees per acre. I. This �, employment de4nsii.ty includes general retail, hardw4re, food stores, restaurant /bar, appliance /furniture, hotel /motel, personal and business services, finance, insurance and real estate firms These employment d ens density figures are based on results from • NETRO's Study, 1990. The building cc'y "erage percentages are industry standards typically Used in emp,,Loytment proj e : Aons c' 3,3-Light industrial employee a wages and average about $10.50 per hour including , ufacturing jobs. Wage generation as therefore about main 3 $ 210 . �? 0 an hour per acre. Other wage information Compiled b y y the State of ore g o c° e Employment Division, indicates the average retail trade employe earned $3.04 an hour in 1980. Therefore, general commercial. development generates about $201:00 an hour per acre. 'ir �IIwJ'W. I I\E %I Ei,l. ,1)""RlLatiu.G�fi ►( '472()4 • raYlitL?C- rk ►,�,; Exi i I t 1 I i (__ ti e *FAX 1,tr;r _i. -._..z • \NC0LA Ht ?, r AND. SA(. (AMF\ro titrW l,i,Y It Ptilt NI I 1 :; tSrY,l`It tr, c.RLY I I. �t:, IyI OI IYF I .I 11 r ♦ . v1Att it i »iY� 1� U I. 'it t ri:Sh rt lNI' .l ttit ih r U.11 tlttl ti, 1 ('till)!. ICI r rtt+� Ir11 r : µ N45 r. Larks S „ou' ivol1;,0« ;1 at:. is clear from the above odata aat commercia . development off,: f erent '' , nomic mpac�t . Further, � the critical io � ' eco site, will have insignificantly did � su than ind '�xstrial development th , the. total job generation, which is higher , with the proposed commercial zoning. ew a'® Growth - -ln the decade of the 1980's,° the Portland metropolitan area suffered a restructuring of its industrial base. During the recession, manufacturing jobs were lost at a rate of 340 employees annually. Non-manufacturing jobs, b ' comparit on, increased at a pace of 10,970 employees annually .between, 1979 and 1989. During the decade of he 1990v s t Employraent Divis io n /, estimates that 92 percent of al l new jobs will be in seri ice , . producing, Or, non manufacturing industries. ' Crow ' in ,general commercial occupations (i.e. retail ,and service workers) 'Will to account for 38 percent of airticipated employment over & decade Consequently, the cletand for new general, commercial space will' increase more rapid. 'fir than the need .far in�anz r ial space. I believe the proposed zone change ii ,consistent with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 5..1.1 because economic diversi.cat4.on is i'c�ii:ainahle if the City can respond to changing economic conditions including growth in the ioc l job market. Past history has shown, that indt.strial development of the ,subject property was by- passed fog: locations in Wilsonville and Tualatin, L while similar Properties in the immediate area were quickly developed .for :general.commercial uses It is my opinion, . based on this site information and my general � ew and' for � �a.enr.e, the ��.nc�nam /�p�.e�t r will not de its unic, ►e attributes and ability ind�tatri, � .. caus�e of . attributes . to �l purposes be Cause a need this property lt, satisfy � C-�eC� � ®�' higher -quality �.'� � Commercial from sites. �i3 e�"'�jp�' T�13.t1�o�1'�,` the City will see no economic b p p the zone change to general commercial. �n summary, restructuring of the economy indicates t att a majority loc job growth r n the non- manila tur flg or of the al ob will occur �� ..,, .. , g Consequently, . able emand f � g service-producing sectors . the d commercial acreage appears ; More favor than industrial. a. c et. D pc C and , Market gesearc CnA'ugi 'n24';1!9°4e.rY'Offeg (°',thet Planning reviewed the chngeCockeifron.lg84ite present. The foil owl ig pi leati ons included Commercial zoning: • CPA 12-85 to CO (,2.8 ac,) at the inters!ict:16,s Grera71:4ui70/"CasCad, 'CPA 09-86 IL to CG,,(Ctrmaili Centlor)-4denied , '11CPA 06-86/87-01 R25 to CG,(AlhertiOnsi)-.,approved. n CPA 88-01 ... R3.5 to CG (Triangle area),,,,,,,,,a,pprtiitid ,"• 'cPA'81 -03 ... R3.510CG (Triangle aee)'"g4PPri'ved . .. . , ,. . ,. cc: Jerry Offer, Keith Lidett - Cit,y.of Tigard fa. - Jim Eddy - Spier.er Partners ite Stuart Bingliani - Bingham 'Investments I.- U) . . , 171 MACKENZIE/SAITO & A 0690 S.%!!'. BANCROFT STREET • ' (503) 22!s,, r0 ®' FAX (503) 228.1285 IATES, P.C., OREGON OX 69039 PORTLAND. OREGON 9T'c.tti RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION JOB S � eker Zone Change JOs Na 190106 TIME DATE 8/22/90 �,_.. INCOMING ,GALL, PERSON Janet Young ._. OUTGOING CALL COMPANY City of Tualati n ._........,._ ____� PHONE NO 41 Recent rezoning in the area includes 1 Costco's site M.L. to ) R�r� ,RI�s � - C.�e , an art of C ®s eo s Safeway/G.I. Joe s M.L. to . The rationale a for these �, an�es w as „based on comprehensive Plan Policies which indicate the suitability of commercial uses in areas with pre, :xi Iii ty to 1-5. The staff has consistently ex r ressad resistance to non - commercial uses ''i n ubp tic story a on the east - as approved since it. for Est side of this area, except I 5 which c w is a low traffic generator that is not purely industrial Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation. If an errors or O11SS10fS are noted, please provide Cr° ttei1. res p ®se !TRW five days of receipt. LS/i1 ' cc: Greg Hathaway . ��1,rve . Schubef^t & Barer' Jim Eddy - Spl,eker stQ Ri ngham - B1 ngharn Construction e 6.010 Tualatin Development Code` 6.010 6 COMMERCIAL PLANNING DISTRICTS 6.010 ..o. t. ,. t i Tualatin has oc- curred Commercial development curred primarily in the downtown area and near the City's 2 Interstate 5 Freeway interchanges at Lover Bool.es Ferry Road and Nyberg Street( Downtown development consists mostly of retail, service, and office uses ranging in size from small, locally owned firms to large national chain stores such as K -Mart. Development near the interchanges is ,redominantly :'automobile a0ra.ented = and ::includes Motels, service stations, and restaurants (2) At present, there are approximately 165 acres of land zoned for commercial use, but only a 1ittl over 1/3 of this land is 'developed. Two factors account for the bulk of the undeveloped commercial sand. first® much of this land is in large parcels (l® or more acres) owned by a few ma , jor• developers such as SchniJ 4;er Invest- ment entp Corporation. These firms have held their land in , large favorable to anticipation of .economic conditions v ®table f ons scale commercial development. Second of the unde`� much ' veloped: coaercial land is in the 100 year f l,o6d plain of the Tualatin River and is .thus subject to additional de- velopment costs necessary to comply with applicable flood p lain regulations. ,, d (3) Despite the large amount oc undeveloped land, a number of factors Suggest that this limmiir land , will be needed for commercial oa a during the planning period. Fitst, the demand for additional goods and ser- vices ' population increases. ces will increase as Tualatin 's p® Greater concentrations of population and the relatively high incomes of the area's residents will support increa s- ingly s ingly r p ecialzed t ypes o f rf�tai1 and service establish ments. It should be noted that the adjoining com uuni lee of Durham, Ri ergrove and Lake Grove are predominantly residential in character, with relativel y little comr3er rowth of these cities Dial development. Consec�uez�t�valgabl.e commercial land in d for Tualatin, particularly near the Lower Boones Ferry Read will increase the demand with 15. Second, the Lower Boon as Ferro Roa interchange area is subject to continued develo am4tnt p�zes� se o,c its :accessibility' for freeway travelers sure because looking for gasoline, food, or lodging on their waY to and from Portland. And fr ally, the City is located adjacent to 3 of the region's major transP portation routes, the 6.010 Tualatin Development code 6.010 Interstate 5 and 205 Preeways a1114 ` the state Highway 217 Expressway: This access to the reainder of the region and' to the Willamette valley provides an opportunity for larger ®scale commercial and freeway'ox;iented developments. (4) It should be' fated that while most of Tualtl ati3,;° s residents work elsewhere, they will acre, likely work in the City if diversified jab opportunities are va'1.lable. Tualatin's su Pp Y 1 of con erci l land, will tys :s eventually create additional diverse :job opportunities and hopefully decrease ,xalatin( residents'' needs tc travel out, cf the comtaL pity to fir ' lobs (:5) As mentioned 400vef.the area north of the Tualatin River around the Lower. Booties Ferry .Road inter change is attractive for frees ay- brientea commercial develo pent m The present Comptehens ive Plan design sates most of the area as General Co mercial, and considerable development has occurred in the area singe .1970 a gowever, a t,au!ber of industrial firms are 1 ocated throughout the _stablished area as: a result Of zoria�at � prior \t® the �;�oop - tion of the existing Comprehext sive Plan, creating lard use conflicts between existing 'a d potential commercial deva- opment This Plan * expands commetcial use it 2-areas and Preserves for light industrial ' u$�e those Areas that are Already. committed to industrial development This was • • because was felt that the City had suffic±ent dine .a industrial land in the western Industrial District and. that rorimit to the freewa +�interchan �e ands the , iden' tail character of the area better lent itself to cam P y Y res vial Ise than industrial. use (6) As, much of the City's commercial land area is visible from the interstate ,5 Freeway and because all residents of Tualatin must page through a commercial area before reaching their it is i orwan that acs thetic de;igigt in oom ,c 1 areas be. sens,� mi�Jely handled. Generally, the desigm a common ty's commercial area def stes much of community' character. Fort.tnntel , he Ci t hs t an y s an M�.:�:F�itectural �evi,ew pru�ess end arY �'rb g ,..y r�o hel to r- event ina r py tae 1� en � ' P� P PF o t�,ate, unit Live Ilevel.opmr�nt, b4t tiuch more could be 40160 to increase .he quality of arohitecttral and landscape design in cam- ..,.. �new,cal areas ® because `much +�f 2'tbalat?.1'�''s c @n�eroial land Pted is visible' frc the f re�mwa,� ; or is adjacent esi to residential ses, hald etensve comm ercial 0s04, sqch,_ automobile truck, and machinery sales and rental, iuuld be tore appropriately lorited in the Cit 's western Indus -' trial District 'her a th ere are - relati vely large, b J' ualatin ;Den+elopment Lo d . `" h�'� s. a r K, to .'i have . ood ac unforest�, dr parcels of ._an 9 cess to f'reeways, and lan ercl,a1. uses would not affect the indtilltrl.al uses planned Lor this' area. (7) The Roamer e s Rest 'ccwmeroial area is unique in its character and history. ? It I tas served the needs of the traveling and recreating public for , many years and forms , a, part of the history of the Portland ':metropolitan area. It is appr.cpr'iate' to con'i inue the general ltAnd use pattern of highway and recreatiorz .; oriented commercial activity in this areas even including' the provision of housing in a miXed -use, type of development. ;' A, .Spec; iali.zed Planning District �is necessary to ;.accommodate ° the desired, commercial activity without, , allowing other uses that are not oriented either to the river, or the highway,. (ELI) As Tualatin , grows in terms . of residents and employees, and as, these individuals disperse more th .oughr out the 'City rather than concentrating near the downtown °.� - reas'ing demand for c ssiaaerci l is an ��r nm� area, there close :ro...:,nit: to the people. ,.A This demand is services in p Shopping primarily for day- to-eay shopping and service needs such as small grocery purchases, hair cutting and styling, etc. The creation of neighborhood commercial centers, through the use of the new Neighbo.rhood. Commercial '(CN) Planning District, will not only provide these services to the res- idents and employees, it w1,11 work to reduce traffic 'by -� eliminating trips to the downtown commercial areas. This p seen as having negative impact on the concept � is not see ng :any negs�ti � . . downtown area, as the types o.f goods and. services to be, p nature. It critical, provided are small and limited in�. nrtasre. .�t is however, that the ees e ghborha�d commercial u how:_,.... he design a�residental character and en-; be such, that they are o f harnc a r4ither than detract r from neighborhoods. [Sec. 6.010 amended by Ord. 592 »83, Sec. (251 , passed June 13; 1983.1 6.020 increase. sumpt Qng;e The following are general assum: titans u:.3ed to formulate this Plan: (1) Demand for t 1 City's commercial and C2) Lrg�sCaYe commercial enterprises will find Tualatin an increasingly attractive location . (3). The City will become commercial center serving a population much 'larger than its own. (4) Retail tom,ercial 'enterprises Will locate' Pri ear ply, in the City's downtown area ,, ./ • - I A • F 6.0 20 Tualatin Development Code 6 .040 (5) Freeway service establishments and offices will locate adjacent to the City's' f re'away interchanges or will be visible from the Interstate 5 Freeway. (6) Demand for hospital-related commercial development will occur sear Meridian Park Hospital. (7) The creation of residential and employment concentrations away from the downtown core will create the need for. neighborhood commercial centers. These centers are intended to provide for day -to -day shopping and er-- vice needs and are not intended to be serious competition ,with businesses in the downtown .( r•.ea r, (iSec. 6.020 amended by Ord. 59.2 -83 , Sec. 26, passed June 13, 1903.'] 6.030 objectives. uric following are general, objec- tives used to . �.de the development of this Plan: (1) Encourage commercial development. (2) Provide increased employment opportunities. (3) Provide shopping opportunities for sur- rounding communities (4) Locate and design commercial areas to mini- mtze traffic �.�ng esticn • and maximize access. - (5) Clontinue to utilize specific and enforce -m' able architectural an landscape design standards for c : mercial' eievelopm+ent. (6) Encourage, developers to consider solar access when designing c ®mme: cial �evela ent pro j ecta. . (7) Locate lend - extensive commercial uses:, such as automobile, truck and machinery sales and rental, in the City's Western 2ndustrial District. (8) Provide for limited and carefully designed d neighborhood commercial centers. (Sec. 6.030 amended by • Ord. 592 -83, Sec. 27, passed June 13, 1983.3 6.040 planning cs.,..irtuagrsdail..22Angiairat r i ct Q► o jam. . This section describes the purpose of each commercial district. (1) Office strict (C ®� . f ice Commercial. Planning District To provide areas suitable for Professional Jff ice uses ad j i.'tcent to or across from residential areas. Restaurants maly be allowed by conditional use permit when designed as an integral past cf a major office comp P lex. It is the office developirent ict to provide for o .. intent of this di�si°r '9 ranging in ; size from small buildings with on.. or two ten 4r L. rre fa .040 Tualatin K Development Code `, :1 ants to large comp].czes housing business headquarters offices. In the deign of deveaopr.,rent . ii t�iis 'district,.. care shall be taken to Preserve •sigAi,if scant natural re-- sourcer and i.o provide extensive :perimeter landscaping, - especially adjacent to residential -areas and streets. (2) .Neighborhood Commercial Planning District (CN) . To provide .locations for commercial uses, within close proximity to residential areas.: zt is 'to provide' for opportunities to serve the needs 1Pf,residens for con venience shopping and services.; such uses will oe limited to- :prof ess.ional offices,, services, and retail trade, that Y-' - y needs of the comm are oriented to the da to da commercial ne residential neighborhood. Neighborhood erc al uses are 'intended p n Should serve to need to be e��estrian ��..i.��ed and s reduce automobile trips and, energy; consumption. ' 'The pur�' P004 is also to assure that Such development is of a seal €i and design so that it is compatible with the residential environment and is an enhancement to neighborhood areas. St is not the purpose of this district to create large- scale corm eircial facilities that will ComPete'vit't similar uses, such as 'l .urge grocery or 'department stores, located in the d�titown area. ' 3) Rcreational..Comaercial Planning .lstrict �« valuabAf tbesRoamer s (CR) To recognize the Unique and p 9 : scenic, cu�.. alp and historic ch racter of and Pa ' Rest area lIcs tur �- tee betw�,ers the Tualatin aoffic Highway (99W), north of the htghway's,.intersection with Tualatin Road, It i3 intended to preserve • that area by win and encouraging related uses. t�zat allowing g 9 traveler �oncthe highwa or that Are are oriented to the., 9 Y . , oriented toward and relate well With the riv‘.�. (4) Central Commercial Planning District tiCC) To Prov7: - . ' downtown, s range of retail, prof )nal de areas _for. a fill ra and service uses of the ki� usually , found in areas b pedest r. � � Ci, and cul- a P �' iaa.,s. � uric, social reds �atroni�ed � ,... , M tions that serve th +' general communit also tut, x are a a . arc riat al Tune The Ce ►stral Commercial alaun].ng _D�istriv� -� is almP e . ,,, ost entirely wit,n n the, dewntOWn p i.on of the turban enewal• area. The urban Renewal Plan contains extensive development policies and design standards that apply to . . - Policies and stand , �3ct' Thes area are inrce this district. t �'. , to help create a village atmosphere in the downtown area. - Y g n. certa n aromas o lbiultiple Tamil housin i.s 'aPP�ropriate i� this diatr ict, as specified in the Urban Renewal Plan r. .010 Tualatin Development Code and "general *:, for ease 'of understainding.' The,',light. Indus- .trial uses are arranged in the Plan to , be res- idential areas to pin .mite environmental conflicts as Bauch: as po3sible. Because industrial processes change rapicdly clue to new technology iii is also intended that Some dustrial'' uses proposed in the gener ;,l use Category may be appropriate in ''a lighter use area, if ' properly designed ,to. mitigate adverse environmental 'impacts. (8) While most of Tualatin's industrial land is located between Tualatin Road and Avery' Street in the wes -r' tern pot ion of the pity t there are stall amounts of dustrial land located in the northern portion of the City , and lying on either side Of' :the' Low Boones Perry Road / er ' Interstate 5 Freeway interchange.' The. Plan has main' tained, as industrial use, those areas that are now com- mitted tol industrial development. Zawever, some land 'pre= vously 'zoned ,, ,, r ai has been converted to a �Cammer- ndust` �, dial designat; on b►+��ysa.use ©f ache residential character of the area and pr'oximi i' to the freeway. The industrial. land in this area is:vesignated on the Plan'as lightcH industrial because off.; the area's proximity to .commercial and residential areai. 7.015. , This section' describes', the histor y and nature of the Indus -� trial Ylann in g Area 4 (1) TI. ndus rtal Planning Area is ®sated in , rtion of Washin ton County end immedi- the southeastern Po � g y p p n of thce"ai�f wall 9tel west of the dev�elo eo ortio atin It is within the :Urban Growth Boon ,� anne$d.: to Tualatin in Li vember, 19132, except' for a, few ndiidual,parcels. b. (2)1 Tha Industrial. Pl�..�isg � tea is served y Pacif 3.c Highway (Highway 99 T) as a direct route to Post- t also .s tied dire' ale .- y od�Road, ar�nd�TB tin5herwo land. I �, and in_it. , ectly by Tualatin Road ,erman Road, to 'ante tat � 5 with direct ties to the', east vi; Intersta ,e 2 . It is Grossed by 'Southern Pacific and ifurlington N©i�ther0. • -af broad 1 Ines. (3) The lies in the rel .tively l area f at lands of the Tualatin Valleyo `itch far�wlgnt scathe fed throughout. Although the area is currently rura cnd soh atur creasing p essvr for development . 3's -. .. !,, ins.. �. occurrin n' Thus is A the ocx�str; ction of several 9 �' a�ot.d b►y. t ', new industrial uses within the phani ng area curing the last 10 years and the rapi4growth ► in ::s rial' use in the western portio "s of thti city. • Q w AC I .7% OF 10 CAN DERUITLIZ AC % 3.9% OF SUBAREA VACANT/UNDERUTILIZED AC , ,L IS 5.1% OF TOTAL VACANT/UNDERUTILIZED f:C AC IS 100% OF SUBAREA VACA UNDERUti IZEO: CG 0411ACICIEPIZIIIE/SAIITO & ASSOCIATES OREGOil (003)?24-9070 WASHI.N.P1DP,112(*45110,05 .: MACICENZIE INGIFIZERItla INCORPOPATSU oREat#i (to) gt4-966p VOSHIIVC31`014 (290) 4150430 • • =,r SF.rt1TTLE: V N't ' PLOOR ' lose WC6ttR,(4 AVENl* SlCATTLEy AtA6M■NOTON.06104 -1023, (2Ot '4¢!4 -3t 39 A1W.EY, SCMUBE A . PAFrrNCA0I14I16 or 1■O1;tst1ONA1. CO$/OAAT ELEVENTH F'1;OOR 121 S.W. MORF4IS0 STREET, Y. PCFITLAND, ORtGON 17072 64 •,' (503) 2a8•399 TELEX: 32.1037,(LEX SEA) CABLES LEX- SEATTLE' FAX: (5031 226 -0230 PLEAS REMY TO PORTLI,ND ,OFFICE ugus t 31 1990 Gerald Edwards, Mayor City of Tigard City Hall 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard P. G1 Box 23397 Ti;gard, Oregon 97223 Re: S>pieker P an/Zone Chan e WASHjNGTOM O G�. WTH FCC' "OR ' C�t)O PGrbMIAC' ORCET WA5HII iGTON, 20007'. (?O2)4G5 7060 Dear Mayor Edwards: has continued inu ed its l a�� As you 'know, the City Council, a consideration of the Spieker Partners plan and zone change request to its September 17, 1990 meeting. This request came before you on August 13, 3, x990 wi th a 'recommend atson f: r. om the Planning Commission to approve the p lan and zone change request from Industrial Commercial. your August 13 meeting, i t was impression tha t t he City; Cou�cll would have benefitted from certain clarifications by the Planning Commission regarding its ;decision to recommend approval of these requests to your Council. We think it. may he helpful to the City nun ii to invit�a ColrimisSionChairman Moen "to your ,meeting 'to share with you the 'L nkins4\ of the 'planning' Commission well as to be available for ncil may have 11 any questions the Cou atwe to tie Commies recosnmendelt on. would re pe y ° We Ctfu y request,' the Ma oL to invite Chairman ':Moen to your September ; 17,'' ,1990 meeting. ' Thank you for your consideration. , Derr truly yours, GAfVEY , SCHUBERT & BARER GS'H /ikt X1137 -00100 cc: fir. Jim Eddy Spe Air • St;n H,ngham tans. Stoup d Mu 'phy, Commul,nity DevelopmPn - -Cep; th` Lid'en, Planning Director Ta is Remis City` Attor.ne • r Gregory S. Hathaway er Partxsers lrec n. U ; err Offer ' f the 'City P1 anni hg staff) and I revi a wedx'�the Pl am chanide dockets fyri3m 1984 to' present. 'he. fob lowing applications, � included n Con e`rc ial zoning CPA 12 -85 .. `IP to CG (2.8 ac.) at the intersection o CPA 0986 ..; I L 'to ' CG , (Caren Center, denied CPA 06- 86/87 -0I R25 to CG (Albertson °s)-- appruyed CPA 88 -01 0 . R3.'5 to CG (Triangl a area) - approvkl CPA R3.5 to CC (Triangle area approveo cc: Jerry Offer, Ke1 t ae - City: of Tigar Jim Eddy - Spieker Partnilrs Stuart Bingham - Binghar Investments. lic.hoarirkg was clOsed.,' ▪ Consideration I by Council: . Council agreed September 10 .0ould be the date E)et for a joint meeting with City Council and the Planning • RESOLUTION iO. 90-51 A IIES21)LEITION TO INITIATE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IAMENDMENT FOR THE AREA., PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED 1 AS , THE PRESIDENT'S PARKWAY ' URBAN RENEWAL DISTRZCT. ' C.:(.1unci.lor Johnson moved, and Councilor Eadon Seconded to adopt Resolution 90-.51. k. Motion carried by a UllarliMOUS vote of Cotncil present. 7 PUBLIC gighltOIG • CIMINO'S Z011'.4oi-oboi _ A request for approval of a ComprellnsiVe Eiln Amendment to change the land use designation from Light Industrial to General Commercial and to change the zoning designation from I-L to C-G. JU)CATION: Between SW 72nd Avenut% and Interstate 5 and south to the Oregon Business Park (WCTI4 231 13 AD, Tax Lot 1700) a. Public hearing '''''7`11s ▪ 'Declarations Or Challenges: There were none. c. Stibmation by Couflunity DeVelopment Staff: Senior Pi.rinneril Keith Liden displayed' maps showing location Of the subject property,', and the burroUnd areas and their Comprehensive Pl&n designations whic zoned ELight' �ndus.,Li ial w , "`He �03 � ao! n !:which" are` a comb'ina said staff's original r co ndat 'on `way based on probable. adverse impact can tref f ic; studies and ' testimony reprementative indicated there , would not . be ao adverse i zoning, were changed to conaercial'. discussing ' policy 5.1'.1 se Or Tigard' inventory ,of industrial sand " '' is and not expected to increase. Seni r not, mistake in 1983 when the ,plan way► reu sed did not find a change ' in circumstances object area. He discussed the PlaiMing Commission recoir enc at .on , which favors approval of the .proposal. He reviewed the information in the T)ackets and advised that staff • recoRinended denial of the proposal. There vas discussion about the. adjacent P ro �a �erty ;_locat in Tualatin. Senior ' F � Planner also Blaborated traffic impact issue and tile studies wnich`were aubmitt to the Dtaonin , Cowmissic►x °° Public Testimony Propvrients aLans Stout, Manning Image - for McK+n -- a scoiatea o P. O. Box 69039, Portland, intr ►c ice consultants, legal counsel, develops ani property owner of the subject prop rt 'mow ` II reviewed the presefitatian made Commission at the July 10;11990 viee t with the traffic study. He brief , deacr , ;F ibod � ri existing traffic problems anc the, gg sts measures to solve those problems. yC'' lair. Stout addressed a lane ; al ocation recapped cbltments ' made by , Pl nning , President Moen supporting the propo "" aim e i �..ent based on a Chan e ,in �c�►arac CITY a CIt /METING �MII1' Councilor Johnson expressed- concern; ,gout impact , on the dumber' of ' obs and level off" day "'would:be - aav'ailable -tip: `` 4 the- zoning ►ere uged t Industrial to Commer°ial`. fir. Stout addressed this issue. ]fie 'discussed possibility of building,, a hotel on the site. suggested policy 5.1..3_ 'does not specify =what; t of jobs or salaries.` ase to be generated. John ,"angle i wio was - involved iii' market research study concerning t to site i advised thoy at typically ndu� ttrial. property aver g : one emplee for every 500 sR, are feet of space; 'whereas wit � reta .l .: p rt ►4 i.t is about one enpl,oyee for every 200 o 230 square feet of sp!a+ce ands c��nsequent.y,;', ..here would , jobs availablet if ` 'the' site were, zoned:- !omneroial. land and Corme . j 1 r there was discud,�s on about the amount of Indus aria. r+�i` �.l land currently ' in �'iga�dl m; Engle explained the process involved in the stud and market analysis. There was discuss �' o Plan, and how adresse ' Commerci ropes t ... in. com _ tition w; regarding e� Comprehensive P F y Pe tl Downtown Tigard. o' unity Develop ni Director reviewed t ie reaso staff recommended dellyittg the applicant's requ+ a He pointed out that although . the, traf is rid appeared to be no problem, .' this WAS . not ev den that a zone change was in order. The Policy 5.1 issue can be argued ` eitrier 'way with: regards eln1210Y1lent' opportunitiea. oftcced by Conr arcial as opposed to Industria].. land. Ik. said an important issue involved ven o zoned Indutria1, which is in liii*ited• S'2ip1y should not be rezoned as Coiflmercial, He ad tesao the question of whether ere •had been a ,,cbtangia„ in character 1,11 the area. .H e'lliecussed the adjoining' p):operty afld the narby 4.;.opertir in Tualatin. He advised the becansii era is not enough err.f.ilence in favor or changer the staff recommended laving the ComprelienEiive Plan as it is. Mayor Edwards e)cpresSedpancern about the changing character in the earir. prepet-ty Tualatin and 1)urliam. He discussed the employment possibilities for the site and the inventory of Commercial and clndustrial land in Tigard. He noted there .'‘Yas no input from the NPO or CPO, and the recommendations from staff and th Planning *Commission are not in agreetent. He indicated a • prefezence-to take more time to,-study the issues before making a decision. Public. hearirag wtis closed. Consideration by Council: o j Councilor Johnson compared employment opportunitieE: in coiUnorcial and industrial jobs favoring industrial as more sustainable and higtler Paying ' emi)loyment. She e)cprazi$ed concern about long-term planning and suggested taking into account " the possibility that the economy may take a domward turn in the near future. She said she was in favor of denying the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Zone Change. Councilor Eacion donunented on the need to protect Tigard's 76r.dustria1 land. She noted the unique ' qualitiem of the subject property and discussed the change in citcilmstaraces; in nearby properties. She suggested an 'argument could be made that a 'claange / in character has occurred. She indicated ' concern 11.1 i i about the quality of the input fromt the Planning Conanission. She said she did not find ample reason Planner Lide.n and the applicant's legal c a either 14011", without More iiri°rIa'ati°na, ilt.nel:e was litoayodrenroYdwthtahreedszzooanndeeViChange; WaanssdnostheOrseaPiada eighd eo*)evuotide discusSion , with City's Legal Counsel, ' Senior , \ _ , . , support change a long as proc dent would not be set. Edwards _ ,_ m cis's cc)olicit, MEETXNG 1,11NuirEs ... Apatisix 13, 1990 -'' is.liCAS, 9 Greg Mati4* a a objection -Waiving the 120, a 'order to ic !,.t,more..'informati reqIe3ted oPtr.014174'. of new data which, the receive. Mayor Edwards specified ' data , with to peraentageS f land left ii the City s Industria:L base as cOmparetif to the percentages of he Commercial base; and he asked for initOrmation.. indicatng what percentage of 'radjacent Pioperties is Commercial. There wits discussion rcondeixing raw undeveloped land and de,iveli.oped land", in two zone designations.. Xt"watg agreed that tArtlnent infOrmat,on woUlti be provided to the ,AppliCatit for study ,pziocr to the next .hearing date. The Mayo' Continued the hearing -t0 the City. Council Meeting h: of September 17 '1990 • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Counc3.1 went into Executive Session ikts' '9125 p.m. -A,Older-the ..provisions of ORS ,192.660 .(1) (d), (e)o (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, cm=ont and r.tendilig litigation issuea. Elizabeth A. Newton, Deputy City Recorder eX2ranscriotion by Ellen Fox N CITY OF TIGARI' ;'oR:,, ; I coUNCXL Aagx AGENDA OF: Auauet . 13, 199 ISSUE /AGENDA TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment ' .90- 0004:fZo:ne Chancre _, 90 -0n02, ker Partners) Di'lFT HEAD . OK CITY ADMIX OK IL AAA DATE SUBMITTED: lkaguitit 1.1990. PREVIOUS ACTi3ON: P a nin Coemissix on hearing; n on � Ju�r 19�t� r PKE} ►ABED DY 1 ' ferry ,41rlek`' . REUSED; B3 Inewilmiumssmsxs Xasusssa um sss smemamsssarnsssssssamsssFend smskasss =m*dasasasaOprtsfaams POLICY :ISSUE City industrial land. .base to tallow ' for additional development,, C£t, reduce its developable development., The proposal seeks to redesignate 6.6 acres /from a Plan de signati fm of Light Ind:a:trial awl zoning of I-L to the General Covviitercial Plan designation and C-G zoning? The parcel is bounded by, I -S to' the east, SW ' 72nd Avenue t, the 'west, Lower Boones Ferry Road to tip. south,:, and the Oregon Business Park to the north. aaca aasssssssat ssrasstassasrasessacss acsasseesssasssssssssssssassssss�assssasassaisssssasssssssssssss � iIF�Itc _�e't'I ®Id SUMMARY The Planning Division issued a. report to the' Planning Coanaiasioa 'recommending: denial of the a licat 4 due primarily ;to concerns ;related tin congestion at the intersection of SW, 72nd Avenue, Bridgeport Road, and SW Lower, yoneg, Ferry Road. The City of Tigard Engineering .Division,. C,+.'=;, ` of Tualatin, CitR7 Durheaa, and the Oregon 'State Highway Division .also raised concerns with respe;t to potential traffic' impxct® that tight result tweitt, comme trial .evelopment of the site. in.' add.ition, staff raised concerns that the' proposed redeeiguations would replace one of the few undeveloped prime industrinlily zoned parcels in th City with commercial zoning, when there appears to be a `'.eurplue of commercial Staff also was unable to find that a, change in circumstances ra ffecting 'the parcel or evidence 'of a mistake in the original Pldtn and < zoning designiations exist. Srxhenciuent tt.� the original Cauance . of the Staff report, . tht applicant' a engir* ere :further analysis ofj t .+ r d re � . several rel c ti.bi..e .ant ®r��a1��.on an p _paL d' p �iminary de ignsr fr`�'c iaaprovem~rnt AA4rf. lie nt��rsec'tiou;`" and conducted, identified potential ''improvement f .nar�rsing mecshani'e!pa�. The Highway' D .visioa repreaentatiya coaamonted at the commi,aeicn hearing basted upon the . f indinga In the additional traffic analysis, the` Divisive . wads nit opposed to the redesig at g nati n ,this titre as had belen reported yin the staff report. thr;, .• City Engineering: , Division• a , upon the Highway Division' a concerns, the Engineering'. - Division n�,a longer .recaaemeniis denial. The pri ary issue tf lative to this application now .'be whether y ?- �_ p : to allow' for ads City. �.o re, -rice the �welo ahl®' industrial �.a�� d kaase additional cow:eroial den' to nt. The Planning CoanO.eaion rev Sewed the applicant's proposal and " he Planning Di n, ieion Staff report alo, g with hearing public testimonny sn the proposal. at the Commie aion t' e July 104, 1990 meeting. The P1annin; Commission rec��amende app oval qu e . ,g .. and C' G' tonin. designation. of thee. requested �enoead,.ommC ieeionas di cu eieA sand findiz�� et are attar Minutes susmaarisi:ng th a s:id====mma ommusi ssa minus mmtemaeasssssssssssasssssassssera assesszse*ammimaissssmm male r insssas -sin s ALTERNA IVES CONSIDERED 21. ip rr� we the re N e9tec Coanercial 'inrrluad a t. Den y the application t e reby retaining ,the: rial idn�g � r'at�gensa.gtnibatnisa. b s : a�ssmeasasmmssaasr�a�asM- ssss::a4xaassfsaasss:sss ._ scssataes�wtacacresasssriaazassssssssas� ►�a�ssie�aaisisaeatasa�as asasss FXSCAL IMPACT None. .. lit== it sea illiassa ==m=matmsxssas acimm s amilli sc- gssuseasaewitit= tisi�ai a`•es mms— assn -asas assns SUG4,ESTBD` ACTLO! Deny the request and dirge: staff to prepare a co�raceapondfg resolution:- el I o w a n s C SEED x , r x 1 1 tro ,sa► r f,�,. at cn't'�:re.ly' a with ><ati, 't', of`thi statt that, .' -, uh, 1 focused on ];,tee just `.a little ��.t •' than parcels the industrial parcel less l than 4 `, is i t economic ; unit principally, anci I :'guests - I,' don't ' agree with t. >at. we at leri t right at the t I'm 'u ,inciir ecl too' stay with the existing zora�' 'i' plan. I think, ' I c3ciri't know wh± all was on the C° sion when Welt,' had a ,a project down there on 72nd, a completed pl project that was in inddstrial eras an2 I. think . we left that in an ixdustrial zone. That shopping ca tileY , uh, Leverett: ???: That's a lent we've had With industrial park zc . probably have o 'as we, itt: That e$ alt, I'll Y�'o�► mm ;, That ' s all for right not ter. Peter son? Well 'I think at this point in time T pretty much have to •agro believe that uh,; there's ?° fs salotof3 with staff's I ground on the other side of tit's freeway end I remily &not think that it inf'xmoes uh, c raarga .. a+. tt>e,i; on this tbiS*patticular ,piece of grrAnxi. So I will supsprt Staff's reconmendation of denial.° ???: tom„ Comissioner Saporta? traffic tarsi , the uh„ the fah, . � t l d�'t Samoa sang �. � �rat.3.�s think this project would uh, really adv rsely inpact ! -„iing no matt�.r what goes er e�r�t. 3n . ttnex ; �' ''use conditions tO have pretty the situation. that I'm iwrezt.ling . with is whe ther indeed t Change circumstance which would grant the uh, zone & inn, the nercial c ela x ent is al the east ; side o'; the. freeway, ' r� .. I view that as a barAer, nct as a something t hat is Iriviait e J. that can be '' over. It 1s a true bc'ier`b tixer.r to a,. a bit of the re is c�.te south there if you o th�h north and possibly `:to the tsyst , um, thi st ll , light in ustr Ul I just iav+en't mY d interested int hear one= ha VG 1' ???: ConiniKeinner likIssler? , Pass L1m, ir.toicing ai'„, the traffic circulation told the justificaion for dlarriinti the crae, lau, I think, as far as, uho an the lake °mc . side of the Ireasrety, or the Tua".1.4 tin side, um, do vie, want to j'ilist add to the pzdolem just because Geor‘r did it, iLtx1 cite another ccitalercial ars,. on the other side. I do Itzlow that I drove that area for to yeains ani Mr., Mr. ?? is correct, there is a stacirig prolalemi The stadcing exists betwesn these tttso areas. I have a little bit of difficulty in the t:rrZfic inwt area of saying that the retail, the ot..mloirietticn of retail and hatel uttil.d rt be that nuch more than Itl, and I'm vicridering because in a hotei, , situation, people teril to occie and go c3nce or twice a day, aril they:re riot, other pewit) are rtot caning in for a various amagrit ' of imagoes to impact 72nd Ult, I think there is todi really, I think with the cotorciirgition with all the agerici.eg;, for doing a iyasSible , resTioraal eituatiori I do agree there needs to be inproveriarrL in • area titre it c;ould be made loattert. but it is a .2satter of all the jurisdf,cticris gettlim,together.,arid I'm just varoriderim at this time that a zoning WI change on this might be a little bit too Immature for where the area is rm. Caninissiorler agres. that; the ah, traffic issue' probably there Would not that— " comercidi than with the ,induste bote,i rj �J her .usas were a11d , 'diallge'vfere' ° 61 irt4UStrial park,- I don't, see: would ,.be, that wpositiori to ing, castragoi11. 0 made ut3'10Y"Ildrid Yet.' 4 ' I Ah, Ozamnissioner Boone? , A , ;fell it appears; that uh, rt‘,4- ire as the m•&aner, that ,we l'ave a iii6;te'of JXKlUStri3l prerLy Silrix3Undecl 074#1411 pits. and other lazthicipal,itiet that think is a conmelftizil area . Ai I look at it outside of freedays and the gravel pit, therevi; noLhing, but" carineroiall The =nut of traffic, i do pzt fee]. is a .'problem • bemuse there are ralw different t-ipes . i..*Idustrial. 'and ittny different types e ozatharcial,' Scale genescate xtiore than others mean, 1 know, I'S/Pe be involved in same of these.' tliingse and tIle amolunt of traffic varier", ccnsi2 4.1—cibly between *dinar, things that are permitted in each rtxm... I realize it's on the edge of Tigard, bit 17 don't if we elmuldi be looking at this as' Tigard, 'ignoring 'what eiss Owego TUalatin (km, or say hey, this is a whole area that norrally will 4letmist aroutd an intersection off ©f freeway. It ITIA)Pens a13. ilia t. We used to 1:ui14 things in strips, now ;le ii1d thismi , in Circles around freeway 'aCoess. while it isn't good, it sure is handy. Ard 1 cant not see a Pmblera 11'1 doing' 'caurnercial.' ex'aelot. the fact it wi.11. IprOhah- ly 'make, Bingham mare mtney, and ttwt: 1,c1 be against. But other than that... that's about it. Mr well 2: guess frau w starrIpoint, loolartff at this, um, / think its significant, a c:oupleA of things are Significant, 1.2‘1' looldng at this property. One, is that indeed it , you Clir3,.ven,- d�f7fl thre man/ tiii•es„ and di, been in 'the 4;1740 el.' „lane ::%-4.itirtg to go to iii s People, Um, 1, 1 in1c thc the till- I think, it is siv:aa.,ioatit. - I don't think I properties that have develored around there a*,itt cbarige, aC think there is a cliange in diaractei! of area carmemial area. 1 ttl.init that the pexe„hrty itself*isr isolated from oti't othir& thilitic it it, the edge of it. 'iuk dcret think it t•iiii,artNitly .1nract-our. available irdt141', lard. Obviously cerLtlUv * IfJotild go cway from irxiustria.l. land but cal tht ' 111‘ CIS ccemertial development with lmou, the ci..*e prcodinity tO the free.ay, unicitta in that sense, and uh, there isn't ,too that. I' think 'we'Ve'06t, a very good, goc industrial dvel..clansot 'to the nditti; developinents. I initially Was thin,idlig abt goOd Ccaprollise bit damaissiesner LeVterett , :11 PLANNIt&I OlitESSICti MINUIES CILY 10, 1990 , I t we sex %e, that t w+' � s f� fcr ' el�? 1r � .ty Council `:tact approval Ccaprehensim P1 'a and sane recamendatim for zone'(target. 9 have any coalitions, itions, : I moire we ,should W And t%en bad ie cond • Lions "'that t e u stet ass.. Of, page 7 of . the uh, adaitional tree :La Uas 1- 4 1 aY13.1 ly 'si.�. i r.; it m 4 would` gu�;s , ' I think the only thing l.:r.ituLd "d1a'ge •;, that the, ' it , says, w say het t the =dim ma r i lity of site and the ' LID show a 9.3% of the inpravetnent omit traffic impact, uh, I think that's la little matter mom. to , maxim • , I would like dome of fact, I would say, , bit I don't }arrow if that's fair to the applicant Maaybe ' we stead just strike that line altogether. L i ?? (finale): Negotiated between.. . a.•• Well nr].I Y that's what • • • so I would just strike that las t sentence a3_ t<ke. so that's ; the Leveret, it's your: co .a La us Did I leave you nmta? I I'm titre tion Iindings Plus the. cxYt with of the on of suggested by MP-- sentence of item 4. bard figure established? i ! \�: • li Well brad figure is real]y, I think, sash, th�a aw has volunteered as a good faith corn...rbutucn. Ib necessarily, a minimum bit it 's a... that wale arrived analysis analysis of the ; 9.3% which was feeling of a czntribut is n traffic to the interssctiaa. And as �.ar as t a just, you know, think that's a good faith effort.t rl we can play with that. I guess we can do anything � 'het dari't think it, s �fais to do anyt rhg. H vol. of fuhds �` the .. e, it e may i.`i x more t tii that's swathing eta lae d� � , h�i�t elf a� Y ' Parties, not for ryes: 'l' 1l second t nat.:ian. LJ NNI G ectiMISSION !tlalUl .' 10 199 4: .�h Cemmi ssi oner Fessl er commented that the mono l; houl d stow NPO' f3 i nstea of . UPO IPB : for Robert Root. Senior Planner' Liden cl ar i fieo , for being a property owner or business awner., a� ',well , as being a resideng ei g pope Y Commissioners the requirements for aPPolotment to an 61'0, which inch ommi ssi oner Fyre moved and 'Commissioner ecammendations isal er seconded to approve the' Motier carried by unanimous vote of. Commissioners pretent. . PUBLIC HEARINGS 1k�;? 4N� %SPxE ........,.I�..... ..r, ,..!: han the i - r y f I 4 request or' adpproval of a Comprehens i e Plan ' Amendment land use designation from Light Industrial to General `,Ccamercial and t chango the zoning designation from I -L to C-4, LOCAL SON: €.6 acres lacatel between SW 72nd Avenue and, interstate `r: and south of the Oregon Business Park (WCTM�2s1 13AD, tax lot 1700 ) , II Senior Planner Liden described the subject Pr(r)arty and presented a chap showing the ,location and zoning designations Of surrounding treas.:, He reviewed the history 'of' the request, stating ,that applicants postponed the Original hearing scheduled for April 3i,, '1990,.; to allow more time study traffic issues pertaining to* the proposed development, ►ie advised that I staff found' the proposal is consistent with 411 majori t► ,of the Comprehensive Plan policies and relevant State goals; hrwevlr, there are concerns about policies relating to traffic and transportation. 'He also said Comprehensive Plan Policy 5.1.1, relating to economic k,iiversity,. is not satisfied because the area is primarily Industrial.. ,'N.2 reviewed the items in the packet, which h were - g reconanen'dation, for Memo from Jerry Offer summarizing n staffs denial Memo from City Engineer Letters from C'hty of Tualatin, `Wazhi ngton Coun Oregon State Iliiljhway Division - - Planning ni n n Department Staff taff Re ort AaP l icat's narrative ' - March 1990 Traffic Analysis an d P" Study June 1990 Supplemental Traffic Analysis - Commissioner Boone advised that he has had business, dealings with Bingham in the past, but he said he would be impartial in making a decision APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Tri -Mot, an Laos stout, Plaini ng Manager for Mackenzie Saito Associates, P.O. Box 69039, presentation and ,�, out) � rye�i the format of their pry akin , He distributed Copies ies introduced tthe individuals who would , be spe g � of an aerial Photograph . ._ .".+ _ ' 1 of the subject area. li�E .{Mated their pro Asa is to change the Comprehensive Plan and zoning f rcr�i Light Industri a, (1 4.) to General-Commercial (C -G . PLANQf AIG CO ' ' SSION MINUTES - JULY 10, 19 it) J ►GI Stout a ssed the traffic and transpor on issues.' He reviewed Vie. original traffic study (see packet) which 'indicated; therq ;Was -a functional problem of the intersections of 72nd :' and ' Lower ,Boones Ferry Bridgeport Road and the Westside ramp, termi real fry. _the freeyaay. He. said the problem was a multi- jur.i.sdictional one, including .Tilgard,` Tualatin, Washington County, Oregon 'Department of Transportation (ODOT) and Tri 44et. , He stated .there a were two meetings lla'i th reprtseiaat1 Yes ,,from these jurisdictions to discuss : and ,study ties trcf fir, problem. He suggested that re -zoni snag would help .bring about a 'solution. to the traffic problem. John Ingle stated : he is the Director of Economic ar.d le arket Research for, Palmer, Broth and Pietka, 50 SW Pine, in Poriarid. He reviewed the major findings, of his analysis, which are, included in his re (see packet) . Based on the current inventory, of Commercial and Industrial lands and market demand, he .suggested that the highest and use for this property is Commercial/Retail as opposed to Industrial. Dave Larson stated he i s a registered 'prof ess or�a1' engineer with . Mackenzie Engineering, 0690 $►W Bancroft, ,Portland. He discussed the traffic and transportation risues uti' a wai map to describe` the current primary traffic movement at peak haiurs. He sad the purpose of the second level stud,, was to 'evaluate the .effect of additional impacts on the two critical intersections west of ''i -5 at the freeway offuramps and at S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. Bridgepor ;. Raade, 1 He indicated that the key i ssue i s the stacki ng d I stance between these two intersections. He discussed ,potential days to improve traffic conditions. Out of four pc si Ole' scenarios, ''Al terneti pie l D" was chosen by a :majority' of the g ®vernnoent agencies who participated' in the Ju ne 1990 Meeting. concept Would be to move the intersection th existing traffic P atterr, improve and i ncreases area available, to Tri -Met. e ThlS plan would' requi re !*ui 1 di ncj a retaining Wall , and i t it estimated the cost' would be $918,0(10.''' There As further discussion to cl ari fy traffic pr ibl ems and the proposed methods for financing the transportation 'project. Lans Stout s p oke again reviewing the technical criteria for 'meeting code .and policies in the Comprehensive Platt. Greg Hathaway, Attorney, 121 S.W. wlorri son .01 reet,' Portland, represents Sp e e r , . v sed that appl i can% demonstrat ed c o lianc e ' i with t hclegal cri teri a He sugge ;ted there were thr reasons to re -zone the subject part el d on, 1oation; itnis good p *arming policy • Y 9 pP �i us ti f i n a ►oval . (1: 1 based 6 (2) tr��tffi' c robl j p ) E y xists which tan by perative' effort 'of jurisdictions and appl i"cant together; and (3) d b coo � Lie sot ve . g appl icant can demonstrate, that all applicable legal criteria have been n satisfied jUstifying a Cctoreiiensive Dlari and Zone Change amendment. Tom Schwab, Transp v tation Analysis Planager for ©►regon Highway 'Div 1n, Region 1, indicated tr' a Highway Division identified„ the intersection a,_ S: W'. 72nd Avenue and S. �'. Dri dgeport Road aas a probl p e+n and Plat ft on the regional plan in 1984. He explained dtscri 0001 s s sp ,,,.nsi 1 t for P al s stet v r th i 9n y � � He `resenul d oaf' Wo which hat.' been ,done .and i s .. 1 tinned for Phase 1 of the .. ..., etch i ntersection � area to 'widening, n . p to a xk e #ng and merging changes and dual PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - 3ULX 10, 199 1- left turn 1a that are lanned. He' in his =is eot`;a `10 ,solution. He suggested the applicant's , plan Sc eie D =would offe feasible long -term solution to the exi sti n9 traffic\ probl o Senior Planner Li den responded to que'stions from Comma sstoner�s regard 'ng the staff recen endation. He. discussed' . the. 'change ' `i n cl atracter "`, 1 saue and explained the importance of provl'ding al-diversity of *;possible: 'business types' that could be acco m odated i ri the..;City., a He expressed* concern that the amount of land desi gnated as' :Indus.trial it 1'imited, and will not increase, but there wilt be' c►ianges in the amount of . Coasmerc i al and Residential land. PUBLIC HEARING C 0 D o Coami si oners Castile, Leverett and PeterS0111, expressed ressed inclination to stay ;with the exi' stin g Comprehensive Pl an an d zoning, supporting staff's 's recommendation on to dew the v•equest. o Commissioner Suporta was concerned about the ; "change i n character issue, stating that he supported staff's findings. o Commissioner Fessler discussed t► a traffic issue, stating zoning chan9e. might be premature Comm.' ssi ones; F`yer expressed concern about the 1 imi ted amount of 'Industrial property currently in, the City. Commissioner Barber stated' she did not find the traffic issue a problc , but would d like to have more i nformation a 1. Commi ssi oner Boone commented that he could not see a valid reason for maintaining the area as Industrial, noting that it is normal for Commercial/Retail areas to develop around freeway!' access intersections. President Moen suggested; the subject ;, property, i s rel ati ve 'y i'sol ated from the other Ind cstrial land sites. He c*�ented that there Would nol be a sl yni fi cant impact on the City by losing this one parcel of PPo , g pP q Industrial 1 end: He favored su rt n a 1 #cant s rye oast for change of zoning with restrictions impoed to address traffic problem. verett seconded oner F er to►. y � � b Cr;mmi ssi .y .� Mots nn h Comma ssi over LF� recommend � � ,City CounC , � t ®C .� ,� ,,� to CPA QO -0404 ,and ZQN g0 -0a02 With, w H respect' si to goal 12 and ,P1 an Poi Icy 8.8.1 With conditions irt�posed. �i .. fi ndi ngs there would, d not be gni ficant impact. of l stacki ng or traffic in, either tag e, which 'is supported by the testimony of Tole Schwab from 'ODOT. With respect to item 4 , Pol cy `5:l i t was found: that a onorale diversity i s not 'adversely affected by' t: evel opi fag this particular •. parcel . 'Conditions tc be 'unposed` upon appl icantw time of si to devel o � nt, the a 1� . At the � l i cant sha1.�1 construct frontal a improvement alon a site fronta on. S:H. 72nd Avenue . g , P , eWai k,, gpaving, and storm drainage, consistent' � ncl u� n curb side, with the City's applicable street design standards. 2. Access to the r.site shat be 1 imi ted to two 1 ocat ons one Ti n alignira'ht 'With the proposed Durham tioadl extensiOn/72nd, AVenup PLANNING COWISSYON MINUTC .. JUL 10, `1890` P•G •l raters n, and one approximQ,t r of the sti. frontage • r as may be 'es i shed'' by °;a'l eft urn �!ane' stacki n! requirements. Applicant .shall Provide a a.: 'nd or of er . assurance amount of $85,466 assigned to Washln gton ,County f4r. the, futLre' iwprovea ent c► the S „W Bridgeport Roar /S.W', 72nd Avenue intersection. The',bond requi rament shall 'nate :i f n, projector .i s not -committed withi n:.5 yeatrs.' Applicant shall sign a waiver of remonstrance against formation of an i .I.D. for improvement of the, S.W. 72nd Avenue/S.H.y Bridgeport. Road intersection. If an L, I,.O.' is formed, the bond. noted 1 n ( 3 ) above shall be released.' Motion carried by a 7 to 2 majority, with Carlini ssi oner$ Castile and Peterson voting "Nay." omission Meeting recessed at. 9:40 p. Commission Meetins reconvened at 9:50 p.m. 6.2 SUBDIVISION' SUB 90p001)7 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0011 WAVERLY CONSTRUCTION /GRANDVIEW (NPO ) A re ues c for Subdivision approval to allow division of a 2.4 acre pare+ p 10,400 squa, a feet in size. Also parcel into 10 lots between �,5d,`0 and: 10 M requested is a Variance to allow less than 25 feet of frontase on two proposed flag lots. ZONE: R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units /acre). LOCATI Obi _ ' 251 00 10 and 107) south t WCTM� 2_ _ 11 BA tax lots 1 , , East side of SW 97th Street and approximately 400 feet soar .of SW McDonald Street L '� ' Senior Planner Liden reviewed the background ,and l ocati on of ,the subjec area. He explained that in 1911, two subdi i► ,lions Overt origi iwl ly`; approved but were never pursueM and the applications expi red ,r! new . a �. a similar lit application was made for the southern' .property with -' p e sac access a _ png the north boudary , of • the �. roper • attern With a cul d ncl u d i a p art�al p � Mountain ,view anM. He said the e , staff asked for a change of the desgn, becausethepoposed shared stre et would not ali g n favorabl y with E rose Street which i s on the, opposi te of side of 97th Avenue. He s at d that si:4.ff is recormending approval' of the application.' 4 Q �,' Owing advised that. the : meet( n o�►cket .,rtt�� ns the fat 'staff Re ort In.Ormationg n ovi prded by appl want - Maps - showi where streets woad d 1 h' : � p r f the orIgi nal deli �n ors const�uc,ted i n 1:981, a�i d a rasp of 1 ocati'on of serer lines APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Torn Burton, 302 Tigard Plaza, representing Waverly ConstrUcti on ,{ asked. Commission fora coati nuance to allow time to revise the plan. He r opponents � i one be allowed to testify as he world like to take requested that Qwp their eoiicerns into account before redesigning the deVeloP ent. P! ANNIt G cO 1YS Iii Mxw01'E r LY 0 1990. tt PrAGE , ii' •1 Therefore, our comments of March 20, 1990t, ' are On ( fer, Associate . Plan At t.che� ` is, tha stauff report aind'' applic C qr ehensive Plan r ent /tone }Change itir • dpi.ksr s iii Np ri ij``C .:.'r 'r re ,014,:::,r;,. of pie prroposal etpon froaa the ;April 3 199►0 �etir g I' at . t est , of thr -�app►l'icant. sincw muc=h of the staff and a evisa� tag agency op�w to oib t`a this proposal' based upon: traf fic 'concern© related` to�'the '8N 72nd Avsny ®} "'mower Rones; Per; Road /Bridgeport Road intersection Ldja�oent try {the 'aite, i h�k applicant esentatives ' ha t *0'0,i. 3 , vet conda"cted f!ic ��anaYy sir ,, �re " t' . i ,adds iona�. lira pro sal'.: The bddi tiostal r ©port, „ oi' +dune, l9 attached. The . intent of the further , t ,dy was to ident f �' , • , �� Mpot�s�t a� ro improvam. eta; an d u thods try. fund i�rrpr' ov n ent,a that mid the ttaf f; situation , at *hie'', i erei�otton sufficiently that reviewing `'agencies ,ah d tl City; of Tigard could support the proposed reo'asinat.or:� The ,,';,e, ppliaant representatives , invc .ved ` the City of �. Tigard :L`��tginew , ; #-z Y'Divieion,r City► Tualatin, •Washington ,County, Oregoix 3tatt.b '3ighway, Divaision, and "Tri -.ice fail ''tl review of proposed ersection improvemsnt s. '. u,".nrdov.;it s from thwsa agenc3,eat also attached. �,It r , �lanriirig ; �roaiie's h ter review of the Addit oj 1. T: aff�c Anal sJ1 lthe° °eo ► eats r.of tae rev►ie 0irtg agencies, L ataff 0424* ave nts 'intersection bei ►g i n place, ` or , des�,'in t�ily► gin: *dent . fo . cc nstruct o� , poteic►tiai • ddit .onal traffic ct ..o , ' cosmerc c ... a impa call ; cievei ®� "� nt on thee,' 8uh��rtia site' � �3d reco�c��nd d n�.a3 coed ` rat.ort �:, +�ix�ues,7 to -; of t� s ro '► Inm. be too s i3. s ,ant to :suppose* cedes "�, ... .. �, net ��. P]� 1, . p p ,� �eho .. � `t, � a! th acta site 'from Lfrght industrial t +a. t enera�l kcial and , etc i r• Ij. , Jerry Offer i and Planning Department p.0. Box 3397 P tment igard, OR 1°7223 Dear Jerre: CPA � 90•�DQ� �'►r'1C AN�►LYSISro " t 4 /C0N 90- .0002, ' HIIN'G Tile Cites /5�'Z�� of Tualatin has received In e City the n ha from. MacReinz a Engineering ` .. have not reviewed Additional in Traffic , Analysis ,mot -eit June have notes dated March ink. g etai l c.:.imc, June men to detail.. r ,However, our primary comment We ]��el eve � traffic �'�'� remains . the and surrounding [the problem at the areas is a north Tualatin i from through Tualatin. Z lem' ♦.a. Interchange problem. `"af�Eic from Tigard and . Lake Oswego � , inti .users interchanges as we��,;.as dr elc an es � sources P.r �` � mare limited re a all use. � he . �.nter�h,�x; sews �.��'1d s ge . is significant long -range t meft should Fr y in the, southern _ ame in `,mina �plann for and within a regional corridor and should ' -y ang, � 1 � St '�'heCit Tualatin strongly studied y of improvements and understands g y su pp�arts frsetw� . imam that the Cit �,r interchange tinge you have any comYp;.Qht r please call nra at 692- 4)000. Amie P,, Jacks U Planning' Director jb c : City : Engineer Economic Development Coordinator r'C��. A�. �,a�ir -, tile: Tee -90 03 i0; r 05333 'VvASJI.1114GT June 22, 1990 228 1285 r. Lans Stout MacKenzie Engineering, Inc. PO Box 69039 Portland, Oregon - 97201 0039 Dear Lans, 1MNIPOOTA • GA. • The purpose of this letter is to respond'ta your draft report on the 'SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road traffic condition. Our review of the ;draft report has been inewhat limited due to ` the, fact , Daryl Steffan having left the County rocently and Tom Tushner 4s Unavailable this_ week. However, we do feel that your study and report have ' thoroughly identified the traffic problem associated with the ;subject intersection, and feasible alternative solutions to the problem. Also, as 5.t4ted in your report: we concur that the problem is multi -,iuri sdi ct i ona l and Sri 1 1 require the joint coord lnation of three cities, the County OUOT, Tri -MET and other benefitti ng pr ®pe rty owners within the Immediate area to solve thi problem: trl As with most problems of this magnitude and corapl ex i ty, it will take si g nifi•cant amount of "creative financing" to fund a construction project to solve the local and regional traffic. problems in this area Given the facts, Washington County is willing to c nsider participatitIg in funding this Project. This willingness to f a►i. cy ate is predicated d on other Jurisdictions and benefitted property owners' willingness to patrticipate also To accommodate cooperative funding of this p roject Wash i ngton Count i s wi l l i n g to i. support formation of a LID based oh the necessary petition process from oenefitting property owners and to help facilitate coordination among other Jurisdiction to complete the nP ersary "cre tive financing" package for this intovsectlon improvement. If you have any questions or need Sinceri�j; additional information, please let me know. 'i Capital Irnprovcments _! ro rar'i Manager • • cc: John Rosenberger DLUT Torn Schwab ODOT Mi a Icl�ill p, City Of Tualatin Rand / �iooley, City 'o'ir Tigaud doe Walsh, lri -.MET JP : me JPLS 155 North Fire Avenue eparrnerit of Land 'Use and Tri n tet r Hitdboro, Or rt 97124 IW. Adr ti ntsttat o e soma -e Xa 5►`4 07/02/90 TRI -COUN AN TkiANSPORTATION DISRICt Of 0,REGON 11:,20 4012 SS 17T1.0. r'► VENUE POATIAND, OREGON 97202 June 29, 1990 0503 228 1285 Lana Stout Mackenzie Engineering 0690 Sw Bancroft street Portland, OR 97201 Jerry Offer City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Lana and Terry: MSA ME 1 -►-►y ` CITY OF T I GARD 14 �e has followed with interest ntereffit the discussions about Potential improvements to the SW 72nd and Bridgeport intersection. Mackenz ie's work on this subject has documented a Problem that does nemd attention. Trio !at buses 'anal the patrons at the Tualatin Park and Ride experience these delays daily. We have not evaluated the alternatives in any'detaii, but understand that alter,,_ considered by some of the jurisdictions invo�lvedato�he the ��o�€�t� feasible. That alternative would not have a significant icant impact act on the opratioae of the park and rids lot, but would all but eliminate the potential use of the parcel to the north as an expansion site. While there would additional � u e anso �a► aC�a . under be some add/ a.. �ornt�d� ► ®s$n ®tdlerov�.deaase�t�th� ®�;tst n lot un�i�s e p a dingvt .v 1 of to the north . p y P Mention is, e existing lot's contrYibutio* to the ads of ttYii in problem, bolt : it should be street . r existing p noted that. the �.i��t s � significant im 2nd�andtl7 �P 30 feet cofQnewlpavementdand curbs andsidevalkson feet de of rebuilt. street plus curbs and sidewalks on Lower Oconee err�P In addition, provides d >�► .�t es lating alternative that keeps over 200 vehicles ada off "downstream" routes y including SW 72nd and 1-5 and it's ramps. , t any more bpecifics, we Cannot provide a Tri - -[et Position Absent on the i orraatian of a Local I apzo v e e nt Distr i ct to fund a m aj or highwaY it ovel a e n t project. partici p ;tti n should riot be Elssumed, c onsidering that we aro P r ohibited law by from • , lat.4 100 I 2 SE McLOUGHLIN, MILWAUlne, OREGON 97 Jerry, Offer •City of. Tigard P, 0,, Box 23397 Tigai4, Oregon 97223 • Subject: Review of Traffic Stiy 72nd Avenue/ Bkingeport Intersection Washington County • We have reviewed the Traffic Analysis Report for the SW 72nd Avenue/Bridgeport intex•L;ectic)ii prepared by Maci(erizie Engineering. The traffic report was prepared m response to a project referred to as , the Spielcer-Bingliam Plan/Zone Change. We have worked wit the consultant during the ,preparation of the report. The report is quite thorough in • terms of identifying the r)reblerri clevelcspipig alternative solutions Much of the rapid traffic growth and the exr.,.ectd future traffic increase in 'the intersection, can be attributed to the recent and potential development within the immediate ai-ea . Ot)OT is making a substantial iiivesttrierit in improvements to the regional freewpy system to accommodate the increased 'traffic t5-r(yvvth generated from this area. We, agree that cooperation among the agencies implement th is required to mplement a solution. I have suggested the consultant meet with our design engineer to see if the proposed irnpro%,enient can be foldd into the ODOT project. The • i)rojec :7.. is scheduled for next July and after much delay in the past we intend to continue on that time path. If you have any questions, please call. Thomas SChwab,;' TransptrtatitmilAnalysis .Manager THS!Cay,,111 „,. c: Ted Spence, Plan and Programming Lans Stout; Mackenzie/Saito & ASsoc., P. ,.,1050 (1437) 0629jeof . . ;(GOLESCHMIOT;, Pepartrrient of Transportation �LG1-1VA' DIVISI R one KIE OHEWN 97 �2S.E M��. ©U�l4LIN, NIILVUAU � .. my 3,1 Jerry Offer City of Tigard P. 0. >Bcc 339 Tigard, Oregon 97223 subject- Review of Traffic Study 72nd Avenue Bridgeport Intersection Washington County PHONE 6534090 : . R*Ply Res!, TO ltii Ho `!Ve have reviewed the Traffic Analysis Report for the SW 72nd Avenue /arid intersection prepared b MacKen: ie En ineerhI . eoi�tin Y �. g gP ter�ee The traffic report was preps a in response to a project referred to as the Sp eher- Binghar Plan /Z. ne Change. We hi -fue worked with the consultant during the preparation of the report Thc- report is quite thorough in terms of iden acne problem' developing alternative solutions. Much of the rapid tr c, growth and' fi the ehpected future traffic increase in the intersection can be attributed to the recent and 'potential-development Within the immediat 'area. °DOT, is making a substantial investment, in improvements to the regional freeway system to accrmatodate. the increased traffic' growth generated from this area. We agree that cooperation among the agencies is required to implement a solutioru I have suggested the ce.msultant meet with our design ;engineer to :see if . the proposed impravern2nt can be f yded , into the °hoT project. The project . cheduled for next July a,n delay in the past, we, ns s a � � � � � d after much intend to continue on that time path. If you have any questions, please call, Thoms H. Schwab, P. 'E. Transportation Analysis Manager THS:cay ec 7 red Spence, an and Programming Leans Stout, MacKenzie /Saito & .Assoc., 34_1850 1, 41 i) 0629je0 f ri 1 JUL 719 9a �Il"k (.01- l 1taAft PtACIN114G' CIEP' Ti�- COUNTY i1t1ENOPOLITAN TRANSPORT4LTION " 'DISTRICT OF ,,OREGON 4012 S.E. 17TH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 June 29, 1990 Lans Stout Mackenzie Engineering 0690 SW Bancroft (Street Portland, OR 97201 Jerry Offer City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Lans and Jerry: iL'O2: Tri -Met hens followed with interest the discussions about Potential, improvements to the 'SW' 72nd and Bridgeport gntexs m i l. at cI le ' s wor k on this subject has documented a prQ,b l e t� does need attention. Tri-MEt buses and the patrons , at the Park E. delays daily. 3��. � ae Tualatin P aa, k ?! nd Ride experience these We have not evaluated the alternatives in any detail, but d that alternative D is considered by some of the understand jurisdictions • involved to be the most feasible. That alternative .. ions operations ar, the Park on P urasdict' in t o � $rk would not have a significant impact P and ride lot, but would all but eliminate , the potential use of P � would ble to the existing lot the arced to the north as �ana�xp�nason site While there under be some additional area made alternative, D, it does not provide as much expansion capacity as expanding the lot to the north. ret q. lot's ention is made of the existin contribution to the but it should be noted that the lot's e � existing Problem, b that construction also funded very significant , street lin rov events p- q t�. P ewtre new pavement and curbs and sidewalks on 72nd. ant , 17 30 feet of p! I .... feet of rebuilt plus curbs and sidewalks on Lower Boones It street lus �,. Ferry In addition, the lot provides a commuting alternative � that keeps over 200 vehicles a day off downstream ,routes including SW 72nd and 1 -5 and it's ramps. Ab sen t an y more w s ec : M a; c s a we cannot a nn of provide a I T ri -M -Met position on the formation o f a Local Im P rovement Distric to fund a MaJo r highway improvement project. T rh Met s participation s hOu ld not be assumed, considering n q that we are p r hibted by law from • re rovemert rea Ir Jerry Offer ►xgard Planning Department P : 1i oX , 3397 T gars i, . Ok, 97223 Dear Jerry : "AnilIFFIC ANALYSIS" �," 90- .00(TIONAL b4 /COT AIF,' 90- -0002, BINGHM /SPIEKER The ,City of "Tualatin . has r ce,ived ifrom Mac endieeE ginee� ing Inco!~pc.�rated the Additional T'raff .a ,Anal,y have 'n't. reviewed it in detail ,However, our .priary ooana,.4• t it ur Ie tter dated .War ch i9 ,'to..... you remains, We bet ieve the traffic problem , apt the forth Tua?,st, tin In °tnrchange l unding areas.: IS a,. eg.ronal problem. 'ir4if it; f Y'4ira` Tualatin i ' L arham, Tigard and 3 aire ,Oswego,-- - - as well as drop. j through "traffic f rota .1-5 users all , sse , the. interch�anflgned ' for ewa aare limited r" and should ,,be . P shed with a long- range :t mefra a in mind. This rchafige inter 4 ihte developed is significant in the southern " 15 corn! dor ',and should ,be ,stud, e. ext. Tonal coat wit3�'�^ a r�`��9 , . The Gm0f Tualatin strop ly , su p � R�Cr eera f r inter ehan ge im p rov eeats and understands that tit • � o Tigard � does als should y�u % a ve 3n ; co idents , P aease cale a� s92 2000. " , m � 7 , F. e ?ackS, AICP Planning Director City Engineer_ _. me Coordinator De ". P n Coordinato. I r• V6 �9►SHIN a QiJN'TY, OREoo$ June 22, /990' Mr. Lans Stout HacKenzi e Engi nee'a1 nW, Inc PO Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201 -0039 IWO Dear Lans The purpose of this letter is to upend ` to your draft report on the SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road traffic condition. • 'limited', , due to the fact p has been soaae�, at I review Steffan having' l eftethetCount recentlyh'and Tort Tushner is unavai 1 ab1 e Our �ary� 9 w do f y this week. However, ,we eel that your . st+ud and report have thoroughly': nd identified the traffic problem associ ateG, with he subject• intersection , feasible alternative solutions to the problem. Also, as stated in your report we concur that th2 'Problem is multi - jurisdictional and will require the joint coordination of three cities, the County'000T, Tri•MET and other ben4fitting- property, owners within the immediate area to solve . the probl €m. As with most Problems of this magnitude and complexity, it.will take a significant ampuht of "creative financing" to fund a construction project.to solve the local a . P in( this area. Given these facts, solve onal traffic, Problems ,.in regi P Washington County is willing art this consider p ici sting in funding -ec tiffs_willin nessnto Participate is redicated on Other jurisdictions and benefitted property owners' willingness o To` to participate,. also., acr, *mmodate coa4erative f nding of this project Washington countsRi f. willirw ; a ne .essary pet i t i On prose, from support formation of a LID of i tt i n ro ert�� owners a�d�tonhel p fa�ci l i tats Coordination among other 9 P P, � jurisdiction to complete the necessary "treativ* fiNancing" pae'kage for this . ; "interSection" improvement. If you have any questions or need additional' information, pleas'. let me know. Sihcer Iar rter, P.E. a, =n . Capital ... P ovements Program Manager cc: John Rosenberger, DLUT Tom Schwab, ODOT Mike Mckiilip, City of Tualatin randy Wooley, City of Tigard Joe Walsh, Tri -MET JP :me JpLS 155 Nash First Avenue; irid Use 'i'rt AdrnirierStion Hillsboro. Or ni 97i ZZ • 72ND'!,i E�IAX 1//e Mhx it ANY MR ANY §;zone x /.o 5 Lam:';- us a Ri .LANC..7) ': P,A5$ ..-4 ALAL15IS is SAs w c;N Peig, IS 1-11A), vo u6;'L.5ktillE Ei 1G'� PAI<.i;+A ; PAC:T IL, IS OS ED 114 (2UCs,Itp46 AUAL SIS ivC~r : pat.visIokt a OVA L 7 -r 4. htrI.TI.46° I.D Fg p, L C`U 7 iC-+r. 1P!4"Ati T '( 1 v-tPIDVE. ?; 15 RA►'► o, ' fir, !C. .tG.' ; :.::.)' : o ;r t� 5 V H OF aA�N'1) Ar /d-1 d a ki n wip°rr; L1V1�`4�! ,..-ti t 3 1^r"G &"G L;; " °J- S'�:.;N,�- J S J,.,, `, i, r �� crG' h1 -.°A ;Ai Al - '" rf. T = c 77, oil.+ : 74 Al -m t, co r-'l pu i c Vi tWS ? n1, 5?sO0xt.D A��\ u,�i AS 0 sEZot.105 4 "11-li I MACt,(ENZII"a ENGINEERING INCORPOPAtED 0590 SSW o:ere: AGR'T STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97201(503) 221.8 P.O: BOX 0039 PGA q T AP1D ORSQON97201 PA )2•..12$5 )2211 ear.Jerry►: a » Enclosed ii s'r �, coF,y of our draft repert on' the tr^affic'., eon alitionl. I ant thanS,mitting tote re process :,5y" copy ,cif this , letter Our schediil e i s as f01,1 ows: Distribute draft ''report Receive codments from agencies Tigard /Spieker /NEI Review , Sto ,f rt f of;: . Re p . or ►t Plinnir��g Coimnission Meeting Thank ,you for your assistance and coo jek°at o Sincerely, Lars Sto t LS /ksw Encl Osure cc: Study pa�1ticipants prepared by: kenzie Engineering Incorporated MEI) e 0690 S.W. daticroft Street' P.O. Box 6909 Portland Oregon 9'1201-0039 503/224-:S560, 503/224-p51 • - 124., 4 • tau Tra fic considerat =ions, and specyfically t Bridg�e►ort'; Road, i.s a consideration ; ,ei' ∎ elit/Zone: change i n the .Ci y of T` gp ��eriue na►�r•tt�� of SW.n,., �Brd a rarw hoad�. nidustri al (I L) to General Comrner,'o :i al ' (G. 1 �t $ er jur0.sdici .... m.v . al � eV` eW'..by the C'i ji and' o, zh� ►, would be appraptri ate to` :;,expand the '9 rst . eve Engineering '' I,ncorporated„ MME 7 i on • behalf of t CAm ni sssf on Q s cor si derati on of the proposal w 'level �� •Thr�:' purpose of `: this second ' ' l e i tudy Impacts ,on the crT ti cad intersections, and traffic couditio:iss: crsect'i'on i of S o W. end ,, enuelM respect to a `proposed �c p` ehens` d . ' 1 nThe ell_ s , l fctted 'o ' S.W. 7 prop0Sed Rlan /Zone chance i sp fi Io s .i nd dated thhat addi'�t i f anal sib 0:00.0.01i' she! ie applYicant. Therefore, s .'tabl ed unt°� 1..,' July 1990 oval ste�die by Y MackEinz1 the a�bi n • `'evaluate the o ffect'' ,e : additi onal ana �► P potentI al w�ays :to improve' To facilitate this ,effort, representatives o f e,ffrci d , agencies s ,have, . met 'a ' �A 1 i st r f , agencies. and contact individual :s i s: included' as an idi�s�lt�s�sed�. the i��ss��es: appendix to this report. ME 1; on behalf of the applicant aid prop;e �t�. �;wner, has prepared this epor.. 8 a r A +hat the t�o)I' Criti�:�►1'i this aroj act �';ocu�te' is Gr e' dnitia � . : . The., Y' y .stud prepared f � j inters +aNU °; r an�� west of Yoh a the freeway off -rate and at ;�6W0 Bridgeoort Road, bo h funet i f �; ? do -qu tel, y when vi eked 1 ndependentl y. However', the ;von `1 stacking stance between them i s deficient, resulting n rehi ches 'dot; clearing the Intersections on green,: often blocking opposing lane:;. i'he� key s; ►Iae, therefore, i s the Stacking distance between then intersectiova Jurisdictional coordination includes throe'' cities, thre outfit ,' The part i c rant >s in this study concurred that the problem is of a not rrasi l.y solved by a single body. It is also clear from past tnalyses that where i i ntersrct i en with the current level :f development. that any additional development, in the area notwithstanding any proposed rezoning jo 7 , and Tri -Met. rsg i oral " :nature, a s:!bst;,iiti a i probl em at 'this It is therefore i nhu'errtly will a acerbate the probl erg, "Regional" traffic is also a ` substantial issue in this ..traea;, ; with pass- throu;h� traffic bound for Tualatin, western Tiga,t.,t azd Durham: � tu� ligest i on at th �� iyben g Road Interchange (Tualatin) has encauraged drivers to eXit at )the subject interchange and proceed to north and west Tualatin via S.W. Bones ktrry Read, The , f utura connection of S.W. Durham Road to S,W4 72nd Avenue w11 further inck .aasa traffic in the subject ject arez, as a ti n "0? direct route. to the west i t—V0ai l abl e. , • I I 3. tesi'gn alternatives anal for 72nd .Avenue 1S.W ri A lepor recommendations. '' t — o '. tem ' is' covered a se aratt! 'Contract wit i..'Washlnton',,County al separate Cover. The other stun, ► comperents are addressed, /� I .thi s Data coll:ectio and an.a,lysis i flcguoed, a cense actual flow of, traffic from ;lrcrham, Road, westo `�5. assisted n' the '. redi stributi on of projected projectertittraf fl extension and S.W 7 n`d Avenue. The Park ,and '$ide far assess peak hour traffic volrs Traffic projections from DtDOT and METRO model for year .20e� °and projection appear to have questionable accuracy. Therefore' thi analy i s ` e'� ios upon ,1X991 voluw? with the addition of'known or planned projects T � Potty design alternatives were prel imi r.ari 1 y generated for anal ys:i s The love itl Of each is:, to redUoe left turn moveirtents afid' err iocroase the stacking 'lengt alternative was analyzed in i ilr ,s of performance and; cost, - and, the results wer discussed at a meeting of the multi- jerisdirti�'orial'' rcor mittee. u A cost i all catoi scenario was subsequently generated. , Relatively .low cost,, No new signals Marg i,nal l y Ide uat.e perfon ance' at current volume Cons: • Does not signi fioantl,y''impirove performanc Potentially d etr imental t. businesses inconvenience `for westbound Bridgeport ;Road traffic 22, Cost � $5 Al �erna�'c B Concept: Divert southbound , freeway exiting traffic ',�■ r±ednce left . ,turn.... 72nd " and lane conf i cts due to lane crossing maneuvers. Pros: b Si bstanti al performance' improvement Maintains existing Patterns south of Bridgeport sncr ses.Tr -Not area south of Bridgeport Cons: egh Cost Cone • Busing traffic pattern One new signal plus Ohe relocated "signal Al tern, Concept: Cove intersection west, di Vert 72nd Avenue traffic southbound S.W. H zelfern Road. Pros: Good flow for southbound traffic • Substantially improved ,erormance. Single traffic pattern Cons: 6 Potentially adverse impact on business • Tri -Met traffic routed via Hazel fern Cost �• A r ' Concept: Move intersection west; Pros': Considerably improved perforaance • Maintains existing traffic patter:r■ • Increases area available to Tri -Pkt Coons: •'.Requires: retaining wall ▪ Cost Cast; $918,000 It should be not' d that nflne of these alternatives require the ac,qui si ti on of right- of -way because Of the existing excess °DOT right -of -way. and County -owned land that is avai'rable. The consensus of the review group that ,yet' on June 8, 1990, including all agencies listed in the Appendix, was that Alternative "D" `offered the test combination of improved; performance, s i mpl i c ity, ' and cost effectiveness. Eulas There are two ma ,or consi'deratl'nns in establishing funding scenarios: the basic sources o f funds, and the al l ocai.i on of response i b l i ty "ror the costs involved, The inter agency group partielpatinai in this study generally agreed that the 'need to imp olie the intersection capaci t j currently exists, that 'it it a ,'"reg i enal " problem,. and at there should be a method of al i ocating costs among effected all 'Of the parties The major participants in the project acre sUm rnari,; ed as follows: .J.i.9. - Tigard has an interest i n performance. of i ntersact i on as a �' the the secondary access to the southern parts of the City, and as it effects devel o ment of ro ert i e the City. However even if funds were available, _ P P P sin th the intersection is i n Tualatin. ington Cot n v - The ct interest due. oi�xtens . over nrisiiiction ov�,r Brid.. a ort Road and 72nd Avenue, and g p The County could otenti z N l p sponsor an �., the Durham nO funds are assigned ;.D. Although 're directed 'now, the County may have ome responsibili ty due to the ©urha�m Road traffic and the future devel opme t of the ' "pits b 0001 - ODOT's interest in this area is based on facilitating freeWWay oriented traffic. Also, ODOT �i is the lands owner" and "developer"' open' ; of nee Configuration de Park and fide station ODOT hays proje t 'din with +U scheduled f to mprove the 'ramps an 1a ct t for 1991, which it may be possible ®� then substantial improvements sUch as Alternative 3. • 1 �V Le Qa •h NM tri -Met 9 s ,) interest i s ;i n the performance :of �� .ts Pa k and Ride sta, on as i t exists' and if' expanded. Al thcugh ODOT on behalf ,of "Tri Met," °added some y,. � t : the ` Park. and, Ride lane,,,,widering .witch the original fa 711 :it is clear' has a signifi'cant ,impact -in the intersecti'o n, ''`tk Lv ,pry,' 4401. -, All property owners . i 0 the area;have ' An interest n the inter section., However ,Washington ' ,Cou■ ty, PaoTrust, Arad ; Spieker • partners /Bi rvyhp , 'Investment control the'; bul k l of the . level opabl �e lend:. .. , I �� r TA an/ Zone. pending n a I sin interest due to; the P, .g / �Spi eker /Ri ngh�m ^has the most pressing ; � , ,� change application, ' iiut clearly not 'the largest. share of the ultimate cost' ►f the °improvement,. It Should a be noted that de'1e1 opment of ' the si to - under the i sting' ng zoning i s ,possible, oi nt (although, npt �, ' . i ctiona i. , stae� e� r f��A�n a jur 1s economi c��l l y f ��a� i b1 e, so the true impact is not. traffic, but rather 'the i,�. due to the rezoning. I �nts a `d� that' v ma It ��s clear . �t6�a't na single entity can fully fund t6ie ►2e�ede impro e , the inter - jurisdictional coordination will be critical and time consuming., Therefore, it appears most appropriate ' tr., estz l ish'a cost' allocation scenario and a methodology to proceed wit ► formulation of a project. The recommended allocation of responsibility is based on a comparison of existing. conditions and conditions with anticipated development. I ,, j,jn itioM means current traffic levels and direetionri31, "distribution Llitirg.....Canilithat means; current traffic levels and distribution' with 1. Revised distribution due to Durham Road ;ext.ensia\6 2. Added traffic due to Tri -Met Park and Ride expati ,ion _- _• 3. Added traffic due, to the increment of increase du `, to the change from I.Lr to G.C. zoning, on the 'Spieker Bingham site. rel atiVe impact of these factors o!il the future Accompanying_ calculations indicate the p scenario is ay , ons at �tersection and responsi y cy�5�iti S icraffis� the �� ec as follows. cost susMnari zed ^ ' , ADiXt.D PERCENTAGE OF °FUTURE TRAFFIC IT.F�" �.. -. �P,��.,TRI�'S .. I C�1ND,OUS . Existing Conditions 1953 77.44% T ri -M et Expansion ansi on 94 3.73 Durham Road Extension 240 S p iQk er Site :I 74 Spieker Sit,: @ G.C. ( +) ,, 2 52 . I 100Oii , TOTA1. t.l+».. i gib r • F as • r r LU Cost Allocation Rased on Alternative • RESPONSIBILITY PERCEN? COST-TOTAL Regional Existing 77.44% 710,899 Tr -Met (Expansion) 3.73% 34,241 County (Durham Roao) 9.52 87,394 Spi eker /Bingham (w /G. C. 9,fl% L 4i6 TOTAL 100.0% $918,000 The °'existing condition '° portion of the cos: may be `Banded through re- allocation; of the DDOT project funds, other development projects in the area, and potentially the assignment ; of system development fees. The method of collecting these funds and accomplishing the project may be an L.I.D. or a County /ODOT joint project if the improvements can be constructed in conjunction with the 1991 ODOT p � roject. The "SPieker/Binghamr Portion Provide site develo ment under I . L zonin lad wi h the C�G Pl an Zone chang a the This amount shou` l `therefore be the total responsibility of the site, whether the improvements are funded through an L./C.D. or a a "permit" project. RECOMNEND�►TION_FQR I /BIN6 6, ZONE; bAN The following conditions would b�� a proy i a s to address the ' PP -.�� ►�. t� impact af the proposed pl an/zooc change from 1. L. to 0 .C. 1. At the time of site p a pp hall construct frci;tage' development,. the' a 1 i cant S rove .< dr `t �e cons .tent e, t cl uding tcurb,. imp`- ��n� along tine site frog► aoe an S W 72nd Avenu sidewalk, paving, and s .,i)rm _ ainag , , l 'with the Ci y's applicAble strce.t design standards. 2. Access to the site shall be 1 imi'ted to two locations; ono in, alignment with the proposed Durham Road exteo$404 4' 2nd Avenue inter °xe ion, and one approximately at the center of the site frontage or as may be established` by left -turn l ne stacking requirements.; P s � }•... f , 585,46 �� or ther ass shall round a bond or o Durance in the a��oont 3. Appl i caa� o ass �;gned ' to Washington County for, the fut4 a imps ovememt of the 3.�W. rid eport Road /S.W. 72n, d w ion• 5 The bond require. . d Av Bridgeport. e t is not commute th terminate i f 'a ro c ha 1 mi enue intersecti��an. ement s er P j y 4. Applicant shall sign 'a aiver of remonstrance` against formation of an L.I LD: for ite rovement of the S.Wu ,nd AvenUe /S. . ridgeport Road intersection.' If ormed the bond d ,noted in () ;The 2 s i hi 1 i't� of the site A3 n ' he above- eD shat l be release maximum respan y shall be 9.3% of` the improvement cost based on trraffit' impact as described above. w- M1'siai�r� iYcai aiuii r [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] ittlotiot 111 `e taro t14441; • X44 I t 3: 3 OINK ! ;St Pi et Of liIwgrii t,., Caltulatt,ti summaries follow. A cop1ete pekage of Paser2 caleulat available vioo request. ).;' °S HOUg 71,64ro Ah1' 1 At • ACEN21 A1TO& A,SCIATES, P »C. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING, INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 BANCROFT St . P.O. BOX &9039 PORTLAND, I E.GON 97201.0039. (503)224-9560 b'FAX "(Sb3 ) - 1255 flay 31, 1990 city o Ti acrd Attention: Gre9 • Perry • 13125 • S.W. IA11 'Blvd. • p« Q' Bok •233$J • Tigard, Oregon 97225 e e i n dry Alternatives n` it Intersection Reviaion Project $0m ber 190108 «01 • • ca...4v*.47/pootti4 .000, Dear Greg: E.x�+1en��nare � � �f �r� of f��nrr��►c�es�‘��ae designs, � �urh�rn goad which 1ncln+�e th e ndt Pp improving g the capaci of the S. W. 72n1i /B1-idgep � Road, intersection. We are currently analyzing the intersection capa ci t ► es and performance of these alternatives and are preparing preliminary cost estimates.. discuss eti all scheduled comnlen " 10A ', JUNE 8, 1990, 9;00 a.m. AT TIGARD' CITY HALL to �� Meeting ng � s schedul �d for ,�u on the al terhati vex w We will have available Our p parties' t estimates for review at that time, Ca achy a~�alyses and c Our schedule provides for completion of the study by June S, 1990t . so that the City �„ Planning Staff can provide appropriate information to the Planning Cec n. ss i on for the ly Commission meeting, ry erc ch 1, am asking , at all cy o� thi s 1 eater � and the, l a�se�d ske�.��es; r copy etati ves review and comment on the alternatives and attend the meeting on June. 8, 1990, If possible, Thank you for your assistance, erei;, Lane Stout, Planning Nanager iSiksw nci o sores Al, t ernatives i.st nr'` Agent ` epre en t t,l Vie, • I :it .t.►l. ' 1iw i4 - i ., r city of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Jerry Offer Keith Eiden Greg Berry felliALEMAMI City . of Tualatin P.0, Box 369 Tualatin, Oregon '97062 Mike fickillip Janet Young ashingtn County 150 North First Avenue Hillsboro, oreg�►n 97124 639. 4171 P. '9GEPQR '' Planning Planning • Engineering 692 -2000 Engineering Planning • 648 -8781 Jerry Par entrer Lan Use & Tr a ion . Transportation John "losenberger Land Use & Transportatir. . Mate of Oregon Department of Trhsportat 9002 s. E. McLoughlin Boulevard fi l wauki e, Oregon 97222 To Schwab Ted Spence Ron Fa;i lmetsger` .B.W.LiAttLIIIMELT 22 4'26 ngham Coottructicm ' 2939 N.W. ,; St. Helens Road Porti and , Oregon 97210 t l.art, Ingham e Larson Stout;. Salto; 224 9578, P1E ER. AR" lEB 684 -4666 Spieker Partners P. i1. Box 5909 Portland, Oregon 97228 -5909 Jim Eddy Tri -Mat 4n12 S. • Port] and, 7th; rego t •4'7282, Joe dal sb 238 -4905 MAC EN IE GINEERING INCORPORAT a gi( i D 204m 445 • FAX Pt g28-1285 April 25, 1990 MAY 1 1990 Tigard Planning Commission c/o Plotniin9 Department nt 13125 S.W. H Tigard, oregon 97223 Re CPA, 90- 0004/Z00 90-11002 Project Number 190106.01 Dear Commissioners: briefly. eX .. , be undetrtaken by of I ent your April a�e1�i ng � �� Pi ai ned the effort � with to on 5 W 72nd Avenue S.W. At `� respect to the traffic conditions ores near our si aridgeport Road. As a result the Commission ranted our request to postpone the heating on this matter until your Nay 8, 1990, meeting. Since April we °have : made considerable progress toward achieving our goal of s. multi jur 'sdi cti opal solution to the existing and future traffic problems. Representatives of Tigard, Tualatin, Washington 'County, and the Oregon Department of Transportation ssue.. have had several "subse uent met on ,;.. discuss these i s , .1 �t .., � 4 discussions wit h�a g a �� r resentatives and a* confident that it will be possible to a,ccomp`i i sh .a study.' to address traffic cnnsiderr ions beYond our site, which impact its potential develop ent The scope of this study wi l i n�cl ude the efl'e the tfs ct o� t �connec,.ion the desitin of this intersect�ionx � des n Al Brid , .. ort 'goad'/72 " Av ;nue intersection. rAnding for ti p d by Binghaem investient ,and ie r Partners with i ro�ride p � the study aspec ts rt acing to the iflutho goad +connection. us to present tut' findings a0 d recommendation. to the Plan- i preparation for Juy 1 1990 meeting u AC R. d /72nd ,Avenue stmt yes pr tie the asington: County funding sr scheduI :staff n tilt for their Therefore on �haif of Bxngh to 1st i aeeneer partne 00.04 and ZQ 90 -i3, unt' 1 ;ydu 9 Thank you; for , iur .asit. -- .0e. Si ncerei. Luis StoUt .ssr cc: nhiuinri, ever' Age ty Pat t i iii pants tab I,,m:: �b'.; 3Y�IMR, �;: MN�i�i' �, ck�dv' k('; �FMMMI�Whi '♦eW�4M'4'..�:'�M;r�k::a li: . �. .,.., ,5',,. „,.,,,', „»J4"F... ..., «��,7A ,... w�,�. ,. ,...». -.. _..0 .;” �. �! Y�: 7t, ea` i�.,,, �,.,., �.* ��ne, u,. whir YkM»,. �m� ➢.�:..MA'��,.,..- ..,..�„'Nh ., -..,. H::wyi.�;.i n.:� a �i _ad4.,.� rc ,..,Mr,:4 ?st veab�r.. .gyp. •.!!Alr.. t�'= ��rilw. ,`;::,:. MAMA :m ' NIAR1Na DAt t apr11, 3* 1990 7330 Plit , tileXHINO A'TI , Tigard City gall - Town Hail 13125 SW Nail flit/ (1h: TL+ a'd, reog. 9'7223 kirk..., nfiIlat on re ensl #e . ian AitindisOnt CPA 90.40 Zone, Change fOtf 90-0002 D,ESTt 1) tolan Rap Amt from Light. Industrial to neral Cesimerdial ) ZOne Change from X= ` ,Might, Industrial) dhstr .et.. -G '(Genera. Comer /dial) district APPLICAIrgt er Pa.: tnera 5285 X4ea i Road! Lake: osweil OR 97034 'tnueaenta. 1939 ' ` t a .ens '�►xtl.a d. CR 972 ROB #Nitentie/8a^ to 6 ile ill, . a TS t+ t ' 0690 Banercft, Stw P.O. ' •69039 ,Pott .and'i 1R 97 1 39 "Vt.' c rthw-eat a+arant t t,he, intere+`±: ,'o O I ter itete ;aa Lir once er a.+i at Brain tYlth 73n• n a ,anal itlrld §.ep ►rt 3r ad , ��. ��►a�+gr�aun inn ±Gi 1a- zoned - fiat �h k a1n+�� land; � �' dl�, fbr this; kcal ha eC ze1 ,hit t ,it, 5 ,x,90 iiltt.t *. tnforaeation The subiect acre nits .s� es bounded on the west i 2nd o they salt byfr Z •5,, on the north- by the Oregon usiness Park, and on : seouth by undeveloped right-Of-way way t► .Qtr tower : ae terry *bade SurtoUndin uses and sorting designatio'is are an, industrial park stoned C -L► to the nowt th,j the foreer Washington. County c, tar 1',, which is Zoned 1- (iridustrLii Park) and which is currently $.S in preparation for' possible future: deev etopeent, is to the wrest / Park and side is to the ' icauth scrtass' tower toones 'terry ad within the City of Tuaiat .n and 14i to the Est. , Industrial, detreeiop .nt is the predoetttant land use on the west side of the f ree�r interchange, Whereat t cost srcial, derslop i snt is the prvodomitiant toms on the east, •idee site It 1fco rsl�atir n; awtnd ., P�:o a*Al . De ►ori tion: Th ildte u nde sit psd site 'ii genera.iiy flat and Is eli gh'cly below he geed* Of the freeway thereby 'di ri mibittiotitti es lunar to ee+i ay traffic. there IS a stand of large* uglas Fir t.,,eises on th. . stite: along w ith, c�dere s altar 'deeciduous tree l and lowdying brush. the agg itant re: mseats a p amendment froe tight toditAttLi'l to dGeneekaL, itotetetolAi and a tone Change ttoe the i -'L► (Light X tdvili ria1) honing district to the 6,4 + enera1. toinmeteitly zoning dieittitt, the applicant hat it: a .fitted a statement deemignateed ' a r t a t t ." n . u t a iP posed . ainensbeent to ;thee di s of Ti 'er raheensi plan and totting Maj.; in addition, the app .icant hat a ubsoitted at ti aff,i, stn in tebtilet fore.- The traffic .study' J i sus�+'..arizsd; within. the `arrant.. Althcion the propt►to' eitignatiot would: the sublet: property evaiialblit for &voldpdi* t t Of' a of the pef'.4itte or` 'Cibtiditiontil a is allowed to the � zoning diattioti the, appiiCant.'s tarratLre and . . y Tektite n e of thi#� site for at �,� ti hotel and; t�a�i� stud retail cent+sr,: ii Hotels retail sae,l+eet kite tilftitfed note in the zone ,send;' are not •eithtt pereittad or 'conditional'u in they preei�len Vet, zoning eititiagnatioxt. l .ed to the i? � ' it 'rtes ; ig3:* e♦earin j ' :ia isS.or � * t • per of owLiag coterten te't r ien'ti.o + in. the ppli+cant* s eithaittal there " ►enu'e tors �stnd. �san.�.z� „ - sre�eacs .i:�r; �. � drrt: s; applioa t ,hat si,." a tr ft et d st they potted onin old ree utt fine i r a - , :in th i . a daitit, i i apart of the s 3 trert ae :Mate .ghwa ; i ieio has r fie the ttud 4 �e+ determined that wile the intersection currsOttt at an acceptable level of service with limited rower** capacity# approval of the proposed a.. plication 'Would ci approval �y g ire �� the �sectican. to reach its ca. it . much sooner. Consegaentlthe to RD does not for the propoared sane change* The trigineering Division shares this concern and thetifcre recommends that this appkiCation d anti* d. The Oregon State Highway Div aios% has rrev►ieWea the proposal t a'a " has come anted that Bevel nt under the pr posed ccirciall, totting typically would be a ed to generate *ova traffic than the iii «feting . tY 1.-1, zone. the LOS ..,. (Level of Seioe) analysis indicates a *Di* ll. y ....ts at this interchange. Development of useel un the, Currently cis pr pe g le:ale capacity of the interchange much sooner 1:.aan uses under ited a�rai ro red toning would ur�ee the the drtin,+g Boning There are onl short term ;;nprovessents planned for this interchange* The Highway Division doss not favor rezoning that w ould exceed this interchange's capacity sooner than the existing zoning. The Highway Division also has canted that the narrative report does not say how drivee ayL Will be provided to serve the site The Highway Division astir es th. t the development will. have only one driveway at the northern end of the property with no signal at that driveway. To . do this i the frontage would n to be long enough to locate this driveway approximately 3'CIO feet from the traffic signal, at Lower Bran e s Perry Road, The, 'City of Durham has reviewed the sal and has requester that; p every effort be made during development of l e site to preserve as many trees as possible* a.n order to help preserve the air c, aaliy► of our environment in this particular air shad., In, addition, traffic controls should be provided in, order to ensure coordinated; use of 72nd and Lowe r Booties Ferry Road, The City of aalatin. Planning be""lZn offered . e regarding r .t oontr � the applicant" i de no redommendation regarding t ►e ia; a Change Tualatin, questioned d, tile tra regarding the timing for the =tons `7ndivenue at'ld, or the, addition of tub /Perr '' Road, interchange, /n addit 33 11a of assumptions r gai$ing the a tiunt' of tra result €rasa, drives -ty to Traffic Atha .ysiaei''' sts roadways and uses: are, ,a change be approved the to attively sups: fut rcie to in this area, fic analyia, sad plan i awe raalysts "' ion caf Inarhaeh Road a at In ' stl,ons, thee ai to t" sit* 'that raa.atan ag r�eesi� with op�asat and fir, but ant theft t%id:isinth, a the d s iu+ _�. Mould the re est+r ale tin 'an buragaz the city of 'dig and inter* The 80 ilr'ding big n p n off' h ve rev; is I the ci 4/ ae Asa caans%►rt 1 8 1 No Other Ommotat iiie have boon recce :1!" a lNOS AND CONCLUSIONS r+eleve 1►t criteria in this case. are *+ Ater/ice °planaai.' gi Goale 1, 2, 'Si d 1 rshrr naive Plan Policies '1.1,1, 4.2,1 4.1.1. S.1.10 1.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4 #, 1.6.1, 4.1.1# 8.1.3, and 12.2.,1 (rational Criteria for the ileockal commercial. Use and the changer or s*ieta)* aril -; udic'ota , Plan .? ?tap r 4 n$ c teeriai of both the C prehen+ei Plan 3flt . pity Davalopment Code. the plannial Di Ilion. c+ hitis1 is t . the, tit a ►s i1 is only partial c 1, :ani a with the, app3Ricahle stn tei Goals based: upon the following findings e is nvc lw e City has 1. 4d$� ' ��. �+ I" ic'tit� ie *;aetiefis+d heeca�issr th+s tt.o i ,citizen invot Veesat, prO,Itak itiditaingt ravieeet of all land Ube and 'detiviloptoot appiitta , ons . " :ra!eighborha d ;p1anraing ditatilatiatie (mss,) ,. iii addition , all public- h ti+ o requitemsote related to this applicatia o have been aiaatiafi d., l 42 (taand Coe' gtanning) .s set i* rived ' i :± a the City its a p lied all appl'icahie titatewide Planning d a1tR ' C ty tii Tigard 'Coot's& waive Plain thtii .icis 64 sa ss C 6tatatrtity beictelOatiiit Code, r-tottiressentis t o the ravielf of this p pasal..' .. Goal #9 ttobiiday, Of the State) ;iii 'sate efied bed-ailed the 10 o oisra redeeiOnation would increase, the City's fine* tory of fide i. le ottimerdial land although it would decease thet;nto of developable industrial land., he lie tdt on eeploymerit iii. the City is ,V5i' in the proposed keilesigo ationn. (.,� ...u� . po.. ) pit not sad pr . Goal, ��, Tsanai station i f.ied - healns�e> the O�' » cede gnatiOn could 1bad to traffic. t.r tbmstit ial t s; s to developed on the gift exceeding ' the Extial g traffic capaci ` 'AO adent . rchange� be i or�i n urceei lea : rcentls: tine. � t� .. tan he made to hove an. already set'ere� 'tra `fie aco st on ;sitnat .o i evelO w t Jiltdet the tett-Oat induiiettria1 des,slg ati +ns ionitti exScerhatee the ottietinq traffic tenttestlibair but to a, lea ase ,e d►::gree than + au1d be e4ected with Veit paten .al ci erCiai 'use t, »; staff ha e deteksioed that the proposed. plan 'gip, only l tialiy Oarisistent with the. demprehene i Plan e polls y :l:l, fie s$tisfi b Witt+eig atido 4s and ;eurrbuodirg property oeraa mat 3 .. the; eat and t+o t" he;arin' s ac+sleetecd. to w. on the lr potato 1 l h setts we'd t' !a bu lding permit proo4ties at which t� d.vo1 ► rint ° o ai, for' this site mutt be _shown to comply with a lic iar trdarae. Starto,, and cegional otter quality rtireaaeentr 'din� r i atide implementation of a ton -point nt sot rce pol control �rol ► �i. � ah compliance with the orego Znvircn aMnta Quality Commi t r iet for the Tualatin Rivet Ulan s' tedetigna n does not by £ is if affect ccw liande t t is Plait Policy 1 is P�laist polity ;�;a�a►�losrstetsd tong �► �`' . :, lAndbotping tee with the davit,° t �►rr�c+essirs is�t Which ildin placement as tto p sct to mitimitin noiiit iiiikactit Of the devm1 ' use u- ,neighboting ,land wait. bedews* this e sad. wilt, t v.. . et�'�tancei t�►s: economic divsriw , tty an poi i . 5 «� :� is not sa , ....... �i primaty threindu a� a�eea "� it heated within the �, ‘dity c i ndludee an area tido Sandberg d to the e uth+s i :, Cit" and f� � . tett it important Bs* the it ii0 -other /and within the City or the titbit Growth ounda" t a„ it as well suits ►` for industrial activity t'r►: the standpoint of p xcel sizes, terraizn, transportation facilities, and tibility +w *it'd burreundLng' uses;:` 101sh Policies 7.,1.2, 3.2., , 7, 4.4,, and i aera s ►tisa ied 1 souse, adequate public 66 Hda pacities acre available e to serve future dev: loptaent. of title ,s to Extension Of n+ecessa slic facilities to * nsibiiito de p, the d o died notifies applicable �iic, f and pac�vaee utii,it� prc�ridaersi� of pending deveio . nt application*, plan Polley 8.1i is not satisd au ae t e N ►ss le *L. n on could lead to d ei nt of use the ieti would to attract 3abttantially to traffic than, *uld e• development 'under th ditilitln# Li ht Industrial 4Z -AI.) deesi�tion .�. ` ed tra f .c would potentially have a. negative ct on t .,.ham c safes streetas ee .. ..ial.: at the intersection of" Lowet traffic sa�+ety on. nectar '" � s, y" d -8 `srid ee .,. 'ado and 32nd ,i ue 'Booneea e� �� e3 won. Stata 4 a ` a .vision indicate that tbi is tree ' "g' ,- �" u.., capacity and a ... � p ►�'' nea�C' its ciimu� stag '` :tit ®rlBt�:t~t'fo� reeaeex ,improvements aree foreseee is he ,neeau iExit � i s int+s g hem � oad se ion/intchan h ou h cs r � i id de relo, nt ou :.. e ssti cacerbat+e the � aeg that exists at many tics d'a and -tit ' reas a tra'f.ic safety ► hat/ Atilt. dit' n of appal of and. . iii � � . � � : w ,..., ;; off' s,at3sfi.+sed asp ..., .,. � ... .,, +etion of s� .ssa �,tv�r� �ia�ale�� et,��e:w s �: �t rays -tit .Aidii4 the Bite''s` ticotnt'*geei litottid to stab d the 1 at t t � � is t.,, Engpin ntg- 18 Istion4,. . ha tr tats igh as: i ie ion, ��C tom, city as ' , "�� multi "i�' a�" Jturilk, ��1� �+' t wtt a to nlec 's tr ` `. oaa ntsa:� , W s LLI the iocaaiona3 criteria tax General. Colutrciaa uses 6 e it Chapter 12 of the coaaprehen*ive Flan (Policy 1 . . } a ,partially tis ra tied tor the 'following raraaoda t ed by residential de** l '4nt on s44ei . mhe c� oriiet aiden aily diktignated this subject area $s not eutrrout Mott that in etceas of 1/2 mile H.. M dircue ed ,above under Statewide pl Goal 02 p1 . Pal i 8 . 1.1 staff it dot persuaded that the, prwop*aed . co rcial redesignatioae would not substantially indriiietiei tratttc � tioni ant there + cane to a n4 on ad�a..ent streets $ r� and itersec . ... , . � - gestiora sitttattl.o�.t�� oconolusioa�o�is Witold exist.Lng traffic con and. increa5. tratitic *slaty concern largely upon the analysis and reddelithdAtiOne oit the Ors on State Highway Dtie on and the City of Tigard ingin bkiritLon. .ection of ata e, the 'irate ;�.s ;located at the intlb ��`� strt+eriel. ( 1 -S ) and ae$eral: titt3Oit c 011isctor att.. s,, ' delta *o the site tor any tu►tWee de*olottaent will be eietertined ih con ttnetion with the Orson State Highway ► fliVL Leona throug : the develoi eft rind**, reds. 8iwionee Road b1i'c transportation i.a. avazl3�la��le aerobe "der` ems`' troth the site at the tei- of t,), rkt, and itidq, , w, . ate �aa var:et` of the 'fa. 6 tote site iia �ai�, asle+cluate raise th an�cc.. �' uteee permitted in the C-G ronktq dtttrict .,, .. ,. ... .....�. ... `th+e ad � ai speoiall this, site i.aw highly 4itibl frcaa G compatibility of his cite with *Matto* titbit iie difficult tb G. aecert a. tqi :1iout azn aactual deor,olo ent prosooelal. Eo w err City of Tigard + a Site beitt aria ;' it: review p .. erase$ are intendoa: to *Lite pro a , o appOrt it lit for reAticitit of at, tO en ial, &oft r ta' a r'et .ationahi. -ith with adjacent 3eoauee the a trey a ota awl in ria. +eaeiet�+g� �aaee � � ti ilit ieauet reg in and �.or etreetet cps ,.., � a e developR ent # ould be azat ,cipattard to '.' except, r'at .r are , to trat't on e''w In order to approve c 'irh+a tit met also d, that there ie sevidence of a change ' ity which atf�s the p s i u�i�hborho or � tivel t City 'fiat. find that there has be a sir with :max t the or g nal des i ation of the ara i r ei Plan, "o► . Po lio .i.1.1,, le"rnestation Strat snit � l 40 ae a pl,ioaiit'° s artativ asae�aa tit t tan cha.: ;ter o tee area ,a � thet site b a El of tl th -ii -o0' Spi p`, p r O• chart notes ' ari + amt h ma of; ` . P a r k ) zo I ; a\s li de atie and 1 .-P tombs i t . The , applicant a : that the area of the most dev elopean under ether th e I � ` the city of Ti. arc iousl,y cannot cif I. a, cc.pls e . analysis c at, such M 'p) o ire Lit n, the , pa is ica' I , on tai 90-0064 and that the t : , I rwal► a a. 9►0 -04 zo 90.02 inghiosht iekot ' a anent a~ana in the a ,lL* r 1 ►` uiNAt1 a eat .tart aaaar in Sill. /2nd Avinu� to ha* aubmitted ',traffic it 'W4t ah a t increat'ud ttaaf fid *� .. '��. inte rohangs. Tha stat•- daftatmihed that while the ifttersidt Nitwi. ts with limited rsssrvt cap ciityr a . 4 caaus the int. aaction to teach it tho 0BHW doss not l'avot the p +maid spina dha a'„ a, aaata *tom rai th+rf can *on a 1d taitult i' tbs. study levet o +Pc►irt aa,'�Lnat as h l+aane tcmilegaantlyt �a 'it *t pltopoted .K.; td 1 Lvt ton, Mira rev rOflt 111~ has The l as 'ing big ision 'hates this con irn and. ,,. ,_., nail th�►t. oiloani+ca , . a 'll�fiitF'�a i CITY OF TUA LATIN atTn o mARTIh1AzzI AVE PO BOX :3 09 `nJA' * ORCGON 97062 0369 w• 603) 692 -2000 liAttiLDBUYIEW March 19, 190 Mr, Jerry Of ft Tigard PLanrhinr Department. .0. Bak , 3397 Tigard, OR, 07223' MAR 19 Dear Jerry RE. CITY OF TIGARD CPA 00 -t )04/CON 90 -0002, BINGNAM/SPIEi R Thank you for res esting comments en is from the e ci t aalatin regarding the .rbposed comprehensive plAn altTdmer aid zone ckinge light industrini. to general to r�,terc�:l �il. far Pr�apea-t, at 72nd�k ue ad i terAt rte 5 (2 � and � (2S1 13AL+ 1700) We g. for g. al to general . proposed change _ from �a h� �. dusa�r�al. � g r,ai reviewed rc sed .• al commercial. commercial tor aunt 666 �acre� Via► a hotel and prepared, •... uses. . Our comments address th traffic analysis by Mackenzie Engineering y aragra . h 3* last sentence* refers to an 0 The ar►,al� r � that ' �� r' to adC�. or re Stripe �.+� Ness a::t '��' r!0► r'o ect this si�m�e h T .� suggest such r.CuaYa�sn �,nte�wcharr�e � dare only " verify a ..., rc�+e that has .,e we are P as �� sty est ou, �er�f w�.th D s`a r+��ect exists because �' • P, does just started, for i -5 from 1-205 nch to �,`mri �ri�`+e. hot include additional turn lanes at the north Tualatin include �e We contacted Tom Schwab at ()pop ar d he was :not l� �'�h�3�'Ii�'e c are of a. :ion Tualat in interdhange turn lane Project thi stainer. curc+ent. .ys .a * 2,. t Par araph Rad and that nee deg available. ashit as an 148r LP Sect `.+filth ""t uct. h refers to the future a ene he would rec+G►m�t�?nd you con a Ysi he lTE e to the aUa teefore shcti o.' tail Sce that is pro- d a pear ha' p trips he iSu'' j. of to . , Inc tle pass I I Id. 0 east t port .d as 'a es an assn* pse, will 0 appears ion to Styye� o 4 Cogent* cn +.! bard 19 1 990 Page ,f Tigard CPk 0004/cO$ 9 . nh /Strike The an+iiyasis 4,. 'irnt sentence, tence, states th e 1 5 interchange does not in in �atei de existing * I onditiona, however, , the tables on pages 7; 8, 9 a nd �.� indicate that the , OXsin 19 90 level* . of service are ail 0. and C. The tables for tae ing except .. tdt trial Zoning alb° maw level* of service at .0 and Cie and �: , for per Boonee/Mc ian Road at the a.m. peak, hour. tables for s *isa ing and : Cenario I. again show levels Of 5 x ice of B and C except fo er ; ones// 2nd. p. a. peak hour. e tahles for exiting and Sc na io. 2 show B and C service iatala except for to 0a8866 It appears the tables on pages 1 and tl do not an govt the state ant that the interchange does not functi ad a elW -`ender exis lug con ditions. P ` .. . , vins� �'�3epa�`ed 7i�e. traft'ic anatlys�tia We n• d a thank thelCien ofoTigard.:for requesting our coae�aen a. We agree with a ta�'��► i`ic analysis that the north Tualatin, interchange y and su; ronndi ng areas is a regional problem. The City of Tualatin sstrongl ' sa ,pp ►tea freeway , and intercha +ge ijprovea entr and unde `atandit that . the City, of Tigard does aiSO nog eth o .... oaagee be approved we i e cua ty f T g ard to ac te � auppo rt 'future freeway any .intetQhange isprOveaeht projects. Should you have any ..+ questionss , pleAtane call. me yet a 2-2000. corn Je c et Manning' Director nagea` . E ng"neer^ tan to city MA ag COhollic velopme i et -00 01 IACKEN IE »NGI NE = INC [I RAT,I MACKENZIE AITO & A mots, +�. « . ► `' weer • ko. 'BOX �l lbw 0 9711 7 04X ( , ' .. I cal a ant c ." udy ai� 1 it 4 Itet20EsT CciieMeTS D.a I! z I90 't / F'ROt4t ' g'atd Planning Department . RR. CPA . ,. ZON 90-0002 Rl1NCR1' //SPXgKNhe land a t% for nano approve i of a 90 D+Qt�4% Comprehensive Plan Raaendisirnt to change 9 frbm 1- x i zLght w xndu*t rial) to C-0 (G' srai Commercial) end to change the toning designation item 1 -L to Gam. ZONE: 1 -1: (Light Industrial) tdcATZON 8e :t ' yen 4 72nd Avenue and Interstate S and south: Of the 'o egbn sos near` Park OWMrkt 261 110► : 'tax lot '1700 ) kttadhed is the site Plan and applicant' S statt.iient for yr tit review. From information tupplied i by 'various departments and agencies airy : from other . infOrnation avai`lahia to our staff, a to ort And recemmendstien . WIll p be tendered on the sal etsn earl future. atedl and a �te�iaion rsil If comment on this applicatiOn, - s wish to c y192Q.:.. You may use the sp e. �prov'ided,. 'holbw or � attach. 'a separate letter to, it t k n ui: comments. s 'r.: r Y r ) �.: (I !L ......'..�.J4x please lout the staff contact noted below with ..: your cowmetts and confirm o cents in. writing po rf you have and questions this m , as the T and Planning De pa eat, �x Box 23397,E_ regarding . ,. i� seattatty Contact �;hre Tig'... 1312! SW Halal 'Ill vd; , Tigard, Di 97123. PE omits: 639. 4111.; STAFF ACTT je ` t Er v E, MAR 1 1990 L ' tat have reviewed the proposal and have no oh)ectio ns , o it tprvai of our office. PLANNING DEpt ..Tx*.021: cHEOK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPtr: Plizzle contact Pleast,:, refer too, the enclosed Written a nts m f jEI 1i fir. ... .f; COMMENTS Bats: Ika :,'Li!iga±trd planning Department CPA 0004/Z 90-0002 BIIK HAM/ar I R, A ,re xel t for apprcv'e1 ►f a Ctimpr,,hansive Plan Amendment tiLl change the land use desigtoit iOn from (Licih Industrial) to ,.(G geral �rcial) and to CIO Age the �WO I s Might industrial) Between t SW ' 2nd Avenue and Int.rstatr S aria, south of the Oregon. 1bunin e$ Sark. (mil 2111 13 ,r tax lot 1100) *ttachdd is the Sit* applicant '$ statement for y review. From information ... supplied ` Flan various and t g our � frem c►th�er information avair.lable to` our sitaff,, a department* report and, recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. y6'11_ t this e►; licatiOr , ire named �' suit letter 8, I 117a. 'toll may tam cement the apace previd r�'t�'urn � .., ed below or attach a � to return nts Xf . ge`� Un a a to ..,relpond. Sly„,. he above . date,,,. please p lae noted below itith y cce �eaitti a*td tonf; your ces, Tits in stiff wr writing as soon oa" po g hYori+e . ...-is matter, con as th tact the Tigard Planning Department," questions regarding 1 a al.l Bl d. r Tigard, OR 972234 WS 639 -4111 evT 'F` Aa r .. VLOffer . .. ?LIME CHECK TBS POt; iI. IT/Poq Tim_ ra: .� , . we have reviewed the. sal, and have no cb3ecti+ans tcs its► Pleat- cO t of ()tit ;office. Please 'refer to; the enatoied letter Written J PARK AT IVE IN PP t" ` OF A PROPOSED At 11 El `' TO Tit WY OF Ti ' toliPREHOISIVt pLA Atli: ZONING RA P OWNER/APPLICANT: n har. DEVELOPER: Spike Partners Ii i ODU `x0 PROPOSED ,USE • UTILITIES/TRAFFIC iu w Ct E S I ALAN GOA . A D POL s DEVELO ICENT COO VI. STATE IDE PLANING GOALS ATTACOMERTS Appl icat on Eon. fax. Hap Property Owner's U Deed Fee • Traffic Analys s INTRODUCTION' This i s proposal to amend . p � � tha City �� o Tigard Comprehensive Plan .and to chance the City Zoning Nap, for , 6.6 acre parcel of land on d Avenue near S. W. tower Boones Perry road. The property is tax lo f 1AO on map 2S -13ADy The proposal will change, the Comprehensive Plan de signation for s Indus tri a,. l" to *Commercial* and the toning frog *I-1 to rC_0'1.: II : DESCRIPTION OF THE Sat AND PROPOSED USE bounded on the west by ,S ,W.: 72nd Avenue the wa �„ on � � on the. east_ by The Pacific. fic. Business Park, and on the .south by property owned by the Stat+ Department of Trans... ortation } It s genet ' 1 flat, sl ightly below the grae of the freewa providing excellent exposure to freeway traffic, There is a stand of Douglas fir trees and brush on the site The site's � ooat� on, with res p e o h eera � ntach ange find major' i, s ,.�''_.... ' al traff�� routes �n the area make it the suited for retail coerci , use., The proposed 'development of `the site will include ret�.Jl. oo ii. ercia�, activities similar to those, 'developed on comparable nearby properties in the City of Tualatin., This type of development would d result in between 104.000 and '00, 000 sq ft. of 'building floor area and between X50 and 400 parking spaces. However, approval of this change wi l l likely result i n development of ab+o' ,t v, 4 ac es f the hi tech eneral commercial uses;; and about 2,'S, acres fey g plan, ,amendment process must consider al.i. plater,' uses, the hotel it a viable opt��on. which is needed in the. area Lid 4 compatibt . :. with the surrounding.,, industrial uses t 'noted that hotels are allowed in, zone as a ` onditi',onal Use ;and: , .. t. t e e e s site without �. Ccrehensive plan that the IP zr�ne could app �i led to chi: ithout a. n qe � However, i f h+e hot i w r...a l l ow`e � d � � � �- � d in his manner, the regaining, act site would be too small for most development under either or IP toning, r� Iwo focal point of a c ria e, �urthe � the hotel 'would be the f �a� p f�' � n r' on the p p .. l . ro ert �h1ch mould sere both the. ir��dustr�ai businesses in the area and the general' public "l erefore,, primarily because of the site of the parcel,. the IP` zone it not a ' i abl a option to allow the ti to s deve opment II P RL h0 " ub' e. Tigard, dater iiis trit can pro"de pu.bli'c water to the site .:inch tie i! °.,nd enue. C. " t, o'f `gard Chas ate Cinch santar; se�ernen thy, S.W. 72nd. venue Whic,h. can iobterve Pr ipe t . ,storm runoff wi i be ,bei provi4ed by an IttAtith stogy 'l one n " venue po lder fire, and alu i+ ipai ser ►roes are prov ded'by the City "igari� ; , p utility 'o'� changing the ultimate development of th+a �'he, affect, on u�� i o, property from industrial to comm.:ere:1 is insignificant. : ,._ . entia'� traffic enera►tIot� ��" 4,,t e site Cdr industri commerctil use is coimpkred as follows i $ in- Condi t.1!ontt acres toned ',tight industrial at 3 coverage approximately .s q ft and use Code 130 Industrial .Park 4 ' 166 `peak 'Hour (of adjacent' street AS Pear, our o adjacent wstreep ENTER 10 .EXIT` Oenari o I Rohe Change: tr: l etas i sores zoned. shopp :� centers at . coverae approxiatei . i sa T 'hand se Code 820 .. peak, 'dour o� a" went suet � pa o o ada+en street . V cenatio 2 antes hotel plus 4 acres retail 10 ► Po All-Suites Hotel, ITE COd e 310 (All suite, Codo 311, has limited 855 VPIO cent street) Ate Peak Hoer (of a , ant ±nt street) "us 43,600 sq ; . Retail , ` ITE Code 820 ADT 3992 VPP Pt4 ,Peat. Hour (of adjacent street) 362 YPH 177 ENTER 185 EXIT AN .Peak Nor (of adjacent IT otal s; for SCe.oar o 2 AADT' 48 . 1 ' N" R o .. ad agent street), 41 PK ea Hour 2,0' EXIT AM ►. Hour cif adjacent street 65 P 92 ENTER 41 gOALS AND POLICIES rt hens ve odes a n er of 9oa" ' ao col icier which �e Tigard Cow Plan ��'� ��r below: .., l i oable to this ,proposal ach resse a d ; soy sled. ale applicable C1 SNA MA IN TAI AN ONGOING C I EN INV LVEMEN ` Poi is 2 1 1 ,, ,ASSN T EN N ID O AN OPPORTUNITY TON INVOLVED tN A1. PHASES. P ING PROC S " Et C s P�a� A .+ea v ure ensure �:� 'r�th= th o/itY. • A 4 / This policy is 4Xplir ltl t by tie proposed change since ` Job rea : use of the site �r�� diversify .the ob '��+�� in the support existing a businesse . The cottinued industrial designation of the site would not facilitate itc development and, hence, would, not be consistent with this polity. Po' cy 7.1.2. °THE CITY SHALL RE UIRE AS A PRE - CONDITION. TO DEVELOPMENT' APPROVAL THAT e. DEVELOPMENT COfCiDE WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE :1ERV CE CAPACITY INCLUDING: PUBLIC P PUBLIC SEWER (MEN O EL ENT ON �ERTIC TANS `S HAL MDT.., BE . LLOWED ' rVAIN THE CITY); . STOW DRAINAGE. b. THE FACILITIES ARE: 1. CAPABLE PROPERTIES AND E PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HTR'ENNG OF '' .. , UATEL SERVING . ALL f AND 2. CtS SN D TO WY STANDAP9S . ALL NEW DEVa OF ItNT UTILITIES TO BE PEACES DN ►ERC s" . "' tthis i The; above review of p�tbli�� se:""'#1'i�'� =a and utilities show �t� 'p Y t" 'mete policies 8.1 .1. sTNE CI 'T ` SHALL 'PLAN FOR A: SAFE RDADNAY S TS ..THAT � !'S URRENT NEEDS ANt? ANT C' . PATEE FARE GRDNI" t AND D Y 8:. T1.1E. PROV DE FAR EFFICIENT t ANAGL IEN ' iE i y M A TRANSPDRI`AT'DN P�.,ANNINC PBDCES , C PENAATI N WITH D FEDERAL METROPOLITAN AREA T��RDDGt� C STATE, REGIONAL: D LOC L 3UR 1 8. 1. *TNt CiTT APPROVAL THA LL. E Q IRE A A. PREC01401TION TO LO DEED ENT AB- AO' A. E ACCESS APED BT` TNT A 0 TED ERE tH STREET NOIVIDD ALDEVELOP��S PARTIC1'ATE IN DE JNRVEMET EXISTING' STR t , ttIRBS EXTENT � AND SIDEWALKS' TO `D D TAE „'E'Ei n`rlw IMPACTS; rtN t 114PritICairs. BE MADE AND. STREET SIGNS. ;DR. I IALS Pb �. CREATE OR � �R THE DE�'LOPNENi` IS mum TO RC►1� a�EO NTEN� tFY P, TRAEfIC HAND, �►! SHELTERS 8 . TRH "i$ I T SOPS . , OHS t a PR E PROVIDE! WAN TH 'P PDSEQ USE A TYPE 'WHICH GENERA ES TRANSIT RID sine !4" ING SPACES BE SET ASIDE D NARKED nit. CARDS 'DPtR4T D BY,. DISABLED PE SONS THA' . THE `PACES` . D"E w� ATEa AS CLOSE A SSIDLE O. SHE ENTRANCE DESIGNED PESO N B DEDICA t : ID OWL 'DICY LE /P I i EDESTR 'CORRIDOR IN A(COt ANCE WITH 'K AN.* ADOPTED N n Sacco • any l t �affit stne, shows that the. anticipated cor ercial use A ,tted by the 'roadway stem. �� the site tan be, �ccz�nd� � Y � Street frontage, improvements will ►e incorporated into the site development. Sec . tion 2: 2 � Identifies the I nter t of the Pl ? with respec to ,con :rc�i a'l I areas Each 'point is addressed as fOildidt s rc.i a areas be psi anrted at a stile ahl' ch" related is 1t 'on, site ,1 Come and type of stores to tt ,re Utile are tO o, e .. .., .. � .. �� s �n size is a i��al size Tha . p�`� P. � � �a� �Qasea t� ��e �x a+�ret bo � ��t ` a a will ..,pe, and I,o � n siness c� its' �ha add ace the general p }.tbi i , by way 'of the major traffic routes in the -area, surrounding r'sldert tlai. areas be pre teeted any 'possible adverse; aftomits I n terns of lost. of url lacy, noise*, hts and glare,* * There Ate nib .surrounding 'resldentia areas., rc; ..... � al centers and uses be aesthetic 1 attractive and "� ascape The e!�entoa; s t + .W.. .. �� tr�� went ��i ans �I�i l be..s�tbect to Site Plan evle�►i A .. � .. � ti o ltaza�ds i4 , I gress and egress !tits not create traffil o f ges n er e ac i traffi :goy thous: that the system can aoc ate the pang n use +. tri p ret�C.e lath � n tens o 7the, len �� total rev' f ti �.�n �� '� .; �.rG��. �sh�►rten.�r� �G[ii �T�YYV ��#.7�11 T re 1 ocat . o f �h a r opos ente , s ,» o area. h isiness s well as he public the q "ii commercial areas 'Linear" Commerci l° Locational CrIter Spacing and Location (a;) Th0 pr POt site has not abutting .resident° a1 area» (2) Acco � » • • The existing , atrti "clpated imp o 'ei nts can st � ��' �►` + aril acc�xte the propos retail use, . w nd Avenue, Which #guts the .site, is de st nat; hi a or collector. Public t* nsportat- o a: (3 ) Chary cter 1stkos », an ideal t acrt a The sic aere a hotel /sot) yet cente , or a + enara> re +center, fib) The site has excellent visibility fro Ferry Ro *d, atd S W 72nd Avenue. (4) acct The scale 0 at acrs 1s to the subs VI n ,st 'i a , eve 'pp nt 'tr to Hover, It is an pp t+e t ' e . eet uses . 111%.4. 4 �* a , a nt es s_ ,eat , s , kn1 t to the rte �. is pre+ ,fnatei a , st a only si ,atr s to ast tat ae which or deveio a.s ppssi,h a rr' ! ELOPMENT CODE section 18 22.040 of the Code provides criteria review f zoning mar ndnts a The preceding discussion show that the proposed. Plan chant consistent � n � � n� ��o �� Plan policies, and the^efQrel the corresponding �g map n g a l appropriate. 2 The Statewide Goals are addressed in a fo'flowing section. ►, The Code purpose stater ent of the -G District i s addressed; below. " ate vicinity of tht site has substantially L. since adoption of '4he comprehensive Plan and on i ng. Recent co raerci a1 devel opzents in '8�he City of Tualatin reinforce the comet rcial character of the area, whitt extensive intlustrial development in the City of Tigard has established a substanti ai pulati oo base to b‘.4' served by co erc al development 'f the subject site. section 18.62.010 provides a stater nt of purpose for the District 'The purpose of the general tomercia l areas is to pro. de for major retail , odds and. Cervices The uses classified w a came_ra l c involve ., . drivr n .ervti►es a � space users, .,t1on a service, !bo esa e, and repair services, or provide services to the traveling p b dc'f The: uses range frog aotomobi a repair and services,, su ply and egu;ip : t stores, vehicle sales & end dr to -in restaurants; to l aundr est;?'l i hments and • i,t Hit intended that these. 'use's col' ector' •street . The proposed site, provisii t.s will be var et of retail' acti the r:haracterist ; ate tt major tr. a fic r s fit travelling pu l c a es acent` developed 41,1 Hte. nts isistent with this p rp se s :des will •be acct........ ,ate which w . . co in the purpose statement. The s' prop ding ,conven. ent atwce as the s rr ►und • buusinest .r� lc, Y. V4.- STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS Ve�a� tate�igoals apply t this change 1 n the Tigard hensive se � statewide � _ ��' + `{an Is met through the City' ,1* odment review met by the City s exi ting Comp rehe s, v Pl a and 1 °ts Irev eW and update pr 2c' i res 004 met by the proposal since 'fit a arr, econoMically and ew►nenic activity viable use of the situ �rhleh, will enhance employment In the area. eat since ►ll pub! e available to the site a+ )►date the 'P°cpbsed "" ca the transportation system can s t slue trans P� wnew,al use 4 Ray -w tla Patcs • " ' IOARD, OREGON .2tng,Ewzrj=.jstt,Atg-:vt:.. -atimao#4.1...-Apazat • CXTT OF PO Boy 239 Tigard, O; egos 9722:} - (503) 639 -4I7I 1. GF24 L INFORMATIoN PROPERTY MDDRESS /LOCATION _ . '".','2.! =``; T sac MP MW TAX LOT NO '' too /-700 S SITE SIZH ... 40.4, PROPERTY .r - .. OwNEt� /REED RC��.DFR. . �i.Nr� -�t 11 PHONE /4. ADDRESs CITY APP'LICANT*' F, T[ct tt moire stowswrisaprarowsolv.• .�. PiONL Afk at Cla F 44 i tit w hr1 .. i.. .....�w ,. IP. *Whet the, over: nnd the appl taut, ate different Leo..ie the a_.. p set of tito'd p p ., � ppli+cant must `be the +�� or a leases is pbssettion, Itith ittert aut of tetion ftots the o4-aet tit an, agent of the owner sith to 3ttthotitatlon,.: Theo et(s) 'sett nign, this m iat the Space on page too of �►pplicatio 11 .it.. at trittteo adthoriratiot with this,application, PROPC)SAA SRfli The raet recora, of the art tequestt a, 'Cop' ' rehentive P'l.eu A applicable) fro and a Zone t ao,g Jett prperty !ndment tit i1a 0 The apinl .ca nt re b ts! to, Luse. c z +ent. to the f#I' vse % ti of the Comprehentiv'e Plant or Commuti e e op e-at ' .a "e ........ ....,. P 23P ewe d.t 5 FOR STAPP USE ONLY r CASE NO OTHER 'CUE NO'S: R:E IEIPT NO.... APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: ,.... ,_:. D "Et i Application elements submitted (A) Application fora (1) (B) Owner's ;ignatare /w itten: authorritation C) Applicant's statement (pre"`"app Check :c iiat) 0D» Piling fee (i ')'� �, it onai inf orsaatib'n far C• onpre -' yin h, Ave �'. ' ' p ,Aiaenents / ?',ae Changes CI) Map* itidiesting prope rty location (pre-app check list) List +of property Willett and addresses ` t thin 250 feet (1) Assessor's I4p (i) ) Title transfer instrument (.1) P) ATk DE1 A OECisION D;► #1414/ZONE DES E EPLETE t ON t Rum aett ii ng C scion Appt al Da Date:: con+ irlLon* Litt ,�n�" walCia�nce � as pail .oi ;totaie ap wi ca't a r °tier land use TO have a Couple apoi cation 4oa mill used Ito ,an "4 icr'i a the attached infOtaation shee aft appacatiotp. does :. not... viola e ms + a'��a�a�t re eaest� deg �.. ttaehOd to o is ' Iced a on the �;+nb tie aFli+totiaa its gt`anted, b+c .appiican '' granted . n atcotda ct With the tees and *eh, ee limits n* 'the xpp roval All o the above atate>e nts and the stat nt* ezhib is ttansaiitted; . attachment*, � aian pp1icanta w ao acknowledge that any petstit iss app,i,L cations, may be ievohed ii ,it i t found that as false The applicant has Lead ti a entire Contents of tibias to 414,1 ons odetled r/ + this t *itki ►nS ez+tcise ts to al 'the coalitions and the p,; .ici+es and, earite and 'understands Or clnying the application. lot ext.: 464 the based On thin afire, suit stateseai S of each owner (ego hushand add vi' trait !mss FROK: TLgard P an Ling Departoeft ' Wit 00-6602 BThGH N/S X**usx A r*gUest :for a ►ror ►1 of. a tom= Com 're :ens,ivve P)a '9 the hand uee de�segnaton from ;cwt Cdr'. n �laaenrteaent to, char`, +� t (IJ.ght Industrial) to C-G (Cener a ., Commercial) and: tb change the taring delig titan fr+ s X- I to . 9� ,(tight Industrials 14,0ATtoK tetween Sit 72nd !l ,venue and Xntarstate 5 and south of the Oregon Bueiness Paris oglorat 231 13AD, gait lot 1700' Attached is the site Plan and aapticant o e etatem eent for yo r review. Froe information, supplied by var� p and. from other . and, a� en+C��es �i n►foriatiou artailib e; to our e�taii a. r rt and g +otte d... n �► .:. eai in the, ion. 'a►�.1i be a deci�io►n wtill. b rendered 'bn the propo . . rb�n a . prepared, and near futrr tyre Ii you wish to ,comment thcea application' row�:dead$hel�r o by g. : to 4 �.99+�. 'Y'o'u ray 'uAe, tie, >apa D . attach. a se. .ate tetra . , :: ao nn ate lease ratrn 3r ,+coe� ante. �� unable ...to a •• irict. � the ataove:.. • phone . the mated, ielcr + eerat .ons r as soon an ' es ' ile. �E awes en � nd +tns v e"rith +ntemesents { co�ee�tsr in writing. po � . bit g� , a inin ep ��Jit, ,Box 23397;, 13133 $ir t��.s eatt�er, contact the '��. aid Pl Salt ;�;1:r'' t., tigard,, b 97223.. DATE. arm cottradr Jerky Otter Ptri As S =rim Ts* FOratowING =US T APPLY: ha. ve reviewed the so p& Hai and have n.. o o:, beon nn to P1eae; :contact our o tics„ Please refer to' the enclatled lett Written ►t�s:�,�,�, `'+i,!�r, :..' '... * ..., fi MAR-14-'00 14:28 T 2A H1 bik) to TEL NO :S032976058 4,, maalia*ST ICR 0314/15WINI #9/2 P02 -1.07 PROM: Tigard Planning Deportment RN* CPA 90-0004/Z0N 90 m-CY02 BINGHA1(/5PIBXBR A request for *PProv01 of a Comprehensive Plan A4vendment to change the land use deetanation 2rom (iht Industial) to C.4 (General Commercial) and to Change the Otining delgignatibm fro L to 0-G6 tONAt I4 (Light Industrial) LOCATION* totween 5w 72nd Avenue and Interstate 5 and south 4f the Oregon Businees Park CRCTB 251 13AD, tax lot 1700) Attached is the site Plan and applicantos statement for ytax? r� Law. Prda information supplied b variona departments and agencies and frog other information available to out staff, a toport and recommandttion will be prepared and a deolgion bs randerei 04 the piropbsti in the near future. If you wish to coWment on this applidation, We need your clommeste by MAFs 19, 192 q. tou nay utire the splice provi4.1,sd below or Attach t separate letter to return your 0c:emeriti", /1„_you are vtltii/Icto.,,Itipainonti,_))yt11. above_dattle Plea** phone the *tat contact •noted below with your cOmments and Confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you has any questions reggratrig this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department' PO Sog 23307, 13128 elt Hall Btvd., Tigard, 0 972234 PRONat 639-4171. STik-PE* CP,NTAcT* giaggxsaLlat PLIAsa bligtit tHlt ',aLLoparmo ITIEWS THAT APPLY* — htVe. reVitOod the proposal and have no objections t� it. Please contact of our office, Please itefer to the enclosed letter, Written Comment*** %It ,o4t 1 et, bkmicta, 0444ointilt w.wid , tt5.1At the - , 4. ,„. • 63,19,090 13,53 228 1285 p3/19/90 11 tP5O3 1,28 i/85 MSA/HE, • 444 0 fidAILLI:rli-A11111ALIkiii1SAIONAPiLYILI ANALLIEULAUMAVIIIMISAIIiRni AliLaso. 0.0o - 0.12 - 'POOR PROGRESSION" ��O�" 0.13 • 0.24 "FAR RSSTO! 0.25 • 0.36 - *6000 PROGRESSION 0.37 - 1.00 'GREAT PROGRE SUt w Amthigaixx 1, +�0 � 0. � N. PHASE* 0 *INCREASE N�1. T1lN�tl! .93 0.70 FINE T IIN6 NEEDED r 0.69 ''.M' Q w 00 • 1AJOR DES F.E0 Qw LOS TOTS. �!�u►�r C T& R 52.0 ' 10.0 < 0' * i'S NCR uIl i. 4t or it zed • Ysh good del AT T I GARD �c di s D. Lower 'Booties Ferry/Mid E. Lower Boonts, 1st F. Lower B►OM$/East 1 -5 I/'C a. Lower Booties NO Rd. A.N. pot wa ,'cIGMLIZED PROZRESSION LT RT � LT AVG� Y%C EFFICIENCY jai at lir' AO �.. �irrrr� riwrJiwr • :P.N. PEM SIGNALIZED I UH��' L%ZE� Boone0 Ferry /l'2nd /C *it ' a► nes f EMa t c • • Ip 03/'19/90 11:01 l®P503 228 1285 II aA" I 44 C IlY OF T t UMW kit ''RI,Z D. Lower 110onds FFrrr, A' E. osier ones sty I.5 I/! F. Lower ilooliesiEest 1-5 1/C 4. Lowery r 0000$ Ewan Rd. • 11.:17:- r Winos Ferry /72n4 E. to Soo !o I- /4.. Lowey 1Ss /E ;5t :tit, Attittotwatt water 1�fwr ii► �s,yr, wiihw t. ae tr .1 9/ X:02: 3 228 128 WA/l 4 ,EAK NOOK SIGNALIZED PNOGGZSSICN BYO V /C 1.0 S c t 1C J E': Y 19.', 0.75* ►.4 0.700 16.2 0,12* 0 284 4:91* 0. L r ones Ferry/ 2n E. Lower onrs/Wist I- 1/C L ones /East 1 -5 1%C G. Lctar os cEwan Rd. 0 Low 866fteit oo.. its /W *st 1.#„5 lit F. Loot $00044-'0 1t, I., I/ ; r t s/ Ewwn 0d. , " tAKNOlift t RT LT Vt V/C .0.S. EFF CIE Y 1 :02 1285 1ti1441:1! TY OF TIGARD Lowtt on s irr, /120d • E. Low r s /.4 t 1 I/ . F. Lowe ins /rut 1$ 1/ Loot Ioon /NCEWE Rd. A.I. PEAK WAIN UNSIGIIALIZEO SIGNALIZED PROGRESSION LT FIT AV i Vit L.O.S. EFFICIENCY • 20.1 0.16* C 15.4 O.10 *, i.6 0.94* 0. 26.5 X0.91 *` + ' 4. tit 4, INF T 0 ST FOR COMENT5 :� ° t'��/"'► DATE: March 8„, .1990 .... 1c 7 'ROM: Tigard Planning Department' ,..E : - - . 90,-0002 $I'NG /S IERE land gUea for n approval t .a, RE: CPA 9C� Oi34� /�nN �' R A re a "" Comprehensive ? d. ent to change the lan tx g 20014,4 L (tihtt�a d �atri. t) to .. C (General Commercial) and to change t,:. (Light �� a designation from I -t to C-»G.. zoNI X.-L (Light Irtdtiatrial) LOC TIa% Between, S`r 72nd Avenne and TnteratatP S and south of the of germ Rusli ess Park (toll* 251 1 Ab, tax lot 1/O0) Ate the, . . plait aid a PP ll�ant a etatenent br your r iew* e In fc►rmtioz efPP l� d tY de attmehte and agelttiee hd ftbm ctht i htdtiaaatiOn available to but satte a report and rei`:ommendatibn w 11 repared and a deciaion w& i be tei'144 .t P .. ' . the k ' � � ture* wish to tom tent on t. ie a." .licati p ., on 'tbe rb °. , sa X: in the near ai If �n wi. uae. the a ace ...v#.ded lea M� to h a �ie,�arate �ett+�.r�,...., x99+0 YOU may ' P trowth your co ntit VOU aue 1y i naba to -. tes ej d _ ..g e abo ve ate , '" the staff contact noted e lbw iaith your cOMMe to aid ' tb i ror 9 possible,* y ga. ..,.g bcaa�n a, Ln. write Sid c AA aeon as ®eible� If you haver an gtxeetbna reg�ar matter; cbntaot. the Tigard Planning bepartment, Pd, tot t. 233970 1112,E ,sail Blvd 0 Tigard, bR 97122., Pg0Y t X19 -4171 TAEF CONTACT: ...'err _..offi PT'R*5E cab- THE rot.toWIgc ItEMS VHAT APPLY htve reviewed the perVosal and have no objections t+b it PLANNING DEPT, of out ofa.Ll Please: refer tb the, enol' eed letter Mitt E todimehta . MAR $.199q ea Phodo R umber ' 1 TO: 3 1PRGMs Tigard Planning Department DURHAM mot 919S0 CONNINTS f ,EC tVED DAM March 8,;x..1994 R9: CPA 90 -»0004 /ZON 90 -0002 SXMOSAM/SPXXXIIR A reJltileflot for approval. of a Comprehensive Pla , ndm nt to change the land usa designmton ,f ron 1- . w ... - cial) and ri o change the toning (tight Industrial) to t._,� �C�w�,�oral. Commercial) d.sigm att n f* orn., X -L to . ,. SOWN,: 1 L (Light I�.duatr ) LOCATION: 8.t weren 6W /2nd Avenue and Interstate 5 and mouth of the Oregon Business. Park (PICT* /si 13AD, tax lot 1700) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your' ravioli,'rca ' pplied by Various departments and a ,"►cias and . n, other ini+�rmmeatioma� eu ,ir fo3.ymation available to our staff, a riiltiort and recommendation ' 11 be prepared and a decision wi ro red on the propoao.l in 4 he near future. . 11 be �►de If You wish to comment on this application, mad your comuseta by Al, 19. Volt may tune the 'Spade, p:c y ;.dmd below or attach a separate letter to return . coO ments. . d e please P hone the to ff contact rotted below with your comments and confirm your comments comaents in Writing Po y � y questions rardin this tatter, contact the �i ate Viannlnq Department, 2 39'x, 13125 SW Hail B1vci. Tigard, OR 97223. Vt0W e; 639-4'171 STAFF CONTACT PL!lsi ar- Tffi PoLLCWXNG /TEM T AT APPLE We have reviewed • the proposal and have no oIbject,tons to 1.t. 'fir . Please. cosxtac Plearaa refer to the anclosedd letter. mitten dotament,iit .. wswer office. of Peracin Cent; ti SXM HSA, I; 444 CITY OF t CARD 141001 PLEAS DELIVER THE FOIL COMP C IIIINIERt SPE4tat 121S: moor AY i Main $ E 'ALIMT OM M, ERIA _ £EE1 JENCY 0,,00 - 0.12 - "POOR PROGRESSION" 0.13 - 0.2 - "FAIR PROGRESSION"' 0.25 - 0.36 . "GOOD PROGRESSION" 0.37 - 1.00 - "GREAT EGRESSION''' IANM . 0,99 - * IN EN PHASE" - 0.70 - 'FINE TUNINGNrt D 0.139, 0 00 - "OR CHANGES ME .1c „r TOTAL, E'F1„y CRITERIA D s 6S 0 6.5 <Os19.1 19.Z4 0 f32.5 D 32.5 < D 1 52.5 52 *0 4 O s 78.0 P t.O 4. D .►! The y, iC 1. k i ate age ve i 1 . atop dst ay I , f ,t ran .. �. TotaI 1 4Y b a factuA,4 of 1 . SIL .' Oka ti EXIST D. Lower bores Ferry/72nd E. Lower Boones/W'aa t I' -S IA: F, Lower i oene's/Eezt 1 -6 1/C G. Lower Boones/McEwan.Rd. D Lower Bowles Ferry/72nd E. Lower Boors /West I -5 , C; P. Lower Boon�es/East 1 -5 I, C G. Lower - Boones/McEwtfi Rd. A *N. L P HOUR UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED T R` _ k AVG VC 0.69* « ,► 15.4 0.69* . � 14.2 0.89* 464- ► 28.3 0.91* A.N. IhSIGIMALIZED T RT LT MINOR MINOR ,MAJOB 41 .4:4444 Vic fo ne'd PROGRESSION .0,� S►'. EFFICIEICY 0.31 0.31 0.31 (19.5) l) B C F HOUR ~ SIGNALIZED PROGRESSION AVG 11/C L.O.S. EFFICIENCY DELAX 19.0 0.6V 18.0 0.76* 13.6 • .0.95* 34.3 •0.23* 2i.4) A.N. PM NOW ONSIGNALIZM SIGNALIZED PROGRESSION al i iv . t RT LT AVG V/C L 0 S. EFFICIENCY ► 4/ 6 i. ICS, i De Lower Boones Ferry/72n6 .,.. ....R F. Lowery /East I- 1 c ... ,. 5.5 4 G. LoWer 16.6 0.96 8 � 0•31 Wines EW40 Rd. •... 20.5 0,91* iS��.IY... AO. �P SIR . , ... , . EN ., ItNA IZEJ 'PROGRESSION ,�.ST,� �l1Dl��'R�'�,. , � 1.1`. .tip �,� ......� � �»"� �, E��I�,G �� . I 1 . tomb nee forty /124d i._ f', tower BoottettEttt. L r Neone West -5 Z r G. Lower 0rl s/$CEW3l R4 _ 4 St OAS* SN QA A.4 PEA Wilt UNSI+ '(ALIZED SIaALIZECt Avc .x T �aCE�tO EFFICIENCY D. Lower Vie* FerP;,'/720d' E. LoWer Boonesisett 1 4 lit F Lower Boolnes /East 1.6 1/!C G. Lower ones/MCEwsn Rd. �II�Al3Rl111cat„� IOI ��11111 � � YI/�F►� 1�1�1�1� A�riwNr w.iYl'4� � .r.r+�i►' 19.1 0.75'► 0.31 15.4 O.70* 5 0.31 15.2 0.92* 8 0.31 28.4 0.91* C (20.0) A.N. ISEA* IROW PROGRESSION LT RT LT Awe /C L 0.S. FrICIE Y , D. Lowe Bowies Ferry /72n+ .. � � w:.. .. -.. 2640 O.�° D 2$ • E. Lower Boone tWea t I'c, I/C �. ».. ... ,.... 185 0.81* 9 0.28 Lower Bo.. �.+1y ■**■ 1 . / * _ ,. ot�e� 1M�� i�� I�'� � ++.�w..;. oriti4i�� ..mira�c� '* i'� � ?14 �:� � � 0.28 G cw }er Booties Mcto #n. Rd. .. :;. , -.. 54.4 4493* 2341) + for coo tr�,ltied 110 • D. Lower 0oorls Forr,Y 72nd' E. Lower Roones/IW. st 1.5 1/C F. L4Jer pones /Eest 1 -$ I/C G Lower On•s /MCEWon rid. / • A.N. PEAK WW1 NIMSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED PROGRESSION RT 1.T AVG Vie 4 . S r EFFICIENCY 0.31 g 0.31 0.31 (20.2) ..... ,�__ _.... ' 20,1 0.76* arws:.. wiw.J f.�wrr 15.41. wwrr �.'ws.b C.100 + 15.6 0.94* -►_ _.. ... 10.5 0.91* D. Lower Boones Fey , /72nd E. Lower Rooney /West I -5 I/C F. Lower goones /East 1 -5 1/C G. Lowee Boofles/McEwan Rd. */ Mott'!onso A.L !PO% HOUR UNSNALIZED SiBLi 0' . PROGRESSION MG V/C LOTS. EFFICIENCY aiikaa d... mearisA 20.4 11.92 *' • C 18 *4 0.00' 8 14. 0.8+5# 34.. 0.93* k :s 0.28 0.28 0.2: (22.41) a • • —_A • • "M cammoorra DAM PROM: Tigard Pls. fining Department RSx CPA 90- 0004/ZoN 00-0003 NGiukM/SPIENER A aqu ei t for approval o.. a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the lan't ► us* designation from 1.4 (Light lndustri el) to (General Commercial) and try Change the Boni 9 designation from 1 -L to ZI t: I-1, (Light, r'ndustrial) Tto:N: wren SW 72nd Avenue and Ynterstate '5 and south of the Dragon Business Park (Ocamt 261 13AD tart lot 1700) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant' s statament for yodr review, prom iniarmataon su pplied b departments and, agencies And from t har information n pare available to our star will be and a decision will, be rendered on the ro cvaeaatndation w ,p dal in the near future, 1990 Y`ou�, may � space _ � ._y ..ommrent on this a lic•ation, heed your Cc ata by r Wish i If :.11i, 11�!.i�ih to h o ' separate �___.,�..3 ,�. vid�ac ��+�� or att�ich, a fee rate, letter to ass - the nahlie � es return your corene u h he.: above Abotre _s�ate1 please phone the sttffi contact noted below with g possible. if you have your ,. your cow s and, confirm �� comments writing as soon. as questions regarding Comelt this natter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, Po Sox 33397, 13125 Hall blvd., Tigard, OPL 9123. PHONI 639- 171,..' sTpzr T PtEllsz onizet 2as OnteLtNING .,. We have ►e revimwed the ►ropdbal. and haIro fo objections to ii Please cotta of our otEice:, Please refer t� the enclosed latter. Writtsn Commanto . araeoPeon Phone Number t bkm/c Q-04 31 • Hr" tirk .i TO: sl 1 tees DATE: le) 1ROM: Tigard Planning apartment RE: CPA 3a- 0004 /2o►* 90 -0002 BINQ /811.1 IR A roAtteat for approval of a Ccm , . ` ,.change he. land ` u,ie deeig atLc from X-L =,ahem %'e Plan Amendment to t (Light Xndwetvial) to C' (General Commercial) and to change the zoning d C-•G4 f4Nf i » I'd I► (Light Industrial) WC&TION: eA� '� y�nil iort from Bety.►sen SW 72nd avenue and Into state 5 and south of the Or0,y n Business Park (Wont .281. 13AD, taxi lot 1700)' v ew► From Attached #.s the Site VIA= and appl�:cant's s+�at+a�'nt for ar,�,� ;��,r i o information supplied by various d ntr and aganciia and from other inforeation available to our staff' a report and recommendation will be p; eepare i and a decision 'will ire+ rendered On tbe, pri4estial in the near future. If your wish to comment on tht: application, we need your comment* by war, 8, 1 , t'tr to �` t + � . a e n . separate l+�t return �o. ooemenes the spade provided below s • nd *ao tl� a%o tom, please . , to ►* With. yOur m , cur^ �ovmeComments soon as possible. 1f , ou. have 4 nta �.n writing as Y any cpu+astio�ts� reg��.�g, t�t�� staff contact noted this matter, contact the Tigard g ig Planning Department, PO : Box 23301, 13t125 SW' Ball, Blvd., Tigard, OR 07223. PHON 639- U. STAFF CONTACT .,. PLIA3M uzcK , 'OL /N 17 .i. E`uT413 ;ii3AT AP APPLY: have reviewed the ' proposal and have no object On:: o it. lease contkkct of orb office a ti MA 0 6 1990, r` : easa: refer to the eti + lolled t Writ den Cont a .... e I tL" P''', '' /OR 03101111100 fiA.! I)ATIE FROM: Tigard Planning De sent, .VA 90r- 0004 /zoN 90-0002 svilailAm/SPtslutit A request for approva.1 of a Coa rehe oei ve Plan Amendment to change the land use designation ►tion tram I Light Industrial) to General: Coeadmroinl) ano. to chi nige the eohth deeigna ion from I -L to.6.0. solos I-L. (tight Industrial) LOcatioNt Between ' 72nd Avenue and, Interstate 5 and south of the Oregon, Business Paek ; OCTM 2S1: 137th, tax ' lot 1700 j Attached is the Site Plan and aay4 p1icant's statement for your review. From information supplied by varioUs departments And agenoiee elm from other information available to out staffs a .report and recommendation Will be, prepare! *rid tt decision Will be tendered on. the proposal in she neat lutute If y'ou winh: �to coat on th a applioa Lion we need � , .writ by 19.2 E tort may use the space provide. d below or a'ttao . a ae rate let et to :teethe* Your co eenta. f VoU,are unable to respond by :the . above , date., plea.. Ikon. the Et f contact noted below,. with yout comments anc"l, oonfir a lid' carte in writing as soon as possible. • If yott have any c ueetionn teqtrdiuq tuts matter, oonte t the Tigard. Planning Department, Po Otis 23107t 13125 SR Wall Blvd. �, Ti, asp:; ;� ,.,, +q Ott 9i223 '!Rt?21Es. £394171 supra Cot TAC' _ 'err coffee' PLEAS CRS= `TH FOLUMING ITSH4 1 AT APPLY* We havo reviewed the ;proposal: and have Lap object .one to its lease contazt of our Office: ,Pieaee refer to the enclosed fetter. Written Caentr ,..,.. Of Pets* Phone bklicli 0-0 d6 DAT Planning Dopar'trent A 90- 01004/Z0N 90 -0002. , BINGH } / PIETMR A ' request . for ai proval of, a os aprehenEsiva` P1ai Amendment to chanige the land use , designation fro ®;'Light Yndu13tria.1) toy G -G (General Coxtsmercial9 ' gad to change the zoning design& i sin ,froze p-nL tt 04. '$ONE 71, -L (Light. Industrial) i,.0CATD »! Hetweet: SW ' 72nd Avenue and Xn terstato 5 and s nth of the Dregon ,Busi1 eea Park jW 1fi. 2S1 113AD, tax , lot 1700) Attache is the Site Plan and applicant ° s statement for your review. From infor at,114n sauppUed by various departments and agencies and from other infuriation . available to our staff, a report and recommendation.' will be ,prepared, an a decision will be rends zed on the ;proposa3. in . the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your cents by Mar. BD ag.9,.y.• , ' a a y use the space p rov CCd below or attach above Separate letter r to return your comments. ©u ae urab]e to ress � b3 4 ateA , please phone t'Ae staff ; contact noted below with your comments and confirm your commits, in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO: Box 233970' 13125 SW Hail, Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: ' 639-4;171. STAFF CONTACT: &Terry° PLEASE CHECK, THE FOLLOWING XT EMS THAT APPLY We have rt(E viewed the ro oea1 and 3 it. p �- have no objections to i Please coni;wact Please refer to" the encl.os ed letter. Written Comments: nts a Name of Person Coin dent ing � .T e ' P. Miller, Admi n s ti a t r Phc ne Number OM ` Tigard Plann .hg peparo* t ,700.04 /stow , GINGHAM /SPIEKER A request for approva]. of .. prthenaiva Plan MuSiidmetit : to change tae land use deli nation from' .7 -� (Light I duatria ta, C": (Genera1 om aer�°ia1) and c'hange ,the ,zoning designation from, 1 -11. to C -G. ZONE: -L (Light Industrial )' TION: ,Between SW 72nd Avenua and . Interstate . 5a' and south' of the Oregon Business:, Park (W 4 261 13AD,' tax,: lot 1700) Attached .s they , Site Plan ." and applicant's e statement for pit= 'S o rev3,aW., . Fgc�u,• information a, uppliee.1 by various L. partmente and agencies and f :on other' lea €brmatior "available to our staff, 'a report ' and recalw?,adation; Will be ;, t ared ,and et decision will be rendered on the 'prrapais ,1 in the near future: /f you tlinh to comment on this application; we need your comments by Maser, 19901. You may use the space provided relow . or attach a separate letter ' to' return -your moment ent - L :bona are unable to read by the►'. moves d 4,1_pl please. a. p n , your c®m iente and confirm your phone the staff cF',)nt�d:'� soon as ss!ble. you any o! cc�a�n�:® in writing as a noted below with y°u have an .�aetions regarding 9 � I� thitt matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, p0 Sox 23397, 13125 SW Hall. Blvd.. , Tigv d, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 - 4111. STAFF CONTACT: ,ge :.t2 Cl$ er CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS TWIT APPLY. W have reviewe<J the ' propoaal and .!lave no ob j ectiore to ti te.. �,,�,,, Please contact of our office. Pleas refer ter," the enclosed letter. X69 ; Phone _Numher: .. bkm /CPA9O --04. 13103 OAT: Tigar43 Pla 'g ,Depar°tnent CAA;. • '90- 0004/6ON ' 90 -0002 BThG ° ttp,r,,EIER A , ?ea ueet for, approval oE, a ., Compreher i ve 'Plan ? en daient to change ; the land .use de dgnlation fry, I (Light Indo kStr3 a1) to C- ' (General co! nercial) k;and to change-, ,,the ' zoning designation from T -L ,to. C.4.1, ZONE: I-4#* (Light Xnduatrial) L0 ,;14.cN: Between SW 72nd Avenue ano . Interstate . 5 '.'and . south of tho' Orogon wusinOsS Park (=TN 2S1 13AD, tax lot 1760) Attached ie the Site Mac and .appl.3�.cant ®' Statement for your revk�ewo` rose. 'information supplied by various ; departca nt?3 and agencies. and ,From other information available to 'ur sitat1i, a 'report and • reco> endation 'Will be ,prepared and„ "'a, 'a :decision will be sw ndered oar .the' proposal; in the near, future. •If you .wish to dow nr nt on 'tilt:, . a ig .ic do , r ate by ' „ 19987 You may %gee the space below " or attach .a separate letter' to return your comments. ;tf o c aanab1e, tca xea nd ' by the; . abcave dates plea ®e phone the staff contact note's below -' with your co ente and confsrne 'your �, rega rding coent� in writing as coon a,e po®®l.ble. ,Yf you have any �uest3.one this chatter, contact the Tigard Planning Dopartinefit d , 23397, • 13125:. SW Mall Blvd., ;Tigard, OR 97223. ,PHONE: 639.4171. ' ; STAFF CONTACT: Offer OL'ASE ,CHECK TEE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT ,APPLY: We have revieved the' prop O al and have no objections to it. Please refer to the evi 1osed letter. Written Comments:_ Name Of Pelaon Co»a dntitVis �' PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 1: FILE NO: E:OT4EF EHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 90 -04 FILE TITLE BINGHAM/ SP/ERER APPLICANT: SPIEEER PARTNERS 5235 SW ME D0W5 RD LANE OSWEGO, OR 97034 l'ONE MANGE- EC 90 -Q2 OWNER: REQUEREQUEST: A REQUEST APPROVAL A c01PREHETISIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE ST: A FOR fcb��f{`►V 6"6�8J OF LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM I-L (LIGHT IlmUs tl ) To 6 -G (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) AND TO ZAANGE THE 2ONXNG DESIGNATION FROM -L TO C -G. LoATx JAI : BETWEEN SW 72ND AVENUE AND INTERSTATE '5 E$r atdESS PARR (WCTM 251 13AD TAX LOT 1700) SOUTH OF THE OREGON ZONING DESIGNATION: COHPREELENS.LVE PLAN DESIGNATION :' INFO NO 5 CHAIFWERSON: CRAIG HOPKINS PHONE: 539 -58'23 STAFF DECIS N 5IX PLANNING CO MISSION L HEARINGS OFFICER C CITY coUNcIL • DATE 04/031,90 T /ME _2130 DATE /e_ /_„ TII DATE TIME 30 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS (see attached list) RETURN DX ATTACHMENTS: �C VICINITY MAP — LANDSCAPING LAN. Y.0 NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN �... STAFP CONTACT PERSON: JERRY OFFER HPREPAAR FOR PLANNER APPROL XX ADVVRTiSEMENT T1 4E61 ..� ° OREGONTAN / / NOTICE TO PROPERT! OWNERS To EE 'MAILED /; /„ LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION.' /, NOTICP TO DLCH - ATTACHMENTS:' Pease 'Complete (A), rfor Text Amen inienE ►� Summary and Purpose o Proposer descr; :ptiOn of the proposed mo o terms , and stating "see ' attache For Map Amendments Fill Out the �oilOwin+ be changedProvide a separate sheet, if itecessa ax lot number alone,): �M s F"'1`.r ■E r�Designa i.'. Current Plan Dies .gnation P'rOPo e ed ti t 4 } eJ Current Zone �t '4 ro 'os ed ne Locatio or kes ident .aL 1. ch ,Please en$ ty. in Units Per 't^ ��lt Den.. �.� L1ra,E � NOTE: If more copies 9f this form are ne6dedk"' please contac office at 372-0050, 035 this form may be duplicated \, Please be adi.sed that statutes require' the provided A general description of the intended:aa F3aifficiertt. Proposed plan and land use regillatiori:;4me ;prit. to DLCD at least .45 days prior to the ,t1.1a1hearing (See OAR 660-18-020). , a4pttOoSedfc.)ritt sip drawings. , wplans ..sarnple a specific atoris copy of letter change offer,.' details .r._. calcula•.iyras ur ber of copies. Description: J .'For your use For your review For approval .....�..:As requested . .Mailed delivered To be picked ►� Mfld a 0e one k S4. • at r, °, IY N. � r rl ✓.:w. „. . r , >v 1, •t .... � ,., ,, ., . �, r "�� ,, ;�, p.« ,,: . Ir ....., 1 v i- r�r., .,,, .. -, ,, :r v ..1� �.. ,. . '..- r t..» �';, ;. r ., >,:. I ;r.' . , r • -Y .i , r,,," '� e r' .. �` � .. +.:.,,. r h.;:'- • �- ]_, ,,. , ,. .. .',.. ,. ..,., n:. �.: . :. ,. �.:.I r ,.. ..,, , ,. ,. ,. , , , +. � .,, ,, v ,' -. i. > ..- .;, i (.'� �..,, .., °,..: >,. .. • , , ,r 4. r ., ,. .� ., r „: ,., _.I : +;, A:: + f u.. :.. .:. l .. n. _. , ,. , t, r�.. ,•.° ,.,- t a: .. J r .,...,.,,, P. t .- .:,�i'r { i .r1 .;1: 'r'- Yk x 4 / r:. , • R : ° -. `.. l :.,.. rIt .r.. ' , r rof t. ,,, ,•,, t.W,Y r ,+ r ., ... L I ,. , , r I. Y, , r•,!..x it Y nL } •nn' �,rrY. rr!I!.. -.+ y, ., •:. " . �u.. a. ll ,r.M a. 4R r,: -W, � 'e:an U.,. 1' H{ Y ,: ,.sl •r , °.,�.. , r » 1 Y „,._.+ ,,, .�,qrl , •�rv+v'g'�.,i °" ,r ,, ., .... 1 F,,,, }• , _, `- ,,.,.Y.... .. °., .YY � J YI _t." :vr.. .7 .,!�. . -. 1!. . ,„ ,.:.. .: "t•'M.1 ,- w,..:�. .; -:: �. ". r,1r_. ,h+„ r :.,. s1?," J I, 'r!.. r •v J..4 � i:... . d 1. :.. ^rx, , ,, ., n. I r. ¢4 :, ... Y..p, r'.t, !r t .S' ,,;. ,r11,,.,, • ":r , m , „ ..:,; . } ,,._,l{ °j' 1,-T lrr�P�11, ... r ,.t l• ,�:., .rl'. l -..(., ,. % ., ,: ,,{ �, ,,., ,. ,e, Ii �:: ..1,.., i, .i. j�n�1� � :. ... ,,•t ` "� , ,',: ",;;r r , :.', M': a .,IF,..a Jr„ � r 4 a,��r. r I'' �''�il , , r ,,. ::, —�, .,, :. ,. Y I b:,; „; ,.'.� 4,M•, w ;�� .; - , 1, ,: y , 1r Aa. ,�re 71 t l� F V.t w . tt r r i1. •.,, v t r xd,�r - •�, 1 (te ,..'ti 1 .l. vY+, b `, "d 5+ t. t 'ut' '- u ' ♦+ ,1" 1 , L 1 ,t. ,V wr/'fi' .'4 f. � •ry"i�;:, -1 ��•ta �, r ••r •.,� ,, i [,,.: ..' � r ,. � • `.0 ��' . r "" ,k +. .':4 ,:.1 :n {4 -. .. .,. •:,:.... ;,:.r... -,, .. ,..r. :: ":: r" SJ. ,. „ {... ",W!.7 ,. ,• 1 sN:a ,Y.. i !..{+ qrn� r.'YytU++ L, +H= ! •.:. � ,, ; ,, .. sr '�;° ,P�,,r'• �` ,: ,r ,,; y'M\ ,� ] .�:�.'r : ,�::. Y. .:.,.�,r, , ... ,e r.. -r „ i, ,4 ,.. .c- +1 , :...•1 ,. , -: .,.. .., y ... .:. ... .. ... ,..,.� ,.:,: 1 ,.s. w4 5 . ,:.I..:.rY.'. _ ,.. rY .I .: ,.. ,. -.,,.. ,F �,! �� -.. ; . • .,! , rr,. {{ f7. ,r. 4..1 } , ,;j IY. i�± .�. ,P ... .. �� ,- : -. "., :. .. A:I, ,t, �:. i„ }, +4. d t S., j'r�r ,. .r. M ,.. : x , dl ,.. �., :y. 1' ,i .,r 'l:l LAS ":('^ ^� 2-' 11 "r. :I.,., ,,, �..•, 1 ... ;,...,. ...... ,, ',. ,1,iy "h � , ?1i �., ",a Iry.. afl„ ai'Ia ,, K 16.'::°' ,. I,:. "; , , �.. .' "r ,r:,. d, , -.,., yr... u.. ;Y .r. «,^N � "•.. A '.F.} v J' ��- „�•�; .! ,.. ,,.:.Y .,, ,. " .. .. ..- .rn ta: i..., r,.'4.: .e r„ y 4 .t. !''' !, iii 1Y1 ,(!'t�..: ! .y:i 7 �.. : i ,e r x� '' '• .:.a '� �.:'� . r� .. ,4, l �f„v 1.. ` ," .:J h "1 ,,i� „' rl y�'r 1 .y -,t+v1 .1. ,.. C•. IS. i;1. - `T is -� i, { r N r Y•I. _ -: :1 ' 4- T.. ,l l.• t •�. I .Y.,11,r -, , e, a. - -. -t,. d „ 7�+ t� - tt .q J,.i }4 ^,.'., R t�..'�i H :Y. ,N { 1.•:.M/ IY, tiu rrl:1 w r,l, • -}. ?l't 3 5F . Y� .i. 4 �•".Wt� .�;� a :, �`Yr,,�t >: �� tr ,�, ,M� `S r + .,i�Yt4 4.. I�1 ;.ir i . '. 2Y ^ � ° .1J �. P Ck �i: F� �)'4�„ 1 M� ,� :; # -:, ,•. �, :ir"'c (d V1 +r:; :. y •'� s, 1 t J „. r ) . Il , i ,KJ �k v't..,,. + 4 + •MA'R Y A . "�1�: >� 1" .l. 1. Y '`�1Y 1.... :pa•` ii 'ry ,.,:, , +�.4 •,f?� 1 j•, ..I rt II ! ,.J} ,I� ,,N. { }�� 5. ".. t'Ii . r :.,r':. .1: )7 .A :4, + '} r ,^Kq. 'I °'� l "'� , .tP ,�, Y !iq �i � 1 +, ggiA ..1�. !,,,... 1:r:t t 1t� F .j,�,a -�'Y �. � Y,Y:,';.' j. ",... N !„ �P : ' I :;f ' "`t � , cc, .. : , r. r r.,,, .,.. � ,,,I•= ,,.. ,. : , „, I .t ,t„ �::Y, .,, ,,. ,.. , , .t ., .4 ; ,,. , M” 1 ,. {l, .... ,.° -;Y� .,. ... �. :y. ,. -C ,.. ,:; ' -'' 1. ,r.•w :J'' .,r. - a..,.,- .1 I1 ,,.P �,.. _:.. ., ,,. .:, •; :- :i: �I h ,. -'�° i fR4r 14. ,r �1 {,,_ LI I mr::'.w ��.: w. ,, .�_ �, .r, '. -'R + Arr.° Yn', , a, 4";�: V �) r ' '�•,_ � 6 f,.: R, w � rt rr 0 1 ., R ,.. t w+ 1f�y'iJ" . 1.r I 1.1 t � ' � �� IF 7 �•,'r.' -91: ��(/.: ,. al 1 ' L. r .r r W 1 ^r r 5 t'x „J,•:1 r q. i, d, w k .'s3 i�I')II Cc'M ah 't Y y ! ° • 1 + �� `�/�,h.� �,4Y(`j„^� 1r 'cI /Kt y ;3� � �. �,4 i ,:.1 7 4 "•! GY • "1 tii . i` �' �e(• P'� rl _ r ° i t ulb .• , 1 t a � rt T, fl' a. 1 v . �. it 'i h +• r r ,•• i ``n:�:. Y 1 ,1 k� �.; "•y "�,',K t r:. 1) k:115 X 4i + A t 5.11 +, r t +�'.. JJ r 1� rt' ^ + Y 1C �i 1,,,i 1%f ;ti- ��r, ,w, 4 „i h :`�7 ` , ?"'�r IF ^ it `1�, v" i'.• I +« N ' M I r r1:FY , , W , n +• i ': d�° e ! ' \, °a,r n , \ •r ,h, a .. .. ,.r I .. I 1.• ,! • I - t "•''I „ t h li, - 5^�,p ,r, �� r �'� �'�' �.� � ,�':''. . I 4M1 � M JYI m V � .Ml, Y++. r n:T11 t 1 r' •.�'. L�t .11 :d' M�'".! , i 4!C . P ,['!y.rM / ♦F _ .. jj y 4 it ,51 . +{ 1 ,r. ° f� + � -°rr;— ird. l.. , , ..,.. ,.1 /"A6 i'� ) 'ti I ,P ��„ Y..f�' 1' i in tt�`'`,� 'Yj {• J . \ 1 f :" "t: ."' A ey ... .4 . 4 t:/�� ♦rt r 1, V k1 M t U�: r. 'lh; I Yd '1..,.1+y, rt'� .(I �•I�'. f ,�. L, 'N. y�', Y,� ,'u, ,• "`�'11 { ;11:,;,- ,F upl, J. Y 1" '11°f b ,.:M. {tl ry, + ,, l. - 4 r41. I 1 NM'h i Yi I , , "� +1 L., - - - _ - - - e • - _ I e ---= - = - _ . . 1 • t 1J . t 528,1 S,W4 Meadows Road Sthte 131 ,akc Oswego, OR 97635.3227 5O3, 684 -4666 rAXt 503 654 -4667 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] WASHT,NGTON COUNTY, .STATE `Y( ,� B.TNGHPJ1 Ir1VCr free:cif :is rar tees :fhe c cifrc tilly Set .fortlt lierclrrai ,srturiit'd in Washington SEE ATTACHED LEGAL ;IF SPACE INSUFFICIENT, CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE sop -Tile 'd t ° is free horn encumbrances except an easement as reserved i n de,ed � ncl`udi ng terns, d d January. 6 141 Cond�t�ons. es , �e sa. proper , and provi sions thereof recorded � y.' � ` b `� : ,, r � trici�ions and reservations' i ncl ud t ng terms and provisions thereof rt!corde.d 1/6/41; an easement i rlci udi rig + terms and prove si ons thereof recorded November 10, The true consideration ,tor tli s' conveyance Id, Here comply with the requirements', o Dated this 20 dray of une b 19 �8 Washiin ton County; 9 . ngton Personally appeared the above . named v \. ss. June 20 M 1 er M. ©iI ri s and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be Before me: L.• Notary ,%rublic for Oregon; Ivry 'cuto �yssit'∎ expires: vuiuntary acf,and deep %a' +>ttttANTV I)EED Wa s h; ng,to r YY 4,414 EI).1 Co. GRANTEE 5 Ant)iiF;iSY After ti;*.tetding return to: PNT1 265 S.E. Oak Hi 11 sboro;; Oregon F97123 Count►, Of 1 cettrr that; merit tece ved ...day of o'clock' in bui,fr orr it file/reel nuri*, er Reword' ter,. LIzedi I 1 'iixless 'trky.''hr Courtf 4 ii,rF Y 4444 AYY {YwY 1 1:ClY1x� {, a ,xltYl Y Y ,Yy .a. .4 44 44. sOAct RE3Enilib F tlii RECORDitei Lis NAME, Ai5blil' s;:zip Until a change Is rer;iiostecij otI ta* stttterr ants shall be sent to tho following 'dddrasst Bingham I r V astm,�nt Co R Y .Y 38',38..15.,,W,,, St P x YH01 nsa " Jxx {I 4v Pr tandi..bre,4On 91210 Y • Selwyn al 4G4 wY Y 44laf of a m F SCMPTI ON , SHEET ee page I far''vzsting encumbrances, if any. Descrip,ion of the tract of lend •which it the subject of this report: .'',A4L,EL I 4 parcel' of land lying to ':„,ote 26 27. 2p A C� , �ivai aaytoa Co sty,; ar�egan, ba ,a� o i' i and as'f�1.�owa: re,parti�alaly ''ascrit,F��, fcginniasg at the Northwest corner of said Lot 26; th th�� :� acct t�sst along orth Aims of said Lot 26 a distance of ,30 i ftot " to tha, , tirue point Of beginning/ th nce S,outrestorly, in a straight line : South line of said Lot 27 ,at' a point 75 fast Wsst Cv en m ti' e sasu,, ad , alongte h n, og said; a ',,20 'and 27) of . Ma e Southr3st ro tout sopsr deacs i401 f n d ee4t t o M j o State Of' Orc by and throu gh its 'State Co Coat igsiot4o racorded In lto 195, pact I2 5, tzccc►rda of Was.tija /toss County; thence 'test to the Southtotat s.oraer of said Lot 27 s hence; tOritinuing i0asxt alo ytaoxin of Lott 28 anc 29 to too t ar line of � SoJth.rest corfsor of �t�29; • a 2 t. �, pct lip of', staid , Lot � � 9 to �ha. �QrtbtKQ't ,.ornm�r. �t�ea��n� a tha WQ lots t Baca -test s ong tt a ort1 1lino of tot* 26, 270.28 .28 and 29, to the point of beginnjngi PItRCLL• hl A parcel of � and ., . land d 1 i . Lots 32, 0� �OCaa �►.� � ng in �E caazthington' County, d ro on, the said 3ar 3 : lo�liovsi! el bsi�nq desc*ribeal a s ' aann q at a►dt Oil rtes o ,: t .. 1 f s:�ic'� Lot; Vii, eta' boint- 75 feet West (when ensured -ado ` y ine) of the sotatt otitt, corrner of tihet �pr .at tar zaoR .�ort� 1 yy��nso �j jj� in doed to Clio Stitt* of Orojon by 'a- nti through �Lts ate►t � had igpvai --A- 571 Report lla. 'r � .. y �.�oo�►t..�.nf�e � $isaion, rotor od , Cou:� y, °'.,rcq rn thence sou rh line poi, acrid Lo corn r, otf that proper fax and tiarouj:x; its St pat n 54( yid [ ei31 a'Rec ;tha 'So w3a t co�raf r o r*e '�► , na iid► Lot', 32. to Fat ,along the :=or ,h.,,1 o3.i%t of b inhi=ig;. PARCEL III: Lots 30 and 31, i(OSEWCOO ACRC ft'CTS,'.1 z.XCL TIt!G tho following ,�:- , � : ray dua rib03, ,pare ' th:onc.e Sou ,Beginning at ,he NO: t 4w at, coknor of ssid along t=oe Wes�"� .iin* cart said i cots' 30 and 3b, t the ',Southwest, rgor of aa,i d Lot 31. r� ' � t thens~a� Eat alo�q the ,b;au��a line .of ::nx�l Lst 31 a dia.tance of la0 ,feat; t nc a tiort �wu3t':�r'r1y' n a �strt inht lino to tnc Sou :h 'lLi a cbf .s id ,A.:,- ot `37 at .h a:�l i,ra't` •40' fcct '(w�.o: •:�aSIa e a along •uaid ,. outh tin 'of .ot 30) East f the Sou wc:41M" corm �,'r of gai.i Lt 30; tht:nce :iOxt.hwcater1y� in 'a utra &g::'t- Ithe tin tie pioinit of beginci ►g. '?. rlr��1.r iwr�ryiuq+.rrr �. � cs��w +�+eswre. rr�ii'w Via► iwr e..sr aww ww ,= , +ie, - STATE OF OREGON County of Vliathinpton �, Rogir tiinressen, D rector of F'tsf:orai and. Elect nns .and Off,eto' f�Y�cord.r of Con' vs` ance+s for said cointy, do; hei •by tisrtify thin the , .within yiiiitriittisin, of Mini Ong wrs rLce,vwd . ' end ' book ,, of r.cored,i ' !� ►�'d and ' jai •flixed. H JEER, THOMSSENtr ;Directors; o'acorth fai Elections' ont nuot on Sheet eport .04 _ - _OVAL- - - wikaittitryt RIO 1131101111111 L-17m. N1111 1111:1 1111111112 HUI SIM 1111 ofi SON IHRADSU Y CT. P11111 4..c7 /1 / 1 /1/1 / I I , , / / I.-, I. - L-- —t7 r IW. 'OGRESS‘ QN ;M 'EED ` VAR:IATI: �.i***** a* 0iF;*** 001P #i*ii00M*#***'le:* *I6lF41' 4P* * ,re46* * * * * * * * * * *-01 * ****P*4 * * * * * #} 1 a *** EM A PHASE HASE` yy xx1T yif , " 1 y IS,✓� fq DI STANCE ® TO SPEED D I STAMC 0. FT G MPS A SIDE QUEUE CLEARANCE, B' SIDE. QUEUE CLEr RAN 0 SECS ► SECS ARTERIAL PERMSS ISLE PHASE .SEQUENCE. LGG'ING GREEN WITH OVERLAP' CROSS ST PE ASE SEQUENCE IS THROUGH MOVEMENTS FIRST W'I'TH : AUEQO ' , MOVEMENTS (NEMA ) SAT FLOW RATE (VPHG) 0 1782 337? i' 0.1 0 IS MINIMUM GREEN (SEC) • , • TERIAL PERMISSIBLE PHASE SEQUENCE „ N A6GING GREEN` WITH 'IOVERLAR OSS. ST PHASE SEQUENCE IS' LAGGING GREEr� 1 • 11 n.. '. •.. a .': .. VOLUMES (VPH 0 582 52.1. 673 SAT. FLOW RATE; (VPHG) @ 3671 3279, 3 5? MINIMUM GREEN (SEC) 22 22 A S'I DE - QUEUE' CLEARANC C'`SECS :r ENC ARTERIAL PERMISSIBLE PHASE SE Q U , ,, LEFT TURNS 'FIRST THROUGH NC)VEMENTS FIRST' LEADING GREEN LAGGING GREEN CR05S 5r. PHA5E SEQUENCE S LEAL ING..'GREEN,i I DE" . QUEUE, ,CLEARANCI WITH OVERLAP WITH OUERLAP' WITH OVERLAP WITH OVERLAP" VOLUMES (VPH) ' 282 SA"' FLOW RATE (VPHG) .811 ,3564 MINIMUM GREEN (SEC i> 16 3 `-`,1 NCY. 1.00 ATTAINABIL:I' .A,VERAGE.' P►RQGRTLSSI)N SPEED. - SAND A : yG MPH BAND . * F ** * * *w * * * ** s +raw# # ** fl#* M, * *4 *P *** *** * * * *4 ** * ** * ** ** *a4** INTERSECTION' .1` 72ND OFFSET .0 SECONDS, .0 % ARTERIAL PHASE SEQUENCE IS LA66ING GR; CROSS STREET PHASE SEQUENCE IS THROUGH POVEMENTS'FIRST MOVEMENTS 1 +6 2 +6 4 +5 TOTAL 4+8 3i'8 GREEN TIME (SECS) 36.1 17.0 .0 53.1 i. 9 GREEN "TTME (%) 50.1 23.6 0 73:7 ZE' MEASURES OP EFFECTIVENES' V/C -•'- DELAY PROB. MIN MOVEMENT RATIO TOTAL AVERAGE OF QUE(,PE STOPS DELAY ( %) (LOS) ( VEH -HR ` (SECi OEH)(LOS ) ` : CLEAR . %) (',UEH /HR) ( %) CYCLE L. -.I✓rY �.w {L.\r ".r.: G......r r.+r- war -r. 'w�: .r..wrwrw+✓' r r`srrs�r�.rw.i�rw�l r w.w —� - -.. i.+wwrl. uiw'- , ,.. _ ,. ,.. NB THRU 68 (B) '1,17 31.0 (C) 86 1 . ( 84 )' SB THRU 20 (A) . 51 23.7 (C) 100 59. '( ?6 ) E8 T H RU : 52 (A) 1.41 28 3 C) ' 6 149, ( 13:5) WB ;rHRU t 12 (fi) .25 6.1 (A) 100 X72. 48 LEFT 39 (f) _.18 13.5 (B) 1'00 ' NoDE 1 68 (MAX 6.5 9.0 �.L ...�w,r4r.r ' � - � ..:. —.� ..r:r �.�. ... � '�Ji..Si..�d.1�i Lid. ►�.- .....4+.i.�rr t3 '�' ; SOL'UTION CONTINUED '` " tj; ��+ ' NEMPi PHASE aESIGNr1 "' "'.i 1F At R 1r t` �'i ,F 4F IF N a! i1 j11j * !/ *'t •° `t! 41* 4t11.11* INTERSECflON WE' ,I t rf OFFSET :I.6.'9 SECONQS, ARTERIAL PHASE SEQUENCI. I S CROSS STREET PHASE SEQUEN 1RTER I AL CROSS : 6'TREE MOVEMENTS I +F 2 +6 +5 TOTAL` CiREEN ,"TIME ( SECS } 22.0 .0 44.0 , '2 GREEN TIME (` %) 30".,6 30.6' . 0 1. I 3 I , MEPURES OF EFFECT/ EN V/C w._ IQELRY .: PROB.. 'MOVEMENT RATIO TOTAL AVERAGE , OF QUEUE STOP . 'DELAY ('I.) ( LOS) (VEH -HR) ( SEC /VEK) ( LOS) CLEAR . (% ). (VEHHf l +R )'t.X)' CYCLE w wr�_r:�wll�rlrruw_rw rrrw�r♦ it �ewrri's keu__o. wr�rrhi wirwr' L"i.pYw wr`. �+ir wii _�. r'ri:w.�r r.e r.i,i B 'THRU` 34 ( A ) LEFT 63 4 B > 3.63 1.6 EB THRU. : 76 (C )1 4.1 22.3 WB THRU 29 (A) .39 2.4 LEFT 64 (B) � 3.70 NODE 76 (MAX )" .�iw.rer Yrewwru �: _.irs�ii ii�,iw iw w�s_T%7 �.wr�r'�r _.tiww'I .�_r rr _'_nr r. ri��_�w:.wa�.wr r'Li tiiwri K;1'rll �iJr. irr��w_a _i%_n:i.r �br -� 49 CQNDS,)9 STREET, „., OVEMEN'TS,,:; , GREEN,, TIME (SECS) REEN, TIME ( 2+5 '.2+6 26. 29.0 ' 36.1 1+6' TOTAL ' 4 0 , ti4 '``18 tIrs 0 25, 0 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENES k)/(3 DELAY . ' PROB MOVEMENT RATIO TOTAL , AVERAGE OF QUL.U2 STOF/, S DELAY ( % ) ( LOS ) ( VEH-HR ) (,SEC iV EH )( LOS ) CLEAR (% ) ( VEHiHR )(% ) CYCLE " NB 'THRU 40 ( A ) . 92 , 26 0 ( C )1' , 1 102 ( 80 ) LFT t 39 ( A ) .87 29.8. ( C) 100 97. ( , 80, ), , EB THRU ou LEF1 11 (C) 2.87, 28.2 (c),, , 297. ( 81') - WB TRt.) 85 (E) 2.96 10.6 (5 ) 74 196. i9) NODE 3 t- .85 MAX, ) 9.81 13.4' GREEN TIME SECS) u1 �.f�.N TIME (%) � ! 4. •. _ .. __ :.__.. ��.,�'.:_:......;,.. ME :ASUR'�5 bF EFFECTIVENESS h ...„_ -. ,-•_ ,.._..: MOVEMET t RAT� O TOT.RL %) (LS � / (VEH -HR ( SELCAY I UE�R# ,G E 0.— S )' DEA OC F EP R .' (r QUEE' f 'ti "VE6S� /HRt % TOP5•i�.w r.t.'..W.w .rVr Lr�re r.elr rrr «�Irwu...w r rr r ■u.■•..m ■�x r,r rr1.00 .. �::i.`.• iii ∎irr N8 .TH`RU S1 (E) I.E.20 4'7.9 • (0)r ,'3? 3 ? 89 `+.oa.:�.q . .rl..ii0.rr.Y.••iemwr LY Lr�l.e ir{i� .riri'. FORMA 8ANO 328' EFFICIENCY 1 I @P ATTAIN�ABIL'I" PERFORMANCE TOTAL TOTAL AVERAGE TOTAL M5ASURES ' VEHICLES DELAY ;QELA'Y`' STOPS CONSUMPTIO{ CYCL VEH/HR (;VEN�:HRr) ,.(.SEC /VEH') �; EH /HR'? X )'' (GAL HR) (SEC O�ywr MwY�wIM I +r wwAlM r�lrii , �r�tYi w,w w wrw rl w. wri�'e��4�bO)w�Y'I Ai r�r�ie1 ww T,I CE p� AGRAM FOR; . �f I C ARO D:I STR f CT 1 RUNh iNJMI ER': 2' '03 / 13! 90 ; . CYCLE' LEMGT1 i M I J V 11 d ✓1 .. BAND H6," BAND , 5 MPH e8 MPN SEtONDS 23 SECQNOS BOTH LEFTS (1 +Sk ) BOTH THRUS c; 2 +6 ADING GREEN (2 +E GGING GREEN r (';1 E ti SIDE QUEUEwCLEARjANCE .il 8 tSIDE 'QUEUE ;'C' @' SECS (. nw', �„ M; �, °Q, SEC RTERIAL PERMISSIBLE PHRASE .SEQUENCE LAGGING GREEN'' S ST PHASE EEQUENC1:E4 G LAGGING GREEN' OVEMEiT VOLUMES (VPH) 0 813 349 {, r , 1 SAT FLOW RATE t UPMG) 0 " 3671 327 ' 6 MINIMUM GREEN l SEC ) 4�t Z� X22 It1TNIMUM GREEN (SEC 26 2 0 A"t.SIDE4 QUEUE .CLEARANCE' 8`: SIDE QUEUE` CLEARAN S' CS $ SECS RTERIAL PERMIS'�IBLE PHASE SEQU�NGE. • LEFT TUR 19 FIRST • r P WITH ,OVERL�IP'' THROUGH MOVEMENTS FIRST r W TH OVERLA' LEAD 3G GREEf WITH =OVERLAP '' LAGGING GREE�i WITH OVEiRLAP,:' <i CROSS, ST PHASE SEQUENCE a I' VOLUMES (VPH ), , 148 33, 49 963 � 4 1811 X 54 G 1860 ;. 0 181, SAT FLOW RATE (VPHG � 1811 � 3S6 , .: tlINIMUI1 GREEN ( SEC ) 1 " 'CLE , LENG "i'LM 72 SECS BAND A, . 1 ;SECS E3AND, .31 EFFIC-IENC' 1 00 ',ATTAINABILIT`f A � 1� I � Q VERAGE PROGRESSION SPEED 1 EAND A v 7 MPld :BOND B 27, MPH * * * * ** *,� *4* ** * **44a- * *! * ** ** * ** *M�s�►�F *4*44 *4 *4* k�4 ** 4.04 r� ,* *4 1.4,4* ► * * *A* *fit ** INTERSECTION OFFSET' .0 SECONDS m x ARTERIAL PHASE SEQUENCE IS LAGGING 'GREEN CROSS STREET PHASE SEQUENCE IS THROUGH MOVEMENTS FIRST ARTERY imL C OS5. * i'REET 1 +6 . +6 2 +5 TOTAL 4 +€I 3 +8 ' 3 +7.; . ,TOTAL 3G .1 17.0 .0 53.1 16.9. 10.9 '50' 23.6 .0 73.7 `6.2 .0 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVEN% SS —'------- - --- ---- ---- -- MOVEMENTS GREEN TIME (SECS) GREEN TIME .(%) ' DELAY PROBE MIN MOVEMENT RATIO TOTAL AVERAGE OF QUEUE STOPS DELAY, (t> (LOS) (VEH—HR) (SEC /VEH)(LOS) CLEAR. (% 1 (VEH/'HR)(,7) CYCLE' �._ruww.�rr.uw �wii r«_.:irrrrr.n.wr "�aww ni.0 rwirm.rr�r�._.rr rrr.V��r�iir iwrnrr .: NB 2.22 31.3 (C) 65 , .216:',.( 85 ) 8 THRU � 6 S (p) SS THRU 16 (A) .39 23.4 (C) 100 45. ( 75) 1-, w EB THRU t 5F (A) 1.95 28.9 (C) 96 161. b '8 ) WB THRU 15 (A) 11 2. 3 (A) 100 33 . , at LEFT 34 (A) 1.69 13.!!.2 (B) 100 306.'' ( 60 ) MUM iliEj J NODE 1 69 (MAX) 5.19 16:5 7&1. ( 63 ) MOVEMENTS GREEN TIME t SECS 3 0 <. GREEN' TIME ( .� ) .6 6'1:.1 38 . - - -- MEASURES.O EFFECT VENE s V/C DELAY': MOVEMENT Rf� +TZD TOTAL ,AVERA GE GE DF QUEUE , ( 7 ) (LOS) (VEH HR) SrC /VEL) C,OS )' CLEAR, l • 9B THRUM : 40 (A) 1.1E :, I G. 8 LEFT 43 (A) 4.19 l'.9.0 1' �) 100 294. t 71 ) EB ' THRU 3.37 19.7 (Cr 5 366 e ! C 59 fl WB THRU 40 (A) 1.39 6'.2 (A) 1+ 0 282. f ' BS ) LEFT 43 (A) 2.23 23.0 (G) 100 266. f' 76) 3. f 56. 40 1 F 10.3. , 69 (MAX A rP,.,........ i.M ...r''� «,'rw,!vu- .u- ...,�r --,•• maw•,+ e. i:4r. nr "6,:i.dr - 0- ..,�.... -- -, ...r+J. F.n,r rrN,;. —r oi.w11L..u., ..... ;ti- rrrrr,... rlrr;; AND: .31' EFFICIENCY AST XT. AVERAGE PRO RESSIDN SPEED II BAND R 27 MPH BAND �i�srrri�i rssr .r,- ..w1. +arsr�rwr er w�rraas 'wa rr.� fi+aN �rrrril wwrw�wmwr .�w.wsi,G.ir wirF�ir r'v r.srrrrrrf5i r. t is PERFORMANCE, TOTAL TOTAL 09(41,AGE TOTAL`' F!�EL MRS MI�i 'ME0SUtES UE,MICLES DELAY DELAY' STOPS CONSUMPTION. CYCLE:' (I EH /NR) t VE -HR) t SEC%VEH'.,j (VEH /HR,)( :('.SEC) LY'I. r r or.ars sr s ri%ai TOTAL : 8710.1 7.3 -` 19. 5248.9( ..,q �. rYn a•.wr:�ri��r.�l�e r. ■•■■■■■1 r pi, * EAST I/C * 46 . SS EIS • 72ND 4i' S Al• BANE) 27 MPH SEC(3NOS *4i* BOTH LEFTS (1+5 •=z,== BOTH THRti8 (2+6) "44* #**4 f1 011 #i# *;Vit'iF*tIE4M1f40**iF P1# *'F4eif *i *t****** 4 *** .INTERSECTION DISTANCE' 1 `:TA 0 . 5REI R SIDE QUEUE CLEARANCE' 0 SECS ARTERIAL ''P..r, RMISSI8LE PHASE SEQUEN LAGGING GREEN CROSS ST PHASE SEQUENCE THROUGH' MOVEMENTS FIRST WITH OVERLc MOVEMENTS (NEMA' VOLUMES (VP4 SAT `L QW: RATE (VPHG) 17,E 515 209 1792 3377 113 .@ � 8 :;� ,. i a A {SIDE �,UEUE CLEARANCE 9 , SrI DE, QIJE(JE . LEARAN . SECS a.,: " 0 5E,CS, R�TERI�AL 'PERM,ISSi6LE PFii'NSE SEQUENCE,, LEADING GREEN ''} WITH OVER:LR� %`' RROSS ST.:PHASE..SEQUENCE IS .LEADING GREEN WITH Ot EFL 1DLIUIES VPH) ". y 265 890 16 93 356;4�` EAl` FLOW RATE ' (t;;"HG ) MIN IMUM Gfa1EEN 'SEC EFFIC I 1`%10Y,.',, ER6E PROGRESSION SPE *4 ** 4 44 404'4:4:o* 4 4.4 * ii44,;c:***-4.*** ‘4,,* 4 4 4*4 * ***is )...4.*********.i* 44** *4',4 INTERSECTION I 72N0 . FFSET* ; SECONDS, * • ° ARTERIAL PHASE SEQUENCE I /S ,LAGGING GREEN , ' ' ' • , „' OS STREET PHASE SEQUENCE IS THROUGH MOVEMENTS FIR4'T 1+ AR124.6ERI‘ 2'4.5 44'SCR'°SJS RE 6 : MOVEMENTS GREEN TIME ( SECS ) GREEN TXME (14 36.1 17.0 ' ' .0 ' t 53. 1 18.9 0 .0 18.9 50. 1 . 23.6, .0 73.7 262 0 26.2 0 „ i — MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS, -----'-----t---'--'--- ow wk. Jilw ow' MOVEMENT NB THRU S8 THRU ViC --- DELAY PRCB. RATIO TOTAL AVERAGE OF QUEUE * STOPS DELAY ( % ) ( LOS ) ( VEH—HR ) (SEC/VaH ( LOS ) CLEAlq . ( VEH/i4R )( % ) CYCLE '1 • „ 77 (02 2180 ' '" 36.5 (0) 72 , 16 • ( A ) 40 23 (0) "t ;4' 10 I ( 75) ••E8 THRU 61 . ( 8 ) 11' . • • 1 • tt.n, Irrr r:rr'r W8 THRU 00 31. )", LEFT 34, , ( A ) '• 1.89 13.2 cB jg� • 306. bO) • . • - ; ; , • , NODE t , ( ) •;-, I ' „ E SEQUE REET. PHASE ,SEQUE14 ARTERIAL', . ..■ , . : " ',,-,,,,;, '.\,'',' i , VEPIENTS ' 2+5 2+6 ,, '1+13' T'CTAL ,,'''' , , ' ','-,,'"I :', 6REN TIME- ( SECS ) 1'. , 28.0,-'„' c:0, ', E40 , "18; GREEN, TIME ( % ) 36.1 , ' ' 9'1' -1, '','' . .01 , 75.0 ,''' ' 29;' MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS U/C , . ,, •,''' DELAY '1,,''''''' . '''' ''' ';' , . " , ",,,, ,...., i''' '''''' '( 0 , RATIO . 1,', ,' TOTAL''•,,,'-,, ,,,, ft• RA-Oe. ' ." • ', ''-, OF 701)EUE;, ' ( % ),', (LOS) '.' .(Vti,iti,1141',(skol‘iEH)..(tC)t:),,:•.,,,,I..gLgiiti.•...(%)':,'(Oti.11.1411)( - ' - . - ' -.1:::L...„,..._;...:L.,....,...;....„:.....:..,.....•..;:L...,,,:..:..,..:,,,,4,:„.-,...„,::.....0.4::..,,,,,,,„.,,,,,-.,..„...-::,,,.........,,......,....,:::.,,,,,..,..,,,:,...tt...,,,,..., THRU - 53 . ( A') '., • 1.28 27 a 7'', ' (C L,, ,.,:'""':,, ..', L4,37::,,,'''.;' ,,' ',,L";13 r ?, ' 6 ., .r,, LEFT ,;,,, , •964,' • ((E) , ,', ',,, '. ; 5,',,97'' , .86,4 ,',',,. ; (E) ;,,,,,,T, 6 „,.....-,??4,•(91) ;,;,,,;,,,,,,,..,,, i0 :E. ''' '' 403 '(tir)''''',''''','''','''''',:`'','• : I , ,, ■ ■ ' 1 HRU , 31, • ,() , 1 'r ' ' ' ' 1.36 L: ' 6' • '' '' '''' '(' A ) '' . ' ' 0' .• LEFT , : ' Si '(, A) ' ',• 1 58 , 1 .,/'' 21: ./ ' ( 9) .:''",:,':."''' 199',' :,,,,,,,.,, 414,, ( ' I, .1.i.') ,1:':: i4 0 : T H 0 u r , : 77, ,(0),, r : ,, 1.27 , ,,, :,,1,,,,, ., ,,,,,, ,,,,, ,„,,,,,,,, , .,,I, ',',,,, .; .,,,,,L,,,. • ., ,,,,,,,,,,•,_'",•••,.,; ,..,,,i”, ,, ,`',,,, 1 ,j::: ' ',': '',:i.:'''',',. : :,,', 'I, : ,,,r, :::,:',' ,,,r:','', i!:::', ::', ' ''''': ''';',''''' '/ , ':'''''' ' * ''' 9 4 ' ' ' 1( )''', ' r ', ' :: ' ' r :'*', '; ', 92 bt' ( if )'''''' , , , , , , i , , ' ' , : : , , :;',, ', , ' ' ' ' , , , ■ ' ' ■'r ', : , ''r ‘;' ' ', ',, ,' ., 1: * , 1,':, ' ' ' , ,'::',. ':',. ,', : ', , '' ', :' : ,,, '1' ' ' '''''''''''': , ,'',::, : '''''''''':':'''1;:, .:::';:1,'::, ' :;:,,',:::,',:!':7' ''',4:''' i',:,, ' : , , NODE 3 : ' ''9641''''4X ) ' 11.07 '1, 16 .5 ' . ' ,' - •,-, , '''1,, .' ' ,. 11074, (--,46 . ) ,,,sedomo sraiaeaes f +. Et ST I /C1; f .95 65.1 WES`t" I/C 16.3S 2 . G''1. 4 i�li�4rii rN'1 i�ir4riG Zs Me1C291sesra.ei * 3OTH LEFTS ,BOTH US CREME ***;**°* *i * ** * * * *, * * *ti * *' * * ***, * ****ax * 4i* *ii*4 * *4 $ I'OE QUEUE GLEARAWCE 9 S IDE QUEUE CLEARANI 0 :SECS 0 SECS' ARTERIAL PERMISSIBLE PHASE ,SEQUENCE. LAGGING GREEN 1111 11 CROSS ST PHASE SEQUENCE ;19 THROIJGH MOVE. BENTS; FIRST WITH OVERLAP MOVEMENTS (NEMA'') VOLUMES ( VPH ) SAT FLOW RATE (VPHG ), MINIMUM GREEN (SEG) 6 3C 17 A A SIDE QUEUE CLEARANCE ��.I SECS k14 rI iRTERIAL PERMISSIBLE PHASE SEQUENCEI D STANL SIDE QUEUE CLEORA ROSS ST PHA:aE SEQUENCE IS LEADING 'GREET VOLUMES (VPH )' 3Q5 ' 10''.1 0 : 929 1e Seia FLOW RATE (UPH ) 1693 3564 3871 1 MINIMUM GREEN ( SEC) .PERMISSIBLE PHASE 'SEQUE FT TURNS. FIRST THROUGH MOVEMENTS ; F!RRT I OING GREEN` AGGING, GREEN OSS : T '.PHASE,; SEQUENCE II' V S,,t Y KPHi 82 BEZ rvp O.UME� C I- r LW M SHIT FLOW RATE; (VPHG) 1811. 3584 MINIMUM GREENN ( SEC )' y**** 4* 1Ftl; I1.*** 11 1E*** it* * *'{iiF **- *** ** *** *iF**4**IFi� CROSS. STREET. PHASE, SfNQUIi NCE. I5 T'rROU6 4 MOVEMENTS F1RST TER z AL. :' CROSS ±1TREE' MOVEMENTS l+6 . 2 +6 2 +.5. GREEN TIME ( SECS) 36.1 17 . @" . ® 53 ..t GREEN TIME ('' /.) 60..1 23.6 �..��:br.r...r��..........:w. r.rrwr a a �1EASllRSS OF• EFFECTIVENESS ,.�.._:..�:,..w..r_..::�. I !.I ti I V/C DELAY -- fU tB MOVEMENT RiTIO TOTAL. AVERAGE Dr QUEUE. STOPS DEL (:) (LOG) (VEH -HR) (SEC /VEH) ( °LOS ..Y '(LEA1,R. (% ). '(VEH /HR i ( '.) CYC • ...w4...rLw.w.rlrw...... ... , ... _..,.. rrl w r..N......rr.l.....rs.�rww..r,hw wJrwr ...�� r.YY.iir rrwiti�..rwr i:r wKiwr�, �(�1 NB THRU 82 (D) .3.34 �3G.6' `;(,D ) $8 T.HRU 23 (A) i S0 23 8 (C ) EB THRU i,.5:4.....:• (.,4„.):...,...„ 1 + 43 28. r; ( ) WB THFrU 3^ (.0„,'„):L„„.. .26 LEFT = 3`9 (1) 2.1.8 13.5 ' (8) NODE (H ) 1 '32 AX 7.30 2 1.5 ." r.w w. TER I:AL.` PNPISE SEQUENCE I VEMENTS GREEN'. TIME ' °(SE091 22.0 22,; GREEN TIME (%) 30 . L { 30 . MEASURES OF. EFFECTIUENES;? V/C --- OE1.HY MOVEMENT RNT T O TOTAL RVERA6� ` +' ' OF QUE JE ; 4'TGPS: OEL;p'r_ _ rr.a.:r to or rr;�'r.ris>.r r.irrrrr�r.�.rf.�W:r Ynrib r,; SB THRU . 35 (A) .97 . ` 7i . 18.3 (, . LEFT : 63 (B) 63 21.5 (G) E8 THRU 4.7 WB THRU : (A ) .40 2.5 LEFT 64 (8) , 3,70', 25.6 (G� 2 80 (MAX) 13.4 10.6 I57' rr rrr�4r err 1 ,(. 1.,.. , �.ro •r w.rrr wrr�:wr rrrrrrr rwrrrrrr.illw il+`w',r rrrlIw �I�r; iN l��.ir.`.ryr .. •.. CR1.7FN TIME. ( SECS )! GREEN TIME (X) Ue /C MOVEMENT RAT x6 %) (Lou NB THRU` 40 (A I LEFT 40 (A) ES TNRU 3 (R) LEFT _ ?? ( 0 ) WB TNRU t 5 (E) i NODE 3' g5 (M ) /0 u �r rn w+ rwo.�wrr�.r .�m.:w i�r�( F .,. r wrwiwriiowYw wla��a� r�rurlw iV:/, rrw,u'y. rwwr'Yr rr.w �+r 'L++� ..p ws�s(tai 4+4 EAST I/C 9.65 9.65'63.,9% • • WEST I/C * 13.99 23.5 * „ BAND S ,MPH 1/ SECONDS 23 SECO Y 444 BOTH ECFTS (1 ±E + LEADING CIE tait* <BOTH GGINC 6 tE *4; NEMA PHASE EiES/GNA) IONS *if* A SIDE QUEUE CLEARANCE 0 ' SIDE QUEUE CLEARANCE 0, SECS 0 sets' ARTE7.1:1IAL. PERMISSIBLE PH(4ttC,,, :71EQUENCE. LAGGING GREEN WITH OVERLAP CRCSS ST PHASE SEQUENCE IS THROUGH MOVEMENTS FIRST ITh OVERLt'tP. MOVEMENTS 6 1 2 3 4 7 0()1.-UME,S (VPH) 0 170 490 207 0 76 0 278 4 SAT FLOW RATE (VPHG) 0 1782 8377 1912 0 18640 0 1782 MINIMUM GREEN (SEC) 19 0 19 d 4 *4 t*4.46**; fir* it** 9i ****# * :**441.1it'44"r* *^lF # �f r Ii TERSECTION 3 "' �,� EAST OISTANCC ';;2 TO 3 ; ,SPEED, ;� [ ISTANCE SIDE QUEUE CLEARANCE,, SIDE QUEUE CLEARANI 0 SEC'S' Qs SECS RTERIAL; PERMISSIBLE PHASE SEQUENCE: ..LEADING - ,GREEN R ©S5 ST' PHASE SEQUENCE IS LEADING GREEN" WITH QVERLr� °` ' (NEMA ). VOLUMES (UPH) &S1 AQ7 0 787 SAT FLOW RATE (VPHG) 169 3554 0',. 3G. 7,A 1621 ®.. b lei MINIMUM GREEN '(SEC) 26 2 O 54 18 D ** * * ** ** * ** * ** .** * * ** * * *a ARTERIAL.: PERMISSI®1 E PHASE ''SEQUENCI LEFT TURNS FIRST THROUarH 'MOVEMENTS L FIRST LEADING GREEN LAGGING GREEN PHASE SEQUENCE I . OVERLAP ' WITH OVERLAP ''W I TH OVERLAP f. W .T!r OVE tcAP VOLUMES (VPH) 140 > 1034 ! 9E3 SRT FLOW RATE (VPHG) 1811 35G4 1811 3564 MINIMUM GREEN '(SEC ) 12 G? 8S iNSPOR BEST SOLtl;T I' 7 BAND A SECS BANa B LEiVGTM� _ 7v 'SECS 31 EF,FI,CIENCY 1.00 ATTAINABIL,IT AV:RAGE PROGRESSION SPEED 1 - BAND, A * *,44 *4i. a,,4* 4441* 4‘'aa. *4*.a 4*4r ** 4146* *4t* a44 *iv* * * **0,4r *44.4** a * a u ** ***44 • INTERSECTION.. 72N° iFFET ,0 SECONDS, • ARTERIAL PHASE SEOUEtICE SEQUENCE IS THROUGH, MOVEMENT S FIRST MOVEMENTS GREEN TIME (S7CS ) GREEN TIME (%) V / ... DELAY MOVEMENT RATIO TOTAL AVERAGE ( %;) ( LOS ), (VEH —HR) ( SEC / kJEH) ( LOS ) /YYw_MI�M/N Wl{i4Ulanr yl_1�hAw11_WI�a__�MY� 75 _�Miwrw�.IM wYwW�w��Mlr PROBE MIN OF QUEUE STOPS DELAY CLEAR . { Y.) (VEH/HR) (/) CYCLE 239. ( 86 ) 57. ( 76) NB THRU t 75 (C) 2.66 34.4 1(0) B THRU = 20 (A ? .50 23:.7 (C) ' 100 EBB T Ir %0 6O (A) 1.71 29 8 (G) NODE 1 '75 (MAX ) .1i 22 (A) 1.78 13.1 (6) 6.75 • 4s.rr wi,w �':..1w r1..Yi ai.1 M.ii� 94 174. 100 30. ( 18 ) ' S 9 ) i 0 2C9 � �� 4, PA i c�EN.r p HI G IkA $ F L� IASE 'ARTERIAL PRA RE 'BEST SOLI,JTIO l: C�NT'INUEO bra* * * * *'* * ** .,• * * * *** * * * *+t ** +t{ ' INTERSECTION 2 WEST I FFSET 16.. ''SECONDS, 22,6 ('TER I HL PHASE 8t7qUENCE IS . LAGG I NC "ORE • CRO S STREET PHASEI SEQUENCE 15 LRGGI,4�1G 6REEN' ARTER1IAL ',, GROSS `.ST tEET I f MOVEMENTS I 2 . + 4+ TOT L GREEM T i ICE' ,(.S.EC.S) 22. ( 22.0 .0 44.0 28 ..0 .0 0 2 GREEN TIME (/) 0 6 30.6 0 51 ' 38 9, ,. F ■'• may: ims .. MEASURL S OF EFFECTIVENESS ...'- U/C DELAY: `"r PROB. MOVEMENT RATIO r TOTAL AVERAGE OF QUEUE . STOPS ( ) (LOS) (VEH —NR )` (SEC /VEH-1) (LOS) CLEAR . (%) (VEH /NR) (') w... OM u. ONO -'-- ..r a401 b...r.Lr- -4%4 rrs r w dw... r+.0i.w.i r...rw.n.r MO..d,.f. -- •;/%0 11111/1 - - - --- rL - -rb - wd. SB T F I U : 42 ( A ) 1.20 i 9.0 ( 8 ) 100 , 1 (. 7 . ) LEFT : 43 (' A) 2.19 19.0 (B) '100 ; rib 4. ( 71,) E6F�Rl� T ! 70 (C) 3.38 a,9: S (D) 9 364., ( 99 ) WB THRU : 41 (A) 1.46 S.3 (A) 100 294 ( 6a1) LEFT : 43 (A) 7.23 23.0 (C) 100 266•x' (ra ) NODE 2 70 (MAX) 10.48 .4 �,•.r .w ww in CROSS STREET PHASE SEQUENC 15 LEROI.NG GREEI ° • )(AS f.)EF'ARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS A D' PUB MULTIPHASE eifiTERIAL pROGRFssIoN`.' PASSER 11-84 SOLUTION CONTINUEb -*** NEMA PHASE OES I GNAT IONS :114t,',11.4***4t.'■***,41'',Ifilf,41.',*,4**4F*44.'14.**4t.*4.1•*51.41****.it*44.1!:•tfi4411..14.'t*i!%•:'441!*41''itifili$4i'44'4$P 41' 4t4e ' "(Y NTEEiS I r..,, • , .‘e ■ OFFSET= 81 8 SE6, k'4,OS 8t8 4 . AP,TER I , fSE SEQUENCE .1,S LAGGING GREEN . • CROSS SREET PHASE SEQUENCE IS LEADING GREEN • ARTttRIfL 'L ' !"!:OROSS,.',!..-STREET , movEriEl\ITs 1+6 2+6 GREEN TIME ( SEC$ ) (3.0 19.0 GREEN TIME (%) 11.1 26.4 2+5 TOTAL 12. 16.7', 54. 27.0 6 0 ' ° MEASURES OF EFf-ECTII4,11F,9S ViC DELAY POB. MOVEMENT Rf'IT IC , ,TOTAI. AVERAGE OF Qt/EUE STOP'S' DELAY , ( % ) ( LOS ) ( VEH—HR ) ( SEC, /VE11 )( LOS ) ( % ) ( VEH/HR )( ) " CYCLE ■••• ' • tops NB THRU 89 ( 5.56 38.5 (D 1 47 452 ( 87) E THRU t 23 ( A ) 12 34.8 0 ) 100 ,„ i ( '92) \\)- EB THRU I: 72 ( C ) 339 LEFT 74 ( C ) 1.74 !J1/41B THRU 91 ( E ) 9.81 LEFT 49 ( A ) 60DE 4 91 ( MAX ) 14.9 (8) 96 , 5142. ( 8 . ( 539 42.4 (0) 68 1 3 33,5 ( ) 53 1 900 ( 87) . 50 36.6 ( 0 ) 91 i 44 ( 90.) 21.52 28.4 2052. ( ) A ERAS DEP(iRimENT a1' ' HI HW.AY5 L PASSE 22 : MULTIPHASE ARTERIAL. PRO4 RESSION - 1451 PASSER `'.II -84' PASSER II-84 REST SOLUTION "U IF�AR' -� 7OT1 L , SYST 'M PERFORMANGE. *: LOWER BOONES OISTRI T CYCLE LENGTH 72, SECS BAND A BANC): .31 EFFICIENCY 1.00 ATTAINABILITY AVERtAGE PROGRESSION SPEED BAND` A "i7 MPH BAND 8 = 2? MPH .i.ur�..r.rrr..w m�owY srlrw rr s. w..r1w�..ee�.r. PERFORMANCE TOTAL, TOTAL; AVEitAGE S1EA *URES VEHICLES DELAY DELAY (VEH /Hli) (UEH -HR') (SEC /VEH ) TOTAL „FUEL MAX MIN STOPS CONUMPTION CYCLE t UEH /MR ,)'f'% )' ,(GAL /I-1R) "EC ) TOTAL 8784. 48.9 20 0 5313.1( 60) 82.. 86 INID 111.1• IMO Xfs D '.PARTMENT, OF ,HI�,�4 1iVS AND, R� LI.0 IRh14S I ULTa,,PHASE RRTERIPt PROGRESSION . -° 1451. 1 '' Pf SSER..X I £ 4 E ; SF''ACE, DIAGRAM ; F©R 1-OWE ° 89ONES„ TIGARD . DISTRICT 1 RUN NUMBER .2 G3/13/9D McEWAN + + ++ - ..— t.ii...40 + + + +' EAST 1/C 46.95 651 sRtds mitt tit ma iY h li BAND 27 MPH 27 SECONDS t Y= *4* B()TH LEFTS (1+ ++ LEAD/NS GRE EN BOTH THRU i 2 +8) - LAGGING GPE N (1+ RIZO 4TAL - '1 INCA. VERTICAL 1 INCH £CTE JER GOONES D I S t R IC GGRESSION: II OOE. EEC VA iIATI'i MINA J'B`' ;;OI .' SPLIT DIRECTIONAL ORIE I �T'ION S ECI (NARROW FORME T qri .Y , (f 1RTERIAL ORIENiTATIai t6AFROW l SCREEN) 'OUTPUT FO e iiAT. Ralf MEER OF INTERSECTIONS: * * * * * * * *** * * * * ** *:* *4* ** * *** **. * * *** * *' * ** *** * 4 *44, INTERSECTION *4 * *4 * 1* * ** * * **4* **4), ** * ** NEMA PHASE DESIGMA��:i IONS * ** 72N0 O I STANCE 0 TO 1, SPEED 0. FT 0 . MPH SIDE QUEUE CLEARANCE 0 SECS ARTERIAL., PERMISSIBLE PHASE SEQUEr'C LAGGING, GAEEN SIDE QUEUE ' CLEARANCE 0 SECS CROSS ST PHASE SEQUENCE IS THROUGH MOVEMENTS FIRST WITH :OVER .AW. VOLUMES (VPH) SAT FLOW RATE (VPH►; ) MINIMUM GREEN (SEG), MOVEMENTS (NEMA) 8 • L46 ,36 5,2E tee 1782 3 7?' 1891 36 3;5 OGR 'QUEUE :OLEAR;AN�E °a a SIDE; QU `UE C -I'• l SEC r.r w. ,�' fl.,..,, t i s x 1 �,_1' ri4� E;RIAL PERMII,SSI, sLZ PHASE SE► UEit',Z , LAGGING GREEN ,, WITH �VER.lP PH1 SE SEQUENCE 19,.LA6GING GREE UQLUME;$ .( VPH) 0 613 20 S lT FLOW RATE (UPHG ) 0 3671 3279 ,`', ;5:$.. MINIMUM GREEN (SEC) RES 4. * # ** *** *it *. * *•'* w4*,* **"IF`, S I OE ^•a QUEUE CLEARANCE d ` SIDE:' "QUE, 4', ' C:LEARAN. PERMISSIBLE PH(' SE SEQUENCE • r` "° LEADING GREEN IT OVERLA ,OSS ST PHASE SEQUENCE , "I!a 'LEADING GREEN a G ITH `OVERLAI MOVEMENTS 6 NEM11) VOLUMES (VPH) 406 1017 145 SAT FLOW RATE (VPHG) .' 1693^ 3564, 0, N 3671 1621 MIN'M1',:1 GREEN ( SEC) 26 21'73 VOLUMES VPH ST FLOW RATE ( VOI-16 ) 1811 . OGRE ANS MOVEMENTS GREEN TIME ( SECS ) 36.1 17.0 .0, 53.1 le,. 9 .0 .0 18 9 GREEN TIME ( ) 10.1 23 73.7 26.2 • 0 0 26.2 V/C,.' . ,DELAY I RATIO 'TOTAL, AVElkAGE. HOF QUEUE STOPS DELAY, ( ( LOS), ( (1EH'',HR ) ( 8E0 ) ( LOEt ) CLEAR i,:(%.") VEHiHF1,)( CYCLE' E8 THRU .t SS ( A ) W8 THRU 11 ( A ) LEFT t 35 ( A) < i E` r AL r H,S ASEQUENCE .` I S LAGG •r;1■•'.11,,1ir•■••"r V/0 O ELA1l MOVEMENT 'FATtO TOTAL AVERAGE ( 4'. ,(LOS ?. (V,EH�- -HR,) (��'SEC/VEH,,) (LO rf_r.r.r i0■_iri E8 T IRL,/ 81 (E) ) 4 . 9 E '4 .'7 (C ) W HRL T '.1 tH �@ ' 8 LEFT 3.70 25.E t„C NODE i, J C MAX 13.E 1 i 8' +1.ir ir.�i��r.rr�Wrrri.�iw wf.xr: +_wr.w ri.rrswr ui�iwri�. �:a. ':rlre� '!F iF: Fa* *!* il. AF iI 1F IF{ iF; : * CROSS S i'RET PHRSE SEQUENCE • LEADING GREE CROSS STREE' MOVEMENTS 2 +5 2 +6 1+6 TOTAL 3 +8 YS GREEN TIME (SECS) GREEN" TIME ( %;) MEA8(1RES OF EFFECTIVENES -- •V/O - DELAY .� 'ROB. MIN MOVEMENT RATIO .� TOTAL "AVERAGE 'O,F `QUEUE' STOR "5 DELAY ( ) (LOS (VEH -'HR.) (SEC /V' ')(LOS )" on. 00:0..w 0..00w... r0 s.a.�a:� s. ..:....000:0..0.0e��0..rr.Y+r N8 I Th.h#RU 40 (A) .92 26.0 C) 100 1Pz'. "(• °''8 LEFT 46 (A) 1..07 26." C ), 99 1 X71. E O E8 TNHRtJ 37 (A) 2.02 7 8 (B) 100 694. 84) .' LEFT 78 (C) 3.36 28.8 (C) 75 338. ( 83') WS T+ 1 U 86 (E) 3.10 11.0 (B) 73" 201. t r.0) NONE 3 1 88 (MAX) 10.47 14.3 1352. ( Si ) .000 r�r. wi0�wrn.0rrwe i.i +w Mi..i+dw ri'.. ,'. MOVEMENTS GREEN TIME, ( SECS ) GREEN 'TIME ( ) V` /t, -- MOVEMENT RATIO TO,TAE, AVERAGE. (%) LOS) (VEH —HR) ( SEC/MEW ( LOS ..rsr.e..rr....siioe ------ ..., -- - ..ryr urge+ ..p+'�r, NS THRU 91 (E) 3 8, THRU = 80 (D) 2.24 B THRU B@ (B) x.34 LEFT 93 (E) 4;.88 W,B'' THRU 91 (E )'' LEFT : 55 (A ) NODE 4 93 (MAX) 24.21 11111121 zbi�etiryk! 4ESit I/O 1'E 9S AO iii ..... : ■;,. ill are ill iei a u l 1 •' GAIVO yy Axn:OH.. • 2S ,tIPH 26 iPH i "7 SECONb , E O �� r BOTH LEFTS 1+ +++ = 9OTH THRUS (2 +5) `' Lr� SING 'G EEN C►R TNT! I*4 * * ***4** **C".4?**4***** "*4*** * *' ** *'* * **- * *0 * * * * * * * ** * * * ** *fit* * ** * *** * *,4* ** ** **41 NEtif): PHASE DES I GNATI ONS * ** INTERSECTION :1 72ND OISTANCE 0 TO 1 SPEED; DI.S7RNC 0. F"1,` 0,. M. PH SIDE QUEUE CLEARANCE , E �.. SIDE QUEUE GLEARANCE 0 SECS 0 :SECS = ARTERIAL PERMISSIBLE PHASE ' EQU NCE LAGGING GREEN WITH O.VERLfa° CROSS S " PHASE SEQUENCE 1:3 THROUGH MOVEMENTS FIRST WITih OVEr UEMENTS ('. NEMA VOLUMES (VPH) 0 171 4 9� 208' 0 ; SAT FLOW RATE t VPHG) 0 1782 3377. 1894 0 184 MINIMUM GREEN ( EC) 0 38 "a6 17 Pi 1. PERM SSI LE` PHASE SEQUENC GIGGING GREEN PHASE SEA UENQE IS LAGGING °`GEEN VOLUMES (VPH P33 9 6ZS z SAT FLOW RATE (VPHG) 0 36?1 :.3279, . ` 3564 G 16 MINI MUM GREEN ` ( SEC) G" 44 22 0 RTM ,SIDE QUEUE OLEARANC E , j q`SE'5 F " PERMISSIB LE PMA,t E SEQUENC LEADI,NG GREEN, ? WITH ;OVERLAI ROSS 'ST .PHASE SEQUENCE I.S` . LEADING GREEN VOLUMES (UPH): 260 F WJ:: , f�.'' ?.90 29S �: 3" 36 ?'�i e 0. �a64 SAT FLOW RATE '( UPHG ) 1 . _.. �� 1621 MINIMUM GREEN (5EC) y.0,1 IlME .,...103E SAT FLO f . RATE (Vt HG) 1811 '3S64 1811. 3S 4 @ 18.6,i MINIMUM GREEN (�':t0) AVERAGE PRCIGRES3 AND, * ** * * *16 * *ir ** . *41* * *** * ** * * * * ** ************** ,+ * * * * * * *4 * ** ** * **# ** * * ** fiR PSSET� ..0 SECONDS, ARTERI,P,L PHASE .SEQUENCE. 15 ""LAG,GING GREEN . , C,ROSS,STREE► PHASE SEQUENCT IS 1 ROU►H "MOVEMENTS FIRS CROPS ,STREET MOVEMENTS: 1 +6 2+6 2 +5 TOTAL 4 +8 GREEN TIME (SECS)' ;:�fi. 17.0" :0 53.1. GREEN TIME (%) 50.1 23.6 .0 73.7 ' 2E .2 MEAs'JRES C!F EFFECTIVENESS U/C DELAY'' + »• -- PROB. MI,N MOVEMENT RATIO TOTAL AVERAGE : OF QUEUE STOPS DELR (%) (LOS) (VEH -HR) (SEC VEH) (LOS) CLEAR .. (%) (VEH/HR) (% ) CYCL r rrrr��wrrr rr�ti.��r ar1�'+r1.. r�cirr r- r.�r�+i�rrr �wwr r.d r�Yrr'vr.rrYrrwri�rL"��.�e.�I:. �.�r�.rr��r r:.i r1i..J:rG.. NB THRU 76 (C 2.7S 3S.1 (0) 73 244. ( 8S) SB THRU 3 20 ( ) : 49 23.6 (C) 1't' 0, 57. ( 76 ) 2:2 (A)` 10' 13.1 f8) LP NOOE (rIAX 20.1, .r�+iM�.arrirr�Lwr lr r.r'r+..wr.. w+.r aY'�r +I ioil��rLr rwi wi..i:.�r +.C.d Y1.. i.L.w �..r1.�r..11r rlw r.. T' PSOLU;TIAN CONTINUED�4 +� NEM ,PHASE DESIGNf T SONS 1 s � �� 11 � � � �1 � � t `' �•.. tl �r a�s t� lye � I. r 'w�4� *0 *r, L r **1. ,4°*** * ***'* * *9* ** ******1'* ** *4 l*Q* *! b .W ERSECTION SECONDS, S5,1 ' RR�TERI PHASE" EQ,� �� , �LE AQINC.6RE E N ARTERIAL MOVEMENTS +5 2+6 1 .�SEEEN c SECS � 26..0 `26.0 GREEN TIME ( %) 36.1' 36 .,9 TOTAL Vi'C k:� DELAY MOVEMENT RATIO TOTAL AVERAGE ('Y) (LOS) (VEH -HR) ( SEC /VEH ) (LO: ) N6 THRU 53 ( A ) 1.28 'LEFT 94. (E) 4.9? 60 ? (E ) EG THRU 31 ('A 9 1.3? LEFT Se/ (►') 1.54 l.46 B THRU 75 (0 1.25 5.1 (A) NODE 3 54 (MAX) 10.4 10g? . �sr.dw:�rLrrr.�w�{�aw.rr,L`r.ir L �wr'�rM:i'icrr riwrirrw'��rrw:iK.rlr w+o lrMr..i V!c OVEMENT RATIO (, %) (LOS) N8 THRU • S9 (E) SO THRU EB THRU LEFT 74 ti ) MEASURES FEOT Y UENE i' L (WERA.6E OF ';O. EU LEAR:. r.�i M.Vi+r W.rt LI�Y� 4r�'ir}rr.rr / i4!r.i�VA.+r WO THRU 91. ( E) 9 , 6` "a3. ? (0 ) LEFT NODE 4 '31 ( MAX ) r -�rr.i r r�.:f.ir bL ir:. . fr �i��wrrriwt.irviL rn`rr.lii PASSER Iii , 84 � ` T, SOLUTION SUMMA RFORMRNCE TOTAL TOTAL ° A ,ERA G, '' TOTA ASURES VEHICLES 'DELAY DEL STOPS VEH /HR) VEH =HR ) "• (S ZCIVEt) (VEH /HR )( .. '.�.___.�c�.. �.��rr�i •i�rrruw 4s .w W:r lw.rri� MI'.ir�r i,`w r ..w+irriwr r�i'w._ wrLw�n��CISLRSCC. -: BHNC 27 , MPH 7ECCwOS IsEY : * ** BOT LEFTS t +S i; +4 + LEtWI "NG "GREEN yy BOTH "iHRUS' t w +B ): �=� LtGGING GREEN' , +'i PROGRESSION h�00E . ya SPEEQ `VARTATI;IJN: MIN. "B'” OIR. `SPLIT. O:IRECTIO RL ORI� ENTATION SPECIIE ©' "rr t� (ARROW FORMAT QN F LY , ARTER.I'AL Q.RIENTRTION Rf- IflRECTIC NARROW (S'CREEN } OUTPUT FORMAT'' i" * * * if * *' *4 * 4 * *t o *******444.4` * * * * *t * * ** * b* ** * ** 411 i! *** * * *1* ** *'M * * *** * * „f* INTERSECTION OIST"ANCE 0 TO 1 ' 'SPEED 0. FT 0. MPH 11,OE QUEUE CLEARANCE' 0 SECS SIDE .QUEUE GLEARANCI 0 ,SECS ' I P ARTERIAL P�E MISSISLEI PHASE SEQUENCE . L.A6GING ,GREG "c WITH "OVERLAP j FIRS WITH OU�RLA P. ;. GR05S GT PHASE SED „JENCE IS THROUGH �90VEMEN'IS. FIR`. T VOLUMEt JF.H, 0 SAT 7 ,!.:OW RATE (UPHi) 0 MINIMUM GREEN (SEC) 0 139' S38 188', 0; 1E2 1782 3377 1892 0. 1904 ' 3G 3O 17 A'Rfl SSE 3ix�F1F ******fI** ****4*.4 *4x,4(M*1` ISTANCE ` TOe 3 SPEED DIST►.ANCE , 3 PEEG TO 2 520. F ' 25. ,MPH 5b0. FT E QUEUE CLEARANCE 0 SECS SIDE QUEUE CLEARANC SECS RTE FURL ,,,PERMISSIBLE PHASE SEQUENCE LEADING GREEN CROSS ST PHASE SEQUENCE -IS LtAOING GREPI WITH OVERLAP. MOVEMENTS (NEMA ) VOLUMES (:VPH ) 402 1016 0 '033 14? W 0 0 12? SAT FLOW RATE (VPHG) 1663 3564 0 X671 1621 0 ' 0 1621 26 :6 0 54 1° 01 0 Q t SEC ) 1 MINIMUM GREEN ARTERIAL PERMISSIBLE PHASE 'SEQUEtviCE. LEFT TURNS FIRST WITH OVERLAP THROUGH MOVEMENTS FIRST WITH OVEribP LEADING GREEN WITH LAGGING GREEN . WITH OV,ERL.A1';',',.' CROSS ST PHASE SEQUENCE IS LEADING 'GREEN',. ' WITH OVERL ■11 f.. EFFICIENCY 1.',.00 ATTAINABILITY' !ERAGE ,PROGRESSION :SPEED — ' BAND A ** * *4 * *mar OFFSET- .0 SECONDS, ` b % s °I ARTERIAL ` 1ASE SEQ r.40PE ' �L GG T NO GREEN i I C L cR9S..� 91,k EET :PHASE SE9U NCE TS THROUGH MO,UEM� NTS FIRST ' ARTERIAL CROSS 'iTRL�.ET • MOVEME S 1 +6 2 +6 2,175„. TOTAL, 4+8 3 8 + i TOTAL GREEfu' TIME C SECS) 36 a,1 .1 ?.0 y ; a3. i i8.. 9 GREEN TIME t%) 50.1 23.6 .0 73.7 26.2, .0 ..0` 26 2 - - - - -_-- MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS V,' DELAY PPCC MIf MOVEMENT RATIO TOTAL AVERAGE OF QUEE' STOPS ` dEr_f1Y. ( %) (LOS) (VEH -HR) (SEC / VVH) (LOS) CLEAR . (>) (VEH /HR) ( %) . ,CYCLE NB THRU . 92 (6) wirr..r (E) SB THRU 39 (A) 1 ,f,:15 25.1 (C) ;100 120. ( " 9) C9 THRU = F 6 (A) i'.812Y 28.7 (C) 97 :156... ( 83 WB THRU - 11 (A) 21 5,. s (A) 100 1 44 ) LEFT : 3' (A) 1, 99 13.3 (B) 100 323. ( 61D :s, �' 42 NODE ' 1 92 (M00() 9.94 26.4 966 .. 7 f .dwww..._..... —.:::r ....i:l.�:......:— —, ,i.:...11w ,,,.. J.rr.. .r—....—,:—.. ..—..,..-4„...,--......,..— r. lirr..i... �r �+:iiw... .i. f....,- —... ..-- ,,,,.lKi.. 055 ,STREET , PHA ADIN ARTERIAL 1�.pwwww rw.� ��ilAfa,•d ri .Y /C rwr DE:LA MOVEMENT' RATIO TOTAL AVERtIGE OF; QUEUE' S t ) ( GEC /VEH) ( LOS LEAR .;( } : . % .), . �(� } � LOS (VEH HR d i W 0' THRU, 4 ( A) 26.0. ( LEFT ; ? 47 .• (A) 1.09 26,:'8 ('C ES THRU a7 (A) 2.03 ' 7.8 LEFT `7,9 (U) 3.28 29.4'( C) y rG ) W6 THRU NODE 3 86 (MAX) ' "' 10.37 w.d wwwbnii.. r:, r. ww ..r�:+rr�r.r+.w�w..i.�:l.rwwrf err wr++rrlw .+r�wb `w 1.ir�.ww rr NB THRU 91 ( E;') SB THRU 9® (0) W9 THRU 9 (E ET : 59 (f) VOCE 4 93 (MA)() 4.36 34 413, wrbw �. wrrWruJ lle.ri��r tr�ii�wwwiror .::r.rrr`�.I��.i�rr�w rrY�r �ti:rr w+i.+ir.7w a'rw ��..wr ..Yr.W:�r�.'r1w� WLrS 6..i Y�ww W' WEST ifC 4#' --- ki [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]