The URL can be used to link to this page

CPA1990-00003POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. , , F I CITY OF TIGARD Washington Co`Antyo Ore jon Co � n4C ®8'»,i1l1g Cade ha`'..*rt lib ) : C�.?, '9gigi9N 1 � ®�Q! ®i1 • Name of Offer • Cumin h . Address 290 o $ire S 360 City* Es....6k4....qc-TAMa state , Zip likra 4 Auireee of property: 12528 SW Schol s Per Tax map and Lot yito (- ) . s ISI 1 t . `1 lot 24.0. as Requ®et: A re eat APP_E-oval ghaE99 t .�A ee 49ACM 1 io*st row Ana' +crass tha �o�ainots i0ts ran assn ®r�►� ,�rCa, rho' cra�ac>e� �...®,..,.. -..- to 5 e action s Apps vai an r,:. stem APProval with r=t!t qfe.. nial Notice was Published in the >ae►aspaga posted at City gall, nailed to The applicant and o me : ( s s ers 'of record within the required distands The affected ted Neighborhood Planning Orgartiiilition Affected. ciovetnaental agonciees SIGH COMES �g� Ol4 y�j� EFFECTIVE . a The adopted findings df tact, � inione and statement Of fl can obtained from ' at Ti arcd City '1 a1 , , 1312S ' ,8al; the Planning �e�n m � � P.O. Box 397, Tigard. Oregon 9/223. cz ro A review of this c�acis�iancaa►y obtained a�aa3� with the Oregon Laud use Board d of ( proceduree5 A It You ha'e any esticns, ].ease' ie Retard t 639.4171. bkm /CPA90 -O3 8 NOPO -CC FINAtijestu) ct3k CritINING • RICHARD EL „ ATP, 4040' LAKE OSW7,90 RALPH WLLIGER 1600 SW CEDAR HILLS 81,411) ' POrtTLIkND I OR 97225 BOB LARS1i1"1, 12040 SW NORTH DAKOTA. TIGARD, Pi?, 97223 ria7,,INDA NELsEN 106O SW styli/Et 'LAKE TIGIM I OR 97223 LEE CUNNINGHAM 13385 $.,A 115TH AVE TIGAR.D OR 97223 FRED 7, IIEDNER 10500 SW TARPAN BEAVERTON , OR 97005 JOHN DZRGAN ATEP, . 4040 DOUGLAS WAY LAKE OSWEGO , OR 97035 BRITISH PETROLEUM OIL CO. C/o BRIAN DUFFY , BP OIL 3868 PROSPECT DR. 5-360 RANCHO CORDOVA , CA 95670-6020 STATE OF OREGON CO 7,ty of Washington Cit3 of Tignrd I b kkVt Q 6 {,, i ,..� being first duly rn/affirm,- on oat'' depo -e and say: (1;ieas prii*t) ,;l .�. ` That I J n a .x Y. 02 T. 4 ' for The City of Tigard,` 0reg®n. ✓That I served NGTICB OF PUBLIC BEARING FOR: „ That I served NOTICI OF DECISION FOR: . City of Tigard 1 Planning Director Plan r y� ® o Tigard E9P: ; Tigard Hearings Officer ✓ '�'igar l City Council A copy (Public Searing •_Nic w /Not1Lce of DeotisiOn) of which e attached (Marked ,Exhibit ' A") was mailed to each, named, per cans at the ad +s 3 shown on the ' of ter" 1 . `'_' 199 attached list exhibit °°�' ®�a the _ , day .�� on an a iat:. said notice. }NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto attached, was : bulletin hard on the �•,r„w day of '` , 19 and deposited in the United States Hall on the d-y cy,;� �,.° `C „F )i1"Dostage prepaid. Person who posted on Bulletin Bed (For Decision Only) 144 P , son who delivered to POST OFFICE • sub rift and sworn /affirm . to me on the . „T t t /tinI ltttt hknd FID `6s'. BKM MEETING 0Ia7• OIL PI L N0. Z 'PA 90-0003/EON 90 -0001 O: i PILE( TIC: C11nniaagh /DP Cni a APPLIC NT: DP Oil, Brian Duf f u: 286 Proe ct •Dr. ute 360 385 ST 115t, h Ave. Rancho Cordova, . '' 05.67 (1462® ,Tigard, QR, 9122. ' I IG � s-re . mA1eIV PLAN ANDME' CPI ,96-0003 ;ZONE GE ZON•.90 -0001 c INC Mrssp { NPO t7 A I regpe t for approval . af, a' ipre1r®citt • P? ,Atz*Idmeot, to ,change ,th , ,;Land ' uee Di -;natt goy► ` P'rafoltelOne41 . Con' rc ia1 to C -G General ``' 4 rcial *kid,' V. chan�^a. the - Toning desk nation from C-P to `C--G. LOCATION: 12528 $W 5ohol10 Peri y Road ,(W'CTM .1 '1 35 ,; t tit lot '2400) (see' P O Reveree Side) 1+;, t,• PUBLIC LNG ON xLL R$ •COND 1 C RULES OF C i+aTT�E� W'� DEVELOPMENT' .. �'�� xI� �iCC�R)iA�Nw:'i'I�IT NR 1R • 32` OP Tl Ti3i ADOP D BY Tim ,TIG CITY COUNCIL$ d AT� CITY- PROCEDURE T E I... N ,CHAPTER, 1603�A'' f®i d*l3i019Sy HAVING W s MATTER MAY ATTEND TESTIMONY, MAY Iii ENTER D IN' 'THE RECORD. D FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECO AT 639-4171 TIGARD CITE HALL, ; 13125 SW HALL ►'tip.' i sfro COMBINE s.w....t s BE er • CIF?, i • ANTON' DR, r iw wr �q r r.r ,w r< w �.ir rwl WisMl> iivlr'+r .�.. au �.,•QI 2S1330•00100' O•e•••• •0••b•b I;' ,DNER, FREDERICK A & ESTEER Z 106001 SW TAR/IAN DR. EAVEIVON" OR 97 05 1S133AD.- O20Q •.0 • • • • • • .... • • • • •• ••C • • tl 1KOU°ZO S, ,:gozeit 15962 SHORT ST, Y► LINDA 1S133Ar •00300 e••...a.`� FR 4N'"'ES 8 12610 SW THAN DR,. R.INRTOTd iS133AD•00400 n • • RAMIE, ESTIS. a,X 51507 RIYADH 1151)3 'SAW' ARABIA. � S133AD°- 00500. , .... • 0 4::. 04............. z YEN, BANG PEUOZ AND G KIM TRI 12670 SW TA AN DRIVE EATON OR 97005 S133AD- 10000`•••e•••w•4•0 ,w00000%00 tan AVAL NORNA L AND AVAL, NICOLAS, A AHD NrAVAL, [ NICO A JR ET AL 10705 SW 227TH TIGARD /► O:t 97223 S133AD ..102GD ................ • *op. 3EEHANN, SANDRA KAY 'iO673 SW 127TH CT a YG OR 923 S133AD- °0990O • e' WAGNER o ROOT G AND RR3CLY E 10717 SW 127TH • • •!db a 0.• • Y, O W.4� • 0133A' -10100 •, •e•o •ao•••Wi•aoa•, PETERS, CANDAGE ° 10687 SW 127TH IGARD OR 97223 S133AD •10300 • a • • • • f immoral WAYNi E N /:l$NT - A 10059 SW 127TH CT 'S133AD- 1.0400 ar,4•oe.iass.•ei.e•s.• EERNENS p LklittiErira ' 1 & CYNTHIA N 10647 SW 127V1 CT TIGARD OR 97223. 11S133AD -10600 • •••• • •.....•....••• 1' EIG$ORN STEVEN C ° 10635 SW 127Ta CT TIGA RD OR 97223 i S133AD°- 10600 . • 0 . Y b 1 :• O w b 0 O • b.• WRIGHT, DOUGLAS V AND TW ESA H 10623 SW 127TH CT IGARD OR 97223 1S133AD•40700 ••r•oo•••.0.to ••••a•ba SA,L+VATION ARMY, CORPORATE BOARD PO E;CX 8795 PORTLAND Ott 97208 S13?AD-10800 .siiswa∎• OCKWOOD, MICHAEL P AND b HON, MICHAEL D BARTHEL, C >iISTINE lei L. 610 SOUTHSHOIUS BLVD LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 1S133AD -11000 .•.•.woi••4 •••.•o•iW 1L' FFE LFINGER., ViTILIAH T 10662 SW 127TH CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S133AD -10900 • •• . a sa • o o e w-5 ti'• a • b eh.** RO8$I$IS 10 'r4 127TH REG D OR `97223 1S13116- 11100 46444•'e•44 a4 +QUA14:$r THANH & L 19824 Sig 68 181:43A0=11200 W ii W.e W W i a • •'o b::i 0I']LTi0, BRUCE it & ELEANOR S 10682 SW 127TH CT' IrlUt 1133AD- 11300 w a• . e a•. • Yb.4.,. 4.a d'• • rF +, aLIGA, 10690 127T` CO's RD X722; �g �+ yam: filr M11S1336Y6i��I41140�/� a• a POTTER, I(1. .F 10704 SW 12/1''x' H ,i ' TIGARD ' rl r r, 1S133=.11600 1D wo)• • eeooee Aes 00oesaore;, • MILLIGAN / AaN ToAsson, 4raNtyrA P 10724 SW 127TH.' CT TIGARD OR 9723 1S133 12300 eeaeae.eeeeoeeooe• COMPICGANe KEMP S a nastiffa C 11347 strarawom DRIVE TIGARD OR 97213 1Si134J C -00403 a e a Y e A A• O 0 e• REAL ESTATE EQUITIES JOINT VENTU SOS' ENTERPRISES MO 9777 taLSHIRE Val #710 3 S CA 90212,; �15ixx3��3pp� +a- 122120 ,r y ..NO XS 4ETTH Per' SOX ° 19524 RTL e4 'sr;4ae'e 00. ,1S133AD 02504 o. 4�, 4gWye�� ea e. a 01. o e a ��e a a v` �a .,,, KINDER'Y''�eaNARE, • r4th NX i ' �` u 14O6 .SIDS `;D 1OfO1P tS13483O°O0401 .0. M e• a o, a es• a e-- ; - -..a ..... S/SZIRS . OF PRI:WIDEN= IN OR sr S T1 X N gOSPITAL Ads ORM VAN PELT 9205 S NEs ' 9 P -1RTLAND OR 97225 7-513488- 00304:' oao'.,saeo'eeeeoasseeoa0e. I SCROD TERRA= TS PARTNERSHIP 838 SW FIRST STE 509 PORTLAND OR 97204 BRIM IXIFFY, BP , OIL 2868 PROSPECT DR. 5-360 R. S-3 RANCH RANCLTO CORDOVA, CA 95670-6020 LEtte, CUNNINGHAM 1,3385 SW llSTH Alig TI'IGARD, OR 97223 JOHN JlRGN A'ICD AT EP, INC. PO :BOX 1318 ► SALEM, OR 97309 AFFIDAVIT pP NAl ST T3 OrF OREG°N county of Washington'B s City of Tigard That I am The City a�.k Vigard, Oregon. That I served n NOTICE OF PUBLIC ING> .FOR: That I ser 'ed NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director e:- Tigard Planning Commission on Tigard Hearings officer _.:...� Tigard City Council A copy, (Public Hearin Nci ice i�`�xhibi . °°A ") was nailed to each named attached list marked exhibit "Br on the said not ice NOTICE or DECISION as beret bulletin board on the day of in the United states Mail on the Postage prepaid. rNot .ane of Decision) of which/1 is attached (Marker sons at t e addre ds shown on th ,� dsy -, of 9. .t_ 6ttached, was posted) on I appropriate , 19 ; and depot ted day of , 19 9 p`. --- -- Person who posted on BulletIn Board (For Decision Only) rsob who , delivet'ed to FIST OFFICE NOTICE ® ' . P UU B L I C N LE t'Fio,,...�R'I, N,. NOTICE I8 HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING 88;x.• .' AT ITS MEETING ON TUEsDAYg -102j6.11.-:1&-2122Q, AT /11Q PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC L�"9'8. ® �� ING . TIGARD THE PC�ffi'�1 C:i�NT8�1,, 1312 5 SW HALL � }'�RD, ` OREGON o APPLICT$0N a FILE NO.: CPA 90- 0003/20N 90-0001 NPO NO: 7 FILE TITL s' cunningham/DP APPLICANT; BP Oil OWNER; Lee Cunningh Brian Dr ffy 13385 SW 115th Ave. 2858: Prospect Dr., 8.360 Tigard, OR' 97223 Rancho Cordova CA 95070_6020 REQUEST: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AKENDHENT CPA 10 -0003 ZONE' CHANGE ZC 4 90-0001 " p of designation from Comprehensive Plan C�1NNiNCN�d /8P r�P�? #7 A request for approval ® a 9 Amendment to change th® land use Commercial a� d ta�� change Professional s��r�a�.�ng Commercial to C -G General . designation from C -P to C -G. LOCATION: 13528 SW choll® Ferry Road (wcTM a,Sa 35PaD, tax lot 2400) (See Map On ReverEae Aids) ` NDUCTED C E HITR T THE PU$LIC HEARING ON 'IRIS NATTER HILL S� o IN �ACC�I�DAN AN HALL, of PR URN' DE�lt#PY�NT CND RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 0 `CSR �tiL�� op .. . ADOPTED NY THE TIGARD C.� � PERSCal�iB . } T3C COUNCIL AND AiT3�IL►ABLE AT PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN �• .'SR 18.30. IN THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND DE , OR TE8 q� TZMONY MAY HE SUBMITTED I WRITING TO Bid p�� FAILURE TO RAISE TBR IN 'E' 003 Tom: ENTERED INTO THE RECORD ��' Tk�i HEARING. � FAILURE T�1 �$P3^.°�°Z�: {�. R, AND IL BYLETTER �j+��yg g� AN APPEAL, IN �. rSVL'�4sJdTJ�;iy�i iA►�. � CORMUdITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR r9:1C RE NBI PLAN AT WHICH 8s IF DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. FOR FURTHER I1 k ATION P E CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 63,9 .4171, TIGARD CIT HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., oR CONTACT YOUR NEICNBOR D $ NING' ORGANIZATION (NPO)_ # 7 anQg. Q lain I HONE ERn 5. 2,s6 C' bkm /CPA90 -O3. CONES% HAM r E ABET 15137,8 —00100 oo.»ee•wee•eee•• IIIEp14ER FREDERICK ' A & ''ESTHER' $ 1,0500 SW TAIPAN D1� o.e { 1S133AD -00201 KOHTzDtinas, 110 2184 & 5992 ,,SHORT ST IOREA LINDA 19133RD -00300 .0. .•e•.oeeeme•ee,oeee I d FRANCES E ' 12610, SW TARPAN D% BEAVERTON OR 97005 3S133AD -00400 .0, •» • • e 0 .$$T1:S01 a 0 ►' SOX 51587 tYADH 11553 ,SAUDI` •ARABIA 1S133A0- 40600 A.aae 400 see 4 • *• iaG'W d�.i✓Qr EB i ISAM PO SOX 51587 RIYADH 11553 SAUDI' ARABIA 1S133AD -10000 ••• s e• o .44. s NAVAL/ NO A L AND NAVAL , NICOLAS A AND NAVAL, NICOLAS A 'JR E 10705 SW 127TH TIGARD 18133AD -4 0200' „ • •o•eeeo•os••o•ee•':ie • o, NGUYEN, BANG PFUOC AND BAN KIN TSI 1200 SW TARPAN DRIVE BEAVER TON Ca' 97005 18133AD -09900 WAGNER, ROBERT G AND MERRILY a 10717 SW 127TH CT TIGARD • • •e'e 0 • e0 0 1S133ADm10100 e • PETERS, B: ANDAC : 10687 SW 127TH TIGARD e e e A•. o e a O. e o a• SEEMANN, � eANDRA KAY 10673; SW 127TH CT TIGARD OR 97223. a15133AD- 310300 eeeee 0eeeoe WILLIAMS, WAS N /BETTY A 10659 SW 127TH CT TIGARD _ OE 97223 18133AD. -10400 eee0 ee40,94044e000000 BIERNI4S , LAWRENCE, ac CYNTHIA 1M! 10647 e°.•W 127TH CT TIGARD OR 97223 15133 -10500 ob•o ee eer w eos•y NRIGBORN STEVUN C 10635 SW 127TH CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S133AD- -1,0700 eomeeeeOgieeeeeeeeeeee SALVATION ARM , CORPORATE BOARD PO BOX 5798' PatiTLAND OR 97208 18133AD- 10600 to 00'e eeeeeseeoeeoaom WRIGHT, DOUGLAS V •'T SA H 10623 1:iW 127TH CT TIC/ 4147J Q 97223 1� +�9��p— dil�w�tl�Ld 1 ®SiA ®" r! e e e • • �3r LOCXWOOD, ` Nl B_r' diN, ittICHAEL D H THELr CHRISTINE 2610 St UTHSRORE BLVD LANE OSW8 00 OR ,,97834 1S133041000 , e'e ,FFELPINGER, WILLIAM T 4 10662, SW 127TH CT it 151'33AD409O0 a ,e o.e a ee" It IN'S. STEPHEN E $c Sum it, 10646 44 127TH UT TIGARD » J...�+...,FU.. .. «lM �M1L «..� ..r. ♦ M r . nr vY. .. *,. 151331 -11100 bee•dl•a.Oem;Neaem+Iyreea QUAcU, 19824 SW 68 TSTAJATIW * wy'r CIEt 01061 :9722 15133- 11240 a re 4.4. e 4. O G& :..OR 10682' SW .1.27Tu TTG I • 470 .?..M.)% 1S3.33P1L113oo,`�o a�e'gyw.s • e, a-,. LLIGAN, 14 PAT$ W K 10690 127TH COURT', TIGARD 151331 D - 115000 $INS, ' ROBERT A DAVIES-1MM, BARBARA 10716 SW 127TH CT TIGm om•eeaeae•••■o , 1S$33AD-12200 see a,� ►' e e o e • • e � • e e . �o �e,n • . »ON MORISSETTE BUILDERS, INC PO BOX 19524 PCNITLAND OR 97219 DON 1S15�31 D -12400 e e p eyg�orga� p �jg• • s e• gi�ep�o+ I' s e e o e D HORXSSE SDZLDERS, .fYNC PC 1301 1952.4 PORTLAND ASS! . JANINE 107,2 OR 97223 - .�i15133AD- -123�n ,M..,.m. e O e''.e w e p'i "O a 4a e• a', LVLLIOAN, UI0H1 ' " ISTIN' K 11347 SW SUI1414ERLATCH IG OR 97223 15133Ao- -12500 ereave,eoeueoweee . D0P1 JLORISSETTE BUILDERS, INC PC BON . 19524 PORTLAND OR '97219 1S133AD- L2600 e ee e'..e is b" e. e e.e e O L e a e. . DON 14OR%SSETTE BUILDERS, INC PO BOX 19524 PORTLAND OR 97219 15134130-00403 .eeeeeeaeeeeeaoeeeeee REAL ESTATE EOUltiE5 JOINT VENTS RY SSF "EN'RPRISES INC ,A 977Z WILSUIRE EmV if710 BEVERLY EIS dA 90212 151331,0 -02500 ....... KIND R -C& E , :'t pRrIING (""c1 'ER5 INvPo x'.36116 .1813413B -00300 .r.e,e o at/beano eeea SCROLLS TERRACE "S PARTNERSHIP 835 `SW FIRST STE 505 VORTVAND + � 1013greearAill4U1, e • a :. a e e e a . o . e•• !I' . e e e• .liattSTERS OF PROVIDENCE IN OR BY ST VINCENT HOSPITAL Ads CRAG VAN MI' 9205 5W MIMES RD A`el`�TLiD OR 97225 ' .TAN; DIRTY, BP OIL 2808 PROSPECT 'DR. ,13. -36O RANCHO coar0c1VA; CA 95670-6020 • w o m r. e a• . a o w e e . . Ott4081 '""Di8bEIBX ,1 0 ; I 3 aI , w '�: axe alA`l"gSCE;:c ;IIv Tel VS, 4,d bS,►'' : IPT2A4. JOHN MORC a AICD ATEP, ./NC. PO BOX 13185 . EM0 OR 07:T.6 IEEE CUNNINGHAM 13385 SW °1.x,5' .'H AVE TIGARD, OR *97223' SEOWN 11.E SW . FJORWI1 G HIi4L DR TI RD ois 51223 • • I ITY OF rWIRD, ''' STvg PLAAT AmaTi2BNE ainz Tz OR1juAi ,�a m pv.TRd1TY f, CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW, Hail, Po ''Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION�g g [J= 5dho11 TAX MAP AND '1`.AX LOT NO. Lot 2400 1 S 1 35 AD SITE SIZE 244° x 265'9 1.38 AC PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER' Lee Cunningham ADDRESS 13385 S.W. 115t'h Ave. PH0/ 639 -6940 CI:TYY Tiga=: a 01.E zip' 97223 rLacAAiaT* Brian ; B � R y BP Oil Par ADDRESS P pect k . u e 8 PHONE 916 -631 -6978 CITY Rancho Cordova , C ,._.. zn 95670 -6020 -- �,- ...-.- .....moo... *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization from the ovi&er or an agent of the owner �� er with rriicten authcMization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page, two or submit a *zitten authorization with this application.` 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request a Comprehonisive Plan Amendment (if applicable) from to and a Zone Change ,rom CP. to .G. • OR The applicant requests an amendment to the following sections of the Comprehensive Plan, or Community Development Code; 0737NP Revs` 5/87 • OR STAFF FUSE'; O ?SLY GAS 1 OTHER CASE NO` 9o- RECEIPT ,Nth. AP7-1L1rATION ACCEPTED BY DATE: 4 Application elements submitted:' (A) Application form (1) (B) Owner's: signature /written 0/ authorization (C) ApPliednt's statement (pre-app check list) (D) fee Additional information for Compre sive Plan . Map Amendments /Zone Changes (B) Map : indicating property location (pre -app check list) (F) List of property owners and addresses within 250 feet (1) ____(G) Assessor's Map (1) (H) Title transfer instrument (1) DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: FINAL DECISION DlADL COMP. PLAN /zONE DESI IONa .O 6 Number. 1attain- C0 138ion • ity : Council A PFroval' Date, moo' appl ear : riffs seed . the entire contents of the, app ,idotioo,, , the policies and criteria, and understands 4 the req a��r seate' fear appro' or denying the appli etio n. 1,5 :day `of Feb X19 DATED this � . , ,. � u , urn baibd SP OIL BP OH Compaq Min., adding, SW* 3b0 me Proo•ct Park Drive Rancho Cordova, California 956704020 Phone (918 63,1.6975 Pax; (918 6314965 • ti W I 18133AD -40100 .,...... r'.....'..» NIEDNL'R', PRED'ORIC K At 8 ZST 1 10500 SW TAIWAN DR BEAVERTON' tt; R 97005. 1S .331 D- -00300 • =am, ? WRM 0E8 B , 12610 SW" 'TAR?iN BEAVERTON .•• .0••woa.*er•••..r R 97005' 18133AD- 00'.00;' . r'... • • • ... NCUUN, , DANGi PHUOC AND HANG AII4 THI 12670 SW TARPAN DRIVE BEA,VEIMON OR 97005 1S133AD,`- 09900" • • WINER, ROBERT G AND MBRRILX it 10717 SW '127TH CT' TIGARD OR 97223 • • •._• r • r,. • • 1S133AD. -10100 ................ • .... PETERS, CANDACE 10687 SW 12'x . TIGARD OR 97223 1S133AD- 10300 ..o.••••....•.•.. WILLIAMS, WAYNE N /BETTY A 10659 $W 127T0 CT TIGARD OE 97223 19133AD -10500 • r •.....�...e... NEIGHORN STEVEN C 10635 SW 127TH CT VIGARD OR 9722:;1 161330-10700 .:, .. • .... .. ... •. SliLVATI DN ARMY, CORPORATE BOARD PO BOX 8798 PORTLAND OR 97208 1.S133AD -10900 00000eo ....e.....,. ROBBINS, STEPHEN E & SUSAN A 10648 SW 127TH CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S133AD- =11100 •••..b.:::. QUACCH, TMANH & t11041 ..,4 , 8Ti 1982 S 6 TUALATIN 1OR 97062 2 133AD- 0040.0,: ,ay BTIS�Y 5158; 115531 RIYADH:, SAUDI: • • 8 1l�1'33AD= 00600y, .. •. • .:.o •,. b NBTISAM , N PO ` X 51587 RIYADBt H 11553 SAUDI ARABIA 1S 33ADF, »10000• • .. NAVAL, 1'TAR ► L : AZ4D NAVAL, i LA€ A '.AND NAVAAL, NIC+OLAS JR ACT ?lL 10705 SW 127T1' TIGARD OR', 97223 • 18133AD'- 10200 ....'..,r ..,....;. • • • •. .•ra::•F:. SIC1iANN, SANDRA KAY' 10673 SW 127TH OT TIGARD OR 97223 .; 13133AD- 104,00 .•••.. .•.. .•i..• R»RWENs„ LnwpANCE . P '& CYNT IA X 10647 SW127T11CT, TIGARD' OR 97323' 18133AD -10600 .•••...•.'I••.••»«b•.m WRIGHT, DOUGLAS V AND TI RBSA . `U 10+623 8W 127TH CT TD ARD OR 97223 18133jL0- 10800 .........r••.•. o. orw LOCKWOO , MICHAEL P AND ismer, ' MICHAEL D +t BAR L, CNRIFTINE 14 2610 SOUT'HSHORE BLVD LAKE OsWRG 0 19133AB� -11000 ... • . • ... • ik b • • • . • B EFFELFINOI R WILLI t T 10662. SW 127TEI GT, TIGARD OR 91034 OR 97223 t »• }•r we: . 15133RD -r+11 00 •.. •••= O. 'Or O.OrA M •OITTOi HRu0N G . 8, ?0' R' B. 50602. SW :27TH; CT T=GU►PD OR .9 7 «28 1t. ,.E LABELS - . BRIAN DUFFFY PRINTED 2/8/90 6215-, 6 1S133AD -02400 :: HRABIK. RAYMOND A. FRANCES 262165 = 1S133AD -02500 i INDER -CARE LEARNING- CENTERS "INC. 1395�t6 IS133AD -10600 WRIGHT, ,DOUGLAS '_ AND TERESA H. 13935-75'44131":-14T9 1Si33= t'w10700 �SALVA` ioN ,i MY, CORPORATE BOARD OF 13935.84 IS133AD.r =101 LOCKWOOD, OD, MICHAEL -P AND NATIO N, MICHAEL D. _ c/o BARTHEL,, CHRISTINE M - L.393593 ;iS133AD -ia9OO s"-` DINS, ;STEPHEN_. A SUSAN A 3916001S133AD- 1:1000 HEFFELFINGER, Wi.LIAM -T t1393619 iSi33A�- I1100 _QUACO, TUANH & , IENG 11.393628.; IS133AD- 11200. OITTO,}B!C D. =& ELEANOR S. 11393637.1SI33AD- 11300. MULLIGAN, K. PATRICK 11393646 1S133AD -11400 POTTER: DANIEL s? . & . JANIS E. f; . , T n Arms :GREG VAN PET.T '1333042;= 1S13�S &C�OQ401 : _' S��z 4F PROVIDENCE IN OR BY ST VINCENT•,, HOSP !! cBF ENTERPRISES INC. �20g3360: 1S134BC-00403 - .. ESTATE_ EQUITIES JOINT�__.IRE BY OO1S65`1S133AD -12300 =COLJ4GAA,,.MYCHAEL S. & KRISTIN K, . I2001566i1S133AD -12400 DON 1RSSETEE BUILDERS, INC, 12001567; 18133AD712500 WINTER, LINDA C. I20 1568 1S133AD -12600 GI,LBERTSON, BRADLEY D. '& JILL K. 1261923 =1S13.3AD -08100 . TIEDNER, nEDERICH:A. & ESTER M. 1261932 1S133AD -00200 : BDUTZOUKIS HO1+R & ANN 61941_ : 1S133AD -00300 BEiM, FRANCES E x 1950 ISI33AD -00400 RAJHi, F3TISAM N. 81393664 IS133A7 -11600 MULLIGAN, :KIM R. & WASSON, JANINE P. MDIS,. ROBERT A .A' DAVIES-MIMS, "BARBARA c/o CUNNINGHAM, L E REED 1393655 1S133AD T150G 1393502 IS133 =1 00 "NAVAL, NORI A& NAVAL, NICOLAS A. & AFAi'.L►L, NICOLAS .A JR. ET AL 1393511 1S 33AD =10100 PETERS, CAYNDACE .'SEEHANN, SANDRA KAY WILLIAMS, WAYNE N /BETTY A HERMANS, LAWRENCE F. & CYNTHIA NE`^ 4RN, _STEVEN C. 393520 - 39a,�cU BSI -33Ai -10200 21393539 1S133AD- 103ric"B (1393548 1S133AD -10400 11393557 1S1,330- 10500 13335 SW 115th 2400 PRESIDENTS DR. 10623 SW 127th CT. P.©_?0K :5798. 2610 BOUTHSHORE BLVD. 10648 SW 127th CT. . 10662 SW 127th CT. 10674 :31 127th CT.- 10628:SW =127th CT. 10690 127th CT. 10704 SW 127th CT. TIGARD MONTGOMERY, TIOA OR 97223 Y' PORTLAND OR 97208 - LAKE .OSWEGO OR 97034 =97223 TIGARD €-0R 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 7223 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 7.7223 -_ TIGARD OR 97223 9205 SW .BARNES RD. PORTLAND OR 97225-- 9777 :WILSHIRE =BLVD, #716 BEVERLY HILL CA 90212 11347 SW SUMMERLARE -DR TIZARD OR 97223 P a 0.B0R 19524 PIRTLAND OR 97219 '.1334 SW SUMMER "LAKE DR. "IGARD -OR -97223 11312 SW SUMMER 'LAKE DR. TIGARD OR 97223 10500 SW TARPANDR. BEAVERTON OR 97005 5952 SHORT ST. YOREA LINDA CA X12655 1.2o1O SW T'APPAN DR. BEAVERTON OR 97005 P..O.BOX 51587 11553 SAUDI ARABIA 1{ 714 SW 127th CT TIGARD OR.:97223 10716 SW 127th CT. TIGARD OR 97223 10705 SW. 127th CT "TIGP.RD `9R 97223 10687 :;W 127th CT. ' T'IGARD OR 97223 10673 SW 127ch CT, TIGARD OR 97223 10659 SW 127th CT TIGARD OR 97223 10647 SW 127th CT. TIGARD OR 97223 10635 SW 127th CT. TIGARD OR 97223 'MIS A111181031 AD -00500 NGUYEN, DA14017P OC _MD HANG KIM THI ' 12670 SW TARPAN= DR; BEAVEt4TON'. AD -0Q600 � RAJHI EBTISAM H PO BOA 51587 RIYADH, SAUDI ARAB: MICHAEL K AND JEANNE R 5970- SW SPRUCE BEAVERTON BB-00 i 1 SCHOLLS TERRACE APTS PTNSHI' 838, `SW FIRST:, #500 PORTLAND dIW S J1311191D31 a Bamen Tigard Planning Department', A• Se':', 27r. 1990 CPA 90e0003 /SON 90- 0,001,.' CUNNINGHAM/BP A request foe'` approval of •Conapreheneive Plan Amerndment to change the land u ®e doeJ,g lat,iarn °:frost C • , (Professional : co i ercia1) to r C-G `(Gen®ral Commercial ), " &r&d' tr6 Chang: th zoning designation ' from C -P to C -G. ZONE: C-P (Professional Comersit,. LOCATION: 12528 SW.Seholl s Fer ry Road , (WCZ iSg 35 AB; -tax lot 240,0, ) Attsached is the Mite Plan "and ,applicant r ® statement . 'for . your . re! isw. from`' information supplied by ariowe departments and''.agencieo and. from ochor information' av .ilable .; our Staff, ;a report and recomnaendation will be< prepared., and a decision gill ba rendezed on the proposal in the • near future,',. if you wish .to 'dot :sent ,fin this 'application, need yo''r carrente by, «' 9 i99„ (�. You may use they Y space provide&�t below or attach a ' lap a�rate ,lette�k to return your comments. If va�� `arq, use le to reegond tho 1 p pease p hone the staff coat a a t ao�nenta ands onf i comae ants in writing al.' soon ac pos Bible: _ 'you have any 'queetioane� re�3ardirtg;' this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Sox 23397 ,13125 i�W.` Hall a�.` d. , ` Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE s f 39- 4171. STAFF CONTACT s Jerr Offer.. PLBASH CH$Clc FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY= �e have reviewed the propo®43. and have no objection®' to • it.' Please contact l'our office: Please refer to the enolosed''' lk:tter. Written Comments: .....tea . ,, Herne Of Person C onting: Phone HuMbert bkm /tlCPA90- 03.HKH ,,t } A �ro ' •n J t CITY PO No.. TS NUT /FICATI N 2 copies; Building Inspector /BradR oCity, Recorder!: Engineering /Gary . A. LIST FOR 3. nPNCIAL ISTRICTS Fire. Dietriot pick-up box bldg.) _._._. Tigara W.A. 884: SW Commercial Tigard, OR. X7223 Metzger W'. D. 6501 SW %N lore Forry Rd, Tigard, OK 9722? AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Usa '& Trans!). 150 N. First Ave. R...1_1fshoro, OR 97124 'VP-Brent Curtis Kevin •artin Joann Rice __. Scott King Fred Eberle j Mike Borreson 1/ lr City of Beaverton % ;tin Hendryx PO Bond 4755 - , 4755 SW Griffith Beaverton, OR 97076 State Highway Division Lee Gunderson PO Box 565 Beaverton, OR 97075 General Tole hon 7. SPFCI AGENCIES F e, Mike McSherry /Beaverton 4155 1W Cedar Mille B]. rd. , 97005 Bob C,,,iaen 12460 SW Main 97223 Northt4eet Natural gate Ronald D. Pc lvi PR, PLC 220 11W, Second Ave. Portland OR 97209 TCI CabZ etieion of Oregon, 3500 SW 'Bond Alit-TILAii0.D.0 (11201 e At dik , APPLICATIONS , CPO o. , Parks" &Recreation ,Boar Police Other' School ;Diet:, No. 48 Joy Pahl. PO Box 200 'Beaverton, OR 37075 School 'Diet.•..No. .23J ,(Tigard) 13137'19W Pacific awl'. Tigard, OR 97223 Boundary Commission 320 SW Stark Room 530 Millsboro, OR 97124: 'METRO 2000 ,SW let Ave. Portland, ,)R 972 ©1 -539q Othbr ` ortland' General Electric Brian Moore PortlM'd' General, lf" i' C. 1465$:1* ld Scho11s'' Ferry BeavCrtofl . OR 797007 Metropolitteoi A ' e !Iarlad cook' Twin ' Oakn 'let hnolC 1615 NW, '169th Placed' ,S Beatvart my OR 9' 006.48E sac .f it Wo t w 'o c. nloation S .51'3AD1111DQ' .' • ,• • e • • to & Iul�i%1'4 1,9824 SW 88TH ! :cr_w' ..: x . ,. .. ..s 1.. a .. w > .. ! _ :' .. A Ai !. f. .. ,. .. Xu� +� ., . 1r f,7 , .a. as .. u. ,,. .....; t:. ,,. Fi,' a.. «,..1. ,q �..., Yl. ../4 A .- � ,..,.r � a. �.. rv. .. �..0 �. . �F -• `.�� . 4 h ..4. I+. �' A ,fie, iV. i. .�.. ,.. fi... �� .W i�.'7. wi . .`t .M1x f!.l...: �. ... 1,. ., ��{ n .. - ��l... !. r, ..f' .. b, �...;., .M .1'� µwk .. ,�., (py}F v�. � N'•y .,a 4 h .v "ySlt.. (. 3'•'.• .t ... y..%:!4��u.. ... iP.`r�Jl..I. .A .M P.. r... G' .1._1:i,.ek.�..'r�lA.!1.^._S... t�..f,.,...u.. ..). �i. Y..., e.:,'! i". I1�. S�., ..�.�Ib'!'�M.iL,..n_'4.� „4.IMfi t...T,.. J IL.. r, JI. C`. Fh? L.,._ t.;.. ur..... C\': 4”: L4��F. . „�.1:[rLfI�.JYN.1"tt...�..PikV R.Yri�'. �.�i�.r .x. . �+ �G1 26r! rM. 4il Hk�, q��J .�.�..A1�R.,u.S,..hJ:,i...f�7_ti .. F�a...r.��:.. �1. .,1... • w° ST & EL I AICTOP iilEYS AT 'LAIN •,,`) 1990 CflYj3.ARD June 29, 1990 • Lee derpr( State Iiigllizety Diviion Oregiiin,,,rept. of Transportation 2131 .W. Scholia; Ferry, Road Po id:land:I OR 97221 lite: BP Oil Berviotia Station at B.110 North Dakota and Bohol's' Ferry Road Dear Lee: 11 ,2'NZTLE" plIONE, (503)248.9085 s _ 11, NCORP — 3 21. ,01. — A jilt OREENFELD This letter confines our meeting on June 29, 1990, regarding proi3osed BP service station t the above location.' Also attending that meeting were Gary Katsion and Bruce Haldors of Kittelson & Associates. The main topic of di.sctissio.n_was access to, the service statton from Scholia Foy Road. You indicated that you saw no problem" with a right-in oil3by access off of 1,$ch0110 Ferry Road. You said it is logical for all needs including impacts on the interseotion. You said You would l'enteikain" a ricjht-in/right-out on Sob:Tails Ferry Road. However, there May be toroblems with a right-out, pert with drivers tryinv to cross over to the left turn ,• lane for a 3.eft turn from Scho3.1s Ferry Road onto S.If. 125th. You indicated you would like to see the circulati.on pl.en for the site, including the si.t,e layout and distribution, to determine whether a right-Pout also wotticl be aippropriute at the site. I appreciate your taking the time to meet with us. If I have misunderstood any of your comments, please let ma blow i3romptly. a tIJG: cc cc: John Van Curefl Gar?: 1(ettstion trit 16. y w oo ey op-Tiem.‘52L4utit.A.017 truly yoll.:!irao • , • • • .• • . lit Isis/ail /Yid 1.2116) ittl,t1111 Calliffibitaii. flak pis) Cleo ft4‘31m ‘20i)o-.." • • 0 Ace. 014ect 049 taio • clas)17210, ' •irat ,(1,7)rreisie (go) 014116 .'It.tist!)6611414172.13(0*A' • „ (IC)2$�� (31111),P1-110: 11111471111 maiaiwitte jut 44 PA1WWNPflAP$�FVNLtO1t1JAThN ' • L. On behalf of the ',applicant B.P.'.1,'011„,' „ appiiation , in the aboveiltentloned, - matters, .',r)ret4eilellv before . „ Council. The Council consi1ered this app].ic!Iti'n at its April 23, 1990 mool7,4rig but took no fthal acion on the tte Under Oregon law :Lana use applicat:40n. :betpro. a local govrnment may be withdraWn. , at any time prior ..action” beixig taken. H,,,1 See (1983) Such, this is no longer )e.or the City • • , ' • ; , ' • r• r • ' • • r , , , r • .r • r • . , ' I , „, rr ,r • , ' ; ' ; AGENDA. OF: SSUE /AGbNDA Plan `Ainendaaen* aPA . 90 -1003 /Zone Cha TIGA1.. ,QRLGOp rJ0'i7NCI?t' AG, DA 41, 19901 rehe naive •. ZON '',90;400i .', than • ham: BP 1 1P DBPT OK A LI e t CITY ADMIN OK ` ,,,f u . l i1 re .ini stein as.oss :a.i....ssoosaoific i..*** , ra r"••=iumni sages., 1TE SCIBI SD s , PREVIOUS ACTION: on ' 4/3/90; i Coui is REPR�RSD BY: UE TED EY:; 41 Planning' COMM lire,„ Li. . o 23 901 n T . - vssa{: sis�eat�saac�L.^-�s�s�s>,r`ssa .. .'POLICY_ ISSUE: Shoo d 'the City adopt findings' :denying. changes, to t'he comprehensive Lan 9oning asap" designations . of a rpariasl at ;thee eouthwesterr; Corner, of SN 'Scholls Parry Road an i' SW. North Dako� a Street to allow ci nera Ccmo,eraiai, �erelop nt? ' , �srais�s��ms�ara�lrie' �vsert�ar�ar :asre.�aas :r�i�ssaass =se isaoeagae�'. esaresasrsarsssers�Yr9as� :.�sass�at>er;rs.ussar INP ORMATION 01lMARI' e e to the `Planning. Coy mission a staff rw_ Tl►e� Planning Division eeu,�a � g rec cimuending denial of 'the, above ,,,c1900*-ibed : ';appli�at`ioai.' due primaril yA to tc+ ens related to traffic c:ongeation, traf £; safety,;, and the 0atisene0 of finding o£ a change in circumstances a ffectin� 9.he al Plan sand Goninq designations. eav por ®Io so ►tirc® Mistake' in. the original 'noted, that the City ..of 1 Tigard EngineeriLrlg' , Division`, City of ' Beaverton, And' Oregon Stato' . Highway Division ' also recommended denial of the ,application for, ei gr ` re ecan3. to Planning • li The Planning: Com�a#.asonalona�w�ith -the hear�'� lc tenet Division ,, Staff report g '`pub tnionyy on the proposal .at' the Commission's April 3, 1990 meetingl. The Planning Cm fie ..rn. reeomended g the Neighbo al Plan designation end ° "C- N zoning a ®si nment of i��,��►csd Coaa3rcl4 designation to the parcel instead of the 'requested designations: On April 23, 1990: the City C'uncil reviewed the PlanningIDivieitin staff report and Planning Commission g a . 'aublic hearing `` on eke v`. ed to deny the ' ` l�.cati:on The City Council �n °�• appli�lkation the. meek minutes � and conducted /Application. Y t Y � w 1 ,findings conta�!.net in the Planning Division staff report. ;The. coilincil dir gted t=_ p p resolution denying the application. shed. ..are a staff to r�� area a r®soluti pp ,�t�a resolution, exhibit A ` staff report), and exhibit B (trap) aersssasssmmmmmuaadeargar�ena mmamsr"mma �xsssr.:esaai�s�oa ,erne :>Q�eve:>Qaesaa�emmx �TL�RNA°VES CONSIDB�.�..D Adopt the attached revolution. �saa�• aramssma�sssses stars mmassusnoss�to ` ��s�s�s And Adopt the a�: GaGhe�\ 4�sss�rs�ss. raes,. aasaeara: toiesngsses�esss m�sasaasseriei :�ar�a�ts+tsoaaryar. Modify sac1lution F's CAL IMPACT None. I n• I I, . . •ate ,. sixssrs�aaaasrasssemJxamesaressssriortmmsassassstsas4 •sava�s�s �amassss�ereesartksssaita fass�araxse. . ease .sccsmmmmmmssssmmaemids��smmmtr.� Adopt the attached resolution. . SUGGESTED ACTIN!' ti rr• S J% c isdi.ction L. OF x`16. A Dante Naaled'ju,J 1Ir,, Local File N tuber C. R- ROB = o - 0001 Date Praposal was Provided to DLcD m U Ate. A of Proposed Anion (Write a brief description of the proposed r l� e rca.l� Srekss C--X? ,ea J� �q�4 ,016, 771e- This Proposal Was: _ Withdrawn ease contact, , the .DLCD d��on `green paper.'Y Motion ,' .1iii,',,••COUtidii.oi, listen .'', seconded by ' '.m..iyor , .Edwards ',,,' to ,,,,, .., .'caPPrPra'....410Pri.,, 'AgPl!claXtfzIm**,2.:. (efA.P1-11.:4PP'''N'P',1',''Pq,1?)4-', -:':r1P.-,,'.:,'''','„:',-: imotion .; ‘,P0;0000..,.PY,,0:''HSaloil:Olt yote:,.P-g.''': Caii7.1P-44L-':'''Prtitt,, '''''!30'.-71,',-.' 011 ncjAor Schwartz , ,-;'abs.'tar:41164,,, ) .,courictiOr.,:$0i*..4r4,',:'001:41.004,',.:1' .,.• ,,:.,:', ''',,, .„. . -..,, h40,,'. ..*.:eaSOn.:for',' abstaining ir r, 4,:Ot i±,; t,t!I1't1.:4, , '.'4P0..,- 1 .. _1.:_0 *. .,.,... t., ,.:.!.,.".,0,, ,, request ., . .,: represented 4,5P%, iporee over and 4 0*e sign code provisions for size. Approva1of such an increase aoridern 4d,C 64c iiOr ::.. . S0hVartz, for f1iturt,...'..,;403.S. ons; he also ,,tioted that. ,,j3wxne-,_.se,p, . , .,, . , . . , , , ,.,, ,.- , ,,,,,•,,. ,, have been., asked :to .,replace nonconorntth „,t'l :pi, sighs. ,- ,-. - ....,' ,.. ,....,,,, ,......., . Y, 1' ..4:Y1.4:,,, ',.„.'',' a'.'itIV,V,z4 -1,,,,,,« -..- ,t---,,,,. '1 „glitmg_tflici ',.._. jm1.,_,''.4"0, , , , .idin ..e, t , ' • . , ' - ' ; ° d .1”" , .,.E.iti ^ , 11.4 ■ , A request for approval,. of a Comprehensivd. Plan Amen ,en to - change the land-use. designation „for - 1 Z8 aCres . from Professional Commercial to General C6mmercial, and to change the zoning designation from C-P to C-G. LOTION: . 12528 ...1 ,, Scholls Ferry Road (Weill 1S1 35AD, Tax 1.0.7c 2400) . 4.1 b. There were; no declarations or challenges. c0 Senior • ,," • reviewed this agenda item. The rl.'',nriirtq' Planner reVieWed , (40MMiSSiOn.,,,reVieWed' a request for a. Comprehensive Plan Amendment froM1, commercial ' 'Professional to Commercial General and a Zone Change froM., Profe'ps4.nal) '.(Commercial:„ General) on April 3, 1991.) or, ,T40 ,Commission decided to ,:recoMMerici,v, an alternative proposal .: the oortheritt portion of the property commercial' Neighboriood and to retain a smaller area to the 000t.4.,,.f Or ':',"Ottimerdial.H. Professional use. The.. applicant was 4dvisda. iby the staff to suggt the amount of area desired. ,.fOr,,, each designation - at the Council hearing. !ula,l es 1nen' o Cal Wooler ►,� 12356 S. ur , Tigard, 'Oregon; noted his concerns for the Commercial ,General zoning' in this area . advising it "would be ,incompatible 'with the area ' l Jeanne Rohiff" w1.24 30 s .Nor,th, Dakota ". Tigard, r'Oregon advised i she' was opposed �tt cOi erci:al General zoning in 'the area. She " said � there was ,no mistake. in the 'CCmprehensive'. Plan and ' .that tra f`;ic spe ►ds and volumes were ` already' a' 10roblem n ea Further, sagety and. for ithe ne; ghborhood would be negatively imparted. Ms. Rohlff ad ..;3 of der disappointment of }he citizen involvement � n this' is sue., °Sher. advised that' ' the NPO 'shad not contacted the neighborhood . Eor' input. She said she bias concerned";' that an individual on the" NP4 was personally 'in ol'ved n t he development of tha,zs property,• she said he shL�' ld have re Loved himself from participation • in discussions on the project: Ms.. Rohlff noted" that there was. a public heari"n scheduled for, ;next week on a request ,for temporar'; closure of S. W:" " North Dakota Street Since ar*a decision to develop this; ;property would affect ._.;;. street as wo'.l, she .Suggest ad the , hearing on'° proposed..CPA, and Zone Change be tabled r til : after' the street 'Closure ' public ;heaving . Jane Hunt, :.1'05 S.W. 12311'i.d t Place, ' 'igar d, `reg noted she agreed with its . Rohlff i s 'testimony referred to the S.W. , North Dakota neighborhood upcoming public hearing for temp racy sere closure. MS. Hunt requested Cou it to '61 er v;o liftoff on, the applicant I s . propoEta l "o o tal e matter urLti l afte.L the s tr' iet. hearing .. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTI egon ro osa .R� bin ° Oregtn advised hr backyard abuts the subject ty. She noted was opposed to the proposal hacaus6. of concern about noise, iticreased traffic, Ant,A r;ot,liaritial of vandalism. , h Tigard. AsisLitionitLasr. Zee tunningham,. 13385' s'.W. 115th Avenuei., Tigard, Oregon advised that traffic, problems were the result of 'rapid growth. He recounted tIi history „ff of development, in the area., noting. that as stations lied been allowable on nearb 'ProPertV ; however,, a gas station had not been buil. 14e noted the cooperative efforts of BP 'Oil they had agreed to remove te, car' business liipatitis to -‘-tiieeioghi*O.--r6.,' ',Zh,,, „. addition, addit BP would increase laadscaping and buffering. , , • , . . • Rebuttal Proponent Mr. Duffy .tefettect,t0' the concerns by opponents wanted,. this ,...issias tab1e until after the hearing on the ,,North " .Street tke-- advLsed that business would not be dependant not this steet was closed Mr. Duffy rviewed • , pr000ss",':,, his cnpanr had followed, nting that they had made thei pragentatioh"til. the 14P0, in March. , W4S an application for 'i'etoriin4 site then be oess,, Additionally, , he advised their only one story and that their business and the resxdeitial areas W�ld be o Jeanne "Itoh ented that it Wa tifficu1t td se CITY Oc)t.114-16:ti,i,I.t4EtTIN6 'f•tititkr,t ,„ .„ / ■■ I ' I n n Susan- how the gas ".• station affected access Would North Dakota was closed. *, 'she' advised be necessary from H orth'Daketa. .• • • • • reiio„ Planner X4de revl *ewed,the,,recommendation by Crnnnunity Devel�pment Staff: Staff de • of th appxjaant'!Sm rpguest•.41c'1111arilY, due to h.e adverse traffic impacts to bW:ies4tiated• with 'change.' He ,adyised that the Planning „Conunissicirt, recommended ,` an retain „ a , smaller „ portion r. • t_ t o n f the property oe aeproposal rtr,et°aYP, °Commercial sta0 th°• e designate es gte. ag hek for °tt.4 Commercial cl and att n°1 Professional uso-p, , • - Pub13,1e: nearing was clOse(i. • , • . , • Cou7icil comments: Each COuncilor present noted that they would support staff 's recommendation. There ults no finding of error in the C6mprehensive Plan nor did there, appear to be a subotantial change in circumstances. BP's efforts to modify their proposal to negate concerns of the neighbors were acknowledged, TrLsmsportation issues . • . • • * were also of concern to Counci.L.' '.• . In response to a question from. Mr. Duffy concerning a procedural question on the process, Legal Counsel • reviewed process for a Comprehensive 'Plan AMendment. ' City Council would make the final determination for the City on the proposal. Staff and P3.anni.ng CC1111111$1a1,011 Iere advisory to the Council. . Motion by Council Kasten, secondtid b Ci'ounthi.lor 'Schwartz, to direct staff to prepare a resolution upholding, the 'staff's recommendation to deny the request. The motion was approved by a unanimous Vote of Council present. PUBLIC HEARING STREET., ATACATION FOR. POR9PIONS OF 4:kit LOC:UST STREET , A request for vacation of r.io _ t;tions S. W. Locust Street was initiated by City Council on March 12, 1.990, in acbordanCet with an agreement with trlestoi'l Investment Company in order , , accommodate a new street alignizeilt. Any torritten remonStrances were to ,haVe been filed with the City Recorder by April. 23, 3.950, 7 30 p .n1 L. Public hearing was opened. There were no declaratLons o challenges, , CITY cot)11cIL MEETTI,T.c;, MINUTES 1IL23,, 1990 ft( /WICIZES.PIECti two 17 1RZ 21• 199 TIC, bars Present: L e Ginn inghain, Jeff ' H erle, lind r, die McKee. rena:ens focused: isitc Nancy Robbie 'Linda ,Debacia too ck Kranewittex, • R SIC ATICyNS. During recent phcra ybe sations with . Rick Kronewi • . :' _ `r ) axiil�.trced. th both Jim Boylan (Chairperson) and well d axe resigning g free NPO ; 7. :gin addition, Rick YC�ewittet ) announced his resignation as he and his wife had l cased a haze moving out of Tigard's city limits. SON. OF tarry - e Lection of NS�aGlinchy s�'ted that tlY pr meeting This .ways aged a>i mowed to . Zile 1'fE*xt toile L.__ it_ a on the Mardi 21st ate. Election of officers to., zxiclulde chair, vice -chair, and seceetar . y . P)PK , TO REZONE. Lee Cunningham presented a letter fran the BP Oil Campany offering to address the NPO regarding rezoning land at the North Dakota for a gas station. The. southwest corner of Scholls �-�'Y' and this rezoning proposal , and NPO, decided it wanted crnu,.nt. the Pla Carni.ssr on delay l iear ng and action ; on this issue until Saone �ranu�g � delay ,� meeting. Ci on this�e � n time after the � 21 NFO ,� NPO � receiving written information fran the City meeting's agenda is nailed out. ;, NPO mks Terre also interested in securing a larger size conference at:oan for this ` meeting. Lee Qinningham ,. took responsibility for inviting the BP Oil Company to the next NPO meeting for an 8 :00 presentation. • BULL MOUNTAIN TRU$PORTATION' SIOM. It, action was taken on the, Mountain' :ransport arlon study because there was net a quorum oNPO nanbers :1 interest in an a '.Y G. rearablent of new :ambers to fill vacancies on the NPO. The : toll suggestions were. made: A. The City of Tigard sh ild advertise ct enhts .a9i\ 1t' t in a " • Scape" S@'r ctaion of "All About Town." of NPO sho with this advertisement. B. A similar ad should be run in the "Tigard T C. Individual NPO n.1e. llhers should friends a meeting¢ in hopes they would uld s resider pining. inin g. r' V 4. II would like to make myself ava association on our proposed, veek of Maria" 121 1990, I Tit available at their convenience. writtIrng rthi.s regards purchase o'F. .the .,pr�opery "�+ Bret's etr�oluai., t� "North„- to and Sc Pi, 's %a P This letter is a protest agaxa.nt ;the possiblea rezoni' property in question it wi.rsll create, a, increase traffic, , ,noise; ,and fume s.' To an 'alr�eady,.r�a;pici..ily agrowin area. blot to mention the s,`er(4 .e.' station ! erng open all hours, also a coin oper'°ated ,s :.ar wash, , whers ".,several residential houses are, right` next to the proposed, sa�.ghta; T`he list of names attac ';are Summer La.;e Resident who ,would like to see . the pr opsaTf rejected and leav�yr cr zoning as i Thank you for your lrie. 4 k p o ! inib (about `300 f t i and lees' than i! qu hie�a p residential area of the fbp,„ Summer Lake;, subdivision, Mill,` ; oadly , affect • to all people health in, `this ktrea, i pecial.3 to t' he childreen, and " to, the ' pat;ietivte, and also may a:k3reate potential. of explosion and :fire dangerous tO childx?, ee n,, less ; t ap' obi lity of eeca[ing. erry Offer Tigard "'Planning Depa nen'" P. 0. " •Box 22297 Tigard, OR '97223 GPA 9O- OO(3/VAR 90 -0001 NINGHAM /BP Tax Lots 2400; ` Map 1S1 -35AD Da4r Berry ;Cities of Tigard and Beaverton have worked hard et limiting retail The S .W. ;Sacholls' Ferry Road. It is rec,ognited +.:hat cor:�aercjLal development. along . streets.. .. impacts . � development is However, it ! ac$ntase detrimental �ommerrial Bevel® mem � ytzeessary How on abutting residential pry ?pertiee, as well as adj concern with regr�'xd to this request, is that of additional access Of particular provided . the Scholls Ferry Road. The City p as was reviewing ' this . , ;rnal,sis only evaluated the proposed use by B" -P. Oil, and other traffic .. , �' � retail ,xses i�that could be allowed under the zoni.nri. Other uses greatest: iamp t..4ts Should rye request be approved, development should .necessitate the 'dedicatiOt .,_ p ,� �onditionea. to Furthermore, develo meat shoald be c for Scholls ferry Road. � or ,provide cash in =lieu of a.ctuial either construct the Scholls Ferry frontage improvements.. s leas �o contact me. 4M If ��u have �� q �e feel free �, at '526 -2 Y � , questions, F Sincerely, James N ' . Hendryx Principal Planner F -1842 4755'' S. Griffith Drive, P i7. 6ax 4/55, Beaverton • ?fl71 '4 t wl , y �1. GENDA '` ,Sii REPORT TO TEE PrAIGUERG CoMNISSIOP ' TATAR /NG . DATE HARING LOCATION A,pril', 3, . '199 : - 7`s Tigard city Rall 13125 SW Tigard, OR, 9722,3 General .Information_ CAS!: REQUEST?, APPLICANT: Totgn Hail" comprehensive Play Amendment CPA 90 -0003 Zone, Change ZON' 90 -(0O1 1) Plan Map . endment from Commercial Professional to General ^ -rciai 2) Zone Change f�ycm7 C-P (Professional Commercial) district to Cam:, (General Corarcial) district Briti-h Pat rccrleum Oil Co. AGENT: Richard Wool;p. c/o Brain Duffy, DP Oil John Morgan 3868 Prospect Drive, stet 3G 0. ATEP, lAc- Rancho Cordova, CA, 95670 -6020 4040 Douglas Way. Lake ,Ontate go, OR OWNER1 Lee Cunningham 13385 SW 115th Avers e Tigard, , OR 97223 LOCATION:' 12528 SW Scholia Ferry Road! PnOPERTY DESCRIPTION: WCTM 1S1 35AD, Tax Lot 2400 back rourn3 Information :. 34 the Thy ;;� ti,�. Council on Ida)/ 'i2, ;�96► ��se!�ed a resolution recogni g_ conforming a ®e status of co r sales use on this nonconforming ued _..retail ea �,a n, property cReeolutioe "! .. 86 -'.i4I , to other ,sand use or dev�aloPanent .. tie b�..aen. reviewed by the city of PP a lications regarding this site ha� Tigard' '"ormati,oU Properties abutting t, ie eubj e ►t site ors '-he w est and south are coned a• d unity a cre Plan.edDev elopment) . Propeaxt.ea to ' r ances which are located the r,teat are rev ®l,opod With ivisior� f TheyR ee�.:�,. y .. . a , , within the Su ±nerlan�ke subd d « inderoare da�i care center' is y u�)i of the sitr�. Prop�ertiiea to the east across SW...Nu . immediatel'. ' eca , ort1� Dakota Street �y Fed. With a cued are zoned, C�,N (cyrreasta. ,wing debeio wce► 08 STAFF REPORT CPA -90 -0003 C O O O -0001 I .4411:1g0 PETROLEU titv H 1 • • 1 '« r 1 dt 1buiYdin� y , -P (vacant j , and t C t, approval irocanthy,. office �� t��csonwa ' a McDonald • e ceetauraft) . 'Iris: rther ea jet ,1„. ,� ,: shopping center., Iu rther aotinth on ,Ytno ; o i•t .ide of; the eta me .and, the Anti +n Park° f audivi�3ion ; �Pz 1�sadovdreek,�' Apartt�, ti � tale 1Siorth ;Locoed ' Dcholle. Fa3rry `Road yore ,'wit►hin Beaverton. Fite Informatiof, and Propo ®al ay crpt3:oni; ite is a 1..38 acre r.cteng4l ? 40 shaped eito "1o04' in o „rye . sfit.: Scholl�e. B'er , , R04a cnd eouthiteet quadrant of the inteiee`.it t 8W North D" kota a�treet .; . veterifl6 1. �:inic a ibeatod .n a single e�tory ha�uleo quite. close to the intere*Rtion a A grrave] p rkLng soa is acated i 'atween the houas' and 'W Sa *olle Ferry kc+a�d. '`T .A laucge warn praesntly ueed, ae; a warahouIe 1 y a landE aping * �ot311*t Ofl , and ; located to alts ®oath ofra�eccu* e�yl��1� SZYi er ic manteenance ooaipany ie cla along ;St't :North Dakota Streae/ t. A second ho ;f - ,9, y ., age conl,truction !;,v ainsee ias 4.oce ttad ;further ac ith. r The . ,,'warrhonea and canetiticucti$n: bueinseeeM area noncon ' orming udee in tile, .p>"ere� nt C--P. zone ': applied to the'prop0rty. The applicant.. requeeAte , a Plan Ma amendanen,'C , fcom cou ereial Professional to General Canwnercial ,and a Zone C +,tinge . from they ;C -P (profeeeio ial 'Ccn nerciai) z�onJ «;rng dietr.ict. . to 1..kie C-G (Qeine: ' . Coameroiat4 zonin district' ¶/ ie a licant haP vubenitted 'a .statement -' 9' � *� . � � � S�9g0 'anc�� a deeigndted r,�ttezoninc,�, M licati ®n date. Febrru�iry� 12, Trans rtatic)n Anal, Y e for 3P X31. Cam_ atioi9 woui y dated . ? etrua 3 99A e of; the► request. A3.though the proposed redeei n , id make . the euk ject. property available foie dsvelopaneht ; of any of 'Oe e al use® aU OWed " e C -C zoning dt®trict, 'tho, in t � .. ®,tie a tnt a s Rezonin o A l lcation acid Trans ,.l4r,,._.. � 4 ati�an Anal eie f ocu.a applican . - --- ---�- car. waeYs /eonvaenen�e say u ®e of the site for a Gomirined veh3',eaie+tinc� vnterinary,`p c+�ice to �t�ae ' etoce along with k,$location of the ,1 ra sO iLfinern portion wy. utar�bi l cleanl aalee io a . of ''',',the p�op��" Ve�.icle fue' condLUornal nee in th'.� C-G *one.' A ing, :convenience food atoree, and pxofeeeional. JUUiceb ate examples of pe *nutted uses in the C--¢3 zone. eeuod poi me set .0 1, tbo ±t } ►pertiata' .a :he, City Acrenc .a_..` Conn►ment�l The Engineering D,Lvieion had reviewed the propor }al and cffere t following commanta: + icant t6) Bu A traffic aina�tyes`� tae been eubmi;tted k►y the app3. the ra deft for the 1y . r� Ur q•' or a chanc�aa in zoning. The traffic' anal ei.�'aes ' that, if i :the zcinO change IS alpirs'plitidi the property wil developed at !'a service station. The reques ted zone change Would a11k5'w tna develog4i4 or a variety of ,retail de t4. STAFF RSPoRP CPA �.o_ o °3 M ZC 9A- 000l, BR ±TISE P Trzo,r� Fr qr Job development would enerate,'averege daily trryffLa volumes Gsimilar1 to those reported 3n the traffic an tlysi® fo a station However, the traffic . "generated durir g, the afternoon peak 'hour could be much greater under ."many of the ,al low a d'1 ; uses. Traffi'- is a Paiticular concern at thin site. currently; the City is receiving many complaints• about,' the volume', of traffic) using SW North Dak a , 'attest and traveling' through the residential" arias , Congestion our Scholle Ferry Road. Retail 'commercial i developmerri t - of the site. 1.o.' likely to cause some increase in 'traffic, on North Dakota Street. Development of 'a' service station could lead to .d greater trffic increase on North Dakota . Street than that ndi ated `' by,• the figures ,';.in the traffic analysis;. due . to the i aique location , of the sibs. There are no existing service" stations 'within one mike o the sitar} Existing zoning and existing development make it unli.�eerly teat' a servicir station will be built within ore mile of the :site,, Therefore, there is a risk that some traffic will be di.17,ert 4 from other. ',routes . in order to utilize' the 'service !station /convenience store f proposed. for the site. Traffic diverted from ' Walnut Street oz' 121st ' avenue .be' 'likely to' uti1izi North Daltota Street to access the 'site. Therefore we recommend that the proposed Plan Amendment/Zone Change bet denied until existing traf probproblems . i ::os in the residential area of Noi th Dakota Street are resolvedh Washington County, E1 Depsrcm at of &Jane, Use and Transportation has recommended that in order to improve traffic movement on SW Scholle Eery: Road, a major arterial & access to SW Scrolls F'er'ry Road should be prohibited for any future development of the site. The orsgon St;aat_e F�,Lghway Divii�i.on has reviewed the pro oeal ehd has recommendted . %lania•l of the prey e . � al due to . th tdr�tial ,fi5r ina,r ®asec?I , nee allowed .b the C -G zone ass c and the effects ot, th aapardr`��o t, mh ; . ' o ration :� ��,cal as0s in additional tF,� of f i�,, , , the C -P zone p,e .. u of the Scholle /North itk�wi.x,l ntarsec . 41 gh. Y commented t icult to r diro�i'v�.eioirx hue also v,Ldawa D trs. to ion ;, t Y c accpr hie cite' from Scholle Fo*t Road because :: such an 4�ecess mould rOwid® conflicts with a planned right turn lane f oe '3stbou d Schollri} to North Dakota Street. The Highway Division is scheduled to cottplete a wi erring and improvement project for this ef3ction of Scho lle Petr y Road within the next; two years. The proposal was 'reviewed by 'sew -eeal '' mem!5re of 'NPO ' '7 at the i rc� two meeting.. Doe to a lack of rl (Fibrilar', ' the 11P0 was unable, ;to adapt an of f icia3a `� recor mnendation. Concerns were raised w th, regard • to t :°aff3,tti impact* on adjacent streiAte and with the computability.: of a eei°vico station with ,' adjacent r�ee fencer i�oaie+re. "T eer�.l mere felt a great need Qxiats for a rservic+ astation in thi area. STAFt. R3P0RT CPA 90-00031WC 910 -0001 r -- BRXTISH P�"%' , The Building Division Tigard ,Water' District, Tualatin Valley: 'Fire Rescue District, and. PGs have', reviewed they proposal for a Plan Amendment /Zone Change and have offered no comments or objections'. No other comments have been . received. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant crite';ia in-this ;case. are Statewide Planning Goals ' 1, 2, 9, and 12; Comprehensive' Plan Policies; 2.1.1, 4:21, 44.3.1, S.1.1,: S.1.4, 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.4,.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.3.1 and 12.2.1 (Locational Criteria for the General Commercial Plan designation) ;and the change or mistake asi- udi qu j Dial Plan Nap Amendment criteia of both the, Comprehensive Plan and Community De slop r c Code. The Planning Division HPGnoludes that the proppoual in only partially in compliance with the arplicable StateW de Planning Goals 'based, upon' thef, ,. following findings= 1.' Goal #1 (Citizen Involvement) is satisfied because' the City lhas adopted a. citizen involvement 'prograim. includ3.ng review' of all land use and development applications by neighborhood planing organizations (NPOs).n addition, all public notice requirements related to this, application have been satisfied. • Goal #2 (Land Use Plrtnniag) is satisfied because this City has applied all applicable Statewide Planing Goals, City of Tigard Comprehensive - Plan policies, and Community Development Code requirements to the review of this proposal. (Economy of the state) is satisfied because the proposed'' • GQal #9 redesignation would not affect the City's inventory of developable commercial land but would ')instead affect only the types of . commercial activities that may be developed on , the subject site. • Goal #12 (Transportation) is partially satisfied because the propoe redesignation would allow development of intensive commercial u�e►i along a na jor arterial, Scholls Farr,/ Road: at i i s intersection with SW worth D akota Street and SW 125th Avenue, collector street ® serving' developed residential areas within the cities c Tigard and Beaverton. Thus, the redesignation and subsequent development of `the site may prove convenient for the reeid& nts of neighboring ' areas that might make , not . presently available fin this area- area provided 12, �hhow®ve3rthaalst�® re P , quires that Transportation safety be considered as part of land use decision making. As described further under Plan policies 8.1.1 and 12.2.1' below, the proposal for redesignation of this site to General CoMmercialfc-q raises significant traffic concerns in the neighborhood of the site, especially with regard to SW North Dakota Street as it passes through the Anton Park subdivision., STAFF PtKPORT - CPA 90.60ri3 /ZC 90' -0001 - $RITISffi ,7 ETROi: ; AG Staff has ' determined that the • 'proposed Plan, Hap/Zoning Amendment partially consistent with the Comprehensive Plan basiod 'upon the findi , , : - 1. Plan Policy 24.1 is sat because reighborhoild Planning Orgliniratiora #7 and surrounding prop owners - were given atottoeof tke-publiC hearings related to t request gala their opportunitr,tb comment on the prOposal. • Flali Policy 4.2.1 will be satisfied through, the development review and building permit processes , at Which, tint, a development propor ti farL- this site must be shown to comply with ,applicable federal, state, and regional water quality requirements including, ,preparation mut, implementation of a non-point source ,pollution control plan in compliance with the ,Oregon 'Environmental Quality Commission's temporary rules for the Tualatin, River basin. The proposed redesignation does not b itie affect compliance with this Plan , policy. • Plan Policy 4.3.1 is implemented through the development rcview process in which building placement and landscaping are reviewed with respect to minimizing noise impacts of a dzkveloping use upon . neighboring land uses. ' Plan Polio 7 •• 5.1.1 is not affected since tlie propOsed redesignation Of ' 1 the site ' would maintain, the site's' potential for cOramercial, 1 develtIelfan't, although Under the , proposed C-4 zoning designation ' - different commerciaL usea would be permitted with different types., of ' job opportunities 'created as compered to the currant C-P zoning. .• , 5. . Plan Policy 51.4 ' is satisfied because the 'prOkodeed -,redelliguatiOe , , , • would not involve coerCial priCrOaChMent,,,, '• Eaeig?ibOrhpod. 1nstead existing Plan and . „ deeigttitione Would be replaced with. other e;:oenierd4111..deitignaitiont.: 6. . Plan 'POliay 5.5.1, calls for',;4■Uff,eritig Setween;different'f':::land:Ueek"..at:,:,' .,:::•.,,,, ..: ..I. .,_ _ Well as , screening of service f areas .- 'and laCilit300.,,I, , This ,004010,,':ie.,- impleme nted through co de Sec tion '18,,100 ,K.,v4ii.ch., ,.40 ,conotio#04 .-, "in,:1*0:rli::::..:'.,-.-.,:i,... taVlei4:' Of .detrelOPtneilt,'.ap1511.0iitioite.,... The subject Site.' 'ie,-,1*0-000001i'''''' ,.. ... that potential Ueda i1I0000H10:the,',..c,9,:teinitil din*.leibt-th001A,..be.:44,*".,-„,",,H,:-:,„..,,-;.,-..,:y .. to Iodate their fa011itlaa7On;:00' site while ',P1Ovl4l00-'"iiPPOPtlat4,- , ... 1...,. , . . .. , .. _ , , _ :_ . . to and . , Mene Of landscape and BOVaalilnti0 '*edi,100:'''''irite'l,006-664:'*4:41110;''''''''''•!:'-'.'"''''''-''''''..::,, ‘ ., , , • „_ ,,,, .• . : : , .,.,:., . . , .. , impacts °Irl:t4e'a0i4cen'00610p0d POPEctli°,titte,,',:.., ... , . . i 1. 0),A0. tiottdidii. ' 14*:■2ti 1404i0- 1:44i-,1,,400- 4,041.-4te:::,tittiSfied010*000,:':''''''':::::',.I,',..,' :1 , adequate public developoiiit,•,,, of ,,i4-0,,'010... . ,,,)ts-O9iOrt, of .000eittio#1r-,tiOti40,,,.40*14,41*i,.,,•*d',1),,I.,, itieiie-*h0,0iti,;4ii0HihOli00)i)07104,01,44.ti'OiriliiiideSIOii0i*,?*4404t,''':4;,1I irlig4.d, notifies '41iIioaole. t40 1-, . 1,-.. 0,,. ,•, a H,,,. , P.: 4.,, ,.„. *, *.. t,•„:i. u 4... 1. ).;,1'4 i,., * , i,,,,. L, , 0,., 0, t '* t penati4 06eletelt4PPltt4*ipiti .„ f-' ',-;- ',,• -. ,- • Mi• • iFS a ... DAan Policy 8;.1.1 is ioi�: sat.effed beca't., ( the proposed' reiBesign ,lion could lead` , to development of :uses' on thy►` sit® which) wo *z1:d ?�l expects to ,attract substantially more t .�afric' to - ,the ; sip` clan would be ex4iected with '.development unider the 'existing ir. imercial Profeserional. �C'4') desieriatiaits. This potential increased traffic would tend to negatively in► oaa traffic Satiety on nearby " et / .its.. '` As noted by thin ringin•ring Divip,i001,' this concern is greatest', ruith` regard to 'ElW Worth Dakota: Street throivIn the Anton Pack eubdivislyioni 'south of the site. concerns regarding traffic, vVlunae4 and , traffic . safety on SW North Dakota r:cat' have previously ,been raised by, this neighborhood. befor�a `. the City Council and Planning Carolingian. T he applicant's Traffic . Aim ;yaie, . concludes that davelore►nt cat °¢ a vehicle fuel sales /car was /r�'�nvenience store Fund veterinary elinig`. on the' site would result in, decreased afternoon. peak traffic at the intersection as corn ,aregi to typical development under the C -P zone. The Traffic. Analysis 'alito concludes that the applllcant'a intended use* would have a minimal impact An overall tr f f is 0.n SW North Dakota Street. Staff., however finds that these' conclusions may be suspect at best and possibly may be irrelevant with resct• to future development of the site. First, as. the Engineering 'Division has !p�oiassted` out "deve r prise station could lead to al greater traffic l� nt of.. a service anon ,increase' on North Dakota Street than that.; .indicated ' by thee a igures in the trite... there he trrffic analysis, due to the location of the lei Ls a riche that some traffic will be diverted from ocher routes in order to utilize the service station /convertien'ee ®tote' proposed for the site." The applicants' Rezoning irtoa t,ion dwells an the lack of service stations' in western Tigard yet the applicants' ' Traffic Malysis apparently ignores the lack of service stations along ° to project little traffic to alternate routes and therefore is able P �. the site other than drive-by traffic on St Scholle Ferry toad. Staff believes, that a service station at this oite would be a significant . trk,ffic attractor . for Peotoriatssy' on SW 121st Avenue : leading theft to utilize SW North Daks',>ta Street through the Anton Park subdivision. This could ir„creane traffic hi,tzard.n within this ' established renid ant Lal neighborhoc; >d. Second, the traffic an&jeie could be irrelevant because it leoks only at the theoretical traffic, generation. of the sees the applicant currently intends to develop on the site . rather than looking at the variety of uses that could be developed on' the site if the ` redenignation lc approved. No assurance is provided with a Plan Amendment /Zone Change that it will ultimately d developed as currently intended.' Ownership and intentions (Can Change.° Therefore, traffic analysis for such a proposal Should look at thin range of possible uses under the proposed designations. A fast ',food restaurant, which also' could be developed' on the Site if the zoning is C-G, ' tiaally affect traffic: in the area. to a chained try C -G could eutbstan much greater extent than the use8 addredsed in the applicant' e' Traffic Analycie- I ' Anal...eie assumes that to wo" direct access to SWrschol. y assumes .. t this e3. uld had Pa s Ferry Road. However, Washington County' and the Oregon State Hi;'.:. hwa Di u eat that c trect adder's t Oregon Highway Divisior a ��g STOP .REPORT - SPA 90 -0003 ZC 90-0001 - BRITISH PETROLEUM a ehollh,,shauld be prohibited iwhiehr,wonid thttrefare lead to edditi�n1 traffic, on -North' Dakota Street and :v.neread delays at the xaf , ' *' ,f4• Pin Policy be satisfied Its econditiOn of, OPPFOrla°E any future .develot*Atet of '' the riP6,110101001111 '..imi,rovements .111cing frOntages4W,Ohld be ,required to be installed by the de*eiciper at tr47..,4 tim. of developpect.', The • • 1.'4 Engineering Diviaion and ‘1-4'ithe Oregon State Ui*way DLvri will .1 • ,,' 'review any future deve1opment, proposals.l'or the site., , 10. The .loaational enteriasppeified in Chapter 12 of the • Comprehen.ive Plan are partially. satisfied Cor4the following reahane:, The subject area is not sultrotinded by residential daTteloyiserit On .more than two sides: Residential 'development eaciints on the .'south al:d west side: of the site only:, As discushigt2 above under Statewide Planning Goal. 12 and Plan Policy 8.1.1, staff is- not perstladed that the proposed rfidettignation would not increase tetaffie , on. adjacent street:: -thereby .i,ncrettsing traffic .safety concern': along these streets. This potential increase in congestion and, safety Concerns may 4' exist if the site • is developed as the applicant intends, and is ,4,44 likely if the site should develop with may other uses allowed in _ the C-G zone. The propost:1 fails to satisfy this locational ' criteria for the General Commercial Plan designation. , c. The eite ,is located at the I intersection of an arterial and a minor collector atreet. Access to the ite will be dt:termined in conjunction with the Oregon State Highway Division through the development review process. d. Public transportation is available on SW Schol.le Ferry'Road. e. The site is an adequate size to acCarsTtt2date a variety of uses permitted in the d-C, zoning district: . The sit ti. is highly visible from thot adjoining 'streets. highly Compatibility of future nee of the bite with adjacent uses , difficult to aac;ertain without an actual 'developMent However, the City of Ticjard'a Site Development Review and Conditional title, zeeviLeW processes are intended to iirairide' opportunity for teltlew of a Potntial develoPmented relationlhitv with adjacent e:..cisting uses. In order to approve a quaei7indicial amendment to the Plan aild,tOning',, Naps, the city Must also find that there is evidence of _a chaageIa thit, '1 neighborhood or community Which affec:th the subject parcel. the city must find that there has heen.e migitAke or inCondietenCY bade in ' the original designation of the parcel (comptehenta*0 plant !Volurne',',24.„- , STAFF REPORT =. CPA 90-0003/2C 90,-0001 I.- BRITISH PETROLIS11)1.', '" , • — ,• Olt ' hd Policy 1.1.1, Implementation Strategy 2; Community Development Code Section 18.22.040(A)),a The applicant's RRzeonin9; Appllitcation asserts that a mistake .was made on the Comprehensive Plan Nap with regard tee the shortage of Gene+.t' . Commercial designated,proPertice along the Scholia Ferry corridor. The Rezoning Application atatea that the applicant's proposed uses are intended to help meet the day -to -day needs of the residents of the surrounding! Particular neighborhoods, yet these. articular uses are •not allowed in tine zoning districts that have been app /isd to developable; properties along this corridor. The applicant p)oia:s out that there are almost 400 single family homes within one -half mile of the subject property and at leant the same number of apartments. The applicants state that this is an intense market for commercial uses that serve day - today seeds of the .awea's residents. The appl icants sta te, however, that the Comprehensive l Map . dose not p rovide enou g h a pp ro priate ly zoned land to meet these needs of the neighborhood. t While .:_ten the applicant's business viewpo .nt, a ;nistake may exist with regard to the current Plan de g anon® in that. a 1rxge market demand May exist that cannot.eas f l be satisfied a by the , corrent inventory Of properly zoned developable land, from ..a, .la id use planning viewpoint othier reasons exist for not trying-to satisfy+ every economic market demand. The City of Tigard has paid close attention to the amount of developable commercially designated land along the 3cholls Ferry Corridor, as has t1he City of Beaverton. The cities have chosen to limn:' the amount' of General' Commercial properties- in order to redaco d ne ,Pongestion along the hi:.:.hwa in order to reduce the appearance of traffic to minimize traffic. noise and li pacing impacts upon surrDundin�g 9 yr neighborhoods. This limitation u on Gene g order . 9`' 9 P ral Camanercial des; nations wasp not a Mistake' but instec:d wcOascious decision to 1 imit the amount o f developable commercial properties along Scholls Ferry Road: t redeeignation The City of Tigard has looked po � x at several ocher prog sale fr�r cial Plan of properties to the General Commercial and Nei 'hborhood Canna+_ designations along the 3ch; the �� acrozas North Dakota street frame, thy old. �� Fer Corri dor and the Cit� has ,c& nsistently denied those requests. On the property 4�:.ouncil denims � a r uestsstonChan e the zoning for , j y ci��l �Pi;o g�! sub act ©its, the city the entire -property from Conm'ir -45 o The nal (: "•'P) ".,i :o General Commercial (C G) , in 1985 (CPA 3 85 /ZC 3 �) 1 e �.�� „tsi�n Baas pp g P The ';decision upheld; '„ me Council A a ls. wad . ro e a sealed to the Oregon' Land 1 found that these w �e Boar o e, or additi Was no evtdenc n tae , and . g � e was :.^ overwhelming�ed � ona� de��i nations for this area; the+ General Commercial designated d lands in this area; aid the Council expressed g concern with tr ,Affis alone! both North Dakota Street al. $6h01/101' A later Plan zone Change request for the same p:opeity resulted in .a ,M1 mmc g 9 Pp �'. g rciAl des; nations bein a° r+ ' , Thy► ; soethi' eettf,a� mixture o co portiop x? of the parcel retained the Profeszi6nal.4,connercial Plan ;and. s�oni design tions; ;the eastern portion was designated General Cooaiercial., pan l northwest rtion was gneted for �N 9 e er ial se CPA the po ghbo is currently find r pane with *0, 8�fi ZC 18 -8t; , This nei hhoring ®its ) g ei hborhod�d Commer�.al use a medical office building and a fast £oak:, restaurant4 su stantial STAFF h., CPA 90- 0003 /ZC 9 0-0 t►O1 PETRd►T1141,i4 .d. 4 CONE TOP 1MK�S. 0EMO • la W. CASE: Co aprehensiVa '°pan. l a:daent `CPA 9A -0003 f :A Zone': Change. yJZON, `90 -0001' ,r• I u f• ti 13N�iOl1 � �a�1�c�.a�.l PJlaxi ;Rapp Amendm{e�.,, f' Prof t: General' e rcia' � ) Zone Change :from ,C -P (Professional Comamerciaa) 'dastriol to C-G (General ,ComMerci. .) district APPLICANT• British .Petroleums Oil. Ca. c/o Brian Duffy, Sp Oil, 3868 Prospect Dri'.e, Ste 360' Rancho Cordova ,'CA'956; 0..6020 AGENT: Richard Woellt John Morgaan. ATEP,' Inc . 4040 :Douglas OWNRT'a Zee' . Cunnincthas* 13365 SW 1lath Avenue Tigard,; OR. 97223 LOCATION: 12528 SW Scholia Ferry Roil PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: WC N!'; 2;81, 35AD, 2. Bach�o-ouind :formation. The City Council on May 12, 191. °b; issued 'u re of i ion rec noncon atue o5f continued ret' Hales , 1 t � �'orm3.n uee efi N, 9 . ®olution Rthier site .have hE land ue� or:; applications regarding . en® ev ewed PP � t,. Tigard., W 3. Vicinity Infoen Properties anutting the sh eet ei.te' on he.',Wee R.-7(PD) (RerSidentia ., ? unitsraore- Planned` Dev Flo the west are developed, with aL, ngle family rea94denceea ,hi with JEn the Summerlake su division The, Xinde care day d Properti imanadiat+sly mouth of 'the eite. ee!' IO the .'ealst. Call;ota Street are. ,zoned LAN (currently; ber g +d►.�ve STAFF REPORT �; CFA 9C- 003/' 1 ' SA 0001 - BR TI aurae remitted Or conditional "user allowed Tin- the,. z'onin applicant a Rezoning Anplicai:ion and T rains po ation rt hnalya a use of the site fora combined vehicle fu sl •ales /car ,� ash /con store along with relocati� n of 'the exic�ting veten .n eoutherr Portion Of the ; , property , weh ✓ i conditional, use in , the sow :. food storeit, and ptofesSional offices ,arse in the C-G zone. ency and ;:IvPO Conmiennt The ' Engireering Divieir following domTanta: A traffic analysis hk3 been submitted the request for a chitin e,in a coning. that; if the tone change ; iii appro developed ae a;''service scat .on The requested`. developed for STAFF REPORT 'PA ' '0- t1003,4C .90 -O001 BR CTIS 'iark»:Mw �n�.: �»u�! � w er Centa; FINDINGS AND CONCtri),E t 1 :she 'relevant, criteria in to and 12 comprehensive. d 6.1� 7.1• ',� 7.4.4,' 7.6.1 for the G.Oral comcriercial ggasi- judicial Plan Map /imamden and Coaeiunity.' Aevelopwent Code. he Planning' Ai,N+ 1,.an concasdee; that compliance with. the applicable Statewide' following findings: CGoal #1 Cie sen Involvement,) a' 'satisfies because , t he aC adopted ' a citix,en involve: mat .pg" including review of ail i`land use.; and `development applicaticiha by neighborhood planning , organisations (NPOs) In addition, all pcabl' c notice" requirements „ Felated to this application have been:satisfiad. Goal #2, (Land Use Planning is eati of appliceale Statewide Planning Coale`, C3 Plan policies, and Community ; nevelo eeit� refii2w of :i�ie r ro�tioe�tl. Goal a9 .(Econoe'-j of the State) ie eat40fied bec4d reddaignation ,461.1:04 ne:t :af.fe : the , Ci,ty' a i x,trentora but woult instead affect only '.al ' land , a '1$ the : activities 'that may be developed mn th;t ;aubjec.:;i,a te. Goal #12 " (TransporLati.onjl `Ile .partially sat .aided b au r re lesignati .n would a110,4 ' ''tJevelopment Of intents e ' along a ma,or arteria] , Scholls ferry Moa , at sits irit SW North Dakota Street and SW, 125ti Avonue, 'collector, r developed residential areas Witbtn then cities -of' Tigard' 'those., the iedenici,,natiOn aiid subsequent development' ' prove convenient, fox_.' t ;e �: aidente?-,P. f neighboring make use of services to be. 'provic s on the site Chat are available in , this area. Croak ;` 12,` 'however,~ xE.�io trans rtation tiOAfety be cone. de,.ed' taking. • As desc toed ui-ther Aunde Plan polio 1al for re�a� 3ignatiofl of lc+e�.n'w, the proms � ' Cswal /G,n�G raises significant,? t"affi`ci< neighborhood ,of 'the site, especial; "ly w3 Street as it� paesee through the Anton pa I , Policy '1.1.1, Implementation' Stc�* gy 2; • C�nmtun�ity Devel point c da 8.22.040(A) ) . The applicant • e 'Rezoninc lication asserts ,that, a` a intake wan made oa the Coeaprehenei're ' Plan . ' is p with` regard to the shortage of Genera ' Com erciasl designated opertias along 1-e ..Scholia �grry corridor. The Rezoning Y Ica state' that''t1 e aapp licant4's p��opoeed uses are intended to 'help meet' the .dity!'.;tona.y1 the residents of the surround neighborhoods, yet these particular uses +dre aot allowed in';the.zon #ang districts that have yen applied .;tom dev,$3opa le :properties .:along ti isl t ' corridor. The applicant, • points out that there are almost 4043 single,. fa inily homcev within one -half stile Ar the aait jeact orvperty ,end at least ,the , same number of apartment®. The applicants state that 'this ie an intense market for ccaaaeccial uses ' that sei Qe day -to -day . :-needs ;OH, residents. The applicants state, howev'e'r.,. : that.l the comprehenni' k ,Plain •Hap dcee not nrovtde enough aptiropriaai'4ely zoned land.to. ;meet :'these, nedatd�a 'ofl the' neighborhooA. Whil th a �licant'' a buei day viewpoint, a mistaa►ke ; may 'exist wit In e fran the pp m l ' ..deei sti a� a aearketl de�an� y regard to tie current Pan 9n� on® in that, ; a �. g ry , . exist that cannl t easily be satisfied 'by the .current invent© oft ,properly zoned deveY,opab le land, lirom a and ` use plann$.r ;'vi.ewpoint otheaa rdaaeasons exist for . not trying to satiety every aconomil ^ , Mg Market d Leland. ` The 'City,'' of . Tigard has p aid cloae attention to the a i ount ', of developable comnercia lly • designated land tloag Scholia has the ,;city' of. Beaverton. The citiLesc nave chosen to limit the amount ='of General Commercial prOportiee in order to reduce tr ltf fic congestion along tho highway, irn order to reduce the appearance ,of ' !;trip development, ,and; , inn; order to minimize traffic a noise and ll.ghtine;a impacts upon surroundinegr nei ..hborhoods. This limitation * *pOn General Cc�A" rcial designations ' vas 9 not `a mistakes but instead ,.*4 al conscious decision to ' limit the amount.•`of developable commercial properties along scholia, Fdgbrry The � as looked at several ether proi"+osala for redesignation e C3�4c+� ,of ,Tigard h, of properties to the General Commercial and Neighborhood rcial Plan designations alc.. r the Scholls Perry corridor and the City hate bonsisteetly denied those ri ,eaaats . On the Property ac r066 North Dakota ,,Street t; , th subject site. she City co ancil denied a request to change thetzorni property from Commercial r e ( A r chommercial � (C-G) in 1985 (CPU 3 85/WC 3-as). The COuncile 's 3e- appealed to the Oregon Lands Uae Board sion of hppealp.. the ��;�,� The Council found that theno was reo evidence of .a lamista designations for .his area; there was zio overwhelming need. fo General Commercial designated lands in this area, and the Counc concern With traffic 1,long both North Dakota Street. and Scho] is 'e P !,an /zone Change regent for the dame property, re;g.0 . A later I g mixture o2 commercial designations apprkt. "i 'w a. ; Thel scu portion '.of the parcel, retained the Profess onal -Conn irci ail 'Plan designei"ions; the eastern porti';yn was designated General 'Cos r�c Ora: w sl ng 0 a� is on was hel�. aid Izo e itid�►nal.: as u he northwest portion was design,rttec for i eighborhood Co 10- 8161 0 18"86)- This neighbors gg, site is curren ":ly untie: a medical, office building and a' fait food ro t &diran ',A � FP R :,PORT C P J�. - � 90 0003/2C 90 +x1i tlR IT �lSx PETRO ,i ril/VNiB li !Ltd ow PARK KATHERK BEARD FACSIMILE TRANSxtiITTAL; NOTIC MES AGI Our facsimile telephone nur al., is r� • r r a r a a♦ y �i + e is i s is advertising ;ar a..es ., n This number is to be businierss transin saio dve r. g p p cue not available for a should you have any difficulties with call • •• • i= e 125 S Box 23397, ori 97223 ( ,) 639 -4 • TRANSMISSION OK TRANSACT I ON # 3675 ► CONNECTION TEL 17434491 CONNECTION ID 03 START TIME 02/12 09;37 USAGE T I ME 14'20 PAGES 22 .16 IL rva The 'City of Ti"gar�d" s . "t oAipreh®nsi�re' Plan inch(1st': three �,�irts' rik part ncludes the indi ideal c� e�he siae plan report (Ca r� eraa •` hand '. Involvement; �la►tu►e as �e 'cures and Open. Space, `' Air1: dater and » Resources; : Ec'onomy; Housing; Public Facilities ;and Servi`cf�s;,..' Transpori ation; Energy and I re boi r ttion. ); which ',c nstitute the ' f ndings; the second part of , the .;plan incl ades.':th+4 suaawary. 'and policy .:cocuaaent fore the findings, ,!o.lices 'and. -iamplemen \cation ''strategies °, arc9 the third' 'part o$'` the plan includes the: Tig*,,i Co llu i ity U veioparnt Code, which' sets "forth, the devolvpment standar;ds., and''outl.ines the ' procellures or obtaining'; �the,r neces = °. ' pment approvals.. . ior�� eVo 1 i � i r e - y The on+ oi.rag program will include the preparation oaf a capital, improvement 'plan isutlirsing the major capital; investments ;needed' to realize full development r the planning area, �rur ding sources and a: budget. POLICIE T1IS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ALL bFUTURE LEGISLATIVE CHANGES;' ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL S ARIIPTED ` BY 'THE " LAND CONSERVATION AND D�rEL:IPMENT CQNII'IISSIOK, `fF;�E REGIONAL �'LAN , PraPTED, BY THE iMETROPOLIT`'AN SERVICE DISTRICT; ANY NEB10IB0RH000 PLANNING, C GA1NI.ZMTIOH PLANS AM IMPLFJMENTA i IOI MEASURES ADOPTED BY. THE CITY OF "TIGARD AFTER THE EFIF'EcTIVE DATE 0' THIS �t,011PREHENSIVE PLAN ARE DESIGNED TO BE CONSISTENT ; WITH TNT PLAN; AND TOE TIGARD C OM I C O MpJN IT IN LOPMENT . 'CODE ARIA cw PREHE�I TO Do THIC5 �: VE PLAN AN0 COMMUNITY � DE�IE y W KENT CURRENT 1�"N THE NEEDS, OF THE ORDER � �> 110, ... UP! 1ED AT LEAST EVERY F t`VE THIS PLAN aNAL�. 8E RE iE.�D AND YEARS. ..: r f .c analjr6 its has a n r c a a to he `� ppl .can, fo r sup rt the ra�+guest�`�' fora change in orning;. the traf`fiic a naiy0114,,,.„00n00 " r'Mthat,, if tom, crane r hang+�'r. is. `approved, the property w��.11 b 3 d lope Oa a :servLce station» , r.- the requested zone change would allow the property to yb3 eve�'1" variety of retail p, :y es. pica lP. retail develo ten ' w ®gad c ene r�t�� averae .e daily . traf f : volum s similar ', to tiose : eported in tai 'traffic analysis 'for .. • ee rice static' . ?awanr, sa r® `'the traffic q;en�s rated idij ring the afternoon , eak'� hou could be much 'reatoi under, 'many of ' !'%'aa °aLlowiiid .uses. s a articular cone at this s ite. currently, t e 'City r is receivinq Traffic i p many doraplainta,, about the volume � of traffic using; SW North.. Dakota Stt ,�tF and "` traveling through the residential areas , to 'avoid . cofg5Pt ion' i ,; Saaholle . ' Pert.'y Road Retail • , coat iwivcial davelo aro : of tlt�� ' : iitn iss likely to , crri sae. Iii' ' increase in traffic Dina North Dakota Street Develop ent s f : a ser41.ce station conlo lead to a greater tra'f�fc'. increase cn North Dakota Street thsn that indicated `:the ',�lgures ,iii the Sf ,c an .lyeias, due to the unique lotas t o the Site. Th re `a att� n® s ti, �sezry .ce.``sta ons Within axe® mile c th+�b . °, e. 3xistin r,$ai3in aaatt ►d existing develo nt , it • a�n .ik ly ,that a� seavieq® s to �ticn ill b 'built , a :t�niaa' one m31a ' o the ` eitaanQ- T ae' efore y , there is a tick that moms traaf a�,ic .144 be dive 4d : fro m ":',0$1010 ron'44 in~� or; ear to utilize the service statLon/cc�a nience ,ashore, ' : ropo ed fog' the site �. Traffic diverted from MU* M. or ? 2.1 t . A nd a woul 4be' l keiy it~o utilize North Dakota Street tee► acres® the site. Therefore, we recommend that the none chan9e be denied until ext:isting traff ' probl ms in the residential arSas of North Dakota Street are resolved. Lgard Planning., De rtpert iniNt. GHAM, / r 'm comprehensive Plan Amendment, t ® ^ha ge the tpr'ofesaienal ..commercial' to C-f General., zoning designation yi oad (WOTM i06iTION ' 12528 Schol .e der Pa#aciiiked -lthe • Si#'. e Plan and 4plica►n ° a stat merit o ypu ,riess nformat on supplied by, various " departm 3flt 5 and agenciee and i'rom other . fo mation� availabl a to :our stn €, rego t and . gec aaend ti0 but be , prejiared! and a decision X3.11. brie renst >r ed on' the' : roposal im the near If y u wish to com sent . on this ap l;il.t�at aai, Facie ne .; 19 Q decd below car at ,ach .a separate; letter to ; cau may u®e the apace ; provnt; 1Qan+� return :,your commented x %t°u ire, �aa�a�a t ®ncd," ny. thve dates p a below with ` your comments ands confirm m your w;' phone t;rae s��a�iE contact r�ot:e�3 � � , _ � s � � s'sible. If you 'have a ay ca a ltiohn regards cr�mmeaate in v�r3.i: tog ;ens o0n as 1 1 5.86 this' 04tttrs laOntLaCt. , the Tigarc Planning Department, PO Bost ..233,97, Hall `EIll�rd., Tigtard, Ok 97223. PH NE 639. 4171. ', STAFF ^Itr , , FOLLC. a! NG ITEMS` WAS PEASE �CHEGY� �.i�E � W® have yeie v®e ro rea have no objections to i a Please contact Please refer tei Pie 0003,o004 l er. FROM: ,Tigard: Planning Deppartr?enit; CPA, 0- 0003/ZON 90-0001 GOWNING Comprehensive ve Plan Amendment to c1> nge `,+ h ►?: "i (Professional Co,mnercial) to C--G ,(General zoning . designatione from C -F to LOCATION:. 12528 SW ;SchcUs Ferry 'Road (MTH. :attached • is the Site Plan ainc app is nt s Y: statement foi', your review. From .information supplied by ;.varioue lepartmenta" and. agent es and '.,from otB er information available to our``' Staff, . a u report and ,recommenda$ ;ion' will be prepared and a decision will be rendered 'on : e,,propOsial the in the inrra future. If you wiebl to comment _ on this application, ' need, your tc j *10 ,,. by. You' may use the apace proved below'' or ,;attach . a" ee a a e lette to return your comments.' 1.1_,..113,1n are tin able to rosrotd bw :the. o e at,�e ■leaso phone the staff . contact noted below w.t your ogml�dt3nts ".and coyif.rdar your comments in writing as soon, as possible. If you have' any questions this matter, contact the Tigard ,Planning' Department, PO: Box 23397', 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, OR. 9722:3. PHONE: X33 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOW3'NG ITAMS THAT APPLY:. We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Prone Number: bkm/CPAOO.03 . HEM FROM Tigardl' anfinag Lepartavaent�,;, C /SP 90- 0003 /ZON 90 -0001 UNNIN 1 prehensives Plan, 1meradmerit, to change the (Professional Commercial) to C -G: (General'C 'zoning ' designation : from C °P • to 10-q. NE:' LOCATION:. 12528 SW °Soho/le . Ferry ,Road (WCTM ec es t hfor approval of ! e nee de �.gg'ati.Of ` "frown + C--g ,mmercial) and to change, +the (ProfeSs►ioIal ` ccnierci l f 1 35i D tax lot 2400) Attache the Site Plan aid p etntement you review. various de .mente , adgenciee and from; of her nfc 6044. iaya euppl.ied by P nformat3.cara ova .lr r�.e o our staf f o • .. report and ° recommendation will be re' .aced” nrad': a decLsion w 11 ;be rendered on the r� :?op sal. in p the near ;future. P P sire need ur eoanmente ° mod 3 1tou , ieji,� to. ,,ao adept oua ' �, ® applic:at�►or ya 1990. .You m�gy use the apace provided below 'or attach , a separate le Ater to . .;,return your aer!t xf t►a'�u ae•.,� to respond they above date please `,._ +Irae tale staff , coal9,.act nnated bela°++`;'�with .your COSanetjte and confirm .your 'co:.%n►entt3 in writing , �s soon a�; tea Tole. , Y£ you have &ty que siorae regarding , �c� acs Plann� n Department, "P0 Boas 23397 a 131251: SW th�.o matter, �cont�.r the 7 3,c� ,�. g Hall 0.1.vd. , Tigardl,' OR' 9 i223. PH0NEs 639 4131' PLEASE CHECF. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT ,gPPLv: xx We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to'. Please contact ,,_„ of ouz office... Fame of Person Commenting: Phone Number: e bkin /CP X90.03.81 Mg T3:gard Planning Department CPA 90- 0e03 /ZON 9O� OOO1 c NINNG r /BP Comprehensive Plan Amendment do orange, ,the, (Profereional : Commercial) to C-G' (General) ,zoning' designation from C rP to; C.-G. ' ZONE: LOCATION: 12528 SW Scholia Forry.It aad . {W i httached, 3.6) the. Site Plan an applicant s statement fir your review. 'rOr' information.' ,supplied byr, 'vari� ®ua depaP arts and ..agenci.ea. 'find from s other information available to our staff , a report and , .recommendation will e'l prepared and a derisi.oil will. be tendered ::on the, proposal .. in they near `future. if you swish to comment` on :this application, 'ire your ' o„ . is by ;,.. r , 19 4. You may use the space provide ( :below .. r attach a; separate letter is � �. return ,your ` Comments . g�, f y ou are enable . saLul. 9 �e ;_above date 'please phone the staff contact zi,notecd below witch ° your ;' comments and 1 confirm .your° comments in writing as ; soon as possible. If you ' .ve any ,questions .regarding this matter, contact the' Tige d Planning Depart►° eje, PO Box 23397, ,,,13/2 W Hall il .'vd. , Tigard, OR 972230, :P8c3 s 6+39. 4171. STAFF C®11 `l` cri a Je,rry Cf f es PLEASE CHECK BE FOLLOWI W ITEM THAT ,APPLY: _, ', We have reviewed, the Proposal and have no objections to it. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comment DATE a Februa 27 , 4990 a CPA 90- os13 /�ZoN _ 90 -®001 CUNNINGHAM/BP A request 'for ` approval' i of Comprehensive Plan ,mendment to change ; the land use, designation. from .0 -P • Professional Commercial) to C-4.4 (General Commercial) , and to change the*, zoning, designation from c -P to c -Gm ZONE: C -P. (Professional Commercial) LOCATION: 12_28 SW scholia Ferry Road (WCTm is1 351D, 'talc° lot 2409 i Attached is the. Site Plan and applicant'S statement for you review. information supplii d by various departments and agencies and , from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on th . proposal in the. near future. is Mar. 9, If you uaish, to comment on thin application, ire �" Y'®� by --- .--- -, 1990. You may use the apace provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are onside c� rye on+ by an+de.c r►f�. m lose phone the staff contact noted below with your comments 1o, comments in writing as soon as poeoible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Departme1t, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,`OR 97223. PHONE! G39- 4171.. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Of fer__ PLEASE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLaf We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our a: Please refer to the encic+Fed letter. (ENE (59RCHILL Deputy Fire Marshall Plain Examiner 503.526 -2502 FAX 523 -25 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION PILE NO: comPREfilENIPIVE, PLAN ,MENDNENT CPA 90- 0003 /ZONE CHANGE ZC 90 -0001 FILE . TITLE: ;C[DNN INGT /SP APPLICANT: BRIAN DUFFY, EP OIL 0W Rs LEE CUNNINGHAM 2863 'PROSPECT DR,, STE. 360 13385 SW 115THSAVE. RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 -6620 TIGARD o OR 97223 BEQUEST: A REQUEST APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE MAE LAND USE DESIGNATION OROM C -P (PROFESSIONAL COR�Y� j T ® C GENERAL C01CIAL j AND TO CLANGE TEE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM -P TO 04. LOCATION: 12528 SW SCROLLS' FERRY ROAD (WCTM 151 35A1) TAX LOT 2400) ZONING DESIGNATION: C..aP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION NPO'NO: { CRAIRPER5ON: JAMES BOYLAN D lPg0NE: 626 -064® A Ga 0? STAFF DECISION °t/ XX PLANNING COMMISSION DATE ggAggag TIME HEARINGS OFFICER DATE / /,.,e TIME XX CITY COUNCIL DATE ' 0 TIME ■• RETURN BY / / XX REQUEST FOR COMMENTS (see a��.tacn®a 1 et) �T ,..._ ATTACHMENTS: Mt VICINS;TY MAP _.. LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRAT.,, �: _ _, ® � T� ARCHITECT URAL FshN VITE PLAN STAFF CONTACT PERSON: JERRY OFFER PREPARE FOR PLANNEr APPROVAL: 38MENTT TIMES g2/_,_„,190 .'OR GONIAN /'..... NOTICE TO PEOPERTY OWNERS TO BE MAILED ,_. /;_/ _ LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION /; /_ 'NOTICE TO DLD - ATTACHMENTS: BP Oil had today filee for, he re oi 'tree refer."'en ce coC`ner f om.. 'ha, erc oral Co e�:ciai, »o 'General Co► erai�al "fie w ish to: develop a se iOEt s tat corner, end also . relocate h �: e � � ,� it e e g Ve i ari n fac li . fio a neww : building on, the southern end of the property. I ;would like to mate myself available to address, your at.: ociaticn on out . proposed plans. With the exception of the week of March 12 1990 ® I am availably to ,' meet with your group, at their convenience. Pleare foal free to call me if you have any questions. Brian Du r. Site Iev'4loper NOT/CH: IF THIS NESSACE IS INTERRUPTED OR RECEIVED !bICOMPLETE, PLEASE CALL: DATE: FROM: �. NUMBER Off' ,� `T�7 COVEn eagE A; ,PHONE #: :' TO REPLY BY FACSIMILE: SENT: 916, --6 31-6988 DATE: '24/ 13:59 RECEPTION' OK TRANSACT I ON # 3443 -NNNECTION TEL 916 631 0733 CONNECTION I Q BP OIL WEST' START TIME 91/24 13.56 USAGE T I 14E 02' 48 ,!AGES 1/2 /90 ).3 :43; 12310 031 0733 113P 0111. Difeeo BP OIL 'EST 444 (1 Y Uk' '1'1(iAttl)''' U4aZ BP Oil Company Pike, sphSso OilvSi6OL C Mil (646) 1331 -0733 J a 11, 24, : 1990 RE: SCHOLLS FERRY & NORM DAKOTA, Mc Dear lir. Offer: BP Oil has (ilea the attached application Lot the rezoning of the ref ' pares from Professional Commercial to General ComMetVial. We Understand that to have an application approved by the City is is necessarY to insure that the proposed artmge is cro sat3ble with Idle City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and those guidelines established by the ^tw sar I hope that this outlier of our develoPment and how it relat4 to the cityt s comprehensive Plan will Provide your Depar ent with the background info ti on you feel necessary. . for our • application. , We feel it is appropriate to reevaluate the current zoning of this parcel mow, . due to the' changes in xesidential and commercial +growth in this urea. There is now a need to reevaluate the currylt plan in light of this grow and f'ut mce Projected growth. We also feel that tb f a change win allow a diversitY of uses in the area and imProve the commercial services available to the Community. However, at the same time snit will be" retaining the Veterinary Cline will be reminding on the site a new oom ia<l history of the corner and also its rimes errant a the f aciiity6 Our 'conforming to th is t & it 's •, roes to es bliSh. tens Ve uses on state' Ratites pr�as il�sae .� l also be e � �' t l With the 'reconstruction of Scho g and al.o►r� oolleotor streets. ]�+�xr;� , by the State; from a two lane to a four we wild be locat 9 g : event tiov ent of traffic in a safe and harmonious dad �, The reconstruction ' '!►f Stholis Ferry will 1 self to the redevelopment of this plata and it also ' p+ the of s application. rezoning of this p e1 and ' t it " s subsequent new constructitni will all an orderly into fit: witb. the new 1 a State Route rather '' to allottr IngolindcomProMiSes of adcesis deign t ...i.s ► g tmatur : e r 0* 9 .1I *1(/24(.,09 13 :46 12916 OS/ 0733 & x' 111. REST' 444 (1 fl Ur 'TibAKV I vvs We also believe that the ,af 'i tmatiVe s pea a epf this appl,icatioz, by the City, will be cons.= with the planning goals of the staite of Oregon,, and thosA eat the Ifetrepolitan Service ict. The developmilet# of an, aUtorsobile servic station, in a General Comerciaa. pred„ is cezapatible with the intent of having auto- oriented is located along Major traf:Eicways such as Scholia Feeyel. OUr application is consistent with the code of the City which al/ ems the consideration tion � of zo?3ing changes when it can shown . that the exist plan .stale t coido the i� to p tapxd growth of an aroma.. rt be shown that the elasting plan did not reserve Suitable a locatio for a. service station to serve the needs of this growing area. There are no properly zoned. Mites along &cholls Ferry, we of Rotate 217 to serve the needs of the growing residential popul atio. However, it eho ld be pointed out, that rezoning this mss: ent1y ommerdially e property will any nonce rcial land from the City ' inv r t adjust the class, f ication of existing commercial property, . w. It is BP oil's intent to have discussions with the local neighborhood associations and to listen to any coneerrol or co about our proposed development It ya our understanding that these discussions have been going ` on, on a preliminary bases, thra the current own' of the property,, for some time nom. { .m it is our .tent, and the requirement of x.11.' p1.i.0 agencies that must review our plans, th t our development plans will cOmply with the. e. a P licle Fedl , State and Regional Water Quality StandardS. We plan for Our facility to be lath an attractive and a.edthetice .ova to this ial area. The placement addition r s. • s and wash facility ;will be Oriento so of our ga�oc��.,��e p .. w „ ,_ . residential ... j. ��'' from the r . . . as to �x � noise and. �.ght�g a� parcels tr.� our lest propels line. Yard lights are designed to be down lieihtinq and will dot flood tblo adiaird4iti pads. 211 q ci en es Will be t cted alo ' the sidenti al • zo1 Q1 V V. „k,� y d the to eight +s f 6' cou.1.d. go toy i p : 3 ate .. n s .ol sh P � and one city. �d�► wa,7L"� have only one dries y` o .. . e .h ac .. . oa of the Pip � �' will, on �a�ota a =�ntxre frost landscaped as Well as t for pr®pety Vileil os�ter ian Za,ciity Will be reloo .ted to► the s at : po ,±i� .' t of a pr , :, ► y' and Will be Orien : ' ... . Da)cota, • 01/24/19;0, 13:47 15'616 6p1 0733 BP OIL W ein 404 c:a�a'� r r glAntlW 161 1)1F4 It is BP intent . to bring a service to this `'rea that does not currently waist for the local resiaants. We will provide between, 12 -15 mil and par, time positions normally y ' filled by local idents r This development will utilizes ,mot ng csoannercially zoned property'. Our regal for rezoning will eliminate , el imi to tie need to locate an alternative l Scholls Ferry, that lea sr remelt • c �e��t • ' the of a non coaaaercial property into a cconsaircial designation During our planned meetings, with the neighbors, We will listen suggestions o', fencing and esti�►ns on what type nand, d laa c°p in g �� their 0 @4tl6g'9hey . would like see al.ong our creJiY{81L= . property lira=s Our planned development will take advantage of the proposed improvementis to Scholls Fe a planned by the highway department. Al other public services that would be needed are already ha the ate.. All design work on utilities will be to City standart70. It is e p v n that intense traffic ic uses, such as our proposed va be located alma 5 o & collector streets. I believe treat. this intersection meets those criterias. All of our off site work, such as curbs, sidewalks, d to City and State standards. driveways, will be constructed site e i e e its .. The site will contain sufficient pa ka�ng ° for its use and will an : �aappe4 parking spaces azd these contain the appropriate � . will be located as close to tbe b a,ild ,gs as poseible. employees, Those need to use public transportation, '' have ll ve a access to public tra po tion, if it exists now o74 is planned for the near tuturek , from Scholls i� o Under the definition of rases in a General Cenreterkeial zone. I description of es that euld ha s permitted in that zone. believe that we meet the d� d t s.e is such : that we will sere varied trade area from a site Suitable in size to be ► perly ,',. There is no similar `case functional. and �� e in the o�d.�. e�� .. we are no aced by residenti il. uses cx tore than tato eldest. our locating oit Sr .oW. ratty as' ' ' tits for Tat" the ekrepteed read im zove rents 'Will, oerre t e + stn. 1� ~ scamo .. and pub`i .. rtatio v: a on. tWe t or a and ctlsct4t s - et orete a site with laietle ' ` :1Lit `« .0. In EnzikerY, I believe that mar ap$ is tion, . f pp reivel c ] i y, wall met all of a quidat1� n and requirements o` r .r�,�aSilr� �d� , Plan. our use 1st appropriate 2or the .*ationP will meat &la applicable Plan pa ?liciea and that: scale is .appropriate kor i the : ac ea eild will have ' no negative impact on the s u- -fac t c et slratem gime the rajority of ,ou traffic io dream to= existing traffic pattern. eas Brian 'p., Duffy nior Sitti DeVeloper ' 01/24/90 13:45 OP 'OIL' 9116 631 0733 PP OIL WEST -.44 CI Y,OF TIGARD '12 002 BP Oil Company 2866 PPb$ ett Park Drive, Suite 360 Ranerlo Cor ovs. CalifomLL 65670-3020, MIS) 62 -0733 ZranuarY 24, 1990 RE: SCUOL+S FERRY NORTH DAKOTA, SWc Dear Mr. Offer: BP Oil has filed the attached application for the rezoning of the referenced parcel from Prof e,asivn, ri :loran ercial to General Co nDierCial M T'ie ande+rstand that to have an application apPvoved by City necessary to insure that the proposed change is compatible with ' � • P the City s Comprehensive Land Use Plan a�± those guidelines ostablS Acad by the State. I hope that this outline of our development and how it relate to the City's Comprehensive Plan will provide Your Department with the background information you feel necessary for our app'! ication i f'aQl it ins appropriate to ree ra .uate the cur Bent zoning of this parcel now, due to the changes in residential and commercial this area. There is now a need to 'r+aevaluete the �u current plan in ' p light of this growth and future projected growth. We also fe+al that this change will allow a diversity of uses in the are °1 and improv a the coum(trccial services available � o the community. Bow.e:Ver at the s n �' � � .�]111�! time �� will be retaining the 0 commercial histo ry of the cortxe2' and also its.. prime tenant, the VeterinarY a Clinic, will ba. remaining on th* site in a near Our proposed use will al:ao be 'conforming to the State & City's guidelines to establish ihtEhs'ilte uses on State Routes and along collector streets. TnT$th the reconstruction of SOholls Ferry, by the State, from Fa two lane to a four lane road, in ,1990 or 1991, we will be loaAtwing on a state route engineered for efficient movement of traffic in a safe and harmonious manner. The reconstruction of `Scholls Ferry win lend itself to th the r+edevel:opMe nt: of this of �n � s a. ��: ` parcel and it alto a�uppaart th�e ' timeliness pp ication; The rezo n pare d �' �f this` and its subseclueilt new construction will allo+,tr ati or`v., er1y int egratir with the cneii lr larger s . -. � than � trying � �� rr�m�se� f ra�he unsound w design p+ access deter to ser'ars.oe the eusting trrxctures: '.01/24f90 13:46 *916 631 0733 • BF OIL WEST 444 CITY OF TIGARD 11003 e� l • affirmative nsu *, of this w� also b� �.a�re that the a�f�. PP application, by the Ci. _ will be , .,� with the planning nals of the State of Oregon, on a�.nd those f the etropo1 itan goals � O of automobile Service District. The deve:L�►pmen.�t ref an s � ge.rVica station, in a General CI mmercia,l zorie, is compatible with : kle intent of having auto - oriented uses located along maj or t ra.ffioways P,Uch as Sc oils Fly Our applifcation in consistent wit witll ti code of the City which allows the consideration of zoning changes when it can be shown that the existing plan mistakenly did not consider the future & rapid growth of an area. It I `; be shown that the existing plan service r tio to not suitable for a lo��:�.�onas e. �sta n did the rid of this growing area. There are no properly serve ute 217 to serve the zoned situ along Scholls �'ert-�' west of �, c needs of the growing residential population. However, it should be pointed uµ st, that rezoning this is currently commercially zone p roperty will not remove an y non-commercial land from.. the City. inventory, but rather adjust the classification of existing oommurcial prop .:f It is BP Oil's intent tc Nave discussions with the local neighborhood associations and to listen to any concerns or Comffients about o:r pz oposed development. It it our understanding' th&t these d rse ions have been going one do a • elimin r bases, thru the current owner of the property, for some time now It is our intent, and also the requirement of all publLii" agencies that must review our plans, that our development plans will comply with the applicable Federal, State and Regional water Quality Stsndar g zt to both aesthetic tial and cammercia We plan for our f a�..�.1 .y cave and ae o this residential. � .. m area. The , placement addition t . of our gasoline pumps and wash facility will be oriented so any n ential . r ,,�,,�.a. and lighting away from to s to our. west rr line. Yard 1 .gh a are designed to Parcels be darn lighting and. w� Lii not flood the adjoining f � oining parCels, All i ♦ t '� _ M... l zone required , fences will b« constructed along ; tics residential • a um height and if permitted by the of 6 and, could go o iB c fty. We will l have srLy ©-d driveway on Scholia ls r et. Ty and nd AM e an Dakota. The entiro fr � e of the propert y 141.11 be landscaped as well The • d " will be relocated to :the southern portion • »i�ai��r�a�xY facility of -Ma property and will be ori+t tted towatds N, Dakota. Id I•91/24/90 13 :47 12016 631 0733 • BP OIL WEST -444 Crry OF TIGARD !1004 It is BP Oil's intent. to brig a servic to this area that does not current -1Y exit for the local residents. We will Provide battle-en 12 -15 full and Part time positicins, normally filled by local residents. This development will utilize existing commercially zoned property. Our retest for rezoning will eliminate the need to locate an alternative' _ location, along Scholls Ferry, that may into a commercial designation- During n co�aerci .�. a n ur recquest the rezoning of a non , our planned meeting t4, with the neighbors, we will listen to their suggestions on what type and demIgn of fencing and landscaping they would like to see along our common property lines. Our planned deve3.opmeant will take advantage of the proposed improvements to Scholls Perry, planned by the highway y ueparLment. All othar public services that would be needed are already in the area. All design wo rk on utilities will be ,a City standards. It uses, is in the City 's C !mprehe� ssiv' Plan . that intense traffic uh as oor proposed r1an, be located along major & collector street, believe that this intersection meets those triter as. All of our off site work, such as curbs, sidewalks, will driveways, w ` be constructed to City and State standards. driveways, parking The site wild. contain suffi.cent a�k� , for its �,o and will i conta the a ro p riate handica ed g spaces and these P.� p � pax s Parking 1/ill be locaia�d as close to the �.�oui�.dirg as Possible. Those employees, who need to use pu' lic transportation, Will h 3 P c as Y �coas. o Public s�a. on, if it nOw or is planned for the near future ro: Scholls lverry Under the definition of 115es in a General eric mercial zone I belie . e that w e . meet the descr iption of uses that Should. be - Our scale is snob. that w= �� a.i.l serve uu varied trade area from a site suitable a n size ::.tea in that zo�e� e to be properly '3 functional and Apart future grcwt There is no similar ^use: dential in the immediate area and we are not surrounded pry residential uses or more than two Sides. Our tin is the e r � �� proper site for our u�a and the lroa osfei rod improvements will correct the existin traffic congestion and public transportatir n is available to the. area. The locating on this ' ',1a or art + and collector st: eet will create a site with hzgb eaic% Current Current Lc cat:I.on Acreage. Does th a'n Des or Resident/4 ang ensi'ty' in Unit Per urren., Dens ity': tack ' T!liree Department of Lard Coner 1175 Curt Street,' ''.N'. E. Salem, Oregon 97 10 -0590 NOTE: I f more copies of this foicm office at 3711 -0050, -;or thaws form' may her u lira' Please be advised that. st�t�uf e.s r�ui a ;they= 'ite rovided. A 'general descripLion bt the intends suf fi.cien /�:,A Pi oposed plan and lamed ; �t'se regr�iati sent to Di CD at least 45 days prior to (See OAR 660-18-020). .Ba9tch,gi ound This report will. supplement the application mate rai r .sutn tou BP Oil Company ,and t e traffic analysis prepared Chard 40e1 oei PE, of AT1EP, Inc. It . will augment the material kdeaa`ing piroposai's relationship with''khe Tigard CQmprehensiVe Plan. BP : Oil haot subriiitted a rezone pet tion from Professional Co' to General Commercial for the purposwe �: f constructir� w station �vith' a small minis -mart 'nd a car t'xash. 'This Bevel' pine will retain tine existing' vet r nary clinic on the as ;te;.t station wwill `featu °e extensive lai dscap .ng as well as fer ci' l uses . ci�n .ia borin r Aes�. t ICCE#Ss: the prop'erty outh Dakota '£treet,,, Dakota is a. collector 'i� ;oaf "Schol i err! •chol is Ferry Road nclpcie reel a.tme 1 Transportation �.s' 6 Year H Ighwa. ImprovEtmet�t Frogr'�� w r v it,' is' anticipated rthis work W a from tyro to .you lanes :. completed +ukithino the next two. yeai)re h The 'redevelopment, of the subject property "wi 111 at3J1:a, the Scholls Ferry pr j ect . etbad; 1 be coordinates ' tai th the State and ; ;thy reet . This will help relieve curren an This action will help y needs of the sUrre)t.inc:iihg these uses not being .alIowed Professional Commercial zone,, '0000, ts .. T to provid s�; r s within Thy; BP Oil' intended proposal° is to meet `the same neighborhood day; to -day nee dQ as the' uses ,typically allowed with tJhe . f "�1ei orhbot Commerc 4 al zone. H cUev er he � g ordinance I , virtue excluding service stations ini neighbor hod co ercial •zones doss •Ir ,i # 1 V "Ili n /I' i h�: not ai��.ow� thi. , ' ' � �., � s" I'to occur : s we the • ' ' 1 i , .�eani,�g map � b�,�not ��'i��v��i;ng'� enough�appropriatel�y onc1d ,land; too m e� , k this to occur. The service= t; ,,. , , s at itn tu. products, as well as` automobile .sery 'convenience to the ;area resi,'de , limiter, groceries wF hiln eas walk' yg d1is r rro s too at ' 'L , 4• amiss . _ 0 s • ,31J 112 -E- 3200 ILLY 'w6 ns g 9900 g s, 155 r 9500 " 154 1< ., !1400 170dy 118.8» • 11500......40%. rz :t P tT1AL,.r'Ta ct_ �SOO. 't - 1a5E10M 6 -� 107.45 12200 Ar4'rON DR'. r:,ftt r r,:r �V i °rJ rr Lr rrr �!r ai 4,121- v:0 44 -1 Fria 4 . Wi.254 pri,ci. uce7e tv-t- doct.21-\ -1-0 Roprsr,0 Fp1>cy ter. ?idd i 4-iavi GKisl-iiJ hruse,L., sk, trt 14 '`` s. of March ,7,4 1990 Jerry Ofger Tigard Plantting Depoirti;ient P. Zox 22297 tisar(1, OR 97223' : CPA 90-0003/VAR 90-0001 CUNNINGEIA14/13P Tax Lc iza 2400; Map 1.81-35AD Dear Jerry; Tile 01,tiias of Tigard and Zeaverton have worked hard at liirti.tin tstail commercial developpicsilt along S.W1. '..icholls Ferry Itoild, It J.8 recognized that ,. coriuliercial devel.opment is necessary. Hower, it can hswe detrimental Impacts on gibutti..ng resideti.ti.e1 properties," as well al adjacent EiLro( tn. . Of particular cantle= wi.tti regard to this reqi.test„ iR that: o aci.ttii..ional access , , points onto Sclic)1.1.s Ferr:,:* Road. , The city would not object, providead ac:.cesa was limited. to S.W. North Dakota. Secondly, in reviewing ,tilts 'application, the traffic ana1ysi.0 onl.y evaluated the propOsed t,tte by B.F. Oil., arid not other rei.ail ties that cotlii be allowed Under the zoriing, ' Other uses oi..11d have tsVon greater impacts. Sitol.tld the ,requelit be approved o develot)rnottt sktOt.114ti ilectIssitai.* the ded.l.catiori for Sch01.12 Ferry Road. Fdrthermo 0. vo- devoloPment sihold be condiriortc4 to 8 idle): COTIStrUCL; the Schol.3i Ferry frontage, or provide cash-in-l.iou of' ac,tkial. im9r°vciftentfi., If you have any qUestionsi please fool free to contatt me at 526-2424. , . sinoorolY, 1 , James N.F. lierLdrYlt Priricipal Plattner F-3.842 AF1 Z9 1990 b 47tg R '1 OR 97076 Ceenerai linfarinatiOnt,(503)52 42222', 4/5 SW, Griffith rVe, . a oavei 0 .iivisonsolmillmelmilowirimmiimieb.....lar left rnp ef ,71 ZIO/ZO'd 90O' OT:"2.T 061 6z JeN • h • *ROM: Tigard Planning Department cdtPrkorgi4;) 1`.:0' 'C=4" (Cieeririk zoning designation from to LOCATION: 1252p sit' Scholia' Ferri, Road (WCTM Attached is the Site Plan and applicant statezOnt;, for your review. Prom information supplied by various departnieni:a and agencies and from ,other', information available to our 'staff: ;01),ort` and recommancketiOn will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the ,near' future. ' If you wish to comment on this application, we need your: comireclits by .111.4.10.■•■•••■■••••01/ .1922. , You may use the space provided ,below or attach, a separate letter to retuicn your cOmmentei you are unable to-,_1p9wilajiy...11te above date,,-please phone the staff contact .'aoted below With your COMMellii and confirm your comments in writing as so • tie m ' .t 41, ..,14. , PHONE: '' ''' '. '43 9".11171 I • ./ liASall1 CONTACT: . 1 .. ., . PLEAS E, CNECK TI FOLLOWING ,ITENS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proppalt7.'..“,14 hi5 no objections to Pieaata, contact , OfftCi'' 'Please refer to the eifiCia9edletter.,'. south 1.1LIS Oti ,erist f‘° Jest 0,-teve\ict.V.e, AP‘P`I COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DES3EGNATION I,D% SS -t,thx, P Alt ' ' Soecial ;';height Ymits fla g lo. Density !calculation Landscap n421 minimum % of lot area treet 'Trees &if fer Areas Parkins Areas' Visual clearance Signs _.., ----, OTHER OONSIDERAT IONS (See application checklist for spec Sensitive lands.: •floodplain dra' nag0Wal►. Wetlands Open space Historic overlay ° h, Street impr eeerents /eofnections,lii Ceways R lht-of -•Way dedication, Sanitary Sewer improvement Other agency permits 1! i A`. 'P ROSE o URE Administrative staff review Public Nearing /Hearings Officer .--- -= ng Commission Public Hearn /'Plannt � - The Administrative 'decision o ' ublic earr hak L, p:cu ' ap il'i;cation is f;thd A aRProx imate lY 30 day 4 after a cols p lete 40 --day appeal period foflo;as all decisions -: OO22P ., 05i� P / ) It It a° mir • • 51 ;iirrg A.. S.M. 810111 1411 -a WA imwrimi NetiOninikri MB aimpi 111111 !II 1 • RESIDENTIAL. LOW DENSITY. MEDIUM DENSITY..... MEDIUM ° HIGH DENSITY. HIGH DENSITY COMMERCIAL C -N C- P. 1-- 5 UNITS /ACRE 6 -12 UNITS /ACRE 13 - 25 UNITS /ACRE 25 -40+ UNIT'S /ACRE NEGHBORHOOD COMMER( GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICE .CENTRAL BUSINESS DIS A('M L ATl.i., fjV -CT A '.ITAT:ON * ;^f•n T'� 4 Ti 1'" ' SW TC L' ...UM, d: 91lMCIR Si wr CMt ±' fiP' 4 EIRii+fi tit c --t IAIRNo, .., A, i Li . y `+ Mi ba i i ■ ' it M. MART 0,000411413„ E;: E4EH•tiA r SCHOOL AI.KLw 3+.► `APPLICANT PROPERTY Y LOCAiItyN Address 500 L ©EsCAIPTXO VNE . , • PitOP(�*SA CE��ARY :APPL:IVATI41m.1 • 1 j Ex' sting Co «w�in�t C. Ii 1 p Adjacent Property, nrorth�.V^t?- �CCp`�'1a:.� south vtteta r 4" west COMPREHENSIVE , PLAN DESIGNATION ZONING DESIGNATION 000E REQ Il2E1EN S Minir�uen lot size /Wl • pecial setbacks: streets iestab lower I r�teris tit 'zones :::.. u4 t.la'i flag, lots �` accessory stru turves . Spec.ial, height lit Oens,it; calculation Density transition Landscaping minimum' I. ; of lot area Street. Trees (41 Buffer area.,`; �� C city/106, r Aion Parking; and loading uc�. . Pa _Etirtr� OTHER CONSIDERATIONS (See applicati!� n ,checklist " for speci'f is • items) 'Sensitive lands: • f loo6,plain � rainage say )25% slope...-7— 0v) ' approx 3- f ► . , cAiof/ Wetlands _ :�,�:- ..L.- =-,. -� ,` '' � lZ � • s�a��rds of iA avermeipto yb •.; fie, . r' 41 ;aa� Open space ''�."" or ;fie .•i �' ;1,'e 4 IN? 0"ouewrIt�s' W� "i•ricr, — � 'Al, :it Historic overlay p o ve108 e Strreet improvements m eti ibt �7 i.►�` 4K aN Right -of -ways dedication i, t'`� Sanitary Sewer' improvement NA' . . Cd. � 1".1 Fi7 Storm Sewer improvements /, ,,. 11 'TO �' y� LI O Improvement Agreement -- Perit; Bo Fees 10. 'PROCEDURE • Administrative staff reveea,�;; Public liearirig /Nearinags Officer Public peava ng /Planning .Oommisiofl The e± c Administrativ � ecisiorr or Pu lio• HHearing a rox imate l-, 30 da s after • �a ct mplete apr.'a� Cation • pp »Z ay . ppeal period' f iilows all decisior*s;:l' (b73P / .: rOO22P) 500 .2000 4.50 t i 2900 0 116.12 30i00 1111,.65 0 4'3100 °. 111.97 C� .3300 -'7„! 7a 108:42 � .. gb 3400 'o 500 .'' , in "? 510100 57 �1 ' 10.37 114.3'; 10000 11Zzio I`-- n 155 on 9800 154 ... 9700 •St 153 % 112,00 ' ° 168 �) 112;6' 11300 169 1-41— 04......112.76 11 400 170 11500 ,ii COOE REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size fwit: . Sett. ►cks (Pont toner." Special ,setts; cks stOwe�ets lower bratens,i.tJ Z3i flag; lit accessory 's,'trc k imum la cr!►verage scapirtg minimum ;X of lot are treet Trees ,.r6 ing Areas • isual. clearance grog . and load ling; Signs •,:....�,r.....,.�., r_--- OTHER CONSIDERATIONS (See applicatiqin `.checklist for specific items) Sensitive lands: •f *odp�lain � dr thagesay Si a2 'sloe e Wetlar►iis Open space .._,_. Historic overlay,,,_, ...� Street icnprovements/corar ct1ca�s/bikeways ,.:. .. .... ... stir Im aroAveme.,nt Agreement - 'Perriit; Bonds; Fees Other agency permits 1Q 'PRGCEOURE AdminiArat live Pub lc Hearing /Hearings O f icer r aLV!,"T',ruw • • r-ublic 4►earing /Planning Cosr�ission �.._.N.. 1dm nistrrat ve decision occur . • roxirotely 3t�+ d . after a dtompleti' appli anon ° is fled' A. r 4 a appz al period follows ,alb 1ecasion . :, 1422' ,ATM 14500 _e 26 tut)._ 14600 e 27 = 14700 28 14E300 eo 14900 30 1500 tee. 51 120.66 15500 36 11779 15400 35 1/4 COR • UNITY DEVELp Epi PPLICATZ CHEC The, items on the checklist below are ,,re Your application subirlission requiresients�..; required . to be si knitted with your� ppl i`icei and . subaai tted with ° all other maveriais application,. See your, application ¢or 'Mart, call P1anrrig at 639 -411. '` BASIC htiATERIAL3 A Application fo,rmi`` (1 copy g) ewreer' s „signature/written aW C) ; "itle transfers instrument D) ;Assessor's map .' a `, ‘! , E) 1Plof or to plan � F') Applicant' 's s tac emeni (G) List of pr0perty otrners & addresses within 250 feet (H) 'Filing fee ($sa:e, ,4,e deli,�" RIME i r- the. successful `completion of I'has` ,'checklist identifies what iron �'h s' sheet' il1ST ' be' 'brought at ' "the, time 'you s'�ubrni.t your er explanation of these ',items or rtatlon SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site armation showirsl b(No,' ,of copies �.A)y 1) Vicinity Map, �x 2) Site size & dimensions. 3)) Contour lines (2 ft at 0=10 or'S 'ft for ' grades 4) Drai � u ca�ursQS and ponds 5) Locations of na�t • na j`Q patterns., , a�IpLa<in aromas s �indludi�a a) a saran 'natural hatzaaa� b) I Sloes ini,exOnss of 23% c) Unstable ground d) Areas with 'nigh seaiOnal water, table !) Areas with 'sovere soil.' erasion 'potential f) Areas having sev► rarely °'weak foundation ,sons 6) Location of resource areas ad shown on :the Coaprehensive Ea Map ` inventory including: a)lildlif 'habitats': b) Wetlands Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings b) Tr— 'Is with 6" + call per �aeas� red 4 fQet from ground level 8) Location of ,existing ;structures and 'their uses 9) Location and ;type of on 'and off -site .miss , !Marcos 10) Location of existing utilities and easements. l) Location of existing dedicated {right- f-�iays Site DeVeloaaaentPlan show�inq (N . of copaia'�a� 1) The proposed site, and surrou! s ing pi ope jQ 2)` Contour Line ante ^va13 3) The location, ` d �i e��s x ins `and names of all . APPLIC,ATIORt CUECRLt a Existing & platted streets f, other pu c wa,�, and easements on the site, and on adJoini� rtiperti+�s IL ]' C] If ]` • P. Ise stree easemen on thei site• slteruatiue routes of dead end''or pro 'esed streets °.that' ;r..e a re future extension z`` The`, iocation and dimens on of a). Entrances, and exit ion the site ' �`' b) Parking and circuLataen c) loading and services .areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e): Outdoer• common areas, ,L f) Above ground utilities ,, 5) The location, ° dimensions & setback distances` of ai a) Existing per uml,eft structure *,:.,improvements utilities and easements which are located'.;on the site and on ` iddjacent property within '25 feet of the site b). Proposed .structures, imprpvements,,' • Utilities and'`easements cn the site 6) Storm drainage facilit3as analey 7 ) Sanitary ,sewers facilities 8) The location :, f areas to :ae landscaped 9) The location knci type o'F outdoor lighting cons ida>>;lirg crime prevention .techniques 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all 2tructures and their orientation 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C) Gradirgl ,P (No. of Of itopies. The site dovRlopsrwnt plan sha►11,�inclodo a grading 'plan a the same scalp as the site au ��,y?ais dra Wings, and ,Shall contain the following information 1) The location and '.extant to which grading will «tetra place I: Citing general contour l' ies slope ratios' and soil stabilization pr posa s� and tzlaa: of year: it is proposed to .be dcnQ,. 2) A statement fr%' a reinter° 'e9Ln4)er� supported by data factuaaY. s�ubstant3aatir�g: a) .'Subsurface°°' explore cO0 .arid; 9eotech'fica . eNineer " re rt b) The: eal idityt of s ora jdrai age .uervi.ce psi oposals c) That ati, l pro ,lens :0411 be mitigated and how they wi 11 be •, mitigate cC D) Architectural' Orarw:n�, s rra. of copies :,, ,' The site cyeve lOpmert plan proposal rhhl inc ude l CO 1 01aor• plans ,t icating the squ re foots je of al'j structures proposed s�or use or -site; aid 2) Typioal clevation drawings of each 'strructUra. C Landscape an (No. of copies The i.dndscape plan shall. be drawn at the same ' scale . of the site analysis plan ors ,r Xarger' Scale if I/etas3ar p and shall indicate 1) pes:rxption of the irrigation system where applicable 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and , :screening s '( , APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Pa« e Location, : "typ ,, sizeA3ar species °'of a eis ng' =an.�j proposed: plants materials r, o- f , x 4 �'t , 4 r :e.. land.:*000'..,,f0 lan? shal'1 includ �f. narrative ,which nazi 1) Soil' con�,itions. ros'ion ° coontrol `" measu S ic1n Ora+w,�, Sign drawi:no �s ,shall be s�abmitter 'i;n accou'dance 'with C, .8.114 •(,:if the',.. ode: as' part of ",a te` Oeve'�`opaent wite've etatr, -to obta nni:g'. a' �u ld ir�g ''Perini t anstroct raffie �neratL'on 'estimate frolimina: partition ':or ,lot; l °ine aa>r'htn►e'a (No. • of ,Copies ,,;) : 1 �'' , ' ` 1) The owner of the subj ect pare The owiner' s authorized ' a ent ` `' . � 'nr, %r te e snap kale ) , .inch ,Mort! rrow and ,dlite, Description of parcel locat ions and boundarie ovation,; °wi(lth and " na' as. ;of streets, o0sit other public ,:ways within' and, adjacent to':-..* c,A :'par ,eL ' ,ocait'ion of all. rmane! t ;' buildings . on :and its` " 25 feat' of sill propQrty °linos w " R r_ 7) Location aM wadt:� of alc11$ water courses 8) Location of= acny trees t:+.6`,' 'ar .greater caliper 4 feet .above , groun leve 9 All slopes ater than 25% 10) L caitio�l of ,a cisting utilities and;; util3,ty oasai a is 11 For ►mot or land "` ) � } p��titon �^iich cr�tatQa� a.publc sft�ee a►) proposed right -ofi way location and . dth'r bj A scaled croE — SaCticn of the proposed. ' tree plus any roses is strip 12) An$�t applioaale. deed rastr` ctio►�s 13,) Evide t *e that lac partition w'x11 .not pr elude , efficient future `lar�1 division whornr 'appiic�ul�►lia , I) Subdivision Praliminrir�c Piat� b and;,,d to how Copies 1) Scale equaling 3O 50, too or. 200 f het to .tie h and liaitad to anQ phase pew 7shoet 2) The proposed oanie of the subd ivi s i'on 3) Vicinity snap showing° prop+ sty i''k eael �tir�n�hi�i>i `ta arterial geld .collec1tur streets 4) developer, engineer, 'survejler, dc'ai* 3ner,, as stppl` lila 5) crate of application 6) goundrary lines oaf tracit tb be su ivid4d Dames or adjacent au(bd iv i s ion or roes of ; recorde+ owners of ad,joinang parcels of nsU$ d ivided land'. 8) Contour lines `related '; to a City- -gstab i�shed Winch -» ii mark at 2 —foot intee^cals for`► -=1 "1 grades ' greistr • than ib'1G APPLLCt TI0 CHECA1XST Page follc pin 10 'a subdiwia`,�i n`) Publ i,c', and, pi7i„v Public and : priu. Domestic water ;ma ins',includireg .f ir•e" hydr tts s, Major power t,,elephan . trasmi#� ion lines `'ry , ne (50,000 v(3lts ors greatfa ,) `e) Wlatercaurses „I �'1 a` saeed reertntei o; n d nother' la` s r nI I N cfoa` mrr b° . M Ipr19 ara nr c storm, sewers w h es,- « kJ r es "s. 31 t + ..:,*Az P. t n o A ayi s nc ss4 ae m,4. i • a1ernppr cx iva ,R lan raf t ro • 11 Plan of the water d ion tdhy} t w'' 'aayn'd s 1:A showing p "ipe sizes 'and .the ,lot at- on of valves •'ark t I fire hydra'nts. r r Approximate .centerline 'rofilles hopi ng the finished grade: of all street's'4'' :1 i�rig street a tonsior4s for`,a reasonable distance beyar�d 'the limits) f Ithe iiroposed subdivi's�ion. A 13 iScaled c►sss sections , of proposed suet right— of- wtay;:l ti 4) 'he " '�locat Joni: of all'` "cress subject d: o `.inundation or stow water evert low �.� , tion off �5) Cocattion, �=sl1l,o th , sated .�# f rec curses .and . ;draina�g waits `� 16) The proposed lot, configura tions, atpprox mate'!clot„ lusts are a Mena ons and, lot nua r used for purpos es ott eh-4 r'asdanti l,, it ts indica►ted upon o' b1e 1 be :such. ,lots I 17) The location. of all 'trees wi ai►atar 6 inches or ,greater, moasur'� at' 4 fleet :Above gr it ' letol; and the location of prSpatre nfg: atuheX Ttyl ;existing uses ophe'- .rscludi e ` f location' of all sir c1 ur*s= ',ate .tie ;;pesant' vacs_ 'of the structures, and a ''i.'s!tateaent of :wtiict� structures are to resin after 'p1 tting 19) Suppleiental information including" a) Proposed deed r�kstrictions! (if any.) rt ” b) Proof of pr�opQ Y� awrder :hip ' c) A PPps ed P lan for P r ovision of subiv ision improvements 20) Existing natural features n clue ine :rock' croppings, wetlands 000', r*W areas*. .211 If ai01#1,0f1 the tdeegoing 'information' cannot 'practicably be .shown • on the preliminary fiplaat, it shall 1 incor *porated into a narrative and aubaai;tted with the application° er Information PREPARED SOCIATED TRANSPORTATION E , �IC� I RiRIC 4040 ►LIIGI WAY LA►% OSWEGO► OREGON 970 E 3 l �h, 1pt�:' ti ti ti RANSPO(RTATION ANALYSIS OF BP OIL .CO N itifED 1 , I. N TIGARD, ORES , This , Impact ana sis has been conducted to P IY .. the existing enbfy and evaluate the g and future of Ti ard's' n I needs i e.� tt oa <:..: traffic era g transportation s stem based on ` Idle potential i i •,' rroundin street stem. The 1.38 acre site impact of �.�e BP Oil company property one the .surrounding, g � system. is bounded on the north by S\o Scholls Ferry Road,on the east by N.Oakota Street and on the west and south the site is bounded by residential development• Figure 1 shows the vicinity map of the proposed development. The theme of the transportation analysis is to assess the transportation impacts from the development of the subject property on the surrounding street network based on two different scenarios: First, the impact of development of the property under existing conditicms wili be established; Second, the, impact of development of the property with the proposed development wi be analyzed to determine what difference there may transportation y IQ. on the tra p rtatiQn `system. The format used in this re po rt was established during g meeting s with th the City of Tigard, 000T and tha applicants representatives. Specific traffic related issasi discussed in this! report include: Traffic analysis for the study area. Existing !and use and traffic conditions in the project area: ■. .I i• i project I/ f % land use ar�d future traffic eQndi�tioras an e i area,:,. Trip Generation estimates for the BP Oil Company property. • Site access locations and operations. Safety considerations at the site access " g bait not limited to slji t distance Mons incuudi n analysis, sass tum lane and charcnelization needs. • Traffic impacts on surrounding streets. s rtanwn data available frp This report was prepared z«4 Ong the latest i r�d rse and trap po .� er applicant, the City of Tigard (hereafter referrer to as City), Metropolitan Service Distract (METRO), and Oregon pa rr� Transportation .. ton nd the Or on Department rtent of � r ports (0D�T): OCIAT �i5PORTATION ENCI EERING A, "AII*IING (ATEP) PACT 1 .��*■ ' fve ' riod L . rn g , n n to : r ♦ r : } : { r 1►�o in and ,��• + i pea ,peA1 �'►}A ri +.... �. ��. �. .....,._...............,,.��.•: J' ,.wG:riir r.::.... :..h_.6.� .,.__...� �o�� /- �C��t t�„Yal.�� ere nts. 'f. :• }::::+}•l.•'ri:' : :• : > •: :prors eercty b• intersections act aceist i i ! o v{'vi'r:•vt.• :.{ :•r. {: :,.. : { p and .aPoini ' ey arter�rals in the area r ,: : ODOT f r the' Scholls .Hwy widening p�r�o�eict. �� age rrmarning peak hour was found to 8::3 0 a:m and. tht e evenin g pe ak huur was from `4:3O o 5:30 p.m: ` U!oon reiiew of these how counts, thefp•m. peak period was deten ined to be the most c itical itspne in -ter .m`I s traffic im a the int ,tions in the stud'area r y' The Operating characteristics : at each of the key sognalized a�rad unsigna0ized`' intersections durin the peak period' were examined using the methods outliner) irk: the t 985 fli�;hw v Capacity Manual util zir the 1-iighwdly Capacity Manual) iitware. The operating . characteristics �xmined included the average vehicle deia�y, volume.,to capacity, (v /c? tio, level.of service; and esitimated queue' length. ite criteria used for the irrOrsection an &psis included tlhe gukke ies sett . th by Washingt ©n Wirty. These gi"iddines state that eachi signalize! into.��rsecriion analyzed should operate .at as Level of Service (LOS) a with a volume to ca as (v /cl .ratio of 695 or :less. See tables 1. through 4. A.IZA)PAPTIOi■iS Site Access Points Access paints for the BP tai! Company site under a cistint; and proposed zoning direr such that traffic r satternsy will not be .vet. - much alike. Under existing onin a oily one access point exist • point • i sts along SW 50V Is Ferry along w.l�alota Street, and mess no nt e.�m clJnder the proposla zoning a slew access hal: lix..en assumed to b ,looted on ' Ferry Road approximately 240 feet west of N.[ akoto .Street. See Figure 1 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ASSLATTSONS In order to analyze each intersection,' there were oe! assumptions, in geneu l are as follows: Traffic signal timi ngs were nodi. ed from existing b. n: n % E4.4 e teriettoO" n operation. tviodifict.bns include both changes in individt. and 2. 'Peak 'hour factors use 4 bawl en ex.'s and 0m9 for the a, m. o . yy. 3. Truck percentages used in the aria„ ss Were turning movement comts on thy* truck counts performed Burin; 4. Each intersection',op tes as an isolated intersection. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PROCEDURE The analysis of the key intersections included: peak periods. These scenarios include: Existing Conditiol os with Existing Zoning traffic (Existing Zoning) Existing Conditions + BP Oil Company Traffic ( Pro pos ed Z onangD io different traffic scenarios for iiti•�� •�1�•i MARY !iA ✓ i•:ti . � •. �iti {� iii i � ��i�: iii I. ti. .al.. r.•. e'a.m. and �.r • Based on the analysis found later in this �'' � ' later o''e ,the following 'findings are ma dE;! in port The property under the existirl'._ zoning could generate l' approximately 426 daily hips (213 round trips). During the afternoon peak hours approximately 54 two -way vehicle trips WI!. occur at the propose rite driveways. • The. BP O0 CQm n pro � r ty,, a t .�. �s exp ' ected . t o ge neri te approximately rately y 1,860da ic trips (930 round trips). During the afternoon ternoon , pM .4 hours approximately 80 two-way veh. cle trips will acue at the proposed site driveways. The pk.vezty i sexpected to generate a roamatei 26 more trips during the afternoon peak than the existing Lr. `a. '' ® This traffic analysis for 'the BP Oil Company property has been prepared ttisin a devi. . the prepared �; �. a op�e�,t. scenario supplied by the applica . The land use assumptions in most o< es' represents a higher level of p rr n , higher 4 ` development , than cu • The existing road rretvirk system �nth n the ` stuoy area as caam ents`y operating at umnacceptable lever of service. Capacity s! m encies exist during the p.m. ptiak od at W challs and NI.Dalcoka. This capadty dek.ency rt4�ins `to the it a irate r a�ci�ag SW ,��.holls Ferry Road w� accommodate Pe ... , to s.,.. , ills �: rg ,per rams the t ��" a number of vehicles. Main street. The impacts on the stn,. t system of thy► BP Oil Com �aany' pr ur deer ether existin'` o � Y P pe.y g proposed zoning are not significant. SOCIATED TRANSPORTATION �trPT1UN ENt lts1 RI L NI1Nd ATEp lW 4he saudy area has been determined ase d'. Sri guidelines recommended,'in couversations with JDOT and the City Tigard Staff. The 'gui lines'- state that if . the ratio of \,site gene -raa(1 traffic to existing traffic on 'a given link is greater thiar 10 ,' percent, then this link is inipactQiJ by the site and intersections LI n this link shouid be analyzed Based .on` this guidelines' and discussions with the City of Tigard, the following intersections:vivere aria 1) SW Scholls Ferry Road and N:Dakot i/ 25th Avenue. Add5Uana ly the drrveway access points klentified by the BP Oil C ©n tpany proposal were included in the analysis for future road conditions. SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT LAND USES' The ��Y question i uestion is lc� led on the Southwest Corner of SW Scholls ''Ferry Road and N. P Dakota and presently has a veterinarian once in a converted sfingle family dwelling. The existing building, is to be relocated to the rear of the property with the service station to be located on the front portion of the property. The property is ocarnded by residential properties to the east and south and would be a conditional use in the proposed zone. EXISTING ROADWAYS SW Scholls Feny Road is a major east west link, thnxigh this portion of the qty of Tigard and is described as an Major street in the Transportation Element of the City: of Tigards Comprehensive Plan. SW Schoils Ferry Road !inks Hwy 20 at the Sunset Corridor with Tigard: and 'eaverton on the South and West. 11-tr a dst�ng roadway is a 2 laiw�e arterial Nit! left turn major SW Scholls Ferry Road . lanes at m 'or inter<►e��tian y s ehcpecte�� to be re�rrstna�+t�o during the years ' i. 1...h .. 7 ig next two ears to �l dive lane major arterial roadoMay � turn � cets and traffic s� nals at the major intersections N. Dakota is a designated Minor Collector Suet that flows SW Sch Is Feviy Road to the ° «commercial areas of SW Gr nburg Road on the east N. Dakota pis generally a wo ' . � bine section with parking allowed, on both sides of the street., IATED TRANS RTATi�N ENGINEER! & PLANNING PEAK HG1Jit TRAFFIC VOLUMES MD, OPERATE ? Morning an evening peak hour turning movement traffic counts were coiirducted at the key i tersections', listed above by ODOT..These - intersections are 'a adjacent to the BP Oil Company property and along key arterials` in the area. The morr,-ring peak hour .was found to be 7:30 to P 8:30 a.m. and the evening peak hour was from 4:30 Ito 5:30 p.m. Upon review of these peak; hour traffic counts, the p.m. peak period was determined to be the most critical time in terns of traffic impacts at the intersections in the 'study ark. ,. ! No adjustments to the volumes` have been made to account for seasonal variations in traffic volumes. Figures 2 and. 3 "'show the testing a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes at , the key intersections in the study area. TRIP GENERATION Estimates of total daily a.m. and p.m. eak hour driveway volumes for the existing uses were developed from empirical observations at many similar -sized facilities located throughout the United States. These empirical observations are summarized in as standard reference manual published by the institute of Transportation Engineers, and are supported by additional independent studies concluded by both the California Department of Transportation and the Arizona Department of Tranportation. Estimating the number of vehicle trap ends that will be generated by the proposed development is of prime importance in order to accurately assess the impacts of development on the road network. Two basic procedures are available to traffic engineers for estimating Ike a num of cdriveway ' or estsrna�.ri bee o vehicle trips generated by a proposed but not - -existing deveio m en: � it a • Apply averages observed: through field studies conducted ed at ether similar fadlities located throughout the United States. A number of sorntes are available! for this information including Trip C,grcrat [4th' Ea d: r) 1987, which is published'' by the Institute Transportation Engineers (ITE); and summary trip generation re,_ its prepared by the California Department of Transpotaton, the Arizona Department of - o - 1'rao r sportat_ io. n, and, other public c transportation agencies. All of these sources provid e excellent e (dance n estimating rati � the to i . Ia generation rates for various land usf s, but obviously do not take into account the effe.•ts of local conditions nd` unique characteristics of the proposed land u • W 2. Observe through : eId studies the `actual 'drip generation characteristics of other similar d existing developments within the local area Procedure one above was used in tine dev Iopar eo�it'of this report: Table 1 shotir ►s: numb& of vehicle trip enrk to be generated by thci ct,irrent zoning on a peak hour basis . ased on the. Mathematical rr�ressson equaticr�rs Pe based mss,= r ..... ON ENGINEER' , i 8e PL NI 164 AT' SO�.NATE D TfZA�OVSP'� R�"A�' r •1 an one n ,47:.4,., .!%•.,...,,,,, .. ,:: ;:,.:1::::' :.'14:1,',:7,;,:„;:, :,:, ,,,,,,..,,,..,,,i,,,,,.,.,,,,,,,.,,..„,:i...e,,,,,...4.4...:4, ii.,:‘,.,,,...4,,i.,,,■„,,,.....i.,.,,,,,•.,,,' .",..,...:..., , :•*a.:::.,.:','„.**,:,• :•,,:i‘::7,1:',1.4,,,,,i.: 4...:',.' ' ,:.' •:.:'"Ii‘a..... 1 l'''.."'''1.:'4‘:;'`.'.7:4.".: ..',..,.-',...4 • • Alf generation rates at similar sites throughout the United States and found in Section 540 of the Trip Generation Manual (4th Edition)' For the purposes of this anal sis it is assumed that none of the home-related person trips s will p po �Y P P be made by mass transit. This assumption is considered to be appropriate since even though Tri -Met provides service to within about one- quarter mile of tie site. Further, assuming no transit ridership results in a worst -case scenario for traffic impacts to the street system. Table 1 Projected Trip Generation For Current Zoning ee TRIP DISTRIBUTOR 49 WI The distribution of generated trips onto the roadway systfon within the site area was determined by revievving the existing distribution at the main street intersections and the distribution pattern determined by METRO using the EM1v1E2 traffic model. Fig i , g distributed the surrounding road Figures 4 and 5 shop the. estimated site -generated traffic distributed fo y site-generated Figures and 5 were combined with the existing system. The ate- enerated traffic shown in Fi urea 4 traffic volumes shown in Figures 2 and to arrive at the total traffic: for the property under the periods shown in Figures 6 and . existing zoning for the a.m. and p.m. 'peak in 'g� LEVEL L ®F SERVICE i. terms l at the key intersections in 'the I' p of service, ey The peak hour traffic operations', in �errrrs of levels o study area were examined with procedures siercribed in the 1985 Highway Capadty Manual (Reference 2.) Level of Service (LOS) is a concept that was developed ' rent � _ .. . __ to measure how the dnv >�, perceives the conditions surroundin them as they travel through ',i a.;y � ey rough a 'siRn�,�ized inter! section or r r1at w y segment. This degree of perception includes such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impedances caused by other vehicles. As ori,,�ally defined by the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual denote the various LOS; defined al suc grades are used .. ., ..... .. M -.. .� p'.. ... � • 1. . to .. ... .., �,,.: : "• ,� D" �'1 these grades are shown in Table 2. Using this definition, it is generally ;.g��'ed that D LbS �s the minimum acceptable for an urban :yea. ASSOCIATED AT TRANSPORT . ,. .... iC►N ''Er�iGI�IEERING � � P� �i��I�I�ING (At'011 PAC ►� ' A�, i_ 4 • ♦ � -i . , •''iii`. • : • LI •'i •'L i r 4�:i '. i ►• li • • .:. A •'i•. A••Af •i' fqop + �i .l• �• • 4'fl� w Bbl • a.0 • • i`..Y. •. t61:„.• • C '•i • • • : " -...•• . • r i6 • ▪ • Y • i 6,4'4 • • .i .4 •. • • •„� • • , • • A • � is -,i A. • 4'.. • • • • :'.:•. • A ..4 ".".^$'1i, Table 2 Level Of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections etr�eiyyvoa rsK ter i e n:;w�th: ►, r Vii; . ''�:.;:i :;:iii ?: ;: ;;iu;e";fCOn es tl n :1�e i?rg:a o l~ Ci�oticeab�P 1 11 e �:•r� :.i :Y:� r' '� i: Sri•: i�iy •i'�iin a�lan ::nfava .a bl�:�� m .� ;iy i. h� I ij. ratio. �, �•• ::.: :,l'<. ! lvl��i�l ; +�� f�l� :��.� ��..h�ii��a,r�. �r� �en�1 � .:�..:::.►- C �? `'n es west I �sisc�ns�ner� nerarl r .n i �''w lT.T.•: ..fin,.. •.T•�♦7'1^.•:T 4�°7':�.'I•Y4 rt�.`t,: .T•r•P —•7:r n.. ^ ,. !. _ _ _ I;•la^ v y bre :r��i� •'�a,, fiti$:• +o iii' ��itl�� ;��,�.�� • a �. � ..�.:, :��.f � � tatty' • x� i:ra ::ti :• �.:1.ley' : ,• :•:tiY: is ;a •':•: "iii: i •' '�Y`•1' 4 :. : ♦:':•: f::•: �� :Y::'ii! i:•i:•:•i 'i: • •: : ::: :::: •':: •: i::•: i:':•i :•: �:'i � ii:•i }iii:'• 4 i :'•iti• a�;�rratc A$SO IATEC) TI�NS��k l.�N EI��GIh�E ING .& Pl�1NRIl1�G ATEP) PAGE. eirse :v.,•., ,'tit f �. •, titi z,. •. • .,rip o ♦ ..•. h ?�} <�� ; � ;:.ti;:ti{• • ti •;;:, v. + able 6 indicates that aci lend es exist during the .m. ak �pieriod at S S+ R ' � P �i- O Y Roaid and I\i. D ota.` ►i� capacit +'defideicy per ins to the amount of,traffiic on 'the that:restricts the amount `of greet time allocate e side street. The side st eet:' ;experiences long delays waiti � to exit onto the main street. ?;r:•, 7$ � v;: is {;tit }ti � {. };: t;:;:;:; !.L�% � %Yf:tiL!:'At. JIYiV \Y.•.11N::! tfiL • Scenario two includes development of the Bp Oil Company property tinder the proposed zor�in This scenario would change the exist't zoning 'frown `,Professional :Office to General °commercia and BP Oil Co. to operate a service ,staaaon render, a conditional use.; The proposed development consists of a 'l.o 'iimp service station with ';a small convenience store of approximately 600 square feet and a sicogle vehicle car wash, The convenience store is designed to serAce the customers from the service station as as th4e, car wash. The station will give discounts on car washes if the vehicles buy gas. The car Was is designed to handel one car at a time and is not designed as a b!gh; volume car wash. Access into the site tinder this scenario Would inciude one access ;point ®1 Road, and one on N.Dakota approximately �1e�0 'feet ►ct � of 'SW, cE-a�lo SepFigue1. •.: r i _.`..�. {;: r�.. r ::�ti: {?:•'r{'.;:Y'• :: +r,:;. }:titi^"..r- S: ri:4�:::�<::•X4:titi+ IMINOMMISIMIONNOWINOMMINV NOTES: A. GSF = gross leasable squar feet B. Includes both inbound and outbound trips Assumes that 40 percent of the trips attracted to the nvenr C. Pe � � .p � nilts�f the de�elo n7ent and 58 percent of the trips attracted to the is s, tJon represent drop-in trips or by -pass trips by vehicles that are already on the adjacent road system. As allowed by the Trip Generation Manual ( 4th Edition) a: a 10, this also assumes remaining . r ... and . that l rernarnrn new a . o t This easumpt on is hared on studies published the diverted vehicle trips are new to the site. n studaes u�lrsitied rn "ITE Journal ". This reduction accounts for trips that would otherwhe be double counted because they are already on the mad These e`_ rrp s .r. include stops made by persons entering eri, ng or leaving vearby commercial and residential property, and by pewsors whose primary e stination is to other commercial areas. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that me of the home- related person gips will be made by mass transit. This assumption ignores the recent projections that 4-6 percent of all home based person trips for purposes unrelated to work will be made by transit. Therefore, i ttleson, Wayne K. arbdl Lawton, T. Keith, "Evaluation 0t' Shoppin Center Trio Types", 6 E inurnal, Volume 57, Number 2, kW-6411087, P&:: 5 l and Grov F. "Reddut ion in E m . l.. , T Spade, O:o�sis , j. � _ �, reek E., ate oaf 1'r�i irr�pa of iZe�a9 ��hopOi. Centers' ITS carnal Volume 51, Number 1, januaryo 1981, Pg •16. Smith, Steven , " gy g p . mpact � alb f Shopping Cti r �n i"ra�flo � �enteirs" � �a� �`�� , ®i'Va�rraabwr �� Il�acss b ri .. ASSOCIATED T SPORTATION ENGINEERING PLANNING (ATEP) n , ogures 'and �, show tie estimated , site - generated ystem. The site- generated traffic shown in �=�gter - °afiac volumes hown on Figures 2'`arrd' 3.t% ar eat e proposed zonin for the aa .m pea our levels of service were determined a , leveloprnent of the BP Oil Company property underr and indicates that the intersections `within ,fie sttu seavi a except . the non-signalized intersections. peons osed zonin area will fun ire the study area star tee. plan.designatians. %b e tan at an , adequate level` headway during the morning (6 :00 am between (4 :00 pm and 7:00 pm). The BP Oar Company prmpe T'ri -Met Route 56, wh Vyashin on Auai and Highway ases r ' is currently ;sen"e runs etw en Wa ea' ertnn hied h minut to 9 :00 am) and 15 minute headways during .4 4 O. 4. 4 • 1..4 "4 4 • • • 4 '4'4 • '64 • 4* • 46 '4 • 4 4. 4 4 • 4 ,4 • 'I • • .,•'• ft .111 • :41: • 666 44 iv*. 4 • • 4 A A ,4 • u: A 4i. * • 4.; I• 66 • • _4 4 66. • 4. • 4' 4 stirE. * 4 • II.' 0, 61 0 0 01 4 4 • '4,4 • • 4 '4, 4 4 4 , O. . . e. ,4 4 4. • 4.116 0 ' 4 4 4 • 4' 4,c, 4.,4 4, • 4. 46, s 4, 4, 4,1•4444" 6.1'.4 • s 4 4. 46,1' .4 4- 't ,4 6 .4 • W 4 4 .4 4.,4 66 4.4. 4 • . ,4 0, 0 '0 4 4 '4 4, 4 . 4, 0• 0 0 '6 '6 10 0 6f 0 61 4,4 4 4.4 '66 •',46. • . ▪ i L . • Y . ♦. . • •.• • • • 'L•.. •'. .l � • • ♦ s • } Llts . Y. ▪ } • iii• •1Y• • • • • . r R • •'. • i • d • • } • i • • • •.-L • Y• • • Y •..• • • • •'• • • •F.,,ti . •., 4. • • . • • • • • • • 'L!y..k • • Y •.. • ♦ • • 4...L L • Y . 41. • • • • • • • • i.• • Y . • • •. •�T • • Y.Y • \ •�.• • • or • • •'• • • •^41 O • • • • • • • • • • } 4.. • 1''• • Y . • • • L • • • I•Y'•' - -� .•• • • Al A • • • • • •.• • • • • • • • • •. • • • • • '• • ♦ •'. •..••••F -• •i• .G....• 4 ..LI M a•d♦a;• • r± } • a'ry • ♦4, 4 4 44;44444,44444' • • • . • • • •. a • Y •a'• • i,i 4,4 •a �.4 4414 .14 a +••,a 4 '4''a4 • a••'a;'aaa'• 4. �♦ • •a,� y... • a a s w a• a +• +• • •4 4•:.• • • L1'U.a. •:44'44444,444 a a 44.4 a a•.• a •• a_ a a,♦a•r.a as a44 4' a •+•'•• a ' �.• a -a • • •• 44444444444444,4'4 ' 7. •4 4,4 • •a 4 4 i, • a a • • i i • • • , • • a 11 aaa•a 4 *444.444 613 1098 11 se.13 • • • • •.• • i • • • • • • • • ii..i • • •.• • • b •Y • ••• • •:•.• • • ••Y •• • •• .fix. • • • • i, 4 i. E .. • r • 4 414' •• • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • 4 ••- 4,.•..yr••i • •r,.. • ' I• .:•ice'- ;; r : ♦ },:; �: };.� rv:: ft::; {'::} ?;:•h:$ ,S ►', "' v'r:S�ti�:v }:S };•r,: {'r,:ii::: :d;�:: ;.,. {r.;;i:. }, {:: :•' ?i:'li:'{.,:. y[�,,M� p {A�l:,��4�:71:tiv''••:::'v {:r? r v:•: tier::;:{; }:•::;:,yvi'rY }; {:•,:ti � i5.�;:i; },:; ti{� ?;:; {r i:: {• : �: r r.v •: fah ir•. ▪ . he deve opment of the BP Oil Company propeaatyy `u'nder, the propose I t pattern, Will 'not severely impact the surrounding street, system The , p roposed ioriang will generate approximately 1,860 trips per day apprexornate l �► 98,d of these trips are by pass trips that are already on the roadway). The proposed coning will generate approximately 875 new trips per day.. The proposed 'zoning` would generate approximately 79 trips during the p n peak „hour ( 41 trips in an-I 38 trips out) ▪ The existing Zoning would generate appro dmateiy 426 trips per .d ►y.. The 'proposed zoning would generate; approximately 54 trips during the pm peak hour (9 trips in and 45 trips out) The proposed woruing wiir generate apprdxirrtiate 25 more trips d rring :th .pm peak hour than the existing zoning. • The inclusion of a convenience I store into the proposed development requires, tha* trip rates d . •p � rates are considered foa'••�a s a store be used. These standing 'convenience store and not a caoveniti,nce store assodated 'with a service These usually y _rs for the service station and Val little se stores u�uall are sertr�, b the �ustmrnea tragic is generated outside oa` the service station. By. using a Free standing cOnveniensice store trip generagon greatly „erates tie edual uumber of trips generated by tlits typo `' of development• t rlfi ▪ The existing zoning wou ►d generate More `p the south into tne� leighburh d try s tc► the proposed development. This type of development relies very beady on a is in • i, e.. s g+' i/eha y . traffic.- �Qn�. this its the only service station on tho, amid rnany� of the e�as�in ' , cYes. both SW SChOliS wind ®n N. �acota will use this faalc ' vehicles tAfi gre.ot disttoces to use this facli. The improvement of SW Sch+ as Fe `t d to a five lane se or 'Co , ' 99"1 vi II gre improve traffic flows in flue are. SOCIATED PANS POP ATI ENGINE ERIN & IPLAN N O' t� . ,: ; {�;: >i�• $is�y T• �''•' r:,;: �': y? �: ;,�h'•Nr;•'R;lIfT;.']wTiT�.��T� i. •9.., . •:{:;y::;: }r : {:i:'•s $iiii'+,v h`:,'+.�f'=?: ;vY,. i:v:;: :. Th deveVoprnent be ciegrned no Ir a set 'pie c oI: s An allow for free ow o onto and out of 'die dr vewa Ors. F • oho L ek ^ound This rep�rt Will s�pp1emext the �pp�aca o mad e r ia submitted b y BP Oil Company and the traffic analysis prepared proposal's relationship with the Tigard Comprehensive Flan. BP Oil has submitted a ;rezone petiion from Professional Commerc: to G nera Commercial for e o canst. u tii a `BP sere is station with a small mini-mart and a car wash. Thi deve.tpmen will retain the j,istins veterinary y ini station will feature extensive 1ardscapin a r V411 buffs in 4 t from ieighbc r ;n re: id`ent a ...neighborhood SurrOun� r i intense residential development, °. Apartment c ristrr. ioz" very high T'ne proper, t'y across South Dakota Street to the' this subject property iS alsoeig marketed for Iw 'apa?t evelo ment, The prop�,Y' ty i s at the: southi� es South` bake+ '' Street'. Sc +,hoofs Fe- :I. E kota is a coil ector Scholls Ferry Road >.s included in the Oregon Sta te Department : c} Transportation' ear Highway Improvement Program for widenin from two' to four lanes; xt is anticipated this work Zvi'; completed within the nest two years. The redeye to ament of the sdb ec.t prep �~ty wi l doe l dane� anti cip t: y the Scholls 'Ferry Project setbacks, landscaping and access wi l all be coordinated with the State and the specific pl�rs for the street. This will help relieve current ,end f.ut'ure ion maximiziri the i.ency`. ri � rsect b ,. ,. at this a. to y S This, action Will hel) implement 2UNE C!!1 ad s provide and encourage a `, sa onveni..errt and econc transportation system. onformanae with the CoOPt henslYe . Plan particular area for the ,types . ervi ces being prOPosesi The nearest ±ParorriatelY gone d areas tra it are av'a lable tyke of use ai7e one to trio miles away to the east and choils Ferry Road¢ 'he plan anti c.ipafes neighborhood cam, erc .i l end ara essior4al com�mercia uses, such as the veterinary c in G anc the adjacent.. day • care center, to serve the surrounding` >opu .ation without requi ring si�� ficantly loang auto t�obi�.e trips. ; lvelghbonc�rod c.ornt�erq�al' uses are! intended t be convenient an�1 provide :for tie . ayr-to -days 'needs of the surrounding 0opulaton The 3P Oil development i s _: atenoed to help reel the d y —t day! reeds of < the surrounding population. However, bY virtue these us not being allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial. Professional Commercial zone, this "zone 'Change ic necessa, .. ZONE, ese types of _ nee he. sub.je.c ".t :proper,ty. T:�aere; are'aa` least this,' number: :of `'spa• .e same 0:t7.00, � n , intense M r�a'ricet far t mrnerci n t that serve the day -to —day needs of '+-he residents Tne °Comprehen -- a .' f s, ve 'Plan wisely i,dentifi d a�'p�� i< .e.,.....k1.0.,-,.:pro vide ,land for `these�� types �._ ..ie� ` of neighborhood 'commercial acts °� i" �°r �1iti Vin., the ne:ighro hoods they are ' intends d to serve . However, .?aes ;tint provide . enough' appropriately zoned land ; meet ,the reed' he FOP Oil proposal is intended to meet the same neighbor hco to—day needs as the uses typically, aliowe< Commercial zone., However '' the zoning ordiria'nce, '`by vii excluding service stations in neighborhood commercial zones, floe; not al low this to occur, As well, the `zoning map, °.by not allowin enough appropriately zoned land to meet the need, .does not allo this Ccur_ service station Will provide gasoline and': %o1 this to a�� _ _ The s g products, as Well as ..automobile service, The cat wash will e F convenience to the area : residenc . li miter roceri`es ►i.tlhin easy wal Ci.ng distance 'he Comprehensive` Ilan :a , to� address the' ne`d 't ne" 9hbo'rhood scale. °� impact o a service stat r sp ec th_ ou h ,. actdr 3 . service stations a cond :an oil intends todesign and cozns trust this , faci l,i„ y t attrt it .i re, compatible part of tie neighborkoo� t'..;.. de needed da y-t -toil, o borhood r� much greater x:tent t1 an the` Professi nal Carr n 'vee Plan throu' i the zoni Since the tom reh�iW_si . p � n not providing for pattern of the area, . the; ne Change s, ne;e. ear a, Cvn c1 v�son s through the redevelopment .of the proper , the pending �, idoning of Schools Per Road. 'et Jerry Offer Tigard Planning D P. 0. Box 22297 Tigar`d, . OR 97223 OPA 90 0003/VAR' '90 0001 : CUNNI �GHAN /B'p � a `Lots 2400; Map 1S1i 35AD ,.: Dear :Jerry• �e�Ced ward .at limiting re�.ai] � The Cities of Tigard and Beaverton have wo commercial development along S.W. Scholl.!,., Ferry Road.'; have ..detrimental, recognizedithat commercial development is necessary:'. U.or�fever, it can h on abutting `residential propel. ties , as well .64 adjacent :atreets is that of ,additional ?access Of particular concern, with " regard to this ; equest, ' ad ded �.nalesc . ess, points onto Scholls Ferry Road. The' Git ' Wocdld not ,object, pr to !S.W. North Dakota. Secondly„ in reviewing this", appiieatien i the limited,, p. Oil and not ether' traffic analysis only evaluated the proposed use by�' g. Oil, . uses that could °be allowed under ,'the :zoning. : ,Other' vises 'could have .even . retail greater impacts.' �. development :should `necessitate the dedication Should the request be app�-<;�ved,, p, for Scholls Ferry Road. Furthermore, development should behcon itin of actna7 either construct the Schol! s Ferry ,rontage , or prr ✓ide improvements. . If Y ou have any questions, please feel free `to contact me at, .5 755 5:01, Griffi i Drive, • ILI FROM f, h MCDONALD,S pTL . ti99A ;15i2' 10220 W Gra nbu g `Remo r , ; Suite 350 Portled.; Oregvn A732� .603/03.4400' April 2 199 Tigard 'City Council c/o city of Tigard 13125 l Blvd 2 5� B � die l d Tigard, CR ;'97223 Re: fl . s -. Ci 1 Rezone C.P.A. 90 -03 /c 90-01 Scholia rer ry Road and N. ' Dakota Street Tigard. Orogoz)■ Deer City Council: f As representetiv4 of i cDonaid's corporation, please be 'advised McDonald' a recently became a property owner of reccr 1 , in ''the new development across Sw North Dakota Street which is part cif the St, Vincent development now in progress. As 'part of the agreome,Ot with St. Vincent, McDonaid's is committed to purchase additional pr`erty .. developments at a and Mcl�onr ld ' future date. Therefore, VasCan adjacent neighbor to the suhjcct °. proposal *bove McDonaid's is forwarding its input for your review and consideration. .. . support the proposed deve a r the McDonald's would au aio,prnent, following criteria. but under ] . zoning adj ustme;nt to CN, and c d not � CO. �y .'from ids current status of CP. In this manner, British P trop eum could b approved as a limited conditional use under the CH non'ing designation. Also, part of the conditional use stiplatic:�nluld be the site e be developed as a British Petro um f uOio g„ station (or other similar r oil company fueling station) . No Gther use would be permitted on site which_ includes disapproval any future . proposed restaurants on site. There may he oth i restrictions os..d restau� a .. proposed . , ..... . on site the cit�r may wish to include, if thin rezone were to be approved. 2. A British Petroleum fueling station with convenience 'stare io zoning if there is and e nt cr. zoning), , tti8 CP lowed ua acGep�a�le along with �r�cyQOf the ut�es�: a3 .0 1 cDonald's will not support ...., ity on the pit` S,. acar�.asiifaci�. po's d nt. The p�wifmary reason is that ea f�rztish pear ®leu�t; evelop�ne . 3 potential 11'162 fisr' t!le teat .proPett ' wash. fa�i.it. is a ►tent e OCcUr �tcDQnik 1d'0 s recommera t abavt' trite ria. 'if the p app t.,1;'41', Tb ank you f this ' dta' ter;f McDonaid's neighbor under the above Soh Sherwood Assistset real 'Letate Manager c :` l ariaL ne Chietian- Gri£f i h Peter POWe1$ ►hn Van Curran a:0436r •v • Cis TtARDy 'a 4R�ON CocJNCZ 2lGSIoTDI�I.'I �;BD „CRY;; AUBRD& OF. '4 3 90. ISSUE/AGO/40A 'iITLE:B L_Zl /b CPA" 90 -03' C ,.90 -01 ~%- D}PT HEA CITY ADMIN 0; DATE , SUBMXTT'RD s 4/12/90'„ PREVIOUS ACTIONS, 'Planning Coiamieeion recorentendati cn of approval of . a :.' . modified . ro PREPARED BY: Naith Lidern - REQUESIMD BY • LICY ISSUE Should `4he land use designation for the southwest corner of S.W. North Dako i and: echo1is Ferry Road be •41anged from Commercial Profess onal to ` Oeuer a<; Comnnrrcial or.,. as proposed' by the Planning Commiasion, to Coaaanercii Neighborhood? IP ; RMikTiON! SUMMARY The Plannin Comion g reviewed ,,a r '; na }:Eve P %an � F�msndaient cial General. and a g from Commercial Profeeal,onal , tQ (Consaer Lona Chaan a from egnee for m � rare ( Commercial Profeseion0.4 yto C ( ;Comaaarcl al Cenral) on April 3,;w 1990. The Commieeion decided t� recommend an alternative propo sal to eignate the de northern portion of the property Commercial R'eighborhoad and a emallea area to the south 'for, 'Commerr.3 81 t ofesss*ional . The applicant cwae advised by she staff to suggest the amsunt of area desired ,far each detgnmi; ®n gat the council hearing. The a e. traffic:, ecrmnendee%% denial of the a licant's r t ,,y ,y Pp . � � ` priaas il�, , due to, the P desi ation . th . .. ' r ®commendation for ;a C,,,� _ � would not laosEn these ,pateaffi�ial eb cts impact's that are likely to bo aeesoeiated with this Chan e .. ” imPa well. Attac�,c ie a co o sion�s' ",:propoaal ai eta>r f recomMends denial. Of , the Commie f, the ,'a lication � staff re rt to the 'Commieeion; Fp and ere oz`E3, the py PP s and the ` Co nmleeion minute8. ` AI,TUENATIVES3 CvONSIDB Deny the equ ions r e,�t anc�, direct s afi to prepare d�.n reaia�lut P Par , a corraopon Approve the applicant's request or the C:d k iesionc'e recommend taf .,, ' ' prepare a corresponding a�eeolut�.ore.' alternative and direct a to r® FISCAL IMPACT Deny CPA 00- O3 /8C 90 BPOIL /kl 01 and SUGGESTED. ACTION react staff to tare pare 'a resolution p • • o •u • ♦. • CZ a.� • . President Moen called "the meeting ` to ; :order held at the Tigard Civic Center - 'TOFIN BA Tigard, Oregon. • I�DLL cALL: Present: Premtiden c Mo + ; 'Commissioners Castile, F'asoler','' Fyro, and Peterson. at T:I w ' r.. ++ • 45 PHe °'1'ht+ ,,,.�ti.ng was:; 13125 59 Hall Boulevard, . Absents Barber, LevAlrctt, and Saporta (one vacant position' �' Staffs Senior Planner Keith . -,. ith .idea f anning Secretary Diane 14. Jelderks. Coasnissiover Fyre moved and Cclagni lsioner Feeler seconded, to approve the minutes as corrected- motion carried unanimously by commissioners present. Commissioners Castile and Noon abstairrd• Letters from tie ' public regarding agenda item 5.2 had been ,distributed to the Commissioners., Presidont Moen had received a brochure from the Army Corp of Engineers that tie passed on to staff. Also, he reviewed a letter from the State . Highway Department regarding notification of upcoming improvements to Pacific Highway between Pfaffle and Commercial Street 5 • PUBLIC BEARINGS 5.1 coxPREHMslim PLAN AMENDI T CPA 90 -00004 : 90 -4002 BOodehmisvimcga, ppo.'45 A re ueet for approval of a Comprehensive Plan mendment to change the use designation from .fight. Industrial to' Geateral Pe amercial and tory e g o0in desig ation frosts I -L (Light . ha,'� a .she s g Industrial) to. C--G (General lramnercial y . fONE s I - Mt Light : Indust#L*1 y LOCAtION: Between SW 72nd AvenMe rind interstate 5 and south of the. C egon Business Park (WCTM 2S1 13AD,, tax lots 1700) Lance Strout, Mckenzie/Saito, explained that there is a problem 'that. they need to address and,they would like the hearing postponed to Nay eth in order for them to come up with 'a solution. * Cc�o tei.esi ane�: Peterson moved and coy ieei osier Fyne seconded to postpone CPA 90 -000 ' . ©-0002 to the 1 a 8th 1 LL 90-0004 and ZON 9 y tanning 'Com�a,es;onr ' hearing. el " b - Cos missioner8 Motion earthed unaniil�u y ' l � prebent I , PLANNING coMMIssIO0 MI TES - APRIL, 3' ' 199D PAo VI r e, 1=- Lu .2 lasti $ I cUNAINGWiMf B l�iFi O ' 17 ` A 1 amen ti.o .change ,the `lan to General Commercial aria (Professional coin•- -`ercial) o Scholia Ferry R* Ad (WCTM 151 Senior. Planner 'Liden , reviewed the Materials submitted ; by' tl a app (icant; • the public. H explained that all the prob ?.ems`.related to traf .and that iE l of the criteria had not been' Met. Staff' as 'reC ►baoien dental. yv requesl d use ' des change' C-C (Genet tax . tot approv r al 'of a Ca ehens; at on' from' Pro f aesiona3 coning designation' :o Joer�iul a . r 3 ATIOW 2400 ire <, snore 12,5 R.PLICANT' f3 numorzexag John !an Curen, PP Oil, reviewed. the ,existing sate and explained that , i n i would be removing the erki mIting ;'veterinary clinic and build a new clinic a the back of *;fie site. He stated that he fear; boon talking to the neighborly g bA 'Area. That the proposed use w3�il. , not , generate e more traffic it will concerning �� :ct to t . 'only use existing traffic.. They auticipate 'that' percent of their business',, *all _ be for" vehicles . within a mile and ;half radius of the, site. That tt „ay would post a bond to. insure that they +mould, develop the site as proposedl4 Diecussien followed with Coeaiiarionere`.regarding acce ©s.onto SchollsFerry Road, a`trcu]ation of traffic on the site, and the type of structures` that would be coAstructed. Richard Woelk, ATEP, Inc. 4040 Dougaas May, Lake' Oswego 97035, had'prepai'od the traffic study. He explained that the one ,change ,speaks is nario peak hour traffic, there ewould be 41 vehicles the worse case gcneralitios and not to c � • pm Pe Vii/ He stet ^ fie addressed concerns 'regarding ' access ' onto Scholls Ferry ,Road and stressed that this is a site rePecifie developments Discussion followed regiuNiLIMI, tripe generated from .tile different types of uses. Rai p t h `o 3l g er , 1600 SW' Cedar e dar F ille Bo ulaTard, 77225, Attorney y or the property owner expressed surprise are no esrw&ce stations along Scholia Ferry Road exce pt for prngs ss. He that, the existing use is an eyesore and is inconsistent with the area. That tare . is a great need for a service station in this area tr:a this facility Vill be nicely desi9ned and lancecaped. A110, the existing a_ :teas for the site is located on .North Dakota almost at Schoywi s Feriky Ro'4 and the proposes access is safer because it will be 180 feet frW. !_ .,olss , Ferry Road. Fie encouraged the comn►,iasiOi to recom e'ni approval. PLANNING CC t4MISSION MINUTES - APRIL 3 , 1990 PAGi la • IJBLIC TESTD1014Y Bob Lareell,'.'120:40 'SW ere been a tesident' einae, :1975 and ha 2eeii the area eirieting traffic problems. station will not geneate more traffic it will oLdy aee s4.1 e a Oteating, the ice ,Ystation. ' The • ' Melinda Nelsen,. 10760 'SW ,,SumMer Lake, '*igatdo'' ',.epPeeed . the 'Pr/Ogioseill. She, felt the cervice 'station 'Would" detract from the lit; 'h ileiglhbotitood. Even though the',proposarl' may not generate traitticl:Lt,,, gen:Ntate in and out traffie., .She was concerned 'about the .„aesthetics cf a.' servir,:e station, the nOifie level of 4the',car wash, and how 0:Ole it would be to the 'residential area. -.. -• ," Lee, Cunningham, 133e5 SW 115th: Ave. , Tigard,' 'owner. of the skip, stated that thi.e was not planned that ,B1* had contacted him. Stated , • . , . road (North ' Dakota) 1 we put in, then the light, dad im the,: Intuie fie lanes will be constructed to aceedickidate the traffic volumes. He addett' that he ts a member of NPO t 7 and wao quiestioned.at .g.eArth of the ,members regarding the propOsal at a ,:aeliting,:sthat they held „prior to the one with BP, which did 'nOt, haw 1 a quorum. ''''. Ever: though there meta Concern 0 everyone seemed to want the service station. 'He stated :he , eurprALeed y staff's denial. ke knOiw the City had concerns,' tegarding strip comMercial, but did,,not feel this wai-itiappening:. • 1 I I o - Fred Niedner, 10500 ZW Tarpan, Beaverton, nei.ther" ,favored or oppolited "the , proposal. He wa concerned how muci properto wonld,.be rezoned 'a:441 ie it would cause the area to the west to become e�rial. He ;was. also concerned about the height of fixtures and tigni:4 He added that his property would have a higher value if the properly i zoned C-P rather, than REBUTTAL o , .7,2itt Van Curen, stated ,th,..44'. the 'Oar,Witigli,,wOU1d be' ./.„)plin ',from 7:00 'aim to 9:00 pm .and that th e. r:itafif leve/'',Would be belisist't.he allowed. 1irnLts They iOUld provide landae,aping and buffering to protect kim remidentiat liteta, and are flexible Wit' telatdd to the,..neede Of the 'fleighpotioOdi , . pineuetiLo n. folioNed regarding the Criteria which :wil="4611t6:.b0,, to the n.te, d What H tinted eetVide, 'fitiktioti, is 11Clited7',eithittr: tre' a petrt..t.ttfad iitise or a condi:tic:1st:al. Ude: • I I PURIgnC 11:62AING eLCORD o deamiebionet Peterlion felt that .thts, l'heighlbctig Cc .1Altcujei0 ,h4044ef,torti, protected. Generally he i4ite' in favor. ,i1SUpperted, having 'tit, median '0 rip constructed On Scholia.' Ferry Road and the groat vot,tiork..,o the property C N and that baCk portion C-P. roulinaNd dommiSsIoN =Nuns - • ieeioner Feealer coMane nted on trh reuld be adequate turning Rivet ,a 'ndour, 'n6,441-; fora gai atati `r m the car wash., SY�e favored aplil Ccsanieeioner Moen agreed to a certain, extent p�a.!nned itNr but never devrelop®d. props:rty ,axs a border for 'ther ne ghborhood. location of the car 'wash" was appr�.atea 3 a change in circumstances. Be„ favored 'Eon'ing, the, Commieeioner Faealer moved, 4.u3 ieeio' er PSteraon ai,enonded ,to forward • reooirtnendatioa to City Council 'Ito °aon +' the front portion of , the , • property • C -N , nd .,t0 -zone the -back portion ,of. the c■perty. 'C-P ;(where the site 'plan; ehowe the Veterinary c, li nic) ,° with` a �PD Over 14 on the entire . ;'aite., BY sed on the finding that there ,haa-- been a change,��o f .circwastascet since'' the rroperty was ,l'ust designated6 Motion carried 'bit ,majority :04,:.,:•::: 'Coma►' e0ione? 8 present. Co!nmieeioner Fyre 'voting ' ,�o. : ; o'xWig BUSI ! S coiumLeetoner P crier stated that had been n ,contacted by' they Tigai Sc. oo1' D iatrict becauee of the • critical pos Lion, they •are , ,n regair""din • available Space for students. She. augmented that' the School,Dietrict an City Council be contacted to a 'range :aatudy ileea on o d �tcue f e fir ' and etrategiea. Conseneua , iae to ccntact , City would like to purE ae, . ATNST Donald Moen: Fregid A ent dj/pcm4 -'3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 3, .e.990 Diane M. ` o • '- e, Secret GENDA, STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANTING COMMIES' HEARING DATE: APril 34 1990 7 • 30 :P$ NEARING ' LOCATYQ! : Tigard 'City Mall ‘, -- .Town, Hal 13125 St' Mt,ll 'Bj;vd. Tigard. OR 97223 FACTS', • ;GOneital Information CASE: COmprehvneive Pl n Amendment CPA 90 -0003 Zone Change g,ON 910 -0001 ODRST: 1) Plan Map Amenlment from C amercial Professional to General Commercial 2) Zone Change front C -P (Profeesional Con iercial -i► .distract to C -G (Gentral C'ommercial', district' APPLICANT :' Br;r'tii-41 Pe troleum Oil CcD• , AGENT: c/o Brian Duffye 'EP Oil' 3868 Prospect Drive, Ste 360 Rancho ;Cordova, C21.95670 6020 OWNER: ee cunniinghaad 13385 SW 115111 Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 12523.%N ,Scbc.11e • Ferry 'Road PROPERTY DESCRIP_XON: Wi cT'M Tax Lot 2400 '� 181 °35ADA Richard Woelk John Morgan ATEP, In!tC • 4040 Douglaa 'Way' Lake Oewogo,, OR ▪ Bac�Cgrciund; Infor anon The City council: an May 198 6 ntid art aiitealei�ognizin g t.thhe e no nconformin g uee nee On,' ion No. 86 -54 No other and or d.velo�ent proper,'cy (Reeolut � use. applications regarding This Bite have been reviewed 'by hit Ci�tr�r of. Ti'gElyd. • d nit, IraFormation iaerties abetting the j subject nits on the went and-H. souh are no' �u, -7(PD i, Reaidentia3, 1 unite %acre - Planned Develogm�nt)'. Properties �,o'i they went are develci` d `with single family reeiden S8 ►t ich aide octisred witir.3n; the sumtnexlalke eubdivieii�n The l and.e Care da ca �e centet� is itm%e�3iat+ely south cif the site. Properties to the seat acres "e Ski � rth Dakota Street. are t(*1ed C -N (currently being d%� eloped ' with a medL a't STAFF RFwPORT' PA 90- 0003/. 90 IIbOL �C ` qi � BRITISH FL WON lV 4 ;C rw I office building) C =P ( racant`) ,land C-- °.(;approval rec Gently. i0, 011f for a restauran ,' Furt her east ie the G �eenway r Town Ce der shopping center. Further eob�th on the east s`ld� of " tae . streeit ie y the , Neadowcreek ,Apartrerite and the. Anton. park ' subdivision. Props the north across SW Scholle Ferry;,„ Road are within the 'City of Beaverton. `M Site Infor ':tion and Pr opos Del The subject site is �a1•3a acre r�ectangu�l r. ehai,�et ,Mite " t o sated in` the: southwest quadrant of the intersect10n, rof " SW fiche lle'' tterrq�. Road and SW North Dakota Street. A veter, ary clinic is .`locrte l' in" a ;0ing�le story house quite ! "close' 'to ,the in "ersection. A, gravel'; pari.i.ng area i s '' iocateo between tire` housi and SW Scholia ►v irry Road. large bairn , presently used as a Warehouse by a landscaping „installation 41nd a+aintenance company is located tc the , ! outh of the' vet er inar` y" clinic aloltg SW North Dakota south Stra:rit. A second house 'occupied a garage, . construction �bueiness fe , located further ..�, The warehouse" and construction businesses are, noncanfo, ing. uoa in the ;,present C-P zone':' applied to the property. t The applicant requests a Man a amendment from Crcial Professional to General ' 1Crfameraial' ` and• , .a Zone } Change 'frcm the 'C -P ' (Professional Commercial), zoning distr_vt to the . C-G (General' Commercial) zoning district;. The applicant hoe submitted a statement,' designated fezoning . Application dated February . 12, . 1990 and a Y hh the proposed redesi 1990 in support o��the Analysis Although 8 �i'1 �Com�� , ds.._�. � �.�eruaat#;on�9' _Y r PPo � y � Ipo � gn would make the � sub jest pr•o,}�e=t available � fir clr�velh nt of any of the permitted : or conda,tio tal uses allowed in the 6-e inning distr'ict,' the applicant's gesonin g Application and Tran al ion Ana lysis , focus on use Of the site for a 'combined vehicle, fuel 'sales /car wash /convenience" store along with relocation, of the existing veterinary practice' to the southern portion. of the property. , Vehicle fuel .sales is a Conditional use in 4 ::-c moue. l tomobile cleaning, �� wain ens! food stores, and professional :off.iees are examples Of permitted uaen in the C -G zone. Figency a► nd NPO Comments The Engineering ' Division ,tee ',reviewed the "proposal as' �a `fera following comentsc STAFF REPORT A, traffic anaXysia hAS been submitted by 'tee applicant to on .he the request for a change in zoning. The traffic analysis adcpoos' that', if the zone change is approved, the 'property will he developed as a service station. I , he requested zone change eveL.oped for a variety o CPA 90- 0003/Z+ 40 -0d' would allow th retail sees. IAITI'i0 PETROL '.opertr .ca to I 'total 1 11 f1 s • 9 • us' develop peat would , gener;nts., average daily 'traffic volumes si m lar t© thoas re :aed i:n the ":`traffic ;analysis for . "a service ata ion »:k However, the' t'raffica geneara ed! during tile: afternoon peak "hour could be nuoh g�.•eater ..under .many 'of, the alllowed , uses.. Traf io is apart .c�alar co corn at tD a site» Currel�tly►,' 'the' City .` is receiving many complaints abrut the volume of`; t�af f ic: u sin SW North Gakota St ' et and travel ng `Yhrclugh ;the g. ✓ ea dential arieas to avoid congestGfon oo. Soholln. F ry Read. Retail coimnercial development of ,the site is 'li. iy to `cause same increase' in trafff is on JNorth -Dakota Street. Development of a service station could lead to a"greater traf €ic increaee on, ' North Dakota Str =eet thaiy that indicated by the f figure a . in the traffic analysis, due 4o thte unique, location of the site. There are no exiet"ing eexvice 'stgtione within `one mi e, o f the e�.te Dxisti�ng' on ng ` and:`exiet°ing development make it, unlikely; 1�711at station will be built within one .mil of the', site. Therefore., there is a • risk 'that goons traffic will be diverted from other. routes in order to utilize the service 'etati.on/ onvenience store proposell for the site. T, ffic diverted :rum Walnut'' Street, or 121st Avenge would be likely to,' u tilize 'Notch Dakota . a reet to accuse "the site. • Therefore, we recoreaerd that the proposed,Pian Amendatent /done change be ic problems in toe residential areas of '.''North Dakota Street' are reeol�ved» Washington County's Departmemtt of Land use and Trsnspeactation has recommended that in order to improve traffic mc�c��nent , o� SFi "Scrholls Ferry Road s major arterial, acres to SW Sschol,ls Ferry Pbad should 1� y be rohibitea'fcar an future develo nt of the Bite The Oregon State ,Highway D3,vieion hoe reviewer) the proposal arnd h�ta e proposal' due to the potential, for increased traffic b use0 allowed b` ✓ ecominandled de�aial of the y y the C-G zone ab compared 'to ty�aical "uses iii the c -P zone. and the effects of this additional' traffic on operation, of the Scholln /North ,Dakota ±ntereection The Highway Di:vis ,ot hay also commented t 1 be di icult to ,provide, direct �acc ®is ?itiu4�i had. it wil this site from Scholia Ferry Ro&d because such an' access would provide conf licta with a planned right turn ' lane from eatetbound. Scholl to d ening • a!iost ti g �y Di vieio n i© schetduled o ari� ��provre�ent po�set for this`secionof SC hcoolmlpsleFute r Rotd w the next io years. ra y The proposal was reviewed by seveiral memterre of 1NFA 7 at Ythe March, N PO meeting» Due to 'a lack o€ a qu `mil; the NPO stag ufla: lie to adopt an of ... concerns were raised with �^ar f icial recon�mendr�tion. d tc traffic pactn oon x iaa3►t3 rss cent streets nd ith. the compatabi] qty . of a w s ervice station with hjacent However` sevcra3 ro felt a great need this area» t � STAFF RE f?OR7 CPA go - 0003/zc 90 -00011 RRYT]SH PETROLRU P n The Building Division, Tigard,' Water, Diatrictg Tualatin Valley Fire Rescue District, and PGE have ,,reviawed the;' proposal. for a Plan Amendment /Zone Char;; ,e and have 'of fered, `no 'commente ox .oi jeatione. No other comments have ;been rI' aiv +ad. `PIAiDINGS AND 170NL`L[iSION The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals an and 12; Comprehensive'' Plan Policies 2 ,1.1, 4.2.2, 4.3.1, 5.1.2. 5.1. 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 7.6.1r 8.1.1, G.3.1. and 12.2.1 (Locational Criteria nor the General Co0mercial Plan deeignat on) ;sand the F. hangs Or aiatake ,quani- judicial Plan litP Amendment criteria o£ bona the .C_jmpreheneive Flan and Gomquunity Development Code. The Planning Division concludes hat the proposal a only„p'ar,t ally :in compliance.with'the( applicable Statewide Planning Goals baeee'i upon the following findings z 1. Goal 11 (Citizen involvement) © eatie�fied because tl'e City has adopted a citizen involvement program incltiding review of all ".land use lc enta apPlicationa by,ne- ghborhood planning orgamLzations and lave rpm P (NPOe). In addition, all public notice requirements rated to this application have been satisfied• nd Uee Plannin is eatief ied because the tPity ;hoe ' app1ie!r+ 2. Coal 42' (La fir) all applicable Statewide Planning :Coale; City of iTi ga•i ComprOhen3.ve Plan • policies, and Ommenity Develo mt Cs' a reciiiireffleetet6 the review of this proposal., 3. Goal 19 (Rconomy of the State) is sate. Pied becau0e the proposed redeeignaton would not affect the ''City'r inventory of developable' connmercial; land but would instead affect only the types of , comercial may be ubject sited activities: that m� developed d Qn the e 4. Goal 112 (Transportation) ie partially eatiefiedbecauae the proposed reties gnat ion . would allow devel�P t of intent ve dW North Street W 125th' Avenues collecto r ceotmrenneetxc b along• a maior Scholl! Fer iY Road, et iteintereect iS oan l wusiteh s serving developed 'reeidential areas within.'the cities'of Tigar and Beavirton. Thus, the redeeignation and subsequent development of the alts• .may' prove convenient for thQ residentsa of neighbor.ng areas that might make use of eervicee to be proviclezt on the, site that are not..presently available in this area: GoaLl 12 however, alsorequirea, that transportation safety be c�heidered as part ci land.uee decision making. Ail clescribed fvtther under Plan polic'�lee 8.1.1 and 12;.2:1'.. balcw, the proposal ?or> redea .gnat'ion of , this site to General Comrnercia,:i /C -G raises significant traffic concerns. in the neighborhood of the site, especially with regard; to SW. North Dakotas' Street as it aeeee ton: eion p eubdivi ; rau h the hn `mark.. iTAFF REP OO RT CPA 90- 4003 /ZC 90- 0001 RIT15E PETtOLB r,� r 4 taf f has ?etermirsed that the.` proposed Plan Map/Eon ng Amendment , ie . only partially conm',iatent with the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings below: • Plan Policy 2.1. g i+s' sati.sf ed ' because Neighborhood Planning O-e.Rnisstion ' #7 and surrounding property owners ' Were given notice of the public hearings related to the request and their opportunity, to comment on. the proposal. 2 • Plan Policy 4.2.1 will be satisfied through the development ' review, and building Permit processes at which time a develop ent proposal 'for. this Site ,must be fakesa to comply with applicable federal, ` State, and regional water quality requ'. ements including preparation and implementation of a non -Point source pollution control plan , in compliance with the Oregon Environmental Quality Ccimnieeion's temporary rules for the Tualatin. River basin. The proposed redesignation does not , by itself affect compliance with this Plan policy. Plan Polic y 4.3.1 is implemented through the developmen : review Process i n which building Placement and landscaping are revie®wed , with; respect to minimizing nriise impacts of a developing use upon neighboring land uses. 4. Plan Policy 5.1.1 is not affected since the proposed redesignation of the site would maintain the site's ,potential for commercial developments, althou h under... the pZopoeed C--G zoning 'designation pane. 9 � .� different conmtercial. uses 'would be permitted with different types of p to the current C -P zoning. job compared om as ob �p�rtunitie�;� created . as c 5,. .. Plan Policy 5.1.4 s satisfied because the propose ed rcae signation would not 3nvolyQ: commercial . encroachment into an existin existing g � 9: commercial Plan and sening desi;�nations would be replaced with other c ial designations. . Plan Policy 6.6.1 calls for buffering brzt1.4een different land uses as well as screening of service areas and fecilitiee. This !,olicy is i. nplt mented through Crsle Section 18.100 which ' lo conside ed in the reviraw of development" appli,catl.ons. The subject site ia; large enough potential g be able their facilities in the C-G Zoning district should tooat atL th fires aili on the sites whit providing appropriate to means oftland�" Fe buffering ! swine and visual sca and ��creenin� to r,�duce not im p acts on the ad aceit d evelo pe d Pro pe rj c es., 7.4.4 . and 7.. 0. are satin _7 a plan ' Policies 7.1.4, ' 762.1., r � .. . �, d because 1 fl.+� e adequate ,public service capacities are available to sec ve future o, , the ®y f f . � its. Extension of neces$ary public facilities to serve the site are the responsibility of the developl :war. The City of Tigard notifies applicable public and private utility providers of pe f PP ons. develo; nt a lx.cati. STAFF -- CPi� '�0 0003 - 'REPORT /LC 900QOI .-' QRITISH PETRt��EUM P, GE • H +� atian" is nat sat • b sus the; • a. Plan � Policy 8..1. .i i could lead to develc►pmenc '.of uees, on' the'site9 which would' be exile ed to .attract aubctas tie4.l.y more` # traffic „to the site' than 'would be' expected with disvelcpe'hent under the" existing CoimnercL'al , -Prafeseional C -P) designat'iou►s. This ,, potentia;l' increased traffic;` , would Tieri d tc negatively rimpa' t: traffic' safety pan - nercbjr: street". ,As noted by the., Env�vineering �i;vieiont� �g�ie, concern` ie greatest, wit 'reard to ,SW forth' Dakota t eet through the Anton Park. eubdivi4on south' .of the site.' Concerns regarding , ::�taf f is volumes and tray r "i,c safety on SW: North, Dakota Street have previously', been raised b ► this neighborhood before the City Council and Planning.Coaission. The applicant' a Traf f is Ana1�y i a co.,0cludee' t1�at r eveiapan.ant of "''a_' vehicle fuei. nales/car w8;eh /convenience, store and "vetssr:in�►sy clinics 'on the site _ I afternoon pea::'',traffic would result : �.n ' drecxieaded rnoo intersection as compared to typical developanent ` uLde�:' .thy C -P zone. _ ee that • *the appl�icari,t' {a intended' ' ueees The Traffic Ana�:ye�Lr� s_ao conc,lud �' would have a mf�ni mal i upact on overall traffic on SW North "Dakota Street. Staff, hctreve^ fitr,e that `these cc'nclusions may fie "suspect at' beet and possibly may'.be ir_relevant with .r,spect tva future developsent of t��e 'site. First, ae the $��c�neering Dlvieio�n has pointed gout, "dev€tlopment of a eervica station cou'Ld lead to a greater' "traffi.c; , increase on North bakota Street than "that indicated by the,f guree in y , due to the' unique location of the site: there the traffic anal afa ie a risk that acme 'traffic Will be diverted f�eom other routed i ► order to utilize the eexvice etc ,_ . a�cion /convenience �atorre propoeecr for the site. w The applicants: Rezoning. A li on dwe110 pan the': lack of aervico stations' in Tigard yet -the app . cants m Traffic' weet+arn aly®fe.' app gently ignores the ,lack of ;Service etationsa� a g alternate routes and .therefore i® able •to �'''ro" ect little �craff c to P rY the site other than drive -by traffic on SW Scholl per Roa ?,� Staff believes that a ee*_vice station at • thin site would be Lficant- traf f is atractor for motorists oa ;SW l let Avenue leading` • ��:hem to utilise SGd Werth Dakota street thxough the Ant,bn 'Park nubditieion.; This Could increase *raffle,. 'hazards Within this' establ shed` ✓ esidential neighborhood: 'Second, the traffic anaiysib.'could be irrelevant because it looks Only at the th reticel traffic generation: of the need the applicant •currently intense to develop; on "the site' rather than looking at the variet of ldr be: evelo on y Udell thi�t ceyui�d ha peed the site if the redesignation ie, approved. ±do ae is ;provided` with a `Plan Amendment /Zone Change that it'd Will ult °' teiy Lie' developed as ' currently intended. Ownership 'trs di intantiuno cast chang6i. Therefore, traffic analysis for such a >ropo ®al should look at' the range of possible creed under the proposed designations. A Last food ...aurant which also could be develo n on n i" peed ion the site ✓ est y changed to C G,, could 1 ,tubatantiali affect traffic 'i ' the ar much greater ertent than the need- addrese(�ad in the applicant'e.Tr. Analysis. The applicant's Traffic Anal Iles assumes that the Bite wo �ld' have' direct access to 8W Scholl" Perry Noaad. Eowyver, waahin,t **in and the Oregon state Highway Di�?iaioli sugg+eet that direct ' ' ce • • itEPO y 001 I�RYTYS� iyE i *t.1 # STAFF R'1' Scholia should be prohibits traffic on 'North Dakota' signal. ree ich ,wou, and therefore creased LLdela additions' he traf f: 'Ian Policy 8.1 : 3 t ill be e? tisf Led as a condition oaf appr�hval of r a►n' f�ititure develorxn, ent of thy® site. Completion ei necei►aihry street improvements along the cite' a frontages would he req�M red to be ®tal'ted by the deve in y eJoger at the time of development The Engincertng Division and the.,° Oregon State highway Division will reviei r any fttrkure development proposals for. the .Site. The locational criteria specified in .Chapter. 12 of the Comprehensive Plan are partially satisfied for the following reatcns: a. The Subject area is not surrounded by rasidentiai development on . more than two sides. Residential development exists on south . and west sidess of the site only. b. As discussed aibove under Statewide Planning Goal 12 and Plan, Policy 8.1.1, staff is not vpe ;suac'ed chat the pr000zed redesignation would not increase traffic on adjacent stre,iicts thereby increasing traffic safety concerns along these etrreeti. This potential increase in congestion as safety concerne,i'may exist a developed as the applicant an�I is y 3s Bevel ant inter�dai � i develop many � , ' i el if if the site should weld , ,n likely site Bevel with other uses allo the C-G zone. The r ropoaal fails " to satisfy this locationiil criteria for the General Commercial Plan designatioW .< a c. The site is located at the . intersection of an , arterial ani minor collector street. Access Ito the site will be determined in conjunction with the Oren State Highway AS-Vision through the development review process. d. Public. transportation i available scholia Perry Road. '' able 'on SW So its The site is an adequate size] to accommodate a variety of uses permitted :r, the C°-G zoning ' district. The site is highly visible from the HilidlOining streets. Com atibility of future nee' of the cite with' ald p � � �acent� uses ie difficult to acertain without an actual development , pr "oposa: :. Hotaever, the City of Tigard ° e Site Development Hilevies fiend Conditional Use p4,'ocesaes are Mended to provide an opportunity for rev ew of patential development's relationship with adjacent etietng 'uses. In order to approve a quasi-judicial amendment to the ''0l, \n and Zoning p y must also find that there id evidence -of a change :;in wW Ma n the city evdQnc neighborhood or community which y find tilat there has been a mistake j,o tirconel. ; e1cy a4eveu , the Cit "� meet. .,... rceia►t�anr~y . q � Y the original designation of tbe! parcel (Comprehe nsi've; P );an, 'Vaults" STAFF REPO$IT � CPA 90- 0003 /ZC; 90-0001 - _SRXTISH PE T> , ►LEZ Policy 1.1.1, Implementation Strategy • Comn;lunity Development Code Sect;i•an !18.2,4404'A)4-, ' The applicant • e Rezoning Applicatio :t ser asts tat a mistake was made on the Comprehensive Plan Map with regard: to the sltiortage of General Commercial designated properties -along the Scholls 7err�� core dory. The ycezoning Applicat.ioa states that the applicant's propos€ d uses ;!are' intended to help meet `the day -to -day need° of the reside:ntn of the s1urro1'nding ., neighborhoods r yet these particular gees ar��e not allr�:ted in _the zoning district that have been applied to developable props ties along this corridoa . The applicant.po %nts out that tl'mere arE� almost 400 single fa�mil�r homes within one - half mile of the subject ��,lroperty and at least tlta r o pa pp. n intense easae numbs f a rtments. the a licaants etat�e that thi�a ie a market for com mercia . uses that needs of the area's residents. The applicants state, however,,; that the Com r pensive Plan Map does not provide enough appropriately zonels) land toy .meet these needs . of the neig'nborho d. 6h1e from the a pp licant u viesSo int, a mistake ma y exist regard to the current Plan designations a in that Ha large market d w-mita Y h exist that • cannot easily be satisfied by the current inventory of properly zoned developable land, from a land use planning vi+ewpt"int other reasons. exist for net' trying to saicisfy every 'economic market dem'ind. The City of Tigard has pair: close attetion to the araou�c w of ;de ie1opable cotamerc a? ly g g Scholl° Ferry Corridor,;. a 40 has the City of` nd alon the eai rton. la . chosen to limit tha amount of I�ener "al Beaverton The cities .have ch ,Commercial properties in order to reduce traffic congestion along the highway, in order to reduce the appearance of. strip development, and in order to minimize traffic, noise and lighting impacts upon ourrounding neighborhoods. limitation upon General Commercial derignstions was not a m ace, hOt stead wa ®a corscioys decision to lim it tha anrunt o develo pab le� aercialproperties along Sct011s Ferry R000.'. The City o t Tigard has looked at several other prop... ,gals for redesignation' of ProPerties to the General Commercial and, Neighborhood Commercial Plan designations along the Scholla Ferry Corridor and the City k has consistently deni.cd those requests. On the property across, North Dakota Street from the subject ject s1te, the City Council denied a request to chang the zoning for commercial G,�G � 1985 0 � _ (C-P) �eQ) the entire ro rt from Commercial Professional i; to General ( ) (CPA 3 85 /ZC 85) . The Council. e decisions was appealed to the Oregon Land use Board of Appeals. The decision was upheld. The Council found that there was no evidence of a, mistake in the land tone designations for thii area; there was no overwhelming need for additional General Commercial designated lands in. concern with traffic g Dakota Street nand hdPicholla Fern Road. along a eLt for the ne change r Borth D Plan/zone property re�itiltecl in a mixture of A later Pla commercial, designations being aP` P ro v,.. . ed. The southwestern portion of the parcel retained the b,i Portion was designated General Commercial; and Yr. a 1 Plan and zone the nor designations; thweet portion designated for Neighborhood the onswas dee� . ,. . Under development nt (, h g bor�ood Cammercial use (CPR a 6) � This � is current with 10 S�+�tiC 13-8 Thee a�eighbaring site 'medical office tau building and : a ,, fast food ':restaurant. tA substantial . „ 1 - 'BRITISH STAFF REPORT � CPA 90- OA03 %ZC g0 =�00t� '.., f�I�t1I� PAGE ST PSTi3 IitG conclusion, staff does not find ti at 1► `ch�u ge .in circumstances has A occurred in the neighborhood of the ` unn'ingham pr. pe ty since the briginal' designation of the subject site w th the Processional- Com*erc3al {Flamm zone designations to support 'a charge to, Gen'eral iailercial at, . this time."'a In :addition , 'staff doss not find ?pitidence of a i mistake `in I,tie 'orig nal designation. Conversely, staff finch► that the' original . Cs eeiai'al Prct'essional designation ' was carefully conceivi�' and was :'intended tip f . minizaise ,the possible impacts upon adjoining land use's. and to aD ini ize traffic impacts at this congested ''intersection. The .existing 'Commercial g and t paroel cshould''': Professional T1an deei nation and C-P toning for the subject sjec be .maintained e RECOMMENDATION yfr he Planning Division recommends. that the Pl ning # ssioia f fors+ard a reronaimendation to the City Council for DENIAL o f Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 90 -0003 and Zone Change ZON 90 -0001, basso upon ; the foiMgoing findings. 90 -0003/ . aTA�F 'i�PbRT �cPh, �G' 90 009. - , ORIT!�C MT 714 111 GI 4 CIE mas PNIN 111111111111111 I "L n E, " WA 11118ffill I CT in 111111111111111 1.1=1 svl""L" $t114411" III fro Lr1 Prepared by: John N. Morgan, AICP February 12, 1990 Background . This repor will • . supplement . o, • of ATEp, Inc. it will augment the material dealing ' with The property is at the souttituest co..4‘•,ner of Scholls. Fetr'l South Dakota Street. Schools Ferry is a major" arterial while Souttl Schc-alls Ferry Road is included, in the Oregon State Department of Transportation's 6-Year 'Highway Irnprovethent 1?rcl.3ram for widerdng • • from two to four lanes. It i an€icipated this ork wiU be , _ The redevelopment of the subjiJot property be done anticipating • .•• . •. . • . • • ..... • • •• ••• • ••• •• .••••,•.• •• ,•••,• •• the Scholls Fervy project. Setback3, landscaping, arid access will eIincourr�a A • ( ; . 'fe', ; convdp cular area .'for° he Plcin 1)nticipates nei.ghborho; "poi commercial and . professional cornniercial uses, such as thce "veterinary ciinic and the adjacen t .da,. care center, to serve the sur ouncting population without requiring significantly long automobile 'trips. Neighborhood coninercial' 'uses are intended to be convenient an provide, for the day - to- day.' need stirrounaing population. This S1 ' Oil development i s also intended to help meet ,: the day: day needs of the surrounding pt.Ilation. 'riQwever, t y y.virtue theses ; ses not lei rig al i Muted s n "tit*. Neighborhoo C+onnn rci • • Profess io lal Commercial Zone, t'hi.`,s ton change i.s `necessa "'fit . PAGE , : ZONE ' CHM' these types cif ne are artier'. in he that serve the ..day t'o --day needs of the res dents . The' comprehe i save Plan uvtsely 1de,txfi.c a pxbIc .needtop rovide` l.and o ese, types of neighborhood commercial activ'iti'e$ within ,the n igt oor, hoods they are:. i n} dec to serge,. Moweveru t. does not'.' pro�ri enough appropriate.'ly` zoned band to meet.he need.: The E' ` Oil proposal is intended to m.,aet t� a .same neighborhood day'— needs as the uses typically .a slowed with the Neishborhood Commercial zone. However, the zoning ordinance,' bpi virtue o, excluding ser'.:.ice stations in neighborhood commercia',l.?zones doe: not allow this to occur. As well, the zoning m0p, by not allowvin enough appropr i at eJ y' zoned land . to meet the need, dads not; al low this to occur. The service station o'l" ti � �� p�:•ov�de ga.��., �ne� and os,l. products, as well ae automobile servic ea 'le ca r )wash wil be convenience to the area residence . The mina = rr alr i1 prov i limited groceries ' 'thin easy walking '` istani ;e of r4sid ►nt w the neighborhood. address t through i.s pecial tiesi n requirements, or. throi service stations a conditiona use ` "'' ' it f 3P' Oil intends to design , an ' construct th'is:. facility , so n attractive, com atible P art t�f� �� thy: neighborpao d. rot i d en needed , tlay -to=gay s, rva c neighbor `r" residen den; Much greater ex tent than the P" o fessional CommerGia1� zone uiott a,�' Since the Comprehensive Plan through tY'le 'zoriing r.:' � g c�rdrdance�, err e,`+ in not providing for these types o'f uses as, part of the zoni^ "nr, pattern oaf the area, the zone change is necesSa Access to the subject Property call be substart.t,;ia' through the redevelopme.nc of the p ro � psi "t , Gs ,ilEfi 11 � Y X ��` i'� cons the pending � �zning o Sch ols Ferry Ro ( !� ,�%.; �Y,? ,.. <N,�?le �ihiCS+:6�.: ��. 3.A `�)ti'�,.r: U' 1�t..,),yE S Ini�i �: v ➢di1 i �i 'C `y rvx � x nv el. ghboY, 7 ;0c) ommerc1' +teZ? 4. :fait. a "� f s ja'��rt ;F „h i' �?�,` L a .:4� y{+"♦r .. r:� .,,+t'�t ,Fi' r+r t..., S..rt �ti, +.. �� t..' � ��,.. h:;�i '1 t PREPARED BY. MSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 4040 DOUGLAS' WAY LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 90 =3 FEBRU 'RIP GENERATION ;TR P ! STRIBUTIO EXISTING `11-EVE "' r �OENARIO 2 ° EXIST ,ING TRIP GENERATION TRIP DISTRIiBUTIO RAN/SIT C ONSIDERATIO M MENDATION A� I- ■1 RANSPORTATION ANALYSIS 1 BP OIL CO. LOCATED IN P.D, OREGON This impact analysis has been conducted to .::. n and future >:. the exists evaluate v � .......... ........ and ea ,�d e n a traffic operational needs of the City ty, of fa rd s transportation system based on the potential • ' street system. The 'f 38 acre site rt+ 'on the surrounding see sy impact �f the BP Oil Company props ,Y g is bounded on the north by SW SchoIls Ferry Road,on the east by N.Dakota Street and on the west and south by th the site is bounded b residential development. Figure 1 shows the vicinity map ..,.. of the proposed development. The theme of this transportation analysis is to assess the transportation impacts from the development of the subject property on the surrounding street network based en two different Icenarios First, the impact of development of the property under existing conditions will be established; Second, the fm act of development of the property with the proposed development will be analyzed to determine what difference there may be on the transportation system. The format used in this ?eport was established during meet ngs with the City of Tigard, ODOT and the applicants representatives. pecifi issues this report include: U tatoves. S c: traffic rela�.ed issues discussed in this re rf Inc �� Trrrfc analysis for the study area. Existing gyred use and traffic conditions in the Prot 'ect area. Proposed land use and future traffic conditions in t a n the project area, i p yp • Oil property. Trip B P ®il tom_. an co .. ..mates for the e Tn Generation est� • 5ite access locations and operations: Safety considerations at the site access locations include hg, but not limited to sigh distance analysis, , needs. tuil i lane and channelization rtes Traffic impacts on 'surro ling streets. This report was prepared using the latest land use and , transportation data available from the , applicant, the city of Tgard (hereafter referred to as City), Metropolitan Service District (METRO), and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODC; )• ASS EPJ &PLAN ING ►TEP PAG OCI�IT�D YRAi�SPURTI�`�ICtN EN�IiVE • • • • Y :' • • • '.• • • • C •: •'• • • 44, 4, •: • • • • . •••••• • :,•, • • ••L,• • • +•• • la • • • • •L •• 01 •i IfL I/1 ;II •i i.. • i Y 1 •',• • • s• •,i • 'i °: is ••••• r._••.,.••.. ■ tu ANENINN•Rsiwiwiwilimmriatim- Awn •ice .:1::�:: :.rJ :'l::•' .� J:•:itiC• }'r%o:ti;:•: f:Vi�.��:i4•:;i: { :: i� :� �: i• :�:YJ:. {.Y. \'Jl •.�r �. DOT for the Scholls Hwy widening project 8:30 a.m. and the evening peak hour W -from our counts, the p.m. peak' F,eriod was traffic impact at the inter ectia ^s in the stun ►,rn g `; and. ". ei►F ;Wing pe, . ne nt traffic counts were n. Pa IGo.. n. the, 0.�_ t�.t d ace n P ns.a rsecho ,� 1 and along key arterials ,in the area' by �e nu)n ing peak hour was found to be 7:30 to to 5 :30 p.m.. Upon review of these peak rot in LYI w unin a e etermined to be the most critical time in .terms .. o area. The operating Characteristics at each of the key signaliz y J and unsignalized intersections during the Oak periods were examined using the methods outlined in the. 1985 Highway witty I� � Mas�ixa utii� ing the Highway Capacity Manual Software. The operating characteristics examined included the average vehicle delay, v^ u ie to 4 party (v /c) ratio,' level of service, and estimate queue length. I I I i criteria used for the intersection analysis included the guidelines set forth by Washington County. These guidelines state that each . signalized intersection analyzed should ;operate at a Level of Service (LOS1r •t .95 car le' See tables Service P ty ss� D with a volunne� to ca act (�r /c) ratio of 0 through 4. ASSUMPTIONS Site Access Points Access points for the BP Oil Company Ole under existing and proposed zoning differ such that traffic patterns will not be very much Under existing milk's, only one access point exist: along N.Dakota Street, and no Oral-5 point exists along SW v c holy Ferry Road. i zor to be located on SW Scholls Under the proposed zoning a �.�� 3��cess has been ..assumed Ferry ,...;. Ftoad approximately 240 feet west of N.Dakota Street. See Figure 1. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS AS.� SUMPTIONS in order to analyze each intersection, there were certain cornmon ' made. � These m ions on assn assumption., in general, are as follows: 1. Traffic signal ti mings were modified torn existing tirni s to ' op timize intersection operation: Modifications indUde both changes in indivi;duua phases and cycle lengths. : Peak lour factors used bised 'on exacting• traffic counts were 03 to 0.95 for the azd 0: far file a.m. peak° ASST TED TFtANSP�Q►RT`�1TI N EN INEEItING+ & PIA iNING (ATEP) PACE e' 4 .peg s 1 mewl to dw' 7i i ruck percentages used in urrling ro�o�► -rnent counts. e analysis were 1 ase±d on ihe'tiuc counts performed "dun . Each intersection opc\rates as an isolated : intersection. PROCEDURE ANALYSIS P l! INTERSECTION S • . r an 'frhe. a m.a r different traffic. scenarios o t The analysis of the intersections included two peak periods. These scenarios include: PE I I E ist:* g Conditions with ' Existing Zoning ea, c (Existing Zonin ng Conditions + BP Oil Company Traffic I!Propo md Zonin, \•i .u�..� •rur.. r r ..ti�:1Yi: Yii! P.1 'iii'• r Bas�:d on the analysis found later in his report, the ,following findings are made: The property Y u nder the existing zoning o ene r 'ate , approximately 426 dal y trips (2w1i3 roundtn• ps). 'During the afternoon pe* hours a Prox, mate � 54 tw.)7loyft vehicle stn sll the proposed site drivewa s." occur at p pa y The BP Oil Company property,, afull build ,is ex Pei ed g ene ra te a Ppr0x imately 1, 860 daily trips (930 round, trips). During the afteoon peak hours approximately 80 ,,two-way, vehscle trips will occur at the p Po sed sit e d .,+;■?.ways. ihe pm property' is, expected d to generate approximately 26 More •rips dining the afternoor) peak than the ex stir ►;g zoning. ly � pr©poOy ` rep ared usi .. _ has be3n p, p g _ P ' traffic analysis for the BP • • • �Ty�s by Oil CorYipany� �'� a eve O riven scent represents a higher level of development than currently { e,dsts. - I y o p ,rat�n� The ew !Un g 'road re twok system item wth in �6 e study area s current unacceptable levels of, service. Capacity defidendes oxdst dunn the a: 'period at'- ci Scholl( and N.Dakota. This capaciity deficiency, pertains o the inade,quate n:ber of lanes g y �f large umber of vehic atre�:tw along SW Scholl( Eerr Road to �ccorr�moa9dte �ihe la e n es. mas The impacts an the street system of the BP Oil Company proposed zoni g are not significant. grope under either exittin ASSOCIA ED TP�� SPORTATIO ENGiNEiE dNG & PLANNING ATEP) PPAGE A• 0 • C '•V .�.:,►.:,v:.::.; ..` .. ..: •;.; • ' '�:i�ti��'ti;irt�:,irie5�'iwa� ±i siwir;i�.lif' The study . area has been determined' based on guidelines. recommended .in conversations with C -� the City of . .��T and •th 'ty Tigard . Staff. � � ne ;�p�uideiines' state. that, � if the ratio of sitelerierated traffic to a sting traffic on a given link is greater,`than 10 percent, then thi: link is invaded d by the site and intersections on this lir'ik should be analyzed d. Based on this guidelines and discussions with the City of Tigard, the following intersections were anal yze1: 1) SW Scholls Ferry Road and N.Dakota /125th Avenue. Additionally, the driveway access points identified by the BI G l Company propo qI were included in the analysis for future road maitions SITE CONDITIONS 411N1l ADJACENT LAND USES SW . G, Road rand N �► holls Ferry oa The property in question is located on the Southwest Corner of Dakota and presently has a veterinarian office in inverted single family dwelling. The existing building is to be relocated to the rear of the j n; erty with the service station to be located on the front 'portion of the property,. The property it bounded by residential properties to the east and south and would be a conditional use in the proposed zone. • 'EXISTING' ritOADWA_YS w� Scholls Ferry Kc,�3d is a m or a ,st wes14 link throng h t, ` porti ,. / �. g ity ± gird and hss on `t► a n. w descried as an M jor strut in t Ti arils •et • hp Tr n�oort��tian Ee�ement of tl e � C!t°� of g h T Comprehe�ilsive Plan. SW Scholls Ferry Road, links iiviy 2b at the Sunset c;ortio . with Tigard r e •y g �, 2. lane are' ��i with lett. horn and R�aav�rtor� asr the South ar*� st :The xrstia�i: �aadwa �s a ca. lanes at major intersections. SW S�hoils Feary lRoa d is ex eceto r e cors t rir cted d unn` ' next two, years to a 'five lane major arterial •aaadway left u0n pockets 'and signals, 1f the 'major intersections, Dakota is a desi nated Minor Collector St fro � Street, Fe ° Road ee�i that flows, .:: .. m as commercial areas of SW Greenberg Road 00 the east, Ns Dakota is generally a two lane section with parking allowed on bath sides 'of the stteet, 4 ISS "" "*�IA`TED �RAh1SPCIRI`�►T6C�N .E��GINE�t�INC� Rr � C". vftt Mw 4 • 1 4, d. O 4 , 4" rip b EAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUM Ah i ► taPEltl`iTIC) S ,: 5- 1 . ' nducted at ttrre" Morning and edenin peak hour turrning `'rnovernent traffic counts were, co ey wto g� evening. intersections . listed above by ODO F Thes ''Intersections are adjacent to the BP I Company { . 'o and along key arterials in the at The in peak., hour was found to be 7.30 to was : rn � U n re�ievi� of ts�e peek' 8 :30 a.VA. and the evening peak" I;:cur was from .430 to 5.30 p po our traffic counts, the pm pe s P was de��nrrrined to -be, the roost cn`ti time in wterrn� impacts as the intersectior�,'s in the study;Area. do adjustments-to the ' olunnes have of traffic i p cts for ,seasonal vanations in traffic volumes: Figures 2 and 3� show the laeeerz made to account i m. and .m. peak hour traffic volumes t intersections ;n the stud/ ai ea �.x�stt, rg a. �► Pe the .�.ay TRIP GENE kATIO>t TR Estimates of total tal daty ae m. a n ,! p m: peak hour driveway vo6urr�es for the existing sang uses were developed from empirical observations at rhan si5nlar -sided facilities located th rou ghout e United States. These empirical observations ,ark, su.nmarn ed in a standard reference manual pul3lished by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, and are supported by adi ational independent studies conducted by both the California Department of TranspoMta4on and the P Arizona Departme. d. oi' Trans p rtatii . • is trip _adds that will be generate e3 b+ r the propesed developrnen t Estimating the number of vehicle trlr �, g � is of rime in rt K ai a in order to accurately assess the impacts of develor rnent on the 'raid p Is'Q network. Two basic procedures are available to . traffic engineers for estimating the number a dr`i' w �y vehicle trips generated be propose d but not _y et -existing develop, eiert; , - similar facliu * field studies conducted at other si Apply a;v�era • r 1, plaly� gc�s oh +sewed t ro are available for t►��s information located thro�ig*iout the United States. A number of sources ..� .., '1 which is publ�shee`` by the • • to of _� a ns � � including �!D � -n .E. aria � r � �al�ri�Ynia Transportation Engineers (ITE); and summary trip a �eralion repot h; prepare' by the Depert neat of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, and other public • ,� � in e�� ern the trip transportation agencies. All of these sources provide eac..,allent guidance in t una, g s various land uses, but ob�u take acou �t w l ,� al"�" do reel . � the ��►ets of loi-a generation rate.. for v�trcQ a�.. 1 conditions and uniq ue c�ara�en st� cs of the propoeed land use. 2 . Observe throug h field studies ire actual trip generation 'characte s its of other s eilar and existing developments within the "local area. Procedure one ate3ve . used in the deve emcnt of this report . ��,a.m. , a . Table s ov, s e ends h nt zoning c n a dal �. .. h•c;e trip ends to be generated �.oy t .. g and p -m. number of ve r p � nua peak hour basis based on the mathemauca g Jr) equatJ)nc, deveb Ise d on trip ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION EN3INEERINf3 r d "9 .4 � r r • VI ' • • 4464'444'444.44 ii-44 •Y. •••• Y • . a '` • .• ..' • • • • • • • Y • 4. 1 4 Y . • • yi • • • Y / • • r-- generation rates at similar sites throughout the United States and found in Section 540 ref the Trip Generation Manual (4th Edition). For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that none of the Fro: e- related person trips will be made by mass 'transit. This assumption is considered Ito be .appropriate since even though Tri-Met provides service to within about one- quarter Mile of the site. Further, assuming no transit ridership results in a worst-case scenario. l for traffic impacts to the street system. Table 1 - Projected Trip Generation For Current Zoning essiof TRIP DISTRIBUTION :T �: �7:• T, ��1,'.•?:?; r?:', 1 •T•�`1;� }•T•;T,.T,.,.T,r,R:6:•. ■ ((ii��T3R ppp■■ ■Cr ,.'YS�. The distribution of generated trips ps ontothe roadway system within thin the site ar-ea was determined by by reviewing the existing distribution at the main street intersections and the distribution pattern determined by METRO using the EMME2 traf is model. Figures ures 4 and 5 show the estimated site-generated t distributed estimated g traffic d�strabuted to the yurroondirrg rcad system. The site - generated traffic shown inr Figures 4 and 5 were combined with the existing traffic velurnes shown in Figures 2 and 3 to arrive at the total traffic for the property undor the existing zoning for the a.m. and p.m. peak periods shown in Figures 6 and 7. LEVEL OF SERVICE terms . The p � key in the peak hour traffic . rat��s ", in ter, rns of levels of service, at the. ke inters f�a o p intersections study area were examined with procedures descriI e J in, the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 2) Level of Service (LOS) is developed the ,. s w # a conce�.� that wz�s eve; o to measure how driver perceives the conditions surrounding them as they travel through a signalized intersection or roadway segment. This degree of perception . i es such elements ... � eg. � include � as trivia! ttrrre, number, ., .. o . la ....nd im dances caused b l ,originally of stops, tot;�l amou�►t of stopped delay, a pe y other vehicles. As defined by the 965 Highway Capacity Manual six grwdes are used to denote the various LOS; Using this dettrnt�o�t; it is en�, " g . � � :- . �. � � agreed that D�`' LOS is these rides are shown in Table 2. g generally g . � ra a r the minimum acceptable for an urban area. ASSC C.�IA,T.D TRANSP ►RTATION EN NEERiN(3 & PL'A�NN .,1 Fr1 L NG (STEP) PAG t • 44 4844 •:aai:•..':•iti �:i: •: ii; r i :, : '. • ,• ": • : ,i 6' i 4 4 4,6 • .,. • 1 Y: ,: • •.., , 4 • 0 4,4 e, • 4 4; 4 a; , ' • 4 4 • • • i4 ,4 a'. • 0, 4',0 '44 b • • -4' 4,4 4,4 • k a • 4 4 4 4 •a • .4 a • ffE* • 4.4 • 4 4,4 . 4 4" 4 4.4 • ": • a; • 4'4 4 4. 4 • 4 6 4 '4 1,;•,,.• • a 4 4' i 4,4 4, • 4 4; " • • 4,4 ;:;. • .44;4 4; 4444.446 .11 ail ,,V11, k 4,14 11, 1, a a 111 11 6 la 111"a 11, • 11, 4 '4 4,4 4' 4 • a.. a 4 • • 4 1 4 4 4; 6 4, a a • • • 4, 4 • ..",•` 4 4 issumeaanonsr . Lo fO sgnahzed usgiyerali Table '2 - Level Of Service ; Definitions' (Signalized Intersections; tr`r SeaR1 .1 rssi :•�.� �:v�;� Yi':•ih:, !.Y! D.R! :.Y.4:!•17:•: T' *r::T.• ....*.� ��l':: T:r.':•: �.:T..��.:•,i T�TT� �:T.�,.;. ,., �1'i•: .! ,1„ el"�`�e �n�llu� rrr� �'�s, r� or nrsti � t. t some +cornbin�ti, + ur ► . ra R tessa ,longer cl `Qns, { �` �D >ae� of re i it s I fl rF• S•h✓ •: !v , . q�•4111��sf is ate. �`ession, long `cy le lengths,; a:ent o curreri ::�• ■Y. M` +0111 • • T'':•:•:�T!'�T T •i•`RR�.T.T.T. T.::i7P -TT T'-- •1T'T,.rrTTi'i �T,•,�T,I;�, ..1,,. ^.T, :T �'.�'S' '.T, ,:;i•,:. }1;r • 1. •:K' 'r{v .'It, 1 by ,rG: i t t =:dry{ 1`I rs ots 1. ,.:i ,. 1t .n I~srdere� to be �� .� ��:.t�,:.. ,�. :.. ,�,r .�. �Ir : i�;� �:�t, �,rr' t:a�d. : i.i� 't ,tl �ut, hl�v. ;yz; :1. r e •�c� .t£�� +t� ••te'• 1 � � s arar e�.. .,Cd • of` � o rs.o '��rert(u`v�it can o.��1�r� .,+:at�,va :•1 a<• :• , iti f �• r� r r 1" � P al :•i5� �P nA. ■ l � 5w � . � .7�;i;iilR!!►.��4I��.:.• :.;l;R t .,�, t hS Y t� 1. �V •Ah: :, .,;...„.6,... ,.tv :•t. .I: �;•t :� �i' i2t;•: �:i• {.: �i��j iji { {i >�,•`•: <js {� {:;;i �i;i; {;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;2::;i., •;:,,,,; i ?itir { + :::{�rF{:Y {4� +� {I:� {ii {iii; �i { {i��'r`�:�;: � :.............. ii {I {I; >Iwv0.I+e� - - tiiEi'it•• ..... ............................. ..tt:':'r.Yi:':e'i:S: ?4:. :•:.:• ,. .,.., t 1 ... .._... ..,..t.... ........ i . ,. r ..... iroURh m '' ASSOCIATED `I NSPORTA11ON NGIh EEi NC & 'IAN NiNt dA`TEP . PACE 1 ter, ui'ti1:u u.se�•��:LJi I. '*iii:iiiii:i:"."'.::44':'iii:1:::;.: cenario two includes development of the BP Oil Company propert is nario v,;ould change 'Aim a casting zoning 'essio ia1. nd BP Oil .Co. to operate a sera ce station under a IL. id opal ,u The • proposed development consists of a 11 pump of approximately COO square feet and a On le eve The convenience store is d signed to service 'the custo ne s rfr rn the sere . s car wash. Te he station will give discounts '! on car washes if ;the vehicles bu as Y is designed to handel one car at a time arid is rw t designed as :a high volume ess into the sit t under this scenario wou Road, and iN.l�` • ' akota approx��nat�!ly 1 one lqn See Figure Icont NOTES: A. cSF =fs gross "eas &ble square feet B. Includes both inbound and outbound trips C. Assumes that 40 percent of the trips attracted to the �nnvonience pnrtidn of the geidimeamil. and 58 percent of the trips attracted to the peMce sta, !repreFent drop-in trips or b -pass trips by vehicles that are already on the adjacent road system. As allowed by the y ; P y Blow �" remaining new Trip Generation .. page '� er�n� � an, on . ��at all Manual � 4th Edition) a e 1 ®, this als® assun��., diverted vehicle 'cle trips are new to the site. assumption a ' studies published in the This aSSUr'n $9lBn 0S 'on ►��E Journal This reduction accounts for trips that would otherwise be double counted because they road stem. These trips include stops made by persons i A the system. � � ns eroter�ng or the an,' a►,Ye�►��l on tt re . .- leaving nearby commercial and residential property, and by persons. whose Omar/ destination is to other commercial areas. For the pail •''° St;S of this analysis; it is assumed that none of the home-related person trips will p ignores the recent roe ons that 1-5 percent of all be made by mass transit. This assumption r 1,�Y�� t home ,a.' �ed rs ®n trips for purposes unrelated ases to work Will Made, by transit. There... fore. , G Wayne Ka and La to n t T. Evaluation of Slopping Cent r Trip l , , iTE lourna Volume 57, Nu 2) Fairoary 1987, Made, Louis J. and Grove, Fredrick E., "Reduction in Estimates of Traffic 1. -;�pac of Regional Shopping Canters" !TE oG: ' ,._► 1; January 1981, ��Pg 16. �al� Volume 51 Number Smith, Steve10 A., "' 1 Mel',hodology of Considering Pass - h°r` Trips in Tr ,f Imr, ct Analyses for Shoppiri Centers" —EE,. r3urnalr,, Volume 56, Nwnber 8,, Pg. 7. ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION �TA TION Er s"�� ING (AMP) PAGE J ogures ,and 9 show . the ,estimated site - generates 4 1 ysterna The, 'siteYgeneratec tra ac si gn in Figures; traffic vole es shown in. Figures 2 and 3 arrive rat the proposed zoning for ,the a.ra. and p.m. peak, isin buted' to the surrounding : s,iti ad 'were combined with the existing'; al traffic for BP Oil company under own in Figures 10 and 'i 1'• peak" our levels of Aervice were determined at the intersections within the study area for the n of the BP Oil Company property under proposed zoning plan designations. `6'aEie de�elc►p�ne , t � Y p � di tes 'I that the intersections within the, study area will function at an adequate Yevel � and indicates oJ► service except the non - signalized intersect once Table 6 - Scenario 2 ee l o f SeMce a ritual: E• O • 'n•: r:• }: 1 l • 7•:• 44 4 4 r 41 �Aa The. BP Oil Ccrxmpa∎ ly ^properly►, i� cu Opp •• •'4 :• ,• \,•:•' ,..444:,•: •' ::,'•': • : r :•:••:4•:44'::.'x'.•::: :.:`:: :: 'P • ,,,� • . :.•. :• ••'::4::•..:44,: • : •.:•::. \.. •`. 1:;11 };: }li:S:.•,'r d ?r$ •r' 4 t YM y r ve • 'W hich r� s :Ll;l vS 1 4:1111 _�Ct�l ''rll:'• � 151.•.•r:::•.•. ►' fill ` v$ 1i d e d :.•,,..,.... •.,.. ''Vi'''i :'; r:4: { r�7� r ;.p;. ' {';:•1 •; {.: i.:, •:• ;1:1 V" �l G� pfd 4111 :'M1 !as L1• i44:' q Highway. 'he buss run headway during the morning (6 :00 ant to 9 :00 am) and `i 5 minut headwa and 7 :00 between (4:0o p an 7:00 p�ni: . ,.,. a• y i' , L. � • • • : ". i • • • • • -• • • • • • "1 . .. 4 • ••i,.• .�,.. •�• . . . .'L • • • • • . . • L . • ••• i • ■•.i • LL •.• . i • • •: } to, • •i • , • •• • • ♦ • •' 'a•• •• • i • • • • • i ••••.• . • ♦ • • •• • i • • L ••i i • '• i•' .i •• Y • L • • • T • i• • ••• • -• •} L a • .: • • • • • • • l •. • • i • •..i• • • • • {. 'L L' • i i • • -• •. • •• • . 6 A • •. r • .• • • 4 • • i '• + • • i to • • • ..• • • • L'• i • •,• • • •.• LL • •.:•.. • .•'••it �. •••L'•.:i. • • • • • i,L • •• •• Y • • • • • 1 ♦ 1441 • • +• + • • +•••Y o • E+ •+ +•+. •••• •: 'i • i • 4 • :• Y • • • a 1 3. ♦ • • • • • ♦ • • • • • •''iii • • • • ii • • •.a • • •. •. 1; • •i. +. +• • • .1 ::• i . • •:iii 7 • • • •••YY n.• 4 1 i • • Y :1. Y i • • • 4'16 • • • • • • 1 h ti . • • • • Yi• • • • •' • • • • •x �'• • . x •i•. -•, i • •,• is . . 4•• i • . • • • i fix• . :I• E•:•• •i CbY i • .•:: • II •4.4444: •. ...4:44 x. ••,. 4 1 44• x •• 4 • .4 •• 4. •• 4 Pie development of the BP Oh .' c9 parry peroperty , under the proposed Zonin Zoning Plan pattern will not severely impact flie surrounding = street system. The proposed zonins will generate approximately 1,81SO : trips per day ( ,approximately 985 of the tr are by pass trips that are already on the roadway), The proposed zoning g v✓ill generate approximately 875 new trips per day. The proposed zoning would, . generate approximately 79 trips during the pm peak 'hour ( 41 trips in and 3f1 trips, out g ' g would generate approximately 426 trips per day. The proposed ��onan wo The existing - . zoning would generate approximately 54 trips during the pm peak hour (9 trips in and The proposed zoning will generate approximately 25 more trips rP' ring ,the pm peak hour than the existing zoning. The inclusion of a convenience store into the proposed development requires that the trip rates for a convenience ::ore be used. These trip rates are considered for a free ce store a convenience store associated h a service station standing conve�oen and not � eoa�ven� - t • These 'stores usually are served by the customers for the service station and very 'little traffic is generated outside of the service station. By using a free standing 'convenience store tri p genera tio n g reatly exaggerates the actual number of trio generated by this type of development. The existing zoning would generate more trips 1.9 the :gout nco the neighborhood than the proposed developm nt. �':e s type of development relies very heavily on existing i hi is , only _ . _ `on in the area, many of the ex sting vehicles o traffic. Since th es is th`. ce stair or►.� serer both SW Scholls and on N. Dakota w ll use this facilif y. Very few vehicle's nlp travel great distances to use this facility T� i . 4. �e Road to a five lane i i the rr�cpr�a�ement of SW S�holls �� rry secntan r 1951 III greatly improve traffic flowS in the area. ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & ,I llhl i -: :ti�JT y.r<<., ., �il: R:• g•:+ CX�•,: 9., M,.MYR;:;:,9,:WN!:,T,,��X;;R }, . #;4��3� +Q tr lr1.. • rri '' {' {'.: {Y$':; iJ pL y {ti ? Y?f: qv* men o vcr ev °IcafNG [J4' w'a1M RETAIL , MARKETING DESIGN AND ENGINEERING 200 PUB ` ZOARE CCEVEI ND OHIO .44114 SCHOLLS FERR "it�L�� b�;K�' [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]