The URL can be used to link to this page

CPA 89-07 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. or the That X r se ^ue�� nrrtace cif ,the ` iga odnOii f which thy, attachad is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) ',Upon each,►f' t e. fol, co arod named per zcns on the day of mailing to eac a tE�em a.t thio &dd ee s s shown on the att *ched Exhibit: notice' is hereto attacraed, and desposited in the United States, Mail on the .: t�repared. Notice Jcr•4 �;d..artd sworn to before me this a �a Notary Public of Oregon My Commission E: pires Subscribed and sworn 'to before me his t otary Pu ' .ic of mec c a My Coo nissicon Expires s ZIT! , OF TIGARD Washington County,: Oregon?.' NOTICE OF ORDER 4 BY CITY Co UncIL Name of Applicant: Criterion �:eitie ▪ Add:,:eea 150 0 One Main Pl. 101 SW ' Hain St. City Portland State OR Zip 97204 • Addre = a of Property: West nid2 2£ rW 7,2.nd} Avenue, between SW Varna Street and SW Fir Strae`,_, Tax Map and Lot ; No (s) .: 281 31DB tax lots 4, & 801 2S1 1DC,,z;,_�, , s . ]Lot 3600 S+, Request: A re gent for a pLTyaal. o' ,_a, Con siee. Yian.. r+endment from .L. racial. Pro:�e , ai. t+e Medium - Ra.°'� y_ •eee3:d. ►rat .al sad a Zone Chan e f roan C-.P d Cea �max:e �,;,,�,,,,�rci.a7 Professional to .. R.-25 BIIteeiderntial �5 re units a E: O�P � .I� � � ZONE: ..�. � Co�acaercial e Action: It Approval as recuested Approval with conditions Denial Notice: tc.Notice p p per, Posted y 1, and • was published in the Wawa a eted at C.fc Bail The applicant and owner(e) ?� Owners of record within the required distance The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization lc Affected governmental agencies o DECISION S, D OM December 11 l98 aE�EFFECTIVE ON � ll 1S90 The adopted findings of fact, decision: aax.d Statement of conditions can e obtained from the Planning Department, . Tigard O .ty 1. +31,15 SW Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. A review of this decision malr be obtained bY ''in ►ti ce ,of filing with the Oregon Land use Board of Appeals LTTSA en c�s to ��: H1��idi�g' t{.� t�Twi'�Jb Procedures. you any questions leas ]COYdS: If have am call, � d O ar Recorder at 639- 4171. ,• g e he T CITY OF TIGA RD C &GON M. ORDINANCE NO,. 89-00 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING 'FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ' TO' APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE' PLAN,' Ak4ENDNENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY METZGER A EMS `(CPA' 89- 07./ZC89 --07 ) WHEREAS, the ar+plicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan Areidsrtent from Commercial Prof ieiona1 to Medium Nigh Density Residential on approximately 5,.01 acres and a zone change from C -P (Commercial Professional) to R-25 (Residentia;L, 25 unite /acre); and WHEREAS, tbo Planning staff wade recomvendation of findings to the City Tigard Planning Commission at a public bearing on October 3, 1580; an WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council he].i a public hearing on the ,proposed' changes on November 20, 1989 to review Planning staff and Planning' commission recommendations as well as public testimony. NOW, TBEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS e' SECTION 1. The p p consistent • , relevant criteria. based upon. ro aaal a oonaist ®d.� with all tale the !,acts, findings, and conclusions noted below: .. FACTS 1. Location 13265 SW 72nd Avenue. Approximately 5.03 aci :ee located on the welt side of SW 72nd Aienue, between SW Varna Street and Sw Fir Street (see vicinity map, Page 10) WCTH 281 1DE, .Tax Lots 800 and 801; WCTM 251 IDC, Tax Lot 3600 (Portion). . Bag ground Information ta% lots 800 and 801 from a single � Parcel was approve Creation of ""' through M3.Yaor Land Partition ML sand P 1 -81. The Plan zoning designations, for these parcels were changed from R.!; (ileaidential, 7,500 square feet minimum lot size) to their current Commercial Profeesi nal /c-P designations during citY-Iwide Plan and zoning map revisions in 1983. No other Previous land use or develoPment s g licaticra s regardin g the2 peopertios have been reviewed by the City. {. Vicinity Information Adjacent prorartiea to the north, west, and southwest are toned M- 3..a• ., ) eio cd with mangle family. (Residential, 3.5 unite ®r ears and P renidancoa,, Properties directly south of dth ». 3t' the Mite alR+s rra��ed C -P d P by'' single �y' are pres�►erntl . sanr�le ta�a�.l ;�+sa�.dences Pro ert ;.es across SW 72nd Avenue occupied from also zoned velo ed with a axe site p ert eia are cue nu is r a oaf ace build .a�,gs These prow F :, 1 containing a variety of commercial and professional usea. ORDINANCE NO. 89 Page 1 ql AT6irhitee. yilu,sesubTj ierscatnfsuposnierttteiapthn,i!aoslxilypOi7ciai ar Os nt,,g,01sas3'ici'nr,.; SW 72nd Avenue SW 72nd feet of pavement' or .0;4' ic,b' alt:111i,Mtap*'" the ° tor drains,, tr lh 44 along the site's fr\ontage. The site has slightly more than 600 feet, of frontage lonq SW Fir Street SW rir St.reet.,'.coneiate:-of 20 eet of gravel covered right-of- way which dead ends into the driveways of residences to the south of the The Transportation Plait kap deSi onstes SW rte. as a local street ?ully , . developed lo4al streets .„. feet of improved • With .f411... street 'i4iproVeMetta.;, S The subject property otdnaists of, three parcels totalling approximately 5.03 acres, including a 16.5 foot by 630 ',cot] section of tax lot 3600 between SW Fir Street and the other involved parcels. The remainder of tax lot 3600 is not included in, the proposed Plan I Map lkaliendment and Zone Change proposal. Tax lot 800 contains a house in its northeastern 'corner. The other parcels are vacant. The site contains a grove of Jess in the northeastern corner of the sit. The remainder of the 'a.i.te is meztly open and covered with grasses, weeds, and fruit trees. Tiro parcels are relatively flat with a slight slope towards the east. The applicants request * , Plan Map, Amendment r.ommercial Professional to Nedium Nigh Density ,Residential ein d a one change from 1; C-P (Profesaional/A,dminitatwative Office Commercial) to .1-25 (Multiple- Family Residential, 25 Units Per Acre) for the aubject. parcels. Although a development plan, for the parcel need not be subMitted for a ProPoiled plan/zone change, a conceptual Site plan illustrating how the site miqb.t be developed With a multkple-family residential deVelopment has been provided by the applicants. The 'applicants' intent in providing the conceptual site plan was to illustrate that a multiple-, familY development which wothld comply with the community 'OevelopMent ' ,H code's density transition requirements could beHccriatirticeed1 on the site. Code SeCtiOT1 18.40.04d(A) ,,reguires that area Within 100 feet of an established area not be developed at a residential density 4teater than 125 percent of the allowed density; (as,, specified by the Comprehensive Plan deitionation rather than the current ' zoning designation) of the adjacient eStabliShed resittential ax eC. 'POr the subject': properties, areas with4sit 100 feet of the Rolling Subdivision to the north and west could not,, beldeveloped at a detuiity greatez than 6.25 Units per acre bel'aube the maximum density ailowea,,by the Plan'a Low Density Residential designation applied to tolling.' Rills,' is 5 Unita per acre. FINDINdS Alb CONCLUSIONS , The relevan■`; criteria in this case are Statewide Planning tk)ala 1, 2 o 10 12, and 13; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 41,61 6.3. 2' 6.5.1 66.i, 7 1 2 7.2.1 7 4 4 6 7.8.1, 8.1.1,, 6.1.3, 8.2.2 40.1.2, ORDINANCE NO. 89 - Page 2 „.. 1 J: erns Chapter 12, Locational` Crt:iteria, and t chrpnge Or Mistake quasi --J idL` cia1 map amendment criteria of 'both the Compre, ena;.ve Plan "; and Community, Development code. The City Council concludes the ,proposal is ; consistent with t% applicable Statewide Planning ' Goals and Guidelines ;Iaased upt n ;the followin findings: • Goal #4 , 4 Citizen Involvement) is met because they City's ha0 adopted c .tizen involvement program including reedew. ' of'' al.l developme nt a ppl.icati ©xns by Neighborhood Planning Organizations (1► ) . In addition, al;; public not ce ;regu cements ha been : at. sfa.ee for ;this apps icatiot o • doal 2 (Land Use Planning) is met because the City has applied all applicable Statewide P,Yanning Goals, ,City Coaaprehensive Plan and ' Coammunity Development Code regniremente to the review sad the prolpo ®al. Goal #9 (Economy of the State) is satisfied, although the propo 6a1 wraoAild reduce the City's inventory of develo gable commercial land, beaauee 1) tho reduction of C-P zoned land proposed is not a large amount compared to the total amournt of developable C--i:' zoned land in the immediate area and the Tigard Triangle are ; and 2) 'allowing multi- family development near C -P and X-oP zoned developable Properties may provide en attractive ereby* helping spur ceam�ane~re;iaal and industrial dvelopaaantoin�tt'e area.tl other om u n- t that such a mix of land uses can snec ®esful1 co-exist without . advers el y affecting comm .gcal or industrial growth. The a pplicant have Pointed to the neighboring ifruoe HAY &rea of Lake Oswego where such a mixture of land uses exists. Goal f10 (Rousing) i.e satisfied because the ro P p®sal: will provide for additional housing opportunities as P romoted by the City's Comprehensive Plan and the metropolitan N'nulirg Rule ecre onAdministrative Rules Chapter 660, Division ?) . I�pp�o�val ®i the pro sil would incr eas® housing Opportunities on the City's developable teal ertiaa lands by a total of 125 dwelling Units. A g protal would also p rovide increased opportunities goat. Multi-family de: =oi0p meat. The Metropolitan Housing Rule requires ti,at the city maintain a minimum housing opportunity rate for developable land of 10 units per acre and a minimum 50/50 opportunity mix for dingle familly and multi- family housing. Goal #12 Tram 9' Providing the o_:..ortunit z�ratit�a�) would be portation and Goal *13 Energy Conservation) satisfied through pp y for an intensive land use near maJor transportation corridors (Ri.,gh ay 217' arid 1 -5) as well as near employment centers!, This pry bmoteo efficient use of the transportation systems ,thr,reb y Promoting snaggy conservatfozs. The City Council has determined that t1,te3 r® P penal. 3.® consistent ° witty sppiicable portions of the comprehensive Plan based upon the finds nge it below: ORDINANCE ,110. Page. 3 ' Me • Plan Po icy 2.1.1 is satisfied because . Neighborhood Plaanning Organization #8 and surrounding progertyr, owners were:' . gi en notice of the hearing, g and an opportunity tO ' 'Comment o i the`" .Proposal-' zn addit one " he appUcants have meat with the , in .ediato° neighbors' of tae sits? to pr. cent their proposal in 'aovale,ce of the ,public hearings- . P1& n Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied because the 'proposal would pre�inide thy. opportunity fvr ,additional multi - family development annd world increase the net housing opportunity on buildable. labai■ 'in the +vit. This is detaLlee in the, discussion for Statewide PIannlr g goal 10 above and the attached memo regarding the , effect of both current p1ann /a:an0 s.aaendment psroplisale on the City's compliance with the i4etropo .itan Sousinn:r Rule. • Pollan `policies 6, 3.2 and 6.3.3i will be satisfied because the p7:oposal would allow for development of the pa'opertie in ways that may oe more compatible with adjacent established low denmity reei.dential a'; °eas than the current?l Permitted ' oq /yy , _ b Future . ,�. p uses i/f the �/�P zone ie�vM �d ' be, residential development of the ga;trcei.s will be E3ub jtct to dens pity transition; limitations within 100 feet of tho Low Density Residential. Plan designated areas to the north and west o ' the site.. Theee limitations would tend to lessen imPacts on adjacent properties to a greater extent than Code re t,rements applicable to development propoeala under the current Plan and zone dktsignations. Both the existing c -P zoning designation and the proposed R -25 zoning designation allow a maximum building height of 45 feet. The C -P zone requires 20 foot side yard and rear yard ; setbacks from residential zones and thus under, the t Urrent zoning `' designation, a. 45 foot tall building could be constructed within ;20 feet of the abutting developed residential Parcels. Because the deasit y tr aas3tiorl re quirenents of Y () s unity opine section;.' 16.40.040(A) Policy 6.3.2 a and �o %rev' ®1 25 s ° 4� nt 1® y pP y ' the pe it is unliHsel that would a �. it �-_.._ oro rti.es� were zoned RA multi-family residential buildings tall er than two for des tall would be built within 30U feet of the properties' boundaries with adjacent developed reeidf r :ia? parcels unoh lean within 20 feet of those properties. S The applicants' conceptual site plan illustrates how development of the site might occur in light of the density transfer requirements.. While j` the housin g t� . yp eu allowed ' in the adjacent cent R -3.5 zone and the 8 25 zone t�h proposed for this site may be substantially different, ' the density a si remn e along with code requirements regarding landscaping and buffering can be used to Make the differing housing types compatible. preprca os3a1 for the site through the Site De � review of v devel�p�reint olio: 6.561 will be satisfied through P y g veto en; t Review and building Permit review processes t t. that develo elate ;on the site will sn a�nsure pen 1 not create nuisances sances and hat all buildings will comply with the Uniform 8Uilding code. Plan Policy 6.6.1 will be satisfied through the imPositiOn , of buffering and screening requirements of the (osnnntanity` uev'elop1en' ; Code to any . future development proposal for the pa:operties. oRDINAMe8 MO., 89- G, Page 4 • • Plan Policies 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4 • sand ' .6 1 are satiatie+il bec'a0.yuee adequate public service capacities are " available': ` to serve potential, development on type properties. ,gat:i,s tied:. becau se the Tigard School Dist ict svae• 'informed of 11h1s proposal b The School Drs rice hash not coanmented thaxt the proposed additi.o : of hous'zng ,opportuaniti+ s wi:th3.n fiche D' Lstrict' wou ci cause P ;cF:eaat�d caaspaacities iar, t�,e ` Di.s rici 's schools. The Sc4e ol:' District has for !i.nMreased ,scheol ' apaa a.ty thrraaggh; several pareelieminatar-o school construction and, e�s�ra;lnsieen proposaLG which funding has been approval l HthtOughthe recaent echool tune i:ng tam • levy request. Pfau Policy 8.1. » 1 cozy atite the to plan fOr a safe, , as d , efficient street and roadway; system that aaeetc current atne a ' and a ticipated future • development. This policy would be satisfied because de0�e1oent' • resulting groin the proposed 'redesignation of these parcels • would' fend ff. to reduce th 0 rsuiticipated tra £io;,' onto 8g ?2nd Avenue abd other, ilea by; street® 'aaa compared to develo ntent under the curr -nt oni.arag. Sir. 72nd Avenue ie a ma jor collector street developed With par aan ily commercial ' and ; andus►trial uses and with good connneotionas to several arterials. Although residential use of the site' would be anttcip4ted to generate more nightt ce and weekend traffic than most HOE, the per itted uses in the curret` G -P zone, that traf tic ' would • be expaacted Avenues and not on local t a .ree4:s in 1 adjacent '' rep idential neighborhood The Engineering Division w;l rev sew any future • development proposal Hfor the property and. may require 1001 oven ea to to affected, public ®treats to reduce impact® resulting from future • developments • Plan Policy 8.1.3 will be aati H, f ied as a condition of `, approval of any future development of the properties. Necessary street ; ivaproveements would be required at tae time of development. The City's Engineering Division will review anY future development proposals eals for t he. Properties. 10. Plan Folic* 86202 is satis Led because Tri. -) et offers bus eererice 00 72nd Aveentte on which.'' the parcels have frontag . 'Therefore, the proposed redea = gnation would locate¢ an intensive type of deve«31op&4tent, within close Proximity to an existing public transit 11. Pka' Policy eatiafied because the proposed redesignation would ,rrovide the opportunity tear high density reaidential development' in proximity to transit routes, m or highways, and cOPloY000t centers ether cons thereby promoting efficient Use of the tranapotrtation systems and reduced, g'y umption. 12. The Locational Criteria specified in Chapter', 12 of ,':he plan for Medium- High' Density Residential Use are satisfied for the following re sonny; . u�.al us a. The subject properties are n csatmmiisiGted', to �.o� density development. . beneity transition, buffeas:ing, ' and sereeening teritents o£ thee ORDINANCE NO. Page 5 Community Development Code may be used to help make future development on the subject properties compatible with neighboring ,ow density single family residences to the north and west. • The subject parcels have direct accees to SW 72nd Avenue, a major collector street, and are in close proximity to : ighway 217 and I- , both which are functionally clessifired as arterials. . serious development limitations affecting the properties, such I; as steep slopes or poor drainage, are n),: evident. Essential `public Present development on the facilities are resent; to ro rties and have sufficient icie nt properties nerve capacity to serve ahoy increase in demand caused by development of the Site- . Public transit is available on SW 72nd Avenue front r,� r he. t site. properties c business The are: located within one quarter ::kale of a and office center across SW 72nd Avenue from the site. The site is also relatively close to the under- developed Tigard Triangle area which is anticipated to be a major employment center in the future. The applicants point cut that there are few multi - family ho': wing opportunities, developed c. undeveloped, within close proximity to this future major emploYment center. Development os additional housing near the Triangle may result in reduced n zeds for automobile commuting between home and work. The applicants point to the successes of the Kruse 1'sy corridor to the east as ` an exaMple for the Triangle area of a successful mix of new, high quality office development, mixed den' ity resysdential development; and limited retail development. Although the site is some distance from convenience retail services at this time, it i quite passible that convenience retail uses may become available as adjacent properties and the Triangle are developed. The applicants anticipate that private open space as well as recrational facilities will be provided as part l of development of the site. 13. The Locational Criteria for the Commercial Professional Plan designation include a policy of not locating this use type on property which abuts residential districts on more than two sides. The subject property is ad jacent to the R-3.5 zone on two and one half sides and therefore the present designation is not in total compliance with this criteria. .n os, d er to a`�� prove a quasi - judicial amendment to the Plan and toning._ °maps, � y is evidence of a change in the, neighborhood or communi�. which of ea.ts the that there i the city must als�lo community which ><se subject parcel. Alternatively, the City must find re has been a mistake or inconsistency made it the original designation of the parcel (Cosaprb d ensive Plan# ''olus a 2, Policy implementation Strategy 2; Community Development dodo Section 18.22.040(A)). The applicants assert that a change in circumstances :has, occurred in that,, there is now a'' Significant demand for housing. opportunities aitbLn' °closa prokimity to entployment "centerq. This sort of demand„ was not ae , ev ,dents dust aH, fcw years ago. . Substantial recent 'growth in the region has led. ° to increased traffic congestion ',;.and;, increased, comnurting timea�. * 'Proxc m tir to one's place of elltiployinent 19 now a major factor in deciding where to `ca1'1 home. 1 The housing' industry has reapr)nded`; by developing all densities of houa:irag Close to employment centers.' The applicants'' int to " the neighb ring Kruse Say area as an example of suoh ' a mixed nae, missed residential ,density area that hap, developed in recent years. Opportunities' within the City of Tigard within' .pnet mile of :, the Triangle area : for developing any' type of housing, especially multi -- family housing, °are extremely limited except for multi_familw development above the' first floor in mixed use developnv nts within ,: the Triangle' the fit y .Council. concurs with the'.. aapp?Licante assessment of the increased demand for housing opportunities near employment centers This assess ent ie based not Only' n1090 dlaCU S potential: on po taions wa:th otential develo art but also 0 discussions with potential residents of the City looking to live nearby their places of e6.1PloYmOht and with cuz ent ;dcreaeecl residents whe are concernetd h ewn i tch commute times. The Council also has noticed 4n increase in mtthiixee e sa.d Use. developments and less strict se g re gEation of r .' land. ulaea an A Primarily because such mixtures cf USes can result in decreased 'traffic.' and fuel consumption, th Council supports integration of land uses .where it i' Possible for the uses to. harmoniously cow, - ;mist through proper site plar�ni.rag. T ,e City Council also believes that a 'Mistake in tine original Plan eeeignation for this site in particular as w11 as mistaHa si Lb the Plan Map (ity -topide exist that the proposed action can help to r It l.s f eseieba1 /Commercl,al designation of this articular spite in 1 6 because difficult to assert that, a ®i,att�e vaag imade in the; pro . of the extensive discussion® and deliberatI.One g g ite that occurred at that tisme. Neverthe1es W the Council believes that the 'mistake >Whic � can wag made itr t in; and throughout the ity, was that sn�t � �inonrc�h at�:�ntl.on �r�aai" pr,.i other to�the .need for multiple fam y residential. o artunitieea at locations, such as this that are near rya jc:r employ ntent centers, near cG.finercial centers, near ma j ar highway corridors, and near public tree sit corridor®. higher deneity residential opportunities near employment /commercial centea an d with respect to transportation opr9rtunitiee, reduced dependants ova. automobile transportation could haViti been promoted and some of Tigard'o resent traffic con estion could hav� p. i� � e been a��oidr :� with ®ative itm acts for, the entire City Instead, the current Plan Map designate® the majority of areas available for new nuitiple family residential develapmnent Ear from; multi"- fasail �+ houain : o centers. The p rY areas, gn .. ermplo►yrm�.nt hand commercial- artunii�ies are at�th� far w eterx�, � deans �ts.d for tar' tern edges of the city. end s�outhwea The City Council ' 4 Sion are well aware oil the d1.ff •° a deve�.�a.: .� ; icu�yties. as ' ti�'ne�ien�atrec.�� have r ped and <aa rapLd gr h >h knit tb,e clt � � in ene ttaa have a�,7asen y, ,� ra1. h cbaMsnn cow $a.l., recent years hiss been the great increase in teaff, .c in the newt ' de valo in areas and; inn _de' eloped areas rnnuat peas n th M " to, iirghway g � ra'vela*a ,� through which the new residents ai,r �;� 2 n o and, loc emplo�aent ng and commercial centers. $�ravidi cua g P� es nearer' he T'riangle,� the sw 'i ?nd Av snue torridot, ORDINANCE CE NO. 89 ► Page ? Washington Square/Lincoln enter, the'' central 'Itneisieein; district, and ':nea and Highway 217 can help vorrect the ,mistakeslof 'cidrit,,:exift 'Plan dissignati.c?ns and6minimize future trafac congestion. The .Ciarnail,,thereforer. finds that the current designation of this site can be categOiriZed as a mistake in that it represents.' a lost opportunity to serve the 'City as a wr,.4■Jie' through 'locating multi-family housing, opportunities ol.ose to typical traffic. lattt-acto.rs. Such a redir.isction will require' difficult ''cleci,eiprits regardi,,ng existing', neighborhoods, , such as the Rolling ai,l1s neighborhoad,'"bdt believes that the ,density transition requiremeiIts of [, the OtiManin,i.ty Development Code and careful site selection and Site plan 'scrutiny can be „ utilized to afford compatibility between hosing developments of differi.ng intensities. The Council finds that the subject site is ideally loca.tvii.d with regard, to he Plan's locational criteria for multiple family resMiential,' opportunities, especially with respect to proz:i.Mity to employment centets .4uld • highway and transit access. The Council also find that the applicantiss conceptual site plan illustrates how the densi.ty transition requiremunt and careful. site planning could make high diti use of this site _ ensy residential, largely compatible with the adjacent low ciensil.ty resiclentia'41 Oevelopment;. The City Covil reverses the 'planning Commission's recommendation for denial and approves, the request as illustrated on the Comprehensive Plan Land User " Map and Zoning Map as set forth in E,Ichibit "A" (map). 3: This ordinance shall be effective on and after the 31st day after its passage by council, and approval. by the Mayor. ' I By j....41\IANSIYILIVS vote of all Council m ere present after being read by 'number and title only, this jj,__:_`I" day of December, SECTION APPROVED: pi. ......(•-1 .fatherine Wheatley, Deputy City lilik&- This 7-- day of December, , I , l'ig)proved as to forr.•.: g 0008 $ 'A:1 ,26'221 = ,:26.2Z1 101. .&Nl0d 1VLLINI 1001 2„ S:0L -1701. 33 *Z ?V 01 JACK STEIGE 18270 S INDIA N ''CREEK ! LACE OSWEGO, OR 97034 CORDON RING 4214. SW 51ST PLACE PORTLAND, OR 97221 RAY PIRI 7745 SW VARNS TIGARD, ;rrR 97 CRITERION ,Q ITIES MARK ROCKWELL 1eo° on MAIN PLACE 101 SW ° i IN ST FO1. ;',0 Dr OR X7204 DALE ROSSM 13355 SW '76TH TIGARD, OR 97223 RAYMOND EMS 13440 'SW 76TH XIGARD, OR 97223 JOBl1IE 7730 SW C'TIERR1!: TIGARD, OR 97223 L' a S BUILD /DEVL LQPER 7035 . TA :HA 4 N : 97223 M ILLIE, COX 13320 ' SW 76TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 JOHN TV, DECOSTA FROP ESSIONP L 100 REA141ORS 2851 SW IOLKIEI' LANE 'LAKE OSWEGO, CA 97034 RALPH ', ik, RA 17355 BOON ES FERRY LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 RON KA'N 13395 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 DAVID METZGER, RT 4 130X 267C SHERWOOD, OR 97140 SHARON TAKAHASH1 7610 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD, OR 97223 JAMES A. IvIEYER 2764 SW SUMMIT DR PORTLAND, OR 97201. ED 'GORDON' 7475 SW C t° DR 'TIGARD /. O .?' 97223 BOB SUDLOW 7530 SW VAMP; TIGARD/ OR 97223 STATE OF. ; OREGON' County of Washington -City of .Tigard ■; depose and .say: (Please print ) That 'I am a The City ,of Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF 'DECISION FOR: City of Tigard '2 :tarning Director Tigard Planning Co mtiaston Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City' Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notticea' c►f Decieicn) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A") was mailed � to each na±! id persons at the ess shown on the attached list marked exhibit . H on the. 1'' day of ,A� 1�.:7.:`,, as hereto tached, watt said said 'notice NQTICE � OF DECISION GISIO e Posted on an apprGgriate bu' :. tin kezrd on the r._.. day of 1J • and depo�ted in the united States Nail on ' 1 day of . 19_ _ the � � ,.. d�, p )stadte prepaid. Person who posted on Bulletin Board (For Decision Only Person who delivered 'O� POST OFFICE to me on the / day o s. my Commission Expires: bkm /A FIDAV.'Bk NAT a OF P,U_�.L NE.PIRI NC NOTICE 'I8 BERES! GIVEN THAT THE TsGARD 'CITY COCA :iL, AT ITS MEETING ON HOr3'; AY, October 23, x.98 , ,AT L 3p FM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC C NTER, 13125. SW HALL DLVD «', TIGARH, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICA9I03: FILE N'.. , CPA 89 -7/ZC 89 -07 FILE TITLE: Metzger -Eme /Rockwell APPLICANT: Cz iterion Eauitiee 1800 One Maitn Place 101 8W Mai St. Portland;; 011 97204 REQUEST: *'�:1IE 1 David G s , Metzger PO Box 275 Sherwood, OR 97140 :JZWNRR Raymond 8. Eme 13400 SW 76th Tigard, OR 97223 NPO NOs 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-07 Z01 B CHANGE SC 89 -07 METZGER- EMS /ROCKLWELL Ni 0 #5 A requoet for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from commerciell ProfecaLonal to ediuin- High Density Residential and a Zone Change from C-P ( Prof eeeiona1 /Admn£etrative Office Commercial) t o R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre). LOCATION: 13265 SW 72nd Avenue, between SW Verne Street and ,8W , Fir St.sseet (WCTM 281 1DB, tax lots 800 S 801, 2S1 1DC, tax 10t 3600) (See Map On Reverse Si-de) TNR PUBLIC HEARING ON THYS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IR ACCORDANCE PROCEDURE Si RuLES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C:1DE AND ADAPTED F TEEERT TIGARD CITY COUN L AND AVAILABLR r AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PRocEDr1JRE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30 IN THIS OR T1�STIMO� "PER80N8 HAVING INTEREST NY WAY BE SUBMITTED 18 h4ITING TO' BE MATTgR MAY ATTEND AND BE HEAbis ENTEREL' INTO THE RECORD. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ;T THN' CITY RECORDER OR ,PLAlitifING DEPARTMENT AT 639- 41171, TIGARD CITY ,HALL, x,3125 SW HALL BLVD., T3GARD, 'OREGON 97223. bkm /CPA89 -c 1. BIM RKWA a CRITERION EQUITIES 1800 ONE MAIN PLACE 101 SW MAIN ST PORTLAND: OR 97204 CRAIG l ) KINS 7430 SW VMS ST TIGARD , OR 97223 701 JOHN S. MIL 2305 NE 401.14, .. PORTLAND: OR ` °7212 601 HENRY & DONNA PEARSON 7525 SW YARN, ST TIGARD, OR 47223 702 ELSPETH a. PETERS ' 7325 SW YARNS ST TIG/ , OR 97223 1000 E. LEE ROBINSON c/o 1h ASSOC. L 1950 S BUNDY 'DR: LOS ANGELES CA MICHAEL & ELISABETH FCNTAINE 3,3235 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 w 703 JOHN & MARY BISHOP? 7375 SW VAS ST TIGARD, OR 97223 GUS GRECO 13425 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 614 CONRAD N. FREZZA 13275 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 704 GREGORY & PAMELA ti 1EBER 7425 SW VARNS ST TIGARD, OR 97223 200 WILLIAM & MARGARET DIGIKO }ar 13455 SW 72ND AVE', TIGARD, OR 97223 RALPH TAHRAN OTAK ARCHiTCTS 17 355 SW BOONS FERT Y RD LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 705 ROBERT & DOROTHY MILLER /475 SW VARNS ST TIGARD' OR 97223 2700 THOMAS & JOENE BRII1 7630 S't4 FIR ST 'PICARD,OR " 97223 615 BOBBY & ,KENYA WILLIAMS 13315 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 706 RICHARD & `JESSIH SWANSON 7480 SW `DARNS ST TIGARD, OR 97223 616 DALE & MARJORIE 'ROSSMAN 13355 SW 76 AVE. t/A-(2,..b C `''112 . STATE OF C1RE(', ' �' � 11NTY QF IKA MGTt i, �or±,.ar being fkst duly sworn, depose :end l ey F Director, or his principal clerk �. of the a news ap er,.,of ' an '19a020; P, p 9 ®n�ral circialstion.�s published a aforesaid county end °aid; theft the ear • e printed copy of whrich•is hereto annex *' entire issue 'said newspaper.jar, ,corrnecutiveln the following iseuea, if STATE OF OR CGON ' County of Washington )' as.' City of Tigard ) hang first duly ,sworni 'affirm, on :oath depose and say: (Please print) That X am a The pity of � Tigard, Oregon. That ,X served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF DECISIOaf FOR: t t Y of Tigard Plgsnnin ,Director Tigard g s' g Planning Commission i and Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council, A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Decision)'of.,which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each `' named persons at the a Brea shown og the , p " attached list marked �wchibit 8 on the day ��¢ 39 � . said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as her • attached, was pa ed on an ' appropriate '19_ 3 and deposited byalletin board on the day of in the United States mail on the me day of .postage prepaid. Signature , Person who posted on Bulletin (For Decision On12) Person who deliveted to POST OFFICE Subscribed and ss torn /af f irm to me on the 19'. • 4 NOTLCE OF PURL : C HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TICARD TUESDAY, 02tobr 3. 1 2122 PM, LI BBLVD . TIGARD, CENTER, 13125 SW , APPLICATION FILE NO.: CZ''A 89 -07 /ZC 89 -07 FILE TITLE: Met zger -Eder /ROckwe l l APPLICANTS Criterion Equities 1800 One Nun Place 101 SW Main St Portland, OR 97204 PLANNING CoMMIOSIoN, AT ITS MEETING ON ;CN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD .CaVIc OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWUiG NPO NO: 5 OWNERS: David G. Metzger PO Box 275 Sherwood, OR 97140 Raymond' B .Ems 13400 SW 76th Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89 -07 ZONE CHANGE KC 89 -0'i METZGER- EMS /ROCKWELL NPO #5 A request for approval of Professional) to comprehensive Density residential and a Zone Change from C-P Commercial Prof Medium -High _.'Y o Professional) R-25 25 unite /acre). (commercial nPxofe,neiona].) (Reeidrent8l, ZONE: C (Commercial : Varna Streit and SW Fir Street (WCTM LOCATION: 2S1�1DB,� tax lots 800 & 801, a portion of 2161 1DC, tax lot 3600) (See Map on Reverse Side) WILL SE CONDUCTED IN ACCORL NCE WITH THi THE P OF HEARING 18.32 OF THE COMMMURNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OE PROCEDURE RULES D r .:.. L ��,P ANY pFltSONB HAVING INTEREST RULES OF TED BY THE TIGARD CITY CC�L'°N 18.30' %VAILABLE AT CITY HALL, O% PROCEDURE SET' FORTH IN C' 1APTER I TO THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD., OR TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING THE P.BCO FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE ENTERED I RD OF THE HEARING. FAYLURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR LETTER PRECLUDES CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A CO �MENT IW' DLEECTE BY D COMMUNITY DEVEL ©P1�RNT PRECLUDES' AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. rOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNIt :c DEPARTMENT AT 639- 4171,, TIGI RD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD; PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) # 5 CHAIRPERSON: Crai.,Ho kine PHONT NUMBER: bkm /CPA89 -07 . BErx SiiNDBUR c� ICENNETII EDWARDS & rair.,r)REi) COX '13320:5W 7 TIGARD, OR 97223 619 GERfiLl) & JOAIN1 H0111)3 13280 SW 76TH AvE TIG.411DA OR 97223 * 2 C:413F,LIT & ELAINE SUI"LOW 7530 $W YAM sT RII'&MLtY'GCRGfR 13235 SW 72ND. An TIcAltu), OR 97223 . TIGARTY, (JR 97223 701 MILL FA EsQ 2305 hlE 401111 PCJIMAND, OR. 97212, 702 , ELSPETI1 prism 7325 SW YARNS ST OR 97223 603. HENRY ir DONNA PEARSON 7525 SW YARNS ST TIGARD, OR 97223 901 ZANLE31, 'CLAIRE. GAtaittiN'''',' ?ps SW cA1■1711,ERBtitzle LANE PORTLAND, OR 97201 r ' , I „ S LEE f'<08114.,k-F-40 LTD. do ACME ASSOC LTD. , 1990 S BuNIrie DR.' S-600 LOS ANGELES, CA 90025' 100 GUS GLIECO 13425 SW, 72ND AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 613. MICHAEL & ELISA138111 E9NTAINE 13235 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 703 JOHN & MARY BISHOP 7375 S YARNS ST TIGARD, O 97223 614 CONRAD N. FR.EZZA 13275 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 704 GREGORY & PAMELA WEBER 7425 SW WARNS ST TIGARD' OR 97223 200 WILLIAM Si IvIAI1C4RE'r DICKC)EaF 13455 SW 72ND, AVE TIGAFtD, OR 97223 RALPH TAHRAN °TAX ARCHITECTS 17355 SW BOONES FERRY RI) LAKE OSWEGO," OR 97035 705 ROBERT & DORCTI'HY MILLER 7475 SW YARNS ST TIGAIID, OR 97223 2700 THOMAS & OD= BR/AN 7630 SW VTR ST TIMM ,GR 97223 615 BOBBY & XENYA WILLIAMS 13315 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD, OR k.`47223 616 •DALE & MARJORIg ROSSMAN 13355 SW 76TH AVE TIGPArtD, OR 97223 3500 MARVIN & EILEEN si4i•ii0 13415 sill 72N3) AVE TIGARDe 'OR 97223, 707 Btillt)14 ROTA HOPKINS 43o SW It*tetS,;8T; Vbqkkoi'bitH,012: Aor,4 & RUTE1 47'2Nb' p b • MITT OF i� kril , OflEGON AUG 18 1989 U CITY OF I IGARD PLANNING DEPT. GS?EIZILEMILPLAN AMBNhMatdT, igniA4M Nt__LAILQM CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (5 03) 639 -4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION ME ST 13 I Q OP SW �a.-- WFir TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO T• L. solimac4 '` s ! w BAN 0. rhar, SITE SIZE'.. 1 • �,� /'4� , PROPERTY OWNER /DEED' HOLDER* fte LEES (7P P p"Z ADDRESS CITY PHONE ZIY2 FOR STAFF USE ONLY APPLICANT* COQ TS !�O C?1b.1 EMU 1Tl x r � a MAN ' LAC& ADDRESS/act" 4t�' a� ®.. -�. � PHONE:,�,�. CITY 1 JQ C'�i� - !�" ZIP i - *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant'must be the purchaser of record or a ;lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with 'written. euthhorization. The owner(s) must sign this F application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this ai,plicr.ttion. 2. PROPOSAL S UMARY The owner s of record oord of the subject property ua request a Comprehensive P lan Amenlment :. . (if and a Zone Change €ron to aiss OR The applicant requests an amendment to the following sections of the Comprehensive Plan or Com nun ,ty ,Development Code . Oi37W23P .. Revd: 5/8t CASE NO. G;09-4.71-.0 R'r'SHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT N'O. 1OT& S APPLICATIO AC PIED BY DATE: App]. action elements submitted: w(A) Application form (1) (R) Owner's signature /written authorization ✓J(C) Applicant's statement (pre -app check list) t (D) Filing fee ( 7 ) Additional informatjonor Compre sive Plan Map Amendmeuta /Zone Changes L' E) Napa indicating property location (pre -app check list) fr (F) List of property owners and addressee within 250 feet (1) O) Assessor's Map' (1) CH) Title t aan3fer instrument (1) tartiolo LATE DETERMINED TO BE CO PLETE: FINAL DECISION DEADLINE �. COMP. PLAN Z aUE DESI GNATION: N.P.O. Number: , Planning Commission Approval Date: City Council Approve Date: errs var The applicant, ' L ti ' read . t the pol,icire& and criteria or denying the application' DATED thin .. ,4 I MARK ROC(WELL L800 ONE At 01: SW,144IN ' DALE, ROSSMAN 13355 SW ,767i3 7670 SW CHERE■17 DR TIGARD OR .1 97228 ° . TIGARD t, Ort 9/223 R%'LAIII) OR RAr6114f. TAHRAN 17355 , BOOMS FERRY LAXE OSWEGO OR 97635 DAVID METZGER RT 4 BOX 267C SHERWOOD Cit.1 97140 , , . JAMES A. MEYER 2764 SW SUMMIT DR FORTLk1D OR 97201 AMES POWELL 7660 SW FIR TIGARD, OR 97223 BOB SUDLOW 753o SW vAZ8 TIGARD , OR 97223 F)R PREPARED BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 8 -15 -89 Date Peed ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND THE FOLLOWING CUSTOMER SERVICE INFORMATION: • TAX PRINTOUT The information on the attached P rintout is limed to records provided by Washingotn County Assessment & Taxation Dept. and may not be available from countiee v ther than Washington County O LAST SALE OF RECORD O OTHER WASHINGTON Washington Square : Early, Bird + • NIU`eTNOMAH Poniard' . Early Bird. . .. : COUNTY _684-4404 620 -6811 CLACICAIWAS COUNTY Milw aukie . ....... . 693.70 Early Bird. . :... , :: 653.7330 CLARK COUNTY Vancouver . :.. 696-0551 From Portland .....:.. , .283-3390 This title information has been furnished, without charge, in conformance ance wiith the guidelines approved by the State l ce Commissioner. The Insurance Division c intermediaries that this service is clesi ned to benefit i:... • only g Intermediaries it the vrtirnate insureds, indisor�,zttnate use oni beneftfiinrm�diarie diari ®s will hot be �tateg of nreoon insuran alit Qns tnt p'� y liability is assumed for any errors in this report ��,rnnitied: Said services may be discontinued No liakatli " �s Stank 00. o9DS- 014wcT -23132 (3.89) FUPRCEL NUNDEN ORDCOUNTY E iiRt' HINGTO �E�. +� nt: 00601 "� PCA RTY VALUES FOR 1988 -89 ROLL - CONTROL : 1112 DIST: 023 -81 D i3 81 X1.3 i r.. , r,. iKEY: 00459051- CYL :2 00 LOC:7525 YARNS SM JV :00000 9 n�'�; UT2: AREAaDMTG ROLL SEOa S8764, cARSOH. HEM 0 DONNA 'N ML10.57136 4457? 001. 7525 SW YARNS OR 97223 TIGARD 2511DB 00602 KEY: 00459060 C L_ ARtETA. GEORGE V N 7595 SW VARKES TIGARD OR 97223 2S11DB 00603 PCAu 1012 DIST: 023-81 D 23 s.1 KEY: 00459079 CTLa LOC:767S °ARMS SA JV :00000 UT1: UT2a AREAstATG ROLL 5E0: 58766 HATCH. SYDNEY A JOSEPHINE A 7675 SW VAR85 ST TIGARD OR 97223 NAP: OOPR STY' LAND BLD -VAL' *ASSESSED TA)CADLE PCA: 1012 'DIST: 023 -81 D 23 81 LAND LOC :1575 YARNS' SW J0:00000 NAP: t10PR V *ASSESSED AR_.hhDNTG ROLL SEO: 58765 -- -dies- ww.Nw-- AM- MOO-rM �Y - -1 - -• t01104W PAGE word 25,200 AD VALOREM 42,600 NET TAX 67,800 33% 0 T TAX 67,800 1,678.69 1,678.69 1,628.33 25.200 AD VP,, M 1,990.66 55,200 NET Wet 1,990.66 00,400 34 DIS+COUiIT 59.72` 0 CURRENT TAX 1.130.94 80, t.00 L11*40 25,200 At VALOREM NAP: 00PR DLD•VAL 45.500 NET TAX ;AASESS2D 70.700 35 CURRENT DISCOUNT, TA'IORL .E •70,700 1,750.51 1,750.51 1,697.9999 LAND 25.200 AD VPLOREN 1,034.69 KE1:D0� 00604 LtC :- 1012 DIST: 023 -81 SA tV: 0000 MAP: 00PR BUD -VOL 48,900 NET TAX 1'0834 +69 KEY: 00459088 UT2: L1Kt7ARE YARNS 7 *ASSESSED 74100 34 DISCOUNT 55.04 UT2: - H1REAaDNTG ROLL 5EOa S8767 � i=s . 6cC81 001 ''RKL RAYMOND E NLN1.91656 0 CURRENT 'TAX 1,779.65 ROSIE'KnRIE TAXADLE ;;;;0 7745 SN VRRNS ST PORTLAND OR 97223 • .___. ---- --- -� • 2511011 0005 PCA: 1012 DIST,: 0238 -Oil D 23 0! LfIRD SA �' :00000 KIP: 00PR 1Li1 =ViM. KEY: 00459097 CTL :,000 LOC:7730 CHERRY Si JJT1a UT2:�_a,. AREA :DNTG ROLL 580: 5876:,!' *ASSESSED BIEKER, WILLIAM A .I3A0 1LN1.47517 28510 001 00PR11LE 7730 EN CHEERY ST : TIGARD OR 97213 1012 DIST: 023-81 n 23 81 2S11DH3 59106 Pala" KEY: 00459104 CTL: LOC:710 CHERRY ST i JV:00000 MAP: -00PR UT11 UT2a AREA:DNI6 ROLL SERI K870 GILES. PHILIP M LOIS R 7710 SHI CHERRY ST TIGARD OR 97223` 251101 00607 PCAz 1012 DIST, 023-81 D 23 01 KEY: 00459113 CTL: LOC :7200 CHERRY ST 5N JV:69000 LIT I a . UT2: AREA: DIRG ROLL 5E0: 58770 READER, HUGH F 7790 SA CHERRY DR PORTLAND OR 97223 2511DD 00608 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-81 D ,A 23. 81 KEY: 00459122 CTLs LOC:7670 CHERRY _ GUERRA, EAR1.A .L UT2: SALE 0' 82G0201�9176EI ND 050771 7670 SN CHERRY TIGARD OR 97223 6 1 2S11DB 00609 KEY: 00459131 PUi GUTHRIE. FIR DtkREK TIGARD:,„..., OR 9722? 2S11U3 00610 PCAt.1y2 DIST: 023-81 D KEY: 001159140 CTL:2000 LOC: ', 5 C RRY ST SM ...rat :00000 NAP: OO . SEO: 50773 UT ?t AREA :DNTG ROLL, TROTTT, HAT' AND L0Ufl OL■?23063 09831 001 LOT 16 ROLLING HILLS .,._ 55M CHERRY ST. $"�.E 0000 TAXhIILE 770 TIGARD OR 97223 2511DD ISTa 0?.3 2SI IIRB 00611 PCA: 1012' -81 D' 23 .81 OAP: llOPR LU LAND KEY: o0S59159 CTL:2000 40Ci7715 CHIEORY ST SNN..JVa00000 N. `` UT2a *041214 ..ROLL SEO: 58774_ PET .150!1 ZING HILLS 0' 7715 50 CHERR TTE E 131.3!1, d++ + +4444 001. LOT .15, S 0 R6". T +,,.�+++++ + + +a+a++++++++t�+ JEAHETTE E �3: YtraaRn OR 97i�2 ,,86 _ 06025044 SALE 00010 09450378. TAXADLE '45,200 AD VALOREN 1,792.60 47.200 NET TAX 1,792.60 72.400 30 DISCOUNT 53.73 72,400 CURRENT TAX 1.730.tl2 25.200 AD VALOREM 1,918.87 52.300 NET TAX 1,918.07 77,500 3% DISCOUNT 57.57 77 500 CURRENT TAX 1,861.30 NAPa 00PR NAP■, '00P'1 CtOPR 25,200 AD VALOREM 1,938.68 53,100 HET.THZ. 1,990.68 70,3603% DISCOUNT 58.16 0 CURRENT TAX 1,880.52 78.300',„ I 1,1/94 1.894.10 1,0376..28 25,200 AD VALOSE11 BLD -VAL 51.300 MET TAX 76.500.3* ISS�, TAN TAIOAILE 76,500 '.r m.... .e PCA: 1012 DIST 023-81 D 23 .e1 LOC :7665 FIR ST 1 JVt0001*0 NAP: 00PR 114 AREA: DMTG ROLL SE): 58772 TAXADLE 25,200 AD VALOREM 2,114.47 60,200 NET TAX 2,114.47 85,400 3% DISCOUNT 63.43 0 CURRENT, TAX 2.051.04, 05,400 2S1 i>nB 00612 �- -- KEY: 00459169 CTL. UT2% SU BOCRG., MRRSHAL! 1 JOANNE 7670 531 YARNS ST r 97223 TIGARD 2511>)D 00013 KEY: 00459177 CTL: FORiTAINE6 H:C4 AEU T L S: AND ELISABETH 'N 13235 SW 76TH AVE' TIGARD OR 97223 2S1iDD, 00414 KEY: 004591.06 CTL: F32IZA.NC70 D T2: OR 972'13 T"ARD ' • as-r.or -....o rL{-a..- s�fiYwir. 2S11DE ,.006i5 KEY: 00459195..., CTL: F Aa 1712 DIST' 023-01 D 23 Al LOG :767, +HARRIS . ST SW : JVt 00000 MAP :' 00PR AREA :DMTG ROLL SERB 50775 PCA: 1012' DIST: 423-81 D 23 01 LOCt13235 76TH AVE SM 011 :00000 MAP: 00004 °AEA :DPTS, ROLL,SEOn- 50776. + +++ - 4++4++ +++++++,Rri 44+ • 'FONTAIMI: NICFMIELrELISfl9 TN OOPR 9/04 ;- 340373m 86 PTR 'NA5'II T6DN FEDERAL SVS 11400 TAXAI LE 9184 ° 84037335 5AL.,E, 0904 04037336 LAD 0 LAND 00PR_. 25.200 AD VALOREM 45,000 NET TAX' 70.200 ;3% DISCOUNT' 70e200T TAX 1.739.13 1,738.13 52.14 71.605.99 25.200 AD VAL A84 1.587.08 30.900 NET TAX 1,507.88 N�� 6"%100: 3D .DISemot 47.11- 0 CU RPOIT 'TAX 1.539.47 64.100 PCA,� .1012, DYST: 023-01 D 23, 81 U. • LOC:13275 76TH AVE . ' 50 JV300000 MAP :' OOPR IL AREA: DATG ROLL `�: LOT., 19 ROLLING HILLS �+++4 4+�4+++ 00PR,.. FREZ2A, CONRA0 �i 4!!'O,,r - 86016165 TAXABLE SALE 0000 1170004�i 250200 AD 1lH�OREt1 ,11�ir6.09 LOC:1 X15. 76717 . D, f : 023-81 , D ?.3 , t1� 00PR DI.D =VAL . 746200 „HET. :TAX 1, • 25.200 200 AD VALOREN PET ..TAX 79.2 0 'C IT Irmo 79.208 25.200 NO VALORUi1 47.1100 NET. TAX 73,000 3% 730000 CU NT TAX 25.200 AD VALOREl9 35i 500 NET. TAX 60,700 CURRENT TAX 3% DISCOUNT 60.700 i 960 94 1.960.96 1;,902.13 1,807.51 1.51.22 1.753.22 is • TIGARD 5R 97223 SwLE 0600 ~11790045 rrarrwwwr� ..n www�rww .rrrwwrrw�.wrrrewwwwrwrwr! 2S11DB ^0061r,S`' . RCA: 1012 DIST: 023 -c,. D 23 81 KEY: 00459195 CTL: LOC:13315 AVE SN JV:00000 "Ti: JT2: AREA: L SEO: 56776 ILLIAMS, BOBBY J AND SALE', 07 30271 I MO D KENYA E 13315 Sig 761R TIGARD OR 97223 -wwerrrrr..wwwwwrwwrrw rwrw�rws * X********* Illt,****3************* 2******************* 1 **11* * * * * ***** * * * * ** ******* * * ** t***$* * **** iii* *xu * *s**s�u �sWuax cs:**** Ml KiET !i'o40.126,4°0 MARKET 5440 126,400 L.!ND 1906 286L90;i OLD 353x.839 500; SP -FEAT DPl5E -01 513109i;uii.C^ BASE -02 68596.00 EASE -03 11i961 .00 RASE -04 9556.00 BASE -05 97815.00 DAVE -06 516534.00 BASE -07 .00 BASE -08 .00 BASE -09 .00 BASE-10 .00 AD V(I LOREN 1'.7`, 465, 637.43 SPEC ASSMT 7,652,29.l2 NET TAX 155,117, 933.55 3% DISCOUNT 4.653, 540 12 CURRENT TAX150, 4640393.113 �'Y Ywt: •Y1YV ' 1 ►1.Y1y.... 25,200 AD, VALOREM 1,866.89 50,200 NE: TAX 1,866.89 75,400 3% DISCOUNT" S6.01 0 CURRENT TAX 1.810.88 75.400 H PARCEL NUMBER ORDER M'SHINGT ON COUNTY 2511D0. 00616 KEY: 00459202 CTL: UT9a UT2. ROSSNAN. DALE V AND MARJORIE F 13355 SN 76TH TIGARD OR 97223 PROPERTY VALUES FOR 1985'09 ROLL - CONTROL PCA: 1012 DIST: 023 -81 D 23 91 LOC :13355 76TH AVE SN JV :00000, ';SAP: 00007 4�4 ++++++ + +++++ +++ ++++ + ++++ RROSSNAN DALE t MARJORIE 12184 - 84049777 85 1'�TA SALE 1204440497/7 I RD 0 . e_-_-- ____-.w___..__w_rr_..wwM _Mwe_.orner•r..wr ...w....w..ww•.. .+ww... Aglik 2S11DB 00617 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-8'? D Illp KEY: 00459211 CTL:4000' LOC :133.60 76TH'AVE SN JV:00000 MAP: OOPR UTt: UT2: AREA :ONTO ROLL EEO: 58700 SHEARER. MONICA A 1:LN64001 2318673 SALE 0682 83001664 OC F 13360' SA 76TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 �a KEY: 00499220 CTL:4000 LOC:13320 76TH AVET' 023 -81' II V: 01 2S11D8 0061LL DIS 5!N JV:00000 *AP: r, UTI: UT2: AREA :DNTG 'ROLL SEO: 58781 MYERS. KENNETH EDMARDS N29918 6S73i°4 f+++,►+ COX. MILDRED .JEAN AVERS, ' KENNETH L'DNARD COX MIS i1ED JEAI1 • 13320 SA 76TH AVE 5187 - 87024603 Nil 5128487 01,87 „ 67002583 MO 213/87 Tr,GARI OR 97223 SALE 0107'07002583 I ND 0 rr REA1. PROPERTY 10 ✓10188 PAGE 4419 LAPP 25.200 AD VALOREM 1,931.27 OLD. -VAL 52,600 flET TAX 1,931.27 *ASSESSED 78.000 311 DISCOUNT 57.94 00PR 0 CURRENT TAX 1,873.33 TAXABLE 70.000 LAND 25.200 AD VALOREM 1,933.75 BLD -VA1. 52.900 NET TAX 1,933.75 ARSIESSED 78,100 3% DISCOUNT 5P1.01 OOPR 0 CURRENT TAX 1,871%74 TRUABLE 78,100 LAND. 26.200 AD VALOREM 1,579.66 OLD-VA . 38,6001 NET TAX 1,579.68 *ASSESSED 63,800 3% DISCOUNT 47.39 00P11 t CURRENT TAX 1,532.29 TAXABLE 63.600 291108 00619 PCA: 1012 01ST: 023-81' D KEY: 00459239 CTL :5000 LOC :13280 76TH AVE SN J►! :00000 NAP: 00PR '1 UTI: UT?: flREA :DNTG ROLL SEO: 58782 ' HONE, GERALD E JR AND NLN2550 3390023600567 LOT 23 ROLLING HILLS JOAN M + + HONE, GERALD E JR/JOAN N 13280 SN 76TH 0i.ree 8002027 N7 1/29185 SALE 0168 "88002027 I ND 0 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S11DB '00620 PCA: 1012 DI KEY: 00459248 CTL :5000 LOC :7574 VARNS'ST UTI: U12: AREA :DNTG ROLL SUDLON. ROBERT N ELAINE N *LM1940 7530 SA VARNES ST TIGARD OR 97223 LAND ` 25.200 AD VALOREIE OLD VAL 38,200 NET TAX *AMSSED 63.400 30. DISCOUNT TAXABLE 63.400 CURRENT ST: 023.81 D 23 01 LAND 25 200 AD'VALOIS' SN JV:00000 HV L. OOPR IL -V 59,600 NET TAX" SE0a 58703 i 84.800 311 DISCO NT 0300001181 1, 569.75 1,569.75 47.09 1.522.66 OOPR. 0 O IT TAX TAXAM.E .4.800 ,: 2,099.61 2,099.61 2.9'! 2s 011:3 KEY: 00459257 CCTTL: LOC :72275 VAItIS 023 -Bt D 251100,..00701 PCA: 1012 SA :n'00►",0!1 NAP: OOPR ROLL SEC: T8784. ;t:: FR, JOHN `;S ESC LOT 1 ROLLING HILLS ' :+ 2305 NE '10TH MILLER. JOHN_ S ESO ?11 = R4033913,112 8d 86 PORTLAND 97212 SALE 0000 11220092 ; 291103 00702 PCAa 1012 DUST: 023-81 D A3 KEY: 00459266 CTL": LOC:7325 VARAS'ST SN .N :00000 NAP: IIOOPR UT1t. UT2: 40.32 AREA:ONTG ROLL SEC: 58785 PETERS, ISPBETH J LOT 2 'ROLLING HILLS ADD SALE 0383 83013359 PP D 7325..SN VARNES STREET TIGARD OR 97223 IAS. TAXABLE , 22.700 AD vauxem 1.807.94 50,300 NET TRH 1,9807.44 73.000 3%' AlS01021T 54.22 73.4:0 COMBO 7 X 1 753.22 `t$ DP.LIMIE1 r TADS **s KEY: 00459275 CTL: LOC:737c DIST: 023-8 11 23 ®1 2S11DB 00703 PCAt,.1012 . � ST 1:i1.J0:4",Mt?,1)0 UT1, ... UT2:.. AREA :DNTG ROLL SEO: S878F s BISHOP, $O1-,'I.0 NARY E Ei TIGARD YARNS OR 97223 L 1 251101 00704 rMr " e•1I••■•■•■••••■■•■•■• ■■..1•• PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-51 D 23 51 LAlal w tAP: OOPR LAND *ASSESSED TAXABLE 25,200 %TIGARE ALS 38,700 AD VALOREM 63.900 SPEC ASSIST X63 900 NET. TAX 4032 3* DISCOUNT • Us RELIT BIT 25,200 AD :VALORUN 36.500 NET TAX ... 61,700 3% DISCOUNT 0 CIIIRONT TAX 61.700 40.32 1.5[12.13 40.32 1.622.67 45 3. 1,527.67 1,527.67 45.03] 1,981.8 KEY: 00459284 CTL:5000 LOC :7425 VARHS..ST . SN. JV :00000 140: 0LD -VAL UT': ' UT?: AREA :DNTG ROLL.. SEC: 48387, HEBER, GREGORY C AND MLN2297 1020022500 ++++44+44+++++444+0+++++4$' TAXABLE PAMELA A,. NEBER .GREGORY AND PAMELA 09/85 - 85037426 7425.SM'VARNE5 SALE 0905 85037426 I PR 0 TIGARD OR 97223 rww_- .____w_w_wwwr__w__wr_w-rrrw . .... .:..... .. ......... ... . ...:.. •••■•••••■•p 2S111)11, .00705 PCA : ,1012 DIST: 023 -01 D 23 e1 KEY: 0459293 CTL: LOC:7475 . . .VARMS.: ST ... , SN JV:00000 NIP: LT1: .UT2: ARIA :ONTO ROLL SERI 58788 MILLER, ROBERT CLARENCE DOROTHY N2LL 7475,M VPINS TIGARD ` OR OR *no r__ rrw.._ fr rwlr r..r rrrr U.Unotsri.l,..rrrrwrrrwr•errl.r. 25.200 AD YIt LI1 +fir„ 1.606.90 39,700 NET .TAX. 1.006.90 64.900 30 .� DISCO NT , 48.21 6F.'900 CIIENT TALK 1.558:0 NPR KEY: 00459309 CTL LOC: 2S11DB.:00706 PCA: ..1012 DIST. 023-81 D 23 ,el �;ww t.IMBl. 7480 YARNS : 5T SN J0;041:10 :'wle': OLD-WC: UT11 UT2: AREA:DIITG ROLL SE®:, 5870°. SNANStiN, RICHARD CHARLES 44 +++ ++4 ++++ +++++++++++4+ +,, SNIANSON, .,RICHARD.,C r JESSIE 00PR JESSIE .. , 9' . 04 6 06019717 SALE' 1201 '02005896 I., DDS 1,11 TAXABLE 7480 SW YARNS ST TIGARD , OR X7223 rw.._rei..r 25,200 00 111EORER 11596.99 39.300 PET TAX , 1.5%479 0145003% DDISCOINT 97.91 0 Qt11RENT T1bt 1.549608 1'.4.540 t... s..1rtl I�� .,y ,� 25(,.200 AD ,1MM.+Of 1 51,200 NET TAX 1.1131.4 1.891.0 76,400 3% DISCOUNT 56475 0 CUP' NT TAX 1,839.09 761400 7480 SM YARNS ST •TISRRD OR 97223 .- 2511DB '014707 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023 -el D 23 81 KEY:, 00459319 CTL: LOC:7430 ,1 JV:OP/000 MAP: 'D1PR UTI: UT2s AREA:DM ROLL SEO: 5S'�70 HOPKINS, BURTON C RUTH 'N SALE 0000 11940964 7430 SW YARNS TIGARD OR 97223 .rN..�...YN N�reNere- - - -- 1,651. 7 r„ er ----- __e...eaw_ - -N 25,200 AD VALOREM 1.6411.47 KEY: 00 59328. LOC: t8t2 DIST: 023-�Bt SD JV:0 000 HAP: OOPR . 41.500 AD TAX" KEY: 00459328 CTL :5000' LOCe7 A :DKT 1N'.�L SEAL 58791 66.700 33 DISCOUNT DTI: UT2: TAXABLE 601.9;1 ON JAMES R CATHY A NLN3037 AXABLE 66.700 JACKS 56953c SALE 0000 121'80305 OOPR' 0 � TAX L 7380 SM 9iARN5 TIGARD OR 97223 25.200 AD VALOREM 2S11DB 59337. PCA: 1 02 DIST; 023- 81 D 49,400 NET TAX ry SW JV :00000 HAP: 00003 LBAtrTi1 A1. KEY: 00459337 CTL: LOC:7330 *ASSESSED 74.600 3% DISCOUNT UT1. AREA:DNTG ROLL SEC: 58792 74.600 CURRENT';TAX DORMER. ROBERT C AND + + + + + + + + + + ++ +++ +++ + + + + + ++++ DORMER,, ROBERT AND KATHRYN TAXABLE KATHRYN E 07/85 - 85028752 7330 SN YARNS ST 97223 TIGARDre_- a.-- rN�, .rre- NSN.,- _Ne....-- .rN. -Nr�. 20.200 AD VALOREM 1.916.87 2S11DB 007110 PGA: 1012 DIST: 023 -81 D{:pt, 57,300 NET TAX 1.9. SN JV :00000 NAP: NOOPR f.D VALED 77,50033 DISCOUNT • KEY: 00459346 UT2=5000 lOCo1ARREEA:BNTTG ROLL SEA: 58793 77.5Q0'CURRENT % 'TAT 1.057.57 GORGER, NLN3049 001 056 575 PT LOT 30 ROLLING HILLS TAXABLE MOLI.Y RICHARD A SALE 0000 12130816 NOLt.Y J 13235 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 *m*************** * *i**91*** *** * * *** **** *** * * **x* * *** * * * *****z * **axs **S * ****2 u xs c sx si" • MARKET 5441,199,500 MARKET 544t.199,500 LAND 1906 657.400 OLD '00 5 97815.00 3534.542,, BASE-01 5432164500.00 BASE -02 6S85�t6.00 BASE-006 11 39652.00 BASE-09 .00 95563.00 BASE -10 BASE-06 516534.00 EC ASSN 4x.654.338.41 CURRENT TAX1S0,490,205.002 AD VALOREM 147,492,206.99 SPEC ASSHT 7,652x336.44 NET TAX 155,144,543. X71 = t SUTYTr 5111161; •'r LU I v..vV +•ri'r • 25,200 AD VALOREM 2,025.38 56.600 KEY TAX' 2,025.33 �y[;y 01.800 33 DISCOUNT 60.76 0 CURRENT 'TAX 1.964.57 TAX FLE 81,800 • 1.847.06 1,847.06 55.41 1,791.65 ROLL: PARCEL NUMBER ORDER NRSHINGT'OW COUNTY 2911DD 00710 251100 00900 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023 -01 KEY: 00459355 CTL: LOC:1326S 72ND ANE UT1 :. UT2: 40.16 2�3EAt ROLL SEO: METZGER, HELEN M 0,81- 95918 7/ 1'61 P 0 BOX 275 �RHOOD OR 97140 E 0000 81020207 J .1 a1iaio■c PROPERTY VALUES FOR 1900 -99 ROLLrCONTR01. LEGAL CONTINQIATION REAL PROPERTY 5879�►JV'000Oa MAPS OOPR ** *t***1� i 00PR LESS TL 001 -2 m44AC TAXABLE MNrrNOe! + , --e -81 ` LAND Meee_Nw� 2511011 2 0 . a 1 P'LA: 2002 DIST: 023 JV :00000, MAP: NOOPR T KEY: 01223 3 s LOC: At1EA: ZFXY' ROLL EEO: 5879 UT9t UT2: METZGER. " TEENAAT• 1' AND /AS "RS C ®000181015 2 /81 FRON TL tKO SALE P:'0 BOX 275 SHERWOOD OR 97140 291100 00901 PEA: 2012 DIST: 023-81 1 Loft JV 44929 MAP: 00010 ILD- VAL._. KEY: 01119914 CTL: GALTON, ZANLEY F AND 2925 SNACANTERBURY LANE PORTLAND OR 97201 251100 01000 KEY: 00459373 CTL: ROBINr E..LEE UT21 %:ACMSSOCIATES .LTD LO ANGELES CR 99000250 r.rereeeN _err ■e-wrre- e...re- rmrrw. 2S1iDD 01100 KElt 00459382 CTL: UT2: RODI 145_00, ,.E LEE t '>rR ACKER, . JANES F AND ELIZABETH''. ANNE 02107 SN'GREENNOOD RD. PORTLAND 0 97219 AiEA:ZFMY ROLL .SEO: CENTER P 12 ASCOT B OF 5 M363 86-87 7,16/8'; 3/84 - 84009167 LESS .05 AC TO. STATE HNV SALE 1073 800071'951 V CT 1.., PCA: 2012 DIST: LOC: AREP.: ZFNY ROLL: SEA: PT LOT 12 .66AC ROBINSON BLDG B5 11'17/07 06/85 85027230 LESS - •01AC.TO Ti 1001 WINS R'LRES TAXABLE GRLTOM Z F AIMD C C OF a-Wu 6/8/82 11i :19020 NAP: 00001 S8787 SIDSSESSEI) 72ND BUSINESS CENTER . TAXABLE BS 1218/87 ASSOCIATES LTD AA 82°24337 01/'03,83 SALE 0655 85024344 .I CT o PCA: 2012 DISTs 023^191 LOC: AREA :ZFNY ROLL SEO: L01 " -13 SALE 0981 01029000 I cT 0 .Ns19020 MAP: HOOPR MOO 72ND BUSINESS CENTER CRU/1PACKER BLDG T1#XI1D1.E 0 /10, B, PAGE 4424 374.200 #TUG DELSN 20.116 600 AD VALWEN y, L89 374.000 SPEC 1691T p TICK 9,30C.05 374 000 -33 DISCOUNT • 273.00 34.16 CURRENT TAX 9.021.05 37'0',400 AD VM MEN 9.314.26 377',400 MET TAX 99.344.26 3771.400 33. DISCO NT 280.33 QIT TAX 9.063.93 • • LAMDepNe..ei.Ne� 2511DC 00100 -rN PCR :11012 8 ?7 DIST: 023 °81 'D SN J11 :00000 MAP: , Bt.D�1lAt. KEYt 00459391 CTL: LOC :3425 ZTGL ROY SEO: 5b739 *'•' D 13425„ 5N 72ND AVE • 'v� APPLY `RESIDENTIAL: VALUE UT1`:. L AIN: si • ADDITIONAL VAX LIABILITY OO f GRECO .GUS LbRAINE' SINGLE rMLY RES f'rENCE -POT t #� + T TIGARD OR 97223 AA 46602 9/12 DOTE N52 Wm, 7126/De Co:D3 -3711. 4111AB LESS .01110 TO 72ND AVE 11 OF E x4031 4'1,82 163,'700 AD NALO 1EN 13,922.31 398,600 NET TAX 13,122.31 562.300 3% DISCOUNT 417.67 562.300 ; 0 TAX 13,584.64 116.140 I V!!EN 14.164.95 456.000 NET. TAX 14.164.95 572.100 33 Discomfit' 424.95 572.100 CURRENT TAX 13.i�40.00 100x110 AD VALOREM 10.000.41 303.900 NET. TAX.... 10,.411 403.900 33 DIST 403.900 OaMRR1:11T TAX 9•700•40 24.600 AD VA1.OMEIN 26.8P0 NET 'TAX. ,1.272+.61 51.'1 e2 NT �r 1,234.46 51.400 g sAL� Oooa 026203,x.9 0 ,' 24. 'AD. 0A 1,31.77 8r D N 1�. ;'' � 1.361.77 KEY: 00459408 CTL: LOC:13 55 Nth: B1.D -VAL 310.400 NET si M_ r 25,11DC „00200 PCA: 1412 0272ND DIST: 0 + 101 JIV :00000 .....r- .;..�.��. UTt OFFr 'WILLIAM GEORGE 911101.EDFT` TONAL T IABILc 44:10 R' G ROLL.SEO :' 10S00... MLY RESiIDENCE -POT 6' DTRGARET AAA. 6601 iti 11ESIDENITAL r, UE. NS1.::l818Y�:�7/2i/88 CO 1 - 1d 3✓.0 DES .03 . TO 1! ET, i 121 �CO 4209101 .0110.. 13455 SN 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 55.E 1.32 Z 30 DISCOUNT 40.85 0 CURR<,,NT TAX 55.000 ELIZABETH ANNE' SALE 0981 8902988��i I',CT 0 ORt�x � OD RD_��.�._�_,.�_�. ...,__�---.�--__�-_-�_- . '' � ' - . Q210 SM GREENIiO .: _ OR 97219 � � """"°'"`"�`' 2�F.6fEQ AD 9iA1.OREM , 9.2�7�.6� , R AND � ---� � -�--- --- � --- �� 1�2��6�F ZS191lC ";00100.`� t�C��: 1092 8? AI�SET: 0�3-A1 D 26.8a0 !�T TAit '' �•� SN JV:A0000 MA?s � a- p�F,►�. 00�59391; CTLs LOC:I,AREWsZTGl. ROI,L SE�: �8�99 '' �ASSES.�iED 51,�f00 3�t DI5C0lNT UT�: 0 �1' TAX . . �Y�,. : ;+DITIONAI. TAX �.I6iEILYTY OOPR ,�, � GRECO. GlJS IORRIHE S��E FMLY RESIDENC�-P01 L AD++t��►aM*+t+t+��+�+t4�+�P TAXA�9.E 51e 0 113425 SN 72ND°AVE qpptY iIESIDEMTE�N. VALIIE 'TIGARD ' OR 97223" ��6N52 88i89�7�i26i88 CO 93-379f 4�14t�63� � ,. S�I.E 0000 026C0329 AUE_-_,�.._��_��_�---s8Z , , ._ 9 OF E N�F03 4it. ;; �,, . � : . LESS .01AC t0 72ND ,� a �.� � N �y ` �7 .��r• AtYi��t '�� ^ r��.=..��o�� w��r�.��wr��ws��.o� � ..,. � .�� .'.� . .��Y�� '.l�Y��{I� �K"�tlTOLt�/ �11700�� :� � o.�a.a'a - :� 25l9D� 0020Q PCA: 1012 82 DYST. t123-81 D ' � ,K�Y: 00459408' G1'L� I�OCs13455 �2ND AVE SN �JV:00000 AA�A. nLD°V _�� ,_� ��, . f,1J1\.�� .. . . , �./� e . ..�.. � ..-.�1'^�.��Uw�wr�� wa�"'�� .. . � I . 4V�e7 .. n b _ , , � ' o b�N��TAy( 1o3Z'0.92 Tt: UTZs AREA:DMTG kOLL,fi�0u,,�POT5L�01i,�.ITI0N4�. iAM ►i�RH�LITY � �ASSESSED 55,000 � U � MPRG�RET NILLYAN GEOR6E saINW.E FMIY R�SI�lrC� a♦��*�+tt�+r�a='��::��+�+µ+♦o+$++ TA�.E 55•000 134SS Sa 72HB:AVE qp�6°�;! 9112/88 APPLY RES2'i��NITAII VAIJE ` TIGARD OFY:97'223 ��N0�TO�STREREET� ��A��QAMRECT�ION �3��OtAC ` � 0000 026Z0�31 � � w� - 1�. /� � .. ww��+�M��M�i:�r�w�www��Mw�.srt+r.c.o� ... .. 1V1� �W 9�i.� J11�7�� .� . 251tBC 00300 ��---------�A. 101� DISi'�: 023°81 ,�; JV:O�w�10 kMs MOOP� SL�D-VAI, �00 iEf TAOt'' 3.1�•� ' ' KEY� 00459k17 CTL: I.OL:135lS 72ND AVE x��D 129,Z00 3� ATSC01i1'i UT1. UTZ: At�AaD!!YG itt"�.L 5EAY ��*;i��t�t��x�s#.�*t� TWXA..M.E 129.2A0 ��R TAl� 3,102.99 ; GRQ�CO Iid1l�STM�tit� a�MtS9 88s89 7�26s8� CO'83-3793 4�11�� -------------- �97E23 �ESS 02tK TO 72ND 114fE SAI.E OOAO !l�1-2S227 '� ,,:Y.,.�,.�,---.----� . 89 TIGflRDCEwTURY OAl6�_�-------,..._�..e�....�:.�..--�-----�- - 2�►.6� �fIGR�c�� ,' ' r PCA: tOB� 62 DE''�s 023-8y p A3 3�i.700 AD 7f'�.OitEN 1d�68 Z3 2Sl9D,.. 00400 � �:000�0 NW�a OOAF! �� 30�'Sp"k�ti5�tT �F3.31i .• BtE�: 004594,�6 CTl.: ' LOC�13565 TZlId AV� . ZED 59� O I�ET �f�4 1.513e�"J UTi s SINGI. ZTGI ROU. sE�: '�p ��36 3'� DI�L�l�!�! yD,,�'10 UT2s 45•� �A MRK5'�M. ANTHOkY J • ONlM. �Wi LyAEI4�I'tY , OTOP�t�; �� ,YF�: �E FNr,�Y,RES�DE�IICE°POl' L.ADpETYiiE�ID�i1TI6M.1ii�.0� �' ' : 13565 SH 72N� A'ii� ° TIGARD OR 972�'3' M 4661�1 ! Aq�3l►�73, 9/93� � � MEt 66.�7i26✓88` , , CI.�ICAI. ERROR 9t� B'OF E�6 s�1 4id�d2 _ ' �,q� 2�1r6A0 i�Q Nf�.Oi�M ta3i9.20 _�_�..w__�_.,_.� � 9,�•� 2St1DC 40500 PCA: 1012 !!2 DYST: 0�3�F11 II oSOp IET 11�t �il .Ns000Q0 IMiP: O� � +��r300 �D1�900YN't ' • KEY: 00459435 C'�.t''i00� LQCs`t3615 7�tlD �E �B,�Z ,, ^I UT9: iJT2a d6TG ROLl. �0: 9D003 ��0 C�71tt 7� " SI11p.E�0 906Z6 001 � '� : ' , ,, GAGE. ROHERT R M�� TII�Nf�L TAX LIR�ILITY Ti�.E • 136t5 5N 7��1A Y RESID�NCE'POT L ADDE qR w664',� ?�t� TIGRRD � OR 972� A�PPt.Y �SifIElfPgAl.�'i�.lE �OFE ��'Ot f�Et 66r'99�1� `CO 85-07'4�C 12i13�'05 �:,E�S �0lAC Tl!STR�T 4 . ' �Al.E 0000 78091005 .�,,.�.��_..�..�,� _ olpp: 00005 � 13�o-.200 ��Wr.ORE1! 3,322.'T3 PtA= 3002' DaSTs 023-Q1 D � 13�b.Z�i 1E�Tl�f 3,�•73 2S11DG 00600 000 T� t�.�,,ap ��I90�l�T JI�:00 • KEYs 00459'�44 1�i LOC: �a1P�P R9L1.SEiI: 5�4�! �IT . �+� llTi s - . su��Y►�. ��nr�. .eeNC �.�s.ee s» u��ee � �� :IiESTERN INTERMiqYI0P1A1. ` �i�6-�1507 �12r�6 . ADD�PT VElGRT�D ST *•0�1C PROPERTIES; , 10/�.. �qp4�?�5 'L PIl�' ' ' 618 M!1 GI.ESAli ST �IITE 300 9��-A6 N�E REtiItl� �15��5 �� 1�5�� .. PORTLAND t�t 972t�9 �SS .02AC TO STAEE'T 5� IQB� 61�OM�S I CT'r°" w� ,`�. . ii4_F�+� �., Lr�1� ----g--------""`_'".�"`_""� , �1.�"A sTI� • : I 2511 DC 00�00 a'r��i 31l12 �lI56�'� 023-�i D A3 ' . . � !.!�0 f�VN�.�1 ; Z,.�153.Q1 ,.: KEYs 0045�171 CTLt �O�s 1�AS�7�� SEQs 5 OAS'N 00Q00 i�Ws �DO�UU�� g9et1�0��1� . �" �� 0.1fi 5tl Q 9�Aut��O fET TM�I �.�.7�'34•� UTti UT2s,. � 20.1C,3i�I5La1MT 12207.NM CO�tkELL.ROAD C0��10I°3018 3/30�/84 I�E�SS .01AC T0 STREET ��Tp,�' 2r��Q , ' �y HICKETHIERs P O R T L A N D LILL�9 7 2 2 9N�S A L E O OOA O�NP10l36 _ - F . � ; � `:_ ` : � u ; , • �k��t�k��K��c�#�t#* *7R*�*��*�tt*��t��Rt�E ; � � �e39T3:'�o0 � 3S35.e37.�o1! �' ' »oe.�s. , .�e �BAST 5��•0?3.S00 lM1RI(�t. 5WM�4.073.�� 5E-03 !l4SE-� 3�'r563 00 1AS�-��150,��31Z�'.�3JS ± E-01 54�5039�00.00 MiSE-02 1S66SW.00 �E„4e 4� DASE��, .00 Dq�'1�. �� BASE-06 596534.A0 'dASE-OT �� ' AB VALOREM 1�F7r563e366.02 SPCC RSSEIT ?r652�422.12 fNET TAX 155�215��.14 3;DI ��SSbi�lyd5. . „ , , . , , . �;�, �� ' , � . ' L 1 , e ... _. � w . P'�. � � - w _ _ � � m _ . � __,.�� ' 1�i9C�� Plli� � 44�1 � �' ROL�:e PARC�I.�,NITla1��N OR�O l! N T Y:, PROPER`� 9Sd�s! 1�'Rp01�tT�' � , � i1A1,QES EOR 9 ,�a A s �; r r�.-co�. - � � �.�+ � � To.�roo po v+n�oaei _ J �. .� �. �' 2511.DC..010�0 70.7N IEt;'IMO� .. � .•� pCAa 30Q2 DIST� �0'3-01 �' .�V:00000 IMps 0�00 �.70�,3��T� ` KE1tt GA�159�480 CTI.s LOCi T� . llT2. ... AREA:Y2P ROI.L 5'�Q: .58b015 . . " 1:�7 9� GI�tCL� AN.PRQD�CTS Cdf�fM11� �0' 4 r � „ � � UTt: 8RC .. . ' � � 03AC �1A S�R�ET • � P.0 BOX.1171 �4-'�G657. 12�`8 , � -� 353 , i,IRC� AMI PRQIDl1CTS COw'1MIIr 4d� - lM10�li�53 , .:, � ST3.?!!p il0 iIM�.� , ��.E 1278,7?01�611 l� C!1 ,. ... , . :. 4l,�1?3«iS ---��---- 9 . � _�.�._.�. !2 DiSTs 02'3-9� D L�JI �9.a73:is PCA: 3� .. ., ., l4t�.!8!0 ME1'..� ' �10 ^�S11bG .A110Q . :D1�tQOd00 , �: �IOOPR ,�� y�tlrM��i�I9CU111 1r�?3»�i!' � KE�f i 4i�4�r9M99 �TLt LOCi 1�185 ,. "HI�.�ST 1�1Y' ilT�t. . Ta.�r'; , I°01.4 �A:' SNd1? -... . Tl�MLF 1�:� CI!!Mil�R Til� 4�ri�H��r`.t,� I ' '; UT1: TO '1a. � I � CO , .. � 4d!00 Z �OAC . � c ' caar.�.� �a �.Pao�s ta� °� e6 r� er��.; • . _ - . . PD:'�OX (171 MODEST�O CA 953� , 85�=di bOFE REC�DEC �'1 S�� CO�t=:�KSa 12,�'7�/�M , Y � LE55 �'f`TO STR�EET �lb4 �� .=.�= � l�OF f� �C d4-�S, 7» . � . . ".�.� 25i�1 Ir�:''.�.�M; � ` � . � .. 2s1 �^ � ... .. �SAI,E 127e 7!'OD ST: 0�� :D �:��1 ' � 'K� �i� ,�, ' � 25� �� «1 � 1 bC Q i 304 P+r,x 1012 6t.7N IETi`'iMlO� K�1�� OA459505 GTl.e2d00 LOC: .'T►10... yIRRI�fE SN e�t�00A0 Ml�r OQpR �i,t''IM�+:, , � ��CIERRY� . . . � �;� � ,�... �� IR��N ��1I��' � 'i,�� y Aw . y .p'�i ' � : �� UT�1��+!�y +�� y�.��.yIJT2i;�- �� yR01.l..5E0s�� 0 �y� *y�w f��+ �y� q� �y .r �'� �r1t1 i � , '�,4ar9M FUa.,� CSC1T "017TT�{!'v� ' �. �.T l3:�.RVIV��,i1;7�fY�81.bD�'4�, � �, ..a1ff� ',. `n�.: � �oYC.E.�,� s�aooa �ts��z �1 0 741 Q S. p OR�TZ23 "r,,:.,.'.�'�, 1110►._'IiIr.IQ�1� ;��J'3,:tt � GAR � 1 TI . , � ��N �� .,., tJ�! � �'tt �:.��...:�.�-=- . � �1�3. = ��W. i � ;. _ ,,, ��: � , . ,.:� �.w.,._ � oia �� :'o�e� �a� �i�� ei �� c �. �� ' s000 � �.a=� r��a ..��, . �Si:f bC .o1�ib0 • - DRIiIE' Sli ..cNsOil�00 !�t �� Q.�O�lET;;:1� •'I,I 2'" , p�A 1 �TL '� 0045951� ` "s � ��G�� , �.. k I I ' �� N « ' ..,- .. .� .. . .. � �..�.,,., ' ... �..:.�... ... ...�. ._�,... �, , ��. . :.�..:i��.�:., ..... '��w. t '.,...:..�.........�...�.... �,,: . 1 .; . �;Y�� oR 9�az3 ; . � . ��MN��O��s��bN�Ip�N�l�� r�N��M�rM�r�M�d7e�MY��r��IM��N! ZS19DC�027`OC' PCAs 1G1�! DIST: 023-P9 D 23 �1 2S.Z'OQ �4D Iicr,�.OR�l1 2o2S0.07 � , • , C't1.a5000 I.00�;7l�3a SN JV:000�0' ' MlA�: OOPR � 66•000 I�T°'�AX 2.256.07 KEY. AG459649' UTt: UT2: AIt�EI: ►tOIL &EOt 5@&?2 SED '10200 3� DISCOIAiT i7 7�F aJOE�•A��HONAS 11 MROI.��'HI�LS N0. 2 566928 �5AOI�.E�0000 09390820 � 0 CI�RENT'TAX 2.��0.33 7�30 FIR S'� �1.Z00 TIGARD OR 97223' , . ��M�ww��w� ��M�r „�M wNlr�v�N . � � �.��.'�Y��Y��l1 � ..�. .� �. :Y�IrOe� � U 9 9 DC045��58 CT� l OCa 761 S� ��yD,xS�: OY3-91 5M .N 00000 MRP: �PR DLD-VAL �3•2��00 1��'T�� _10��8�7 ,,- , � 6�1,'�60 3�t DI9CO�MT �s.ZK GllYH�I�� !''LaYD uNA� 7615 SiU CI�PIRY 5t AREA:,MIY6 RQI:L SEOs 56823 �� 6p,9A0 � �•�•S3 � RY a++*+��++�♦�+�o�+��o�a+++ !►6FE M70t 6aEC 88/�9 8i1�88 VETERR�I, �.500 O�ilENT T TIGARD OR 1`7223 : ��»...�......��_...�� :. � 25990� 029110 PC(a: 1012 DIS'ls 023-611 1f �3 �1 �.�D _2S.2�b0 AD 1iiM.0i0Ei� 1o7S2.� , �cEY: OO�F59667 CTt.V LOC:7S�5 C�,'El�R1f ST SM JVi00000- QIAPs OC�R Fl.D��.':9L; �5,600 NEF TAX 1,�.�5 IJII'�s lfT2s AiIEAsLMTG PO�.Ii. SEAs 56�24 ��i�D ?Oe8l10 3�DI'9CGlR� 52.�!� CFast�c. HAQRY A 1�x�ETH A SALE m000 Oa��102�M OOPR :� CIARENT Tl� t.�N.�7 7595 S►�1,r�lERit� ST TAXEi�; 70r�Cn � TIGARD OR 9�22� � � � � r.�w' �� .�+.��:. . .. - ZK�Ys�0�159�676 CTL: OCi7�i52 �I�a 023-f10 �„� ��00 00 IMW: OtlPR lL�D-YA� M3,�0 �1'�TAO(� 1.6g 6�� UY1. UT2: Al�sDI�TG Rq.! g�0: �1925 �SSED d8.1�..�1 3�i DI9C�OIAIT 50.96 EDlOARDS.. GREGORY L LOT al�6 RO�.l.ING HIL�.S PI.WT il�. 2 OORR Q Ci�E11T TAX i.�l7.S�6 �a ,;io�ra sw..� o000 �sz3o�w� sw� 6e.6oc� 75�F5 SN �FlEIipY TIGARD OEP 972�"3 , e�__.��..�»_�..e. .�.�.�._.. KEY: 0045968� CTLa�i000 i.ats 7495 CI�ERRtt UkIVE SM JN:OO�Oq MRP: OOpR It.D-!l�M. 50.100 I�T T6�c 1,8�6�.� 2S11DC 0310t PCA: 1Al2 DYSTs 023-81 D 23 @d �.N�D 2S � q�L�t,p�Ol i. o� NORZ�I�RIC. DE1dNIS FRAPNCI. WREAsAMTG ROI.L SEQ: �'"�'.6 � �5. 0 3�t DYSCOIlfT 55�93 • � 8!D 0 OOPf! 0 ClMl�f1T T�Ct �,808.�� . UT2. MAIiCY A`�1 89 I �AX�I.E 75.3Q0 7w95 SM'�„HERRY Yb N�111Z9999 �157�1 SAI.E 0818 7�D391 TIGHRD A�Z 9'72�:�3 , e _ �..�.�» ..�..��._ ..., o . OO�P59�694 CTL: LOC. T►75 CF�RRY_DRI�E23-8G ra �i , I.f� ' 2�,20i0 AD YAI.�REII �.�4,20 I `- s UT2. ' � AREA:DlITG R111.L SE� UTt . _, S�0 JJa�lOC�00 M�+a OOPR i�D-�. 541el00!IET�AOi t,e@'4.� 2 DIISTz 0 „ 59�2'� C 2 �SSED 76.10Q�3� DISCdlMd� 56.53 2519DC 03200 PLAa 1�1 _ , l,:�llIRRD C LtlT 4M R�ILING' LI.� 100.'2 JOP� a 0 OlRIiE1lT TAX 1.AZ7.i7 � �ORIK�9. �Q! � , �II o �;_ ,� _ ,;_., �, _ _ .�,��r�_ 7475 �''�CIEIMY ST SW.E 0ie2 �?.��5 g�� ' TAlOA�LE' 75,10�m PORTLA��l1 @i� 9�223 � � �..�........�..�, �Y�DOO�PST, _�.._ _ ��Ola f�D 1dAI.�E11 '!!.� 334Q iPCAa t00Z �YIST: 023-81 23 619 L,AIm i • �701 C?Ls LOC: ' '.NaMl69! !�i 610(�it � . .�.00iD IE'1' T!n( J�.O� UTt: UT2: A�'�EI:DMTG R(�1i.1. SEOr � 7A0�1lLE �.O�1D 3t 1►ISCAINT 2.�7 ,. ., EMS. RA1fNJ�1D E' P1iY[.�.ES G e�1'.� SALE�G00 0656002! ' �NEMT TAO! l�6�A? 13�F00 SI� 76TN PORTLANit f�' 97223 �W._..,._. � . , , ,, _-_- ...�_. �Ys�b�?597�10 CTL.a''c000 L�O�Ci �T13S ClF.RRYID�RIVE23-St .D �3 e1 IJMO �.ZOiD ��1; 9.QZ7.ZS SN .Mi49900 !�: Ot�R M.D��IIRI. �46,�iQi� IE'�'TAX 1,e27.ZS lIT1 s !Jl'2a i�tEA:IDMTG IRaL SEOs 3'M2! � 73.901! 3�.aISCQlIf 5�.� OTTO, Mfm.TE6� L 11LN1!1711 �i036 001 .3SAt: 0!� 41 C11��EM'�YRX 1.702.�l3 7435,Si! Q�ftY - � . , - LORRI,E.I�IAY �Al.E i1�9� p9?60boF9 Ti�M.E 73.�14 TIGAIlD Oit 97223 _.......,�....�.�-�..�._:�.�,...�� . ..,,,,. .:. _ ,:, �_. ZS9'!DC .�3�11D0 PiLA: 1002 AI51's OZ3-Ot 23.,e1 U� ` �i,'viAl i�W�.OI�1 �'l.0+� K�Y: OA�659T29 CTI.ti L.�: : .A1f00000 IMIP: QOOa1 ?� �.00rI I�T TAX . l9.N _:. UT1 r IiTZ� AREAtDMT,G 6lp.6 ��s 5�3b tIf1�ORLM.� �,000 3�DI9�iiT 2�97 GRAStO IMiEST�HTS o�►OA�C ' C11N�]IT Tl�f X.07 1 A300 SIN CEl1Tt�tY 0Hlt l��Q 6�1SC0 INYESTIEIi't'� i✓Q4-e402S2�3 ' ; TYf�9 AR l7�3 , . � __,.,; .:....��ery��1Y�r... ..�i... .�.'. _.:�... W. ...:.�. ..;,. �.��' ..'�,:........� � �, 2S1 iDC @��r0 PCHa 10�2 AEST: 423-6'� 23 61 �.._�._ L!� Z�61.�O1�Ili�.YMr.iM�l 8,l�S.71 � UT9. � tD'r2: . lWEA�DMTG R�.S. SEA. �39 ' t�r�s.� M.a1Q 3t�I9CalIT ��►"'1 k If�- �!14y��;�38 CTILa I.CCs 13+N5 ?ZND AY� SN JV:0�000 MIO!`-��t rppp�t �1.�-'11r11. 5�.� M.'T� �? SMITH,ct1A�tVIP� i� � E�LEEN .4eRC T�I�E ;•�Cl.if�6��GI,�M'TM� io�Get� , �: . . 13415 .�1 72h1l9�� .:: ��; .---K � > ' �" �, , u T3GARD att 97223 �� . ,. � � �� Y�OOb5��7 CPI.s�'1000 L�i13�S 7�1,DAVE�: 0":S-el �li .,N�100 IN3P: 00011 ,M.�l��.:; Q'rZ�O� �1'?��f�! �A�q� ��'. tJT.t s . R�ALD M �ial1TH E �01 S1RO�L SEA ' �?A[' ,;. ,�� '��i�`21��3e�1I �,�1' .e,1'r�.22 `^;'A�;� �+�pr , ...y , TIGARD QR 97�?3 04�. ,_ w.... . . 1� � s , , ; d.17'7Y��.... . ...,. ... .. ,.. . .�. ..... �, , . .�P t�'� w��ar°� . '�.'�� 4 � . � �fD A� -0� ... ��.�fla.g�.�� 1��E" ��.I��r "'� „k`� , ,� �s .�i res - eso�4ozo �ii000 a��aoe� � . RG�i�oQ47977A .;��(i.'�Y� �`VVQI�7TVS ..I61�N..;�1�. �:..,,. � V�=tlY1lrV� R",�= YW�� '.��war�� a. -� . ..� . ..�. ,r v�r �»�c �o�isoz _ r�: �oez �t�r: az��e� a � e� u�"° ,�:,zoA��,�:, . i.��.� �� _a�:a�rrc �u �a: � �o �e.eM,�,��airrr , st.ti• . � � _ arr � � �r��TM c��r�t.�aE K,�,a��o s��e oa� ,. •�. .�s c�e�rtE�� oc�.eti a�.�r ir�oc :,�.c�z.�c � 4- �rcflaD � �r� � �.e�vzsse3 _ es p�a ' oF E �s �.��u � � �� ,,.� .. : , w �. . � � o�r e4ar�s� ��Q . . ^ . � �•.'��,,i� . 6s �r[a° ia;w,a_--____��---�---� , . , .N;�ae3c a�a: i�o� � ,..s��ra� � `�� . 0 Pt.AIt 1fl02 DYSTa 023-!!1 23 .�t. L1ir�0 S:20a ;; �'�. E.�Mi5: R1t. . �PHYLLIS G 9�sDNiG R�LI� SEOs 5rl�F � 4l�I.E S.ZO� '.f�`l�I9C0lLNT 1?3Wixi � N; ... � , Q�IlIT lri� � ,� 1�.4.l� � I34o 7t�''H Ctl 3�W31 11�1/e1 ACAEA6rE CANECTIOM -i.O�AC � Tt�" OR 97�'?3 I�iP �Dk.`�NI ;'v�` �; �i� ,.. . .:.... . . ....... ....._.. ,........ , ...... ,...„ .. , , ; , . . , , ., .._ � . ,.. , o � � . � , a �..� _.._._.____W - _.... .., .._.. ...:: I ;. , ,.>, �.,.,.�..�,.. . .„: .;, .. ... .._ ,� ,.�,_. , ,,. *#x��t� ��liti� ' .,. . �� .., . _.. � � , � � ..;,. , � OQ IA�E f i =03 i t�3! 3 a� 5�'9 9Q0 t' IlAS� �1 34�p�3B96�00.00 �"aE-0� fi��S!'b. 190!�F��►.�Op; �lASE-O� �5i�1 00 , ��S � l7bt� ' ay p�y� .. . . . �, ; .. ' '- .... :' 00.. , ,,. . S�A� ...Dt��6. 51653�►�Qn ;�ASE-O?.. � .,:IW�E-06 _ . :.�00. � , ,, ,. !!!SC-�! :_ .00 !lM5E-1Q . ':, �.�y��y� r �r. ! ..�.•.e�..,,� . . '.. �' . _ , � . ,. . �tlQ1i �o� VtW. �,. ,,.I�,,,.�. , , . �..'�..�� .. ..,,� " �,'M�1'. O1 i°t� A �IAI�KET. �a'�11 ,r ` o TMlX1�e1G53ei13v0i ' � AD W#l.l'IRF.'M 1�F7;660;6T3.7 S�C ASSM1' �,652;43�F:72!ET TA�t �t SS�313.f 00.�3 3�D �.'.!?�i.3'7 QI�IIT , , ; , .. �+'N.f1�R�1 719 .��7 � v t� � d � � Z i '; r, "�'�i ' ' � � � ', x , ' ' �� , �, � � i �, ,...:, �....._ „.. . .:, .' ��.. ...,' .� ._.. ... . ......... �. � , , ;., . ,.. ...,... ... ... _, .. .,. ;' , , , �i � �� l�V1Y�i� •.mM� •liMWr�� Y�R^ � � �� ' .��I '`fi�4. . ,M,q;5 N Y �N G T�O.N �C 0,�,� '� � � � . . ....,.;: , .: r . ;;. � �l1Pf.R'�"�' 11A1.11E�5,�OR �5►es°a! ' , dri �s�: , OR ,... .'�. ...... . „ . .' .... : , �� .�I: a�ta�t�� ...��,..a� a� �,' w.� ��;� . .. . _ � ` . q -J k 0 ROLL: PARCE.,NtNBER ORDER ----------------------jtIP. R IEGTI ON COUNTY PEATY VALUES FOR 1988.89 ROLL- CONTROL 2911DC 03 1 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023 -81 D 23 81 KEY: 004597 UT2: :5000 LOC:IAAREA:DNTBTHROLL SEO: 58835:00000 NAP: OOPR ENS. RA B PHYLLIS G 1LN3037 1137264 .82AC 13400 S 6TH 97223 KEY :B00459783 CTL: OCC: 270095 SANUMWM,TST023-91 SN JV :16386 NAP: 00009 JAN• AREA :ZFNY ROLL SEO: 58836 UARY LEASING UT2: 1.S9AC 4+ ++++4 ++++4++++4++++4+++44 6645 NORTH ENSIGN JANUARY LEASIN COMPANY 2i86 - 85006243 ATTN: A A PONPEL. JA B OF E 14 2a F.44 -85 0/10/811 SAL! 0285 US$06243 I ND 0 PORTLAND OR 972111 - .- KOPE0fY LAND A VSSED OOPR TAXABLE LAND *ASSESSED TAXABLE 10'10189 27.300 AD VALOREM 117,600 3* DISSCCOUNT _ CURRENT TAX 11.600 PAGE 4423; 29 :..72 2. 87, 5 2,824.37 441,1000 NEVALOREM XX 720,900 34 DISCOUNT 720,900 CURRENT TAX 17,88449.19 535.48 17,313.71 2911DC 03701 KEY: 01014636 C`L: UT1: UT2. TIGARD. CITY OF PO BOX 23397 TIGARD OR 97223 ` IS1 a 023;81 O: 584%.- -91 D RCA: 9152 h LOC: .!:53043 NAP: NOOPR AREA :00 ROLL 'SE , .08AC NON ASSESSABLE ►**fit * * **s AA 84-17376 6/27'84 RAKE NOW ASSESSABLE CO 46668. 1'18x'8: SALE 0479 7901(386 LESS .70AC T O TL 3703 �s E *AS D 0; . 12.216.371 82.21633 366.89 11,849488 2511DC 03702 PCA: 2012 1ST: 023-81 D KEY: 01162280 CTL: LOC: 4V :04057 NAP: NOOPR UT1: UT2: AREA:ZFIIV ROLL 0: 58038 ' EQUITY 775 AC +++++ CCI REAL ESTATE 775 NEC DEC 87-68 720'87 CO 8 +++++ 015'83 FUND, INC BY CAPITAL CONSULTANTS, INC LESS PART TO STREET SALE 0881 91029879 -I ND 0 2300 SN FIRST AVE PORTLAND OR 97201 LAtm BLD-VAL a �.D' TAXABLE 105. N0 AD VALOREM 3117.700 NET TAX 493,400 34 DISCOUNT 493.'500 TAX 2S11DC 03703 KE'9s 01298465 CTL: VII: UT2: ' ►IUBAL. ROBERT R AND BECK. TOM I 7900 SN VARNS POkU.AND OR 97223 PCA: 2012 DIST: 02 -1l1 LOC: JV:00000 NAP: MIOOPR AREA:ZFNY ROLL SEO: 58829 70AC DUBAL, ROBERT R ET AL 4/06 - ,96018143 CO 35051 1'10/84 IFRON TL 3701 SALE 0486 86018143 V PR 0 LAND DLD -VA1. *ASSESSED TAXABLE 129,600 AD VALOREM 1 6.900 NET TAX s7 506.500 3% DISCOUNT 506.500 CURRENT TAX 12,410.70 12,540.74 376.22 12.161.5? 2S1VDC 03800 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-01 D KEY: 00459792 CTL: LOC :13730. 72ND AVE SN JVa80033 MAP :' NOOPR UT1: UT2: AREAsZFNY ROLL 560: 5'8840 r ASSOCIATED COMPUTER SERVICE 1.78AC SALEM FiiEENA'Y SUBDIVISION PO BOX 23097 AND ACREAGE SALE,0000 06140420 PORTLAND OR 97223 LAND BLD-VAL � TAXABLE 329.900 AD VALOREM 449.100 NET TAX 778,600 34 DISCOUNT 778/ 778.600 CURRENT TAX 19,277.82 19.277 578.3 .33 10,699.45 21.11DC 03601 KEY: ' 004591309 CTL :4000 UT1: UT2: PACIFIC NESTERN BANK 1211 SN FIFTH AVE 1400... PORTLAND OR 97204 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-01 LOC: JV:52331 NAP: NOOPR AREA :ZFUY ROLL SEO: 588'11 � CENTER .230CC 1LN300.500SERVICE ++;. :. SALE, 000:1 09470780 y�� LAND DLD: -Vt. TAXABLE 30.300 AD VALOREM 9.200 NET TAX 47.900 3% DI 47,300 CURRENT TAX 1,176.08 1,176.08 35. 00 1.140.80 2S11DC 03900 KEY: 00459818 CTL :4800 KEY. PACIFIC WESTERN UT2: BANK .. 1211 SW FIFTH AVE 1400 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-81 D LOC:7150 5001080RO ST SN JV:45494 NAP: NOOPR AREA :ZFNY ROLL SEO: 58852 1LN3009 __�,.�, .:�rltV��JE CENTER LOT PT 8 2 709. 5. ' SALEM Fi1EENAIP SU86,,VIISION 2.19AC LAND BLD -NAIL. *ASSESSED T AXABLE 364.300 AD NPLOREN 751.600 NET 10X 1115.900 '34 ri6CO NT 1115.900 CUp`+19M8' TAX 27.629.23 27.829.23 020.0 26. x .35 PORTLAND OR 97204 2S11DC 04000 KEY: 00459827 CTL: UT1: SPIEKER 11O'ORD EDDY SOUTHER 0198 5285'SN MEADOWS RD N131. LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 SALE 0000 09390211 PCA: 3002 DIST: 023-81 LAND LOC: JV :59608 NAP: NOCPR AREA :Y2P ROLL SEO: 56643. TAXABLE SPIEKER HOSFORD EDDY SOUTHER 0198 09/83 83039205 N3 9,15/88 DOFE.0653 SU 80/89 7/25/68 B11 519'80 CO 86 -7329 0'1346 ADD. FROM TL 1100 +2.50AC AC CORR . +.18AC NESTEAN INTERNATIONAL PROP 02/86 86007329 SALE "0998'08039205 V ND si' 2S11DC 04100 PCAt 2002 DIST: 023-01 KEY: 00459836 CTL:4000 LOCI JV :45494 UT1: UT2: AREA :ZFNY ROLQ.' SEO: 58944 PACIFIC WESTERN ,BANK. a.N3009600 SERVICE CENTER PT LOT 4 1211 SN FIFTH AVE 1100.: SALEM.FREENAY SUBDIVISION 1.20AC PORTLAND OR 97204 SALE 0000 09820!33 680.600 AD VALOREM 16.'851.39 680.600 NET TAX 16.851.39 600.600 34 DISCONM 505.54 CIURRENT TAX 16,345.85 2S11DC 04200 PCA: 2002 DISTI 023°81 KEY: 00459045 CTL: LOC: UT1:.... .. UT2: AREA:ZFNY ROLL SEO: ROBINSON. E LEE LOT.PT..1 . 15303''. NM NEST UNION RD 72ND BUSINESS CENTER PORTLAND OR ►7229 E2 8/24411 LESS Ti. 4201 .55110 DIST: 023-01 KEY: 1366462 CTL: LOC. ,N: UT1: UT2: AREA 201 PCA: 2012 : ZFNY ROLE: 5EO:. X50846 . 2S 'I DC 04 ASSOCIATES. LTD �,'.88C,. ,PT. LOTS ,1;AND 2 72!10. BUS CEHTEV! AT�TEN MICHAEL PALMER . + BS 11,30,677. 1990 9 ,9 "BUNDY DR SUITE 600 C7 85-24567 12/1285 FROM TI 1200 ANGELES CD 900255291 M,AI.E;0605 05024567 t U®; O 5JVa19020 • 144 +++ 44 CO 85•29567. 12/1245 SALE 0790 80024225 V ND L ILNAD NRP NOOPR TAXABLE NAP: N49PR ijilljESSED TAXABLE 2S111,C 04300 KEY: 00459854 CTL: UT2: ROBINSON.. E' LEE 15'303 1111 NEST UNION RD. PORTLAND OR 97229 PCAd 2012 DIST: 02381 LX: �i AREA :2FMY .. ROLL SEO: :5!847 J .. I1a LOT PT..2., ALL 3 1.00619b2' 72ND BUSINESS CENTER SYSTEMS . TIMBERLINE SYSTE 02 8'24'80 CO .05- 25567 12#12485. LESS TO.::TL4201 403AC ADD TL 4400 4.SOAC SALE 0700 80024225 V NE L,.,, 2S11DC .04500,, 1 4. br 199.700 A9 VALOREM 4,944447 199.700 MET TAX 4.940.47 199.700 3% DISCOUNT 148.33 ,CURRENT TAX 4.756.14 16.600' no VALOREM 16.600 MET TAX 411 401 48.01 10.600 34 DISCOUiI 12.33 CIfENT TAX 3'18.68 LA011. 88.900 AD VALOC 4 10.104.3) 11.0-VA L, 319.200 NET TAX . 10.104.37 *ASSESSED 408.100 34 Disown' 303.13 TA»1LE 508.100 011 1(U TAX 9.801.26 LAi h NAP: FOR 776.'. 0 NET V .*. TAOIEM 22.8p.82 22,863.02 3fb58S5E., X123/' 00 34 DISCOIJi9' 685.09 TA ABLE ?23,:00 .QMI NT Tit 22.171.13 31012'.: DUST: 023-01 D 5 , o A D AVE SN . JY2 34030. NAP/ .. 010001. I 1 '.000 AD VALOREM 43,562.05 .1400 'MET .'TA C.,.. ,43 :562.05 cf; A I a f- I r I S W. COR '' PET, R NJILTiwm' 10rITrott 7d 702 � r X04 SEE MA 2S 1 IDA 1 4.5 3' Re2.to.Itd Tiro. Ce.116: 6o. 2071 No.112 13 9.7$ — 123.4 311 620 706 0 In 4 44 14: STRt 606 610 615 132 30.03 !tl.OY. �.... Nn. ©71 'IR • :�G S •:� •4$'t , ”4,sli " _NQ accts._ CANr2LLED 'TAX LOTS 100,3901,12OO,3301 T00,600,4400,4600, I N INITIAL PAINT :�e9 °I5'3T"w M S ' /S 3T r' 179.93 EAST l.2i ON NW C0 GOVT. LOT 4 t0 3703 37030 . »�c. 1.59Ac. 3101 2 421'5 N 69'24':w 310 c.r ors,* .1%. NO. 2071 $ 414 °4` '11, "%v TO NUeLIE' .1.1/711, SANDBURG STREET g '4 GIWi� 50 3 284' 13' E X510 3800 /,711,4c. .23 4c FROM: Tigard Plana RE a CPA 89 -07 /CC 89--07 MBTZGE1 MS request§ approval, Comprehensive :Plan.' Iel%i meat Isom (C rcial "Pro i ssional) rcial' Professional) Density residential and', a One C1 Oage::�,fr ,' CAP' � -P eidentiaZ Come rcial to R -28 ( p ��5 un, aore),� , ft� a� , ( ;. �� ys�ional) , OCATION: `Week side i `of. 'SW 72nd ,A �enu®,,'�� between .:SW Verne Pr+ofe � � k ' . ,, S 't r ;and SW Fir Street �W 281 i st tax Scats " 800 'ic 803, 2 1 1 C: t 600 .. � r�eeiaw. from: Attached is the ;Bites, Plan and applicants statemaen for tr� information aupplie't by various departments an agencies .' end from other' information; avail'cle to our staff, 'a report and ' reocaursndation .will; be ,dad on. they pro sal in th4 near. future.=` prepared � � and �a� deci ®�.�n will , �►;� rende� I If you •'wish , to ,� comment, iqn this a aplit ation, 'We' Y'our, mss: bg;� ' .9139, You May,. use thei space provided .below or, !;attach. ,a separate better to return '. ►our comm+e:nts . - :.9 . �. h ' � T 44 date please phony }he etaf f contact, noted belpw with your coiaa nts and confirm yon' co a►ente, in writiiL �►s soon as ' possible. If you have any queietiona' regardiii this 'matter, contact the Tigard planning Deperti oxit, PO '`Box 233.9?. 13125 ti. Ball Blvo` , , Tigard, `®R 97223. P.MOICE: 639 - 4171. SGAFF CONTACT: Jam, y t,±fie ...� , = PL' ASE CJNECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the) enclosed letter. Written Comments: NOT11FICATi0N > LIST FOR NPO No. TY D TART o, r� Building, Inspector /Brad C11(4 RecOrder. 7 Engineering/Ceti ;A • V CIAL DISTRICTS ,,. Z Fire District . d (pick-up box bl illommgammico igard' N D 8841 SW Commerciale Tigard, OS.. 9722 ,11 ►r . AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use 6 Transp. 150 N. First Ave. 1Ki .hsboro,..OR 97124 Brent Curtis Kevin Martin Paula Calvin City of Beaverton 2 Jim Nendryx PO some 4755 4755 SW Griffith' Beaverton, OR 97076 State Highway Divisioa Lee 'Gunderson PC Box 56 Beaverton, OR 97075 . SPECIAL, AGENCIES General Telephone Ed Wilaott 12460 SW Main Tigard, OR 9722::' Notthweet'Natural Gas Ronald D. Prlv!t PE, PITS 220+ 'NW 'Scoaad �►,v :l Portland`. OR 91.209 Pacific Northwest nti1` (0251P/021P) °arlcr R ecreation Board Curtis o11oe Lchool Dist No. 40 'f'eaverton) Jour PO Box 200' Beaverton, OR 970. 5 cb of Dist. No. 233 I�Tigard 13137 SW .Pacific 'Hiyo Tigard, OR 97223 Metzger W.D. -Other- Boundary r'o iezcoat 320 SW Stark Roos 530 ifilleboro, ,OR, 97124 METRO 2000 SW 1st Avaa 'Portland, OR 97201. -539E' Other Portlannd Gener8i E1ecttiac Sim J'otineo I' Portliut4 General E1e�trit ].65'5 0� Old Srchol`lse�cr evegf'tot OR 97001 Me +to a ,itan lk ea coseonieations T'vi.x� Oaks Technology Center 18 . Nib 169th 'P , ee, S8-01 �672O eavetton�,# i OR 97000C�- 4-, 714 it is the desire — Council to provide a rwoaroe to ass - of City ore urge vq when there are any questions. Theref Newton, Contriuniicy Relatiorz Coordinator with any questions o[r conowns 13125 SW ail Bikt ,O. Box 23397, Tigeir(21,10!et;j0t) 97223 orhost:ii Tigard Oregon 97223 : February' '2 1990 City Council CiVic, Cer.ati:?r City of Ti,c31,ard,, Tida.rdi Ore0Fin.,\.9722,11', ayor Edwards and. CoUnciI.o,rs: It has .cOme to my attention that 'ny testiony at a h, 989 publ ic , hearing regarding CPA p9-67 /2,C 89-O .ai not , •a.ccuratE"I.y represent. the majority; ,st.ntiment. of. Istp() $iS. Ir. our meeting of Movembe, 15';, 1989 copy' of , minutes enc,1oSed) Lhe NPO went on record as";(4).j,e'cting to the proposed comprehensive plan' amendment and zone change. Consequently. the membership of the NPO and ,I , wish tOIhave si ttlat ion clarified for tlak....= record*. Concerned , members have been told that because no obJ€t3.on were presented at. the fia1 hearing (although minutes of the NOVralf,tber 20th hearing record receipt of objections) there, is no basis; for appeal Moreovere there is a frustration with the appeal period .,Sotnehaw having been shaoir.'teried to twenty-one (21) 'from tiii.i‘ty ,( days. If it is possible we would like to hiLVe the counit wei these , 'natters and notify us in It/rit,-Ino if ttei dcison' ccp,tzlci 1e Thank you for. your a.ttention to t..his matter. I 1 1 , ■ ( C e I. e 1 Y a t, 1 , Craig Hopkins Chat"... NPO 115 Fq 1 GI'i8ORHOQD `P t P,PO #5, rrcc %t in .the' C`ommun:ity development Conference Room 'on iti`,•; . reii-ei 15,. 989 at � 40 pr 'r P;�esent were;° Doty.Hawl "ey., c;:�l:sns' P1scIS'inr+on. Sc amidt:.;and ,Takaha:sh Com unity Relions Deve l opmer'�� t'` Director' iai z Newton was a. * ue,s onset "of our meeting, ttnutes f the rious aneet;. nv '`we a circulated ,that' evening noted 'that ker .. Hawley a ad Hopkins excused for that 'meeting With no other changes the minute, wt reM; ar;} roved as circulates Unfinished 'business C ,9--07: '.Chis . item vii 1 be• heard. by the Cinty Council' on November 2.a: 1c9.8 ►. After .'.the Planning Commission -1 to uphold the CP' zoning cry this' p'alwcel', ve�tezd 5 tf*•e e�evel- oper met wri th an ad hoc cammn tt et of ad,;i,oining. property owne�tl�� .and; openee d.i,scussion o.rn items_ which were cif concern. "those beimt berming a,nd setbacks .. A coveanants and, °res'r,.ic- �' seised on as a ossibili "ty. ct t;+`te ` id t commented on nYnn � "�._ ��e n I , U o x n exam eme ions ae� p the. lack of designate'�'i area for container enclosure. .fh,is neglected item sometime re�:uits i;n loss of •parkiing spots fo'r' the, complex Discussion, on :his it ,m was Yesngth however. f.he consensus of the memberfs present wvas `that the drigi.nal ra.tiona,le �f'or :his zoihi.ing still stands and' that thi�t. ;• mu'l t i -family hoes ins+ needs exr�ress`ted as a change it7 c. i rc tms'tance are bei • � `n0 adwq:at ;el}e, rne44 in 'ether. parts e:�f our ' city's 'devi ?lopmea t . ,nclue ing NPO 'kt`i . H'ember Ha'�`le'y lhoted also ghat 72nd Avenue s' oilmen a.. ollvector does " devel ¢ � a maio.r c not' seeem �c,ongruent w tY�` a ma`jo d.evel.opment such as this is: I3. The, EOC PrroPosal mentioned ?l:t tree last me ting is now ready to, be added to the Planning Coc,ca Section New business: A. NM)..P 89-17: Stanton /Larson.,. This is a minor and partition to divide a 1.10 acre pai cel into 3 parcels at 15740 SW 79th., This area is zoned R-12 but w y d i Will l a kel be deve 1 o'ped in lesser density Other` business: ` e antics ate the normal hole °da cures and are :..ncel into `ai�� p � °' Docethbr.r meet ng which would fall' on Dec:embet 20 If ,`pressing i terns tieed our attention, wee wi ;� l' be called by C �a .r Hopk.ins,. Thanks ivih and I-Ia I-fe 1 1d S q Ap'l Y r W� th Ll at . we adjourned 'at 9:20 p: '.. I~t:`sesctfuly submittet,!. j� win ,� . �„ Su.„, Sharon Takahashi Secr-etary, 14P0 #5 7610 S.W. Cherry Drive Tigard, OR 97223, • 03110re bersive Plan hterldinent/Zone alange Metztger/Erts - 89-27 Dear i a Takahalli: Thank you for your letter dated January. 19, 1990, co1cern1ng the abc refe,renaed 0:alprehensive Plan Areendmerit and Zone Ctlanro request,: It is unforiainate that there appeam to have been a iniscalaniunictttlon, of #59s position during the public hearing. The public hearing viaS , Closed on NOvembzx 20, 1989. The oloportmitir to appeal is issue, as I understand the process, has passed. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 2339 Vflgard Oregcm 97223 ) '417 r • ro • C 761 Q SW' °Cherry Dr v;e Ta�gard Oregon''.972;2'3 January 19 a. 1990 Tigard; City 'Counc. l Civic Center Ti' ara', Oregjon 97223 ;t. ;ayo r E wards and Counci embers: a A,s a member of NPn #5' and a prper'ty owner' in `the` t►.O lihq iiills Subdivision, 1 an',, . asking tra t. you reconsider, th.e decision to grant the' coiupreh6nsive ptan amendment and zone chance '89-2' which was ,approved''' on , Nov4mb'er 204, 1989 In the', `publ T, c hearing that evening. NPO 115'S position. was given int° publ.i.c" record.` "as being in favor ofy,. the, "ctanges. In fact.,` at its 'm,eeting held the Wednesday' Prior.' the consensus ''`,of those present' was 'that the �-c comprehensive plan be upheld',as, the Planning .Comnission" had, ruled previously been'� de �1wc�.�ed to cit Our minutes reflecting 'our opinion had y hall . on Sunday, November 19", and had been " received .by the city staff on November 20. This zone change has been a highly contested proposal and in. investigating : the;`haappenings on the . even ng of the council meeting. 1 was appa l l ed to find that the testimony credited to NPO chair Craig Hopkins did not mesh with our meeting y affected • state his opinion eetina proceedings �qr, HopkA�as� .is, a clo ert owner,_, and is entitled to pin on!f the pr'oP Y Project in an individual c;1`,acity. As the chair of .'the NPO, however, i believe he must represent the findings of the i'1PO. f This he did not do. Community relation: i'lrfxf i�u� oewosi on inust,ra� ear teatnpprdec d us in the ubli record on the evenin of '` the f iina,l hear rice our ci o , Pp P s x'a g o a. ea recommendation I waa s �.ljmauid t; te�di.m ', z rthoec raeti'wtais c i NO a 1 oin b jecthteion` :recordr ed. seems that Cb ttncxlr ,Schtkrt thought thls onus m. accoding the minutes . tIo t � ` • g ss�xe having two , pp P sides . We have keen toad ;that in order to appeal the decision," we needed ' be in. the final heari,ng to have had eus objection read into the record. Is this situation correctible? 1 would appreciate hearing froi Yo u as soon k.,s possible. Sincerely yours Sharon Takahashi Secretary, NPO #5 t 1: C G.7l ncil wit�1 site "selection inCi meted several =cams . traffic impacts and the need to locate trarisit . f acil ,. to es in ; areas • ch haVe expwzienced the Bost growth. Mr. Walsh advi.sed it was • . ; • alters ti es e 7 still early erux�gh to consider - other t:o�,trc.a consensus this issue more the ro ghly l`D ' 3'ie near was to review the , fixture. 6.1 Arcacove Council Minutes: October 16 'St 23 1989. 6.2 Request league of Oregon Cities' Sup �on Position with laktp3t Board Concerning Mandatory Bargaining . l��.ions � IsII•- :lution No. 89-88 89 82 ect�ng to elution No. •- 6.3 ACOV[3 Amendment • Expiration Date of Library Board Appointees - Resolution: 89 -89 • m 1'�:.CP k 8-0'7 ' A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amknamant from Ccumerc KL1 Professional to I diem -High Density Residential and a Zone Change from C -P (Commercial Professional) to R-25 (Re.sidential, units/acre) fc r approximately 5 acres. LOCATION: 72nd Avenue, between SW side of West s Z��11 �B/ Fir Tax Lots 800 & 801, SW Var'ns '..:Street :and �"[�d Fx.r Stree (�":�I� 2S1, 1DC, Tax Lot 3600) . a s Public Hearing Conti.nued, fruit November 1989 b. There Were no declarations or challenges. S Planner Liden: in staff's c inion • .the by • stent tk�, Std policies • • Y Pi pa `c„arm�ation Senic�a application the T� -ehensive Plan; ! tar�-�;1 criteria; o tained iii ''1 ai xl the C7acm uni y Deve . 'fit Cfode . a, resi \two Pert-Yr- ctre caw property ' dst. be mare ccziatib1e to ng Threei ghborhoocPccrosed is' ,ztitinanr4''',,„',':,incisting ' ''' z i1d •*serVp. Roli effective transition .ti, apii,t--1 Preserve ' the tini. as an , i on zcr " z e ing' ,,,, ,i'rea 'and prew_j further pressure' _._' convert the neighboathood into a cxmlnexcial zone , The proposed 1.1,,, zone Would alloy the Preservation' of the rfajcwity' of the ezdstirig treas,lian-the east end of the ProPrt3r. There was an abindande of Ccitemerical-nvfacSional,land in the Tigard Triangle and immediate area However, in this sane area, there ,t4.7,LS no Iraiti-family /and to wppoott, &iid callt)lenrr'-rtC., the ocuiraettial devel oStoent.. - The need for riulti-family Was a , pparent when ocuipP,real to similar area; 1 ,, i.e., Kruse Way clVelopment. , The applicant has worked closely with the neighbors to create high standards of develsitcment issues of colt",1e411 have been discussed and resolved including: density, ' site layout, buildi.ng ' quality and designs. parking, landscaping, beds for, tyreateti privacy, traffic circulation, , recreational facilities,, Site lighting, mAintenanoal and specified hoUrs fit& garbage pick up definite The proposal 'responds to the definite cattrarlity need for affordable zmilti-family hdutintl on Tiwzd'S east side. David, Metzger, Rt. 4, Box 267C, SivmwOrd, Oregon „ advisedthe , 1 property was owned by his ,tinily s He said this was a high- . quality development and said he lob in fa7AV,of the refatieSted arderxtritnt. Ralph Talaran, architect, on the project frtin coAtt, 31,355 S.W. the sal as Boones Ferry Road, Lake t)svo4o, proposal submitted previously to the planning Octortibsion meet S all requirements of an R-25 zone.,,, He reviewed the imildihg, design With Council: VEIvIBER 29, .1909, CITY COUNCIL the R-25 dens t*4A7, „: ' 'ussicn' Ana ents oft `= ;hair. He noted ain�itially a neic ?rs: felt R� 25 wa.�) 1�avz ' as i, at;id. a ec an area. ice' adviiied the neighliotho6 . cont ` to, kesep an' y mind and calked to the appiic�ult a n� of wings. A design nejotiated whichx .appears `to work' for the' ppi feet 'most of the concerns of the 'r�pighborhocd. a lican�t and Deed restrictions havre been drawn up which *ill , re ed 1 should the Zone change he , apgtoved. Basec , c.,ni these representations, 'he.. noted that he has been Y er ni strong c�ppcsitici to suitsorctof the 4 je . He said while he does not represent the n 4igt iovd,. -two neighborhood meet. held with attendance of over 40? at "a about 20 "" at' the other. Ot' those atterxli g most axe neutral or positive with one or ' tWo still hei t"vet reluctant - - , the''''' ,zonie change . Con nainity De ese Director rioted' -the, Plannii j' iori recalimanded der. l Z .ey' ' ;v+e not seen the latest p 'oposa perhaps' would 'change their., tion based, on the °ranges; He advised the only beforeri.i. definition. Any afooetreolto made, been -thell,44artiesi is, strict]y 'a i addlart 4t, �ivate . �•�; the, C�. his no aut.`a;,'x to circa �� gate private a�reect�nes`rts. T,;o , City has nnt, reviewed “ the site, plan and there may be some ctian ges., amended the neighbors and der topers,: far negotiating i their ss . Council Questions/Comments: Councilor Sdr . advised he was surprised . at the p l c testimony• he oxpett,ed there to be ititn tip the Proposal. He too, said he thou, t it was commendable _` that the neighborhood and developer were able to work . through their issues. He mid that he t there was enough spp demonstrated t, elements of , '∎ aive Plan to make this change rftXXl that he uld vote favarab ; n the applicant! s c and •t. . . i the a l�.cai9t � �.rd the r,�grc�men�s reacted' were �ettn�c:en o Cxiunciltar �ad� xa rep. ,exat�d the . . neighbors; t e Ci y is not. ,a -party, to that agreement. The Ci A - . based 0 the c onT cents , he ty ttox� heard Q. testimony, there Ex� Ch oCd J� were petreetbidf, s they homed. She cautioned this ' may` be the case. Also, Council's action tonight d not have any bearing ion the y �' ricti.c�r�sR 7Che site deve'Lat P�'o�`ss deer has . not diet begun for staff' review and there may be f rthe cha ff to ass re plxarte with the Code,. She advised in reading the lni sites frc�ini. the: Planning Commission, their deliberation appeared to bee on comments made by the neighborhood at that ' finis. 'AS stated, 'e� Community Deveic rent , Director, the. Planner Cammissioi C COUNCIL MEE ThG MIND ES - N0MBER 20, 1989 AGE T: ''W consideration kay t'�aunci3: Gerald Edwards, Mayo cal0.1.20 CITY COUNCIL MEMNG . MINIMS ^- iICEP. 20, ;1989`' - PAS � �i DatC ' Prcposai. Si as Pr�DV :ded `toy' DLCD" iY 1s)1 t �tiupst � e h i� t • L' e t 5 1+ t'. S � `t+ w y �tl '" i't te- ,ea,t '„;:t j Ty ekttof r, Adopted Acti.anw �Y'(,C ec :a� C �1�� f% f C e 4 J+ ,e r x cy6 r w f r a✓ l I� Nx`v°'{ _d1 � r� "ir �, f 1 ti� � 'si'f't} tY,,�,e,i, +?�x ��Y � r ��y '` i' •� � � ; + 9u ,_++ }^FU"r�`T "�� ° n �5:. f• i Comprehensiv . iS � t e lan: Aimendment' .gulmarY of Adoptedi .Action (A brief description is adequate. n Ple se r° highly technical'. terms and `'zone.'code` abbreviations: Please ,do 'not 'writes' "see attached.'"): Describe Sow the Adopt'aIt sZmendeeet Differ() from the, Pr ®posal (I' same, write, "Same . " If it was not proposed,! write "W/A.'°) If the Action A eer,ds the Plan or Zone Map, Provid€ the Following Infommlikion for Each Area Which , wds Caiunged (Provide a separate sheet for each :area. Multiple sheets can be submitted ' as ' a single' adoption action. Please include street address whenever possible., *4o not use tax lot number alone.): Previous Plan Designation: COMMERCIAL_ PROFESSIONAL Pre' ious Zone: C -P : (COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL Location: (WCTM 2S1 1 ,DIUM HIGHfDENSITY , RESIDENTIA New Zone R -25, (Eg IDEN 'IA . d. 25 UNITS /Ate', );. MT ,: NIDE OF '..: SW 72ND AVENUE EE'l E N TIARN8 Y Ato FIR- sTREETS , imp, TAX L( IS 800 & 801; WC1741 2s1,.1DC, TAX Ac: eage Involved: 5.03 ACRES Does t :i's Change Include a Goal Exception? For l esidential Changes Please Units Per Net Av,'re Previous Density: NON- RESIDENTIAL DES ItmATION' � �I I�. ... u! .,. . �. 1 i t 1 u.. � ., �e, I . L �. r.1... ...... ,.. V .. CITY OF GARD OREGON ORDINANCE NO 89- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING- FINDING E'k AND CONCLUSIONS AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REr,ItiESTED BY ,METZGER, AND -EMS,:'f CPA 89-07/ZC89-O?) itigAE.1, the applicant haw, requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Commercial Professional to Medium High Density Resident4e1 on approximately 5.03 acres and a zone change from C-P (Coiamarcial ,PrOfesttdorial) to (Residential, ' 25 units/acre); and WHEREAS, the Planniktg 'staff made recommendation' of findings to the -,City O , Tigard Planning Commission at a pubii..tc hearing on October 3, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public healri.t,t,q on the proposed changes, on November 20, 1989 to review 1.1anni.ng staff anca Pianr:5,ng Commission recomiLittnciatiorle as well La El public testimony. NOW, TEUCRIZFORE, THE CITY OF TZGARD ORDAT:ia :X FOLLOWS: SL'CTICiN 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria based upon. the faets, findings, and conclusions noted );)elow: FACTS Location 13265 SW 72nd Avantie. Approximately 5.03 eir.ires located On the ,west side of SW 72nd ,Zivent.te, 'between /31,! yarns Street aid ' Street „(sciell vicinity maps Page 10) • WcTz4 241' '111)B, .Tax Le.11.1.8 sop and 801; •triCtiki$,,,281, Tax Lot 36061 (portion). • BacT,v.sround Information " cration of tax lots 800 and 801. from a, single parcel v;as, approved. thxough Minor Land Partiti.on MLP 1-81. The Plan and zoning 4, designations i:sar these parcels warm changed from R-7 (IblOsiderit144 7,500 square feet minimum 10t size to their current Coarneral Prlafessional/C-P designations during, city-Wide Plan and soni.ng, map, revisor a in 1983. No other previous: land use or development applications rittgarding these, 4 h d by the City. • vtcinitv propeez,..es have beer& reviewe y Information , Adjacent properties to thelnOrth, west., and southwest are toned ‘h; (Res den 1.4, 3.5 units pe, acre) deVe.,,10Po, taint 1,, residences, PropertiAs aireCtly south of the site are at*1 ',dm-0 an are presently vacant or occupied by single ,,tireperties across W 12nd avenue from the site are also zon theicle. properties are developed with a number of office Containing a variety of commercial and prOfeadiOnaILUSieliIhr,','::', • ORDINANCE NO ,1189- Page 1 ' , • • 1, ,■„„ , I' the 811 ec r,a ite Avenu LB fudcti;nally City' a Trani, rtation feet of pavement, crba, e ong the Bite °c frontage. Tine a fie han; slightly more t Street. SW Fir Street ^conainte way which dead 'e ids' into ;the dr vewave A: ee;C of : tY;ont. ap. SW, '72 rip` dlra tta reetl.ghto an f00 feet o£, ront et . o f 'gravel: es.'.den e the 'cite. ¶: a Traneportation Plan Map ,,dcteignatea "SW l ei rat feet. pwhy d zlr ed '`1i caul �sttreete t ypical1 feet of public .right -of -way improved wait ► full et ceet w. as a al 0ov red ''` r ewe: 41 S 1 te Inform" ton .arc. �Rrovoaa? eecri t«ti'on tliea sou r' Street ri ceaaiet ' roieeitentd The eiublect pr opezty doneints of . three apptc0i4.P.ate i 5,.03 :acmes,, ncludr�:no' a ,15.5' foot ' by aectiicsn r.isf tax, lot' 3600 between ` Fir street. and the oth tr i; vcilved dree"is: The remainder-,,of taxc. :10i 13600 is _+mot ' i.nclude is : thoif props aed ^ p;i n '!Meg+ :` Amencdment and ��ae `whaagte pr,aposa l Tax lot 800 Contains �ai'nt' a ituusein nOrtheantert, aorn�►t.. Thee other^ parcels are vac:aant„ ; Thai site contains '' a eve ._.'Yof, ttr,aae'; ,in ..the ncrrthem.aterp corner of the site 'The ^ ,remai tiler r',f .tkc . ®.te'. iax' l mostly ��ith' rasses, we .. open' rind eovorecl � g e� ®•, ,' end'; f%!�a'it �'re+ee;e Tae .par�o�la� a�re' relatively fiat with ,a, alight e1,:�p0 •tolwarde ',taxi ibailt. The applicant i tequer_ a P10;o, r 'Map mend rt ,frees' Coararieroia1 Professional to Medium High Deneiay ^Residents aal afld a z �A r. , c mirage . trom r ^ o. P proEeeeional/odoj.nietative t.1fA, r ce Cc YI► rc• . . ,o �� . (Multipl . , Family Re'identiz l VI:. Per . Acrey for the ' Bubje ;, acc� �ln.. ,, Although a develo ant j:ian ter the 'r l need ;hot � ,�submittnd l„oi • a. propoeea plat 'i /tone chatage, a concek�tua+�,;� bite ppl+ ►. ihlurif:rating how he eito might bet d velo w . �1 with a mwxlt�.le- fannill xi<:�eidlertt$1 e�evelopment;" has been proidea by taro applicante. The appliClant'e ' intent , in providing the concoituaal ai.te plan waei to illustrate. , that a ; > uXtiple= family development which wou,td comp;.' }+ '1,4147,b,, the C unityr' iavelo ni C e' �Cude ity t � n + o, rctauld .be 'acouet+ ctad on xt,h ( fig, ^. x�ar�sit on tic. ire �.. 5�4��i.04® �� r� 'iraae that area wxthii.t�, .1Q�� an estab?l )!she' arcae Ynct' be de eloped. att a t eridt#,Intial ' denei than 125 percent c)f the allowed dGnei„ ;' (.„4,1:',,':' epecifi; ►ed Comprehensive Plan deeignati.on La *,,her t 4 ., ,\ie' cu. ,ant 46,41.c atition) of .he adjacent eeta bliioksaf reaasicla<�yr ° ,�:), -. Bub. �^�it � > °® rL-titos arenas wihlhfti 100 feet o' the 'R ®l1l _ $ebdiviei.on to the north and 'wrest could not be 0ve1ope' at , a c ee greater then 6.25 u aita3 ger acre eause axiu. ni t 10 m #�s 5 urit�ia L acre it:y Residential deeig�t> tiers as ' i %d to'; i tiI. ,.Lfig'; Mi the P1arn Imo. Y.. raft �z.�a► ^i»n br .� B. FINDINGS MM`D C USIONS The relevant `ritoria in thin case are ` SL teuide 12, and 13; TiGLwrd ComprebensiVe Plan;, policisp 6.5.1, 6.6.1, 7.1. 2, 7.2410 7.4.4, 1.6.1,4 CRDIN1 NcE No.. 69 as • ;.s Fla 4 ♦ .. • rid ' <chapterr .onal Criteria ap. amendment criteria cif , both eveIopi ent Code. • The hol ity Council `.. ;conriludes ghat' applicable Statewide Panning Gval.e` f indinge a ''''� the change ,or mistake az!ehena re .; Flan as uaic ii urt oiao t�l , `,3s cons t. tent wi dal nee' basted upon the; fo Goal el (citizon Involvement) i fl : mat: citizen invol,ve*snt program; ino jading applicatLine by Neighborhood Manning kiddition,: all 'public notice,srequiremente application. ` becauee the City has adoptc a ; review of all; devea of ant: Crgani zat "i.one (NPA) jha a been satisfied foi this gal #2 (Land Ube Planning) in met' becree^ the City h-ae applied a.l applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive an Pohicies, and commuatty Development Code requircementar to the review, of the propoeai,. Goal s (Economy of the stmte,) a eatiefie" props aa:L would cedut;e the : Ci. j ' e .,inventory of deveaojpable , "coiR,ia ici a2 1a d, becaure the reducton zord land popseto s . amount Compared to the I total ar Unt of developable -P ` zOnesi Land in they ipmediat a��ea add the Tigard 7�riangle areal ;wind :) alio�ti'ng i *.,lt .- family ! CTT-P aeYd ; -P zoned ,developable prcpertiea .any provide Han an attractive mnix of land Ueee thereby !Bpue.';',COtieterOiall. and i,nduetrial development in -ti he ` area. Oith +r ;coninunttiees . hav►e shown ., that ouch a mix of land ueee can 'eucceee� ,gu11y co- c xiet without adveroe3.y affecti' g ,commercial or indu ®trial growl h. the alavlieante save poin e d to the noighsboring :Kruse Way area of take . Oswego were ;'ouch a n%ixture of land use a exiete. Goal 4.:0 j•Eo�a®ng ie east p' ... ) ®fled becau cse �Dae r sea, will r�►3�de fq�i� additi rs�al housing oppor'tunttiee ae promote ' by the Clty'e comprehewz 1. a Plan and Lie Metropolitan Mousing Rule : (oregon Rd 0i0i,st: native Rules, Chapter fi b, division 7) App>±o�ra? o E the �properlal wa�sl�i increase hf u ing cppor-tunirt ids, on .0o.' + i,ty';e► develo abia re tirde a ial la,+nde by a 'of. i2 dw tilling u its 7�pp�eoval mould al�ja', p, ovide increased oppottunitiee ruit , famLly Mettopolitan that City 3.eapa hou ®ing �ertta` Tne f fair developable _ ►rid s f 1.0 u. t per .acr+ ,and 'a tninis►u 50/50 opportunity mix • for �i3,ng1e fam J y end a n ' i,=� a,..aiik` houe trio . Goal 0:11! ("e00 portaitior) itnd Go it \77"13 (iltera ;r Cc' �i nation) .would ire- n sakiefied through prov4di4ig the oppilrtuni tV for an intensive `'land. use near, major tranepartation corridors : (}iLghwlLy neap eniployment cent ®re Thiti . promc'►t en of ficieat 'use' of' th; traneportation ,system trier "'ehy nrciac�►t�Log �ehergy <conae ati+ai br „ .. The CLty Council had date :mined that the p *opoeal ie nOnnie t� e aj licaktle portiorte of the Cmpreheaifi + ' Plan bast d. upon the' finditing below: ORnINANc,I No. B9- Page 3 VI 1? O 2.1.1 ood Pi,an'r' Policy = �atie,�ed {; becaugey,� "Ne;Zghbor�: , ��Platua ®rg . nizatian #5 and eurxa ;aun .thg° property, owners °w ire t' ► i gven inolt ' a� he :, ar ng and an opp° i yip e;i; ce`'' o; ' a�ddition�� thae „'apglican$ h;av(� .`m'�,'; with` 'thy+ in�aed ete . nei.gh,ibre cif {thy & to 'to ;,iresent their rr �ropo�etal in advance of th, 03',..,, public hear �ngs. Dian Policy 6.1.1 ie satisfied becaalee the propo�al would'r pro�►id&' th' opportunity for addit3 ono multi- fa�ily develapi nt and incr�ea0: the .net Housing opxrtuni `y on builo�abl+e.' lands the C,itys . Th1e �� i dRtailed inn +hag, discu0eio4 f ©r Statewide &`'Lynn ng (Goal, 10 !above anal th attached .'memo regarding the effect of :' tooth , cu'rrent plan %zone.. admen proposals on ` the City' i coiap`liance 'with tr:4e Metropolitan Ro n3.,0 Rule. . • Plan:. polio'iez G.3 2 atd .3.3 will bp, Hat .efied 'bei�auae they; p6`apoeal would 'allow for devel ;opnent of 'the: properties in' 'ways that maw :bed more compat le' with adjacent eetablinhed lob .density. 'r ®r� t *r eat al areas tb an the currently perin'itted ueoe of , 'the -'P 'zone wo ld ' be. 'utude reeidentia3 .svelopment o f the :paL *ae1n wild.; be i abject to density terns Lion. liinitatione within 100. feet of the Low .Density Reeii ential Plan deai nested ar�eae to the north sad west of the site. "These limita►tLonz would tend, tai le Hen irnp+:acts" on adjacent prs`perti es' to : a ' . greatei, exteht than Code rea u remente applicasble+,; . to develops nt; ^Pro x�aa3�a iundler the current Plan 'tad, zone deae aationar . 8oth ' the axi sting C -P zoning c eeignation and :'. thee px oponed ' R-25 ;zon .ng designation allow a maximum • building height Qf A fe :set,. The C P zone r c�.uix eaa Z0 foot a Lde yard and rear yard setbacks ° 'f om residential. c A acid thus under the current *oning .designation, 'a , 45 foot tall budding could be ; conBtructed within 20 feet of the abutting developed residential parcels. Because the ddncity transition x®auireiaeate'',of Polia'y. X6.3.2 (a) and Community Aevelapment ode Sectia�n 8 �0: X14'0 (,a) would apply if the properties were zoned R =25 s i,t ier . flhikelyn that mu1tim family residential. buildin+ga taller than two" °e'tsiriee tali. woulld; be' built within 00 feet of the ;:properties' bouridarieie °with, adaceirt ,, developed residential ` parcels - mit+ h leas within 2O feet, of . thoeee' pr" opert ies . The ap vlioantE3 • concep�:ual O.ite plan lluatratteB .how develop!aent of ti a site Hight occur in fig ,t' of tlae .derneit3'', transfer regi,� r netii s� Wh ae ' the housing typee allowed'' in the adjacent R -3.5 .none andt ,tha R -Z eons viropoeed for ..,may H. z e4bstarati,a1 y differenty ,the denait , xn transition reciOsements ��1ong w "�,,th d ma a e rema�t�s, ,'xeg��di�.�r landscaping and buffering can be` used t a�.n .haueiing types compatible. _ Play! Poli , 65.1 wil], be eatieiied' tt*ough revie, of a ',de�voloprae t a prop sal for the 'site through the► Sit a �e�4elc pa►ea t RC view .mod bti .1ding I pe nit xe �i+aw px;o�w�eiesea to aestxre fiat de +; e7opm me °are ;the site ii1 ., asst create - that r LL1 buil�� ngs , wi13: co p1 w .tt� the Unifoa m B ilding t ode» , �,, P3 an Policy 6.6.1 will he 'satisfied hLough on ° . screening reguiromente of . the Comiaunit ' �i f..opeient. turn development proposal for the properti.e0. ' : !' oRDYIVANcE NO. 89- Page 4 Policies adequate public service .capac: development on the proprties. Plan Policy 7.8.1 is sa•isfied becanie informed of his proposal. DistrtCt has not r the proposed addition 0110!ig ' • would cause exceeded apacities in the Diatrict's Qchoo]B District has been Meicific4 plans several pri7 achol Coflfltr2CtiOfl an] expansion proposals which funding has oecar: levy request. .an Policy .81.1.1 commits the City to piar for a safe "and, off icient street, and roadway :system that ,meets 'current': needs and anticipated‘' future development. This policy uid n be resulting froin."the proposed redebignation Of,,',theep:pitiCell::WOUld;. tend tOrn:'' reduCe the anticipated traffic onto 0"it,,,',7201,,AVenUe''' ',and other nearby strotteei is,;:! compared' tO veloppsDrit unde he current zoning. • SW 72nd AVen,US •,,ts a major collector street1,1.-1avel.OLOedW*11,,priaiagi'4y cotercia and indtaztri,i1 uses and with 4tica.t.athinoiioonl to several artertals. Alt4ough, resi.,dentisl use of the site would be anticipated to generate more nighttim and Weekend, traffi t)e140 ••• :Moat of the f' Permitted, uses ,, in' • ,‘ „ current ce.h.-P zone, thak:' traffic would be EizSbieil2, to be on SW 72nd Avenue and ;, not cn local streetS, in 'the ii,-;adja0ent:., residential neighborhood.; Thi'D .Engineering ,: ion • rev, ew future development prOpottall for the property' and may !eftfisa to improvmOflt5 ' , tO"' affected public streets to r6duce lmposti rwu)ting , fro rkl , future 9. Purofultuaunldr(Plobeldiecvryetlioi8Palel.1'rltesvaltioiewlftthtbeheaent:liniaPItitt'tPeao:frite,idd,eeevaneedlel,9;;ille;:ncl7reetneld.81'1',"ritti'Tir°=%','6p11°;Cafr.',.:6'1:3a`"xti3Ps'Slr"3:36;a1fol.7vn°;:,4"1"111,111YgPe'":,,,,:',:,,:,'.,.'•-,-,:'•,,:,,i:",i''',',''‘,i,",,,,,,,..,,,,,i,i,'"),',.: ftu. properties . T .2,44•24\; offels afore; ' the sw plaopo'lloy 8.02i;2 wiheicshatitshfeiedparecoealuseehavri3 ,, trc, tItekoo. , Ther 72nd Avenue proposed redenigtiostiort would locate an ,intoivO type of ,;,,•,tieVillO nt:, 1,,eit,hi.n close proi,jin;._,,,y to ail e3ciating 1311,.110 t...-..si% roilte. t!1:01 Provide' the opportunity tott,,t 'nigh density proximity to tenelil, major' ,.h104-waye,i eMp -ceetere; „ . , , I • thereby promoting efficient 1,so of the tra.neptirtatilblii,4*.ittilita',enCt. educ�d energy The toaatlooal, drito,twia: or, aloft tiendity-Reeidentil,'0131e are satisfied for the f�UcMLl OlINAiCE The subject prepertiieS are net ' • development, , • Density traribitit)id, iatifiertViO, and screiit4;'-'''' ' • - m' W co n,nity - .Dave to Iflent soda dray P? development on the subject proport l ®w..density single 'family residence Ug ea :c epatible w north ,a The subject ,.parcels' have direct acce,0011 to collector:etreet, and are in close proximit' ' .. both which are functionally claeeified ae t(I/ h ng� WE!s hwa Avenue, Higy 2i L�. aka; Serious. ,development limitations a ff6ct'ing thew iera en:'t'i es,F:` aucl •� Heser4ial 1 steep ®lapo�s or poor drainag e, Are not ev��ent� - facilities are present to serve futare "developaisexnt on' tl prspertiee and have sufficient, caPacity ti serge an y increae demand caused by development of the site . Public transit, is available on `SW 72nd, Avenue, ;in front ' of the site The properties are located within one garter mile of a'buslim :3e Th, p Pe � and office center across SW 72nd .Avenue from the site.. The s,Lt+a ' ie ,, also relatively' close to the undo r- developed Tigard Tria�ig1e area which is anticipated to be a, sma j�or employMent center ' in the future. The applicants point out thatt there are few multi; -fiiy housing opportunities, developed cr undeveloped, with .n aloe() proxirtity to thin future major employment ,,center,, Development of additional housing near the Trianglec) rna' reeu3 in reduced aneeoa for ,auf.-..cmobile commuting b� swoon how) and' worms: The applicants point ' to the euccesee® of the Etrutaa Way .:orridor tc . the east tae. ,an example for the Triangle area of a successful mix of new, : high quality office 1evelopuen1t, mixed density reitdentiai developfiont; and limited retail development. Ahttso■gh the bite a seals distance fro • convenience z etai1 eeirvicee at :hia' time, it i quite poeathio that conv4 n .ence. reta4 l. ueee. may , '..come available as adjacent propertieB /jnd 14tie Triangle axe developed. The a • licantoa anticipate that pri mae+ open egace ae r well an recreational facilities 110,X1 .003 prov.ded ae part of dwve�,bpment of the ells.. ., The Locational Criteria for the 4canmetel Profeenion+al .P1en 4eai nation" include a golioy of not locating. thief urge 1400 c 'pi aape�.'ty Mich 'abuts reaideritial district® `on lasers than two► e.dleal.: The �uhjegt gip y, add scent present c�oteo i gnation is ' not, in t ottal acnodn' npolnie anhall eta ia9 nd- th*Oefore t h ) e r ex Ltei "ia.; 3+ In order to approve a quaai�3i dicial faiend ent to the plan anhan .nc mats the City must a h y at here i�! e�den also �l.nd, soh � ce of a c neighborhood or co mur3Lty which affects th3 a ` i t p+a►rce . A . : rnati �y the City must find that there has heed a enieta]ena. or . conala eddy ina�le, i '�' an `Vo] ume 2 n kg tee' Original de�eigna�tion of the pareei. (00140.reheneiae 70 , ' , ' Imple�a enta� ion stra"4egy 2 = Can nunity D►evelop�ddis+�lt 1ect .e 18 :22.04O(A) l')s.DZ . ... idANCE NO Page 6 4. The , applicants aaaer!; th∎1,,t a ,change,,' clircumstand es hae' ,:: occurred in `that there • La. now :'a eig gtifica,nt demand; for hauej -ngy ogportianit .ee `within` ; ,prox-imity to employment centers..' :Thiel ecru of demand wan not se evident lust, a few ,,years. ago. , Substantial, recent : ;growth, in ' the region hae led to increased :traffic congestion end increased ,commuting tea.. Proximity 'to one'a place of employment'. to now a major faatOr in .dec..Uing where+ to call hone;. The housing industry has rOaponded' bk.' developing , ail ;,densities r" houeng.. close to employment center® The applicants" point" to, ,the ; neighboring 'trust:), Way urea a® an ,:,.example':' o) such a mixed see, .0 miser .'reeident3.a3. density' area that has developed, in' ;recent years.. ;opportunities 'within the City of Tigard within one mile o,f the . Triangle ' area for. dr veloping any type Of housing, especially mufti- family -housing, are °. extremely except for multi = family development above- the o,f irat f lour in mixed use d''velopmente withir3 the Triangle. The City Council concurs with the applicants' aeeessnient of the `increased + . demand for housing opportunitiaa near 9i p1oymeri ; .centers. This 'aseeaement i€a -. based not only upon discussions ,with potential developers but • aleo ".an diecueeions with potential residents of the City looking ,to' live "nearby them . places of employment and with current talidents, who are concerned with their ; increased compute timer. The Council also has noticed an increase in' mixed' use devehopmente and lees strict segregation of land uses in ,other cities.. Primarily becautie mixtures cif ueein 'can reault .in decri ..sed traffic and fuel consufptio% , the , Ce..)uncii supports integration, 'Of land u ®ea where po,asibie for the uses to harmoniously 'co-exist proper The ; C:i..ty Council also believes that a ; mistake in the original deeignatiron for this site in 'particular as well as mietaskes .4..n the Plan Map eed action he :1p, t, if " . It is . city- wid��d exist, tht�t the p�copo otioua can ..__� �► :rdct y , . dif f is It to assert that a Mia _e esional/Coianercial ' ar ®wan+ made in the fair- � ro e designation of this •partieJul its '' in 1983 because bf the ;extensive diacuseion,a and deliberations ' regarding this Site that occurred at that time. Nevertheless, the Council believes that the mistake which was lade ;here,* ,and, in other loc'atioflc throughout the City, was that not lerto.I.Agh attention was paid to the need for multiple family reeidetttial opportunities at iodations each as this that are near major employment Centers, near commercial c_ enters, near major highway corridors, transit Co . .., . rc al lcenterg -s, and near tic rridor®. y higher density res�,den,...�a�., o rtunil,. near employment /Comore a: pa po Ppo residential ppo lee rtuntieo, reduced" dependeno"a o*+ and. with ree � ct to t.rand rtat3 *n o automobile transportation could have been promOted and Some of ftgard's present traffic congestion could have been avoided with positive impacts, for the entire City. Instead, the current Plan` Map designate® the majority'of areas available for new multiple family residential development far from employment and doom" The primary fax Western ands designated for ,.: Hrc p 1po centers . e that 'are " d+sei tri�ieetern° lti famii' ' housin o rtunities are ,at ..thc� mu y g edges of the city. i and Planning commission late well aware of the dif € btaltie e Thee City Council g that have arisen as these `.areas have developed and as, 1,''apid city in general. A common complaint " in recent years has r, been the great n the newly dev . . u l.i�cteaee in traffic i . y elogi.ng area! and `in developed � atrese through whic h the new a.esidenta must pass in their travels ,to I -5, ighwr ' ` g ocal em�soyi ... .teas, nd hven�ie Cor" amity '� 217, and 1 � 8nt and coaoumerc�,'�11 cen� Px•ovidin ', mul.tl. f housing opportunities hearer the Triaragl.e, the ,SW 72 ri4ot, ORDINANCE N©• 8 Page 7 x The 'CLry ,'Council , revs se :. for 'den.Ab� and ''.approves Coampreheneive. Plan , Land ' Lxhib i. .0.:A7 tmap). Thkit, .ordinance` shall :be ea i s passage by ,,vounccil, at re. r430On.t e &tley, Depu X»iproved as do form i i A89-07 a o+rd /k,l +RDTLN?NCS, ISO.8S NUMBER OF PAGES: t including this coyer page) IF YOU DID NO RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASZ CALL PAX OPERATOR (5O3) 227 -0287 or SENDER AT (5 3) 229 -6060 trk 1 ou 28 ''89 15147 000 P. 02 LI,er artment of Larnci Conservation and Develc r ierst Portland Field Of ilk 320 SW STARK, RM 530, PORTLAND, OR 972044004 PHONE (503) -5088 Mail Offlow 1175 COURT STAKE' NI aAL,iM, C#IIOON 117310.061110 woos wAl014010 November 20, 1989 Jerry Offer, Assistant Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Jer:ys The Department of Land Conservation and Development has reviewed the proposed plan amendment from C -P to Medium -High Density Residential and zone change from C -P to R -25 for 5.03 acres cor,ztathed in Local File Number CPA e9 -07/2c 89 -07 (PLC') bile No 007-89). We are favorably impressed by the way these proposals ' u k high density comply with the city's idrit�aria Eoz locating hi residential development, their timeliness and their contribution to the city's comprdtzr�n93;`vr® Plan. Therefore we urge the city' Planning conmias ion and city Council to adopt thee* emandments . An important a ment of Oregon's `,and use planning laws is the reliance pun Yams and standards as the bases for making land use decisions. The city qf Tige :d has plan and code standards Which have been recognized as suitable for siting high density residai.zl' uses, It is approprlatn, as well as legal, therefore for the city approve p PP rove bamendments Vhidh comply With the standards A second centrel feature of Oregon's land use planning program is p Providing opportunity to build a` vrarietY of �' v the em has is on Pro housing 'types at, sponsive to the needs of ce ranges re O 'egoniana. As you are aiwav i, ter are many f inanvia1,, labor, tax and other ;actors' which ;d aulse f'1uctuation over time in +i Faction costa. Conditions are favorable at this time fo c rimult family housin g ean3tructinn, which Makes the proposal before You timely e,s Well am consistent with your comprehensive Plan. Finally a review of 'E.igArd'a plan indicates that op^ortutLtiee for higia density ree tdenzia1 `uses are prevalent in the y, . h fev� opportun .tiesAin the �c�uthwester�,y park of the eSt �'it more built -up einplOyment areas in this east. App. 1 these "" s ore muitif4mily housings cloys, 'Go Jobs and improved transportat ianmfacilities. � w '1 • 1 ` ` AiDoecio W CITY OF TIGAIW, OREGON fitoor..4i1 /tug COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY„ AGErA ,..,October-43-7--1989 DATE SUBMITTEto:','Octoblinel '11 1989 1.41N • /SSIE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 89--021., PREVIOUS, ACTION: Reri•47,4ed by Planning zc 88-07 IMet.•er-Ems/Hockwelli co/omission on october,S.. 1989 / I1REPARED BY: JerrirQtfm, Planner DEPT HEAD 0 Iir \CITY ADMIN REQUESTED .RY.1 Ed 14u pouar IssuE r., Should the City redeeiognate approzimately 5:02 acres from a Comprehensive Plan • designation of Commercial Professional and a zoning designation. of. C-P ' (Professional/Administrative Office Commercial) to a Plan designation of Medium , High Density Residential and a zoning designa.tion of R-25 (Multiple-Family Residential, 25 Units Per Acre)?, The applicants urge the City to, approve the .)groposa,1 in order to provide for multi-family Opportunities, within close proximity to the Triang.te area and major traffic corridors. Opponents view the proposal as providi.ng the potential for greater impacts upon the established Rollino ail Is neighborhood which abuts the site. INFORMATION SU1(MARY On October 3,- 1989, the Planning Commission reviewed the above described Plan Amendment/Zone Change proposal. The subject it is Located at '13265 SW 72nd Avenue, south of Varna Street., The site is currently developed With one single family reside:Ace. The site abuts the developed, single-family reitidential Rolling Hills sabdi,vision on t north, west, and south sides. The Planning Division eitaff report, re0onmends pproval Of the proposal based upon findings that the proposal is 'coi.isiStent with applicable:: Statewide Planning GOale, Plan policies, the Plan's, iocational',,Oiriteria for :the Medium-. High 'Density HeSidential Plan designation,,, and a, finding that,,'a ,mistake had been made in original Plan designations.' Staff ', noted that the locational criteria and policiea call 'for,Multi-,fatoilarl*InsinTopportunitiesto be ,• _ . . ,„• , • • , pre Tided near tampoyment and cOMmercial ,cetitere and, near primary traffic corridors and transit routos. Staff, noted, haWever, that multi-family i hOtia.tiag' opportunities provided by the existing P7an and zoning maps, '(etiipecially with regard to developable properties) are Oitreziely' liMited, near the Triangle, Lincoln Center/Washington Square, SW 72nd indUtiltritil cOr'zttddor,'doWlItoWn,,,,,ant • near I-5 and Highway 2174 Staff's recommendation for approval Of th‘slittop0Sal', noted that appro7a1 two be a step tiowarde rVeCtinig,' mist** with benefits for the entire Otzlittuaity by making ,a locational decision. ' 'The applicants concurred with the staff aflalysLs and added testimony regarding the , site's poor suitability for typical elirteti Well as a change of circumstances regarding changed markets ,o0lite and development. The applicants added how 4rtment development c the Site cos.t1 eenvibLve to the' the illiadent single family upighlookhopd,., • , • ';' 1.7,1b1.i0 testimony at the Planning' ,camitialtien hearing Watt,',,iniated.' , , ,..„ cited reasons why the ,pitiOerty Waft Unedited, fOr the' ropoaal Vast an tbpportuntty for .quality, development of the noted potential .00nfliote With the ',adjaCent neighborhood traffic, flOise, crime and tireplace smoke an well as potential 'decre�d property valtted and the need for the .City to assure the neiglibere,1,:eSpeOtatiOntt.' for the pert. • , „ , The ,Planning. , 'COMMiedidtt. voted 5 to 1 to 6da*O0C1:' 460141 that the peoponal would tkely raut in a '4nality.'deveiopment £o the site, -.Hit t' the 060M104$-64 046' 46t.''dOolti.ni,t'i.et1.-Hthat'' change in cicumatanceS af1ectLhg the - parcel commLaa Loners toted -c4an', difficult recommendation to make bEaUSa , , • .1 • . '1. ' • • ••• ,1 Deny ;ae, reco04e3` tided by 'the Plane c�r�, ' �*ss�- ,„.;,caq a�aa��sases�ssreas;= �iv,��ri o�eae�c�an�� ,aass�?s�ssu�am+��iira�ssfeiss XSCA ,XMPAC sss es�ci�assncs� ;a:.gs :scaem,ied¢��- SCT'O.EST°ED ACT's011, Air �roee the p of need Plan /zonin t ,amp amen �r� r�ha. -r � ,he ~©ro'ral : end. lau ►lee'ent ,then nd3.ngs eappc0 , =�J ax. Direct , the . a of to preps a £final ,order. • etctss6# flat € Vt SY. • 3313' CL • •_ • • 4' a- e • o • • a r • • G • • • MIIIIMIF • a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e • • • e • 16-1q)• e�a.. • • • •••�• ••�•••• • oe •s . 4 a • • • • a • •' .. • u - '• • • • • • a 11.1! L � a e ▪ ►,••• • - ' � . - • • % . •• .• • L • 0 4•• a••A.92.1° •: • • •• s • •••• • • Z X3. • • 4.11•4•41. • • • G• •• •{a• • �a o•k a a s . , • o -• �. . .� >s• • ', o �{ • ! • a • • • • L • 1• - •� i, av • • • • • • G�. kft. Ca[C Let it If ]f, STAFF REPORTT0 TSB PLANNING COMMISSION liE1uk3',NG DATE: , ootober 3 1969, ',7:30 P.M. NEARING- Tigard City Hall.- To!In Hall 13125 st'Lwall Blvd.. ' Tigard, OR 97223 SS SS • FAcTs 1. General I'dformation comprehensivn Plan Amendment CPA 89 -07Jone Change EC89 -07 Plan Map Amendment from Commercial Professional to t!ed,iumL-Eigh Density Residential. ilone chan9D frau c-P (Professional/Administrative Obia4Vt44,.!'H CASE: REQUEST: 1) 2, ('ffibe comir.sec;lal) to B.-25 (multiple _Family Rt,:dential 25 Units Per Acre) APPLICANT: criterioh Equities AGENT: °TAX, Inc. Cidark Rockwell) (RulPh Tahran) OWNERS: A800 One Main Place 17355 SW Sobnes Ferry Rd. 101 SW Main Street Portland, OR 97204 David Metzger P.Ol. lox 275 she 4,- OR 97140 (Tax Lo'cO 800 & 801) Lake Oswego, it 97034 Raymond tms 13400's0 76th Avenue' _ _ Tigard, OR 97223 Lot 3600) LOCATION: 13265 SW 704 Avenue. APPleo;.cimatelY 5,03 acres located 60 the Wet- Side of ,SW 72nd A:iittel'fluee,betwePri ,'SWHVitritik Street and'sw'Fir Street (see vidinitY al:optii*.Pai210 ,10) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: WCTM,2S1 iDE, Tax Lots SOO end 801 UCTM Si 2 1DC, Tax Lot 3600 (Portio) InfOrMation ceeati6ft of tax lots 800 and 801 from a single parcel was approved.. through minor Land Partition MLP 1-1. , The Plan and ';oning, designations for these parcels Were 'changed from P.1(11'Pe'Oidtii;11.4siti, 7,506 eq0er6 feet minimum lot eite) to t-attexit 09mitletOLL PkbiessionAl/CV'deeilnAtichs' during city-'wide 4:3:Lan ,H,and ,,toningi'maP revisi,ohd in 1053, 5 NO Other Peevious land use be development 01P1611L4'616':ill regardLng PtoPertie6 hays teviewed 13.Y, the City* • 1 ISTAPF BE.7.0k.,,.T -0 39- CPA 1(7,7/ZC 89 dritetLot, EqU PAGg I - S .001,,0 !. _ r , CIS A4 . ..vkEirli.ty Information �- o h west . and southwest ar a ' zonecY i3 -3 . 5 Adjiacen proPerties, to �.ho n rt o (Residentials 3.'5 unite per' acre) and ae. developed` wi , i. single family residences.. properties directly couth,''of the sib. »yam yar,s zoned C-P and age presently' _ vacant or occupied bt ' ,single family, residences. Properties 'across SW 72nd Av'et\ue from tho site are also, zoned C -P. These properties are develo1�.ed with a. number of office buildings containing 'a variety of col ercial and ,professional' uses. The sub ect €site has 367 g W SW 72nd � �,� fe ®t • of fronts, a on Su.. 72nd Avenue,.. Avenue it functionally classified as a major collector street on 1:,,ityi ® Transportation Olah ma?.. SW 72nd A4enuej is developed with 44 . g and a alk feet of pavement curbs, storm drainso e{r� eetli. htsa along the site's frontage. The site has slightly more than 60P feet oi! 'frontage along SW Fir Street. s treet consists of ' 20 feet Of gravel covered r�.gh�t -of- � F�.r S way which dead ends into the driveways of res3dences to the 'South of the site. 9'he Tr ins f.irt 3tion Plan 1.14p designates S W Fir Street as a local street. Fully developed local streets typically consist of 60 feet of Public right-of - ay improved vairth £u�l 'street �npra vemetta. n,l Site Information and Pro sal Descri tor. consists of three parcels totalling approximately. The subject property by 3600 5 03 antes,, including a 16.5 foot b 630 foot section of tart 3` o�t. between SW Fir Ztreet and the other involved parcels. The remainder included in the proposed Plan Map 1mendaent and of tax 104:,. 360�'i i® not incl Zone Change p ropoaai. northeastern corner. Thr, other Tax lot i$O0 oOntaicontains a house in its parcels are vacant. The site contains a grove of ,' trees in the The remainder of the site Jo o y northeastern corner of the. site. � ' hl °pen and 'covered !ith grassos, • weeds y and fruit trees. The Parcels are relatively flat with a light slope towards the cast. Plan Map Amendment from Coaanial The app g a ty Residential and a zone change from lioants request P.. _ h Density t � - , p r' rofe'sioxnal to ZSedum �i C--P (Professional/Administrative office C renal to R 25 (Multi le y ntia, 25' els. F'amil Reeis�e Units �:� Acre) for the subject Marc g p° ...... p not be submitted for a the eel need n q•- u +�• - .. � n5 how the Although a develo ..nt glaa� for t p p e ch e, a nonce tual site ..; Plan residential M..M• 4 proposed plan/zone might be developed with a multiple-family y: eiden l develupnt the applicants r. The a licants" intent in has been provided by PP providing the conceptual site plan waa to illustrate that a muXtiple Code'Y ompay with the Community Development adensi en transition requirements could be constructed on the site. ® Code Section 18.40.040(A) require wi.+t( i n 1+G 0 feet r d ti d at a''residential . � .. *:.. area not be cis teZope that area ,. v�nsitr �f an established +�� ,� allowed density (as specified by the greater than 125 percent of the allow Comps: g c_ .. onin eheneive Plan,., designation rather .»�aan the c+arrent z 2 kA+CI STAFF SPORT - CPA 69 -07 /ZC 39 -01 ((rtterion Equities)-- ' ' designation).. of the adjacent '•eetabliehed :residential area. For the au i jest property ee, area wxtthi4: ' .00 feet of the ol:ling' ° i l.s ul,�divie osa` to r'the north and west con d not`, .be developed at,' a dens t ►' greater than '6.25 units. 'per,''acre because the .ma sia um density allowed I by ,,the Plan's Low! Density' Residential designation applied "to-Rolling is i5 units per 'acre. Ebsa an d NPCD C;�rrrtm#� rte 4 n s reviewed the . rust and has commented . The' Fngin ®erinr� IDivi.�+iaas ha � that development of the 0it0 with a ' multip10- family rea idential • development `izi the :generate `eubatanti411y fewer . vehicle tripe 'per' worn: days on adjacent streets �� +well 'aka lesser traffic peace at typical'` IM and Pkrudh hour as comparEtd to • office development y in the existing c-P tone, a Development of , th0 t xte "Under either the • C -P or h -25 ,pones would require increasing 1�h`el fights -of- way for both. SW' 72nd Avenue aged SW Fir Street and would & ee require substantial rovent nts cstp to 3:: Fit Sure ®t. , Stcsran and sanitary Bewerg to serve the ;site are availaIie in.SW 72nd Avenue. NPO #5 has reviewed the propo al and has commented that they believe that the majority cof the neigbbore of the nOr,ject proper-t r o )pose the project. Planning Division staff; ttended a neighborhood meeting for review of the propoSa1. Some neighbor® coznznented that they,' favored the propdeeai plan/zone amendnaient because they felt it provided the opport'4113ity for a alit de Bee that: could gu Y veRegmaent 'On the a ita� as ®ppceBed to other u A number of be located on the site Under ti*�e pr i�een�' �onng. neighbors voiced opposition to :he propoual. and xaade comoae,arts related to increased neighborhood traffic pan evenings ► and weekends, the Potential "d omin6 w thin proposal might have ;on', later ',tenoning' renon g in the neighherheod, the . 10 density and` 'hi h density devei.opiaent, the need for additional ; nnulti- family housing o PPe rtun itiae, and the' effect this propoBe� action m .ght OA neighboring g p pe ies' values. coamente'; related to specific 9 review l of a 'site tahorin ro rt 3.temc the nei trbors felt eh+aul.a� be cmns3.dered in the r developaent plan for the _propotty: The Buidin g Division, the Tigard Schemaa Diitr3aCt, and N@t3GJ @t Fate]."' District have revietit ad the regu @ 6t id de n c ?�e1it8y or objections ,. regarding the Proposal. No other comments were received:. FINDINGS AND C0( MEONS The relevant criteria in this cane are statewide planning Iseal.s 10 • , z ®, 12, and i3, �i g �rd Con prQhensiv Plan po licle0 6.101j 6-a3,11 6.5.1, • 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1,; 144'.40 7.01:1; ' 7.8 , 8.1.1,, a 8.2e2 , 9.1.2, and. Chapter .2, iCoational. Criter:,a; and the she STAFF htPORT - CPA 69 -07/ZC 69 -07 . (Ci: "iter, .On i fie PAGE ige NNW mistake ' quasi - judicial chap amendment criteria of both the . Comprehensive' Plan and Community Development code. The Planning Division concludes that the proposes neist(4nt With the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines eline® aased upon ,the foklo wiMg findings: Goal #1 (Citizen Invr)lvement) is met because the City has adopted a citizen involvement P ctgram' including review of all development applications by Neighborhood Planning organizations (NPO). In addition, all public notice requirements have been satisfied for this application. ▪ Goal °2 (Land Use Planning) is met because the city has applied ` all applica Ala Statewide Planning ,Goals, City ; comprehensive Plan Policieis, and Commb nity Development code re' a rema is to the review of the proposal • Goal #9 (Eson*my of the State) is satisfied, although the pi oposal would reduce, the City's invertc �► of d evelopable commercial land, because .1) the reduction of C--P zoned land proposed is not a large amount compare11 to the total amount of developable C-P zoned land in the immediate area and the Tigard Triangle area; and. 2) allowing y Pm l -P zoned developable ®ulti iCamil develo ent near �-P aansrl properties may prOV de an attractive mix of land uses thereby helping spur commercial • rind industrial development - in the area., Other communities have shown that such a mix of land uses can successfully co -exist without adversely affecting commercial or industrial growth. The applicants have pointed to the neighboring Kruse Way area of Lake cswego where such a mixture of .land uses exists. . Goal #10 .(Housing) is satisfied because the proposal will prdvide,for additional ,sousing opportunities as prtiomotad by the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Metropolitan Eousimc (Oregon Administrative Rules, chapter 660, Division 7)* Approval of the progloaaI wou d increase housing opportunities on the city 's residential lands 'hy a total of 125 dwelling units. developable reside,.... Approval would also provide increased opportunities for . multi - family development. The .Metropolitan Housing Rule requires that the City maintain. per acre and a cat�n�m'�ann t0/50 o � rtunir developable land ,of �l*D units } 9 opportunity s � ra� a fa a m n ucn housing / 1 ty ,six for single family and multi -family housing. Goal #12 iTranspoi tation) and Goal #13, (Energy conservation) would Abe satisfied through providing the opportunity for an intensive land use near major transportation Corridors (Highway 217 and 1--5) as ' well as ne a: • employment centers. This promotes efficient use of the transportation system` thereby promoting a_nergy conservation, The Pla,znning staff has determined that the proposal is conE intent wW STAFF ttEPOPT • CPA 89- -07/Z0 89-07 (C,riter3on Hquit as PAgH 4 • applicable portions of the t omprehenstve Plan below: ba: ed .upon'' the: £indir:gs note to Plan Policy 2.1.3 is satisfied • because a � Norio a note ng sof Organization #5 and surrounding property . e r the hearing and an opportunity , to count , ou the ` presaI. o ors licants have met with the immediate neighbe5zie�i cf, the add,3.tion� � the app site to present their proposal in advance of the public hearings- . f becaause the proposal. would prcwide the Plan Policy 6. �..1 i,® sa�tis.,ied, o +rtunitY for additional multi- family development and would increase + at net. housing o rtunity on buildable lands - -min a.,�tlh/e .City. above �, This is 1.0 � . � `y.� a'SbiV- "I✓'ll®id® Planning Goal 10 w+vY6� h �1 pAo and detailed in the discussion for S .. the attached memo regarding the effect of both current Planizone amendment propo Ovals on the City's compliance with the miAtropO ars Housing Rule. . Plan policies 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 will be satisfied because the proposal would allow for dovelopu%ent of the Properties in way's that teu may be more compatible with adjacent established « low lOnsity h entl Permitted uses of the �:-`P zone woui -d be. Future than the G'tY8'r :t i►� . cc� to s� ®SAe��.t residential develcwpment� of the parcels will "'. be subj e$i�ia�l t�,.ons within 100 feet of ,tg" ' Low fiensitu Fesid transition lixaeita Plan des. mated areas to tb'a north and t vest of the site. These ` limit'- .ti:,ons would tend to lessen impa cts on j scent properties to a a ,�i� cl® to development extent than Code requirements pp eat ®r' e. proposals under the ''urrent Plan and mo » desia gnti ns. Both h the existing C1--P zoning designation and proposed designation allow a maximum building height of 45 feet- The C-.P zone requires 20 foot side yard an..i rear yand setbacks from residential zones and thus under the current zoning designation, a,45 foot .tail r:.11din could be constructed within 20 feet of the abutting developed residential parcels. Because the density transition requireslents Policy 6.3.2(a) 'Pnt Code Section 18.40.040(A) ►�tnd Cr�unity &evelopsss,. it is unlikely that ies were ronsd R 25, wouldl apply than ta�� stories tall Would g with ;: d "scent if the p� � wi. ®ea3.tr. fs$tstily residential buildings taller �_ Ins built within 100 feet, of the prc�p� - mucl. ies Within 20 feet og those iee ' boundaries developed residential parcels ro rties. The applicants I . s, Unccptuaa. site plan illustrates how development of the site might occur in light of the density transfer requirements. owed adjacent .. . R - .5 sell � While the housing type ;sube�tan { in the ad scan ro�� pro�ms�s�:tior tbce vita may code zone and the B-2.5 cegu different, the density transition i %cents along �umit .. requirements regarding lla dscaping and 1t uffibring can be used to make differing 'kiousing types compatible. be satisfied h review of of ied tiha ssu - a dovel.�ipmelnl� 4, r Plan Pali for +F e. a will be the Site DeveloPmept Review and building propoz�al for they site t permit review processes to assure that developments on the site will Piath the nat�. acre g ate nuisances and that all �+aa#,74di,a� g will co�p5:y xiniferm Building Code. ST WF REPORT CPA 89 -07/20 89 -0/ (grit .9rion Etiuities Ph! 5; Ir Plan Policy 6.6.1 will + be satisfied through : Mine: 1mpo sat ior, of buffering' and ,screening r iresments of the Coamunity Developmeft Code - to any future development proposal for the properties.' Plan Policies 7.1.2, 7-2-1 7.4.4, and 7.6.1 .ere satisfied because' adequate public service capacities* are available to verve Potential' development on the properties. Plan Policy 7.8.1 is satisfied beCausse the Tigard School District was .: informed of this proposal The School Distrivt has not cemented that the proposed addition of housipng ol:-. ore1.!ltiea within the District would, cause exceeded ca' kacities in' tire. District's achcola. The School District has been smaki.rng plans for 'increased school!. .capacity through, several preliminary school construction and expansion >aropossals' for .which funding has been approved through. the recent school funding tax levy request 6. Plan Policy 6.Z.1 commits the City to plan for a cafe and efficient street and roadwal system , ' that meete , current needs and anticipated future development. This policy would be satisfied becausne development resulting from the Pr ®posed .redesignation of these; Parcels would tend to reduce the anti llipated t 'aff is onto $W 72nd ' Avenue and other . ' nearby streets ash compared to ..ievelogaaent under the ,current zoning- sW 72nd Avenue is a major collector street developed with SrL arily commercial and inunstrial uses and with good connections to several arterials. Although residential use of the sites anticipated , to generate pore' nighttime and weekend traffic tjA west of the. pe matted uses in the 'current C -P zone, that traffic would be, r3xpected to be on Sid '72nd Avenue and not on local streets in the adjacent residential neighborhood. The Engineering Divi. =,'ion will review any future development proposal for the pr4Perty and may require iasnprovesmentsss 'to .affected. Public. streets to reduce impacts reaUlt,"1',1g from Luture daveloPments. policy as condition of approval of array. 9• future �develo8.ent of the propett �.ea ia'e.�as�sary street 3.aaprovar�enatsa would be required i P at the time of development. The pity s e engineering Division will review any future development proposals for the properties., 10. Plan Polic 8.2.2 is satisfied because TriiMet offers bus �ter�`ice on i1 y frontage. ,�.R 72nd Avenue on ein:icin. parcels an inte�aoi.ve Tlherefore# the Goosed redeei nation would the locate type o a�, ernt pr „ 9 loc 9velo witch t,nn. close proximity to an existing public train it route. 11. Plain Policy '9.1.2 the proposed' redesignation nit, for high would provide. the opportutiin� satisfied sgh density residentiaal develcipment . in p roxinmity to transit routes# major highways,' and employmenti 1 P. g • fro n ays�item centers thereby ros4�otin efficient; icxere P t�' use of the trans. ratio and reduced energy colamumption. STAFF 'REPORT == C1 . 89- y01 /zc 8 9--01 t Criterion E quitie i) 'a a 1., •••• • 4 The Lc‘aationt.)I criteria 'sPSnifiSd in * hal ter 12 o the Pan Deity ReSident*-41 use'11' Are Satisfed for he foflowi.ng • The 'subject Li.ropert‘ies 'aro' not ,committed to ". low ,densItle Denaity transit/ en buffering and Screening requirements of h the Community Devetolonterat,', code May be used to :help ,..make future deVeleitment on the subject, properties compatible with .neighborang lout .densifiy single pyzily ,residences to the north and, west. , • , c. The ...sub3ect:,-'.iiintaelii:haVe dirtict,..aaeess to S1 72nd AVentie.,: collector - street and are Ln cloae proxiaity o th.gbway and ,.'Dr5'o.htth'whi01 are fin6t141111°14621fli"16:arteriala. ateap aiopea or poor drainage, are 40E4,, public facilitLee are preaent to verve futnier40,610Pmeint'. :Oh' the :. ProPertiee,and 4tivo :buffi,043tit.•';0000.61*Y ,serite.'.014r:#6Veacte,In , dematl by...deveXopment. Of the 'Public . , avaiic2ble on z S1 72nd avenue in frOnt', Of the e. _ f. Th properties are located within one quarter mile of a businee',,ii and office cent.:.r acroee SW 72nd Avenue from the site... The site is also relatively cleats to the under,develOped Tigard Triangle . area Which is anticipated to be. a major employnt _ me center the future. The amalicants point out that them are few,multi- family housing opportunities, developed , or undeveloped, ..witlain close proximity 1,70 thLe future major employstent contact, Development additikmal Ilionfing new the Triangle May reOult it reduced needs for automobile commuiting between.:homo and work. The applicants point to the OCACCOSSee of the 31Cruse Wk? crid�k to the isaet all an example for the Triangle area of a $Auitcesl,ful. mbC of now, high •tuality office development, mixed d.mtsity _ i'casidential developmesit; and limited retail develoment. Although the mite is 001711t distance from convenience retail EteririCee at this time, it is quite possible that convenience retail uses may bedorie aValj.lablte as adjacent properties and the Triangle are developed. g. The aPPlicaste anticipate that Private cPen sPace .aa well, as ' recoteational facilitied *4111 be provIde,1 ad Part of devele0Ment In order to PProve a 44adi-judicial, amendment to he Plan and .tnn n - the Oity LVAlat also find Irthat there te eiet'etlictt3 Of a .nhanOe' th neighborhood Or cOmmunitY' WhiCh affects thel."uhiect ParceI4 Alternni!LvelY0 the city must find that there, haa been a istake or inc.toasiatenCY' :Made In " STAFF REPORT C'? 89...07/za.85107 (ctit.'ettiotquitiiata) /, , "H: , • , • a • ••••4: I ' -- 7. gym.._.. the original designation 0Sc the parcel, (Comprehene51.v0 Plan, volume 2, Policy 1.L1, Implementation strategy 2i Community '6e#010Pment C de Section 18,22;,040(A))- . !�tanc ®o has occurred in that The applica:s» assert that a change in ci:,�.. --_� there is aiow a significant' deniaz!0 for housing opportunities Within close proximity to employment centerao Tale ®ort of demand 'was not as evident ust a few yeara ago. Substantial recent growth in the lregion has led to increased traffic con sa ion ,and in6iceased commuting times. Proximity to 0o07.8 place of employment is now a major factor in deciding Where to call home. The housing industrY has reaps: jaded by AtieveloPing all densities of housing 'close to ei 2ioyment centEer®. The applicants point to the neighboring use Waiy area as an eacamt;ile of such a mixed use, mixed'' residentiai density area that has develc-ped in recent years. Opportunities within the ?Lit of Tigard, wi i.le of the, Triangle area for y hciusin es i.� Y multi- y' housing, . are develg in an type of _ thgn o.a � X11 raul.ti Tamil � P 9 Y .extremely iL mited except for smug.±:? - family development above the first floor in mixed use devel®p1mnts wLtbin the Triangle. The .planning Division staff concurs with the a >p'.icants' assessment of the . o rtuniti. - s near emploYmeaat centers. Orr anc�; +�aa�_d. demand for hoa�sing Lcl� t only on our discussions with potential developers a��e��as�eex��t • �.® based nc� but also on discussion a with potential Tesidents of the Cit lookifl9 to live , nearby their places of employment and with current )residents 'who are concerned 'with their. increased commute times. also have notic9d an We increase in mixed use developments and less strict segregation of land uses es can result, es in other cities. fuel consumption, such mixtures of us decreased traffic end fuelY onsumption, staff supports integration of Primarily in 1 � y ' land uses where it is Po co-exist esil�.�e for the Uses to harmoniouslY co-e through proper site Planning- staff also .believes that a mistake in the origf, 'al Plan designation ' fors .. ap►' 'a ty -wide exist his Site in particular as well as 3.B�a�S3 in tlta® flan that the proposed action can help to rectify. It ie difficult to assert that u mistake was made in zhe professional. /Co+aercial designation of this and p arti.�LUlar site in 1983 because of the the iv� discussions extensive li deliberations regarding this € 4.te .that occurred at that time. Nevertheless, we believe that the mistake that was mzJde here, and other locations throughout the citYi Was that not enough attention wa4 .)?aid to the need for multiple family residential opportunities at" locations ouch as, this t j rs, ,' new g . rs , and near ublic transit co e�ors. , ,g, r , �aa�. are near +�aa or emnpl�yment ceder ®, near comma al con e rrido B�* loot � major high. ay corr.�dor e p p ..: ,: te„��s, l • . .. higher ty residential near employmaentjconcnmetc an hew th111er. ect to�itrans rtation�oppo ies, r`ec»uced de dense +tin and with t�sp Fo rtustit .. ' of Tigard' tz� . oiie transportatia�n could have �' eebeQnr�va►,idec��th�p:�siti�re it��acte automobile for the entire city . Instead, the cur Plan Kia deli ate the ma. orit .. present traffic congestion +could av y . j y' s available, for new multiple le family r+esl.dlel.i�l: `dr��lo ent far fib employment and c p ..�mercial c.�..rltere�. Y The �► � areas g and 3 for • gin, ortun ties ate _ +�the�hiEar�e�r et�,rm� e� °case western edges of the city a.p The Cit Council and . g e►or�thw y for ch , .. �n�.eeio�a cultiss that have arisen ass the , s�' have are Drell. awake .of the diffi STAFF REPORT y, CPA 89'- 07 /ZC 89-07 (Criterion 101 itiee ' '- PAGE 0 Suet a ' r direction will ye ' d `f icu .t decci' lion a reg d i9 /i toting ;" ne �ghbr rhoo&i, aueh a ® 'the Rolling ;Hi']. ne .gbborhoocly BnFBi beh ave ghat the deneity transition requirements o E t e Co oo►un .t +' Deve .o ent '?code careful vita eelebtion °' and?; ` eita 'pt an aaI r� �aat�.�.i�' . ta' �►te3�8it � compatibility between housing �deve1op�4e�at�` �o differ . g' .eew�' e . find that the subject site ' i 3eai iy boated `with regard to i the Plan's locations' , criteria or multiple family ,, residential oppor ties�v'' pis' " :all with respect*, Lttyi to employment centers and hi''b y k d, . transit ac :ess We,. also. £ td ti'mt, the applicants' ;conceptual te ,te ilk illustrates how the density to i ibsa re e�x and' careSu� si" e' could Mahe high de Sity . res3: dentia . nee :; site' /�( 11u�s�� i planning �. .. �' B G:.,lP rely,.• compatible` with the adjacent let/ . density residential, develc lent' . Based upon the fi dings 'and cbnclue3.ons Wit above, the Fl in x g Div siOn ng3 at n fo a ,, �r�e�c d rec d® �h �. - �. � �.ee ��c . � . at the Planning Ci�� heiaa� ��►rward approval of CPA 89 �07®ZC ±1�O7 'for., 'the, subject edi, Density Residential end 1•-25. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TICARD, 'OREGON Pla • nning Commission Commission DATE: October 3, 1589 PROM: Jerry Offer ard Deborah Stuart Assistant Pl nne' .s The Metropolitan Housing Rule (Oregon Administrative Rule 660, Division 7) requires that the average density allowed for all developable residentiell land within the City''s 'original planning area be a misim!n of ten dwelling un3'6ts per acre. Two plan amendment proposals before you 'tonight could affect the City's overall hou .° ing opportunity index Or allowable density on lands that are classified by the Plain as buildable residential. lands. The City's Plan, as acknowledged by LCDC in /984, inventoried 1,311 • acres of developable residential land i n the City- Zoning at that t ime provided, for a housing oportuwity 213,110 units, jut meeting the MetropolitAu Rousing Rule standardl. since that ti.aae, eight Plan amendments is .lave e� �: approved �h ich . have affect the L Lventor Y. Those redesignations provide. a current inventory ®f . , 290 acres and a h g ppo y 2 unite (10.16 unite Pet acre)'. l ou��a.n o �rtunt for ].3,1�. Tie. twa proposals before the commission will ' have somewhat counter effects on p acreage housing opportunity the arnounL. c +,E developable s�s�3.dsa�t3.n1 scree a �acl the ' h ®u index. The Gross pxo sal (CPA 89- -08/Z4 89-08) would reduce the amount of developable residential land by apprc xinaately 2 acres . and the housing opportunity index by 47 uuita The Criterion Rquiti es proposal (CPA '89 -O7 /ZC 89-07) would increase the amount of dlevelopah a land by approx3 atelyl° 5 acres and the Citj's housing opportunity iuder by 125 units. The affect of these proposals, singly and jointly, on the deC%-,147.opa b1e , lands i nveztory anti the housing opportunity index is displayed below. 1. Approval of Cross proposal Developable acres - 1,288 acres Potential dwelling units - 13,065 units Housing opportunity index 10.14 2 Approval cf Criterion, 'Equities proposal Developable acres 1,295 Potential dwelling dw'ell'ing units �.lan unit -- 1323' Housing opportunity index-10.22 3u Approval of both Proposals Developable acreee - 1,293 'acres Potential Dwelling units - 13,19O dwell• a. n g tnits5 Rousing opportunity index - 10.20 units acre � 7 :.'3� PM. ' The �aeeting..caae � lled the meeting to order, at • ::President Moen ca - i312�a S6� ;�3all::8oaa�levard, held at the Tigard Civic Centex . STOW B.A Tigard, Oregon. ., ; ca Commiaaioers Castile, • �►� L: Present • President Mo , o . ta. g �,evereitt o R ©sborou h, a nd Saporta. re, Absent: Cominieeionere Barber, and Peterson. Planner 'Terri' O 1f3: ®Q 121,1)1 Staff: Assistant Plan , Offer (left Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart; Plano:LW Secretary Diane 14. Jelderka. 3. APPROVAL O l'L6HUTHSl Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Rosborough seconded to approve the *minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners Preterit. Commissioner Saporta abstained. PL 8NIaG CONMISSMoN CO, IC TI0M announced that ° Agenda Item 6 , .3, an appeal from Ng."� 3 President Moen s�non » g ' being postponed to the October 14th re ards.n, m�;ng,nctured homes, ,La Planning Commission hearing. Iw PQBLXC HEARINGS (nth. 89 -07 PD Z0NE CHANGE - EC 89-07 Plan Amendment from (Commercial Professional) to edi R g residential and a Zone Change Crom C,-P (commercial Pr feeaiona1) to R -25 Resi�7,cnz3al, 25 aan3.to /ac re) . ZONE: C -P (Commercial Professional) ( 7 e Sty °eet and SW Fa r ,�,�, d Avenue® between SW 'Yarns ) �1CTMe2S3.$1 B, tax ,lots `.30 & 801, 251 1DC, pt lot 3600 Street ( n,. r Jerry al and staff's reasons M m�c�rk�a �neisterit' Planner e'er Offer reviewed the pzcaPoa » - heights m£ the �" g and Pa Y building ,... g �.a�3.s �in and R-25 zone. tones discussed was 'why ion required between a R 3.5 the staff , ng the R-25 rather than the R -12 zone. wag r�:.•amanendin approval of th B #5 A re rueat for approval of ,a Comnrehensiv+e t�STL 4S/ - h Density w roval. g Discussion followed regarding den�a.t for rec�..aune�ndin aPP IPPLIcm1 T e S PREsENTRTI0N o Aark Rockwell; Criterion Equ Ltl.eso 1800 One Main .place, 191 S6 Portland, OR 97204, reviewed the exist ng oonditioin o£ the proPerty, and t wag Be! reviewed under the existing C`.-P bona. . uses which would .:Tae. rc�it..�l a. ;�a 'g aom ' C P to Residential � easoris for and the need fox; the proposed change fIt and Fitr R -25 versus R. =12 would be better suited for the property. PLANNING C0M.MYSSI0N MINUTES - , 1989' a PhGI ti Lai Ralph Taiwan, OTAIC Architects, 17355 SW floosies Ferry Road,: Lake ,Oswego', OR 97035, explained that th:i.,s p:"®poeaI would aninama.ze exposure to the single family residential- area and .ia'.' not designed to the !alexia= density which would be permitted. He compared design and 'Site deve /opnent rev „ew standards between the ,'C -P .anc. 84-25 zone. He stated. that the tra.fficr.from an R-25 development woeaid have tiess conflict during peak' times than C-P. traffic and that they are 141.11 a g to commit + to the design concept that they are propos ing d UHL= SEa'9J.IMO Craig iopkina, NPO; # 5 Chairperson, stattvd that the NPO was impressed faith the proposal. However,:' they are, supporting the; neighborhood in their opposition to the proposal. , They that the Comprehensive Plan ..provides for orderly develo p ent t.e area and that Chet C -P zoning should be main talred., Jack Stiger, Steiger Enterprisers, Inc , 10250 SW Greenberg Uad 1'� ;' � wd„ OR. 97223, st:Itted he has ahovn. the site several tunes and feels th:i, the site ie better suited for a high gual4y, high density residential. ,uses Gordon King, 4214: SW 51st, Place, Portland, Or, 97221, commercial Realtor for Cushman Wakcef ield stated he had paeSed on listing this site as it is inapprt:; date for commercial prof3selonal uae an 9 tter, suited to high density residential. Dale .'Rossauan, 13355 SW 76th, Tigard, oae. , 97223,: lives 200 feet f xom the west end of the project. He supports staff "s recemaileaelatiePL,fer approval. He felt it Would increase' the value of property and enhance the'' area for future development. ym 13440 SW 76th, Tigard, OR. 97223, had owned the ana jorl tye f 9 Raymond Em3, �,3�4 a ,Subd3.v i.s�.c. �tx. He f�ilt the p�pc+ the lend that is now the Rolling, Willa would clean up the ,sea, that there zs a high aiema>Endl for re sldencea in this area, and that there are probably, 500 jots available within a flare minute walking distance fza)aw the proposal. David Metzger, Ht4 4 H ox 261C, Sherwood, OR., , epr h ie o ther ewho,. ® n s the Property, stated the pro � rt Y h 1e3n li® ted for . 9yars and the have been, re . a�edl t hat this in aa r i Bate for office use. He added that b ai ffers Lor . the fra nt half Oft their remained va`.aPat. They have had ass: - sir aro rt� � which would leave the back had: f , which a tats , tine res' p pe" y � aden�i.al area, with; a structure that +would `be conatrucheo of ]teas quality than the multi family etructurea proposed James Powell, 1660 SW Fir, Tigard, OR,, lives two ttti three : �aaea s away. He was concerned that it had been decided in S3/S4 how the' Otte would develop and that now there is a change ita na'it and the de�reloper wants to change the use.' Ate was opposied to the change in Paz incip]le. Di ®cueBion followed rregafding the Conapirehensiv°e Pi on Fuinendt eat process. PLANNING COWISSION MINUTES - , 1 9 ..:� PAGE 2 9 • 'G ®o® Su,d low ° 753 J SW Varnro Tigard, O. 972 23i supported the p r po al • He would . prefer sing le family residential bsxL realizes that is 'flat practical. He stated there igas been no roi h under the ° c ►.arrent circumstance ; and 'felt the 'proposal Would inGrease property 'values.. Currently the residential area a.a an ;island anti :II if the, site 45 developed', as commerciP,l professional itt will further fragment the sic ential island. Staff submitted letters of support from teonar4 Ludwig, First Fortlar(id Leasing Corp.- John Decosta, :?rofessionals 100; Jim and Nancy Wryn; and Wallace Harding, Harding Fletcher Company. Bruce MacKay,, 7430 SW Cher` =r'y pr., Tigard, OR. 97223, abuts the south boundary of . the property.' He had = investigated the zoning at the time of putt haae and had made his decision to buy on the basis that the .abutting Property would develop as commercial profebsional and opposed changialtg tMe zone to multi ,-Zamily. Jerry Howe, 13280 SW 5th Tigard, C/11.° 97223,, lLvesal adjacent to the his home a year and a ha1,d ago because of the g lar e� lots and and low Purchased low trafff ic. He felt if the site $,. a dei eloped ` ar4 commercial Professional, the traffic would end after 5:00 the site developes as multi - family, he felt traft is would occur at all hours, that higher ' crime rate would result, and thu ; r the multi-family area would not be maintained to the neighborhood's standards. He ques ionei hQ w man y times will they have to face rezoning issOea? Ray Firicl, 7745 SW yarns, Tigard, 0R. 97223, neither favors or opposes the request. He stated that this. site had been a mabr .issue during the Compretensive PlAn process, originally it was zoned ,2-P and as a comprise' was zoned j; a special 9' Case added to and the City had made, a a�omna. 'lolling Hillsa Subdivision s I av�n ancl' h+e tied �P. y p subdivision sa felt the City should honor that cositauent a Earla Guerra, 7670 SW Cherry Drive, Tigard, 0E. 97223, was concerned what would happen to other adjacent vacant land if this site , i.ss allowed to change to thigh' density residential. She opposed the change. Joanne Bieker, 7730 SW Cherry, Tigard, OR,. 97223, requested . that the he City had .taken 1 _: ' of Pzo� �msa F � Y such as the a subdivision, } re rt remain C � LT. She did not feel i- . tta�cen Care p the north, of the artments to M ll e Ccx, 13320 SW 76th Ave. , Tigard, oR. 97223, stated Macy had , pturchased their property ti4d and a half years3 ago know .ng that they abutted C -P honing. They would not have purchased of the property had fot aseailytl She stated the sttbdi�visiona has approicimately 56en .et d tar e, *ell kept i+ots amd that the LL • _ ,. .- . _ al taoial.d nt<orel �han ,, daub the pop lotion. She Was also concerned that proper y value mould go down. FLANN'ING COMMISSION MINUTES , 1989 PACE. w•_ ,Ron baton, 13395 SW 72nd Ave;e , Tigard, , OR . °722' , re ,i .1e' ' ,!tr."-.,4 r concerned about what effect the proposed exit %entV "aillop would It'oadi.. , ' B a , other concerann were that crime ;Mould,, increaser. weelcerd noise would xncreae&d papalatndo ''would triple,' and tn�.' r�outh,.:`�,th�.ch .a happen to '.ts71e other, ' vaecant eight acres tom,. proximity to this site along Fir Street. �} Yep a'e Iron evening ,and { what ,wotiaiaa'; r6 in close S w Sharon Takahashi, 7610 SW Cherry Dr‘,„ Tigard, OR. 97223, .;stated' she has been a member of 'INFO ,# 5 since 198 ,and they ..have had to protect the neighborhood against Tech Centers Oi lside /klunzilker, and the ba,,tch' plant. 9ne did not feel that there was an error 1.n the plan aud. if thee is' a .n' ed for additional it multi- fa nii r that the Tigard Triangle Should, be evaluated for that use. d Gordon 7475 SW Cher Tigard, OR. 97223, stated he ck„-sas apartments and Daas co nceras ; the problems that high density living creates such as traffic a!t all hours. He Q,, sed the change. Dennis Worz'illic :, 7495 SW Cherry, 'Tigard. O. 97223, opposed the request. rite' felt' that lack of housing should be Put in the Tigard Triangle-1 He was concerned that adjacent vacant property would, be changed to R.25 .t proposal is appr».Aved. • .. r ort the aio,1, W.�� side w. a located ,,., � '97223. loos Jim �at�tcicson� 73St® St�� y�saa, Titer �, �,�, ear. 97223, of the project likeu Ithe look of the project, ho4ever, hat concerns and air gts t y from 8•, regarding 0 dace ardin crime, g� ®a.se fire Places. ali.� om � Greg Weber, 7425 SST yarns, xgarCl, ,0R° 97123' o, p� E ed the req uest. �Ie was concerned about air Palliation and tratfico ,, a not adjacent, `did }not Tows Sriasa 7630 S& Fiat, Tig..c�1, 'OR. 97x23, nearby, feel a substantia]. change had bean Endo to justify the change and that market c1a :. nge® corms a„-nd owners hall es upon the existing and he felt: the Cotpz ehertGiVe k`'1aiii ehouid tae relied upon.. Be noted that. the . 'trite:14A is the s for R-d25 ions► as it is fog the c-P zone,, that the , city Le in con tii4 a ss i itl thhe l n sing g oaT3 , t h a additiona5 esLdentsaL uses ate. a.Li0 e1 in tht Tlgard r�an above the first and that if, hou404 ie arget ed in the wrosl aret a that ' 8 this should u addressed e ' ig periodic r�:�ri kanil. 1 e addet , neighborhood meeting' bad, ' .rs 0 to 3 ,40:. keep the Cork ®ne ait►d that economic circumat;anceo�c ela ax �� not» a osehis . ced on thy.. asks if the Con, �e bal.an neigh'r�orh ©oo. >i�e rec,�ue.�`� ., -d denial �%ti�raver ch recd lend, approval he s' OMsted that h pp caflt be regulated to 5 it down : p strictiv%a cO \renantS,. '�1 ..'n tike... neighboa:��►or.�€l a�litc'l cote ga with sc��i� ace REBUTTAL o mark Rockwell stated that the applicants awe' will . + neighbors .o .car utit , to . . ictiv'e cov►enante i�:.. felt. that the renaont nei v m t ,happy restrictive e with the C t zoning gwhic because utld ;be` permitted* severe y va.e4aa► 'site . several' reta+� ex�oeed to the u of which could not Y fort tall +�onc i�: end at 5=00 It1. In addition* the.. could have I � . x: kYA PAGE PLANNING coMHI$S /DU I HIN�J1�Es a 1985' ./ .• uildng 1j0 'feet from :.their gro to ask property owner to ;.; rt 'line; ent.• fell ' k9 veass .` was,, , a to 80 4' that`' traffic , would ".'. 50% less than a commercial,' `. develop p and 4 ,woulr nat , penetra neighborhood •. " He felt' that the concerns and that even, homes . in, : trhe: Roll# ng'. Hi ..1E'. irun down;.," that' the 550,800 .units they ' ,, would enhance the area and'''increane :ho e ' enaity showed above the first floor in as it has not even'' been alit increased :e�,�xne are un Su ii. is on :have :been' gall; ropo�ed would not denigrate" , b� alv% a , He did ‘,Tot., feel the R- the Triangle was waii a serious One bund� le to work downtowm "Portland PUBLIC. 'o1RIfii*G � LOS8[3" ed t.�r est or Ott 'favored user "� evert ►' Coc�m i®sf n this, was a h"a h a�lz;t proposal• that y commissioner .. veboro�ik h felt � ? � , However, he was unsure whether the criteria had been met.. He ,Aid not feel, a mistake had been anadl�;e. o Commissioner Catltile was impressed with the c esign, however, he ° felt the. C-P one should hei preserved. Commissioner Fyre felt that this ie a good development; ',however;' there are no'guarantees, that this $.s the project that would be coLstructed. He did nP the feel that the criteria had be met for a change. He felt that erha e entire area should: be looked at change €or a chang to multi- femily.l e en ccmmieeioner Saporta ,did not feel the criteria had been met. President Moen was concerned criteria had nc,t been :met :ant cern,ed that the to wart ant change- He had a problems with abutting R-25 and R -3.5 zones. He felt that density transition and buffering help, howe...ier Rolling ',Hills is unique And the City did make a commitment to protect the subdivision. : Commissioner 'Eyre' moved and commissioner csstile seconded to forward. CPA 89 -07 and ZC 89 -07 to City' Council with a tr.icommendation , for denial based on the f,,nd,A, g, that:, ' the proposal did not meet the criteria to allow a change in the Comprehensive Plan. ... ..., _...... far;,... :.. _: -._ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 1P o�r8 s Cost► rehensCHANGP].a amendment d$`ont 5.2 NPO #7 A request for ap,; v p g y : f � ighborhood Co mnero3.al ' and a ' Zone l�iediuc -Hi h Denes:t Re -. -.dent 3.a1 to Ne ` char g a from R--25 Res -d,ent* tl, 25 c--N :Aighbotn ooc� „' ZONE: R -;25 ( Residential , 25 nnit®/acre ) COG* u erc .al LQO'ATIt�1: Southwest corner of the intersection of STS Scbolls Ferry Road and SH, 135th Avenue, (WIC , t IS1, 33CA Tax lot' 100) Assistant ` Planner Deborah proposal, the orate Stuart reviewed improvements, and''mada staff's recommendation L` for denial. PLANNING cONHISSiON HI RTES 1989 '= 'PAGE;, ropoae: t0aE r 1 • - 1f ILI MIONIUMMIHMEMMEMMIPV 0 PROFESS ONALS 100,;: REALTOR: r. Jerry Offer Community Development Department City of Tigard' Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for 13265 S.W. 72nd. Avenu 'a; 201 IDS, tax lots S00 ",& sc01, a portion of 2S1 1DC, tax l of 3600). Dear Mr. Ofer' Bated on my experience in mar,": .1 Pang the .property', there are several reasons why I recommend approval of the proposed Com : rehens i "e Plan Ammendinentry First, T.h #4 site is not large enough to accommodate. C -P projects of substantial scope and quality. Second, the site is disprop:rtionately deep i n relationship to its width and frontage on S. Z. 72nd. This eliminates most C -P developments as greater width and visibility are nearly always important requirements. These limitations result in two small psi tes . One on they front that is 2 -2.5 aces, and the balance of the property► in the back making up a second "landlocked" site of 'a similar size. If the current zoning' is maintained, I fully expect the property will be divided into two parcels, as tae have had interest from various individuals ;to ,purchase the front portion to build a small office' ©r coMMercial building. That leaves the "landlocked' back half of the property undeveloped and "with relatively little value.' riven .these circumstances, I would not anticipate that the development property will be of hi on the high quality, particularly on the back half, i owever, if the Comprehensive Plan amendment ,and, zone change' , are made, the opPt'%ite is true. The size, shape, and lo. ^ation or the property are excellent for accommodating a y � f.;amily development Furt'hermore the high quality multi change would help tO ad oust a 'significant imbalance In available land: At preaent there is a large supply „of undeveloped c -P l avi d Yet there is -2 land .avail able no -R �� la or near the Ti ��ard Triangle. " SinCerel y, ohn Decosta Lake C sivego Branch ruse s new, 5285 SW. Meadows Rcki Suite 161. sr+ go..Cl l' 97035' (5033 636-4545 .... , Minutes September 19, 25, 1989; 5 2 Receive and, F" 5.1 7 Approve File: Oduncl (A].endalc 5.3 Approm Final Order - amprehensiAre Plan Arrandrient CPA 89.-08 Chaise 89-08 Gross; I8O #7 , - Wsolut.ion N'a. 8941& ' �4I ' 'ArtoDi 4t •�� ire r I ft • �� d ,L.. at . I <;fc� .� a �° \inendment from , Ctimbery al P!ofessicnal to , 1 Ljb. Pro esslcna1 to F -25 Residential' aTI�, a C� c del � C-P (Residential, 25 units /acCe� for y 5" ate`. Le'TtSN: side of StoT A, bali SW Varhs Str .IFZr t 2S1 1DB, Tax I ots, 800 '& 801, 2S1, ;�, Tit Lot 3500 PubliC Heari to November 20, 1989: { +4 OW, 44.4;r4,4. 0.1.imossor • 4, 4,4 14, ei i.1 t■ .44 no:44, 444.44.49714.6 ' ' 4444,444414 ...40.4416:nanaim... low .no.4:4,44,44.i 4,4•■■•••no :444iio■a4 {4444444'.■■,4■"■44,6•4'4,..44 : , 4 1 ' • . ■ ii:11 it,ir'i io, , 4 .4 ...." • A. „4 4 % 1,44% ":i4.4"T''.:a..;,. %,, 1..1 4 • • ••■ I* i • , i . ,Y. Ai' , VI. ,' • .iii.,. , I .44 ....... ' ., . ytm --":11777-111,1" , . .41 immwei 1.1* 111.1/ IU,o ,11./Ni 1 .1, Yilm 1.14414111‘ moo. ■■4 • tor i fti,i1.14. a■•:thi 44,4, 4 a ,44,, i+.1941.064 s68s ge9 EOS JI 51010 9i':ST 6B 4 AOW CITY dF TIGARD, ORE'GON'! COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA . OF: October 23 1989 . DATE 'SUBMITTED: , October 11, 1989 ISSUE /AGENDA TITLE: CPA 89.07 P � . - ' ". Rockwell Ccmn aelion on October 3 1989 ' et , er• -1�ms ann Zt:88 -07 M . PREVIOUS AGTIOI+1 Rev�.ewed b Fl PREPARED BY: Jerry Offer. Planner o 7 CITY AD�iIN OK %�I /I R'!QUESTi D `BY: Ed Murphw, cU .Dia�ector 44( DEPT HEAD 1 1� !� , -- =a =aaa �- - - �.�s =..� __====================== I ' POLICY ISSUE Should the City redesignate approximately 5.02 acres from a Comprehensive Flan designation of Commercial Professional and a ;zoning designation of (Professional /Administrative Office Commercial) to a Flan designation of Medlium High a zoning designation 1F R -25 (3Mu1 �iple- FaMi1y h Densit Residential and Residential, 25 Units Per Acre) ? The applicants urge ' T:be City to z aprove the proposal 'in order to provide Y PPo n close OPPo � roximit to the Triangle area «��d major traffic corridors a � neat h view the 1 y 9 for molt Tamil o rtunities w proposal as providing the potential for greater impacts upon the ebteolished` !tolling Hills neighborhood which abuts the 'site. = -===. == == == == ==s= = = === s =mx ===== ==== = = = = == === me =arras = == ========== INFORMATION SUMMARY On October S v 1989, the Planning commission reviewed W described Plan Amendment /Zone Change,. proposal. The subject site is located a t 1 3265 12nd n Avenu e , south of Varna Street. The site is currently dev elo ped with one single family residence. The site abuts the developed, single -- family residential Rolling Bills subdivision on the north, west, and south sides. The Planning Division staff report recommends' approval of the proposal based; upon findings, that the proposal is consistent' with applicable Statewide Planning Goaa.a, Plan policies, the Plane locational criteria for the medium High Density Residential Plan designation, and a finding that a mistake had been made in original Plan designations. staff' noted that the Plan's ocational criteria and policies cs 9 + + f ar multi family housin g opporr tuni tieu to be provi. ded near employment and commercial centers annear traffic corridors and transit routes- Stafg no ted, hor , �er, that -f hoUeing o PF orttinities Provided by the existing P' . an a nd zoning saps', (esPeciallY with l'oserd to developable properties) r t� Y i, the Triangle, Lincoln Center /Wash nc on Square, SW 72nd Lnda s iacor ridor downtown, and near 1-5 and Hi gh we y 2�7. Staff's c ®eomme ndation for app roval of this proposal noted that approval would be a et+ap toward correcting thin mietak) With reeultant benefits for the entire community by making a 'traffic sensitive n. The applicants concurred with staff analysis and, loca�tional c�ecieio the added testimony regarding tho site's poor suitability for typical C -P uses an well ail a change of circumstN ncee regarding changed markets for office' and develo ent. The a icantsg added testimony regarding how multi •- family �, Li . - apartment devels entt on the site could be sensitive to the .needs of the adjacent single family neighborhood. y Planning Commission hearing wad mixed. Proponents Public testimony at the Pla cited 'reasons why the ro rty Vine unsuited for typical C -P uses and that the Y P Pe Y proposal was an crportunity for quality development of the site. pponenta noted potential conflicts with the adjacent neighborhood including increased try^ fir, noise, crime and fireplace > etaoke as well as potential decreased property values and the need for the City to assure the neighbOre' expectati' ns for the property. The Planning ommi' Sion voted 5 to 1 to recoff end dyers al. Codimi®siditere noted Y a. alit y cdev�el . g _. . P.... ._ e that a Chan 'e in circus � sakes arfec that. the�unissi n �a id ]�ikel result in. , ° �� r . ecaiinninP an hdi e#....nationia `had ' been demonst*atei the arca►1 or a vista but the e e net' t as a +diffi ul P � � e: t recomme' Cc►m�mi,seioners noted that tfiie' ,,,; ndat�.an to ma�cek becaue ' , /. , • s- ' • • •.. • • • ••.• • • • • • • • • ••► • • • • • • • O. • • 4 -• c4 •= • • • • • '• • • • • • a • • b • • • • i• • .• • 0- • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • - • • -•' • • • • 9 • e • • • • • • • • • • •_ a,• • c • '.• •• , • M • • • , � • • • ' • a •4 • • • • • • • • • • • • a e •, Oita- we o • • c •- - - • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • _ • o • S. •4 •-• • • • s • • • .0..0. • • • • • • OPP • a • a • a • `IllC NV‘ SIISYS:3151! - •• II. 141110,10. •• &•••t •n• .i. STAFF REP0*2 TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: October 3, 1989 7:30 P.M. HEARING LOCATION: Tigard City Hall Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 . FACTS 1. General "nforrmation CASE: Comprehend:, v Q Plan Amendment CPA 89 -07, AGENDA ITEM tone Change ZC 89 -07 PI QUEST: 1) Plan, Map Amendment from Commercial Professional to Mediuz -High lIensity Residential. Zone ) Change from '.p (Professional /Administrative 2 Office Commercial) to R-25 (Multiple- Family Residential,' 25 Unite Per Acre) APPLICANT: Criterion Equities (Mark Rockwell) 1800 One Main Place 101 SW Street Portland, OR 97204 OWNERS: David Metzger P.O. Box 275 Sherwood, OR 97140 (Tax Lots 800 a 801) AGENT: OTAK, (Ralph. Tehran) 17355 SW Boones Ferry Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Raymond ,En!3 13400 SW 76th Avenue. Tigard, OR 97223 (Tax Lot 3600) Rd. , LOCATION: 13265 SW act es . 72x14 Avenue. �pprorimatoly 5.03 ac�,e® lccated on the west since of SW 72nd Avenue, betweenQ Ow Verne ` Street and SW Fir Street (see vicinity y p, g ). 2S1 1D 3, Tax L to 800 and COI PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: W 231 iDC, Tax Lc: 3600 (portion) WMbi Background .Information Creation of tax lots 800 and 801 fro0 a single parcel lan was a ro zoning d through signations� for these parcels wee chari�ged from 1 -7 (Re . , al, ,,, lot size) to their current CoGoaomercir l minimum ) . . 7, 500 square feet m Pr ofebeion3l /C P designations during n N city-wide Plan zoning, ma revisions in 1� 83. No other previous land use- or development applications 'regarding these properties dies have been rev %aw ed by the Cifcy. STAFF REPORT - CPA ' 89 -07 /2C 89 -07 (Criterion Equities) PAGE 1 Try . Vicinity information Adjacent properties to the north, west, and southwest are zoned R-3.5 (Residential, 3•5 salts per acre) and are developed with single f.y' residences. Properties directly south of the site are zoned C-P and are presently vacant or occupied by single family residences. Properties across SW 72nd Avenue from th... site are also zoned C-P. These pr+rties are developed with a number of office buildings g ' Professional 'uses. contain�.n varx�et of. commercial and profaesi 0 ` 72nd 7 The sub ect site has 367 feet. of frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. SW , Avenue is functionally classified as a major collector street on the City's Transportation Plan dap. SW 72nd Avenue is developed wlth`44 p streetlights. end a sidewalk feet g along the site's frontage. storm drains, The site has slightly more than 600 feet of frontage along .SW Fir Street. SW Fir Street consists of 20 feet of gravel covered right -of - y Into the drivowa residences to the south of wa which dead ends ;��` ys of reside the site. The Transportation Plan Map designates SW Fir street as a local street. Fully developed local' streets typicallw consist of 50 feet of public right - of-way improved with full street improvements. . Site Information and Proposal De&ecription The subject property consists of three parcels totallicg approximately 5.03 ac y section of tax let 3600 between SW Fi.,r street and the other sears, 1„��ocltiding a x.6.5 foot b• 630 foot o �,• er involved Parcels. The remainder of tax lot 3600 is not included in the proposed` Plan Map AzitIndment and Zone Change proposal.. Tax lot 80P contains a house in its northeastern corner. The other parcels aro;E vacant. The site contains a grove of trees in the northeaster tin corner & f the . trite. The remain er, of the site is mostly • g to towards the east. Pe r001,0 • relati►� yed with �; ass,H weed pe 1„s' o n and-co s, and fruit trees The ce el' flat With a slight'. s p Corm erg^' ial �� ®eident�ial �dt r The a licante re e PP c,�u sg�g a Ply onmQ .change fres�, P,_ofeseional to Medium Hi h Deneit 4t a zo C =P' Professional /Administrative Of, ( vial 25 �Tnts Parillcr�flriathQto uRb2 Miele- Family Reeiden , ) j P le. Although a deve . pm� p to ont ' Lard for the arcel ' heed not 4�e submitted :Iforj a propceed plasm /zone - change, 4 conceptual.Oite plan illustrating how the g pe p i].y residential `development site m ht be developed d with a multi le -fam hasp: been. provided by the applicants. 'the appl .�.an a inter , ? in p ng the conceptual site plate was to etrate that a multiple- faailyidb,,slo ent which llu �► P Y l► � h would coax �, with the Community Development Code's deneity' transition rec uiremente ^sold be consetas;ucted can the site. O';ode Section 18.40•0401A) requires that a essiwith aI100 feet of an .establ ie'fled P 1 ity rester than 125 rcent ofnthe allowed density a spec:if ed by t e ,g PB y' ( C prehensive Plan designation rathesr than the current zoning STAFF REPORT - CPA 89- 07/`ZC 89 -07 stCricerion $gn3.ties�) FADS 2 _ .s0 .w 1-• J. designation) , of the 'adjacent eetabliuhed reeidentids1 area. For''the ®ub ject r properties, area within 1001 feet of the Roliingr Hills Subdivie�.on to the north and west could `not be d €*veloped,`. at a ' dczel . ► greater than 6.25 unite per acre "because the u a:x*um dent ity. ariowecr by the 'Plan'a•:Low Density Eeaidential designation applied to Rtlling Hills is 5 unite per acre. . gercy andc,NPO Comments'' The Engineer.! net Division has reviewed the' request and has commented that development of the site with a multiple- family residential development en't in the R -25 zone, would . generate substantially fewer vehicle tripe ,'per work day on adjacent streets as well as ,lesser traffic, peaks at t +pical AM and PM rush hours as compared to °office, development in the existing C -P cone • I Dovelop rent of the site "under either the . c -P or R -25 zones would reguire increasing thA rights -of- way for both SW 72nd, Avenue and W Fir Street and would also require aub;64ant al improvements to SW Fib Street. Storm and sanitary sewers to serve the site are available in SW! 72nd Avenue NPO #5 has reviewed the proposal and has commented that they believe j X the .neigh agra of tie subject property' oppc.ae the that the ma' o�rit of th„ Project. Planning Division (staff . attended a neighbarhoCd Meeting for review of the proposal. Some neighbors coo 'rented that they favored thm proposed plan /zone amendment ),cause the folt it Y Pa► `` ®site an o sad to the oppor't�rnit� for nth y provided n other h:�e o a alit clev ®lo t��n� o that eo�al , P zoning. ®s At tnumbez ,of neighbors voiced be glocated o the e��,te under the resent • PPO � made comtnente r�lat!e�d hooch a. and mad o e,�tion I to the a to increased neigh ood traffic icon evenings and weekend . , �� :the • popotential "domino effect n � ichis proposal might have on later res6nfng 3Ln the nieighborhood, the coeuatibility, between 'low density .and i:,tgh der►tsity development, the ne. d IfOr additIonal multi - family housi l5 opportunities and the effect this propos4th' action might have 'on • neig iboriug properties' vai ass. other c enta related to epacif .c items the neighbors felt should be considered in the review tit,* site development plan for the property. The Building Division, the Tigard School aDietrict, and,Iletz er Water viewed the request g aietr3.et have re qu and made no c.oaaments, wr ob jectionb regarding the proposal. No other conunente wore received. FINDXNOS AND CONCLUSIONS The rel v e alnt criteria this ca ®O hire Stateaiide ffilatinihg Goal give; Plan policies 2 4,14,1, .1, tea r g p 10, 12, and 13 � �i and Cara rah ®n 1 .6:3.3, 6.5.1,: 6.5:1, •1:1.2, 7 .2.1, ly 8.2-2, 9 01-2, and Chapter 12 Locat .on it 1 C:ritteria; and the change 'or STAP ' :REPOT - CPA 89 -07/f i�: 89-. on quits 6 j 4 a - mistake clgani- judicial snap amendment criteria of both the Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code. TY , Planning D'ivJLaion; concludaa that ,the proposal. , ie consistent with the jplicable Statewide Planning5' Goals land, ui {felines based, upon the 'following findings: is Goal #1 (Citizen Involvement) is met because the City has adopted a citizen involvement Program including revilw of all development pp by Neighborhood Planning Orgatisationa (NPO) . ,In applications ddf-t ;ono all public notice requit' 4,mento have been satisfied for this application. 2. Goal #2 (Land Else Planning) ie met' because the City has applied all applicable Statewide Planning Gua1s4 City Comphensive Plan Policies, .nd Community Development Code require nerita' to the review of the pr©posai. . Goal #9 (Economy of the State) is although the proposal would reduce the City's inventory of developablso coalmerc .al .land, because, .1) the reduction of C -P zoned land proposed is not a large amount compared to the total amount of deVelopable C-P zoned land in the immediate area and the Tigard Triangle area= and 2) allaying'', iuulti�ti family development near Cr,-11 and I -P, zoned: developable PM0Pertiea may provide an attractive Mix of land usorr the eby helping Spur commercial 'and' industrial development in the ai:ear,. Other communities have shown hat such a Mix of land Uses can successfully y affect co -exist without adversel affecting commercial industrial growth. The applicants have pointed to the neighboring cruse Way area of Lake Oswego where such r, mixture of land ueea exists. Goal #10 (Eonsing) is satisfied bet%anae the proposal will provide for additional housing opportunities as promoted by the city's Comprehensive Plan and the Metropolitan •Housing Rule (Oregon Administrative Rules, apt er 660, Divi�si on 7) . ' Approval of tbs. proposal would increc e• housing opportunities on the City's developable residential lends by a total' of ' 12,E dwelling Units. Zppri' val would alp() pitovide inrireased opportunities for multi, -family development. The ,Metropolitan itan Housing Rule requires that the city maintain, a minimum h! ueirvj opPortunity rate for develoPabZ4 land of 10 unitsper acre and a Minimum 50,50 opportunity mix' for' .riling,,® Easily and multi- fancily ;housing. satisfied(thirough providing the opportunity for an intensive land use 5 Goal #12 Tsians rt�►tion and, Goal #l� E near mays po . (Highway : opportunity - ) ,� t�an ®� rtartion corridore 217 and Z 5 � a+e t,/eli as near °eimpoyrnent centers: This promotes efficient tt®e " of the trans portation sy stem t hereb y pronoking ev. er gy eortservation: The Planning staff has determined that the proposal is conei®tant''With g: AFF REPORT CPA 89 -07 /Z0 89 -07 (criterion Equitie5j 10 '4 F-, applxcabi0 portions of the Coa■preh�enaive Plan ba ®ed u�� he findings noted below: • n 1� 1. flan Po�.i�y; 2.1.1 �._ s€�tisf led because 1�eighhorhood ' Planning, ©rganizatiort p5 aind aurrtiunding property owners were given lotice of the .hearing and an opporLun ty to comment an the propo lsl.. In ddition, the applio the ` a ante have octet with itmmed3;a�te ' neighbe�i;,s3 of rho aite,to • present their proposal in advance of the public Z • Plan Policy 6.1T 1 ie satisfied because the prt poeal, would prcrride the oppo: tunny 3,°or additional multi... amily development and would increaee the net• ''housing opportunity on buildable lands in the City. Th ®i.e dietait.ed in the diecuardintheg of amide oPlani�3h rurrent aezo d ttached memo re the :s g �' - ` bo P a0endment propo ale on the C "ity °e compliance with the lrletropolii:an Mousing Rule, • Plan S 5.3.2 and 6 �3. w!1 1 be eerie €ea b the • 'prapoeal *culd aZh. for development of the properties in lye that may be more compatible with adjacent established l denei ;% resident al, areas t han the currently permit. ed uses o the C-P seine would be. blurs _.. ttrr. aa' nnks s do d eveopae nt of the P zed will be Rdte eo v se idd1oeepr n mteeiit i fiitat ions within 1 00 feet of the ,low penal ty flan de3i gr't �d area7iQ to the north wept eit�These 11.mitatione tend zo lesson impaote on adjacent properties'to a greter extent than code e quireraente a pplicable to l p r p .- . e cinder curren and sae deexgnat,ione. Bath the existing C -P toning deaignation • asndd the l� po � ' earl the »25 so g C- P''aone deeigna�con a�l]lo�r a waximum L�uildir� g o T yard and re feet. hei ht 'of 45 r®sidential requires 20 foot aide ar yard oett,►r..�ce 'f zones and thus minder the current zoning deeigr,•ation, as ''45 foot tail building could be constructed within 20 feet Of the abutting developed residential parcels. Because the density tyansltion requiremente.of Policy 63.2(a) and cotunity Development ,Code Section 18,.40.040 (A) would: apply if the proPertiea were '$0004 .0;0#. it ie wnli rely that �oulti =-frm ly xeeidentia ). buildings taller- than two stories tall v.ould be built within 100 feet, of the'propertiee' boundaries with adjacent developed residential parcele - much leans within 20 feet of t ; tho3e eruprtieet The applicants' conceptual te Plan illustrates how d evelopment of tree site mi g ht occur in light of t ie det.eity ransi�er requirement& .' 10i116,--the housing types allowed 1.n the adjacent toed Oed. p po f sh.r ite ay 1_� eubetaet.,*4 t different the a o density transi, ion m�irg me :s1oz q with ► requirement i regarding 1andecapirrg and bufferi i can be uee�sl to aim s the differing housing types comp��ttib1e. 4 Plan Policy 6.5.1 will be sari a led through ::acs= i.liw :'of a develop tnt propaeal for the site through tip ;e B3 to bev a -00.0 `nt Review and 'btilding permit review proceenee to aeiiurEt that develoteLnente on the site ,will n$.�Ecreateiluisance ► and that all buildingei w3.1 . oompl ding Code. Y :with the STAFF REPORT CPA 89 -07/ZC 89--07 (Criter! on Equities) - PAGE 1 Plan Policy 6.6.1 will be satisfied ` through the,. iniposttior af' ,buffering and screening requirements' of the Community `'Development Code to any future development proposal for the proerttes. Plan Polic t*12 7.1.2 7.2.1e 7.4.4. and 7. S.1 are satisfied because adequate public wervice capacities are available to servos potential deve1ont on the properties. '7. Pltn Policy 7.8.1 is satisfied because the Tigard School Diatrict was informed of this proposal. The School District has not commented that the proposed ' addition of housing opportunities within the District' would cause exceeded capacities in the District's echoolb' The School district has been masking 'plans for increased school capac:i::j through several Preliminary ocnool, construction and expansion proposals for .which funding has been approved through the recent school funding tax levy request' 8. 'Plan Policy 8.1.1 commits the City to plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway +system that meets current needs and antici acted future development. Thie po11cy c°uld be xatisfied botcause development resulting from the rroposod ,redesignation t of these parcels ^ `% 72nd Avenue and r�ould' tend to reduce the ant�.ai;oat ®�d t.�affic onto - 8.� ' 72 other • ' near streets as I compared to develop nvnt under the current SW 72g .td Avenue iu a ma jom collector r ,�� ®Wing... � ' street developed,witn primarily commercial and industrial uses and '4th good convoctions to several arterials. Although residential use of the site would be anticipated. to gene-rAtie more nighttime and wrieicend traffic than 'most pe ., h ent C-P ��on$i o tl'at traffic would be c+�: the. permitted uses its tt�..� •curx expected to be on SW 72nd Avenue and not on treats in the adjacent residential neighborhoc i. aginiering streets will review an y future development roposal for the property and may require improvements 'to ,affected Public. street to rice impacts .resulting> from future developments Plan Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied as a con'sition of approval of any future development of the properties. Necieasary suet improvements w t iJ d be required ired at the o . eve o ht . tbe Cit ' u Ingineoring Division will review any future development Propc e $e for „ the properties 10 P y re bus service �3an P:,ic 8.2.2 is satisfied betcuus�» Tri -met ogff � cep on ,eW 72nd Avenue on which the arce1E have frontage, Therefore, . the proposed redesignation would locate anDintensiveit o development f within-close pr�lximity to an existing ' pu, l ca a +deQ►elo Plan - Policy 9.1.2 is aatisf .ed becauta the proposed redesignation would provide the opportunity for high density residential dove1oament in pro*i r,ity to transit routes. major hig?twayrs, and' employment centers thereby ;promoting efficient use of the tin nspc'. 4.ition ' sy citem and reduc:d energy consumption. STAFF 'REPORT CPA 89 -07 /v0 89 -b criterion tquitiee) - PAOL r. Wel ▪ lie E�ocational Criteria iL$ cpecifiet! in Chapter 12 of the Plan for Media -High Density P.eidential use: :`, ark aatiefied , fo17 the, foliowinrg reaeoniii': . The subject properties are not ccxntitted . to low den city development Deneity tranel.tion, buffering, and screening reguirewenta of tl the Community Development code may be used' to help make future development on the . subject _proPertiea comp ttible with neighboring ;low density single fanny reeidenees 1:0 the north and west. • The subject parcels have direct `access tb SW 72nd Avenue,, a'.mYjor collector street, and are in close proximity to Highway "427 ' and 1 -5, both which are unotionally classified Am arterials: ▪ Serious development ?limitations affecting the propertieu, such ea steep alopee or Poor' drit nags, are not evident. Eseertial public facilities are present to se.' "e future development a the Properties, and have sufficient ,capacity to serve any , increase in dew id caused by development of the ;Rite. . Public transit is available on SW 72nd Avenue in front of the sits. ?. e properties are located within one quarter mile of a business all(1. office center across, 8W 72nd Avenue,e from the site. The site is also relatively cbo■e to the ,under - developed Tigard Triangle area which is anticipated to be a major employment center in the future. tb,} there are Few multi- family applicants Point out y g a,t k�`� r developed ' or undevelopel, within p r tibiele close horoximit k o to thl a future may jor employment center. Development of additional housing neer the Triangle may result in reduced needs for autamobi,le g t '; and work. canaautin ` ice. cceetn � ;,ome The applicants point to the successes of the Kruse may corridor to the eaOmt; ae an example for the Triangle a lea of a,\ euccesefu 4. mix cf.' new, high quality office . devAlopnietit; c�ntxed dea�efS:y ref identia1! developpment; and limited retail deve opms Although the ^mite is some distance from. convenience retail, services at this time, it is quite possible th6t convenience retail uses may become a' ailabbe as adjacent proper. ieo and , the Triangle are developed. The , applicants �inticipate that private open apace as w'el'1 an recreational fa cili , ee will bo provided tai part of development' of the site. in order to approve a quasi - judicial:, amendment .to the Plan and zoning ,map., the City Inlet also find that there , ;in evidence, of a change in the neighborhood c,r community which affects the subject parcels Alternatively the City muf:it find that there has been a mistake or inconeietency made.' in STAID` ' 'REpcR PA 89-07/ZC 89 -07 Critorttm Equities) PAGE 7 q the original des3gnation of ,parcel �Compreheneive Plan, �olu 2,Policy 1.1.1, Implementation strategy 2; Community Development .Code Section 18.22.Q+40(A)) • The app�.ic: r.te a30ert that 'a, change in ci.rcumetances has .occurred in :hat there is now a significant demand i;or honeing opportunities within close proximity to employment centers. This 'sort of demand was not as evident jurw a few yam. se ago,. Substantial recnt' growth i:1 the region hae led to increases traffic congestion and increased , OMOutir,q times. Prox3.mi t3' to one'se place of employment ie now a major factor in deciding wL�are to c�cll home. Thai; .housing industry hae responded by� developing all dens ties �of' housing ' close ` to employment i;tentere. TD�e ap �licants point to the neighboring Rruse way area ae an exaiiaple of such a mixed u ®e, mixed 'residential density .urea that Yias developed in recent years. Appo►rtvaitiee� within the City of 'igard within one miles of the Triangle area for developing any tv of hou4ing, eepacially multi- fasaily housing,. are ,extremely limited except for Bevel B ��,zlti -�fam y opsent ove' the first floor in mixad s ee developments wit br,in the Tr i111410.. The P] anni,ng Division staff concurs with the pp e' assessment of the increased dOMand i or housine o stun ;ties near liemprloyment ,centerZ. out assessment . ie ba •4z i t 4+nly O% our di,acu ®signs w£'ch potential developers but also on discussions w ith potential vesidenta of the City' looking to i live • nearby their places of employment and with c.�Trent residents rho are; concerned with their, increased, compute timesa We also have noticed an pros ' segregation of land useseineother c t es.�ePrimarily becauseawach ®mixtures of uses can result in decreased traffic and fuel conaumpti�in, staff supports integr a t • a �.fon of land uses. where it is possible for the. uses to harmoniously ca- exist through proper site planning. Staff also belie''. ` � � cit wide ex5.at . th s site in p articular ass well as mistakes in the Plan Ma dece "bst p P 5t' es that a ma btake i tt the original i+lan ee a t04 ., the proposed act ion can helt, to rect,if Y. It is difficult to assert that a mistake was made in the Profeasional /0 Witiexcial designation. of this; articular site in 1903 because of the exten s ats0 uthatneti iraned deliberations regarding. site that OCCa.° red . Nevertheless, - tae believe that the mist t we,s made here, and .in other } .. �akn �� e loco ions throughout the city was th hough tio�n was paid %o � P y P� •atten ,� the x.eed for multi le Tamil rosidmedal o rtunit ies 'at locatiois but h ae this tha {c mre near major cer►ters employment � , ear r.,c arc a n � al centers, ne _ .M public tr ridoars. By a.ac:�lting major highway corcidot•e, ..and near near em a�� anent/ an ®it cor i � . rt . ce _ . rtur it ee reduieed 1 centers and With tar ct to trans ` rtation i ct wisps h igher density tesidentiial oppo uniti F n , an penden:�8 on. Pe � � PP de autowbbite trans rtaLton could have been roanoted o a .� _ ..� pc P gres� nt traffic congeatioan could a avt been avoided with positive in tt 0 y irrent Plan Map designates. -the ma jor3�c,y of rdreaeeavailable for lnewemultiple family res paw 'Far Jrra ti the.: o;u i 1 centers. 'the ,..rita�ary at bas ,atha akiPley iextt and comnerc a� P zY toarendetai gt ated ; i'or mv,iti -.f .ly hou0in0 opportunities are at the .far western ' and e !�utt*: este cn edv 4 of the e difficuXties .than.. hake arise, STAFF REPORT CPA 89 -07/ZC 89 -...07 (criterion gquit ies AGM 8 ve40 g - sand as rrapid „gro l'!,10' 'hatne. c ty .n 7 Beene al. A o T , cty ` , I r way. rk a 1 cc.i np1 i nt ire recent yea��.� hae been the great' i.ni oaee i i31, ` traff ig in tr no fly dvelop :areas in devei r ugt41, whicl re14de ets must pa.e ' their travels to X -9,e' Highway 217, .' 1 nt and caaacuerci al center e. Pravdinq nros�.ti- family �pportunit cas„ Hearse- the Triangle, the SW.72nsd Avenue Corridor', �Waehingrt0 ge aFe /L,incoln Center., th i central business district; ~ r e�c'': I-�5 ` and, llghway 1 man help orroet the aaicftyskes `of curs' 't �±lan ;designations' and iwite future Graf f is congestion. ,�! ± :We x 'thence£ r %a `�f ind t hat .,the current. �aeiga ation of this site can be ' categ©ria ed a mistake ` in diet i t reproeenta a loot opportunity to serve 'tlw t ity` as as whole thrraugh ' (locating alt% emilly housir oppo>, unities ol,�ie to typical tra it! ,,c a� tractora.� ��4 Y 1,yu such ''a • edir ion will . ''require difficult n'd6cisions regarding a cistinq neighborhoodts, such as "the Ria�lling :i,tilis neighborhood, but w0► ,,b+sli 0e,,,that' the density transition requirements of the Coioeaunity: Divelcpm a t code and'' cea°eful site, selection, .and,i site plan :strut any :can' ' be ut' ;alb ;ed .' to afford` ccSnpatibility betwean hou, ing `deve]lopx<ents of diffeiring inteneLtios. Wei'' ind that the subject site.: is ' ideally lted With. egard to the ` Plan +' s' locati©nal criteria for multiple ,.kemily. residential.' .apportunities, especially 'with reaper 't to proximity to eeiIpl nt 'tenors enil highway and transit, access. WC,. r�lso find t,'! >� t .the applicalta' ; coneeptea , , site Cpl an , illustrates how the density,' , tran.ition' roguiritlen4,. , Hatnd ' careful. site planning could Make high `deli tyr residential wuse of this Site largely compatible with' the adjacent low. density re'sid.434 development. RBCOMIFtNDATIO1T eaerid upon, the findings and conalusiona listet above, the Planning Division Planning f�ssio f srdlr : a reo en "fail approvalaof PAt89tO7 /Ite `,b9" -®7 for the j praape inns -High Etedideht- is , tkemsit y anti �t -29 . .. PREP. BY: er,7 f f er • t X t Gs h iden As .- ant Planner anner een3.er Planner STAFF REPORT = ` 'CP7l 89 -07, C 89--07 (Criterion Equ . iies) - PAGE 'y� LI ' r • - .a { MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON;` Planning Commission DATE: October 3, 1989 FROM: Jerry Offer and Deborah Stuart Assistant Planners SUBJECT: Metro Housing Rule Compliance The Metropolitan Housing Rule (Oregon Adminiutrative Rule 660, Division 7) .requires that, e y for all denrelop8bled residential land. the average dena3.t allowed dent I� 9 planning could affect the per �. Two Plan amendment ro sals before You g o ld a within a Cty•a .acre►. thin th$ � t e osi frs,� � Pa area be a minimum h overall housing ppo y ' density on lands that are *- ou ®in o z�tunit index or allov�able classified residential lands. hest fled b the Plan as buildable r��si The City's Plan, as acknowledged by LAC in 1984. inventoried 1,311 a& tes of developable residential land in the city. Zoning at that time provided for a opportunity of ,13 , 110 un €tei, exist meeting' politan; Housing ,Ru]# e housing Ppo y � g'the Metro standard. , Since that .time, e$ Cht Plan dmendments have been approved which have affected the inve ry 9 P inventory of nto Those redesi •nations, Provide a current inv ®�ato 1,290 acres and a housing opportunity for 13,112 units (1016 unite per acre). The .two Proposals before re the Con aieeion will have ave ' ®waewh a t cOunter nt ®s effects on the amoun t of developable residential c9 g 'the housing opportunity index. The Gross proposal sal (CPA 89 -08 /ZC 89-08) would reduce amount of developable residential land b y approximate) y 2 sexes and she ho using opportunity index by 47 units. The Criterion Equities pxopDeal (CPA 89 =07 /ZC 89- ' of developable 125 land nite. a�e of asst of t�n�re 07) would increase the amount and the City's housing opportunity index by 12pae SF g PPo y ylo .ale land proposals, singly and jointly, on the developable lands inventory and the housing opportunity index' is displayed below. Approval of Gross proposal Developable acres -= 1,288 acres Potential dwelling unite 13,065 unite Housing opportunity index - 10.14 Approval of Criterion 'Egnitien proposal Developable acres - 1,295 Potential dwelling unit - 13237 dwelling unite `Housing opportunity index 10.22 Approval of both proposals Developable acmes' - a' 293 Potential Dwelling units Housing opportunil +y index TO: acres 13.190 dwelling unite 10,20 units /acre • TIGARD MANNING OON/ISSI > JLftR FI�iG -- , �' 08ER 3, 1989 President Moen cal',' ;w.1 the meeting to order at ',:35 1 PM. , The meeting ways held at the Tigard .:ivic Center TOWN HALL - 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. . ROLL Present: President Moera; commissioners, Castile, Ifre, Lever_ +;t, Rosborough, and Saporta. Absent: Commiseioners Barber, and Peterson. Staff: Assistant Planner Jerry Of for (left 10 :00 PM); Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart; Planning Secretary Diane M. Jeldtarke. APPEDVAL OF mINDTES Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Rosborough seconded,`` to approve the minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present. Commissioner Saporta abstained` • PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION President Moen announced that Agenda Item 5.3, an appeal from er,D 3 regarding manufactured hues, is being postponed to the October 17th' Planning Commission hearing. . PUBLIC BEARINGS 5.1 CAN SIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-07 AND !ONE CHANGE ZC 89-07 A request for oval of a comprehensive Plan Amen (commercial Professions I+.�T�GSi�t- �� foam �.aamerc • � 1 approval Medium-iii t: Denait ) 9 y residential and a Zone Change from C-P (Commercial Profeeeional) to R -25 (legidential, 25 unite ) O (COmmercial Professional) LOC?TIoN: West aide of SW 72nd Avenue, between /acre ZONE: CAP .• , n SW ::Yarns Street and SW F,3.r Street (WCTM 251 1DB, tax lots 800 & 801, 251 1DC, tax lot 3600) Ag sintant Planner Jerry offer reviewed the proposal a'Ad staff's reasons for recommending approval. Cawed regarding maxi cacuu building heights of pthe existing i and Discussion oposed donee and the - densit �, transition rewired between a R -3.5 and R-25 zone. Mao d y transi q. . � .� ecussed �rs.e �i�y the staff was recommending approves of the R -25 rather' than the R 12 zone. APPLIcANT S PRESBNTATY N o Mark Rockwell, Criterion 8qui t r one main Place, 101 SW Main St., 97204, reviewed the exietin M "" ' i.es, 18o Portland, OR 972 ° . condition of the Property and Uses which would be Permitted under the exiating` C-P1 Pe Zoning:, He xevi+aYaed reasons or 'rrnd the need for the proposed` change from C -P to Residential and why R -25 versus R -12 would be better suited: for the 9ru arty: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • 19h9 P21G ' 1 N' b I In Baugh .i`;ahran, ;CTAK Architects►, . 17355 SW Boc nes Ferry Road, Lake Oswego, OR 9703:5, explained that this . proposal would minimise' exposure to the single famlLy residential area and is not 'designed to the maximum density which, would be p€.tmitted. Re compared design and site development review', standards between the C -P and R -25 zone. He stated that the traffic from an R -25 development could have lees conflict during peak times than C -P traffic and that they are willing to commit to the doSign concept that they are proposing. TN]f 'gm= rssT o Kraig ,:Hopkins, NPO * 5 Chairierson, stated that the NPC wasp ivapreaaed with. proposal. However, .'they are supporting the neighborhood in their apposition to the propsaal They feel that the Comprehensive Plan provides for orderly develoitiment of the area ,and that the C-P zoning, should be :maintained o Jack Stiger, - Steiger <EnterPrisese Inc., 10250 SW Greenburg Road, Tigard, OR. 97223, stated he has shown the site several times and feels that the site is better suited foe a high quality, high density reeidential, use. c' Gordon King, 4214 SW 51st Place, Portland, Or 97221, Commercial. Realtor. for Cushman Wakefield stated he had ''Passed on listing this site as it is inappropriate for commercial professional.' use and would be better suited to high density residential. bale .Roseman, 13355 Tigard, from, the 3365 SW a6th, ' Ti ard, CRS, 97223, lives 200, feet fr t end of the project. supports .. . west the value of e recommendation for approval. He felt it would increase p pe y and enhance the area for future development. Raymond Ems, 13440 SW 76th, Tigard, OR. 97223, had owned the majority, of the laud that le now tL Rollin Hills Subdivision. He felt the proposal' up the g high demand for residences in would clean u the area,. that there is a hi p y J five this area, and that there are robabl 500 ab'la„ within a f FDA oba avail minute walking distance from the proposal.' bavid Hotzgeri Rt. 4 Box ,257c1, Sherwood, OR. , repraentinq Tcrie mother who owns thii property, stated that th0 P. oporty has ben .listed xor,> 9 years' and they have been told repea'edhir that thie le a . 0 use. we added that a large number of off ices> ,across they atre�at have N 9 remained vacant. They have had eeveeal offers for the front half ti their property which would leave the back bath;, which vbuts thug l raga dential; area:* with a Structure that would 'be c�nn6 rutted oar less qualit 4, than the; medti- family structures proposed. , _ lives two to tir _ 1 ' o James Powell, 7880 SW Fir, Tigard, d�.. Free 'hoiieae away Ho was co0cerned that it had been decided LW 81/84 hcw t he Bite would develop and that now there is a change in thinking, and the developer wants to change . He was opposed to the cha'ng`e in principle Discussion regari .f the Comprehe ..: g g p naive Plan Amendment , preee: PLANNING commISsION MIWuTES - , 1989 - Pa.GE 2 Bob Sudlow, 7530 Ski'; yarns, Tigard, OR. 97221. supported the proposal. He would Prefer etatgLe ' 'family residential but realizes that t Le : not Practical. , : d there has been no . ' ract�cg He ss;taltc growth under the ' current' ' circumstances and felt :. the propneal would increase property values. Currently the rea,iderstia,t area is an island 'And, if the site is developed. as commercial professional it will ' urther fragment the residential: :.eland. Staff submitted ' . letters � r support' from Leonard Ludwig, First iPortland Leaning c°rp. ; John Decosta, Professionals 100; Jim and ti:lncy Wi yn; and Wallace ,Harding, Harding Fletcher Cowpany. Bruce MacKay', 7430 SW 'Cherry Pr.. Tigard, ' OR. 97223, abuts the south boundary of the property. He had investigated the toning at the time of Purchase and had ,made his decision to -buy on the basis that the abutting property would develop as commercial profe siona1 and opposed changing the zone to Multi- familyy Jerry Rowe, 13280 SW 76th, Tigard„ OR. 97223, ,'lives adjacent to the proposal and had purchased his home' a year end ,a half ago because of large lots and lbw traffic. Ho felt if the site is' developed ,,,i *e commercial profeaeional, the traffic would end after ,5 :00 pm. 1f the site developer as multi- fammily, he felt traffic would occpr at all ,,,hours, that higher crime rate would result, and that the multi- family area 'would not be maintained to the neigh 4orhood a reel standards. He questioned how ° many times will they have to face` rozoning issues? the request. he stated that this s Piricl, 7 ,745' SW aeorfi issue or opposes the eqv , g site had been neither , Ray Varna. Tigard. a m � ssza .during the Comprehensive Plan Process. .ori originally it was zoned i -P � i ,� g Y and are a ccmap�; ae was zoned C-P. He added that the Rolling Sills Subdivision is a special case and the City had made a commitment to Protect the subdivision and he felt the City should Ikonor that comMitment. 'Carla Guerra, 7670 SW Cherry Drive, Tigard, OR. 97223, was concerned what PPe i. cdould ha n to other ad scent vacant land if this site is allowed to change to high density residential. She oppooed the change. 9' g Y Joanne Bieker, 7730 SW Cherry, Tigard, OR. 07223, requested that the property remain C-P. She did not feel the City had taken care of problems such as the apartments to the north of the subdivision. B_._ i. ltli e cox, 13320 S 76th Ave., �v ® . Tigard, d, CR . 97. 2 23, stated they ha purchased their property two and a ha l�� y ears a go knc,•/,,in g that the,aated C - P zoning' They d not hav purchased if the property had d been zoned for multi - family. she stated the eubdivie'ion hasp approaei atei;y 65 well kept lots and that „the proposal would more tha ri double the silo quiet, lar ©, g pop tion. She rvae also concerned that property value would go down. PLANNING (0MMIssIoN miNuTES , ,1969 PAG': 3 1 Ron ,Eaton, 13395 SW 72nd Ave., ,Tigard, OR 97223, resident for .L8 year was concerned about what effect. the Proposed exit/entranfim,i4oula have on ,'h1,1,1' road. His tither 'conderne were that crime .strottlii increase' evening and weekend noise would increase, population would ttriple , and 'what would happen to the other vacant eight acres to the south which are in close proxiasity to thia site v,..long 1'ir Street. • , • , . - . - . . . ,' ,, . 1 - , . - - - . . - .. , , . ', . ' , . - . - ' ' ' , - ' - . , ', ,.., . ,''.. , '' ' - : ''' • '. , ' ,: . . • .•' . : ,.. : ' ,, ....• .' ' ' . '',.; - .- - . , - ' • ..H., _ ' : ; . , SIsag*.biti1.' Takehatiliii,'7610, SW Cherry .:11r0.,,,....Tigard, ,OR.,:'972230 ,,sttited''.:,itihe, ,han",,,,,,',,,..„:„.,,,:::' be9n. .41''Itiaber.:,Of '14P0 • "# ,,,5, .since' '4,981.' and ,1.they' 4a46.;:;.lia4:„...ta.., 'peotect., f 010... Tketiott!..kw.ht;o4 . aqattletl. Tech ,,c.ener.., ,Hilleideilisint1.1cer„ and., the ,plaint.','.' '.., ' - ..'...'.. . . , , • _ . , . _ ,...._ ..„,, . , .. , • , • .. „, :.• She'',did.,'.'llot ''feel,, ..that *here...Wis.:, an error,. in the, plan and if there is ' a need fol. additional .', multi-family ' , that ' :the '.‘ 'Tigard , Triangle: . •Shc:tuld. • ' be , . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. ,. .,. ,... evaluated ;'' for that it00.',' L''!..' ,'' ' ...,' ' .:' , ,.., . ''..,' , ..'' ,,•.,.;': .,' ,- , ,,,, Ed Gordon 7475 SW , Che rry Dr., Tigard, OR. 97223, stated he owns apartments and has concerns for the problems that h.i.oh density living creates such as traffic at all hours. He opposed the,chtinge. , Dennis Worznick, 7495 SW Cherry, TI.garct, OR. 97223, oEpossed the reqsae t. }2e :felt that lack of 11\0u/sing ehottld be put J.ts the Tigard Triangle. He srzas concerned that adjacent vacant property tvosild be changed to R-:'a s if ,thl.szs proposal. a approved. , 011211 .Tackac'ag780 SW Varna, Tigard, Or. 97223, looted on the north side of the project likes the look of the project, however, hap.concernes regarding crime, noise, and air quality from fireplaces rireg Webero 7425, SW Varna, Tigard, OR. 97223, Oppoded the requeirt. fle wails concerned about air pollution rind traffic. Tom Brian, 7630 $W Fir, Tigard, OE. 97223, nearby, not aiijacent, I did not feel. a substantial, change „hall been made to justify the change and that market changes come and go. Many owners had purchaged hone s based upon the existing zoning and he felt the Comprehensive Plan should be relied upon. He noted that the criteria ia the same for R-25 zone' a0 it ia fat the C-P zowit, that the City is in cOmpl.iance with the housing goal, that residenti.a.1 ueea (R-40) are allowed in the Tigard Triangle above the first fl.00r, and that if housing, ie targeted in the wrong area thie ohould be addressed during periodic, review. lie. added that a neighborhood meeting had voted 30 to 3 to keep the C-P none and that economic: circumstances should not bra balanced on the backs of thi, neighborhood. He requested denial. HoweVer, if the Commission chose tim *recommend approval he aUggested that the. :ipplicant be required to sLt with the neighbOrhood and come Up with tiame r4itatrictirs covenants. • , • „ . Atitek . Stated L that:, the appii.Oanta are wi11in to Ctitagalt!i tito-, A reettictive covenante.. He felt that the 'retttiOn :the .sseStifhtirts are happy- , ' , • with the zoning ,bedattie the Vtitarit '1Ati'Ve the „ ot e:cposecl to the' uties whiCh be gottlemittiad, ,OtivekitY 'Of *ihi,,,th WOUld �t end at 5:00 PM■ In Adaitiohi they could have a 4"'.itdot tali dedtiOiat.4,' OtAKNINa'comMt810N MINUTES , 1989 PAGE 4. , \`‘ bulletin feet from their property . line. He felt , 9 year was !a .,.long tinE if ' to ask a ; propperty owneir to 'be patient. Also, that traf f is ` : ?u !be` a 1d 50% ;' , lees than .a commercial development and would , not pitenetrate the neighborhood. He felt that ':he concerns for increased crime ;sire unfoundEkd, and that even bonitos in the Rolling Hills Subdivision 'have .'bee:,r....allowed run down; that the $50/000 l units T they,`' proposed would ,' not, denigrate but would"Anhance the area and iricreaeie': home values w Be • did not, .feel then fl -40 density allowed above the first floor in the Triangle, wan serious zone as it hag not even been able to work downtown Portland. PUBBIIC Emmucagg, Cuomo o Coa niciaioner Leverett favored the request. o Commissioner . . Roeboraii h, felt that this s .a high qua its pr po al. However, he was unsure whether the criteria had been net. !. did not, feel a mistake had been made. Coamaiesioner Castile was impressed c•-P tone should be preserved. with the design, however, he felt the commissioner Fyre felt that this is a good developments however, there are no guarantees that thie is the project that would bas constructed. He did not feel that the had been met for a change. He felt that criteria perhaps the entire area a ould be looked at for a change to multi-*family.. CaMcnissioner Saporta di d not feel the 'criteria had been met. President Moen° was concerned that the criteria had not been met to warrant g p abutting R-25 1 and R -3.5 'zones. 'Be felt a �i'zr�.i�i e. He had a problems with that densitY transition and buffering help, however Rollin, Hills I is unique and the +l;'ity did make a 'commitment tb P rotect the 'subdivision,. Commissioner Fyy1re moved and commissioner Castile seconded to forward cP14. 59 -01 and T.� •� City sal' did not meetn criteria to allot.: that the ro C 39 07 to City Council with a r- r en based. on the finding p po low a change in the Comprehensive Plan. . E Sc 9 -Q,8. GROSS. NPMPKE;tNS' oval. of a renen8iv ®� Plan, dome y B 20NIti cET�hNG ®nd�een�.i troan NPO #7 A � PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89 Q P _ .. Medium -High Dei'isity $91-de01al to Neighborhood connercial and a Zbne Change from Ft -25 (Residential, 25 ,(Commercial,' Neighborhood) ZONE: R 25 (Residential, 35 'units /aice),.. 1. HOP,4100$'!4''', Southwe8t • corwar of the in "ersection Of SW Scho�,ls Ferry' ...Hoard' and SW ,I 26th ;Avenue. ('WCTM 1SI 33C tax' .ot 100 .w • taL t Planner' Deborah .Stuart Q Y iv wed ti a proposail, the propoeed .road) Aesis l impro' ement®,, and `madet staff recon*nendat denial. • i ion for PLANNING c MMISSYON N.INOTES - , 1989 = PAGE ( MAIO MAIM �i: PROFESSIONALS 100, INC., flEALTORS® Mr. Jerky Offer Community Development Department City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Armendment and Zone Change for 13265 S. T. 72nd.' Avenue; 2S1 'DS, tax lots 800 ,& 801, a Portion of 2S1 1DC, tax lot 3800)' He OsWet Dear Mr. Offer: Based on my _ experience in marketing the property, there-are several reasons why 1 recommend approval of the proposed Covnprehensive Plan Ammendrent o First, the site is not large enough to accommodate. C -P projects of substantial scope and quality. Second, the site is disproportionately deep in relationship to its width and frontage on S.W. 72nd,. This eliminates most C -P developments as greater width and vi "pibility 'are, nearly always important requirements. These limitations result in two small sites. One on the front that is 2 -2.5 acres, And the balance of the pr iperty in the back making uP 'a second "landlocked" site of a similar size. If the current zoning is maintained, 1 fully expect the property will be divided into two parcels, as We have had interest from various' individuals to Purchase the front Portion to build a small office or ;cr?mmercial building. That leaves the "l ardl ocked" back half-Of the, property undeveloped and with relatively little value. Given these circumstances, I would not anticipate that the development on the property will be of high quality,_ particularly on the back half: However, if the Comprehensi ve Plan a.� ri. change en t>'t ..nt and :zone are made, the opposite is true. The size, shape, and locat .on of the property are excellent for accOmmoAating a high quality multi- family development. Furthermore; the change would help to adjust asignifi' . available land. At present there is•a'large asuppl in PP1y available .in undeveloped C -P land yet them n, is ' o R - 25 land or near the Tigard Triangle. Sincerely, oh , Decosta Branch • kruse Wcocls One ; 5285 S. III. Meadows d Suite 161, lake OVVago,1 1• 503)' USE Wl re 4�\V, 1�•l :I Pr, (Keith 8. 'Eiden eniar Planner mun Dave' ent Depar rnent ��yy pp ►i',"T OP'TiE3APlD REGoN 3125 S.W. Hall Blvd. l e►rd, rwon 97223 �= City Council hearing scheduled r 7:30 p.m.,October 23, 1989; pr pensive Plan Amendment CPA 89-07, Zone Change ZC 89.07 A►s we d6,8cussed on the , ,. he tee phone earlier this morning, Criterion Equities and the the Rollin Dials subdivision are having constructive discussions concerning; the above referenced •. om.,,., rehensive Plan Amendment and dam' Change. m R e Zone w;r g In view of these discussions and the on i� tiQ effort . at) �► b�I the neighbors q at a mutually sat s ectot c€'r uslon, we re 11 Criterion ,...,E aides to arrive request that the public hearing scheduled fC�rr Monday, OctobCr 23rd at 7:30 n p 9 We are h .. y� d 3� we week nod. re l open i that given the addit1 jai time, be set over for a two w e be successful in satisfying the neighbors cc►r'carns. COMM kCJAL ti A estArt AvtsrmEigrs ti. BNDA' . ITEN V • STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION NEARING' DATE: , Cctobez ' �, 1989 '- 7:30 P NEARING LOCATION: Tigard City Hall 0. Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 FACTS General Information. CASH t comprehensive Plan h ►endment (IPA 89 -01 /,Zone Change $C 89 -07 144 QUEST: 1) Plan Map Amendment frosm, , Cotor,bercial Prof eaaional to Medium -Nigh Dena %y RReatdentia1, 2) Change . - strative 2 Zone chap • froea �. P QProfea►i.onal /Admini Office Commercial) to R -25 (Waltiple -Fa oily ReeideEtial, 25 Unite Per Acre) APPLICANT: Criterion BguitiOs (Marcie Rockwell) 1800 ° :e Main Place 101 8W Main Street Portland, OR 97204 OWNERS: David Metzger P.O. Sox 275 Sherwood. OR 57140 (Tax Lots 800 & 801) AGENT: OTA , Inc. (RaS,,ph Tahran) 17354 SW Rnonea Ferry Rd. Layer Oswego, OR 97034 Raymond 'Ems 13400 SW 76th Avenue'' Tigard, OR 97223 (Tax Lot 3600) LOCATION: 13265 8W 7211d Avenue. Approximately 5.03 acre located On the west aid ,,u of SW 72nd Avenue, "between SW Varna Street and SW Fir Stroet (nee vicinity 'map. Page 1°) PROPERTY DBSCRIPT ON: W TM 281 xDB, Tax Lots 800 and 801 VcTM 251 10c, Tax Lot 3600 (portion) Background Information Creation of tax lots S00 and 801 from a single parcel was approved'' through Minor Land Partition 14LP 3. -81. The Plan and zoning designations for these parcels were changed rrci R •4 (Residential, 7.500, aquare feet minimum lot size) to their current Commercial' Profeeeional /C -P design a ore during city -w%de Plan and zonin g map revisions in 1983. No other previous �� lanA .se or deve lo PP pment applications re .. ..... .. gardin these ..,. proportiee have been re.Lewed,by the City.` STAFF REPORT CPA 89 -07 /ZC 89 -07 (Criterion quit$es - PAGE y►icinity information Ad,'j acent prope'zTtiee to the north, we, rt, and ecietaweet are zoned (Rmeidential, 1.5 united Per acre) 'flud arm developed with single family residences. ProPerhiee diractlY south of the site are zoned C-P and are presently vacant or occukied by single family :residences Properties across SW 72nd Avenue from the site are also, zoned C-P. Theoo properties axe developed with ' a number r ,,g office, buildings containing a vari .9ty of commercial and professional usen. The subject site has. 367 feet ::,g frontage on SW 72nd ?venue. 8W 72nd i►�rre? :ue is '' fenctionaliy classified an a major Collector etrect on the Cit'!'a Transportation Plan Mapo SW =nd Avenue is developed with 44 fnwt ; os pavement, 'curbs, storm dz-: ins, and a a ew a1k - Q s. J ng the ► te' n f roistage � 'athe site has slightly more than 600 feet of frontage a 74ng SW Fig Street. SW Fir Street caxlaist* of �\ l cc voted right =of- 9r / t of eve . th of WAY which dead soda into the dei'ewa res of resident,:!® to tbc' sou the Bite. The Transportation. Plan Nap derigaates SW Fir Street as a local street. Fully d &veloped local atreets typically consist of 58 feat of' public right -of -wa improv d with full street in provemants. . S ite . Information_and Proposal Dieecripttion The subject property coraeiea. of three panels totalling aprroaimately 5.03 acres, including a 15.5' foot by 630 foot saki:tion 01 tax .lot 3600 t -, ved parcels. Tl a raMa' .der of tax of 3600 is not included in� the i .xc. zed' Plan Map Amendment and of tax So Zone Change Proposal. Tax lot 800 contains a house , in ate northeaster» terrier. The ..:tiler pazrcele are vacant. Ths a .to r „ontaias a grove of 'treats in the, northeastern corner of the siitLe. The tisidainder Of the site r 3:s n stly open and covered with gra0Ses, roe e, and fruit trees. The parcels arcs relatively flat with a slight 0Xr1-0 toward the east. men . from PP � � P t�.al and a zone rci�1 ` licar�G►3 L® e®i- �i .Plan M► daaent from to Medium :nigh D� nsity pees ea chang3 ' Profeeeional, �� ® a �� f d � ,;.,, � ,. � � � p ry' C -P c,P,.ofeae:,ional /Add tnietrative Of .ice Co rtial) t e R '25 Multi. le- Family Residential, 25 Units Pezz` Ace) for the eubjeot ptrce1a.. Although a de velo pme nt Plan fo r the heed bttibi itted for a propoeed„0an /zone `'change', a cor(eptual ei>~o p�;an illustrating `how the Bite might be developed with a multiple- faanily z�a ®ident.a3 ' development has been provided by the applicante The intuit, iin providing the conce tual 60,e' ' plan was to , illuPtrate ti'hat as ' mu'ltipie- family development t ® comP em y e nte c uld b onaty r uctee 1.�o. ;;no , e _tnr it COde e s deh®1.y transition e *' qu te: Code Section 16:40.6"10(A), requires that a withial ldeii .t ei o not be - devel.o at a r y . es�Cablashed q�'nt of the allows. de3ni�it� aA es � 1 greeter thhttn 12 5 pee: .e y ( peecif led 1`ey then. Co l►reheneivea Plan designation' ;rather than the currant u, m STAFF RE i7QT 89- 07 /ZC 89 -07 ( C it 3rian !quiteB) f, .xV 1• w n 1 ■ eeiauation) of the a j '� areas ''. f'or the d d seer,'., .r,b�li>a,'�ed residential gut propertiea, , area wit1 ast ,1.00,-,feet of the :Rolling 'Hills suibdivision to the rierth an wee ,r., ou7 .not . ;ter' developed atirk density greater than 6.25 !mite per, ac:La . because the mazia i, ill ty- allowed by the Plan's Lea Density Eeeidentia1 a pp ied t Hi11_ iP 5 Rolhir unite per acre. mem. and NPO Cents The Engineering Division' has reviewed the request. and has 'commented that development ' of tea mite with . gin . multiple - family resident; at development in the R-25 ',,cone, would r4nerate .substantially fewer vehicle trips per, work day on adjacent ,streets , as well as leaser trafflo peaks at typical AM and PM rush hours as compared to office deve1opaa.' :t i s tie eeLeting C-P sone, . Development of the site under either the C-P R -25 zone. would require increasing the rights -of= way for both' SW 72nd Averse and SW ai,-' Street and would also require eubratantial improvements to SW, Fir Street. Storm and sanitary sewers to e67:vo the site are available in SW 72nd Avenue., Mc', #5 has reviewed the proposal and has ,consented that they bo1ieve thi yet the majority of the neighbors of the subject ' property o,/apose the prz j ag et w Planning Division ataff atttended a neighborhood' meeting for revisw of F tlhe p / rroo pn e e s aaal� o Sadie nt neighbor. co ientsc) that they favored the proposed 1.41 because te 7P o pportu. nity for a quality develo e n tite oppo be 1004041,00 the site u ra■ier • nubea r oId f noighborA voiced opposition to the propoaa3 and 3deicomeente retated totem. Lal 'd not efor3�ood I traf f is on eva►:ninge axed wee ►nds �, the po it Lal s# d no effect" this proposal 'might have on lateen rezo4in 9 LO the neighborhood, the compatibility between low derisfty ,mid fit In dez411eity development, the additional'muit i -fam y hou+tinq opportunities, and the effe t t is °proposed actioei might: have on neighboring propertie0, value.a Other 'cos me are area to epeoific,t iteme the nefyhbore felt should i* conei orad in the nevi r of a. "eito developments 'plan for the 'property. The Suildin Dlyieion the Ti-ar g . g °d 5'rhaol District, xund lietagacr�c Wa1�ex , Dl,otrict have reviewed the regueet arnd made n'o aomnei tecl ors ob jectioiie1' ttOrding the ro sal. No othoi comments wire received. FINDINGS AND CONCLUS: ONS The relevant o 10' 12, '46 "$4 Flats J.ic ;v s 2,41 t 5.5.1, 6.0.1, 7.1.2, 8.2.2, 9.10 2 and Cha t zi 12 . p e.. r ;rational Criteria anal , th�a c�ax�g�l oz STAFF RBFORT A 89 -07 /8c 89 -o' (Cra.terion 3quitiee yta , stake, quasi.judicial map also ndment:criteria Plan and Community Dev =xa; ., ?pent Cadre. The Plannin g n: Di ieio concludes 'that the propose t is -.: consistent wi i' h the agplfcabls statewide Planning Goals and Cuidelinss 'binsaiDd,updn the `>EolOwing findings o.f both tat,e Cc a%prehevieiv Goal #1 (Citins3 Involvement) ' is met bectuse tie City has adopted a citizen have a ent program `, includi ng rc ier: of ialil, development applicatio z by neighborhood Planning Organizations (HP0) . additiei , all ub] is notice requireannts have been satisfies for this application., Goal ' #2" (Land use Plaannitg) in net because the City 'has applied all • applicable Statewide Plaliniiig goals, City Comprehena ,ve Plan Policies 'and nd Community Dev eloPment roc's requirements to the , review of the Proposal- Goal #9 (Hconom ' of thii ` State) is satisfied. although the ';proposal 'would ' reduce the Cit • s inventor? of developable commercial land, b dose 1) the reduction' of 0-P 'zoned land Pro Posed is not a large amount` coo pared to the "total amount: of d velopable 0-P i ttoned . lend in the immediate area and the Tigard Triangle area. P and 2). allowing multi faelily develo nt near c•�P and Y -P :zoned., opab ' pace � z devAl 3s .propertie.5 may provide an attractive mix of and assn theraby, helping spur cos► . raial and industrial development in the area. Other c . muniti es 4 have shown that such a mix of lard uses can euccessfull co -exist without adversely affecting commercial or industrial growth. pp Pointed' the neighboring Kruse ''lay area of '' Lake Oswego where such a mixtt,7to Ohs a lioantei . have g exists. ' L' re of land uses Coal #f 0 (Housing) is satisfied because the proposal will prcvJLde for additional housing off, pertuni.tiee as promoted by the O ty ° a Comprehensive Plan and the Metropolitan Housing �•lc (Oregon v . 660, Di 7) pp the Administrative Rules, chapter vision 7 • h � the C��r ' e rova�.� . P pc ing .. opportonitiee on oil Yh . ro er..l wound ncrea�ee houaa 1 elopable residential tail s by a total of 125 dwelling units. deve].nalew�uld aTHe Metros li:nain aHc�sin�R�lei>�eesiree that$�i`f : :.wily PP P . y Pm P© gi g ..r-y . yr rate ft�r d the :1 it maintain a minimum housing c��° rtv�niti� gable hand of 10 units per acre and a minimum 50/50 opportunity mix for single family and multi - family housing. Goal #12 • Tran�:pcairtetion a1 #1 And Go ( a �" " � 3 (Bner9y Cone, Ar.ionl satisfied through; Providing the oppo rtunit intensive tat ' use near ' maior transportation co=ridora (High ray 227 and h5) an Well 's near .1mp1oyment centers .i This promotes effictien l. use of the transportation system thereby prz tir,' energj;t con$02rvat4i61 „ The Planning taff has det ereri g � fined that the Ptoposa conbietent ��'�with SmFr } ?RT CPA, 94 O7 /2C 8 0 ( :i. ita►rJ.on q -IQs »:, PAGE 4 1 4; •r } applicable Portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings not'' below: ▪ Plan Policy 2.1.1 ig• . Veat ',:aif .eel because 'Neighborhood ; Planning organization 65 and surrounding, property owners ,were given notiee of. the ' hearing and an opdrtunity to comment on the proposal. I n addition, the applicant, have met with the immediate neighbors of tho site to ' present their p, opoial in advance of the public hearings. . .Plan Policy .5 1.1 is satisfied lafacaus ®' the proposal would provide the opPrtuntty for 'akiditioltal multi - family development and would 'increase the 'n,at housing .op ortunity on buildable ::.ands in ,., the City. This is detailed in discussion f or statewide Planning Goal 10 cbove and tha attached memo regarding tho effect of both current plan /sent amendment prolpoeale on the City's compliance with_ the Metropolitan. Housing Rule. ▪ Plan policies 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 will be satie.;ied because the proposal would allow for dovalopi ent of the proPerties i ; ways that way be 'more compatible with adJacant, established', low density, residential areas than the currefl ly permitted uses of the C -P zone would be. Tutun:e residential development of the parcels will be aublect tc denal;ty transition limitations within 100 feet of the Low Density Residential Plan designated area to the aocth and vast of the site. These limitations would tend to losern imps';cts en ad;cent properties to a greater extent than code requirements' applicable to deve1 Anent e sale under the current Plan and zone designations. Zoth the p pap Pla existing - zoning dle s�i gn ation and the p�f e�1�zoning designation allow a maximum building height e. Thc^rP :.zone. requires 20 foot side yard and rear yard setbacks from r#.ssaidential zones and thus under the current zoning deeignatlon, a 45. fmot tall 11 building could ce� uewithin 20 fast of the Abutttgdeveloa� residential parcels. Zecae the denjitY transition requirements oi' policy 6.3.2(a) and Commuu'ity Development code Section ' 16."40'.040(A) wo'31d apply if she properties were zoned R -25, it is unlikely neat . be built t . 11 idorild '. wf hin 100 feet of the ro than two stories "tall buildings m�,;.�ti� -famfl resident p ��ies• boun�lar ere with ,adjacent al developed residential parcels much lees within 20 feet of tIoae prove tiea. The applicants' conceptual site plan i11ustratee how dovelovraent of the site might ocvnr in light of the density transfer requirements. while, the housing ',;ypaae allowee in the acliitCent zone and the R -25 zone proposed for this site assay' be ! uk tantially diffarent, the density ti requirements along with e requirements regarding l a�d�catransition ia g and buffering used to make the differing housing t YP ue �-�4m P atible. Ptan Policy 6.5.1 will be eatici'ied, through rekview of as development: ropoaal for the Elite 'thteugh then Site .. Rev ... ,� �ie�► and :building' p p that, developane rats on , the site will rt¢� ;;� r�aview, rocesees �co assure t 9 ✓ � � Pe # not ctreate nuIaanres and that all, bu�tldin .a will. comply W th the Untfcrm Building Code. STAFF RP ' +)RT - CPA 8� - O ? /gG 89,-07 (criterion Equities " -r PAGi:5 1 u: Plan Policy/ 6.6.1 will, be satisfied ♦through the ' imposition ' of buffering and screening requirements of the :Community Development Code, to any future development proposal for .the properties. Plan Policies 7.1.2, 7.2.1, , 7.4. �ana 7.6.1 are sa tisfied because 4, adequatM public service 4apacitiers are available . to serve potential development on the properties. . Plan 'Policy 7.8.1 is satief ied because the Tigard School District was informerl of this\ proposal. The School District has :rot commented that the proy,,Saed addition of housing opportunitieb within the District would cause exce ded capacities in the District's schools. Imo School District has been making' plans for increased school capacity through several prelims ::try 4' school construction and expansion ,proposals for which funding as been 'a roved through the school 'funding tax g pp regent levy y-e�queet . ▪ 'Plan Policy 8.1.1 commits the City to plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway ' + system that meets .current needs and anticipated 'future development. This polioy would be satisfied, because opne resulting from the proposed of these parcels development res ersd redseignatf. would tend to ,reduce .the anticipatiad traffic onto SW 72nd Avenue and other nearby :;reets as compared to develot under, the current g ,�• street developed with Bonin SW 72nd Avenue is a major tollea,�r str th primarily commercial and industrL 1 uses >•**a with good 'connections to several arterials. Although ra• #,dential use of the site would he anticipated to generate more nighttime and weekenci traffic than most of the permitted uses in the current C-4ti ��one, that traffic would be expected to be on Sea 72nd Avenue and not on looa1 streets in the adjacent rosidential *eight rhood. The Engineering Division will review any future development proposal for the property and may require improven`anta to affected public streets to redcce impacts reeultinr; from future developments. • futn policy. ev o nt of kite ro rtise. T vecessa' street v ovemeente 8.1.3 will be satisfied as ax condition of approval of anY future da el P� p he - 'Y � ti! would be required at the tim9 of develops' nt. The city's Engine ring any _ pme� ` rope Division will review an future, deve�ld d►1 proposals' for the properties. 1 Plan Policy 6.2.2 is satisfied becauea Tti-?Let offerer bus service on SW 72nd Avenu6 on which the parcels have flrontate. Therefore, the propossd redeuignation would locate an intensive type ; of development within c1ooe P roximity to an existing public transit route, 11. Plan Policy 9.1.2 is satisfied because the proposed re designation would pr o vide t he opportunity unity for high density' ' residential,developm ent in prwalmity to transit routes, =jot h hwa e, And �- a . centers ther# b y promoting efficient too af the transportation y e a . ' A and reduces: energy con ®ucption. STAFF REPO 3T' - $ 80 -07 /ZC 89 -0 driti ride Equities) PA+G 0 . The Locationa2 Criteria specified ied in Chapter M.,2 of tho plan for m-Bi h Density Residential us* are oatiefied for the following i g rea,ecn ®: . The subject properties gate not co fitted to low density development., t . he .' b. Density transition, yi,u fei ing, and screening requ irements of Community Development . Code may be Used* to, Delp future development on the suh.je t properties compatible with ,neighboring Low density single family residences to the north and west• r;�:�; a► i�►jor The subject parcels have direct aces" to .8W 72nd Ave , and c• roxii ity to Highway 2�L coleaor street, and' are . in close p 1 -5, both which are functionally classified ae arterials. spent limitations affecting the pso3 irtes,, such as d. serious developee � steep elope vident. 'lsseiltal � e or poor drainage, are not nt� out the Public preeelat to serve future deve oPr . e 1 l.ic facilities are' p roperties and have sufficient capacity to serve any increa6)►® in demand caused by development of the s : e. e. - ,public transit is available on SW ' 72nd Avenue in front of the site. ro >'�ci ®e are located within one:. quarter mils ofa,bu business f. Thep Pe THe'site and office center across SW 72nd Avenue from the sate. is also relkJtiv9Zy close to the underdeve Tigard Triangle loped g area which is anticipated to be a major .euiploylfle nt center ' in the future. The applicants paint out that there are few thin family housing opportunities, developed or undevelopod, w► close pr€,ximity to this future major emPloYment canter. Development 9 , .... � :. and work. of additional housing near the Triangle may result in tween + home an reduced needs for automobile' commuting be The ; applicants point to the 'successes of the 'Cruse Way corridor to the east 3s an example for the Triangle area of a ouccdee*ft1 of high quality office development, mixed y. mix �� news, hi residential development; and limited retail development. distance from v'.. ienc®, retell' coy:_ �►n , Although the site is some aeiblo ,that, con;�enience services at this tinne, it le quite Po. retail used may become available as adjacent grope sties and the Triangle are developed. ; a anticipate that private open space as g The app licants a well a +d a® parr of deve►lopicm3nt . recreational facilities will be provied of the site. In .order t.: Pp .'` . , � .: , . � ... � evidence � �� aadohange in, o a � rove a quasi �t�licial ,amendaier�t , to the Plan i t also find t h there is idencer of ' w �.t� ceY ` the City mue i y a the ei..bj p AlterYiatideli�► nei "hbcanc�Nad a a - g r community which affect the City must find that there has, been a mistake or incor►siatend m, - ZC 89 -07 (Criterion Equ idea -� P14Gk 7 - a S'TA'FF RSp+C�T � CPA' 806i/ 7' the original designation of the parcel 'Comprehensive Plan, Vcluiae 2, Policy 1.1.1, Implementation Strategy 2; Community Development Code Section 18.22.040(A))• The applicants assert that a change in circumstances has occurred in that there is now a significant demand for housing opportunities within close proximity to employment cent ars. This sort of demand was not ae evident, Just a few years. age. Substantial recent growth in the region has led to increased traffic congestion and increased commuting times. Proximity to one's place of employL!ent is now as major factor in deooliding where' to call' home. The 'housing industry has responaled by dOveloping all densities" of housing close to employment center;. applicants point to the nei9 hborin4 lcruse Way area as ' an e, ample Tc f'' such a mixed use, mixed residential density area that has developed in recent years. Opportunities within the City► of Tigard qrithin on2 mile of the Triangle area for developing any t � e of hocsin g. etPeciellY multi -familY housing, are e letremely limited except, for multi - family development above the first f1' or in mixed use developments within the Triangle. ' pplicants' assessment of the concurs with Our The Planning Division staff' c ar employment centers. th the , a increased demand for houecin�� opportunities nt Le based not only our discussions with potential developers potential g to _ City ooki,n t area , , but also on discussions with tentisl resident• of the Cit Z live nearby their places of eiployment and with curront residents who are concerned with their. increased commute times. We also have noticed an increase in mixed use develePmests and less strict segregation of land uses in other cities. Primarily because such mixtures of uses can result in decreased traffic and fuel consumption, staff supports teationiof land uses where it is possible for the notes to harmoniously through proper site Planning. Staff also believes that a mistake in the original . Plan designation for particular the Plan Map city -wide exist that this site in articular ae well as mistakes in P p, p y It is dif...lcult to assert / the a�mistake was madaoin 'the P�:ofe ei�na iCommerci.� �l designation of this particular site in 1963 t erause of the a ;rtrnsi aiscussionstim d deliberations regarding this site that occurred not en°u h attention was aid to .� opt the ct was that no Nevertheless, we believe that the mistake P locations throuc h y� that, wage. media here, and nother the need for multiple family reridential opportunities ut lacationc such this that azhi7; Y►ea: ma j or employment centers, near commercial center°, n eaar i maior highwaY _ and public ore.. By locating higher density residentialoPFo rtuniti ee nearem p to me nt /coamercial centers and with res gct to traneportation opportunities, reduced dependence on automobile transportation could have been promoted and some of Tigard's present. traffic .. . co gestio could �,,... le d with pos i'ti... v ei p act s for the entire city. Indteadtb,e current Eel" designates the majority of areas available �l�enew multi ie family residential development far em P �a n commercial center s. The primary areas that are designated for multi-familY houei n g oppportunitiea are at the far ;western and southwestern e g y Y Planning Commission d eai of the city. The Cit � Council and are well aware of the difficulties that have arisen ve n ae thesen areas have ..: REPORT CPA 89 -07 /8C 89 0`l (Criterion Equit STAFF APO ie®) r phGW 8 ea' torpid growth has h recant y arai ',.: ' r .beer ng:. n reaa and. in d® it p�ie'a ' �L ' their tY 1 d cos w ci*1 cen►tsrI ' itie �i noaror a ,, th 1T?i ile, mare /LLr. coln ntar� tha c r�*ral gtgkw*y .217 can hrnlp cor>r5ect tom' a t aiin size ,future traffic coug.etions that riten ci `'re�psai nta� a to t oppv unity . math '' 4L*ily hcuoxi ng 'c ortunii r. sal t i 10, ocoon will reaN neighb�>`hood�,: ouch ai fiche Roli _ than 'de tia ia.�d tranaition.`rs+quirea na cxeful eiti�,� �eleetLon and ;eito plan crud cc np ti bi tLty ' b tii0in houar ' �9, e3etve� or n • R rind th1 tits atub jib' 1o0ationa1 crl:orNu. ' espcial ly ,fit r.epac trainnit' il acceen1. , ia il3,u�atrats➢t hew ttce p104;1'n4ug cotld' site is t ; ides bly ' locats for ar it'3»pie fLmiay. to proximity to eapluyr denrty ' trasneitiow . !.rep high' density reeidoi ti i. adjacent l'ow density re rid4t tit, itECOMI NDTTIOR Based upon the tindingi and conclusions liatea�d . rracaa sonde that the Planting ' Co iriniCsiof ion. approval. of CPA 69-67/SC @° -07+ for the auh jeee Density Residential a lld R-5. Mt vC - • • • • • \• • • • . • • • • ••:.• • • • •` 0 • •••••• • • • . • • e • 1 • • • • • • O • • • • • • • • • • •, • 6 • • a • fa e- -• • 0 • • • • • • •. • • O • •' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -• • • • • • • 'e • •,. • • • • -• • -. -.--•. • • e • • • Ills: Cr • • • • .010. Ise • ,• -•. e: • • • • • • • • • ;11.16.•n• 6... • • .- •__ • • • • "t 1 • s b • 1• -Ct r .nrt lAS SUM • b - '; MEFMORANDt, CITY OF TIGARD, TO: Planting Commission DATE: October 3, 1989 PROMS "Tarry Offer and Deborah Stuart Assistant Planners 508J4CTs Metro Sousing Rule Compliance OREC0 Tba Metropolitan Housing Rule (Oregon Administrative Rule 66C,,Diviaion 7) requires that the average denaity allowed for all developable residential land within the City's original planning area be a mintmum of ten dwa11ig unite Per acre. Two plan amendment 'proposals before you tonight could affect the City 's overall housing opportunity index or allowable density on land3 that ague classified by the Plan as buildable .residential lands. The City • a Plan, as acknowledged by LCDC in 19841, inventoried 1,311 acres of developable residential land in the .. C. nc time Provided fcr r a housing opportunity of 13,1 0 units, Just meeting Metro Po i�an Husin Rule etansard Since that time, ei g ht 23an amendments have been approved which have affected .thaw inventorY. Those redea,'Lgnationa proved% a current inventory of 1,290 acres tld a housing '►pportunity for /3,112 units (10.16 units; per aPre) . The two Pr o Po s ls before the Commission will bays somewhat counter effects on the aaount ri�de3s� The Grose rop sal: CPA 89 -081 acreage and the housing oppc�ctunifir of dcvelo able residential Y; P Po ( /2c 89--08 would reduce the sit ?cunt of developable residential land by approximately 2 acres a :4 the housing opportunity index by 47 uni: ss. The Criterion Equities proposal (CPA 89- 07 /L D developable land by approxibaately ` 5 acres 89-07) would increase the amount of and the City °s housing opportunity index by ,'125 units. The effect of these proposals, singly and jointly, on the developable lands inventory ':and the housing opportunity index Is displayed be10 i. 1. Approval of Gross proposal Developable acres - 1,288 Potential dwelling unite Housing opportunity index 2. Approval Of Criterion Equities Developable acres - 1,2yS' Potential dwelling unit -. 'Housing opportunity index Approval of both proposals 4.4 acres 13,065 units` - 10.14 proposal: 1237' dwelling unite ▪ 10.22 Developable acres - 1,292 acres Potential Dwelling units 13` g 190 g dwelin unite sousing y 10.20 uttits/alcre 9I 1P]Emrtkin.t" loser • • C' TLgand G C:tty Regatdin; • dVtd Gewcu I� negon Zone change $on Ro.LLi.ng Vert Ciaun:eiZ, Ftciend and Wewgkbon6, Nam E4 ate we ate sonny we cowed not bel hene tonight kink pe t6on, .send out du ppofr t .in ava'c o6 *he zone change: Che1nny' Vncve.' %egun 97223 we wowed al"re 4. 6eeL they a wound be. bealiti.6ut we4,e, kept apa>i tme,vt4 . seauz260. .tabs caping and well maintaZted. T%ie be i ede s have o66eted to gave u,6 this6 cvs4u/ ante . «rn. ,e ng . They coot ad be. mon¢ at- tnac.t ue than a A te/ciee 66 &.ice btu.% e ding, and we have no a ctsaui w co_ that an 066.1.4.€ b w.,Lt be 64'1'1t theite Lt cooed be any nu,mben. o6 .c.rne)sz ea . It cowed be a day cote. cen te,t 'with hay' a hand/Led panenat6 corking and go.bij tie a. day at .peak .tna66ic. hoi .& . Lt cooked ,be and Eei4 on Ma a4e Lodge. buiLt trete with !gaily' ncg h tune act mi tL.e, going on. Thene a/ e ,empty o; iced ate oven T c td, Who ` wooed want to buUd 'anatket o 6 6..ce boast ipig to `` stand vacant. Take a wa ` a%aund your n irghboachood and £ooh,, a the ` empty o 6 6.ice s. sioar. tent. Tha & - -We one doomed to have mote (xtt .ic no mattelc whop . 4 bait .there. Ole think it wound be bate o have mote cat6 than 18 wheeeend ,making and psi cWr.- .ing ` rap de im era.ea &nom a bu thie64 on aMehou4 e. Theo a apart den t dale.V..eta arse not at going o be pow i ng ay.t onto 72nd thte.et at 7 :45 A.M. each, morning; they w,i a be corning .and go.ino fiat as You and Y do, at vwt oub hound Ule ,e a you wruZd be beaten o 6 6 with these Nice apa�r tme.n to b`` d you than what we have.: We know what si t i eke, y e J'pound= to be awakened .crz the *lit 6 aomeoR'� .c,na btee,e an d op g g!r 44 .c,n the dump ten, ` on .tip d a hue6 the ri$ght, wow, t tc.ng &on a pickup. 1 etteve me you do-flit" *ini that- We think moot o‘ the ,te,,;idents o6 Ro..Ling i i,t t6 wooed Like. to 4ee th 4 1 nemocn ats Js, ba.;, with sand in. Ouch bhont. ,auppey,, .t can not be. Someone . a Poke- We have enough h .� going to build dam on .thvs Land and we wowed na�then .see Lt be a: beautc.�sae devetopement ,than a -Pig w p ug u9Ry oft 72nd te.t 4 have Acme pnet y 604. a changed negand6 WILYnan�i�tay ,, • ti 1• tu MORTGAGE RANKERS ) to.ber a . 198. 4r. ; Jerry Offer Community Developrnent Department Ci t y of ,Tigard 13125 SW Nall Denlevard Tigar4. Oregon 97223 ANQ KCAL ESTT .rv�yv 1 a' Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment aad '2une� Change from Cosneiroal ;Prof esslelnal (C -P) to Residential R -2r 13265 SW 72nd Avenue Oregon Dear [fir offer yoeL the pant, 28 Years. 1 have been invo tved' in ;:finencin,g a aide asaortmeht or real estate dev.elopmenta throuiheut Portland and the State of oreCon. try background ina:ludes. reviewing Drospe c- tive devellopntent .mites and aasenslr.g proponed pr»elects' financial feasi.billty. This year is anticipate fardfng Fletcher will finance ,ovet 100 million, dollars la real a tate a much of wh'leh is in the Portland area. The Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change repre- sent a vinry positive opportunity for the immediate neighborhood and the community at large. itativ ,. v the frontage suited ariaou to21itseover It The s in quusl u ;s 1s not well e d for C -P' dev' den�:1 -P zone also e�raits a wie a as *ortEert of uses ''aQaeny erpth. The o A l � of which would nc,, be desirable aei` hbors to the adjolning' oaten l to pled: varied types of buildinZc tip to a a,in'ion* of truly 3d f rem the, adjacent residential lots . It is unlikely the prope`r'ty wIll be' developed as a quality offi ®e location. They office build.ngs on the east si& of s 2nd,' • Avenue have not been ass .�ancially a uco esefo,l ae lied' !seen. origine� , ,} nu& t be+ below h • � a. es canta lly en1 „ic,l�►alcd. overall office mar(,te ie are h1 'k» l�dnLa� c Re � onlne the prop,;ea =Cy tc R =2 i accoiep.i everal ttnin�ec.; fishes s 1. The site is the correct : size, shape Sod location or a f iz anciallY successful au1t1- fasi1y develop wcnt. 2. Tigard had vOiry little ' iAtItl fartily land avtnilabie in that area of town and the gone change would respothd to t dt need- Lloyd Center 'rto r. Sdife io5O •C2$ N:E, M dltnanah rt tland, OA 97232 +mane �., i4•444►aw y 44:444441 i N .4 .444' r.. • ki F11X i ► aulti family1 ri;tuh the ,ad, alning single aia' 'devel'np�ent {a ,buffer between the tiaAes a, ►d the ` er'e iammercla . and induatrial uses apd t;biksu''' serve`'` ciiice en,d' .pr. serve the Rolling .Hi'l�is' ne r�hbarho s r+ang1 y, encourage ite: oiprehensive ''Plan .aa�ondi en • 'Wallace E. larding, Cage' res ident ib • us NE I;'GHBORHCOD PLAITN I MG ORGAN1'I ZAT I (N # 5' After a brief introduction' to Tigard • S new police e chief. Ron Goodpas to r. our NPC adjourned to the 'cA. ty, ;hall conference room to`' deal with the 'night'rs agenda. Present were' Chair 'Craig' Hopkins, Orm Doty, Wendy Hawley. Wayne MQ.cKinnon;. a 'Larry Schmidt and 'Sharon Takahashi- Guests this evening were ' Dick Bauer and Martha Bishop the mee ting wa s called to order at 8:00 P.m. and the minutes of h t?`ee previous meeting were approved, as ,!: rni.tted Unfinished business: �`,ane markings on! d confusing 1. The question of the congests.on an 9 the 72nd Avenue overpass has had, attention drawn to .xt and a letter has been sent to the Regional Highway Board. • Durham has also been 2. The peed on Hall f ro�.� Hunziker toy Durha similarly addressed. New` business: 8.' 5DR 89- 22/V69 -2 ? This item was moved up in the syenda to • accomcnodtiate M.r . Baue ▪ a principal in the issue, and Mr Schmidt . Schmidt' s •:4ani tart' Se'rv.1.ce i s seeking to expand and relocate a nonconforming sanitary servic: business. A new t ruck bartz and areas to place recyc 1 i9 bins and contt,a.ine'rs away from Y,.he adjacent residential . property are planned. Fuel tanks are to be removed or decommissioned by Oct. of 1990 and new fencing will be :� dd�d . A second dr ivwayH wi fan b'e adde p p Y bst side- of • house. Th±s p • d to access ro ert on w1 •was din amicable srziution to both solr.. • Bauer and fit. Schmidt. • . al.l• Coverin Mi, �- g ' v SW 3: �unsFtt W m� „� �f 7S� ob ection voiced cha L� 1. I-IOP 88 -3 � Astdford No 2. SDR .App -g t �••. on eal of t:ollir F'iW �� ..- .-► �rha�,� Road. Inf��rmati o nly. Final appeal denied` 4 S - 89- -07. Bristol lMclwiona 1 : propo,aa1. to divide 2.48 acre parce into 13 lots. No ,abjection /.eon as ,t is a1.owable d dove 9-23: t F,.dward`s /Cacti 1e proposal for commerci u se asi a1 5. SLUR 8 *3.tty 8g -23. p rsery business... ,bias 'been is.nd.: ca a construct, on and •nc� 6 4ranted by tne o pli t l aenn 3.nog i . elomnission. . SDR 89- Y 9 . Pac sus t Bud3ngs 21.3 a nd 220 n Qreg on Susi ne s Park ) 1 fio j ctin 7, SDR d=19. Two ` ui ldi= n s in pacFc Corp� rate Center . i t No_ ob >jein. 9 wf `PA $9 -,07'/ cc .1....'... 9 -07 Metzger -Ems /Rockwel 1. Refit est, for a omp place amend,ent and cone change to allow iii apartiaent 0nits an. •72nd A' enc e, .betty rns and 'Fir. The meibersh�ip: 5 on een a of th0 NP�d had no s t r*i is f'ee l �ing the proposal' '00* urged the residents of thei area. to attend 'the inf'orIaatioW' I meeting t3 pm At, to be i' ►elp .. 1'hi 1 . ▪ wi. �1 on Se t 27, a , ?:, - that tit►ce th y .will be able to ask, uestiot s and voice their. • opinions 'on tli� prcjec . n Tti+e' arse roll ,lam c is a duplicatiai asses went of Parcel 323 coa %ectv'i, to fsr�a Noting in Its No. filed an objectlon. • Cic `u�31 Assessment art' �Isax'�- 1.2 Motion by Cancllor Eadm, seconded by Councilor ,c q Ordinance , � • No 89-26 With the carrectiorr- as .noted tY Eng�.x; in 'addition, Item No. 6 of sl e d o di nance sbotfid be letec to �.ct that property chalets filed written ob 7 a ti the motion was a zrov". i d unanilllOtt3 vote of C' ax�ci,. present. A request: for a t"onprehensive Plan atzenclient, . ri.un Meffii, - igi� ' Dea itY (Resiaro de ent rtial 1, t o 2.5 N e uig t ac e) � to e ia 1 CN i aid • •Zon, e a . - ar h OOodf � ) -th25 apP�uatey 1 acres. 'YC0 corner ' irc� , .� tion of sw schols Ferry c�y Road and 135.• th Avenue. d -lr� , 33C h, Tax Iot 100) . a. Public Herring Opened b. Declarations or challenges: Thi applicat __ion is iilitO seek an7•amcindment lir') , e ai Comprehensive change a'5,(13,4creICorninercial Professional ' ' ' - e esidentiar.4 In the 'Comprehensive °Pa "PFC - ' e 11,Pm-Hi enSi and the med. H. ' Plan P°1clei,,is,• o inercia rofessiona . iusp: igh Density (R-25) ,Resicinti., o 'e must meet 11 "sain criterza,. to sugVst ,thai, the liana uses are soneviti at interchangeibetle. We re- ---b—eelielvtc'1);tibirt la ' r "tinge in circumstances has occurred since the original desi tio on the `COmpreifiensiVe an and the remainder of this narrative wilfil serve as 'the. supporting tiling dOCumentatio' ri. The Tigard area is devel.oping es ..,a, hie; quality business renter much like the I.Cr use ' il .. east of the -'t Tr" .,1 e: e .1(Aruse Way Corridor has an added dimension to this business center concept, by providinif a mix of housing tyi5Os so. the public can five cloe', to their employment.. A _similar situation is possible in the Tigard Triangle but there is Ei,,,, ' b°rtage of sites that would be available to develop high q'tifolitY multi-family in •close • ','''' ,' proximity t to the business centers. The site does not have the size ff8elZee *orsite compete' i,, configuration necessary to develop as a business park or ,pre,-,,s,. park ., a6:na viable commercial use. It also appears as tboup.a cominesrcimzstietniitsse. vvonmid:iiii.t.ru,. de.imor,e into the reidential area just 'by the nature of its design requirements. A . multi -family the site more positively. We .have designed for t. m p *ect must meet more strict design requirements anhdisscareeennindleanntd rbruoffpeors'anig at°snuitabie • residentially scaled attractive projec4 that proposes significant screening, setbacks and, buffers from the existing re.sidences. The multi-family market remains extremely strong di in this case, provides Et housing choice that is not available at this time to complement the Tigard Triangle. , , The site is an approximately 5.03 acre relatively flat parcel of land gently'slc)ping.frpitt West to the eastern boundary. The property fronts on a major collector!, SW 12nd Avenue and SW Fir Street. Single-family development abuts the site on, the northern and western _ , project The site is a rectangular shape that goes deeply into resident/1 area a as facilities availab14. matu trees exist along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage owl will remain with the pripo sed boundary. Across SW 72nd to the east is a buiciriine4S ‘4,ni:eloollectiotr:d0,:hf • [ dfr —s ft" • ••• •■• • CONSTSTENC( wiTH COMPFLEIM SI, PLAN POLICY 1.12 IMPLEMENTATION sTR.tiTE.GT: , ... change is consistent with Plan Policies nd ... change in circumstances affecting parcel or neighboritood, or a znistake in original land use designation As will be discussed in great • detail, this request for a change to Itliediu.m-High Density Residential is consistent with all the applicable Plan Policies and locational criteria for Medium-High Density Residential desig;astion. Changes in circumstances have taken place affecting this parcel, neighborhood, metropolitan housing policies and the preference the public has indicated in the past few years to live • closer to their places of employment. As the Tigard 'rriangle area continues to develoi), a, pattern much like the Kruse Way area is resulting, an area of hfgh quality development on major transportation corridors where people can worlcin tat., orrice and business centers and have a choice of quall,ty housing opportunities, mixes of single-family and multi-family; - in elect, a mixed use development on a broader scale. , The subject parcel meets all tile locational criteria outlined in the Comprehensive Plan for a Medium-High Density Residointial Zone designation.. Tievelopment of nearby business centers and the absence of high quality multi-family housing in the imntediate area make this an ideal site to provide housing f()r the continuing development of the business and office parks. Metropolitan housing policies have cauted a change in circumettirIt?,.o8 siince the original adoption of Comprehensive Plans, increasing housing density requirements or communities to approximately 10 units per acre, up from an original mandate of approximately 8 unit.,s per acre. Recent decisions by Metro to limit extending the Urban Growth Boundary changes than circumstances to continue te develop more intensely, These recent polices, Metro wide, along with the continuing demand for multi-family housir4,, and the public's iacreasing desire to live closer to where they work to minimize tommute time and increase leisure time make this an attractive, ideally located tqedium-Higli Density Resident's?! site PLAN POLICY 2.1.1 NEIGITBOPITOOD REVIEW OF PROPOSi.I., For a comprehensive review of our proposal by the neighborhood, we will implement all the strategies outlined in the Plan Policies. We will inform: and meet with the appropriate Neighborhnod Planning Organization up -until the scheduled hearing date. The Plan Amendment process actsures that affectd owners are notified. The City also assists the process in providing meeting areas in City Hall. • • ••' • • • • • • ,• • .1, 1 PLAN POLICY 6.1.1 INCREASED HOUSING OPPORTUNITI]E The policy is satisfied by offering housing 'development to occur, to the greatest extent poseible, on designated buildable lands in areas where public facilities and services can . be readily extended to those lands. All services are available to this site and the proposed design preserves the trees and character along the 72nd Avenue frontage to the maximum extent The proposal would provide for additional multi-family development and would increase the net housing opportunity on buildable lands in the City. The City is obligated through. the MYletrop titan Housing Rule to provide for an equal housing opportuni,.,, mix of single - family and 'mu1tt- family units with an overall development density of 10 units per acre. This redesignation request would further the City's compliance with these reguireinentd;. PLAN POLICIES 6.3.2 AND 6.3.3 COMPATIBILITY WITH LOUVER DENSITY ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL ZONE These policies will be satisfied through strict buffering and screening criteria in the Community Development Code. The density within 100 feet of each property line abutting residential will not exceed 25% over the density shown on. the Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent land. . The increased setbacks, density limitations and height restrictions will mandate a development more compatible with adjacent residential areas than the existing ign Professional. zone designation of Commercial Profes I PLAN POLICY 6.6.1 �� ENING 6.1 BUFFERING AND SCFs� ti 9 This, policy will be satisfied through the Design Rte view process. This proposal will be subject to more stringent buffering and screening requirements than the current te`iowed use of Comraercial' Professional. In general, we also intend to increase the buffer by placing garages against the property line area.;' abutting residential to form a solid secure buffer. PLAN POLICIES 7.1.Z 7.2.1 7.4.4 7.6.1 PUBLIC FACILITY ,;AND SERVICE C ''ABILITIES The Poli'ies are satisfied because adequtite public service capacities are available to serve develor,nent on the property. Sanital;r,r sewer and water is available on SW 72nd Avenue. Site drainage will be directed to nearby storm sewers. A 2/3 street improvement ' on 'Fir Street will be required. Erosion control techniques will be included as *part of the site development plan. PLAN POLIO" 7.8.1_ ADERITACY OF SCHOOL S 'ST m The Tigard School District is being informed proposal. addition to the `� d of this understanding that.. the School �' 1 _s yearly completed. It is our boundaries 8 Durham Elementary S. . , i g p changes to alleviate : ... additional Lcapacity - District is also reviewing proposed chin es to school Dun arses overc *owdnng, in .existing classrooms anr., to provide a � to series Tutu Ter growth. . _P 0 -4m • ICY. 1 SAME 'A WAY IM]PR .3 '2'R.( EFFIG �.tWIENT'� TR.EET ;: 'YSTEIVf.. ANA r.i�+ ► • c�e�elo ed ana�or co _� �. ..t,,,,.,�,en directly a ■lai SW 72na,A P s 'venue: a yva.e � r� s� �.�..,�. - - -- .. dicat�dd along S'�V nd "Aven�ie a Street right of way will be dedic v��ill construct a 2/3 s on 'developinent, so that traffic neighborhoods. Tri -Met service. is lectors re, .. reet improvement` on SV�i T.ir Street to serve as from our developments 'will riot pass tl routt available abutting the site at SW .72nd' Avenue LAN ]Pf�LICY 82.2 LOCATING INTENSIVE LAND PUBLIC ''RANSIT ,it. EA' _ER! =e Gcess to existing is Policy. is pacisf ed because Tri-Met offers bus ,service on `S'W 72nd venue less than intensive' 1 P The proposed; redesignatiof would locate a: qusrt,�r mite fram the properties.. oF' ment .on an existing public transit route to maximize use. °' of development , i, 1.1. L TION,A CRITER: PLAN . ,t OIC'Y 12. 'SIDIaTIAL P t. bi' DEaLGN�i TIQ T is in complete agreement with the outlined locationa The proposal P High Density Residential use• screening requirements of ' the Community buffering , and g 4 1. Density transi�.,(o�, 1�uf# g Development Code will assure t hat the development will be compatible with adja ent residences. 2. T he P r proposed. development plan riax nlizes the p ri vac y of the exiIf, in g residential en cis t o r ei • criteria for $editun The subject parcel fronts on and has direst access to SW 72nd venue, a major collector street. The subject site is relatively flat, with sparse tree cover, and is fully serviced; so no development limitations exist. i Tri Met service is available on 72nd so public transit is available within �. miler • s located across SW' 72nd from the site: Col venience retail service A business center i � ot�tunities will one quarter is also i pa increased housing opp available nearby Also relevant �s, the part ncre play in the development of the Tigard Triangle, an area that will provide a Mix of uses; e y en , ih housing h like the Kruse Way is centers entn.� subject si�� much with complete 8 eruglo,� t � � Corridor is developing to the east of the j ,L v itS will provide j wn open space and recreational ,facilities. ` The proposed development It 1 1 :coMPttANCE WITH APPLICABI ' L ELI GOAL 1 - CITIZETT IlNIVOLVEIVIENT This application ftiliovvs the Plan Amendment process and tbe subsequent procedures required to insure the general public may become iwoIved rn the p ariting procesct neighborhood meetings Will be held to present our proposal to the . , • immediate, area. GOAL 2 LAND.; USE PLANNING Ej fcallOvvirigthe,designated procesi:and,by,providirig a ,,factuallOasis,o.suppor'i; said change, : this 'amendment conforms to'Said. goal. GOAL AGRICULTURAL GOAT, Not 'applicable. GOAL 4 - FOREST. LANDS Not applicable. • , • 1.1 , I GOAL - OPEN SPACE SCENIC AND HISTORIVAL AREAS Ar_LINAIVRAL RESouieggs Not applicable, except fL)r 'apen space requirements of the Medit.imalligh Density (31-25) Resideri.tial Zou. GCIAL 6 - AND LAN I) Tile development vwould conform t� all eriAronmental quality statute, rules and standards. GOAL 7 - AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAI, DISASTEItS AND 11,AZAIMS Not applicable. GOAL 8 - RECREATIONAL ITEEDS Not applicable. 0()AL 9 - EC.S21q0IVIY OF STATE The subject projettt will provide jobs and services to residents of the St.,ate. I:)ev.elopment the site will have a positive influence on the to= base. • A ft l�4 vii e proposed use would ria Greater ecier ey is achieved Uy pining increased intensr transportation corridors. A"1::, .14 .- URBANYZATIO The site is within the Urban Growth Boundary. l =.0 1. 10.0 %S5 . `Nq• 201,34". Jo i000 140 It 581'24 IN 250.32 190:32 • 3501 5502. i7 Ac .97Acr 2T21 5T3 - N. 5s'_ rr MO o. e C 4 100 A �2 i 1. l; .90A �rchtect *. ire 5.vii ' s Fen/ gd uktio on sisaa�, ii toe E Im SUec 11, V im . WA9010Cam! i 2! C Ir i *ay 1305 IG land. WA Siltn3 As we discussed on the telephone earlier`this mnorain neighbors in the Robing Ribs subdM ision ere harm concerning the a bovs referenced ComPrehels, we'P Change, In anew of these discussions and the yin -going Criterion Equities to arrive at a - utually satisfacto request that the Oublic hearin g scheduLed for klo n be set over for a twr week pe''uod. O 'ark hi pefui rFs a il! be successful in satisfying the neighbors cor r Siro.�e a I ,� • CN E IVES CRITERION Mark P. Rockwell Pe,Irtner IT by the neig • ors .ar conclusion, •we respe�ctfu i ,Oc►tobe�r 23rd ,at 7 at diiyen . the additional tim. rns.. • .rt cQMkiEfiCLAL R L ESTA7E!INVFSTME • An open letter of commitment to the neighbors in l2ofling - lil'ls c�'Airst, we want to express our, to those of you who participated �' � h'last Wednesday's rneetir,u. We apprecote your inpt't and we`re working, to incorporate '3rious racumrnendation9., The upcoming heer, ing is limited to the pra,aposed Co►npreh(r give ,Plan Amendment ands:2,one Change from the'ex3lrtin;g designation cif C-P to the Proposed R-25. H,owevero we want to giva irou our personal 9asurence that if the comprehensive, plan amendMent and zone, change are meoe,. we are committed to developing, and mEintaining a residential property, of very high quality design and materi :.pis.. As our basis for that ^ aa commitment. we have included copies of the site plan. elevations, . floorplans developed by Otak units Wit The proposed project ',rill: include Large one and two bedroon' unit an estimated overage, rent of $625, per month. ,Examples of the planned quality include: fireplaces in Most units, individual washers and dryers, , garages w;th automatic garage door openers. units with air- cundit oning, bevelled siding, and traditional roof design to be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Our plan includes maintaining the large trees existing along S VJ, 72nd Avenue and the north side of the property. It also includel3 abundant landscaping throughout with particular attention provided( to Landscaped berms and shrubbery t. iat will serve as buf feat to the adjoining homes. If you have any questions. please feel free to ca0I me at my office f6B4 -456 I) or home (539- 1633). I<Vark Rockwell Partner COMMERCIAL REAL ESTAYV INVESTM NT LEGIBILITY STRIP 254° SUMMARY UNIT - TYPE. NO. SO.. FT. 1BR_ _1EA. 44 750 2BR 2BA 1030 2BE1 -2BA 22 1095 TOTAL UNITS 110 TOVAL, PARKING 19€3 SPACES 25 20 tae.: AN OPEN LETTER OF COMMITMENT FROM CRITERION EQUITIES TO THE NEIGHBORS ` IN ROLLING HILLS LEGIBILITY STRIP MINN ' Amingir .""'"'"P.i - _ •J. AMINININEV i i, 11 FlJuuwin; A 1A,sti �.,:�.," e� .ry a Witte I, a.4siIItit'i Yi' L .t NN1 =- OPINIONIIIIIr l• �. ' ®: .. P- L_ .1101- .111111111 f IS= . 1�oten wow. mum T BUILDING TYPE I SIDE ELEVATION WOK CRITERION E UITIES TO THE NEIGHBORS IN- RO LING i-II r•• - r ..141.?„ BUILDING TYPE I. 3IDE ELEVATION yam maw —t-w5-.211311.11.1701 ICI—iiiii'17-0411%- Avis Inv • aunt CI 1 JR; asemoylelliNg .. -.411. WPM* Nig ...Ea I if112-1.-2ILI;46' .• Br ,-,Fe iiiii.: - -n ,._ risi .03113021.1e6,15t, ... • , OF CAM Wj tiA-.$00( REV TO. DATE August 126 0 1989 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CPA 89 -07 CC 89 -07 P TIGER- ISMS /ROCKWELL A request for approval ,of a • Gomprehe naive Plan AAralendment from (Commercial ' Profee iona1) to Medium-High Denaity resinlential and a Zone Change, from C-P (Commercial Professional) to lit -25 (Raeidential,, 25 units/acrd.., ZONE: C -P (Commercial Professional) LOCATION :: iL t side of SW 72nd Avenue between SCE Verne Street and SW Fir Street ( WG1'M 251 D8, tax lots '80C & 801, 251 1DiC, tax �. lot 3600 ) Attached pp y review. From • ed 3e the Site Plan and �a � g.ioant � S tatem®nt for ouwv information supplied from other PP ed ' by various d®partmentn and agencies and fra� information available to our staff, a report and recommendat,`on wAli L prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the mar future. if you soiah to comment on this application, tie need your comments by 1. 8, 1989. You may use the sgaco provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If . vqe_ a unable te scesipond by the abPve date please . phone the staff contact noted below sdth your romgnent.i and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning ' Department, PO fox 2339 7, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639- 4171. STIFF CONTACT: Jerry Of fer .. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING TTENS TEAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to fit.. Please contact leawo�n of our office. Please refer to the ®ncly aed letter. ( e 5e e written comments= r1 cc_a,.,„ 7,kt r saute hArtitav fj -1/te '01Pe 15(44 cl Vt. osp !r , S CP -t, C '` YGice ces cod/ .. e etveq , 'Lve.7 G . Name of Pero n coMment : phone Number: '' bkm /OP1189 o7 . BI 1 MYPIi��6� 1110 IY ,j)'111 V yi MORTGAGE BANKERS ' `AND REAi, STATE CONSULTANTS. Mr, Jerry Offer Community Oevelopment Department City of Tigard 13125 SW - Ha;t,1 Boulevard Tigakd, Oregon 97223 RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment: and Zone Change from Coinmercial Professional (C -P) to Residential R -25`' 13%05 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon Bar Mr Offer: For the pact 28 Years, I have been involved An financing _a wide assortment of real estate developments thrbughout Portland and the State of Oregon. My background includes reviewing prospec- tive development sites and assertsing proposed projects ° financial feasibility. This year we anticipate Harding Fletcher will finance over 100 million dollars in real estate, much of which is in the Portland area. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change repre- sent a very positive opportunity for the immediate neighborhood and the community at large. The site in question In not well suited for C-P development, it has relatively little frontage in comparison to, its overall depth. The C-P zone also Permits a wide assortment of uses (many of which would not be desirable neighbors tot the adjoining homes) t . m of only 1.'O to place varied types of buildings up to a minimum from the adjacent residential lots. It is unlikely the property Will be developed as a quality offi,te location. The office buildings' en the east side of SW '?'tnd Avenue as financially setccessful as had been'„ originally anticipated. Rental rates coa tinue to be belot ' the overall office market, and vaca■cies are high, Re- zoning the property y to R 25 accomplisues several things: 1 The site is the correct size, shape and location for a l financ ially suctcssfui mu1t3 -fsn3y d evel.. opment... . Tigard has very little multi-family land available in that area of town and the zone change would rasp and to that nead . Lloyd Center lbWer • 5iilte'1t 50.825 11,5, t ulte ornate B rtiand, OR 97232 • Phone 5O3) 235 -325 PAX (55O 239.75111 `'' Iv EPPikla MORTCA►.tc BANK8R5' ASSOGIAT1CSN 1 F AMERIcA ®,f!fer. c'tober '3,, 1989 ]P age A . multi- faesigy resicdent.�al pr ®sect u. �:� ncre oampatible with tire adjoining s ngle 'amily devre`lopment I't :would act as a buffer between the homes and the more 'intense commercial and industrial eases and thus serve to rein- force and preserve the Rolling 'Hills neigbthbshood: I strongly ' encourage the City mf ,Tigard t;Iii, -adopt ',the' propose Conparehensive Plan arrendmer t and Zone Change. from C -�; tc ]R -25. ours ''very truly Wallace E. Hasd1ng, 0M8R' President C,ty fta2 �yyy i 0401 'OOP. Qri�a!t`.d, iJr4�a�% Regand.Lng: Zone chai/ige Ro.e40 F/u.end and Newg h�ra , w aye �o�en we H co4d,, not be .'hehe 'tonight we woad £4Jze o &nd oWL uppo/v ;i n a4,o o � ,the zone change. We :theb e wand £c beu 6u tvq„ei hep ape mea . eaut 6,0.4 2and6aapcng and wed maLotc2ned,' The bu Zdetcb hale of ') ed to g.Lve U.6 .this .a66uitance The � wowed be monce ca cae .c ve Shan a te.'40, a a r'e 6%i�;ed Ong, and y; wae. n y h a�vume bnen o aa a � . b ubn w,anLene eb that . an a 6 gee buUcUng tbene. cau.d 7t cau&d day cake center, w h aa hwtdfced be artev 6 cotm g avid going . w.ice a day : cowed be and L(us on Moo a Lodge 'bui4t thehe tt th rnar�y night t me actLv.L Leis goLn.g yon .Lce There ant empty o is4.ce4 a. av� T.Lgand, Who wau, d wait to bc+uid ,anathet�. ,o is bu,iu d ng 'to Ata.nd !Vacant.' a t'a around yawn nesghba /hood,,tied £Ook at the 'empttj a 6 6J,JLe6 ban tot. a e. doomed to have mate ra44-%c, no ma ,ten what -L6 b 'tG e e.�ch_ We think t wowed be. be .ten to have mane cam n 18 wheete s , g pick- ing e a afl tmevt dive-tee/us ,ing up d¢.e.& e1r..LeA► 6&OM a btaine.6b ot, wanehaw s e. p ach �Lng, ate not a going to be paw ig out onto 72nd d�e.e at 7:45 A.M. e n�u,cn they wite be ca'rn.i ng and going jw t ab you and x do,, at vale au4 hauna. • bth.itxd au. thaw who. We. Deg,;: you wail-Ed be be to 066 with theae vM,a.ce ;apart men s y w, have. We (an�ow wh:a -t .c t £2fz :.to be, awakened in the .nLght by 6omeane ,pound= e tge2 an dnapping g. %n the dumpbten, OIL tutcfi8 .cde,c,vtg ha 6 the rug urai, >Lng ,pan a. pickup. Believe me yo. don't want that. hcnz mast o6 the i. e sid:n 3 o.6 Rotting H , L6 uouZd 1,1.ie to 4 ee tha'4 land twain az i6, but with in 4ko/tt bu pp y, can not be Someone ,vs going to bu t eel .t ameth Lng on .mss £and and we wout.d nathen 6 eee Lt be a. be.auti6a. de. ve opeme f „than a pig in a poke.. we have enaug l ugty on. 72nd, .P.e,' h4ave Some pjtexty 60 a change. �er'y; user._ )mmun.ity Development i eiartmen : y of Tiga :card, ;OR 97223 Proposes Conrpre iensive' Plan tttr4ndrL ent an : t ', lgts t;ion o f 2 sl , 1'DC, tai Dear r p Offer: , �►'ctobe Sine ` 7 , ;am , nxb1e to atte�cnd the public hearing on Tuesdayr rd , 1 - a'lu writing you this letter si■ ; As a property owner on s'i; uth west ,,lia.rifis street, ' 1 TAa nt to express' my strong. 'su tr,,, proposed comprehensive plan amendment and :zone change. As you are aware, ' in addition to the large erplo5mp nt t►as�e ' '�al.�read.` located in this area., Tigard h,as plans that call for. developing thousands of ' `new , 7 obs Within the Tigard Triangle as Well as a lar e number for the southern' e snd of S o � a 1 2 ild � Howe v �o � y k��Wl.ed e, .there are no prov isions '.in,' to p rovide for, �n new �uiti=f amily houSi g within. the triangle End . t h E e is ver y , little , ntor of multi- family land in t true `east portions �r.ve � y of he east a and 1 r�� of 51ig; ard, and that is particularly true of land designated .)R-2 'The " ro p o$,P d change is. a step in the right direction o It's ''a" mis -' p take to plan for ' thousands . of newer jobs' arc not accommodate the .o ..,. ■ vious need for 'additio ial multi,- f�...�ily housing. sincerel: , or`tIa Oregon 97223 -8 57 ''' ' 1 4 fait: (503)684-0 87 AnamemprpmammommmEmm PROFESSIONALS 100, INC., REALTORS® Mr. Jerry Offer Community Development Department City of Tigard Tigard, G;ceg'on 97223 RE: Proposed Comprehensive .Ian Ammendment and Zone Change for 13265 S.W. 72nd. Avenue; 251 1DB, tax lots 800 & 801, a portion of 2S1 1DC, tax lot 3600) Dear Mr. Offer: Based on my experience in marketing the property, there are several reasons why I recommend approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Ammendment First, the site is not large enough to accomcaodate C -p site is disproportionately dee nd quality. Second, the pro ject�:`3 of substantial scope and P in relationship to its width and frontage on S.W. 72nd. This eliminates most C -P developments as greater width and visibility are nearly always important requirements. These limitations result in two small sites. One on the front that is 2 -2.5 acres, and the balance of the property in the back making up a second "landlocked" site of a similar size. If Lhe current zoning is maintained, I fully expect the property o have had i��I iterest from various individuals to purchase t will be divided into two parcels as we 'front Portion to build a small office or commercial building. That leaves the "landlocked" back half of the property undeveloped and with relatively little value. Given these circumstances, I would not anticipate that the development on the property will be of high quality, particularly on the back half. However, if the Comprehensive Plan amendment and zone change are made, the opposite is true. The size, shape, and location of the property are excellent for accommodating a high qual *y mul, - famiy' eeP ; n. t. Purthc rnnre, the change would hel multi ad a �s� significant imbalance in available land. At present there is a large supply of undeveloped C -P land 'yet there is rio R-25 land available in or near the '"Tigard Triangle. Sinoere1y, ohn Decosta Lake Oswego Branch • ``Kruse Woods One 5285 "SeW Mad �ws Rd., Suite 161 t swego." 503 s- ti. ik er c H Grp ��ry�yyY tltl 99 ®®oe N ■ �y��y- !p� I�Iy��i [J /I111 //�� tem Or Propose Comprehsasive ..Plan Amen c mment 13265. S V 12nd.... Avenue. 2S1 1 DBr, (tax tion of 2S1 1D C„ 'tax lot " 6OO ) Since I am una?' i I attend 3rd, ;1 am writing 3/01 this west "Vargas street, I , star t proposed co npr ehena�•;ive plan the tbl %ear .0 `ova ueS, ay; letter. .., Asa !; propert11' owner a to express.: my strong support: amendment and 'zone "Change, Are you are aware, In addition to the large eMpIoYment base a1re� located 4.x1 thiS area, Tigard has pans that ;call for , .develop i thousands of new jobs within the TigArd Triangle, as well 'as large number for the southern :�nd c f SW0 72nd. However, to ml's knowledge, there are no provisions in "place to 'provide for n ' newt multi- family housing w ; th n the triartgle aria there, is viwry , little inventory of multi- family land in the east and northeast portions r, Tigard ,� rl 'trier of lead . �les��g�aatec� ,�--26 � , ; of Y� arr� any that is particularly �" P The proposed Change" is a step in the right diree:tio take h plan for thousands of new jobs and not acdot+ loda vious need for additional multi-family hoUsing. Sincerely, II i OO ONE MAIN P'L AC 01,SOUTHWESIr 1, N $TREI PORTLAND, onEdoN 9721 503.. :223 b 1 An open letter o commitment to the neighbors in Rolling Hills' Dear Hom©owr`vorse First, wa went to express JUT' thank to those of lee who participated in last Wednesday's meeting. We appreciate your input and we're wcrking, to incorporate various recommendations. The upcoming 'hearing is limited to the proposed Ctrn; , ahensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change,: from the existing designatioln of C-P to the proposed R -25. However. we want to give yUu our personal assurance that if the compretaensive plan amendment and zone charge era made. we are committed to developing and Maintaining a reittitiontial ''property of very high quality design and materials. As our basis for that commitment. we have included copies of the site plan, elevations, and fioorplans developed; by Otak Architects. P.C. The proposed project will include large one and two bedroom units witty an estitrnated average rent of $525 per month. EXsmples of the planned quality include: fireplaces in most units, individua` washers and dryers' gara`ss with automatic garage door openers. units with air-conditioning, bevelled siding, and trad tknnal roof design to be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Our plan includes maintaining tho large trees existing aiong9.Wo 72nd Avenue and the north side of the property. It also includes ebundant u p attention provided to landscaped landscaping throughout with articular att enti berms and sx'irubbery that will serve as,,but'aers to the adjoining homes. If you have any questions. feel free to call me at my o, ff ice (684 -4501) or. home (639- 16333. Mark RockWell Partner MPR:km COMMERCIAL SEAL .s rArE!Nvv r`1 254 • • • SUMMARY UNIT TYPE NO. so. Fr. A 1BR IBA 44 750 13 2BR 28A 44 1030 C 2BR 2BA 22 1095 TOTAL UNITS- 110 TOTAL PARKING 196 SPACES S.W FIR REE Th 6 as 80 ids AN OPEN LETTER OF COMMITMENT FROM CRITERION EQtJITIES TO THE NEIGHBORS IN ROLLING HILLS SEPTEMI3ER. 29. 1989 srcrittects r. Law4.4:-..., 2.10731 'NM ••• IMMO 724.•-ri, _ Ca...a as. • . go.a. .14 WAD 'PS 11.-: our - • . LEGIBLiTY STRIP r t 77. e 4 • • • • ": _ Mont ' ' AINIIIII ? 9 _ All1111.101111111111111116.,..,- - iistillm MEM • : - 11111116 -i'11.1■11111/117111.1.111111211'',.._,. , _:....______ ___,Nonsima.7.1.* alowes, miiiiiiiiil ' i■i411111•11:11 -,12....=■4111.11111111Mt - Will Vonommigt -111-;-.111111110 .. 1 " • If ' k. —... !lir - Itmlitri vnittril Unlit, i tit I a tintio,..4.....„.....7.0me..-:"..- -*-11.111w=1....,: 6.0....ttitriii. ...F. „.„..,,.. _•_ ...,„ ,.._ ... t_inw,..,..lantil 1 tr I luirlOttON-rilsollie.., - '-' - 11. Ja- -1't ' , . , ‘ ... -q111.41: MUM - ,--freiti ,.. ,.:4.. -...E,,, ,,,.,••' • 7..."1.11111111sor . ... 44- -3 •", - laii LL1 11111112...pignaim. ...„,,,..0; ,..■...7.............;.."": '.....-- "111 11 HIP "'VIM°. t , it Zlial. • _ Wire a. iiiiIrs:'• - Iii..0, ,-. . ri ,..: ._ .,..............., ................,, ,--....,... , _ .. .r. ........" 0, .......,......,,,...._ anlitram•--_,.; .....11; ow - ItIllitisSmAilli ' P VAIMInglil+. 6 let istomma or 77-;...- `,"7-. . ... . —. . , • -'''-'''... 4litsamostatet BUILDING TYPE 1 SIDE ELEVATION ....ii......,t-_,...1„,- 1 4 a.. '-'11- -,_,.... ..... ..._ 4, ... 1. 101.71 Eamismapprip„ tie . ,...... --sainif It • 1....:1 . a 5:-.:*,..i. ■F J II .!ink tammr- -1,- t, •to. ii ii"-":4!- Ph.-• Sat :"--- ' 111Hri •-----1,- , k ----) Are .e • mat EgiMiergiir IftimirsoillitA 1 ri.,-111/14. Vil *16/1.1==tr"-sts. r itglraz.4174Ti..... ,,, /:. ag 1121r." I" 11* /44111411,1 n I mil'', 1-11-11° Isla.,:;i:45- 1.1,. or MP it, . ..i......-- , . Iff. 037:47 1. --.....,.' ,_ ii=_-• =MEMO - ,..j r -.,■, Nil . * 1 ."."'"............."..11,- , .€,,,,.._ .„'" •■••••■,--*•■•••■•±0,,......' . • .., ,, • r- . . 54/14a3 talatitiliatr=sra i ! ril ,11. . • 11.1`....11., - ...:. -NW ta .. - -. -; .,. . - .- • t -"Z"---1,== saillialalt --= datill lip. . -,--- . '"ai.,r, ,....• raira,Thlumw---r-- a NM Wr . ". ;Illsom eif,r.ssrumit,. i_ au: gi=_ maw 11 1ft_ a-74/.* liniffill - _ IN Pafillariiiki=iiil: 7:: , MOM r -A. rs •_...r !nu OM iistiugimmoi.r, ...rose an ammo* ' 111 limmullEgla: Ng= =imp., 7 immat as Mailliall -I. 1111•11.11111ff !MET; ■I In PINIMIF IR INOWIIIWIllr , . SI g IWILWT.- w, 1WIMMIWNWF • t..I.,,,...-..---, ,-...-r-77, t BUILDING TYPE I, II SIDE ELEVATION MN "" .auppour -zammanei ■aosi somi age a..r.: ...J.., v i ,` 4 =_' Iii i ■i 1 .i2a.. .1..' . ". . ..1.. . sM-wr1-- 1Oa1arMW n„: t - 1"11 ai lir 7e P111 , . - r"ffom`g...iU wola lL , a• f` IiiWhi. 119mO- 3.1.a1.1. .. 4-11.• . 1-1 r1- 1i 3 o. i..,'... 1 I imi , I N .• ,„ . I t4 6 I la .' t t11 t. (4; i. I a!' rP.- .. . C7. . :.:.1.. t 2ii ."iit . a I - e 1 f- r 1.P.'. ..l.. . . - EfI . ifu- l it m „„ , tlt il st *Ikt-ianscask allit atoa..-.-art. a...a do„:_ :,- . _,,-4.7"."11.111M1411111.i.--7...... \ •... _ , 1 --.......... , „ .,, . .1 ........... a' irgirXt„ ,letvinling4==-''” " • .. • ,_ , a -.Er ,. , ..imor - . - AM= , G tr ,...........,...... gi...... wma.,, Mini , . INIMM.1.1.1.. ' 111,.....det. iMeli .. 1 =Mr 11 1 . ' * ,' ' le I: 1 ValiatiMigett -11=7.= lit= :' rittirlaw:.....itasimi" ---111111111t i., air: eil ! . ai. Si". .17- , aami=ii , I 4.--.. vormati ', . lull, ii ' Via_ M _ , sm. i ....V.—......■••+----.. .......-- .-..- • ____ pitai, .., Mill11111 amt.= _ sc.. • ,... -w.t....... UMW ill ,f , aiiiiinilt =LIM • .._ ......... .02■..... BJLDNC TYPE FRONT . cow al1617A10.1p,..M.,:,- • A brief re>rr.dr,w concerning 'the{` neaig 4Dor Weinesdagr evening , '. Sei tember` Lewis School Attached `:is, a photocopy of tie 1 et h'bs to the app;oxa,matel y 30 re ei g also provided Craig. Hapk, ._ri a, letter to read at this eveti n+ meeting ► 4 u ,1 mom •.o-wei11111MIC AM September 20, 1989 max homeowner 1®00 ONE MAIN RACE" UTI1W ST'MA1N.STREET, R'TLAND., OREGON, 97204. Sod',223' 1334 You are; invited to attend a neighborb,00d meeting nett Wednesday evening, September, 27th at 7 :30 p.m. in the Phil Lewis School. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the residential project that is proposed for the Metzger property that fronts on S.W. 72nd Avenue ar.d the app1icacioni',for chancslpg, the property' s zoning from oft.ace /°commercial to . resf6dentia1. use. During the meeting, the project architectv contractor; and Criterion Equitiec e.g he developer wily ala be.. present to discuss the proposed plans and respond to questions or may Jerry the City of that ' you ma have. _ concerns Derr Offer from t. unity Development , . . m lso be Tigard ..,o�nn► Department r�a�.11 a available to talk about th . zone change and answer question We sincerely hope you'll attend. However, if for some reason you're unable to participate but you have an ,j k questions ions or concerns; please give me a call eithe` at the office or at home. We would be happy meet with time that's more c for . .. you y e � '... ' PPonvenie ot. �.•nd�.vidual�. �.t a convenient ' : you. HHy office telephone is 684-4501 and my home is 639- 1633: Sincerely, Mark Rockwell Prtner MPR:km COMMERCIAL RL'i4L L ST AIE:I 1 V ESTil E' O �1. ,. rY M - • DATE 4/ FROM Tigard' Planning De man &IPA, 89 -07 /CC 89 -07 , NSTZGER-8148/ROCKS LT. Ail egue.ent for ` approval o a Comprehensive Plain Amendme Density residential and a to RR -5 (Residential," .Professional) LOCATION: Street " and SW Fir Street nt. $..'r,oar ( uerc,ris.al Professional) to Nediet-Itigh Bone' Change ;f :os t ' C -P (Commerci. a " Prafessaoaal 25 units/ace, 20118: C-P (Cos° err al West side of 8W ;72nd Avenue, betw.'+n ' SW " Verne (WCTN 281 108, t lots 800 4 " 801, , 281 1Do, tax Attach, is the 'Site Flan and applicant' o , ntetesnant l nor your review., Frosrs information supplied departments and agencies " and" frost, ,be infornat$on available , o our Staff, a. report send recoa ens ati0n wL preepareeed ,end a decision will b rendered 'on r the proposal in they near ;future. wisek+ to cosass it on this appliesation ee i your cw a fi! - A• 598 ,You way uew , the provided b&.Ow ' or ottach se Grate lot er to you - a n _ le eepo d by t g ahoy date ' pl�aase return youer cosn�aer�t ®. �€ 1��.�'_- �- �----- ---- -� � —_�_._ phone the staff contact Opted blow with your cos d ente confirsa your cosnmyente in weptingl ant soOn an : possible. If you have y 's eetioa regarding thin. east er ;aontnct the. "cigard Plntrnin; Department, PO lox 2339`7, ,13125 SW Hall Divd., igard, Z && 639 -4171 �a OR 97223. PR4 STAFF CC.MTACT o PL1ASB CK THE FOLLOWING XTfl($ THAT PIPPLYI nd : 'eve no ob ectio ► to it 0. We have reviewed the proposal � Pisses: oontact a t Our office.'. Please refer to the oncloeead letters Written Caearnentax .,,: (Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number bkrn /C1A89 -87 . am in n 4 A ssto to che"n ®tha zoning"" of >a lira . � • i' of ,S.W � request 9 ,p3 . � pescsrl on the wa+e�a�t �'ei�e " • 72nd. Ave. between S. • 'Varns Street anal 5.W'. Fir Street from Y I I 1 in`es The n& t a frosts to ;a.W.1 72nd Ave.; ar siasor o��, . and''tA a , local unimproved street:. Develogax: t of the oito a ill rc uire widening,' e. S.W. 72nd Ave. right -of -Way: to an a dit o ial 1® ft. the S.W. Fir St aret right-of-way should ba �ipro ed 'with' .2/31 street ii prov nte: or he: jl ::fit. vacated. ▪ Thee proposed song change 1,e expected to reduce • potential traf fc generated by the 'developed site from apout 1400 to 790 vehicles Per day. e {' � 72�id Aver.' 3. storms an�'i ®anni, sewer' are availabl. �i�l►, • . try Recommendation: dation: e�rin.:. Division had no ob. octiona , to the proposed . Goianprebeneite ,plan The Engineering � 'amendment. ENGINEER' cO? ENTS - SPA S9 -070Z0 8 Wipe LANDMAR v • V, • • N: Tigard arming D®pa lj CPA 88- 07I,CC 89 -97 1 TZOBIt -BMS/A .ELL 11' regcaeet fox approval • Cs aprehenaive ,Plan Aa ndspont frree ; (Co+a tercial " Prcife ®teional ), o Medium Hlc b' • Density retgidential and a Loma -,Chat 40: frc taa, C -P ' (Cca nercia��. ,: ro agaional);,'`: to. �c -25° (Residential, 25 unitis` \acre) a . Profeeaionaltr LOCA s es a i' TIN, Y W t ids of SW 2nd T�v�enus ;batareen° W V" ' e Street and SW Fir Street (WCTM 213l ':1198; tax loth 800 lot 3690) littached i� the Site 'Plan andl applicant's statement, for ; your rovitaw. Pry, ,information supplied by vim: clue de-ra**Mente and +aginaiee and frog':. other } information availebie to oux; staff, a report end recom�rAendat on ' w .11' .die" pscepared and will be rendered on its proposal' is the near ° future: If yeu wish • to coninent on this appliaatian, to iiiibd r ; , 19f9. You may pro ",den below or , attachi a separates- letter . tea return our coamaente. if you ; aepo„_nd by the .above date 1p1 ' e ' pn¢�ne the 'staff blow, 'with >> .your !: csitdoiinBnte and con f ir►6 yo>< ' coement® in writing ass noon a poaeible. Tf you °3 ave an quastio ,e reiq rti!ii g''; thiiei matter, contact tie Tigard P aura .ng !'9epartment, Po Boac' 23397, 31' 5 S : M. Hall Blvd. Tigard; OR '97223. PH01E: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Af a „ PLEASE CI BCI: THEE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY s We have reviewed the proposal and haveino objections to it. P1 ®Ace contact o f our offioe Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments s Name of Person connnenting: Phone Number: W' bk 1 /CPA89 -07 . BKMI' .� .0 ..., ..e 41,A.0019 1 4 +e! a': : CPA 89,07/PC". 99'4)7 F4ETzGP41-EPIS/ROCattlE,PI. , A requ.st 1for approval of, ,'a, 0:kaprehenteive Plan Amendment''from',;(e.ammercial.•liraleseional;,;to. ktediu,m4ligh , . - P A , , , . „ ., , , , • , . ' - i ' . , ° ' Denei.ty, raeidtnti,al and a Zone Chaylge trait C-P (Monomial Profeisionel), to R-25 'r(Residenizial, 25 unitsiacrey. , • Mfrs , , C-P (Commercial . , „ P,rofeesional) 1/1111CATICitis rieest side of SW .ftvenuo,, between 611 Varna Street and SW rir ;Street (WCTI4 2511 1D11,. tout lots 800 fi 801, *251 1DC, tax • . , ••, lot 3600) , ,, , .• , . , „ , , „ ,, , , , Attached La the .191.te Plan and alit' O statement , for your ripview. Prom infomation supplied by various departMents and agencies and from other • information ava-Lable to our staff, A report and Tecommendat,i,en witi be prepared and a decision will be remiered n the proposal in the near futUre. If you wish to cement on this application,. ma mood your cemossto by 1969. you may use the ',Pace provided below or attach a separate letter " return your cements. ab e to pa' d • • d ts please phone the staff contact noted below with our cements and confirm your comment., in tl-Til,T.Lng as :Joon as possible. If "TOM ha0e any volution* regardtng this clatter, conZlact he Tigard Planning Department, P0 Box 23397, 1312S 8W !fall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. , PRONZ: 639-4171. We have revi.ewritithe proposal and have no objections . to it .111.1111.1■101 Im • MIMS D! is u'ar*:�iat FROM: Ti and Pla7,mi,ng Department y M i NCTZGER -BRIMS ROCKWELL 4 request for,: 'approve.i CPA � 89,,-07/CC a . of a. dent from Ce rcia1 Profeeeion%l).. 8� 0 �' � cnmpre�.ens ire P3.an n ( to Medium- High Dernsity, ; rosident,ial , and a Zone Cha ge .frz ', C -P (Couinerc,i31 Profen iona1), • to A =25 (Residential, • .25 'units /acre) . ZONE: c--F (Co anercial Profoottianal) LOCATION,: West , , of SW, 72nd' Ave:W.3, betweest 8W' Varies Strest and SW `gir Street (WCTM 2S1 MOB, tax lots 800 '& 801., 281 1DC, tax lot 3600) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant '9 'statement for r y our roview. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation Will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal. in the near future. If you +firth tc, comment on this applicatioril, we ;reed , yaur . ca o. by 8•s�t , 1989. You may uee,"the .apace provided below or attach a. separate letter to return your comments. If yo re .unable ro respond , by ,,the: above date. lease ct noted ' �: �., .� y esti ®n� regarding phone the staff' conta below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as �poeo- �.�,a. � If ' a pD So*e 233A�' � this matter, contact the Tigard . Planning Department,. Box , 1312S, SW ' Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.' PHONE: 639- 4171.. ST FF NTA rTs PLEAS MR= THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the 1►,toposal and 'have no objectiond to :t.. Please contact of our Offica. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments .,..�I�:: Name of Person Coaeaentings Phone Number. .._.....�.e F bkia /CP; f89 -07 . BK m � � 1 tit i4• hies be sen • ° ::Of T1 ars3 urxstdic�,ion Cit Date ailed, 29,E .1989 , Local File' Number ,CPA 8 OctobE; Date !Set for Final Hearing on Adoption tin` On nal hear vra 1989' - (approx . , Year (�1 1. Time and Place for , Heartnq anning &0Rm1ssion" ' ' I ` u e s . i . . . , , , , 1 9 8 , Tigard Town Hall CityCounc Ot bfore ,q . 16, 1989 -' sed Action (C'hec'k all that apply) , Type .,r�.r. Comp reieras ive' Land Use !fie Land, Use Re ulati.oin amendment RegUatLOf X Plan amendment__._ '9 - --� Please 'complete (A) for, Text, Amendments , and (B) for „ Map' Amendment; Sunwta and Purpose ,of : Proposed A.ctioxt (Write a Ibr`.ie.E rat descriptiOn of the ,proposed action. Avoid highly technical terms ark stating "see attached "• : 11." 1, 0111.= / wrrl ...At 11." Residential and a 'Zone Change from C P . to R -2 (Residential, to ��iu�r -Nigh Density Resid 25 units /acre) . I to �:r; ',1 Out to e FcFll w .ng (For ea h area to, g . For Map •Aasendmen ch an g ed, p ro�v .de a separate sheet if necessary. Do not' use lie � ,p tax lot number alone.) Current Plan Designation: C -p Wmnieresciai Prof anal, Current zon CP ntia125 ° $initsticre. Location:, Street.' ,.-..+ y`. 4• * t w ,4 • ;, ,N? k� i':M , hew p,w . l; ` t % 4 ,?'` acres' Acreage �Cnvolve _• - Y � ry Does this Change Include` an Exceptio44n? F A i 4 15* k1wiM ,1t ^�` G w4: R 1f� A I 7714eaopoisti„i ed' Plan Designati�°�n &'» • =op�sa zone:.,; .,1 IA Yvi`V. 4 • ( to �:O_a �. 1.11' For Residential Changes Please' Egpc %M; 9 { Y y Dense c+ Acre: "Mr a� i" r t 1 1e1 ry' � Pe �n Unzts' x� Y 1�Tet ° A,Cr • Current Density 10: raposed bensi, ..w List a �� State to or Federal Agencies m Loe'U ,, rlowernment or Ioca;l Special S,,crvice Districts W Ich; may be Intereete4 in. or Impacted, by the Proposal= Direct Questions ; and Comments To Jerry Offer, Assiei .amt Planner . City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall ' 3lvdl. , Ti ard, OR 97223 (Phone Department of Land Conservation 1175 Court Street, N.E Salem, Oregon 97310-0590 '. NOTE: ' If more copies ies of this fOrtat are needed, please contac t the DLCD office at 373 - 0050, or this form may be duplicated on. paper. p green paper Please,` be advised that statute;4 Y'eq 1� " " ' 4..p that � uirea the � �axt of a prcaPesaY to be provided. A genaral descriptaton of the intended action, is not sufficient. Proposed plan and lane regulation amendments must be oG sent to DLCD at least 45 days,' riO use r final it '`,,`;(See•�,oAR '660 18 "020)'', Y p �► to, the a.nal eara.ng�,, , niNkaU•M'ax *F4..�• . s,;.:a -.w+J * F OR DLCD OFFICE USE .M1 V'. PROPOSAL VESCRIPTION= FILE NO:. CPA 89.. 0.r. 89 -07 FILE TITLES. METZGER- EMSAOCKWELL APPLICANT: CRI''i'ERION EQUITIES 1800 ONE HAIN ' PLAICE 101 SW,MAIN ST PORTLAND, OR 97204 6t07 ` DAVID G. METZOER P.O. BOX 275 SHERWOOD, OR 97140 OWNER: RAYMOND E• ENS 13c" 00 SW 76TH TICA1D0 OR 97223 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL or A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM 4COMMERCI iL PROFESS,IONAL2. TO MEDIUM -HIGn DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM C -F) T. R-25 (RESID2NTIAL 0 25 UNITS/ACNE). VNN‘',1219.4w.: -r A0706orito.fr rtA/4#0111(40, ''2ND AVENUE BETWEEEh Sid `DARNS STREET AND SW FIR LJb'^,�A'�ION: WEST SIDE OF S�� r IBTREE,'T (WCTM 281 1DB TAX LOTS 800 AND 801, 251 IDC TAX LOT 30C) ZONING' DESIGNATION: C -P COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DELIGNIATION: C--P' NPO' Nos 5 CHAIZPERSON s CRAIG HOPKINS PHONit: 639-5823 STAFF DECISION XX PLANNING COMMISION — HEARINGS OFFICER XX CITY COUNCIL DLTE 03 89 TIME DATL .__ /_ /� TXML DATE 10/23189 TIME REQUEST FOR COMMENTS (see attached list)' RETURN BY /. ATTACHMENTS: «. VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN 1:X NARRATIVE * ARCHITECTURAL PL:. ''N SITE PLAN _D30 *INCLUDES VICINITY HAP. ARCHI` ECTUA L PLAN STAFF CONTACT PERSON: JERRY OFFER PREPARE' FOR PLr-NNER APPROVAL: 2x ADVERTISEMUNT TIMES 09 21 19 .'(PC) T!MES 3 89. (CC) NOTICE TO PROPERTY 0%1ERS TO BE MAILER LETTER OF AC EPTANCE OF APPLICATION /jam NOTICE TO ATTACHMENTS: Mr'. Jerry 1Of fer Assisktant ?la tner Comrcilnaity Dei/el opment Department a. j CITY OF TIGARD 13125 .x , a a,ll Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97 223 RE'" Tax, Lot Number ( s 3 600, 251 , 1DC S l 1 e,r Purchaser: Dear fir. Offer: :� (authorized `.s 3,s to serve .as notice that th` undersigned as u,�ner C authori y t° This hereby' representa.tivre) of the owner of the above 1 °ef tr-esced ` prope r ty, accthorizes Criterion Equities to submit a rezoning applictiLon to `change ithe exiting zoning' from CoricuTiercial/Professiorial to ),Iltt °fatimily R-25 Are also prepared "to cooperate fully in gainintt the retonL,ng to R -25 Sincerely, r" yinon, , ns Phyllis G. Fins : uomm, = • , , , • ; , 41, 41044 144..1 W.A.., „ '44:b1 Ake' -61 CA 0414. 41.1■14,46.4,11 , OJT r f OF TIGARD 00111UNiTY, DEVELOPMERIT DEPARTt1L f RE- c1PPLICATIONi CNEORL.XS' .; PROPOSAL DESCRIPTIO( /N ` SSARY APPLICATION (s a�rar■'��■ 11 Fete" 5E v � � Existing Adjacent Property north tivkt V' south east 56,4 e 00 r :44:004? , boast IAA VC 'S( QletC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION a ,� ZONING DESIGNATION' C ' �"�L# 144 .;;�. =.. . NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING OR 4111 NO. CHAIRPERSON ... / "/& VANI'�Al� � ... .; y �..� ___■_ems. �., COOS' REQUIREMENTS w- '� • Minimum � t size /vii' t� :. Seti cks : Front ' s stoets� h --"u. establ3 shed are S�►ec�al setback � I lower• intensity zonesiO wetlands i lag, lot ... accessory.s reit,tures err iot! 31 Right -of -way dedication Ib. ail Sanitary Sewer... imorovamentwrr: Th dmin ��tatb. �e decision ` ar•` Public appraximatell 30 days r after a ,, comp1ete application 4 ay appeal period folicws all .derc , a � n�..' ►� �' -Special height 'imits enis.), Oalculat on o ink Oeisity tr�ansitiOn' �� 'alitiyP tMSr� i t �Y��t �f � i Y 2k lewsv diwo I�hl P1 1andsacaping: minimum. % 9fi of area :0�� - ' �Qd�na'Fean. Street TO es _c.° [V Ip eiii' Ickiffer ^Flgreas P<t!rk ing' Areas Q+, "C '`r..r' e + ,'a � Qr�,, t Pik a ..' �... 'YI,'V. is '.�' Vi'S64 F clearance ;1�itsr rish;: b �l $ • I P awd r I I �- �,. tie, '::. re c'd' and load 1. vkt�+ s te, . PY . b iivi r at,, ' �. e for : d ^dab i i''h �• , Parking n9- �' . .� ..,._.,��.. - �► --'-- �-- Ac secs. anal circ41, „on LOO Mu " Wilait5 � ; , .ROO Uhl 6, - .3 Occ ?S$ tictitiaiiite, iliantiltitAlijmitiLraggLi,,iye':-'''. ::.: - ,, , e' 1_, , iiiiiiiiip,. ,:#14,66`; 4ritie,way,, widRi S i'); ns t E'S G' ' ►,,' OThE 14,tNs 6ERA1 °Ns; S,,ns'itive aid's: Wetlands -�- 4I l �J#, . J Nv tt, II141 ►co a pplicetif on checklist for itQ■i ��flo�odplatira �lrain�agey '257G Po:.��.: Open apacQ Historic 'overlay. `-- Street +imp ments /connectiofsib ikeways 5f re _ C rou�o � ',fie 7 J►G r I tt emu• .I dewa^ ,ht-of-way dedication ja,dieL r O �a0. AA , dieaie . �1�tl Dh Sanitary .;ewer in p rove.. inent t_5` .., aii IOW ea e` o . ^-'i el 9 :ite�rm' Sewer improvements o UU� `; l A ea od:h Improvement Agreement Perm! t; Boards, lr ee s • 1 _.___ Other agency �rerwmts � ,,' i0. •PROCEbURE ,, • b iiie i+ .''eV a l t) as cg414 't'� 1 CVla i D / Admzr�ie•cratirae staff review •� � � �� p.. • . /Hear•intti Officer ,; .. . h. ublic tearbng nano .Commi s$ i'.. Cl c Hearings P lan . _ :. � - . , Hi aria Pu%li u a.a�'i ., or ,pug +blc � ng �"�ie hdmznistr atiire deca.s a� roil imately 30 dayt of tier 'a complete ' application i s ° f'i'led : PP .4O4day appeal period o, :dots 'aid. deci'siOns.,' X $ 0/oO2,2P, • • •• , , •--1 , s• c., Staff 4U13 _ /&'"-• CITY OF nal) ,•. ,C014'fitiNITY DEVELOPtIENT DEPARThENT .• ' ,,,, ., APPLICATION CHECKLIST ,•• tr-oP__ str&--DEliao . I . , The ' item on the ic'n'ec '1St below titre required for the successful identifies 0. f your, application submission requirements. This. checklist ldentifies wha is required to be submitted with your ,ApPliCatiOrl. This sheet nun be brought and submitted with all ottleo.. ' lua'tet-ials at the ,...:.,lmo..- you, submit your • application. See your applicatiort for further ianation of ese 2, ems or call Planning at 639-4171. • .• , . , .• '\' , ITEMS TO SE (3AST.0 MATERIALS ', ',, • INCLUDED' A) Applicaticort forlit (1 copy) C) Title taris r instrument 8) Owner's sigrtatLor'e/written auttiott-iation trarssfer t 4 Els/ Co) Assessor's map E) Plot or site plan IL" F) Api:rlicant° s statement (G) List of property owners & addresses within 250 f'aet E - (II) Filing fee (S, e.g,....te...s4,,efi_olf,._ . (• _ SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) i010 (No. of copies /at_ ): 1) Vicinity Map , 2) Site size & dimensions 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for gr•sides > *0%) 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds • 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) F7Icc-;..iplain areas (, • b) Slopes it, eiccess of 25 1 ( c) Unstable ground E 3 d) Aretas ,wi,1:h high seasonal water t.i4ble • '( e) Areosts with severe soil erosion potential E ] f) Areas having travel-01y 'weak foundation soils E 6) Location of ressourCe areas as slicown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats b) Wetlands (3 7) 4Difieu r. site features: a) Rock outcroppings • E 3 b) Trees with 6" caliper measured 4 fee from ground level • 8) Location of existi.ng structures and' titeir• Uses ' 9) Location and type of on and. off—site rioi•fie sources 10) 1.0cation of existing utilities and easereerits • 11) Locati‘arl of existing dedicated right—of—Ways , ) Site Ctevelopmerot Plan shot.iiriq (No of copies ): 1) The proposed site and surr.otinditrig properities • 2) Contour line intervals 3) The !.ocatiorii dimensions and names of all: a) EXisting & platted sti-eets & •other publi.t ways • nd easements on the site aroti °IN adjoirang pro ertie3 , • AfiPLICATION, CHECKLIST — Page 1 LV E 3 ' • 1 • 1 1 1 Grada,no.Plikn (No. of coplas The site devaloixnent plan shall. include a, grilding' plan at . ,.. he same scalt as the site analysis, drawings and Shall , 1 coltztain the' folloWittg information 1) The locatilo and extent to.,which grading will 'talc4a ... place. indicating general cont6tit 'lines, slopa ratios and soil "ettlhilizatic,n, propoimis,,, and .tAnla. of !Oar it is proposed to be done. 2) A statement from a regist4ered 4nginearilsupporteci bia data factual substantiating a) SubtUrface exploration and.gac)tochnictil ettilneer,ing report .. ' i ; ' 1 b) The validity of sanitary saviee 'and storm ,drainage carvice proposals c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated , .. . . ,....... D) Aechitoctural Drill/tint/ (No, of copies ,D■ The site development plash proposal shall finciticit4: 1) Flivor plans indicating . the sqUitirt, 'iootage of all , , , . i d structtaret proposed for LiSO on—tite; and , 2) TYPi-cal elevation drawings of atictilhestsettainctO:6. hail, 1) Descriptiotv of the irrigation tys,Iti'Olerie'APPI$i,ca '‘ indiCate: The landscape plan 1 drawn 2--",_ if 1 of the 1".2114s111----' 1 h silal , be _ site analysis plan or a largeetscalo if irlPetiartfla v E Plan (No. .. a , , , ) Locati6n and height of fences* k;iliffeett':hieki'stireotting Locatif k.farrace or 'are and c rl kiPen'-`sPac e63. ,,„, , "- Location; tyiifii size ' tl, _PrOPoeu Plant,"materia 4, la scope plan shali include a harratiue ,",w Ac resieS so.' ' ,, ,% v conditions. ",'," ,'' ',', . r,. Erosion con au •tha kfti, be used., igrt Drawings . . rior to .4.,btaining a tEluilding Permit to cdnsitrtact, the *ion. [ Sign drawings shall be submitted ' in ac 017 ni:e ‘witti.,ch"ptibe 8.114 of the Code as part of Site 1/eve opmeirit Review ' or Traffic,cieneratictn estimate', Pr.eliouirm:iL alpr.titiori or lot line:a jiroistaitent'InapLItIoi.e,,in, '(N+3. of ccpi.e5 , ): 1) l'ile owner of the subject parcel , '' , E 3 ' 2) The tiialner's aiutttorized, aagent ' , '' , E ] • 3) Tile map scale', (20,50,100 or 200 fee1=1), inch nortt! arrow and date , ,,,--:, E-1., • 4) Description of pi:Arce'l location and bonclotrle,f...." ( I''''. 5) 'Location, width artci names of str•ests, easements ohil , , other public ways within • and adjacent ttA the parcel ,( : I • ) Location of all peifisortent buildings on ztnd withiro9) • i , i , . 25 feet of all 1:)r•oper..ty lines ' . , [ i 7) Location and width of 'i11. water courses " ( 3 0) Location of any trees with 6'1 or rjreater caliper at 4 feet. *_bolIce gr.o..:114 level '' 1 ] i I 91. • All slopes greater than 25% ;' (.3 • ID) Locatiot,i of 4ixisti.r‘g uti.liti(as arc! utility 'easiements E ] 11) For major hind patr.tition which Clr'011tliS a'publ.ic street: a) The proposed r•I.ght-of-way location and. 'width ( 3 " .,, h) A scaled ct-oss-ssecti,ori of the proposed Sil'beCt • • plus ;rkrty reserve strip • ' . 12) Any aPPlicala]Le deed restrictions ( ". 13) Ev).dente that land partition will rtot preclude efficient futlisre land division where iotpplitable ' i 3 1) Subdivision Preliaallvnak and data shoolinq(No. of 4 Copies ). I) Sale equaling 30.50,100 or 200 feet to the inch tir0 limited to orle phase per sheet E 2) The pvs‘Ipto5e(:1 name of the subdivision 3) 'Vicirtity map siii3toing property's relationthil) to 1;11t-teri.11i ritirtd co114ctor streets • -( '3' 4) Names, aeldresset and telephone numbers of the ownar developer, engineer, surveYor, designer. as applicable( 3 . 5) Date of application C 1 6) Bouridal-y lines of tract o be 'subdivided , 3 7) ' Names of adjacent sUbdi.V133.ori or names o recorded owners of adjoining pairIvel's of itinvibdivicied land .3 8) C°n°lJir lines related to '4 citY -established bench- melt at 2-foot intervals foe, 0-i0rh grades 0i-eater than 107. AP P itION CHECKLIST Page 'V s • rpose;` locaticn, fvpe fol owing (w;,th.iri 'a'nd ,adjacen sea ,t , subdivision.) o • °: ��r a) Pu);lic ,and „pri�vate r ,ght f ays - ;casements b)I Public and,private sanitary i a id'"'.. to sewer sines c) .0600,40,',:,,,,,,* ter mains irc1 ding ,fir , 'hydr*nts d) Mlajorx power telephOrCi transoss'sion lines (50,000 volts or °.great'er) p Watercourses ) f) Deed reservations fir. rp arks , open s0 cp; pathwa and other, „land encumbrances 10) `Approximate ,plan. and. profiles of pro'posed sanitary;, a sterrn 'sewers 'with 'grades ,arid pipe' sizes indicateo 11;) Plan lof the ';proposed water d'istri but'l.on asysteaa, ,showing, Oipe sizes and thA location:, of 'valves' and, fire, hydrants o f shed 12) �LAppra�cimate conterli,ne prafk;�. s ;;�h,��w��7ag ,.;.the:, a� grate Of all streets inc,AAki'ing •;str_ ,, extetnsions, f ©r a reasonable distance beyond '" the ,?1 iaaits . of .the',; proposed zubd iv is iion. 13) Scaled :cross cross sections off' propos: , street. right —of- -.may.; ( 14) The 'location of .all areas ub j eot ; to irund.aation ar. storm water overflow: 1.5) '� Locati on, width' and direction. of flow of d° all„; water- courses and' drainage 6saytH 16) The proposed lot configurations,' •epproxisaate lot dimensions Etid lot 'numbers Where ;' costs are to be, us � for pg r Ras os' other, then rlsidcntia 1, it t Shill indicated upon such lots • 1 a�•d iauamater 6� ':inches or� 'r) The location Qf �a111 'trees urth , gr zatnr roasuirad at 4 feet aabovn. ground 1eval,, aand ' L. the, location of, prcpotred, tree plantings, its an ", 18) Tha exi'atirgg uses of the property, including tha; . location *flail str ectures,.' and trio present , `uses of the structures, nand a statement. of which structures are to raarain after platting 19) , Supplemental information includieag:il a) Proposed dada restrictions (if any b) Prof o cf proparty ownership . c) A proposed plan for provision of ,subd iv i s,ion improvements 20) Existing natural ftati res including rock out- croppings, wetland: and Marsh areas,,, 21) If a any of the foregoing irnforviatior cannot ,prtaactieably ce be shown on the preliiinaary piat,.it shall be a po ' he 1_ i+• rat+�d into �a r�ra�at�.vaa and suki�aaa � ttee isith t, , J • l application. Other. `a fsrmaation ] LL (2362P/0028P)''' A PLICATION CHEOKLItT =' Page 4 ' r�si'r -Y � • � n�,ir��rir_�. moire/ LI • • !t8 • 3850 U.S. Bancorp Tower 111 S.W. Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97204 James W. Ekberg Vice Presiclmt Operations 3850 U.S. Bancorp Tower 111 SW Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97204 CITY, ,,OP "TIGARD CetlfUNITY DEVELOPfiENT . REPA PRE -- APPLICATION CHECKLI PROPERTY, LOCATION Address 144 Thx Map/Tex Lot PROPOSAL OESCRIPTIO!!! /NECESSARY APPLICATION(S) -USE' Existing Adjacent PropartY north south , Quist we s .444 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION 0 . ZONING DESIGNATION P (Prk, . NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN JNIfii^ ORGANIZATION NO.) ! CHAIRPERSON PHONE n. 3 ej ` `� ; C ; minim m lot size/width Sat ac cs : front rnQr SPeci 4thacks: lower intensity flag 'lo streets established' areas zones wetlands ,. accessory structures Zero lot lire 'Maximum let coverage 1 Special neight - iiunits Density calcultiCf ensity transition Parking Are4);(1 Visual clearance.e,, Pa`trk ing .and load ir:g vow +a«�h�a� .air +�ei OTHER CONSIDERATIONS (Sae application Sensitive lands: ,floodplain Wetlands Open space Historic overla Street improveme checklist for' specific itema) irainageway )25% sloped ,v Mgt , k' 'ieva PI th ►Iicie c747 -- his 1I Eck Bight - of -aiay dedication Sanitary Sewer improvement, 10 PROCEDURE AdministratiVa staff revie`v Public Hearing /Illearirrgs Officer° Public Hearing /Planning Commission 6144 tivn deci . ,. s ion , .. shall occur The Adainitteaa o r rubl�c Qar ng approximately u days after a coOplote application ll filed. A .&o- iiey appeal poetod poet follows- a'11 decisiens:, (05710/662.2P) north east west �. COMPREHENSIVL; PLAN OESL RATION ZONING DESIGNATION y .d NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION r ZATION 1110. � �HA�RPI�RS�,`1N„�',,�+a CODE REQU7.REMEW 'S t1i,'niaaum lot size / dth Setbacks : Front Special setbacks : stOee.ts a to � hed are i • e . ,� lower intensi ,� zIwes tland s w flag lot acceszory structures 'z'iro lot,', 'tea dmulm lot coverage 1'�ex imu n building height ehsity transition Signs, OTHER' CONSIDERATIONS (See application checkiasst :Por 3 if;ic itams) : Sensitive la ndsi floc+i p n drainagemay' >2b% `ilo WetisAhds Open space 'stork ove + street irp^owtIaQnts ecnha � i ons ► bike WEY s Right --of -way dedicati Sanitatl Sewer impr vemer t ..rn newer r orements 10. PROCEDURE AdrinistratiV • � Off r Pt�b�.ic, Neap ��ng/Hear�r�gs tce . ..., .' .... I 4 � • P blic H rit /Planning Commi3slot The A Iministrativi decision off' Pu,, -! lc ' Haring approximately 30 day after a complete ap lication �0 -day appeal period foi i c is i s iGns . " ' A) Site Itlforrirasktioil sticttioirs (No, of copies _)I ( 1) Vicinity tap 2) Site size & dimensions 3) Corttcur lines (2 ft at f`...40% rPr 5 ft for iie..acies >• 10%), ( 4), Dral.slakge patttir.rts, courses, and ponds i , '( 3 5) Locations of riatirralkIL tiazani isms 1,14:%uditig: a) Floodplairi alr.eats ' i ' , ;.,, ( 1 b) Slope4 in excess.of 25% 1 i . ,, ' 1 . ' , E 3 c) Unstable grotind t 3' , d) , Ares with high searsoriskl. tt-..,Aer ital)le'., - ( ] i 1 ,.. _ al) Areas with sewers soil erosion potentisil ( i i f) riltroxals havirtg severs■tly 'areal( tUurtdatiork soils 1 1 3 - Location of riesorArce sires as shown on till) Cotspr.ehentiLvri it Mittp irivi,eritor.y including: a) Wildlife hal)itaii..." b) Wetlaridt . El M) Rock "outcrsipssirtgs ' 't, E,',3" Other. site features: b) Tree., with 6" + calip.,r. meskstir.ed 4 f'eokt i li 4 '1 ) , I t ' I frotrt grotend le%rel t .,(' 3 = 8) Location of existing strtactues a r i a the,ir lasts , i ,','' ,„( 3, t .....1 9) Location and tyile of on and off—sittg rooisa', satires*: t't E 3' al 10) LalcatiOra of eicitstitig Utilities and ilaceirm:'itir * ,t '( ) 11) Location of ertitit.ing dedicated emight-ro-wakys 13 Sit® Di�jt�iaaret Piro shoWirti (No. of coisiiiti , i): i- ', E' 31, ., 1), Title pro ' site and i stir.rotribdina t)rtifiertilii7" .°' '''''''-ii,t,*, ,,( , 3 2) Contour Una 11 ale ' ' - ,'. ,' ,, (3‘,'-' 3) The 1c)cai'iorl, diisens ' and °Itl*IntS of al/. ,. ii A) Eitisdti.ng ifs platted strdett,,&,Otttfitrb tvi.u17)3.it ii and Likatilrm;arits on the site ari&n 'alijOin ng i.,,,,,,, tv 11-14 tr , it ,,,i0,810 pmr rg.i mum liria Mira i4S1 11.111:: 1/11/., ;IU41111 rail I ri Illriira.n2W1 1111111 Q. jJ d 1311111111rdam Dill a__ VA IV 111111111/ L! vs .1:a.c,' 26 25 t. 35 36 ce.„p AOLdiater 11111111 STOUT 11111WAs, Lgras \ ELtiazi/TAril,, Do■i,id W. Hughes, Hall [3otilevard1Profestional Village 11565 5,W. Hall Boulevord, Tigard, OR 97223 5031639!;9346,,. 203.96 1700 ,4613°W 3500 .25A „s, .50Ac. t2 1400 #1. °Ali Z.47 Ac •" 3+ 206.66 • Nelsow .., � ,,.y:;n:.;.�`►.i�" .. 7:, u .a.;:: , ." :.:, • .":° .: t '" .;:.�n o � 's.� .. .:.;:1 ! .7�`,' iPh ..y. ,-` .r ', , i,�,.< �1 i � , �,,;;'a t a` h� i , a`.::i � ';�I i � ?r 4 ,i� 9�C 4 ....y » . • „� : .. . , , {:` T ':L l.ry, � e 1+�-�� I , .. ;i,t ., ..�. �� _ f �,�,:n ��.�� ;,,. '.«T..�. „ ��:��:: i ��; 4 j.. r ��:,� l a d .�.,.,,t s.{b � .�, ��•. �t 1 "�' wr, 1 a�'��I� � `�:i'. f 1 ;�' ti �:�7� t r � � a ,1..: �f� .a r :�'� y ,'�6 �. 'a'.�- � �y�,'�� , i �� w ��. I �r zl .i'1 t-'�� r�'M�'t .la.� :'3ri� � ��!r � , J,�i ,,": �,e� c , �.�,; "i.� ' �_ ,•, � ';y r�'��,4 � �^:r t; rv � ^i�� ( �k, .,,�,, �,iz, �r .� e � � w r,"�r' �� :` t .rG C L..,l�; t �,.i.. d. �t:Y i � �p � 1 �;C,�. ��i� _ ',I .','� �' ��t t .:r�� 411. {1.�,�., x t �.,1 n :� ;�� i.:J n ,i1� w'Y: 1 .�,.�r � 'y �.`l' i r l d� ._4.�; F` { �G. � :��d.� ':i , ..,; ,� � GA ,r b. ,,,':� „ �,y'� , .,�� r , �� ,, ,�,, �!°�'I, .'.�; :.i:...� ,,a`:` �. ,^_"r r� � .+�:� u l 'ri f ` i ��' ' I 1-.�+ � 4 I i,k �I:.' .�i.1 }.w 1 !�\�4 7 ��y`I ,I'�! 1 �.1�,� 9'` !I�. +M•��o �� 1 k,' '.�� I�',�b .��: f �� g.� �y a A�M�.�. A•, � �'.! r r� t:��1 �.�� . . �., � �` �rr�� ...� ..�.� � �� 4 s^`� i �'K �M�� .��.ff�i V��cw :i*,•,� ' .r:�� i ' C � } ,,�;.. �,��'�t.,r�` �,�� °� ��r� �Of� 4` °�4 i i�f o� � � t.� n� h�� F ..y'� �, �� .�r} �7 a�� ,h'-fi �� ,�: �Ak la 4 r �> wi I.' '��LL� k r` � j;. � a .I°�;��: L �i a 1 f a t '� r � •.�.� + .;�' y: ((( � i .^� 1 r{ �� 7� J ! ` � � `t M �. 1•�'1 � \ V' .�71 ^,� 1 � d �I` ^Y ��S {' e �� " '��,. � ��i�'�� r I i „�'el 1 la 1� � ,,�ll ��..��;,�t \I O s . , . S� . . . , .. i4 . . . . , .. . A�, y , . , . �. .�'� �i��I rY ,. ':)!� I . � . � . .1} h l 1�i ., �-.I Y�N �� Z� ' %r ,��Y� ` ,, ''' �11E�.�QP�1'�' A�PAR"1�'`_�,^ � ;; , . ',r' � �� ' , �: w ,�� I - 4^i��,�s r t�` } � ��.� ��' � i ��)� H i ' �° �RE-�APP�.?�"�A�lO'fa� i�EC� , ` fi, , � , � , _ �S['�'i r�# . <, , . . . . . , � .,i, ; � � p 7�•i ' ��. "� �' �\� ,i 1+� '^ r I�..� '�.�1 T.,ry °'' � ( �i � K �„' _� Y � i �� A�' -0 '� . . . . "I . 7 ..� �' . ��. 1 J ,.S I ` .. � . .. . . . . . � .r. , . ��' , . . . . . .. . . . ��-I . f! . � . �I . . , 1 � .. �I�� i. � � . Y � 1 . . .. . . . . •I . '.^ \ . . . .., ., . . .�. .. � . � .� . . „ � ,. . , . .. . . . . . � � � . � . � �, � . . . . . . � i .i < . ... . . �, . ., ,Y� � . . . . . . 1 .. . . I'. i ... . � . , . . . , i . . �. . . . ,. . . . . 1 . .. , . . . . . I��t . .. . ' . . . , � . . °..I) . . .t�� . . . . . � .. .. . , . . �� , , . . .i _ � .� . . . r , . � � ,..�.1. . .. . .. , . . , ,. v.. .� ,, � . � ��l•�� . . � � M� . �d� �� I 7tl�� X� ��1..lty�k,�1,`� �.��:;�� ! �'I :1 �� f lr� 1 � ��e APPl.�GANT ,� ��„ ;, � �'' _�' I� � � �, .� � � , . � . � �� ; � � , a� , ..�.��..' �;, � `�. �ROP�RTY LOCA1"It�N� ' �", :.; V � '4 7 �'1 ' , �' �.� � le � � �A`��+r�a� ' ' � � , � �� , , . . . . : � , , , �, -' .—,.,....—�.._;� ;�� '�' Ta�x I�g�/T"��t l.ot � , '��'L:.�� e� 7 ; ,,` _ �... - � , � _ � � —�� ..�.��. , • � ' � , � �� ,, � 3. ,��t�14�.wI.Q�8C�s'IP"�TQAI � � f . ,� SII�i��SA�Y A'PI:2[�A7'L�0110(� �� -- _ . _ � � �' , , . . , � I I µ` P' � r ,� '� ��' � 'r , � ,° � +r � � �� . . , ; ,, , , ✓• y i � !'i, 4.' �SE � � � � �� ' ,, ;t�; a . . � , . � . �,'' � _ , . � , �� :�, , , � _ . ' � �i:��t� " �� • � ,; � .� . `+ . - . . � . . , . . . •• � .. , , �� ° ° �' � � � , . . . . � :, �. . � � , , , , .. ;.�.�.�_.�.. � Ad��Cen'� Pro�er� ' , , ' . � '' ,. � , � � � � .: � �a�h � �� ,. � �' � i.�► '�..1'� ,�.�..,..�.�, ,. ,.� � : ,r ' �' ,.� r.�..i...��.e:��........�.�:. , � � • , ' � , �OUt�h ; �, , �., ��,,a" � , �� - �� w��s�►'- �� c i i _ . i a ��. �� , �: , . , � . : i„ : `, . , � , r � e�is$ '�.J�,� '�+� ;; ','� . i . . . .. . . .... "bYA r .. . . � . ,�. . �.� , � � . .. , .. .. .. . .. . .. ... . . � . . . , �� — � O��I� . . , .. . .�f I� I \ j � . ��1 .��I i� � . �. . . . . � . ��i .. i . .. 1�lA•S� _ '�1�.� ._. � ��►, , -- - c! , ��d ,� �..�.. . _ . . ,. , , . , , . . , � � �. � � , , '. , �. ' ,5�. �ONIPREH�NSIV� RL�illl� DE�Id�YA7°�[0111' � :. �- ,, � .. , , , � ; ' ',�,�, , . , w.. r._... , ..�. ; .,..�;,..,,..: , � � , . , ; ;, 6. ZANL�fI�'DESIt�NA'TI0111 � ` ' "'° ; _� .. , . . ...�,..._ 7 e �l��VI7a'VL'� �y GI�ItA'i��lll , , , � � I 'iN7..... . ' � , ; . �� PLf�III�IIING t1R ° 11�.' ,�,� �R'PER�0111 � . �..ti . . ., . _. �, i�� _��i��?r�t� , , � � � � ��. �� : � �� . . . :: . . � , . __ : . . _ , , B. �QDE ' � . . . ; _ REQU]tREMEMTS � �, , . , , , , ; , , . � ire��u� lot s3a�a/w�clk�i ' � � � , �� . .: . _... �� , ' , . � �� ,� � _ , _ � , ° , , � . _ , ; � �� , Setb�►c6CS: ��o►[�t .� � c��^ � s��l� . �.... . �„� , � > �...._.._....� , ,.,,�,.,,,,,,, . . , . , ,... , . � . � ��" � � � . ` , ,, . . . ;, � Spi�c3��1 ��tiva�cks s s�e��t� �ie��bli�sh�. � . ' .. .�� s � �� , . .. j , ....._�. ., .. . . ,. , . ...�_.._. � , ; ;, .. . _ � ..�_ . la�ia�r i�fltonsity z�►r�QS ' wati�,arnls . . . �., � . , ,. , e..�.,.�.�w... : ' � , , , . , ., . . , , . , .:�,...�..� � e �Ql�y��0�!'" i�t�M"3�I�tU1" � ,' , „ �..�.�.e.. ' r � _ �� 10� �� C+� . .. .� �ei . , ,, , , . . 1'Y� ��G�� t1�!''. .! . � „ ,...�... � _ , ;. ��i ..,,�..�...e.....��„� � � ,�_ � �` ."L''0 . � � � . � � , _ „ , , , ., ; : . . , ' �X�lOI�U� �O� C�!!al" • .... � " � � � � ,, ,-� � �, � �� .�.. � � . ,, , , � , , . , � : ;, >'� �� •�.....�.�.�..��..��,.,., �,� � �' , ,; ��, � ' -^ � M'��i iir�� b��d�iing hQ� ��' .. � � , �, , . g �� _ , , � � � '� . . ,, . , , ; � �� . , , � , �� o , � , . , ,.. i � i I I �� .i � � Ii' ' � + y :�y r �i: � . ,; . �. ��. ;; . . _ ��. �. . .. �. , , i., , .��:i, i I ' +e i n. 4 n�, i i �' � aw�i n" .�',q �ii _ Fi . ��i 1 'r ! f �, 4 � �1.�. � . . � a i . �i .;t-._ i . . . . � � � . . .l u ,�:., � .t v .�,]., . � . _ . . . . ,... ,.. .�i I o. ,i „� , x. ut, i � � ,,. . . . ,...., 1, „ „ir. j.�. - . . i; I a�e,� '!. �4,' �j; � ;� j � . 1' .� � ��'� ��..� � t�� :'-�N �' ,} �, \ a 1 �'' ,!.�. I I A' l:' ��' 0.� , � , . . . f �. .. . , . i :f- . . I. .., , 1 . 4 u `` A � 7 I . � l .. . . . I r .. , . . . . � . � ., • � � i . . . I . .. . .. . . � .� , . . ... . . ��.�• . . . . .. � . . . I . . , . . � . , � , ,. i � � , . . . ... . . . . � I �' Sp�acia�l I��ig�� t.i�n�s � ��la� �,�,ot : ��,- �.. ' �t�hor� � ' ''�� ,,,'--;�: ,S� ,: � , . DQnsa,ty �c�lcul�t�ion . - �, °;', ` : � , ::�. .: �. ,�� `�� , .� ,; � ��..e � , �� ', � � . . � , . � , , , , a� . ,; , . . r ,.: ' ' � . , . , , I �, .� . ,.' -: � . ��rS��Y��, �� , Dah�i�y� tranr��;3��n� � �r : .:,: ,` .� ;,'_ � � � �� 1 .. � .� 1 � . � 4 ,-� � "I y �'�+r�i�r��.'b��sn�awo��e.,rrw� . ' �,: , . . -�:�. . . ' .._ .. .'.�1��7A�I��IIrrV s�A��.� �. , I.�rx�sc��ing s� �o�r�i� �G of lot �rQ�;�` . . � .� ,. . - �.,,,,_, , , . . , , .; , . , . �. . _. , . . . S�rQa� .T'rQQS ` " ; � � � �.::.�...� �� , , �. , , ��,�. � euf�aP:Areas � .o ,---r:r..e- .. . � � ,� , � �� P��ki A rQa a _ , � � �;. . ; . , .. � . . , _ , �r,�,, �.'�. ,�.�. , � �� V , , i ' � . , , , I , , au�I c].a�ranc� ' �#� 1 ,, � ,.; �' �� _ . � _. � iPa�k� anc� o � c'� � ad ing , . � . �� , .� _ �� ..i. ,r��i�� ,s��' �' '. .. ....., ., r.. . . . . . , _ : '. .: i. k¢ .1 t �;�. ... _ ` ., . . . , �� ... , ._. ..,� � , .�-. ._. ... . ,. �� .�. � �.� . .. �.� .� , � .� ,, �'�1 ' ... , � � � '. .. , I . . �i... '� . , ' i ♦ Acc��ss a�nd cir�ulxtfon . -- �-' �.,�� .� ' ' r�,._.. , . � , . .. . . .. ,�, �, , . ;: �� . � ..r . . ' ��.' �' . ' . .. , _ , , z T , �,�.�..�..:�.,. . . ��- ., . �., L S�.gh� ' , , � � ...�....�... C � , � �. o�� 'c�oa�sau..RA�c�u� �sQ�� ►�t�c��io� ��o�kxist��r;'3��i� �it.�� . . � , � � ., � � Sansi�ieoq lau�sl�: ..fl�ad�s�la�i� � rlr��n�aw�y ��rZ57� slop� , WQ�larids � � , � � . ., � . , � � � ��; �� ,�� '' � ; � � � 0 n � ,c� � �� ,. � , - , � , . � p� � . , , �..,._,_�...... � .. ' _...- , , , ; , �fl��ta�� ovQr�ny� • ; �'fl R,_..r ,, • ,�,. . �- ,y . . . . .. . . . . ' .�I ... . . S��aot �a�proVOt��e�a/ '��ac�3��/b$kow�ty�� , ,�� "°� — a.�...��.:r i � , � �� _ .�.�.:,��.� ' , , . . . , ? . , ,Righ�-of-waty d�fca�t3on • , : , . . ... . . . . . i.:.� ...., �..�.� - • �. ..,. '4�±...s��.�r,.,�,�„i�'� . , . . . ;�� Sa�ini�ry �� 3�pr�vr�mint '� . � ` , �. ' � � � �, _. __ . , . . . , _ � .._. . ; ; .. ; ._ , , _ , �..��...:.,_ , > Storr� SQwar i�npravo�ants � . _ ; , _ . ..,� ., , � . , : , . �� ; , : , ; _ ; , Im�ro��o�ent Rgr^Qe�nt -� Po��it; �onds o �'+�;�s` � ' � ' , , . . � , �� a . . . �. .. .....�.�, , �.. _ , ; � � ' '. ., . , �:� .�.�..�. �; , �Othar ag�anc� par�i�ka _::. ' ' „ . , ' . � . � . ._. . ;_... ,-. ,. � .:�Y . _ .1�+�ra��wi'ir�lL�v+�ar�rir i� � ��. � ,. . i . . . ., ,. . . �,.. .. � �.. � i ...�,. . „�.�., � . . � . ��e .. . ...,,. . . .. � . . • � ., . .. ._, :' �.. � ... � .�� , '�. il� , ` ,,yiri��r�r�r�l�w"'i�r.�re°r� � 10. PROCEQ+l1RE � ' ` , ; � . .. . ..L . . . Y — Ad�n�n$strativa s1�f� r�v��iiu ,.�,;,' i : �!! � ; � . .. . :.. , • . .. � :, paik�lic Hle�ir�,ng/N��r��,ngs OPff.:�r� ., � . �.....- .. . ,.' ' � Publ�ic'we�►�f�i�%Rlatrini S�oi�ia��ssibr� �� ' ' I i . � . � % �i ` . :. .. �. �.'��.^ . .i�,. i .,.. '.. 'w.i�.�w'sw�d �.., .,. �..'.-, .........:��. ' � ^�' i �.�� -i.�; � �'1�e iAd�ain�stru��v�a� do��aion a�°` � P�ib'lic ..,r . � Ad �� Wta�ri:� s�lX �� o�c�� ; . . , , �i,,.�^on i�:�:o,i � . � � y :: . , . ..,:. : o��►l�t� applf c��ioi� i� fi le�d. ' � ' � � I � . ; R� 0 el , � � ,; � � a ��tep a� c II wt0-�iarl► a�RP+�� p+��^iod fo�loc�s �A1 ��c;�,,s��r�� '� � , o � ��"`��.�:.�, (�D573P�'A022P� � � � ��,,. ' � , � , , '� , �, � , � .� , . , , f�� ', � , �� ' �� "'i , �, , � , ,. �� i � ' ��i i i � �x, � ' � � � � � �1 �'i , . . . ' � i .il � w . � � �, �,' i, , . �. .�, . ' � �,...,. , ,� ,..,,�,:. �� . ... . .:, ._eu..,�,� ,.,...��: .... ,.a ��, . .., , .,�.�: r, . ,. .. t. ,. , >`. ..� I , � � t °4 f' ,. . . ,u�, ,.�: ,: ... .,,.„.. :........� .,.,.�.:. .,.. . . ..,. ,�......:. .. .. . �� ., i .�,,..,. . .,..,.... .,. I�... �. , e,�.:.�. {�t2: v�w ��. � �'�.�r r�Ji ht . . ��t•�1��i4 �M .,i" �F�h�,ys 7 hq t�`»`:• ..' � ' _ � . ' . , . .. • � - .� , , '� ��r��93 �`+� i. � �e�� . , . � i . . ��,✓{n�•�� H +, '�y1 k�� .... � . ' ' ' . �^ , ' �w - y� '"�. ' ,' � ' � � ��.. 6 /'+'�i9��p,. a�,� ., . �>� • , w . .. � , � . •� +.��4 ' � � � � � � � • . Y • � , � t�� { qy �1 5 o Y e.r' . „ - _ . a#, • . , .� �" !�#�l,a.��h�`N�F.. �,,�,P�r ' • • _ .. . . . + . _ . ' � C}fi�}.'�d°9! �sµ• - � � . . . • . ;' � � v ' " . . . '°" `` r . '.D • a F / . �r�.��ln�iy" �� '^j .��•1� •• w�•.r t.. ° _ � � w , '� . � �Y �. ,.� � _., ` . '.) ��1�� f�1�. �G�� .� �. _ . • • . � � �p� � � � • �� ! ��I�� ,r`��4".-.. ,v� _ w . , , • ' ' . ' ' • • - • '' • a' �t��"n � �"�,�.�� o .•/" • , � • � �• . , � � � �5�li`A h�iws., p - . • •�' ' .° • • . , , "u ., . y •P. �'?��}ws��, ,4��,-6 +� , . � tl- . . • • �I - 'y . ' •. � ;". � �, 6�� . �' ' � - . . - � • �r . . , • . ' . . r� �j�4S, i M �v�x �4 �•Y - � , • � . . �"� `�R � . • . I �• . . ,. . , . L�';��¢y`t�a } � b �I�.(f N hM� � a � . . . ..� � . 1 ��i��. .�. a ♦ i* . ' .e . . ' q`� CM t{y- r��s i ' , . � ' ' � � . - , '�' i . ,. + .. ` �`��l�i� ��'; �� i.-: . � I. 1 A ^ � � .' . . �M/ � , ,J� �. � , A� .�� .. , . ��. " � , �` ��.ry��X�ry�� . .�.✓�'� 1. . j • , . ^ � ' . . • �� • , 4 p r�1 y�� 1+;" . y � n ' • ` D . . n • . ��''17�''�L1'b,�� 3�;..Yr':�; y N� • � . � � ; � � ` �. :.�•. � ' . e y • , � � . • .... � ~ ' • ��r��i�l� �'�~ � t, . • � , ' • �� `�''� r�1K'- �y: �,s`°� , . ..�d , ' � " � ► .'.� , r ^ �`��'1�tY�.'�� r�y,i . .` " � . . • •6n .` '`fr. . , ... - � y-. �r . . � ' • . r� ' '�t ..�"�a��,.� '''��y"" 1W'~, , ' . ' M � ,� ,e° " p'. ' � r . , , ¢ y ~ . ' ' L � �r,�,t,9��b �'�-�:'' �� • � c^ � � � + ;t e�� •�• l , . P,' ,.Ay J��`�"�4 v ��"� �N'�k;y.;,' ' • � �' � - . . . ' ,• . . . - �' � . � ' . . . .I �a�,,�� .Ji,��' �1,;i� 1 ` 1�' ., , s ��y' 1�„ � �� •~Y o ��, . � ' . . .. � . , �7 , � ;. .t. . . • .. ' � 1 _ ..` ' ' r ', ' - .." I;• .,,..�w �.. `�� . - . , , � , � a �,4�,`�1'1 `�S ��«.• • , " . . �- ,. ��._I' . .c � ..r . ' :� -� , . . .y '�'��x��,y. �t�e • �� . . '�✓ ."r -. ,r . . ' 4 , ' . ' � •, � If �,i '� Y�k��t �n,�K « � , . . . ,. , r . . • 'r � �' 1y_,• '� i, • �'/ , � • ^ ,V - , � , .. S , ." I ' �i��i Y�D'� � �t . » , � • , ' � : �, , " _ , � wM � `.j4�v.'. . . ' ��.','vwjo �'�fi. �. r 'l . � ._' ,� � .� . .. � °, � .�� ° �- ' �� •�� y n �� yn. '+ .�', � , ., � , , • 4 ^_� � -' . ' � ..,�.,��r��. ,�.'-�. ."r ., . .: ,," • .'^�' - , .'�- �• ' . ' � "'..w`r t . , + , r'��, � ` .�.J� �� ;9 � M��-. a� . '�`- a , . � ,.S . .. � , • ' /.p ; . " ' ' a . . . � � �, ��rp�1'r�. J'd�/ ,'� ., �" . . ' � , '. . «. .. .. �, � �' (y ' � � . (^" �� ,��... . p-, , � � • • � , • • �•` �r�.r�•�� 1� y � . . �Gw. • . .l ,,,,P , , e. . , 4 � _ - . s . • . �. ,� �1, �� ' 4. � - � � y� � ' � , ' �� e �{!'+� : .. . � . . . - . . . .. ��'s �,yjI { u ' ,I TM`,{1Y� la I � ' � G � � ,+' « T�.. �a'M�� y �a +` ' �� s� �1,°�'� �, >�s ��Y � , { i�� "� � � ��rx. � . ��..9i ' w �" �"��' � tz�;;:'' � '' f, ,�}',� 1A1,1�, � ,A�7 IYL��iq. Y3 Y �.' �..�� !!4�:') 1 V . w4r �°ry�� .. t+�,a 4�A � '" �,� �`�f'�� v"�r" 4� } {�.1 ��xY�r,��`�" � , ' .� ��1,�1, � ' ;e,��,. 4��f4�nn„ F •,N1 �i!� � �'r�`"�,��''�� ' �"�y��„„ "` �c�"��'`t �� '�i �� „ytu r !;�",,, . `�i ��,�+i�+ �rn{?r u�'w �nr � � F�1u�i � , 1e �'�`' ��{l+��r5�„ �'�"`� :;:,; e i�a �r�'� #� :�P . he��„��. � 4+ i.,, � d �T��` �ji»1.;�t 4p'Fri,�S'�iX,,.�' r v ! � p� g � f��' y��c.'.,�y'n"p��S �tn,�,l��. '#�ix�r�+y.' „/-j's}'�q,��+p e�-t '�* c" 1'�� t. Hi o,,3 2�`.i �A�;f r��5 h��»' R ��'� y7��e`?y�'�r�^�E� � �,��,r�''�;� �,�µ 7+� � �� ;��t � Tr�"� 'T�� y,{� "��k�� r � � � � �r`Y< <�,�,'�„,�"� �'"wJ �,��,' ,r..+... -�.. � „ + ' . .u. , �� . . ;.. •, - :�j + � . . � Y'n ` ' . ' �f 5��"fC?' �f��,�, �� . ' . m� �� .� ��'�. - • - • �� . �i�,f# 1.7�„(,r�.1 kd� �'• �M �y ,o +.� � Q. , ' .. . � �''T�r y'�?'� »i� . , . .a f'^ _ _� ��._r.�� . . .. . � - . . ,�� : �'�p' '�;�.iA � ��+ • � � \ � •r��- . •.y ' . a �1 • l �',��I'F�Y�"��°'d�y��y,,. 3�r � a y..r,. IL 1 . . - W. .. � 4T3?�'� � °�" z +r �.• i ' - � � ' M�'� � � � • � . ' . . �'� . . - �.A��`��WV`�'�'.4 * ��. . . + �� .. rw � ' � ' kN n. "j�'�fy �i., q. � �•� . N •1 /�' 1�p � h• � ' � � . tr. ^�,��',l�yh�j r � _.�d •a� , py .+'� -^ . CF M_ � ^ O � � .�/� � 'e � � � ' �+;F�T'r�� ';Y J�//, �• ��}�y��y}��'�� ' ' 1 � ' • ! y .•`�+• .. w y ' _ • � . u' •- 1 �y�w,a�/d�p�^S,§�,�'��,��,�'�C .Af�l��r � '. , ��.' ' . . ' � r. � � ' . � . // ;'L'��"4•;`�,::Z �y.i�� F��v. .• � � � , e � . '` • '� ` ' � - �� , � � �I��'.��a� �• �+�, � �. � �r � A ,,� ^ � � . ' � � ��". 9 6 A � � • �'^v' � � • � / � ��. ,a . �� . ' ! � . _ �. . +. .. . . , '^� .• k��r{� ��yt LI .. � ,�t��w� . , � � . � ' . � � � � �j.��aw � , a' q �� `7� � . ,i+ � •� � �• . �I �,� " �n ��R'h'k�'N: �y i�l t . . „ .. � ,. I " . +,a• �, , • ^ n � ' �r ' \ ' • " •�'� �r�� r �� °� M� ' ♦ [ `�� n,�,� - '� � . . ' a, . .t , ^ 7 �, Y��'� � �, . • � .. + . � �» . 1_ • , � , � ��`�� ,�� M _ +y �`��,�^ � �. " f' �Y� . i - •� • � + ,�•+ ` _ � �q ^ � � . . �'� . '' �GM�ha'�'1�,q� � YF-�•i� .,� . • 'M " � , : �� ' �r,��i'�'��i`. �" Y��.. � � , a - . � .. . - • � ` . ' - • ' . ' �.��'��"��A R�'V'�:� �.�� (�5;' � yy.e • !e` • � .. ^�n* '„ ,'' , • ' �,w � , '� . � �\ • '. . •` �i+�.•�,��4V.��a � d� � ' - . , w • "• • . a �'�+ �.4i;t f 14�r dk-� � ' � + . l , � . , •, " �r,'�+' ��+�'z'��Y r��e . �� m� ,�. `��"% �r��i�r �iC: :, �,,•�..' . , I • . • • .t „ C��i � .,,�:,�� ;,�, � � . . ,! a , �� ,�.h�� a�{I�,�: ;. + - ,� , � /„ •�, 1 . �� ilk��r�s4 1) ��1'�' �1-w9,� . . C. � `J � rw r' „ ��' . �� '�� z+� ,,,� �,, _ _ - � , � - • �;, p .' M ,, , � ,�a+Y�,�,�„a ry�a "}'� i' 0 . • , � �- "n ' . '+ �'��J n��+ti�� "'�',� ' " � � • „ � '� + wa.' � . . k+=�'��.r.��tN�. �'��,�' ,� � , . „ . ..r, x"� .. ,f��,��"4!��a� r r9'3��'� ,� ., �,4 �' . . `� '/ � �.:,•» ` • .. ' � ' v�1"�.i�i�p�Ib1�. J�'i��•�' J e��d"��`f��i��. . . +� �- '� .. , . � , ,. . .. ., �, •i�:,. m, l 1':.`u.' . „�;,y.*.�.. �:�;i F � �'p� ,t��i.a;. '. wa� k. ,.,q�p,. . k.p,d�. �� ',.l��e`��.�er�,. , ,�„ �t.F � �e,�.. . �J �.� "... ar k'4 . _ � � � '�y' a ��{M^J'�}�y�y�Y,�,rr�,'.✓'Y� a f v., �R R'$�4 p}�+`�:'�4�h "�wy."�kA' ,��..i� 3��'NK:W- �.k,�",�.r+��M � ��+jr� ' a �I r .�'� I � •t 1�CS . j � � • �,�;� '�Y . 4 p 4 � .� . ,�.^ . S � .� . 1 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]