The URL can be used to link to this page

CPA 89-02 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. S'T'ATE OF OREGON Countjy. of Washington City' of Tigard `that I' ser ted notice of the "ic�ar'd City +Counc,i e w s as i^ is a copy (Marked V.xhibit Vii;/ upon each of the following �f them at the address shown on the attached list `Marrked E hibit <8), said is hereto attached, and desposited in the United States Mil on the ilk rr/t, ," G .a► Notar• Public of Oregon My A issian Expires; ti tt4411 3$4. 5 � r xber jo, swO h to before me this D day of AR�otriMad�a 4IQ bMbi' 1%0 Notary public of Oregon My Commissiorntpie� CITY OF TIOARD Washington Covunty, , Orego n • Concerning Case Nutober (t) : CPA 89 -02 AND %C 89-02 2 • Nan a of Owner: William B Sander - ._... � ... .... � Saul Name of Applicant: PinnniCg ReacourcM; ghc. fLaur .e r.,tke ®ewe o State OR 2L �.ZO4` 3. Address 3681 SW Carman Dive � C�.ty ; �.. 4. Address of Property: 11165 SW Naevo Strgat ran Rai:f • _`�: Tax Map and Lot No (a ).: 2S1 1ODS east . tax lee 200 5. Request: Eggueet _ for ra CagmE9hensive P1 n pdraer: fronn I ed psn®3.ty Residential to Residential 12 r4 n�.t ~l fit' IDs�nmlt Residential ' and a Sgl2 Ohm fre. Reside .?J acrl tc R -2a tR0.-.is spa al 25 units r0i for xi iatel ! a es .�.. The bnd rof thscel is jgaltangkeft gediaan-Hi h De zoned R-25. resit D�eeidexntial, and in �o • Ac�,:.. _ Approval as requested Approval with cond,�.tiona Dena/ . Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at, Oity Hall, and mailed to: x _ The applicant nd owner(s) Owners of record within the regu'„red distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning organization Affected joverr,:nental agencies Final Decision: THE DEC' ION WAS SIGNED ON BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON ►_ 1 iS 9 The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement 10'a6. conditions can bpi obtained from the Planning p all, • ��e merit � Tigard City w.�11 r . 97223. `�- 13125 SW P.O. Box 23397 r Tiga:~s. d r Oregon 9722 A review of this decision may' be obt fined by filing a notice of &tent with the Oregon Land Use Board of ,Appeals (LISA) according to the their procedures. V ..i. 9 M 52RB12IONS : If You have any gUestl' ores d P lead; e cab1. the T .t, sar C Recorder, at 639 -4171: dj/C9A89- 02.1).7 ' RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDING' AMENDMENT (CPA 89-02) . AND ZONE INC C IPREHENSIU'E `.. UESTE D� PLAN WHEREAS, the applicant requested Comprehensive Plan, Amendment 'a cres (eas c�ler�n half of ,111.55 SW ' Naeve S'ireet) from Me a um Deras't"�,' ' Residential to`. Medium -High Density Resident ial. and a Zone Chant e from ;; R - 12 Re s a dentiaw ;, 12 ,units /acre) to R.-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre); WHEREAS, the Planning Commission 'heard the above' a meeting, of April 4, ' 198g, and recommended denial; "at d WHEREAS, the Tigard City c^lj i heard the a meeting of April 24, 1989. '+ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by' the,.: i.' ar°d .City. Council tha s regu Sec@.ion 1: The proposal is not consistent with all relevan in l ho 'attached findings (Exhibit "A" Section 2: The City Council upholds the April 4, 1989, Planning Comwrission recommendation for denial of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendment as set forth in 'the ';Commission's minutes (Exhibit "n "). Section 8 The Council, therefore ORDERS that the above referenced request be DENIED. The Council FURTHER ORDERS that the Planning Director and the City Recorder send a copy of the Final Order as a Notice of Vinal Decision to the p. ies in this case. n c u Q X4 )1 Deputy Recorder - City of Ti turd RES�L.JTID+N N4.; �4 Pakg+ l fig s!. STAFF .REPORT APRIL. 4, 19891— 7:30' P. M . TIGARD PLANTING COMMISSION TIGARD CITY' HALL -= TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 AGENDA *ITEM 5..2 FACTS 1 Geneal Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 89 - -02, Zone Change ZC 89 -02 REoEST: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Medium -High Density Residential and a Zone Change from R -12 (PD) (Multi - Family Residential, 12 units per acre, Planned Development) to R -25 (PD) (Multi— Family Residential, 25 units Per acre, Planned Development) for approximately 4.27 acres. s APPLICANT. Planning Resources, Inc. O WNER: William & Claire Sanders . Street WE 3681 SW Oarj�nah Drive 223�� Bents st Luce Oswego, OR 97035 Aurora, OR 97002 LOCATION: t astern half of 11165 SW Naeve Street '(9CTtl 5S1 1008, tax lot 200). 2 Rack round_ Information parcel adjacent p y Tigard in Y _ d parcels were annexed ,to the Git of This an 1981 with a Washington County zoning designation of RU -4 (Residential', 4 units /acre). City of Tigard Comprehensnve Plan Revision CPR, 1-41 approved redesignation of the entire parcel from Low Density y ne change to R -12 Re.�adgntial to Medium Density Re�e�den�:ial and a zo (Residential. 12 units /acre) Thy! Planned Development (PD) rnverlay one was added to the requested R-12 designation so that all development proposals for the property would be required to be reviewed by the Plann %ng Commission In December 1986 , the Tigard City CouAmehdmef�t �`or i Chan Pp al to 4 - l a rev g this' Plan the AYhertson s Compe ehe►�s a ve r a�� I' ... designation of se'ver•al pr�opeeti located at tae southeast corned^ of Dur•heM Road arid a.i f i Highway This proal edesignated these PeOPeeties from High Density Re adential to Gentral Coninercial The result of this de & &iision was the r•etaoval of the opportunity for approximately 400 potential itulti— family housing :unit' fr e n Tigarryd `s inehtory_ .of vacant, buildable land. The 11 6es'opolactan' Housing`, Rule (Oregon Administrati +e Rules, Chapters 660, OL,yision 7) ' r~egrx,ires' that Tigard provide a housing . r+ un tausin dense least 50 percept multi faMl c units and a �net�ampo irni'm h it g at y y df O d aellipg 5 STAFF' REPORT CPA 89 -02 /ZC 09.02 (SANDERS) — PA 5 w lA un,4 t , ��pei a►cre�_;� off ;; vacant' dui ldab,le Planning, Area. The Albcrtson s CPA was gr"anted art ., the cc id i t fora . off ;; redesignation of sufficient' residential and to `higher densities to mike up for the housing opportunity short- fall;' 'created by the dec is ioro`,'. Several sites throughout) the City, including ' the subject parcel, ,'were considered for increased residential . densi;ties to make`; <u;p ';yfor the housing opportunity shortfall cr ated by the'A1bertsona s :;The western half of the ' subject property ert and the 7 p p y parcel to the; west were proposed for Plan /zone redesignation from Medium Density Residential/R-12 (PD) to Medium-High Density Residential /R-25 (Pb) (CPA 87-- 07(x;) /ZC 87-02(G)). No ch nge in i .: designation 'was, proposed for the eastern half of the 'Sanders' . parcel. " The ' p � proposed � redesgnatior� of the western half of the proper cy and , the adjacent .;parcel was approved by the City Council on Apri 13 , 1982. No `other (land use applications regarding ' �P g � a ng tha s parcel have been ' reviewed by the City 3. Vicinity � f y Information The Sanders' property is surrounded by the following zoning districts: R-25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units /acre, Pl,rrnned Development) to the, west and south; C-G (PD) (General Cc • amercial.,',` Planned Development)' to the southwest; R -25 .to the sounheast an-1' R -12 (PD) (Residential, 12 unis /acre, Planned bevelopment)to the north. Parcels to the west, east, and north, are undeveloped, tree - covered, and together w t h t' subject arcel form the southern slope of Little d'u'll Mountain,' The Fountains at Summerfield condominiums are located directly `south of the Sanders' property. To the southwest are several ,.undeveloped parcels as well as Hector' s Nursery which fronts on Pacific Highway. The Sanders property has approximately 220 feet Of frontage. on Naeve Street. Naeve Street tz designated as a minor collector 'street, by the City's Tran ~portatio ;i Plan !Hap. Naeve Street As general kg substandard in width and in state of improvements with the exo‘epti further nnrth tyf" tote. ,'dead ei�o:# , f his northern ''sectaon o SW 109th'; Avenue exter*os northward to C ecerbury - Lane, he .City's Tr• nsportatian Plan Map calls "foi the two segments Qf SW' 109th tp+ be cohriected .in he ireI Information ,end Proposal Des,�ri :tion,;' Tax lot 200 'is an 8.27 acre. 'pare °1 presen, ly developed '.WWi9 h One.',singie family residence' and several outbui ld ings . T property slopes to the s t,sth . "artd greet wit? an 'average,: grade of 12 :Per-cent., The"t"property forrrter''ly was.. used as a nursery. The ,:site. is mos :ly, wooded with a combination. of evergreen .,and deciduous trees. The largest trees are on the nor"theonmost <portion of the property. The southernmost portion of the ~property, between the house and Naeve' 'Street, is niesti.y open. The property is presently served by a sepci!. syQteai and , a well`. A sanitary sewer and a storm, sewer are located nearby at the intersection of SW Naeve Street -' and ' SW 109th Avenue. An 4 -inch diameter water main is located along Naeve Street. The Sanders' property presently has split Plan and zoning designations. The western 4.0 acres is designated Medium -4N'gh Density Residential by the comprehertsive, Plan Map and is zoned R -25 (PD) The eastern 4.27 acres is designated Medium Density Residential and is zoned R-12 (PD). The applicants request that the eastern 4.27 acres , be retiesign ted Medium-High Density Residential and be rezoned R-2S (PD). The applicants cite difficulties in marketing the property for development purposes because of the split designation. The Planning Diui.sion has previously ' responded to the 'owners'' and potential ! developer's' inquirie$ regarding the possibility of ate( {u aging the allowed densities for the two portions of the parcel with an ihterprel :ation that` averaging was not possible. (Exhibit. 1: July 11, 1988, letter to William Sanders ' from Ferry Offer. 5. Agency, and NPO Comments The Engineering Divas on has reviewed the proposal and offCr' d the following comments; The subject site fronts onto. SW Naeve Street, a largely unimproved minor collector street. Xmprovemeriits' to " ` Naeve Street tiould be required as a condition of any _development of the property: The Lnproved roadway 'should provide adequate v-ahicular access for the site at the increased density. Sanitary Newer^ and storm drainage it proyetnent.s mould' have to be extended from existing manholes at Std ttraeve Street and' SW .9th Avenue. :The sanitary sewer system is capable of ,:providing :the necessary se"vice at the rerluested intcreasr�d density. The existing) s=torm drainage system would Jbe. required to be evaluated' as a ;r'wt'i diei' n' 'of development cif the site,, Increased ldehsity will typically increase runoff slightly but the c 'cerall impact on runoff from :this. site hou]d be rn'inimalL STAFF` REPORT CPA 89-- O2/zC' 89-=42 (SANDERS p'tt� td' ;Oregon?i'i.State Highwa regarding the proposal site at either the ex. sting. or° improvements to ' Naeve Street' s' Improvemrents .could. need to be cans The Tigard 1.44ter District has conii anted th %,at l'r.s t�ca4:e�;. "yste a has the capac!lty to :serve` the' development , Howea':�re tic- :- :o0't1cer D stracct added.. ie : upper ' ort.aac of the ,site fros ° a that it may be necessary to serve s� pp >p. pumped water line 'from Canterbury':" \Lane and ,to, ser t.fe the' :lower, portion' of the site f=rom, a main located' \alOng SW , Naevo., Street because of difficulties with water pressure. NPO #6 has commented that the western .half, of tee property quid Le down —zoned r to R-12 nether than ba} ing a;tte eastern.. half of the . property: up—zoned to R-25. , the WPC) feels that tP;i i s wot ld make the parcel a more homogeneous, developable property that would ; be '_ compatible, with . the existing neighborhood. Tigard OcNool , District , 23;,8 ' .and Washington Count y . Fire District' reviewed the proposal :and have 'offered no commentS . or Objection t o FI DING: i AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning. Goals 1, 2 and 10; Tigard Comprettensitie Plan policies 2:1.1, 6„1.1., , (� i 8 2 . 2 , and Chapter 12 9i oni i and th V i � � i , -. � � 1.. � d `�' • li riwVbGA V/ �6'4Ai C'�dA1i Criteria; ' 6'JZY FYA the change or mistake iluasii-- judicial . map amendment criteria of both the. Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Cole., The Planning staff concludes that the prop.9sa1 is w,onsi.stent, with t applicable Statewide Planning Goals and ,Gu del fo 1 lowing "findings :, . ' Soa] 01 is met because the +Citt has adapted a ,. itiiens °, nvoalvement program including review of all. , development applications by, the 'Neighborhood , Planning Organikatidn (PBS) In addition, all public notice requirements have been' this application. Goal 02 is met because the City has appl aed all ,,,applicable Statewide Pl r�,nin Coal ",. nsa.ve P ,�, rCit Comprehe tp Plan evuev o art CommunIt Developanent. Code requirements the r y t proposa'I VI Goal 1110 is sati4fied because, the proposal i A additional housing opogortuniti.es as,, p'omotad' p , bSr, ompreheris'i>pe Plan ,and` s ttes et opoli t os. ' , e o> , u Admirnistrat, , t2ule, �p,;aptee, 6604 DiilsOn. 7 p proposal would increase houiri g a C' oe tunitie . dove .opab residential l>ll adds to 16.11 da el .,ing! u l is ;per trazr ; rtes Met,ropolitan Housing :,, Rule,., 'minimum •h61.1,si.n g o p" %or Un i t y, u,r ;,units 'per acre and a 1m/nimum dam, j 1 y and multi --•Vam i 1'y , hog s i ng Planning staff has determine c ',that the proposal nsister,t wit. relevant ° portions s of the ' Comprehens:a.ve Plan based upon, thil findings noted below: Plan Policy 2.1.1 is sat i.s fed' because 'Neighborhood Planning Organization #6 and surrounding property owners .were pvern notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the, proposal. Plan Policy .6,1,1 is satisfied because ,'{ "fie pv "oposal would prtpvade 41. development and iwou Rd the opportunity for additional multi- -fa►� , increase , the net housim : „pportaunity on ouildable lands .tn. the City. This is detailed in the discussion for Goal, -10. above., The City ,of Tigard is obligated through the Metropolitan Housa.no Rule to provide. for an equal housing opportunity .mix .of singe family and multi— family units with an Overall development density of 10 units, per acre. The City . must ensure.' • that „ sufficient .higher. t- : ` density areas are available* . -so the .inter:. ,of, Housing Rul e ttan be met. The proposed r°edesignation would further the City ° s compliance with these requira #gents: Reducing the allowed der sity`. on the property, as the NPO has recommends '”, would bring the City closer to 'noncompliance Lrith the .& ®usir%g Rule equirements. Plan Policy 7.1.2 is satisfied because adequate public service capacities are available to 'serge potential development on the site at the proposed increased .deosii'ty ,as • >> indicated by the comments : of service providers.. Storm sewer and nsanitary ,sewer eat tens i on a 'poi 11 be' necessary to serve the property. This .can. 139 accomplished as a condition of developing, the 'site. . Plan• Policy' 7:6. ,1 is`' satisfied because the Tigard, School District was informed of this proposal. l Distract is presently informed �.. Ti9�' School .to .Elementary Sdhool and ,is, et'��nstrtactireg an addition the �iarha�a dement also reviewing proposed changes to s .hoof attendance boundaries These actions are r e i rt erded to iate ,, oVercr ow d in in e+i stiC! `, classrooms and to provide additional capacity to serve growth in the area. Plan City a s�af .and' d 1.1 commits the Cx" ' _ 5 . ' policy � R . plan , for efficient s� t r e e t ._.a. nd .roadway systimm tha t m eet s currant need ig s and j antrcipated future development. This p al icy would be satisfied because a dd i t ional antic ipated , traffic resulting from the incr ,sed number of dwelling units that could .be deteloped on the site Weld not cause SW NaeVe l3treet and adjadent streets to, etcme d normal traffic ieoels , for their �fu�etioha class i f ications . SW P aeve Stree &i, and SW Sunmerfield grit' i which is located to the south, are both functionally 'Class). led es . SW 109th ,AitenUe and oter, streets in minor c�:,lleotor�� the area are functionally �' ` �,ocal streets, _ o�assa��!.� as �'•' STAFF REPORT O. 89- 02/ZC' 89--0 2 (,SANDERS) — FLAG °i he app, sub'ha:ted pr~elano�rnaay` ana� 1acants h "aue, prepared �i y 'a obe t kee h and ;d�ss.ocaat s', �co �su3.��arg '�traffi `%i t 2) : r b,This analysis'. 'c ncltades .than Cher proposed engineers . (p.,:h� �.� �� ,e�d��ti�nal 32� cedes ignation wo ;cld ' be 'estpected to result �r da ` r from tae, s i te� ,beyond what wc?u ld l be .ehac�alar�� traps ��. y�' � expected un er full' ,deeeelopment' with the eliSting ;zoning. traffic analysis projects that .. 38 percent of', these tr ps or,' , 2 trips, per day would be anticipated ' to , trlavel '; sth1th and '.fast through the - S'ammerf field plahened com ;euni ty to Durham Road . The tbraeaod on analysis projects 42 'additional trips :would, travel ' westbound summerfieid Drive and 80 eads,tbcSUnd ..;trips ' on Summerfield Drive. Although i any ' additional tr o,,ff is on Summerfie,ld Drive tui 1l be of +� the potential concern to , residents of the Summer-field ;comet ani� y, �, w� traffic, eddi.ti.oreal traffic 'should not resu 1't in thi sugges t. ff ic,, exceeded . , The , �Juggested range of SW >' Sui��:erfield Drive • btding, .. r .. .traffiZ - ange of dninor collector streets, as "� specified by,' tree Transpoi- section of the comprehensive f la�� i , is up..to 3,000 tat,te�n vehicle trips per'. day. The .�.dditiofalr 'traf�fic';; t *lso should not exceed ithe 'suggested traffic' range' , foe, SW 1U hj Avenue which .is, y„ fund ortallS classified the. Plan a►f a:, locOl street., The 'P1 states that the suggested traffic raniie Of, itpproved local streets is up,; ` a 1, 51.:"0 vehicle trips p,S3r day'. Cori, adaditional 193' vehicle The traffic aro��.ysit projects ' that trips westWard on B4aaeve Street would be anticipated from fill].. development at the proposed density as .compared o full' de, *elopment at: the current density. Opportunity` ;applicable to h: Szmd ert i property. This ,additional, traffic . is 'not anticipated to resdlt in exceeding the suggested traffi0 range of SW 8 ae I Street, t a minor ooliectd►4'' sf:i�•t et, , or . 'Paci,.fic Highway whi »h is functiona iy classified as an arterial: IS noted., hob. M+ver. that any 'de Selo ament of the Sanders', property, either with the density limits of the current or .pr•oposerd ,zOhing, will, likely' 'require royementS. to . Nae ve Street off alts interim street .imp both directions as wei.l as improvements to the intersection r,� • Naeve Street and Pacific , A ►way • a t rpf ' g ation would not res{ialt a I.raffx c ranges ad jacent streets being eXceede d b . tr ► ff�l ► enerated by the addi.tiOnal dwelling units that ceuld e enveloped, and also because' the parcel ii served. by an, adequa 'e network of minor colleete; streets and aura 'ar' e ! "aa1, Play 8.1,1 would be satisfied if the proposed 'redesitn tion is approved Plan Faolx. y 8. 1.3 (kcal be satisfied as the pro e. ti cesar; any ft�t�lare deylctelop�nent of 6� p "' 9� , dedication and street improvements woU kd ,b time Y'h�� amity's �rig'ine'erih� i�avit.siorl ,� %��:'; '. Highway Di v i, s'i on will review any developtrrent Plan' ,policy $.2.2 is satisf'ied, because Tri Met 'offers bus service; on Pacific Highway less than one :+quarter° mile frow the property The L.ocational . Criteria ".specif i.ed in :Chapter 3.2 of the Plan or Medium -High' Density Residential use are ,for for fo following reasons: is within a "neveloging Area which is not The property committed to "ow density development. I I The '' ro er•ty is approximately 400 feet from the, nearest .' p p properties des ignatedl by the Plan for single family . residential use; future development on the , . site would therefore be adequately separa 3d from lose --dens i.ty development thereby mioi,mizing the potential for confl iCts . c. The parcel has direct access to Raeve .Street p a minor collector street, as well as indirect access. to Pacific Highway, an arterial streets a.5 dogignated by the Comprehensive Plan °s Tr•ansportatio ∎. Pan .Map. The parcel is less than 500 feet from Pacific `Highway. Serious development limitations affecting the site are not evident and public facilities can be extended to serve the property., e . Public transit l.'s available on Pacific Highway within a► quarter mile of the site. f. Convenience retail service is available nearby along Pacific Highway. Commercial and business centers are located approximately 0.5 to 1 'mile . from.'the parcel.. es ih I oxcess eaf . 25 I' q. Property north of the site has slopes and ,S8 of . 25' percent that Will be difficult to develop Will likely remain as private open space. 'Common open, space and recreational . facilities that cusomarily, as ^e ,provided with multi,-family deuelopment will also likely be., pisovideci as the sub),ect property is developed. No public open space is located within the vicinity of the parcel. ve a quasi—judicial amendfent to =the Plan and Zemin In order to approve q the Maps, , , a r ,� of a change in tt the City must also find th �'� there .iQ esv�i'dthe� subject pay- tc�!l� neighborhood or community which affects the City must find that there has been a= mistake or inconsistency made in the or'igihal designation of the parc,el. Volume 2 , Policy i 1 1 Implementatiob Strategll ,��omprehensive Plan, � I . Community Development Code Section +n 48,.22.O40(A)) Staff �,,,O0nesrs the applicant's assertion that a mistake was made in . des'Fg nati rig " the k Sanders', property with two �'�lan and Zoning designations splitting 4t e 'the par'j� .M: pa ally. The current split. designatiO s mace°�1 p,� eI ar�ce l long i i ud in very difficult to develop because the alloWable a sitiey f tl 'taro zones cannot be averaged over the entire parcel: "he, Staff ibelieis that it would be better, to ,+di; tribUto the Units throughou t! th+ sito 8TAFr REPORT , — CPA 8g-4)117C 'i39 -r 2 (tAND .RS) - PAGE 1 PREP STAFF REPORT ' CPA B O2 /ZC 89--0! t aANDEF ,t t 'Y O teS. _ • • ▪ + t • sa• .'=� • s - •• _s7 1 fi sr ss• - • � Y -; a i rr •: ._�s 3 r y • Y r4,,,,f`: s f • • -• r -• n • i"_ • ice r,,,4 r • !`s • • -:ra • • Y . s • •r 1.t} .- 1• • f :-='-'-' - , t 3+ s • Y `r • r •• Y ! • a + f A.• • -e r • • . 4 •,f,f r '1 • - -• li i -r 1 •.• f 9-Y i 9 ,....:_,..,.._:,..-.4._•;:- fr• -- aY if„ si -s = • !.• ••1ris a. f �• =•e4•• Y'4 •.4 '»•s•• -,.--=.-'r r••s �q,sy• s : LY •- f� J.st •: .y a • •• ♦ t ' . - - • • • f Y -1 .• . =1 r ! • f • --r • • • • ,• • • • •as s • Y t r r 'T -• r Y i r • i TY • _ ..�A.1 . • -• -• • ---„,- r • •s • • 'r - f.a t ;�:a ts- -11---. -. -•. , - Y.r 2t r 4,, 4 = ▪ .R • °► •_'. ..•4_t•4 ' ,terrw 1 r.- .!�v Ya, • .. • :. '. • • •.t •-a • -• • r j. . a 4 r • mis10•@i • j , r • w Nt4. Valt +121'11 1 CI 71 moms ®ate ,9414 11,42,41, 1.1 .Lz-1.4 t at O, mimic BEARING crios Conmaissioneri C'.asi ile favored the proposal with .conditi6nu proposed at previous 'hearing. He felt that thin wac^ ` not a normal right-Of --nay• he'. CoaunisBaoner Saporta had previously opposed the request, however, after vie tLzig tae site he felt ./pt would' be difficult t i const:xuct another type of sign. He favored the proposal with conditions previously proposed.' re Commissioners Rosborough, Leverett, an proposal. Con %Lssioner Barber and Peterson oppciued the proposal. They did feel a sign should be permitted in the public right --of- -gray. agreed and, favor the Commissioner Castile moved and Commissioner Saporta :seconded a following SCE 89-04 and V 8 �! �,�� 1 with the �ow conditions 1. The existing sign is to be removed., 2. Wile ne ii sign will be constructed as proposed. The electrical line will be moved. 4. The aiga will be subject to a license. 5. The all' plicant '.dill . obteai n a street opening Permit. 6. No freeway oviented sign' will be permitted on . the site. Motif n prised by ala;:q;z4.ty of Commissioners pree4snt. Commissioners Battler and Peterson voting no. . A 11K4 R • ' � " FexI*.est for a Coaaprehena►,ivr�� glen 7 ntial to , 1 e�lium -Hig s Density �anenda�nt from Me<.livan Deneil,".,� Reside ` l�teeidl ®ntial and! a zone Change from 11.-12 (Residential. R -25 (Residential 25 units /acre for y a. The ar aplrrOx3�nate�nei 4.27 �� idlential' and remainder of the parcel iv designated as a rn half' f i h 'Density 3ti:eet is zoned R -25. LOCATION: 11165 ati',Ti�. Naeve 2S1 10DB, eastern half of tax - lot 200) . Secior Planner Liden reviewed the proposal and anade o'caff' is recoo usndatioa f+r a oval. Adding that r sportation and PPr . it would ha�th® Suam® concern wne tai �� fo11o`ed with;' rfield. Dscuer the ®ff�ct aiteiaboregarding ry around the reoia of:the Albertsons• a d w the propertyendew s oep APPLL IT • °51 PRRSENTM IOtsi o . ' 1 ' '97002 a slai Bill San 62 Ben to Stfcet 18, 7Aurora, the r re reaert ive hac. nor akrived 1 oppn o rtuthiat y ., pe t they h�e1d 1*irchasei the fsa�c rxiea �o ba male to a a.�,. He stated tea " property in 1950 and had; ope.ates a nursery business ttnt�,l 1975 :when the State took a +sy their water rights. tlow they were ttying to ,11et the property anc findtr4 it difficult becavtee Of the epXi4: zoning. SSIaN NI OTS 4, 1.089 r MIMIC TESTIHO PTi ard, OR 97224, a Summerfield a Dave Atkinnon, 10460 SW Century Oak Drive, g resident, stated he had ben involved in the density planning process' 3: - eleven years„ His primary concern was for ` t:x affi.c. He stated, that Havre Road at 109th had ' een intended t) be block , ofi to protect the residential area of Summer.f ield. He explai n,ed that summerf ield • is unique and because of the golf c`,art traffic does not . have normal traffic patterns. He disagreed with staff's estimate regarding traffic. iHe questioned why .NPO # 6 was required to absorb the increased densities resulting from the rezoning of the Alberteone, development. Jane Miller, 10920 SW Highland„ Hi hland,� Tigard, OR 97224, agreed ` with Dave o Ai kineon and added that both she and Dave bar served on NPO # 6 when the Comprehensive Plan was first implemented. She opposed increasing density because of the traffic impact to, sum erfield.. She read a portion of a letter which directed to 'Phil Past��eris, former NPO # 6 .' had been Chairpexteon, from Randy Wooley, City Engineer, regarding traffic concerns. She read and submitted into the record a petition from the residents of the Fountains opposing the density change. O i s Planning Carmen, Lake , ,' P..�sourc ®s, 'Inc. 3681 SW • tree o Rich. Givens, ing r 97016, representing the Sanders, reviewed the proposal arid. d if f il,jcul they were encore: tering with, the split zoning. LID stated. titan t'hC fr goal was not to increase deity but to allow for homogeneous, develipponnt, The roads ar~, ..' designed tali handled the proposes d' density. He 'added Oat. the adjoining property had been purchased by a church which indicatOe that it will probably Ikle development as a ' church facility. He ,concluded • the density requestu4 to compati b1 a with the surrounding area and requested that the Planning Commission reccomend approval. �* d the Commieeion regarding , the spirt o Discussion followc�� with Staff an zoning, approval .criteria, approval based On. specific plan, and bioc;king off 109th and Reeve Road: PUBLIC BEAMENG t f the ission was to leave the zoning ae .e. Diecuse,;on, Caneeeue o e followed regarding t•he possibility of allowing the P �y sits to develo.. 1, combining the densities, which would allow 15 to 18 unites per acre for the eco®a�endation entir�'�..�eit'Ae. Discussion era the t pe '© that could 'be me,i e. f r th ra l SC: 8 seioaer Love t ®seconded to �u i endridenta f CPA 8 and 9 02 nanimouely by and recomm� - t�aotion carried u commissioners present. Commissioner Castile moved and CoMmissioner Peterson seconded to r o lend � • e .rte do to City C uncil that Dome type of method worked out to average the density and allow development of 15 unite jper acrd over tits 'entir , orit ' of Uniform development. Motion carried. by nw y Ccmmw for oners present. Commissioners Barber, RO;iborouga, and Saporta Cc�mmisui voting no. NG C7Oi ' sSI PLANNING � \ \ 1989 ERBROOK c WILLIAM & GENEVIEVE Si OMAR 15373 SW 114TH #105 TIGitIRD, OR 97224 CLYDE ROUCH 15371 SW 114TH #108 TIGARD, OR 97224 STATE, OF Or "�N County , of washinfitou ,) s Pity of, Tigard epose and say That I am a V The City, .of Tigard, Oregon. That served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING for:, That I served NOTICE OF DECISION fo City of Tigard naming Director ."""""'°Tigard naming Commission. Tigard Hear .nga Officer Tisard Ci a r; fount Hearing Notice /Notice 'o' 'Decision, gu'�Nic " ") was mailed to each na .'4edL Persons'' attached list marked exhibit "B" on dm, sa.r� f g1 notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto agOroprate bulletin board on the-- day of and deposited in the united' States Mail oa the 19 , postage prepaid. of which is Attached marked at the addras$ shown on the a� Of .. � . a posted pg.' day attache a o Person who posted.' on Bulletin 'Board Only) (For Decision Pr rson who deli. .7e t POST OFFICE Subg f ib"3d and sworn/affirm to before me on 19_; 1‘1)1 Olt My Commission, Expires: 0257P /OO66PP ti a IrkO I C8 OF' PU L =C . jta NOTICE IS BETAVIS f` GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, AT 1TS MEETING ON MONDAY, APRIL 24 1969 , AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 1:125 SW HALL BLVD., Ta. :BARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION :, FILE NO: CPA 89 -02 / 2C 89.02 NPO # 6 FILE TIC: SANDERS (Planning Resources, Inc. APPLICANTS Planning Rescources, Inc. 3681 SW Carman Drive Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: William B. Sanders 23257 Bents street Aurora, Orego,1 97002 EEQUEs ; Request for a Com rehenai re Plan Amendment from iSedl� Density Residential to iedivm-High oeneit Residential d a Zone Change from R -12 (Residential, 12 unite/acre) to R-,2 (Residential, 25 ) roximi tel 4 27 acres. remainder of the units/acre) for aPA y The parcel is designated Nediuma -High Den ©itY Residential and is zoned JR -25 Eastern WCTM 2S1 10DB, ea half of 11165 SW Reeve Street o' LOCATiOiN ;Bast � eastern half of tax lot 200). (see Nap On Revsrae side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 'PHIS RATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE `''WITS T RULES OF CHAPTER 13.32 Old THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES Or PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN C} PPTER 18.30. ANY PFp.SONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS HATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED 'INTO THE RECORD. LEASE'CONT'ACT THE CITY RECORDER OR PT .,.. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION P '� AT 639- 4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., I RRD, OREGON 07223��TMSN� dj /CPA89- 02.Da'- r RIVERA 124 fit• Itff±'111 11111; .13iU1111 ihna owl .1EEa'�11111111114121 �' `. fin �� IN auto„ TM' FOtFMTA!M2? At 'a'!6HtrariE.[ OJIDOp$NIuM3 A. ii IA CT._ S. If AVE. -.. ii 56 BE ORA,,�y PLANNING RESOURCES, INC. LAURIE" ti 360,,1 a.W. CARMEN Dtat.. LAK1; o,MG°.. OREGO 1; 9703! SUE CARVER 10155 S.W. HOODVSEW TIGARD, OREGON 97224 v, 001OQ ELBERT A. & B.E. 'CUSHION INVESTMENT, '2060 US ,BANCORP TOWER 111 S.W. 5TH AVE PORTLAND, OREGON 9/204 00300 NORTH PACIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH 925 116TH AVE. NE SUITE 221 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTCN 98804 00400 ,ROBERT LUTON P.O. BOX 8041 BLACK BUTTE, RCH OR. 97759 00500` CARL W. ETHEL V. HECTOR'' 15300 :S. W. PACIFIC HWY.' TIGARD, OREGON 97223 00900 CHARLES PECK JR. BETTY VERNE 11000 S.W. NAEVE ST. TIGARD, OREGON 97224 90000 HAYDEN CORPORATION 900 N. TOMAHAWK ISLAND DR: PORTLAND. OREGON 9/217 7217 90351 BETTY JANE MCREYNOLDS 15485 S.W. 114Th CT. TIi�ARD, OREGON 9`1224 RICHARD D. MCI4ULLEN 15485 ,SSW. 114Th (t:#3 90362;; CsERTitijDE M IBERNX 154 ;35 TXGAIID, ` .OREGfiZ1Y ' c972 • co PORN "L.: & S:A 20N 10120 S TIGARD,, OREGON 972 WILCOX YRICKSON WES' ROUTE 4:. BOX , 274 SHERWOOD, OR . ` 9714 CLNIRE , LARSoN 5485 11:4T13 'CT. Y'tARD, OREGON 97224 . R7 . V. & : :HELJN HEINEY 15485 S.W. 114TH CT. TIGARD, ,SON 97223' 'NELSON TORLEF 15485. SW 114TH CT #41 TIGARD, OREGON 97224' LIARIE A. AMACHER 15483 SN 114TH' Ct #42 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 ALFONSE & ALMA . NATALIE 15483 SW 114TH 6, #43;' TIGARD, OREGON 97224 MARY ALICE CAVAGNARO 15483 SW 114TH CT # TIGARD, OREGON 97294 CLARIBEL' STULLENBERG 15480 SW 1'14Th CT #71 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 ELAINE W #ITMAN 15448 'S1 114TI. CT TIGARD, O tEGON 97;22 ;r. 3 CO 6381; 9039 9042 90421" 90432 90442 90711 90" 21 ae A ItICI GREG 1081 IIaAR®; OREG0N , 7M: HENRY 15478 T �E I(nET; 11!4TH: REGON FLNORA PKILLIP; 15470 SW 114Th CT #76 TIGARD, ORE,; 6N ' .97224 9722 MURIEL T.00REY'' 15478 SW 114TH TIGARD, ' iOREGON 97224 JU ANITA . POUitLAND 15373 SW 114Th CT #10 TIGARD,< OREGON 97224' 075 6I 9076�. 9077 "91062 91071' ROBERT' &'. JOYCE ANDERSON 15371 ' St; 114TH CT UNST 10'7 TIGARD, OREGON "97224' 91081 CLYDE & NARY ROARK 15371 SW 114Th '.CT #108 fiTIGARD, OREGON 97224 91092 GEORGE 1'. & . SYLVIA W:Y " O lGHB'' 15371 SW SW 114TH CT #1.01,' TIGARD, OREGON . -; 972 7 cw'.1 +& 'RUTH TA iIGARD, 'ORC ►+�►�'h+ra�+i a� WWI 1 ,'SANTAER ENTS `r.. iRO] PLANNING RESOUI'±.� ES, INO LAURIE 3681 .S.W. CARMEN DR. ',AKE,OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 SUE CARVER 10155 S.W. HOODVIEW TIGA7, ,OREGON ' 97224 00100 ELBERT A. & E . E ., C 4AMIJ►N M.D.. hVERTMENT, INC • 2000 US' BANCORP ;TOWER 111' S.W. 5TH, AVE: wrr • PORTLAND, OREGON 97204'' 00300 NO RTH PACIFIC CONFERENCE OF. THE EVANGELICA , COVEKANT CHURCH '925 116TH 11VE. NE SUITE 221 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98804 00400 ROBERT 'LUTO1T P.O. BOX 80441 BLACK BUTTE, RCH OR 97759 00500 CARL W. ETHEL V. HECTOR 15300 S.W. PACIFIC HWY4 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 00900 CHARLES' PECK JR. BETTY VERNE 11000 S.W. NAEVE ST. TIGARD, OREGON 97224 90000 HAYDEN CORPORATION 900 N. TOMAY WK: ISLAND DR. PORTLAND, OREGON 97217 90351 BETTY ;7ANE MCREYNOLDS 15485 S.W. 114Th CT. TIGARD. OREGON 97224 RICHARD D: MCMULLEN 15485 S.W. 114Th CtJ #3i PI01RD, OREGON 91224 90362 EtTRUDE' M BERNIC 1'5435 TIGARD, OREGON 9'72 SMA:2 1012.0 TIGARD, OREGON 972: WILCOX' MIQ ROUTE 4 BOX' , 2` S:aER OOD, OR :97140 SON WESTERN CORD. C ,hIRE ;�ARS� N. 54 &$ TIGARD,, `OREGON 9722 HEINEY 15485 S.W. .• 114TH 'CT. TIGARD, OREGON' 97223 !' NELSON TORLEFF 15485 SW 114TH CT #41''' TIGARD, OREGON 97224 MARIE A. AMACHER 15483 SW 114TH Ct #42' TIGARD, OREGON 97224, ,ALFONSE & ALMA NATALIE 15483 SW 114TH Ct ,Q4' TIGARD. OREGON 97224 MARY ALICE CAVAGNARO 15483 SW 114TH CT # TIGARD, OREGON 97224 CLAP STULLENBERG 15480 SW 114Th CT #71 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 ELAINE WHITMAN 15478 SW' .114TH CT TIGA92b, OREGON 97224 38] 90392 90402' 9°421 90432'` 90442 907 1 9i 7 1 Pil REGO O 'Sid U4TH[ ,OT t 54780 'IGA D 2 907 ►IOLET . CHl9M RY► 14TH. CT #�t7 IREGONN ' 2, 076 EDN°HA. PHILLIPS';. 15418 SW 114Th CT' #76 TIGARD, OREGON, . 97224 9077; MURIEL T.Ce 15478 .ssr '114TH' ,' . #77 TIGARD+ OREGON 97224 91062 JUANITA BOURLAND` 15373 SW 114Th CT #106 TIGAR.D,'OREGON 97224 91071 ROBERT & JO CE ANDERSON 15371 SW 114TH CT 'UNIT ,101 TIGARD', OREGON' °97224 91!081 CLYDE & MARY` ROARK' ; 15371' SW 114Th CT #105 TIGARD, ,OREGON 97224. 91092 GEORGE F. 4 SYLVIA► MILLOUZi 15371 SW . SW 114TH •CT : #109. TIGARD, OREGON 07224 RIC1 'ARb R. .fie Ri�TH 15371 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,, ' OREGON � 97; SIB 102 o fi. co J • • ITV OF TIGARD. OREe�N �or�Praslv�.P o CDAN , GT.� /ZONE O>�.DIN�.;�CE Alm AP LICAT gor CITY OF TI2ARD`, 1125 SF1 Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 91223 (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE , ONLY 1. GENERAL INFORMATION; PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATIO North of SW Naeve St -= 450`° west of sw 89th v _ -11165 Naeve St TAX MAP 4,ND TAX 'LOT NO. 21S 10Dis part of Tax Lot 200 (east p o,rtion) ast of SW Pacific Hwy, SITE SIZE 4.27 acres Waliramm••••••=ersril `011111111A, PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* William E ..Sander s ADDRESS .23256 Bents St. ,NE PHONE CITY Aurora ZIP 97002 „_„ t4 d APPLICANT* 1�lannin� Resources � ]',�.ac. (Lr � 3681 SW Carman Dr AADRBSS PHONE 636-5422 CITY Lake Oswego ZIP 9703, ..__..__._tee *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leaaee in posseasion with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the - owner with written authorization. The owner(s) mint sign this application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application. 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners o£ record of the subject property request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (if applicable) from :MedDen.Reo Med -Hi Den.Res. and a Zone Change from R-12 . - to OR. The applicant requests an amendment to the following sections of the Comprehensive Plan or Community Development Code 0737P 23P Rev'd: 5187 CASE NO. 6 0 4 " . $ 1 - b 1 - 1-o . OTHER CASE NO'S: ,k,. RECEIPT NO.? APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: ,/ 0 'DATE: -. /6 Application elemvnta submitted: ,'"plicstion form (1) Omer ° s Signature /written: authorization L.41 Applicant's statement (p rC-a pp check list) ■`v) Filing fee ($ 7 Additional information for Compre- dive 'Plan Map Amendments/Zone Changes Maps indicatiea proverty . location (pre -app, check list. List of property owner& and addresses within 250 feet (l)`' L0,44.1—Assessor's Map (1) ......!..1kartitle transfer inatrumea't (1) DATE DETERMINED TO . HE COMPLET, FINAL DECISION DEADLINE :;�_ COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: N.P.O. Number: ' Planning Commission Approval '.Daate idirosairsimrom City' Council Approval Data: Alaµ of tine attacho once, applicklats ' 'i application,'` false. the applicant he® ' r d the enti:c7nt:tao t the policiesand criteria, and uerta da+ 'the req irements fo , eppriv or denying the appl3,,c1� ",ova above statemen e d exhibits acknowledge, ay be revoited; SIGNATURES of each owner husband and wife e eubjec Res: 003-682-1487 81.1s: (503) - 682.3771 EJ to p/ E- A to Istate Securities Brokerage-' DONALD F. MALA Q ^aker Wilsonville; OR 97070`' STATE OF 0,!�G)N •County of 14ni.1ihingtott ss.. City of ,Tiiz/Ard ) being depose and say: •1?1•?..a,s Print , 'Mat iama i1 u 'Tint City of T gard, Oregon. , . That I' ea r4et Nti)T1cca:.0? !upri7Tc, .11E041441G. for.• • , ' - • , •.. , L. ,,, . . • . • ••• • • , , , - ,,, • •,.• •••,• ,:. •:,• •., ... , ,.. ,,.•._•. ,,, . ,,,. , ,H ••; ., , • • •• , • • ., •• , ,• ,,,,, , . . • That Iae1... r e d, •i A X . ,'. OF ,.. '.Al ...,, , a, . z_. 1 o N fat ,. , . , . •, . ; .c . . ;.'.,,., . ' .. ', . , . , .4,,,..,...',.ctitir ...0i -,Tigard ,PIaititing,':1111.rector.'••• ,> •'.': ..1.',.1,..' ....:.....,,.,,.'•Tigattd.,111earing0.,'OffiCer...' ' •:•.,.',',.''•....'''''.. ' _____ ..0iti Couneli k copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decisilon) of which ji3 attached (farked Exhibit "k") was mailed to each utt.„Ited ,peraionts at the address, shown o the attached list marked exhibit "B" on the d a said notice NOTICE OF DIECISIOR as hereto appropriate bulletin board on the ay OE and depot.lted 1.n the United States Mail on the ignature 1E'ertson lab° posed on B1.1.1.1et1.1:1. B�ard (For Decision Only), erson who • eliVer 0 T1_CE 0 P I G i'$A'R ING NOi'ICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGAL PLANNING C IMISSI0N, AT YTS MEETING ON TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 1985 , AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTRE, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING ,.,: PLICAT70N FILL: NO: CPA 89 -02 / ZC 89 -02 NPO # 6 FILE TITLE: SANDERS (Planning Resources, Inc.) APPLI -T' Planning Rescourcns, Inc. 3681 SW Carman Dne ve ,,ake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: William E. Sanders ders 2'257 Bents Street Aurora, Oregon 97002 REQUEST: Request for a Comprehensive Plan AmenCment from Medium Density Residential to Medium -'i gi: Density Residential e id a !orte Change from '7-12 (Residential 12 units/sore) to E-25 (Residential, 25 units /sore) for approximately 4.27 acres. The remainder of the parcel is designated Medium -High Density Residential cAd is zoned R-25. LOCATION Eastern half of 1115 SW Native Street (WCTM 251 IOUS:. eastern half of tax lot 200) (See Map On ReVersa Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL HE CONI3UCTED IN "ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAP` 'ER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COPE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE AT L ROLES OF ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY SAUNCIa: AND AVAILAIILE A'l CITY HAL,w,, OR R PROCEDURE THIS SET FORTH IN CF1'APTER 18.30 a ANY PEI�SON3 HAVING INTEREST IN MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY BF SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD OF `.'HE; INITIAL HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 639- 4171,' TIGARD CITY HALL, 131;2b SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) t . 6 CHAIRP'RSON: SUE CARVER PHONE NUMBER: - .. 639-8507 dj /CPA89 -02.DJ c. d M TIE 0,1,..,...7ams AT TCAMF.Rrit'..0 CONDOMINIUM3 C. th 0 th CHM SUE CARVER 10155 S.W. . , HpoDvxr,W. , . . WILCOX ERICKSON WESTifiN CORP. ROUTE 4" BOX 274 SHERWOoD ' OR 97140 00100 EfiBlq11.,'„T A. & B.E. CUSHMAN M D S. INVESTMENT 2000 US BANCOP.P TOWER 111 S.W. 5TH 'AVE PORTLAND, OREGON 91!204 00300 NORTH PACIFIC CoNFEENCE 07 WIIELEDI 1.11?,INEY THE EVANGELICAL ' covENAIri 15485 SW. 114TH CT. CHURCH TIGARD, OREGON 97223 925 116TH AVE NE SUITE 221 BELLEVUE, WASH/NOTON 98804 90751 , HENRY , 11 VIOLET CHAMBERLAIN OREGON " 15478 SW 114TH , CT #71 90181 , ' CLAIRE" ' ' S'LDIOTtA PHILLIPS 5485 8,.W . 114TH CT. 15478 SW 114Th CT #76 TIGARFi, OREGON 97224 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 90392 16772 , MURIEL T COREY 15478 SW 114TH CT #77 TIGARD, 01"EGON 97224 ' 9YJ262 15373 2$ 114Th CT #106 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 00400 ROBERT LUTON P.O. BOX 8041 BLACK BUTTE, RCH OR. 97759 00500 CARL W ETHEL V HECTOR 15300 S .1'1 q PACIFIC HWY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 00402 NELSON TORLEF JUANITA BotIRLAND' 15485 SW 1.14TH CT 141 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 90421 1v1211XP; .DI'LA'1.1Elt 4141 15371 SW 114TH CT UNIT 107 TIGAKD, OREGON 97224 CHARLES PECX JR BETTY VERNE 11000 S . W . NAEVE ST TIGARD, OREGON 97224 90000 HAYDEN CORPURAT I ON 900 N °PIA-IONIC ISLAND DR P0RTLAND 0 AEGON 97217 ALFONSE & ALMA NATALIE 15483 SW 114TH Ct #43 TIGARD OREGON 97224 TIGARD, 1 OREGON 97224 90432 91081 CLYDE & „\IARY 11■DARK 15371 SW . -t4Th CT 4108 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 MARY ALICE CAVAGITARO 15483 SW 114TH CT # & TIGARD, OREGON 97224 91092 GEORGE P. & SYLVIA W1ELL000HBY 15371 SW SW 1".t.}1 CT #109 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 90351 BETTY JANE MCREYNOLDS 15485 S.W. 114Th CT. TIGARD, OREGON 97224 90362 RICHARD D & ''1ERTRUDE M. MCMULLEN 15485 S.W. 11411 ct.036 TXGARDIP OREGON 97224 REE IGA OREG'r 114TH" REGON 72: t; 9,31 5 HIC 90:94 90952 'r1ARCVS. & EVA 1ANSON 15437 'SW 114TH CT '#95 TI A D OREGON 97224 90962'. HAYDEN CORPORATION. X00 N. 11oMAH WK ISLAND DR PORTLANb, OREGON 97217 90971 MAXINE GABBY 15435 SW 114TH #97 TIGAR'S, OREGON 97224 90982 ANGELA BARNETT 15435 SW 114TH CT #99 TIGARD, OREGON 97224,' 90991 K . LOUISE JOLLY 15435 SW 114TH CT #99 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 91012 ELLINA SPYKER JANE C . SZALOBP;YT 15435 SW 114CT #101 TIGARD, OREGON 97214 91031 RACHEL KEHHM 15373 SW114TH CT #103 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 91041 GERTRUDE L. JOENS 15373 SST 114TH 4105 TIGARD, fi)RZSON 9.7224 91052 WITAJIAN. & GENEVIEVE SKYLAIR 15373 SW 114Th 0105 r' TIGARD, OREGON 97224 ITH 'MOCONNEL 5478 SSW 114TH '�; 'IGARD, .OREGON ?, 722, c�L%a�'IJM. & :MARIA ''HAAS' 15478 SW 114Th. C1: #7! TIGARD, ' OREGON 9722' 90791.' 90802.1 EDWARD 0. & .PORO'"HY'''HAYMOI' 15478 SW 1 14Th CT #80 TIGARD,. OREGON ,.97224 90811 HERMAN & HELEN BIERMAN 15432 SW 114TH #81 TIGARD, OREGON 97224, 90821 ))WARD & LINA N�"a;RVA '32 SW 114TH, ' CT #83 TIGARD, ORE k)N 97224 90832 SHARON M. TRACY 114TH CT #82 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 90642 WILLIAM H`., C +#RLOTTE BAHRENBURG 767 JOHN RIgisLI G BLVD. D SARASOTA, FL' 342'30 90851 JOSEPH H & FLORENCO. YODER 15430 SW 114Th CT 486 TIGARD, ' OitEC T)4' 97224 90861 D. ESTHER C.ARROLL 15430 SW' 144TH CT #87 TIOARD, OREGON 97224 90872 ROBERT L & MARGARET MC?ARLANE 15430 SW 144TH CT #88, TIGARD? OREGON .'97224 90882 ALICE G L KER3EL P.o BOX 2408 GEARHART, lREGON JOR tIGA R . GUNZ`3ELL REG rc�'::972'23', ELI*ZABETI, 15001SW 109TH, . TIGARD, , . OREGON 972: ERS 93 DATEt Tigard. Planning Department CPA`" 89- 02/80. 89-02 SANDED Request for'' a Cgaaprohene�ive Plan Aaitend,:aent from Medium Density Residential to.. MediumnHiigh D neity Reaidentiai and a Zone Change. frog► R-12 (Residential 12 unite /acre); to R-25 (Residential, The reaai,nder . of ; the', parcel 25 units/acre) `��for :,approximately 4s27 acr�e�e. w � ,, R =25: La ,Oleo gnated Medium -High Density 'Residential and :is, 'zoned, ' WCAT° .ON :. Eastern half of 11165 SW . B'aeve Street (WC 4 28?• ler , eastern half of tax lot 200) . Attached is the ►;bite Plana and applicant's statement for your :review. Frow inf encien and ' from other,. rmation � supplied by � ?, us� departl�ae ®ts��anau� �rec�mrena o �xrio information available to our staff, a report recommendation will be ,prepalred and a decision will be . rendered on the proposal in the near future. It you wish to consmnt on this application, need your casmente by p 1 , 1989. You may use the apace provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. o a e ab e . to rest.- b t Lei' ..:. a 'd . to F" eaa+s phone the staff contact noted below with your coMments and "Confirm your comments in l' rriting as noon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Rall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639. 4171.' STAFF CONTACT: JERRY OFFER PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOW NG ITEMS THAT APPLY: al and have no objections to its repo®, We have reviewed : the p Please context of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Conents: Name of Pereon commenting: Pho a Number: r� ^ tr d .I tu ll .ay ITT DEPARTMENTS Building ng InspectoriBrad OTIFICATION LIST FO Recorder ogineering /Garr SPECIAL DISTRICTS Fire District (' ak=up box bldg.) Bard W.D. 8841 SW Commercial Tigard,' OR 97223 • AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS 14„,4 aµ a E Al ,Wash. Co. Land Use Tramp. 130 N. First Ave. Eislwboro,..;OR 97124 Brent Curtis Kevin Martin Paula Calvin PLICATION ,moo... r Far ..„ Palic + r _...rte,. City of Beaverton x Sir Hendry PO sox 4755 - 4755 SW Griffith Beaverton, OR 97076 State g rate Hi h►ay Division Lee Gunderson PO Box 565 Beaverton, OR 97075 SPECIAL AGENCIES Genwral Telephone Ed Wilmott 12460 SW Main Ti ff rel OR 97223 ;q. ^.,,d.a.xr gar,, �1ortti rest' "Natural 'Gee .�,. *» Roudld b. nd P.olvi PE, • x;20 NW Seco A►e. { Part "l. a ws _a x 9 2O9 • ai if c orthweei ee c0251P/0021Pi Other .Recreation Board /Curti• chcol Dist., No. , 48 Joy Pahl 0, Box 200 Beaverton, OR 9707 School Dist. No. 23J '(Tigard) 131371 .SW Pac,,ific Hwy. '* Tigard, OR 97223 Metzger W.D. Beaverton) Other sr oundaty Commission 320 SW Stock Roo, 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 METRO 2000 SW let Ave. OR 97201° 5398 Portland ,, Other ,Portland General Electari ., Jim Johnson Portland' General Electric 14655 SW did 'Scholle Porry., Beaverton, OR C7OO7 et- rOpcl tah'2Aran *.400r dollar one' Twin` Oakts,::Technc)lo$Y Ce.rts r X 815. ;NW 169th a Plies, g -6020 eairettonoi OR . r. ,, .8 Other .r a• AD VALOIEN 150.1596.732.72 6040 ASSdIT 7112.455.60 NET TAX 15,6.300.101.32 35'1Ii!LOIMIT M14 4.753.277.75 4RAEiIT'TAXIS3.753.9I0.57 ROLL: 'PATKI i''LL * ROTOR COUNTY O ORDER li e0 T Y Z`51101'Mi 00700 KEY4' 00497322 VT1 t LAN. OEOR E AUDRA J014MSOKi 15380 SM ' 1:69110 AVE TIGARD OR 17223 2511008 00800 LOONC:1 MAC 3724 1,1 CO CO 37663 7 /25 PROPERTY VALUES FOR 1,00 41 DIST: 023 °74 1 100TH AVE 4 .10:00000 !fit ROLL SEA: 59055 PCAt 1012 DIsTs KEY: 004973311 CTLt2000 :15400 109YR UT1 t UT2: AREAsETIG ROLL.O LAN. BRUCE A AND JANET L OLNL94759 65685 13460 SN 10111/ ' AVE ++++++s+ TIGARD OR 17223, NAP CM'. NAP CH otoL- CON1'TROL 110D 400 -70 TO 2'3.14 1t. PRUPERTY i!g9 23.�N00 AD 'VALOREM !.D -VAL 40.300 NET TAX *ASSESSED 71.700 Cl/AENT TAX TAXAILE 71.700 10x10 4497 1.742.07 1.742.07 52.26 1.689.91; :00000 NAP, OOPR OVAL 00>SSED TAXA• BLE log4 Riot 44" 1.312;1 CODE N 070 TO 23"74 2S1100A 00900 KEY: 0497340 CV e LAN. . A JANET JOHN C 15400 SN 109TH TIGARD 2:41062 019100 Y.00tIi /;':360 CTL: ▪ 1: UT2: 01180111No ELVIS/7 A AND 1 6 *ADS INVESTMENT INC 2000 US P.ANZORP TONER 111 EN 5TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97204 2511001 00200 KEY: 00407377 CTI.TI. SANDERS. NILLIAN CLAIRE N 23256 DENTS RD NE AURORA OR 97002 PCAt SO 6'60 oci L 6 60AC SAZO E0 FARM LAND- POTENTIAL ADD T ORAL TAX LIABILITY 444.44+++1:44044A,444.44144+0 97221 C0'{ 179663 74553 NAP 2$110D TO 74 s 4: 32.800 AD VALl1REM 62.000 NET TAX 05.600 34 DISCOUNT 0 CURRENT TAX 95.600 109TNDISTi 023•7q D '.N 00000 NAP: A14TIG. ROLL SEOt ‘voS7 C. 2511011 00300 ICEY: 00437 6 • TIA PACIFIC TCMAIIGELICI' 9`5 11661'0 AVE 1ELLEVUt KAt 7002 LOC: LOT AREA7t X02 0.62AC. ABC CORR 1 LAND UT? SESS6U 24.100 *TIGRDELSN 12.300 AD VALOREM 36,400 SPEC ASSMT 36.400 NET TAX 450.16 3* DISCOUNT 2,322.76 2.322.76 69.68 2,253 06. 884.:ii 650.16 1,534.57 46.04 CURRENT TAX 1 408.53 • DELINOU`IT TAXES s*K ROLL 01:'02 5JVt00000 IOIP: NOOPR NIA+ FARM DEC 0040 11/1/ja CO 43720 14_647 .f2AC NAP 01 FROM 110D 600 *ASSESSED TAXABLE 324.x!00 'AD VALOREN 7.872./2 324.000 NET TAX 7.072012 J24.000 31 DISCOUNT 236.18 CURRENT'. TAX 7.635.96 *** DELINQUENT TAXES * ** >IIAR ACX- FOREST .. CO 3533.6 PCA: 7002 a Tl.t LOC i 0?? t AREA: X -7, CONF11 ENCE Oi*F S:67AC CQal4 ii7 • i NNE SU1 E 221 NA 00804 DUST 023 -74 D Os UAL SN MAEVE -ST 1/13687 6/10,02 SCI' -t NOOPR NILLONDROOK `TARN LOT S TBLE TY TAX LEAIILI_ NAP CH 0 CODE CHANGE =23- DIST: 023 -74 Loma JVt00000 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED RO!.L 5E0: 59060 TAXABLE. NILLONIROOK FARM LOT 9 +++++ ++++++♦4+4:++++++0+++ ROFE'0701 REC 88/89 811/08 NORTH PACIFIC CONFERENCE OF EVANGELICAL:COVENANT CHURCH 3/88 08008547 R9 3,29/88 CO 43730 1)'13,87 NAP CM FROM 2S 1101 700 CO 35336 60'100702 CODE CHANGE 23 -78 TO c3 -74 SALE 0268 88000547 V ND 0 2S110D1.O1t30 PCA :. 02 DiST: 023 -74 0 LAND QREY: - 001197395 r, CTLs LOC:1 PACIFIC NAY EN . JV:40a33 MAP: OASSIESSED UTI: UT2: AREA :ZPMY ROLL SEO1 59061 TAXABLE 1UTON. 'ROBERT .2SAC ++++aj***444+04 00 BOX 0041 IS 11027/87 CO 41731 1026007 01LAC BUTTE RCM OR 97759 AC CORR. - 12AC NMP Ji IRON 251100 800 SALE 1270 790349506 I ND • 26,:100 AD_ VALOREM 56.7!00 NE'T TAX 02.500 34 DISCOUNT 02.500 CURRENT TAX 2,004.47 2.004.4? 60.f13 1.`04.34 405.000 AD VALOREM 9.840.16 40!.000 NET TAX 9,840.16 !05,000 3% DISCOUNT 295.20 CURRENT TAX D.544.96 272,300 no VALOREM 272.300 NET THX Y7Er,'a00 • T' TAX 0.615.99 6p 515.99 198.018 6.417.51 .._,,. K�EY0A�417 4� Ci1.t�0 �� :r fro PACiFItsTlM�023 -7w 8 1. � sjM JVt 410, NAP/ % LNDIML UTIi ?.': AREAtZRMY ROLL. SE01 *ASSESSED HECTOR CARL M0FTHEL V 3975 100450004501 1 .3680: OOPR 15300 SN PACIFIC HAY_...._ T GARD ZONING VIOLATI +4++++++++ TAXAO?LE' TIGARD OR '97223 CTOR CARL NOETNEL V 02/68 8 007062 N9 °3011/ 10 2/23000 .' CO 43732 2/23%87. AC CORR; • 04AC NAP CM FROM 251100 000 SALE 0010 7000041 251106'0 00600 PTA:.. 2012 DIST: 023 -14 .0' 00FR __-- -- --.,..w.m-w.e -.� .._- .. -..+s KET: 0049 7411 CTL: L�f .i 'PACIFIC SN JV:0000 UUTT 1C y . uT?: , L SEO: 59063 ROC NR ;V E1„ cNE NIELVEN AND 1 - _. *+�+ +++*+t TTE R MEIti EIIOENE 1;4300 OR 97223 37 3GI •? /67 .� i� A. 4�t18 ... IS�F30 511 PACIFIC Mi1r' f� 437�3..2�23�b7 25 011;100 'ti ..drlla�r-M NNMi/M..rtioMl�o- ir�.�.• s1 toDe.;ra7a4 i►t�t .Z01� ' .. � .:.. 23 -7At t 148,1)00 AO VALOR!<11 3aS6.65 2,1100 NET TAX . . 3!656' .65 150,,500 31 DISCOUNT 109.70 0 CURRENT TAR 3.546.951, 51,.600 0 NAP e t �l D-VAL *ASSESSED + .. ,4+14+44444 TAXABLE -.0850 M11 5/10/88 0!300654. KE41 00497p148 CTL: sOC :15470 SM .11600000 175.300 AD ':.VALOREM 0.273.79 600 NET TAX " 4,273.79 .17,900 34 DISCOUNT 128.21 175,900 CURRENT, TAX , : 4 143.58 0** DELIMOUENT TAXES *a* P,t UT,: UT26: ROLL SEO. 598611 KIELHOI»k1 ID' ; ET AL { 14470 .PACIriC 9005 NM CORNLI.. RD 44444#4.+4+++++4s44, + CU 43766 1/13/07., PORTLAND OR 0 NIHP CM FROM 2S110D'1500 SALE 0006 12060822:. 216110/0 PCAt 1012 STs 023 =74 0 V 004!743! ' t ° LOCs 11000 NAIVE ST j41 °°1100 MAP: QOP11 IS : AREAtETIG ROLL SEO6 5 ES JR x PETTY YER!1L o+a y ++•i4 i4 4715 t ,1000 SN NAE11E ST RAP CH FiROM 2511010 1200 Cq 35336 PECK. CMARL 1.1180 �11QOd SN 67E1 LAND.,. ILDVAL SSED 4095, 500 AD '.VALOREM 1.400' NET TAX 1496.900 3* . DISCOUNT 456.!00 CURRENT TAX AM..MM- ■ 18.073.02' 12.073.02 3E2:19 11.710.83; **AASSSSE D ODE ClIA11GE 23 -75 i0 23 -74 TIGARO • OR !7224 ....: .w. a,.. a... w. �..... r...... �..,. �. �.. ��. �.,,....-.. v.. a. i.. ao--..+ w�� .w...........`- ��..a�es..«:.�: .000 AD .L'M1.0NEM 1.992433 .000 NET. TIC 1.992.33 .000 3* DISCOt1NT .77 CURRENT `M NI`` T 5 * **0 02 'to ***� !ELI Co 1 _o CD J -: X tbl1UP5 R7/1610 KEY 00497377 "fie iANDs L.YAM ! CLAI 23256E AUROITS ORA 2S110D11 00300 KEY: 00497306 CTLa UT1s LITE: NORTH PACIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE EVANGELICAL COVENANT l925E116TH AVE NE SUITE 221 BELLEVUE MA 30804 A 1032 DVS?: 023 -74 D t 11165 NAEVE ST 611 JV :00000 4 AREA: X -2 ROLL SEO:' 59859 8.27AC NILLONDROOK. FARM OT 0 FOREST POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL TAX LIABILITY II 11165- 5 SM NAEVE ST +++ +++.+++++4+ CO 43729 1/13187 MAP CH FROM 2S1101) 600 CO 35336 6/10082' CODE CHANGE 23 -70 TO t -74 t MGR As 7002 DIST. 023 -74 JVt0011o4` NPPt NOPOR A :X.2 ROLL 5E01 S9G60 NILLONBROOK FARM, LOT'! 44* • .... +..••••••a.++.+ EWE ,1170: REC OMB 11,101141 NORTH! IF IC CONFERENCE OF ► =LICAL COVENna:T CNURCN 3/08 , 547 N9 3/29009 41730 113 G? MAP CH Fg0h 1100 0 iS 6 6010002 CODE CAPAGE 2, TO 23 -74 0263 06108917 V ND 0 - ..VIMIMOIDI■- IIIM -oY -M 111.4Y •••110►• 2511010B 00400 2002 DI3Tt -74 D 1 LOC:1528�1 PACIFIC ANY JV140133 MAPt AR AsIPMf sgkt SEOt t 1 TIC:e LE KEY: 00497399 CTL, UT1: LUTON. ROBERT PO BOX 8041 SLACK ',BUTTS ACM OR 97759 ESSED TAXABLEE 1.C4C 1t 1ZAC 12710 $90301,65 1 ND 0 2S110DY °00500 KEY: 004!7402. UCT2 25000 HECTOR CART. NOETiEL V 15300 II PACIFIC ANY TIGARD OR 97223 2S110DB 00600 KEY: 004!7411 gCTT{i t ROEMER EVSEN2 MELVIN AND FAITH AN ETTE 15430 SA PACIFIC ANY TIGARD OR 97223 2S1100B 00700 KEY: 00497448 �e KIELHORM IDA N ET AL 9006 NN tORMELL 311 PORTLAND OR 2S110D! 00900 KEY: 0049739 PECX. O RRL 1111000 Six VE ST •• TIGARD OR 97224 2S110D! 90000 REEIa '01414222: CTLT2 ORPORAT HADEN 900 TON ISLAND 110 PORTLAND OR 972217 25110D! 90351 KEY: ,01414231 .011.1 UTi i . UT!. i CROS SLD114TKM. CT JANE TIGARD OR,57224 41731 PCA. 112 DIST: 023-74 D LOC.153300 PACIFIC NAY CU AREA:IPNV ROU. SEO: Ti1 �' N397 100450000p0L4p5001659 1ECTTOOR 'ARL M/ETAELIVrI 10 172' A - tll4AE 0000 ie000tils OD 800 26.300 'AD VALOAEM 56.200 NET TAX 02.500 3% DISCOUNT 500 CIPRLNI TAx 2.004.47 2.004.47 60.15 1.5.4.3M 40.000 AD VALOREM N, 405.000 NET TAX 9.040.16 840 .16 405,000 34 DISCOUNT 295.20 CPMT TAX 9. 5411.96 .300 AD VALOREM 6.615 99 .300 PET TAX 6,61599 272.300 3t DISCOUNT: y�e.48 CURRENT TAX 6.417.x1 114509 OOPR ++++ 0'2088 0800 N9 3011000 73732 t2 7 RAP CA FRON 1100 900 VOPOlont 140.100 AD VALOREM MID D- VA`.. 2.40 ; NET TAX *ASSESSI!D (0.500 34 DISCOUNT 0 GWENT TAX AlMl1./:' 1508 SOO 3rdS6.65 3.656.65 109.70 3.546.95 LOOCC:15430 PACIFD 9R CO4 0V -74 l t;EO a ` Ltal4N1100000 NAP. NOOPR girls +44++++++ ;MEEK M i FAITH A 41708 88016850 All 5010088 223087 AC CORR . 04AC 251100 '1000 SALE 0000 X9300654 LOCI '' °11tACIF FST: 023 -?4 SIDI' JV :00000 NAP' (111311R ROLL SEOt 4.55AC 15170 SM P1k;IFIC 43736 1013087 MAP CM FRON 251100 1500 0000 12060022 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023 -74 D 3 000 NAP: o `OCt11000 NAEVE ST S J1it00 'AR;�EtIG ROLL SEOt .+44" - - :.i 14 col13135�"1/1 7 Tim MAP CH FROM 2S110D 1200 CO 35336 6010082 CODE CHANGE 2"3 -78 TO 23-'74 PCAa 9902 'LIST: 023' -74 �...�... AREA:0101 091. 0: _ 598�uNt NAP: FOUNTAINS AT MELD FMASE S CONNID I QpENT SALE 0000 CON0733 *ASSESSED TAXAILE 173,300 AD VALO Ep t.273. 600 NET TAX 4,,173. .900 311 DISCO NI 129.21 1 0 CURRENT TAX 4.145.56 Rte DELINQUENT TAXES *** 495.4100 0 50 rD • 0 1. NET 496,900 33 DI. 456.900 CURRENT 120073.02 12.073.02 362.19 11.710.03 2S110D! .90362 KEY :' 01414240. 0Cit. MCMULLEN. RICH RD ED AND GERTRUDE N 'sites sN -114TH CT 836 :10200 AD VALOREM 992.33 54.300 NET TAX 1 X33 67,000 3% DI P 59.33 0 CURREELNT " 1 932.56 02.001 0411 O1 TAX 1I EPIT TM S *5* t 1912 DIST 023-74 FOUNTAINS AT ROLL SEC: 691167 1t I t SUNNERFIELI PHASE_ ! IT 31S +444.014 ACRE�DS .: JANE 120K-86059217 M7 105007 SHE 1201 86059217 I N O R PCAt'1912 DIST. 023-74 Loci *IV: MAP: AREA:910101 51060. FOUNTAINS _ AT RFIE D PHASE 5 UNfl 36 M+44$+4++44++4++$i+++4++++ R MCAULLEN. DOG M! 12086- 86051777 N6 12/18/86. SALE .108f .86051777 I ND - TRNAILE i6.fo0 no VALOREM 1„618.16 66,600 NET TAX 1,610.16. 66.100 34 DISCOWIT 40.54 CURRENT TAX 1369.62 *ASSESSED (9 2200 NET NET TAXAILE 6!.200 3%. DISCOUNT CURRENT TAX OXtitustns EXtt :XXXXRNXXummi4tNXi ;KOsursMk t #XXRmshtususs7tXSXXItXltitiXtXSNlttht .: _. nsXnnitVm'Rm�l�muit004X4X00" 1.01.32 1.681.32 50:44 1.630.!18 IR5 -01 11671i8260.00 SS76 AS.700 473 600 SP-FEAT 00 .4 500 '61311.00 RASE � x�ti1 0 LASE -06 616534.00 LASE -07 .00 DASE10 AD 4MILOAE" 150.7536309.97 , � : '� 31, � . � .00 SPEC b .7r NET I F 't DISCOUNT 4;756.!94' S5 CURRENT TAX1S3.N0l1.421.10 J' 14 N NL i PARCEL E �C Q1 NURSER ORDER COUNTY ' TIGARD 90362 OR 77mr. 2611011D 917 KEY: 014.14 C'TL.: L REOFIELD..'N KERIIICCEt 15485 iN 114Th COURT A37 TIGARD OR 97224 P1101PE0TY 'VIN.IIES FOR 1910 -!! ROLL- t,'ON`TN CONTIPNMTIOM r 1912 DIST, 123 -'T4 � x JYi 1lRe.ML+l101 .4:4 444 4+4 NEDFE L " 1lEDFIELI 12/06- 060SO4 s , N' Y 1001040 MICE "MOO WOMEN ., 1 j691 Mil' 0.7t 600 ••TAX., 1.691.05. 211.1100 0 ii 73 r 32 AS0., MIND 1U J • SC▪ $UETI, PLUME/ AND MINA 210:'- 131!ST. ' `SURREY° DC CANADDAA1 2S110AC 00600. KEY: 004017/0 CTIs OT1 c . UT?: P ETERSON JOAN LOSNAROM STOKKE. autuLE 24 CANTER LANE SMERN00D OR 571110 3s 7 I�Z /OFE CO. �ETZ„ 030 PCA: 1002 LOCI AREAsPC N .S4AC.Iy r".•1 . 7000 pia PETERSEN. �,: 3�{�xI 40 SHARON N '10120SN KENT $01, 0✓A•OG r! ' 110 04/05-z, am 261,10A ,43 0 ' �,. .... �,' �•••,� - . � ' �w. �s�eia/ A�wrr� +�/!r�!'nri.r�w�,wr�tryw.�� w+�ar�,fr•w r• ®L1iT L$9!)'. 9.000 All %NILSEN 110.67 MI6 EV.71 T TP , 4.751 Zs, is AIs000,0 s .,r, u r "Es ED ' !.000 ET ; TAX . 210`. !45 �' MILE 9.000 '3% DISCOUNT f;.56 , stI` 1•17-43 C1110ENT TAX 212.11 EFROM mit woz i.t NI 0/020310 V 19C 0 PCA: 1012 asT: 023 Ipc114,40 PRC!F CHMV 40$00000 NA1,: ,NOOPR 010 J2 AREAaPCOi 1 SEOs TA PETERSEN, E %VM L N 9007 070. 17 N5 1109 IdTi W GANG ,251/00.4. OR 97 224 TIGARD SIR . ;0000 $10127101 -17-03 "11 1 SOOT SH 1009TN TIGARD 2 I IOAC 01 KEY: 0040071 CTL:_ OEITZ S MI ; ` AND NATALIE � BO e!! ERs 1012 LIST: ,123 -� 1., 4.00 sTIGADELSN 40.32 1 .000 AD 17 .OSEN 118.41, ,100 NET TAX • ∎5$.7733; 4,1.32 3% DISCOUNT 20.76' (MOMENT TAX 920.97 sat DELINQUENT ~:*S *0* 24.00 AD VAL ' 033.79 s LOC:14900 PACIR C WWI c AREA:PC46 A : �TENN C 0UI 7ifK fru "" 091OS72 OR ,!'740 OR 77023 ammomoOmmogh, M aIVs00000 NAP MOOPA ZONE $ 01249 ACA1 9 q02 PISTs $23-74 �A� .Acr'Ii i moc ROD■ TIONlN. TRX Liman'? SALT 0000 000,145, I JVsSAMOA NAP :IICOPR' • PO EI1TIlr�. I 4221. AREA: X - ?POLL 1 115411 OE0:11D c 7012 1116112 023•74 427AC 12,04 �- ` 04040037 See LESS .O AC TO ROB MCCU LLOCIVIERING 1tgNST co 37233 1.17 -03 SALE 1104 Oc!040©37 I IUD 0 lJYe00000 IPs $0007 I ! NATALIE' -134000 1 07,04. !� •I0I5S! S 1MC CMIG, RRON ZS110A 0.400 WET � ��TAX O I.71 .0100 DISCOUNT ''307 41.400 TAXY.72` 700 AD VALOREM 700 NET TAX 100 3% TAIL 16.99 1i.. 15.40 . mCT.DE►,SM 49221.20 .400 AD YM LOR► "M 72.6SO.e5 •400 SPEC ASSAY 4- 221.20 .4¢0 NET TAX ,,0"!0.13 0.' 1.20 3% DISCOUNT 2,306.34 G RE$T 'TAX 74 5'11.79 *0* DELINQUENT 'TAXES' *1* 2S110AC 01100 KEY: 00409609 C1Ls_ H ATT. RODERT C P 0 BOX 3521 SIN! VALLEY : 2012 DIST: 023-7/ t A3 L 11 -234 M1!1 "NT RD �I,__JVa!�9142 070,64 7;PNY POLL �c Spa AAP IRON 16110A 3001 „PISTI 023 -74 MOLL SEMa 111"!, ZONE s I" 23sv�o CA 03063 251104C 01200 PCA: 2002 KEY: 00409670 Clips AREA: �'TT RODERT C i 4.14AC P. 0 NUX `357,'1 . SAr4 0571 SINI VALLEV CA 1,311a a NOMA IUDIIMfT TAXAILE t 71 S I1D 25110AC 01300 PCAi 2012 oil, • 0100!"31 UTZTZ: s ANEAsIPMY ANDERSON. FREDERICK A 11550 GM DULL NT RD TIGARD OR 4 NI 000it195 PE TO SALE 0979 01060964'I CT IMMa 1100PR W1 NDOPA LEGAL 2S110AC 01400 ost pi�f�0: . 1002 • KEY: 70 a LOCs 11430 DULL DULL RD 004 09 5 CTL UT 1 a UT2: AREA :IPNY ROLL REO ANDERSON, PHYLLIS M 04AC. 11540 SR DULL MOUNTAIN AOA 1, E $701 ROede TIGARD OR 972240 1 • . 15001503 NAP CANE, FROM #ON><` :10 10th* #OrtOSl **att t0#�t ***** n0 /115 NARNET SVDb 746 0017 I ARKET 1490 `74$ BASE -01 Sk•3S703100.00 •OT 1�0 1040.06,. .. s10534:00 °0 AD VALOREM 140,905.2%.00 C'ASSNT V3` 011ie, ONOEI SON'. 3000 . E0 .I1 -104: . LAND l 21S, ., 00 a!3 1132 7s 091,1:72 GO r TAR' 1Giii 770.5 20.100 STECRDEI.'.�,`II 1170.64 11!.000 AD VALmEN 0.442.01 347.900 SPEC ASSMT 070.64 7 !00 NET TAX 9.331,45 070 A4 TAX 270.94 TAX 5,051.51 wo.ee0 A0.IINILOREMI 10.'!52.!5 'SD 450.000 NET TAX 109952.95 TAXADLE 4509000 3% DISCOUNT 328.19 A I1T TAR '00.624.3g X10 - 11.100 A® VALOREM 1.350.37 ILb4'AL .200 NET TAE 19350.37 *ASSESSED .300 3% DISCOUNT 40.31' TADUADLE 31.300 CURRENT TAX 1.30l.Oi NAP: 'J IS 0.11.17-03 nemsrammrsinsinnusurnmannmunnumuj 1!7.'!00 AD. VALOREM 4.663.92 157.100 PET TAX 4.5030 1' 197.900 31 ..iCOUNT CI LENT TAX 49440.21 4 3 BLS PARCEL i COUNTY 219eAC 01100 PIIOPER'TY PSI �! LEOIMI, COMTIIisT CTION SEED FOR 0001 l llC FROM 1L;;Nei ON N! girt 4 0111 6 3573 530 000 SPAT 33Si.� 111TiE -904 !7003000. �e 4297,725.42 �NT TAXIS1.091,0Si.10 � do as11e'k 111500 KEY: 10s096S2 230!410 LOCe SS t iLL. it coCRMt, !I' ':ICU , `HELM L store 77156 -001' t1455 SO -MULL NT .RID SALE 0000 /0410023 TIGARD ON rn23 '.. en. a 1 NNP 011PR 03%1/01 ,! '' 44 v toirm 2,445.31'; NET TAX 1.44!05» 3: MIl;COli6i' _ _72.10 • :1g T p 110TH COINlT S OR 972 11000 "4311ror Ffil i CTI:t II128 LARSEN. CLAIRE 5083 SN 114TH CT `M30 TIGGAD 01 97224 251,0 %000 1E1i Y. J V IIT3a NEINEY HELEN 15485 114TH CT 97221 126110 D KEY., 11 1 ELt ON TONLEP TI D 1 114TH OR 997224 w6.t. • '014 11 ` i .NSon PAL L101Al.OTT! 1583 "�11 114TH CT 1141 TItD ON 94 rvun n.ow n■ i.n.ww.. .w 1216 - '%)0072 MG 12 #1146 s .012 DIST, 0033 -74 eFO TAINSS1 p AT SUN RFIELD 12• /87 0706347; N7 1010,00 REOFIELE N SALE 1Q i e6 00 Y 59874 W' 119.,1 CLAIIT 30 7 87063347 I ND 0 14 nw Unil 00707 ..W7 ral . '` .700 0 VALOREP 1.0'0.09 .700 VET TAT 1.640.05 ►.::- DISCOUNT 09.35 CURRENT TM; 1.395.34 111 1912 DISTa 023'74 tit AREA:9101 ROLL SEO: FOUNTAINS AT SUNNERF1ELD 12/06 - 86055647 N6 1218086 J: NAPS •PNASE S UNIT 39 PN INEY. J #SE HEY HELEN TALE 1186 86055647°I NO 0 8l 728500 . 00 Ip V1AXr 1,761.52 TAXAILiE 72.560 DISCOUNT 52.05 CUN2ENT TAX 1.708.67 PCPs 1912 81ST. 0231-74 LOC, ASEAs9101 ROLL Oa 19072 irATt FOUNTAINS AT RFIELD 5 IT 4i ++4+4+ liEL TORLEF 12086486054960 N6 12018/86 a�"1106 86094950 I UD 0 PLO4VA . 708%00 Al) VALOREM 18712.92, Mi'"S 7x!.500 NET TAX 1,712.92 T1DPILE, 70.500 3% DISCOUNT 51' .39 1.661.53 'U�TI � + 14�l63 unit 04 ANACNER MARIE A TIGARD 1114Ti1 CTONN 2 ,25110DD. 1432 • t' I$ 4 ;�,1 t YT I t •. i t NATALIE, A .FONSE0A6NA 1: 15403 SN 110TH CT 043 TIGARD OR 9722 '2511 aDl ,00W 2• K EY, t 0103!3 , TL i UT1s 140; . T2 sa 1 CAVAGNARO. NARY ALICE a 1912 DIST: 023 -74 1 a AREAL 102 ROLL liels FOUNTAINS T. FIELD IH1+++4+*++1. NINSOR. PAUL L,CANDLOTTE JOLLY K ISE SALE i2ee . eaooir465 I 'ND • as 11 59073 11.1 D BE 6 UNIT 41 12 60 OCAa 1012 0101 023-74 03000 00000461_113 3029000 2187 • 0700967 N10'407107 I D-1AL TII'A CJIRENT TAX oatormaracies■ mew, 71.000 AD V PAREN 1.7014.51 71.000 NET TAX 1.700.51 71.000 3% DISCI70AIT ST.3 CURRENT TAX 1.672.17 OLD -VAL LOCI FOUNTAINS ROLL SEOs 57874 NW's : t VETS FOUNT IELD - R4 g WI 42 TAXFOLE 11• 007 07057763:`16 1203007 SALE 1107 07057763 ND 11 PCA, 1912 DIST!? 023 -74 Lott AREAt91.01 ROLL SKI JVt NAP. FOUNTAINS AT SUMN INFIELD ClAIDO PHASE 6 UNIT 43 ++4. NAYALIEx 6LFONSE/ALNA L 11• 00 • 07 04903 N10 4'7,87 SALE 01b? 07V014903 I ND 0 64.400 AD VALOREM 1.431.00 `S.01i0 NET TAX 1.431.08 ;x.500 3i . SC.300 C00T► ISNT ACOIX 1.06..93 IMMO TAXRIL'► PCA, 1912 DIET s 03-74 LOCI AREA i 9101 ROLL SEO s 59076•IV t K 14 NAP. FOUNTAINS AT'SUNNERFIELD CONDO PHASES UNIT 44 744.000 AD VALOREM 1.017.39 74.000 NET TAX 10017.39 74.000 3* DISCOUNT 64.52 CURRENT TAX 1.762.87' ILD -VAL 69.00b AD VALOREM 1.676.48, *ASSESSED 69.000 NET TAX 1.676.48 TAXABLE 69.000 3* DISCOUNT 50.29 CURRENT TAX 1.626.19 15403 D SA 114TH CT TIGAR 4++++++4+++++++ . NARY ALICE 247 - 07006501 N10 4,7/87' ; E 0207; 87006501 1 110 0 si®o�tr ter.! 2511800 90711 ACA. 1913 DIST. 023 -74 8 KEYt U TI t ' 0145/123 CTLs LOCI JVs� MAPS ' UT2t AREAe9101 ROLL SEOs 59077 S 'ULLSNIERG CLARIDEL C -• -- • -- -. _...- .....,.. ...w . +++.444++++4+++.4.4.444++++ STULLENPERG ARIIEE S TIGARIJ .OR 97223 07,07 07039576 06 12011007 SALE 0787:030576 I ND 0 MM. M.-.-. .MI.niamM..er.INO- YIM'.IOm.N.O.R... v, 4561:1 'c1�,t Ut a CITtt NHITN N. ELAIN 15478 SN f 14T1! CV TIGARD OR 971414 LUCr� 101 Tt 023 -74 Jyt : t 912 D FOUNTAINS IELD PHASE 11 IT 72 NS . AT SLMI�RF Oil ITNAN • ELAN 9▪ 4997 87045191 M6 12/11007 SALE 07- 07 0704 199 2 NA 1 ILD -VAL i Zc 900' AD VALOREM *ASSESSED 66.100 NET TAX TAXABLE 660900 3* DISCOUNT CURRENT TAX 1.625.04 1.6.15.04 48.76 1,576.68 Mme ILD-siA% VETERAN 69.900 AD VALOREM 698900' NET. TAX 78500 3%.DI! .r""+ T 42.400 CURRENT TAX 1.506.11' 1.516.11 45.48 1.470.63 PSI Isa 73i: PC:An 1911 1ISTi 023 -74 0 K Evii,1436,41 . CTLi4000 LOCI .04 NAPt UT1 s UT2i.. AREAt9101 R011 'SEOi 59079. GUSE. PATRICIA AtCMARLE�S : 8134174810444000073033 FOUNTAINS AT.SINERFIEELD 15400.5$ 114TH CT. 1171 .. PHASE 11, UNIT 73 44+44+++ ++++ TIGARD OR 97223 5USE. PATR?CIA Ai'CHA .E RLES 119007'87049222 N6 120110 SALE 0,07 07049222 I ND 0 KE'�. 014 !30 CTLu 5000 Lott IMIEl1 :9101 ROLI. t r 3'. _... 201/0 . Jlit NAP ��,SESSED, U � UT2 �� 1911 82STa�002� 744!(/"!0 T.rr7KAILE TYLER. Mott V. 1I M8306 3194406 FOUNTAINS , AT 6lM111E1e IELD 11TH 1074 PHASE 11 UNIT 74 ��+++++++++++++++++ +++444+4+.+ D OR 97223 TVLER ROSE V,. 00��0T 87042099 N6 12011,07' TIttA1d SINE 0687 07042099 I AO 0 2011000 90701 PCAs 1912 IISTa 023-74 0 •,169 CTLI LOCI .. �JVi MADI lLEYo 0145;/ UT1e .LT2t 10EAt9101 ROLL 6E01 CHRMAERLIN..:HENRY'VIOLET E 12 UNIT .75. . FOUNTAINS AT 5LJl�ERFIELD S!! 15478. SM 114TH CT. 175. ++++4+4+++4++++++ *++44+4+*+ CIOMIDERLIW. `IENRY,VIOLET E TIGARD OR 97224 1247 117012S99 117 1v6JI8 .. BERLIN .HENRY4 OLET.E, .. -:... _ O00R7 67043061, N6 12111,07 SALE 0087 43541...,.. 200`1000 90`41 • P,CAt 1,12 11ISTt 01'74 D U T9 01456178 .. CT!• a LOCI ARE9a9t01 PALL :5E0: 59802. i MlIPt Urli PHILLIPS: 70 N 210TH ,t 176. + + 4, S+ ++ 1 + +'1 12 UNIT Iii ELMORA FOUNTfiANS_ AT. SUNNERFIEL:O, PHASE . LLIPS TIGARD `OA 04 ....... 2, 100 7050041. 1110 2S11Oo9 b0 t !'CAL 1912 1ISTa 023474 0 /calf 01456 _ : e .. . ., ... JV ARFr4i t NAM. 4+ r r OREY-' .IEARIEL .T. LOCI' 1101 ROLL GEOL.' 5!803 . , � '' IT 1 ? CTLt �+ 12 UT1 ti, !Op 91.,,M AIMS AT 1mE'IFIELD, .; 15078:_ sot 1147N CT . 017 444444*++4�i4444+++++4+4444 COREY.. NURIEL Telen ti ., no 0*.i. 4'' f11A'!erret 5Il i s of Y aA't: p.j r whn.4 n•14.4a444 • iv*, r 1V.tiii 69.700 AD VALOREM 0,750 NET TAX .700 3% VISCOIXT CURRENT TAX 1.6,3.48 1.693.40 50.00 1,02.60 .700 AD NMM.OREl1 1.766.3!' .700 NET TAX. 18766.39 .700 30 DISCOUNT 52.99 CURRENT TAX 10719.40 E6.900 AD VALOREM 1.525.44 *ASSESSED 66.900 NET TAX . 1.625.44 TAXABLE 66,900 3* DISCOUNT 40.76 CURRENT TAX 1.375.60 40.0Ou 06 VllLOREM moss asset 69.900 NET TAX 18691".34' TAX►4r .E 0.900 74 1 DISCOUNT 50.95 C1MlQEiIT TAH . 1.847.39 0.700 'AD ,VIILOREII 1.693.40 Pi!V' NET ,TAX . /0 p3.40 1.02.60 ), TIGARD OR 172/4'' 3' • GV0O0 7 N9 3#29 l $ LE Z20V 011~67 I IA °•••"' ®10' 0 AD RA ER l YK9.94 2ST10DD 911101 PCA: 1112 �I5Tt 023.74 UT': 01471455 C L: HAYDEN RATION PORTLAND 97217 O7 tsl lei B! 9111 12 KEY: 01471164 t UT', ILLINA 1535 51 11'411 CT 0101 TIGARD OR 9712% 25110D$ 91022 KETY: �_e_�1471473 �, Q o HAYDEN CORFORAT 900 A TONANANK I SLAND OR PORTLAND OR 17217 2511010 11031 KEY: 01471402 C : UTI KENN. RACHEL 15373 tH 1141,A T 410 TIGARD OR 97art4 2511010 91141 K1 '014711111 1 L: OENSES, �.: ' 114TH TC1611 TIGARD 2511010 910 KEY: 01471 0111.: 1'YNAR : ILLIAM 1 6E R 1!63 5N 111TH 1105 TIGARD OR 97224 � OAS Ct AREA:1101 ROLL SE0: .IUt 1[M► t FOUNTAINS AT susO oFIEL�V CONDO POSE 16 OMIT 100 MALE 0000 CONDOMS ' 4 : 1912 DIST: 02374 JU1t _ RHEAt91O1 NOLL 9EOt 51907 Allis AT SUNNERFIELD 111110 PMATE 16 UNIT 1 4t 1912 ARE11t9101 - 4UNTAI'ie AT Of SALE 0000 COMi X00 IliT1 023' 0: as 1,1 ROSE 16 UNIT 102 t 1112 DIST ,REA:9101 P0UNTAINS ISM 1111 x.. lthei01.w40+* ILO C ty� , 1112 61,40 11401 0 PCA: 2 DIST: 023-74 o190 01,504 NET TAX 67s500 ATNT A& 1,469.94 1.425. 79.100 AD W0LO401 1,!1.07 79.100 NET TAX 1.921 :517 71.100 3% DISCOUNT 57.66' C7 KT' TAX 1.164.21 000 AD VALOREM .000 :000000 % DISCOUNT &MAW TAX, TAX/VILE 17 11NIT 1113 111 I s MAP: A11EAt91e1 Ra1.L 0i 119518N DO AIMS AT MELD PRASE 17 SNIT 114 0 .. 0e010056 NII St12,10 SPrLE 201 UNDO 1 1912 1157' 023.74 JO t IMMr NASSEScED lA:9101 ROLL SEGt $9111 TAXASLE FOUNTAINS AT FIELD PIASE 17 UNIT 105 I�WAR 'K!LL AN AND OENSPIEDg R 12107 01060059 N7 1029 DALE 1207 07060051 : ND 0 NASSE TAXABLE 22511081 :11102, PCP: 1112 0157: 023 -74 UT1: UT2: APEA:9101 ROLL 1E01 '6991 SOURLAND, JJU AmITArLo LOC: AIIIS AT SuNNERFIELD 15373 EN 114711 CT A106 44.+444+44.444.+44+4+,4444+ ITA TIGARD OR '17224 12/A7 ®70603!1 N7 10111,00 SALE 1Z ! 60391 1 NO 0 72.100 AO CAA•OREII 72.100 NET . TAX 72,110 ANT TAX 1,530.68 I.53eJ'0 45.92 1.1.7, 1.751.77 1,751.77 52.55 V.69'3.22 66,900 00 YIO..OROI 1.6225.441 56.900 NET ` TAX 1.625.44 4116.100 3RRE$T0UNT CURRENT TAX 1,576.65 .100 AD 101.0011 00 NET TAX' 7S. . 3O DISCOUNT TAX 1,024.68 1,021.69 54.74 1.759.14 D D-VA .6 1,700 00 YALOREN 1,693.48 NAP: % %ASSESSED A9.700 98:1 TAX 1.613:40 Aa�r.600 � DI ,,5209117 50.86 PHASE 17 11117 106 6 n TAX 1,646'.X.8 p•.MM ....-../MMY. **** **45*** *113** *511 t*********lt4 *** *4145 rt MARKET S5r 720.300 MARKET 5379 6120, 300 LANE' SASE -01 55's 300.00 .0ASE -02 6�lIS96.00 VASE -03 OASE-06 16534.00 VA;E•07 Oo DASE •00 AD VALOREM 160: 7.4,65.03 OPEC ASST 700t3.105.7, NET TAX' * *Z** 1/411 172 140 DLO '.1631 21110 SP -FEAT 11,395;.00 1RSL -04, 36136.00 VASE -05 0761 5.00 � p� 130.5110.571 eh9 DIE9O IT 4,759.#11!19 CUIRENT TAXIS3.0e1.35?. 40 s 1S MILLI PARCEL K P gMTY PROPERTY WLIES P00 1100-11 25110$.91071 1112 023.74 UT1 014 71525 CTL 5000 i i 1 . rIV: WP • 1 i UT2k, AREA:910 . _. _ HOrNDERS.��. ROE497 D AND MLN24S6 , �IgsAT i1RFIELD. Y 1 CONDO'. ;P14011.' 10 . IT 107 +++. JOYCE 1MIIT 107 HENDERSON, RODERT ON T 7,011 • WESERO Ml 7/21,00 15371 5M II�TM CT .UNIT 97224 . 629 I N� • SALE Ogee 2- 11010..11001 PCA: 1912 DIET. 023 -74 JO: OMMr UTI * 01'/71534 ' UUT2: LOC :. :1101 ROLL .SE'ai 571111 . ROAIN. CLTDE..S RY FOUNTAINS AT SUNNERFIELD.. _ P 0I1E..1 1 1IY tor'. 15371 51 114TH CT 9100 k++++4++•++ YDE SiRMRY TYGARA ` 0R ' 722'1 12 7 07061039 N7' 1,296111 GALE...1257 07061039 I NO 0 2511001.,11091! PCAi 1912 1157: 02--3 7�1 KEY: 01471513 t LOCI UJTt i RF'IELD .9�C10! ..MMSE i•. .. gNIT .109 NILLY. GEORGE' F AND FOUNTAINS AT TiUOO SYLVI�A R 44+444 ++++4++ NILI.OUGHDY . SEORGE F 01. iN.: 0184 0!002911 I ND 'O 00006'911 N0 2,50'1!5 .15371 .� 114TH CE 2t03 1►i''urlA R r TI6AR0 aR97��!. , 1 �r'11004,11102 PCP: 1112 5I57: 0'93°74 i '0l /Isoe'._ CT2t LOCI ��r IMP: . CT L: ;. FOUNTAINS le40 16 - �. NIT �110R ..;.RNE .. K 111 Ably+ +u +$+1+►++++ 11�. 9 .. .� T KRUTII N 12�e�'�7o61e�e � �tIT Ile TA1�1. 1 153311,.511 11'ITIi CT.1,�i110 1407 07061.311 I Kb 1 TIGARD REAL PRi>PERT'Y 1e,1S45 P011 1101 65,900 AD MNLOOEN 1.625:44 SASSFSSED :100 NET TAX:.. 1.625.44 66 TAXAILL .900 INAPOLAT DISO.. 1.576.60 110 72,100 NO VMM•O11E$ 7�'.IE0' NET TAX. _. 72, 100 31 DISCOUNT A,11T AX AD s SEp i 700 11XAA /UL. E EDT 10. 000 af DISCOUNT T 59.700 OS AIENT TAR 2751.77 1,741.° Sx.55� 1,695;22 1:454:52 1450.52 43.52 I.S47 00 4 .144 AO I�.AUd1 1:1124.60 .100 PET TAX 10024 600 3 ;DI. 75� 100 1ENT 1'A 1.761414 • �vt c 11iTtt; .. ..:z. , , 1111 NT& WILSON. PHYLLIS A 3470 SM ARRON100D LAM! t 07225 i Yt ,1f UT1't 4172: SCHICK. HAROLD R JR'AND 1543? 3,701 110TH CT '103 TIGARD OR 97224 �M�MitlGlr'.N 1111 2S1.10D1. 9.941 *Yy 51146356. "'ICUs IiTI't LEVIN. O It UT2t OPS! 1 ,11I 1912 ESTt •23-74 AREA: R914„ 1101 5 9 8 9 8 ' 1D/P1 POUNTAI ELD 11 14 92 V0/87 52206 MS 1211 ' S507 87036 I MO PCOt rf 1912 DIST' 023 -74 .rill NAP: �""-- AREA i 9101 ROLL, SEEG: $3099 FOUNTAINS AT srONNE IELD MBE IS UNIT ST ++44•'4+++4+++ SCHICK. IMRIOLD R i INEustI .0 6 80026694 M1 7 #13408 SALE 8688 89026691 I NO 11 SSED 10..7700 NETV AX 69.700.31 DISCOUNT CURRENT TAX 1.693. '.8 50.0 1.0*2.R® TAXABLE *ASSiSgE9 75.500 AD VALOR!.! 716500 NET TAX 75.300 34 DISCOUNT CURRENT TAX 1.83'1.▪ 4!1 1.034.40 55.03 1,779.37 KAt 1912 DIISTs orrek D 1.7C° AREAt9 101 661 0t X0'1!1° Oft F +IT_INS AT MELD IMIIISE at_ 1UNIT 94 15437 SN 1141'A CT' 1197 4444++++ TY6ARD . OR 97224 � 88022358 N12 6#1048 =R18 �0223S6a I ND 0 DLD" VAI. 60.500 AD VALOREM *ASSESSED 60.500 NET TAX TAXABLE 60.500 3% DISCOUNT CURSENT TAX 25110» !'C4: 1912 DIS T 023..4 D Fill 4!4 6 e L'...:01 Jilt OAPs 16h a', "" .. UT21 AREA :9101 ILL 6EQt 19901 0101500 NRRCLIS AvEVA NAME FOUNTAINS AT MiN IELII PHASE AS UNIT CIE TIt ist37 II 1 11kTMNCT N95 40+4.++4+++ ..OR '0727 gEiDT 1170631600 Hit 1/18088 STALE 1987 trrons30 I NO 0 2811000 5 t 1912 DI5T, 02174 D REV $116 CTLt L. JV NA't 900 N HAYDEN TONAMAINC » 80 PE S A IE6D . UNIT PORTLAND .; % AKA :0101 R9LL : S990TUT1t UT2t � T� 7!.100 AO VALCREN 71.100 NET TA X T 79,100 3% DISCOUNT CURRENT TAX DO-VAL 13.000 AD VALOREM *ASSESSED 63.000 NET TAX TAXABLE 63,000 3.4_111SCOUNT UW.10 TAX 1.46!▪ 9% 1,469.94 44.10' 1,425.04 1, +z1 07 to, A.07 "97.66 1.U64.21 1,530.68 1.530.68 45.92 .1.484.76 1 e' 01 71401 14000 iA1l1Y. NIE.1INE urel 15435 SW 114111 597 TIGARD OR 07224 2611090 KEY, 01471437 CILI SARMETT. ANGELA 15435 SN 114TM CT 100 TIGARD OR 97221E 2511001 1099 1 KEY: 01471/16 CTL SLY. K LOUISE: 1 5435 C11 114 ?M CT N!! TIGARQ OR 07221 • M•• A 25140D11 91001 !qt 1012 DI•'Te. •23.74 (2022 AREAtS401 �,L�, EOt JVt Ws ,N17S23A740001334006 FOUNTAINS AT IIPPRIFIELD COHDO PHASE 16 UNIT 97 1211 NAXIt1 3#1a 8902176 NIZ i✓10/g8 �S'88 08021716'0 I ND • PCAt 1912 DISTt 123 -74 LOCI AREAt9101 ROLL SEOt $9904JVt Npi FOUNTAINS AT S RFC M' LA MATT 98 1287 07060710 N7 1/29/08 E 12&? 47060710 I Ni i Lei 1912 t1IloTi 123.74 Ni N1M►t TIASSESSEI AAEWt0101 NOLL SEOt 99909 VETERAN FOUNTAINS AT CONDO 5! ',ANISE 9 TAMABLE .� ++ iU11gERFIELD PIMISE 16 UNIT 3/88 • 88008467 M! 3629.88 SALE 8S 00008467 I ND 8 rommorasacremar NASSESSED TAXIMLE 66.900 AD. VALOREM 66.900 NET TAX DISCOUNT TAX 1.625.41 1•625.44 48.76` 1.576.68 TAMABLE 69.500 AO VALOREM 69.500 HET TE X 69.500 3% DIS :OU11T Ct01RE$1` TAX 1,,688.62 1.: X8.62 SO.66 1.637.!6 75.500 A ► VALORFN 75.304 NET TAX er aoo 3t DESC01011'' 68.100 TRENT TA?; 1.6!92.67 1.652 , 17 49.37 1,402.60 CAI 1912 SIST, 023 -74 prS00 RO VALOREM 1.469.94 KE 1!471435 UTt HAYLEN CORP:MAT:ON. �TLANNp11Al1a " OR 7217 ,`S11fDP. !iCIZ I ft #147146 "Mt ITZt SP KER ELLINA SZALOBAYT JANE 50)35 S A 114TH N101 TIGARD OR '7124 M..NaNwMI4y 2SI IDi?1 0» t KEY1 010. ` 4 t UTI t . UTZ: HAYDEN CORPORATION: 900 A . TOMAHAWK ISLAND OR PORTLAND oil 97217 KEY 1450 $7i CT!.: UWAI 'Acta 0T21 15371 SA 114TH CT 11103 TIGARD 4..97221 2511000 91041 KEY: 01471491 CTL: OENS. GERTRUDE L� t 15373 5$ 114TH CT 11101 TIGARD OR 9 JVt L t t N S AT iELD PARSE 16 MILE °0000 Ca1803 ° 1,12 P Tt :;13 74 • t AIEAtl101 � t S9l�l7�t Ism, PO01T@1IIOS . AT1 AFIELD 191111,11 SAE 1E UNIT 101 LINA E . ODRYT, JA C. 11/07 870 1 N7 1sZ9 _,..ALE 1107 17038%41 I NO A L t 19I2 DlfiTl 003-74 NAP, W A11EA:0101 ..ROLL SE01. AAII0NS .MELD 199011 PRASE 16 KITT 102 W. MIT 100 TKOINA 60.100 NET TAX . 1.149.94 61.1188 SiCOONT 44.10 CIPMENT TAX 1,23.04 7224 25110D1 CTLI 5 AMO. MILLIA0 AMD GENEVIEV E "R TI D 114TH '05 072 2511095' KEY: 014 10 5 STt .. -74 c...4 1912 � N.D-VI L .. /1.100 AO VALOREM t I L t AREAtl101 .. Y 15x0:. ' ° " NAP1 HI E D 1100 NET Ts FOUNTAINS - SUMEPFIELD C n 1? UNIT 13+ , Mt ' %D!'bs eeo2111 t M12 SPCA@ SALE 0560 0 21111 t Iii 0 P obi 1912 1 LOCI 1M Ila-T1 ilYt N}Mt RASSESSED i 4 E .. 01 ROLL :SiEOs S191 �„ TAXIMILE FOUNTAINS AT ROIIERFIELD. (L.'!1O MORSE .17 M11IT 10 JOEHS GERTRUDE L soros 000100 s 01 y , S l i m e SALE 8E012056 I MO 0 79.100 15 VALOREM 1.921.07 79.1.0 HET:. TAM .: 1,921.87 70.1011 .DISCOIW 57.66' TAM 1.064.21 11.00D A• VALOREM 11.68 .000 %.sT ?AX 1. .69 .000 3% DISCOUNT 45.92 CIONIENT -. TAO 1.084.76 1,751.77 11751.77 TAXABLE' .100 3% ;DISCOUNT 52.55 ANT TAX 1.6!0.22 PCT: 'DIE DIST' 02374 LOCe Jtl�,�1 IPEAt9101 ROLL ttrOt . $991.1.. FOIIITAIMSi AT' ;,TAI10ERFIELDI P10 E. 17 . 40.44+444444444,44440.444444+ NILLIAM NAP T 105 6i1E • SALE In, 1�I R ivy? +7#083! 117 1 2 #Sl Ka i 6912 DI!T* :123•74._..: Loc '.1 1 • K190o rte. VALOREM 66.900 NET TAX 668900 3% � TRX r 100 YALORE! .10000 3 .. DISSCCOIMIT TAB' 1.625./ 1/425:44 '.83.76 1.476.68` 1.824.68 1.769.9944 0.700 A0 WA.1111E' 4 11693.05 6!.700 ITT 9, v J' 2511 001 FEY: 91131 "T 31 i L *WAND. ., I CATIERIME' 1 0 I N1NNY ARE ETRL IFIC 14100 OL SN NNY T E a 9'1X34 2S 1101AD 00001 KEY; 00491140 PL cRANN NEST F URST FARIEST 11' SINNCO' P FRRIPLAND00 O AR yu SO SO NC I 7x02 i 373 423-70' 4Vs34114 WPs ROM 1 1 AtX•2 SEOs 99096 SAS Oae tE4�i01i2 s 701 ROLLST a O2"J -74 11� JY8 567 i A AP: NCR ' MLN3i09 AREAIX-2 L sej �5190044.60AC Ti 1:►E PRNORIMN A I N 00FE 'EC KEC 07-00 '� �E 0502 02012501 rS 1 .0000 INEET TT VALOREM 21.000 3% DISCOUNT CURRENT TAX 2226100 AD VALOREM 16700 .100 NET TAX 30 DISCOUNT 0700 SENT T 2S1'10110 ONO2 KEYS 4049110 Cis SC�� •, noun' MD ANTE 210 i 1311 sT IC VIM 021 CANADA 2S110AD !NOS KEY: 010143997 CA: UT11` VAN L0R• JOSEPH N AND LINDA E 0125 fN CANYON OD PORTLAND OR 07:20 -0000 1 7002 lISTs 023,74 s : X•2 POLL SEO1 25110AD 01!00 KEY: 01272394 CILs4000' USTNAP UT21 IRO. IRIS C' 14005 5M t09T11 TIGARD OR 97223 Is 10E2 0477 700 LAND NJD:06333 NAP: ` 00011 ORIAN AND ANNA 511416 FO 01LITs I23°�7b 4,1' 656 IMP 5000 301E $ N•��7 f-1 56 PCP. 1012 015,1 0- 7%i LOC1 14005 109/11 AVE IREAtETIS ROLL 5E08 RLN96567 154011306 'Le ti231 0S PTR 743 JV100002 ITx� TT�NINON 11001111 11,000 .000 r IOREII TAX 2% DISCOUNT CLVPENT TAX 510.2'` 510.23q 15.31' 494.92' .404.50 3 ,4044.1 31.432 16 510.23 510.23 15.31 4!432 110000 At VAI.OAEN 401.00 1 .000 1 Ei TAX 41!1.00 1 0000 34 OISCOUIT 14.43 e;., TAX 101.65 *s* 110,I i .� .* TAKES' "3 LAND _ 14.000 119 YAL0IEN IIiNt 40.000 000 DISSCCOUNT 00AR 0 CURRENT TAX AXADLE 74.000 1027 1 NO 0 1.797.94 1,797.94 5394 1.100.00 2S1015 09000 KEY: E 01272401 �sS000 HA?INERLY, R411U1' J 1110 LEAH R 14807 SSG 109TH' TIGARD DO 17223 25110AD 01100 UT 1s 012724/0 UTZ::' FORELL. MILLARD .1/DONNA C LIVING TRUST 4305' talEENTREE 1"cD LAXEOSNEGO OR 97034 2SIIOAD 0'4200 KEY: 012714419 CTL 1 LIND. NP,AGERYLOU TTFsl5.. HARPER. DAVID IN FDOlLIND. A IUtTON 1305 GREENTREE RD •"" LANE OSNE0O OR 97034 CTLs500o ANDER ;;. ELIZAIETHHHiA' 15001 5N 109TH STREET TIGARD OR 97223' 2S110AD.90000 K 1: 0 034204 CTTL2: CANTER CONDO DY, HOFFNAN AN HILLTOP ESTATES 1000 SM MADISON PORTLAND ` OR 97200 25 D 90001 KEY: N! r3 Ie2Z CTL, 13 UT UT2i LAND, JMIIES 9_ , LOB, NARY.LEICA LARD. ROBERT E ET A6 i4020 .511 109TH I GARD co 97223 PCPs 1012 DIST: 013 -74 LOC1 14007 109111 AVE PREA:ETIG ROLL 5E01 LN3975 10005001050163040 LOT 2 ACAS 1002 I1IST 23 LOC :15„Ti0H `9T 'RANDLE VEND FORELL" NI 02#15 000 LIN1D. 11100000 •20 _.._ "" ..." 14-000 :0 VALOREM u.`%�v7.ta. .000 NET TAX 000 3* OISCOIOIT' 74.000 NT TIX AAPi 10011 r ' aai40L.E ND0, : III .;4100000 AWE 00001 WON yd++ 704E G 011 t LIVI1lG TRUS1 -, 1� ..24345 NARAER OAYID N OULA BURTON 0247 170095' N9 ��.'1047 FORL N J C TRUSTEES �!4 ? 235 E 040242351 i0_® II of PC e/ . NsCA: 12 DIST :023- 74�VAI. L 14017: 109TH 1AVE 'Ssit0000 Wit 00001 tA6SEZ. !AREAS Iry _ROLL. SEAS MILE PmNILERoo . LOT 4 LIND IMMIGERVLO 1#A BURTON WAFER, MI N 02103�p 9_5'�h VO .10107 ?WELL, NIlL1111 .! FORELL :P S 11/13 - 41 r! OF E ;i/G 1103 E3D41M A PCPs 4012 DIST: 023-74 0 LOCa 15001 109TM ST JVt00000 1100s OO�PR AREA:10046 ROLL SEfrt 96 �Id3037�?EM,T 1 1 • .: ZONE s 007, 7!035947 I All F FOREST 1111. ROD T OMR. TAX L1AIILITY A: 9902 DIST i `h a:a11211 IMM. M�Mt, sr. tea NQODS �COMMDN twat OS CONDOZ04 14,000 RD 1M1L OREN .0 -000 NET TAX 000 33 DISCOUNT 74.000 CURRENT TAX 1o7, . M.079gq40 ..' 1.74 4 1.747.94 1.7!97.94 53.94 1.744.00 0 BID. VALOREM } NET TAX DISCOUNT TAX 74.-7.000 1.797.90 7x797.'9 1,7444.0000 119 WX11 .000 NET TA•:taSSESSED 1,200 .200 34' DISCOUNT AXABLE 00.200 C1 11T TAX T 0 PC$. 1112. LOC: 14020 109TH AREA :91033 0011E RE es 447 tti*i*x******* *5 ** *****0* *x; 1APKEt, 10i.eio MARKET BASE -OV 54970 r .00 IASE°02 DASE406 S14.00 , Pi t-07 AD! VALO+:l`l .004.357.01 F21( t5SMT 423-14 tAo PANS $ 1AOM* .01240INT. CON N ELEIl4fI SALE 10 1 ****1<* 7t:'0 ,moo ssswi:4*111i � 0926, ILD -. - iI 411•1'9!' M T ISS.'1s °73 3%' Il SO1 140.300 L„r i59i.00 1 Pe pa 43.2`0 AC .VALOREN 1,21` TAX 03. 090 CLMIAENTSCO T TAX ,•• •••• •• •1 •• 1.049.01 1.049.01: 1,410.12 357 9 41!1 100 AT S 7SSih.00 `OS „ :97111 .00 .00 OASE ..10..:. .00 SCOUNT 4.71111.097.90 CURRENT T11152e006•7R1.4 .a ILI . . 14 CTLt_ 5000 NCOe INNE' .L. J190ETN H A N 15478 Sit 114TH CT 078 TIGARD OR 97224 At 1912 DIST: 023 -74 1 Ce IIIIEAel10 GEa: JVt NAPe 01.N8396 19~799 POIRtTAIYIS AT 51AIIIERFIELII PMASE 12 v!T 7 +++ s++++ ++s++ I IE2pN LQ..0 70'030 11 0347 I70131Q1 Nei 12/11ee7 SALE f 0!!7, 07043901; T AD 0 25110 f�ij 7:*91 RC11e 1!1$ DIST' '023 -7'e 0 .k't AAA: PI RL in.41 y ,56203 xa CTLe S000 tit 2: AREAe910t ROLL $EOe S �1bSA/LE'' H1MM' rEN N/i R T R »V 2191 AIMS AT "ii.D 154111 5I 114TH 51 079 Pt 12 UNIT 79 N+++ o44∎N*4 +++GO+++ +++N • GLf �IiKM9RIA T ,'' 070'12211 ` N6 121111.7 1897 07042291 I KO 0 ACA: 1912 DIST: 023 -74 ! JVt Ntlrt LLOaCI ANEAe9101 ROLL. SEA: 49090 AT Sr MERFIELD PHASE 12 UNIT MO °- 4++•+$$44+4444 .NAYNOND, SRR DOROTHY 99 041299 N3 9/29/99 ELAKELY Ni1RTIN/FREIDA t IE1Yr 0,i!9131Letz "LTL7, MAY k 4ARD 0 IA AND DOROTHY TIGARD:, f14TN OR !7224 72.700 AO VALOREM ,700 NET TAX 72,700 31 DISCOUNT CURRENT TAX 1,766.39 1,766.39 52.99 1.71 3.40„ 06.900 AD VALOREM 66,900 NET TAX 66.900 DISCOUNT 07 7 39451 N6 12/11/07 TALE 0717 87039499 °I NO ja. `''2G>� 1010 "` 1 PCA: 1912 DIST: 523-74 ! e MA Ps rLI4 10C:1 TAif100S1A*ap IEL , 09/88 036290 N2 8031088 SALE 08110 900096208 I' ND lA 119.14 1 . ., ACA: 1912 DIST: 023 -74 0 UT1 t , UT2T21 4 : AREA :910i ROLL SEA: ',Vs ItgPt MARVA, EDNARD T LIMA FOUNTAINS AT SUMIERFIELD PNA 9 IT 92 15432 6N 114TH CT 1102 NARVA OMAR�.DD UNIT TIGARD OR 97224 11887 07057!0 N6 12/114? SALE 1107 07`96790 I ND 0 r � � '91�i7 �, Yn . s��, w�.rwsr� MS.:►�.roo¢ `a�, , .. PCAs I E1I: 1 ! CTLe LOCI 1912 DIST* 023 -7'4 ! _ _ TRACY, SHARON N UTtt FOUNTAINSI0? SUMMERFI 0l091JV NIT 1 YELO "MACE 1 UNIT 1,S�e32 sEil 114TH CT � 1�►t + *�+w "�I'IPCY N llgARD ,OR 97224 09/07 87049568'N6,12/11/87 SALE 0987 07041568 E ND 0. 2S11SD0 �l0842 'CA: 1912 DIST: 023 -74 ! 1cEYt :01456259 'CTL: Lai n OTI t . UT2: AREA/ 9101 ROLL O: 59990 �` OAHRENIURG0 WILLIAM H $ FOUNTAINS AT SINN4ERFEELD PC�'iASE 13 UNIT 84 CHARLOTT! 1 +++6++++++e I*HREI !URG, RILLIAN H - NBURG. JANES G/CANDi*CE 1411100 .MIMES 0/CPNDACE' M -- -« 11107 SALE 0987 07050290 I �4D 0 . Z •ens.. KEY: 0 iN267 CTL: UT," UTZ: =AHREHEUli6. JANE�S 6/CANDACE IAHRSABURG. CHARLOTTE G 767 JOHN RINGLING BLVD D-4 12/87 - 07959271 N6 s2�'2"3/07 SARASOTA E1 34236 10/87 ^nsme N6 12/ NAP: 49.500 AD VALOREM ,500 NET TAX 690500 3% DISCOUNT CURRENT T1 VASSESSB 660900 AD VALOREM 44.900 NET TAX 66,900 3% DISCOUNT ANT TAX DL `VAI. 69.900 AD VALOREM � 6%,904 NET TAX T01 1LE 0-' 3% DISCOUM CURRENT TAX TAXABLE N� 'M 1IPH N AND p� 5430 SM 1 1 14Th CT 1106 TIGARD OR 97224 , 2S1101111'.4986 1 PCAi 1912 DIST' 023 -7* ! UTt 011!56276 : LOCI JVt 4OSEPft, ORENCE . ROLL �A: 3!0!1 IMEAt91E'1. FOIiNTAIF� AT St�NIEIELD : �� 14 . YODER� R 1 5430 SN 114Th r:T` 006 ++44.+444.4+ J TIGARD OR 97224 0947 i17r, - -366 '~6.12/1147 1ILE 4 251I01, 90872 PCA: 1912 11578 08223'74 1 ACV: 01456285 CAL: LDr"a UTIs AT2: ARE A19101 ROIL 0E01. ,3JVt 8MP t CARROLL, II ESTHEA E FouNTRIi1s AT SUMMERFIEL4 PHASE It IDII1 !97 15430: 'SA 144TH CT 087. +++4 +44i- +.: ++ 'ART R TIGARD ESTER ! N- ... -..... OR 97224 0216 S 99004997 '114 2st3/lb E OE OLl0o�1169 1�'� 1 PCP 1e 912 GIST, 023 -74 0 LOC: AREA / 11A 1 ROLL SEGi 1.lV: 11 14 c TA▪ SEED ABL 1.625.44 1.625.44 40.76 1,576.68 1.668.62 1.688.62 50.44 In62S.44. 1,625.! e 57►. 1 1.6!0.3{4 1.698.34 50.95 1.647.39 69.700 AD VALOREM 69,700 NET TAX 69.700 30CI NT UR 1.693.48 1,693.48 1.6 22.666 - o.M..,..a. M.M.. -M 72,700 MUD VALOREM 1.766.39 72,700 NET TAX 1.765.39 72.700.31 DISCOUNT 32.99 CURRENT TAX 1,711,40 DLD -VkL 60.500 AD VALOREM 1.469.94 1,469.91 41.10 *ASSESSED 40.500 NET TAX TAXABLE I 60.500 30 DISCOUNT FOUNTAINS AT SUNWLPFIELD ANISE I4.. UNIT 85 ++++4++++ +4+ +++.444+++44+ YO: A JOSE/ . A/FLORENCE . 4 09007 97049564 .M6 12/11 097 S*I.E 001'97 ! 1041Se 1 ND 0 2S1104I SV802 KEVI 11456294 CTL: UTCFIl RLAME. ROBERT AND MARGARET J 15430 SA 114TH CT ,099 .: TIGARD 0R 07224 IMI�: UNITT OD !I� 70499 06., I ND O Ae 1112 DIST: 1025-74 ! 1 90E4:9101 ROLL SEO :. gr4.IYri FOUNTAINS, AT sumMERFIELO� � It RODERT 88 H+2++l4 AND MARGARET 4 0:1087 87047596` N6 12011087 SALE 0107 07047516 I ND 0 A >a TA1011N.E T• ILE TA• XABLE OBIRVIIT TAX 1,425.84 75. C00 AD VALOREM' 1494.40 0311.40 • j00 NET TAX 1,034.40 70. X40 31 DISCOLNIT 55.03 CURRENT ' TAX 1,779.37 63.000 AD VALOREM 43.000 MET TAX 83,000 CLRREMT TAX 11.530.68 1,530.68 45.92 1.494.76 Tl,1O0 AD VALOREM 79,t00 NET TAX 79.100 31. DISCOUNT CURRENT TAX 2511001 10011 !'CA: 1912 UST: 023 -74 9 KEY' 01456301 CTLe5000 LOC) UT1:. U72i aREA :9101 1101.1 SEMI 3!095 Jlie writ 121021* ,ALICE C 0LlA306 +!193002 FOUNTAINS ' AT SUMIElFIELD Po !OX' 2408 PHASE 14 UNIT IS ++.4+4444.44444.1N.444.4 +++ + GEARHART OR 97130 IiERaEL ALICE 6 10087 97054769 N6 12/11/07 SALE 159'?' 07054769 T, MO 0 25110E K E t 8109--'0310 CTLT2e HAYDEM CORPORATI0M 900 N. TOIN MIE 'ISLAND.. Pro PORTLAND OR 97717 251104°.. 910!1= KEY: 01456329 CTLL* GIMNUTIi. ELL. mJO1111111 13437.514 114Th CT;.: 091. TIGARD 1 01157223 : 9907: 023 -74 LUC i JYa AREA19101 ROLL 560: 498!6... FOUNTAINS AT..SUMMERFIEL! P102 1 SALE 0000'COND0803_ ! Kok 1912 DIST: 023-74 '! .u. LOCI AItM1 :9101 ROLL trot IR0101TAINSAT SiMMEAFIELl �C* AIM ET 111 10;17 87052906 N6 12/11/1!7' SALE: 10,7 07052006 2 110 0 assesses 1M .E 1.921.87 1,921.07 37.66 1.864.21 72.100 $D VALOREM 1.'S?'rti77 72.100 NET .TAX 72.100 31 D�SCOINT S2.S5 C1RlR t T TAtt 1.69 .22 11lM'i s r'10a NEI TAX.. 10625.44. OAT 90 x.500 31 DISCOUNT 49.76 ® 117 ei k 1.576.60 2!!'i ILr -VA1. ,100 AD %m oREM st,ssesuro 71,100 ;NET_, TAX'., . . TAXAILE TS.100 31 DISCTARIT TAX 1,1D24.68 1.824,60 54.74 1.701.00 90821 '.' EDWARD & LINA 'NARY 1532 SW 114Th Ct 4tZl3 T� GARD, OREPON 972w4 J ,.A flito Ci, Hr yor advised bids would be 'o site City' '.council been sc'±adl!led i aL, oca inesta �ransporstApation Safe ii es dsy', Co tract y�Review Briar April prove at3.ni� , IsITORS AGENDA,: y ' Bob , . , ,�.1, �. "2040 A1, North ;Dakota, Tigard, Oregon noted' concerns with:, the' proposed 'construction to .21st Avenue.,. Nv. Lars ll said resicents' ,' questions . were `not ; answered completely oc directly a recent neighborhood meeting. He stated he Thad Feld:'. intimi� ated' ;by ,City` Staff and the. consultants ;for, thl ,projects,." r. Larsell read through ` a list of ' questions ��oncE�irntng 'the • project. (Notes This- `list.' has• been„ filed' with Cowls,. p kckat material e) He advised. the,,. proposed changes, Were':::* a `+,aste taxpayers' money. Staff' directd 'to ;review Mr. Larsel o's f concerns and'°'follow u with a report to Council. John S flete, 6830 s. . Bonita ;;;Road, T,igar^d, Oregon, ¶ equestec Council consider the removal of Consent Agenda Item` No :2,;; (Authorize Preparation of Prethitinary Engineer's 'Report for , the Proposed : PacTrust Improvanaent' Distca 7.t)', Mayor explained tht:.2 Council, .at 'their .Mast 'meeting; had an e.'d the '.;subject agenda item ' to thin .ate for consideration: .'Mayor advised that authorization of the preliminary e t Jeering report would not obligate PacTrust ' Or the City tq ,i'''f.orm a ?Local Improvement District. The 'report would be utiil.'lized to 'help determine whether local i :provement district ,formation would be feasible. (Ltr. Smets submitted written comments on the proposed Local Improvement District; ithis document has been , filed wit74 the Council packet material.) CITY CITY CENTER PLAN TASK 'FORCE KEYS TO THE !� a . aka,; or Edwards advi sou Council wished to ze those persons, who had worked long and hard on thy; City Center Plan Task g e Keys . ' to .._.Force: The following individuals were p>''asent�.d. with t the "City! Stuart Cohen Pam Juarez R. Michael Harr Richard Morale y (Pam Juarez was not present; ; her Key, to the City would 'tie forward Mayor Edwards noted the City appreciated the sta isicp individuals end would probably be calling upon them '.4 in assist with City projects. Council Nep'cin nutes -' Ap'eil 2 , 1 985 Page r• h U r MSENT y1 f. ,., d S�; , ?989' pprove.FGity Couiocil�:,Minrate�s`` forn��tarch lad; an 7 ,, , Ruth ar ze Preparation of , ,t relus t�ery ` t hgineer's Report 'for ',the Proposed 'acTrust� Local' Improvemeht� D stir �.t; W esoiut on +loo.+ i�2P �a � tX � a x i (Continued? from tie April 10, x.989 Council rmeeting+ Recess '.runcil ",Meeting, Convene ' Local;, Contract Review Board (LCRB) ' p Meetin g: " a) Approve Consultant ' Contract ;,for McDonald Project; b) Authorize `Bidding oil Various Projects; 'Adjourn Reconvenes Council Mee ting+ t �ti ?n No ` 89 30 Accept S.W. Maeve Street Public Impro�remgnts- Resu�ttiy �.. Endorse Recommendations .on Scholls F cry + Rd Project Resol "cation Ro• 89 -'•31• N+ i, M ��zion,,by Councilor S thwartz, seconded by '+councilor Johnson, to pull the 121st Stre' project from Item .3b for opportunity for future Council. d scus�i.: (See Mir. Larsell's comments under the '•V 'ton's " Agenda" section of t hose ,Minutes • ; City` Administrator will look into the issue and. report '''to 'Council Motion was passed .,i unanimous vote of.' ,Council ,resent Councilor Schwartz noted Cz�tsent} .Agenda Items, .3a and • Sb ,wer Transportation 5af my Bond pro j eras Motion by Coui cilor 4 of sor, ;'seconded; by ry councilor ladon, to approve the Consent ,,Agenda with the removal of thin 121st Street project. c esenl., The motion was approved by ,�E,�unanimoui vote of Coun 3,1 pr �� L �tt Y {I a r ai` 1 w .,"�p t 6�iaa hww''''' tee( Rihl:Ii >sl 4 L i' %�„d qh�V �'.[l #Vxh .�a �� ..,uyi 1; l„ .i..�.:��. -at„t h'W: JS.. c ..rKm V � ,t �-�M 4ePLl�tA1NG RESOURCES, S, PIRG. gPO . #b Reeciti st 4ciif0`C�. ; `a "' Comprehensive Plan MendiSent from Medium Density- Residential tip Medium-Higtz Density Residential and a Zone 'Change from R -12 (Residen\` ial 12 units /acre) to R -25 (Residential, 25 units /acre) for approximately 1 4.27 acres of an 13.27 acre . parcel. The reMainder of the parcel is designated Medium -Wx,gh `,�)ensity Residential and is . zoned ;R--25 LOCATION:' 11165 SW NaevE !,tretet (WCTM 2S1 10.0B, eastern half of ILIK Lot 200) . a b Publa.e heari6g wag opell.a d. • ,: , , . o . Diecl a rat3ons o r ch alle ng es. Councilors Fades and Kasten noted they had had conversations with .c is Both Councilors indicated that they felt they 'could be impartial in considering the issue and Would p artia spate the he firig process, . Senior Planner Li.den summarize i the agenda tent He located t ie area On a .mat' Ittat was on display:' :Ile advised staitf hod revier ed the request cud be consistent 0 th Co: r= : ens ve Plan AMendment cr :ke sty c4 wtcil Meeting Mini es April.24, 19 age • Senior Planner .noted t 'he Comprehensive Plan' does not? provision for averaging ; `densities on one or r more 'parce,l was sucggested • by tt►e Plana .ng C�attmtission. ate noted concern this wousld raise for abutting property .'o�nners -- would not knots' ; r,'hat density they couad expect along property lines:. {, D is cu ssion follo wed ;� o n the.. Aoning hi�tory of this .property. , parcel and?dj acent parcels were "annexed, .to the City ,of ' Tigard. 'in 1981 with a 'Washington County zon►g. !designation / (residential, four units - -acre) . The City of Tigard Comprhensive Plan Revision, CPR 1 -81, approved redesignat .on cif 'she w, entire parcel ' from 'low - density residential to medium► - density r'esidu*�tia�l and a zone change . to . R -12 ( residential,, 12 units- acre.) . `The " Planned Development (PD) Overlay zone was added' to {the; >.requested'," I1-12; designation so that all development "proposals`' fob . "the `. property: would be required to. be revieared', by ;the , Planni , Co_,,. i 3ion. in December 1986, the Tigard City., Council gave condition approval to the Albertson's Comprehensive Plan, Amendment, changing the designation of several properties rlocatre" southeast corner of Durham Road and Pacific Highway. approval redesignated these, properties from high ,de"ns residential to general commercial • The result of', this p,decisioy was the removal of the opportunity for , approximately; 441 potential multi-family ho g units from ' Tigard", s. ynv e ntor vacant, buildable and: The Metropolitan: Mousing y of ,Rule ° (Oref,,o Administrative R ules, Chapter 606, Division 7)1, requires; 'I'. ha Tigard provide a housing oppox'tunity, r for :. at least , �o perceni multi- family units and, a 'net �1iinitaum housing density of ' It dwelling u nii s per acre on Vacant,, buildable land w th :n th City' 's urba planning area. The Albertson';s�. CPA Was..,graa the condition' of redesignation of sufficient residential 1' higher densities to take, up for the housino .,opportunity `sho created by the decision Several sites throughout the City, inc ,uding the subaec were considered for increased ,residential r; densy i ties tc for the housin g o pp o rtunity. hors fali created City Council Meeting Minutes -! April 24, 19 89; dPag6 decision . western , half of the ,, rO and. the, parcel „, west were. ropOsed: ,for ' plan/zone .re es.INEla ,,',, ' ' * ' ' '" tio`r from ine density , ' ,' .'t4itideektiatiR-12 . APaj,, ' Ita mediU thtil detO reeidential.W25 (PD),' (CPA 87707(G)/4 , ,02( a )) . N o Chan go, . designation.' ,,Was rotkoSed for the i„eastern ;halt of the Sander's parcel. T,,fi, proposed redesigniltio!1- Of 't e, vies ern half i''` 11, -'- 1 s' ' - h ' western of the ProPertY, , it i the aaiaiierit, parcel was approved' by City Council on April 13, 1987: , Public Testimony: testified 1 d been the owner use of ih ir'pl!r5ly Viilliam Satider,' 22363 Dents Street 'NE, Aurora, OR 910i)2'. ' , h'. hl'i the history of ' ' c' of the property since , i. nHoetirneglatthee6 heaoatne6,0efrat-e,d a ii„ ur, seri. buthseitietts, on , the firoperty,, until 'ihey no longer had water rights for this Pseg:, He was aware of the transportation , issttes. and cottcertt:4 ' 'of the Siotmerfield residents. He advised there were ser.eeral buyers ready to bi.c1 on the property, but the sale would be predicated on resolvittg the zoning issue'. , o Rick Givens, Planning Consultant., 3601 SW Carmen Drive, Lake Oswego, OR 97015. , Mr. Givens noted the ZOilitUs configuration was difficult for development with one half of the property, zoned R-25 and the other half zoned R-12. There was nil logical way of developing the 'site for use.' . , Mr. Givens 'reported topography was reason ' fOr:',..thezoning line as draWn. He said a, developer has'. expresed' interest in the 'property if ,19:, to 20 uflits per acre would be allowed The parcel ° .,-current zoning Would not permit the ,,developer. the most desirable manner:: Mr. veus pointed out that t'Ae ProPertY was 400 feet from ,the nearest jingle -familY zoned area; close to 'major' transportation routes; ' and solgsr and water services were readily available. , He reviewed some of the traffic issues. , He said that most of , the riieciple from the development t,,tottld probably Use 99W rather than trav(7,:litls through the residential area. , He advised his client "'Would not have di* dtfficulty,, „as 'a condition of development, limiting density to no more than whai. the total combined density of the two parcels would all° should Council decide to not rezone the One parcel to R-25., Roger Anderson, 10120 SW ,'Kable'. Tigard OP1- 07224 legal counsel for /ire and Mrs. Sandere, 'testified 'the, request 'Wee not in conflict with surrounding zoning. He 'believed the split of the property With the two zonihs designations was mistake and should be corrected for the ' benefit ' of the proi)erty owners, ' •• • ••„.,. ••••:. • . •• • ••• •••••• •• 1•■•• • •,• • • • •,” •'. • ••,,,,...••• •••.• •:. •••:' Apz'il 24, 1989, Page'6, eating iues Dave Atkinson ;0460 SW t Cei tory aak Drive, noted hef, ti� concerned iF , with„ ' increased ingressiegress' t,o the area. He reported t tLh suvrounding , , the �'guumterf field neighborhood" hit x o't increaV dnatsities , in 'recent h .stoL!ti• ; different ,apartment developmets`. a then u; +h ec ,,a � ,d , � scheduled for cotstruction, He requested the status, maintained. He reviewed Hating that:. SW "109th " was. through Summerf ield;. He ra: ocked . on the subject, some. ' o the history blocked i so traffic 'Well'; asked , that 109th and, " property ' 1 1f the `are d not trayel aeve remain fir Aticinson noted concern . about the accuracy. o est ;.'c t es and the impact increased traffic wau1 community. Mr. Atkinson, said retirement commelnittes were a 'Ettable economic factor , as Well' pis a' . large' : pool of volunteer, workers.` for the City' of Tigad. . He , asked the City, +hen ,a►king decisions o to coi cider the d�otriri�ental affects. ° �p f, destabilizing an area such as �umn�erf� .el +d.,a Ken Cheeley, 7 3390 SW Alderbrook ColrS ,r,‘ d w n advised s representing umerf i A Association. 1 He noted he ,'w ►s: 'alsio the President o Liaison Committee to ; the. ' Tigard' City Ccunc 1. He rein that his constituents were concerned b±eca+use , rytlaey promised tw`o years ago that ' if the Albertson" a t derveioi: 0nt w supported, they 'would net have ''so mane apart nts �u ha immediate area. He` noted, sever p,, al a artmeint comp'lexe ; recent r constructed (or planned ; for deve ,opaient) which "Teurrowrtded° t Summed field area: He advised as the density increases, ,;there .. er of persons utt.li�ting L urham:' 'Road and Sun uet traf. f is shortcuts ' He advi ed. .increased' s ` ore so ' than' e1. erl �at�inerf ie�,d , c�:tz�'eti �, , . increases: were to occur tt another neighbor ►ood' City Council Neeting 1989, arr W •Da 109th, OR' 97'223 '� Marge Da�ienport, 15100 .'W lgan�d, not ®d,+ cor cerns Over. the ;traffic ' ` fGr th0:,::. ' p' oposed developmec also voted that ` she was opposed to cl '44,ng of Naeve' ,;Road q'at' 109th She advised ', `that devie,ie r, eflt along 1�09tti j. o onto 'lthe s''reet would ncreaseF''traffic additional drivewa4� „ ,, N hazards. S.►e "'said ,rmore . p ianninL 'was needed'. Phil P'asteris, N1P0 #6 member, ..$935 SW Pinebrook, ��igard,`. Or' egon noted concerns, ° about overall philosophy '.a,and tb n0* o f A q review ' regional conc'epts. He dv sed care ;should ''tie" taken; that spot, zoning does not occur,, He paid he" was ,1onc.rned about traffic` .and the , "need f��r ' ;�idv'rnce p,lann3;,ag " w►3 th '40#04604r0 He noted the zoning 'des'ignat ions `:should . bit; fairly constAnt , in order . to. :' stabilize the area;' so ° that organized,,,' planned ,c,rowth would occur Mayor 'Edwards noted . that a mnemorandrum ;from Jane . Miller o : f 10920 SW '' Hi. „bland Drive, Tigard, Oegon, was submitted' in opposition to 'the .;proposed 'zone , change'+ ue alsa advised Mrs.' Miller'' sent newspaper articles concerning pla +!nning issues 'kith ' her l €tter. (These ('ocu'. ;nentS have been filed,. With the ,Council` peaket material.) 'Recommendation of the Connity Development Staff was for one approval of the pr.'k,3sed Man and Zoning Map' amendments. City Attorne. y, nosed that should Council desire to look at limiting density Ian the area so no actual increase would 'take place on the c mt►ined R -12 and R -25 , parcels,' it was •Within Council's ' authority to, place a condition on the" density. The condition: he suggested would be to grant a zone change for the' entire, property provided the density on the, two pardels did not e tceed a certain number , of 'units (i.e., 151 units as Was' suggested by the attorney for the applicant). Council discussed the pros and cons of limiting density. ;Also discussed was the need to review the regional, traffic itsues prior to allowing any increases in density. public hearing was closed. L. Consideration by City, Council. Motion Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Kasten, 'to otion by Councilor , pP zone change t R , contingent the approve the zon anger', £rom R -12 ::, ,.o � 25 tangent � upon extension of Beef Bawl Road to the' subject property and th e density be limited so that no i,aore than 151 . units would be constructed on the subject property`: The motion failed by ' a ` vote of 3 - 2; Councilors Kasten and , Johnston, and Mayo voted 'Aye," and Coen' cilors Radon, Edwards voted "Nay." y g April 24, 1989 , Pa Cxt council ZYeepin Minutes A r _?1 city Council M6etin& Minute �oeinis��saar ammrs :�asr�aasaamszaa��ssa�iiem.� �¢ teas m�srarc�oesiaz�sassr�3sss�ei�ais�a�a 'sii�essasac ,,. ., � , 111111111 -s S.W. -r; 111!111 1/ s ar /NNW sea ®t�}, ar �; + 1 •'� Asa am .am i D, ,74 111111 SIM Lt. itar M4.11141214 larelrozA:" Ng_ 11111.wd1HIS ALfi18i ' STAFF RE PORT AGEilIDA ITE+P'l 5.2`:. • M PRIL 4. 1080 89 - 3 7 0 Pr TIGAR[D " PLANNING COMMISSION TIGARD .CITY 'HALL TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGAR,D, OREGON 97223 . FACTS 1. General nformatt CASE: Compr•ehensiu.+e Plan A►nendaent CPA 89,'-02, Zone Change ZC 69-02 Amendment ��•� Medium Density REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Mao . Residential' to Med ium- -High ^Ins i ty � Residential And " a Zone Change from R -12 (P0) (Mul, .L- Family Residential, 12 units ��oent) to R--25` (PD) (M.ilti -- Family per acre, Planned , ®ev��:•� � Residential, 25 unt:r Per, 'acre, Planned Developme nt ) for approximately 4.27 acres, APPLICANT: Planning Rescur Je"s, Inc. 3681 SW ` Carman Dive Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: William & 'Claire Sa►ncilei's ; 2236 Ber►',s Street NE 4urora, "FOR '97002 LOCATION: Eastern half of 11165 SW Naeve Street tMTM 2S1 10DB, . lot 200). 2. Background information This parcel and adjacent parcels were �onne;xed to the' City of Tigard ib p � ► 4 (rtes denri�l 1981 with a Washington County zoning we,iesi,grtation of, RO iV Plan 4 iun,its /acne) . City : of Tigard Camp►-ehen�s..,.�� iievisan ,LPit ,1 -81 approved redes ignat ion of the entire , parcel from Low Dens ity Residential to Medium Density Residential and, a zone Change to R-12 (Residential. 12 units /acre) The Planned Development (PR) overly zone ed t -12 designation "so that �►'1 was added posals for the grope y to be reviewed de�.►elo0,�ment _prop required t. rt wowld be r��quir by the P1anrcing Commission. In December 1986, OG the Tigard City Council gave cortditional approval to the Albertson' s Comprehensive Plan Amendment for changing the. Plan _gnation of l properties located corner of �.�� . si _. erera pp ated of the southeast c This appro ` zra rerle ignated these Durham Road and P 'ic i f i� y Highway. propertie from High Density Residential to General G ;mm.ercial. The result of this decision was the removal of the opportunity for apprbxmately 400 potential Multi-am 1y housing U,llits from Tigard s The Metropolitan ;Housing Rule inventory ,.of vacant, buildable land. (� ,.. Davis;'.. ,. " s that (Or"c'9on Administrative. Rules, Chapter 660, a.on 7) require Tigard provide a housing oppdr�°thnity for at least 50 percent multi - family units and a net ma.nimUm housing density of 10 dwet41ing , STAFF REPORT - CPA 89= -02 /ZC 89+-02 (SANDERS) PAGE L.. .4 units r acre ;on,, ', ..... Can ,buildable ,,. ' ;,, ,, ,,,,,,2,:•- • Planning Area. The AbertsontS an '0, ,oz 9,r -j-. t, o,,•'.,, T "!deii;9ation o sufficieni,residenti ,. r enSi ieS , makeup for the housing,opp itunitnortr rea ' he declsxon.', , . ,,,, , ; ,,, :, ..,, ,,, ,, -,•',,,,,,.,, ,.' ,, ,'. ,; , ' ''...',- ,.,'`,"':''''''':,,' ‘‘,' ,-■ .5 , i I , , S e !Ie ra 1 sites throUghoUt the City ino• udi t $ 3 ,.. the 1 j ,ec. t,p,roel,;,were._ ,, considered 1.nce2ased ,reSiclenti,‘±l, densi:tio!....:,':to -,f,nake iip', fi,.-.1,r, j',the'' 1196 ti ilg ', ,pFic)rtunity shortfall 'created by ,,*4e',4)13.berisOitia s,,'detlS i on .:i',4,,;,:-rhe,'-';', ..'' western 'half- of the ,subject property ,•a1,1ci, , the parcel to s'41P i'let'',.0"!i' proposed , :•,for ';', Plan/zone ;„ ridesignai.k)0,-„ froliv,' ,, Medium ' : '.,':Oenilit,ii,'„ Residential/R-12 (PO) to Medium—High ‘,Densi.t\y Resideritial/-25 (PD) (c-PA''..,,,,, 87-07(G)/Ze. 87-02(b)). flk :,.`change in ciesiinati.on ' Was ,:pror.iot!ed for .'the: eastern half, of the Sanderi' *parcel,: The proposed i.,redeSignattOn of thi,- western i'lalf . of the, property and, the adjacent parcel : was ,approved by,,- ,the City Cout,i(„il. on April 13, 1987. , , o Other ),,ariel use applications 1,•egao7ding 'parel, have been r•etti.elised . ' • .. •, • Tile :Sanders .ip,rof3er14 is,turrounded,',''by dfstrictS,:. R-2 (PD) (fes-identr(,a1„ 25, its/acre Planned DeveIoment to the west and so,th (PD) (General Corsmergkal,,,1?lant1-24'Pele,1013mer,t'ii) ,''to the 'HI southwest, to the totl,theast ', and ' 12 units/acre, Planned 1,tvevelopmei7t)l'iO the north ece -1i7to • the,•4st, „ 11- ••.- east, and north are undeveloped, together with the subject 'parcel,' form the soi/Ititern sipe f Little The , Fountains' at guaoa- fi 411cveicOtieiu'ae 10t6ire'ctly south of ta 1•' ' , Sanders ,property., To the southwest ' at ,,e :i.incie,ttlo 9 parcels as , , ‘.. ■ well as Flectcor's .11Utf•tery,,which fronts•,en Pacif,3.c. • •. , r I , The Sanders 1.3189Pel"tlf has ai*41toroximaely. 22'Z feet of ;,frontage on ),Vaelie Street. Naev.er.s...ti.rditoorit is desi43r.,ated 'a sottru)enti: of- City 1 rarlspo Plan mai? • Naev, Stroet is • Inep-aily st,,starrIclat7de • , width and state 'Of e frk)rItaga Ott the Forntain Summerfi.eld directly •• att'Oss•• fi-om -the' - . Sander` preper7ty.' .Half ' ,strOet .1101It'ot?Itlic■.,nts i.nc1,tiding, 30 feet of PaVeliten,‘ etart,' •a sidewalk, r and ,tteitai411ttl., hue beert,installed alsting' the 'Foul, ta ns. fr4-.)iii.:zz....3q. The deeoper of the Fountains have ,also installed 20 foot Wide, ititer•itii suk-facen, westward to Nae,ite Street's intersection with 136dific HitItitablY a four—lfiree' divided •'/14ted, rroKimteIy feet to a d etta SW • 109th 24")0'• , 500 feet: west of the Sanders' pr000,rtY'. 1 A loft 1 ti...ten lant onto Nae:tie I r Steet is provided for. southbound teal=fic intersection • Of • Street and is hot SW •Aveilue • approximately feet east of , the r.prloper.i'•...,;.,. ,tolith,' • of the SW' 109th tiii6noo is' a fully :1A10i.t')vo..1 the $Liroolict,efiold t()millunzty with totillections ,,sast 'and .'west • lead in o il'iurh,T.4 Road: $W 160th. .t)VdritiO I north Of. he with NdOite, i's, a steep ,tliAtArie,esjaid APPeOstittiOtelyt sl'APP REPORT CPA ,••••-•••••••• .."'",,;••••• 1ul 1 • further north avenue "extends P Ian 'Map ca i l s r utur°e off, the dead end nor thward : to Canter bur tto segment s c Si e,:Information and Propesax.. Descri ern 1 sectt s{ , ra , s 9rcaziv connertedi 'Tax lat 200 is an 8.27 acre parcel presently developed ritlh one,sia le, family residence and several' : roper yI 'j xslopes genera1114 ,to the south and west 'with an average grade ; f 12^ pet^c 1c The property fy�rme r1y was used as a nursery e i s mostly 'wor. ded tFi a. corgi bind tion 1of evergreen .�fid ,deciduous itre'es . The;; laar jest `t :race'` are ,.on+ ',the northernmost portion of; the r preperty . The` , s'Oil tharrive s.t portion of the property,, between ,the ,tom's and Naeve `Str»eet, I is most open } The property is presently served, . iy a ,peptic 'system and sanitary s4a4er and a storrn sewer, are ",located nearby at the internectioi of SW 'Nae,ve Street and SW 109th ,► venue." An 81-inch, diameter ,water mail i,s located along Naeve 'Street. .The ander's• property presently hac split' ; P;an :; f air ion gag. designations. The western 4.0 acres s .designated Vied iur° -High ' Oens ity Residential iby tM! Compr� °eheresive Plan 'Asp and is zoneta' k' 5 .(PD) The eastern 4.2'7 , ' acres . i s designated Medium .. Density Residential and his Zoned R--1' (PD) . The applicants 'request that the eastern 4.,21 acres. he. redesignated Medium - -High Density Residential; and be , re, oned ..(P0) The applicants cite difficulties in marketivt the pr^olperty' for development purposes because of the ' ;pit designation: The Planning Division has previously responded to the, owners' ,and potentiR. l developers inquiries regarding the possibility of averaging the allowed densities for the two portions of the parcel., with interpretation that averaging was no t p o s-. s. f�le: ; (Exhibit:. 1's �7u1y 1988, letter to William Sanders from ZTeery < offer,) 5 Aa gna and NPO' Cammants The Engineering Division' has reviewed the proposal - tnd bt`fered t following comments: u The subject site f'rort t onto . ,SW , Naee Street,: a Rargelf.y collector . as cc+rrition of are d .ae Naetre unimproved minor col ,ector street. Ymprovemer��...� to Street would be required a a y e lopme5'rt of the property . The Irprowp;,d roadway tihouId r+rov ide 4 ; adequate vehicular access for tl'oe site ac the increased. density. j. Sanitary sewer and ; storm drainage impl'ouements Would .hatte,. to be extended from' existing, Manholes at SW Naeve *tereet and S W 109th Allende The sanitary sewer system is capable of providing the necessary service at ` the requester, ncr'eat ed density. The existing storm drainage, systen would be c „equired to be et ai uated as it condition o development of the site Increased density ;Will t,r+pical,ly ,. increase runof=f= slightly but the overall im a+ct tin, `'r�uni ff from this site should be minimal STAFF REPORT EPA 8 4.01,f 2C 8 (SANDE S ACE • • • re W the' �Dr`Negont al:eNxay Ilty'gvi.s.on :;has;` ''ere regarding' 'thE. propo1ai b�,',t hlss r►oted' rthat site 'j t exthen the exiq xng ;',for pr'oposed o Sx re'e�t�1 s , �inte'rsectx� imprb'4tements. �to Nae,ve � . Improvements would `need toa be !con:t`ructed at3' Thct' ar•d Water .'District has. commented tha capacity to, serve the deveflopment. However 'chat it . may be necessary tPr"II serve the;, upper pumped.. water line ',front ' of the site. :Fr7om, a rna►i located along SM difficulties with ,water, pressure.�,r nou O j ections? or corm. nts } ft , uture� developmentr of the nsitib4sk may,< n ess t to iryM , w i'th� a Pac s i 4 �i ighwayr e developer `,s e:cperis� t it's ,water., syst,'em has; the' , the Water ,Dis r.ct 'added ortion '.ef the i S'te { from ,serve the lower :portion Naeve Str. eet beci`tus0 of NPO, #6 has commented • that' the. welter-6_ half of the property shok,,L be down —zoned ' to R -12' rather than having :,the' eastern hal.F of,; the perty: up -zoned to R -25: 'The: NP(O feels that this,, would' make''. the ;:spar ee l a;11more, homogeneous, developable property that could ' be ce 'oatiblc with }' the` existing neighborhood Tigard 'School Distric't 23J and Washington County ;Fire nas't " "rict ,1 reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments were received,• FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planni Goals I and 10.; 'iigard' 'Comprehensive 2.1.1, 6:1.1 } 7.1. .2' : 8.1:1, , 8.2;.2, and Chapter 1°2, Locational Criteria; and the change or mistake quasi- judicial map amendment criteria of 'both . tie Comprehensive Plan and Community Development' Code. The Planning staff concludes that the proposal is dins %stent with the applicable Statewide •Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon' the., following 'findings; 1. Goal #1 `s' met because the City has dopted a ' Cit'ize .s Involvement proggt am including review Of ' all development applications by the Neighborhood' Planning Organiza.ticsi (P1P0). In addition, all public novice requirements have been satisfied for this application 2: Goal #2 is met because the City has applied all applicable Statewide Planni:ng Goals, Zity Ce,mprehensi Ie Plan Policies and Community Development Code requirements to the review ' of the proposal. s Goal ,#10 i Y 9►a txsfied becauso ' the proposa' will provi de for additional housing opportun,;:ties as promoted by s Comprehensive Plan and trig% palifan Hods ,I'rig Rule (Orfgo P t�+�minxstratxve _ Ra;..��r Chapter 660, exvisien 7). Approtial of the' proposal would increase housing oppor-turr∎i$-, .es~' en ' the, oit; developable residential :lands to 10 21 doe .iivq units' per r The STAFF ! PORT - CPA 89- 02. /ZC 89 -O2 ",c'SAt DERS) — 'PA►Z 4 ,, I 6 O".ah..! 4 r r etropolitan Housingi inimur busing oppor nits''., per acre ,,and amily and multi - family t�a.le }' rqu'ir,� u6,1 ' r m i 61 j:m amt" 50/ housing`" T ie Planning staff ! has `. determined that, the relevant portions • of the ,Compreh en; ,n' noted'' beloi: '' 1..: Plan Policy n Organiz.atiore, #,b. aiv.1 of the hearing and an is satisfies grounding,i opportunity e�iaelopable lan ,opportune. irltain. ix far rope sa'L i ' c nsi stmt +Wi, Lan ;Biased Mupon, tt a finding because Neighborhood ,;, Plannin roper °Ly' owners�were given no. tice, to comment on the proposal an Policy 6.1. i is satisfied because the proposal ,would provide the opportunity for additional 'cnulti -- family :development and would increase the net housing opporturlity. ,on buildable lands City. This is detailed in the idiscusion for Goal .10 above. The City of .Tigard is obligated through, :trifle Metropolitan: Housing Rule .: to provide for an equal housing o oo±ttun'ity.,mix of 'single, family; -ani .multi.- family uni „ts with "aA overa,lh development : s .den.t bf 10 Yp y, st that sufficient higher, units � , , er acre. The City 1 ms�.:�., ensure , density area are ,available so the intent'of the Housing Ruse can be met,: The proposed . redesiy: ation would: further . the City ° s c.:ompliallce with the:ie requireo,tetIte _ Reducing the allowed' density on the .property; ! as the ''hNP0 has recommended; would bring the City closer to non- compliar a With the Housing Rolle requirements.. Plan Policy 7'.1.2 xs satisfied because a4i0quat a public service capacities are available to .serve ;p tential developmen on the site at the Or^opc sed increased •denssty cis indicated by,, ..the comments of service providers. Storm sewer and sanitary Sewer will be necessary to serve the pimoperty. This can be accomplished as a condition of developing the site. Plan Policy 7.8.1 is satis'id'i9J because the Tigard school' Distriic't was informed of this proposal: The School Di, strict is presently constructing an addition to the. Durham Elertcntary' School and is dose reviewing proposed changes to scli of attendance boundaries. These actions are intended to alleviate overcrowding in. exi tin+g classrooms and to provide additional .capacity to serve ` future growth in the . .. � �, ; � ,. and City fe to plan for a sa �it o comctt�x is G l the .. Plan Policy 6 ► Z : ];, .� P efficient street and roadway system` that meets current needs and anticipated future development. This policy would be satisfied because , additional arntix'ipated { traffic resulting. from; the increased number of dwelling units that .could be developed on the site would not cause SW Naeve Street and adjacent streets to exced norm 6.1 traff it levels for their functional classifications. Sid Na eve Street and SW 'Sunz;neF!telc bri'r�u which s l ; cated to_ the soutni are both functionally classified as' minor cc`allector streets: SW 109th, Avenue at..1 other streets In • the area are functionally ol,r,iissif ied. as local streets $ STAFF REPORT CPA -02 (SANDERS) PAGE 5 9F. •a • 1�Y The r applicants'; , h'ave, subrnittedt, a preximinary t aff.1c analysis prepared by , Robert Keech ` and Ass,, ate consulting traffic en ineers . (Exhibit 2• This ',an, $3 cone "1`udes that, the, proposed g ��; 1 ,.w redesignation would be expected to result ten' additional 320' y i►�ehicular trips per ,;sday" from" the site` be'0 nd what 'would.'; be xpected under full ° development with the ex ;sting' zoning;. 'percent' of n these, affc analysis r�royects�,t that 3Q � ,. � ..-� Per tra P•� e r. day , would be ,anticipate`d`1 to a tra'�e1�� south an,d through thii ummerf geld planned r cohimuna rharn Roo >. The analysis ; pro jects`. 42 additional,' trips ,would trav estbound on gurnmerf�ield Drive Summerfiel.d ,,'Drive and .E30% e;,►'stbobnd . �;trxps on" , �u Although any additional traf f is on Swnicierfae'ld Drive , wi ? „,1 .be of; the , Summerfield G'ommunit; , the potentAal concern to �'residents ''of �.� `' ,the, ',Suggested traffic .additional traffic should ,;not result •' in �> �. The' suggested''. range of SW :�,� ►lmerfaeld Drive '. being a cceeded. , • as specified a by the. • traffic . r'ange, of minor . collector streets, Transportation section of the''. Cornprehensive' Plan, is. ' up to 3,099'. vehicle trips per . day.. The additional traffic also should no�t,; exceed the suggested traffic` , -range for SW 109th ` Avenue which ts' functionally classified by the Plan as 'a local street. The . Plan states that the suggested traffic range; of improved local` streets is up to 1,500 vehicle trips per day'. The traffic analysis projects that \ ►n ` additional 198 vehicle, + be anticipated from full trips westward on Naeve Sheet wools., '� ,� development at the propoL4ed density, as compared to full development at the current density opportunity appali)able to the Sanders' property. This additional traffic w is not anticipated to result in excee;:ing the suggested traffic range of SW, Naeve Street, a mnor^ , ollector street, or Pacific Highway whi.,c h is functionally classified as an arterial.. It. is noted,. `however, that any developre,it of the Sanders' pr•optrty, either with the density 'Unties of 'the current or proposed zoning, will likely • , r� mpovements to Naeve Street require off —site interim street r, both diro,ctions as well as improvements ta the .intersection lo f Naeve Street and Pacific Highway. . Because the►roporsed redes i,gnation would not result ,r►, norma1 traffic • . rany`es of adjaeent', streets iie'ing exceeded �by : Lr tff�i.c • ll units that c.ac.tid ,be :generated by the additional dwe'ling developed'd a nd also because the parcel as .served by an adequate network of minor^ collector streets anti an arterial, Ptah • Policy ould be satisfied ,if the 1,-s. 6: i .1 Would pr,opo�ed redesagn�itaan xs H '% aP9�r o`ied panic 6 ► l 3' �ui11 be satisfied 'as a condition o ~ �tppr�v ,l .o • 1 6: plan' y ti,ire de'ie lopment of the propErty . to N VhQ • u.;ir a h at the ettA sir rage. any fu •. dedication arwd street amproverrients woo g, iu time : The C ty' s ' Enga:rcee-r'ang Di.v as inn and .the 0regan Stat6 Highiway Di�viston well revi.eW any development :,Proposal. for tie' +4e S7`C�t =1= i EPoRT CPA 89 �02 %IC B9 —�2 (St bER ) ,w P E a LEGIBiUTY STRIP - ' • Plan Policy 8.2.2 is 'satisfied ki`ecause tTri -Met 'offers bus ,sera /zc on Pacific Highway less than one° °quarter mile from the property. The Locational Criteria specified in Chapter .12 of ::the Plan for Medium -High Density Residential use .: are `sz:tisfied far the following reasons The property is within] a ,Developing Area ".. i4iich is not con%mi.tted to low density deveiopnent. The proper z y is approximately, 400 feet from the nearest properties designated by the, Plan for single family residential use, future . development ` on the site would therefore be adequately separated from low- density . development thereby minimizing .the potential. for 04anflicts. C . The parcel t as dir:�ct accesa to Naeve -Street, a minor collector street, as :41211 as indirect access to Pacific Highway, an arterial street, as designated by ' the Comprehensive Plan's Transportation • Plat Map-. The parcel is less than 500 feet ; from Pacific Highway. . Se ' Serious development l imitations affecting •'she` site are not d . , v� , evident and public facilities can be extended to serve. the 1 property. • available on pacific Highway within a e Public transit is av quarter mile of the site. f. Convenience retail service is available. nearby along, Paci.fin Commercial and. business centers are located approximately 6.5 to 1 mile from the parcel. g, Property north of the site has slopes in excess of 25 percent that will be .difficult to develop and therefore • will _ likely 1y rema n as private open space . . Coi,too n o pen space n Irecreat,io na1 faci li ies • that ,cusomari ly, ' are , provided, with multi- fartii-ly, .development will also i like1 ,be provided as ,the +ect `property . is ,developed. is p he subl d No public open space is located 'within the vicinity of the-parcel. In order to approve' a quasi-- 3Udi,:ial° amendmertt to ,the Plan and 'Zoning Maps, the City must also find that there,.is•. evidence of a change in the neighborhood or community Which affects the subject . • partcel. Alternatively. the City must find that , there has beet, a mistake or. inconsistency Made' in the original designatian1'of the parcte': Policy 1.1.1, Imp1ec�aentattion Strategy 2; (Comprehensive Plan, Volgme 2�, ' Community Development Code Section 3.8 :22.040(A)). $taf► Concurs with the appl.icant's assertion that a mistake was made in dest.gnating, the Sanders' property with two Plan and zoning design ations splitting the parcel longitudinally. The, current split designations Makes, the'parce1 very difficult to develop because the allowable densities of the two ohs cannot be averaged over thci entire parcel. , The "staff ikiel,xeto3 that it Mould be better to distribute the snits th•oughoUt the site STAFR REPORT •- CPA 89- 02it 89-02 (SANDERS) PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT CPA tt ""stI/ZO 89'-02 (SANDERS , „ , 1j. u y 11, 1988 „ . • I , enders 56 Bents aoad NE CR 97002 ` Zoning Ofi1l165 SWiaeve , Street I , Pu have asked Whether the density limits impii)sed by the zoning :designaions applied tc.i. your parcel at 11165 SW Naeve Stree,t (tICTiti 2S1 10I), Tax ,!,r4ot. 600) May be avereged. The eastern 'half of this ‘parcel is .zoned 4-12 (PD) which allot-hi.' a maxl.mum , residential densi.ty of 3.2 units per:acre._ ' The Western portion of: the ■ 1 property,. is zoned R-25 (PD) which allows' q' ,niturt:iutg density 0E, 25 units pr acre. The zoning on the western half of the property was changed from It-12 (PD) to R-,;25 (PI)) by thd City COuncii. ois,APri.1, 13, 1987. j '', . ,.„ . . , A • Mix.trag , or ,averag.,./iig of allowed denSit' le& out' the different ohrtfous of tak - 600 is not permitted. Density alreraging would be taritamptint to a ,rezoaing , , • the eastern' half of the parcel withcatit the benefl.t of 'public rc,..v.i.ew, o2 he intensi.ficati.oit. 'Density averaging could -conceivably result , 112. illIpt4.-9 UpOtt [ 1 'properties adjacent to the easterrt portion of 'yotir ptoperty or ' 'upou eysttems I, • , such as transpoaitation or drainage, specificaIlY related to the eastern roottlian tpf the Property. , Because any increase in density on the (,..asterra hal.t Of tax lot 600 would reault' . , , , .1 . . la a 'denaitiv greater", thaal 12 units per acre*, a plan amendment ftr.)m Medium Density Residential •,(6 to 12 'Units/a(.re) to Medium-aliigh, Density l'tv"...sidential (13 to 25 units/acre) would . be necessary, as, well as , a zoning designatl.onh, „ , amendment. • The 'Ci.t3c-Couricil is the decision-Making body for plan 'amendments. The City Council will .consider plan ..,unentdments only at its Oett.,,bv.r and April meetings: Applications for plan amezilMento to be heard in October need A t be ". filed with the Planning bi.vision, no later than August 12. Appliatttion, for a plan amendment to be heard in April vaul4 need to be filed' by mie.-"P.T.t?AriiierY. . , . I A preffapplicati.ort conference with City staff 14. required 111..:,'tior ttsi filing 'ata application. The purpose of the conference lia tO alloW 1'110 t.tical,..4..trits and. ' staff to di.sctlas the application; tyltitaircatents and hearinit, 154/16'i/44s,, revisit , the, ' 42 ri teriti for a plait amendment, aud dit6uds, spEcif:Le lasthes that Would need to be addressed for a particular proi)erty. ' 'Of particula r concern .,, property wot2lci be the affects of inc.reased dztisity ';upon be roads in the area. Please contact me if yoni have any fun er qttest.i.o IS or would like schedule a , , , , . pre-appl.ication ,conference. , . Sincerely, , , . , . , 'erry 0 E'er Al,si.staat 1'11/trifler P -0 86x23397 /igcfrd 'Oregon 07123 (503) 639-41 • rW/ This application involves' a Conprahensive i�lan °Amendment from Mh Density Residential to Medium High Dennsity 'Residential an y a: fort Ci from R-12 (PD') to `R -25 (PD) for a ; 4 27 'Icre sitfe locata d.'eas Pacific Highway,, north of s, (Naeve st,reet and applroxi mate ly 4490 west of SW 109th Avenue. T The subject property is described as par Tax Lot 200 of Assessor's .Hap 2S1 10DB. This site and the 4.0 acre parcel west of and contiguous to th'h site i' under one ownership. However,•, the ;adjacent 4.0 acre' site fs�destgnatea in the Comprehensive Plants Ifediu n Hi h Density , Residential ` and zone .r R-25 ' (PD) (Multifamil Y ,residential, 25 units pt;r' acre, plannee Development) . This application- seeks to make the zoning of :the entire pro erty. owr�od hl. Mr Sanders cor istent. Ira 1987, " ax Dot 300 .and ��on' part', of 'Tax dot; 200 were re oned from 2 to Rdi9.: Resident al with corresponding Plan :.,0b4000", from tied i,um' to ned ium-H gh Dena i!; Residenti.al: Havi,n art - of 'fax Lot 200 zoned 14-1 end the retnain'i 9 p ng pant zoned Eiw makes mark Ling the parcel a difficult task as : ach letter from ,Paul K. 'Bart�i ©lens of Cbl.��mbia Egui ties �ia " Novo 21 r 19 A8. One of the ' r �asons g ten 'by Mr . • ®arthoiemy ' for rest+ind i tag offer to purchase the subject property was the split Z.0 i0 This report has been prepared on behal' of William » Sanders Tax Lot 200, 8.27 acres Tax Lot 200 has been use as a nursery . years and it presently con tai, s a residence and several o iIl 1t This report will demonstrate that this Cat,ion iw cons the � policies of the City of !Tigad's Comprehensive P I cr,iteria 'n Chapter. 12 0f t;he Pan, volume >� 2 , provis ions + Community Development Code aria': i'he app'°licable ' "St'atewide Flannin and Guidelines. BACKGROUND INFORMATION in December :1S$6, yhe Tigard C'1ty , nr gave coil diona approva the Albertson 's ,Cmprehensi e Plan AMerdmen or c1\anging:.the zoning the southeast ,corner of Durham Road and aciric H,ig1`tway. I ■roposa l;,i, . involved rezoning these . properties from High Densit3r Residefti'al commercial. The result of the decision was the :removal if about 4i potential housing units from Tigard' s Inventor y gf j'buildable ""land'." order to meet the Metropolitan ,housing Rule adoptedr' by thy; 7LCDC, ,t The A c .bP..(t on's CPA was gra nted on the condition of .n reonng suffiien residentially zoned land to' make up for.:*he °shortfall, create by .this decsion. , The rezoning of Tax .Lot Sao and part :of Tax Lot 200 ?�,, were part of the City's attempt i to • maintain compYiunce with the, . er net acre Metropolitan Housing Rule of 10 units,p The skte contains a residence and several outbuildings and has approxhately 220 feet of frontage along Waeve Street To the north is Little Bull Mountain, to .the South is he F ontaIns a' summerfie)d and the properties east and west of the site are i''currentl vsoante The propor t es t north are presently zoned R7.'i . ; he , + 1 t1 i1011; s King City'c:9re to' the west (across Pacific Aighwayi The propetties'' the south arc zone C ° -r (General, Commercial) and t -2S. The property he east is zoned R- 1 urther east the Pro et is ,zoned' 5 t •� 4 PHYSICAL FEATURES The property slopes generaily. southerly a slope across the site of approxitnatel l' +;i2% wester: with an .avera The site :ontains deciduous , and conifer tees. The more quality tree' are located at t:ie northern portion of the site. i!art of the, front portion of the site is cleare PUBLIC FACILITIES Sanitary' Sewers sanitax` sewer service is available r an runs extended from an 8" sanitary sewer line � .thot �•tu the intersect ton , on o 109th Avenue and Nave Street. can Water Service: Water service to th e site is PrOvided b y he Tigard d Water District, , which has an 80 main located at the intersection of 109th Avenue and Naeve Str�+pt. The T , igated __ �c,�igd' T�att;, District has infix that a water main would need to be extended tt serve the site. The District has iaLicated that an easement would need to he obtained from the abutting tax lot to the east, Tax riot 100, to extend the water main to the site. This would be done at the time the property Is developed, orm Sewers: Store, d ainay can be providc,a ► �w ' .•a t sting 30" - the 9th. Avenue and Naeve 30 storm seder ln��• at he �rirersectz��► flc 0 Street. St pp ly 2201 of frontage along Naeve Street Streets: The site has approximately re mate. and is 'approximately 700° from pacific, Highway. Partial street improvements have been completed along Naeve Street•as a. result' o. the "develcipment of the ; ountaiAs at Srammerf ie ld Condom 'mums across;- from the site. At the time the $ub;aect property is developed, . ddi.ticnal .street improvements along ;Naa..,ve Street vill be required. A. pre;1im3.nary traffic analysis ri11 be submitted to . illustra.te t' he general traffic patterns that would occ the R -12 versus the R - drys e °site were de+elope COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES City staff, has provided the applicant with a list of the ,appropriate City Plan policies, 10rational criiter..a5 Comuunity` Development Code provisions and applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines' to be addressed. These are Ydsesented and evaluated below. POLICY 2.1.1' THE CITY SH Lh ?� NTAIN AN OCR ` NVOLVEHEQ�`!` PROGRAM' AND SHALL GCIY �iG C1 TI �Eid ! ASSURE THAT CITIZENS �TIGL BE PROV'YDED .A�4 OPPORTUNITY TO HE Y'NVO ALL PHASES OE THE PLAN1v�NG PROCESS. tomment: Pa rt of the nppl icut c'n pLIcess ' involves public hearings before both the Plan7irt: Commission and City Council after appropriate I gal: =:otice to the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding Property owrdxs. These public he arin g s will ll provide t he o pportuni Y folk citizen input regarding this proposal. P)LICY 5.1.1 iris DEN! I'CY SHALL 'PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR A DIVERSITY OF 1 "'JUS1N ;ITIES AN P711SIDENTIAL TYPE; AT VARIOUS' PRICE AND RENT LEVELS, Comment: Acc�ordi�g to Gty ��taff, the pity is'` obligated through the p g ,p mix of single anvil r an tan Eiot�.a a h Rut fob � r Me tra ol, i e' o cOv ide atta(!h d *.nits with an over l �levelopme�nt �ensit , of • 10 'units per afire b , Tile City` must ensure, that suific „icnt`'hlgher dens .t;y yeas are avail „rb1e so the iht�: t of the housing: rule care be me -acreage tai higher density;, housing;'willl result in adds units or :those cemmunity mbmbers in the marke more affordable h using. POLICY O 7.L2 I I I x I^ T, uuAT• *' �ii M A...� PPR O. L'L REQUIRE, AS A PRE .CONDLmION,,TO ,I?E.. __'O2MEN't, A► �, ^ >.. THE CI`�Y,,Sb�.� a. DEVELOPMENT COINCIDE WITH THE AVAILABILITY` OF ADEQUATE SERVICE CAPACITY' INCLUDING: • PUBLIC WATER; ( • PUBLIC SEVER Q''IEW . DEVELOPMENTO r . SEPTIC ''TANKS SMALL . NOT I ,4 ALLOWED WITHIN THE CITY); D i . STORM DRAINAGE s' CAPABLE OF ADEQUATELY SERVING' AL_L INTERVENING PROPERTIES, AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT; Il1N'D . DESIGNED TO CITY STANDARDS. . ALL NEW DEVEi1OPNENT UTILYTIES TO gE PLACED, UNDERGROUND:' or Cemment: As previously disussed, this policy is eat s ied , , beca' Lse* •, vilable orl' can. a, exte' p ridei,�' t+� adequate service ca ac�,tge a ,:. -� 4 e are .� serve -the sF;tO, Utility ,extesisio ►s (i.e.' Sew,�r, Water and tnrm) ciin be provided to seri,e the propert ` at the time 62 development POLICY 7.8: THE CITi SHALL WORK CLOSEL °3C WITH TIES .. ,ASS' , � CHOQL . DISTRI`GTS � T MAXIMUM COLIMUNITY l S S OF THE SCHOOL FACILITIES .FOR TI�GARD RESIDEht '. T'HROUGH LOCATI ONAL CRITERIA AND THE "ROV S I ON SEM/I C Comment: Tigart7 School District 23S provida,s 'educational serV,?.ces or,' this, site. Templeton Grade, Twality. Junior High and Tigard, H igh 5cl/,aoo1s' serve this site at this time. According to the SchOol District, additiona l. clMsrooms have added to two grade ; school�' . in the d stz ict , plus a new grade school is under ,construction at Durham: There fora 8 adequate school facilities are available to serve . this site: POLICY THE CIT:t SHALL PROVIDE FOR EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS WITHIN- THE CITY AND THE METROPOLIAN AEA THROUGH COOPERATION WITH OTHER FEDERAL, STATE, REGIONAL AND LOCAL JURI�►::4CTIO S. The ct property Is served'by Naeve Street, a minor Comment: t , he subye p p, y collector and Pacific Hichway, a `mnior arterial. At the time the site, is developed, street improvements a1on+, Naeve Street to Pacific Highway will be requir'.d as well as addition 41 right -of -way. Bus service is provided neaµY ,, 4 site along Pacific Highway. APPLICABLE LCDC GOALS AND GUIDELINES GOAT, 01: DEVELOP A CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM THAT ENSUES Til'E r L A � OF T QP� TUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO GET INVOLVED IN AL SPECTS � � THE PI.AgNING PROCESS. Cos�r�ent: Part of the a lication pf p • Pp ves ubl �c hiearangs oce s anvol s before bol`,h the P1 In Commission and City �Cau cil , ft.er appropriate egal, notiC0 to the' Neighbo hood Planning X91 ;gan i�',ation and su oundin4, These public hearings will provide +: the 'opportunit, for citiz Input x'e arding this proposal. GOAL. U: LEST BLiSH ,A LAND USE ;PLANN'ING ?RO,CE ME D BASIS 0F ALL LiRD, USE 1iECISit�NS �VDAC'i`,�� FACTUAL DATA RASES TO SUBSTANTIATE THOSE DECI AND POLI, Y FI AMEWORK" A 1+. 1D, ENSURE AN ADEQuAT 14.ND ACTIONS. Comnent: This goal is met, as this application .is ' allowing 'the process'; • g olii:i and: aaldi�essan, t�',; p " �•es and criteria specified bY the ,,.City. GOAL 110: PROVIDE AO,EQUATE HOUSING FOR THE' NEEDS . OF THE ` COMMUNITY, REGION AND STATE'. Comment: In orde.� to provide adequate housi,.Ag, ' there needs to be ;' an ap iortunity to allow various housing types on undeveloped land; sthg e° f Amil.Y a4s well as multifami ly housing. llowing a higher density of residential development on this . site will allow the opprrtunity for affordable !housing in the communit; . The Metropolitan Housing rule adopted by LCDC requires a minimum. of 1d units per net acre. According to City staff,,, �. a4 d w i designations currently in the Plan ' just reaa; : this target. •App1oval of the application increases housing density potential within,,. the Citl►, complies 'with, the purposes of Goal 10 and benefits the City °s .9 Providing for a min of hrrusing opportunities. • p g 9 ;' LOCATIONAL CRITERIA The Locational C,titeria in Chapter 12 of the Plan are satin; dOscribed below. ded i:um--h .. • igh and High 1Dea�sa�t� Residential . The property is Within a "Dcveloping Area" which committed to low density development. The de telopment "� outs the Site' Is designated In the Plan , Heaiuln- i h es en 1 and zoned R-2S. propert.i cou d a ba ffered from' Low Density Ye`si.d'ential areas' in ' rder. to itaxirna:ze the " pr,i.vacy�'of �, ow .density r;esidentiai areas t;hrough design, how ver, there 1 0w denslkty developments adjacent to the site.° • Tile Parcel has •Mzect access to Naeve. Streiet, .a minor collector, and Ys approximately 700 feat from :Pacific' Highwa j°r arterials t. • There are no apPar nt development limitations on this site. • As noted previously, pubLic facilities „tncludinq saa'i ary sewer, storm ara water services are available anq can be extended, to serve the property. r Thr: site is veil within one mile, of public transit; Tri-Met bus service locat44d off of Pacific Highway, approximately 100,1 ' from the sate. The site is within one - qua,rtJ�r mile of an area that is zoned and developed ari C--P (Commercial- Professional) north and west of the property along Pacific Highway. The site is also within 250 of an area that is zoned Genera's.- Commercial which is southwest of the property. ,. Pro ert north of the site has p , therefore � p y s s10 es that exceed ��'� , t that property will have the potential for having either private or public open space. The provisions of the Community Development Code will be addressed at the time tae site is developed. e vz iter ia `both a Zo a change ; o Sian Amendment: from et ium to Medium -H he requested designs n s iil' alls Jodi tonal multifamily housing in c x,t is i portant. 'to no that the zone A nclude R.. Deveiopm nt ova 'T is ,means 14. any development 'will.' be a reviewed by the , i'laz ing Co;a ai siai�o sa, ti VAS . p ese v ng °tai the greatest a ttent po4sible e existia s lar soa�pe 'features' and amen it -ies and waxiros7,ing the .opp©r un .ti=es for innovative and diversified wing ,"environments This requested plan ' designation will :also x mbz;e 'the use of ava lable public facilities, transit and transportation networks Foy these reasons,, we request, that this a lication be. approved. PUBLIC IIERMING CLOSED ® Commissioner I Castile favored the ' proposal with conditions proposed at the previous hearing. Be felt that this wa not a normal right.-Of-way. xa_ Commissioner Saporta had previously opposed'; the request, however,,. after visiting the site he felt it would be difficult to construct a ,other type of sign- Be favored the proposal with condition3 previously proposed. Commissioners Rosborough, :v . -nett and Fire agreed and favored ':he �omm3s .�a proposal. Commissioner 'Barber and Peterson opposed the Proposal. They did not feel u sign should be permitted in t1 .. public right -of -way. Commissioner: Castile moved and Co tw issioner Saporta seconded to approve SCE 89 -04 and V 89 -04 with the following conditions: tfil .. The existing sign is to be Xemoved., 2. The new sign will be constructed. _ ® proposed. 3. The electrical line will be moved. 4. The sign will be subject to, a 1, c en ®� S. The applicant will obtain _a street opening permit. 6. No freeway oriented sign will bm Permitted on the site. Notion ' Passed by majority of Commissioners , present. t,eommissioners. , Farber and Peterson voting no. 5.2 , st S , l CPA . 8g 2, ., IsC• 89-02 R S CRUNKNiNG RESOURCES, INC.) rPr J' Request for a comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Dcmsit Residential ed w�3gh Density ity Residenti al and a Zone Change from (Residential, ��ita /acre ) to 21-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) for approximately 4.27 acres. The P remainder of the parcel is designated Eediam-High Density Residential and is zoned R -25. LO TIO : Eastern half of 11165 SW Naeve ,Street `Iwcri'°M 281 10DB, eastern half of tax lot 200) . Senior Planner Liden reviewad the pr; ,sal and made staff's recommendation for approval. Adding that the p- eimary ccnceri was for , tranaportationn and the effect it would have on SumMerfield. Discussion 'followed with ComaaisA18ioners regarding the history around the rezoning of the Alberteons site and how the property ended up with a split zone. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION ' Rill Sanders, 22362 Bents Street NS, Auroral OR 97002, explained that their representative had not arrived and they would lid the opportunity for hit to be ale to speak. Be stated that they had Purchased the property in 1950 and had operated' a ntraory bussineen until 1975 when the State took away their water rights. Mow they were trying to 'bell the Property and finding it difficult becauai of the Split zoning., Pe y ng i PLANNING CO . LL ... ,.. SICiYd EaNUTES - APRIL _ ... 4 d 1989 dC UJ LIC THST. o Da,e Atkinson, 10460 Std century Oak Drive, Tigard, ;OR 1 97224, . a vusmerfi.e17.d' resident, stated he had been involved in the •dense3ty planning process for eleven Years,. Hif primary concern was • for traffic. He stated that Naevee •Read at ],99th had been intended to be block off to protect the 'residential • area of Su steer ield. 4(e a kplaineed that Suaame rfield i;s Iunigne and 'because of the golf cart traffic does not have', 'normal traffic patterns. He disagreed with staff's estimate regarding' traffic. .e questioned. why ' # 6 was' reee ires3d to absorb the Increased densities ream ting from the rezoning of the ,Albertson a r' development. m Jane Hiller, 10920 eV Highland, Tigard ■ Cat 97224, agreed with Dave Atkinson and added that both she and Dave had sewed on # 6 when the Compr'ehonsive Plan was first implemented. she opposed increasing the den ity cause of the traffic impact to Swmnerf field. she read a. portion of a letter which had been directed to Phil Pastes i.a, former '.!',720 6 Chairperson, from giddy Wooley, City Engineer,; regarding traffic concerns She read and submitted into the r�acerd a petition from the residents• of the Fountains opposing the density changes Rick Givens, Planning Reesourcese, Inc.(' 3681 SW Carmen, Lame Oswego, Or, 9703S, representing the Sonders, reviewed the proposal and 'difficulties pW •.t zoning. He stated that their goal they were encountering w %.�° >Y the �► g was not to increase density but to allow for homogesheous development. The roads are designed to handled the proposed density. He added that tha ad'Joining property had been purchased' by a church which 1 dicat'','1 that it will Probably be development as a church facilit y. ta c ®nes7 � �,,d,ed hat the density re aao- ted ie compatible with the surrounding area and r equestee that the Planning Commission recommend approval. Discus ion followed with ; taff and the commission vegardi ng , ths, split zoning, approval criteria,. approval based on specific plan, and. 'blocking, off 109ta and 'da No Pad PUBLIC BILIRING CLOSBD Consensus of the Commission was to followed regarding the possibility combining the densities, which would entire lsi tee. . Discussion on the type' Commissioner Castile moved and recommend denial of CPA 89 -52 and SC Commissioners present. leave the zoning .as is. Discuss n of allowing the site to deevele,p bY allow 15 to 18 units` per acre for the of recQmemandation that could he made. commissioner Leverett seconded to 89 --02. Motion carried unaniuely ' .. ; : er Peterson gautd a � the comiesioner casitile moved and Commi .. sion to city council that seome type of Method b density and alloy` development of 15 units per acre over the entire site to allow for a uniform develops eft. motion carried by' majority of Commissioners pre ssantd CoMminaioners Barber, Hodbb orou g h , and Saporta voting no. PLIMNILIG COMNISSXON &4f ._ . ..S j- APntla 4/ 1989 P 3 i (T �,.�� P.O. box 23713, Tigard, OR 9223 Planning Commission City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 We, the undersigned, do not want the Planning Commission to approve a density change for the property whose boundary is along Naeve Road from R-12 to R-25 Most of us moved to the Summerfield area because it was quiet and we felt safe walidng around our g� you approve density increase traffic through the neighborhoods. ve tkias densi encr�a�►e them feel this s unsaffe � • � anr. h If add towards Durham Road and we fee and unf a i Tigard has Se�eld area headed already approved many new apartment complexes along Durham Road which have had a negative impact on our area and we hope you will have concern for the residents of Summerfield. and not approve any additional increase in density. Thank you. Fountains Condominium Association Unit Owners truktzt,e, • l,and'Use& Site Planning Services.' 3681: S.W. arrnan Dries ' Qregon 97035` (5C,�3) 636'5422 March 7, '1989 e' a r � Planner Offer, , AsS ®c iat e P.O. Box ` 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 The William Sanders cumprehtms ive Plan Amendment and Zone Change Appliccetions Dear Mr. Of fer T'i �.�ie applicant is e9ate of the concern regarding the potential tixaffic impact phis application maay have on the. adjoining neighbo hooiMl therefore 'a 'preliminary traffic analysis has .been completed and' 'is submitted 'to yrau. The taps and docu ante on resulting from this , analysis are attached. w. The total daily generated traffic resulting from the current' zoning. would be 876 trips day, The total daily generated trips, resulting from the proposed 'zone change would be 1195, for al difference of X19. .he L'nfessional ud ement Of the cr�::nsulting itraffic engineer that O t i s 9' 4 � 9 approximately two - thirds of the! Paci f ac traf yfic will travel t o the n orth Hi h�ta eand the re�iniu 9 one ttird of , the t of f is wi11 tra veon 'A toward 109th Avnue, disp ersin g to L ie ea st nd south�estb ' e difference in impaci on local, streets between' the project develop ng under existing versus proposed zoning is 4Z additional trips on Su serf field west- bound and 80 additional ;trips on Suu ierfield east -bound from Highland. Because this traffic is,,dispersed over 'several streets the overall affect of this proposed change should' regain within 'the normal range for local streets . me - of the total number of t, r ips generate d fr om y � a p ro % a se one Cha nge an Com rehensive plan Amendment the naJOr t y wild oravel to�ard k ac�fi c Eli hwa and not throw h the existin nei hbo hoods: If you have any questions regarding this report,. phase contact our'; office. Lori Hastrantonlo planner LEGIBILITY STOCIP irk Tellitf Pte. . ` Writi Fv a F JUS "'FED , DAILY VEHICL I1 ►� TED TRANSIT USE: �dUSTED DAILY Vffizsc E ► ?a, DAILY GENERATED TI RCERTA_ GE OP TRIPS OCCURING ING WEAK Haurtur GENERATED TRIPS: 'TE4 TRIP SPLIT: rRAPPFIC VOLUME Iii RA FIC ,VOL OUT: plaRcErfrriGa np: TRIPS'OCCuRING DURIIM .4 �l PM P inURLY GENERATED .TRIPS: ' trips /hour PM ENTER eTHIP SPLIT: 0 a 68 in/total PM TRAFFIC VOLUME Igo a trips /sour PM TRAFFIC VOLUME 30 trips/hour Source: 4th edition Trip Generation g ITE, 1987) or s I'EUSE SITE SIZ JUSTE. DAILY VEHICLE ' T IP :S TIMA'TED , TRANSIT USE: DJUSTEC P I Y .VEHICL,E TRIP GENEMTIO ® 'AL, DAILY 'GENLRATED. Tp ;IPS cENTA0E0F.TRIPS.00cuRING PEAK H LY 'GENERATED TEL) TRIPS: ENTER ,TRIP SPLIT w. Am TRAFFIC VOL TRAFFIC VOLUME PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS CURING ' DURING PM PEAK H. LY GENERATED TRIPS: PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: PM 'TRAFFIC VOLUME If FM TRAFFIC VOLUME WT: Y: Source: 4th edition 6TriP Generation' (I°TE LEGIBILITY STRIP NORTH 611b1�.�:.'Li Avg. i'iir141 Of W. 0:-.x:111 -C Fr 1 ,r ari a MUM, `:aHEARING commies;Loner Castile favored the proposal with conditions previous hearing. He felt that this was not ra'nom al 'rigbt-ca'"' at the Comas ®sooner ' Saporta had ; previously opposed the request, 'however, after visi inc ; he site" he felt it would be ` dif f it nit to construct another „type, Wow it 060e « > He favored the proposal vid:th condi;cione' Previously. Proposed Commissioners Rosborou h, Leverett, and. re war and favored the g Py gr prop pal « ieaioner Zarber and ?eterson ' o PIS seed the proposay,.. TheY did °n a ot � el a '`sign should be permitted in the :'public right- of -wad` • Commissioner Castile moved and Commissioner Saporta seconded to a &+prove SCE 89 -04 and V 89-04 with th following conditions:; :? a The existing sign is to he removed. « ,'The , new sign will be constructed as propose l 3. The electrical line will be ` moved- . The sign will be subject to .a license. 5. The applicant will obtain a street' opening permit. 6. No freeway crg'L rated 'sign will be Permitted on the atte. Zf tion passed by majority of Coumaiseio lere , present « comroiersianers Herber and Peterson voting no. , nmtir,r �rM�P••sfa rf_�ya ,Y t:!,y'^NW,. W ra,. f+g:, MP'"`4'A.eV,ww:"wM . t.:' Mru W .u...ry,yq.Wp,M r• K"°�q '.. i4 A�., +w wN-+ti w,;s :t* p'rl*ye'!'vp�y ..... . f .1' ' / N�{ UM��!V."';F'. f� + °N r. a Y a , I ,��r Request for a Ccmpr pensive ,plan Amendr��ent f , � µ,+ M.., „a4.� .�,.w l t o i4e iium- High . Density 1V � eduua Densi�, i:esie�er�tia h134 , from. R -12 (Roe r y Resid�x�tial and a Zone �"�.� a ideaati�t�, 12 unit® /acre to. R-25 (��esid� ntial,y 25 units/acre) designated medium-High ieDensit ate ®idrn�tia;�. and R remand r of the ..: 1, y is zoned P -25. LOCATION: a Eastern .. half of 1116#: SW haeve Street (WCTZ4 2S1 10DB, eastern half of tax lot 200). Senior Planner Lidem reviewed the proposal and made sta..ff • 8 recoWmendatior for approval. Adding that the primary concern woo for trans station and the effect it would have nn summer with r�ielrol. Discussion fullow�ed Commissioners regarding the history around th a rezoning of theiAlbertsons' site and how the property ended sip with a split zone. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Hill Sanders. 22362 2�i2 Aents Street NE, Auror:a, OR 97Q02 e�plaineaa that their repreuentative had not arrived and they would like the opportunity for him to be able to speak. He stated that they had it %rcbatied ` the property in 1950 and had opea:ated e. nursery business until. l973, when the State took away their Water rights. Now they were try.ng I` to sell the property and finding it difficult because of the split zoning. PLANNING coOmassIoN MINUTES - APItIt 4, 148 + PAGE 4 ti • ci6 Fe. • , voitid ,•, Dave Atkinson, 10460 SW Century Oak Drive, TLgard, OR 97224,,a Sammerfield resident, stated he had beet!' involved in the deneity planninw,process for eieven years. Hie primary concern was for traffid. ., He stated: that $aeve Road at 109th had been intervded to be block off to protee.; the ;residential, area of Summerfield. He explittned that SumMerfield Je urique and because of the golf cart, traffic f1O641,,' not have normal, tiafflo patterne. Be dis2:4reed with if taff's estimate regarding traffic. He, questioned, why' NPO 6 was rewired to absorb IiI7a.14 increased densities xesulting frOm the 'ezoning of the Albertsons' development. Jane Miller, 10920 SW Highland, Tigard, OR 97224, agreed with Dave Atki4lsos and .addad, tact both She and Dave had served' on EPO # 6 vien the ' comprehitInsive P1an was tirat iraplemetnted.. She opposed increagimg the' density because of the traffic impact' to SumMerfield. She read a portion of a letter which had been 6irected to ',,,%?hi,1 pasteris, former NP1D # 6 Chairperson, from Reedy tlooleY, City Engineer, regarding traffic" concernee• • she read and submitted int° tha record a petition from the resident* of the Fountains opposing the denn:tt3r. cholegos• o Rick Givens, Planning Reaourcef, Inc., 3681 SW Carmen, Lake Oswego, or, 97035, representing the Sanders,: 'reviewed the Ps2oPosal and difficulties, they were -encountering with the split zoning. 88 stated that 'their goal was not to iniercaaive 'density,' but to allow fOr hon,Ogeneoun development. • TI‘e roads are deSigned to .handled the ProPosed densitlre Re added that the adjoining; Property had been Purchased by a church whIcS indicate* that it will prob&bly be development ms a church facility. As, concluded that the denaitY re4ueated in ccmP,stible wtth the' 0nrronp2iala area and requeeted that *the PlInniRg C"7"mmieeicn recommend approval. o piwcuesion fO11ozei With 4taff and the Oommireision regardiOg the spi,it ronliag, approval Criteria, apprcval based on specific Plan, and blocking . off 109th and Haeve Road. PIT,SBT.IC HaARING cti.OSRD o Cc)neeeeus' of the ccmiillsi-orl vias to leave tt• zoning as is. 0 Disduasidn followed regarding the PosaihilitY of allowing the Fil.te, tr) develop by • combining the densitiee, which would allow 15 to 18 unite Pelt acre for the entire site. Discussion an the typ e of recommendation thait., could be made . dommialtioaat tila moved and domOisaider lever'6tt ' Red-ended :t° recommend denial of tPA 00-02', and ZC 89-624: - moti6a oittiold 'UnanimOnaly- , • °'1111mi0Bi°neta Pteeleht' , •,. , • Commissioner adti1e Moved and OOMM2taSiOner ,Peteraen, SecOlided',,te reCCOMend1,1 tO tliAty Council that 61°Elie tY'Pe! Of Iatirthotid be. s.ititio60 cUt to average the density and allow', develoPtaerit1 of 15 unite Per H acre ',over ' the entire' bite to allow for a uniform tle%relOpMent. flotiofl cartied',bio tiadokitY, Of'. COMMiL3ESioners PrealB)nt- C°111nieRi°11`3rnI Barber, Roebol:otig,i, 0111c1 sePorta„ voting no. I , pLannixIcG ameassIce if-114012S Akt11. At, 1989 PAGE '3 FACTS 1. General Informatio,n I CASE: Comprehensive .Plael Amendment CPA 89-02, „Zone Cl.tange ZC 89-02, I/EQkJEST: Ci-.)ini:)r.ehenSivia Plan Map Amendment from Medium Densxty Residential to Med'i.us1,-Higl'i Density Residential' and , a Zone Change from R-42 (PD) (Multi.*—Family ResiclentiLal,',` 12 units per acre, Planned Development) to R-25 (PD) (141Ulti--Pamiy Residential, 25 units per acre, Planned 1Devei`t3pmerl±:) for approximately 4.27 acres'. APPLICANT: Planning Resources, Inc. OWNER William C. C.I.air.e Sanders 3681 SW carman t)tr.itre 1 2236 Bents Sirreet,f.'.:1E. Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Aurora, OR 97602 ' 1 Western half of 11165 SW Naelie Sti'-eet (WCTM 2S1 10C)13, tax lot 200). 2. Background round Information , This parcel and adjacent parcels were annexed to the City of Tic!Avti in 1981 with a Washington County zoning designation of RU-4 (Residential, 4 units/acre). City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 1-811 approved redesigrlatic)n of the entire parcel from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and a zone change to R12 (Residential, 12 wits/acre). The Planned Development ,PD) overilly zone was added to the requested R-1/ designation s� that all development proposIls 'Oar the property would be required to be reviewed by the Planning Coniati.ssion. In December 1986, the Tigard City Council gave conditional approval to the Albertson's Comprehensive Plan. Amendment for changing the Pion designation of several properties located at the southeast corner crP Durham Road and Pacific Highway, This approval redesignated these properties from latigh ,,Density Residential to General Commercial. The result of this decision Was the removal of the opportunity for approximately 400 potential multi—family housing Units froO, Tigard's inventory of vacant, buildable land. The Metropolitan Hditsing Rule (Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 660, DiVision 7) requires that Tigard provide, a housing opportUnity for at least 50 percent" Multi—family Units and a net minimum hoUsing density of 10 , I , sAr■ibtri•sN . pi u`riits per acre on vacant buildable eland wi r%in' the City' �3rban, Planning Area The Albertson' CDA •was :granted on the condz'f�on o¢�, redesi nation of sufficient resitle�ntialc land to higher den sits s to " ",tyl g o ortrurl ty ..shor�.f a1 . created b;/ the: ;dc make' up for the M�ous ing pp Several. sites throughout t includitng • the subject .p Ir‘cei.y. were l den:; itie; :o, make up , for the, considered' for increased res iden�La, .l;bertson's disci sign . � The housing opportunity shortfall created, w ,�y the . western :''half of the subject' property and the ''parcel to the west were proposed for Plan /zone redesignation frcm" Medium (CPA ey Residential / R--12 (P0) to Medium -High ,. Density Residential /R -25 (P0) PA` 87- 07(G) /ZC 87•- 02(G)) .. No change in dev jgnation was propo eastern, half of the Sanders' parcel. The proposed redesiejriation of the western half of the property and the adjacent parcel wa,f a PP the City Council on April 13, 1987. use a" li.'cati:ons regarding this parcel have been r,eviewe Na other land pP " :; by the City. ° Vicinity Information' The Sanders' property is surrounded lay ° the following i trictst R -25 (PD) (Residential,'' 25 units /acre,' Planned Development) and south; CeG ',PD) (General Commercial: P1a sled Development) , to the �. Resdentta�,;, southwest; `k -w55 to " the ' southeast, and R -12 (P0) 12 units /acre, "Tanned Development)to the north. Parcels to the west, . east, and north are undeveloped, tree -- cowered, and together With the � subject parcel form the southern slope of L.ittle Bull Mountain. of the The , Fountains at Sr.�mmerfieid condominiums ars locited directly . ou .... Sanders' propert) To the southwest ar <! several undeveloped parcels as well as Hectors Nursery which fronts on Pacific Highway. 220 feet of frontage" on Naeve Tho Sanders property has approximately Street .Naeve Street is designated as a minor collector street by . the City's Transportation Plan Map. Naeve Street is generally substandard in width and in state of i.mprovements, with the exception rom the frontage of the fi=ountains at Sumrerfie�ld directly across street 30 feet of Sanders' property, Half improvements including. pavement, curbs, a seciewalk, and streetlights have been ins sa ed along P The developers of the Fountain the Fountains' frocataige . also installed 0 20 foot wide i.nterim road surface westward to Naeve Street's inteesection with Pacific Highway. : ximate • • � .ed : a ro y cat Pacific Highway, a four —lane dx,�xro e � �et^iA1�l.eft`lo RP 500 feet west of the, Sanders property. p y:• turn lane onto Naeve traffic , The intersection of � Naee Street: outhbound �. � ... `;+ . e i s pr•rsV �. ed for s Street and Pacific Highway �.�� ..not signalx�ed SW 109th Ar•�enue is r South of th approximately 450 feet east of the property, intersection, S 1 1091 �... dine into nt .. enue is ' a� ir►�praued street lea 109th A1d fully the Summerfield planned comminity with connections east and west leaGi to g to Durham Road, SW 109th, Avenue, north of the intersection with Naeve Street, is a steep` gravel' read extending appro tirnately 1,200 feet to a dead eiid . SW 109th Avenue continues appr'oximately 200 feet STAFF REPORT -- CPA 6 - �02 /ZC 89--+ 2 (ANDERS) - PAGI r \. M, the;r, na'rth. the' de`�ad end . Thi:s no,thern section Qf w1w cY+D .� � �t11 venue,' extend;, northward too segments cif' SW 9,�9th to die° c�nne ted °xn p t r.rturi7 i 1,te Information. and Proposal,' Description ax ;lot 2go, is an ' R.' 27 ',acre parcel. Presently *tdev,eloped with on ing ,e family resaderrce and several r outbul ldings propse�"ty £ 1Op' ger�era1.ly, to 'the' south and, wes'c ,with;; .►n ' average' grade o 1,2, percent. The property formerly ' "was. 'used! as 'a nursery.' ',The " site is (,,most1lytl. wooded. with a combination 16f `evergreen ar') deciduous i., ees. 'The ".lamest 'trees; are oh the, , northernmost portion `,, o }P the proper y . : i hey; `hst • portion of the property, ' etwe'n' the house and fae a ,Str soui. er fet, is mosnmatly. open. v The property is presently; served by a septic s m and a 1 w sanitary, sewer and a storm sewer are located ,nearby' at the; * t =r i sctien of SW IUaeve Street. and 3W ',1 09th Avenue. :An :8; --inch diameter' Wa`er° main is Located along Naeve Street. The Sanders' property presently has s,pli't a Plan a`asad zoning designations. The western "4.0 acres " is +e,signated Medium- -High ty Residential by the Compreherasive 'Plan 'Map and is 'zoned,', 5 2S '(PD)• T► e eastern 4.27 acres is designated Medium' Density' Reside+,tial. and �.� zoned R-12, (PD) . The applicants request that the .eastern 4.27 acPes be redesignated teed ium —High Density Res i.den al and ..,,,be rezoned, R-25" '(PP) . The applicants cite di.ffi.ct 1t]e . Th � � s �.h marl�.etir7g the , prop�er'�ty for development purposes because of Lthe split designation. The Plannir � , , Division has previously responded to the, owners' and potentxaii developers' inquiries" ' regarding the, ' ''po;ss.ibility of F. averaging the, allowed densities for the two portions Of the parcel with u an interpretation' this .' aver^agz,n; was not potsib1e,, (Exhibit 1 : 1u1y li +, 1988, letter to William Sanders from Jerry )ffer.) lj a . A ,ncy and NP(i Comments The Engineering Division as reviewed the �oposal and offered the follot4ing comments The subject site Fronts' onto SW INaeve Street, a largely unimproved minor collector street. Improvements to Native. Street would be required as ' a 'conditions of any devel.oprent of the property. The improved roadway should provide' adequate vehicular access for the site at the increa3e densi ty :. rouements would have Sanitary ,sealer and storm drainage �.mp m to be etttended from existing manholes at SW, Naeve Street and SW 149th Avenue: The sanitary sewer, system is capable f providing the necessary service at the requested increased ,density • The existing storm drainage ,blystem,, Mould be required to be evaluated as a ,condition o development of the site Increased deg.? i�y uiil;l typically increase runoff slightly but the overall irirplct on runoff from this site should be minimal. S`tAI+'F REPORT CPA s9 -2 /ZC 89- 2 (:S iNDER' ) PA 1: e,'Oregon,,Sta. re regarding ; proposal but ha notd that future site at eiher the edsting or proposed densitii improvements ',.' to Naev , ,,StreertsS intersection wit Improvements 'would need. 'to '.be,,cOristetiCted',,at • , ; . ; • „ , The 'Tigard Water District its water s capacity to serve the development. However, the -Water istrict,, added that it may be necessary. to serve the upper portion of tho site from a pumped water 'line -frOm` Canteest:)ut":4 Lane and tO Serevi,c,,;the '1Owei.-, Portion, of the site from a maim ,,loCated', along SW Naletie',./,'Sti"..eet'' PecauSe of difficulties with water pressure. , half he property "73 1, down-Zorled tort..,R2-51.4 The NPO NO #6 has comme?„tedatitie":1,‘,,t1,;;r1- :the ' elistfel7,Pt‘„ half the propert existing h6oPm-ozgoennedeout:, developable 1') • neighl:)‘:)ririfj'" • Tigai..d School District 23J and Washington COutitir,', Fire .°1LO•trict reviewed the proposal and have offered no 'comments tit,' 'objections. ' N43 other :1:)nit,-•.,,er‘ts wee received. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria' in this case are Statewide Plartni.ns 1, 2, and ' 10 Tigard ColnpreheAsive Plan policies 2.1.1 6.1.1 7.1.2 7.8.1 8.1,1, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, and Chapter 12, Locational. Criteria; and tPio change or mistake quasi-judicial map amendment criteria of both, the Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code. The Planning staff coricludes that the proposal As consistent with the applicak)le Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the following findings: Goal #1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Involvement program inclt.(ding review of all development applications by the Neighbov.tric:Iod Planning Organization (NPC) In additic:an, all pui)lic notice requirements have been, satisfied for this application. Goal #2 is met because the City has applied all applicable Statewide Planning GOals, City COms:)r.nliertsive, Plan PC)licies , and }: Community i:levelopment Code requirements to the review of the proposal, , Goal #1(,) it satisfied 1because the l'a■rciposa1. tJill provide , for additional 11,:)Uti.o.tg opportunities as prorw,ited by the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Metropolitan Rule (Oriagc)n Administrative fttiles, Chapter 660, 4Divis'$.on 7). Approval of „ proposal would increase housing opportunities on the, caLty's, developable residential lands to 10.21 dwelling Per acre, , „ The Pe:GE 4 exghborh`Pod Pi,.� plan Pol�icy .; �,•,1' 1 ,his; sa�ta.:�f�e�1 �, b`wraGs;e, �L� �.. 4 ownor� w re iveno� nc �rga�nizat,ton. #6 and surr�oundin' ,npert,y g of the hearing and �' an oppor•tunity' Ito 'comment, the ro 06 an Policy , 6.1.1 is satisfied because tt's e " propo al ` would provide the . opportunity for additional. multi -fam ,l; development ;and would. increase the net. housing ;opportunity 'on 41)uild�able lands in the City This is detailed, in the discr. 3sion i. 43oa�l 19 above., T Cit of Tigard i,3 ,obligated ;through ithe'Metropolitan Mausing+ to p ov ode for -fin equal' housing oppc:rtunity mix of single, Tamil; t and multi-- famil��; units with. 'an over',',ll development 'density `:kaf .10 units pee acre. The City must ',ensure that 'sufficient . higher density areas ar o available . so the 'intent 'of the Housing Rule , can be met. The proposed redesignatiora would : further the city,'�.s '�omplxa1nce with these requirements. Reducing thie allowed ,densi'ty' u ou' ld bring tree ,� ity in the property, as the, NIX), has, reo.►sm,end.�;! g closer to non—compliance with the Housing Rule 'requirements, . Plan. Policy 7.1.2 is satisfied because adequate public service ties , e available to. serve potential .development on the capacities , . site at t. . proposed' increased density''' as ,indicaterlry bye the comments of " service providers,. Storm sewer and sanita, y we to' serve ,the property, phis `'can "'bea extensions will '. be necessa� °y , 4 accomplished as a condition of developing the site• pian Policy 7.8.1 is satisfied because ,the :Tigard, School D stri was informed of this ,prroposal. The School District is ,presentl conr�tructing an addition to the Durham Elementary School and. also reviewing propose d ; changes to school attendance boundari p Those actions are intended, to alleviate overcrawding in existir to ! serve cla�srooms and `� to 'provide � additic�r�a'l,. .cap acit. Y' future - , growth in the area. 1 J . ty ' o , plan �' ford ��a sa . :. . i � r.adimx is . � the � t Plan ' Policy S �- „Current '•4 . + e t4 u l nt need efficient street and oadway system that me' anticipated future development., This . policy ,'sat3 ' because add it;c. ,a1 anticipated traffic . eesulti ng fror increasee number of dwelling units that could,,be developed ad, acent str�ee Site world not 'Cause SW Naeve Street ' anc�'_ exceed normal traffic level rhea,. -f unc �` fir cT.assifications. SW IJaeve Strr�et and ' v 5uirimet" f ield is located to the 'south, are both functionally classifi minor collector streets, SW 109th Avenue' avid',' o'the str the, area are functiorall y classifi ed s ''focal strdeets . l ST STAFF REPORT CPA 89-02/ZC 89.02 (SANDER' • ;applicants ` 'have submitted a prat im naryz ttraf'fic anal ysx r M1 4 - r �l 19� AhA k� i; Ii t� L r prepared` Robert Keechl ,'and A socia "tee,, r °cons�iltr g tr;acfi engineers (E,xhibit analysi il' conc des h ;the °;ip d a a redesignation wouldl be expected'; to' resin s an , ac�diti r. „�' had;' " wau �.��;` �y vehicular trxps per. day from '`the site beyond ,, v expected_ under full: deve apmenit with `the g',exisati„ ng zon Ong, oft %�h�se-��t1^ip�' traffic' analysis projects treat 3 -.#�' percent , trips per day, would be' .anticipated 'co tr.;ave:l, south +,ands' eat; Ou through 'the' Summerf field' planned co n+ pity toa Durham ,loads i "'h analysis projects 42 addition 1 trips would 'trav summer field , Drive and t 0, eastbound ' trips on S mme,r•fie d a Drx`: on ;Summerfield Drive w ll =be Although � any additional, -�� , concern to ' "residents of the . Sumnnerrie* . communi ry, ''the''potential. ' ested traf fic, additional traffic should not . result � in "the rugg,, , rang �f SW Sui merfieid Drive being exceede'' The suggested traffic ;range of � . minor collector streets, as specified by the Transportation section of the Comprehensive. Plan,' i up t!� 1:.3, vehicle trigs per day:. The additiona'1'' traffic al *o' should not exceed the suggested traffic range ',for l' SW 19th , Av'enue' which" is. functionally `classified . by the Plan as ,a local. street. T he , P ,an I` states that the 'suggested traffic rang! ' of *improved local streets is up to 1,500 vehicle trips per day;` The traffic anaiafsis pro.jects that an addi1 onal;, 198 .vehicle. grips westward on Nalave Street would "be anticipated from full development at the proposed density a, coi;F,ared t • development at the current ' density opporti4nity aPpl icable to the Sanders' property, This additional traffic is not anticipated to result in exceeding the suggested traffic range of SW 'Naeve,, file et, a minor collector street, or' _Pacific Highway; which is functionally ` classified as an arterial,,, It is noted, however,. that any development of the Sanders property, either with the density limits of the current or proposed zoning, will' likely to �IIaeve Street in require off—site interim street improvements � both directions as well as . improvemenlws to the intern tection of Naeve Street and Pacific Highway`. Because the, proposed iredesignatiol would` not result in` normal traffic ranges of adjacent' streets' i kin exceeded :by 'traffic h its, thA C'0414, „ be generated by the additional dwe t1aJ g ion developed, and also because the parcfll is served `by an adequate: network Of "Minor, collector streets and an arterial, Plan {Policy' 8.1 .1 would be satisfied if the proposed redesignation als approved A Plan .Policy 8:1.3 will be satisfied as a condition of approval ,pff any future development of the property, Necessary right —of :aii, dedication and street ,improvements would t be treq U,irired at that time • The city is Engineering Division and the Oregon- Mate Highway Division ''will review any development proposal for the . site. stAr ` UE P� RT =- CPA 89- 0 ' z0 69 -02 (SANDERS) - PAGE `; n M• ca. cr t W • Plan Poi 8.2.2 is satisfied k on Pacific Highway less than " one ,3 0,4 � c�u ile' fr C xsu's Servic e 'ProperW The Locational Criteria, speciifiai in Chapter• the an fiediUm -High Density Re.' +dentxal use V are a i fied for Following reasons: The property is within a.. "Developi;n coininitted to low ,density .development. rea`° ;'which is no b. The property is approximately 400 fee rois.. the' rceares,t properties #+.esignated by the Plan or "sirvgle' family . residential use _ Lure ,development on, the' `;site would therefore be adeLluately separated 'from, low- density development thereby minimizing the 'potential for conflicts i,ct.s c �. The parcel, has direct access to Naeve stre et, .,a' mino^ collector street, as. well as indirect access.) to Pacific Highway, an arterial ' street, as des gn/Ated by" the Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Plan P1arii. The parcel is less. than 500 feet from Pacific Highway . ' Serious development . liti,tations affecting the site are not evident and public' facilities can be extended 'td serve the property e. Public transit is available oa") Pacific Highway within a quarter mile of the site. • Convenience retail service it available nearby along Pacific Highway, Commercial and business centers' are located approximately 0.5 to 1 , mile from the parcel.. Property north of the site has slo p es in excess or 25 percent that will be difficult to derielop and therefore will remain as private open space. Common open space and recreational facilities that 'cusomarily are provided with multi—family development will also likely be provided as the subject property is d'eveloped. No public open space is located within the vicinity of the Parcel, In order to approve a quasi -- judicial amendment to the Plan and Zoning Maps, the City must also find that there is evidence of a change in the neighborhood or community which affects the subject, partcel , Alternatively, the City must find that there' has been a mistake or inconsistency made in the original designation of the Parcel, Policy 1.1.1, Implementation Strategy 2; (Comprehensive Plan, Volume 2, y Community . Q.. evelopment Code Section 18.22,040( A )') a f cns with the applicant's s assertion that a mistake Was . de it ' ocus the Sanders property with two Plan and Zoning designat'iors splitting, the parcel on - yitudinally . The cu rrent split des ig nat { makes th e ;parcel very difficult to dev elop , because the allowable densities tl¢ the two ,. Zones cannot be averaged ov;Ir, the entire parcel, The staf.', be'lieves' that it would te, the units throughout the, rxit'. would be better to distr• ibu STAPr ` RSP( RT - CPA 89-02f2C 89-02 (SANDERS) PAGE I C AnnA STAFF REPORT ce 20: : Ti gar d,:P3:anni D tgartment DATE: ,,;� 14AARCH 3. 1989 Clu 16':1989`. CPA 88 -02 /LC 89 -d2 SAI BRf Requent7 for a ` Compreh ®neive Plan Mendment from 'Meth 'i Don®ity Resid�rnt'ial' to Mi ilium -High Density 'Rce®idential Rude a ,one 'change 12 unita /acre) to �Q -25 (Re6ideat :al approximately 4.27 acres. The: ' euaainde�r of the "pa�z al is designate; 146dium -High' " ;i onsity Residential and iim. zoned R -25' ,/CATION: `e stern half of 11165 • 8W tdaeve Street (WCTM 231 101D8, +eraat'�rm ,half tax lot 200' :. Aitntfoacrmh ®at1 ion atvhae i lSaibtl® e tlo$ ' v our d ®as adflfi,G' ' ana t Y s r' ep®otrat t e'na:nnd t rev %'. w information ariouePartfie me 'arid a enciea from Other oem r a reeommendation Will : be prepared and a decision Wi3.1 be rendered one the 'prop ital in the near futuo. If yc this ou: wi ®h tm omment. on a application, *�� need! "yr,aar coomente :by "��17�, 19Es You may uss the space provided below or attach a separate letter "to return your , comments. ,1f vat,;, are unable to.reerpnd by the _above dater, ploaaa phone the staff contact noted below with your CcimbentE and confirm your coMmea to in writing &a:4;664:110 passibia. If you have any questions re ►*rdi ng p Gent, , 5 this ,matter, ce�ntact ' +�h® Tig aril 'Flea 23297 13129 SW nin" Do art Po Hox Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.' PHO *1Et •639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: JERRY OFFER PLEAS! CHECK THE TOUCHING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewer th proposal: and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Imw./•■•01 Name of Person Connmentia Phone Number: ODE ` D .1' .J; FR''`M: Tigard Planning Department 'ST FM =MEN= LIPS.74'1 ° 'FARO 3 x:989 ' A 89 -02 /EC 89 -02 SANDERS liaquest for a Comprehensive Plan A endnIOnt from Medium Dead ty Residential to Medium -High Denspty Residential and a Zone mange from R -.12 (Residential; 12 unite /acre) t1': R -25 (Residential, 25 units /acre) for approximately 4.27 acres. The remainder of the parcel is designated Medium -High Density Residential and is zoned 1P.-02 . LOCATION: Eastern half of 11165 'SW Naeve Street (WC7,11 ,251 10DB, easte+aa half of tax lot 200). Attached ts the Sit,:; Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will, be rendered on the 'proposal in the near future. If you wish tco comment on thio application, we mad your comments by .MARCH 1, 1 989. You may ,Ise the apao'., provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you „ ar_ unab_h tQ, redflon, day. ahe�_ai ove dates, please phone ; w t_: sta 2f contact noted below with your comments and Confirm your comments in writing as seen as possible. If you hAlve any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO' Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 91223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: ,JERRY Op R PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT "PEI: We have reviewed the ,proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact ', of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: V � / D MKS (.47L._ IL�- AMS . �'' lie �ZD,fv- zaor ,. he ___ I' LAS 4.s rit/2 rde .7 / a re `'> exa 4604417b 1"'► Name of Person. Commentirgs ''�. iettie4P Phone Number: e �C.4v411: i; R 6198 9 AVall O 0 s3ar Plannin • nt or orshenikE Plant A endment 89- 02BZC 69-�oz � SANDERS west , :f �1` from Mediubr,,Density Residential to Medium .H Jh Der,6sity Rdvidential am a dential Zone . sz y t' from R -12 (Residential, 12 units /acre) to R=2'y (Keel 25: units/ acre) Zor approximately 4.27 acres. ' The rer, finder of the ii deem ataa' Medium -High tensity Residential, are, is zoned R -26 •' '� � � eastern Eastern half 'of 11165 SW 'Wawa Stine& (Walt 281 10D8, half . of tax lot 200) . At . t), had is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your 'rev ew. F information ;supplied by various departments ancIL agencies and from formation available t our staff, a report , d `recommendation, will bw pr pared and a decision will be rendered on` the proposal in. the near uturo. If You Wish to comment on this application, we yo r c atty -by . You s t 3: I9 \attar to I may use tho space provided below or attach . a ssparto . \ IOU., u a return comments. date. P l e8sa Phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm you cores:Into , in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions reiiarding this matter, contact the Tigard 'Planning Department, PA ,)Brix 23397, 11125 'SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONIW: 639 -4171. i o STAFF CONTACT: JERRY OFFER LEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY`: P We have revicd t he proposal and hale rio objections to . Please contact oft ou.`r office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments:_ Name of Persori Com[lentin Phone lumber: '"i••∎∎∎•+ 'I�w�,t�1a7�,��W11r � v,�,�►.iiiu e�'I YIOiYI,i,A ••L•Ie•,11,• .rt••••• it • ii; Jerry Offer F8014 Alfson DA1713: March 7, 1989 S9'"02 Sanders I ' The subject Site fronts onto, Naergi Street, an unimproved -minor collector street. Improvements to Naeve Street would be required as a condition of development and cot, provide the . necersety vehicular access to Pacific Highway at the acreased density. I 4 Sanitary sewer and 'stomp/drainage i.mProverserits would have to be °3ctalided to the e3cistl-ng systems at Relays Street and 109th Avenue. The existing sanitary sewer system is capable of Providing the necessary service at the 4,V,E„preaaad den°LtY° The exieting 11/1;°r drainage system would be required to be evaluated as a condition of development. The increased deneitY will innreaue the runoff gillightl'a° but the overall impact • should Rfliccumeridat ions 3 The engineering division has no nb3ect'ione to the lororilosa4 1611 11, d *.detsity/aPnincr change. Tigard planning:pepartiiient- s' CPA, 89402/Z0 '119•42 ;, .SANDEAS. • • Requeat . .for a �opZ.henBive . Pan Aim* from Medium D.nity ga..8ideOt.441 .tO iittsciPtiiira$411 and ZOne'-.Change...frpni R-12 (aeidetia1, 12 unite/acre) to R-2 (Reslidentiai, `25 intbe/ac,re)"•Itok' aPProxima,.41.3t 4.27 ,iieFeje...;.,•;*iie r.maind€ of tbe parcel. 'A0110-9111tegi_''''104juffi_ i:110-01t '11.!°25:- '14PAT;ON: ;415tIorn. half of 11165 SW Haei4 lODB, eaetern 'half of t:11% 'lot' 200). " • • '',';." • • Attached 'id :theSite Plan and :44)11cantce 'Statement, for your ,revirawl Frcn ini.nrmation 6,400;1.44 by,, vitrioui -departments ' agenCiois', 'and fro other infoatiort svrailable • • to our Staff, a report and ' rec.441mitindat-„ton will be. , prel3aied, and to. dez.leion will ,ba rendd 'on:the• proposal in ths tear futuris: If you wish to ,comment on this application, we ,need, your comiente by libmaLU: 19894 You may II II 19 the 'Space provided below or Attach, a 'separate letter to return' your :Comments • IS/IL At d skim IA .ktly..,,n1 al ad, ,y?lease . , hone the 'etaff cOnt,tidt- noted bow , with your comments and , Confiro your cotaments in vtiriting ai soon ae po$10,,ble. If you have any gnentione ,regarding • tttib- is-Catitar, contact 'the Tigard Planning Department, PO Bo 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639.74191. • • • LI •.,'STAPP • ,CONTACT: L.OFFER PLEA9 11 CHEM THE FOLIA.1WING IT1SNS THAT ltiPPLYI X We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. PliEflase refer to the enclosed letter. Written Cornments: Name of Person Comment Phone Number: 6844269 0' J s ATE s ! ,MAkc 1989 P14 �IJ FROM: T. lard Planning Repartment �a CPh,. 89 02 /ZC 89-02 BANDBRB Request for a Comprehensive 'Plan lune ndment from Medium Density Residential to Medium -High Density Residential and a Zfsne Change from R -12 `Re iidentIal, 12 units /acre) to R ..25 (Poeidential, 25 . unite /acre) for approximately 4. `7 a.re ®. The remainder ' .of 'the parcel is designated Medium -High Doneity Residential and is zoned R -25. LOCH �, r 5 S�1 Naeve Street (�tCTM�; 281 iCtiDIB, e)aetern TIC1Ns Eastern half of 1116 half of tax lot 200' Attached in the Site Plan and applicant/ ' e statement for your review. From information supplied by various department', and :agencies and from other information available to our staff, a r poet, and rccoMmendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on 'the proposal i. ► ,the near future. If you wieh to comment on this application, wi seed your c©aeentn by 11m.1.9, 1989. You may use the apace provided below or attach 'a separate letter to return your comments.' If . vc A are up bl_e t die_ v to please phone the staff ' contact notes below, with your comments', and confirm your ur comments in writing as noon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE:. 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: JERRY OFFER PLEASE CHECK TEE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: XX We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. XX Written. b. +s!imente:_ The water disrict has an 8 -inch main alb SW Naeve Street which is available to serve this development. It i_s noted that the , .._...ems, gradient is very tee P , causing' a she p reduction in water pressure new and this for/development higher on the ,hill . The tat er G, ortion_.. of , the _:develop - ment mt.y havo to be served from a :higher p y �... �:...�,,..�..,.,,;. ved �,. ,pr�ssure �:'eve1, a pu�► ec�. s stem located on Canterbury Lane. Engineering wise the development ` can be served. Name of Person Cotmnenting• -- ----- It may expensive y Abe Phone Number: Robert E . Santee 639 -1554 Dail=.' Tigard Planning Department, : CPA 89 -02 /IC 69-02° NAND Raques:t fox a Cam ohen. i iLL m.; Density Residential to I divaf -11 igIi Den ZOna Change . trod R-12 (kexiient;isil , 12 `units acre) 25 units/acne) for approxitately 4.27 acres. Tt e s "de.igi ated isedi -High r; Density RAabieie� tial acne LOCATION: Eastern half of 11169 8ii N' aas .Suet (H half of 'tax lot 200) . t- ' ltcant: • staff l►tfiaoh+ad � 3s : the Site P]an, nand ' , pp various d formation s>ut�Yjpl3.ed by nts in;Eorwation available trD our staff, a report Orsilared and a decision will ;bo'rend tad on 12 you wish to ac msnt on this application, i 19B2. you .ma:r So than space provided below "4 ; return your coom ent� .. i t1-.,. phone .the , staff contact noted :below Wig,'. comments in writing u soon as possible... " If yc this matter, contact ,the Ticidird Planning, DDa � Hall .Sled. i , T gaacd, OR 97223. PHONE: " X ST PF a NTACT: __ _,,... $ ...,.. PLEASE CfficR 7. ; FOLLC WING ITS, THAT 'i'nP1 ?LX: We have reviewed than proposal and have no objections to Please contact of ■:eur office. Please refer to the enclosed hatter. Written Comments:„., RS 'MARSHALS QFFIM Name of Person Commenting: �- Phone Lv, `ka,• PROP0S'AL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: CPA 89.4 ZC 89 -02 FILE TITLE: Sanders APPLICANT: Planning Resource ®, 'DWNER :William B. Seadera 3681 Sw Carman Drtve 23256 Bents Straet Lake Oswego Oregon 97035 Aurora, Ore9oa 9700' INQUEST: Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from medium Density Residential to Medium -high Density Reidential and a Zone Change from R-12 (Residential, 12 unite /acre) to R -25 (Residential, 25 units /acre) for approximately 4.27 acres. The remainder of the parcel is designated Medium -high Density Residential and is zoned R -25. Location: eastern half of 11165 -SW Naeve Street (281 /ODE, eastern half of tax lot 2010) NPO NO: 6 CHAIRPERSON: Sue Carver PRONE: 6398507 STAFF DECISION X_ PLANNING COMMISION DATE _4/_4/89 TIME _7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE / TIME • X CITE' COUNCIL DATE TBA / TIME X REQUEST FOR COMMENTS (Bee attached list) ATTACHMENTS: VICINITY MAP X NARRATIVE BITE PLAN RETURN BY 03/06/89 LANDSCAPING PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN STAFF CONTACT PERSON: Jerry Offer PRE8ARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL: ,ADVERTIBEMENT - TIMES 03/23/89 OREGONIAN TBA_.. / ... L NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE MAILED 03/23/89 LETTER oF �ACCEPTANCE APPLICATION /, / �:� NOTICE TO DLCDATTACHMENT3 narrative and DL CD form . ,Sam (=Otter • Pain 'Go tter Realtors, Inc. 12995 S.W. Pacific Highway, Tigard, ,DR. 97223 _ . ve Subject: Sanders Property Nae# Road Dear Sam: Regretfully we must rescind our offer to purchase the) .2. ovel referenced property. As I indicated it is very di.fficul'c tial attract an ::1.n.irestClu-- lender partner based on the split .zoning. Incorporating a plan reflecting the allowed density seems uneconoinical to the lenders. The other concern that precluded our • financing was the trfi.c issue relative to the Su;limlerfield Home Owners° Association and the need for a public hearing. It is beautiful propei,ty but we (.'iotti.d not overcome these hurdles in the space of time we have been pursuing the property. t\V`.' eSi 11,111 ■ Z 1E Mil 0 Ca coon LII F. Lk " V in 11 M. W .a■ ■ i ;MP a4 '4 rapiNal .rr,.. 1131SWIZZOit 31 in 1 iimmwwwiii 1 Emu ii tln4:t IT W[. -L. sM :ITM t[4k tali II+ L�J w it. y:.d unit he senit. to E) See uri di„ City of at. ate. Set for Final R ea *, ng,:on4 opt 0t, , -.Mpnth Day Year 'sae and Plebe. for Hearing ' 7:30 PM T].2ard.Civic.Center Town • 1.3125 e of Proposed .apply) CortIprellensive •\`'Landgsvi•-; ,'New Land lite,' • ,• Plan Atrtendittent Regulation Ainendment Regulation 'Please Complete (A) for Text 11knev,dr...ellts and (B) for Nap Ainiendeseiltt,s A. est fc,..5• ,tS,...„,seliens:ive Plan Atleridmer.m_i_zIlaji,ga,Med unt Dens citSeumaersinc,srr3riratnidaic)sllidtiaoputfir!p.onthg7ispsoeroef,:paoPtsrteopoadcils1Eddtii3OA.nc)t..4i,:oAn'voi(Wdrhiitgealybtriecehf'nical . ., . . , hi.gt1 reeideritiai and a zone Chan e /corn R-12 (ResickatjalUa.aangnzas. "ch,.."e) to R-25 (Residential '25 uIlitd/acre) 'for a i?er.,(taxiniatel 4.27acres. The remairec3er c:)f the rcel, is desi nated Meditlin-■1.1..9h densityesi.ilential'arid is zoned 11-1§.:..,, LOCATIO(C ,....,,tastern half of 11165 SW Naeve Street 2S1 101DB‘ eastern half of ,tax lot 200). , , •, , , ,.H ., 1 , For Map' AM. et:detente' ' Fill .Ont„,''..he Folloyilitig (,POr • ea,,,Ctr faire#:'.tO , ' ,,, , __ be changed, provide a separla.e, sheet- if 'eteCessary. bc), riiot'. uSe',': tax lot nimr.er , alone. ),:' , .: : , : , ,. , ' . , - . . ', , , ,' • ., , ,, , . , ,..,, : ,, ,, , . , Current Plan Mediuni Density Current Zone: R-12 Residential 12,untitstetcte) Proposed Plan Designation: Medium 'Hi h Residential Prot)c)sed Zone: .. R-25 " Locationi ...111§5....sitatzatr2ausastetallaiLsaacti2oo. Acreage Involve 4.27 acres Does this Chatigt„) InclUde ant; IxdeptiOn7 Yes For Residential Changes Please Speci the Changft DensitIr in Units 1Per Net Acre: Current Density. Pr�po5ed Dens • • • •-•1 • I ••., u . 4.1 ' , , • , • • let . any ,` State ` or Federal ervice District Which may proposal o Jere,:�Offera Assistant Pla er . N w'. C tyof TiciaEd P O Box :23397' �'ic�ardQ Ott 97223 ■�.e�� o nirrr/ (Pshona) Please Attach Three it 3 j Copies of tine Fropoaa] � a�' this Forma Mail To ,Department 'of ,'Land, Conservation and'Deve 1175 Court Street, �T .E M Oregon 97310 -0590. NOTE If more copies of this form are needed, please contact the DLCD office at 37:3-0050, o r this form may he duplicated on' areenr.paoer. Please ja i advised that ens reqt ire the "text" of a proposes; . . hat etatut provided general d,estription of the intended action is .not." sufficient. Proposed plan . and land use regulation -a.meriamenta,. tut' sent to DLCD at least 45 days prior to the final hearing •kid WW4i 1 II r, 4. Px*V" 47.4 • .1.‘, fP0'4, .1 A, , IL a' Atilto ;1.1■..151w, ■ta• ''.1W•Ntiv•Isarg-t4g.t.VirW. 44.66 , taV.W.-4MMTKIMMIVIVUO70141VW11M Y. • ....Iv " 2•71 j, 1 w latitnenerle" 1" )! ,, • "...174.(1.17.r NO) t t$ • 9,1,14R , >:P V vac CITY OF TIGARD, OEM'IUNITY ?VEL©PMENT';'DEPARTMEI PRE —APPL ATrON .CHECKLIST Date APPLICANT , /1 S PROPERTY LOCATION 11 Address 61 5� loke Tax "lap /Tux Lot Asp s'. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION /NECESSARY APPLICATION(S), cat Existing °+^q1 . +y ti , a Fol Q vse Adjacent Property north 1..tifle t„,t, ► i W south 0 ut , r'i'te: t M.., cA1 W\ t o pAY�+ A..IYI.�Ip.WN r (XS _l Q. �� West Vek-t. ct 1/1. t r" 5, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION ttit m, eKto ZONING DESIGNATION TIQN ' 3 7 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION NO ; CHAIRPERSON CODE REQUIREMENTS- -- Minimum, lot size width IA. m, CD . to Setbacks ht ,,, cornet i e,_. ;rye e yv peca ^ tabl i shed ire s lower intensity zones flag lot accessory .strcActUres ' ti cl'ulm bUi dire height 1 cI4arance a Other agency Pei"'mkr 10. PROCEDURE AdiiiinicstratiVe staff '?'Oview Publc Hearing/He4rifigs Officee, 17:44.F„ .. • 10190.rif. JUNIOR I. • SCHOOL: 'rEt:IPLETON, ELEMF.NTARN SC1100i., k‘%1 lir 1112C'jillir PSI • LEGIBILITY STRIP SEE .MAP tF Has€ sei (Pwasg Ut) - 2S � g.l408- _ SUPPLE1MENTAL. • MAP iyo. (PHASE 59 151.20 anuary 6, 1959` Nei roma Phil Past.ris, Chairman- NPO #6 8935 SW Pinebrook Street Tigard, OR 97224 ARE Dear Phil: ° suggested that S.W. 109th Avenue: be designated as a dead 5otmetzme ago the 'CFO gg , end.street to prevent the street from being connected between Canterbury Lane,. and Reeve Street. I have looked `our proposal. and thought that I -mould shame with you my ,dens on the subject. all I agree with you that the street should not be opened in its' First �,f . agree cep hill north current condition. The existing narrows gravel road with the steep of Reeve Street could not satisfactorily acco idate' additional traffic. Substantial improvements are going .to be needed ,to 109th Avenue regardless of whether it is developed as a through street or as a dead end street. Much of -a R -;�2 ., v � ti- Family Residential development'. the property along 109th is :gated. � �� - , A portion of the property 41c`ag .the east `' side of 109th is Zoned for; Low- Density Residential development and ie likely to eventually redevelop:, auto single; family residential subdivisions. When the subdivisions are developed,' toed 'conneetin `between. Y would expect that a ' 87 Stem, �,, - freers will ' be dei:�► p � , � of streets' t the gable Lene /Roodvie' Street neighborhood and 109th Avenue. � that, in the future, there win l be substantially All of this suggests to me �. , more traffic on 109th Avenue near Naeve Street than presently' eaciette Cl nubs ,,wil Clearly, tantial i apt y � +aver�ents to 109th and also to 1N8eve tree required in conjunction with future development. It appears tc �,e that when 109th Avenv;t s improved that it should be xisti�n�.. improved roaetw�.y i ,nneeting to Canterbu Lane. pP connected to l;ie e g � p Raving t ie. con - et ion . for the provide � The Cat.. new connection would provide ,be. g � �� c s.rcul development y tYF- s 4J i11 occur near Naeve Strec,.. w . and p ion ,� really � seeks � t nto each nee oborhood to improv ent wliLc r a. have alternative streets � improve ,cite =nat �e a' . t y Alte access provide a � gencv service, veti gut • � street i �w tL' p .setter access for ewer routes &i:;o assure that a neighborhood will not be ofi when a -� rhood re air��s. ' Because it is unli�sel closed due to an accident, a fire, or .roadway p Y that additional access routes would be permitted to .Highway 99W and beeause'} will want to discourage recess through the Low Density :, Res identi,�1 areas k, to , the south and east, itl appears to me that connecting 109th Avenue to,.the , north will be desirable. I would not expect that connecting 109th Avenue would attract'` thr4 u to this s',.reet. As you, have, pointed out, i,oeth Avenue ! doe , n+ t4 attracti.v4 connection except for, trips beg) &viuig of ending ins t n eighborhood. Highway 99W is a much more attrzictiae route for thro ig 13125 SW Nail BIvd, p.0 Box 23397, liga,rd, CY'egon 91223 .(503) 6 39-4 0 • lhil `Pasteris anuary 6, 1989 Page, ; I agree with you also that we, should attempt to direct' traffic to e"aior, arterials and not into residential areas. To accomplish 'this. goal, I' would s suggest that we concentrate on improving the existing minor collector routes' of Canterbury Lane and Nae *e Street as access routes to Highway 99W. The lans for improving Canterbury Lane access to . 99W'- by 'providing intersectiOn p p � y . improvements and signals, are scheduled for ' construction in ;1989, As development occurs in the 1.09th /Naeve Street area;, it will be important. to assure that additional improvements to Naeve Street are?sccomplished at then same time.. As improvements to .Naevc. Street and to 109th Avenue are designed, we will need to pay special attention to the grade problems on '109th and to any improvements ,.which may be needed at the 109th /peeve intersection. I ` would } encourage the NPO to remind us, of these special concerns whenever, yo'u reviewing proposed development in the 109th/Naeve area. In summary *, I agree that there is a need to address traffic concerns. the 109th /Naeve area as development occurs; I agrees that an, attempt should be made to direct traffic to major arterials and not into residential aresy�gs; agree that we need to pay special attention to the steep ;hill ;north of Naeve Street in desi Wing future improvements ` to 109th Avenue. I also agree that 109th Avenue should not be opened to the north until substantial street improvements are nutde on 109th and on Naeve Street. I cannot, 'however, support the designation of 109th as a permanent dead end street: I air sure that 1,6,'xis topic will be befo::e us again in the near ; future as proposals are presented for development of the existing, vacant land neat 109th and eaeve Street. If you would like to discuss traffic concerns in the neighborhood further, please feel free to call on me at any time. incerely Randall R. Wooley City Engineer br/8629D 3 or pecial': °height 'limits ' flag lot ®thy ensity calculation I` ensity trefi'lsition Landscaping: aftnimUm '7L of lot area Street Trees Puffer Areas Pars ing Areas Visual clearance J_ Parking and load; Access and 'circulation �...;. Sigd3 arewszwasswwwwsnmsimr OTHER CONSIDERATIONS (Sege application. checklist for ;!pacific "tea') Sensitive lands: ,floodpl **n ,draeinagewa11 . >25% itoj Wetlands Opan space Historic overlay St Peet iatprovea Q!itsiconnections /bikeways ,Right-of-Way dadicatioi, Sanitary Sewer improve wt •_ vimulale • Storm SeWer improvements donor Improvement Pgeee nt -b Permit Bonds; 'Fees` Other agency permits 10. `'PROCEDURE Administrative staff review . Public Hearing /wearings Officer J Public - . Hearing/Planning Commission The Administrative decision or Public Hearing shael1 occur pproximateiy 30 days after a coiiPlete application is ` filet! A, s all dQClsio►ns� M10-.# � a' ea. y pp period follo'�, 401 0/'0022P7 .� -�R✓A"i:,�. -. ._ _ �.� ._ .�Y.� . ..... .._s]` =.r� _.��-��,_ __yTt.- _ _ c±� . _ __ :1„_ _ "f;-sE,T^- _ .r^�o-.�,�.�y._ _,.� - - . �+.--. �io: - -� �,_ `:�-'':�zs�..c .y..�.�v��.. ,.:". "+�:y, : ii_.,'^",•.-��,,-�^,�"�;�"r. :.�.�� _.. ,y ..��.(L,s,:jn-r:-.�':V �Y.' _ �.,$�' "�e�''r``�=.r$:1i7�'"F ,�`�`�.�"."`°'Yt{,�y Z�ti.ew.-•�-'t's.. ' �isQ';a3«�'�'"`°' " ' _ S'r,'�'I�`�.'�..�,g.,3< '��'�,,1��c�?',F'�,;� ��2,5��';+- ��r_ 7 ��.�...,,-�1 _ �'�_.�...`�.,�a�-�.�.�,t�c+�.. � � - ._,.. . H - '"--��K''''�,.� �-r. ,�:,i�a.-._ 3c- ..� �..�',�,t-°�•'�d�..•��'-�ii�-•:��:.s;c:�t��v��S�Q��=�r��- .� : - - - - s , , - t�� - - � ` _ ' • �-� ' • - � -o� - - ' .-� - ` � - • . . - . - . . � � .s � , a � � ., . . - � � .- - , � - ' - . . ` �' _ . .. •- ' {{\` �t • �� . .- ' - • ' - . • ' -�`�- - e 'F . . . - . • . . _ ' . a I' t �_ ' . y - `�I . - _ _ _ - . , �� • l '� • � . - ' 4 � '_ _ � •-s = :j<. . , . - � . , . � - ; . • ` - . � '. i � y - - � � . . ' �_ � f s ` ` . �� . fl Q t ' ' . � - � - � t _ ' - . � - . Z c. _ , � . ;e a � J - e . "- ' , � . � = _ . . . -��J � + � 5 . . - . � z# � V' ' �' � � I ' , � � .-� '. ' .• " _,' '. . . ' ' ' .. `. . �� . . - �� - " . . . . + _' • . . . . ' • . � � - • . ' . - � ' � ' � � ' � . . ' E ' . • - . t _ _ .. . - . ••' � . { ... . �_ . � _ •. � � _ �; _ � - ._ � � • a - �" ' . , . + _ - � - -� : -�r� � . _ �° - - - � '- . �� -E _ � �� _ �, - �..�. , � � . - ,- - � 1 i S � � .1�• � _ � ' e��- a_ ,, •_ �� - ' r- � �: � � , -o �' o ' � 4 � � ' �n ' � . � .� . ' . . � ' � � . - - - � . � a - � - � _ � ' . -p� ' � . . - " • .o " � � a ° ` � ' . ' - • s ' i-e • � - . ' . , - '' _ • - _ - _ ' � • ` . . 3 � • _ 9 -- � - >� �� . g ' ' `� - • . � P -.. . • � � . . . . - � - t � . �� ' _ ' . . ' . ' . ('� - . . � ` " . � . . . . • O _ • � � _ . _ . . . " _ . . . � . , , - •,! , - _ �. _ A . " . � . _ - . . ' _ ." r. '. � - _ � � . ` " _ ' • - . -� • � ' 2 .� ' - � � "�' • + . • � " . . . ' - -'. ' . �' . . . �� - � � c' . • . - o . ° t _ ' 1 r - - • ' , � . - � ' _ - . . - � a � � • • � _ � `� c0, .a :- - - .. r. _ . g- : __� .� • � ; ' , ' '},• � •. , •, `�� _ - / - . . - �� - . ' . • - . - ` .- _ _ . t��` `6 - _a ' . �' . . - .} .. , ' + _ : _� . -�-'. . _ � . . t + = r • . . i� � � , . � � • . . ... �' - - � ' - - . . � - . - ' _� . � • . - , ' �� t . - . . � — r a . .. . . . � . ' " 3� •� > _ - � � ' ' . .• - . � . _ . ' - _ -r . - _ -c s . . � r % - ._ . . - _ -:�. - � .- � . � a ., � . -. . � . . � , . _ . , • . . � �� _- , ` • -' . � _ ' . e '•. _ _ _ � i _ _ r __ _ - �° _ __ _ `� .� � . _ _ - . �� ' •. - ., r f ? - " �` . t \' .p 9� �. �� + -� � . . } ' ' . . . - . ' ;r - - /. � - . � .. _ �. i�. + � - _. . / - ', ' . � ' ' ' ' _' ' �' . ..�..... ._ .__ �.�„.. � � ' � .- ' � • _ ��r `.z.r"�� ..z�' . , � �t � , �� -� f, . . .:�D ' d >' �,j-�!- �.. i�4 `_ ...,,,ti�� -.w_...� .r . _..�, � . , . �`� ,_ .' '"' .A . �' �-k s:t"+`�-•��- �rs-°�^�� . ' _'�,J. ��.a.....�- _ � � _ ' 1 ' . � � ' � '" �`� y " ��cc"'#�t-� � �-z� �A _ � i -� . :s ' � '' . ', t .�; - e:. i .3 "�s,,,�� '��•-�,� �. Z s' ' • ' - .: : �` - �.� =.� ��: . ,-- r � �. �. -_ ' . p ...� i�F' �. . . . . _ . .. . . 3 � i' . . - . _ . . , �, .�. ��- � t - csa _�}`` s _,..t -s ' : i �f � ..:':• � --^�_-.,` ... .:;e�. . .::. ,,,: c., 3 r_ ,x i� �'� �s .a°, � -- �_ ; �._�.. -.... .,, �.- - _...ti.= �:.. . ,�=_:c.�s ...-•,z �..,.. ;- ..._.. � •, :- :# <�. - .�,�.,�- ej�. ... .� �--.. _., ._�.. . .€�v >,-y. . ,. _�_. �� _......� ..:...n..a= , �.-�.m.;.. -+__ :��.� - �=..-s' �,*�T�°e.r .-="�.�.e'�C�....� - — �`- - - - �.:..,.�:a s..,< . �..�� :e_--"�--�,.s _.s : w�� -�" �.3- . -'�f<�.:-� �.�-�.s- �� `A..-.. ,__,..,. �-.er- '=a. ;�,,;"7«- - r,�� _�"�� -;zz' ��.-=�� .. :4 -� k..y.,-.r5'�x,,�';".;�`��r ...��x�-rz:r',ifi�_r2�*�,�F..�ky�:'�k�`�3 v�... .4� :.�r'.i� >,.?y�. ^',x.-,�`3. %_{��.�.aF.=°e"�.,,:^.�:��t-''��v�f�.-��i"'?�ar� - _�—.. � ` . . . , �...:�''trr��4:�-� -.-t.-_ .. .. . . .. -.r=� _rt-,_ . .. -��,a-_.-`'-x'�+ _. .:t�' � . " . - _. .. '"'a�' .. _ , . ♦ ._ � E. .K. ..�€� 'x�.�_ ; - -. _ - ' � _ , . _ c - � [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]