Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SUB1993-00009
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. 00 76th Ave ice, 3300, 00 3600, 3601 Duane Roberts FROM: Greg Ben,/ Aeg PROJECT: ` i a ifl ;' Yio a etland Mitigation Proposal SUBJECT: Review of Proposal DATE: may 5, 1999 As requested, I have reviewed the consultant's proposal to 4 nstruct and improve wetlands in the gre,enway near City ball, Looks like a good project. Recommendation 1. Proposal shodid describe aces to the sites and the type ®f equipment expected to be used This should not be left to the contractor. How would irraaataon be accomplished? Work should be subject to a street opening permit issued by the Development Review Division. The permit sh ®u Id require site clean up, debris removal, and repair of damaged prJperty. Damage to paths is of particular concern. The permit should remain in force until the USCOE and DSL have conditionally approved the initial improvements Wetland application should explicitly state that City is not a party to the permit and enforcement of the permit will be directly solely against the developer. C: BR, G Please let me know if you would like a copy of the proposal, P.ItA.Kbu 4.21) !a� W Motion ► councilor Schwartz, nded by 'Councilor Hawley, to approve /y�� Items �1 �a�gp ' app by Consent �r�YWA V'.. AiY �O Y and �A� Motion was approved b unanimous ville of un 0 present. (Mayor Schwab and Councilors F ier, Hawley, Hunt, and Schwartz voted Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Fowler, to amend Consent Agenda 4.2 which would adopt the City Council Calendar with the deletion of the May 170 1 oz. '' meeting. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Schwab and Councilors Fessler, Hawley, Hunt, and Schwartz voted "yes.' PUBUC HEARING - PACIFIC RIDGE SUS -- Sto5 --CftrX/ �. Public hearing was opened. tletlb City Adminisb'b• advised the City Attorney had requested this item be set aside until May 24 -Fallow the appellant to prepare for an appeal. Mr. Reilly advis ;., that staff concurs with the request. Motion by Councilor Fessler, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to continue the Public 11 ,: wring to May 24, 1 Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present (Mayor Schwab :� :. d Councilors Fessler, Hawley, Hunt„ s d Schwartz voted N'yes." 6. PUBLIC HEAnING - SOLID WASTE RECYCLING RATE INCREASE (CUR . I E COLLECTION OF YARD R! S, WASTE) a. Public hearing was opened. b. )ec9'iations or challenges. Councilor Schwartz advised he had p dpcited in several discussions with people on this issue. He also advis W *e that 4re were several letters in the Council packet from residents on this agenda item Mayor Schwab said he also had had discussions about this issued He clarified that this Was al ;islative public h. ing aid as su h, prior Council discussion and review of inform on would not prevent a p bt am for Council hearing on th. issue. • Management Analyst Edin intr IA * u t .�... the agenda item and sumni the elements of the staff report, including the process used for gathering public input to dato Consultant Rich 1" nghy reviewed seven° overhead slides, whit n included following iri rmabOn CITY COUNCIL, MEETING MINUTES a APRIL 12 1094 PAGE • necessary bonding. He advised they also do a check on the contractor to determine their ability to perf+.'rn the type of work required. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, with the Council Calendar corrected as noted. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present (Mayor Edwards, Councilors Fessler, Hawley, Hunt, and Schwartz voted "ye s") 4. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF FO MTION OF A REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT FOR PACIFIC RIM SUBDIVISIONt (This Agenda Item was withdrawn at the February 21, 1994 City Council meeting. Subsequently, the applicant, Mr. Craig Petrie, requested the Council review district formation) City Engineer Wooley the staff report, noting this iZsue� had been before heeCouncil twice before. He advised the st��i f c report is the same as presented on February 22, 1994. City Engineer' Wooley reviewed on overhead slides the connection charges, and what was done to reflect Council direction and concerns by the developer. He noted on February 22, 1994 there had been discussion about a surcharge which the City had been collecting on sewer hookups. At this time the City Attorney's office has advised the City should cease collectirg this surcharge until further review can be made regarding whether this charge should be collected. There were q uest!t 'anS • wer g � � by Council regarding the developer's costs. City Engineer Wooley reviewed how these cots were derived. • J. Craig Petrie expressed Concerns with past dealings with the City of Tigard as well as this one now before the City Council He said that when he bought this property, he also received the historical perspective en the property. He brought up several concerns dealings with the presentation of information by Mr. , , g declaration that l�a�ss �.x�clud�.n. the there was a dedication of the right -of-way on 74th Street. Petrie developer, he made �invesstment rie ad'vis�ed that as a deve�:o b the hopes of on capital. Hr. �n• c Petrie property pictures Showing sewage f. c the `s°o ert. with return lowing in ditches, A to illustrate his point that sewer connections Were needed. Mr. Petrie said the Code .language language Wass fair and that ��r. said 't �°le should be able to take advantage of the reimbursement district provisions as would any other person. a. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MARCH el 1994 - PAGE 5 Anthony Maksym, 13565 sW 72nd avenue, responded to Mr. Petrie's claims that he had not been factual with regard to the 20 foot right -of -way dedication on 74th street. Tze asserted this ems a proper claim by h:he that the street had been dedicated for public use by .him. He referred to 200 feet of land vacated by Council at the back of Cherry Street, which was under 'private ow nershlp and now has sewers installed. H noted he had placed some papers on the Council desk with the purpose of clarifying his points of testimony. Mr. Maksym advised he thought the agenda was in error He said there is no valid application before the Council at this tire. Mr. Maksym questioned the calculation of costs for construction of the sewer, and asked, whether there was adequa�s a proof of these costs. . He noted the City must go out to competitive bidding and that Mr. Petrie was not required to do this. He noted that if people are to participate in a reimbursement district, then they should also be afforded the right to have the costs be at the lowest possible price. He requested clarification information from the City Engineer, including the number of lots on the Petrie property. He also questioned the City Engineer on the cost verification of the construction Mr. Maksym urged Council to revise the ordinance with teafeguards normally available to citizens. He noted the zone of benefit was enly for Mr. Petrie. He noted that if the ordinance is accepted as prepared, then this would be in error. Petrie responded to Mr. Maksy s concerns, noting "Mr. Maksym T- afts something for nothing. " Mr. Petrie advised he thought ltr. Maksym was leaving out relevant farts, and advised he withdrew his application on February 22, 1994 because he want@ this issue to be he = rd before the entire Council. He advised he had provided corroborating evidence with regard to sewer costs. Councillor Hawley asked Me questions about documentation for engineering ca.nsts. She advised that if the. City Engineer had gone over the reports and accepted the figures then she would be accept this information as being satisfactory. Councilor Schwartz asked Legal Counsel to respond to the issue of ;'? ether or not this was starting over, 'or if the application should he ac :e P o Legal a1 Counsel Harris responded pp - he had not listened to the tapes, and if it is Council's recollection that . Petrie withdrew the application for decision by full Council,, then Council should proceed With decision on the issue CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH S , 1994 - PAGE 6 o There was a letter submitted :1,4 the Council packet Zrom ! r.. Craig Petrie, requesting that d�t Engineer place t he request for creation of a zone of benefit district on the Council, Agenda for March 8, 1994. Councilor Hawley concurred that Mr. Petrie advised he wished to have this issue be heard before a full Council. After discussion, Council consensus was to review the appl ication • a • y public City issue stre ht way, premature. Once formed, there will Administrator :Reilly noted the ubl�.c hear�n � nature this issue tonight � L� The it�� for Council .�.� an opportunity for public hearing. lh to consider tonight is Does this request meet the threshold test for a reimbursement district? If yep, then Ceuncil 1 4, i . not to approve the should review to C�..a'���i1�.A1e whether or formation of a reimbursement district. Any affected party can appeal this approval, and then a public hearing is held. At ' -hat time, Council can uphold, reverse, or modify the reimbursement. district formation. Counci lor V'essler asked questions about the computation of the per -unit allowance on the costs of a sewer hook-up. Councilor Schwartz advised that when the ordinance was r years was to approved four had lino allow the person who e d � install the lino to be reimbursed if other property owners wished to connect This way, the initial property owner or developer would have the opportunity to receive some reimbursement for the up-front costs. He noted that people would not be charged in advance for connections of ey are not tiding City Engineer Wooley reviewed the costs claimed for reimbursement and how approval oval of the amount was, obtained o Councilor Hunt noted he felt a different set of circumstances was before him if the $3,000 surchargr was no longer collectibles le noted the Code now allows for a reiiaburseent district. It This , opportunity. . is offered With no means of distinguishing, between a develo or or private landowner. She no ted staff had done good lob; o Council should determine Council whether this c"�p'�31„�u, i criteria, '� d�.st If sot �,e - • i ate n of the i urse teh riot and should approve f �. ' then the formal public pub1141 hearing process can be implemented .. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 8, 1994 PAGE 7 Mayor EdwardEo ag'r'eed with Councilor flawleyo said that the only way to resolve the concerns raised would ' `�' to for the (district and allow the ptiblic h4st i iZti proc sts to follow. He supported the resolution in order to ,`"get the process going. councilor Schwartz agreed that. the intent t f the reimbursement district had been watisi'ied and said the ■,.i.ster.cb should be formed. He noted . the cons ins of Mr. Mikan with regard to cost allocations had not been supported. During' Co cil discussion, it noted there were concerns at the public hearing process should commerce as soon as ps Ke. Legal R s adv sed �t property owners are azked to trigger the hearings. However, he advised that the City Caoil could require the hearing. Motion by Councilor sec+ nded by Councilor,40, Wartz that if resolution is approved, the public rearin kboess ally be triggered aid staff would start the process for formal notification. Motion wa (Mayor app o approved y a majority vote of Council present .i s , uncilors nosier Hawley w and Schwartz voted "yes n; Councilor t voted no . " Motion by Councilor Hawley, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to adopt Reso7ution No. 94-11: Iii SOLI sCJ►,D�`��?•�� I�'C. 94 � ��L � ON' ESTABLISHING SAM:MAtV SEWER REIMBUR8MMENT DISTRICT NO. 5. ppro��ed by a majority vote of CoUn Motion was s ail present r�sx ( l) (Mayor Edwards, Councilors Tessler, Hawley, and Schwartz voted "yes", CounCilor Hunt voted "no"). Council a in a recessed at 9:05 p. and ( ayor Edwards left the Council meeting reconvened at 9:16 pi,s 5. PUBLIC . i.c :N. t ( I -. XCi ZONE 93 »0004 'O a S 466, AGE AIIHMTION ZCA a. Public hearing was opened ened by Cocil President SChwartz Declarations or challenges: ges Councilor Fessler advis ed she had i is i ed the site CITY CCU1CIL /METING MINUTES MAIICH 1004 Nigardigammessm p1gIIComR13lCi Ya\ W;PW ∎R BUSINESS MEETING 2 SITOR'S AGENDA No visitors. 3 co ,„_,1w4!Gi D7 Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Hawley to approve the following Consent Agenda: 3.1 Approve Appointment to the Planning Commission ,v Michael Collson Resolve t3 on No 94°-07 3.2 Authorize $21506 Contribution from the Water Fund d to the League of Oregon Cities to Hire a Consultant to Develop a Joint Application for a Municipal, Water Reservation on the Willamette River 3.3 Authorize Extinguishment of Easements within the Landau Woods Subdivision ® Resolution No 94 -08 3.4 Authorize Cancellation of the City's Interest in a Water Right - Marion Estates Subdivision - Resolution No. 74-09 Motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present 3-0. (Mayor Pro Tem Fessler and Councilors Hawley and Hunt voted "yes.") 4 COUNCIL CONSIMMATION OF FO: ►1e .TICN OF A REI '1J..NT DISTRICT FOR PACIFIC IDGE SUBDIVIsIOfl' e Mayor Pro 'Tern noted the Council had the prerogative of addressing this issi a or turning it de wn , at this time Sher.. referred to questions raised with regard to methodology for a reimbursement district. City Administrator Reilly advised the first question to resolve is whether or not the Council wants to have a reimbursement district forted under this particular set of circumstances. If yes, then the Council may want to take more comment and discus the apportionment .of the costs. There has been interest expressed in reviewing the reimbursement district ordinance, including the philosophy behind it as wee as procedural matters Councilor Hunt advised he, at present, la leaning toward voting , , reimbursement district request. noted with individual rights be concernS w� refuse the regmbur being subjugated, especially in this instance., Developers � vidual citizens. to CouxncDi.loe preference many times over in Councilor Hunt Said he is not in favor of a developer building a subdil Lion and then requesting individuals to pay for the sewed. He said there are subdivisions being developed and the developers are not asking for reimbursemett district formation. CITY COUNCIL MEETING miNutfris FEBRUARY 22 1994 PAGE 4 } . i`�"a'�r__,}} Councilor Hunt said the reimbursement district provisions are not well defined in the Code. He added, however, that he is not against the concept entirely. Councilor Hawley said the reimbursement district concept was a good economic development policy. The reimbursement district ordinance allows a developer to spread his cost and move his product. She said, perhaps, the Code provisions do need reworking. Counc:Aor Hawley supported a review of this application at this time. Mayor Pro Tea Fess ler recalled an earlier reiinbursement district request which had benefitted a stealer landowner. She said the way she envisions a reimbursement district i, that it would be for smaller landowners, who have to hook u to the sewer because of a failed septic tai*. or beca.use the want to develop one part of their land. She questione( whether the same parameters should apply to smaller landowner and a development project (i.e., above three or four parcels). Councilor Hawley said that she did not think this was really "relief I" but rather, a financing process. Legal Counsel livionahan said the City would be pro a collection mechanism. Councilor Hawley said that whether the reiMbursement is collected. from the developer or individual people and disburse it back to the developer, it is simply a difference in the process -- the paperwork and the timing. Mayor Pro Tem Fessier advised she had methodology concerns, espetlially in this instance. She said would like reView of criteria and discussion of what the intent was of the reimbursement district provisions of the Code. City Administrator Reilly noted that this proposal must be reviewed on the basis of the current ordinance. ()nee a decision has been made on this isue, the ordinance may be reformatted. In response to a question from CoUnailor Hawley, Mr. Reilly advised. that Legal CoUnsel Coleman had advised this application was consistent with the ordinance. It is Council's disdretion whether to authoriZe this reimbursement district. Legal Counsel Monab Ian agreed the formation of th,%.2 reimbursement district was at the disCretion of City Council. City Administrator clarified that the first queStion to be determined by Coundil was whether this was a legitittat reimbursement district before deCidir* ho W the costs shoulLd be apportioned., CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 22, 194 - PAGE 5 Motion was ;offered by Councilor Hunt to disapprove Pori aticn of a reimbursement district as requested. Mayor Pro Tem Fessier called for a second. Councilor Hawley noted no discussion or testimony had been heard on this issue. After brief discn scion on process, Legal Council Monahan advised that since Council requested new information from staff at the last 4eeting that reaction to this information should be heard from the public Councilor Hunt withdre his motion. City Engineer `;rooiey reviewed the staff report. At the last meeting, council. ch,rgeu should �� determined be based on the number of amts and not the size of the lot A letter from Mr. Petrie was, received (filed in the Council packet) concerning how to determine commercial development with regard to the n ,n aer o : unit connections. Staff prepared � language which should reflect the Council's direction and still reacts to Mr. Petrie's concerns. The language provides that if a single faygily dwelling connects ,it would pay for one unit. Later, is the lot is subdivided and another house is connected, they would pay for the second unit. If a log: is zoned commercial and has a house on it requesting connection, then it would pay fo,' a single ,unit, however, if this house is torn down and the lot was developed for commercial use, then it would pay for the full number of units assigned to the lot. Over the term of the. reimbursement district, no lot would pay for more than two units. ('Tie: above changes were made by adding Note 4 to Exhibit 11 and also has been reflected in the Engineer's Report Councilor Hint asked how much of an audit is done to arrive at the total number of doil.rs eligible for reimbursement. City Engineer responded that, in all cases, the applicant is asked to show some evidence of what their costs actually were. 'Usually, a billing is Submitted from their contractor or a copy of their contract. In this case, Mr. Petrie s Company a letter from his contractor saying how much the Pe p y was charged for the sewer portion of the development. Also th 1 e were engineering costs and fees charged by the City staff reviews and atics for evidence that these expenses were actually paid. Also, staff reviews to determine whether the costs appear to be reasonable s that is, what would be expected for this type of development. In thie case, staff reviewed the costs and made some changes downward because it appeared Inhere were sonde items included (side sewer stab outs for the new subdivision) which should be removed. CITY COUNCIL ETI 14I ;T FS -i FEBRUARY 22 1994 PAGE 6 k, 4 »: Mayor Pro Tem Fess1er asked ' ahout Corset for a current sewer hookup for property not: in a reimbursement district, City gir eer advised there are sewer connection charges ,esteLlished by Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) which must be paid whether or not the p: operty is in . a reimbursement district. A od►nnection charge for a single family dwelling is. $2,200, plies a $35 inspection fee (total = $20235). O./errantly, in Tigard if the property hats .not participated) in build inl the eewer, , they are also subject to a surcharge of $ a ,000 per connection. Councilor Hunt asked for c1 arif ica eion: If part of the reimbursement district, then a property owner would not have to pay $3,000? City Engineer Wooley responded � d�d yes, but c ti oned there has s been soma question raise d about the urr eht ordinances (regarding the eurcharge). This question is in the attorney's office and is under review to determine if in compliance with USA agreements Mayor Pro Tem ressler asked if there was any difference in charges between single family and commercial. City Engineer . e y the charge is sti11 $2, 200 per ad'i�a.sc6� that for ngfl'a�l't]"�°fayrl�.�.. unit. Pees for commercial is based on the number, and type of elumbing f izturea uncilon Hunt acid the $3 , 000 surcharge , makes a difference, as far as he is concerned, about this r g �o exmbllnrrsemcamt district formation. In response to a gucstion fro* Councilor Hunt An,,;, Legal Counsel Monahan advised that 'part iciL eti ?',fig in the " , ce the ��, perty's the sewer construction and ream�aursei�►ea�t district n would be evidera in �e rurchge. participation would not be as es ed Mayor Pro Tem ressler e q d " a in the commercial and resid ential ce ect n chares. City Engineer advised that the USA connection charge ie by ed on the l�b1ng fiXtlres . � the r6imbUrsement district charge is a Separate calculation. Councilor Hunt asked for farther clarification on the surcharge. City Engineer drised tha t the surcharge of $3,000 is charged per connection. Councilor Hunt nOted that it f ouid be less expensive for property here to participate in the CITY COMICIL MEETING MINIMS VEBRUARY 22, 1994 PAGE 7 reimbursement district. City Engineer said that it would be less a Temive assuming that the surcharge "stays on the books . 16 In response to a request for cla.: if ication from Councilor Hawley, City Engineer advised that MA charges $2,200, which is independent of the reimbue semeet district charge. The 0,000 is a surcharge, collected by the City ( into the sewer fund) to those persons who did na t participate in extending the sewer. Discussion fol]„owecd, on the City sewer fund, equity ty issues of those who did and did not participate and the role of the reimbursement district. Mr. Craig Petrie said: (transcription of type follows for Mr. Petrie p s comments ) "Ism going to ask to withdraw this right now... because of philosophical differences. Councilor r Hunt, I heard you say that you had a problem with 'reirabursemuent. .the whole issue. Then, when it becaee money...you flopped the other way I don't think I'r getting a .fair shake here, a fair hearing. I think before we started ,!'e , at least tYo out of three voiced what your concerne were. I point out, Mayo, that the lady who developed her property -- developed her property. You know, developers you y ... (we've) ° the o money folks always t�i� Ghat s not the case. of full I am sitting somewhere. asking to withdraw this another meeting, hopeiully when there's a lot more Councilor here. I don't feel like I'm g eyQJ vg a fair sha 1G -- the q e deci.si onwere already made. ®.like I said, philosophical', Counci loH t -- the issue of reimbursement, whether it is fair or not.., .can develop something, and I have a real hard time with that. I am asking to withdraw this." Legal Counsel advised the Council as bound to accept the withdrawal Tony Maksgni, resident of Tigard, ard, said that if Council voted to deny this request that this would provide the opportunity to put protection in a new ordinance. Mr. Petrie, advised Mr. Maksy , would then have to apply under the new er inane . He said there is a need for safeguards in the ordinance and urged that work begin on this iZsur City Administrator Reilly advised that at staff ,e g ell ` � coffin back to the Council for review of this ordinance. The review would d fo V . ,. .... improvements to 4- 3. e proces s. ces s o :Also p e philosophical purposes of the ordinance eh ®U]a.se be worked through. The reimbursement district concept is useful tool for a variety of reasons. This will be set on a future Council work session agenda. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES °°° FEBRUARY 22/ 19 4 • L.) a. Public hearing was opened b. Declarations or Challenges None c. StalEf Report Associate Planner Ao . �r reviewed the Staff report which is on file in the Council ` packet. The. methodology is unchanged from the methodology which was used by the Tigard Water Districts There was brief d iscussion. City Ad .nis trator Reilly advised further analysis of the SDC wouJ b pneeded after the Capital: Improvement Program is updated d Public Testimony - None. f Close Public Hearing g. Council Consideration RESOLUTION NO 94 -10 - A RESOLUTt(N OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIME CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON'. S; o TING'I THE METHODOLOGY AND SETTING THE AMOUNT FOR SYshrim DEVELOPMENT CHARGES FOR WATER SERVICES. Notion by Councilor Hawley, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to • Copt Resolution No 94 -10. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Pro Tem Fes ter and Councilors Hawley and Hunt voted "yes.") 6. TaPOW_ o"°Y _ DISCUSSION Community Development Director Ed Murphy and Associate Planner John Acker reviewed this agenda. it e. a Staff referred to a current annexation asap as well as ' a memorandum dated February 7, 1994, from Ed Murphy, Community Deeelopmeft Director to Pat Reilly, city Administrator. (Memorandum is on file with the Council packet material.) Senate Bill 122 requires urban services agreements to be developed for the areas within urban groWth boundaries. These agreements can then he used to develop anexation plan Councilor Hunt suggested further review of the annexatiLon policy be deferred until Jawua,ry 1995 after Council electi c ns e completed. After brief discussion, there were no ob j ectiona raised to cio ' wing the anne a t ,on polic y i discussion. It was noted that growth was continuing in areas (such as N3u1l fountain) and to defer aCtion would mean that any prohiems identified ,would becalm e store crit�.oaY CITY COUNCII., MEETING MINUTES w ;FEBRUARY 22 1994 City staff advised that annexation is only one method to attain the goal of g tArth management. N ai. ) Bement could lbe achieved t u'4 ough amendment of the Urban Planning Area Agreement (U AA) with Washington County by dealing with urban services planning ing i., that document. City Administrator Reilly suggested that z goal statement with t regard to �' the UPAA be developed prior Ato approaching the �t County for ., nc ent p P Councilor Fessler requested a ropy of she UPAA for review. This items will be on the Marctt 8, 1994, Council a lrenda for f'.1.r. her ascussion City Administrator advised that two letters of interest were received , Hr Michael H °ewin and Talr. Jack Schwa y asked that they be considered for the Interim Mayor appointment. After discussion by Cctimc;il with the City Administrator about process, Council consensus was for all Council members to de, .:lop two questions to ask the interim candidates. The candidates would be asked to give a two to three minute statement at the beginning of the interview prole ;ess ��utlina�ng why they would like to serve as interim Mayor. The interviews will special i e con�uc�ed at a Council meeting, March L , 1994 at 7 0 3O p.m.; the meeting will be called to order at 7:00 p.m. 8.O mACA 1~.T City Ad' m. inistnator Reilly announced that the j o,_ :r School Board/Council meeting has been rescheduled to March 16, 1994 .at 6 p.m. City Adiirnis or Reilly advised that Westwood corporation hay, Asked for approva l to construct arr,, ?thee "pado° next to the Key Bank at the Tigard Tome Scs ,tare sate® There has been an issue oL nol a and Maf Bring. efforts between this commerCial Site the adjacent mobile homy park. Bf forts .. will tl�e�res i.�era�s cooperation from the developer t o mitigate concerne Councilor Hunt noted pedestrian actress probletas at this Site/ For example, the sidewalk in frond: Of Alb erteon's' cannot be used because there is inventory tor sale on tlne sidewalk, alk. Staff Will review the code to determine if daothing can be done. CITY COUNCIL MEETING KJ:MUTES FEBRUARY 22/ 1994 PAGE 10 ORDINANCE NO. 94--02 °* ORDINANCE NCE CONCE',,NING THE VACATION OFD 1) A PORTION OF SW 79TH A N d BEGINNING WITH THE IN 1?EESECTION OF SW 79TH ,AVENUE A,D W HIGHWAY AND CoNT INUINC TO THE SOUTHEAST TERMINUS OF SW 79TH AvENt17,71., 2) THE' tI ZDIV ISION PLAT TWIN OAKS IANE RECORDED fl PLAT BOOK 12 PAGE 18, WASHINGTON COT S AN UNNAMED OT WIDE G T OF WAY LOCATED M iEDATELYTo � EAST OF SW 79TH AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TI'GARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY.: OREGON. Motion by (iuncilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to approve Ordinance No. 94-02. The motion uas approved by a majority vote g 4- O »l (Mayor Edt arils , councilexs Hawley, Hunt and Schwartz voted yes; Councilor Fesslor abstained.) Councilor Fesslo,,• advised She was abstaining from voting as a e" protest vote" and referenced previous issues pertaining to the right of way. a, came/xi CON w w OF FORMATION OF A REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT FOR PACIFIC D (Note: Testimony sign-in sheath wer a available for twos pe wishing to this agenda item.) �'rsO�3`�,l 'id:�.�r' comment on '� a City Engineer Wooley sun►iaarized the staff report Which is on file with the Council packet material. b Public Co *spent Craig Petrie, 9600 S.W. Capitol Highway, Portland, Oregon asked fo r an opportunity o respond to public ' comments — Anthony Naksym, 13565 S • W . 72nd AVenle , Tigard, Oregon. Mr. Maksyi thanked the Co uncil for the opportunity to speak on this is . ue. Meek y outlined qes .. w y� the .. �d1���4 � iA 6ri.l: ;� �. . •. . 6'� 4 ill Among Mr. d several concerns wit':b. for nation of the re mburete]ent diatri.l g these concerns, he advised that he received �thee if icatio . letter several days after the date i, dip of ing on the letts r from N. Petrie adtvising of the sewer + reimbursement the Co est (A copy of the letter is on file with h until .. Packet iterial e) Thr( original date for Council consideratioIlt of this item waS set for December 14, 1993 Subsequently, the' reiniburSement district ±ormatlon request vas set over to tonight's Meeting. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 8, 1994 . - PAGE • LAII Mr. Ma kaym questioned the language of the reimbursement district formation and its as pplicattw Tt in this instance. There was question over the . methodology for the cost of the improvements and the '! lots per unit charge tor the different f ere'nt tai Mr. Maksym pretanted a petition with the signature of five residents which requested the 'Witar'd City Council reject the formation of the proposed pacific Ridge sewer reimbursement district. The petition cited that the undersigned property Qw���s har contributed o ver the years land, money and other good valuable consideration to the area where the sewer reimbursement district is proposed. Tie dollar value of those contributions were alleged to be far more than what the ` developer had invested in his !ewer line. (The petition is on file with the Council packet material.) Mr. MaktYlu discussed in more detail what he believed his individuai.-contribution has .been to the overall improvements to the surrounding area over the years. Mr. Maksym referred to outstanding nonremonstrances along 72nd Avenue and advised that the city should call in these nonremonstrances. He noted the need for a traffic light at Fir Street. M.H. Lefty Monsen, 13515 S.W. 72nd Avenue, Tigard, Oregon. Mr. Monsen advised that he was the owner of Tax Lot 300. He urged the Council to make a decision in a fair manner. He said it appeared to him that more research was needed before the reimbursement was formed. Elizabeth T,auckr 7472 S.W . Fir Street, Tigard; Oregon. MS. Luck adviaed that Mr. Maksyx 's argmnents were ghee said the previous contributions toward valid. taken . im prove mel is of the area should be. taken into account when Oontldering the reinburseme11t: distr'1Ct. She advised that ithee was not totally; opposed the re but had some concerns reimbursement dist2�� }"� the way it was now drafted. Ms Lauck said that her lot, Tax Lot 3%01, was assigned 2 tits She _ noted that this would be unfair because she wOuld be p�.`tp only made required to ,�a� -� for two units even if she c one sewer Conned c iLio n Ma . Lau been notified Lauck also a�,�.v.,�.seedl that the had riot be /4 by Mr. Petrie prior to the, PreviouN Council meeting- CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES °° FEBRUARY $ , 1994 ® PAGE 6 Mr,, Craig Petrie responded that he had had many conversations regarding the sewer issue with Ms Lauck. In addition d Mr. Petrie referred to testimony by Mr MaksyU with regard to issues brought before the q Mr. Petrie advised this issue Planning Commission. I�r9 was not heard by the Planning Commission but was hea d before the hearings officer. Mr. Petrie said that if the residents do not want to hook up to the sewer lane, then they would not be obligated pay for anything. He described a d to ..pay y "reasonableness test's which should be applied to this request and he asked that the reiubuesement district be approved. c. Councilor Schwartz asked for clarification of the number units Mr. Petrie would be building. Mr. Petrie advised that it was an 11-lot subdivision: One lot includes a another houses, pre-existing house and another sstructure . Eleven hou in total, would be within Mr. Petrie's proposed subdivision. Mr. Petrie » .� " Petrie responded Mr. that he Councilor �'essler asked 1�i... �.e hQw long Mr Petrie had owned the property. Mr. Pet p. purcha.se the property in the fall of 1993 with the �� ��, intention of developing the property, Mayor Edwards noted that the reimbursement district quest ieln before the Cov el i. should be separated from several other issues brought up during the public comment. Prior street improvements and other issues did have a bearing on Vhis proposal. In response to e question from Councilor Hurt, City clarified that ap�r ®}� imately ha.li= of the costnof the osewer liansta1lation co_ uld be e recove r et . by the developer � other connections w ere made. The proposed subdivision would h�ve 1 1 co ections ; there are ].1 add :ti:onal connections coming fro* the other adjacent • 6 lots. In response to Councilor runts question on why itonte properties::_ were GheWn to bie , ib e for hook ups i they chose to participate i City liable W o Y f e historical al philoSc ►hy behL d the calculation. Some lots , more than one serer are :Larger and could potentially have g � da�s1. connection. �, ert owr,te�r would ti.on the time one of the larger lots de .lo" rind a hook -up is made, property y » s) . f a.s . .. hook- all up u. s (1.e., ,two units). ter , :�, second up is mad,, no further charges would be due. In the CITY COUNCIL MEETIW MIKES FEBRUARY 8i 1994 PAGE 7 r ,c� past, it has been a requirement that all hook -up charges be paid for at. the time any of the hook -ups are requested Council discussion followed on the computation of the hook -ups and the charges made to the different lots. Councilor Schwartz advised that he had participated in a reimbursement district for water services. He noted that a reimbursement district should have a 10 -year limitation with •no► ex�,:.e�isione . a.� in favor of ®d � purpose advised he that reimbursement of districts served a go p p the concept of reimbursement districts. He noted that if a person does not want to utilize the sewer connection, they are not required to do so. Councilor Schwartz questioned the charge for two connections when only one connection may , be wanted. Councilor Hunt also agr eed with Councilor Schwartz' concerns about the unit cos''tis the concerns about_,,.. Cocslor Hawley noe�dunit agreed �:a with derived and the the way that the per charges units be paid for eved,,if only one requirement that a�.l, uan - ,- � • the . unit is wanted. She disagreed, however, that reimburse? 'aent term be limited -to 10 years since this may not be long enough. After Council discussion, it was deterrained that Staff 'would review the wit connection charge methodology and propose amendments (to address Council concerns for residential hook -up costs for larger lots) for Council consideration at their February 22, 1994 meeting. Legal ccunsel Coleman advised that with regard to question of the life of the reiMbursement district, a _ • by Council be extended request it fccann extension mush be acted upon before it Cou : cal Meeting recessed: 9:12 p.111. Council meeting reconvened: 9:24 p . m. G . COIJNCI:i CONSIDERATION Or PROPOSE STREET PROHIBIT THROUGH C ? " ON PORTIONS O ® 'R.A i:�T F G STREET , AND ASH AVENUE a The staff report was reviewed by City Engitaeer Wooley. b. Mr. Mitchell, .. Bill M 13380 S.W. Ash Avenue, homeowner and CIT member noted he favored the ordinance which would. add Ash Avenue as one of the track-restricted streets. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES l EBR J t ' S ; 1994 PAGE S STATE OF o4O0$ County of Washington City :Jf Tigard I df ,.0 being first day sworn/affirm , on oath de :60e and say0 (Plea nt p ) That T am a __ _.....,- 1:6--.L ---° -� The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OP PUELT HEARING FOR 1/That 1 served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planni.ag Commission Tigard Hearings Officer . .. Tigard City 00 ncii. A ropy Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Decision) of whi„',,h is attached (Marked 's nil at r oa the day of �e ddre'fds ��,.,, a tached, was poet r• on an appsropr .ate Exhibit "&") was mailed to each nsmied p attached list t arkcad exhibit °1B" on the said f aot! ce NO TIC/ OF 1:ECI$ION al here 0 bulletin board on the 1.72n. day rbf in the Vatted States Mail on th(1 postage picepaid o day of ay o ` . • Y roUBLIC OF 4' ....: d y Umiio isdion Expires: ■ CITY OF TIGARD Washington County 0 Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY HEARINGS OFFICER Concerning Case Number(B) :_:...SUS 93. 0 07 , 2. Name of Owners: G asco Investments and cayimc nd Phvll e Ems Name of Applicant :, Crai Petrie ....._..; 3. Address 13262 SW Br ant Road ('city Lake Oswego State OR , Zip 97Q 5,,,E . Address of Property: 4.r 76th - Avenue, the northwest corner of SW 2.4211r_iii.venueand Cher Ariye. a.nd two lots in between. Tax Hap and Lot No(a) .: 2S1 1DC tax lots 3300 3400 3600 and 3601 5. Reque ©t: The applicant regueete Subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide a 3.2 acre site into 11 lots ranging in size from 10,027 to 18,528 square feat. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.48, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18.105, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164; ComprehenNive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. Zone: R -3.5 (Rosidental, 3.5 units /acre)' The R -3.5 zone al,iowe single -- family detached residential unite, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, garming, manufactured h,ms, ccy y home occupations, temporary ee and a ee ory etructur a among ,thew uses. 6 Action Approval as requested Approval with condl tioes Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newapaper, posted at City Hall, and mailed to: X The applicant aid owner(s) Owners affeeted Neighborhood the required ��,istanc® X The hood Planning Organization X Affected governmental ageecietl 8. Final De en: HE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON w Ma, 6 2 r 1993 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS d aia eionnt � Tigard ment of conditions can 9 P findings fact, Hall, 13125 OW be ®.aIotai.rned from the Plannin decision, and statement offart City �� Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon- 97223. 9. . Any P Y and n may appeal this decision in adcordanice with 18.32.250 B and. . art. to the deca. ®io y p ac . ` . ( � Section X8.32.3"10 which provides that a written appeal may beefilediw within nn10 da days after notie a given and The appeal may j y force and p must. be accompanied ed by the appeal fee ($315.00) and trani cri t costa (varies up to a maximum of $500.00) The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.im. gy 28,G 1993 . y any gu 11 the city of Tigard Planning Department, 639 -4171. please c lU`. Questo�E3 4 p I f o�� have an estion ®; y � . 7 • B4 • • b . 1•. h BEFORE THE LAND USE KlEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding a request by Craig Petrie for GrLsco Investments NALORDER and Raymond Ems for approval of a preliminary plat for an ) 11 -lot land division in the R -3.5 zone at 13400 SW Cherry SUB 93 -0009 Street in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Cherry Park) h p. cz5 1. The hearings hereby p incorporates herein the findings' of th e s officer hereb adopts and r e Tigard Community Development ic artment Staff g Report dated May 3, 1093 the. "St aff R port "), including the summary, findings about the site and surntndr g s, applicable '. approval standards, NPO and agency comments, and evaluation of the request. 2. The hearings officer conducted a duly notice public hearing regarding the application on May 10, 1993. a. City Planner Ron Pomeroy summarized umrari d the Staf f Repo rt and corrected a reference to 74th Avenue in finding B.4 on page 1 1. without o b. Craig Petrie appeared on bi;. own behalf. He accepted the Stat` Deport without or corrections and responded to public testimony. c. Six members of the public testified with questions or concerns: Anthony Maksym, Ed Gordon, Charle�j Lanck, Dennis Worzniak, Yaws Walker and Harry Chick. All j or near the subject property. information live adjoining j p p �ty. Sever«l best source of such witnesses wanted rnf on a the public sanitary sewer access. The Unified Sewerage Agency is the uch information, Mr: Petrie agreed to notify the witnesses who expressed interest when he has `o completed plans for the sewer construction. Witnesses asked questions about the proposed structure heights and locations, significant trees, road improvements, and private covenants and restrictions. Mr. Gordon urged the applicant to place the sidewalk adjoining the private street on the east side of that street and to preserve existing oak trees on the west side of that street. He submitted two photographs of the trees. Mr. Petrie observed that it may not be possible to preserve the trees given the limited area available for the street colicumN, Based on the above findings, and the conclusions in section VI of the Staff Report, the applicant's heant`s me uest complies with the applicable standards of the City of Tigard PP � 9 P pP n Y g CornrrAu it De elo nt Code and should be approved, subject to the conditions of approval Report. 'A pprequests, . approved, stim SUB 93 -0009 (Cherry Park) is hereby approved ject i The applicant's s b to the conditions in Section Vl of the Staff Report. is1lthd ay 93. Larry Eps Fin, ICP City of Tig gs Officer AGENDA 1TEK BEFORE THE LAND USE aEA 1NGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TI ARD, OREGON w, R� e an a lication by Craig Petri: 6n behalf STAFF REPORT of g Grascc Invest onto and Raymond and Ems for subdivision SUB 93 -0009 preliminary plat pp �r lat a r¢val. 1. S`ARY OF THE REQUEST CASE: Subdivision SUB 93 -0009 SUNhARY: The applicant r°egueete Subdivision preliminary plat approg vafrto divide a 3.2 acne site into 11 single - family iota ra, agi 10,027 to 18,528 Square feet in aize. Six of these ]. ®t® are P po _, by �o s,�s�d to be acwal3�ed b a private street. APPLICANT: Craig Petrie 18262 SW Bryant Road Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNERS: Grasco investments 10300 SW Century Oak Drive Tigard, OR 97223 R ymond and Phyllis lE da 13400 SW Fir Street Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATI ON: IcN. Low-Density, ReSidential ZONING DESIGNATION: R -3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units per acre) 13400 SW 76th Avenue, The northwest corner of the intersection of LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue and SW Cherry Drive, and two additional lots in between. (WCTM 281 3DC, tax lots 3390 3400, 3600 and 3601) APPLICABLE LAW: Cc,Gmnunity Development Code Chapter: 18 48, 18.88; 18.992, 8.102 2.1, 18,108, 18,1500 18.160 and 18.164; and mPi ehenaivs Plan Policies 2.1.1, , 1 • ` 7,,1.2, 7.3.1, 7, ,4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. F O STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to conditions. Ii. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS • Sack r ,aund Information . rou h Separate partition and processes. The ®s�ii�tina lots were created i�hr ..g .P , The Roilin Bilio loci. 2 Subdiviseion, adiacent to the west uth of e the sai.te, was i n Octobei 1962. There have been no other Planning Division :review e . single family �,rsa for this 'site The e�kisati:ncg s�ir� re idenoe was built many y not require a planning earn► ago and did review. HEARINGS OFFICER - GRASOO \PE TRI E SOB 93-0009 PAGE. 1 ■ Pr J 1*. ti • Vicinity Information and Surroundiei ,f ,afd Dime: -This 3.5 acre sits is located on the west aide of SW 74th Avenue and north, of SW Cherry k'+rive. The northern pertion Of this site is adjacent to the intersection of SW Fir Street, and SW 76th Avenue. The 'pt:pperties on all aide of this site are developed with single family hi9ines. Lots to the east of this site, across SW 24th Avenue, are zoned 0-P (commercial Professional). The balance of the surroundia'!g lots are zoned P.-3.5 (Residentit : ?,,, 3.5 units per acre). Site Description, An existing family residence i� located at the northern ens: of g single f� X the 'site' Access t gained e. The . o this residence is ainec� from SW 76th Avenue. Bite enerall slopes toward the south 7 ay edf the slope Street right-Of-way. Tees the majority' . m throughout near the SW Cherry 9 the' site and are primarily clustered in the northern and the southeast corners of the property. The majority of these trees are Cottonwood, Aspen and fruit trees. ICI. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS" I r dommunit x De el ®me!`l L COd o ,. . 1 Chapter 18.484050 contains standards for the R-3.5 zoned g y hed residentia 1. unit is a permitted use in this single-ralni .��atao zone and must comply with the following dimenSSional reqUireMentos Minimum lot sine Front setback Garage setback Interior sideyard setback corner sideyard setback Rear setback Maximums building height 10,000 square feet 20 feet 20 feet 5 feet 20 feet 15 feet 30 feet A lot meets the basic solar access new • Chapter 18.88. Ci1a+ .. development. 40 C 1' contain® solar atcce®ei etarA area for ,lot res5.dential . ... n 30 degrees o .. a�1cl'' Standard if it has a north -South dimension of 90 feet or more has a front lot line that ie oriented within g. of a true east west axis A eubdit'ision complies with the eba is requirement if 80% or More of the newly created lots ale standord. p . 0 contains c�tandards for density. toe number of g p nt area, • Chapter 18.9? 02 exclLdin e+�neitxve fitted i.el based on the net development dwelling unite perm .:. � public is rl~oad® g p land areas and land dedicated for ubl or parks, be for private' roadways. This land area is then divided b y the minimum parcel Site p by tenting diet-rift to determine the number of lots which be a site. determine created on • Chapter 18.102.030 . � Specified vision cleaealtktie tr.axlgiee 'adjai ^ent tia inte h sectiane which t he height of p siLgns , etc. Are 1 united o three feet in height to ass ere safe and adOlhate night HEARINGS OFFICER Gi AScO\PLTRIE SOS 93 -0009 M l • r PAGE 2 xa t. distance at inter sect ofie .to reduce " ;potential, fhazerde from vehicular turning moveuna tea Altewnatively; t;»; ea may be li os d no to eight feet in height. Chapter apitatax;ris & end rde for sirsriglt � e ial;r °44esioential Vehicular' acceue. Private ■'.ari vee ma p rovide accea , for maxi muln of six residences. " A cortAtirt private acceseway F which serves 'between ,t Kee to pi residences `'m Est be a minimum of 30c feet wide with a minus sm pavement width of at, least 24 fOet4 ' curbb' and " e walkway. Chapter 1P4!. regquires a ' perse t for , removal of trees' having ''a trunk' :; 6 inches or more in diantet! r measured four feet above the grout; d on undeveloped ritaidential land. A permit for tree removal /musty Comply' with the Lollaw .ng ,criteria an' specified in thapter a. The trees are diseased, present a danger to proPertym or int -rfere with utility aerViCe Or traffic safety; b. The tress have to be rsas iVcd to construct , preepOaed irnprovementl or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property La a reaieonable canner o The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage Problems; d, The trees ar = not needed to protect nearby trees ain windbreaks Oran a desirable balance between shade and teen apace3 e The aesthetic character in the area will not lbe visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and f. Weir ' Veletation planted by the applicant, if moy, Will replace the aesthetic value of trees tO be cut. Chapter .113 contains standards for the subdividing of paro l a into 4 : or More lotto TO be approve prelitnitoryr plat Inyaat.ti comply with the followinj criteria. a. The proposal ramsst comply with the City: d Compa'teihendi' e Plano the applicable toning Ordinance and other �r pl, icabie ordinances and re ulations; b: The proposed Plat nastie must not be , duplicative and must otherwise satiafy the provisions of ORS Chapter 0211 C �i The streets and roadie 'Witt , sdt .. laid out SO as to conform tO . p Ma pd of ,part tions or isions airead ` a p raved for aM eubdiv °� di.�► ons� and ma miini>ng ;,�arope�s:ty As, to the l�tttt� oil tub y width, general direction and in all other OSpects wileSa the city deteedifiss it id in the Oehlid int6rebt to mod u y+ the street cr road pattern; and HEARINGS OFFICE , Ga A3CO \PPTRIE " gu;u 93.0009 • d. An explanation, `' has been provide c»' all common improvements Chapter .164 d 060 aw U 1) states that the depth of all lots shall not exceed 2 -1/2 times the average lot width. 10. Chapter 18.1164 alel contains The applicable standards are ad Oo standards for streets streets arnd utilities. follow: a. Section 18.164.030 fl requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the) claeei.iicati4 n of the street. 3 e See'tiot% ::6,,154. requires local streets to he constructed ' with 34 feet of pavement within a 50 foot right-of-way. « Section 18.164.060 prohibits lot depth frOM being more than 2i times the lot tadth, and required that iota have at least 25 feet of frontage on either public or private atre• =te, other than a n alley. • aaction 18..64.:0'��. requires sidewalks adjoining all residential Streets. ▪ Section 18.164.090 regal .reo sanitary sewer dervice. • Section ' 18.164.100 requires adequate provkL imna for ate rr water runoff and 'dedication of easementta for storm drainage facilitLea Applicable coprehensive :Plan Policies. 1. Policy 241.1 provides the City will assure that Citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and dovelapmerit review prcceeea 2. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard urban planning area shall comply with applicable federal, State and regional water quality ®tandardia. 3. Policy ?.1 2 vroviden the city will require ae a , condition o development approval that public water, sewer, and storm .drainage will be provided and designed to t~; ty Standards alit utilities placed underground. • ��o3 icy 73.1 provides the City will coordinate water services ces with water districts. • Policy 7.4.4 requires all new develop ant +ro be connected tb an approved sanitary sewer System. IiiCA,RT1viGS l7I"Pli;f:F,R ORi►..iL"O PI; iE S PAGE 4 a Policy 7.601 requires that the development be served by a water system having adequate water pressure for fire Protection on purposes and that the Fire District review all such applications. Policy 8.1.1 provides the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway ,eystem that meets current neede arid anticipated, future growth and development. Policy 8.1.3 provides the City will ,re qu.., se as a precondition of approval thet E Development abut a dedicated street or have other adequate accet e; Street righteof -way shall be dedicated were the etreee, substandard in width; The developer ue ion of the rtr�eet �, r shall comed►�.t to covet curbs, sidewalks to Cit y standards within < the developMent. The developer shall participate P rti.ci ate in the im roveMent of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; e. Street improvements ehal;l be made and street signs or signals shall be p,ovided'' when the development is found to create or intensify a traffieessard. x v . NPO & AGENCY COMMENTe The City of Tigard Building Division has eeviewed this application and has noted that any retaining wall over 4 feet in height, measured from . ke bottom of the footings to the top of the wall., requires a permit from the Building Division. No proVis 0.ons have been made for storm drainage from lots 1 and 2, and possible 4, 7 and 9. If the existing house on lot 1 is on a septic system and is to remain' on such, the tank and drainfield must be within the lot perimeters. Tigard - Tualatin gehoO1 District 23J had reviewed this application and bas noted that the proposed c evelopMent is projected to generate 4 new ,student® for Phil Lewis Elementary School,, 2 new etudente at Fowier- .. ... g. g., hool is already notes that the school capacity at. the High Sc� Middle School, and 1 new etudent at Tigard High School ... The y g g both School exceeded, although bc.,t �i �.1 Lewis �; ®wi E�len►�nts�ry and Fowler Middle are presently below capacity, The District notes that the dorm faeility Of the High School is ineuff icient to `.e able to consider 'i portable additionna. Additional: fichool, capacity me t P rovided by other option® ender c ®nsideratiot by the school Dietrrct includin : gcbdel level reconfiguration :ee hedAled echoc/ yearn boundary adjue'trente, double ehiftin. g , busing to r.,,;n,,aer- utilized facl.itieA, future bond .. measureet leading to icon ®triuc" .ion of new facilities and other school hoeeing options HEARINGS OFF4cER GRASC Tr„T_. -0000 .. E . • M PAGE ®lPt:r�c.�� SUB 93.. . r r:. ! eighborheod Planning ,Organization (IWO) #5 has reviewed this proposal and has ' stated that, they are ,'concerned about the gtality' of ;the 'storm, water nnf f ` 'from this project and host this will affect ee 04:+c systems on adjacent properties. General Tele zone has reviewed this application and has commen *il that the developer should contact GTE 30 days prior to the Open. ng of the utility trench. Tualatin Valley Water Dinttict ha® reviewed this appllLation'i and commented that the Ito adwa u e � y d$ icated for water district agree.. Sewer and ' w atr t in es should ',have .at'. least 10 feet of ©eparatio0,. City , g on, portla�`yd General z lectric, and The pit of Tigard kublic Wor�ss Dorf. ®� the Tualatin galley Fire District have reriieweel this proposal and have offered no comments or objections. EVA}rrUATI0aV)' OP REQUEST .din a„ia -- Subdivision. 'Z. T he p ro 0e1 subdivision com p lies with the use standards of t he R-3-5 zoning district (Section 1.8.4 8 ) because the lots ate intended to be developed as singie-faMilY residences. dingle family r / listed a permitted use 1,.:41 this zone. Ab e 11 proposed lots, which ran a in size between 3,0,027 and 10952 square feet, are all either equal to or liazcg,6r than tho _. _.� minimum requirement for lot ' size in this zone (10,000 square feet fax single femily use). As shown on the preliminary plat dated 3 -.2 -93 the existing residence encroached into the required Setbacks on lot number one. In a letter from Mr. Petrie, which was received by the Planning Divit$ion on April 26, 1993, it is requested that the lot line between lot's . and 2 be adjusted to the west to provide adequate setbacks for the residence on int one This adjust met would cause lot one to increase to 19,603 square feet in size. All proposed lots shall be subject to the setback standards Of the R 3.5 zone. Compliance With these standards will be reviewed as part of the building permit. application process for residential structures. Lots 6 and 9 propose to include narrow piece of land in their lots areas which earn along each Side of the proposed private street. 'These two areas measure 3.5 X 160 for lot - 6 (560 quare . feet) and 7 X 122 for lot 9 (854 square feel) The city is recommending the following changes to the design of the private street which will make it leeMe of a Maintenance burden to all those concerned: 7 foot strip along the east side of the private street ( shown he part of tot 9) ehould be incorpora6e8 kith the . . private 'street .. xEARarrGS ® _ GRASCO\PnTEI]E Sue 93 -0009 �°FZC�R PACE 6 �. The 3.50 ttbt.. strip along the west side of tie pr3 NOat e street (ahcwn as part of Lot f) should be i corporated with the, private Street • and G� The atriLL of i.and ona Lot .3 Whidh is botweennL t ,e k ammerheaci and the adjacent property ttc the east (tax :(:ot;" 3501) eh0u3.d b incorporated with t:'te private Street, A1teznati vely the private street hou ' 4 be shifted' to the east so ae to cane a the main body of e this ®trip t:o )ae �Cncoa�pc,ratn�d i�t lot three's Thi d;;t at ent ca,litse ,1. ; 6 and 9 to bra lees than the 10000 area foot lot rliniai.tm lot else which is re.quirod Of parcels in the iA .3.5 zone'. . Therefore, the applicant shell provide a revised piat which de strate a that all lots Shall cos tin a meet: this code standard During the adjustment Of these lot lines, the Aipplica4nnt should Monitor he lot depth to width rat io of hat number seven. r joint' e , a Maintenance , avne eof nt be It is �ecnde�4 p that a ofnt u�M and provided for the B private tre�t irncludin the porti lag epecif it3d 2 . Three tote (lore nniCaabe:Va '► 1, 2 and 5) meet the basil solar �►r ®® of the ai cesa requirement® as pecified in Code SeoIion The front .cat ' <i.ne orientation of these iota within 30 degrees f true east.west (flag lots, May. may choose which La the lot Tina These log i also provides a minimum ' nOrt h -south dime :PALon ) of at least 90 feet. The balance of these iota eithter do not aneet the front lot line t►risnha tion and\or the a0 foot north- sout''t lot dimension requiyeeento Of the 11. proposed d 1040, two lot! (epe.cif ically, *2 iota) vi be counted as the Standard 20% exempti.on from aheae solar reqUiretelite. Therefore, lots :1 and 4 axe exempted from these tftandards. The six remaining lots (lets 6 through 11) are p by � exceptions e tc these Standards. as per ,9eeM.On Secs tvd b.. staff as exc�a �. orth aot;th orientatd,on of SW 74th ,Avenue .� The n -'+ cauaea lots 8, 10 and 31 to orient their: front lot Lines in a north -south alighment ;nd therefore de not conform to the basti4 requirements of thief code Section. The remaaining l ate ;,' ota 6 and 7) are benStraines.d r _ g . . ...�qU e,n f 3: o both . cement aa; the r ro m sed private ®tree and ththei - on L guration th® pl.ac, p of the site. T- require Striae compliari s :•with th,Aso st f ndard6 reduce tho overall density o , is site from commended h th that �th 4 remar`,.;.ng two lots be exempted fr` solar areesa r .�. _ .. justmeot to the re irementa according t© the above referenced ad 1 . the m. t e the aolar access deal, n a�t;�n.aanraaa Thi�refcstJ, he re,� ir®cmeyl s Of portion of the �.� velop went Code have been Met: by this propos A. The p... po S p. with the defsity standards of . enait . The �i. Chapter 1!� �.OZQ (p lion y)c�;m l.l.e net develo able area f the Site ri � �ht,,ofL -r�a is approximately �a�fter deductscan of ti�he pine.^ g Y) 1 q ree) the gross Bate SB apps ®xLi tel o 2'x.-994 a aria feet 2.94 Sac . . .. � q ...: � , . -per ]loot, 31.2 acrir;4: With a miniMum leaf Otte' of ld 000 s�. uare fdtet p athatIt GS OFFICER is irtc0\pitttitig Stitt 93 -0009 .PROD I . AP tr pie site yields an oppartilO .tg� i xF` dweI1i �ri 1:a '. w i'de �J' � • 6w I.3.5 zoning d ignatioii (ap ►ci oat. r a2. ;1ote.) E. 3'�ne ; ,z ; �"�s e haft Proposed the creation 'o :. U ' 1v'ta, anal `thereby '"`cats alien this •c3tandardn Chapter 18 (Visual Ciearande)„ J "ai. �g itr i that adequate vision be Provided at all i,oad iratereec'Ei64p., Thit standatd ,k4Alx be ®ta•tiafied by ;adherence to then req, i.tOt ntl :2✓e0'xdiLgi t o height and placement of aaY °' utu 'e poa si'd1, obntruotione including a eubdivinLon identitnation sign. T ioir to thei .inata14ati 64 of any' such aian, a e&gn perutit from the Planning . Depa t>aaenat, uat b►e 6btaine. The akgn per it skew and approval pros se will requLre a finding that the 4 a.gn . wi:11 be con aietont Lth the requir�enta of Chap ►102 (,V�,a.ion C .earOnce) and. 18.114 " is t�3"P� �.� (Signs-Y.' Soctie.n 18.104 (Aceeea) any' section 11. a.64.Oi 0.t ' (tot 'rI,antage) are satisfied. All loi »e are timbvided with at least 2v feet of e�i ti*.e2 public or private roadway frontage as required byy Section 18.164. The applicant propoeee ,to conti ne to provide atceen to let' 1 and 2 from the intersection, of SW Fit: 8t oet and SW 76th Avenue. Lote 8,10 and 11 are propoeicd to be nerved by SW 74th Avcnuee Street he,adira ,. rio lots ark p�rap©ee�d to be 1�riv+e.ed � a b y p c3 rthward film 81 Cheery Thin proposal ct' p _ p ed by Section . � lies With the ao'oen� rovieio.�® reer it 18r108. herefore, heato code et Zara n hate been eattigfied,� �, t • &a otion13.64 � (tot) ctatee . that the ma2timu n lot depth to Width rati6 i® 2-3.J2 to G)nab L bt :7 rteete thin : tandarrl idith an aver-ag? ratio of 2.48 to 1.. A11 'heir hate are aino oil in c p lance with thin code nectic_►n.. Therefore, ��ta.t Of ithe proponed LAO are ih confori ante with thiea standard • Section 18 r15®®2Q j (Tree ? temova1) required that the *p1idant apply for, and receive aappeoval for, a, tree rentoitd1 pez sit ptiot to the removal .y teee ; g e� greater n diamnet r at a hoi ht of for feet above abrade pr3 t to the reiA ov g 1 of ant such tte0 fribmn the site. detailed tree aUtVeY has been etuhmni ted aft pa rt of t hie applidat .o,r1i prior to the iti uaaeioe of a tree removal pert t, the applicant a!`,'ier12 k.ipeatfj the eteea be ng requested for removal ass they relate +erg 1) publid itiproVettent,e, and 2) building en ielopeai The ptopoaed subdivision is conviiut en's with the eubdi isi.o ti approval standards of Chaptet 18 1r o QS0,i l (StubdiViStona because: • The proposed chid vision compx.ieLi with the 04a0prehensiVe " Plan Nap's Lo '- Denei :, ty Re ®identia�. dens�i.:Y apps�� �� ;�i.+�X for the site as well as with the applicable Olan the tegulatiohs of the R -3.5 sorr,e, and other aj„+'plioable regulations; HE RINGS OFF1:i:ER - t; Sco\PETRIE S'I P 03,-0000 PAGE 8 The proposed name of the subdivi lon (Cherry Perky is not duplicative of any otbc41 plat recorded' in Washington county c. The improvements to sT4 '14th Avenue and the creation of the private street provide for both adequate and safe a :ceas to the dote in this proposed eubdiva\MLonn The Citq of Tigard ,engineering Depa rtfent has reviewed the Dropoilal and offers the following analysis with regard to street$, sanitary sewers and stor drainage: Southwest Cherry Drive and SW 74th Avenue are both classified as Drive 40 'meet the fcal�.owing local streets. Local streets are required t standards (all distance are ftO U conterline Of right -of- sway); 25 feet of right of -way, 17 2eet Of pavement, curb and sidewalk. Southwest Cherry Drive is fully improved along the frontage of the development except for the prevision of a sidewalk. Therefore, the applicant shouldlbe reguiar04 to install e V ia ewalk along the f;a:antaage of sW Cherry Drina ' ,t y"` d and .aander�b�u'��d any:: oveac ea utiIit. e 3 a southwest 74th P►ven:ue is an unituproved legal street between SW Cherry Drive and SW Fir Street. There is 20 feet of right -of -way on each side oi7 the centerline. The applicant is prt:p0Seing to p . + .... g h the 5 feet of provide tvao ichirde street i,sa rove�men�.e aloe With additional rightM -of. =stay along the frontage of the develop heft a therein meeting local street standards. The applicant ehonld also be required to provide a »a*rn -- around at the northern tertsinns x � , ley Fire District. The which mee�a the re� ; �.remaantd of. the Tualatin Valley is propoatn ° to conotrur,t a private atrdet which will ee g ex-�ve a�i� r�ssden�ee and prnvfdC'n aooseo - t4 SW Cherxiy Drive. The private stroete as propose.- ., meete all a pihliVAbl€'a City c+taiadarda. tote one and two . are provided acdesa to the public at the ccxPer of SW Fir Street and SW 76th Avenue, right-of-Way - M �. y ., y With the except , "n there . d. � siglE31'D, . l ent occt e, public impt vementa are �hes � tiro streets are Bill 3�mp ®ved w3. are no a�i.a.�lewalka.. AA davaal ipin .. typically Ln59tal� ed to being ®u►b- etanda 'd eituationa into the pro��iision of a sidewalk i.e part of the c o�mpli.anza3. While � as - 3P`' - �t exir�t�.ing city atandla�rai foe , a local ei„reet, the Git... contends that a eideWalk she .ild be the �yreq�iirement for �aae i.na���jahalatt3.c�Bt of waived. There is approXimately 75 feet of treat frontage along this p , the site. The two proposed driveway approaches account for appro ca mately 60 feet' of this distance ( ' a feet per ort i.iian �� e tma�a:a.�r+um drivewai apron) leaving only about ,�.5 feat to be Improved. The y p .., g �. y g .., ,. likely to remaining portion of existing neighborhood fie inca� of rule is s the near Therefore, the applicant acquire i.dewa�l�. ' to future, �r .a in .. g .. �` .. a,"shouldi be re ire: t sign regarding a� non-remonstrance a reLmerat the installation of ei dewal FlgAAINGs O1'FIC nR - GR \ ASCO PETRI; St i 93-- 1009 ,.. PACE; 9 I w Sanitary Sews : lw The existing g.. inch, public sanitary sewer line l There is an a approximately 250 feet a ou:h of proposed develoPnent. The applicant i,c propo4inq to .00fn6^t to and extend to sewer line to serve this davelbpanleint. The eatis3ting line has the Capacity to accomo date this development. . 3 : Storm Drainage s The applicarst io proponing 'collect the stoma water at various points 'within the subdivision- The ,storm water will km directed toward9 the exiting t tor sewer sa1 em Which is located in SW Ch erry 1 riv$o the a pp ]icarit Shcald verify ,that the existing system +tem' had the capacity to acCoxii nodate this demelopment e The Unified Sewerage Agency has established. and the City have agreed ( - Water greed tea enforce Reeo].ut].on and Order , No. 91-41)0 Surface Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site later quality facilities or the payment of fees in -lieu of Construction. section 7.160 of the above noted Resolution avid Ord'ar cites conditions under which a fee in -lieu may be accepted. SPecifiCallYe section 7.10(ta) atateec "The site ,ie sMall compared to the development plan, and they loss of area for the on -site facility would preclude the effective development." 'The' City contends that the site is limited by the following' factorti a) This subdivision uatigng i® an in- �f3.1:1. ait P this feet. b The minimum lot size in t �aia� gone 1:0. 1 ®d� ®0 The allocation of a portion of one or more lots for a water y y an the loos of one buildable lot; alit �ar�il�.t would ��s and ) To install a facility would require ax re- configuration of the 9ubdivisiOn and an inefficient use of the land. Therefore, a fee in -lieu of the construct!k'P of Uch a facility is recommended. 36 Conioliancle .With omoreheesive Plan Potie10 1. the subdivLeioh is cane intent with Policy 2-1.X becaa u se notce Of the a . 1ication and the � ublic hearin odi this item was rr64.ride ._. PP p . . '° 9 p to the neighborhood planning b rganitat en (NPO #5) and to cwnere ace within the notification area of the Site. ad had of ro er�� _ .. p F been Placed in Tigard Timed which has advertised the time an p, aco Of the public heating to be held on this ap iicatioY. 2. In order to comply wit i olicy 4, 2,1, a denditieril ii4a,iranted to require the developer to prep ee an ezr sion - control p1a ,i een Uring compliance with eeroaian codtt61 eddhadtdd for the Tualatin River Uasi ii asa airt of tho radzng pez it appli. p tg ° . � � . It id cat x,crn. .. ndea that the developer' shall+ pale a r fee ..l.n�+ recoa�ae � 1�.ee� of the conatrruction of an on siite Water ggali.y facility. k8AAI1CS UVFSGEt - GR,5O. D `P )E i�7E suB 93 -0009 POE ..1 �,...,... a ..:..,... ,;.,'aa • • This subdivision proposal 7.3.1, and . p ��olsoeal camplies with Policies 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend public sewer and water systems to this site and will provide for underground installation of phone, e a,L!ctricity, and cable television lines. The subdivision proy oral !:omp t.es with Policy 8.1.1 and 80.1,.3 • because the propneed extension and improvements to SW 74th Avenue and the creation Of A private otray.tt within this infill subdivision will contribute to a safe and efficient streat system in this area. The c..rreation of an extension of SW Fenno Creek Drive, and the creation of the private dzivey wilt be required to roved consistent P Dr neiett�an�,�. with the City of T'�t�ard, standards for be improved public, local and private streetr , reopectively. VI. CONCLUSION AND . RECOMMENDATION The Planning DLuision concludes that the proposed subdivision,: will promote the general welfare Di Vision City not be significantly detrimental not g' re maf the Cit and will rno�. lre ,si injurious to surrounding properties provided that develOpment Which occurs after this aeei ©,xoa com p lied with applicable lieable local, state and federal lavas. In recog ition of the findings staff recommends APPROVAL of Subdivision proposal 50R 93-0009 for the proposed Cherry Park subdivision subject to th0 conditions which fallow e ALL d DNDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR ,TO O1 G THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPI,CIFIED, THE T AIL _.�.._._.... ► TMEUT, iE'OI+! � n.�r�. RECOMMENDED OC+iVi)I"iIOPdS IS CHRIS. 3UAVYE3 3I� THer,� ENGINEERING O�FAit 639 -4171. �, . ea�,bmit a revised .. tee that the 1, , !Me applicant shall plat whi�..h �1em�nstra a and 3.5 moot wide tIv ion � Of land to the private dtreet have ��-� p, and ad scent t P y'a beers iraco�rpoa,;ated into the private acG$®® tr set. A jr�.r�'t use and maintenance agreement shall be provided for the common access tract. The northern terminte of the pki:vate street shall b adjusted to the east so as to inelt a the portion Of lot 3 located between the lot 3e hammerhead and tat Lot 3561 into the main hod" of 2. Additional right•of -Way Shall be dedi ated to the Public along the SW to 'increase the right -of -way to 25 feet tom the 14th .Avenue frontage . centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right -of way centerline. Igor additional i nformation contact City of Tigard Engineering bepwAment. - ..g .tilities and . , 9 `stall SidSwalki 3 Tlhe ��ppl.3.caret shall a�cadeX � zo�nd u .. atreetlgr 1D�cive. bng the f ront� a dt the site en SO (cheeky b and install .. Street imprcaveeente, ng COncr' h�, edit � . � - inCl.udi., v wa�.ky o Standard two t -: - p - , �. • ry � � �- 1 .....� driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete aarement,� samit�1 sewer, ,storm :, g Streetlights, .... erg be installed dlx�lina the Std 74tia Aveinciia fr rafage. underground utilities shall,, ,, . - g ,. and al ®n tc .., dards and shall onf m toeei.ther the etrtaet ®tar► ... � . 9 .. ,. pp„ cont� r, acted to Loc�� .. . • gn g to j acent improvements o 7. i n went a roved alz a�►r�ent of exa.stin_ , by the Engineering r -r t© �►n � neerin De p a Ment. N( Two third street i mprovemehta ° � � p HEARINGS OFFICER - GI ASGo \PEmIE SUS 93 -»0009 PAGE 11 • . • r • • . • inca °swade standard half - Street improvements plus a driving „ ]fan's in the opposi�s direction to ensure Bafe two -way traffic. 5. agreement by applicant,. On' forms Pfvovided by An ®hall. be executed b the a lira the City, wrh `ch waives the property owner's right to Hoppose or remonstrate against a fttutre Local Improvement District formed to install Sidewalks along SW 7 r Street and SW 76th Avenue. 6. Two (2) nets of detJiled public itiaprovement pans and p °xf ifs construction drawings shall be submitted fox pweli.mi nary revie° to the Nngan eering Departaent . Sevea ( ? ) ®ti of approved drawings and ono (1) itemisad construction coot eati iatg` all prep atg d by a Professional Engineer, sh =11 be submitted for final review and approv7al.r (NOTi ese piano ,re in dc i1" ; to any drawings rec :.t�.red by the Euilding _, bivision arAd should only indirde sheetb relevant to public improvemento . 9. An erosion control plain shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings The plan shall conform to "Ero ®ion Control Plana - Technical guidance Handbook, November 1989. The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage, Agency Resolution and Order No. 0i -47. NOTE: This is a twc part fee which is paid at separate ti aiea. The first part is paid with an y associated public im p rov enent8 f or that po r Of g the d eve lopment which increases the iaperv►ioto area within t p ublic nf.-wa y. The Second part is paid the i of Permit issuance and is for each individual ?lot. The applican rate that storm drainage runoff can mantbe nt shall demonstrate discharged into the existing drairnag ays without signif , y impacting properties downs:. rc am. Storttn drainage details eIiali be provided as part of the public 10. ,� and a iaan rovement ans. Calculations a ; topographic ima of she s torrf P p -. p provided s a suppler ilt to the draiin�age bay ®,tn service area r�ha1�. be r�ov3.ded a pull "ent of the serviceable area, Th8 location and capacity° of eicn roverent plans. Calculation shall be based on fu11 dev � existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed" 11. A grading plan shall be submitted = howiirng the existing and, '' proposed contours and t ieitl finia�hed floor elevatione on each lot, inci.udirng � p., • � the ��rsp of elevation8 at 4 different corners of the floor plan til d to curb elevations as Shown on the public imProvcbment p1ans4, 12. The applicant s3hall make an ay ointment for... a pre,- conatr ction meeting with the Lit . of Tig . g g p_ ter app:ozal cif the ub ..ar it provement planar but before beginning of � y :'" ire ' a �.., site: The p � _, arming work on 4:a„�: 1 a a�c� En riser s applicant, the applicants ° e eng.lneer and contractor shall be regiaired to attend this Meeting prior to receiving the avproved plans and perutits. 13. Construction of the propo9fld Pdblibs i.m 3roveif ., ots : and issuance of l ins Permits i shall inr - ct� inmenr� uai ii the ets g lane . L g b peQt men tiheb iewed and approve' p ... P p i° opening Btn d the >i�r�lia ii�9' xOVea� raw permit or appropriate eonstxuet ::o p ' • g �/ ` been -� ,n com �. vaan e a reei�e�tt s Yaave ER RIWGS aFJ°ICSR - a tASC \?ETi uE'' suit 93_0009 r � 't to. PAGE 12 executod, :.,a. ' deve1aper- engineer agreeme itt ',hat been exe¢�ut�a' end , pem %Lt, fees hare been paid, Prior to •the plat being recorded witkn Waeh3,ngtQxa 'County, b applicant 0ha4 provi,de ...eit:ber 100 pert ni iaeri�o iaxec a eUraxa e c 1 t e . c:� Cc itmerlt 4 ►e an a 001 id it may w ord' t ie t .# of ,ez • ti 110. iub1 . 010t0veementi ' have beep ceps ed b t 4O Cir o. Tigard a t *e ap lit,ant. hae poeted the apps± r3:a e Z 'izsi n ,d"ltso Ecarie ., tree rebmcvel permit' ehal l submitted which specifies ,these trees ,ticb are th be removed In cra .cn with thLeori ;`,LittOvertsents. This tree reincva . per aai t be applied i; r ar's • �id;�xoved by the Planning:' )iviaLon prior to the' al, of removal any euch tweet; ®- Lte . s'mAFr CONTACTS V& ctor Adonti, Planning Division. T4E . APPLICANT SHO'i... •a) BE BEQUXRED ',A COMPLY W T Tp.,Foratiowirio Pin? I ONS ?". UOR Tuo ISSUma CF BUIZOING. PE} I ."t g 1 io A tree removal pe rnit submitted which tipemifiert those trees Which ar e td 'be reuw � eo sixieohion construction. of. reeidehcaa. A tr ee removal ,its obeli' be applied a:oa end, �approweci y Planting .Division prior the re va trees on-site. , , car Adoinri Planning Diai r� any on the, P ct 9 0 suc ' tr 3T � yi a AFP �C+Q1��'i�tal�' SUiti v Y /014 AppAovNI, S� g E v� a IS Sip YTTED NITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS CF THE 8 EFFECTIVE mHIEcaH�a. Prepared By: Apps' Ron Pomeroy A ai®tafl$ planfe AI 4/ e tt rya Li c k Say. rudt nrUf Senio P ar eier L BEARINGS OFFICE. CRASCO\PE 'RXE S11S 93"'0009 Cog. _ �a Dat it Fl RS; 4i-•V IL L AGE; CON DO:tltMtUMS LOOP JoHN W. 13405 SW 74TH TIC► oR 97223 AGENDA ITEM BEFORE THE LAVID USE HEARINGS 'd3 TIGER FOR THE CIT�'F OF TIGARPt OTtE( O Regarding an application by Craig Petrie on behalf STAF ': REPORT of Graoco Investments and Raymond Edna for subdivision SUB 93 -0009 preliminary plat approval. I. SAX OF THE REQUEST C!sEg Subdivision SUB 93 -0009 St ►RY a Thm applicant requests subdivision reli rina� plat approval to Pp g y r nging from 1divide 7 528 square feet in size. Sias of these � � 19 acxae .site into �.�. ®in 1 ®� -famil late ' lots are l0, 027 to � �► proposed to be accessed by a private Qty. °eef. APPLUCANT: Craig Petrie 10262 SW Brant Road Lake Dawego, OP 07035 OWNERS: Graaco Investments 10300 SW Century Oak DriV Tigard, OR 97223 Raymond mond and Phyllis Ems 13400 SW Fir Street Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low-Density, Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R ,N3.5 (Resident e,ali 3.5 units per acre) e, The northwest Cori 'ier .. intersection cif SW 76th Avenue, .. of the inter �►OCATgONs 13400 � a ;Lots in 3�6n� 74th Avenge and SW Oher Drive, and two additional between. (1 TM 221 /DC, tax lots 3300, 3400, 3606 and 3501 y d'' hapt re 3.48, . 18 85, 1S «92, 14 aao2 ,r 0 and 18.164 and .om r Q 1 « . ]L,I:�'�E LAW g: cona�unit � ®v ®lo rat cede Chu t��xa 1� APP �. 1�,1��D, .15.16. � p k lad � nlio,i® 4 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 74.4, 8.1.1, and 8,1.3: STAFF RECOMMENDATIONt Approval subject to conditions. 1I. FINDINGS ASOUT SITE AND 'SURROUNDINGS- ;fir BackgrO and . Info -mationa ��The . ti ►q /bide were created ,., through eepa h... + tit and eceee ® « � lle� NO. 2 S�abdi�+iei�.rbn, adl,�auent to the rrlcesee ®f i The - .ling Hi Platted ;.L i Octel'i?r 1962. Ths�tre have been no other plannin biv�is on reviews t Th0a erieting single P � or arnie el�.i. e. fi�.y �denCe Was built .. _ a . g .. did *tit r qn� - . , . ., reiai � t aiaany years a o' a.�[�ii d� a ire � plat.�kn�.inst review. HEARINGS OFF,Z ER GRAEcu®PE9. nIE stia 03 -0009 PAGE 1 1, • p. icinit Information and Sure undicag k .ng This 3.5 acre site JO located on the west side of SW 74th Avenue and north of SW Cherry Drive. The northers portion of this site is adjacent to the intersection of SW Pir Street and SSW 76th Avenue. The Properties° on all sides of thils its are developed with single family homes. Loth; to the oast of this site, across SW' 74th Avenue, are zoned C -P, (Commercial Professional) The balance of thy. sVrarounding lots are Zoned 1 tt-S» 5 qAeeic',ential 3.5 units Per acraj l x x o sit®' meacEitbtio! An existing single family � � `Avent�e� The ..esidence i© located at the northern► *tnd of the site. Accezc to this residence i g gained from Sw 76th site generally slopes toward the south with the taajor�4 ty of the el;epe' near the S&W Cherry Street right -Of.4 ay. Trees are located through ut the sit:e and are pri sharU.y clustered in the northern and the southeast cornerre of the Property. The majority of these trees are Cottony 'tod, Aspen and fruit trees. APPLICABLIA APPROVAL n-- Dew�elent .dodo,. 1:. chapte 18 a 48,r'j 50 contains sttirndard3 fOr the R -3.5 zone. A single- family cletached resideneiiat unit is , z, permitted u s in this zone and must comply ply with the following dimen®ianal retltrennente: Minimum lot Site Front setback Garage setback Interic s deyard setback Corner eideyaard setback Rear setback WaxiMum building height 10,E J00 equate feet 20 feet 20 fef S f et 20 Pest 15 feet 30 feet • Chapter 1848800.42.01/1.1 c reaidentia lC� develo a t. l A lot Meets the basic go arr access lot etas ",curd if it has a north -south dimension of 90 feet or more and has a front lot line that is oriented within 30 degrees cif a true OG subdivision c , piiee with the requirement eaet� west axis. A eubc� y � ���; the basic re inement if 80% or mor•,, of the seemsllr Orb rented lots Meet or a teed this standard. . . a 3 chapter 18 � 92 :02iD con�,+�i, a for density. the number of ta ... � na �tandaard dwelling units permitted id based on the net development area, la 0 _ . dedicated - d area io then divide r�x �arlss, o� for � rivet g� acoae%�a�s� 1 �3:e lr�n for Ini.ic roe d by the mini roaiuu,+►' parcel Size permitted by the zoning district to determine tAe number of lets► which' MAY be created on A Site, Chapter 18.102.030 specifies /iaion clearano =' triangles adjacent to intersections in which the height of plantings, e$gne etc. are limited to three feet in height to assure safe and adequate sight HEARINGS Q 'PXCER - G SCO\PET... B sUB 92-0009 pAdt 2 :1 distance at 11ntersoction4 ,to reduce', pot ry;4nt, ,: +i hazardg :. fro n vehicular turning Movements. Alternative3Ly,1 , trees nay be li aMed p to eight fleet in b igh ; * • Chapter- al4108.0%fil contain da de 40b s nglk.,ismily resi.�ent.iaal vehicular ,ace ee® ILIr vate, driven may px 6 access, � � ov�.d6 ,arar 4 maxi aa/ant of six residenceme 0 A C n pri vate aocenaw&y� which aervas between 'three tQ 3iX reed a4derlcbe 'must be a Mini are !,0f, 30 Feet wide wi h a mini&num pavemane Width of at least 24 feet, curbs and a walkway. • Chapter 18. i.E0.0200, 4 recquBerea a permit fet removal of trees havin a trunk 6 in „�esi `�r 9 chore in diameter measured four feet g. `� �..� „ � ,E �dea'a_ Criteria' as ei . ��sifigc� alcove the ground da, undeve�le d. res tial land A peraoit• for' re ovel mush: o ring p4► tree o�apl�r witdn the fo &lay, in Chapter 113.A.14.4 2.(1.42L61: a. The treed arc diseataled,4rolient a dancer to Property, or interfere with utility service or traft ;Lc eafetrs ►. the trees have to be removed to conetruot pcoposed imnprovemente or to otherwise utilize tho app1Icv nt' e property in a reasonable Manner; • The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, is atabi ity, or drainage problem . The treat are not needed to protect nearby t °eee ae windbreaks or as a desirable balance betWoesl bean* apes apace; e. The aesthetic character in the area Will not be visually adversely affedted. by the tree r uoval; and . New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, Will replace the ae -thetas vaalt a of ttesa to bo Cut. • Chapter .. Standards for the ubdividing of er 18180.4�60 � conta��.n® e s� an l�ce.•� into 4 0� more. cat �� b T. � _ the TO as loved, a Pre �.,.�.� . arN plat , � Yiana�.0 flnuat c,,� ely with h following criteria: The proposal dust corpiy with the City's omprehensivee ..., .. g ordinance and other applicable Plan, ' the applicable �aninb ordi?sna, ordinances and ree la 6ionsa s The propa ® ed p lot name ��nt not be duplicative and must otherwise satisfy th0 provisions of ORa Chapter 92i e The Streets and rcada moat be laid out so as to cOnfo h to the plats of subdivisions and )maps of pa rtifiirans or subdi vi = ions already approved for ad jcini ig property na to width, general direct nn and in atlZ Other respects uhle i4� the City determines it is in the public interest to t a dif iii the strecit or road pattern; and E . i100 OFFXCER dRS PET1tIk „3011 91 0009 An explanation ha o provided for a improvements. • Chapter 18.164.060(A) l r etatOm that the depth of an iota shall not exseed 2 --1/2 timed the average lot width. 10. Chapter 18.164 also contains ' aatandarcid for Eatre ®he and tt tilitie ®. The applidable standards are as frail ow;n s ao Section 180164.030 requirrae streets within and a adorning a dovalog ent to be dedicaa &; d and improved based on the claaeifLoation of the otreet. • Section 18.16, 4.030 (E, a (a i required local etreete to be constructed ' with 34 feet of pavement Within a 50 foot right -o '+-way. c.. Sectioh 18.; 6 .0 prohibL4a let depth from beta/ more than 21 times the let width, and requires that :iVotO have at least 25 feat of front age on e,itborj public or private struts, other than an alley. 1. Section 16.164.070 requires sidewalks aid joining all residential atreeta. • Section 1S.,164.090 requires *sanitary ear service. . section 18.16A. ;19,0 req iree adequate provieione for atoms water runoff and dedF at on Of eaeen t a for otorui drainage faci li ;, ieee 11c1921.9 raeheAref, 1. Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phase^ o the planning and develo a<y nt review process. . policy 4.2.1 pi ovIdea I :at all daite1opniaret, within the Tigard urban planning area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standinxcle. D. Policy 7.1.2 provides the Cit „ Will . tie z��- _ire ae conditiran di~ develc. ent arprovtal that pUblic atet7 , deWar, a m d etorm drainage will be proviOed and designed tit) dity Standards and uti:ltiiae placed andezegrotitidi e Pci1Lcy 7.3 T 1 provides the City will ootliridinate water 'services with water dL.®trides. • Po.. . Policy 7.4. � ireo�.3rer� all n de��C�loga�iient to oe cor�r�aect�ld to an approved a itn itv,,ry eerw3er ayatea . Z%RxNCs' o °Fxc ii - 6RASCC1 \PE Iffi t3 t 93 -0009 nag . 4 ■ ti ?s . Policy 7.6.1 requires that the development be served k;,a a water system having adequate water pressure for fire protection purposes and that the Fire List:r ie t review all such applications. Policy; 81.1 provides the City will plan for a safe and efficient n. . < current need :; and anticipated mr ,set and roadway e,��l4e1�1 than. ai+cyats� cu :suture growth . id development. Policy 8.1.3 provides the ' City will require ' am a precondition of approval that: pm dedicated atridiat ola have other adequate a. i]evebo ent abut a eleedftie�. access; h. street right -of- way shall be dedicated whertk the street is substandard in width o Them developer shall commits to constru *t cn of the streets, durbe s sidewalks to City standards taithin the dav lopment o ¢t. The developer shall partit spate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, aTrd c; t:Walks to the extent of the development's impacts; e. Street improvements shall be made and °tree': signs or ai uals shall he provided when th ders► o pment is f oUnd to create or intensify a traffic hazard. IV. NPD & AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application ation and has noted that any retaining wall over 4 feet in height, measured from the bottom of the footings to the top of the wall., readires a permit from the Building Division. No provisions have been made for storm drainage from lets 1 and 2, and possibly 41, 7 and 9. If the existing house on lot 1 is on a septic system and is to remain on such, the tank and drain €iee1d must be within the lot perimeters. V reviewed thin application and V has noted that ti-as proposed de� elopnnent is projected to generate 4 new student® for Phil LeWid El amentery School; 2 n etude,: nts at Fowler Middle ScihoOl, and 1, new Student at V .gard Nigh Echo The School ietrict noted that the school capacity at heel the High already exceeded, aithoagh both Phil Lewis El4i,ment d ` sal an:� �'owlear AlictcsJ.e t�chc� presently below capacity. a �J ;,s t noble fc�caility arm � ;' ` .. '1°h „ tric Of the High School eta ineufficicnl _to be ee to donside r potable e additions6 hdditional school capacity may► be provided by other options ender consideration by the S, ._ ict, include g level chool i�ietr • rn, .g grade sets .: i rat c,on, reanshod °.sled school ye ci boundary a► . juotme�nte, double shifting, busing to under utilized f lities p future bond .,a0adUr@ leading .. r school. housing sin” .' tat con ®t:r�actiou Of anew facil�tic�® �ne� rathe options t3 OFFICER = Gh iSta \PETHIE SUB 93 -0009 ��tl,NGR OZ F' PAGE 5 OA • ri • • "'ni. , i ' "1 Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPR' ,i6 haai9 reviewed this pre poaal and has stat .:1 that !,hey are connerneta about th3 qualit y. of tbt storm water runoff from' this• project 1 affect septic aysteme ` et and how tl�ie veil it adjacent propevtiei 'C . ral Tele h'One .ve viewed this ;aft licatic►n and has commented that the developer igh %,,,a, is � Ptatact GTr4 30 days prior to tl* opening of the utility trench. Tualatin Valley Water' Distriot has reww+edl, this application and has commented th'ra t the Roadway ®t be publicly dedicated for water dihitrz.ct access.. Sewer and water lines should have at least 10 feet of separation. � he► (:ittr Of Tigard Public Worl.3 Oivieion, Portland General Electric, and the 1ue,>;6.4n Valley Fire Distrit)t have reVittied this proposal and have Offertri no t On nente or ob jectiof►a. `. EVALUATION P.EatiTEST The proposed eubdivieioz complies wAth th use standards of the A -3.8 zoning district (Section 6.,060) because the lots' are intended, to be developed as Single- family radidencea. angle family residences ar,a listed as a ra r pitted use in this Ac*. The P po se which .tangs in 'size, between 10,027 and 18,628 ].�, ro eed 1*ot all arger than the minimum square feet, are all ,ei�:h���x equal �c as. (10,000 square requirement fc�r lot aizo in this zone s are feet for dingle family uae) • AB shown on the preliminary plat dated 3 -2 -93, the existing residenco on,Lrbaohed into the required setbacks on lot futdber one. gr. a letter from lire Petrie, which yeas ktitdOiVtici by the Planning Division on April 26, 1993, it is re po ted that the lot' line between iota 1 and 2 be adjusted to the West to pr Vide adeq ate s. tlbacks for the residence on lot one. This adjUatilastit way ld catxs-e lot one to increase to 14,603 aquarre feet in Size. All proposed VAS shall be subject to the setback. sitaandarde of 0,0 3.6 tone.' comptiatkis with tUei a standards will hoe r'e'viewed a part of the builditg permit a PPl lcation procesa, fir residential atructures. Lobs 6 and propose 4 ,� ,. f land in tbe.ik d 9 r+a ee to include rn��rc�w , 9, ►:,ewe o lots O.rea6 which run along each sidb Of ‘;'..he proposed private street. These two ateas znc asura 3.5 X 160 fit►ry lot 6 (560 square feet) and 7 X 122 for lot 9 (354 ailivilara feet). _ The city is reoomw tend &lag the following ci anus's to tite design Of the private street which will Make it less of a MAintefiarIce burden to all those concerned: A. the / foot str;:,p along the east side of the pri v me street part Lot ., ) .� rPo .i.. . I the axis art.. of Lo � should bpi inco rated �ai`�r, she privatO street; HEARINGB ®T'FIciR - GRAB \PE ERIE NUB 93-0009 PAGE 6 A. The 3.50 foot strip along the west side of the private street ( shown as part of Lot 6) should be incorporated with the Private street; and . The strip of land on Lot 3 which is between the hammerhead and the adjacent property to the easy rest. r should �, � ,; Lot .'�5(Dl $ ®h be incorporated with the 'private ►,t Alter: etivvely, the private street should be shifted to the east so as to cause this strip to be incorporated int() the main body of lot tire's This adjustment will caua►e 'lets 6 snd 9 to be less than the 10,000 �,� f,m required of parcels square foot lot minimum „Lot size which Lo the R-3.5 ne. Therefor�'�, the applicant shall provide w that all lots shall continue to meet this plat which demonstrates , ode standard. During the dj MMttnent of these lot lineso the applicant should monitor the lot depth to width ratio of let number seven. It is recoarouefderi that a joint use and maintenance agr.w ement be provided for the private street. 'including the portions of land specified in A and B above. Three of t as lets (lots numbers 1, , 2 and fJ) meet the basic solar access requirements as specified in Code Section .1 8 1 :, " Lila. �, 'is wig h ,n 30 deO�reea 4 ` r ofetrue east -west (flag lots May chinos* which ie the front lot of � lime) . These Iota also provides a min mUm north - south. dimension of at lea t 90 fesL 4 The balance of tese lots either do not Meet the front lot line orientation anal \gar the 90 foot north-so,v:th lot dimension : ege, irement L the I1 pgc, lased Iota, two . (specificelly,F 2.2 lots) mayi.b`� aced tion from these lot cAuntead as the stancisr�i 2O'�� ® p and 4 are reauirene nta. Th o 3 ®� Y �, 4 � these atanderds . The six reiainin ltd (lots 6 throug e are acre p to 1 by staff is eXce pions to these standards as per tecti en 8 t10� 'r 1 e : 1 i a ` . rth- south orie tat ion Of SW 74th Avenue p r.w1 ran � The I�e� causes lots 6, 10 mid 1.t to orient their fri3►nt lot linen in a north- -south alignment all;t therefore do not or,', iform to the base r this code section � The t. .: otl 6 and .. � .... ~ry e� in the base tea in �.a �; lest® � l ` �� adu . rema iirement® of t�', dram me g �' `` both ii►"��bmk�ent !9 to beat the placement o ned the ro sedgy private atr� acet and the conf iguratio 7) are con ent of th p lac p' � � , n of the site. To require Etel.et compliance with these standards: would reduce the overall density on this site. It La recommended that these e o,..t nin g two iota be e x the solar aoeyesa ree,�pted from Lrementi�, 4ccot ng to the above referenced j the to the and4. ~Therefore,, the reckdirentente of theirac ar aaceSS re ,� design stand ..; i : n .. p, have been Met by this 'propeaal e. p�rtfon of tide Development Code 3. the ro Seed .aubdiviaLOn conrpi _ .. . chspth the .. � ... d.s i p � iee With itflti deansai+t ' ata'ine�ar�aa eye. 92 020 (Density). pable area of the chapter : xiee net dee�re (after deduttien of the r' a -way) is Mpproxistat014 1210994 squa7cO feet (2,94 acres) ® the groan site in approximately 3.2 acres. With a minimum lot site of lOtiO00 sildOre feet pet lot4 HEARINdS of ;rCE - GB SCO\PATRZ SUB 9. 0009 PAGB x A r� this site y ieida opportunity it.or 12 dw`a ling' -wnite une (er the ... R-3.5 zoning designati'zn (apeciti oally+ :1.2,08 lots) . The ap plicant has proposed the creaiaioao of 11 lots aat',d thereby complieB with this standard. Chapter 4. 2 (V .aue,i Clearance) req%.iles that adequate vision be provided all 7;;;O ad ,intereeptioria. trhir standard aahall be aatiefied by adheren!Ma to the reemirementies regarding the height a ei p laceme t of an}) future. n i 1e lbetructt pna including a 'eubdiviuion identificataon i g Prior to the _ i talla tion of any ouch sign, a sign_ permit trots the P .arnni'ng Department' Musty obtained. The sign ]grit, review and approval 1:4:60®o will reguig.e a finding that the sign will 'be con$ietent teithh the requirements of Chapters 1 P .���� �i�.ie� � �leara nce and 18.114 Section 18.491 (Access) and Section 3.8 ,641 O6O B (Lot Frontage) are satief Led. All lots are provided with at least 25 feet of either pub) applicant roadway frontage au required by Section . 16.164. The a app npproposes .ti.o eontitiaue to provide access to private lots 1 and 2 from the intersection of SW Fir street and SW path Avenue. Lots 8,10 and 11 are PeOposed to be served by SW 74th Avenue. The remaining six lots are proposed to be served by a private street heading northward and proms SW Chersry trivia. his Witt red by Secti&t proposal conpliesa with the access aa�risa►io�asa re���i. 18.108. Therefore, these code standards have .bs-en Nets of ied. 6 e Section 18. 164 e61�1 ul \ 1 ib (Lots) v r rRattis1g lot � tT t?r�� s�t.a$H1 that the depth to width . rat 2-4/2 to One. Lot 7 m teft trait standard with an average ratio of 2.x'48 to 3.. All other are also in compliance ' n. The:efrarer all of the p ` po _d e node section., '� The � r1� s� lots are ccelfOrmance with this standards 3_:5ti . ®2G l 1 �� Tree Removal) r he applicant �- rea�tirae 'that '� 7 a, applyofor,3.. and receive, approval for, a tree remcr al .. permit ?riot' apply to the removal or any tree measuring 6 inches or greater in diameter et a height o? four feet above grade d pr a i o th haS been removal h, of any such tree from the Site. A detailed y,. submitteAd as part of thin applicatioii: Prior to the issuance Of a treo removal permit, the a ' .cant shall specify the trees being . ed t61* .) public )rovem ruts, r® est ...:. readmovs.�. as stha� �celate to s 1 y P .. and 2) building envel pe e proposed aubdiviainn 1.bh cons:ietent with t S. The the approval standards of chapte ,�,_.� .vis ocs q r 18.1fs. oFQ� A Stab because„ me proposed eub i vieion complie s _ with the Comprehensive Haan m Tie Low-Density Residential density oppo nit ' for the site as well as with the applicable plan policieb, the regulations of the R-3.5 zones a 1d other applicable regulationse fl 00.6` biFPIet t -Y GPASO ® \PBTRXE SUB 0$0000.,.. ft aJ • • The propo 'Sed name of the subdivision (chervil Park) La not duplicative of any other plat recorded in Washington County; • The improvoments to SW 74th Avenue and the creation. of the P p private street provide for both adeqUate and safe &cease to the lots in this proposed auibdiv ®ion • The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed etae proposal and offers the fo1 loWing analysis% with regard to streets, ®anitary ae'Wers and storm drainages a . Gig ` eltii it Southwest Cherry Driv0 and SW 74th A ve uedare both clar�Bified as local streets. Lora: , stre�et�� ar q to meet the following e. of right -of -wsY)a 25 t . (all �; _�y�p, 17 feet of pave�al�.ne c�f� � g andarfde i � distance are from' wpoezte e:nt/ c+url� and rcl®°rraalk. Bret o .. right Southwest Cherry Drive is full improved ales .. e y ng the, frcanstaga of the cevelO, -►: exee � for the prel,idion of a sidewalk. Therefore, the applicant Should be required' to install a side watk a3.ong the frontage of SW Cherry Drive and ntndderground any overhead uttlitie e4 a vatlhwe ®t 74th Av dal street batweo- n., :SW en Fir Street. There to 20 feet of right of -wag► Ch���rrc°y► ��,�cive and SW nh aide Of the Centerline. D .rtie applicant i s pre/peeing to the 5 feet o �. i�vao- thirds Street �ampr'cavr,fnte al.eng► witht rad. ��1 right -of« wa y along tine: frontage of th b do ieloper+ent, $rsacih „4,1•1 tilteetiaeg local etre3 ®t start►dagda C, She p Vie► d ateo he stiO uirc d to provide a tia rn�a to uatmd at the pnorthern ou a .flu® wh:,ch meets the red iron ® nt® othe Tualatin V Fire Dieu. t. The applicant is propbaing to construct a► privmte atreet Y,tthich will 'eerue ei. reeidencee and provide ancceaa to SW Cherry Drive. street, as rop Med, meats all applicable City she prime �,..� P e / M._ ` are proi�ided access to the public `�tann�dard� 'S. .. Lute One and, of SW Fir: $,treet and sW 76th iv�enue, rig�nt- of -wa. at the . ; " that there Theae two etre+ta are full improved tai` ov u e ..0 4Lc ._ .r e � s develo ®nt o�c ��� , p e e�� ®in eraeflit�! are t: iaa.'Uy instal.; Tinto are n+. B�z�iewa .ka. A of a eiciew&tik id pert o l ®d . to brine ®uh e�tan�i�d ai,tuat�.on.e . .. .. e�ion � the oa�pl lance . '�hi1.® the gar ®v�. .. � exiating City standard for r. local 'Street, the City contends► that . � . ehbuld Yee t %e re " ireanient for the' inui�s�llatir�n of a aia�ew�alk Wailed. There La approxI4Eitel 7 t ... roattage a`ic�ng *hid �► feet of street f � .. - The p : roadbed Uocou tt* p ieyn of the site. Tae t�bo re;►�+.�eed drew ®wa,�° aFp ter ta�Pp y thie diatannc a (e w:14 sari 30 felt per ro�cimatel: 60 feet .. � ; d« g �, Thar �.' y y � f about 15 to a �olilmel � to dn'i�Yewa apron l®av' iinin.. po ea the exiating nei hborhoo �L! not g rtiona rensa ..toe _ �nsrei reelleant qu � 'Sidewalk® ie� the near f�it,nre.; Thor®fo.: e, t�'niE� ap ac i� g ...... aralL0 should be re it ®d t© ®i � n a i:�on�retmoreetr�ce ay �� � 9 9 the i ndtallation of 'Sidewalks' FTRL . 0J-0009 r � M • d 13. • Sanitary Sewer: Thsre is an existing 8 inch public sanitary aewer line located approximately 250 feet soeth of proposed development. The applicant Ls proposing to connect to and extend to eewwt i;ine to serve this development. 7C,.e existing line has the c8pacity to accommodate .odate this development. ▪ Storm Drainage: The applicant is proposing to collect the ,tom wai >er at earloua points within the subdivision. The storm water will be dir: -cted towards the existing etc m Bawer eystem which is located in SW Cherry Drive. The apps, .ceet should verify th .. t the existing system has the capacity to accommodate this development. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the city has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order NO. 91.47), Surface 'tater Management Regulations requiring the conotiruct.on of one -flits water quality facilities or the payment of fees in -lies of construction. Sections 7.10, of the above noted Resolution and Order ; cites conditions under which a fee in-lieu may be accepted. Specifically, Section 7.10(b) states, "The site is small compared to the development plan, and the _ to ®s of area for the on -site facility would preclude the effective dsvelbpment. °' The City contende that the site is limited b y the, following factors: a) This subdivision is an in -fill situation; b) The minimum lot d'9,ze in this zone is 10,000 equate feet. The allocation of portion of one or more lots for a water quality facility would mean the loss of one buildable lot; and c) To install a facility would require a r®- configuration of the subdivision and an inefficient USe of the Nand. Therefore.:, a foie in -lieu o � of the construction of :such a facility is recommended. ga + oiiapce With Cotta xre%fensive Plan Policies The subdivision is consistent with ith Policy Z.1.1 because notice of the application and the public hearing on this item wain provided to the neighborhood planning o7iganitation (NPO #5) and to owners of property within the notification area of the site. An ad has been placed in Tigard Timed which has advertised the time and place of the public hearing to be held on this application. 2. In order' to comply with policy 4.2 e 1, a cb diftion is warranted to require z p trod. plan ensuring p per. pa,� +�ICQ an �rodiox� control. compel ance®with ero iono c o trol standards for the Tualatin River Basis as part of the groding permit application. It id recommended that the davelopar ®hall pay a fee -Le -lied of the c natrti tien of an ore -site water q aali� y facility._ HEARINGS OFFICER - GRASCO \PETRIE sum 93 . 0009 +7 PAGE 10 M r.A • • This aui alt proposal es p 1.2, 7.3.1, ez:d 1.4.4 bey v s � the applicant will extend puk7lie sawed ,: ` and water systems to this site and will provide for underground installation of phone, electricity, and cable bell vielon li.nea. • The s ubdtviaion proposal complies with PoliC t8.81.1 4an� 8.3..3 because the proposed extension and improves 7 Avenue and the creation of a private street within this inf subdivision will contribute to a safe and efficient atreet system in this area. The creation of an extension of SW Panne Creek Drive, and the creation of the private dive, will be required to be improved t with the City of Tigard star arde for roved coila�a�tera public local anCl private street°, respectively. VI. a: MCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division cancluden that the propvas s:1 suk s ivi tioa . will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detric ,sntal nor tn jurn ®te to a +drroun. din g properties r ®v,�d�d that de v occura a fter his do cieLon complies with applicable local, Mato and federal laws. In recognition of the findings staff recommends APPROVAL of Subdivision proposal SUB 93-0009 for the proposed Cherry Park subdivision subject to the conditions which follo w„ 1tL ONDIT.tt i5 slam DE SAT /SF/ED OR FINANC ALI ' ASSURED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT WASHINGTON COUNTY'. U! L S OTHERIIPIZSE SPEC /PIED, Zia STAFF CONTACT FOR AItL RE00104BNLIED CGa► ITION3 IS cHytasnAvu J{ IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, 639 -.4171. 1 The applicant man submit a r 'l k.sed plat which deanon®tratos that the 1 f. p . j p.- a street have 7 and 3,6 .oat wide portions of lead adjacent t+o the private bee'c9 incorporated into the priwite ace®scs tract. A joint une and haa�co agreement ,,,F.. street aa►h `' 1 h® ail �a;st ®d to et. The northern t®rrtoiasue of the bpb i,vut ®d et £�� the a� common �aacea�s tsat&ae oast so as to include the portion of lot 3 legated between the hanetterhead aid Tax Lot 3501 into the Main body of lot 3. 2,. Additia nadl right -of- -Way shay.l Via® dedicated to the Public along tht S 4. .,. the tied t� the ear. -, feet f .ef �a� 74th Avenue frontara to &acresee the ri ht.o mwa to 25 from' the centerline. The deeecription Hall be tied Latin' rights - y centerline. Per additional information Contact City of Tigard Engineering Department. The a . 3 PP Meant shall undesgroiand istilitieet and etreetli.ghte; and inetall a sidewalk, along the frontage a the cite on SW Cherry Drive. 4w Standard two- third® street i.mprovementS; including concrete eidewa1k, drivetva:.. .. .. _ ._ .... r m�snt, daraitary a ®wer etaa�a drainage ►i,reetlighte and underground utilitiee shah be inet:alied along the SW "4th Avenue frontage. Improvemohte eaY all be designed :and Coo etrudted to local street etandarde and a hall oonfotna tO either the alignment of existing- adjadent impt0,000ehtd or to ah aiignment APPedl eii by the Engineering Depar°tnaent a kftti, Tway -third street iln01edit .aente HEARINGS OFFICER GRASCO \PETRIE e36.$13 03 -000'0 PACE in'eLude standard half- street i&proveinents. glue a opposite direction to ensure safe two -way traffic. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the city, which waives ` the property owner's r tght to oppose cur remonstrate eAgillnwt a future Local improvement District formed to inetail sidewalks along SW �r Street and SW 76th Avenue. Two (2) note oX detaailed publi /*Improvement plans and profile, cQnat .ruction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to .the e Engineering Department Seven (7) eete of approved drawings and Dune (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Profeebional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval. (NOTE These plans are in R diti®n to any drawing® required by the Building Division and should only include aheets relevatn;t to public improvemente.) An erosion control plan [shall be provided as part of the Public itaprovement drawings. The plan shall conform to "'Creation Control plu s Technical Guidance Handbook, NeVeMber 198. The applicant shall pay the fees ae established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at separate times. That first part is paid with any associated public improvements for that portion of the development which ingresses the impervious area within thcr; public right- ofpway. The second part ita paid at the time of Dui1:ing Permit iaauance and to for each individual lot. The applicant al demonstrate Q et storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the isting dr binsgeva s without significantly impacting properties downstream. lob storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement pla , is • Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin service area shall b. provided as a supplement to the public i mprevement plane. Calculatiens shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future linias shall be addreese i A grading plan Shall be eubmitt .4 showing the existing and proposed contour3 and typi.cai f iniehed floes elevations on each to t, Including elevations at 4 lAffer6nt Cornere of the floor plan tied to the top of curb elevatiozia alga shown on the public improvement } Pp apPraintan construction meeting with hilt, City eo�a Tigard Engineering �Dey artmeri � after approval of the publid improvemet.‘t plane but before beginni ng work On the site,. The applicant, the applicants engineer and contractor shall be required to attend this meeting prior to receiving the approved plans and pOrmite. CmnStructio the P. o P.. , and issuan e o . 'n of `-he ro o®ed public �ar��►raJv�,.mentd f g comm ence until the ngineering Department has 1�ui:ldin Peran�.tg sin�al.l not co revi.e4►ed and a 'proved the u and .. p ., public .. p � rate plans ® a stre� =t opening bl i� im rove�►e petit or appropriate construction compliance agreements have been driving laws in the BEARINGB OFFICER - Si Sco`PETEIE • . [f executed, a ds 7eleper -eng seer aagraiein n raarmit bees; have brat ' pAid ekecuted and .a i Q Prior •t0 the plAt being recorded with Tlaabington County the applicant, shall provide `ither a 100 :Percent par�Ormance aesur ce. or l it ; etter of aogroeni ent. A ,;an ,aiterntitf ve, the aPp .icant naay tec,nA the plat, of f4r, the 1is impro �;eme me . have been ae - :; e A } . the O ty '�,l g l( an the applicant has posted, qty appropriate tiaintenence Bond: I) s A tree removal permit hhall • euleitted which sPecifies those trees which Are to he re nc vad ; . t e. .a t ; trua ian ©f s o , e u, Thitt " tree .realVirel Permit Shall bO applied for and approved by the Planning DL Le ion prior to the rerun its of any such 'trees 011- l9S�.trd. STA*F CCNTACT $ .VictOr Adentie Planing ,Divi iono TUB 1PPJXCJNT $BOU ;O BB RROUXRE ► TO dotet t 'WX` TBE FOLLOWXNG colenTmoss PidOR '3&i. usumicz Off'' auxr* t PEBZ41T8 16. h 'tree, re oval Permit Shall be a►►ebmit fed which sPeaitLes these tees whkc'h are t4i, he removed d i. conneo , ith Cab. eonnatruotis n res ,d remove], pe ...'�e''� � A tree r 1 r�pit ehal�: he appSieedt :for and approved by the Planning DivLai ®rig ,prior tc the removal any sin -site, P STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Bivia oci. such' trees stlop V]$Io!a APPROVAL BBAgX, SE VALID ONLY i}' teHB FINAL • P1 ' T IS t3UbAI D XTH] 1 E/CHTEEN l O! hS or THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DEC±SION o Prepar d By Ron Pomeroy Assistant Planner. eel B : Dis . c* Be " ,• dorff hppr � y � Benio: Planner BBABINGB orPIcBR GBABc \OETRIE SUB 93 000B Date 'Date PAGE 3.3 LEGiBILITY STRIP 'MS 'VILLAGE: CONDOMINIUMS SW 77 h 21 1993 r, Ron Pomaroy Planner—City of Tiger 0125 S.W. " Hall Blvd. Tigard Oregon 972 RE: My application for Subdivision Currently y Entitled Std. and Fir Street west of 72nd Ave. tabor .... . Attached a drawing h a modification we trio like the proposed* Its betweva lots 1 & 2. It Is a. ve + a oor shift from what we Submitted. Nil slz�,. drawing fle ing that small ch ige? If r,o,',..bovar, Many copies. . is m gr change still) meets or exceeds as Ql ode r gUitt nei is Please call ", my questiaai s. Sincerely yours, Pe . iYe i0a Daytime— = 2464977 RX4lt 8T I R. QO 1F Ts DATE1 March ..19 1993 PRO!4 Tigard Planning; Department 8 .1 atp s 93 -00th OFIAS APBTRTP P IPO #5) The applicant requests Subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide a 3.2 acre site into 11 lots ranging in size from 10,027 to 18,528 square feet. APPLIC P.15-VIEW it �9�rel 14 Code Chaptera�` 18.48, 18.88, 'v, , 92, 18.150, 18 160, sand 18 CR;TRRxA Community oilmen 18.102, 18.108, 18. ,164= C Coalprshensive Plan Pelic.;. eeg 2.14, 4.2.1, ,7.1.2* 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. TI"" 13400 SW 76th Avenue, the northwest corner of SW 74th and Cherry Drive and two lots in between (iCT !I 281 IOC, tax lots 3300, 340a, 3600, and 3601) ZONE: R-.3.5 (ReaidOntai, 3.5 units /acre) The R-3.5 zone al.lowe ®iutg1l family dstaCh2d rei idential units, public support facilities, reeidential treatment homes,. farming, manufactured hazes, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, and accessory structures !ng other u0es. Attached Le the Site Plan and applicant ,a statement for your review. P infora ilti jn available t by Various o r staff, a rl report mma�nd rec ndation will be prepared par lPc p e and a ctecision w a,1 be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your =lava ants by Mary + 1993., 8®u ,,.,.ay •= letter t'4 return yofW1�. ci ents. use the mm ce provide(' be�,d;a or attach �y a un ble the a b ve date please phone( the staff contact noted below with M c r c nta and confirm your cos .lilt® in welting .ae avian as � 9 , poaa® le . If you have any questions regaztding this n *;otter,; contact the Tigard Plan di is Department, 13125 8W Hail 5ltd. , Tigard,,. OR 17223. PHONE: 639•»4171. STAFF CONTACT 13 i n Pa y .rte PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING /TEES THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact : __. of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Britten Comments: r .�o.A..w:.i Name of Person Cookeentiue : - ". .'► Phone Number: DiENORANDMI CZTY OW TIGARD, OREGON TO Ron Pomeroy ': Chris Davies, Development Review Inginee : SUB 93-0009 ORASCC /PETRIs April 8, 1993 Desc:ita911 s The a pp licant p ro p oses to divine a p arcel of a Pp roXinatel y 32 acres into 11 lots. 1. Streets; The site is located at the northwest corner of S.W. Cherry Drive and 74th Avenue. Both streets are classified as local streets and have the following minimum standards (all distance azli from centerline of right-of-way): 25 feet of right -of -war, 17 feet of pavement, curb art d sidewalk. S .W. Cherry Drive is fully improved ' along the i`rontage of the development except for sidewalk. Therefore, the appY icant should be required to install a sidewalk along the frontage of S w. Cherry Drive and underground any overhead utilities, S.W. 74th Avenue is an unimproved local street bct +een S.W. Cherry Drive and S.W. Fir Street. There is 20 feet of right -of'-way (each side of centerline) . The applicant is proposing to provide two - thirds street improvements meeting local street standards along with the 5 feet of additional right -of --way along the frontage of the development:. In addition, the applicant should be required to provide a turn - around meeting the requirements of the Tualatin Valley Fie DstrIct, The applicant is proposing a private street, with access to S.W. Cherry Drive to serve six lots The private street meets all the Cherry city standards. It should be noted that we recommend the following changes to the private street, which we feel will make it less of a maintenance burden to all those concerned: A. The / foot strip along the east side of the street that is shown part of Lot 9 should be incorporated uttjn the private streets; B. The 3.50 foot strip along t he west side of the street that is street; and Lot with the 1:.:ivate shown as part of Loa 6 ��hould �►e incorporated LI�'dG`I. S SUS :�3 -O taRASC►U /PFi' `I�.IFa -, NFE�2TY�3'G CC1I!ilMFi■T Pr CO C. The strip of land on Lot 3 which is between the hammerhead and . the adjacent pro perty (Tax l i t 3501) should be incorporated with tha pri,vate street. Lots i and 2 of the rro��'i�►sed subdivision will acces s off the corner of S.W. Fir Street and S . � 76th Avenue '� The streets are fully i3n ro p ve,d except for sidewalks Currently there is an existing single family residence located on this portion of the development and it gains its access from the corner of Fir and 76th. Typically, as development occurs, public improvements are installed to bring sub- '4,andard areas into complianc0,, While we concur that a sidewalk is pert of the existing City standard for a local. street, it is our opinion that with such a limited frontage (i.e. approximately 75 feet), taking out the area fo�: two driveway approaches (approximately 60 feet) , and the fact that the remained of the neighborhood is not likely to have sidewalks i..: the very near a l future, . the requirement ement for the installation of a sidewalk should be waived. Therefore, it should be requited t hat the applicant sign a -remonstrance g the rnaindar does. ere non remonstrance � r�.;ment to instal. sidewalks when ,,� of the neighborhood • Sanitary Sewer: There ice' an existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer line located pp 1 i of proposed development .. The applicant a. roximate.�� 250 feet south o to connect to a extend to newer line to serve this is Proposing . - nde ot�e development. The existing line has the capacity to handle this development. ▪ Storm Drainage: The applicant is proposing to collect the storm water i,,\t various points within the subdivision and direct it Drive. The aexiiti g storm sewer system located in S.W. Cherx,y up f y g capacity y handle e should verify that the existing system has the ca ac�.t to this development The t nifi . d Sewerage Agency has establi:5 has agreed r i 91-47) g. agreed hed ` and the City , g to enforce; (Resolution and Order No. Surface Water °tna t the construction' of on water,', quality Regulations requiring facil3„tieS or fees in- 'lieu of their construction. Section 1 . '�a, of the above noted Resolution and Order cites conditions under: which a fee in -lieu may be accepted, specifically Section 7 10b. states, N' The site is small cocpared to the development plan, and the loss of �� to facility }4oi.� d preclude the of f ect iv area for the ones y p ent It is in-fill r opinion the site the following limiting it is an P has th dewelo m our 2) the minimun lot size of factors �,) situ�tiorts r f ) to install a faci ty would re ire, 'a re wo qu 10 O�Q sq��,.�e .feet and 3 , _ , .. and an inefi scent use of, the•, land, subdivision Therefor we recommend configuration s that a fee 3.n -lieu be tegztiired. TJCII�SE 'RiN c T s SuB 9$ °°09 4 11 Recommendations: ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. 1, Additional right - of-way shall he dedicated to the Public along the S.W. 74th AveF ue frontage to increase the right - of-way to 25 ;Feet from the cent erl..S.h . The description shall be tied to the existing r, i.ght -of -way center) i.nr,; For additional information contact City of Tigard Engineering Department. 2. The applicant shall install.' a sidewalk, underground utilities, and streetlights along the frontage of S.W. Cherry Drive. 3. Standard two-thirds street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete raventent, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along the S . frontage. and Tnl .' 7 nth Avenue. eet Iinpr . �rements shall be �toathe alignment, of existing adjacent standards and shad conform g ements or ^to an alignment' a p p roved by the Engineering improv g pp Department. i Two- third street improvements include standard half-st. "eet plus a driving lane in the other direction, 4 . The applicant shall incorporate the 7 and 3.5 foot strips of land as shown on the preliminary plat adjacent to the private street as part of the private street.' In addition, the parcel of land as shown on lot 3 between the hammerhead and Tag Lot 4 501 shall be incorporated with the private street 5 An a g reement shall be executed by the applicant, on f orm provided by the City, which waives the property oi►ner' s right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement u:sC et formed to install sidewalks along S.O. Fir Street ,,And S.W. 76th Avenue. 6. Two (2) sets of detailee public improsment plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for prelinti.nary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of ap all e prepared b and ; construction cost estimate, p y' a one (1) itemi�� gd co � , ; Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (1'I'TE .� these :plans ate in addition to any drawings , r AP � � , re ire d by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements 7. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989. 8 The applicant shall pay the fees as established d' under the guideline; r ably shy 91 47 Order No . NOTE This iS a two part fee /wh ch is . ai at different times The, first and . of This Unified. Sewerage Agency Resolution part is paid with a -�� associated public improvements which la for �i � ea. .. portion . p , development . . ea szs the impervious area that of the which increases within the public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 93 -09 GRASCo pETRIE • 4 z,. U„ The appiica ot shall der chbtrate : that storm ,drainage runoff can be discharged Into the without , gr;L icaA y' impacting propertis dcwnst ea p 1(Y. Storm, `drainage details shall be Provided as part og the public improvernent Calcnl.atiohs arbd a topographic map',.off the starryk drainage "basic; Service area shall be provided as a suppieannont to the public imj6rovenlent plans. u,,alrulation$, shall be based`, on full development Of the serviceable area The location and , capacity , , t iStinge proposed, and :future' lines shall be ads : eusedA ' x A grading plan shall be submitted Showing the gxis{ i n q and pxopOsed typical :finished floor elOvatianS on lot, lnelddlc elevationSat 4 different ec aners of the floor plan ties to the trop of curb elevations as shown on the improvement plans The appl., cant shall make an appointment for a pre , construction meeting j with the li City rovemgrit d �. nn� but before Starting s��rtii�nt after approval of the pub c � plans g work on the site. The applicant, the applicanw s engineer and contractor approved plans and e.rmits, � g prior to receiving � h.e shall be re sired to attend this meetin . t pp p p 13. Construction of the pro; nosed public improvement and Erg issuance of Building Permits shall not coiimence until aft s _ ginerxing Department has reviewed and approved the publio' i:11Provements Plans, a street opening permit or Construction 'compliance agreements has been eacecutedo e: ecuti.on cf a developer - engineer agreeoterat and payment of all permit fees. 14. Prior to the plat being recorded with Washington County the applicant provide a 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment As an alterncvtive the applicar quay have the plat recorded after the public imps o ements have been accepted by the City of yiga.rd and has posted the appropriate Maintena,;ce Bond. IN .D iITION THk. APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF �., .... ,, r � THE �''O�LCN'I�TG SECTIONS 4�' THE �� , COMMUNITY Y D ;' ELOPI EN CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCIAUSIVE LX T 1. SECTION 18.-160.'i70 Iinprovoment Agreement F 0fore City approval is cei :tif ed onthe final plat, and before appro ed construction plans are , ///.ssued by the City, the Subdivider shall 1. Execute and file an agxeete,ent with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required irnptovementS and 'repairs shall be com, i : ted; and a include in tho „ho agreement provisions ti.at if such work is not complete : within the period, specifle :., the City may completo the work and recove' f the full ;east and expenses from the subdivider. ENG.INEERIFT ' sty$• • BRA 1 t,. • The agreement shall st .puxlate 1. npxovem� nt fees _and de Posits as may be rewired to be.... ,paid any may also' pt'ovide for, the C±C�'►,Struction of the ' ifliprovementii in stag g' and , for the extension of :.time 'under specific o'or diticns therein stated In the contract SECS'4CN l8a-60.180 Bon►, A. As required by Sent;Lon 16.160.170, the subdivide a,1.1 file 'with the agreement a n assurance of performance supported bY one the following: 1, An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution author., 'zed to transact business in the St ate of Oregon; 2 ▪ 4 surety bond executed by a svArety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remaine in force until the suet' company is notified by taae City in writing that ±,t may be terminated; on 3. Cash ▪ The subdivider shall furr*ish to the city Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, certified by a registered cA-vt..l engineer, City g g amount to assist the Cit En fnee� in calculatin the.. mou nt of the performance as,:urance C C. The subdaivider , shal) not cause termination allow 9 az�.on of nor pl �A id guarantee without havin g first secured written author iz ttor from the Ci t . SECTION 18.160.190 Filing and Recording t'thin 60 da y City revieri and approval, the applicant shall. submit the final plat to the Cou 0ty for diignatures of County officials as :. r'quired by ORS Chapter 92. 33 Up,Y n final revording with the County, the appl ioant shall subwit to the City a myi.ar copy of the recorded final plat. 4. SECTION 18.162.080 Final Plat Ap plication 'Sabiktission Requirements Three copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor lidenced to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative, B. and data or narrative shall, be drawn to teae minimum standar '�i�e a.rtition ds�set, ford by 4he Cregon Revs,. sa (ORS P p ss�d �tat�tl. 9 2.0 5) 0 Washington County, and by the City of T .gard. ENGTNEER11!G COMMENTS n .. fiTX )N, 6o 2. 1.0 Centerline Mon' znentatiosc : I onument Box ec iiii ement s Centerline Muni mentatton for all Major Partitions The centerlines of all street and roadway rights -of-rwaY shall be monumn :nt ad as Prescribed' i.n ORS 92, 060 (2) before City acceptance of, street improvements under: the following specifications. a. tZenterline monuments are required to have monument ems, � g ;� y standards set for those b���� canfc�.min to �+�•h standar monuments within the pav0I ment area; and b The tops of all monument boxes shall be set to finished pavement grade. • I t ,�a All utility lines including', but not limited to these required for elect co communication, lighting and cable television sec ra.ces a..4 .d related facilities shall be placed underground, exce Pt for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and, meter cabinets vfnich may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during ccnstruction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,t000 volts or above. ▪ All improvements installed by the subdivider shall be guaranteed as to workamanship and material ftr a period of one folloAng secured b the City. s y t P by it ��,,.. set q, h deposit �: bond in the amount of the value of the improvements' as set by the City Engineer • The Cash or bond shall c jmplyiith the terms and conditio:', of Section 18.160.180. 18.164.1'4 Installation: Prere is to /Perms ,t Fee ]. N' land division improvements, , .noluding sani bary suers, storm sewers, streetO( Sidewalks, curbs light.ng or other requirements shall be Undertaken n exce p t after r the Mans therefor have been epPr oved by the City, p erm it fee paid and permit issued • 18.154.180' Notice to City Required 1 • Work shall not begin irn . shall �� g the city has ba�en notified �.r� until advance.' +NG INE_ tRING, COrM4ENT S : 3U work is.; discontinue d reistAted until the aC =t�y:,f Cettifiatlanec .The land ��� i�ridr�r t � ine � shs sari tt certi,f ittation of a , fog► p .ovi ed by the City, that a,ll inzpi, oltemnentS, 'weitkinandliip and , materials'. are .n accord with current and standard en it e Cin+� and con t:ruction x�io� ;he cat, Iaz,0 tices, and ate. 9f\ high r ad , y aco0ptanoe. of the . � b� y� iox�� s iati rOvements or any io,4:t»or 'hereof for opeVation and, nnaintenancre v l[' APPROVED: Randall R. Woo; ' y s �' � n inert Fir e F EC ' iett VAS "t ' . ' COMPINTS � °x''t r � , 92 ii t 1 H: T. gard Planning Deportment us i '1i1 6.0B.1 09 SRA.S P C (Nk0 #N) The ,app1icent, requerits SU5diviniOn p plat , oval to divide ace a a �°IF T ite n 11 xel.n�ry p pp� 3,, 021 to 18, 5 8 so ,Iota ,ranging in aize► iE�c� ,���, •. ,►� •eras 1,�48� 3�� @i3� , �.�.9►2�, , ehefl iveaz Plan . Develent a ;-ha > 1.c ®► r � �0 �, and �.5 • �5�i4 � �g���.a.1dS, 10.150, �w . � 4.2.1, 7.1.2, , ',.3. . 77.4.4 , 7.601, 8.1.1, and 8.13. , 1►y1tiN h Avenue, the nor thweNt Wir er of 74th hind t o '76th c4`ae 3300, 3400, 3600 ,. 4�nd b01) $� lotto in bettlE3®1Cl Old= a'o5i�. 1I•'JQ�, '� �' The R-J� v a a:�?ne alk'irat�� eingl�i -- 5 ( e/acre) 2A�8� R-3 op h�.c��h'1fiC�.t7�� 3.5 n��.'h �, facilities, �:"��!�.d.'�.�,A, h. 1 units* public sox" oy e, family clay , ' care, home family detached ressi+ds�� �rankacta�rec3 • �► ant h ®, Eaa�imc�. occupational, �araoxaxy �tc���d aZca treory acrLctures a uo g other veee. Attached is the Site ian 4 i pplicantt a state nt for your rev trod iii' anciea et vayc�.�+n�► departments and. o�hex informatirni v i 1 ie by a recommendation d.l1 be pry �fer:�at�.or� a���i1�`a�.e to Our staff, a rte.. by sir. . f vieh end a �+m$,�ion i��.l nay rendered On that p;eo�xoea�A 3.n the :mar fent�ire« to cotement nee rut Ate b 1�� return JI p 9 y On ZI11�.�c r.�ppl�.oat�.or1 we "" � �� . use t space p: ,,ovided below or attach a separate c /att r y"onr c honer the . staff cant ne abav ,,,,a. p �' err ®. use dam re�i vnd � ..... ceten�� �i� writing ,��e Morn 'as rued below with your srnfie axed Gcrn i� �� ., � .r a'i:» X71. question* regarding ,� ®�iilaSle. if yc+� have any � � Tigard, this � �7�2 contuit x t�3�uT1 err : . Planning Departs ent. 13125 .� ► UaU Qilvd , g STAFF CONVICT: _....::.�.. Fonerdr .,.....N --:mod PLEASE MEM. TUE .. ITNNS TWIT PAPPL1T We have reviewed the proposal no objections to :it o ,e ry �o �fa�l �d haYVQ Please co-ntact Of onr office. 'lease refer to the enclosed letter. Written C ,rirmlentg L r' Lemma iviii.rio.impabiLAisonte■e6ssie■eommi Name of M'OO'S= ant.,' .ng: Phone tau caber: -r 1 '993 • • aM orb • A � DA S: March 19 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department (ItiF0 #5) The a plicant requests Subdivision preliminary p1at approval to divide a 3.2 acre site is to 11 lots ranging t+a ze from 10,027 to 18,528 *ware feet. APPLXCABLE h*VXLiir cRxTERZR,s Community ber lop Bent Code Chapter*. 10.48, 18.18, 10 492* 18.102, 18 3.0er 18.150, 18.160 and 18.164.; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2 o4. . '7.3.10 7.4.4, 066„ 1, 8.1.1, and B.1.;3. i : 101;: �• . r :� 1 �s 13400 Sid ' 6th Avenue, the northwest corner Of 5; ' 74th and Cherry Drive and two late: in between (W C114 2s1 IDC, tax Vats 3300x, 3409, 36OOb and 31 101) *ONZa '3. S teaidentAh, 3.5 unite/acre`. The R 3. S zone allottes a lrizglr avA y ddettaahe r reaeidezt .taxi units, public stipport faaSiti tea, residential treatment hares, farm'Lnv, manufactured hotness, family flay' a are, hemp occupations, temporary vac!®, an:L acce®rory 0,. k:rl tlrG e.es hung (Matt uses. Attached is the Site Plan And applicant: s e eitatement fvo your revue •. Fro* as i.anfo oration supplied c'aarious departttants amlM avocado and from otter information available to our staff, a report and recommend4tion will. be prepared the , ro call in the mar future, yo ,ash and a decision e��.gl. be rendered on th P � ti;.o coonent on this application, we need your continents by Mas° , 1993.o Tit*: may sa se the spade a � om,i.�e i belo uw Or a v attach a a` ct a to re turn l ou c o ntct. 1f e u a rotakki ta rea n tW e th e I dter plwase phone staff contact noted below T itb your c� nts and confirm cn �r Writing th aeon tiie tble,► �f you have any questiond regarding thie Matter, contact h Tigard Plaarthing DetpartMent0 13125 SW Sall ilvd. , Tigard, OR 97223. POI : 639- 4171. STOP CONTACT: Ron MASS cWI THE FO :L S ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have revie ed the proposal and objject ioLna to it. � h saes no l000Knomensiom Pleatc., of our office. Please re er to the enclosed letter. Written Comments:: nts:: w4::U11r1F�+fYentlfi'reM - -_. ...e.+e.iiveeou r, .... .... -., .. .._........., f.... - -- 11p,�.. ._ .. wea.esiuV:.raea�iwa:An.. ...., rw�.•, w .mrAwtier.s.rer.ewiYJ�el.e.�.waW .. - 1■•■•■,, 3.a11wo.em•■.■■r►r+..f . .,��:..� iii oft >�eg�n denting � Phone itiliabers a ,,. __n '!"r • 3 y , littedAdttOisfratiort 13137 :8',1 f is F gtt y O go ' 97223 62G -1620 Fax (503) 68422298 City (( ; Tigard Ron llomero. /Pla.n r, rr BOX 233,97 'x d: OR 97223 In •res ponsre to your teal e t,- fo�3, cct 3 r tints,. on° � • ,�lai�n►iYie�.t P;ark (SU �i O lfg9), for,fated .east. of 74th • aiwd sonOt.. of r thO' attached i6. .istateni aat a to Bud Hillman Director of Operations • d rM 0�R lr Development Number of faits T[.URR0 -TLUFLOTIN SEHOOL IXSTRIC �r 2 J .UT`Y tOUNTV RESWEN- FIRE..' IMPRLT STATEMENT Cherry Pars! Single - Family Mu ti -Fatally ily' Date 3130193 11 0 Elementary Fhil` Lewis- 'Bernentaty Entermed® to (Fowler Mid., Sch_) 1h School (Tigard: Sr High);. 4` r51 X61 School Design; Capacity 500 Actual Enrollment Current Available Capacity Impact of Impact of Prior Approved this Developments Development. Adjusted 'school �uiremer;t Capes i (Sum of columns Z,4 l5); 444 ` 411 89 29. 4 900 785 1X1' 5- 8 -a 867 1��5 1 w�3 ; nag 78 � . 1 1642 For explanation of columns 1 through 5, see [mpa� statement bode (enpiosea). Status: of School Impact School(s) capaci4 not exceeded (column 6 less than column 1). School(s) capacit y exceeded - -core facilities are sufficient to consider portable additions Sufficiency determined by requirements of Uniform Building Code andlcr City County codes. School(s): caacitty exceeded- -core facilities insufficient to consider portable additions. Additional . capacity may be provided by other options under consideration. by the School: District v oich° include: grade level reconfigurat en_ rescheduled school year, boundary adjustments, douZ4a shifting, busing to unde7=444ilized facilities', future bond measures leading to new constm Lion, and other housing options.• T Q. he4;;; c,-711 and statements have been prepared by Tigard-Tualatin Senaol District Administration S€ -afar amt zz.- _ . i by the Board of Directors. This school impact statement: is for the above indi ;aced develop!=_ and is valid for 120 days. Bud Hinman. Dir c r of Operations (684 -2221) �S C_ LEGIBILITY STRIP IMPACT STATEMENT CODE. Column 1 School: capacity reflects the number of classrooms, portables on site, and Special Education pro earn acenmodatiofls at an individual school.. Column 2 Actua► current school enrollment - kindergarten has been computed at one -half. Column 3 Current available capacity- difference of column 4 and column 2. Column 4 Impact of previously approved developments c of rmined by School. District housin (see School District: Housing Formula shown below) Column' S Impact of requested` development Determined` by School Dietrict housing formula. Column 6 Adjusted School- capacity r uirement, determined by the sum of cc umns 2,4 and 5 and places developmental request in A, B or C category: SCHOOL DISTRICT HOUSI FORMULA_ _ Singl=e. P gly Dwelling SCHOOL DESIGN` CAPACITY. omen- en- NROLLM°E'NiT AS OF 3/5/93 1553 949 795 713 755 495. . 5.57 399 559 497 411 595 560 604 9552 0:.: 3J,l_: 0.13; 0.0 0.57 PTA - firsts grade- children per. dwelling: Elementary' students per dwelling Intermediate students per dwelling High school students per dwelling Total school age students per dwelling Tigard High School Tualatin High School Fowler Middle School azelbrook Middle Sch Twality Middle School AFT Bern. WO .card Elem. D irham: Elena.. Templeton. Elern Metzger Elem. Phil Lewis g: -p Earn...: Byrom Elem. Tualatin, Bert., Bridgeport Elem TOTAL, Multiple amil DWellrrr� s G.08, Elementary students per dwelling 0.03 Intermediate students per. dwelling n 02 High. school students per telling 0.:13 Total: school' age; students per dwelling 1.455 1465 900 800 90 0: 570 500; 425 550 550, 500 600 600 600 10525 TO: 19 Marcy ' 3 �.. ��... Del.: s �� � PAM% Tigard Pleiritig Department RR: s ,14,1 B 3-000 oVA a1E (NPO #5) ��ehi applicant requests &1. ,• viaio t ;$ e1i* inary *IAA approval '� into 11 ranging in sire fro : ©t 027 to 18,E 528 agnate e a . .�PPLttAM RiVXE' SL8 c 1i5�4 role. 40, .8 t 5, 1D. P2, ., 1a�3.e�p�nt �"�� C1aa�,iti�rlQ' 15. �: � �81�171;�J` aI�1�R1A. _ �y y 1�.1O2, 18 m 10 i 1a. i 0 1� G �c mp �1,� hei�yy� ! "i� 1.a a jpooylicit e � t13�.15t�, ,Zg �,fi4'�,ai�1'+� f � �� ��.amid fY..R�r311, JI%Q�iieYi'�.9�i7JL7o 261. ;� 1� 2. , 7..2, , 1.3.1, 7.4.4, 706010, 8. , 1� ... 'er eaniw' i't and r �p �llrth and t�1ieli:`ry Dr 3601) t loth tt )30,twe n , tax le of $ � 1� 16th r'�i ®®tPl�►ii� `,��� a�:S�. Z�� '�i� �.�►�,IA1�330 p ����:�o_ . ear X 3.5 (Reidas r►tai, 3.5 Width acre) zee 114. C ,zeWn0 kt1 .�� asixeg amLXy 4otach „ re®identia . unite P 1 ' isuppOist fac lit as, rttidentia1' trent. nt hom C, farming, MahtifaCtured home , fatally days care, s cacewpatiLotnr, tempor :thee, and &cccc eo 'tetrnoturea among other dada. Rtthd+d fh 'MO Site 'Plan 1ioant' a state' nt fort . r r0444#0,,,, ' e formati eupp by vatrfou Uddepau nts and enci€t 1 and ft a i ether and a� fOitmetidR available a to our staff, A report ax recteettiOndatioh .�. . Will prepared aKad it inion will be rendered Oh t �� � rapsea�°n the hear f*t If %ich to mt this dl e � �•�r cr�ne nt® by Mar: 29, 1'93. yet may u se ts P . e provided below or atta ch a aep rate lv ter to retu n yet c ni to - --� — anf �. please phone the staff ►n ta at ltdt� b�y,Ww h our r rIc® aa eof 3ra y caar c a �r�t%�s S a� moon a Xf h hetV any q eatiot s reg ding th � tte y contact th® Tigard PlaWaing DtrtQlarit, 13' 23 sw RaSI Blvd., t3oeyda OR 91223. PROMO: 633.:.k71 + STAFF t ON ACT: Ben PLIARSt VaRCK TWA PoLto XNG TTEMs TOT 2%IPPL!: We have revieWed the propoeal and have no obie ctLitb to Lt, . . of oor ere. ®ff�. Plea ®e rs fer do the enc],oe• lettetto Oit tten Grata y wean. iminosawmizawssoiirmi■rsser a,.si:�eiC 2�ird:rw� ?:s'+ h+rwerr .. w�vsl�ri+auii Yal�ora�+s .. _ .. perecn $:QI >ti 111hone Nt ' 3er® Y b I ,I d hn A La Tigard ;1anning Department a ry L$I . .-0P1 L ymOgti t (I PO #5) rte ,a0LaUctiOt i*teeata Peltd1.74$101I 70404eibery plat ,ppscowa1 to 4014110,.'64,,, ;49'10052e d a acre nits anto .n Size o]i; 027 1 APPL 0.: � rat' m Lott D.v.1o0 19.92, 1( .102, 18.108, 18.140* 18.160, 01164 16.1164; enaiLv a a vn Pliaiea 21.1, 4. f .1, 71.2, 7.31, 7 and ' TX0N: �. .. / r ....� •r` r` .. . .. 1.346ib,, SW `j�th �''��3neiW, "he no7C'��tltilQ! ®t tW"`•j'�dQ3lr °,�� �i '�4tba and :her DaC two 1 +�t�, in bete ga (W Th 251 11 0; tar • Xota 331 0* 3400, 2600, and '•3601) • ZONIEt CRQ141dOntal, 2.5 un411/was ' the '104.6 $ors a ,l,aaa 04p116- , •to 1.y diatfOidd re ®idential ita, $ � w ort reaic nti.al ireetteeet . r� Ar - L�l�1'�tE ! aC�a�l9�o ��et k� e�ay C�°N'J�p h s�►COU tS.��'�ht'�m•3` f�s��t, wt�ir�a;�aetwed h ®, � r . . .. ,. N r n40es. et�es nQ Attached M ,te Platt and is pllicau t• to ,tat. ,+ant for yc ur rw . • £ f gran airl �6m1 ass 11,0d by ®eriaant departmental and au3ielpt froao► other imfo amidaen avt ,?laahke to but staff, repo " .. d - 1 be rendered ern the ,nand n ar future+ If lath. � ;.�.� , �,oa a►� '� � �►i11 s�paretad to dui on this lication, we need r cemeeita r La 29, p rce u the idcd be ow Or attac a somata lette to rebate ye away tes ete a e n " tt - ae . dai1a pleat. phoftei ti* etas± contaOt y' ' c w>.to ' in itk. as soon At u . aitib . a• It ,you uhf a" ; oattiione regarding this . matter,, conta0t thee,, Tigar+i Planning VVecart stet, 13125 Nall, T 0 23«� P�yH�+0 m 1`i ., SW Y7��il , �lve� u , �� , OR r'7�22+r1 L J�daQ� a ��i7/ `� alrA `r OLI1 `AOrT5 PLEASE ' M TE3 FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APNA : We have reviewed the proposal an have no objections to it a;ral @�.esk3 contact �..•...�.;...�:r;i+.. ®•a �� i--�. _�. ox cur ,°)iUice. Please refer to thq enclosed letter. written Comments offiumrwsa,v doirmeist. eftwioriwormonteraWamosmarw ttwwsmr+ai ®r tmar,�nw . ,.. .'. _.. •. �..� .: r11w■■■•■.WAY1111 vrerra■.+r ••� .�Am�r.�;�wi Yr+i+n idw�i rrrus rrrwieali■■+,vnrr.sm.rmw .i ,�rrrwisw�,uavaii.w � - : . .• , ' ,sn is urn.. vs.rur, rrmoonrarlarrinuma Y51 nw..asnermeson.+e:uins..l rur room.•lnw,o+ tame of Person aatimg . ?honk � . -- -� ,.L w a _'�"� , �--► Adt i'si�.aoeoi► �Qxi$$T ctrsIgT OATH:JM ►a ch 19, '3 ' x. �3 mating, 0apnt • s TEL F'].al._ : :r.ae1 �3:.0®0L Ri sG�}'l T�t3 ? (1NPo #50 'Thn ai p1. =wit z� nent9 i.aiti..'.,.....`"...." to divide ae mare nsLta; ntO :11 pr�liaaina�,� plat approval lots raag'iag in size Erne 10,027 to i,8, 528 ®q*j.a r ., ". 0RATT8P1At c nity . 0ev►el nt e' Cha Mere 18.480 18.920' 18.102, 18. 108, 16.150, 18.16Q, *ad 38.164 i pteheneivip Flan E�o�.fo .ee 2. 1, d42'41, 7a1.2, b3� , .I,� «4, 7.6 4,, 8.1..34. and, 8.i. . �X0N the ear of , 074th �4 d yu n fa© d e iortht ooa'n 13� Dq � �6t�t Attila*. 1 e 2s1 , tax Leta ;300e- , '°� two ]. ctey3 3 identa1, ' 3. S. , U "Lt8/acre The R--1,. 5 zone a loots 1a-b Zia lE� t fatally detached renidertiai a ?ort facilf tioe, reaident al treatment farMitagi, nuf.actu aid hous e p family day Care, hada occugatier:4i tempoteary ueet , and acce®aaOry strUctUred amxang other mass. Attache is the Site plan anti 'applidatatin at&teuaenta for your ree3�w.. nos v i .. . �.e,' her or atdation Will be of infoxn�tio �. � r ... near 3:ah�cra�at�. ®i� a�vafla{�1e tv caie ®ta�i�f o a. repot and res.- m et�pphied by vas; oue c�e;�asrt�nt,a and g ttc��a r Q �,re rasa exed en the proposal L the near fut ; �e. r�If yr u with and 'a dediiiiesiii �y,•� q. p ... {,1.y �q � �y = /��p -_f� need _ your. /� �,•�. yam, Ay,. /� o Cc ntent or. thin a ✓/ eSt.1. .Ii , p� oMM odumentis by L « ue9 the span° paw ed below nor attach a Separate latter to return your a nt ►a . � cl�nte� w�,'rtish$aaa �roc�aaact stoted beloara With our comments h and on P phone' t ago rry q a oaaaoread this matter, ciatratt the 1'ilg p��e�r�1+e� of you have any ��' g g D E�l�►ui. ,, Tigard, Olt 3 223 a yi0 x Fa39,� .41 1, R�.aan3•ai Il��t�►rletltex�t 13125 i%fi �a11. STMP CONTACT: t^a 9man' „,,.„ ..._:____ .,' PLUSH CHB= THE POiC II.MINN :CMS S TH T APPLY: We have reviewed the 9ropoea1 acid have tto objecttiofe to Please contact of O1 r office. PleaOo' rofer to the enclosed letter . •Y6 tt Ven Comments: art. Pet a loirmialsiifflortamorawermasootssi Yarsrrsi, - - - rwr..ra....err rJ�s.a .. ... I � �, wry .m.,�yre.r.c�I.ai::lr.u.rre�r .....• . ' . . , , riwxo .nsib�sn++saMiesrvwviwiuY.w.+ mamt t f Peraofi �'1 ntinsa Phone Number: w .,r F M* .Tigard .Planning Department . 5 They Itrgi a .iC t X' ueats ©g PETS (NP® i Subdivi,aiton preliminary plat approval to divide a 3.2 acre site into 11 lots ran ding in else from 10,027 to 18, 528 squares l e appLicawat V8W o wri t ty ve1 Chapters 18 � 48, 8.038, 18.92, 8. qQ henaiv plats pokes � � � �„(if,�, 18.150, iii i � ®, �iD i ��� � 'M'�°��e �_ ,� . yl�►yym u1a , 2 .. 7 y+ �1 8.1.1, 8 �1.i X11 dGXle�.)� �A��n / 7•���� 7��.;►����� ���� /.6�d.® , and GIIs4Y���r '- �'���.y,��.wv�.' -. 3 3400 SW 7 �`.h Avenue, the northwest corner of 5W /4th and two lots ' in between (WIN 281 100, " tax lots 3300, 340. 0, 3600, , n 360 1) $¢iEs I-3.5 (Ieaidental, 3.5 units /acre) The R -3.5 tons allow aviitgY ,- family detached residential unite , support t.taeL ititz. , . nee; ae� ti s 1 treatment homes, �a�m�n�� ranuf aa : \ -� • E family ¢ccxtnne, trait e�les,and accessory s buctU ee among Other **sea. Attached 9l is the bite Plan am applicant's for your�review. 'rom ,. a lA.eant ® et�,�Ceael� other �►xs�ie�xe d � recommendation �r information pip taff.,, a report a n in the endationure x " wish lied by �.nf+aat�t�»om �1�►af�.alb►le to our n proposal i ry qe�� y - , ' . will �' *b� r ��'r �� ' the : P�1: �t� �a�' ,bs,w ,{,��i a"ou a� a declaim* ��1i � ��.���'"sd .: .. on this appiicat���a, we need your a by toe Comment provided below or :Ltaoh a s parate letter to eturn your, o 'ate the e _ _ the 'staff e;on4;�au u�an b .. _. „ me -,ta� e��af3,�.r�yraou�' �'s_tii.b' ��.�tfa�c� an soon Iba e aboo_ T ate le�ae one t f .. are unable to .r ®e . � nd b the . e�ee�d below with youz. e� -. 'regarding contact the . Tik�ei:d' if i►, 13 25 SW Sall BI.vd. 0 Tigard, 1011 97223. �'PHO : 4v39= 4173.' n �anriiiag Department, S Taff CONtAdt S MUSS CORM LT. 11 G ITEMS THhT,APPTift. We have reii.ed the prepo cal and 40V6 no ObjeCtiOria to it Pleabe dOn adt' of our of ;Lca Please ,refer to the endloae d getter. Wrft tan dente t - - , w Gr.�` • JPct: ve5>:�� C'rxi -�►, cYvk '�'': �......r.. \rum 67 (; l' YO u l I 'tJ1� C:�'� 1 CQC r ►' a:,.:....M:..: ..,r.... -r-.. maimier _ Pereon C neenti.ngs _,.. - ..�.r. '� Ph ore r® ode O.w 1• • sarelia 1 99 FROM Tigard P1aening Department r 15) The a �icnnt, x ® queat� diiision is plat apPvoiral to divido a 3.2 aca a site into 11 3 t ritiniing in eizee from 10,027 to A8, S28 Square feet, APPZICA.01.2 . eve`al aaa�► Code Chapters 10.48, 18,�.a6,, 16.92, 13 p o A rand 8.1.3. � � ies an:i�it i ��.1�2r �'2.1 ®6�g�2, 7.� 1�.XCrP�, end �i8.164� its: .ar. v .i" 76th AvenUe, the northwest corner oof W 74th l k and 400�i i 7 � o � Cherry Drive 1 I, ' 13 ` nn +4e scree The R-. .5 zone allows si',ngl two Lots d betw .On (W ! 281 1DC, to lots 3300, 3 00, 3600, and 36 1) f ly .,&,tached residential units;, support facilities, residential �lic su treatment home, farming, manu actura( homes, £am iy day care, hobs odcu,'eations3, temporary ueesn, and accettsiarV structures among other' uses Attached is the Site Plan and applicantue ;utetament for -ycr4r review, Orcm asp . a�gencicis and from other infOrmation supplied h]!° ia►ar�.cusa departments � aceec�*�dai��,am a�il�. be p�;�pared information av�:�il�sbl® to our srQ¢.�Kt�f, a r�e�rt� in the near future. ; If �u Wish . will be rendered On the prO yeti ish_ and a de3ci+e�.e��t � .. �. � 1993. to .. cyst_ can ,th?Ls��� a�i� a�io�� we attach your eeu$cmamen�t by �_�_.. �� caaafctas.� use the rpaces r ►,�.d leas phone the staff contact � ,, . cu: aim; ►; %, ae tnd Jk�w the ova date s �p ur tents and COn£irsa your cone, to , .n Writir4 as soon as toted sib . f rtt �, N ,r gUestiens regarding this matter, . co &act theT r .._ liDi�l�.e3 r ... �£ �� ��: \� � any ,d. Bali . � 639..4111. � ...- _.. Ti garde OR 97223. °'��� .. the 7Ci ark W Bali DlI., T g lr �epaar�nent, .��312� S STAPP , NT tam Fc�noiexd '+� �,, PEE CUM THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPIai' We have reviewed the piece a l l and, have /716 s objecticrm to it. moompormieemer � please contact :..� .� �,d;:_...,�...b_.' of our cl£ ice.. Please refer to the encl® tied ]utter,, AA LJ w _ C7 0e 'off 44101 itz sz-G isIvu?' r'.1► _�Ta +4,4., ►tee .,cam �� � t _ Iti am Rye of Person Commenting 6.1 P- hone wan bier V • • 1 . ..... ......ire -rte r ! YI • .r N;± Mars �a y a MX: Tigard Planning Department Pigs li The : ►1Lc a sort re9ue a� s..�... , -- 7 approval to divide a 3.2 acme site iseta 1 lot ranging in .n Lae a % 10,027 to 16, 528 ssnoi►a re feet. APPLIChSI3 szvataw MITRIttlis nni,ty Development Code Chapters 18.48 e .3 88,E 181..2, 18.102, 1.81. 108, 18.150, 1 prehe Lei ve Plan 1R�s 1LO .as � �1�4� � 2:►1,1. 4.2.1, ' .1.2, 7.3.1, 7' 4 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. 1 e 13400 SVO 716th AVellalater th , northwest t comer of SW 74th and Cheri, ' Drive and two lots in between (worn 281 10C ® . 1 ots 3300, 3400, 400, 3600, and 3601) ZO s R-3.5 i����tt�, 3.5 unit `LCZ» ) The R • 5 one allows itigie- ,earsikir detached residential units, public support facilities, ti es , re .,r i ..ent .a1, c nt he s, i homes, family day care, ham ooup s s, and ime,riessolqi tmatures Ong iar uses. l a3iA 15. gat 10 Attache and at ppili s .2d sat ° sites to nt for your review. Pry amt;: -n tup• l d kg, various departments and agencies and IrpAta othaV informatiru . va i1 1.e to our staff, a reper�C and r endat on will prepared e rendered on the proposal LEI the near ut e s If yes wish to and a cement i.n�a will k our u nits by Bqr#, 2, 1.903. `Yeu s gy Ce provide -dt low Or attaa need your t nts . on this application, �r separate 1 ���ttas�r �r�e reta�tn �t use the e ts� reu nd the `a a �c ,, Vi, , pleaaae phone thtr of f donta et ��p r �lyd�_ o»�Ai�b�.� .. "�`"_ "_ -,.� . 4E/i writing A''v �� ®�� �� y questions regarding this matter, contact e f• �1. r with your Comments and °s .e.tn> i.rn d e►t inn w ` t the Tigard Leo ®s�ilra..�s�s. If you have any Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigotrdo OR 97223. MOO 639-4171. ST' CT t � ro o�. gyp �. P� A Na4 �u ., , ?± have reviewed the pro ai and have no ob jeet.ions to it. Please contact _YwWaTOY� .... of our offIcicl. ac— t— w Plea = e refer to the enncl.osed. letter. Written Comments: ,,ssrevs ri...,ms■.am..os r... werarameartornsw Hsu. ,Iwr...rww...�.oro.ew+..nwwi... • ..ir .� "_' ► 1806 of Pole 603iment Luc Phone Nun ber' : zj PROPOShL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SUB `73 FILE TYTLE s 6 r Asco ,1 &t�, i e. t! APPLICANT! 6 �..�i` T' e t"' 2,C , Sc 'ryr :n r (R,a fre c swei q703 5 AGENT: OWN'R 9 11 r� s� _CAJ ves,-r tints 103e,c . Sc.*.) c .)i ir-y 0041 D r, ts 3. 3 (5.00 3 60 /,` yo,.,, >,J41 .4- PAY /11S e 131/oo S"��,i , r St, . REQUEST: Pp1 tcc*,- 1-egtA!-Tts c�tc� ?4-:i` at r`( ?la t" /iv 5'r 4e /o 627 In 81 5 -,ee 18,88) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA3 18: q S 418, q t 1 ? /c) . 1e. iory, I . tsco t 6. 166) (ZS ,16 1( ` Covmp. et -R. It'd, t es a r 1 , J J 7, �+ 7 3 1 7 4 C � LOCATION: ' 3' -coca se-t.) 'el „ ht A., (..se) -r /U ,r -, - c >rN r- ' s 71 4:r d c -A e e t Dr r ANicl y`w t, / (bt /0 o. izoo ,/7.) ZONE: 33,:s0134101 J 1 rtAct X64 1 ■em-ticki 3 s- its NPO NO: NPO CHAIRPERSON: c--rer,5 flo 4 4,i AS PHONE ER q _ g.-3 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: .... STAFF DECISION MO1 E1NTS UU„_ DACY: TO STAFF ON h � l PLANNING COMM/SS/0E DATE of HEARING: 2:-J.L:agato HE ARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TINS s CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: P r-/ r •i), 1 � �IOI LENTS AND ATTACHMENTS: ��r��°s � R COMMENTS MAP NARRATIVE SITE PLAN STAFF CONTACT a j �•d t i ,( � CITY OF IIGAR.D, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639 -4171 0 1, GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION /3'," -� s r' 7� ✓vim c-' CI TAX VIAP AND TAX LOT NO 7-4-33d9 34®® 3 0S `'3‘ SITE SIZE 3 . FOR STAFF USE WILY CASE N0. �. ago OiI'1.�E. CASE NO ° s a Al 01- RECEIPT NO. 7 .�.`�_�.... _ ,PPLICATION ACCEPTED R'it o VW- DATE: 'A"' "" Itl Application elemet.ts submitted: �✓" (A) Application form (1) 1„/'f b) Owner's signature - asithOggeffrOU C) Title transfer instrument (1) PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* a 0,0 S/ ca 60,4 4t rah.., 71 -3300i 30c, tf-3 ‘o,' / Cy�/M r,r y'p4//8 t' ..5 Yov sw94t s PHONE 6a iv ZIP 3._ ADDRESS l CITY y7' APPLICANT* G�-j ADDRESS e e Yet) c ZIP When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record F authorization or a .hesowner pr of the owner with written from a.he � aut jr nation. The owner(s) must sign this �q icm .. the space provided , with this a two or submit a written authorization nw on page pplicatien. submit ,,//(D) Assessor's map (1) V(E) Preliminary wary Plat (pre-app checklist) Applicant's statement (pre-app checklist) aim (1) 2. PROPOSAL SAY The owners of record of the subject property request perr Ision to divide a Ttal Aret7 parcel into lots between ,.,_, (number of lots �2 ./ and . !. 145;Z, . square feet in size if) Filing fee (6415 plus per lot) DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: COMP. PLAN/ZONE DE GNATION Lfr to 6 gel , e. N.P.O. Number. y......S Preliminary Platt Approval Date Final Approval Date Planning Engineering ,; . " List any variance, Phoned Development, sensitive Lando, or other land us6 actions to be considered as pact of this applicati " ; /Va ate.; Applicantst To have a complete application you ail need tt, submit attachments � !bait this described in the attached information . heat at the time you s pig .. TAR APPL T( »o) SHALL 'CERTIFY ..THAT: A. 'fie'. a�oae �� nest c ®e met d of to uxN � deet cst�r3ctio�s teat ma ,wmwNwm..w� w+.....wowr■i re°.+r'°'°"""m.^ in.rrw.amr. raw'. vi .r. —' °L. �.: s- •- --�-+M attached to R� or RE ,&K4 Its itSI &'��`MR1, r zed �u o�x t rrtrnw m-r ■�s n'�'". L if the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted w the terms and sash ject to all the conditions and rented �,� �acca;���aence with limitations of thtt approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan„ at,t chments and e* 4bita traSamitted herewith, are true; ue; and the applicants so av,h + ssoed, based on this Pp , �-aowled�e that an 4 permit �, are p that unr` such _ �c�.tQo$�e y be revoked if it is found false. d The applicant has read-the entire contents of the application, incLudIng r i approving the policies and criteria, and �andex�stand� the requirements for aPP ( L:pr /b52OP) S• f 1 411 �1 ' l' r v { 1 ,r�r � � 1� ,� � h '� .�. mil» } ` � , r wl ---J {W rN'tuamiwV.�+.r+wrwe Ntk"�"*'•"n"�wwwla r;wnrrrr+ ` t U D 11311 r I PiMOtihrt" ��' �.I. / iew 0 i� 1�.;_'.CCt_. h.S .•.� •x<��ti 1� y;t . March . 4,19 JP d " Tho City at Tigard Manta Dept ent 13125 S* Hail Md Tigani O on 07223 MOM: : C'' o Invetineals Greetings, Graft° htivestments is , t Oregon Partnership and is the deed holder of Tax Lot 3400, Washington County gesse S, 1W . (dam aerie) at d +fan admowl u and consent to Craig A. Petrie submitting a subdivision applieatIon to the City of Ttigud Planning Departmed which includes out tat lot. 233 S.S. WASHINGTON ST( l`ET HILLSBORO. OREGON 9712* PHONE (503) 648 -4061 FAX (503) 381,4648 DATE: March 5, 1993 NAME OF PROJECT: Cherry Park REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for 11 Lot Sin 9e- Family Residential Subdivision APPLICANT: Craig Petrie 18262 S.W. Bryant Road Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 (503) 246-7977 PROPERTY OWNERS: Tax Lot 3300, 3600, and 3601 Raymond and Phyllis Ems Tax Lot 3400 Grasco Investments {GAL DESCRIPTION: Tax ots 3300, 3400, 3600 and 3601, Map 2S1 .10C City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon SIZE: 3.2 Acres LOCATION: Northwest corner of S.W. Cherry Street and S.W. 74th Avenue. ZONING: R -3.5 INTRODUCTION This application is a request to subdivide 15 acres to 11 single - family residential Tots: All the lots q g x ,y private '' Al hammerhead in order aro t 4 000 square feet or larger and will be served by a rrv�ate teat with a ham e turnaround, :I the lots meet minimum to provide fire department and other emergency �andvsetblaclt`�. No variance are e e ue�� d with this requirements of the City for lot size, area q. application. The private street will access off of Cherry Street and consist of a paved q ry p surface 24 feot . in width between curbs and a sidewalk on the east side of the street next to the curb. Three or the side , enue This portion of street will be fully improved > ... � � ' li int �roVed With half Lots access f►'orn the west sloe of 74th Avenue, street improvements on the west side and an add tional 7 feet of pavement on the other side for a total of 24 feet of paved surface„ All utilities will be extended along 74th Avenue. tro (6e) All utilities and public se service the demonstrate that a. Preliminary street services are available to eery � property. grades, utility profiles, and grading plans are provided to demo at the site can be developed without impacts on surrounding properties and with negligible impact on the existing site Trees to be removed and retained are also shown. j property requires lot size of 10,000 square feet, and The subject is zoned 9� -3.5 which re wires a minimum ' 65 feet lot width. The front and street side yard setbacks are 20 feet, interior side yard setbacks are 5 feet and rear yard setbacks are 15 feet. Maximum height is 30 feet SECTION 18.160.010 m PURPOSE OF THE LAND DIVISION ORDINANCa; in compliance with the Land Division Ordinance, this application meets its intent and purpose by promoting development at 3.5 units per acre in accta,rdnce with the Comprehensive Plan. The project is infiIl of an area overlooked when the original Rolling F' lis No 2 plat was recorded on public , adjacent property to the south and west. This development was built without benefit of ry approximately f e of 74th Avenue when Cherry sewers. Sanitary sewers will be extended a roxirriatel 300 set wept Park is developed to allow for further extension of the sanitary sewer to service existing properties in the area This project fits in with existing development in paltern area and provides and efficient maximum development minimum i. , i preparation � with the use of scarce urban land with ana�cimurn develo mint and mini nui n lot sizes n compliance w R -3.5 gone. All public health and safety factors have been considered in the preparation of this subdivision. S.W. Cherry Drive has direct access to 72nd Avenue and Fir Street to the North. Therefore, adequate transporta�tio! services are available in the area Because of the low density of this development, adequate ligist and air are available to this project and overcrowding is not proposed, However, maaximurra utilization of the site with rninir ium 10,000 square foot lots encourages energy conservation. All these factors demonstrate compliance with the intent and purpose of the Land Division Ordinance and Section 13160.010, SECTION 18160.060 d PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL STANDARDS The 'following are the approval criteria for preliminary plats: 1. The ;'proposed preliminary plat; complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the applicable zon►rig ordinance and other applicable ordinances and regulations. 2. The proposed plat is name is not duplicated and otherwise satisfies the provisions of ORS Chapter 92 3. The streets and roads are laid ous so as to conform to the plats i... " maps lots of subdivisions and of major partitions eirestdy approved .for adjoining t to and in all r , adjoining property ,9s o general direction other respects w less the City determines it is in the public interest to modify the street or road pattern. An explanation has been ±provided for all common improvements. eee COMMENT: application compiles with the Tigard Zoning Ordinance and therefore, complies r' with the'srl City's This ��pp p Comprehensive Plan. The subdivision name is not duplicative of other subdivisions n The Washington County. The streets are laid out to be compatible id®vua�k on existing ore side and a private storm .`drainage street will be fully improved with curbs and ty system. The private road and storm sewer facilities will be rnaintained in o s d e ectl�� proper 6th owners ...At' Lots 3 through 8 in common: The owner of Lots t and 2 will a c Avenue and Fir Street. The existing ~souse on Lot 1 will remain. SECTION 18150.030 0 . - ISSUANCE OF TREE REMOVAL PERMITS CRITERIA FOR I�� Approximately 55 trees 6 inches in diameter and larger exist on the subject property. Twenty-fouk Approf a trees are to be removed for ' streets, utilities and houses, A few additionG�,1 ���) of then proposed ,� oped. The trees trees may be removed based upon individual house plans when the lots are eves ed to be removed are the minimum necessary to allow for full development of the subject be minimum The trees proposed ta:, be removed are not necessary property with single-family as re �i windbreak or to provide a desirable balance between shade and open wit spaprotect nearby trees as a ° � � not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal ce. The aesthetic character of the area will no Y because of the sparse number of trees already existing on the property.` will be planted on the lots to make up for the trees removed as individual houses Additional trees p additional ucted. Often the homeowners plant 5 to 6 trees on each lot. These not needs will are constructed. Y removed. Existing trees do provide aesthetic value and easily land, and tree removal erosion, retention, p aal will not effect uses on ` soil ret� stability retained due to topography dflw of aCe waters. A complete analysis of all the trees will occur prior to stability of earth and development p ment of the site to insure that all damaged or diseased trees are removed. SECTION 18.88 o SOLAR STANDARDS Only three of the lots have a solar orientation. Two lots qualify for the 20 percent standard . _. exemption and six lots qualify for road alignment adjustrllerit: Because of the ey isting street pattern 74th Avenue and the need to provide a north /south private street to service the interior of the the lots in an east/west direction rather than north /south with of 7 necessary to orient th this a density increase solar orientation. Any modification to this plan would cause a reduction in dense and I s hear oil s other_ n by least five percent 74th Avenue must be extended in a northerly the cost of road constru�tla Y . , � , Which .. - elira�inater more ,` ion. The �rivate street cannot be altered without losing lots or creatin Quid substantially Lot 9 direction. The road could be stubbed out aeon the south side of Lb 9, increased would `xel feet for Solar in exchange for making Lot 7 a solar lot. The depth of Lot 1 could :g orientation n but Alter Lot 8 or i 0 would be eliminated, In any event no modifications to this plan can occur to create additional solar lots without reducing density and increasing construction costs by over five percent. - ^..S3t1 tR:iZ va. alwf ww... . -g... �. •_`__ 3 42 Si SIG REQUIREMENT -i••1i, : r `L- JMEatQ%4- "LOTS t•f - a ` N SOLAR BLDG ..♦fH•. 6•N tan-toss ?. =.:t LINE LOTS a Ni.•• ORIENT .: s •i 1•.NNNNN{•NN.Y .• a'. r i R NfN • i VNtNi+- ... ExEMmPT LOTsp.............e..s..... ••...NKN••s•Nf! .............. : _ ' iNiNGl •Nit•f•.,«• •••••••• ••i/NIi •Nf•• - `t. •• ••NN iiNNL n�G••• N•i•tNN•N •Y••N•N•i••tNNiN.i•••i••ti•/iNNNi1•NN 'EXIST .. _ ; ' as NNtIN• NNiiN••G• ••••iNi /Y•••••••••••••••••••50•600•Mi••t•i•- '.:'- 110NNN•NNtiK 9 • %L H• i• • 'f `N s .: ` . -- NNNN•N CM••••• ems.. ipit]N•aa�j�wa.iNNNN _ ` ,. .ew._ o_. i••• w IMMO •,` ,>,••■•• oa .tcman -.• %' _ .. - -•.•• ^ MIL and IMMIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIMIIIIIR '1.... ...:e. Pi' t •I..N uiNK.N• NNI N N ••f•N••• NH/. PH • i• •••i N M / •l it •f.t•N••iN1.11 .N MJM•_ s ;•._�i� _ .µ1...•1••N .. .. • • t Velt• WIH••NoNtf ••tK'.1•a•C •�nlMS t - ;L.,' °, N N i YYY _ ' watt,. •NN]•N{iNN•N•1• • • see •i • NN• N / //L &Ay paytft 11• ••f CCCCC. i•iN•NNi•N te•••• •i• • M••iO ••••••.•••• N p m•YYY•///" 611. 0.111.11.40*. PM.... fti.._� .-i HfNN••NNH •rY•f•• ••iHOtOttN1 iT•.•i•••M•s FFFF��� _ - • • iKf tiN••NNN3H• r� N A lir •N �{[ H .... N•N1NH - sf Miii-�K/V• \�n_)i�fi/'i�+/Nf•NN �� .1NG:$ • _ ti •i,i•NNN fNN•i1•N •• KNKir, NfH•sN •!.•••ft•n•.••N •f1f••N••N•MN• ' Nit%YiN s KYfi• •t•itN• pNCN•Higfi fNOH ••iNNiN•••i• •• N NN N•N•N fNtfiiiii •Nb••iiNNf9Ni.lCfittNiNK i.Mi1•••••••M•H•••N••••N iiNNNi•• N• iNi gNNfiC •••NaNiN3Qfp1•tNNNM•ifWli• if 1=1. ii,oliimoiliniumni. • . • . . - _ , T!■ /or '` 0 c # __ .... •••N• .• i•N n•NN•N.N '�1a ii •••. 04 •H••.H•• .Wi•.iN... •.•Mini -• .6141 S••s.11. ••IJS•iH C•i••••••sse•NN ••N• -. - t .s••N ••••••,.. 1 ..... to. N•NNNH•aHN>sN• •••N •••s• . •.• - 1 1111•••••• KNNNf.• • s.•.•s•. ..— ..•NS.••... Nom• •..H••NaN•Nf •N........ •• c •• ••• -- w•....'�f«'r - ____ •••••••• .,• a 3 • - I i «V•••N• e ...... •N•••••v 1••11••1• N....pmS•H••N NNS••• •t ........ NNN•N••N• `i• • _ • •••••••N.N..^a Nai.Y••Ni•• :.,•••••••••••••••• . 11••11•••1•N' 1111 •NN • SUMMARY: TOTAL II LO IS _ o . � ..— LOTS MEET ING BASIC REQUIREMENT s Lon. LOTS MOE I1NG SOLAR `BUILDING LINE a SOLAR 9s BAR LOTS. s ,.....� _ LOIS EXLMPIED FO =i Clt:t -eE a y ff .o Nt31 ES • Juatiticeetion attached . . •KN•N•••••••aN•YN•K•3NHlN•fN•N• . .-____ !_•v ,L,A4 Ma. _1,0.01 for oil lath except ntlairti/tnit grinAt attest . ...a..o..._....• those exempted 20 %iexornp a viandard;i..i... ••••••,..•••••••••••••••••••••• _ rumba:di renulrentent II they would shade a tot which ix not exempted •i••OC•pKi•••••N aN. NNS.a.v .... .....N. .S N.i..•.•N o•ti..af...HK. f '. - ^..S3t1 tR:iZ va. alwf ww... . -g... �. •_`__ 3 42 • • • Yd Nit 3111.4 EltiMI+ Aitl §? MeJ ICNd�W AU. husband ,„ for tho oaneiders'ilain her xwr lterolnaltor called grantee tet enrente he litamarits sir . Wan W 1' xi seginniai4 a ,r 1, T.211.114. .1ir'�. claim; .(t?�r 21.0 °3,0' 310,0 ,.y,R�°•4�'M1�:9tr1$ i t NAM Beginning ft1 3 Vast line of amid the true hs9 1030' to WCst 294,67 feet; th feet '1 ttruM '4P 1 'rte'+ . j t to all liens, a s of the date he ..:.kit $ Lb given' to l :�y ne tt 0'i ntOr To Idtrva anti to H The trip at actat 1n constlredie�d this d changes shadl he iar,plltl t In Witness Vl1'heteol it a corlrcrrote glfprito', it h (aridor of MI hoard of dko t T1Nrnt XNSTi>;U�vre�i1r *tCR1X1I t1N USE I .'t T ca�• tcK wt'riu 'mss APPR' 1't P►•NN$N0 PAi Ti?r1ut'lT e+e this 41100 e1 ePe uto6yyi 11 b 44 446.111 km b.. !Ai n 4: h, t Wiir41.msnf 4414o.41 StAtS 4�r ai4E0Ohli , C4>ilnd, UY k11.i11 t1i101Y111 7i to+imnos ,Lan trUtteht. ..r •Yl •iii 1'iHl•1 1 1 f114 � i M � i, +,l•.if.+• •• 1 �� m ��§�t;r�ai» ; f ► Rdti p idi idagt m+ i:.lm.rmioj. .^ a 1 e ts•ei n wo.a• it*. • • • ••• •• •Y1.■ M...+ �•ri•iirl after ttedtsf, does Ore s01 y PIAI3IN AN r1 BAttt bLQD gimp 2 7 ....,.:.i. .,. .5.. herriktf Lei castled grantor. b1» ' in,; soil and' ci nvo,d unto Ana Unto &ani ie'e holes, thiccsssoni arilf sesl na ta11 of then oortsIn real prop >9rty ',Alft : to ant? #pptr'rtorrarrrres !hereunto be1on ing.ar in ra�P,t+ ac a 1ppert�eIr,ing, situated in dl t C" tntr Vak of Oregon, described ae 1o11oWVe,, tlri. wit; MIL the 3 p� t 1Ji of the W.W. feat 'ahr� ip,t� t� Claim e1 mid :i Z4. 4 tch heard N.0030, E. 8IL l7 from the t .S. �M�i� r,: id.. P along t ant lr of claim l32 *0 , t 11.09 °24 °W 3Q W. 133.0 feet; x.09 °24" S..: 310,0 f t ti" it riq the East 20,0 feet which a in County , ttit t st =•t. of w. i�o r * rd C k South, age 1. West. %M I t> x tl 0 °30 at along the D. L. 0. 613.10 feat; tamer 09 °24' mat X3040 t to i g, this point being i the Mat 1 o 1x d lsmt ° It tad; theme the West line of said ! et 'r;` ad, 133e0 feet; t , t9 °24° oa South 1 °25' West 132,02 +�v trg thence l� ct i 80°24' Paint t 296,30 of 1 i3 gd al to as ° 10 of the ' plat tai; i ! And ��,i,,,,�,�,�y `I e1'1�it an o +°.�lICe'tt1ua..nts, kest i,o aions obligations of iret6:e d !� { egg .off . tt:01 �,., .;� r '1 tt rahlp: .. s+ .. ard no consideration has paid h c c. coneidaration paid I r this trari®lor, egited its towable al della� ft, is ,1y"�cl,a� , „ , 1 'deAataii w a+l a.1,d.„n r icutdt+t.110 tl erierirt:. ;er° f tivete ara►� a iN Ar d spud w Mt a tuattexit to r trims, the, atnquler h cij 9 ea t'he �n ?anr ®t s id ttI141tinifaat°dbari A:rat4 ►.or;a hereof apply a ,.felt t eoo,poe i art is >tldloinfaidte. Oleo e grantor has oh etlt d flees ae t ebrtfbldrtlay Lase . !n ,h14,7 `tretrt�rel0nt this., ,� . s cased itfl ndiaio tel tai eltj,isel and sail affixed b' its i?f h.' v'te, daily authorised thoroOo b>ri rat I �,((�� /���y • „� .%� - ,MM1R1. .Y1 op.)? d IN:iM:iirl: + �Yii 1 r•4rriri r.Yrri iriiiiu.7ri YliBiii■i.Y • .1 ./1 ::FnP':imYV+WiriiiiiGr mM.•�v4rrLew: •stir.. i.....444.44.4.04O.404 ... tt! AC1 INSINFICItNrt CON 1114111 013C410t10N 9A INel 5101$ d the memo unto did $dud amides r5'tlt „ 1+1!p i lilt i • it ae,�i r'altltt'a °e 1181r8 su r y .c:is OUJF�rH•?4ttn'ss THAT AN 'It MADit OIL' Tbs. PRO1{ IITY *41ENT.. A EUItIVII B11Q1.11.0 �»+Mi�•r� T o v�crdit r *k�RQV14 U553, .i I+.IAI 10Aiiddlryi yyy ry i1 �yr�p .p. ■ bi /. Op ,maws , County ct r i . .44 .......... )� ► I r @, 'Pin twblaafn4!lndtrUra. itignoikltaiia U 1 iN •• • ••• 11 , t- • � ,rrj . „11 i1 il)aU.-..bi. ,... • ••1.1• • . :Idawidtint Arid hp,, CX X .OR COUNTY i ii1�iYYi i. IYYlii1i111•• ii► U. fYi +r +r ►•+iw,4Is5SilriYllYilli. /IY1.i:.....i..'•irri - 1 -ie ' ' id'AiM. diy1' &/1u11�'Q Y 11„N,il . i i Li •1 •,1..1, • 0 04,144 41. .: «.aprirlWi.u1 ei u04041 ,. • „ , •1i1r• 1' t. i F a ► J, 1 1N t l%�.•r i • 1�.. 1r it i! ' l • �. Iis 111► l ralifir ii` i v 1 y S ul I'te Watiri4e & •. SrUcr'G A., Warner i •rll II Yi:.l• . ... If r• }y�• .yJ yI if , •,1 1 i1{; ,f 1 I i j�f il• / •..1 • : I Q 1• •, • ,••: rr,i.l•1.1 •I , µ •µ• 1 • dorrAfel/otheizt Mussel! at tht poratleii. plash tnr tilvi,goh M; r®r, 'ktiilhtie for A /ash> " . tortin4iriiIIt71i 4I lien! • a.aMw io4y i71+Aiu�tln r w.1, ANA Arirtdgt }a i.... G 1 CO, l,nitriSti len B 4=. ii Ndri Ail* 4004 iIa8 ilc.in WI • ��. C'1Yc1l;"leo Mattx 1 1600 Q9thaanco Aletg for t1aa11, O2 aA °. Nails a diano l adquadati Nlr'ta 4410; GM. SCO T>ta�ter t' i 10300 ` tOntt y ANi, 46hri uN 1001 SW 5th 47264, rikiip• win ._ ii Ilk r i bioeSl 1. 04 t'.t1®u$n, 44(ifio, 04.44a 0404000AD 006' i+�con "nri'a uor • rf u ® 11 !f iii del .was irww Pr1 li4P�1 /�07 *i a �1igAiaurviri.Iiid i,t,► . j ae�®e►te.; , X60 TOO �atei811a .05101{1 ti* ' '8+nese a,tty, cap h 9h0 !Mild �1a0r t edit bnd en0O ilod 11► >r e' do k� air pr°', t �ee� 'a1i 011101114"lltatt rr= alt i ii,r0 • .82M "ft trit-wokletv 5583 kNo At 11P;VIN,TCE R M Oaonsfderatiun a to grantor pJco by ttpreJrseitkr +attO t e rho leAltlrety. the ,h#1 hrr'tlio'ami ate M d W;oshin'ton i2» �fq. �i�i �IIM�'ii1Jw1 e'wa .►, .. l.• _ -. _ . «T4'S�i �� :�.�w,eN,� SAY BY T Ists ProsenTS Thai,. RT I M, �� �,. , �M Q�..�ss d , ,:,�.. ,... • ., gI,w ON 4.. lalband,. ng1,1.' i r ,•. ..,.... ,...;.,,Ai�•.,.}.♦MAIO. r.,w�,•,.1y�...i• •.,�, r gt1�a/ /�� i.. 1, a. (10�p�'I H, , •nArl rr rlfr. 1 i h.., 1, u L*redelt t COW f A.."'mtem F�•' �'}i'11 .I 4d{1O7t k R fr M�. Kw, mr ^9; MI ref r ,a >11e r4 1001100 • . 40.1 I ..•••.4 ..., ••• . • 0111.. 11 Y 444 .01 :r is. II 41 ••... 01 •l. •.1 014 44 1 . iYND S . 1 EMS • anti., • •Iilr .,}� 11 ,Jy..A•.,..,.J ��}. Ir.•r l.�i 4.. . f•• rr . I..J Y. ••U 10e �. • r., W1014160 4 i* erif a 4r l'4ees, does herby ;peat, berjlein, grit 41,4 eOevery imitio the gitrat tee► att tan: aatr of the sueVivor tint, tnrfr tieeidroe, that certd ►» re l ptailetty, WIN the tenent tts, ppattie canoe they unto taro ft rar ippetteiriing, ei,Ittated Mt Courtly of a State of Oae n, c'escribecr .e& tuft ws. to4witr Tract 1VO. 11 .aweoeq.mrr. • .n41.,. +r . Beginning dat'i0 1, T. 2S, RI W. W 8 291,70.toat; t enco p411rtt boing in the iJ lino of saN Cognty Si 12$ V. x32.0 f Beginning at Aa 1 T. 2$.it.1W.,11I ; 54 tt 1.70 feet; thence pii►intbaln j in ti+b:We '&eat line eat` said. Co thence S. l'251 W. 1 point of beginning. tract 1R,_11. . Beginning at th Section 1r Ti 2$, Rt Graham B.L.C. h i'5'.7Q of beginning, this p PJo30° e, atvng the id W. 301.01 feet; the ;o the t.r4oe point b1' " 2 COrner 2f the WX Crah'Mml0ona;lcd Lend Chien In :®r.,,... 'h1 / . ' 1 t r �r+'v 1r > f8tt thence N 0 30° g. along 'thl� East 1 ine of mold Graham 'At N 89 24' W. '350.0 feet to the true pobnt of beginning, this st I,rr' of a Cotarity Road: thence N. 0'301 t. •i +ng the West oed. 132.0 feet; &home N. 89 24' W.154.78 feet; thence ei;, thence S. 09 24i t. 299.691 Meet to the ;'Ue odInt of S.E. cvnftr'. of the W.W. Graham, Bonet tan Land Claim In Section them ft ►1, -n 3p' e. along the Bast i kne cof, said Crahem Aplw rd. Na 89'420 W, 350.0 feat to the tale pent of beginning. this tt the of a County iald ; thence J 030 ' 1. ao g the oty toad; 132.0 feet; thence 24 t. 29 .89 et; 2.02 feet; thence S. 89'24' 2..301.01 feet to the trace • 'LE. Como' of the w1W. Grehen3Obnatiot Land Claim in Beginning et th Stotler, i, T 2$0.R Gear D.L.C. 41•,x' Qf .beg; nni ng. chit P R9°2t+' W. 303.12 fee e. 309.23 t'eet to eh, the West line Of titja W. o,.ti.; thence N.„.0 36' E.clo the text line of said feet. thence N. $91° r�w 24° West 39®.0 feet Ito the true point lilt being In the West !Ina Or a CtiUeltte R'tiid, thane* M st line of said Coutat, Road. 1321.0 feet ; thence N. /J9'�'210 be t. 1 -25' W. 132.02 17,Bet: ;han0ri S. 89"210 E. 363.12 feet be9I nn i ng, S.i . cornet' of the W.W. grlhem !0oneticrn d..isnd Claire in 1 0 W. H.1 $henee M.0 °30° S, oboe; the ESst line of ,aat4 feet; thence 16. R1,1-241 W, 350.0 feet tb the true point . i tilt liming In ine West 1 l na of a County heed; tIer,cn A. thence S. 1 23' W, 132.02 feet; thens�b S. 89 2b' west floc of the County :toad; thence 1i Od30' C. aloe.; ounty final! 132.0 feet to the true point' *f begloutt0 . i 4 l ' t t NaNDBRaNg BMW 416,15 6'1'311 W& a$1169l 4•l wa. love /.lull• wwwwwwwwww •. 1 1 1 11.wM ••.1V MAR '93 • 03: 0 1PlYi F 4TC0 tBVTN 5503 657 0924,;.,610,441',' ,ry M. , I . .. V , / 1• , 1 ; 1 .1 11. 4 1, it1t�+ 11 • 1.1 +.�V. M. 1i 4; 1V,ry`Atas. : t r ' i »� d. • • i •,p ' 111 • 11 '� 1. 111 +O• 011••"•rj•�,wll LlV�r .111' • , 1. • 1111. 1r tii�,:tl. fat 4096 nl•,.,•r.111771 1yI I'i. ; 5583 rat t;oe ''1 12, 13 c 11443,pet by the entir And that 'granter 1M:1h.11n111.11ewN: 1 +11 w 110111 i 1 i i 1111 / N l/ 11111111:1 .7 ++f••1LIi1 .1•::71114 . and tlantr are Memel 0401•4 In CO WIT va and t4 Hold the above deeeribed andligrevilvd premises unto tho ads gra.eita.,, !A leriontig 4, their he1rl 111 attildna lorevea, &htpi• .}'i b3° rovenante to alrid With dratnte+ee eigl the helm of the eUroir *a' and ehalr ateoi,$hi. 1: lawfully reiee4 in in simple of tho obaava t@rrniaal; toadies, free loom 411 enturnbroneee 111Wrw1•111y1/ry, +1..1.111YIIIf. 111 1 /11w/wwp1.•..:/1`Ilrylilry.r11N 11.11 I/Ii11 Y� . N 111.1 11.1 11 11111 111.YNN.,L,1.W:H.•✓ /•+.•..1111111. r f.1N +i1Hw•1w1 .t /1: 11•. 1/. 11,1.1H, TMII „K/111:111/11f7111,1/J/r1.7,i1w /.1,7//7117,411017.11.14......17.11 01111111.111�j//1 111 /NNIr/..iur111•""M:tlH ............I::.H..s.... 11111111.:1.11.14..•« .:..x.11.1 ./11111111.... 11111.11« .... 1:141 ,7•44•11•11 47 111... 1.17111.•�ry 1fll•1111. /1..u. 11 111 111•••:.1. .•:11111 •• 11 •■• :1111 11•4.1., {1171111111 Yli 1111 . 1/1 it .. # 1 If 111. e..� •4111 11111111111 { 11111 11• /f 111111•... :.• : 11:1.11.1111 itor *ill warrant ,end forever defend thra runtgd pram. ••.t artd over,v pert and p4rcoi of the leoelol alalrne and domande el all pereem w einneoeY r. truing the deed and Where the a intent ats ree ubps, the 'angular k 1udee t1* :Alps); grantor's And bra ate44l fhb 15 11. 1 day or August 111 ,1 , 671 ?r4 " °M 1l ?..1 V 111. 00111 •11•1 1. ($CAzr) 4114111/ . (SAL) f1 (134•1) 1 •1 1 11.1 QYWY/ RLOQN, County o. F a m : 1 .1,+ , . eel 1 • 11 .1 , J9 114 aippeare4 the ebovo narn6d Robert er1t 1` ;.11.Pe1s ®n111ar; ,,Berti.ic ®R 1 1.1 ',11) pll ,sti! ., ,.5,1,1, 01 1,1 s. 47 1;\ o f itl 117 P 1• 1 1 11 4 kl ; j�,i� 1, 1 NIA • 1 'd [•0f ∎' "S��P/ • 1+11' GI 1, �f,s.,111,b,2 r •i 1 +1. ...1 y SAM htla bar.`d. 1.cc*idfIflf, i1�• 4•+ ' .11•••11111 11.111 /f � 1 *,,f+ :.1111 11111:•1.1./. 11 +: H. 1N:11 .i 11 ,.•. . . 11: +. t 1 1 y�r•. ,1y , f. ,4l owied d ed the foa'�' n4 drantrumertif tQ �broo-: 14,. y �' G u✓ V •taint eet and deed, Rotolo qt 1 Ato ary Pddblirp Ior Ores jon i • 1M1+ orititliaolori o tprieeti My wommission epilc$ JiltX j4,1,19 ( t ., +14 tht�41� � �° •Irk.. B ��y� �i J[1. 4 1 0110 ' ~' ... +1, y, ,.pi Oe 0 , i iii 4,4• c � �' a� s „I, 1 i i 40'1' •NwaNidi�l� {ft �61�i1Q'i�a �i1W t4• r.1 01/1 ,I14 don ai trarv0�d,ic 111 •01iiiiith Ao lirrpt ,l evttdttl 01.1 itio i..11 rn Il,.rionit r 61- 14.1.4■Ii1,i0ii , ,itra..d nn 1 6 ` nd la n 1• i 11, • i 1 In 41 ;teirdF as I 1 lb1 4a•i014 1 i) ,1 Wila6ni tit► hGa�d ui;e aeanl tillit At.. illdio103114, G1litfbr Y •1 •1•il •41:'11 1111111::..1,+1 Rceio 1 1Y. +1 11 `i 14111111•4 / +..r1••a +1 ®b'4 r,sril10t4 'ra Otto 1.441► ,.1,"711•'7 ��" s e BO 5u�� 1 t1 I fa1 1f ftt'i� r 111 /1 rY 1p 1�1 / `}+ iks/ r is +0 7 •jt ! 1'ti i 1 v' 401 402 ( ace ODE 30 ro4letiv •ai. _-.,• l�+1!✓i,Vyou `w11W ►aoe;••- .}.iri r.,.:..: =��, �4d1A+M••iWr..i �e,1m�1++1Y �. 1 L . Y �'�.� • 1 11 + 60 i • 111 ,1 1 � 11 I � i 1) ,'-, Il, 1 ; 1'lY1 111 . si sot =, too d iY 1 t 111 1111 rl 1 + 7 #'7 y� •i11��'�� 1 f' � i1�1']i�i,�,,l���'•1 iIl��1 i1i`ktt1; +1�ri,`Ir +�1A++f '. y -�: i4•. -_- '+� + +9 __. FIrRwIT OF MA/LING STAFF OF OREGON Couvt! of WaahLigton City of Tigard It 1 . , being fist 4u iy sworn /af f Irm k nn oath depose and say: (Please print) That I am a ..T, ea 36411/21S:- for The . i y of Tigard B Ori, .'"'on n That I served NOTICE Or PUBLIC HEARING lOR: Thal: I served NtTICI OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Pl nnng Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer �,. Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Deoiai ®n' of which is attached (Ma rkcd Exhibit attached list m rk d mailed xhibit "Beach on named he day of h 4.,..4„ address a aowd19 n the 0 i notice NOTICE Of DECISION as heroto attached® wag « sted on an app ropri to bulletin board en the ,, day of , ...� . i 19 3 and deposited ��t�a a prepaid. � day in the United States 29iaq�il on the da of � ge F P deui Prepared Notice `r - w,ls w `� �` duly` of �i�+CrdAA sworn/affirm to me !bY"l, tB1'� ' Y AtAI 4 1 l , Aud, PVELIC OF OREda ilf. By Commission R tree: CP NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINr, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, Ma*►► _ 10„ 1993 , AT V,,e00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OP THE TIGARD CIVT;C CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: SUB 93 -0009 FILE TITLE: Grasco /Petrie • APPLICANT: Craig Petrie OWNERS: G va ®co Investments 18262 SW Bryant Road 10300 SW Century Oak Dr.. Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Tigard, OR 97223 Raymond & Phylias ;tea 13400 SW Fir St. Tigard, OR 07223 REQUEST. SUBDIVISION SUB 93 -0009 G_RAScQ PETRTE The applicant requests Subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide a 3.2 acre site into 11 lots ;,artging in Size from 10,027 to 18,528 Square feet. APPLICABLE REV7i2W CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.48, 18.88, 11.92, 18.102, 18.108, 18 «150, 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policieb. 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 0.1.1, and 8.1,;3. LOCATION: 13400 SW 76th Avenue, the northwest cornea of SW 74th and Cherry Drive and two lots in between (WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lots 3300, 3400, 3600, and 3601) ZONE: R -3.5 (Reaidental f 3.5 units /acre) The 11-,3.5 zone allows single f lly detached residential units public support fac,�a.:. -Les, residential tree∎ cnent homes, .:..arming, manufactui d homes, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, and accessory Structures among other uSea. THE PUBLIC HEARING IN THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WIT7, TEM RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEIiIT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY OR RULE; OF PAOCr.URE SET ;FORTH IN CHAI,Ti 18.30 ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSPID ACTION NA%' DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONT ))LAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC *.�'..�lAI3ING, THE OPEN S OFJr'�CER WI>:�� RECEIVE A r STAFF REI%ORSi' FROM TEE CIT C PL-AI\�N&•RFiL+`e�RII�I� T PUBLIC FiGARINKdp AND INVITE BOTH ORAL PRESENTATION TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE H PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER ' ..... ER IMEETINO TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, �A EZL9SE TEE PUBi�.IC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON TIDE APPT. �ICATION. I F A PERSON SUBMIT E`ViD' r d f Hri dE IN SUPPORT TO VIE APPLICATION AFTER kraY 20 1993 , ANY PARTY ENTITLED T¢ REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF TP ERE IS kSO CONTINUANCE OVA RIAD AT THE THE .. MAY Qa HEA�,EIfi1G, ANY PARTICIPANT IN Tw1E TrIEARIN�'r MF►, 'RE I...:��T THAT TFM' RECORD 'AMAIN OPEN OR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARINO. INCLUDED IN T'HIs : N 1C is A LIST OF'APPAWAL CRITERIA AP LICAHLF TO Tat =QUEST, FROM , TIOARD OOI ' NIT D '!J LOPME T (ODE _ AND TEE, TIGARD CO R -,iE, PLZ L,. ► APPPCV OR DISAPPROVAL WISE i QUEST V TEE SINGS OFF/CC'!? WILL BE DAuatD UPON THESE' B CRITERIA, AND THESE' CRITERIA ''ONLY. AT TBE HEARING IT IS IMPORTA lT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REO1;1EHT PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO TUE APPLIOAKisit'OttERIAI } I5TED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE 'N PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOFa TO TUE CLOSE Or' THE I EC PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY ,MO AI�RO THE DECI SIO N RAOPPORTUNI TO RESPOND TO TUE YB$E PCLUDE AN APPU hL TO THE LAND USE HOARD OP APPEALS BASED ON THAT IoHUE ?� .Documums AND APPLICABLE CRYTHRIA tN b1I. ABOVE ...NOTED FILE 'ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTXON AT NO COST. OR COPI},IH QM BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE iE!10. IRXNG9 A COPY OF THE STAFF IMPORT WILL BE AVRx1 MLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBBTAINBD I FOR TEN CENTS , PER PAGE. FOR F�ir �� . R INFORMATION P L ASE iCONTACT TES STAFF PLANNVA Reajtaperol, AT 639- 4171D TIGARD HALL, 13125 SW HALL L4LVD + , OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNXNG ORGANISATION (I?Oi # CHAIRPERSON: p ... &til.: TECH CIENTIu"c! 0111 i • • • ONIENIMMIROMMINRIalmommoom 2S10100-00100 'e,..•.•...oeo••�.o °••. GRECO, GUS LOVAINE 13425 SW 72ND AVE TIGAVtD OR 97223 281011)0.00300 a- GBABCO INVESTMA'3m I /RONSON, A BRRITT 419 W CLAIRMONT AVE PLACENTIA CA 92670 2S101D0-00500 eo.•o••o�•.s800ee•.o. GAGE, ROBERT S trituaum, T BN & ROTE 9900 SW i , SI IPR' 611TE 113 7")RTLAND OR • 97225 2S101DC -01400 oamep.o. . NACRAY, ROBYN L AND BRUCE U 7430 SW CHERRY rarirs TIGARD OR 97223 281010C-01600 ••......+.••e.••.• °'d•• TRUb4UULL, DONALD R w , PRANCES 7470 SW CHERRY ST TIGARD OR 97223 2510:00 -01800 i. .nouo.oi•ooeoei MASON, JEAN ANN TR 7510 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 2E3ii1 C. -02000 .............. WIDZIAEg =MAD E 'Ma C 75517 SW CHERRY _. TIGARD OR 97223 2eU01DO.- 02200 44440 e 0 .4 4 4 8•o.o•eu ► SVEYAERT'e R SMILEY EILEEN S0 SW CHERRY TZGARD OR 97223 28101D0-024OU roe a.o 44440 a••.•'•aee mEmovIciso ROBERT BARBARA 0:7 7630 SW CHERRY ST TIGARD OR` 223 281O1DC- -02600 oeOO9O4.a OC4044®..o4. FIRST INTERSTATE BA NR OF OREGO� g' ld A tR0Sitit BY P44`WELta JAMES NYVIVIAB h 76 &0 SSW FIR P0Rii``D OR 9722;3 253.01DC-06(00 ...... • D CFOF , WILLIAM GEC b MARGARET . 13455 SW 72ND AVE =GARB OR 97223 ..O e... 9''w• — •..•...•.... 2S101DD A�i4D0 .�...... M ES!E, ANTHONY . 13565 SW 72ND min TIEGARD OR 97223 2S10 —01300 °er9..o•6o. 0000000000 JOLLY,, WAYN3 RAY & JOYCE 3t1PaN iE 7410 SW CHEWY DR T!G 3D OR 97223 2310100- 01500 eoo•000•eoe•0000000�ra STE'WARTs _ CAROLE J 7450 SW CHERRY ST POBTD OR 97223 2S101DC 01700 •000•oe000000000 o UM // MEL & CLAIRE 7490 SW CHERRY DR TIC OR 9722; 2510100 -01900 a rr • e o .. o r HERMA SON, PATRICIA M 7530 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 • 21y71O1D6 02100 .Oee40e464:x STRwART, •MuWEI 0176 A 7570 SR cortatt 011 TIGAND OR 97223 d o 2S101DC- 02300 ' .................... TAlum EX, WAYNE a SHARON 1610 ST CHERRY ST TIGARD OR 912,23 2S101DO -02500 oo 44 44404 a 44444 1 A3ri R,- QTR D AAD 7650 SW OB RRY DR � TIGARD OR 97223 2810116 -02700 ®oe.0440040 a644,4604 iRtik40 TR aOtng 7630 PIA ST ttahlei OA_ 01223 . . - A4 tis� • rad Ca 281 10lC428O0 • • o, o • • e ..• •, ti » • • 4. • • ainMIN, MARY, 761 C1t$ DR Vtchit9 OR '7223 '21410.b9V'° 03000 e 4 ro e e o 4 e• is a s• e• s• a• r. a EDW 5, G'�i,��LGOR4�. JOAN 7545 rhif CHERRY TiGh90 97223 2810 3200 •4•..ore •4 44 00• COND011, =QED C 7475 511 cwsltwr ST WiliTTAIND OR 97223 O •, 810 3043500 4O +i•a•6ea • . SNITS, RVII! V zristratt 13415 Sw 72RD TIGARD OR 97223 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 23 0p yi502 • WALKER, JAMES CALVIN 13405 SW 74TH TIMM OR 97223 281O1DC 4602 0000000eem•eeitose4enei AMINE PRINTING INC 8140 814 NIMBUS �/ 4VERIIOR OR 97005 28101DB .40609 s®4d iiioi1.U4e ®m®+teeed C GEORGE DRPRX 7665 sw FXR T1G RI OR 97223 28101DC. 0 O .........0....... calm, - �, itsuniee A. e4 A 7595 SW PR• • TIGARD OR 97223 • 44' 283,01DC 03101 .e ••4•• ♦e44•• o.•. • yoRZN , D IS U IN /MUM, 7495. sw CHEICRY " TIGARD Oat 97223 �f 28101DC-�D3302 04.4• • 4op4• ss •e• OTTO, L LORRI3 HAT 7435 SW CHEM TIGARD OR 97223 251OliC •03501 4•e•e••• •lea••••••• T AUC1`C, CM T 8 3 AND EMIZZ il3RT14 D 13395 SW 72,4 TIGARD OR 94'223 2S11O.IbaJh.A°7=%�46001 • o te+ 4 a �. o e e w +• w W w o 6 m WAb V ''Y i PR6/P 1.D' S i!;:t 1349 X1PICLNI 'HONOLULU 51 96901 25101D044603 WATZ L PRO 1349 SID HONOLULU U 0000004i/00000 e o e 4 o e 4 o e IRS CORP 969 ®1 04 251 01DR°9061 0 0eaeson•o•44ee•ee4, TROT, PAT AND WASS 77Oa SW CHERRY $` TIOA 97221' 29101D 00615 44444464 de4m4ee44eo4 1331 Ede 76TH TIGARD DR 97223 2810101340617 . so do eeeuou +4o00 144$ a446 TRY 3 LARRY IR PEG FL 13360 SW 16TR AVE TIGARD oR 97223 ,2S1O3.D8..00619 o4oeo444 4e0 e4 HO a GERALD E OR Ate matt 13280 SW 16114 TIGARD OR 91223 281010E410616 e44eee04ae t e4o'4 R0t deal [WA V ANY IRJORIE B' 133ss sO 76111 TxGARb OR 97223 2SiOaliR, s-tiO615 4 e ,m 4. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4• mskagtg 6 0010 4ILD D 13320 `1 76111 A TIG?AD o4 91223 2s1��.Cai8.4090® •64444444440444444i644 c RR i o JAMS 0 6c PATRICIA L AI4 tocad eitniskY WETA. Ds tam YtOCKWELL 164 RINOE GATE LAIR OfilEGO Olt 977036 tl : +r • `4 "S.; OcKsr4 Jitrysity R. ET AL B7K w* lU 154 '3 `3A= OR 077035 : G .I ,1 x 262 = EgYANT LOA 051NEX30 OR 97 2S101DC -02800 x GUTHRIE, PLOYD ! NARY 7615, "SW CHERRY DR TIGARD-DR' ? :97223 eirooe 281010C° .......06............ CHICK X A MARIBETH A 7595 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR r ` 97223 �42S1O1Dit.. 03000 e e o .... • . 66646.66 EDWARDS, GREGORY L 1EN JOAN ,75455 SW CHERRY TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC 5!200 • 4.... • . CORDON 1 ` ' EDW ; C 7475 SW "C} ERRY ; ST PORTLAND OR i 97223 2S1u10CY -0310& ...... o ,+ "a a • . • ....... WOR2NIAK, D7d “I'IS FRANKLIN NANCY ANN 7495 SW CHERRY TIGARD OR 97223 .. 2!10100 -03302 ... e• o .. e• e a 01 TO, WALTER I. LORRIE MAY 7435 SW CHERRY TIGARD OR 97223 '2S1010C -03500 ... ose•eueieoweee•• �Gl °iT'7 H, MARVIN ir EILEEN 0113415 SW 72ND i F TIGAED OR 97223 2610.1DC -03502 .•......e.•r..soo. 1 Y WALKER, JAMES CALVIN 1340 SW 74TH � , f 'TIGARD OR 97223 rn IS101DC -04602 66666666666666664,6 666 ARTLINE PRINTING, INC j.8140 SW NIMBUS EEAVERTON OR 91005 s 281010C-03501 ..................... LAUCK, CHARLES E AND nLIZABETH D 13395 SW 72MD TIGARD OR 97223 d � WATUMULL PROPERTIES • CORP • e • e e e a • • 1349 KAPIOLANI HONOLULU HI 96801 w,,2S1f1DH�0060�' Me r e s ?4', GUTHRXE,, GEORGE ')EREK: z 7665 SW FIR ,,TIGARD OR 97223 2810100. 04460 oe.. ..0.•se.�•eeree NATUHULL PROPERTIES CORP 1349 KAPIOLANI HONOLULU HNC 46801 • • • • e • • • e • • O • • ..7 2a10114° -d 4j.” ,lya b _u.„ . •d • o m;e c • e o • s i e e e • e„ 'ROTTI 0 PAT AND LOUISE 7705 SW CHERRY ST TIGARD OR 97223 2S1C IDB -00615 WILLIAMS, KENYA E 13315 SW 76TH lA TIGARD OR 97223 ..A . ,2S101DB -00617 'COUNTRYMAN, E 13360 SW 76TH TIGARD OR e e o e ie a 8•• 4 a o e e e e i o s e u LPRk' & PEG H AVE 97223 2510108- 0Q6�19 e4seo a eae • ',.'HOWti GERALD tHeA.A110. u0NInd • x:3280 SW 76TH TIGARD OR 97223 e oe o ee 66 20101D8 -- 00616 eeeeesee'eoeseeo , ee•eeN ROSSMAN, DALE V AND MAR ]ORIE F 13355 SW 75TH TiOMW OR 97223 2S1011D8- 1120618 664.66446'6664644666460 MYERS, KENNETH EDWARDS 13Xi MILDRED JEAY 320 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD OR 07223 2S101DE 00800 6661peoyeiedow6066 ee d GREEN, JAMES H S PATRICIA L AND COOP JEFFERY 1��3Y t3 E°1' AL HY MARK F.00IKW/gLL 164 KINGS GAT] LAkE OWEGO 012 97'7035 28101DC -00100 •.....w•.• GRECO, ` GUS LORAINE '13425 SW 72ND AVE .TIGARD OR 97223 R2S101DC- x00300 ..................... 'GRASnCO INVESTMENTS 11 MONSON, MERRITT H ',419 W CLAIRMONT AVE 'PLACENTIA CA 02670 2S101D0- ,00500 .. e e .. a .. • .. "GAGA, ROBERT R % rtIL1Tf, STEVEN & RUTH 9900 SW WILSHIRE STE 113 :PORTLAND OR ! 97225 q q 12S101DC -01400 o•w.e•eeeb.e' 14ACI�?AY, ROBYN L AND BRUCE E 7430 SW CHERRY DRIVE "TIGARD OR 97223 44‘ 4610=0.41600 -01 600 a • . . . . . . . . o . . . • • i IMBULL, DONALD X lyRANCES E 747O SW CHERRY'S` /,'} TIGARD' OR 97223 2spo1D■■c 8 ee•e••.•.ssseosie•s 2S10WMMMO�VOO MASON, JEAN ANN TR 1510 SW CHERRY DR 4TIOAPD OR 97223 2S101DC -02000 • .. o • .'a • • v a • 4 s . • . e . .41IDNAN, RICHARD E INEZ C 7550 SW CHERRY, TIGARD OR , 97223 25101DC -02200 ..is:.e.ie.o•i.iobbea STEYAERT, dARL R SHI2LEY EILEEN 7990 SW CHERRY TIGARD OR 91223 251,01DC ^02400 .•.aRe.cebbstl MEMOVICE, ROBERT H BARBARA J 7630 SW CHERRY ST 41G 410hgb OR 97223, 2S1O .D�: -0W0 1, a .. • •° w ,. DICROFF, ;; WILLIAM GEORGE MARGARET 13455 SW 72ND ' AVE . TIGD OR 97223 25101DC -00400 ...• ro MAISSYM, ANTHONY o3 F 1355 SW 72ND AVE ". IGA)4D OR ,97223 25101D0-0i300 .. •es.ee•a.. +6wsr,e• JOLLY, RAY & JOYCE YVONNE , 7410 SW CHERRY DR TtGARD OR 97223 23101DC- 01500 a e••e 4. a...• STEWART, CAROLE rT 7450 SW CHERRY ST PORTLAND OR 97223 2S101I1C -01700 0.644.4o • • ;s • • Kfl tN�lI(, EMMEL & CLAIRE 740 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC -01900 44.44.-446410eie04444eiiii HERA `SON, PATRICIA 7530 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 07223 '25101DCe02100 444444.44.o. a.•e.Jee STEWART, MARTIN D & CARL 1► E 7570 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 2516 1B0 -02300 .e &.i•a.s..wess.s•eeo TAKAHASHI, WAYNE H VSA ON S 11O SW CHERRY ST TIGARD OR 97223 ...e••. "�S1Q�DC.02500 e...a a•4 4 4 • 4 .e 2S101DC- 02606 .ii.eie•.o.eio.eea.s. FIRST N T E R T E E A N t OF OREGON N A Tom...... +N �'xc�JS'E BY POWELL, JAglS N /V"IVIAN N 7660 SW FIR PbRTtiARb OR 97223 MAYER, KENNETH D QED JANICE IS, 7650 SW "CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC °02700 .seso.ea eiieuswaseso BRIAN, TAONAS JOHNH A 7630 FIR ST TIGARD OR 97223 Cv I1T,; T $ 'a & , PPTRZeXit `t CiOit; 44Et.'Rs lust 164 KXNG6 47i'n'z I` O WEGO 'OR 1 ' 977035 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] FROM: Tigard Planing Department ._.M. ,. � GR S PETRIE (NPO #5) The applicant requests • S���T�'I5 CbL� SUB !3 O�.a... Subdivision prelimtary plat approval to divide a 3.2 acre site into 11 l is ranging in size from 10,027 to 18,528 square feet. APPLXc BL REV/LW CRITERIA: O Development Cod ,;. Chapters 18.48, 13.8e, 8e, 18.92, annnunit y 0 ®ve r 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164; Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 18'.4.4, 7.6.1,, 8.1.1, i►‘nd 8.1.3. LOCATION: i 134,Ci0 W 76th A. thwest corner of SW 74th and Cherry Drkee and vertu ®, the rao��, 3600, and 3��OS ) tiro llets in between (WCTM 251 1DC, tax lots 3300, 3400, . 3 SONS R -3.5 Oestdental, 3.5 'twits/acre) The R -.3.5 zone allows single- family detached residential uit ®, public ®�pport xaclit e , residential treatment bomee, ,farming, manufactured homes, family y care, cupatioa s, `=m'Y ry r'y among other uses. r�� us ®o and accessory structures Attached i the Site Plan and applicant's ateeent for your review. From information supplied by variotas departments and agencies and from other ll be prepared information available to our staff, a report and recexendatio n vi p p Yf you wish and a (Moir ',on will be rendered on the proposal i' 'Lila near f �tur ].. o ou is f to comment .gin this application, we need your comments by Mar. . use the space provided below or attack,\ a separate I�Getter to return your comments. aare unable to Lesconc] bar the tbate latex.- p ase phone the staff contact ....low with your conmienta and confirm your cony ent i in writing ati soon as rnoss►ib].e. If you any questions regarTigard, nthis atter, contact the Tigard �' 22� _ PHd.N�NR 9 -4171. Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., 6 ST 'P CONTACT: Ron Pozns;r. o y PLLm SI, CHECK 'ME FOLLOWING ITEMS VAT OM: �..,, We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. .......o ..{ please conta�et of our off ice m Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Corraientst //tilW93Y►S1' ATI0N LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS CITY DEPART,OTS Building OfficiaaiiBrad R. ty ).corder Emq$J eier3aag /t bX3. Permits Coordinator/Viola G. SPECIAL DIS tie lire District (Pick-up box) .w ..., k erks S Ba :egit :'`,on Board tics leau4 Operat :4 ns Sc o4: list ISo. 43 __.. 2 PO Boot 200 , OR 97075 inerd Water District „"� ."' • Siv Burnham St. - �C�.' , OR 97223 lei , ties Valley Water District 6 SW Taylors Perry Rdo gard, on 972x23 MC= SURISDIc! IireiS Wash. Co. Land Wee & Trafsp. 150 D. first Ave. 1o.' bowel, OR 97124 Brant Curtis .-- - Drain Martin Lyn % &Ai it 11 Fs+ad'i >ibatie elchoC1 Diet, 233 �) Pacific dye Tigard, OR 97223 Boa®ci.4.c1 Co/pmission 320 SW Stank Rom 530 Portland, OR 97204 >U --- 2000 $EW mare *Ire. Portia M,r OR 97201 -535,5 - Mib G' MESOMMEM City of Beaverton Jim F endryu PO Box 4755 Beaverton, ON 97076 City Ring City . City imager 15300 SW 116t't Eiu* !! ,ty Oat 97',224 C'ty of itkot Oswego G4ty mana9cr 360 SW A i' ake Oswego, OR 9 X34 S Y to Ltghv+'a7 Dirrir,; on Ron �...Doran PO DD 25412 'Portland, OR 972211 ^ - 0412 1 GENCIES DtCD (cPA °e only) :].75 Conrt St. ! Salem, OR 97310 -0590 5. SPEC City of Purina - City lAsneiger X7'40 b0 SW Upeer R,00aea Perry Rd. Tigaa.. OR 97224 C.ttx of Portland P1anu4r3g Director 1120 SW 5f.,F • Portland, and, ! • 97204 ODat LidwienRa usanm 9002 SE isctenghlie Blvd. Milwankie, VITA 97222 ✓General Telephone "— It s Wells 460 SW Man St. igard, OR 97223 SW Satural Can - Scott tia1nnr 220. NW Second Ave. Portland, OR 97209 Portland Oeaeial Elec. - Brian itoora '14655 SW Old Scholle Pry. e ton, OR 97007 • Metro D...rea ooaa sicatio — DeWitt T iu Oake Technology Cetlt or 1615 SW 169th Place 5.6020 Beaverton, CR 970 )6 -4066 us Went, eta Nelson . 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OS 97204 TCX Cable:teion of Oregon. Mike 043lock 3500„ SW Bold 5t. Pert? ando OR 31201 '-'— Coitiph1i C ble Ora* Ora* Stone) 14200 SW Srigadoon Ct. Beanvertot j OR 91005 STftTB Acg CIT S hAtonaiatice OA*. t0DO'T) 0tgincer ., �... Board oft Ekinttts `r.-. Find 6 wildlife . Parks a RecoOtien Div, Subdivioion Supervisor: Dept. of Energy . Dept. of Environ. Quality FEDE`tAL AGENCIES boramo, la9viiioa� of State rani,,. C e ees Dm . d a .la. Park Aliftp deed t n it lc. ei:4 'twit, tcvd 'PfC Fire liershall oorpn. of Enginedn Punt Office mats- • tout-barn PaCIfIC Tranoportat.idn Company boo + 6th Forney P7S - „project Engineer k oeue. ig. 3rl4, Union Station POrrtl rod, OR 97209 CITY OF TIGARD PRE - APPLICATION OONFRRENCE DATE: X--<-514"),.5:-'7.4?-, I ■ Jr� 9Y�C■rA� Pd NTIAL APPLICANT' IGMJ��i .�L. IOENT: i'P1 +. Phr ne : a. Phones ,_,__, PROPERTY LOC flONEm � ,��� ,� � DA) t/ e-- PHOEBE ADDRESS: a. �: TAX MAP & TAX LOT: _,a 1yv0 340/, 33 NECESSARY AFDLXCATXON (S) : ��/ tJ �} I e1 tC ®Ss gg ,+7'okt °, n� �� 'a4 a� � � �►n�N jt gLIc 6 p T. Ern ARM PR2'DP ►8A►3', DESCRIPTION: r .or Bt�i ✓e �® ,� ,■. * Cr,14PREaB+ SXVE PLAN DESIGNATION: O,A1,, ZONING DESIGNATION: ..L`.. 61' NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNZN t ORGANIZATION # CHAXRP, 'RSOIar R CJL./kP1K II JS' PHONE'; .14,21:1113. P. ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REWIREMSNTS Minimum lot :size 1 eq. ft. minimum loth wi'>;h : ft. Setback front .: _241_ ft. side �„Z ft., rear ,,,, ft garage .../211. ft. corner ,., ft. from both streets Maximum site coverages . .% Mi i.mum 1.andscaped or xaatura l vegetation area: % Na:,vimur, building height: ft. ADDITIONAL LOV DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor laud ® Lots created as part of a partitioi,a, must have a parti�� ion process. mini.mun of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 fco'I Wide access easemelt Maximum lot depth to Width rats i.c of 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL FETSACItS Es :. b n ed araai -- } from - -- r. elan ■�YM'�■I�Y!M■M�.`�rw■■os1■ Lt:�irvF'l -- t @i3E3i _ Z I �lw ±..ca... �Yao L e w.ti e•S� —�!�ir qd ■irw:.r...`■■:. i:l�■..■r bou, idary Flag lot: 10 Coot side yarn setback. P Zero lot line tots: mininium 10 foot Separation between building Multi mil rOsiidential building separation: See de Section Square • ro Accessory structures up to 523 fee 5 f t e mini mm Setback from u Side and rear lot linens. Accessory ter. + ueture up to 1000 sq. ft. on parcels of at .eamt M.5 acres in sie - See applicable zoning d,tatrict Setbacke kor priMary Structured. g Page 1 a1r1wwION+.MINIM,. FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS hfa xiMuu height of 1.4/2 stories or 25 feet, whichever is loom in most _-..9 e2 � et in R ar mete R -25 o* 11.-40 apnea if zones; � , _, _ stories or 35 feet et;ndaxds o2 Code ,section 18.98.030() REa3ID3Commu titySl� veld CALCULATION Chapter 18.92 specifies that the net r+w IO � y a? esi4ontial units allowed on a particular site nay be calculated by c . ,viding the net a ri;ba of the dl *velopable area by the minimum number of rg are feet required per dwelling unit in the applicable zoning district. Net development area i. calculated by eubtraudBeing th following land area (is) from the gross site areas 1. All sensitive lands areas land within the 100 year floodplain elop+as exceeding 205; drainag. ways Land dedicated for park purposes Public right-of-way dedication All land provided for private streets through parking areas) Tigard allows a residential densii.ty transfer of up to 25% of The City o.: g lands untte that :could otherwise have been developed ion sensitive ' areas listed in (1) above to the developable portion of the Site in accordance with Code Section 18.92.030. It is the responsibility of the applicant for a xesidentiai d ►vR cpmont . . ! .I,r� +t ! I h the peri fitted appla�c�►t n f1�r bat residential deny it nand the�aden y transferio�x'T a � r'i r i ESIDENTAL DENSITY TRANSITION Regardless of the alto property within 100 f developed at a ee . . Com,,lrehe Sive Plan de density in a toning district, any gn; stabll,shed area shall not be than 125 percent of the maximum zoning) of the adj agent' parcel, of RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS All eubdivisione and minor partitions are sebjeet to solar access 80% of all lots created mt:st be Oriented for recluir+e►n�;ats which state that solar accessibility. The characteristics of a solar -- oriented lot are high levete of wintertime sun ,xtriking the south walls and roofs of the house, house orientation maximizing south window area, and a south-sloping in roof To achieve this, one may Utilize the following: a. Basic requirement: Lots with at least a 90 foot north -south lot dimension and a front lot line orientation within 30 deg, reel of an east -weat axis; oleic ted Solar Building Lines The solar building line i►tuet a) be oriented Within 30 degrees of east -west, b) be a minimum of 70 feet from the middle of the lot to the south, c) be a minimum of 45 feet from the northernmost buildable e bounds 3 of the subject t lot. ..- , " ..:. The x P _... d P eve at 1 be Performance M Options: �de sees of an east-west axis ®an h�, house � least oriented within g 80% itlf the ground f lour s s south wall protected from shade. The second option ribquiref; that at least 32% Of the glass and 500 ocluare feet .. o .. .w r p... m shade o c� ,�f the roof area fay'.® south and be protected fro Page 2 Total or partial exemption of a site from the solar be approved for the followinc re/loons: access requirement can -. East, we or north lopes steeper than 20%. - Of i -site shade sources (structures, vegetation - Or - ite shade soureseo (vogotation) p Ad juetmente allowing a reduction of the 80% eclat' lot deOign requirement can be made for the fol.loc iag reasons s - Reduced density or an increased cost of at least five percent due to either: * east, west or north elope greater than 10 %, 0. significant natural feature, • existing road oe lotting pattern, * public easement or right - of-way. - Reduction in important development amenities- - Pre-existing shade (vegeation) . tagni. and text are regj. ed whic jr ficient to show tha the devellpment _ ccbzng�lie�l Avi la the so °�.ar� d9104n standards, or that specific: lot* 'should be exempted or adjusted out The following items shall be included in t"e analyeisa The north-south _ lot dimension =.nd front lot line orientation of each proposed o Protected building cted� solar buildin lines and relet. ant building site restrictions, if applicable; For the P e ose of identifying trees related to exemption requests, a Map shoving existing trees at leaat 30 feet t all and over 6 in ches diameter at a point 4 feet above grade, including their height, diameter, and species, and stating tPla►t they are to be retained; and d. Copies of all private restrictions relalting to solar access. topography) .' PA IG AND ACCESS Required automobile parking, ►,l aCeper dwelling unit. -one covered parking space per unit required -multi f am 1; ' with more than drooms require 't arking spaces per un 25% of required space® may be designated compact -only stendard parking space dimensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. Compact parking space dimensions: 8.5 ft. X 15 ft. Handicapped parking: ap& ropr- i. -tely be =.ted designate minimum number of handi apped parkin space Size are mandate ! . _, the hrrndout) . A handicapped parking space ehrface and 1E4 perking sa axr, appro ac spaces. areas providing shall provide handicapped parking spaces,, The spaces to be rovided and parking T-Disabilities Act (see e symbol shall be painted ca the Late sign Shall' be provided. Bicycle racks are required to'.. multi -faMily residential develogments. Sicycle racks shall be b eat: in area0 protected from a!rtomobile traffic and in con renient locati'e at LANDSCAPING Sre � pcq is fronting length. is or Street trees are requi for n1.,� eva�lo en� on a public or to street and f driveways IA a than 1 4Y- t in Private "' � '� ' � tree; must be plao ®d jeither tit �in t� right-of-way or on private property within six e t � f th i ` Ewa aounaryQ Street treed gust have a minimum call r of tw chen at foOr feet; above grade. street, treed Should be sPsc ed o 40 feet part dependtng on nature tree size. Further information, on regulations : ffeotinc 0t•eet trees and a list of recommended street trees may be ob fined from the Planning Division. SIGNS Permits must be obtained before erecting any eicn in th( City tpf Tigard. A 'PCuidolines for Sign Permits" handout in availah 0 upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be payrrmil,ted if thine eign 'proposal is reviewed as part of a deve1opm nt applioatirn. SENSITIVE LANDS code Chapter 18.84 'provides regulations for /ands potenti:- fly znsUitable ,6r development due to areas within the 100-year f'1oodpla,in, natural q ra3_ agewaye, wetland areas, on elopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to prelil4inarily identify sensitive land:71 areas at the P _ p p . i � conference E- b , based dry a vei 3 b1s information- However, he n �� i it to r ci ® ®1 idEti .eta Live land4 areas e_b d®uxrar fie �he r ®gin��. bil � of the . e me etin the aefinftione a riv idtcat an a ere Chapter 18.84 provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of ii s eitive land Y, are of . Residential ent is y � dc�velo prohibited lame e t cases, dedication of 100 -year floodplain area to the City for park and open space areas is required as a rorlditic of approval of a dovelOpme t application. 4. J► .;J ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR CommENTS 2.07- 51Zei- zcwe. 644106e 6E- MC-IC - No2416 1±11 -)7415 Gtr Li LO A.8 ,�,.� n� Ppego' M ' 0V t-4 c ,__1&Asj) 1)4-EA) 0002INC* ‘.)111,,W6E-D DeVEWPAIE-AT +0,E-Vh5) jy,i c A i7 tote . J5.9212±2:iit En245- bumkto YY. IY tJJ 3' ?&p 5 le) me . ea- Corm- le.oe.cao (4041) ,� d,q;+, , ;. tip 40 to ot(t'i + �" Ali parking areas and o ivewaga must be paved. 4 ,y Ministemereembeccesseel Hiinimui► access width: L N pd ,... Maximum access widths Pedestrian access must be provided between buLiding entrances and Parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public eieelwelks and streets. A mintaum of one tree per eev around all parking areas i screening of parking areas fro provided. rking spaces must be, planted in end -canopy effect. Landscaped iews from public rights-of-way must be For detailed information on deletgn requirements fsi r parking area and accesses, see community Develo rent Cede Chapters 18.106 and 18.106. U4EAR VISION AREA The city requi,ree that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet above grade at road /driveway, road/railroad, and road /road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional eslae ®ification 3D �fJ IUFFERING AND l In ortin tease privacy an between adjacent dove e City requires landeca Required buffer area are • f er areas must be occupied evergreen tr. ea and shrubs and must achie horozontal p1 inge. Site obscuring acre in some► cases an em,.._shel. buffer areas May only be occupied by vege walkways. Additional information on required buffer found in Code Chapter 18.100. Required buffer widths applicable to ft 3 along north boundary €t. along south boundar o radnoe or eliminate adverse noise or Pmentei, especially between different • =d buffer areas along certain e, escribed by the Code in tame f by a mixture of uoue and a balance - een virtica : and x, w encee are also required n if not required. Required ation, fences, utilities, and visual impact land uses: perimeters. width. Bu ev In addition, eight obscuring pea materials and sized, may be Yr�ai. area: P po o - �o eft. along east boundary ft e, along hest, boundary reeving is required aio g Page 4 • iin • • • PROCEDURE Pt blic hearing before the Land Use fe Administrative staff review. '�� m:ai.aesi.on�f l� r•�i� Public hearing before the Planning Co __ pub1,c ,hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission maki n a recommendati on �n the proposal to the City Council. Another pblic heating is held by the CitY, hni. AIL appliaatit na must be wt :Cepted by a Planning Division staff 'member er at the Community Development Department counter at clity Hall. Apyilicatiofe submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Appl ice.ziQnu submitted after ' 40'10 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for proceeeinq with the Lfollowing. Week° s applications for Pr oceseLng. No applicat,tonn will be accepted after 3 :00 Pal. on Fridays or 4:30 cn other days. Hasps aattbmi.tted with a aiaaolication sl, al1 folded iR ADtTA CE t . 8.5 y 11 incheaa . One 8.5 inch . sub t „d for attachment to the ets.f f r Sao . r___ ee administrative decision. The Planning Division and Engineering ➢ji'irieiog ether an a preli>:minary ,� „� g g r aw of the application and will determaine w , application te complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or copies of the submitted materials are needed: The administrative deCiation /public hearing typically Will occur 45 to 60 days after an application a� a accepted as complete approximately by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult issues opt re irin review b other' jurisdictions May take additional time to '� y review- Written decieionC are issued within 10 days of the hearing» A 10 day appeal al eriod follows 11 decisions, An appeal on this matter would be aemrd by the -�'. .,.. ...�• A basic flow diagram illustrating the revie' ' proceaa is available from the Planning Division The pre- application confer: nee and the notes of the conference are intended to inform thy§ prospective applicant of the primary Community Deve10 _ *ment Code requirements rements pp l aabl o development of a particular site, and to allow the) staff prospective applicant to die+ctrs the OPpOrtunitied anra con- trainta affecting development of the site. The ConferenCa and nbtee cannot cover ( l Code requirements and tepeotss of g P g that should a l -.. to the development of your Site plan. id sits lanniad pP' �' Pm provide - info_ mat ion required b y the CO d0 Shall not �'s,olure of the et��§af f to *' 1' conetitute a waiver of the appliCab;a1 etandarde or require lent e. it is recciaannended that a prospective applicant either obtain And read the Community Development Code or ask aaty c, utoaeticns of City Staff relative to Code requ /Lrement t prior to Submitting an applications Another , e-application conference is r s�,.. ... � n application its to be submitted more than silt months after this epreapplication conference, P Pp un,. \ �'y by ,.. lees t1�� Second conf ®r ®nCa3 iS de®ta?ed ;�annec ® ®a b the Planning n :vis ion PREPARED Dy s PLZZ NINC DI ISX0N PHONE: 63'9- 41/1, Page 6 y�� PU3LICu The prp o a of the pre-application conference is to: (i) identify ap_;►1leable Comprehensive, Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (i e) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant i.tneluding identifying who will be the final d vision maker ai ®d .c for the cppU.cation. The eastent of necessary public improvements and be required of the applicant will be recommender by City staff and to approved by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on they application. The following commmmm erite are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be requi ed as a condition of development approval for your project. iti ht�of -pia dedicdiona The City of Tigard requires that land area be cr dedicated to the public to increase abutting publim rights-of-way to the ultimate function .l street classification rights -of-way width � cified by y pm : or to create new streets. the Community 1�evQlo ont Code Approval of e R a development application for this sit:- will require dedication of right-of-way = to 1. �� f .i.._��,„. � feet from centerline. . .�:�.. ... .�_ .:.�... � K b _c centerline.,, to, °---�- -- feet from � �� l � Stot . rovem n aw a.5 , � ., r street improvetrientd will be necessary son 2. '+ street improvements will be necessary along 3. Street improvements will include .�__, feet . of pavement from $ centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of � arterials or major collectors), o a five- utility wires (in Most cases Alternatively, a fee ie collected), y foot wide B dewalk (may be wider on j ollectors), neceosary street aigno, etreetlighte, and a two year streetlightIng fee. N3 S Q impkotieznows O'ru 5 (UU 74M. TO a f" " oP k vt�m ,+r or o�iher neceesa public In ®omme cases where street improvements or x`�l' P *improvements are not currently practical, the street improvements may be deferred. an these cases, as a condition of deve o ne approval, pr _ nt the property owner (e) must execute a non - remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner d right to remonstrate against the ltormation of a local improvement district formed to improve: 1. l �2 2. Pedestrian ravel bLteitA s t itary Sewers s � snita�r sewer to this propeztg id an 1.!:1__ ' milt � y in oe -- �" the proposed Ch �:n� located mm lei �'" .data, n The close A t P� y .. er. .. ®e��xa J ' p � p ®deve:LO m;:r reso- Asibbil tysto extend the sewer along the a ro p osed development Y Pagel f 1' 0 ®" u 1 ,‘ the L ,..,, Water Dii tr : t ( g o xe x A ► l provides publio water service in the area of this fait. ,The District should be o19ntc oted for information regarding water 040.1y for your propesseed developMent. i re Pr ®tectiona Tualatin . g e Fire and Re ®cue Distr3.c t (ConteCt: Gene Rtrchi1 , 6 r® 3d ® ire protection services within she City cf T earer The District should b contacted for inf,ormatipn a g hr e i1g the wdelat.iacy of circulation systems, the need for fire 11ydrante, or other queatione related to fire proteotiOL . Other Agency Permits: Morin hewer itr�xaroveiraen�te s ST0EMWATER QTThLX,T! FEES The Unified Sewer atle Agency has established and the Management Re agreed to enforce, Resolution No. S,0-.43, Surf ace Water Mang gu ne requiring the cohatruotioa of on= =sito water quality facilities Hs Zees in resolution requires that a tee and /or lieu of their eaoaaetructica�nr The reso�.0 The fee is based on construction of a water quality facility be built. r. a • y portion the amount of impervious surface; ,c or every 2640 square *are feet o. thereof, the fee shall be $260.00. -s The City of Tigard determines if a fed or facility shall be bUilt '00oliimmi 0,, id TRAFFIC I199n0 Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee ITIF ordinance The Tra €fin Impact Pee program will collect :tees from slw ,, properties will be rec,ire� to the development based on the development's projected impact on the transportation system. Oa�velop�.ng proms bed on the number of tri'gn they are projeiloted to generate. The TIP is ealcu .ated based on type o t used size of project, and a general uze based fee , category. The TIP Ahaa1i be calcu1 t .grad at time of may permit issllancet In li�.bited circumstances, payment of the y e3 allowed to be! d eferre ° ustLl issuance o. f oc~upanal! Permit. Nefe ru.l of payment until til oocupancy ii� , perMisaibl® only when the CIF ad greater than $6,000.00. ,8TR£"ET 1pP ork 1�h M7.rT' public right-of-way shall commence until the apps . No work within a p.+�" cant has obtained a Street opening Engineering Department. ®nin hermit from the FyNIs en 'FLOOR g e c theht re iroe a grading -all submit . Plan . � , caal f lava ng Plan for each lot which � shall ®�n al P � .. have With the gradilNg Plan a typi elevations of four corner? of that plan g elevation at the the along with e1+ev corner of oath ',ot JO: Pa EAPP .MST FREFARED BY". ENGINEERING , ID/VISION PRONE: 639 =4111 Page 8 D :- Stuff Jc;i left@ !.,,l a 2 CITY OP TX!CAg COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST'' The items on the checklist below are required for tP a successful completion of Your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your ,application. Tha \s sheet MUST be brought b fitted with all other materials at the time you subanit your and ^ sta, i 7 t app1icat, on:. See your application for a ,,,.,..anation of ' these items or call Planning' at 639- -4171. BAST MATERIALS A) Application form (1 copy) 8) Owner's signature /written authorization C) Title transfer instrument Assessor's map Plot or site plan D) E) F) Applicat's state (H) Filing ?sae ($ SPECIFIC,: MATERIALS A) Site Information showi, , (No. of copies ) ; [ ] 1) Vicinity, Map 1 ] 2) Site size & dimensions t ] 8) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) t 4) Drainage 'Patterns, courses, and ponds 1 3 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodp ain areas 1 3 b) Slopes in excess of 25% 1 3 c) Unstable ground 1 d) Areas with high seasonal water table 1 3 j�+ 1 cap ) C] menu caner -e-- -.a^ neases w k - .50 —fee• 15 +s- /(46 U ;,14: eUi/ Vafr a are- eevie s-kd ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential f) having severely weak foundation soils 6) Location of resource areas as shown' on the Cornirehensive Map inventory ,including: a) Wildlife habitats b) Wetlands 7) Other site f eater rG a) Rock outcroppincjs b) Trees with 6° + caliper~ measured 4 feet from ground level B) Location of existing structures and their uses 9) Location aand .. . type, of on and off -site noise sources 9 10) Location of existing utilities and easements 11) Location of existing dedicated right -of —Wad► Site beVelop : 4Jan. sh,ow�.n (No, of copies , wr4www4r4. t.�w 1,� The proposed site and rrouhc; ing pr;oj e1'ties `Z) Contour line intervals 3) The location) dimensions and names of all: a) Existing & platted ;streets & other ,wblic ways and easements on the site and on adjoining t grope, "ties .3 ] APPLICATION CHECKLIST Page 1 1 Aisiviamormissr- b) Proposed streets or other public wiA s & easements on the site. ` c) Alternative routes of dead ens' or Proposed streets that require future extension 1 3 A) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site 1 3 b) parkin] and circulation :.areas C 3 c) Loading and services areas ( 3 d) Pedestrian and bicycle airculation ( 3 e) outdoor common areas, 1 3 f) Above ground utilities 1 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the s i,te 1 3 b) Proposed structures, improvements, util.itiea and easements on the site 1 3 6) Rtorm drainage facilities ant analysis of downstream conditions 7) sanitary sewer facilities 1 3 8) The` location of areas to be landscaped 1 3 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques r 1 10) The location of mailboxes 1 3 11) The location of all structures bard their OrifrIntation 1 3 12) Existing or prop 0 r d sewer reimbursement a,sireemerrts: [ 3 C) l P (Mo. of copies ! �) , n shall :i ' a grading plan at The site dr,��lapnn+�nt pia clucie the same rca1e as the site analysis drawings and sh contain the following information: tent to which gra g, will :ako �) The a iodic tin a eneral contain nes ;lope ratios place indicating .� and soil stabilization prop ls, and time of year it is proposed to be do. A statement from a r istered engineer supported by data factual sU anti:ating a) Subsurf. P r exploration and geotechnical en " t erin report validity .g y of sanitary sewer and storm b) �. drainage service proposals c) That all problems will be mitigated �n ,�• how they will be mitigated b) Ni ' .. - Drawings (No, of copies The site development plan proposal shall include 1) Floor plans indicating t he square footage of all structures proposed for use on-- ite; and 2) Typical el,evat5ion drawings of each structure: E) Landscape Plan (No. of copies .�.......,,.) fhe.landsr<ape plate shall be drawer at the same+ scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate 1) �eacrx p tion of the irrigation system where ere applicable 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings APPLIGATI01 ONEEf LIST —page L �J 2 C3 C3 1 3 , E �. 3 3 C 3 C3 3 ): Location of torrates, 'necks, shel'Vers, p1a,, areas and common open spaces ( 1 and t �i yies of exi..,ing and �) Location, type, size a proposed plant materials. C 1 The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses:. 1) Soil conditions. E 3 2) 'Erosion control measures that will be used. E 3 Sian �rawin� Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance vs.. 18.114 c,; the Code ae part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. E3 CO :Traffic 9eneratioh estimate C 3 P re 1 iminarl a► titio0 r r lot lines tment sa� showin ((No. of Copies 1) The owner of the subject parcel 1 2) The ed► agent owner's authorized g 3) The map scale, 20,50;100 or 200 feetb1), inch north arrow and of p de 4) Description parcel location and boundaries` C 3 5) 5 Location, width and names, of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel 1 6 ) Location of all perrianent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property line t 3 7 ) Location xon and width of all water courses r 3 $ Location of ny trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet abov ► ground level 0) All slopes greater than 25% 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements ,1 3 t1, For major land partition which creates a public street. `' a) The proposed right-- of—way location and width C I b) goal ed cross—section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip 12) Any applicable restrictions , � deed regtr�ct�ons 1 ) Eiidenee that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applic&tble t 3 I) ubd vis .on Pr'elimijjar: Plat. clap pad date, .showin (No, o Copies ):. Io �eScale equaling, 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch 1) Scale q .� and limited to one phase per sheet 2) The . proposed nam e of .. the subdi v" isioe 3) Vicinity map showing pro p erty' s rela ticeship to arterial and collector streets , p numbers : er nr►r as applicable 4) Names, addresses and tale' hone of the own developer, ea�ganeer, sr�rveyer, d�sag , 5) mite of application 6) Boundary' lines of tract' to be subdivided y 7) Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsukeli Tided land ity establhed a.nch- 6 Contocir" 1 fines related to y C " �- ma►r" • a1 s for 0 -10% grades greater .. k ai,, 2,- fc►rat == 2nteM^v' than 10 APPLICATION CIIFOKL z'ST — Page 3 � r 14( C, The Purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): [ ] a) Public and Private right-of-ways and ease(lnents Ea‹, b) Public and private sanitarY and storm sewor l'hnes E4=r„ c) DomeStic water mains including fire hydraots d) Major Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) 1 3 e) WatercoUrses ( 3 f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pattmaYs and other land encumbrances 1 3 Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanit.Ary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated rvl" Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants, Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyool the limits of the 5:,roposed subdivision, [i-1 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way; 14) The location of all areas subjett to inundation or StOl''M water overflow 1 9' 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water- courses and drainage ways 16) The proposed lot configurations, appro;pate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots [01 17) The location of 11 trees with a diamete:e 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any The existing uses of the Property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures and a statement of which structures are to remain after plattng F 19) Supplemental information including: ,/ a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) b) Proof of property ownership c) A proposed plan for Provision subdivtsion improvements 1 ] 20) Ktsting natural features '.ncluding rock ott cir'oPPihgs, Wetlands and marsh areas. ( 21) If any of the foregoing information cannbt PractitablY be shown on the preliminary Flab it shall he incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application. ( ] 3) Other Information b tt,(- *: • (2362P/0028P) APPL/CATION GHECkLIST -, Page 4 NOTIFICATION LIST P0! A1, APPLICATIONS 2.2,',7)0 tai. ' co yes CPO 0. trot' DF.P AS Puildi>,*g Official /Brad R. l tiY Retarder n9ineer3. q /Chtie D. Parf it& Coozdivator/Vi',.la Z`. SPECINB DI Piro DSt®tric t (Pick --trip bowl � i 1.7r9 eakd ifaterr District ';$7 77 $W Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 School Dig It E'o. Bea (Beaverton) 11)0 2A ,vdt►rtean, (1R 97075 ✓'" laboo1 Dist. 23.7 (leigaro 131137 'VII Paa,tfic liwy. Tigard, Olt 91'223 varit;; Water District 6501 SW Taylors Perry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 .tPI'ECI?ED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Tr&nap. 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 E.•'ent Curtis = 1l ovin Martin t+ 47g d Yt 6•4t Scott &uig Prod Eberle Mike Gorses= City of Beaverton Jim Bendsyr PO ';door 4755 Belaveer on, OR 97076 Citwt of Rig city WAIT qr 15300 SW 116th Xing city, 011' 072224 City of LAO Oswego _.._ 380 it tt gar A Liddy Ostiego, OR 97034 taus Highway Divisible Bob Doran PO tok 25412 'Portland, C 97225-8412 5. SPECLAI GENCIES -•,,, C anora1 Telephone R s 610113 460 SW Eisin St. , Tigard, 01 07223 @aW t9a t *r01 caw:. Scott Pa 1,i or 220 Ifni t 000nd £ e. POtt1and, bit 97209 � :r CI Cablev'inioa df Oregon 'H, , WLtks Ballack 00 SW Boni St. Po *1and0 OR 97201 coluShim Cable (Prank Stouts) 14209 SW Brigade n O. Beaverton, OR 970165 6. STATE ACE►4CIf1S _ AEiktiriiiutic, r1tw (o1 of ) Esaginear Achath 1ich 4 iiildlito Parke &f tieoreation rill. SOuhdi.vii loO Supervisor Energy Dept. Of E;aviron,, QuA1ity OtbkAAt ACE1f LIES Corps. Of Engihsera Pest O! five 0111E11 Soutbicra Pacific Transp n attion Company Dunn® ! Forney; fi'LS Project hnginder' 000 NN 6ti Avenue; R. 3240 UI \icon station Portland, 0A 97209 Boundary Coraiaaiin 320 tit! Stark Room 530 Portland, OR 97204 2000 SW iat ave. Port? '', PortUnd, CH 972P1.•33;98 DLO (CM'S . n1y) 1175 Court " t. i 6 Bales, CR 97310 -0596 • Other City of Durham City Manage.. M 171E WY Upper Boones Perry Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland Planning Director 1120 SW 5th kortlend, 011 97204 000'.0 Lidtieen Rebmann 9002,811 !'leLLougl tin Blvd.. Nilwaukie, 011 97222 Portland General Elbe. Brian Moore 34655 SW Old Scholia Pry. b•eesrton, OR 97001 .._, ,titveea C'ea>rnnu$zmtl:icazti Metro Jason 17enritt , t iiai oabea Technology Center 1815 Mid 169 eii Plc. 5 -6020 Deravertca, OR 97006 -468G EPS Went Petit Belv'an 4121 SW oak St. !Portland, OA 97204 1d'. • • Division of SCar[ Laadr. a6) old 3 i to t .g n® p t, Bask map d ��4"ac�t0e+j ezri LCOC sire 'F4alabr•l1 Other Other • ,iP WAS T0N COUNTY!� 133.43 600 5,09 °3dr !i 9°21 V 10L2 110 11x•56 W tl.27 2800 1 OO4 .074c 114 3302 400 08 Ac toiao 1 1300 $ 4800 SOO Ott ni° r�1 :°• 43 '6 w t k /a y J s . 4602 POINT:` A814 Ale. • 9 1.4 1991 Sid itorrimv POINT k.. ti 65 ate P.4.3 .4e. Aqtrifti RECErsPe0 DEC 17 199'? COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT recember 17 1992 TO: The city of Planning Dept. FROM: Craig A. Petrie RE: Request of Pre- application Conference Subject Property: Map #2S, 1W, 11)C W.M. Tax Lots 3300, 3400, and ,a. portion of Tax ]Lots 3600,' & 3601 1 am r•eguestt g a pre - application for a ten loa single family s ubeileisi ©n. The +oning is , q ,l 6 to allow .� - ---a 10 000 square foot zone. a variance o ►�r l�-3. 1 ���1 be requesting �e t� physical ical cc�r�stni"�. ! Other loin those lots to be approx. 9230 square feet in site due f. wgli be at least 10,000 Sq. Ft or larger. 1 Om on building a half street improveare `t or1 S.W. 14th from Cherry Street to the north edge e of TL 3400 and ,buildin a fill street with a haranot head or, a bulb north from Cherry Ste between tax fats 3200 and 3302. On this �i� will be proposing a right awry of 40 i'..e since this is Ol th property operty available able section 1 this location. AO utilities are available. There aro are no wetlands, no a gnifii rant natural features, the property is flat to very �� entl sloped , aid 411'0 existing house which is on a septic s s ' 'Trry y i up 8 -��� � -� � .. in ���,,.� W.y Street, and the storm end r The � . %lido a tern will be hooked u to s ��ier. �� anai�e is sanitary lies moire at Ate S.' . ct rner of to lot 4800 � , y vacated by the city which �►'as r�e�,;�.ntl but in the process retained ined a utility easement across that area. Thank you for your tine. Sincere!; years, Craig A. ' e le 9600 S.W. apitol Highway Portland Oregon ► 7219 246 -7977 OR 701=. -0070 1LP CITY OF TIGARD PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE PROPERTY LOCATION 1/4) TAX NAP & TAX s eR/4 16— PETRI E-- DAI lle- ......-a<1.2r5.3.64P00, 3 40,I, 3790 NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): �aasTfa? GS S LEZoac C M as c R ° s4_11®A?J 1 b Der eAtiv ° pUEa cily,, 2 ti �1A j� M T" 4 ie� t�J df "dNG> S �1 PROPOSAL DESc RIPTf f: r LOT . i,f8 v/ 5/041. c OMPRENENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ._ OP' 1 1 , 7 6L ; RED 5 . r t9,u e'7 ZONING DESIGNATION: NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION 1. CHAIRPERSON: 416 Pk/ . PHONE: s ` 2 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL E Minim-am lot size: % Minimum lot 'width: Setbacks: front , side ,r ft., rear . �1 ft. garage „;, gl_ ,17!?. cornea _If_ ft. from both streets. Maximum site coverage: ,. JL% Minimums landscaped or natural vegetation area /Ji l.% Maxim= building height: ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIR7MENT5 partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet v 1 ese lot is created through the minor land minimum of /5 feet of fry: ntage or have a minimum 15 foos wide access easeWent. Mas it um lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. `REMENTS ft, SPECIAL SETBACKS t -- _""�,. 4 :°e-ef bow .. I. Ow+ �-, i��A�acssls. 3. t .]��...l.t- ,--- -- - -a��; e-Iti�EL�'tk:@.``'s', s, . _ ..... _ d,¢�'�' Flag lot t 10 foot aide yard ifietback. ' Zero 1ot line lots: iuinimu iu 10 foot aepa ration betoten buildings. . y . '� al bntildng ®spar feet 5 ft o aainaum setback frc�i► a +ion: See wile Section 183.55.030. Acceeao iatruc ua�ee up to 528 square e .de and rear lot lined. Accessory structure up to 1600 eg, ft, on parcele Of at leant 2.5 acr46 in size a, See applicable zo ing dietriot eetbacke for pi iaric4ry atruetMroa • • of • FLAG LOT Maximum BU'lLDgNG HEIGHT PROVISIONS e�toriee or 25 feet, whichever �.® less in most sense; 21.12 stories or 35 feet in R-7, R -i2 a R-25 or R -40 zones if etaludanrdc of Code Section 1$.9.030(B) are met. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION Community Development Code Chapter 7 . ea that the net y -*® 3 P ,�8� 92 specifies residential units allowed on a particular site may be calculated by dividing t)'4a not area of the developable area hy the minima's numbet of pp g district. n Hate feet rasp iar�:�l per dwelling unit in the applicable zc�nin�. diet by subtracting the following land N�� development Errant the gs:a�Aad aite area: b sub ;,ire a�', 1. All aena£tive lands area land within the 100 year f1oodplain - slopes exceeding 25% drainagmway® 2. Land dedicate for paari, purposes 3. Public right -of -way dedication 4. All land provided for private streets (includes a ccennwayo through parking areas) The city of Tigard allows a residential density transfer of up to a15% of the units that could otherwise have been developed on sensitive lands areas liar ted in C1) ahova to the developable portion of the site LA accordance) with Code Section' 15.92.030. It is this reesponeibility of the applicant; 'fora residential development application to provide a detailed calculation for both the permitted 444 residential density and the density t ansf ®r. E 41.9/ 46 emve, i4 lou r-- » `shun td 61 4"7' $, Z RESIDENTIAL D ;NSITY TRANSITION Regardless of the all property within 10O f -- t developed at a de .city Comprehensive Plan de ..� • d housin of a des gre on denei gn in a zoning ing district, any at. dished, area shall not be than 126 percent of the maxiMum ; of zoning) of the and) a+ ent parcel. AESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT sow ACCESS REQUIREMENTS are subject to solar rracc ®s ANTS All subdivisions and minor partitions s requirements which state that 90% of all lots cre ted must be on need for solar accessibility. The characteristics of a solar - oriented lot are high levels of wintertime nun striking the south wallas asd roofs of the house' house orientation maximizing south vIndOw aisles.; and a :south -sloping roof area. To adhi.eve this, one may utilize the following _ ae Sasic requirement: Lots With ra least a 90 foot north-maatth lot dimension and a front let line orientation within 30 degrre4 of an east -went axis, b; protected Solar Builsing Sine: The Sesser building itho iuuet a) be oriented within 30 degrees of east -west, b) be a mil:Li:duo of 70 feet from the middle of the left .tes the south® o) be a Midimtvm of 45 felit from the northernmost buildable 'boundary of the aubjeet lot C. Performance Optionst .... The first option require? ohs h0uae to be oriented within 30 degr�eeaa of an east west rani and have at Jenaet S0% of the ground floor ° s *oath wall protected from shade. The second option rectiree that at least 32% off? the g'latte add 5d0 aciPare feet OlE the roof area face 'south and be protected frost ohado 'Page 2 •pr Gsr3' • Total or partial exeaaaption of a .o .te from the solar access be approved for the following reason aI - Rest, west or north srl® pe s steeper than 20 %. - Off -site shade aourcea (structtres, vegetation, top,ogr zpby ), - On-site ahade sources (vegetation) A4 juatments allowing a reductiwi of the can be made for the following reasons: - Reduced density or an increased coat of at least five percent due to either. * east, west or north slope greater than 10 %, * significant natural feature, * existing road or lotting pattern, * public easement or right -'of way. -- Reduction in important development amenities. - pre- existing shade (vegetation) Mg a ;,,,an t are 'le i _.__ , .: dare ta. ashes �i ha. , - A o ent _corn 1�. es a�th -,� the a ®]la, d e3.c ►, tan ®n 'ta, or that specific lots should be exempted or adjusted out. The following items' shall be .., analysis: included in the a naa a. The north-south lot dimension and front lot line orientation of each proposed lot; protected solar Wilding Liners and relevant building site rep trictions L if applicable; For Cle purpo��'e of identifying trees elated to etemption requests, a reap showing existing trees at least 30 ;feet tali and over 6 inches dia aetei at a point 4 feet above grade, incluiing their height, diameter, and species, and stating thy -, <' they ale to be retained; and d. Copies of all private restrictions r , .atin+ to solar access. requirement can solar lot design requirement PA NG AND ACCESS Required automobiles pass sing: t -per & ll ng unit. -one covered parking space per unit requixed to-with more than ' drooma -multi fam require arking spaces per un 25t of required spaces may be designated compact -only spaces Standard parking apace dimensions: 9 ft. is 18 ft. Compact parking space dimensions: 3,5 ft, X 15 ft. oiaandicappss9., parking f vpropr »ately located mihiimum r lMb6r of 'handi apped parkin 1-- 3ng areas providing Shall provide designate` d handicapped parking spaces. The spaces to be rovided and parking Disabilities act teee a , ace symbol shall he painted on the iate sign shall be provided. Mendatell tb space size are andout s ace handicapped parking handout). Pac surface and an appto Bicycle racks are requited fo multi afami3.y r ®aidential developments. Bicycle 47 ac ke shall be fora n areas rotect ®a from automobile traffic and in cOnvenient locations Page 3 M• w All parking area 410 and driveways must be paved. Mxsni*4um accea® width: IP maximum access width Pedestrian trian access must, be provided between building entrances and g,trking' areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks wal and streets. A minimum of one tree per eeev ,king ePac ea must be planted in and around all parking areas i -a- ca no''y a °1ioet a Landeoaped screening of parking areas £ro ' iewe from public r3.ghst•oL -w ay mug be provided. Ocala) 40ir pivrxte. 6-isvef, 4‘vaikytts up -to For parking areas and acceoees � see Community o Development charmers 16106~ and 18.108. „°....rte The Cit AREA that clear vision area be Maintained between three and eight feet above grade at road/driveway, road /railroad. and road /road intersections. The else of the required clear vision area dspende upon the ablating street' a functional claaeifica* ton. 8Ui'FERING SC EENiP In order co in 'ease privacy an visual impact between adjacent deve land lases, t e clty require® la!ndeca peri.naeters. Required buffer areas are width. 8u felt araati must be occupied eve g �t roes t ee and ®htu and mu st achie • hcrotontal p], legso Site obscuring a :re in dome caeeiu an . �, eV buffet area array only be occupied fay vege o reduce or eliminate adverse noise or psi nta, especially between different • =d buffer areas along certain . . eecribed by the Code ink by a mixture of - a balance e f obu and en virtical and eeYl`d aia area also required n if not required. Reqpirad ati on, 'gei*ce s, utilities, and ralkWaaye' Add °" s may be found in Code Ohapt i r i� � nu f e.,t3r area �. mater al , -; and Sizes Required buffer Wwydths applicable! to yo prop ®alai area: ft. along north boundary ft. along eOUth horaaidarr' ft , along east boundary nda y ft. along YAitist boundstY In addition sight obsburin keening is required along wpm :s •••••' - woawgirorLr+n ,..� ate. Page 4 • • • eE4 • Ulo LANDSCAPING Street trees are reed for all".444,7016pments fronting on a public or p1:I.ee'aate street and f driveways e than 1 fligt in. length. Otre'st trees must be placed either within th c right- 4of -way or on private ProPerty within six, est of the ri x. • , . -war boundary® Street trees mwdt have a minimum ca].i r of r feet above grade. Street ... , � i�,eaa<t at /�� trees should be spaced t O e 1t part depending on matu :'e tree oimo Further information on regulations ;. ffea:tin j str eb trees a hd a list of racammended street trees may be o! , ivied from the planning Division. SIG =S e,e Pe g y sign in the City of Tigard. A idolinee for Sign bVer�aita' handout upon erecting a3ra �.a available u n r ®aart. Additional sign are or height bo and Code standards may ba permitted if part the ei r�r props ®aai ® re;wi.o as of a development Q`* 3TC'od 'LANDS provides unsuitable Code Chapter 18.84 roes ides regulations for. lands potentially for development due to areas within the 100 -year f loodplain, natural drainagewaye, wetland areas, on elopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Sltaf f will attempt to preliminarily identify aensitiV lands areas at ..the pre- app1i.caation conference ce a available le information. However, the res nethilit reels 1 dentif ae it lands areas and _ t oi.r b®undVLr®aa, ie the resa�xsnaeihlity. of. the a pl..ca�ritj Area ®, �!'nr�etin the de ,..:. f vena l e lands 4111A cl aarl indicated on a e submitted wits; a develo aemit �„�►,,,pi is « ` Chapter 18.84 provides regulations for the use protection, protec i s t i or modification of sensitive lands areas. pm prohibited . within flood 1 ty f e �� a�e3, dedication of 100-year f lAOdpla3h areas to the City for park an( open apace areas is required ggi a condition of approval of a development application. ......,, itWAY ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS ;moo &e c my BE.:.: mere-55/4,o p PLAmo a®� 7 fcs5 O d► e V Me 27M,►JG /79.,e. T 7)-1-EeJ _ . I/ aVQ E- V E Vic. A-NNED : � vetGPfrf ti,'7'' is 5174 bA-r' Pegs <ta4 empfrievrs % PD hdnainistrative staff review Public' hearing before the Lands ' ` Oe Hearings Of ficer- *e *,c hearing before the Planning isaion. Public hea�Mtng ��One Planning Commiss,ion with the he Saeion ma'zng a r t iaiendatiora on the + ropOsal to than City Counci L. A0dther public hearing is hexd by the City council. All appliCatient must be accepted by ,a P .inning Division staff giber at the: knit r Devela nt bepart�1t coOr:ter at City Nall .0ateion, a pme' ceaunt�r with Out Planning ` ttiion o ed9 . wail or dropped off At the acceptance away be returned. Applications Submitted after 4:30 P.M4 on Th reday will be batched for Processing l .th the following, weok' a alicati Ohs fog Zsooeasetng. No applications will be accepted after 3:00 � A1. on rridayi or 4:30 on other days. Ida, s eu ,,a� tt,ed wit a�n cep, al c ljam► a b LAWRIA �ppqy��w�a�►N to sw..�•.....rr r�rn�:+ .,r � • uR awu �riirrr it ahee. one 8.5 rich *.:. 11 inch ma . - a► gr gad zoo ouild� abed fare at a hac ,p t�a,�the e�t�ag•'; se tt or �.otratj.v ®d . e�,on . The Planning Divieiori and Engineeirit g Di rieion will. do a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application La complete wLthn 10 days of eubn►ktta1. Staff Will notify an applicant if additional information or copies+ of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative a deal ®ion /public hearing tygically l l occur approximately t y ® Applications application accepted Will complete by the Planning Division. involving difficult Lae uea or requiring review by other jurisdictions Way take addition time to eview. Written decisions are issued within 10 days of the hearing. A 10 be heard by the 11 deutaienna ' An appeal on this matter would day appea3. parted i'ollows ye .,, .,.� .... A basic flow d agna�► illustrating the review process �® ava�lab ll e from the Planning Pivi ®ion. The pre - application conerence and the heteS of the conference ale +e inteY; ded to inform l':the pro©pecti.ve app cant Of the primary Community DevelopMent Code requi.tements applicable &w l of a particular sit® and to allow the staff dprospective PP i t to diecUse the opportunities aid, constraints affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot over all Code requirements and aspects of good rate plaarling that should apply to the development of your :site plan. Failure of the staff to provide infcim Lion required by 4.he Coder shell not constitute a `waiver of the applicable Standards or rriguireraents. I& id recommended that a proepoctive applicant either caul twin and read the Community DeVeloptOent Code or ask any gAdatione of dfty staff relative to . .. Code reqUitements prior to submitting an a pp lication y Another prea.app1ication conference i® r�nqu� red if an app c ate be a.. t 1� PP liosa id znE� �� �e uesii3t the ��eecon an six moaataa �tftex this ge 16 �tbiy d conference ie deeianed tineeceee the Piailnitiig bacviaion PREPARED BY: PLANNING DI SIGN PHONE: 639-41V1 Page 6 r. d PUBLIC PZ' CILITIB ,t Who purl; poe a of the pre - app1icatie. a conferee me is to 3 iii) identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinan :e pr€,nvieloms= (ti) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on !specific concerns are ( t pp tn review process o with the applicant including identifying who ill be the al decision ker for the application. The extent of neceseery public improvements rid di dicetione to be required of > the applicant will be recommended by City otaf f and approved by the appropriate authority. There will be r,o finel recommendation to the decision maker by City staff u itil all ec amaenti eg agencies;, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to rewtew and comment on the application. The following comments are a projeztion of peblie imptovement related re uire ent a that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proect. �iahtpe,f ;av► dedkcati.onr The City of Tigard mares that Land area be dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights, og- .wary to the ultimate functional street classification rights -of eway width specified by the Community Development Code or to create new etreetri.' Approval of a development application for this site will require dedication of eight -c.E -way for: ./LA. to 2 i'°JQU� 'ru� lief C to tree t , improveme I 74 1 ...Z./AL a treet prove eats will be n cesear y along '��, E ^ r 2.41 street improvements will be neceseary along 3. Street improveMents will include ".,.__._._ feet of pavement feet from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of feet from centerline. feet from centerline. Pv' a.5 b es�f- po5s'►l'_ utility wires (in moat cases. Alternatively, a fee is collected) , a fives- foot wide sidewalk (may be wider on arterials or major collectoea)r necess at y street signs, streetlights, and a two ye ,..treetlighting fee. 711-14. TO R4 F -r-. o 44vr In some eases where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical the street improvements may be deferred. In these cases, as a condition of development approval, the property owner (e) must execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waive® the property owner's right to remonstrate against the foruation of a local Improvement district formed to improve: 2. P geiteianweysibikewavas Sainch i.i.aie located aim ®. �° loses ®t � a � Via` ®eeer to thin property an innitary sloaat ..�.�.�...�. ProPosed development MU St be connted to a sa et' ...j fewer. It id the dev'el d .. t ac sponbility to extend the sewer alttn he proposed develbeOth A e' e amonawammanomor No, "MOW • Page 7 �.1 'ester Su 1 The �..} , 6R k water District (phone: W -�- C -. ) r ides is water nerves L in Area of this site. The District Provides hozldl be contacted for inforn*ati On tir ar,di:n waster N��1 for g �► yraur . propOsedl development. Fire protections. Tualatin Valley Fire and Reaane lbLatVi ct (Contacts Gene 3irehilT, 545 -5533) provides fire protection servi' 8 within the city cif` ard,► The District should be contacted for iragerrmatien regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: StorrnL Aetwier or IMBE t s imialaisasoorm-peiamoi ..o._.. STORKWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency hawk esta lIished and the City has agreed to enforce,, Resolution Ube 90.43, Surface Water Managemeut Regulations, rtmgniring the construction of on -eit& water quality facilities or fees in 1teu of their construction. The revolution regiree that a fee all: $/01: oonetruction of a water quality facility be built4 The tee is bmeed os the amount of impervious surface; for every 2640 square feet oz portion thereof, the fee shall be $2861.00. The,a Cit,. of Tigard determines if a fee or facility shall ee bdilt.:, e TRAFFIC n 1990, Washington County county-wide Traffic impact , adopted ac fee � crunra�a will o�allQete� £raa�Tne ) ordinance the Traffic Impact pogo w development baa►ed on the development's pro eated impact on tho transportation System. Developing properties will be required to pay !� y on the number of trips they are projected to generate. The T1p Is calculated based on type of U(e, site of project, and a general: use bases; fee category. payment Of the CIF �a a b ®��a g Permit limited 9 ry allowed to issuance. lfn l��e TIp shall be calculated at ins.= o � be deferred until issuance of occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. STREET PERMIT Norwork within a public right-of-way shall commence until ti 1 the applicant hae obtained a street, opening permit f om the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR EtE *ATIONs on g it proecta that require grading plan, the applicant shall ubmit with the grading p a yp al toe plan for ehish lot which shall have the elevatione elevations of four r.orners of that plan a ?.z ag with elevations at the corner of each lot. JO: p....NEP. MST PD.EPF fED P2 V. ENGINEER/NG G DIVISION P LONE s 639 -4171 Page a momarinswrimaismarsi rio • • .r. Staff Date i;k. CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items : on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements: This checklist identifi.* what is to be submitted with your application. This sheet U, be brought ur any; submitted with all other materials at the / ion of these sub it our application. See your application for further expladr call Planning at 639-4171. ITEMS T BE INCLUDED ®ASIC MM#TRRIALS A) Applacat3on form (1 copy). R) owner's signaturaa /wr .tte % n uthorization " '-C) Title transfer • xnstrume! •�. n --.D tstes er's• mad .Cq. E) Piot. or site pin 7.L1 ` A 1 e ,'tnt' s s ta►tement ) PP ,.. (H) HriliOg .fee ( ---- 62 + ,IgL ...D %$ 4iIV f ► Vavus C ' • $ t vc. veg ge S�c.4 SPECIFIC MATERIAS .17 6 A) Site I0formatxcn` showing (Iilo of copies y'• 1) Vicinity Mp 2) Site size &; d,meelsions L I.. r. lanes 2 f t at O--10% or.•' 5 ft for. grades > p:4):.• C 3 ntou + 3 �o ( ) ds C � 4) Dralnago patterns, courses,•'and pon 5 - 1 hazard are s •i.nciuding . ) lc��atxons of natur�a C Food 1 innexce�,s p b) Slopes ss of 25 c U.nstak le ground 1:1 g. d) Areas w►xth •hx h Seasonal water. •table t 3 e) Areas with severe 6) soi y•erosion.pottent�a3 l (]. •-f ) Areas hauan g sever e1y weak foundaion sois • Location o resource areas as showb on the Comrrehensive Mara inventory inc1,Udirvg • a) Wildlife habitats 3 b) Wetlands CJ 1 Other site featuresa • a) Rock •outcroppings. 1•:•.1:: h) Trees with 6" •+ caliper• measured eased 4 feet from ground 1eve1 • 8).• Location of existing structures and. their uses E:..3. 0) Location and type of on and off •ante noise soUrces 1 . •10) Location of 6AXisting utilities and easements t 3 11) •-t.ocati n of enisting dedicated right of -Ways [ 3 8) Site 64.v elor, ismn Rlara shov�xq t n (�Ia 4 of �Ox� ) 1) The poposed site and surroundingp roprties 2) C®ntoiar line intervals C a 3) The iocation), dimensions and names of ail: xc w ) & l;atted streets & other pub1. ays a Caaistirc� p and easerneflts an the site and on adjoining 1 • properties • f PPL CATION. * 0Ec LIs1 Page 1 own b) roposed streets or other Pub1iys & easements on the site. i c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed p... i �. 3 streets that require future extension 4) The ` location and dimension of: the site a) Entrances and exits cn b) Parking and circulation areas 3 c) Loading and services areas C 3 d) Pedestrian and biIPycle circulation, 3 e) Outdoor comon areas, 3 f) Above ground utilities ; 3 5) The location, iiimens ens & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the sit/ and on adjacent 25 ent propaap'ty within feet of the site h) Props ed structures, '::.inprove3.�flts, utilities and ease►aents on the site 6) Storm drninage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7) Sanitary sewer 8) The location f areas to be landscaped g) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention technique 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orien ►,4ti.or 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements � Grading, Pla n (No: of copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and sh contain the following extent era ' g will � 1 take 1) The location and ' place indicating etneral contou Ines; slope ratios and soil stabilization prep ls, and time of year it is proposed to be do. 2) from a r: xstered engineer supported by A statement from ant�.atin�l data factual /s a) Subsurf�: exploration and geotechnical en eering report b) of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service vice proposals c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be ngitigated �1) ' q��h�tect ural �rauin g (N o • of copies The site development pla nproposal shall include: 1) Fl oor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on sit ; and tu 2) Typical elevation draWings re, Landscape .plan (No, of copies ): C 3 The landsca e Plan shai be drawn The ,�.. .: _ �: the same scale of the � wn at th : p ry and shall site analysis plan car'' a larger scale if ! necessary indicate . `.. 1) ipt�c�n of the irrigation ��ystem where applicable E a� 1 �escr ..... 2) Location and height of renceso buffers and screen). ( 3 APPLICATION CHECKLIST 'age C, .4 3) Lo on of terre es, decks, shelter lay area a common ckpen 1paces ( 3 4) Location, ty pe, size and species of existing and Proposed Plant r terials • t 3 The landscape plan Thad include a Oorr =ative which addresses: - 1) Sail conditions. E 3 2) Erosion control aea %ores that will be used. ( 3 p) Sig n drawings shall be submitted in accordance with � with Chapter s 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Rewiew or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ 3 Traffic c alneratlon estimate r 3 ) �,.�.. ; ___��__. ,._....�.j ► ►�a shoain Prel xmx ustmeni ;,.�,�...�. ,1 ofnGoyxesrt3txon .�►re lot: line ad (o• ) 1) The owner of the subject parcel t 3 2) The owner's authorized agent E 3 C =1), inch nooth 3) The map scale, 20, X0,100 car 200 feet= 1), and date C 3 4) bescription of , parcel location and boundaries E 3 5) Location, Width a�, streets, easeme and �d names of other public,: was within and adjarwent to the pw6 ne1 ( ] 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of X11 property lines � ] 7) Location and width of all water courses t with 6" or greater caliper at 8) Location of any trees eatep c�a1 4 feet above ground level ( ] 9) All slopes greater than 257 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements t 3 11) For major .l d partition cinich creates a p;.ublliictstreet: ) ar art a) The proposed right—of -moray location and [ 3 b) A scaled cross— section of the proposed street plus an) reserve strip [ ] 12 ) Any An applicable deed restrictions ( ] 13) evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable 1 3 nPre:: :. r.F ,iabdiva.sio � � xm'�nary Plat �1a�s ands data �Mo�rihg(No i) Scale equaling 30,50,/00 or 200 feet to the inch I) and limited to one phase per sheet 2) The • proposed name . o " subdivision re labor �hir to � 3) Vicinity map showing property's p f the subdivision .� arterial . ia1 'a►nd collector streets C 4) Names. adores. P.. ...;��� ner as � .. jes and telephone numbers of the owner developer, c;ngineer, surveyer, d g , pl icable( 5) Data of application C 6) BoundarY .ones of tract to be subdivided 7) Names of adjacent subdiv lion or nemesiof recorded owners of adjoining R.' .. ' un ' and - d la 8 tour lines related to a City e,tablished bench- mark at 2 -foot interval, o r 0--10/ r' � grades r�reate 10% a es than APPLtcATWN CHGCKLI7rr1 -- arse Y .• • Th rpose, location, type and size all of the fcs. owing (within and adjacent to the proposes )ubdPiv sion) o t bl. c and rivate rig ht --of ys and easements ��, b) Public and private sanitary , and storm sewer lines c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) Water+course. Dec reservAtions for parks;, open spade, pathways p; ° , of proposed d other land eecun,��rances APProsianate plan and roof it.►� p oposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades a� 4d pipe sizes indicated Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the to #ration of valves and fire hydrants. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a Bbl y the proposed reasonable distance beyond the limits of th sate cross . � sections of proposed street right—of—way; ; C l�-'' 11 The llocation of all areas subject to inundation or storm water of flow 15) Location, width of all _ courses and drainage ways 1 lot ig ions, approj` mate lot /^�,� The proposed lot configurations, urat dimensions and lot_ numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes of her than residential, it shall indicated upon such lots 17) 'The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or ----1„, greater feet above ground level, - and teeter measurs�c� at 4 f ,fr. the location of proposed tree plantings, if any 18) )The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the strisctures, and a statement of which struetures are to remain after platting 19) Supplemental information including: a � Proposed deed eed res trictions (if any) ) (VI) proof of property ownership . r A propo ed plan for provision of subdivision im P roeements 20) 8nisting natural features including rock out- croppings, wetlands and marsh areas. 2t) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a .narrative and submitted with the appication, tion (9ther y aair , .tc o ;t aCu ;iC water -- 2362P/0028P) APPLICATION CIHECI LIST = Page 4 � 11 • Its no case, shall th ' design of the a ce drive or drives require facilitate the becnward ' ov , t Queer , Maneuvering of a ve e within a streete ether than a : allot; and • Service drives for 1t .-farr lr dwellings shia ll be fully 2 droved with herd serfage pavement nth a igittimum ' 4tdtN of: • When accommodating tw-war'trelif f . , 24 f ee�ti , or . When accemmodatiag on6414hy traffic , 15 feet. f,,0'd. 89-06: Ord. 84.41; Ord. 83.-52) .mw.ic+aae; a.revse®aar AnAi"TT� o :s 18.111.070 . Ri _. ..����.- `.+"MOr"i�* s e .�Ai �« %�a41it VAli N alai acne s0 and egress for . stnqle -f ly', duplex a$taehs4 ingt, E .. i1 dwelling unfit s em individual lots, residential uee, • shall iet he Issas that he fo:11owint r, ber ifirizora der �1�% L I./manilas of 9P i/if1M19d t1i a iFr, �i�1Ci7 t Utiit /Lots Required Access a V ,dt idt i 15 ° 10'' >.5 10''4 30 24 (curbs_ mad wt 1ki+ay ,�� Beres t h ►11 b� provided and inn *ac: ned in 1 a cordanddet ith tkAe ProviS .ons Of Section 10.207 of the 4 tri ' ®rat Fire a Code Y a ACc eSs drives in excedS or 150 feet in 7"'th shill be provided $0i. h a VPvoved Prolr cn for t h. turninzt around of fire apparatus by one o f the f e 1 eving 1 • k ,evel, clrcl tare abed surface °, having , a minimum turn tabus " 6 ^ a�Ass r•,red fr �e,�te ®��rei� to ent�1de edge ot 45 . A i�,u'fit.ad e paved surface with ., w t level � hammerhead conf � F, Paved . e�a�c� le of e i _.-m► h end hem �, .,. , a minimum . ,�g p� 40 feet and a in fl idth of 20 feet. Vehicular access glad eg gs fOr y residential uOdd shall sot be less then the kollowitist • It. 3i is►r 02/2/'0' • 10i aydx,!�^i �. . • pale 2r G •. offi 0. > � -. .. a tIr CT Fl Rte_ `VI LADE I CONDOM! NIU1 •s= o; ),74th A - CONS TRUCT RET SG WALL - 2; D I SEE AIL, Si-i _ = DEFLECT- R:U E. 'AR U ` I►Al _L UNDER- SIDEWALK S.D. Lfi E "III SW 75TH CT SW CHERRY -DR. 2.63 . P *H • RyU.E. RAMP DROP 1 ST &LL (8 BOXES, 6'X6' P1i LAC UT LUTY EASEMENT alo =TA, 2 +76.80 LINE 3 STA. 0 +0.97 RT 2.00'. =:r4 212.29_ 1 S.D. IIIT.111 SD .K - STA ,0+99.97 'UNE :1i STS► ►_- 6+30.01 RT 2.0 RIM 212.8 CB * M (MAINTAINED BY 'HOMEEIWNERS 0 +4e.0 RT 11 T.G. = 21a7S E. = 211.78 S = SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET 3.55 F 8' C -900 GRATEMASTER CI310-48H88 OR EQUIVALENT REMOVE EX»ST1NG GRAVEL DRIVEWAY.. WITHIN CORNER RADIUS AREA SLAB CONSTRUCT 2'-° -A.C. PAVED DRIVEWAY. - SIDpa' ALK Ritivw5j, • To ;BE CONSTRt!C ED- AT TIME CF ,INITIAL STREET CONSTRUCTION EXISTING RESIDENCE Z EXISTING GRAVEL = DRIVEWAY C ASTRUDT DRAINAGE , BLC.IOUTS :& .INSTALL DR 4-i4 E TO LOTS -5 :& STA 0+41:71 RT 12S - INSTALL. DEAD. Et ) SIGN S -04 -93 8-17--93 09- 1.O —S3 PROJECT [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]