The URL can be used to link to this page

SUB1993-00007POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. ^rvi+pj,;�rn iCo&1. Oard Hi &roal.e.. 34,10021- U'ftlV;'',t••w*RI A «" Keri Waymire Waverly Construction P.O ,. Box 230096 Tigard, Oregon 97224 Subject: Waverly Estates Ken, In response to your letter of October 24th, and our previous telephone conversation regarding the rercv al Of a dead or dy g tree an the tree preservation area, the City will allow the tree removal and would not require a permit for this work. If you have any additional questions regarding thil3 work, please contact WM IT/Andrea in the Planning Departnesnt. Sincerely, t.etha Thomas Construction Inspector c: Bill Monahan Will D'Andrea Project File 13125 SW I-1011 Blvd, Tidr,�rdj OR 97223 r (5(J3) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684-277 WAVERLY CONSTRUCTION BOX 230996 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 Phone: 503 620 7035 Fax 503 '620 5124 Dates Oct 24, I996 IIei j itates reservation area 3r e Leek Thomas City of Tigard Engineering 13125 S. W. Hail Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 The owner's concerns about the tree we contacted you about previously have developed to the point that we have determined the correct course would be to remove the tree before it comes down and damages one or more of the houses, If rwe don't hear anything from you to the contrary before November 10, 1996, we will have this done. If we need a permit or anything foram* from the City, will you let us know. cc: Bill Monahan City Manager file :winworditreelet,dot/ Roberta War Waverly Comtrnction Company 31835 SW Country View Lane Wilsonville; OR 97070 Dear Mrs. Way a e: Thank you for your letter of arch 15, 1995. 1 hope I can clarify the intent of our past communications. The letter received the 13th of March mailed iled only in follow up of our 1 believe .1h ^ letter was received late p . �ry�`1 y4 to in the telephone conversation of .i��rlrh 7. an error mfg address. The City inspected the signage protecting ds that they r, r..r .. .... ..� SUB �. r .� . ,. the wetlands �n � Supposed to b+�. s Condition #24 of SUB 93 -0007 subdivision Hearings a was pp sr<an appr�v a signage was su 'car to issuance of building permits according to the s Final Order. provided � le development in Compliance from a plying p: s ective. Now that it has been �c�rn��.:t�d, the deyelu sent: is Thank you for your taronipt response in this matter. If you have any further questions,, please feel free to co;ritact me at (505) 639 -4171 x315. Sincerely, rill' ]'Andrea: As oistar!t Planner cc. Dick Bey ?ersdoiff i 13i11 Monahan File hAroginWil(t rnyinie t2,lot 13125 SW Hall Blvd I'igcrrcl, OP 97223 (503) _ 639-4171 MD (50 3) 684 -2?72 To: . A D° eta Assistant F(ian ner City of Tigerd 131 ,' . ' i'. Ha Blvd. Tigard, Oft ° 72Z3 t5CEIVE D MAR 161995 COMAtitiftillY DEVELOPMEti saao<eyih 15„ 1995 Re: y o u r letter of Merin 1:1, 1995 see W a y rIy Estates Via Fax and Regular man. Deem k'r. Ds" ,a on Hard 1, you collect ale wee U rid "�+ae ls' 'Inge lay leas eon Friday, Mph 1 j had been re- quired. Ila aay latter to Le :k lea Mho ,l :a r ' GS a s the aside 4 the punch list, I nehtised her that requirement (No. 6) Voulal b dine on Frad =,y . The sa to a was installed in the forenoon on Friday. 0 t o 13th you wrote We us that poerm sunitd d he e sav ende o "f df :, le la;aa has not been s led". Since w�et9�ea now, for s�aa�e reason, no they do not for the ��-� -:.; � do not l��o�+ ills i� g y moat your a + pr ►v l as to saga, type, location n installation; whether no one c e out and Iotter was written don spec' on the theory JRr,e rA were not it to eal; whetluir amp "ceded ne was male; or so a a other re on. In aro event, we do not ow now whether or not we ere a compliance with cpegificati ► ns we are unaware of; whether or not a hold is plumed on buld ai pen aits, whether or not ,'e steed to saatlmait a playas floe compl enee of something Can you sa it f'en ;;;:e RO OL W Srffdee Wavy CasuittruthAtun Ian 31835 S W. Coirett riem WnnYnl,e, OR 970,0 U,tav0n rdIeltyti Y L c6Jf o: E zhheth Yt ii!t, Seiler, Yeats e $ ioti h lh, City Ivianagot err �w �•i� iii ° A _. ___ J Jr'�_ .'a .-11 JEFFREY A. E3 WEIFBSO)f MARA O. COTTLE 1 ?CNAI.::+ J. EKMAN GREGORY C. NEWTON* Is City of Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard, Oregon File NO SUB 93 0007 /SLR 93 0034 RAI Applicant Waynu.z e Greetings: MY name is Mark Cottle and I am an attorney in the law firm of E�,q� w� yy�y & w r OX We have been retained by th Thomas' who own the �ilB�iWAffd88 � ��YU �r rf. e�id+/1 Q� ... � ' E9 Bub—division s dairy fad that adjoins the applicants proposed There are several issues t have be ,-n asked to address in the hearing with regards to the applicant's proposed subdivision. iof APPLICANT'S EARRA►a`'IVE FOR SUB- DIVISION The n= rrative suggests that erosion control. ea;�ures will be imp/emented in the area. What iran't addressed, is that the code does not specify, that erosion is allowed. The codes state that any development or land form alteration "will not result in erosion in str sedi entatlon ® ground instability, or other adverse on-sit or off-site effect, or hazards to life roperty° 18.84.040. fe �r implement programs �� narrative s��-. = toss that it question will how much erosion are A licant'' s3 narra designs to address erosion. Our guest they anticipating. It is apparent that they are anticipating �t purchasing and paying ,for the en¢ugh erosion toarra' g y g installation of an erosion fence at the bottom of the deVelopmen t The code does not state that ... ._ erosion ion ' s ll be mitigated or minor erosion allowable but that any develop ment will not reoult in erosion." re than simply quote the city The narrative does a little mIo. l with the code. city code and the makes a reply that it will comply particular costaof�rss�a is the effects of the proposed sub- division on they off -site p�' peaty owned by the Thomas'. EKMAN OWE, SOX ATTORNEYS Al LAW $50 L tAC0LN T0W R 10260 S. M. GREENEURG F34a'^ PORTLAND, OREGON 9 ?'223 (503)45-5858 58 March 30 1993 FAX 1'MC3)4E2 5667 i6ALSO AOMITTE O IN CALIFORNIA My� °5� L ' 1 .i+ wI tl ^~ 4 1 Q 5 ,,y11 �� * X �r RYA. } 1 l�r 1- AM W I •N 5i1 k t ,y�.'Y: WATER Currently there are no houses or blacktop in the proposed sub- division and already the na tirdl, wetlands to the south of the proposed sub-division is having problems containing the natural flow of water and accumulation that comes from t ,e Math school and the area in its nataral state. Several questi an.s need to be addressed and answered prior to approval for the sub - division. First, how ouch additional runoff water will there be as a result of the sub - division as compared to how much runoff water there is currently. This is important to determine not only the effect of the development on the wetlands, but whether there will be a carry over effect onto the Thomas' property. The dairy farm's property falls within the nature: 0,0 flow of water coming off part of that property at issue and there is concern that additional amounts of water coming off the property onto the dairy fames will cause additional problems to the farm. 18.84.040 B and C require that any development and land form alteration will not cam s° off -site effects or hazards to life or property. Additional water streaming onto the farm will cause effects and hazards to the Thomas' property. The code, 18.84.0400, requires that the water flow capacity of the drainage way is not decreased within the development. However, the applicant is requesting approval to enclose a seasonal stream on the west end .f4 the property. If the aeasonal stream a of the q drainage will be enclosed, then the natural ability of the drainage way to receive water jute it will be prevented, and therefore, the natural drainage way capacity will be decrease' which violates 10.84.04003 As a result of this development, there would be an advers effect upon the wetlands to the south. It is interesting to note that narration specifies that "this runoff" will be managed so that the quality of the wetland's areas will be maintained. Of particular concern is that a definition be developed as to what the quality of the wetlands currently are. Without some sort of definition as to the quality of the wetlands, there would be no way to be able to measure how the actual quality of the wetlands will be maintained. I would also not that although applicant states be maintained, she that the quality of t��e, wetland's designed will a manner ,= s to st.,tes "this project will be c p g indicated ave. Any encroachment or change site or off -site drainage which would impact wetlands change �n o characteristics, will be mitigated as part of the project". You cannot maintain the quality of a wetland's areas at the same time Y g you are going to cause such disturbance so as to attempt to '� w mitigate the damages you are anticipating causing. It seeras as though they are trying to speak out of both sides of their mouth. 2. kllnnticottleLtuieJir 18.20.120 APPROVAL STANDARD Of major concern to my client is that there is presently no buffering between the proposed sub-division and my client's property. Particularly my client's barn, which houses the milk ® producing cows 18.80. '120 sets forth the approval standards a 11 developmente in the city. It states The Commission shall make findings that the following criteria are satisfied when approving or approving with conditions, or the criteria are not satisfied when denying an application. All the applicable code sectione are stated and then it met forth additional criteria. One of the additional criteria is found in subsection b. "Buffers +gar screening, and compatibility between adjoining use ' (i) Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses (for example, betweez4 single-family and multiple- family residential and residential, and commercial): The farm is an agricultural use and is zoned light industrial. The code requires buffering to exi et, yet none have been proposed. "(ii) In addition to the requirements of the buffering matrix, the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy and extent of the buffer required under chapter 10.100m (a) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier. The applicant's proposed land use is di Shen the land . diferent 't in use as a dairy farm. Currently, it is used as a dairy farm, but it is zoned light industrial. As the land is used no , nimal sound can go on for up to ten to twelve hour : For = xaianple A snow ii heat will often bellow between four and twelve hour. A calf ta,'en away from its mother or a calf taken off milk for the fir t tlse: will also bellow for an extended period of time. There is s;;c r .ern that without a significant buffer placed between the development and the farm, there will be substantial interference With the enjoyment of the new property owne ss of f homes and uses. cam sing conflict between the two different types , ad "° Also result of odor; that Without a 3 • ckcli nAa►til ®\aaitiC.lir of concern, is the Air pollution that emanietes as a tha cows. produce manure. Manure produces odor; is not pleasant t� y yl Cows ro to havenu your home sPturatec, with. buffer installecl there will be a natu,ral. csDnfl.ic'r, • �p ` eration and the new prepe: �ty owners. . A between the farming �e • buffer of su�.;fici width with screening will help prevent the odors that emanate from the farm to the development. Also of concern is air pollution. Air pollution in the form of di ft that arises as a result of farm activities as well as the fly pollution that °Pours . Wherever there is a lot of manure, there is going to� , be a lat of flies, specially during the summertime., A a .,'.esult of the farming, operation, there is an immense amount of flies that congregate in the area, and without a proper buffer zone, those flies will migrate to th new home dwellings of the proposed sub - division. The concerns listed above r L11 be mitigated to substantial degree if proper buffer zone is in pl.cem. The buffer matrix, found in 18.100.134, requires that at least thirt y feet with screening � Placed t een R12 development or single disattached dwelling units and a light industrial project. At the very minimum, there needs to be at least a thirty foot buffer zone with screening between the farm property and sub- division. The Thomas believe that it • would be more appropriate, 6 s i ° . with taking into consideration the factors listed in 18.80.120, 00 eet� wash buffer zone should actually be between 75 and 100 h appropriate scree r g . . the farming screening so as to diminish the effects of o p eration u p on the sub-division. �v�sa® n CONCLUSION Most important is that it appears that th = sub - division was proposed and planned without taking into account all the of zoning ro ordinances and requirements imposed upon it by th = city. Of particular concern as mentioned above, is the ecological impact of the development upon not only the wetlands below or to the south, but upon the farm as well. Although planners of farm h the 1 ter • v a e r recommendations h r,_g r to s to �h� ae�, e3�op�oent have proposed as �ttrerl with failed regards mitigating the ecological impact, it y into account any buffer zone between this sub-division and the farm. i (A buffer zone that is ra guired by the city) . The applicant has simply not done its homework In conclusion, the cede re q uares the city to ose a buffe r be t ween the dairy f arm and the development prior to approval. T� • � _o �a Without the buffer zone there will arise a constant conflict between the development and the existing use of the rarm. Applicant should be required to hire : `¢ the to e�cperts� � o ,yelp determine t impact of the development upon the soil, drainage way, offsite property, and vegetation. 4. G1,dit tt tilAo stloltie r Response to staff Report City of T5gard0 a un M'arch 3001993 Friends of Cook Park etlands IAPact State 1 a n offer of trees n'i fence between property and wetlands. Follow Surface ester Management Regulations requiring the cvnzitruotion, of on-site water qua quality ac i ities geview of proposed grading Plans in areas with greater than a 25 percent slope 6. Erasure per its o the trI°ivi s on of State Lant''',s and Corps of Engineers are obtained. Tree r, ,,ova permit Maned that in lu;' es tree liurvey identifying trees over 6 inches in diameter e d justification fo):t removal Sanitry sewer designed to av &!d wetland/ sensitive l end crtssings. 9 Bufferifence b.tween development and Thomas DiairY. or nwest Civil o, esi n, inc. 9130 SW Maw Court Suite E. Nlli sonwi id,. r1tegon 11010 5931 682.8667 City Of Tigard Plant,..ag Division 1$125 S. W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Subject Narrative For The Subdivision and. Develop Gent Of Waverly Estates Located On The East Side Of S. W. 92nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon Y; as Ladies and Gentlemen: are proposing the subdivision and development of the property on the east side of S. W. 's venue, between the High School and Cook Park into medium density residential housing to iik_ appropriate City standards. This project ?Anted R12, r, r, A velo ment plan has been compiled showing a project creating 49 residential lots Lot 1 � site de p P This site has an area of 11.. ;i�, acres sizes vary from 4,445 square feet to 10,080 square feet. lot acres developable area of 7.55 acres. It is our intent to configure the lots to provide a { K . ith a de p depth to width ratio not exceeding 2.5 to 1 as required by City Code. are by all lots except lots 1, 18 through 23, ?8, 31, - s Basic requirements for solar access, ��, a Yuen „, i g are . '' Letts 1, 28, 31, and 36. 36, 40, 46, and 47 Protected solar builds lines are to be applied to tan This results in a 83% compliance prescribed by City of Tigard desi . i'ar clear vision A i.ion area. will be provided at the street intersection with S. W 92nd Avenue, S. W. 92nd � :x ...Avenue will have additional right-el-way dedicated to create a 30 foot wide right: - centerline. A half - street improvement along the frontage of this project (S W. right- of-way from along 92nd Avenue) is planned to create a 20 foot wide street from centerline. Pa. On-site public street l►�roveixients (Kent Drive) are planned to create a 34 foot wide street A 20 foot wide strip within a 50 foot right-of-way Can -s p wide foot wide right-of-way. well a pedestrian path S. � �7t1� 50 dedicated and improved for fire access p ath to . w�ia.�u17i, a �.. +� ded� P will Avenue. of our pre-application, we indicated design for public street access Kea lots with At the time 0 p p� plan . � been modified to a private street concept With has bee "'” .. � e. -' will requirements d code to circular cul-de-sacs. The plan designed `y private streets w i e hammerheads. The tivat� des . �ed to meet the re ,�drea�ieiats Of City OX on one l street with curbs on both sides and sides include a minimum of 24 feet of paved side O IIiWr'� ° 1s' l�zed by connecting � to existing '�i ;aid Water Domestic water and fire service will be sup • ` Fire �Q� District avaterli nes neat this site with fire hydrants provided as designated by the Tualatin and fescue District. A ,, system sewer steak will connect into an existing 12°' City of Tigard sewer system near y the southern boundary of this project. e agreement on this property, storm 'water runoff will allowed onto As part of the pnarchas � that the quality of • the property to the south of this proj 11 .Ram i{uraln!., • • ow�ner,1 r. Robert Gray, to understanding gnat recent ,negQtatioaa��; with the southerly' pray �: adjust the common property boundary, have resulted in adeqUate open and area and suitable y he htio 1, we understand that area for a trianlbicy'ole path �►itl�� fir., s property. In the required i me e access roads within the pstsposed public e e ents will be constructed on Mr. Gray's property. As =vested d the Pre-application conference, we lo we enclosed the agreement between the subject property comets relating to storm drainage easements and surface runoff off to the southerly property. CO Relative to Code 18. ;.... Approval Standards Section (C) we ask that the application be approved for a sensitive within i i Y pp . a criteria= A 25,, �� nee lands permit �v�idlnn ire based on the fdIllcr�v foot setback will b along the n.:; erly boundary of the wetland as shoW,i on the enclosed .'Preliminary Subdivision plat ", Sheet 3. required Division o f State Lands wetland MI permit will also be applied for as part of project. The project will be desi In such a manner as to minimize site disturbances as indicated abo ie. Any encroachment or e ►,�a,� � cjacte�sttcs will impact at ;ate. change in on site ®r off -site drainage which vrQnld ��p.� ,�, , � . mitigated as part of the project (see enclosed . Wetland l e1 ti $gation Reports). � " � Chapter �� i�. To Erosion control measures will be implemented at this site a ord to .. . out. knowledge, all other sensitive lands requirements Of this chapter will _ be met. The y p . Design of this project will prq��o��sn�.�� of Chapter 1 -1.5Q Tree Removal, ��. also be ��et sati y the physical lg�t �.lon and natural hazards, good plain, and wetlands, natural areas, . d met recreation and open spate policies of the Comprehensive Plan. . p ... ado; and parks, p { should also be stated that this des �elopment will help to . alleviate some of the need for additional g g e prime g adntit�nal l�ousin _ in the area and will rovtde r>u�e acss for families to existing educational and park facilities closely. Sincerely, WOI m 'SST CIVIL DESIGN, INC. Dennis D. Smith, President Bogincer ng Manager DDS :tvn LU Enclosures: • w. Estates), The hearings ° , �,�� hereby hymns S 93-0007 and SLR 93 (Waverly i, ), subject to the coeidit ons in Sodom of the Staff ) i the folkiwkg atnendments: 1e Condition 9 is an nded tt add the following sentence. The . t shall a minimum .. Coo;", f � to the t it lees not lad y . . the Wit, and sonik Mos of tit" minority mad, Conlition 12 is amenc,ed to rad as follows: 12. The willow shall provirk an on -site viivizr ' quality facility as atablished. Luke the guidelines of Uanified. Sewerage A cy Resolution and Order 91.47 b f ry ' ' e .. facility located outside the wetland u . o: ta be accessible to Cotutty 4 tenan vehicles. The facility and access to and araund the facility be "wed d to the City. b. The facility shall be located in whole or part along the east edge of the site (e.g., on lots 20a1 north of the•. ; we tlands nr .: �, lion ate) to the extent possible while mi ., removal of vegetation, co the facility is situate on lot 21, a 42 -gib diameter naPple tree on that lot r: I if practicable. A quahhed arborist or equivalent shouM in the ` k of the Way as necessa.ry to determine whetter it is pucticable, if it 5, t practicable, sh tree. The app:~.cant shall ply etrith thou rtvcommendations. d- �a ti no u oppoac my to comment oil thy facility plan should be r' '44.(11 td if requited. by law. • 3. Condition 8 is amended to te....4 the lbilowing sentence: The applicant shall improve a tc,irnporary turn- around d a t or eiear the east end of Kent Drive within a public right of way or moment &limited to the City, subject to rev and approval of the turn-ate design and. dimensions b y the C i t y engineer a n d Thalathr . Valley Fire and t?,,escue District 4. Condition 11 is amended PO e a P b ant shy amend the fad of the plat or file d. nts with ith requiring h comply (Ands to the property available on as h e y on t aP plan, , a i which is Page 13 -- IrY dews Officer d e cseorg SUB 93j6007/„ 93-0004 ( g /ve j Estates) Condition 3 is amended to add the following sentence: No ease in off-site runoff rates or volumes is allowed unless the applicant demosostrates it will not *tease the potential for dossrnstream flooding. 6. Condition 20 is amended to add the following ser ten the used public The st.�1 ��it applicada�+, fir � public improvements also shall identify t 'at be removed during sachng of lots. 7. A new condition 22 is added to xt;xa,gs as follows: the final plat, the 2� Before tiac. City a applicant shall amend the face of the plat or file documents with the deeds to the rsop arty to advise prospective that trees la se r than 6 inches in diameter at . ., without . .. ,mot x receiving lima the breast height �t be removed section �p a City pursuant to Tigard City Code 3. A new condition 23 is added to read as follows: 23. The south edge of lots 38 and 39 shall be moved north at least 50 feet from the wetland. 9. A new condition 24 is aided to read as follows: — 24. The applicant shall ifsistaii a minimum six-foot high fence at the nosh edge of required wetland buffer or further nom If the applicant n the not install the fence at the north edge of the common open space, the ed of the common open sp applicant shall signs identifying filling, or tree removal in t clearing, : , . an�i prohibiting development, grading, ' unpaved t planning Only _ that area witless approved by the p �y pedestraiH rie d pathways should be tutted south of the fence, -1� i mess to the wetland at relatively few points ' `` any. Details g t foam, ��nage and pot��d trian walkways south of the f are delegated id to the � r�o� fir �14e devel opt review and approval. 10. A new condition 25 is added to mad as follows: 25. T applicant shall . .. plat or file docu eents s- e io y prohibiting development, clearing, Aga two real in the, common cx, ei space, wetland buffer or Other than utilities and water quality '�°tlnn�x Hitless a � `� � �ee . walkways pe�.�itr"*�cl in the measu , only non pa r ed. pod common opt_ in a wetland buffer or wetland. 1 new condition 26 is added to read as follows: w e geway in the .. ef��,re the qty issues a :. + s iil1 the � ' � r" , 'on of tine site the o pin�arnt, ho+w to t�: satisi�acroa of the w�►c;�t ... P � r for date City cheated' that he will use the minimum amount of fill ne�.ess � wadi associated utilities and dtainatge* appropriate transitions in g who to the Coalition 13 is amended to add the following sentence: No increase in o " -sits runoff rates or volumes is allowed unless the applicant demonstrates it vrill not increase the potential for downstream flooding. 6. Condition 20 is amended to add the following sentence: The tiee removal permit application for the proposed public improvements also shall identify trees that will be removed during rough grading of lots. 7 +A new corndifion added to reads as follows: 22. Before ttlic City approves the final plat, the applicant shall amend the tiC` ; of the plat or file decimate with the deeds to the property to s larger than 6 inches in diameter at advise prospective purchasers that i breast height cannot be removed ',M out first receiving a permit from the City pursuant to Tigard City Code motion 18.150. 8. A new condition tion 23 is added to read as follows: 23. The south edge of lots 38 and 39 shall be moved north at least 50 feet 'from the wetland. .:- 9. A new condition 24 is added to read as follows: 24. The appl►ret shall install a minimum six -foot high fence at the edge ' + r tland buffer or further north. If the applicant does n install the fence the north edge of the common open space, then the applicant shall post signs identifying the edge of the common open Space prohibiting opt. g, g idling, or removal in . and development, clearing: grading, that area unless approved by the planning director. Only unpaved p pathways be p omitted south of the fence, with estrian@o�ien�,�d t%wa should access ` vv M wetland at points if any. ails regaro. g the f n , signage a anal potential pedestrian walkways south of the fence delegate i to the planning director for site development review and approval. 10. A new condition 25 is added to read as follows: The applicant shall amend the face of the plat or file documents with deeds to the property roh biting development, clendng, grading, filling , 401' tree removal in the common open space, wetland buffer wedatd tiolczt approved by the City, Other than Willies and water ter quality measures, only non-paved pedesidan waikvelys any permitted in the common open space, wetland buffer or wetlak'.d 11. A new condition 26 is added to read as follows: 26. lief= the City is, res a permit. at g� . y tk , �� /' � h ., ' X,.a�, • t to the r ainan Ewa �V� �e. westportion site, e.. •. ,.. minimum nt .. ....4 ... a ,. .... tr t . , f,. portion of the s��, the ��ca�t shall show to satisfaction cif the City engineer that . l neces , the t he will use the ►taut of dill road, associated utilities and drainage, appropriate the plate ts�t��n►s in mite to Age. licatrings Orteirdaiir SUS 93- 00071Sl.L 93..004 (Waveiti Esieseaj t�• • i G The applicant shall maks an a pots r t for pre-Ocestroctima meeting with the Cif of Tigatel Engineering Departieent after approval of the public ize.recneement plans but before start' looYk on the sits i applicant* licauat l engineer and *.re o shall requ � to attend this meeting prior to receiving the *mowed wed plate and,,,pernitig. Coxa> etioi. of the propared pubr.la improvements ieeuaIL. of Building Permits shall t commence until after the Engineering beparbeent 'bee =viewed and app the public icpore cats plane, a stew* opening permit or construction compliancee agreements bear been executed, execut n of a. d elo :°•- L r agreement and payment of all permit fees. 1 ® applicant shall obtain a "Joint Oermiell floe the City of Tigard. This wit shall meet the requirements of the EMS and Tualatin 8605.0 Erosion Control Peo ra e. 1E4 20. A tree survey identifying the type and size of, all trees on the silts which sere over 6 inches in diameter shall be 4, .x tte . Thin survey shall el so specify those was which are pzposted for removal ion wit shall be applied for and approved by the Plaanning Divi ion pei c • to the removal of any ®vet trees ou, k eite. STAFF CONTACT: Vl r Adonri, Planning Division. TIM M" /C&iIT SUOULD =IMBED TO COMPLY WI= TOE FOLVAXIE CatelTiONS g the 31. A tree curve, which nitttiefty3in tmype Iaai,ll b o f. .#:roc® on 1 site tted. This ► shall specify those tress which axe proposed for a a yr a igumgestagn :hg wait Gtio_ o »ea am>a tree rah `pelt shall be applied for and approved by the ` Pluming iiatai to Van removal of any such trees - -sits. Sniff =W : s Victor lei, Planning Divi SiOn. SUBDIVISIO0 JCPPEOVAL SBALL D$ VALID OttLY IF T IIPINIV ., PLAT IS SUBMITTED = OF TM itIFFECTIVR DATE OF THIS DECISION. Preparad • or 4. A. .;.,. . d By: Dick Be Stniot P -;. earner Ron Pomeroy Assistant Pi 1. ilEARINGS OFFICER - GRAN-LAMS / N SUE 93-0007 / SLR 93-0004 Data bats 473 • KO �1 t 17. The app .ioa2 t shall make an appointment for a pre-conetruction meeting r tha'_ with the �C!' of T Engineering ,tic improvement plans but 'Wore artitng work pia the *UV)* The applicant, the applicant's ® engineer and ' contractor �na11 � .. required to tad this nesting tu � � plane and permits. 18.., Construction of' the proposed public inpeovements and issuance o.. Building Permits shall not cOmmence until after the Engineering �a has and a li public i p rove/ mat plane, e, a opening 'permit cc construction, ccupliance agrecnantr.5 has been auuttd, execution. of a n op er tq t agreement an i payment of Ada permit flew. 19. rise applicant shall obtain a , "Joint al.t' "' -Iron the C; tty of tigard. a1* Basin. a>e rmit shall t 1ui s of ... 3+ an. l Erosion Control Program. 20e A tree .end Went and sire of, all trees on tha site whith Mer 6 3 *ub�3 shall al specify these tics which sed for slstt►'a.1. airm sixt h a permit ea11 be applied for and appt by the nannies Division Victor to - ra &1 of anf' much #yes ore -site. Mamie Plarnang 1�3.v M TO THE /SSW= OF B1' as TS a: 21. A tree a identifying the type and nine of all Ulna the site which are (mar 6 inches is amebic shall be submitted., ` This survary shall specify tie trees which aie reopened( for nskova1 ,..'* • 1 z �IW�I LI 1 'I�sLYOwn �enle. A a1 Adt shall be `� � e oo�� ioo of ges�4 „ �aas�► Division prior ter �t ra1. applied. for and approved, the Planning of any such � on-site. �: Victor �oari s Pl g Division. • , f T .:.I FINAL Y� :.. $UB �i B 3IGETERN mosTils or THE TARTS SUBDIVISION � VALID Comae � �� P�- a Pomeroy 5aMi temt Pia ui : Approved y: Dick Seadi®r P... anner 01 ' 3 0007 / 930004 3 t 23-113 Date PG d19 STATE OF oRgooN County of Washington City of Tigard depose and c,Yg (Flea6e Pr n' That I am a The City of 4 #i T . ga,rd, Oregon. I served NOT /03 OF PUBLIC HPAR1NG FOR: served NOTICE OF DECISION 'OR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning 4,.i .ommission � Tigard Hearinge Officer Tigard City Council cov (k,±lic Soaring l` otifze /Notice of ExhihLt "A) was mailed to each named atttahed list marked exhibit "B on the said notice NOTICE OF ]DEC SI ®N as her to bulletin board on the day of the United States _ Nail on the f _" postage prepaid.' Decision) of which is attached (Harked oaad�a a of he addre es shown the y ttachede was t _ _ e4 -19n � a�ropriate r Y 19_,_j and depg it d ;;,,,,,o....... 19�...a► Prepared Notice day e ® rte. �✓,,, • PUBLIC ca tea:, ► _ re'4 _/,...)/;/// My Commission Fxpiree. z CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Cregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY HEARINGS OFFICER 1. concerning Case Number(s):__61_2&42271g0_93 0004 2. Name of Owners jAEL2,1213.stmes.2_, Name o Applicant: E,4 P.4 3, Address 31635 JALSountszyj...., ane City Wilmmr_illit State Sak Zip 221222_,_ 4. Addre..s of Property: 91,11lit, land on SW 92nd Avenue betv_Lejisnt T a.ja.,EsLatati, c ___an Cook Park TaX Map and Lot to() .: 2112,..Jots 100 atm* 1000. 5. Request The applicant requests preliminary Subdivision plat approval to divide approximately 7.5 acres into 49 lots ranging in size from 4,000 to 10,080 sqgare feet in size. Sensitive Land Review approval in also requested to allow drainageway and wetlands modifications. APPLICABLE REWEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18034, 18.88, 18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policifas 201.1, 3.1.1, 7,1.2, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: A portion of the land on SW 92nd Avenue between Tigard High School and Cook Park (WCTH 281 14A, tax lots 100 & 1000) one The R.-12 zone allows single-family detached or attached residential units, auPlex and mulitple -family eesidential units, residential care facilities, public enPPort services, manufactured homes, family day care, home occupationo, and accessory structures among other uses. 6 Adt ibtit Approval as requested Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notices Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at and Mailed to: City Hall, The applicant and owner(s) Ownera of record within the reqPired The affected NeighbOyhood Planning Organization Affected governmental agencieo distance 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON ...p.2g4430 j...1993 UNLESS AI APPEAL IS FILED. The Adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department', Tigard City Hall, 13125 $W Hall, P.04 80X 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. AM2221L Any party to the decision may &Weal this decision in accordance With 18.32.200(8) and Section 16.32.370 Which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 16 daya after notice is given and °sot- The aPPeal maY be schMitted on CitY forme and want be acct/mpanied by the appeal fee ($315.00) and transcript cost (varied up to a maximum of $500.00). The deadline for filing of an appeal ie 3:30 .m. 10. Questions: If you have any qatibtiondo please tizqkll the city Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171. J I PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION PILE WO: SUB 93- .0007 /S%R 93,--0004 FILE TITLa Gray-La /Waymire APPLICANT: Kenneth Waymire 31835 SW Country View Lane Wilsonville, OR 97070 AGENT: DenLis Smith Northwest Civil Design, Inc. 9130 oW Pioneer Court, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 OWNERS: R.A. and Linda D. Cray, PO Box 1016 Sherwood, OR 97140 Charles & Zada Lamb 13770 SW Fern Tigard, OR 97223 School District 23J 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: ' The a+ plicant requests preliminary Subdivision plat approval to divide approximately 7. aerie into 41 lots wanging in size from 4,000 to 12,000 square feet in size. Sen /itive Lance Review approval is also requested to allow drainfgei ay and wetlands madif ioat ions. APPLICABLE '^ REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 15.54, 10,.84, 18.88, 18.92, 18:100, 18.102, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164; comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 5.1.3. LCCA"i'10N. A portion of the land on SW 92nd Avenue between Tigard High School and Cook Park (WCTM 251 14A, tax lots 100 tx 1000) 12 (Residential, ) lei and 2�u zone allows single- family. �4'�NE. �+,.• dential, 12 tunic® /acre - sidenti�.1 detached or attached residential units, pup � y units residential care facilities, public support services, manufactured homes, family day care, home occupations, and accessory structures among other uses. NPO NO: 6 NPO CHAIRPERSON: Sue Carver PHONE NUMBER: 639 -i507 CHECEt ALL WHICH APPLY: F .. STAFF DECISION COM ENT3 DUE BACK Te9. STAFF AON N 19 93 F AN ING !.)MMI3SION HEARINGS OFFICER CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME :. DATE OF i ARI:NG: 3 /4 93 TINE: .7100 li. m DATE OF HEARING: TIME: REQUEST FOR CO T MAP A►T'1ACHME YTS a t , NARRATIVE SITE PLAN STAFF CONTACT s Ron gl a 639 .,. 4172_. LANDSCAPING PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN OTHER: Peel 3 m .nEigv Plait 11 If FILE NO: PROPOt4A'q. DESCRIPTION S' j 61,s-000 62. x' 3- 00 FILE TITLE: k. e. elk /J tie. *Ubq, a Wp �+ V t }y �' , �e -rr Y i Ci4. /.. .56pju;Ile rCR � 707c, Lid AGENT peov o 'iS .5;00.1e, egy � u� i'idu er Csv y /1-.40 e OWN c Sc4oai Not. x3 T 7 s 'P C, . •c tl(jy. , Q Its .,, K s ,P" to t R tUEST: "7 i' Q�� li+. . 51,4 • v $:. ( (4. try,. \ a c .` viae eteeprotc;liwte/r. ?1 S he r es ;alb osf `fie '44 PIA, Oeb ' d �i ci'Nif ' ws -'si ,� r'�":R' �+ ^i /LiS (l��(r d . 3 1 ' Ra ' e.a Affrbve4 is 41.se, r -r l a t C®. , •- i „, Sheraeacj r OF: $9 ?I % Amy f 4tIeS ete4c1 4PA , 4,C4,b ' ; APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERI�►�2 c pc cr's' 1 ;i ee .72 ) 3. ioe, tg 40.02 . `iT. 1 5' t r %�/•1 1, 4r l u Copuf . V(Q,m d {/c r 8P I i G s --' e• r Q '745r 1 11 LOCATION: 4 00 [5 .,, � ., `t a S bt Cdo [c - (t�-� $/ / " j -7 4 /r ?s- t00 P te,) civ.s suolVAIS ZONE S .. t'2 C ResidentNA, (2: NPO NO: NPO CHAIRPERSON: 5 • PHONE NU4P 1R t CYmECK ALL WHICH APPLY STAFF DECISION CO TS DUE. PLANNING COMMISSION DATE HEARINGS OFFICER D'lATE CITY CouNcni DATE OF�i3E 7�NGAI'F ON TaME...�._..�. OF HEAR/NG: T IMEs:. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND ATTACHMENTS: VICxNITt MAP NNARRATI/E SITE PLAN STAFF CONTACTS LawascapaNG Pr. .N ARCH1TE URAL P] •� r • CTY OF TIGAIW. ��I LTBD ; 9sS1FP A CITY OF TIGARD, Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall , PO Box 23397 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION NO ADDRESS; SOUTH SINE OF 16300, S.W. 92ND AIF .JE MARD"- N _. —. TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO e TAX Z`7e , 2S 1 L _,.__A t,TTON OF TAX LOTS 100 AND 1000. SITE SIZE 1i° X12 ACRES PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* SCHOOL _DISTRICT 23J CHARLES & ZADA A. LAMB, & R. A. & LINDA D. GRAY PHONE •tRESS * CITY ZIP APPLICANT* KENNETH WAYMIRE ADDRESS 31835 SW COUNTRY VIEW LAN1PHONE 694-5505 CITY WILSONVILLE ZIP 97070 ,.., *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leases in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this a p provided ou page two or application in the space P s submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY Y The owners of record of the subject property, request p ramission to divide a 328 639' s. f. or e ,:7.55 ac Total Arse. parcel into 49 lots between' (number of lots) 4,000 and 129000 square feet in size. *c SCHOOL DISTRICT 23Jt 620 -1620` 13137 SW, PACIFIC 11-WAY, TIGARD, OR 97223 cif r. A. AND LINDA D. GRAY 692 -4675 P.O. Bo . x 1016 , SHERWOOD, OR 97140 : C 52OF /13P _ 24-►8 48 52 5�* CHARLES. :AND ZADA A: LAMB 5 *'do �%8 137,0 S. W. FERN, TIGARD, OK 97223 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. ,S2d „�.— 006' 7 OTHER CASE NO' s a SL.A 9°3-.0,04)51' RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: lirA DATE: 7-- ,.. " ""'` -2 Applcation elements submitted: (A) Application form (1) ✓'� (B) Owner's signature/written r 1iuthorization (C) Title transfer instrument (1) t..,<.(D) Assessor's map (1) (E) Preliminary Flat (prey° app checklist) ✓(F) Applicant's statement J(G) V(H) (pre -app checklist) - aeert- Fiing fee ($415 plus *5 per lot? 6b x'44 DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: COMP. PLAN /ZONE DESIGNATION N.P.O. Number Preliminary Plat A:pprova:l. Date: rF+.�..:..� 10.4.,..■!+* Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering ,... , . ' List any variance, Planned Development, sensitive rands, or o.th "' land use actions to be considered as part of this application: WETLAND l i ri SLOE IN EXCESS OF 25% 40 Applf t is c ` To have a complete application yott, will reed to $ub!nit attachments described in the attached i.nfoati on sheet at the time you submit this application- 51. TOE A,PPLIC 'T(S) qOALL CEIr k r THAT «, • The abo' a reQuest does not violate an deea� restrictions that attached ta . or im ert If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise tie rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all thv conditions and limitations of the approval. All of the above statements and' the etateuente in the plot plan, attt �.thas:�1 based on this hmem!ts, and exhibits transmitted permit 1 i.„ are true„ and the g any p any , Applicants so acknowled that au are ��pp licatidn, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements false e . �.,y The applicant has read the eotia a contents of the a p. pin tiaf, includi' �- . the policies and criteria, and umderstan.ds the requ i rementa for aPPrOViag or denying the application` .�... day of SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband; and wif c) of the subject property. (1014101/040 $113fi15'��i Pion �'t �� Northwest �•--- Pioneer Court, Suite E, Wilsonville, Oregon 97030 503 / 082.8687 February 25, 1993 Project No. 92-195 City Of Tigard Planning Division 13125 S. W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Subject: Narrative For The Subdivision and Development Of Waverly Estates Located On The East Side Of S. W. 92nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon • Ladies and Gentlemen We are ro posing the subdivision and development of the property on the east side of S. W„ P � g 92nd Avenue, between the High School and Cook Park into medium delasity residential lousing to the appropriate City standards. This project zoned R12: A site development plan has been compiled showing a project creating 49 residential lots, Lot sizes vary firm 4,445 square fe et to 10,080 square feet. This site has an area of 11.12 acres with a developable area of 7.55 acres, It is our intent to configure the lots to provide a lot depth to width ratio not exceeding 2.5 to 1 as required by City Code. Basic requirements for solar access are met by all lots except lots 1, 18 through 23, 28, 31, 36, 40, 46, and 47: Protected solar building lines are to be applied to Lots 1, 28, 3;� ;. and. 36 This results in '4 83% cornplianet prescribed by City of Tigard design seandard. A clear vision area will be provided at the street intersection with S. W. 92nd Avenue. S. W. 92nd ?a:venue will have additional right -of way dedicated to create a 30 foot wide right- of-way from centerline. A half-street improvement along the frontage of this project (S. W. 92nd Avenue) is planned to create a 20 foot wide street from centerline. O n site public street improvements rent Drive) a re _planned to create a 3 foot wide street within a 50 foot wide right-of-way, A 20 foot wide stip within a 50 foot wide right-of-way p pedestriar will. be dedicated and ;gin ro'✓ed for fire access as well as a �edestridr to S, w 87th Avenue. At the time of our pre application, we indicated design for public street access to lots with plan p p with s. .. .. . City .. circular cul-de-sacs. The . has beer! . modified to a private �of once code to hammerheads, The private streets will be designed to meet the requirements y P l include a minimum of 24 feet of paved street with curbs on both sides and sidewalks on one side 41, • Domestic water and fire service will be supplied by connecting to existing Tigard Water District waterlines near this site with fire hydrants provided as designated by the Tualatin Fire and Rescue District. A sanitary sewer system will connect into an existing 12" City of Tigard sewer system near the southern boundary of this project. As part of the purchase agreement on this property, storm water runoff will be allowed onto the property to the south of this project. This runoff will be managed such that the quality of wetland areas will be maintained. Due to steep slopes, wetlands, flood plain, and heavy tree cover on portions of the site, we feel it is impractical to construct a water quality swale facility. We are requesting to pay the "fee in lien of" due to these issues. As requested during the pre- application process, Lt is our understanding that a lot line adjustment and minor partition mar,) will be submitted by Mr. Gray as part of his agreement. We have adjusted tbe preliminary plat boundary to accommodate the lot line adjustment and minor partition map. We have submitted as part of this application preliminary maps showing how Mr. Gray's surveyor will accomplish their work Relative to Code 18.84.040 Approval Standards Section (B) we ask that the application be approved for a sensitive lands permit for this site which includes areas with slopes greater than 25 percent based on the following criteria: The development plan is intended to include provisions for constructing adequate access for hornesites and will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required, Areas of the site which are occupied by slopes greater than 25 percent are indicated on the enclosed "Preliminary Subdivision Plat, Sheet 3"', Provisions will also be implemented to address erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on -site and off site effects or hazards to life or property, If any wet soil conditions, high water table, high shrink -swell soils, compressible/organic soils, or shallow bedrock are encountered at this site, appropriate geciechnical input will be included for this project. Where natural vegetation is removed as part of this development, it will be replanted in accordance with Chapter 18.100: Relative to Cod' 18.84,040 Approval Standards Section (C) we ask that the application be approved for a sensitive lands permit for this site which includes existing drainageways based on the following: As indicated above, the proposed development will be designed in a manner. .. which minimizes site disturbances and addresses erosion, sedimentation, ground instzbility or other adverse on -site and off -site effects or hazards to life or property by appropriate means. Via' water flow capacity of the drainageway will not be decreased by this projects 1 rosion control measures will be implemented in areas where natural vegetation will be removed in accordance with Chapter 18.100. The drainageways will be replaced by a public utility designed to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. The necessary U S. Army Cor of Engineers_and State of . Ore on ,and Board, .'division 151—SfairraiiElliFaitls will be obtained for this probe t. It is our • s ►ias, +xst 11� understanding that recent negotiations with the soatherl P ro P ertY owner, Mr. Robert Gray, to adjust the common property ha ve resulted in adequate open land area and suitable area for a pedestrian/bicycle path within 1‘4.' Gray ° s property. In addition, we understand that the required maintenance e access roads within the proposed public easements will be constructed on Mr. moray 's property, requested during ti e p r; -a pP lgcata ©n conference, we have enclosed the agreement ream ent between the subject property ov tiers relating to storm drainage . easements and surface runoff to the southerly property" Relative to Code 18.84.040 Approval Standarels Section (C) we ask that the application be approved for a sensitive aud s permit within hin wetlands based on the tmllrwipg criteria: A 25 setback will be nam tchaad along the northerly bounelary of the wetland as shown on the enclosed "Preliminary Subdivision Plat", Sheet 3. The required Division of State Lands wetland fill permit will also be applied for as part of pro eet. The project will be designed in such a manner as to Minimize sit disturbances as indicac l above. Asy encroachment or chaiage in on -� +te or off -site drainage p e ,' the � would impact wetland �ca�aracto�ristirs win be mitigated a.. part of th�. ro a which ��o '. � . • g p project (see enclosed Wetland DelineationiMidgation Reports). Erosion control measures will be �tplemented at this site according " according to to , �;hapter 18.IO0, To our knowledge, all other sensitive lands requirements of this chapter will be net The paovisions of Chapter 18.150, Tree Removal, will aiso be met. Design of this project rvia satisf y the physical limitation and natural hazards, flood plain, and wetlands, ni tural areas, .... and parks, recreation and open space pollch s of the,. Comprehensive Plan. It should also t e stated that t is development will he.:" to alleviate some of the need 4 the � e�tl t0�' additional housing in tl•e area and will provide prime access for families to exi!Aing educational dad park facilities closeby. Sincerely, NORTHWEST CIVIL DESIGN, INC Dennis De Smith, President Engineering Manager D:DSlvn Enclosures! I o 'th vveO.t CM .0.0gn9 hic Northwest Civil l ign, Inc. 9130 SW Pioneer art, Suite E,11►ii orndile, Oregon 07070 50316624667 • TO: C y Of Tigard Planning D ivisiOn 13125 S. W. Hal!, Boui a Y.a'rd Tigard, Oregon, 97223 DATE: 2/25/93 JOB NO. 92 -195. ArFE� fl iN: Mr. Jerry Offer ..._. ,....�_ .j RE: : Waverly Estates Subdivision WE ARE SENDING YOU Under separate arate cover via ... the t'oilowiig items ��,� Att1 ;�:�ied [ � P Shop Drawings 1 Copy of letter [ ] Plans [ 1 Saniples [ 1 Specifications [ ] Change orde 1 Prints [ DESCRIPTIOr Submit Complete Preliminary Subdivision Application For _Vaver.y :Estates Subdivision Full Sets Civil Drawings Waverly Estates Subdivision 3 THESE ARE TRAIsISMITTEt as c1'etrked below; [ 1 Approved as submitted [ 1 Resubmit copies for app 'o' ✓ai [ '( Approves] as noted 1 Submit copies for distribution Return corrected prints [ 1 RFrt�irried for corrections [ p ' [x] For approval For you' use [ 1 M rdquested [ ] Please sigh and return [ ] FOR BIDS DUE .. [ 1 For ''v wW a d cons ent [ ] PRINTS i 11i RNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS. _.. 9180 SWPieneer Court Suite E, Oivg41 97071 5031682-8687 ian, Inc. ' 9VVNoarn!!!e; Ora8an 97070 503 / 082. 06$7 Cover Sheet Application Form Ow er's Signature/Written Ai thoi zation Title Transfer Instrument Existing Street Dedication DOOCCU.inenre Assessors' Mari 7. pre -app. Checklist 8. Filing Fee Applicant's Statement 10. Preliminary Lot Line aid Partition Map 11: Solar Access Worksheet 12. Statement of Agreement with Bob Gray and with . Ken Wayraire To Allow Sorfac c Discharge of Storm Drainage to South Parcel, p Mitigation Plan x�. �eti�.d' Report with 14. Preliminary Plat and Complete Civil Engineering Drawm s &NIS A111181031 DATE: ..,Citvetito, � r',ITY OF TIGARD PRE 4 PPLIQ:FonON CARFEI ENCE NHS APPLICANT • E - i U t4 a. AGENT: ... �■ . ' Pa "Y" e eA L. Phone: Phone: AD3R sS s 8 red pAstk Rac LOCATION TAX MAP & TAX T: sA Cot a r 41600 NECESSARY AP LICA ION s : m.rvi..,r■ m. e- PROPO 1AL DESCRIPTION: _J1+ COMPREHENSIVE PTA DESIGNATION: ZONING ING DESIGNATION: tit I AfiAtIndita NEIGHEORBOOD.PLAUNING ORGANIZATION , & CHAIRPERSON: PHONE: Aloole ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot Site: 3 e)61'21361. ft. Minimum lot Width:., m ft. Setbacks:. ,front- .'.a, ft., slide- ft., tear ° ft. garage.,.. Q. fl . corrner- . .: ;Eta. fn both streets. � eeco Maximum site coverage: Wib M ninnum 1 n peed or natural Vegetation area: a: t ZaTaxiMuni blinding height ey. ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage 25 feet Unletta ldt id created through the tenor land partition .p `or ead. i Loge created as part of a partition Must 11,1alre a miiabpriUM of 15 feet of f Ot tage or hava a.Mitaiittim 15 foot Wide access ea.S ement : ratio of 2.5 to 1. Maximum lot depth 9e., width SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets ft. from centerline Of ` t ti door ft. from {Y .. ft., along � g the Site ► boundaty Acres ao Structures u to 628 e d ft. in n �.de 5 ft. ,...��. yard aetbadk ee�t. o� sidle =.[ L18,Gk from tutu. areas lot .irn, u structt trey o u to 1. Accessory . - 1000 e . ft. (c #her�ibmeki) S� PLa g al p toning diati�Lct eel. a - applicable ��n Zero lot 'line tote= minimum 10 foot eeparation be' tsget* oiaildi>ngs Multi - family residential blinding' separation: de Co4a Sectilja 18.96.030 Page .1 OIL I A SPBCIAL BUILDI *O HEIGHT PROVISIONS 'lag Lots: Maximum height of 1 -1/2 stories or 25 ft., whichever is leas in most ranee; 2-1/2 stories or 35 ft. in 0 -7, R -12, R -25 or R-40 r onee it stand ards of Code Section 18.98.03048) are met.' Building Height Sxtlep tione (Code section 18.98.020) : buildings located in .. ntiaasl i.tone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: a a ®sa rae►�.de floor area to Otte -area 1. r�► a�1�h¢iaaue► FAR (building ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will .exist; ' All actual building eetbac� will at least 1,2. the bui ing*a height; And 3, The e3trneft>xre will not abut a residential al st ne di' :,tria:t. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION Cede Chapter 18.92 specifies that the net Community Development by residential unite allowed on a particular site may be calculate) b dividing th e net area of the e developable area b_ y the minim a number of f (square feet xeruired per dfaili n � Unit in the applicable zoning district. Net development area is calcula ted by subtracting the following land area (s) from the gross site area 1. • All sensitive lands areas land within the 100 year f lecdplaixa •- slopes exceeding 25% drainageways 2. Land dedicated for park purposes 3 Public right-of-way dedication 4. All land provided for private etreetld (includes acceseways through parking areas\ The City of Tigard allows . a residential. density transfer. of up to 25% of the unite th : t could otherwise have beea developed on aeneitive lands above to developable portion the site in area`s listed in (1) 11 a the dewel® able rti ®n �f t accordance with code Section 18.92.030 It is the responsibility applicant a residential development application to provide detailed calculation for permitted d residential r ..._ _ . - g , as�,r tae 14 e ,x� (5 6 dens 3.iy and density i:rantalferz'� 3ESIYJEld°CTATa OI.OPMEN3 SOLAR 1 ACCESS subdi:�►i+�n� and minor partitions are subject to Effective May 1, 19 that 80% of all lots developed must s:dol.ar access reeiuix'�ae�nt're which state t be solar-oriented. arac� er the ® - oriented lot are high or ie?r ed 'I.°hED ch g _ y � the how e, 1 evele of wintertime satin striking out q walls and roofa og house orientation maxiilizing south window area, and a south- sloping aifoof areas. To achieve this one may utilize ti heyi .followings 1. clu em+an ® orientation within0 ` dlegrea�e® ®f souih; north-eolith Basic re� it e8i ..._. a lot with apt leases enoion and are orien 2. Protected solr - wilding I� nee The eelar buildin,, line :.uet as be 0 orierate,tW ° . middle - er ®f� �� lot to tlnd soiitSi�i minimum of 70 feet it between .. e, � le the norther�nmeat buildable boundary of e dcl o>E�S feet � wean �,n? lot on Which the bdndin g line i it . � e l.ocateii. The f iret option reera� . .. � . . _ ,_ , . h .. ire® the hou ®e� to be 3i esfc��a�man�c+e tlptl.oane. oriented within 30 degrees of an east west axle and have at leA *rat 80t of the ground fleet' ao wall eacanc death wall �r ®toted facor� s�asele?. The page 2 • ».i. >. L. 110 option requires at least 32% of the glass and 500 square feet of the,: roof area to face south and be protected from shade. Total or partial exemption of as site from the solar accen i revilement can 1•�• be for the following reasons: 1. East, west or tortb elopes steeper than 20%. Off -site shade scorers (struote�sces, vegetation topography). 2. . 3. On',, site as bade ation) ►� eo�ir�s .(v+�a�t ,hd juetment® alleWi ng reduction of the 80+ solar lot design requirement can be for the following reasons: . Reduced density or an increased cost of at leant five percent due toz .- east, west or north elope greater than l0 %,, - signifi,wa nt inatur a feature, - cxieting road or blotting pattern, public easement or ;eight -of -way. » Reduction in inapoi -tans ies �► Pre - existin development assn t 3p g shade (vegetation) . to nh the development complies i exthe sol Maps and text sufficient _ . P ▪ design Standard, except ..or lota'e for Which an exemption j required, including All of the following 111.temez ,0666keei. ' 1464 a 1. The naorth- saoutlh lot diraints ,on Arid front lot line Or' ieet' ation enacirlY)11Cd1,' props te lotto 2. Protected doter building • lines and relevant, building site restrictions, if applicaab?., ®. 3. For the purpose Of identifying trees eXempt. from Section F, a- map showing existing trees at. les; ;.t 30 .1, feet tall and , over • 6 inches diameter at a • point 4 feet aabo u e ` graded. including,. their height diameter and species, and stating that they are to be retained and 4. Copies oft all private restrictions relating to solar access» f an eraraption or adjudtment Le rcqu►eetede Maps and' text• sufficient to chow th at given lots or areas is the development nt coapiy With the s axdards for such an exemption or ad juatuent shall be submitted. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION Regardless of the allewed housing density in .ail zoning dietriot�, any rc rt iaithin ,,x,00 feet of a designated eataVbliehed area :Shall nut be property Y ' developed at a density greater than 125 percent; of the akt.Xiatiti p g (not aonitig) of the adjacent parcel. Comprehensive flan deei naatioe PARKING AND ACCESS Required automobile parking for this type of uses Secondary u,�: ` egtui.r = gr lsiaa►'•, 25% of required space: may be Standard parking Space dieen•. e on- us 9 Compact parking space diaeu iqn : a S oatot -®sly spaces. Q /� e X 18 ft. ft. X li ft.`: Handicapped parkings prOViding s' c eea of five required, automobile kin sped la�ta11 ��" e'appropriately located and desig nates handicapped 9t44 t . er of handicapped , Cage 3 parking spec sr-Ito be provide d parking epace site are masdated by the Oregon Re aced! Statutes (see lout ) . A hand Lct d parking spice symbol all be painted on the par ° ng epad.® surfa ce and an $app r Prieto sign a 11 be provided. le racks are required for cl. rci al Use0, and industrial uses king spaces. Bicycle parking aunt cycle rack Space per 15 auto parki ated in areas protected from a Ili provide specifications f =. : pproveaa All king areas vos Lc uaee, :. • teaidentinl usedstt, rovid 15 or luore entomb! l.e a.rovidnd at A ratio of one spaces. Bicycle le . i acke ehaU D,1e traffic. The Planning Divieio Loyale rack types. Drive -in use queuing areas :;,,;,,_, Minimum number of accesses: Minimum accede width: maximum access width: Pedestrian access must be provided areas, outdoor common areas, aaa; d tween entrances and park3:hg Far detailed information on de ign ' requi;rements for parking areas and y 8. aecenea�s, see Community bevel � � � sent Cede Chapters .18.106 and 18.108. VISION AREA The City requires that clear v ision .be maintnd betwn a nd4 t feet above grade at road/driveway, road/railroad, d road/road inter sections in specified clear vision areas. The site of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street e e functional classification. ec, ; LANDSCAPING street trees are regeai ed private otreet or a eway more must he placed ei • er within the property within sni3 feat of the rig have a Minimum cal pew of two e trees should be spu -, , feet Fa rttb er i iforer a tion on regulations recommended otrcaet trees May be oh developments ha i 100 'E pub ng . on a public or n length. Street trees right-of-way or oa private -way boundary. Street trees must at four Above ., a�t apa de ending on tree site. ffecting street trees and a i.s.a of iced frot the Planning Division. A mielimd► �t ono4 twee per seven packing spaceaa mu at be planted in And around paring areas in order . o provide a canopy effect.' Landscap>r�d screening of parking areas frx view from pGabaic rights -of -way must be p rovdsd I ag4k 4 ButTERIRG AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to reds -e er I3lir&tnat, x adverse 104-1La0 eg - visual i mpaCtE>r between adjacent develorpaentisr , d- ��>�C i.a7 �. betwQeai dif fesant land uee9, the City requires 1andeeapec buffer areas along Certain site �t � the Code in terA.iU5 of 'r:staetei.�+ Required buffer areas are described �' width., Suffer area must be occupied by a mixture eciducUe and evergreen trees and ®,arutoe Site obeoUring screens or €ended are aeda Rec aired buffer areas cases, may often be eo p£e by v�getatLon, fences,' R+ee�ut�.red utilities, and sidewalks. Additi d» n)„ inforeaaat equ buffer area mat riala and su ast y be found J. .z �e ••pter� X18. CO and �th g ? oion bulletin on the Planning ,�iqi landscapia; an buffering. Pequire 11 ?duff widths appl. le t • .. r proposal ft. along eeat] . aloe i µ ndary ft. along south ► . sc ary ,... ..... ft. a ng west In .addition, sight ''oba iag sOreening, Ls required along SIGHS be obtained before erecting n ny is available n he C upon frTigard. Permits mint ae �obti A, 'Giai.delinos for Sign Permits" Additional eiga area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign rr©po . al "is reviewed as ?art of a development app1ioai .o1R ,�... • �``�,. '�' § q 1 1*'" r& IAA 41 A , x w.. �1 4.: —1411.010 .. d ItsI,.. d D LANNING CON _area, 101 4t1 I }1). year. -100k Viet ..),ff.Sitic,) Co -e, e G ' lac + 1 �� .�... -44■:* dA/41_, It, frt Lo 564'4. i.' ,• Pte. w _,, .__„AdmLnistrative staff review. Public hearing before the 14nd use hearings ogficer. Public hearing before the Plannlug C aaiesion. .,. Publ4c hearing before the Planning Commisdion with the Commienitn making a recommendation ation on the propo ial to the City Council... - her public hearing is held by the City Couonci . All applications Whist be accepted by a, Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department oo rater at City Hall. Applicatioa.a submitted by mail or dropped off at the ovunter without Planning Division ce add Applications �su�itt after 4.30. P.M. on Thursday will be batched for rocessin with the following week's appl scat lore for prc eeaing. No appl.ication0 will be accepted after 3:00 P.24. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. Wipe submitted with an application eha3,1 be folded in advance to 8.5- by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch t yr t1� :incha� map of a proposed project should be dubmitted for 'at f report or administrative decision. The Plann _ Engineering Division will do A' prelimifa.ry application , ie review of itY�® Division and Will determine whether an complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information l;ar copies of the submitted materials are needed. Th(I administrative decision /public hearing typically wi71.1 odour approximately ly 45 to 60 days after an applicat ;.on is eccepted ale 0,0mplete by the Planning Division. Applications issues or rewiring review by other jurisdictions turf take. additioAta1 time to review. Written decieioze are icw?,,2 within 10 days•of the bearing. A 10 Y p ....pe i s ec�.ai©ne Aii,� apppea.L on thivr matter would day a� a1 period follows all d {, be heard by the -- A basic 0,6w-diagram illustrating the review proceee ie available from, the Planning Di tiaiou . The tended td inform the -conference prospective tive applicant d► the hprii ary C c are p p,. in : -inform p p p� Coat�nunn.ty Development abode reeruirements applicable to development of a particular' site and to, allow the staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development Of the itee The conference and noted cannot cover 411 Cmde aregAiremente and aspects of l good site planning that ehotld apply to the deve3.esg+ment cf your site p].agt p attune f the to �t staff td r vide any information required by the Cede Shall p g the applicable standards or re ire rents, It m mended that a ti, is recto � _ pr ® ®pecti:ve applicant either obtain and k�•easi; the Code requirements prior to submitting ah application. city we to Community Develo eint Code or ask any eetiocis of cit: steef wr lati� p ppi stW�id t k:r :0 is to be A.�aother re =a l.icata.on coral: ®rmr�ce.® re t.rec� if SA submitted rare than six roriths after this pre appli�oation oanferencek nnlieea the Second co exe :^e ie, deemed u►n ea eeddry hY the '_Planning D tivis iOn PRE 9c' t b 8 !' PLAN' zNG 1V1'SIoN P iONt : 630 -4171 Page, 6 PUBLIC The CILI: fi purpose of the pre a► FACILITIES � pplicstiora conference is to: (i) identify. applicable Comprehensive Plan policies . and cedinance provieione; (ii) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (ii:i) to review the application review process with the applicant including identifying who will be the final decision maker tier the application. The extent of public improvemente ..and dedications to be required of the applicant will be recommended by City . ataf f and approved by .the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies, City taff and the public have had an opportunity to review and cow prat on the a!pg].ication» The following aommente are a Immdection of public improvo'mant related reguiremente that may be required as a condition of development approval for your project. Rio sae's° d al The City of Tigard requires that land area be lt dedicaited t,4 the public to increeeeabuting public the ultimate functional sure ®t ~lassifir gtg l ay specified by >o; Community Development Code. Oc." ,e; # v Appr:o rel, of a development application• or this site will require Clijscw dedicat on of right-of-way for • r t[NO\ bi) ' • 9 .0 A 25C) feet from centerline. feet from centerline. 2.:WrTrgi Q e4 Std improvements: street improvements will be • .necessary along .51 mA ,._.�,.�. • 1./ ,�,�,r I .542( eiL 2. Lot.4.` street improvements w ill be nececcar' along. CON .e . el 4 J. Needed street improvements will include 6 7 °a1'• �& c& 1.ft t of pavement from centerliae, curb and gutters, storm sewers, a ,five -foot wide . sidewalk, necessary street .signs, streetlights, and a two year etreetlighting fee. In come cases where ,fit e© Lmpr'ovement5 or other 'necessary public � improvements are not rr-en y ° ;R ractica]., the 'street improvements MAY he. deferred: In the eases as a. condition of development approval, the proper. owner- (s) must execute a Sauce agreement which waives ri honstra` the property owner to against the formation of a local mprovement district formed to '.mpr ove 1. 2, pedeatrianways /ik ay3: this property is anLa. o � inch ].ir�,e located at o s sanitary �sew'er � o th�.e r+ , The proposed w' Al‘ Sanitary 5ee�e3re a The closest dev ted to a� = anitary sewer. t ° rl : elop;tte�nt muss come a aced d v bop exat Bite e.. . . Nw11r +.w•ww.�R.""w'''W"""d' "w"vr�� ' �� .... ... S to no rovemerit e ®tai ; ►�aw ��► � Inc G� e - '�,,i�.. �,�� -4�,. f�,� �..� - 1, t6 'kovt e . A va lay e- wrc ek + k c Page 7 w;/( Ale prier fa rri *,■ 1 I° Th F water ,'bist t ( Phone. ester UUA ' a provides public water service in the area of this mite. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection:, Tualatin Ai'a :Lley Fire and Resettle District (Cc aata; is gene B•�a rchill, 645 -8533) provides fire Protection services with •.n the laity of Tigard. The District should be contacted Riar ioformiltionl regarding the adequacy c ,)f circulation systems, the n sd gor fire hydrants, ot other questions icelated to fire protection. Other 1 gency Permits: •a.el...e11.r ... d�rr.11r..w /�r� TRAFFIC in A g st, 1990 the ar aa� Yes ion County Board of Coruttesioners .. y adhbpted the county-wide Traffic .ti affic mpact Fee ,(TIF) Ordinance and referred the measure to M the Washington County voters c Yn September, pp 2990, the Washington County g ogram throughout electorate overwhelmingly e.t��+r�oved expanding the TIF pr jurisdictions, within the county. This action placed, into effect en within 1 •t $t*creased street development fee on all • new development in Washington County. The City. of Tigard teas, al/.opted the County's program The ° y Traffic Impact Fee program will, collect fees from new development based on the development's A yard, je'e:ted impact on the transportation yet�s4i�.4ns �� pay ion ® r tip�� Developing +Properti,d,A will be re , iredTlF is calculated based on type of they, are peso je�cted to gen .rats, Thee use, sLte of project, and a general use based fee category. The TIP r.hall be calculated at m of building permit issuance. In 7 imitad circumstances, payment ti.arne %the TXF •any be allowed to be deferred until x>tlata�cd of issuance of oCcupa nCy permits Deferral of pau .gent until occupancy is permissible y • greater thaw f515„0004,00., onl when the TTF �.e STORSWs a The Led Sewera g;e A g en � had establiehed and the City ha s agreed to ;, r �. �� ' 3urfac�! Water quality facilities or �+�esnss/a� enforce, Resolution, ,ao 90-43, req: ;ring the construction of on-site water lieu of their construction. The resolution requires that a fee and/or construction of a water quality facility be built. The fee is based on the amount of impervious a ^e; for every 2640 square feet or portion thereof, that fee shall be ° DOL The 3� � cf Tigard determines ee if a fee or facilit shall be built.. t,t, � e01 re r , Y • 4 i.•r.w�un. � °¢ c+. s `_ t i o: en. ems ; !' ; ' a fw +u . f ►.Kr . ► Ir AA, Js, _. D V j e. S ens, r skii e3 +,\; t 6 ' p M w ° � ,. ° d' r l !e" . 1 6+ 1r ' STREET OPENING PERMIT Q No Within public shell tYe te. � h s obta3 ned s a reet o P erring l.ermit fro the E gine ring �aparmnt cL FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS On all projects that require a grading. P lar th applicant hall s" unit With t he grading plan a floor plan fc earth lot h kta l have the elevations o f four camera of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each ]a L. PREPARED BY: ENGI N ERI N G a.. ��—" '�•- DIVISION PRONE: 6'39 -4171 JOtPREAPP.MST Paige 0 • CITY OF 'i";:GARD COMMUNITY DEVELOME 1 T DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the cI ck list Jbelz.w required for the successful completion of your application submission re r'Airemants. This checklist identifes ear et is. 'his sheet MUST 're brought required to be submitted with, your application. .......,.� materials at the time you submit your and submitted with all - �tl�er .��, v these 4t�ema or ap�slacatx4rt, � ,i, p See your° application for further, explanation of call Planning at 639 4./1. BASIC MATER' S. A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authoH,zation C) Title transfer instrument D) Assessor's map E? not or site plan F) pPlic-.nt's statement ( ..: -L-irs - e.f-•- .atcGPe' y-- ewner - &— addrress.s- -tl O ee (H) F a.1 air; fee ( ► ) 6) Site Informat .ovb _showin , (No. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Site itity Map size 5, dimensions Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades Drainage patterns, courses, and pt)nds Locutions of natural hazard areas including: Floodplain areas Slopes in ertt;ess of Unstable ground a) b) c) d) e) fl Areas with high srlasonai water table Areas with severe soil erosion potentiai Areas having severely weak foundation soils Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including a) Wildlife habitafs b) Wetlands ') Other site features a) Rock outcroppings b) Trees with 6" + oalipiAr • from, ground level' 8) ,Lo ..._ . :.. Ires and their uses . .� G].rig struGtl.r 9) Leeatxon andetype of on and off—site noise sources 10) oc,utic n o ` existing utilities f and easements 1i 1; , . ; i d right—of—ways Locatxop► of �� .stxn� dedicated B) Si ►elopmer� , s��tawin (No. of copses ) � P tan � ,..._.,,,; 1) proposed site and st.irround ins proper ^ties The pro 2) Contour„ line intervals ..i: y ^. 9 of all: 3) The location, da:rnena�,or�. and ) Existin & ai��ted streets& other public ways a.} g p and easements on the site and on adjoining properties measured 4 feet •oposed streets or on the site. 'alternative routes of dead QAnd or proposed streets that require future extension location snd dimension. of: Entrances and exits on tI a site Parking and circUlatirn arc,;). Loading and services are,,,,' Pedestrian and bicycle cireseleseion Outdoor common areas, Above ground utilities "' locati�^�n, dimensions F setback distances of all.. Existing permanent ytructures, improvements, utilities and easements which are In sated on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the sate Proposed struc'svi -es, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage fac'.ities and analysis of downstream ce.' 1 dons Sanitary sewer `facilities The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10) The location of mailboxes Ii) The location of all structures and their orientation 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements other public I C) _rid i eP (No. of copies ,.,The site development plan shall include a gradnl plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 'l) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposrrdls, and time of year it is proposed to ;e done: A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) gabsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage se ry . proposals �;ce c) That all problems will be mitigated and how thoy will be mitigated D) architectural Draincla (No: of copies _ ) The sate development plan peoeosal shall include: Y 1) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed . ., p ��d on—site; and .. . „ for use can 2) "Typical elevation drawings of each otructure: ` l of copies _ ): The land s ca ea lan shall be d w awn at the Same scale of the p" y and shall site analysis tan or a larger scale �f necess�r'. a indicate: Descri ..tion of the Irrigation system where applicable 2) Location and h `g gs height of fences; buffers an scre�nin APPLICATION CACkLIST -� Pge F) Loca n of terraces, docks, shelters, ay areas and common open spaces 4) Location, type, Qize and species of existing and proposed plant Materials, .The landscape plan shall include a 1) Soil conditions. 2) Erosion control measures that will Sign Or^awinci Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance With ChaPter 18.114 of the Code as part of, Site Development Review 6i- prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. TrR f f is again t tames H) lmipr a ,,p �: = t line ad `ustmentmap shcwti o (No of Copies subject parcels 1) The owner, o f j 2) The owner's.. authorized age ?) The map scale, (20, 50100 or 2 .�00 feet -i. ) , inch nortll arrow and date L Description . boundaries ar tios t. and names �,f streets, . width an bau��sements and cra taon of parcel. �ocat��n and Location, wa.d other public way: within and adjacent to Th parcel Location of all perman'nt bul,ldings on and within 25 feet of all property lines Location and width of all water courses Location o' any trees with 6" or greater caliper at a 4 feet above ground level All slopes greater than .256i , :.. . C g ity easa eats 1 . partition which 1.reates Location of existing ut�.l�'�-e:. and utility � "oar major land p - ... � y location public street: a) The proposed right—of—way loc and width C 3 b) A scelerr cross—section of the proposad street plus y r r.ip 12? Any o. .applicable l icabie deedrestrictions 13) Evidence that land partition will no % Preclude ��icient future land division where applicable Subdt,visioh im nor ' „plat map ai data showin (No. of Copies 1 ) 1) Scale equaling 30,:50, 100 or 200 feet to the inch . and limited to one phase per sheet 2) The proposed name of the subdivision `,3) Vicinl.tY : map showing property' relationship to arterial and collector stree s 4) Names, addresses and tee kphor:,e number of toper, engineer, surveer, designer, Date of application tin es of tract t tcc'.be subdivided �r - Names of adjacent subd i V i s , on or names Of recorded oWners of adjoining part e].s of unsubdivided land contour lines related to a city*establiqhed bench- mark at 2 -foot interval a for 0 -10% grades greater than 10 9 ) 10) 11) E E E 161 .APPLICATION CHE041$T -- The location, type and size o 11 of the. �he pose, lacat3on, typ following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision) a) Public and private right-of- ways and easements' b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [' c) Domestic water maino including fire hydrants d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater), e) Watercourses f) Deel reservations for parks, open space, and othe e land encumbrances Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and .e sowers � ` 4 �'. r storm sF�we,, s with grades and pipe sizes xndxcat�d C Plan of the proposed water dietr ibotien system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all etreets including street extensions for a •� y limits of the proposed reasonable distance stari.e be' on�a the 1 im subdivision. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right -of -way; t 3; The location of all areas subject to inunou'iion or storm water overflow r 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water- courses and drainage ways configurations, approe mate lot �� The imees ions� r and lot numbers. Where lo, s are to be used for purposOs other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots 17) The location of all trees with a diame er^ 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet abc e ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any 1e) The existing uses of the preper ^ty, includinc, the location of all str•uctur ee and the present vises of the structures, and a. statement of which structures are to remain after platting 19) Su pplemental information including l a). Proposed deed restrictions (if any) C b) Proof of property ownership 3 c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivisiM on improvements C ] 20) existing natural features ipcluzjing rock ►t-' cropgings wetlands and marsh areas, [ 21) 'ef any of the foregoing information cannot practicably b preliminary .. Plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application pathways Other rmetion APPLICATION CH5C tLIST _ Page 4 ONGTIFiZATIoN LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS err! DEP Building Offici,1 /Brad R. y Recorder Engineering/Chris D. Permits Coordinator/Viola 0. SPECIAL ins ,� , rasre District (Pick-nit hoc) VTigla.rd Water District 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 977:: ....�«, School Diet No. 48 ..._. O PO Rex ,00 OR 97075 School Dist. 237 —�- iTigaad) 13137 SW Pacific Sw7. Tigard, OR 97223 Tnalatii.1 Valley Water District 5.501 NW T. ylore Perry Rd. Ti+. and , OR 97223 .1rFEC'TED .5 JRISO]`CTIONS Waah. Co. Laud Gee & Traiaep. 150 N. F3.3»at bva. Sills ro, OR 97124 rent Iturtis Zev I,*artin Joeao►. 41kter Lieet h .1 -- Scott fl.n3 Fred Eberle NikE Zorreson City of Beaverton 11, ilendryx PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 Boundary Cc aission -- 320 SW StaUk Boom 530 Po tlaM 1 OR 97204 METRO ,�. . 2680 SW 1st ave. Port'lanev OR 97201 -5398 DLCD (CPW."a only) 1175 Court St. Mt tlem, OR 97310 -0590 W Other City of Xing City City Nenagea,' 15300 i V 116th Zing City, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego - City Manager 380 SW P. Lake tswego, OR 97034 Slate Highway Divieiod _. _... Bob Boron PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225-04i. 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES l/' / General Tolepbui Russ :Wade 1,4t0 SW ke:rt St. gar d, CR 97223 V NW Natural Gas Scott Palmer 220 NW Second Ave. Portland, 13.R 97209 TCI Cable vimidd of Oregon n !like itallock 3500 SW Bond St. Pottlaand, Ott 37201 Coluaebi4 Cable (Frank Ston ) .�- 14200 SW 8rigadoen Ct. Beaverton; CB 97005 City of Durham — City Manager 17160 SW Uppa! Boones Ferry 3d. Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland Planning Director 1120 SW 5th Portland, OR • 97204 MOT Lidvilen Rabmaea 02 SE _ McLoughlin Hilwaakie, OR 97222 /Portland General Blec l9 :loan fro 14655 sw old suholis Fry. vern, OR '97007 • µ t_. Arse �uaicatiOzin D�a�tro :. ssou Bewitt • Twin oases technology Center 1015 NW 159th Placha 8 -6020 eirtoa; OR 97006 -4886 iuS West Pete Neasiou 421 Stn Oak 1 t. Portland. OR 97204 6. ZirATE AGENCIES Antendu*4ce kiiv. (000T) Engineer Board MLA Health Fish A Wildlife 7-7 Perks & Recreation Div. Subdivieien supeit isot _� Dept of Energy Dept. of Enviten. Quality 7. FEDERAL AGENCIES DivieiO'a of State Lamm (heck 7i &/E fah i5 'tot+I p,w - H,a bark sop l;(a17° b^J; ofr Commerce Da ,.: ll. mrt votftt P[uc Fire Hatrglthfl Other Corps Of Engineers Post Office. OTHER Other Southern Pacific Trent portation Company bungle h. Perfidy, t1 4 - Projeet Engineer 000 NU 6th ',Woe, ii. 324, Union Station Portland, Oh 07209 February 4 , 1993 Robert Gray Robert Gray Partners Xrdc. PO Box 1016 Sherwood, Oregon 97140 Dear Kr. Gray: Thank ,you for submitting the photos ;DBL /Corps of Engineers permit„ and other documentation regarding the work that has been done on your ballfield complex adjacent to Cook Park. Tai information hat; imp roved our understanding of what has been completed ®n this site. Based on this information, ' find that since substantial construction has c �ut'ed oft the ballf ielc`i complex, your City sensitive lands review and conditional use permits for development of the ballfi.eld complex remain valid. Be'auM of this, City staff would not recommend dedication of the floodplain portion .o of your property be required as a condition of development approval on the upland portion of the site. The City of Tigard's Hearings Officer previously approved a sensitiye lands review permit and conditicnal use permit for the development of the ballfield complex on the i loodplain portion of this site. Community Development Code Section 18.130.030.A states that a conditional use approval shall lapse if 1e . o . substantial construction n of the approved plan has _within atte io n not begun withi M d- orieelialf year period. The Code allows for a one year � of this approval period. Code Chapter 18.84 provides similar language for sensitive lands review permits. the Hearings Off/Jeer/6' your permit was a valid final o n al approval on July 271 ` .=� 1990, and the approval period for that decision was later extended throu g January 27, 19936 i e evde�nce you have Submitted Clearly b �anu indicates that substantial construction has occurred towards this development prior to expiration of the extended a approval period. o . permits remain valid, contrary s to What staff had. conditional previously indicated appeared possible last fall (see Jerry offer ®s Decelabee 28, 1992 lettar to you) Also at issue has been whether the floodplain portion of 'this site .. ... - land that . .. can be considered to be devel p d_ t might e ekeluded freta err ements of ght developed land so a� �. the requirements the Comprehensive floodplain dedication Plan a develo r men t pplA4W oion is filed for the upland part 0 of this site. Comprehensive Plan policy 3,2o4 requires the city el:�to - undeveloped land i the rewire the de�'.a�c��.��.on of all .. _ ,� e,;. . y floodplain plus sufficient open land. funs, ee�.wa osess... 13125 $W 97223 (503) 639 -4171 • TDC (r J3) 684-2772 Robert Gray February 41 1993 Normally we would have toecommend dedication of the f loodp1ain M y portion of this site as part any application for development of the upland. However, ° because we have found that the floodplain portion of this s site is currently reader development, the Community �� e Hearings to e cit .afficer Development Department will not recommend to the that the f looslplain area be required to be dedicated y greenway/open '+era space as a condition the approval The i' a subdivision application can the upland portion of i site. 1oodp1ain area may not yet be "developed," but it is s developing under permits which remain valid. Please note that staff are not the final ,- to subdivision proposals, but this decision -makers with regard v,roule., be our recommendation in this case. I asa not In a position to eXtrapolate the } aringe Officer's determination with regard, to the sufficiency of open spa0e in this area from one application that sought to develop an open space /recreation facility to one th at would seek to develop additional residential uses I find it sufficient to rely on the Iearin ;v►s Officer's use of "in this case' to show the he clearly intended for a proposal's Y, t with Pla1 p ®ljcy � s v e 3 to be e judged on a case by case basis. T, A apb.�l ®gize> for any dif fi cultiel that the isatteS of the past few wont% a regarding this site have caused you or Mr. 7aayr/aire . It has not been our intent to cause undue difficulties or delay, but this situations has raised complex issues with regard to the requirements of oYi Comprehensive Plan. Staff has alp p t a. te1ytaken a d n at;ve approach in the Plants requirements for pre- spp li tion meeting purposes While we have been trying to resolve the • dedication issue with regard to . your property. y. our su eiutll of information detailing the work that has been p y led to resolution of this issue on your property. Thanks again for your cooperation I hope that we have c y resolved this issue with regr,>!rd to your property and Mrs�stis�fa:�..� oral toss WaymireffS uspcd ming application. Sin! rely,, Ed Murphy Community evelopment Director' Mayor Gerald Edwards Ken WayMire Jerry Offer, Deve lop ment geview Planner Mike Robinson, City Attorney's office Et. ett n CITY aF.'TICARD C©MMUN)T DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST Staff tv a iC Date _J The items 0 f the che ckJ st below are required for the successful completion your apPlication submission requirements. This checklist iderit�,fx what is required to be submitted With your application• ThAs sheet MUST be brrught and submitted wi•tb , all other materials at the time you submit Your application. See your application for further explan .tiof of ` these items or call Planning at 639- 4171. ITEMS TUBE INCLUDED. BASIC MATERIALS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature /written authorization C) Title transfer instrument D) Assessor's map E) Plot or site plan F) Applicant's statement (G)..L.1.-frat--e-f--propept-wnor-s-er-addriasse-s--wi-thrirt--2-50---f-aet- (H) Filing fee ($ y._..) SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site InforTp.tion showy n (No of copes .__ ` V i c.a n I tyw,tiMap 1 2�)- ...:•�°°' sig & dimensions 3) -C u lines (2 ft at o--1O% or 5 ft for graces > 10 %) C 3 4) ,Drainage ns, courses, and Ponds s ) e patter 5) Location3 of natural g tt�!^al hazard areas a.nc5.uc1 r� a a) Floodpla'in areas t ..../..3'4' .` "--M-" b) Slopes in excess of 2a% t ` 1 � tits :! c) Unstable ground d) Areas with high seasonal water table e) Areas with severe soil erosion "potential 1 3 f) Areas h43ving sevorely teak foundation soils 1 6 Location of resource areas as shown en the Comprehensive Map inventor) including: 3 a) Wildlife habitats b) Wetlands Other site features', a) Rock outcroppings l 1 3 b) Trees with 6o� 4 caliper measured 4 fclet from grounti iev91, \ si rucl ures and their Uses t 3 8) Location of existing , 9) Location and type of on and off-site noise sources t 3 )) Location of axis ut'' i ties and easements 1 3. +Y�',a2irt N'l fr�w+1W'M., d/..ggL.w • g N 4� .b. 8 i 10) .t�.n ' o ed i cated .r•� �jht -.of= -Wad s -": ` �.1) Location of 2� a sting » �h4._ ,. �A Site Deb► B - �'!'. elotpnnent P�.�Y� owzhta ( .... i intervals �� s \ E 3 �,) The proposed site �'� and surround Ong properties t 2;) Coht�;►ur line s� ohs and names of all: 3) The location, dimensions a) Existing & platted :��:reet i & other ptthjic Ways and ea.aments on the site at d-on atliOining t 3 .�.:. pro.per r CHECKLIST Page 1 , APF yICATI01►� OH � 4+r.a.iwu•J .w.., Y4,104�. nwr !fl • lT. ro�ed' °P .. treats or other ,4 public 'ways, ase�y�ents t ;"' {Ihei. s i Asti ` y a " r . %: "r ., y� i, y:• i , , -; ' ♦ r rout es of d e,.a ad end or o - 3e streets that re� ��e future ��t ens ion 1d The loc✓atian and dimension► 6) tiiitrances and e \7+.ts + ont' "the s�.te R ��d �circ lation , areas `3 b). ; Parking ��d ,. ... c) Loading and services' areas .] d) Pedestrian and ;$ic; 3) ocat 'o terrapes ; ec 4, shelters, areas aiw and': cofimonropen'spaces T 4) Location, "typc, size and spec' "s of existing and proposed r plant materils . The landscape yt';an shall include a narrative which. addresses 1) Soil conditions, 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. spa n ®raNAn s sign drawings ;shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter,;; 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to constru ct the sign. C � G) T r°.i, generation esi imat C ' H) pre I a lot line ad ' esteleht showing. (No. of Copies : 1) The owners of, the subject p-ircelb +. f' authorized agent inch C 3) The Mapesstaalee, h20 50 100 or 200 feet=1), north 3) The map y l � • arrow and date areal location and boundaries s 4) Oescr�ptxon of p names of strut 5) . j and na streets, eaa►emthetsarcel 5 Location, width an other public ways, within and adjacent to p C 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and. within 25 feet of all property lines C 03, 7) Location and width of all water courses [ 3 8) Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground l evel C 9) All slopes greater than 25% C a . land • .. ,. ` •. i kts [ vJ'° 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements 11) For major land artition which creates aapu public ici:s r•eet: W P The pcs∎ad right of -•way loca x C 3 b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed 'street Plus any y reser•ve strip [ 12) Any applicable deed restrictions C 13) Evidence that land partition w ill not preclude efficient fu;bure land division her applicab le � I) Subdivision Preliminar Plat Ma. data showinq(No, of Copies lb ) " 1) Scale equaling c',0,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limibed to one phase per sheet 2) The proposed name of the subdivision 3) Vicinity map showing Property's relatirnship to arterial and collector streets 4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, surveyor, designer, as applicable 5 4'6) ) pate 6f application Scundary Hines of tract to be subdivided -,) Names of adjacent i subdivision or names Yofdrecorded owners of adjoining parcels of UnsUbdi`� +HMO 9) ,cohtou7 .. intervals t. city .,� .h.r lines related to �a Cii. estak�lxshed b he .'� mark at 2 --foot intervals foie 0-10% grades g ate,,,,d than'10% al (2362P/0020P) A ;The 'pur se, �'xlocatierr, ,tipe,'and size 'of all,'t o` rolba (rxtha r; and adjacent' to ' the ose+ p s 1V sior,i a :) hd private rigE-1t- caf• -Ways and easements b) Public and private .sanitary ' anb 'si.urm s.eWe� '' trios c) Domestic eater mains including fire ',hyr; any s d) Major powerr `telephone .transmission (50,000 volts or greater) e) . Wat(roourses f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, path t ays and other land en :ambrances 10) Apprb mate• p1 ;:n and of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with 90A61.6t and pipe sizes indicated, 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves. nd fire hydr °ants,, C, 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing t ►ie finished ` �.�p " is of the 'Proposed r a, grade of all streets including street e*tension f reasonable distance beyond t► liMi subdivision. 13) Scaled oross sections of proposed street right --of —way; [ ) 14) The lc cation of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow C 3 15) Loca&on, width and direot on of flow of all Water- courses and drainage ways 16) The proposed lot configurations, T,pprox mate lot dimensions and lot ; numbers. Where logs s are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots with a diameter 6 inches or t 4 feet 17) rgreatel^� measured la trees aboi�e ground ],eves., �►nr� the location of proposed tree plantings, if any 18) The existing' uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which str9+Fctures are to remain 'after= platting 19) Supplemental information including: 'a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) b) Proof of property ownership c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements 20) Existing natural features including rock out- .1 If ofs the eforegoing informationscanr i 21) y . g . . , - , got practicably be shown on the preliMinah"y plat, it shale be incorporated into a narrative and submitted With the application Other Information 1 C3 [3 Cy C ApPL.ICATIO a CHECI LIST �- Gage, Y ST AVE OF OREGON 3 County of Washington ) s a. City of Tigard �, Ia. lek,64.criik, hain4 J first duly sworn /affirms, on Oath deposes and nay: (Please print That I am a 1.1.11". , A_ 4.5t -� for Tha City of Tigard, Oregon0 That X served NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEADING Fee That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City Of Tigard Plaurnntng Director , ._, Tigard Planning Co mission►. TigP4rd HearingS Officer Tigard City Council A copy (public Hearingi Notice/Notice ach named Dt�� oars' at the whlch is addr " its shown �Q a�aclse��l Exhibit 0AA''° ) was mailed ]' da o the attached list . jQt Y f e Qr� 19,725 marked 1�hi�it "B" ori, the �t r day of � d an appropriate said notice NOTICE CF li�� I�I`1 ma he to � tached, was bulletin board on the 1 Z�. 19 ��,,, �td� de • ,$,ated in the United States mail the a ' day of postage prepaid. Prepared NoL. ce NOT/ C.2 OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIG D HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON TUESDAY, March 19_,...2222, AT 1:00 PH, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: .FILE NO: SUB 93- 0007 /SLR 93 -0004 FILE TITLE: Gray-Lamb/Waymire APPLICANT: a Kennet's Way mire 31835 SW Country View Lana Wilsonville,/ OR 97070 AGENT: Dennis Smith Northwest Civil Design, Inc. 9130 SW Pioneer Court, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 NPO NO: 6 OWNERS: R.A. and Linda D. Gray PO Box 1016 Sherwood, OR 97140 Charles & Zada Lamb 13770 SW Fern Tigard, OR 97223 School District 23J 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: snmsnurgAmps REVIEW SLR 93 -0004 i � AYI IRS (NPO #6) The applicaz� . requests preliminary 1�e�1I�IH �� +� Sirodivision plat approval to divide approxl.Wately 7.5 acres into 49 lots ranging in size from 4,000 to 10,080 square feet in size. Sensitive Lands Review approval is also requested to allow drainageway and wetlands modifications. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 1854, 18.84, 18.88, 18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehonsive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: A portion of the land on SW 92ald Avenue between Tigard High Sc ►.00h, and Cook Park (WCTt+'i 2S1 14A, tax Iota 100 & 1000) ZONE: R-1:2 (Residential, 12 units/acre) T. a A. -12 zone allows singl a- family units residential cave �- facilitiae, publ.lc support service®, manufactured r�omes detach ®d or attached residential unite, duplex and mulitple, family residential � family day care, home occupations, and accessory structures among other uses. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS HATTER TY .WILL PMEIdT CODE AND RULES 10 OPTED . .., .. r WILLL HE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE �P� BY CHAPTER 18.32 C)F THE r�`'O+i[i�J1 "'� v � ULEB Ali PROCEDURE Itti��OF'.CEi THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY BALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30 ,, S H PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN ANYONE WISHING WRITTDN TESTIMONY + PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY PRESENTED AT THE WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT �H'd R3TxNON3l ON THIS G, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL ..,... . x . THE LL BDCIE�iE A STAFF �REPORT PPRESENTATIO THE THHE CIITTYNPLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEPJtING; AND ,T'A 'F ''REPORT PRESENTATTXON FROM .THE Ci s°t;. PL R,. OPEN PUBLIC ARTNG; AND A AND WRITTEN ' TESTIMONY. HEARINGS OFFYCrcR NAY CONTINUE' THE HEARING PO TO TAKE R'DRYING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INIORNATiON, OR CA8E Tom, �� NEARING �co ANOTHER g� ,• ACTION ON THE APPLT�ATION. IF A PERSON Sur3xxTS EVIDENCE IN, SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER '' _:. _ � ANY P�,RTx;:IrS ENTITLED TO RE ;BEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. &3EA�iiI�TCF� IF THERE IS NO �"'O,�T'.�'INU�IN'CE`4�F;A�ITEA �9►�' THE PARTICIPANT IN T HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT ' 'THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR `AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AE TER THE HEARING m j .' 7 Si I, , ti ,r' (I + P 0 t * " "�' ;, , qi' y i I 6 I" t , IED N T IS NOTICE A` LIST F .PPROI TH»^ APPLICABLE A PN • • T R OM T COMMUNITY Ev14 ET C � D ZA COMPREHENSIVE LAN FROM OR, OF THE �� BY � HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE �� OED UPON CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY . THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT RELATING TO THE REQUEST 'PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA • FAILURE .LUR HEART RAISE IN PERSON OR BY 'LETTh R AT SORE FAIL�IRE , TO HEARING ON T� ISSUE _ PRIOR TO THE ' THE IRE 'UES7, POINT CLOSE AFFORD TEE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY . AN A►PI�EAJ� TO THE LAND 'USE HOART.� Og APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. TO THE ZrB� UE PiRECLTJNES t, CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE—NOTED � ALL Btu �.l�a. .�:,�, AT vE�NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR ONNAT NO COST Ott COPIES CNN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SE1)EN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE S' y.APF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR , y 3 INED s'OR TEN NTS PER PAGE e FOR Io�BPg:C'TI�N �T �I'dy COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OH , 634 �'l ?�. TIQ,, �RDNCN�TYOF3AL� '�,231a25��'iP�l'4T' THE STAFF OR ,Ron �oi:jr , AT FUtTS3E&a PLANNING ORGANIZATION HALL HMI. r C CONTACT 'Sf� NEitiN lft�;�Ot Y� PLANK d�) # ��..� • C -I SON: � C a: war . ntlY4s. A f( $440 gal!: 4* ;mow 1.0 Rug, eat 111 ir loam 4,,, . ..., : LW MARTHA GT. �L Oki N� III .bbrr "dpi f114; TIGARI) HIGH SCHOOL: pm IN } a1 R 431 Balm MEM 1 I 111. 1..TRATFOfiO' 8,�N, 1 Ibis,, •a LISA TREAT PLAN? 2S112C0- 01400 •• . •e aM areoa•m TAYLOR, BEAN/BCE _I NOW aA'!C • COLLING , CAS Ttl 9720 SW /MEWING TILT. ID OR 97223 2S111D0-44400 ;is •se•inobseeaea••�oi BERNARD, BRADLEY S PO BOX 23608 TIGARD OR 97223 2811/DC446010 /. �o•as•oawi+n•`adea•• +s 00110, =lean & BAKEFIELD , C81"STIEd'� E 1543 GIBBONS S DR 1 AMEDA 04. 94501 2S111DD .05900 ..................... BCEPBART, WALTER V AND DALE E 7821 IOuS H[DRI�D) ANCHORAGE faIt 99502 2S111DD °06106 0ea1P000000peee41e0.d0• Ss I LL ITTO, JAMES JEROME AND JANET 15900 SW STRATFORD LOOP TIGARD OR 97224 28111D; 10600 ..................... WYSS, SCOTT C AND PA•MEH .A 3 8590' SW STRATFORD Of TIGARD OR 97224 2S111DD- 10800 ii*Ated.o.pee41066444 PERRY; LISA A 8630 SW 5TRATFO CT ' T'GARD OR 972 2S1 1 1DC0 •desearAes•ee•••ow•w• DERNAE , BRADLEY S PO BOX 23608 TIG1 PD ` CR '97223 281I1DC +14500'ba•ssrs•esoe•eeesmeae UOUC, EDWARD I & WAEEFI8%D, "CUR/ST/NE 0 1543 GIBBONS DR A1AMEDA CA 94501 2S111DD -05800 qO•• . e•iOe• a r••aOa HAMILTON, DORIS A AND CARPENTER, LIMA L 15930 STRATFORD :LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 2S1I1DD -06000 re J.ie•eeaae••♦.Y6sewoe HOUSGARD, 3114 L AND E 15910 SW STRATFORD LOOP TIGARD OR 97224 2S111DD- 06200 .. o•J eeaaeaoa PATT. 'RSONa DANIgto 15870 SW STRATMPD xer)oP TIGARD OR 97223 2S111401- i0l00 wooeawabowoweoesieosa FIRTH, INSIR2a1A. to 8610 SW ST'RA`tFORD, COURT TIGARD OR 97223 2S11: q�9 qnQ/� owe. 3.H1�D-- 1tD9a® 6Bio AKAGI, RANDOLPH ! 8 AND T0MIYE T 8650 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD oR 97223 2S111DD- -11060 a44ae4,44440eee4eae 4e4 . ktM00 RONALD s & THERESA L 16.° 8670 SW STF ,TFoRD CT TIGAMtD OR 9/224 281.111DD -11200 , ...ease ...doe eo RUSSELLi PETER A & ETAIN 14 8 710 SW STRATFORD C T TIGARD OR 97224 A ,ti 2S111DD-11100 44,40404404404.4 44 ee NAMDAR FRANK D &SUMMER D 8690 SW STRATCRD CT TIGARD OR 97223 •Y 2S1140A-01100 e••sw0• ... �Y••'w WHrTAM/DURRAM -HALL PARTNERS 1101 S. WINCHESTER BLVD .' SUITE G-181 SAN JOSE CA 95128 28114A0 -01302 a •go•eo•oe•e•o•wo•oo THOMAS, JOHN .. Y AND SALLY PA A 16575 SW 5TE AVE TIGARD . R 97223 010 2S1140A -•01103 0• •wYeeae• UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY 150 N FIRST ST HILLSBORO OR 97124 25114A0' 01300 OY.Oe .w•eoei�.000.. o TEOt ns, JOHN M NATa 16575 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 281120.01300 ....... e o ........ • w ADD7 NGTYONe VALERIA , 0 fit JAMES P & yvoNNE L 8465 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97224 eeoew 2S114A3•00100 •••oeo'00000000000000 2S1t140D -00101 O.O.Yedeeeoe•w.•Y00I1• !Iet0x, JOHN 131'A BARRY KNOLL HOUSTON TX 77079 28111s� q D0 -07400 ...... ..... 0000..o. ,tREICK, GEORGE & CLARA E 9105 SW DURHAM RD TZG,' RD OR 97224 2S111DC -11700 e••••••••••••••••• FREEMAN, EUGENE D /EXLEEN E 15850 SW OAS MEADOW LANE TZd ARDD OR 97224 2S111DC -11901 oe..•ea. s. o DENNELv ARTHUR G & JEANETTE 15880 JW "'`ltd MEADOW LANE TIGARD a 97224 281!.4AC -00.00 oe. o.we a oeoe••• MITCHELL, DANIEL B & CANDACE M 16585 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD OR 97226 2S114AC -00000 .wea•40 TIGARi';, CITY OF 124w0 SW MAIN TIGARD OR 9711J 2S111DCm11600 ..................... DALSILLIE, DOUGLAS H AND LORAINE 15850 SW OAK MEADOW LE TIGARD OR 97223 28111DC- 11900 OOo •e w•P.Oe•1lw0.O DEN a, ARTHUR G & JEANETTE 15880 SW OAK MEADOWS LANE TIGARD OR 97224 28111DC -12000 ........ •• STOW, MARY E 15890 SW OAK MEADOW LANE TIGARD, OR 97223 u • e o 'o • a •I 25111DC- 12100 ow.. e.bw.b »•.. ••••aa JoMN.ON # ELDORE M AND DOROTHY C 15900 S F = OIE klli7'J'W LANE TIGARD OR 97223 28111DC 12200 . .Y .000•.! .0.•006 GREENOL ItAt#11 W AND MARILtr 15910 SW OAK MEADOW LANE TTGA.AD OIIY 072S ke vzzL6 up aalipiX _ IS VEX/1YR MS eSZ6 417 V73HVi OR' i SHOr °JtVagnliP Do960-MT.T4T CZZ46 U0 ahtaa HHUICIM MS OtE6 ■Ifarl HVA 2XXIOUVO umV mcaNT slazargazelon eZgl.6 1151P••••••••11•T'OfPP*, 004g0,477,4T5' Z EM6 WIG u4v0II no77111 M5 0946 S XUM aMV 7 NIAvv iNasolir ootizo-wrvusz vazi,5 110 adVOIM AIua maarixw ms ozz6 • Natmx amv it 17.3.03s svarizne 009r00...aVVICTSE EZEL6 110 avv0II MAIRCI H377I1 MS ST-7,6 V EI7nr auu xavN '11,3aT3 .........../......... ooszo-ovvElsz • • • ••••9•••• VF;440 )4o alms'''. VC( MSTIIN MS GZ6, gX2SNEZ172 lotgV unaxgg migraos •• 00VM-dTVITSZ EZZ66 110 auY0II 1/lad(' l7n1 as SS76 0 aouvo s 0 X11201 stadia.aVc1 00EzooTTsz T • • ••• ZzELe no 0,11403[70 • OHE6 MS tAtV91 7 a63%':' cuw • 7a'ava 1071Z1 6 lgEto -Gut/T.1E0z P0*•*• 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 EriZi6 30 adUOXI amE6 MS SOE'r d G311,1 'HOSASHridd IQ UOTSI• CIUZ,S, MS SOE9T ✓ aaaa sa3safima7va 00ETO-3VVITS71' VZEL6 no avV0Ix GHZ6 MS S609T VSV:gf in Milt XHIM sa;d3a06 ° " • ° ° • • • '*°' ° " • " • • ° 000TG-MITS4 'EZZL6 .•" T no uavoIm ad liTHUSZ MS 06g5 ata2ESWELTAIS 39 a WirritXS InTrgjga ***°**°***** 001/00-infrittSt. OSThS Za AX 3 aav7 xlvs ria aNeg,aawa 'mom a 05 S a 'I .110 ZSIESO SaSair! a0 SOMBHO/dOSSIS ONZOIS3114. 3SX .10 diva —*'°•°*°°°**' 00Z00-ffigintsZ EZZL6 '110 OUVOIM WI micerali le °COST, V! vaILLSa MTV 0 doradv Ootrit-oarrtsz , • • • • * • • 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 •-0 •4, To4L6 40 aggg Xv70 lan SVC VaMrl 'InPaHEI7m * •Tom) _Billyinsz no elPvsLeT. A• V OMZ6 MS ('ETS,T • svKoza sm.Tallaa °° OOTTO-aUtTTSZ SZCL6 ITO unv0iz aEy GME6 MS SET91. if ROI:elms an I D GMODirdll "Wm= 0Q1;00,....ffentsz EZZL6 no aUVLIC, SET illiNg6 MS SLO9T o soranyv s 7 Rauuno an/aTe 00"*"°'°"*°"--****'' 01E0e -3VVETSZ EZZL6 no adV01■11 one as SE091: Hall$UTH sidT7TS WM Nam ‘evirrau-ninam 0. 0•• ••4 **.'4*******. c)0/00-1vg,ttsz VEZ46 tuavoia, H7 MOO7OM XitC) MS OEGST VWdON V n H3Or 'ImaaoaT.07s *•*********-..*** OSEZT-DarlicsZ 2S114A —097OO css,�ee.oel.m�� +.e`o�u CRRISTE.NS.Ela 'POILIP V AND AVRRYTAMP, L i latRIE 9262 sw FINATUA TIMID OR 9722; 2812°1 AB- ,09900 • e. . a• o.. MARDI, PAM JATEANNETTE 9232 SW MARTHA S`' TIGARD OR 97224 1;1' 2S3. 14AH -4 CO ,J • • /U • N q •..4 I. I .... • • o e . PALOUO "Z , JOSEPH AND T E ESA TIGARD OR 2S1114M- 100�00 T......0......... m . a •iORNAN j RTh Id 9222 mi BART ":°TGARD OR 97223 28114/c.2.°16l00 e • o► • d + • a �i . s . s .. s .. • LIF�BE, 13RET1' W AND LE('NTXNA. 9217 S; MARTIIK TIGARD OR 97223 2S114AE- 41300 . .0. o.•e•e..m• BL EVXW 3 =RIMS 0 BON N8, SANDS[ BLEV'INS, GEORGE V 9237 00 2ViRTHA ST TIGARD OR/� 9722aill 2S114AB -40500 e _ ) w w • . e N . JL 9257 SW MARTHA ST TIII,ARD OR 97224 2S114AE 10200 o.1,•w4..e40•06.e6e6ee4 KEMPSTERs HAROW 0 AND SHIRLi.Y 9227 SW ME" THE ST TIGARD OR 97224 2S114 AR-10400 000.000040000009000410 HAZEL, LARRY A /JOO!iNIF 2S 112P.D0.'00400 .. 6 6 it . to al .. e . v .. . tBOLTEOUVE, FREDERICK K NANCY d6 Ai1�D At 0Y L 20120 SW EDP RID SHERWOOD OR 97140 2S111bD- 0500e� e•e..Inso•. ••e.o.wee BAYSINGE ;, JERRY R s IG 'ENO, DONNA .M 1001 SW StAdMXT VIEW DR PORTLANDOIw 97225 251 a • ■)D ,00201 e . • , ....... ,v ......... PIAC" NTINI, JOHN & X',QUISE #19 BY J & L PROPERTIES C/O NORRIS, _ BEGGS & SIMPSOI' 121 SW R0RR .SOI ST #200 PORTLAND OR 9.7204 2S 1 1D 0050c . ... m . • ... . v RITs , WXLLIAM AND LYNN 10095 NW LEA Y PORTLAND OR 97229 ..2SIIIDD -05100 3644 4,444 4406•406 WELLIAMSON PAUL j 7422 Swi3GitIA AVENUE PORTLAND OR 9 219 2S11IDD -0! 20C! oe.enl.fieti ..e.e oemige GALLIUM BRUNO J JR & ';'IIL1N4' THOROARSON , EYSTEIW' G PAMELA 5250 SW LANDILAG SQ #3 PORTLAND OR 971211 251 1DD-05300. ....... .'. . YI, C;HONG Ri} 1I /C'E fONG SON 15865 STRATFORD :.SOP TIGARD OR 97224 28111W-0540a 0a R^ 54 aiSoem..e.eb re..e...eiy ?Rim � N 7559' � R ES, LEWIS M � Rn RAINIER OR 97048 2S111DD- 05600 .346466.04 DORM1ai0, GAS A & J1 R 5830 GOLDWM ER DR CASTRO VALLEY CA 045:52 ��i]U v ...7 1 DD 5 00 .. . __ e e .1:11�DA`D550Ci r..eaeac..000e•.. LEII1ANi LEOk N AND LUICIL►LN 14650 S 144tR TXCGAR D OR 97224 2S1:1DD -05700 :. e. y... BEE:SE, DORA To 15925 SW STRhTFOMD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 2S111DDa09300 .,0 . w • • 1 . 0.0 e e . w ,► 0 LVA GRRTU, .. HET 4jD `UHALEB 15935 15W 87TH. TXGAU16 OR 97223 231ja9" g95o0 KiHNOMON] , ALIRMEa Za A e • a 1 4� • i e • • i !r s • s • • • 13975 SW 87111 VIGARD OR 97224 2S311D4).... 9700 0e40s0e040e444044444Y4 JoAcHxms, RAYMOND LEROY AND JULIE 1" 8696 SW sTRATFOI D CT TIGARD OR 97223 2S1I1DD' -01 9OO .. •U (J 4 0 . ® • w O 4 O w, O ci w.Ri ► BROWN, GREGORY Mi ANti CATHERINE I 8655 SW STRATFORD dT TIGARD 9R 97223 2S111DD.40100 .tiuina•oarX >....eedP040 JUNGEV D. tirERBIUk AND SOPHI'' 8105 SW 68TH F-':c .CE PORTLAND CR 97223 2S111DD- ]I.03O3... n e .. ..... 0 ►HOAGd KATaLggN 6565 RN STRATFORD TIC Fib OR 97223 2Sri11n9- 105001 0 . y. . w i ..... 4 AMD7 JtSON JON S /WRE ?IY I� 3570 SW STRATFORD CT TIGATan OR 97223 KENNETH WAYN IRE 31835 SW COUNTRY VIEW ELAN WILSONVILLE OR 97070 DENNIS SMITH NORTHWEST CIVIL DESIGN' INC. 9130 SW PIONEER COURT SUITE E WILSONVILLE OR 97070 R.A. Si LINDA GRAY PO BOX 1016 SHERWOOD OR 97140 t+; �s111/dD-ov400 ..................... ERICZSON, TIN R AND MARGIE 15955 87TH AVE TIG L OR 97223 23121DD -09600 aded•�o.ossmd�0•o•... DICGS, DONALD W ANA! DIANNE E 8715 SW STRATFORD COURT TUGS OR 97223 25111D0 -09800 •...........•.......• IrRED.D, MICHAEL A, SADL R-4 DD KAREN 8675 SW STRZL.FORD TIGARD OR 97224 2S111Z* 1O®Oi Oe. 404444•4iiee•aOSOwY. HAUMSR, GARY 4* AND SAN L 8535 LW STRATFORD COURT TIGARD OR 97224+ 1S111DD.40200 •pru ►,.6awfi. e• t•e . WEAVER, GEORGE N & PLMEL L O 8555 STI STRATWORD TIGARD OR 97224 2S111DD .40400 . FULCUER, JOHN M /SANDRR L 8550 SW.,ATFORb OT TIGARD OR 97224 Cf.4.APLES ZADA LAMB 13770 SW FERN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD SCHOOL DIET 230 13'13,7 SW PACIFIC HWY T I G A R D OR 97223 SUE CARVER 10:55 SW HOODVIEW DR TIc ARD OR 97224 2S,14D-O0100 JOHN SALLY T 1OMAS' 16575 SW 85TH TIGAnD ok 97224 at II, 281140A -01100 ..... • 231140A- •01200 oa•••• • • • a • • • 28114A0- -01302 �..•••O••. •0•••••a THOMAS, JOHN MURRAY AND SALLY PATRICIA 16575 SW 85TH AVE TIGABD OR 97223 AS3.1308440O600 .. . q• a 4, aloes ... t o a 251140D -0010 •OOq•.•Oa11 @OO•• /r •U•.• 2C114AC.00600 . • .. ...... . HICI(OX, JOHN 13154 BARRY KNOL L HOUSTON TX 77079 23111DC 0 400 •0004•404e 3tisme•eo.. IREXCA, GEORGE & CLARA E 9165 SW WRHAM RD TIGARD OR 97224 ® %°• ,� 23111D —11 / 00 s . • i. e. e. . e e. u s e 0 m e • PRLEIANp iGENE /E=TAEr 15550 SW OAK "VADOW ,ANE WtOARD 0A 972E 4 MIN 2311,11, 1,0- 11901 ... .. • . • DENKEI , ARTHUR 0 & JEANETTE 15880 SW OAK 1AtY,OW LANE TIGARD OR 9722 2S11ibC""121O0 Mossoloosinsse jONNS N ET 'DORE M AND 16900 SW O KNEADOW LANE TIGARD OR 97223 d'• 241140A -1 . 5 ... • •'• •• • t o J • • • . c o • 2S1i4A0 0130* • 0 THOS, JOHN S {�� SALLY P 16575 SW S5TEi AVE TIGARD OR 97223 231120001300 ADDINGTON, VALER7IA G & JAMES P & YVONNE L 5 465 SW DURHAM RD TIOARD OR 07224 25114A0- 0010E o.owmo•.so••e•enamoos 2S1,14AC�O0500 .•a• ••.•..aaa Ma••. MITCHELL, DANIEL B & CAND CE H 16565 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD OR 97224 25114AC- 00700 W ••. .m. •.c .. TIGARb a CITY O 1,2420 SW MAI N T /GARD OR 97223 2S111DC. -11w00 •466 .40644444404umoM4 BALSILLIE, DOUGLAS H AND LORAINE 158500W OAK MEADOW L TIGARD OR 97223 2S111D6-11900 44 446046414646.464e4 DENKER; ARTHUR G & ∎IEANE: "S: 15080 SW OAX bitAbOWil tAttg TIGARD OR 97224 444 2S311DC- 12000_.4 e•d• W...• a e. STOW, MARY E 1:890 SW OAX gEADOW LANE TIGARD 0 #. 9/223 /q... q�p� gns�/yp. •h•.. 2S111DC- 122.00 •..bo.M•I GAERgOI RALPH WAND MARILYN J 149.10 SW OAK MEADOW LANE VIGARD OR 97223 •m 2b11iDC -42300 ...o•e••.a• SIOTHOWER / JOHN R & NORMA A 15920 SW OAR MEADOW LYE TIGARD OR 97224 23114ABJ- 00100 ......oe..e••••• NADERI -ihtEe AD a KAZEM AWE) SALARI, MARZ1EH 16025 8W 92ND TIGARD OR 97223 2SZ14AB -00300 o•e.J.A•o•e•o.e.•eo•�. AtsIN, CHEREE M URSICE C 16075 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 •1•• 2S114)4- *00900 ..bbeo•3.o.• op MILLI R, RAYMOND G L AND GEk itLDINE A 16125 SW 02ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 28114AL 01100 ee.- ..•.e•..••.•;•••. PE,RRIN, TPOMA,S W 16135 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD OR 97224 28114AB- 01201 ►eaisr•esii.•eas•• eei• ALBREHT, LINDA 345 NE CLAY BEND OR 97701 2S1 :4AD -c9. 0 a••.e94•o.•4 4 e.l4 o4 eeo EL Q LA , DANIEL w Y AND JACQUE S , 16445 SW 92ND AV' TI1A',D OR 97223 28114AB °02400 e.edii oe• &oo•ia ono0, SORIA, ARTHUR AND ELIZABETH E 9235 SW MILLED bit TIGARb OR 9/224 2S1I4AB=02600 i8.i eo•a .iaoe•ee.,iie BUT.L ;R, SCOTT A AND KAREN I 9220 SW MILLEN DRIVE TloAkb Olt 97224 U114AB -02 X300 . • ii a .. ... • JANSEN, KEV VN Tr AND WENDY 8 9260 SW NILLET TIGA OR 97223 M RCHETTI , ARTHUR C AND ESTHER A 18930 SW 'OAK MEADOW .DRI TIGARD OR 97223 28114AB -00200 e••.r••or,e•.e•`••es• CORPORATION . OF THE PRESIDING BIS} OY /CHUR4i Oil JESUS CHRIST OF L D E 50 E NORTH TEMPLE 22ND FL SAA,T LAKE CITY UT 84150 28114AB-00400 4.e.41e.04s44ee•e0•04` PUTNAMd, WILLIAM E & KATHERINE A 9290 MW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97223 26114AB- 01000 e . ••• 0.0 00 ..o0 POPPERT, MARK R AND LA DANA K 16095 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD OR 97224 28114ABe- 01200 ,,}c.. oe. •• ♦• ••••• b:� ERLENEVSCH, RED R 16305 SW 92ND TIGARD OR 9/223 2S114AA- e01202 6es •e• s••e• ;e e•. ERLENEU'SCH, FRED R 16305 SW 92ND TteMtn OR 97223 2S114AB -02300 o••e•eeoo•:oe••e•e•.o. PACKARD, KELLY 0 & CAROL G S255 SW MILLEN DIVE TIGARD OR 91223 26114AB -02500 on .m.ecn••oo••oe•.00 HAOLEY, MARX L AND JOLxid A 9215 SW MILLEN DRIVE T/OARD OR 01223 2 8114AB- 0,2700 44,4,0446046i oP e.• HOLZWARTH, BENrON ANL CAROLINE VAN LOO 0240 SSW MILLEN DRIVE TIGARX OR 01223 28114A3 "" 09600 44644446444444,046446 UHWA `d (10H 1 L ANA P1 l4ELA d 9262 SW D!DAtTHA 591.' 'tt'ICaARI. OR 97224 w41 134 • n 1,4 7 • • 9 ob 2E1114AB..09700 .41 CARISTENSEN, PHILIP M AND AVERRA !dP, LYNN MARIE 9252 SW MARTHA TIGARD OR 97224 2S114AR..09900 •e ae,ue••ies•G VELARDI, PAUL a /JEANNETTE 9232 SW MARTHA ST TIGARD OR 97224 • e • e e • 9e •e e • 28114AB -10100 eeuwee•••.oeete•••o • be I.IEBE, BRETT W LEONTIN31 9217 SW MARTHA TIGARD OR 97223 2S114AB.10300 meeebe•oeeas•eeYeaoe¢ ;ELEVINS, CHARLES D CLEVINS, SANDY BLEVINS, GEORGE V 9237 SW FIARTHA, ST TIGARD OR 97224 2$114AE- 10500 000000004000400000,460 EOSCH, HEINZ 9257 SW MARTHA ST TIGARD OR 97224 r.9 q. .p 1 q� 2 S 11DD -00400 e b a• �e b 0 e• e e• e e e e t i! G i/ a BOLTHOUSE, FREDERICK J AND NANOY L 20120 SW EDY RD S SRWOOD OR 97140 2s111DD• -o�oo® aedeo8ieiieseee • idi•I• BAYSINGER, JERRY R $HIGENO, DONNA M .001 SW SUMMIT VIEW DR PORTLAND OA 57225 2S1111x'D° 05200 eoeeoGel,edlea /ebse e CALLIANo, BRUNO a JR & WILMA D EYSTHIN 0 & PA1AEta 5250 Spa, LANDING SQ #3 P"CTLAND OR 97211 28121.10-05400 a .. a • e » • a REFS, LEWIS P & CAREN E 75597 PRICE Pp RAINIER OR 97048 28111W-44-06600 y JEAN hN R 5820 OQLDWATER DR CASTRO VALLEY CA 94552 2s114AB-Roloo ••• ogee, 000114611100 PALCZZOL6, ZOS ?KPH A: "13 THERESA 9242 SW MARTHA ST TIGARD OR 97224 28114AB -10000 •eo•e..... •us »ese.",e NOR'N, BRIAN IAN T9 9222 SW MARTHA TYGARD OR 97223 2S114A .10200 ose •se••p •e•• •• MPSTER HARO1'; D G A,ND Sf., YRLEY PS 9227 SW MARTHA ST TIGARD OR 97224 2S7.14AB- .3.. 0400 •eeGOaee•ae•aeeeeooie HAZEL, L ARVY A /JOA I]G 9247 SW MARTHA ST TIGARD OR 97224 28111DD -o0201 •e•e•••die•nessee • ds•e ))IAOENTINI, JOHN & LOUIOE 119 BY J & L PROPERTIES C/O NORRIS, BEGGS & SIMPSON 121 SW MORRISCA ST #200 PORTLAND 97204 2S1 L1DD '00500 a • o s U •• e o o•• e e• s VARITZ, WILLIAM ADD LYNN 10095 N!' LEAHY PORTLAND OR 97229 WILLIAIWON o PAUL J 7422 SW VIRGINIA, AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97219 2S111DDb05300 o ebii 1Fw•e eoeeee.. 'A'I, OHO TG N M /C''HONG .AEON 15865 STRATFORD LOOP TIGARD left 9~'224 2S111DD-..05500 es e1, •e•e •e• »sag s» LEINAN, LEON N AND JU ILLE V 14650 SW 1441R TIGARD OR 97224 e•Oe• .2S11.DD- 0519�Yi.. OeiteO »•e.000ee60Oe••4 SEEH DOi A L 15925 ':S'N STRAT>ORD Jt.:fOP TIGA D OR 97223 8l1I D- 093OG m �yyloyyo AND il�dlIAN-GtGf�,iA , KEAVIR ,C t LAND S V�389�1LO, 1 159$ SW 81 t2 TIGalio OR 97223 •••e• 2S11iDD -oi4 DO •. ••.•o•••`d•.•••••M; ERICKSON, , MARTIN R Vet COTE 1'955 87TE AVE TIGARD OR 97223 .., ,SA3.130.4 9s�c�a q1 o • 6 • • a p. e A to • • • • • 4, 1011,140M9NI qr ALIR,'S?A; .4 975 SW 17li ;TIGA OR l" '97224 2sii .DD »09710 •yN•P`+•8•••••1 :470ACHIMS, 'RAYMOND Z E .OY AND 4359 8 1 91TRAVFORD C' !TIGARD � .On 99223 25 W11DD-09900 4op •••• . • I7R , GREGORY A AND :bDatERINE 8655 SW STRATFORD CT TIGAt2D OR 97223 253.1,3.:rD.1.10100 • a •, 0 b• 4 w••• h a b s•♦ o m e b JUNO1(IND, ':+ R a' R AND SOPEIE 61eS SW 68TE PLACE PORTLAND OR 91223 2S111Dd./°010300 4 • tl 0 • • b • ' • • • • • 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 HOAG, KATHLEEN a 8565 SW STRATFORD TIGARD OR 9722:1 „ �,.�a.,.1 .,1 „T.1py /y.G/.�,_. - -• o m G o m m s:.D ± i..e «... .. »...._..» »..4..»... 27111 ►D -10500 -.” sc•••sm.,c Al DNHSON# ' JON s/WtNtOr kl 8570 SW STRATFORD et TIGARD OR 97223 •�9 • 28111L1D1 -096Oc .0 60000061000000000 DIGGS, DONALD N AND DIANE H 87,7.5 SAT STRATFORD COURT TIGARD OR 97223 2S111DD- 098 00 .644•44•44.14444440000 FREDD, MICHAEL A & SADLEf ` 4E0D _ KAREN 8675 SW 'STRATFORD CT TIGARD OR 97224 2 11y 1 D INL0 OJV • 0 •c.••66• roo6•eaar • BAuX1R# GARX fliND SHARON L 8635 OW STRATFORD OOVR TIGARD OR 37224 2Si;11DD -10200 4 4 4 44 4 4 4 .4 444 m•46 WEAVER, GEORGE W & PAMNt4 C 8581 SW 'STRATFORD . TI°oARJ) OR 97224 211i1DD -10400 ..................... '`iYLCHERy JOHN M /SANDRA L 8550 8 _1 TRATFORD CT TIGARD OR 91224 • 74 • 2 2511200 -01400 •d•�•a••'•o TAYLOR, BERNIECE .I nar 1 A'B'M CHARLES W 9720 'SW FREWIN0 TIGPI D OR 97223 .2511 .DL-44400 c.......... BERNARD, BRADLEY S PO , SOX 23608 TIGAPO OR 97223 411•00••• 28111DC -. 0 ••SS00 05I••••;I BERNARD, BRADLEY S PO BOX 23608 TIGARD OR 97223 • o e • • • • • �o. (' Ni 26111;0- -14600 oesye••eo••••••e•• • BOU'C n EDWARD 14 WAR FIELD, CHRISTINE 1543 GIBBONS DR ALAMNDA CA 94502 2S111bD.45900 ........ ••••••er•eitOso KEPHA/RT, WALTER F AND DALE E 7821 LOTUS DRIVE ANCHORAGE AK 99502 20111DD.06140 •••.•ie•.o.•ss•.o•.•e 81,IILLUTTOs JAMES JEROME AND JANET G 15900 SW STRATFORD LOOP tramp OR 97224 2S111q. DD- 10600 o•eee•i•••e0•••d••oe• WYSS, SCOTS C AND PAMELA J 8590 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD OR 97224 28111DC41400 • BOUC, EDWARD M WAKEFIELD, CHRISTINE B 1543 GIBBONS DR ALAMEDA CA 54501 2S111DD 05800 i0•e.o• se HAMILTON,. DOR'G 3 A AND CARPENTER, 7400R L 15930 STRATFORD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 2S111DD 06000 6c eeor•oii•••eeen eao• HOUSGARD, JIM L AND JUAN E 15910 SW STRATFOAD LOOP TIGARD OR 97224 2S111D12o°06200 •∎ie•o•o.•seme•0505551 PATTERSON, DANIEL A 15870 SW STRATFORD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 2S111DD -10700 em•e'•drs•aoaee•o•••roi FIRTH, MARTHA L 8610 SW STRATFORD COURT TIGARD OR 97223 281110D- 10800 •a•a •a PERRY, LISA A 8630 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD OR 97224 28111DD- -LaC00 aooeo edo .eaotf•••••• KING, RONALD S & THERESA A 8670 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD OR 17224 2S11iDD ''11200 3itd19Ob AO •• • O RUSSELL, PETER A &' ERIN M 0710 SW STRB TFP9ia.L1 VT 6.1 `. TIGARD OR 91224" 23111DD- si0900 •. • b••.0;n• cs •• AAGI , RDOLPH S AND TOMItE T 8850 SW STRATFORD CT TIGARD OR 07223 2E,111UD=41100 444604006444e4660iiO4 Ntea•, FRANK DSSUMMER 8690 SW STRATFORD C`P TIGARD AAA 97223 • y r _11444, . /.01_4b). „1.' 4,,z41.1.0zaa,leato,i20„v2o..M60 2G t224, - j_3-0604_5004 sub be) e) ompo Kok 100. rt_ �.,� �. . _.... ?„ . !kV) 9100 utu 1 4 O. a-d wip rawmaxp.w.mviamaa.m. nn 23494 214..1 t6 • . seas_ •• Kt 4; : s ed es area . �.� N. �' :' vlu 1144 300 2 Y ,� �o .� Sac.a A� a ��. ° 4!Z " a di 44c. t 1700 ;:,. ad 2 13 I• W 11s • ...kg C45 611416 ate- .. 103 t: x.04 _� 140 30 1 { 12000 5-. i - 1a1V 210.13' a �.13' i�i13.y 943.3 ? 0 C I• .J.7' � ..r i-4.--.- mr - !tea _)r e - . �g� I1AL P �' t ' a: @'o.: �+L/ 2 � 12600 125 12 •i2 1 O0� 1 j �:a �. 2S2 �' ! 12S �• 11 Ida: 121 12z J : _ ? 1 13400 474- Z. *.tscirr A ST Ell° g Viliefrwlif 4%34 nets stri Oriiir"."7", # M 10900 1=0 SC 1 IS 13t 2 113 8 1� _: At 3114' 43,14 p® 29 Alc 140 I ea, 43 = t' 43 i �., 4:1:33 10/ S0 - 3' : f 10233' 14200 $141P0 $ 1.4000 13900 r 1:3: 1,11 105 sl `_ 14Z00 - 41, OP kre SEE PciAP 2S °1 14 ti 5100 vi 93 79.33 -. i,_ /11.3111 - ttvt sip S1lAVR�R g 37 r IT 31 le RIS 7 24 8a4a• SEE MAP 2S114AC 14E 3.4.0 bi, 400 4' 6'61 ' mss, ZOO, 2i 44414.00 s44 t.9r s`'9viH eps 1: r7Ja�Da�Ji ( !WE) a44O) { . 9,3371 tt4 6a MIS FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY (kTHER USE. [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] NW 114 SECTION 13 T2S R WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE 1'ig'1600i .50 • [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] c, ru gac zf 7411 4O'r, 3) SEE MAP 2s1 II DD 78..19.° 4S R1 t rio RD N/S NOO. Wig& DISTRICT 25 376 302 ZOO AC. 414741:443414 111=NA,..••1111Tin co i 23�78 C tC .1: /4 $ C .zA:e . tT - EEC MAP IS 14- • ti ?-s DA' 'T,C a March 4 1993 wommoomplom FROM Tigard Planning Department � 211r4DIVISION SUB 93600® , sm Tr nt;Pl�rA)' � tm agr, SLR 93 -0004 CRAY - aO °WAYMIRE (1P #6) pp qu preliminary Subdivision pM aat approval t o divid e approximately 7.8 acres into to 49 Iota ranging in l a 4,000 to 00 fart in she. Sensitive Lands Review approval also requested to allow .1ra�f„�rnageway and wetlands modifications. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Con lunity Development Code. Chapters 18.54, 1884, 18.88, 18.92 , 18.100, 18.102, 18.180, 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1,1, 3.1.10 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 1.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATIONa A portion of the land' on SO' 92nd Avenue .. t The , tax lots 100 & High 281 �i. between ®n ZONE: Tigard 12 (Resident Cook 1 A Park /acre) 4 R-12 L zone allows single - family detached or attached residential unite, duplex and mulitple- family residential units, re/IJidential care facilities, public support sorvi.cee, manufactured homes, family day care, home occupations, and accessory structures among other UMBEL Attached is the Site Plan and pplioant!'s etateatent for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and fri.am other information available to our staff, a report and recommend tion will Y';! prepared and a dec;fllrei. to :1111 be rendered .n the proposal., in that near future. If you wish to comment on this appLicatioug we need your comments by Magi, 1992 You may une the space provided below or attach a separate butter to return your comments. I f yo u are unable to se® m'nd b etkn®. ah date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writatrg ack soon as possible. If you have any questiona regatrding this matter, contract the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Ball Blvd., 2i> and CR 97223. PHONE: 639 - 4171.. STAFF CONTACT: YRon Pomt m _ PLEASV CHECK THE HOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY a We have r viewed the proposal and have no objection to it Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: of our office. Phone Number: zwrau, .+ a.b Piro District . (Pick• -uP bp=) Tigard Water District • 8777 SW Harahan' St. Tigard, OR ' 97223 Tualatin Valley d7aaler District 6501 SW Taylors Perry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 Avirgoaro Ee' IOflS wAsh. Co. y Land Wee £ Tranup. 1,50 W. G9smt Ave. tit r)e v'DR 97124 tCartt' Ravin Baran n gat, it ---- Scott King 1_1- Prod Merle City of Beaverton ••� �,••• pia! Ilex iryX 4755 a eavertmr OR 97076 City raThaof wig city 15300 SW 116th $inj City, OR Ci'I�{ o: Lake Cnwega ...� City Se 300 SW A •Lake Oswego, OR 97034 State Highway Division Doh Dor= HO Box 26412 ' 2 t1a7 d, CRt 97225-0412 "a. SPECIAL Aa -.j/ Conoral 50c4Opholute as gam .. 12 0SW *0 St. gazd, c 97223 WA iganturnl. Call 6� C Pe 'iris . 220 ,Dri ii, rood AVO., Trost» ,tadudl, OR 97209 tee' CaablotriSion of Ord gal - t4iko Witch 3500 SW Hoar! St, Pot USIA, OR 97201 COlaaoabic Cmblo mid* storm) """r ;4.4200 SW DrigladOda Ct. Detavurtcsa, OR 97005 6 B"1°.1iO3 mum= ,tortsissitiOS Div.. Qom) ilag i:®90 3aa d 0f Delth ---7 Pita* 6 Parks a Re tiod D v. Subdivia1Ou Sup e r1Sor a.,..... Dept. of *Meta Dept. of Envison. gaoaoiity 7. f' eDE1thL Z CENCYES Corpn. of Rng{itioera Post: Office Southern Pacitio Transportation Company Duane 3l i�c►raoeyr Pf.S Project Engina ®s • 900 taw 6th lI ,eh40,.,.Ra 324, Uniolu Station Portlaia*d, OIL 97209 Soundary C=1111110.010111 320 amt Stark Room 530 tait 99204 !0 • `°--°° 2000 SW let eve. i? , OR 97202 -5390 C (CPA's iiely ) arwd.... 1175 Court. ... Cou St. tm9aoa- City of Durham .d,.b City linittager 1N7,1,,60 SW apper Bowels Perry igerd oa 97224 city of Portland Planning Bisector ?1120,. SN .oth • ia' t'p, OR • 97204 Brian ore . ' i.4655 SW *Id tamale Pry. [moos l`itly • pge� o ini ti .-.._. ewitt Win Oaks WechiMalogy ter 169tA Place Beaavest, OR 97006 -4606 VS treat Pete Belson . , 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 91204 u: State Llts (fJCk / t £ Aa rt $uP 01! cemaM.wa. H ®pia M11*. Park Alom (tma040401c. 0L1to eat HAMLET S ,W. 1 'M r r 4 WriVERL,Y CO • TEL NO .1 503 694 2599 UAL 07 ?2 4 : 25 P . 02 1018 SW Tnisco in A Ibsn , OR . 97881 -800 (608)926 -7828 Al Phloem of Landscape c traoth*g General, Sod, Sesd, Trooe and Irrigation every► Construction 00m0anY Pi country view Awe 303-694.5503 wermour WO t,K I QC4iION Waverly 3ste�tee Iiie moo Township 'south Range ....,.- �....- .tea--- ...,,;. west et the Willamette meridian ''�" , INULTMURIAL E.t ®1'r R Oorfun atoloniferel 2 Oorylus oaretutat, 4 dilbite rubralaihnomsmmOtemo 4 .. phatioar ., ROUX q anx obn utae ne+sr !ttuaii a � o 544Me. a, IDa► loltdtAltae 341# prTansial trao 80' !1 16 -i6-i4 tertili ev, �....- .ate..,. oampost t ul.oh (all trees and 'drubs at least 2411 tall) ! 2I CRUD ION or Wo RtlN flat` �rsv,; and Shrubs en nary "b beams at male 4rid nettR tEIe 'P :.:°tt hextte,'Cie it9t eeld e ellIe»ta 1° the b"tam or Miele sad pondA pond 2aattet plea oeed and fertiliser* 41 ribex tree shelters will be added to 4 Alms i bt°ap A 3' diameterlooloh ring ring will be added to all trees &At shfuUs, „v. 11.1.1...... de* ,, 074 0401 3/31/$ torlitt—Tmen OobtrL i'YaN RAM 3/,'10 PaUOE : ENT BD Dili ii iiiejt0A2_,Ajakci.1 'Agnja_lignz, We char d to _ell &tard+,a Roo ©unto. liekt 0014144re Tots Xlit !Atilt. etb t. cp+eittilO weutente c mo 411Ii 00l meet or il{o®bd Chi tionlers ollserivt ®e miol,ecj a►bai 41eeihtrnb oy 6%4 wsnNiti y, tiv44.40 ie . title wart®uiy+ le veld it w�+8lieglitib iY a Ign4;ca f4 eoaa&teoth Ooaaraotoro Baum, A:ogon Dat this AUOIlkott, ytoebuad. t 11(he t do to Arad ecodntid tba Nute6ay tltoatt laptld. I eo Lveker bUI 0i i •rprk ole . th ted,.etl to.ik¢'v i% o@. �pau+h;abl l i ot lDMde Pe Nil erhen duo. tLen tO {etaedi tiotlndo� by th eio4- LikvOis#06 57M io, ohcne eia.i e. 116444e c'eo47 'frees ared/ar dltsrnba ti i. be of cased npnead tibovehly to give a mere haturni appeatabOo to the l+innting ttaleot. Yea May still waxtt to tt ®e t ®ire plaints areUna the tone aaoek. It 1o'`, oe► t au94 bare root to ee andiat iahrubs tar 412 Bath planted,' or 019 ear.h gat z e n1 ety ac�iteiner pl tdi. i dies pleete bah be added �'or 07 m Oath if 1 1SasW by hedid tc!!®r .� The - rf."iz rAins &sae was located in -this drawing AO - e.c ' .(ta on Us proposed afiltration and l‘stlzood pitxgat ca p3za.a n ly Northwest .Civil Dasi192t Inc. ° job 7h° 1 -95e NM x i92$ :sheet. -16 et `19. The actual mole aray be _locate& lecher em li bat mortanade ler approciumt,41.7 85° and will he laantad ss 0=4p-wally Vii.,:piea. j, ,rte � '�' vita shrubs ash .trees in thee' saes e t a retinas, Wit: vi der density ty CB 'trees . /Gr `' twtcold o .6L - WET ulna fritErr Roberta Waymire Waverly Construction Company 31835 rW Country View Lane Wilsonville, OR 97070 Dear ' ['s, Waymire: Thank you for your 'le,iter of March 15, hope I clarify p 1955. I ho e � can cl the intent of our past �� o communications. The ` letter received the 13th of March wa3 mailed only in follow up of our co telephone � • nversation of March 7. I believe the letter was received late due to an error in the Wiling address. The City inspected the signage protecting tine wetlands and finds that they . Condition signage was supposed to be �1t1.� • 1✓�I4 issuance r�� fy �� '�� 007 subdivision approval. 1"he adi�oii i#i� of SUB p r to o l ui,tdin permits according to the Hearings Officer's Final Order, provided i�o� t � p g g Now that it has been completed,, the development is in compliance from a planing perspective. Thank you for your prompt response in this matter. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (503') 6394171 x315. Sincerely, Will D'Andrea Assistant Planner cc Dick Be iersdorff Bill M onahar File h :\ Ugin\vviillwaymircJet 13125 * Mall Blvd:, li and oR 9723• t503) 639 4'.I71 `DD c50 rj 6: OM Q bilarch 13, 1995 Mr. Kenneth Waymire Waverly ConstrucOun Company 31835 SW Country View Lane Wilsomille, OR 97070 031.�F TIGARD/ OREGON Dear Mr. Waymire Upon a site inspection on March 1, 1995, it was that Condition #24 of tht Hearings Officer Final, Order (SUB 93-0007) has not been sa f id. condition states; the appilimt sh ll ixat ll a nim n six -foot high fence at the no edge of the required f � install the fens at the north edge wetland. berm or � north. If the applicant does not open spare then the applicant sh l Est si- identifying ._. the edge of the of the �i��no�� opera 5p �� P� common (\Pen space and prohibit development, clew, a filling! or tree removal in that area Ludes approved by the City of T fi red Planning Director, Neither a fence nor sip were found to have been placed along the edge of the wetland buffer. Pursuant to our telephone conveisation on March 7, 1995 it has been agreed upon that signs wetland March �. �' letter posted edge buffer by Frnday, is to shall be sted al® the �d a ®f the �►.,�1 i issuance of Wilding Ito and eert;�ate� of inform you that a hold will be placed on the m�ditxon has not been s�. *��e�d March cc L cY 'Waverly Mates if this co by occupancy f ®r all hi a 10, and shall remain in effect until this condition. is satisfied. The Plannin Department will need t o sign off ®n your plan for com p liance and verify implementation prim: to issuance of new building and occupancy permits If you have any finer questions, please feel free to contact me at (503) 6394171 x315. Siu erely, jYa7� ,Gte will D' Andrea ,distant Plamier Dick Bewersdorff i :\o$aai°aeyi[1iwnayzniirjet 13125 SW HHoil 130vd., Tigard, OR 91223 (503) 639 -4111 'tom (503 i• CIE£ . .4W hange 1 e1ete A&i ' eplicat selected nate and' address l3DXVXSXON �' 93 -0007 PROJECT: TI E P -__ LtC T. Z(ENETI WAYMIRE ITE AbDRESS: a1W 92ND S N SflB93 0.007 KENNET SUB93 0007 N S93 -0OO' SUB93 -0001 SUE93 -0007 $1 4193-0004 PL SI`I'93' 0021 CON SiT91u O02I APIA ENG94- 0001 ENO ENG9 4 -0 00 A02 ENO94-0001 FIRST 1,IAME:KENNETH NIA.......': NORPRW LAE P !SANE.: WAYMI"' E GRAY, , Y EESS31.. :31835 SW COUNT T3 r ADI)RESS2 SCHOOL CITY .. a .; ' WILSONVILLE KENNET STATE.... :ORe KENNET ZIP.. ...: • 97070 . WAVERL BUS PHONE . t694 -5505 r'WAVE� HOME PHONE: i� . B . W INDEMN VIEW r ; March 7, 1995 Mr . Cen Waymire Waverly construction Company 8735 SW Curry Wit' onn 11e, OR 97070 Dear Mr. Waymire, 111f OF ilk! OREGON a siteinapection on ' March 1, 1995, it was found that pnd� Hearings Office Final Order (S.1B 93 -0007) has Condition �atisfied. This conditi•n states: applicant shall not been s The applca. install a minimum six-foot high f . nce at the north edge, the required wetland buffer or furthe - north If the applicant does aot install the fence at the no edge of the common op eh space, then applicant identifying the edge of the ant shat tan- y r hen.. the a l�. c� and oh�.ba. evelopment, clearing, grading, . r a f .ilin or tree ' approved by common open space :�,��Pm,ci�ra'l :.. unless a roared b the l�"d`�Y r "� : ee Neither ~ence nor s�irnS were found to have Planning ]3x.recto,r: been paced along the edge of the wetland buffer. Pursuant to our telephone conversation 1995 it has been on March 7 , p posted g. . g of the agreed upon that Signs shall be crated.; letter is tor��.n 0 wetland buffer by Friday, March 10 This inform you that a hold will be placed on the issuance of building permits and r ..� f icates of occupancy, , for all lots .n Waverly Thst es, if this certificates P y .. h 10 and shall rema =in in condition r G � by March e � effect until this condition �.s sate Sf ie3 The Planning Oeparttt+,e�t c + °andit�on ha�i not been satisfied � wi11 need to sign off on your plan riM compliance and verify imp1omentation prior to issuance of new building and occupancy permits: If any t- q. please act me. you have an f �A� ther tie��t�ons lease feel free to contadt 4 ni9A z' tit A will D °Andr' a Assistant Planner do Dick Bewersdorff 13125 SW F1c B1vd, Ti ord; OR .974045001. ,.5031 6344171 TDD 50 tS • • 6 September 29, 1993 MY OF TIGARD, OREGON Kenneth Waymire 31835 SW Country View Lane Wilsonville, OR. 97070 Dear Mr. Waymiree As a result of your telephone call Monday, September 27, 1993, reviewed your request for tree removal related to future sever line construction for SUB 93-0007. I also reviewed, your tree removal permit signed by Victor Adonri on September 20, 1993. In consulting erth city engineering staff, 1 have found that they have not completed review of your revised public facility plans. As a result, they can not determine which, trees would have to be removed for sewer line construction, In addition, the permit !granted September 20, 1993 indicates that :pet must provide a plan to protect those trees to remain. To my knowledge, this plan has not been submitted. • For the city to grant tree removal permits for sewer 'line conetvection, it will be necessary for you to provide the location of an Engineering Department Ittng.., line location citeaAeni the tree survey map. We will then be able to determine which trees should be removed. You are encouraged to remove only those trees that are absolutely necessary and plan to retain as many trees as possible according to Chapter 18.150 of the Community Development code. In may discu ssion with engineering staff regarding the site and plans, they indicted that site grading necessary was minimal and the need to remove trees on individual lot e was not necessary. As at result, I am hereby notifying you that the tree removal permit granted Septether 20, 1993 shall apply only to those trees within the etreet right-of-way. According to Hearings Officer epproval of SUB 93-0007, condition 21 calls for tree removal permits on individual lots; to be reviewed "in connection with the construction 2tnreAtnidenqes." The intent of this condition is to review tree removal based on actual, individual building plans not general grading. In addition, condition 20 requires identification of trees to be removed during rough grading. There appears to be conflict between what you have submitted for tree removal relative to the amount of grading to be done. We Will need confirmation from the Engineering Department regarding the amount of grading necessary and whether that grading neceesitates removal of specific trees outside the street right-of-way. 13125 SW Hall Blvd„ Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 IDD (503) 684-2772 Wt . 31835 SW Court View Lane litilsgonville OR e 97070 apologize !or p inconvenience, inconvenie e, but it clear . - �ha • and the R+ aringg Officer approval that : unneceswy =nova trees should be a � a We will � �� with y� Uf , otter mine whi ch " trees should be removed. prior co coon of sidences 13125 � SW Haii Blvd„ Ttgar OR 97228 ; C803j 639.4471 '► 03) 684- !, October 20, 1993 CITY AF T96 D OREGON Kenneth L Wayrnlre Waverly Construction Coe Inc. 31835 SW Country flier Lane Wilsonville, OR 07070 Re SUB 93-0007 /Slit 93010 "The Park" Dear Mr. Waymire In response to your letter of October 19th, and our discussion last night, following is what I would propose In order that you may move fore d on your project. If you agree, please sign at the bottom and return one copy. You may remove only those trees and vegetatkrn necessary, to Install the erosion control me g cures. You and committing installing the full erosion control measures within 48 hours of staking the work. This allows you to get mecsnical equipment in to Install the erosion control, Instead of doing it manually. You agree to provide financial Security In the amount of $5,000.00 that will be available to the (lity for construction and maintenance of the erosion control features should you not install the erosion control protacdon min 48 hours, or install it in an unacceptable manner, This security deposit will be reimbursed upon submittal and approval of the full performance bond_ for the construction Improvements. Once the erosion contra! measures are installed, you may proceed on with the rest of the necessary tree removal and grading, as per your approved plans, Before you g however, you will update your grading plan w David SS sin . "work, ®w Building Official, You will also need to have submitted and approved a tree i prOtortion plan to prteet the trees that Will not be removed. - tile criteria of the Development .e.nt �" To sad �,. Code din 1 �. � 50e30 ��e, I will siot�pt your proposal J p a trees either V" in diameter � minor adus ®nt. p p® f . . _ . or mils be . _. you �,q plant 100 .. . ,... and . ...:.. . al wig or tall a_ t the time of planting. Approximately one-half will deciduous and the other orl . evergreen. By �... building . _ ._. , ®h��f will be over re�ih �. the m � . iin�e we issue 50% of the t'r'aits of the _. gib. � y ...e_ is ems trees will have been installed, � the time seas building permits; 10Q9� Of will be installs rd. Or, if you wish, you may financially secure the remaining trees to be planted ot any time, • .113125 - Iv y Tigard, OIL 9723 (503 i39- 417°9.. TDD j . .,... $1f1� i�v�i B (503 X84 -772 --- To start, the following must be provided: y ShOgir ue you ,plan on protecting , a that will not be rimed, 'end have It approved by Victor Adonri. Submit a sow* check for $ with a letter ng Its purpose. 3, See David Scott to update your grading permit. 4 Sign this letter. ' a Let us know when a you Oet 0 on starting y' nue of the Engineering inspection (contact � � r � ��n�� the r �fi �s �°s +� Ire the ,, # the erosion control is In ply, en h e r removal and rough grading. By way cf this Serra the Stop Work Order Issued by Ken Schriendl on October e, l3 is rescinded. you questions, please call me Thank you for your cooperation. If V have Ed Murph erniwayntrige Randy VV ►Isy /Gary Alfson .. . 0: Dick wersdortf/VkktOr Adonri . r1 • TREE ROOTS Most tree roots are in the top 1 to 2 feet of soil. These roots are vital to supplying the tree with water arc' nutrients. Tree roots often grow far beyond the dripl ne, often as far from the trunk of the tree as the tree is tall. Even as little as 1" of fill or compaction of the soil will kiln. roots. Compaction can be caused by�. construction vehicles, repeated truck � p or car traffic and ear 3n stockpilin. g construction m .teriaho. Comp action occurs quicker on wet soils. Broken roots are entryways for decay organisms and can lead to the trees death or failure. Tree death or failure can occur 5, 10 or even 20 nears after injury. ✓ Tree roots cut with a saw are leis apt infected p t to � become with decay organisms. Tree roots damaged or pulled from the tree with construction equipment almost always cause a larger wound. ��np��t a sr..11er area Make 0m41l0 rNOUnds; Prepared for Kenneth L, Waymire, `VAT a�,ver y Constriction Co. Enterprises, October 20, 1993 Prepared by Michael Ry 1�,eichenbach Arboreal r• TREE PROTECTION Damage to the root systems of trees y, the most common. problem found on const 1 1ioI.z sites. THE PARK development site has a TREE PROTECTION ZONE. This area �. � � fencing, � ' and will be �o�.� -� of the erosion control �e�ci�g: vehicles construction activity should not occur beyond the Erosion Control Fencing /Tree Protection Boundary. Different tree species react differently to damage to the root system. The following lists, from most sensitive to least sensitive, some of the more common species found on THE PARK development sits Oregon white oak While this tree is not common on the site this tree p.a one of the .most sensitive to construction damage Douglas-fix, Western redcedar Large roots, ever 4 inches, often provide the tree with support. Damage to even one of these roots may lead to tree failure. The root system is typically slallo;tw. Big leaf maple, Alder Roots often intertwine, strti: ^turaI roots are close to the base of the tree. To work around tree roots and m n.]imize damage remember: Damage o of a tree to be preserved is° to more than �o f® of the ..root area o _ severe and may cause the death or failure of the tree; a circle damage within. ycle with. a Avoid damage to, filling over or cutting. tree roots w center at the base of the tree and a radius of 20% of the height oft', ,� tree. OR Avoid damage to filling over or cutting tree roots within 5 feet of the dripline on deciduous trees and 25 feet of the dripline on conifers, Cutting or filling over roots over 2 °' to diameter should be avoided:. Prepared fors Kenneth L. Waymire, Waverly Coroltr cti n o. Prepared by Miehael Reichenbach, Araoreai Ffteipnses, October `20, 1998, �,. Reyehe Prepare4 for • The City of Tigarti. Victor Adroni. Development itssistant Plailger 13125 SW Hll Blvd Tigard, OA 67223 503/639-4171 Prepared by "chael R. iteichenbach Certified Arborist #114.0117 • Arboreal Entervitises 4422 Norfolk St West Linn, OR ',47066 503/65/j-7835 LEGIBILITY STRIP BACKGROUND At the request of the City of Tigard City I Tigard site visit to development known as THE PARK on Wednescla,r, October 20, 1993. I have experience wit :a preserving trees on construction aites and am a Certified Arbor .t, #IL 0117. I was a ecom anied by Victor Adroni, Development Assistant Planner for the City of Tigard and Kenneth. L. Waymire of Waverly Construction Co. The development site is approximately 8 acres in size awl slopes to the south with several drainages running roughly north and south. The area is being developed as single fa .y residential. The site is divided into two sections by a line shoes on the Tree 'rotection/Part al Erosion Control Fen, ing Plan, This line is marked in the field by stakes. Trees north of these staat nay were not inspected. The currei::t plans show r>ri at tree removal north of this boundary will be required f;►r grading. Preservation of trees north of the line may have been preserved if the lot layout mac h\ use of the existing topography. GENERAL GUIDES FOR MINIMIZING CONSTRUCTION DAMAGE TO T REE , Different tree species react differently to damage to the root system. The following is a list of some common species found on the site, In order of most sensitive to least sensitive. These include Douglas -fir; Large roots, over 4 inches, often provide the tree with support. Damage to even one of these roots may lead to tree failure. Western red cedar Similar lar to Douglas-fix Big leaf maple Roots often intertwine, structural roots are close to the base of the tree: Alder Similar to Big leaf maple Oen.erol de gui.� Ines for working around tree roots and mitolinizing damage to the tree are as follows: Avoid damage to more than 40% of the root area of a tree to be reserved: this may re of the tree; p y cause the death oa. failure Tree Preservation Ruotglietidations for THE PAIM Page 2 Pr p area by Miehael Fiknter .,rises for The City of irigaird October 2( 1693 Avoid damage to, filling over or cutting tree roots within, a circle with a center at the base of the tree and a radius of 20% of the height of the trek. Avoid cutting roots over 2 diameter; Avoid filling over the root zone of a tree. tree root:. Even one or two inches can I. roots ned to be cut, cut them with a saw or root cutting machine rather than ripping them free with the burket'of .a back hoe or other . piece of construction equipment. RECOMMENDATIONS During the site visit wo specifically discussed measures needed to preserve the trees South of the Vree removal boundary. Most trees are far enough away from the boundary that construction damage to tree root systems will be minor. However, some damage to the trees may be expected regardless of the tree protection measures used on this site To mini aiw,e derma ;e the following general recommendations should be koll ©wed. Keep construction equipment and cut or fill areas at least 5 from the drip line of all trees to be preserved: Somme conifers, as noted under+ specific recommendations, will require 25 of undisturbed space beyond the dripli.ne ce Inbrin all construction workers of the need to protect the root, systems and provide them , with guidelines for preserving g trees in the tes ,ax,a, e. � ee form!, protectldlia zone This infsarxnation. can be provided 'Y ..: written �orm!,, however' , written mater. al may be ignored. An alternative would be to construction workers to attend a brief informal presentat.on require all cox►bst�� i about trees and tree roots. 1; No unmonitored construction activity should tak ; Aace in the area south of the Erosion Controlincee Protection Fencing . On the attached map, critical areas are noted in red and numbered to correspond: to 1 Presentations to construction workers have pro 'en successful en large projects: fur lame projictsi the following outlines once tnet lied of ensuring that all worlceva ure informed: Tree and tree root information is presented at one or More sessions, Attendance by all constriuctlor_ tti ;alzets is permitted on the job Site without e' deuce of L viug attended le presentation: erf'inee tter�imposed for violation of this toquirorneo t, Tree Preservation Recommendations fir THE PARK Page 3 Prepared by . ®nb Bch, Arboreal enterprises for The City of Tigard, October 20, 1e'�3 p y Michael R. Jl�eYe� specific recommendations. Construction activity will be necessary within the 'tree protection area to msteee. swales for drainage. A tree protection plan should be developed for the areas to be impacted. As with all plans, implementation should be closely monitored. Label the Erosion Contras lfPree Protection : d encimg in the field with yellow ribbons labeled tree protection zone. This ribbon is available commercially. No construction activity, parking of vehicles, or construction equipment should, occur is protected areas, and Monitor the r onstructi.on activity to see that these recommendations and the specific recommendations are implemented. Specific recommendations are as follows: A 1. Regarding two westurnred-eettaratrees, mar ed as number 1 on the :,tap: The tree protection zone should be moved to it least 25 feet outside the dripline to protect these trees root systems: 2, Re t�, , i� , Regarding two Douglas txer...s, �� end 42 ma�rked as number 2 on the map The tree protection ,zone should be moved to at least 25' outside the dripine to protect these trees rort systems. On some sites crown thinning, a form of pruning, is recommended to mitigate impacts to the root s y ,tem. On THE PARK development site pruning should not rye required unless cut and Ell activity or other construction impacts more than 40% of the root sys +,em or roots over 2" in diameter are cut. The initial grading is not expecteel to cause such damage. SVM. NARY If the above recommendations are followed as described and shown. on the attached map, damage to the trees South of the Erosion Control /Tree Protection Fencing will be minimized and the risk of death of these trees due to the initial, grading and construction north of the Tree Protection 'Fencing lowered. It should be noted that construction of storm drainage will be required south ... ... .. .:.. , ' , tree h of the Erosion Control/Tree Protection Fencing. .l� ... .. d protection plan should be developed for trees in the tree protection zone prior .y , ,i. to any const�•u�^,tlon activity south of tie Erosion Control/Tree Protection Fencing. Tree P enervation Recommendations for THE P Page Prepared by Michael l Reicheabach, Arbofre� l Enterprires for ` he City of `Tigard, October 21, 199$ i�lr. Victtir Adroni : Development Assistant Planner The City of ,Tigsrd 18126 W' Hall Blvd Tigard,' i 872230 Dear Victor: �: ,� • d. 't' ns.for'��, PARK. Please note the Enclosed is ray report on Tree �'rotQ�toneceia� copy S tl a xee location desCriptiok�-fox tree, �requiring p c. fax copy port ui�n s e. nal. Consideration t�i�. ) • s *as incorrt t. Corrections are noted. in enclosed copy,- . 1• wish•to'emghasizethat the report focaRes Only on trees atia�cenandt,� � � '., zx�. south o�'the, Erosion Controlrfree Protection boundary as shown on the map marked the,l eld 9.) with stakes 0 You indicated t hat the amo unt a£ �, � g proposed for the t r May be mare than necessary. Changing only existing gradin g plans is notlidcly to provide for :1�e ��e `atrie£ more trees Opportunities r s are ` this' for liYese'rving si��xiica �a, numbers of trees north t� lot, grading, and drainage plans redesigned. Preserving thu iw wooded character oo. a site through ;lie development process often requires ° larger lot s;zt oo g and preserving the existing topography of the Site: 0 CO M If you have questions, . 56•/835: bons,. please Ball. me at '6 Sincerely, Michael R. Reichenbach Owner and Certified Arborist IL01.17 attachment: Tree Protection Recornina,ndations for THE PARK Invoice for services WRA:RLV CONSTRIXTION �C 31035 S. W. COUNTRY VIA I WILSOIsfifILLE, OR 07070' Phi 503 ON 55D5 Fix 503 Wi 2b9 s Lim 10 o Fia F :., alacta Copy Iv loI P: will r : ., 1st ua 9,i�9 gads= mf V= �sq +fit Assoso- o County rtity that ooh+et �� Hof eaI o WAVERLY`' • CO TEL NO 1 5A3 694 2599 Dec 01,.94 2 5 : P s 0 oft DECLARATION 'ION Or COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RE i 1CC7O tS rO wA ERL' ESTATES, S, A RECORDED g11bD1 V151QN 1N WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON INDEX loge DI CL Q TION ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS ARTIICL�� Ix. RESTRICTIONS ARTICLE III GENEIIAL PROVISIONS 6 ACKNDWLEDOEMiENT After redo rd* rem to: Waverly oaf stn► ors Co. 31$3 t . d Clouhtiy Vie Lane Wiltefoliie‘ OR 97070 msaei.: rwa. uwaew�. rnww�as. w�+.. . w .�ow�.r..+r+rs.sroren+Y'��+'+" ... .... ..' .r1if r..a.i,• -�^� .. . THIS DECLARATION, , made th3 18th day of July, 1994, Zy WAVERLY CONSTRUCTION CO. INC„ an Oregon Co erode ArtER REFERRED "'O A " D'ECLAM' I��R LI N '' � 'WHEREAS DECLARANT iS the Amer of certain real property ih the City of ardl Chanty o7 / ow4.s t...... State of Oregon, mord.pentads* described as allows: RLY ESTATES, + recorded subdlVision � the i�iAtthf �►St ()Weer of Section 140 Township V2 Sou _ Range 1 West of the WIllenteuti Melaka AND WHEREAS 13e ant shell convey said property subf ect to certain protective ns, restric o s, rereMVaett ®ns, eesetnentt, liens and chergei for the benefit i c %�iaraeants conditions, rf sold real propery and Ltd present end subsequent Owners as herohafter Set tom .. , THEREFORE, Last hereby declares that all of t said property shall be+ Sold conveyed .Y . covenants end aai�d�r,ng held, s� � i~�i1�e�1� s»�jeet to the following ®ose � .. , p .... r . _ rraent�restrictions„ v�u� de �Ueteffit+tehd Which are. for the �d reel �� r� �r�► arid �►14'� .. P. .. _ p atlrt vefAess of � p p nts, rest chords and conditiols aserrat+nt�,, ooVer i covenants b run "` o ell poisons i� a a ®nsdtut�: ��orats t' _ with the land and x� t ba binder on . . _ t ire tie v�le�. ed propel or lam' o(+iad under them iar,d � �� ode end9at � "tares �b part thereof, end shell ir►ut� to the benefit of per there gg Q be uati4r�� Upon deg o his heirs end assigns if in individual, or its uo ®ssars and assigns it e partnership or Cbrpotetio t W®Verty ESVites De►r, nation -Page rile. orWeovenedaooi t. .�d WAVERLY CO 6: — TEL NO.1 503 694 2599 Dec 01 ,94 23:46 P.04 , 410 AELICLM 1 AEriNITLO NS 1,1 „Lot" shad mean and refer to ortch of the platted and numbered residential lots within the Subdivision of Waverly Estates. 1.2 "Owner" shy Mean and refer to the rcoord owner, Whether one or more parsons or miles, of a tees simple We +te any lot which is pot of mess described properties, Including contract buyers® but excluding those having such intereSt mereC ti scattily for performance of an obligation, 13 "Declarant" stud mea n and refer to the 'Declarant above, and its successors and asstns if such successors andtor assigns aagelire development interest from the Declarants. 1.4 "ResIQente shall Mean that :structure structure intended to be occupied as e dw'sll g together with attached or detached garages, as the Case may be, and the patios, porches and appurtances annexed tasareto. 15 Do rE Qn " $t3 sbAlvtleari $8C rater to tho DECLARATION or COVENANTS' CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR WAVERLY ESTATES as 0001tsl by me Durant* on ate lath day Willy, /904, 1 "Tract D" shall meets and refer to that lima shown and so designated on the sub- division plat whia is a tore$t preservation and wetlands protet don area owned on eh uridlidded basis by all lots within the subdivisia ARTICLE 11 RESTRICTIONS The fellowing tesaeicdons still spay to all Lots or Retioentioi Lots OS troitomet 2.1 Piet Rest of ohs end abutments, The Use of ail l etident Lots In Waverly, gestates are sublect to the easements and restrictions as shown on the recorded p ;.n4 these covenants, conditions and restrictions as recorded! lti the Deed Records of V ahingtoti County kOtego4. 2.2 Dwoll dine. iy dwelling on a Residential Lot, ►out porchdls and eteges, del The Meth itpar area of ere, shall be not less thth 1700 squire feet Oar es shell be of a Site e o,br Moe alitbtnob es. (b) in the ate of a two Story Al�veD , the lower or ground f h s tc et btu, es and 060 .game kilt , e anal e mInIrnum of 1500 square feet A gait toyer type homes �. _.. n e 0aen ®� l t�ve a nor area of not less iiteat q 1500 square feetExterior Mate31415 &nd Punish. Elttertor materials and colors must be eppdtA, d for use by the Dec erant (4) Btxaetures Pernutted; No i npr r mehts hy be directed or A errraitted o re or arly a e tr r Apr s containing and improvernen ts homtallp ac es oy thereto o . a P tivatet a t� o for use of the o P enrl su tbs1041Ce 2;4 ResideAtel Use. sidentlei Lott thall be used only for teSider tIaI purposes, nt activiti at � eta side the lot end activities anal Only tomtit reside ®s s'l be oasor�eadle a�tt, from a n ha horns of vo r e . of the b p 6ceble City of iecctaandn �o �cn Tigard Ord! ience�5 nc r shell be tooth, egniptherit, -ehl J , materials or supplies used odors With arry trade„ setulca ox basin ®ss bo b�opt or !tared on arty Ft ®sidontiel Lot: come watt al activities relat to ' rtiao tv roi� ( to L ®t. l�o� i� this paragraph sal De doe a R , .- . .. ..fie balder to cons�t� _.. . - .. tie fight of �e Qe�c�T�kr1t ®r an}� oohtractor of ho rental tit U tsd oil thy estdefltit1 Lpr; to stere con si loon rrb�lteriaaS and eg iprtletit on such Y Waverly Estates Dadaration—Pag WAVERLY CO TEL. No .1 503 694 2599 Dec O194 23 47 P.05 • Lots in the natal course of construction, and to use any residential dwelling as I sales office or !o i horcae asr apartment for p rposes of sides or rental in the subdlulgion, and (a) the eight of the Owner of a Reriidential Lot to maintain 010P:050nel persons library, keep perSOnal bueineris or Profeesicnal porSe el recoils or occeu,X,►s„ handle personal business or pt4fesslonal telephen►e male or Confer with business p associates, rs, i b his t her :asI' endai dw lir4 11 or re�iasdtgtt3l e�, �oci$tes or customers, in his or gum borne alibi or home business activities, however, 1 o and corn* with City of ward Cotrrtnunhy Development reguliktfons, 2.5 Leasing and Rental Resticti®ais, Any residence teat is liaised ar reAts:f4 may only Declaration. be so leased or rented on terms re that t),4 tenants be bound 415 the terms .. of this i AR`�P Sung/11.140 on ®very residence is subjeOt to trio following riles and regulations, regardless of wheeler in the tease rental agreement; ¶a) the use of the protnlse is 0400 to the tuios and regu1a !!ens of titas community, (b) the rental unit cemot be red SS r hotel or motel of Otherwise for transient tenants. 2.b Offensive„ Unlawful Activides. No n adous or offensive aia. vines shah take puce on any pan of the subdivision nor shall and be done or pled in same tba'a: batetteres with or jeopardizes the enjoyment of cosy lots which is a source of annoyance to resident No Wiltivittil use shall be Me of a Lot or any 11E2 thereof, and all valid lieu,, toiling ordinances, and re Mena d dies taa ► jurisdiction thereof shah be observed. � re of aai governmental �� o 2.7 Arrlpnals. Other then two (2) houseboid pats, no mss, 1100,W*, l► p raised, bred, kept or oar tOO Wiese any residen�del Unit PO D ion � or ours of any klla4 stall be fads theli be reasotbiv controlled So as not to be a nuisance. PEts shall not be permitted to relit the subdivisions unattended end shell be controlled es presided by city or county ordinence, 2.8 Mairgenance of StruceQ'cs at l Grounds. Each °water shall Stan Qua er'a Lot nd improvements taneroon in a clean end, et acIvs condition, in abed repair aind !;:ere fashion a3 not to create a fire haunt Such mtinte i#ntle shell include paid „ repair, replac4sinent emit e for roofs, exterior building suriacew, wants and other e*trtior bnproysmehts end surfaces. in addition, each Owner shall keep all shrubs, Woes, grass and planets on Ownet`s Lot . ' oe of trash and other unsightly materiel. Dellitge Caused by neatly od Pia di �lalte, rt`t,V or other muses 1111 be the responsibility of a ch Do ver and Shall be repaired within r tteesonabte period of time. 23 00 and Mining Operation; No oil os gas diving or irking operations, of any ldn�, shah be petp;ittod upon or in any Lot, l,0 2��0_ puitire,�. ., of any vehicle Or equipment, including bead, c a, t �`' n p F t be a wed. oti any Ot'�Ea�S Mottle �+;ycle ba � shill not b0 �ocNB.� h0 the ^oefi'�s ur�eexcept ire ®�a� s� ®� esb�Qne� ve>tOclds shy na oh,y ant of pert of the sub �, p ry , F p gyp.. woverly gstatti ti,xeippt only within the fines of an enacted gaitee or stbreened ante ;reject, beyond the swooned area._ and �.:� portion �4 MO s � . Y 2.19. Ve o1es in dlsrepelr. No owner shell permit any vehicle' icle t thet it ts in n extreme r state of disrepair to be abletidoned or to remain parked anywhere in th petted' in eXgess of 24 hourse 12 Sivas Na signs shall be erected or maintained on any Lot except slam' wni ee h e h u b 24 ilio �Jis al wits iii` ,i �a � `y tiOeaaeptht a rlatrei and 4460 e$, Or ate temporary sighs nothrpt mate ao >ncnes by 30 Mote adV erdstng the property for Selo Or Oirit, or aS01.11 OY co y ups n the Sal6 o � temporary de tntttl d�eodx+e�+cn: such tight Witt be rea�otsod !z ." ` for the dwe1lI ig thereof or the cohciuston of the ,community ....s project (OS �, ,� of the esit' aaubil � �; , to .... app ,bled. tee testrictlgns in sragr ph shell not apply! (a) the temp p exit . ar (b) tie placer ant by the Dec ttaaets. or De. (f v0 or Of political sides by stets t�wc� ®r � clarf3 � ®rats e More signs ldent.ty the name of the Des its teld the location of a sale: office and/or Model horns vi a etiy • Estates D ec 'atiOn4ege fimmimmunizememmezwzmitamw. WAVERLY CO TEL NO.1. 503 694 2599 41) Dec 01,94 23:47 P.06 .,e 2.13 Rubbish and Trash. Ho Lot or pry of the adjacent Ti' "ac D' proservat►on area snail De used as a dumping ground or gash of any Lone All langlge bAti waste shall be kept iri opprepriate sefsitary containers for proper disposal and out of public view. Yard ratings, din and other mate* restating from 1andseapin! WOlit Shall net be dumped onto streets or presarNr Rdorra aroa or on any Lot A unimproved fiats stall boo kaspt in a not and orderly cone dittos t r, of brush, vines, weeds and debris. Ares t1 eroon shaft be chat or Mowed to preVellt author oft a nuisance or !lie hazard. 14 Completion of Construwdan. if the De al sell or otherwise convey ':pots to builders, the construction on such Lots must commence within 6 months of purchase and n ewe 4or i ''pr ove non`s tamer be completed within 6 moriM from the boggy of construction. In *e 0vont of undue hardship from weather conditions, this provision may be i,Sttonded for a reasambte length of dme upon 'Mitten approval ironer the Declaim, or its assigns. Thm building area shall by kept reasonably clean and in workrnentike order during the construction tie a Completion. In the CaSe of Lots sold to binders, all lands ' period. must be couplet d in the from yard areas widen nine (9) months from the data of purchase. The remaining findscapit l r f yards shell be donrpleted within six (6) Monts after buds completion. 2.16 No structure of a temporary character, troller, base- men; b31CIlCture. merst, tents gorge or other olabtindinl shall be used on any Lot at any time as a residence either temporally of pe amy� en 2 it Service yards, 8e11/ice yaf'd,3 (wood storage, composting facilitJes, garbage storage, etc.) shall be completely screened so that the e%enaonts screened are not visible kohl the street or adjoining property, Antenna d Sawlike Disks, Satterior antennas shad not be permitted to be placed ' laced upr any Lot Satellite receiver and tra nsmissipn OHM eie prohibited. .n 2.19 Setback, MtudMurtr Height, and lntmunn Yard Reg ts. Lot shall all be sueje� t ®tae setback, n�c�nun height, an ®ninim� side„ and y r d eorit3 established by 0,e recorded plat restrictions and City of Tigard ordinance and to any l$al use review protodUrer established by $W City of Word, 220 Oran of Weiuers or Consents. Except as Specificity provided herein, ty or t, waivers and Consents to this Der. rat on au��ori to grant or oxtet�d excepttoat. l be exelusiu t or its sucoessars as deveiepet , during Such shall y Estates, period its the Declarant or its successors ety � the �ractat�n p seers shit ova any property � Waverly- � 121 Trees Eger than 6 inches in diameter at breast height �t me t.bp removed any without complying with Section 18,150 of tee, Tigert C'ommmurdiy p.. nt Code on an . " ,emoval as prohibited glees a trey is disaaced end there is anger lr�t. Within "'Not la tree r, ar proposed s actu'es er interfere un n waxy sakes, nucn u7etrveytauone�i$v removal shall co el t on 18160 above. 2.22 Development, clearing, gra g , filling or bee removal in the Tract open space, allots t a roved b the City of Tigard. Other than and'cuffer aurae is prohibited tinlesA pp y udts and water quality n7easur e are permitted in q � � es only sots paved pedestnan g . avert Estates ill protect the reset Traci D it i$ wed a�tad that but °a+�i�rs of � y protect .. � n fvau® areas Of Traci anoni genital pudic eracroachMeht to protect the habitatvatuee and tiD trate imiae site disturbances. Z g3 no building cen►struction On any lot 'ti #A comply anion son`a'ol mF�V wig the er . � or► approved . ,. With the Cif; e T ar i ds m easenz plans oh the vn and drainage su9 era surer shoWn , *roam a On the reoordod sat to the C of eta tocross thane► h 20 shall be manta red' s a bitter be e p .. 3 4 � � � �- tvVeon the subdlanlibn rbsadbnce and the eldltin2 � alt91Mrrn to tree Mat. At sued the as the ,daifi, armn coas�es u�r, ►eratior►s it shall Oi no 140 Ea fort* and effete waverlY berates l eClaradon -Peg 4 • 1 0 TEL 140 .1 503 694 2599 ' Oec 01 9 :48 .'P .0' AktIOLS 11 CiaNSRAL PROVISIONS 3.1 Waverly Estates Lot Owners SAO be req, � ed to join r ai a preservation end wetland features of Irract'Dx and he responsfabe for a pro arena f'l re ipr each lot (et such repair, or additions or itnproilinents. Dsdslavis for such inhante. meat or w p *greed by a ority► Cote of Owners of the subdi ision airs the�ll d Lot piers si a Vesperal* say cite sub Lou. �t►sldAi d�, � r� , :®ox b,alds. the try ;, t � bn the tm�nce sion sign lICated nn Lea , 3.1 EnforcernOnt. Mby Owner ahem taus the tight eo e4000 ny itny proceeding � conditions, tesorva ens, ease - moms, orb e� a� rest��on�. co�adi�to�as� ,zns and hor e,$ how or hereinafter Imp ,_!l y p Dec'trattb7 . at � �� ose � the provisions of tld Fi irate by,A y owner to amore cou* t Or Vesj of contained herein OA no even btr, *earned a waiver of the 1t to do so hereafter,y, : u b Inv doh of any Ono of these cove Wits end rocs 104$ by 3 eTac cou order shall in no way enectiny other provisions a'a shell rennin in ia force e nd effect, 3.$ Mieobiong. The covorkints and tesuicdbns of tidy DeOleggda shell rw with end bird the Hand, and shat inure to the benefit of an be enfOrcoable,by the Owner Of any Lot subject to t s Declaration, their respectiver'10441 re reSel tattvess heirs, S61W- "'rl the t19al4f cl9vl�l�!lrlt CQ' censors, and assigns, tot a MTh fiv (5) yeirt lta r I� of this Dal ration ,mass r or in the need Records of Was ton Co eta p. r ®vaker�, s�.�, �soQe��lrr v�� ehdrrtQnt ereOt, be ®utormdesllY extended fee ttrbcetls. ire poriodf) or fivae (5) years. ��Che coven* nts end rest on$ of Aariie 11 row be mended OW 'evoked IN an itattrumer,t signed by not lest than :1 ►!IVa percent (0%) of the Lot iers, r�tVo01I0ik 0r e e 1 Of tit D0clir6drAt ur■Wl � � ltlstt'Ia�fM1��ltS aria . � , ,� �9n� eeordA� � the Deed ecaras�e'� °��io�.� of r ��b�a�a��F �p�� not ba be pr+s�aly � • Sections 2.21, 2.22 and 2.23 in d�rd P , , tIt 1 at nendad or terminated without the prior Written content °.� the City of IA 114 WITNESS WHEREOF, the tvidettigned, Da ant hetiin, het toreinto set their hands end seals day oil ,iV!" a. WA,VERLY ESTATES'. WAVItRg, Y "•V ON T RU `III.T ioN CO. J11 ,, W'vvrri C9nstril ion Co r DECLA T1ON Oi OOVENANT p CONDITIONS AND RES1 1CT IO NS WAVERLY B61414E8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: BATE OF Rg01914 • Pr6Stdar Wrivorly �eYaYe �o� bit SO, i�9o, aA . . � , ... d �e foregoing va ryas Signed .te d seeied in 'behalf .... Co. ,. . and � iced r� Int, Who acknOWiedge . . Q�Ofl�3t�VViC�4on � Voluntary .. e�� Corp Q re�on by a��tn��t� of its �o�� at Directors said WO the of 'do o Q T ^M^ N . ! tdPR91i+C . R OR My . t expires: h+ll co C ®�sron aktoleiY Mitate, beci aittion-4-Pig, 5 tiON ,f- 4„ w..faottt Noire* " thiTM.Y 6'UI' ire - 6PICtaON ,CO ..1MIS IOn� P40,orhv 4 iV? CO MISIION t' (PIF1ES JUNE 29, 1806 P �.�,, a .. . • • TEL NO.1 SUS 694 2,599 First ,an Title insure C Ir tiwweri 641111041 lit' f i1 emit :act rocirmoir O!I i` uG :ti 1700 S . FOURTH AN/EWE, PORTLAND, OR 97251 Y6512 (503) 222-3551 FAX (503) 796.1 or (503) 7904858 Prellivtinory Titis Repo Au u3t 24, 1994 ALTA Owners Stead. Co V. $40 ,000,'",, Prep h m $1722.8 bit ALTA ao ere W. OW. Prsmlum $ ALTA Lander Stand, Cov. Premium ALTA memo ext. tom► ". $ Premium $ Orosr 4o, 'teams Indorsement • 100, 116 i 0,1 Premium Escrow No. iligtasoraic Baer °get 4 Re oan y ©nstructlon Company/ Cwt. Inma A mn l dited rliiatonlient of ail chose a ***non In Ow- nsGthn VIM mle +ord r will bn,roiided et Noolng, First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon 16027 SE McLoughlin ► Ivd. Mllwaukle, OR 0/287 Attention 'Judy Jenkins- Petzer Tg .3phone No.: 65341000 We are .::..re red to l ue Title Insuranc Policy or Policies in the form and amount shown above, 9 iunnq title to the following described land: Lot 18, WAVERLY TESTATE$, in the City of Tigard. County of Washington and State of Oregon. TOGETHER WITH an undivided 1/46 Interest in Tract "D", ALSO TOG THER NTH an .hIhdMMlded 1 /6 Interest In Tract NC`°; and as oil August � 12, 1> et 6 ►08:00 �.rn. ale �:9e Vest WAVERLY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, an Oregon corpora )n � part of such Policy form and the Called to the exceptions; aXCiusioos and 0.loUlations which are ordin rily pa tioSiowing 1. City of the City of TI rr . Lions, I'f any, NOW: An Irlgulty has been directed to !it() City Clark and CUbsetliAnt advIce will folloW concerning erne actual status Of such Ilene, 2, StaiU" i y PoweEs lend Assessiments of Unified Sewerage Agency. Trust Deed, Intl lJCiin� - g the 1011'16 and provisions thertot, given to aecuar july 16,1693 corded Ad ust 3, 11 ae F�5 ADO, g3032333 Re g P �� ctbn Cot npaa'i , en Oregon corporation Grantor w�ve�y Con®trta Fire�t lrroeriaan TItlel Insurance Corn 4ny of Oregon . �. p ttenefle Washington, FedePdi Savings and Loan Association, a Unit States cor cr5iilon TMs ®e Ijelry _ � Lan NO, c r V- 20713550 (CO400 additional proporty) This report is for tt►� exoiaael�� tER." �M• pad ®s h ia�ira Theism itoo Is pre3irriingr to the iO5uai►co or +� tl to In�Airisr:oti poll w �fi�li t� Rtn raidl uril`� a polio ie 9 ®i �di *nd t a tail r ®oniiarra p�icl, WFIVErL Y CO TEL NO .1 503 694 2599 iit,c 01 ,94 23:50 P.09 l'aCile 2 Order No. 762905 5. Trust Deed, Including the terms and provisions thereof, given to secure en indetAldnes,* Of $75,000.M Dated : July 29,1993 Re0ordod August 3. 1993 es Foe No 9306234 Grantor WaVetly Construction Co. Inc., And Oregon corporation Trustee • : riri American This Co. Beneficlary : LS. Henriksen Construction int. (Covert additional property) . Restrictive Covenant to Waive Romonstrerice, pertaining to Street Improvement, including the terms and provisions thereof Recorded : August 12, 1993 kis Pee t.410. 9303806 " 7, Deciaralion o Condltiohs and Restrictions, Including the terms and provisions thereof, but deleting restections, if ony, based on race, c010r„ religion or national origin, Imposed by InslruMora Executed tOttf : Waverly Construction Cod, Inc., en Oregon corporation Recorded August 9, 1994 as Flecoderte Fee No. 9403925 8. Easvrtient as shown oh the recorded' p2/partition For : Landscape Affects East 25' 9. Restrictions shown on the recorded plat/partition as follows! (a) Ali lots are subject to the effects of the operation oftthe existing dairy farm ebutlIng the east line of the subdivision: (b' Tracts We 13", end "C" ere private streets, end tire subject to public denftacy sewer, storm drainage ane utility easement over their entirety and 61..lbject to access easements to the City a Tigard, (c) Tract A (SW 90th Place) shall be jolty owned and equally maintained by Lots 35 40. Tract B (SW Oh Place) Shell be jointly owned and qU&Ly lotlitatorod toy Lots 25 31. Tract C (SW 89gh Place) shall be jointly ,owned and equally maintair by Lots t? 22, (d) Tress larger than 8 inches In dlerneter at breast height cannot be remcried witt--.0Ltt 1140 vecelving tti permit frOM the city pursuant to Tt;srd CIEy C'4e 3e0tion 10.150. (e) Tract 4D0 shell be owned OW Maintained by the declarant, their successors or astirsts, 10: The talowing matters perAsin to Lenders ekilerided 00Ventge only: (a) bisotepandies, eotilliett in boundary line% shortage in area, enotott,etimehta or arty other facts which torradt tiuivoy would diii0d6e, (b) Parties in possestion, or cleiming to be in 05teSsi0 til t;ther then the vestees shown hereict (0) S:totutory lions tot labor and/or F riali hcIUdIng liana for COntribUtions die to the ttete of Oregon for eniploytnent oornpensation and for WOri,•(rtitt'd it)hlperikettion, or any rights thereto, where such ilerts or rights appears of irectird, • It LEGIBILITY '- STRIP, iAVLY lAtigle 3 „ Order No. MOOS NOTE 19934k, tore ; oaki pdor t tho recoroing of the Oat/pantile') ln 'the larno4rit of $8014.10:1 (Said iubdivislonipartNinii at CarleifIta Of 48 1$90,49$ bias paki prior to the riecording of tho' Olatipariltion In the'iount of ie434Jo, etibdIrklonirArtitiOn vonslitt of 4$ !Ws) TEL 0 .• ‘.,5C17r/ 4 ' fq017,fri.! We find no litsdfIrrtontt illciattv DAVID S. PNMAN orMERYLINMAN, * b!$M J JOHN$QN 111,10 Omc (FA/D$) 160-Itii69. DJJ:ntej co: %Vowed), Construction Coinpany Attn: Kennett' L Waymire Oc; bovki Cheryl !notion THANK Yoti POR CHOOSIAI We took tiorwattrI to S1Iigji 111 eft Oryooe itttle .6r)(1 Ottiotti TEL NO.1 503 ' 694 2599 A CONVENIENCE , &h1 LOCATING PROPSATY' ANY VARIATIONS AS HAY et 0I CLOSED 1i iM1� MAP IS FURNISh. ASSUMES NO LIAWL1T'� Dec,01,94 NE CaMPAfIY I � Rr5t Ainericaii rid Co p y 4Ureg AYBEINr+Ri WIN OS* nere OF 3T1R 9►,;:^aNCR O PANV F 4�G Qs 1700 S.W. FOURTH AVENit I k. PC'RILAND, OR 0201-5512 ipTAVEV.,Y ISTAiE S .0`NO 0/$1 in. - $ (±11, `Ir 't 2' we 043. 52.00 50,00' ItAtlr t .1010 eAF makt91111 1 1 1 1 . . O 1.'d OP", Ti dd�'°. Q1`• Woo' 0 %.0.stdV %o' LOS' 13 d LOT 14 LOT 15 IN 5,044 SF .B50 SF e4 5,044 SF rn pe* © OW Aoty: Wit WAY ONE 252.96'. 8918'W FWD sir oa wr1H A, UU.r m PLAS110 CAP NAR(EI$ 0a4AS£,, ONts A ' 0C. 3 -1$` Wit ScAPE itl7,6Afr1T 11) or? OF 116ANr, •IrUk4,IAmt.. iwtr►' PI CAlmito%twr TA) Gaff or YstAlt0 �; .. , LOT 15 LOT 25 ed c1 o ` + `�.r. 1 ;�?' * 7 ' 153 SF .04,752 SFii)," bo k.o.:T 0 ng a 14,502 '"'' ' °° Cw4 b � q i,.l31.4 d 60y13 1 kr • in S Oi0'58' 4i`' V )T 27 115.90` 30,05. s Wel°1f LOT21 1 8 9,7611 SF o rw 70,27 47 ,a S 66•39'14" ►�i S 50.0" 5 0 . . 5.61. OAR LOT 20 in 0,913 SF 5.10' 54:1'1' TRAeT 125,253.:SF ' SEWER 1040 5T ►4I1 ®RAIN o,c MAINTENANCE AND A+CGES$ GASg MttE 1f® CIrr OF 110A00 s li9`36'4tei W io8J)6 obewifro 1 - 'SAtil AND trotIM ORAINAGt IAtM NAN E *No r0 SS L,AS I NT 'tQ C117 OF 1!JCAR® F,4 • WAVERLY CO • CLISMS ADIAASSi TEL NO.1 503 694 1599 404140 Dec 01,94 23.51 P.12 1010 SW Takena Amway; On f76$I4o4B (601036 ~782, Plt i8em of Landscape contracting General. &ch , Seed, Tree and trritit tt wen'erty Cortetrrebore Ca. i ®66 V ' C hty View Lane Watv la, OR 91010 (G03)t. 6 Fi WilivorkY Estet i L g ot 10,13.% R1W WM rtiecepe Eesereot along eastern ot y lbw Wide a td app?ox, Kit;' !Ong. * ALU aderldron, S4 004, eget Qa0016 o6CN, thin, Z° ettU aoac rm VictieRipin 4r7 Off' vvoRK0 Front t otb Tow of trees epiced approwtwistoly 90' L% 'itwett pl *crate a nd �+ bece+�een rou►a. The Q. dt ty u * spot etrproxaa�ao�tsiy 6�` to tyre wait, The eeeond row ()Met t �uritlltsi to t ie Atet ro et row. "rlw"'dlidbsi+/�.n16 "'el�ae9e:5+..1_ • ,. .. ... 1 �essmr ;16�Iws.ar _ e,.... COMP'l :' ri I Y EN 10. NcittO1.+ iAt °r 1 Cott of poitoe tiggo,00 PRIM AZ410 EisTIMATE,V COMIIETION DAIS 111130$4 Pootio to 4tie within S® de d eat 6010600,6 ur 1,8140 . ._. �� ®.. _. l,1rwd¢clt ro Wail* a � ded to eiit ounte 6v4,rer lV -.... Kett LI ck )nbill Kph Lute bgore witrgem 6 eet�ie �nnd 'U� rietit 4ltceed the wle®r sictio,1 wiaiieq diid irte , P 46'0 Wailitts i 'Odai ii ;r. veld of Ltoketibtli oeiti aotlti OOr tr &etttai +ei �, �'e1 6 Otpoeh Mitt DgIte th4t 014.4te 001'01600 Willi be state e �4ere0eQoe��a 8cevolok l t etutllog v 6'66 it/014114d; litt> 6101601 Ole kbilitetik.0 ditinV,,th Oiekiiktt IA 'Mt 6044 NU **ma citto Llano 9 r do) titAi.14040.400 tokotio E1c10 64 `' • • • • A mer c r' t1e Insurance .Compt An assumsd business nanO ,bf TITLE IN§;URANCE COMPANY OF ofifEGON 1 700 S.W. FOURTH AVE., PORTLAND, OR 97201 -5512 ,(503) 222 -3651 CITY OF T7CGARD—BLDG DEPT December 1, 1994 ATTN: GE1 Y OAYNO 13125 SW HALL TIG , OREGON 97223 CONSUMER iW F 4)RMATI ON REPORT Mr We appreciate this opportunity I t3a of s+er'dce to you. Tease remember Fleet Amelrloan Title Insiireoce Company of Oregon (c r ynner EscroW end flue Insurance needs. g counties ._ , a os, Crook, Curry, Deschutes, Douglas, Agents and offices in the t�ollowin cot�ntees in Benton, Clackamas, Gp Cilliarri, Hood Ida der, Jackson, Jefferson, Josephine, Klamath, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, fdiaiheur, Marion, Multriorinah, Polk, Sherman, Tillamook, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wast o, Washington, Wheeler and Yamhill, This title information hue nlahed, without char" ,e, In confornriance with the guidelines apprroved by the Aide et C /min' surani e Cornnmissioner�Thee lnsuran " .e ig to b► a .,. , . V c ®Divislol-� cautions i grnlediarles th +at thifU sler�i � nad � �9 the n Ann ®td i y benefittin ' interrnedia�iios Will not be permitted. Safe ac is same be die,, ;+ntiinued ' to Witty ie R nt insureds, �adiitcrilrlinat�a lies only g pe ' y iisiumed for any errora In this report, SPATE OF OREOOfV 83 Cetffit' 9f Y�66e,:ln9/4°na r w., ♦� 61 M5e ; meht antf tt ►4 �iF 1,. h %/eliy� Chet Gterk f��inlYa�t"'�i�ce�Ve� thevilt iNTI: i4i elir" , pit3e;of° bed and.reot�rttad � ,�.� w :�;� coUrl';.i '1n *411 lt,\''V ° ° �"" 41 ' y4 , y.1I'I gM�+ •; T} Y i t ^�eP�, D roc4ot .b0 Oe ;tmtll CIer Doc :. 9.073925 � 127/85 08/'C19/'109'� 03:2 :21'PM ?5000 0 A TIQN 0 4409,61 14111ia,064birio,1 A Q.,REiiii i0iON r011; I,VAVIRLYrtSIIT ITrra�Ei4 �w5 rR-- E00,AiDt ,Ypyy�y�p��igybbN111101011 %: 1 A11AFASHIN`7 TONt CO LINTY,,OKIB ON;,„ 9' tir ;�N fir•" r 1 � %' t ri' Pate DEC!ATICN A 3TICI. E 4 DE131611TICNS 1CI 3 2 ART[C LE IV Q 2 ' ARTICLE!! C ENICPAzI A VIt . ACKN OW fitDCIEhFNT � ,p,�te recb d t f,�turn fo r Wlauort} ,Cat struotion o► I�� 3ia35 :�t�er. tryRiew Lena W1ilsohvill��k�R 97070 ' -1 Ti „ th s 10t>`r iy of July, 1994, by WPV3RLY TE�Y3 D��LARl�ptOl'� n��de,, a r� , YCTIQN .00.11W.: nOte on;CC� are ian; ,,CCiN3TP.. '� �� n ►; . . f DEC�►l�Ai�T . { .real pro a in the City of Tigard, MEREl1 i lE ER REi��RW I T I th uindr'olroeifain, pr arty , Vl`NI'REA9'�ECI3/OR�11�T is Nash► ` to tat t.if gor,� a p U desarib as Iollows, County ot,d r►i� �e}ot mots' a ,., WAA,V'ERLY;.E3TATE , a= paraded subdi sion' in the "Nort e&3t.Quarter of 3ectiora ftq Township 2 South, Ran a "i Wast`at the Jil rrtot e I a�ldiart~' 4, , s" p - tiatibleaf to cataln protective. larartt "stud► v�nuay�,s�id �,ropbe , ts, co Wi ERE 3 e ns, resorvMtlons,, a se,., ., c . benefit royenonts, aoladidoras, gestncti w " � ` ent�ents 11r�r+s:and,cl ar$es,tor thn at said real ro e ° and its present and subsequentiooune s ax . areinattM Set. forth, p P � �� ', eS. thetelloxyt�� ',s�dprop,rt3!�sh�ltbe NOVii,! rHEREF *PRE,�Dleclarantherebydeclar , ua 'n5, event tote d an . ns .,'rottC " the uoi'" �`' ' rt ditio , t►ve�ed;sasb�ect $c�a�dxolldvu� desrbz�ients, res��bns;�cov ®nb►nis eta held, gold for the the pu; .. etakef enhancing 'ertd A . . atrw which bone, , r ', perty Tnesekeasanaent ; co enaa,ts iestr3ct!ons ene coradiitions atcrartiveitess ati'saidreaspYb .! shall constittate covenants to run with the,{la nd bind s'hali,!a Aind1rig an ill persons claiming tinder them and having right, dtle'and/or interestin the desc ibed property or any, pert thereof; and shill ini re to the .benefit of and be c d s s i a a ph, � tier er o a and ni /heirs and assigns it an Indiviaitai or its successor lg Waverly Estates Declaration -Page tiietwinwordlcovenant do c! AWr1OL ► a+ ;lr'o.11lZ'IJN ,� , � + �, �.� � ` rir�a�dre4�es�.ettual Li 0Lo!,,,,,,,,, � h tda+ `ejyd riar t ;e ,ot, th pl itced, »o� thiCii 1b'd1v fOfl'ti� ;vu, ti %' w `p � �r�d" �sd�9' pert t ie re 6r�. gr ►heth®r'�dnee 01 mcre per3 y ar' o Ataie" a t " 0 "taatiyL,A ' pa et iii :41S:.;n11pd` , Yb f ry �k I 'O', I F11J4 Lf k N R sur��ntere5tmerely aS y '` 11100011;q01: I s ' oe�' d+reteela trill) t ' '''iabOu d tts lucCOsiOrs�d ., . w $t h n� ecai 'J de o ont Snterest from the ,so soecessors`at� arils , �. r �RtL}.��y�.� `rh�»t,�gpT.S r 4 tt i �,., ', } ��,+ , i, t , L,e arauts iPU l';':,4,;'''' w 4 1 1 (, rU ' a i. F ,i r 1.4 " sha0 lean that.�strv.CtU1 star ai!ntended to ba+��c led 'as a "Residence4> � , w, � ybe, and ,the d's ellln,ogetaair "vu ha tt hse of ac1aer'ed' a es, ss t%e ca�ae tip wa das,Poicties �� ae � a, a 1.5 Dcclaratiorw � re b i tfia �tOL/ ,COVENANTS, CQND ICNB $I .i , p ;d14 FO , A R `� :b1SV4 ss asexeee &bli.ffieDederats;on ti 1DttedaY�ofiu � w ' a , 1.6 "Tract'D" ehwlmieer►a d.refesto thitiOea shown �d ;o,desgnatb.i onthe, stet -- dt lou'p!otb l�is'afotestr esfadonatdw nds protection area` owned on en nndivir ,4ed basis by ah lots tact iin the'subldtvisiun. ARTICLE 11 RF' #ICTIONS The 011a■AiintrestniXona shal1,a0p1y Z) all Lots.OrrRestdent1 l Lo s cated; 2.1 ' , Plat itastrictions int046veruints. The,�b 1:e: I R . Waverly !suites are subier.°tto the easemont nxdrestlrf at', oast owfl on'the AaeOrde► plat ailitheit irrvirant, rconditionsandrestriodorsa +6recOraedintlir`Daid'Re©ards of Washington County, Oregott, ;'� a ire. 1(I OYI . iesidek��al l� ®?i Wilms G QpOrct►a aid Gaz es► (a) The snta fbo rates Of any sh 11 be riat '' lass than i sir esfeet tCav�ltges shall ba of a: ize,for, id ,ibPat a: ,utri1e"s, ,,, it ito 'thelov drorg roundtVioiSlw:�rlo. tb1 lnthe e�of � 1411 story diPiet i31 , f ��,( 1! p" " 1 v+ or m lewel'dwel ,g' t, :., 'C iiiiio ili s not less t ►n ` I6°° sage feet M , @'xterin Materials and Moist !xtector Tnf,ter$as and colons must be approved for u►c by the Dec PA pat s be !recto. ,. or perrrQttod :o rat on a lb tyarposoa 2.3 (a) . ��uctuses P@►�lited. ��a improv�rnedt.�, a .1 v .. � � . "° � teonce, ct normally Reg�dezl�u+1 Lot axceptirnpt'� e��i� gone ter sa of �e Nata,�su� k r�e�e�ri adcestb 2.4 er Res Use i es1dennt!fJl Lots'3 1 be use dot ; �residential p. a fro an 1 h O o s1 s be ss ab U C e.„dc, ot In vaiia�0it t+: applicable Risk of Y rveablo ourslde 1 Gas r . � eq ment'Vehic1e5 Mitr4.r or� supplies used Tiga�i Dtdinances nog shall as►e `g �� sines�s ba dept cnr stored on any �estdenl�al !torn Lo a pr f . _ allies relating ;to the :i e�eimed to �lrvh�t?�t' �At` �t� a�iothira� �'!c �E'l1S par,xalaYc S%�dl �e � or oontraatax or �1�YnB buildbr to constry retltal or saga �rf Dots, (0130)4h; th phi � the}p�sr� ant '., .. ... d egnlpnierit on such a resident �, dwell ng ResIdentto,l Lo to stare construction maxerlats an • jJq' " r ti r iif° 1 k5 Ill�S�r?� "Y Slk 'orotsirt toe rarec®tirseao! construuco ad,t tasoany resideftiei;t, eililt as a sties offico ,rrtodel lame :or i pi .oht tr Qwrier„ o�tlai•Resld fltie1 LotrtQ t tdl iia n a � rol3e�! lot rpeerrtet«lc►,in'rfhib b ' au brdkoj e Pfot onsnbd ii(ecl ) b thi3d inrigeshs t of the or prop; '�)oria�l ,rrsor�ei rccards or, o �iuti s;rh�f�d a peT onel b±u4si�na s orpro1e�'siof +<olept?ena,ca dr:conf er v th business or rolossiona�l assoc tbs,�.r customers+ in aras ,or:hei~ resid�+rt gal dwelling. 'such hemp ifficr;o home u'nl'ess cdvitiea; :sh *11_hbiVe eeil'b"e;snblcct to end�compt*t City of Tigard CommUnit�i�,�DO'Velopment rogialations 2,5 ®esir atldf3etoi l�astricdor+ Any prlstde nce that is leased or ranted may only be so leased or regnied „on tbrmslioqu ttiat,,theAter t be bound b 1 he.tArrns of this 1DecLeraUon Every lease�on every residence is „s�tlble to the tollou roues and reguladoris, regar�de"is,of whethen in the leasetrent 1.green efts;e) tht+dse of the premise$ is subject to the Mi to :arid rag latiens:of this',copnrn ty: (b) •tie rental unit cahnot'be used as�a hotel or motel or otherwise for traiaslenf tena�nts.r; . e",.�� Offensive;aUNai ful1ActivtHos.' 10 n� iaus.or offensive act vittes.'shall teko place on h ,..,d a..w. In N • With or any part ox the subdivision nor still ariyt�ittg b ® ".dono o � platted in same that interferes u. " f y to residentar o uhlawful jeepardizes,the„eaijo'y�tent'o! arty letswhich is a �ource�pf enrio anc6r ., , use shall . be rriude, of a`Lot ► r any part .ti ere'of, nd hit valid lei tsi dinettes,' and regulation of altgover ental bodies 'kha jurisdiction thereofnshaltbe obsfyiryed. . er then two (€ j hottsehbld pats; no anitrtals, livestock, fowl,` or poultry jr,of ariy,klnd $lti� be raised, bred keptntar�perrrtittrsd Within any residential tAriit. Ptis dad �d shall s not o be a n • Maintain d to�ream the shah bb reasonably. t3onq'911��d so � � � iatsnne�o, pets�shali noe be'pearriicte . tnactta�es end �rourtdsa g �h p �r co�araty drdina�tice. 2.H Maintenaaice ot,tI nprelled subdivisions unatten be co bier sYaa11 makitafit Owners Lot and improvement;<,thereon Ina Olean and attt"ractive ',condition, In good,repr and in'such fashion as not to create a fire lard. Such' inalntentice Shall iriolude, painting, repaWitalreplacemeft and care art for In d, eXterior building surfaces, walks and other exterior irnprovernetits and glass ddition, each Owner shalt keep ali'shaubs,_trees; grass and plants onOdr►ner's Lot p... °� 1� . .� � tn, q Vii. +alt' � fuses slia�be,tYieres al. Dt+.zr�,b$o causedbl neatly trimmed, property cultivated �, � free of dash �d other tans ,�►uy maC' fire, flood. sto earth uake, ot, var sin o� cheat pdnsibt�ity Of each Owner and shall ba repaired within a reasonable period of time 2.9 Oil and Mining Operation No oil or gls drilling or mining operations, of any kind, shalt be permitted upon or in any Lot tiding boats, trailers maporcy� m Pelting: . Parkirg.ot any vehicle • or otluipment, incf +. ► t be allowed an any . ,1'ruc,�s�cannpeXS :r otherory ,basis shall net be at1,�7wed xbcroationai vehicles s no + is ^� l l on any part of part of the s4abdivisiorw arse t on a very �ars�t , o WaUer�y Estates eitcept only within the confines of an en wlosad gatap a yr screened as. ea'' and no portion of which shall project beyond the finer shall permit any'vehi +,te that is 2.11 • Vehiclels In disrepair. + T in an extreme state of dine epair to be abandoned or te. µamain parked at where in the stn division for a period in excess of zl hours, , .. ,.'� , .. p _.' Of _ _ exce t signs Which Signs. NO signs steal. b � erected ar f ►Maintained on any Lot cupistit s n. the ass or.ra P .. property for sale Or rent, Of terriporary signs not larger than 30 irache' by 8p inches a dve�5ing the mx ®8 ir►aha�a b5. ?4 iraehas (or 1 ®ass dig 1� �urr� a ti ration. . e ,P the sale or rental. tempts iz .ary seasonal car community ciec�. Stich signs must a remove upon Of the Resitllenteal Got and/br the vruuellir ° , tltorebn, or the conclusion of try onnrrttaniy project (as applicable). the resections itt this paragraph shall not to (a) the ton? orery placerrtent of political signs by the boner rr (h) the pL. cement by the Declarants or Deelnraiits agents of one or reline tight identifying then erne of the Decltsrcnts end the location of a sales offic andiOr model Waverly Estates beclaMoA- -Page }tri**174.4*1 14191,410; .N3 , Fop 74k •. • r y, 1, A,r9 ,t�t' «� �;:1 `; �xYa 7J 2'1 i- * +r di'�d 1 1 ��} ubbihia and Trish.' NoaL " °etro p� of the d�IC 1 rr ct �'�pce�cecvd 011 + ear , k • A3161,,,', Jy f` N 5 Y �. � + E ? ZKI ti ` 4�a �1 k. Y e`utgin-3'141d ual''laigeggol fiats of yyLndj..1Atip .., tit" ,? 9,�jtt 5 IJi%b i"' T g, ,hd ' t OTrsfd re a dI!r1001,04' Il.�,,oft''ptt. c, w tard . phi t: ,+ preptisite`sa tt '''''' t �- �' �P,, ryp , -w } oi') * I ' "od GClto �b�Oil*, . pi,ioE s'h +n r °a ��d��ais�itiitols�yW � ,, �tcd�rd�� i,1,Y�.yj��.y*�.yr.�. �j�,n'r�x. ,�+y�{4Y� G• 1y�_._� `nw y�y �y .a4 @ i , c a , ii,, MI m + coved t otI $ 1� X 610.,h t n.mt Ydro!dAr P Of4 ✓... �'}} �N��Sit� d�li�t1 ari`�n�'i��ot�iS>l�i ,: '` +,Myy�� n:� P n r. .K,� n n e��a,v , � n �. a d, } rto "pave /lt a ei1 •��111 aesd' �eedst' .p( R' Gass thereons''' olcuf',ar no ak }�SrdiOt�A�W�� 4as�' fs'a' . X' and ld�b�sldvll Yl It '` /"4f t 35 ��QjQ1�{ �( .14414,11.1,,,;:i: 1 Mi rh +wt t kyKi + +. 1M �Y n a .i^ �eaition�oi', n' 1san e, it"rit a her1 o i v r +c ymM�k• iy��/►y p ;��j� /�y�,p� • rtxr4 dpk /qa2 •1 / t M e ✓a{� ■p ^ t��tlititi M r t d eIf th D0blo1P@.lil�`i {ieL 0{ MtheI JISotoi ti y 3, -14 11 f 11 b$Y� •� '+ �H fil6tto„ oY e s., H:1oi L,;��,�y r �,. +i' .n("!fi' 7 a f #t 1+ Lot tolb%r �dOts ie conf�triction n�s1i lb Lcts n st comme"'ce ? o i ►h ' o on.'; 61noh is from {he b6aint " 6t attlie�tefldrilnnp�tiJOe�et�ts ;tn�isthe�.co �iete�,d.�it �, r �� a„ ° � , � ,w, � h ,Fi , , �� zl be � xt.nded 4di' a Ir►lhifa;�t ►tai,+ i iOinili rdsti irhad;ai ee� omdit16niri, fiAitgfb1. l!� , r [ u reasbnabi'axlerigtki'of wria.upbr� written a pr69.art or t t�,a;Declatart,'o its aszine: , t,Thebula�l "are& shalt be iteptreasohab'��,icleen ar in Wor m,r&ke order ,dur•ni� the cons�ucdon eribd,(il } ra ?i trl na� � pa '► Jiu J� + + n d r � t 1 ylt .� ' 4 ' C� a ,3: �r ±� r z r, r- r• r2i5 ; "L ndscapeleotir, LidonlAn the ,�c&se „oi 1Lats sold to, utldersl allrland5ceping iYl a. �f' 4,twi,.1 i ' f a. 1 rust be`cotnpleted in ti a front yard reas �;Jitllin+ use (9)`' onths� nm the date` of purchase. . .htrl sib f 6) ennui ,;'alter 'The �emais~.�landscaipin�euf lairds` s11o��be complat`ed5vui ^� r t— b ge:, t'!;'9 i a r r rtt 1� bu tl 1 cilmpletl "on. f ` 216 Tem ec Btru ire i�o senacttlYv.of a d q � t, , �� terripOra�►,c aYatt�ero traiiei', bese•; r JCshai be used onery.Lotat�any,tlmr a as :ti, residencn either 'nt;�teta't�gera�gakar ottie ®ut�tail� • temporarily or permanently..,. , ru 2,17, , ;Serc�ice.Ykard0 ..arvtce ja�rds.( woodlst0r,asel °cotnpos`ting.1adittles, garbage r starage;�etc.) shell be,coi ip'leteiy screened se that the'e'lerdents,sceoned are;not i ib1e t on the street br adjolydngylit,0 er,t 1 { " r f ,1 , ' G r ” ,x Y 2'18 " Aratecutaaa%'ddeatehite Disks, 1 a Extador'arte nas, sh 1l4not be permitted to 4 b x, r W ro rt�a i v Ir'r W "Os • s a17 rc 3 1 ' ^._., i ` alite' reco11et�and {rdissfon ^disirs are pfohili ted, be nl�cediapon and L'b��al� ".2,19 1,' Setbaclto,'M rsiuir leight,irid� iriithum;Yard, irbq ements. Y,Eech` Lot shall d nn lnv rnclleight, ands mr inimumi5ldc front and teer,yacd requirements t;e sub�ece to the `setbaelt, +, „ M * � n r �;�rd� "a>,��i+ncA'�d to anp land eittabtJshed by there "corded plot restrl ions`a ndpity of a� , i , _ use review procedure" estabboried+by`said,01W,of gor,tit�f, ;'' ; a ' 2,10 Grant ,nf Waivers1or Conise �ts.'� except eiis speo ti iyprobidad herein, extend'e icep°aons waivers 44,consents�to; its i�eclatagon ad,�ardty, em grant.ok„ , Y,,.. J + N±r iY n "'do�dlop �y ,�� r , .,, r "J ars during suon shall be,excltisi0eiy in th Oe'elerat ►t o- its strcdess ite asM, *� , sue.! a . q �Q , � a rE�l,ateru period'as; the •.Decl rant or its�suacessorss oWittal prop iiii ihr aretly�l 2! ' Trees ay SectiOn i8 0 Ohf tie TigardtCo ti i r. Devalaipt ht Cade on any lots Wit,inl a � tree removal i5 prohibited unless a tree ys;dIseaiod`Ind thete is danger lot Within � ., . tr1e tree -nay rent on existing orpropose2 strucnrres'et interfere biitn,uattty soititdes. nucn removal shall comply r,with secdon 18,160 above, 2.22 Weveloprnerlt;aclearing, grading,' +tilling .or tree removal In�the'T'ract D open spa�e� wetland buffer area is ptol ibited unless tapproved by the ,City of .Tigard Otlaet than utilities and water eiiclity ineasitres only non.}abed pede trlarl 1. 0l!'tva s are pern4+ttad in Viet L?a it is anticlpeted1,thatw got Owners of Waverly Estates will,Nrotec�t the preservebon areas of Tract D from ganoral public encroochutent to protect the habitet'values and to min- size site disttirbOtet,s wilding onstruction o control 2.23 The building �: n any lot shahs onpt�e wlttl the Oity of�'I'(gnrd. one drain ge swine meas�res,shown on the approved pl , 2,21 'e lar a cape easement shown on the recardod plat to the City o1.Tigard act�rus$ Lots, 17 t:.1,,, t'''gh 20 shall be,maintained as a bluffer' between the subdivision residerioe:� end the ekIstir'� daiz°yr tarn to :the ` east. At such time as tile dairy farm ceases operations; it shall be of ho tutthur fora and effect Wauesly flsti►tes Declaranorx '-page I , , , „ ...,/, . e 1:4',',INVeYtte0.7r1..e , DECLARATION oploQvsNliorrp , COVINDIP111011freq1DREPTRICTIONSi WAVERLY, cottAittattion doe' , EISTATESACKNOWLEbGEMENII: 11■MTE 012QQN.A.., I county 4,,,,i,!lifii;foro9a— JuAirm,,,or!„ „,.. ,th,llii4;tolthoted,,dot.',Kag°0n:hoit lAlLeii‘liiiiiitre:difit''4P:?t:tetainin't'i7e,. Irl,; Y_ ., Ctitasuelrgithti:t°etib'OlhntY''''vtitiliflOctii' a ill'. BOard'uf Dirtotort:tatid ttt11 6101uhttiri) act and !Inn of id CO Nlg.......a..:r......s... . , . . o o rpoTAR UTM410 EfRe107........a.L. OFVICIAL SEP ivip coinntision otpitis: ' -21 -**1 Al- iVOTA RV PU111,10 .00:(1ON .,4 , , MAnY ct4APMAtts ''''-lt . 00MNOtiloN rla(1itit)5 ,.11s, 000.41831CM r.,:tt.,11:11:5 JUNE :!J, ION Weitiits0 Fithiter; Deolittitioil—Page 5 dm,ti.;.,,,:,.....-.;:,,,is.,,k,,,:v.t...r.i.v....,r;s:::-4.,..,..1: s.0 t7, w RECEIVED PI. I 1 Response to Staff Report City of Tigard, Oregon March 30, 1 gr3 Friends of Cook Park . Wetlands Impact Statement. hr� ► w are given time to find an alternative Request that d We �8 e � vGn 1S source ' statement. Buffer of trees and fence between property and Wetlands. In addition to the 25 foot buffer that is standard requirement, we are request ng a fence be constructed to protect the wetlands, *Refer to Corp of Engineers Report. • Follow Surface ace Wa1:er Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities. This are u where lots 20 and 21 Proposed otherwise have This. should be loc;ate vet otherwise soap snarls, oil and needles draining into wetlands. 'propose no fee in leu of water quality facility. • Clarify what Is meant by a temporary turn around at the end of the "temporary" dead end street. The fire access road is unclear- and needs to be reviewed by the Tualitin Valley Fire District for approval. • Review of proposed grading plans in areas with greater than a 25 percent slope. from the soil l have rec Iles �.ed a deg elopment inventory conservation service and am waiting for their report. that in our l am requesting ha this report be included it is issued. + *This nwillhprovide expert advice and coi ent on the • have fn the soil. impact the development will I *. �a ill address the issue of erosion which *Specifically t w is in line with Tigard s Comprehensive Plan page /1_13 item 2. 6. Ensure permits from the Division of State Lands and Corps of Engineers are obtained. This is a standard requirement and we want these permits be obtained per our request. s . Tree removal permit obtained that includes a tree survey identifying trees ova d1 6 inches in diameter and justification for removal. . tree ee r emo'la l b e adt�' keqUe4►t�.ng that minimal , incorporated into this subdivision and that ta.6n i tree be planted ark and the es to p�rdvide a buffer between the Park development. Also, around the tr° identity Y last pd.a� eanents araau i it on record that n• ,i to retain snore trees. This ;,'is in line, With Aty of Tigard;` Policy 3.4.2 that development 'proposals do iot ; substantialrY. alter the character of the trees or major vegetation, ,a . San tart':, sewer designed to avoid wetland Sensitive land cro sings. This' is a recamnriehdation from the Unified ,Sewerage Agency that has reviewed this dev'e.i pme.rxt 4nd we are in agreement With th'ent. er A Buffer/ fence between developtent and Thomas Dairy. fi=rie.nds of Cook Park Value the positive influence the Thomas D airy has on tie park 'and request �est a fence be"' Placed as a matter of safety. *Talked with Frank Hodapp, who Works for the �sch school district and he indicated that a Eft. 4,,ycione fence _,..i11 be built between the proposed development and the High School. *The purpose of the fence is to protect the pr:4perty owners and the school from potential problems. We propose that a fence be constructed fc. r the same reasons. ;� easCi�l ALSO WA1N��1`C9�i��'Y �'ECDPLET��1 �E� DEVELOPMENT SIGN WAIVERS op WASH i N%T t WAIVERS (NON-REMONSTRANCE) THAT GIVE UP THEIR RIGHT TO COMPLAIN TO THE CITY OF T I CARD ABOUT THE FARM. (TALKED TO BOB CONE FROM THE LAND USE DIV.) ALSO, THE DEVELOPER IS REQU I REID TO PUT A NOTICE UP ON THE PROPERTY THAT THERE ARE SMELL, NOISE AND PLY L IM t TAT I DNS WE REQUEST THAT THIS BE NOTED ALSO. 10. Stream allowed to flow naturally into wetlands. A class I I perinea' streams flogs through this property''; need clarification of the staff report. This stream - n larcvidesi natural fi.ltrata,,h for the We #lands . and the road should be adjusted ancordicnglr to allow natural flow. We recommend that the stream not be piped. Additional recommendations April 5 1►93 le • Th road th Asters the pradec► veea bunwted athat lots and 2 be re loved end the ro av+irl► he sti,ea n . Islands of trr!cLi be forined between lots 15 - amad 24 on Ken Drive Also leave island of trees on the side streets such as Lloyd couir't and Tyrone Court: Please refer to C..� e, nesxs Loop in Tigard that has existing isJan s tre e;^ ccording to the 'plans : t xe Priends 0f'' t ook Park ha''te viewed, the water line and the sewer line °, wou;ld go Y a tl:ands.' Even though axe a usin;g throught to wt�ae w ,. ewer'' line exists in ; the wetl7ands y we recoili'�ne ►d that. an ,> , alternative route be eXplored;. to avoz'd:'`*he wetlands comp1 ,te.t,y. These Wetlands have alreatly been ,enh nC6d and dig 'around in this reaa,r aga:i'n w:iuld cause .snore disiurbai ;te' to the plants and wildlife. { h'e report from the schooi s districts, indicated 'that, t1 the schoolsin the area are already at fiat. r kcapactY. ,Most of have children at burham school' wh�ieh 'would servC ' this development, are well aware c ' r ke vercrnwda rg,' that, has occiired. We would recommend that " the size of , thy' °` development be reduced by at . ,east 18 ,fats to account for this. The lots removed would 'include: 1','2, 3, 17'18 19 19, 20 $ 2'f 2,229 30,'31 , 3 0 37 9 38, 3 9 1.7.(,1". Removal of these Lacs: would also accomplish the f o l i o cing Provide good buffer betwq en park and .de'VelopMe at T Provide buffer between farm and developrdent. C. Avoid removal of established trees. D . Avoid extreme disturbance of stream. • • c'• H s «; N tt west iv r'o ziete0, Ins:. Wetland Del ni atior ;,4 W11. fe Fvaluatio WETLAND DELINEATION AND MITIGATION ATION PORT WAVERLY ESTATES Tigard, Oregon Prepared For WAVERLY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Tigard, Oregon Preptured by NORTHWEST ENVIROSCIENCE, INC, 1201 S W: 12th Ave nue r Portland, Oregon (501) 'A;tittie 1.0 INTROINXTION METHODS AND livIATERIALS . 2,1 Soufce Material 2.2 The Federal Manual 2.3 Fielu Methodology 1,0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3 ,1 Topography 3.2 ' Hydro®gr 3.3 Soils 3.4 Vegetatio ► 3,5 Conclusio 4.0 SITE MITIGATION 5,,O REFERENCES 6.0 AI'PENDIX 6.1 Wetland Data Sheets rn WETLAND DELINEATION and MITIGATION a EPO T WAVERLY ESTATES Tiga'd, Oregon .0 DITROD CT 'O T Northwest Enviroacience, Inc. performed a wetlarr i del'aneation and preliminary mitigatiou. concept plan on a trite located east of Southwest 92nd Avenue in the City of Tigard presented Construction C .rpany. The general location of the site within the Ti and for Waverly �.oiisaa City is ,.��iesented in Figure I e According to the legal description, this site is situated in Town rip 2 South, Range I West, in the Ncrtheast U4 o f Sectiodt 14. The proposed project 'will involve the developnment a a residential area south of Tigard High School uu id along the nrrthe n boundary of the ;site. The upland area of the site Corieists of a k ir- Revile, A community while the wetland porticn of this rite represent; an area le ►a than one acre which is populated With willow, red aides and river sedge. development of this site will require the filling of 0.15 acres to a comodate :In access road into the reaidentiai community. 2.0 METROr$S ID MATERIALS A site walk over was performed to assess the 'hydrology and vegetation, The interagency Federal Manual for Iderdi ing and Delm agtf w Jurisdictional Wetlands (federal Interagency • Committee for y Delineation, y + : a 1 )87 and 198!x) was used as � Wetland g document, g� the guiding �ec%iiCal dd?Gi�ilie:'e`, Th;, guidelines in this document direct the methodology to correlate the three major criteria defining a °etlands Thee. three criteria regard vegetation, soilS and hydrology. Spccitically, it has been determined that to identif? an area as wetland, he following parameters must be established: ed predominantly A. That under normal � ?ircunistan�°e5 the substrate is ireclori��aantl =drained iiydric which are soils that ere saturated or ini ndeted long enough during the groom, ►if,ig season to develop anaerobic conditions, B That under normal circumstances there is inundation or saturation for one week or more during the grewing season, the glowing ,seaaon for each region of the cou;ntfy has beer. establi.zhod according to !r4ail temped :;iture regime s. The watet table muat he at a depth of 18 vines or less. C. That under normal circurfistanc .sd 1) store than 50% of the composition of this dominant species from all strata are obligate MLL 'WPM AS wetland, facultative wetland, and/or facultative, wetland species; or that 2) the prevalence index approach normal l (that is, under normal circumstances, a frequency e icy analysis of affil species within the community yields a, prevalence index value of less than 3.0, where OBL = 1.0, FACW = 2:0, Y C = 3.0, PACE" -- 4.0, Quid UPL 5.0), (These five categories of wetlansl plants are based upon, probability of occurrence in wetlands and are assigned ,ned an 'indicator status ").. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey for Washington COUniy, Oregon (SCS, 1982) was consulted for initial soils identification. In addition to this publication, Soil Taxonomy (SCS Agricultural Handbook 436),, the National Soils Handbook (SCS 430 -VI -NTH), and the Soil Survey Manual (USDA Agricultural. Handbook 18), SCE', Soil Series Description Sheets were consulted for the purpose of classifying and naming the correct soil series. For the determination of color, hue and chroma, the Munsel°i' Soil Color Charts, (Revised edition, 1990) were used A sharpshooter spade and a hand powered, 3 -inch diameter soil auger i,vere used to examine the soils on this property. Topographic maps and aerial photographs were consulted fc r, information regarding scale, elevation and topography. To assess ': dr©phytic vegetation, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serve (USFWS) ,rational List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetland: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed, 1988), The Flora f the Pacific Northwest (Th chcock & Cronquist, et: al.., 1968) and Natural Vegetation of Oregon tend Washington (Frankl in & Dyrness, 1985) were , rsulted. The U.S. Geologic Surve y SAS Topographical o r h i calQuadrangles with USFVIS National Wetland Inventory maps overlain were also utilized. Blueline maps of project pan and existing development were also consulted (Northwest Civil Design): The Intermediate ()mite Method was used to collect the field data Four sod test pits (" + .' ) dug f these soli test (ST P's) , ,were... du , and data was collected and nd,record� d. At three ,P r _..lots were sites, sig canx di .erences in plant communities wer detected, tr'he ein, p e d to san �, e vegetation. � ti mated p ercent cover values or p lant species ecies werestablished recorded to determine frequency and dominance � �ibenmire, 1968), All macrophytic plant species in the sampling `f .. . ing uicuts were identified and recorded: p in each (canopy„ midstory and ground cover) were Dominant and y � of three stratum (can , 1 identified and r 1ked ade�� *` ,art species according to the USFWS classification, Sample plot #1 (A1) was located in the southwestern section of the site, sarhple plot #2 (131) was within a g sample p � 3 (Cl) and #4. (C2) was a. within a � am le Hots # ; . 'l r looted wit wooded drainage Swale, s southern uph nd /vvetianu boundat,,. �f �. /e subject site. The upland/wetland boundary was marked and numbered with blue flags: Field notes of data collected are included hi the Appendix. 1 1 1, 1 3.0 RESULTS and DISCUSSION This section, describes the results regarding the wet land delineation. The information is separated into topography, hydrology, soils and vegetation 3.1 Topography The site encompasses portions the Tualatin River flood plein and an. ancient river terrace some 50 feet above the flood plain. The transition area between the flood plain and terrace is described as a moderately steep to steeply sloped transition. On the western third, two small unnamed tributaries have carved steeply sloped northsouth ravines and a broader drainage on the eastern third of the site forms a gently sloping north - south trough. A seep occurs on the eastern flank of this small side depression, At the foot of the escarrmerit, poorly differentiated alluvial fans have coalesced to produce a gently undulatiig flood plain surface. Most of the site is curreeitly forested with a regenerating conifer and alder stand, except for the eastern third and southern portions in the flood plain, where savanna areas and shrub grasslands occur, The site was probably logged and grazed in the past, but ig :1 a relatively undisturbed natural store, except for access road disturbances along the higher northern portion: of the site. 3.2 Hydrology Surface expressions of water occur in the ravines fed by storm water 4. d sewers which feed the small unnamed tributaries running through the site north to south. Additional surface waters were observed as seep type expressions along the base of the slope in ..., several alluvial fan and flood Odin ►aii� locAtiotas �One p perched seep occurs ,47 Burs at about x feet in the south central portion of the site, approximately 17 feet above the flood p � property has modified what probably . ditch on the western side of the laid. Thy, ditch the Gent a vine du ainage by shifting ground water further west. The major resembled t r�1_ �a� hydrologic: ' gradi of the site runs from north to soe th l i ground water occur i `Test pits �, .. near surface gt � in .�° ��, 1�l,and Cl �1 all indicate that ri�,ar � c nnection with the ravine and local sewer pipe outflows. Ponding and saturated soils alt..ng the 131 drainage provide evidence of positive hydrological conditions for r wetlands due to local runoff from the high schools irrigated playing ;yids on the old ... .. pip probably i , . water in predominance, �eds�a� rant e site to the north. While the :ewer pipes , __dra�i;� storm p ceT ery chalky white flows were observed in the stream. flowing Horn the ,Y« „ntral ravine, indicating that some pollutan\i; are also entering the system omn. his hek e1 ivation sources. 1 1 ,....„4„, 33 Soils Three soil types exist on the site, lccording to the Washington County Soil Survey (1982) and are presented in Figu re 2: Quataina loam (37B), Xerochrepts, (46F, undifferentiated steep terrace toils;1 and McBee silty clay loam (30). Q "atatma soils consist of moderately well drained components that are formed in mixed, loamy alluvium on old terraces: They are classified as Fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Hap ludults. , These soils occupy the higher, northern portions of the 'site. Xerochrepts ,p the -, �Y , g kern onions � � e ,oils into the soils occur on the steeper slopes of the terraces and transition to Mc e s Tualatin flood plain. McBee silty clay loans occur along larger streams, forming on alluvium of nearly level surfaces: They are classified as fine, silty, mixed, mesic Typic Haplumbrepts. On this site, they o;cupy broad, nearly flat alluvial fans and flood plains at Mae base of the steeper slopes along the southern boundary. The transitions between soil types are often very subtle, and this makes it difficult to determine which soils are hydlic and which are non- liydric: al general, hydrie soils are saturated fo r long enough into the growing season tee influence the predominance of wetland or hydrophytic vegetation As this period of :saturation varies over time, and even from year to year depending .gin weather pattera°is, the soil characteristics are used to assist in determining the wetness characteristics of the site Structure, texture , porosity and landscap e ... position determine the infiltration ion and drainage on a soil profile. Soil colel s that are dominantly red to brown indicate that the iron in the soil is quell oxidized in the presence of water, or that the router stands in the soil profile Car a short time Long -term wetness in the soil causes reduction of the iron in the soil, and produces black to gray colors: While n`hie of the mapped uri+,s are included in the Wtihington County" Hydrlc Soils a ili ( �) they each may have hydric where suitable hydrology and soils inclusions • development ... 1 1', curs: Sample test ats , s t Bi and Cl all exhibited list t98 , thus hydric soil � p p , i g gleying i wetland soil development: either mottling, gle n or dark chi ©rria, indicative of I we J i occupy r q_ Unclassified wetland soils a� �a� v °' , narrow bands paralleling the tannin, p� to cubs• .� � ro P` / g Unc rig unnamed primary tributaries which are erudIng into the sites upland slopes. Sample pit C2 demonstrates that these rapidly teaitadtinn into complex upland %oils on the steeper slopes. Although not documented here, at the base of the slopes, low relief alluvial fans probably 61apport Cove type hydric inclusions in the McBee series, judging from the prepondeilianc.e of wei land vegetation and wetland hydrology. 34 Vegetation Plant communities i . a the , to the letter and rat tuber i v�hich are present on the site s�onform �o ...r symbol designations of Figure 3, the Site Wetland Delineation Map, There ,.. are three the site. Tualatin River flood plain, riparian zone and upland plant assocriatio�is on A � , A � i� 2 378 • VI a Y N a.• forest assemblages. The river flood plain community is mostly an ecotone! transition, on this site, occurring in alluvial fans or at the toe of the slope. Two primary riparian. ZOMS OCCUr in narrow revines which are cut into the higher river terrace. Tno escarpment between the flood + alp plain and this terrace is the covered by �► successional regrowth forest of Douglas fir and western hemlock, with some clusters of western red cedar, which appears to be replacing an earlier alder sere. The primary riparian zone community (plots Al, B II, and C1) could be considered transitional between the Tualatin River flood plain wetland commueitiee and the upland Fir - hemlock communities (plot C2), The small unnamed tnbutar ie, appears to provide additional habitats for wetland Elements, partly from rainwater sewer outlets, but also from hydrological, disturbance and edaphic variations that appear to increase rairiosite variability. S p ecies such as alder (41nus rubra), river sedge (Carex obnupta), and Western red cedar (" mja, plicaztax), (17AC or wetter) characterize the sampled area, Above the sewage outlet in the eastern tributary, access road disturbance faetore and altered hydrology from adjacent playing field irrigation appear to have resulted is n i early successional - community as sitka willow �. . � l wetland conrununit with wetland elements such (Saila sitc,hensis) and curly dock (Ruume�c craspts). Slough sedge in particular, dominated the hillside seep forested understory in the south central portion of the site (plot C1). Other wetland indicator species and some species more common in uplands occur in these narrow riparian zones. However, the wet indicators decreased in cover across the transition ilia) the adjoining firehemlock community. In contrast, these species, especieoly the heliophilic elements such as hawthorn Cratae as douglasii), and slough grass (Beckmann as syziguchne) anal willow (Salix s ) irte ased in cover and abundance at the base of the slope, where the transition to R) p� Tualtatin River flood plain communities occurs: Some portions of thie area along the southern edge of the site are dominated by Himalayan blackberry (Rubies discolor). Although this a oecies is not a wetland indicator (FACU -), the continuation of hydrologic features into this area strongly suggest that wetland comt'nunit►es at the toe of the slope have been invaded by this exotic colonizing species. 3.5 Conclusion Jurisdictional wetlands gist on this site contiguous with plot areas labeled Al, El, and Cl but no' in the area labeled C2: Based on the review of the sail ve etatio,, and hydrologic eonditions on the project site an area of about 0,15 acres, appears to be wetland under jurisdiction by the U,S. Army Corps of Engineers and the region ~ . +..g g Division of State Lands and will be filled. The remaining 1,16 of wetland will not be directly impacted by the proposed development. The remaining 9:$1 acres of 'upland do not meet the hydrological, soils or vegetation criteria in the legal defi nition nition of a wetland, althoig a� this area co nauns occasional characteristic wetl and species, SITE MITIGATION The evaluation of total acreage impacted within the wetland area was based upon a ground survey of the area. The total area of wetlands impacted from the development g 1' p would include 0.15 acres of emergent and scrub /shrub classification. A depiction of p r presented • Figure d reflect the following this un .,�.;,�t area is resentP d �n �i re 4. The breakdown wool values: il, n9 acres > palustrine scrub-shrub 006 acres > emergent/hydric ground 0s15 total ;acres miti ti*tn biectiyes: The following objectives are intended to represent a framework for the proposed mitigation 1) Create a wetland that will replace the structure and function of the wetland area that will be impaco,d 2) Create a drainage swale and water retention basin to au ?spent the existing area ;IPA provide additional relief from runoff, and 3) Enhance the 'e xisting scrub- shrub wetland through removal of Himalayan blackberry vines in the flood plain. Mitiggieen plan. To offset the wetland loss that is required for the construction of an access roadway into the development, a mitigation plan has been developed and presented in Figures 5 and 6, As indicated, a wetland citation area of 0.2 acres and a enhancement area of 0:2 acres is recommended for development onsite. The wetland creation area would utilize an existing upland adjacent to the identified wetland along the southeast section of the property. This ppind area would be excavated to accommodate the creation of meandering drainage swale, retention tined or wetland depression adjacent to the existing wetland: The topsoil from the upland area (wetland creation area) would be stockpiled during excavation and then redistributed within the wetland area prior to planting: The ( a p willow �� ► /�� sp.) would re resent the dominant tree�shrub species to be planted y addition, other nat ;°,�e wetland species to include within the newly created wetland. In addrtzr�t� tithe Carex obnupta Rumex crispus and hawthorn would be planted: The wetland enhancement area is presently classified as a scrub - shrub wetland based a ponb the presence of hydric soils. This are0, is located 'long the southern boundary of the site and consists of wetland shrub,' that have 'd Jeen..overgrown by Himalayan blackberry. T . , lerr�r: This species will be inechancallYj removed within a 0.2 acre area TLA 'ILL : i re; JUn181031 ROCK DISSIP T OR we- lance unc .ion. The functional values of the created wetland basin would include sediment collection, biofilter%ng of stormwater drainage, flood control and groundwater recharge, harge,:i)oe to the level of adjacent development, the habitat value of this wet; a nd is considered to be of t o crate importance; The removal of 0.15 acres wetland along a drainage channel ` will remove vegetation and wetland soil along the drainageway. The area will be culverted to maintain the existing hydrology. Primary impacts would be associated with the initial loss of impacted wetland vegetation with the trade -off of enhancing a previously innpacted area and the creation of additional wetland to provide increased biofiltering within a floodplain. p_antn e Schedule, The planting schedule for this project will commence after excavation and site preparation has been completed according to the proposed mitigation plan. It is presently anticipated that the shrubs will be planted in October with the initial groundcover seeding to occur in early November. If required, a second mixture of groundcover will be applied during the Spring, )74Tetland SIDnitc ' In order to protect the development objectives and ensure that the mitigation plan develops into a viable wetland, a monitoring tornrg progran is s proposed, Excavation and planting of the area will' be mi taed by a qualified wetland biologist to protect the existing wetland and validate the planting procedures. This latter IA or would be c:._oordnnate d with a landscape architect, who would prepare a landsca p e or planting plan to assist in the final design of the wetland mitigation. During this phase of the wetland construction, a periodic evaluation would be performed k d corrections instituted as required to adhere to the proposed plan. ./" �� b. C. L. ''t. al. 1 955. Vascular Plarnt q are Pacific Northwest, Parts � Hitchcock, University of Washington press, Seattle 4 New York. Hitchcock, C. L. & A. Cronquist, 1971. Flora of the Pacffic Northwest. University Washington Press, Seattle & New "r ork., 72,-9 pp Reed, pa., le. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands; Northwest (Region 9): U S, Fish Wilds, Sergi. Biological Report 88(26.9). 89 pp U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. 1917. Department of the May technical report Y -874. Waterways Tanperintent Stat9ox , Corps of En ineeis. Vicksburg, Mississippi. L i S , Army Corps of Engineers, s, U.S. E avnrortr �' 1 Protection . Agency, U,S. Fish an d Wildlife Serves, and U: S.D.A. Soil Conserve go � Service, 1980. Federal Manual for Identifying avd Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. An interagency cooperative publication. 0.S.D.A.. Soil Conservation Service. 1982, Washington County Soil, Survey. U S,1:A. Soil Conlovation Service-, 1992. Personal t onrnuliicationb 'W slang on County Hydric Soils List. U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service. 1990. National We /lands Inventory Map of Sherwood, Oregon area •ir •.4d „' WETLAND DETERMINATION FORM Field Investigators) :.Enviroscience, inc. Initial :_ c Date: 10 /3.0_,j9(_25., _ W'awer fates, State. _ /regon County: W �h atoton Project Situ: ..,.�...,, �.. Applicant /Owner: Ken Wa mire Plant Community 1 creek tipit:01.4380 Mau) Sample Point: Township: 02S._. Range. 01 Section' .:J4 s w ae'i V etati011alamee°o GienusSpe ses Coda Form Ind:Status % Qenus cies Cade For •. [nd:Status 1) ea° 400= Foe. ' 4.0 7)...:, 2),'I 4i . &id 8). 3)1'�C(gpC k''a 06. 0® _ . 9) 4)6'41 ,�s _ . ' P-4611- 4r_ 10y ..�s .:....�_.._ _ - -. r.•••■ Oa_ !al. a.. �.� /0 11). �- 6) f 4 r Sy. PAct o 12) % dom. tree/shrub/ground spp. OBI: , FACW, &s /or MC: 6Z) / 0 / lir drophytic vegetation? Yes _No 7727'4' ec -. .0 X Comments: ��r-�ti�d�t'._. _�t�t' e :� du � ca�wi a a • .r,J" `=r'- i `'�3 i e eaE �� cam"° t�u� ~•_ t• •rLl`.." �� " 11� `�` — ;, - .... u Series and phase: eY.Y4!4f 1 °ts0h $0 On hydr c soils list? _Yes vgo Mottled? es _No Gleyed? Yes _,,;;, „No Hydric components:! kielgioRL.Leckg,s Depth b- Matrix color /aY 4 l Mottle Color 77 Yk 5 Notes: i;Y 1` 1 Depth _ Matrix color~ � , Mottl.° Color: �.. -..�. Notes :�_.._._..._._... Depth Matrix color Mottle Color _ + Notes: Other indicators: lag►drie soils? !Yes _No Basis: _very low chroma .low chroma with mottles _'gleyed ._,..,high chroma 'resumed aquic moisture regime. Comments Inundated?: _Yes i4o Depth to standing water: //► d Saturated? r es °"14o Depth to saturated soil: "r Other indicators: v..4044, Wetland hydrology: ''Yes _No Basis: inundated /saturated soil _Topography _Evidence of Seasonal Pooling. Other:_.62...e.de Other Do normal environmental conditions exist at this site? elf es No If no, explain below Atypical situation: _,,,_Yes No Explain :, Wetland Determination? 'es _Nor Rationale:_ .5 0444ilapoog,044 4 Commentst EnviroScienceo In d oweraws.orma .r..+ woo* Ira. „Arm. immoromm• WETLAND DETERMINATION FORM Field investigators) Enviroscience�Inc. Initial:_ EP- � Date: 10 / 30 / 1993 Project Site: ave4y estates Stater Oregon County: Washinoton Applicant/Owner: Ken Wa mire Plant Cc mnunity: Eve ritfReb. Sample Point 1 Township : 02S Range: 01 ,, Section: ,„ 1 .1(sw ne) GenusS,pecies Code Form Ind. status % Geanus ecies C ®de P, orm Ine.; ", .St�aius 1 s � ` 80 7) 2 ._ ` . d er go 8) 3)iDsj „dlaw s f5 r- 9 4)d' c ` 6itc 10) 5)0147; diptImit 406 X., ,,.1 11) 6) 12) dom. tree /shrub /ground spp. OBL, FACW, & /or FAC: /4 0. 1 ' 1� /'el % Hydrophytiic vegetation? iv.Yes _.,_,No ,1 Comments dr Y1 edit'.: ° 14)1; d 5't1,CG0.S ✓ �+ ,aese4. �! ' � 4.,_l 1, ' - 1...1 l J 1-.J ..,.! '' 1 l�IL�I..J�IW7 r -, LLB'.• W Series and phase: ilk' & 4.36 acEedo. On hydric soils list? _Yes No Mottled? _Yes' No Gleyed? !Yes _No Hydric components: nsms3, Depth 6. IP Matrix color: , to "d' 3/ s Mottle Color 'r” Notes.__ eae dam. Depth Matrix colon Mottle Color: Notes: re 0 .�..... Depth Matrix color: Mottle Color: Notes Other indicators: Hydric soils? es _No Basis: _very low chrorna _low chroma with mottles "'gleyed _high chroma _Presumed aquic moisture regime. Comments: Hydrology r-SI Elf sefEBe eee S 5 Inundated ?: _Yes 1-'No Depth to standing water: ' d/ Saturated? ` 'es _No 00 Depth to saturated soil . Other indicators:._,,. Wetilante hydrology: 1-"Yes _No Basis: oPinundatedisaturated soil _Topo Aa h y _Evidence of Seasonal Pooling. Other: are._ , Do normal environmental conditions exist at this site? „ewes _No. If no, explain below: Atypical situation: _Yes No Explain: �:7C�71�C J r,- =5- Wetland Deternminatio, £Yes _No. Rationale:, :;50fi '' .. A' ..,,/;/'. H1'4444 .644'4444111._d_../1401;454.7 General Comments:; EnviroSclence, Inge WETLAND DETERMINATION FORM .t ... ,}.... Field Investi ator(s). l✓ryviroscience Inc. CnrdYal..,,...,EF 'Dated 10 /0 / 1' 93 3 Project Site: Waveri Estates State Ore' on County: Washiion Applicant/O ivner~. Ken Wa mire Plant Community :,_ - 014740. Sample Point �...._._ Township 02S Range: 01 .. Section :, t 4 sv�r ne GexiusSp°ties Code Form lnd.Status % Genus$9,pcies Code Form [i d, Status, ! 1)4 eqd f re Fib a 7) peolgrat ".. 2)(;P d 71. "nF- /0 8) 3)/ /vo 4iftikagkezMr. 5,42,4) tpx.. 6 11) .r,.... `.. ._....,�. �.. 6) Amu Fo, per'' 'r 12) dom. tree /shrub /ground spp. OBL, r`ACW J, z /or FAC. le o / �`�` / '' % a Hydrophytic vegetation? Plres _No ra.7 ra 7° COmments: 4ra‘a4. 4 �t P CGdP.'.5I a" 144.,1, tr—r' •.• �i ^..• +L�fJ��l`_�'Lll.'�.IL:C•s j�••W�'��'�,.y_IC �r•:_:�J'- f'^a_]� C;:! • �J�1�1� +'+.:.1`i�IJ�r.= 'I:�1L .�.J��r�• Series and phase: 'f / " * `t On hydric soils list? _Yes fo Mottled? es _No Gleyed? v'Yes _ 1'o Hydrpc compnnents %ar1. .�..._ ao• .' ...._ „, Depth 4 � :_ Matrix color lb Ye 5.4- Mottle Color:`5 dotes. . Depth Matrix color` Mott!,!.: Color _ Notes :._.,, Depth _ Matrix color: 4 tt e Color: Notes _ Othets indicators: r” a 3,9 <6.Z. iiyc ric s , _.,Yes „ ,i` �o Basis: _very low chroma low chrome with roll' tt es t'lleyed _high chroma �!` Presumed aquic ntioisture regime. Comments :: . :. ., ,� "ail >id ' Inundated ?: _Yes ego Depth to standing water /CI' Saturated? '1es Depth to saturated soil: � �e'a�- _, Other indicators :. ..,�,. Wetland hydrology: es _No. Basis:. In undated/saturated soil Topography _l✓vit°lence of Seasonal Pooling. 'Other_ a t' _. a `st at this site Yes Do normal environmental c ndi ions, x� ? 01" ,_No. If no, explain below: Atypical situation: _Yes _No. Explain: .,.�.�. Wetland Determination? Yes _No. Rati ®nale.ge ctahei. _ —,.�. 'raj " cue t_4-2 General Crmtnents: _+hir j 5 x nviroScience fnc Menlagnagegiagairmilawasemana WETLAND Field Investigator(s): Enviroscience inc; Iditiaa _ EP Date: 10 130_/ 1993, Project Site: \Waved Estates _State: Qre n _„County d'ashi!gto¢t Applicant/Owner: Ken Wa, mire _.._..Plant Community: celd Sample Point �,,.�., Township: 0.2`3 Range Section: 14 sw CenusS„pecaes Code Form Ind;: talus % GfanusSt_ecies 'o,de Form h dattis % 1 3) M d0104.- s , .,GU .. 3,1: 9) " )..�:.......�r.��...• .�.....e...... a.. «..rte 1.2) % dons. tree /shrub /ground spp. OBL, FACW, &lor FAC: ';.....I l., .......% Hydrophytic vegetation? „Yes ..,, der Comments: ., � .fir' 1, fps_', ; e t o1` °i sigavo Series and phase:., !'fa7°s ,(fin hydre soils deist? _._.:Yes hio Mottled? Iiies O'No Gleyed9 _Yes PO Hydrnc components: 1 't ..., Depth Matrix color: _/aY ''? Mottle Color: ,./i? Notes: Depth Matrix color.._.....:r.Mottle Color: _ Notes: Depth _ - - -- Ma4ix color: _ Mottle Color: . Notes. Other irdicators: yd ie soils? .Yes Ica Basis: _very low chroma _low r' coma with mottles __gleyed _high h chroma _Presumed aquic moisture regime. Comments: lly rOAo ysa - r aorta 'Eac8G8eafeef �!�° It�u�ddated? _Yes �°�No Depth to standing water: Saturated? _Yes fil‘to ;Depth to saturated soil :_,.. 8'" Oth t indicators: 'iG 1e Wetland hydrology: __Yes fr! o Basis: _inundated /saturated soil ,_Topography __Evidence or Seasonal Fooling Other :_ Do normal "s,vironniental conditions exist at this site? J es No If no, explain below: Atypical situation _Yes No Explain: Wetland tern n at on` _Yes tfrNo. Rationale: 1.Eit5 _General COHi1lmen tS. _ G�rrt9 :r1 EriviroScience, � c ar. tik t ;ixr' WETLAND DETERMi_ ,'AThON FORM Field Investigator(s): Envircicience Inc. Initial: EP Date: _al / 1993 Project Site :. 'dVaveril' Estates Applicant/0 wner: Ken Ta„ymire ._ Sample Point _....�1 Townslhip: GenusSiecies Code Form Ind.Status % _ _r_..State:_ Oregon. County ashir ton Plant Community: P `re, .,.3i3►, t3 Range: O1 Section: 1.4_, sw ne; , GenusSfeciec Code Form lnd.Statns %© 1) l� y �5 F � .3 7) 2) c a i 3) , 2•1‘14_4" lro i. 9) f )0 10) 11) 6) % do m, tree /shrub /ground spy►. OBL, FACW, &., /or� FAC: /6 / / 67 Hydrep�hytic vegetation? es _No 73 t'a Comments: 1 t a,4' r" % Zakd d .;c 4�r0 C.,�d�t.�.I �Jt�JI.�J:;.:16�Jt.��J L��1L.: JG�J�.`• MtlIG�I. ��' 7L. 3f�J��C. JWt� ..J�1`1��L�..'.IL�l�— �']�I��J L�J{�'.1t_..I��•'Jt.��'J �•'.'•JI��'J��- ••t�..71� Series and. phase: 57 5. On hydrke soils list? _Yes islo Waled? °� _Yes _No Gleyed? . Yes _No Hydric components: r,Ai , Depth Matrix color l° �' Mottle Color 1_4_1 ' Depth �� IVdat►:n color: Mottle Color:. Notes: Depth Matrix color f' of le Color Notes :. Other indicators: yd�ie soaps des _No Basis: _very low chroma _low chroma with rmottles ,,,._g eyed high chroma c Presumed agu c moisture regime. Comments �, ' hind 4 / luunthr;ed?: Yes No Depth to standing water: .:>/k rr Saturated? Yes _No Dep th to saturated soil: /2 r Other indicators: ,�02.l°:,� kze Wednd h dolo es �' gy _No G�a�ts �, _` _.._,inundated /�f�tw�'ated 'oil _Topography evidence of Seasonal Pooling. Other Do normal e,!ivironmerital conditions exist at this site? Ke s ,_..No, If no explain below: At yp ical situation: _Yes _No. Explain. Eea,!,..,,✓, Wetland Deton inationi? ries _,_No: Rationale: war �' - kt a -icei 4.14i m1 a General Comments: EnviroScience, Inc, [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] Northwest v I Pa ign, Inc. 9130 SW Pio leer Court, Suite E, Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 503 / 382.8687 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: City of Tigard 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. P. 0, Box 23397 g Oregon Tigard, .Ore on 97223 WE ARE SENDING YOU [x] Attached [ ] Under separate cover via IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT [ ] Shop Drawings [ ] Copy of letter ( ans [ l [ ] Specifications [ ] Change order [ ] Prints DATE: 4/5/93 JOB NO. 02-195 ATTENTION: Mr. Larry Epstr ir' RE: Waverly Estates/Ken W :ymnire RECEIVED 'APR 5 1993 COPIES 1 DATE DESCRIPTION [] the following items Samples Application Acknowledgment Letter. From Oregon Division; of State Lands Application Acknowledgment Letter From Army Corp. of Engineers Army Corp. of Engineers Permit Application Evidence of Previous Project Showing fir,. & Mrs. Wayniire's Immornemstruodasnwormaassov Contribution of Land to the City of Tigard THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below [ ] For approval [ ] Approved as submitted ] For your use [ ] Approved as noted [x] As requested [ ] Returned for correction [] [ FOR J3 IL S DUE �._ 19 [ ] Resubmit . copies for approval [ ] Submit -- copies for distribution [ ] Return corrected prints [x] For review and comment [ ] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Attached are copies of ODSL Response Letter and :Army Corp. of Engrs. Response n °, Estates /Kenneth Waymire project ais Permit Application And. Res arse Letter for ViT�v�. � . requested. If there is anything else that { you need o. _ you have any uestions: lease Y 9 Yq. '.p hesitate to call Also, attached project s owii Mr. l Mrs. aymire ed is the evidence of previous p je g contribution of and to the City of Tigard. COPY TO C 'NY • isatit fi RECEIVED MANNINO APR 5 1993 Response to Staff Report City of Tigard, Oregon March 30,1993 Friends of Cook Park • Wetlands Impact Statement. Request that we are given time to find an alternative source to issue a statement. • Buffer of trees and fence between property and wetlands. In addition to the 25 foot buffer that is standard requirement, we are requesting a fence be constructed to protect the wetland:,, *Refer to Corp of Engineers Report. • Follow Surface Water Management Regulations . , requiring the construction of on -sit e water quality facilities. This should be located where lots 20 and 21 are proposed otherwise have v.oap suds, oil and needles draining into wetlands. *propose no fee in leu of water quality facility. ▪ Clarify what is meant by a temporary turn around at the end of the "temporary" dead end street. The fire access road is unclear and needs to be reviewed by the Tualitin Valley Fire District ` for approval. • Review of proposed grading plans in areas with greater than a 25 percent s e e I have requested a developmen inventory from the soil conservation service and am waiting for their report. I am requesting that this report be included in our response when it is issued. *This will provide expert advice and c orarnrent on the ®soi l S P ss the issue *ime�a.f i�;al ly��.tlarp�l�addcel have on the of erosion which' io in line with Tigard's Comprehensive Plan page II -13 item 2. 6, Ensure permits from the Division of State Lands and Corpo of Engineers are obtained. q.. a� a.'t This is a standard requirement and we want on record that these permits be obtained per our request. 7. Tree removal permit obtained that .nc 1 udes a tree survey identifyihg trees over 6 inches in diameter and justification for removal. Requesting that minimal tree removal be incorporated this subdivision and that additional trees be planted toi provide a buffer between the park and the development. Also, identify lot placements around the trees, to retain more trees. This is in line with Ci.tY Pf Tigard' policy 3.4.2 that development proposals do not s* bst P Y an t!al ly: alter the character of the trees or major vegetation. Sanitary sewer designed to avoid we,t j arid/ lensiti „e lend crossings This is °►3 ra commendation, rcm the Unified '. sewerage Agency that has re Viewed '+ .• h d in �'�u.e�ved - thy.:, �.eve,lopr'ne, ,. �: ar*_.� we are �.n , agree mesat with them. 9. Buffer /fence between development and Thomas Dairy' Friends cf Cook Park value the positive influence the Thomas Dairy has on the park and request a fence be placed as a i er of safety. h�tt, Talked with Frank I-lodapp, who works for the school district and he indicated that a `of t e cyclone fence will be between the proposed development and the Nigh School. *The purpose of the fence is to protect the property owner. and the school from pote'r vial p. oblems . r` a propose that a fence be constructed for the same re <<sons. ALSO VANT TO NOTE UNDER THE CGMMUN I TY DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OP WASHINGTON COUNTY ,PEOPLE IN NEWER DEVELOPMENTS HAVE TO SIGN WAIVERS (NON-REMONSTRANCE) THAT GIVE UP THEIR RIGHT TO COMPLAIN TO THE C i TY Of T I GA.IV'.D ABOUT THE FARM. BOB CONE FROM THE LAND USE D I V �, ALSO, (TALKED �� THE DEVELOPER IS REQUIRED TO PUT A NOTICE UP ON THE PROPERTY THAT THERE ARE SMELL, _NOISE AND FLY LIMITATIONS. 10: Stream a1�.lcewed to flow naturally into wetlands. A class II perinea! stream flows through this property, need clarification of the staff report. This stream natural l f iltra tai . � on fo r the wetlands and the road should be adjusted accordingly to allow natural flow. We recommend' that the stream not be piped- Additional recommendations: April S, 1993 1. The road that enters the property be adjusted so that lots 1 and 2 be removed and the road curve around to avoid the streafe 2 Islands of trees be formed bet*o.en lots 15 and 24 on :''dent Drive. Also leave island of trees on the side s t.'eets such as Lloyd court and Tyrone Cotirt. Please refer to GenesiF Loop in Tigard that has ,'existing islands of 'trees.' Acc)'rding to the plates the .Friends of 'Cook Park have reviewed, the water line and the sewer line would go ditrectly throught to the wetlands. Even: though , an . existing sewer'i'ine exists' Jin the wet .ands, ire recaktmer that a +" alternative route be explored to avoid the Wetlands completely. These wetlands have already been . enhanced, and ti dig around in this area again Would cause more disturbance . to the Plants and wildli, fee The report from the school district indicated that the schools in the area are already at full capacity.' Most of us whe have children at Durham school, which would serve this development, are well aware of the averck 1 rding that has orcured. We would recommend that the size of the develi,pment be reduced icy at least /8 lots to account for this. The lots reMoved would include: 1 , 2, 3,17,18,19,20,2 , 22, 25, 29, 30, 3i , 36,, 37, 3S, 39 and 40. Removal of these lots would also accomplish the following: A. Provide good buffer between opmvmt. bul`er between farm and development. B. Provide between i; t. . Avoid removal of established trees. b. Avoid extreme disturbance of stream. .r. •Tr 25103e41..00300 4 •o-.4••.n•e.•r.• RC'&DR, ALTHEA 11 C 13745 SW 121ST AVE TIGARD OR 97223 2S10300.-00500 .. • .... BECHTOLD, ELLEN YVONNE 13825 SW 121ST AVE TIGABD OR 9/222 p� ay /� 2S103CC- 4.01704 .. ....... . .....a • • ZIMMERMAN, LIN A EATHERINE 11990 SW ROSE VISTA DR TIGARD OR 97223 281030E -02100 ...•.., •. KOR, PAUL & MARYLIN 12060 SW ROSE VISTA DRIVE' TIGARD OR 97223 2S10300,4 G300 • • o . o . s '4 • • • e u o s o • e • • • 1ABSON9 DONALD J AND NAiW O ' I 1.3870 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 2S103Gc...02500 . .. . MCC;AIN, DANIEL A & BETTY J 13950 SW 121OT TIGI.D OR 97223 fi.. ?r. • 28110t3B-00300 44440444 e••.ee •.ee e OLSON, HERBERT ERMA F E 11910 SW GAARDE TIGARD' OR 97224 2510400 -00100 ea•oeeeeee•••eek;•ei6. NOC+RB 0 CORDON ELAINE 1353; L) 121ST AVE TIGABD OR 91223 251040C -0570. MEF INTERNATIONAL 1201 SW 12T I #320 PORTLAND OR 97205 2810 -00400 ..........q... BEOWZOLD .p ELLEN Y 0NA 13825 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 25103CC- 01600 �••�•erso•.•••.•••.e. i HELTON, JAMES 0 /JUDY C 12015 SW GAARDE ST TIGARD OR 97224 25.103CC41800 •..ieGn••.e••.u•e...• ASGIAN, ARTHUR $ 12000 SW ROSk VISTA TIGARD OR 97223 2E103CC 02200 ................ • ROLL, WAYNE J DomtRA T 13810 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 2810300 -02400 ......4.............. RITCHIE, DAVID 4 AND BETTY S 11910 SW 121ST AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 2S1 0BE 00200 •••e.•.s•e.••s.•e•eM LANDSTROM, MARIAN G AND CAW 12000 SW GAARDE ST TIGARD OR 97223 2511055- .00600 4444444644.0444444440 aoRmsomo VIRGINIA ET At ALES, ROBERT R ET Air 12500 SW 'BULL MTN9 TIGARD OR 97224 2810400-00300 44444.o.4404‘400444140 M0ORE, GORDON ELAINE 13535 SW 121ST AVE TIGARD OR 97223 • •e. 215109AA -00100 oe..•eii«.eo.d••r,tx•..o WASHINGTON COUNTY FACT. TIE. a� '.. � �Mx= .�tltd tsp. ?IBST AVE, ,, Itti B -7 HI tiLSB0RO OR ; 01124 2S109AA -00200 .soee••• .eue6•em•eoo REIN'HAE�T, STEVEN N AND CYNTHIA S 14035 SW� 1:25T3 A66 T7 GAND . C)R 97224 25109AA 00300 s•_•seaio•• i.o••d.8 ®oam WALICER RIC I A ANA SHIP D • •14215 sW 125TR TIG.RD, OR 97229 yr- 1 April 6, 1993 Mr. Ron. Pomery Planning Department City of Tigard 13125 9. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 REGARDING: Waverly Ca n atruction l ro f .t /Cook Park Dear Nr. Pomery: y For approximately the last seven years we have been dc'veloping a twenty acre parcel Cook Park & During these Proceedings the �ermit;s that were required were beyond anybody's imagination, As of this date we are approximately 857 complete with the restoration of turning this wetland area into a true year- round wetlands for both fowl and people. At the last hearing with the City p , it was vtated �Oy se F eral individuals that what we have done is 'detrimental. As I stated earlier, we have been aggr'essivel working on this property *for seven years. During this period there has been a significant,, 3 of Tigard used a.ncreaav in wild life activity as well as the l.at p such as archery, overflow parkin g %a d watching, etc. which certainly contradicts the statements made by these people at that hearing. We feel very fortunate in being able to contribute to the effort of the City of Tigard to improve Cook Park. . were o We also wer of Engineers both vertlally and in writing that what • led by the Corps g y .. ' requirements . F this of their re uirements (permit 33 wCFR 33 @achieved (a) d12)) but as all ; a e� ", made. this • 33 °7 �;raj�l21: • y parcel p : �* a and people. We ` bot�'�! compatible for wild life acre arcel of a so h.is vti ed engineeering, can ..+�d'ry' easily prove that because F area we were able to hold a .._ -.. � ...... � .. � rani _ water �., prdaoe�� whereby in the entire wetlands s .... . y two .. which would • rati��.n•Lain a the area e�aiaadwb •t tal y dried year -round riot. to. this she ar Y d level area �heY-eas y F winter. up in the summer and drain across solved and at oo t��:da�rable expense Both of these problems have been to Use t Y4' The mitigation vt7iirk has Provided seven acres of wet. an•46 and thirteen acres of uplands vrhere a five acre meandering wetlands existed. We would hope that anyone making judge nentst. takes Fntc consideration the improvements made as well P°: the groat advantage of single family homes in this area. Hr. Waymire has designed the development to save 71% of Joh,ir trees. He has maned 9eh of the cedar grove. We be1i �vr- this i a good sheplherdin � of cur resource shot = eliminating Rik developments Very truly yours, BEFORE T02 LAND USE BEARINGS OFFICER FOR TOR Catiar OF TTIG r OREGON Regarding an application by Ken Waymire on behalf of R.A. and Linda Gray and Charles and Sada Lairib for Subdivision and Senoit2.'e Lands 8evI oarw approval. ' . LIM/MA.RY OF THE REQUEST St$bdi vL5i1.an SUB 93 -0007 / Sensitive Laads Keview SLR 93 -0004 *.. <a�nr j. to taiv►�ii one The applicant re eettla o 1) Subdivision app. g 5 e few into 48 buildable ,,,. approximately 7 « acres �..n� 48 S� rnd � j -.s between 4,445 and 10,080 qn lots aran.,�i� -�. Sensitive Lands aapps'ova1. to allow to allows grading and filling for con .:.t ction of street improvements on ] -std designated as a wetland and for modifications to land with a slope granter than 2S percent. APPLICANT: Man Waymire 31035 SW Country ifiew Lane Wilsonville, OR 91'070 ne: li . A:. and Linda Gray PO Box 1016 Sherwood aC 97140 Cliar1e + and Eada Lamb 13770 SW Fern Tigard, OR 97223 Sa.:ho 1 District 2347 23137 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 C0 REEKN3 _. N DES "GNATI z B di u q -Dear lA Y Rr sides is '. guava DESIGNAVION: R -12 SRieadentialy 12 Unite per here) A potion of 1atAl .Dfl SW 92nd Menus �twaen Tigard High a, � 1 and LOCATION:, � COok Park (WG"?°as 2S1 14A, tax lots 100 T,...�a► v� ' ... _ lOi i %t Code Chapters 16, 1 d .92, ... ...... it 54 1,A.�4, 1�8.S�n 1a i A 'a APL�I� I:,w 1�� ity�B�6 � � e:'se.�M iV® hla� I�liC3.�p1 1.10 tad 18,164, Goat ar 16,100 1�3 � �:(� r r .. .. g.q 1 qy c. q 7 q. 7 w,. 4. 4, 8.1.10 acrd 8.1.3 e7ew1:..A% 4i6..�ll 70:8: «Z / d`.�eal:� ... i rural subject to conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: �� ' REARINGs opipxcEl 9j-0004 / WAYM sus 93-000/ / stit PAGE 1 key 3[T !'INDZUGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS Ba�c �isii r lflF rnatioat TIM City Omuta' agprOved the redesignation of tax lot 2000 from Low- Density Rezidential to ' iun -4)an ity Residential, and a zone change free R-7(PD) to A-3,2 (later R42), on December 5, 1983. The Ilearings Officer appro�` MVP 90-0001 on ffuly 17, 1990 al/ ow tng the Southern portion of thu property in question 110 be developed with f"lur ball £i.elda and aeaociax site w:ro;` ement$c. This approval was valL,d until January 27, 1992. A one yam exten ai n was rega &sated and qta rated tbitteby extending this approval until .1'421nuary 27,. 1993. Since ,1992, substantial modifications of the ball field area mad wetlands have been completed to allow cunti anse►`« ion of the conditional use approval. There are two r.a*iitional applications filed ns a coon d with this application. A lot line adjustment (1 IS 93-0002) p.�? h 11, 1993 which added a portion of the Tigard Nish School cite (tax lot School :'4O) to the Subject parcel. Also, 1%ln= 1% .= land partition (14LP 93-0003) taw been approved which dividem tax ict 100 into two parcels. These ad jus+ eontc have not yet been, made at liOnthington County. Eobx"...th tirtarti v - Tigard Digh School is listed as property owner in this application review. TL ese the application proceo ses + ou ld have . reviewed as one application„ th ,re is no revisor ...Kant obligaati�w;t the applicants to do so. There hav .. been no ether appl fix '1 i.cati�; with the City for this sits. B. !i i.. '.tv Info t oaa , Su w .. anti Dseaea t That. Ticrate Digh School property is located to the nartl. of the subject Site. Knueeland Eatnteo Subdivision Um* to the northwest. Cook Paaurk lies to the west and south if the propezrtz These nOighbo ti - I:, ,°. -tifte are zoi d R9 -4.5 and are Located wit? iaa the City of T .g .' Thv Tho seaail Jersey Dam Perm which is within utilliderpOrated itatthititton Con '" !!y Lb located to the east and seou .beat.st of the subject propetty and is dvadicpiLttOd LOW DCns t4 Oh the Dit` = e CoMpis eh = •naive Plan Map. To the nortbeaa t, and eaat is tie Unified i ewerage _Agency a Outten" Advanced Waji:teWater treattneint P:. ant. "tineury vropertiee are dss ign tted ilcar Light zndnetriaal nee in the City se Cosprehensive Ian and are sated Yatdristri .1 ?a. ( -ja A,00ees to the itUbjebt property isa provided by Stt 92nd Ave we which eixteendse stout! 'arc frame' buirhait Road tw.+i took park. Southwest 92nd itittentie is functionally" claecified aa>s a >iitica0r colt: ®motor Street by the Oity ®e' Tfanepottation ,Plan k &ip. SetithWEiOt 92nd A;Ven>"e is not fully inproved adjacent; t9 the subject Site m . site ts�ti De s ri o : Taut tot 1000 domaets Of 26 d 27 acres. The approval of Niudt end Pa'tit io" at ti 93 0003 reduc®sa the eitee ` of the -0jCOt e a tee to 11.12 acre'. the paatcel iss llodaabee l oh a etoded i illnide which dropsss, a . vet; caul r p linear d of approximately 44 • _ d feet. hgprdaaciiaaately 3.9 ' aches Of the site id dfseatatxece Of �� feet ��r a la�ear ellataaac usic%evelopable due to SUB 03 -0007 / SLR 93-0064 INGS OF X Y / W PUB 2 ar . ,. �.Ii1t®1��.y uxn�lewe� �pedt. � `~i11�"! steep slopes s rind wetlands. Tlie E `'' r'43' Le comp its a.leo contains a aamixturs of ,oa~a ®aess, brushy vsgetation and maatur 111 s APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS ` i. chair l 4 contains stendatio for the R -12 tone. A mi gleq faay detached residential unit LA �le�ts�is� UFO must comply Detached single-family reaidest n1. with the following dimensional requirements: NInimum lot si Aa front astbsdk G race! setback Interior el deyard setbsek Corner side yard setback Rear setback is building height 3, 050 square fe t 15 feat 29 feet 5 feet' 10 feet 15 feat 35 feet cbapter 0111 states that landf or alterations wi U wetland areas at feet the 'jurisdictional t ir pg criteria the division of State Inds ((T a r VS e t Emgineeta o Unified Sewerage Agency j .. . CUBA) of er f Aral v state Or �o�al aq nvies. The afCrea C ty 62 Tigard Sorneitty trt�ci�#raeee��'; �1 other Lands Pe rrAit for this Puss is not es�s:aa- e applicable City irc ante sss< t be xatisf tad, includinQ � Oeneitive lands peace arenameeting nt n wetland ssaasnsaitit ., �E� for land criteria. Since %h.. applicant p s*s to itodity the �s1�0a he�%i 25 percent g e1ra�ixnag�ta�y and to edify ;ales+® greater 1Q a deneitive lends permit shall be requiTed es per Rect tO 4. l at :m states that such a permit shell be Obta3ned forc condtructien or dOvelopment mains t ithi n ..bane areas. The a pP r aVa3 crier ,�r � to e Ye are lstad in Section 18.-414,12.1169.1111. nee appli��ablc tOrla are: 7. The extent and natir® of the p�� land for alteration or dt ba nt �i %1 net create s £tn diatvraaadea te t120 extent greater than that required for than use; 2. jgrOpa ,Led land foam alteiration alteration or development 0111 'net result in erosion, stream s e imentation'. ground jnneta bi1ity, or other adaerms on- esitea and off-site effects or hazards to life or proPertY, 3. The water flew ca acity ... of the d6rainas gew4' i %e s decreer edf . , r► land .. _ . .. ,.. area � ford where nas�t»ra7. v�agQt��.ti.oan had been not due covered �� alteration or development, >ent, thei HERRINGS orricagn SUB 93 -0007 6 SI h! 91 -o®0 vow PAWS , structures or impervious ainrfaea will be replanted rated to' peevent erosion - in aeradanCe with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening; a. The drainagWtay will he replaced by a public facility of adequate site to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan; and b. The necessary `'U.S. 1 xrny Corps of %ineera and State of d 4rn Land Board, Division of State Las approvals shall be obtained. Clutpter S. BS.O4 0 'n. l avant a te►ta' ndet s for new ia..,`........�... r t. A lot Genets the ba ,. - aitx® gaoler access c�.a: '� lot residential, development. of 90 feet �rs�aaos� and etas lard if it has a Fa sound diimenaicn Wain a front lot aim that is orieurted within 30 degesies of a true eaat; wa it as `.s. A ,utdivie on covel,tec with the basic requirement if W)% or more Of tie newly crieatsi d lots meet or exceed this eialtasndardd. • chapter 18.9 ?.020 ce to ins standards for deneity. The number of dwelling unites permitted is wed on the net development area, excluding sensitive land areas cad land dedicated for public r oe parks, air for private ra�edwaya. This laid area ;le then divided �° zoning district by the minimum parcel Lime permitted. created on a site. determine the nui r of lots which may Chapter 101,zgy ° -9, sp. ec i fi_e, s vL sion clearance ranc e tr.. iang les ad j aC* nt to inner ®ecti< which the height of plicatisgs, signs, etc. are limited to tbt: * in h9iyht t..c assure cafe and kdeliquate CL b d i Vance oW eect.an® to reduce potential hazards fie vehieelac tunaine Alternatively, trees may be limbed t L v. to eight feet ...xi height. 6 � Chapter 8.1�-R - � A contains s. t_ a . .. . , lards for dingle4f w. l y residential vehiceler se Musn . A private acceasmsy which h serves between three co six i ree dunce® must be a a�iini of 30 �, .. feet wide with a mini : � pavement tdd,dth of at least 2 4 Sao curbs and a t , ay• t for rev, al of gees ®2 I requirei a permit • Chapter �,� � ®,��' having a trunk 6 Lichee ®t were in diameter eea rured tour ur feat awe the grcnnd on undeveloped residential land. A te t for twee rya t _ met comply with the following caiter a as specified to tier d.„ . x.50 A ®► ..... The s are diseased, Irreaaaat a clanger to p Lrtye or h� trams .... interfere eith utility Service or tr ffic safety The trees have pr�r • otherwise construct to � removed ..,i®+� ut3.�,�.'� +� s��+a�t `® ........ rate � tsar. prey in a reasonable manner: RINGS OPFXCN ORe - I MB / 'WAYMIRE SUB 93-0007 / !Mk 934-0004 PAM 4 '0 ' N.p • - • The trees are not needed to prevent erasion, instability, or draa.anaa a prob►l , • . The tree° are not needed to p;otect , nearby 'treat AS alarice between shade 5 windbreaks or ad � desirable b A e,. The aeet etiC character the area will not be visually advert ly affected by the tree sal: and ▪ nee vegetation planted by th applicant, if any, mall replace the aesthetic value of tea to be cut.. Chapter AL61.0,2,,,Ipsista contains etanderda for the subdividing viding o parcels into 4 or more 1o' e, To be approved, a Preliminary' plat met comply with the following oriteria a® The pry ®al mat comply with the bite ° e 'oeprehenaive Plan, the applicable scning ordinance and other applicable ordinances and requlat ions P • The proposed plat name rust not be duplicative and moat otherwise satisfy the provieia of CBS Chapter 92,E c. Th treete and roads must be laid out Sao as to conform to the plate of eubdiv►ieione arid snaps of Partitions or ivi already a��+a�d approved for adioining property ae to width, general direction im all other reapecte unless the City determines it i . in h3 pablica interest to modify the street or road patterns r.+� • An explanation has A been provided for all common isprove ente m • chapter f4 contains standards for streets and utilitileea Section aE ;��O CX1 requires strwats within and adjoining a development to be dedicated. and impsoved based on the classification of the ;street b• d ... • • '�./... meet® tai be Seortit�in 10 �.�4 �J3A. lL„� � 1 �t rei.re® l.oa�as71 e ccan®trs'ct�l with J4 feet Of' a within in a �D fit right Tway. �. .... S ' t ion i86164:060 A p rohibit depth' _ ircieg 'being afire thiA.n '. 2A tined the loin ii.410tia and retjuirea, at twat have at leant 25 Beet of frontage on public or privato ®ttttap lib other than alp, Ailey. section L a 1 4:a 0 e.. adjoining all �iulia 4. q i+�ewel ., residential etreete' • Section la requiren annitazy server Serric SUB 93 -0007 / 93.0004 Mee' S fa. Sect,ien . 8 1affi1. 00 requires adequate prov'J,eione for Storms water runoff and d itcation of eae mentw , r stoma drainage fazcilitiea. A i» %at le retLennai a Pl , p9,iciee.. 1. Policy 2.11 provides, City will as inure that ci.tisaws will be provided an opportunity to participate . in all Ott gas of tilt. planning and development review process. 2. Po liar 3.1.1 provides n arena fi:� entif led as a�►v�.dea�i that all development containing wetlands and al. j$ a in excess of 25% grade he designed to comply with gioaeerin9 techniq ues ga te make the =TA euita ble for, the proposed deatlelorment. • policy 4.2.1 provides that all l w d lQ i of t within , fdarhe al T iges tateu _ d tanning area shall c /an d ith a liCbIe; planning water quality et a • • Policy 7.1.2 provides thee City will respire ae, a condition of development approval than public water, sewer, ard storm drainage will be provided and designed to City etantelards and utilities placed underground. • Policy 7.3.1 p ravidea the City will coogc w »y..- a t e ee � a ®e ith water districts • Poliay 7.4.4 a ell .. kfeeft t,',4 be connected to a�in app sanitary ry ear system. 1 =WILMA that the development be eerved by a water a em haVing adequate Water p ro Cure fat ti.e protection pur eetiOi and that the P e District twilit*. all ®uich tasppll.catione. ides tY,e City t .. .. . , �.�.1, plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway System that a :iarr'ent needle anticipated future growth and dotvelopepont. y 9. ' Policy q � . - a precondition Of �s1e ��'' �,tl�ee t�� city w�,,l�l. require ate app al that: a v, DeVeldpment abut a dedicated aatreot or have other adetu ales® y :gym Street right -of�way ahaal lire dedicated where the street fr i'atibeatandard in width c t tc conaatructiait o the curbs de ,aa ks l City ottottiltr4i, within the ded el t 0 the 30 ehaall paattioipato IA the 6* Dating [fit te9tdi, curbs, and sa3dewel�� t� 'Oita , dizotelopmeotis bovietts# 138112/NGS OFFICERGRAY SUB 93-0001 / SLR 93 -0004 tarmac Street improvements shall be made and otteet signs or signals Johan be provided when the development Le found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. Tigard Water District states that, although they Nave no ehjectione to the proposal, 1, the District will r s of the . main p,� require/ that _era 8 inch � � t�ra3tSter be extended fares CV 92nd Avow * to the octet end project. Firm__ hydrant placement will be coordinated between Tualatin Valley Fire , Rescue and the Water District The Unified Sewerage Agency (USA has cou enteda ae. A water quality facility, demLgned to remoVe 65 percent of ti; o phosphorous © percent of the new proposed ia�sviouesurface should 'metalled. project ewe net meet the criteria for allowing the fee in lien of such a facility. The following infarmetie ►n should be required with the plan for the facility: Ciacntations of phosphoroue removal. Lanetecape plan of the fanci tty� Maintein nce plan of the facilitro . A hydrological anal ..sis of the taatersheed to determine t impact y Y - stre facilities sTeduld of a 100 year store on the doa�n w be required. c. The 25 foot undisturbed corridor shall be contained in a► tract, ®emirate iron Any lOta and ehonld be fenced,. The water quality facility cannot .iae eithi A the undisturbed corridor unleas additional buffer ave. is mitigated, d. Walthintrton county Flood Plain ) apse Corps oaf Rneineaer maps and FNMA maps as l indicate the flood ritai a elevation in the area Of this project to be 126 feet above mean sem Leval, net 125 feet as indicated on the applicant's plans. Does the City of Tigard hies differing inforation Detail drawings s ofd ma �lOs, catch basin ,, ba Ckf ill ate., have not been includeldo..vitt ::sass net Patch basins sal ham an it inch Dump. µ. O. e .. t t plan acs to the . .. et�a:°!a<! lives t�+.i,�:l be �*eca airy does f a A redesign ►�f • li+� water Nqual ,qty iaacili t,,o requi rdedet. the exi s p provide for ito tin/ drainage fear many of the leis. aaa` part3 ].a , iota 24, g5o 26, 33, 34 and 43 A drainage plan is needed shoving that flee will be dieia3i rated before 10eititiO thee lot when diedheriling footing and ... t c an aaraam raxe�g eainei t� tRia� It loc like the eaa nitaarty could _... , g no there area .. eaaraearaae cca deer � d atland eenditivea land crcaaein�ga�e The k401: c, 1d not sea many �• .� BEARINGS OFFICER SUB 93-0007 / SLR 93-8004 MS ? • not approve the long lateral aeruing some of the lots. It looks questionable as to Whether the lots on the south aide of SW Kent Drive can be served by gravity beeed on the five foot centaur lines. GTE has reviewed this proposal aad has reque'ated that the developer /builder contact GTE at leant 30 days .prior to trench c erring. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed thie proposal and has commented that there are no provisions for storm drainage from lots 24, 25, 26, 33 and 34. T� ,, chexa ,jlies+`,,,trj.ct 23J has reviewed the D oponal and has noted that the ;proposed developnert is projected to generate 18 new students for Durbius Elementary School, 6 students at Twality Middle School, and 4 students at Tigard nigh School,. The School District notes that school capacities at the High 'school and Durhat Elementary School are already exceed, although Twality Middle School is presently below capacity. The District notes that the cere facility of both the High School and Durham Elementary School are _ insufficient to be able to consider portable additions. Additional school capacity may bo provided by other options under consideration by the School District, £naludings grade level reeonfi oration, rescheduled school year, boundary adjust t®, double shifting, buiding to Under- utilised facilities, future bond measures leading to construction of new f acilitiess and other' Schoaa housing options. 6. Neighborhood Planning orga>raiaation (MP0 6) reviewed this applicatlon March � segue ®ta that the City postpone 30 h i . d. to enable the NPO to review the staff report and any Ot Near =metes available prior to the bearitel In addition to the March 17 INFO meting, which wan staffed by Senior Planner Dick Bestersdorff, the applicant attended a previous 1110 Meeti to n with those attending. by Thissgi®revious �.bMeeti.n design also a attended �.vby s ociute Planner Jerry Offer. The etaf f re comeend Ation is available for public review at least seven days prior to the public hearing. When IWO mist, and cetetnentli nubmfttedl by other utility and reviewing agencies, are submitted Within the reviihw period, they are included within the staff recommendation. kdli agencies and the public have an opportity to reviewer this t _ hoe- g the pp;. e ° file, prior to the ,�.ec©asss±�enda3tia�r a�.ozs� tine ®ntiret of the a lica�nt's� fi public h►, ins. .;dtditional verbal or written testimony y . y also be p......ted resass�,tx •�duriatag the public hearing, The NVO also requests .. that approval of the associated minor land 1 Subject to the approval Of thin _ s 4 ion p i.�►`ion (SUB �3� �'AU.� Ilse j ... pP'�v�'' res�txa�ss�t. The intent in that the aubdivLsion id denied, there then state two parcela. While the City unci s tisata�ads that : y ., .. d not a justifiable �` ��aIBI�An '�.o ,a .. y pp reas�ota for the. a;,it.. to deny a reaaaa�snaable a�nd�3 Vitally rcvalble laassd eases bs� the ca e .. ��. 'C _. sego ®t. C►um to the ti'mi.ng of theses two aa~� lica�tionn®� than City' wild, . .. requiting recording of the lands a•af ositi n prior to then o ding Of the final n; ivi iou plat. BEARINGS I1Sl� r Lm>MS /671st I�Gs OFFICER G ' b 01 I t 93 -0004 WAIIIIII A 1ett ar was eesbaaitt s$d to the City March 17, 3.993 from the FriendFriends of Oak Park. Thies letter' recc aasnde that the following provis {!,ona be a Copt+ in the atii Ar % 7,1 this subtlivisiof request. The recotracuided provisions; are: Provrido a wetlands impact statement nt from an alternative source other than the (brit-eloper. STAFF The developer ehal,l be required to file svplication® With the Division of State Ada atWor the f Corps of for approval to modify the wetlands. �sg3saseaeacs� Provide wildlife iiapitat statement indicating a plan of how to sitiaintaiti the pr STAFF No separato wild1S fss s statement is�s z wi . c4 b , the City. Rathead ® this slash, tai impact s�stat moire ` s�!reasaesi as a portion of the wetland and habitat information provided in order to obtain the apps;'opriate State permits. Reduce the nurser of homes to meet the recur emled criteria STAFV See analy a3e under Section V. Horan located west of the Thus Daairy will have a buffer Of trees and open space. STAFF - The City Ce3prehensive Plan polioi a and City water quality theft e ordinances do allow the opt ss~iter�� buffer fasc3aity is two specific uesess. Ate recommended near the saOuthaast corner Of the site. This facility will provide a partial knitter between these uses along a portion of the Wiz$ ply lines. Provide a buffer of trete betwttn the development site to protebt wetlands and Create a buffer between posed baseball fields and potential - A 3S foot buffer around the psresr ha�s� STAFF « ;e of the Wetland is a Standard requirement. T is no cede • "tr ovisien to respire that the potential future baseball fields be buffered fry these proposed residence . Ste= drains to drain into tittering system Set up by USA prior to entering the wetlands. STAFF The Unified Sewerage Agcy has established, and the city ha: agreed to enforce (Resolution and order M: o. 91-47), Surface Rater Vianagetent Regulations respir the Construction of onradittl *hater quality fay !.4.lities or fees in., lied Of their ccanntrUctioaa. ti'ecti *n 7.10 of Resolution mid NO. 01.41 list three criteria fee reqUiriog a on -site' one of there the criteria areas e tb Site facility. . . it ieprarCticasdle air ineffective t cop ttdot li tl . See analys. .- .. . or s� ®3.]e n�a® _ �. xan®truct nd oar spit® fasbciv � � �. " is� in Section `� gar if determination t he res aiding the Cs3�t. . ® to accept a fee sass '1i� �f t LASttailation of noch a fa; 3 hue i' ..d4 sac® to be no Mere then 400 feet long. nano This APPlioatioe ree®tioes not pr ®poe a oi �d o-- ®ac for the pus c ot Peet s th3 temporary dead-end at the ea end of tite required to terminate With a temporary darn,= around. ...w istiaig streams vegetat.on...... ® pl,aciing ®tread Maintain aa�.l Le pigs. ST19►P ' - the State of g ors Divis�i ®n of Stet." Lands haS W AniNc8 orricsii - GAY - / sun 9,3 -no07 / SLR 93 -0004 the jurisdiction to ren►icswr- and apps ap Aicatione for tland:is modifications. fissplac st of wetlands reAuiiree either' on -ai,1e of off -site mitigation. The City of Tigard Enginezring iv ai will review ell drainage and laud form modificatir.:.s opo&ed On this► site. Eliminate alley saayssi (inlets) that are on `a . Seep hill tad wattled into bs►etlandL:, This pesos cafo4 issues for fixe and pedestrians. MAW? The 'centime of the proposed three •• ivrate streets ; are net wetland locations. The wetlands are located south of these stoma, and south of the iota which are to ba served by them. The proposed private streets, and a numb of lots, era, located within arena with greater than a 25 -0 rt lope. Approved grading plans shall be to gentineering Department standards and acceptable to the Tualatin n jJk ll Firm District. Limit number of trees that are cut. No fir trees over six inches in doter , ST The Community Dettelopment Code (Section 18.150) allows for trees to be removed as necessary to acceolimiddate streuaturac, streets, . ' i,tilee a and other, needed Or required : ' :ii s within the development proposed. The applicant may reetve those trees for which the dity has issued permits. Trees tomalley than six inches in diameter when n'eaaured four feet above grade are exempt from the City & e tree real permit pssss . The devo3 will aid Tina iaa ly the development of a trail from Cook ark to Tualatin Park. 8T1 - The City is not able to obligate icip tion for such an off-site improvement for this P Pa development application. The burden Vh h would need to be demonstrateA would be to show that the specifics need fnx the trail is a direct result of the creation of this specific subdivision. Regional participation may be requested through other ese. 8. Portland Coneral Electric and Northwest Natural. Gas have reviewed the proposal and have offered no commentu or objections. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. fag -meal iazssoer h un$tY ::D rat _ Vie. 1. The proposed eubdivieeiou ccsmplien with the use atasande de of the t are Y intended to be devel.o d mein le- �fam�.l: detaohesd di�1.13.ri�einitsft a4rnitted a te this tondo ThY e 46 lets ran i R 'lied bet 405 and 10, 060 ocintte feet are all intlet than tho rain . 3,050 , ospsias f 4 minimum "et Bice requirement of this +e. ill lotet ere ssubjeot t: the eetblink. sstaan w.. of the R -.12 Sone. dettiliande with thOite tita idarde will bps reVieltitil asn panes Of the Ibuilding as licall . .. .t pp � , on pr000sasai for hose. cats -acted e►ai ire+di:.. tiduasii lotto, The site pinn inelicatesss . opet, .� 4ek.® -motto one in the nortin v.. rat cornoe eatf the saute aee. than . ha'r in the northeast sterner. the pity contends that theto g ep ass seho a►id be i.ncatirp aratsd i to d and bedded par t ofd the aadi tidel9t lots HEhRIMGS ofilcigk - GRAY- / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 rather than be unmaintained , areas. This shall be redomminded as a condition of approval for this development. The applicant has indicated on page 3 -5 Of the preliminary Plat, the area of the site containing elopes agreater then ,, percent. grade. This is d "Tr shaped area which roughly covers s the portion of the site between the wetland butter and the proposed Rent .,. Drive. Prior to any Such on-site, the applitant shall aw►'b nit, ltd receive 045graval fora, such grading plans., fry the City of Tigard Rnginfeeriag raMpartment. All appli. F,atble City, st .a de shall be a Wetlands have bead isdontl,,2ied on the southern portion of the site. Northwest EttifiroScienceg Inc. has performed +a watlana delineation and preliminary mitigaaation, concept plan for the "site. The development of this site atil), require the filling of appro*iitately 0.15 acres. The mitigation plan cells fora wetland creation area of 0.2 acres and an enhancoment area of 0.2 acre*. The e i tigatien will take place on the southeast corner of the site. The identified wetlands aneAt the mitigaited wetlands are classified as : sensitive land areas under Red o)nt on and carder No 91 -47. This classification requires that an undisturbed Corridor be y °o which er a einPamum of 29 feet wide; measured horiaontaily from the defined boundimries of the tensi tine area. The appli cant hac defined the sensitive area and provided for this reqUired 25 . foot buffer At the time of .application for this development, the applicant 'l±k. not made application to the Comic of It.Vngineeze or the Division of State Lands. The applicant aho td be to required to apply and meet the requirements " of the Oregon Division of iSttAtc Lends and Army Corps of girgineern as they pertain to the Wetlands and their mitigation. The approval criteria for is fie*a ,tiosns i,tial sensit$M4 lands areas have been satisfied as noted below: The th', .,e propoa� l�i� farm alte�af�.aoaas� /d�eloent are Of the application of the + .nom required ettuldairdS in Order. to provide adequate csc i"s to the prt aoa$ed lots on this Site. • The agvliclotql develOprient pi e have attempted t and drainage area ether that ae toqtaired to tise the rae eel ant tivg,eauate *he suer iota Propoaa4 is less than that tatiittad. The prop= ee%isl lam 'Jot* ah lteratiorraaa /divaolt oteit will not r+ rsailt in erosions etteati metlieentationo ground inattibilktro Or othea ae% tee en oite or oftr*ait‘:6111dOto aye h tardy ate, shall to approved by the City Rng eetieg De d sat upon future revie'o. E gal n catiol Meatisiireal Ster, approved engineeri ag deeigane Shall be 'lobed for in ettch alalodificatione, EfflAkINgs onacza GRAYalattS SOD 93-0007 / Stell 93 -0004 riltolt 11 yl. net will : ' ' c The water flow capacity of the draif a Y will � decreased.. Plane, verifying thins standard shall be submitted to and 'approved byd tae 'City Engineering Department. d. The area where Vegetation is to be removed for such modifications will be i ga ed on-site according to an approved on -site mitigation plat as accepted by DSL. • The drainage way will be replaced by a storm drain of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow as approved the City of T3ard Engineering Department. • Required red state of Oregon pe mits have not been appa' ie3i for regarding the seed land fc n modification/development plans. This shall be a condition of approval for this develd®nt • Teaenn ght of the lots meet the basic solar access requirements • y Lei as specified in Cede Section 1s 88A4Q4C, 1 �,l1 ' (lots 2+-160 24'27 33 -35,, 38,► 42-45, and (13). The front lot line orientation' of these lots is Within 30 degrcees of true east-west. These lots also provide a minimal ioj b.eauth dimension of at least 90 Ze+et. The b Lance of the lotsaita not meet the ree :irementtl. Rots 46 and 47 daunt haves front. lot lines oriented Within 30, degreen of true eastat • The ba9.anoa tthe � e lack a ttg r�l fired 90' font , n h -south dis nsio n# sett of Ccae lets also lack the required front legit line orientation. The applicant's 'narrative States Oat protected aoler bdildi lines shall be applied to lots 1, 2b, 31 and 36 to the tavieioae allo in Section DD O.,. • therefore theft four lenta shall comply with these reqUirementa. Of the total numbs. of lots, Ted of the lots can doeisted as the standard d 20% exemption free these solar let regciirementa. The balance of these lots (sire lots) are accepted aataaf f as • pt ` nta tiro these standards as per See ttions is i�8 9.4cI I 1 t 1 sC. d ti . There is wetland a3Xea . located on e eoutB portion of this site Within which the appl i cant in proposing no development buia only a small swat of litigation. This *zetissd will rein in to ieteiace after this deOekOpMent iii Completed. In order to i tilisee the buildable portions of this its, and to coUti nthe desired reed petters i tit thin areas the , ll;lefted in ability to crate fully ®clear lotto without ant licant is sip ifLaently reed ding the total icav Of lots. .. fore® is 9 ®tee ��in lots be acecsan� eels 'that the bal.aaaaceae tot these' 40 lasts . .. . .it ,1 ..... EaItIQ{ acC 4°.f� the above e�cepte�i fret the solar access r refa rent ed ; d justmsnts to del�i9n ata°� e. s tan Site of .. .. 'eitivsi ®n c�s�al% Att. defile �� arson ®f the f 4 The j�roiaoaxee� s, , �}! dGd � �W (Ai�F30i ®l�ty' •. A�i... � r the .... � ; r 92 a ova is r ht f -ran and t uudevel opadale aadf tee Chan ea! 1 ofth® l rortLoaia of thin Site) Mppr cxim s� �iy s �e f eet (1.55 watiRptds Oftlettsiit F Ii551f gut 93 -0001 / am 93-0004 Ply 12 acres); the 7noise site Le approximately 11.12 acres. With a Initiesum lot size of 3.050 square feet per dwelling unit, ti is site yields an opportunity for 107 414.11ince units under the R-42 zoning doeignation. The applicant has proposed the creation of 48 single-family lots and therefore, complies with this standard. 5. Chapter i1 (Viaual Cleatante) requi..eaa that adequate Vicion be provided at all ,tztiad interseetions. Thin standard shall be satisfied by adherence tr.7,, the requirements regarding the iteijoit and placement of any future possible obstructions including a subdivieten ident4fiCatiOn 61.0111. Prior to the installation of any such sign, a sign permit from the Planning Department must be obtained. Tttw sign permit review and approval process will,' require a finding that the Aga will be consistent with the requireMents of Chapters ,,,21.102 (Vision Clearance) and 18.114 (Signe)* 6. Chapter 18.10e (Access) and section 111.1,fitzp6atat (Lot 'Vantage) are glatiefied lit that at least 25 feet of frentage is provided for all lots; including those served m private streets. Therefore. all prepOsed lots meet the required lot frontage widths an specified boy this code standard. 7. The applidant has provided a tree inventory for this site, but has not yet applied a tree re:Royal permit for this site as rewired by Sootier: ArWl...ggsiejlin (Tree Removal), TherefOrev prier tv the issuance of a tree removal permit, the applicant shall supply a map specifying the trees being requested for removal as they relate to: 1) public imeireverients infrantrUcture, and 2) buiAding envelopes. This information :shall identify the type and size of all trees on this site which are greater than alas inched I,J1 die:Meter relative to each tree removal permit application. 8. The proponed subdivision is Connittent with the subdiviSiOri approval atendarde of Chapter 18.M06lin (SUbdiviniona) bectUnes a • The prorcatts-d stabdiViaion Ocinplietii with the Comprehensive Plan ays dindi-Sigh Dent ity Reaidentiel density opportUnity for the site an well an With the plan policies, the regulations of the 18,42 none, and other applicable regtzlationitig b. The Ott:mot:6d hinge a the subdivision (Waverly ter-tat:est) in not duplicative of any ether plat tecottlIttl i‘st, thierangkott county; a. The propoeed public etreets prOVisfie for adtattito and Safe accede to the lets in thin priOd SubdiViSiOn. Thief prealintinery plata elite gtovidtat for a futtne eateitittii*A Of a proptimed istrao:t stisb abutting adjacent piettiettyiE RING G OFFICER GOT-Lhile „, *Alan SUS 93-0007 / SLIt 93-0004 • w y;; time City of Tigard Engineering Depa3 t It has reviettad the proposal and offers the following a „naiysis with regard to streets, sanita,ry sewers and storm draireaget . Streets: = Access to C'he site is gained fro SW 92nd Avenue which is �, � following minimum classified r collector has the standards (all distances are from centerline) t 30 feet of rigLt- �d aCG� a minor of -way, 20 feet of pavement, curb amt sidewalk. Existing cvaditites reflect 25 feet of right-of-way, 12 -14 a r,t of pavement, no comas or sidewalk. The aapplicc t is proposing, and should be raecpaired, to bring SW 92nd Avzsetent up to miniaman standards along the 50 foot frontage of the dr ewelez. sing to serve t aYnt with a local 'i�� applicant is pry he de�e1, met/west :street. Three private streets with "haussorheaada” ' ate also prop. f the Bite. The proposed to serve southern portion o applicant is viroposing, and should be required, to meet all local/private street eetaand nte a for such stsests o . t /wrest eL`eeat, the At the eastern terdaiana�as of they isscaal sae .. applicant Le pre posing to install a 20 foot Ade strip =tending to SW 85th Avenue. this improvement La entirely on property which t f/� lot 1000. This 20 foot wide strip will be �e .`t o•1: tax 14�t ZIDVNs dedicated and isProved for figs access aka vell as a bike /pedestrian path to SW S5th Avenue. S t.r Theze id an existing 3 inch public sanitary ewer r line ideated aloeng the southern property line to which the app2 is oSing to connect to serve this develop®ean has tom' p►�� as deal nt• a t n �.� of:T achy to &cct date thIt. C. St,,,,. o. , a. :a6aa ® s The applionnt aing ca collect tide etoga " aet: a� ,o3ae e�aat e pointa Vi tkn .xn the attibdiViSLOn iind direct it toward the steitianda. en haae eaesta�l slre . •,gad the dit � has �►e tTn�.i �.e�d Seacae hg � +fit y� Snrfa�► .ater agreed to enforce (ReeOltttien and Order Boa ` 91-47), . . M i ement Regulation® re iring the conetruceion of am —site water _� a .it...: faci:litie ox teen in lieu of their conatreot ..: Secti 1.1® tit Re3Olut .oe eed Order ro. 91-47 list threee i criteria for not r it .. quality - e►ne oS� the ®e three � ��, ateri.aa a�arre e..rng a on�ei't® lability. it _ or tle aaaaakeee it ; praa tioala or 446 "t'he ei,ta� 't ®� ap�tx or ® ®�: r .t ffective to cona,truct au on- ite fecilitf." the apptLcaa at hag regs®eated thy, t i to .04Le i be ini/Ofezd 1141660" of the e lect'? ®lop es. the Ea l neon ke4 iDepartteet be te d tte fole©, wiag rnncarne wi�h re �tc:ag *rater quality lability oaa this Site. '1RZ➢ *%S bFFt'I o GRAY-LEANS / 3 A!'AIRR SUB 43-0067 / tR 03-0004 PAGE :4 • .17.1r111111Moreimiw, i tu `°rte'^ �•- n'.�,_; The (*Way p1dce to install a fa! P!L Ii s downgitreast, . which is either on Ater elopes tgVdtater than 2' percen) ,;or in the wetlands buffer aver.. b►, If s fa;ic .lity. wars installed, that city teaotld be toquir;$*d to maintain ii‘t a Installed , such an area as deatiw+ .ti."' l abe ve would add .a ordinary reaintaance coat alnd Concern's. The r'ao f from all 48 lots' fe propOsed to be discharged into the existing wetl.aaA .. The effect that the phosphorus contained in the runoff will have upon they wetland sraa is of prinawy concern. The facility unless it van be demonstrated that the facility is either �. The city con:J r ruct uicune�eee��ryr or ,.aapos®ibleaw finds that die r -- y facility on this Mite Ls bath p raib1e and of a aerate.. �eal].t fac necema& °. The City finds that two options exist: obligation of this .deaeeloPsent proposar.]. Lo tc px^�."'y►id such a HEAR/ as OFFI le SOB 9:l -0007 / • Place thee facility to the South of loth 28 31. An ..R. aces old need to acc®aas roadway for a�l.;��ce be conetrue ted,. This roadway could be placed between ,3eta 44 and . 45 above the stars dral n. 111 3.6 option would necessitate the renovel of a lam ;.mac of mat kit C,edau , Alder and IPi e' trees The nece®eary grading would probably cause a greater en roac t 'into the wetlivid. 1) .. . tiro T ' facility in than location e��: �.e��aat 20 armor d daub hh tr d doper the Place t 21 a ®e�x �� o ��.® �ou►l loe® of one to throes! - ptoposed buileiilag -. == faolit y could be accessed through afil ant cexa*..a �" idatw the lodiIittcs The City reacnd� that tip fatality ity 21 and/Or 22. Tuns ion ' id creates a laaae, of lots 20, g, . :. Additionally, i a �i adjacent W ene].a:�ac>�ental impact: eagarding the a_f neaiee and € nt Thus e ,; id nt a let! 1d bo mitigated Lect of the a��o . axp�rilR, the futu�a� � e of xtt3s day uttill.r: t lotto foe a tesp is�q one or more of tDa®ece �c�a water a ttal ty faaciLity. , � � an ot�eit Therefore, the applicant aahoutld be required to install water quality facility to nerve thi adieieLOD. D. Wetland/4i: • tlan]a tavea been id ®rtifie9 ol -the so10thercn pottioai of the elate. .. fob a ; land Cali eeatiou and pt• rt n g Lion doxidatit plan fear` the sitaa The eleave1nt of this Site wig.' he f illin of approximate]. 0.15 acres • mitigation pined Cal le for a , land oreatioC attea of 0.2 stow® and a tenhantentent area of 0.2 accost all tO be done g \tLgated Arai 1aQnda arty b t The idelntif �.erd wetlans�, and the , . de* P.!!solution bind tad NO, 91- ci3Oe� ®if3.ae� assn ®ecaalt,.:iret area® u� G TAAIARE �... slin 930100 rasszt 15 ,.m • gy 47. The sensitive land area criteria requites that an Artatllet rbed buffer be provided which is at least a minimum of 25 feet ride, measured hox'izo; all. , from the a efiz d boauaajlariGE of the . sanative area. The applicant has defined the seneait ve area g n provided " or the 25 foot buffew as require,, At the time of applicrCion for this development proposal, the r application to the Corps of Engineers or the !Amin I f� State Lando, The applicant should be to resnired to apply and meet the requirements of the Oregon Division ion of State Lands Land Army Corps of Engineers as they pertain to the wu'et.lands and their mitigation. B. � rehen ®� � 3�lan� j101. Cis 1. The ;, **division is oor±ai etont with Policy 2.1.1 because notice o the apppliroa � ., . public . _ .. , `.' �. � an e, �o owners lion and th � +lic Negri xti n it j was providvd to the ;&��'i:iE Wstihood p►. _...._.i.�y okq of property win the rotif i � area site. �guts been elte®4 Tiga d Times which has advertised the ime and . , glace of fiAt €u public hearing g � o held on this a lioatior,. proposal is consistent with Policy 3.1.1 because evidence of the acceptance of a Dit* . <eion of State Iand04 watlands mitigation plan nhm , 1, lie rewired el% a Condition of approval. 1. 7 .x. grading and itilprCAL,X,ant plans shall be reviewed and accepted by the City of Ti a � sd z its* rivig Dep m t prior to the. Ps'raanl a of navy Site g trarmits. 3. In ordsr to oomply with Policy 4.2.10 d tun war an: to =quire th® developer prepare an as n i ensurit4 ,'3`+.Mx ,Dlta'3nce with erosion miatrol atandaaxd& for the 1!dialatin River Basin as part 02 the gra ling permit atjplication. The doveloper ohal1 construct an on -e i to pater quality fa lity BA required by , the Oregon Itivirdnmeratal (Natty Orxtet.l. nab= and USA reguItiOn$ This p 01100 with PoliOiea 7M12,, 7.3.1, and 4. '�H�,ia� a�ubE4i�°i•:= ion ' a" ®,��f�A�i. coo�l,�.� r' .4r.4• ee the ; apll.oant will, extend public met& and water ay team thie site and will prOvide for underground inaataakll4 »:tea of phone, elettritity0 aid cablO t, 4leviaion Line+. 5. the subdivision propoa sl complte with Poiia a all as 'i 0.1,63 p ` pe fir. r Street Within .._. tk� ro eracl eart�neieag► �� e�nta to th .: _- a t. . see a� and •,• djacent to the _„ an f fi. ci t street . {� thin area. The Creation of s!+1 p and �A ii. ii++� �" d A9t Dri a a,..d! Thom, Lloyd aana ? tent Coaau°•t+a Will be required to be impteved 000dic*eent vith tb city of Tigard etaandard f for public los7al and private atrE to r®r pa tivtl.y. INGS 0l0 Fi _ GRAY ..LAMS WAYMIRE am 93 -000i 0 b4 PAGE 1. • -,r.a�ti it:litCLUSION AND i t =' ND9 s I The. planning Division r ;.�clude® that the proposed aaabdLvL®LO , will pr to the '� � 1,iiicaas�� c�®triss�ntal nor general welfare o1 the City autd will not be mm[ l iriicilou zo ` A - properties prided that development i.s ich occur after thwn d i®ion omp r applicable loca7,0 federal In reoogniti�a o� the findings staff re p nds 7PR . aaf Subdivision prepegial 93-1,1O7, and Sensitive ► Lands ,Review SLR 93-0004 for tbo propased Walter ly M+et testis subdivision subject to the conditions which follow. ALL 'CONDITIONS SHALL DD SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY A$SIMED PRIOR TO RECORDIM THit FINAL T'LAT WITH WASEINGTOM COUNTY. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIyia76, THE STAMP CO iT T eat M1 Iv itEctanentimu alhilTl ®NS IS sCN33I$ Dily Ira IN TEE EdrOSNNERIMG DMPRRTMIE01T• ' 039-47471. A Segnsitiv* dada To.tm.rmit Shall 1.4e2critained by the ,Nrsplicant Cana the DS Artily Corpse of Engineers and. Division of States Lands ;r (Authoritg'ss tlecti 4040 clean Water 16 ,r and OAS 541.605 and f.41.096). A dOpy of the scsanLt Shall ltie providbd to thm City Engineering Department by the vpp.i.cact. Tc applicant 0bal1, provide, a& a rinis um, a ?5 feat buffe along the dreaina r a y ' u, and along the boundegry o the i etlend arenas which * tete the rel- I- rresents of Section 6.080 of FAO No. 9147 e rpo gat® the won =EMS The p 1. i>a�.na as . and stimi set o®rnere of he Sit® into the ad j e�c t i2 the north t 4 iota. 61107 t'0NtI7A. a "Rota P ro , Planning DttritteLittent The 4`ppltca t shall '/ requited to pro ri wide an oiioasasite wt P i& ty t. .. d under the gaidelinee ®i Unified Sanaerage Aget.c' �aclYi�y saes er�t�li, ®tae ,►a Sit .ution and Order Rio. 91«47. Price to this Subdivision plat being recorded *with 4aeh ,naa toua qty the Tenet tine aad ju®tmeft and Minor Land PartitiOn0 referred to in the. (City 1,Tigtitta Planning records asp MIS 93,4002 and MP 93 ..O�b03, res t fly, i Shell C►ther be a droved and �reoeaarcPed ►:c'tor to *it , cord d sales ra., us►t ®ol "'�y wiri tb t1 a SuladiViei.on p1r.at.. 6. P�d:ticxas r igaut� f..a ay µ �ed to the valid alo* the SW 92nd W 92nd avenue fxon g ® faorea s therigzf-ibia4+ay to '30 feet fry® a~�ss tes�lirite The deecrLpti ©n Shall be ti to tea_' ietine2 sight =.alp y oc ntorl3:sto �. StattiVatti hall etr;eet 3,mprcx'eaa� ®, inditiaing ditnetete iilAttimaki . , • sanitary sure stoma dreti, t, • ee sh . asphaltic c ®at��' e tre��.�.ghte� and undls*xgrous.ad ®� ureai.li.�m� rill: be ia�tta�ll�1 ai.osr� the SW 92nd Avenue frontage . Irrop. y 9a� nt..tra�acta+d . � so�re�.leESa�,� eb,al�l 1x3 deli eed and co to ? i1 Ar collector etxeset et tdatde &Ad Shall conform to the ',ti. nt adadjacent ro�edrn�n..ssa or: to an alb. ntt~ a„ gin Rnaianseaari. ag Depaa tent =1=04, oFFt GRYOLA J$ 93- 000I / St 93-0004 v improvements, including traffic control devices, Pull width street i�� mailbox clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway aprons, curbs, aephaltic were, drainage, streetlighte, and . � sanitary storm drab uodera aas roe�lnt� utilities shall be installed a�.�thin the seabdivf�,saiarn, concrete. �,av/�n er � � to loca9l]. s�t'��`' Improvements shall b,�a d�- •si�yreed era' �.,mnstruct stands rds$s. -�"�� access from the eastern The applicant Rheaa.�. provided for eme.a. ye ll' terninue of the local. street to Ste S:a 4 Avenue. This accese ehall include d dicatiofl of right-of-way, bike/pedaa s3trien a ees„ and seem type y control which will prevent motor vehiclee tram u of path, except for emergency vehicles. The access control shall ets�.agpp p for i�;�trict. Two be approved by the Tualatin Valley Fire D (2) sets of detailed public SFr cement plane rejt profile construction drawings shall he submitted for prelini.- y rev3ew to the `7) sets of appar: t drawings wags + (1) �� a �:F ®asio�l. Engineering t i dDepartment. ine Seven estimate, all prepay by ional itemized .,"On9`�.t'e��. -rte cost a ,�� C�� Engi er, shall be submitted for final review and approval Division ee drawings required by the silding • lrattasui �"3:® in addition toe any �,►se an abou .d only include sus relevant to public improvements. ra;)l plan �: hells be provided an part of the �i'� im ove gent draw plan shell conform to "Ere :Ilion Conte el �;�lane An aerod ri,:s� �.on TecIu icar Guidance handbook, teseember 1939. The aigplieant shall provide an oia site �� .��, .� water quality facility establi Bled under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Ageacy 5140eitstio a the fee in -lid for that and Order O. 9i�_ 47. The applicant, may �' r . st f on of the site which count be directed through the water quality fatality,: then fin el determination as to the amount of .,l f - if any, shall be lest bliahed by the City Engineer. 13. Storn drainage ' ' . Shall be p i ded aS p ef the lAu !, b t plans. Calculations and a topogeaphic asap' o' ' the settee drainage basin s ®rai.ca an ® . _ __ ,+ shell �:� ..eat oar full shell be provided as a supple i nt to the public imp, r nt �ca�are�xat plaaa ®. �aaaceraat� � lm�cati3�iara and capacity o�� e�e®e�lotnt oil the aserrti�eaS�l+� ... a�sest . at. ne�d, and future lines shall be addres . 14. A g radin g plan tsaal� �t ovring both he Wasting a d peopo cortonr ®and rypira? finished floor elev.itiofe ea dt iOt; inelUding el actions at 4 diifersunt c ere of the fuser plan tied to the tea saf e.ya.tiv"n�,. z» t Jnfa an r1hCi6aTB Can th® pudic isCprcrv'.tivant plaaus The' apps... ' of ,a igerd M state of Oregon Struct tt .. ape-cit./14 . A � t trt�� lc7l be awex'ae that the fit. . .. .. - chapter. Irad in i plan ohali CoMply all requir ente of this r er3�;�h pic3.oa to the plat being ittcotded with Wass bioagton Wanty the appliroa O .t �. ..... �, ... »� t$Le� last 1e�C°��1► .. f ehal3. prawide a �.�3® percent ., icaant ma hs p ._ 1 rfote lance as�aaaraa a or e cos�cs�:�eati AA aa,�:tear�rat3�ve tlxo aY�p' y � � the City .,q ,. ,,. hic rovemehts have been accepted y -A 1.�". 'of a a�,� af�tes the and has hooted the a pgpt nd,.` ria�a �iai3:$idta";�►a��te HEARIEGS OFFICER - Gld -LAMB SUB 93-000'14 / SLR 93 -0C'04 $ya The applicant, shall make an appointment foe a pre -construction meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of the ', blic improvement plans hat before ntarting wasr% on the site. The applicant, the applicant • s engineer ar di contrsr. tor a ' 11 be eaquired to attend this meeting prior to receiving the approved plans and penults. Construction of' the proposed a+abli.c improvements and issuance of Building Permits shall net cc hence until after the Engineering Department hail reviewed and approved the lie imprenvemente plans, a street opening 'Termit or acnstaructieen compliance agreements has bee executed, ax auition of a developer-engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees The applicant eita31 obtein a 'Joint Permit" from the City of Tigard. This permit shaft meet the requirements of the EPDSS and Tualatin Basin Erosion Control Program. A tree survey identifying the type and size of all trees on ' the site which are over 6 inches in aliameter shall be submitted. '�;oni,e surrey bull also specify the e° trees which are proposed for renal in ccareiae w,ithtbe coneat tue , i t i.ic_ ire av a A tree, removal permit shall be applied for and approved by the Planning Division prior to the 1 w ao ®al of any such trees on -site. eTAFF CONTACTs Victor Adore i, Plianning D ,vision. 2193 APPLICANT SHOULD BE REQunum To COMP= MMTD THE romosind =tam= MGR !r ISSUANCE OP ,BUILDING PERMITS: 21. A tree survey identifying the type end size of all tams on the ,site . which are over 6 inches in diameter shall be eamitted. Thin surrey shall. specify those trees which are proposed for resoval with„ ,.at action of »eesnce A tree raal permit shall be applied for and approved by the Planning bi.Visnion prior to Itse arAtitivaa of any such treed cos: -site. STAPP C IOTA Tz Victor Monrie ;l ing } Divisiianm SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHALL 811 MID ONLY Iii' TEE FIB PLAT 1S SUBMITTED ytTHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS C2 T EECT'i eE !ATE or THIS DECISION. Prepared By: Approved 1J Ron Pomeroy .i ds ietant Memo Dick Hewitt Seaier P Date FIFE SUB 93-0007 / SLR 93-00;r3 Richard Eewersdarff; Senior Planner. (;.`ty of Tigard 13125 S. W. Hal. 11vd o Tigard, OR 923 Re: your letter of August 31, 1993 (Your file $ub93 -U007 ) Dear Mr. Bewersdorfi' Thank. you for Your letter regarding poss b;! e historical or archaeological interest of the Lamb- Greg subdivision Property. ' We i mediatehy contacted'. Mr. Gilson ,-) the State Historic. Preservation Oftico, to whom you had referred uo Unfortunatel , he 'bras u,z b1e to give a us � � any more substantive detail of and alleged location of interest, as the Phone caller was anonYmot mss, and wOcald not divulge a name. He off er' -d to send u ~3 a ' list of names of experienced people who might be able to make an examination o:P the site, so We Will pursue that when the information arrives. In the meaxiti ; ?' stied the lower owner, Mr. OraY, if he had not ic i any su9lh evidence in the tntial excavation work b.o sub >st �.-� �: has done On his property, which : s located directly the sc uth, axed he has advised us he has not, We have also advised the contractor and the surveyors of t i3 information, zo they are sensit1ve to the problem. We will medi: tely advise You if anything olsr develop Ioberta a'a; ire Waverl y Construction Go R B03 er4 5505 Kch °moth Waymire 318g SK Country ' View Lane Wilsonville OR 97070 ' fa ire: T116 C!ty of Tigard received a call on August 30, 1993 from tiand Gibson of . the State fl storit Preservation Office 37860, e t . 232) . He indicated that he received, a telephone call ailegiitig that the area for which you received preliminary 3ubdiviti on approval for subdivision (SUB 93 0007 /ST R 93-0004) day be archaeological site. tl ds and human bones on the �� way told of findings of arrd��e . indicated �� have ��/ an � haeo�,o�s� h�at disturbance . o Site. Mt. felon�4 and that y nay want to ,� a. class � investigate the site prior to ground disturbance to protect your interests I have listed Mr. Gibson ° a phone number for your use Si $e ely, Richard H. Bewersdorff senior Planner 13125 SW Nab , OR 97223 003) 4139,4171 TOD (503) r: E CEIVED PLANNING TUALATIN VALLEY fi & RESCUE SEP 2 3 199 AND BEAVER `O14 HRE DEPARTMENT 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive e PD. Ro 415:0 Beaverton, OR 97076 • (503) 526 -2469 m MX 526 -2538 September 21, 1993 Dennis D. Smith Northwest Civil Design, Inc. 9130 S.W. Pioneer Court, Suite F Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 e : The Park subdivision (Previously known as rav e lY Estates) Tigard, Oregon Dear Denni S r` This is a Fire and Life safety Plan Review and l :s based '�°h.9..� _ or iii Fire ` Code (a�'&''�') and on the 1991 editions of the Uniform those sections Y of the UnifO m Building Code (tJBC) and e�s axld.�ng uniform �eerhan�c� ¢ ` . ��;, focal, r.rd�,nanr� k, ' a.� Cod ,8 �%,�1C � e CtI. f].... al � ,r'e.�, e~r`e C�. the fire depar^tme, t, and of t c o d regulations. Plan and profile of Co ok Pi r,`os Y fi. re access ) cannot be approved at this time. T""fir Pww�'►�bJ1dJ�.1�`e�ss� ®��o follow be corrected or revised and ,plan said correct'.ons. 1. department access roadways shall not be less � Fire de�ar than 20 feet in Width. .. Please ;revise the e�'nes �rency ac of . access roadway l2adirg from the end Cook Parkway to Southwest 97th making it not leas than 20 feet of unobstructed driving Surface,, The __ may all weather vin �u (� q � `{ onT) ""' (� urface �'e ! r�f.�''�%e.L �I 3� lV a i,ii k ro shall su t not than 12,E 500 p i nds whedll shall �xt not less Pp load. r � 4�xres at a ends af this emergency access can either be swinging gates or single point telease cable. o;ked, locks shall be Barr`ic:a,aes .. bollards and similar Knox Box, � 1r devices are not acceptable At each end of shad emergency access roadway, no _ parking sIgns be provided at each entry corner to the adcess 1 'r/iIi,' rs;$ b r r,�di�ke Deteetoni siit� av tik Dennis D. , September 2a 199 Page 2 roadtfay. P' parking sigis .shy ll., state: °!. Vo "" PAP'K: _N+ ", "Tow AWAY gONE" o E . NE" "OOPS 98.810-012",, T'hey shall be pOsted no closer 'Athare 4 feet to the ground ' nor higher than 6 fast ,; 'br,ve the ground. UPC. 10.201(1) ' Tai ».:inr radii for fire department acoae . O0,dsfas shall not be less than 25 Feet for inside. 1;f�sl e radii of hammerheads shall comply with this' ✓,rig, require, nt as well as ent� andes o the harfimerheads off the main street system , Where d parking on pVate hammerheads;, Yvil,i obstruct a 20 foot driving �r �r�ace no Parking signs shall he installed. N6 Parking signs shall state the sir Arse as in item #2 Pr2d shall be placed often enough to piGLI ' s �'�La�'� aef�l b of any further assir If I can be �' �'tance t6 you, phase feel Zree to contact me at 526 - -2502 Sincerely ". ,fie'•' October 20, 1993 Kenneth L Waymire Waverly Construction Co:, Inc . 31835 SW Lour r,, View Lane Wilsonville, OR 97070 Re SUB 93 7/SLR 93-0004 ""The Park" Dear Mr. Waymire: CFY OF TK?ARDa OREGON . your letter 0 In response to our Ie�� of October Seth, and our discussion East night, following la what would propose in order that you may move forward on your project,, if you agree, please sign at the bottom and return one copy, 'sects may remove only those trees and vegetation necessary to install the erosion control y y _� measures: You are committing to installing the full erosion control measures within hours of utarting the work. This allows you to get mechanical equipment in to Install the erosion cOntroll instead of doing It manually. You agee to provide financial security In the mount of $5,000.00 that will be available and maintenance of the erosion control features should yr: to the City for construction . - not Install the ercolon control protection within 48 hours; or install it in en unacceptable manner: security . . . upon submittal and approval of the full ihie� .earl deposit will be reimbursed x,.. the construction irr►prov . ¢ the erosion control performance bon for the �e ernents �n��a the... Mer sures are installed,: you may proceed on with the rest of the necessary tree removal and grading, as per your approved plans. ,i will . .. ore you ��e in°a , work, howeverd you wil4 update your 'grading plan with David Scott, Vie# Blinding i'dcial. YOu will also need to have submitted and approved a tree protection plan to protect those trees that will not be removed: To satisfy the criteria of the Development Code Section #18,160,30 A.S. I will accept your proposal adjustment, You will plant 100 or more trees either 3" in diameter r ®pose with � a minor a u� .� eht. and p ,. Approximately on the other or �� tel! at the time of lantin - e he . ue end th .. . if will b�� d ®c�duo evergreen. B the time W issue Sc �� ► of the building permits, 40% of the one had will b�� e �p t,l tree a will .� . installed: By the time we riaue 40 b' laden ,1 off the trues ®Ili a� been Ins _ .. y .. - may - . „ , � permits; _ � . ., . wail be instaP ed_ O: , if you wish, you may d nanclelly ,1ecure the remaining treea to be pi►rdted at any time. 13125 Svc Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-41711 TDD (503) 684- 2772 s Page 2 To start the following must be protldsd: you plan on protecting trees that will not remov , and have It �o� us how y p p approved by Victor Adonri: �ubrr�y �� a sority check for with a Inter stating purpose. : See 2a David Scott to update your grading permit Sign this letter° 6. 1. t us Knows when you pia;►; t on staqing. _ a inspection corm t o Thom f the En lnaarpn q Department) er Cell an t I for � . � .�� tree. the eo osIon control Is In place, and prior to comnrr efl fg the rest the removal and rout grading. of this lamer :tie , the Stop Work Order 'i d by Ken'Schri®ndi on Octol r 8r 1 By way Is rescindedn u have any uestion% please e . at 171. Thank you for your cof� pe tlOfl. If yo y q Sin r rely° Ed slurp gm/VT*00 ,W ' Randy Wnc"ey %Gary Aifspn J: Dick Bewa sdcnf/ VIctOr Adonr oft Waverly Construction Co. Inc. 3183G S, W. Country 'Vie Lane Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 503 694 $505 rn 8d 1'41 00 .Dire #;tor Comer unity Development City of Tigard 13125 Z. W. Hail Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 October 19, 1993 Tie: Tree Cutting Permit it93 0034; top Work Order issued October 1993 bear Mr. lr1ri .r'phy r yew �. dtreeti� This r th� evening satisfy 7�� k�� criteria of �ou� ordinance �13iai�.�i� A�� f� �s per your verbal e presently narned "The Park" sub divisiOn Nub 93-0007) will have planted, at the the of the finish construction of the housing unit ;, 100 i,r more trees eithAr 6" '741 diameter or 2111 tall at the Yime of planting. Tht plantings will be approxiMately laws.: deciduous and half evergreen. 1 ec is at the time, ut it the t not yet been planned, it is not possible to allocate trees �ecau5e cii�, housing units haat� irne fifty percent of the housing units have occupancy to individual o aus permits, forty percent of tne trees will have been inso fed. 3.' the time is acckpa acy permits have been issued, 1013 trees will have been installed. cc: Clay P. Malqurry Attotn y At La Co: Drake Butsciet Portland Metro Horncbuilders From: Waverly Construclion Co. inc, 31e35 0, W. Country %OW Lane Wilson e, Oregon 97070 603 694 5506 • 'o f.;1 Murphy D rect or Community Development City of Tigexd 13125 S. W. Bail Blvd. Tigard, C:ir,.agon 97223 October 19, 1993 ,e: Tree Cutting Permit 93 Oo�4', Stop Work Order � � 6, 1993.. der a�stxed �;ct�ber Dear Mr. MINOR!): This letter to satisfy the criteria of your ordinance #10.155,30 A. 6, at per` your verbal dftection on the of October '�Yie Par�99dt��lnrt (Sub 9 10, 3 -0007) wi l have: ?lanted, at the time nits 100 o The p�_sen4ly? named of the finish coristr�ac�.ien of the pious u , or niore trees either 6" in diameter or 20' at . n i. deciduous and half evergreen of p��:��:r�. 'fie plantings � be approximately half dec�e� time . - . ie toy allocate �`�c'ees y, the o y�y � units �ve .not yet been planned, ft not possid,. l�ecatas� the taqu�uig individual iota at this time, but. by the time fifty e �sta�ed,t� a h� � d ��ii+�i'la �has�e perx�it5,f °r perce{nt �nf the trees �vlll��d ' �,+ � '�.. � I been issued, 00 traes wig have be �"" � �1 o. then . Waymire fic Daly P. iviciviurry 1,tton+ap At Law -004 drake B0t5ch Pond Metro iomebatilders p eo,p i t o con t aG i t 4 . • • Bon d l ar, t..''''00,61,1•,,I..., i. 63 n -3 b ' . BFI ,4h lA !..4 1. Tony and Carol ,n �r l :� 0 J 68.4 - 1231:'' '" ` ]©avid dnd ";Tammy itis X520 -319 k � 'u u Soh t and Barbara .P re•s4ent,zn 620 •8815 . . �.�. „13111 and Beverly Al l'e.r t << 62'4 -6409 have 1 d Kr: s Noma S20 8t148 �p.' ' mmett. and t dl Whitaker 6 • 9, 8 '..57Q iii J hn Dud l eY Richard and Sue Kasson 639-1148. ette7A0-41za 6 20 9771 361 n and Sa i l ey Th©ma 630+ 364$' t nand Candi Mitchell ✓ 4-2561 Lean and 3aok aC r Oue 10 '"684,-54$ $ !Bob and Lynda lea thammer 639 -9772 Fritz. and Mary Kramer 6 4- 143,9'' ”: and Sally t.,ynch Pat Ogle Gail Babcock Jornny Wat errrran Dietz Masora and ,Mary, Meinin er 639 4577 639 -14Z 590'70 598-8825 ' 598 -9337 -,r +.. y. ...... Arremonvas AT LAW Sam. Ftamtniasigi PLARA Onus 19.W. Ccliwtor.alA STSRAIhro4 PcinirLANI% 0?..-AdicoN 9113$3 cdhlidchliiii and prig ilifordifition which iv lateadcd only (dr int individual riecipierai nahlud. Univas you arc Aich id rocipluat Or tilt tiathoriud again livu arc proltNtes1 (writ iltading, copying, diatributing othltsteir4 divaciditialing each Igor . million. yod reed Ihi o crror. 11112103 notirit ondur ar14 PCIUtn Ibis eltrAniurlitIalion via rind ciao ilaw, hu ed op 104 us nuts ...c1.1116:11,111.2, DATE; "11,): l'El..117:(:Ort° NO FROM: NC1 „OSILIR ES". Oto.tober Sent: Nuother of Pages (inclutling this cliver): there is a pr()Illetri with this tritrist'nesrit)n r yt)I1 need ft.irt,aer ifirorrtiatk)n, please cttll thc ATTORNEYS AT LAW 435 BENI FRANICLIN PLAZA ONE S.W. COLUMBIA STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97258 Richard H. Bewersdorff Senior PlEvier City of Tigard 13124 S.W. Kalil Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Kenneth Viraymire Park Subdivision SUB 934007 "Stop Work Order" Dr Mr. Bewersdorff: I have called you three times and written you one letter, all without response. Apparently, you visited with my client yesterday, Thursday, October 14, and advised him that you are arranging a meeting some time on Monday, October 18, to be attended by "Friends of Cook Park," and wish to have my client present, after which, on Tuesday, you will rescind your "Step Work Order" on the park subdivision, I am at a loss to determine what purpose is being served by having Mr. Waymire and his wife attend the meeting. Waverly Construction has fully complied with all requirements of the Qty ordinance and holds a validly issued tree cutting permit. I will be involved in depositions this afternoon so I urge you to call me before 12A1 p.m. this date, to wt a time for this meeting and for you to confirm the City's position. GPM:dm :11:. • = _ '4 'IT% ;'; . 4,3,!.4. C NSTRUC1.,gON INC, P.O. BOX 230639 TI3ARp, OREGON 97281 503. 500 -3939 FAX 590.7215 Kenneth Waymire October 13, ;9_, �'1►9:r. i.��iRsvt� a...� Waverly Construction Co. 31835 S.W Country View Lane Wilsonville, OR 9070 Bid Quote: Waverly Estates Subdivision Tigard, Oregon sopa Civil d plans dated 9/13/93. �.��.- Wised on Northwest ��,��1 �c�cc revised Quantity Description Price T'tal 1. LS Mobilization & i�e>tobilixation $3,000.00 $$�p000 1° 2. LS Erosion Control.,, ,500.00' (No seeding or Hydro U ��45 0001,0 � g � �1 3. LS Clearing & Grubbing, Within Grading Limits $45,000.0 ,. . (Tree. Protection by Others) r , 00.00 $19500.00 a . 1 � Traffic Control, cP�eci� �► Sawcut �1 r $750,00 $750.00 5, 1 ea Street End Barricade 6. LS Mass Excavation it Embhnk tent Using dative Site Soil to Grade Site per Plan Sheet 50 IncludPg Stripping tt1th Excess Disposal $90,500.000 $900500.00 Offsite 7. LS Pine Grade Street Subgrades $3,540.00 $3,540:00 p 3 a. 3560 if Stand-Up Curd, $5.00 $21 60.00 9.* 1700 cy 11 " -0 Base Rock] 7" oa pth $14.00 �'23,800.00' X30 cy 3 Tor Rock 2" depth $19.00 $10,070 10. �'w...r 11. 6150 sy 31" Class "B" A,C. (2 Lifts)* $7.00 $43,050.00 *Energy Price Adjustment applicable after 1 yr. r 12. 14 ea Tigard Street Street $750.00 $10,500.00 13. 2500 if Power Trenching $2.00 $5 000.00 14. 140 if Power Crossings $6.00 i840.00 15. 2 ea vaults Storm i� $� 0. � $9,00000 16. 4501! 12 PVC m p 17 15" Pipe OO 6 ea Manhole Adaptors $7,560.00 315 if 15 PVC Stara Pr e 24.00 15� �. p 300 00 3 tea Manholes $1,650,00 $4,950.00 14. R . 0 20. 10 ea $1,160.00 30.00�_ � $$�,000��1. 100 cy Class 200 Rip Pap a Cut Inlets LS y Testing & Mandrill `Pull 1 800.00 22, 1205 if a i g $ , $1,800.00 2,�. ** 12 " Class 52 fl water Main 20.00 $24,1.00,00 20* 440 if 4" Class 52 BI Mater Main N16.00 $70040.00 Waverly Construction Co. October 13, 1993 Page 25. LS 4" Fittings $975.00 $975.00 26. LS 8" Fittings $2,3'5.00 $2,325.00 21. 4 ea 8" Cate Valves $550.00 $2,200.00 28. 3 ea 6" Gate Valves $450.00 $1,350.00 29. 3 ea 4" Gate Valves $350.00 $1,050.00 30. 10 ea 1910 Valve Boxes $50.00 $500.00 31. 2 ea Mueller Fire Hydrat's $1,500.00 $3,000.00 32. 4 ea Blow -oils $550.00 $2,200.00 33. 1 ea 3 Ft. Water Sampling Station $500.00 $590.00 34. 3 ea 6" ` x 10' aJ Spools $250.00 $750.00 35. LS Testing & Chlorination $1,000.00 $1,000.00 36. 2405 Uf 8" PVC Sanitary SeWer Pipe $23.00 $55,315,00 37. 1570 if E " PVC Laterals $20.00 $31,400.00 30. is Plugs, Manhole Adapters, Tees & Markets $2,000,09 $2,000.00 39. 13. el Manholes $1,800.11 $23,400.00 40. 3 ea Slope Anchors $500.00 $1,500.00 41. LS Testing, Vacua, Testing & TV Work $3,000.00 $3,000,.00 TOTS QUOTE $464,225.00 *Notes Loose yards by Truck Measure. **Mote: Water gervices from main by City. NoteN Ciaaficatimia Layout, compaction testing, permits, development fees or bonds are by others. 2. Foundation repairs below subgraaes are not included. 3. Rock excavation or dewaterang over normal water pump is not include. 4. Wet weather construction would be at extra cost, u. No seeding, plants, landscaping �Ca�,�.�.w�d -..to be installed bv bdaalders g, p wetland mitigation measures, 7 Plan changes would be at a liable unit prices, unless differing site conditions prevail. ply '� 8. if we install 2" A. C'. lift y . . top lift one base la,,�'t only, and Owner installs the 1W' A. �' year lam afier home construction), deduct $16,725.00- -or net total of 447,5(. Thank you, L. S. HENRIKSEN CONSTRUCTION, INC, �A: PE ale OCT-11— ° 93 MN L1.43, ID BARRY P MCMURRY TEL.`NO :'5 3 -228 -7 i49C5 Pei CO22404", o tuelf ; Arronsarrn AI 4,35 Os 6. iii;++ ALiPi Pt Qln1$.W. Cp:i,m4..,6iNICt3T Pensradiryos, 01‘11612N Tsmoolrrfo (tso3) 238.74436 4,Enci t��iet c;;;;;; sohfid�► i a16 and rriViicgon Inforiotninn which is intchddd only for the individual recipient nimed. Uniaa9 you are such mimed retipicttt or Urn authoriued ugcor. you are prohibited tam reeding, coityhug, distributing or'othewdige dilsseminssing such infor motion. II' you r cci,°ud this coa9tnauniention in woo, phase notify the sc odkr hemodiuiciy awl return this cr►n enonIcaiion Vin fires digs 111 C1t! �t° ( ��1°"�f �•�. ie 1111 ' vaa ��m +�r.1� • Tot '1131,13COPY NO,: 12, FROM: Garry P. Mdelurry [ Nc WOSURESb MESSAGE: `I`im Sent Wt. Number of Pages ( fiid udin j this Cover) gfthierat lk h1em with this trtii:rti';ltn or tt1 need further inform itkrn please call the above iium rr� • OCT-11—'93 MON 11:42.. ID:qARRY P. MCMURRY.• TELE1.1.103-23-740,1 . • #96 PM?. Ttwornoms (603) 206'65 a 5 • •`,.'•• AleircomatIAAT LAW 435 Boa. Pivolvtium Pa...meA Own S.W. COLNAIVIA SISIMMB1 FteaTuttlak Osaattom 972S% October 11, 1993 LEGIBILITY STRIP x Richard H. Bewersdorff Senior Pl ,rper City of Tigl,rd 13174 S.W. Hall Bolgevarcl Tigard, OR 91223 Re: Kenneth Waymire Perk Subdivision SUB 934407 "Stop Work Order" Trizisocainiza (SW) 228•144313 Dea Mr. Bewersdorff: This writer has been retained by Kenneth Waymire to work with him and the City of Tigard to remove the Stop Work Oder issued on October 6, 1993, pursuant to your letter of September 29, 1993. This is a mater of some urgency due to the fact that inclement weather may result in a halt of the project for nine months at a cost to Mr. Waymire of in CXCOB13 of S175, The purpose of this letter is to reiterate my call to you made Monday, October 11, at 9;42 to arrange for a meeting in your office to be attended by the Planning Department, Building Department, and Engineering Department to resolve the issues raised iii your letter of September Nth. It my understanding that a tree remer/al plan has been submitted to Me City of showing the sewer and waste water lines, preliminarily AU Vtlitg , I Further, our engineer (NOrthwest Civil Design, Inc.) has physically marked all the trees to be removed, in addition proposed erosion control fencing is shown on drawing #9219520, Obviously we await undergrowth clearing, before, placement of the erosion control fence, We believe that we haVe fully complied with ea departments of the City and fear unfounded concerns of unaffected persons will unreasotably delay this development, 1, .1 4 . , '4."` ' MfflefflignaliffnlERAMEMINEINCIallareORKEPRONEWNAINGSMIIIWZIWPW ld IXT- i -- 93 MON 11:42 VOGARRY P MC pill ?CAW/OM:et I . would appreciate your zObias MC and atr s time so at vie com met t move ftrward :n grading, Cie let..ennetb WaymIrs TELEPHONE (503) 228-6515 Ito c At- TOitNE103 AT LAW 435 BENI FRANkr, N PLAZA ONR S.W. COLUMBIA STREET PORT " "'LAND, OREGON 072:58 October 11, 1993 A FAwCSLMILE AND REGULAR MAIL Richard if Bewersdorff Senior Planner City of Tigard 13124 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Kenneth Waymire Park Subdivision SUB 93 -0007 "Stop VVork Order" RECEIVED PLANNING OCT 1. S 1993 TELECOPIER (503) 228 -7468 Dear Mr. Bewersdorff: This writer has been retained by Kenneth Waymire to work with him and the City of Tigard to remove the Stop Work Order issued on October 6, 1993, pursuant to your letter of September 29, 1993. This is a matter of some urgency due to the fact that inclement weather may result in a halt of the project for nine months at a cost to Mr, Waymire of in excess of $175,000. The purpose of this letter is to reiterate my call to you made Monday, October 11, at 9.42 to al-range for a meeting in your office to be attended by the Planning Department, Building Department, and Engineering Department to resolve the issues raised in your letter of September 29th. It is my understanding that a tree removal plan has been submitted to the City o¢ Tigard showing the sewer and waste water p Y � .. �,iy p. Ong'' -e ri ter lines, reh�rnna��u, annroved b� the �� i erin Deaartment. Further, our engineer. (Northwest Civil Design; inc.) has physically marked all the trees to be removed. In addition, proposed erosion control fencing is shown on drawing #9219520. Obviously we await undergrowth clearing before placement of the eroc on control fence. We believe that we have fully complied with all departments of the City mid fear unfounded concerns of unaffected persons will unreasonably delay this development, Richard H. Beworsdorfi October 11, 1993 Page 2 1 p i your calling m 0,nd arranging a time so that we can meet an ®uld �, ��ea.�a�e move forward on grading. GPM :dm cc: Kenneth Waymire VIOM P t t TIOATAIINVALLEYFIRE&RESCIAGT121993 AND BEAVERTONFIPEDEPARTMENT 4755 S.W. Griffith eve • P.O . BoX 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 m (503) 526 -2469 • FAX 526 --2538 October 5, 1993 Rick Walker, AICP Palmer, Groth & Pietka 110 S.W. YarnL ;1 Street, Suite 2 00 Portland, Oregon 97204 Re: The Park Subdivision (Previously known as Waverly Estates,i r, t I r Dear Mr. Walker: A 'Y' , concern with respect to where The Fire ��.�tract has no c . the streets i 4 this subdivision lie. The Fire District does ha4[, requirements that where 20 or more d r� a dead end street, that a dwelling units exist 1 • , - sea�secondary ndsecondary access be provided. The Firc i+JIstr.e,.et encourages that this access be On a through, fully develops: public street, however, have accepted emergency access roadways . All streets or emergency access roadways need to comply with all provisions of the ;.. Uniform Fire Code �p , � y the M ate of �regon Fire�arshaland theFre�Dis trct. /B g If plans need to be revised regarding The Paaric Subdivision, plans need to be submitted to this office for review and approval pr ur to any construction. If N ; alternate materials and methods are offered in lieu of full requirements of the fire code, this office will need a written offer that shows requirements are egval to or greater than those called out for in the Uniform Fire Code. The request shall be submitted to this OD office and will be ruled upon in a timely znahner. If :T' can be of any further assistance to You, Please feel free to contact me at 526 -2502 Sincerely, cc: Dennis D. Smith, CiVil � y smth, Northwest Cvil De g Inc. b City of Tigard Planning epartment "n''orkbag" SrAoke Detectors eve LivcS rig .... ., Kenneth 'N'a; ; .rep 7105 SW '" %? View Lane W'ilsonVi l , OR 97070 . r ! W ..ire The City of Tigard received a call on Aufplat 30$ 19 3 from Leland Gibson of the State Historic Prey rva at. ti n Office n call alleging , e the area for which you received pr liminary subdivision approval for subdivision. (SUB - $ � 93-0004) archaeological Site. He was told of f n sings ...: arrowheads d. a, bon the site. Mr. Gibson indicated that disturbance cif /ndkan gr yes is class C felony and that you may want to have the site p �io ' to ground disturbance to investigate prOtect your interests I listed Mr. Gibson s phone nuudmr ` for your use. inc ely, r-- Alchard H. Bewersdorff 1. 6nior" Planner 1 125 Sou Hail FAO, ligardi OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD 0003) 6B4 2772 IMENEIUMERMIRIWWW&Z.V.I..,tiedia. BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER, FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Ken Waymilice for approval ) EINALQEDFA, of a preliminary plat for a 48-lot land division and ) SUB 93-0007 sensitive lands review for land east of SW 92nd Ave. ) SLR 93-0004 north eti Cook Park in the City of Tigard, Ore en ) (Waverly Estates) EQQ The beatings officer adopts and incorporates herein the findings of the Tigard Ccreanunity Development Department Staff Report dated Mardi 23, 1993 (the "Staff Report"), including the summary, findings about the site and surroundings, applicable approval 3tandardst, NPO and agency comments, and evaluation of the request, except to the extent expressly modified herein. 1. The hearings officer conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application tm March 30, 1993. In response to a request from a witness, the record war held open 7 days (until 5 p.m. on April 6, 1993). A record of the testimony and evidence is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceeding), and Exhibit C (Mitten Testimony). 2. The following testimony and ev e MCC was offered at or after the hearing while the record was held tipen. The relevance and plaits of these arguments are addressed in the Discussion section of this decision. a. City Planner Dick Bewersdorff summaaiz,ed the Staff Report and responded to questions. He opined that filling of the 'huinageway in the west portion of the site ir permitted by the Code if it complies with applicable approval criteria. However, he-conceded that not filling the draina,geway„ such as by relocating the wad to the north age of the site, would more affirmatively comply with caul t approval criteria. b. Gerald Cash, the Realtor fir the site, and Tim Roth, a contractor and developer, testified in favor if the proposal, citing, among other things, the amount of planning that has gone it to t le proposal, the increased tax revenue from the site if it is developed, and general impressions about the merits of the proposal. c. Doug Smithey, a professional wildlife biologist, testified about the hnpacts the development would have on wetland, forest and upland habitats. Ha argued the proposal will I warmly affect habitat without mitigating those impacts, He submitted a ; written statement describing in more detail what those effects are. le proposed the following cianditiona: delete lots 44, 45, 47 and 48; move the south lines of lots 38 and 39 to the 135-foot contain- line; delete or rt ince the size of lots 21 and 22; and provide certain Ideris of vegetation and limited-access improvenaents in the oven space. e. Mary Meininger testified against the proposal on behalf of Friends of Cook Park. She untie the following main arguments: there should be a "wetland impact statement"; a buffer of Ines and a fence should be provided between the proposed lots and the wetlands tc the south and between the site and the Thomas dairy farm to the east, on- site Water quality facilities should be prois,ided; the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (TV-FRD) shouk ! review and approve the temportuy turn-around; public review of grading - plans should be required for areas sloped 'time than 25% before the preliminary plat is INEMMINEWBIRUCIE.ffsmiainiaximta, approved permits from COB and ODSla should be requited; a tree s rvey should be requited and section 18150 P seavati ) should be enforced d.y; sanitary sewer lines should not cross the wetland; the stream should be allowed to flow naturally into the wets, and a note on the face of the plat should notify ra�esp Live purchaser of the 8 re erate of a d farm joining the s site. She submitted two mitten statements ,, t p° received by the Qty on April 5. She also submittal a March 3fld pril one m Sue der to Bill Parks (ODSL) raising qpe; t ons about letter fat April 2 6) the sroposad f. ttrney Ma tik mottle testified against the proposal on behalf of Sohn . and Say 'ho who own tite d y farm east of the site. Wiry Cottle stibnnittee written the following arguments: (1) The parposah dares not comply with section 18 84.040, because . statements dated March 30 and April 2 in support of ha testimony. In saavvratry, he made tbet development will result in erosion, based on statements in the application that erosion eonttol :measure s :c will be used. If an erosion ience need to be pled at the bottom of the itlope on the site, then it is neasonable to conclh& that erosion will occurs That violates the amroval criteria: That impact cannot be mitigatsx1 to comply with 1khe criteria. (2) Tim to aposal does not comply faith section 18.84.040 B and C, because the application does not include substantial evidence that it will not cause an "other 4 life p pertye" He argued the application does not adverse e�. off sYte effect ®r hazard to life ®r ao show how ,nrnuch storm water will be discharged from the site alter development as compared to before development. If the volume or rate of rn& i ff is greater, then there would be an adiie se impact (i.e., flooding) on the Thomas dairy fanrm. (3) The proposal does not comply with. section 18.84.040, because the record does not include substantial evndence defining the elxsting quality of the wets south of the site; therefore, e, there is no way to evaluate whether the Hand form alterations will adversely ae, ieact the quality of the wetland over time. (4) The propose.• does not comply 'With sec io ' 18,84.040(C)(3), 1 because the applicant will fill and pipe the drainagewayd in the at eest portion of the site; s the ca of the d na ewa . therefore, the applicant necessarily d �Y - g y • to . 0 if the with section 1� �� 4 (5) The the a o move,. was road north to avoid or applicant installed a bridge Mar g ,� reduce the need for filling (6) The proposal does not comply section 18.120, because of with lack of an adequate buffer between the prop sod �d ai n and existing adjoining fay use The subdnvisir* is within 5 feet of the bare on the dairy f • Agricultural activity ;n the barn generally ,.gins at 4 a.m. daily, and odor, flies, dust and noise will lead to conflicts adjo gna.ng residents. He �� proposed that a storm water facility should i 75-buffer with natnraltyvegetation. he ,cor,end��i a 7 'To denims buffer the site from the farm, �p drainage swab and. 8-foot h� $n fence located between the proposed lots and the farm, site . should be placed along the common boundary of the site and farm., that ;d all trees renaovt from the site be replanted in the buffer. (7) A =file steady shouid be requ t g Bob Sellers argued that the fire access mad i to 85th Avenue will enable more pedestrian and vehicular access to adjoining properties„ increasing the potential for Page 2 ileakitigs Officer decision SUB A P- 00071SL' 93.0004 (w'arrerty Estates') trespass vandalism ltie also argued the tree preservation ordinance is not well- enforced, and should not be relied on to toet existing Yege A h. Dan Quello argued that the subdivision will have a significant adverse effect on the character of the area, particularly w'heu viewed frOrn Cook Park. He proposed that the City buy the site for expansion of C i . Park. i. Although they declind to a �an a ative preseetation of ther e t proposal„ ea and Ken Waymire responded to questions by the hearings officer about R yrn� sly �. impacts of and alternatives to the p vosal. Ms. ways argued the subdivision should be approveA as proposed. Mr. Waymire testified that he V developing only 7.5 acmes of the 12 -acre site, that 60% of the trees on the site are reined, that the density is far less �u permitted (Lee up to 140 dwelling units), and that changing the street plan to avoid g the dralaageway in the west portion of the site was too costly because of the loss of lots.. j. Dan Mitchell testified with concerns about traffic sttieed on 92nd Avenue. k. B.C. Lamb submitted a letter dated April 6, 1993 to fora Pi;rnetiy sic) 'in which he argues in favor of approval of the subdi'vislen. He summanzcd the history of planning for the developreent of the site and adjoining and lie argued that the wetland conservation work done to date and the plans for the site are benefit. He argued that 71% of the trees and 90% of the cedar grove on the site will be retained. 1. Erna Gilbertson subunittol a letter dated April 5 in whi ti she argued the to should not be developed, a traffic study should irs prepared, and a foot buffer and 10 -foot f ewe should be provided between the site and the farm. m. After the healing, sae applicant submitted applications he has filed with ge permits as jM USCOE and t�l�S�. for clred and rill ", eim� .�- �..ana[ed with the sensitive lands review. piscussioN he general, the hearings officer Staff R contains adequate finds that Section V of the rdings addressing applicable approval criteria, and those findings are supported by o I auk few factual conflicts in this case. °Fire substantial evidence � the record. There conflict is in applying the facts to the applicable law. The Staff Report and oral . g application. the follov,.. ° and written testimony raise specific issues regarding the In kang discussion, the hearings officer a eases those issues that. are or may be relevant. d _ a g the t officer recognizes the work that has g i le' into the plans for this 1. The hearings offnc . _ Given the difficu It natural conditions on the site and adjoining land uses, more work is needed to prepare plans to develop this site than for many other sites. The amount of sate Div - . P P Y gone site is not relevant to the subdivision or sensitive work that has c+ne uita planning for the sib .... i relevant is whether the results of that work show the development potential tax revenue re the development of the lands review What i� A,. will comply with applicable c�iae�id. The po.. .. .. el to b + subdivision or sensitive lands review. The hearings site is n� t r+e_ev€unt, tai die �rexia for the s h$ want to or should purchase the , lend for officer caunnot consider whether the City g p' ptu poses, One issue in this case is whether the applicant should several require/J. to 2 �n r A, recommend tine applicant vi area° quality enhancement fi ilitt City staff, , on-site storm ,,. LL ... „ � and the g � Agency Y . _....._ • be required to prc� Unified Sewerage A ens. �'� S) , � , 'de such feattnr�e - See the p g condition of appnm al 4 in the Staff Such features �aare squired b and and Order 91-47. They are cyons».ient Report. such y Page 3 - -- Hearings Officer decision SOB ,3- 0907 /SL,R 93.0004 (Waverly h`state. ) • with and maybe necessary to comply with sections 18,84.040(C)(2) and 18.164.1M and Policy 3.4.2. The preliminary plat does not show such features, and the applicant did not agree to provide them. a. �/ The hearings officer finds that the applicant r.,qui rd to provide a t q • J •• 4 () • in worm water , uaht facility on-site, unless �d; development 1 qualifies for a payment lieu; (2) the lack of such a facility does not result in erosion, stream sedimentation or adverse habitat effects; and (3) ad eq uate off- site str► water facilities exist or will b e provided. b. The hearings officer finds the applicant did not bear the burden of proof that the development qualifies for a payment in lieu of on -sae storm water quality facilities. The applicant also did not show that the amount of sediment transported doff -site by star,,na Water without such a facility will remain the same. rasa,c fences proposed south of the lots said at scattered points along the tow of the slope during construction will strap some r,.. nt, but were not shown to do so completely or effectively over tine. Based on the soils and slopes on the site and the amount of disruption to natural conditions that will result flow development, the hearings officer finds that the absence of water quality eatdrainage to section 18. 84.040(C)(2). The applicant also failed to show that downstream v►alc�. viola facilities will provide adequate way quality t atwwnt if an on -site facility is not provied. Therefore, the hearings officer finds °.' att the absence of on -site water quality features would violate section 18.164.100. 'f r: arefore, the applicant should be required to provide such a facility on -site. co The hearings officer further finds that the stoma water quality facility should be located outside of the wetland buffer so that the facility and its maintenance does not conflict with the wetland. It should be accessible to County inaintenance nce vehicles. The facility and access to and around the facility should be dedicated to the City so that the City can maintain the facility after any initial maintenance period for which the applicant is responsible. (1) If the facility can be located in whole or part along the east edge of the site (e.g., on lots 2 1 north of the R g proposed wetlands mitigation area) so that it pr vides a buffer between the, existing farm and the dwellings without compromiaing the primary .ty watt feature,then should be I there. i t should ben located tofmin�t e $ potential i acts h as by smin __ ; Ong removal of vegetation and grading. P �, (2) There is maple . . ' wi with a 42-inch inch diameter on lot 2, beset �, a on the tree nn^ t©ay. e :.salve as a visual amenity, it should be Because �f its sza�; and valve . pre etved if p cticable even if the water cjuality facility is situated on that lot. A qualified ca arberist or or -ittitlalent should participate in the design of the faraity as accessary to te determine whether it is practicable and, if it is practicable, should recommend mend measures to preserve the tree. Condition of approval 4 should be amended accordingly. d. The applicant can modify the p l. miulary plan to provide a , at om water r to quality facility. The Public Nikaics Director can evaluate the facility plan (after requesting ° -� it ionrl information or consulting with USA and other as n ess and determine p applicable . standards, J eirm. 'necr,�n practice. ri vat mfa fad lira ecnv stated above, and good . tc� whether it complies we g p i. _:. p fatality may require a n additional sensitive lauds review. Public notice and an oppoortunl the facility plan skald `ty to comment on bo rb ded if - . required by law. Condition approval 4 should p, req . y ` , �p fall be amended accordanglty. Page 4 d 'earings Ojjker decision SOB 93- 0007ISL;R 930004 (Matti)) Estates) 3. A second issue is whether the application should be amended to include a traffic study, vwetlands impact statement, or wildlife impact statement or a tree survey. Several witnesses argued in favor of such measures. The e Staff Report does not recommend a traffic study. Conditions of approval 20 and 21 of the Staff Report require tree survey and compliance with the tree preservation o dinar re in two phases: public improvements and building construction. a. The finds that t City Code does not require a traffic studyy, wetl tr impact statement, hearings w wildlife t statement se., The applicant must vide infatuation otrnation about the impacts on wetland and wildlife habitat o respond to section 18.84 and policy 3.4.r and has to provkle traffic information to respond to policy 8.1.1. Although more information and a more active role by the applicant at the hearing would have enhanced the applicants ability to bear the burden of proof, the hearings off cer finds there is sufficient substantial evidence in the reand to address these standards and policies. b. The applicant has provided a survey of trees with a diameter of 6 inches or more showhig their size and species and their relationship to proposed lot lines, grading, fill; and other fe t res of the development. See sheets 2 and 5 of the oversized s exhibits accompanying the application-, Tl ei fore, the application is not inc plete for failure to provide this information. The planning director can determine whether removal of any identified tree complies lies with section 18.150 laafese streets and utilities are built and lois are rough-guided. Conditions of approval compliance with that section in two ph � cvaJ unctio� wi review building permit t or proposed public facilities, the planning director decides what trees can be removed for those facilities and related grading. Typically in conjunction with review of a building permit application for each lot, .. the director decides what trees can be removed for homes and related features. Condition of approval 14 requires a grading plan. g not administer and enforce section (1) It was argued the City. does no 18.150 effectively, although substantial evidence was not introduced to sustain that argument, and the argument was disputed by witnesses and City staff. The hearing; officer assumes the City does and v1,1 continue to administer and enforce that section. (a) Some of the criteria in that section are clear and objective, but most involve a factual or legal judgment. Some of the cL1 a in that section are . • discretion, whether tree val is wa nted ` to otherwise uttiliz the applicant's property in an =sons.° .Rs manner"). Reasonable people can disagree about viietheei removal of a tree complies with such a discetionat standard. Public notice may be warn ted when administering su °h'sta ::'curds. Arlo red structures to be relocated or lane l;• 150 does not authorize the director to require R grading or yard areas • the number or significance of toes to be removed. In this aseoin particular, where be modified to . p their s form a signitxcant view men Cook Park, minimizing removal of trees from the site . , t P the Staff R... y , . The hearin .gs Policy 3 4.: was rr�t listed � �_., officer finds � ` � listed by t Report as an appeal standard 18.160.060(A)(1). f n • , Foe le relevant to r ew of the; subdivision applicatgcba under section that it na m racy 3.4.2 provides as follows Pre shaiila •ty ` (a)Cplrott fish and �,�ldlife habitat along strew car�i�rrs that areas of standing frees and nnatearal vegetation along and l wir by naan*�gmg the rnpaila�; inabitat and centre ng erasnor��ati�al drainage courses and waterways be manta , : i t o the maximum extent possible : Page S Hearings Officer decision SUB 93- 'XJ07ISLR 93 -0004 (Waverly &ate& L4 4) • • goal can be achieved partially through will reduce the visual pact of the vrc�,ect. Such a oaf � section 18.84 and policy 3.4.2. (c) The applicant has not applied ' for tree removal pmts in project Although such applications are likely to follow approval of cotton with the l�J � G preliminary plat, the hearings officer does not have jurisdiction over future tree permit applications and cannot prejudge them, (2) Conditions 21, and 22 do not expressly address tree removal when lots are rough graded (e.g., as shown 011 sheot5 fihe oversized exhibits) and do not expressly palate to the grading plan req-iiiied in condition 14., The conditions should be am ended to clearly require the "public impmven nt phase. of the tree permit review to include trees to be removed for rough grading by the applicant .. P filled. with the 18.150, �a (3) Because lot purchasers may not be aware f section • condition should be added 'acquiring the face of the plat or documents p and referred to in the deeds • for the property to advise purchasers that wtam larger 6 inches in diameter at breast height cannot be removed without comply g n or its amendments: 4, There was concern about the emergency access road to 85t) Avenue and the temporary tuna.- around at the east end of proposed Kent Drive. a. Future street extensions are addressed in section 18.164.030(F). An applicant is acquired to extend a street to the edge of a site where necessary to give a "l's to adjoining lands. The future extension of this street may be necessary to serve adjoinikag land. I'henlore, it should extend to the property line as proposed: b. The hearings officer was unable to fiend where the Development s p y proposed in this expressly vides for temporary tin- a�uncls or fire access roads such they my be provided for in separate design standards. They are consistent with policy 8.1.1 and may be authorized ptnsuant to the Fire Code. They -are warranted to ensure emergency vehicles have access to and am turn amid on the site. c: Condition of approval 9 of the Staff Report rewires the applicant to vide an emergency access mad toAvenue, Z nclxding ata1 right of way, bicycie/�destriau access„ and a gate or bollards to prevent non-emergency vehicle access. The access ss contnal is to be subject to review by the TVFRD: The ,...onditions of approval do not • turn-around on Kent Drive. Ti4ey should be amended to of ex ssl require a temporary y not terminate in a dead end until it is extended east develops. DeSi n of the turn - around should be subject to review by TVFR do �. , so that the toad adjoining land to ensure it will accommodate emergency vehicles. d. To prevent the emergency road from providing easy access t fence jo adjoining private prrppexty, the applicant should be required to install a minimum 6 foo extent it does not exist already adjoining the north and south sides of the emergency road: 5. A fourth issue is whether the application complies with section 18.84.015(C) �:.... federal ... agencies _ before �rtalcan That section deleg pp authority wetlands. rtes approval al authors to state and f a enci�5 re It requires the applicant to obtain applicable federal and state permits g A filling of wetlands: pp ro " l Staff Report requires such permits. The 1 of the comply with these sions. Section: l .84.015(0) does not require spuan of those permits before appmval of the preliminary plan. The applicant has t : a applied for permits to USCOE and`ODSL, USCOE indicatea� that the proposed i ►g is Page ! 93- OUayargngs Officer devisors. SLR 93-0004 (Waverly Estates) !�9 • under l y to be allowed. a nationwide permit once ODEQ certifies the project does not violate water qtaality s ndazIs. See lei of March 17,1y993 from Dale Haslem to Dennis Smith. ODSIL indicates compensatory mid ; :tionn will be required. See letter of Mr rch 26 from Waverly n The plan identifies laud rime and includes plan for development of such a mitigation area Code requites no before the preliminary plan can be apved. 6. A es relate to whether the application for the land form alations on lands sl mow than g % and in draina ewaY_.. s comply l with section 18.64.040(R) and (C), respectively a• To minimize site disturbances, ie 1u c the potential for off ito transport of sediment, maintain flood carrying capacity, and avoid other pote ntial adverse on- and - h applicant provide a buffer betwe n the delineated edge of the oaf f site ei€fi��ts. the a %cant shod yr wetland and proposed lot lines. Condition of apps 2 in the Stae Report requires a 25- foot buffer, consistent with recommendations of USA and sevetal witnesses. The preliminary plat includes a 25 -foot wetlands buffer north of the wetlands and proposed mitigation area 00 the site. Therefore, the preliminary plan complies with this conditxcn and, to this extent, with sections 18.84.040(B)(I) and (C)(1)• (1) The is a dispute about whether the wetlands delineation provided by the applicant is cc t. There is no substantial evidence nn the record. to rebut that delineation. Distrust of evidence intmduced by an applicant in general is not sufficient to discredit that evidence. The hearings s officer finds the delineation is substantial ivaidence. (2) Thee is an issue whether the buffer is large enough to mi limi site disturbances. It was argued that the larger the buffer, the less potential for human activity that would affect the wetland. The buffer can be c to include much of the steeply sloped common open apace south of the lots without reducing the number of lots or significantly affecting marketability. Moving the south edge of lots 38 and 39 fay north co the pace or buffer to include meal substantial trees. Te Staff Report did ®t directly r address issue: (a) The hearings officer concludes that the buffer, per se, should not be irquired to be enlarged because expert testimony shows it is adequate. (b) However, to enhance the water quality and habitat values of the common open space under policy 3 4.2,10 n amize sue disturbance and other on- and of site effects and to better protect the buffer area, the hearings oft cer finds: (i) Access, (level opme. t and tree removal is the common open space should be restricted, This minimizes disturbance of the steep haside and the vegetation on it and preserves the existing natural resource values of the wetland as much as possible. p bSpecific restrictions are discussed more in findings below. (ii) The sot O south edge of lots 38 and 39 ,�ho�d be moved, north at least d feet north of wetland. r�.�1� subst2�t�a��es transition area between the lets and p tees j g ; j.. from development effects. (3) These is an issue whether the buffer will be managed to mithn1 Le site udisturbances. The City ty c ou p acge r e title to or a conservation ser vation +ement over the common open space and/or buffer/wetland area to manage it or have some say in its management over time. The Staff Report did not address this issue. The beatings officer Page 7 liearbags ()friar decision 93- 0001/SLR 93- 0004 (Waved), des) ADINIMIC • declines to mandate City ownership of the cow open space and/or buffer/wetland trams. C.;ettalially the City can choose to acquire it or to accept its dedication However, City ownership of interests is not necessary to protect the resource values associated with the site to the extent posshblf b. The Staff Report does not expressly require the applicant to fence or restrict access to the wetland and wetland buffer. USA and others recommended such measures, because all-but-limited public access to the wetlands and buffer would conflict with habitat values. (1) The heanngs officer agues the applicant should be required to � potential significant u i ;e effects from too much public access. This is necessary to estt habitat pursuant to Policy 3.4.2 and to minimize protect the wetland and the buffer p disturbances pursuant sections 18.84.03)(1) and (C)(1)• site idistur ]� (2) There are a variety of suggestions in the record for such measures. The hearings officer funds that, at a minimum, the applicant should install ninths= six -foot high fence at the north edge of required wetland buffer or further north. If the applicant does not install the fence at the north edge of the common open space, then the applicant should be required to post signs identifying the edge of the common open space and prohibiting development, clearing, grading, filling, or tree i novel sea unless apl-tuv by the planning director. Only unpaved pedestrian-oriented pathways Y i shotiikl be permitted south of the fence, with access ►ta, ss to the wetland at relatively few p if any Details regarding � fence, potential pedestrian walkways south of the fence can be delegated to t �p g e far site development review and approval. A c'o dbn to this effect is necessary. c. Mr. Cottle argues the =cord is inadequate to comply with Rection 18.84.040(B) and (C), because it does not contain a factual analysis of the existing wetland south of the site; development cannot be evaluated. However the hearings officer finds that the record adequate without a factual analysis of y the existing wetland, provided the record shows that the proposed landfonn alterations will not change the impact of the site on the wetland. The hearings officer concludes the proposed .landform alterations, with the exception of the filling of the drainageway in the west portion of the site, will not change the impact of the site on the wetland, based on the following find rings (1) In i this case, the wetlands on the site are delineated„ They are to be pn°serve A cxt pt the drainageway at the west edge of the she Therefore, with that exception, developed • way that piion4 wetlands on the site will not be filled or otherwise develo ed in a • 1riC `,�, ..... r ., .. ... , • • g direct. .�fec the wetlands to the south. The hearings officer addresses the of the drainageway later in this discussion. (2) A storm water quality facility will collect and treat run -off so m that pollutants will not enter the wetland to the south. (3) A minimum 25-foot buffer is jorovided between the wetlands and the lots to the north. This area be pieseived There._, is additional won open ace between the buffer and p es to the north that can enhance the effectiveness of the .. buffer a tection for the wetlands, provided development .. does not occur in that area and trees b,er as Pollutants that escape the stow water quality system will be .� ed filtered there press out of runoff before they enter the wetlands on the site acid further filtered by those wttldnds before they enter i A y wetlands south of the area. buffer also keeps humans ter the awe The away from the wetlands. To achieve the: beneficial water quality effects described here, a P a g e 8 Heat gs Officer decdsiOM SUB 93- 00071ST R 93-04 (Waverly &trees condition is vvarranted prohibiting development in the Opal space except for pedestrian walkways approved by the planning director pursuant to site development diseased n is waif roh.i . common open space unless a tree is prohibit removal of trees from the co danger the tree may fall on existing or proposed structures or interfere with utility services. d. Mr. Cottle argues the lardforin alteration cannot comply with sections 18.84.040 0)(2) )(2) and (C)(2), affirmative finding cannot be made that izmci: ng because an a�dve fin ve etation from or land will not cause erosion. However, he presents no i , or for his construction of the Code. legislative story p1 (1) The hearings officer disagiees with the way Mr. Cottle construes those sections. Rather than prohibiting all erosion, those sections prohibit erosion or other effect ifijiMaradISCONSALSOMADis, Erosion is reasonably likely from any development, especially one affecting a drairiageway or land sloped more than 25%. It would be illogical for the City Council to adopt an approval l criteria that sr of be. fulfilled. To construe the sectots as argued by Mr. Cottle would prevent approval y . sensitive lands review. That is contrary to the way the sections be been construed since their adoption. The hearings officer construes those sections to require the applicant to if occur either will not or is not reasonably likely to or show that erosion that could that, if it does occur, it will be mitigated so that erosion does not have short or long term adverse on- or off-site effects. application includes a preliminary erosion (2) In this case, the a p' � pre ar, y • Additional be used p e fences, .straw ales, and other sed��ent barrse� w� control ian t<�a� shows falbri to prevent s pent from entering • the wetland or being carried ofi it. t standards are • provided for erosion control. See sheet 8 (Erosion ) die . � .•.. will ., are oversized drawings accompanying the application. If the erosion control measures used, erosion will not occur or where it does occur, eroded soil. toll before it affected replanted vegetation enters the wetland buffer, and lands affec by erosion will liar with that will prevent it from occurring in the future. +.. •. pp . . 1 .. requires . (3) Condittgn of a f vsew and Staff Report n�vai 1oef� � .al �f the applicant to submit an erosion control plan or pp p . final plat. Although more details about erosion control measures to be used and their let- by-lot location would enhance the applicant's ability to be the burden of proof regarding the hearings officer finds the application includes sufficient information to erosion show what an erosion control ply will contain and that a mote detailed plan can be prepared and approved by the City. e. Mr. Cottl argues application o.. comply ... i ns ear es the does not �tla sections i.. is volume of water to be 1.8.g4.�a(3)(� ;) and (C)(2), because it does not �uantify the vol discharged from the site. If more water is discharges; it could flood the Tho farm. g officer concedes the record does not contain of water discharged (l) 'l�he hearings of�fi .. _ e roc atcons elbows. g .., : ._ � e the site be�fo � and after c�acul ° `c� the volume � from fh development. Such calculations are required by condition of appprova .of the Staff pcsrt. In the absence of such calculations, the issue is to whether low hearings officer can �e .. cause hands downstream propel cowhide the landform alterations will not eau (2) hearings officer concludes fain; iandfoi n alterations will not s to downstream property ...... due to increased runoi�,f volume or rate, because: cause hazards z (a) The storm drainage system v l be design d to a accommodate antyacipated flows based on detailed calculations and subject to City engineer Hearings � tea. decision SUB 3�� Ski . (Waver1 Estates) • review. Therefore, the subdivision will be served by a drainage System that complies with City standards. Such a systei n wi1Tt eonsideir upstream flows and dowistatrun constraints and flood potential. Pursuant to to won 18.164.100(►+), if the City finds that the subdivision will generate flows ha excess of the capacity downs , then the final plat ppro i ags officer assures, based on these sections, the City will cannot be approved. The i� -�� not approve a plan that a=rould increase off -site storm water cliieharge. (b) The telatively large common open space area, buffer, and wetland provide land within which storm water can percolate. Tees on the site will continue to absorb substantial surface watts flows after development .The wetland to the south has been modified and enlarged, increasing its capacity" to contain storm water runoff from during ° . without increasing os -sites flooding outside of the fa the site dunr� peak conditi�ans ��th wetlands: Storm water from the developed areas of the she ME be collected and can be detained as necessary to prevent off -site flows from exceeding redevelopment races or volumes. The applicant is required to submit to a technical r •;•-sew process by which such judgments are made by people avith expertise in such matter (c) Mr. Cottle's unrebutted testimony is thaa any increased runoff from the site will cause off-site flooding. Assuming ng that testimony is correct, then no increase in off-site runoff rates or volumes should be allowed unless du ; ap plicant demonstrates it will not increase the potential for downstream flooding. Condition of approval 12 should be amended accordingly: E Mr. Cottle argues that filling the drainageway in the west portion of the site necessarily decreases its capacity, contrary to section 18.84e040(C)(3) However, the hearings officer finds that section 18.84.040(C)(3) is ambiguous. It does not state clearly h . what is meant by the term "water flow capacity of the drainageway." (1) Any filling of a drainageway necessarily reduces the capacity of the drainageway. It would be illogical for the City Council to adopt an approval criteria that cannot be fulfilled. To construe the section as gut by Mr. Cottle would prevent approval of any sensitive lands review involving filling of a drainageway. That is contrary to the way the section has been construed since its adoption. The hearings officer construes this section to require the applicant to show that the capacity p.. of drains ewa will not be reduced to less than the reasonably expected capacity nees for the drainageway and to show that it will continue to function as a drainage feature for the affected area to the extent that function is not fulfilled by other features. That is the way the section has been construe in the past, and it is reasonable to construe it that way, because. it relates the carrying capacity of the drainage system to the actual floe and demands on the system. of the drainageway g will be served natural a e channel with a pipeline within engineered filly Storm by replacing the g l� Pe drains will direct pipeline. T rd includes the size and wade of the . .sect watch to the The record pip... a sufficient .. pip is 12. adequate. pipeline. It does not include details su : c� show the of approval fl 12 Th . However, such calculations will be provided to fulfill at is sufficient to comply with section 18.84.040(C)(3). g: Mr Cottle argues the proposed filling of the draitnageway in the west e that filling is not necessary. , ection 18: 4w040(C)(1 ), becans pc�rtZOn of the site violates s : d;sni�l of condiaoned to ilia: a tent.. I3e Therefore, the sensitive lands review should noted that a bridge e could extend over the drainageway, preserving it largely intact, or the tn;oes could be moved to the north i eel e of the site where little if any road and associated u .... "� ° option .... g .. : r +' z g d. that vin tion with City staff filling would be needemm l��e hearings s officer raised the "'north road ty and the applicant during the hearing. The staff agreed that mo g the mad north of the Page 10 -- Hearings 0 cer decision 93.0007/SLR 93 -0004 (Waverly Estates) • drainageway would reduce tttc impacts of associated filling. The applicant argued it would be too costly to lose lots that road would cross. (1) This issue is one of the most difficult of the case, because it is not clear what the law intends. Requiring • g ' , of lots in �ls such a change wall reduce the number the subdivision by up to 4 lots, depending on what other changes are made. Section 18.84 does 110t suggest such malts are intended to follow from sensitive lands review. Sections 18.84 .P40(C) only authorizes the director to approve or approve with conditions sensitive lands ,review applications. Decal is not authorized. Neither are. conditions that effectively etegate part of the development assocu tod with the landform alteration. The standard prohibits a greater impact than "that required for the use." Therefore, the hearings officer construes 18,14.040(C) to assume that the proposed development will be undertaken, and to consider whether it is being under en y that minimizes site disturbances. (7) �' � The issue also is difficult, because them appears to be shared view authority for the posed filling. The City delegates responsibility to the Carps and ODSL to decide whether to allow the drainageway to be filled a • a wetland, but reserves that responsibility pursuant to its authority to regulate filling of steeply sloped areas and drainageways per se The hearings officer assures there is concurrent jurisdiction over the filling of the drainageway, and to City may reach a different conclusion tswill be issued for the f�ltiinL� set appears from make record dud Corps and ODSL per g, blect to itigation requirements. (3) The City is not obligated to acme'. 'ease mitigation measure in place of the drainageway simply because ODSL does. LIowcver, the fact would do so influences the hearings officer to consider the merits of mitigation. Compliance with sections 18:84.040(C)(1) may be based in part on mitigation for adverse effects that could or will occur as a result of proposed filling, because that mitigation affects the extent and nature of the site disturbances: (4) The applicant proposes to mitigate loss of the natural iesource values associated with the drainageway by providing a series of ponds for watt to pass through before it e � nn i wetlands south of the site and a lowland that can be inundated during peak See 'gam 6 of the application to ODSL, and the Corps, The FroF osed mitigation area is different from the existing drainageway in terms of vegetation, topography, an slopes visual charact�err. It will be created in an area that would be open space , a yw y gx opes and wetlands. The lack of details regarding the nutigation area mal.,e it hard to compare to the existing natural drainageway: The beatings officer finds the mitigation area will help maintain surface water quality on the site and will provide more wetland habitat. However, it will not replace the quality of the area that is being lost. (5) Fillin g ° the drainageway and creating a new wetland area does not minimize site disturbances. Less disturbance would be caused if a bridge were built >'cr the dr i geway' or the road was moved north g u+ �•. z �-�- �. so no fillip is required. However, assuming the drainage ' y is permitted to be filled for the mad, then bridging the drainageway or relocating the mad cannot be required Providing the wetland mitigation area reduce; the adv arse effects of the filling by lacing some of what is lost. To that '" f d� g by " F extent, it does mire the long term disturbance to the funvional values of the site (6) ` The fill extends. to a point south g : adjoining �� of the south edge of m to of the bank to top of bank. See sheets 4 the oversized dravain 'The record d top P and 6 of the ov gs lots and from not show why . g to accommodate the mad. The applicant hould use the minimum amount area. of fill is needed tc► ac ant of fill necessaiy for the mad and approydate transitions in grade to the natural elevation. It is not clear that is the case. Such a showing Paige 11 Hieapircgc Officer aeccdsaon SUB 93-00071S LB 93.0004 (Waverly &stater) .8shou required before a penult is granted to fill the drainagewity, pursuant to section (7) It is not clear from the record that the discharge from the drainageway pipeline to the gr and win not cause erosion or other adverse effects on the wetland due to the volume or rate of direhargc and the nature of surrounding soil and existing or proposed vegetation. Such a showing should be required before a permit is granted to fill the draina-ewa , pursuant to section 18:84.040(C)(2). 7e Another issue raised by heir. Cottle and others is the compatibility between the proposed subdivision and dairy farm to the east. He argues the proposal does not comply wig section 18.120, because the buffer between the uses is inadequate. a. The hearings officer fords that section 18.120 is not applicable to Et subdivision, because it has not bean applied to those applications in the past and does not appear to be intended for review of a subdivision That section does not apply to single family homes, and the applicant proposes a subdivision of lots for single family homes. b. Policy 6.6 requires a buffer between different types of land uses in all MILS. The hearings officer finds that msidential residential and agricultural land use air sufficiently different ent to be subject to this policy. It requires consideration of the following factors in determining the type and extent of required buffer: the purpose of the buffer, the size needed to fulfill its purpose, if 'ional factors, the required density of buffering, and the fixed or mobile character of ti :ewer. (1) In eats case, the viewers are the residents of the subdivision. Their homes and many viewpoints are fixed within the homes. The buffer is needed between the homes and the dairy faun. The buffer should ar Mress the noise, odors, dust, and activity associated with dairy farming. A combination o' •ienciing, distance, and existing or proposed vegetation should be used to mitigate these impacts together with a notice on the face of the plat or on documents filed with deeds to the prop erty informi ng g prospective purchasers that an agricultural activity i� conducted on-adjoinmg lands that may cause adverse effects. This mitigates the incompatibility between _ the uses and infer people who should be aware of it before purchasing a lot or home in the subdivision. A variety of suggestions were made about : what buffer to stoprovide. The hearings officer has adds ssed the buffer somewhat in discussin the on -site rm water quality feature, which can serve as a buffer,.too. .'T'he hearings officer finds the n farm h ;'wring fence where a � a minimum, a applican� 3nvuld install a 6-foot high sight -o, that at imposed single family lot abuts the farm y , establish a minimum 25-foot wide P po g those lots, and improve that landscape area with a landscape along the east side of tho of conifer and deciduous tree. Trees shoal row should be conifer; the west row can be a mix minimum of two rows of trees. The east . d be not less than 2-inches caliper at planting, with a matute height of more than 6 feet, and spaced to provide a relatively opaque barrier when ma. Documents filed with the deeds for the lots where those trees are planted shall be require to preserve them: A condition to this effect should be added. ca:,.(1SCUISION findings, ; .. the Based on the above f ndin and the conclusions in section of Staff Report, has ,�p4' n do or can comply with the . .. the proposed subdivision and landform alteration apphcable coprovisions of the City ode, and the a licant's request should be approved, subject to nditions and restrictions consistent ith the Code and this Final Oder. /page 12 Hearings Officer decision SUE 93- 000716LR 93 -0004 (Waverly Estates) DEM The hearings officer hereby approves SUB 93 and SLR 93 -0004 (Waverly Estates), subject to the conditions in Section VI of the S 'Repot with the following amendments: 1. Condition 9 is amended to add the bottoming sentence. The applicant sl' ell install a minimum 6-foot high fence to the extent at dogs not mast ahead e joining the north and south sides of the .agency mad. 2. Condi&on 12 is amended to read as follows: :• 12. The applicant shall provide an on -site water quality facility as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution awl. Order 91 -47. storm water quality facility shall tot located ytuidc of the wetland buffer. It shalll be assibie to County maintenance ti 'vehaiclesh The facility and access to and around the 'Awaits shall be dedicated to the City. b. The facility shall be located in whole a part along the east c4ge of the site (e.g., on lots 20/21 north of the p> opoed wetlands mitigation area) to the extent p ible while ra m iin removal of vegetation and grading, c. If the facility is situated tuated on lot 21, a 42= inew"iv, diameter maple, tree on that lot s should °ed if pr .cab e. A qualified arbori p °clrate in the design of the fatty as necessary to determine whether it', is practicable and, if it is practicable, should recommend measures erv'e the tom. The applicant shall comply with those recommendations. d. Public notice and an opportunity to comment on the facility plan should be provided if required by law. 3. Condition 8 is amended. to add the following sentence: The applicant shall maproTre tempar tee -aid at or near the east end of ent Dave within a rabble right of way or easement dedicated o re- r review r approval of the turn- around design and di sions b tie f i y en and eer and 'Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District. m 4: tonditam 11 is amended to add the following sentence: t9 uu The applicant licant shall amend the P,P the plat or file documents with d .,... Q . d. ee ds to the p requiring that building permits for ea ,. ch lot with erosion control measures on the approved plan, a copy of which available from the City: .511B 3 -� 7/J 93 4 (Waverly states) r.. 5.. Condition 13 is amended to mid the following sentence: No increase in off -site runoff rates or volumes is allowed uthess the applicant demonstrates it will not rnk eas . the potential for downstream flooding: • 6. ration 20 is amended to add the following sentence The tree removal permit application for the proposed public pr removed during rough improvements also shall eke „n of lots. trees that grill ,� 7. iX new condition 22 is added to reads as follows: 22. Before the Ci ty approves the final plat, the applicant shall amend the face of the plat or file documents with the deeds to the property to advise prospective purchasers that trees larger than 6 inches in diameter at breast height cannot be removed without first receiving a permit from the City pursuant to Tigaxri. City Code section 18.150. h. A it cw condition 23 is, added to read as follows: 23. The south edge of lots 38 and 39 shalt be moved north at least 50 feet from the wetland. 9, ri revs condition 24 is added to read as follows: 24. pp install a x . r�itia�.em'l six -foot high fence a�� the The applicant shall ins�...x �l north edge of required wetland buffer or further north. If the applicant does not install the fence at the north edge of the common open space, then the applicant shall post signs identifying the edge of the common open space '� prohibiting de�eelopment, clearing, grading, filling, or tree removal in and that area unless approved p g director. south of the fe to a roved . the iairuun direct ®r. , edest iatt -e rientt d pathways should be permitted sou with access to Lila wetland xd at relatively few points if any. Details regarding the fence, signage and potential pe destrian walkways a fence are delegated to the planning director for site development review and approval. 10. A new condition 25 is added to read as follows: 25. The applicant shall amend the face of the plat or file documents with deeds to . the property tw prohibiting development, Clearing, grading, filling, or tree removal in the common open spa. e, wetland buffer or g ppro y' e . y. , '.,ties and water quality wetland unless approved by the , �t Cthe�r than u�.�thes measures, only non-paved pedestrian walkways ate permitted in the common open space, wetland buffer or wetland. 11. A new condition 26 is added to read as follows: y 26. issues ��a a . y : �e �efrsr�. the �i � as�ues a ��r to fill the °�. g era �► portion site, the pp. : all show to te°'u satisfaction . . west �...artionn of the sett, the a leant shall . _.... for the that he will use the mini.znum amount of necessary City engineer t . _ mad, associated utilities and drainage, appropriate transitions in grade to the Page 14 - -- , 't irmgu Officer ,decesvottr dIB '93- 0007ISSQ 93- (Wat cr13 ,`states) re, t elctiation, and good engh*erin practice a pike willnot cause erosion at the dischharge new condition 27 is added as AAIOws. d hi en t obsca)r�ig fence 2�. The applicant sh l � , a.�c a proposed single family lot abuts the f establish a area ale► tie east side of those lots, and na�aunu� 25-foot wide landscape � improve that landscape with a imam of two tows O tom. The ea, . . row shall be confer; the west row can be a, ix of =lifer and deciduous tree. ,> � , with a uaat�u. Trees shy 1 nely less than 2 inches caliper at plan,tun �' opaque height of than 6 feet, and spaced to provide ;a rel velbarrier dee4s for the lots where those i s when arnatnase ±ants filed �� the _ _ planted those trees. a.�,. or retained shall., ra�n�e lot owners to pre-serve b A new condition 28 is added to read as follows: 28. °J , a. licant shall amend the face the plat or file documents with deeds to t ie P � advising r P ' � that land east of . � - prospective u� the site is used for a dairy farm tiaat cat cause noise, odors ind other effects that could affea, adjoining lan gs Officer • • Fu..., ... ' , 'tugs Officer decisions SUB 9300 0ISL R 93.01001 (Waeryy Estates) iMAITTIA r OR AGENDA ITEM 7 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Ken Waymire on STAFF REPORT behalf of R.A. and Linda Gray and Charles and SUB 93 -0007 Zada Lamb for Subdivision and Sensitive Lands SLR 93 -0004 Review approval. I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST CASE: Subdivision SUB 93 -0007 / Sensitive Lands Review SLR 93 -0004 SUMMARY: The applicant requests: 1) Subdivision approval to divide one parcel consisting of approximately 7.5 acres into 48 buildable lots ranging between 4,445 and 10,080 square feet in size; and 2) Sensitive Lands approval to allow to allow grading and filling for construction of street improvements on land designated as a wetland and for modifications to land with a slope greater than 25 percent. APPLICANT: Ken Waymire 31835 SW Country View Lane Wilsonville, OR 97070 OWNERS: R.A. and Linda Gray PO Box 1016 Sherwood, OR 97140 Charles and Zada Lamb 13770 SW. Fern Tigard, OR 97223 School District 23J 13137 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium - Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R -12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) LOCATION: A portion of land on SW 92nd Avenue between Tigard High School and Cook Park (WCTM 2S1 14A, tax lots 100 and 1000) APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.84, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18,108, 18,150, 18.160 and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to conditions. HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 1 II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Background Information: The City Council approved the redesignation of tax lot 1000 from Low - Density Residential to Medium - Density Residential, and a zone change from R -7(PD) to A -12 (later R -12), on December 5, 1983. The Hearings Officer approved CUP 90 -0001 on July 17, 1990 allowing the southern portion of the property in question to be developed with four ball fields and associated site improvements. This approval was valid until January 27, 1992. A one year extension was requested and granted thereby extending this approval until January 27, 1993. Since 1992, substantial modifications of the ball field area and wetlands have been completed to allow continuation of the conditional use approval. There are two additional applications filed in conjunction with this application. A lot line adjustment (MIS 93 -0002) was approved on March 11, 1993 which added a portion of the Tigard High School site (tax lot 100) to the subject parcel. Also, minor land partition (MLP 93 -0003) has been approved which divides tax lot 100 into two parcels. These adjustments have not yet been made at Washington County. For this reason only, Tigard High School is listed as property owner in this application review. These three application processes could have been reviewed as one application, however there is no requirement obligating the applicants to do so. There have been no other applications filed with the City for this site. B. Vicinity Information and Surrounding Land Uses: The Tigard High School property is located to the north of the subject site. Kneeland Estates Subdivision lies to the northwest. Cook Park lies to the west and south of the property. These neighboring- properties are zoned R -4.5 and are located within the City of Tigard. The Thomas Jersey Dairy Farm which is within unincorporated Washington County is located to the east and southeast of the subject property and is designated Low Density on the City's Comprehensive Plan Map. To the northeast and east is the Unified Sewerage Agency's Durham Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant. These properties are designated_for Light Industrial use in the City's Comprehensive Plan and are zoned Industrial Park (I -P). Access to the subject property is provided by SW 92nd Avenue, which extends southward from Durham Road to Cook Park. Southwest 92nd Avenue is functionally classified as a minor collector street by the City's Transportation Plan Map. Southwest 92nd Avenue is not fully improved adjacent to the subject site. C. Site Description: Tax Lot 1000 consists of 26.27 acres. The approval of Minor Land Partition MLP 93 -0003 reduces the size of the subject site to 11.12 acres. The parcel is located on a wooded hillside which drops a vertical distance of 50 feet over a linear distance of approximately 448 feet. Approximately 3.57 acres of the site is undevelopable due to HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 2 AGENDA ITEM 7 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Ken Waymire on STAFF REPORT behalf of R.A. and Linda Gray and Charles and SUB 93 -0007 Zada Lamb for Subdivision and Sensitive Lands SLR 93 -0004 Review approval. I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST CASE: Subdivision SUB 93 -0007 / Sensitive Lands Review SLR 93 -0004 SUMMARY: The applicant requests: 1) Subdivision approval to divide one parcel consisting of approximately 7.5 acres into 48 buildable lots ranging between 4,445 and 10,080 square feet in size; and 2) Sensitive Lands approval to allow to allow grading and filling for construction of street improvements on land designated as a wetland and for modifications to land with a slope greater than 25 percent. APPLICANT: Ken Waymire 31835 SW Country View Lane Wilsonville, OR 97070 OWNERS: R.A. and Linda Gray PO Box 1016 Sherwood, OR 97140 Charles and Zada Lamb 13770 SW. Fern Tigard, OR 97223 School District 23J 13137 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium - Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R -12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) LOCATION: A portion of land on SW 92nd Avenue between Tigard High School and Cook Park (WCTM 2S1 14A, tax lots 100 and 1000) APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.84, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18,108, 18,150, 18.160 and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to conditions. HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 1 II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Background Information: The City Council approved the redesignation of tax lot 1000 from Low - Density Residential to Medium - Density Residential, and a zone change from R -7(PD) to A -12 (later R -12), on December 5, 1983. The Hearings Officer approved CUP 90 -0001 on July 17, 1990 allowing the southern portion of the property in question to be developed with four ball fields and associated site improvements. This approval was valid until January 27, 1992. A one year extension was requested and granted thereby extending this approval until January 27, 1993. Since 1992, substantial modifications of the ball field area and wetlands have been completed to allow continuation of the conditional use approval. There are two additional applications filed in conjunction with this application. A lot line adjustment (MIS 93 -0002) was approved on March 11, 1993 which added a portion of the Tigard High School site (tax lot 100) to the subject parcel. Also, minor land partition (MLP 93 -0003) has been approved which divides tax lot 100 into two parcels. These adjustments have not yet been made at Washington County. For this reason only, Tigard High School is listed as property owner in this application review. These three application processes could have been reviewed as one application, however there is no requirement obligating the applicants to do so. There have been no other applications filed with the City for this site. B. Vicinity Information and Surrounding Land Uses: The Tigard High School property is located to the north of the subject site. Kneeland Estates Subdivision lies to the northwest. Cook Park lies to the west and south of the property. These neighboring- properties are zoned R -4.5 and are located within the City of Tigard. The Thomas Jersey Dairy Farm which is within unincorporated Washington County is located to the east and southeast of the subject property and is designated Low Density on the City's Comprehensive Plan Map. To the northeast and east is the Unified Sewerage Agency's Durham Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant. These properties are designated_for Light Industrial use in the City's Comprehensive Plan and are zoned Industrial Park (I -P). Access to the subject property is provided by SW 92nd Avenue, which extends southward from Durham Road to Cook Park. Southwest 92nd Avenue is functionally classified as a minor collector street by the City's Transportation Plan Map. Southwest 92nd Avenue is not fully improved adjacent to the subject site. C. Site Description: Tax Lot 1000 consists of 26.27 acres. The approval of Minor Land Partition MLP 93 -0003 reduces the size of the subject site to 11.12 acres. The parcel is located on a wooded hillside which drops a vertical distance of 50 feet over a linear distance of approximately 448 feet. Approximately 3.57 acres of the site is undevelopable due to HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 2 steep slopes and wetlands. The property is completely undeveloped. The site also contains a mixture of grasses, brushy vegetation and mature trees. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Community Development Code. 1. Chapter 18.54.050 contains standards for the R -12 zone. A single - family detached residential unit is a permitted use in this zone. Detached single- family residential lots in this zone must comply with the following dimensional requirements: Minimum lot size 3,050 square feet Front setback 15 feet Garage setback 20 feet Interior sideyard setback 5 feet Corner sideyard setback 10 feet Rear setback 15 feet Maximum building height 35 feet 2. Chapter 18.84.015(C) states that landform alterations within wetland areas must meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of the Division of State Lands (DSL), US Army Corps_of Engineers, Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) and /or other federal, state or regional agencies. Therefore, a City of Tigard Sensitive Lands Permit for this purpose is not required. However, all other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive lands permits for areas meeting non - wetland sensitive land.. criteria. Since the applicant proposes to modify the drainageway and to modify slopes greater than 25 percent grade, a sensitive lands permit shall be required as per Section 18.84.015(D). This section states that such a permit shall be obtained before construction or development begins within these areas. The approval criteria for modifications to drainageways are listed in Section 18.84.040(C). These applicable criteria are: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the use; 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on -site and off -site effects or hazards to life or property; 3. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the area not covered by HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 3 steep slopes and wetlands. The property is completely undeveloped. The site also contains a mixture of grasses, brushy vegetation and mature trees. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Community Development Code. 1. Chapter 18.54.050 contains standards for the R -12 zone. A single - family detached residential unit is a permitted use in this zone. Detached single- family residential lots in this zone must comply with the following dimensional requirements: Minimum lot size 3,050 square feet Front setback 15 feet Garage setback 20 feet Interior sideyard setback 5 feet Corner sideyard setback 10 feet Rear setback 15 feet Maximum building height 35 feet 2. Chapter 18.84.015(C) states that landform alterations within wetland areas must meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of the Division of State Lands (DSL), US Army Corps_of Engineers, Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) and /or other federal, state or regional agencies. Therefore, a City of Tigard Sensitive Lands Permit for this purpose is not required. However, all other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive lands permits for areas meeting non - wetland sensitive land.. criteria. Since the applicant proposes to modify the drainageway and to modify slopes greater than 25 percent grade, a sensitive lands permit shall be required as per Section 18.84.015(D). This section states that such a permit shall be obtained before construction or development begins within these areas. The approval criteria for modifications to drainageways are listed in Section 18.84.040(C). These applicable criteria are: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the use; 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on -site and off -site effects or hazards to life or property; 3. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the area not covered by HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 3 structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening; 5. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan; and 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. 3. Chapter 18.88.040(C)(1) contains solar access standards for new residential development. A lot meets the basic solar access lot standard if it has a north -south dimension of 90 feet or more and has a front lot line that is oriented within 30 degrees of a true east -west axis. A subdivision complies with the basic requirement if 80% or more of the newly created lots meet or exceed this standard. 4. Chapter 18.92.020 contains standards for density. The number of dwelling units permitted is based on the net development area, excluding sensitive land areas and land dedicated for public roads or parks, or for private roadways. This land area is then divided by the minimum parcel size permitted by the zoning district to determine the number of lots which may be created on a site. 5. Chapter 18.102.030 specifies vision clearance triangles adjacent to intersections in which the height of plantings, signs, etc. are limited to three feet in height to assure safe and adequate sight distance at intersections to reduce potential hazards from vehicular turning movements. Alternatively, trees may be limbed up to eight feet in height. 6. Chapter 18.108.070 contains standards for single - family residential vehicular access. A common private accessway which serves between three to six residences must be a minimum of 30 feet wide with a minimum pavement width of at least 24 feet, curbs and a walkway. 7. Chapter 18.150.020(E) requires a permit for removal_of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter measured` four feet above the ground on undeveloped residential land. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria as specified in Chapter 18.150.030(A): a. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; b. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 4 c. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; d. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space; e. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and f. New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. 8. Chapter 18.160.060(A) contains standards for the subdividing of parcels into 4 or more lots. To be approved, a preliminary plat must comply with the following criteria: a. The proposal must comply with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the applicable zoning ordinance and other applicable ordinances and regulations; b. The proposed plat name must not be duplicative and must otherwise satisfy the provisions of ORS Chapter 92; c. The streets and roads must be laid out so as to conform to the plats of subdivisions and maps of partitions or subdivisions already approved for adjoining property as to width, general direction and in all other respects unless the City determines it is in the public interest to modify the street or road pattern; and d. An explanation has been provided for all common improvements. 9. Chapter 18.164 contains standards for streets and utilities. ' a. Section 18.164.030(A) requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of the street. b. Section 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) requires local streets to be constructed with 34 feet of pavement within a 50 foot right -of -way. c. Section 18.164.060 prohibits lot depth from being more than 21 times the lot width and requires at that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. d. Section 18.164.070 requires sidewalks adjoining all residential streets. e. Section 18.164.090 requires sanitary sewer service. HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 5 f. Section 18.164.100 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements for storm drainage facilities. B. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. 1. Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development review process. 2. Policy 3.1.1 provides that all development in areas identified as containing wetlands and slopes in excess of 25% grade be designed to comply with approved engineering techniques to make the area suitable for the proposed development. 3. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard urban planning area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. 4. Policy 7.1.2 provides the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and utilities placed underground. 5. Policy 7.3.1 provides the City will coordinate water services with water districts. 6. Policy 7.4.4 requires all new development to be connected to an approved sanitary sewer system. 7. Policy 7.6.1 requires that the development be served by a water system having adequate water pressure for fire protection purposes and that the Fire District review all such applications. 8. Policy 8.1.1 provides the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. 9. Policy 8.1.3 provides the City will require as a precondition of approval that: a. Development abut a dedicated street or have other adequate access; b. Street right -of -way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; c. The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs, sidewalks to City standards within the development. d. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 6 e. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. IV. NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Tigard Water District states that, although they have no objections to the proposal, the District will require that an 8 inch D.I. water main be extended from SW 92nd Avenue to the east end of the project. Fire hydrant placement will be coordinated between Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue and the Water District. 2. The Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) has commented: a. A water quality facility, designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorous from the runoff from 100 percent of the new proposed impervious surface, should be installed. This project does not meet the criteria for allowing the fee in lieu of such a facility. The following information should be required with the plan for the facility: Calculations of phosphorous removal. Landscape plan of the facility. Maintenance plan of the facility. b. A hydrological analysis of the watershed to determine the impact of a 100 year storm on the downstream facilities should be required. c. The 25 foot undisturbed corridor shall be contained in a tract, separate from any lot, and should be fenced. The water quality facility cannot lie within the undisturbed corridor unless additional buffer area is mitigated. d. Washington County Flood Plain Maps, Corps of Engineer maps and FEMA maps all indicate the flood plain elevation in the area of this project to be 126 feet above mean sea level, not 125 feet as indicated on the applicant's plans. Does the City of Tigard have differing information? e. Detail drawings of manholes, catch basins, backfill, etc., have not been included with this set of plans. Catch basins shall have an 18 inch sump. f. A redesign of public storm lines will be necessary due to the water quality facility requirement. The existing plan does not provide for footing drainage for many of the lots. In particular, lots 24, 25, 26, 33, 34 and 43. A drainage plan is needed showing that flow will be dissipated before leaving the lot when discharging footing and roof drains to the common area. g. It looks like the sanitary sewer could be designed so there are not so many wetland /sensitive land crossings. The Agency would HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 7 not approve the long laterals serving some of the lots. It looks questionable as to whether the lots on the south side of SW Kent Drive can be served by gravity based on the five foot contour lines. 3. GTE has reviewed this proposal and has requested that the developer /builder contact GTE at least 30 days prior to trench opening. 4. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this. proposal and has commented that there are no provisions for storm drainage from lots 24, 25, 26, 33 and 34. 5. Tigard School District 23J has reviewed the proposal and has noted that the proposed development is projected to generate 18 new students for Durham Elementary School, 6 students at Twality Middle School, and 4 students at Tigard High School. The School District notes that school capacities at the High School and Durham Elementary School are already exceeded, although Twality Middle School is presently below capacity. The District notes that the core facility of both the High School and Durham Elementary School are insufficient to be able to consider portable additions. Additional school capacity may be provided by other options under consideration by the School District, including: grade level reconfiguration, rescheduled school year, boundary adjustments, double shifting, busing to under - utilized facilities, future bond measures leading to construction of new facilities and other school housing options. 6. Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO 6) reviewed this application on March 17, 1993 and requests that the City postpone the March 30 hearing date to enable the NPO to review the staff report and any other reports . available prior to the hearing. In addition to the March 17 NPO meeting, which was staffed by Senior Planner Dick Bewersdorff, the applicant attended a previous NPO meeting to discuss the basic design of this subdivision with those attending. This previous meeting was also attended by Associate Planner Jerry Offer. The staff recommendation is available for public review at least seven days prior to the public hearing. When NPO comments, and comments submitted by other utility and reviewing agencies, are submitted within the review period, they are included within the staff recommendation. All agencies and the public have an opportunity to review this recommendation, along the entirety of the applicant's file, prior to the _ public hearing. Additional verbal or written testimony may also be presented during the public hearing. The NPO also requests that approval of the associated minor land partition (SUB 93 -0003) be subject to the approval of this subdivision request. The intent is that if the subdivision is denied, there is then no reason to partition this lot into two parcels. While the City understands that this may well be the case, this is not a justifiable reason for the City to deny a reasonable and legally approvable land use request. Due to the timing of these two applications, the City will recommend a condition of approval requiring the recording of the land partition prior to the recording of the final subdivision plat. HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 8 7. A letter was submitted to the City on March 17, 1993 from the Friends of Cook Park. This letter recommends that the following provisions be adopted in the approval of this subdivision request. The recommended provisions are: a. Provide a wetlands impact statement from an alternative source other than the developer. STAFF -The developer shall be required to file applications with the Division of State Lands and /or the Corps of Engineers for approval to modify the wetlands. b. Provide a wildlife impact statement indicating a plan of how to maintain the present wildlife. STAFF - No separate wildlife impact statement is required by the City. Rather, this shall be •- addressed as a portion of the wetland and habitat 'information provided in order to obtain the appropriate State permits. c. Reduce the number of homes to meet the recommended criteria. STAFF - See analysis under Section V. d. Homes located west of the Thomas Dairy will have a buffer of trees and open space. STAFF - The City Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinances do not allow the City to require a buffer between these two specific uses. An on -site water quality facility is recommended near the southeast corner of the site. This facility will provide a partial buffer between these uses along a portion of the common property lines. e. Provide a buffer of trees between the development site to protect wetlands and create a buffer between proposed baseball fields and potential homes. STAFF - A 25 foot buffer around the perimeter of the wetland is a standard requirement. There is no code provision to require that the potential future baseball fields be buffered from these proposed residences. f. Storm drains to drain into filtering system set up by USA prior to entering the wetlands. STAFF - The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47), Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in- lieu of their construction. Section 7.10 of Resolution and Order No. 91 -47 list three criteria for not requiring a on -site facility. One of these three criteria are: ... "the site topography or soils makes it impractical, or ineffective to construct an on -site facility." See analysis in Section V regarding the City's determination to accept a fee -in -lieu of the installation of such a facility. g. Cul -de -sacs to be no more than 400 feet long. STAFF - This application request does not propose a cul -de -sac for the public street. The temporary dead -end at the east end of the site will be required to terminate with a temporary turn - around. h. Maintain all existing streams and vegetation. No placing streams in pipes. STAFF - The State of Oregon Division of State Lands has HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 9 the jurisdiction to review and approve applications for wetlands modifications. Displacement of wetlands requires either on -site of off -site mitigation. The City of Tigard Engineering Division will review all drainage and land form modifications proposed on this site. i. Eliminate alley ways (inlets) that are on a steep hill and extend into wetlands. This poses safety issues for fire and pedestrians. STAFF - The locations of the proposed three private streets are not wetland locations. The wetlands are located south of these streets, and south of the lots which are to be served by them. The proposed private streets, and a number of lots, are located . within areas with greater than a 25 percent slope. Approved grading plans shall be to Engineering Department standards and acceptable to the Tualatin Valley Fire District. j. Limit number of trees that are cut. No fir trees over six inches in diameter. STAFF - The Community Development Code (Section { 18.150) allows for trees to be removed as necessary to accommodate structures, streets, utilities, and other needed or required improvements within the development proposed. The applicant may remove those trees for which the City has issued permits. Trees smaller than six inches in diameter when measured four feet above grade are exempt from the City's tree removal permit process. k. The developer will aid financially in the development of a trail from Cook Park to Tualatin Park. STAFF - The City is not able to obligate participation for such an off -site improvement for this development application. The burden which would need to be demonstrated would be to show that the specific need for the trail is a direct result of the creation of this specific subdivision. Regional participation may be requested through other means. 8. Portland General Electric and Northwest Natural Gas have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. Compliance with Community Development Code. 1. The proposed subdivision complies with the use standards of the - R-12 zoning district (Section 18.54.050) because the lots are intended to be developed as single - family detached dwelling units; a permitted use in this zone. The 48 lots ranging in size between 4,445 and 10,080 square feet are all larger than the minimum 3,050 square foot minimum lot size requirement of this zone. All lots are subject to the setback standards of the R -12 zone.. Compliance with these standards will be reviewed as part of the building permit application process for single- family homes constructed on individual lots. The site plan indicates two open space areas; one in the northwest corner of the site and the other in the northeast corner. The City contends that these two open spaces should be incorporated into, and become part of, the adjacent lots HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93- 0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 10 rather than be unmaintained areas. This shall be recommended as a condition of approval for this development. 2. The applicant has indicated on page 3 -8 of the preliminary plat, the area of the site containing slopes of greater than 25 percent grade. This is a "U" shaped area which roughly covers the portion of the site between the wetland buffer and the proposed Kent Drive. Prior to any such modifications on -site, the applicant shall submit, and receive approval for, such grading plans from the City of Tigard Engineering Department. All applicable City standards shall be met. Wetlands have been identified on the southern portion of the site. Northwest EnviroScience, Inc. has performed a wetland delineation and preliminary mitigation concept plan for the site. The development of this site will require the filling of approximately 0.15 acres. The mitigation plan calls for a wetland creation area of 0.2 acres and an enhancement area of 0.2 acres. The mitigation will take place on the southeast corner of the site. The identified wetlands and the mitigated wetlands are classified as sensitive land areas under Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. ' This classification requires that an undisturbed corridor be provided which is a minimum of 25 feet wide; measured horizontally from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area. The applicant has defined the sensitive area and provided for this required 25 foot buffer. At the time of application for this development, the applicant had not made application to the Corps of Engineers or the Division of State Lands. The applicant should be to required to apply and meet'the requirements of the Oregon Division of State Lands and Army Corps of Engineers as they pertain to the wetlands and their mitigation. The approval criteria for modifications in sensitive lands areas have been satisfied as noted below: a. The proposed land form alterations /development are the result of the application of the minimum required standards in order to provide adequate access to the proposed lots on this site. The applicant's development plans have attempted to avoid the wetland and drainage area other than as required to tie the development together. The number of lots proposed is less than that permitted. b. The proposed land form alterations /development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on -site or off -site effects or hazards as shall be approved by the City Engineering Department upon future review. Erosion control measures and approved engineering designs shall be used for all such modifications. HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 11 • c. The water flow capacity. of the drainageway will not be • decreased. Plans verifying this standard shall be submitted to, and approved by, the City Engineering Department. • d. The area where vegetation is to be removed for such modifications will be mitigated on -site according to an approved on -site mitigation plan as accepted by DSL. e. The drainageway will be replaced by a storm drain of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow as approved the City of Tigard Engineering Department. f. Required State of Oregon permits have not been. applied for regarding the proposed land form modification /development plans. This shall be a condition of approval for this development. 3. Twenty -eight of the lots meet the basic solar access requirements as specified in Code Section 18.88.040(C)(1) (lots 2 -16, 24 -27, 33 -35, 38, 42 -45, and 48). The front lot line orientation of these lots is within 30 degrees of true east -west. These lots also provide a minimum north -south dimension of at least 90 feet. The balance of the lots do not meet the requirements. Lots 46 and 47 do not have front. lot lines oriented within 30 degrees of true • east -west. The balance of the lots lack a the required 90 foot . north -south dimension; some of these lots also lack the required front lot line orientation. The applicant's narrative states that protected solar building lines shall be applied to lots 1, 28, 31 and 36 according to the provisions allowed in Section 18.88.040(C)(2). Therefore, these • four lots shall comply with these requirements. Of the total number of lots, Ten of the lots can be counted as the standard 20% exemption from these solar lot requirements. The • balance of these lots (six lots) are accepted by staff as exceptions to these standards as per Sections 18.88.040(E)(1)(a)(ii) and (iii). There is wetland area located on the south portion of this site within which the-applicant is • proposing no development and only a small amount of:mitigation. This wetland will remain in existence after this development is completed. In order to utilize the buildable portions of this site, and to continue the desired road pattern in this area, the applicant is limited in ability to create fully solar lots without • significantly reducing the total number of lots. Therefore, is it recommended that the balance of these 48 lots (seven lots) be exempted from the solar access requirements according to the above referenced adjustments to design standards. 4. The proposed subdivision complies with the density standards of Chapter 18.92.020 (Density). The net developable area of the site (after deduction of the public right -of -way and the undevelopable portions of this site) is approximately 328,639 square feet (7.55 BEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 12 i.. acres); the gross site is approximately 11.12 acres. With a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet per dwelling unit, this site yields an opportunity for 107 dwelling units under the R -12 zoning designation. The applicant has proposed the creation of 48 single- family lots and therefore, complies with this standard. 5. Chapter 18.102 (Visual Clearance) requires that adequate vision be provided at all road intersections. This standard shall be satisfied by adherence to the requirements regarding the height and placement of any future possible obstructions including a subdivision identification sign. Prior to the installation of any such sign, a sign permit from the Planning Department must be obtained. The sign permit review and approval process will require a finding that the sign will be consistent with the requirements of Chapters 18.102 (Vision Clearance) and 18.114 (Signs). 6. Chapter 18.108 (Access) and Section 18.164.060(B) (Lot Frontage) are satisfied in that at least 25 feet of frontage is provided for all lots; including those served from private streets. Therefore, all proposed lots meet the required lot frontage widths as specified by this code standard. 7. The applicant has provided a tree inventory for this site, but has not yet applied a tree removal permit for this site as required by Section 18.150.020(E) (Tree Removal). Therefore, prior to the issuance of a tree removal permit, the applicant shall supply a map specifying the trees being requested for removal as they relate to: 1) public improvements infrastructure, and 2) building envelopes. This information shall identify the type and size of all trees on this site which are greater than six inches in diameter relative to each tree removal permit application. 8. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the subdivision approval standards of Chapter 18.160.060(A) (Subdivisions) because: a. The proposed subdivision complies with the Comprehensive Plan Map's Medium -High Density Residential density opportunity for the site as well as with the applicable plan policies, the regulations of the R -12 zone, and other applicable regulations; b. The proposed name of the subdivision (Waverly Estates) is not duplicative of any other plat recorded in Washington County; c. The proposed public streets provide for adequate and safe access to the lots in this proposed subdivision. This preliminary plat also provides for a future extension of a proposed street stub abutting adjacent property. HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 13 9. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and offers the following analysis with regard to streets, ' sanitary sewers and storm drainage: • A. Streets: • Access to the site is gained from SW 92nd Avenue which is ;.' ,:. classified as a minor collector and has the following minimum standards (all distances are from centerline): 30 feet of right - 1 of -way, 20 feet of pavement, curb and sidewalk. Existing conditions reflect 25 feet of right -of -way, 12 -14 feet of pavement, no curbs or sidewalk. The applicant is proposing, and should be required, to bring SW 92nd Avenue up to minimum standards along the 50 foot frontage of the development. The applicant is proposing to serve the development with a local east /west street. Three private streets with "hammerheads" are also proposed to serve the southern portion of the site. The applicant is proposing, and should be required, to meet all local /private street standards for such streets. At the eastern terminus of the local east /west street, the applicant is proposing to install a 20 foot wide strip extending to SW 85th Avenue. This improvement is entirely on property which is part of tax lot 1000. This 20 foot wide strip will be dedicated and improved for fire access as well as a bike /pedestrian path to SW 85th Avenue. B. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer line located along the southern property line to which the applicant is proposing to connect- to serve this development. This - line has the capacity to accommodate this development. C. Storm Drainage: The applicant is proposing to collect the storm water at.various points within the subdivision and direct it toward the wetlands. • The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47), Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. Section 7.10 of Resolution and Order No. 91 -47 list three criteria for not requiring a on -site facility. One of these three criteria are: ... "the site topography or soils makes it impractical, or ineffective to construct an on -site facility." The applicant has requested that a fee in -lieu be imposed because of the steep slopes. The Engineering Department has noted the following concerns with requiring a water quality facility on this site: HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 14 a. The only place to install a facility is downstream, which is either on steep slopes (greater than 25 percent) or in the wetlands buffer area. b. If a facility was installed, the City would be required to maintain it. Installed in such an area as described above would add extra ordinary maintenance cost and concerns. The runoff from all 48 lots is proposed to be discharged into the existing wetland. The effect that the phosphorus contained in the runoff will have upon the wetland area is of primary concern. The obligation of this development proposal is to provide such a facility unless it can be demonstrated that the facility is either unnecessary, or impossible. The City finds that the conscruction of a water quality facility on this site is both possible and necessary. The City finds that two options exist: a. Place the facility to the south of lots 28 - 37. An access roadway for maintenance purposes would need to be constructed. This roadway could be placed between lots 44 and 45 above the storm drain. This option would necessitate the removal of a large ::umber of mature Cedar, Alder and Fir trees. The necessary grading would probably cause a greater encroachment into the wetland. b. Place the facility in the location of lots 20 and /or 21 and /or 22. This would cause the developer the loss of one to three proposed building lots. The • facility could be accessed through SW Kent Court,, The City recommends that the facility be provided in the location of lots 20, 21 and /or 22. This option would create a lesser environmental impact. Additionally, the City's concerns regarding the affect of the odor, noise and flies from the adjacent Thomas Dairy upon the future residents of these lots would be mitigated by utilizing one or more of these adjacent lots for a required water quality facility. Therefore, the applicant should be required to install an on -site water quality facility to serve this subdivision. D. Wetlands: Wetlands have been identified on the southern portion of the site. Northwest EnviroScience, Inc. performed a wetland delineation and preliminary mitigation concept plan for the site. The development of this site will require the filling of approximately 0.15 acres. The mitigation plan calls for a wetland creation area of 0.2 acres and a enhancement area of 0.2 acres; all to be done on -site. The identified wetlands, and the mitigated wetlands are both classified as sensitive areas under Resolution and Order No. 91- HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 15 47. The sensitive land area criteria requires that an undisturbed buffer be provided which is at least a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area. The applicant has defined the sensitive area and has provided for the 25 foot buffer as required. At the time of application for this development proposal, the applicant had not yet made application to the Corps of Engineers or the Division of State Lands. The applicant should be to required to apply and meet the requirements of the Oregon Division of State Lands and Army Corps of Engineers as they pertain to the wetlands and their mitigation. B. Compliance With Comprehensive Plan Policies 1. The subdivision is consistent with Policy 2.1.1 because notice of the application and the public hearing on this item was provided to the neighborhood planning organization (NPO #6) and to owners of property within the notification area of the site. An ad has been placed in Tigard Times which has advertised the time and place of the public hearing to be held on this application. 2. This proposal is consistent with Policy 3.1.1 because evidence of the acceptance of a Division of State Lands wetlands mitigation plan shall be required as a condition of approval. All grading and improvement plans shall be reviewed and accepted by the City of Tigard Engineering Department prior to the issuance of any site permits. 3. In order to comply with Policy 4.2.1, a condition is warranted to require the developer to prepare an erosion control plan ensuring compliance with erosion control standards for the Tualatin River Basin as part of the grading permit application. The developer shall construct an on -site water quality facility as required by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and USA regulations 4. This subdivision proposal complies with Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend public sewer and water systems to this site and will provide for underground installation of phone, electricity, and cable television lines. 5. The subdivision proposal complies with Policy 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposed extension and improvements to the street within and adjacent to the subdivision should contribute to a safe and efficient street system in this area. The creation of SW Kent Drive and Thorn, Lloyd and Kent Courts will be required to be improved consistent with the City of Tigard standards for public local and private streets respectively. HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 16 • VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division concludes that the proposed subdivision, will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state and federal laws. In recognition of the findings staff recommends APPROVAL of Subdivision proposal SUB 93 -0007, and Sensitive Lands Review SLR 93 -0004 for the proposed Waverly Estates subdivision subject to the conditions which follow. ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THE STAFF CONTACT FOR ALL RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS IS CHRIS DAVIES IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, 639 -4171. 1. A Sensitive Lands Permit shall be obtained by the applicant from the US Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands, (Authority: Section 404, Clean Water Act, and ORS 541.605 and 641.695). A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department by the applicant. 2. The applicant shall provide, as a minimum, a 25 foot buffer along the drainageways and along the boundary of the wetland areas which meets the requirements of Section 6.08, of R&O No. 91 -47. 3. The preliminary plat shall be revised to incorporate the common areas in the northwest and northeast corners of the site into the adjacent lots. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy, Planning Department 4. The applicant shall be required to provide an on -site water quality facility as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. 5. Prior to this subdivision plat being recorded with Washington County the Lot Line adjustment and Minor Land Partition, referred to in the City of Tigard Planning records as MIS 93 -0002 and MLP 93 -0003, respectively, shall either be approved and recorded prior to or recorded simultaneously with this subdivision plat. 6. Additional right -of -way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage to increase the right -of -way to 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right -of -way centerline. 7. Standard half - street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground of utilities shall be installed along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to minor collector street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved by the Engineering Department. HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 17 8. Full width street improvements, including traffic control devices, mailbox clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway aprons, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed within the subdivision. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to local street standards. 9. The applicant shall provided for emergency access from the eastern terminus of the local street to SW 85th Avenue. This access shall include dedication of right -of -way, bike /pedestrian access, and some type of breakaway access control which will prevent motor vehicles from using the path except for emergency vehicles. The access control shall be approved by the Tualatin Valley Fire District. _ 10. Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. 11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of -the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans ;. - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989. 12. The applicant shall provide an on -site water quality facility as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution - and Order No. 91 -47. The applicant may pay the fee in -lieu for that portion of the site which cannot be directed through the water quality facility. The final determination as to the amount of the fee, if any, shall be established by the City Engineer. 13. Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. - 14. A grading plan shall be submitted showing both the existing and proposed contours and typical finished floor elevations on each lot, including elevations at 4 different corners of the floor plan tied to the top of curb elevations as shown on the public improvement plans. 15. The applicant should be aware that the City of Tigard has adopted Chapter 70 of the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code. The grading plan shall comply with all requirements of this chapter. 16. Prior to the plat being recorded with Washington County the applicant shall provide a 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment. As an alternative the applicant may have the plat recorded after the public improvements have been accepted by the City of Tigard and has posted the appropriate Maintenance Bond. HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 18 17. The applicant shall make an appointment for a pre - construction meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of the public improvement plans but before starting work on the site. The applicant, the applicant's engineer and contractor shall be required to attend this meeting prior to receiving the approved plans and permits. 18. Construction of the proposed public improvements and issuance of Building Permits shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans, a street opening permit or construction compliance agreements has been executed, execution of a developer- engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees. 19. The applicant shall obtain a "Joint Permit" from the City of Tigard. This permit shall meet the requirements of the NPDES and Tualatin Basin Erosion Control Program. 20. A tree survey identifying the type and size of all trees on the site which are over 6 inches in diameter shall be submitted. This survey shall also specify those trees which are proposed for removal in connection with the construction of public improvements. A tree removal permit shall be applied for and approved by the Planning Division prior to the removal of any such trees on -site. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Division. - THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 21. A tree survey identifying the type and size of all trees on the site which are over 6 inches in diameter shall be submitted. This survey shall specify those trees which are proposed for removal in connection with the construction of residences. A tree removal permit shall be applied for and approved by the Planning Division prior to the removal of any such trees on -site. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Division. SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID ONLY IF THE FINAL PLAT IS SUBMITTED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. 3- a 3- 473 Prepared By: Ron Pomeroy Date Assistant Planne .9 .,Ce2J - Off .5- Z 7,3 Approved By: Dick Bewe•t'►:orff Date Senior P , anner HEARINGS OFFICER - GRAY -LAMB / WAYMIRE SUB 93 -0007 / SLR 93 -0004 PAGE 19 GERALD CACHr 12525 SW MAIN ST TIGARD OR . 97223 JACK .P0 15 16000 SW QUEEEN ' I :`TORIA PL r . KING CITY OR 97224 WIr,u,rAm L. PARKS DI:YIS,ION OF STATE i,iANDS 775' S *1mtvER or SAL1 1 'ea 97311 -3.331. 'IM ROTH 12300 SW ,69TH, TIGAtTO 91224 SUE CARVER 10155 SW HOVIE'W DR TIGARD OR 97224 DANMITCH!,L. 16585 SW 92ND TIGARD OR 97224 ESA GILBEERy Xi 16515 SW UPP#24 BOOMS FERRY RD TIGAM OR 97224 FRIENDS or 0340IC PARK MARY FEININGER 16545 SW 93RD TI A. OR 97224 KENNETH 'G AYE IRE 31835 SW C.Y VIEW LANE `+ ILSONVILLE OR 97070 DENNIS SMITH NOR ,ST CIVIL DESIGN, INC. 9130` SW PIONEER CT SUITE E WILSONVILLE OR 97070 MARK CO1TLE '850 L LNCOLi T06''t 10260 SW GREENBURG RD ',TIGARD OR 97223 JOHN & SALLY THOMAS 16575 SW 85TH TIGARD OR 97224 ananag & ZA.JA LAMB 13770 SW TrE`N TIGAW OR 97223 CAROL PAXMAN 15815 SW ST iFORD LP TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD SCHOOL DIST 23,7` 13137 SW PACIFIC l lx TIGARD OR 97223 DOUG SMITHEY 11396 SW IRONWOW ' LOOP rAIGARD OR 97223 r�slon4uOf• State Lands 77€ Summer Street NE Salem, oR Ir 3784805.; ; `VISK�) N Oil STATE 1 +'R �1 ��j �4 ,Yr ' atfarN�way� Prof �.,� �t Per r it I evict Laic Notice Y pw;r e,� z�`' ?� �° SJ� tlrhtaN i'�! °�'hh:r °1,''f�• � Co sfal Zone 0 Willamette Greenwcy� 0 LWRMP A Scenic Wate vay ' , hed al has . •r . The x'it9tt�h ",�,�.V,- •,.x, =rr ,� been b'e�eiv,:ed for , e � please time tht� 1lorrn or c ti'och er sandtle m tt to tit �° b WO If addros ) dridl�` ! U comment or V r work Within f v � !ed rr,�N®r to;sY ya�r °L b '� ' IO hearing may �b requested e h Id \� 6 cloys try the doe of the notice,. If a Art f l "� proposed project, ,cony ®nrd�rn�ea ,� ! crf6'I?� the pn✓P��t pc+t�tcr�e; , r� } public .hearIr Is r uested. ►e d of director. of the vIS u hearing wik t�•held based on i Qe eeqq � � S�.ir't ®4 Sto e P " mordts of 1t i+o st or�d the le $. 1 LI, II yY 4 �1 ?N pu ! - • 1 M M ` «�rik �4 nkz`�, �NY0�git, Yz ii:9wY,';1 . I I , °' 'wt�,>{�► °� �:,, , , " • � ° +:`' T�iS �Ii E IS • NOT ii A PERMIT have e reviewed t , . 9e attached Inf ,rmatlon and offer the following comments: A perm t is required by this agency. W* do not believe the project would have an adverse effe0t0 hou h met:tu ble W4 d a "�e believe ahe effects of tfte pr ®eat elf . g p We bolleve the projeOt would at ac 'eptable If methods of confructIon or diesign wore altNtd at listed ▪ We would attend a c rference with the Op111dont to see€ project :q .. dIt ®rDobtlae5:" • The project is tandcoeptabie as proposed: (Please explain lbeloW.) • We have no c mmerite COMMENTS: y March 26, 1993 Waverly ConstrOction Co. 9130 SW Pioneer Court, Suite E Wilsonville, OR 97070 Re State Permit No.: RF 7211 Wetland - Fi.l1. Dear AppUd Kant s A"fl- 9 AND 160ARD 13ARI3A ROE r RTS (3ov crnrr PI III, JISLING tcrekry of State )11V1 PA U. Slate Trea±:tirer We e your icatiOn for he leacenent of fill i r wetland area Ti g ard, Oregon. Please use the above referenced State permit number on all future correspondence. Based on youic application, a State permit will be required. Your application will be , nt to appropriate State auencites, local governments, aeliocent property owners and other `interested persons or }review' and comment. You mu. i also receive puthoriz�.tiomr when required, f Army Corps ngine�ers and local Planning depo tment before beginning co struct: on initial review of your application indicates that compensatory m .tigat on (replacement of filled or 'drained wetlands and Waterways) Will be requirela as a condition of permit issuance. For projects reguiting Compensatory Mitigation applicants must complete the bnclosed Compensatory Mitigation Form as part of the permit appli.cRiti.o n A Permit ~�� icata on fee of 450.04 (Base Fee ft $.375.00 4 V ltne Fee � $75: 00) is required for your project to complete yat r state application. pl ase remit by April 19, 1993, and reference: your re itt nLe to State Permit No RF 7271. I have ben a .signed to coo; ditnate you project Please c !. X me at 178 -3805, ext. 234 if you ha a any questions. bale as9e .5: Army Ewvsps %�> ng veer$ Dana ie Er .ed, Dept. of ?nvi ro�n� ci al Qkia1ity Ron Rathuu I7; Ci�i�oS JLd31l1cf;: j Inc. 775 Summer Street WE d) 37Ii-D5 PAX (913)378484.,,,i,./- Anna n� DEPARTMENT OF '`i`ilE A PORTLAND 113,6- .fRlCT4 CORPS OF Ei ,,G$N1✓E�7�S Of a, a0X. x948 Pt�0r,' 1,AND OREGON 972062846 RtpIy to iattention of: ar,d Engineering Q„i,w si.on aro11' l7, 1993 S it.JEC `; Permit App cation No, g3, -167 Waverly Construction ;Company ATTN Dennis Smith 9130 SW Pioneer Court, Suite "E Wilsortmrill.e , Oregon 97070 Dear Mr. Smith: We have received your application for Department of the. Amity tion P PP Y cubic yards of fill 4m material in . authorization to lace a rox%inatel 950 cubr ' 0 15 acres of g ,� ro�a.matel 0 s 57 acres of existing wetland. Washin �;�n l,�,oun,�y, ..�teg�ra. drainage char�nel wetland in Tigard, PP Y e enhanced and 0.15 r?' ,Icres of wetland will be created as mitigation for the Wetland Urea filled. Based on the information included in your application, the proposed work P nif,t found at mould be authorized under thy. terms +'� , an existing nationwide z. er 33 CFE. 330, Appendix A, Section B. NO26. However, water quality certification from O',:egon Department of Eniironmei,tal Quality (DEQ) has not issued for this tationwide permit. Therefore, we cannot authorize the propoP'ed work until water quality certification is granted by DEQ.. Water quality 6 ;rt,&fication for you't proposed work will be considered Oregon Department of Environmental Quality ATTN Ms. Dana Siegfried 811 SW, Sixth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 -5694 BY co py _ . of this letter, we are x otif y in g DEQ of your ur proposed wort When water quality certification has o een issued o Waived, . � provide a co py, along with an y im posed conditions, to this office. If the Conditions of the concurrence are considered appropriate for inclusion pin ur permit authorization we will p rovide verification that the proposed is authorized. by: 1Cn4 ddi tiotL out .must ab tain oz', ariul tor permits where , reputred undcm, grsz4n'.s 14, emiov lLtii? Law and approp. iate lacA► ti nations . if you have any questions' regarding our nationwide permit autho'rity, '. please contact me a1 the above; address or telephone (503) 326,6996. Sincerely, Dale'. 110.s:.em Project Mana ,;era Regulatory/ and E viro:viiental' Resourcia Branch Copies Furnished: DSL DEQ w /AFplioat on Envi.roscience, Inc Ron Rathburn r' .k. . • U S Army Corp: of IE>r sgineees Portland Distract • pm* JOINT PERMT APPUCAT1O' This oNPPOCAIION VALL MEET 1HE RE ME FORM O 8O1H AGENCIES tParats,! u° N-K[; ' .ERs' Corps Action ID Number_ Dote Received Oregon Date Rec r District Engineer AEN: CENPP- 0E•RP P 0 Box 296 Portland. OR 97203-2946 13/326 -7730 Immintommolorronsienwomi iD App lcorlt Name 1 i Wa,ver1Y CUnstruot3.vh ComPany and Address 9130 SW, Pioneer Court Ste E Wilsonville, OR 97070 vo • 2 1.8 !vision of State Lands Number gyred ffD Authoriz'd Agent ' Mr. Ron Rat burn 0 Contrrat:, ENVIROSCIENCE, INC. Nome and Address 1201 S.W. 12th Avenue, Ste 410 Property Owner (if different than applicant) Name and Address 0 Street, Road or otl cr descriptive location South. of SW D tharr load , Bebteet SW 85th In or Near (City Town) Tigard PROJECT Look to SW 92nd AVe && State of Oregon Division of Stake Lands 775 Summer Street NE Sltem OR 97311: 503/378 .3805 business phone # 694-5505 home phone business phone #241-037 home phone # business phone # home phone Le cal Descri.tion • Water* 4ay County Washington River Mile QU. er Tac iM l alituae Section Township 14 2 South Tax Lot Longitude Range 1 West Is consent to enter property gronted to the Corps old the Divtsien oi U. ate Lands? 0 Yes PooposEb PRO r boo I i-°fivity Type: CD Fill 0 Excavation (removal) kJ 1'1)-Water SI lure Development Gf a residential. area with a Brief Description: Fitt will involve 1 __ cubic yards onnueil y r ndior i Fill will be 0 Riprcr0 (0 Bock 0 Gravel �, th• Sand b�A iAIION attire 0 Maim ain/Ktoptair on � E>isting struo tocIated vetland mitigation �., curio yards for the total project Silk 0 clay 40 Organics 0 other U d la Acres; �� C 1 length: ° width; „ depth Fri lrr►pacf Area is �.,..__.___�_��.. Removal will cubic vomit dally anal /o: ,a6. .... „ cubic yordd for the total project Renrt i►vat vvlll be 0 Riprap 0 l7oct 0 Gravel ttio chsiit 0 geiv C g tics 0 Other tleitthotit 1stocict Area is Acres ,�. r . length: width: depth Nit-hNit-hotted $4a+ Date Estitated Compbil ri bate enter W&landl o ct rw '? yos No U1il) one rnateel:�l, aaa►hstr�dt;tiorn ciebrw; r� ©ft. etc:. _ �1 it yes, describe the tiip See a! ;r�chcnen ,. ate Vflcrr�. 5 , ... _ .. � ®cif dEsch�irge and sta'ow the tilt-charge locatt� � orU the iI ' lEN ,Afnic .oar / Cc►urm P�►ranttt�a�: �'EpA AvtT (10 be completed by local plan 'n official) °This protect is not regulated by the local comprehensive plain and ze ning ordinance. Ones projek. nos been reviewed and is consistent with th eiocalco m. ehensive plan and zoning ordinance. is Oihis project ion been reviewed and is not consistent with the local a omprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. Consistency of this project with the local planning ordinance cann t be determined until the following local approval(s) are obtained: Approval ()Conditional Use App l 0 Development Permit ° Elan Amendment Zone Change Other, ?+► sP_ rJ 3piicatton )4 has 0 h .$ not been made for local * • prowls checked obave. I. r/ Signature (of local ping official) Tatirs City aunty COASTAL ZONE Cu ' t ic iiou Date If the proposed activity described in your permit applicatio is within the Oregon coastal zone. the following certification is required before your application can be processed. public notice will be issued with the certification statement which will be forwarded to ® e gee o Coastal nt of Land, d c' servation and Development for its concurrence or objection. For additional Information g o .. _ a e rnen t Program, contact the department at 1 175 1� Court Street N5, Salem, Oregon 97310 or call 503/373.00$ Certification Stoiarrne t . 3100 t certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: the pro with the approved Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program an program, osed activity described in this application corriplies will be completed in a manner consistent with the (pate SSIGNa TURF cOtt Joi P cA1IOPI .. that I am familiar* lhk) er,�,.w►natiort cc, irained in ppp .. . .. .. °. laed herein,: t cwartrf; cr,;axi fat® rznr� o� ^alrafie� i �.att.e Ircaciioin i3 hereby' ces�de for` 1ha3 �oof�vrliwes dine arid belief, thlsinfort7rti� lion is trua'�� P \ ..r rdgrti6y th .t�.. s ®s5 the authorit to Undertake t e p oposed aciivatoes, I Url ets e g _ perm" 0-1# loci the ptic®tion. and to the bast of k o e d federal d encies does root re_ lease n e from the re Wement of fdr ing the permits requested before county, st®te t �i ... ' - c .l.pe ts may be u'e 'red before the state rernovoft•t'rii elf is 'qt�e�d, carnrn�en�.fn® thQ jpro>act� understcrr'ect that to al rmf g understand that payment of the required state processing tee does if udrontee p+orrnit issuance. -- pelcorot sure certify that 1 May act the duly authorfto ztd agent of the e yitrccrt- 'Uthott d Ageft l . r .'. recto r: PiPA'OSED PROJECT P'IMPOS & D rclect Purpose and Need: Development of a residential area south of Tigard High of the site. The development of this site will require date an a �ss road into the residential Community and 41e c Description: 1. A wetland delineation and preliminary mitigation co (see att acb ent foar' details) 2. offset the wtland loss that is regaari :ed for the the develop entr a mitigation plan has been developed ( ing objectives: that '�'i w - Great will replace the structure . will be impacted. .:. Create a drainage Swale and water reten'i:ior1 basin provide additional relief from runoff. - Enhance the existing scrub-scrub wetland through in the flood plain. low many project drawing stvi.efs ore included with this application? MOTE A complete application must include drawings and a location reas ubr iitte c on seporcrfo 812 Y 91 sheets. i hor l and along the northern boundar the filling of 0015 acmes to :a assn Ciated wetland mitigation- ept 'P1 an of the site was per firmed onstruCtion of ani.access roadway in e figures 5 and 6) i'ith the follow nd function • of the wetland area that to augment the existing area and emcamal of Himalayan blackberry vines PROJECT 9MPACTLAND Aa�l Describe alternative s €tes and project designs + iot were con leered to No alternative site were consid :red in this evaluatio figuration property. it ial evaluation of f i ,rattan of the �,n initial resulted in: 1. a reduction in the number of storm dr 2 the development of rock d3.Ssipater s t • redesign of the storm drainage line t wetlands and . the inclusion of additional storm dra area • • Describe what meextres you will use (before and after construction) to rn+ we will be mi nllni zing impacts to the wetland during can Mitigation plan develops into a viable wetland by: I. Fl.acing Mat8 under heavyeciuipa; ent in order to preVen 2. tnstaning silt fences where ntccessary along the bra men : area and delineated wetland , tc,, prevent transport c 3. Excavation and planting of the ;,area will be managed protect the existing wetland and validate the planting be dinated with a lr �mdsc a architet t', who i,*ould pr to assist in the final desig n the Wetland a ritigatie would be performed arii core otiors instituted as re�a it (Continkted.,) MOTE: if necessary, Use additional sheets, id impacts to the woiarritiy or wetland. due to th limibted size and con- esign impacts! to the existing wetlan ins intersecting the prortyp ► minifrhiEe site erosion avoid transacting the southtlrly ne to maintain the '.>ret'is)nd mitigatao • unite irnpc4cts to the waterwca or we and. truction and E:�sur 1r_g that the Sinking caused by coy:!` ntrated load ndary between the proposed develop sediment. by a qualified wetland biologist to ocedures: This latter work would pare a ltladsOape Or planting plan dd . eit this. /A phase.. a periodic evaldatiof d t4 adhere to the proposed Dian WilsaitiANEOUS INFORM% Adjoining Properly Owners and 'Their Addresses and Phone Numbers l'igard High Sdhoo9. Charles & Za[ a A: Laub 9000 8W ] irham Toad Tigard ► OR 684-2255 list on other a provnis or' crOiticates r �,�elvede oppled for, or dented thud ore related to this applicb ion. lsvuing Agency Type of Approval Identification t+bUrnber Dotes of 0121011coMon / Approval / Denial & binder 0 Gray, W 1 CO tr V Pt. MENTAL Wes, 1D iMPi Ct ,iNF aft WEILMD Fus Orav) Site Conditions of impact area Irmpaact area at 0 Ocean 0 Estuary 0 River 0 Lake Note: Estuarlan Resource Replacement is required byv'st; rte law for prole seperate Wetlands Resource Cornrpaation Pior3 may be appended t leas a wetland delineation been completed tor this site? if yes, by whi Ron Rathburn vironScience, i i and bioiagico6 chc uoacter of the well ��;scr'�s�� t9ha� existing 6�ysrccR re,q/Urae a separate sheets and photos. if necessary) See a ttacheant "Results and Discu ,sion" RMATioti Stream FresNdOter 1Nr- .tlaaa d kwoluing intertidal or tidal mrarsh vitwoiians. e appk'Cattion. 0 to a/w terwoy site by area and type of Resource Replacement Mitigation unavoidably irrip�ctecf wets rmp.resa ices 5e a functional b`vealcuesnof replace eated wetland 'basin Iould ancluae sedum t collection, biofilteri.ng ~of stone rater drainage, flood' control level of adjacent development, the babi tat value of moderate importance. The removal of 0.15 acres of and and soil along the dra m may. mane i he� existing hydrology. Primary impaOts ' - ... � �fgetation with the brada-off o and creation of additional vetland to provide plain. The planting sdhedUle g or this project l preparation has been completed according to the p r_�sa Sealy anticipated that the shrubs will be planted cover seeding to occur in early November. If rev will be applied daring the Springs g proposed - e protect the d A monitoring 'program is '� ptc�tect :tigation plan de.ape into a viaatl anal details) and groundwater recharge. 'Due to the ' etlsnd is considered to be of wetland ,Tong a drainage chorine), will soli. the area will be cuivert"ed $ uld be associated vith the ani� ial lo, s' enhanrim a previously impdcteel area ncreased biof i l taring Vithin a aood- talrence atte e` etctritaticn and sit+ oposed mit;igatitin plan Tit is prey in O obor with t'ho initI41 ground »- .tear a Second riti1ttitre of grotandcOver .._ loPtient objectives and &Wird t;fAt: t section 5 Of time application for ~lose this infc►rrrIaaf6 � � coirOlet� %�apiitr~stli :. ray si'r�fi !tom het a�ci a►�aer arr�rd�raj r ntd iht nation diet, r av itt yo 'p "otiOit boammailismtioxianwutiaimeitiiiiai 1d it g, 'placed -.�t the r_.n construction along with the lit fencing used, it f bottom of the steep bank, stew covering seasonal, the bank will . be .vegetated �' Siltation pom % c l be i d eis 'Ord aina�ge s t o cre&(.�, in��a�.l�dl on : existing '�rz'��x�.� l t-rer construction all inlets a.. 11 ily /Waste type w . Lh sediment traps , ;h y + ,• �•.. ' � f x, •,,.14, b ':� 0'r, .�`'t rte► • �'' i * ,y„ ;1.+i : IT , 4*. .`s" far► `'�" . ., "o,•� ......._ a 4 rf?,i-r:ii, 7.. .,' 414 r " . '• .•... .AD. . tl z.t3Y 4. ' t '•" /'J - ....pr 4 -- � � ,, �_ v.: .... ,.1 ` u�. . . diLit"" +'r.'LS •...'y, .. .. �.. A"'.Y:.:�- '.TST. C'L�^"SL .��: Vii. ..h__ -... ,. _1 ... ,. _.r,u ._ �'C6.T7�.1..4ir ..,•■•■■■=wam io. moMONOmar.1: •■ Ow ■va •aftimme •■■ Ama.:■■mo.az,!,,mrssr.- 1 ru» w �.r•140. Mr. getversdorff, Here 'is the documentation to supplQment what `was .,said' at the haring on March 30th acid additional recommendations froni Friends of Cock Park. Please forward to the hearings office'', 4Mr. Epstein, for review, 1, look forward to continued c.ontact with you. Response to Staff Report City of Tigard, Oregon March 3Q,'993 Friends of Cook Park; l Wetlands impact Statement 'quest that we are given tine to find an alternative source to .issue a Ptatement. 2 • Buffer of trees and fence between property and wetlands. In addition to the 25 foot buffer that is standard • s • constructed requ.��ren�ee�nt, we are requesting fence c® to protect the wetlands. *Refer to Corp of Engineers Report. 3 • Follow Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities. This should be located where lots 20 and 21 are proposed otherwise have soap suds, oil and needles d ai i g into wetlands. d rpap se no fee in leu of water qualAty facility. 4 • Clarify what is meant by a temporary turn around at the end of the "temporary" dead end e fire street. . 'h access road is unclear and needs to be reviewed .The by the TuaIitin Valley Fire District for ,approval. _. 5. Review of proposed grading plans in areas with greater than a 25 percent slope. �, have ninnt inventory soil : from the i have requested a �evelopnn conservation service and am waiting for their rep�;�rt. t requtin that this report be incJuded 1 � requesting in our response when it is issued: * and comment on the - r will provide expert advice ce. a *This ova impact the development will have on the soil. . i , y , � the issue of r,� °osron which Specaf,�call!,r gt will address � r of II-�13 is in line with Tigard 's Comprehensive P1a.h page i t edn 2 6: Ensure permits from the Division of State E �gineeirs are obtained. Lands and Corps of This is a standard regmlrement and we Want a▪ t on record 'i:hat. these permits be obitaiFled per our request. 7: Tree removal permit obtained That includes a tree survey identifying trees over"' 6 inches in diameter and justification for removal . Requesting that maniei al tree reMoval be ed ante this sdbdivision and that additional trees be planted to provic1 . park and $tie twreeta the a buffer be develop nen. Alsc , identify lot placements grotfind the trees, to retain more trees, This is in line with City. of Tigard`s policy 3.4.2 that development proposals do not substantial i alter the character of the trees or major vegetation. Sanitary sewer designed to avoid wetland/ sensitive land crossings. This is a recommendation from the Unified Sewerage Agency that has reviewed this development and we are in agreement with them. 9. Buffer /fiance between development and Thomas Dairy. Friends of Cook Park value the positive influence the Thomas..,, Dairy has on the park and request a fence be placed as a matter of safety. *Tasked with Frank Hodap w works for the school district r that y h� aror� n ,. t he indicated ta Eft. wi1l be bail and cyclone one., fence between the proposed development and the High School *The purpose of the fence is to protect the property owners and the school from potential problems *We propose that a fence be :.o nstructed for the same reasons. ALSO WANT TO NOTE UNDER THE COMMUNITY ')EVELOFMENT ORDINANCE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY,PEOPLE IN NEWER DEVELOPMENTS H SIGN WAIVERS (NON -REMONSTRANCE) THAT GIVE UP THE I RL I AVE TO GP - J Y N TO THE CITY �� r I �TE F1. (TALKED TO _._ ALSO, THE IS REQUIRED TO PUT �A�NOTICE UP ON THE PROPERTY THAT THERE ARE SMELL, NOISE AND FLY LIMITATIONS. WE REQUEST THAT THIS BE NOTED ALSO. JO, Stream al lowed to flow naturally into • s. Ales: ass II perineal .ttiOaift flows through this property; need clari ficat,i;oa' of the staff report. • • * This; stream pravide •natural filtration for the ceetiands a04 the road should be adjusted accord hgly to i ,low•• • tnatu a1 -fIo We.'foo6litliend that the streanc not be pi ed) • Addtional kccoto endatiot S .April $4 1993' . The road that en ersj the property. be ad1usted so that lots 1 and 2 be removed dt�d the road curve aaeound to avoid the • s t r earns. • A Y s lands• of trees be.red hetweetn lots 1.�1 dnd 24 on dent• Also leave island of trees on the side streets oyd co rt atnd Tyrone Courtp Please refer to Genesis Loop iri Tigard that has ekist1ng islands - trees c cor iiin g th6 pans the .Friends o Cook Park have water line and the ��. �wwould line would go a°eva.ewe�� directl'y 'tort ught to the wetlands o,, Even though an existin „1§ewer line exists in the wetIndst we recommend that ari eltrnative rctit0 be explored to avoid ' he wetlands �oM19,letejy. These wetlands have alreadY been enhanced Azad i$ a und- Ott this area again would cause more c lsturbaMyMe o the p .,an ts aP4 wi ldl 4fe. The report from the school diatrict indicated that the school's' In the area are already at ful'l.• capacity Most of us who have children at Durham school , which would serve this development, are w el / aware of the overcrowdin,1 that has occur ed. We would ' r e %aotnend . fthat the size of the development be reduced by at least 1$ lots to account for this. The lots removed would include ,2,1,17,18,19,20, �y Remote Z. , 29 9 30 i .36 37 A, 9 and 40 . u1 of. these lots would also ►ccornpl ish the following: and development. farm and development , A, Provide good buffer between park an B Provide buffer between fa C. Avoid removal of established ,trees . Avoid' extreiie disturbance of stream. April 2 1993 Bill Parks Division of State Lands 775 N. Summer Salem, OR 97310 Re SUBDIVISION SUB 93-0007 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR 93 -0004 GRAY /LAMB /WAYMIR,E (.n Tigard) Dear Mx. Parks: RECEIVED APB 5 1993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT We, the board members of Tigard's Neighborhood Planning Organization #6 (NPo #6), have questions and concetns about the above referenced subdivision curreitly under consideration by Tigard's Hearings Officer. The following issues are of equal concern to us. 1. SLOPE How will soil erosion be controlled? What effect will the development have on water purity, natural seepage, natural springs and hydrostatic water that currently flows to the wetlands? Is the 25' buffer shown on the applicant's Plan sufficient spacing between the southern most lots and the wetlands? Is it adequate for erosion control? Will permanent fencing be installed the entire length of the subdivision along the wetlands togive it further protection. 2. WATER QUALITY FACILITY The applicant has applied for a "fee in lieu of" constructing a water quality facility. The City of Tigard has recommended this not be granted and we agree. We fieel this facility is mandatory for this site and hope that it is adequate to hold excess runoff to buffer adjacent properties from flooding. Our board was told that right now after a good rain the water gathers in the southeast corner of the wet /ands and is level with existing 'drainage ways that abut the Thomas dairy to the east and Cook Park to the south. So what will be the impact of the runoff from the paved surfaces in this development to the wetl rids TREES How accurate is the applicant's tree survey? We would rather see an independent tree survey made. Are, there any historical trees on this site The applicant states that the impact on trees during development will be minimal Even if true all you need to do is' overlay spar on t e. becomes very ob,viouspthat many, many trees will have ntoabe removed if lots are to be built on. See lots 13, 44, 45 and 43 to name but a few, As these trees are removed during individual lot development will the soil stability be further coml.'roiised7' a' ETLA ID$/ L(1ODtLAXN : Does the Division of State Lands confirm n applicant's weal nd surtr : '`� Doe: part of this subdivision a^ the 100 years f l ood p 1 a4 n? 'We, have heard .. cc of l i cting reports, 5 ROADS Y � i,)uld the roadway into the subd].visi.on be rec nfigured so that, the existing drainage .way ( vine) is left intact? 4 ' 1 w1flDLIFE' We request that a Fish & Wildlife representative survey this area. Our :'bottom line concern is Can thiv development be constructed without producing unstable soils and daMaging the wetlands even when follov$i4g City and State Engineering guidelines?" NPO *6 would appreciate your consilf desati c, n of our coicerns listed above as You walk the site. Su(tt Carver chair of N ?0 *6 1C155 2W Iioodview Drive Tigard, ©1 97224 THOUGHTS ON 93- 0007/93 -0004 L. . �' topography, y proximity entire subdivision ,�e.:amrs� of to o � h , and . rn►�urna $ a wetlands, on the north should be reconfigured into approx. 20 lots with p bouudry of the property. The south boundry should have a 50.foot buffer including wetlands to protect natural habitat and conformity with aaljacent !property. 2 No " fee in lieu /0 is acceptable for ground water run-off. A water pur- ification sy tem must be includ ,d into the subdivision. 3. A left turn lane onto Kent Dr,. firorn southbound 92nd is necessary because the turn right will be made ri wi at the crest of g a hill. 'Also, 92nd should be given additional shoulder width at this intersection. m>veibgt. r l 4. The developer is p proposing ... 47 lots. Given what I see of the city's 's enforcement of developer P g �' tree cutting permit system and the small lot size.,. it's obvious that every tree that is now on the property will be removed for development. House footprints fitted on these small lot can only mean that the trees go bye -bye. Lowering hot density to 20 Rots or changing zoning to a more appropriate R -3.5 would create a subdivision that more confonus <to the surrounding area. This property should never have been zoned R -12. 5 The 20 foot wide path from the northeast corner of this sObdivision to 85th can y . : high. isen and littering. only increase the exposure ff"or adjacent land owners tr� �antd�'i . . The potential for economic harm is very high. Is the developer willing to except liability for problems caused by this improvement? 6. Remove the potential of the " W o o p s factor ". Develop ers eons d s tently make promise s u p front in planning new subdivision that never seem to moke it to the finished product. � Any trees cot in excess of those identified and agreed P' y � upon or any damaga done by filling to the wetlands should be cause for severe penalty. Woops is not an excuse that is acceptable. 7. If this subdivision is done corerectly(not just legally), it will probable be eco- nomically non-viable. - nomicall: dust because yob can legally do something dosen°t mean it is in the best interest of the area to do so: Mr. Waymire is gameblii g with his money and our community. 8 How would this area look with a developed aced no homes beg buiQt. Pretty barren i my mid the possibility is very real. No trees, No wetlands, Who needs ... . NUM no buffl'ersa ds a�'.,,.o EKMAN BOWERSOX 'ATTORNEYS At LAW JEFFREY A SOWERSOY 050 LINCOLN TOWER DONALD N. ti.KMAN 10260 S.W. OREEN8UP-3 ROAD MARK O. COTTLE PORTLAND ORE ON 97223 GREGORY C. ""dwtON' (503)452 °58'98. 'FAX i5O3)452 -56ti97 *At3.ti A6M17TED'IN•CAL:IFQII4,HIA • City of Tigard Att; Mr. Rewersdor f - Planning 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 • Greetings: This is an addendum to my open letter pre sented at the hearing rega`c.° ing the Application of Waymire 93 -0007 /SLR 93 -0004. There are several issues that needs to be raised: 1 At the hearing, the, Hearing Officer indicated that encasing the drainageway may be the only aeons available in orderr to adequately develop the property even if doing so may interfere with the natural dr ainage of the area. There are other options: a) Put a bridge over the drainageway although more expen,Five, it would maximize the natural drainage area and require less land alteration, preserve the natural 510 "� le5 area to a greater extent and create less erosion. . A bridge would more fully comply with Ana. 18.84, 040: q roadway missing the b) Require the entrance r�adwa. � to come in further north thereby to majority of the drainage area. Some other conditions that would be deemed .. a pP p A`p elate are: 2 Require the water quality facility to be placed between the subdivision and farm. This will provide a safety buffei between the farm and the subdivi %non.. fE $ tea smittai enema 1 N e ias a► m nom Co Co Dept: Phone 3. Require eightafoot fence to be put between the faun and the s ibdivision. ere is :,a safety concern f or both the farm and the subdivision. lo b'!ivision a n Require a dr�nageway to be played along the s� � and farm's common b ,�unda,�y aline so as to ensure that there will not off.: site effects or hazards" to tb' farm property, from 'the drainage of additional water from the development. Require all trees and natural vegetation that are removed to be replanted in a natural area next to, the farm. The natural area could serve as the backyard of homes, but could not be altered by the homeowne s maximizin ,, and y r�. u , � the.. l�,r�t use a� Maintaining adequate wildlife habitat, traffic impact statement regarding 1e increased vol 6. Require a tra volume to the existing streets, and the proposed expansion onto 85th. The traffic impact statement should review all intersections on Dunham that would be effected. The above conditions along with those proposed in my first letter; would more fully fy p 9 safety taken sate the requirement of 1�.g4:4�o as well as provide adequate safe measures to be to ensure the safety of the citizen's of the new develops e'it Very truly your Mark 0 . Cottle 4 A, IC,47 T FOR ANTS voluirogemionsimor DATE: ,arch 41993 PROW: Tigard Planning Department Rs 8 VISION SIB 93 f�}�•. ♦ �► �S -q�s SLR ..930004 fxav 'L OMO i��llw7i� � �e�:rrti�ii.G�inr .��.�r�.oi w..�on.a WAYNIRS (NPO #6) The - enplicant sregueaa!ts preliminary Subdivision pleat approval to divide approsietetely 7.5 scree* into 49 lots ranging in Seize teem 4,000 to 12,000 square feat In size. Sensitive La _ Review apprr el is else requested te drainagewa p and wetlands modifications. • AMICABLE Klima s 'tl ha Community Development Code Chaptere 18.54, 1C.84, 10.88, 10.92, 18.100, 18.102, 15.15 io 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 7.6.3., 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. lteareATION: A portion of the land on SW Stand Aveaee between Tigard High School and Cook Park ('i1'!°:°TM 281 14A,, t *ac lets 100 & 1000) ZONE: R-12 (Residential, 12 unite /acre) The R -12 zone allows singlcfsmily detached or attar-lied residential unite, duplex and s elitple- family residential t unite, zeaidential care facilities, public support services, manufactured h ae s, family day care, home occuapati on, , and a e�eao structures among othor uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From �� report ea and from other information avae.ilaafisle to our various departmental and g PP gaff, a re rt and recoendation will, be pre out' �'L4 prepared decision and a the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on thi application, ication, we need your u nto by HEW.. 15, 1992. You may use the = pace provided below or attach a separate letter to return your cite. if jiobelow a iun,ab lle to rata ahove date,. please phone the staff contact, n it y ur comments and confirm your comments in writing ae soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard 639-4171. an , Tigard, R 97223. Pi s Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SU Sail. 1B1vd. STAFF CONTACT. Ron Pomeroy, __ PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOW/N 3 ITEMS THAT APPLY: eafflosamemi -, We have reviewed the proposal oposal and have no oh„ actions to it. Please contact of our office. isrloormarame Please refer to the enclosed letter. er. "Written Co ner*: ;® r ev ran _ ,,� �" " E"'�- '9L,.� h�% ....�.,.� 1 9- '"�'" d '� 14- `�la�A �:U}�Ie•�C11rYO�V .. ' f `r�4sY'..� Naitie oaf Per ran C 01U: ? s Phone Nunther: b ,vim � 4 rrrr .o�+.w`ioirm b Ir 0-*A.,:01.0 ; ' t. ,P e'• �1 `' 41 $GSORBO0D PLANNING ORGAWIZATIJIP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CBECKLX1 T NPO # FILE VO: SUB 93.- 0007/ELR 93 -0004 FILE TITLE: Gray-Lamb/Waymire APPLICANT: Kenneth Waymire 31835 SW Country View La? Wilsonville, OR 9707 OWJ 2 s R.. A. and Linda D. Gray PO Box 1016 herwood, OR 97140 AGENT: Dennis SMit'h Lla:yrbh' est Civil Deeia n, Inc. 9 `.30 SW Pioneer Couvt, Suite E Wiloos.Yville, OR 97070 Charles & Zada Lamb 13770 SW Fern Tigard, OR 97223 g:4: ool District 23 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: stumnimm,0007 AE II TiVE moss ._...�9..�3-0._004 .E E',?t9t (N E0 #6) The applicant requests, prnliminary Sui,av .aion plat approva to divide approximately 7.5 acres intr 4 . Kate ranging in atae trom 4`000 to 12,000 square feet in 0'., J. [tensitive Lands RevIew app °r:ucal ie also reauasted to allow drtfna gwaY and w ®� , ands cif icationj ,APPLICABLE RY,,.' VIEW CYI V4RIA. Comug tukity Devetcnpwent Code Chapters 18.54, 10. "s4, 13.88,E X11 824.014 . 9 , 18.10U. 178.102, i f8 a102, 718.150, 1E.160, 8 at;d 18.164; �gCotaprehens�I.ve 1 Iran "i ®1 ^,ra.cies 3.1.1, `= .1.2, . 4. 4, 7.6.1, ., 8.1.1, and 8. 1, 3 . .LOCATION: A portion X9`1: tine land on SW 92nd Avenue between Tigard 11,4;s4i School avd Cook Park (WC . ?11 2S1 14A, tax lots 100 & 1000) Z ; E The R -12 zone l sincle- family detached or attached residential units, duple and mulitple,- ,-,'',ly resident anal units o residential cal :e facilities, public. sups c�!rt services, maxi factured hon�en, fig i1y day care, home occupations, and accessory strnctt e© among other u ses. Pl.eae reviw the attached development proposal s.>nd comment on those items lstod below which Concern the NPO regarding this application. This listing Le a template to aid d in your review of this proposal. Please let ups know he , you feel: about thit 0,svelopment taking plate in your portion of the City. Thank You. STAFF CONTACT: >v Ron P00er4y Si3ur �=a17'L., - OHI P ccesa To an From Site T c ffic Inpe.,;t Neighborhood Impact Environmental ? " : t ' Ei TS ° tj r r t 414' /11412L /kr 4). _e5.14.142.11.1 4 Z. 1 ♦, i .400 A of tee 'd e eatet, le ;fie, e-- - --Date: 1:441, ,frje • •M� 4 VED PLANNING MAR 1 7 1993 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY Maicch 16, 1993 Ron Pomeroy City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Ron; Subject:: Waverly. Estates I have nevi awed the plan for this project and would like to make the following sug estions a e qualty facility, designed to remove 65 perk e it L� the phos1 horous from the runoff from 100 percent. of the view nsed impervious surfac.*, should be installed. �►rop p ,r,o 'mot does not meet the criteria for aiiowigg fee in lieu of ry� a fac' " following + required with �.].ty. The facility: the information should , e re the plan for y a. Calculations of phosphorous removal. b. Landscape plan of facility. r a c. Maintenance plan of facility. fi1y . 4 .. analysis .. "� watershed to determine the . '.. �. � A hydrological cauta.a. f �l� of the wa 100 year storm on the downstream facilities should . . impact of a � be requited. 4 3 r25- ,u shall be contained in a The �,� fnoL undisturbed corridor ,. r.., t ....oatate from any lot and fenced. The water tray;.., se: � ' ,. f:il it cainnvtylie toith .n$th should undistur�b ;d Corridor tti quality f�... , unless additional buffer area is ;r.1..tir etede o Washington County Flood Plain Maps, f rps of gngineet maps and maps .. ... indicate elevation in the area ticx""�� all p. ofMP� xi rOj , �ct�dtocbee 126efeetoaboveyMean�Sea level: not 125 of this � as indi rated cn these prang. Does the City of Tigard have di. f fer.i:ng information? . Detail �drawi.ngs of !anholes o catch basins, backfill, etc,' have not been inclu, {ed with this `set of plans, catch basins shall have an 18-inch sump. 155 tea r#i, Fi`rs>t Aveii Suite 276 FF�O MS W3/1648-8621 bo'o, C3regbrr ?'G ,! FAX: 503/1L546-35$ Hillsboro, Ion 1Pomerolr. ` Tigard Waverly. Estates march 16g, 1993. Page Two • A. redesign of public storm lines will be necessary due to the water q4al ty facility rec *uiremer t. The existing plan does not provide for footing drainage for any of the lots. In particular lot), 24 through ao ,. 33, 34 and 43. A drainage plan is needed ahoWing that flow will be dissipated before leavf,r*g �a lot dischargin and roof drains to ,th Common tf�.�. �.ot r�hen d�.schar in � footing the • It looks like the sanitary sewer Could be designed so there, are not so many wetland /sensitive area crossings. The Agency would not approve the long laterals serving some of the lots. It looks questionable as to whether the lots on the south side of Kent Drive can be served by gravity based On the five foot contour lines. I hope theee comments are of value. If You havri ' any questions or comments, please call me Sincerely, eanne Hedrick Engineering Tech III /eb Enclosure • a F q • �4 4 ef. is -tee BESOILLIOLLI TO ;,� A ' �► . 4 ie,A i° DATE: FROM: Tigard Planning Departinfant e��7��eFtV.�� ;3 OII�Li01�i�•l4�Ml• /i•Y� $ " ... 9 -'0 q 1(i . '. , . y L' • i_ �► X ty;.. 8 9 .. a r'� ....SRI= LAMB .YID 1 ( ► 6) The ` applicant, requmilts preliminary $tb'.Ziviaion plat • from v4 �DOSI to 12,000 appro*tmately a.E acres into 49 l.Ote ranging in �� »�e�1� to divide �eana+�.,.3�ve Lands Rey 4 ,, square feet in sine. ,,.. view at a approval is also re/roasted to allow dra anage ay and wetlarais modifications. lL E REVIEW CRITERIA: unity Development Code • pt$'s3a54, 18.84, 14E a 88, 16. 92, 18. 100d 18.1A2 18. 150 * 18.160 A dnnd 18.164p Compretronsive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, slid 8,1..3. T. ►TION: A portion of the land on SW 92hd avenue between Tigard Sit J b School and Cook Park (WCTit 281 14A, tax lots 100 & 1000 ZONE: ,12 Residential, 12 units/acre) is /acre) 2Phe R-12 zone allows single - family detach. or atta ch :d residential unite dupl ex and mulitp1e- • y ,� � o residential y ftdilit ien, p lic euppart services manufactured homes, day ca.e, Invite occupations, and acaemeory structures among others usea. AttacheE4 is the Site Pim". and alplicant a ntvtement for your review. Trott inform tiofl supplied by vitriol:a de 3artmentn atd agenaien and frijol otha'c infformation, available to oi! r staff, a report Mad t ecommendation will be prepared and deciSien will be rendered on the p ,Lopo A+1 in the near future. If you wish to cow en* on this ol.pplicatioa, we need your et me by mr...L.120 19 ,,?,. You may we the spate provided below or attach a Oeparatit letter to return you coffeentil, w , bl to r/atgLo+ & the at+oe� er � .7. please phone the ®taff contact noted below w�- th y... . d Confirm yo+ar co aeflt�i in Writ ' +g as soon as possible. If you have any « uecltione regarding g .his matter, contact he Tigar�. your co�me,ate + Planning itteparti ent, PO Boat 23397, 13125 SW Sall. nib* , ° T t jard, OR 91223. PHONE .ww 639 - X4171. STAta C M TACT Romp ero, ,,. PLEASE CHEt4 THE POZIOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We hav�o reviewed the proposal and have no of je� e tionn to I. ,i.w' i t, CY- Vleane contact .�._...�... of our office. P1 ace refer to the enclosed letter. Written Commeai,ts u i rsee otomerl mom warmeas.....—.maleisorswininiiminiositingesosimeirribiffleiiir.41WA .. ... ... :tr VYweee0lgVell�fel�flsY"• Waiilersftionatimusiisoiiravimmocoavorwlaseknommumni i�ISrN /e1 L:ree�1l�� • _ ,•.�••� .. .eenrr,e.r egeelee•I YIY� O.Me.lee► Noti 3 f Person Cotiritentiiiitp Prtcri<:e Kftber 1993 fryy N+ • iiii6m1961121, • W. Northwest CIvii esi n iris. 9130 sN plower Curt. Suiiat lS4fd eAr mie, Oregon 97070 633 ! 6824687 City Of Tigard Planning Division 13125 S. W. Hall Poillevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Subject: Narrative For The Subdivision and Development Of Waverly Estates Located On The East Side Of S. W. 92nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon E „ ,ary 25, 1993 Project No. 92495 Lathes and 'Gentlemen We are proposing the subdivision raid development of the property en the east side of S. W. 92nd Avenue, between the High School and Cook Patti into medium density residential housing to the appropriate City standards. This project vaned 1112. A site development plan lia5 been compiled showing a project creating 49 residential lots. Lot sites vary from 4,445 square feet to 110,080 square feet. This site has an area of 11.12 acres with a developable area of 7.55 acres, It is our intent to . nnfigure the lots to provide a lot depth to width ode not exceeding 2.5 to 1 as rr quhed by City Code. , l Basic requirements for solar access are met by .. a�.� sots except lots 1, 18 throu gh 23, 28, 31, 36, 40, 46, and 47. PrateeZed solar building lines are to be applied to Lots 1, 28, 31, and 36. This results in a 83% compliance prescribed by City of Tigard design standard. A clear vision area will be provided at the street intersection with S. W. 92nd Avenue S. W. 92nd Avenue will Lave additional right-of-way dedicated to create a 30 foot wide right- of-way _way .. A half-street p �. g frontage of this project (S, W. j wA from centerline, street un rovetnent along the of 92nd Avenue) is planned to create a 20 foot wide street from centerline. On-site public street improvements (Kent Drive) are planned to create a 34 foot wide street within a 50 feet wide right -of -way. A 20 foot wide strip within a 50 fozxt wide right -of way will be dedicated and unproved for rare access as well as a pedestrian path to S. W. 87th Avenue. of our pre-applieation, we indicated design for public street access to lots with At the time of p ciroilar cul-de-sacs. The plan has been Modified to a private street concept with hminterheatis. The private streets will be designed to meet the require rents of City code to include a minimum of 24 feet of paved street with curbs on both sides and sidewalks on one side Domestic water and fire service will be supplied by uoni eeting to existing Tigard water District waterlines near this site with lire hydrants provided as designated by the Tualatin Fire and Rescue District: A sanitary sewer system will connect into existing 12" ity of sewer system near the southern boundary of this pro stet. As part of the purchase agreement on this property, storm water runoff will be allowed onto the property to the south of this project., This nmoff will be aged such that the quality of wetland areas will be maintained. �, � 1 t': steep and a site "� � elopes; wetlands, flood plain, anri heavy e +co: portions , we �..� cover +Qn oi�loitss of the ,��_,� feel it is impractical to construct a water quali'�ty sw ie ,facility: We are requesting to pay the "fee in lieu of" due to these issues: q during pre-application oc a i(ding that a lot e As requested dura�n the pa, gat is our and rst��, his agreement. adjustment and minor partition map yvill be bract by Mr. Gray as , of fir. We have adjusted the prelh nary plat boundary to accommodate the lot line adjustment and niinor partition rna p. . We have submitted as part of this app lieation preliminary ma p s showin g how Mr: Gray's surveyor will accomplish their work. • Relative to Cede 18.84:040 Approval Standards Section (B) we ask that the application be approved for a sensitive lands permit for this site which includes areas with. slopes greater than 25 percent based on the followin g � development crit,,.ria The plan is intended to include provisions for constructing adequate access for hamesite,s and will not create site disturbances h greater L the site • :. p. slopes greater to �a extent re�►t.�r than that required. 'Areas of the site which are o�,�at led � slo s r tlhan 25 percent are indicated on the enclosed "Preliminary Subdivision Plat, Slieet 3 '%: Provisions will also be implemented to address erosion, stream sedimentation, ground , property. any instability, or other adverse onr�sit�� aiad� off-site effects or hazards to life or If an wet sail conditions, high water table, high shrink-swell soils, compressible /organic soils, or ahallow bedrock are encountered at this site, appropriate geotechnical input will be included for this project. Where nittural vegetation is removed as part of this development, it will be replanted in accordance with( Chapter 15.100. Relative to Code 18 .040 Approv a1 Standards Section (C) we ask . that the application be R. licatioh( approved for a sensitive lauds permit for this site w ech includes existing drainageways based on the following: As indicated above, the proceed development will be designed in a manner which nairthrlizes site dist'.trbances and addresses erosion, sedimentation, ground instability or other adverse on -site a � a n d of, -. si t e ,:.e. f, e` cc ts or ha, a. d,.., s to life o, r pkoperty � Y by appropriate riate meanw s: The water flow capacity of the drai nage ay will not be decreased by this ro � ct: Erosion control measures will be implemented in ar eas wh ere natural vegetation w ill be removed in accordance with Chapter 15:100 the drainageways will be replaced by a public utility designed to accommodate �,. :,.h the adopted Master flow in accordance with the a opted Oregon $ laaiid maximum fl Draina a Plan. The necessary i . o :.. _� State of �..: g wry . U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Board, Ili% sion of State Lands approvals will be obtained for this our ' s project. It is _.: t(_rthwa�°1 'esigno In understanding that recent negotiations with the southerly property owner;,Mr. Robert Gra y, to adjust the common property boundary have resulted ' in adequate 9pen land area and suitable area for a destrian/bic, s 1e path within Mr. (Jr/ales property. In addition, we.understand that the required inahitenance - access roads . with the proposed public eeasements . will be eonstrsucted on Mr. Grays property: As requested during the pm-application conference, we have enclosed the a reepaent between the subject pxoperty owners relating to sterna drainage easements and surface runoff to the southerly poperty. Relative to Code 18.84.040 Approval Standards St lards Section (C) we ask t the appli cation aation approved for a sensitive lands permit within wetlands based on tiLe fo)slowing criteria: A 25 foot setback will be maintained along the northerly boundary of the wetland as shown on the eneltised "Preliminary Subdivision Plat", Sheet 3. The requital Division to t.� Ste Lands wetland till permit will also be applied for Is part of project. The project will he designed its such a manner as to .....'size site disturbances as indicated above. Any encroachment or charge in on-site or off ss t drainage which would impact wetland chr cteristis will be project (see enclosed Wetland Delineaticin iti . 'g part pro ,� : .: ataon Reports). r,�...altedi: as ark of the p mitigated : site according to �,.hapxer 18.100. To Erosion control measures will be implemented at this s�, ,. knowledge, requirements chapter will be met. The gre�n�nts �of this c of project will o� .: all other sensitive lands ry � will also be met. Design provisions of Chapter 18.150, Thee Removal, wards flood plain, and wards , ► • , satisfy the physical limitation and natural h p , natural areas, parks, p space ,policies and arrlc�, recreat�� and open a� nliczes of the Comprehensive lP1an. It should also be stated that this development will help to .alleviate some of the need, for additiorl housing in the area and will provide prime access for families to existing educational and park facilities closeby. Sincerely NORTHWEST CIVIL DESIGN, INC. ter 's D. S.unith, President Engineering Manager �IaSlvi Enclosutes» loriI* st civil DOS n, w SEE 2S !31' l) MVN diVAVOL mower SAI DUNHAM' ROAD 11.1 d • . . • t 000 r fiOdixy/pte-ptY--- �t{ NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZAtION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST,/ NPO ' _ 6 Minor Iatimid . Partition MLP 93 -0003 Applicant Charles and. Zada Gray Land Owners: Tax lot 100 School District Tax lost 1000 Joint ownership - awl 233 Charles and Zada Lea R.A. and Linda Gray Rgque.;ste Zone • _ Lacat;. Q p The app .ic nt ;requests approval of a M :,nor Land Partition to divide one parcel of 32424 acres into two P' .pp y f . • m 7 in, si ie v The Cit . ,is arce�.ss of a rox�.�atel � 5 and 24 �� acres �' also currently 1y processinC a Lot Line Ad ju ot1ent between tax lots ., (see enclose', ma which will make this Minor Land Parition 1000 osssible Thy zone I � R-4.5 for the Tigard High 6c:nocl property and, Ry-12 for the tax lot to the south ( tax lot 1000). Please review the attached development • rropo ''al . and comment on those items listed below whit , concern(S) this NPO regarding this a ppli (T acion This li.n g is a template � ` ` y� u review of this proposal. Please let us know h4 � you feel' about this development taking place in your ortiar, of the `cit y , Thank You' Fv Access To and From Site Traffic Impact Neighborhood Impact E' vtro imeIita1 Impact Est . /a) /6 ete:t? i o ,019, .�� ' 'gin I��i. • Signed Date: Stagy:., Contact: Rgn_Efamgggy..0 Assistant ,P :arms.. 635'-4171. � A • I v 6 to 110 a h DATE March 4 1993 FROMs Tigard Planning Department RB: fiEB.D , IS/ON SUB 93•aT0 SESI31c! �l1S FD s_Ni .Qi s Y- LAMB WAYM h applicant requests preliminary Subdivision plat divide a pp xo cy 7 eses into 40 lots ranging in sire from 4,000 to 12,000 square feet in size. Jensitive Lands 'Review approwa1 is also .requested to avow drainageway and wetlat nde ramifications. APPLICAOLE REVIM CRITEnIAs Community Development Code Charters 18.54, 18.84, 18.98, 18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 18.160, 18.16, and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: ' A portion of the land on SW 92nd Avenue between Tigard High School, and C¢ok liar) (WCT24 251 14A, tax lots 100 & 1000) ZONE: :t -12 (Residential, 12 units /acre) The R-12 EXAM a1lowa single - family detached or attached residential units, duplex and ma1itple family residentia l unity, ro idential care facilities, public support Vervicee,, manufactured homes, family day care, home omcupations, and accebsoxy* strsctureix among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement fcar your review. rrom information supplied by various departments a ui agencies and from echoer information avo;.iible to our staff, a report and reccnendaton will be prepared and a decision will be rendez:A on the proposal. in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comMentee by ll 45,, 19 . You may use t;; ;Ipace provided below or attach a eepu, i rage letter to return your commenta. If '�aable tea roppc ihe_ above 41.,aitst. ple ce 'phone the Staff contact noted regarding this matter, : contact as soon ors posy i�►l�lt►w�fiyou have � ®eta :e�tio>ra�sorfi� your comnerYta in writing the Tigard Y Planr t nig Department, PC Vox 23391, 13125 SW grill blvd., Tigard, 0:1, 97223. PEONS: 639- 4171. STAFF 0014TACTr, Ron .Pomeroy_____ PLEASE CHECX Try FC1,LOWIHG ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. amsamerferesn :60.1ie6rr.r. Please contact P1et a refer to the enclosed lcnattea±. Written Comments: yo�ti • NF'o /' of our office. In v/ r7 �Si. G . �,.�... Nf Co �y 81f ��1�. O.6': Person Go6.Dmm�i'�d3�tin zo Phone t> u, -irber (t) arr • Wetlands impact statement fir m an alternative source other than the dov"eloper, so an objective view point can * obtained. �i .d ti fee impact statement, to include Plan of how to maintain present wildlife. Development to occur upon the following conditions: A. Reduce number of houses to meet the recommended er i x9ria B. Homes tocaited west .ot. Thomas Dai r y will , have hmilgE of trees and gJ; . s- e • �. Provide A Buffer of, trees between development site to Protect create a buff'or between proposed s baeballwfieldssand and potential home. as D,. storm drains to drain into filtering system set up by the Unified Sewerage Agency prier to entering wetlands. E. Cul de 6ac no more than 00 feet lone. • Maintain all exiting streams and vegetation. No Placing streams in ,pipes • Eliminate alley sways (inlets) that are ' on a steep hill and extend into wetlands. This poses safety issues for fire and pedestrians that No fir trees over. a H. Limit number of elia�neteirRthat are cute six inches in `l"he dev�el ®per wi l aid °f in4ncial lY in ache development 4 a trax, l;rom -Cook park o 'Tualatin os►r . 0 Ices pons a to Development March 17,1991` Land East of 92nd Ave Tigard, Oregon After reviewing the site development plan for land east of 92nd avenue and north of Cook Park, the 'fallowing observations have been made: 1 According to Ti ard's comprehensive plan, on 'page 11-13 item number 1 indicates th at the city to control development so it does not adversely affect the floodplain and f;loodway t mite the run-off erosion impact r indicates a that development should 'min- imize on he surrounding area and downstream. * D Cfownstream from this area is an enhanced wetlands that will be affected adversely if large number of homes are allowed to be built there. In addition, in item number 3, retention of vegetative buffer along streams and draid ageways are to be emphasized to reduce runoff and flood damage. This also will pro+aid, erosion and iitation control. * With the present plan of 48 homes disturbing this area, it would be impossible to retain any vegetative buffer that would have substantial recoil For v-iktation control. . City of Tigard policy 3.2.3 item c. indicate that a buffer, either existing or planted, on the cos aercial or industrial velo y. Band' to screen cue pnnen�. from view is necessary. * Thiy land is directly viewable from a public park There- fore, a buffer cif trees should remain to decrease impact on the park, This could d not he accomplished with the 48 home development peoposal u. d City of A1 g�policy . y ., under the ;implementation nta rior strategies indicates that there exits large or unique stands of trees or major vegetation are within the planning Ares, the city shall ensure that development proposals do not substantially rater the !character of the vegetations The existing trees and vegetation will have t4 � altered to "fit" 48 homes in this area. • City of Tigard policy 3.$ u1r d,,efi' the Parks; recreation and open spaci�e indicate . _ .. .. �' Properly j�larnned that a and mans ged syste�i of open space can reduce the impact findings �. of rrbanizatloh and serve the leisure and aesthetic reeds of all residents. To have homes bordering the park in the manner .i .._� .'n' . • 11. n proposed i this develop 'lent are n t 1, i conjunction witai` the findings of this ' ;,o,@ icy Cook Park i.is 'DPI 04 t e last iew open spaces' iegt in . Tigard. We o�`�,e it, to, the Qy_Co uni tY o ,._ �_ _ this .. = dn�4 rat i o ns Y Storm L3rain4ge City Policy 7.1 2 indicates that a �7is condition tip development approval, is that natural drzmirAa ways be 'n t_in a'.ned` unless t b ni..t'ted studies show ` that alternative drainage solotior►; can solve on-site drainage` problems and will assure no adverse offigi, te impacts. The storml drains f-rom this' deve'opraent site Would drain direOtly i;rito, the wetlands below. Storth drains 6e k e ra ll � d ain run off fr' n the e The wetlands wo u l d he affected �ffdra�na�eafrcm washing cars, Painting, o i l s al o r any nu�be� of cau , ti c i t e s drain. into these areas, City ` Code i 8.164 O3O q K 1 determines the length of eui -de -sac should be no more that I) feet lone. 4 ' I t appears that this c evelo?Ment r'oul.d be longer than 400 feet. • Othlr t n ce$ s : A. gafotY: Roads s. e,re present/y nasn tnt zed with the amount of traffic along Durham, E.oad and 92nd' Ave. To add t •aff !c would not only affect the safety of regular commuters but also add congestion to a ' Tigard High school area. B. Wildlife: The land provides a habitat for many plants and animals. The streams support frogs, ; cra idads and other organisms which in turn support other wildlife in the area. e y development w:si take into consideration local ordinances and state statues protecting species, and the, res idual efect it would upoa the wildlife, a5 TOs • •F; BEQUEST FOR COMMENTS 1 TE',: rail 9 Fes* Tigard Planning Department 1a88D .V SIO i 0® 0 ES /I A_ MIS M,413 �fia LANS YZEE (IWO *6) The applicant requeets preliminary '7.5 ;area into 49 lots ranging, in plat approval to di�..i.de approximately :ercm�it;ive Lands Review size trt 4,000 to 12,000 ajia feet in maze. approval also requested Ito allow drainage way and wetlands modifications. APPIICASIA REVXU V 1T RXA Community De ,elopi a ,+t Code Chaptdmo 18.84, 18.C4, 18.88, 18.92, 1Et p 100, 18.102, 10 L50, 10.160, and 18.164; co p: ehon- ivo Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.40 7.6.1, 3.1.1, and 8m1.2. ' AT1 s A, portion of the land on SW 92nd Avenue between Tigard and High School and Ocrok Park (i C 1 2S1 14A, tax lots 100 & 1000 ZONE: R.'42 (R W i.dontia1, 12 units/acre) The R-12 xaxne alloiyea g� detach el or attached rroai dentia1 unit , duplex �ualitpl ai�n le �'�,;�iil�' � family reaidet\ti.al units, residential care facilities, public. support aerwice ®, manufactured homes, family day cr re occupations, and ccessory structures among other use ite' Plan and ap licant "a stae enr,� your Pre at infoz rust on u b various departments and agencies and from other t for mur � ®view. inform oa�naaai�i,�n Julia %:z� by f tiros will. be pre�,�ares�l i�f ,' , the sal in the near and a decd ion will be r dereciaon�th p opo and recommendation n dr future. If you wish to cent on this application. , we need your ; enta by , 192a. "ion laTisy u►e . the anac provided below or attach a eaparaeet letter to return your cosegeents. �i you arm n b ®r a aond bv' 1e move air tsa t. p1ea® *, ganone the w taff clontac t noted bsiow with our comments and cenfirva your comments in writing a® soon as poseib1iw. c PO �� w7� I �J.iaCi� SW Ball Elvd., ��.��7 � OR �1�e 6r the Tigard If 'j its, nave an questions regarding this natter, contact th Pigar Maniei.r ' Department, , 639-4%71. STAFF CONTACT= P 4E E CHECK TiAZ FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no ob j = ctiona to it. Please contact ,� -..., of out office. Please refer to the encloses! letter. Written Comments: armostamerteinew .ardeitw b�.. ..r...ww...Jw .., .. rAwor........mommooirmaok Natate of P eraon$ CoMmentinip .� Phone Number: rte, - i � - -. i�4 .ter" rierns.as�. r Toe Ron Pomeroy MDMt Chris Davies, Development Review Engineer SUB 93 -0007 -- GRAY -- LAMB /WAYMIRE March 15, 1993 Description: The applicant proposes to divide a parcel of approximately 7 5 acres into 49 lots. In addition a Sensitive Lands Review app.;-oval is requested tie) allow grading and filling for construction of street improvement: on land designated as a wetland Find .nc , 1. Streets: The site is located west of S.W. 92nd avenue,' east of S . L,, 85th Avenue, south of S.W. Du.ham Road, and north of Cook Park Access to the site is from S.W. 92nd Avenue which is classifieJd as a `minor collector and has the following minimum standards (all distances are from centerline) : 30 feet of right -of -way, 20 feet of pavementv curb and sidewalk. Currently there is 25 feet of Night -- of -way, 12 -14 feet of pavement, no curbs or sidewalk. The applicant is proposing, and sho.,id be required, to bring S.W. 92nd Avenue up to minimum standards along the frontage of the development. The applicant. is proposing to serve the development with a local east /wes',. street Several private streets with ha nmer heads" are 1spo t serve t� southern portion the site. applicant is proposing, and be re� ired to meet all local /private street standards. At the terminus of the local east /west street the applicant is proposing to install a 20 foot wide strip which will be dedicated and improved for fire access as well as a bike /pedestrian path to S. W. 85th Avenue 2. Salnitary Sewer the southern g public � � �� y located along There is an existing 8 inch sanitar sewer line locat rn property line, The applicant is proposing to, connect to and extend the sewer line, to serve this development ENGINEERING COMMENTS Stye E'--07 GRAY B /WAYMIRE . Storm Drainage: The applicant is proposing to collect the storm water at various points within the subdivision and direct it towards the wetlands. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Orden No. 91 -47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality or fees in-lieu of their construction. , of facilities structa.on. Section 7.10 Resolution . facility, er one oZ which is three criteria. the site not requiring a on-site tl8 a topography or soils makes it impractical, or ineffective to construct an on -site facility." The applicant has requested that a fee in -lieu be the steep slopes. The tngineerirg Department ap;?la cants request for the following reasons A. The only place to install a facility is is either on steep slopes (greater than wetlands/wetlands buffer area B. If a facility was installed the City would be required to maintain it. Installed in such an area as described above would add extra ordinary maintenance cost and concerns. Therefore, the apply ant should not be required to install a water quality facility, but should be required to pay the fee in -lieu. 4. Wetlands: Wetlands have been identified on the southern portion of the site p wetland delineation and Northwest EnviroScience, Inc. e-r.�ormed, a preliminary mitigation concept plan for the site The development of this site will require the filling of approximately 0. 15 acres. The mitigation plan calls for a wetland creation area of 0.2 acres and a enhancement area of 0.2 acres all on- site The identified wetlands, %and the mitigated wetlands are classified as a sensitive area under Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Being classified as a sensitive area requires that a undisturbed corridor hR provided which is a minimum of 25 feet wide, mt,4asured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area T1 applicant has defined the sensitive area and provided for tk,,e 25 f Jot buffet. At the time of application for -this development the applicant had not made application to the Corps of Engineers or the on of State bands The applicant should be to required to apply and mtat the require :ent,s of the Oregon Division of State Lands and Army Corps of Ent ,neers' as they pertain to the Wetlands and their mitigation. GRAY -LAMB/WAYMI' Recommendations: ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED Og FINANCIALLY RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON ON COUNT".. 1. Prior to this subdivision plat being xe;wxded with Washington County the Lot Line adjustment and Ninon Land Partition, known as MIS 93 - 0002 and MLP 93 -0003, respectively, in the City of Tigard Planning Department records, shall be approved and regarded or recorded si;iY ultat eously wtth the subdivision plat. Additional right -of -way shall be dedicated to the Public along the S.W. 92nd Avenue frontage to increase the right -of-way to 30 feet i rom' the centerline. The description shall be tier to the existing right-of-way centerline, • Standard half- street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, cvtrb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer: storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along the S.W. 92nd Avenue frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to minor collector stree standards and shall conform to the alignment ignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment appro °red by the Engineering ing Department , • Full width street improvements, including traffic control devices, mailbox clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway aprons, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed within the subdivision. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to local street standards. 5. The applicant shall provided for emergency access from the terminus of the local street to S.W 85th Avenue, This shall include dedication of right -of -way, bike/pedestrian access, and some type a access control which will prevent motorvehlcles from using the patty except for emergency veheenles. The access control shall be approved by the Tualatin Valley Fire District. 6. Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile const:cucti,)n drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, ail prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings requited» by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements 7. An erosion control lan shall 17 be provided as part of the ptbl,ic improvement drawings, The plan shall conform to 'Erosion' Control Plans ..- Technical Guidance Handbook, Noveaer 1989. • The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency iesolution and Order No, 91 -47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development wh:l,ch increases the impervious area ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 93-07 GRAY-LA" /11/10,YMI r,. within the public rig ht•= -of -wa The second part is Building within paid at Eui.ld Permit issuance which is for each individual lot The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing eiainageways with,Jut significantly impacting properties downstream. 10. Storm drainala details shall be provided g as part of the public improvement p ens Calculations , d a topographic map of the storm drainage basin service area shall be provided as a supplement to the Public t of the serviceable area. The location and cap ac yu f ublic improvement shall be based o existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. ci.�`.Y of 11. A grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours and typical finished floor elevations on each lot, including elevations at 4 different corners of the floor plan tied to the top of curb elevations as shown on the public ixnprovsment plans 12 The applicant should be aware that the City of Tigard has adopted Chapter 70 of the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code and that the grading plan shall comply with this chapter. 13. The applicant shall make an appointment for a pre-construction meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of the public improvement plans but before starting work on the site. The applicant, the applicant's engineer and contractor shall be required to attend this nteetu g prior to receiving the approved plans and permits. 14. Construction of the proposed public improvements and issuance of Building Permits shall not coutmenue until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans, street a o, ngm a r construction compliance agreements has been executed, eec � ` on ,c a developer - engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees 15. Prior to the plat being recorded with W. *hingTton County the applicant shall vid, percent performance assurance or lec'er of commitment. s an 100 the applicant may have the plat recorded after the public improvements have been accepted by the City of Tigard and has posted the appropriate Maintenance Bond. 16, A Sensitive Lands Permit shall be obtained by the applicant from the US Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands, (Authority Section 404, Clean tuna* er Act, and ORS 541.605 and 641.695) . A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department by the applicant ro 17 The applicant shall p vide,. as a minimum, a 25 foot buffer along the drainaageways and along the boundary of the weta and area whiCh meets the .requirements of Section 6:08, of I &O No 91 -47: ENGINEERING COMMENTS: SUB 93 -07 Y'LAHB /TIAY li 18. The `a Pp licant shall obtain a °Joint Perrot "" from, the City of Tigard. This permit shall meet the requirements of the NPDES and Tualatin Basin Erosion Control Program. IN ADDITICwN THE APPLICANT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF CODE.; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. Improvement Agreement A. Before City approval is certifiet1 on the final plat, and before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Subdivider shall: 1. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer ,specifying the period within which all required, improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specifLed, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the subdivider. The agreement shah, stipulate ipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. 2. SECTION 18.160.180 Bond A. As requited by Section 1,8.160.170, the subdivider shall f,i].e with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: 1. An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon; 2. surety L by a surety company authorized to transact business in t which remains in A curet bond executed he State of Oregon wY�i force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or 3, Cash, B The subdivider shall furnish t the City '' g r an itemized improvement estimate, certified b y a rea .stered c ivil engineer, to assist the C -y Engineer in calculating the &Mount of the performance assurance. C. The subdivider snail: not ca' termination _ f nor allow use o expiration of said guarantee without having fist secured written authorization from the City, ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUi3 53 O7 GRAY -°LAM A3AyMIR,E ▪ SECTION 18.160.190 Filing and Ilecordivig A Within 60 days of the City review and approval, the applicant shall submit the final plat to the County for signatur' s of County officials as required by ORS Chapter 924 Upon final recording with the County, the applicant ;'Hall submit to the City a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. ▪ SECTION 18.162.080 Final Plat Application Submission Ae q uiremenz s A. Three copies of the partition plat prepared by necessary surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and nece y narrative. B . The partition plat and data or narrative shall be &awn to thy§ minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (OR' 92.05) , Washington County, and by the City of " Tigard. • SECTION 18.162.110 Centerline" Monumentation Monument Box Requirements A. Centerline Monumentation for all Major Partitions: 1, The centey..lines of all street and roadway rights -of -way shall re monlamented as prescribed in ORS 92.060 (2) before City acceptance of street improvements under the following specifications a. Centerline monuments are required to have w'.r went boxes conforming to City standards set fo:.° those monuments within the pavement area; and b The tops of all monument boxes shall be set to finished pavement grade. B. 10.164.120 Utilities 1. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be p g pt for surface mounted laced underground, . except transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during conruction, high capacity electric lin€a operating at 50,00') volts or above. 1. All improvements, installed by the subdivider shall be guaranteed as to workmanship io.rc1 material for a period of one year following acceptance by the City. ENGINEERING COMI F _ 7 �. .. . T � 'STS SUB �� 0 ► �:��tA�' °Ls�Ek�W1��!'3:i Such gua :anit.ee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of thc, value of the iimprovements as set by the ` City Engineer The Cash k r ` blind shall comply with the terse and conditions of Section 18.160„180. D . 18.164. 150 Xnstallat ion: erequisit /1 ermit Fee 1. No lan4.i. division improvements, including. sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, .44:dewaiks, curbs, lighting or other plans therefor has ,o shall be undertaken except after the R been approved by the City',. parr tt fee paid and permit issued 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City, has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. ;i,R. _ 164.200 Engineer's Certification Acquired 1. The land divider's engineer shall provide A44. en certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices a and are of high grade, prior the City acceptance of the subs ivision s improvements , or any a � portion thereof for operation and maintenance. APPROVED: Randa,m1 Re Wooled City Engineer CD. sub93 -07.CD ENGINEERING COMMENTS s SUB 93 -'07 ii. � mu' rw'•�.L ,'i , _ � » � _ � W .: �y DLL•. 1 �Po'• 4 r��l; L. �Ti RECEIVED PLANNING 8 ..r 1P TO: IZA21-2i ‘4:441 V ~,,.,... DA'C'E a FROM: Ti acrd P., nning Department RE: usBD Sip ® ' tEL 93.. s G l AY_ ir RE (NI"0 6) Th* appl a nt r, ;tiodets pr limtnarY 813bdiviston plat 'approval` r), to divide approximately 7.5 acres into 49 tote ranging, in si,,se from 4.J00 to 12,000 cquaar feet in r,Lize. Sensitive Landis Review approval, is also requested to allow drainagewaay and wetland .w modifications. liPPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: CommonitY Rey to ut Code Chapters 18.54, 18.84, 28.89, 18 92, 18. 100, ; 18.102, 18 ass, 18.160, and ,� 7.1.2, ?.4b4, 7.&°.19 8.1.1 and Comprehensive 3 Plan LOCATION: Policies lof the land on S . 92nd Avenues between Tigard Eii.gh School and Cook Park (1WCTI4 251 14A taw lots 100 et 1000) ZONE: R-12 (Reaidentiaal 12 units /acre) The ,0. 1;2 atkndl all /�+we single-family detached or attached residential units, dupinx and aaulitple family residential units, residential care facilities, public eur ort �a`rVioee, manufactured homes, family day care, home occupations, and ac+Coea Gory structures aritopg other uses. Att�w ha is the Site Plan and aapplicaant ° s statement for your review. Prom ire :formation applied by Vaarrioua depart (ante and agencies and from oth r �n rendered on the o �a� recommendation will be prepared information available to out. . =�taaSf, a re and in the near fLxt�E�� If you wish end a decision will be rend. to comment on thin application, n+�edp f comments by r 1 at 192a. You may, use the space provided below or attach a Separate letter to return your co msato. 4 .,rya. arm unabi to ea ►na the atrove . siklt.. please phone tin staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comment - in writing as soon ale If you have any questions regarding this matter, Contact the Tlgtard possible. L raking Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW a.11 Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PHONE: 639-4171. STAPP CONTACT: a Roan . Pomeroy .... . PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING .ITEM: THAT APPLY: e W have roviewed tbs proposal and have no ob j ectiona to it Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Weitten Comments: of our office. Name of Person commenting Phone Humber: ~ a� • w7, T4 j rd- Tualatin School District 23J Lamy Hibbard Administration Center 13137 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 07223 Tel. (503) 620 -1620 Pax ('t 03) 684-2296 City of Tigard Ron Pomeroy/Planning Dopartmeint P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Pomeroy: In zesi3ionse to your request for comments development ��s� on the deer called Waverly Estates (SUB 93-0007), located off 92nd juu east of the Tigard High School, the attached is submitted as a statement of impact. Bud Hillman Director of Operations Steve Stolze w attachments Jerry Edwards w / attachments Russ Jold w f attachments 1 ��J X. _.x� t �. +x �.'', *' a.l. u_ :I'S 4.t LEGIBILITY STRIP TIGFIRD—TURLRTIN SCHOOL DISTRICT 236.1 = CITYZEOUNTY RESIDE TIRE. I C TR T EMS 7' e Waverly Estates Single-Family Multi - Family Date 3/9193 [ 11 School Design Actual Capacity Enrollment j +. +. impv of Prior I.pprovea DOW .4-t-MelliS d , sted School Capacity Requirement (Sum of Columns 2,4 8 ) 425 900 761 [ 139 97 86 1585 -120 1 660 ...11MCIMilia•••01riMMINj Fir explanation of columns 1 through 6, see code on back sheet. 1465. School(s) capacity not exceeded (column 6 less than column 1) School(s) capacity exceed -core facilities are sufficient to consider portable additions Sufficiency determined by requirements of Uniform Building Code andfor City County codes. School(s) capacity exceeded—core facilities insufficient to consider portable additions. Additional capacity may be provided by Cher options under consideration by the School District which include: grade level: reconfiguration, rescheduled school year, boundary adjustments, double shift „, busing to under - utilized facilities, futwe 1- end measures leading to new construction, and other housing option. These options and statements have been p epared by Tigard Tualatin School District Administration Staff and approve: by the Board of Directors. This school impact star~ Tent is for the Sigegal Bud Hilim D► t)ctor of Operations and Tra! s rtatiot (6E14-2221) dicated development, and is vali for 120 days. IMPACT STATEMENT CODE Columi t 1 School capacity reflects the number of classrooms, portables on site, and Special Education program acc'omodations at an individual school. Column 2 Actual current school enrollment- kindergarten has been computed at one -haft. Column 3 Current available capacity-difference of column 1 and column 2. Column 4 Impact of previously approved developments - determined by School District housing formula `see School District Housing Formula shown below) Column 5 Impact of requested development - Determined by School District :lousing formula Column 5` Adjusted school capacity requirement determined by the sum of columns 2,4 and 5 - and places developmental request in A, B or C category. SCHOOL DISTRICT RICT HOUSING FORMULA Single Family Dwelli m Sc11OOLs DESIGN CAPAcrry gyRRENT ENROLLMENT AS OF 2/19i93 Tigard High School 1465 1 585 Tualatin High School 1465 953 Fowler Middle School 900 7 9 Hazelbrook Middle Sch. 800 711 Twality Middle School 900 761 CFT Elem. 570 494 Mary Woodward Elem. 600 6 6 2 burl' rn Elam 425 397 Templeton: Elern. 55.0 554 Metzger Elem. 550 500 Phil Lewis Elem. 500 410 Byrom Elem. 600 592 Tualatin Elem. 600 561 Bridgeport Elem. 600 603 TOTAL 10525 ` 9562 0.46. Pre -first grade children per dwelling 0..37 Elementary stude to per dwelling 0.13 Intermediate liate students per dwelling 0.08 High school s ucisnts per dwelling 0.57 Total school age students per dwelling ultipl amity rellirjg 0.08 Elementary students per dwelling €0..03 Intermediate students per dwelling 0.02 Hgh school students per dwelling 0.1! 3? Total F'baoi age students per dwelling. RECEIVED PLANNING MIAS T PCR CC yN �+IM,,y DATE ,:. PROM: Tigard Planning Department SIGN SUB 93-0Q21, N :I7C S ". =:' 5 *, (I WO #6) The applicant requests preliminary St vi -' en 7e .at approval to 'divides approximately 7.5 a c ess into 49 lots raining in 'iee froel 4,000 to 12,000 /aware feet in size. Ben itiVt Lands Review approval is also requested to allow drainageway and wetlands saw .ificationa. APPLICASLE PIEVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Cod Ch voters 18.54, 18.84, 18.88, 18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 18.150, 18.160, and .1I3.164; CcprrheneiVe Plan Policies 2 d 1.1, 3.1.11, 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 8. 1.1,, and 8.1.3 CATION: A. portion of the land on SW 92nd Avenue High Tigard School and Cook Park (W H 251 14A, tax 1.ota 100 1000) ZONE: R-12 (Residential, 12 nrnita ®eCte) The 12 Zone allows a'imgi1e -f; gaily detached or attached _re: idential units, dupJ sx and nulitp1 family residential unite, residential care facilitiee, pan& li.c 5' 0erviCDe , manufactured home, feraily day caCe, home occupations, and acCesmcry et u t Urea among other liege. Attached i,t the Site Plain and applicant's statement for your reev � ate, Elora by departments ._ s ; a 1 from ether information a i Vt supplied our t ff, a report nand recommendation � w be pr� pa►.:.cad and a information, arm Liable the proposal in the Zees future. If rear, wish o rent on will s 'applicatian1 we need your cwaiente by gligag.lar 1922. yen may use the ep . co provideet below or attach a sever - to letter to return your compute. If 'ou are unable to eexmnd b thy: abcyr® a3 a lease hon'� htign`a f ontcontact � � � ta in 9 as noted le. with haver any enuestions regarding rding matter, centt ' the, Tigard ai�$.bl @. •y' ,. 1.1 Blvd. , °��iG�a��., OR. 97223. P.,e?�E3 Planning Department„ PO Box 23397, 639 4171. STAPF CONTACT: _Ron PLUS CHECK THE FCLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no ob jea ti ®»a to it. Please contact , of out office. °:g.eaoe refer to the enoloeed letter. orwommoneworra Nri`I ten C i eftas co PROM2 Tigard Planning Department OUE 9. -000 , SEI S T I (11100 #6) The apPlicent requoste preliminaryH a1 hdivv i ion AND L, , , . Plat PP pP y 5 acres jtnto 49 loe ,� ranging in size from 4��t to divide a� re��ci�a�t�el 7 ...,. 4,000 to 12,000 square feet i n � ze S eaa it .tee 'Lands Ravi E wa approval is also request d to allow drain g away W,Ad eetlando modifications. AP 'L! ALE MEVIEW CRXTERXA: Cemmunnity Development Code Chapters '9.154, 16.66,E 18.920 16.100, 16.10 2 , 16.1�°�0, 18.160, "'i 16.1641 srehenely Plan Policies 20161, 3.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and S.163. LOCATION; A pot ion of the land en SW 92nd A.' enet between Tigard High School and Cook Park two 251 14e, tam lots 100 a' �� c� ®d or attached remi,d M�ntia�l unite, The , Hel2 zone : l�,a��as si�n�leef ZONE; (Residential, 12 unig ® /ae:re��.�e® drinple,e and mulitplee family ly resirdent aal unite, residential care fadi li ties, Public ' support services manufactured hoodoo family day cared how oce upatione 0 and accessory structures amopg ot1vr uses b CEO CEO «: ID993 i..o.rl.Em.u.l.mKa�arrr 1993 .:..4. DAT'E3 MaVal to 1933 a,. Afetathed La the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review,. Free i necemation eupplie : by various departments and agenciea and fro other informatior:n available te staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to` comment on t nie application, your corm a to by YYso , 1952. You mar and a decision will be use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Yf yssu _ar<< ups le_ ter s see nd by tip apse Plante please phone the staff' contact noted below with your comments` and cor Ti your con ente i.� writing th soen as ad writing as possible. If you have any re areii n this matt Tigerd Planning Department, PO Sox 23397, 13125 SW 'Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-41710 STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomero Worm PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT )PLY o We he reviewed the proposal and have no olb jecta.one to it. P], ease contact �. of o r of rice Please r - for to the nclo®e d letter. XX Written eramment5 z h t at obj ee:' ions 0 the District will District has no District Although the Water � i Y o . h� require that a 8 D.I. a water main be? extended from SW 92nd t'� t east end of the project. Fire hydrant placement will be , oordinated between, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue and the Water District. Name of Person OLevatn g.: MachaEa Miner/ Seniar Management Analyst 9-I554 U w TO: �' i�► /'' is 7 RECEIVED PLANNING r ' O,. 19 . RECEIVp PANNING DAT*: I' ch 4 1993 ,--- -- ' : Tigard Planning Department RE: s P: __M► g3 -oo0z S4 7aI C r i w !s ., g i -odi9a ' LAMB !AYM M (1P #6) The applicant requei Me preliminary Subdiviinion' plat approval to divide a FP rokaatel y 7 .I acres a into 43 lots ranging in size fr om 4, 000 to 12, 000 square feet size nensitiee Lands Review � .. approval is also requested to pillow dra eageeee and wetlands m ifioaRtiora. APPLICABLE RSVIEW CRI RIA Community Development Code. Chapters 1E1.54, 18.84, 18.88, n.92, 18.100 18.102, 16.150, 18.160f and, 18.164; Comprehensive Plan '' ol: ciea 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: portion of the land on SW 92nd Avenue tween Tigard High School and Cook Park jWCTM 251 14A, tic lots 100 & g ZONE: iunits, TeS i - single-family y detached or attached sidenti l du plex and nallt rlle- family renidexntial units, _ residential care facilities, public support eervicsn, manufactured homes, family day care: home et:ctiripatik,ons, and accessory structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant ° s tate sent for your review. rem information supplied by various departments and agencies and from her p n will be 1 �'epared and®ritiaaec ,eion will bet rendered staff, n the peo s*l in the near future. If you wish to commeat on this application, we need your convents b Mar. 15, 1992. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your co ants. =tied. below 'with eyour comments and confirm your please in Writing soon as s I-.Y,'o...�.... Rae amcave date leas possible. I' you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 132/5 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHO1„ : 639-4171. STA`, CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy PLEAS' CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: �c�cx We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: R1O./eFl10.1110s1IleY ! elute Of vet' on 0oinimentin0 .._..r . Phas I� e �.�er: ; '721= 2449 SCOTT P L of our office. .. '...lie1�0WIElIf61110Y0�R®EYY ra RECEIVED PI PSNING MAR 1 Q 19.93 DAM: FROM. Ti and Planning Department 73H: S.1: h'' 'i -IO'' UR 93 -!00 8 TI applica3'lt tequPete preliminary Subdivision plat approval to divide a pp►^oxi m ttay 7.5 acres into 49 Tots raaunging , in size frog 4,000 tc 12,000 square feet in tits. Sensitiva Lande Review approval requested Too dra na away aid wetlands ificati c e, APPLICABLE REVIEW C UTER A$ Co~nunity Develop t Cede 18 84, 1B 88, 18 92, 16-100, i,102, 18.,150 , 18.160, and 18.154 ;eC 10.54 C�hm pr�e • leiA1R'4ive Plan Policies 21.t, 3.1.1, 7 . i.. 2, 7.4.4, 3 t► 6 . 1 p 0.1.1, and 8.1.3. d on SW 92nd Avenue between Tigard High LOCATION: Rand Co l* r'ti.r�n of the' � 1 14k, talc Kota 100 & � park ��V3 2`4J4 10�'' 0) i OI' 'S R--12 (Residential, 12 emits iacre) The Rw12 tune allows ' residential. unite, duplex and koli�tple� Single-family detached or attached �e� ®idBra pub/id sarsua � �rt family residen�.iti unite, residential care factlitiea, b1 p. �4 q dery e manufactmnred hones, family u it day dare, home e Occupations, tions, and accessory struCturNt among other Users. Attadhed IA the Site Plan and applicant a atatea nt aaori your u and revidwo W dFrom infr,raatiOn supplied by various departments, and aq infOrmation available to our staff, a report and recoraamaldatien will be prepared and deciaaion will be render d on the proposal in thr) boor future. If you wiah to comment on thin application, we heed your cOmmentis by latja, 19u° ,' ,. you taw -� the spade provided below or attach a separate letter tb return your c�lanentea. u�'tio � x a unab e to tea .t. r nd . the above date, please phone the act noted below wins, ouar co raente and Conant) . your comments i> Writin�gaas men as n Y_ possible. If you have any qiiestiOlia regarding this Matt - r contact the Tigard 13125 �w Has13. �blvd. , Tigard, OR 9'�2�3. PHONE: Planning Department, Pn? Sox 23►1;9�' p 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: EtaP ©ttb ®rte PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APP/at We have reviewed th® Q iS.. ro p .sal and l .r• ie no o jeCtionc to it. Ploaae contact ,._, ak of or office. ,ate Pleads refer to the enrM loped letter. Written Comioenta averwarawreows eamoraunri � GName o f Person Coat®atu� - Phone Number: • a R (101.111111:E1 DATE" FR014: Tigard Planni3ng Department RE: SJ BDXV SXO s Q9 L .. SENSI _ 1 S SW LAMB; G a •. `NPD 06> The applicant reciPente preliraiinarY Subdivision plat approval to divide approximately 7. E acres; into 49 lots ranging in alse from 4,0t0 to 12,000 $gi4are feet in sise. Sensitive Lands RevieW approval is also ' requested to all * drainageway and wetlands modifications. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18. 8.88, 18.92, x.8.100, 18.102, 18.150, 18.160, and 13.16k rehons ve Plan c� g 18.84, 1 irasx: P ®lic�.eC� ieol4l, 3.1.1, 7.1.2, 7o4L3o46 7.6 41, nd L TW! : A portion of the land on SW 92s�id Avenue �.� and between Tigard High School and Gook Park. (W Sl 14A, tax lots 100 1 The I�� -1asG r ®nth allows 1000) ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) T ynd axe aU aingl.e4-f�i .y detached or attached residential unites, dupl.e�x :, le- faai ty residential u , .ta, residential carts facilities, pu ►lie eupport aervic ®e, manufaottu ed homes, faaily day p home t� 'lpa t ions, and li ry • ae�,t:ee, �1►a Structures n other ua�aa3 Att ched is the 'Site Plan and appi icant ° e state went for your review. From, departments rn ntn re agencies and from other and ag information supplied by various recommendation �il.l. be) prepared information available to our staff, If you red tha prop©asaal. in the near fu1uee. y M 2. You. ay and a decision will be rendered ' on to count on this raui.dea� below attach need Your csmetente his 19�,� I/� ch a s atrate letter to r�eturrnr o n'ta. xfe oue space . please phone the staff contact j� A noted 1 with o'ur comments and confirm your commenta in writing ae sin as ,�E1a�i� K'd res��ad b '�h® a�rme �d�,#'c2 a sib] e. 12 you have any queetiona� rega .d ng this matter, contact the Tigard Y. X d, CR 97223 . PHONE: Plasnnin D ®�aarta�artt, P�► Hex 239, � l.��1.25 SW Ralf. Bivd., Ti ar 639 -4171^ STAFF CONTACT: Ron Poi nerd PLEASE CHECK THE F0LL0WTN4 ITEMS THAT APPLY: _.. W3 have reviewed the proposal and have no objection► to it. itontrottottorts immontroottromt motatwauttatamet Please contact .,,, of our °trit e. Please refer to the enclosed 1ett t. n c c. entr►: ,L3 le-4004 Written 1, • Name of Person Commenting: Phone Boer a Cs!-Y' �: mot.. ko.yb A ; c c. 5 nisirtelittottititit • t • PM: Tigad Planning Department ma s 93' R fer do . SUB . 93.,. s ', O' _ �.(D013 ,n, x • ;. (NPO #6) The applicant ;gayjueats preliminary Subdiviiiof plat approval to divide approximately 7.5 acres into 49 1Ota ranging in square feet in aei,me. Sensitive Lands review 12,000 size roval id �® also �2requested to allow drainageway and wetlands smdificatiogs. APPLICABLE R? IE CRITERIA: Commanity Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.84, 18.38, .18.92, 15.100, 18.102, 18. 150, 18.3.60, and 18.164 p Comprehensive Plan lOo1i ie& 2.1.1, 3.1.3., 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: : A, pr :rtion of the 1a% d on SW 92nd Aa nue town Tigard High School and Ciaofk 'Park (WCTM 261 140, tax lots 100 1000) : ial, 12 units/acre) ye 42 zone allows ft detached attached units, du p lex and m tit p1em family residentia.1 unit®, residential. care facilities, publlo support services, manufactured ;meal, family day cage, home occupations, Arad acceSaory structures among other uses. Attached Le the Site Plan and applicant's stateme it for your review. Pros information supplied by ,various departments and agencies and from Other information avaaila ble to our staff, a report and recommendation 'wilt be prepared and a Vision will be renderad on the proposal in the near future. If you wish use the space ce provided below oz. attach a separate letter to r 13 . to ccaaMe � on this application, wo need your comments � areturn 1v comments. u 5 e M e stall contact noted below wine ousrec� �sr�`th.�� o�� dates R gl, ®aac� phoxte i�h a r viwr� .�..srx..r- erst.rr.w nMr y and Confirm your comments in writing as saran as possible. If you have arty gueaattione regarding this matter, contact the TigaJrd Pledging Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomero PLEASE SE a CK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT Prlar We have revie9ed the proposal and haVvo no obiectioane to it. Please contact ,r<�..:.. :. :.. of our office. Please reefer to the enclosed letter. eV .�.r■.d.Iar.. S�ritten Comments; Aomiertmoseramid NaMe of Person Cotitet iPig 0' r rn.iw.r �+e "tsars:: Phone mumbo O I First American Title iltiStfratiCe An assumed busrnass name of Tine INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON 1 700 SAN, FOURTH AVE., PORTLAND, OR 9720`; .,55112 (503) 222 -3651 WAVERLY CONSRTUCTION ATTN: KEN WAYMIRE 318 3 5 SW COUNTRY VIEW LN WILSONVILLE OR 97070 s appreciate this opporlaJnil y to be CO service to you. Please remember Firsi Anteddfiti 11118 Insurance Comp j, tit Ofegon Oor yo ij E riow a ici Fitts inat irenOit ds. Agents and offices in the following counties in Oregon; Benton, Clackamas, Coos, CroOk, Curry, Deschutes, Douglas, Hood River, Jackson, Jefferson, Josephine, Klamath, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Malheur, iilarioh, Multnomah, Polk, Sherman, Tillamook, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wasco, Washington, Wheeler and Yamhell. This ti `srioner ooh insti fit charge, bri nfotnin nco With the lid minds atl the Warn. ti 2Fe int`OOmatban has txaan furnished, Insur . _ e instated* an Vim, nets me Only, b s M$tt n0 IntertnaediatiesWill not be p►e itted, Sid ser met Ire dikent rued. iii indisc�r+�e►i toott mod for any ernes in this report. Title Department 1515 SW Fifth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201 Phone (503)220- -0015, Fax (503)273 -8325 MBLIC RECORD REPORT FOR SUBDIVISION Tins RFSORT IS FOR TIE F,XQLUSIVE USE OF Name Oregon Title Insurance C wpany Address: 1515 SW Fifth, Suite 840 Portland, Oregon 97201 Attention: Laurie Stroscheini Phone No (503) 2201 - 0343, Fax (503) 220• -0706 Date Rrepexed October. 27, 1992 Order No.: bf02O2w Proposed Plat: 1) Definitions (a) "Customer": The person or persons named or shown (ri this covet `sheet. �e title plant date of Oregon Title. (b) "Effective date" The71_ reference, n this u ingrovements affixed ixed ther c � �� 3nd`° . The Iona aesc � berg, specifically e � �. pub .l.�.o record report and ,, thereto which by law col Istituto real property. (d) "Aims anti encumbrances" ► include taxes, Bo ages a deeds of trust, t„"ontracts, assignments, ts, rights of way, easements, covenants, and. other restrictions on title. (e) "Public records": Those records which by the laws of the state of Oregon impart constructive notice of matters relating to said land. u) Liability of Oregon Title: (a) THIS IS NOT A CavivIITMENT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AM DOES NM' CONSTI UTE A POLIC ' OF TITLE INSURANCE. E. (b) The liability of 0r* gon Title for errors or omissions in this pool .c record report is limited to the amount of fee paid by ctstcnie:, p xiJiCea; however, that Oregon T Title has ai abili ty in the event of no actual loss to the customer. (c) No costs of defimse or proriecution of any action, is afforded to the cu *x er Oren , , t :isa asst ►s '.,ability for loss or damage by (,�) In any dent, Oregon Ti reason of the fol iowwit Subdivision Conditions, 1. • Report Stipulations and Definitions, continued liens by the Taxes or assessments which are not , as existing Wises �. ec • authority that levies taxes or records of any taxing records. ' on n real p or by the pu blic 3.nterest or claims which are not sr by 2. ��' rights, � .� an inspection public facts, b* which could be ascertain �. inquiry of persons in ,mission t��f 3. the land or by making � or claims thereof, �,ai� -cx� are ��eriK',ntS, liens or encumbrances, the public records. 4. not shown by the in area, conflicts boundary ts, Discrepancies, encroachments, W� disclose. lines or any survey other facts which a (ii) reservations or exceptions in 5 e (� � U�atented mining claims; ( thereof; (iii) � patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance ia.i. water rights or claims or title to water. . _.le interest, estate or easement in land beyond .Z 6 • Any right, title, if ically described or referred to in ��5 of the area � report, or in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or aterways regulation (including but not . law, ordli.nanee or governmental r�• ordinances or r '��q limited to building zoning laws, ar�d .� i ;� prohibiting or relates . ( ) restricting, regulating, �� Ct�a'C' occupancy, use or enjoyment of improvement the land; (ii) the character, erected tecl P location of any pensions or or a change the (iii) a separation in p ors the land; �" . land is the parcel of which the �i or area of �'�� land or any tal effect of a ,art; or (iv) faction, or the ef,. or' was � or governmental any violation of these laws, ' ordinances , regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement lien or encumbr re..�sul thereof or a notice of a �laticnn affecting the land has beea�. from a violation or .leg recorded in the public records at the effective date hereof governmental police , not excluded by (II)( c�) (7) above, 80 the extent that notice of the exercise thereof or a lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation notice of a defect, the � land has been, recorded in the records at affecting or alleged at the effective date hereof. � Y public fe adverse claims or ether matters Defects, liens, encumbrances, 9. created, suffered, assumed, agreed to or actually by the , east -r. (III) Report Entire Contract: cu�stcx' nil have . or Any rights or actions or rights of action that t. of this i oat of the subject . • i No bring against Oregon Title arising �tter ®� at a ;�vi,sionS of =.. report.. vii report y must be 'used on . the p changed ' rt can be waged o�., condition of this report , �.: that �� form an a y Oregon Title. signed by ., �' has been ,� tt 't�l® C�4,1s' report, the � chase a title i:nst�aranc®- Policy but: has eS y^�U�rL'`Y:ty to ulalic record report and accep�.s the afforded the apps utilize th S fold of p • o f liabi�_ ty of Ore et forth herein, elected to � .. �,znu.�ation. "� Title as s (IV) Fee: The fee charged for this RePort c es hot i nclud suPPlenienial rePorts, upd teS or other addz+ianal s ervi des of Oregon Title. . 4 IA w 4- A. and referred to i a this public record Cre ,or i located follows: n the ty The Z of VJ State of Oregon, and (Continued) As of the effective date and accorditIg to the public reccrds , we find title to the land, apparently vested in: PLEASE SEE "EXHIBIT A - VESTING" ATTACH HERETO C. And as of the effective date and 'according to the putIliQ record, the letld is subject and encumbrances, which are not ,� aub to �.e follot� liens ai. necessarily shown in tine order of priority 'faxes for the year 1992 -93 . 179.14 $9].4 $9.14 plus : 023,78 • 8517373 2114A-0100D ( Mfects Parcel VIII) la Taxes for the year 1992 -93 C?ir�.g3.na. Amaiunt : $7, 905.61 $7,905.61 $7,905.61 plus interest, if any • 023.74 • R517382 : 2S114A..01OOO Tax Amount unpaid Balance Code INC . Key No. Map No (Affects Parcels VI ' and V'II) (Continued .a• Subdi v i.sion /Part t cen Repot Order No. bf02O2w Legal Description, Continued PAR I The North 19 acres of that certain tract in Section 14, Township 2 South, Range 1 'West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County, of Waehingitan and State of Oregon, which tract is described as follows i nni! g at a point 13 . chains West of the Northeast corner of BFtM; 33 1/3 Section 14, Township 2 South, Rang; 1 Wost; thence South 29.84 chains; thence West 13.33 1/3 chains to a stake; thence North 29.84 chains to the center of road on section line between Sections 11 and 14; thence East 13.33 1/3 chains to the point of beginning. g created by .n newts SU'HJBCr � the interest of the City , of T.i. as c�� •� recorded August 26, 1983 as Recorder's Fee No. 83031423 and August 19, 1991 as Recorder's ree No. 91045270. PARCEL 11: Beginning at an iron rod on the West line of that certain tract of land in 14, Townsh 2 South, Rye 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in Section p State of � . the City of Tigard, County of Washington and Stay a-�, conveyed to John , checkla 'es Tract No. 2 in the Deed deoorded on Page 91 of Hook 156, Washington County Deed Records, which iron rod is West 1760.0, feet and South 0 01' West' 940.5 feet from a Gtone at the Northeast corner of said S being the Southwest comer of a tract of land described Deed Section 14, _ fram John S ckla, et ux, to Union High 2 Jt , Tigah, Wathington ty, ce, recorded etu 13, in Page 222; and running thence along the West ineo f t e ao a mentioned Scheck1a prop erty South 0° 01' West 1028.5 feet to an iron rod at the Southwest corner of Tract No. 2 of Deed in Book 156, Page 91; thence along the snonurn►ted South line of the Soloman Richardson' Donation Land Claim Ho. 44, South 89° 54' East 359.8 01' 484.6 feet to an ire rod; feet to an iron rod; thence North 0 01 East line of the above thence East 520. to an iron rod on the East 520.2 feet mentioned Scheckla property; thence along said Bast linee, North 0 ° 01' East 544.5 feet to an iron rod; thence West 880.00 feat to the place of beginning. SUBJECT TO the interest of the City of Tigard instruments created. ]� corded August 26, 1983 as Recorder's Fee No. 83031423 and August 19, 1991 as 14.enr _�f�er' s Fee No. 91045270. PARCEL III: The Wsst 260 feet of the following ' ing de5cri wed tract of land situated in Section 14, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Wi e lame Meridian, in the, City of Tigard, Caunty of Washington of and State Oregon: inning at a point 66 rods South of the Northeast o said Sectic n 14; thence West 53 1/3 rods; thence South 24 ro� thence E ; thence North 24 rok to the point of beginnIng. (Continued) Subdivision/Partition Repo .• .b_ bf0202w Legal Description, Continued, PARCEL 1V: e West 260 feet of the following described tract of land situated in 14, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in Section 1.�, Tc�p 2 Sou��, the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon: Beginning at a port 30 rods South of the Northeast corner of said Section 14; thence West 53 1/3 rods; thence South 36 rods; thence East 53 1/3 rids; thence North 36 rods to the point of beginning. PP V: A tract of land in the Northeast one - quarter of Section 14, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the city of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning g at the Northeast corner of Sect ion 14, Township 2 South, Range 1 thence West along s .:ota on line, 53 West of the Willamette Meridian; r� , . 1/3 rods; South 30 rods; thence East 53 1/3 rods to section line; thence North along section line, 30 rods to the place of beginning. SUBJECT TO the interest( he City of Tigard as created by instruMents recorded August 26, 1983 1 Recorder's Fee No 83031423 and August 19, 199 1 as Recorder's Fee No, 910.5270. PARCEL VI: A tract of land in the Northeast one- quarter of Section 14, Thwnsni p 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at an iron tad on the West line of that certain tract of land in Township Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamett e Meridian, in of Washington and State of Oregon, , the City of Tigard, County . John Scheckla as Tract No 2.n the Deed recorded on Page 91, Book 156, , Washington County Deed Records, which iron rod is West 1760.0 feet and South 0° 01' West 940,5 feet from a stone at the Northeast corner of said Section 14, being the Southwest corner of a tract of land described in Deed County, John S W ton iInt .kla, et ux, to Union High 2 Jt , Tigard, 13, 1952 in Book 329, Page 222,• thence along the Oregon, recorded F'ebruarY 13 0° � West the above mentioned Scheckla property, S • �. South, 0 01 Wee Wa„st ].one or 1028.5 feet to an iron rod at the Southwest corner of a Tract No 2 of Deed in Book 156, Page 91; thence along the monwnented South line of the SolOmon Richardson Donation Land Claim No 44, South 89° 54' East 359.8 feet to an iron rod and the true point of beginning of the tract herein dscribedP ° 01' 484.6 feet to an iron rod; thence East 520.2 fee's (� 01 East 48. t,heru�en rod on the East line of the above Mentioned Scheckla ply, thence South to the Southea;° along said East line 484 feet, More or less, corner thereof; thence West along the South line thereof 520 feet, more ox,, less, to the true po int of beginning. ( Um :timed ) SEE MAP 2S.i IIOC OELIH est.:O1s- 100 ALSIIA(. sl TIGARD KILN Sckoot �". SCHOOL' DISTRICT 251 DURHAM ••J �' TERM. 8N. kb 429 - • ROAD ,, q.421i 13.11429 1{l4,9 1 14 r WELT OJi 201 001 as Acs 1110,2 4 +04,0 iIC 1000 Aa Z14A6 1302 t i,is - aac•'4•F ' 46!it„r_ r.� m,Y6�iv' N Ruwl► Jena 20 #GTA AT. �- . 1900.!' ~1Tfl Ifik did 1211120 12E0 Tim, si od. k: 6074 244194 •� 4 o SU Vied," ,t /Partition Repot as - Desr r ption, Contxn A tract of tar 3 'he: Noreheast one-quarter of 'Section '�.4 Town 1p 2 South, Range .1 Wet of the Willamette Meridian, am' ` ' city of Tigard,; .+otinty of WWaslla n ton and State of Cheery, described desarthed as fo11C i s Ct nerp; ' at the one - quarter corn ' on the Easy: Bane' of r coon 14, Towns I,p 2 "South, PaY ge 1 West of the Willamette Meri401,(:'#( th?, ' Ctty cif T ga l j Ct,`sun o�: Wad -i rig ,aim State Et ad st. -We st ��r ' 11rA r 40 to this true' �7�it 'of be infOxi i" _ thence continui alog said ' oenter. line, West 80 rocs b,z ),the. SoUtt est d n er o zhav4 rs 'Iraot f . thenc4 North along the East lire thea:eof, 41 r and 4 feet ,.'to the South .1` r e of 'S . ' i Donation Land., :Claim, . aenc;'.e lE . along sa, South line, '67 rods to E, L. Sehe .a' s Southeast corner; , th+ 1 nth 4604 the East line ` .er'eo , 30 a. ds to the Sou est coma~ Shave. es Tract in said Section 14; East along the 1asla t ereof,., a3 rter the plaint Of intersec tian with t-he West link,- 'extended Northerly, to the: Willjan! Cotpo ation Track .as .described � 28�5ae, „ s r t n CCa4 Irr�, QiOgonti thence 860',:h , s rPe a cgae r 10880. `tote place o beg .ng. Fla A try et �� :land i� th� No�ast ��e- xua�tEc oSe7 ��, Tow►n..p � e 1 West of the Wi_ layette. 1Mer`idi Of Tigard, � an, tl � �� t South,' �tar� • C �►w or washingtcz and State of Oregon, deso: i follmist ileqinnitv at a , . point on ,s,eotY.ota. l�.rie between Sa�t�.s 13 ar,td ' , �ownship 2 S. th, Range 1 West of 'Lite Wi11sme a Meridian, in the County mf Wadi and State of Oregon, of the Northeast corm of Sec ._'Ac 14; �� 9� x Son thence u� West 4 0 1/3 3 redS a tract heretofore ded to 514d U e Shaver; thence South, 20 feet; thence East �/� r�L� to 'section ; trenCC Worth 20' feet to the p lace of beginning. f l� • Subs iv sion /Partition Repo Section C, Fxcepticns Continued 2. Sub ectt prc pe cy is under ;public ownar.�sh:45 and is tax exempt. n p roll ma change in ,Cx�as�e:r�sh�. prior �p ��:? delivery of , ass�s9ttt�C'it result in tax liability. (Affects ?arrels :1 through V, inclusive) Mu►�.cipal if . of Tigard. ` 3 . �, liens, en,.t, any, imposed by the Cary DOTE. An in inquiry has been directed to the City Clerk, asequuant ,., has ty Clerk arm,. ,. the actual Status of such liens. Nr'+ advice will ,�o1�.C7w' concerning � " search has been made or ' will be made for water, sewer or storm drainage charges unless the City claims t iran: as liens and reflects the on its lien, docket on or before the date of closin g s " iate City bureau o� waer t sewer �.ed should check with the appropriate da.e�trict and obtain a final reading. Such charges at in eSCrcM m 49 The subject; property lies within. the boundaries of the Unified Sewerage Agency and is subject to the lc r ee and asssssrnents thereof. g public utilitieS, rights of the public, gc�,rexx��ental bodies, an;�. 5. in and to that portion of the herein described property lying within the limit s of roads and highways. 6. Any u r ., t tainty as to the location of the South boundary lie of Parcel I and the North boundary line of Parcel 11 7. Any adverse a affecting` title to or Lin rations upon use of Parcel '/111, arising by reason of provi lion in Deed recorded August 2, 1911 Book Page 288, said "is deeded for a right of way in i3oa��,, 89, Pa e 288 � parcel for a mad to the grantee therein: 8 An easement _created or disclosed by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated ; February 9, 1952 Record February 13, 1952 in Book 329 Page 222 For Roadway Affects West 16 feat: of Parcel 1 ed or discloses. by instrurr ent, including the terms .eof, February 16, 1953 February, 18, 1951 in Book 341 Page 413 OW er of Parcel IV Ingress arid egress A portion of Parcel 11 9. An ease cr and pr,'isioa'�s Dated Recorded In favor of For Affects 10. ` Easements for ingress err: egress oc ;r Parcels 1 and Ii. in C act' Affects ° 16 foot strips ps of lane as `described s r.� t and Supp1^"? ,�n ,��y t�_ - 1966 in Book .612, Page; �t�3 1968 in Book 722, Page 993 and . such ac�,; ' recorded August 22, strip .. 9� �tianal November 4, �� reasonable and necessary to connect the strips of and described in said contract suppl ants . 11. An easement dated or disclosed by s. � ent, inc'.lu� the terms and provisions 'ref, , Dated N .. --rchi 27, 1974 • April a.1 1974 in B 970 ` Page 199 Recorded , In favor of • The public For : Utilities Affects F, '!"; ort:ism of Parcel 2. An ease t created and xh pL'�pli�.�lot)a Dated Recorded Iii fravor of For Affects or raise. osed by instrument, incl rr the terms ereof, November 13, 1978 November 27, 1978 as Recorder's Fee Wo 78051784 Unified Sewerage Agency of iriatVington City Sewer Exact location cast determined. ftom the information pr ,0 d in the recorded e'b 13. An easement created or disclosed by inst u-, ent, including g the terms and provisions thereof, 1987 October 8, Dated � Re�orRecorded Nove e 2, 1987 as Recorder s Fee Ncoo 87055034 In favor of City of Tigard For Sewer Affects A portion s of Parcels VI and VII 14. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, ea sezments �nc /or sethackf including rdng the terms and provisions thereof, imposed by instrument, June 25, 1992 92Q5 Dated w �c *�,�.� 16 ;fig er s Fee No e Recorded � .. r J'�.. 27, 1992 as Recorder for, the partition or subdivision of land, under Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 92. Violation may subject a psr.srin tr..) ocnviction under penaltiet of law. FurthennOre, the proposed v)liC1 will not poovide coverage against violation of these statute.s. �. proposed :....s.ct ti: iriae ha subject to statutory r u i -B��' sqlooL DISTEIC 233, WASHINGTO' COUNTY, OWN ' (which.. adtpixfAd title as Union High Y ►J Tigard, Washington Gau► r, Cam' , as °Tigarca' Ik& in Hig Sal ' No.. 2 Jot.) w tV Prc is I sugh V, `USi� j s ND C ! iZ LAMB e AND A� as tenants ' by the entirety as to °. nu Di`ri l l) 2 intere ,AND R.A. GRAY AND LINDA D. ►Y, as tenants by the e tixety, asp tQ kan :undivided j4` interest, all as tenants in citron, as to Parcels VI,; V I and, VIII SE a O ,S I Ater ti ,r&. PURCHASZR$ Kennet Hire 141 rittoPErtItiltt 1 1 11111 111 41 4.1 11 / 411I401 41.1 44 Leo 4 i4, 'i2rr R1V4 ' W,M1 , a1�, pox 11 .+ 4! 7 4 1 .. J.1 i (4 1 li 4 1•..yK �.KK 1 1,7 11, 11../44 11 4 .II 1,I 04 414141 .Y lr 111 YI 1 1 1� 11 I 1 1 4414.41+4 4 1, 1 tarcharera Iereby ' t,tg lee to amend the Cbove desr�\z.�ib�ed x ul 4 . 1 1114111 1 11 Y 1 411 4111441 .+1104 111 11',11 4 :11 0 1 aoct lite i.0 by " ada i�4" t1le f s . ow .4 ' of 40111' 441 14441Iw44.411...41 414110,11 x1.1.4141 444140 1 ♦ ..:;14 44 � 1`�I�►1 , htiltobk44 eig ,e ' t "ottlitatitki ' eia ° del' ail t► 'l, irie>�t on the form ar i with the {y re+�liire4 'byy the city:. of YyI61 a . �ot ;. f property. This easement sh I t l executed . (yyy u be at s,1 .4 4 V 144.0 111011141114441141.11 i 1111 1 1114 +. 41 of 01 1 441 1 41 i 1 1' 4. I 441 14.1 i .4 411 44.4 144 II 1 111 11114 1 1 r 11 1 0 7 4 41 4V1. � I 4.11 1 1 '411 144 2 Sellers hereby agree to execute all s . �1 i unib �.Mt+ Yi d x11 11]]YY))��1.��.pi 1��7 that ��'1.i� y��Y{��■ ��y! 0 I I ` 41111 '1" 111 1 A11t1Jt•t.� t4+_` t �!'• i MI �� y Tltigi sold and/or �yypptm�p:(aot� l�jyx�e future p1attin .o11A�� ■�yp the �.1; Property., ,) 4 Y 11 1441 ny 1. 4El ueh4doaWatrit ...•eltoc T+ ed ' 011�4i 1'4 bti 1 e toU �`1 ,N.a , f i•.p1Ya1 ,11.. AI olosi g'o 1 1444 4 11411 4111 11..141014 61 1144 41104 1 +1 41 44 44 r 411111/ • IY 11 4 .111.1 14t 4 .1 11441 4 44110 444.41 014 4+1141 41.4 0 Li0 1111441 /' 1 1 Al 9.14 1 111 114 4'. 441 1 1 1 1 4 4 ll l 14 + 1 11 44111.1 11 1 + 44 41 1 4 1 1 411, 4114 I/ • _'11 1 4l • .11111 • 'Y VV1441401'.4146 i+ .. 1;111 441 i 441.. 1 ` en trilayrot 4141 4'1 14 1.11 lil 4 4 044 01411411 1.14 44.4 4114411 i 11 141 114. i 14' 4111 4 ( 4441141 ;J. .1x1 1 144144.: 1 41 . 4 . .4 1441 1 1 1 1111{11/ • !.1�'IF� q, es l.. Slam '. 1 tgned, ,,-- IN �i 4+_/ ilrliii14.1. 4 /'^{,4/' .4`...f 1. 144 i. 1. 1 11 4 1' it 111 111 411 1 11 11 '411141 41 4 4 11141 444 4414,4444,11" 1414 f4 044 1w1 0 4 4. 4 Yi 41 111 44 . 1 14 4 �- ^... 0 ( I , 1 : 4 4 1 1 414 44 1 . 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1..'111 44 41141 41 44+ 1441114 *SI 1 1 4 1 1 • • 4 411N 11 1111.4{ 1 (+1111 ill.l 11 i i 1 11114 11111 ll 1 {i 1111 11 1 (( if 1114 i 4.1 r'. 5,41 040119 11 6 41i11 414 14 1111 114.1 1 4141441 11 61.:14 i4 4,444.st4+1111.44 4 4 44 1414441411. 1 11144 { ;1.11110 11 1 lil4r 1 4 411 :0 44■• 111 I I .11111 11.1140 4546 011 :1 a 4#.1#1 #4,..HI* 54.55445* 44 if %i YI 114 4::1+41,1.• •Ii *0 1 111. iiwJ1 1 .14 i1.. its :. 1111 1 1 1444 i. 1101 11114.4 111 114 1 4.:111111 4 4 11 5 4 1 . 1. 114 .41 ( 4141111111 11.441...41.44 114111144444.14044.411111444 441.1 14 1 i)1 • 4i 11441.1 11114 1144 41 40414 64 11111141 46 4 111114141111' 144. 1141 .1.440 • 44 {. 4 4 1 1 1 4 , .141114 445 0 4 ' 1 4 4 . 1 4 1 i , . . 4 4 4 4 6 4 0 + 114 44 / 714:41 .11110411414+44 1114..1 4 11441 7 1 4 4 44 4 41 6 1110. 441 14 1 ill 411444 .' 44 41 11 1 11111119; 4019 11+11 44 144 li 11,4 1 1 111 14 1 111.441 111 64 1. 1+104111 1+1 11'.44111144 111144141061114114114.44+44 1 44..44/.4.4 1 i..14.44.4.114,4441,1i4111•4l L11i111f41i 1i Y1110i.1r4.4 414 6444.4441.14141 41 41:0 .44010111 41 111 .1 44 '441 it 1 44 .4+1 f 41111141.44141141141111. 11 44. 4.■ 6 1 `i. 44 441 4 41 04111 1 I+. 1 41171 444 i 1411 44111 1• 1' 1 011114 11 li Y1 1 I 114644 .4 11 44011tH 11114 144.44 4140141' i4Yi 4+40 144111141 41, 1i 111' 1( 1'1'44 44 %Y • 11,6 4 4.94941114441 i• 411114144w1i 444 f9 /14.4 144444x1 7 11,411.414 .- 1141/441 41 4444�I1 Y 14144/11491 14/4111111 • 174+ 14 1 4 14444/141 4 71, +1' +1ij /41 {1401, 01 4114 ; 41 . 141 441411 14114411.6 1 .11 40 14..1114 441 14 i J1 rbOhi Nil. 696 OA S�d��no 9loi ►aar Pubitot C4. pW +11in�1 tutaon 9 204 14111 1 14114:441144140141 { 11.111411114 I.Y 114111:4 44444+ 44444411. 144144. I 1141444.414 41.444 -Ir440 4r 14'1 • SOLAR BLDG LINE LOTS 1 Nom__ ORIENTATIQhi . t,. EXEMP .L 0l S�'oea.s�e..e ..... RRte... `` { , tr EXIST T�{., ;z 'SETBAI.`.K 74 €Mil i N , DENSITY /COST' 4Etn �` • ° O-_, jj _ P P.----..-.-...-.... • •. , /-,,, .e 89'-'5:5—' .7- a9c7s-sq i.e.;_, ek9a$5 •. ao. Se, '3'. 99" .x° _.a' . , s,C � " �d A 8 ..........-- ....a. ri./..- a ' .et - -- I •...N...•. It.• ..f ..N.. H.. SUMMARY: TOTAL it 0 LQ-I S� ii SOLAR OI 'li SOLA[t LOTS,' LOTS ME:E HNG BASIC REQUIREMENT IOtS MEE1ING SOLAR BUILDING LINE, E.OTS USING:20% EXEMPTION= LOIS�EXLNIN'i;ED FOR CAUSE NOTES: — . ustitirution attached ter all tots except :those exempted under 2OVo exemption .Standard. 1 Even lots`w:3ch are exempted .must meet setback ceq!. r -Tt if they would shads a 1011 which is not :exempted °° -Even tots whicfl are oxemp1e I�ltf�l:fnt'ui Se & I a: Ol 19.03 LO.Tg•<..., •I T •\wwliaww. IrIHwIHIHw+awwr wwfewltwHH•He•aH SETBACK AEt�L a 0 . e0 . - IwIN1Hfw/w1•Hww NwHefwHe•awwawwa:H3f fy ''13C ! ,t .5AS1C REQUIREMENT 1• a.wtH ,• `e ,,4 3;, DIME S14?L - ' na�waifi•0.1- •Hr)HI�i � � s / LOTS .QRIENTATIOIL CA ° .fry .i`%^.7� - S.S. SOLAR BLDG LINE LOTS - ' � : :: o '- XFMPT .... .N•{.1. • 1 O� �. ; � 20% EXEMPTLQI I-- DENSITY /CO,L •wH•. \awcw.fi - a �: o - 7, • Hs:�waswlawf =CK f.1•tft •t _DlSTAN(. ! • - <•N•wNN•F. t, ' el egO ' IIIIINIIIIIIIIII MI ..... 0 2 ®° �` / ��. ,a m.o. . a .yi ' `` Z r s .� .. r 242 O` I • D5", ,. .. 0■. ., -.. • - y........D... .....e..... • — .Mtw•taNal]L• - MI' t11f• {I s 1C4* w•\NttHC.t�D _ . NHH.•oiw..1••. HNHNf.if•• tf.•Hf \w•wwHw \� - •O.N•tHrJDH a': \N .D.wH•r1•.r� - w•✓ `' ... -^c - - • -. M••w { 4., _ _ •c? � _ . . ,+p• •r N•• •.:: -•otw' +1 - _.. Ntt1 :\f.'-'_. w1 . - ILO�rclw.••t+tHa +nlHaa• 1\ Ntlf• H• f. H.{{ Iw{{ IHI1•IHH•HIwN11.w{:wwf1•Hlttf•1 1 fa1Nf•DHw fl.f1 w.w.f \•1\•H IIHHfat.NwfH1.�a \f.N.• - - - •wr_w1\�nawlw.Iw ewfw�1 • .• 110.6.161666.1660,061■611.6.■6101.6.6.1061. .166...0 .... N MI - .•t•. i..• • -•.- 771 SUMMARY : NM TOTAL it OF LOTS • LOTS MEETING BASIC tr'EOUIREMENT EWIILDING.LINE �_.._.— .. X SOLAR LOTS . i LOTS ;MEEI!NG;SOI >R • - w...._.,..... •.•...�..�._._. ION .• '20 °� % SOLAR LO I S 20% I OTS' USING EXEMFi' — ---r -,- _..ww - LO IS EXLMPT ED FOR CAUSE ''' ,---. NO1 ES. .;usURcat ... M,..• ..... n - Attached faw r all lots except ept those exempted under 20% exemption standard. w.. .1....V ..„.a.nm.m 11 Ihnx would shnda a lot which Is not exempted °° -Even tots whicfl are oxemp1e I�ltf�l:fnt'ui Se & I a: Ol 19.03 STREET DEDICATIdg, 1 1KNOW ill )V 8Y'YAESePEtSENI : that Rainier Rank_Oreron :N.A•,' do heri+by dedicate to the Public a perpetual right - of -way for street, • road and uti;L Q;,/ purposes on, over across, under, aloni, rn'4 within the following described real properP,) in Washington County, Oregon; SEE REMSE S,ED6 To have. and to "old the above - described and forever for uses and purpte.s hereinaboy. stated.' The grantor(s' hereby covenants that they am property is free of all liens and entumbrancea, thy their rights sboye- described, and they will pay al,t on the property. ! I wo..n.E tl i �ht►1 u�eto the Public the owner in fee sisaple e,d r the have good,and legal right to grant taxes and assessments due and owing The aeoOnt paid for this dedication is kEp. amount unt la.due from City. See Attached agreement for detail. IN WITNESS WHE,::OP, the undersigned corporation has caused this Street Dedicatl to be executed by, its duly authorized, undersi ned ,officers acting pursuant' 24 i resolution of ire Board of Directors. Council, return to Rink Ca by City ff . NOTE. Upon a roval and acceptance at Rainier Bank Oregon, phone, number: .293- 7157. DO NOT SEND FOR RECO'RE INC Rainier Sank Oregon, N.A, Nerve of Corporation • STATE OF'ORECON )t +«, ) fig.' e. r� CO Nay P WASnicacrON) ' , , 9. Tim patrieic and Ric, Gaffall Personally appeared ,,.....„._.... o, each lbeing Mira' dilly ,sworn, did say t 'tr, ormer •is.,...w: the vice ,,, president antra that the Latter Is the Y . ant ' of Rdi�e r cosation and that the Deal affixed tI - corporation corparattoa and that said ineitrume t,um signed and weal d in behalf of geld o by of it bow r,+A B y ofcd. .e �... i ' a S, • to be its voluntary act and of disc tv a,. e;1d each of then acknowledged said. instrument �/ • .. , .� y4� ,�0.0.. . hand and seal this 2l� st.: ° y 3,��OF, 1 heave hereunto set ay oo ` •_ ,_41aguvt p Q o a .9.87 . r d, :, t0 i'i o Notary lie for Oregon .. :', : A .. D Hy Coaam gsion Expires .3/27%68 ,� ^fir Ap roved' 9dtn't 11`esei descrir;.tion this , - ; dry of aC . • +j. p F ...le . P 217 24A Rdttttn recorslid tot RECORDE % 0 CITY OP TIGAID P. 0 ti©3rM 23397„ °dlGini t , 0R 97225 EXII1BIT A' 42355.E. Clviston St, . Phan. Portierd, 0R. 97206 Y (513) ° 236 -4646 Job No. 87 -16 July 114./987 Legal pescriptioni H., city of Tigard *Washington Count . Oregon, bent, ; R A lttractt of land situated ,n the N.B. 1/4 of Section 14, being described as follows. Beginning at an iron rod in the East line of S.W. 92nd Me., CO. Road No. 2076 (25 ft from .lenterlino), which point bears YO 89 deg. 58 Hain. 57 sec. V a distance of 1,359.82 ft. and S 00 deg. ' 01, min. V a distance of • 1, 485.00 ft. from the Hortheaat ,corner that g. 0 � is along the Vest line o!: that `tract of land described as Tract 2 in deed to John Scheckia, SectiGn 1.A, •thence S 0 de 0� said. recorded in Book 156, Page Records of Washington county, a distance of 50.00 ft.' to an iron rod; , thence t3 69 deg. 50 *sec. V a distance of 2.99 ft. to the East line of i7.Ve 92nd A',e' Co. Road do 2076; thence" tracing amid East lino 50.12 ft. along the arc of a 434.26 ft. radius curve to the left through a central angle of 6 deg. 36 mitt. 45 sac. (the chord of which, hears id 3 deg. 26 miry. 19 sec. B, 50.09 ft.) to the Point of beginning.. This description 15 based on a survey by JohnYYC. Reppeto,.Oregon P1.8 No 657, • dated ,April 13, 19874 and filed under Washington'. County Surveyor's Office Recording Ho 22,315. • Y p • '; , • , , 41bar. Y iy 4.4.,4 i Y ;j : : 1 jot ',OM, w•. i.Y.. ...ii i.i. .,Y: • • 471,F7 •'r • ti j •r,. • err: s _ • .,r•j. f y "u � •� i•1 l ,�., ,:i 'l %r• t " bra :'r'�.; . ♦ rf'�• .�.. +f ,• ,. • " Sr WHERRASs E.A. Cray and Linda D. Cray and A.C. Lamb And Zeds Lamb (First Part ?) desire RAINIER DANK OREGON, H.A. (Second Percy) to convey that certain piece of .property described in Exhibit A attached, and shown in attached Exhibit ffi, to the City► of Tigard as public Right of way, in order to provide access from S.W. 92nd Avenue to first Parties property. In aOnsideration of second parties willingness to covey said. property to the City of Tigard, First Party *grows to pay to Second Party the sus of by Citj. .r ;. $3►,000.00. This sun to be paid upon execution o1( documantation r • i of Tigard. �j. . t � a reed to writing by both patties. �l h d void t�n�css extended and g become r� If not fully conaumat�.d b �e tcmbar � 1987, this Agreement shell YI Pt s ' SECOND P1S& 1. D ite .iar�inr�,y 4 • • • • ote:A it or ookitosi c iieiehf. 44, • I. Dona& W. Mika, trivia* b! ktifieWoeht and Tmxebon ind ai.l fl io R000nti + Vie. Cote Wiya c* !of s 1d c unfy. ►'kt WOW 1004, than wftt1n MtEnxroon! iu1 aan'!+np a�tie iisa�ed end raaoonfiud W 1wali of isr:frde a *WI 664644 D2a►bld W Mahlon. DhoL 4t d „ Mi+t�arwn! Old Tatxt�ioci, � (moo *whim:wit y trSt'37'• !r Si.s.. a�L GREENWAY DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN by THESE PRESENTS, that Waverly Construction Co. Inc. an Oregon Corporation ao" h e re-d catte to the Public for Cream/ay purposes t o furaTim described real Premises in Washington County, Oregons See attached legal description To have and to hold the above - described. and dedicated rights unto the Public forever for thtr linen and purposes hereinabove stated The grantor(s) hereby covenants that they are the ovner(o) in fee simple and the property is free of all 7:, 'ena and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant tNe rights above - described, and they will pay all taxes and anaccaments due and owing on the property. The amount paid for thin dedication in t NIL • WITNESS nrc!�cutedby i,ts du'lyE corporation h to be authorized, undersigned officers acting pursuant to resolution Y of f its Board of ©irecture. ' `ri,' Waverly Construction Co, Inc. ,', f . ,+ a Nilmu of Corporal on Corprare Seel By: .. ` ,e r si eat /i ., `''''}`} STATE O OREGON ) sad COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) Auruot , 19.x. here 'Wally appeared Ruhnot.h .G. WA miro and liobortn .A, .W, oymirn,_,_ w ao eci,e be hg L�ir" C�ic u y scio n; d,tiai say tat ado " a ms e prddident and that the latter in the aocretnry of Wmper, ly C, oh &L'ructi.on. Co, Inc.,, g g „; a corporation, and Said the seal affixed to tie foregoing instrument is the corporate seal Of Sa „d cog otiation and that said g p tion by nuthority of its board�ofnd recbp rn Weand eacheofethem aaknowledgadasnidpinstrument to b� Ito volutntury act and, dped, Secretary tdry P i ll' c f'or Oregon y Commis:iOn ertpiresf Ar cEu'TANCG %. 1,, o\ CiOty Attorney City of !fgacd ' j ,� dd of U Ltc'r" AppYoved ae tip legal descriptioh ty;i � / ' )` a 19 • . r � r qi ,'► y "C ) of T gar ',it .i hsoiii + ,e , IT A' n ,t pt), yt th,e , idky Council thin inCe�w ).iv day of r' . :�i,,k . ` + a (OUNC11 . O IWY (tf Iti RO . O R GON r [ �n- +, S, ft p, k �� by Y i 00 4 ity of, Tigard ityReco r rde 1 agaalliWrinr , a . :4rv.��ti,w,� ZUBJE".T: LEGAL DFZGRIPTION -- CITY PARK TRACT A tract of land being a portion of the William Graham D.L.C. '39 in the southeast 1/4 of Section 2, T-2-S, R -1 -W W.M., CitY of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as followtc: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 28, Chelsea 1431., a subdivision of record, said northwest corner also being the initial point of said Chelsea Hill; thence N 43 °i2'3i" W 235,141 fef,,t to a point on the West line of the srtid Graham D,L.C. : thence N 42 °S8'03 E 319,38 feet along said q.L,C, lth , to the most northerly corner of that tract described in Sock )11746 , P3 ,e 608, `Deed Records, Washington County, Oregon; thence» 8 65°34'08"S 234.46 feet along the northerly line of saki tract described in Book 1046 Page 608 to the most },: rtherly corner of that t:raat in deed to the City of Tigard, Fee No. 8549i','2 i thence S 41°27'26"W 490,50 feet to the; point of be4inning, Coitt,tning 2.34 acres, to • IY��:,Y tlr �• ,t r9 A, irit;r'NWAY tot C:6 triciuo STATE OREta0ri et CoUnty Of Wtehitifton I, •t)onnid W. Mason, Clroctor of Aanohttmtint told Tnxrsflon tend EK•Offlolo pocotdCr of (;on= VooytnotiO ft* bald county, do hoPOby Corflfy ihdt tiro Within lhsfrUmanl of Vlrftlnd Woo oocoiVod road toaordad In booll Of rectlrdn of sate, county,, Donofd W. Mason, +Sitootot of Aosodthiotit ofnd Td+katfon, 6"g Offfcla County Clark 29 o- X5300124 glo 0 ∎,15400 ',6 31 5500 ro 32 5 i0C) 33 'e 570OµVA 34 YAW 5610 X155 h 5900 36 ti 6000 �0 l 's.«. S SOW to "i�lln .4:117.4 �Y 3100 Ytl 47 O0 c 4600 .J 23 Ltd 4400 21 • 400c ivri"L:i.1x.+.i..kL1L.iN�+�+H•4 it ik To 'have end to hold the a bove-dese7lbed and ,dedieeted tightd„ Unto 41110i, 0 corPorsticc end Ina iturent *me signed and sealed in behalf of, Said:: cotpotiti!bnAiy,auiharitirliiiittgit. bearil diteetore and each them, ,a71., diet and deed. ' 4 oidA ,p f,01,,44, 44 046:tkre,,r4,00 ltVAINdOlder41-ii'41tYft0 ger,:mAsii For: ' cKELSEY OILL'it!HASE I),P4rk Land' A tract of 1itd‘in the southeiist f4 of Station '44'. 7.2-S W • Ti grd, idtis rigton tounty • , Oregon 0 more particularlY described a oi Os.: -,Betliiinig at the northwest ,corner of that tract 'deitribed in deed to ,Owen Setyckir in Book 514, Pag2 '364 Wtithington Cctunty Oee Records ; thence 3'36'30W 320.88 feet; thence N-66°542Y"-W, 74.22 feet; thence 6,-48°00'32°-44, 89.36 1,a6t; thence along a '140.00 foot radltiS clArve'with r central .angie of .. • , 73°11,13".an F,trc distane of 179.60 feet beg to the right of till egord which • " bears N-78°37814H-W 167.06 feet; thence N-62*27'614 1 10.70 feet; thencil,1 3-76°00'00"-W 90.66 feet; thence N-41°27126°-E 430 feet to a point On the southerly line of that tract described in F ee No. $3.-000916 to the City of Tige.rd; tNence S-65°34'08°,,E 234.60 feat along said southerly ,line to the' Point of .ntainiflg 3.18 acres. I, bdridld VV. Matan, Asseedmotit ehd Took 01 ond Ex-Officio glocdreide of Oon oyd.ndad Ode dtkI 0,:clunty. tkt liott.tby orilfy thot 014 0141.1s1 fr)dtt-diddi•i r4 .vegqj w rocolvdd 4dott of rmoAks of 0,d1r31Colotty, 0mM W, km*" r of Ati.VAsea&t3 & TaXittlion, Ex- C161.A" • g.a.oneklo4fittli.010A410.1r,pletatee,' tia$P4 crimot.to or ittit titC, liALL s»64 *red le'doka'AeatiOr‘tats • . ',....1';':.'-;:?"',17%,1:`,'" ft. ■,.:",i, .4, t ,"/, t.,. z.„ xny [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]