The URL can be used to link to this page

SUB1993-00004POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. �4J171 ,vYxr MME 'SEMI:.... "PATE TIeli OTQ� AVF/DAVIT OF NAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Wa hington City of Tigard being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath That I served NOTICE OF toUBLIC HEARING / That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR A copy (Public Hearing tice/Notice of Exhibit "A") was mailed to aach named attached list marked exhibit "B" on the said notice NOTICE OF DEC/SION as her to bulletin ho rd on the Mt., day of in the United States Mail on the I__ postage prepaid. City of Tigard Planning DirectOr )Pigard Planning Commission Tigard. Hearings Officer 'Tigard City Council Decision) of which is attached (Harked persons at thI.addresel shown orA the _Jjdyof attached, was post.l,,A771.7-4iii.roPrIiFe 192.17,1L; and dciposlped day of AR Y PUBLIC OF CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINS, ORDER BY HEARINGS OFFICER 1. Concerning Case Number(s): SUB 93-0004 SLR 93 -0003 2. Name of Owner: Edward Finle Naee of Applicant: Tom Mille' Builder 3. Address 15454 SW Edggwater Ct. City Tigard o. Address of Property: 14010 SW Hall Boulevard Tax Map and Lot No(s) : 2S1 12BB tax lot 200 5. Request: The applicant requests Subdivision preliminary plat into nine lots ranging between 15, 000 and 11, 850 squares »P p approximately are feet approval to divide a axce�. of a roxixrtatel 1 69 �. in size. A sensitive Lands approval is requested to allow a ground disturbance of approximately 30 to 35 cubic yards in a wetland. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 1E1.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18.108, 18. 114, 18,150, 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. Zone: P.7 (Residential, 7 units /acre) The R-7 zone allows single family attached or detached residential units, duplexes, public support facilities, farming, manufactured homes, home occupations, family day care, and accessory structures among other uses. 6. Action: Approval as requested X Approval with conditions Denial E4iuJp4 f+ State OR Zip 92223 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall, and mailed to: X of record The Owners Owners ,then(:) within the required distance The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision :. THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON May 21s 1993 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. hlanartment, Tigard City Hall,�n13125�SWcan Planning De fact, decision, and statement bera �ota�.ned from the findings of � i Valle P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision ire: accordance with 18.32.290(B) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a wr -ten appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The a , -' rn City fc a and must* be accompanied by eat may the i peal.afee $3 5 00) and transcript costs (varies Up to a maxim= of $500.00). The deae ine for filing of an appeal i.s 3:30 p.m. May, 21, 1093 10. questions. If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639- - 4171. ,} iii a e ;. 1 k ,: a p, BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON In the matter of an application by Tom Miller for FIN rage_ � Edward and Lois Finley for approval of a preliminary ) plat for an 8 -lot ;land division in the R-7 zone aryl :fora ) SLR 93 -0003 sensitive lands review for a wetland modification at ) SUB 93 -0004 14010 SW Hall Boulevard in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Colony Creek Estates 6) ] 1NDIN 1. The hearings officer hereby adopts and incorporates herein the findings of the Tigard Community ]Development Depqrtment Staff Report dated April 16, 1993 (the "Staff Report "), including the summary, findings about the site and surroundings, applicable approval standards, NPO and agency comments, and evaluation of the request. 2. The hearings officer conducted a duly notice public hea ring regarding the application on April 26, 1993. The hearings officer held open the record for three business days to receive additional testimony and evidence, a. City planner Ron Pomeroy summarized the Staff Report. He noted that tax lot 200 can be divided into as many as six lots for single family drrvelhngs. He argued that the subdivision should be redesigned to provide access to tax lot 200 from Fanno Creek Drive, consistent with section 18.108.060(B). This can be done by reducing the number of lots on the west side of the street from three to two and re- orienting those lots 90 degrees, so that their long dimension is north - south. If this change is made, then the depth to width ratio would be less than 2.5:1, and a variance to that standard would not be needed. He recommended that the hearings officer deny the lot width -to -depth ratio variance, because the variance is not necessary if the lots are re- oriented. He introduced a memo from ODOT in which ODOT staff also recommend future access to Fanno Creek Drive (although misidentifi ed as Colony Creek Drive) instead of Hall Boulevard consistent with ODOT policy. City engineer Chris Davies argued in favor of requiring the applicant to provide access to tax lot 2Cre nom Fanno Creek Drive by reviewing the reasons for limiting access to aaa arterial, i.e., to maintain the caCrying capacity of the arterial and minimize the interruptions in traffic flow. b. Bill McMonagle testified for the applicant. (1) He asked where the City wants him to put the bicycle path, Mr. Pomeroy responded that it was the applicant's choice. (2) He argued in favor of the lot depth -to -width ratio variaces and against Condi� n of approval 3, which requires that access , c.. provided t aedo �x lot 200 00 1 o_ h Fanno Creek �" ve. Ha pointed out that there is an improved access drive rom to lot 200 to Hall Boulevard aligned with the McDonald Street centerline. That access drive contains a trip wire that triggers t h e signal at the Hall/McDonaJd intersection. The signal and its wire provide for safe and efficient acce ss from tax lot 200 directly to Hall Boulevard. Allowing access from that lot (and from the single family home on tax lot 701 to the north and to toedevelopment m that could occur on those lots) would not disrupt the flow of traffic on Hall Boulevard or cause hazardous traffic conditions. If ODOT issues a road approach Bch r�rn'tt for the 200 from Creek Drive. Tom Miller, Y not have to pP P d, then the applicant should no o de access to r e o er, Lois and Edward provide nd Sven Von k�lvideken testy :red that the access drive to Hall Boulevard is safe, Finley y based on their experience using it. Page a -- Hearings Officer s Final Order SLR 93 -0003 and SUB 93 -0004 (Colony Park Estates j (3) He testified that lot 127 will have access directly to Fanno Creek Drive only, and agn+ed to impose a non - access strip where that lot abuts the private street on Tract "A" implement mplement that restriction: He argued that only 6 lots will have access to the private street with this restriction, including lots 122 through 126 and one proposed lot in SUB 93 -0'6 to the north. Mr. Pomeroy argued that seven mils will have access to the private p by applicant, because the applicant proposes to build a duplex on lo 22, therefore, the number f units tserved by the private street exceeds Code standards. Mr. McMonagle argued about how to construe section 18.108.070, i.e., g g whether it refers to lots or units. c, Mitzi and Dennis Cockerham testified with concerns about the adequacy of the wetland delineation and the impact of filling the wetland on drainage to the south. They argued against allowing the filling and against removal of trees from the site. about y d �a t16m, and John bartolomnew testified wi th concerns about the adequacy' Colony . , Hall Boulevard until of � d from the site and other subdivisions runld r consideration. These ssb minions should not he approved unt Fanno Creek `Drive extends to Hall Boulevard north of SUB 93 -0003 (Bridgep ark). Jun Burgers offered testimony, recommended against allowing construction traffic Colony Creek Drive. bn Beckman also testified with concerns about Colony Creek Drive and about drainage impacts, noting she has water in her ba4,entent 3. After the hearing, the applicant introduced a slightly revised plat on which proposed lots 126 and 127 are re- oriented 90 degrees so their long dimension is east -west. The applicant proposed a non - access strip on the north edge of the northerly of the two y 4, i lots, so that both lots would have vehicular access to Fanno Creek Drive and not to the private street on Tract "A ". Only 6 units would have access to the private street if this plat revision is approved, DISCUSSIQN 1. The first disputed issue in this case is whether filling the small wetland on the permitted. Section 18.84 040(C) contains standards for filling ' g fill d site should be ermitt Hitt a ,wetland (see page 14 of the Staff Report). In summary, the staff concluded that the fill would not have a significant 'pact on drainage, because the volume of fill is small, the ales of fill would not be paved and would be "mitigated" by landscaping of lots, and stotu' water from the fill area and the remainder of the site will be collected and discharged to Fanno Creel The hearings officer recognizes that development will 'rrodify the existing drainage patterns on the a site,, and concerns about those changes iwithout t more do not rebut the evidence that storm water will be collected and ais r bSed consistent with ,ne City Code., 'There is no substantial evidence that storm water from the site is reasonably likely to be discharged off-site inappropriately as a result of the proposed filling. Therefore, the hearings officer finds that the filling will not cause significant adverse drainage impacts for the reasons in the Staff Report. 2 The second issue in this case is whether the private street on Tract "A" complies with section 18„108.070. : . up The ' t a a private street. The hearings officer finds the section is vague. I'he hearin s officer access to private street. a That section allows u to 6 tint :ots � to have � '' . g ... � fficer fines the purpose of the section is to limit the intensity of traffic on a private street To fulfill that purpose, the section should be construed so that up to 6 units or up to 6 lots or some combination of the two can be served by a private street: This maintains an equivalent functional cap on the Puce 2 - -- kearings Officer's Final' Order SLR 93 -0003 and SEIB 93 -0004 (Colony Park Estate 6) .rt+ 1. . a gip,. ri♦ q {II ,xn Y� .: W i :M t.l Y' p� tD h n,yi q w; t �i' s bey a 4d µ 1iii *.G. °a l.r , t: � jr 's. ��!� .L b' t ! ry; aP�t � i ' ,� i.�tr: - 6 • 1 ,.i '� ;t IIMESINDERENSMENOW AN number of vehicle trips on a private street regardless of the form of housing the street serves Therefore, whether the street serves sax lots on which separate single family homes are built or a_6-unit apartment complex on one lot or two triplexes or three duplexes, etc., the regulation has the same effect. There is no apparent, public policy reason to vary the impact of the section based on the housing type served by the street. The interpretation caged by Mr. Mclvionagle would disregard the uwc;d d "unit" and focus exclusively on the word "lot ". That interpretation would disregard the purpose for the section. b. The plat revision submitted by the applicant after the hearing appears to remedy the problems raised by staff at the hearing. That is, by re- orienting lots 126 and 127 so their long dimension is east -west and prohibiting access from the north lot lo the private street, only four lots and five units will have access to the private street from SUB 93 -0004 and one unit will have access from SUB 93 -0006. Therefore, the private street will comply with section 18.108.070, subject to conditions that ensure appropriate changes are made to the preliminary plat, including re-orienting lots 126 and 127 and establishing a non- access strip along the north edge of the northerly lot. 3. The third issue is traffic safety in the area generally and at Colony Creek Drive and Hall Boulevard in, particular until Fanno Creek Drive is extended north to Hall BoulevardA and the Hall/Colony Creek intersection is closed as planned. Residents of the g p approved until Fanno Creek area to the south argued that the development construction � cess from Hall Boulevard to Drive is extended to Hall Boulevard and that Colony C mk Drive and vice-versa � and adjoining land to •tt�e raises a logical problem. To wit, unless development of this prohibited. However, ass r north is approved, the extension of Faun® Creek Drive to Hall Boulevard will no�� occur. Prohibiting future development effectively impedes a solution to the problems that have resulted from past development. The hearings officer understands and appreciates the limitations of the Hall/Colony Creek intersection and of the access fiom the site to Bonita Road. However, the hearings officer that the best way to address those constraints is to authorize the proposed subdivision (together with SDR 92 -0020, SUB 93- 00039 and SUB 93- C'006) subject to condit;'one at the road extension will occur consistent with the authority of the City. The hearings officer is satisfied that a reasonably prudent � r motorist can safely navigate the Hall/Colony Creek intersection. There is ample albeit impaired sight distance. The volume of traffic turning through the intersection does not appear to create significant level of service problems, perhaps because of the nearby signal • • Y i. . -- .. ... that use ...... • s �tion as a at McDonald. The additional incrernentalvolume fewer than 100 vehicle tree per day ased on, result of the proposed subdivision is smal p p the 1TE Trip Generation Manual., hearings equivalent finds the incremental increase in Trip Generation and warranted b. the roughly ye oui alent incremental extension of Fanno traffic is off -set an �' y 9 Creek Drive to the north towards its ultimate destination. 4. The fourth issue is whether the City can and should require the applicant to west redesign the lots on the w t side of Fanno Creek Drive to provide access to that street from . existing and/or potential future development on Tax Lots 200 and 701. ay The City inning duty under Goal oal 2 to coordinate with ODOT about matters of shared ntvere, `, t or jurisdiction. At this time, Hall Boulevard remains under ODOT jurisdiction. To fulfill me City`s duty to coo dinate with ODOT, a condition is prohibit Y cirect vehicular ace Hall Boulevard unless authorized by ODOT access to Hal or us successor in . Although the applicant has applied to ODOT for a road warranted to in into test Althm approach permit for thy. access Boulevard that now serves the single family i Y ess drive to Hall " o homes on tax lot 200 and 701, ODOT has not granted it yet. Moreover, the memo dated April 26, from Pomeroy clearly states access should not be to Hall Boulevard, issuance of the o rmit is not a foregone conclusion, provided � Pe Officer's tC Order SLR 93 -000 aria' 5 93-0064 (Colo y Park Estates ,5) stsanewaviseleasssagmsezawmagnm .13.211EIMMOI7P17.7 7777777- b. In the absence of an 01)011' road approach permit, the City cannot find that tax lots 200 and 701 have access to a scree'.: The record does not show that owners of tax lots 200 and 701 have a right to use the Hall Boulevard access drive for the existing . showing, the 18.164.030. dwelling. In the absence of such a � ��µw from tom,, lot 200 to Fanno Creek Drive g, subdivision violates sects The violation can be remedied by provding access a as recommended by City staff. Therefore the hearings officer finds that condition of approval 3 should require the applicant to modify the plat accordingly to serve the existing dwellings lanless MOT authorizes use of the existing access drive for those .lwelli.ags, (1) if ODOT or its successor does not issue a road approach peannit or other authority for the existing dwellings to access Hall Boulevard before fno plat is approved, then the applicant should be required to improve a private street Creek Drive to serve those Cwellings. (2) If ODOT or its successor issues a road approach permit or other • dwellings a Boulevard before the final plat is authority for the existing dw� >Il$rtgs to access Hall approved, then improvement of the access to Fanno Creek Drive can be deferred. c Ewen if ODOT grants a road approach permit, the City has an obligation . to implement its Comprehensive Plan. The Citybhas determined that allowing access to tax lots 200 and 701 would conflict with the public interest articulated in policy 8.1.1 and section 18,108.060(B). The applicant disputes this conclusion, arguing'the signalized • e adequate y p city. the i not whether intersection ensures 1d�� uate traffic safety and capacity. However, a issue is nook ' g safe; the . ` 0(B) is allowing access to Fall Boulevard would be safe, a issaae under section X8108 (lo y arterial whether access to Hall ;Boulevard is necessary. m it. If access can be provided ro�ide to .anon street, then section 18.108.060(B requires d. The City has agreed to allow access to the existing 'dwellit'ags from the . Boulevard reasoning impact of traffic existing Hall �oule� and access drive � ODOT allows it, reasc�nin the irn act p from two existing homes does not warrant re- routing access now. However, future development will generate more traffic The more traffic, the greater the ts ssntial for disruptions in traffic flow on Hall Boulevard. The City argues that when tax lot 200 is further developed, p . . _... that parcel and tax it be convenient and timely to shift access from th d it would lot 701 to Fanno Cteek Drive to carry out policy 8.1.1 and section 18.108.060(B). e. The hearings officer agrees with City staff that the only way to ensure that access can be provided to existing and future development require to l applicant 200 and 7 701, consistent with section 18.164.030 and 18.108.06 (), modify the plat as recommended in the Staff Report. The hearings officer also observes City City requires applicant to provide for alternative access for the site now, that, unless the Cativel. foreclose ODOT's ability to deny the road approach permit for the t..ity will effectively h! x either existing or future development. � ; _ s in Mr. l�orat�'s memo of April 26. • " t" in . That would be contrary to section 18.108.060(B) and would conflict with the plain meaning of the wo d, p C CLUSTON Based findings, on the above taiddin gs, and the co nclusions in section VI of the Staff Report, request can comply with the applicable standards of the City of the applicant's re oast does -or c Tigard Community Development Code and should be approved, subject to the conditions of approval in the Staff Report with minor changes to enhance its clarity. SLR 93-0003 arings B 93-0004 00(Colony Park Esrates 6) ORDER The applicant's request, SLR 93 -0003 and SUB 93- (Colony Creek Estates 6) hereby approved, subject to the onditions lea Section, VI of the Staff Report, with 'the following amendment to condition of approval 3: 3. The a pplicant shall modify ��tt in.O l at to provide direct vehicular access from tax lots 200 and 701 to Fanno Creek Drive and shall establish and, grant appropriate easements for that purpose. The access shall be private road within g 3 e t rived by the Planning Division, A note minimum .�!��C�:, � �, easement unless othe.se a��..:, on the face of the plat shall identify the ea ement and its urpose and owner°ship, plat lf' ODOT does not issue a road approach permit or otheDr authority br the existing dwellings to access Hall Boulevard before the final plat is approved, then i with y ands for a private street 'e applicant shall improve the easement caa�sa�tent v��th the gran ODOT issues a road ,. permit other authority for the i b. Hall Boulevard before the fin soa roved, then existing dwellings to access � p approved, improvement of the access to Fanno Creek Drive is deferred until those tax lots are developed with additional dwellings or other primary uses. this 10th Larry Epst';in Al � City of 1,ig,� d Ii. „ 'ngs Officer Page 5 — Hearings Officer's Final Ogler SLR 93 -060.1 and SUB 93 -0604 (Color., Pant Estar'es 11) 1 BEFORg TH1 LAID ►.PSE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, ')RE OIL Regarding ■ 1 LIpplication by Torn tiller on behalf STAFF REPORT of k dward and Lois Finnl Oy for Subdivision preliminary SUB 93 -0004 plat approval. Lando SLR 93 -0003 Also requested is Sensitive La Review approval to allow a wetland mods iccition w i . SUMMARY OF TBE REQUEST Subdivision SUB 93.0004 to The applicant requests Subdivision preliminary plat app rovi:l divide approximately 1.69 acres of a 2.53 acre site into 8 = ingle- family lots ranging between 6,000 and 5,300 sQa3are feet it size and one 118 850 square food; duplex lot. Tho existing residence the will be separated from this development-. with the recording of subdivision plat. Sensitive Lands Review approval is also requested to allow a ground disturbance of approximately 30 t cubic yards in the watlan 1 for the purpose of enclosing a o+a3 drain. APPLICANT: Tom Miller 12454 SP Edgewater Court Tiq rd, OR 97223 OWNER: Edward and Lois Finle ► 14010 SW Hall Eoul wail Tic`ard, OR 97223 ACENTs MtMonagle riarris~s /McMonagle Associates, Inc. 12555 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR S7223 COMPREHENSIVE FLAN DESIGNATION: Medium-Density, Residential ZONING DESIGNATION R -7 (Residential, 7 units per bore) ::... LOCATION: 14010 SW Hall Boulevard (WCTM 251 128B, tai lot 200) ity Development lode Chapte , '52, , 18. lie, 18.92, APPLICABLE LAW Ccr,�'�c'� and 1S1.Q�4 ° and. Cc�n rehe�fhsi.ve Plan ice 16Q as r p d` 1D Sib liciea� 2.3.1, 18. 102, 18,108, 3;8,150, 18. d 3.1,.1, 4.241, 1.1.2, 7.3.1, 144.4y 8o1 .1, acrid' Approval 3 "°' tiofs b STAFF' RiEC.fbPdME�iIy�4,TIC�PJ. royal ®iab ei,� to condo: HEARINGS OFFICER - FINZ,E7i' /MILLER II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Teeple egged Informal Bona The City has reviewed no previous land use applications for thinsite. The existing Dingle family residence was built many yeas agct and did not require a p Lanni.,ng review. The existing residence ence will be separated from this development: with the recording of the subdivision plat B. Vicinit Inform :tion and Suerounding_Xand Ueeet This 2.53 acre site i® 1o; atad on the east side of. SW Hall Boulevard opposite the intersection of SW Hall boulevard and SW McDonald Street. The tax lots to the north are largely underdeveloped and are improved' with case single - family residence each. The properties to the south are fully developed with single - family .and attached single-family residences and are tefecred to as the Colon y Crecy ,Estates subdivision. Thes e properties are zoned 'R -7 (PD) . Lend to the ea vt, is also pond R -7 and is largely greenway aserei e.terd wig ;h. Fenno Ci ee'k. Northeast pit tie site is land designated are I -L (Light Indus trial) . A portion of this land is currently under development as an industtia1 park subdivision. The properties across SW Hall Boulevard ate zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 unite per acre) and are oubstant,.ally developed with sin' le family reaicl nces. A single family reai 1ene a on a 0.76 acre parcel separates the subject site from SW Hall Boulevard. Site Descriptions An existing single family residence is located on the western portion of the site Access for this residence is currently gained from SW Hall Boulevard. The Hies. . t,4eneralle slopes toward the eaate, There i e a wetland that has ''seen identified and reviewed by scientific Resources `;roc. (SRI) as being a minimal wetland. This wetland area i.- located on the southern portion of the site. Trees are located throughout the site with a substantial cluster on the ea Stern portion of the property near the noundary of the 100 Isar flood plain. The trees largely consist of Fir, Cedar, Ash, Zlder, and oak. The northeastern portion of the site i3 within the 100 -year flood plain, II. APPLXCABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Community Development Code. 1. enapter 16.52.050 contains standards for the i# -7 zone. A single» family detached ee +idential unit 10 a permitted use in this zone; Detached single-family residential lore in this zoi a motet comply with the following dimensional ee, uirements Minimum lot size Front setback Garage setback Interior sideyard setback Corner sl.deyar-d setbacl: HEARINGS OFFICER - PINLEV. /MXLLER SUB 93 O0b PACE 2 f 0 1aear setback A axima Abu .1dinn height, 15 Xeet. 35 1eeet • Chapter 18.. a 8..._4 .. m C15 states that £andfora alterations within h in ect and areas must meet the jurisdictional �ent � and permit criteria of the Dksision of State L ndd (DMA) US Army Corp s of Engineers, Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) a nd%`Or other fodoral, state or regional pagencies3. Therefore, a City of Ttgare, Sensitive Lands Permit for this pnsrgai ee is not,: reqUired, Etowever, all other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, ieelts'liyag oenaiLive lands permits for areas meeting fanrswetland Bens itt ve land criteria Since the draaia agew y on "he southern porti on of the site is in a watlan& and the wetland , to be modified for the purposes of development:, a sensitive lands permit shall km required as pas ( ctions 1. , 1d g3 .. These sections state that such a permit shall be obtained be o construction or development begins. The approval criteria for modifications to drainageways are listed in Section 281,1_,111,.,04...M.91. These ap lic,sable criteria are: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form aItr ration or development will not create site disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the uaeo 2, The proposed land form alteration or' development will no result in erosion, Stream edime station, grouAd instability, or other adverse on-site and effedts or h zards to life or proper°ty8 3. The water flow capacity of the drainagaway is not decreased, 4 where natural,. vegetation has been removes due to land form alteration or development, the area 'Alt covered by structure s or impervious surfaces j Wreplanted prevent erosion in accord anel with Chapter 18.100, Landacapirq and Scres nitg; S. The dratnageway will be g.`oplaced by a public facility of adequate size to ccordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan; and . necessary U.S. Army corps f Engineers and State half Oregon Land Board, Division of _state Lands approvals shall be obtained. �p criteria o m ia ons to wetlands section 1sg1. n4� ,�a based upon the findings that all Of the following criteria have been Satisfied: proposed ► ' an area designated as i�l.u..aa�.�EsV �ht wetland on wetland �.�a, nor de�esl , srit is neither a�i 1: ® The �aandform alteration Comprehensive Plan Flood la.i x p . the ��srra�� P in and T� ;�tl.and �#� nor is within 25 feet of such a wetland; i3EP k s OFFICER - Sus 93 -004 PAGE CL CO �rmrnen�l' 2. The extent and nature of the proposed landform alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an erter t greater than the minimum required for the use; 3. Any encroachment or, charge in on-site or off-site drainage which would adversely impact twstiend characteristics have been mitigated; Where natural vegetation has been removed due to landform alteration or development, erosion co tz01 provisions of the surface Water ; wnnagement program of Washington County must be met and areas not a vered by structures or impervious replanted like or similar species 6in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening; S. All other sensitive lands requirements of this chapter have been Met Vii. The provisions of Chapter 18.150, Tree Removal, shall be met; 7. Physical Limitations and Natural Hazards, Plood- y.ains and Wetlands, Natural Areas, and Parks, Reecreeare .on and Open Space pn.icies of the Comprehensive Plan have been satisfied. 3. Chapter 18.88.040t C „(;2J.. contains solar access standards for new residential develoPmtatt. A lot meets the basic eelar access lot Standard if it has a north -south dimens:Lon og 90 feet or more and has a front lot line that is oriented within 3t degrees of a true east. w'ast axis. A subdivision complies with the basic requirement if 80% or more of the newly created lots meet or exceed this standard. 4. Chapter 18.92.020 contains standards for density. The number of dwelling units permitted is based on the net development area, excluding sensitive land areas and land dedicated for public roads or parks, or for private roadways. This land area is then divided by the minimum parcel size permitted by the zoning district to determine the number of lots with may be ere : ted on a site. 5. Chapter 18.102.030 specifies vision clearance triangles adjacent to intersections in which the haiget of plantings, signs, etc. are limited to three feet in height to assure safe and adequate sight distance at intersections to reduce potential hazards from vehicular turning movements. Alternatively, trees ma. M ae li�ebees up to eight feet in height. 6. Chapter 18.188.070 contains standards for eingisa- family residential vehicular access. Private drives may provide access for a ma imumm of six residences. A common private acceasway Which serves between three to six residences must be a mininum of 30 feet wide with a mtia.s.rum pavement width of at leant 24 feet, cufb8 and a walkway. HEARINGS OFFICER FINLEY/HILLER SUB 93 -0004 PAGE 4 4. 1 • halite` 1B.15Q.� �B i requires a permit for remo /a1 of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter nt+ttasured scour feet above the ground on undeveloped residential land. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria as specified in Chapter i8 15®. a3®s 41: a. The trees are diseaseed, present ad.°;^:..: t, ppropeerty, or interfere with utility service or traffic eafety; b. The trees have to be reMoved to construct proposed improvements* or to otherwise utilize the applicant' a Property in a reasonable is anan =r; c. 'he trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; The trees are not needed to protect nearby trew,4 as windbreaks or as a ea3esrlraks'le balance betweein shads a d open apace The aesthetic character in the ".1t1 not be visually e area adversely affected by the tree remotTal _, and f. New vegetations planted by they applicant, if any, will replace the aesthetic value of reesE9 to be cut. 8.- Chapter ?!4.164.110 (Bikeways) contains standards for bikeways. a, DevelcPments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the adopted pedestrian /bikeway plan shall include provisions such bikeways g the for the future extension of ch b�.Jsse�aba a throe h t dedication of lasementa or rights -of -gray. b. Development permits issued for planned uAtt developments, conditional use permits, and other develeyp "'X1ents8 which will principally bb en @fit from Owah bikeway shall be conditioned the cost of bikeway irov`.�te�r'.urs. to include • c. Minimum width for bikeways is six feet per travel lane 9. Chapter .160. (JJ. contains standards for the aubdividirl J of b60 aA cor��.a3.ane i�tara Parcels into 4 or more lots. To be approved,, a preliminary plat must comply with the following criteria: Cog a. The proposal City s Comprehensive hensive Plan, the ; an gardiaaace and other applicable ordinance° and regulations; b i- � not not bps du l +icative b. The - pa,A�inosased pia, name �► � arns�. must ' P oth,,rwiae satisfy the Provisions of ORS chapter 92r, c. The streets and roads ; must be laid out So at:, c46 conform to the slat p. Partitions Plats of atiibciivisstn;o>t'ne wand, ma Ps of it3.onrs� or as to subdivisions already approved far. a��dicai.rtisng Property wadth; gener al direction and in all a- thes respects unless EARIN0S OFFICER a Ff Y sU3 93-0004 PAGE 5 the City determine determinee it is in the eab7Gic interest to modify the street or road pattern; :yid d. An explanation has been provided for all co son i.mpao aments. 10. Chapter 18.1.64.0,50 /Li$ l Cbl, etatee that the depth of all lots shall not ` exceed 2-1/2 t .mee the average ict width. 11, Chapte e 1S/ also contains eta* rdE3 for eta; to and utilities. The applicable standards are am fellows: Section 16 154.030 j j require ,. streets within and aeeloining a development to be dedicated tiara ` improved based on the classification of the street. • section 216.24H61gLWALL1liAl requires local streets to be c nsetuc -ted with :14 feet of pavement within a v0 foot rig it-of. wey. c. Section 15 4:, A prohibits lot depth from being more than 2i times the lot width, and requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on either public o;r private streets, other than an alley. • Section 18.164.070 requires sidewalks adjoining all residential stree e e. Section 18 lq,4.090 requires sanitary sewer service. • Section 18.164.100 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements for storm drainage facilities. " - p APPlioable orehsesa ®ive Plan k21ic;kts, t �t q • Policy 2.1.1 provides 'The Cat, will assure that citizens will be provided an opportun? tv to participate it all phases o, the planning and develop review ;Process, 2. Policy 3.1.1 provides that all development in areas identif itr4d ab containing wetlands and sieves in excess of 23% grede be designed oe to comply With approved engineering techniques to make the area suitable for the proposed development. 3 Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard turban regional water alit standards. area shall comply with applicable fedeea,l0 state and regional equality ancdards. 4,. Police y 71.2 provides the City will require as a Gendieiot of development approval that public eater, sewer, and stoi drait, age Will be provided and designed to City standards and stilit r placed rundergrc und. BARING s OFFICER - PINLA ' /MILLER OS 93 --0008 PAGE 6 • Pe y 7.3.1 provides the City will coordinate water services with water districts. requires all new develo e an 6 d Policy � m 4 . � r�egrx psn . I�Yt ' to be connected. to a approved sanitary sewer system. ▪ Policy 7.6.1 recce tree: that, the development, be served by a water system having adequate wai er preesui a Li'� fire protection purposes and that the Fire District review all such applications. S. Policy 8.1. 1 provides the City will, plan for a wire and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs ae d anticipated future growth and development. 9. Policy 8.1.3 provides the City will require as a precondition of approval that • Development abut a dedicated stt set or have other adeauate access b. Street right -of -way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width 0. The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs, sidewalk® to city standards aithin the development. • The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the develop-ent' a imp ,cta p • Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. IV NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Operations Department has reviewed this applicatto; a and has stated t et the available maps do not show the wasting sanitary sewer line being located as indicated as on the preliminary plat. 2. General Telephone has requested that the developerjl )ui1der contact the. GTE Engineer at least 30 days prior to trench opening. 3. "igar-d-Tualatie School District 23.7 has reviewed t is application and has noted thee the proposed development is projected to generate 3 now students for Phil Lewis Elementary School, 1 new atudent at Fowler N:,iddle School, and 1 new student at, Tigard High School. The School £'istrict noted that the school capacity at the sigh S�rhool is already .. g thou h both Phil Lewis E exceeded, a both lesnentax'Y and Fowler Middle School are ,. entl h of the Hight'School �ida e;itficient ®to be able that consider portable additions. Additionot scs eel capacity may be prcvid ed by other options under consideration by the Scho�;tl biatricty l�ac3 *acting: grade level reconfiguration, rescheduled school year, bouundary adjus ments, double HEARINGS OFFICER - FINLEY,%MILLEH i IMF shifting, busing to under- utilized facilities, future bond measures leading to construction of new facilities and other school housing rapt s.v;ne ,, Nei9 hb)rhood Planning Organization (ail►® #5 has r eviewed this proposal and has offered the following comment e: NPO #5 cannot support this project as Presented due to the obVious, severe, and negative impacts the rezultinq motor vehicle r the existing Colony Creek neighborhood to traffic w�.13 have upon.. th existing 1 the south. It will be in the best interest of all parties to do an street improvements first, l as a contingency to any further development. This should also include a northern access that does not ia..A mot Hall Boulevard. NPO #5 has else stated the foll.owoing on an additional dent sheets We see problem project long the following are see no roblea� 'wit development. h this ro+ eot are lore_ as done in conjunction with this 1) Na access to Hall Boulevard; Ee�c Court access to SW Hal;. 2) The existing Colony C ` Boulevard shou .vacated; . . 3) Downstream Property owners ah e lc be n a tif ied about oa t this projects' impact on the Fenno Creek banklch annel . Tualatin Valley Fire District #1 has reviewed this propoea`L and has ccmMented that no less than 20 feet of unobstructed driving surface should be prcr, h parked " .. si is this vided as all times o Wher® cars w+�,ll. restrict width, "No Parking' signs shall be install d. No Parking" g shall else be installed in the turnaround area of the private drive. 5. On Zda }oh 30th, the Planning Division received a letter from F.J. and Lois Finley (owners of the site) which presents two specific regueste g proposal. . The Finley° requuesthtto Fretain regarding the impacts of t�a3, fa rox�osa,l .. ,1 h oulev ard., The y the use of their e�ietin� driveway onto SW Ball B e 15o state that they do no,. want anything ti`o preclude the future development of the Q.84 acre site which they are retaining. The City of Tigard Building p ►rtiand General Electric, Metro Area CamMxn cation s , an. d ligard T:ter District have reviewed this p roposal and have offered no comments o r cab jectiona V. EVALUATION Oat REQU'ST, Anal sit,: . - Subdivision. ubdivision complies d � tend . of the .,.. d ardor 1. The pacopc�a�d 1 � • i e a . n (section 18.52 q O beraause the lots are -. the i�a�� r H 7 zona.x�:atricr Ssc:tion n . _ o developed as single• - family deta rhea and auplex intended to be Bevel , ,� � p ^welling units; both permitc.ted use ' n .85 The 9 proposed posed a in size between 50000 ae zone. � opeet, � eh ranging HEARINOS OFFICER FINLEY /MILLER SUB 93 PA#E 8 • • • Ets +R, are all equal to or larger than the minimum requirements off thin zone 15,000 square feet for single family uae, 10,000 atrare feet for duple, use) . ' The existing residence greatly e: ceeda all setback requirements All proposed lots are aubjeet to the setback standards of the R-7 $ones : Compliance with : these standards will bee reviewed as part of the building permit application process for residential structures. The prel ainary plat also i.nc&i.cattes an open space area on the northeastern corner of the 'eitea. The gaejority or this open area of within the 100 - year foloodpiais of Fannie Creek. Five of the lots (lots munbisr 123 - 127) meet the basic solar r access requirements as specified in Code Section 18.88.040/91.01. The front Teat line orientation of these lots is wit hin 30 degrees of true east-west. These lots also provides a minimum north - •south dimension of at least 90 feet. Lot 122 exceeds thg dimensional qu however the front lot line in oriented north --ao nth requirement, irelmaent, along the terminus of the private drive. The balance of these lots (lots 128 _ 130) do not meet either of these two reztiremoente Of the 9 proposed lots, tteo may be counted as the standard 20% exemption from these solar lot requirements. These two exempted lots shall be lots 1211 and 128. The two remaining lots ( lots 129 and 130) are accepted by staff as exceptions to these standards as per Section 18. ee a 040 ) f. 11 i a i, . The future location of the extension of SW Fenno Creek .Drive to the north of the site, plus the configuration of this site, prohibits the applicant's ability to propose an alternative street design. In order to utilize the buildable portions of this site, and to continue the desired road pattern in this area, the applicant is s ilar,ly limited in the ability to create fully solar lots without reducing the total n� :ober of potential lots. Therefore, is it recommended that these remaining two lots be exempted from he solar access requirements nts according to the above referenced adluatment to the design standards, 3. The proposed subdivision cOMplied with the density standards of Chapter 18.92.020 penalty). The net deVelepa :te area of the site after deduction of the public right --of -way, the aereage rea3:nag with the existing reeidence0 and the undevelopable portions tot'. this bite) is approximately 0650 square feet x;.21 acres) $, the groan Site ;s ap rokimate y 2.53 acres: With minimum lot ei 30 of 50000 squat feet per dwelling unit and 10 o 000 equate feet, for duplex units, this site yields an cpportunitY for 10 dwelling . ' .. the �t -i zoning designation a Thi±»' applicant has unite udder proposed the creation of 9 lots containing residences and hereby has maximized the allowable de- 5ity and ,therefore co applies with this Eta 4dad. ( ..) . all - + s 'that suer � ate vi ®ion 4. Chapter 118.1 ®2 'Vi69tla�. �l+earance required be provided at all road intersections. 'phi# a 'standard shall krze - the requirements a*egarding the height Satisfied 3 cad b adherexacs to and an lacement o_. ... p � any future possible ®bstrUdtisins 4lncl%i di,n g Subdivision 'deg .tficatioa sign Prier to the In tiillstaon ot a ny a HEARit`Gs oFF108 t FlN y /MIT.rAA ,SUIT F E 9 • such sign; a sign permit from Planning Department met be obtained. The sign pf xmt i revie and approval procee® tarill require a finding that the sign ayrfll. be c ®n:3atent with the requirements of Chapters 18.102 (Vision Clearance) and 18.114 (Sigrid). Section 18.108 (Access) and Section 1, .164.06® M (Lot Frontage) are partially sati3f ied. Ail2.:, pew lots are provided with at least 25 feet of public or private roadway frontage. The lot which will retain the eitioting residence is prohibited access to SW Fenno Creek Drive by the design of thin preliminary plat. • Ad addressed under the staff analysis of Section 18.164 below, it shall be recommended that the Hall Boulevard access*, , tc this residence be closed and that access be provided from the extension of SW Fenno Creek Drive. This lot is intended to be approxisc ate y 0. i6 sores in ci..ze and therefore, will retain the ability to be developed with 5 additional residential ' nnita (6 total) ender the current zoning ceei 'atioa, The minimum accailis width fo r a private ritreet nerving Rix residences is 30 feet. The city is not in a 'potation to recommend approval in a future Pp�oval of a ,eit�aatioitn '4d��'5,�� , a X11. rer�u].t need for a variance; in this case, an ac mass' variance. Given the potential elopabL1ity of this lot and the City's, recommendation c)err that access apparel* th be provided from the exten®ien of SW Fanno Creek Drive o it is pp at one of the westernmost °iota, Will be lost in order to provide the ability for adequate futur-'e aeeeee to this lot. The balance of the lots eatl afy then© bode tOcluireiarenta by rovid y 30 meet wide and by P � c3 r frontage for eStc.�k! providing a private roadway' which Le at le6 t ide Which • will provide access to six residences. 6. Section 18.164 ) � the .: t Of0 Al 611 �42Q to oaae.tat�etBt� B, 129 and�3D ar depth to width ratio is 2-1/2 ^ are shown to be 121 feet deep and 41 $ et wile. ` This produces a ratio of 2.95 to one With a 41 foot lot width dimen4ion these three iota exceed the Maximum allowable lot depth b y 18.5 feet each. The applicant i3 not able to reduce 'Vile depth of these three lots without causing these Iota to be bit-oilier than the required 5,000 square foot minimum. In light of the City' a recommendation to elininate one of these lots in order to provide adequate acceaa for future development potential to the existing rea; denc �ep the additional. width not need for the accee®wtag filmy be added to tote 128 and 129. This adjtistment in property limes plus a reduction in lot depth to 117.5 feet would bring these Iota into com2pliance and produce lot, are approximately � square feet in s ` applicant e whic� a r4 � yal " 5, 522 p F i �' ,. 'The nt miicant did not re' eat a. variianc �fe this ��e� The . � _ _ puairpoeieenor recent any information i n eu art on one i xt the application packet which Wad aubaiaitted for review. The applicant to may choose to present a variance regaaes� J tc� enable throe lute to exceed the lot, depth to wife.:(„ standard if they determine that such a request fie heeded. HHEARINGS OFFICER - FINLEY/MILLER SUB cs -0004 PAGE 10 t ea uo • • &. Sect' On i� 5a,9 a $ (free Removal) reguiree that th'. apPlicant p 1y for, and receive approval for, a tree. reniov l' »ermni; p' i, r to the removal of any tree measuring 6 '. inches oii greater removal Ln diameter at a height of four feet 3ba'ro grade prior to al of any Ouch tree from the site. A detailed tree survey has not been submitted as part ef“this aPPlication.% Therefore, prior to the Laauance of , a tree removal pert, the applicant shall auPpay., a map specif; ►ing the tz eer in4' requested for remov,fi as they +• ub :ic i�rcarov�er entee u aPd 2) building e1nve1op►ee . rels��e to: 1) p and size s7�: all trees on This information shall iderntfy the tYPe t'hta, Site whioh ai a ,greater than 'Ui.x inr, hes if d.i net er relative to each tree removal permit applidation. 'consistent with t, ivieion he taubid 3.i►+e proms l standards of Chaster: �...,; ®ree9 subdivision i® cry ,� 1S. �,G6A:M�fi approval a ��►1 (subdivisions) because. a. The proposed oadiviaioa complies with the Comprehensive Plan " !kap' s medium- bensity Ree deatta L deneity oppvrtufity for the Elite ae well ae with the applicable plan P011(2100.1 the r,egulatioue of the A-1 scone, and other applicable regulet ions; The ro need name Of the sUbd vision (Colony Creek Estates b. 'h P'o other r p it.t eOterded, in ��3 3.� not duplicative of any Waehif'ielton County • The ropoSed public and private atr�eete 'prcVide gor eioth adeq. the r .y . ro weed P the afore mentioned with the it) tbae iota a. , a'.. bdLvisi.on, wi P aceeea quee ion relating to the let whieb is retaining the t, .sting reeideno� e„ This reli.. ig ry plat Aldo pria��ia�ves �' _ v abutting the for the extension of a propod ed titre /lCt stub adjacent property to the 0ort1h a p _ n ode Sections • The raposs was an d ®tiibe3i�riei�►n ie� not cone9�steni~ with b� th�er«3, , a,,�t tic 13.164.110 regarding the provtai.on of bik y bikeway indi cated on: the tdtgiigllgary plat coda Ze i 11 110. A1SD aa re � fires that appr ©aal Of aPVelOg4Onts adioinin g � 'the ��st or the kewsya be conditioned to latil tde eith c pt y v p o a � o not o+�netuucti.c >n cf bikeway impr ®r�ea� ®ate b Tb7iic� �"`� � .... feet ns The r,Ode ►, pittci i include either Of thee two cptic► � " �,aa;ng ', treets per travel lane 4IhiCh is applicable to bLiteW�►ys a1 • width of eight feet has been historically re l e ire for, bikeways. along Pan no Creek. TherefOre' thr prOittiiXaU plat aha-ll be .. with a - n, of a. raved b��eway w ✓ g bikeway shall svi®ed to ii�dicat�e t n3:re�xnuna width c� Six feet The salt not �,�f t ,. he pro�v e o ... � _ ®d .. '�.a. ihi.e �rike be itthi.n the � f ..... li be ,. ; . 1�1f! year flo p � .�,�: alt. '�c►rr �,;pond�to �itherip a�c�i,rig P to the north (e ., ) rad,tth d by easement; and ►�n . ,. STS 93 ® ® ®6 ar�si O'C� �+�I,Cq►C3 as bi.k ®�ia'�y eeartiam ®e S °� well. ad preVide th ... y - ,y he c� rtu�ait f�as this bike�t�a... to dontini3e southward trot the bite. HEARINCs oFFIcER - Fxir a /lX R sv13 93 -0004 PACE 11 u,, ay. The City Of Tigard Engineering Department' has reviewed the proposal and offers the following ana lygri n with retgard to streets, sanitary sewers and storm drainage: . gtreeto:, This site co ntainss pis ,,existing ni ng + family' residence which gainss its access, from SW Hall, Boulevard. in addition, the .4,4ite also has acced® frdm SW Fanno Creek Drive though .t is not being used. at this time, paged on the preliminary plat, the applicant ` prepooOs to extend SW' Fenno Creek' Drive tc the north property Yinse to serve a per ,ion of the development, to extend a Private drive from SW Fanno ores& Drive to serve the eastern portion of the Site, and to maintain t:ia existing access on SW Lal'l Boulevard for the' existing horn ohati southwest Fanno ,creek Drive in c.asaif ied as local street And in fully improved to local, sstres jt standards. The applicant proposed to build' the extension of 00 Fanno creek Drive .to local street standards. These standards r e4:.iire a 50 foot right- of-way dediCation with curbs and sidewalk v On both sides. at Should be noted the applicant has incorrectlIr labeled the 'public street on the preliminary plat. The extension ot this street Should be named SW Fanno Creek Drive and not SW Colony Creek p,r &ve. southwest Ball Boulevard is under the jurisdiction of the Aregon Department of Transportation (Opot) Half Street improvemeute and right - f« -way dedication to 45 feet from Centerline are typically required for developments which from SW Hall Boulevard. As of this report, oDOT has not submitted its commen -S to the City Planning Division. Based on past deciOions in the vicinity of this development, the state will be requesting half street improvements and rights -of -way dedication to 45 feet from centerline. Ballad on the applicants' submittal, they axe prepared p. .alf street issaprovements With the requited right.. to rovid= the of -way dedication. .. p y . there is an existing Single family ; "esidnce As revn.ezwte�: r,errted� t!a on this Site which gains its access from Sal Hall Boulevard. it should also be noted that this access is shared with the property to the north (TL 701) • Tax lots 700 and 701 (both under the Same ownership) are noW under review by the City for Subdivision approval (SUB 93..0006). Secti,nn 18 ,p2_050 of the community Development Code sets approval standards for Major Land Partitioning, which refers to Section 3a , i0s.g60 D ' . Section 18.108.060(B) states: Direct individual access to arterial or collector Streets g , j ; ... Shall p. - accei�i� to w�a ors co/lector • . ® Ara diecoura sad. Direct or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no alter,e,ative way to aocosS the site. the subdivision aPPiicatiois ss, there Based on both here are,, several alternatives to having the access for these lots provided from SW HEARINGS OFFICER - FI NtY /MIILEYt SSa 93 -»000 PAGE 12 wWNW "u r • Fenno Creek Drive rather than SW Hall .Boulovard.Therefore, the applicant should be required to provide access to the existing single family residence from SW Fanno ' Creek Drive. This access should be wide enough to accommodate potential future development. As stated above in the review of Section 18t.1 ®S the width of this accessway shall be a minimum of 30 feet. The applicants • engineer provided a Copy of an app .cation form to the Platning Division on April 15, 1993 which was submitted to ODOT for approval to construct a road approach for the driveway access onto SW Hall Boulevard. If this permit is issued by ODOT, it shall be apparent that it is not currently necessary for this d y closed. Therefore, the City may waive this driveway access to be c condition. The City is currently reviewing three Subdivision applications (SUB 93)003, SUS 93-0004, and SUB 93. -0006) and has approved one Site Development Review (Snit 92 -t 020)in this area A11 four applications ar& connected in that they are all adjacent properties. If all of the se applications are approved and built, SW Fanno Creek Drive would be completed and would connect with SW Hall Boulevard, Currently, there i3 an existing temporary access to SW Hall Boulevard from SW Colony Creek Court. The purpose of this temporary access is to provide the existing neighborhood with access to SW Halo. Boulevard uhtil such time as SW Fenno Creek Drive is completed and connecter with SW Hall Bo 1evatd. It should be noted tT a;a when SW Fenno Creek Drive is compli ted and connected with SW Hall Boulevard, the City will close Off the temporary ecuesf to SW Hall Beetle. -: rd that exists at the west terminus of SW Colony Creek Drive. B. Sanitary . S wer There is an existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer line located within SW Fanno Creek Drive. The applicant is proposing to connect to, and extend, the sewer line to serve the western portion of this development. There is also an existing S inch line located in the northeast corner of the development. The applicant is proposing to connect to, and extend, this line to serve the eastern portion of the development. The existing lines have the capacity to a commpdate t his devela pm ent. This connection shall be provided by an easement across the affected portion of lot 122. ThiS easement shall also be extended to connect to the greenway And to provide pedestrian access to the bikeway. This easement shall be paved to a minimum width of 6 feet to provide usable access to th= bikeway. Storm t»raina e: The site slopes generally t4iwavd the northeast. The ap3plicant Pro/loses to drain a portion Of the site to the existing public storm tiewer syfit4Ta. The private ytreet and the lots that , front it will drain into Fenno Greek at the northeast corner of the HEARINGS OFFICES - FIWLE /M7ILLEH SOB 93 -00 04' PAGH 13 A site. Since this it stOrm drain will need to cross a portion of the parcel to the, north, a storm drainage easement' shall be required across the affected portion of tax lot 700. The Unified Sewerage hoency has e stablished and the city has agreed to enforce (Rescaution arx g Order No. 91-47) Siutrface Water' Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or tees in -lieu of their construction. The applicant, has not proposed any one, -eite water quality facility. It is the CLt r' a opinion that, cti.,et to the size .of the development and the extet;'lzag storm water faci'1 #itiea, that the creation of Such a facility 4oerld be inappropriate for this development. A fee in lieu of its construction shout; .d be required. i rnal sip 3enL it ku a Lands Review The proposal to fill a drainageylay near the southern portion of the site in the vicinity of iota 125 aid within the ,regu Lions specified by Section j. ji40 j ae specified below: a • The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site dtsturbance greater than that required is order to reasonably develop this portion of the site. b • The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream-sedimentation, ground result tata.oaa, instability, or other adverse on- -site and off -Cite of feOta or hazards to life or property. As stated in the x,etter received from SRI which was submitted with this applicaa&:,ion, the estimated impact will likely not exceed 30 to 35 cubic yards. As the 50 cubic yard minillIUM will not be exceeded, no state perntit or review through the Oregon Division of State Lands is required. c The water flow capacity is not decreased in that adaqurate store draina g e facilities hall be requited which ich wi.l1 more than replace the drainage capabilities loot by the filling of t1 is minimal c rainageway: d. Moat thR arci a afCec� ed by thin Modification will be . by w by Pe surfaces ccsv'ercd either by a►truaturee off. b 3xn rvi:o�as The balance of this land wi.i.l eventually by landscaped through the installation of residential yards. e '• the drainer ewa w , lced by g Y Will be r a p,, .. by a system of pr3v`ate storm drains which taili connect to a stOrM 'drain td be located Ln the pr ivate dtiAre re 'erred to an Tract A. This storm p s etem will rOvide outflow to Fanno Creek, y f u No permits are necessary from the U.S. Army Corp of Engitaeer , the State of Oregon Land Board or ` the Division, of State Lands. BEARINGS OFFICER FINLEY/HILLER SUE 93-0004 PAGE 14, M1 This minimal landfo m rodifi� tion is not within or adjacent to the 100 -year flood;, plain. T p po tic,�.�n Of • The proposal to fill. a wetland area near the southern x the site in the vic .pity of ]lots 125 and 126 is within the regulations specified by 'section: 1@.44,-0,91.11.), as apecif ieal bel°w: 8 a. The area proposed to be filled is not designated on - the Citye' comprehensive Plan Flooello Iain atd Wetland Nap nor is it within 25 feet of such -a wetland; . The extent and nature of this 1 andform alteration will not create disturbance to an extent greater ` than the minimum required for the requested use; • The proposed change in, the drainageway will n 'preliminary adversely impact any wetland aharact�ar�f tics reliv inary wetl.anad afar ,sment provided by Scientific Resources, sources, Inc. (SRI) States that the width of the wetland averages about 2 feat within the project. The wetland is found . immediately at the base of the swalo and does not extend upslope. more than 6 inches. The functional value of the wetland is stated' as being very' low; • ErosiOn control provisions et ' the Surface Water Management program will be met Stor►f drains will be provided which • will connect to a catch basin located north of lot 124. This water will then be discharged' into Fann r Creek; e. All other applicable sensitive lands requirements of this chapter have been met; e Free removal permits shall be requited for all sits work. g All applicable Comprehensive been ve plan Policies have satisfied as addressed in this recommendation. C Compliance Withrehenaive Plan Polk es 1. the subdivision is consistent with Policy 2.1.1 because notice of the application and the public hearing on this item wan provided to the neighborhood planning orgaanimation (NPO #5) and to owners of property within the notification area Of the Elite. An ad has placplaced in ,, g which hail advvertifed the tiaae and e o pUblld hearing to �be held on this application: 2. to order r to comply with Policy 4.2.1, a condition is Warr anted to require the developer to prepare an erosion control plan enanting compliance with aviceion control standards fair the Tualatin River I Baei.n ass part of the grading perrriit applicat .s n. It is redOMMended that the developer shall pay a ee in -$i.eu 02 the conetruct ion 02 an 014 -rite water quality frecility. HEARINGS OFFICER SUB 93 -0004 PAME 1�+ • 4 y This proposal p r 7.1.2, . 1, and subdivision com lies with Policies 7 � 3 7.4 .4 because the applicant will extend pubic sewer and water systems to this site and will provide for underground installation of phone, electricity, and cable television lines. 4. The subdivision proposal complies with Policy 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposed extension and improversents to the street within and adjacent to the subdivision will contribute to a safe and efficient street system in this area. The creation of an extension of SW Fanno Creek Drive, and the creation of the two private drives, required ler�cal sand .r3.:,�ai,:e ®tr with improved consistent the City of Tigard standard for public private streets, respectively. VI., CONCLUSION MID RECOM!4ENDATlOB1 The Planning Division concludes that the proposed subdivision, will promote the general welfare of the city and will not be significantly detrirencal nor injurious to sur.rounding properties provided that developsi st which occurs after this decision pL� complies with applicable local, Estate and federal laws. P In recognition of the f flings staff recommends APPROVAL of Subdivision proposal SUB 93 -0003 for the ps sed Bridgopark subdivision subject to the conditions which follow. ALL CONDITIONS SHALL HE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THE STAFF CONTACT FOR ALL RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS IS CHRIS DAVIES, IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 639 -417/. 1. The applicant shall submit a revised preliminary plat which demonstrat &ts the provision of a minimum of an eight foot wide bikeway within the 100 year flood plain of Fanny Creek. Alternatively, this bikeway may be provided rovided b easement. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy, Planning Division„ The applicant shall provide an easement across lot 122 to provide for the connection of the sanitary sewer to the existing line. This easement shall. be esttended to provide pedestrian access to the greenway and bikeway. This easement shall be paved to a Minimum width of eight feet to provide usable access to the bikeway. 3, Direct access onto SW Hall Boulevard shall not be permitted. A neg,r access shall be provided from the existing house to SW Fenno Creek Drive. This acces ©way shall be at least 30 feet wide in order to provide for future developability of the remaining land. This condition may be waived if ODOT approves an application to 'onstrttot an Approach Road for the driveway which intersects SW Hall Boulevard and serves the existing residence` 4. Full width street iBprovementB, including traffic control devices, ,... X main box cluste, r. s, concrete Es . id.. ewalkc, drives' � ap:Sond a cur b , isephaltic concrete pairement, sanity sewers, storm drainage, str eet iig htsr and underground Utilities shall be installed g within the subdivision. HEARINGS OFFICER - FINAEY/MittER SUB 93 -0004 PA WE 16 S' - oa Improvements shall be designed and constructed to local Street standards 5. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Stat e of Oace a:,n g Highway DL risionr to perform rm work within the right -Of -Way of SW Hall Foulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Deparment prior to ieseJuance of a Public improvement Permait. 6. Additional right -of --way Shall be conveyed to 1:he State 'of Oregon, by and thrnn gh the Dm ,,.x '-,aunt of Transportation, Highway Division, along the sites ° SW Hall aonlcvard frontage to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet' from centerline. Tho description shall be tied to the existing right -of --way centerline. Verification that the conveyance 'hattid bean cub fitted to the State, shall be provided to the City Bn i neerinq Department. (For additional it formation, contact Myron Melick; Oregon Department of Transportation, Right -of -Way Section, 7165 SW 'ix: Loop, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 684, -15108 7 Standard half- street improvements, includLng concrete ,hide oalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, saptitary sewer, Storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along the SW Hall Boulevard frontage. amprov7ants shall be designed and constructed to Oregon Department of Transportation street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved by the Engineering Department. B. Typically, the City will also require that all vtilitit a shall be placed underground along the sites' SW Hall Boulevard frontage, Howel or, if this is found to be impractical in the judgement of the Engineering Department in the review of the p detailed improvement plene, the applicant may instead pay a fee in -lieu of undergrOunding utilities along this frontage. 9 TWO (2 sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of appro edd by Professional itemized construction cost estimate, pr ® p y a Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building DiVLsioxa and Should only include sheets relevant to public impeovemients. 10. An erosion control: plan shall be provided as part Of the puiblid improvement drawings. The plan shall conform tic "Erosion Control Plans Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989.6 11 a The applicant shall pay the feee established under the guidelines of unified sewerage Agency Resolution and Order NO. 91 -97 NC T 'hat,G iS a two part fee which is paid at two separate ti a a. The first part it paid with any atesociated public improvements for that portion of t a i development WhiCh'increases the impervious area Within the public right- of -way. The second part Is paid At the time of Building Permit issuance or each individual lot. HEARINGS OFFICER - FlNLEY /M L R sug 93 --0004 PAGE 1/ y'p The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be dirjohargc4 into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting propertiee downatream. Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement Plane. Caloulstions and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin service area shall be provided as a supplement to the Pulblic improvement plans. Calculations shall ba based 0A full development of the serviceable area. The locatiori a.;.id capacity of existing, Pro)PoEsed, and future lines shall be addre00ed. A storo drainage easement shall be provided acroAs tax lot 700 to the north, thereby providing adequate outflow for th0 storm sewer located in the private drive shown on the preliminary plat es Tract A. ,A grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and Proposed .contours and typical finished floor elevations on each lot, including elevations at 4 different corners of the floor plan tied to' the top of curb elevations as show on the public improvement plans. The exi ezingetesidence shall be connected to the public sanitary sewer system. The applicant, shall Make an appointment for a preconstruction meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of the publie improVement plans and prior to beginning work on the site. The applicant, the applicant's engineer and Contraotcr shall be required to attend this Meeting prior to receiving the approved plans and permits. 18. Construction of the proposed public improVemente shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans, a Street opening permit or construction compliance agreements has been executed, execution of a deVelopere engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees. Ptior to recording the plat with Washington County, . the applicant shall provide either a 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment. AS an alternative, the applicant may record the plat after the public improvementg have been accepted by the city of Tigard and the appropriate Maintenance Bond has been posted. 20. Prior to the recording of the Plat with Washington County, the City of Tigard will ensure that the "street Plug" is dedicated to the public. The "street plug" is shown as Tract "C" On the Colony Creek Estates Plat which was recorded on Page 19 Book 47 Record of Town Plats of Washington Count. 21. A tree survey identifying the type and Size t2 al e trees On the site Which are over 6 inChed in diameter shall be eebmitted. Thin ntgrveY' Shall also specify those trees which are proposed for removal ' in connection With the c ,nstruottfati oi p3veraeftte. It tree removal permit Shall be applied for and approved by the Planning Division Pilot to the removal of any such ttede 6ThloP CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning biviaiori. HEARINGS OF'gICER - FINLEY/HILLER Stg 03-0004 TM APPLICANT WOULD BE IftBQUIRBD TG G©?+ PLY `WITH • T1 B POL?C. LAWN c NDITIONs Paz ®R, TO T ISBBAN 1 ` OF ,BUILDING PERM ITS: 22. A tree Burv�ey identifying' the .,type ,.and, 'die o± aid. trees on he GO. what �• over : • I6 ihcs"� s in diameter eha11 bO aubmLtted. Thin Rury y' E a 1 dpecLfy, ti iO�3e tb"+~ !e whin -are prt.pOaed gor, re v8, . in cc�nnectLori + th the ntVnet . p 1 ®u if a edi eueeie. , , tx^ee 4.07; { 1 , rmtt• »� iha1l bo espp1iefl gt =.nd apprm*GO by th F am t ng Divief.OI Oeiar to 'the rerkr*4). ,. of any mach ,treed ®n date ` S�a�'APP G biTA ' a Ittctar. Adon'..i, Planninng . . Divi®1om. aDSDIvT55t� P �. RD �r fti T 'HI; t� '. P LAT t1 3D TTED WX XR A ON ti txmapt.tu MONTHS gP iIV DATg oi' ,E3 Is � RcxCg Px�, y 'tom .Yoy e a,'ce� H s stun AS iatant Planner • ir Approved Bye: D $.ck • Bewer' Or f Senior Planner stJI 9 -G004 r, LEGIBIIIM STRIP 1 sJ. 691h: AVE m HALL a3r7137c-b'T. A-V AVE. 0 co m • tn 1.11 - 17'1 RS 'V.:- LAGE 3A1a0 r: u., coNDomiNiums ›rn DENNIS & CO SHAM 5325 ,$W COLONY:, m TIC ' 01U 97224 MILLER, L IL 12454 al EDGEWATM TXOARD t R 97223 r } B PARD ?INLEY I 14010 SW ,L BLVD I TI yAR1 OR 97223 II !, CRAIG HOPKINS 7430 SW YARNS ST TIGPaD OR 97223 BILL maliONAGLS 12556 SW HALL BLVD TIG1d' OR 97223. SVEN VON HEIDEKEN 13390 SW HALL BLS TIGARD 97223 JOHN & KIM BARTHOLOMEW 14145 V PALM CREEK CT TIC Y: D OR 97224 ewe L018 1?xNL81 uti 14010 BW HALL Bit) TIGARi' Oit 97223 ,t4R8., WINKLE 8395 SW C'CtONY CREED CT T7.7ARD OR 97224 B2FORE TH LARD USE ..RINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Tom Hiller on behalf of Edward and Lois Fi.n.‘cy for Subdivision ?reliminar plat approval. Also recj eeted is Sen 3itive Lands Review approval to alloar, a wetland modification. I. SUHHAPY OF THE REQUEST Subdivision SUB 93 -0004 SUMMARY: The appli.Oar t requests Subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide approximately 1.69 a .area of a 2.53 acre site into 8 single - faMily Iota ranging betvaen 5,000 and 5,300 ssluar e feet in size csnd one 11,850 square foot duplex lot. The ex&eiting residence Will be separates f tom this development with the recording of the subdivision p3 s,At. Sert,aitive Lands Review approval is also requested to ILL,, ,01/ ground disturbAnce of aipproxi-mtate].y 30 to 35 v ._, o g cubic v..xds in the wetland f��r the P�1 ae of enclosing a Storm ou d caiu APPLICANT: Tom allidx' 12454 SW Edgewater Court Ti,yard, OR 97223 OWNER: Edward and Lois 8ou1r�vay 14010 SW Ha rd Tigard, OR V7223 AGENT Bill M�Mona le arri ®McHo a ad e Asaooiaatea Inc. 12555 SW Hall: Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREFENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium be,,ait , Residential ZOD1fIt+1O DESIGNATION: Retideuti ; 7 units r , .. - R-7 � i acre) at LOCATION e 14610 SW Hall ?Boul,� lard (Wt TM 281 1204, tart idt 200) APPJ'AICABLE LAW Community Deve nt Code Chap... _ S2, 18.84; 18.88, 113 4 92, .... , .. � to r e Code � tere~S 18. 1801 020 ..8, ®8� 1... � , • and Comgreheanai ie k'1a Policies 2.1.:, 2 7.3:10 1.4.4 X3.1.1 a a 1.50 18:166 and 18.164 . , and 8.1.3. 3.1.1, 4.2. , v WAFT R. U CCWAENDATONI, Approval vb. Ject', te 00ndit3zac�n SUB 93 -00 ©4 PAGE 1 PLI1 .a c. 11. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SUltROUNDINGs Sgckagound information: The City has reviewed no previous land use applications for this site. The existing sin tale family residence was built many years ago and iid not regv!ire a planning review° The existing residence will. be separated from third development with the recording of the aubd .vision piat s 1. .s nit Informer and. Sur rou,,. Le t.1 : Thar 2.53 acre site is located on the east side Of SW Bali. Boulevard -,k L;iite the intereectiOn of SW Hall boulevard and SW McDonald Street + g The tax logo ` to the north largely usadesdeVeioped and are improved with one Single-family resident.a each. The properties to the south are full* developed with 'single- family and attached single - family residences and are referred to ae the Colony Creek Esta'�¢ <s subdiviaion. These propto:ties are monad R -7 (PD) . Land to the east, is al So zoned R-7 and is largely greenway associated with Fenno Creek. Northeaet of the site is land de signated as I -L `Light Industrial) A Vortion of this land iv currently under development as an industrial park subdivision. The properties► across SW Hal]. BouXevard are zoned R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre) and are a abstantl ally developed with single ,family. residences.; A single family residence on a 0.76 acre parcel eeparatae the subject site from SW Hall. Boulevard. site DeetCtion An existing single family ti residence �® located o � the vd�nter n portion rtion of the site. Access for this residence is urgently galalad 2=0511 SW Tall Boulev .rd. The site generally slopes toward the e&!st. There is a by Resources Inc. s being a �a °�in=mal wet ,s ART a has been identified and reviewed This wetland iar�t+:;�.ao located on wetland that Portion g the southern onion ©*� the ayte+ Trees ar.� located t�xr�,u hour, the site with a substantial cluster on the eastern portion of the pry, party near the boundary of tho 1 00 year flood p lain. The eee portion lglyy conetet of Fir, Cedar, Ash, Alder, and Oak. The northeastern enf the site is within the 100 -year flood plain. III. APPLICABLE 'IPPRCVAL STANDARDS COmMM A ttY .Develo,? ant Cody b 1. Chapter 1 8. a2 u , .060 .. containa Stand rd® ¢fir the R Zone. A e i ngle- f�il y deter. ed re6idential dhit is a ' rmi��g� � ®en A xOne. Detached s :.ngle- family teg :dential Zoos i>ra this zone must Comply with the following dimen3i onal requirQ nenta i minimum lot size Front setback Garage setba k Interior s .d'aYsle d setback Corner sideyard setbaac 5, 000 square feet 15 feet 20 feet 5 feet 10 feet HEARING=S OFFICER FIkLEY/ TIER SIUB 93 -00e4 PAGr C9 Rear :setback Maximum building height 15 feed`. 35 feet . Chapter ®15 i states that 1a df ox alterations within . s a G wetland areae must meet the juelsdLction .1 reqpitement(i and permit criteria of the Division of State Lands (DSh) b US Army . COrpei of Engineeort , Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) and /or ether . gederal, state or regional agencies. Therefore, a City of Tigard Sensitive Lands Permit for this purpose is not requited. However, all other appi,ioable City requirements meet be satisfied, including sensitive lands permits for areas meting non - wetland a weneitive land criteria. Since the drainageway on the southern portion of the Site LS in a wetland and the wetland is to be modified for th+%h purpoees of development, a sensitive lands peemit shall be re qu ired as per Se"tion® 18.8.._... C C � and j?� 1. These eeotio. ' state that such a permit shall be obtained before constructioe or development begin . ipp agev a,�oe are listed The approval criteria for modifications to dr+e�n in Section is.wirsAmigi. These applicable criteria are: �. • The extent and nature of the proposed land 'form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the uses 2 • The proposed land form a1toratifen or' development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on -eaitc and off -Site effects or hamAtde to life; or property; 3. The water flow capacity ity► of the draina4sway is not decreased 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to laid fort alteration or devielO *fl nt, the a be a not covered by structureea or impervious Surfaces will, be replanted to prevent erosion in accotdanoe with Chapter 18.100, ' Landscaping and Screening 5. The drainageway will be replae,-.eed by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flaw in accordance with the adcpted 1981 Master Drainage Plan; and 6. The necee+R�a ry U.S. Army Corps of Eiwjineere. and State of oregon Land' Abard, Divi®ton Of State L ,. a .. ... pp....� . a�n�►e a ro`ta►lai shall be obtained. pp Tnea a� roval criteria for ra<odlifea►tion® to wetlands section 18. 64. bg p (]D.)) are ba ®end upon the f indi:nge that all Of the fo11or ing Cri:teeria have hi2en ItAtibfiiadt 16 The proposed 1a ndto i� alteraticin or deve lo)aenenit id neittn � '' er on wetland in an e,rea as ®�..'n de g . Last ®d fic#nnt vaetlanid on they CbmprehOt4i va Plan F'loadplain and Wetiddd Iap riot id, within 25 feet of each a weetiend; HEARIN S' OFFICER - FINLEY/MILLER Sys 93-s ®o4 pAG1 3 • The extent and nature 'pi' the proposed 1andform alteration or development will not create sits disturbances to an extent greater than the mina.'aum required for the used . Any encroachment or change in on -niter or off-site drainage which would adversely impact wetland characteristics have been mitigated; • Where nat u al veaet a tion has been removed due to landform alteration or aevelgpsiltent, erosion control iorovisione of the surface water figement program of Washington County must be :met and areas not covered by structures or impervious p n likee or similar cieain accordance with Chapter 00 Landscaping and Screening- 8 • All other nenaitive lards requires me of thin chapter h' *ve been met; 6.. The provisiona of Chapter 18.150, Tree Removal, Shall be met:; • Ph- sisal, .ise i.tationa mid Natural Hazards, Floodplains and Wetlands, Natural Arcade, and Parks, Recreation and Open spaced policies of the Compreeheeneive Plan have been satisfied. S. Chapter 1 . a0 C fl . contains solar access standards for new residential devei, pment A lot Meets the basic solar access lot standard if it hat a north -south dimension of. 90 feet or more and has a front lot lie that is oriented within 30 degrees of a re,eeao e st -went axis. A subdivision cr, +mpltee with the basic req; ireMent if 80% or more of the newly created lots meet Or exceed this standard. 4. n standards for t e�y. The number of Chapter 1.8 92� conta3,ne dess�.a pe ne development area, 91c'e� on the excludingusensitive land areas and land dedicated for public i:oad5 or parks, or for private roadWaya. This land area in . then divided by the minimum parcel Oise permitted by the toning district to determine the number of iota which may, be created on a Site. 5. Chapter 18.102.030 apectfiee vision Clearanda i rianglee adjacent ... height p ins a, .. ig s, ete. are to i.r�ter ®eectier�ne in which the hQi. ht of lar�t :feet in height to asssure Safe and mate sight three f limited to Potential hazarde from Vehicular turnip ' movement tee reduce dis�taa��r® at i.xateare®eti.cora® rnati:vel trees may be limbed up to eight feet in height ...t, fee aingie. anilY 5. eChdpt = r 18.168.01g ce�nta� y p. residential vehicular aloes ° ins stare ardel ma rOavid+e eecess e a private drivdes� for a maximum of ai.x residences A conimon private accesaWag serves between three tO aik residences must be a minimum Ok 30 feet Wide w,.. ._. t width' of at iea�t h a. with a snir�i.aeus�s navemea� .. p fcESeet. curb and a walkway. HEARINGS ..:, .. Y _...... 04 AGE 4 Chapter 1173.1� ®.® ®3�) requireu a permit for removal Of tees having a trunk 6 inches or more in' diameter measured *our ' feat eve the ground on undeveloped , rG'eaidential land- 4 permit for tine rt oval must c s ply with the following criteria as specified in chapter 1 5sflRigs► a. The trees are disea<ssed, Present a danger to property, or interfere with utility z'ervico' or' traffic safety • The trees have to construct proposed . be removed to c imProvoments or to' othen4Yises the applicant's property in a reasonable; .lmannerr O. The treess, are not ntieeded. to . prevent eroaion�, instability, or drainage problems The trees are nearby" trees as not needed to .protect, windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shads and open space Th€ ..,,I •ta hetic character in the area will not be vieually adversely affected by the tree ,removal; and New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. Chapter 18'3 4 x.1Q: (nikeway ds for 'oikewaya. contains contains etanadar • fevelo m me adjoining proposed bike► aye identified on the adopted pedestrian /bikeway plan :shall include provieione for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements Cr tights- of -viay. • Development perm.t s , =. shed for plannted unit developments, fond . .. other dewo`losnts w�aic� will ��tions.l use ra>�its, nand. principally benefit fret dudii bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost of bikeway i aprovements. C. l° din mum with for 1sikeWays is six feet per travel lane. 9. chapter 111.1 g 4ggf. . oQAI coi,■tains standards f©' „4: the subdividing of BI! : parc els ro�� s into 4 or more lots: to be a pp r o v e d s, a preliminary plat must comply with the follA�iag criteria: ae • The proposal muc,,t comply with the City' a CoMprehennsive Plan, the zpplibabXt zoning ordinance and Other applicable e MO ordinances Mild regulations, The rot ded plat name P4 ti - must hot be clu....d�,i�alt�: i+s ,'lid tsrivat ot ijrwtike s atiilfy the provisions of ORS Chapter 92# • The etreCta and roads must be laid Out no as to conforld to the Plate of subdivisions and image of partitionse or subdivisions already approved for adjoining PoeoPertY as to width, general directi nn and in ail other respects 'unnlead nom... .. SUn 93roo�Q Pn 5 the City determines it , is in the public interest to modify the street or road , pattern/ and An xplanation has been provided for all Coltman improvements. 10. Chapter ;' Q.464.060 A2.L states that the depth of all lots :hall not exceed. 2 .-1/2 times the average 'lot width. 11. Chapter 18.164 also contains standards for streets and utiitiea. The applicable standards are an follows: • sections .164«.030'siA 'requires Streets: within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of them street. • Section 18 164.03k1,111 i 1L a requires local streets to be constructed with 34 feet Of paaem ..nt within a 9A foot right -o €-w :y • • Section 09 prohibi ts3i lot dept:: from being more than 21 timed the lot width„ and requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on either public or private streets, other than an alley: . Section 11.464.0 0 requires mideWalks Si adjoining all residential streets. e. Section 18.164.090. requires sanitary sewer service. • Section .111.L.641:10 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements for atorias drainage faef.Litie: B. Ap aliaabLo ffpX1 Cg begnaaiya .Plan oiie idd. 1• policy 2„1.1 provides the city will aea3ure that citizens will be provinde and opportunity to partiaip�ate in all phases of the planning ..ann d lopment review proddab olio. 3.1.1 A,a y pa�t�vl,dee that all development in areas iq�+enZti�.� ed a�s� 2. containing wetlands and slope in a *Cesb Of 25 grade be deli otd g g to comply witty approved engineering techniques to Make the area nuitable for the proposed develdpMent 3 Policy 4. :1 roidia th all development Within the Tigard Urban planning area shall comply with applcableaceral r state And tegia nal water quality standard , Policy _ 7.1.2 rssv►�.dea they Cit w�.11 r�l rea an air coarnditi ®stn of development approval that public water, nOwa ', a'axad et4rm drainage t41 l be provided and '' deb geed to City a tendards wiad utLlitiea placed i :ndoxgtbnnd : HEARINGS oPFIc "rt FINLEY/MILLER SUB 93,0004' PACE 6 • 6 • Y ices' with Policy � . � .� 1 provides the City will coordinate water .eery water districts. Folic 7.x,.4 requires quires all new development to be connected to an approved sanitary wewer system. Policy 7.6.1 requires that the development be served by a water having cr p protection tection pu�rpo►�es and t�r�t the Fire District pressure for fire ro review sl,l, such applications. • Policy 8.1.1 provides the City will plan for a safe and efficient . 1i' p street and roadway system that meets current needs and antic.pated future growth and development. • Policy 8.1.3 provides the Cit./ will require as a : preconditin of approval that: a. Development abut a dedicated street or have other adequate access; b. Street right-of-way shall ➢ dedicated where the street is substandard in width; c. The developer shall commit to conatroction of the streets, curbs, sidewalks to City standards within the development. d The developer shall participate in the improvement of r � rY � extent of the. existing streets, Curtis, and to the sidewalks developments impacts, e. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic h za rd. /V. NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS S Y az Deliartment hat reviewed this appli at Lon 1. The Cite of Tigard ®r�.��ie,. ens hail [stated that the a iAil able maps[: do hot show the 0xi.seting sanitary sewer i, .zse being 3,.ocate air indicated AS on the preliminary plate ... a!e CGeneral Te1epH ®n® beadle requested that the devssalo 6 r /builder Contact the GTE 'Engineer at :Least 30 date ; rtor to trench opening g � i 2 � ewed this application a9nd Ti ar _ of Ai.e�r;,wct a�� ha® nevi 3, has noted that ��t S t .Yr ... Imo- p. j g.. •to 3 ne �a d :atuadents for r Phil ��:s� Eletmv�mxtax~�,� t�chool c 1 n�- w s3taa«a an® ... _ ., �el® ®nt ss� ro ®c e c ®B,® 1 Pay Middle School, And 1 new tudent at Tigard High School o the School ELI District notes that the school eapaCity at the High School id alas = dy exceeded, although both Phil Leis Elementary aua► remi r Middle School .... ... , ... ent to he able to � ®n�i cores fa�arility below acre gyre ® ®nttly�sCiioo �i ®a ®ltffi i '�i ®triCt notes that the ideg paict�ile off. th,e High add tntiofs . Additional echool capacity way be pesavided by tithes optioriss tuidOt Cr nil .deration by the School Districts e.mzc .ud nga grade l 'oe1 .... gu i year, � . y. j . tmeiate, ce•ub1.e recr�rmf i . _ satioi►� resaChedulesi ®cnoml ear;'. tc+:.�adar sad u¢set MEAN/NOS OI FZCIE;fi «- FINLEY /MILLER SOS 9 rk -0004 PAGJ! 7 1. ti shifting, busing to under- utilit;r,3d 'facilities, . fv t ure bond measures leading to construction of new facilities' and c)thet' dchoo1 housing options. Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) #5 has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments s NPO t5 cam support this project as presented due to the obvious, sorsore, and negative impacts the resulting .moor vehicle traffic wil I have upon the existing Colony Creek neighborhood to the south it will be in the best interest of all parties a..o do all treet in r:eovemen' a first, as a contingency to any furthdr ' development. This,® ahou',d also inUaude a northern accenb that doed riot iaipaOt Hail Boulevard. kv"" #5 has also stated the following on an additional comment sheet: We see., no problem With this _ project as long as the following are done in cor unction with WAS development. 1) NO access to gull Boulevard; 2) the exietIng Colony Creek Court access to 3W Ball Boulevard Should ',,e vacated; 3) Downstream property owners Shoul4 be notified about this, projects' impact on the Fenno Creek bank /channel. Tualatin Valley Fire District CI has reviewed this proposal and had c arnw nted that no lees than 20 feet of unobstructed driving surface should be provided as all timed. Where parked cars will re8trict this . "No Parking" aigna Shelll also be installed in .ti's turnaround ��area of tine private drive:. 6. C1 "n March. 30th, the Plettniirig biviEsion reCeived a letter n E. L and ._ i = Finley wner® of the site) which presents two Specific requests yea Yt regarding the impacts of this proposal. The Ftnleye: tee:pest to retain the use of their existing driveway onto SW Nel1 Boulevard The F'3 -'11.0 YES also ®tt re that they do not want anything to retaining. cu tine fnabure development of the 0.54 acre sits, which they ar 7, The City 00 Tigard Building D iat T, vi®io, P ®a.�lan� General ElE31Gtr'.e.iC, kletro Area Conllnui icatione, and Tigard Water Di,a,riot have reviewed thin propo ®al and have offered no co iiente or objoidtiendi EVALUATION' OF REQUEST Sttbdivieion« p... s aw u ' .. ds of th�a 1. This ro ®ed au�.aivi�eidiax co lies! with the use standards lt-7 zoning di:rat. ict (tection 18.52.05q) „ beCBuae the al t',+ intetdad tc; be d evelope d as ®in g le feail detached an d dpi x dwe1iU v this zone. .....9 proposed d� un�.ca, both permitted ages 5 0� . aotits each tsar i.r� in size between in A and 11,850 he gars €eet-,, a_ g § NEARINGS OFFICER I X/ .4 LLER SUB 93 0.... .. oo4 as • pAGN 8 a,'re all eiclual : to or larger than aDhO mi niaaum requir ntr of, thi a *one (5, 090 square feet for aingl;e fa ily uSe, 10, 000 equate feat for duplex 1aa0) . The exial#10g rea ,dens greatly ekoeede c et,'oa %k regUirenaente. All prwpased vote are subject to the setback etandarde; of the H -I tone. Compliance with these et rAttde c 'iiil be reviewed as part of the building pereaib application prole ee for residential atcuctu�ee . The Orelimiftery Plat pen space area on tho northeastern corner l.at aRso i.ndcatee an o Of the site. the majority Or .thie open Area of within the 100- year floodplain of Panno creek. . eiva of the lots cloth f.uMliOr 123 127) meet the basis solar access requirements as specified in Code Section The front lot lima orientation of these lots is w1010 n $0 degreea of trams eclat -west. These lots slap. j rovidea atillttuat north -south di menoion of at least 90 - f set N ;mot 122 + xeeet 0 the. dimensional requirement, however the front lot liens i® oriented northe -south a lon g the ter�inu e of the private ve. � a betance of these l rttn ( lots 17/11 .130) do 00t, meet either of these two requirements Of tht 9 proceed tote, two ratty' be counted as the standard 20% exeV)tion from theaee eola;, lot requirements. These two a pt d lots shall t4 lots 122 and 128. The two r °ernaii ing 1otS (Tote 129 and 130) are. accepted by -staff ae . ...p ens #1 these etalandarde as r �3 ti ) . eotion 10. 1. e�c1,6 nee 100x, �.6s_r� ctf n of 5W Fanno Cre ut i :� �, the.. w .. , the ex�:enei.o � ek U�ciy; +� to -thp north Of they plus the configuration of this bite k. prahibi 6;s the appli„can1 ° a ability to p r propose a n alcernati ve street 400,lgi. order ' to utilize the buildable portions of to 0,6Atiabb the desired road pattern in this area, ' he applicant in similarly liiritad in the ability to create 10,td without redubning thde, total number of potential lots. Therefore, ie it reconraeluded tb,at these i emaining two tote be exempted-item the solar access qu � g ustMent to the re rement;s rtir�caa� din . to the above ref ®raanc�d ad design standards. ■ the proposed subdivision complies with the density standards of chapter 1 cha A... 8.92 4 ©20 (Aenai ty) . the net dovelopamle area of the site (after deduction of the public r, ,g �-. -w y.. the g ' ninig ht o� vas „ thc� ace ®a a r� with the existing residence, and the uhdeveldpable portions Of _ 1.21 ace thin to� _. site . ro:4P » »i:matei.' " 2 e 53 anc . With . c sae) � the g a ®sites i� approximately 52, 650 a .are fae� minion lot sire �.� 9, , ..it�N� tot 10 d��11�`��.� of 5, 000 equate feat • dwelling unit and 10, 000 equate feet xr .�, duplex units, thin site yields an opport.�n 3� in unite render the R -7 coning designation. The appliOaa' t a: proposed the creatioan of 9 lots containing 10 ` resi4encee :a th ®� °� by hat§ maxiagized the. allowable ditincitit and theirefcre cc' plies with this standarde, chapter 10,102 IVLeual Clsaranoej keildirdb that Adequate vision p reeetione. ... i. a t ' ehal]. -. be be rorf.ded at all, road i.rttae T ,i® a�tafndard sknal.l by to the requiz ements regarding g )'a , , ght satiefie� b _adher ®nce :. .. ., - ., and placement oc any future possible obateudtione iStatidL! g a' subdivieioxn Prior tic the inetail ti ►n 'of any HEARINGS OFFICER klit IE ' /MIttgR sUS , 93.0004 I' L PAGE is ouch sign a sign Permit r Planadtng Depart+aent must be obtained. The sign �:nert it o the and approval ;process will require a finding that the sign will be consistent with the requirements of Chapters 18.102 (Vision Clearance) and 18.114 (Signe). m Section 2 1 8 (Access) and Section 2L3.1 4.00 L B) (Lot rontaga ) are partially satisfied. All nix lots are provided with at least 25 feet of public or private roadrssy frontage. The lot which evil], retain the existing residence is prohibite1 access to SW Pa ... Creek Drive by the design of this preliminary plat. As addressed under the staff analysis of Section 18.164 below, it shall be recommended that the Ball Boulevard access to this residence be closed and that access be provided from the extension o SW Fenno reek Drive. This iot in intended to be approximately 0.76 acres in size and therefore, will retain the ability to be developed with S additional, al,,, residential units ( 6 total) under the current zoning, designation. The minimum access width for a private street serving sins led£dences is 30 feet. Thai City Lc not in a position to rec+ c mend approval of a situation which will result in a future need for a Va ria oe; in this case, an access variance. Given the potential developability v this lot and the City's recommendation that access be provided from the extension of SW Fanno Creek Drive, it is apparent that one of the weeteruiimmiont lots will be lost in order to provide the ability for adequate future access to tni k lot The balance of Lhe lots satisfy these code requirements by providing 25 feet or more of roadyday frontage four each lot and by providing a private roadway w ^°ich in at least 30 feet wide Which will provide access to six residences. Secticm 18e164.u60(A,L{31(b1 (Lots) states that the maximum let depth to width ratio is 1-1/2 to one. tots 128, 129 and 130 are shown to be 121 feet and 41 feet wide; This piroduces a ratio of 2.95 to One. With a 41 foot l e)t width dimension, these three lots exceed the MaXimilm allowable lot depth by 18.5 feet each pp, ,table to reduce the depth of these three lOtn The a��_ .�icant is not �tt►l without causing these iota to be shall er than the required 5, 000 equate re foot minimum. in light of the City's sT�conmtendati on t® eliLa0,, aaite one of theme iota in order to provide ode iaata access for future development potential to the existing residence, the add Width not used for `thy; Ame ®away may be added to Iotr i..o�ra�l with 128 and 1296 This adjustment in property lines plus a reduction in and produce lots which are approximately � bring these l�tea �n compliance to c lot depth to ;11,5 feet wou 5,522 square feet in aol�netment�a: applicant The a may l.i.carat did to apply alternative property line PF not request a variance for this purpose a r present, any information in support Oh one in the applicant ... .. . application packet a variaanubmitted tot rev�,ew. ... . waKmch was s The may choose' to pres "h to width yet. request to ` enable these Iota to _ exceed the lot depth andaxrd if they determine that Stich a request id needed. HEARINGS OFFICER FINLEY /MILLER SUB 93-0004 �..4 I •f 'MOH 10 0. • Sooti to .18 ° 5 ZQ E (Tribe - Removal ). requires that ,,the applicant or, " a tree removal, °. pf8rfl tt Prior to APPLY for, and receive ap��xovaal f to the removal of aqt tC•ee .;tneaeuring �' inohea or greater in diameter at a height of f air feet a Ove grade prior to the removal. of awj such tree from the a itec ' datai.led tree aurvey has not been 'anb witted as part of this r oipgliCatiomi. Therefore, prior to the i esuaxnce of a tree' ;0/oval rmit,' the applig4nt Shall' supply a ma p s i ly'rg the tr ®S® bein g requested gor, removal al as they e alate to: 1) Public i mprovements, and 2) building ' e,rnvelopes This information shall. Identify the type and ailge of all trees'' on thiR, site 'which are greater than Six. inches in dial ter relat Va try each tree removal permit app1icat:ion. .G The proposed subdiviOiaitn consiataant with the subdiV ision approval standards og Chapter 8 3.6O. Q6Q A . (S. a . The proposed subdivision tomplies with the Comprehensive y' _ density opportunity ' di�ara�l�entait Iles � �La'tn' p s� Me for the site as a Kash as wi4i. tha appiicaab,.e plan policies, - h pia able the regulations ®f the ]�, D gone, and other. a llc rep u1ationa r Colony Creek Estates ��T,se�i. name Of the subd �visiotho b. The prat f6) is not duplicative of y r plat recorded in 6 ahi',ngton County; cq The Proposed public and private streets provide for both adequate and safe access to the lots itt, this proposed s , ads visiOn; with the exceptici of the afore r ntionod t question relating to the lot which 1.s retaining the a�, vase qn existing resides o :, ''his p,:eliminar1 plat also prot71 es for the eaten ®ion, of a p►rop►o sed street stub abutting the adjacent propert( to the north. n f %Pith Code 2ectiolla t ccxndistent g o The progc��e� stxkdi�ision hot of bik �ai��'s'° was there is� no 16. tell t rding the pr 164 11Q 6eation bikeway indic ted on the prelim nary p° P plate, that a .......roval of dewelo nta adjoining cods . oduires p'� , . the pr apo6� ., d1Q k A .r be Conditioned et�►nt.aa • e coat or ,� . _.. Y i ®v to inc:�ude either t ®s.l ��6o0 not construction of ®bikeway impr � T ► a p ko The cede' %peeifiee 6 'fast ,f.nci.udart either of these twaa �►pti.etns. per travel tarns which l s applicable i �ay along tet f a m ]t wi of eight feet hae been hiato;i oaiiy required _ obikeway alg anno cteeka Therefoc®; the pre1L ninary plat shall be revised indicate the provieion of a aved b ikawsy with + t. The ati.grti<inen+ of this bikeway. shad ` ®niimiatYa width of sar Sfe plain � ., .. � . � e tai. . .. r f i,00d baain of its n�ao Greek, gar Shall b... r�rbviddd by eaaenaw : t, and Shall l orreapa�nd and the., pending �wi t�,in the lob! p x ,. 03) AS bkrmway section to the Hors', . , . skews taw �ca _ .n, ,(� ®® � �hle 6 and �� 93 �(�nti.n�ae- will A ► provide the opportunity southward from the eater. RERn s OFFICE - FINLEY/MILLER sus 93- -0004 PAGE 11 10. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has revf awed the proposal and offers the 'e.o].Ioc ii g all lysis with regard to streets, sanitary sewers and sitcom 43rainage Streets This site conti trs as exietiav siritglo filthily residence' which gaitrim its access from ,S4 Hall Hou dvarr(4. In addition, the site also hatas,` ac :est2t from SW 7&;u no Crer,:a 'Drive though it is not being used at this time. eased on th'e prelimi,Atry plat, the applicant piropese! � ±: y property lime to serve to extend ��! Fan�na �..a��c Drive to ths� north a ,portion of the Jt,Nvelo raent, to extend, a privade drive fz Um St I Fenno Creek D ve tserve portion site, are to introa th:, existing etin g access on SW Hall Boulevard for the existir4 her-. e only. South• ;deb Fanf• Creek Drive is clagnified aze a local street and is fully iMprOVed t� local street etancla ids, The .'pplicant pro poeea to boil , the extension of SW Fannd7 , Cr e]s Dri*se .to ,kca1 . atreeu sr!aa_ ds. These. ®ta axda require e $0. foot rig�iF.c -of way dadicatit, with curbe and i$idewe;lko on both aided, It ahruld be noted the applicant hag it*s +rIrect3,-y labeled street on the pri41%iminary platy The exteniaion ct this 'Street should be ramped S1 Fannno C, eek brive and not S ► Co].R.;ny Creek Drita Scnuthweia Half _ ,. a to and t Hell, Eioulav�:.xd .® under»' the . ur�iedictioi f the Ore on DepartMe t of Transportation QDOT . Half t \trust ism roves n right.-Of-Vey dedicati ®n to 45 feet fret centerlinne are typically raquP red for developimente which ° front SW Hall Bou.levard A's of ` eport, ODDe'C has ne:�t eubm ivied its cent o to the City Fas thi na Baited past - �► the vic,�.r►ity of thien elevs.de ent, the ; etaie willl,, be requesting half street Divieimn. ad on: d�ci . ,. .. -ed oan the a licannte vubmi'i tat, they are prepared provilsment:: and r3. htaof via s��iication to �� feet from centcsrli.naa. Bats p'F to pr cviie the nalf street L no p rovem �;nts wifa the required right of -way deyication. Ad ravValiEl . y t there i a n existing � ... g f aiin .3.y residency h. e. nibhgisiteaoceasfromSW_o It .. ' � sy. ®o b� noted. that 'gall esoulev� d.' oft t,a mite which gain's r 0u] t this recess ie Shared with the proper o the north (TL 101), lots 700 and 701 (both under the ®acme owg'aerahi a pure ' n 0 under review by the City for aubadivii ion approval (Sth 93-0006) Sections .18e162,860 Of the Oornmunity ID MveibOtalit 0r de sate approtal etandarda for Major Zand partitioning, Wh,t dh ro for to Section Zei. l0S o b60 ,. Seotiott la 6108.060 (B) P,i at(e t Direct . adiv .du 1l access to arbitial ar 6 /lector Fttreete attall urag04. D i.rect access to iiu jot or „,allector or arteria l titr& a e a that' be conai■dered only 14, there 3.e no . alternative' naa y, to aCiGead the eite. based on both. , the eubdivieion ap pl].cat,'!,ona, there are several alternatives tO having the aecee3 for ' suss iota provided fro SW ..:..... xitiz,,.ii SU .. &3E�t�Ca 1�71FE°�C:�13. - �” �II+I��t SUB 93 -0004 Phi= 12 iFft r Fenno Creek ;Drive rather than . SW Hall Bouilevard.Therefore, the applicant should be regeired to provide access to the ers ietie, ' single family resstetence from SW Fenno e.reek re ive. This access should be wide enough to accommodate pe entisl future development. /is stated above in the riari zei of Section 9.8 AO the width of this acceseway shall be a milimum of 30 feet. The a i icants " engineer provided a copy og W» Opgli,catioaa form to the Planning Di-vAini . a on April 15, 1993 wh ;a* WAS submitted to LOOT for approval _ to construct a road approach for the driveway ` If this permit is issued by 'v)D �cce�,s� onto Si' �),� 1�a1]. Boulevard. y , it shall be apparent taut it is not cw rently necessary for this driveway access to be closed. Therefoyee, the City may waive this condition. The city, i csdrrently reviewing three Subdivigion applipatione SIM 93-00030 SUB 93 -0004, and SUB 9e-0006) X006) and has approired one Site Development Review (SDR 92- x)020) in this area ?ill four applicabione are teenrected in tha•tit they are all Adjacent properties. 7f all of these applications are approved and built, SW Fanno Creek Drive etiuld be completed And ,would connect with SW Hall Boulevard. Ctarrently, theta is on existing temporary access SW Colony Creek Court, The purpose of this temporary access is t to SW Hall Ha�>stlevard frosm pA '"y" to pravide the eXie.ting neighborhood With access' to SW Hall Ecealevard until such time as SW ratisio Creek Drive iss ca5ple\ ed and connected with SW tall Boulevard. It should be noted that when SW Faeno Creek Drive is completed and connected with SW Hall Boulevard, the Cite will lose off the temporary =coatis to SW Hall Boulevard that exls is at the west terminus of SW Colony Creek Drive, Sa;r>litar _ seem: There ie an existing 8 inch public sanitary aewekt line loCatecl Within SW Fenno Creek Drive. The a lied i t la Pp� proposing te~► connect art3.on ®� th eddevelopment, d e s�m�r' liana td, sserwe the ifesatersds portion d rner of the development existing The aF%►iicaint proposing to connect to, end extend, �asisti to, , serve the ea tern por �,on o'. the d..9vel enc. T t�is� line ng 1,isr,�es have the Capacity to an,cedmitsodate this devo opsment. This cornc'atioan shall be pk. eid , d by an a;o ►s the affectesd t�orticn of lot 122. This easement easemn ®an ac b all also be extended to confl ct to the greenwaly and to provide deatrian access to the btketvay. Thin easement shall be paved tt, a minimum eldth of 6 f riot to prow ?.de imitable Accede to the bikeway. C. �r��. qj+ �7�q ■r� {g �y (� �p �'b� ®d4�11G {p.h��nia.�F�/ p The xo Dread to drain g y toward �: site e�.eb of the ' .. eans��h The 'a�p�aslcent �® ea'ieranll � ins srer�a,°th p , of the Elite to the existing public storm sews p y a� o ® Private ,street and .. the lets ��hat front r se ®t.:e�l, Tn • ,* Creek apt the northeast + orear of the it will drain into Fansro HEARINGS OFFICER - FxNL-Ey /t Il HR 8i1S 93 -0004 PRCh 13, ai l°e., Since this storms drain will need to cr;Oea a pOrtion of the Plidroll to the north y a etc r n drairkagl7,. easement ®hall be required etroaa tote affected portion', of tax 1Git 700. The Unified Sewerage Agency harp eats o ,iahed and the City has agreed to ‘40,force iftooltation and Orde ik No. 91-47) surface Water 8e,nacie:s nt r a1ulationet requiring the ci,t.notruotiOn of on -site water g�iaiLt r f acili ti s or fee® in -lieu of their construction. the applicant has not proposed any on -site water quality itacility. Xt is the City's a opinion that, due to the size :)f the de ,relopr lent and the) existing storm water facilitie 'o,. that the creatiF_! rah 'ouch a facility would be inappropriate for this development. A, fee in- lien ' or its construction should be required Analyeia =,, Sense„ tve ;Land® Revimi The prmpoeal to fill a Ara na„ ewa `near the south rn portion of the site in the vicinity of lots 125 and 126 to the regnlatione specified by Section at ' 4.. asspecified below: • The extent and nature of the pro aoced lanai germ aaltera tio.ri or develops lent will not crenate wit a dietvrbance greater than that required in order to re so ::fly devetop this portion of the Site. The rya* % , owed' land Zorm alteration or development Will not reat[a,t in Stooiorn, atresm i edLmentatinti, ground in 'ota.knility a ' or othrer adver ®e on^ -nity 2 and oL'f44bite effect® or hazards to life or property. As Stated in the Wetter received from S? 11 which wvae atibitdAtted Wa.t +h this application, the estimated impact will likely not exec tid "la to 35 cubic yards. An the cubic yv.:a Min meuiat be exceeded,' 40 etatiae permit or review throueyh tine Orego tt Division of Lanad3 is required. c . The water ... er flo w ca iaOity is not decreased in that adequate errn drainage, facilities Shall be re itTz i.ch Will mare Than replace . of ti�iepl;i,ti�� "� �aedci��•� s� . �.... , . by the f f �:1 ii�g� wraa a cs abil,i.ti.ee 1 ® ®t b nageway. . d. Most of the area affected by this MOdiiidation will be covUted eiener by strvttUree or by imperviop,\ a surf ads e. the balance of thie land Will eventana1ly 11ndadarped through the inrtallatien of residential yards« e e. the dr; iru geway will be replaced by a ieiatlitt of pri:U'ate etor>n drains which+ Will connect to a. at�Jrm drain to ' bs locatud in the privaie drive referred to ids -Tract Aa Thz® atorcm mlyatom will provide outflow t� ranho Creek. ▪ Ho Permit's are ; neyp.:eoaaa y from the tit. S. Arty Corp og taagineers, the state of Oregon Laid Soofd or the Divi Lion of State tandN HEARINGS OF1?;.. Ie''ER pl SUS 93.0004 � ay /t�lL� ' tN PAGE 14 This Minimal la id f oxen modification ,Q.a net within or adjacent to the 100 -year flood plain. . ' The proposal t ∎ ' area near the 6outhern ■portion of the site in ";:he vicinity of lots 125 and 126 is within the regulatierta specified by section 18.84.04010), gar epecifi,td below: a The area proposed to be filled is not drJsi gr ted on the Citys' Comprehensive Plan PlOod * ain and laetlarci Map nor is it within 25 feet of such a Yetland; b. The 'extent and nature oaf this landform al.teratima wYill not create disturbance to an extent greater than the minimum required for the requested use; c. The proposed change in the cbainageway will not adversely impact any wetland characteristic s. The preliminary wetland Assessment provided by Scientific Read,ce5 (SR%) states that the width of the wetland averages about 2 feet lid.thin the project. The wetland is fourd immediately at the base of the Swale and does not extend ctpslope nonce than 6 inches The functional value of the wetland ie stated as 1')eing very low; d. Broslon control provifaicne of the Surface ''dater Management Program Storm s p ided which wL conn get to a catch bas in located nor∎ th of "ldt' `'124 . This water will then be discharged into Fanno Creek; G. All other cppl.icable sensitive lands requi;c ' e :fie of this chapter have been met; f . Tree removal al permits shall be required for all site work. g All applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies have bee a satisfied as addressed in this reccm ndatioin. • Comtili once irslth .�mnreensivo 3aae P►�.i 1. The subdivi ®ion is c*nnietent with Policy 2.3. !. because Attica the application and the public bearing on thie item was provide to thtiz. neighs' orh ®cad planning organization `NPC 4g) and to owners of property within the notification area Of the site. An ad has bOen placed in Tigavd Tip Which, a d _. .:. placed �s which ha® advert�.sepdp the tia�►e add, place of the public hearing to he helm on thin application, 2. In order to comply with Policy 4.2.1, a condition ie warted to .. t t an nauringt require tltQ developer to Prepare an dreeioni control, plan ntin Aive�_r. compliance with erosion ton oo rtrdot standards for the Tudi Basin are t o ) ... irag permit application. It, le re; .smiended t . ,t the developer ehall pay a f _ . the .: � � .. .5f th c inetrnncrtion of an can -bite Wattle quality facility, ee� rn ,eu I Y�F ;i't3CS O1FIc$R a "^` •St !93-OOt4 PAIR IS This subdivision proposal complies with. Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend public sewer and water systems to thiz site and will provide for underground installation of phone, electricity, and cable televis3. in lines. The subdivision proposal complies with Policy 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposed extension, and improvements to the street withio and ad j cent to the subdivision will contribute to a safe and efficient street System in this area. The creation of an extension of SW Fenno Creek Drive, and the creation of the two private drives, wi'i.l 1b1 roquired to be improved consistent with tie City of Tigard standards for public local and private streets, respectively. VI. CONCLUSION MD RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division ooncludes that the proposed subdiviSior ., Will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly' detrimental act injuri.ous to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after thi J decision complies with applicable local, state and federal laws. In recognition of the findings staff recommends APPROVAL of Subdivision proposal SUB 93 -0003 for the proposed Bridgeptwis subdivision subject to the conditions which follow. ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FIPZACIRLLY PAS3URED PRIOR TO RECORDING TM FINAL PLAT WITH WASBING'.kON COUNTY. UNLESS OTHERWIS ' VIE STAFF CONTACT FOR ALL RECOMMENDED CON T ' "IONS 1E1 CHRIS DAV'IES It VNG/HERRING DEPARTMENT, 639-4171. The a*;;pl3.,caant skull submit a reeViaed pre?'i,imminatu y plat which demonstrates the provision of a minimum of an eight foot wida bikeway within the. 100 year flood plain of Paso Creek. Alternativ sly, this bikeway may be provided by easement. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy, Planning Divisian. 2. The applicant Shall provide an easement across lot 122 to provide for the connect ion of the sanitary Sewer to the a ri.sting line This easement shall be extended to provide tietdest ian f,. ccefe to the oreaenway provide paved a minimum Width ox eight and bikeway. This easeia►ent s��all be sued to feet to rovide usable acceSei to the bikeway. 3. DirOct acetate onto SW Hall Boulevard Ohs~ i net be permitted, A new aoc040 shall be provided from the exist ing house to SW Fanno creek evra shall be at lea.,it 30 feet wide in order to Or�.ve. Thai® aeceCes... y p _. d: P. y .,gl mayvbe W iv d if COOT approves t!n application to Construct an Approach Road; for the driveway which intersect a Has .. aoulevard and Serves the existing residence Full Width Stt eet iMproveMents, including traffic central dev ,cee, ae F lu? ter ®; concrete sidewa ► ke, driVelittay'apecatei OUrbet, asphaltic dontrete pavement, sanitary Sewers, .Storm dra inagei sta eetlighta, and underground utilities £hail be ifStalled within the Onbdividion. HEXRIN �R OFFICER - FINLEY/MILLER SUIT 93 0004 PACE 16 b!, re- C $.k Improve.. ants shall be deeigaiod and constructed toe local., street etandarde . The applicant eha.l. Obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Higheay Eivieion, to, perform Woralr within the 'right -of -way of SW Hall Boul.evaz d. A copy of the permit shall be provided to ` the City Engineering Department P rior to iee uance of a Public Improvement Permit.: Additional r ,ght- cif -way shall be foonveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through the Department of Transportation, Highway Division, ' along the sites' SW Hall Boulevard frontage to increase the right -of --way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be, tied to the existing righteofeway centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State, shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. p (Poet /additional information, contact Myron Melick; Oregon Department of Tra nar portation, Righteof -Way Sect { on, ? 165 SW ;l'ir Loop, Tigard, Oregon 972 x,"3, 684-153.0). Standard half -street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic ccncrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall: be Lnetalled along the SW Heil Boulevard frontage- ImPrevlamente shall be designed and construct ed to Oregon Department of Transportation street standards and shall conform to the Alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved kris than Engineering Department Typically, • the City will else require that ail utilities ek al'l "hay ....placed underground along the sitOi , SW Hall Boulevard frontage. However, if thia is found to he unpractical in the judge/Mont of the Engineering 0a:.partment in the review of the detailed improvement parts, the applicant may instead pay a fee in -lieu of undergrounding ut litiea along this frontage. Two (2) sees of detailed , public improvement plane ; nd profile conotruction dingo shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval iNoTEg therm plans are in addition to a ay drawings required by the Huilding Division and should onl y in e lode sheets relevant to public im rovemente. ®• An erosion control plan 211al1 be provided as pa:# o!' the pt*1itt improvement drawings. The plan Shall conform to '"Erosion Control Plane xechnical Guidance Handbook, Novefltbee 1989. 1l. �the i applicant ccnt shall pay th e f e_ e as eStabliekec wnder the gui d eli e s °eWOra e A g ehc y Reaol tion and order Pao. 91-47. U0Prie., this is two pullet fee which is paid at twe berarate tieee. the first part is paid wi ;h an aeeooiated public improvement for that Poi-it/40 of the pd h reaa lee the L ij krviour area within the public i.ght dlaavelo ent Which ins of,wayo The Second part Lam plaid at the time Of Ba ildi.ng Permit issuance for each individual let. BEARINGS OFF ICER ... - fTE.. ?,. .Y/mI. L a E. R SDB 93 Malt 17 The applicant all d y g e dischar ed to the existing dr inagwas without significantly Impacting 'properties downstream. 13. Storm drainage details shall be provided as pert of the public improvent plans. Calculations and a topographic map of they storm drainage basin service area shall be provided as e supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, prop sed, and future lines shall be addressed. A storm drainage easement shall be provided across tax lot 700 to the north,, thereby providing adequate outflow for the storm sewer located in the private drive shown on the preliminary plat as Tract A. 14. 18. A gr ding plan rohall be submitted showing the existing and proposed ., vontowrs and typical finished floor elevations on each lot, including elevations at /b different corners of the floor plan tied to the top of curb elevation,a as shown on the public improvement plane. 1f . he existing residence shall' be connected to the public sanitary sewer system. 17. The applicant shall make an appointment for a pre econsteeetiOn meeting with the city of Tigard Engieeoring Department after approval of the public iamprovement plane and prior to beginning Work on the site. The applicant, the applioant ° s engineer and contractor viaall be required to attend this meeting prior to tdoeivin , the approved plane and permits. 18. Construction of the proposed public improvements shall not cotmterace until after the Engineering neparxntent karts reviewed' and approved the public improvements plans, a street opening permit or conatrueti6n compliance a,greeMeft a had been executed, execution of a developei t,- engineer aasr e;emerdt aad payment of all permit lees. Prior to recording the plat with Washington County, the applicant shall commitment. ve the applicant may record the plat after commita� ®nt.th�s an al.ternati percent fh er PP shoe se�uranco or plat ..e ft® the public improvrements have been accepted by the City Of Tigard and the appropriate Maint, dance Bond has been posted. 20 Prior to the recording of that Plat with Washington County, the City of Tigard will ensure that the "etreet plug" is dedicated to the public. The "street plug` is ,shown: as Tract 01C" on the Colony Creek Estates- Plat tihich was recorded on Page 10 in Enek 47 ,Record of Town Plate of 1a.1dh ng on county. del. ih tree earvey identifying the type and elate Of all trees on the site Which are over 6 in bia inches in diameter shall be auitt > d m Thie surve. shall also Sppec'ify those! tree which are prospoeed for removal in. Gonna^ j t�iQ cn ucti ►n of .public.imn�r;ovem . tree removal tialn with o►�t permit Shall be app r ed. ,eor and approved by the Plithhitig Division prior to the reireoval of any such trees On -Site. $414 10. CONTACT: Victor Add, ri, plarina:ng Division. HEARINGS OFFICER F'a; . TEE APPLICANT' Siouw1 Ds REQUIRED O COMPLY WITH' TO THE IHISHAHCE OF BIJILDIN A tree euruay ldentifyng tae .type anoff. ei�e� ' a# Ail, tree n. on the cite' which are Over diar eber ' aha i» bit submitted.. This survey shall a icify thoare tree which_ ate piarappaad ,f,Qr t #4l 3.x! cairra�n fairs a , „ tla„�, ,;aaou au` cti.Pn of l` "fib; 4e at .' ..tt001 r da L Ste" snit i hair applied 'fear and ctpprOVed `',,'the► Plannin4 D :v ®'s iti: c r: 'to 0.*'14010a1., of any , a >Liah treee • BTA1 'F cO AGT R Victor:: uteri g' Pla tnin I iltieiL sysprvISION APfROVAL SHALL BE SID ONLY IP THEE FINAL PLAT ZS SUBMITTED ITHIN' x !TEN MONTHS 6P THE EFFEoTIvE DATE OF Tins DECISION+ rep ay Ey: Ron Pmt i y Date ,' Aeeiatant Planner ved B3 t I; j Dit:k Biewe. orfi Date Senior Planner LEGIBILITY STRIP 89th: AVE el8 th AVE. -S 21v. �■ 86th AVE HAL L SW: 84th OT . IM 1 83rd CT CREEK 3 IZ O 'V'l L,L AGE ; CONDO MI NWMS` A 734 -1897 RECEIVED PLANNING APR 301993 April 2G, 1993 Lit of Tigard Planning . Department, Attn: Ron Palmeroy 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard OR 97223 Subject.: SUB 93 -0Q06 VonlieJ ie yen SUB 93 -0004 Finle 7'' filler, Bea'" v0.rton" -'Tualatin Hw r, .7)..f Tigard T.gar As a foliowu p of m y y recent telephone conVerss ation with yoU, 1 hereby an documenting items that we discussed.. First, in conformance with Oregon Department of 'Transportation access management p oli� y, access for the s b j ect parcels should be taken frog SW Colcqy Drive and not directly to Hall Boulevard, . Second if t g single � access to the existing - fami�. � the existing � � residences i, allowed to remain, easements must be provided to acccamm© a : c future access to SW Colony Creek Drive. Previous comments pravided by remain in effect. Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'' District 2A Maintentttce Supervisor ;1L ' CODE: Robert P. Duran Assistant District Manager RPbpeg Tamire Clark PO Jox 25412 Portland, OR 9722501412 (503) 229 -5002 City of Tigard ?lariming 1».partment Attn: Ron P4tmeroy 1312 , SW Mail Blvd. -igard OR 97223 rj t: UE 93 -0006 'V� i nBr SUB 93-0004 FimleYikilillerf avet a»- C a1at: t Hwy, City of Tigard :3 follouruP of 2tt Y recent telephone co»vs41rsation With you, hereby am documenting i.telus that W'3 disow seda First, in confo rM s »oe With Oregon Department o a »al:L..C» access Cana ga»c p iiay, access for the subJect parcels should be taken SW Colony Creek Drive and not directly to Mal Boulevard is 5e osida if the existing access to the existing air gle 'eaidenceg its allowed to reitain casement rust be provided to act oadate future access ,ese .to SW colcoy creek DxJ.we - .ter.... - DEPARTMENT 0'".. TRANSPORTATLL, N 01$tr st 2A Malsettottu Sopertior Previous comments provided by DOT retain in effe ct. Si.eere.ya Robe; t P. - Doran Aes1staht District Manager APIA: poe cog Tai,' ib a Clark Post* brand tax transmittal rn®mo 7671 # cl gimps' te g k 25412 Por tan c % X7225 -Q412 ( 3) g201$04 14010 S. . Hall Blvd. Tigard Oregon 9722 March, 6 ; . 1993 . Mr Ron Pomeroy Tigard City Han 13125 S.W. Mall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Pomeroya Re: rile No. Sub 93~°O004/SIR 93_0003 This letter :.s to summarize the concerns I expessed to you during oti*► telephone conversation on Thursda y afternoon, March 25, 1993 • of ro .erty at S.W. owners o 1�. We are long-time p p , � . 0 �. d � �' Hall t of , and beside, property that ,,has been Blvd. in from p purchased for development by Tom • We do not ob ect p deve to merit b � ©m Miller.. to this development; but we world : ike assuranc€, of two things. 1.: ,We ' do not, want, anything' `to : interfere °wi:t1).'' our driveway access to S.W. Hall. i This driveway has beer, n this location 'for at least 75 years. Our � ro pe:. rt does not at a. djoin any ® her • ru ad . We have sp ent several thousand do tars �m prQV�n g and maintaining ri g the drive. When the Mate Highway' ltment p urchasold some frontage from us in 19r9 a the ntaledtraffic lights which facilitate traffic from our drive, McDonald Street and S.W. Hall Blvd 2. We do not want anything to preclude the future P dress. development of the �� ache we own at this ad : "..;s. :.. , .. " has been _there is now one house on. this land. This k� 'h we �a�y family h 4�me since around 2 91 . Althoug the Finley f recur current puns for adding houses Ito Our property, we do want to be sure we can maximize �.tl� `V' ue to our heirs. we do consider it a major part of our estate. 'hank y ,u for your consideration: of these. ,matters. S,it'nca rtly'. ' Lois Ann Finle a», • LAND LAIC USE NOTIFICATION DIVISION OF STATE LANDS WETLANDS PROGRAM 775 Summer Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97310 503/378 -3805 Cou AL2N Local Case File No, 9'3- . DSL File No.: Cl ty. APPLICANT: /y Sus 1 �__ name street ___ cit state zip phone LANDOWNER: name ! % Ufa. I t t u d c street city state zip o phone, 3. LOCATION: T 1/4 ._._.... Tax Lot(s) ...,.., l,• MI quad map name (attach copy With s to indicated) ntached: NW.1 map Parcel map Site plan Other �. SITE IWFOSTI(kl hill Wetland Classification Code(s) R 3oW Soil Series Name (optional) r/No In Floodpl Adjacent Wa�� way (i any) �� :,� Current Land Use ..cietArtrai c s .e. Zoning 5 PROPOSEr0 PROPOSE ACTIVITY: site plan approval X subdivision _ grading permit Planned unit development ._._.._ conditional use perm It building permit Zone Change to Project Description: W.012 q ittS.AatiflosaLZarWtarEsAgate Arms in7 Y public ....:.. works Loewy) other =A ± a rcnnpl eted by/Contact Address erbAse form Is to be cenl.tod oai, y by piJnn:ing depbrtn sn sta;t'?p" Date Phone � ... fog, itioppeed eraatlands) DSL RESPONSE A removal .4i 11. periiilt i s .required frogin t9ee Div sio of State lands. U A removal -fill permit viill be requ p project proceeds: fired when the d�,velra..�ient A. reirroal be required U Information needed Includes A eetl and • deterti naton/del i neation report CI State permit C has leaned has been applied fora too reottoval -fill permit is rgqui red. for the described project i f /because ,....,_�. -..rte A permit may be required py the Corps of Engineers (326-6995) • CQlintgntr .. Date . Resp.�s�se •ecmtp y » l eted b �f the project is clan a to lnvolrre fi,11 r 9 etr�ova. t're: i.hp' Wetlands area; state removal �f i l l pereii t Wi l l be regsi red TO Ron Pomeroy March 30, 1993 FROM: Chris Davies, Development Review Engineer SUB 93 -00)04 - FINLEY /MILLER Descrt; The a pp licant proposes to divide a parcel of approximately 1. 69 acre. into 9 lots. 1. Streets: The site located Curren�;lyt the site h�s Bali Blvd. /S.'Wa M %D�snald i S.W. St intersection. t1sting single family residence on it which gains its access from S.W. Hall Blvd. In addition, the site also has access frog S.W. Fenno Creek Drive though it is not being used at this time Based on the preliminary plat it is the applicants intention to extend S.W. Fanno Creek Drive to the north property line to serve a portion of the development, to have a private drive off of S.W. Fenno Creek Drive to serve the eastern portion of the site, and to maintain the exiting aoe ess on S.W. Hall Blvd. for the existing home only. S.W. Fenno Creek Drive is classified as, a local street and is fully extend north The applicant is proposing to extendedioothe local the property line, and build to local street standards S.W. Fenno Creek Drive. It should be noted the applicant has incorrectly noted on the preliminary plat the public street name. It should be called S.W. Fenno Creek Drive and not S.W. Colony Creek ' Drive. S . W. Hall Boulevard is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation (0.17.0 -. T.) Half Street improvements and right -of-way dedication to 45 feet from centerline are typically required for developments which front S.W. Hall Boulevard. As of this report, 0.D 0.T. has not submitted its comments to the City Planning Department. Based on past decisions in the vicinity of this opand right-of-way tins requesting half street improvements y to 5 feet from centerline. Based on the applicants submittal they ar�� pp �.y N prepared to provide the half street improvements with the required right-of-way dedication S.W. As existing : single family residence on the Site owhich b� gaanshits access from hall Blvd. It should also be noted .chat this is a shared acce!3s with the property to thG north (i.e. Th 701) and that Tax Lot 700/101 (both un e.& the Same • ENG�.2JEERTNG COMMENTS. SUB .9,•34..4••• FI1�LE' ..� . Y /MILLE�t ownership) is under review by the City for a subdivision application (StaB' 93-0006). Both applications for subdivision intend to extend S.W. Panno Creek Drive to serve the proposed developments. Section 18.162.060 of the Community Development Code sets approval standards for Major Land Partitiortinge which ref rs back to Sefltion 18.108.0608 Sec. 18.108.0' 0B. states that di roct individual access to arterial or collectr, , streets Ohal ti be '. discouraged, and heat direct access to arter4l streets sl,tal1 , e cow idered only is no alternative way to access the site. Based on the :wiui division alications there are several alternatives to having the access for these lots come from S.W. Fanno Creek Drive versus S.W. Hall Blvd. Therefore, the applicant should be required to provide access to the from S.T. Fanno Creek Drive and to existing single �am3.ly residence 701 231 2 DD from S.W. : Fanno 'Crek Drive. applications (SUB The City is currently reviewing 93 three b006 and has approved one Site 93- 0003, SUB 93-0004. a�� SUB - applications Development Review 03-1)1t92 .0020) in this area. All four are connected in that they are all adjacent Drive pe ti be completed were a roved and built S.W. Fanno Creek j . b Pp � � Hall , Hall � oulevard from S W Cds an and connected with S W Hall S.W. SBooulevaarrd. Currently, there is.oan r existing temporary access temporary access was ' to provided the Creek Ct. The purpose of the p neighborhood with accesQ to S.W. Hall Boulevard until such time as S.7, Farm() Creek Drive was completed and connected with S.W. Hall Boulevard. It should be noted that when S,W. Fanno Creek Drive is completed and ck`)nik,•cted with S.W. Hall Boulevard the City will close off Hall Boulevard that exist at the west tttermin s+J of yS W. Colony Creek Drive Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8 inch public sanitary line located an dry seder li ... o c a nt is proposing to within S.W. Fannno Creek Drive. The applicant and extend, the sewer-line ne to serve ,.i� {e+ western portion of c� connect to a d � � �^ is on existing 8 inch line at�dvelopmPnt . In addition, there applicant the de is ast corner of the development . The app looproposing in he northeast .. - w serve the eastern is to connect to and extend this line to s pment. existing .. the ,�� . y to b p this .. The exi.� l�:r�es have n c��aci �. t onion of the develo handle i development. Storm Drainage The site slopes towards the northeast,. The applicant is proposing .,� , site t o the existi:nglpubliL. storm `sewer to drain The1p� portion of the � � s � .. syste .,. private it will drain'`. m, ri.�+raLe street and the lots that front Fanno Creek, E tGTN E,RING COMMENTS SIB 93 -04 'INLE'X /M;C L R' The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and, the City has agreed to enforce (Re,t oluticin and Order Teo. 91 -47) Surfaco kcater Management Regulations requiring the construction of on- Faits water quality facilities or Itees in -lieu of , their construction. The applicant his not proposed any on-site water quality facility. is our opinion that due to of the devel.opmont and the It ' p o the size existing storm water facilities that a facility would be inappropriate and that a fee in -lieu of its construction should be required. ALL CONDITIONS LISTED BELOW SHALL B E SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY AS S U . ~D PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. 1. Direct acces s onto S leva1.d shall not be t�ermi,tted. A new access shall be ptovid td from the existing house to S.V. Ela,nno Creek Drier 2. Full width ,� treet improvements, including traffic contro:' dev ;,ce5, mailbox cisa.sters, concrete sidewalks, driveway ape asphaltic concrete pavement, s � ,. � .:: streetlights, its, and underground utilities shall be i��7,stalled the Subdivision. iznprcverents shall be designed and constructed to local street- standards. 3 The appla�,can w shall obtain a permit from the ,State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work w:Lthi.l the right-of-way of S.W. Hai Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to isuance of a Public Improvement Permit 4. � conveyed the State of Orego!ti, by ArX�;�titigrial right-of-way shall be conve cd to th and through its Department of Transportat�,ion, Eigh��iay Divisio i, along the S.W. Hall BouleVa yd frontage to increase the right -of -way to 45 feet from centerline. The ci ncrIption shall be i:ied to the existing r,a. ht• -o Centerline. Ver y fication that the conveyance � g ' g f -�wa, u� ee has been submitted to the State, shall be p�: ov'ided to the City i � ment sanitary ;sewers st� o m drainage, Efrlinek ring Departm': .1t r (Vol,: additic l*.al information, contact Myron .. S - '.. Meli.ck; Orr: gori Deprx tment of Tr °ansportation, Right-of-Way a.y Section, 7165 SW Fir Loop, Tigard, oreg .m 9/223, 684- 1510) Standard half-street imp�.o'rements ? ucli ding concrete sidewalk, driveway apron; curb, asphaltic concrete pavement' sanitary sewer, reet lig underground ate . A Improvements l b storm drab n�, „� e, s�,. �hts � a�:`� �.evard �r ®nt � it ties shall bF. installed along the S.W. g W . Hall ou � to Oregon Department �►f 9 r � 'dad . Transporrt� tion street standards Sand shfil` conform . alignment P i c,�m to the of existing adjacent improvements or to an aiignnten,' approved by the Engineering Department. BI GINEEI ING • COMMENTS e 'sup 9.1 y`IDtL 'N5� ILLER raagmmagrm �� 'lypically, the City will als . rewire that all utilities be place underground � Ball Boulevard frontage. However, if this is along the h � Engineering found .to Le impractical in the 'Judgement of the plans, in : D,epartM.ent in the review of the detailed imp p a ica.nt may instead pay a fee in-lieu of undergr4 °s _Np y unding utilities along this frontage. Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings `shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approve d drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a r for final review and Profession�� Engineer, shall be .subaned�a any drawingFJ required approval (N , E: these plans are in addition by the Builtling Division and ; should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control y Plans . Technic i Guidance Handboo , November 1989 The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the gz;iidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times The first part is paid with any associated pub i c improvements which is for that Portion Of the development which li . es the impervious area within public right-Of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. 10. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing dre,inageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. 11. Storm drainage 0/.4tails shall be provided as part of tY'e public l,m}atoveYncnt plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm � °rat to the drainage basin service area shall be provided as a suppleme . _ ;l location abased can full. public a.mprc►ver�uent plans, Area. The .� ®� 11 be b , ^,apact;�� Of development of the existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 12. A grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and pro posed typical ' M floor elevation_ 611 each lot, inc.�.udin elevations at 4 different corner of the floc r : tied contours and i- � a,cal finished or plan t;i to the top of curb elevations as shown on the public: i'mi rovement plans. 13. The existing residence shall be sewer system. an appointment for , pre-construction 14. The applicant shall make Tigard Tig g p meeting with the City of ard tngineerin Department after royal of the ubli `up plans but before starting work on P' '�,�n �:ovemen.t ��:�l.ans a p p the ylicant' s engineer and contractor shall be require to an.t, d this g the site, The ad to attend t,�i�t mee'.l.ng prior to receiving the approved plans and permits. connected the public sanitary E VGINEThR1NG COP 4ENT. r w Construction of the proposed puablicf improvements shall not commence ugt:il after the Engineerinq Department has reviewed and approved tha pubs iC improvements plans, a strDet op nai.nc permit or constTyu tion compliance' agreetents has beet e5teouted, execution of a de ►�eloperr- engineer agreement and p yment of a.1.l permit fees. 16. Prior to the plat bei- aq recorded with Nashirlgtoz Comity the applicant chail provide a 100 percent Performance assurance or letter of 0mmitment . As an alter alive the applicant may have the plat recorded att r the puhl .c improvements have been %Accepted by the City of Tigard and has posted the appropriate Maintenance Bond. ?ricer to the recording of the Plat with Washin' rton County f the City of Ti hard will ensure the "street plug" is dea)idz ted to thr Public. The °street plug" is shown as Tract "C" on the Co"ioriy Creek Estates Plat which was recorded on Pagan 19 in Book 47 Record of Town `Plats of Washington County. T_O_ r T m • THIS G' OF THE FCLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE CO CMITY DE DEVELOPMENT CODE THIS AWARE NOT A XCLUSIVE LIST .. SEC '.i'ION' 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement A. Before Ci ty approval is certified on the fitlsl plat® and before a pproved construction p lans are issued by the City, the Subdivider shall.: fil e an ��c ' ecute and. j agreement with the City Engineer, �:. � specifying the per iod within 1.1ioh all required . improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2. - ;c ude in the agreement p ,, such work is 1 . completed within the • period spa ified if the City nab... raa�, comp p complete f•he work and ret‘over the full cost and expenses from the subdivider. Th(a r stipulate improvement - . M fees and deposits o as g paid y 'o provide for cement shall s �- _,. , . .. ;, ... '.:,t .. ... improvements anC� I�3 al stages' -�or '��12 +�a�r be required to be aid cane .ruction of the zci fec.,�d.itiun� there and extension of time under „ t sin stated in the contract 2. SECTION 1S160.80 Bond A. At required by Section 18.160, ith the agreement an assurance of the following �J 11 �An irre c able letter of nstitixUon ,a�ath sized to o Ore *gori; • 170, the subdivider shall ' f ile o performance opt • ii: by on credit e; eouted by a. -' f inano,Lal • transact business 1.n 'the •State.. N Tr BI 1 C�It+ NT p 3 9; ° 04 '1ALEY/ MILLER;. 4 A surety bond executed by a surety 'company authori e01.. to transact business it the. ,State Of Oregon :Which rem►air s in force until the surety , , oomp,ny is i Qtif 1, ?d by the 'City in writing that it melr be terminated; ca' . Cash. The subdivider shall furnish to the City Engineer an itenitzed inhpr4rement estimate, certified by a registered civil engineer, to assist the City ,Eng neer in calculating the amount of the Performance assurance. subdivider. shall not cause termination of C , The t nor allow expiration of said guarantee Without having first aecurad writtelit authorization from the City. SECTION 18.160.190 Filing and Recording A Within 60 days of the City review and approval, the applicant . shall submit the $'inal plat to the County fog s gnatures of County officials as required by ORS Chapter 92. R • Upon final recording with the County, the applicant shall ubmit to the City a mylar copy o the recorded final plat SECTION 16.162.:Y'O Final Plat Application Submission Requirements • Three copies of th e p aitition Plat pre ared b y a 'Rand survey or licensed to practice in 6regon, and necessary data. c.: narrative B: The ,partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the • minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. SECTION ,162 ,110 Centerline MonUmenta .� on: Monument Box Oe A. Centerline k °onumentation for all Major Partitions: 1. The ceritr cline of all street and roadway ric,iht s -of -way' shall be monumented As prescribed in ORS 92,060(2) before City acceptance of street improvements under tree, following specifications eexticatons s a. Centerline nonumerts are required to llaveAtionunent boxes conforming to City standards set for those monuments within the pavement area►; and The tops of all monument boxeS " shall be eet td finished pavement grade. 18.164.120 Utilities 1. Al utility.. lines i r`�citid`ng, but not limit ;d to those AZ. utility required for lei trw &k , comxiunication, lighting and cable ENGINEERING COMMENTS t SUB 93-04 FINLEY/MILLER levi services � `1ities shall be to side se�v�.�ces and related �.ac�. placw. d , tnderga und, except for surface mounted transformers, Qurface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed 'above ground, temporary utility service facilities, during constructions high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above,` 18.164.130 'Cash or Bond Required 1. All improvements installed by the subdivider shall be gUaranted, as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following acceptance by the City. 2. Such guarantee shall be secured by .cash deposit or bond in the amount of the , value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer n 3 The Cash or bond shall co rply With the terms and conditions of Section 18.160.180, 18.164 150 Installation: P? Pnt; isiteiPer: pit Fee 1. No land division impro'i,aments, including' sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken , exc xpt after the plans therefor have beer, approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued j:. 18.464 .180 Notice to City Revired 1. 'Mork shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance 2. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. `. 18.164.200 Engineer's Certification Required 1. land divider's engineer provide written certiFiatioa of a fo�n p ri provided by the C ry that all improvements, wo:kmansllp and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction' p acticea, and are of high grade; prior the City acceptance of the subdivision' e, irnproveMents or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. APPROVED L:247-*? /6'47/t Randall R. Woole. city Engineer co a 5u 113 -•O4 C 1C'► ►IN,�ING COiN'S' SUB 93 -0 FR1�Y %ZL 71� is MOs Tigard Planning Department DATE s lnkaxan 2 ry 123 (NPO 415) The a„ l .aaant r OSte Subdivision pra:eliWinas^y plat a,,+ provaaxl to divide as parcel of approximately 1.59 tierce. into Attie 3.0tS ranging between 9,000 and 11,050 hoquare 2av t in sisa e A Soli iL itive Landa approval is requested toallow ground d,isturbanco;i of approximately 30 to 35 cubic yards ! in a wetland. APPLICABLE MITI= : Community Development Cod. Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.8 'l, 18.92, 18.102 .1 18.108, 18.114, 1801G0, 18.160, 1, 4.2.1, 7.>1.2, and 18.164; a�'1a�1�Ca�'�naeanaefr��a� 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1„ and 8.1.3. LOCATION: 14010 SW Ha1;1. Boulevard i 281 1210, tax lot 200) BON R.4 (Residential, 7 urlita /a re) T17,5" same allow single family attached 7 or date/ailed r+esid ! ia1 unite, duplexes, _public support facilities, farming, aaaanufacture. homes, occupations, family day care, and accessory strivicturea awn other Uaae» attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement far your review. From lniOrmation supplied various departments and n g eneiee and from other 3ufo rvia iot available to our Staff, a report and M coe nendation will be prepared paered and a decision will be rendered cn the proposal in the near futures If ou WW1 t comment ova this application, we need your comments by 'Fel24124 19.9.1. You Wig, use the space provided below air attach a separate letter to return your consents. f g,g atae uxa a t, r .tom e ! ,,, please phone the staff contact . noted � l with consents and confirra your comments in writing as soon as p sibio. lf u have ay questions regarding thin m8tter/1 contact the Tigard Planning Department, Box 2339?, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STA ` ' CONTACT: PLBABS CRICK TM FOLLOWING XTSMS THAT p PLY g We have revs - wed the prop osal and have no cb j L tioi s to it. Pleaaaei contact :r..,. a f our waffle® Please refer to the enclosed letter. .. ., Written Comments: i ani...0s71.011+1111MOe... swr.W hi■listosou o. rewle∎ NAMe Of Perth ai CoMmentings Phone Number: l 1. i • o' ..4 4 t .!: ly ti rl..owreamarialrie ba..m+wiiiam • Z m S:W HALL s:s S O.t h- -CT'.. O co ITI rn BONITA FIRS 06 • CONDOMINIUMS AVE. 44, t,. Pliosiouresa 11 030 S A Kerr Play • Suite 375 take Oswego, Oregon 970354 228 50/2434068 c FAX 503/2454943 ..o i .brie.. ■w=2r urnammernmarimumramararivio ..1.1111111.1401111111i 'annary 13,1992 Mr. Tom Miller Mitite & Son, Jitn Route 3, Box 62 Sherwood, Egon 9.7140 RE: Preliminary Wetland Assessment on a proposed resident4 4! ision neat ► SW Colony Creek Drive in Tigard, Oregon (SRI Piplect #93009) Dear Mr. Miller: After having reviewed the scope of the project, the approximate wetland areas th d appear to be present, and t be. associated potential wetland imp we have tie following comments. The site vi .t was :co ducted on Imlay 11, 1993. 1. The small, well incis4d stream channel in the southr rn• paw of tl a project is, in our opinion, has season intermittent streamflow only Y and is also 'located "abov'e headwaters'. Wetland appears to be prasent , association with the stream chmai, but ..:. .. a 9r wetland .. ... feet in a .. ent �hln the project. a Width of �e�ad averages es about 2 iee The wed s found immediately at the base of the Wale and does not extend upsape more than 6- inches very' 1t Is clear that the sole TM functional, value of the wetland' law Chant ., ti a y vb ,.. aas been en�eroa t ire, and the { .��efi�ative dv�ainant, .. ap p prefo � ►' e ..,, s t o tor �e ti�dar "� ca +ss ie u., la it,.v by and et Ll limited wilds a value and does not ors a hart ' other *Tadao. d or habitat related fulictioitiso 4 '. the anttel �a pr lde eor re s and tnonlie r nee to �s ®,fie a im/Pe137 rr4 d1�R50.88 isle ruder of the see Pa ' the eidma ita , our r ..1 , r�� ,,a1an" o i;a . ,. � mop wills� 3 �th�c y�rdi� and almost comb*, �+oi 1 nit erased ed the state lets of 50 cutS/e This a on �� lbw a tit le �, � ." � �f 1Si� fe.�e� aka �et1 d . � �� fool *Us • • %:43..eV . „' SCIIEPWTIFIC RES:RACES IfrlGw Palms zpth i tlat will offeceaely an4) of 3.0 xkat. M the iuble ininimumi veil *Lot be az led, si permit 1 ceu 4 � domil preliminary information please .NN•..•NNKaP u ..NN.O.•..N...N A N.NN.NN : -; i . .f•i. - 2 E©UIREMBNI .....N.NN.NNN.N t.. t., .. I. IC ' • .K.fY . fsk • LOTS •NNN.NNN¢•N.•N.N a r -.V .; �.at _ *• .. .N. My. SOLAR: SLOG iNNN.•NN....... _�� ai -. • • • • • uN N - y -'INS LOTS. •.N•N N ;.s o__ .i. N•s- .ai • .MN){.....Hl NO.. ax6NIpT gO,3.'eaa•Qnaaeoewuaaa •• I......NNNGN.N.fM ._ �......^f ,. - -fit. a. • s • . • N�: • • • • . .' N.N...M.....NR.N.K:r . NNNE.iN....Nl.q. t}��_ L.a�lZil•1••• i..�.. r.F)CiNi` _ asset MM.. N.N. �� ''• -i iMgM , ._ � �..l.f _ - - PPP ■ ■■ 9,•••S oi...r. 11111111111111111110- f 9- a .r.1, IMICWINIUMNIMIWIL.19.1.10111•MWIR . ‘111111101.10,1121.11.0...,1141 -...4 �T. — ? .Oa &r... - witmoso•c■• . 111111111111111.111 ..�+ .. .NH...O.NN.O.t. .�:•NNN.1WM. .N.NN...NNN..: NG.).NN.Nai... N.N....1 ........ - - .11.0...........M. NiG]MN:IT.N.... 1N::: NN....K.N..w "•rwN.N!• ••••••............• ...... .••ND.!)NN... • ..Me.. a.•NN...NN •.N.)NNN..NNNlMN. -- •..NN.NN.NN.(..N..... WN.N ....t.l...N... Ft N•IN.NONN.N. NN.N.NNN./.NN.1l..N N.. .l^,M.NW►_: t..1).NNN./..ZN•Na:• NNNN•.N�. .N• ............. ..............• ...V..N.N. ..NINNN:N.....N.NN.N! ..NNO.a..• .1.1. .Y:N•.l.NKN.N.N Q.. 1.. .a....N •.•fNNN...... 3 .....Nn .N.W...Y.NN....).•.NNN. ...!.e .N :.NNM1.....t•v..: -N.N) •N..N.NNN....NNN•!.•. ......... .... N.a. .N...N.K2.NMNNi1: •N............... 9.NiCNt......NN!?..N. N......KNM 7W/ N021�Mlil.lD.E.`.OH............. M N.....a.gNN........ MNMMI.PYNM/N[N7...• _ „ 111111114111111111111111111111111111111- ' - •• amo ¢ca. _ _ -, .. ,... :... r�:. a a. • - . •rr•.•.•v.r• • INLIO•141••••••■••• •e•asti•erai II .s'ase•.r...1110•11.4.117..• . ��I ••1...•i•�•i0i-- N1HNN•.N..N. wow ma. •..•NSN ..)..N.•NN.i.N. •asoa��ro ii••.0•e•�• , •••■ri• .. - .. _: . _ - YC��O• ...N).. N . , NN1N•1N+"- NNN �).•NN.•.N. ••■1•1•■••••••••••¢•••■•=. .da•11,■••••OM11/1•O .•H••.1•. /i.00i.••N sf•rf••••a••••••+s. • . A�Qa . .. ••••! ........�N.N 4 '. ••••••••........ .....••• .N...NNNN.N!•N. ....M.. .- .11`•l.daid ••Ca.NNN•M.NN.N..MA• •N.N•1•G.tN1C)fa.M'.. •N iK.•. -- ..NNfa. • ..SINCNH••..:.N.N..N IQa4 .......... .N.•N... .N•CNl1N.N•. ems. f aJ•• ..N..N rime •. •.NaCY.tC.a .MOT). f. ••..i••SY•.o¢� •CN - _. _- • '••-•tlt -1..5 •i1•¢1L0i0O.R`s21•11•1sLIMM• s................: .............,,,.......• ••• *OP ••••11.116 WHIM Ms .∎••• NaN. -a• ... ••.NNi N.NN. N.. mama. - VG. NN•NN•S...N• -.. ••■0•L me.N.MIN...N...11eW .Nti:Y•.CG•.1.iNK1N)N. ••l Nf..N•NNb.NN.H••• 1NN ..I..NN.H. _. - -... .N._ ' ..NN.NONHS..W.. .•............M..... '.U.N..... NiO..)......NNNt..N............ .N..NN.N.)N....MN.•...N.{M•iNN .......ONIN.. - N f•..NNN.....NN..NN......N...... NNL1K..NCfI.N.. :•a.�s�. '. _ - _ " , . - ita.•eev ..asae .....: _- - n..r4.�•..e.1.1�w..w Vic» _ _._ .. ,�„� - - SUMp9l4 SUM iNnV: 1 DASIt i1FOUIIIEMEN't -z. :® Ai. 3YOF LOTS:e. :.. LO I-3 ML1Iwa • .. _ It SC A111401S . s LOIS :MEE:1 IRO; COLA. (1 SUILDINGLItIE'o _ WSMAR`LO I S . LOI USI NEI EXEMPT ION. LOTS EXE:RII'ED FOR CAUSE•. mQyT�+a�FCppasMy *, Dy�, aaNC_I L'1.. ..at chtl. se: PAM : arty /�1 s� {Mai $� •f/.� f . I ia=except aatmp :d' rust: mast` ..�.,... CIS ,.., p /y 1 under /� s /�q.,•1.1.11.,.�.•.. those a mple) ur de ¢.O %:1IMiempUcn tnndwd �N.N....NN.NN.N•......K.I.N .....NNNNi•iJN1NNN•N• setback requitement -1r Limy we•t chaos a lot; which is not ssoart30; .•N..NM•O..N•O.N.1N.. • .NN.N.^.e..IN.ON.Mff.N HNNNi• Mfi. G ..)i.IMM...i._.ii.CtJf.(gp.IN.• LEGIBILITY STRIP' COLONY CREEK WSTATES NO. 6 PROJECT OVERVXEW February 3, 1993 LOCATIONI1 The address of the project is 1.4010 S.W. Hall Blvd. being on the east side Of hall, opposite the intersection of S. T1. McDonald Streetg The north terminus of S.W. . Faaano Creek Drive is , *t the south boundary of the site and will provide development access. Ex.S rXNG SITE CONDITIONS,: The property is 1 shown on the Washington County Assessor ° s Tax iap 2S -1 -12 B as taar lot 200 The entire si,.e cont ►ins 2 m S3 acres of which 169 acres ua.1l be utilized in the development. The balance of the site containing g the existing bone will remain. The site ge nerally slopes from the west to the east at slop between 514 and 10 %o There is a wetland that has been identikled and reviewed by Scientific Resources Inc. eS.R.1..) as being a mi 1ir 1 wtt1and r This wetland does not fall. under the wetland I regLl;atory programs, please ref 3r to the S.R.I. letter of 3anuary 13, 1993. Existing try on the site consist of Fir, mar , Ash, 1. Oak h, Ade, , a and a few soatt! fruit tree The trees have been Zie1d located and arz shown on the preliminhy plat. The easterly portion of the site teldv elevation 139.60 feet is within the 100 year flood plain of Farao Creek. Existing utilities are available to serve the deve7,opne,.nt DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL: The proposal is to develop a single family lots and 1 duplex lot. S.W. F! CREEK DRIVE ! t 1., . be e r teln � as a public road to the al;: iYb . a�ta�re eactensl:o��a. l�tc�aat for north hoaanciary for £" A £easi,bl w■� _...,, ..... .. .:.. f this Y ♦ro � w . ! X Bl i►d is the �uta;t{e e�te.��e�n �iut��.s road ��d connection to 1�4a. ea shown on the p hi $ A PRIVATE DRIV ( i raot '9A`4) With a 'sideWnlk al � the sou tfi_ er y sid e will aerve the lots to the east ate well as provide access to the City dre way / oponspace. S.B. BLVD is a state highWaY, there frontage b curb and sidewalk Of taahr lot ... � ��.�r �11c ,.. 3�npr ® is c�,.taruct access the aat��e x00 i a may required. awe Fl 4111 SOL R ACCESS IS.provided to lots '.122 through 127 by t zir nnrt' - aouth i ' 1 � ,' it orientation w isY►�8 +r�'b 90 feet- dLAdul Ws r,.. 1/6 through 130 have north-south dimension of Ai feet and cannot meet the. o a " requ .r fltS due the basic configuration of the prop. rtyr auci the required 'extension Of 3.14. Valiu1t° Creek Drive caUsing the lots $'��raes�r the road as z t4On.' The color accede code provide i , 2 % exea.p ton of the 1` nUsher of ,acts in the dev eio t Which in this e would be (2) tuo lets. the ooA`e` elms ' Provides that it � a 5 inc In r`�114n eat cost or loss of .ding sites that tyre Shall al*o be ► s, 5X-would d unt to $43400O0 , ii' a lot w �n ' Eton �r o +PJloved there would 11% lS1Sa of apP' Dxiiiattely $32, 000 00. The plan as subuitted meets the solar accees Code SERVICES & UTILITIES: sAkITART SEWER.is available from the Kati. System and will be e em l��w.ded as Shown. P by a 8 -inch pz at the north end of WA's SUPPLY is tsu1�U1�.e� Panne' er the pro jest future : extension. �s3 �.,o sou 'or and 1 flood plain. *bawl wet l s ' . All sToRm DRAINAGE will be The minimal wetland will � graded and dill A soils work will. Oct doh under the direction tion of a sowm engiE r and will be tested to cssubre that it meets the st ndardA ,, All public and Private s of Vigard and the �lrZ� will- n atruoted o the City _ r o faenc3es standards,. Electrical rpower, t e-- p oL-, ura1 g. m. n . cab_ e television facilities are available to the tits. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST NPO Subdivision SUB 93 -0004 1 Sensitive Land Review SLR ' 93 -00 ®3 Applicant. Harris- HcMonagle Associates Land Diner: Edward Finley B.au+',_ gene ] ®catisin a The applicant requests Subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide 1.69 acres of a 2.53 ac `° site into 9 lots ranging in size from 5,000 to 11t850 square feet (approximately 0,76 acres will remain with the existing house). The applicant also requests a Sensitive Lands Review to allow the smr��.�. amount of fill does not require, a to wetland area. T�n�i� filling of approximately 30 cubic yards of q State of Oregon wetlands modification approval. This site is zoned R -7 which requires Lots to be a minimum of at least 5,000 square feet 'dacha This property is located at 14010 SW Hall Boulevard. Please review the attached development proposal and comment on those listed hich conce ) this NPO regarding this application. This listing is a to aid in your review of this � e Please let know � feel about thiii development taking P e � your � ort3 on � f �� city. Thank You. Access To and From Site Traffic Impact X. Neighborhood Impact Envriroaitttmental IMpadt Qe 143 -go c�to �Jtac .;� t -tear Ae r .� tad s tce, i�k t 0-4,6 'I,(.c %, tL C (- f'c� ace c Ls hJ'�.�u `. E ' VV44 G k vl. ` ..._C.CJ w - yee ` 3 '4 Y ,C r '! li >€, txdi, lt, 4..4 V e$ 61 (1( .....,..._ „. Iw- £ ,.., c ��'ut�t?�I►'! Y5�1. G`� s CQ ed`�- ti.�I"CA,t�' ,�'�,4 C' % �t.� L',�, <'�" tl' 54,60,0 46 (,ac fuck C 6( 6/14 C`- .(CS,.5 ► C 6-€ S ltd 0A-44tc1 41 Po.. ____ t $ /cctt; iU s Signed: Dade c. S a'ff au C ' c Ron 1. ont�, -� �.. - ®mn0=y; bssia:tarit Pt�6�3„4 1' 1 +.. q' • PROM Tigard Planning Department PUMA- FEB 231993 DATE: Feh•ruuaa: -- 9 1993 RE: A5)Sotj � � O jii aF � ? �5y The applicant �bdiaa®r nrel�ainsry play g to p�*'1 �1 of appro��e1P 9 aorea into nit lots ran in between 11,850 „ ""' y approval is r � quee ed to Iow a g o disturbance of approximately 30 - to 35 is yards 3..gt Chapters wetland. APr «.,[ LE REVIEW TE�Ag Ccimuity Development Code 160, and 18.164 r Comprehoneiva Plan PFliciee 2.1.1 18... , 7.152, 18.52, 3S.84, 18.08e 10.92 10.202 16.105 ]�8. 4.2..L, 7.1x2, 7.3.1, 7 2 4.4, 8.1. ;, , and , 8.1.3. ToOrATXO! : 140.10 SW Hall Boulevard (worm -251 12E18N tax 0�g a units/acre) 1-9 cone allcnv� single �a�1 attached or detached residential u nitsduplex e, public support facilities, faoi faoturod a, , occupations, falsity day care, and aC�Elsoky at Ctu ®is among other u®ae® attach is the Site Plan and applicant's etat n1 for your r i�w Prom Supplied by variow � dep rtpeente infavmation and agencies and from other r eoon n iat ion will be prepared and decision will be � ,�. ndered on the proposal in the neat future. If you wish to cant on this application, we need your ,.~ onx �use the spat provided below or attach 1� n ! your o ta. arr unable v e i taees � `,g letter lease phone the staff contact note belrAt with your co nta + d r oyafirm yz,ur comments Ira writing as soon au possible. If you h &ve any questions r ai din 3 this � atter , contact the Tig a,d Planning Ve partmen,o PO Box 233:7- 13125 SW Hall TA Q �� 8 97223. C�� . 639"/iq6 0 - -. STAN!° CONTACT Dwi. 7?mnzcotr.. . 14 r CM= TUB FOLLOWING ITEM THAT APPLY: We have r eviewar1 the .. . .o.m.,_ pr�apa��al and have no objections to it. Please contact of our of fide. Please refer to the es losed letter° ' Written OoMTiNesntB S ,� ,.&,,, ., . .Ka titt! . (...1441 ..,.._..k,,?1,,,illt Th ts. ir6 et/ :,:q4..tv. .41,S . ,, ,:e. ifiA ICII__'14,1_,,?4,ci,-.., c:;:!, ' .;:i -..ittitti ,a 4'c'e." • twe CV , S t4 A ~ ''S/044: . c ,c 5 PL) cu t �m 41.0■411.0101•MOSIMMOINO 11,11,1=1161.1W oyy , y, A sit NAMe Of Peron Coa entinl, ° Phone DUMber: K i 4 Man I `fir `DA : dROSis s Tigard Planning Depataent qy �( i,��.t�n► preliminary tat � MY ( ., applicant e' is Sa p room& to ( ► #5) The , of 69 acres into nine lot ranging between divide �► Gael �� a�p�raaxisnaa�te'l�w 1. 5,000 and 11,850 Be are f et in size. A $ans tive Lands as ,pproval requested d to a+110w a ground di. ,turbanae of approximat .a, iy 30 to 35 cnbic yar s in ` a We land. APPLICABLE REVIEW : Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18 34, 18. sag 18.929 18.102, 18.105, 18.114, 18.150, x6t.1., and 81..3. , LO M XON. 14010 SW 1, 4e 2 va 7.1.2, .6®, d :.8 164; Comprehensive Plan �Policieaan 2.1.1 &r lev►a��rd �W0 7.3.1, 7x .44.4, 8.1.1, 281 12i11I9 tax lot 200) ZOO$ R -7 (Residential, 7 annnitt /aa re) The R-,7 z®4t allows 1 nng1e family attached or detached r s dential unit e, duplexes: public support facilities, f fug, manufaRtn;ed homes, home eoou tiona9 family day a.ree and ac:eds®ny ., .rtct ree among ether; uew, n Attached is the Site Plan and app,4.Loa nt a g astate ent for your review. P,�r information 1. supplied by various �1'. ff, �W� department LO�{i� recommendation agencies i6�GJ��ii1 W��f+ ��"�'N+O�Nb and frame, information, av►aaale t , and a decisicvA will be r c Bred on the proposal in the near future If you wish to comment on thin app3.1caaation, we need your comments by Feb. 19, 1991, You may ua ,: tine apace provided ho1ow or attach a separate 7,, ,.-*.ter to return your downents. , „o e a a ►le to rportoncia iei r p1,: use phone :h Staff contact below wit h your comments and coniltm your comments in writing aiti soon aS any tiorna rsa I din this matter:, contact the Tigard Planning De a '�, eat a P4 Bo= 2335 Tigard, 97223. PEO , �ni�al�d I� �aa ina�re an ee 7 a► 13125 SW �Ia�l.l. Blvd., '993 'P CoNTACTt �pvq�emnwtaW PLEASE Cam= '.t HE FOLLOWING ITEMS T PLY: We :170Ave reviewed th proposal and have no obj = 'etiona to it Please contact ... .�, of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments ow., • Los rat ,o.mor ca ar�n s ..:......ours. .. .. �, uerrsw„®, me Li,: .1 ,:eansinfswearr,sisamemereWl■ ti Me of p rgon Commenting: Michael Miller, Engineering Tech. III ∎ RECEIVED p NNING FO 1013114TS i61 Dm: 9 1.993 'MOM Tigard Planning ng D.: psrtment B31 s i -!' : V'Fs • .,N sus .-000 g ralt L- m0 R *5) e$bdi ri on plat approval to d div a_ parcel. of spproxit 1y 1.69 acres into gain° data ranging betty' en 5,000 egad 11, 850 ® e fe:r.t in size. T Sen&.tive Lando kzpproval is .. round dis t b€ nce o a rox te1y 30 to 35 cu aic yards in a wetland. P:II IEW : nib Dewe1 t requested to Alm: a 9 Code Chapters 18452 le' 1140 18.83, 18.92, 18.102 , 18.108, 18.114, 18.1500 ��q9 8�pp mq 0p�► 8p 164; Comprehensive �ggPlan Po1�i/ci tit .1.1y , 4.2.1, 7.1.2 7.3.1, .148 fir': 4. 4, D 4 �j sTX0 : ...14010 Ua1.1 '�oe�is le and (WO -.. 7.�'0�® 70�4:Yf, 8.1.1, and �.�.ilo�4 2s1 1231,_ tic lot 200) Zia R-7 (Residential, 7 un ` z) re) The R-7 zone rr<aingYe family attached or detached residential units, e uplenes, public support faci1Lti ®B, farming, Lng, anuf uzed homes, i omn pationa, family day care, and accessory structures amOng other aaee6. Attached Lb the Site Playa and applicant s stater - Ar y review. a4'r information Supplied by, carious departrtaenta and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and reconu®ud&: i.on will be prepared and a deeaie L n 'will, be renda re d on the proposal p oaal in WI near feature. If you wish to cont on this application, We need bur co .onente by Fejag ]. 0 1921. You may use the space ;provided be iow or attach a iseparelte letter to return p ur cotagents. *>J►co�x uxami le e� x ®® rid,.. C h : ' please phone the a 4aff contact netted below with your cetme nt% ,and confirm your corments in W,riting as soon as �ueetion€ regarding g this matter, Contact the Tic e �Ik�ibl,e 4 1� you have any � Planning Oeparteent, P® Sox 23391, 13125 SW Ball Blvd., Tigard, OR 91223. PROM* 619-4171. STAFF CONTACT: R ►n Pomere PLEASE CHECK TEE t?0 LOWING ITEMS 5 ". ZT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. w Please contact a, of oery. office. Please refer to the icl ®o6d letter. ie Written Comments: 1101.6. 44ftweroor ..... -..... - a9Y.\nv.....w■■■••msea Yk lam liainesosiowoosasee _.. - -.--------------'------------- "'44401 lisimemYi alimrocrommoti.esioisilmoo . 4.4ameiricescm. Mom 1� Name of Person Commenting: IPL2 lll1..., phone Number e r. 44'; 11 Ti ard4 ualatin r' it e School District 23,7 ra ai f, is tarry Hibbard Administration Center 13137 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, oregoa 97223 Tel. (503) 620 -1,626 Fax (503) 684.2296 City of Tigard. Ron Pomeroy /Planning Department P.O. Box 23597 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Pomeroy: In response to your request for comments on the development called Colony Creek Estates No. 6 (93 -0004) located just East of Hall and North of Colony Creek Ct. the attached is submitted as statement of impact. Sincerely, '_�N.'_ a fs �� y, �, 1;;� � ,': tr., c�; •r 'qY� ■� TICiRRD—TURLRTIN SCHOOL DISTRICT CITYZEOUNTY RESIDENTIRL IMPRET STRTEMENT Colony Creek Estates Nob' Single- 9 Multi: Family 0 [ 21 (:3' -1 92/93 Actual Available Enrollment Capacity Intesrediate (Fowler Jr High) 411 E 89 775 i 125- ESTIMATED AT Adlusted l Capacity Requirement (Sum of co'urnns 2,4 &5 i 6 1500 -3 °5 70 l j Sep-93 For explanation of columns 1 through 6, see code on back sheet Status of School Impact H-A. " School(s) capacity not exceeded (column 6 less than column 1) School(s) capacity exceeded -- core: facilities- are sufficient to consider:. portable additions Sufficiency determined by requirements of Uniform Building Code and/or City County codes. School(s) capacity exceeded- -core facilities insufficient to consider portable additions. Additional capacity may be provided by other options under: consideration by the School District which inclvle: grade level reconfiguration, rescheduled school year, boundary adjustments, double shifting, busing to under-utilized facilities, future bond measures leading to new construction, and other housing options. These options and statements have been prepared by Tigard - Tualatin School District Administration Staff and approved by the Board of Directors. This school impact statement is for the q ev indicated development, and is valid for 120 dais. Signed , Bud Hillman Director of Operations and Transportation (684-2221') IMPACT STATEMENT CODE Column School capacity reflects the number of classrooms, porgies on site and Special Education program accornodafirns; at an individu2l; school. Column 2 Actual current school enrLlment- kindergarten has been computed at one -halt. Cotumni 3 Current available capacity- difference of column, 1 and column 2. Column 4 Impact of previously` appmved develop-milts deter mined by School District housing formula (see School Dir,tr ct Horsing Formula shown below) Column 5 Impact: of reiluested development Deterr i led by School District: housing formula. Column 6 Adjusted school capacity requirement: determined by the sum of columns 2,4 and 5 and places developmental request in A„ B or C category. SCHOOL DISTRICT HOUSING FOULA 0.46' Pre -first grade children '„er dwelling 0..37' Elementary students per dwelling 0.12 Intermediate students per dwelling' 0.08 High school: students per dwelling 0.57' Total school age students per dwelling Multiple - Family Dwellingg Elementary students per dweihng Intermediate students per dwelling High sc4!ool students per dwtell:n Total school age students per dwelling ;SCHOOL. DESIGN' CAPACITY CURRENT ENROLLMENT AS OF 1/29/93 Tigard High School 1465 1 571 Tualatin High School 1465 984 Fowler Middle School 900 775 HazelbrooK Middle Sch. 800 719 Twality Middie School 900 768 CFT Elem. 570 49 6 Mary Woodward Elem. 600 65-5 Durham Elea, 425 394 Templeton Elem 550 555 Metzger Elem. 550 492 Phij Lewis Elem. 500 411 Byron Elem. 610 586 Tualatin Elam. 600 565 Bridgeport. Elem. 600 599 TOTAL 10525 9580 LEGIBILITY Y STRIP CREE Ea A V`E._ AVE. ' ® e 1 rrt EIONITA FI Rs 3AleiO ., )'VILLAGE. CONDOMINIUMS VIM a Tigard Planning Department yS ,) ,,, a 3.°0004 r , TIV 7-s ..NOS ,,. �3i- 1�'!►...,,..�.. ' :p a (NPO " ") The appl.fcaft requests Subdivi. ion preliminary y plat approval to divide a pare =1 of a pprotimatoly 1.69 .cre into xd e' lots ranging a a�. between en 5,000 and 11,850 square feet in size« requeEsted to &lime a ground disturbance or appro iv ately 30 to 35 cable a �� 18.1028 ' 18.108, 18.114, �,� Development '. Cod yards in a wetland. APPLICABLE � F it ITERI � i D la � chapQ: ®g°® �� a w`AC9 .�.� m �QI p �.88� 1 Plan lP'ol.ici.d�s� �. � �. s .Er � 4.2.1, 7. �.50 18.160, and 18.1,34; preach .s7.1.2, 73.1, 7.4.4, 8.1 « 1, end 8.1.3. LOCATION: 14010 Sri Ball Boulevard (WGT2 1$1�R2tax lot 200) SO NE: R-7 (Residential, 7 �nit� ire' The R-7 rod a7l o s in le family attached detached residential unit3, duplexes, public support facilities, farming, nannuf ctur 3d homes, bcoupat$oae; fRa ��; d�� care„ and acce =so` structures among o�h�Au h e e. Attache? th Site Plan pP l c a nt ° s statement for your review. Prom inform tion supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information av,- Liable to our etaft, a. report and reco aeedaticn will be prepamdl ® the proposal in the near future. If you wish to cement on this application, we need your cc n® et.e by Feb. , 1993. You may us rd the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return the c e te. 1.® respond h� �e d please phone t f (suntact , 'arat ar� ��a� - ,�.o.. -x you any . _ questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard noted below with your cements .ate confirm your comments in writing as noon a s�ai�l,e. If yin � Planning Department, P.O 'Sox V397, 13125 SW Ball Blvd., Tigard OP 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. 5TAP' TACT: Nb p.m no FOLLOWING / EMS TEAT A PPLL: W O h .ve reviewed the propocaal and have no ob jectiOne to tit . Pleasecont ct r ionieripinsorgrommorromonorrowissrmirrearrigavveromienorresor of our of fc. Please refer to the eucloeed; letter. Written Comments: Damns of Person Commenting: Phone Number e .....4700‘42 s Mgr, FO S worrimigamOrm DATE: .. 11_131.0.13 , .1993 i� rr .s. r� `rnrc+rire�rwwn�.�s Tigard Planning Dri art zest RE: S' S N SUB 9 .' -000 + , .t .; NSIT8' ► .g T.. 93 id T3 XL WI (NPO 05) The applicant re vests Subdivision preliminary plat ap rov , to divide a pare :94 of approximately 1.69 as: ree t sto nine lotcF1 ranging between 5,000 and 11,C50 a3 tare feet in ass. A Sensitive Lames awn .oval requested ueata A to allow a ground disturbance of ap rcxi ately 30 to 15 cubic yards in wetland. APPLICABLE RMICtl CRITERIA: Ccomunity Development s Code Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.88, 18.33, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114* 18.154, 1 1.160, and 18.164; Comprehensiv H Plap:, Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.102* 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 6.1.3. LOCATION: 14010 SW Hall Boulevard VMaTH 281 12.E , tax lot 200) ZONE: R -7 (Rapid ential, 7 ita/a m) The R-7 sone allows single family attazhed obr drita.ched residential units, dupaek, e, public support facilities, farming, manufactured homes, home occupations, family day care, and aacceuuoryr structur ' -u among other dales. attached is the bite plan and applicant's tatament for your review. From information uppli d by various departments as d agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and reComendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in th near future If you 'Wish to comment on this application, we need your consents by 1232324.1_1.9, 1993. You :nay u®+ the cipame provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. uses awe a p,ab a to Oren ttnd %r_ t1� c e ria�tteM please phone the staff contact noted b p leR f you your confirm ding this matter, contact thew�T �n as l"lanaing Department* P® Box 23397, 13125 L 1 B _.. /1 Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHO 639 - 4/71. STAFF COMMA': n . Pomeroy nalasis CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS TEAT APPLY: We have revievied the proposal l a and have no Objection to it. Please contact „�. of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ciudAmmooimpromm Written Comments: ‘ a, i.i : oi Name of Person Commenting: _ 'C_ . t �'�-G. e L �.... ' �. Phone Na Oa o 4:0r Gil taanneammosikassurnmezzonfragowean bbx 4 RECEIVED PLANNING 1 1993 METROPOLITAN AREA FEB 1 Q 1904) DAB !� a ivaalyd #! 1 r�� COMMISSION PROM , Tigard leaning ' be:rtnt ...+�.+..�T.�i i ild@J og �d+�..0 wat 93.0at sJ.weX`IyA4INr,' applicant di e a arc f ap ray„ i t requests y 1..691 acres into nine � lots ranging between 5,000 and 11,850 equate f. t in' Bite. , A Sea *; itiee Lands approval is raw sited to allow a ground disturbance of +a proxit a tely 30 to 35 aubie yards in a teetland. cod Chapters 18 .52, 16 �� 8, �.8 � CRITERIA: i8.10Ban10.114, e�nt .150, 18. 160 aad 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 21.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 743.10 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3c LOCATION: 14010 ,°3W 11 Eknitlevard (WTI 281 1218B, tax lot 200) ZONE: Rey (Raw+eident ial, 7 unitse /aaore) The R.7 one allows single family attach d or detached residential unite, duplexes, public support facilities, farming, Maanufactura d homes, 11 occupations, family day aware, and accede or'y EitrUCtUVeili among 'other us s attached is the Site Plan and app1Loa n r ° ss statement for your review. From information supplied by various ous dep -tmentss and agencies ad from other information available to our _etaf , a report and recommend tion will be prepared red and rendered on the ` proposal in the near future. If you wish te co. sa�t on this application, we need your comments by Few, 199. YOU may utle the spac provided below or attach a t'epa rate letter to return your cummente. em ejnakl.a to r rejimeellyx_til_ghmg cat e please phone the staff contact r comments in writing as scan an noted below with your comments and confirm your possible. If you have any questions regarding thi matter, contact the Tigard g Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. ?DONEE Planning Department, Box 23�9i d 13125 �6� Na�l�: �l 639-4172. S APP CONTACT: Ron Pomero PLEASE onsex, THE FOLLOWING 'TENS THAT APPLY: proposal objections to it. �9e have re�iet��red the ro ac►�a�.A �a� have no o&s Please contact of our office. Please refer to th enclosed latter. written ComMent =; Nil am, WIIIMIMMOOMPI Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: (,(107V-6,11514 liwommOJImmorsolm,441mommoft '. .. vwrinm .V/MsNIow- �.aIONIIMsr.11o.w 0 lommemaream 8 "tea t DA: ISM: 'Tigard Planning Department. ilatanSISL _3004 SE_V_SMUE_MADS_JAR,,_92=e2V„L., 7/02 (WO #5) cal applicant seats Sta ivi ion prel�imir ,Iry plat ap r vel t divide P a pproxima tel y .i 69 acr into nine lots ranging betweet) S e 000 and 11,850 square feet in size. likt Sensitive Lands approval is requested to Et110r a ground disturbance of approximately 30 to 35 ctibic yards 112 a wetland. APPLICABLE ' 'a ' .18.92, CRITERIA: Community Development nt Cole Chapter' 18 62, 16. �4, 1P .�� d 102 15.105, 15.119 � 15. 1e0 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehensive plan P0lir ies 2.1.1d 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.11, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 6.1.3. IOCATION: 14010 S Hall Boulevard Meta 2S1 128B, tax lot 200) 7.00E1 (1'Res flen9 ia.1, `j a /acre) The B®7 one allows a single family attaaehqd or detached risidentla1 units, du 1eme. , public support ci ga ufActwed his, home occupations, y day - eegym? u ct ims® among other iaa en. Attacka d Is the Site Plan and applicant's statemeut for yomr review. From (ors Lion supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation I 1 be prOpared and a decision will be rendered on the the near future). ya wish we comment application, o went ® by 19, 1993. u h use apace) provided below or attach �epaxale letter to 1 our ccosnante. nab e t roe • nd the ab �v�a dates. please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments -a nd confirm vane omaents LT, writing as 1 ` oon ; s ®s3 t .e. If you have any questions regarding ding this matter, contact the Ti g �n.d P3,a lining Department, PO Or-$x 23397, 13129 SW Hall lvdh , Tigard, OR 97223. P olt 639-.4171. f)g)fi R —4/L*st-- b;' 9 w t3 .e.n.Y, ST 'P CONTACT: Ron PUgASN CHECK 'Tun POLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: .. .. We have reviewed the! proposal and have no objections to it. Please coma... p ct of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. w Written Comments: +f •• /.,/"4„ LtP) e . 0 ' iwlM OIwisorarswos'1+e1saatlmmeneowR1 Namme are Person Commenting: Phone Number: ! ^�f ABM Lid r PROW Tiger Planning Department • DATZs �1Sl�l� l�3`+Ca�! 3�.a�bpc $� $ S 93�f�� ',_.,,1UI. fl►iiD��, (8Wo 16) The applicant requeats Subdivision, vision preliminary y plat approval °,dl divide a p►arcel of approximately 1.69 acres into nine Iota r icigiara betweeN 5,000 and 11,850 square feet in size. Sensitive lands approval requested to all ow a ground di turbance pproxiMati„,iy ,Ly 30 to 35 cubic c ya t:de in a wetland. APPLICABLE XEW CRITERIAs Community Devei,opment Code C11,-nters 18.62, L84, 19.88, 18.92,E 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 18.160, and 18. 164 Comprehensive ' Plan Policies 2.161, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: 14 1110 SW, ball $ou1ev(trd (WCTM 281 12BE, tax lot 200) ZONE: R -7 (Residential, 7 unite/acre) T fl.7 sone allow single fa l y ttached or detached residential units, duplexes, public support facilities, farmingt, manufactured homes, home cc uupat .on , family day care, and a ceeasory atse:uctu;res among other uses. Attached is the SLtse Plan and applicant's etate iQz for your review. From information supplied departments and agencies �d from anther informaa t L0 acv Liable e by staff, a report and recomendation will prepared as.� and a decisik,: will be r , nd w <red on the pro postal in the near future. Xf you wish to cesehent ern tai.' 1 application, a, we need your convents by Peb. , 1993. You may use the space Gras yll led below or :attach a separat- letter to return your cements. e maa le ts c a nd r h above date please phorae the staff cont at noted below wit', your ante • and confirm your comments in writing as soon a r; sseibl.e. If you have any questions regarding this ma.tter, coat et the Tigard 'la ninng Department, PO Boa 23397, 13125 SW Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 6U-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Ron,Pomero a..•....., .. PLEASE CHUCK THE FoLLowanG ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the prOposal as nd have no objections to it. l Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: 1 1,061 Name of Person C cam®atin g m 1,;:, a w° Phone Number W.w..ivws . DATE: 'e ru 1 1919 PROW ' ' .4a vd Planning Department lt71 1 LIT LO SaDlL3 91 =®01.99. S , TInJ 1' . 5,1 - ® ,01 (IMO s 5')► T applicant sea sieests Subdivision vise► n p�r.t,lia plat approval tai divid aye, parcel of approximately 1.69 acres brag) nine lot ranging between ,5,000 and 11, 8'asve squaw feet in SLUG. A ; Sensitiv Lands approval is requested to allow a ground disturbance of approzisaat ly 30 to 35 cubic yards in a wetland. APPLICABLE BEVIEW CUTER/A: Comunaltr ll'avolopment Q Chapters 18.52, 18o4, 18.886 18.92, 18.102 9 18.1D8, 180114, 18.150, 18. 160, and 18.1641 Comprehensive Plan Policies 2. x.4.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7x3.1® 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: 14010 611 B8111 Boulevard (W 2$1 12P1 , tax lot 200) ZONE: (Residential, 7 unite) /acre) The 1..7 soma allows single family a ttached or detached residential units, duplexes, , public susrport facilities, farming, manufactured home =, home day accessary structures among other tui sa. occupations, family a cage® and a��eeSSS� s�tz�ss�tu Attached is the Site Plan and applicant is atatea ent for your review. From information supplied by various departraonta a ne">i agencies and fli'ttr.r. other infOrmation av ,. liable to our staff, a report and recommendatitan will be •drepared and a d s c . i�en will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. g °' You wish to c.. , acne, /an tbisa application, wq need your comments by Veb. 19, 1993. You slay aL CE2 the apaCtes provide4 below or attach a separate letter tc return your camente. ,11,..yol_Lunoble to a :cored . .the, a ate P3.ea s e phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your Comments in writing as aeon ae possible. Y �� Y questions l din 1 thie matter, cant t the Tigard Planning D r akme»ti � x 53397 1312 SW Ball Tigard, OR 97223. PEfOICIg 639-4171. STAFF Ca s Rama Pa>meway:, 89`; =CZ TH2 FOLLOWING ITEM THU APPLY We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. P1 aEe contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Commentsg oleriiiiiiminwesemoiamma of our offi.c -° - Itase�r..ar�:6waei..nu.uvoh � v1R 1 w.rl'i.r�rwa'sr�•es A 1IsAOSiBYbYwI.1ssIamMew1 FEW 41i+s / ✓.ice Name of Person comoentingg PhOue Numbers r......N . x — ci NA ;,j w S CIATES, INC ,, LE1 ENCINEERS-SURVEYORS 1555 S.W. HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 - -6287. PHONE (503) 639 -3453 GENTLEMEN: WE ARE WINDING YOU 0 Attached C Linder separate cover via C,` Shop drawings 0 Prints, 0 Plans El Copy of letter 0 Change order NO. OESCROMON 1etC. �,,� �,�� 04/6 r s dam: y`� � `�! J �!' �. _ G ;+•.�. -''Y 4I'1�EW1 � �r' � YY}}Taa**,111..'oi��""�..rr�.0 ...�. the following items: Samples 0 Sperafications THESE ►=ARE TRANSM'if"iED- checked beiow .7,--' or eppr ,0- 0 Approved as submitted Resubmit. copies for approval for distribution „- or your �'' 0 Approved as noted Submit � copies 5r- ed 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints .� For review and comment 0 _.. .. - . r 0 FOR AIDS DUE 19 __ E, PRINTS RETURK , AFTER LOAN TO US ,0*...4.F:--* '-''., .■2.-"#'..:.-14-e--e--.).d...,,l'7,- ..,..zi_.,11'°.-1,0e1Pe—,....1. ,401-Prg:-0:t"" REMA Ft) VIEW Ct • 4-..-- \\.).)........),-- ,.. 4••10..g., S.trit 4 he .•;,3ed. ot S ANN° °CO • SoNitA ViLLASE cOhlinfitiNstiks LEGIBILITY STRIP` ,n 89th AVE &W. S'W: S.W. Ct. • 83rd CT. AVE AVE .4V! L AGE CONDOM NR'I MS`. a ®le it fla Rasouroleng 111330 5.W, Kerr Parkway a Sete 375 • Lake O3wego 0r'641011 97035.1 228 January 13, 1992 Mr: Tom Miller Miller It Sons, Inc. Route 5, Boy: 62 Sherwood, Oregon, !'140 503/245.4068 FAX 503/24507943 RE: Preliminary Wetland Assessment on a proposed residential subdivision near SW Colony Creek Drive in Tigard, Oregon (SRI Project #93009) Dear Mr. Miller After having reviewed the scope of the project, the approximate wetland areas that appez to be present, and the associated potential wetland impacts we have the following comments. The site visit was conducted on January 1.1.0 1993. The small, ♦iel. incised , 1 Idtrea� ct� ®1 the southern part of the pro�eet is, p' has only and is also located in our opinion, a�` seasonal intermittent streaa�v� opal "above headwater?. d tlppears to be present association with the stream channel, but Wetland ., the width of wetland averages about 2 feet in the segment within, the project. The wetland found immediately at the base of the Swale and does not extend !oslope More than 6- inches The fuiactional value of the wetland is very low. It is clear that the sole vegetative dominant„ blackbem` . has been encroaching into and over the channel for some. . f i e. This species is u land' referrin extremely P. p Invasive, yet has limited value d does not o ft ; f fe.: other wetland or habitat x; elate d functions. the chancel to provide for reasonable access and e Your need, to economic ... eels p� bee v�nthin the wetland use c�f�v�o' remainder _... �.9�' t�® property seems _ � .. � tt� re o ro a a The estimate: impacts, ',led on w l rely .._ n .: . at exceed ed � t to 3� cubic ..y- a ril.. s aud will almost certainly not t i ,-ceed the minimum state of yatd�a This estimate is fed o± a total fill len0 of 150 feet, an avera ge wetland m►idth of 2.0 feet and a fill 13: 22 `SCI ENT it PI C RECCES' I depth ( t h a t , 11 e o ate wet a ar M 41' d a 1 not be exceeded is no state '; r t 1a necessary. If you xequire addition preliminary infixitrAtion, please call me - H�., iC O- :-- � el•CK� IOT e . N /REQUIREMENT L le �• •• Y• LOTS — L_ — SiiAEi Sf nr:LINE ••- eN•2!••H.Nf••i• • /•e•fHN•H•HtHCNp•••• ! �'�� + •3' LOTS stq /f NTAT1 N NI • 20• flNELeMpp ••®N•q »eNNfN•N »Wa 9� a EEXEMPT , r o. ws ►�9E . o1 ..L. E ... oJ,.& lNNNN aNN ••yNWN• •w- ••••••• .•. .. - - -t •I•ei N� 0•.6flWINfY»i I •f•J•.iaN••f!H N/f.tIVHN• WN B Nf ,......-- Yf> NN/ /NfNNNNNf / »1NtNNf /NfilYaliNNNN f.. ,f «. »2� ... • eWtN• itNl N fgNNf•f•NelNNN•q /WfW1Cf•N /■ •W W1WIfNH•NlW1NNN .- 1111111111.11100.111001111111111111 2.5' 9S Lis : T c.- / .--Al % �iff5� _ y - iNH•K•N • - •ONONHNee>• ! •! f • O• NSNHMNN•• /II••fIN•NfeWN•NteMC> • , •1M']f2 • W ON• KeCaf••HNN[•Kf !•• •Meet••••••• »•H•N••••N•N•N• NN•N•••a••WNN.gH•No•e ■ iN N Ei1 INfINN1NQYlfW M^ltfY /fWfNfINNW>NNINN •».N•1Nigf.• ••••NN■ ••NNNN NN•N••N•WW•••IWNi••x »NINN•••NKN IIMIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPIIIIIII -, . _ i•i 11111111111110 = •!•N�irs� >.Y,IYr•N, i4' •' •••N•••N•N •N•N•N•HNM•e•f ••••••.1.1•••••••••• Nq•NH•H••• ••• “•MIN•! ••■•••••••• NNN•NN N•NN•!N•NHH.NeIaN• •••••••••••• - ••••■••• • . ' 1111111111111M1=°0."1111111111001111111 . : lialli . . .. . S_ !MARY: LOTS:ME •E EIINaBASIC REQUIREMENT b LOTS MEEIING S R BU1LDlN � UNE n --�- # SOLARtOTS • ,d... ....� hoUSli 6-21% XEMPION m s �.w .•_.. >•....-- - OALO LtiiS'Eitl.MP1Et? F0?i C/titlSE • i �,�.. . .N for all lots except --........o..8 S aanQt•EFFR!!it! .those exam tad under 20396 exemption p tM•NNN - tgtNN•e • •i•N•N ®eutiA�}1et�t if then would si:rfldmd ... l !Nt•ie•NN•t•W N•efN•HJ. •NW .......... •s•.N.N... - ,shrill© aiot wtuch is ant -summed _ ~,iu z,li ....1 attached • NM • •!•ai••f N•iN• . , .. •NW ..•NN..N. NNN e•NN••N•• _ _... t •° {Even .t to art ctt ara J rn COLONY CREEK ESTATES NO 6 PROJECT OVERVIEW February 3, 199: LOCATION: The address of the project is 14010 S.W. Halo. Blvd. being on the east side of Hall opposite the intersection of S.W. McDonald Street. The north terminus of S.W. Fanno Creek Drives; is at the South boundary of the site and will provide development eeeess. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The property iG,,, shoran on the Washington County Assessor's Tax Nap 2S- 1 _ r 128B as tax lot, 200. The entire site contains 2.53 acres of which 1.69 are will be utilized in the development. The balance of the sit containing the existing hone will remain. The site generally slopes from the west to the east at slaves between 5% and 1,0%. There is a wetland that has been identified and reviewed by Scientific Resources Inc (S . i ,1,) as being a minimal wetland, , This wetland does not fall under the wetland regulatory programs, please refer to the S.R.I. latter of January 13, 1993 ?'¢xisting trees on the site consist of Fir, Cedar, Ash, Alder, Oak and a few scattered fruit trees The tree, have been field located and are shoes,, on the preliminary plat The easterly portior of the site below elevation 139.50 feet is within the 100 year flood plain of Fenno Creek. Pl ;ist ng 9 t .lit es are available to serve the development DEJELOF?4I T PROPOSAL: The proposal es to develop 8 single family lots and 1 duplex lot. will be DRIVE S.W. FA�fNO CREEK as a Public road to the north boundary for future tens�.on. A feasible alignment for the future extension n o£ this road end c onnection to Bala: Blvd. is as shown on the preliminary plat A PRIVATE DRIVE ( Tract "A..) with a sidewalk , along the soi therly ide _ ail a rve the lots to the eat as well as proVide access to the C v / Openspac �.1G�I �re!ana�aa e S.W. .. BLVD. . a state highway, there Will curbs and sl 1 w lk improve eats constructed acrosa the frontage of tax lot ge0 AC may required. • awe r- J4' SOLAR ACCESS is pr,vided to lots 132 through 127 by their nett South orientation being in excess of 90 feet Lots 128 through 130 have a north-south dimension of 41 feet and Cannot meet the solar requirements due the basic confguration of the property and the required e> ;ten ts ion of S. W . Fanno Creek Drive access caus ing sing the lots to access the road a s shown. The solar code Provides for a 20% exemption of the nvmher, ' o:e lots in the development which ch ' in thin as would be (2) two lots. The code also provides that if in trying to meet the code there is a 5 in rea to in development cost or loss of building: site that there shall also be an exemption granted. This 5% would amount to $14,400-00 if a lot were removed �� an i 1 loss or �: pp, \7oximately *32,,00 ®00. The plan as submitted there would a meets the solar access code. SEgVICES & UTILITIES: SANITARY SEWER is available from the Existing system and will be extended as shown. WATER SUPPLY is supplied by a 8-inch pipe at the north end of Drive and will extended �a�nno Creek �sr extended to serve the project z„nd for future extension. STORM DRAINAGI? will be collected as shown and discharged to the flood Plain. The minimal wetland will be graded and filled All soils work will ll b done under the direction of a dolls engineer and will be tested to assure that it meets the standards. of p y will city Tigard �an ldthe� various agencies standards to the a��l: All facilities ��.�.1 be constructed Electrical power, , telephone, natural gas and cable television facilities are available to the site • SAd J, r' J, JI N r f 11 f 1 Poal p'" 0t F CNa1 Irx T ra( �r i sn Etta/. Memo 7672 fr x .ttg. u u , 11 4 4,N f 5: "�oCmw�I N pPenvy i " rl n I If 1 0 1,0111, At to/ 1 N J I 0f+ 1 4 r Y l y 1{t � T nd�lyC�.oa i w.nrarNd r r r• to 2-�/ "1 � J f)� „„ " .e. 1kirtu ° m\NAGuz N f 14 11 1 /01 1101 ' omsnl I 1f NI I 1 11 f • ill11 In 1a 11{ 14 1 hr 11 �% I ,r I ,11, 1I M'X IM AI 1 0.. .0,1 1 f 0 11 I IA 4 1 ( d IN II I l u , 010 I I If 11., U N it ]•l, r f N I: 1,, I � ll.l�)ii 1(.,111 (hllh InN n1Ixln�Nw6I1rb 110 fR f +.rl ., IJ IhI 1 f6 .6 • 11' +N1An«..N 61. • 60, a . l r l l 0 .,111 f/ I Y 1 6 1 1 7 1 /Jw T. r n.�l Nr ?.� Iwlh 4/, Nl. 'n.xn.l Nr ....,+lx` .d 1 O I. tip .Nn llr r .1 .1,. Lk, :i,. 01 Ir. II..N1111 111111 .14 6.i . .,N. Ml .1h,, 6..,.. 1 O.* Ira°" f��lp- !'i /�[rp/ O. 10 .,f 111rJ�17 +11W 0010..tirvlll Of r?.. «N ., It. N. N ll !,•.I+.i•• IN IL• it•:.tir Ni 1 rINN) lhl r V 1• •N Ay � ,r. 14111 �I IwJ141i1" II J JNilr¢ `Lt ` 1 ♦' I • �"%VQ1il5 . 1 M 1, 11 1711 V .v M�•�,rYn�'�NI�MMg�§ §1,4iri��/�•�j �`•j•1��1��{ "t .illy 1.N 1 •,.I, IiJ II.F M mlih, •1 Nr �'TitOA�«3453. + f II hifl • rn Nwwh NIM1 }' 0s$tr0t Rltum DC►N}orp!t4uD 1! N..rriJ lN. ...1 rhr ,+r.«Iw 6JIIw�IJ«.rV .l rllr +nx IhuN• wn lrl:6II.11f 11r 6601 N 60 74 rh V16,10 wrn,J1 NI« I •f !. d, 1 6, n., 06 4,0461 ANC NI wII w NP 4, r1 V,n rr •rf J 1:6r hr r604111 lllrriu r4 iw6 ,..161,6 6.606 H. NN u, 6r 'PI... Proparty z0 R511565 26112PB -00200 (Real Property) gal Description: ACRES 2.53 Oener I z 200021 rxNL8Y, 2Dt4ARD .7 6 LOTS h 14010 8`N HALL , BLVD TIOARD, OR 97224 Si'Cit19 i 14010 SW HALL `3LVD cede tl ea 026,74 Sitempl3.orte Mort Lender: 1992 Talc Statue Current Levied Taees : 2,858.77 SpecLal AtOeuetnent8 s * ** No Taxes DU° *** Depreau the RETURN key Prop Class t 4012 Neighborhood: 4Txd Year Built c 1920 Living Area 5 3546 Sale Date a 11/06/91 male Price : 10 Deed Type a Dw Inst Nraaaher 91062546 1992 Property Jalttee Itnprovemente $ 62,610 Land $ 62:860 Total Ad:deesded S 125,190 Exemptio61rt 6 0 Taxable $ 125,190 m�a [6ii0s4 Di eiD DW °I 18 11♦ wue es46t t64iaro�ie; MI•11.1111=1.1111Mo c� d 101U.1 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAW 10001 SE SUNPYSIDE ROAD 4915 SW PHONE ((503) 653 7300 OR FAX (503) METRO S CAN PROPERTY POF I LE Washington County * * * * * * * * * *�.* * * ** * * ** ** * * * * *** ***** * *. * * ** * * ** * * * * * * * * *** � * * * *, * * ** ** OWNERSHIP. INFORMATION Ref. Parcel #.2S112BB 00200 Parcel No. :R0511565 TRSQ 02 S Owner :FINLEY EDLRD J LOIS ANN CoOwner Site Address :14010 SW "HALL BLVD TIGARD 97224 mail Address: 14010 SW HALL BLVD, TIGA 3D OR 97224 Telephone : SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION 01W-12-NW NW Transferred DoctMent # Sale Price • Deed Type Loan Amount: Lender Loan Type ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Land :$62,880 Structure :$61,510 Other Total :$124,390 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Exempt Amount: EXempt Type t Improved :49 Levy Code' :02374 91 -92 Taxes :$3,231.48 Map Grid :655 F5 Census :Tract 308.01 Block Land Use : 4 012` MI SC, TRACT LAND,IMPROVEb Legal :ACRES 2.53 * * PROPERTY eliAPACTERISTICS Bedrooms :4 Bathroon :2,00 Heat Method :WALL FU1N Pool App1ianoe i Dis wagh or Hood Fan Deck Garage Type Lot .Acre :2-53 Lot SqFt 11.0,206 BsmFin SF BsmUnfinS F: 832 Bldg SqFt :2,548 Porch SqFt: Attic ScgFt:640 beck Bcgi t Garage ` SF Year .B 4i1t :a920 'EffYearB1t :1960' Floor Cover: Foundation :CONCRETE Roof Shape :GABLE Roof Mat]. :WD SHINGLE Wall Met l I iterior ia.t: DRYWALL Paving Matt :ASPHALT *k * *'k' * ** 44.** *irk ** ** 0 ** i r * ** * * * * * * *a * * * ** a * *, ,; *; * * * * * * * ** * . * * ** The Inf ►rmatia n Provided 'Is Deem e?d Rel�ab1eb But £s Not Gu ,rante i. 91 14ot4= 4 -s 88t#H Wai i s e b t 266 t is®izi0 w st. r 112.1.10MND OF T703U1D0 0 ►_ Pile M: Ron PcumiroY , Assistant Planner ►rEsy 1 ., ;1993 i JECTs Lot ,. orientation for two lots o SUB 93 -0004 a telephone ,call with itr, Larry •p to .n t .approx in tely;1 :30 prit n-541-93, it , wad pointed out by Mr. Epsstein. that a condition of appreVair eras q'i isaing°" from the final order. Page; 3 of the final, order . states* ,she priVatoss ® v with section 10.108.070, subject, to conditions that en3u t. 90propriate Changes are made to the prel.iminary plat, inc1uct re.- orienting .lots 126 and 127 and ,establishing a Gaon -acdes . strip along the north edge of the northerly lot. This wait intended to be restated as a condition of ap rwa1 in the final order. The laok iyc�t of finding listed � Condition doss alleviate the appli an t f�� his obligation. �Q �otreorient lots 126 and 127 and cea strip along ti edge of the northerly lot would Cause tie private street ' to be in the final ,der. This would Create a i order. overloaded as specified ��ci�.enoe situation in conflict ,t with the intent of section 14.108.07O. the pp be bound b ► the 1 ��ntinu� diecttfaion found on page three and in paragraph two of the final d3.�soussi P � order, if PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE TITLE: " i /ey e /WI; le . ! q APPLZ��NT,. Al; a,,, l2 S7' L'1 AGENT: Hek'C' MornoN , t soctc, -'e QUEST: ' .17 2 2.3 r' ! 6'1 clerair,J2 ;v APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA f rev" I Oz146-?Arli 7-5) old .5e.,4,4 r I8,8q 18%88 18 .$m.. t ', 1® ': te, to ' 18, 1111 18. 18. i6e,.■ ' LOCATION: /foie) s„,..1 1-10,.(1 6001,:mick 124 2'4)6) W c779 NPO NO: NPO CHAIRPERSON: &i tii PHONE NUMBER: K3 5-8 .23 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION gomENTS _ DUE BACK TO SPAFF O Q PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF BEARING: HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF WARING: -... CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: REQUEST. FOR COMMENTS ,RANI? ATTACHMENTS: r VICINITY MAP NARRATIVE SITE PLAN SCAPING PLAN ARCHITECT •: OTHER :. 9''1.° li` r t0a t� rut T STAFF CONTACT; Y • CTY OfP �`IG `:, R D OEeoN NEDI-; APPS, I;c/T CITY OF TIGARD, 1.3125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 1. GENERAL YNFORMATxON PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION N0/ 2 $'4,'2]L_ TAX MAY' AND TAX LOT NO. i.-A ----- SITE SIZE ;.., OWNER/DEED HoLDEE. *,tP,1. .,_=i,_✓ °. ..� PROPERTY OVER /.. ADDRESS ) k / © ,re. /i *' PRONE ZIP2' 4 CITY � �/2 � _...�. APPLICANT* 7.",./i/2 ADDRESS r��r /mac ,4ONi` CITY ZIP 9747-a applicant are different *When the owner and the app p a A 1 of record people, the. in possession �withtwritten au�.hori;•ation or�a lessee in p from the owner or an agent of the owner with written The o . ► two or� provided on�pageisw® or application space submit aaiwritten authorization with this ' application. 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY c • The owners of record of the sub e t property request permission to divide a I.es'30htei. Toni. Areas parcel into ,�„�,_,,, lots between (number of lots) and /��ac� square feet in s ze 4520P/13P Revd: 3/8$ FOR STAP, USE ONLY CASE NO. SCd L OTHER CASE i1O s s RECEIPT NO 12 t --r APPLICATION ACCEPTED AYs rl� DATE: Application elements submitted: (A) Application form (1) ..,--'C R ~ Owner's signature /written "horizatio ( ) Title trans :f er instrument (1) 4 Assessor's map (1) ) Preliminary Plat (p 'e -aFp checklist) Applicant's statement (pre-app checklist) �(C) List o y azsngu and• aden r $rf®" "er( y) pD ) Filing fee ($415 plus $5 per lot) ek• DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: ,:... r COMP. PLAN/ZONE PLAN/ZONE ZES GNATION: ... �� N.P.O. Atambers Pteliminary Plat Approval Date: Final Approval Date Planning Engi"Ae: c ; Nuber Recording Date and om mansinemovami en ` . A A • 9 • 77 'F 1,`h.� . List an variance, Planned Development, R Sensitive: dn�;, or other land use actions to be considered as .Pa t pp /s`'/ ! •,,,... • Applicants: To have a complete application You will need to, submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you subttlit this application a . THE ,APPLI (S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • tie Abov€. rE ues does- : not violate any deed _restrictions that ma ` be attached to or imp sed U ,u the snb'ect p -op�erty .......n �...rsm.�i�.a...�.: .AIM I. If the applicatZln is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and 'subject to all the conditions and limitetions of the approval. statements i. q plot plan, • All of the above sta3temen transmitted � ��i � are true p and the attar Eet s, and eaChibits u ; pp acknowledge any . perm t ` issued based on this application, ,a 8o acl�aaow�.�ed�.e tha alica may he revoked if it id, found i ii any ' aUch Statements are false. aPP1icapt has road the entire contents of the »Application, includi the policies and : g s' for a pp;:©ding criteria. aid u�nt�ersta�nds the re urent /..)t denying the application.. � r . DATED �chiasyi � 1 19, SIGNATURES of each owner (e . husband. an d wife) of the subject propert;p . It) '1140 P � N5i - � 'YNM kW W+I w. "i�7M•`0,f 121' 00:0,',II. ri.PAI., MAY 0 7 '1993 II1TLAND LAND USE NOTIFICATION F DIVISION OF STATE LANDS 'WETLANDS PROGRAM 775 Sumner Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97310 503/378-3805 sCounty : G S IjJ & j a City: °t -d c/,ti P APPLIICANT: ' d , i ce► '(L Local case File No.: OSL File No.: WSJ DiviSION TA' E LANDS iss 11 8 s' Jill '33 su F name name PARS q sw C „ I.Y IQ S- -4J f ,.4 ( al to 4. street street cit state zip city state zip 59 10_. -. -- phone phone Ie LOCATION: T R --.-- S / 4 quad Attached: arne , NWI q ma'ip )( Parcel map N I map n Tax Lot(s):. �+ (attach copy with site indicated) �.....,. Site plan _., Other SITE INFORMATION: -► NMI Wetland Classification Codc(s) P0' / Soil Ser a es Name (optional) �., ._.o.... .. Adjacent Waterway i any) f!4 -avid r° % In cloodpla�ir� d, Current land Use _q m,r/--co, Zoning PROPPED ACTIVITY: site plan approval X_ grading permit conditional use permit building permit Zone Change to Project Description» 5,0ga4 W 6 %fs /�► . ` .a ± r.i.� 5�1- S ett ll i fiiVe Aa ' t5- C'Y'A . f r Alci jj Gy . �� Y• i'C' N �' _ : subdivision . planned unit development ... public works . ci fy) X _ other . ia, 'i ti 44.04. r , feted by/Contact: . ' ,,. Da to ^��';: d`' Address .Scab !( 7Z3 Phone . .:.;, (This _Corsi + ormi as to be completed ctn1, by planfl . ng department staf4' fox mapped svetlant s) DSL RESPONSE C3 A removal -fill per'mi t i s required from the Division of State Lands . Q A removal -fill permit Will be required when the development project proceeds. A removal -f l l pertni t cnay be regiati red. .3 Information needed i nc l ude s : 0 A Wetland determination /delineation reptrt. co i a �e d. State permit ,,r_,,�, s sst] has 6 een apPl i d for. Ufa reinaval -=f i 1 d perWi t i 5 relv , resl t'or the desCri hed pro. ect lbecause . ed m � s�, �et = c� Y� .�r � f.�e.. e? � e a. a p y ' r ers (326- 6995)syr� aM� (� A ern�i �y b� requi red b� � the t�� bs of Engine ; ,� ,� Comments • Resp ...i�pl ete� by» apse co o invbl� f the project i s anged re f,111 state remoda1 -�f11l permit w'i11 bra required. CITY OF TTGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY HEARINGS OFFICER Coe-' / : al.ng Case lumber (a) : SUB 93 -0004 / aLR , 9 003 Name of Owner: Edward F, tn1ev Name of Applicant: tom Millar Builder Address 4 BW Edae ►ter pt. City Ilgctzd, Sta -e Aaddre to of Property; 14010 SW Hall Bculevard Tax Map and Lot N(a) .: _231 12BB ; t?.x lot 200 Request (R Zip 122 Zone: AUDRrcavaI to divide narks . of approximate 1-69 a T e a�isalicant rep data Sukidiwi®ioxx ire agree intp nine lots_ rancjing aptween 5 000 and 11 850 gggare finet in size. A Sensitive Lands appproval ie rerxuested to allow aground iisturcbangg g a mmscimateIy_30 to 35 cubic .garde �.n a wetland. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Devel2pment Code Chapgera 18 w 52 Y 18. F34, 18 t38 18.92L 18.102 10.108 18.114S3 150,. 188.160,x. an__d_ 1 @.164a Cqmrehensive ylalicies 2.1.1: 4.2.1 7 .,1..2, . . z., 7.4.4 8.1.1 and 8.1.3. n -7 (Residential, 7 units /acre) The n -7 zone allows single family attached or detached reaidentia1 unite, duplexes, pub ®cecup tropnfac ties, farming, manufactured homes, public eu p , family day care, and accessory structures among other oases. Action: Approval as requested Approval with conditions Denial Notice: Nc d ice was published in the new - paper, posted at City Hall, and mailed to 2 The applicant and owner(s) X Owners of record within the requirod distance X The affected Nei•Thor_hood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 8. Final : sCision: THE DECISION SHALL 82 FINAL ON UNLESS AI APPEAL IS FILED. The adapted findings of fact, ceciElon, and Statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard city Hal<:, 13125 sW mall, P.O Bo c 23397, Tigard, 0regc n 97223. 9 APPOttit Any party , to the d8diilion clay appeal:: this deciesion in accordance „ With 18 ,32 290 (B) and Section 18.332.310 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 da P ter notice is given and ma be submitted o.. d meet be accompanied by the appeal fee ($315.00) Can forme an et�n. eappeal may L - 00 ) and tra�i ®carp a (Nay {t en up to a maximum cf $500i00). The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p. I f yoU have an y quea tions pledge Call she City Tigard Pla ninep a tment � 63 171. STATE O1& OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard If opone and ea t►: (Please Print) That X am a * ' The City of 'ward, Oregon. That X served NOTICE Or PUBLIC •SING; FOR: being first d &iy nn Oath City'. of Tigard Planning Dirootor,: igard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Crux vil 1 copy (Public gearing Notice /Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Narked ed eas shown on the 19115 bed an an a Pro r3 ate a9 t and dePosibed nschibit "A ") war mailed to each named per ®Tasi at th ; ad attached list marked e3:htLL !"8" on the day of said notice NOTXCE OF 9ECXSXON as hereto attached, Was le bra in board on the day of #i W'.i�� e�am4 the United States I aL1 ..ryGon t1 Vontage prepaid. Prepared Notice /Ulf of mess. E.OLOPel. 4 1...#2!TICE OF tap L..x RING NOTE: HARING' DATE HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED DULED NOTICE IS HE : BY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD ?s ARI ?GS yr r IOER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, April_ 26 19930 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HAIL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDI'R THE FOLLOWING APPLIVAATION: FILE NO, SUB 93- 0004 /SLR 93 -0003 FILE TITLE: Finley /Miller NPO NO: 5 APPLICANT: Tom Miller, Builder 12454 SW Edgewater Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 AGENT: Harria- M'Nonagle Associates, Inc. 12555 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Edward Finley 14010 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: UBDIVIBXON SUB 93 -0004 SENSITIVE LANDS SIR 33 -0003 F.T.NLEY SIkLER (NPO #5) The applicant reguesta Subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide a parcel of approximately 1.69 acres into nine lots ranging between 5,000 and 11,850 square feet in size. m' Sensitive Lands approval is requested cTetestrad to allow a ground disturbance of approximately 30 to 35 eubiu yardn in a wetland. , ". 102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150,,10,160 and 18.16`4• Comprehensive •iv, APPLXCA} LE REVIEW CRITERIA: Commuaait Development Code Ch,a 1.ere 18 52, 18 1,8w�.y88 /w�1�a;,. 92, 1�3. qpy� 1 p/� �% � }( /� �je and R a Plan Polic...es 2.1.1, 4.2.1, I .1.2, / .3.1, 7.4.4, �Y. i .le and 8.1.3. LOCATION: 14010 SW Hall Boulevard (WCTM 251 12HN, tax lot 200) (Residential, r ®/ re) The R -7 zone allows single family attached or detached r s4 oential unite, duplexes, public support facilities, farming, ng, manufacctured homes, home occupations, family day care, and accessory structures among other usO THE PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED IN .ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULE S O' 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD r �' CHAPTER 18 BY �'" CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT MITTEN T TIN. ONY ON THIS A C T WRITING PRIOR TO OR A THE PUBLIC w61R1NG- ORAL TLSTIMON 3 MA BE PRESENTED PAT THE PUBLIC . HEARING. AT 'T' PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGI1 OFFXCERy WILL RE�CIEv A ST THE PUBL� C HEAFdT ,�,• Aft STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM T�� CITY PLANNER, OPEN ..... ..._. s�U INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAX C'' i INUE THA PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTIONION THE APPLICATION. ADDITIONAL A PERK ON suak OS {CLOSE NCE I,�1 SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER .. ... T.J ENTITLED NTO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IFITHERE 11S NO C NTINUANCE VPJ TE �]� D CA�i THE i�F QUES HEARING, ANY P VTI IP�� NT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD !WAIN OP '1! DAYS AFTER THE HEARING d INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A :LIST OP ,Aii ROVAL 'CRITERIA: APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM , TEE TIGARD COMMIP.T.I f DEVELOPMENT CODE C THE TIGARD MPREW NSa� PLAN, OR ►_ISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST E ' THE .HEARINGS 'OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON VASE CRITERIA AND THES41 CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRI'IP"RXA YLXSTER. OF �" THE HEARING ON , THE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT S)NE POINT PRIOR TO TEB CLJDSE FAILURE � RAISE Ate ISSUE Q ST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFIV'rENT SPECIFIC/T , TO APPEAL TO THE AFFORD DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON "°HAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA aN THE ABOVE —NOTED 5 FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR . DAYS PRIOR TO THE N�Aiitl�i't3.rA COPY OF TA,IN�ff'D FOR TEN CANTS PER PAGE, , AT LEAST NSPECVION AT NO C ?ST OR COPIES CAN BE OB SEVEN t AVAILABLa FOR INSPECTION AT NO. COS P i7 OR A CO? X CAN BE OBTAINED NED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER Rcon Pa er.42x ,„ AT 639-4171, TIGARD GXT1t 'HALL, 13125 SW 1 ALL BLVD'. , OR CORTAC,T YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD LANN ING ORGANIZATION (NPO) # . .�... C ttA] RPERBON a q' Pots* � a STREET • 2S112811000300 .... .... ......... o . YOUNG, IDA M ESTATE.OF ' % EOLLAND,, STEVEN P ai ' °ERESA C 14070 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 &J.:A(31TV- - 2811288 -00400 �neooe♦.ogm.b•s5...00♦ COLONY CREEK ESTATES OWN ES OF ALL LOTS 97223 2S1128H- -00500 .c ••.pdee•eeo�•AO.sm SY.'LTER, JOHN W AND TERESA R. 8555 SW COLONY CREEK COURT TIGARD, OR 97223 2S112B8 -00700 .......r....o.......o KENYON, R dRI C 8455 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 2S1i2B8.-00900 0 oo *GOooleee•...00 WRIFiKLE, OLETA W 8395 SW COLONY CREEK CT T/GARD OR 97223 2S112BW -00600 .ees.so,•o000oe••.oe.o SFLIVONCNICK, GREGORY A AND GEORGANN$' 8505 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 2811288.00800 ioiw•O•••,••oe�•o• ATWOOD, RODNEY 11 AND JENNIFER A 8405 SW COLONY MEEK COURT TIGARD OR 97224 25112BH -41000 .o• os•"s 0' WEN, VICKIE 8375 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 2511288 -01100 .•ec•.oe...0.0•41444o HELD, MARY LOU 8365 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 2511288 -01300 .•.Oeesolo.O4•ee•4404 MILLIGAN, JENNY It 8335 ,SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 28112«� BB -01200 '..................... rotl.niOk.7 a IER RAOUL AND JEANNE 8345 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 2811288 -01400 .O.O.Ob..e..00♦ Y Oe CCCKREBAM, DENNIS C AND MITZI A 8325 SW COLOWY CREEK DR' TIGARD OR 97224 2S11288 -01500 .o.s.o•o...•..•.o•oo. PENNINGTON, DAVID R C MARTIN, MAURITA 8305 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 2S11288 -01700 .W ' qON, MAX W +Si 1EVHRL t 1375 S W COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 2S1121311.°01690 4 eeooe.elne0 CRIkr— BROWN', MART,UA M 8285 SW COLONY CREEK DRIVE TIGARD OR = 97224 2811288-01900 . +e .... ........ ..• SNYDHA4 RUSSELL JAY & KATHERINE 8250 SW COLO'n CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 25112813 -01800 w0000Nw000rp0000gw0000 BECKMAN, FRANCES 8255 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OA 97223 2511208-02000 44o ..e e.U•oo +iiN U. 8270 COLONY CREEK DRIVE & cREN, I Hulk & SO 'FEN 8948 SW BAABUR ' BLVD #200 PfaRVLAND 0R 97219 2811288-0210D seo4o4odio4e044eee40 ERN{AN KEIfia EDWARD 8280 SW CoLCN3f CREtt, CT. TI0 RD OR 9'1222 2s2.12118 -02200 .. i is . e e e CP$EY, STEVEN AND HARczh 8300 SW COLONY CaEK COURT: tXGARD OR 97224: 2811288- 02300. ...•o w.10•0 wRIGHT-cialToN, SUZY R 8310 SW COLONY tBEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 410 2511288 - 02400 oww go®ewdoecese RUSSIE, DONA L Q JOHN & ALICE 163 DELA ROM ocEANSIDE C.A 28112B8 -02500 .s..oe.�e...o....s.o. M_LNE, JONATHAN L AND GRACE ,X 13570 SW` 63RD PLACE Iy0RTLAND OR 97219 2811208 -02600 .ww...e. .. MILLER, JONATHAN L AND GRACE K 13570 ' SW 63RD P PORTLAND D OR 97219 2811288 "42700 0 ... . 0 w .. 0 .. . GARBING, DAVID W 8370 sN 190E+0NY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 28112E8 -03300 ........ FINLEY, CARL L AND MARGARET E 11250 SW GCE TIGARD OR 97224 2S1128B- °04700 BARTHoL0 Tw, JoHN K 6s KX14EERLY M 14145 S"W FANNO cREmx CT TIGARD OR 97223 �c}� /.gyp0 2511288 . 0490 . ....m..o. .00a m.s• BERN7ANDEZ, reauTDEL F AND GAYLE L 14130 SW Film() CR? EK DR - TIGARD OR • 97224 2511288 -02800 ....m LuTTER, STEPO M AND E�EIGI , AXE 8390 8W COLONY CT TIGARD OR 9723 2511280- 04600 ..'m.s.eo.- �.s.a•o..aio FRAZIER, CHARLES W 14155 SW FAN No cREEK DR TxGARD CR 97223 2511223- 04800' a .40004.004.00000 PAUL, ALEXANDER TR Fo PAUL FAMILY TROST 14137 SW FANG cREEK DR TIGARD OR 97223 vmM 25112B3 -05000 •.....e.00..O.b.�... GEIL, CRIB K 8385 SW rANN0 CREEK DR TIGARD OR 97223 251288 -05100 OmOUe.. a .A•...�.N.m BULL, 'VALERIE RIM & DAMON R J365 Sw FANN0 CREEK DR TIGARD OR 97224 2 112B8 -05300 •.. ie. a•••row.l 5a )o CROUCH, JOY H 8345 SW FAO CPEE1': DR TIGARD OR 97224 2511280 -05200 O •.m.• oiee GUYER, KAREN J . 8355 SW FANNO CREEK DR TIGARD OR 91223 2511288- 05400 .ne.oess.e..idme0000e RI AN,, I WSsELL J AND LYNN M 8325; $w FANNO CREE3 DR tiOA0 Olt 97223 25112E8 -05500 ...... . . ...sea eb B0FFENSACR, GREG J 8305 sW V'ANNo, CREEK DR TIGARD OR . 97223 28i12EII •05700 e.- .0so.s'.e..emuew.e M AYNARDt ROGER L AND BARBARA. ANNA 8265 SW ]'ANNO CREEI DR TIGARD OR 97223 2S112813,.105600 .... .... ..... 11XINNES8E3C, tto KEVIN AND SNAR0N L 8285 SW yAMIlo C Eoi I9�t TIGARD OR 97214 2811285- 605800 e.•m.e.o..O.o .•oe�wd RoBERTsoN, WILLIAM d: 8255 aW FANNO CREEK »R vE' TIGARD OR : 97223 28110M-11800 .!•4 -eas AORUD, DANIEL L AND LAURA R 14103 SW omen cligsR PLACE TIGARD OR 97224 41128 -12000 a•s�•sssoeue• *eau *e,e,a AL) , JOSEPH T AND ADE,txi J 14080 SW PkNNO CSI E LOOP TIGARD: OR 971124 281128B- 1.12e30 aoese0e0.40o4 SCOTT, ROR11` T AND WANDA L 14090 SW .1+"ANNO C PAEK PLACE ',VIGAiD OR 97224 04 4604104,00 2S102DD- m00600 ...na.sa1ise0r4 es•e0 LEASON, EMIL 47 GERTRUD 13880 STS HALL IILV1) TIGARD OR 97223 20102y s►�q �y wp q 13D -00101 00..444444 • 6444444440, VONEEIDENEN, SVEN & ANNE 13990 SW HALL TIG 4D OR 97223 2S102040- -00803 Q•O.O •4.O.040.4Y•• DUR! N, CARL LEE /JENEANE 139815 SW HALL TIOA D OR 97223 25102DD- 008081 44444444o° 4600044400 iCHULZ, MARTHA % CURTIS, DAVID L AND . a:MSTAN 11610 SW HAWK LDGE RD TIGARD OR 97224 28111AR -00109 TIGARD,' CITY OF 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 2817.. �, y� ....,) 0 A.B.dC�k'i ° ®0.i�3H0 444.44 o • o o.. o o r it 4 4 4 4 m 0' CONNELL, KATHLEEN C 14085 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 28111AA- 00500 $ 6 0 a7 4 4 4 4 4 MOORE BROS OONBT INC RSON0 RICWdD L AND DICE A 86s SH, MCDONALD TIGARD OR .91222 ';.Sli ,2X5B --1 .900 1i ..... • .. . ......... . MAIM, SUSAN 11 14095 SW FANNo CREEK PL TIGARD OR 97224 211112BJF/'' 12100 ea e a e • e s w e 0 0 «, • • +.4 �,• MASON, lar,Z IP J & HELEN X 14078 SW FANNO CREEK PL TIGARD ,OR 97223 281120B -12900 444444..4e444e4,41 •o TITAN PROPERTIES COIRF P0 BOX 6835 mom. OR 97007 28102D0- 0070! e0.4o4.M00e44s.e b.40 VON HEIDEr N, SVEN AND ANNE 1990 m HALL ,BLS TIGARD OR 97223 2S102DD -00802 44444ee44e4440•440444 BOSSY', ARTHUR 13915 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR '91223 2S102DD -- 00805 •4440.04•••000• ?44..4 WHITMAN, WAYNE IAI+ BETTY A 8665 SW : MCDOD TIGARD OR 97223 2S1i11A -- 001100 44,,oeeeses44044444444 TIGARD, CITY OF 13125 5 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 28111 AA -0020® 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 44444,4404444 MalawZIE, A R DOROTHEA 14075 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97224 a1'�. �..11 y.. �Q � }.► � /.� ',111 28111.1AA- 0040: eeOeioObi!0, 4044' • coo e40'11' HALL BOBbE ARD B�aa<' �y� TIs1T CHURCH P0 BOX 230130 TIARD OR 97223 2810100- 01400 io 404 4444444uo•040i4 STARICWI'ATHER, IWAN ,M TRUST ST4'_..R, ROBERT TRUST Dom,. MILTON 0 301 kw Nw MURRAY RD POR LA►YID OR 07229 • 'TOM MILLER', BUILDER 12454,, SW EuraWATER TIOARD O ! 97223 EDWARD FINLEY 14010 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 ' 2IS- MCMONA.GLE ASSOC. INC. 12555 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR _ 97223 CRAIG oOrtINS 7430 Ski VACS ST TIGARD OR 97223 Nir STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard That I am a ..�;. t , ' " , _ Ls y'.,,, for The City of Tigard, Oregon*, 11".: T hat I served NOTICE O ' PUBLIC INN FOR That I served NOTICE OF DECISION yoRt City og T,i a d Plan ning Director Tigard Planning Commission Via/' "T .gard ,EIear4,nga Officer Tigard !'ity Council. c (Puhlia Hearing Notice/Notice of Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named' .... " ° said htice NOTICE OF )ECISION ao he attach list marked exhibit E° on the * bulletin board on the _____ day of _ in the United States mail ok'z the Z dlay of postage prepaid. DecLa an) of which is attached' (Merked s at th add,: Se shown on the ay' of attached, waasn' posited on an appropriate and depspitted 29 ... V Premed Notice. NoTANY PUBLIC of oR Gr My Comois®ion Expires: N O T I C E O F P U B L I C HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE Ti'3ARD HEARINGS 017FICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, April 12x. /993, AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE *O SUB 93 -0004 /SLR 93 -0003 FILE TITLE: Finley /Miller APPLICANT: Tom Miller, Builder 12454 SW Edgewater Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 AGENT: Harrie- McMonagle Associates, Inc. 12555 S1' Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 NPO NO: 5 OWNER: Edward Finley 14010 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: SUBDIVISION SUB 93 -0004 SENSITIVE SLR -0003 F1 N L.Y MILLER (NPO #5) The applicant requests Subdivie on preliminary plat approval to divide a parcel Of approximately 1.69 acres into nine lots ranging between 5,000 and 11,850 square feet i,n size. A Sensitive Lands approval is requested to allow a ground disturbance of approximately 30 to 35 cubic yards i,r14 a wetland. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Cede Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.88;, 18.920 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1,2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: 14,,010 SW Hall Boulevard (WCTM 281 120B, tax lot 200) ZONE: R-7 (Residential, 7 units /acre) ThEy R -7 zone allows single family attaohed or detadned residential units, duplexes, public support facilities, farming, manufactured homes, home occupations, family day care, and accessory structures among other uses THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULE` OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18,30. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION my no SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC NEARING, ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECIEVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE HCITY �PLANNER; PEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN "TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION IF A PER SOM SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO T HE APPLICATION AFTER . MARCH 23 + 1995 , ANY PARTY IS ^Ernr7/D AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY R ►, u, .' �¢ THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING INCLUDED IN 'NIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APP:tOVEL CRITERIA A?P1 XCABLE TO THE REQUEST. FROM THE TIGARD CcMP a O i E TIGARD t".OMPREHENSIVE PLAN. � b I2'�t' DEVELOPMENT CODE � ,; � ,` UPON HE HEARINGS OFFICE, WILL BE BASED CRITERIA I, c THE IA ONLY A_ THE !HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF 1' BY 'E!T'�ESE .,,RIT�RIA AS�IJ ' HE`SE C1E�IT�•R�C� m COMMENTS RELATING .TO THE REQUEST 2ERTAIU SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLIC ,,.,.iie CRITERIA LISTED ',FAILURE TO RAISE AN L►$ISIUE PERSON OR BY L'OrTER AT SOME POINT 1! ?RIOR TO THE CLOSE Off` ' ']CHE HEARING ON � c �� OR N� i~ r C RWEP41[Si1 TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN RD 'RE DECISION Nip L(EF. AN at'1/�ILKA4E .T'O `NT EF THi, R1 �UE� PROVIDE P •� 4PPOR ;� , ,� y DE SUFF C APPEAL TO THE' LAND T. E BOARD OF AP ►EALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE AP ALL DOCUMENTS Tab PS- Pi•ICABLE 'CRIiIRIA IN THE ABOVE •NOTED FILE ARE ::TAILA7,3Lt FOR I%S,PECTION ?a NO COSH' FOR COPXES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST S Y PRIOR THE ` HE OBTAINED STD FOR REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR OR INSAD :TTON AT NO COST, OR A COPY CA. CENTS PER PAGY' . �p�,N .D,� ,. � PRIOR TO THE= HEARING, A COPY OF THE ;STAFF R FOR FURTHER I FORMA TtON PLEASE CONTACT THE S TAF' PLANNER Ron P ome i o. AT 539 -4171, TIOARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW a? +L BLVD OR C� �Q NEIGHBORH OOD §LANI AuI�� IONp (NPO) tHAIRPERSON. ,to R4 ,140.1YAR e STREET id' ■■r s.w 0LOUV' °NITA 251158 -400.300 ..•ere•ws�•ov.or.w h. YOUNG, IDA It ESTATE OF itfi WAND , STEVEN ` F& TERESA C 14070 SW HAIL BLVD TIGATM tit 97223 (41 1S11288.-00400 ODIANY ES LOTS 7223 err 00 • S ot>eeoess 2Sinus -oo s0aY 5!LTBIt, mxtet W AND 57.XYASSA It 8!' 55 SW 03LOPTY MEEK COURT TIC OR 97223 2 �y .�g'� ` -04. �I r • o e .. a o' i'rS.CoJhi{�,R'�%`., ru�C1 S.�TMEO s �• � s o .... rs o • 5L0, GlUtGORY A AND aEORGANNE 8505 SW COLONY tC CT TIGARD 011 97224 281112700 bao . edaaM.e rierrac„, miuuc 2455 SW omen gairalla TIC OE 97223 28112a13.,40900 0 00 WRINKLE,' CLEM II 8395 SW G CT non!) OR 97223 2S1128B93110D . o.obe rsr eeoeooee LOU E War 8365 S '4301.00T CREEK CT TIGIM OR 97224 2S11288.a01300 X11 MILLIGAN, JENNY 1 8335 SW C®Y N'Y CREEK CT TIGARD 011 97224 251,12 1sJo oemososweeeeosess.eb• ISaMar DAVID R & MARTIN, .. VtiIIJRI`;a. /1305 SW =WU AIREEK CT TIGARD R 97224 263.12101-00800 600- . ..000.O ®♦ ATT ODa RODNEY H END .710INIFICR A 8405 SW COWRY CatEllIK COURT TIGARD OR V7224 2S11288- -0100 e o w •roe . o s. b 0' QUICK, VICKI 8375 SW coma. MINK CT TIGARD 97224 251,1.2Bl - 02200 bme.r, CL Ua.iERs RAOUL P.°4 JEANNE 8345 SW 1f3OLONE CillUTA CT TIGARD OR 97223 281120i-01400 n �q w 8112S0i- 014'00 o.4eoe4ee.00s4e60 ab COCKRE3AMA, DENNIS C AND HITZI A 8325 .'fit . COLONY atEEK ea TIGARD OA 97224 1:0112133-01600 a 0 k :1 ^w N, d'YART/a 1 8285. Si COWRY a DRIVE TIGARD, OE 97224 =1288-01/00 00 . . . . ... o .. r r ImoN, 7 " °, ]L W a BEVBRLT 8276' SW CDTPicilf Cal= TIMM ct 97224 24M121913e1001s00 saoa aaaoroseeeissase•. SY M AS, FRANCES A255Sw. TIC 011 97223 • 2gil� 1 d;i1900 ae®sessoaoliaaeiwobcloe ss$ i! )E , RUSSELL JAI & KATEERMWE s260 ew COLONY ellItEIC tT T7,0ARD on. 97224 261128S p .p^ 1aliO6��2.L�.I® oweseoe•sus•oesemsad a+o b, 1® KEI.Tki EDWARD 8280 SW ' COLONY CREEK TaG RD ' OR 97223' 25112811x02000 44.444.4400°.°1°"4 ooe 8270 Cc►7o3 v ottitk imtvg cgittio 1 aqk SU YE 8948 Sig',' Ba�1D.° TM BLVD #200 FORM ANT) ' OR 9721.,9 251128x13.02200 ossa.m aomori3.44aa4'4 4 I � S8 ANI), I!AtCIA trio° SW COLONY !Y +REEK COURT ttoaRto CR 97214 J •• IIN �' ''Y e Z 14g u prJ. °4Pa °A °roprq► +tuo a° 008$9,116Z TSZ *IT, L6 'Ho allifoIZ ®jai 4s Stag ROVIIR8 cps hugs 0217 BlS'sS 0.°0-.0.11°0°0'0°°°°0°°". E,;ZL6 curia 0�O�i0 OF-1:10V., Reid p Fragsptig ' z`ai 0 0 0 0 0! 0 9 r•L 0 0 0• a 0 0 O 0 0I Y.%g SEIV1r6 X N14 .110. E.ZZL6 yp'��yy:.�� ` i O][ t • a °coo.' ° a m w o a L1®''Lo7o ►'t artirsz . ZZ•6 110 w'� LL tl i WSW ObliMa . fi' Sgt r VAN 7 �' ►� 1 O 0 O 0 • o e 0 w°® OO p 9Q 0ZTITZ E4;14,6 011V9II, Ha =MO ORAVA AS Ot181. W.m' "!`" r 0 r • 0 • • 0 • ° 0 .1 • • 00Se0 SZT1Tl. Z • Plla 110. 0V0L lie antra otzuva ma stile oorsorsourst fikalriL6 1k10 (AMU NN , cam $9Z'Lt s e• 01. •09.°q(i ,�0s— °O,O*•'••• •pp��,it, O ZITS . V� b�'�O�rf� Y•r7f(, * £ZZ46 wo fTNL ¥N =atm MUM MS • S8E0 000so 11ZWISZ E4ZL.6 io 6e aKao pia D mina M LEtter Winn Award' 9Inita • 11041 VI :'Ian '°`mod • '�►e►'Cr 1t70 011t017, =SW ORRITAff OEM auvo am a IMAM ' zmc ft•° 0 a 0 0 0, • 0 /I • • ° ter V • Y. Q• 'OO6t O'°`Ofi�i(�e'TTS EZZLP6 swum gialumawaga r•, 0 . 0, a.0000Q0000000000 ., 4P{ewLto- usretet v/ q�p.QFp, 4 !TAUS O .0:1164 samayana wit) an7BILE ••oit•aum.asr .O®fe�i.,A. a'�egZ r . !� Y' il` �1saw� ZZ46 0111E011 2=10 MLA 66 TV: ♦R4 Sftelairtg.1 0 0aag0000000rs r000a0 0 0 049100,,,tur a y .Yr•0 +1G 0 00* EZZL NO CriTOLL 241071300. 2 i 107 JO ' 06E0 NTT i 'SARCOMA GAAYHam" ° • arr.ro•r1a °•.00sso- tirresz 10ZZL6 'ill =Ma sinus amixtop OLEO 00 o o r° 9 r r r• r;m a 0.• p' a s :, c\iilf►i/ fern fTil(► =Mg 17;09 'Mg! OLSEt r O OO9Zo8gttSZ ., 05f lL6 ' e • +� ,el f. seat UES9 "3 04SE1 • x =W • • �Y' 1f .. , r•r O 0. • 4.4. P .V0 r OFD O' .:..00530 40aerkeeZ • e ', a ., • .L OZ6 'saxs :. ra 'EST ' or s °. wog 'gleam rarms.a.,•rrsore . asr ♦o• /rpt+� rri:Se ��/M W V f.J o7C� £;ZZ &e eirsirata, 6 %I ) 0, • ir,o oorzO E tTSz 28112811-11800 o e e: • e,d e e e 0 BOROD,1 DANIEL L AND LAURA X 14103 SW catozr CRS PLACE IWARD OR 97224 l 2S112013r.11 ; a .. e »0new�eee0eee�ieesrw CHI NN, BU81 14095 S RAMO CRECK PL TIGAM0 OR 97224: 251I20/42000 e o 0 0 a ARD MADELINE J 14089 ow NANO MEEK LOOP TIGARD OR 97224 e• ■9 w 0 0 0 i e e 00,000 2S112BB 121O1D aiti000tow tSASON, paturst S EtarEN 41,4078 SW VAN-N ®, TIGARD ON 97223 ..281121:18...12200 swamrse000oaA SCOTT, PORT T A b {ONDA L 14090 SW TAISHO CREEK PLACE Tzaante oft 97224 213112E3.42900 • i1r.0ed0eie.0iao•••a•0 TITAN PECALMTLES MKT PO DOX 6835 ALOHA OR 1007 23302DOw000600 000,000ee0000100000 0 LERSIN, P ZL 41•1 UD5 13880 SW TIM OR 97223 25102D1.O0vO0 i0�+0.0•AO0e00ese0 eeo00 VON BEIDE EV A ANi.IE d 13990 MI BALLAVD TIOARD OR z 97223 2:510200...00701 0as,o00,oe00e e0e 00ee00 VONEBMMOKMN, SVEN & ANNE 13990 so maxi rplarim CR 97223 23102M-40302 0 0 0 • * 0 .0 o. 0 330 iSH RDT, ARTHUR A 13915 S' HALL BIND. TIC CA 97223 2SI02DDa -00803 eoayeeseons io 400000000 DIN, CARL LIMATEIMANE A 13985 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 28111 0 00100 e 0 0 0 e 470-6 e 0 ti is e o • {r 0 • • • • =GAJl3D, OF 13125, SW IC4.LL BLVD TIORD OR 37223 Z 2S1O21y /..� DD —.0080 6 e eoweeer■O Doe WHITl t, WAY,NE I AND BATTY A 866x► SW B D TIGA D OR 97223 2Si.i.A. .►7lr0020® 000000000000e0e00.1!0e0 AIC.E NZIE, A R l 14075 SW ALL BLVD TI —NW TIGNW OR 94224 2511 'b0Q3Ov eeoe0eee soee00es0sese O'CONNELL, KATHLEEN C i4aSs sit BALL BLVD TIES RD OR 97223 28111.... / / ®a'�iC'�80al�} e c e yy®�� ....... a; m o • • • • m ®0 R CONCT % ANDERSON, RICHARD L AMD e7ANICE R ( k6 s •lo d TIM OR 07222 t MILLER BUILDER 12454 SW ED "CATER C ` law= b C) 97223' 2011 'OOO4Oi e c eaea ao ioseeedatiareii HALL BOULEVARD RRPT/ST CHOROB C , PO BOX 230130 TTD OtH 97 223 2B/0100-0140Q oeO00 o. �r o.r00..r STARKWEA91Sult, IVAN Al TRUST STAVcy A bl , ART TR UL '�' 1s ►�Wdw , NILToN 301 Ni l ,HURRAY AD PORTLAND OR 97229 AI) FINLEY 14010 SW BALL BLVD TIGARO OR 97222 28112813- •00300 ........... PZOUNG, /DA 1 ESTATE OF ROLLAND, STEVEN P & TERESA C 14070 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 281128B- 00 •• •a o••••'.. COLONY CREEK ESTATES OWNERS OP ALL LOTS 97223 28112BB- -00500 o......• ...e..... SYLTER, JOHN W AWD TERESA R 8555 SW COLONY CREEK COURT TIGARD OR 97223 2511288-00600 5SL.VONCHIeK, GREGORY A AND (EORG NNE 8505 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 17224 251128B-- 00700 . b . . • ........ • .... • . KENYON, ART 0 8455 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 2511218 -00900 .404.r00000sses4oseseso WRINKLE, OLETA W 8395 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 28112138- 01100 25112BH -0080 w uo..so ..ies.•.a ATWOOD, RODNEY H AND JENNIFER A 8405 SW COLONY CREEK COURT TIGARD OR 97224 2811288 - 01000. • . • .. , O'QUIN, VICKIE 8375 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 HELD, MARY LOU 8365 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 2511288.01300 eeirio.iie.o•nse MILLIGAN, JENNY 1 8335 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 2811289- '0150C'+ e...s .esd6.eoeu e PENNI.NGTON, DAVID R & MARTIN, MAURITA 8305 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97224 2511281'- 01700 eoe.r•eoes.o.oeo..o.W DIXON, MAX W & BEVERLY 8215 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 9/224 ' r� 281121:41t —01 900 iieeo..s.soe.o WAYDER, RUSSELL JAY & KATHERINE 8250 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 91224 23112BD-01200 ............. ...0111110. CLOUTIER, RAOUL AND JEANNE 8345 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 2511233 01400 a .oe•oe.e.eebe•cee. COCARECAM, DENNIS C AND MITZI A 8325 SW COLONY CREEK DR TIGARD OR 57224 2811288- 01600 CR7[I�2I -BI OWN, MARTHA M 8285 SW COLONY CREEK DRIVE TIGARD OR 97224 p 2811281- 01800 .. ies..fi'o.i.ee o.. BECKMAN, FRANCES 8255 6w COL0N13r DER CT TIGART OR 97223 ` 2511286 -02000 e,i.eo.oee..re.00i...i 8270 COLONY CREEK DRIVE & CUEN, , I NUA & SU FEN 894$ 8'0 BARW R BLVD' #x200 PORTLAND OR 97210 2.81281 -02100 8UNDEVMAN, KEITH. EDWARD 8280 SW COLONY CREEK r1:' Ttaiiitti 91223 ' 2S1.12S . os kA e i ii CASEY, STEVEN AND NARCIA 83u6 SW COLONY CREEK Could TIGARD OR 97224 04 w 2511288- 02300 ....Y•••r• ••eee00 CLAYTON, ; MICHAEL BRADFORD WRXGET- CLAYTON, SUZY R 8310 SW COLONY CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 2 S112B o 02500 ••00.....°000 i'. 0 0 000** MILNER, JONATHAN L AND GRACE K 13570 SW 63RD PLACE PORTLAND OR 97219 28LJ.2BB- 02700 0 00 ••0 0 a . .000 GARBING, DAVID W 8370 SW COLON' CREEK CT TIG4RD OR 97224 2S112135.43300 , . . . . . . . . . . • .. . .. . . O FINLEY, CARL L AND MARGA ' T E 11260 SW GAARDE TIGARD OR 97224 2811218 ..04700 . ..•...• •..e.•ea.30 BARTHOLOMEW, JOHN K & KIMBERLY M 16145 Std i"ANNO CREEK C TXGARD OR 97223 2S112/31304900 b s s a••• e b• e ,TERNANDI4Z, MANUEL F AND GAYLE L 14130 SW FANNO CREED: DR TIGARD OR 97224 •..,��7�n�.��i7��(�d.' ®V ^•« a• e e s e end d b i o a• e BULL, VALERIE KIM & DAMON R 8365 SW FANNO CREEK DR TIGARD Oh 97224 25112:88,,05300 •eeere•eei,aa «ed• CROUCI , 'OY m 8345 SW FANNO CREEK DR. TIGARD CR 97224 23112213 -05500 eee'.!50..•e.•e•• R )FFEN1ACKER, GREG ' 8305 SW FANNO CREEK DR TIGARD OR 97223 2S1 .2813 .-05;1p0Y,0 a ate•�a i d e o e to a e• s 1 A tYAgb, ROGER L AND BARBARA ANNA 8265 BW PASO bh TIGAt i OR 97223 • 251128B CO ..... O ....•030 e• RUSSIE, * +NA `.L & JOHN & ALICE' 163 DMA RONDO OCEANSIDE CA 92057 2811283- 02600 ••eoes•q...0000103000 MIL! ER, JONATHAN L AND GRACE K 13570 SW 53 PLACE PORTLAND OR 97219 28112138- .02800 •003.o••0•e•s••3 ••n LU1 TER,: ST,'EPHAN AND WRXGRT KELL /E 8390 SW COLONY CT TIGARD OR 97223 28.112103 -04600 e...•.e•••ea000 00010 FRAZIER, CHARLES W 14155 SW FANNO `CREEK DR TIGARD OR 97223 2911212 -04800 ur•oe•e8 6460 •• • PAUL, ALEXANDEZ ' °R 'FOR , PAUL FAMILY TRUST 14137 SW FANNO CREEK DR TIGARD OR 97223 25112F0,,050:10 Oaaa. ••3.o•e•3 .33a•e GEIL, CHARI it 8385 SW FANNO CREEK DR TIGARD OR 97223 O • et 0. •.. ^••, ••, ;f « „ «•., ., 251.10#- 02 66 e0 O O 6:e • •ee Orylhee • Y.. M`•• • .O GUYER, KAREN 8355 444 FANNO CRL'EK D>E? TIGActh OR 97223 06 2S11280-45400 seal•.•• es as 00.eero•• RICKMANg RUSSELL J AND LYNN IBS 8325 SW FANNO CREEK DR TIGARD OR 97223 *oleo 251121313- r05600 0be••,be40.00•.•..0bd • HENNESSEY, LEO SIN AND BH R0 8285 8w FANNO CREEK b TIGARD OR 97224 ea•o 251.1285.05 ®O0 •e.ee,.sds•lfaG.se.•s•1 ROh1RTS00 WI1C:LZAM E 82 5 5 5 ►; FNINO CR>ll:'EK DRX 'E TIG�IRI3 CiRf7223 0 2511238- -11800 ai..4•o••• 4004000 IORUD, DANIEL L e,D LAURA K 14103 SW CoLO 's CRE K PLACE TIGARD OR 97224 2S112BU 12O0O . •.•...o• .. •e•.•.' MOHR, JOSEPH T AND MADELINE J 0 14089 SW FANNO CREEK LOOP TIGARD OR 97224 2S112MR -14 200 ..................... SCOTT, RORY T AND WANDA L 14090 SW FANNO CREEK PLACE TIGARD OR 97224 2S1O2DD -00600 ..................... LEASON, EMIL J GERTRUDE 13880 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 2S102DD -00701 .. ... d•. 0• ••ae••e VONHEIDEF'CEN, SVEN & ANNE 13990 SSW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 2S10200 —00803 ......••o••.bd••••vtia�6 D0AS1N. CARL LRE /JENEANE A 139 a5 sw HALL TI!SA'b OR 97223 2S111AA- 00100 •e...o.•e a.. TIGARD, CITY OF 1312.5 3W HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 91223 2S111-00300 .aram0e O' CONNELL, KATHLEEN C 14005 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 2511288 00 460•e000.0.nai.. GRIMM S 1' H 14095 SW FANNO' CREEK PL TIGARD OR 97224 2511J12B11-- 12100 • .. • . • .. HA5Cr , PHILIP J 1& HELEN �C 14078 ' SW FANNO CREEK PL TIGARD OR 97223 2811288 -12900 ........ n � . .. oars • TITAN PROPERTIES CORP PO BOX 6835 ALOHA OR 97007 2S102DD -00700 •0060.4Pii•0•e040•.040 VON 1 EIDEREN, SVE 'f AND , ANNE 13990 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 9722.E 21310215-00802 iaioeoabo. • ds.ro. BOSSHARDT, ARTHUR A 13 916 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 2S102DL-00806 ... .••.e..• •..••.• WHITMAN, WAYS 1 AND BETTY A 8665 SSW MCDONA D TIGARD OR 97223 28111AA'00200 ...e.•.•.•.•..s•os•ie MCKINZ XE, A R DOROTUEA 14075 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97224 iiiio eoms 28111AA -00401 60ee00000eeoo•eo.d•4,, HALL BOULE'/AktD BAPTIST CHURCH PO BOX 230130 T443AAb Ott 07223 2810100 -0:400 ee•awe••d••oeo.s`e 3TARKWEATHER, 'WAN M TRUST S^.ARIATHp2, ROEBRT tal8T BY BROWN, MILTON 0 3o1 NO MURRAY R PORTLAND OR 97229 28111Ak.00S00 *ea— J...4044oa a•u MOORE EROS coNsT rtv0 ANDERSON, RICHARD L AND JAN/CE R 8680 SW MCDONAL[3 TIOAA0 OR 07222 !q n a [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] CA'TY OF TIG IRD PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES DATE: i44 POTEt'IAL APPLICANT: AGEN's oar l►.)%4 i..r�_ tiiC. Phone: Phone; 0,0*- 4•••4 IIMINNIMMINNIMMOMMMINMIIIMILI.OMPIIMMIMMEMMONOOK11% PROPERTY LOCATION ADDRESS: LA- TAX MAP & TAX LOT: - -- ;4EOESSAI'i3Y APPLICATION S) ory Satiltj larousnisiramow mewraeremomowarnein PROPOSY',L Ibi sCRIPTIOl : COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNAN'I'ON ZONING DESIGNATION: NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANI ?° '' ION ONAIRPE aSON z � 1 d ` 0 . PHONE ZONING +)/STRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIRLNENTS Minimum lot eizeA y r eq 4t. Minimum lot width: ft SGtb . ka a front IT ft. side raj ft., rear garage ► ft. corner . ft from both Maximum mite cove a ' 1 % Mit, mum landscaped or natural IP :.. otat on 4xea: Maximum building height ft. ADDIT'I':'NAL LOT Day, 1 SIGNAL REQUIREMENTS n s tnim lot frog Cage: 25 feet unless lot is iwreated through the minoic land p r L 4it ion pr .,ass a Lots' created as part of partition Must ha "pe mi :limum of 15 feet of frcntage or have a minim= . 15 foot wide a cer o element. ax3murn lot depth to width ratio c € 2.5 to 1. ft. atreet°. SPECIAL SETBACKS St eet ±: � ft. f: OAt centerline or E& abl. i.dhe! ai as ®a a rea Lower intensity 2oa ss44• . .7 Ong the site's :. boUndary Flag lot: 10 foot side y a , at$itb tick a Zero lot line lote minimum 10 foot separation between hu3dinga Multi- family residential lbuiiding Separatirtn: See Code Seotio:P, 15.960030. Accessory Structures Up to 528 square feat a ft. ntiniuiurn Setb ck feat aide and rea►v lot Aimee e Acce®eory Etruoture up to 1000 Sq. 2t. on parcels of at, least 2.5 aorta in s See a r"„9 ti . g` s ` µ P .Alit Bite �P13.�:�7.s� ��hin�. ��t�a:o� ®e•��a.Cbc�� for �� utrUctura® d • FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Maximum height of 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones/ 2-1/2 etories Or 35 feet in R-7; A-12, R-25 GT 'R-40 zcns if standards of Code Section 18.98.030(8) are net RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION commutiity Development Code Chapter 18.92 specifies that the net residential units allowed on a particular site way be calculated by dividing the net area of the dtvelopable area by the minimnm number of square feet required per dwelling unit in the applicable zoning district. Net development area ie calculated by subtracting thca following /and area(a) from the sir site area: 1. All sensitIme lande areas - land within the 100 year floodplain - slopes exceeding 25% - drainageways 2. Land dedicated for park purposes 3. Public right-of-way dedicatifi)n 4. 1111 land provided for prive.te otreets (includes acceesways throetgh parking areas) Ti e City of Tigard allows a reeidential density transfer of up to 25% of the units that could otherwise have been developed on sensitive lands areas listed in (1) above to the developable portion of the site in accordance with Code Seotiee 18.92.930. It is the responsibility of the applicant for a residential development application to provide a detailed Calculation for hoth the oermitted residenti61 density and the tensity tranafer. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION Regardless of the allowed hoheing density in a zoning dietriet, any property within 100 feet of a dedignated established area ehall not be developed at a density greater than 125 percent of the Maximum COMprehensiee Plan designation Oot zoning) of the adjacent parcel. REJIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SOLAR ACCESS REQUXREMENTS All subdivisiOns and minor partitlone are aubject to Solar acceos recihiremene Which state that 80% of all lots created must be oriented £�r Solar accesibility. The dheradteridtiCe of a Imlay -oriented let are high levele of wintertime Oun tiltikittt the south Walla and roofs of the house, house orientation Maximizing gOUth WindOW area, and a South-eloping toof Area. To Achieve this, one may utilise the followingti a. Basic requirement: Lots with ...it least a 90 foot north-south lot dimension and a *, 'fit line orientation Within 30 degreeS of an eat-west axis; be Protected Solar luilding Line: The solar building line mUaL a) be oriented Oithin 30 degtees of eaSt -west, b) be a minimulm of 70 feet from the Mtddle of the lot to the south, C) be a minim of 45 feet from the northernMost buildable beundary of tihe agbject lot. • Performance Options: The firdt option reghLree the home to be oriented Within 30 degrees of an eadt -west exit; and have at leant 80% of the ground floor's south wall protecte4 froM shade. The second option requires that i,kt least 32% of the glass and 500 ecidate feet Of tlee re -f area face Soilth and be protected front shade. Page 2 • 41° 411) Total or partial exemption of a site from, the Solar access requirement can be approved for the following reason - Nast, west or north slopes steeper than 20%. - Off-site shade sources (structures, vegetation, topography). on-site ohade sources /4vegetation). AdjustmentS allowing a reduction of the 80% solar lot deeign requirement can be made for the following reasons: - Reduced density or an increasea„cOst of at laaet(five percent due to either: \ * east, west or north elope reater than 10%; * significant natural feature, * existing road or lotting pattern, • public easement Or right-of-way. • Roduction in important develooment amenities. - pro -exi.sting shade (vegetation). 4alos teare required whL AreJMIEDAIOALkttoPhow that the osnt semplips with the solar d.lsils.,..skaildards, or that specific lots should be exempted or adjusted out. The following items shall be included in the analysls: a. The north -sodth lot dimension and front lot line oriontation of each proposed lot; h. Protected solar k)silding lines and relevant building cite restrictions, if applic ble; . For the purpose of identifying trees related to exemption reqUeats, a map showing existing trees at lest 30 Zet tall and over 6 inches diameter at a point 4 foot above grade, including their height, diaMeter, and mPecies# and stating that they are to be retained; and d. Copies of all private restrictions relating to solar access. * * PARKING NNW ACCESS Required automobile parking: VIr dwelling unit. one covered parking space per uuit required -multi family units with more then 2 bedrooms require two parking spaces per unit. 253 of required spaces may be designated Comnact-ioAly Spaces. Standard parking Spade dimensions: 9 ft. X IG ft. Compact parking space dimensiona: 8.5 ft. X 1B ft. Handicapped parking:, A parking tras providing shall Ovide appropriately locittisd and deeignated ha'rtdt lt apped peirkirig eptieaek. The rianimurn nuMber cf handl(' ipped parking epJ3.cea to be provided a.nd parking spaos size are mandaterkby the Amex - '13.-,A401-t47-1117.Miittilfirgiot 03ee handout), A hatadideLPP0d PatitilirliPEIC 13141001 shall be painted, on the parking spa tle striacci and am appropti- Aigri Shall be provided. Bicycle racks are required for lti -family residential developMentra. Bicycle rack N shall be locat Al areae protected from automobile tzaf:fid and in corivenient log All Pak'king ar as and driVeWaya must be Paved. Page 3 - A t", • --'• -• Minimum number of a .oce®ses s Minimum access width.: . .,,_,y. Maximum ac ese width: ,, Pedestrian access must be provided between blinding entrances and parking, areas, ©utc orir common areas and public sidewalks and streets. A minimum of one, tree per severe parking spaces mast be planted in and arou:kd all parking areas in ord. r to provide a canopy attract.; Landscaped screening of parking areas from vie vs from public rights- of-way merit be provided. 'tor ,•detailed information on design requirements £O! parking areas and accesOkkus, see Community Development Code Ch ptern+ 18.106 and 18.108. ireiwirom CLEAR VISION EEA Tiro City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feed: above grade at road /drivivay, road /railroad, and road/road intersections. Tih ► size of the required clear vision area depend.e upon the abutting Street's Functional classification. uF 'i ' Inca AND SCREENINd increase privacy And to reduce or e'. iminatO adverse noise or viaUa1 impacts between ad j aOtarit devolopalente especially between different land . ae, the City regnites landscaped a or er by a .along :certain i a Site Ct vta .icith ,r m of £eqa as must be oocu ate ed by a Mixture of cec iduoue sand P evergreen - . tLcal and re also regained h�+rZ�zont�al: 1,. �ttin ®. 3ite ob�cuxinr d ireena c�t. £ Y x.. . ire and e�hr�ube and Mist ach eve a a �inoe p g d.. Jan ac me oageia a a £ not r�egui °ed# PogU .red buffer area y y pa,- y r _ g may only ' bn: o�Ctg ..��c�l b Yl =., station, �:�ncQe a ut-�.�.itie�, and walkwa r Additional .*AforMatitin on required bnf er area ilateriaLe and gf.zea may be found in bode Chapter 18.100. Regtired buffer widths , app. i Oble your i' 7oporJal area along north ;bounds �..,�.. ;..�: t { t a alon east bound £a, Q .,._ along eoui,.h bou_� A ry. ary in addition p night abet urin a reeni g is required alone Page 4 n/ d LANDSCAPINiC Street 'trcem are required fot all developments private street and for drive; s anor th M� trees must be Placed a it ' within t property within aik f of the t.-o have a minimum Bali ... o inches trees should be space '40 to 40 feet a. Farther infnatiai, on w egulations aft rev ommend a street ;Drees may be Ohta r o • ti ;ing on a Public or feet in ls:a'*ggth. Otreot lia,right-ef-waY or on pr `"rate way boundary. Strf :eat trees must fen feet above grade street rt d,ndin; on mature tree size- eating street ; trees and a lint of nec from the Planning Division. szeNB permitL be Obtained before Greeting awe sign in th a pity of Tigard. A " idelinee ' r ss PerWits°9 handout is availe,1e upon, request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code Standards La y be peirmitted a`,f th sign pro "sal is reviewer as pert of a develop development application. i SE,sz.3 Code Cbaptez . 5.84 provides regulations for lands pottt&ntiaaL1y unsuitable for de ve1opMent due td areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, w ttland areas, on slopes in exoe s of 25 perventq or on unstable ground;. Staff will att6alpt to preliMinarily icdenti.4 seas tine lands areas at the pre -cpplication conference based on availarle information. loweve : the tparoreoilb ilitr to' eciee, '.'v..ident .f" sex a t a lands, a their he e�c. : :.. .is theme. a eepo, l.b litt; ..o the W1 15ant. _ hreah c setir,lor this Jef ions, of onL4.10,M1 1an,Aa E, 't be cd:earl. ngestad a pans. eghm tad with .a .:develo ®rrt, at2plici®rn Chapter 18.84 provider; re mlations for the use, Prot otion4 or modification of sensitive 1eride areas. ResId®►ntiali deVeldPment is flood plain areas to the City for park and o ,an spat.* areas is re • 1 required prohibited within f loud iains,. n most cases, �ed3 cation of � quir+ad a,s' p y - a conditio of approval of , a de 1opment application. Sttia . �I•i. it ,1 / 1 _ 9 1t ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS All 046,163,44#, -40 1441 • ...- .�iw'11�i�l •.. .._ 1�.!.rIMY�ei ....iw�Ew.9 :+ ti Page 5 • • PROccDttitE �,�..:.•,.Finistrative staff review Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public shearing before the Planning Commission. g Commission with the Commission Public hearing endstia nhon ,the to the Cl.ty Council: making a �aacora�► p Another, public hearing is held by the City council. be accepted by a Planning Division Ittaff member at ,al "s applications �ae�B�-, the Community Development Development Department counter at ' City Hall. Applications Submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning ,Division acceptance may be returned. Application® submitted after 4 :30 P.M. ; on Kura day wily, be batched f r processing with the following week's applications for processing. No applications will be accepted afte 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other d ,ye. air sha;kb be folded IN ADVANCE to 8e5 b 11 y� �,1 p I _____-- �,.,.._..,�._._� -, d tar ©i ®ctc shoui,Y�,�t' in�hA3W . Cane. 8 5 ��.1�`�ch ay 1.A. inch tr�ala of a r\ oc , u allated f4 s ttac nt geto tine taf f „tept t or �aa�tni ni trative eapla„on •. The pl nning bivis 3an and 'nginmer:Lna' Division, will do a preliminary xaviel4 of the application w determine whether a n ap a ation is and complete within 10 days of gu mi ttal5taff will notily an applicant if additional information or copies Of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative de bo will occur approximately 45 to 60 days after anapp lication is as, complete by the Planning Divisional ,hpalicaationa involving difficult iaeuee or ,•e firing review by other jux'.gdictionn may take additional time to review. Written a within IO. a of the hearing. i 10 (Aay appeal, period follows all d c sAn appeal on thte Matter would be heard by the '" �n".... -._:, • A ba i . flow diagratt illustrating the review process is available from the planning Division. p � the conference ate intended to inform the prospective applicant - of the primary Commianlit r The pre ap licati.on� ar ®nferena:r� and the aaot��a o Developahe.nt Code requirements applicable to development Of a partionlar- site and to allow the staff and prospective applicant to discte5a the . ... . . ,. , 0 ortunities3 and conetrainte affecting development of tLhe site. The conference and note. ca ir�not cover all Code requirements and aspects of good Site planning that .. y"_ t � .� ... Site pla>r� planning � ' required b the f your a y � shau3.d apply o the develoomeny o y u. Shall not constre of 11 waiver ® the applicable standards or require!msde, a e t i recomrtud� a {° a prospect i'e applicant either robtax x recomm$nded that:: era .a�,� read the Community Development Code , ∎;t atilt any uestione of City staff relative to code regU .rexiients prior to aubm tting /LA ap iicati ®n: r pre application conference is required if @ an applioe ,o is tc be more than six moeths of . ,�notlaer pre-application ma�r�, t'=�r this re ay,, �.icati.�� a" ��fere>rzc ®;; . _ „ ' a y airu�Ling unless the second c ®irnte�eaao;,e is deemed txnnenesear b the pl Division. PREPAREO pLaNti 4" • xvxSxoN I�I3C�N %s �i39.4i7: Page.'6 • e PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre - applicat3 n conference is to: (i) identify () tble Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; ti to provide fit staff an opportunity to comment on a pe cif is concerns and (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant including identifying who will be the final decision maker for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications approved by the a ,ro riate authorit o onm ended by City staff and to be required of the applicant will be re There will be no final qu pp recommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had ase opportunity to review and Oormitent on the application. The following colements , are a projection of public improvement ,re1i tet: requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your project. Ftlq. ha t- of -wav- eledicat3 s The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public to increase abt ting public tights -of -way to the ultimate f:uncti.onal street classif:irat ion rights -of -way width specified by the Community Development Code or to create new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require dedication of right-Of-way foe: Skik) tea o��.� et 2.. from centerline. lily:12A2 to feet from centerline. Street trovementen 1. street improvements 2. will be necessary along____. street improvements will be necessary along 3. Street improvements will incl^ de „� , ,, feet-, of p 1tve ent from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (in mast canes. Alternatively, a fed is collected) , a five- foot wide sidewalk (may be wider on arteriaie or major co1lectoir0), necessary street signs, st ;x'eetlightr , and a two year atreet1igh ins fee. In Some cases whero streci impirovements are not cure deferred. In these ca.. property yawner- (s) must the property owner's right to remono improvement district formed to imp vementa or other necessary public cal, the street ii provements may be a.. 1. 2, 1 0 aPpro' ,1:, the re don ®trance ag r a ent which waives rate against the forma, ves es trianweeeibikeemee e SoinitarI- Sev, re a The closest sanitary .ewer to this proms ;qty e 2 inch 1:i. no located at The proposed; development must be connected to a sanitary n the eWr�Yo��ed deve].o developeres responsibility to extend the sewer aic _ g p P pm Page 7 Water • Sug2l, :. The Provides public orate should be contacted proposed develePment - Water District (Phones 4;',!">1--1,15'161,514 ,service in the area of this site.. The District for information regarding water supply for your re Pra:,tectiOns Tualatin Valley Fie and Rescue Dietrict (Contact: Gene Hirchill 645 -13593 pr6videe fire' e w Pi-tit of T,gard. The 'District' en ould be contacted for L aormation regarding the adequacy of. circulation ayeteme, the head' for fire 'hydrants, other azeetione related to fire protection'.: tither Agency PerMits tCy. ® ®Wer jYCl3�]G'oyewerjj ,; ,,,, „ rn..ai r,w+.w.— 'sn.ew++.at. ✓. wliiwr..'e.�rr,..w++•1'a+i^ "_ .. . _.... .... .:erg ... tip. STORMWATER t atITY FINS . The Unified sewers ge Age�nc gage established alished and the City" has agreed to ce, Resolution ?o. 90 -43, Surface W for Manage tent Rag x16.kione, enfa�ac �e�►ci�.itiee ar fees in re it ng the const u tion of on site water qualii y , � i h ' lieu cf their ction. resolution ,requites that a fee and /or. _ The a The fee i�t yoaseae� �'a conet� rxation of a water quali t ?• facility be built 9 the aanousnt of 9.mpsrvi ®u a aurfaoeg for rnveryr 2640 egnere feet or portion, hOre ? ry the fee shall �'�� a �:. bP '. r✓ f �lte ll.h0$28 ®0.0 T or facility shall, be by.d, ' :..:.- ...,.....Y.•.,.�,:�.,.... TkiATt'k'$C IMPACT 1990, PEE es from new In g��0, 6�aaih:�ngton County adopted a county'�w�i�.e �i °a � Impact caffi4 T aC Fee (TIP) i.11 cols, of f _evelo n1e e ordinance � k,aeecl agora � the a daily to eat �►� pr��jected arn�aact on the Impact p �.uY i transportation s d etetp De 'ra: lo�`i ng properties � requited tb av based on the humbler of trips ' tey ar ®p ro j ect a t qanert t® The i0 cP lculated based on type of use, e e of pro jeCt, and a exa wee based v .culated at time of bui3rlihag permit £e® c€�tee�ory. .. .: _, � ... , ?� . � .. �.o�ied! to �.sa�ua.�.ce. in limited cir ia.ancnLt, paymen� of that TIP Ana ► be allowed • -i1 be deferred unt ,�l ialauance of occu anc pestLt. Deferral of palment it oct upai ty id permissible only when the TIP is ctreater than $6t000.004 STREET OPENING PERMIT until the ap2�ioai�'✓ ..... A.ja..1�,y i e� Jas. r Mc work within a public tight-cf.-way shall coftencc has obtained a street openig0 permit the tl ��,.0 �ercing De aartment. erm3.t fro e•1 1'flISHED FLOOR El EVATI0N� plat. ',d the applicant shat i. ?ubtati t �, Y � gradi g i� ®n all xo-jectstphat requite lt't�.. a P... .` with the at lir plan a t i.cal floor fan fo each lot which shall ve p .. at the the ela�wai:�.�ans of four corneisa� of that lass along ng with olc�v€�tion� a corner of each 16t4 ro: PREAP '.MST page • ENGINEERIINd DIVISION PHONE: 639 -4171 •, ti a 'r Xo Staff _Alit,,..,,.o. Date B ' CITY Of TIGARC9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARThEN " APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are rearuir d for the successful completion of your application submission t a&tirementa. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. Thi :► sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time You submit Your application, See your application for " items or `PP ...�,- or Further explanation of these. items call Planning at 639 -41 r L BASIC MATERIALS A) Application form (1 copy) Owner's signature /written authorization C) Tide transfer instrument 0) Assessor's map E) Plot or site plan F) Applicant's statement (1) Filing fee ($1,5 ,i SPECIFIC MATERIALS IALS s.se --w-i — 5i' -f ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: E t 1 t C 3 C A) Site Informpstion show g, (Wo, of copies ' 1) Vicinity Map 2) Si te size & dimensions 3) Contour lines 2 ft at 0-1O% or 5 ft for grades 3 10t) 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5) Locations of natural hazard areas i.nc 1ud king a31) Floodplain areas b) Slopes In excess of 25% c) Unstable ground d) Areas with high seasonal water table e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential f) Areas having severely weak foundation Cords 6) LocatU,En of resource areas as shown on the prehen ,>,:, Oap inventory including: al Wildlife habitats 4ri), , Wetlands 1)- Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from round level 14) Location of existing structures and their uses s 9) Location and type of on and off site rroa »e s eur�c�� 10) Location of existing Utilities and ease N+ ni s 11) Location of existing dedicated right —of -Was Vii) bite beu'12tr P1►re .3howihg (No. of copies 1) The propo ?.fed site Rnd surrounding proOerties 2) Contour line internals location, , 3 ,� The � o�'s a►'��'� names of all: • sirs dame►�ds� �r std, "ite & o he adjoining sic %lay a1 Existing&platye p :,c and ease ent. on the site joining prJpert'. as APP11CATI( ti -4tCKL lST Page r • '4 • b) Proposed streets or other public ways on the site. c) Alternet_ue routes of dead end oar proposed streets that require future extension The location and dimension oaf a) Entrances and exits on the site Vii) Park:ing and circulation areas c) Lading and services areas d) Pedestrian end bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ►totem drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions Sanitary sewer facilities The location of areas to be landscaped The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10 ) The location of mailboxes lboxes 1 .) The location of all etrua tares and their orientation 12) txisting or propo' ed sewer reimbursement agreements ...tic �) cad in .Plan (!Ua : of copies all inc;iarde a grading plan at The site develo scent plan h g .� p drawings and shall the sarnetnescale �Eoilc�rinathe information: dr ai contain g . 1) The location and extent to which gr^Ading will take : i proposals, and time of year place indicating general contour lines, s? ,;pa ratios and soil stabilization pr p p� it ,l proposed to be done. s pr 2) A statemene from a registered engineer supported by data factual substan� iatotng and er,�tec{�or�acal a) Subsurface exploration g t . en g ineerin report b) The repo b validi 9 of sanitary sewer anJ die.. proposals c ) That problems will be and d how they will be mitigated • Arrchttecture.1 2i^awth of copies The to development peon proposal shall include: 1) Floor plans indicating the Square footage of structures proposed for use Oh—site; and 2) Typi ;al elevation drawings of each st Ucture, easements 7) 8) 0) � )' �.and5cape Pi:an No: the landscape pion 'ha11 be drawn at the sacra scale of tine site ainalys ,s pan ar a 1arg, r scal'� if necessary and shall end �cate . ... �... crap c f t6 . i rri anti n m where. app1i cahle C 3 Locationaaand � tl S � on �y 5 e w g es � .buff e eeo�i.r�gs ' C ers ai�dscr APPLI ATION 01-04 t Page 2 J M r az ) 3) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open spaces ( 3. 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials The landscapu plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. 1 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. 3 ign DrauliOSI Sign drawings shaill be submitted in accordance ,with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development ReW\ew or Prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. Traffic'51,eneratian estimate PrPAiminar artatian ®r lot line ad usiment rya show (o. of C.)ples ,) 1) The owner of the subject parcel E 3 2) The owner's authorized agent ( 3 3) The ma,p (� north scale, ,�a5Q,10�D or 200 feet• -•x�, inch nc� arrow and date 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries [ 3 S t width and names of streets, easements and y, Location, l'i, . other public wnYs within and adjacent to the parcel 1 3 6) Location of all pee anent buildings on and within 25 feet all property courses � � 7 Location and width of al 0) Location of anlY trees with 5 or greater ;clip+ e At 9) All 4 feet above ground level 1 3 10) Lvcationeofgexistinghutilities and utility easements [ 3 ..) 4 . u �r street: 11) For major land partition which creates a p a) The proposed right—of -4 y location and uwidt C 3 b) A tcaned cross—section of the proposed street Plus any reserve strip t 1 '�ns C 3'' 12) Any applicable deed restrictions 13) Evidence . that land partition will not preclude efficient futUra land division where applicable Subdiiision_ PrelimA,nar', Plat Ma a data_snm►win (loo. of 0 Copies ) 1) Scale equaling 30, 50,100 or 200 feet to the inch iiInd . , limited to one phase per sheet 2) The proPosed name o,.. f the sobdii ision 3) Vicinity map showing property's re a te ensh. fp to arterial and collector streets C C 4) Names, addtesses and telepo one ruse e tubers of the owner developer, engineer, sUrve e, . , de s agher, as appl i cablc t 5) Date of application 6) Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided t 7) Names of adliacent subdivision or names Of recorded • ownees of at1jm..in ng parrceis of unsu ivided land " �` i ..... City—established . baile bench 0) Contour ling ro ted to a y tie, mark at . foot .intervals for 0-40% g greater that 1014 1 3 13 9 PLICA" 10N CFHECKLIST -- Pat, e 'qi p. .1, A'• p�. er fin 9) The purpose, l acation, ' ype and ; ,ize all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed / s=,abdividon) a) Public and private right— of -waYs and easements [ b) Public and private smntary and stain: sewer lires � c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants t d) Major power t(Il1ephone t* anslniassian liras (5 g ter) �e�9. ,� ®� volts or rea e) Watercourse f) Deed reseruations for parks, ? ',,pen space, pathways and other land encudnbrane s L 10 ) Approximate plan and prof i le ; of props sed sanitary rid storm sewers with grades a,nd pipe sizes ind sated y .3( 11) Plate of the propoe e ;,zixter distribution system, ohowing pipe sizes and the location of values and fire hydrants. 12 Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets icluding street exten.lions for a reasonable d i sto,nce beyond the l imi. s i. the proposes' subdivision. C ►g a) � r tinns of proposed street right-of—war; [ rO y,l Scaled location of� O 14� The location all areas subject to inrartdatic:n or storm pater overflow 15) Location, WW,dth and d,recti r an of flow of all water-- course$ an4 drainage way; 16) The proposed lot conf i�gura�t'P ns, appr ox mate lot b tl itnens iores and lot numbers. Where 10 s are to be Used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated .upon such lots 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or at 4 feet above ground el,, and g dl d lei treater measu �e the location, of proposed tree plantings, if any ) The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present ies of the structures, and a statement of which structures �n are to remain after platting /9) supp,lwtental inf,Irnation '�nc Udin a) Proposed deed . restrictions� (if any) . b) Proof of property ownershtp . r t 3 c) A proposed pu iv n for provision of subd s!-)n improvements 20) Existing natural ., ., rat u.r a l features includ'Ag roc k cUt- croppngs, wetlands rs and marsh areas, .. 21) If any of the foregoing • information cannot practicably i Plat, it shall be he shown on ��ie p�^elim►i�rary P r or^porated into a narrative and ;■r,,bM1tted With the a op1ication: 3') Other Information S6W l el. ..... � r.,.• ww. w.. uv.,.. w...w.wrw..,�...�.w...�w,,,u ,..w,+.ai:rw.f r.w ...r.,..,..,.�fr 4 - ��,/"' (23621P/0028P) APPLICATION i ! A!�' " � ��' tLlT ate • • 4.; FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE a SUM ktIS XON StD3 '�1 p 04 RNS/Tx i a: _ agriV I°I ..VIY mj ' (NPO #S) The applicant requesie Subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide a parcel of approximately, 1.69 acres into nine lots) raa .ging between 5,000 and 11,$,850 square feet in eiZta A Sensitive Land approval i® requested to allow a ground disturbance of appeoximate y 30 to 35 cubic yards in wetland. APPLICABLE REVIM CRITERIA: Community Development codes Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.88, 18.32, 18.102, 18.138, 18.114, 18.1500 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehen sive ;Warn PoIiciee 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: 14010 8W Hall Boulevard (WCTM 2L t 12B8, tax lot 200) ZONE: E--,1 yPeeideutiaal,•; 7 units/acre) The R-7 zone allows single fami`y attached or detached r- ®idential unit®, duplexes, public sin, sport facilities, farming, manufacturel, harea, how occupation s, fa lily 'day care, and wee = Sory at ctaar en am :Mg oth. r us cs Attached is the Site Plank and applicant's ^statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agek°ar.iee and from o;::,her information availabl to our staff„ a reps rt ,::rd recommendation will be preprar d and a decision will be rendered 'On the proposal in the neer ;suture. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your memento by ': a. 0, 1993. You may upe the space provided below or attach a separate latter to return your comments. I ,pu are unable to nee and b the above dates please phone the staff ribItitact noted below with your co fY1ente 4and confirm yot,vr comments in writing ma eci; xn a e vaesible. If you have any questions regarding ;.lie matter, corataCt the Tigard Planning 3® P artme nt, P® Box 23397s 1.3125 «W Hall Tigard, OR 87223„ PHONE : 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomero PUASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 'Moe have reviewed the proposal and - have no objections to it r �ticag�s t Please contact of our office. Please r-: f et to th a enaloeed letter. Written Comments: Phone Number: NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS NFO HO. .l opie s CITY DEPART M97 4/13Uilding Official /Brad R. ...'..... QY Recorder _,ti,s Engin Bring /Obris D. pezanite CO ordi»ator/Viola O. OPECIAL DIME Fire District (Pick -up box) 404 ke 6 Rcerre ation Board ice field Operations School Diet Mo. 46 —"® (Beaverton) 0'Oy Pab . PO Box 8 n, OR 97075 School Diet. 233 (Tigard) 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 _igard Water bl.otrict 0777 OW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 9.i123 Tualatin Malloy Water District `°"'r' 6501 SW Taylors Ferry ltd. Tigard, OR 97223 3. XFFECTED JURISDICTION Waah. Co. Land Use a 5ranap. 150 11. First ;Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Anent Curtis - Kov1a Martin Joann Rice izott Ring • Fed Eberle - Mike Borreoeon smosommis City of Beaverton .- 71.4 Hendryx FO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 970 City of king City city Manager 15300 SW 116th Xing City, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego - City Hanger 300 Lpk?0swego, OR 97034 State Highway Divioion - Bob Paean PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225 -0412 Boundary CoaxmisOian _ 320 MW Stark Room 530 Portland, OE 97204 METRO 2000 Sid let ave. Portland, OR 97201 -5398 O `CPA's only) `"-""- 1175 Court St. NE once!, OR 97' \.0.05590 Other City of Durham City Manager 11140 SW capper b ones Tigard, OR 97224 5. SPECIAL 3 City of Cortland Planning Director 1120 8W 5th Portland, OR 97204 070T '" Lidwien Rebmann 9002 8E McLoughlin Blv' Milwaukie, OR 97222 Faa"l:ry Rd. cos General Telephone Ruse ells 1 0 SW Main ,St. gard, OR 9 ?223 t/ NW cott Pat1 gas — Tear 220 NW Second Ave. Portland, OR 97209 TCI 'Cablerviei0n of Oregon Mike Haallodk 3500 SW Bond St. Portlanru OR 97201 Colg bla Cable (Frank $tone) 14200 SW Brigadbon et. Beaverton, OR 97005 6. STATE AtCIT'? ......`.. A.erOflaut"a. Gi,, . ) 4T) Portland General Elec. rriaca Mores 146 5 OW Old 30B011a Fry. cation, OR 97007 if Matte Area Coanaunications Jaeeon DeWitt 8in 1W Oaks 169th Plae 8 16020 Center Beaverton, OR 97006.43`86 u8 woot Mato 1elan1 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 97204 Engineer Beard of fe� `Fish 6 rpilda ", Parke 6 1cecf:e:at.L oiv. ouliet,Aoion suparvioor bopt. of Ba ergy Dept. eef Envfron. Quality 7:::i ivinion of State Lands Co rce Dept. - M.H. i 14 Park FEDERAL A01NCIE8 Poet O fii`Gnginiaaaare tOTHER dazuthern Pacific Transportation ,Company DNine Mi. Forney, Pngin0e0ae. 000 NO 6th Al , nue, R. 324, Uni ®n Station P ®rtl. td, OR 97209 ......,. LODO _pod . 7-7 Fire MOrehall Other [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]