The URL can be used to link to this page

SUB1992-00009POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. iy 1 7M a T rT VAI 92-001 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION / VAR 92-0017 'ILE, TITLE: STARLING / EDWARDS APPLICANT: Dr. Carlos Starling e: \0 Roger Edwards 4500 SW Kruse Way One, #180 Lake Oswego, OR .0.700.31:,, /105% OWNER: Dr. Carlos St'., rliar ►q 15962 Boones Verry Rd Lake Oswego,, OR 97035 REQUEST: Applicant requests approv. -1 of the following development applications: 1) Subdivision approval to divide a pare l consisting of approximately 1.55 acres nto 11, lots betwee approximately 4,050 and 7,250 Square 2 ) Variancenapprovc1 to allow development of a cul -do ac local street to exceed 400 feet rah reap =: Code Section -- de -eac length of 400° 18.164.030(K) allows a maxim= e:ul feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Cp =Mere 18.54, 18.88, 18.100, 18.102, 8 18.150, 18.160, /8.164. LOCATION: 14500 SW Hall R1v, , (WCTM 281 12BC, tax lot 1600) ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre) The R12 zoning' allows single family attachoh ,®detached residential unite, multiple- family residential unite, residential car facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day _ care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank and accessory structures. NPO NO: 5 NPO CHAIRPERSON: Craig Hopkins PHONE NUMBER: 639 -5s2: CHECE ALL WHICH APPLY: iTAPF DECISION GQMMEhT _po_ ACK TO STAFF ON ,,�,...., PLANNING COMMISSION X HEARINGS OFFICER ER CITY COUNCIL DATE OP NEARING: DATE OF RING: DATE OF HEARING: ATTACHMENTS X VICINITY MAP L _ NARRATIVE i SITE PLAN LANDSCAPING PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN .� OTHER: GRAOINC pLlIN STAFF CONTACT + ; y Oi fer = _. !3, v.c 0 ' r; REDO AMANALIPMAYABALM CITY OF TIGS, 13125 SW Hall, P® Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 1. GENERAL INFO PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION S.E. corner of S.W. Bonita Road and S.W. Hall Blvd. TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. ,._.. Map 2S1 1213C Lot 1600 SITE SIZE 1.55 Acres PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER * Dr. Carlos Starling ADDRESS CITY Lakes go, OR APPLICANT* same as owner ADDRESS _ _ PONE CITY ZIP *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a 1es.eee in possession with written authorization from the one ,with written oath orizati,�n. The owner(s) must e o sign this the owner or an agent of t app 4 in the space provided on page two or l..cati(ir` submit a >iritteu authorization with this application. 15962 Boones Ferry Rd. PHONE 636 -8133 ZIP 97035 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request permission to divide a 1.55 Acres Total. ,Ara) parcel into cos between (number of lots) 4050 and 7250 square feet in viz. ?Ao`-':71-"AA IY41A-1, Ziop 0520P/13P Revd: 3/88 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO OTHER CASE NO'so ay. RECEIPT V J g APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Application elements submitted. (A) Application form (1) (B) Owner's signature /written authorization C) Title transfer instrument: (1' X (D) Assessor's map (1) (E) Preliminary Plat (pre -app checklist) X (P) Applicant's atateV,ani (pre --app checklist) (0) BEIM a �'d ti --.(t) X (N) Filing fee (t415 plus 5 per let 4" mb DATE DETERMINED TO EE COMPr. ETE m ' FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: C MP. PLAN /ZONDESIGNATION: N.P.O. Numnber. �..� Prelit.ary plat APProval Date g Final ,Approval. live* Planaitg Engineering . List any variance, Planed Developmes t, Sensitive Landk, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this app icaation p .� ^ • Applicants: To have a complete app1ilcatioti " ou r ill to,ted to tilubit attachments . described in the attached information etJ et at the t ,me you submit this application. • THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: `'�ue3 1.1Lolaa�te an " dee l res t ti is that may A. above re ua t dose not v��arwom�+a4,Wwvw/�"'r�b t Dana attached to or im ®8ed n J e su b e6ro P: d . if the application is grated, the app1icent will ezetc:; se the rights granted in accord ,w nce with the terms and euhje .t to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. . All of the above statements and tha e statements in the plot pl;R, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith9` are true: and the applicants so acknowl edge d on thin pF?' that �san�, permit issued, baaa�e application may be :evoked if it is found that any such statements are false. pp eats of the application including � « has read the entire contents The applicant the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements to aapproviag or denying the application. j , .. DATED this dad o f 19 .��. - - ill' c SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and aift ) of t he subject Property. (h'L:pm /052OP) 47' "ro'''c 1C "� ALPTIA. 67,304tEid,RING INC. ENGINEERING 4 DEVELOPMENT S VICES A SURVEYING PROPOSED STARLINGS CROSSX 'G APPLICANTS STATENSIn 11 lot r ubdiVieion on 1.65 acres. Site: Underdeveloped Property southeast : o the intersection S.W. hall houlevard and, 'S e W , Bonita crest of ' Getty o s Emerald Acres E tat0E" and forth of "hornbook Pork". S,W. ,hall houlev i rd is a State E ghw y, while S.W. Bonita Road is a city street. MAR: WCTM 2$1 12BC Tax Lot: Tai; Lot 1600 O t: Dr. Carlos Starling d o Roger Edwards 4500 ' SW Kruse Way dine, suite 180 Lake Oswego, OE 97223 PSIrI Rig g Dr. Carlos Starlit c/o Roger Edwards 4500 SW Xruse Way ()stet Suite 100 Lake Oswego, OR 07223 ?a 9Ci R.n . per 12 - 12 �1`��'6�$ 3,050 nquare feobt iniMulD i lot Sige Reggittlg 11 tots on 1.55 atlree Calculations: Total Oroge Total Net Developable )*reag Allowed Units: 530900 Sr - 30 0. Proposed Units PLAZA. WEST A Stint 230 9600 A PORTLAND) 0 t EC0 N � -8003, � � ' i 12 . , tree Iu Acmes ; he. .2e - Hof ;th (S..0ite , :and' , j,I.- di �� looa on tree �.nter eo io ► n t ll a�� pr apo; +ed' aoces i;.o the ddve10 nien�t , ;w l ;cot fro the east via S.W. '83,d Co in w '�.c ?? ','goes rough , #� y 'I ra1.d 'Acres: Fett &es" S.W. ;83rd Court' 1w41, e" extended 'inn ;,a cut a -giat. Bee*, q ?ia ..o th n t r' of t e erg var ranc e s reg„u .(ei " ". � e#' .1t;i : d w 3$t4 1 .164. C30.I) A &1i .onaU . , ,',an �► a to o ro .. ,,, r. :1 , OniGVat i nO � c'o em ed' by the State ' ig Wa { DepOr e t nndit Staff furthr li i ti.n , the ,. QtOntia1 for street' aooeas: „1 niter` Sewer: an a ewer be extended into, \ ite via S. .' 83rd Court. Storm Drainage: Drainage will be directed to . exiting systems in S. '. onita go Water W .ter is available from existing line in S .W. Jr 8 our proposed Loaf 1 -4 and 8'11 will meet the b;gtid requirements described in Code Section 1,8.66.040C(1). An adjustment to the design standard .8 requested for that area proposed as tots 5...7. Th18 8C1jatattgent requested consistent Section 18 88 O4OEa d id. j''`. he site has only consistent �i doe east -west goad opportunity, that being S.W. 83rd Court” , Because . City and State are not repo endin, S. W. 83rd Court go through to S.W. . W. Ball Boulevard, that one road opportunity is eliminated. Lots -7 are therefore impacted. ► summary, 8 of the 12 lots or 73% comply with ball regUiremente. , It is requested that the area ;: ' proposed as Lott scal not be nO uded in that are0.1. , necessary to meet basic! requivoilents for the i a o'vo Stated reasons PLAZA ' WEST SUITE 230 9600 S'.'' ,` `OA `POP. 1,4 D 0 E ��ccH BASIC REQUIREMENT LOTS S SOLiVit ELIO L LINE •.OYS • N N •o.e—oCa � H.a{ p0: ..........—r- QT f _ - LNYiitHN•N IMAM i[Haf•rMeMieS.C. S S• MNNtN w « «pN••••M .aeMsme* ••••••••••••MMILN N if 0 : : - - - d ,.. 111M11111111 ._ _. aIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIINIRS . ..., __. a .fiH•. = •• . .H•NH.NH..i.iM..H.HNHftq.HNNMH; • •••••••L•••••••••••••• ••••••••■fH..Mt••. -. f fi. pNN{ N .NnOHANHfHN•aaNCNN•N..pH•WifNM. _ _ • •pi•iNte[{H.••tittlCN••N• N N].tl.pifMNtf1[•.fNH "•..GID.NH.•.i•[NCiN.CN. : : MqH•• 111110111111111 _ _... imp. - _ MOM. N•••N.sme••i.H.N• .... •.am • •N.NtNNH•.•NH•MN.• Mee .HH..N•Nf.•NHH.f'•H•fiH N N1N•••••••MMM.NN•N.•. m 111111111111110111 - - . •••••• N • «assmmiNM•N•••ms . •+ •H•M.•.Yf.•MN•H••coM M••••N••iNNH «NN•••Im 111111111111101111111111111111 I IllagllIlliaMIMIIIMI-- 0 01111111111111111 -. 101011101111111.1111111111 ' 'OIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIMIIIIAIIMNINIOIII -------- SOLAR LOTS ® L LOTS nEE9tNG S€ URBUILDING LINE a a - ■ L LOT S EX /AM i ©FOA CAUSE 0 _ NOT _ those exempted under ZS56 exemption standard. .»..NH..MHiNNp...N NHHN,N..N.aeH..N...• «. . ... ,., »...:.H. . ..• N««i ••• ..• «.....».....NNHHNN «...•••••s ,N.{•••.«N. e• Even tots Wtii 1 IIf6 VxCtI4j7fv•o ac••iaa Z g 8 PR PERTY P PREPARED ray CH1C,t GO TITLE INV.) NCE COMPANY Prepared for ROGER EDWARD$ / MARY PORTLOCK EQUITY GROUP 4500 KRUSE WAY LAKE OSW GO 7124/92 Date Prepared SEE ATTACHED ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND THE FOLLOWING CUSTOMER SERVICE INFORMATION: • TAX PRINTOUT The information on the attached printout is limited to records provided by The Assessment & Taxation Depts. of Multnomah, Clackamas & Washington Counties. ▪ MAP • LAST SALE OF RECORD O OTHER WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington Square :. .684-4404 Early BI rd ..:....... 620 -6011 MULTNOM 11 COUNTY Portland , , , ... :... . 225-1005 Early Bird .....:. + 243.1100 CLACKAMAS COUNTY Milwaukia , + ..:: 653 -73(X) Early Bird, . , a ▪ .. — 653 -7330 CLANK COUNTY Vancouver 516- 0551 From Portland < , . ▪ . , .283-3390 This title information has been 9uvnished, Without charge, in conformance with the guidaiines app'oved t y the o : s .. �1 wis : this service is State of Oregon insurance C®rrrmissionor. The ��sc �arrinit��te ` �±s�® orrautbenefitinr� rrte�rne�ia�ps will riot be designed to benefit the ultiiniate insureds: liability any g permitted, .paid services may be di„ continued, No liabilit is assured for an errors in this report APPLICANT: PROPERTY ADDRESS: zaw in TAX MAP E TAX LOT: f a9 NECESSARY , PLICAT 'OEI(S) P b. a.,1%/blOvw COMPREHENSrVE Pte` DESIGN. I(Z: ZONING DESI ATIO : w PLANNING ORGANIZATION # 2 , CHAIRPERSON: 'a PHONE: y..t ZONING DISTRICT DIMENE/ONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: adMOsq. ft. Minimum lot width: mC ft. Setbacks: ks: front- ft. aide-loll ft., rear421 ft. garage - AO ft. coy aa»3:1 X12,. ft. f both streets. l a ximmm ite coverage: gat Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: Maximum building heights ADDITIONAL mil' DIMENSIONAL REQ.j!RF M ,Minimmi lot frontages 25 feet: unless lot s created through the minor land ° .. tots created as part of a gartiti >n r►auet hate a �.t�.ara process. taxa:atm of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wade aecees eaemeaat. Maximum m lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. SPECK EETBA Streets: ft, from centerline ne o 4/5' o Ejtabli®hes « .mss•:, boundary ry Acce. e rust I ee $ t setback ft. w Accessory ®ft. ride �`� a 520 coq.. in sine ft. 'Setback ck fr aide and rear lot 1121eai 4 S �#ccedaa ®r-y = �t�ctaareas up to 1000 ®q. ft. (whee liowed) ee applicalble zoning d.Letriet eetbacke Zero lot line lots: aa Ylr m 10 foot separation betweent aild i ng Multi-family residential hu1ldlu g separations See Code Section 1.96.0O w a ! r -' i" a'� \e} tr ,'� (m db ,.. ��' .Ai� K�. Y11�+r ^Y M f"a "r '�," .., eLl SPECIAL BUILOINft HEIGHT PROVISIONS nag Lots: Maximum height of 1 -1`2 istor iea or 25 ft., whichever La lee in most zone ; 2 -1/2 ; tortes or 35 ft. in R -7, R-12, ' R-'25 or R-40 zones if sataandar6e of Code affection 111.98.030(S) (S) a are met. Building !Wight Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020) : Bui1dinees located in a - esidential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: non-residential 1. A mink= y (building ,flour ar z a to site area atio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will be at leant 1/2 the building's height; and 3. The structure will not abut a residential one district MIDEMIAL DENSITY °r.ioN Community Development Code Chapter 18.92 a peeeifiea that the net residential units allowed on a particular site taw be ca..culateed by dividing the net area of that d velopable area by the tc.iniesee number of square feet required per dwelling unit in the applicable a .,-s,aaa ng d strict. Net develoe ent are is calculated by subtracting the s o1.1c- ii;'ng land area (e) f'row the gross ite area: 1. All sensitive lands areas land within the 100 year f loodplain slope s exce = ding 25 - draainaagewayss> 2. Land dedicated for park purees '. 3 Public right,-of-way { edicati.on r private etr = etc (includes ace = auways 4. �i11 land '�a�i°�ea3 f :� All parking areas) The City of Tigard alr e • a residential . densitytrans transfer of p t 25% of the unite that could otherwise have been developed lande are s 1&Te� in ( ) above t the developable portion of the site �x accordance w4th Code Section 18.92.030. ....)k_app It is th e reeponailibil. &ty of the applicant foe a residential development li,caatiora to provide a det = Lied calculations for permitted residential density and density transfer. .,., ••• ...r.. RESIDENTIAL DI MONT SOLAR ACCESS. REQUIREMENTS , ffectiti a May , 1991 all subdivisions, aun it Miner p itions�s area Subject to y solar accede reqainemente which state hat 80% Of all late developed iaatst bey delareetionted. The thatacteeietice of a eolareorionted lot are high iseirin eolith windetar „ .. a WI a ssso> th--el tipin ; roo 1evelitt of o a nter i x sun att ilt:Le the south walls and roof, a of the roo houss¢� e�r�. g are To achieve thiss, one *ay utilize the folle iIitiga 10 W' sLLc requirement: Deci.gn a lot *Lth at least 90 feet Of aaO hhaouth lat di aeneion 'and att, orientation within 30 degrees of south, e Protected Solar Bu s as: ieg LLtiet The eolar buildiapg line day* a) I've oriented within 30 degreeed of eolith, b) Mete have a ataLuiraum oit 70 feedot Iktetween it an(' the oiddle of the tr t to the Soutih® 0) have a eat o of. 4a feet betraee�s�°e it arse the �amrt.�ac�rsst �;itxildaab].e bouudary. cif the lot Oa �,<e building l,i ne in located. .. + . �, a to be pe�rf ®ance�h ®,ptie�ns�. W .. _ _ ;,thin 30 de � reee of au at- at •assrie . and have at leaasst onr iesrsated tv�ig 9 ,� 00% of ' the round floor south Walt rote ed £foss :,shade b The ,,second • h Pa c (e ee. IL Y�. option requires at 1; -asst 32% of the glass and '500 'square feet of the roof area to face south and be protected from shade. Total p a site from th aclar access requirement can be for the following a��n a • E et, west or not slopes) steeper than 20 %. 2 off -site shade sources (structures, vegetation, L oograaphy) 3 on -site sak.ade aourcea (vegetation) Adjustment = allowing reduction a the 80 s solar l.t % design gn requ re '.ent can • or the following resonssns: 1 Reduced density or an inc .easaed coat of at least: five peraet t due to .. av ast, west or north, slope greater than 10 %, significant natural feature, - existing road or lotting pattes:a, - 2 public i port: right-of-way. . Reduction in x t deveilopeont :. menit ies a r Pre-existing shade (vegetation) laps and text sufficient to show the development complies with the solar (A(..... desia n standard, except .for lots foo which an exemption or adjustment Le required, including all of the following item 1. The north-south lot dimension and front lot line orientation of each . proposed d '.® ssolaar buildiv g lines and relevant building Elite re = •trictions, it p p p;Lica l 3. showing ess:i ®tin ®tr trees least r 3® frdlYt section F, a Snap identifying . g g f tall and over 6 inched ▪ diameter at a point 4 feet aabol a grade, including their height c diameter and species, and statin4; that they are to be retained and ▪ are exempt. e 4. Copies of all private restrictions relating to solar aacceeas If an exemption or adjustment is reeled: aid® ,teapEs and text of f icient to show that given lot or areas in th development comply with the standards for such an exemption or ,. 8 jtu3tment ehaa /1 be submitted. pa sIDENTUL DENSITY TR Regardlents of t property within 100 developed at a d OOMpreliepsive Plan PARKING AND ACCESS F4 , , _ . red utouvehile parking for this type of IMO: o 0 Secondary w3e required parking: ,,...�..,..._.r . ., . 01s:,�. ...,m.. ; cee may + be d a , c adt oatY spaces. ace dimensional 16 spice dl,nsi.ossn ®>sR S ft. X 1 5 ft IT _. ON a a .._. housing density in a eat of a designated esta bi sity greater than 126 pe esaigrnation (not zo Lug) of th, Handicapped - k Ong a Ala parking area roiV required aut arking spaces shall; pro i d A ' designated haund A parking spaces'. The P 'g L� ce tsetse of fi»vaai a ately lated and 911401 number of handicapped w�4 -. '�%�...%`�'�':. Y1 •i `:.•_ a0. ` o`t• ei .yw� ri,r I•r;!�i i _�yw., ;A,.� yi r C� `� A _ t w:, r,r a. oe C." narking spaces to k pr Oregon i vieod atute symbol shall be sign shall be proms . vide= -dad parking space see handout) . on the parking space ?,icycle racks are requir commercial uses, and in parking spaces. lei` bicycle rack space iodated in areas prot can provide apecifica • • ze air' :muldated by the andiea Parking space an• • an appropriate for ivle uses, atrial us ; a providing 15 or more, automobile e parking :„ ®t.,.be provided at a ratio of one 15 auto par g spaces. R cycle racks shall ' be ed em nut bile traffic. The Planning` Division one for a roved bLc le rack types • n©n- residentiaal uses* ..1bf All parking areas and driveways must be paved. Drive -in use queuing _areas :�„ Minimum number of a cceeee minimum access width: Maximum access width: rievesmeorommarmammorom Pedestrian access must • ••vdad betas building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. For detailed ijformation on design r accesses,, see Community Development !' , ire rents for parking areas and e 'Chapters 18.106 and 1.8.108. CLEAR VISION The City requires e t t le clear be matntatned between amie e ' andei ht feat above d road/driveway, road /aailroad, d road/road ihtersections in specified clear vision areas. The size of the requires clear viaicn area dependaf upon the abutting street's functional c ,aaesifiCaticon. LANDSCAPING Street trees are r t iced private street o a driveway must be plac either withi property wit ,...n sins f suet of th have a min trees skao , d � caliper �� t spaced 20 134 Further I. formation r oral roes may 4• r recommende ro cs a all developwente fronting on a klublic or re than 100 feet in length. Strdet trees the public..-- rigti of nay or o sigh . way boundary. St tedmel tins es at f our feet grade. str feet apart depending mature vs ' ions affecting street obtained from tha Planning Di vi eisun. V • A minimuni of one tree per even parking spaces must be Pleat, in and aroa nd parking areas in. o den' to provides a canopy effect. andeca 1, screening of parking aare r from vie is from public ri.ghta aasf macs provided ..ate...,---M:i Page ,4 4' • BUTTERING ?AID SCREENING Xn order to increase pr vaacy and to reduce or eliminate adverse noiae , or visual ',impacta between adjacent developments, especially betv:: a different land uses, the City requires la ndsca buffer„ ; areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are de scribi' 1 by the ' Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be ecoUpied by a. a facture . of d c duouf and evergreen trees and nl a Site 'obscuring gCreene or Dances are also required in ec eased, and .often are ' advisable even if not required. Required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, ut 1�.tie , and `sidewalks. Additio.hdl informatton 8 � d a mater ials and site s may found in Code Chapter buffer la Division bov landscaping rA� bx ering. a x •ire+ Iniffer Widths appl$. able to your iwoposeal aareat hc, at lo n g ` ndary f a . along ong etast bo u dary i`t o � .. ,:w:. ft. *long south Soutar► �, _,. ft. S long �0t, bound, , re ti o In a�e3a ition aG lht obscuring. screenin te, is alos g f SIGNS pernita Matt be obtainar before erecting ask sigge in the Olty of ig►ard tor hdd .tioa asl sign area ec hei ht below! and Cede Btaaandaarde lma. ttt d i. h, . at an cas� ®� atwa '9 ta i ash past of S. er�tilopaae0t aptallo -.tLou4 the e►i iqa r saa�l is red► SENSITIVE - BIDS ai Mt. ,likDDITIONAL IsLANNIVO 4*MicIERNS OR Ca/Wg TS, 1,. V le 1 6raf�wr�e�; i PROCEDURE Administrative t taf f review. Lng before the land use hearings officer. ..� P1ic hca�,. Public hearing Plannina Commission( Public hearing before the Planning Commisdion with the Con aissfon to Council. inak hg a recommendation on the proposal �,o_ the City Co F Another public hearing is klld by the City. Council. .7111:1 applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff der at the Community Development Department counter at City Ball.. APplioationl submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without planning Division Applications submitted after 4 :30 P.M. on acceptance may b� returned. week's batched ffck precesni ng • with the following Thursday will be bat�c applications cations for processing., Pt � ce � after 3:00 p g �o an lcations �►i�, Oft Fridays or 4:30 on other days. ec o y with an application shall be folded in advance to 8.5 b', 11 Maps aa��dl-„�sittt�t': Inched. one 0.t, inch by 11 inch nap of a proposed project should be e decision. e�ttel! ,.or attachment to the staff report or a�i.Aiatratl.�r Division and Engin _ ®rte Division will an a preliminary The Planning t application and will deteraxaine whether application is complete within will materials applicant li cant if iee of the sub itt � bin 10 days eulaasittal staff '� notify an a are o,ed additional information The administrative decision/Public beat,rin4 typically will occur 3�Aierrsaai�ive aecis.® x approximately 46 to 60 days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning ; Diviaaioa. Applications' i.noolving difficult issues or requiring review by other jeatri sdictions; may ,t ` additional tine to review. Written decisions are issued within 10 drays of the hearing. A10 day appeal period follows 11 decision]. Ant appeal on this anatter would be heard by the _ ) (1. l (. 4 baeic flow diagram illustrating. the review . .. the a3ti»t.. . process is aa�vail,a9rle frown Planning DlviasiOne 8r- _,. .., pre-application the conference � + , � 1 ®f the printery +'s""�°"" �e i°he pre -app and the notes; of the conference ar pect applicant P y intended' t ®..��,�� Tthe p�roan �i'va appl _„ x. _.. P . ` caitiar Development Cade re ni.r mentfs aapplii can l a p ® '.. ' applicable tir�� applicant to ds.ar,: D� the ® e and to a11ow the staff _ p . ,. . _� � The o rtunitie® and c ,►netrainta affecting devel ant of the site. conference and uoteri� cannot cover all Code req+�x�uts and aspects of y y . plan. good 1d apply ta;a the Bevel � nt o£ our site . c planning eheaeaa the Code sham,, aid fl a etof the staff tO pro Tide any nfara ties re ir'ed by Vii► Failur not corgi titute a w,d:iver of the al9litable standards at rintatementd. it , is raaendeL that a prospective ti�� a pp 1ic�t eit Ner obtain and r ad the community bavetr ' pnt Code or as an y queatihns of Ci t y e.at aff relative to � Code requirements prior to Submitting aft application. Another pree ap Al:icati oa n f an a~app ioa�tion Le to be theta eiic ® s aster i t , applicatie c®nfe> submitted more ace,` unload the second casnfexe nc4 id. deemed unnet a oaasy hY the Piannn ag Div etOn9 PREPARED BY: PLANNING D SION Po: 539 - 4111 p+nge 6 PUBLIC FZCTLI' 'IES The pulse of the pre- application confcaren a i® oz (L) identif3 applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and orAinance provisioner (ii) to . provide City staff an opportunity to comment on sp!cific concerns; and iii. to review the application cat on review process \Ssith the applicant including identifying the be the final. decision ►per f ®�. t application. The extent of public 3.mProvnmerte . and dedications to be rehired of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and approved by the appropriate authority. There will be no „final recommendation to the decision ma'lcer by City staff until all commenting agencies, City staff and the publ c have had an opportunity to review and ccmment on the pp The following comments are a projection of public an l��r�.�y��ia improve 'gent related requirements that may be requires has a , condition of devel.gpament .:,pproval for your project. BjeLat-Of--W3. dedicationg The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights -of, -way to the ultimate functional street classification rights- of-way v./0th specified by the Community Development Code. Approval of a development application dedication of right -of -way for 1.C. t 2„ Drier 5-fr street . i i, axove ants z 1. for this its ,Ii111 require feet from centerline. t feet from centerlin a =b fco° ,i ,o» et,. 'CRP�at improvements will be necessary along � � '� � ,,, 1zia a necessary along 2. street improvements will be feet of Pavement �� street imp�"ovesnente will include ,,. 6 from centerline, curb and g*tittere, atOrtil sewers, a .five -foot wide sidewalk, necessary etree, digit ., streetlights, and a 'WO year treetlightin9 fee. C)" niCr DOT. In some cases where street improvements are not currently pr deferred. In se canes, as a c p. (.) must a n the ;fro rt Ownets e right ht to rem ,1 improvement af ed to oWt rovefl ent® or tics', the s:. e ndittcn _' of n-remonstrance trate against t cam , 1 I. 1. necessary pIbl, .c oventa may be ,: roval, the Bement which waived formation of a local 2. Peden trianWays,®b3.keLa sanitary , sewers: The close ar .. o . property � o s a til i 9 :�� a�rn � sewer to this . ,. .... inch line located - • develop lent must be extend to to a sanitary sewer. It is the neloper'a reepon€3ibility sewer along the p�' opo3 deve1 .... t site d sewer _ 3 iarc►!ieAaento a Paeg, 111,' Water se221 The t,, :provided public water service rice in the sasbou14 be contacted for information proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fir • and ResOue District trict (Contsct: Gene :dater District (Phone: t77 4 area of this site., The District regarding water supply .for your .. s within y of � should bo fire protection ss�er'v°icsg Tigard. TheS Dim rict provided fir contacted for information regarding the adequacy ion systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other . dle acy of circulation questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: TRAFFIC TIM FEES In August, 1990, the Washin gton County Hosrd COOkatssiOnete adOptod the county-wide Traffic Im a Fee (TIF) Ordi ce and r ®Bars hneffiAuro the Washington County voters. In September, the Washington connty 1ectorate overwhelmingly approved and3ng tia> TIF , psogram through out tys This action planed into effect an aa3.1. uriadictions «��itl�,£u>i- the cou n the developstient i n Washington c� Olt development fees On all, n County. Tletree Y of Tigard had adopted th county4 s prograua. will. colitct feed from niew level. , nt The city Traffic �,utpact f'ee g�,ocira�a� J _ y _�em. based on then develop aitt' c prajected on the trans lat: tatiin s & re stied aai ll. Rye requi ed to pay based on the number of i pe Developing ]� � the. - are' ro ectaeil to generate., The TIP is calculatecd bastsed on 'ty f.l Of -size of __oj g and a general. use based fee sate dory. ° i* Tll einae 3P p � �1 be calculated at time Of build': perait issuance. In g � � d®ferred until •. a" Rent of the TIF may flowed to bo �ircutm+s4�arrlcee, p ,Y� " .. payment uaat�.l ebc��upan ie t• Deferral. Of p l ®sauanCa� of cccupanc:y g�a�i. permssle only when the TIF is gteater thasl,, $50000.00. STOFtMMWmg. QUTTottY FEES s aecl and the City �Ba9 agreed tO 'the Unified Sewerage Agency has establi latios >br 9 ).-43, Surf ae Water t nagemsn% Rego d�nf ©roe, ��;,s�o1'stion Nay ... . cti'ona of on site *rater ter quality facilities car fees , ,re firing the con�stssu .- The * eeolutiof re i.ree that a fee and/Or nis trt.ction of a water quality facility built. . 'The fee is based on ctl.on. lieu of their conet�cu co 9 ovate fea*at or pprti+�n . the amount of ,�spervioue ,surface. r every 26 1 he City cif, Tigard dettismirw, "if 41, fee tliere�of a the fee Ethel" be or facility ahaii be built 6 r,o.�,,.. �. :... STREET NoPwork ithinT a public.. right�dof --way shall co n3Lt h� 1toant has obtained a etr ®et opening ... Engineering r>!ait f1eoM the rlittglimb FLOOR, ELEVATIB%N la the a 1 is ". t than . z n u it On all trdjecta that req".aire a gradint, plan w A f 1Dose plan for peach Lit wh ch shall. have with the gaeadiag p the elevations of tout corners of that plan along with dl.evatiood at the lanaty�pca corner Of each lot. Ppy�111y��/�yA =wy� 4�wypf j�� /� , ... E6 ® OOAG Imo.- � ENdZNEE0.114d DIVIsltd limaigt 639 -4111 . 0: PREAPP o MS. Page 8 ILI APXCiMEC.I.W LIST van RPPTA/Ch ORS in. tig0 (2) copie+s v SO. 1•MIIONNI■ fa it. CITx DEPllt `'L'S _ Build ng Official/Brad R. 4lity Decozder Engineering /Chrie D. �„� Permits coc1nstor/le als 0. 3,. SPECXRL D1 1 V lire District (Pio c-ep kA;sc) >/. Tigard Water ItleVeict 6777 31/ 3uraLa St. Tiga, OR 97223 Waalrtin Valley Water l¢lattict 6301 SW Taylors Ferry ad. Tigard, OR 97223 AFFECTED 0 2C7IOP8 Muth. Oa. Land Use a Tramp. 150 V. First Av. Yliuiohora, an 97324 D at Chrtis ---- 3i viu Martin - Joann Rice scatt >k a....... Prad Steil* -.---- able liatitenoti City of Bonvert:on .o.o Jive 9.v4 yx PO Boat 4755 i'tavorton, 0R 97076 City ot Xing City .,_.,. City Manager 15300 SW 136th Ring, City, OR 97224 O;itt off' Calks Ostkoad `°°" City Dti eager 300 SW A "Lake ®saoegos 0R 97034 „ Stato Higbv y Division Bob Doran .; Pc Soar 25412 PGrtlend, CR 97225 -0412 5. Ak6i1TAB ,IGENCIE8 7Genezal Tn11apborlo Ruse Ville 460 SW Main 5,'t;i. gard, CB '97: 413 Slott i► ad Olen theta i1 bar 220 NH Mica*, Ave. Porr.tlandto 01 91209 TCX �... Nike pnliilekio�a apt Osagoi, 3500 SW Bond Stl+ ke d, OA 91201 CCtue iii Cable (Frailik Stone) 14:h00 88 Brigaden llr _ „Ct». averteo, OR N 7005 STATB AGENCIES • wormer ' rr.acitice Die. Omar—) Ae Board o Sagi.ne,* Reelt:li v$ld1ifa Perko t Regreatitaa Div. Suvieidrx Supervioor Dept . of FiASrg ► °` Dept. of Sia'�i1;on Vitality 7. FEDERAL AGENCXE t Boa -pm, ; i f Engiiinisks- Peet Office P. OTHER Sort erft t?zacific xeuas�iartaition Comj yp Dvanm , k4 M. Forney, PLO - Project Eigiaeoar `00 dtse Avenuo, , itl. 334, Onion Station. keittiand, OR 97209 NIMMItanim P, i Ittvreation Board co Fief Operations School Dist No. 48 ---- (3eay.rtcc) PO Don 200 Boavattun, Olt 97075 _Z Srhool Dist. (Tigard) 13137 SW Pacific limy. . Tigard, OR 97223 Boundary 020111561.0111 320 SW Stark Room 530. Pad, OR 97204 ---- 2000 SW rat ave. Portland, OR 97201 -539e (CPA's ouly)i 75 Court St. SE Sea, OR 97310 -0590 p City of Durham -- -- City Manager 17160 SW Boar Boos Perry 14. Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland .° Planaiag DirectOr 1120 SW 5th ifortland, OR : 97204 ODCM Lidetionr Reiman 9002 SR _ llclaoughlin Blvd. ) ilwankiee OR 97222 Portland °G9x era1 Blec. 11%2 14655 88 ®ld:: Schalk Pry. z!Meatitetatiott 97007 tro Area C' un tnt.ior Jeeon EeWitt /Win valto Sablytattgy Ccsto 1815 Ott 169th 0104 374620 SeLniront, OR 97006 -4008 lelS West: ""..' Fot a Deleon 421 teW Oak St... Portland, Cal 97.04 Dim vision of State Landis Commerce Dept. - M.8. Park LC1DC PDC Fire Marshall - hoar ,....:. Other. taff': ate cATy OF TIGARD COMMUNITY bEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST w red for they successful completion of The items ®n the checklist This checklist identifies k l i3t below are requ wh : application submission requirements. a is your app This sheet Mi��Y. �, b� brought required to be tubsitte ' with your appal .cation. ..._,ST . , x.�' • all other materials at the time you submit 'iour and submitted; with � explanation of !�Ci�,,�ese tuns or for further expl i application. Sergi: y'PUr application call Planning at 639 - 4171 BASIC MATERIALS lication for (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) "title transfer instrument 0) Assessor's map E) Plot Or site plan F) Applicant's statement dts H) Filing fee ($ SPECIFIC MATERIALS o a ti.e n sho14 Mo. of copies ,,, ----) 2) , Site size & diMe lions toUr ,lines (2 ft at Ga=les or 5 ft for grades > W) C j 4) Drainage C patterns, courses, and Bonds ' n 5) Locations of natural hazard areas ilnr lUding: A). ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: to 110 r if /Ai : ettrittinCe t,3 E 3 1) Site :Tnf �` � Vicinity Map ( 1 ) a) Florjdplain areas b) Slopes in excess of 25% c). Unstable ground d) Areas with high seasonal water table e) Areas with severe sbil erosion potential . '' Comprehensive ) � �• weak foundation soil•* G �) �r�� batting s�,��y Location of resource areas as shown on the Compre, Map inventory including. a) Wildlife habitats b) Wetlands 7) Other site features: a) Rock oUt :roPPi $ .. ,:. d 4 feet b) Trees With 6 AN 4 caliper measUred level ores rind from gr+�u ... �hoir e�se�s Location of esis struct �) stir e of s Location .. ... • .. f on and off-Site hoa��e �u�ir�e 1 Location of existing n ,ease nt C a�t� �t�es a ., D) Loca i .. dedicated r — s i�.) Location of su�st�. �4 ® ®) Site , of copies : _.,,,,m.�...�...�.:. �,.. �a►n olMi�rlta (NO, �ler,�elo��nent. 1) The proposod site and surrounding properties urn "lin^ . inter Vale Contour 2) ' o . �� a►A l k 3) The location; l'ii,v etisiofc and names Existing &' platted' streets & ot"hr,�r public +sail a) n ;the site a ori', * d joining. ' Arad sasetrents �i ' µ per•t`iOs E. E3 i3 C AOPLI+ ATI0N ClECKL E1 age ssi b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easement on the sate, c) Alternative tsutss of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension qj The location i„nd dimension of: 3 a) r ces and exits on the site b) Parking and circulation -areas 1 3 Loading and services areas c) �,o d) Pedestrian and bicycle ,circulation C ] e) Outdoor common areas, C 3 ) Above round utilities • dimensions setback distances of all: a) location, dimensio ,. improvements, The Existing permanent 3tctures, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feetet of the site ray events, b) Proposed structures, on the site utilities and ea 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7) The location Sanitary se wer facilities 8) The location areas to be landscaped 9) The andtype of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques mailboxes 10) The location a The location of all structures and their orientation 12) Existing or proposed event agreements 11) Ex�s sed sewer �reannbuo�s Gradin_. Elan (No. of copies y ) grading plan at The site development plan shall include shall the same scale as the site analysis drawings contain the following information. tape will ll 1) The locatiofn and extent to which gra lop ratios Place :indicating general contour lines, s. and soil stabilization proposals, and tine of year it is ,,)roposed to be done �) A statement from a registered engineers supp eted by data factual su5stantiatik,: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report b) .... The validity of sanitary sewer 'aft mtorm drainage service proposals �- • � mitigated and ) That all prod'° e�� vi 11 be d how they will big P$tigiste ma�yy ., • - .. . s Nlo a Of topic 3 b) 0) Architectural � nra�3 0 r�, tasa'� shall �,ncludo . The site development plan p p�._ i 1) Floor.pla ns i.. Qoicuatifg the square f eo tage of all structures proposed f or use on—site; and 2) Typical elevation ®n drawings of each structure z (3 .. pe . shall be draw at the s scale of the P,andscaa$ flan (No. of copes The landscape Plan or�a larger scale if necessary and shall •site analy�a� �nla � .n indicate tescraxpton of the irrigation system where applicable 2) 1) ht scre ing ,f fences, Location and height � beef ere a APPLICATION CHECKLIST Page 2 E 3 3 Locations of terraces, decks, shelters, pla areas and common oPen spaces 4) Location, type, `•sisze ,and spoties of 'existing an Proposed plant materials. a" narrative addresses: • which add The landscape plan shall include 1) Soil conditions be used,. t) Erosion control meas:Are3 that will F),pr°awi s �i dra}�a.ng shall be '�'abmitted ir�. accor dance ,,with Chapter �► a$ part Of Site Development Rev ier . 18.114 of the Cody. ` to obtaining, a Building Petit c constrruct the sign. prior Traffic gehewat_ipn bstima►.te �► imx��;r artataan aar l.ot lik_...,n��lustmec�t mab' shoE�►an� , ` 11) {Prel the (No. of Copies a �, subject Parcel The owner of 2) The o net °s authorized agent 3) The map scale, (2050,100 or 200 feet 1), inch north arrow and daub _ boundaries 4) Description of parcel location and boutndar. width and a es of Streets, easements and 5) Location, �� the parcel anther public ways within and adjacent to dings on and within 6) Location +�f all permanent brawl, 25 feet of all proper tY lines 7) Location and l' oxdth of all wat ?r courses p) Location of any trees with or greater caliper r feet above Oround level All slopes greater than 10) Location of e*isting utilitie s and utility , e as es C, i s 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed rig ht -of-way to cation and width C y. the proposed street b) A scaled crost�� -section of th plus �►�+y reserpestr��.�xea�srs e deed 12) Any applicable - not preclude u partition -- vision where 13) Evidence that and. � d,iic��r wi�.�. , erg applicable effi..;ittnt future 1 uksdi�►�.sidn Preli�oinar.. Plat,.� data sho�r�rra(,�9ai Copies -- It�`. -) 1) Scale equaling 30i50,100 or 200 feet to the inch 3 (3 (3 C (3 C3 C] E3 (3 and limited .n�fptheesper she e,, .. too The d nave subdivision collector., stellate ar��rial and 01 C3 C3' 2) T e prOp®se a) Vicinity .. � rap showing Property's relationship to 4) {3at�aa i', addresses, and telephone numbers of the owner 1icablo� developer, engineer.* Surveyera designer, its, aPP �) date of aPpli.oation 6) lines of tract to be subdivided r+sear"d+d 7) Names of adjacent subdivision oP names of ►reels of urrsubdivided land owners of a�djo%hing p►ac � �C3�t�- �si�ilblisl�od ` 0) contour lines related r�d�s �e�t�r ... intervals for 0.109E g` g Mark at ��f �aot than 10% APPLICATION IiHEC LXS' age • 3' AD au Yy • 9) The purpo e, :locaiti fl, type ynnd size of all of the following (within amid adjacent to, the proPoSed,. E subdivision): • to right � --of -y s And eas emc2 root ac C+ a�) public and pri�a b) Public and ?ri<sate sanitary and storm sewer lines c) Domestic water mains including fire by d ray tts power telephone transmission lines d) Major � Cam° (50,.000 volts or greater) # a!) : Watercourses C 3 f) , Deed. reservations for parks open space, pathways C and other land encumbrances 10) Approximate p lan and prof i les of propose d San itary and storm sewers with g rades and pipe sizes indicated ll) Plan of the proposed water distribution systems, showing pipe sizos and the location cf' valves and fire hydrants. 1 ) Approximate centerline pr ofilas showing the finished tree s for a grade ncludinc t extension • all. streets i reds of of the proposed ..:.reasonable. distance beyeand the limits C subdivision. 13) scaled cross sections of proposed street r ight -O -Way Z C 14) The location of all areas subject tp inundation or storm water o' ,fl(Aw C1 �d direction of flow of 15) Location, widt � all water -- C 3 courses and d we le ways 16) The proposed lot co,rf ,gurations, approx mate lot . dao�.ensi . - ons and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for Purposes other than rresidentia/, it shall be C indicated elocation of all tree with a diameter 6 inches ter 7) The greater measured at. 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any 18) The existing uses of the property, including the of the present uses location of all structures ' and the structures, an._ d a statement tem e tt of which � "dc ures are to remain after platting C eel . . 19) Supplemental information including: '<. tions (if any) ( 3 a) Proposed deed . estw"lc E 3 b) Proof of pr ®pearty ownership ou+islon of aubdivis�. on b)` c) A proposed platy for p improvements rock out• ExasExisting natural features including C o ins. wetlands at marsh areas: 2f� cannot 21) If any of the foregoing i s�act�,ca eliminar plat, it s a.nfgr�►itior! Carti r y be t ve and submitted t th the r be shown on the �i shall bt►c+ot�pca[�ated I into a narrative avp1ication: Other information (2361P/oo2eP) f pPLIcnTI0 �C EOKtiS ' Page •w' .N CENTER `:1f rat. Ha 736 2,S 89°51 W 19E '.6.s *Pod w 2O4 .� S 71* 39! W WOO S s'P5T W W 73°18*w 131.00 ICIL� �. _ f 181.4.1012 '81 =21014 - 85.8 .140 . 44 :1 1200 6800 . 45A2 .42.4 .2OAc. • !%.� •- - 1601- $35 91- ,27891 a8e 289.51_ 1600 µ - IN. �s it dr lift am `' - !' tip BBB. a ih 0)17100 41 RI /1.8.88 '' 00 7 6' eau s 1fs a ..�.r.o IT+ :MPs It ` L _ •a � 7 'y. • 7200 - _ .. ® _ A ., 1100 t27E,9�D_ ti se 3i''sejeJ as. e..,,-.—‘ o T. 1- .� 4 `4�2 �A6a�4 SS - 2100 2400 s sse 5# E 00 =400 - % �: 3200' _ "/ 1 1\i, hi] -Dr-2 ACE irk ........ I !6 MOO 4'3600 1Q$23 ; ` ' MO ril 15 ii'e 20 11243 8000 7900 700 9 std 83 3700 e 3 4 21 ®8100 ae CENTER Of CR.- NO. ?S6i %n 4 A r►i #..1r s :Apse tv mos 11 ter ii I N a s wood od w 204.00 A ae w s sssr w ! s w 6tri.'4O 61,1A41:. 7191111 CIVL- [6 $ .18 164i6393. RCA Rm590° 1119.99 tISSZ _ i 7700 t' 40 h X, to' �_ tz®,131 7600 9 a 93.44 . e°) 4 1400 94,-2,310 111 91 .a7Ac. 33 BOO .42 7 00 71(i) Ili •- 5YV i400 a.: fie t2.1 eei C s s 210 Sit E Yom_ eo.oa 7600 1 ttpl AWL tw a .. 7th '��'.► InrE • Beth 13AV ;' �J`tB s 2 Butt AVE. ! • S 'r1TE OF " REGON County oil Washington City of Tigrard teltiA maA Vk. .. ,. , being first cir ly and say: (Please Print) _ e deilose That I am a The City of iga.*.:d, Aragon. iworn la,ffir on oath �' That I. stiff $ed i IOTZ ' Cr PAY 'ALIC HEAP I1 ' FORS That I served litITI:c2 OF DECISION FOR: _._..� City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard PXaat -'ng Commission ' rd Hear,. i s *ifiCer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Nearing Notice /Notice of Hx : ,bit "A") was riaAix ed to each nago1 attached marked ibit "W the die said notice NOTICE P� DECISION as beretp bulletin board on illhc day of in the united postage prepaid. Hail on the xi Decision) of which is attached (Marked po eons at the addres shown on 1 q day c f attached, was Postal!: oil A4 App2oPriate 19.:_,_ ; and deposited day of 0 /'0'1 4-,.. F Y PUBLIC OF OREGOib wlw. Aeission E ire. �. , NOTICE IS ERBBIt GIVE' THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, August 1902 , AT 7_ a X00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CI'•: / C CENTHR, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., 'i"IGARI), OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE, NOs SUB 92-0009 /VAR 92-0017 FILE TITL : Starling/Edwards APPLICANT: Dr. Carlos Starling o/o Roger Edwards 4500 SW Kruse Way One #180 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 VARIANCE VA 92� 0017' sTARLING/E©W' QS REQUEST: A reqest for a approval of the following development applications: SUBDIVISION for L•'a 1) request approval to divide a parcel consi #ting of approximately 1.55 acres into lots between approximately 4,050 e approval to allow development of feet Code section acid 7,250 a axe feet. y 2) Va�i.arnc ... � t whereas a cul -de -sac local street to exceed 400 fee 18.164.030 (K) allows a maximum cul -de -sac length of 400 feet. t-y Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, AAPPLICABLE IREVIEW CRITERSAo Community 18.100, 18.102, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164. LOCATION: 14600 8i' Hall Boulevard (WCTM 281 128C, tax lot 1600) ZON o R -12 (ResWential, 12 units /acre) The R -12 zone allows single family �chec, residential �ni aparks multiple-family residential unite , residential care Facliti ®s, mobile home at subdivisions, public �uppor services, family day care, home occupations, t®apOrary uses, and accessory etz uctures among others usle NPO NO: 5 OWNER: Dr. Carlos Starling 15962 Scones Ferry Rd. Lake Oswego, OR 97035 THIS MATTER. WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18 �� : PUBLIC HEARING ®r CODE RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED 0 3 2 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COD BY `TH`� TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RUMS OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANYONE WISHING WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO tN . -... G T ., . PRESENT WI��:°�.��. L �' BE i�ilESENTED AT TESTflO ._.. , SEt PRIOR TO Pi��LN � " , "_`" OR AT THE Pti�.L .C: HEARING. PUBLIC HEARING. r .... 'IEVE u1 WRITING t�'RI HEARING, THE H�AROE��'s3 l�f`k"CER P�l� ...... . � . O C RlNO; AND STAFF REPORT �r THE �p^s PURL HdG - AT THE PUBLIC i3EA�tx RT P1�iF'STENTATION FROM THE CITY PLP,k�i''�R, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEj TO THE HEi R7WO8 OFFICER MA: 0O THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDI7']tO31AL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE WRITTEN TEST . CATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE INVITE BOTH ORAL AND APPLICATION. 1k]$SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER A.ugtnet 1 � PARTY T TLl !) TO ING I.... 1 �:9992.,,�, A►NY ' S E. ... : CI AT THE REQUEST k2 CONTONUANL"E 0�,. THE ��''A MARINO. mat R�.e�1� THAT RECORD 2�F1A�.N .,.,. T IN REQUEST �� T�7 THE GRANTED ... OPEN . f PARTICIPANT FOR T LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE TARING INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO n QI igeT FROM THE TIGARD CO? UNITY DEVELOPMENT BY AND TIE � IG' CONlLh .r IV i IRON APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OP THE REQUEST AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THESE CRaCTERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. IONMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST Mir:AIR S ECIFICALLY TO TM APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO MAar XtET AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE AILU L' SPECIFICITY TO OR BY OF THE A�2Z �S ISSUE I �BVT ��R P' �4 PROVIDE SYi�'.Id7C'�P�'RECL��a AN i1d4 ON THE REQUEST � A�P°FL1id�i THE DECISION MAKER Ai,�1 OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE TO THE LAND 'USE BOAR)) OF /APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLIMBLE CRITERIA CENTS PER PAGE. AVAILABLE FOR aT� AT LEAST O� NO COST C'?, COPIa!S CAN BE OBTAINED FOR ABOVE-NOTED TS ERE A 7CN�BPECTxrlt� AT L4 SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE VIEARILIG, A COPY OP VIE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE C1BTAIf `ED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FORT INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER aito 92241 ...,_— AT 639,-4111, 3°IGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD. , OR CONTACT YOUR IGHSORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) # �:"�...� • CLAIRPER * _ r+..,. � �..�. .,..� . PHONE NUMBER: i - 11111114 W.1; FAI#10 ONITA 5% t Wet S. Vt. Potts s'rit3`r • q'p: e • O C.:• P o rG ,o • 6 �? -• �. 'P ;M' Q•�./�.' YRO �S„�I, SZZL6 so aavuxaod 2IQ X4XSaoon M:3 OCS qv IR a7VMOG `maIM attri KoZSegrg °9�3CM1, tZ446 U.9 04V-x ' F'zi 43'Q MS So.ia P _ O w O. D M O q•• O q�}> ••• q 007)79— RSztTSg O 4 O • /� Y S]�71 P, VZZ46 gam+ GaVPZZ t S NO0Ugamia mg OILS 1 [ 4701V3 ' 1VZ LSf y VEZL0 ITO 4r i v S G4711 MVO MS STOVE NaaMINIV3 '11 q • O i� • O • O • • P 0. tJ 111 • q P • O • • QOE9O -a 6 1.i $il EZZL6 so GOVSZI a xa 7r1Vil MS LZLPT umraalig ° RHO o • • . P • o .•O • g O • • • 0.... zoe9Q- uRTTIESZ EZZL6 O ouvSlz ciAls,,Rn:vg kW LZLt'T ° o o • *# o , , , U Ttts4. ®Z'9Q°'t1°�p � m.a�G £ZZ46 offirxmOd S MS SVSL • ,► • • • • O .. 00090- GLITTTs Ott L6 ?YO UOOMU' BS aa nazi i .nuns SS9SSZ A malsM q s's m • m • •'� P EZZL6 S10 EiNIFTIVnd 13/LO Mr;' SOOL 222720 amv war 'Iowa o. • O •: O • O O • • q . • • O OO19O-11 tttSZ 5;ZZ16 110 UUV LL IS )I0014TSMT4 Ms OtSf3 3i0m3 a "S ' 0.r4 •ee••. 006SO"UVTTTSZ EZZ46 uo OUvolZ IL9 MS 069t!t IMAM a mamma 'snl wsa • • • M . e ...... q q e +' o o a • • 001300, wirrttsz U0 Iy ILO MS 0010: 'i 20e ° MON2G ••u'.Q•• OOLOO TISZ ITZL6 ' ti SIC ,,,,, ZS 31001102MIal MS 5.590 XEI O/Z Mai* sAa2S'I * . ° • ;• • • • • • • • • ° " ' ° • ° ° ° C0900-1111rEISZ tZZL6 )IC 330 OUVOI i SMZd MS sz9e T Aantu3`HS L° a7Vmoa ''fio -41,11110E ' aco8 •ode•w••q•ro •e••a •wo A® pZ4L6 'ro oulz XJ x,$' WAI4 Ms 'SZ99 XICAIII Olaf Wd ''oon 0 ... • .• ....... e • • • •' q • . 00,00 -mirrTsZ . tZZL6 U0 aUVOLI i0O1USSMId 148 SZSO W I.O1UXOS of . L 070.10 01 .00O•••YA•.•1.••tl.••••O TOt00 -mT'I .04 EZZL6 II2ifWIZ 11032O2N/d MS SOSO tttsz• • • a • a • • o • e • . . . . . . . . . . .• • • w e c oo °aY Z90L6 ?Ira miximaz 2%I3 84H3 MS Lia6 w Sn"1INvr 9 14 'f 1111 ' a '3iaRa i •••••••••O • 1FJ07M0- 4TsZ (.0 ZQOL6 40 Y34Oi fif WI ALISIA 11x41 t 57; SSCPT NYSIIS ' M:szO&OSNHli '9 S0g ' NOLriv 1I a IWiO Q ,amv S S2721ZB0 ° 3T1;t wS C ZIOUVOOVN 'V S. SIDNVITA sil;TION6SNVA • • •' • • o • • • r • o e • • s • • • • 0OtO0 -a1u FttSZ 28117: — 01900 o•oomi••iiiwoiaystloitli WADE, FRIM 87,tiLL 111 14715 Sid 84TH CT TIOME, 4 1 97224 ' 251128c-®2000 ••d'.:s, 4,4 QU,4 • a s•••A•dyi••... MAS$1,104 RONALD A t§ .SU N, A 14695' $W 84TH cit TIG ,tit& 9224,' 28112E0!.02100 o•..�•a;t'v•woait.e A4 a SANFORD, GARY L R S ' E 14675 SW 84TH CT TIGARD OR 97224 O. • 6 i 2S11,1'a��t8Oa0 d20O' 1s • ii► • n •'..,...44444** 'e• • 'f" alit, 3 81A /JAY! EL 1 14655 ,,S01 84TH C TIGAPD DR 97221 28I12ECt12300 ••bo- tlw•r••o••b ' r k I RN` 1XSBGs Ito 418 N LOTUS DAt pcitaratz, OR 97211 2S1120C -02500 4 o o 4 ih'e . a 0 0 o w w• 4 4 ii • NS i A AND , CM1111.0 20840 cRRR RD O ". &iT OR 97045 2S112W 0240 8 • ... • 4 •,Y • ! C'O • ... i 4 :- • 1100EMUIVP, It8141901ii D11 N, SR AN1 . liftiA 14690 SW 1114M ' CGA13ID OR 97.223 , 281: 00O2600 • ®'dtivptltl•wob••�•coi Tourant, L 1 1 ID SWARM, 14730 SW, 84112 OOURT °Z V/124 2811280-03300 is•e•e ••1+e••1eHai 44 AifiRlipaItgX a Rostra! 0 AND SHIRLEY L 14665 SW 83RD TIGARD OR 97223 281128 -03500 iiy•i4 oe4•sieirtlokl tli••: A J,1A AU p 37L' ' 1 14 AND .tt• a 14680 sw 83RD tioACD de. 1 2a1121'�..03400 so •'ooto••••11'oiso4•mw•of voo KENNEL 8 '14660 SO 831►' P"..00' OB, 97223 2sS iltid1 X13600 o%+ee`tii••'tloo ' i.►es d1orrtltl I '14 Di1k , R At1D PAND R' X70 'e1 t DR. CAR LOS STARLING c/o ROGER gDwARDs. 4500 KRUSE SAY ONE 41130 0S'GQ 011 97035 DR. CARLOS STARLING 15962 B0014E8 FAY ROAD LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 SUE CARVER 10155 891 HOODVigta bR TIGARD OR 0224 Cr CeEL6 uQ asueu INE MS SZtEL 40 AMID auuYer& ' TO9TO"ouZttBZ • • O • qll b 0 • 1► • O • Q. ! •• S_. .. .. Zc�La�+ HO aaIcad Ia maisa MSS I. , IN a' L4OG QN ' AMOISO I e3611M 0oo000oev,- •oo0omoo••W YNaf''0•`'49?Tt9Z �ZZL6 8IO 0• a o• a .. o.• e. 05005•9D00000 ONVOII /R 119Id MO OLL8 "0'0'0' 00400'° TTTEz IZZ46 uQ Offeix 049 9 71V0 M9' LZLPT : u rm 'xi i9 • S . • . 00g90- CIVTtt$Z EZZL6 V'O 41t s'TLUoa �ftl �t1Mlle" MOp49E9LL xaM2720�1O1`G`L A ; "A3 8 O••O..o •Oor ••oo Ox3 ..O ••. 000S0-4141TT SZ. Oi►T40 NO 000M98t9 GAY Ruin SI;VggO MS SS9SZ ZV I NM'T8EI ; ftIX0I 72V130IW 81121SdNVP ••.o•..•,.v ®0..0.•.• 0009O0QVTTTOZ • • • • • cznLs so asireI1 HALM M9 OZ9tt 7 8or "allounsmactuus • ! • o • • o e S • o . • • o • 00400-anrcez £Z2246 uO auvflXJ' XO U98NId 149 9T409 %I 'AN%aIHB £ 07vuoa ' GOTH '6ZZL6 13O 03VOII IS XOO W9I Xd M9 S Z98 8"3ii ZflB GINK U7 O L ' Q4oM Z9OL6 ZIO KIW' fl4 HID HSHO MS LtZ6: •• O Yo o o o •.. r9O O 0 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 VZZL6 NO G: PII OU %%%IMO MR SVE M 4 QrsgO90N9 °!°°' 9OTPO" REMITSZ VZZL w uO 011110X 0470 17VB MS 5t5p' MOEU V o OPVOMV}I I,zZ46 UO OUvOlrX aA18 771091 MS LZ4tT V SIQIx'lfzw ' L9 ZZZL6 ZHO SINd'L! i a H LS MS SESL 8N87TH tiAl`i}.' Niter 81100711 • • • .. 00T90-airrITSE . EZZL6 vO mums IS X0OUSRMId MS Q$98` • ... • . • . • • .. • o . • • 0 O 0 0 OO6SSO -Q t T8 Z EZZL6 NO G tOI I4LLS MC O65,T 'I 1WOi2 "a !' 72amJM '.91128[ 00'00000'0.0000000500 OO800 -aV . M T9 g EZZL6 HO Cf svoI �S MOO) W8 iIt MS` 9998' 7 v0/''x smreA ' 1.082'! • • •.• • Y V • • . -.• • • • • . • • • OQ9O0ep,P! ttBZ,, '6ZZL6 aO Ci�I't9x IS ?IOG 88KX4 MS SZ98 $ ArralCHO 's L $1,7vm00 C c! 0$ 0000000 EzZL6 9Q asvoix '200usamle M9 8998 i vXOI ' Mid 0ms Awn ' Q00M • . o q • o . e u s . • • . 'a • • a ♦ q. 0 00E0O- GVtttBZ z00L6 uo lose $fa A1$ CH 590t't KYSIB 't1astDMOStra . * 8OS `N07 iI Q sirsossa ars 2 SSa7HVHD ' I LIIWB I I?Ti� a H SID I �nT'smo9w`i$N !/' °°°°°°,°°°°°°°0055 O0 00 6 Yt9Z:. 2511280- 01900 m• r o e•• Y, e DIME/ I'LL t11 14715 SW 84TR, ,CT TIGARD OR :, 97224 26112SC 1 .' J 4.04 .: a d.•••• 9 U, nU° 1t, a Sa SAN X ; 14695 SW Sets TIM O .9722 28].1280 -0210p .•••••••boiUYe••Y . d/A•'• BAf POR,. Watt, L TRUSTEE 14675 SW 54TH ' TIGARD ' Olt 97224 251129C 022P0 'a.'o .e•••11,+i•• •0 e• 2R00'8R, 0T804 D :,JAYNitsLLM `. 1465.5 3W 841, ' TXG+ 'OR' . 972241 251i28CrO2300 • e• ♦'YaYee•oYYooeYcos UxCE gifleglUIRISES, INC 418R LOTUS DR posation OR 97217 A11286602500 1� 022 •4e C 6��19O DC•Y�'eY•6. * * , 0 e 4 4••4 �112 NEPPETAD, JOSS A R D M 20640 S ._ t'"".' OREGON CI O 2813.211c —o241 ,. • ti Y•• i aii Y p o i i' • a ,e • Y b e• d dUTkI AN 14690 5W 84T8 LTRT TIGARD on 972231 281x128 °Wing.,; r • • • 1 0 • 4 a , 0, Y••,,o '' utntr 0,r yi fL IUR. ,S SSZRYL," 1473 SW 134T a rua TIGARD 'OR 91,224 2511280.03300 •s••r•be•e ••me4•i 111104PHRICY, RoasRT D AND SHIRLR3E`. X. 14655 SW '63RD TI 'OR 9722 2S112&C, - "03500 FLATRU, MARV N 14 AND BARS` 14680 SW 331110 TIOARD OR 97123 219 t t 2BCm O34®O e s 'e a ,e • e o i I a. e L b•• Y. d WliLDOO tatmEti 8' AND 5 14660 SW 8 PORTtANb Oft 97223 2131128C-03600 it eeeor ••oY•Yiicir•e4044 BRAD1300 ; ROOM' S AND SANDRA 14700 5N 83R" TIGARD OR 97224 ae s . +s3ooe,'lv�'nnl,eeilkICY 4317 ` -- "• GiiC l ..rawgawwn.Y.rwrwrw a11I G1.19T .1 O�Iwl9gbi, 1_t]T �• .. -. ' NRRINER OE OPHENT INC A , Sr 1.21 . IL r. 14, TOTAL. Tex sspv. rr D'iSTRICTSi 1.67.684909i5.1%140$56 u�3.41EARSSES9T 7�31�T�+_At"�igGEt �"" LAST ASiEDwrrw..r _ 25 I 1 I i AD- 0010 � 545 4547 511 MNY 0217 etl ' RATE 26.1 '56 ALTON. DOA r I VANSCHOTEN► • SOSAN CO! E AREA; 023.74 (TAX . CODE) RMV LAND S. 2 TAX . ► :'` W PROP+CLASSa 6012: MAINT AREA; 2 C' • 0000erw..wr000. 10:0150 "T`RATE 7.019 ..- PROP TAX %385.76 ,,0.0000.0.0 00 , . I , ►... I _ D IMPR 3 5I142U SC I CAT: 1S.I570 40.00111 con Ctt;it a Or00o t991 LEIaV A A APDf1SYSTEM R500693 .(1890301 RTS 9247 . SW i CREE OR cogE ARA: 023.74 (TAX-0104 . ..— TUMalata —OR ,02 ::a,— , 616TR 1 CT i, 67.66. �'3e°'7e X65 PROP CLASS: IOI2' tMAUNT AREA: 2 ^ —mow :'s { w NOh MARY E AND PATRICIA K PIN DRQOK ST ?ONE s Il -7 . ' I s rYTTti"rT CADS 4EHiO23iq0 D.a.;o. Ey ai_ctl. PROjLASSt 1212' NA1§1 AREAL 2 kual YF SASS S�E 'iv.; 50, D— R5r `� PINEDROOIE TERRACE Pt (1,04 1 Y $BAC rw00719 t 9'�IS781 r _ ; RMV ASDD % 70 ►710 TOTAL TAX SIy036.94 ,:i,, CODE. AREA 02.i.74 (TAX CODE) PRQP'CLASS: 1012 $1R1NT AREAL 2 MESSED S 90:340 601.1°T RATE . 74702 ARV IMPR S 66,670 PROP TAX 32,346412 i t Ri TA AiLE 5 73.860 ONL1N. RATE 3.9084 6 � R PJIU 1691) S 73,050 TOTAL TAX 31:919:229 ...rwwY. I H 37 il... e 8605 C a--i -- -- NI -•1.. , .. e` I i► R T ' GOUT RATE, .0702. 7 RLEY H SITU51 SW PINEDOOOR ST 3 I:4 ,,. m _ ASSESSED S 36.030 ODE. .. S 1 t i i ► r► I i a r PROP TA %96.D2..'. Amt1 IMPR 3 160430 �43i4 ►57 ►3'05 h .. I 1 1 ►, .00000 rwwwpl r w : »r.rq..rl. r..w r:. ..wwl.wwrr. . I 1 1 ► : - IMPR 3 110,62 RAIoACT 15 i 5 CHlle4 QATB i_niQz it EOR00K 5T :ONE R./ 2511 (AD�00500 PIN - 14 OINEDRoox 5r T I GARD a OR 97223 COPE AREA; 023.74 1 TAX .CORE ) PROP' CLA55: _ I d l 2„'_11A I NT.' AREA t 2 Luau. ,,.,... RMV LAND 25:840 ?FGii RATE . 26 ►1356 y 0y j _ I a14 i � �. . - L.1 iN.il 'lull. FJ wgwri rl buYwak.rb .ik�Wiii TgINSF B 2 R P id.....�i.. ..wT,�E,.,�n o oP'p 10 h �..wr.rw.w..gws11e .;�i19 3se:�C�3,A S IfILLI'A.�r� T�3.Y.e. ^Nrrwgw..q n.wuwgw »wrrw» 1wL,�a� ti wgrMlMgwwww »II i0d 0000 .. iuNrw w .CLA. r 0000000 0001 »00x0 A509737 (94681) L000 TA TR fl DL.- . E S 114320 1w � �0 ...0U.» 14 t f. E_MiAT : k. I _.. ` �" 9 064 EOROO ST 8655... SN G I N K CODE .,.AREA* 023.74... TAX CODE1 i 100 ,I IIUY AREA: 2 Z6 ► ,7186 4 61 :ul 1,Y FINV ASSD S 111:320 ,TOTAL TA 52;119149 I' .. Wwrriiwwbi .lLra.d.bq.iia.li�l�rw�siwi. ^. ^ g.Lrgw:riiriiwwdwiiu • ...i. �. :., , :... a, .. Ytwt.alfis++.G�t»�In4►alt ASSESSED S" 95,650 100'T RATE Yi.0702 a, 01050 uNLII'Ca R TE q li9634 ,., AC b /^ it . Rn�uc�. I�MLLer. 119 ►.. r ..1791 LCNT a. '; 1' 1. ,! . ___ R' MRH R19� .. -... ' : 1 ' - : 1 • 1 , - .,. I. . .. s .:.- ��/,��.(�J��` l'1a,1 • I :. - •�jrJr�.�r.ill�.a...l nA`^"° 1 11r _o 115007 85_-737 .t9�i68!I LANG 26,100 ;STATE ?ANT N 37154 +ECOY� ,: a` 8!56 5N P i NE6R00K CODE pR�ASi 5 ©Z3.74N 6 TAX CODE T'irtan _ pR �7R2�w.e� .1 ' o "'�7.......44.111...- ` •" `�I TA1'AELE' S 1!1,320 UNLIN` RATE 3.9061 1 !I. .4 C" PROP CLNSS t 1012' HA I NT AREA! 2 ' . IIMU 11550 S 111020 TOTAL TAX $2,091,54, I , 1 1 IDENEURG i N f/ 1 1 JOE L ' A5SE55ED l� 95, 651/" RP1E 7.070 n�I� ' DISTRICTS! 1,67�9,9,5,15,34,6D, „.�. RAU IMPR S 680770 POOP.T1X $2. '11 • .,.. .. taTA r N.., LIM .AIL__.. I____ LAST' YEARS tA55E55EDt s75 5191 R ti°. - ' `1 ,w...- t1YE -. CEP. T..�'�. x17: !1 E!) W48S 859 t'3 .0 1. ---- R500755 .(94603) M63362 39608 001 OA 0 14550 5Y, ;' -.1` :1 87TH. AVE .205.2.42,-...-.......,„, ,.dr,.- ,..,rte.... . . ■ ..�4 ..-. l.www.Ii�lww-rinr,.w LAIRD « 227.40 ��STATEgNENT N 3'4I�'500� '" j • • 14590 5N 87TH S!TUS2 14590 54 07TH AUE 1 .. 1 ; ' R; A55 Eifi' i �'O��TiM RNTI `'w"'7 1)702" TAXABLE 5 87,470 UNLIM RATE 3 91114 26� i+ 27°S314 t , .'t' T 7 ;9 �MTT i o 4344,57/1065! p� """"..." 'td178g . MU ASSD S 87,170 TOTAL TAX S2,27Z.3S DUA - DEPT OF VE,N 46836 39608 00! ' bow -rwr-wwr-www rrdrrrwurr4wwwwwwrw rwwwwrwwmrrw ..bd -. -.. :111 b11111... 111,1 ., 1111_ -. :. -. JwwrNMbbrrrrdwsrlYbbbwn. _ .. .,.. 1111. 1111 - 1 1 .. " •: 1 ' I 1 , • 1 , . 1, 25tIIAD U0900__ • PAUEEZOt08EX'TRR7AC E 0 14560 5H 87TH .: _ 1 ^ , R.) STI E .; 1i V 'i HPR S 47.990 SCHOOL. RAPS" 15.1570 � 411 G1Ur .R , 70z 1 ' TIGARD, OR 97223 5UTU5: 14560 5H 07TH AUE . .r.�rw�... 1 ; ' I , , _ 1 r . I4� •..`; � ,• 11 ip `. c. 0MU LAND 5 27,410 TAX RATE 26.1356 • g 4 __.. �.r.� .1 ! " 1 1 ! CT w" j.'I Ti r.ww.w., 1 , , v ,' , I , , , , 43.4, 57 • 3, 63 (1 MA - DEPT OF VE,N 1176716 48042 001 ..ww, -... 1 - .'I nrwri. wrwndLwwwr.:w rrriY rr,4,. .., ... f'¢ i fi / /.3 l i) ) w rr...c a.ra. ..mr• 2511103- 01000 ,.. _. 1 r 1 t, �. 1 L1 143r1f .rw..°-n IMPR S 40,510 SCN,CDL RRTCa 15 +1'5x'9 S .750 920 _. %° .. • 14565 SK 07TH DISTRICTSt I,67,60,69,9,ri,I5,34,6J, °..��85ED unt �iTE°'.."°'911E1i�,"m": RN LAND 5 27,410 TOg RATE 216.135'6 LAST YEARS ASSESSEDt 560,310 E..LB F I R5L I.21frSj 2.I.fLI .Q2 L 6 _.- -o.l,_ _.._. rs ..- ...- ,-- ._..: -- --- ..rte , fas t h Ion CJt+nS�F o C O : 2 0 A A S Y S T E H H w OKN5HIP S 2 RANGE ! Zm.aatr�!.2akie R rl ERT...... ,,aormom .O34NfR NAME_ AN LE 5E -P.f3 tPE RE R1 Tl CIS_. �.e F�.4 ".lF�rtfiNS U_RALIJES _,e....o TAIt A DUNT. . . ,_„„. _ 8500702 (916863 hl'DS:. ktNDBERGr JO' N .. C ©DE:- FlREAS r°'.°°��°-'S!E55EA- T'�"Su�- 023.74 OE) _ TAXABLE. S 79,740. • O. PR 5S i 55EHA It NSg. 36D AREA. 2 LOT 0 PINEBR00K TERRACE LAND 5 27,410 SMITH, ROBERT M GERALD I IlE`;��~ Q,TUSi 14605.50: 07TH, AVE RAU AHD 71.740 TATEHENT N 371t RATE .3.900' R; t'��___"_- TOTAL TAX 'S 1 ,�6 ASSESSED S $r P"'i7 TS" 75,950 GOVT RATE 7.0702 .'R' 004 RAU IMPR S 49 ►953 TPROP TAX 61.03.077 251 1 1 A0 01300 -i wnwb -r .wwwr .�. w:: ww-wdwwwwnb. rr- brdwwri.brb rrrlw.w rr aa� Jrwrrl b rr -r... b - --- bbrrwwb "- .. . ,� FR .. S 55. 10 5 H ' ��__�� ► , 71 t C OOL R �1�T�E �5,,�,��I�0 1TY�he ,'rE°'"_i9.1�ftF°' -"° t 14E44-41414401-4 LINO S 27, 410 TAX .RATE RATS' 26.135!6 '___ 7100.534 HA - 115211111 22 DISTRICTS!.1.67.(4.69.9.5.15.34.60. . 7100 .5N HAMPTON 3 a . 85g500017 �14689) "- '"' -PG1 L9{ SHNRCN.LEE LAST YEARS ASSESSED= 665,800 se.. srr wwwrwwwwwwwwpwww- rwrrwwwrwwwrww- -w- wrww-rwrw -wwwwu ww w www w HOotsO I..bUR LOT. 1 6LOt;k LAND S 26,100 STA1'ENOIIt N 37164 0411pp� mm,,��gg�� [[EE y r R ERIIDK'' i1E . • TAXABLE S PY:750 11ia1.1M: RATE 3,9084 R - .,t wRU_• DISTRICTS1,1,67469b ,34,6D, RAU A55D S 87,750 . fdii:.. .•i 1. _ AST YEARS t AZSE5EEDt.569,310: .... . U1NA U, vt t1864L0 57776 DD 1 . R500O26 (94690) LOT 12 mock P$!lc8ROOlt TERRACE TAYLOR,,' FRED /ALICE �t p- ....,.AR qAE �! �+ 4 TAX 5 .D". • 11.I4r 1.� 7l 115 {► ; J{V /'� nCOlil7{I 31 "•....-.r...wl . 1A._L 1 CC G GODS, y 0� .7!!. , (TAX CODE) idsRO..10I'N�1 RREAiE' 60:_ ." 4, L S 26, 100 STATEIIEPIT 0 3' 165 0 R T XABLE S 80.240 IlNL IA. NATE 3.908'0 'R1�� AO A553 S 80,240 TOTAL TAX ;52,292:35 1111,. ND :. .,:�dv,� .,. w.... .._.,•.,�...,.... ,:111:::1 . �,� cr• Mew o•. ovw 7 vamonostasoscammewavoam Ink NCNB. NrdhkW: CouG P . O R S Y S T E M TOWNSHIP S 2 RANGE t 12 egROL IAL $I , P. AGE p . w� I/ R501237 (9473.1) ZONE s CTY LAND S 290600 STA TERE Pi $ 37208 a -; S I•: 8730 *IN PINESROOK ST T i , _ �L..DR.. P7223 rrr 4ww'4 � a.. "',i5aP0N r CODE AREAL 023.74 (TAX CODE) TAXABLE S 89.690 GALIN. QF!AAT�E 3.9084 1 : . i. 1 - i r �TN7{TA . aI PROP CLASS: 10121IAt:NT AREA: 2 RHU ASSD $ 89,690 TOTAL TAX 52,330.01 ) b PiATIANt ROL H SITUSs871 05 N P INE BRO OK ST A55' E. SED S 8649- 0 GOu T RATE 7.0704 ' e U R ' ! o , a P , , , ,•t ) 43,4,5703`65 RNU IMPR 5 51,340 PROP TAX S2./16 „98' •;I' ':: •.,5:. �: �:. t.'r.!: q 49 OTRL TAX S II .98 - Q�eL PSt � • 3 ICI -05800 ...a.�1 ... . .fir ' rrGf7 +e M 9a - 9570- 8572 SA PINEBROOK' ST ZONE ” �HNPP S 45.200 SCHO�r1. RATE 15.1570 25655 5H GRAHAMS FERRY RD 5i3ER11A s OR 9 5,4TU5s 8570 S!d PINEBROOI( ST RAU LAND S 24,700 TAX RATS 26.1356 �(E_.AR ; ' ; r ' U a•t 4 2'0 PR T'K SI"8( °.9� TIIC , , r . K— 1__ 43,4,57,3 65 Uw_wwwr bnrr.l -190 'ELF - 'CENLAR FEDERAL,O 3439'2556306 i.nbrl.�..w B-- l•F 25l11AD- 05980.. _ JGR ".°57s tNFR S 49.73; . ' h . , , e S .. .73 ` SCHOOL .RATE 1'9.1570 5 TT II CARD. 97222;,4�yw ') , .. , r t)7 5TR I CTS i 1 a 67a 68, 69, 9, 5,15, 34a S0, RNU LAND S 23,4A TAX, RATS 2'6.1356 I w—.-,...,- d ... LAST YEARS ASSES §ED: %50,090 . 1Z4 . - R�Q.: REUENUt:•�, N RJ34D208 �R50��, (�94739) 7835 514 07TH ---M12116-0-22223 - _ .. _ ,�...�....r..�. D (!4675 -f "16;7 511 NHY 217 ZONE.." CTY _ _, LAND S 22,230 µ�UA_�TEHMEhT�U '•,37212: { CODE AREA, 023.74 (TAX CODE) � TAXABLE S 73) 570 GAM. RATE 3.9084 023.74 69, 9.5.I agA__ Rtl H T eA►NT x"30 r , ► AREAt_.._.......rr�...� RI1U ASSD 5 73,570 �.�.� PROP CLA55s i0i2 M TOTAL TA, 51,9,1,24 Lp T MARS =s = 07.78 ai 7 Nas11in• ton,.Counlq, Oregon THE SOPTNABF f'J IEC.. O11NER AH Pi,0�00R •5,. ..�P.ROPERLY DESCRtp,T �E. C .:... ... (JAL TANK Q I�NT . X5012132 _oil jay At t s QL'i t T5 P R GE RI , .(94756/ D 14705.14707 Sii NY 217 2�1N2 = CTY LAND 5 22,230 STATEMENT H .37213 R 96)500 UNLIM. RATE 3.9084 H1) ASSD S 96i500 TOTAL TAX !2i506.93 auuun. �crm n,.0 l�ce.crvs: 7, IWDr r TfI an .nnr: Gr 7035 5N 87TH CODE AREA: 023,74 (TAX .CODE`. EORT �►. ► r ; r r.—L 67► 68.69, 9. s L _jaw. _MAINr AREA: - 1GGEiB�L 4F� f D S7�d:990, TAXABLE r S X. AUQINE A1d �T p 3 LA�li1.. GRAY, M,u61 ASSESSED S 71400 GOVT AYE 70702 -.. 11 'err 3 2 4a rrrw.....; , '�r'rwilwrwwr- lJq''� r�r.(�}'___ 4_•_ _rr,ur rani -Y hi6i� JYL9 , 4 %�I ! •••rG i rnrs.vi..a...mis 25,111 Al; Ii6201 .. DISTRICTS: .1)67,69)69,95,15)d1'4,6n ) a � �. l� ilMU AS, t . '..µi:6A1, PROP TAX S:x860eD6 P I.ASSESSED, 556. 1 Y i G rr111 T11. Fi i�� •.�ne.,re, �.r r' w...�!L� T.. • •� .. � i � i+a.e ,AST YEARS ,!')0 wwwwwwwimmnrrwrwrwrrww.,.,o Awwwerrrrr w.. e. muriwomab: csrri .wwls ..Wb.rwae.a.marrwai.s.w co I HPR, S .2e0 ' scN.OoL RATE 15. 5 DEAUENTON) OR 97005: DISTR •1 38 r U, CTS i : 1) 67.601, 69.9, 5, l :', 34, 6D 1 RNV LANDS 22:110 5"AI,' RATE '6.13:6 AST YEARS ASSE55eu1 548,000 '"�ilTff'ti 1) 57Ti9' RSi'ast i i, (94739 �,.5 . HH.L .BLVD ;:r is Ii i 3881 TTS._ 3037. l 1138 ®1;_ i ... • wr• LAND s 22j 311 Si' STATIH II E NT A 1537216 7' 1 ,, i a S I TUS I , 4735.: SA .AOY 217. • , TAXABLE S 68:310 i.INLIM, RATE 3:9084 _ R 6, 66,., ...x,, P '� ' s...' '....., . 43, ..57, :3.65, • . ) ► � . RHU 1155D S 68.310 TOTAL TAX 1074i59. J 20229 61 14 04 nommomem 12 t2 12 3 4 6 v 4 2 4 2 10 6 4 AUL 56 84 94 r 56 i70 356 J 7 1 5S NASh1n Son COUnt . Oregon IV 4 ✓ Mw rw. A A S. V S. T E M TOttOSH11f 5 2 RANGE 1. 4i Y."i101r1�OPERTY It, iY t k 1SOUHT' 11 NANF.:IiI'1.9.5 PROpEF1TY OE5Ct3 i53tENP bN�_ K +_w (JALU 5 ry �. t t • . ..:.,wLO 24 SCHEMA PARK r R i 0 i 5311.. t 1 X9595 y LOT .24 ZONiE " R -7 -r k v- 1,:.. 9._ S1! SGHECKLA .DR TAXADLE y11f1�t 9895 43:4:574365: LAND S 260100 ..STATEMENT 0 37216 AXADL 9054 I: 4 (1HLIH. RATE , 3 :9064 RItU ASOD 4 96.1311 TOTAL TAXI $2,497:34 l.li ', ...i r.r_. r I __ rrwrr ✓ 1lAD "0670.1 5.. 8865 5 ECKLA DR i r - : O, • 71��,,,,1;,;, 9'7�4DR D15TR `CTSt`ij6766i�69 :9a5e15i34r60 LAST YEARS R5bE55E:.: x$97:720 :• :• :: i : GHR GMAC (10RTGR: M °531t/3112115664-....- ... ..... _ • . 7��j,� �LNI'L4Mgh fid I.M51 YCHIi7 Pt�31�"�GS�f � � ...R..rGMAC. wwi.rrii.rM ,:r -w r -1 w w.4 wrrw rN ^r.i 4 -!r 111PR S 034340 SCHOOL RATE 1541570 7 11 1 rU° R .0 ..I356 LAND S TI1X RATE Il 01015369... (1(1pD8 55) LOT �2 StHeclILA PARK ESTATES e8D75 SCHECKLA..,.DR D StT�R3CT } :67 :68.69 :9 :5► @5 :34 :$0: TAXABLE. $ I GARQ,t . nR :97224 , R t I S Pc ,_ ! ; t r LAST YEARS ASSESSEOr 61054100_ Pill) A55D $ 142,210 TOTAL TAX $3:69t1.4I 28.71D LANH 206710 5' I1TEHENI' 11 . _: 37228 y"1 " If I'!$2;219 UHLIl1. RATE 3:9064 3: t , A .RIiT Il eb LEUERETT: DEANN ,/j�E�rp DISTRICTS C I 67:Gd :69,9;5,•15 :34 :80: 1 4 s T IjT. t9 3 ASSESSED of t I `630 GOU.,.T RATE 7.0 02 TAffit1LE..S -` 91 :4 _.;. . • f {IiV 4111 {I +I .• P. RHO I1`�i! S 104.220 T PROP TAX 53 :419.5'5 OTAL TAX >, S, I N: 6 LOST YEARS ! ASSESSED: 5981 w, °!A DWR DFtiPT OF UE: it F�6031 F„},J,4 (1u 1 ..rrwu ' �t. • [is •• 1.as,5�g�Bo��n e111 Oregon Di9��' 0 A A S Y' S T E M r»1?ISHIP S it CIANGE 1 1491 I �U IP Ra, i r"t�,,,,PItOPERTY .�. 10:1 �3�,, 1 0121, P1t PAGE di i"IM�.�`'IE31i- ^,lll� •_. fl}�p/��IRkP AN ,FOR . C P ItlN �.,EXEH ?T _.�>�r�..a8 .e11 , ..-. ...-- , O�PER1Y D��,i.�._ �OH�S ljAlll� (�� R501262 (94736) r„ D 14705 714707 511'HNY 217 ZONE - CTY LAND t 22.230 STATEMENT A . 37213 r r... Nom` 7835 7TH I; CODE AREA: 023.74 tTA^�` 001 TAXABLE S 1tu.RATEiaq. R Xffggl aµ " t]I� "°"' .6 a e e , TOTAL TAX $2:506.93 PROP CLASS! 1012, MAW NMI' ��•' RYJ21 A55D 9: 96.50D TOT . a.r.+.a.Cir,.mrm,e q '� �P tiiNE CT�T' ----- ASSESSED S 71 :4x00 �GOU'T RATE 7.0702 - - '".. 11,' ;x: Us" GRA AURINE A °'_. _ b ,,, O , _ y DISTRICTS: 1467:6049045,15434460, RMII IMPR S 49:37tl ja"te OP TAX 51:860.06 ∎•••3 201 X2.14 gv., tOTRL. TRX �1,8bQ t.�.,,a ..r.' _.. - ..,, 'r• c ii IAD 0• `,. _. ..o LAST :YEARS ASSESSED: $5164143 a _ 1.1,1wrrwwrw�w..r .i,. r .r w ' . .,. vr..4vw�.ml. , J 4a"�.msw.,.".Iwl�rli,. I f Eti IFIPR S 38,2DFi 5CH001.IRATE 15.157 , to �'N �j , . .u. a 1 ATE $ 267 ;996 . ! 22.230 TAX RATE IIISTRIGT.a! :d:67 :6D:69►9c5.15.34 :60: FIMII LAND 5 22. b. _,; ,i 1 _.T: �, --. _,,, I,,,w�I .i » ` SO." w d .�, 1 • VER70N: AR 906!5 � 1 1 "P+P�'EA'i' r 1 p 1 . LAST YEARS , I A55E'��ED:'S4D :000 8501317 (94739) N .r.�,.r....r.r 14 J27 ALL !OD .. 1 ., y . !�� -•- r 0 LAND $ 22 :23$ STATEMENT 0 37214 11138lTTS 30371113881 DN CTY R- T• i5.I D ...� �.l.?r.... TAXABLE . �, C'3. ,1n UN .,..'.» ZTlo _ 3.9384 /. � 1 I TI R � b c ,�6 S 1 4735i 5N, W,NY 2A 7u 1 ""'- I 1111: iX + i'fai '"'-- ' i�.m.41111:9A+53441+"*""-- TtiPR" 43 :4:,,7.3:65 ' : ' R TAX $1:774.59 Y; , (1 A55D S 68x310 TOTAL r RM M _ w: I:AND SPEC �2� aM ' _ STATEHF.NT _- �3_� (2 7 . 1 F' ._r� ...1r' .-r " { • ►'►� �`r5�. 57� tta HA�jH99ggACH. CrlATHALEEN �l "'".". _ 1 1 ' 4 • . . -D F"FITC HIlY 217 ZONE = CTY IMPR • . $ 660 GOU'T RATE 7.077002 A55E55ED 5 _ 4 ��_��3_g 1�11R1i i' `-`"_ CODE AREA: 023,74 (TA1f.CODE AMU SPEC S 12:240 PROP TAX tl:'I63w85 0a.5 15.311, 60 ...-211 � '$ ,�.6 -' A0W 4 , ... 4 : t PRO CLA5S..5032; MRINT_.l EA: 2 RKU A55D S +144800 LIA81L.1TY FARM DWERRALtIke FARM -may _ ;...:. - -.: -: :. S1.c.v -. _,. .. > .. -' . -. ,. -' " _: ., .. ._ . .._. _. .. _. .... NASh1n Son COUnt . Oregon IV 4 ✓ Mw rw. A A S. V S. T E M TOttOSH11f 5 2 RANGE 1. 4i Y."i101r1�OPERTY It, iY t k 1SOUHT' 11 NANF.:IiI'1.9.5 PROpEF1TY OE5Ct3 i53tENP bN�_ K +_w (JALU 5 ry �. t t • . ..:.,wLO 24 SCHEMA PARK r R i 0 i 5311.. t 1 X9595 y LOT .24 ZONiE " R -7 -r k v- 1,:.. 9._ S1! SGHECKLA .DR TAXADLE y11f1�t 9895 43:4:574365: LAND S 260100 ..STATEMENT 0 37216 AXADL 9054 I: 4 (1HLIH. RATE , 3 :9064 RItU ASOD 4 96.1311 TOTAL TAXI $2,497:34 l.li ', ...i r.r_. r I __ rrwrr ✓ 1lAD "0670.1 5.. 8865 5 ECKLA DR i r - : O, • 71��,,,,1;,;, 9'7�4DR D15TR `CTSt`ij6766i�69 :9a5e15i34r60 LAST YEARS R5bE55E:.: x$97:720 :• :• :: i : GHR GMAC (10RTGR: M °531t/3112115664-....- ... ..... _ • . 7��j,� �LNI'L4Mgh fid I.M51 YCHIi7 Pt�31�"�GS�f � � ...R..rGMAC. wwi.rrii.rM ,:r -w r -1 w w.4 wrrw rN ^r.i 4 -!r 111PR S 034340 SCHOOL RATE 1541570 7 11 1 rU° R .0 ..I356 LAND S TI1X RATE Il 01015369... (1(1pD8 55) LOT �2 StHeclILA PARK ESTATES e8D75 SCHECKLA..,.DR D StT�R3CT } :67 :68.69 :9 :5► @5 :34 :$0: TAXABLE. $ I GARQ,t . nR :97224 , R t I S Pc ,_ ! ; t r LAST YEARS ASSESSEOr 61054100_ Pill) A55D $ 142,210 TOTAL TAX $3:69t1.4I 28.71D LANH 206710 5' I1TEHENI' 11 . _: 37228 y"1 " If I'!$2;219 UHLIl1. RATE 3:9064 3: t , A .RIiT Il eb LEUERETT: DEANN ,/j�E�rp DISTRICTS C I 67:Gd :69,9;5,•15 :34 :80: 1 4 s T IjT. t9 3 ASSESSED of t I `630 GOU.,.T RATE 7.0 02 TAffit1LE..S -` 91 :4 _.;. . • f {IiV 4111 {I +I .• P. RHO I1`�i! S 104.220 T PROP TAX 53 :419.5'5 OTAL TAX >, S, I N: 6 LOST YEARS ! ASSESSED: 5981 w, °!A DWR DFtiPT OF UE: it F�6031 F„},J,4 (1u 1 ..rrwu ' �t. • - ng CV 41- 41110 N 4 H �Iahln� a Ccihi a' O ER1.. 199! I,rll. ,,q A AI?1ol�. ft R PROP RTx, • nWt�E`R „WANE _ ONO_ A ➢Dl3EN5. Id l 48(12 12 (I 73184 ) fA1 I 14597 SW.01ST CODE AREA: 021..74 i5,1) 4i AO. AR g72e r 74 cTAX ca0� PROP CLASS: 1012 ;_1AINs' AREAS 2 LAST YEA,• i I' 1 . DURHAM ACRES PT LOT ∎ 4: . I7AC TOWNSHIP 5 2 RANGE 1 •w P• ' ONO 5 2@0530 STATEMENT N x.38908 °., r 6: SCH _14F- ,�,", f±Y6�:,_ 210:2..'i '�UNLIH. RATE �6.9054 121,220 TOTAL TAX 53,149'T49.g4 TAXABLE RHU RSSD S ., S " 2511 N _ ACRES PT lOT +• yr :► ASSESSED $ 124,370 NAIiE, �GRRE4,1..�5TE1.1E4�50N JR/ ��5s 14533 SW 81ST AUE t! 3` `-�-g +�`.�w s rrs "o.�l�Fer �- RI'i1J !OR S 954840 TIGARilr OR 97223 43,40574.3,65 111 CAT - CONTINENTAL IUC,N Q245 842029 251I2DC'...00 ACRES' . PORTLAND, OR 97220 1 s , CODE ARCA 023.74 (TAX CODE) 96 • ''4Tw N B GOVT RATE 7.0702 R• .'1184 PROP TAX 530 230.97 �T TAX 3 230 9 ' '309i'�e .o IPPR S 48,620 SCHOOL RATE 15,1570 RHU LAND S 27i'4,20 TAX RATE 26.1356 RHU.J5.S.• 18x6? PRO TAX_: it 1 6.06 PROP r. A , • PROP. .lDi2; HAINT AREA: 2 oi`" LAND ` 24,280 STATEMENT d 30911 R5) 752 (96500) LURHAM ACRES, LOT PT 704 -ACRES .45 A 4 2 q SCE OI. RATE 15.1570 HAL "E �.. � � CODE AREAS 023.74 (TA>t.CODE) RHV LAND 5 �4,z00 UNLIM. RATE 3.9D04 89�Er », ti ........,-......M1011...11.1290 ,.. .., -.. ....., P 1"56 FARTLANI• OR_ X7221 .. e• 60 R� ASS13 5 24:280 RTE � . ' TOTAL TAX 3630.75 1002: MINT A421 2 �w� PROP'CLASSi R511672 (96502) ►4ILSOH ACRES, hnt PT 6, ACRES 1.55 BY E 61400 WARD. SITUSs 14600 SW HALL BLUD ! I 1, 3, 4, 570 3 0 6�5 Pprrl e •1: 1..1 j1 . ,. LAND S 064400 �+ H L E TAXABLE $ 970 300 RHU RSSD 5 97,300 STRICHENT 1$ 39912 Rea f .0570 rr - -r-.�rror'2 UNL 1H. RATE 3.9004 76.13r�6,. VP9qa5i5s 7.i1 10TAL TAX 52,527.71 ""■.1w....we. ter■0- •--- -W 14 ,rm ®IYer■®cwfm TOWN' . • ,. SHIPS 2 RANGE 1. . 1 i 2/ 11.!? ACRE, LOT PT 64 ACRES .330 5* EXEMPT #ik OHO 5 100560 STATEMENT `N 39 f3 H 1, R 1 Nashin ton Count Os'lenoh �,.. OI4ER 11121E a AODR, RA015433 � (I 9I A'! I ) TT i 31Rn11 IiALL;��`..�... AA SYSTEM 'I' . 1 i ±4304457,3765. Y � i I..5�, si Ir AMU LAWD'S 10,56) 11NLIH :. RATE PIA 050 tr 3.9004 2 .1 5 Iri 51 1 .,711 i.46d3 i 1 , . `'•; • . 4 : ; • T .... 0F1frrl•r . �N 14 r 3 04TH. C ASSESSED E 1000960 G 11 T RATTE d 7.0702 UETIC050 l'CNRAD R -AND S1TU5s..1)755.. 11 _ �� AT11:'. W. ! RTA�ii0f�i '�l� r III I Rnu !MAR � �o, iEan . :PROP TAX $24622.8'10 T1CARD0 OR 97224 43041 5703 65 .,. d,,,,.E PILL- D, .... A S?, 622:00 PRO4L�S�.i_1.� A5� t d5 CENLAR SERU!CiIrW 6212 43013/0 r rr..I+ . r .. ..w...... . ..'r m,.. 1 r.. it r...:.: 16.. r-..r r rrrrwr r�rrrnx...i+.vM ri... w..i.i. r ._ , vrasn .. .. _rr.sr .._.... r rrr rrr .. J ,, .+�rrr_ t. F 1570 1 1 i = j r'iHC11�f:iT r I IrtPR. S 710190 SCHOOL RATE f 5 . .a , . R U LAND 0 304700 TAX RATE ...26.1356 P.R X' E6 64 Or� .�. U rl ' 251 2DC -o i.e0o . -- .tom TIGARD, OR 97223' D1DTR1CTSs 11 11 1467/613,694905/15014e6110 • LAST YEARS AS ESSEDI 5754070 5 .. � D N , 41Q2 f 1) i 1 3 r..:. .:_ 4000 , . t i 93043) LOT 3 HAHBACi1 PAialt n 7.7.. TAX L - -� rr wE "30,780 STATEIIE)IT di fitiOid bE5*Igil 1111 T2; 5�{9II�'°'rnrr°rc° 1,1X001 F, , !;' ..790 i!111...1hf, RATE 4. OE11 }I.. • � 1l u 0 +A A SYSTEM T E t1 TONKSHIP S2 RANGE (r. Nr�'nlin ton Co +tnl ° Orodan __e.i�.'.�.[11 r.�n P.1 N w�._. �•�U� 63.. atfgw8g..EiflIIr�F,a.a— R2015433 (191820 1�1L5�D� GICRES, LOT PT 6i ACRES .33, ** EXEMPT ** LAND 13125 4 HALL 1AND0T2 I" ; U 100160 STATEMENT �1�I 38913 0.560 SI�� Tt,aRO. aR 97223 C40E 43,41574,65 00000050.0m...0, was. ‘11100.00M001010.1000000.1.00010.1011, NNW. ,a0 ,, VETKOS,RICHRAD P AND 5 119: 14755 SN 84TH CY. AA ®SS�' D S ,10000p,960GOU'T RATE 7.070J i •. , I r I —R1ilJ 3� t 1.8 N PRT•AX $2, 622— 4 HRD, OR 972201 "�' 7' t r ' o r. , r , , AMU IMP T I GARli, OR 97,:24 43, 4, 57, 3, 65 ; y U . A s ► 04 9 — 'TOTAL T.1 S2, G ?2-: 811 YP,i N 0 I4 . 251120C- 0100D. T I GARD OR 97223 Cskamode•M0000. .000 M.. CE6 CENLAR SERUIC1,11 6212 4301370 yR IMPR S 71190 SCHOOL RATE 15:1570 gL 1= ► II _. QU' mine R T 70 DISTRICTS: 1,6e0) 69,9,5,15,34,6F0, RMU LANDS 30 ►780 TAX RATE 26.1356 U r` S PRO T X_ 9i2 649 :03 1/4 ane 1 ' '. LAST YEARS A55E5 1f:Di1�49 itPH - KEY MOIZT: b ?: RI. 4f (153043) LOT 3 HAMBACH PARK 74 t TAX CODES ; a U - N! � _ 0. 80 yQSt Rv1T 2� : i 356 7 rt�.r.�. a Salt, 4:60 _ PFttii�•.l .20 ? �� DE AREAr TAXABLE '6 1192e99t7 UNLI11, a�ITE 3:9i?`'►^r ItF /195W_84TH CY CO .I n .n LAND S 30,780 STATEMENT 0 389.16 ;145504_71,541)8... . SCHOOL RATE 7 a7� z► 023 .,i. X �Ic►675.55 at! ,; I , ........ .. PR6P'CLA55: 10121 HAINV.APEAt 2 RMU ASSD S 102,990 TOTAL TA OT 11AM C P R ,��. 4_..•.�� f3� LAND 5 —Mill 3,080 ,,,,P• �'EMENT 389 i 7 . ,�;�,:, MASSEY, RONALD A t 'SUSAN A SITUS: I'695 S43 134TH . CT ASSESSED S' 99, 490 I?Jf9' T RATE 7 :1,702 l ► h +�""`^�"' , : r , b a r ► ► . I U iPR S 68,710 PROP r kd 1 TAX S2,524.60 43�4a�i'7 ►3o 65 o F► ► AMU I ,.g ,4 OTAL,;TAX :x2,�E�4;60 "' _..._"'""':.• 51',5 �.- :TT5 J �I_ rwme .:wewlapf�tlY •. ��Y ®/J646K'... - .... r,..�...ter,'. .. /IG. {.1'A1101 w - Q -►+ A. S '�..5 TaE" ii ONIi SH i P 5 2.. RANGE I Nmshln tors Caursi, Or ®gon «..rr - -- - . �,�J..i...,,fi�Sp" ..r -rte,. _0 /r -t9 r gyp �p r �It'.. .._.� ; .. , . . r...i„�ido..r Jr-.►�. .irr.om- r . �-e-' ara. A1140116 LAND S 15,700 ATE$'ENT II 39918 4i f 78732 LOT 5 HAHt1ACH PARK 5T '1 1.1, 1 : II: . f ► r i A CODE AREA R ,. f TRXAbLE, 5 ii�i59:1 1��si.IM,�, RATE 3..90 ®4 46 5 5W 84TH CT i 023 r 74 (MX CODE) r .o , RIiU ASSD 91 102 :590 TOTAL Tlx T2,665. 5 AIROP CLNS! 1012 M"•,• AREA. NGERa STEUEN D /JAYNELEN R RIGA i 1, _ II�T1'°°'41"'8T'0 , -�t 1e J romne.rnn -rw.l .ter rl.vinruwmirirwrrwel:.wTr j��`�`�yyee �„ wii wrrwl wtsrwMr1 X !�r� e.rlflL16"+ii7.�W- L'Jilr r_rrr , - „rte O E 1 I/1T'..11 .7p ela nn ----,--- irrrm,..rr. 4 ASSESSED S 98,6000 ,T RAE 7.0702 Ti1S i 14655wS�+ . 84TH CTr ... r�. TA ApL P TA 4. t e ” .. , c r , , R""Rt1lPR S 64 y 400 eA S :50 MK AKE :.... 4p3, )57,1.65! RHU A55Q 1 2 i�, 600,x„ T�.�Ie�.� 1. r. i.Li,- r�w....rr .. � ..,..... ...,........... ... ._ .. ....... .. .. .. .. ..... ...._.. . .ii�ID�rArew+nrrnwa �•w. ...... IMPR 3 10,880 rl 2S1121*02300 PORTLAND, OR 97217 ... i.: :.+1 'wdr w ayrrb n« .: rWl i r «s rawemi"...... ' w SCHOOL RATE 15 +1570 �� ..mow. " TAit SATE 26;1356 r�.,..r,ew.Ci9�"7°FIW�R . i1ri71CTS 1106716910690i505040504, RM LANDS 34,200 81140143 ,196510) Ic AND'. RUTH ANN F :1 D15T PPP LAST YEARS ASSESSED: 578,33 0 LOT6 HitNfRCH PARK� «rreq\ CODE.. AREA: 023,74,,0AX CODE) . + i.i , , 1�ROP CLA55 1+312, H A I N T i,?EA: 2 , I r4I • n,• LAMB S 3412D0 7 0. -la is TAXABLE. " • 102,960 11U4Ajr.'3 4.2 U ASSD 102,960 M3 firm ..:.,;.. STATEMENT 0 30021 SC,0! ..RA _ Sj 570 U LIH RATE' 03.9384 TOTAL TAX x2,674.75 Acerb. .� N1,, ...... 1Tm hiss ton 5 . 4 4 ! , Or ogon ; O A R S Y U T E M TOWNSHIP 5 2 RFNGE I 11" r WAR ygd P b I N . ( 991 {.EUY 821.E FOR R PRO S a- - i 0� 12151 Q..�' ° 2.. MGE X139 ,,�_, , _.. . I��![!!.�.rb 1r l {fie, OI HER 6dAHE A..,, i T.ign— UALUEm �.._,.- • ..Jib AMOUNT „__-. .-. .6A�F .. -,E.�gPwERTK .S r w.;. RII40116 (17873) LOT'S HA"9ACH PARK LANli S 30,780 STATEMENT $ I '1' ,,1, �.,:• �� , x ro T Ix�DLE S 142:590 UN1.1 , Ix...�.. 14675 5 -4TH CT CODE AREAL �._�.. ' (TA.. nE, P M0 RATE 3,9089 �� • MAIPIT•AREAt32•�a r► b PRpROP CLRS�s a 12. RMU ASSO S 102 .',91; TOTAL TAX S2, 665.15 ir „ :- a -' .._.1 ,F . ire I 1ffL 3LI•Q w _.w� 4 no 5TA EM T a "'9 I mo '5411.1.4.1111: ^...12i ar, vo.15/11 ZENG ', S,; +.. j, I . . Sc S 600 UN0U'T RATE 3.0702 TEUcN I! /JAYNELEN R i 1 '5s ^ 4EA5 SW 84TH Cl' C1' ^� ASSESSED N.i. - ..r.r • 0•,: +.i 98 R 43,4•57,3,65 00 PROP TAX $00561.50 annv± �� .bce. I RMU AN�R � TAX S�'.561 ,en �. wS�,fii`"I�.�r�,�AL -."Pay t s • r W W r '>r'.( . ,/ "' PR S 70,880 tHO RATE 15.1570 2SIL2� 1 r S 1M , ! R 1 c:, ,U� Ri . ...-1427n-.--- �� RTLANJ, OR 97217 DISTRICTS: I•67,68,69•gr,I5,34i60 go ,r:l t" - . , , RMU 44014-4.4.........-47444,?, LANI1 S 34,200 TAX SATE 26.1356. 'r ?.9.84 .........r; � LAST YEARS ASSESSEUs $78•330 _..,-,.r.o_„ ..::....mss. R1'40143 9651:)) LOT 8 HAMDACH PARK LAND S 34090 STATEMENT 11 38921 r r I IMPR 3 68,760 ,,,�5CH00L RATE 15.1570 .. mu t�' ' si 1E`f H DEAN, ,�►�� s 146Y ,tl/7r . AN' '0TH ANN. CODE AREA: 023.74 (TAX CODE) TAXA'dLE S 192,960 UNL %. RATE' 3.9084 + , " p1,o `�.�>?e. ��., R U .L S 4- 2 .__. L., ?C. 3 • '_w'�tf' f 01 "' r� � Y 1.�RO!! CLASS: 10121 MAINT AREA: 2 RMU ASSD S 1020960 TOTAL TAX $2,674 75 +yin__ LOT 2 ac Eta $ 34 0 51, TE T N .:38922 , NEUFELO, JOHN A AND SITUS: 14710 SW 84TH.CT ASSESSED S 105,400 GOUT RATE 3.D7d2 • c I' .. , • S . 0 400 ._UN H. , I 43j4,57►3865 OREGON C,1r'rs�OR , _ . �� . r r S 71, 200 PROP TAX S2, 731.13 ..fig.^. �Q 400 �Qf.�l TAX 52,738}13 "97045 , r . , CTY - CITY SAVINGS D,II 8386 9424733 1 —r /MIMEO/ la K 4 w `• 11 �ihlss 15'1 CCnsanly, Oresgon i!'E �Q1FTWrri filUte�:ING.. a.. .... 10 al OR I f ti E TQIaN51 1 P S 2. RFINGE IP. 19914LEUY ^;Ir l�i,�219i . QSPM E �'059Q dt, NER,NAME as 13QDRC'5 � 5 P Y DESC 3) LOT i 0 HAIIBACH PnP L . ND S 34, 200 _ STATEMENT II 38023 Ri 140161 .:(19740 „ �... . T'H1,30 SW .COURT .�'s1�ER1►. COOS. T19 023;74. - T. r ...r.e:a.m......:.:�..r.,:i I i s • r "',°GO 102 T t i 1 r A @� v ' AX. CODE ). r. �.,�._, TAXABLE S 106,700 5L UNLT R 3.9084 ROP�FI.RSSi 101 ^;. HAINT AREA3 2 RHO 455D S 10€0 7100 TOTAL TAX $207 92 04NERSHIP CmANGE ON 10,01,91 iOTi.C:Ft'.,�' 251121'+C -02700 . ice�,,..„, IMPS! e6�h it .r...ro......,: DISTRICTS; i T67, 6E1, 69, 9i 5, 15, 3�F, 6 1 0 LAST YEARS ASSESSED: 58905601 ..................... ww. 91:810 SCHOOL. Rkli E 15•1570 6 °015 GNU':_. (11 , RIO LAND S 340200 200 TAX R(11 "E _ L26.01356 Ar. I Ic . . , - --- . her TIGARD, OR 7224 . 41140189:t170395) -I arl 8355 5H AUI;DQ' It._ NAIiBRCN PARK LOT 12; LAND S 340200 rSTF ERrnr'N 138075 Il L. va.I (USt..0 ,.,:119 rtUtlllra�,I 91 r7a��7aw a i 1 r;0 i,u vuv, • rbnrw .v rvc. CODE AREA: 023.74., (TAX CODE) TAXABLE.. S 117,140 IJNLIM RATE 3.9084' 1.41 11 3 65' PROP GLAS:. 10122' MMA1NT PREAI 2 RMV ASSD S 117.140 TOTAL TAX .... ►r..1.1iB . ' ..... . .LANG s. +� .. STAT HEr1T. 1 3 926 SIT .U. , S ..9325 514 NOUN 5T ASSESSED S MOO ;. I,rOU T RATE 7:0702 4 It COQ. :MA• ....5 '17-14 L ..RAT .3.908'+ 430 . 05703065 RHO IHPR 3 820940 PROP TAX i30D'3:I4 AR w' 2 A U AS D 5 I I7) 140 TOTAL TAX S aL043:14 :p Fr!` n+.rr..' w' .L v1i* re.' Mlwwwww.wdlhA /•..,h .. „ . ®+.r• ..we.1� ip+rinri t3,' JOiil•40 • 0 DEB SA 0 51TUS 8325 5N HAM 5T 43na't ? S IDi2e 241IpONO iJAl3M1 R CODE MR 6'i' �f r TIGARD,; OR 97223 Dy] ■11`r1STRICTS 1 1.67068,69.9.5.15.34•60. 4 I ,_ LAST YEARS ASSESSED: 587.320 .11.x' mM1..�.OM.R11@iu-. w, tl W :! S Y S T E M TOIit'ISH l P 5 R�INCR I Wa0409 1.11 Count , On4000 F R R , PQ+�P�RTY 1.. E 5 •14/0 OF., M. Y RN14021} &96517) ASSESSED 5 117.140 . �1 GOVT • tNT 'Nb RATE i3 u,- 8204 �94Q PROP TAX' S3.043.14 • w,'.UA. }}•d.•Orrr•w..rrwrd 11►1. , INPR S, 80,520 5e udw��w .awr "wwwnw��wwwwd�wrwrwn,'r SCHOOL R6iT 5.I57� —"w U. A 7. 7 ... •TAX :mu 26.1356 RMI� LAND 3' 200 • • -...- PfiQP1:R u� LOT 15 HAHBACM PARK i w :i *�Ir11R1r'wSlf7R• 0'rP " 154705 5W I3RD' CODE .AREA: 023.7 TAXncm _4 yl. LAND TAXABLE S 36,200 S Y t l A.. STATEI4CNT 144:256 UNLIH. RATE 11 T► R►,� 1: PROPr£LASS: 10.42: HAeNT.AREA: 2 RHU ASSD S 1442 :250 TOTAL TAX' x.13�..1c��rr,`I Gi0 S 0 0 38928 3.908+ 2•I $3.695.46 • wwwarlrarrwrw� .rw�w'r'�'"°1°'- '°� -"'w rwiwirrurrr+_rrw� .. . Y wirtr W.rwrCwwrdrwrrAw O It �� 1 ��v.r,rv�+�'I�YiM,66•i.. osrw.ua•wr . �„ '1 j 1 TAXABLE S 22 500 OI�U'T'R�TE '�.070c HAHDIACNO. HAROLD MILDRED Iy CODE AREA: 023. 1ti (TAX CODE) a a� �'' 90 w 69T� PORTLAND, OR 97223 R1140232 096519) SHIRLEY : L ... . r: w PROP k:LASSs ,1002: MAINT..Arcc• ' 2' LOT 11 HAMBACM PARK ZONE R -7 /31%2 :'111 TnrAL TAX �58N��..... {i>'i.iwrri.l rwti �wel•'' rw wwrew LRND i� J 341 r, 200 STATEMENT n • 38930 -�i 94,4 v RA I 7 • mfs TAXABL S 135.312 UNLIH. RATE 3.iCe'� CODS .AREA: 023..74 f �'AX CODE) ti �•, ' POOP CLASS :. i012:..MA1NT ARO: ? ' E SSCSSED S ,1220700 • 'GOI} "T RATE 3,10''02. RMV ASSD "s 135.310 TOTAL TAX S3a5:ii.I7L w �� wdrwruwrdda H cEf31FUU NAL000 KENNETH E ANO SITU5: _.1466Q 5.0 O D:D AUS ! 1' 43;4457.31:165a 13 i �I 0 57 r , , 10131 97223' 03 �5 t a` j PO�tTLAND� �drrr.:rw rrdw r0 179230540 01246 107 rrr�.. IlBC U5 BANCA�r.r...w�_., �' r d it rw.,....0'%i,�l"� `' "' IMPR .. S K 1) t 1 I.i� `wr �^ _ , . hu,! L 251128C-03500 1---Iiiigkiii,cariEL. ND 5 '4680 511.83RD DISTRICTSs 10•�7►a.69,9o5015t34.60. �_ 5 AT YEARS ASSESSED: 3830790 , Jr ; , .,ini..,,...,„aj.,..„,;.„.„.„...„,„_„....,,,,,,,,,,.„,o,,_mLu.1,J:,.,mr.r,,,j,E-L,.JL.e2sLuz:aimgj,.LRJ.,,aisj.,,,,.„...",,,.,„,„„_„:.,a,, .. r..�.r�wr 1 ri r.l 0 E N 0 3103 x`" Cdr 3S, j 1j F�MV IMPR S 88, 500 PRO11- • TAX S31,187 .!\ 1 L . r.rrrR D .... a 6Z,O AL TA I • ' '� rrr..sd rr r:dn r der nrwrw..o- wrr w re•r w rrr .r u.wrw . r wrwri.! -._ _.... ..... . r �. 0 SCHOOL Rif7S 1�5.l571;: 83e521, Up . RA 7.. 70 24i 20{0 TA!.4 RATE 1 Uuazrh 1 n� • • 1 26:1356 rr .:rrw• o .. !lmivaw ®.• ii+r• l .... .. ' r 10rN� 9 s :. iirl:.r.e.ed.iwr l rrr. Wr U+... .'ROl� A RPI Qr R.R•wGW ton CoAn$ r 1}..� TaFN5P 5 RANGE u u E w wrw 205h.�. 65 LOT i3O HAHnACH PAlI1t 1t114��6,9 t9 &„225 CODE AREA} 023.'54 (TAX.COOF.) 5A DRAMR .. .:I3s1��•� " -'1 ...., PRAPBGLAS14! 1012! AtHT�.AREAI '2 1.00 ,14,t00 rV:»STATEHEHT 0 3093Si 7,u ruz i'AXABLE. �� 12!1.0 250 UtALIH, RATE • ';3 :9084 RMU otnv :nrrc al rwb!� Ntti "S3r4'7,9a TAX 530227.E RHO 6550 '� t4■250 TOTAL , ag 'IEARL „•: r;o.,. '. .. ,. .. •• i.rir.wrrrw.IraYwW..�� .wrrmw.�•�•'°!y^'� �`'-"" ', y.{wwrwrdww �rw rrrw.rwrrr . w.ii'dr. wndr ".Ydi.rLe.r wi.ddywW rr rd' -rLr w..idwwri.ridrwwwir �W"w. dr.d`.l+ 1.1 l�L [;�w,r ' i. • d S 3�1 E 0 AEi1T S 89:4 �,;, o, q RIHRt9Fifl �r 14266; i1:83RD DISTRICTS; 147 *66t69,9r 1ISr '1r60a Ir1ARS ASSSi�DrO.r.LIf�..�: W 34x`200 IRK RHit' ,gt• 1.071 • . wl �r,rwru"Ar,r,MMwgwi.rd rrraei:�r «� Yfrrfww,rinLJ.eLrr!,r «« r6ir;uhtrilon .+rrmrn llr. :.w.rrerfr r.rrw,r «.A uri.rJ. «...,.e .+ «wrt,• O A A :S Y ��i T I:' tf. '��dNtdSNIP, �. 2 RA�>;E 1: . . 'Culehl . Artg�!? .. '� � 'e 0 9�' w aNrww��iEw:r� iiLflillibhirli�',.« "� r rte.+ �. ww.m.r ««r «rr wr��' rrrf rrT " «rnr«r« I�,;�i�n ��ef ��r► ,, r ,. � • TA�i AM �,hT k � .11 (\ . , .. n f n n n. ° "+.■ t°cw"r �fmomrw�«�^•'� i. RI 1��0269 .t9�5" ); ',' LOT 20' HAN13ACH PARK N S 34, 200 STAtENENi N 30333. i MORK CODE AREA 023:74'' I TAX CODE) PROP CLASS s.!012:.MCIiMT AREA iv. to DBE i LARRY R 0- 'DALQRCS M S1TU5: 14729SN 83RD MI ' lie r I ► I A, ►o �f 1 �srvs !, . i - =6 r �` ►I Ritl�I�' ?� �r 65r -920 pi�APr:TAX �LEL. cow AA Q 120► 2 �„ 1.>y n 43! 97► 31 � � ...+�� D DEPT OF OE r Qat,♦6ilw16 4 , rl 9.w .3«. 6 ®prY�w. r r rwct� '~u�Lms w warwror.. r ni °«r�mrf►w rwnralm r«ndwyrnli�:wrwwwwrfrr ,6666666.666,666.6.6 (96524t. i wrrrrw:iwrV diwtar,,► rrrww «wrwdwwt. +bwi+vrawwrrrrrerrwr n 11100 S 7�trSOD . ;'SCHOOL RATE , 15�i�r70 2S112BC «OBB�IB 04" . T .. 7 i4""" n IN TAXABLE: 1241 0, IJE911t RATE• 884 R� 6 ISM ! r R1,19:14309 g..144.040. TOTflL r AX S3► 227 x65 fi'r«rrrrr « «rNarrd:Ywrrb..rrrr r;,�1::iFRiiF rton+, WriLrr�j�i erLr, +4�wrr�.,w�+ «wwr:•�rr,Mi�r :� s t «• ,ab "2 TATNi" up: TE 7,07.02 r I 'RG ■r: c ,.,IGt _ i 1 a 1 4IG9RDe OR 97223 DISTRICTS 1b67■68►69b9i5►E5►3r►60� SID Y 200 <<i RATE X6:1356, W 4 �-_ R U I c4.. g y� ,8 `�'WP k 836 M 4 380 LAST YEARS. ASSESSED: S7y•770 7l 7 Q�2 rnv.- �� - « - -- �° ^-.� �'r.^. r.°�':" ra "...■.o"""...."s rahwerw.�.wn'x:.wsww�:■i st.�ra..,rl..« .._. _ RI146295f ,(nn5c5) LQT 23 IIAIBAC. : Po K '; UJ2 •., r S '�J'4k200 ► SSI Tt��a �►;,ENY T � a s JurJ ': , CODE, AREA 023:74 • ?Thar.. TAXABLE S 1 q7• 570' ON 111 ,RTz 04 _ . . y , !<OF CLASSS_101i!'HAINT,Apagr 2 RMDASSa S 117,570 1OTALAk 54►794.53 vF«rLr 413.113 in �rW ,i w+r�r • • �34 ?a "L.: rrai,5vlT u .r T � �w•..i.+.�4iMrt�r .8 Hwrr ns5ES t D s. 1 171320 CJU'T nA'►E 7 n7na MU' `'2► j E CHAEi. J 5 I TUS i 147'60 5G1 BIRD UE U I .. ► I • . N t G � ,. ■ . !. � « a '.nd•.r:�t, .. ' 1'1' ,:4114* r. `y �.� yl f "► ! �, ►�.ti .I ►9► A3't�bb�i 1 I ' 1'b.1�74+ 1'lGARD► OR 972c3 �!3►!4►5��f3f65 . .. RH��PR5Dl�.«.r. bR ►P "PAX S3, 04740 :.. �� .:, �*;�- ` 0' TOTAL ` A13 CNT - $10 aT 11`1NTAL I fit; II 6445 001611 ; .0• • '0. 1'EFFER0 ERNEST HJNANCY F 411•1r0..4 PI ,I PROP•CLASS; 1012 ii5 • ilNT AREA1 2 RMU.A55D $ �D1 g9, 050: �..a.. -. , — PRp¢"11R YF 914.139 • 73,680 TOTAL TOV. 51,914.09 4 J:I sK ,AT eLO I ,,,._._...4 4. "SCiDCTt i'I Imo' 7 4,i7 (ASSESSED S 95.030 GOV.t P5TE 7.01'02 5ITU5t 14518 SW 03R1 CT _ *�xA01.E S 95!p R 4.,,,.a .: R114) Li1:1U i cc,wuv I a , RMU' IMPR r� q2, 230 PROP ... 52`.1468.7!55 pROEL CLr�� L_ 10 l2. FI RISU' AS50 S ."arc.rs.rww■ 4,57,3065, • °0 , '.1:41 EAST -YEARS W55E59t�1i @18 GREAT HESTE,N 03308 ^0 766648 I --1T47570 (93013) 251128C -06900 , 44- TIGARD, OR 97223 DISTRICTS: ,67.68,69r9,5,15,'I4,60 PR 5: 1D T2: MA1'xT.s LAST YEARS ASSESSED: 571,E10 ... - ;.r --im- -YV■SN-' SCM . RATE 38967 Ir GETTY'S EMERALD ACRES EST LOT 3 LAND 5 22°SOP, $TATTEIIE�N 15.196 ,,,•,j � 1423880 ,, t 5'6555) 5 4 �� •"' TAXABLE !i 90: 230 I�NLIN. a�.Ti'E 23. f��ie� CODE sARER1 023.74 (TAX COPE) �Q TOR'f��ANN , I D .6Q�SD°" + ' - � r>� -- RMU_ , N 'r.°"Ri�P°'fR31 ':�°�,�, y r •I 05 I•I' PROP�CLASS: 1012 MAINT AREA: 2 RHO A55D 6 90,230 TOTAL TAX 32,x'► : - mm:�ryY rs...s"..s.... vwnwr..-.w.r.` . L _ 7.0702 SIT115f 14576 SW 03RD CI' ASSESSED 55 115,666: UN01'T RR ATE 3.O ► 1 I ' i TAX S3, 004.6 S 7.r...,._ Crgd" "'" ... IMPR_ S 61,710 toot. RATE 15.1570 ,RMU LAND S 34,200 TAai RATE 26.1356 RMU��1P _a!� n.;,,. PROP TAX S2, 4 .1.60 r 1 LIEIaMAN. ALAN i !`PANCINE • If 43• 4 57, I 1 , 3•65 • • 419 URF •11 3820 03- 40t- 243267 -2 9 5 RMU IMPR 5 92, 860 PROP 1• ,w -. «, A. H S Y S T E M SAN R�A�NGE I C , Oi• on qi (� PMT, Gs °- jitzt;h7tlaagyata.lki -rY RO ..rR 1R ?R P. i I5 5 �� 199 -1, •, _,...• °-" .. _.. ..N Ri42 8 c182611) GETTY'S EMERALD ACRES EST LOT 5 ��. _ _ I II NAR I , ,Xi L ' 14598„.54 D 1 JEELIN'X• ICE NIL A2, ! CODE AREA; 023..74 ITAX.CODE) PROP' CLRS5a,10$2; MAINT AREA; 2 LAND 32, U90 STATEIIEtI 19 3896'4 r � CiOt1L T,. IS I ' TAXABLE_, S 370490 UNLIM MATE "3.v08f. RYU ASSD S 370490 TOTAL TAX 597,3.94 } ..w -u.w -• GOT ']8 . - ► ;,.,,,��,5 EI'� "a. s, �rac'c �K7 t -A4 6 .. ► . E55FD S 101,310 GOV RATE 7 +0702 A AND TAHI D 5lTUStQi4o16.S4�! 83p3 CT .., A5S � -• 4. II A I :. • o • •., , `r i t , ' rtriU IMPR 5 781510 pF,JP tAX E �S2rl .90 43, 4, 570, 65 � : _ ► , : ... ". R.. � i 01.....� }:a�...�: X S� r�O.wa- t. I IMPR S 721740 SCHOOL RATE 15.151 106700k069,9050150340600 67 R DISTICTS: 1,►,,r15t15,3i+r60, R LAN0D TIGARD. OR 97223 699 LAST YEARS 1A5SES EDi 575;580 S 22 :800 TAX RATE 26," "356 k 72� 4D . _. PRO . AX 72 .413j.• 1 oiai (4r 1423055.. t 6561 'i GETTY ' S EMERALD oiCRES EST LOT 8 I APR:,�au S 2t, 000 LA ,, r CODE .PREAi 3023:.74.,.0TAX CODE) TA ADLE S 88:480 i1NLIQ1. RATE ,.3:9074' 19.�,1 2 I' 6., 14652:'.u4 . 83RI3 . T . , L , i 1012:.IIA I NT ., AREAt 1 RMU ASST' S. 88, 409! TOTAL TOO S2::298 :6 PROP CLAS5 . ASSESSED S 9510 0 ,60V9 RAM 7.0702 U � 0.....m.a» ' "�' 'rAX 50►�469.03 119,11 . S 70240 PROP TAX 52:469.03_ FES A SD S �".. -• StATEHF. *T l 38972 444, E JOANNE SITUSt il+547.S44 03RD.CT C I st � _.� ......,.w. ..r 4304.057o 3, 65 .. PPP - PAC S C FIRST F; L 3544 01+4013 __ :.-. :rte«.:..- :..:.:.�..r..r....- w...,...r." + I A • o-• • Nnshin' (o>t Coun �..t1Ala+a4 °�w cm,eoen 15 ��'• •` " TOWNSHIP 5 2 RANGE OAR SY5 ?EM TOWNSHIP , _ g 20600.. • •1 1 , " "0" ' ANtl ROD EG5 --- -PBOPl R7 -• r I YIO 1 EXZELLQLS UALUES ,:s..1. " AI-12M---------- ....�.r�llidWES..�� --- -�• -- ".� Z�� 64p STAfEREN,T 9i ! 3897�b 90423873 ($54272) GETTY'S Ei1ERA ►.A ACRES EST LOT IO LW S � - X9")1 rr, r � e i V i t t 1 t TAXABLE S 98► 490 U!i4 , RRAATt. 3,410.131 CODE AREAL 023.74 (TAXyCODE) ��4523 5H, 83RD CT , r t�,,,,raa, n,=. ,0�- 93"24,, _ .'' , R' TAX �.rti C 1, S, RF1 ASSD IS 90, 49E PROP CLASS: 10121 MAINT AREA: 2 — ...- ---- -. S 4 7 gm 5 t .1. tt 3897 " �55R55ED 32,233,290 GOUT RATE 7.0702 e 'AN ET AL � ,.�.., r� WHITE: �'��.s Nt�i'Ci� N[ 5I T�1. ;` �p� RHU WI( S1,815:54 PROP TAX. 558, 017.75 �"-- ` ~, ' + RnU g TOTAL TAX 358, 017.7 34 NW 15 T DISTRICTS; [r67,68�69►9r5r, iS,:4.1G(D, PO @T AND S - .972Q9"_,r". i , LAST YEARS R T ti IRAN AMSSESS %I6ut 99 ?00x n0 ki , : „ , .� S 1 2134 f 965;5 1., O8RC ZONE = RU -020 LAND 4'090 STATEMENT 11 38976 RA TAXA`LE 3 93, 00 UNL I M. RATE . 3.9084 1Ei W CODE AREA: 0223,7 ' X CODE) T%i `"0 NT AREA s 2 0 0 TOTAL. ;VAX 52i 432. �e3 y . . PROP CLASS; 1012; MATS AREA ASSD S 99,64 s ; HALO; ROBERT W OWLET ML 51 LIABILITY LOTS 40, 41, 52 11720 S4 1.1:114N CG�DE AREA: 0'23.74 (TAX CODE) RHO SPEC S 1,590 PROP TAX S2,214.97 r. rt,�,..rartn. A g7� ?�,.I.j' R9II��3 ' RS • 5032; MAINT AREA: 2 AMU ASSD 5 85,300 P;aOP CL...�5. 503 . L•No SP 111PR. 5Io . ST T t GOUT 5 8 n 4L 5 46,660 M .NT 0 38977. 7,0702 3.9034 RATE . RAT 6r.sirr•r _... , f• 1.' *n` ITY FARM DEFERRAL rri J 5 0WM51lP 5 2 RANGE1 .. 1 •1 `.5RYP9 T ,� 10.1 s2 91 05 i RNG p . WAshiti la,n.Catint r Oregon 6'°.° _,,. °nom i.f;Mq 5PECS 10 9_ Q STATERENi` q 31578 DURNAM A RE5 LOTS .39, 42: WSAC , � „ 8512056 .- t 96557 •� FARHLRN0 0IE11T t AL_, �r..s i g � UNL I H : RATE 3 :9084 550 :41 w n X25 _ x1»1:1: :ss.ssT RMU5PECS x.GORNNTT, JACQUELINE TR ST ACRES: 3.75 9.. DISTRICTSt. „1,67x68169,915,1$441 60, M : TIGARDIHOR "�7r,.23 " aa C MMLO, ROBERTW AtltI_U pLET. LAST YEARS ASSESSED; .:31 i 910 DURHAM ACRES ZONE n RU4 IP1PR. S 41,9E8 TOTAL TA. GOU l T RATE 7.070s. r �:1 + ' CODE AI�CrI t 023 :711 ' ?ROP TAX S1,3.0.17 1 (TAX:CCOEl RN 5PEt 5 46D RU , Il720 5W LYNN _ .. .:. .. _._ � , . , , , .. RMU A55q 52; X80 -R6F CLASS : 7032: -11AINT -AREA: 2 LIABILITY FARM DEFERRAL �,. - .. - �•, - :_......•,• , e r � .4 :a 2BD -00600 ARHLANDrOTENT[pL 4 Q DITt0y L TAX AN s40Q00 SCHOOL E 95.°3:1570 .... . S : 4*40 G0114 T 5o ".....` .� •-'- i 119151 f 1�775r. Si�:..Z6T14 ,.E. 5, 7M11 BS 74o i AX. RATE 26 r 1 356 • 11 _ TAXABLE S ..300. _ .. RR PM . 52.227 40 I `. 5N R' ' CQQp , pry 1 1. RMU IMPR S 145 _4 0 , ...r:: OR 97�i'.3 DIET A , .0 0.....'w.' 6 r° P43o4;57psv65 .. AR A � , 85p y14D ,i 2 tsr�'Lt�an. 41a1sh In 1r�n ` „C_ n�n! . o argon SYSTEM 0 OR i.Y� SY 5 T E 9 ONNH 2 RE PR. �. � ....,...e.o...a..o._,.�.:=a -.-; ,n , ruiurww�r— :.. R511627 (96390) RTS 17523 303875 .40AC D 14300 514 14300 81.1 ' ':. ” ►. B ' •- � „1�.Z o�.. .moo.. MR S I TUS: 114300 SO HALL BLVD an.v e i 43,4,571%65 LAND S 300700 BTATEPENT SI 38397 4 H 1 H' R'T I •J .., 71,230 UNLHMI. RATE 3,9084 ?4.13 6_ TAXABLE S RMU ASSD S 0 7-I TAX RA 71.230 -----------41Hi ' : ', ? 501-3.— ,71NONNONNIMOIMMIRM.211.1••••■•■•■• "mal........00=1•1011==.11.MMinia..oleI AMON. AM i $ 4 990 SWAT RENT a 3879E0 ASSESSED S 113,1 40 GQU'T RATg 7.0702 U • S 1 , C4 UNL� RA 90fd r .T% • RMU !NPR $ 38,150 PROP TAX S2, 744.33 TibR(R i DISTRICTS: Ir67►68,19e9 >5,15034,G0, , RMU A SD S_ _ 13 140 Tt�l,� T� A ��.a2, 74�r .3i LAST YEARS ASSESSED: $88,090 7,500 •mow Mir.0 ww rd /..�J.. r�N' . 1 ��{�{� . 251141B -04000 ) EDGEWOOD MANOR 40 UNITS Y`��{� TOTAL TAX 510850.47 HAAS, f'rOMAN MARY BELLE 54`7 S!4 CAMERON CODE AREA: 023,74 (TAX CODE) � .I...PO T O • ` D C 6741j1L941 5>, a� , PROP'CLASS: 7012a_HAINT AREA 2 d 1 : r : 4 1 , A. .. a •, - R F'.r1 9ROSSEAU, WALLACE I 251IPMB -04200 Vd'1 9 W,ON►T TIGARD OR 97224 •'1 IMPR S 929,290 SCHOOL RATE 1 ► 15.1570 7.r7 2 o RMU LAND S 153080 TAX RATE ;9!2826.1 356 RMU IMRR S 9 29�I90 13645 . y ' ...' T �Gi71fri e � 2 '7 •, _ 0 Opt 11 /3800 !: ND T. 54 070 STATEMENT ASSESSED 5 105,150 GOUT RATE 0702 _ s 4 SW BO,' A RI TAXAB E . 5 105. 151 UNL I M . RATE 3 41 • M : 1, • " - -1 .1 ` I " 'j'E°"'°'..'. 74"�' "5 DISTRICTS: I s b'7, 68, 5+ 34, 60 ► RMU II M 51 Ti PROP L TAX S2° 731.65 69r9,5,I 4 ,. ®�.�a.,.wr,� Rl U ASS 5 I 0 LAST YEARS ASSESSED: $83,260 v (ACRES: .56 51TU5: CODE AREA: 023.74'. (TAX CODE) 4 iF, ,'aV� PROP CLA s t ..101.2. MAINT AREA: 2 �'.. ,•. .. ,r.wdtwrawAYinLs�.wIM./�.iuil HA010 lah Conn! , Or.egoh .♦ 2 1 11 R . 5 i06,610 SCHOOL RATE 15.1570 1!E10I1 GI�' T RAT 'Y 702 mina 1 T 5356 R j 3 658,04 1 • 1 TOTAL. l Rx ;6a5�'.'i O A A , S Y 5 T E.`.PI TOWNSh:°' S 2 RANGE I i 99 L.EU R011: FOF! R pRpPERT y PAGae __ . -_ .. i ,r w .rlw.i .iwrlrewp.iyrwMwbdusw . rr.w.•i.rwWwwswi i • PA . SCR I ;.:,�� :�,�...s'' �,,..... TA7� AHf -i1NT f]WNEi3�fld� F117 AI ' ' `" .' ,5� ' E ,«• a�.l • _ .�r,�.ow� - RATE . rye LAND S 27 700 . STATEMENT 0 00: F!5 1 1538 1 96394) ACRES .2'� P _.. 46..37 _ , SCHOOL .. av Kai i .,. y_ -- a.a TA A76 ►LG $ (4o d!0 yid a RATE 3 �',c� • ,.2.,. 26.948► ill 0252 5 RAAD t . , 12525 SW .,. A1N =...e1 i x;.511 8L11�iTA. RD.,.. 1 T X .RAT r St i ,75 2'7.7 RMU ASSD S 74410 TOTAL TAX $19924o21 l :, 43i 405 ' 3,;5 ROSE. JEAN,IE T i.GAkfl, 0 ►►A rki ► ACRES: • P .�^ P HI TIGARB, OR 9722' • i1•' LA a a AS5 :SSED S 10U,540 0 40.E RMU ,I11PR 5 73, .1 40 RHU._ ASSD 5', 108 540 p lflsii•.ilp M� 35r4t)O>t.- VAT 5T E�iE�1T !�. • . 3i)80� � G0U r 'RATE `I.07P PA —1,9001— PROP TeX 2, 019'd7i TOTAL TAX„ „„5 , ,8.1, s7i J. r: 1 C�' ST JL OTA COMMENTS DAB g PROM Tigard Planning Department R• (NWO ir) h request for appa, ... g dev�► to ent divide parcel a oneie i g Of Pp oval of the following 1 approxaimatels 1.55N�ac acres into �11r lots between approximately 4,000 0 and' 7,, 2250 square feet, 2) Variance approval to allow development of a c :1 -de- sac local street to exceed 400 feet whereas Code section 18.164.OJ10 (K) snit ► d -+sac length of 400 feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW allows a �aucinnum cul-de-sac 18.54, 18. 88, 18.100, O.1TE tIAs Comte g Development Code Chapters . 18.102, 18.108, 18.134, 18.31s1), 18.160, and 18.164. LOCATION: 14600 SW Hall Boulevard (WCTZ4 251 1250,, tax lot 1600) ZONE; R-12 (Residential, 12 units /acre) The A -12 zone allows single family atteched /detached residential " units, multiple- family residential units, reaidentia1 care facilities, mobile home parka and subdivisions, public support nervicPoa, family day c are, home occupations, temporary uee, and acceeiory structures a a ng other e ®e. Attached its tha Site Plan anct applicant's to em n agencies r y u r and view . ®r. . information supplied by various departs. information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the 'yproposa1 in the near future* If you wish to comment on this application we need your comments by M. 14, 19924 You may use the specs- provided below or atta' ; a separate ? ett ►r to return your cents. .,_,.W. me 1�. . poeave pricide the staff contact noted btelowwith ®ourrcomanents and cona`iz e u 1®aHpnte in Writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this Batter, contact the Tigard 1C Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 LAW Halt slvdo Tigard, OR 97223. PHONEz 639- 4171. STAFF co tort Jett Offer moo.... }.� PLEASE CHECK THE 3 'OLLOWING ITS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to i t 0 Please contact Of one office. Please ref r to the ;unClosed latter. Written Comments: T . . Name of Person dentw'h i� Phone Numbers ;Am/60392-0 k A1n 3 1: CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY HEARINGS OFFICER 1. Concerning Case Number(s): SUB 92- 0009 /VAR 92 -0017 2. Name of Owner: Dr. Carlos Starling Name of Applicant: Same 3. Address 15962 Boones Ferry Rd. City Lake Oswego State OR Zip 97035 4. Address of Property: 14600 SW Hall Blvd. Tax Map and Lot No(s).: 2S1 12BC, tax lot 1600 5. Request: A request for approval of the following development applications: 1) Subdivision approval to divide a parcel consisting of approximately 1.55 acres into 11 lots between approximately 4,050 and 7,250 square feet; 2) Variance approval to allow development of a cul -de -sac local street to exceed 400 feet whereas Code section 18.164.030 (K) allows a maximum cul -de -sac length of 400 feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.134, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164. Zone: R -12 (Residential, 12 units /acre) The R -12 zone allows single family attached /detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivisions, public support services, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. 6. Action: Approval as requested X Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall, and mailed to: X The applicant and owner(s) X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON September 18, 1992 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(B) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee ($315.00) and transcript costs (varies up to a maximum of $500.00). The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. September 18, 1992 10. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639 -4171. bkm /SUB92- 09.BKM BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF 1IGARD. OREGON Regarding an application by Roger Edwards for approval ) FINAL ORDER of a preliminary plat for an I I -Io1 subdivision for land ) east of SW Hall Boulevard south of SW Bonita Road ) SUB 92 -0009 in the R -12 zone in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Starlings Crossing) 1. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a preliminary plat to divide about 1.55 acres into 11 lots in the R -12 zone (Residential, 12 units per acre), a variance to the maximum permitted length of a cul de sac, a variance to the maximum permitted lot depth to width ratio for two proposed lots, and an adjustment to solar access standards for new development. Proposed lots comply with the dimensional and density requirements of the zone, except for the lot depth to width ratio of two proposed lots. About 73% of the proposed lots comply with the solar access standards for new development. The site abuts SW Hall Boulevard and Bonita Road, but no direct vehicular access to those streets is proposed. The applicant proposes to dedicate right of way for and to improve the Hall Boulevard frontage as directed by the State of Oregon Highway Division and to dedicate right of way for and to improve to City standards an extension of SW 83rd Court from the east edge of the site to a cul de sac on the site. All lots will have direct vehicular access exclusively to SE 83rd Court on the site. Public sanitary and storm sewers and water lines will serve each lot. On -site storm water quality features are not proposed. A public hearing regarding the application was held on August 31, 1992. City staff recommended conditional approval of the subdivision. The applicant accepted the staffs recommended conditions of approval. After discussion, the applicant agreed to modify the preliminary plat so that all proposed lots comply with the lot depth to width standard. No one else testified about the development. LOCATION: East of and adjoining SW Hall Boulevard south of and adjoining SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S1 12BC, Tax lot 16(X1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Medium Density Residential ZONING: R -12 (Residential, 12 units/gross acre) APPLICANT: Roger Edwards, represented by Alpha Engineering OWNER: Dr. Carlos Starling SITE AREA: About 1.55 acres APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Ch. 18.54, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164; Resolution and Order 91 -47; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditionally approve in part and deny in part HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION: Conditionally approved in part and denied in part Page / - Hearings Officer dectsu n SUB 92 -0009 (Starlings Crossing) II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Section II of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated August 31, 1992. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the approval standards in Section III of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated August 31, 1992. IV. HEARING, TESTIMONY, AND NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS A. Hearing. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein received testimony at the public hearing about this application on August 31, 1992. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. B. Summary of oral testimony. 1. City Planner Jerry Offer testified for the City. He summarized the staff report and recommendation. He recommended one change in the proposed conditions of approval. After considering the dimensions of the lots and the applicable criteria, he withdrew the recommendation for approval of the variance to the lot depth to width ratio and urged the Hearings Officer to deny that variance. 2. Randy Clarno testified for the applicant. He accepted the conditions recommended by City staff with the change proposed by Mr. Offer. After discussion with his client, Mr. Offer, and the Hearings Officer, he withdrew the request for the lot depth to width variance and agreed to modify the preliminary plat to comply with that standard. C. NPO and Agency Comments. The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the NPO and agency comments in Section IV of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated August 31, 1992. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. Compliance with Community Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the findings about compliance with the Community Development Code and Comprehensive Plan in Section V of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated August 31, 1992, except the finding regarding the proposed variance to CDC section 18.164.060(A)(1)(b)(maximum lot depth to width ratio). Instead, the Hearings Officer finds that, although granting the lot depth to width ratio variance may have certain benefits, lots 10 and 11 can each be widened by about 2 -t /2 feet so that they comply with the lot depth to width standard in CDC section 18.164.060(A)(1)(b) without reducing the number of lots in the subdivision. A variance to this standard is not necessary for the proper design or function of the subdivision and is not necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right, and such a variance does not comply with CDC section 18.160.120. A condition is warranted requiring the preliminary plat to be modified accordingly. Page 2 - Hearings Officer decision SUB 92 -0009 (Starlings Crossing) B. Compliance with Resolution and Order 91 -47. The applicant can comply with Resolution and Order 91 -47 by paying a fee in lieu of building an on -site storm water quality facility. VI. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The Hearings Officer visited the site and surrounding area. VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION The Hearings Officer concludes that the proposed preliminary plat, solar access adjustment, and cul de sac length variance comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected agencies and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the Hearings Officer hereby denies a variance to the maximum lot depth to width ratio and approves SUB 92 -0009 (Starlings Crossing), a variance to the maximum cul de sac length standard, and an adjustment to the solar access standards for new development, subject to the conditions of approval recommended in the August 31, 1992 Staff Report, with the following amendments: 1. The first sentence of Condition 9 is hereby amended to read as follows: 9. Additional right of way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the SW Hall Boulevard frontage to increase the right of way to a maximum of 60 feet from centerline, with the width of dedication to be determined by the Highway Division... 2. A new condition 19 is hereby imposed to read as follows: 19. Before approval of the final plat, the applicant shall modify the preliminary plat so that no lot exceeds a maximum depth to width ratio of 2.5:1. The applicant may adjust lot lines as necessary to accomplish this purpose, provided all lots continue to comply with applicable dimensional requirements of the R -12 zone. DATED This day of S 1efi ber, 1992. Larry Epstein, - ari Of cer Page 3 - Hearings Officer decision SUB 92 -0009 (Starlings Crossing) i f AGENDA ITEM 2.1 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Dr. Carlos Starling for STAFF REPORT for a subdivision consisting of approximately 1.55 SUB 92 -0009 acres located at the southeast corner of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Bonita Road. I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST CASE: Subdivision SUB 92 -0009 SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval of: 1) subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide a 1.55 acre parcel into 11 buildable lots ranging in size between 4,050 and 7,250 square feet; 2) Variance approval to allow development of a cul -de -sac local street to exceed 400 feet whereas the code allows a maximum cul -de -sac length of 400 feet; 3) Variance approval to lot depth to width ratio for two lots. APPLICANT: Roger Edwards OWNER: Dr. Carlos Starling 4500 SW Kruse Way One, #180 15962 Boones Ferry Rd. Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R -12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) LOCATION: Southwest corner of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Bonita Road. (WCTM 2S1 12BC, tax lot 1600) APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54.050, 18.88.040(C)(1)and(E), 18.92.020, 18.150.020(E), 18.150.030(A), 18.160.060, 18.160.120, 18.164, Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to conditions. II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Site size and shape: The subject parcel contains 1.55 acres. The site is generally square in shape with approximately 240 feet of frontage on SW Bonita Road and approximately 229 feet on SW Hall Boulevard. B. Site location: The site is located on the southeast corner of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Bonita Road. HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 1 C. Existing uses and structures: The subject parcel is largely undeveloped. A single family residence and outbuilding are located on the southern portion of the property. Vegetation consists of indigenous grasses, a residential yard, and a few trees located south and eastern portion of the site. D. Plan designation and zoning: The site and properties located to the north are zoned R -12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) and designated as medium- density residential on the Comprehensive Plan map. Properties to the south and west are zoned R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre) and are designated low - density residential on the Comprehensive Plan map. To the east are properties zoned R -7 (Residential, 7 units per acre) which are also designated as medium density residential. E. Surrounding land uses: Single family homes are located directly to the east,south, and west of the subject site. An apartment complex is located directly north of the site across SW Hall Boulevard. F. Proposed use: The applicant proposes to divide the site into eleven buildable lots ranging in size from 4,100 to 7,250 square feet in size as illustrated on the preliminary plat. The lots are intended for single family residential use. G. Public services and utilities: The preliminary utility plan proposes the installation of a storm drainage system heading north from the new terminus of SW 83rd Court along the common property line of lots 8 and 9 and connecting to SW Bonita Road. There is an existing public sanitary sewer line located within SW 83rd Court which has the capacity to accommodate this development. The applicant is proposing to connect to and extend this sanitary sewer line to serve this development. H. Streets and access: The proposed development has frontage on SW Hall Boulevard and SW Bonita Road. Southwest Hall Boulevard is classified as an arterial on the City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. Southwest Hall Boulevard is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation. The applicant has shown on the preliminary plat an intent to dedicate right -of -way to 60 feet from centerline and install half- street improvements. SW Bonita Road is classified as a major collector and is fully improved along the frontage of the site. HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 2 III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Community Development Code. 1. Chapter 18.54.050 contains standards for the R -12 zone. A single - family detached residential unit is a permitted use in the zone. Detached single - family residential lots in the zone must comply with the following dimensional requirements: Minimum lot size 3,050 square feet Front setback 15 feet Garage setback 20 feet Interior sideyard setback 5 feet Corner sideyard setback 10 feet Rear setback 15 feet Maximum building height 35 feet 2. Chapter 18.88.404(C)(1) contains solar access standards for new residential development. A lot meets the basic solar access lot standard if it has a north -south dimension of 90 feet or more and has a front lot line that is oriented within 30 degrees of a true east -west axis. A subdivision complies with the basic requirement if 80% or more of the newly created lots meet or exceed this standard. 3. Chapter 18.92.020 contains standards for density. The number of dwelling units permitted is based on the net development area, excluding sensitive land areas and land dedicated for public roads or parks, or for private roadways. This land area is then divided by the minimum parcel size permitted by the zoning district to determine the number of lots which may be created on a site. 7. Chapter 18.150.020(E) requires a permit and contains standards for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter measured four feet above the ground on undeveloped residential land. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria as specified in Chapter 18.150.030(A): a. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; b. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; c. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; d. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space; e. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 3 _ V f. New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any. will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. 8. Chapter 18.160.060(A) contains standards for subdivision of parcels into 4 or more lots. To be approved, a preliminary plat must comply with the following criteria: a. The proposal must comply with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the applicable zoning ordinance and other applicable ordinances and regulations; b. The proposed plat name must not be duplicative and must otherwise satisfy the provisions of ORS Chapter 92; c. The streets and roads must be laid out so as to conform to the plats of subdivisions and maps of partitions or subdivisions already approved for adjoining property as to width, general direction and in all other respects unless the City determines it is in the public interest to modify the street or road pattern; and d. An explanation has been provided for all common improvements. 8. Chapter 18.160.120 contains standards for the approval of a subdivision variance. These criteria are: a. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property which are unusual and peculiar to the land as compared to other lands similarly situated; b. The variance is necessary for the proper design or function of the subdivision; c. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to the rights of other owners of property; and d. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right because of an extraordinary hardship which would result from strict compliance with the regulations of this title. 9. Chapter 18.164 contains standards for streets and utilities. a. Section 18.164.030(A) requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of the street. b. Section 18.164.030(E) requires a local street to have a minimum 50 -foot right -of -way and 34 -foot paved section between curbs and sidewalks. HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 4 c. Section 18.164.060 prohibits lot depth from being more than 2; times the lot width and requires at least 25 feet of frontage on a street other than an alley. d. Section 18.164.070 requires sidewalks adjoining all residential streets. e. Section 18.164.090 requires sanitary sewer service. f. Section 18.164.100 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements for storm drainage facilities. B. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. 1. Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development review process. 2. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard urban planning area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. 3. Policy 7.1.2 provides the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and utilities placed underground. 4. Policy 7.3.1 provides the City will coordinate water services with water districts. 5. Policy 7.4.4 requires all new development to be connected to an approved sanitary sewer system. 6. Policy 8.1.1 provides the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. 7. Policy 8.1.3 provides the City will require as a precondition of approval that: a. Development abut a dedicated street or have other adequate access; b. Street right -of -way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; c. The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs, sidewalks to City standards within the development. d. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 5 e. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. IV. NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS 1. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and offers the following comments: A. Streets: The site is located on the southeast corner of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Bonita Road. Southwest Hall Boulevard is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The applicant has shown on the preliminary plat dedication of right -of -way to 60 feet with half - street improvements. The State (ODOT) has recommended that the applicant be required to provide half - street improvements and dedication of Right -of -Way to 60 feet from centerline along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard. The Engineering Department agrees with these recommendations and, as shown on the preliminary plans, the applicant is proposing to comply with these requirements. Southwest Bonita Road is classified as a major collector and is fully improved along the frontage of the site. Therefore, no additional requirements are necessary. The applicant is proposing to extend SW 83rd Court to serve this development. Southwest 83rd Court is classified as a local street. The applicant is proposing to provide full street improvements for the extension of SW 83rd Court within this development. Additionally, the applicant has requested a variance to the length of the 83rd Court cul -de -sac. Community Development Code Section 18.164.030(K) allows a maximum cul -de -sac length of 400 feet. The applicant is proposing a length of approximately 465 feet. Based on the existing road patterns and location this site, this extension of SW 83rd court is a logical extension of an existing road which allows for appropriate development of the site. There is no suitable alternative access point for this parcel. Therefore, the variance should be approved. B. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer line located within SW 83rd Court. The applicant is proposing to connect to and extend this sanitary sewer line to serve this development. This sanitary sewer line has sufficient capacity to serve this development. C. Storm Drainage: The applicant is not proposing to extend any portion of the existing public storm sewer system located in SW Hall Boulevard or SW 83rd Court. HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 6 Based on the information presented by the applicant, it appears that the existing system was designed to accommodate this development. The applicant should be required to submit evidence that the existing system does in fact have adequate capacity and was designed to accommodate this development. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. Construction of an on -site water quality treatment facility is not appropriate because the site is small in comparison to the development plan. Additionally, the loss of area for the on -site facility would preclude the effective development of this site. The requiring of surface water quality facilities on small sites would result in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the City. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities and there are no natural depressions or other areas of this site that are particularly suitable for such a facility. Regional facilities, funded by fees in -lieu of construction of these facilities, would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and less maintenance. Therefore, the applicant should be required to pay the fee in -lieu of constructing an on -site facility. 2. The City of Tigard Building Division has noted that a demolition permit will be required for the removal of the existing buildings. The septic tank shall be pumped out and filled in or completely removed. An inspection shall be obtained after the tank is filled or removed. A copy of the receipt from the pumping company shall be provided. If the building is connected to the public sewer the line shall be properly capped -off, and inspected by the City. Private storm drains shall be provided as indicated on the plans for lots 1 through 4. Easements shall be provided where crossing other lots. The minimum pipe size of a private rain drain shall be 6 inches when serving 3 -6 houses. A joint access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded with each lot accessing a private storm drain as follows: Lots 1 through 4 shall have an equal right to use and an obligation to operate and maintain the private drainage facilities within the private or public drainage easements as shown. 3. Tigard Water District does not object to the extension of a cul -de -sac street which exceeds 400 feet in length. However, the Water District requests that the developer provide for a 10 foot waterline easement to SW Hall Boulevard to be located between lots 5 and 6. The District also requests that the developer extend the proposed 6 -inch waterline along the easement and connect to the existing 12 -inch water main of the east side of SW Hall Boulevard. In addition to this request, the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue District has also requested that a fire hydrant by installed within the project for fire protection. The existing fire hydrant at SW Bonita Road and SW Hall Boulevard will most likely be unusable due to the fencing of private property along SW Hall Boulevard and SW Bonita Road. HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 7 4. The State of Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has noted that half - street improvements shall be required along the Hall Boulevard frontage. A permit for this work shall be required from ODOT. Additionally, the applicant should provide a right turn lane from Hall onto SW Bonita Road in conformance with the Citys' Traffic Plan. 5. General Telephone has requested that the developer contact GTE Engineering at least 30 days prior to trench opening. 6. Tigard School District 23J notes that the proposed development lies within the attendance areas of Phil Lewis Elementary School, Fowler Middle School, and Tigard Senior High School. The proposed development is projected to generate the following additional enrollment at those schools: 3 students at Metzger Elementary School; 2 students at Fowler School; and 1 student at Tigard High School. The School District states that school capacities are exceeded. However, core facilities are sufficient to consider portable classroom additions. 7. The City of Tigard Operations Department, Northwest Natural Gas, Portland General Electric, and the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. 8. NPO 5 reviewed this proposal prior to the applicant's submittal. NPO 5 stated that this was a good proposal and that they appreciated being able to review a plan that showed the setbacks and allowable building envelopes. 9. NPO 6 recommends that the City pay close attention to sight distance at the intersection of Bonita and Hall. Also, that staff should ensure that setbacks for the buildings are adequate. Staff should also remember that the speed limit on Hall Boulevard is 45 mph. It was also recommended that NPO 5 absorb the density loss due to building at a lower density and not building apartments. In response, staff would like to assure NPO 6 that adequate setbacks shall be verified and maintained through the building permit process. Visual Clearance standards will not be violated by the City, nor will they be permitted by any developer or private land owner /occupant. Should the standards be violated by a developer or private land owner /occupant, the City shall undertake standard Code Enforcement procedures to correct the situation and see that the violation is corrected. The 45 mph speed limit on Hall Boulevard is not proposed to be adjusted by this application. This speed limit shall apply to all persons driving along this roadway. The lot sizes /density specified by each of the zoning districts in the City are stated as maximum densities allowed. The R -12 zoning designation applied to this site allows for the creation of a maximum - of 1 residential dwelling unit for every 3,050 square of developable land. The City does not require that all land be developed at the most dense configuration possible. The Metropolitan Housing Rule (OAR 660, Division 7) requires that the average density allowed for all developable residential land within the City's original planning area be a minimum of ten dwelling units per acre. This application would not HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 8 reduce the City of Tigard's housing opportunity index below its minimum ten units per acre of inventoried residential land, nor would this reduce the multi - family housing mix below the 50% minimum of multi- family units pursuant to the Metropolitan Housing Rule. The City's acknowledged plan in 1984 inventoried 1,311 acres of developable residential land in the City and the estimated housing opportunity index was 13,110 units. Since then, eight plan amendments have been approved which in turn have amended the inventory. Therefore, the City's current inventory includes 1,290 developable acres and a housing opportunity for 13,112 units (10.16 units per acre). The building of 11 single family homes, rather than approximately 17 houses or apartments, would reduce the housing opportunity index by only 6 units. This does not reduce the City of Tigard's housing opportunity index below the minimum 10 units per acres on inventoried residential land, nor reduce the multifamily housing mix below the 50% minimum pursuant to the Metropolitan Housing Rule. Therefore, an approval of this proposal would not necessitate the replacement of any lost housing opportunities elsewhere in the City. 10. Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) has reviewed this proposal and has stated that an erosion control plan in conformance with the Agency's R &O 91 -47, Chapter 5, as amended by 91 -75, and consistent with current construction guidelines, should be required. All new public storm and sanitary sewer designs shall conform to the Agency's R &O 91 -47, Chapter 3, as amended by 91 -75. USA also recommends the installation of an on -site water quality facility. However, the City may determine if such a facility is appropriate to the site, or alternatively, if a fee -in -lieu of shall be acceptable. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. Compliance with Community Development Code. 1. The proposed subdivision complies with the use standards of the R -12 zoning district (Code Chapter 18.54) because the lots are intended to be used for single family detached dwelling units, a permitted use in the zone. The eleven 4,100 to 7,250 square foot lots are all equal to or larger than the minimum 3,050 square foot minimum lot size requirement of the zone. All such lots should be subject to the setback standards of the R -12 zone. Compliance with these standards will be reviewed as part of the building permit application process for single - family homes on individual lots. 2. Lots 1, 2, 10 and 11 meet the basic solar access requirements as specified in Code Section 18.88.040(C)(1). The front lot line orientation of these lots is within 30 degrees of true east -west and these lots also provide a minimum north -south dimension of at least 90 feet. Lots 3 and 9 shall be counted as the 20% exemption from these solar lot requirements. Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 do not comply with either one or both of these minimum requirements. HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 9 Section 18.88.040(E)(1)(iii) allows an exemption of lots due to existing road patterns which must be continued through the site or must terminate on -site with applicable road standards in such a way that prevents given lots in the development from being oriented for solar access. The only acceptable access to this site is through an extension of SW 83rd Court and the creation of a standard cul -de -sac bulb, with a radius of 50 feet. Access cannot be connected to SW Hall Boulevard from SW 83rd Court because of ODOT access standards. Additionally, providing this connection would create an improper and hazardous intersection alignment in relation to the proximity to the intersection of Hall and Bonita. Therefore, this exemption should be applied to lots 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. This Code Section has been satisfied. 3. The proposed subdivision complies with the density standards of Chapter 18.92. The net developable area of the site (after deduction of the public right -of -way dedication) is approximately 53,900 square feet. With a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet, this site yields an opportunity for 17 dwelling units under the R -12 zoning designation. The applicant has proposed the creation of 11 lots and therefore, complies with this standard. 4. The applicant has not submitted a tree survey of the site as required by Section 18.150. Therefore, prior to the issuance of a tree removal permit, the applicant will need to submit, and receive approval for, a tree removal application form and supply details identifying the type and size of trees on this site which are greater than six inches in diameter. This survey shall identify those trees which are proposed for removal. 5. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the subdivision approval standards of Chapter 18.160 (Subdivisions) because: a. The proposed subdivision complies with the Comprehensive Plan Map's Medium Density Residential density opportunity for the site as well as with the applicable plan policies, the regulations of the R -12 zone, and other applicable regulations; b. The proposed name of the subdivision, Starlings Crossing, is not duplicative of any other plat recorded in Washington County; c. The proposed public street provides for adequate and safe access to the lots in this proposed subdivision and provides for an extension of an existing street stub. 6. This application is consistent with the criteria of Section 18.160.120 regarding a subdivision variance for an overlength cul- de -sac. A cul -de -sac is limited in length to a maximum of 400 feet as stated in Section 18.164.030(K). As proposed, the length of SW 83rd Court will be approximately 475 feet. The extension of SW 83rd Court is the only acceptable option for providing adequate access to this site because of ODOT access limitations to SW Hall Boulevard. The granting of this variance will not be HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 10 detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the rights of other owners of property. Additionally, this variance is necessary for the enjoyment of a substantial property right. If this variance were to be denied, this land would only be developable at the same density by the creation of either an undesirable private street, common access tract, or flag lots. Alternatively, lots would be lost. Although not requested by the applicant, a variance is also necessary for lots number 10 and 11 which exceed the maximum lot depth to width ratio as specified in Section 18.164.060(A)(1)(b). This section allows a maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5:1. Lot 10 exceeds this requirement by 2 feet, whereas lot 11 exceeds this requirement by 5.5 feet. To correct this by shifting lot lines to the west would require that other lots give up square footage. Again, this site is in a peculiar situation in that the placement of the road extension cannot be adjusted to bring these two lots into compliance. All eleven lots exceed the minimum lot size requirement of 3,050 square feet per lot so there would not be any detrimental effect on adjoining properties if this portion of the variance is granted. Additionally, the granting of this variance lends to preserving the proposed sizes of the lots which abut SW Hall Boulevard (lots 5, 6, and 7). This allows the greatest amount of flexibility for the individual placement of the homes which will be adjacent to an arterial. Therefore, this portion of the variance should be approved. 7. The proposed subdivision plat is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.164 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards), or can be modified to be consistent with these requirements, because: a. The applicant will be required to install half- street improvements and dedication of additional right -of -way to 60 feet from centerline along the site's frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. The improvements shall be designed and constructed to arterial standards. Southwest Bonita Road is fully improved therefore, no improvements are necessary. The applicant shall be required to provide full width street improvements to local street standards for the extension of SW 83rd Court. b. The proposed buildable lots are consistent with code standards for maximum lot depth -to -width ratio except for lots number 10 and 11 which is addressed by the above referenced variance. Minimum frontage on a public, and other applicable lot dimensional standards have been satisfied. c. The existing lines and the applicant's preliminary plans for developing sanitary and storm sewers as well as public water lines will provide for adequate necessary public facilities. B. Compliance With Comprehensive Plan Policies HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 11 1. The subdivision is consistent with Policy 2.1.1 because notice of the application and the public hearing on this item was provided to the neighborhood planning organization and to owners of property in the vicinity of the site. The proposed site has been posted with a sign noting that a development application on this site was pending. 2. In order to comply with Policy 4.2.1, a condition is warranted to require the developer to prepare an erosion control plan ensuring compliance with erosion control standards for the Tualatin River Basin as part of the grading permit application. The developer shall also construct an on -site water quality facility as required by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and USA regulations or pay a fee -in -lieu of constructing an on -site water quality facility. The City's Engineering Department advises that the site developer be required to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of an on -site facility. The site is considered unsuitable for development of an on -site facility because of its relatively small size and the unavailability of space within which to place the facility. Payment of a fee in lieu of construction of a facility is authorized by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and USA regulation is cases where it is undesirable or impractical to construct a facility. 3. This subdivision proposal complies with Policy 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend public sewer and water systems to this site and will provide for underground installation of phone, electricity, and cable television lines. 4. The subdivision proposal complies with Policy 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposed improvements to the streets within and adjacent to the subdivision should contribute to a safe and efficient street system in this area. The extension of SW 83rd Court will be required to be improved consistent with City of Tigard standards for public streets. The anticipated traffic from the eleven residences to be built in the subdivision are not expected to significantly affect total traffic levels in the area. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division concludes that the proposed subdivision, will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local state and federal laws. In recognition of the findings staff recommends APPROVAL of subdivision proposal SUB 92 -0009 and Variance VAR 92 -0017 for the proposed Starlings Crossing subdivision subject to the conditions which follow. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED OR COMPLETION SHALL BE FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUBDIVISION. Staff contact for all recommended conditions is Chris Davies of the Engineering Department, 639- 4171, unless otherwise noted. HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 12 THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY: 1. The applicant shall be required to pay the surface water quality fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first portion is paid with the public improvements for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right -of -way. The second portion is paid at the time of Building Permit issuance which for each individual lot. 2. Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval. NOTE: These plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. 3. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the, public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989. 4. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. Easements shall be provided where crossing other lots. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall e recorded with each lot accessing a private storm drain line. 5. Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 6. A grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours and typical finished floor elevations on each lot, including elevations at 4 different corners of the floor plan tied to the top of curb elevations as shown on the public improvement plans. 7. The applicant shall make an appointment for a pre - construction meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of the public improvement plans but before starting work on the site. The applicant, the applicant's engineer and contractor shall be required to attend this meeting prior to receiving the approved plans and permits. 8. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right -of -way of SW Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 9. Additional right -of -way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 13 SW Hall Boulevard frontage to increase the right -of -way to 60 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right -of -way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State, shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. NOTE: For additional information, contact Myron Melick; Oregon Department of Transportation, Right -of -Way Section, 7165 SW Fir Loop, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 684 -1510. 10. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Oregon State Highway Division by installing half- street along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard. Two (2) copies of the approved public improvement plans shall be submitted to the City Engineering Department prior to the issuance of a Public Improvement Permit from the City. 11. Lots 5, 6 and 7 shall not be permitted to access directly onto SW Hall Boulevard. Lots 8, 9, 10, and 11 shall not be permitted to access directly onto SW Bonita Road. 12. The applicant shall underground utilities along SW Hall Boulevard and SW Bonita Road which fronts this development or pay a fee in -lieu of undergrounding. 13. Construction of the proposed public improvements and issuance of Building Permits shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans, a street opening permit or construction compliance agreements has been executed, execution of a developer- engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees. 14. Prior to the plat being recorded with Washington County, the applicant shall provide a 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment. As an alternative, the applicant may have the plat recorded after the public improvements have been accepted by the City of Tigard and Oregon Department of Transportation and has posted the appropriate Maintenance Bond. 15. A tree survey identifying the type and size of all trees on the site which are over 6 inches in diameter shall be submitted. This survey shall specify those trees which are proposed for removal in coniunction with public improvements. A tree removal permit shall be applied for and approved by the Planning Division prior to the removal of any such trees on -site. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Division. THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 16. A tree survey identifying the type and size of all trees on the site which are over 6 inches in diameter shall be submitted. This survey shall specify those trees which are proposed for removal for individual building lots. A tree removal permit shall be applied for and approved by the Planning Division prior to the removal of any such trees on -site. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Division. HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 14 17. A demolition permit will be required for the removal of the existing buildings. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division. 18. The septic tank shall be pumped out and filled in or completely removed. An inspection shall be obtained after the tank is filled or removed. A copy of the receipt from the pumping company shall be provided. If the building is connected to the public sewer the line shall be properly capped -off, and inspected by the City. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division. SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID ONLY IF THE FINAL PLAT IS SUBMITTED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. /.-- ��) ( .-- (----) -- --) (--).- Prepared Ron Pomeroy/ Date Assistant Planner r - Approved By: Dick Bew o ff Date Senior P1 nner . -t 112 _ CE ' W ✓ S.W COLONY C .� 10 771 1k 1 1� d Rill ElI FANNO' '; _ _, O : 1 _111 t2111// I /I /1 � f 0 ./ r- • Ili atIllf..., 01% le on �.� owl ,Sir i iii , � ' � - 6REENSWAR 01 4 . m m SW ...,/:\ l J y u A , • . ? St" WAY Iii W K S R OE SE le '►= - i ' LOOP A a < z, In 3 � t S.W. E Z °' m °� m Q. 133121.121 ' Via .W. v$ 11 mu m /,/„„,MA .. -- s o OP ' -r.ipr... h mil a ____. . ... r . 1 m , • g - , > se - . ... , S rC MUP.00CK i, ST. s . 3 J m SW . I r t • . • L A wntiQlA CT� — ______ . W y Q I O HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING /EDWARDS PAGE 15 • c XTY DIP Building Of iciul /Brad R. City order iw- Engineering /Ohrie D. Permits Coordinator/Viola O. t PECXAL DISTl3I' S Fire District (Pick -Op box) Tigard Water District 8777 8W Bntrnhau St. Tiga. T., OR 97223 School Dist So. 48 "'"' tseaWextoa) Joy Pahl PO Soot 200 '(Beaverton, off! 47075 .1.1/School Dint. 233 6Ti3fird) 13137 SW Pacific Uwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Wator Distract --' 6501 SW Taylors Perry Rd.. Tigard, OR 97223 APPECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Ude € Tranap. 150 N. First Ave, Hillsboro, OR 97 '4/4 Brent Cis RGentn Martin Jaaann Rice - Scott Ring - Pre42 Eberle --- Mike 2O1=ea011 City of Beaverton Har dryot PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 city Of king City - city Manager 1;x300 SW 116th Ring City, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego City ttunager 360 SW A Lake Cortege), OR *7034 State Highway' Division Bob Doran PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225- 0412 • SPECK AG iCXES if General Telephone '"'— Rude Wells 7 2460 SW Main St. igard, Or '97223 NW Natural Can Scott PalineJ 220 NW Second Avo. Portland, OR 97209 TC ]� Cableirieian of Oregon Mike 0ali ck 3900 SW Bond St,, Portland, 0R 94'201 Boundary Commiadion 320 SW Stark Room 530 Portland, OR 97204 B CD (CPA °e:, only) 75 Court StC N$ lima, OR 97310 -0590 0' oth ar__ tits 1414 i e City of Durham -- ... city Manager t7160 SW Lipper Boonet� Pe y r Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 Citt]? or Portland PlanniLg Director 1120 SW 5th artlaied, OR .97n04 Lidwiea Rahmann 9002 SE Matoughlin Blvd. Mil aukie, OR 97222 Portland Cenral R.0.0. Marian Hoote .. 14685 Sl Old Scholle Pry. eavetrton, OR 97 007 Hetro Area Communications Jason Hewitt Twin oaks Technology Center 1815 gW 169th Place 6 -6020 Bea,erton, OR 97006 -4806 ttS West, Poto ;NeleOn 421 sW oak 6t. Portland, OR 97204 Columbia Cable (Frank Stone) 14200 SW Brigadoon pt. Boavarton, OR 97005 STATE AssildrLS Aarorauticaa Div. (CBOT) Engineer Board of gooith Fish &_ Wildlife Parks & ROdreatibn Siva Subdiviaion gapervisooa. - D• ept. of Enm:.'gy - D• ept„ of knviron. Quality FEDERAL ACENCIEu DOCA N Division of State Lar du COSzil vc8 Dept. H a PS k LC„DC PJC ---- Fire Fire Hardball Other OTHER Southern Padifid Transportation Company ey Duane H Forn.' PLS Project Engineer 0bo i %.I 61 Aven0a, S. 324, union statib Portland, OR 91209 t•. STATE or OREGON County of W►ashiugton ) o . city of Tigard ) ' '' .. + nt) being r teal ectorn /aff iy on oath x, <- .z� �'�✓ min firra�� depose and *lair: (Please prl apt That I aril ��.,.�,. for The City of Tigard, Oregon That 3,` sexy NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEXRING FOB X.,,.-;Aerved NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: cit ► of Tigard Planning' Director Tigard Planning Oommlieeion : `Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard city Council Exhibit C1aEl" We® mailed to - each n�►�ed ®icon} of oahi�ch i�► attached Q�`' �x�ed A (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of i�eci g r �, ,N , w _ G en/n c h® attached list marked exhibit "B on t.,;e - Gtv'''. day c f h a,cLt ®a. O �. 193 , said notice NOTICE or D CISION as ne to tta tied, was oa * on, an Rpprop,°iate bulletin srd on the day of -'r Ala of 19 4,7 and depa'ited in the United States Ma 1 on the ', .. , 4 A ,.A . postage prepaid. Pr ®pared Notice P Yy ribed � � ' ,lea, rn /af firm to � ® on the, deity of A NOTARY, PUBLIC OF OREGON: tho dottelistoiOn. Expir oa: CT a1 OP TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY HEARINGS OFFICER 1. Concerning Case Number(s): SUB 92 -0009 VAR 92 -0017 2. Name of Oiwner: Dr. Carlos Starlin Name of Applicant: Same 3. Address 2 Boone® Ferl Rd. City flake ftlita ao State OR, Zip 97035 4. Address of Property; 14600 SW Hall Blvd. Tax Map and Lot No(s) : ,2S1 1.2BCy; „tax lot 1600 5. Request: A request for approval of ; the following development applications: 1) Subdivision approval to o wide a parcel consisting of approximately 1.55 acres into 11 dote between approximately 4,050 and 7,250 square feet, 2) Variance approval to allow development of a cul-de-sac local s `.reet to exceed 400 feet whereas Code section 18.164.03) (K) allows a maximum cul-de -sac length of 400 feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA= Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.134, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164. Zone: R--12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) The R -12 tone allows single family attached/detached residential unite,, multiple - faintly residential units, residential care facilitiecy mobile home parks and subdivisions, public support services, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other Uses. 6. Action.` Approval as requested X Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notice3 Notice was published in the newspaper, wonted at r_ty Hall, and mailed to: The applicant PP of cant and owner(s) Owners record within the required distance The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization Affected governanentaY agencies 8. Final Decisions THE DECISION :*i2 LL BE FINAL ON 9eptetni,er UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, aAdl statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Departtent, Tigard City Hall, 13125 80 Hali, P.O. Box 23391, migard, Oregon 97223. a �coxdance y p. y () Y P decision in n ma' a al t Section 18,36j70 2 'with 18 3a . 290 B sand his . e which provide® that veal � ar ®t o "ec�� . raw ® o a written appeal may be filed within i0 days after poticzi is giver and Bent. the appeal may be submitted on City foams and minet be accompanied by the appeal fee ($315.O0) and transcript costs to a maximum of $500.00) . T g.. appeal .. The deadline for filing Of are a al is 3a30 p.bia 4: p .. any questions, .. j y f .g . Planning De` artment, 639- 4171: 10. ga�estione. If you have �n estior�e, plt��s�# e,�a�.l. the City o.. and k km /SuB92 -09. BXJ a• BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARING ► OFFICER OR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Roger Ed for approval of R a preliminary plat for an 11 -1ot subdivision for land east of SW Hall Boulevard south of SW Bonita Road in the R -12 zone La the City nf'Tigard, Oregon ) ) FINAL ORDER SUB 92,,909 (Starlings Crossing) I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a preliminary plat to divide about 1.55 a ores into 11 lots in the (Residential, per , ariaat , to the maximum permitted length of a cul de� c a variance to the maximum � permitted lot depth to width ratio for two proposed lots, and an adjustment to solar access standards for new development.. Proposed lots comply with thedMensional and density requirements of the zone, except for the lot depth to width ratio of two proposed lots. About 73% of the proposed lots comply with the sctar access standards for new development. The site abuts SW Mall Boulevard and Bonita Road, but no direct i� streets proposed, The applicant proposes to dedicate � g h o f way for and to improve the Hall Boulevard frontage as directed by the State of Oregon Highway Division and to dedicate right of way for and to improve to City standards an extension of SW 83rd Court from the east edge of the site to a cal de sac on the site.. All lots will have direct vehicular access exclusively to SE 83rd Court on the site Public sanitary and storm sewers and water lines will serve each lot. On-site storms water quality features are not proposed. A public hearing regarding the application was held on August 31,1992: City staff recommended conditional approval of the sitbdivision. The applicant accepted the staffs recommended conditions of approval. After discussion, the applicant agreed to modify the lat so that all pro sed lots cool with the lot depth to width st mdard. No preliminary P �' Po comply A one else testified about the development. LOCATION: East 1f . J .. g QC,P�T'Td�I�. East of �� adjoining S!� I Hall Boulevard south of and adjoining SW Bonita Road, WCTM 251 .2BC, lax lot 1600 COie P E HENS E PLAN: Medium Density Residential ZONING R -12 (Residential, 12 2 units/gross, acme).:. APPLICANT: Roger Edwards, iepn staked by Alpha Engineering OWNER: Dr. Carlos Starling SHE AREA About 135 acres APPLICABLE LAW; Community Nvelopment Code Cho 18.54, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18.150, 18.160, and 18-164, Re alutioii and Order 91-47; Coo p rehensive Plan Policies es 2.1.1,42.1,7.1.2,7,3.1,7.4.4,8.1.1, and 8..- STAFF RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEDIDATIONt Conditionally approve in part and �� att part den HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION: Conditionally approved part ved in anal denied in part Page 1 - Hearings f) icer decision Shcl 92 -0009 croa'sirng) FINDINGS ABOUT srrE AND SURROUNDINGS g • • . by site . surroundings The Hearings Officer incorporates b reference the findings about else. site end in Section II of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated Ac gust 31, 1992, 111. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the approval standards in Section III of the City of Tigard. Staff Report dated Au ast 31, 1992: IV.. HEARING, TESTIMONY, AND NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS A. Hearing: Hearings Officer Larry Epstein reeeive3 testimony at the public hearing about this application on August 31, 199/ A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony): These exhibits axe Tiled at the Tigard City Hall. Summary of oral testimony. $, i ed the staff report and 1. City Planner Jerry Offer testified for the City. in He summarized recommendation. : mm nded one change in the ro o ,ed conditions of approval. considering the dimensions of the lots and tie applicable criteria, he p . variance . to stile lot depth to width withdrew the recommendation fora approval of the ratio and urged the Hearings Officer to deny that variance. Z. Randy Clano testified for the applicant. He accepted the conditions recommended by City staff with the change proposed by Mr. Offer. After discussion with his client, withdrew the z --nest for the lot depth to width Mr. Offer, and. the Hearings Officer, he t � with F variance and agreed to modify the preliminary plat to comply with that standard. C. NPO and Agency Comments. The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the NPO and agency comments in Section IV of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated August 31, 1992. ♦ . EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. Compliance with Community Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. . s incorporates ye_ , findings about compliance with the g y Plan Section V of the City of The Hearings Officer ineo of�ates b x1r��re�k�.c the 1992�exce x .m Tigard Staff Report dated August 31, p on�rnut�ty Development Code and � � A Pt the finding regarding the proposed valiance to CDC section 18 ,16 .060( 1 maximum lot tenth to width ratio), Instead the Hearings Instead, th Clfficer finds that, although �sitar the 1 ®t depth '� width ratio .. that .. • , , in �CD'� Section ti 2 -1/ variance may have certain benefits, lots 10 and stand d 11 can each .ne�'1 about feet so that they comply with the lot depth to A t 8. b) without reducing the number of lots in the subdivision: g M 64 0��(A)O l)( ,,,r, .far the proper design or function of the subdivision Pnd is not necessary for &th preservan a�� a sustantial prop right, and variance to this standard is not nec+e +~ : modified 16 120. A condition ;is such a vat�ari�. comply accordingly, ....� does not card 1 with CDC section 1 �1 . y warranted requiring the preliminary plat to be o in y. Page 2 , p'wrings Officer j"wer decision SUB i)2-009 (Starli figs Grossing) Co Pri a with Resolution and Order 9147: The applicant can comply with Resolution and Order 91-47 by paying a fee in lieu of building an on -site storm water quality facility. `V[. STTE VISIT BY HE 1NGS OFFICER The Hearings officer visited the site and suounding area. VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION The Hearings Officer concludes that the proposed preliminary plat, solar access adjustment, and'cul de sac length variance • �' -- . � � comply with �e applicable �riter� and standards' �,,I` the Community Develo ment Code, provided development that occurs after this decision ... oty p complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to erns= such compliance occurs. In recogti tioA of the findings and, conclusions contained herein; and inc orating theiStaff Report and other reports of affected agencies and public testirnonax and exhibits received in this matter, the Hearings Officer hereby denies a variance to the IA :WMmtm lot depth to approves (Starlings C�rossing) t • cud ratio and a taazdardl and fan -adjustment t� a so solar access st , dce to for new axainnu r" tiEt, .. 4 standard, i w /, the development, length to the conditios of approval recommended !cn th/August 31, 1992 Staf Report, with the following amendments: 1. The first sentence of Condition 9 is hereby amended to read as follows: 9 Additional right of way shall Ile conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the SW Hall Boulevard frontage to Mere= the right of way to a maximum m of ... centerline, " s determined by the feet front ceantwith the width of dedication to be Highway sion,- 2. A new condition 19 is hereby unposed to read as follows: 19. so that an�lot exceeds a the tt�i to width � do of 2a�tk '� c' preliminary plat ply plat, applicant shall and t¢? adjust lot lines as necessary to at con depth this purpose, provided ab lots ' continue to comply with applicable dimensional requirements of the It>1° zones . . Larry Ep$tein Page3 Hearings 0 seen decision SUB 92 -0009 (Starlings Ceessikg) }� . r.. .'.►. I.. y'of` $ ber,199 p.� ip RAND' GL ARNO ALPHA ENGINEERING 9600 SW OAK SUITE 230 TIGARD OR 97223 DR. C RLOS STAMING c/o ROGER EDWARDE 4500 SW KRUSE WAY ONE t180, LAKE OSWEGO 'OR 97035 DR. C RLOS STARLING 15962 SW BOOMS FERRY RD LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 CRAIG HOPKINS 7430 SW YARNS ST TIGARD OR 97223 / Ydaknx veWntioas;,,�jMq f4lrkVr hQi1;MLlY?fWW R Y:'. �SFrAM,iM3yFerM4r4M.1aK1dH.U4C0 i-it VlSaRi'MiNMr+M1rrM+kr�V�.r4VH1„ i newwancdMk�r'�ii,S. �iwtwu.f+ur.,+' awfwxuM :Mr +kwvyvrwA.,w.r•J�dh`�" 4 !' rJ• ..,{WN,N;p+ra,4�'1NfrrF.- �..lfkf e,4.T4�uy�.iwHF`n"�:+ M« lKa:«fiwu:uH«Nat'•,n ;aW;7ra.� {wi fl:lihkrti:.{pF�P14= r.'iWAC Mi',f; Pry- 4f1.'fa Jf+y Co datrImenta1 to the public health, a : •3t ' &n , Welfaxe or Injurious to the rights of other ownnere of property. A4ditionally, this variance is necessary tut' the enjoyment of a' substantial Property right. If th?e variance were to be den.ed, thin land would only be developable at the same density by the 'creation of either an undesirable . private street, can access tract, or flag iota. Alternatively, lots would be peat. Al ugh nOt requeatcl by the applican11, a variance is also necesaa or. lots nuMbttr 10 and 11 wilt ;�b exceed the maximum lot depth to widthlratioecified in y S(ction /8.164. 05a m ill (b , . 4) This section allows a ma �, Ah to is ah ratio of 2.5:1. Lot 10 exceeds this recatiiremenit ,/eet,F whereas lot, 11 exceeds this requirement b Tp • et. o Correct this by shifting lot -� h- eat wOu require that other lots give up equate Again, this alto in In a peculiar fe+r+tage. situation in that the placement of the road extension cannot be ash juste to ,. bring these two ts into �i 3 eleven lots exceed the minim= ]. e alms i� i� mentof 05® square feet lot so t � ere would no t be any detrimental effect on adjoining properties If this portion of the varianCe is granted. of the lots this c�. �dditia►naail�r , the ri.�ntin o variance lends to preserving the proposed cases o which abut SW Hall Boulevard ( s T allows the greatest amount of fl ®ibiit for the individual p lacement of the homes which will be adjacent to an arter al. Therefore, thin portion of the variance should .be approved. • The proposed subdivision plat is consistent with the requirements y p {} t Stand rds 1\ , or can be modified to be conna��,atent w iit zm arove.+aa�6 „_ T asfn o€ Chapter 15.164 -� Street a.nd Ut with thee© re �:r�e'a�nt� s �acas~• Q. The applicant Will be required to install half - street improvements and dl •., ','nation of aaditionshl right-,of-ways to 60 feet from centerline along the eite'a frontage on sW Hall Boulevard. The i mrroVements shall be designed and constr tad to arterial etandarda. Southwest Bonito Road is, fully improved therefore, no improvements are e ass . Tne applicant shall be required to provide full. , width jbt.reet improVementO to local street standards foil the extension of SW 83rd Court. • The proposed lots are o' nt �4 d s standards for naacianna lot d pth t ®r id t i® ratio kept fa re lots nuer 10 ' ars 11 whi CV ah n is addreeaad b y t hi referenced variance. 4in iYm l fronta g e on a pibi , other aa., itaak ie lot digienSionai standards have bo en satisfied. The existing limes and the appiiCant d n preliminary Plana ' for developing sanitary and storm eewere as Weil as Publi d water linos will provide for ad9 uata' n5aes5ary , pulbil .c facilities liana , _ ,C mn r gat10 Plani Policies HEARINGs oppICBR SUB 92 -t1009 ST ui r'• The subdivision is coneiss►ta nt with Policy 2.1.1 b®coilea notice of the application, and the public hoparinc on this item was provided to the neighborhood planning o3 gaAissctt ion and to owners of property in the va►icinitv of the site. The proposed site has been posted with a ®er,gn noting that a development applicatiore on this site was pending. 2. in order to comply with Policy 4.2.1, a condition is warranted to require the develeper to prepare an erosion control plan ensuring compliance watt► erosion control standards for the Tualatin River Basin as part of the grading permit aapplivastion. The developer shall also construct , an on-site water quality facility as required by the Oregon Envvironm ental Qual tte, Commiesion and 11323 regulations or pay a fee- in -iiee of constructing an ore -site water quality facility. The City's Engineering Department advises that the site developer be required to pay a fee In lieu of the construction of on-eiti facility. The site f considered unsuitable for development of are tan -'site favi! i.ty because of its relatively Email size and the un !vell ebi].ity f ®pace within which to place the facility. arnaent of a fee in liner of construction of a fa ility is a nths ';rized by the Oregon Buviroiunan'dtal, giaality Coreeitieelion Co aria USA re eulatic ' is cases where it is undesirable or a mrprr,ctical to .eon $tru .t a facility IA 3, This ®sabdivissio~rn p,roponal c a apl tes with policy 7.1:, 2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 .e;. %; use the applicant Will extend public Eiciitie2C meet water systems I 'A this site and wild', provide for underground installation of pnuone, electricity, and cable television lines. 4. The subd;I.vision ar oosal complies wi,th Policy 8.1.3. and 8. ], . 3 because the proposed improvements te:il the streets within and adjacent to the ssubdi visai.on Should contribute to a safe anti efficient street, system in this area. Tare extension of SW 83rd Court will be regutsred ,''ate nt with ,City of Tigard satay�.�idar�',ls for publi .ems ems. rovm anticipated traffic :.scm hs:3 eleven roleic1ences to be built A,n the subdt vision are not atpected to signs icantiy affect total traffic levels in the area,. VI. CONCLUSION AND R ,uoC®MNATION The Planning Divieio n ceetcludee that the proposed sneedi viaiond wi 11 prorasote the general welfare of the City and will be significantly antly detrime ►tal nor i juri use to sur .oran;idiny propee..tiea: provided °ca t development which eicourse after this decision complies with h pl a �1iscabl:e loreal state and fsedsarsal. lade. ;?"a3 recognition of the findings staff recoinetendie APPPOnit, of nubc`dv .eion proposal SUB 92- 0009 and Variance YAM 92 -6017 fns: tine propoged Starlingr Crossing subdivision sub je.'rdt to the conditions Watch follow. UNLE$S OTHERWISE NOTED, ALI. CONDITIONS skihrL Itzrownw ougrixt efn sittN ti SEIPZie BE COMPLETED OE C 'Al &ST/ON SHALL me FIVANcUlaar As8URBD pazot, TO TO ISSI CE Cat An PEPAITS Rea. COtaa' aticti IOC Ol' mg 8v8 trnsz !!. tai' es�t tact for al e, null. ... , g� ins Dear' menu► 639 r�;.µ,.esndedY eQisidit�i�cane ie rl.sse pay esa cf the Engineering 71, unless otherwise noted+ HEARINCA )I CE -- SUB 92-00n9 Y“; "M.,: W 1A i_ � _.. �4 Y ,p THE APPLICANT SHOD L ' REQUIRED TO CORM WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PaI 'n TO RECORDING OP ' .INAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY: The Applicant shall be required to pay the surface water quAlity fees' as established under the ` guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agenoy Resolution and Order No. 91-4/. NOT. This is a two p' . fee which is paid at different times. . i t b_t n is p� d with the public tmp oreaex to for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. The second portion is p at th Building ' suince which for mach fn�diwidual paid �.: ►.xa� t3�ii� of Bu ;ia,d$n Pex�ndi.t � i� lot. Two (2) setts of detailed public improvismme it plans and profile constructiot1 drawings mall be s ►bthittOd for preliminary review to the Engineering Department.. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction ction co,aat estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall ba submitted ted for final review r approval. Nom; These plans aria in 0..rtit, can to any drawings ;gs required by the Building 'D thiob and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. An erosion control: plan sh =11 he " provided as part of the 'public improvement drawin95. The p,'wr n shall conform t ^ "Orosio i trol Plans Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989. The applio tnt shall deuon* ttate that storm drainage _runoff can be discharged' into the existing; drainageways without aignifica unt1y impacting properties downstream, Easements ttse shall , bee Provided where :crossing other lots,. A joint use and mai nt {lrlaanca a gre6 m t shall e recorded with each lot accessing a private ittPZM drain ? tnei storm drain ,: ge di,Jtaila shall be proV ivied as part of th publid improvement ;lama. Calculations and a topographid Map of th6 storm drainage basin eaa,rvice area obeli be Provided 46 a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be bay® 4 A.00 full development of the servic - able area The location anA capadity cf .axLt ing, proposed, and future lines shall be addreesandi 6. A 9z ?adinq ;lama shag ;, he Subatcaitted rho' ini:4 the ;"xi.ating dad VroPoded oo> tours and typical fi.•n ,shod floor letri io a c oath lot, ..nc 2.i4ding elevations at 4 d .fferrat corners of title floorllan tied to the top of curt b elevati :na ae ohow�n cn the public 1400roveMent p1,a anal. 7 e The applicant Shall make sppOinttent fora Prito,deilitrueliort pre ilitettit4 with the Oity of Tigard gngin erih0 Degas anent after t :ypro ial ct the Public is improvement plane but before aetertieg wok on the a t4. the applicant, the applicant y e engineer and Conti °aetOr ahaeli be teriOirrd to attend thin meeting prior 'wo ronoivi nq the approved 0164ili midi perittt'n S. The applicant obeli' c! teirr� a potti,� i rem the Starts of Ore0on Highwa�ty Diviitiora, to ,. _. pe. forte wra:�r� wiythixa the ��Gg %nt- �o��wa� Of D� �ia11 �onlev4d4 to went riot° oiieeuance of public a n ., rove ant permit, i s a s ii g p p 9 Additional right f -way ehaaill be ocitionted to the c tate eo,►L )kegozn, % y and r, through its Dept ant of Ti^a heportatinn# Highway toltil►ioirll, .LAlci g t' WahtiINGs O?F CER - SUB 92 -0009 STARTANd/gowhitot • IN y • F at U �` �► of tr SW Hall Bo lad r+�''frontage to increase the right-of-way tom® feet from centeeline. The description shall be tied t, the eni ®Zing right -of -way centerline:. Ver sf ieation that the cotveyance, has been, submitted to the State, shall pmt prc' iGe d to the Cit ,' Engineering Department. BCTE « For additional Wort etion, contact )iy on Melicka Oregon Department of Transpo�;tation, Hight-of-Way S *action, 7165 Loop, Tigard, Oregon - _ 7165 SW Fir doe, , �'i, as.d ®rec 97223, 684 -1510. 10. T7,flo applicant shall : mply. with the ree ttire ante► of the, Oregrro Stat: Highway Division by installing half - Street along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard. Two (2 ) copies of the approved public ifproveaaent, plane hall be se witted to the City Engineering DepartMent prior to the issuance of a Public Improvement permit from the City', 11. Lots 5, 6 and 7 shall not be permitted to acceeS directly onto SW Hall Bo:alevard. Lots 8, 9, 10• and 11 shall not bar permitted to airless directly onto: SW Bonita Read, 12 ie 'the •" pplic,a nt shall underground utilities along SW Hall Boulevard azad W Bonita Road which fronts thi,a develolent err pay a fee in -lieu of under grounding. 13 « oonat w'ction of the proposed public a.mprovements and issuancO 0 Building Permits shall not commence until after the Wn din =exing De pan . °Aent has reviewed and approved the public iapro eMents plane, a street opening permit or construction oompliance agreettielitil has been eXecuted, execution Of a developer, - engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees o 14. Prior t,o the plat being recorded with Washington county. the applicant t5h ll provide a 100 porcent parfor: anoe assurance or letter of cottilMitAeitti, As 'n alternative, the applicant may bat* the plat recorded after the pub,,.,j iunp en 0tet have been accepted by the Oity of Tigard and Oregon Departaiicent of Transportation wad has posted the appropriate MaintelliatiOd Bend. 15. A tre M autvey survey identifying the type a. nd site of *ll trees On t`;ke ` site which are carer 6 Inches in diameter shell DO sub ' L *ed. thin rottvey shall Cip®t.a y those trees which 6=2 proposed far rEmovai i rn. t tuxnct . taut i:i.sz *i ro sa e A tree re noval j er0.it eh�alA be applied for and ha�. _ - - Division r i,or to the - by ,.,�.�, Planning p „ � th® removal of a ,�y a#uc�a tre s on elite. STAFF OO T s victor l •onri# planning D E: over THE itiPPLICANT $UOV LD BE tirQUIAED TO coiett WITH THE FO HUNG doNtOXTIMIS FRIG TO TIIE IS;BYJA dE ' ' ritILDICHO PERMITS: 16. ?r tree , m vey id®ntifyin g the type and :MAO of all treed olt he Site Which Mt , over 5 inched in di titer ®hail eubutitteet. vitae Survey •hall Specify those tr . it Which are atopcesed for re oval tor` indtttilual . W.„Itilktvi.,9kkie, tree tetiovel potelit Shall be appl. i d fot an d tpapn p r�soitr by, the P1anniu g p rior to the bet oVal Of any each titAeit STAFF e O TACT: Vioter Adonr d Pl aun ... g I ri:i i n SINGS OFFICER SUB 92 --0009 ST ING /EDWARDS � a4 e PAGE i:4 • 17. A demolition permit will be required for the removal of the existing buildings. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building 18. The septic tank shall be punted out and filled in or c4.4 mpletely removed. An inspection shall. be tank is f I',.11ed or removed A copy of the receipt from the obtained after ing company shall be provided. If the. building is connected to the public sewer the line shall be properly capped -off, and inspected by the City. STAFF CONTACT: Brad R& aet, Building uivi =:ion. V F TS'' FINAL PLAT IS ; SUBMITTED WITHIN SUBDIVISION APPR(?1AP►.t, SHALL a� �A�,II"e ONLY T EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE AF THIS DECISION. Preps recd By Ron Pomeroy Date Assistant Plan et Date 112 cc1.oe$Y �.i iiiimmcic P a HEARINGS FFICZR 9' � -0009 - S dARTINC/E,.....DWARDS • 61 0 w BEFORE % HE LTD USE , Ia GS OFFICER FO THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an applicatton by Dr. Carlos Starling for for a modbdivision consisting nsis ine of approximately 1 «55 acres located at the southeast corner of SW Hall Boulevard and 811 Bonita Brad. I. SUMHARY OP THE RE 'Jf`satiT Ove, AGGNO1lss ITEM ,.. STAFF REPORT T st a 92-M09 CASE* Subdivision spa 92 .'0009 Sb; ":1: The applicant requests approval oft 1) subdivision preliminary plat approval parcel to 11 buildable lots k ranging in size between 4,950 and 7,250 ecure feet p 2) Variance approval to allow deva3op eat of A cul-de-sac local street to exceed 400 feet whereas the code allows a maximum ximum cul -dre -sac length ga.. depth to width 1 ®r� fn of 400 feet; 3) V'arf,a�a+�� approval to lot �!e ttn ratio for two lots. APPlG1CANT a Roger Rdlrtaardsp OW!ER: Dr. Carlos Starling 4500 SW Kraina Way One, #180 15962 ncia ita�; Ferry Rd. Lake Cowe o OR 97035 Lake �►swea�c9 OR 97035 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN YDESIGWATX0t. Medium Density Residenti,aal. ZONING DR81;IGP TI0Wt Rm12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) LOCATIONa Southwest aoz n ar of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Bonita Road. ('ACT 281 1280, tax lot 1600) 1 Pl�I CABLE LAW: eng it y , Develo nt ode chapters 18.54., 8.88.040(C)(1)afdtB), 18.'02O, 18.150.020(E 18.150.03O(A4, 18.160.060, 18.1(60.120, .1, 1.1.2, 7.3.1u 0. A m0.120 18. is�i4, rrt�Y��.aeasiv0 Plan Poli.ofeia 2.1 � 1, 4. � 7.4.4, 8.1.. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval ,: abject to co -iditiOnP. 3I FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AN $URROU 4DIUG8 Tho eublaot casVcontains 1.55 4. yr ee.. . The late ta generally square r e ii chaff Ilith approx imately 240 feet of frontage on SW 3iCt$a Road EI d 60proximately 229 feet on SW all Boulevard. 3. Mite locations Thito site in locate one the oittheaet corner ►f SW Hall Soueevaeitd air SW Bonita INo8 OFFIaR 608 92-0009 sTABLis /BLIWAEDs •f 6 lxieting_ mo ancc cture: The subject paa rcel is largely undeveloped. A single family res tdenC e and outbuilding are located on the southern porttoa of tb property, legetaition consists of indigenous grasses, aresblential, yaaam aside taw trees located south and eastern portion of the eittre. ?. P %e, icanatinnw end zorni>s The site and properties located to the north are zoned R -12 (Residential, 12 unite per acre) and dean!'.gnatsd as r diuJ — deaaaaity residential on the Comprehensive Plan :sap. Properties to the south acs.`' west are zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre) and are designated low - density residential on the Co; pr°e !.asive Plan map To the east are properti { Br .. r IIX. A2fLICABLE APPROVNL STANDAnDs . �uYnl1��„r.. e+�r+elo';t�ment Cod%. e% chaVter 18.54.8 50 004tatita 'etas>n; .tard for trip R -12 tomes ing1e. y detached rek ide tia1 unit &S. 1 perm 'tits' t® must etonE$ lath A di neneiona : ; ,r irev me *, �` Dletached a ltd Email reaid®ntial l 1KinimUm let ei 'Ont setback (rage setback later;`; sideyard setback corner sideyd setback Rear setback Maximum building height 3, 050 squat °e feet 15 feet 20 feet, 5 feet 10 feet 15 teet 35 feet �. Chapter 18.88.404(0 � ccrtar� solar access ats��ar t for n aw reeident,tal development. A lot meets the bad tc 001,er 'r, cress lot standard if it _ has : a north-eaoltIth dimension of 90 Zest cr ire and has a f'tnnt lot lino that LPs, Oriented ted within 30 degrees of a true east-west axis. A subdivision oompliee tlis; basic requirement if 80% or more of the newly created Lots meet or exceed thie standard. Chapter /8.92.020 contains standards for decnc ity. The number ' of dwelling units permitted in balled on the net development a bap e cludirrig eeneitive land areas and land dedicated foir Publlo roads. or Parke, or for private roadways. ` Willis land IL "9a is then div& ed by tb,iti minimum Parcel Size permitted by tl'te gOning district to t which Amy a ,r, _ ted on a /tea a�ete.Y�mia�e they number of �� , b o .� ®ar ry a e ch F. r 1815e102 0(E) arettuires a perra3:t an4 i;ontaitt® atatiidardst hoar rem Oval of trees hava n9, s trunk 6 ia,chea or ' more in dliameter four feet above the ... .. ground . �. ti�ii� the �d�l ®�Lt�•a�. Y lasnd. A permit r ee removal non ®t o llyYiitt t e following or t terra all specified in ,Chapter 15.150.0304A4s ' a • The trees are diseased present a lent a danger to ProPertY, or r > . 2 , sty; ' �,tir��rfere with util�.t ®e�oe o� traff'�Cs� eat '• Ehe trees~ have to be reed to touttt a +i ai nod i.mprave amts or to ctherr:wiee utilize the act ° is yroperty in a roasOnable manner, The twee are not needed to prevent o i n iletnbili ty f , or dr'a /matt pr ill g • The tree+ are not needed to protect nearby t r ±e i �a Windbreaks or all' a deeireable balanc3 betiHrrr�e shade t l aim ~spies • The apathetic ohare ter Lid the area will , e Sri eaaaa at vera rel i dtfeoted by thtt ttee rdmovt# rind « ' tighttIos 011''Plck R - 3ub 02 °0609 - aT i Na /thou' s %i, f. New vegetation planted h f the applicant. if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. • chapter 114160.060(h) contains standards for ' eubdi 3,,,sion of parcels into 4 or more lots. To be approved, a prelimin L' - plat oust comply with the following criteria: ss. The pre seal must comply, With the city 's com;Oreheneive. Flan and the aP ilicable zoning ordinance and ether applicable ordinances and regulations; proposed r o pl t. not be duplicative and m st � The l«�t name must otherwise satisfy the provriaa oll6 of ORS ChaptiL,r 92; • The Streets and roads must be laid oUt 80 as to co,nfOvm to the plate of subdivisions and maps of Partitions or subdivisions a3i eadY approved for gdjoining pro arty a i to widltt, general direction aid in all other r 'opeete unlena the City determines it is in the public inteaat to wodify the street or road Pattern; and An explanation has been provided for all common Ln pr vements» pp • Chapter 18.160.120 contains standards for the as rcaval subdivision variance. There criteria are a. There are sp cial circdMstances or conditions affecting eotieg tha property 1,rhich are unusual and Pecoli.ar to the land As compared to other lands similarly situated; • The v►orianco iaa n-ceaaary for the, proper design oz function of the subdivisions The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the ptablic health, safety, and welfare or Ln)uriot*a to the rights of oter ownersai of Property; and The variance is necessary for the ?reservation and enjoyment of a substantial prI5Pe ty right because of an extraordina r r hardabip w t c x would reault from etrict Compliance with the ✓- lat . Y's of this titled. 96 Chapter 16.164 contains standards for ; streets and util it l yea, �a o Section » 164 030 $h) reguiiree streets within and 'ad j a ningt a development to be dedicated ' clad is proved '`bed d on the claasaifi cation of the 24 E4 t» section 18,164.030‘11t reagsxiree 4 ideal Street to wavy a� ahintmum 60 ,...ifotit right- of+«way amd 34-4fo tt paved eection bett'o'r curbs and aidewalkWd V. 81 11006 of !IC!"Jt SUS fag -000 'a" INdiEDWARD a PA it d 4 • • Sectkon 11.164.040 prohilaits b jdepth from being tabre than 2t titre.* 'anhoi it width and requires at least 25 , feet of g t *n a 'llitrirtat Other than an al ey. s SORtiOn 18.169.070 resguti :4ess; a aide 4ialke adjoining' a :ea identiel atrenits. • +Section 18.10 1.090 regaairees sanitary seweir sew service. • Mitotic :at 18.164.1190 requires adegtuite provisions for. atiytca wata for Storm drainage suna�tf find dcirdi>�adtis;►m �f eas�sa��,e =•.�e � '9 f ci1iti*i. L;rev acpoligglayalla�i + tea. PoJ,Lc~/ 2.1.1 rovidess the City will assure tat citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning g aeAnd development review prop ee m. • Polfay 4.2.11 prov:W , that ? t deVelopinent within ate Tigard urban planning area shell cauple with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. • Policy 7.1. 2 provides the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and utilities placed underground. • Policy 7_. . 3. l provident the City will c o. oird3s ate water services with water districts. • 1001t, cy 744.4 re+ uiresn t.l.l new development to be connected ton an a pprop. sd aiasitary lever opstostigi. • PoW:: c 8,1.3. provides the City Will p, . ale an efficient Street and roadway sysite a that teeta current need i and anti :it ated ktittiti at 4growtlh and develop nt m ` Poli 8.1A3 t e Cy will re ire as 4 p =cdoedit an of eapprovi : that • OeVeioposet Abitt a ded ;data t trc et or halts 'other adequate h., 3tr+et ri` ht Of .. w4. edhanll b . aumom►ta�ndardl in width; des�,�:catc ��ht�rsi �.�e etaceii��k �.a, The d essvbiopeam rhe' :a c'A +it to 42044,tru' tion of the b ete r chrb!a' b aidoWaXkL to City s tanndart8 w`Lthiri the devealopment . • the developer shelf. partioiPata ie the s ` e n aofi *itet n.: atr to (t!tt s, +and e i � . r �s�ewei)ess to t eo0� davri0p nt ° s tatpadts, nt i ;_W 9.. Street improvements shall be made and a signs or signals shall be provided when the doveloPment LB tort. to create or intensify a traffic hazard. IV. NPO & A G3NL`''VC.O2 MENTS the City of Ti g ard Engineering Department has reviewed the p opoeal and offers the following comments: streets: The site ie located. on the southeast corner of SW Mill Boulevard and Sti Bonita Road. Southwest Ball Boulevard LB under the ' diotion or the Oregon Department of Transportation, (OD "W . The applicant has eh oar ry plat dedication Of right- mfr -way to 60 feet with had fp; the s«:eliiamina� lat ctaciiy street improvements. The State (ODOT4 • has recommended that the applicant be required to provide half-street mprovement + and dedication of tight f•-t ay to GO feat fries centerline along the frontage of SW Naa.l Boulevard. The Engineering ne artmont S roes with thdzae recommendations � nd, as shown s3 � p g on the preliminary piar s, the applica ,t is proposing comply with these requirements. Southwest Bonita Road is claseifitd As a major collector and 1e fully is roved along the frontage of, thy:, ar tte4 Therefore, no additional requirements are necessary. The a ; ?,ioant is ropos �.ng to extend SW 83rd .. to servo the . ii . ivied as tolt cal street. The applidant is d�velle��nent. Sou�tkl`�ae: -��„ ��1 Court vide full ��tregt �pro�re:ettarr ,fog the extension of SW 83rd Court within this developMent. AddLtianal ly , t he n�r iaan. has r� qu9ete d a variance to the length Of the 83rd Court Cul-de-sac. s cmiu *ity Development Code Sacti n 18.154:030 (K) 1llowa a maximum cal de eaa length 400 fit. ''ho e lilca at e , . r4 oe3.n, ar'"a length h of a " roai at�eaiy •465 feet. Baited oii the e�cistin road patterns 83rd pp � � 4 9 p erno and :,:;�ta�ttl.on this sit ®�,� thi.e e�teneienat of S'e�i court La a logical ektenbion of an 9 iatin toad which allows folrr j . _. pment of the site. it: he buitr ble altornai ivo a bcesBrie 3 apt fs�z�:� tho Va, r ante ehoeld be as dowse Point this paroel 6 Therefore. approved. B. Bar au to ry to rer a . There g ubiio eaa ittry met.mit 1 int§ lloaM ed within 6d 83rd �t xiTho applll ant ie prrc Bing to oonneot to *Mkt Ostend this eaititP `y eemm lf,ne to eSrve this deNteloPtvaate This seaUsi.takir se r tl io Yaa �1 efficient capae'.ity' to serve this deVelOp ant O aterm.bt4kaggo Than appile ant IS not prop osieg tan B end atelt 'Partition Of the 4gitiAttisO pubtid stom a ew ®x 1od hed n SW Hatt tioaattiVatd tog Sit Btoli. HmARIgG B 0plIcER SOB 92 -0000 - 'J ARLINdiabWARDS P y • a • • Based on the information preeer ted In the applicant, it appeare that the existing system wan designed to account date this development. The applicant should be requi i'cd to submit evidence that the existing system does in fact have adequate capacity and was designed to accommodate this development. The Unified. Sewerage Agency hue s ntaabliehed and the City has agree b t�a enforco (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Meter Management Regrulatione requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. Construction of an on -site water quality treatment facility is not appropriate because the site is small in - comp&rinon to the +iev' lopment plan. Additionally, the loss of area for the 6,n -site facility would preclude the effective development of this site. The requiring of surface water quality facilities on small sites would result in numerous+ facilities that. kuld become a maintenance, burden to the City. FUrthermore, the applicant has p any '' s and t: ere' are no natueal depressions not r® aced am sutih facilf.4uita or other areas of this site that are particularly sa it&ile for such a facility. Regional facilities, funded by fees in -lieu of construction Cdf these facilities, would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and less maintenance. Therefore, the applicant should be required to pay the fee inel.ieu Of constructing an on -site facility. ;`the City of Tigard Suildi.e Tivieien has noted that a demolition perhilt will be required for the removal elf the existing buildings., The septic tank shall be pumped out and filled in or dempletely removed» Pin inspection shall be obtained after: the tank is filled or removed. A copy of the receipt from the pumping company eh. 11 be provided. If the build buildit4 is connected to the public vetoer the line shall be properly capped-off, and inspected by the City. Private ®tram drains shal .. 1. be provia�ed a.® rlicat ©d on the plaaas far lots 1 t1hci,ettte , Easement® shall be providi d where crossing' ether lots. The mini um veipe size of a private rain ftein shall be 0 inchea> when serving 3 -6 housed. A join:: vccedca and maintenance agreement shall be recorded with each lot accessing a private dterek drain as fet13.owat Leyt ow 4 Obeli have a n equal right to use and an Obligation to operate and Maliatiliti the p : +ivate drainage facilities Within the priVete or public d eirnege easements as shoean. Tigard Water District does not t►b jett to the wire scion of a c l ele-.eae street which -seeds 400 feet L t length. &Weyer, the Water District requ est that the developer pros i de for a )1) acct waterline eaesteat to sW Ball Boulevard to be located between to e 5 Auld 6. Thy► biatititA also requests that the developer extend the prtnpoeed 6pNiaach wetter/Lae/0.064 the " seer; `eat maid connect to the existing 112 -inch untite main ot ' ;be eaist aide of eW Hall Houleva4d. 116, addition to this regueetg the timiatift Y� _. t aa�l ®6 reilu ire hy+dr° t bit Valle Aire � Rescue �►i ®t� i.ct: l�aaaa ®e�ea�i, that - a'� instal ed within the project Or fire prote: tiona The .meting fire hydrant at SW Bonita Road and 61 &11 Boulevard wil3 matt likely be an iSaa le due to the t ` . 44cing Of p; i:vate pedpetty a conci S I Haa ►ll noule and and sw Ocnita Road. lt ltim.. 5 C141 C t SUg 91- 1000 RthRt TYC /gA FA 1iDQ e•at; �A • The Stilt* of Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has note( that half - street improvements shall be requireld Along the Hal,r Boulevard Irontage. A permit for this work shall be required fret: ar Additionally, the applicant should provide a right Traffic u lane Plan. ? Hall note SW Bonita Roar, in co> *forma..�,ce with the +Citye' g General ¶Celephon ha.; requested that the developer contact GTE Engineering at lease: 30 days prior to trench opening. Tigard School District 233 notes that the ro seed develop v nt lies �. within the areas xeas of Phil Lewin Elementary School, Yowler � * addle S rhool, and Tigard Senior High School. The proposed development is projected c ted to generate the following additional enrol]x ent at rho® schools; 3 students at Metstler Elementary Schools ` 2 students at Fowler School; and 1 student at Tigard High School. The School District etat e that school capacities are exceeded. However, core facilities are sufficient to consider portable classroom additions. 7. Department, hwest Natural Gas, The City. of Tigard Operations De �.dxwtm ®nti Tart Portland General Electric, and the Area Communications iesion have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objec tionsa ®. NPO 5 reviewed this proposal prior to the applicant's submittal. NPO 5 stete6 that this wan a good proposal and that they appreciated being Able to review a plan that andw ad the cetbacke and allowable building enveloptu3 s 9. NPO 6 reccnmendo that the City pay clove attention to eight distance at ehoul efraurre that�, setbacks oforf the Bonita and ildin gs l Otaff arge Adequate. Staff should also r, t remember that the speed limit on Hal' Boulevard is 45 Mph. it wad ail:. recoemended that NPO 5 ab ®orb the uenaity lose due to htilding at a lawerr density and not buLldinq Apartmenta. • xn response, dtaf i Would ,like to aeeaarr` ► NPO 6 than adequate setbacks Shall be verified and Maintained d through tha building pat it process Vienal Clearance titan aide will not be violated by the Carty, nor will they ba Permitted by any deve op, r or private land own te occupant Bhoulei the etan4arde be violated by a developer or private land owner /occupant, the city shall undertake etendard Code tnforcemen ptocedurcee to � er e t ®ituation a n d see t hat the violation ia corrected. The 45 mph pe ed limit on H Beni eva,rd k.S hot proposed to he a d juated by this pplieat i n s r y to 4ll Th3�e speed limit shall apply peresans dt 1 ving airing this roadway. p . toiling ... •ict, i�, the �h® lot ®i�e�,%dRnsity spe►ci.f3�+sd by eao�► �f the x�oai.n rli.i�1 tires aallowed. The R.-�:q 2 toning Cit. a,r6 aata,ted . .nests oka a p .lied td thin site all..... a t ation of a r�axi tum 4 �arMCimu�u d® a�� ®�.g �; � oars for the c r� 64 reaidahtia t dWel1L gig unit for asVery a, O5O equare Of dev lopabl+e lend T 1 City d ... . to ire .� all land be �develo d at the suoet i � e oonf ig9 rat :on poa ib1o. The Mss City - � irkvsrlitan 1'dOuising. itule (dPlit 650 'Division ' ) requitoo gnat iho atPeraage density ali.owsti foie ale dOvoloPiible residential. land Within the city" a o; toitial pla to it g area Sgt itigiititdit of t n d fell pe � e..... t ing ��n�.is � r a�, ro. This ;�- ...licationa wot��:+� no MgARINdb Clio Fi`7 tok ; - sJ 02-o000 bud TR?' tIl /] 0R hnb 3 t rm PAN 8 •i: - x,due tbar City of Ti and'r housin g opportunity index below its minimum AUh tan unite gar acre of inventoried residential land, nor would this y 9 minimum of multi- family �?� ru�S�- ��ar,��l !touting mix below the 50% r��.rn faaely units pursuant to the Metropolitan, Housing Rule. The City °e ao:cnatdedged plan in 1984 inventoried 1,311 acres of developable reeidelitia1 laud in the City wed this estimated housing opportunity index was 13,110 units. Since then, eight plan amendmente have been approved which in turn have amended the inventory. Therefore, the City' o currant inventory includes 1,290 develapabl,e acaµoe and a hbusing opportunity for 15,112 units (10.16 units Par acre). The building of 1'. t i,ngle family homes, rather than approxiratel + 17 houses or apartments, would reduce the housing opportunity index by only 6 units. This does not reduce the City of Tigard' a housing opportunity' index balow the minimum 10 units per acres on inventoried residential sand, nor reduce the multifamily housing mix below the 50% miraimuie pursuant ` to the metropolitan mousing Rule. Therefore, an approval of this propoeal would not necessitate the replacement of any lost housing opportunities elsewhere in.: the City. 10. Unified Sewerage Agency USA' h ., e reviewed this ro eaz;' and has stated that an erosion control plan in. conformance with the Agency's MO 91 -47, Chapter 5, as amended by 9145, and consistent, with current construction guidelinee, dbhould be required. All new public sterna and sanitary sewer gn Agency's 91-47, Chapter 3, as amended' designs shall conform to the A. enc ° ® Rao 9 Sy 91-754 Oak ale° r.ecoia ends the 9 naitellation of an on -site water panty facility. However, the City magi determine if such a faoility Qe wp 'topriate to the site, Or alterhativeijp, if a fee -in lieu Of shall be acceptable. V. SVAlatIATION of 11.8QUEST Co ` 1 w1111! . r1_Dav eloy��:ro, ; n dQ. . The proposed subdivision complied with the tetei static darda of tie It-42 moaaiea.: ... g di�triot ,10�d ®,�; Cho ._ er : ]l0 ` 54�:b 1b+�cati�ee the lots; are iir � ... .. t , ei e,gle family detached ` g t�nde� to bit) seed tc� cis �e�aiL1 � Waite', a pertaittad use in the z ®nee the eleven 4,100 tc 7,250 equate foot lots are all Sietital to or larger than the atninrum 3,050 equate toot' minimtim lot Mire regrizLreamerit Of the aoine. All nude 2.ot i ahouldt ?be anbjeb to the setback etaatidardie of the Ft-12 Sone. Oftpl once With theta ietandarde will be toviewed as part oa! the oui.S. di.aig )permit t app1 cati oaa pro sea * for iiitaglemofarily hoMeO c n ,itdi v dua3 tots. tot 1, 20 10 sand 11 »°t the basic eblar adceas tetidiVeinitt0a0 as tptdikita in Obde one 0 h boot, ionen nt e luoon t o lf L ngat o 6tisa&tite thesoe iota within 3O d u gre . . - thOae tote glee p rovide it minimum no hproth 1 ®apt .m fee's Loto 3 titiol 0 _nhatt fie` cotifite+d as the 20* exeirotiosi f x'c ,tot toolitekiietittio tote 5, e', 7, and it do not Ora ..• ...40 oit6a ®Alb or both of thede ' dithiMdektd4040M60146 xa Gs orrIcsn sit i 02-0009 ST AALlimismARDs PA.O 9 M1 o LI Section 18.88.�D4 111_,1114.11. allows an anestption of lets duo to existing road patterns which must be dontimt4 through tbs site or must terminate on -site with applicable road l etaeu ds 'Adis a way that prevents given ?.,°et® in Saito development. fres bang orien1;ed for solar acceees he only 00111110tablID EICCIOS toa this site LS through an extension of SW 83rd Court and th ' ari t.ion of a fe► :anc s'.d Coil -de- . ®a�' bt�lb, with a radius Vii' S0 feet. iDrcceeao cannot be connected 1.ri SW Hall Boulevard from SW 63rd Court because of ODOT acco;is standards. Additionally, providing this connection would r reate an improper and haaardon* intersection alignment in relc'Aon to the proximity to the intersection of Ball and Bonita. Thq rreiore, this exertion should bpi & ppl ied to lots 4, 5, a ; end 8. This Code ;section has bean satisfied. • The ro sed subdivision Complies with "UM density "standards of p Po i Chapter 18.92. The net develo ! le area, Of the site (after deduction of the public ri ilat- »ofa;wa y dedication ) is approcimately 53,900 square feet. With a san& um lot size Of 3,050 square feet, this cite yi,®lde an opportunity for 17 � ®l Rio seed. the creation itq.12 zoning designation. The applicant has P Y t ��v lots ., With standard. and therefore, comgl:iee ..��... hie • The applicant had not submitted kz trecn survey of the site as required by SectiOn 18.1504 Theref8 , ,e, prior to the issuance of a tree removal permit,- the applicant wi "l7, n.a ed to Submit, and receive approva , for, a tree removal application form and supply details identif in� the type and size of y � 3� trraeeec on tDD® lite which are reate_: than six inches in dia me ey shall ,� �, titer. This siesta s�aaell identify these trees Which Are proposed roar removal. • TLe proposed sed subdivision La �paon istarit with &)16divieion p p�ci► the approval standards of chapter .$..ol 0 (Subdivisions) becauaeo s a. The proposed eubdivieiou oaliec with the . � ' � vo :hanei ve Vlar Na p' ® 2edirt � idential density b . 9Ltln it y f �� the site a� we�l a ts With th applicable plan li.cies the re ulatione of the x.12 toned and Other applicaeble regulati©n5 the not du lLcati a of any .rr p9 ®st x !sided in W hih proposed yr dressing, County; � e' The proposed public 'street Ot � idaa for a ' at 9 4004 dat4 access to the kits' in this ptopoeed oubd v .� ..t . .. Mora providos for an ex��en ®ion Of an existiaag Street Stub. G. this application is roi.eiitent with the oritetia S ® tiae 1S.160.120 r ®ardin u a eibclivieidD variaide k.41wr n diVerliiiigth de -ear. , . - - � � � �thd ie ... ., e � on 11-611449.41)11q, �.e ®tc � �� of �� £scot. aio� O'i�att� 1.13 @8a� li® � a r of stil 83rd 'Court t40,1, be ettitioAxgt4,tely 6/5 fit the +s .� asie of 8W 83rd I Court i.a the dhilt cedbOttibi0 optiditt f`or pzovidin0 degax to aCce a to _ the ti tN house "C a Ice io l stations to u[ Mill bouleva d... of this +rt **Wad si1'1 l t BEARINGS OFFICER SUB 92 -0009 6. StA gNd /VDWA ? S . d 7i -"A • I�+ detrimental.- to the publto safety and welfare or injurious to th rights of other owners o property. Additionally, this variance is necessary sary for th enjOymekst of a' subatantia 1 property 'rty. right. If thi= variance were to be denied, ;thia land wrculd ;.only be deveaicl.. sl.e t the same density by creation of either an it � the crew undesirable private street, doll i on access tract, or f .ag lots. Alternatively, lots would be lost. lough not requested by the appli,cant, a variance is also nedeseary for lots number 10 and 11. which exceed the maximum lot dept ► to width rata ,i s opecified in Section , ..1.14.2, d L U,), 1 db Shia aoctio a allowa a maximum lot de &k: to width ratio of 2.5:1. Lot .10 M:weeds this requirement by 2 feet, whereas lot 11 exceeds this requirement by 5.5 feet. To t rreot thi N by shifting lot lin3e to the west would reeraire rh' -'t other lots give, up square footage. Again, this nits is in al peculiar situation in that the placement of the road extension coot be aad jested to bring t1 8e two Iota into compliai c ' 0 All eleven lots exceed the minimum hot air a requirement of 3,050 egua re feet per lot eo these would not be any detrimental effect on adjoining ,::, rt,iea it this ceertton . of the vat :lance is granted iiditionally, the erariti ,g of thin variance lend ,; to preserving tkiie proposed s izee o the lots which abut SW Hall Bout- -var+d (]gate 5, 6, and 7) . Tl ih al.lo"wz the greatest ascot ; of flexibility ibila ty for the indivi.dr aa1 placement of the hore s which *e4.2.1 be adjacent to an arterial Therefore, this the variance eh quid be app' ovedd portion of . The proposed subdivision plat Le ou ietent reith the ye uireetents of Chapter 10.164 `St -reet and Utility Improvement s tea dard9 9 , or can l'oe modified to be consistent with geese r quireetent : , because: • The applicant Will be required to inestalI lf-- tri t ,tetprevemente and dedication of additional right eofoway to 60 feet from centerline along the site's frontage on SW Eia11. Boulevard. Thee, i..mproveu. me Ethz11 be designed arr4d, constructed to arterial standaards. Sou hwea t Bonita RoleA is fully improved therefore, no insprovementES are neces eter1J The applicant seha li be required to provide full Width street ir�prevo nts 'et,/ local. Street, etsn die for the extenSien of 6101 03rd Court. • The propelled iota ar enai ate d with bode atandar for same lot« depth o -width rig lib .accept ,ter lots nuMber 10 and 11 elisioh is addreaded t y the th referenced 'variance. i L Lfl um fr'onta+g : on publice atid of aeia appliodbi q dimena i.o4al ®t" hda$rdi'll hAl e 13,040n seam ia add • The e Leti ,sag 11.000 2nd plio nt ° e pleblitoinary plat' for deVoloping banitaty nod ntorn 060 0t0 nn +t 1. , '011'020,141 w,- t r lihta provide for adeklutititti oubitd facil ti:ea. tmol iano a fit r EirigAiuNO a orritsist 008 92-0009 a STA Z11r %p,:0W1 far Issigat edit cry to The subdivision is coneiatent with Policy 2.1.1 because notice of ths application and the public hearing on this item w a provided to the neighborhood planning organization and to owners of property in the vicinity of the site The proposed site has been posted with a = ign noting. that a development application on this sit ® was pending. 2. In order to comply with Policy 4.2.1, a condition is warranted to requir - the developer to prepare an erosion control plan ensuring compliance with erosion control standards for the Tualatin River sin as part of the grading permit application. The developer shall also construct an ors- . =:ite water quality faci . . as required by the Oregon Envixonmenta: Quality Commission and USA regulations . r pay a fee-in-lieu of constructing an on -site water quality f..ciuity. The City's Engineering Department advisee that the site developer bo required to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of an on. -site facility. The site is considered uns eeitable for development of an on -site facility because of its relatively small size and the unavailability of space within which to place the facility. Payment <<..t a fee :wnr, lieu of construction of a facility is uthorized 'by the Oregon Environmental. Quality Coaniataion and USA regulation is cases where it is undesirable or imprac■.ical to construct a facili 3. This subdivision proposal complies with Policy 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and, 74.4 because the applicant will extend public sewer and wet it ayateme to this site and will provide for underground installation of phone, electricity, and cable televi ion lines. 4. The subdivision proposal complies with Policy 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposedilpeovements to the streets within and adjacent to the subdivision should contribute . to a safe and efficient street syst nt in this area The eztenaiora of SW 33rd Court will be required to be improved tenaistent with ,City of Tigard tend rd® for public streets. The anticipated traffic from the eleven residences to be built in the aubdivision are not expected to signific ntly affect teal traffic levels in the area~;. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOVLIONDATION The Planning Division concludes that the proposed subdivision, will 1\iromote the s elateral welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor >,n f j ... � aa�°�.ou ® to urrounding properties provided that developments Which occurs after s Yia (decision oomph r a with tapplicte ble local state and fedetzanl laws. n reriagnition of the findings staf. , recommend APPROVAL of eubdivieion proposal SUE 92 -0009 and Variance VAR 92.- 0017 for the proposed Starlinge Cross,in g subdivision subject to the condiUond which follow. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED; ALL CAI 'OIVIONS SEAM BE SAT/ SPIED AND PUBLIC /14PROVFMENTS S L►L BE COMPLETED OR compraTioN Mali tug r tutiticxW ali' Itasurtgri PRIOR TO ¶ ISSUANCE OF ANIt P ITS FOR CONS RIZITIM OF TEE SUB®$VISTONo Staff contact 4or 11 rec emmeneed cogaditiona ; ,s Chris Davies of the Engineering Department, 63' -- 4171; unless oth®rwia+e noted. HEARINGS Ob F CER SUE 92+ -O0O9 STh, ING /EDWARDS Tgg APPLICANT , r. , REQUIRED TO .,, ,;.;'Ids` WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO RECORDING OP TEX VI T WITH _ WASHINGTON COUP : The a pplicaa +t shall he required to pay the surface water quality fees as este)lished ewer than guideline® of Unified d sewarage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times- The first portion is paid with the public, improvements for that portion of the development which increases the i.. rvious area within tha public right-of-way. The second portion is paid at th .. time of Building Permit issuance which for each ittndividu =1 lots 2. Two (2) nets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for pr liminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) seta of approved drawings and one (1) it :z . d construction cost e = tim= te, all privet -d by a P ofeasional Engineer# eh 11 be submitted for final review and approval. Na;: These Plane are in aa�d$.tiaati to any drawings reg irsid by . the - uitding Division and should only include sheets relevant to public " improvements. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawin t. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control plane Technical Guidance Handbook November 1969. The applicant shall d t ge runoff can be discharged into the stl,n d ina, e' s without significantly impacting propertiee downstream. 8raaaenente shall be provided whet crossing other lots. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall e recorded with each lot accessing a private °- torm drain line. 5 Storm drainage dot , L1® shall be provided an part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic aaap of th storm dr r ; inage lamb service ar a shall be provided As a = upp1e cent to the public improvement plalnao Calculation() shall be b eed on full developm nt of the serviceable area. The loc tiara and capacity of .e dating, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 5. A grading plan shall be aubmitt d showing tho existing and plcoposed . � . ,` ��' plan hied to thecto io f contours and typical f ini®h floor e1eva� on on ea el,evaations at 4 different corners of th fiber pl p barb' lrevations eats a hown on the pnblio improvement plans 70 The aPPlicanunt shall make an 000Lintment fora prea+sonetruction m40tifiegi with the city of ' igla rd Engineering DepartMent after approval of th- public Improvement p1aana but b' fore starting r rk on the eite. The applicant, the applicant' e en4intier and contz aCtcr shall be rekzeiged to attend this meeting prior to r eLving the Approved plans an perthits .. _. 5. The app lcctt shall cbtain a permit itoth t y iQ lRtateb Crav�goa� Hia�►hr�aai tavi ®ions to pe►i"form Work wit . t t. _ g f O . .4 ,.l � y hir has ri ht�aaf'� -��aw a� � '�al,l, �l��l.�a`a�� A copy o 2 the p- e..hit ohtla bad Provided to the city l ngincaerin g" Depar •; nernt prior to iset*a nce of a ilia; Improvethentlierthit. 9. Additione1 right- ofawajr whaI1 be + nva Yea to the ataate, of Orel onq,o y end through its Depa.. .nt of Trans tta tionu` gighn,ay bivisicne! ioang the' HEAR/NOS OF IICiR 5O5 92 0009 - ST 1NN/E W,al' PAg Fl • t •t• G x. �r�,� C 4^ 1:'1 "tut '+� Rit y.;y t`;I{ +°t�� ./r'y� ��'rrS F '•� +.¢�. Y,Y bW%_i�H u � `' "j � .�+ .i._a �r. WIWZIMISSMINROSSOMeaset SW Hall Boulevard frontage to . increase the right of ay tet 60 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing rigkt f -wary centerline. Verification that the conveevence has been subaeltted to the State, shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. NOTE: For additional onal info ation, contact Myron Me lick/ Or on D nt of Transportation, Right -of -Way Section, 7165 SW Fir Loop, Tigard, Oregon '7223, 684-1510 The applicant shall comply with witb the requirements of th Oregon State Highway Division by installing half- street along the frontage of SW Hall Boale ►ard. Two `2) copies of the approved public improveMent plans shall be submitted to the City Engineering Department prior to the issuance of a Public Improvement Permit from the City. Lots 5, 6 and 7 shall not be permitted to access directly onto SW Hall Houlev ed. Lot - 8, a, 10, and 11 shall not be permitted to acceae directly onto SW Bonita, Road, a The applicant shall enderground utilities along SW Hall Boulevard and SW Bonita Road which fronts this development or pay a fern in-lieu of undergrounding Construction of the proposed public improvements and issuance of Building Permits shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans, a street opening permit or construction compliance agreements has been executed, xecution of a developer - engineer agr went and peril -nt of all permit fees. 14. Prior to the plat being rat corded with Washington ,County, the applicant shall provide a 100 percent performance °. sSuranee or letter of commitment. As an alternative, the applicant may have the plat recorded after the public improvements have been accepted by the City of Tigard and Orevon Depart= Department Of Transportation end has posted the appropriate. H.aintenaanc Bond. tree survey identifying the type and size of all:trees.hi.thsu 15. site which are over 6 inches in diameter s l be submitted, survey shall specify thoaas trees which proposed for removal 17L I acs ' unet are ;anri th ublic imo t®. A tree removal permit applied for and approved by the Planning Division prior to the removal of any Such trees one- site. Mum CONTACT: Victor Adori, Planning Division THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE REQUIRED 420 =WU WITH TEE VOZLOWING CDHDITXONS PR/OR TO THE ISSUANCE OF St1IL DING PERMITS: tree .survey identifying the type arid Aso of U treed on the Site which are Over 6 inches in ia:laoter shall be sutmLtte d. This itiototy eh 11 Specify bui�.dire h Which proposed for r ai f i• v d l .ots A treemoval pliytmi t she l :tae applied for and approvet by the Planning Division Sri or to the r val of any suoh t , tees on S TA`F CCNTAt a Victor Adonri, Planning, Di viaiot HEARINGS OFFICER 8U8 92 OOC9 17. A dcsolition permit will Pao required for the removal GI the existing buildings. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Diviaion. 28. The septic tank shall be pumped out and m .11ed in or completely removed. An inspection shall be obtained after the tank is filled or removed. A copy of the receipt from the aping company shall be provided. If the building is conn:Qcted to the public sewer the line shall be properly capped -off, and inspected by the City. STAFF CONTACT Brad Roast, Building Division. SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID ONLY IF THE FINAL PLAT IS SUBHXTTED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. Date Approved By: Dick Bewer . f # Date Senior Pl er 41+73-17-7:_ INGS OFFICER - SUB 92 -0009 - STARLING/EDWARDS PAGE 16 t PROM TJ goad :Manning Department RE SUBDIVISION SUB_ 92 -00 0 '. i CE VAR 92• »002.21,,, MT AI L.� . � S (NPO #5) A request for approval of the following deiv - lopuent applications: 1 ) Subdivision a pp roval to divide a parcel consisting of approximately 1. ,56 acres into ; 11 lots between approximately 4,050 and 7,250 l aare feet i 2) Variance approval to allow development of a cud. -de- sac local street to exceed 400 feet when eam Code suction 18.164 030 (it) allows a maximum cul-de-sac length of 400 f . et. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development C'ode, Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18 100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.134, 13.150, 18.160, and 18. 1.,64. LOCATION: 14600 SW Hall Boulevard (BMX 251 1280, tax lot 1600) ZONE: Y-12 (Re ►idef lal, 12 units/acre) The Re.12 zone allows single family attached /detached residential multiple-family units, residential care k fa�ci.l.3.ti® � ob units, home Parks and subdivioions, public support e. rvicee, family .. day occup ations, tioae a t raay uses, and accessory structures ct�ree among �theases Attached is the : l.te ppli ... m e statement for your review. Fioin pp by p agencies and from other �.nfma�tat,�. ®n supplied b various departments and as Plan and a �.°P�n information available to our :staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 14 1933. Yoll may use the space provided below or .attach a separate letter to return your comments. 24 ...you are unable to.sagpond by ev.q s pleas phone se:etf contact note 1 below t hy hod confir your comments wetting soon as �nni�:n If have Bsa� questions �9�� 13125 SW regarding all ��ti>�. oa�atter:, contact the Tigard possible.. p Tigard, OR ��3a PRO 639- 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry 0f faar -.. w.;.... ..t,. 9LEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MAT PLY We have reviewed the propesal and have no objections to it. Please contaact ,...�., of our office. Please refer to the encl a ed letter. it r 'WA Comments bk/SUB92e09 KE �4y Called to order at 7:35 pin. Presents Carver, Davenport, Kasson, Mitchell, Paris, Sellers Excused: Clinton, Dillin, Watson There were no previous meeting minutes to approve. Agenda items 'i. NPO 6 recommends the City of Tigard Nrchase the 6.68 acres of land directly north of Cook Park instead of the wetlands enhancement tr creation adjacent to Cook PeIrk (SLR 92-0003).. 2. NPO 6 recommends the City of Tigard seek funding from the appropriate federal agencies: 1) Soil Conservation Service - Washington County /State Office 2) ASCS - Washington County 3) RC & D WashingtOn County 4) Federal transportation - Regional Office 3. Have alte rve the wetlands in the g Triangle L h Tigard Triara !e near ,�a�tirraot extension? if so, NPO 6 r�voujd iik to see a written e e: - by next meeting, 4. A Friends of Cook representative (lary Meinin 6 meeting art�:i reported • ger - President) attended the NPO thoroughly fo a l 00 by John Hickox. This area that the 6.� acres of lured ad��ncet'strea Park area was sale for $110,000 0 O��te�'f 'itv � 386 and designated contains wetlands and a perennial a wetland and riparian environment by Mike Houck. 5: a NFO 6 recommends the City the intersection (Bonita and k9l Y close attention to site at t Hall south ). Ensure that the setbacks are adequate. Remember that the speed limit on Hall is 45 mph9 �� density loss due to building at R-7 vs. R - .12+ b. NPO 6 recommends NPO .� a�bs ®bb the o�ras y 6: SUB 92-0007 (Wardin) is on track and moving for rard, 7. Other Buslnegs NPO 6 en si g , preserrvation.' d��t�se� the proposals submitted by Judy �'es�ea� regarding nfo�tr� ®� in their city; with eg no cut pare ry it �ortha�rrraor�a e suggest �'iga�d ®xanraine a Lake Osvu o the idea of adopting a similar policy n Tigard. Adjourned at 6 :55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U K DATE: August 17, 1992 TO: Jerry Offer, City of Tigard PROM: Walter Haight, USA 1, SUBJECT: Starling Crossing PROJECT DESCRIPTION The ` project proposes an l� -lot residential sub%.aiv ision on a 1.55 acre parcel in the city of Tigard. The proposed pe,roject , site is flanked by Hall Blvd. on the west and Bonita Street on the north FINDINGS The applicant has submitted a proposed site plan and a proposed utility plan. An erosion control plan not been submitted. Water q ualit y /quantit y issues have �Oeen addressed. A report on the downstream impacts of surface water runoff has not been submitted. There are no apparent wetlands on the site.. RECOMMENDATIONS r ends approval of this land use application • The Agency repo �catian w��th the following conditions:,. An erosion control plan in conformance with the Agency's a 91 --47, C *.abater 5, as amended by 91-75, and consistent with current construction guidelines, Shall be required; All new public storm and sanitary sewers desiigns ll conform public �ha 6 to the Agency's R & 0 91 -47, Chapter 3, as amended by 9l-75 On -site water uality, facilities are rooMendedf. City d i1i €.ea are howeVer, the Cat c�eterm�.�ea that On -Site gaol be sore tablem r fee-in-lieu shall p inappropriate t�� the site, a tae �� la ZINOJIMMICOM i' 6 North Filet Avenue, Suite 270 i -iiilahmra, Oregon 97124 Phone: 663/646-86g1 PAX: SOS /640436 5 • DATE: __ALubutt _? 4 1992 FROM: Tigard Planning Department S DIVISTCN SUB 92 -0009 VARIANCE wa 92-0017__ STAaLSRaL (NPo #5) A request for approval' of the following development applications: 1) Subdivision n approval to divide a p rcel consisting of oriznatel 1.55 acres into 11 lots b - tween approximately 4, 050 and 7,250 square feet, 2 Variance approval to al. Low development of a cute -d ca sac lo ' su , es , to exceed 400 feet whereas dodos section 18.1644030 - allows a maxa tux cul-de-sac length of 400 feet. APPLICABLE JI CRITERIA: Community ity Development Code Chapters 18.640 18.88, 18. 100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.134, 18.150, 28.160, and 18.104. LOCATION: 14600 SW Hall Boulevard T CTM 2S1 125C, tax lot 1600) ZONE. 12 (Residential, 12 units/ K cre l he R -12 zone allow single family arta:he:� ®detmcied residential units, multiple- family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and cubdivi®ions, public support services,, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, and aaccessaory structures among other us e Attached is the Site Plan and appiioant' a statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recomaliendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wi h to comment on this application, we need yoti comments by Aug. 14, 1992. You may use the apace provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Ifyou are _ raal�l.e+ . tsa raga ai the above date, ple :, so phone the staff contact not d below with your zhamments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you hay any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Doc 23397, 13125 SW Nall Blvd., Tigard, OA 97223. PHONNs 639-4272. STAFF CONTACT .....atgy,Agfer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objecti.onS to it. Please contact ,__ of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Coasments olaNOMMIAMCIONICD mannwsmoorsorwarms trorunramporwomilmoneswimi Name of per ®on Commo tang: Phone Nu aber m 61.e.i t ° o'6. bkm/SUB92-09.BRM itfal iorraiesitiorwsimerworermodmisiaMaihr arig,gor, . 1 :QUE COMMENTS FOR COME a _.. DATE: h'd GMs Tigard Planning Department RE: SUED/VISION sun 92 -0 g 17 s =ggam a (NPO #5) A request for approval of the following development applications: 1 D Subdivision approval div,4ie a parcel consisting of approximately 1.555 acres into 11 lots h tween approxim tely 4,050 and 7,250 squar ► feet; 2 d Variance approval to allow development ' of a u� e s.� c local street to exceed 400 feet whereas 'Code section on 18.164.030 (X) allows a maximum cul-de-sac length of 400 feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code : Chapters 10.54, 1S. S8, 13.100, 18.102, 16.105,, 18.134, 18.150, 13.1600 and 18 164. LOCATION: 14600 8 N' Hall Boulevard (M 231 ,12EC, tax lot 1 i00) SONS: R -12 (Residential, 12 twat a/acre Thy R -12 zone enema single family attach didetached residential units, multiple -family resident i l ,tesf dential care Ito & tiea, mobile home parks and subdiviei.,ana, public suppert eervice family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, and accessory structure among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant' statement for your review. ,from information supplied by various departments and agencies and from ot her informatien available to our staff, a. report and recox a ndat,ion will'. be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by �_ uQ. A! 1992. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. rant rep .� n, ,by.�., tale above date please phone the staff contac noted kalowa�i.foeny� have eiez t�e�a� ±aorecgdl�i.ng�tkni.at�er� contact the Tigard say your Tigard possible. Planning Department, :dam Boa 23397, 13125 SW Hal ravd., Tigard, OR 97223. Piiikoi : 639 -4171® STAP P CP M .Car �f fex PLEASE CHECK THZ POLL' ' /WING ITEM THAT APPLY; We have reviewed the prelpot el and have no objections to it. Please contact of Dior office. Please refer to the enclosed l ; : ;t ;ero Wr'itt =' Comments: 11M1114010, 117ir■VMON.17.100.11.4.0•0101 ivaiwo Name of Person C..^entings....,.,�,...,� Phone Number: bkm /5 92 -O . 3 FROM: Tigard RECEIVED PLANNING REgusT FOR COMMENTS AUG 0 ' 1992 � Y p yy z � DATE: Planning Depaetm nt (5 ) A request for approval of the following development, TM: SUBDIVISION X ON SUBS 92 -0009 VARIAN= V 92e0017 STARLING EDWA s applications, 1) Subdivision approval to divide a pare 1 consisting of a.pproxim tely 1 55 acres into 11 lots between approximately 4,050 and 7, 25© aquate feet; 2) Variance approval to allow development of a cul-de- sac kcal street to exceed 400 feet whereas Code section 18.164.030 (K) allows a maximum coal -ds; -sac length of 400 feet APPLICABLE E ''1EW ` RXA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 1.88, 18.100, 18.102, 18.101, 18.134, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164. LOC ATIQN: 14600 SW Hnll Boulevard (WCT24 281 128x::, tax lot 1600) ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) 'i;le R -12 one allows single family attached /detached reaidenti 1l units. , multiple-family residential uu.,i t®, residential care facilities, mobi l a home parks and subdivisions, In lic support services, family day care, .:lomte occupations, temporary uses, and c esecry structures among ,thee uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a r.wpoa:tt and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment his -application, we need your comments by ,Aa,q,, 14, 1992. You may use the apace provided below or attach a separate l titter to return your comments, 1f u are uraa aa..� to re he a .hove date please phone the staff contaca with ha�ae any elstie�n� regarding oast comments in writing as soon an noted balm/ with your comments and confiraa possible. you y qu r e this matter, contact the Tigaz: i Planning Department, Box 23397, -3125 SW Ball Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223,. MUM: 639-4171. STAPP CONTACT: ... 9 or .:. .r.�...;. PLEASE movieeomenicrowa mumeameneffses C THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal end have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the onclossd letter. Written Comments: Na,i of ] 'ercon coenting Phone tie er: C67-7‘- bid a /sut92 -09 . B semaxiamo �d�� J /.rlr�Mr�rY� rl�r�rwJ atp QUEST FOR COMMENT DATE: .„.. t ,St, __1992 ., 'Eiga s ,%ii Planning Department S!ON SUB 92 -OCO ARIM OE ta- )192.17 S " BJG_/ EDWARDS (14P0 45) A request for approeal cof the following development app1i cation a 41 ) Subdivision approval to divide a parcel consisting of approeimatel.y 1.5E acre . into 11' lots between apprcacimately 4,050 and 7,250 square feet; 2) Variance approval to allow development, of a cui - sac local Street to exceed 400 _ feet whereas Code sectii4on 18.1 'b4.030 (It) allows a mania/me cul-de-sac - de -sac leng h of 40 feet. APPLICATA= REVIEW CRITERIA: Community DOVOlOPM,6111t Code Chapter 18.54, 18. 88 18. 100, 18.102, 18.103, 18a34, 18.150, 13.160, and 18.164. TI 14600 SW Hall = oulevard (WC= 2S1, 12Bc, tax lot 1600) ZONE: R -'12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) The R -alt terse ilowa single family attached/detached residential units, rr,�1tip1e- faai1y re ®1.dentia1 unite, residential care facilities, mobile hemao parks and subdivi,®is3ns, public eupport Services, family day care, home occupation °, temporary u es, and a usry structures among other user ;e. ;attached ja t i,e 0 3-t £1m and 'applicant's statement for your review. Itrom information alapplied by vraari.ote partmenta and agencies and from other information available te osee staff: a report and recommendation will. be prepared and a decision will be rendered ern the propos 1 in the fear future. Ice. you wish to comment on this a pp 1i.�a�xOt, we need your ctraflents by �1�. 14 , X99.,_2 . You ma. y use the ace provided below or attach a separate letter to laturn your c, � . nt e r. ie are r n ±lee t�sr a nd, ► the a da_ polease phone the ste f contact *not d below ith yois coiments and confirm your comments t a writing soon rd possible. g you have any gv:mations regarding this matter, �nt c th ®T3g arl Planning Department, PO Eox 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. : X39 -4171a STS COQ :` tC PLEASE ME= THE FOLLOWING ITEMS aT APPLY: We have reviewed the prOapOeal and have no ob jectien - to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name Of Personn Commenting: as P CD wp ,'r RECEIVED PLANNING AUG 7 °1992 UgSLEALL FOB, et.5 DATE .�,� ��. 1 " f. ...d. FROM Tigard Planning D - pertinent RE: SiBD1VISI®N SUB 92-0009 VAR., 8cE .,9 001 ST .I F (NPO #5) A request for approval of the following development' applications: 1) Subdivision apprvval to divide a parcel coneetsting of approximately 1.55 acres into 11 lots between approximately 4,050 and 7,250 square feet; 2) Variance approval to allow development of a cul -de- sac local street to exceed 400 feet whereas Code section 18.164 030 (K) allows a maximum cul-de-sac length Of 400 feet. feet. APPLICABLE CRITERIA: CC;acs> unity Development Code Chapters le.. M of 18.8i , 18.100 SW 28d]ldx2® 18.1 08, 1 8.134, 18.150, 1t�101C& �� d R?1� ��ialQ��3.a1® 12 Baal Boulevard MOTS 331 12ECC, tax units /acre) The R -12 zone ;'lows single family atts4bedie4:. hed residential units, multiple - family resi 'au ntisl units, residential care facilities, mobil home parks and aubdivisLO ss, public ; upport services, family day care, home occupations, temprary noes, and aoseesory structvre among other uses. Attaglaed� is the Site Plan and applicant's statement _ for your review. From_ �.ss�f tarsanS �. .gym sa;suppa, by eanda�� a� will be prepared ther T ,ed b various dep enta and ag _ ncies and from o information available to sear staff, a rep r ®andirxnecx ne ion wil Ie and a decieias will be rendereC on the 1�,� 1992 you csu wish to �coaaanss�rbt ®�'�. this a separate letter to -m your may use the space provided below or attach need your GatelayXti t by ouc. comments. PP cnmm If ,,faa a are. uxna b e e'tl a above dal , please phone the staff contact noted below lwithAL ourec ants and Confirm your comments in writing es soon as possible. you have any questions regarding this matter,, contact the Tigard Planning Departieent, PO Pox 23397, 131'6 SW Ball ,:; lvd., , Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: XX XX We have re sewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please cssntact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written ents argormarstraroasessamsi +jr1111ti Name Of lbexrr,...an Commenting: � .a,.y.,., .....�,....�. Phone number: 721 -2449 blun/OUB92-09.BKH 112 X119 '1;1 X37 zfCT .*7 114 11.21P)'.91 .P. 11%33 qv, 5 ST, 217• 5. MAT Oa SIM Cr ALL MUD LOT LO IA l i t� 1� �.* RECEIV NNING 1 . AggnsT FOR COMMENT AUG 1.4 1992 • eil .' A DA:E: 42 gt 1992 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RN: s.0BDIV BION SUB 920009 VARiANg?. VAR 92 -0017 T.'ARLING ODW: S ( P0 #5) A request for approval of the followi g deveizikment applications: 1) Subdivision approval to 4 ivide a parcel consisting of approximately 1.55 acres into 11 lots ;aetween approximately 4,050 and 7,280 square feet; 2) Variarade approval to allow deve10 %ent of a cul -de w eac local street to exceed 400 feet whereas Code section 18.164.030 030 ]R) allows a maximum cul-de-sac length of 400 feet. A$'PLTCABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Cede Chapters" 18.54, 18.88, 18.100, 18.102, / 18.160, aat�•.:, 18.16x. LOCATION: °1460 ! W Hall Boulevard W T$ 281 X2BC ,tax lot 1600) ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 ) - 9 family units/acre) The � 1.2 zone allows single fam�.]L attached/detached residential. unit _•, multiple-family resident.,,• „gib units, residential care facilities, mobile home 9 ark® annddisubdivisions, public support aE rvicea, fanvil da' care,. h e, occup ,, na, .: temndrary u€ S, Cr d. .accessory ®tructuas es among other'uaee AUG 1111*ROLTIM #176% -S 1992 611,1900ATIONS COMMIss o Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement, for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencield and from other information available to cur staff, a report and recommendation mendation will be prepared and a decision $:1,11 be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to cc r n at on thY,,o application, we need If your mnents by Auq� .4 a 1992. You may the space provided below or attach a eda a etter to return your comments. ou a un 1e to sa nb t e. above , ate. Tieaee phone the staff contact nc,ted below your commento and confirm Your 'c onts in writing as soon as regarding t . matter, contact the Tigard possible. ; a you have Bon 23397, 13125 SW .gall a vd mat Bard, OR 97223. PHCN: P� �*aaa3.a� Dg aa�tmen 639-4171. . STAFF CONTACT _ .erx°ites ,�...�.:. PAR CHECK TER FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT 'i APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no 1 � � � objections to it Q eiairiciegeirnmesi Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. written Comments= tme of Person c sting: �, 'WOrPAA Phone Number: b) /S'UR92 -99 a B e. RECEIVED PLANNING AUG 11 1992 DATE: l amagi As ,m X: Tigard Planning Department RE: SUBDIVISSION SUED 32 -0009 VARIANCE VAA 92-001' sTAR] xitg EDA? ' . ns (NIPO #5) A request for approval of the following development applications: 1) Subdivision approval o divide a a r parcel consisting of approximately 1.5S anros into , �. a pk o ximate1y 4,050 and , 250 square feet; 2) Variance approval : to allow development of a cul -de - lac local street to exceed 400 feet whereas Code section 18.164.030 (K) aliowe a, maximum cul-de -sac length of 400 feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA; Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.88, 18.100, 18.102, 18.134, a , 18.160, .. lot 16 and �O> 18.164. LOCATION: 14600 SW 18 518, �8. x.60, and 18.1: R-12 (Residential, 12 L3all Boulevard oamms 2S1 128C, tax unite /acr(J) The R-12 zone allows single family attached /detached aresidant!.al uni e, multiple- family reeidenti? l units, residential care facilittee, mob „e home parka and subdivisions, public support services, fami ly day care, home gc cup atiena, temporary Uses,. and accessory structures among other aaaev Attached is the Site Plan and applicants statement for your preview. From information, supplied by various departments recom�agencies and l. from other .� formation available to our Staff, a'r po be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the propo al in the neat future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. i4, 199A. You may urda the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. I f cm are' unable to . roe ond b the above. ' date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comm4ente add confirm your comments in writing ma soon a:s possible. If you have any questions regarding this Matter, contact the Tigard Platining Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Ball Blvd., Tigard, 0E97223. PHONE: 639 -4171 3TAi► P CONTACT „„ Ony Offer PLEASE CHECK THE i'O xNG /TEM3 THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no obiectiene to it. .�..,.m Please contact of our: office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written CoMMentMe resiarsamosserannisoroteio g 7 Name of Persaloia CoDaaneiat� : Phone N, er _.. b /sUD92 -09'e BJCi61 Loi y Haglund Adrirtistratiotl Center 13137 S.W Pacific Highway Tigard, Orego;a .9743 Tel.„ ( 503) 620.1626 FaX (503) 684 -2296 pity of ts r'r Jerry Offer/Pfr oning ire ►artr e 1 P.O. B0X 23897 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear 'Ir, fifer: In response to your .reque8t for comrnerats an the development `called Starlings do the East k Crossing 92 �10Q9 side of dpi and South aide of Bonita, ' �� ( i i�c�t�d the attached Is °submitted as a statement ►4f im'pact , Sincerely, , Bud Hillman E irector of Operations Steve Stolze Jerry Edwards RuSs JOk LEGIBILITY STRIP Development Number of Units., Elementary (Phil Lewis) intermedl.ate (Fowler id.. Sch•) High Stool (Tigard Sr High TH HFR - T lRLRTIN SCHOOL DISTRICT nd C ®� O # TT EOUNTY RE II3E TIFL. 1 PRCT STRTEMENT Starling/ Crossing Sino a -. Family 11 multi` - Far si:y rr School Design Actual Capacity Enrollment 500 384 4 Current impact of Available prior Approved Capacity Developments 119 _ 10 9.00. 769 131 1465 1535 Status of School Impact .I_ uc" Date 9/10192 5` impact of this Development 6 Ael)ued School Capacity Requ ;ement (Siam of columns 294 &5' 3 � g 78 • 3.4 882 1614 For explanation of columns 1 through 6, see code on back sheet. School(s) capacity not exceeded (column . 6 less than column 1) School(s) capacity exceeded- -core facilities are sufficient to consider portable additions Sufficiency determined; by requirements of Uniform Building Code and/or City County codes. Schools) capacity exceeded--core facilities insufficient to consider portable additions. Additional capacity may be provided by tier options under consideration by the Sem! District which include: grade level reconfiguration, rescheduled school year, boundary a.djustrwas, double shifting, busing to under- utilized= facilities, future bond measures leading to new consion, and other housing options. These option and statements have been prepared by Tigard -Tualatin School District Administration Staff and approved by the Board of Directors. This school impact statement is for the above indicated development, and is valise for 120 dal Signed Bud Hillman Director oil Operations auo Transportation (684 -2221) LEGIBIUTY STRIP IMPACT STATEMENT ODE. Column_ 1 School capacity reflects the number of classrooms, portables on site, and Special Education program accomodations at an individual school. Column 2 Actual current school enrollment:- kindergarten has been computed at one -half. Column ° 3' Current, available capacity - difference of column 1' and column 2. Column_ 4 Impact of previously approved developments - determined by S .loot District housing formula (see School District Housing Formula shown below) Column 5 impact- of requested development Determined by School District hou ing- formula. Column 6 Adjusted school capacity requirement - determined by the sum of columns 2,4 and 5 and places developmental request, in A, B or C category., fiCf HOUSING` FORMULA. SCHOOL DESIGN CAPACITY Single Family Dweiiinga 0.43 0.32 0.14 0.07 0.53 Pre-first grade children per dwelling Elementary students per dwelling Intermediate students per dwelling High_ school students per dwelling Total school age students per dwelling MIA Itl ,le- ar it ' D�rd iilae+� s 0.07 Elemer iary students per dwelling 0.03': Intermediate students, per dwelling; 0.02 High school: students ` per dwollrng 0..12: Total school age students per dwelling Tigard High School Tualatin High school Fowle; Junior High Haze!brook Middle Sch 800 Twality Junior High 900 CFT Elem. 570 Mary Woodward Bern. 6 0 0 Durham Elem. 425 Templeton Elem. 560 Metzger Elem. 650 Phil Lewis Elem. 500 Byrom Elem. 600 Tualatin Elem. 600 Bridgeport Elem. tO0 TOTAL 10525 lRRENT ENROLLMENT AS OF 7/31192 1535 957 769 698 724 465 607 366 51' 9 458 381 549 611 570 9126 tTOST' FOR C MPISENI r n rslewsrlSar,: DATR:. e ltee pet 4� RECEIVED PLANNING AUG 1,11992 FL OM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SUBDIVISION _ Salk 92-0009, , i iM1; N '92 - ®OA7 STA►i Le ED!RDS (NPO 15) A request for approval of e following development applications: 1) Subdivision approval to divide a parcel con®ietiing of approximately 1.55 acres into 11 Iota between approximately 4,050 and 7,250 square feet; 2) Variance apparoval to allow deve10 rent of a cul-de- sac local street to exceed 400 ffet'i wdncreas Code section 13.164.030 (IC) allows a maximum cul-de-sac length of 400 feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Comenity Development Co d Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.100, 28.102, 18.108, 18.134, 38.150, 18.160, and 18.164. L0CA ?I0N: 14600 SW Hat13. Boulevard (WCTM 231 1280, tax lot 1600) ZONE: Ra-12 (Residential, 12 units/a ) The R-12 one allows single family attached /detached . residential unite, ' multiple- family residential unite, ',residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivisions, public sup r't services, family day care, home occupations, temporary , useso and aoce61190ry structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant' a statement for your review. Prom information reupplied by various departments and agencies and from .other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a deeizi' n will be rendered on, the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment can this application, we need your comments by Aug. 14, 1992. You may use the space provided below or aLtac , a separate letter to return your comments. If vc meet; unable to rssno a Ab' e above date please phone the staff . coni%:act meted below with your comments an confirm your comments in writing ae soon as postoilolee. If you have any questions regarding this smatter, contact the Tigt rd Planning Department, P© Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall. Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639:- 4171. STAFF CONTACT Jerry ogler PLEASE c 1 c THE FOLLOWING ITS THAT APPLY: We ba\ve reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it Please contact of our. office. Please refer 'to the encloe -d letter. Written 'a m ante tow t- - '" _ -%°'i. r Ylrrielymar imsrrerso YrlcssorrlY /mime/ onionammnsolikorriiiimeinwanies M Nam of Person Commenting: Phone Numbelr:._., eem/suB92-09.BFA • oniideraiimpsimaroweirlio fmrl� a.l ;. RUG 11 92 02:45 REGION 01 HWY DIV Y. 9 psommommENTS To: M Aucat s 24 ..all TRIM Tigard Planning Department P.1 Ida gale ► , SUB 92-0009 VAR •; 92 00 7 S' INEA4, � request for approval of the following development n appu atsono s 1) sutw: tvieioa approval to divide a parcel consisting of approximately 1.55 acres into 11 hots between approximately 4,050 and 70250 squa feet; 2) variance approval to .allow deVelopMent of a Jeldde sac 400 feet whereas Code s�sction 18.164.030 (U) allows K a maximum cul-de-sac length of 400 feet. APPLICABIg REvIEW CR TEALAh- community Development Code Chapters 18.540 18.88, 18.1000 16..102, 18.108 18.134, 103..,150, 18.160, and 18.154. LOCATION: 14600 SW all Boulevard (WCTli 251 1200, taz lot 1600) SSONE : `Residential. 12 units/acre) The R -12 zone allows single family attached /detached residential units, multiple-family residential unfits, residential care facilities, (mobile hoame park and subdivisions public support services, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, and accessory et uctUa`es .among other uses. Attached i ` the Site Plan and ap 1icant' a3 stateaalent for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other inforMation available to our staff, a report and Irecommerdation Will be prepared Y and eci ion will be rendered on It% rendered the proposal its the near future. if you wish to Coxent on this application, we need your comments by a 14, 19,22e 'Qu ,ma use the apace below o a separate letter to $eityC$ your comments. a1 t� �.1,e .ld .� nl� �� '�ms....daes. please phone the staff contact noted I with your comments a d confirm o Cents in writing aab coon as posea lea If yeti haw any estz.ons regarding this matter, contact the 'Zigar l Planning b pant, PC Foxe 233c)7, 1;4125 SW gall Blvd., Tigard, OR 972231 PHONE: 639 -4271. 8TAFF CONTACT: .7er Offer ABASE Cligcx INS '- TAT APPLY: matarmanmemmen rormarawannw • A1A oil We have reviewed the pr posal and have no objections to it. Pease contact of our office. Paean* refer to the enclosed letter sr jtten Comme t!)to; Name of Perron G me ins; Phone Number: bkm suB91 °09 e9 I ► i -ltTMM brand f 2($r'ansmitta riiem0 7+ ` lb II 1 174*0 0 of Fast a r. +. J RRQI ST _ FOR.COMMENTS > Irmo ikinnomssorassammonemsarroautommamosa FROM:' Tigard Planning Department /VISION request 00 9 o XAN VAR 9 001 STARLY'A$C MiW► DS (NPO #5) � approval of the following development a licationn. 1) Subdivi ion approval to divido a parcel consisting of i 5 between approximately 4,050 and ..!� rox�aate�l • 1.55 acres .into 11 lots 70260 sg as re feet; 2) Variance approval to allow develo nt of a culmde -- Ba c local street to exceed 400 feet whet as Code section 18.164.030 (K' allows a makimum coal -de ..-8ac length of 400 feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 10.88, 18.100, 16.102, 18.108, 18.134, 18.1500 18. 160, and 18.164. LOCATION: 14600 LW Ball Boulevard (WCTpi 281 12BC, tax lot 1600) '2OPB: R-12 (Residential, 12 units /acre) The R -12 one allows single family attached/detached residential units, multiple- -famizy residential units, ` resieeni is l care facilities, mobile home parks and aubd vLaioaas public suppot:t services, family ay care, ho occupations, tempoi ary mimic ant icceru ory structures among other u1300. Attached its the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your' review. From information sn! plied by various depa rtrrenta and agencies and frm other inform ton available to o1ir .:taf f, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Auc. 14, 1932- You may use the apace prava.ded below or aatt�.,.ch a separate letter to return your comments,. lf,you are i+)lla b , ge® ►n. the above date p eante phone the staff contact noted below with your comaients and confirm your OcOments in writing as Soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding s g matter, � Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223. PHONEs 639 ,-4171. DA :M M ,h ig3 t�aat 4 - 9 19 ST 'F CONTACT tt aerty Offer. PEE CEECtK THE FOLLOWING ITEHS THAT APPLY s We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Plotted contact of our office. Please refer to the ®nclo ;red letter. ..®,; Written tents: Watt Of Person CoMMentingt Phone dtttameber bkm/B0B92- 09.81 t MEMORANDUM CIWY OF TIGARD, OIGO%i TO Jerry Offer August 12, 1992 Review I° O : Chris Davies, Development Re ' Engineer a410, • �n : SUB 92'"0009 - STARLING/BDWARDS Bescr„i,�ctiom The applicant Proposes to approximately 1. S5 acres into eleven (11) lots. d.,� �Also equested is a variance to allow development of a cul-de-sac street to exceed 400 feet, which is the maximum allowed by code Find na 1. Streets The site is located on the southeast corner of S.W Hall Blvd. is and S.G. Bonita Rd. S.W. Hall Blvd. s under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation. the applicant has 4 preliminary Y p ., � to shown on the rel.im$nar lens dedication of right-of-way t 60 feet with half street improvements. The State has recommended that the applicant be required to provide half - street improvements and dedication of Right- of -WaY to 60 feet from c:e iaterline along the frontage of S.W. Hall Blvd. The Engineering, Department agrees , with these recommendat ions and as shown or the preliminary plans the applicant is proposing to comply with these requirements. S.W. Bonita Road is classified as a major collector orb t and is r fully improved along the frontage of the site, Therefore no additional requirements should be required. The applicant is proposing to extend S.W. . d Court. .W. 83rd Ct. is classified as a local street,; the applicant is proposing to provide full street improvements for the extension of 83rd Ct , that will serve this development . ted a variance The a l�:ca�nt has requested ... . . �de�. applicant . e to the length of cut. sac . The Community Development Code Section 18,164.030(K) allows a maximum cul-de-sac length Of 400 feet The applicant is proposing a length of approximately 465 feet. Based on the FN ZN :�;I�T col! NTS SUB 9209 $VAR14]14G EDW S 4 • • +Y. w existing , � ' �- and � iate d +��e10 mnx�t conditions and location this is a logical a 't�' nsion of an existing road and it allows for appropriate p of the property, thea:•e is no suitable alternative access point for this' parcel. Therefore, the variance should be approved. ▪ Sanitary Sewer: Th,are is an existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer, line located Within S.W. 83rd Court. The applicant is proposing to connect to and extend to sewer line to serve this development. sewer line has sufficient capacity to serve this development ▪ Storm Drainage The applicant is not proposing to extend any of the existing public storm sewer system located in S.W. Hall Blvd or S.W. 83rd Court. Based on the information presented by the applicant � the capacity pp nt a.t appears that the existing system has t; e and was des igned to handle e �p e The applicant should be required to sub evadenoethat the existing system does in fact have the cal y and is designed to accommodate this development established and the City has The Unified Sewerage Agency has estabi .r No. �i��7) Surface agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order Water Management R .. g ulatio ns requiring'.._ construction o f on- site water quality or fees in-lieu of their construction. Construction of an on -site water quality . treatment facility is not appropriate because the site is r,.malJ, compared to the development plan, and the loss of area for the on-site facility ; :; t . n ite facilit would preclude thy. effective developmen� In , requiring ; quality facilities onccsmall addition re uirin surface water c�ua1�. sites would result in numerous facilities that would maintenance burden to the City,, Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities and there are no natural depressions or other areas of this site that are particularly suitable for water quality facilities. Regional facilities, funded of these faci1itiese ded by fees in lieu of would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and less maintenance: Therefore the applicant should be required to pay the fee in -lieu of constructing an on-u ite facility. Re c ommendat is on s.,+:: N S' .. SIiAL7.� • BE SA.T I SF T FD 01 I..N1C (ALLY ASS D PRI OR T4 RECORDING THE PlAT WZTH WASEZNGTCN •CCUNT.Y* p � be r�q�a� red to pay th ...,. ', J. `rhe a plicant Shall e fc�' s as e tabl.�.shed tinder the guidelines of trot i :d. Sewerage Ater Cy 1.esoiut ofl a td' Order 1o. 91 --47: NOTE: This is a. two pact fee rh .ch is paid; at efferent times : The first portion' is paid �ith the ubl,ic p � I ,NTS :'• SUB 92 -09 r. �NCZ�IEERI�TG' Cl? .a. I improvements which is for that portion of the development which increase the im. p ervious area within the public ri gnt-o f_way ., The second portion is pail "t Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lob.. Two (2) _ sets of detailed pubic improvement plans and profile construction drawings shad be submitted for p reliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all +- W fitted for prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be sub�1 final review and approval (NOTE: these plans ` are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvE,ments • An erosion control plan provided `public o �" trot lam an,all be rove. dod as part of the improven,.ant drawings The plan shall conform to Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, Noveroter 1909. ▪ The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing draintigeways without significantly .impacting properties d.o hstreamr • Storm drainage details shall ,be provided as part of public g � p the improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin service area shall,, be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 6. A grading plan Shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours and typical finished floor elevations on each lot, including elevations at 4 different corners of the floor plan tied to the top of curb elevations as shown oil the - public improvement plans. 7 o The applicant shall make an appointment for a pre- construction meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of the public ,improvement plans but before starting work on the site. The appllca,nt, the applicant's engineer and contractor shall be required to attend this Meet.ing ' prior to receiving the approved piano and permits,, The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State i i- � '' � i ate`of� Oregon ' 8. Highway hwa. Division t� perform 'taork within the right of way of saw. 1, 71 Blvd. A copy of the permit shay 17!� the C ty Er`i a ineerin� � Department prior to iss'uanC � of a 't olio a Inpx. ove tent Permit. - .- way.° i � �idt��.t3on � of • . ; . �zt _ of �va� shall ��,iea�rtmen�. . al, ri ... � � ©f � Trans'��, . State its Drp portat.on, � g � ,ghwa Div :hna o t.? e . W 1.1. i�lvd m font ge to E TN ERING CO TS $U r, e V.•. 4 r IMAM increase the right of -way to 60 feet from centerline,, The description shall be tied to the existing ri / cent- rline. Verification that the conveyance bas been s urbmitted to the State, shall be provided to , the r' .y Engineering Department. (''or additional informatioll, contact, r , portation, i.ightlof+-Wlay �yrC -n ��el1Cl�, Oregon Department of `�.'r��'ls Section, 7165 SW it L,00pt, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 684-15:L0)00 10. The applicant shall comply with thy: requirements of the Orogon sate Highway Division by installa.ng . half- street slaml the frontage of S s MY t) Hall Blvd. Two (2) copies of the City public i,mpir overnent plans shall 'be submitted to the , o ,may Inq n 4 eeraing Department prior to the issuance of a Pu% Improvement Permit from the City . 11. Lots 5, 6 and 7 shall not be permitted to access directly onto S .W Hall Blvd. Lew csyy�8 - 11 shall not be permitted to access directly, onto .. S •W. Bonita l Rd• 12 . The applicant shall underground utilities alog S.W. mall Blvd. and S.W. BQnl ta Rd which fronts this development or pay a fee in- lieu of ur►dergrounding. 13. Construction of the proposed public improvements and i s auaace g after the of Building Permits shall not commerce until .;aft. , , g approved thr•� public Engineering Department has reviewed and appro improvements plans, a street opening permit or construction coin:..1 i nce agreements has been excuted, execution of a developer' engineer agreement and payment of all per ►it fees 14. Prior to the plat being recorded with Washington Count the applicant shall provide a 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment. As an alternative the applicant may have �� improvements , . .. m�ltnt C � the plat recorded after the public improvements have been. by Tigard and Oregon Dep:., rt C n and of .. a accepted b the Bond. Transportatio d has posted the appropriate IN ADD HOULD BE `AWARE OF THH FOLLOWING SICTIONS Al �P�ICANT OF THE I COI )t ITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN A CLUS1V] LIST. 1. SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement. Ae Before City approval is cer +,ified on the final plat, ; and . ( �� .. .. the before approved C obstruct � on Plans are issued by City, the Subdivider shall: 1 r EXPcute and file an agreement With the City gngineer S '�.fying the period which all regUired k �9��a: rioC� I y� i.,1ovements and repairs shall be comnplMteda and ENG /N2ERINC CO to T ... LING /EOM tDS �P. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the w't)rlc and recover the full cost and expenses from t7p,e subdivider. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as Nay be required be paid and may also �:. ret to provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract . SEC I O1 13.160.180 Bond A_ As required by Section 18.160 a 17th, the subdivider shall file with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: 1. An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financia1, institution authorized to transact bus : sness in the State of Oregon; A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remains in force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or 3. Cash. The subdivider shall furnish to the City En i e �r a itemized improvement estimate, certified b y a registered civil engineer, to assist the city Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance. The subdivider shall not cause termination of nor allot expiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City:, SECTION 18.160.190 Filing and Recording , Within 60 day s of the City review and ` approval, the applicant shall submit the final plat to the County for g y s Yu red b= OAS Chapter signatures of County officials as required . 'Upon fina , reco dint with th,e County, the lapp scant shall submit to the City a mylar cd►py oaf the recorded .at m EI'1TS SSE 92 09 S." I14C/ b r At � '.. Calms ed • SECTION 18.162.080 Final Plat Application F a omisSio e'° uiremen is • Three copies of the Partition plat prepared by a land Ourveyor licensed to pr.aet .cc- in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. . The paxtitio . A lat and data or narrative ,;shall b,,L, drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Orecon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the Cit of Tigard. • SECTW .N 3.8„162 .) i0 Centerline Monumentation ?on'iamefirtt Boy Requirernents A. Centerline Monumentation or all Major Partitions: 1 . The centerlines of all str_Oet ant roadway` rights -of- Way shall be monumente as Prescribed in ORS 92,060 (2) before City acceptance of sheet improvements under the following/ specifications: s . Centerline monuments are required tc baSse monument boxes cc)refor ring to City standard'45 set for those monuments within the pavement Area; and } • The tops of all monument boxes shall be set to finished pavement grade. • 18.164.120 Utilities 1. All utility lines inciud'ing, but not limited to those x equ . red for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities ' shall be placed d. except for srfrface ed ut�de.rg�o�:r mounted tr ansfOriers, Surface mounted nt ed onnecti0% boxeV. and toter cabinet s Which May be placed abov ground, temporary Utility service facilities during constructions high capacity) Lectric lines 6Vetatii g at 50,000 volts Or above. • 18.164.130 isasdl or Bond Re?quli,red 1, Ali improvements installed by the subdivider shall . keguaranteed as to nshp and Material a period of olze Year following a ca pt ande ti y C� � Cit y � 2. SuOh guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bocid in the amount of th0 value of the improve isnts as set by the City ling, n ar. 9 ST ING /E E�`GINELRI�TC: (oI�kE�1T5. SUB ,.2 © 3 e The rash or bond shall comply with the terms aud conditions of 'S action 18 .160 .3.80. • 10.164.150 installation: ?rereguisite / ?era it Fee; 1 ▪ No land division improvements, incltldir.14 sanitary; sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirement shall be undertaken except after '`the plans therefor have been approved ' errait fee paid and permit issued. by the �,LtY r ,I, 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. 2 a If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not kle resumed until the City is notified. 18.164.200 Engineer's C'ert ,ficati. n Ikequired ▪ The land divider's engineer shall provide written certification of a fort provided by the City tent all improvements, workmanship and matez °iais are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grader prior the City acceptance of the subdivision's imp wovements or any portion, thereof for operation and maintenance. ENO*0$ERINJ COL'.lL"1JL' t L 5 0 100 •CEVED PLANNING AUG 13 1992 PROM: Tigard Planning .' q,' oarttnient SUBDIVISION_ - - SUB q`c -0009 VARIANCF, VAR 92- 001,7 sTARuggapwAnDs (NPO #5) A request for approval al thm following development applications: 1) Subdivision approval to divide a parcel coneis *t,i t*g of approximately 1.55 acres into 11 lots between approximately 4,050 ,and approval to allow development of a cul -.de- sac5locaa. street to exceed 400 feet whereas Code section 18.164.030 (K) allows a maximum cul-de -sac 'length of 400 feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, ? 8.88, 18..100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.134, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164. CATION: 14600 SW Hall Toulevard (WCxM 1280, tax lot 1600) ZONE: R--17 (Residential, 12 units /acre) The R-12 zone allowse single family attached/detached, residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivisions, public ear iport services, family day care, home occupations, temporary ruses, and acceersaory structures among other uses a Attached is the Site Plan an.l applicant's statement for your review. Frew 5T 9R COMMENTS; information ,supplied by various departmcnts and agencies and ` from other information availablse. to our atafZ, a 7tepart and recommendation 4,1i.71.1 be prepared and a �e rendore we the proposal in the yea. '4 ure. If yon\ wish wilt aY to comment Bon this application, icadion, on need your comments by A.0 4, 1992. Yo■t may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If ou are unable to r e wi n d _ b y l t h e , abomAttga, plea>ee phone the staff contact noted below with your cos ents and confirm your comments in Writing as soon as 1f possible. If you � have vain eetione regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning �Depaartmenrt, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT, e, e of f_ PLEASE CHEC1 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT ,i4,I A We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it P1' ^ ;ra y.ontaot of our ,Bice. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comm'ntn m Water i ect to the extension of a cul- de -sac1 street The �I�tes D��.strr�.ct< doffs object he Wa -er D1s r1ct 1 i5 obj &pct exceed: vg 4�0 feet ?der" g.s -ve � .' ; ,Lf .. ba dente .r 3 a ixi:: ., :nude for a 10 foot waterline easemo r s e s • nt to SW Hall Blvd. between lots 5 and 6. The District is also requesting that the developer extend their proposed -inch waterline along the cssemert and conned to t waterline he existing irate, main on the east side of 5w Hall sled. to addition tip this Nav►e o Perqion Coentitn •¶i lie Fhotte f 3 4x 5 5 4. re4u'a t the Tualatin Valley 'ire & Re cue has also regl a 3ted. b s /glT392.49 : saw[ fir °e hydxdnt be ,nstal..ed within the 'roj ect for fire proteotioia e Th� e�lstln fa.�e h drantr at �W Bonita toad nd �' �a11 B vd will most �. ]del �,e urousab�:e clue t:o fen. CyJC'1 tv7 Y',1Vc, a C3 sW �; all Blvd. and' � �n a Road 12 -inch that a QUEST Ft9i?, C1NI�i'1'S, DATE; ,,. 99' FROM: Tigard Planning Department a.. (NPO * 55) ©N S re 2 st for zapproval 0 2 t h oriowinr • development �pp , ' 4 Pp o divide a parcel. consi `t) ng of applications: �.! Subdivision a rovsl � -• - approximately 1.5S acres into 11 lota between approximately 4, (50 tInd cM ,0 � 1 2 * approval to allow dovelop »ent of a c.1--de- � street to exceed 400 feet whereas Code aect s on 18. 164.030 (K) allows a maximum cul-de-sac i ngth of 400 fed t. APPLICABLE REVIEW CAXTBRIA. Community Development Code ChapterrB 18.54, 18.88, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 28.134, 231 1211C, 0taut lot 1600) ZONE: i (Residential, 12 Hail Boulevard 6 1 y `- , 12 unite/acre) The D-12 zone allows single family attached/detached leniden tia1 unite, nn 3 tiple - family residential, unite, residential care faiJi1itkes, mobile home parks and subdivisions, public support services, family day care, home occupations, teMporary usesy and accessory structures among Sher Ansee • AttaCled is the Site Plan and applicant c s statement for your review. From information ugplied by various departments and a g en cies and from other n Ormation available to our staff, t report and recommendation will be prepared and �a d cisi this will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to application, we need your comments by rings JA; 1992. Yor. may u ae the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. /Ars inithle_ .to aces _ b ► the abavre date please phone the staff centadt y writing as sopa as Y.o��:ea B'relc,v with your cc�omaent� and omnn�Asc�r gur comments: in posei le. If you have any 3etio g Tigard, contact the V gcard ns regarding thy.® matter', coni�a P 3 A PHC1 s •„ Planning 22 " -41710 n�, � �' Pl vd n y Tip ard, 63Ft ®39 g 13125 SW Hall �! t9 Iilt STAFF CONTACT: der 4yf iCer �,nw��tsar�:ri: PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WHAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no ob jectiano to ,it. Please contact of out office. c..."- �Plca®e' refer to the enclosed letter. IIIIIIIONSIIINIMMIMOMM Written Comments: Nam of Person Commenting Phone tt1kebC3g` � ..� bkm /SuD92 -09 PACE • 0 A deino4ition permit will be required for pumped reiaova1 of, th lIt ex st ing buildings . ��e septic tank shall be out and filled in or eompiately removed. An inspection shall be obtained after the tank is filled or removed. A copy of the rec i.pt from that, Pum Ping company shall be provi.ded,.. If the Building. is connected to the public sewer, the Nine shall be properly capped-off, and inspected by the city. in shall be provided as I have indicated on the o Private stet drains p fans for lots ,,..1=4„,„ easements shall be provided where crossing other lots. The minimum pipe size, of a privat y. rain drain shall be as follows: ,Serving 3 6 houses 6 inch A oint access and aintenance agreement shall, be recorded with each lot accessing a private storm drain. As follows: Lots 1 -4, shall h. ave an equal al right ight. to utte and an obligation t operate and maintain tDAe private drainage facilities within the private or public drainage easements as shown. Building Fipisaon [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]