The URL can be used to link to this page

SUB1992-00007POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. +50 / SO 100hAve. 2$1 11C11, 14 0e ,15001 es 1501 gibs . �rtw�wr.., is p ,�«Mi.:k:'..c. .= akwW "wA r5r.ih�Y:u.u,r t:+n't'h w�: isi3: 1:^ u' uUll�. t:` 1' �I++ L�; x+:" a"i^ yL':: islS ;FtitL�::+l1.;i:,�'.".ti+ "3•" +i µ'7n11:...2 ^~ �143�M t4 .4; n r v,. .• ;�1 ' ;!6 A.d; .e ... 6ti 'fi�:'7}'.' . . January :12 , 1994 Ferd Wardin P.O. Box 310 Newberg, OR 971x2 y .0007 RE: Tree Survey for Lady Marion Saa��.v�.�6.e�n�'� X92 Dear Mr. Wardin: Recently the City has received several inquiries from concerned neighbors regarding the potential for property damage due to trees falling during periods of high wind in the area of the Lady Marion Subdivision. One r = sident indicated that tree had recently fallen causing several hundreds of dollars in damage to the fence on his property. Although several of the individual contractors have applied for and received Tree Removal Permits for specific lots within the subdivision, these permits have been related to trees located towards the front yard of each lot due to their being directly impacted by new construction. The Final Order for the subdivision stated that the Planning Division may require the applicant to provide a tree survey to be performed determine which trees should be erfor�e�. feAr the site in order to d.�ste preserved, and which trees should be removed (Please review the attached excerpt ). The Pl in D.iviaion i. hereby . requiring that the the subdivision and that appropriate Tree Removal be performed its be applied c for to remove trees which are found y ig free to to be �,�]�e:L to fall during a wind storm. Please feel contact me concerning this informati.on Mark Roberts Assistant Planner • 1M25 Sw H .0: 23390 . CONCLUSION AND DE ION The , concludes that the eroposed subdivision will promote general waive of the (Sty, and will not be sigxncantl de 'trimesritall nor injurious to surrounding and atoms, provided deve/opment that demurs afta this decision complies with applicable load, state, andf' law. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein„ and ; naerp ratting the Staff Repeat and outer Itzports of affected agencies and public any -' d cedillas received in this Q the e Hearings Officer hereby approves SUB 924107 , de% Estates), subject t to the conditions of approval Recommended in the July 1,} 1992 Staff Report, with the following imen 1. follows: . ' first of Condition 19► hereby aureINeddd Ito as 19. Any tree val or relocation on this property must be appry od by the Ma ng Division thaw appnwal of a try remote per: raid amoval of the gradiag plan. Metz over 'six inches in di.ameter shall be removed only as necessary to construct street„ utthtes, and residences or as otherwise rxei9itted by r CDC Section 18e150e030A(1) through (6). The Planning Division u that applicant provide for zitherist to x mew the plans fo anti tree protection and to recommend which trees should be preserved or removed and how trees to be preserved should . be protected during construction. 2. A new condition 21 is hereby iiuposed to` read as follows: 21. The : uplicint shall mdify the preiitni ary plat to provide a ' 1-foot wide tract along the south edge of proposed SW Lady Mar Drive where it abuts Lots 1 through 3 in the Hoodview #21iibdivision Wirth of the site. The applicant shall bead a sight-obsaning bend within the tract fisim the cast edge of the sight distance triangle at 100t Avenue o this west edge of the Ownership of the tr 17 be vested in a homeowners assotiation which shodl be empowered d funded naaintain the fence, The applicant shall submit the articles of > pora ®r bylaws for the homeowners t, sociation. Owner of a lot in thet subdivision shall be requhed to be a mamba of the homeowners association and to pay fees deemed necessary by the tion to maintain the fence. 3. A new condition 22 is hereby imposed to read as follows: . subdivision , e` y p in pl , provided id first st phase shall consist of the east n ' else su i ion, and the phase Containing 103rd Avenue shall not platted until he phase(s) containing dre east-west street from 103rd Avenue to 100th Avenue has been plated. The intent of this condition is to ensure that there is an improved right of way on 103r Avenue to 100th Avenue before or when 103rd Avenue is built. 4. A new condition 23 is her by imposed to Mad as follows: 23. The app . s tdap provide ri osa y, turn-around at the end of proposed SW I.. fady Marion Drive if a temporary ead end in excess of 150 feet is . Temporary ublic access maw-Jigs) shall be, r i,lovidd for the nun-around .. ... Page SUR 924007 (Marian 16:5tates) :+u `!"„�.�'" w uP �V�.wN n $r� ` 'yLp aa.,, y w•i,,.. Wfl Sits°'° to 06 being reicorOed. 'Zikeitang,iten, COur4 the apPliaalit, chati. p-;,10iriode a l 1N itittOttOzatr.4 •, I sitillEtoPe COO 10#0= of etaissintOnOitst 114 440 011te a ti u 1► t may .haire the 010A40,xticarded after the pobli0 imprmvements 'have been afteitted he Cite of Tigard and has . 'panted the orfpOpriate,:1441thtegisfilocio Bond. 9. 1WAy tree removal or relocation on rthi * 'tt,. y s ,a0r,roved by Ow Planning, .DiFLs tort through approval of a tree nc a1 peruiit and approval eat the grading plan. Trees over s f r r in dL Shall remoVed only as n ;Gary to censtrudt streets4 ut Hotta n a and r lde a e Division may require that the applicant Ov for arborist to review the plate for grad1 iAg and tOte, .1bIteettioitk. The' alvtiCallt shall vteat thorae',trees, whitah. 413 to be preserved by y marking '4 d f the toOtlinee, a Ysµ t V- . I ,�qeMW t r 0 �`0o�e�lr' itlew , a pl as k ®� arborist or ar -e. patyieettirdt Measnres for treat; to ` ko, retaned, to the Site. A m' 6,f the tree rrral loot and Approved gra.disiig plan shall .00 atiallable during remoVal and grad: activities. S " mom'o 'le Y Offe planning Divislion, 20. ,pliant Shall provi i. for cOntinuous &let..la water f!italtbara &W ei deVelopeent to a2,1 rovilei. serVed the evicting water line on the ite. a I: a�� 11 Provide t the Tigard Water District had approVed Of �a ,applicant q � �1°i� �e�+�' c�s].yiag with .'.® Condition prior to �s Const.rmotion aatLvit. ea on thitt 'tat o. GUADIVISZON APPROVAL MALL BR VALID ONLY IV TVS FINAL Is Itscomp wrzEIN EXG a44a MIMS OF TEE PJFFECTIVR DATE OTC TB /S DECISION. DEUIONTE DRIVE RESIDENTS 10450 SW Del Monte Drive Tigard, Oregon 97224 * ** MEMORANDUM ** * ** Date p 3'anuary 31, 1994 To « List From M Bohlrnan, Bisbee, Stearns, Alien Subject « Falling Trees Recently a large fir tree from the Marion Instates lots fell on i damaged the the properties es of the �o�n�EatateadandQBs�hlrnan /B�abeeaprop ®rti.es fence dividing the Mar (which has not been repaired at this date) and the fence along the Bohlman/Bi,: bee border. Imm diateiy previous to the falling of the tree, Andrew Bisbee was In his back yard and missed serious bodily ham More recently a second tree has fallen (unplanned) in Lot, #18 of the Marion Estates. This tree 'r ell away from our property and did not reach onto Lady Marion Drive. We the that reside along �YohlBt'�L�'1 /Bad Viewing �'1�i rem'�;i.nin� trees �' theatre cman /Bnsbee/Stear ns/A1len border with Marion Estates, there are eight to ten which are leaning precariously in one direction or another or are isolated and sugoepti.ble to the next strong wind and are candidates for immediate removal, if not sooner Recent discussions with Mark Robert of the Tigard City Planning Department indicate that a filed arborist study of the trees in the Marion Est ,,tes was a prerequisite to building an ; r with o, su h'F study has been improvements of this pr ©party. To ate no After discussions with several builders and Planers, it filed. s e that when a rave of t is common knowledge � trees is changed or altered by selective cutting of trees in the grow, the remaining traes are exposed to elements of Windt, rain p construction work. These trees have oever been exposed to t e a elements and ,i. IJr r blown d� This not only many of _ a�n��rs � on D down,, consequently t�rar them fa. is a hazard to the property o � e1mont but to the Present owners and future owners of proparties in Marion Estates. That to do? We encourage Marion Estates to file the 'irequired arborist report, we encourage Marion Estate8 to remo )o trees which are a hazard to our property both personal ` and phYs.tal to their own properties. What about trees on the Delmonte properties whivh are now ecpol ed due to alt Gratz ons and cuttings in the Marion Estates? perhaps the arbo r ist report will ;oe of assistance with this situation, ail: this letter is written in the spirit of community well being a � V suffered i ae.z,ta : �/� �ge$ and P�e�,n� and safetY. However, we have �alroaa� e amp it these damages. There is still �. the P Ss �. costs to repair members ersonal damage to children, pets, and other Further damage from trees residing in Marion Estates cannot be considered "Acts of God". In iddition there is a case of nagligenee n We will take the Q, cessary ateps to assure �that • the urden ,of costs from legal requ�reme��tits have been met and Wirers � o e M.1 damages is the responsibility �,�.y c�f the Marion Bisbee i�:. ee.. Stearns Pete Ktsy k tekin Humes (Developer 950Q >W 15th Avenue i oaver ton , OR 97005 503/624 -1999 JaY 'Ross (14 8555 SW Seminole Tualatin, OR 97062 503/692 -3391 Brook Park Homes (16 9 18 ) 11080 SW Allen Blvd. Suite 600 Beaverton, OR 97005 583/643 -9417 Westside construction (17) P. O. Box 19054 Portland, OR 97280 503/777-8085 Don Blcmdah . States V. 0 Box 21.00 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 503/684-4314 Psat1 Rill,t' Farmer "s Insurance 7125 SW Hampton Suite Tigard OR 97223 503/60 - 1670 Ferd'Wardira p. O BoX 310 Newberg, OR 97132 503/628 -1961 BEFORE TER LAND USE INOS OFFI R FOR TID.. CI ",LV OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an ap ova by Ford Wardtn an o,f ap�.roxim tely� 7.75 acres of g ®� subdivision ?� '�3g�r�9, land at 15085 SW 100th Avenue in the City og Oregon. sTr REPORT SUB 92 -0007 MARION ESTATES I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST CAS$$ Subdivision SUB 92 -0007 Marion EStates Subdiviaia n. S U M M A R Y : Tie �:pplcant re�eate Subdivision °e1 imin plat aPprava3 to divide 7.75 Aare, three parcel site ilisto twenty- three 3®ta ranging in size between 10,057 and 16,488 square feet. �divri, M A.0n is proposed to be developed in two of r The eub , +gin � � ®a� thirteen and ten lots APPLI T 3 Ford Nordin P404 Box 310 Newberg, OR 97132 Same Harris MaMonagle Assoc. (8L11 $ cMonagle) 12555 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WASIGNATIO '" ` t Low 0e witty Residential unite/ ,a re) ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5 (n aidential, 3.5 15085 C�31 Tax ��t0' 14®Oo LOCATION: SW 100th Avenue (W M 231 11 APPLICABLE LP ;// C®rsmdn ity Development + ent Code bhe t ete 3.8 a 4i / 16.38, 10.92o 18.102 0 18u 144 r la . � 5C, $� b 160, 10.1�4 � and Congehens ive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1® Flan Transportation 751.2® 7.3.�.s 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8'l.ld and 8.1.3; Comprehensive Plan Map. STAFF Approval subject to eonditiC►�n0STAFF M�LATION g II • FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND STARROt a ING A. ite�aiEe any h . cre . « s t a ng 1y re cur , Tax lot 1400 contains 0 9 8 acres , 1501 contains a . �2 a Tam ;C4o�, � b�a�tt�;6� 100th Ave ei�'� d 3.125.5 rest #�n shape with 163 feet o� frontage in depth east to weer « Site locate: The site is located on the west side of SW iTlch Av :;nue, egproa$in$•ete1y 50 feat north of the intersection of sW 100th and SW Settler Street. The site can also be said to be located south of th , fully developed DeiMo &nte #2 subdivision (SW 103rd Avenue is stubbed into the nortther boundary of tax lot 1500) and north of the fully developed dV i subdivision. Ex .at incx and structures: Tax lot 1501 presently coat -° ins a single family re idence and a v ral outbuildings in the a?p oximate center of the parcel, south of the and of SW 103rd Avenue. The eastern portion of tax lot 1501 contaiiu an open field with a few mature deciduous trees of various icy es around the perimeter of this fiold. The western portion o:,d tax 1't 1501 and ,111. l o tax lot 1500 ax covered with a great number of m:.tu1 a deciduous and evergreen trees, , Tax lot 1400 is a1a o covered 1by r tvre tre w s ned also contain a single family residence. Ti e site is served lav grt.Waal driveways from both ,SW 100th Avenue and SW 1O3ud Avenue,a D. To»escrrPh;Y. din, arae s The site sl.ipes south and east from a high Point of 396 feet in the northwest corn -r of the site to a low elevation of 288 feet in the southeastern corner of the site. There aro no diatinct-drainageways on t1he trite E. ly3.aan _desi.anat,i.cnl ng goi The site and adjoins• kg properties in all direoUons are designated Low Density Residential on the Compmhensive plan Map and are zoned R..3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units /acre) . P. Sours n isi Liand uae t Properties to the south, east, and north contain single famit; residences or relatively large lots. Paaarcols to the west are undevelcpeii and are heavily wooded. G. ?. Q2 sed ,us x The applicant p r p os c� to c?��i de � ne ite into twe nt y �ch ree iota ra gi g in site from 10, 057 J 16, 488 advert!' foot as illtstroted can the . preliminary platw The • lets are £ntendpi a for dingle family ran ►side xatLaal, use nosh of the exLstipg hotees on the fate are to zetaiaada Hj[,� Public lxeiztri es an0 utilities: E]56 ms+v ..:�s�r�tir.riwoa+s�..w..�e...�w The preliminary inary utl l.:ty plan propoaea that the subdivision be served by y Avenue through the site withinithe proposed stied to The eanit ; 100th .s er ' has �iaitend6d to the sub. rn1 ivisiona s northern and pOuerern bo4gitti1tike Ah ekistin+rl ®tom sewer on the . .iatie Wouid be VetiellY ;re laoad hit a '116 0' storm ltawar. network latOOXY +ithLn the proposed atf.et ,ttun 6 Thin stoi Qiowti.toould HEARING8 OFFICER St B 92 -0007 MARION BSTA. E0 PGB 2 it as connect to an existing storm sewer in SW 100th Avenue. Water service vice would be extended through a sew water line in the proposed streets replacing an existing :;pine on the property streets and aeces The site has 163 ` feet of frontage along SW 100th Avenue. SW 100th Avenue ia functionally classified as cal street. SW 10,/th Avenue along the subleGn � � t � � 20 feet of r>1.ght -of-way:. width from centerline and approa merely 12 feet of Pavement frrm eenterlif but no sidewalk, curbs, or , tor! drains. The praal:alivary subdivision plat rotes a 6 foot right- of-w; y d dication is intended along the oil '0's SW 100th Avenue frontage. a g e Half -street improvements are also gr oposed o The subdivision would ',*wol ve the cm w aSion of a local street extending westward approximately .2.400 feet westward gram SW 100th Avenue with a short ' north- south cornet ' Lon between this street and the current southern stub of SW 103rd 76.`enuee is enet ®west stye' t is tentatively 3W Lady Marion Drly &�„ . typical street section on the r�a�atei�, The t ical preliminary plat indicates thst this street and the con ac•bion to SW 103rd arse intended to b , constrict d to full local street standards. SW Lady Marion Drive mould be satubb = d at the western edge of the site so that it may be extended in the future tc serve future development. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDs A. itw RIMR silt , e • R-3.5 the 1. Chapter 18.48 coa�t�si,n ®standards sal unit is a t use in Ah® gone. family detached residential permitted Detached single- family residential .dential lots in the zone must comply with the following dimensional req Lr ntsa Minimum lot size Average minimum lot, Width Front setback Garage setback. Interior lot side / etbact; Corner yard estbas k Rees setback Maximum building height 10,000 square feet 6S feet 20 fist 20 feet 5 feet 20 f•:et 15 feet 30 feet Chapter 18.88 contains solar h ccesed standards= ror new residential development. A lot meets the basic solar access lot Standard if - on of 90 feet or more tribe d affront it hag a nosh Boutin dnsi lot line that is oriented within 30 degr =es Of - toedt eelso snbdlviei' °n complies with th basic, requirement if S0 or more of thG newly created lots meet or exceed this standard. chapter 18.92 contain� standards for deSaity. T of ° - he ��antcalb�r dwelling units permitted is based land she net development area, �g P excluding sensitive land areal an la iedi.cated for pudic reels HEARINGS 0FF'nCER SOB 92 -0007 - HARION RsTATigs PAGE 3 a "i*� f�`,!3ti3��.n'll�? the number of or parks, or for private roadways. �:: lots, d3.va� • de the net development area ''off„ the uiunimu parcel size permitted by the zoning , ." iatr tet . • chapter, 18.102 contains _ standardS for clear vision road�ra�yidzs�iva�way ®wallls�,r�ay ,inters ®et above vlsual art, ',�atmit ead between 3 and deb na�3 � on that type and size of r!-34,0n cl, a rance triangle, po 9 a oSaway. in ,�a streets ha lP ter 18.108 contains access = tandards�. Turnaround ere required for dean end or temporary dead and. of 150 feet in length. • Chapter 18.144 permits a i aximin size for accessory tructuUres on c are acetzp, rem parcels smaller than 2.5 acres of 528 square and -.lbws foot setback from side and rear pro �y .. e maximum accessory structure height of � 5 f t . Chapter 18.150 requites a perMi and c,ontaiao .standards for a. removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or mortt in d iameter four feet above tho ground ou undeveloped . 140d. A it for tree removal musses .comply with the following oriteriat a . The trees are diseased, p resent danger to p r operty, or interfere with utility service or.tra ffio eafet ya h. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reazzimable manner; ce The trees awe not ne °-°ded to p ^event eroeion, instability, or drainage Problems d. The trees are not to needed protect na +arby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade nd open space; The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually . adversely affected by # and a the tree remes�r'a►L ' � any', d New vegetation planted by the app will � applicant ioan�,• , trees to be cut. replace the aesthetic value of 5 • Chapter 18.160 contains titan darin for subdivision of parcels into o 4 or more lots To be approved, a preliminary plat must oo9 P i with the following criteria* Th® ro sal set "® Comprehensive Plant � � oa�a�ply with the pity . . e and the applicable zoning ordinance and other applicable ordinances and ttegUlatianap �. The proposed spat p►ld�i name must not be dupli.ca� tton and moat othc�a�a3.s satisfy the proviesione of OUS Ohapter 92; ; �'I+ IC - SUB 92 -0007 IdN ESTATES • c e The - streets and roads must be laid out eo as to conform to the plats of subdivisions and maps of partitions or subdivisions already approved for adjoining property as to width, general direction r nd in all other respects unless the City determines it is in the public interest to mcliey the sheet or road pattern ... • Chapter 18.164 cant ., iilaa Otaniarda for streets and utilities. a. sectie 13.'164.030(A) izee treats within and adjoining r�iq'� a development to be dedicated and improved based on the ci.ass fication of the street. • Section 18.164.030(B) requires a local street to have a minimum 60 -foot right-of-way and 34 f set p ved e betwe h curbs and sidewalks. °� states that where neces a to (live c. Section �.�m�.fr4 «d��i(d. � access or permit a satisfactory future division of j land, y h deed to the boundary d ar+ini la..� streets ®�aaab9. be even >< line of the tract to be subdivided., 1i► addition, a reserve " ,� a dicated strip and barricade are uire at the end of a �10 street that can be extended • eation 18.164.030( requires local street grades of 12% ore lees. e. Section 18.',64.060 prohibits lot depth from being more than 2i times the lot width, requires at least 266 feet of lot frontage a on a street other than an alley, and d3.ecow rages the creation of through lots f a Section 18. 164.070 requires sidewalks adjoining inia g all locaq IMO idential streets. seat ion ',8 « 164.090 requires Sanitary sewer service -T. h. ssct . oa 18« 64. 100 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements drainage facilities@ B. ap.22141.,pable coviprehentAm2kaiLma_41024. city :hat ci titen�e will be �o1ic� � ®1 a 1 pa�aviciee t, will assure tae �.� p pp .. Y t phaeee of the o cartu�ni.�,. tea partic� at�a i� �i3:1 � � plaanniuv and development eseri,ew p 2 2 vc�.op tent Within. the V i and Urbana Policy � � ,� . �. provide ®, p j area cO ayll *with d l i eaabie ftlattitalo OtatO and regim al water quality etandarda. 3 w po ; idly 7, i. " + io , ..w • - � �rrovic�es the pity will r`e G�'aae a� a Condition of as er# and eta:►, drainagi de ii.r . e�nt approval that p�b1.ic watery _�;�..�� will be provided and Aleoi....ned to city el-�.e.4ded� and ti:l3,ti.00 t� pl,aeed underground. zt1NGS o?r'TcER SUB 92-0007 - f lS PAM ll� %1� �s TA EMEMOMMEMEMEMOMMIGMMME - Policy 7.3.1 provides the City will coordinate water services with water districts. 5 Policy 7.4.4 requires all :lea developmer:t to be connected approved sanitary sewer system. 6. Policy 8.1.1 provided the City will, plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current, needs and anticipated future growth and d'avelopment. Policy 8.1.3 pcovidets the City will require as a preconditio '. of approval that: a Development abut dedicated 'treat or have other: adequate access; b. Street right-of-way shall be dr d,lca ,ea were the street is substandard in width; c. The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs and sidewalks to City standards within the deve:t.opmott d. The developer shall participate in the impro.rement of �° n existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; Street improvements shall b m. de aid street signs or signals wall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard 8. The Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map calls for an east -west local street connection from SW 100th Avanme t SW Settler Street Avenue with. an inters ection with 100th Avenue either atSettreet or at a point at least 100 feet (center -i a to centerline) from the eriat .ng Settler Street intersection ( See Note 9 ` on Comprehensive Transportation Map) . IV. NPO & ,AGENCY COMMENTS The City f T .gard Building ,)ivieion has commented that a des rlitiO p demolition or Moving Of the existing permit swot be obtained prior to cla structusca o the �c ite. ,r,x., additions the Building Division has Cemented that private s1 /4orm ►11 aims and eataaments should be required for lot 9 anti for lots 11-19. 11'rho existing homes should be required to connect to the sanitary aewev eys. em. Existing septic systems should be properly removed. Tigard Scho ol District 23 J has reviewed the p aL and has noted that the ?roposed devel o p ant lies within the attendance area's of Templeton lementart' School,, Twality Middle Echooi, and the Tigard Senior High HEARINGS OFPICER - SUB 92 -OW' MARION C'e et School The proposed development is projected to generate the following additional enrollment at those schoo .sii: 1 students at Templeton Elementary School; 3 students at Twality Middle School; and 2 students at. Tigard High School. The School District notes that school capacities are pro ect ed to be eAceeded as a result of this proposed development and other recently reviewed and approved developments within thoa,:e attendance areas. The District notes that core f e,cilities of the echoole are insufficient to be able to consider portable classroom additions. Additional school capacity may be provided by other options under consideration by the school district, including: grade level ci boundary a jus# nts, double reconfiguration, g ®schaul ., - a�+c� hool year, bounds g g facilities, future bond measures shifting, busing to under-utilized facile. leading to construction } housing of new facilities and other school options. 3. The Tigard. Water District hts no objection,d to the proposed development but has commented that the existing six inch water main through the site must be kept in service throughout development of the cite so aS to serve the existing homes aloe ►G SW Hoodview Drive to the south of the development. Final water service plans for the development OM need to be approved by both the Water District and Fire District. The City of Tigard PtY, lie Works Department; POE, Northwest Natural Gas, -.. and the Metropolitan Area a;om ►unicatiOns Commission have revieWed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. The applicant should contact these utility providers regarding. rcirg• their, requirements and fees for utility installation. a. Letters have be e � r ®cei� ad from �,inda �ohannson, Pebeccc Xset y, and Helen Ste;faert all residents oft., SW 103rd Avenue north of the site raising concerns with the potential traffto impacts upon their neighborhood _ connected to SW Lady Marion Dr Ive as proposed. Their letters are attached to the staff report. prop+ V. EVALUATION CO REQUEST A c o Nano® witri Coe unity a anent. qe e. • 4he proposed eubdi tide stag derds of the to E triet Code Chapter 18 mtril' i�rision coe� lies with �°' ti sac . �8 auee the lotta are • intended to be used. for eingie family detached dwelling uitaite, g 3 niag di The 100051 to 16 p .. .., ate' cones dtont with the Y �8d3 square foot lot® r .. d0 �agtare toot �oinirai� i��etr D�asi ®yang' reiaislenc �? the 10. nt of aiSe of the tone ttia and miinit�um � �,'� kava3�age let width re ire � "' ... setback ®tai�dara�le ?� cc:ne ste ... c��,th mini .. the outbuilding ou g nt �n recording of the plat, with the exce of rrie u pon 9 g o hie ateaddlin�-. the proposed lot .2/1ei h ;- f-�wat b :undarr. y g � d prior tO recot4iing the pleat i stiuctare �ri:l need to � remove �. rr l.; ��e�s ��lculatis�n Pro used tote 7 -10 are ' 'excluded frog Ott 3oiata, -yc the percent of lots that need not be conoidered withal the as �Ihe Zip VEitRIALS cis` Idg u 92 -0001 -- MARION ESTATES isms I lar • solar access calculation. All other proposed lots meet thz basic solar access. _requitement because these lots have a front lot line that is within 30 degrees of true north-south and a minimum north south dimension of 90 feet. Therefore, more than the required 80 percent of the proposed lots meet the basic ' solar design standard of Code Chapter 18r88. • The proposed subdivision complies with the density standards of Chapter 18.92 because the approximately 263,190 square foot net developable area of the site i after deduction® for right-of-way dedication) yields an opportunity for 263 dwelling units under the R -3.5 zoning designation. Twenty -three angle family residential lots are proposed. e • kdegd ate clear vision ubuld appear to e%3. ®t at all proposed interatictiona condistont with the standards of Chapter 18.102, with the passible exception of the isnor►;:hweat corner of SW 100th and SW Lady Marion Drive. The filbert tree to the north of this interaeotion May need to be reMOVed or trimmed to provide the required clear vision area. 5 In order to be conaintent with Chapter 18.108.070.C, approval of the preliminary subdivision plat should be conditioned upon the provision of a temporary turnaroiund at the end of SW Lady Marion pm s Birv® with development of ;Amide , trio, unless this street 3. extended further to' ` the wa►st at that time. 6. The existing garage that would be on lot 7 would meet the 5 foot, side yard betback and smaximut access wor•,t attneture size and height. dtandards' of chapter 18.144 7. Chapter 15.150 requires that the number of treed over nix inches in dialeter that are remotred during the Course of donetructivn be ' minianiaed. she Ski 106th Aver sue frontage of the site 'contains a nuMbe3r of spruce P� cedar treed that will need' to be removed in �� Order to ccnatr`act needed Street ivrovernente. your filbert trees further ira from S9 ' 100th -Avenue 26640 also heed to he removed to grade tb,e site appropriately ; to oonsstuet these street iMproVemstittte. Ill addition, development of the Streeata a phase Otte Will also require treed te 4 bd re,ovtard, 'pr3.ttiarily between _lots • and 10 and between tote 5' and .134 It appeate that a !or the teat part, most of the other existing treoa On the IOUs in phase one will be able to be retained. Significantly more trees will hoed to be removed in phase t tti to was itruct the ptopossed road and to IOWWAte hen on tine Zeta' it % ose not appear that fie: n ce naldi be done to tar to relocating k e street or lot lined in Order tO same . additional trees although the developer its encouraged to ccneidet this l,an "fine tithing" thie. plan prior to final plat reoordingo Rote ration of as many of the mature tr i*.t:i neiblea d11 add greatly to the atmosphere of this develekiizie, neighherher.td. kb tree k t►6val site grading Shenld be a3 1 ®wed to. Decor prior to Planning bivigiett review, and approval of a tree teaks-Via p..Lt. thet w it w. y( 41.�.v, p hvide tno dervice0: of W�. ��l iM an� �- �•:`J%�. r�wa �.P •i. �.: �. 'L�J.i��0.�d �� J4d�� arborict in aseeaissing the tree retrieval and egrading nPS in'. the taxNv SUER 92 -0007 :. MARION ESTATES 6 ,',Interest 'Of prescribing' protective >a q�eiares ,far exist g tee to. amp soyed during oonetruct ion- . on , f0 . ',;ite a gym. The proposed subdivision is 'c neiratent with the : re c uitementa of Chapter ' 18.160 ,because: aan.. The ' propodt4 subdivision complies with the Comp: ehen &3.ve ,. plan Nap's Low Density, Residential, designation's density opportunity', for the ` site air well .as with the applicablo plan policies, the r4. gulatione of the R -3 • r r° , Bone, , and other applicable re«pulaticn ; The proposed nab of the subdivision, Marion Estates, . frIt not duplictativc 'af any other ' plat recorded wa i aigagto� • County; i SW Lady Marion Drive ' : d the ortension of SW '1®3rd `itveii,ua will: provide for adequate and . safe ao�da®s to the lote in ., the proposed sui ivi® orb. These. stteete will ' be required to be, teproved to local attest standards..,, The pros i .es off` thin streets ' on *he, pre .$ inary 'plat i.ndicat eppropriat improvements.' The roq ''fired right -of -way dedication aria improvos ente to. the i tio'"s ., ail .l.13014i , kietth® fvontage $t1I inprova traffic safety .along this stretch of this existing' street.' 0w tady ?arian Drive wourld be, .,provided as a' 'local street. ! .ca�nu►ieteatiin the c.3.root.v o Note. if the Tranaportatian ° p1an, °';dap'. 'the 101 foot ,Centerliarle to,. centerline separation of the intarieioinca Of' this SAW SW tattler Street 41.t9 „SW i i a�ilso consistent wigs Note •CO • a r�Lrectitres SW Lady MariOn Dr .ve La ppapoaed to ' ab+nt thre aoi t boundary:' of the site for :appate 4 ate y �� fet t . ph rat' .00th Altehue bete f,l0H curving , n rthwaa ;d to bisect,,'the western haaalf of the eited,. Staaft aiu sta'o i ! tine', a�ppli o :” e engineer .�. lC fona g e, egardi �, .shy fine mac?, proposed to border: the aoutlherfl hi inlrndary:, o oaueL.n this set a intet editcan With 1gQ atr � ih t�r�,�re relativel olti��e to CVO 1t3 ler `iintexae t .on , eii ' to 2aa~esu t Y n ere, ' i�tln Satit versa lOte the , Mew view rnbdLvisrion t the erouth to> & )* frontage ots M . 1� "Affil Mgle l i�C .�31' �+ 1st $ be a peveraaal : eanbnsa for thin 'proposed iocata. a Thn aaippla,c int tt endE ,to a�etaairi hne ' . ta, i.ot ®1 p?a��ag they road n tihern 'boundary mould . ' ` rec, ira relocation of the ,f'toiutae. prii,pe os ►etR to., the north Vie!', neerested in °r�` i ctn bias,. ;dx31 e3 vlai thn a orrn� ((+ec�c{io r' to ` hsd�1 Masco excair t- 34:a.'` fo7 as pub .a.ic otr et , $ IA« would have pvs�d i.ha , ex; • several feet ?higher than the Paralleling public road . and would 'result in a driveway , too oboe to the intersaCtiOn of SW L dy► Marion Drive and SW 100th. .,.� Construction of a ',toad along the ncrthern boundary would reguixe the removal of a ,row of mature deciduous trees located approximately 20 to 2" feet . from the northern boundary of the Bite Northwest to southeast fall across lots 1 through 6, either as proposed or shifted to the south, would range pp y f the feet.. Because of this fall and the depth o� t.t�A+ a sanity and storm seW re in SWW 100th, it would not be poea.nible` to serve these lots without back lot sewers, contrary to City of Tigard preferred practicer. In additi.cn, the proposed location bt the sanitary sewer ,bong the southern portion of the site will malce, it possible for abutting lots in HoAview subdivision t,o connect to this sewer. Thee pl'rcels are prese3ntlar either served by septic tanki or are undo` re iOped or tderd veloped and would not be ab 14:1) to be served by new septic systems. The rod .red dOVelo ent is not antioi. e;`* t result in unsafe or overboaded� , conditi, hs on , adjoining exieti p� � � p ng street! , although residents of these areas are understandably concern +d with possible inoroased traffic on these streets. Staff has received several, corn ents from reaidento along SW 103rd to the north Who have urged that the City not allow for the connection between this existing cting and SW Lady Marion Drive. Staff, however, rep commends that this street oonnea tion be yes wired as proposed in order to develop Brea` t r interconnnectedness of t, .. g.. y de. sac streets And n ®�. hbaarhoc�os d 7fhe ab ®enc�e• � indicated that bulb at the southern end of SW 103rd AveALI this street wan developed w tth ah intent f r this etree't to be extended The City planning CoriAmi Ssiono. and Bearings Officer, in prier devvelopment deci ®ionic have all for greater interronnectedn €ens of atreatn for season® of emergency vehicle aCcs3sp traffic circulation, and improved pedestrian circulation. Neighborhood planning aloe �rrg3�t�iL�ata'�on #6 had Promoted greater 'interconnectedness Of streets in the x evie v Of ether development applications. The Co� y o pment Code • nit. ��vel � promotes .its, a onnottedness bar limit ng the aeaatc3ufiun length of rmap,en1 deed end streets to • 40d feet (Cote Section 4 ..i g ,ff ... u ehti.n the ma�ci.�ttan , .. ratti:i�ted i e.ngtl� cif 1�6� bloc to�AI200 fee�{t . dode $ectioin lb ) . ��iL�e7�CeR1i�� Ra q /�,/� ,y. } street connection is net permitted as Proposed gbh® eubeaVidititi wou■ exceed the '1200 foot maiti mom 11 c po lf • w . . ad end ,,r i�, a tie length, and at least tee rar'� � would result street tore that theiN timee� the maut u allowable length for a rea d end street eta kt understands the t ei0hhers conoerhe that thLt sty �, ei connection likely wl]. result in nEiutINGS OPVICB , ySOS 92.000/ M 3 iN ESTATES ?Adz id o an increase in traf t' Lz on the', street '.co the north taut wa find that the a acre a ig eif is;aat gubl a.c 4urpotgeat0,. be nerved by providing,' third coinneati. ,U. The altern. tillre proposed by the n ighbore on 103rd of not providing thin connection: would cult' a 40011 io re ,traffic for ,anothor neighborhood # the 100th Avseniu neighbor bood. Otaf f iindP that the propoaed etratet pattern .. providec an appxopriatto g Ito. balance of icts bstween thti►ee n®i h�srho • T he proposed ®tbditiOion c ®n aiotOnc with the toquirOmooto of Chapter 18.1640 or can, be aeodif ied to be iaon+gietent with there a eguitement', becau ®ea a. Tie applicant will, be requ ;rnd to dedicate additidAal right -of- ►ay foye send imptoiterftbio BW 1O th' Avenue iroutage. of the site to 1oca. atroat-etandatda. • the applicant'C prelminary piantr for dovelopi0g internal eubditi ®ion ®itreat® axe 00116i0'&.ant with code dt an darn a for local street width, grads, and improvemafte. c. The propoeed lotm are cosieiatent with Code etanc aide for caaxi3 mUm lot depth t0- 417idth ratio and a ller lot dimeneional ntandardee . ^ reserve etri . ohs f i�aa1 plat should .iricl��,�►c �1 , 8! .iloa a�..l��'J�4Q � aCCtB® frA SO yOidlt Merton Drive to the parce to the seat e d., The a p1 ' . 1 slant for devoidping ei��zsitary aid cant � prr31l�rrinr�ryp` ine® will provsde ®toxm� ae^�era as well ae �bl3.c water 1 for adequate n00000a 'y pulbl ,c faciittiea, although Abe- applicant Will heed ttO detaiia to the 'later adequate gyrator m►eruice r�i'1;1. be D9iatrict p r Sded throughout ats conilibrutctiob for other ati r g -.. , that at Lo prw 4, o be re ocated. t�EXiatin nand WV l tub ,id faoil .tieC v�i�.l r g p ties �►i11 the p;��;�aaed devela►pme�nt. N�r>enea public faeili dice,. t deeigned r i have adequate F bs x�ii �� capacity do tier+ ..; . ,.. 'ir'ed t� ba's c oneLetent ith tbaptex 10.164 LU d i tr ! of Tigard, Design Standard Manual.epe if icatici a. doitakog a With Coi prehaneiv r P an i® becar� eta notice cf . ,,. r aaiota i®' cc�nai ®font wi+ a,. �lio�` 26101 i. the ®uh�liv, � the bll.c . � � provided og .artitatica� and t® ;I� th _y apro ui r Atha i3O �. �C . . � t,� '� on th ® i�,�re wa® td the noighrhool� ?lamming 9 ._ re of . • t�;�st a lmnd nee o site ha�i heart a a� notin► r® rty .n this vicinit of this sites. The *,o s° ®tsd With �.... g L"` application ®n 'Olio bite pelidingA 2. to order tioliel 401410 dOhdi.titana are warranted to r cIttLre the devoic per t® d®'I►01 0p an erce►ion cOntro1 `plan r;na wr3.ng p .. .. a todion cobtrc+I etandards for the Tthai at n :i vek cc�� .ia�nce with s nkhRINGg orFY R •- s 92-000/ - itARIon EstA' Es r P i1 Basin as part of the grading permit application a. nd to pay a fee in lieu of constructing an on -site water quality facility. The situ's Engineering Department advisee that the site developer be re' iulred to pay a fee in lieu of the construct tan of an on -site waver quality facility. The site is considered i asutta ble for development of an on -site facility because of its relatively small site, slope, and location in the midst of a largely developed residential area. Payment of a fee in lieu of construction of a facility is authorized by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and USA regulations in cases where it is undesirable or impractical to construct a facility. 3, This subdivision proposal complies with Policy 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend public sanitary and storm sewers and public water service throughout this subdivision and will provide for underground installation of phone, electricity, and cable television lines. Utility Linea are proposed to extend to the ' aubdivision's western bolindary to allot.: for further extension to serve possible future development. 4. The subdivision proposal complies with Policy 81.l and 8.1.3 because P improvements � within and adacent to the subdivision will be consistent wi with City of Tigard standards for local streets as described above. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECO24M NDATIO? The Planning 1D sf promote concludes that the proposed welfare of the City subdivision, iwlcn , with modifications, will. p ,» injurious will not be Significantly detrimental nor it furious to surrounding land uses, provided that development that occurs sftar this decision complies wit h applicable local st ate and( federal lawn. In recognition of the gindiSg and conclusions contained herein, and ince rpiratin g the staff report .. rn o 3 � other reports , agencies anti public testioony and exhibits received in thiamatter Staff eGend® approval of asubd dvis.ion proposal SUB 92.0001 for the proposed Marion Estat :: s eubdiviaion object to the conditions which atoll ®we THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE REQUZIIED TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PR/Olt TO ttCOPDING ©P' T PLAT WITH WASHINGTON 1. a . The final pint shall be limited toY the creation of blentyiAhiee iots. All lots Shall be fully dimensioned on the Pitt an shall; be consistent with rt 5 toning district dimensional requires nts. . plat, shall . p . y Oregon r y cr►m 1 with Ore on Rt�visaai Btatutest, Ghat { 92; city Of Tigard e final ... 9 - y � ends Chapter i8ol,eb0 sin anxd Comnsunit naeam ®lo ent c Washiagiton county standards; . � ; p the dedicat..:. � all nteCecsery nigh ohs ►, .. the for the public streets raisin anal ` ion of a' 1 l.i rc��ide' far, � audjaacieat to the plat Shall lag and HHI IWOs OFFICER - 5 J5 92 -0007 MARION ESTATE PAGE 12 c. The applicant shall submit lans, obtain City approval and provide financial aeeurance for the construction of the following public improvement s All public streets within the subdivision an ape ified in the following conditions= Li. storm, drainage inage system. 2112ee iImBrov erica shall be Aeeiat constructed in accordance rit h2 05WJA ee nts the 04=. ,. ., -The- iam22wveflneents �r►hal l be cc feted and ►Cco eed by thG j w th„ in the time frame specified in' th,.. ,public ►a ssurasa ®cantxa Gt 2. All exi sting buildings shall be removed or else shall comply with building setback requirements for the R.-3.5 zoning t upo e recording of the plat. A demolition remit shall be obtained prior to removal of any existing buildings. STAMP CONTACTS Brad Roast, Building Division (639-4171) "imams ansnunune NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHAD BE SATISFIED AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS" SHALL BE COMPLETED CR COMPLETION SHALL NE FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TWA SUBDIVISION. (Staff contact for all recommended conditions is Chris Davies of the Engineering Department; 639- 4171, unless otherwise noted) .' 3. Both existing residences shall be connected to the sanitary sewer systems prior to recording of their respective plat h completely y septic tanks shall be pumped out and the septic y P y Existing lined shall be properly capped. An inspection Shall be obtained subsequent ao system reMoval. A copy of the receipt for pumping should be prrovideed. BtAFF ilONTAcTit Brad Roast; Building Division. 4. .. y wells . ... Ppe as re ..iced by the County `Watermaeter. Evidence of the capping shall be provided to �n v„� on the site Shall be scan d Y � P Building the B Division. STAFF CONTAC;'s Brad Roast, Building' Division. Si Adequate site drainage to the public stormwater drainage sty stem a3sshall e� shall. be provided for all lots. A private atorm drain and a drainage ee provided for proposed lots 9 and 11 ®19, unless it can be i6hall be P P demonstrated how else drainage, from these lots can drain to a public storm drainage system. Easements shall be provided 'Where a private storm drain line crosses other lots. A joint maintenance agreement shall be recorded With h eaeh lot accee ® ®inv a Ce39t1teAn �:ivate storm drain line. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building biviiefon. The a licant shall be required to a the fees .. .. .. 6. pP ecpx pay �► MO established nnaer the guidelines o Inif Led .. � ... Sewerage 9... is _ and Order k�7o 91.-4'i e NoTN: Thin La a two part fee whit, h' R paid at d. 0 ant on different ti;maga The €i �p paid p . ib' 01111dh le for that portion of the ev ®lo. ne which increage the kavervicuit rces within the P ublic right-dg -w y'. The second Portion is paid at iuil l dt g psrmit , isau anct WhiCb ia for each isndividdanl 1oi . BEARINGS OFFICER SUB 9'4--0007 MARION ESTATES PACE 13 • Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement pl ins and profile . construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Jeven (7) sets of approved drawings arvA one (1) itemized construction coat eetinte, all prepared by a Professional Englineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989. As part of the public improvement plans the applicant shall apply for and r �'a "Joint " for Provide the neceeaa:�� Information to obtain a � ®n+t p ®�m:i.t fo erosion control. 10. A grading plan shall be euh flitted showing the existing and proposed contours on each " lot, including elevations tied to the top of curb • elevations as shown on the public improvemevtt plane, 11. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainagewarS without significantly impacting properties downstream. 22. Full width street improvements, including traffic control devices, mailbox clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway aprons, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary eewerB, storm ` drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities 'shall be installed within the subdivisiOn. 13. Standard half - street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along the S.W. 100th Ave. frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to loca l street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved by the Engineering Department. 14. Additional right -of -way shall be dedicated to the public along the 64 100th Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. 15. The distanoe between interraectione':a, measured from centerline to centerline, of Sattl.er and .the proposed Lady Marion Drive shall be a minimum, of 100 feet. 16 • untilr after the Engineering Department has reviewed an not cOmt�lethe Fr poE►e,c ublic i rOVe menta shat g +� p d approved the public irsprovement ► plaflr , a street opening permit Or ConatructiOf compliance agreements has been a *ecuted execaationn of a developer- engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees la . The applicant shall make an appeihteent for a pre- conottuCtiun meeting With the City of Tigard Engineering ba partzaent after approval: of the public improvement plena but before starting work ; On the Elite. The applicant, the applicant ° e engineer and contractor shall be required' to attend this meeting prior to receiving the approved plane and per®itee. HEARINGS OFl ci R ; SUB 92 -0007 - MARION ECITATES • PAGE 14 KV + • b . f t"!r Prior to the plat being `i►ecarded with. "!�'anhir c,�ton idot! my the + ppii� >ai t shall provide ' a 100 p ercemt .performanc+ ” aeeur& ace :;4:1 • letter ai commitment. As an alternaa mi,e the applicant away haves he P at acordad after the, putlie improvements have been acce?ted by the Lt and h posted the g pp r P ri��d Ma�3t trance Ac�nd, ,• , 19i Any tree removal or relocation On this property arrant ;h$ approved•. by the Planning Division . t arough approval of a tree removal wit "an ds aPPiovai o; the grading ng .plan. Trees °Vet• sir' Oaten' in des aster shall, r. l ,, he v only an necessary to construct streets. '4ti litiea, and reeidencea. ' he Planning Division May r quire that the applicant provide for an arberiat ; to 49Viest the plan! fir gradL.ng and tree prat+ction, t °hall Protect those trees which J j re , to. be preaervo by The applioa . , Marking and :fencing the rootliraes of thole treeei ,n order to protect the trees and rc ® fro» tho CiO act :vi , .e® , The, a�i� f seta �►� � Lo�ie�r��s+c ! , � applicant ° a arbori�;��t- or th+ ► planning iviaion mail; pr®ecr;ib apes al ' �a; ctect3.�re ne ►sr rea for ,treee to }ae rate, :ned ? ►that site. copy cif the truer removal permit and approved grad .ng p .an nTiall be availabia on-eite during all tree removal ° ,and arad'ing activities. ' . &T FP' w HT Ta Jerry . Offer, Planning DL faiion• • The applicant shall provide for continuou f adequate water service during site development to all 'properties served by the existing Water line on the site. The applicant shall provide , evince to the City that the Tigard Waater Dietric has approved of the applicant's plan for ciatp :y ng this condition n pr & &r to the commencement of Cite grading or other construction activities' on this site. 3IAN _;. . ✓ OP THIS . DH�IS��CEN. 'ONLY XF TIM FiNAI.. i A►'�'' XS 1t :�PEDHD Wi°PaiN AFF�£CAVA� '��j 8� 'VALID) EIGHTEEN !MONTHS OF THE EF1'EctIVE DATE DATED 1.... gt , alt af? "!r 1 '992 oS R 1 FI � SUB 92-0001 14A1tXdBN ESTATES i�; ,./..,104- ..(. , review Planner PEM®R K ,MARILYN =G. DA - MEL C VI _' it �nf A RECEIVED JUL 2 8 1993 )COMMUhttY DEVELOP" Ni" �.M MARION STATE �` • COVE: ANTS, dONDlTIONS AND RESTRICTIONS THESE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS. AND RESTRICTIONS (HEREAFThR •., FERRED TO AS t CC &R'Si) are shade this . ` y , +� t�a of MAY„ 1�� by Beacon Homes, Inc., art Oregon rporation.,. Beacon Homes„ ncE, adOpte these CC&R°S in order to insure a. ch , �tura coMpati6ility within the subdivision and to provie for �Inlon� etandardas fOr the use and ��R � shall run with the land maintenance a lots and res dcnceae Then a d shall burden each dot In MARION ESTATES subdivision under the following terms and conditions'. AlSOr 1 , oees of these CLAWS, 1� � � �r the purposes by these the term "subdivision"' shall mean all take property C R 'S. � TO1 THE PUBLIC hereinafter set forth by the THIS �►EC'I'ION is made on the date , h �. g e as 'The Declarant.` 8 To further the undersigned, hereinafter m �1`err � to a "Lot +��'' shell be t ��at person in understanding 8nd clarity of this document Lot m y ibdr� peso Iron fee title or the person or persons v,i ith a vendee 's interest Sara per b v si n on "Dwelling Unit" is used to describe, ithe ono allowable structure lot that is permitted by the loyal turisdietien to be occupied. Each of the original - . n lots is entitled tw�.nty three (23) subdivision to one vote, and' the person or _ V g • persons who are listed on the tax riles +�f Washington County shill be the voting party. WHEREAS, it is the desire of Declarant to estabiish, reserve and maintain a improvement of all „ hereinafter defined, � lots within the Property„ a� � are a �e� high standard for the irnpr iil receive the benefits of continuing enhanced in order that all owners will d � ir� value and full enjoyment of the natural vantages of the area; - Property, WHEREAS, Dec larant iarar t d .. �.. sore � to subject t the property to certain protective tec # i ve oovenants, conditions; restrictions, and benefit easements for t he of said � d its present and subsequent owners as hereinafter specified and will convey said Fro pert sub ject thereto; NOW THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares that all of said Pr operty is pveyed upon and subject to the protective covenants, �,�vense and shall be held ..end co s nts hereinafter set forth; all of hlc:.M are for one tin the ;v��e, desirability and conditions, restrictions and easements the purpose of enhancing and protec .. . attractiveness of saki Property, These protective covenants, conditions, i shall consti ute ..ants that run with the land, and restrictions and ease�r,l�nts covenants be binding woo all persons 'claiming' Under them and shall inure to the • 4 '•r ,v b" nA uc.4 L' -3Ou benefit of and be limitations upon ail MUM owners of said Property, or " a interest therein. i r, 7" y + r SECTION 1: eigsmigmimmitcu r, 1.1 Before any structure/or structures may,!! be bor skicte a ::h$n the'subdivislon, the owner or the proposed construction site 'Of comply with these CC &R'S. Failure to eo so shall be deemed a violatla�r► of the C r R` &e The Declarant or the Declarants Ei ss:gn0 dial; keep on file a list of thou names and addresses of the members of the ACC. The powers and duties of the ACC shall be transferred from the initial members to not less than three (3) lot owners ( "tie replacement ACC) within one (1) year after the, sale and closing of the last lot owned by the Declarant or its succc or in Interest. The choice of new members so appointed, ointed, and their respective. terms as hereinafter designated,' shall be made by the Initial members of the f„ eXcliusi� +e ��isor ®ipr�, The h ACC and shall be within thew ' e respective terms of the new reernbere of t' replacement ACC stall be staggered as follows: One member shall serve e ,• initial term of one (1) year, one member shell serve an initial term of two (2) years, and one lelember shall serve on initial term of three (3) years. Thereafter, the term of membership on the replacement ACC shall be for three (3) years commencing on the . g date of expiration Of the ieltial one, two and three year . appointments by the initial members of the ACC, it shall be the duty of the ACC. to perpetrate itself, by selecting replacement members, either upon the expiration of their term . r upon death or resignation. Except as otherwise provided in this Declaration, all decielons of the ACC, or its subsequent replacements, shall be upon majority vote, Any ends to L uild or have built a residence, `t .� An subdivision lot owner who ant � �, ,y permanent pool, sport court; or ar ermanent or temporary structure shall subrriit the following to The ACC 1� (a) A proposed site plan showing the location, layout, dimensions and ocnf,eua ion of the prp eed residence, structure or terpore ry.. structures, sport courts, swimming poolsi swirrening pool houses,, as well as futility connections, drainage /greding plan, finished floor elevations, building ridge heigl te, and building elevations. (b) Proposed g plan plans supporting drawings; she *in . , . �p� A prc� Qsed buildin lan ar lane a�r�d su : �tirt �_ $ ` y g k proposed sidenee including the type. o exterior and design of the r'o Deed rye the at es ..... supporting drawings, showing materials � rid, s end colors to be used sir, a plan and s r structUre Improvement including exterior ..: � . and design of posed 5tru fie style a .. the p �� or fret materials and colors to ba used (c) ..A proposed bas �dscapingia to plan with a plant material list and plant Material placement will be submitted to the ACC prior to toMteenteMent and • • f rY r pg. ,�. maybe submitted implementation �:�� the lrar�d�;ce ire Ttnts � larnds��': n�i play; �� after the start of c but must be su Cited Firer to Occupancy. e‘e re p 1.3 Within fifteen (15) days e ft er s�brni� ®� the p lane and supporting drawings described ap�r.�wl in Section 1.2 tribe "ACS, the lot owner shall be f g . , p .%, p kit information submitted is ir�rurmed in writing �s to the lar � � ao� tab � If the. ir�orrrtatl not, in the sole di �cretion of the ACC, sul noI t for it to render an opinion, the ACC shall Aso inform the lot owner wthd�ii , �'" ACC �� (7) days, specifying the additional information nteded. In ouch event, 'the fifteen (15) day period referred to in this Section 1.3 shall commence agaln after all necessary information is received by the ACC If any aspect of the plan does net conform to The ACC'S development concept for the subdivision, the lot owner shall revise and resubmit the plans until conformity with the development concept is reached and the plans ,re approved by The ACC. 1,4 if twenty (20) days after submitting all materials the ACC does not act or refuses to act than the plans shall be deemed approved. 1.5 If after receiving approval from the ACC nine (9) months shall ;pass witho ,i±s the start of +construction than the ACC approval shall automatically expire and the ACC approval will have to be reinstated. 1. standards shall include, but not be limited to such considerations as These siting, shape, e tee, color, design i o � � impairment of vies, existing terrain a p �n ids and,. y rr in nd vegetation, and any other factors that the reasonably - . in sod faith, to be relevant in furthering the i .ACC � n � high eertithe$tc standards for art a4RION ESTATES. 1./ All structures within the subdivision e, slate.., clay cement have cedar shake, cedar shingle, l l y tile or ment tale roofs, and be of double wall construction. All c , ... , i windows shear a � �. o vinyl, wood, or exterior Vinyl clad wood. Ail exteriors of all buildings el- r be un :for�nnly sited with cedeer•, redwood, en approved LP board, brick, r u deemed acceptable by The 6 �tcna, stucco or such other material � . ACC The use of a T 1 i 1/plywood t .. � _ � s a rod�r�! is prohibited.— .6 �p product N .lbited. � Cher trim and decorative materials shall be celled OW on the l irons and approved by The ACC. 1.8 i r gl e family dwelling u ni s shall, - . have a total livin. g area of not less than 2500 square feet, of perches, decks and garage, however, upon receiving a written request The ACC MO ad gst this figure doWriWard by up to ten per cent to accommodate a significant design t hat Si ll, in the sole °Onion of The ACC, enhance the aesthetic and arch tecteral value of MARION ESTATES, 1.9 After approval of the plan or plans, the lot owner May begin con struotiorr erg accordance With the plans. Construction not in donformit50 with the plans shall be deemed a violation of these C &R'Sd ••• „ . • , 1. ' , . • ,•: • rallo ti4 • 1 • 10 !ff, erpection,, The ACC believes any cronOtruction is not -41 agree.--.,ent vvith:*, Atairipiovectplans, it may halt cont Ong r,14y require that corrvi,,tfive z.dioit:belaken before construction can et.; Itinue.#Tho ACC shall not be liaL for any,darpages, delays, or inconveniences caused by its inspection, whether or notthesskinspectiond result in the discover;/ and correction of any unapproved f 1.11 In, the event of destruction by fir or other casualty to ail or part or the atriroture rebuilding shall take place within three (3) months of the event unless Its1 change from the original materials and plans Is desired. If the rebuilding of the dwelling is to deviate from the original design and materials used than th0 changes shall be, submitted to the ACC In confor,unce with the archittx:tural review process outlined in this document. 1.12 All perimeter \fencing shall be a uniforrri design of materials and application. The ACC has seletted as the startA 4rd fencing a six (6) foot cedar fence. 1.13 The ACC reserves the right to grant a variance to any of these CC&R'S when, in its reascrolAe judgmenft, such variance will not cause a significant deviation from thd subdivision's /development standards. l'inWever, any out variance must be in writing and signed by two merobers of The ACC, A VerianCe given to one lot owner does not entitle other lot owners to a similar variance. SECTiON 2: Lig NAKLQ,EEaQeraty 2A All lots in the subdivision shall be for residential use only. risio business venture she!! be conducted in or about any property in the subdivision except for: (a) Builders, temporal.), sales offices or model homes eind (b) One room offices which are not designated by exterior signs, ,,top-in or vehicular traffic, 2.2 Eth lot owner in the subdivision shall be responsible for the exteriOr mainter—Ice, repair and landscaping on hiq property consiStent with a resicien,,,,i subdivision of thia size. Wiaintenance is to be 41One in accordance with usual community standr4rds foii residential subdivitilons with lots of this site, striving to keep the natural aesthetics of the pmperty o owner shall peio4 the growth of noxious or annoying weeds on his property including the maintenance of the areas between any road or paved surface that nriay abut the owner's properoy line, 2,3 No disabled or dismantled Vehic e be kept on any Street or let in pitlic vie* for more than forty-Op:fit Ka) hours. .):;441. • .Y 2.4 No boat, motor home, mobile home, camper, trailer, or racreatl�n v shall be kept in open public vim in the subdivision Such " ,r � • vehicles store in a ' garage, or adequately creermd from publkir view, * r�.J, r r r a 1 rat " r i d ��'" r1 H 2.5 No trainer, van, bus, camper,. r," truck, tad �t,, garage, or storage structure located i, s in the subdivision shall be used as a'? resIdenceb either permanently or temporarily. 2.8 No lot shall be used or maintained as a et � r ump'ihg ground for rtAbblsi% trash, garbage, building materials, or other Objectionabfie refuse. Ali refuse shall be kept in sonitery containers and shall be ruler /'/ discarded. 2.7 NO turkeys, chickens, piggy, caws, her cos, Or sirs filar farm animals shall be on ng or-c sn norcial kennels for dogs permitted on any' parcel. No rai�iCr�, bpi shell be perri?tod on any homeowners shall insure that than animals that are kept on the pr-operty do not interfere with the normal quiet enjoyment of the other property owners: Any obnoxious or offensive activity shell require the owners remove the offending animals. 2,8 No outside antenna shall be eroded. 2.9 Solar collectors must be approved by The ACS: 2.10 No sign shall be posted on eny lot except for one si g� 01vertisiroa the property fear sale or rent. 211 Easements as shown on the subdivision plat or as otherwise recorded shot/ be preserved by the respective lot owners. Site ;nprovltments shall not be �aintenan of any ►asei rent The owner of plod so as to inter�re with the � ens net which has an easement sll maintain the ea?tir :lint at his expense, except for' improvements for which a public authority or utility is rrspQnsible: 8M 'ION 3 : , I PENN/ Lt �l . Ll tigrarfil a 1 Mete CC&Ft'S shall run with one burden each of the subdivision lots to th0 benefit of Any party who holds any right Otto tt 41orest kh any lots 3.3 Prior to the sale and doting tit all bto ' in the Subdivision k:y Dec. etrgin r " 4ts • •n.... . '°, ,._. "..: i '..y,. .. . 1 . t, successor err interest this gs�claratsor� ��a not be revoked, �ro�ided" hovr®ve g - _ the Decl4r atipn.._ may be amended by duly re4Or ding a da�ris� sand trine, c g. _ by the b clerant or its �llstrun'tent Which' ACC. ^ � rah ��iniarns an agrt�ernerrt si nod successor in ih erect, end net Lest than 60 p �srcent Of tfi o dliibers of the ACC. After the sale 4e` sing of all lots In ubdlvision liby beclarant Or itS successor in Interest, l y #hl� bie�l��rat ;gin ane be toveked only by obiainint) the • fi 1 O, FAX 524199 P; e t y q nt of not less than 80 percent of the lot owners; in addition to obtaining the AA r f of �e. -se' riot that GO percent of the members of the A Amendment of <v!.rtt ,�,; I . } to n a g We may boa ompidshe'J only � is �e�la��ti!�n rtaiic�re�t said �r�pletion and 'rp :duly rer rding an in eument which c'. tains an agreement signed by not less r�a �,.},S4 .i' , 7r 60 a t I , percent consent of an 80 peruer�t the lot owners An �ddlt�ara to obtaiF�lllg �� p. the members of the ACC. . , MY '..' ,,z it r. �,I .4 3.4 Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 3.2 and 3.3, The ACC'$ p' review pima pursdnt to Section 1 of the CURS shall expire �V9 wbl1 �mrtion o r u fulfilled it reoorarhiis plan reviews for all when Beacon ,times, Inc. has l p lots. # 34.5 Tee C1C &R'8 are enforceable by any hot. owner in the subdivision. in the event of any dispute or c ntroverey between Or�among the ACC, the Declarant, air any of the tot owners,' regarding interpretation tion. or ernforCemant of this i � � _ ig .. A matter to final and binding arbitration in ��+salara�tlt�n the matter ah�ol! be subrnotted t a reap with the races then *tinting of the 'arbitration Bevel s, +�` Pert and (°'ASP'). ASP shell be empowered er: ®d to award damages, grant injunctive or declaratory end generey do all things teat would be available in a court of law. the event of any arbitration the pronging party she'd be entitled to s � � recover ' from the losirig party, all .reasonable cast end attorney fees incurred thereby, Including those costs and fees arising in the event of an appeal. a:6 Invalidation di any one provision of t hese covenants by Judgment Of ce urt order shaiI 110 way affect any of the other covenants which shall remain In full force and effect. .3.7 Neither. the Declarant; its officers, directors, Or si larehoiders, the ACC, nor .. to r member _. :,L, claim, .. _ any _ any current or pay �arr�ber there` shall be ?liable to an owner, Occupant, tenant, ues • loss, dai�ra�g+�, CC�iSt, fees Ir1c�l4 �dl�lg . _9 I , � � or invitee, for any �r�rtti r or claimed to have been ��f�,,�red ... • ... . prejudice suffe ed im j $io f��! attorney fees) . or�� Y o o�r �r� � 4d act.. �ar�lrs�s tt is .es$a�,�1iSh+�Ci, b: dear end r any n act, . donv �cir _. .. evidence, that the anted outside of the scope of their respons bilitieti and with malice or in bad faith., SECTION 4,1 All conveyances of lots situated In the • subdivision shall bee Jec ub�eet td a! eats•. _ i ..: , r• o ded . .4...,. �er�t� d�sr.! ®sad On the acarded plat in ii9llat�iingtor, County public records, and are by this reference„ Incorpo ted herein any}' �i /qty c�ou Lady Marion bra �p a Ole %�V'!Y�1�� tract 6�71�4J1 f.. th�T lilO�'fAth edge ' �• eK'.... �Y.. V brine where it abut lr Lots 1 through 3 in the Hoedview 0 sUbdi i for i south' of .g - t structi. fig' `�� the s�to, is de� i Hated an the plat for. the ..ten irarr of a �. ��5e°ing fence i f g� �, h g , g e Within the tract Porn the past edge Of the tight �ist�rn traaro.',. Ie at. � � Amen 7 + €r y;7rr y,. •• r x4jwr q', 7.. '' .b.[} r •' '? {: . r.. y. , rq , 'e 1w y+, rj "•r' y /. IjjS t";` i'• i `` " ji '�1it i , y,+ t 'u-!. n4 ynijf wA,:, i �a , � �"�,. rf 1'i7 a 4y7{t niY•,�• 'n ' P >, . 1l}1 ,,,i.. , ''� , F/M0 to the. ��,f�!�i�t �.�', � {--'' rr4 ' 4a"� r 'K i Ifl■. ; T iiii ei igoh>lpj�j' ��t' t M ® � t� Yt� �� y��vs k." req�asred t rrisint�� Si ° + Jf al ►� 1� 7 ' „� ti �l� ef' a�tiosl ` �Sd raeisnotemnapnrt f .r.", •+ .�: ..� �� ,,,r ,,.,. ri 'n tom► i of the •�, e t 4 Y S"q uMf]`n '� ? �i,' 4 ��(i Of ? /;in y4'�Y.J:: N'iu., t,. iara;mi� ®1Obe ap, .. fiY�� , {,�rr,r�t. ,fin radtor en ,� � GC>t6nBY1� , r. 44011.005;44, n,�m " ,t,y. c lied' r ` 4,1 � atit ern:�unt„ . The ooritra ot eMount " ►, shall b,�tovvr ®d► t!�tt a ,.. „'! , that ran ' ro . giant' h shall oioilga� `.wbric d r.i�,ite” b� ��l � f t "e each et of the o�' - � a� � art as Lot �N cw - i , the b ti ! coSt per Lot e8 . • ` .. rate of one- tWertty third of Owner at a . � ;_: .., � ,, . e &R'$ shall also > ,ilow, ° consistent with the a nded approval of .., � Ladd Marlon •Driv�ifro� Lets the �ubds� $sior6 �� direr, ��rehlc�le► ao�s; tc� �� + o #� 1 through ��dd��d .1 through 3 Hoodview #2 eubdiioiskpn... The owralt a f Lo g • provide r - , prior to obtaining this direct � Tigard, a plan tO be #2 a�ebdovi�io�t+ must � �'�uidQ fc>r�' the follou�i�� r �it~:f of 1r � p vehicular access: a street opening permit from the e o a roval to the Marion Estates ACC shvwina the mod, to submitted for pp modifications the force, street curb, oidava ;alhe I$ dsoapin9, and any other reasonable , �eblaa i em Upon approval of the plan the apptticent will ' that the AOC may want addres��dp �' money sufficient to pay .pr the be required to post with the ACC an amount � _ cover the costs above modifications The money shall be an amount sUff'ii oiont to c0 of the improvements and restoration of the area consistent with the ..the rep , conditions prior to the implementation of the worn;.. The temporary access easement across lots 14 and 15 as shown shall 4,2 � he p �Vl d to the Est exist until S. W. 1..� � Fend. connected O a _ Drive �� extended ed to tho City � Tigard. 'These d t�arioh �r ,and dedicated p street that is accepted b�+. as n is for the benefit of thy, Publicb eas�rn t m herein, has hereto set In witness thereof, , „ rsi rs� ►��iral� the Declarant h MAY, , the �n +� his hand the nth day of MA Declarants Beacon Homes, Inc. State' i.... t y 0 -., : �tat,� of Oregon, County" �f t�la�hir�� ton, on hip th da... of t�l��Y- �� personally appeared A. y _ did say that he is the ... _ ��l�s �; Why being duly �'4��ii°! Signed . �.� +� „� .. or�all. a eared afar s- ci • and that paid instr�un� gas s��d in �� ►f eacon Homo , lre , Secretaryor d + f directors, and he icknow•ledged � �b �, of said Corp atiorl by authority t said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me AFFIDAVIT OF MA7 ING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington city of Tigard 1 X, x.4 .1 it _ depose and Bays (Please print) That I am a& The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC Hi APING FORS v T'ha't I dervod NOTICt OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director igard Planning Commission Tigard Hearinga Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/ Notice of Exh. pit "A ") was Mailed to each named attAhhed list marked exhibit "B" on the said notice NOTICE OF DE SXON a as her to in +d States Mail on day e f bu the Unit lletin board on the day o , Postage prepaid Decision of which - is att shed (Marked e ®howa�n on the '�aand a .t the aad�dr ,t '� `_ day of ,... att cried, was post on a a an appropriate s 0 1 ; and depo ited day of 1. 2. Name (af Name of Applicant: Same CITY OF TIGAPD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY HEARINGS OFFICER Concerning Case Number extolb A-- A• o ,weer e Fera WrarYi u, l� r,�,ir 4 - . . City ' State aIL, Zip n132 _ .., 3. Address PO Box 310 4. Address Tax Map 5. Request: Zone: Lotion: of Property: 15060 SW 100th and Lot No(e) . s 2S1 11¢ B ham 1c ,.. g� 9n 1500,...1.441_15_21 m. �, regl�l ®gt f ®s 3u�ad�. a� .eio�„��e�,,_..,,i®,►�.a�ar�r plat a a, eD r/ry�ys �Y,y�.� ,_.IX-3A.5_02q Aree cel ®3.te into d�„ 7 �d� �� ls�..p�.�.JiaoA lRU�� / • �7 1�ri ®O n u.mo�• allots r'an ina betweeltAg.a052.811nest. The eubdir�3.s�.on in pro sed _t,a bye; ��ela � n3 twao phae�, thirteen an& en lots ^ NR tRNVIR ITERT Cmmunity De�eloment Code ha r 18.88. 18.9 i8 x,54 • rehena .vie Plan 02�..144.. .,. � ,, �EiC . K <....._..�..,.,., Pollie® 2.1.1. 4.3..3.._7 „1q,2, i.3.1 i.4!` x.6.3._ 8:1.11. and 8.1.3. R-3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units /acre) The R-3.5 zoning allows single family residential unite, public support facilities, residential treatment home.. s farmingd manufactured family day accessory p, io temporary u ®es�re�Lde t lleAka rand structures among other uMe0. a._.... �. Approval as requested Approval with conditions Denial Notice was published in the newspaper posted at City Hall, 7 Notice: and trailed to: The applicant and owner (®). of record a ord within th rewired distance Z ee The affeted Neighborhood Planning �.......�., .Organization X Affected eeted c��vernmental agencies o� Decie ion z_. THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON Amt 21.• . 1992, ,_, final AN APP IS findings dings of fact, decisions and .statement of con`liticm &o can The ad ®ptec( f �.n Hall, 13125 S,�oi ,_ be obtained from the Planning Depart:TariOnt, Tigard Hall P.O. Box 23391, Tigard, i gt)n 07223. _.__�. , 1�y 7.,,s'ty t ® the � ” � A . 32 . �,�@� eoah�..+bA provides _ that a Mitten® ... .. �.._,.. with na 0 d ..s after notice ie given and arri.tten appeal may be filed w�tiaa0 days antd met p . the may be aubmi . , and Went. the appeal be accompanied a appeal fee ($315,.00) and transcript costs (varies up to a maximum of $500.00). 10. The deadline for filing of an appeal is have question®, please call the city of Tigard an,* qu Planning Department, 639- 4171. bay /S:"X92 '.... 07aH • RECI WED PLANNJNo BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGAR D, OREGON Regarding an application by Ferri Wardin for approval ) of :a preliminary plat for a 23 -lot subdivision for land ) west of SW 100th Avenue north of SW Sattler Street ) in the R-3.5 zone in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a pr Aindnary plat to divide about 735 acres into 23 lots in the R-3.5 zone (Residential, 3.5 units gross a�cre)e Pmposed hots comply with the per P�po �' y dimensional and density requirements of the zone and the solar access standa'is for new development. The site abuts SW 100th Avenue and a stub street (SW 103rd A venue). The pp proposes right of way for and to improve to City standards a new local . applicant ses to dedicate r h �► ° street (SW Lady Marion Drive) from 100th Avenue to the west edge of the site and to dedicate right of way for and to improve to City standards SW 103rd Avenue from the existing stub to the proposed new local street. The applicant proposes to develop the subdivision in two phases. Two phasing plans were proposed. In Plan A, roughly the east half of the subdivision would develop f in Plan B, roughly the west half would develop Public storm lines will serve each lot. Al. the hearing, the applicant requested the option to b build a storm water facility on the site, rather than paying a fee in lieu. A pu b hearing re gardin g the application was held on July 13,19 92. City staff =commended conditional :approval of the subdivision. The applicant accepted the Staffs' recommended conditions of approval with relatively minor changes. Eight area xesidents testified orally with objections and concerns about the development. Most of those n✓siden�, testified about existin g and future e txic p noblems in the area, F _ c larly tone on SW 103rd Avenue and on and at the intersections of Murdock Street and 100th and 109th Avenues. A number M area residents testified in writing and by petition with of other . substantially similar concerns. ns. The Hearings Officer held open the record for 7 days to receive additional written evidence. FINAL ORDER SUB 92 -0007 (Marion Estates) LOCA'11ON: West of SW 100th Avenue north of SW Sattle &wet in the City of Tim, Oregon; 15085 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 2S1 110E, Tax lots 1400,1500 and 1501 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential ZONING R-3.5 (Residential, 35 uritslgross acre) ,.. repo y gl �j`T, rented by Harris-McViona e. Assn APPLICANT OWNER: Ferd •1 a!�6�, SITE AREA: About 7.75 acres p 1 LAW: Community °� Resolution Order 918.d�S,1S:85,15.9Zp 18.102, 18.144 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164; 91-47; Com .,hensi� e.P'l AP°��C �C.A�IJI� L nnmuni Development Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 8.1.1, and . 7.1.2, 7.3.1, ��.4�rdiraacice 92-07 8.1.3; Comprehensive Plan Transportation Plan Map as amended by ° l� STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditionally a prove P HEARINGS Ok' iCER DECISION Conditionall a ppmve4 Page 1` - Hearings Officer dec s n 'IB 92- (Marion ,estates) II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Simon II of the (pity of Tiganl Staff Report dated Daily 1, 1992. 1 1. APPIICADLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The Hearings Officer incorporates by r inference the approval standards in Section III of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated July 1,1992, with the following amendment A. Resolution and Order 91-47. This resolution and order adopts the Unified Sewerage Agency's Surface Wate Management Regulations and requires all new developments that add additional imaprious surface to provide for a water quality treatment facility or to make payments in lieu thereof. lv REARM, TESTIMONY, AND NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS A. Hearing. The Hearings Officer received testimony at the public hearing about this application on July 13, 199/ A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Pro ngs), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). Thew exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. B. Surtzn wry of oral testimony. l;. City Planner. Jerry Offer and City Engineer Randy Wholly testified for the City. a. Mr. Offer summarized the staff report and recommendation. He explained ed the relationship of the site to the Transportation Plan Map, note 9 on that map and dinance 92 07. He noted Ordinance 92-07 has been appealed. to LIMA. b Mr Wholly responded to testimony about traffic o s He opined that the testimony warrants an analy sis of traffic warrants for stop gns at the intersection of 103rd Avenue and Murdock Street. He noted that stop signs are p intersection and Murdock Street. In response to a ue for a e rail a the southeast edge of sed Lady Marion have, he guard e g F�P� y said it would be considered du ring review of clammed road plan& Regarding water quality facilities, he argued against giving the applicant tk+ option of f providing an on-site facility, because small facilities are difficult to ; to 2. Bill McMonagle and John Slaughter testified for the applicant Mr. Slaughter .. testified in favor of the subdi'visioti. Mr. McMonagle accepted the conditions recommended by City staff with the following changes. ale proposed the alternative phasing plan (Plan B) he perhitte . b. He that e �t� pp�f�e�� g an on-site storm water quality facility <�st opaying a e in lieu thereof, (seta eeoin`end se condition of approval 14). Page 2 - Hearings Officer decision SUB 92 -0007 (Maroon Estates) O c. Regarding tree preservation, (see recommended condition of approval #19), he expressed concern about the open-ended nature of the condition. He proposed hiring an arborist to prepare a tree preservation plan. He further proposed that the .. building permits are prepared, same arborist participate in the planning process f� each lot as b�,,ld'� and recommend which trees should be preserved or remo `i and what conditions should be imposed to protect the remaining, trees. He d. L[ ` agreed to build a sidewalk on the south side of proposed Lady ItAarion Drive and to build a fence along the south edge of the site adjoining lots 1 through 3 in the Hoodview #2 subdivision to the south. 3. Daniel Linda Johnson, Jenny Hoch, Steve 'el Sheridan, Helen ��teyaertr Rebecca !sky, Davison, Thomas Giilihan, and Richard Barton testified against the subdivision or with concerns. a. i himself and 36 other residents of the area. Mr. Sheridan appeared on behalf of He submitted petitions signed by the pies he represents. He testified principally about traffic issues, particularly extension of SW 103rd Avenue into the site. He argued that SW iO3rd should not be extended into the site to minimize the potential for traffic throe h the Delinonte Subdivision to the north, noting that streets to the north are not designed to accommodate through traffic, and such traffic would by hazardous to pedestrians and residentu of properties adjoining roads to the north. He pointed out where dead end streets have been permitted in the past in support of this case allowing in . g such a dead end in He argued that an east -west connection Y � called for n note 9 of the Transportation Plan can be provides without connecting it to 103rd Avenue. If the City decides to extend SW 103rddAvenue irito the site, then argued stop 5 intersections in the vicinity to facilitate he ar ed sto signs should be installed at B should. not be approved, ved, be�;a�use it would require traffic m the west half of the project to use 0 Avenue until would i�qu SW Lady Marion Drive is extended to 100th Avenue. b. Most of the remaining witnesses reinforced ed Mr. Sh ' testimony. They k r! s te.� expressed concern p a-ncularl Y aboti� the lack of sidewalks on area streets and narrow street widths off -site. Mr. Gillian guested that the applicant install a guaid rail on the south side of SW Lady Dion Drive to prevent cars from sliding taw his property to the south when roads are ice covered. C. 1VPO and 'Agency Comments. . Flemings incorporates b reference the l'U and agency comments in The Hearin s CJffcer inco�vra y Sections iV of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated July 1, 1992, The NPO also « .. the recommended a p'�ivacy submittal minutes of a meeting held June 17 in which the n ,' . the a NPO i... . ni �1, gin 3 of the � south side of SW Lady Marion Drive adjoining lots 1 tlii�a� adjoining Hoodview #2 subdivision. ...... ,also concluded a vie Pik is not netted 'I'614, along the south side of that street, notwithstanding City standards. D. Written Testimony. Denais received comments Helen ,. of � hearing in this amt the and Tainnn 1. ro� ore th° ` Sheridan, der, e qty eiv►ecl Kenneth an ants from Kahn, • and Judy Hummel, Sty. serf Daniel and Rebecca � Isis an .... le letters are identical. They raise the same The itlen� Linda arguments as made by Mr. Sheridan and others at the ;searing. Y � Page 3 Hearings Officer deci.siori SUB 92-0007 (Marion Eslate4 , , : for�da s for. ucum�n of tadditi additional written Examiner held open the record testimony hearing, days ony and evidence. During that time, the Hearings Officer received one letter from 1Vl'/M Roger Haight and one memorandum from City staff. a" M/M Haight raised concern about fire safety during construction of the project. b. By memorandum dated July 21, Jerry Offer responded to the alternative phasing plans for the project. Among other things, he argued that Plan B does not comply with Community Development Plan Policy 8.1.1, because developing the west half of the project first - -- isolating the west half of the project from 100th Avenue ---• does not result in an efficient street system He noted a temporary turn- around should be required where the east -west street terminates on the site with a dead end segment more than 150 feet long. He also responded to general concerns about fire safety by noting that hydrants exist on adjoining streets. and He appeal. so provided copies of the relevant documents regarding Ordinance V. EVALUATION ION OF REQUEST A. Compliance with Community Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the findings about compliance with the Community Development Code and Comprehensive Plan in Section V of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated July 1, 1992, with the following amendments: 1. The Staff Report addresses many of the traffic issues raised during the hearing in this matter. To reitc,tiate, the Transportation Plan Map requires an east -west local street opposite 100 feet Street. Proposed SW Lady Marion Drive t north of Battler 5 f osite at at least possible on the site Connection of that street to Avenue that requirement to the extent SW 103rd ,�velite is ne�.ess to provide a efficient and inter+coronected tranaption 18.10).060A(3) and 18.164.030(f). y . y Y '' C sedan s st�-.a. Such a system is required by Plan Policy 8:1.1 and by CDC 2. Although such a system also may inmease non - resident through- traffic, the finds that the increase in traffic as a result of the connection is I�ea_��gs Officer .. g �� out-of-direction ., . negligible, given existing traffic volumes on the sheet and the travel necessary to use as a route or increase convenience destation . That . s is, the 10. rd connection n will not reduce trip lengths o significant origins and n for most the ... emergency vehicle access could be impeded, and access into and travels However, without the, connection, ,vision could be limited to one point only out of the subdivision 100th Avenue) at least until SW Lady Marion Drive is extended off -site to the ' interest allow multiple access points to the subdivision to west. It is in the public ty�te�st to facilitate the safe and effik,ient flow of traffic from and to any direction. 3. The Hearings Officer undee stends the sentiments of area residents about traffic i.p t.. in However, the concerns about which residents testified ied_ lairn�ac m the areas ever, roost of will pP?�' Y Y f proposed exist. The os�. subdivision ill not add a ciabl to the bletM about is P whrcii residents testified. The Iear ings Officer agrees with i h area residents that there re is a sthsv tna al p ublic interest in addressing .these �lens by Wetting existing derirripmved collector arterial streets, y adding s walks along most !urea streets where sidewarz do not exist, and by instilling sto p signs whew wanted: The Hearings Officer will require the applicant to address its share of the public interest Page 4 - 0 gar de'cisior Sag 92 =000 (Marima Eslaies) • va by improving streets on the site to City standards. However, the impact of the subdivision is not sufficiently great to enable the Hearings O fic(r to require the applicant to make off -site improvements given federal and state constitutional constraints on the land use process. The klearsxigs Officer also recommends that the City Engineer initiate mew of traffic warrants at intersections in the a ca and consider upgrading area streets through the public facilities plan or a lot ° al improvement district. " However, the Hearings °'liver does not have authority to require the City Engineer to undertake such steps. gin Hearings Officer encourages interested n mbein of he public to contact City a gene► lg staff and other Qty officials to advocate such steps. 4. To provide adequate maneuvering mom far emergency vehicles, the applicant should provide a texnpora r turn - around where SW Lady iVlaran Driver teminates between phases of the psoject if the dead end segment of tlfle street is more than 150 feet long. 5. The Hearings Offices concurs with Qty staff that Phasing Plan A is preferable to .Phasing Plan because Plan A makes the connection to lOOth Street in the first phase. SW 100th Avenue provides ire direct access to collector and arterial streets in the area. Therefore, Plan A results in the most efficient street system possible, and is more in keeping with Policy 8.1.1 than. Plan B. 6. 'Thee i staff recommend a condition of approval to inseg to development of the subdivision with the tree removal chapter of the CCommurity Development Code (CDC Chapter recommended i of approval #a9i Although the ; a onlicart expressed concern e that condition, Officer is consistent with CDC Cp�e r 1$• 150. The recommended coedit do allows i s gn ificant trees to "be oved ttnF as necessary to Construct streets, afifities and the ." Beatings Officer r � ognizes that the cited sentence is shorted for i ` e detailed tree .rova1 criterib' in CDC Sectiai,'e 18': 50.030A(1)-(6). To remove any doubt a. bout the mean. ng of the cited sentence, the sec :Impended condition should be amended to reference those criteria. '7 Because the applicant proposal to build ' d a sfl ht cabsGUrie�g fence at the southeast edge of the site, a condition is warranted ensuring a tract is cited an which to build the fence, the applicant builds the fence, and a homeowners association is roe ' to own and maintain the tract and fence: B. Compliance with Resoluti4m and Order 9147. The, proposed use can comply with Resolution and Carder 9147 by providing on -site surface water quality features or alternatives omitted by hiw., In this case due to the relatively small size of the subdivision, the Hearings ��. a r finds that providing an on- site stow water quality facility . is cent the p - " t bee . ��st ease such a facility would be more expensive to tame to operate �t�!µ��rg�c�yret�:; �p�. facility : : •.. • o NfN l.��6M� facility designed �,/llsJllS" iJ t® accommodate Therefore, the a water from the fee `'�: of _ �� y � �" site is only a small part:'. e sub-basin of which t�� +„ facility. �p lx Y �;� quality ere oxe, a ctuit s .o pay a ee in lieu o.� buildin an on site storfln water SITE 'VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER F The Icasings C1ficer visited t& site and SUrrounding area. Page S Hearings 0 der detester `EIB 92.0007 ,{i4tar%n Estates) et 0 01 V VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION The Hearings Officer concludes es that the proposed subdiyisi ©n will promote the general welfare of the City, and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding land uses, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal 'WV. In recognition of the finings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected Pgencies and public testis Joy and exhibits received in this matter, the Hearings Officer hereby approves SUB 92 -0001 (Marion Estates), subject to the conditions of approval recommended in the July 1, 1992 Staff Report, with the following amendments. 1. The first paragraph of Condition 19 is hereby amended to read as follows: 19. Any tree removal or relocation on this propel must be approved by the Planning Division through approval of a tree removal permit and approval of the grading plan. Trees over six inches in diameter shall Le removed only as necessary to construct street, utilities, and residences r as otherwise permitted by CDC Section 18.150.030A(1) through (6). The Planning Division require that applicant provide for an arborist to review the p l ane for grading and tree and to recernmenal which trees should be preserved or removed and how trees to be preserve 7'1 should be protected during construction. 2 A new condition 21 is hereby imposed to read as follows: 21. The applicant shall modify the preliminary plat to provide a minimum I -foot wide tract along the south edge of proposed SW Lady Milaion Drive where it abuts Lots 1 through 3 in the Hoodview #2 subdivision south of the site. The applicant shall build a sight-obscuring fence within the tract from the east edge of the sight distwice triangle at 100th Avenue to the west =.t : e of the tract. Ownership of the tract shall be vested in a homeowners association which shall be empowered and funded to maintain the fence. applicant . + i bylaws for the The a , licarat submit the articles of incorporation and �.a homeowners association. Owners of a lot in the subdivision shall be required to be a member of the homeowners association and to pay fees deemed necessary by the, association to maintain the fence. 3. A new condition ;2 is hereby imposed to read as follows: 22: . may platted p first phase shall The subrir�Vlsron ma be left .. . portion of the subdivision, •• and the phase . consist of thy: east p 11 contaL"nrrflg p phase(s) . ntaining the east -rest 103rd Avenue shall not be pinned until the con e to 100th Avenue has been platted: The intent of street from 103rd Avenue improved right of way from 103rd Avenue to 100th to ensure that there is an pro g ... ; y this condition 00th Avenue before or when 103rd 'Avenue is built. is hereby imposed to read as 4. A new condition 23 . y .. follows: The applicant shall .. provide a tem orary u around at . the feet proposed 23. pro p �e end of ro scd SW LL..... .... if a tempoi��ry dead end in excess of 150 feet i created. Lady Marion Drive " -.. provldd for the turn around area. Temporary p _ public access easement(s) shall be Page 6 - !feelings Officer eiswir LB,92- 0007 (Manias ..4 S. Condition of approve! 7 is hereby ar nde4 to add the to1iowing: Piropar*3 street names are not n!sy approved,. SivA names will be review� and apdmroved by the City and Washington County before final plat appmvaiti Larry Epste , H Page 7 - Hear s °I, ee ele&asIon SUR 92-0001 (Filarial Estates) LEGIBILITY STRIP H ,s 173NI ®® 'M' WV 1 %2 M @ 'NS HARRIS—MCMONAGLE ASSOC. BILL MCM0NAGLR 12555 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 HELEN k TEYAB 2 14820 Stici 103RD TIGARD OIL 97224 FE WARDI'N POB0k310 NEWBEnG OR 97132 LINDA JOHAN SON/REBECC.A ISELY 14875 SNP, 103RD ry TIGARD OP 97224 JEW& ITOCH 14785 SW 103RD TIM? OR 97224 STEVE DAVISON 15040 SW 100TH TIGARD OR 97224 THOMAS GILLIRAN 10275 SW HOOD VIEW TIGARD OR 97224 RICHARD 3ARTON 14915 SW 100TH TIGARD OR 97224 MR. & MRS:. ROGER C AI HT 10560 SW DEL MONTE DR TIGARD OR 97224 Permit No. 3 OMd Cuff OF TWA= - TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 'A COPY OF THIS FORM MUST HE CLEARLY POSTED ON SITE OR IN. THE POSSESS ®N ' F THE PERSON REMOVING THE TR ES DURING ALL TREE REMOVAL ACTIVITIES. 1. (EjlE . IM A iM ' OM PRO], aERTX ADDRESS / LOCATION Laip TAX NIkP ? MD TAX LOT NO C 61 ZONING 0 I-4 PROPS ctTY 'man s ParE e....__,. .;, PHONE ADDRESS 0 CITY ,� V 10 ;SIP ___171124p APP IICAN'i * ,v.ta 6 `��...._.l 1 �'' � b iGEATI3RE . 't�.d fWt2 -t- tu leiiieV .. ADDRESS ,2� .:. v.... L:�! .� •..1. 111,.... Ho & F, CITY it Ok--"J „,_ __.. �.., .,� ZIP r° r .. * When the owner ;.And applicant aye different people, the a 'ip io$At mutt be the ]purchaser of record or ya lessee in possession of written authorization fron the owner or an agent of the obluaer with tmitten authariaaat, , n. The owner (a) vust sign thili application in th €3 space provided or submit a written authorization wrLh thi,a application. 2. REASON (S) FOR TS. ' REMOVAL l�l 7%j C iA-C "i” r 7 + 1...214:01,41 ' 1,01,11,‘' ,�iy; m►rlwl sme119AMusaiilt1ewINRaataw■amemarrtl6 . voiti .�•V0Ym1.. ...... .. . .. ...... ....... ., 3. RY, LATED LAUD USE APPROVAL CASE EMBER (if applicable) e 4 '7 A. Olitaeo at *ai'. h ►hotoCopr of a tax map or esitdr plan to the bacls of thici forth. A larger Baite plan may be eubmittr,d if necea nary to adequately address the prcipoe►cd tree re'oltal. The i tte p3,.oa Shall ®laiew] 1) Vhe iodation of the bll' t Bite 41 Al or eaia ti' ,,.gl etrUoturos L ea a eete ® dedidationr4 titre u wetland® 3) A1.� ea�aleent ... o 4) All trees c°;ar six inchev) in caliper Si n ea ii sea inured four feet grade. . 5) Basic identification of Exee types (codmon »Seel)t : 1M ' Vh SITE PLAN ete of cotis4-ntcritaA., P huts le- r ; opt.. 61,4105 S tt, het i 10;t, da:44 (5.ce_ .f i /T., 5618 442 -0 Tree protoc'tion plan required Yot No Yee l�:rberrmt ' s Rat Required: � No AdOlt onal Comment ® �.41P1d /or � one ..of . nroya��: s ....Le.�..r}.,. 5;LArra#71- • e friean fa-/ Tii(2.._. S PERMIT EXPIRES ON EXTENSION IO SUBMITTED TO THE PX/\NN PERMIT LPPROVAL, Approved by trees arm ., fry UNLESS A WRITTEN REQUEST INDWAN NG DIVISION PRIOR TO THIS January 26, 1993 Mr. Jerry Offer City of Tigard 13125.S.W. Hail Blvd. P.O. Box 24397 "Tigard, OR 97223 RE MARION ESTATES SUBDIVISION TREE REMOVAL PERMIT Dear Jerry: SO 72 -000 co Enclosed is one set of construction drawings for the Marion Estates 'Subdivision submitted for a tree removal permit. Plan sheet two shu" is the gradino and tree removal plan. Plans have also been submitted to engineering and buitaing divisions for permitting and approval. Please note that tilt development will not be constructed in phases. M Tots will be constructed under one permit. If you need any additional information, please call me at 2444312. 4576 til)e a Sincerely, o HARP x i1�1-ILLl9p v FFFTDAVXT . OF MAILT.NG , STATE OF oM GoN County of Washington City of Tigard ®a. That I an a fo7 The tiky of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING YO i That I served N00,! ICE OF D E C I S I O N , Of Planning ^gdiiaia �®icu acrd Hearings Officer Tigard City 'Council. A copy (Public Hea gd tice/Note Of Exhibit " A") N� ®mai1► to each named, attacheld list marked exhibit "a3" on the bulletin board on ��' DN�I�I�� ea het to ei,d notice NOTICE nthe day of in the United Stated Mail on the postage prepaid., Decision) of which is attached (Marked cane ) at the addr s shown o�' the '►�� day cf y .. aZt Bch ®ds . gal�'tb jQb!"1 fln an' i�p�l3ror�ria�,t�! C�i b (- 9 d *7 and iepiro ited Ely of :;� ;.�: ..... . ],9 mss Sub '4xibed and sworn /affirm to :te on the NO r ,PUBLIC OF 0 8,70N 3+3�►, is &o a E airea * `' CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF AMENDED FINAL ORDER - BY I'•ro''ARI GS. OFFICER .. Concerning Case Number(s): SUS 92-0007 2. Name of Owner: Ferri WaWarp din Name of Applicant: Same 3. Address Po E e_x 31 ..a. C ty Na rtlmq �._ triii a OR R Zip 91 1332 4. Address of property t 15060 tY . 100th Avenue Tax Map and Lot No(s).: 2S1 11CB tax lots 1400 1500 and 1501. 5. Requests ,A . rec nae ®t for Subdivision scelirrainagm plAS ampva divide an aPErorirately y. .75 acres three x�srcel Bite into 23 at _raatzina .between 10 05„J and__16 8'75 eguare feet. The subdivision is PNAMMELItillaJtEVICMMZMLAILJaatJgNM1MEJLIt Shines t and ten lots. APPLICABLE CRITERIA: C mnunit D volo nent CodeCh s 18.48 18.88 18.' 2 150 160, 18.3.641„ omprehensive Plat �,r3.1020 38.144 18� _,,�..1�. Policies . 2.1.1 4.3.10_7.1.2 7.3:1 7.4.4 7.6.1 _ 8.1_a 1.. and 8.1.31,. Zone. R -3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units/acre) The R -3.5 zoning allows single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment h. hmas., farrding, manufactured ,hobos, fa *uily day Dare, hcrne occupations, temporary uses, ro sidentgl fuel tanks, and accessory structures among other uses Approval as ve ues ted X Approval with conditions ..�.... Denial 6. Actin No Notice was in the newspaper, r posted at City 3a]1 and mailed t® , The applicant a nd owner(0) record within the required diatense Owners X The affected ectedNeigh,borhood Planning Organization, C Affected governmental agencies Final AN lion: THE DECISION SHATit DE FINAL ON Au" st .21r . 19 ,.;. Fiina�.; Decision: IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning De9artment, Tigard City Wall, 13125 SW Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 90223.' 9. Arose:] s. Any party to the decision May appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(8) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that written appeal may be filed within 1.0 days after notice is given and a writty ... ed on Cit.v. forma • by appeal ($315.0P) . orma and must be accompanied the b submitted .. p y Y . p... script coati' (varies 1 fee and Iran to a maximum of $500.00). The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m '.,,fig rt 28/x!, ... ®t 2R 1.92.,. . net Bona: If you have any qu�eatior® Plarnnin . " Department, ent, 639-41716 ty ► RUG 1? ''92 14:51 MCKEEVE.R/VoRR1S, INC. e BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE C OF IrIGARD, OREGON Rzgarding an application by Ford ardin for apprwal ) AMENDED ofa preliminary ►tat for a7'34 t enble on for land ) FINAL ORDER "west of SiW 1, t ... Avenue north of SW Battler Street ) SUB 92-0007 in the R -3.5 zone tt the City of Tigard, Oregon y (Manion Estates) L REQUEST FOR AlaNDIVIENT By memorandum dated August 17m 1992, Tigard Development Review Engineer Chris Davies, requested that the Hearings Officer amend the Final Order dated August 10, 1 . DI Davies � • ` the applicant summary, Mr. laa�� notes that Condition of Approval requires That with* h the ?applicant will bad a create a 1-foot trot at the southeast edge of tl�e site r� fence. That 1 -foot tract and fence is to be osined and maintained by a homeowners association. The applicant was required to file articles of incorporation and bylaws for such a homeowners assoeiation before the ,fnal plat is approved. Mr. Davies recounts that, after the public hearing in this matter, owners of lots I through 3 in Hoodview #2 subdivision, whose lots would adjoin the 1 -foot tract requested that the City alloy ' direct vehicular access from those lots to proposed SW Lady Marion Drive. City staff do not 'abject p .. - . access, complies with the law. ' t® providing such a �s. provided it comp l Order does not prohibit such , „ , neither does it ID ath To Although the allowed. al Ord Coudiuon� of Approval 21, Mr; Davies requested that such access clarify the Hearings Examiner if odify the condition to expressly permit such access and to provide conditions under wbich such access shall be allowed. I1. APPLICABLE LE LAW Community Development issued 18,32.275provides that tho Hearings Officer can yet Cdde seetio �► amend a dal order after the ceder is ssued and before the end of the 10 -day appeal period . e of a final . eq , such a n amendment may be filed by following pss u�ce of the �Cn�.i order A g hest �c� su City staff. Such an amendment may be approved if. A. An error or omission was madz on the original notice of final decision; B. The or nal decision was' based on incorrect in o io or C, New information info on becomes av ab a durin the appeal period Which was not awa�lahh when the decisi3n.+ :das mad e wh11`t1 Arts t facts ti' conditions 111 the caging km decisio t The City is reepire,d to process an amended dt on consistent with CDC section 02 18.32.120 (Notice cf Decision by the tor), rain . '' EVALUATION ATIOPot A. The Officer Hearings der iuids that new information has berme available afser the Ito the .. was issued was ..hen the decks was Vie, to t,, the desire which not a:�aale when � . .. final order �+. t {�5ued Qe due, vehtcul r -ess to ...:. .... of lob � through 3 in lioodview 2 to hav .5�. f owners imposed SW Lady W :, 'on Drive° er can be amended Consistent ;� 1 Therefore the Final �"tt with CDC 18.3; 2751, PEvc 1- 4e /I4 F421 Order SUB 924? 0 (Meff101* 'stets} • ' AUG 17 ,p2 14,,;52, MCkLeVER/MORRISr IPA B In this cam, the Hearings Officer that direct vehicular access from lots ,' ugh 3 in Hoodview #2 should be p , provieW the owlets of . those `lo_ apply for and :twelve a street g pslaxnt the �, y "beams such ac 2s pro idW. and ided the owners of those lots pay any its as r iatrd with reloviding =di access. To achieve this modification, app language short be promded in Geis of Approval 21 and in the bylaws of the homeowners assn. .3/3 W. CONCLUSION T E DECISION The Hearings Officer conclud that Condition of Approval 21 should be =ended to add the foilog language: 'h ; bylaws of the homeow crs association shall provide that ovvnas of lots 1 through 3 in Itloo •view subdivision avail be allowed direct vehi r access ►► SW Lady Marion Drive a the 1' foot tract, tkl, Wage dingy vehicular aCCeSS is ahwred fitta each o Of the lot In r-> estto�t shy apply for wad receive lots . approval of sweet p g bt the City Tigard and sal agree i writing a cos associated w vim ch ass s inclt> a but not limited t aid � y ' • cost of modifying, g, re pig fence, s where such access is provided. py of such en accompany y app n for ,� and shall Atli/min the City and the hcmneownc s as tion'to the stet oj�C :�Sng �t enforce its tams by all means permittid by laws City .. i .., i. u t. ` r i section 18.32.121 ,, The � shah wac,nots of � a►.;+rn>t �onststcnt with � set purge Antehrki Ow SUB 02.0697 (Maraca estates) ilta day Larry 2ps aP>r s Officer • • PEMER K H•dD . II IS MR lik I lA LL 4 HARK S--MC:M AGZ,E ASSOC , BILL MCMC\GLR 12555 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 ,.7OHN SLA a: 15055 SW 100H TIGARD OR '97224 DANIEL J P . S ]ERTDA 14980 SW 103RD TIGARD OR 97224 HELEN ST Y kERT 14820 SW 103RD TIMID OR 97224 JENNY HOCH 14785 SW 103RD TIGARD OR 97224 STEVE DAVISON 15040 SW 100TH TIGARD D OR 97224 Tams GILLIHTN 10275 SW HOODVIEW TIGAIM OR 97224 RICHARD BARTON 14915 SW 100T I TIGARD OR 91224 MR. & MIS. ROGER BA GHT 10560 SW DEL M0'?TE DR. TIGARD OR 57224 O IS & JUDY H41!'.' tEL 14975 ST A 1.03RD TIM M) OR 97224 KENNETH. & ' AMMY : VAH 14835 SW 103RD TIGARD OR 97224 SUE CARVER � 5 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD OR 97224 HERD WARDIN PO BOX 310 NEWBERG OR 97132 LINDA JOHA ON /REBECCA ISELY 14875 SW 1031E CARD OR 97224 f St ow, os or ea n es° od ram- Aa !II a , L _ �i i C.IIi � bli4 o �" 6S ! a or tie 0 foot fl 3 iu Complete Industrial •• Wassta. Rera:anti Soptic`[l»utk Cleanln Sump LE�e .'Ieaning SAIVITA 1 ..'.., DM t+Achnfa Est. Ltd. X503) Customer PO, Date Blinn "far (WS CON I NC- 11 ,..... Lilt a kIn./ City . ,, : :,--,i,.'04-;,:,- � stag , r. x Zip Code a Ordered By.. .., a&r! UE. Phon 'i ,..... . R 2 Lae Conditions of tank /Distribution fox 1AL CH R tiS ,........,..._....: Schulz Sanitation in In no Way respobraibtc for &trsn+mde to the septic task or lids on !she system. 'TERMS: Net 10 days. iii %pertmonth will be Charged on past dee bc+ ouirrta, till%% per e"eil■Apa) l (f; cy , 'I1 a'; �', ��.(y •A - a� $+awls river's Sign J Md�� TEAMS AND .CONDIT ONS ON REVERE $IDS 01,0, " i 66 't). Cem fete Industr3at' Waste Iemo aI $apticd�k Cleanln ! n Cleo ing CustQn;er is iO. # Date 4'' f5 Billing Name Address r� . C 7 6.0 rH ERt4CicOD OREGON' 97;1,40 job Site City ',State k e ��IR�te r � _,.Y � � ° Zip Code 6M Ordered B Phone #1' 6 2.5 6 8 2 Date . i J ... OF 103 R0 & �� Laci�tion � C R � � �, � ,,E+;44-Wil o r Z � n ! +,Ar,; rIJ ,t,t.V 7HH4 KING CITY !RCA, '0'.t'''' '' i 4980. ,SW 103RD- , 'ill ,fry ?, f , Service Call `aIxr. ..... .....:. .w.�e -.. ._i"..w W o � Pumping _ `"'' 1 • gallon $ Conditions of tank /Distribution Box 6Cfit/ z' Senitetion la tint nip *ay teitleoetigJle ter damage to t46 i eptle stank etr tkit an the y tei TIERAAM, Net 10 doe, Or month will be C eirged ert Peet due eccekin e. ` % per an[nue ) C storner'a Signature:.._., Service Driver's SIgnatui"a ©ate "tired TERnils AND CONY, iTI NS ON AO \!ERSE Slow REDEEMA3lwi a CouNr`4 L C ?"lL l � , 7)4/15/46- , " (4- cv.,t. : e-~g4) mi /.14e45 4 = ':, s ei.e 92- "' TH47 66/46 ..4417`" .044&,t ri i:w4V V r �/s C U tt w r soa o P k& ,PP''►rEcr',A) W // 1> leeQ(J,4 ier f,41 4.,„eptio Leti6t&eMeVI .' ay a - vAief .r ,c-C1. -** 64' c� i 5 cx,A.f y4DF644 „4-4 d1 01 01.)1e, ,, 'o44E 4,iCC S o,0 ,4- ti otidt biell Live 04, ' ' 1 peO ease 4. s „4104.11 tide e.;i ... CD ttit MEIMORUI1 CITY. OF TIM M, OREGON TO: Larry Epstein August 17 199 F.'-.k: Chris Davies, De belrpmeAt Review Engineer ► F SUB 92 0007 WAi DIN /MCMONAGLE The Engineering Depar, tiient has completed iti5 review of Final Order SUB 92-007 (Marion Estates) On page 6 of Your decision You added several new cor''i tions . Our concern is condition 21 which requireeS that a 1 -foot wide tract along the south edge of proposed SW Lady Marion Drive where, it abuts : Lots 1 through 3 in the Hoodview #2 subdivision south of the site be imposed/ along with othl!r items. The Engineering Staff has had discussions' with the owneks of Lots 1 through 3 of Hoodview #2 requesting that the city ai.l')w them to have there S.W. Lady Marion . Drive . access objection to access being granted; as long as all city re a�rem no . We have ;� �. �nts are meet. While new cr�ndition 21 does not y, Y tS le should be specifically prohibit access we feel ths.�. the �.s.: addressed. We therefore r ion 21 be amended to . scat ", t' he e e�,a� mend that Condition foliowi,ng: Lots 1 through 3 of Hoodview #2 ',hall not be dernic.d. aoc0s3nr +n S ,,W. Lady Marion Drive Prior to any access be .ng granted, the owner of the al_ be required to obtain a Street opefling �ePermit . e City of .Tigard Engineering Departiment . from the CD :s92-7a t.CD ENGINEERING CCiNCNTSe SUB 92.°:0 ; QA T Tr DIN / CMONAGL • f • 1 MEMORANDUM CITi OF TIGNRD °MOH CTY O TARD TO: Larry Epst&n, Land Use Hearings Officer OR E1ON FROM? Jerr o f fer, Associate Planner c DATE luly 21, 1992 SUBJECT: SUB 92-0007 Wardin/ C: onag1e (Marion Estates) ) PHASING PLANS On July 13, 1992, you y;. a1,sa the record for subdivision SUB 92• -0007 open for foarthcr comments regarding the applicant's request to allow it,lr either of two phasing plans. The preliminary plat p 1posed a first phases that would prove e for a local street connection between SW 100th and SW 103rel Avenue to serve 13 lots g , wa *d extension of this and a second phase of 10 lots along �� Arest street (phawing plan A) , The applicant ° s engineor, Bill McMonagleff requested at the hearing that you not only approve the original hasing plan but also approve an alternative phasing plan with the to developer to choose which phas ' ng plan to follow depending on marketing ng plans or parsonal preference at the time of development. The alternative phasing plan (phasing plan B) would provide for 15 (proposed 11-23) developed off a lots r�oposaeid l.of.s � � ` 9 and lots current t< be of ' �►'�1 103rd street extending southwe ..i from th and then westward to the western edges of the site. The second hale of *has1ing plan B would include the eaatward extension of phase street to SW 100th. Yr. . McMonagle stated that storm and . s anitary sewer extensions for the entire snbdi.rrision would need to be constructed with ve1opment of phase one 02 this phasing plan B since these extensions would come from existing lines in SSW 100th and world thercbf ore Reed to exte nd across the 'proposed second phase. criteria fa: app rov na , a Code Section 18.150.050.8 proposal. ovi the finds that the pp�.�.carnt subdivision pl�s:.Sa.ne� � p � , ,� , .� . alternative phasing plant Both are consistent wx th these approval alternative � ° phasing eat standards since 1) p e r;ane nt pu b l c £ acal i tae s for the entire subdivision would nee . tO con3teaote d with the development of phase one if na. . ngpl n B is followed: or else , permanent facilities would be constructed wi t h e ach of the phases if the phasing plan A is f o llowd; 2) neither phasing plan is dependent on of the �con.strn,etiox� t em porary Public c facilities other than a temporary tut: na r o ax d w,. ,h i ch w. o .. u...:. ld the - ...... . . . ' � .. � g a t tha _ . w as e r n terminus of the itreet betwee, n lots ig and , which woOld be necessary with development o f thiu stet ui h either plan e Requiring a temporary turnaround on p, st9 eet trat s intended to be ex tended in the future is a standard CtypraCtide that never been interpreted to b e prohibited under this Code SAC aoa and 3) • 130'. 5 w� H 0104' .. � ' , �'�� I7223 r5�.�j �i3��4i'�"� •°�°�;°° J�' aft P.O.BoX23397,ll cr re Ileither phasing plan would require the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required as part of the plat approval. Daniel Sheridan, a neighbor of the proposed development site,, testified at, the hearing that the neighbors to the north opposed the phasing Arlan B as offered by fir. N.�cNonagle at the hearing since this would result in poor interconnectedness of streets and, neighborhoods. Interconnectedness of streets and neighborhoods 3 :ed by staff. as reasons for requiring the proposed F Marion Drive to connect to SW 103rd to . the north despite � Wthe were c by �' the desires of many of the neighbors to not ia orAnect these streets., Staff the need for an�ntex�connecte Planning Commission . had p d street system many tines in the review of other development plans. In essence, I believe ]Mr. Sheridan was asking the City to be consistent in applying this poi. ?.cy, whether it be to an ultimate development plan or a partial development plan. In addit.io e Mr. Sheridan noted that phasing pla.n ILI would result in creation of a temporary dead, end street of approximately 730 feet in length whereas Code Section 18.164.030.E states that cul de sac streets shall be as short as possible, and shall in no 1event be more than 400 it long. As you know, the City has a1. owed this standard to be exceeded many times on streets that are intendd to be extended in the future and has app Lied .ed this standard to permanent dead end streets only However, staff does find that Mr, Sheridan's point regarding the inter- connectedness o.{ streets and neighborhoods has substantial merit in this case. Plan Policy . plan. for a safe and efficient sItreet systemca Delaying gdevtelo development of this connection between SW �? S 1.03��d. and SW 100t while adding the potential for additional traffic f rc „ 15 residences would appear to be inconsistent w3,th the Plan's directive of planning for an efficient street system For this reason, we recommend that you find that phasing plan 13 as presented at the j hearing 4 _' with Plan Policy 8.1.1 because it would not provide deve,l spent of a logical 1�`._ p p g 1 an 3 efficient street system at the time of proposed development. Despite staff's comment above that both phasing plans are e.i.��re. it is implicit ,d a ,p ,i criteria for a phasing plane we consistent with the Code a a �roval cr3.ter also believe mpL cit t1� .ai.. each p ease must be able to etanc on its town with regard to the subdivision approval criteria, Staff finds that phasing plan B is not consistent, with Play, Polity 8.1.1 and therefore should not be approved, We continue recommend ` approval of the pheta in g an A subject to the to conditions . f approval contained in the Staff request to However, .�ovide f� • ��-' �. choose _. . . �. � y a . � ° � 'i� ®.: .. s should you choose to approve Mr. Mc nagle s either phasing lat a °coma Lion of approval should be added requiring ° p g p • � r., the eastern portion of the of and ... through construction 't��arnti sewers `� � � -_ eastern x P . �t with development on the western hall., e.s proposed in phasing plan H I . tion, if phasing ., s n ao3c�.�. .. ° of street improvez.envs as�a�ng.. plan 8 is all:�,:.��d � coin�tructa.e�n. along SW 100th should be specifically stated to be deferred tntil construction of phase two TEMPORARY TURNAROUND It ,include a recommended condition, that the staff report neglected to also has come to my attention of approval. requiring a temporary p . Lady ive at the �wdst ®rn. ed. a ref the s�tee terminus m� SW dad Marion Drive turnaround a=�, the � �� o.sra . turnaround at the hearing and I believe Mr. . McMona 1 e concurred I mentioned oned the need for g � e concurred that this was approipr:tate. The final decision sho ,ld include the fol,l Cling condition A temporary turn around shall be provided at the terminus of the proposed SW Marion Drive if a temporary dead end in n excess of 50 feet is cret. t. Temporary public access easement (s) shall, be provided for the turnaa ound area FIRE PINTS ,.-TION Additionally, e er letter Kr. and Mrs. Roger Haight concerning f w re P tection during .ion While staf f understandsespecially c current al condition we their concerns, that special conditions of approval are warranted arelxt;,re to fire protection during construction for t e following reasons _ First, fire hydrants are available adjacent to the site on r W 100th. and SW 103rd and existing driveways throu h s�, g through site already. provide good access to all portions of the site for fire fighters, Second, o;ie of the first steps in actual development of the site i.s typically removal of undergrowth, the most flammable m, terial, on the site; this should help reduce the potential for lire during construuc tion. Third, chances are that conditions will not be as dry .Ea They presently are by the time of construction so the potential for fire should be reduced. Finally, the Rai hts do not sou Best what sorb of fire g� protection measure:, 4 :ley feel should be utilized during construction. Perhaps the most cOmmon fire protection measure during construct .on is to cut a fire . .. zone around the perimeter of the This obviously would require the he sito. e and or clear zon. arcaua� g with removal of �a � great nu.��ber of mature trees on the site subject ot�sible reduction in desirability and p devaluation o f j propep;ty and adjoining parcels. STREET I A,Ic s The finial b should state � proposed Street names are not necelsariZ approved. Qved. Street names will nd to be reviewed and approved by the city and Washington County at the time of final plat review. LUBA APP: related to note 9 of •the ' Co .re ;yens i.re Man °,s T Plan T hair attached a variety of information on the pending L appeal � a gal M ip P1ea a contact me or MP le Ra binson f ra��ti nee YOu er you need iurihex� information on this item 1«iE #W1Ek4mMt M4tNM»k%x!cad+A -- .lnwwdrWrwKllrl �tirr�r.,wMwi IMiN�4M«aE�JC,6r`M4M{tibI f..x•: •AYX«M /1/ /MtNU: r1. Ik, rl.1«IN. .W}IIf WMM111W ,WR'.Yk11%.'LLViv�rWrC.#WhkMNki' CI N VA #�wuMn1 - .uaaMw�e.,+.wr++.ary 1 «f1N;,k1 r1 v- WwlwMUwww- «w.w. C1 Eir: #qM. / i wN :iNNMYwL.:NRNay.Ma.,Aw..'NnaPx .T.,...— u�MA#W MRY wWkNW�M4usN+WwWV A1MrFW�4'L#S�M'i+n+i'M1 i itiC,Die 1. 4 .4'f ^./w> hWW::IgA 'Etsw/VMM /MMDnMh"y P. i1 ■ Wli �r;t: #x:x# #.w.a: #.'ypfMlwf l?.,YiM1.'p4:Y#r l r' iuN1�0� +YbMWIW1N.11Y�WN�`MF'��IP,YIi rww: emu+ n a a. a✓,x.x.. lre# Nna�. x; uFY✓: 1kti .lM�eMnli�b�w+MlwxsNN�N+wMl:a 'Or Y.rnW'A'+!knf#!#Mi-W xyjMMNa4pfN14gYp1N 80A.anzYab.M3Yr:rt[ki.;r iLr:t:.'sil u 1.0,000 0.00.4..0-1+000,0 A0.00.0191Y= 4 'LIWgWT +'tl'a'+a#?'NeWlt /Ue'iV : 4414, WMxu »JUqu.411kaYWrbN1#I'W%Y+W +.W KMWr+ hgNr ,NHilptM:INAIhVM'VSV.�r:.n:: Y[t;/xe sW Max.t['.:,4.N.Y Mh :�MS':+I:lkb•Ww:.Y.u+etWUW.itiHA A4 `r4dt /.N.V+..u:ptMMYKa.t K.w.�nM+R;M MW<I .urq l:,+xUr,•gY:�_31Y4,11, V%:Mlj VWiWM'+4 +kW<,S ^xpfiMWYtr'•.HI:. YYY4nfr[ fw%.+ M, IrkAY!' 3it1�0, 11 Nxt •;:hn.'W4W4WVa'LCYYq.i:MN'#�pp MM.YYWf rt ,=.a".�rwoB�.Hrf •x#aA,V WrXiFY's',l•{�IM �!!`:r W1rVPUefP+auA4 1:tt PAYifalU 114 Ma#' {,N,kr5p5/,: ':N�'NwM #f#c'1tK,WVn 10 „py,t#k'a:t4�:41• GM't,,=, q:MyIbtWV, # t!M14, ,O,,,Rii1d1CJ'Yfv.G4“..t.h, Itt 44444440414 ■ 4 ,144 4411,bW . e V4, 4-41,4 4444 441:1,, ?f;+eV'VA. ru'., H + +NN ust'- A :VwY24: w+]'ri uL tl +Yi4' 05, . w3tlMYtaYM:.,OY,?� Y•Wv01rh'rFwY+:4+.1NFt'.T xVk�w'kt+M1Y,;.W+t .ktlH#[fPYAVW.:041 [44YIC -a IPotu,NNal h.l!x:aFYxun AMpsanYa;'Y1:,Twl#Y f.' :tr, Ft. ,,,,, • 00 Fx'.1Wlw,ik`M,h9Y1MNWttl,,,V uyt Nx+ 541.y Yf kWyMfM1 .fYlelM.NfNS�NLNMr•iHR'S p,.'r[.bWFxfyP #pwt"#N.'A' Y.10:4Y:. 'LI ("11/4) �• Fwd ' .441/t. 1qf<# W[ ypii.' YYxV, V ;At+JSi�sVUJ ?U:4MN'FI /1'+cWVFYi 4w#tilYi 44 N4Y.Y+:41YI X41 [WN#;YYfM MWiX•Y'MWWlf l FYk1 �[ biWrIVaMN�NhW +*w.[tu+trHWMw1v,4WA ,:. w'. W45WIW?i'.14.:WiMMgNY�fM�)W4Yr. rtCWnikYYtlliMA >alW'V,!'#AMYNtaIWWAW 4k] YVVVinMWYWh4 .NTi4'IkMMNk01.[ «M##1CiiWNUa �aL,x ttmv. ,'.,W'xrl.raxaWl w =.m SV .r•4. f ` �W, �M4w 1.414 :TY`Y.F1.Faxvi tl1 NNNPPP.ar"'."'. x,,444014 Nq YM tl# Mb •Y #Mr,FMYFkN/a4M11nY/yNrT!9M,PR Hl [r,Y- '.N64#Ipp#t WH+if, �xi'tm,,wvlah4AW +f � wMNa br,F1+x AgsexX;u: 1±0Hk {tlWWMM14Y'rr.HNl NYYM4Ywe41MkM�MiiM1a >wNkCq[uslyswHar4 'ixwF4xmv # }µ flAitt) 11,44 1044 � ,ifm a,[ .�_ ral_ W�+ nwv:;: �N4i ,.,+.rr.rµr�wl +'..awwwwnb�w+ fm[ wr .>.rfs,ehWa++dwr�ucwb,alea:lut �0� tNetty .Y4rKkM[Kpi'p41144 plite 1 r.; ii.,IttIY1W0WfJ:F "['!i1:CJA u4rf P:44tiYTrAMnf a.inXlluvN :rfl lu[. b. YRr+ caJ. u. a1uY:. rYwn,:: f. iaMc,a t:,+ GwY�utMAlY: rcf4f# 1i+ 9nwl.# I. uwca; llsw '.f/r1yrtNY3,71+�w°WY+Mwr�'w.r YCm1. U�fw.+ W+ �l^[ Yu�hed+ w:. N. b+. w'+ Y.. a« WF�1. khMMIWN !vlf!#M+Y.Y +.!�a4#�MY�wifb,ti ♦ YAtYe%..y,X =1 sMW {"6h f�iMY`W i'Nb�M14NYJ.W(N�4WYlKt' 144. Fth' dJn#=+ wV. PW+ tMwawviuY ,WwYrx�FW- 'f�iM4 +�,aale xy.uff «+rbwne r dXbsaariwirxtimwy +•,w:.w.alia.9aw ir.+fb+a�wcakq!f�Jr. o The meeti0 ad3oui n .d: WP #6 tees from the June 17 , 19 :xw ii Yt The mttiteting was called to order at 7:40 pm `�'e" attendance were: Carver, Davenport, Kasson, Watson and r�.:ai�f�aer� an Sellers. Excused: Clinton, Di11it, Mitchell, and Pasteris Before Valerie ahrs�n business 'Vale �ei.,�� r�� began, joined � u� for NPa 5 a presentation by NP's �n�. th�.�;r, role in the cQr�mun t with They h��Council's thoughts c:i,�t:t; , errring 3 >, ��, ' be as Y• art a volunta'er � time to , effective, proriuctjve and beneficial as po;•�sible and feel that perhaps some changes need to be made to 1-3110 achieve this. °'he goal bein.q a more "Proactive" community'. OVer . 1 �� ' � m�d Board Members will have an opportunity to share videas on the w this s�.l goal can be achieved. May minutes were with the following The with l ®w�.ng rorreCt�.o�,� I��.ly,i�a was excused. r � �,ppr� SUB 92-000't Applicant requests subdivis-aon a � e an approuimately Wad 75 wore, three parcel � pproval �c d�.va.d • a between Proposed s Y'�iigLrl� 10,057 and 16,i375 square feet. The subdivision is 23 lots to be developed in two ,Phases of thirteen and ten lots. The applicant Ford Vfardin and Kathy lei l ing a property owner on the south side of the proposed development attended the ,meetin_ ° a�thy was south about the, row of trees that directly abut 4s. W ,rd ' � Y n s property tan . the passed: uth Last corner. A l tve1 ' discussion f cal l ov d read the following motion ��M ,. 7» a t+ � ,' h th ti 1 , .t') stalled. , r .... the ,t? 1, I J t u ° t;a Lot 1'0 a' drag ' cri the era , on ; h+ f south sid and usash 'dual he).P saver eXs:a. La •;t or;:.> 's .y .:..Mar on :D o..' �l�� spacoc �,, "t,ha � wou 3 d r &area es an b Lain ao Air Gn • The for 1 oc n moti.ors wore pays ed' and aro • di reoted to the 001,00i 1: $P© S believes, that NPO i teetings • ant their ac enala ° s shoi. l dt+° + publicized .1,n the ataedia be 1O 6 believes 'tha' ;ted n .s , d px opera y 0:0 ems. t a�fe an Y d b► ahei�:�=�e��t�vene�a the f the •��PQ � r ata� an asu o �' � � e n the a end, thereby �,x�c.. e4sa.nq the . 411 ' • • it r RECEIVED NANNING JUL ®6' 1992 Jerry Offer Staff P1ann� r City of Tigard Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Hr. Offer, This letter is in response to File No SUB 92-00(fl, a :raquest for as subdivision preliminary plat approval that is scheduled for public hearing on July 13, :992 at 7 p.m. We are requesting that this letter be made a part of the written testimony in objection to the p,M y Plans �s submitted and that it be submitted and ��1��2 heas of�xc � read .y th As Dan discussed With you on the telephone on or about June 25 or 26, 1992 as the h - t ao th ,�s 9 • � ,o��e owners �e upposed tt,� tk�e a�ol'lt,a� closest of 103rd proposed subdivision, pp naa proposed i,rQ Lady Drive. The first half of Ave this . to letter addresses what you have assured us we cannot have. The second half of this letter is an alternate plan that involves a modest compromise for all concerned parties. 4e have great concerns c n cwrn s that eat_ end a n g 103rd .. Ave will result in a significant incroase in traffic from those who will live in the proposed subdivision and, more important, tram non-residents who will use 10 3rd Ave a s a f eedor tweet o "short out through the neighborhood. Historically, tried to cut � � ,. , � a_. �C►n�. to f1�'iC�, that ...'�,i,. • ..ea the �.�Arga 11 �� of ��'� �A'Vc�Q3ml'I�� have �� through" ..he neighborhood via, 1 y presently dead ends. Just this year, after my 9 year old son was strue7 by p • p - e �rhe pity of end. street wcar n a our house, the City t the corner of 103 rd and b a pick truck in front of dead q Del Monte erected a gld sign on Del Monte as it meets 103rd. This has markedly reduced the flow of traffic of non rased nts through out neighborhood. hbor- hood +, • Change that. . � ... ,.. , . mhe ��opos ant 1 � rd �.v�� to have s laamm� rhead Ili an ideal world, we Mould want dead end at its present location, There are p reCe de r.. tia for .. C �w y g - �. access to SW L a .. d tMario) . , .. ar ve limited to 100th Ave. The streets immediately to the South of the proposed SW Lady Marion Drive, SW foo d v.� y �ew Drive and SW Kable Street both only elicit 100th t , With Sh . re development of the plots of lad to the West of this Plot, SW Marion Drive can connect with SW 106th Ave and with SW 109th Street =. Both of these streets would provide easier Etccess to Daniel J. Sheridan Margaret An Jazsa 14980 SW 103rd Ave Tigard, OR 97224 • 411 Pacific Highway. 109th Avenue, which already has multiple apartment complexes and is zohed for moree is better suited as a feeder street than 103rd Ave. Interco nnectedness could be achieved by connecting SW Lady Marion Drive with SW Hood View and SW Kahle when the plot of lend to the west is developed. Having stated the above, we understand that for all practical purposes, the decision to extend 103rd Avenue h s alr 2+ady been made, You stated to me that the decision to extend 103rd Ave is " fait de coanplet." You further stated the "de, :ksion to a ctend 103rd Ave was made 30 years ago when the Del Monts subdivloion was built." Your non- compromising attitude during your telephone conversation has done little to instill any positive feelingo into this governmental process that is supposed to provide for tangible citilten input and participation. Since the decision to extend 103rd Ave. has already been made and Lett es like these from concerted neighbor seem to be nothing more than a charade of due process, we will not waste more of your time asking for what we can never have. However, here is the alternate plan that you asked us to coma up with that would be fair to all concerned. A plan that you as our paid city planner, could have helped us to dev'elopif you we te e no blinded by bureaucratic tunnel vision. Go ahead and connect 103rd Avenue to SW Lady Marioan Drive as you have already decided to do. However, as a City Planner, you have a responsibility to protect the safety of the residents (esp. children) who live on and visit residents of 103rd Ave., Del Monte Street, Murdock, and SW Lady Marion Drive. You also have a responsibility to protect, the integrity of this quiet residential neighborhood. You also have a responsibility to make decisions and recommendations that protect the resale value of the homes that have been in the neighborhood for decades. You can meet your responsibilities by requiring the developr to install three -way stop signs at the following four intersections. 1. Murdock and 103rd Ave 2. 103rd Ave and Del Monte 1. 103rd Ave and SW Lady Marion Drive 4. SW Lady Marion Drive and 100th Ave turn left on Murdock and not encounter a stop sign Street, Presently, one can travel south on 103rd Acre from Mc n McDonald S :eet, you can travAvenue or ou c et south on 103rd Ave Avg: from McDonald street and not encounter cnyy stop signs until 103rd Ave. dead ends in front of our hoUs� , °Chis sort of traffic pattern does nothing but y encourage speeding and short - cutting through our neighborhood. Seties Of stop.; sagas, you have met the amity'' S � installing tlh�s set, BY ].re for g].2',4terco$'lln '.e S s while v . Meeting th neighbors .., tedno�s a� �tr� .�ts w i1e h conc0.1,rns that 103rd Ave. and SW Lady Marion Drive Vil NOT beco ie feeder streets and a neighborhood 6'short -scut. oe Traffic; into thie new sp.b-cliv:ision itiOenfirl be primarily limited to residents and their guests. kionmresiden t short -cutters will not venture more than once throti h a series of stop signs designs d to keep the flow of traffic primarily advantageous to the rei`ents of this quiet neighborhood. This hi s ser i es of stop ii ; s will hive little to no on emergency xes under s whose desire for interconnectedness ostensibl y at h? root �� this debate. m 'RECEIVED 10 Dennis Hummel JUG.�9 Judy Hummel 14975 SIa1103 Ave. Tigard, OR 97224 Jerry Offer Staff Planner City of Tigard Tigard p it. Hall 1 125 t' Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Offer July 10, 1 9'2 This letter is in response to File No SUB 92 -0007, a request for a subdivision preliminary plat approval that is scheduled for public hearing on July 13, 1992 at 7 p.m. am requesting I q ��esting that this letter be made a part of the written testimony in objection to the preliminary plans as submitt d and that it be read by the hearings officer. Specifically, l am opposed to the proposed continuation of 1 U3rd Ave. meet the proposed SW Lady Marion Drive, a home owner on 103rd Ave I have great concerns that extending 103rd Ave will resuitdt in a significant increase in traffic from those who will live in the proposed subdivision and more important, from m non- residents who will use 103 av Ave as a feeder street or "short cur through the neighborhood. Historically, large numbers of non-residents have ted to "cat through" the neighborhood via 103rd Ave only to find that it prese t y dead ends. The City of Ti gard juet this year erected a dead end street sign at the comer of 1 03rd and Del Monte and a yield s►n on Del Monte as it meets 1 03rd. This has markedly reduce the flow of traffic of non-residents through our neighborhood. However, extending 103rd Ave to meet SW Lady Marion Drive Would result in a large increase !n traffic and an �r gei. i .. this �, �� w e in the ne�ghborh�►od: It will ..areirr adverse impact g . . P ig y p'� .:. '' peaceful, , traveled t the of liven oil hl�is now r` b�c�ful li ` tl . � values street. This in turn will have a negative iixrpac On home resident, make resale of homes more difficult. There are precedents for making aces to SW Lady Marion Drive limited to 1 00th Ave. The two stree e irnmpdt i ate'►y to the south of the proposed SW o Lade Marion Drive, Sw Head View Drive and SW �� able Street both only exit unto ' rwe 100th Ave. VUhh the future development of the plots of land to the West of this plot, SW Marion Drive can connect with SW 106th Ave. and with SW 109th Street. Both of these streets would provide easier access to Pacific Highway. 109th Avenue, which already has multiple apartment complexes and is zoned for more, Its better suited as a feeder street than 103rd Ave. Every resident of 103rd Avenue, between the proposed site and the Murdock Street is against the proposed extension of 103rd, Please note that none of us object to the construction of the subdivision by Mr. Ford Wardin, just the extension of the 103 ro Ave.. I would like to suggest that limiting access to the tomes on SW Lady Marion Drive to 100th Ave will also be attractive to the future homes owners and City of Tigard citizens who would undoubtedly be concerned about non residents using their r treet as "short cut." A City of Tigard p lannin g official told one of our neighbors on Wednesday, 14 that " it makes good planning sense for the city to extend 103rd." He also said he did lot think the city would change its mind. Is that how government wore,s in l'I'gard? Do city employees make decisions that effect the lives of Tigard citizens without concern for the wishes of the people that l,live in those neighborhoods? When comments lake that are made by it feels like deci Bien have already boon made, prior to a hearing:, I hope that is not true. From my perspective it does not make good sense to adversely effect the quality of m y my life and the valve of my home because on a mAp V. looks good to of , point _ . not benefit, .. extend a street a few ` , ... view there is #, calla harm. w feet From my ty strongly oppose ... Therefore, as Lady citizen of this community I afros l o �oso continuing a � 103rd to meet SW Lady Marion Drive). Thank you. Sincerely, 'Jud % = nd_ Dennis HUM.tri . Mays LAIR Tigard C`oity Council WAIRIMIN Jerry Offer Staff Planner City of Tigard Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 'Kenneth A. Hahn ' Tammy R. Hahn 14835 SW 103rd Ave. .fo 'Tigard,' OR 97224 {June 29, 1Y92 Dear Mr. Offer: Thi • letter is in response to File 'Wo SUB 92 -(007 ` a reque; fo.x a subdivision reliminary;�' plat 'approval that is scheduled for public hearing Jul. 13, 1992 at 7 P.M. I am requesting that p g y this letter be made a part of the written testimony in objection to the preliminary plans as submitted and that it be read by the hearings officer. ra osed continuat?n of 103rd Specifically, am apposed. to the p p Ave to meet the proposed SW Lady Marion Drive. As a home owner on great Ave I have reat concerns that extending 103rd Ave will re sult in a significant increase in traffic from those who live in the proposed subdivision and, more importantly, from non- residents whq, will use 103rd Ave as a feeder street or "short cute' through our neighborhood - Historically, lal.'ge numbers of non - residents he tried to "cut g ° the g. throw h e n�.i hborhood via 103rd Ave only to find that it presently dead ends. The City of Tigard just this year erected a yl eld sign ran Del Monte as it meets 103rd. This has markedl;'f reduced the flow of traffic of non-residents through our neigh- borhood. H g ' t S't Lady Marion .Drive �tould • .resulerineat3:arge. increasev nttraff' g_.. axe adversP� chars a in .,. ne,i ._.hbo'rhaod It t il:l }mpact the c esa rability of J.,.x.v,.ng on 1;aUr g •this naw p_ , �:ightly t Uel.ed re�irr,�..entia�. street e �;: �.: • will. htiv: •a n ►gative i tp c't on home. values and make resale of homes mc» e d J fz cult T `here are precedent for makin ng acc0$ 4 tc• SW Lady �fimited .to OOth Ave e .The two i treets r mmediate1y t' vheaso t of µ tY�e era osed S� dad Mari..,n 1. rive ., S �] kiood- �' p y Kabl e Street, bot of ly exit onto 100t � Ave with athe future dev e l o�men . t of the • Mari n Drav e ran. pl.o�r . s of 'F � .an d , to the r aw�reidst e eof a s t ke�..r ��. o .. th SW Bcth of tannect wa,th Sr�ouO th Ave an hese streets W Pacifio Hir hwa1: 149 .. eady has multiple Apartment complexes and is zoned for more is better suited as a feeder street 41than 103rd Ave . ` Every resIdexit of 103rd Ave between the proposed site and 'Mvrdock Street is against the proposed extension of 103rd Ave. Please note that none o�. us object to the construction of the subdivi- sion of sion by' M . Ferd Ward.in, just the extension of 103rd Ave. I would hike to suggest that limiting access to the homes on SW fadY 100th Ave .' wil also be attractive to the ture home owners and City Cit of Tigard citizens who would undoubtedly be concerned about non -re zidentw usinc their street as a "short cut." When we recently purchased our home, we know this as a major consideration for us, We looked for a quiet neighborhood in a lightly traveled area where'i it would be safe or, `' our children to play and ride their' bike ",s . II ,A City of Tigard planning, official told one a�k our neighbors on Ab J+ 1 y, "it a,I inning sense for the T�ednescia �7une 24 that it ma s good pl , y to extend 103rd." overnment` works in T City 4rt�,,rniK9l�ld change its mind. Is that howdghe did not think the City g Do city employees make: decisions that affect the lives of Tigard citizens without concern for the wishes of the ,people le who live in those neighborhood ..; When comments like that are made; it feels like decisions have: already been made, prior to a hearing. I hope that is not true' d sense L'�om my perspective it does not ,' �' � e Cim ahorne adversely k�ecause on make o0 the alit of my life and the value y A a map tit looks good, to a city employee to extend a street 'a few feet. From m� point benefit, y r 1 P ti citizen of viewh�.s�erommunY.t ��.n.�tr�an �.r�l� hat�.m. s o o s e continuing 103rd to meet oSWtLady Marion Drive . g y oppose Thank you. Sincerely f' • .t r ntl. Q:c T. r Jerry Offer Staff Piannar City of Tigard Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 ��//�'jjy�j , . ` �Y�'j your name - "'"``�9 2 4/7 e.. j1. d Ave. �L. *Mae* address SW 1 03r Ti.card, OR 97224 °J`une 25; 199 2 Dear Mr. Offs ", This letter is in response to File No SUB 92- 0007, a regtaest for a subdivision pri liminary plat approvR1 flat is sc heduled for public hearing on July 13, 1992 at 7 p.m. l aiu reque oting that this letter be made a part of th testimony j �.: written in objection to the, preliminary rninary plans as submitted and that it be read by the hearings officer. Specifically, l am opposed to the pry- posed continuation of 103rd Ave to meet the proposed SW Lady Marion Drive. As a home owner on 103rd Ave I have great Concerns that extendi*ig 203rd Ave will result in a significant n ficant increase in traffic fr nm those who will live in the proposed subdivision and, more important, from 'son- res (dents who will use 103rd Ave as a feeder street or "short cut' through the neighborhood. Historically, large numbers of non- residents have tried to "cu` through" the neighborhood via 103rd Ave. only to find that it presently dead ends. The City of Tigard "past this year erected a dead end street sign at the corner of 103rd and Del Monte and a yield sign on 1".,e Monte as i n meet* 103. tis Las markedly` reduced the flow of traffic of on re n .0 through our neighborhood. However, exten�ingY` + ~ "N "�. y r, ive would + g ".. e�in traffTiceand am adverseoc result- ��.n a 1"ar a ant.. change in the neighborhood. It x .:a impact the desirability of living on this now peaceful, lightly- traveled residential Street. This in turn will have difficult. impact on home values and make resale of homes more negative There ,e are_ Precedents s for making access to �? SW Lady Ma�, �' on Drove limited Proposed SW Ladd► Marion Drive, immediately : to the sautth, Y t .. of � to 107th the pr p , Rood View Dr1V4 and SW `ahle S treet 'both Only exit unto 10e th Avenue, With the fut Urie develcA;ment, of the plots of land to the plot SW West ��f this ' � r . Marion Drive ccln connect with SW 16th Ave and with vW 109th Street. et Both Of t lese r.. ne e is would provide de ea eXe r aro, ' a es to Pacific Highway. 109t,H Avenue, which already has multiple apartment cot Pleaea and is zoned for more, is better suited as a feed er street than 103rd Aver .. Every resident of 1Q rd ,Avenue, ketifeen the proposed it and Murdock Street is against the propoeed a en$ion of, , 103rd.' P t pe note that none of use object o the construction of the s ub�divis. ,an by , Mr. Feed WardinI 'just the extension oaf 1O3 'd 'Ave. 1 would like to suggest that limiting access to the ,; .none on SW Lady I lftrion, Drive to 100tH Ave witl also be attraftive to the Tutu ;e home owners and City of Tigard citizens Who would undoubtedly" be concerned , about no ro.eidents using their street as e'shor but o �q A city of augtird planirting` toid one our neighbors on Wedn ;sdady 8 dune Z ' that. v' it makes good punning sense for the City to extend. 1.O3rd. or, He also said he did not think the ,change itr, mind. Is that hOi government nt ,works gard / Do city 6MployeeS make decisions that effect the ,liVea r Tigard citizens wit orlt concern for the wishes of the people that live .: thOse ne i hbcx fO Whert �� mm� like that are * by it •f e 4 s decisions knave already ,4.n madeprior 1 i 41 t� a hearing. T 1��+�e that, . nc t truo S not mane oad, sense tc adversely d f ect �� my �� °��%� it ��g � the qulity of u! ' life and the value of rsy, home because on a Map, it lacks od Co extend a street a fey+ f ei t 0 j From qty point of view n• , � ..� i ' p ,.' .. ':.' this there is no b�� f �.t Only ha�'�n �lhere�`r.�re as � citi�`ena of t� �. co tunity I stir& ngly oppose Jontinuinq 1t rd to meet SW lady Marion Sincerely, Cc. Mayor All Tigard city council Jerry Offer Staff Planner City of Tigard Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hal? Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 1, Jo61LG your name Its Le c . Lt ex et address SW 103rd Ave. �-- Tigard, OR 97224 June 25, 1992 Dear Mr. Offer, This letter is in response to File Not SUB 92 -0007, a request for a subdivision preliminary plat approval that is scheduled for public hearing on July 13, 1992 at 7 p.m. I am request .ncJ that this letter be made a part of the written testimony in objection to the preliminary plans as submitted and that it be read. by the hearings officer. Specifically, 1 lam opposed to the proposed continuation of 103rd Ave to meet the proposed SW Lady M rien Drive. As a home owner on 103rd Ave I have great concerns that extending 103rd Ave will result in a significant increase in traffic from those who will live in the proposed subdivision and, more important, from non- residents who will use 103rd Ave as a feeder street or "short c:ut°' through the neighborhood. Historically, large numbers of non- residents have tried to "cut through" the neighborhood via 103rd Ave. only to find that it presently dead ends. The City of Tigard just this year erected a dead end street sign at the corner o ' 103rd and Del Monte and a yield sign on Del Monte as it meets 103rd. This has markedly reduced the flow of traffic of non - residents through our neighborhood. However, extending 103rd Avenue to meet SW Lady Marion Drive would reeult in a large increase in traffic and an adverse change in the neighborhood It will .impact , the desirability of living on this now peaceful, lightly-traveled residential street. This in turn will have a negative impact on home valx es and make resale of homes more °c icult. • e are precedents for making access to SW Lady Marion Drive r , .. ni a .. ie�.ted to 100th Ave. The two , View Drive the South of SW Hoc:, e the proposed SW Lady Marion Drive, � meets �nnimed�.ately ve and "W 'cable Street both only exit unto 100th i�ivenUe. With the future development of the plots of land to the West of this plot, 8W Marion Drive can connect with SW 106th AVe and with SW 109th Street Both of these Streets provide easier access to Pacific Highway. 109th Avenue, whi h already has multi e apartment om x more,' suited p a eet�than ��.�03rC�. Ave zoned '�+�?�" l� better 'as a feeder street Every resident of 103rd Avenue, between the proposed sit- and Murdock Street is against the proposed extension of 103rd. Please note that none of us object to the construction of the sub-division by Mr. Ferd Wardin, just the extension of 103rd Ave. I 11,ould like t:o suggest that limiting , access to the ho es on SW Lady Marion Drive to Ott Ave will also be attractive to the - future home �,© i owners and City of Tigard citizens who would undoubtedly be concerned about non- residents using their street as "short Cut." A City of Tigard planning official told one our neighbors on Wednesday, June 24 that Sit makes good planning sense for the City to extend 103rd d ° He also said he did not think the city would change . Is that how government Works in Tigard? Do city � . �, . � Mind. e • p y • lives of Tigard citizens without concern decisions that effect im �► ees made d for the wishes of the the l �. people that live in those neighborhoods? are made by i� feels like '� When co�nmen�ts like that; deci. ions have already been made, prior to a hearing I hope that is not true thema1Z perspective life and not good Prom sense to adversely effect looks . good my the value of my home because on a map it ood to extend a s ;rest a few feet. From my ` point of view there ha en is I strongly t , only harm. Therefore, as a citizen of this �.s no benefit, .� oppose 103rd to meet SW Drive. Lady Marion pp ®se continuin Thank you, sincerely, 1 cc. MaYor All Tigard City Council • RECEIVED PLANNING JUL 101992 Jrry Offer Staff Planner City of Tigard Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Offer Dennis Hummel Judy Hummel 14975 SW103 ,Ave Tigard, OR 97224 July 10, 1992 This letter is in response to File Na: SUB 92-0007, a request fee' a subdivision preliminary plat approval that is scheduled for public hearing on July 13, 1992 at 7 p.m. I am requesting that this letter be made a part of the written testimony in objection to the preliminary plans a submitted and that it be read by the hearings officer. Specifically, I am opposed to the proposed continuation of 103rd Ave. meet the proposed SW Lady Marion Drive. As a home owner on 103rd Ave I have great concerns that extending 103rd reoe will result,t in a significant increase in traffic from those who will live in the proposed subdivision and more important, from non--esidents who will use 103 av Ave as a feeder street or "short cut" through the neighborhood. Historically, large numbers of non-residents have tried to "cut through" the neighborhood via 103rd Ave only to find that it presently dead ends. The City of Tigard just this year erected a dead end street sign at the corner of 103rd and Del Monte and a yield sign on Del Monte as it meets 103rd. This has markedly reduce the flow of traffic of non-residents through our neighborhood. However, extending 103rd Ave to meet SW Lady Marion Drive would result in a large increase in traffic and an adverse change in the neighborhood, It will impact the desirability of living on this now peaceful, lightly traveled residential street. This in turn will have a negative impact on home values and make resale of homes more difficult. There are precedents for making accesi: to SW Lady Marion Drive limited to 100th Ave. The two streets immediately to the south of line proposed SW ,." „(.::,t_6"' 4:4; 7%. CO Lade Marion Drive, w Hood View Drive and Street both only exit unto Drive, Viable 'o�tr 100th Ave. With the future: development o plots . to the West of this f the lilts of land t� t p • Y connect with SW 1O th Ave. and with SW 109th lot, Marion Driv can corm Street. Both of these Pacific Highway. streets would provide easier access to for 109th Avenue, which already has multiple apartment complexes and is zoned more, is better suited as a feeder street than 103rd A. Every resident of 103rd Avenue, etwoen the proposed site and the b p p Murdock Street is , against the proposed extension of 103rd. Please note that none of us construction h . i by [ object to the cdnstr�ictson of the subdivision b Mr. � Ferd V�'ard .n, just • suggest limiting access to the ext�,rossord p# the 103 rd Ave.. A� ® would like to su ®fit t a� s�o a the hoes on SW Lad y Marion Drive to 100th Ave will also be attractive to the future homes owners and City of Tigard citizens who would undoubtedly be concerned about non residents using their street as "short cut.' A City of Tigard plarning official told one of our neighbors on Wednesday, "i g planning extend 103rd." He t "it makes c�oe��! sense #� June 1 � the, � for the city to also said he did not think tine city would change its mind. how Is that h0 government ig '"� city y make decisions that effect the overnrr�ent works in Ts • � Y. e . • Tigard? Do 9.O�t e'�1� �y�es . f the that I'" Isve s without concern for the wishes o f people e lives of Tigard citizens comments like that are made by it feels like in t When cc those neighborhoods? tier t� a hearing. i hope that is not true decision have already been made, prior g p my perspective it does not make good sense to adversely effect tl From rn ps not the quality my looks good to �aalit of m� life and the value of my ► home because on a map it extend a street a few feet. From my point of view there is not benefit, only harm. Therefore, as a citizen of this community I strongly oppose continuing 103rd to rneet SW Lady Marion Drive. Thank you. Sincerely, eceek etieteese) (Judy 7 d Dennis Hummel cc. Mayor M Tigard City Council .q r W " r' - Jerry Offer Staff Planner City of Tigard Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Offer: Kenneth A. Hahn 'ranmy R, Hahn 14835 SW 103rd Ave. Tigard, OR 97224 June 29, 1992 This letter is in response tc File No: SUB 92-0007, a request for a subdivision pre,imina:vy plat approval that is scheduled for public hearing on July 13, 1992 at 7 P.M. I am requesting that this letter: he made a part of the written testimony in objection to the preliminary plans as submitted and that it be read by the hearings officer= Specifically, I am opposed to the proposed continuation of 103rd Ave to meet the proposed SW Lady Marion Drive. As a home owner on 103rd Ave I have great ccacerns that extending 103rd Ave will result in a significant inczease in traffic from those who will live in the proposed subdivision and, more importantly, from non- residents who will use 103rd Ave as a feeder street or 'sho .. cut" through our neighborhood. Historically, large numhrirs of non - residents have tried to "cut through" the neighborhood via 103rd Ave only to find that it presently dead ends. The City of Tigard just this year erected a yield sign on Del Monte as it meets 103rd. This has markedly reduced the flow of traffic of non- residents through our neigh- borhood. extending to meet SW Lady Marion Drive would result in alargeincrease in traffic and an adverse change in our nhb impact of living on this no�p eareful , lightly traveled residential street. This in turn will have a negative impact on home values and ,..sake resale of homos more difficult T,7:ere are precedents for making access to SW Lady Marion Drive limited to 100th Ave. The two immediately Marion Drive SW Hood view Drive south o streets �.mnediatel, to .the o.,� the proposed. SW Lady , and SW �+ land 100th Ave, kith Kahle Street,. both only exit onto 10 the future development me of la this plot, SW nt of the plots o, d to the West of t i i Marion Drive can connect with SW 106th Ave and with SW 109th Street. Both of these streets would provide easier access to Pacific Highway. 109th Avenue, which already has multiple apartmelrit complexes and is zoned for more, is better suited as a feeder sstreet than 103rd. AN'e . Every resident of 103rd Ave ]between the prapo8ed s � a site and Murdock Street is against thn proposed extension of 103rd Ave. Please note that none of us abject to the cony traction of the subdivi- sion by ;ter. 1'erd Wardin, just the extension of 103rd Ave. 1 would like to tsu limiting SW ggez�t; that. l�.m�.tin access to the hams on �, Lady Marioxn Drive to 100th Ave will also be attractive to the future, home owners and City of Tigard citizens who 'tiroula undoubtedly be concerned about noon- resident using their street as a "short cut." When we recently purchasOd our home, we know y � neighborhood in `a lightly traveled area where it would l a be this was a major consideration for us . We looked for he iete for our children to playyand ride their bikes A City of Tigard planning official, told one of our r eighbojrs on Wednesday, 7tane 24 that "it makes good planning sense for the City to extend 103rd. /Q He also said he did not think the City would change its mind.' Is that pow government works in Tigard? Do city employees make decisions that affect the lives of Tigard citizens Without concern for wishes of the people who lire in those neighborhoods? when . ta like th4t are made, it feels like decisions hve already been made, prior to a hearing. 1 hope that is not true. From my Perspective it does not make good sense to adversely affect the quality my the value of m hr qusl.it of m» life andl.c► ee to extend y me because on feet. it From 1 oks good to of oity employee d a street a few y point benefit, only harm. Therefore as a citizen of� this ecommunit: 1 strong ly oppose continuing 103rd to meet SW Lady Marion community y pp Thank you Sincerely, .„,4,b,// Kenneth A / ahn Tammy R. Hahn cc Mayor ° All Tigard City Council • LCEIVED NANNING JUL 09 1992 Jerry Offer Staff Planner City of Tigard Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear wig' Offer, Daniel J'. Sheridan Margaret Ann Jozsa 14980 SW 103rd Ave. Tigard, OR 97224 July 8, 1992 This 3mtter is in response to File No: SUB 92 -0007, a request for a subdivision preliminary plat approval that is scheduled for public hearing on July 13, 1992 at 7 p.m. We are requesting that this letter be made a part of the written testimony in abjection to the preliminary plans as submitted and that it he submitted and read by the hearings officer. As Dan discussed with you on the telephone on or about June 25 or �y home y� r 3r Ave that are closest to this 26, 1992, as the ASo�i -r owners on 103rd L�pV �d4:aMr dGAA� 0.i proposed subdivision, we are opposed to the continuation of 103rd p Ave to meet the proposed SW Lady Marion Drive. The first half of this letter addresses what you have assured us we cannot have The second half of this letter is an alternate plan that involves a modest compromise for all concerned parties. We have grey i. concernz that extending 103rd Ave will result in a who will live in the significant increase In traffic from those wh proposed subdivision and, more important, from bon-residents who will use 103rd Ave as a fowler street or "abort ousted through the neigh oorhood Historically, large numbers of non- reai4ents have tried to ®®cut through" the neighborhood via 103rd Ave. only to find that it presently dead ends Just this year after my 9: year old son was struck by a pick up truck in front the City' of erected a dead end street sign at the corner of 103rd and ran of .our house, Tigard, err Del Monte and a yield sign on Del Monte as it meets 103rd. This has markedly reduced the flow of traffic of non -- residents through our neighborhood. The proposed subdivision would change all that. In an ideal world, we would want 103rd AVe. to have a ha, ter head dead end at its present location, e There are precedents for making access J to aSW Lady Marion Drive of p Lady Marion Drive, SW Hood View Drive and SW Ka l limited to 100th Ave. . The two streets i��ed�atel to the soUth the ro �s /y � �.''.��. d SW Ira unto l.O O p � �C' r Street b to. n y exit un a s Avenue. With the fut . ke I.AoV h only development t W loprnent of the plots of lands West of this plot, SW Marion Drive can connect with SW 106th Ave and with SW 109th. s s Would provide easier aoceSS t .�tgee�t . Both of these streets Pacific Highway. 109th Avenue, whieh already has multiple apartment complexes and is zoned for more, is better suited as a feeder street than 103rd Ave., Interconnectedness could be achieved by connecting SW Lady Marion Drive with SW Hood, View and SW Cable when the plot of land to the west is developed. Having stated the above, we understand that for alb practical purposes, the decision to extend 103rd Avenue has already been, made. You stated to ate that the decision to extend 103rd Ave is "a fait de co splet. h You further stated the "decision to extend 103rd Ave was made 30 yeare ago when the Del Monte subdivision was built." Your non - compromising attitude during your telephone conversation has done little to instill any positive feelings into this governmental process that is supposed: to provide for tangible citizen input and participation. Since the decision to extend 103rd Ave has already been made and letters like these from concerned neighbors seen to be nothing more than a charade of due process, we will not waste more of your time asFing for what wa can never have owevere h. ,t-e in the alternate plan that you ae „ed us to cofl - up with that vvou1d be fair to all concerned. A platn that you as oil pa lA city planner, could have helped us to develop if you were not blinded by bureaucratic tunnel vision. Go ahead and connect 103rd Avenue to SW Lady Marion Drive as you have already decided to do. However„ as a City Planner, you have a responsibility to protect the safety of the residents (espy children) who live on and visit residents of 103rd Ave., Del Monte Streit, Murdock, and SW Ludy Marion Drive. You also have a responsibility to protect the integrity of this quiet residential neighborhood. You also have a responsibility to risk decisions and recommendations that protect, the resale value of the homes that have been in the neighborhood for decades. You can, meet your responsibilities by requiring the developer to install three --way stop signs at the following four intersections. 1. Murdock and 103x. °d Ave 2 103rd Ave and Del Nion ee 3. 103rd 3rd Ave ar.,.t SW Larry Marion Dr 1Ve 4 SW Lacy Marion Drive and 100th Ave Present]Ly, one can travel south on 103rd Ave froz MO Donald Street, turn left on Murdock and not encounter a stop sign until 98th Avenue. Or ... you ..... south on 103rd Ave from FlcDonald Street ' �D�LiI can travel s � encounter any This S ®r'tiof�tra traffic 103rd pattern nothing sbt�.n and not encoua front of our house. This p but encourage speeding and short - Cutting through our n ►ighbo:ehood. installlnq this s s riffs,,, you have met the city e s y� errs of Stop :s.�� -� � ,�. �a..,�.�.na� the desire Rfor interconnectedness Ave.. an tr: ets Vhile of neighbors concerns that 103, a.d SW L dd t Marion Drive will bet o me feeder streets an a neighborhood N9 hort cut 0 @ Traffic into th is new sJ divi ion would be primarily l $i ted to residents and th Lr guests. Nol?°®res3adent , short-cutters will not veY'n'tu,re more tanthrough a series of stop signs designed to keep the flow f tr f ec primarily maril y advantageous t o the residents � this quiet neighborho d. This series stop signs will hal � little to no on ewerone responders whose desire for interconnectedness ostensibly is at ti, a root of this debate. Thank you, Sin el,. PROM: Tig td VI. am ing department 1 T a fir' ► °''�1�513 �D'� SUB 52,, ®O I7 J t ®i +r.CONAGLE (WO 6) A reaP'et for acre three.): preliminary nary plat approval to di ride an approximately y 7.76 acre' thr;n a arc i rite into 23 lots ranging between 10,057 7 and 16,876 equare feet P proposed * x phases of a � the subdivision is o sed ,.eo lbe' �e�r ®1�ti. � �.�+ �� thirteen and ten iota. APPLICA L8 1.'° 4Th f1A.r Community Davelaa • r nt Code Chapters 18.48, ,18.88, 18.32, 18.102, 18.144, 18.160, 118.160, 13.164; Comprehensive Plan Policie 2 .1 A 1, 4.3.1, 7.2.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: 15060 SW 100th Avenue c CTM 281 11th, tax lots 1400, 1500, and 2501,) ZONE: R. -3.5 (Re9Lden *ia1, 3.S units//acre) The It --3.5 zoning allows single family .y x7e idantial units, public Support ato►ent hoses, farming, manufactured bourse, a 1ytday caare, home residential occupatiane, testaorary uses, re aid fuel tank. ®, and accessory structazr a among other twee. Attached the Site Plan and various a 1icant s statement g Ifor your review. Free information Supplied b, departments a eenci t and from othe infnrmatio available to our staff, a port and teco ndation will b .. prepare 2 and at decision will. 7416 rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wir h to eoaratent on this application,. we need.: your co me Jam, 1992. You Pay nee the space provi,Ied below or attach a separate letter to return your commente. If eon are unable to e®.. nd b the atiove ._date please phone the staff coz t.. et y your comments in wr Ltir�ag as eon as noted below with f�bi,,,� comment �i and confirm possible., 1f you have any questions regarding thie matter, contact th ,gard, Planning par sent m P0 Soso 23397, 13125 SW Ball 81.vd. , Tigard, OR T tCris. 639,-4172. STAFF CONTACT: ` arr, ; c_f ler PMSASE CHECK TUE roLLowI TG ITEMS THAT AMA? We have reviewed the pr oCod �� and have no 0� l cetion® t o it. Pleaee contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written ntd: ....� .... ,�. . " ... ., w++t e,.M.. ..•...wi:u..rir�a..+.a:uiaiae�. 146100 of P " -mon Commenting: _.12)1LCS Phone Number b /SUB92 -=07 81 M Je r r Offer 1992 TO: � !"ffea� June 22 7, , 9� P Chris Davies, Development Review Engineer O:!. SUB 92 0007 WARDIN/MCMONAGL E Dscton The applicant proposen propose; to divide a parcel of approximately 7.75 acre, three parcel site into 23 lots. The subdivision is proposed to be developed in two phases of thirteen and ten lots Street The site ,is located on the West side of S W 100th Ave approximately 151 north. of the intersection of S.W. Sattier St. S.N. 103rd Ave. and �p proposing to extend S .��. The a l.a.cant is provide q r t west streat4� S. W. Lady Marion ?r. that wouldeo)Inec w thS.W. 103rd Ave. and S.W. 1001,.h A''e. La .yth streets . •e classified as local streets and the appli ant is proposing to construct them to local street standards. The development also fronts on S.W. 100th Ave. which is classified as a local street, Local street standards, fr►1m centerline, include 25 feet of right -of -=way, 17 feet of right-of-way, v rbw and t� approximately iol Currently is ;east, and no cub or sidalk Th applicant is proposing to install half- street in'provements, Itieeti g local street standard$, along the frontage of the development. nt Compreh €nsive Plan Transpo:ation map.. calls for a The. current � to = .. n from 100th Ave. to 09th Ave. With a local street connection '�� interi3ecation at 100th Ave. either at Sattler Street or at a point at least 100 meet from the er .b s �in Sattler St. ntersetiar (SEE NC11 9 on Cam , Tra s p . Map). ENGI N��a�� oNil�TS . s�� 92- 07 WARD1N /MCMONAGLE 1' t� tl4E I a� hW� I tdY 4P Jl,t 1k :t:.k �` `y{1 _� ri a "i._ , "� �4' "� 'r'�- r �. ` �+ ��.12 "� �� -� .+r• w�" ' «r �h �`�u _ elt K ®aic► ar+uw. m.es 1.3.115111•19=4. ,1714170/ This development provides :or this connection and meets the requirement for the intersection at Sattler. The proposed development will extend S.W. Lady Marion Dr. to the west from S.W. 100th Ave to the west 'bc,und ry of the property; the road would be extended to 109th in the future when the adjacent properties develop. The intersection of Lady Marion and Settler, as proposed, i the minimum 100 feet, Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing public sanitary ';le fer system located in S.W. 100th Ave. which bkas the capacity to handle this development. The applicant is proposing to extend the lie to the north and west to serve this development Storm Drainage: The applicant is proposing to connect to the existing public storm sewer system located in S.W. 1 Oth Ave. It appears that the existing system has the capacity to handle this development. The applicant ehou1d be required to submit evidence that the existing system has the capacity to handle this development. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order . 91-47) Surface (Resolution X50 !�I 2 °° water Management Regulations requiring the construction of quality facilities on- site water q y f ` ties or fees in -lieu of their construction. Construct: on of an on-site water quality treatment facility is not appropriate because the site is small compared to the development plan, and the loss Of area for the on-site facility would preclude the effective development. In addition, requiring surface water quality on small sites ... would result in numerous facilities that would becamea maintenance burden to the City. Furthermore, the applicant has nten�ric � City. buarde not proposed any such facilities and there are , _no natural depze ion, her areas of this Site that are p art:iezularly suitable fo��, water ��alit facilities. Regional �, �� or of areas p suitable �` q � facilities, funded x , ' fees S of construction of these facilit e41 would provide the regt iced treatment with improved reliability and less ss maintenance . Therefore the applicant eihould be required to spay the f ae in-lieu of constructing an on -site 1 MGll,7 aER? 1G COMEI : S tB 92 -07 wAIWIN/MC ONAGL �4 Recommendations: ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR, FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON 'COUNTY. • The applicant shall be required to pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewel:age Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first portion is paid with the publi improvements which is for that portion of the development which increase the impervious area wit113,n the public right -of --way. The second is paid at Bui ldin g Permit i suanc e which is for each individual lot . Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engiw ring Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval. An erosion plan l p �' as part of thp improvement co drawings. �, The . plan ros ; a 3 conform to "Erosion Control Plans Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989. ▪ As part of the public improvement plans ny the applicant shall apply for arid provide the necessary information to obtain a "Joint Permitt for erosion cont rol . • A grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and grading contours and typical finished floor elevations on each lot, tcludirig elevations at 4 different Corners of the floor plan tied to the to. of curb elevations as shown on the public, p top improvement plans. The applicant shall demonstrate pp ' rate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainagewayfs without significantly impacting properties downstream. • Full width street improvements, including traffic control clusters, devices, Mailbox concrete sidewalks �� driveway aprons, curbs, asphaltic concrete avement, sanitary s w, , drainage, Streetlights, and underground utilities shall be curbs, st �' installed within the subdivision ENGINEERING CO SOB 92 -U7 WARDIN/MCMONAOLE Yx • . Standard half- street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along the S.W. 100th Ave. frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to local street s,. � g f g standards and �,hal1 conform to the ali alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved by the Engineering Department. 9 . Additional right -oaf -way shall be dedicated to the Public along the S.W. 100th Ave. frontage to increase the right-of-way ti 25 feet from the centerline. 10. The distance between intersections, measured from centerline tc centerlinB, of Settler and the proposed Lady Marion shall be a Fn3.nimum of 100 feet. 11. Construction of the proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department hareviewel and approved the public improvements plans, a street opening permit or construction compliance agreements b executed, execution of a developer-engineer agreement; and payment of all permit fees. 12. The a pp licant sh aa ll make an appointment fer a pr e- construction meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department~ after approval of the public improvement plans but before starting work on the site. The applicant, , the applicant's engineer and contractor shall be required to attend this meeting prior to receiving the approved plans and permits. 13. Prior to the plat being re colr:dea with Washington County the applicant shall provide G. 1 00 perce nt performance assurance or letter of commitment. As an s,lternative the applicant may have the plat recorded after the public improvements have been accepted b y the City y of Tigard and haz posted the a pp rop riate Maintenance Bond. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE, FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE CO. ��.T .. ►'' COMMUNITY DEVIELOFINT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. SECTION 18 ®10 0. 7 0 aprouement A.gt eemer\t . A. Before City approval is certified on the final plate an.. e. p � _ � ' the taruction plans are issued by t.,-he before approved CC�ns City, the Subdivider shall: 11' E' .. r are With a Cit ngziwneer ecu a grad f le an g event th y • speit; �.ng p ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 92 -0i W INS NBC.M .., ®...�AGLE winimismise ..`rmwnvr�. •Ik . Jnclude in the agreement provisions that if such work is not compl ted within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the subdivider. . The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated[ in the Contract SECTION 18.16U.180 Bond d As required by Section 18 ,160.170, the subdivider shall file with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: I. An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon' 2 surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remains in force until the surety company is noti&ed by the City in Writing that it may be terminate l or 3. Cash, The subdivider shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, certified by a re •istered civil engineer: to assist the City gnginec r in calculating the amount of the performance assurance. The Subdivider shall not cause termination of char allow expiration of said guar .,t'itee without having first secured Written authorization from the City. Filing and Recording' Within 60 clays of the City review and approval r the applicant shall ` st��air�it the final p�.ac to the County for signatures of County officials as required by ORS Chapter 92. B • Upon final recording with the County, the applicant shall, submit to the , City a zuylar copy of the recorded final.. plat' w ENGINEERIN( CO SUB 92-07 WATN/MCMQaAGU • - • • 'A A SECTIO 18.162.080 Final Plat. , pr.)1i.6‘:!Ation Submis6On Itequi.reiverit.s A. 'I'firee copies of the partition plat prepared by a land Eurveyor licert.sed to practice. in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the mi,rtimum standards set forth by the Oren Revised Statute g (ORS 92.05)/ Washington Courity„ and blr tile City of Tigard. 5,. • SECTION 18.162.110 Centerline VIOnUrrientatii5h 1,10nument BoX Requirement • • A.', Centerline 7,4onumentati.on for all , MajOr Pa.ttftiotis: 1. The centerlines of all street and roadway way shAll be monuMented as prescribed in ,,.1.0"AS 92.060.(2) before 'City ,acceptance of . street improvements under the following 8130dif.'3Cation.S:' a. Centerline monuments are reqUi.red to have monument boxes conforming to City Standards Set for those monuments within the paVettierit area and b. The tops of all monument boxes shell t)e set to finished pavement grade. lEs. 18.164.120 Utilities 1. All utility lines including, but nOt.,,, 1mited to those required for electric, comrounicata,con,,,..lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed. ;undergroutid.,, except for 'surface mounted transformers, surface bunted potAriectibri, boxes and meter cabinets which may be pL.ed above, ground, temporary 'utility service fadilitie8, during construction, high capadity eleotrie lines peating at 50,000 volts or above. C. i8164.i3O Cash or Bond Reqireci i Alifi.ittiptolteteht$ instailed by the subdiiide shall be guaranteed .48: to-Wcitkman6hip4h0 period 'o one year .fti1lowl.h4,4tddeptoill,ce by tie Cit • r t ' 814GINEERIliG COtIm.8NTS: SUB 92-07 tp/1..I.RDitt/t4CMONAtIlig • I • be secured by. cash deposit or Such amount of guarantee shall b bond in the amo *.u- improvements the value of the improvements set by the City Engineer. The Cash or bond Shall' comply with the terns and conditions of Section 18.160.180 18.164J150 Installation: Prerequisite /Permit Fein .. No land division improvements, includ ng sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be : undertaken except after the plans therefor have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and Permit issued. 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City as been notified in advance. 2. If work is discontinued for any reason, it steal;,; not i be resumed until the City is notified. 18.164.200 Engineer's Certification Required 1. The land . divider s engineer shall provide written certification of a form pr1 ')vided by the City that all improvements, workmanship , and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction struction pr actices , and are of hi g g.: r_ ade v p r :,o r the Cit y acce p tance of the subdivision' s imp rovements or an y portion thereof for operation and maintenance. APPROVED: Randall R. Waole C ty nine :ar Cb: sub92 -0 7 . C ENGINEERING COMMEt.'S St i3 92° =0'1 51'1/ c OMAGlJ •.p: 410 r RECEIVED PLANNING JUN 1.5 1992 blei "ao DATE: Jane 8 199 aOM: Tigard Planning Department SUBDXVISION sib 92 - ®107 �Wd 1:�d,�M i A�% (NPR #6) A request for Subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide an approximately 7.75 acre, three parcel site into 23 lots ranging between 10,057 and 168 875 thirteen and ten lots. � ' to be d ®�rel�r d in two kaase® of square feet. The sdivAPPLICAiLErREVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18.48 18.80, 18.92, 18.102, 18.144, 18.150, 18.160, 18.1641 CcrmprehensiVe Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.3.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATIONS 16060 lW 100th Avenue (WCTI.1 291 1108, tax lots 140t, 1500, and 1501) ZONE: 14.-2.5 (Residential,, 3.5 units /acre) The R 3.5 zoning allows single family residential 'units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, home occupations, temporary uaea, �nfactured homes, fuel taxers, a t and accessory structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's otatement for your review. Brom information supplied by ;carious departments ents sand agencies and from other Information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decieten will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you *Fish to comma on this application, we need your comments by June 18, 1992.. You May use the egna.:e provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. I . yau are unable to reapon4 bxthe _ above date . please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as anth possible. If ve e x questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard 397, .13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, cA 9722. PHONE: 63q.04171. lUEST FOR coisminis STAFF CONTACT: Jerry offer PLEASE ("TICECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 4e have reviewed the proposal an& have no objections to it Pleaere contact of our office. IMO Please refer t?; the enclosed letter. Written Courentn O .1111..., 0.4100040I4 I010000.0mmosuontra\• . 1111. 1111 1111 _� 1111 1111_ 1111. 1111.,... odY�tlw��•p.1� 1111 1111_.. 1111 1111... 1111 1111. 11 1111 1111 �YO� �YY1 _1111 _ 1111 A�� 1111'1 Nurse el Person rot Ting s .' Phone Nu ber s bictil SV 52e07.8KH s. 1111 1111 _ � ■y rd Hibbard Administration Center 13137 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tel, (503) 620 ,-1626 Fax (503) 684 -2296 City of Tigard Jerry fifer /Planning Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear INS. Offer: In response to your request for comments on the development Marion Estates (92°0007) located South of Murdock by 100th Ave,, the ;attached is submitted as a statement of impact. in cereiy, LEGIBILITY STRIP TIGFIRD—TURIFITIN SCHOOL DISTRICT 234.1 EITYZEDUNTY BESIDENTIIL IMPRET STFITEMEN ' Development Marion Estates Date 6/10/92 Number of Units: Single— Family 2 Multi — Family Intermediate (T a_lity Mid. h-.) Ii [2] [31 [41 School : Current Impact_ of Design Actual Available Prior Approval Ca 4 act' Enrollment Ca a d .- Develo meets 510 609. -99 79 7 ESTIMATED AT 900 8S0 50 1, 27 3 I�Iigh School: Tigard Sr. Higil) Status of School Impact [5] [6 Impact of . Adjusted School this Capacity Re Develo meat (Suva of columns 2 4 Sc e` -92 ESTIMATED AT 1465 1 400 Se —92 65 94 1496 For explanation of columns 1 through 6, see code on back sheep School(s) ?, not exceeded (column 6 lessthoi column 1) School(s) capacity exceeded - -core facilities are sufficient to consider portable additions Sufficiency determined by requirements of Uniform Building Code and /or City County codes. School(s) capacity exceeded- -ogre facilities insufficient to consider portable additions. Additional capacity may be provided, by other options under consideration by the School District which include � .z grade 'level_ reconfiguration; rescheduled school year, boundary adjustments, double shifting, busing to under — utilized facilities, future bond measures leading to new .construction, ,and other housing options. ese options- andstaterments have been prepared by Tigard—Tualatin School District Administration Staff and approved: by the Board of Directors. - Th,is school impact statement is for the above indicated-development, and is valid. for 120 days. Signed:- Bud Hillman Director of Operations and Transportation ( 684 - 2221). LEGIBILITY STRIP IMPACT STATEMENT CODE Column i School capacity reflects the number of classrooms, portables portables on site, and Special Education program accomodations at an individual school' Column Column 3 Column. 4 Column ° 5 column 6 Actual current school enrollment- kindergarten has been computed at one-half. Current available capacity-difference of column 1 arid column 2. Impact of previously approved developments determined by School District housing formula (see School District Housing Formula shown below) Impact of requested development - Determined by School District housing formula. Adjusteed school capacity requirement - determined by the sum of columns 2,4 and 5 and places developmental request in A, B or C category. � ! " HOUStPI6= FORMULA 0.48 Pre first grade children per dwelling 0.32: Elementary students per dwelling. 0.14 intermediate students per dwelling. 0.07 High school students per dwelling 0.53 T otnl° school age students per dwelling 0.07 Elementary students per dwelling 0 ..03 intermediate students per dwelling 0.0 High school students per dwelling 0.12 Total school age students per dwelling SCHOOL DESIGN. CAPACITY CURRENT ENROLLMENT MENi' AS OF 5/29192 Tigard High School 1465 1652 Tualatin High school 1 465 UNDER CONSTRUCT IO ! Fowler Junior High 900 , 984 Twality %un :ior Nigh 900 1049 Hazel brook diddle Sch.. 800 UNDER CONSTRUCTION CF f Elem.. 570 516 Mary Woodward Elem. 600 ` 760 Durham Elem. 375 = 381 Templeton Elem. 510 609 Metzger Elem. 550 528 Phil Lewis Elero. 500 451 Byrom- Elem. 600 65Z- Tualatin Elem. 600 - 640 Bridgeport Elem. 600 757 TOTAL 8 t 70 8979 'S. 2,9111_111gL IMUEST FOR COBS ebet DA: 8 1912 RECEIVED RANKING JUN 1, 5 1992 FROM: T.i garil Planning Department a SUBT4VISION I BD pca iag ®an # ) A r for Sudivia ion preliminary p la approval' to divide an approximately 7 acre, three parcel site into 23 lots ranging between 10,057 and 16,875 square fast. The subdivision is proposed to be developed Community in t two phases p of thirteen ad ten lots. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA. Code Chapters 18 48, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18.144, 18.150, 18.160, 18.164; ' Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.3.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: b, 15060 SW 100th Avenue (WCTM 251 11CS, tax lots 1400, 1500, and 1501) ` ONE: R -3.5 (Residential, 3.5 unite /here) The R-3.5 moning allows single family residential units, public support farming, manufactured homes, family day care home occupations, treatment temporary uses, residential fuel tanks, and accessory structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered or #be proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, way nd your comments by June 18, 1992. You may use the space provided below or at a separate letter to return your coriente zf yes ere , mi ae to respond by •t_ love date; please phone the staid contact noted below with your comments an coefirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard g Department, HONE: P639-4171. annrn 08 artaaernt: P� fox. 23397, 13125 5�1 Hall Blvd., lid. , �R 992 e PHONE: STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Crf f enr PLEASE CHECK K THE FOLLOWING ITEMS TEAT APPLY:, XXXXwe have reviewed the proposal and have ne objections to it. Please contact , of our office. Please zefeb to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Pereatn Commenting Phone Number .2 44 9 b /s92 *t7 a Bites 4e_ � MA • „y. koramenalsomemmansommormossaAraelor e DEBT FOR COMENT DATBse. 8 192 ... �.►%L �� l r pJ Tigard Planning Department S"'iTgra uSEI ®Ai _ SUS 92-000 �i TN /MCHONAGLE (NPt) #6) A request for ,subdivision el a inary plat, Approval to divide . an approximately ;x . 75 acre, th ree parcel site into 23 lots ranging between, 10,057 and 16,875 square feet +, The subdivision is proposed to be deimits: po in two phase` of thirteen and ten lots. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:, C, nity Development Code Chapters d 8r4B/ i 8.88/ 18. 92, 13.102, 18.144, 18.150, 18.160, 18.a64; 7.4.4, Comprehensive . Pll an Policies 2.1.1, 4.3.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: 15060 SW 100th Avenue (WCT it 281 110E, tax lots 1400, 1500, and 1501) 201E: R-3.5 . (1 eaidential, 3.5 snits /acre) The R -3.5 soninr allows single family residential units, public support facilities, ��a d ential treatment homes, Bing, m srufactured hoes, family day care, home occupations, temporary residential fue l tanks, and acceaeory structures among other uses. ?Attached i® thLi Site Plan and applicant's ' and �v� w. other ,, app statement for your , information supplied 'various departments and agencies and recommendation will be prepared information available to our staff c a report a � If you wish and a decision will be rendered on the p,�opo ®inl in the nea. , , future. to cent on this applir.» ..tion, we need your Comments by unl;: 18, 1992. you may use the space provided below or attach a separ•te letter to return your comments. If ...you ou .. are utnalb1e ,�, o res nd by the Jaove date ieaea phone the staff contact _ r c m matter, contact, the Tigard as noted � b�sl! ow with your comments and �o��firm your comments in writing as soon possible. If you have any questions regarding this . tier, 97223. . PHONE: an Planning Department, PC Box 233 97, 13125 SW hall 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: J Lattp . PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: proposal and have no objections ns to it. We have revised the pro ,o ectio Please contact of our of fide. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: ..... .:... 41.+ Name of Verson Commenting: Phone N� ember a bkm /8.'1892 -07 NKN A TO: GeArteir -_. RECEIVED PL NNiNC OueST �R COMMENTS Diaz: s X 992 SUN 1l 1 °-? . (®M: taa and Planning Department SUBDIVISION Subdivision preliminary }7LEi r 2�7 t1N,lM ®iRL (1416) A rarest for wr plat approval to divide an a sprox ,metely 7.75 alr , three parcel site into 23 lots ranging between 10,057 and 36,875 square feet. The subdivision is proposed to be depel d in tyro ; gamma of d lets. RE REVIEW CRITERIA :► Community Dev l nt 'thirteen any germ �PpLa�C,�B Code Chapters 18 048, 18.88, 10.92, 18..E 2, • 8.144, •18.150, •18.160, 180164; Cmprshettns e Plan Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1, ,7.4.4, 7.6, 01, i ic�.e�s 2.1.10 4.3 ..�. r 8.1.9 , and 8.1.3. LOCATION: 15060 SW 100th Avenue (I CTM 251 1108, :tamer lots 1400, 15004i and 1501) ZONE: , R-3.5 (Residential, 3.6 units /acre) The R--3.5 waning allows single family residential units, public suwrt fra�ac lit .eaanl, residential treatment houses„ farming, manufactured hems, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, residential fuel tares, and accessory structures among other uses.. Attached is the Site Man and applicant's statement for your review. Zeroes information supplied by various depa rtnae .i s and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a deci®ion will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish u®® the pace �rovi application, below or attach a your eparate letter to return your cosy: You te. �mente d Iyos xe un 3a � ftv® date please phone the staff contea c noted below ��iiLl your comments and confirm your comaent° in writing «e non as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department). ac�1.� � Box 233�� 93]2S 8� Hall Blvd., Ti gard, 0,1 9722 3. a PN0 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offex PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: sononessermemammsossatewleerom Name of Person Co M enting Phones Number"; 100-. bhm/SUB92-07.BKM J33NP:)N3 DATE: June 8 1992 JUN 18 1992 ROMe Tigard Planning Department SUBDIVISION SUB 92. -0007 W ' NLM agNAg1L8 (NPO O6) A request for Subdivision sion preliminary plat approval to divide an approximately 7.75 acre, three parcel, site into 23 lots ranging between 10,057 and 16,875 square feet. The oubdivi ®ion is proposed to be dePreloped in two phases of thi;a°teen and ten lots. APPLICABLE P4 IMW CRITERIA :, Community "D& ve1op i ent Code Chapters 18.48, 18, 88, 18 . , 18.102, 18.144, 18.150, 18.160, 18.164; C r prehew Lvo Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.3.1, 1.1.2 a 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, lots 1400, 1500, and 1.5�i1 � o ZONE: i�. -3.5 100th Avenue QN'0TH 281 11C8Rr tam 8.1,.1, and 8.1, 3. LOCATION: 15060 SW 10D (Residential, 3.5 unite/a ) The Rv 4 , 5 zoning allows single family residential unit, public support t faollLtik.:91, residential treatment homes, farming, manui aaetured homes;,, family day care, home occupations, temporary WEIGE3 ,, residential fuel tanks, and accessory structures among oti.o,her uses. rsttached is the Site Plan and applicant's statemena° for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other ,nformat3 on elvailab1e to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared Arad a decision will be resxdered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on the applicadion, we need your comments by June 18, 1992.. You may use the space provided be1Oaar be attach a separate letter to return your commits. If ou are bl,,e3 to r .z...1 m_.ncilvt the above dates„ please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, ' OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT= Serry Cf fe PLEASE CHECK WE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY XX We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of Our office. Testis td der to the enclosed Letter. Written Co es ate d The Water District has no olbe5tio8 to the pxoprsedi develame.n provided the Developer under stands that the existing 6" :C.1 Watery main supplied by the pressure booster station on SW Canterbury Ln,) must' be kept in servic' at all times to serve the existing homes alihng SW Hood View Dr which is south of the proposed development. As with all developments water main size and location,ins;ludinq Name of Person Comment ti.ng: Michael Ntz].ler�, 1�nc�ineering Tech. alb, Phone Number bibs/ sUB92 ,97. Bird water meters, Will: lbe -rev ewred and approved though the Water i strict •Firial approval of fire hydrant locations till` he eo�ordinated *�v tYn Gene F3i'i chi. i of !ualatin Vallei' Fire & Fescue thre ugh the Water Dist 'ic t . • N IO ,oQUts pit t ATE PROM: gard Planning D ent �� an z RFC . LOT, LINB ADJr1THENT__,MIAL.21-0008 DAV W ENS Pnl,°7.''F2,S! (NPO #5) A n:equemt for Lot, Line Adjustment apPralra 1 to adjust foram- cele of approximately 06, 910, 235,550, 249, 163, and 13,939. q e feet into three .. .Parcels of a roxl atel 206,910, 225, 5410 Y 9531 square feet tsi pective ly.° • APPLICABLE ,;R3V),, TERIA ► tnnit'a� Davy ,4s)paaent Code !action 18.162 LOCATION: 15055 Sig Sequoia y `� "' � h`�kwa 4 251: 12DA, tax lots 600 And 700) ` and 15155 SW Saga xo.ia Parkway (WCTM 281 12DD, tam lots 1600 . - P axone alicwe public agency adianiat at a services, public support rt The facili tiOa, prtfessional, and administrative services, finandiaaal, inauranc00 real kIstate, andl busi support cervices, manufacturing of ,Ei niahe roduct as 9i e 9 a.:4 processing, p3nd wholes le atorigl ad distribution among ther uses. z riiew. If you wis►a to c nt on thi app1icat�. 4^�• appeal thi dos Your Plan, applicant u statement, �- r i�iion, e need your commeato by June . 29 1952. . A t vin a a . rse un tl.e to piAm s Y' ' Y ate . please phone staff contact noted belo with your eai ants and tonf irb �our cents in wriwin 9 ne soon as If you have a ny eaticnn regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Departnrtent, BOx 23197, 13125 SW 'Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT:`ictor _Ail ®, PLEASE CHECK TEE P0LLOWIN3 ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have revii wed the proposal elid have no objections to Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: oPisma,01O�aY1�1�M112N Aa...... s... a+ w l.u:n.u..........+aewlw... ... M, -... .....��:u...na.o it y,p Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: O A r— w s� «ECE %VED P!A ING ,� e """JUN � 9 1�y2 JUii21992` TOs iA -C ILK( 1 10",S., DATE: June 8 1992. FROM: Tigard Planning Depari re . RE: S!l 3D1VISi9E SUE 92-0M WA1iDaN 14 ONAGLE (NPO #6) A request for Subdivision preliminary plat approval ranging an' approximately 7.75 acre, three parcel site between 10,057 and 1r41,875 square itaet. The subdivision is propotzed to be date /aped in two phases of thirteen and ten lots. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code cbatpl:c■r'a 18.48, 18.88, l'A.92, 18.102, 18.144, 18.150, 18.160, 18.164; comprehtt,neive Plan PoliCie M 2.101, 4.3.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. Y TIQN: 15060 SW 100th Avenue (WCTM 281 llCB, tax lots 1400, 1500, and 1601) ZONEit ? ,.3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units/acre) The R -3.5 zoning allows eiz gle faun ly cestidential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured i'o a, family- day care, home a4D aupatione, temporary uses, resiaentia1 fuel tanks, and acceaeory structures amolV other uses. AttatUhed is the Bite Plan and appIicant,a statement for your review. Thom information supplied by variou8 oisri artmenta and r, genciea and from other information and � decision will available to rendered aonrthc� proposal d1.n recommendation will be �eg�arad report the near future. If you wish to comment on this applicatiai, we need your comments by June 18,, 1902. You may uae��the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. 7t�i YYa.tif are unable to _zee nd_ .the. breve .cateti, please phone the staff contact noted below with your cements - nd confirms your COMMOTIte in writing as noon a la possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter', contact th�� Tigard g,. s 639-41710- 4 13125 SW Hall lEalvd p , a�'i an'd,� OR 97229 b PROM Planning Department, � 23397, 131 STAFF OONTAC . s e ,v :offer PL! ! HEC X T "OLL0 WING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the props al and haVa no oblectione to it. Please ,. ontatz:t of our office. Ploaee refer to the eincloned letter. Wr, rtten Comments: r....rF : iron. �...e...�.�r5.•.r.i�:.....+...r ar. .a∎a+lI , iiww "i��w�•t.iommo.eemwommeraa.r.+.....' .:.... ..,.. Name of Peron commenting: ry , r.heine Ni M per 3 .19L. blsm/'sui92 --07. DEN enr* RECEIVED PLAIiNNING JUN 1, 111992 DATE: June 8• 9 2 ?alvi Tigarcc Diass:arm Department a SUBDIVISION 92.0;q9/ WAI DIN McMONiv`g (N »0 ,; *6) A .requea~ for Subdivision preli arinan:r plat approval to divide an approximately 7.75 acre, three parcel sit into 23 Iota ranging betty en 10,057 and 16,875 thirteen and ten lots. APPLICABLE VIEW c XTT' t a Community in two pusses of � p � e da�e� R�,ora�,+aanity i�evelnpnteat square feet. The subdivision i;� rQ wed to b e . 92 ,: .8.102 7 . 18.160, 18. 164; Code Chapters 18.480 ��,� 88 , policies 18. ,118 � i,44 s b� 33 bl, i 7.4.4, '� . 6.1, ��1, andt� .1 3. CT N. 2.1.1.!. osa SW 100th Avenue �4 r�► �., and, �» :Ra. � (Residential, °�8�. 11�, tax late 1400, -150 0, and 1501) ZONE: 1 , 3 6 units/acre) The R -3.6 zoning allows single family reeidontial units, ts, publi^ ►a p facilities, residential treatment homes, tarsi: 19, manufezcured homes, family day cane, home occupations temporary uses, residential fuel tanks, acid acae3sd ry structures among other usGer. AttaChed lew the Site Plan and apP lic and "e statement for ;your review. From information Suppliei by various vey►artments and agen - see and from other information available to our staff, a report and reeome dation will be prepared '.,� proposal r future. 1ff you wish to ~conda�nt on this application, we zti.,� �i your comments by pine 18, 1992 a You may LeiI c�ae are unable to xeo mine �ov«�p� ate letter t�� return your _�Cnt ®. a space provided be ► or attach te a _..,daAR& please phone the staff contain: noted below with your r,:ornments and confirm your commente in writing s loon a � possible. If you Have any questions regarding ing t Cis ratter, coi tact ti; *e Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 233970 13125 SW V• .11 ilvd. , Tigard, OR 97223. PRONE: 639.-4111. STAFF CONTACT: li'LEASE CHECK TEM PULLOWING ITEMS TEA'S APPLY: We haver reviewed the pray ._ j on®' to it. p�'i ®al and ha�,�ar .: -� ob. ecti Please contact ,.. , of our of'f ice e Please refer to the enc .owed letter. Written ,,,,4 ant a IYI.TJ:seasUomi ew.�. raw +gala++'•.r "��:uGss•�1k. rises. errs. s:iW.J+tar.lsarwt'uw�,c.�.u..mu Blame of Person dommenting o r"-ZAZ-A44.5 . `fir • °�1,'L.x . phone isit$tober a � l - b n /SUB92 —(iii. B b d ti•• gi To GrAA ,,_,_,� MTH a -42 0.2.-0 ` 1492 PROM: Tigard Planning Department REe 8aB IVtgat SU8 92 7 A�DI$L M NAG to (NPO #6) A request fo, Subdivi ion Preliminary plat approval to divide an appr0;,cifmate .y 7.75 acre, three parcel site into 23 Iota ranging between 10,057 and 1E, 8714, square feet. The Su bdivis on is Pro Posed to be developed .1,n two phases thirteen and ton lots. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: coain urity DeveloPmemt f Code (hat*' -!1 18.48, 18 68, 18.92, 18.102, 18..144p 18.1510 18.160,, 18.164; Goc�► %�;nt; ° . k .� Plan Policies 2.i.1, 4.3.1, 7.1.2, 7.3 „1, 7 n4.4 �.G7.6.1, � Lc�ATa�a� � � demtirll 3.5 uni 8.1« '�, and 8.1.3 a 15060 SN 100th lots 1400, 1500, and 1501) ZONES a't- 3.5 Reaidnnt ��.� 5Bu lts /acre) The R-3.5 Zoning allows *Angle family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day cars, home oCOs a one, towp ra rY lamas residential fuel tance, and a:ceaeory structures ail►ong other uses. Attached La the Site Plata and appdepartments nta ea n agencies u review. From 3nformatiO t supplied by various � g from other � nforrnatio�,\ available to our staff, a re Port and recommendation will be prepared PP 3C amend a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment On this application, we nee d your cacnents by Juta 8, 199 2. You may uee the ®aco provided below or attach a eeparate letter to return Your comments. I r are u► ab1.e to respond by t ae _abov ®rate, please phone the staff contact noted k`re1ow z ith your comments and confirm Your comments in writing as soon as po If You have any question°► regardic�g this matter, contact the Tigard aeningg. p , 13'? 25 SW Hall 81' d. , Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. P Ae �►n��±ent, P� eoac 233��', STAmer CONTACT: ,^ 'err Offer PLEASE CHECK TUE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT MPPLY a We have reviewed the props ®a,1. ,end have no objections to it. Please contact of our office, /�P ,Oaee rofer to the enclo, ed letter. Written Counent a a hr. Na Na510 of Person coMmenting: .... , r... -., Phone Number: bk n/SU842.07 a 8th ^l dawn, .!N I • •O . a SUB92- OOO 0 A demolition permit will be required for removal, of , e.zLstixag house. he septic tank shall be pumped out and complet,ely,,l'elkove. An inep►ect ,on shall be obtained after the tank is removed. A copy of the receipt from the pumping company &h2.1 be provided. f the Building is connected to the public sewer, the line sh ill be properly capped-off, and inspected by the city. A Se Itra,V permit shall be obtained prior to the connection of the existing house to the sanitary sewer. o Private et,Orm' drains shall be provided as l have indicated on the :tor z , easements shall p► ,rrt. . � provided where crossing plank lets 9 e .l 1 -19 1 be �ov� other lots The minimum pipe size of a pr ° vate rain drain shall be as allows: Serving � � �- in 1 house 3 inch Serving 2 houses 4 inch Serving 3-6 houses 6 inch Serving 7-15 houses 8 inch A joint access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded with tzlaoh lot accessing a private storm drain. As foiiow ll scats: lelj. shall have an equal right to use and an obligation to operate and maintain the private dx4a.lna: a facilities within the private or public drainage easements an Shawn o A lan shall be submitted to the building i •l:ding division, tzhc►iring the location of all underground private utilities for the existing building. 1 "f they cross over new property lines, they, shall be provided with easements Rain dxai.ns shall discharge to an approved system. Building Division •'" tti :PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SUS FILE WA IN APPLICANTS Ford Waxdin P.O.Box 310 Newberg, OR, 97 132 92 -0007 OWNER:. SAME A request for Subdivision preliminary plat appr ral to divide an approximately 7.75 afire, three parcel. site into 23 lots ranging between 10,057 and 16,875 square feet. The pubdi„vieion .is proposed to be developed in two pilules ,cf thirteen and ton lots PLIL9' . ,�1'7�i� ]CTE1IxAa Community Development Code Chart.ara 18.48, iB„ ®ito 18.92; 16.102, 18.144, 18.150, 18.160, 18464; and Coitpraheneirre Plan Poliaies 2.14, 4.3.1, 7:1 2 7.3.1, 7,4:4, 7.6 .1, X8 LOCATION: 46860 SW 100th Avenue (WCTM 231 11C3, tax lobs 1400, 1500, and 1501) ZOtata R -3.5 (Residential, 3.5 unite per acre) The R-3.5 zoning allows single family reoident.ial, public support faci.li.tied, resident Lai. treatment home farming, anan factur,red home, 'fit day home occupation, ... fi,l a3a Dare, n temporary nee, resident a.al fuel tank, and accessory structures, NPO no: 6 CHECK ALL Min:1 APPLY: STAFF DECISION COMMENTS DUE HACK_ TO STAFF . ON PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGS OFFICER CITY COUNCIL 1991 DA''E OF gint.P.raGt ; TIME:Log DATE OF HEARING: ZINE� b DATE OF $fEARIfi1G,p ...�.:.: Tit!!E a' j 30, E P �I�1 S `A F. IC (.,,:TY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 6"39 -4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATIO N PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATIO1 . Me AND TAX LOT NO. 2 ‘,5-1—//C0 SITE 512E 7,2,5",41-e: ? PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* 1 4-6 5edal G eo..ed (4o 1✓4e5' . y ADDRESS fle5 . 1 .+Z4 PHONE 62.9/ CITY APPLICANT*�� ADDRESS PHONE CITY ZIP eetwomorzoom *When the owner and the applicant are diffrent people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in p Ossession with written, authorization from the . owner or .an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page twO or submit a written authorization with this application. FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE N0.a OTHER CASE NO s w r RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED ID nx: DATE: 5. /: /92- Application elemeeto oubmitted " ,, (A) Application form (1) B) Owner's signature/written authorization (C) Title transfer instrument (1) (1) Aseess '' (1) E) Preliminary Plat (pre -app checklist) '101' F) Applicant's statement (pre-app checklist) n 1;',.5r,t77'.(ii) Filing fee (415 Pies5 per lot) DATE DTi TERMIW D TO BE COMPLETE: 2 PROPOSAL SUMARY The owners of record of the subject property request permission to divide a (Total Area parcel into lots between (number of lots) N.P.O. Mumbei: Preliminary:'' )Plat Approval Date Fi al Appt'oval Date: Planning Engineering Recordi g late and '�T1amber: • List any variance, planned Davz lop eut, Sensitive, Lands, Or other land. use � to b this a `plicati y� actions to considered as a�. y t o r t • Applittnte: To have a conpiatr`c npplicatiOn you will need to brabbit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time son anbr*it this *ppli cat 1 cu. • Tg• 11.4cAT (S) . SWIG CERTIFY THAT The above re rest does not violate an deed restrictions that ma' be attached ix' ' � 3� me n _n t a ub ect x eIrt .., . If the application is granted, the epplicant. ; will exercise the rigts granted,.: i i 'aecordOnce with the term; a^ 4 subject to all the conditions and limitations oaf the approval. . All of the above statementa and the state entid, °4 ff , the plot plan, attaehmente, and exhibits ` transmitted herevithb are true, .and . the applicants so ac nOw1edge` that any Peti4t Issued/ based` on this applications may be revoked if it is found thllt, ..any such ctateaenta are false. pp. , including • The applicant . 1naa read the entire contents of requirement's for approving nds �1a q pp the polities and criteria, and understands or denying the application. DATED this daY of SIGNATURES of each owrie,,. (eg. husband and wife) eaf the subject p 'ope" ' ty. AI LINT Al I ;a�a .. ........... ..J+ ...: ,,C'..::..d i...�w ".ter PROJECT OVERVIEW FOR MARION ESTATES May 15, 1992 EXISTING CQNDX t XQNS. 1. The site is located on the West side of "S.W. 100th Ave. approximately 150 North of the intersection of S.W. Sather Street The property if„; also situated between the subdivisions of Hoodviaw and pelmonte No . 2 • The site is comprised of tax lots 1400, 1500 and 150. as shown on tax map 2S- 1- -1i,'S ▪ TI entire site is zoned R-3 which requires 10,000 square foot lots. There is an existing Tigard !' Wate ` District line which cros4 s the property opposite S.W. 103rd. Ave. There is an existing ting.' storm drainage Pipe that dx'a.i.ns the cxi titct enct of S.W. 103rd Ave. and runs along the norther? y boundary of this property. ▪ Street access w will be provided from S. W. .00th and .W. 103rd Ave, as shown. The East .:pan half of the site is generally open and is covered With field grak.a, EA few scattered fruit and nut trees, a plant nursery and an older home that will remain on the site The Western Portion of the site consists of an existing house that will be removed and fir trees that range in size from 8- winches to 30 - inches. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 1. The site is within N.P.O. 5 and conforrs to the neighborhood plan and tranaportat.on plan . The site will be developed in conformance with the exist O . s zoning into 23 lots ranging in size from 10,000 s.f. miriintum to : 15,875 s.f. more or. less. 3. The existing stor'm drainage and water line systems will he routed into the development system as shown. The stores drainage system along s. W. 103rd AvOb. will be extended to the project boundary. 4. The sanitary sewer Will be extended from the existing mariho1 at the intersection of S.W. 103rd and S tt] er Street across thhe S , . 103rd frontage through to the frontage of the sites and throt� �► the deve projects boundaries The older home and the majority of t 'le fr. a to rtut eastern portion of the site will remain, the ex ,st .n►g'nursery' W be removed. The fir trees on the western portion" of the 'site tn, are affected oy the .roadway oonStru tion will . be removed .flue to the large lot sizes a large majority of the tree till' retain on the buiding sites. o1a access, lots 1 through 7 and 10 through 2A Meet e so cress requirements. The Orientation of lots` 8i' and 0 are controlled by the location of S.W. Delntonte ';Ave e The do !,e , calls for ':80 percent of the lots to be solar access lots. when possible,' 91 percent of the kits in this ' project comply with.'` the . cads = A l l public 'actlities will , be constructed ,to. tie o, ,ty of Tigard standards. LEGIBILITY STRIP` U) V BASIC REQUIREMENT LOTS' F SOLAR- LINE. LOTS. H •N ...• ORIENTATIO ••ca•NUw•••w•�a••NN• �(� . .NNSNNN•N•NNNN Maljaffire .: _ _ ,• NN••••••u•w•e•••cN EXEMPT LOTR'' ••• u••)NHU •••N•Nb•M ,...N..... ••nw•••NwH••K.•.•••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• A t •.•.. •m•cK•us••NU•H•••M• ..f.N,.N•,...K,o1. . ` .K,N.N�... «. N...tl•.M.....�..�NNK..N..Na ` • k- •. ..�.. • ,,....a...*0 ,Tf� •( { ••KM•••un•+�ssrM•.w: /3 70 -457° I i __ - • Nw:• ••••••N•*NN•N• ............• . •H•M•Ntl•N•N :•• "7"- ` •NN • ^N •b NH N ••••J•••••••�I. � M / / �o•• •• �- • .•. N . •N•. • • ••••N•N•N••••H• • 6 Y it ••w• ••H•N•S fNN®••••H•NN • •••N N•01•• ■•••• •N•••••• 00000 NNON••••N• •HW•• •N•fVifNNN••fNN•NN•N••K •fw•• •••••w•••••••w• . ••••••KN•••••wb• tNNN••- •N]N•NN••N•• . N•• • N•N •N•• •NN•• • •Hw• •NN•••• M. H•HN•H ta•N•M• ••••• N•N u•••f••'x•• • ••M .•b••••w•M•N•••N•••••••••..1" •••NH••NN•M•N•••••••iN••N 1•••NNN• Na•••••••••••••NUM NM•••••NNOON•N • H1NN•e 0•N•N••••xNNNiNNNH •NNNNN•N.HNJN••uH•NHN••N•MNN•N• •••1NN•K•N•MN•W -w ..•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •NNb N•N••••b••••••••N •••••••■••il••••••• a•bHMNaH•bNMNNN •NO•tN•a•!�b•••WN••f•• t•NNN•N•••• ••• if••••••••MI•••.• ••'• -.. - .. . pNK - -_. ZG. t /3 V .1.. • MN•••••• •NW • N•• ••••••••\••••••••••••••••• •••••••,••••• • •11141,••••••••••••• I•N a•K •os••••s ••.MU ••••••••••••••t••••••••••••••••••• - ••••••N•••�••••l••••• N•N•N•••••O•N• ••••NN•• • •WHN•NNM •N•••00•••••••••••••••••••• NNNN • •N N ._ ••NN•N N• .••NOON• _ -- N•N•••N• •••••••••••••••• •N•a•N•N•••N•N•• • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •NNNN••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• NH= •+N•••••N•MN• NN••NNwM •a•••••••••••••••••■• ••.••t•.i•NNM•w••NN• • NNF:••••M•N••w•••M• ••••.w.••»t.:w••••••••w• M•••■e•••••••••• M • N. NNNN••••wNNNHN•••N••NW••• {•••e • MN•••••N••w•NNN••NHa• •K•e••••.•••••aox ••••••••••••••••••••••••• . - .. • • T.OTALS,Oi•LOTS`s' L'OTSMEc1ING; 13ASICREOUIREMENTr - - - --'° -- .. S LOTS = LO - IgEE1ING SOLAR UUILDiNO UNE's- 17----' ==if. _ . nummummammion. . . . . 7 %SOLAR :LO1S - - t ' , EL. �BiiSING:28%,EXEMPT ! o _ ! 01 S EXEMP I EO FO t CAUSE NOTES: . .�aa - •W� • .. . .... . •AWWNNrMw••i•K • •MRl '".tuttiioation atitt d tor aHlou.k except those- ®xenptod •M•NNN•NNS NN •N••Ma•bN••iM•wN•N.wt.W••.•••M M.•M•N•N•N!w••tl•MNN Evert hts- artilsit e m ezetttptt;d : must': tnaat_ setbae3I- rttquiratnertl is t2D -v a a► mondari W •M••..•YM. NN w•N•••N•.•• N.N.M .K M•.•M_N" it tiler woule shade a. tot: which Is: flat exemitted •44-1.8e. U) V GWATN Aye' ONESON County of weshington city 0i4 Tigard r� ,dA . .a,, ' being first duly awarn/afi* on "d!ae and say g (Please print) That I am a )1. ' Or The City of Tigard, Oregon. VThat 2 served NOTICE OF PUNLXC HEARING L OR: That X carved NOWICE OP DECISION FOR: r Ity of Tigard Planning .rector \ligard Planning Commiaeai ©n Tls' rd Hearings officer T Bard City Council Ii Copy (15it1Lo Hearing Notice /Notice of Exhibit ni att, hed list marked iex ilAt each named t i a said notice NOTICE OF DE1:2 SIGN as hop o bulletin board on the day of NfT in the United Staten Hail on the postage tage prey aid oath Decision) of ijhich i$ attach (Narked Sera ne at the addrea�1 abor>n m ,,the .o.E� day o$ wee... _ aiw.r. 19221=, attached, WaSPoStad on an appr o►priate and titer 'Ltd day of �.. tr:ite Prepared Notice day of 11 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT » MEETING ON MONDAIC, jilly_11992, AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD cal= CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: SUB 92-0007 FILE TITLE: Wardin/McMonagle NPO NO: 6 APPLICANT: Ford Wardin OWNER: Same PO Box 310 Newberg, OR 97132 AGENT: Harris-McMonagle AssOc., Incq Bill McMonagle 12555 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: SUBDIVIS/ON SUB 90007 WARDIN/NCMONAGLE A request Tor Subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide an approximataly 7.75 acre, three parcel site into 23 lots ranging between 10,057 and 16,876 square feet. The subdivision is proposed to bill Aeveloped in two phases of thirteen and ten lots. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Cormunity Development Code ChapteM 18448, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18.144, 18.150, 1..160, 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1g 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 6.1.3; Comprehendive Plan Transportation Plan Map. LOCATION: 15060 SW 100th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 11CB, tax lots 1400, 1500, and 1501) ZONE R-3.5 (Reaiden.qali 3.5 units/acre) The R-3.5 sbning allows Single family residential units, pqblic support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufaoturerli homes, family day care, home occUpations, and accessory structures amonl Aher Uses., THE PUBLIC HE ART ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OP CHAPTER 15 AL OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES or PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE MOM) CITY COUNCIL AND AVAtLABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHIOTEit 18.30. ANYONE WISHING '1'0 PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON TilIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO so IN WRITING PRTOR TO OR AT THE PUPLIO HEARING 4 ORAL TESTIMONY NY BE PRI=NTED AT THE poaLto MARINO. Al THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECIEVE A STAFF gEtIontr PRESENTATION VROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN T. PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE HOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFidER CONTINUE tgE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL XgrogmAtioNp tP svaSE TEE Ismitid HEARING AND TAKE TION ON THE APPLICATION. Tr A PERSON SUDMITS EVIDENCE IN f5OPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER Jungggi, 1992 ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NJi CONTINUANCE 4RANTED At THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN TEE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE gtd011b REMAIN OPEN FOR At LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE I3 A LIST OF ? PPI,OVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM, THE TIGARD COMHUNITV: DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIC ARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Al PROVAI DISA1 ►P OVAL OF THE REQUEST EY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON TIOSE CRI'T'ERIA MID THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE NEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT CO M 2NTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE A.PPL ICABLE CRITERIA LISTED 0 ! RAISE AN ISSUE IN P OR PROVIDE $UF�'INT PRIOR 'kO THE CL 3SE OF TIM TO RAI PERSON OR BY LETTER AT :�,�0)"� POINT 7 TO FAX ..� _. �� CI:ENT SP { '�'1t� I�EAitIt�O ON THE REQUEST FAILURE '.�°� k iZOVIi�E SPECIFICITY T..+, AFKIRD THE )EC.TSION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY , x) RESPOND TO Ti's ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPTJAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BAEIE1 ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS Ma) APPLICABLE CRIPL1C'•.IA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AV3:IL BLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PEA PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION TY PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER Jerry ��,�££err;, . AT 639-4171, T'3GARD CITY HALL, HALL BLVD, a Olt CONTACT YOUR NEIVHBOIA -HOOD CHAIRPERSON' ' 6 P �l� ION �r0 � PHONE NUMBER: � 639- 8507',.�,�,;,�„ INEZ .: C; P MIANOO1S • MAR LYtN c DA ►AFL t 11A6 .4.,04.,.."‘ 00, , ►au:v.arr.rv" 04 TIGARD QR 97224 2s111C11 00200 troowo "ioiVo soar* ols•' 'O •' { t HART, THOMAS. J AND =DNA `s1� '14915 "SW 1031W AVENUE TIGARD OR 972,'G4 k 2Sli ="40900 • o w b a o e o 0 0• o a1. o o 04s.46., iTHOMAS, DOI W BONNIE L • 14940 SW 103RD Avg I TIGARD OR 97 224 i 281110E -01100 • ••• •0eerar••awq.wsos•• I , DENNIS AHD JUDY A 14975 SW 1031D►. AVE ITIGA10 DR 97223 2silicx..0.H 12.104 ;r a o•ewhi••wo'w is, o•••o•c• DERXDDER, JM $ 10365 SW DE MONTE DRIVE ' I MMRD 014: 97223 25111 1°'!1306 0k000•000000000.00000 DISRME, 1 1.R LIRMISARA A 104720 SW DEL W,RIt MOM TIED .0 f1722Ji 'Nw ... -11 . ■��Iy-.. /'�1,,u %��j..,r..,,r 2S 11,0 01308 • o• oomeoe owe oe• e404404 !'1'IIyUS; DAVID anakI(' W 14905 SW 104T ,ray' D OR 977223 2S111CB=A01601 444404,444.14M444444444 S W:LIGHTER, JOHN DEATRIC 15025 SO 104TH . x 1E TIGARD OR 97223 251110E -- 02700 iieeoseesseoke•seai•••o•ai THOMAS, DONAW W Daerviaz 14940 SW 103RD TIGARD OR 97224 GIESRRig', R it A, 14 D 1.u'. 1.0235 aW HOODVX +1 DR tIGAgb 0R 91223 -0q e� o • a+ s • • • e 251.11CR 01 / ®6 oso•o•�omo••s dI C TSISI y LAWRE)te; L RIME? T A►, A L 10305 SW HOODVIEW DR .9 • 11 LAIJ._ J, I •, rsul ♦ r1., ',TIMARD OR 2231 2S11a.C8.408041 ••"ibOwww.wo•yf 1.'9•* CROSS• MOTE G AND Dowriot 1t ;i.,4900 SW 103RD TIGARD OR 97224 2S11s4100O wb•eewowow•`owe••www • r i SQSRtDce, Damn J & JOZSA, 11ARGARET ANN 14980 Sti 10311 TIGARD OOE 17224 2S111CD01200 w•beww$ww•••H eevoclo y♦ IALLEN, LINDA L 10330 SW DELMONN .5=1/13 TIGARD OR 97224 I251.110E -0A305 .•000.0.0000.000000.0. SWAM. SHARON iWA ( �. , (FORMERLY JO1WS) i 10370 SW DELMONTE DR r,. EORTD OR 97223 q 25111• 1 01301 iitiq.,�eww•oe•4eo•oot)eooii. fOHLL, RONALD �,Y I t ' ALEPVHDPA M , i 10450 SW DELMONTE DRIVE °I TIGARD 011 97224 .xr �25111.Co- 015040 weoslba6 •01000o46444o44 EVEL N %.10PILI$ , eP�I.;,�STI�IrJkIQ '' 1 71.. 15025 SW 100 TIGARD OR v 97224 Ij„� q /� 2S1.11C8. 02601 4404et40•40•0•001.0•■00 tai%, RONALD A BETH R 14925 SW 100TH TIGRIS) OR 91223 71! 11 010.02 •e,� 444i4444.4b4w•mboo4 ULME ItXNG, JOHN Y KA EN 15165 SW 100TH TIGARD Olt 97223 2S11108-01705 sbeir6i4osoelnemeiii►bbbwo GIL,uIHAW, TH '24. ANDMAN' It /1.0275 p .SW pB0O. 'CDR 2S111419 —91707 r w eti T.ASZt LLR, A5l7RI • a w • a 0 0 ;1' 1.1.' 0 • .O • • • A' • ' 28111ICB- 01 108 eoy • O a » w Q'. RNER, RICHARD 's BARBARA N 10260 SW BOODVIEW, DR TIGARD OR 97223 • 444 • • b•• e 2S111C -01712 •bb•s +b4o•• CARVER, WILLIAM A SUB H 10155 SW ?30ODVIEW DRI' FE Ticaitit OR 97223 25111'01714 •w ••••b4mbea s•a4 • MARTZN, JUDITH & HUNT, TROX % DAB. U, JAY 'E 15215 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 2311108 - 01736 bb 4444.•••••••• PATTON, BARPLD L CARD !� i 10340 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97224 2S3y .3.103..031.738 rao•4o••s•••••o••w••• SCHWIDT, BLDOf P AND MARTBA L ' 10400 SW 800DVIk~ TIGARD OR 97223 2812,.108.-,0174® •O •OO �' m FIELD; DAVID L 10450 SW BOOMS. Erd TIGARD OR 97224 2511108 -01742 4,•0••0'4'4. 4.3• BUTAW LAVRENLIE i70Yc1 10425 SW H00DVI' DR TIGAR OR 91223 2S11JC3-01744 .............4...4466 3IPPIN GORDON & DONNA 10365 SW BOODVIEW TIGARD OA '91221 2S1 11Cn ..®1.7w t 4 4• NM w O O • O • bR ! O O 0 ! • O 4 MtNEL13 0 8DW it0 d & VOW :10335 SW ItOODVIEW DR icd 0R 97/24 13 ' �1 9 s O• o r 4 • O e•• 4 s 23I118D 8!.]:51 `,. • . •, 24GYS, DONALD L IDA e7 5060 SW . 100TH TIGARD OR 97223 1 2S111C -01709 •b• - 4•••e�•'4 OORTRIGHT, ROBERT i . RATHERII A 10200 SW ROODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 2511100- 01713 ••4•• 4 ••o Mr4• b FAST, JEFF .A AND KA`x`FEX I3 ;10185 SW''800DVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97224 281110 01735 d4.4.4. • •.444••4•. 1 ANDERSON, JOHN EVEItt 10330 SW NOODVISH OR i �• T: G RD OR 97223 281110- 41137 ..4b•ois06+om4w4. •00000 1 HENDRICKSON, ROBERT N X110370 SW zooDersztt DR - ' r TIGARD OR 97224` ' •,. q �y 2811101.01739 44•44•4444•44•4444•44 LACY, JOHN R AND /KATHLEEN A 10430 ROODVIEW DR t. TIGARD Ca 97224 281.1108• -01741 4,, 4•d••O•40440444•44•4 CERNDLEE GENE 1M AkItIN ANNE 10455 SW BOODVIEW DR T',G ARD OR. 97223 281110 .'01743 t,b,sbii.ae PETERSON, R0F3IN I AND GENSLER, OB STONIER L 10395 SW I100DVI DR TIGARD OR 97223 444 O 4400 2S11103 01,7 r �� •eoseo••s•w••" 4so•r, 45 •• STEwART, daat 0 & LOI."s D ADDRESS aNzatotti 2S1IIUDm01504 4 4 4 b d. O41444 4. 4 4444444 BERN, PEA 99'75 BW BATOR ST TIGARD `ft 97224 2S1118D- 01511 •ale ,a.∎ •• •1ldboai4mbdOa, Datr N Al* ISO 1,5040 sw 100th TtG ' 97214 • • • I. • agivog ! $S Qt90I 0 UNiW W`' MO 0O79O PVQ 1tS Z FZZL6 40 p][ ; gB 5 0 WG' MS QZ9OT 001PM44".000MO9"4' 0099Q°- 0TVB; Ftt# OILIO 4 MS O0BE SIXdVg !:Xaa 00t907aCOTT1n E M5 l0 STM01 *Itch OPSO'1 NOtIV 'uses 00fJ90vW OttSg IZZL0 MO (IMMIX 0 attlowlaa iii SSSO X HUM' 'HEROES Y Y P O • . O Y . !� . Y O O O •� d. 0ooso= 0t 6Az ; 'I 1, I! ioa.a►wri.�.a o• SZLtE XoS Oa 1 t mama 'OO W M an , 14 ciuox 'bioSMi Orr •••••°•• .00SL0- Mttttf. MO oativu MOOT zm OTZSt flatMlillie l QS o , GIN vim omit:Via ationvwx 4 a .. • • • 00 ... • • • Qi•• o0EL 1 /Y.14Pt ICSE ' 1 1. '�►ZZLfi SEZL6 110 GHVOIX eYS MB 0066 ME0US VID °xuasoxad o° o • O . 0 °• • *. • e'f 0 "113 . Y . 00800- mr -itsZ a. t`IwL6 q�+ MS yry I& rava®s mar sita Caa a dasu s % u ¢ o u ... a •'• m • .) a .. o . . 000 0-001 4tSZ EZZL(. MO °WOII Hai LLIVS X18 BS66 I gamma MV lir RCM �@i a 't OS'' t+I a"---00.00.00."0 0. !ATP -0EMTTSZ 1O aguetz ca S LOj ' SO Mr OE9Ot i YIXTOUTA/! NIAgISW ‘113111TH ..,.....,.......-0.-- C' Q0 °Q OttSZ. m o O C! l O O EezL6 10 aaVoIx QW tog OLSOI 0 MU-Marian MU—Marian 8i4 SOS .0..00.0' JOS90° OttSZ £ZZL6 ao a AIL 3i0 =ON 7210 MS OSSOt VIIRHS 0 AHR79 aOHIOUVX °"'00° 0 "0' O0E90 OV0ttBZ vZZL6 810 Oa ioaac uo g&T mil 1g0 HS StSOt '°'°3000 00090- OUOttBZ EZZL6 110 cnr oix MOOT MS 09ZSt A violin A flB o o o o o O ... 009upromItTsz gib HMOOT MS 0tZ9'C u7is. e 'i MIAva '/�BOBdS ' q + EZZL O U0 GWISTM MS UFZIMV9 MS 0966 'MOS sus Or 'mown ""w 00ELO-votTrszi r.ana.saro.o..o.o k • . _ dLLS AL1118IS31 , TOOT MS ®ZOST .. .. a .... .. .. 00tt0 -0STI SZ PZZL6 MO aKvOis, gM! 19ZOOT MS Otbit ****°°"*"..... 6TSt0 1 tttBt ezzL a i0 Oa DLL' 0t M2 0S6►t AINI a T'I7I1 '" MVMUSAIM tTSTO-OSTXTSE aa7xxis KS SS86 2S110AD °06900 •rio••i /'r�r�it PLYWOOD IMPORTERS LTD 1211 SW 5 +.i POMPANO OR 97e2O IIIRI'C".ad ALBERT N ■ IfKRIAretig 16200 3W 109Th TIGARD OR 97223 2SI .ODA OO500 « ERICS ON, ALBERT /3 VANE 1 5200 SW 2.00 TH A. TIC OR 97224 41441 1 1- 10236 SW .000041.SW OA TIGARD - OR 97223 2&111ct3•-o1706 i�a•owlagier•�wr•e`o'i CIR'� N LAWECE L AND LAS L 10305 SW 1100DArtEW »R TIGARD OR 97224 2S111C -01112 44...e`epogsooalsoora►woa' triltina"'7 WILLS a $U RN , 10155 sw iVI R DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 2S111CB •0170 7 ;ae'� oe ieeIr •oaeb•i a TAEINBLER, maim D JoLsli' 10290 , SW EOODVXEW DRIVE ?'r G1 RD OR 97223 r w $1±3i1B"01713 .......... o a • to w w a ,0 o o= • LAST, J ! T Pa AM NATalt D .1..10165 SW tIOODV "P''' , MITE TIGARD OR 97224. it 20 .10tD .. 06I00 a.w ei3O rOgM:beii.rN QOO'Rr WIZEN SILVIS DirVIRGISIA R 10630 $W reathowen RD ► TIM OR 97223 23110AD -05710 ooardow1rrt'000e ooeaaa !imam, vxi ohnitaxwzr. R 10630 S DEAN RD TIGARD OR 9722B 2S111BD- 04300 & 04400 SQL & vICTORIA GoTTER III 9855 ski . PEPMR E TIGARD OR 97224 BARRitS-MCMOIrtAGLE ASSOC. BILL MiM 'NAGLE 12555 Ski HAtr ELF TIGARD OR 97223 10620 W 'DLLklON E 1)R IGARD OR 97223 2811b�. g � p M1 0670 0400000.004.0.00. ? ry �i. T s MXLtER, .I IN D /VIRGI +l .66 1.0630. Sw DELMOI17 RD tIGARO, OA 97223 2i9110AD°068 O0 V +p 0000 SAXE, ox 1064 DL 'NON P ti .01•••q•-•4,0 • •oa0r 4Q4T0 1. tTTi 1�.1 S0 aagipx,x iQ MNIlia00 3 MB r44QT 2Y N w` 0H 401y''Y"R I XO • • • /� • •, r O 0 4 • • O •. • �. P ° O SO0 TQasCW. 1. & ? ou••Mad+}M•• £ZZL6 21Q aUlipx& sJ,00T Ng B9TST w HHH7HI R110-0 sONX7161MqO • • ZOLTO °£I 'CTTS Z Z;I ■L 6 1g;) OZT4YOY1 210QTM0 SZVT .e�o•�••�s TOSZO -SOTT OZ fiKZLE Io UU t L OOT MS SZOST I2a x.aO'z HX, iaAa '$•O MS i' IVI e ° o •`• • e o {� • • • • e 0 • 009TO HOTT6SFi: t EZLS HO auvoi L anxua m stlaa ms Os of H VYGNVXI'TV QOVNO4 'HV�i o • • o "- 1.00 }�O�'BN 4TTSU SZEL6 5110 CINV7IHOd ua EXHOHIHO MO OLEOT (gmuor x'Yu o z ) a 2011 1100 s St E/S • S?£T0-60ITTsz '6ZZL6 UO auv074,1 r a ss,NCo1gSa As OECOT 7 vam /7 �/'�(� ►y • .°•• •••O•• O• P O•••• e•• OOZ1��®'°±.`TTgZ O • • • ,• • Y ZZL6 8O auvV.0 x Q2Y£OT Ms OB6VT HMV slillIEVOUNFR syszor e £ r2axm a 'Ina/gams y••••••C•G•O•• OOOtO-BOTTTSC PZZL6. 110 Ol OX& d1EO t MS OO6tT WWI A1110u0 L £ZZL6 HO aOL. OUQH MS OSTOT I A 4 maXA00,ON MO gOEOT' 'I VN.4.7 aNliU1 OONa ' IXSI UX0 e••P•!••°r•••••o•••p S OLTQ°°NDT{•{•s4 cZZ46 40 iUMPII is MaI4(IOOB MS SEZOT aNKV0a 21 a E 4 e4Nor uggaX o !!0000,!,0,0.! v • cOLTO -aPT 4TSZr 1O G NOXW ageoT MN Ot'6tT Nl$No E a!WNOO ' SVNOXS • • • OO4ZO °80TTTSZ, tiZZL6 EZZL6 1O auirDII SOOT MS SZOST OTaiX' 'HRH V NHOI' '11 H /HPt1V'IS o••••�•e••cP90••••'O�� O9To goTiTsz E Z Z L 6 110 ativoiar, Tq p� Haitst Laynpq/SyO6T7t xY x/r O.iA a SFi4�b l��i "i • a • • 3 p • ° • • • • • • • • • • • 9OST°- HOTTISe EZZL6 HO OUVOII 44I)1G &NOW 'IHO MS OTt'OT 11 i g /°Z IHHHOH 'ansia e o • • • • R'• • • • C • e • 4' • • • ° 9OG: b B s 7Tsz • • • 0 0 1 0 • 0 EZZL6 $Q (lutist& �tt1i is uzNow 'IWI 40 $9£OT •00400 EZ; L6 110 alive= BAY t13£OT MS SL6VT v xanc' aulf STl Ns '73111111H 'ZZ1.6 'aC aavaII am" auEOT NQ 0,6,►T OINMOH M 1110a ' glqi�NoNx O •••° +••e•o•ee�•o� ►•s O6COw0O'4LTSZ, trZZL6 HO THVOIM HONHAV aucoT Mg ST6` T •••e ♦•a••g�•••♦e• ••° O0ZO0®SOTt B '64ZL6 lets �s a'nw MB 003VOT sortrur 1 . b �0l •r, ry 2S111C8- -01708 •..•o.iu.. .�i. KTABNER, RICHARD A BARBARA 10260 SW HOODVIEW TIGARD OR 97223 2S111CD °01712 .• ........ ....... CARVER, WILLIAM A SUSAN M 10155 ' SW HOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 28111CB- .01714 0444 •6.••.i• MARTIN, 17UD a vg & HUNT, TROY DALMAU, . AY E 15215 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 28111Q .y C8 ..0173E o4444444440• 44444444o PATTON, HAROLD L CAROL J 10340 SW 1SOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97224 2S .11CB"-01709 r • .. • . • • • ik TRIGHT, ROBERT 9 KATHERINE 10200 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE `X' ARD OR 97223 28132. q CB— 1 q. O••Or1 ,1+08 V.L7S2 e••'.se•.,Y•i /••o F`A8Tr, JEFF A AND KATHY D 10185 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97224 0 0 4 ....... 281110H- 01739 ..•• .v.• ANDERSON, JOHN DIRER 10310 SW HOODVItW DR TIGARD OR 97223 2.111013 °01735 .'••gi.•�•m.:e...i SCIDT, ELDON 1 AND MARTHA t 10400 SW HOODVIEW TIGARD OR 97223 2811108 -01740 e••....a..lio 444•ii1 FIELD, „DAVID L 10+60 SW HOODVIEW TIGARD OR 97224 �'"0�i. 2S111CB 1 �j 7°b2 4co4 .e4444.1 oa.imgs.. BUZAN, LAWRENCE JOYCE s 10426 GW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD OR 97223 28.a1CiB °01 144 ........ . e . • .... • .. GIFJ'IN, GORDON & DONNA 10365 SW HOODV/EW TIGARD OR 97223 2Si :11CB -01745 •s4e..oeii o.eaie -ii MOREL'S, EDWARD 3 & VON 2AE 10335 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD OR 97224 2S111ED- 01510 ................044.0 COMEGYS a DONALD L IDA J 15050 5W 100TR TIGARD on 91223 28111C8 -01737 0.4.44 e...• .0••4.04 HENDRICKSON, ROBERT W 10370 SW HOODVIEW DR TIOARD OR 97224 2$111CB °03.73 s. i o i•.• w. • LACY, JOHN R AND KATHLEEN A 10430 HOODVIEW DR TIGARD Ot'k 97224 2SS11Ct0174 .iiosore.,iii•s.i.ii.o. CHANDLEE, GENE $ MARILYN ` ANNE 10455 SW HOODVIE W DR TIGARD OR 97223 2671+G.:GisJ6a °V�. /4� 640444444444444 4,4,44 PHTERSON, ROBIN I AND GENSLER, CHRISTOPHER L 10395 3W HOOAVIE DIFt TIGARD Ott 97223 24111CB- 017455 44444444444444444 .. STEWART, JACK D & LOIS E ADDRESS 'UNKNOWN EYEEE, REX D 9975 SW SA' ER ST TIGARD OR 97.224 28113.81`- Cb151,1 biw0 a • e:. ®�:. twXsoN ST1PHE i 15040 SW IOOTH TIGARD d 9'214 4 • JANICE KAY 9885 8W BATTLER TIGARD OR 97224 2S111ED -01514 .i Y.a...r. ■•• :• e•e RIVERMA'N, 'WILLIAM N 7NA: 14950 SW 1100TH TIGARD OR SI223 28111ED.01519 a .. • • . a ... ... , ... . VOLE, JEROME 3 SHARON J 14910 $W 100TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 28111BDA04100 ra.s••a•s••.'aso.•s.o• LILE, KATHY S 15020 SW 100T31 TIGARD OR, 97224 2811,1CA -07200 • ..•o.a•.• eo BECK, JOHN C AND SHE;RIE GOTT 9960 SW BATTLER ST TIGARD OR 97223 14980 SW 100TH TIGARD OR 224 28111ED- 0E,511 .A .e•.•,e' .. NELSON, 8 ALAN JRR AND DEANNAR 9955 3W SATTLER TIGARD OR 97223 2S111811.-04000 r�•••.s# #nso e....6w FREDRICKS, MARY RJ/DARON, E.DM H t REED, DENNIS AND SUSAN 1,9020 SW 100T1 "CIGARD OR 97223 216111CA -00800 ao..•.aa..a.a +.h•,•.s V'EXB; KERT, ANNA HERSiCHDERGER 9900 SW SATTLER TYGABD OR 97223 • 6 . e e . 283 11OA "07300 04•604•00..,,,,,,,.... MC`3AUGH o PADRAIC DANA ARO J 8NUAM, SUSAN JEANETTE 15210 SW 100TH TIGARD OR 2S111CAr07400 .......0.0*. ..e• o •. ANDERSON, DAVID L & JILL 8 15240 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 2S111CA- 07600 sw.n.4.•a#e;.6••r GUEVARA, VICTORIA V & RAMON V GUEVARA, LUCIA ` 15260 SW ? 60Tg AVE TIGARD OR 97223 97224 0 • 28111CA -07500 0.000x.0. o.•.••...0. JOHNSON, TODD W AOD WEATHERVORD, DEECRAH J PO BOX 31726 CHARLO°ICTE NC 28231 •e••s 2S110AD 05900 .e .000,4060.000410.0 BECK.ER, JOAN M 10555 SW DELKIMTE DR y .g, tom. 2S1IOAD -06000 40406.- .0046e.e..060e0 HARVEY, PAULINE M 10545 Jig DEL MONTE DR TIGARD OR 97224 2S110AD- 06300 o. •a. ••ss a e.eeo i ARDING, GLENN O SHtILA 10550 SW DEL MONTE DR TIGARD OR 97223 2S1IOAD -06500 e.IC0 .6O 07"4"6e6• d 6 RUSTRUM; HERBERT D 10510 SW DES; MONTE O`1' TIGARD OR 9723 2S1iQ 0670o • e• 6 s 6. s o s 6 W e e t. 6 e s o 6 MILLER, MELVIN D /VXRGINIR R 1080 SW DELM0NTE RD' TIGARD OR 91224.. 281IOAD -06200 0060410400 1010400646 RI& ER, ALICE 0 10540 DEL MONIt DR STrF TIGARD OR 97224 2S110AD ,,06400 em••J, .oes••40.i6i4os HAIGHT, ROGER OAR1C, MARY E 13500 5W PAOIFIO'13 TICARD 97223 2S?,.i,u "AD -06600 oo.reoui GmYroacaaaaroo LARSON, •VIROIL M O$t *E • 10620 Sl1 D tkOktT°F O • 'Z�IGARD!R 97223 2S110AD- 06800 60• .'ii . .s bo <yea a•ss SAXE s CAFiOLYI+N a7 10640 SW DIAL 4ONTE 2511040 06900*, ••'•9a•••a••••••.,: 2S11ciDA -00100 .•..' PLYWOOD I ".:RTRRS ZTD tRickSON $LJ3ERT' 'R &c 12'11, PTO 5x1 VRR&ENk F '' PORTaa ND 'Ott 97204 15200 S W 109TH A V � T!G'D QR 97223 2S110DA-- 00500 4444••••e•• ••gt•e•o RRICK ) r c `Xtt ,RRT R & 'ERNE F 15200 SW 109TH, AV'R., !G ';DR 97224 Hi DEAN 10235 SW FM h eVlihW DR TIGARD Oil 91223. 23111015-01706 ••• •d• • • «• • • CI ROT SXI • LAWR CE L AND LAURA L 10305 SW aOODVIEW DR TIGARD OR 97224 28112,08- 1'91712 bdo ••e•••0,oeem •• • CARVER, WILLIAM A °SUSAN M , 10155 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 10271) 6W 150ODV' TIGARD QA. 7224 201 10E- 41CO7 •d,nd6• • GtY.• - • •.M0 00•.44 TOM , AtFRRO deItY 10290 3W 1100DVI8W DRIVE TIGARD (' 97223 25111.08- 191713 .6".0000 4600001•000 PAST JEFF A AND `KiTWI 10185 BW HOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97224 2SS110AD- -06700 inr MILLER g MEL IN, D /VI FIG/ NIA R 10630 SW DFL! NTE RD TIGARD OR 97223 2 L1OADwt1671O • a•••••• s•• •••do• MILLER, HELVXN D /VXRG.NI14, R 10630 8r DE J'iONTE RD ICARD OR . 97223 2S OD -06700 mtl. MILLER p NELVIN . 1D/ RGXNTA I 10 630 SW DELHONTE RD TIGARD OR 97223 is 4 10520 SW DR TIGARD Ott 97223 2aile J , 06800 salmi CAROLYN J $0640 SW DEL MONTE "CXGARD OR 97223 •.c [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] CR. NO. 119 r.vTx. 1° 926 ioo.61 9100 92 = #n.:it LOOt, 4-1._ 1000 9600 9500 ! 9400 3 2 42.12 65 a; 5 751 Eoo'. 2 ASK1.NGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE: in 100 SEE MAC' 2S 1 _ IOAA, AC 1....-_% , (.5.....22,, ..._____,_____,.. ________. CE32t Aft13_ ; MID ®55,/'744 STREET. t 110 02 ca AU= s ins; CAECELLED TAX LOT, 4210,4Z00,4140,4400, 4410, 4500, 4510, 3c3OTL' ' tg907104 aooTR.'t�,'; 3600T1l."D; 1400Tit.''t, 60110TF20 6130TYe.' , 42093NEW COM.+Pf0PERTr 56.E tD PE as LANG: HILL _ OEM 835/540 33J3n 32. 1600. 1500 ' 13 g 34 $_ VI ,[e ; -24 3 3 4 1 18-G tp 36 00 Ef . 31. 09:x, E! s inerl [C.S: No. t2,? 3 TRWS,W, MURDOCK -�t 3500 =? 77 8400 a TRIG' 4600 WAGON; SKEIN . CCR; S0LOKIN R tCWARDSON 0.1v C 44 r,r 1� CORNER 2 ATO 69 63 tlx FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE 5700 It 33.15 5900 32 A43aaSt a E EL ONTE • .:...,:� 1,4 it@Vae let' w 24 14. . •94, 24 ef%!f!f}1 /!VIOWtA 30 30 70 6V , MOO era 081 w ffirhfilhtle4�h '/!.i/i7AVI/J3!//a"If /DJfi E tie se -' la "E ` O cOPRIT ORE ON Mita av NOR 3 308 - NTgRY let. 7.00Ac. es- 237.32 arOb- SOO 3E5 5 ..f. I3sHS.. FOR ASSMENT PURPOSES ONLY DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTTER USE= su $. i.9? PROW: Tigard Planning Department RR: SURI_A AON SUB 92 -0007 A R� s04 .w3 d an approximately request for." Stmbdii,fmion preliminary plat approval to d 7. ' ne a feet. parcel aubdiviaiOn Le ',proposed to nbe del eo 10,057 n two and Les of acres three arcel site into 23. lots ranging ` ' ` c ni�cy Development thiee�� t,enr:� -. ten lots. �1PI1I�9Ir�,� CRITERIA: I' REVIEW Ca81T8'RT Code Chapters 18.48, 18.88, 1842, 18.102, 13.144, 18.150, 18.160, 18.1641 Comprehensive Plan Policioe 2.1., 4.3.1, 7.1.2, X7.3..1, 2.4.4, 7.6.1, 8 4.1, and 8.1.3. . LOMTIO : 15060 SW 100th Avenue (MIN 281 11CU, tax 10i 1400, 1500, and 1505) ZO : R-3.•5 (Residential, 3.S unite/acre) The a -53.5 sen .ny allows single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment hoes, farming, manufa Lured hordes, family day etre, hobo occuppationst, temporary uaale,, resider. t l 'luta tanmke, and accessory etm puree among ether' uses. Attached is the Site Plan and appl+,eant' e titatement for your review. 1.iirtin irr min available to by to , a report and agencies n and ll from pared, information grepam�ed, and a decaaian will be rendered On the proposal in the near future. of you wish to comment on this application, wo P L, y ...._ Yeti may need your cnt,e ' �'une. 18 1992.E Use the ep ito0 p or attach a se arate Etter to retiree our c . mmenta` . ! z �.�.� ro�r��es� below f yon .arcs un�r��.a to n'e�ctacan►d .�y tie ®. t4ate. please lah�xme the � your _ y � �.,ontaa . ,. itin ash soon a he of a eeiblo. s matter, Contact the notes3 1�1a �$f��tt have �aw�eoae�eet3.onaornf i� �u� comments in Writing �i .. aid } g �g • ?9 p y / 131255 SW ,Hall 8.l�vd., Tigard, OR 97223. PRO,Bs Planning �A►i a�tamea�t PO �'n�; 2339? o 639-- 4171. STAVE' CONTACT: err 's s errsrrur .. P]f SE CHECK Tim FOLTARING APPLY: 1•rxe.l.IrNIOORM We have re. ierwed the proposal and "mire no ob jekrti As to it. l ase contact of our office. Plea:3 s refs to the enclosed letter. Written Conte nvAsAmemsvoli tlin: � ... s�r.•V l�Ili,x:r711r'.N•1 }��1..' 9kNll.,:h ,:..., . .; .. ,... 'F. .. .. ' ....... bPtl11111MiI. -- .maiu:ie�siaYxrw. Frlwwl 10N.- M'CiIS.'ry4rt' W11.• ■OMMIliNIMPAMMINI.1110MIMOWMP �..rrNf...ir. .�r�..n.�rer .. ..•:....... :iiaw^��Inrerrw °'+moni.one°.ii" qM., w4i+ w:: o.r r�. 4.:. iM�rm .riiiiiiuesis.:�wiiib.w�W..a. Nate of PEtreon Co n mentLng: Pbohe lsttl olherr km/Stw9a -07 a BKt4 • Jt. eP • ICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICA2rIONS CITY DEPA4 Building og%in ail /Brad R. A I ( Recorder, eating/Chris . ts Cordinaor° a no la a. SPECIAL DI CPR Fire District (Pic up box) V s_r 9Titggs rdrew O R att Disitr ct 0I18 a !17223 Tti ftlatin Valley Water District 65ot Sw Taylors Ferry Rd. Tiqard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED JUUX8DIC X0 f8 Wash, Co. Laud Use 4 Tramp. 150 14r, First Ave. N1i11sfiisr6,'' OR 911124 ,0rent Cr rtia Serail Joact nice - Scott Ming 3'rt9 Eberle Mike BorRma!ot& C Lt7, Of 8tiat7ertton - a39su Rpndr rX PO Sort 4755 , 2eaverten, 0 t 97076 City of King City - city Eaua9Ar, 15300 DO 115th Ei g tvitl► OR' 9'x224 Ci t) of L, JtO OaWego - City Manage± 390 SO A Lake 0n►ego, OR 97034 State Righ`w`ay Divasion - Bob Doran Po Dk x 25412 Pc,rtlunrd, OR 97225r44.2 is SPEC TA AGENCIES ✓deberal Telephone Rush Wells 10 8W Main St. Tigard, OR 97323 kW Natural Gee Scott Palmer_ S' 220 NW mooed gave.. .. . ortlant!, OR 97209 TCX Cablitviaioik of Oregon - Kite 8a11ock 3500 SW ,Bond at. Portland; OR 01201 Columbia Cable _(ioaank Stoner - 14200 SW Fla: igado fl ct . BeavCrton; OR' 97005 6. S -- •� AFBr` u� i" ` ° iv . (0 T 0T) - Parks 6 SaibdiViain errgy eoh oil aG gWREdrDt e ion Divp e XV i ar Dept: Environ. QuEng7Aer ia l ity Dept. o€ V. FEDERAL AGENCIES Cbrpn. ow E igineet9 Pont O'fice A c OTTER $Utathern pacific Tralaarportatiah Company Duane k Forney, PLS - Prof,p t Rngitteer 800 Ni,1 6th Avoodo, „R. 324, Union Station bortlnnd, 00 97208 P i0 Recreation Board • O5 ereatioV !drool D/lnt No. 48 -ar - -. (Bea orrob) PO 200 n, OR 97075 School Dist. 233 ...,.... (Tigaird) 13137 SW pacific Hwy.' Tigard, Oh 97223 Body Commission 320 SW Stark Roma 530 Portland, OR 97204 MSTM 2 2000 SW lst aVC. Portland,. OR 97201 -5398 DLOD (CPilos only) 1175' eenzt at. NE Salem, OS ' 97310 -05VO Other„,,,.' City of Durham ""-"' ditty Manager 17160 SW Upper .Seabee Perry Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland - Planting niraetO2 1120 SW 5th Portland, OR 97204 ODDT • Lidwic0 Alva . 9002 eS Nc3 oughlian diivd,. Milwaukie, OR 97222 C/ Portland General Elea:. Brian Moore .14655 SW Old 8cho1i0 Fry. verten, OR 97007 . tro Area COtednidatiOns Jason Rewitt T 6tH Oaks. Tochrlology Cent 1 15 NW 169th Place 84i6020 S6avarton, ON 570065.4066 US West - Pete Ne]can 421 SW Oak Stu Portland, 0R 97204 D0GA1'1i - Division of State landas Cojmotee Dent. •r k‘s, Park tODO PtJC _._.' Fire �lareb.�*1.41 - Ot1ier - other_, -: e, CITY OF TIGARD PRE -APPLI1hTION CONFE7t2NCE NOTES DATE: E APPLICANT: AGENT: C /46.,M6t6 Phone: Phone: ---geriP.2 ADDRESS: ..k.1).5M...-P.5 5Lk) (O14 5041:2,..sf SAkithn'54)11., PROPERTY LOCATION TAX MAP & TAX LOT: intS 15100 15-01 NECESSARY APPL/C4TION(Z)PlAtapl,\ II /Aldia/11,644., PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION,: .1.,......wworamewemsroso 0116,1■10000MIMOOIMINPOP•01111.041M..,1.16,11■WW,M11.0■000.00“*...........,10MNOMMOMMIIIIMIMIMMI,..G■Mag.0.1■04•■•■ `immitiorrmoonleisemorme• xmommiirszvemarimMolsommed, lowiamin6emoWiiiarow, CO)rPREELENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Lt E I DEA )17 ZONING DESIGNATION: NEIGREOREOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #J414. 'CSAIAPERSON: 6167.' PIONEs ZONING DISTAXpt DIMENSIONAL 1E9UIREMENTS Minimum lot size: 1011(1)0q. ft. Mininvim lot width: -.421-ft. Setbacks: front- .,2a, ft. bide- 57, ft., reat-j ft. garago-h-212 fta ot,torriera„C) 'ft0 from both atrnetn4 Maximum site dOverage: , minimum landecOped Or natural getation area: Valet Maximilm building height: ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MiniMuM idt frontage: 25 fec unless lot Lb ...... d though the minor lbnd partition prodes6. tOte CtOkted avarrert o a Partition mnet halter a . MiniMUm of 15 feet of .7.tontage or have tiniinlimmi 15 foot Wide Oddest: easetent. MaxiMUM lot depth to width tatic of 1.5 to 1. sittlAt. SETBACKS ft. ftom centerline of vornorompownram. gtt'abliStieltldtltare ft. itt,n tetwidet-inkensity,-tiveneeta- ft.- along the elte s boUnda-tY .Plag lote 10 ft o Biee yatd eetbaejk Addebtiory attUdtdrebi up to 528 sq. tt. in dite,5 ft. teatoack from dide and teat lot liteb Accessory structures: up to 1606 wa. ft.; (whecla allowed) See , . applicable zoning diotrict eetbaCks _ . Zero lot line lots: minimurn 10 foot seParati'bn bt)tWeen buildinqd multi -fatillY reaidential building separation: see code Sectio4 18.030 Page p .4f1 ti • SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVlSIO2+. Flag Lots: Irlaxi.mum height of 1 -1/2 stories or 25 ft., whichever is less in most zones, 2-1/2 stories" or 35 ft. &fl R-70 w12, R.-25 or R-.40 zones if standards of Code Section 18.98.030(6) are met. Bus Lding Height Exceptions (code Section 16.08.020): Buildings s loa ed i. to a height of 75 feet Provided* m non-residential lone znayminin PA tbuilding floor area to rite area ratio) cf .1.5 to 1 will exist: 2. All actual building 'setbacks will be at least 1/2 the building's height; and 3. The structure will not abut a residential, zone district. RESIDENTIAL D74NSITY CALCULATION comaia.��i�, chapter ,. � Pe may Le calculated net e v ty Development Cede 'l8 92 s ci that residential units allowed on a particular site y dividing the net area of the developab4 by the miniraysm number of square feet required per dwelling unit ;g n the 'applicable zoning district. Net development area is caldulated b !► , subtracting the following land area(a) from the gross site area: 1. All sensitive lands ar;.ea® ,- land within the 100 year floodplain alopea exceeding 25% - drainagewaye 2. Land dedicate: for-` park purposes 3. Public right-of-way dedication 4. All land prwrided fOr private etreate (includes accessWaya though parking areao) The City of Tigard allows a residential density transfer of up to 26% of thea units that Could otherwlsn the developable dev�lo ,developed alal.e ��ort3.or� of site lands areas listed in (1) above to p pe in oroordance with Carte section 16.2.030. of the ap li ;ant for a e eid ntia1 development 1t~ is the rea�iana�ibil3.ty oL � pp application to provide a detailed c lculation for permitted reeidential . density and density txanafer. RESIDENTIAL nEVEtopmENT SOLAR ACCESS EQUt o aa. •ctitiona are �oub v ect to Effective May 1, 1;991. all auk�divfe fl � :. which a;cate that 30% of all lote deve. oped+ rn t solar access re gry.�t$nts � . sated lot are high►, be v e�lstaofoicient ±ime The sun striking the south wales and levels of �a *�,nt~�z�: xom:�a of the ha��e�e ._,gal® v g - south window area; and aouth�a�.l.oping roo f area. © l To achieve tII c one may utilize the following. b r 10 Basic requirement: Design a lot with at 1eaat 90 feet car nerth -etuth lot dimension and an Orientation within 30 degrees of s h, y P otectcd Solar Building Line: The eola,.4 building line met a) be ' G a oriented within 30 degrees cif eoutho b) have a r nimum of 70 feet between it and the middle Of e lot to the south, c) haVe a itea niktuai of 45 feet between it and the northern et buildable % bundary of the lot on Which the building line Le iocrAted a µ within ...: ...., , �. -._ �' � �. _ _ .�er�u3. ree �nd heave at i.�aet o ., with axle oriented �ce t 30 de reee� of an raa�.. t west. . ... ens The first o ti¢n the ouse to be 8o . of th' g`°'. r south w.11. protected from' shade* The seciond e ground floor .�W Page' • 4. 9 410 0 option requires at :least 32% of the .ass and shade. square feet of the roof area to, face south and be protected Total or partial exemption of a site from the ae1 ar access requirement can be tour the following reasons: East, wsst or north slopes steeper than 20 %. Goff -site shade sources (structures, vegetation, topography) Oni -sits= shade sources (vegetation) . Adjustments g reduction of the 80% sao.ax lot design requirent can be fothe follo following reasons: o Reduced density or an increased coat of at least five to: - east, went or north slope greater than 10%, - significant natural feature, • existing road or lotting pattern, - publir easement or right -of -way. Reducti A in important development amenities. pre-existing t bade (vegetation) . percent due Maps and te2a sufficient to show the developIn nt complies with the solar design standard, excett for lot , for which an exemption or adjustment is required, including all of the following 'Items: 1. The north -south let dimension and f orientation of each d cost lot. line a►ri.resnxt proposed lot. Protected a aar building lines and releva it restrictions, if applicable. .... 30 feet tall. ►end over F, a � map 3. For the purpose of identifying tr�esa e,.V,empt, from Section 6 inches showing existing gees at least diameter at a point 4 feet above grade,. includiing their height p that they are to be retained and are diameter and a e -:�,ea y and stating exempt. Copied of all pr5vate restrictions re3.at, yng to solar access. If an exemption or adjustment is requested, maps and text i to Show that given lots or arras in the d3velopAent comply 'with the t tiard s for such an e5 amp":ion or adjustment shall be ss bmitted,i REST ENTIA►t DENSITY TRANSITIOU eg allowed housing density in a zoning disat 1 `ict, any y �� 9 r Regardless ysw within the 100 feet of a designated established wed shall not be y n within l0 _ .. .: .. the maximum . � ... � greater than 1�5 percent parcel‘ . . developed at a density gran climprehensaive Plan designation (not zoning) of th j building site PAREZNG AND ACCESS Require3 atitomocile pat' I o x 'this . type pe of uw : 2 Sr; w _ ere . _ .hig t a.....,, ._....0..,....i ,::;■I 25% if tequired asa i aL� Qactm only space4e. stanyjrd ] arl � p ace dirensioia9 t X ft. compact parking pace dimenaione t 8.5 f t b X 15 ft. Er s.capp m requited auto. designated i ►'=' A l parking are P oviding in excess of fie bile patkirs<g spaces shall provide appres riet e) y iodated and w n uit I,, ter of handicapped di.cappFC� pa�kirag�, spa►c�4s:, Th+s�►i � `.; page 3 , • parking spaces to be provi and p Oregon' Revised Statutes (see hendot� symbol shall be painted1on the parking sign shall be provided. 131, cle 4 cy , ra�,ks are requa.red, for ci. commercial �,ses, and industrial .gees parking ' spaces. Bicycle parking mill bicycle racks space per 15 auto par located in areas protected from aut can provide apecifigati. s for app Al; , apace 'sire are :mandated by the ) . A handi : d parking space epace ace and an appropriate is uses, nor r+eaielent €al uses, providing 15 or more automobile t be provided at. a ratio of one g spaces Bicycle racks shall be b3,le traffic. The Planning Dive, ®ion ed bicycle rack types • All parking areas and driveways must - he pave,`. Drive -in use queuing areas:�,,; Minimum numbei c.f accesses: Minimum access width: imthn access width: pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outd t common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. For detailed information ' on deign requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Community Development Cede Chapter i! 18.106 and ;18.108. anuci,41........•. ..,.....:. �. .�s...m...ylu..oi.r..• -. ..u.rr� - ...ice: „..... _...__::.. a..,�:.. r:saa� `%=5.X1. AREA The City requires that clear vision be maintrAmeted between three and eight feet above grade aroad/driveway, ... p � road/railroad, and road/road oad intersections in specified clear v ion areas 9ihe size of the , required clear vision area depends Upon the abutting atrect e 9 functional classification, LANDSCAPING t ._ required aa',1 deveiopiflerita fronting . sin a publib or p ivatei Street or ft driveway Mora than ,00 feet in ngth. Stre et t `de3 m'oet be Placed Street rase are re t i p per t y within aixfd - of the gtt of :. aundary. �6*treet treesmuet have a mi airuaa caiipe of two ins he font feet above grade. Street,: treeie shotllld be Sce�° 20 th j p to 40 apart d0pend on m • ature x,ee Bite. may g afire t trees and i� li.et of 'Further inf ortrat ion c �n r ° 1 at ion affect . �� • �e . t y Planning Diviaion. recome�c�bnded Sire, t �r ,. ae mna be o: ba3.ne�i fgoa� the A minii,fiUm of one tree per eeVen around parrking areal it Order to ac.Yeening of raking areas from v ■rovided al,Itkinp Spaces must; be planted in aims, p oxide a canopy effect6 banddclped' ewiti froi rAablic rights-of� -way be Va J w •, In arder to increase privacy and. to reduce or colim visual impacts between een adjacent develepweutB, .es .and„ goes, the City requires landscaped ed buff peg /Asters. Rsquired width. $sfer are evergreen trees required in so Pea „read buf are eye mast be occa d' . mss. Sit cases, and, areas uti it:ie K a d sides en a only be e adverse noise 4)r ally bettae'een different areas alone certain site ibed by the C011e in terms of a misture of de0�t duoue and ring e''regn® o t ?enceea are also advisable even if not required. eupiOd b,p' v'egetatiofl, fences, Additional informatLon on requiirOd buff found 'in Coda Chapter 28.00 aaad th landscaping and buffering. Requirod buffer widths applicable to ft. al mg north boundary ,. ft. alonv south bound / SIGNS it area materials and sizes may be Plann. ng Di Vision bulletin on Ur proposal area ft. along east bmandary aedd Ltion eight obsacur3,s'g scr nixsg is require along Sign �er�,a�.t� � �� ,r gut is � a�rv�a�.xa1�1 �,�.�� Tigard. Peer mits rnuet be 'obtain€ 4 before erecting and{'' •sign in . ba A "Guidelines for S n a valion regnent. . Additional sign area or hOi gnat beyond 0$. ' le standards ndards y be perAtitt d if the sign pro .oaal is reviewed a °, part 0 a develoPmeat appli ation. ,.�._:.. PROCEDURE Adma.nthtrativ'e staff , review. .,�.. Public hearing before the land use he'ings officer. ._ Public hearing before the Planning. Cormiesis>n. public hearing before the Planing Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council Another public hearing in held by the City Councilor All applications Faust be accepted by a Planning ,DiVieion staff membv r at the Community Development Dep artmeet counter at City Hall. Applications submitted by ail or cropped off at. 'the counter without Planning ZINIFision acceptance may be ''returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following t eti ! a s applications f or. processing No a pp licatins will be accepted ,after 3.O( P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. Nape = ubmitted with an application shall be folded in advance vane to 8.5 by 11 inches. One C .5 inch by 13. inch :map of• a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff repot or administrative decision. The Planning Division and Engineering DivieioU will do a preliminaxy review of the application and win detea„1t n wheihar an application ie .complete days submittal. . notify applicant if additional information or opieeofthe submitted miorie� a are ne ded The administrative decision/ public • Jhearieig typically ,WU1 occur aPProximately 45 to 60 days after an ap plication n accepted as complete by the Plannin g Division. , li catlbns involving difficult issues or quiring review by other jt *risdictione may take additional time to re y g 10 r decisions ' are issued within' 10 days of the hearing. A tea appeal review. Written period �� l� ws :•��.1 decl.sfaris.. anal on this matter would y be heard by the i�. bagig flow diagram illustrating the review process La a vailable fro m the • Planning Divisions P a p applicant of the ._.rim Co unity The ra ap 1ioation conference and the notes of true confer& nce are intended �.t� inform the prospective a primary Development: Code requirements applicable , to development of a' particular site and to allow the staff and prospective , applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints , affecting .levelopeent of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code regdirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. failure of the, staff to provide • any information rewired by the Code shall • not constitute a wti 'er of the applicabla standards or 'requirements. Xt is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the v Development Code or ask any q .f;estions of City staff relative to do,. ,remente prior to submitting an applications • Anrot y pp , �� pplication id to be submitted . '°a a than six ar onthe conference this of application co;aaferen�cee pleas., mor deemed i,z<n lecesear�,/ by the Panning . unless the second conference �.:� d Division Page kits4NINO ► VISION P ; ONg 639-4171 Y.' PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the . pre- application conference is to: (i) identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (ii) to provide, City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant including identifying who will be the final. decision nia]er for the application. The extent of public improvements and dedications to be required of the applicant will be res o vended by City staff and approved by the ;appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decieion maker by .City staff until all commenting ag nciea, City staff p had an opportunity toereavie rrr and ctcon of on the and the public have h application. The following comments are p► j p improvement related requirements that may be required a - a condition of development approval for your project. Richt -of -we dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights- of,way to the ultimate functional street classification ri g hts-of -wa y width specified by the Community Development Code development application ,Lice tion for this site Will require �.pproval of a epelo ' ent' a dedication of right-of-way for 1. (N4L to P..!) t fr ®sa centerline. &1th5O'to e LX) 440 4 i� feet ' t e bee n Sec._ a ( ► 601406 d 04 along r r?, . street improvements will be necessary alon � Street 3.mprove►etss s ' 10 "—street improvements will be necessary ed street improvements wi. include feet of ` pavement 3 d Needed from centerline, curb and gutters , storm severs, a five-foot wide, sidewalk, necessary street signs, .�treetligbtss, and year two Ye streetlight ing fee. In e�.�me cases where street improvenen'ce or other necesear'y public 1, the street improv µ ,t , . may be s a Condit n of develop n .: "ppr aval a the str reement which waivea geinst the formation of a local improvements are not currentl deferred. In these cases, property oteler (a) must exec to a non -remo the property owner's right t ;; ,sager' p i.ct f orsned to i.lprove improvement dxa� +ax 1:y 2. Pedestrianways /bi kewaye ivftimowal San tar Sewersa The closest sanitary ,sewer to this 'inch line located at development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It responsibility to extend the sse Wer along tha proposed storm seERE im rroyemente property to Uu. The propoeec is the developfo)e a e devOlopment site a s, ��y p � "f- ��yy1 • Jy µi't `Y JI i.- 42 �1 "�,. 1a 0..n � •x �!'�,'_�. ��1��M�`_rM' , �.a� aL i� "�h �.4� � s�_n ^��ir ��; �, Page 1 s , iaabn:~ Dist " : 4554 provides pahlic water service Ln the arsa a this site. The District ct should be ccntectel, for inf ormation rQgar� .ing e supply for :your pr'opssed development. Fire Protection: Protecti�ne Tualatin Valley Fire and Regt:ue 4 Contagt « eene $3rchilprovides fire protection serviceo. wait a Ln the t.1 ty of �. a �4� -8�J� � p c ntacted for inftermat i�+n re and ,.4g the Tigard. The �istr��--t should be c adequacy cixcit Latacn eyetems, the aeed fob fine hydx antf3 or other'. questions related ,to fire protection. Other° .ige yLCJ P'c. l is TRAVPZO I PACT FE1 S g y crxe the.d ed the 1n �Piu, st � 1�+�� the �ash"i c1e anal x�f .�c ��' �'�rdin�7� eionerrs ado��uxe to. • a� g�aen � �� t � ®axe •of Ccit�ie ... courat��»wrde �xaf � �c Ship � �hia��to�n ��xntv �n September, 1990, tae Wa the T�ash�n�tc�n C ®untj� voters. ," ,� � � thaw ®�t��acut a p TIP pee e1.e�ctoxa'�e �avexcaMelaao�.mc�a�r p roves e�par►dia�� h ". ' �ti® ` ,3.ni�+n, ef�ect sawn all, jurisdictions within the county Thie a n' p ant � t . eefe ttan 3.xtcaeeasec� etas eoi� w � �.l �� a�caun� a ��'� e on dev�lvgznaent � fe �o xa�� Coun ty b The t ;it of Ti ard. ties a�dopta d'1 Y p! g The C& LI Traf fic s�aot Fee p r� �ra� w� l c llec f s from ne develo aent . based vwn the development ° s projected impact on the trans rtation syetem. Developing pro rtiea will he regzired to pad' ed on t bade r type of M , call l�a�ed on the nr�lbe:� df tn: �.� s " they a:e p�: � ne�. ate b T�►@ TIP �,� ��,e . T�� ®ha�.� c eciar<d. tca age use, size of project, and a generb *al use based . fee catego . t �.ssunnce 7;t� lim�.ted be calculated at time of building perm � t y t �9be deferred u it �ix+c�wstancea, pa�s+neznit e� ths� �'��' ran be�sfl��e�ntca b�i1 a,,,Ccu�aancy , .�,s issuance of occupancy- permit. Deferral p rs 4 �.® c�rreater than $5 o d8�9 na.ssiol.� mnly awhen t�� ' Of) STORMWWATER ALXTY FER8 .. ,� s �,a eet to the un led Sowers �e Assn has establish... And the City ha 98 4 Surfacer Wat: r t �geei ent, lationer ., mercer �e�olut�.on No � ��,,, requiring the constr fiction ,o on -site water Qu e ;4. The teeolution requires that Y construction of .a water 1,uality acility he bt1to The 4 Ap _ . „„,,. ” outer , for a squa re feet Or n ®0. The ditj cf T g� x , . - ,, thereof,: th® fee sha��,l be $375. cx.' 3.t eha3.7� he S'AELT OPENING PE IT -waA r�ha11 . cbr lance until the apZala.cant No work thin a eetio e in g pe y e rYats obtaii8ed i1 t�t,C rnn�.t it ®ate the En nee FINISH D FLOOR R. la Yl y 1 �;ui�T:�a to . �"I6�P�'S ng p t appli "caht shal . • p lot wh�i.ch eh . e Cn d1�.�. Q�'O� tkd w�wth s3 dl � p,larn a�ty�p3�ca,7� f].oar lan for each t�.cas�s�a hav . .. p e.ev the elevations of fours corcners� Oaf that l,�n along w t corner of eacb lot a JO :'PlIEAPP MS's' PREPMED SY ' 6 ;NGXN? NR$NG DIV SIOI PHONv : 6 9.4171 3; Page 8 c ry OF TIGARD tUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM fd APPLICATION CHECK (LIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of applicatiOn submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is your PP' This sheet B�UB'B' be brought required to be submitted with your application. ._.. and submitted with all' other materials at the time You submit your applicatOro. See your application for further explanation of these itefs or call Planning at 630-4171. ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: BASIC MATERIAL. A) Application fora (1 copy) authorization 13) Owner's sighaatureforitten author•i C) Title transfer instrument D) Assessor's asap E) Plot or site plan F) Applicant's statement .(H) Filing fee ($ SPECIFIC MATERIALS Site I f olrmation s�hotdi m (No . of copies 1') Vicinity Map 2) Site size & dimensions 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-1 or , ft for grades 9 ) patterns, course 4) Drainage pa , and ponds s 5) Locations of natural hazard areas iracldding: 3 a) Floodplain areas 3 b) Slopes in excess of 2 E. 3 c) Unstable ground d) Areas with hngh seasonal water table ( 3 e) Areas a with � severe sol erosion potential C 3 f) Areas 'haying seveorely weak foundation soils � , ' [ ) . Ccmprehens iVe Location of resource�ea as shown on the I1a invcntory including: a) Wildlife habitats ( 3 b) Wetland ( 3 7) Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings b) Trees with t ) th 6" + caliper 4 feet from ground log►' l 8) Location of existing str3 • r uses C � � a.B�d�dai"� -mss' and thle7t [ 3 9) Location and type of on sources • off—site noise so am 10) io . utilities and nts t 3 existing �atxlta d easements .rX 1£1 Location of ea�xsin w� + 11) Location of existing dedicated right—of—ways ( 1 y an (t o. of copies .�..... ) • uo 3 1) _ rot P�:ara show .� ,. The proposed site and surrounding properties ( 3 g Site "UeV�IaC��te . 2) Cont*er line intervals 3 3 ) The location, dimensions a nd names of al a ) Existing . p latted streets & other Public ay s and easements on the site ar8 on adjoining 1 properties N APPLICATIO � GHEGRLYSI' -- 'Page � 'sae ` "` �• b) • ropo sed streets or other publi ? aysP & easemen,:s on the site. c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension The: location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site b) Parking and circulation areas . c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor, common areas, f) Abode ground utilities The location, dimensions & setback distances of a11: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site b) Proposed 'structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage 1'acilit.ies and analysis of downstream conditions 7) eanitary sewer facilities The location of areas toµ4 be .andscaped e. � � Y 9) The location and type s ou• door lighting considering crime prevention .techniques 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation 12) Lxisting or pra po spd suer reimbu rsement agreements' C) GrParr (No, of .copies .,.�....) The site development plan slrail1 include .a grading plan at the same scale AS the site anallysis drawings and sha'tl contain the following information. . 1) The location and extent to which grading will take, place indicating general contour lines, slope. ratios and soil stabilization prposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. 2) A statthment from 'a registered en' inder supported by data factual substantiating a) Subsurface exploration afte, geotechnical engineering report, �. i b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service prop-asals c) That all proble res will be mitigated and ha,, they will be mitigated )) rchitectural ®ojwi igs ([ o. of Copies The site deve;lopmen,t plan proposal shall include: 1) • Floor plans end i catini nrJ square ts a of all' structures proposed for ease on -site; and L ., 2) Typical elevatelevation cprawan g. s of each structure. E) i.andscapE PAan, (Oo= of copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same . scale of •the situ anulysis plan or a•larger scale if necessary and shall indicates 1) Description of the 'irrigation system wheee applicable, 2) Location l and height of fences, buffet and screenings 31' 3) L‘`, ion oe terraces, decks. she1te' p; areas and common open spates 4) Location, typo, size and species of existing and proposed 3 goosed' plant materials. The 1 r4scape plan shad.'' include a narrative which :iddrosses: 1) Soil conditions. I ' 2) Erosion control measures that will be used G $non ®raWangs sign drawings shall be submitted in accordahce ;with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. V) ',�.r i , W9,efera$io s. est llg [ 3 H) Preliainar rtition or lot line dustment JaoLIw22wfnI, (No. of Copies ): 1) The owner of the subject parcel ( 1 2) The Owner's authorized agent [ ) 3) The map scale. (20 5 ,.100 or 200 feet=*). inch north arrow and date 1 3 A) Description of parcel location~ and boundaries: "5) Location, width and namas Of streets, easements and, other public warts within and adjacent to the. parcel [ 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and.withiri 25 feet cif • aI l property Rives C 1 .7) Lecation and width of all wt>,ter courses [ 3 8) . Location of any trees with 6" or grea$er caliper at 4 feet above ground level. ) 9) All slopes greater .than, 25% ( 3 10) Location of existing. utilities arad utiiita easements t 3 1 ,.) FOB major land partition which creates a public street: a) . The proposed r fight po ,oay 1ocatiorn and Width [ , w b) A scaled 'cross-- seetioh of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ' t 3 12 X Any applicable deed resrictions [ 3 ., i 13) Evidence that Viand rta��.on wit/ not preclude efficient fut ure la nd di ii si orn where a ppl` icabRe � � Subdivision Pre...irnireah� .' pint and data showin (13o, of Copies y , ),;45— 1) Scale equaling 30,50, 100 or 206" feet to the inch and 1imit.od to one phase per sheet 2) The proposed name of the subd i V i s ion 3) Vicinity mao showing property ° s relationship to ' -rterial and collector streets 4' Names, addresses and telep Bone nunbers of the owner developer„ engineer, surveyor, de5ignerr, as apl Ucable 5) Date of applicati9n 6) Boundary aI24es ° Pf,tt*act"tei%biii6fidiVided Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoinin g parcels of unsubdivided . land, Contour lines related to a cityt-established bench- mark at 2 --foot intervals for 6-10% Oradea greater than LO% The purpose, location, type and size of all of . the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision) : 1 4) Public and private right—of—Ways and easements E b). Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines c) Domesti w water mains xr + iuding' fire hydrants. d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) 3 e) Watercourses C �] f) Deed reservati r,s for parrs, open space, p ithwtys and other land encumbrances 10) Approximate pbn and profiles of proposed sanitary and g store sewers with grades and pipe . e. sizes indicated 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution syster, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire 'hydrants 12) Approximate Centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extersi+ns for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision. 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right—of—way; 14) The location of all arhas subject to inundation or storm water overflow '9_c) Location, width and direction of flow of all water~- courses and drainage ways le) 16) The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and let numbers. there 10 s are .to' be ` shall be d upon such lots b�ntaai., it used for purposes, other than ra,�s�� indicate p ' 17) The location, of all trees +wl h a diameter 6 inches oe gre ttee measured at 4 feet above ground level,. and the 'location of proposed tree plantings, if any 16) The existing uses of the property, a .including the location of all structUres and thrr` present uses of the stru ttur, !s, and a statement of which structures are to remain al=ter platting 19) Supplemental information including a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) 1 ) b) ' Proof of property ownership C 3 c) f proposed plan for provision of a,, subd v i s ian improverments'w i 2d ). Existing natt ural features including rock out- croppings, wetlands and marsh areas. C 3 21) If ...an; of the foregoing information.' cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be i hcor p yra '; d into a narrative and submitted with the application. (2362P/0020P) APPLTCATTgN CHECK .EST '— Page i y t w y �•�.1 hhp 20. CITY DEPA ME 20'i'IPXCP,.aI0N LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS opieas ... Building coa`fioial /Brad R. t"y Reaoore= SnginooringfChria D. Permits Coordinator/Viola 0. 3. SPECIAL DIBTRX 8 ire ,District (Pick -up box) Tigard Water District 6777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OA 97223 P ''km 4 Recreation Board °lace l ieild Operations School Dint No.. 40 (Beaverton) Po xe :hi Or o:2 vorton OR 97075 School Diet.. 23J (Tigard) 13137 SW Pacific fwr. Tigard, OR 97227 Tualatin Valley Water District .�.n-6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use 4 Transp. 250 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Martha Wavle Martin ,, Joann Rica •�• Scott King •» Fred Eberle ----Mike Borreaaon City of Bravarton ----- Jim fonds PO Bog 4755 Beavertan, OR 97076 City of Ring City City 'Manager 15300 8W 116th Bing City( OR 97224 City of Fake Oswego City Hating= 360 8W A Lake Oswego, OR 97034 State Highway Division '"_.. Loo Doran PO Sett 25412 Portland, OR 7225-04412 APBCYO3i AOBBCIES boundary Cosswinsion ' --- 320 SW Stark Room 530 Portland, OR 97204 General Telephone it n Wolin 4460 SW Hain Si.. 'igard, OR 97223 NW i 1atUral e+`'ao Scott Palmer 220 t2 Se'.:aYM Ave. Portland, OA 97209 TO/ Cahbleovivion of Oregon !like Rallock .. _ 3500 SR Board St. Portland, OR 97201 Colu0bia C4abla „ ( Frank Stone) 14200 Sol Brigadoon Ct. Beaverton( OR 97005 DLCO (CPA's only) 1175 Court At. NB Salem, OR 97310 -0590 Other City of Durham "'°a' City Manager 17160 SW Upper BOOMS Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland °-"" P300ning Director 1120 SW 5th Portletdp OR 97204 ODOW ild°ieann Rahne�annn 0002 SS Nato a�jin972 21vd. Milwaukie, 0 97221' Portland General Blau. Br ann Yloora� C 35 8 O3d Scholia Fry. eaVen►n:toEn, OR 97007 _ fro Area ConmunACationasy Jason Hewitt Twain Oaks Technology Cantor 1615 82 169th Place 8 -6020 E3 ®a Vop ton OR 97006' -4006 Ud Want Patm ,Deal eon 421 ,SW Oak ht. . Portla ha, 0A 07204 6. STATE 102X. S Aeronautics Div. (0002) gaging= board of health Fier 4 ldligro, Parks 8 Recreation Div. llaibdiv aiof Ouperviior Dapt. of Energy - Dept, Of Buv►iron. Quality 7 F2DEBAL AOBNCIES DOS II ..""".' »iviaoion o (ute► Land° doneerce Dept. - M.2. Park taTIBM On thaki' Pacific Traeuneportaation dampaaY Du6una 1610 Formal, PLS Proja t Buginenar 800 hit 6th* NMannaa, R. 324, Union St atiOn Port0d8, Oh 97209 12/3.^,9/91 CO1..ENTS ON PROPOSED "MARION ESTATES": 1. T he proposed street layout does not comply with t ',.e Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map, as the intersection Irlth 100th Avenue is too far south See Note 10 from the recent Map revision (copy attached). 2. It w ha p that the Ma p revision that created Note 10 has been appealed to LUBA. A decision is expected from LUBA within the net month. Although the LUBA appeals related Primarily to 109th Avenue, there is still a possibility that a LUBA rui.,incj could lead to further changes to Note 10. The applicant should check on the Map status before proceeding with formal btittft1 d . 3. Although we understand that the owner of T.L. 1 601 opposes a road along boundary of T.L. 1601, I do not find this to be adequate treason t ore reject the route s ecii ied by Note 10. It is � p I,�' likely that the property owners to the south of the p y h proposed subdivision would a7,,o oppose a road along their property line. We heard those concern& during consideration of the Transportation Map amendments. AlternAltive layouts should be reviewed. 4. NPO #6 was the sponsor cf the recent Map amendments. The NPO has y process for the street been very involved in the planning p system. I would strongly recommend that the applicant work rk with the NPO to review s °ion design alternatives rior to submitting a formal application. 5 Note 10 specifically prov. files for reduced design Standards for the minor collector roadway. We can proL)ably support the proposed reduced width of 36 feet. However, it w: ii. still be nee e sary to justify the reduced standards. 6. am willing y hpp ~ coordinate with t he neighbors and with the NPO and to seek ways to justify the reduce design standards, prc,.° aided that the applicants are willing to explore alternative designs. Randy Wo .1 y City Engineer 049' r .ajohe 10114 ,for /600/ 6/0,ho Shulid#10) /^evioied 44112 ` r ' a/ age eho, i ''t x,04 ' 4,e 4,, 46$ 71-14/ iG eivd, , .4 1�,vra ako ,f$ /00,03a.0^; idryotooda r,rl e rehed 0 d 4 if Ie. shg ,044401 )4"' ,9� »y� ��'•�+ '' » _ry"at 5'�_� 46 /ngele "b Sag', i 1164eq ,o e. k4": °A; ..i .r. y I�r t. K:'' h,'`. J / AO A VO4 COMPREHENSIVE PI ikN TRAC PORTATION MAP • NOTES Scholls Ferry Road to be realigned to connect with . Davies Road. Study area to determine a future +onnection between the Walnut/132nd intersection and the ;wards /•121., t intersection. jor col►ector extension of Ama Gaarde Street has been recommended b Y °the Northeast BO Mountain Tra importation Study Report. An indirect connection of minor collectors has been recommended by NPO #3. Approximate alignments; are shown sir, the extensions of 132nd Avenue south of 6 enc-hview Terrace, 135th Avenue soup h of Walnut Street„ and Benchview Terrace,;west of 132nd Avenue. _These s Teets are to be designed as minor collectors with a design speed of 25 m.p.h,. Study area to determine the configuration of a new oo nnpE;`tian between southbound Pacific Highway and Main Street. Study area to d®terrn• ma ►e alig nment nrent of a minor co °ct or street c onnecting Y,. with the Dartmouth Street extension and Parkway near Red Rock 68th at 72nd Avenue vwith the Dartmouth Street extension within with �a�pton Street the westerly portion of the Tigard Triangle. Study area to determine the alignment of connections between I- lighway 217, Kruse Way, 1.5 and the Tigard Triangle. Connections between hlunziker Street, Hall Boulevard at O'Mara Street (generally) and Bonita Rcaadr, Study area to consider extension of Hall Boulevard +uthwarrd o connect with Boons Ferry Road in Tualatin for either pedestrian or vehicular access. 9. (Deleted) 10. An extension of Settler Street from 910th Avenue to 109th Avenue Intersecting h Avenue at, a point approximately 200 feet north of the existing Settler Street intersection. An extension and realignment of 109th Avenue south of the S. aie r Street ... e_ xte-. ns• o r, VI intersect Pacific "• g, hv vay at Royalty Parkway. The realigned 109th Avenue shall �ntersa c Naeve tre®at a point approximately 250 feet to 450 feet east Pacific Highway. The design of the Battler Street extension may VP from the adopted City standards for minor collectors. VISITOR® S AGE 1DA O e;3 e,. 10480 S.W. Highland Drive, Tigard, OR ee' v d to testify before Council deliberation o 7 atkincr Restriction Ordinance -- Hlgh'Land Dr Terry an out- Amendment. Triangle a area is c Council rece development o was advised to to talk about re len, 245 S W. 2nd Street, Sherwood, OR sequence consideration of a Co mprehe or zoning of property he owns in a. Mayor and City Administrator ntly being reviewed by the ly author zed a consu;Ltan Tigard Triangle Master tact the Community D ine. Jane Miller, 10920 noted cars parked wi Tr wn Square property board signs. She asked the sign ordinance. findings to. Council and Highland h '®`or Sa s well he;, Morey Williams, 10225 97224 requested to to Item tem i . 1 (Parki Drive) fy bef Restrict 224 Item ej quested ive Plan e Tigard dvised this y; in fact, agreement for an. Mr. Tol en 1opment Director ve, Tigard, OR 97224, signs on or near the s a number of sandwich this was in violation of will review and report contact Ms. Miller. ighland D.•ive, Tigard, OR e Council on deliberation n Ordinance Highland 16 3. cONSENT AG M •. " on by Councilor = hwartz, seconded by Councilor or Johnson o approve the fall ng Consent Agenda items 3.1 Approve cif. Minutes: July 9, 16, : `• 23, 1591 3.2 Receive d File: Council Ca1end.ar 3.3 Approv w �.:ha Taber of Commerce Lease and ikuth ze 'the Mayor to oS 3.4 Ant r ize City Administrator to enter into a r dement with '.R M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers r water cams study. The tion was approved by a unanimous vote o ' ; :cif leaufair AMENDMENT 4� . �'1�L��__ :CMG - COMPREHENSIVE �'� CA . 01-0002 (NPO A iPO #6 to mend. the comprehensive Plan Transportation Map by designating new minor collector roadways in the Little mull Mountain area. SW 109th Avenue �, would be extended as a minor ca�llector from its current O . ouch of M urdock Street; the extension would curve ac ss the south slo p e of Little Bull Mountain, crossing N eve street west of The Fountains condominium and meeting Pacific CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST' 13 1991 PAGE 3 te laghway opposite the existing intersection of Royalty Park'iay. In addition, a new minor collector street, labeled /ASattler Extension" is proposed to connect between 100 and 109th Avenues at a . location north of floodvie i Drive. The Comprehensive Flan Traespor Cation Map weuld also be amended by charging the designation nation of Naeve Street from ;minor collector to local street. a. Public hearing was opened. b. There were no declarations or chal1engeed City Engineer summarized . the staff report sub r, fitted i the Council packet. the Engineer referred to 'a map of the area,, noted traffic figures projected for the area, ea, and gave a brief synopsis of the O cevr ew��ess City Engineer reported that the NPO review included looking at the possibility of extending existing streets; tb,is idea was discarded, hoeever, because of the steep grades. He responded to Mayor Edwards' questions concerning the level of exploration of utilizing other streets (i.e., E.able versus Battler in the proposed changes. City Cit Engineer reported on the decision making �' decision process and advised impact to existing ting development and fu ture. development was considered. The NPO and Planning Commission recommend approval of the p d p pro oee Comprehensive lan. Transportation Map amendment p Sue Carver, , Chair ' f N PO 6, reviewed the process which concl.. ded with the recommendation now before Council She noted the initiation of this proposal was as a result of the Triad development proposal. When Triad' 5 request was to ned down, the NPO saw the opportunity to plan for a road system prior to development. Th is proposed con pr. ehensa vs plan amendment, Ms. Carver 3dVa,ee4y CeceiTed approval from, Oregon. Depa.rtment Tr p watior She advised that the majority of people in contact with her through the p�C,�da l�i� advised that the compromise on the tr'if f is pattern in the area was acceptable. Mayor Edwards discussed the process With Ms. Carver. In response to his questioning, Ms. Carver advised that City �ar'�e �a4�.v Staff had been present at every meeting where thts issue was di s;aesrd over the last seven months. There was discussion on upgrading /C ab l e and Foovi : W Streets and whether �ploxed f al ly . The des ire of the NPO was to open tip as many rotes as rossible to diffuse the traffic. .� AUGUST 13 , 1d09l PAet 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING �� col City Engineer noted the upgrade to Kable and Hoodview Streets would be d ,tf ,cul.t. Kable and Roodvi.ew are developed residential areas uu^rW r Graham, 9410 S.W. Lakeside Drive, Tigard, ',)regcla, testified that he watb President of the Summerfiald Civvic Association Board of Directors. He advised they strongly indorsed the proposal. He commended the NPO and City Staff on their conclusions. Richard Watson,, 102,90 S.W. Highland Drive, Tigard, eregon, advised he was in support of the proposal. He 'advised it appeared to be a workable s+ is i 'i noting the need to look to future growth and for reasonable and safe access for this area to Pacific Highway. Ross Woods, P. O. Box 880 0, Seattle, WA 9 ... support of the proposal. He advised he would like to see the turmoil over the transportation issues would h this area, end and noted with development in the area, a great portion of the transportation improvements could be built with developer dollars. lie na' sd that a portion of the improvements would probably be eligible for funding under the Transportation Improvement Fund program through Washington County. Bev Froude, 12200 S. Wm Bull Mountain Roo o Tigard, Oregon, advised she was the NPO 3 representative; NPO 3 voted unanimously in support of the proposal. The NPO feels it is a good compzomise. The Mk: advocates a change to the plan: They 7=earuest that Naeve Road be clo.ed at Highway 99 rather than have a right -hand turn lane. The major concern of NPO 3 is that all of the road should . be built if Triad develops their property. ("both the northern part be opened and the new extension to Royalty Parkway �be built as a condition .of the develo cent... 6a Ms Fr ode noted Settler Road ,.�n�aul,d 1aot be required t �, s o be built ass there have been no plans g brought oath to f develop this property. Coeecilor 3ohmisor question, ed the recommendation of the c1os,° gre 0f Naeve '�o�.cl a t l�[ighway 99 . ,n� q F'roude responded it was tor safety considerations and cited ing which fic probleiz , s acn as accidents and the stop lights are not s ,1chron ,ze l on Highway 99. : iAghes, 8485 S.W. Tolman Street.it Portland, Oregon, approximately ` irepresenting the f!an11y. which owns aC� �'iseCZ he �a5 r five adres a� • . anect1on to � the proposed t..or Pacific Highway. He advised that it was his MINUTES °, AUGUST � 3, 1991. -- PAGE CITY COUNCIL �� T�'i .� lam: n ,q • 0 •' „ yam • • • • • . 0 � O• sok underStanding that it was very likely property would be develo Pe'� *.t up the road much taster than the his client's cemmercial property would be , developed He said this dovetailed with the previous testimony requesting that the whole road be developed at the same time He noted City Engineer's comments that there may be ways to fund the road before development. Mr. Hughes advised that his client's property has, been for sale. for several years for commercial. purposes and no imminent prospects have been identified. Increase` density up above may increase interest in client's property. He advised his client would not have the ability to fund improvements to the road without development identified at the same tine. • Mayor Edwards asked City Engineer to clarify his earlier Connments on funding. City Engineer responded that one Of the options discussed was the "reimbursement mbursemnent district concept" wherein publ:tc funds could be used and development would pay its share later as development occurred. In ,response to Councilor Schwartz, City Engineer ' responded that public righteo -way would need to eeie ,acquired and if the City was b uildir,,g dead of development, t, tl!e City would have to pay for the right -of - way. This may be part of the rei »bareuble costs. Dennis Odman, 621 S.W. Morrison, Portland, Oregon, advised he represented fir. Ferd Wardin who owns the largest section of land that the proposed Settler Extension wou ld cross. He noted that even though the road was shoe in approximate placement this would greatly impact Mr. Wardin's property because of existing housing and development. Mr. Wardin .in is opposed to to Sattler Extension of the proposal and its status being changed to a minor collector. Mr. Odman referred to his letter of August 9, 1991, • outlining his client ' s Cox��.erTns with the coon rchernsive p ®®fie notified of the ��aane��n �..,�ia�1► ��h�.s l.� erne had riot been e + letter o G L1te�9. is oh file with the packet meeting material, There was brief di.scu.ssion nth Coaalr►cil.or Johns,or Mayor Edwards en the impact to Mr. Wardin and future Mai p development plans john s.. ..: �: 1.a0��ect ®ns� to theree� � osa�ard't, OH laughte. . , g • . 4' `�9"�2 liter noted his obj p p _ .._ 24 Te _ d he had not been He sal ,d K le and �i.a'g. advise Hoodvriew were already tide streets arid advised that Viable could k e extended with less prob1eta than what was being ITIt COUNCIL kitETING AUGUST 13 , 1991 = PAG ► 6 1 4,. irg proposed. He noted cosy. of construction for the p roposed streets would be tremendous There was discussion with Councilor Johnson concerning' wing the placement of the Sattler Street Extension alignment on the map. The road design and placement would be determined development is proposed. i�ned ;at the time a dev Jame C. Szaboryt 15435 S.W. 114th Court, #101, Tigard, Oregon signed in to testify, but declined to make any comments. Al Erickson, a��( S.W. S�. � O9t h, Tigard, Oregon testified in opposition. He said that utilization of Murdock Street would be morn logical. He does not event. the proposed improvements to go through his property and said he prefers the gravel road on Naeve Street. Larry and Laura Carotski, 10305 S.W. Hoodview Drivel Tigard, Oreg or cited agreement ' most of the testimony heard oositiw While agreeing with long-range planning,, there was no clear indication of who would be served ;4; , the Satter extension. Tom Gilllhan, 10275 S.W. Hoodview, Tigard, Oregon, testified against the Sattler extension, noting that he thought this was premature. Marge Daneg.poxt, 15100 S.W. 103tn Tigard, Oregcn,, advised she was not opposed to long-range planning but this ro osal had not been given enough considera�cion. p p She said the proposal was not well thought out and 1',here were too many problem; the concerns cif the neighbors had not br,t adequately considered. She said she had contacted, the State Highway r e artment detector for this area who indicated tae were not aware of discussions for a connection from this area �- ' ea to Beef Bend Road. Nd p a. c projections given by the Ms. » L�a�'erport disputed trf f i City Engineer and advised the figure w; u1d b ' higher. she advised of traffic safety concerns. Ms. Davenport mated concerns with property near Pacific Highway drawing attention to how this �orcperty ��uld be �! � ,gy affected if divided as shown on the map. ; said iderat +ion had been Ms. Davenport aa.d, that not enough cons alleviate traffic the area. in � to Kahle She not�,��tha� some of the NPO 6 peers lived on these street 5. CITY COUNCIL MEETING • • City Engineer, at Councilor Schwartz ' s request, responded that he had been in contact with and received the information for his report to Council fro !4r. Don Adams of °DOT ,. ` Mr Adams ie the Region Engineer for ODOT; to go higher; the director in Salem would have to be contacted. Traffic figures are dependent on the number of apartments built at the Triad site. Clyde Roarke, 15371 S.W. 9.14th, #108, advised he livers at the Fountains Condominiums in Su Dmerfi,eid `And does not: support the proposal. When they bought their property the plan oa1led f er the property adjacent to be commercially cti(tvelopee with traffic flowing on NNaeve. The road from Royalty Parkway ay to access Naeve w ol require a five recreant grade . P� of • ection , he , would for 1,000 cars per day which would pass by their houses. He . cited that the major or reason 'for the road to Royalty Parkway is because the State does not want to put a traffic Signal at Naeve Road on Highway 99. He suggested the city could use its influence to pat in a traffic signal at Naeve Road. He said the facts do notxsta.fy the expense for putting' a , road is. re and causing the negative impact to the property owners Enm y Lon Lawrence,' 15085 S.W. 100t1 Tigard, Oregon advised her family formerly ocamee, the Wardin property. She noted concerns With notification process. She advised the property no owned by Mr. Wardin should be developed a manner that Would be Allowed to be . in pleasing. Rebuttal NPO Sue Carver responded to cOents presented during public testiliton y . With regard to previous testimon she noted no Member of the NPO 11w.d on liable Street and one member lives o floodv'iew. The followin,.. written test . .; g a��any had been s�ubtted to the Co •. (this y .. ` c . . . i... '. a litre .,_ until. tTh�.s �atez �,a.� z s ,gin addition to the 7.etters attached to the staff °tpert which mere subnnitted ' lath the Council packet) Augu S t 9, 19.9. le tter from Be hi ] S Mn o an Atorn:lt fret Alien, FelloWst LiV in stun G el Atig t 8; 1991 �� t�er fr�A� kober and Mars Luton August 12, 1991 1ett.e.x from Robes °t C. Luton City Engineer noted he had spoken wi 4h Hr. L1,1tr. n by telephone on 8/12/91 to an..wer questa.ons. August 80 1991 letter from Leno re A. Schuster CITY COUNCIL NEgTING n.. INUm VES AEGJST 1991 PAGE Recommendation by Staff: City Engineer noted the history Of discussions concerning traffic in the neighborhood with no obviouG or easy solutions. The recomrsendation before Council tonight may not have been the one selected if there •vere not already existing development and streets in the neighborhood. Staff supports the reoommendatim of the NPO as tine best: solution with the current situation. There are areas of concern which need further study and detail.eid engineering at the time of development. Impacts on adjoining properties of how to best fit the rods with proposed development: must be addressed. This will be provided for during the hearings process with potential appeals to the City Council. City Engineer advised that the plan proposed by the NPO addresses concerns heard with regard to trying to provide good access to developing properties while still protecting the already developed properties from through traffic. The plan proVides good circulation and addresses emergency vehicle access through the neighborhood and protecting Highway 99W from adding more entrances. He advised that the State was recommending that the number of entrances be diminishec:1 to protect the safety and capacity of Highway 99w. From staff's review in working rei.th the State, past 41 developers,, and with the NPO, staff feels the plan meets necessary criteria as well as any mans submitted and staff recoumiends approval. In response to a question from Councilor JOhnson, City Engineer responded that the Settler extens:Iton would be near the north property 1.ine. He noted the substandard jog in the alignment te the south which was necessary because if it were to go farther north, it would impact existing development. Consideration wee given to how the property could be developed, given the zoning designation in the area. f. PUblic hearing Vas closed, g. Council CoMentS. Council discussed, at length, tOte, area involved and included in -their reiaarks consideration of . to the no101410thood . artd saSdeltAitia the depth or oohsideratien given to 4dd*.tiona1 rou:tes rorHthe'ratiPottatiOh:tVbtett ix this area CITY COUNCIL MEETING L ECLIB1L STR!P o .. q Councilor Johne,on n' oted NPO 6"s effort to be proactive, that 1s a they attempted to plan long -range ter transportation 'rtation n the area. She cited the need to Consider Hocidview and 'Kahle extensions to the west. (It was noted during discussion that local streets are not shown on the Transportation Map.) She advised she was - ' minor ndation on Sattler �,,i. pt�st C;,��'�II� ®�t �� .�'ni�ted tc"'AS c7, e collector bit, in appeared that this was the better Street to weighing testimony, it agp alternative vihen attempting to diffuse traffic impact in the neighborhood. Edwards advised that, although he coma ended the NPO Mayor ' � g support • • s q re , the for 1 p work this issue, '�y could .. q,{. q the their wo.L� on 4�h.e. �J i'u a'��7 �44e he M ��u6 not . in {+he proposal. H said all. roads sboUld be opened to share in the transportatiof'. area for all neighborhoods needs. the Murdock /Hoodwiew/Kable . He was concerned t��,t in the future could be utilized more fully ;planning to share �r the traffic ,increases. Councilor Schwartz advised that he felt the NP® had "i0oked at all alternatives carefully and, given the current development and terrain, the proposal before CoUncil was one which he could support., and noted Settler Street extensa. ®n �� nr��e concerns with the Sattl .. collector. re�commenda t on that this street be a minor followed on the ier Street a ctension. Sate .. . Council e n r eased a desire language on "Note 10 :,ou�'acll. a d,_.s�.re to amend l,.an: a ..n uld of the proposed map. The P� ,y, _ owner (s) of eXZbi�.a.t � in 4° give land. � � b <_ to g ive the property Developing the Council recessed meeting to give legal eased the �eeta.n at l� � �� p.m. counsel , and staff the opportunity Note to . craft language reflecting Council's intent for Teat eting was reconvened at 10:12 p.m. Motion by Councilor Jthnson; seconded by Councilor ,f Schwartz, to amended Note 10 as follows: "The design of the rattler Street extension mr:y vary from tthe adopted City standards for minor collectors." ti reed by a 2 °1 vote; Mayor Edward s The motion was aPp y voted "' " CITY COUNCIL MEETING Ml N3JTES AUGUa'1. 13 1991 PAGE 10 4 •' k li. ORDINANCE NO. 91 -22 AN ORDIN_',NCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT `E PLAN TRANSPORTATION NAP BY TO THE '.�,°��iA�D COMPREHENSIVE Ia CHA GINO DESIGNATION OF NAEVE STREET FROM MINOR COLLECTOR TO LOCAL AND BY ADDING MINOR COLLECTOR CONNECTIONS FROM 109TH AVENUE AT MURDOCK STREET TO PACIFIC HIGHWAY .. 9TH OPPOSITE ROYALTY PARKWAY BETWEEN 100TH AND � � 2 REQUESTED A'�TENTJES NORTH OF H4C�DV.� _ DRI�'g ( CPA 91-0002) BY NPO 6) Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor • - amended. Johnson, to a P� ®v� Ordinance No. 9 �: 2 � a � �, as a]n Ordinance was approved by a 2-1 vote; Mayor Edwards voted °°No. °° SION 9�L 0008 FOUR' *�►"°* � .,..gyp -,._ • D (�11+iS�ttJCTION (N� 2) City • "'lag ig +=-- �--�,� review of Hearings Officer decision a. ; enn . .ivision SUB 91 -0008 Four D Construction s ect to c ton No. 1.a regarding the improvement 0 y.. ' SW Walnut ( 4.5 /ac' ) LOCATION. S,�dr . ° ZONE: R-4.5 ��3Slden'�1.a1, South de of SW Walnut Street, south and ,e, �t of SW 116th 4r0 900. S 1000) Avenue. ('�1C:'T`-� 25�. 3A�s a tax " l.otl.. aJ. ; a � ,. APPLICAB ilaviEW CRITERIA. Tigard Co, unity Development. chapters .x.c 4 60 s and 18.164 C. Public he There were no g was opened claratione' City Engineer s amend the Hearing to require half s t Walnut Street. The . e i developer the chow signing a waiver Of re Walnut Street Y.o dm the Co' and City requit 4 :ue1its dif i e + Y{�'I�� d. ub �p Test' .9.est • ony s ized •r challenges. staff recommended that CoUnci1 er decision on this sttbd visaen iuprovementA to a portion of � � � � o� *ems .�nfeS or ings Officer ; decision al��ag street imps. strance . This portion of 's jurisdiction and County r Dal Or Deharpport 6767 S ou, advised he as the p petty. He recounted th fferirg City and County l: e G s l.ti.ng _ confusion. He advised 200 feet of right-of-Way improVe would not serve to benefit the c recommended that a no- n renons rance endorsed by him, as the de3elJ E ar,',';: etanadards of improvements on Walnut Street be done; at County requirements' 158th, Beaverton, developer on the history of the ements and the t to have this at this time unity. He eemaent be With the CITY Co UI�t;:�gL i�EETiNG MINUTES �- AUGUST 13i 1991 � l ` PAGE • [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]