Loading...
CPA 13-83 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. rk L IL PA 13- 3 C'Arr of & AU anta "--"*" 4 • 1b1icics and Strategies Policy Nb. } w • I a' 9•" I I li' ' I e� r II I I I : I I I I `a I I I I I I I I I n III I Air • • • 1 II I I I I • • I I I I � � I I 9 I� II I II I 1 i I I ' I I I „ I I I I I ' I I r I I i • I II II • I I f1, I I I I I II r , ll I I I I I I I I I IJ II I I I I 1, ,• I / f I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I � I I I 1 I I I I I I y, I I I �' Pp r I .aI »Is I I I I I I I _ t I I r A • Irl � 6 F ,..5 r , 1 , 0- ,. Iyyyy r r � f • La,),,,,e 6,2,-.04/0P.) f• r a I � I ` AA ,!' pF Mir it,• , 7) , ,''"o tl tw, '., 4*. . 00,Th / i (,,,,,,,,,o,...,,,, Alp- t,'I-,...,0//0' ' 0 '''. it/ if'''''''''74‘)0,11'.2(.° �' .ter .1 a ', 4 ' �. • II tri•. it' t/ 67'� I � �I I 1 1. 3 • I , .. � wrat„«• I { r _l I rY I I • ` r 'j ' (L /'fie ,,✓/ c C I Mme. . c I .• ..�"• r I e ,Fr .r I `f ;4, II t i),,t `(y I Y r t '" T, ,e5'1 v, r I I. Ye'''' �' WWF I li I I ' r II I Y a w �r I r -' '' - ,,,..' '''''' ..,., 1 i ' ''''/A y/. '',71'/ 41/4'0 l'•'.4 ea."?'e*,.. c 610.1.1/ *., ( / i' N r Y' � i i MHS I Mr, 'i i 1 ) 1 Mr I i , t fff"'I . ' t t / 1 e N i, e,,, 4 e,V? '‘,0 le )„,/,,e i I I ,d" r� I II I I x ; �fi. r 4 I_ W' I I "4,,,, ii, ,,c,; ei,/:),,,, A .' lo, ,,,k...,,f i a jt,,,,,,,,,)'$1,/,,tviiy 41. 1,/, lit-t I I y I II • I r I ew. II I I I � a 01 1 �* ›,,"'It4 III_ � I I I I I ' I ,,,el / I I I I rl I I, III I I I I I I I I I II �n a6u:� „,, / r -. .,, mo” -.., I I III II �I'I 1E,44, I I I. I . I I I I� .,:u:. :i I ,.,... ..... ,:.f;.: •,vnr ".—.w•.w...=wn�••.�..,,........ - .. ,�' !.� , tf�f y ..r .rdll•wMu•re•.r" 1 . .ems � ,,,' 1" - w"Y • r • r m v r rvr•..ur .... u r t 1 . I k „,� �,, �, � ''�✓! �'�� '+fit �` �' ',�o � �°' tr�r'l � �'” ��''' ) ,. I ,7I �+ ,e;11 ,(I I i P t I het". ) � T " r121 • I I I I � , I I � r f , e et I • I I I I .. Gam" II I 'I. I . I i II I � , I I I � I I I I , I I. I � I I f I Ii I I • ,I I i I1 i I • '' I I I , I I I I Y h �a . I 1 I 'I, L'C rl • II I I , i I Yw, Y I I I II I •, n CD W w moo c)r o C7 t C1 � ti u 1 Cl) �. u) to -• 5 � .�,* e,cc) C--I H • C� • b C) CI a C) b ( m ° t� 6 zrn' -- H. o rt Ce tv Ci,) -' -+ -' t1q 3 o r. hi v •OO CO "n 0 < cn0N.5 oerO D., �� 2 CD 0 ,5:?co c ,) m0 0 -h ,, p m -" `< m-0 0 (I) '•t :r 0 H • = CI 01---' 'w o ,< d.-I,-o cn I O D t.) w >.' M ° pp 0 _ • p _,•c0 .* cn 0 11 X w ) w a• D m c f D n p N•: 1 "Tin w 0 _ co -•�'.w 0 cD , m 0 •< ....4rr m w .' �.co o ..c.:) . -•I '1 o ,.. vi m 1 . a 2 x .,.+,.o to ., . -� m �,. o Cl) t`)�, I m' � �,c- .... cn N p rtilk. *. w p p) m o i q .- D) Ct. 0) 0 -- 13 i ph 1% 'N z 1 , , a .., , co 7:11 0 Ir.,...t. -8. • k tD 1;9» v) to ja 1%. m .� tea• _ Cl . T 1. Q �. N c+D• S' �•f j c...� 1 -i M t to iii 1 • CD /1) 00 0"-4.l 0 _ a b 0 i' — U) i'r w Via.cc , O, Cs CO o- ..,� cn ,... : M ,.%„,P1.IBLIC.1 .AKIN 1%10TIC ,, The,.following wili,, co erecd.by the'l 'PYanning Co ioti,wn 'I'uesda Septemb.r,1�,. 1984;'at 1,10 P.M. at Foo le : un m yt ;r t�..gi�: drool` ,� ' Tigard,Or. e forma tion may"be '"• .. Lecttiire,� uom, I08 5°;S�! Walnut . • • 'v ' M.r , m , .. obtained from the Director,,of Planningand Development at'1755 SW Ash .I� Aero., igard,,Gre 97.223,»or,, callin 639.4171. •• ,�• I 5.1';,Ii ()DMP.FEI ISIVE; �N AI ENDME t ZONE GE 9►; 8� PCM Assoc ,I •�-�� i ./PortIat�d Chan NPD#2; � � �,� W A remand from the, ity Council to the Planning Commission for a Compreheclsive PIan mange from Industrial to General:Commercial m r .; �`r' ��1ha Is Ferry Rd.a Zone change h Co. �u. l Industrial-Light C-3. Located:' 9770 SW � 0 a 0 a j 5.i..: C�},OMPREHEN IV 4:',4;.;1,4.1• : .. > A`l38 r kJohnson NPO 0 ',u.. 'yf, •� /,'..,,,„t,."Iy,".tel.- r.vC . ,�:" t :''''',�?�.,''''., Iij i.:�',•r w .: Op ;,.i A request t amend;p.911041.41,.11,4 2 k a stud 11;,x'.2 b regarding.the W C l 1 4, NAPC�i#:,:'w area+'. Irak:„5 dingy,,,,Policies°and lrimpleinentation Strategies N ,,/ , dow.ument re `tri, 1' °: M,,a'k AA.,a'IMm ': 1' , :, 5.3,. S'UBID IISIOIVP%' w 1k D'r D LOPMEITI'� .+`:SOD Century 21 Sorties NP!)#3 , . '':- -1 request by.Cen,ury 21 P rope tes, c.for a conceptual:and detailed *planapproiral'bf a:Planned Development Which consists of 215 singtd • family units.The property is designated low density residential and is zoned R-7 (PD).Location:.13900 SW 121st Ave..(Wash. Map Co.Tai 2S1 ' 3CC lot 401 and 2S1 4 lot 1400), 5.4 ANNEXATION L ZONE CliANGg2C4.124113,; »VV,79th and Pfalfle; A request by residentiot S.W. 78th Avenue to consider a petition ifori ; annexation to the City 4f Tigard,Also,to assign a low density residreniial . i comprehensive Plan designation and a R-7 zoning designation.Location:i (Wash.co.Tax Map l xS1 36CA tax lots 400,500,600,,700,800,900,1000,', 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400;'2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2000t 2007, 2008, 2009, 4800,4900,5000;5100,E 5201,5300,and 5500), I 'i • ' Written comments,are encouraged.Piense submitwritten comments to the ;' • Director of Planning and Developmen ,.at the above adrlre itt advance of the public.hearing date• . • , I', I TT6200 Publish September.;1,105 , I I . I til. r . A r. •. ' • ' x..mw+wJriNJi`++.,,.'fUUM+m •wwM.Mni+'r+nw'e w + -.! . N a. AGENDA ITEM 5.3 .August 19, 1983, I MEMORANDUM • I • TO Planning Cbmmissia 'ck/I/ 4 FROM': Planning Staf f ✓� I , Agenda,. item 5.3 Ca�r� Johnson sive Plan Amendment SUBd'EC`T. C©an�.�.�cen I I of O, � ti of �1Pre, es n a member # 4 tier, r om Carl Johnson Attached isa �1 eG' ,:.. amendments to the text of the Comprehensive�- P1 an.'° Thepolicy in diwtp`tite is' .. . 11.4, a special area of concern for NPO # 4. ,At their June i, 1983,! meeting NPO 4 voted ,unanimously to support Mr. Johnson's recommended 'Changes,- Those { .mtheir: public hearing of MAtch 14, �.nutes are attached..,, The City Cb��sncxl, at t1 1983, discussed the Tigard Triangle at' length and as a result' of that he for policy, 11..4 to be incorporated , into the adopted -language P Y of the P discussion special areas of concern for NPO '4 section Comprehensive Plan cxt,e . the inter re.tati,on l me dments being � ro ose.d far.. .Po1a.c 1l 4 relate, to h , The a n P P Y P o a Council Policy. Staff recmnends that the. Planning• Commission review the attached documents, including the March 14, ,1983, 1 City Council minutes, Hand City Council on theinterpretation policy 11.4 at�o� of � make a recommendation to '� _, triter re t �I I I i I i it i i i ps. • li fi I 1 yy O�+� �aP I , . ul.,w aBu"wM..a,r..w ew.... ':l 1,u, r e _ 0 !:.l P 7M 1, tl` I)I'' +• I t .r oui e e mm • , 11P.O.BOX'370 PHONE(503) J'360 Notice 7-6180 '' BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 � C! �I 111 L,/ (t I r I Le«�sI Notice Advertising i.� G 1' ' '' 1 1 1 ' 1 r 1 . i.• rO Tearshet Notice Cfr� Q `� ;',.i 1 City of tigard Y� L` Duplicate Affidavit .., P.U. Box 233. 7 ' • I . Tigard, Oregon!'on 97223 i i AFFIDAVIT OF PUELIC• . . , PUBLIC HEA NG i QTI[CE The following will:be coinsidered b l�ho d PIauatlit Commission on ATF OF OREGON �,,'�} ST � Alt 23 1933,•at..7'30"P.NC. w e Tl f ., COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) " 6 ` i Higa. ay,,„Tigara;Oregon:, n orr"iatio ay be btained•I .,. s s � sly lPaclfio from the Directorinof�" gand Development at 12755 SW Ash Avenue, • �Ianni i �1�sari Pink ra , ��- Tigard,Oregou,•87223,or by callingp39417Z:0,. •.` , . being first duly sworn, depose and say th5'•1'COMPREEENSIVE'PLAN AME�IDMEN...l'' `,.;•, Dakota r, nwa r Con- Director or his principal clerks of the Tdoiminiuros,NPO#fi ,,, a newspaper of general circulation as dA,remand fi�oan City'council;to allow,for;;NPO-i#7-Input for a Comprehensive , fr . I- ,<h . �Y.e •. ium;Hi h be,nsi and 193.020;'.published at�. Tigard, CPlan.�A'tr►eRdment on�'�Medi zr�De to Mai g ty pn�l a Zone , . aforesaid county and state;that the , Change from,A-,s2 to'A-20 t> ulti•Family Residentiali),t on 6.38 acres of land ,• Tax Lot'100). -7-1---- �,�___ PUBLICNICE . located at 40485�V�'I�Tdrth D kola�l�ash.Co.�'81c ll�a�481 34DA : . I 1 :HEARING Nr � ,, �.�, - 5''3~�eiNfP��I S IaT'I EIC DII�EN ZONE CAGE printed copy of which is hereto annexe "i a of said newspaper for oneA�emand olnl City�'Conadil$os,iow for NPD► 7t t foIte r Compre ? si �: I '� entire issue � � � enslve; ,• Plan Amendtnentu fruan.Low�eti�i� �ta�l��editlrrn�eeisity Resident', a<i1#wZone' i , consecutive in the following issues Change from R^7 (Single Il;amlly`Residential)vto R-5 (single Family lk i:�iden„� ,,les idential Subdivision-fo , , I' ' '' ) Also approval of a12:lot si i . •Faintly,. tor,5,00$� Atigtust, Ii. 1983 �' %; ,., r sq fit. tats on 3 3S acl 1o1ed atr 'iry,��$'l rd•Stre�t and 4W113tNk Avenue (Wash,Co,T Map ISf DC Tax° t•2000) i 53 COMPRESCEN':,P�AM ME "' m. a ' ' ' ''' : ' 1 ' ' 11 ' '' _ t;� r.G u:: '""•+'��- .wH YM�E`n,rrn. ----, -i +i»"90.r+ " �.v.n W -.� _7 'ii.""request;to amend 114 2,1 .4 and`11'.42b regarding tha,f PO # ' �, ar in'thd find ! -Po11�t ''and-implementation°Strategies' ocupii�nt+,-' 1 ,eai�: ��¢Y,/.,`1 i{�g�s ,,,/ o /f���,tM [�qpp !f ��� y��1 ° � �i . , J„oil/41 i"i:q`t ZONE CM AI G.II:lyZC•'I 3 CN.' AYdS �1 •�^m �,M,•erg Chapelle/SoYecs n/Larson/C I,i fi a „ . „y.... . a. o7 , ' SaOar ,,Zimt�nmerman'P4 eCky rkt 0#7 . V ' ' A reg'noit;foe,a zone change from R 20 to' ifl�rthe.property:Ls'designated Low Subscribed and sworn be'•re a this_ " t I, 11' � 1- 'Da>k�ot���ted at Co,05%' 0,.10660,10600,10030,,10740!,10770 und„104(10 SW'North' '1 ash. Tax Map 1S1.,34.I)A,��Tax..L,oto„ 300,2400 012600�2.700, /, ) 9 2300,;'2900,3000,3100,and"32,00):" ,I fi~. . " ,, '' ' -"--` ' 6,$GMPREHENSIVE,�PLAN AMENDIVIENT" r. fe'HAtV+rE„Z , r, 1l.-83 Richard Sturgis' N O 41 '. . i : ' ' ' III::F:11:1' ', , ''l M Ct,mmission E y ) Ex , � Fel Feb.. 24 r gine Dens or�.. ,,a�ptehensivee i°ro 12 to"1i lib tar 1'''I feditu'n�`;Oensity°to ftnd .F; r tllti Eat�ii'i` r�i 1 , Igh, ty a Zone Chang ., � � �� y dential w AFFIDAVIT II 1orated,nt,13L 5 1-iall Blvd.'(Wash•Ccs,Tex 4ap„251.2,DA., ax ot,702). i 5.6.COMPREHE 4SIV,E PLAN . :AMEND AA .” A request h ,. 1 �• � � � cl ,, ,. , p !Intl:,to nomply' Pd • �, � � i<xi r to tt at+��" ehensi the Orin r an.anal a oof Econami" ' � With'� �S �ei�de",�1� considering yS�9� �i o- Fact " ies of the,CD tat ni' �oai,#�5 cousid - , � � Saclml''l�`�dd�itic►taioft�e�it�. td �a gy'�'�'"llr)�a �a�! Cop � Report I � are available torte**ew at,'We,T Public Library, 125 SW MaLn;Vi t, , I. Tigard,•Oregon. . ,' w. i I 5.7 PLANNED DE'VELOPMEtittSC1PD 2 79 i b Rrittany:Sq'uare..N ,#.7 , ...H, ...uw ..H<. .�.ya+rr W w .. ,.... w+ ys,...,.u.,:;.... ..,.:.... u.,. -».... ...lr;�•. as I.., .A c A ue�;b �+C,�l�ttal�c:;xAixl�e'vela m�n1 loan snyKfor a nhQtliffi+ z�` -�a : ., to allt'I'��'IV'e..(5)itaut�t�ar`i��etb�a on � ;. iapprov�d pit�tued deveYrdp��lent��oa�ler :Ili all lois Property`is located east of':135tth.Aveuticbetween! cbolls,Fer d'Vo ld V/ t(Wash, I� '$' x'Lot 300 and,„1,01:.Ma 3., 1 and: atnut Stree a,� �Co.Co.'>l�ax a 1;613 f s ,� '1133�C,.Tsxc'Lots 100,300,400,and 500). • ,,� v l ,I11' y ,i6;!,,. i �, 5.8 'COMPREHENSIVE P:iAN•.:' �W -PI.ANI4EID':f)EVELOPME��tT E '1 a CIt.RPD 1 -The I!�ieado}Tits- 1 O#7 • ,:r':-.} I i {i I �� i n�� e�,for'a ror�sl Ot` .' w• ° � ' i''',Q� �1ii�ilna `��d t�ener��1 flan Review��f•a 1. ed�ewe1o,+pmeat pP � A,re�u�st�by��a,�bud °tax r`�„ +�far ani~��Eeails t, G �Th ,((µ y h Co,I e ., :locat+edd o�het of SW Mack�t��ond�,WayWts .C►,. Tax a gt1 I • ��t1encomreuta are encoara�ec�Please sit�ni3er� ocume �° Director of Planning� ;Developmenta the above address'lln w, c f.,, e I I public hearing data, 1 � '� T161.36—P'tirblislt,'Au' t 1i '133 I I o: -Y,� ,.1 L,.I: ,bl,• .. ,. .,, ,ti.,a.xa..„•,�.,w ,...v.. ..v.,ry„« -..,.,>..>.r,.,..� ,y,�'1 .,. mh•1 . •M. , I h. Q -, (U N „K` c ,n O i..,,,,:„1 0 , r 0"Pt' , w O N"C7 ,: - 0. -.I `0 N C -, p'c . k O o , ,' ate: a cn« * o H D e« 0. 1-0 cls 0-c -n U1 — Fi N N. • x r'''.(4.s\:' „ ',,,,10:, (I)' -ci: 4 <A) r,r.-1(°,,„ g""..5. (4-r,0 ..,.., t.n LA.) A) ""., '' *T3 ' 0 . k " , (,-) '''''' '` a)-=' '''' 509, .---tz ,, o koN , `" "t'' .0 O CD 0 amu.�, U Nack. . R 0 V "" `. Com' % -.ii. 0 - a) ,�. ca O , �. m h g o o - H'3°g P w ;o D 7 cv F1A p'- 13:, 0 y:. co t e Imo.. p L 111 •+ co X ,,, ro CO 1 a. W C� —i 0 Z m ;;�� O /..Y = z ..A 5'k Y�V P) C.' . ,�y�, . _ 1 c 4V r�/ m CD ori co TYV= If`,,, o_«: --4-4 g. .�, . The foliowing''Will be cat ;idered oy fhe Tigard 'Pl nirtg Commission on1 m �) CI) Iltl Pd Tuesday,August 2,1983,at tlr `Ti.:.,t�dl School'District-Board 1 aom 13137 SW; > '* 6 ' Pacific HighWay; T'tgaY',dy Ori urk 'infforkxtatit a may be o' tatned frim the; o ., Planning Director at 12755 S.W.Ash,Tigard,,Or.,07223 or yby calling 63.0.4171. j a t74-1 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 5 CD I. 5,1 I COMPREHENSIVE PLANA 1E1,4D1‘4ENTit#A 13t8a,'Carl1353 Iohr;sori NPO Z A request to amend,policy1L4,2„111.4«2 a. and,.11.4«2 b. regarding the NPO #4 area in.the 11ndin gs Policies and Implementation Strategies — doct1ment: , l 5.2 SITE DF-.SIGN REVIEI,J,,SDR 26,704Sumnnerfield Shopping Center NI0 ' A.6req'uest by Realty Pinancial Services Co. for a modification to an o %`' approved planned development for the Summerfield Shopping Center. 5•m "Lochted:(Wash.CO,'�a Map 2S1 10D Tax tats 1902,1906 and part 110.) a 5,3 ZONE CHANGE ,.I 20 110-837 Boberg/ChapeilefSOrenson/Larson/' . Sol1ar's/. xmttierinaan/,Pateeky NPO#1 , A request or a zone change from R'20 to 1'10;the prop t la desi-gnat N • ' ed Low Density,Located: 10570, 10660, 11600, 1.0630, 10750,•10770,and roti , o 10800 S.W.,North'l akota. .-ash, Co. ax Map'151 341 A tai lots 2300: w p a 2400,2500,2600,2700,2800,2900,30001,3100 and 3200) 5.4 COiu?REI tENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 88 ' ZONE CI NGE 2C 11.83 i IC STURGIS*NPO#1 A request ftlr a Compre,;iensive1 Plan Atnetidmerlt from Medium bensity to high Tensity`;and a Zone Change fro A-12 to A-40 Multi-fatail residential.Located'133: 6 S .Hall BlVd (Wash,Co.Tax Map'25121 lot 702), '; 5.5 COMP S 'PLAN•Al ENDM NT"' %124$ ZONE+DANCE 9.83 PcM.Assoc./Portland Chain NPO#2 . ;A retinest for a Cornprehenhiae.Plan Change from lkid istriatto General • Com.irierciai'I and a zone Change from Industrial-Llght to C-3,Located i 1 Scholia P'ert7ii,R,'(cl hw Co,Tax Mali 1512' 1)tax!lot.1200) teii comm age I ent�.'Otr d�Please,apbrtilt writtedl:Gotratrierits to tire' : Planning 1Dit"cctor at the above address in dµaa a Iof the public hearing nate . :', "1 `5100 : ublisn,July 21,1653• I .� I I 1 " tf t I it t ,,„„h,,,,,,,„„,,„„,,,,,,t,, , I ` �. is �. ���, Iie,.. .,.../.11 ,,, , ciwoF RD T . '+ WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON I , I , • .. I A I June 22 1 QS 9 I .. I I 11 , Mr. Carl .Toh-,8on. I 6155 S.W. Bonita Road Lake Grove,e Oregon 74 4 tI I II I Dear Mr. Johnson: I � � I We ha-,7,- received an application from you for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to policy olicy 11.4.2 of the Comprehensive Plan: Unfortunately, . '- Luxe application you submitted is not complete. All of the application fords must be filled, out and a map andproof of ownership must accom; rani the application. Plea - . .t,'No '----. o '- .-1 , nformation to the Planning ,' Department by no. , on Friday July' 29, 1983. ,ilure to do so will delay consideration on your application a,• := . void the application. I • Sincerely, I I . * 61/ A tAit' ti Elie eth A. Newton I ' Associate Planner I IAN:Pl� I I I I I o 1 I ( b ' I i I I 1 1 I I I I I , , I I � I I 1 , I i I I I I i I II I I I r I I I I I ' I I I 4 , { I � { 1 is I 1 , I ( 14' gISS$w ASH P,04,BOX.2307 ` I A€ [) OntGoN':97823 PH:eao- ',71 a a 1 r, . , n i 1 p,. MINUTES OF NPO #4 MEETING - June 1, 198 Roll Call: NPO #4 Members> - Rick McMahon, Lou Christen, Carl Johnson, Iry Larson, Jean Danley, Geraldine Ball and Gordon Martin' guests -- Dennnis O'Neill representingFarmers Insurance Chet Larter Lois Larter � J‘;'innni.e Larson George Hansen representing OFA Motion was made and seconded that the minutes be approved. Motion passed unanimously. Under old business Rick McMahon said he understood that the "blo Parking" on 66th near Hampton Oaks is to be handled by the council at the next meeting. ,A.tlanticfPa.�o�,fic _Street L.I.D. #35 was Under new business the matter of the 68th brought u . Jeremy d an informal meeting g p exny stated... that on ::June 20 the Council would hu_.. and the Engineers report and feasibility study would go to Council on the 27th of June. • It was `stated that the Council would continue the Pttblic Hearing on. June 13 as one property owner had just heard of the L IODO a few hours before the previous Council meeting. After a very lengthy discussion a motion was made by Carl Johnson, seconded by Jean Danley and unanimously passed that under 11:4.2 that we change "a" and. "b" as follows: . a. This condition shall not apply to Parcels having direct access to Pacific Highway or the Interstate 5 Freevitay access ramps. b. Thiscondition will apply only to those areas changed from Industrial Park to General Commercial other business Mr. Dennis O'Neill of Norri,E, Beggs & Simpson and representing Under Farmers Insurance approached the NPCP grcup in regard to expanding the code to allow .tel use underP. The NPO #4 stated they had no objection to' a Hotel on Farmers insurance property. After a lengthy discussion a motion, .,was made, seconded and unanimously passed that • the Development Code include the alwance 'of Motor Inn. or al. Motel, use as a conditional. use in CP zone. In regard to Iry Larsen's questions 4 i n regard toheighth buildings, ystated hex Nth of bui�din s Jeremy that was already handled under conditional use. The question o gres sing in regards to the :. wa.S asked how the feasibility � .; ty study was pr. . Interchange extension. Jeremy stated that large property owners have received their agreement and if they sign, the agreement the City will enter into a feasibility study will enter into an egreemen go fattier if thosep `ty owners ` and.: the Council t to pro ei agree en the feasibility' study. Mention was made of an article, in, the. Tigard Times about a group studying the economic development' of Main Streetand the !triangle' and in response to an inquiry as to whether the NPC would be kept informed; .Jeremy stated he did, not know what plgocese was being followed. There being no further business the tate-Ung adjourned. erddia "fiIt. .w" Secret A,ttest v < I I I } r T I GAR D CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 14, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors Tom Brian,, John Cook, Kenneth Scheckla, Ima Scott (leaving at 11:05 P.M.); • ;, Jeremy Coursolle, Associate Planner; City Staff Doris Hartig, Finance Director/City Recorder; Bob Jean, City 'Administrator; Bill> Monahan, Director of Planning and Development; Liz Newton, Associate Planner; Ed Sullivan, Legal Counsel. 2. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA (a) No one appeared to speak.: �,. 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP (a) Public Hearing Reopened by Mayor �; . (b) Associate Planner Coursolle noted letters in Council's packet dealing with the same area (west of Hwy. 217 and South of 99W property). , properties; at SW -5 Other areas of con+:crit are 66th Avehue'' and 1 .;, rr.eew.�a and deal wi4h change from CP to Comrttercial designation. All 4, 3� g g . speakgeneral commercial type use. _! letters to nt7rt en 3.1 NPC) #4 �x. (a) Public Testimony Lava.11e Allen, 7540 SW llermosa Way, NPO #4, recommended properties . . o west of SW 70th to Hwy. 217 be zoned generalcommercial. o Gordon Martit , 12265 SW 72nd Avenue .referred to a letter gated •:. February 28, 1983 that contains all the issues of concern to the PO. lie urged higher zone designation so propertyr talar become more 4 therebyit will be ornicall: feasible ers • "'b: valuable and. ecorx ; . for homeo�'t to relocate As well as allow for property to develop. A, t � o councilor Scheckla questioned long-range, plans, for Phil Lewis Staff responded that during the planning period', the City was School. " assured the school will stay ` o Fury Reid, 12700 SW 72n.d, Tigard, NPO #4 member, andbusiness owner }, sporeto the conversion idea for hotteo metra and felt'. light industrial lacks the flexbility as general torniercial tone, as well. as :t r provide for transition period and is extremely difficult againstoestirt. � d loi density residential areas. Re 'mated the main ,'issue is residential owners being able to econoriica.11yt [ sell'; their homes and` dot pe�te kith vacant industrial Land. lie, urged general aom teircial .' oni ig, n this, area�r. I. i yl N I , • , IoI Geraldine ineL. Ballrepresenting herself andI b B 11515 SW 91st Tigard, recommended general commercial zoning for Larson property.' She questioned if her property designatd as wetlands or ' I floodplain and, by whose authority is it so designated. She also objected to incorrect, maps used by the Boundary Review Commission #1910 annexation. She submitted)' maps' for records and an album, II noting P . I the environmental impact' statement 're report.P _. I I II I •;;; .tI ' o Planning Director requestedI time for staff Ito review her testimony` I` , I and respond to her questions later 'in the evenai.ng. Council, concurred. I I v Virginia Vir inI lia Catn lbell 12120 SW 7 2nd r N PO #4, agreed with Martin an , Re di'stestimony and requested if any transition zone is provided L I that they not be included in that zone. `, II o Fred Anderson, Attorney representing Dietzman property, ' stated he is • in accord with NPO #4 recommendation. o David Campbell, 12120 SW 72nd, reported he was lin favor of commercial designation and endorsed his wife's comments. He expressed concern ,- I for the, qualityof life for remaining residential property owners. • `t He, suggested a buffer zone around property be removed..;' o 1.(:ou Christen, 17895 SW Shasta Trail, Tualatin, spoke to the transportation' plan and in his opinion didn't think, the secondary' • road d developed. roadI is too close to the Phil, Lewis r a will ever a The rise School. He addressed the issue of trying to (sell his property with 'the incorrect' floodplain, designationb He reported he has souse` • sensitive. land areas but felt there gas, lack of staff support. Staff .�R I , responded thathis property vas i.rct). rectly designated and the map has been corrected. Council suggested' the corrected information be posted and M . Christen receive letterlfrom ataff giving designation. , Christian continued testimony stating. general •. Ch �.an �� he, was in favor o f g I • commercial zoning.' 0 Donald Ufa s t' d� I • ltine� �:�pr� end ,tng ��. �rw11 Hanker, 12755 :SW Buena Vista I � Dr. and repre sen ng r, Vinke,, stated he was in accord with. • coiiuttercial designation. Re noted industrial, land in this area xs' too expensive for developutent arid supported the staff's proposal.) Yi ; I o Haddon. 1.35 5S.W. Village Glen Drive representing g Invest-,A—Venture, testified xn favor o t. the coarr:ercial zone ` He ,noted his proposed recreet+ designation. ton .ce��terl anc'r requestedII . � .' w I � w „ III I, be allowed. He alas commented), industrial designation is not suitable for this are , as well as the impact; of that kindof development ons` schools and tratt.sp'ortat ion problems. I I , it Councilor Scott questioned Haddon regarding type of rec reat.ion. center. IIMay.:.:or BtIshoP respondedthe issuewhether thelackd + to zon ed , I industrial park or .conttsercial I I I I I I I I I II I , I IIr I I is I I I I' 1 I I • I I I I I I I I I fI^ r y}�� �,�••i���.. 4w� yy ' JC"�Vf'r, aGr Ur O ,may Il}}+w M/NUTBS MAttC11 14, r >a,. • • •.,ti o J i I � I i i I i • Counci 16r Scott referred her ues t ilon to Attorney ,Sullivan. Attorney Sullivan responded the issue is toi decide whether ts - industrial or commercial. The i ;appropriate zone this: Co property basic land use issue will be, decided if it ` is a permitted outright land use. Only item for consideration at a later date would be Site Design kevies.i. ..•P•. . Io David Sant, JaSant Corp,, representing ent ing client aent ininve st-A-Ven ture , slupported the commercial, designation ,for the triangle area. He noted most industrial areas ` want to avoid residential areas due to , . Potential' conflict over industrial uses'. The ,configuration of the property dues, not lend itself to large 'industrial development of the 11, triangle area. In his opinion, the highest) potential' usefor the land is commercial development. • f H 0 a P #4 '• Ted45thAvenue N.E. n favor Salem spoke � o Williams',W�.l l lams 43S 2 y t P proposal and concurs with the plan and feels it is in the best interest of Tigard. s , 303, 10505S.W. Barbur Blvd. , Portland, displayed o ,3g 8�...I� Suite p, aerial pnua`o of area attd spoke to futurel, development, He encouraged l .! Council to review the City inventory of industrial park land and general commercial areas. He suggested the area be a lof uses; • ;E some industrial park land some comi..tercial uses. He urged, development f 'the he. trans ortat ion'. plan' and the providittg !of City services. p p o John Gibbon, Counsel for 'Robert Randall, owner of property adjoining Finke Ispoke in favor of Commercial designation. He feels at Mixture ` „n ••� of office/c�arehouse space taould be suitable for ;their area. Re, urged .. aoad t a s,..o.rtatiotil and pedestrian stss tem be ,developed for the especially around , Phil' Lewis' School. He Icontinued on 'and recon mended all. their Iproperty be Zoned commercial as some 'of it is' ,r‘owl in ';a split zone. o Terry alien , 11682 8.1,+1. 'booze kd wilaonvil,le, reps°esentittg Sam. Sofas, urged en ral; cormmerci.al designation, not i t cktstrial. zoning,. o Hans. Crurnbaum, j)roperty' owner in triangle area endorsed commercial deve1apment. b Corl,iss, resident d, t arid operator rator o f tandtttark Ford, supported • area. � on of entire_ commercial des . Nati LI o Sean battle .' 7060 S:W. 8e 'elattd,r supported commercial designation to I iI her 'property+ City I � I ,fit a l s dd tar rs 4 � ,returned,, to the end res ,ane � ��.ty staff �neeta�ng a � letter. Staff noted qtr. ' l.arsonits property gas not omittedl in the annexation. city 19'7/ mI does notxnd�cate her praperry, zs in the floodplain, ha a er , i,t its possible, a. pc'rtion of land could be in the '11 etl.er>ds i.e.,. haV]tictl high grater table. Staffreporter' tte daundary ,8.eviev CoratirYsdxocstn s were,. ,inco rectr hoeorw the boundary k++_ iA CO H.'1WW�T S "• Cf1 14 19.133 }}� • t . i , I 1 i • 1 • I I I If I , i I . • descri tionthebinding d iso n documentsand � m s Ln . maps ae for llu t ate r s r �v • • ' P E � � x e , purposes only. The legal ;metes and bounds description submitted was , correct. :• � f I t. Planning, Director further respocaded to the' rest of tars. 'I 1 1 N� �� • I it I Ball's' questions. �� Council and staff,' discussed the'', designation of 1 wetlandf and use of the property,when time for development' arrives. RECESSED C A"1' 9.4 P.M. 5 P. RECONVENED AT 10:06 P.M. I 0 Mayor Bishop questioned if Council wanted to meet again this week to ` complete the work on the Comprehensive Plan Map. He noted the Zone ' Change Annexations have to be decided' by March ,18, 1983. Consensus • ..' vas ' tomeet Wednesday, March 16, 1983, 7:30 P.M. at Fowler Junior Bigh School. f .' o Counc i f or Cook; sugges ted the area o f Frank,i.ri east o f: 72nd should: be' j f g � ` g� egal Counsel, assist i withed to commerial, ro�.essxr;nal he su ested T.� with the language in, dealing with existing residentialproperties, conversation. and buffering. I o Cou4� ilor Arian expressed' concern for conversion front light industrial to cottmiercia1 professional; the request, for C-5 for , property on 1-5 Freeway and agrees with general com mercial } •` W des'ignation�. Councilor Scheckla� agreed t4ith Brian's' comments ,',:. !„ endorsing general Commercial. He noted roads and; transportation is an item of great concern. . f 0 Mayo, r Bishopexpressed his ec ^erregarding the Proposedosed extension from SW 78th/99W to1ntereh,ange a 1-5 Freeway i Co Haines. He,r+. reef) 'ended this be in place before any developm.:rt takes place (or, a. • legal agreement to, complete collector road). He also stated ,he would like to consider the possible. use of some residential medetza (density'' • • in that 'area and enrcoura a above the, first floor commercial _' ,• development, to residential uses. lie a greed wIr�th other '�Co�ncil '-• utetnbers` with strict interpretation of, development of collector streets;: , a Council and City Attorney discussed at length specific language to' implement coun0.11 s recr�mmendation Councx1 cl.ar f .ed areas on the , map, (exhibit tol these tainutes) the noted changes` in :zon'ing. ' Legal counsel re nest, he be all edr . �.. ,, �. � the meetingto draft, mot74Crt1, 1 . Cou � ported to leave ' to wtork out details with interestedpropertyof--hers and bring back , i ji,,, for' Council consideration. w. r council concurred. councilor Scott 1,left at 1l ' ' µ • i I� I ' 1• I li , f , Ir � I , I 'I I • 4 w I iI I I • a l 1 I , f • ' `, �W a"" _ ` moi �A i;{4F4 Li. � . k�� -. ��yy�}' A w ♦ r 4,.. i I ;y. o 'Vittz Ramsdell 11635 Terrace Trails,. addressed Bechtold property i density and traffic ,issues. o Ralph Flot..ers 11700 Gaarde, spoke to Bechtold Annexation and I I of low densityissue. expr._sses support 1 .. � O Discussion bY Co ur cxl regarding testimony followed. Conci O r • Bchecklafavored low density for Bechtold property on Walnut Avenue.'7 Council suggested medium high permit use or C.P. zone. on Beef-Bend ' property. Associate (Planner Newton'; pointed out and marked areas on , map and made a part of thi.s ;record, marked Exhibit "A". • made as 'Ichanges as discussedbe ' (b) Motion by= Councilor Cook the 4 � outlined on the map with respect to NPO Councilor Brian seconded I t. the motion. I ; o Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 3.3 NPO #4 (a) Attorney Sullivan, returned to the meeting and reviewed the proposed statementproperty, � Council ' • ' that represents a consensus of� owners. discussed the specifics, and intent. of ` the motion as well as the .. 'impact on proposed development. ;b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian, that the Plan Map designations for 4P0 #4 recommended to Council by the Planning I' Commission be approved ' pp and, in addition' the 3 other changes shown on the map, tzar toed '.as Exhibit "A,�a..� ' be adopted by Council. I . ' The following additional policies are also adopted for the development in IPU #4 specified below. e t In the Tigard Triangle (i.e. that az.aa bounded by Pacific, I Highway, Highway , l7, and the Interes t --P' eeway), in those 1 parcels designated "CP", High Density ices idential 13evelopment, (i.e. a►0 to 40 utrtits per acre) sha. P. use e allowed lowed outright in co� un etion with commercial roM �nauses. 2. In the Tiga,rd Triangle descrabed above, thoseparcels designated for any (3) Cozsmerclial development shall not develop for such use, if. not already so developed:, unless a •, major' collector, connecting the area on. Pacific Highway at. ppportion of Haines ., a ro��.triaitel. � 78th� Avenue and theesterl toad Interchange at Interstate E''ree ay (at I '"pp y rox:meteh69th atb rtmouth be''1 cot lLtueted, be guaranteed within one year for l totstrue tion by a. public A'„a,ei cy, or be approved dor 1, to'ostruction as ',a part` of, a local ituprovemtnt district after' the. remonstrance. and 'review period have e pired. This• ,}.. 'coed tii nshell not apply toy parcels having direct +toes to, 1 Pacific 1tighway, or the' ltiterstate 5 freeway access ramps unless tha �Iporiion proposed for,�� de etopm.etit is; greater than t ' t f—t4aline of P U. a Hi hawa + r 1�Ct� trots ��the rah ,.� I ltterstate 5 Trite Change ramps. i I I i P'A+ g 6 OW4C tNt Tl S' h, 14, 108316 44; 14 001, J . i a i I I I i "Until new commercial development is permitted .1..n the triangle under 1 ' p �' this condition, e=ti,, only new development that may occur on any parcel inthe triangle is a single family residential use." d he `gas uncomfortable without suggestions Brain state from the ' property owners as to how to get the job done. t Motion approved by 3-1 majority vote of Council present, Councilor Brian voting NAY II `�� NE MANGE ANNEATION w ZCA 3-92 2 (Durhatil. Island) INFO #5�#b 5-82 (Bechtold Annexation)ion) NPO #3 1 ZCA 1Be,ch to 1 An ) I u � ' II ' ZCA 7=-8? (North DaKota, Annexation) NPO #2/#7 . ZCA 17-82 (Randall) NPO #4 I , ,I. IZCA $2- 16 (Cooper) NPO #4 II 1 NPO' -, ZCA 11-82 (BennyLarson) `#3 I� 1 II searing a Public Opened u til march r By consensus, of Council Mayor continued public •hearxng � n 7:30 P.M. High School. I 17, 1983, ' t�. Fowler Junior 'Hi h Sc 5. RADI 'Y FL'OODPLAIN POLICY I , Phanning Director requested this item be ‘".ontinued to give Council changeI for further review, Council concurred. 1 . 6APPROVE EXPENDZlURES AND IESMEN 5, � 1.24'34.4e g I I I II, o ok ' seconded byCounciloi: Scheckla to approve. .�otlori Cou.nc�.l r Ca I I I Y o.� dbyunanimous vote of �Cau�c�,l. resQrnc. I Ar �ue n Pp �P UE I _ . 7. ACCEPT RIGH. OE �'A�' REGARDING 72ND AVENUE' LID 1 ' II I I I iI, ' I (a) Motion by Councilor Cook,I seconded by Councilor Scheckla to aptl. I q l it I �I � unc Approve by unanimous vote_e o f Co i1 present.�p ' 1 , 8. ACCEPTSTREET DEDICATION - Forrest Co ul l I r I I or Scheckla to accept.(a) bio tion 'b ;Counc x for Cook ' s econdeci byCounc�.k $? ,y � owed- byunanimous vote of Cour►cL.l resent.) A rT�' I p � I 1 CICS AS' ' FCLLCW.S. 9, AFPkO�'g ()LCC ,APPL�I~CATI , Gaf Vieat_y 206/207 2id d F1ata- Tigard, OR Class A. li is en se, 0 Dig B ,Thirftttay, 14363 'Std, Pat fic fzyNett License (Canterbury square) o 'Bdergmainn o a gestaurant, I.IZ,7i,a5 Slit' Pacific ry., (HclCenzie & PaOific twy.) Gl acs f c RMB', (Pfafft:e &, Pacific ) 1 I I o 'r,ia d So�rl ; 115�i� S P � y' g r � �� ,I (a) N tioti, by Conncilnr Colok, Iaeco'nded, by Councilor Scheer)-a to a;Ppr+gve Approved by unetiertou.s vote of 'Courtcirl., titeaent. , P .• �,M.YI t.•1. �lCb' 1 C�� C1'.i � .tl'PCSr, l��r� l4 1081, ! w V1 r 9. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN URBANIZATION CPA 13-$3 r, (a) PUBLIC HEARING OPENED o Director of Planning ing and Development Monahan stateded the Planning ng 9° Commission on January 20, 1983 had recommended adoption of the Urbanization element. o Associate Planner Coursolle gave an overview of the Urbanization element. Discussion followed regarding areas of interest and the Urban Planning Area Agreement with Washington County. o Consensus of ' the City Council is to amend Urban Planning Area r Agreement ,�. to� be able to annex:.:.in areas .of<interes�. .; g (b.) PUBLIC TESTIMONY I o Geraldine Ball, 11515 S.W. 91st, representing DJB Inc. and herself, read a letter into the record, regarding annexation and de-annexation of her property. , o Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SEW, Walnut, representing NPO '#I 3 expressed concern for Item number 11 tegarding annexations and 10.1.1 b regarding the non remonstrance. rtrement. o Mayor Bishop noted that Vitz Ramsdall, (representing NPO 3, had ,., spoken at the January 26, 1083 meet ng regarding this issue. t . ro Associate Planner ,Coursol.l.e commented that re ardi , , i , n Item umber 11 that there would be instances where you could not avoid that' problem. O CityAdma i t a torc ommented that the State of Oregon has one of } the most restrictive annexations laws in the United States.' He suggested I that they not give up any authority granted under the state law. ` o Mayor 'Eishop suggested not including item # 11. o Mrs. 'Ball, requested staff to respond nd to whether she was or was not in the City; City Administrator stated to the best of his knowledge Mrs.' Ball s property isthe City. The `staff will review and to� respondher and the Council, �: ,� �, Co) ,� I't,T$L`IG UTA:EING CLOSED (d) city, .Administrator' discussed' rewording of 10.1.1. C Bob 'questioned ,�f it wasoffer H e ah $leds+be ties t zone: } public for city :staff to gg ublic hear ng has been closed; pudic changes of� wording after the Hearing was' reopened. a I. (x) City .Admxn;istrator, proposed wording changes to items 10.1.1*; 1O 1.2 a) and 10.3.1. Discussion followed, i y (g) � .Bob� ledsoei wasc.oncerrited wx. h:� the procedure.) that° changes s'b+anld; have 'been res, nted through the a' { nni.' � � � �� c�omm����tin. ti A4 U GGUN 1� M1 �TES rt'Bit1l'Atty 7j. 183 9, u . f' (h) Further discussion on wording changes for policies.' Including deleting wording in 10.1.3 and; replacing with, 11 The City shall consider annextion requests outside theTigard Urban Planning Area ' and within the Urban Growth Boundary consistent with policies 10.1.1 and 10.1.2 and agreement between the City and the County." (i) Bob Bledsoe commented that 10.3.1 as adopted by the Planning Commission would prevent irregular urban growth boundaries. He did not feel the changes proposed T;re different from what they had proposed. (j) PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED (k) ORDINANCE No. 83-07 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE URBANIZATION ELEMENT OF THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. o Councilor Brian questioned policy 10.1.1 b, asking for a clarification from staff. Discussion followed. Leal Council suggested wording changes. o Councilor Brian moved and Councilor Scott seconded to approve policy 10.1.1. a. as amended to read as follows: 1°PRIOR TO THE ANNEXATION OF LAND TO THE CITY OF TIGARD a. EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CITY' SHALT. REVIEW SERVICES AS TO ADEQUATE CAPACITY, OR SUCH SERVICES TO BE; MADE AVAILABLE, TO SERVE THE PARCEL IF DEVELOPED TO THE MOST INTENSE USE ALLOWED*, AND WILL NOT SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE LEv.!EL OF SERVICES AVAILABLE TO "DEVELOPED .AND UNDEVELOPED LAND WI7HINI THE CITY OF f TIGARD. THE SERVICES ARE:" � I Hotiort approved 'unP.rtxmous vote. PP by of Council present. ' o CouncilOr Brian moved and Councilor Cook seitonded to approve policy 10.1.1 b. as amended to 'read, as f0110ws: "IF REQUIRED BY AN ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM ORDINANCE, THE APPLICANT SHALL SIGN AND RECORD WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY A NONREMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT ;REGARDING THE FOLLOWING„ 1., THE FORMATION OF A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (L.I.D.) FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING SERVICES ,THAT COULDBE PROVIDED THROUGH SUCH A DISTRICT." THE. EXTENSION OR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ,FOLLOWING: a) WATER b) SEWER,, e) DRAINAGE; AND 1 d) STREETS; '' h AGE � — COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUAR `, 158 II 2. THE FORMATION OF A SPECIAL DISTRICT FOR ANY OF THE ABOVE SERVICES OR THE INCLUSION OF THE PROPERTY INTO A SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT FOR ANY OF THE ABOVE SERVICES." Motion approved byunanimous vote of Council present. o Councilor Erian moved and Councilor Cook seconded to approve policy 10,1.1 c. ' as amended to read as follows: "THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE '` URBAN SERVICES TO AREAS WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA OR WITH 4 THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY UPON AANNEY,ATION." Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. o Councilor Cook mo-ved and Councilor Brian seconded to approved policy 10.1.2 & a. as amended. • Ition carried unanimously Cc :I`•1and Councilor Cook seconded to approved policy ' �0.3.1as amended 'to read as follows: "APPROVAL OF PROPOSED LAND ANNEXATIONS BY. THE CITY SHALL BE BASED SON FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO , }, THE FOLLOWING: ' { • ,� �t tr� "ISLAND" ,�; THE ANNEXATION ' IELIMINATES AN :EXISTING ; POCT�ET OR ;....ISLAND OF ;, a. A N XATION EL UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY; OR; I , I �. t b. THE ANNEXATION WILL NOT CREATE AN' IRREGULAR BOUNDARY THAT MAKES • 1 IT DIFFICULT FOR THE POLICE IIJ AN EMERGENCY SITUATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE PARCELWITHINCITY; � • . IS OR OUTSIDE THE' C2T , , l cDEPARTMENTUPON THEiI THECOMMENTEDANNEXATION; ' C. POLICE HAS- a . THE LAND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA AND Its • CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY BOUNDARY.• r e. TH E NN A E' XATIONAN BE C ��. CO C I�MOD�i ET3' a T BY THE SERVICES LISTED IN Motion approved bu nint �r� osu vote of CouncilP resen .� o Council Brian moved and Councilor Cook seconded ,to approve Ordinance • No. 83-07 as gattended. , I .. E Motion • , _ approved by unannoiis vote of Council present.,; , '" lb. _OPEN AGENDA• Cons�dera�ztn 'of I N on A�e d a Items �dent���ed to the Chaire under item 1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged to contact. the'! City Administrator prior to the nieetirig a i LETTER FROM. SENATOR d'IM SIMMONS - Regarding vacancies on boards. , , , a. Councilor Brian siggeted sending ,the letter 'td the Tigard 'Tines PAGE 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES -' FEBRUARY 3 r T x I I I I:. i,l. '",:['..w,1, }l1 h � Mr'. I '1 ,l , ... , r q }e i'';' prs tie tice ort '' . QLICY OF TITLE 8 SURAN r, - ,t. il `w ' SCHEDULE 'i i:._ Azz)otx, Premium E 'e,rwe Date y . . ., , ,,,, r, $ 22,500.00- $ 135.0U--- April 30, 1979, 3:04 PM . 1 I a ! r • : I 1 SLTI1aT u._ r t, 'I ---CARLH. JOHN$O rid FREDERICKE; N. JOHNSON--- • +,ia II •' b� 1 The tide to the fee estate oz interest in`the larld described heior%. is at t:`i: date liet.eof ),.restekt iHt; i .., ---CARL H. JOH•INSON and FREDERICKE N. JOHNSON, an estate to fee simple, as -- r tenants by the entirety-,,i.. 1 a 4 f. 2. The. land referred to in this pulley. is described as fo!lzuNws: ''; 't --Lots 18 19, 20,i,.., 2I, 22 23 24 and 25 in Block'1, WEST PORTLAND( HEIGHTS, in the E, County of Washington and�State of Oregon I ::7J, ,,.,., : '�, ' W A S H I N GI TI O N C O U N T YR G 0 N r. 3901-8a. REAL PROPERTY; TAflS ACCOUNT: 25943 1513600 01500 OIbT ` SON OR FIEFOF " ,.,: PULL t.. ONE tH.I'1.0 TWIT THIRDS wA k ''NOV 2'51981 45$ 96 „ 1543,06 309.130 PT'LO PORT AX-CL)0 E023`'8 2 M TFx I I LL! „s a� 3 �2 . I - , .II � I � 1 1 • 4� A5SE55ECYALUFS ) I 'o L AND 2300 ,1 I , � 8 �,1 � 8. i 1 >..* ASSESSED 23300 r k ,WEoT#� L rT���0�� A�7 V 1 1, I I UYl � I 1 tQUIATLY 9 INTER( ST NUT I �CLUEta ONDEi,INGUET YES " ' , w S Nit ti ,TAXCCLECTtH PO 356PTAMM R I yy � , . ,..l. 1 1 r ' i , . w ZONE -' �U� 1rlU�xVSON, CARL 1 1 6155 �5s dONT' A ROAD I , 1 I ' LAKE A OkO�t� ti,t1 9 44 • ; �W LL �1., �,Y.�� .' �yat1' t ,.;a�.�wt�l►7r�rik{� 4�rl. `� ��fl" '�Or �' 4,,..,..„t,,4,,,.1 M'��.Y�Ww. �,y..� wM'�'�A"r�pi 1�. �,yt� �4 �!� w J ,� CARL, I ZgNE' a R1J4 .NtiNi 014, ARL, H AND ': T l�l 1 1 ; *' * * * ** * C* *#**** ', 'REl , C E N P I DEPT. to I ,11/22/t 1 i1,1,S SW t0N h ROA yQ;jf+ y14 ' y{,.��y 23-02 as ,��/y:i y81 LA G1ti o k A!M 1Wf� -: f+!{-R��Mr: �LS n(�+91�V W'� f I I .. I 1 tY."4 t'. ' ' x'!tna....,,'��,,:.�, w'urM. -7;', ; wK„,.',+ ; t I�"�.o�.rv�iwilt. +-a r. -,w,,+w�we n ,'.u4rL,� r ,', ,wr r . "M � � Mss +r4xw..,. �. . w,, ,, rz _, ,.i. . ",i',....:,1.&!.,'.'&',1;,',:',.',,,,.',.<-44" r "I' ', y Ai4 ' . e „ . A y + m, <+iv� ds .47 rt+y R v , I i • ( yV*+r rl ,I ,,. AMO r 4 • "Y..` IW Y�IIK ' ;vi• ,t, 4 1...,'' .''. '''' j,M'' n,. I '°` •r•�. A . , rrI 71i i l ..I.,. •4%..1 J •'. •YI o..r'{.r,..r, „—•• .. . - + � wP.:,: �...; I ,� {� �S,,,r :+ .I.,,, � � 1_�'�`r ( 4 r"."4'"+ �i I.r 1 � " w . 111 1 C._...L L..t..� l ...._.�' _.,« .� �� >I r � • I 1 F---1-7-11 ,_�.....';;-.` , •T-..-,---1 r 1'- I 1:11 nf.:: ( : J �� i I (p IL... I. •y ' ..r 1 } i.---- }.r8 M`I^_ .W...I' r--- ... 1+`1' 1 I �,•.- t L. V«. -, t Lii_ »i � ,t_. ...� a•" L;i„. _...1 8 1 1. rpH '♦ ��i 1 1 �."r' ^I:��,I �ra a}a��•« rrr+ 1 I I^1� t o µ„ •« r ,......„,rl ( L�;j 1"_ � fI i.�. i....1 ..., ®.��"" 1.�:[ f M".• tlr. _ fie` .—1-3-1"- .w - ,t { , '•t,.r7-”" .. 1 i` C. I•.-�"...t.�L.�n,..i a....J 1 a r.' , r. a. V , t }---�', 1 + :. ( 1 /-1-----1 1 1,b , Le•L �.'�'_• M 1'r ,.ri,:r !'I'r 1 I1 I''a , " J tiT ,�. ' li �t � ff r'� ►..� .�' v '"r!.1 ��+� /'', a" ^i' a .a�.. • c,7 _ ,r✓. l V � A 1, I.. .. ,,i » , — .�'1",.,.'t' ""'t-. '1•` ioF" 1 1� / 1 a r tid� ,,, ,.1.. 1„w4�.r� �• L—...�_”'vJ," 1e.. .. 1" a..A ,... t y r � ., 1 ,L'. .L n•_,.�'���.A� .1«� F', ..ft,..4„,. i _vire, ,, ,,., ,..,.,, , .. .......... „.,i . .., v.,,, L . ....-_' 1 .� rW"�.{ t wL ,., :.. 1 ���1 � w•• t• t t ,�� \ i n•� ,, : .., . ' „a,. ...... - _:i:. .. ,.,. .,, i. - M;�z./Aw. ,,. , ti. ..•W..,w. _ oa ,tdsxus 7m 4I 1 1 I' .. 6155 S. W. Bonita,LakRd. . : e Grovr Or . 97034 June'27 ,,, '8 er �``� f(,, ,, Mr, William A. Monahan II Director ofPlanning & Development ��, City Of Tigard, t�rege: . 6 k,j9$, l RE: Comprehensiv:w Plan Changes 11.4.2 tD `� i p' Submitted pu'�isuarit to Council request to a` . applicants i. heard Na.' 9, 1983. Fee Waived». ey�+r is�V,E +,fit ryY� . I Deal, P4�. )1+anahana On June lj 1983, P '. 4 heard, �discxssed and voted forthe PPO' following proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan Findings & , Pol .c• es. (See NPO #1t minutes for the June 1 meeting to get the E: exact wore il'ig.) ;; To resolve the controversy over O 4. policy. 11. . and to t reflect original intent: 2' byinserting the fo110 ��,� amend �.1;e,�,« :ir, � g .ng between the 1 words IIDEVELOPMENTo and '11SHAILI1 in the second line: ,;. which lie westerly of SW 72nd Ave., and vere , previously designated Industrial, Park..... ' (2) amend_l1.�.2 a, by crossing ng out that part follow '' ing the words I' 'aEEWAV AOCESS"SRA PSS e (3) Eliminate 11..4.2 b entirely t Please add this to the P1°-11fling Commission . gt nda f°1''' June 9. YoursVery' ' r a: vs l4 Carl ohnso ,fa A i N w ..r n ,, «. 1 ;! crrvoFTiARD c ' WASHINGTON COUNTY,C 'C,MI GENE AL PPLICATION; FORMiL , ,CASE No.I-) tr),,,,o. ,,..., , ,.../ CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash,' PO Box 23397ui\I ECE�IPT No. : Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)639-4171 I9bi AH TIG OF 1. GENERAL INFORMATION i�i � � �, ` CITY FOR STAFF USE 4NLY. o f 6 th & Atlanta'LANNING DT Associated Cases: ' 9 PROPERTY ADDRESS S.W. corner Lots Ea7818192fl2122232)4and25' iii, Blockl , 1 l in "G e At1n o ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION � ,� � , x �, IV INTERNAL PROCESSING: l SITE, SIZE app.r ox. 32,000 sq.fare feet. 1 � Accepted far Pre-App. �'.: a *, Car H. Johnson 1 PROPERTY OWNEit/DEED HOLDER B . 1 __ , 1 . ADDRESS 15�' .�. Bonita Roads Lake, Gz ove 9 703 PHONE 6 39-1011 � '� ' - t Pre-App CITY Lake Grove, Ore. 970314 ZIP 9703 � Date & Time:CarJohnson , , > ADDRESS (above) PHONE Accepted for. Decision: 1 CITY ZIP _ *Where the owner and the applicant are different people , the By'. applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee In. :. a' Hearin k Date. i possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with 4tritten" authorization. The written Hearing Reset To: authorization must be submitted with this ,application. RLETTERIZAT1 •s on; filed' & mailed OF AUTHOR [....:1 REQUIRED TOI IS ATTACHED ,......._____OES NO. 3. '17. THIS "APPLICATION INVOLVES TH FOLLOWING: A'P. .,, PEE 1 FLD PAIL) Accept`.ted for Appeal: Comprehensive Plan. Amendment front Text Chang 1-3:-..."'—'—' 1 quasi-judicial' A legislative ' X bate of i1e.aringng: Zone Change from to quasi-judicial legislative ktiSGRI. N ...... PlannedUnit DevelopmentC . la Desi natio conceP t,Flan de tai led 'plan '1 ` -.-'-•Subdivision. ' WW'�O O. lajOr1 `Pat t,ition Minor Partlt Zox Z�o ,i.n ZstrZct ,, i), Design Review -" .... Conditional Use Zoning Map No. Va� ance 'd to Zonitig Ordinance, , 1 1. (Title l ) ' Quartet Section No. ' Variance' to Subdivision x, tan. rd': �. (Title ' ....�. Se'�S Z t�.'itel7)T�anc�'Permit ' i STAFF NOTE48., Floodp., , � „a7Y.n5 , Drainaget.tay Steep Slopes ��he�> Mart & Poi iise �, 1 , TUTAL w l , a I { n , .. I I ., i D , , ,,,,, i , 1 GENERALAPPLICATION FORMA' :WAGE. 2 _ ,, ,,;ASF N . a CITk OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 t ' Tigard Oregon 97223 - (503)639--i- 171 CITY OF TIGAR SUPPLEMENTAL INFE RI,IATIt� N ATO .BE PRQVIDEI} B?L-h 'R k1 ? 'd AOR'STAFF USE OaiLY" NoEl.^e of Response. r 4 . DISTRICTS, , 1. App.,,,Sent Received , .-,r..""h ` 'Yes No Yes SCHOOL DISTRICT... _..2.1..c.:';ig tIty4`.' , WATER DISTRICT , 0 r, r ` FIRE DISTRICT '`.f 16,„,,-,.e.)),,,A I*"`'('' V.41 1,-A fz, A PARK DIS. ' .�. TRICT UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY -. S(�srer Ava dable t, YES 0 Nt3 5. PUBLIC UTILITIES Ii ' ; ELECTRICITY ta7g41;,.....:..."' /ILL(....,)_,/,_________/ NATURAL GAS �' � ��:: �� 'et. 4 , , TELEPHONE I e? t r' I .f!' , OTHER r i ' s 6. PUBLIC TRANSIT (TRI MET) ,., .r- v'DEAREST �3US 'ROUTE AZA;- 01 _________`� �° � � '`� 7. OTHER INTERESTED AO,TEI`CIES (SPECIFY) 8. CHARACTER. OF THE AREA , ExISTIIIG LAND USE PLAN 1ESIGNATIt ZONE VERIFIED BV' STAFF #.. c NC3RTRe (7 . q . .ri p E'',µ,,.. L* Nr� , f i I 1L1 ' e: j EAST P BA ' , WEST' , * t. 6` 1+ " '" i n ' (L 13, j, , 41, GENERAL APPLICATION FORM PAGE 3 ' "„� '” CASE' No 11. t CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)539-4171 CITY OF TIGARD 9 9. CHANGES IN' THE; CHARACTER OF THE AREA 1 ICH liC; I " P ICATIOI P lease Discuss: I I i 10. ON OF DESGRIPTITHE' SITE r , Lot Area (acres,, square feet) ; r d ' '" ......,,,,4 ` 11. EXISTING STRtJCTURES ON THE SITE Square Distance from Propert Line Use Fee t North South East West L i I ryk•ti` �L /te�, ,_tit � ,a' �- r__ .t:�t� � I , y , , NATURAL. CONDI.:PION II 5 I I� , 12. Percernt S lope: I 13. Vegetation Types: , I I Average Dame ter Percent Of Each uy I Yes No Site Of Trees Per Site Trees: I I , I. I, .ilrM h/t I ' ., ,. ,... Grasse 14, F1 l Row' much of the site is in f l �, I I } 15. Water Coursea ' A X', tihat type? 16. Ot y C4"C' Q ._,....,y.',....„.. Iv. Other: I lg Pru tiseri ie eloM meat. Please rye I� describe the prep" ex, eveIcint,., w � g ;,. GENERAL APPLICATION FOR/4i. PAGE 4 � i1/4,.,., , 1 iy(''',7/1i CASE No CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, Pa Box 23397 JUL Tigard, Oregon 97223 -` (503')639-4171 ` , I Q . El' eCICY CF TIGARD19. The following isiui . 20. Overall Site Development PLANNING e 8 ' Residential Commer'..cial. Industrial Open. Space Other Roads Total ,� No. of acres or square i feet per use Percent of site coyera;e 21. Type of Residential Use and Characteristics i I of Bedrooms jUni Type of Use # of Units._. EFF. ,1 2 3 4 Proposed Density 22. Where applicable, please explain how the open space,, common are'a's and recreational facilities will be maintained r pE V* �it li I I , . , ,I I I L , I I I I I I I + I I I I I I � I rl , I , II I i I s If the project is to be completed in phases, pleaSe 2:�+ ;p J � describe each phase of the project. 1 1 i" iiv t„:, r i i21 I , • 7t i A'.' 'P)..ease ::submit the, foi1ovrit g r,4i,th this appl cation: 1.. 14r�.ttari 'General Nar?"'ati'V`E'», "ruimber as re Mired' by pl.at:tniri;g- l:iepertuient, t. ,, , Proofof ► .�iersiiip" 3.. Latter .of auttlorization. i 'a licattt Is riot owncr': I _l �` ' pP s ;,,, Tax 'Map, Si a.ff 441,1i.. it,dn ±fy f'Or ,y'1')`n, Whether this de.e tion is, to be, ,;t►mpiie ted , I � II I I , III 9 '+' ' ' 1` GENERAL''APPLICATION,, FOR — PAGE 5 juL1983 CASE N'o. CITY O TIGARD, 12755 'SW Ash, PO Box 2.3397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503')639--41.71 L* Y '.( F TIPARD . PLANNING DEPTH I T1 E FOLLOWING :PEOPLE, AS REQUESTED BY 'THE AP?LICANT, SNALT.� BE `NOTI'FI D; OF EACH'`HEARING. ,Attorney, Surveyor, Erig ..neer) • Staff: Notice Nrtice Reort, Decisiot,, o, p £ Review l r` Name ,1, C. ' ...... • C•ty State Zip game Street City State Zip Nathe S tree City State dip f - I Name S tree t • C3� State Zip APPLICANT • } OWEtt • �F t I I 91 I S I l ..., to, ' y I I i • } r , *************** Ihr1,ra.ccordance with Section 18.84.030(2)(b) of the Zoning Ordinance, every applicant requesting a development proposal is required to meet all PRE APPLICATION CONFERENCE requirements. Please consult the Planning .t' Division concerning these 'requirements.' „, , , ,, -rz)if.,,,„1 .',.r,,l' If \U,./IL,4.i 1 *** *****A.***** C) 1r,,,I r 1983 *********fir**feat* 1 + I OF TI AR PLIkNNING. DEPS" In accordance with Section 18.84.030(2)(b) of the zoning Ordinance, every applicant requesting a development proposal is required to meet all ' PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE*,. ,regirements , Please consult the, Planning Division. concerning these requirt Il .ants. I , ' I **************` u i I , I I �r I ' I I i I i . , ...,. .:.In accordance 111 ordance with Section 18.84.030(2)(b) of the ,tonin Ordinance, every iI I� I W *, applicant requesting a development proposal 'is required to meet ail PRE-APPLICATION CCNFERE NCE. re tiiretxents oIPlease consult thePlanning , Division concerning thee requirements, I { , I 1 t ,k X I fid. In. r 4 ��co dt c am e With Sec�tzt�l l w� � � 84 0.30(2)(b) of the Zoning' Ordl.rance every app1 .giant requesting a de elOpmenit; prtp�osa1 is required to meet all ,l PtIO,. O 'CON R. NC re . .i4. I Rlw � q irementS. Please c.orl.8111t, Ithe Pl,artning; I i- 1 I Davis i,'on.,c,t}Itc.ernin° these 're urn .i e s t 4 q r I *** *'* ,et I I I _ 7 •, THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ENTIAL a. THE IMPACTION XZ D , STRUCTURES AND THE ALTERNATIVES WHICH HAVE THE MINIMUM ADVERSE EFFECT IN TERMS OF: , 1. REDUCING THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE DWELLING AND THE STREET; AND ISE IMPACTS. ' 0 N I I • I ' b. THE EFFECT, THE IMPROVEMENT WILL1I,,1AVE ON THE TRAFFIC FLOW AND THE POSSIBLE NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON OTHER STREET INTERSECTIONS'. 1 ' OF ESE STREET AS PART OF THE ARTERIAL SYSTEM r. MINIMIZING THE IUSE TH I FOP, ' I I FOS, THROUGH TRAI FFIC' . 3.2 THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL WORK WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES S FORTHE E • ' 11. DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARTERIAL ROUTE CONNECTION FROM MURRAY BOULEVARD I OR I II ° ,> � SCROLLS FERRY ROAD TO PACIFIC I 1 HIGHWAY.` THIS ARTERIAL ROUTE' SHC.'ULD BE LOCATED WEST OF BULL MOUNTAIN, ANDISHOULD NOT UTILIZE ROADS WHICH PASS , I I I THF.JUGH EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREAS WITHIN TIGARD. 1 • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES +1,i 1. S.W. Gaarde Street and S.W. 121st Avenue (between Gaard.e and Walnut) i shall s be ,developed a 1 two-lane roadsrwithth pedes tri nbic cyle paths, restricted parking and left tuirning lanes as needed at congested intersections. '" II Avenue south of Walnut) shall be' C 2. me t.�tdeveloped, land along: S.W. 121stiI I planned. for development in accordance with the locational criteria. policies that apply to locating medium and higher densities close to • ;1in arterials and accordanpc@ with the olicxesfor e Establashed and I "Developing" areas I design review" for The Tigard Com�unzt Developmentsite es gtt 3• Code shall require g Y a 11 ny development other than a single or two family' structure, , The site design review' shall include review of street` right-of--sway. and pavement l location,. D . ORCAN,IZATIC?N ��4 , 11.� NEIGH110RHG0 LANt�ING� I i I 1 I a POLICY 1 I I I E E. 't T ARE BOUNDED By PACIEI.0 H•ICHi Ay 1 1 I 11.A�1 I N THE r TIG'ARD TRIANGLE �,Y 'x 1A A 1,IG11WA' ': 217 AND Tt#E• XNTERSTATE 5- `REEt4A' )s IN THOSE PARCELS DESIGNATED '`CP"y HIGH. DENstTY RES1bENTIAL DEVELOPMENt (I.E. 20 TO 40 UNITS PER ACRE) SHALL BE A USE ALLOWED OUTRIGHT IN I CONJUCTION W1.T1-1. COMMERCIAL 1 PROFESSIONAL USES. I r 11, ,l 3.1 tlED�� I N� �POLICY � THtI� P�A�CEL',5 THE•' � CARb TRIANGLE D IN TtESCRI It D S`,IG NATED FOR 'ANS`` COOMMEII CIAL DEVELOPMENT_ SHALL, NOT DEVELOP FCR. SUCH H I I USEIP` NOT ALREADY SO DEVELOPED UNLESS A MAJOR COLLECTOR, CONNECTING' THE AREA ON PAC'IP:IC HIGHWAY AT APZP'ROI I'ATEL"Y 78TH AVENUE AND THE I1 11 I I I I 1 WESTERLY PORTION OF HAINES ROAD INTERCHANGE AT INTERSTATE FREEWAY (AT ' APPROXIMATELY 69TH AT DARTMOUTH) BE CONSTRUCTED, BE GUARANTEED WITHIN ONE YEAR FOR CONSTRUCTION BY A PUBLIC AGENCY, OR BE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION AS A PART OF A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AFTER THE REMONSTRANCE AND REVIEW PERIOD HAVE EXPIRED. a. THIS CONDITION SHALL NOT APPLY TO PARCELS HAVING DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PIC HIGHWAY, OR THE INTERSTATE 5 FREEWAY ACCESS RAMPS UNLESS ORTION PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT IS GREATER THAN 1000' FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY OR INTERSTATE 5 INTERCHANGE RAMPS. I' I I �+ D IN THE TRIANGLE RMIT E IS FE T b. UNTIL NEW COMMERCIAL THE ONLY NEW DEV1�LOl'IyiENT 7t`HAT MAY OCCUR ON UNDER THIS. CONDITION, 4N? PARCEL SIN' THE TRIANGLE, IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE. I I I r r - 11.5 PLANNING ORGANIZATION #�S NEIGHBORHOOD' FINDINGS o As Tigard ,has continued to develop the locational advantages associated r, i ,h the the 1-5 freeway, Highway 217 , and the two railroad lines traversing the area have,�I led toa co n sxderabl.e amount �f office and ' industrial development along72nd Avenue, south of Highway 21 . The 'residential. aea. abuttiri.g the industrial area in NPO 5 o �.he established � r 'has been '`adversely affected by the individual use, 'due to increased smoke, , { noise, odor or visual pollution. 0 The pol.utiorl of eXis titig vegetation and.-tire y `an+di pradtin"- Iff"treta provide arta excellent means to both , Separateand buffer residential areas' from industrial areas. 'These. vegetative ' buffers, exist along the western ' I slopes bordering the 'Rolling Hills Subdivision and along Fenno Creek. The Rolling Hills Subdivision, abuts industrially planned land on two sides ,and is within approximately 600 feet of land planned for heavy industrial; use. 11 P l .5.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE B'OFFERINC AND SCREENINC , BETWEEN RESIDEN7,1AL AREAS AND ADJOINING INODSTRPRECONDITIIAL AREAS AS A Oki TO DEVELOPMENT � u " 'APPROVAL AS FOLLOWS: , ' a. ' ALL BUILGINCS ON INDUSTIttAL LAND SMALL BE SET BACK. A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET FROM ANY PROPERTY LINE, WHICH ABUTS A RESIDENTIALLY PLANNED AREA� I i i I • 4 THE, SITE PLAN SHALL PROVIOP FOR � I LEA T1�lE S I .PROP PROPOSEDD USES ON THE SITE LN THE AREAS WHICH ABUT AN' Al JOININC RESIDENTIAL PLANWEt/ AREA AND , , I I ; , I I I , cirifoF, TIFARD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON , NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION J The final decision was filed �y PLANNING COMMISSION Concerning CPA 13-83 dri li September 13,. 1983 Case Number Date 2.. Name of owner. 0,,XXXICX1ilik1111611 N/A 3. Name of Applicant: Carl Johnson Address 6155 SW Bonita RoadCity Take Grove Or. State 4. Location of Property: Address, SW corner of 69th and Atlanta Legal Description NPO # 4 East of 72nd Ave. West Portland heights 5. Nature of Application:` : COMPREHENS IVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO', ALLOW DEVELOPMENT' ion., EAST OF 72nd Correcting Policy 11.4 6. Action: App royal as requested 1 ap Approval with conditions p t XX Denial 7. Notice: *Notice was published it the newspaper & was mailed to: The applicant & owners II XXX I ; OOwnersr � of record within the required distance kxx The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization f i I I Affe t c edoVernm ental gagencies XXX �Tf there are. nes tions r ardin the names...' . � of the erso . _ q g gp hs or agencies who . `s available at the Planning Department. received notice, this information s 8. Final Decision. I } The adopted ted findin s of fact decision and, statement .of condit yon �' � � � � fan. he obtained froth the Planning nirecor, City of Tigard, City Hail, 12755 8W Ash, P.O. Eos 8339/,, Tigard, Oregon X23 In �y I R d the'�✓ i•. Y "4 'Y. y�¢� Y.. � case ��" a dec�s�.©� on an ,app�.�ce.t�on for ,a �'s��:anoe, the apph�,can must ac t'owledge this form and return it to the City ,of Tigard* > ianniag Director, before any building permits Will be issued or engineeeing apPrOVal given. Signature of Applidant or App ..icant,s Agent Date , I / J r • • 9. Appeal:. An .appeal has (been �f' led has not been filed. • e ea'� t ,i.s de;isiO i n accordance �. No,,te. Any party to tilr dec sior4 may apA �,�. "' witty Sect on 18.84.250, which pr vides that.a written appeal may be filed, within fourteen days, after notle i,s g •ven and .lento 'Notice is given on Sent mb t ti t AR '� (therefore: the .deadline for fi 1 i ng of an'appeal i s �_ temb r ,. ..-• 10. Quest ns: If you; have any 4uesti.ons, pl easel call the City o�F` �'igarc� �. planning Department, 639-4'171 ,, ' • 3f I I, • 4. I I I I I I I II I a f