Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SUB1991-00019
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. :s75 SW 90th Ave. 1 '?5DB 1 ..2601 'AYIg C1Ak:Y..YJ:GkRL:t1 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Wash; ngLon City of Tigard ss. a being first duly sworn /affirm, on oath depose and ar a J (Please print) That I am a (., The City of Tigard, Oregon That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: " hat I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR - City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard .Planning Commission Tigard Herrings Officer - Tigard City Council for A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named attached Ust marked exhibit "B" on the said notice NOT1CF OF DE ] SX,ON as hexe o bulletin board on the Yi 'day of „a' ,r. in the United states Mai:, -on the oc+tage prepaid. Pec9sion) 01' which is attached (Marked sono at the,,,.�a dress shown can the day of 19.i 1.- attached,. was posted on , a appropriate ,® .0 3.9_' _ and deposited day f sr ; 3- 4 �= , .19_ f ___ " repa ed Eyrotict ,.o..,.�.�..�.,�. ( For Doeis 3.eoan On a l�r 9 r i k p FyK Int 'I ...S11100 c; ibec ., afid; swo;; n/a `f i nn to zda Me on the day of Person who delivered too POST OFF7CE NOTARY PUBLIC s F OREGON My Commission Expires: v.:Ir -46 -' 19 Sub and sworn /affirm to Brie on the day of OFS1C!IAL SEAT. la, OANN HAYES NOTARY p05LIC•DREGON COMMISSION NO, 006513 MY COMMIS510N EXPIRES m FY 5, 1905 bl /AFFIDAV. LK14 ��yComm lion Expires: OT A.;�x UBLIC OF 0 11473... CITY OP TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY RINGS OF '108= g ) ' • Concerning Case • Name of rimers to he±rn i s . er Name of A.ppl icant s Baare+ ..� ..,...... ......�.��....�.� • Address �L1375 P� 9 h Aime e �.�.... City 212ar0 state ®R.. Zip 2.7g2.3_,_ . Address of Property: s Aa a SW 90th Avenue Tax Map and Lot No (e) : ISI 35DB 'pax of _ 2601 Requests c uee o 3a d .vie al to di .xi.de a, p acee Approximat_ly_laailimmuatinto four lots between 1,500 and! 18. ®97 square feet each Akan a°e .e® a is variairrce a gar av='l to allow a modified cul-de-sac., . ZONE: iden ' ial 4.5 nits acre The H-4. 5 toeag.na allows s1 ngke fa�p.A detached reed ®ntiaA uaa.ic fu r faei9..f.tiea , identia1 treatment, eo n :., f „area n _, manufactured homes,, fanni% as care• h oo ations t.j /m ar too aria a ®icien3 ink fuel tars arum other uses. 6. Action: oat: Approval as 'reque &red X Approval With condi1ien, Denial 7. No Notice was published in the newspaper, y , sand mailed to. � �� ®.d at City Full yt_ . The applicant and owner(s) Own►rs of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Panning Organization Affected governmental agencies B. Final Dec ,atom: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL O __Dowell h 3 1992 UNLESS AN .APPEAL IS FILED. The adopter findings of fact., decision, and statement of coz1itiona can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigaa d City Hall, 13125 SW Hall, P.O. }fox 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. Appeal: y party c? decision in rt to the decision may appca�, this h 2.290(B) and Section 18.32.370 Which provides that QC accordance with 18, ■3 The appeal 1 filed within a0 days after notice is given and sent The eal ma • be Submitted on city forms and music be avert�,lnappeal ma o accompanied b the appeal fee ) pt casts (varies up p �` pP_ ($315.06 and transcript to a maximum of $500.00 The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3'430 p. n. March 3 1992 10. Sxuestions s If you have any quesbione, please call the city of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171. bkm /SUB91 1.+ 80 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE, CITE` OF `TIGARD, OREGON In the matter of an application by Craig Silt-A. het al, for ) approval of a prelnnainary plat for a 4-lot subdivision ) and cul-de-sae variance south of SW Wako a. Street ) west of SW 90th Avenue in the C ty of Timmy Oregon ) 1. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST . a 12 acres into a 4 The applicant requests approval of a preliminary plat to subdivide about 1. lot subdivision op�;�sed lots comply. with the a io a ° requirements n of the R -4..5� zone. One lot viii contain existing .twe g, three (Residential) elo with single family detached dwellings. The applicant will dedicate and improve a cul de ac south of the eximmg stub of SW 91st Court and will execute an agreement not to remonstrate against imigovernent of 90th Avenue fronting the site A variance is needed for the ci l de sac, because it will not comply with City standards for cul de sac right of way. Three new lots will have meet minimum frontage requirements on the proposed cul de sac, the fourth lot has adequate frontage on 90th Avenue. Hearings Officer; Larry Epstein held a duly noticed public hearing on iebruary 10, 1992 to consider the application. City staff recommended apprt gal of the subdivision subject to FINAL ORDER SUB 91-0019. VAR 9121 (Dakota Groves No 2) conditions. The applicant accepted the recommended conditions of approval. No one testified orally. One resident of a home along 90th Avenue raised concern about trc impacts on that street. LOCATION 11375 SW 90th Avenue; WCTM 1S1 35BD, Tax lot 2601 ZONING R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acres) APPLICANTS eft PROPERTY OWNERS: Craig & Cynthia er Orville Sller i , 5 W 90th Ave 3275 Brush Rd Tig ard, OR 97223 Salem, OR 97304 Alpha Engineering REPRESENTED BY: Sfl'E AREA: About 1.12 acres APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Cli. 18.50, 18.88, 18.92, 1.150, 18.160, and 18.164 and Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 4 2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3,1, 7,4.4, f .1 , 1, and 8,1.3, Resolution and Order 91-47 STAFF P.ECOI NDATION: Conditionally approve HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION: Conditionally approved II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. The Hearings Officer incorporates by orates b reference the findings aboat the site and i surroundings in Section II of the City of 'Tigard Staff Report dated February 10, 1992, with the following amendments: 1. Proposed have the followin g dimensi onal and basic solar access chaPacterisn.esa Page 1 - Hearings Officer dethibn SUB 91 -0019 (Dakota Groves 2) and VAR 91 -0021 ;;;( ` -I « 1 110 feet 2 65 feet 3 80 feet 4 50 feet LOt 18,057 square feet 8500 square feet 9000 square feet 10,228 square feet h 110 feet. 110 feet 78 few 95 feet Exit 1.91 angit 90' .Y ow E-W 60° from E -W E -i 60° from E -W 2. The applicant proposes that protected solar building lines be shown on proposed lots 2 and 4 to comply with the solar access standards for new development. The protected solar building line on lot 2 will be within' the rear yard setback. The protected solar butliing line on lot 4 will be 31 feet from the south property line of that lot. The applicant proposes to im p ose solar access performance restrictions on proposed lot 3. This will require the house on that lot be have a long axis within 30 of a true east -west line, have at lease. 80% of the song wall of the house unshaded and have at least 32% of the glazing in the home and at least 500 square feet of roof asrea facing within 30° of a true east west line, The applicant requests an adjustment. to the solar access standards for proposed lot 1, because the aliment of SW 90tlr Avenue is such that the lot cannot comply with the basic solar access standard for new deveioprr►en, 3. Land north and south of the site's 90th Avenue frontage is substantially developed with single fannly homes from Greenberg Road to Dakota Street, tnakhig it unlikely the City will be able to Ire-quire improvement of other frontages along 9Oth Avenue as a condition of approval of potential development, because there is likely potential development opportunity there. 4. SW 91st Court extends north to Dakota Street. There are 12 lots for single family detached dwellings under development along 91st Court between the site and Dakota Street ix' a plat identified as "Dakota Groves". The applicant did not plat the Dakota Groves subdivision. From Dakota Street, traffic can travel west to several north- south streets and Greenberg Road or east to 90th Avenue and south to Greenberg Road. These roads serve single family housing. Land adjoining the site to the south is a flag . by flag p . shared with one lot with direct access to 90th Avenue b means of a fla pole, which is other flag lot. Land further south has access to SW 91st Avenue, which ends ion a cul de sac south of the flag lot south of the site 5. The site contains about 20 trees with a diameter more than 6 inches, based on the prelimina.ry plat. The applicant did not submit a tree removal plan. However, about 5 trees are in the right of way for the proposed .eul de sac, and, therefore, are likely to be removed: One or two other trees are situated in the building envelope for pmposc d lot 2, and, therefore, may have to be removed for a structure on that lot. M. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Community Development Code 1. . Chapter ` `' : contains : •ds for the �o e��.ots in the zone aged stru ty det ► ached resg�lei�tsal un�it5i0 a rrnitted use in the � zone. A Single ��ctures on those lots must comply with the following dimensional requirements: Front setback ..:'. . . 20 feet Interior side setback . 5 feet Silva side setback ..:15 feet (20 feet garage) Minimum lot size...:: 7500 sq ft Ave. min. lot width... 50 feet Rear setback b :..::.. 15 feet Max. bldg, height.:.:: 30 feet` Page 2 - Bearings Officer decision SUB 91 -0019 (Dakota Groves 2) and VAR 01- 0021' "- "YN;., a5� :NYC �iai ��i..Y:^ Sul.^ *G �. �.'t•�,'.. ,IJ? 2. Chapter 18.88 contains solar access standards. A lot complies with this chapter if it has a north-south dimension of 00 feet, Dr more and has a front lot line that is oriented . within 30 degrees of a true east-west was, or if a protected solar building line is designated on the plat or on documents monied with the play or if solar pert rmance- oriented standards are Wised on fug structures. A subdivision complies with this station if 80% cr more of the newly created loth comply with this stanclaxd, a. Section 18.88.040(E) (Adjustments to Design Standards) state that, the approval authority shall reduce the pert nmge of lots that must comply with Section 1&88. 0(C) (Design Standards) the minimum extent necessary if it finds the applicant has shown it would reduce density, si'gnificantly increase development cost, or elhardnate amenities, or if shade from existing trees already obstructs solar access for a given lot. 3. Chapter 18.92 contains standards for density. The number of dwelling units pedm i for based 'c roads ®rd development ea, excluding sensitive land areas and land ,� �a� errt dedicated p parks. To determine the number of lots, multiply the net development area by the number of units allowed per acre in the van. 4. Chapter 18.150 requires a permit and contains standards for removal of trees having permit for tree removal ° � with above . » » undeveloped land. A a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter 4 feet above the and on pe moval must comply with the following criteria: a. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, interfere with futility service or traffic safety; b. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable wanner; c. The trees are not needed to ev pr ent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; d. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance het een shade and o pen space; e. The aesthetic chsracter in the as will not he visually adversel y affected by the tie removal; and vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will replace► of tree �- the aesthetic value f. New v y' s to be cuts S� Chapter 18.160 contains standards f r land divisions. To be apprve:d, a preliminary plat must comply with the following criteria: It must comply City per, .. plan a� st coxni l with the � *� 's coon n�hensa� a Dan and the applicable zoning ordinance and other applicable ordinances and regulations; me is proposed plat P� the u; platted is The ro used lot na not duplicative, unless the land to be c , •gu the to and platted by the site that platted the . p . � . cor, you pP. party T subdivision originally a.-�n tl�e aaara�e, or unless the a hcant dales and record the consent of the party .. » a plat otherwise that platted the subdivision originally beating the name, and the plat otlr�i`�vis satisfies the provisions of ORS Chapter 92, Page 3 Hearings O/f eer decision SUP 91 -0019 (Dakota Grove 2) and VAI? P1 4021 ese ce The starts and toads are laid out so as to conform to the plats of subdivisions and maps of major partitions ahvadY approved for adjoining property as to width, general direction and in all other respects unless the Qty detemimes it is in the public interest to modify the strew, or road pattern 6. Variances to the Code develo p ent stand ds may be appreved lf� a. There are special chrumstances or conditions ttffecting the property which are unusual and pecuhar to the land as compared to other lands similarly situated; b. The variance is necessary for the proper design or function of the subdivision, The granthig of the variance will not be de;tellnental to the public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to the tights e f other owners of property and d. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right because of an extraordinary hards�nip which wou,d result from strict' compliance with the regulations of this title. 7. 18, 164 contains Standards dads for sneers and utilities. a. Section 18.164.030(A) reglres streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of the street, However, Section 1 8.164.030(A)(1)(c)(i i) authorizes the approval authority to accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of improvements if Diar, to the nature existing development on adjacent properties roperties it is „` oe y improvements wo uld be extended in the foreseeable le future and the improvements associated with the projeict. under review d oes not, by itself, provide a significant improvement for a.eeet safety or capacity. b. Section 18.1(4.030(E) requires a cut de sac p minimum 42- ' to be iixi roved with a t paved ght of way local street is foot section Let�ween curbs in a 50-foot radius � 4 required to have a 34 -foot paved section between curbs in a 50 -foot right of way. • () cul-de-sac e shall be as short as possible, not c. Section 18 164.03t'� 1{ states that a more than 400 feet long, and shall terminate a circular turnaround. de Section 18.1..060 prohibits lot depth from being more than 2 -1 /a 'rimes the lot width and requires at least 25; feet of frontage on a street. e. Section 18.164.020 requires sidewalks adjoining all local residential streets. f. Section 18.164.090 requires sanitary see k r service. g. Section 18.164.100 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff. B. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. L Policy 2,1.1 provides the City will wi l a assure ens will be provided an opportunity for be involved in all phases of the planning gldess. Page 4 - Hearings Officer decision SUB 91 -0019 (Ozkofa Groves 2) and VAR 91 -0021 Pitt 71 2. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all devtielopments within the Tigard Urban Planning Azea shall comply with applicable federal, State and regional water quality standards. 3. Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 provide the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, hewer, and storm drainage will be provided ` and designed to (City standards and utilities. placed underground. 4. Policy 8.1.1 p ovides the City wili 1.1 for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. 6. Pali 5.1,E provides the City l require as precondition o Policy P 1' City M � l � � of' approval that: a. Development abuts a dedicated street ( r has other adequate access; b. Street right of way shall be dedicated whoa the street is substandard in width; c., The developer shat commit to constcuctibh of the streets, cubs and sidewalks r City Standards within the development; and d. Street improvements shall be made and stet signs or signals shall be prt4viide+ when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. C. Resolution and Order 91-47. Resolution and (lrder 91 -47 requires all new developments that add additional impervious surface to include a water quality treatment facility. IV. HEARING, TESTIMO ', AND NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS A Hearing. received testimony the public hearing this application o. The �3%arings Officer rec ' . y p bllc hean� about � on February 1091992 A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties 1 ' are Exhibit the Ti Pmc _ g imd Exhibit C Mitten Testimony). These of Record), ]�7ChYblt B �� i Aa.CO�ee'I�1�,4 s'�9 exhibits at a g City L 1, Jerry Offer testified for the City and sumlnarfred the staff rep and 90th Avenue raising concerns about the impact t of additional traffic 90th Avenue; recommendation. of 11450 SW g p $ he responded to the concerti raised in the letter, Jerry applicant. accepted oended 2. Je Palmer testified for the a hcalat, I3e secs ted. the conditions �c by City staff. C. NPO and Agency Comments: Hearings The 1�Ie g Officer incorporates by reference the NPO and agency cents Sections IV and V of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated Pebruaq 10, 1992. Page 5 e srarii gs Officer decision SUB 91 -0019 (Dakota Groves 2) and VAR 91 -0021 i day w ur .;, o I _Y i _..1 i� .•'i '�' +�'_. "wu,. t • o. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. Compliance with Community Development Coca, 1. The proposed lots comply with the use standards of the R-4.5 zone, because they will be used for single family detached dwelling units. The Jots comply with the dirinensioitai standaris of the R -4.5 zone, because they .ead$ ttontain at least 7500 square feet g .. setbacks, dwelling on eet lot 1 will and tame �comply t with of m feet. ' tan owe but the shed. proposed proposed lot 2 must be remov d r relocated to con ly, a condition to that effect is P warranted. 2. The proposed subdivision complies with Chapter 18.88, because proposed lots 2 and 4 will comply with the protected solar building line option and proposed lot will comply with the performance option, provided appropriate conditions are imposed and 'implemented. An adjustment is warranted pursuant to Section 18 88 440(E)(1)(a)(iii) for proposed lot 1, because the existing alignment of 90th Avenue preepudes °cdenting lot 1 so that it complies with the basic solar standard. 3. "The m sed subdivision complies with the density standards of Chapter 15.92, because t net developable area the site divided by 4.5 units per acre equals 6 lots and only 4 lots are proposed. 4. The proposed subdivision will cornply with Chapter 18.150, provided the applicant obtains a tree removal permit before removing trees. 5 The proposed subdivision complies with Chapter 18.160, because: a. complies p plan map designation of the site, the It coin hes �iLh the Comprehensive lan rna . applicable plan policies, the regulations of the R -4e5 zone, and other applicable regulations. • e • b . The proposed ... n is similar to the name of the adjoining b '4'1�. �rro used name of the su&sdt psxo provide e Dakota 4iroves subdivision. "The applicant di use of that name by the who platted Dakota Groves Therefore, a condition is g pp P .. Y P applicant provide such consent or to change warranted requiring the a lica�at to vide and record sue the name of the plat to comply with this section and ORS 92. c The extension of SW 91st Court into the site conforrtas to the plat of the adjoining subdivision to the north. There is no need to extend 91st Court south of the site, because land to the south is developed and has adequate access to SW 90th Avenue or SW 91st Avenue, based on finding 11 A.4; 6. A variance to the coal de sac standard is warranted based on the following fn mggs a. The north - south dimetiision of the site represents a special circumstances that affect the property. If the eul de sac complies with the applicable standards, the remaining north-sou th dimension of the site is inadequate to provide a building envelope south of the right of way. Therefore, compliance with the cid de sac standard will eliminate one lot from the subdivision, ccr teary to the desirable density for the site based on its Comprehensive Plan designation and associated energy conservation and service efficiency goals. Page d Hearings Officer d2tcisinn 51113 91 -0019 (Dakota Grodes 2) (Ind VAR 91 -0021 1R;9R9, )>DIL b. The variance is necessary to prevent elimination of one lot. c. The mating of the variance will not be detrimental to the publin health, safety and welfare or the rights of owners of other properties, because, access can be provided to other properties without compliance°, with the radius standards, provided the turn - around is designed to allow access by City cleaning equipment (a minimum 22 -foot paved radius), the adjoining driveway Toms are designed to withstand loads of emergency equipment, and no ;parking i gns are installed in the cul de sac. Conditions to this effect are warranted9 d. Denial of the variance would result in an extraordinary hardship to the applicant, because of the loss of at least one lot. 7. The proposed subdivision can comply with Chapter 18.164, because: 91 st Court t+�a the City. right of wa a. The applicant will dedicate ��� 91st � way is not needed for to Avenue.. The applicant can execute a r onnemonstrance agreement for improvement te 30Th Merlin because adjoining development makes it unlikely that harm impsoixratents will be made ii c rementaUly along the street, and improvement of the site's frontage e is of negligible value by itself. Although the subdivision will contribute traffic to 90th Avenue, and that streets not improved to standard, the impact on that street due to traffic from the subdivision is negligible given the number of dwellings that ahead have access to that snit. Some tragic from the subdivision will travel west on Dakota Street, so not all traffic from the subdivision will use 90th Avenue. b. Proposed 91st Court will have a negligible grade. c. The proposed lots are consistent with Code standards for maximum lot depth-to- width ratio, minimum lot, frontage, and other lot standards. d. The etreet on the site will be improved consistent with the street standards except as otherwise allowed herein. e. All lots will be served by public water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems. Conditions are warranted Xed to require the applicant to situate a standard manhole at the terminus of the sewer line, rather than a clean -out as shown on the preliminary plat. f. SW 91st Court will be improved with a turn - around that can accommodate emergency and service vehicles. B. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies. 1.. The subdivision complies with Policy 2.�, .1, because notice of the application, or 1 g was provided o g ,hgva a , to the community hearing organization, to and to owners planning organization, an� ado of tie. site. y Y planning g property vicinity 2. In order to comply with Policy 4.2Y 1, a condition is warranted to require the �, applicant t® prepare an erosa ®n plan as part d Resolution � and Order 91-47 ��, tent with standards for the Tualatin River Basin an of the grading permit application, consistent subsequent amendments thereto. Page 7 • liearirigs t7t,7 er decisiol SUB 91.00,19 (Dakota Groves 2) and VAR 91 -0021 _el 3. The subdivision complies with Policies., 73.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4, because the applicant will extend public sewer and water system to the site, will provide a storm drainage plan and will provide underground utilities. 4 The 'ubdivision will comply with Policy 8.1.1 and 8.1.3, because the subdivision provides e safe and efficient street system and isicludes dedications and improvements necessary d w that system. C. Compliance Oh Resolution and Order 9147, The proposed Ilse comply with Resolution and. Other 9147 by providing on -site surface water q; ty s or alternatives permitted by laws VI. arm VISIT By BEARINGS OFFICER The Hearings Officer visited the site and sdax'oundirg area. VI. CONCLUSION AND DECISION The Flemings Officer concludes that the proposed subdivision and variance will promote the general weifau of the City, and will not be significantly derrimental nor injurious to surrounding land uses, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal law. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and n cor►kxoratialg the Staff Report and other reports of affected agencies and public testimony and ex Mbits received in this matter, the Hearings Officer hereby approves SUB 91 -0019 (Dakota, Groves 2) and VAR 91 -0021, subject to the following conditions; UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL C ®ND1T ONS SHALL BE sAnsmED AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITE'` OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUBDIVISION. Staff contact for all conditions is Chris Davies, Engineering Division, 639 -4171, unless otherw; _ , , Dt THE A.PPLIC1 NT SHALL COMPLY WITH TEIE FOLLOWING COND1TIOWW'S BEFORE THE FINAL PLAT IS FILED WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY profile rfil pp twe (2) of detailed public improvement plans and U e construction drawings to the Engineering i . 1. P The applicant shall submit twc 2 sets eon fox preliminary review and approval, The applicant ,p 1 p shall submit seven C7�s sets f approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, The plans and estimate shall be prepared by a professional Tonal engineer ri licensed eS in hould Oregon. These plats are in addition to plans required Building g ` i i d include only those sheets relating to public im proveixientso assurance r the construction �f all public s City approval, and provide financial 2. The applicant shall submit lens, obtain p streets within the subdivision and for a storm drainage system to serve the subdivision, These mrprovernents shall be designed and constructed in ace y com feted and acc� requirements of the Ci,�, of T p accordance with there ted by the Cl within the gird, The improvements shall be T `time frame specified in the public assurance contract. p Y City Page g - hearings U,f,#'fcir ,dcoBsori SUB 91 -0019 (Dakota Groves 2) and VAR 91 -0021 3. `t'le applicant shall submit a grading plan showing exi.stirg and proposed contours and typical finished floor elevations on each lot, including elevations at 4 different Jorners of the floor plan tied to the top of the curb elevations as shown on the public improvement plans. 4. The app all submit and receive approval of an erosion control plan. Tie plan applicant shall shall confc to "Evasion Control Plans - T kcal Guidance Handbook," November, 1989_ 5. The applicant shall make an appointment for a pre-construction meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of the plans but prior to starting any work on the site. The applicant, applicant's engineer, and contractor shall attend this meeting before receiving ig approved plans/permits 6. The applicant also shall install and maintain a water quality facility that complies with Resolution and Order 91-47 cis approved and adopted by the tai tl✓d Sewerage Agency. The City Engineer may waive this requirement to the extent allowed by regulations of the Environmental Quality Commission and Unified Sewerage Agency as they exist at the time public improvement plans are approved. 7. The applicant shall revise the preliminary plat as necessary to: a. structures o� ath ® those Imes building lines unless through 4 and specify that s authorized by the Ci of Tigard Planning Division. Contact Jerry fter, Planning Diw ►ision (639-4171); and g � g a� �. b. Identify right of ways and dedications for public sir °t on and ad; bitting the site. 8. The applicant shall impose solar access Perforrmance standards on lot 3 in a declaration 18.88.040(C)(3). Contact ��s Offer, Planning Division, eplat, consistent with Section • y , g ... (639- 4171). 9. The applicant shall change the name of the subdivision so that it is not duplicative of names of other subdivisions in the County, unless the applicant submits and files written consent of the party that platted the subdivision originally bearing the name Dakota Groves to use the name Dakota Groves 2 10. The applicant and subsequent purehasers shall not remove trees with a trunk diameter larger than 6 inches measured 4 feet above grade unless the Planning Division issues a tree removal permit for that purpose. Trees with a trunk diameter larger than 6 inches measured removed for streets, utilities, and residences, and t® allow for gra din g pp oved Site may, incorporate curved sidewalks and driveways, and shared driveways t azaximize tree preservation. Tree removal permits may be granted ino stages: ,. ,JYic right of way preparation and lot preparation. The applicant shall provide for an a rboxist to review the plans for grading and ee protection. The arborist or Planning Division may prescribe protective measures for trees to be retained on the site A� not covered by structures o u imperious surfaces shall e re-v egetated ; a s soon ES possible tier completion of grading. A copy of the removal permit and a p Fved grad ing plan shall be available on -site during all tree removal and grading acts vitea, Contact Jerry Offer, Planning Division, 639.4171. Page 9 Hearings Officer decision SUB 91 -0019 (Dakota C, o es 2) and Vim' 91 -0021 wassriaeggemagattangat 11. The applicant shall dedicate to the City right of way for SW 91st Ceurt necessary and shall improve a minimum 22 -fit radius paved between � i cry~ ray �� sc��•�oaa and sidewalk, unless an alternative design is approved by the En t, Division and Fir District The driveway aprons . g �s is 2 and 4 sly `e I��s� and adjoining rbs for a'tadate a live load of at least 12,500 pounds.'iho applicant shat install "no parking' signs in the cul de sac. The description of the dedication shall be tied to the existing right of way centerline. The dedication shall be on City forms. lastrUctaons are available from die Engineering Department 12. Existing building that am not removed pursuant to ap valid demolition exalt shall that they y applicable �k re��!uarem ts. Contact Brad be situated such Division 639 -�17 a lac�ble tba�v Roast, Building ( ) la 13. The preliminary preliminary lat shall be limited to the c}°�;atiora of ten lots, fully din nsianed on the plat and consistent with R-4.5 zoning district dOensional regifirements, ORS 92, Tigard Cornmu Laity Development Cock Chapter 18.160, a' d applicable ',Washington County standards. 14. The applic ant shall submit t to the of Tigard Engineering Department a mylar copy of the girded subdivision plan 15. The apnlicant shall execute.' and record an agicement on loans provided by the City that waives he right of owners of lot 1 to oppose or remonstrate against a future local pr !prove SW 90th Avenue: improvement anent. distract fi�rtxaed to SUBDIVISION APPROVAL BE VALID ONLY IF THE FINAL PLAT IS RECORDED WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE Or mIS DECISION. 0 n icer Page 10 Hearings O ce, decision SUB 91 -0019 (Dakota Groves 2) aid VAR 91 -0021 TANGEL 01 g1tol dstt A mot ::sprpass- t,lttau complied by ties City sr 1leetd et11lL3e11 Caodie- pits toIe etioe $ystea► t li( settee's. !atsi- bzilae Peftreyet "v.ers 2107 sr :-:raided is }s ertN sit.h eddit tosi T B 'tsaeet:sl nadi r Interittetellrf Otte 0s 44t4raiasd ty fY the City •t ttgerd': (MP3®lltD) 100 ('13134111) STEPHIM & CYNTHIA A SIB; 12375. SW 90TH AVE TCA[ OR . 97223 awatorz & `; tozs I E t X275 BRUSH COLLEGE RD SAtM OR 517304. JERRY PALMER A '&� ENGINEERIVG INC 9600 SW QM STE 230 TIGARD OR 97223 ED DUFFIELD 8895 SW EDGEWOOD TIGA1 D • at 97223 1 Pi:a+r���+�.�� AGENDA ITEM STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER MONDAY, 'F FEBRUARY 10, /992 - 7 00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 L. SUMMARY OF ME REQUEST CASE: DAmOz. GROVES NO 2 SUBDIVISION SubdiviOion SUB 91 -0019 Variance VAR 91 -0021 • StUMMALtY. The applicants request subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide an approximately 1 12 acre site into four lots ranging in s, 18,057 square feet. A variance is y ire between r9, 500 and requested to Cou�nux�ii�. Development Coda Section 18.164.030.E which requires that cul de sac: streets terminate in a circular turnaround. A non- Circular turnaround is proposed to complete SW 113th Court. APPLICANT: Craig and Cynthia Siler Orville and Lois Carol SLler 11375 SW 90th Avenue 3275 Brush College Road Tigard, OR 97223 Salem, 011 97304 OWNERS: Same AGENT: Alpha Engineering Plaza 'West, Svtite 230 9600 SW Oak Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE COMPREHENS/VE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential atdent.al ZONING DESIGNATION: R -4.5 (R.eeidential, 4.5 1, ata acre) LOCATION: 11375 SW 90th Avenue (WCTM x. '' ^x Loy: 2601) 350Ra T APPLICA$L E L.., A. Y : Community Development cde chapter's 18,50: 18 . S8, 18. 9 3; 18 . 150, 18.160, 18. 164, and Comprehensive Plan Polic lod 2. 1.1, 442 1, 7.1.2, 7 . 3.1, 7.4.9, 8. A.1, and 8.1.3 Q0 ,- STAPIP RECOMMENDATION: " Approval of the S- xbdivisio n pr li �n^ Plat subject to conditions. Approval of the Subdivision � e . II . FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS Vite size and Shape: Tax Lot 2601 contains 1.12 acres and .s r'�ctAugular in shape witA g p t -west a� feet of fronta� e on SW 90th' Avenue and 445 feet 04 ae t�� ens . Site 1ocat i.on2 D11 the h Avenue, approximately The site 3.s located on �-.._. west side of SW 9,'Ut 340 feet south of SW North Dakota St reet. SW 91st Court stubs into the northwest.".rn, portion ecently developed Dakota Groves subdivision,. sr 92 t Court extends southward from, SW North Dakota Street. Exist, in uses and structures The site P r esentl Y contains a single fam ily y residence set back approximately 45 feet from SW 90th Avenue. A Small shed is located southeast of the house. The site is surrounded by a chain link fence. Teco trapy and drainage The crest of a knoll exists on the western portion o!2 the site, with than majority of the site draining to the east towards SW 90th hvenue. Plan desiggation and zoning,. The site and adjoining properties in all directions are designated Low Plan Zap and are zoned Its -4'a 5 Densit Residential on the Comprehensive (Residential, 4.5 units /acre). Suxroundin2 lama ue,ea t, Properties surrounding the site contain single family residencsa. The Dakota Groves subdivision which contains 12 ` lots is under development to the north of the site. sW 91st Court extends through Dakota Groves from SW North 'Da m a Street to the edge of the aub,;'ect pacoperty. G. po$ed. t e,,,: : : lap proposes � site into four iota ranging in size The applicant from 8,500 to 18,057 s to fe‘e. gle illustrated on the 'preliminary, plat. One Lot which would 'include the existing house wo: ,kid front on SW 000th Avenue.' 2'he other lots woua?.d front on a modified cul de sac turn around ext aYesio a of SW 91st Court.. The 1c►ts are intended for single family residential use.` I. Public services utilities: The preliminary "ur ? :Litt' plain proposes that propo ►ed lots 2, 3 and 4 be `. 'he existing house is already served by eatentai ►��s of sanitary sewer and pater lines from y Coctrt in the Dakota Groves su)adivisi�on. � 91�y served by sanitary sewer and water. 'Storm drainage for lots 2, 3, and 4 is Proposed to be provided by surface drainage to a catch basin in Sty 91st Court. Streets and acceq,: tie site has 110 feet of frontage along , _..,.u... alon SW 90th �.ventae. a�l`� 90th Avenue in the area of the Subject site has aPPrekimatelY S0 foot of -right of- way width and 24 feet of pavement but no sideWalh4 cU bs,, or storm HEAR NGS OFFICER SUS 91-0019 DAKOY! GROVES 2 PAGE 2 drains. The proposed subdivision's applicants' statement requests that the appithant not be requi7;ed to Install half street improvements along the SW 90th Avenue frontage ro nta g a if the site. The applicants request that the City soce p t a non-remonstrance agreement waiving the property owners rights to remonstrate against the future formation of a local improvement district formed to improve SW 90th Avenue. The applicants assert that due to existing development on adjacent properties, it is unlikely that street improvements be pl aced elsewhere on SW 90th Avenue in the foreseeable future. The subdivision proposes completion of the existing partial cul de sac bulb on SW 91st Court with a modified bulb design as illustrated on the Preliminary Plat. III APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS DS The standards for approval of a preliminary subdivision plat are listed at Code Section 18.160.060.A. The hearings avthority may grant variances to Community Development standards if Ke subdivision varianc© approval criteria of Code Section 181 ®lsOB a re sati sf ied. In addition, the proposal must also be found to be consistent V&th the development standards of the fcllcwi. 4 Code Chapters: Chapter 18.50 R- 4.5 tone); Chapter 18.88 (Solar Access Requirements); Chapter 18.92 (Density Computations); Chapter 18.150' (Tree Protection) and Chapter 18,..164 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) . Standarda of other y Development ti Pt may apply to subsequent development of theisubject Site, but are not apps. 3.cable to the current revi.e�w comp e�hensive Plan policies 2. �..1.,� 3.1.1, 3.4.2, 3.5.3, 3.5.4, 4.2.1, ... pp review this development proposal. e applicable to the rev 7.1.2# 7.3.1 7.4.4, itl. �. 1., and 8.143 als,, at of t:h pme p p IV. CITY DEPARTMENT OC, NENTS The lity of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal an offers! the following comments: Streets vewa� access �: g ° Y iFsroan SW 90th Avenue, hm><;fse r��cei.vee �°3 The three p opoSed lass ].otrc' are proposed to gain their 6tdeee from an dexteneion of 6t4 Otht Short cul de bay! SW 90th Ave is a local street with the following mi ninut • improvement standards: 50 feet Of right -of -way', 34 Poet et pavement, and curbs and . dot alke On both ;skies. Currently, �w 90th had approximately 24 feet Of pavement tiW th shallow o . ditches dh both sides of the toad t9ithin n',00 fot�t ria�ht: =of - taye The'. Ct��mmun t . i' evel . .. � ( � . ..:030) cegdi�'ed ;that y o nt Code Section _ ie. 11:84 development Shall wily occur if ad3aoent etreetd a> a ,irseproved to pity standards unities os oi.�'or �t condtit Fi whLbh HEARINGS OFFYCER '`- s06 91 0019 - DAKOTA GROVES 2 ;PAGE '3 c„ case, a non- remonstraance agreetaerlt may ' be granted. It IM our opinion' that the situation for this propooed development is consistent with the following condition, making deferral, of improvements to SW 90th along tht site's frontage in order: Section 18.1.64.030A. 1. c. iii Due, to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and the improvements associated with the project i self, provide a re under MO/Lew does not, by it significant improvement to street safety or capacity. Therefore, the ''applicant should be ree aired to execute a non -N, remonstrance agreem ent with the City for the improvements ov ements to SW W 90th Avenue instead of installing half Street. £ pg vem thin time. This agreement should apply to lot one only, SW 91st court is also a local Street thus um and those l,as3 the .same minimum improvement standards as SW 90th Avenue, as previously mentioned. SW 91st Court is not a through street any will ',terminate in a cul- de-sac. SW 91st Court 'Wag. installed as part of the Dakota Groves No. 1 ,subdivision. e y remaining . „f the road to be top The only xemainin �"`t ��' ,� , e applicant has installed is tale top half of the cul-de-sac. �,n asked for a variance to the current etandexdiri. The existing pertion of the cul-de-sac has a 53 foot right -of. -way radius' and a 45 foot curb radius; the applicant is meting for a reduction in the standard curb radiuie to 30 feet of right -of -way at ite minUm point. The applicant will install all uj iL ed improvements within the proposed right-of-Way. The Engineering Departai e�4t hs.a r ®ce i�� d Cements froze the Firel District and the city 'e 'Field Ope rati ons ,div3eiem� The /ire District has reviewed the modified cull. --d& -bean dearg.n and does not object to it, but the District is concerned with the driveway approaches in that they eaieet be able to handle the weight if heavy �.... , f 9 g that ec�ul,pmeni� Thereforaa the Fire Disc rant �.� re � eeta.sn that follOWing Conditi„onss be imposed on the applicant:: 1 • The apron° and cerbse of lets 2 and 4 shall be designed to withstand a mini:huma point load of X2 500 lbat this ise for dire /Rife seasfety equipment; and . »o parking soigne shall be in- Stalled in the c:al- de- -ran area. The Field Operations DLvidion ,ni},J , 11y haad sortie concerns about the atigioa]l nonce of the modVied Moatt dealing with cleaning of the street, and the opetatiofele Department as recommending that the variance request be denie:'ll Staff contacted the applicant to see if they would be willing is delay the hear3,4*— so that a Solution cotia.td be worised mute ary 29, r1992, the j din Janvi, .. .. , pp, ic, Mot �� g_ , d Op d the Eng .neerin Department artment met dime -, es the si' alt � otio the i aria] . g � concept wan modified to increase the curve line cn the inaide Of the m -de- Sac Bo that street itaiatetiaho cretle could get'si#taaiidagd cleaning equipmento do p.. g ,g . aupoti o the ,street �swe�a, a.n �� pair; a "�eecl HEARINGS c FPI4 ER - Su. . �" 0 91-0019 I2,h&COTA GRovES PAGE' 4 at the 'meeting that a mire um 22 foot radius curve should be required. Therefore, after review of the plans and additional nneet tngs, the modified cul- de•�sac should be approver, with the following condition s The c c shall minimum, 22 fd�ot radius .» -sa inside of the cul-de-sac on r Portion, ui.de curves on the the x;tx.on, that remains to be built. . Sanitary seer: The elieting single family house on the site is connected to the public sanitary '.ewer system. The applicant proposes to extend the existing public sanitary system and provide connections for the w t newly created lots to the extended bins. In the preliminary Plat, the applicant has shown a °clean out" at the end of the public line within the public right -of: -war. This does not meet city applicant be required to sit standards. shell b install a standard manhole at the Fl.. _... p. . line. terminus of the public Storm Drainage: At the pre - application meeting with the applicant, thy+ new EQC provided .\) g water quality ruling (see inforr�tioia ro�rided bel�o�a dealing with prat facilities was not dLscuseed beca se it WAS not yet in effects After receiving the application, the applicant's engtiseer leas been contacted and is aware of the new ruling and how it Will be adMinistereda he silty is required to comply with of new�reg�uirea�e of 1, 1991, �E � 4u g that all w add additional rv`Lous®service area, within, developments that ad P►e the Unified !/Mwerage Agency (USA) setvice area, Mdeit include an or site water guuali ty treatrent facility. Previously, , develop t tt without a suitable site far Water gualitytreatmen were allowed to pay a fee in lieu of on -site water quality treatment, with the fees to be u®ed to co atrul t regif lnal facilit a ®. Staff feels that the hew requs renneltat a inappropriate' rot many small developanenta, it is, not f eatable td build . 'an on -sit %a f acili a",onStru' . » it .. � Will Create ay. ctiofi� of numero�.�0ir eadall. facil�.ti,�s �' Main•t'enanc ... 118A: ilateVi er', rF ll�haV a t!o saber lst we moat require t. _,,• ce. �ffe��i�r� Uec r the otie�� and a hgaties Choi or be in violation of State regulatitine. .. � , .. not FXddu:e ®FY'Rd Abi �� i Staff the � �i We .7i{+li�� This Z osue Wail a w r expet hed the Leduc to be resolved h opeful: that the iaetie sail ; be resolved within new , tt ore, the sp liicant should. be required to this a 1m a water Tualit . aci,lit ° but +ke reco end that the ci' t °s install. a qu y �' Y r .., there :requirement if . Engineer be a1 .' LL � fie reslulation,. j ' boned to wairre are anevded. HEARINGS oFrIcgR -- sus 91 -Iioi9 SAE0TA GRovgs 2 MAY 1 The City of Tigard Field Operations Division has reviewed the proposal and provides the following Y comments have not been revised since the above meeting with the applicant's engineer and Engineering and Field Operations staff): 4. The design of the proposed Modified cul de Sac bulb will be diffics. It to sweep. The street sweepers that the City and the contract street sweeper own cannot negotiate 16 foot radius corners. There would always be some portion of the bulb that would remain unswept. Additionally, sweepers will ` not be able turn around in the bulb without stopping, picking up the brooms and power head, and backing up. This action will also result in debris' being left in the bulb as the brooms are raised. The street crew supervisor therefore refore recommends against granting the requested variance. However, if the variance is allowed, it should be the responsibility of the developer to notify all prospective property g this h City w31l not p rovide street sweeping serviesto this cul de sac. b. The utility plans show a proposed, sewer clean -out within the cul de sac bulb. Unified Sewerage Agency ` regulations prohibit permanent clean -outs within a paved street. The utility plans should be revised accordingly. The City of Tigard Eui.ldiag Division has reviewed the proposal and has no comments or objections. NPO ti AGENCY COMMENTS 1 The Tualatin Valley Fire and fescue District hasp reviewed the preliminary plat and has commented that the "lege"' of the modified turnaround g o provide a full 45 feet ofdrivin surface ac n ace len h in order hto provide adequate turnaround area for emergency vehicles. This could be accomplished through rolled curbs. Driving surfaces must be able to carry not less than 50,000 pounds grabs weight and 12,500 pounds point load. In addition, the turn around area should be posted for no parking. Fire hydrant locations should Tigard District and ld �e reviewed in coordination with the Ti and Water Fire Di etuict. 2. Tigard .. . .�.. p po sal �cSchool District 23J has reviewed the proposal and has n oted that the P Po . Lewis within the attendance areas of Phil Elementary School', Fowler Junior High School, and the Tigard Senior High school. The proposed development is projected to genereate the following additional enrollment at those school:: 2 students at Phil Lewis school; 1 l Student at �'ow3� ®�:` Jr high; and 1 student at �JL'�.gard High School. The School District that aiohsaoi. c:3�pacities3 are strict n�ites� �:, Lt of this propo®ed development and Projected be exceeded as a result . - , ...,: otherrecently reviewed and a, roved develo ntd within those atteindancC tkrette. TY;e biStrict noes that core facilities! of the schools are iir ;uf f icient to be able to consider po gable c1aeoroom additions, Additional school capacity way be provided by other option° under consideration byj the school diet tI_ , c�, , including: g el rode Lev tikA i d8 OFF r ... sf .... , 1CF� �- S[JEi dli: -�Q1� �- ,DAICt�TA ditOxit 2 PAGE 6 1• • reconfigurati oad, 'rescheduled, school year, boundary adjustments, double shifting, busing to under-utilized facilities, future bond measures leading to conetructioo of new "faA.litiees and other school housing options. NPGs 1 & 2, Northwest Natural Gad, PGE, GTE, the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission, and the Tualatin Valley Water D istrict have reviewed the proposal �d, have offered no comments or objections. EVALUATION OF REQUES'J! liance wig o units t gyel4 nt_Code 1. The proposed Eubdivieion complies with the u de standards of the R -4.5 zoning district b Acakwe the lots are ,Intended to be used for single fancily dotachedL dwelling units, sic permitted use in the z rue. In addition, thl proposed 8,500 to 18,057 057 square foot lots are all larger than the required 7,500 square foot minimum lot size of the zone and the average lot width standard of 50 feet. It i® assumed that these lots call, continue to Satisfy these standards after the layout id modified slightly to provide the Curls radian specified by the Engineering Department. The existing hedse on lot 1 would continue to conform to building setback sstandardaa of the 11. 4.5 zone. The reiimin . � : plat hetees P - �y p that the shed on proposed lot 2 Will be relocated It will be neceaaary 'that _tha shed be setback . at least 5 feet fro rear and Side yard property louse v 2 . chapter 18.88 solar ecea, arde for the e -fami .. ,residential lots ✓� prodid ®ass a ® stsn developraaent of new. sings y A, min3.inuaa of 80 percent of the ` propoilgd lots must meet solar access standards either through lot confi.gultatione, deaic nat on of prote(ted Solar building line setbackte other than standard building set oaks, of through performatide options relative to the actual conesttucti on Of ress idenced on the lets,. The applicant has snub ®itted a narrative and stuap addressing soar . - - � assts ®e ac ceSe considerations: ThOt applicant proposes that Protected solar building lines he recorded for lets 2 and 4 to ;be designated the umenta to be recorded with the plat. on thv.: final. plat ar lo hoc p.. g area would ..• .... ed within the The protected s�oYar b%ilai.srn :Linea e�ould be locos , and 31 feet north o€ recluirs�d rear yard setba�_� area for lot 2, the southern lot line of lot 44. Sufficient boil ding envelopes .......w p. . ... gaits the restrictions en be rova.ded f os these . bni.;Ld n lac ment that Would be created by the propo©ed protected se lotse es . sealer l�uildiaa' l mesa: t.. t with 9 T,tnese reiata�ictionss w ©nld lse ec�nasiia� era the protected solar building lot standards of ; Code sc stion 48.88.040.C42 �atLsf.. the molar p e o On (Code Section Lot 3 will. ® y . erf or��.�anc " 18.88.040 . d, 3 ) if deed restrict ions are itapbeed t� retittir0 that any house b,dilt on lot 3 have i p n long a £ within 30 degrees of .. . HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 91-0019 bA1OTA (ROVES PAOr 0 • w elej east-•est, P,') 80 percent of the house's south wall protected from shading, and 3) at least 32 percent of the 'home's dazing;, and at least 500 square feet of roof area facing within 30 dEgrees of east or west -c£ true south. The applicants intend to pluera these restrictions on lot 3. Lot 1, which 14o ld contain the existing house which fronts on SWW 90th Avenue, should be adjusted, out of the lots that need( to Meet solar access standards because the existing alignment of SW 90th Avenue would predetermine the lot's orientation, even, if the lot waa not already fully developed. Code Section ];8.88.4940 . E . 1. a (iii) permits this sort of adjustMent. The proposal therefore meets the ag1ar accesa recit$remont of Chapter 18.88. Vhe proposed subdivision c!ompiiee with the density standards of Chapter 18.92 because the 46,235 square £dot net developable area of the site (after deduction for right -off; -way dedication fOr SW 113th Court) yields an opportunity for silt dwelling units under the R.-4.5 zoning district donignation. Four sing le f amily residential lots are propesxed, including a lot to contain the . . existing house The minor Modifications to the P. lat that tall be nedessary minor change in the cul --de --sac bulb Should ttaf feet the allowed ntmber of finite. Chapter 18. 150 reg ices that the number Of tretto over Pik inches • in diameter that aro removed during the toured Of oonetruction 1 be Minimized. The proposed deveelopetent's exten> ion of SW 91st Court Will require the removal of at lea ®t five trees. It ApOeare that the remainder of the i trees on the site, except po seibl Y one tree on ].ot 2, would not need to be removed or disturbed doer „ g truction on � ;eo ed lot 2, 3; and 4. NO traze removal, tee Bite cone P Pc'� grading Should be allowed to occur prior° to Planing Division review and approval of a tree removal permit. Carte eknould be taken to protect the remaining true; during the eite improvement proCes0 including fencing the driplicaes of these treed to preVedit heavy nehiCie traffic or taaterial etockPiling irpadte upon the treed' toot ®. The proposed aubdivieion is Consistent with the tedffiliterientssi of Chapter ` 18,160 becauee e The oo u .. hies with the Comprehensive P P � he ro c,,Pec� s�iubdiv lion Plan Map', Coca Detta ty Residential designation's dehd ty oppoktunity for the site as Well as . with the applicable plan. policiea, the Stai"nt:lards of the 1--4.5 zone, and other applicable regilltitions= code section 18,160.0/0 sppecif fee that the prppsed name o: the subdivision co y the gei iremente of CRS Chapter In addition the name she '�� . , w ... e 1 with tl il; al.do not iae duidlentive o>" resemble the name of any other recorded subdiviSI,On i>ni Washington ecunty, Unless the land tai be platted to contiguous to and platted by the same party that ' platted iI8ARI JGS OFFICER -- SUB 91 -0019 -» DAitt ,' i ssR0► 7138 2 4 (I PALE S; • pi ni the. subdivision oritginaliy 'bearinc, the. name,,. or unless the applicant files 'and' records the .consent: of 'the, part: that recorded, the ` eubdivirAion origi4ally bearing that mire.; The proposed name of 'thi. subdivieiono Dakota "Groves 1\1) 1, is sic ii.are to the name of the' adjacent Dakota Groves subdivision any the current 'aPPlicanti' are ' not the developers of that subdivision. Therefore, the name of the subdivision moat be changed. prior to recording Qr ,the consent of the developer `of Dakota Groves eubdivision must be obtain for use of the name; c o SW 96th Aven € will continue to prov�i,de :. for adequate e and oPfe aOcess to lot 1. The exteneioat Of 8ta 910t Court will Provide . adequate and safe accent to lots 20 3, And 4. there, is no public need for thin street to he extended and therefore the proposed termination of this street is appropriate. • The proposed subdiviei n is consistent sist with the requirements of Chapter .8.164 because. t applicanta will be required to dedicate additional t -O fa way for and irlprove .the Sw 90th 2Wenuae frontage of • veyA,� Site to City street standards. • The applicante gill aloe he required to provido rie htrof via � for and im �v ©0 turn around a r ®e te»ina din g 5� 9' 1st Court. he a Plican t© have r q eted app.oval a variance to Crrnaanity Development Cede section 18. 1644 030. K r#hic& re guiree that cul de ` sac; streets to oinate .n a eitcula r to rn � � sores. 'the .a, licante havo ... , ec� :ice. around PP propos oblon' � g aha d turnaround are, Pe a Code Cection 18.160.090 . . � aaatheri.tee the heariage, atthcarY►ty to gmant variances to Code standards through IS; ie subdivision revieiw process. Secti.bn 18. 160.120 , proviO e ....o operable variance Criteria.' The applicants submitted . a rospa nee to the variance approval criteria :*s s p a. rt of the a pP licatt s ' stn e�eat staff a g gr ee that regueeted variance to allow a modified turn Around deOfign is jueti ied and offers the f0llevt, ng responses to ; the variance approval criteria: • ape dial t�ae of f eats timid parcel lendin g ay PP r , � the variance regileat is the 110 f®of Fo rth -South d i nsion of the pa eel relative to the location of the incc ntplete exiEtt ing o3.rco . turn, around. Oedaube of this ]united depth, a etal'hdard 58' font radius dui de ciao bulb in thie i.bod i on wounld' reduce the nerih. south dii ension bet seen ihe and the sovAtheriti tOOPerty li.are to approriau� =ut c1Ti 60 ,feet: Thin would be en inad equate area fob building envelope atd would I therefOte a regOlte that the WAio, portion C f the building ehiieiope fir at , 'diet let 3 he 'relocated, to the week i:ft a _ !,,cation HEAR�CfiidGS fiF °1C8R $tm 91 0019 �a t9TA C C . • o p, less desirable for solar acceseitbllity, or else would rs ; ,, '.re emitting proposed lot 3. AB ouch, the ee lance is necessary for the proper design: of the subdivieien at a density close to what has been contemplated by the Comprehensive Plan and /or with respect to the objoctivee of Plan Policy 9.1.3 which encourages energy conservation through appropy. +late develcpment design. ii Staff does not believe that the granting of the requested variance would be detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare or i ijiureou9 to the rights of ethers. Based upon the Fire District's comments, it appear; that ,emergency vehicle to this area access would not be negatively impacted by the modified turn around design. n. The further modifications to the turn around design recommended by the Engineering Department and Field Operations Division should allow the modified turn around to be adequately cleaned and otherwise maintained so as to avoid any other detriment to public purposes. staff cannot foresee any adverse impacts upon other property p ance is owners or the public if the veil granted. iii. The regUeeted variance is necessary to allow the property to be divided at the requested, and allowed, density. Denial of the variance could inhibit the property owners 'from attaining a similar return for this mount of re-4.5 zoned property ass owners of similarly sized and zoned properties th not be ait i1arly affected by p rior right-of-way dedication and road construction deciaieinea The requested variance could eli shat. the devaluation of the property through limiting the numbers or desirability of Iota that strict compliance with the turn around radius Standard could causes . The • proposed lots are consistent with Code standardsE street p dth ratio, minimum 25 feet of v�axx.r�um ��►.. de t�n��to wi Y g f x sate e, and other lot di.Mens3.onal standards compliance WLth eOmereheneii e _ Plan Po1.i 1. The edbdivition is consi ®tent with Poii'c 2.1.1. because notice Of . ` - .. n and the peb1ic hearing on t p� ' the a ��licata.o , . g.. � hie item wasE! r�ovlcled to the neighborhood :planning to owners cif p� . 4 . t.,... in the vicinity Of she Site. he1propo ed site had been proper � - y .. . podted with a sign noting that a land uss�3 or develop ►`^oast application on thta site was pending Sri order to compl Y with Policy 4.2.1, a condition ins warradted to require the appl ioant to develop 'an erosion dontrel plan ensuring compliance with erosion ddr4t1d1 dtabdatdd for the tualatin tivet Basin, as part, the gradiftg perrnit applications In addition, hgArtINd8 OFFIdth 608 91 0019 = b tOTA altottga 2 PAGE 10 i ' ' — -- r Rt LEGIBILITY STRIP `L a AMOMEMUMMWrie!O • a( condition is also warranted to require the devcloper to provide a water quality facility for stormwate from tb development as required by Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and USA rules, or to pay a fee in lieu of constructing such a facility if the EQC ulee will permit a fe,ie in lieu of facility development at the time of subdivision, dOvelopment. 3. This svibdivision propoVal complies with Polic 7.1.2, 7.3.1. and 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend rubllc aeWer and water elystems to this site and will provide for undetOtound installation of phone, electricity, and cable television lines. All necessary Public utilities are available at the site's northern border and can be extended to serve proposed let 2, 3, and 4. Lot 1 is already served by all neadary utilities from SW 90th. Service ptoviding agencies have not commented that capacity defiCiencies exist that would prevent the extension of service to the subdivision. There is no apparent nee/4 to extend utilities beyond the site. 4. The sUbdiviSich proPoSal complies with Policy 8.1./ and 8.1.3 because the proposed improvemento to SW 91st Court will be Crania isteht with City of Tigard standards, except for the recommended modified cut de ac bulb design. VI. CONCLUSION AND EZCOMMENDATION The Planning Division ' concludes that the proposed subdivisiOn, with modifications, will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injUrioUs to surrounding land used, provided that development that occura after this decision complies with applicable .odal state and federal laws: Staff recoMmend6 approval of Subdividion proposal SUB 91-.0019 and Variance VAR 9/-21 for the proposed Dakota droves No-II subdivision subject to the conditions which follow. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED OR COMPLETION SHALL BE FINANCIALLY ASSURE!) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUBDIVISION (Staff contact for all recommended conditions is dheig Davies Of the Engineering DehartMent, 63- 4171, unless otherwise noted) THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE LEQVIRED TO COMPLi WITa THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PaICA TO RECORDING OF THE PLAT WITH WASHINdT0N COLINTY: 1. a. The final Plat ebaa be limited to the creation of f6uk lts 11 lots shall be fully diaieneictied on the plat and nball be conSiStent with it-4,W, toning district d.l.m.i#nsiotial requirements, The final Pitit . shai,i ao5zipty with Oregeki jEtetrided statutes, Chapter ditv, of Tigard community BeVelordient Code Chapter 18.160; and tiashington County titaiadatdoi b. Protected sold building lines Shall, be created tbediugh deed restrictions for lot 2 and 4. beed teotitiotid4:,h than be HEIi4 OFirICER SUB 91-0019 - talik-OTA, 0.1BOVES 2 Wax: 11 1,3 I . 'WAN IIIIIIIKAMMINIMMIN.. 0 guarantee rer, i Tannin Divi iox� ion recorded for lot 3 s o as to arante clan lance with Co 18.88.040.0:3. serarp CONTACT', Jerry Of , g • The name of the subdivision must be changed prior to recording or the conser;tt of the developer of Dakota Groves subdivision must by obtained for use of that name in name of this proposed 0,a t; • The plat shall provide for the dedication of all necessary right- of-way for L app public streets within the subdivision; and City approval and provide • The applicant shall submit plans, obtai�� t financial assurance for the construction of he followilum public ';..mprovement a i. All public streets within the subdivibion as specified in the following conditions; ii. storm drainage ey©tem. "These fm royements shams e d constructed i n accorci e e�Oit® of Tiaard. The im rovements with the iealir s of _ the y shall be c o� ted, and aoce ed by th' itv Within the time frame spe mod ins ub .ic assurance contract. All existing buldin g a that w ould be located, such that setback. p g ., 1. €�d or violr�tione would occur upon srecordi�t of the plat must be r®,mov relocated prior to recording. Demolition pe sh ll be obtained. SWAM CONTACT: Brad Roast` Building Division (619-4171) developer shall install 'a Water quality ,citing facility The euladivieitaa� p r utiof and Order No. 91 -47 ail a prov �, �� and the requi.rE4msnt�. of �� ®eoZ The city adopted by the Unified Beverage* Pegency of Washington Co:anty. y y .. y the ttent allowed b Engineer ma wa�`•ae this requirement i yuo the ern and Bxaii�,e�c 8e g regulatione of thr:. Environmental Q o 1L t '�im�ctl.:s ©i Agency 4 the y ex3et at the' tie the Public Improvement plans are approved and int3talled P improvement, plane and profile �. Twwo � � D .. Sets Of detail ed be �tb�.i.c ��f�br preliminary review tee the conettudtion drawings shah. be submitt , r, Ertr ineCiting Department. Seven (7) Sete of itpproved drs`nait ge and one (l) itemit ed construction ceiwt estiaaate, all prepared b a Prc►.'essional. r shall be submitted pp o t {or final �e vier�� and a royal. � Rc?'f B ' these Engineer, the � 19�.v��.�io g . i do , any dr'atlint s quire improvements. j g plane are i:ai addition to etg relevant ^ to public and should only include Bhe An erosion control plan shall be provided the public i�ded a® part of the a oaiot, Control PlanS improvement da�awings. the plan shall conform to i�r Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1981. An agreement gated b... the applicants, r iid. by �► e meat shall be ���ec � y � �► anttt, on fore pa,��avi:d the city; which 14aivee rthe right of the ;enter of pproposed tot oppose or remonstrate again. a future local improvement district for►aed to improve a. W. 90thti Avenue. HEARINGS bri? CER aA SUB 9l '. -0b1 • ROVES 2 .1 �TA .u°- PAGE 1 r • , 0. T11.0 aprons and dnrba. a,f Lot 2 an 4 shal om. be designed to withstand` a point load Jof 12,500 lbs. f„��,j` �C' ci3.tt8, curves 'on the • The 0121-.46-eat . shall i,save, d,a a miniiiUm, 22 �� �lM inside of the Cul- .de tacac for that portion ;';hat remainii..tO be built. "No "parkin " signs t►'hal.1. be posted .in the CU I.--de-sac meeting the Fire 9: 9 '.tetrict requirements and City standards. ltd. A grading plan Shall be a miti,ted ehosaing the existing and ' proposed contours and typical finished ',e�.00r elq vatiollis on eadh lots 'including elevations ,at- 4 different corners of the floor plan tied to the top aaf p p curb elevations AS �` our � ix� rev en , , a shown �+ z� the public The e. licant e appointment re_o�`anatrnotion meeting �► � shall ,mad® an pp � for �o� aE�1er approval of the l,i 5 c hart the Pity, of T,�gard Engineabria�, �b The public improve ent ! p].is:. a but rir ,,ore star tng w9xic on the site. a pUc nt, the appl��.cant' a eni;.iineer and contractor Shall be required to p� atter,Ac this mooting prior to receivi ,, the approved pl.. �na� and perelit s. 12 . Tkne applicant shall to the Oity of V3.gard Engineering Department a utylar copy of the recorded aUbda:visi ';; plat. Pan • tree removal or gr .din:$ on this property must be appllcoved, 1 y the 1�p Planning Division through approval of a . tree rem.�val permit. and Le viii Y - Ppr'� Of and d $l be removed ,the grading TAU,. Trees over six inches in diameter :rlhall.l Only as necessary to Construct etlKeete, nti.lit�.ts, as�d rep ancA ,e. The H. app icent �rowtde for an arboriet �.. a� require tha�� the i to�revview the plans for grading and tree protectiin. _ or Th® sxbori. ®t the Planning Division may prescribe p rateGt3ve Mea kzre s toe . tree2 to retained on the site. Areas not covered b y etrttctucecI pe� o o Y va a enrfacee shall be re v® ct ee 006-Ole after completion of gradi►g. A copy of the tree removal p® ored grading plan shall be aveU,lable on-site during all tree remo1 a1 and grading activLies�. �a�TPaC'�`. �'er Offer, P1 ins i�i.�'isi ®na (639.4171). '� Ot i i 0VAL+ SNAL-L T° 1�,,' ,� r a�; VALID ONLY z� 'VIM prix �� ���� E��s�.� ,rasp , ac s DEC�cs .o��. ��i�.!��i�I� �IO�iT�� OF T F,I'�'$CT�Z�`' Wag d)F T &1 nfl/ i90 dak. gro2 iRI�i1GS ��F'1 Eft SUB gl- C�Qi'� bAI TA i�01 S fl FADE 1. •, U 0 -�i tTHGRt TANGEL _ Ifigttcl Iota k map. rapraaaa- tetiea tanpiiod'by the City of ii¢ sd atilitity Stogie— /Mc fnfora.tiea System CIS} sifteara. ;afar — mitten portrayad ;are may pe i.terrde4 to be used with edditianet N 0 g T A tagiricat cede interpretative date i at deter:daft by ta Bty I of 1.44". gad. { tCt! {12J2i4J1l} �-� �. nM Cora Iwo low mow op. ai Emi. arms dins Jew' • LEGIBILITY STRIP y y/ EgglagLmemiTIEs STREETS AND ACCESS: Section 18.164.030.X.: Cul -de - -P h A► cul -de -sac shall be ar short as possible and shall in no event be more than 400 feet long: a . All cul-de-sac shall terminate with a 1,.iroular tur- naround; and . the lciagth of the en/ -de -sac shall be measured along the centerline of the roadway from a near side of the intersec ting street to the farthest point of the oul de -sac. Proposed access to lots 2 through 4 is via S 1 W. 91st Court. Half a cul -de- sac terminus exists at the ..icuth end of 8.'W. 91st Cousct This project is requesting a variance from the Community Develop next Code to modAfy a standard 0%1(1 -de ac turnaroundm The Development Community Develo Code requires a cul- de -sad p � sac ton end t4)itl and a minimum 42 feet curb °' � t�- �afM�bT�ay radius and -� ° ' a minimum The ft « ri half cul den ►sac haS , a 53 foot right-Of-way -way radius. The e�st�.n� radius„ �° �. curb A modified cul -de � -sac is radius uested witch 45 toot �aap approximately `� 5 ,, i n suer, of the standard cud. -,de� sac . See the Variance request below o The owner proposes to execute an atgretWent to wave his rights to remonstrate against a future Local Imp;c•oveanent District to it- prove S . W m 90th Avenue as op ;)red to cony Lructing S . E 90th Avenue street improvements. Section A n 18.164.030.0. iii of the Cow pity Development Code allows a waiver when ° °Due tc the natu te Of ea iaititing developm j ., eat ® ad acex��t propertied it iii, unlikely that street ,proveme�nts would be extend ed in the force able future aed the ° improvetent asp th the `ro-. ect under Ye' : view doffs seep by itself, sooated �' p �I provide A significatit improvement t� a t,rcet safetyor capacity; o0 .° s .. : ; ° ... .. 9 (, note, .. therefore a waver' o r. �o,�1i � of S W 90th 1�v'e� Th�.s is the cona3a.t 9f g Improvement District ra. fiats to remonstrate a a�.nst a fs�ttusaa- T�oca is l'�qur.tgted. 4., • a tor' •a Str� mot. Cross Geer ons : 1. The cross - section of streets in inches shall not be less than the minimum m shoss in the followng table Leveling pe of Street S ubbase , Course Surface uxterial iZ r' Commercial - aud 4" Collectors 12" 3 " Local Streets a 0 sham. be placed on, all new construction truction roadways :o The �ina3. lift s hoM►e�rerr, a ®t prior to City final acceptance of the roadways before 90 percent of the structures in the new de�relop ent are initiation of p elapsed since �, i ®n :. � ya ®nt a s completed nsnlees three years have e P construction in the develo of the standards is r�aquested pursuant to place- . A clarification � '�h�,s� in nt of the final lift of asphalt can new construction. project requests the ability to place ace it's final lift of pavement a conjunction wlah 90% completion o f t he recently constructed "GroVes° subdivision directly this development. �his will create t he opportunity t o eliminate a "cold joint" on the final lift thus providing a ► improved pavement integritY. gelaitaKy Sewer: Sanitary ni.t �,r sos er will be extended into the site via S.W. 91st Court. Storm Drainage: Surface drainage wri l i be directed to S.W. 91st Court. Wa es Water is available to the site through S.W. 91st Court. Variance: nd variance A ,.._ is requested to modify. the narou turnaround provides u� e • M requite- ...1 d iue f.ftit ,•. radius. "Y'he: modified Fire Department _ .., • tion and co pli s with p traffic circulation plat for., ` around. See the preliminary nary p meats for a hammerhead turn geometries. The length of the cull d sac � ,� is lazes than 400 feet. • • N • . • 18 .160,120 C ,rl er 9;rant ana a.,,,,. Loam asst... p The Bearings Officer shall consider the application for A. variance at the same meeting at which it considerP the preliminary plat. • A variance may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied provided the Bearings C i f icar finds: 1. There are special circumstances or cons tions�t affecting the pro erty which are unusual and peculiar to the land p p as compared to other lands similarly situated; • The variance is necessary for th00 prop:: design or function of the subdivision. The subject property is 110 feet in depth. Completion of the ex- isting • 1 t -� � reduce the lot last depth ...- is nbui1dable a �s;3ta.n half cul-de-sac sac turnar®und radius would depth to less than 60 feet. 'This necessary t allow a Would ell-m iYAiate Lot 3. The variance i s design consistent with the neighborhood and zoning m 3. The granting of mtel to Th g - g the variance will not be detriens to safety, and wetfa.,..�., or inn the public health, � v ,, the rights: or; other owi e>ar? of pzoper�:y; and 4. The v ariano3 ib necessary for the preservation and en- joyment of a substantial property c3 h because of an extraordinary bard ahip hicwoud eight from strict compliance e w!a.th the regulations of this title. 90 -41; Ord. 89-06, Ord. 83-52). The modif ie... d cul-de-sac ul de sac tnrnar. ca nd i, s not detrimental ental to public safety nor injurious to t hO rights ' others. Completion of the modified cul-de-sac will improve current circulation and confor- mance to Fire Department standards for a hammerhead turnaround. Solar , Acce„ ss a lots 2 and 4 meet .. Solar ns (70 Proposed .. middle pro�,cortA d 8 ®t�r �.at�.lc��i. The s�ata feet between ddle of the south ) .. ...1..,., line f Ztlls w p ' hin the rear ya'i:d t back. Got,: 4 requires eeLi �.t. and the m�aa bu�,'tdit f o souther y pe pertu _ ,. Westerly the as, 9 feet t: line wbych �.s�i 31 � hloh. w oar building �l uZ�.�.,�.ng aa~� b line. In addition, hod 3 had a protects Lot 4. the perfct maa�c Thy . be Dot 3 complied with e Option., h0nde Is to b p f - - , . . ...: equil. a °,; .th oriented off A of aft cast west ax�ss and r � r at 'least . :seed s�o� � a the glass and 500 square feet of she roof area td be i An adjustment to the design standards is required on Lot 1. If the design standard is applied to Lot if cost would be incurred at least five , Percent more per lot. Existing road pattern a l .rating house and existing public right --off Ways prevent Lots l ' from being oriented for solar access. March 30, 1992 Mr. Randy Wooley City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 RE: Dakota Ridge Subdivision Dear Mr. Wooley: While reviewing the Dakota Ridg e subdivision street and utilities plan with Jerry Palmer- of Alpha Engineering,, 1 was alarmed to find that we are being asked to either bung` existing overhead utilities along the frontage of the one exis ug home fronting SW 90th Avenue or pay the city a fee of $3,025.00. The Dakota Ridge subdivision consists of four lots. A copy 'of the, p re-plat is attached your reference. Three of the lots for are accessed by a new cul-de-sac de -sac (SW 91st court) which we will be constructing as a part of the subdivision requirements. The fourth lot oncQmpasses the existing home. The home is accessed ".R. 90th Ave. Xt's existing water, by a driveway frontir . � i� a xact electrical ., telephone services are provided sanitary, t directly from utility systems located within SW 90th Ave. We sox g ht to develo p this property into three new lots accessed essed from 91st Court, whi le creating ase separate lot f xo existing home w� cn would continue to be accessed from 90th Avenue. , Durawag our review with the City staff, we Carefully evaluated the pp a • Y cul-de-sac i i o opportunities for a modified at the terminals of SW� � allow the maximization of the deve1opm n o of the remain remaining parcel, of property. This required diligent caf the Court which g parcel, y P. requirements department. C3.ty pursuit of a�� and all Possible re uiremen'ts with the �`ment. �m wer® operations and fire anarshall as well as y p. extremely g 1 ' ., ng houee� extremely concerned during this process that he e�+ca.R�` �. could remain on a new reduced parcel fading SW 90th Averiee without causing any unnecessary improvements to the services of the existing home. We di,iigen l� pursues identification r,;f our xeeponsibi :itie o g [.� a , gin , eerifl during the review recess with y .. g x�. from th. the � �t planning and en 'We even eu ,.: � . � ..... . s of � td avoid departments. en considered a partition the e . ro erties (3 3 lots) )in order . the balance of the p `rein r laced for e t. i. t or 0, et potential of an .., re uirements b im rov .... - . along �' existing frontage SW 0th Avenue. . , ewer �� on the d: eerin staff g contacts with the ��'�Lt. engineering � �"r�,'si��. on o1.1r Cont y 9` .. , : _.. . ..... ,�, the c�andition�dd ®f ,.�' z this process cal �e�wa.ew �,� t' ess as. val it our under d exiting home cou �' oe c�tand�.n that �hi� approval, our � t' x - emain intact, utilizing existing acobes and utility syi tma s. Was our understanding that we 'would only ,be ,required to � `, n a Waiver of Remonstrance for any ;future z iprove ue� kts that zap' occur a10 jg ,SCI 90th Avenue It was " our belief at that time, and still is our 1be b of toc aj that those improvements ,could be unrertakcen as Part 40f the LID, a; !d would' include the . a ro " riate ' utility ad uetments as ' we l ` apse p'P �„ the improvement to sTri 90th "Aven �e itself ". We were shockced and'. dis s ►pointed by the suggested ri quirement that we would need .. to provide under . ound utilities rtjong SW 90th at this t iNe 9 , 'phi's requirement Is unnecer+sary, , I is not tequIred to prova do ,adequate utility services, and it `can be a part oe the '„ ° orhood improveauent program at such time as are "``LTD , is �eaghb undertaken for SW 90th Avenue. We have dili ,ently', pursued a full undevti' ending of the equirements for the division this propo ty. we have gained a etnowlcdge of Your de'elopment 'requires ents through the processi of this �i noa� subdiv sus „on. To require the ur dergrounding of existing viably. ' serv'ices along the frontage of aneexisting homy ; 3 for which we are waiving our rights to remonOtra g a xy future improvements is not realists', nor has it been idoOti fied, during our diligent pursuit of 'thi ► subdivision approval. , >, We ,arrest Your intervention and review of this ease along with a. finding for relief of this reu u cement, we await your review and look forward to working together with you towards a' satisfactory conclusion of this problem. You can reach me at 626 4600 or ALATIN VALLEY Y F 44 RESCUE AND B7 AVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT • • s R 9701! • (5)3) 526.2469 • FAX 522538 4y55 S.i�, � Zinffith €3nve i'. ®,�, �� Q755 B�:�veaton, l7 M. .+.a... Jantary 15, 1992 Jerry Pa i Mier Alpha Frig ,,; veering ',600 S.W. Oak, Suite 230 Portland, Oregon 97223 Re: Preliminary Plat and Utility ty Pla n Dakota Groves No. 11 Dear Jerrj a' This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based oh the the Safety ... ( $C) 1988 editions of o , the �'�.re and Life Code (U BC), Fire and Life Safety Code (UMC) , Uniform Fire Code UFO and other local ordinances and regulations e Plans for the captioned project are acceptable by the fire district, conditional to the following items: I. Sidewalks where turnarounds have been indicated need to be ,-:onfA ructed to support required load of fire apparatus. City Of y Tigard Engineering Department will appboVe load ,�l. carrying capacities of these sidewalk areas. The sidewalks nee d to be designed to oarr 50,000 00® p AUnds gross oss weight and 12 , 5 00 pounds point load. 20 No Parking signs , sha 11 be installed in the cu '.de.° =sac g shall state: "NO ", "TOW area. N o parking sictras shr� pv�'1 PA�I{:�NC7 �" .. " LAN] ' , "ORS 98.810- 812'" . They :hall be ` e FIR. ground .,. AWAY ZONE", ,. ,.. hcx� than posted no closer tha i 4 feet to the round nor hig an 6 Sot above the ground and'. Shall be�pl,aced often enough to be cor..p icuous lY seen. UF'G 10.2. , (1) These s i ,rns \sha 11 bQ :00ttOd a t or a ea,ra.vewae areas as d./ or vehic. es can obstrt ctlemer e� .. : W trTnarou naneuverin d �,here ark • . - eq�irer� access ro�.dt�ay. WLt)Yln' the r " orkttr :' a,meke I etectoirs Save Lives, upon , completion of this prof pct and prior t0 .asking' f 4D r ba ii1ding" Permits for "construct &..rl,; this oft. ce shall be co�ntacte:-; , for a field incV c'ion to review 4.:oinpliance With fire code" requirement.;, . A. , final, letter will ' e issued to the Planning Department stating compliance with tire: code , can be of any further , , contact ire at ,526 -2502. fncerely,,, Rirchill Deputy Fire Marshal aerty Offer t. � • City of Tigard P3.,anrr ing ,Depa nt City r , ♦Y> 1r m�lD4 Randy Vtloollr rA,i.ty of Tigard Engineering `,)epartineft REQUEST: FOft COMMENTS To: DATE a December 33 1993. FROM? igard, Planning Department'' �A SU D/ y I �} y�$ .3y .../it a„ � IAN *`yy divide 1a„ „.... �tiyay p of a (NPO #2) �a A� i6.Cd: Yi1 tY�AC.LV.9��d.Ai7 �07 �.iL 4d�/i � 9 aiRA� r i® i� �Yli .rw ice. ..++i'' NPO ) y request for Subdivision Zappro p pp 48,943 Square feet into four ,lots between 8, 500 and 18,057 r.quare feet each. Also rqueatedd is; Vari,nntwe approval to allow a modified v:ul -d sara, • ) 32-4.5 g dingle ZONE: R -45 dte®idlential �► 4.5 nni�e�°�t,►oac�e► The •�.onin allows family detached reicent3a1 unite public ea ppa rt faci . ties, ve i v ential treatment homes, farming, na aacturt 4 tames, family day care, w �.are, ho Occupations, temporary use, Arad reside ltical fuel tanks among ot!�er uses. LOCATICNa 11375 SW 90th Avenue (WCT* S, 35D0, tax lot 2 1) AIQLICM3LIE REVIEW CulTERah: Conr!nuntiity Development Code Sections 18.50, 18.88, 28.92, 1.8 ,102, 18.108, 18.114, 3.e. 150, 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1 , 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.3. 1, 7.4.4, 8. 10, 9 : and 8.1.3. attached is th 8ite Pl an and applia nt ° e statement for y�au ad d Lew. Froaa information su lied b y various de ar ments and a g ei ie rom other informatioa: available to our, staff, a rep' A recomster..41at3.cm will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the p',copo ®al in the near ftture. If you W oh use the s ce rovided below or tack a e,araratter toare rn ,dour comments. pp � y y to c nt a�� this a licati.® f irou� a u 1e to ree nd b th yvve d . . pile se phone the staff oontacc , noted tow with your coMmen' ,a old confia your co ents in swriting ae econ as possible. If you have any eetionm vegardir g this atteW, contact the T3.2ard Plarnia g De p artmant PO H�s_23397, 3;y25 8� R al1 dly d . , Tigard, .Lr3 97223 u Fk =:iNE: X39. 4171.. `.EAVF CONTACT s , _... ale, i f er t'tLEASE CNNCck T E FOLLOWING 1TE ;'S THAT xW a We move reviewed the p opo,aal and, hav a j .� no O b ®ct3.mR to it. Please mntact o£` our caf f ce almmumommummum a ti cease ':Defer to the encloaed letter. Written Comments p mermoomerso ,— ,,,eerr Name of )Pere° commenting. r'errfrrs, ' /� N� Phon e uYK6ber: p 1YOIYIIAY ~ � .mow. IL b ►/ 3UUE91 -19 . B w Itu 0 • ►I 'III CITY OF TTGARr , OREGON ,r fer January 30 1992 C fi �� �C1 Jerry 3P Chris Davies, Development 'Review Engineer QAtb SUE 91 °0019 - SILER The applicant proposes to divide a pare el of approximately 48,943 A ' . �' ap�?roval to sc�ua1' � � into � four � � ac : � Variance r, feet into lots . Also requested ested i� ai allow modified cul de s Findin..'. s . Streets: The existing �.► 90th Ave , the he existn house has its ccess rom S.W. from lots are proposed to gain their access from S.W. 91st Cta S.W. 90th Ave is a local street with the follri ing Vtinimum standards: 50 f ee et of right-of-way; 34 fee:, of pavement, curbs ' sides. y :, 5. W 90th has amc3 s�,de�aa,J.�:s on both sides Currently:, ` , feet of pavement Seri ditches on both ap�r o��.r►atel�r ? � nt with off; sides of the road wi thin a 50 foot right-of-way. 'The Community Development Code (Section 18.164.030) regvlires that development , ' improved to City shall. only occur if a.`� scent streets are conditions exist, in standards, unless one or more of 6 condo: Case a non - remonstrance agreement may be g ranted. It is our opinion that the following condition doe Gfl.st for this development Section 18.164.030A.11c:(iii) Due to the nature of misting delelopment on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements wou "d be extended in the foreseeable future and the improvements asseciated with the project sunder review does not, by itself, ,or + 4 . � p ement to street safety or capacity. rat zn� �.nu �ovic�e a Significant be requited to + etecute a non Therefore the applicant should i � the eme ts to remonstrance agreement with the city for the Im rov �` n k oW 90th Ave: EI G1N 1 .IN pl , iT$ SUB 91= . 9 5 1, R • I r ffl S.W. 91st Ct. is also a local street and has the same minimum standards as S.W. 90th Ave., as previously mentioned- 91st S. T. Ct. is not a through street and will terminate in a cud de -sat . S.W. 9l st Ct was installed as, part of the Dakota. Groves No. I Subdivision. The only remaining part of the road to be installed is the top half of the cul- de-sac, and the applicant has asked for a variance to the current standards. The existing portion of the cul-de-sac has a 53 foot right -of- way radius and ai 'r on in the foot curb radius, the applicant is askin fora reducti a standard to 30 feet of right- -of- way at its minimum paint and will install all required improvements within the proposed right -of -way. The Engineering Department has received comments from the Fire ° Operations. The Fire District has reviewed District and Field the modified , ` � c � �� n that they but is cul-de-sac and does not object to it, concerned with the driveway approaches; , i y must be able to handle the heavy equipment Therefore the Fire District is requesting that the following conditions be impose. the d on the applicant 1. The aprons and curbs of lots 2 and 4 shall be i desgned to withstand a minimum point load of 12, 50)lbs this is for fire /life safety equipment and No pa sac as ti signs shall be installed in the cul -d The Field Operations Department initially had some concerns, y dealing street, about the original .� deal�.n With eteaning of the st. � , mont) -de sac and were recommending that p . - concept they nce t df the modified cul °d applicant to see be T . n � if t ed the it bd be �railli�� Staff Contact hearing so that a solution could would g to delay ay the g worked out.., On �;1'E�,�nuaiy 29. 1992, the applicant, the be b engineer, Operations and the he Eng 1�.�ants Field Department met to discuss the situation. The original concept was modified to increase the curve line on the inside of the - that aintenance crews cOUld get standard cleaningae u so to d sweeping. It was agreed � do the street swee in e at the meeting q t .. ► of a 22' radius curve would be '.hat after minimum of the rve �� required. Therefore a plans and additional meetings, the modified cul -de - -sac should be approved with the following condition a The cUl -de -sac Shall have, as a minimum, 220 radius - m:� curves on the inside of the cul-de-sac on t he portion that remains to be built 40.0.1. SERI C COI NTS SUE. 91-=x. P, r. L J • 2„ Sanitary Sewer: There is a existing single family house that is currentl� Y situated on the Site and it is connected to the public sanitary sewer system. The applicant proposes to extend the existing public sanitary sewer system ".located in S.W. 91st Ct. and provide connections for the newly created lots" to the extended line. In the preliminary plat, the applicant has shown a "clean out" at the end of the public line within the public right-of-way; this does not meet city standards; therefore the applicant shall be required to install a standard manhole at, the terminus of the public line. 3 . Storm Drainage: At the pre-application. a , applicant the new EQC ata,�an meeti� with the ruling (see information provided below) dealing with water quality facilities was not implemented. After receiving the application, the app licant' s engines�r has been contacted and is la. aware of the new ruling and how it will be administered. to comply with a requiring that all new Effective December 1, 1991, we are required new requirement of the EQC The EQC ar s qu . � � � developments, that add . additional impervious. service area, p ' within the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) must L clu e a water quality treatment facility . Pr eviousl y, developments withou a suitable site for water quality treatment were dl to pay a fee in lieu of on-site water quality treatment, with fees to be used to construct regional facilities. We feel that the new requirement is inappropriate. p�u a dFor many small developments, it is not feasible to a n on -Site faci',ity. . Construction of numerous . small facil. es wil facilities will create maintenance problems for the cities and USA. , Effective December 1St, e must require the we have no choice. .� facilities ,or be in violation of State regu This issue was not addressed in our earlier staff reports, as we expected the issue to be resolved hetVeen USA and the EQe We are still hopeful that theissv Al ' will be resolved within the next three months. .. efore, the appl,i r,an.t should be required to install a water qualit facility) but allowed ,, ..c �� that the to waive this requiremen ,�e reomme City Engineer be allowed t if the regulations are amended. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: SUB 91a 19 SYL:R • Recommendations: ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SAT I M' IED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO TtECORDING . THE FINAL PLAT WIT WASHINGTON COUNTY: l.. The applicant shall install a water quality facility meet• ng the requirements of Resolution and order No.. 91-47 as approvd and adopted bby the ` Unified Sewerage Agency Of Washingt► ;►n County. The City Engineer may waive this requi cement to tae b by regulations the Environmental .Quality extent allowed b -the re ulatian"s �f Commission and Unified Sewerage Agency as they exist at the time the Public Improvement plans are approved and installed. . Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings ` shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (iQOTE t these plans are in addition to any, drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public m p roves ents S . An evosion control plan shall be provided as i1part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall coi;gform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance I andbool1'4 November 1989.0 An agree_ ment shall be executed by th s p licant, on forms a - , a� s right p by City, onu the " relimir property plat) t: o, o o provided b the Czt , whiC� r�aivcs tht' ro er owner's re ht (Lot 1 only as presented A remonstrate against a Future Local impr Dvetemt District formed .,.. to improve S.W. 90th Ave. • The aprons and curbs of lots 2 ` and 4 shall be designed to withstand a point load of 12,5001):,s. 6. The cu c shall have, as a rainimum, 221 radius curves on the inside of the cul- de-sac for that portion that remains to be built posted in the cup-de -sac meeting • ° °No Pvj�arking "" signs ,shall by p w the Fire District requiremehnts and City Standards. ▪ A grading plan shall be submitted showing existing and x�. s s typical finished floor ievat' o.. s on each proposed Con:to ors and typ ` lot, including elevations ` rent corners of the floor at4dffo p tied g shown on the public plan lied to the top of curb elevations as improvement plans ENOIN)ERI.: '" �, NG CO1!+NTS: "TJE 91°19 SILER • L I rs. ▪ The applicant shall make an ,appointment for a pre -eohstru4 t :orr meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Dep artment after approval of the public imPtOvement Plans , but befogs starting, � work i,� *i the site. .. The applicant, the applicant's enc�i.neer " ar�,d, contractor shall be required to attend this meeting prior to recei's/ing the approved 'Plans and permits 10. applicant - shall submLt to the rlty of Tigard Engineering The Department a mYlar copy of the Recorded Subdivision Plat. O� THE �a���oGaz�'� SECTIONS e.,rr� xN A,i�I�ITIOI� THE 'APPLICANT CANT SHOULD BE ATiJE � � .� �E LIST. OF THE CoMMUNITX DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE 1, SECTION 18.16 0.17 0 Improvement Agreement Before City approval is certiited on the final plat, and re approved the befo � constructo� plans are issued by City, the SUbdivideZ. shall 1 d, Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer sPocifying the period within which _ all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and • Include in the agreement provisiOns that if such work is not completed within the period specified the Cite may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from th e subdivider. . feet and im ovd ment f to als B, The agreement shall. stipulate tmpr ,� _ may be .ret;�a.re paid and o d rn tion o th r improvements deposits as �.nt .� rov�rte f of the construe pee :f o p and for the eXtension of ` time, Fancier S Stages conditions therein stated in the contract a ▪ SECTION 18,160.180 Bond e At required by Seo iot i8.160,170,' the subdivider shall file th t ie agreiement an assurance of perfor manoe su orted :�y one of the col �J pp ovaan 1. An irrevocable letter of credit exec,ated by financial institution authorized to transadt business ins the States of oreilon; a suret eo paa y suret��► bond' e�ec�ated )::),t y authorizer to transact .business it ,e the State f. e o ; : i A , � .. z 1i the surr..ety Ore on u�nsch tema�ns in force un�a..� corpariy is notified" by' the City in 'writl.,ng tha t may be terminated; ar . Cash, FINGINggAING COMAtNTS: Si1E 51-'1 SUER ti The subdivider sh �' furnish to the C ,ty Engiy ee ' �a�..;; ... itemized improvement eStin h.te, Certified by a reg .stereo civil ` engineer, to assist the City Engineer i calculating . the amount of the performance , assurance. The subdivider shall not cause termination of nor allow expiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City. a ithi i 60 applicant a i 'nat'ure s 92. days of the City review and approval, the shall submit the final plat to the :;County for of County officials as required by ORS Chapter, • Upon final recording with the County, t s omit to the City a mylar copy of t plat. ▪ SECTION 1.8.:62.080 k "±n&.l Plat Application Stbn ission Requirements 'A. Three copies of the partI tion plat prepares by a land n u . . - and. surveyor or engineer �.�.cen�.�ed �.o practice in Cr;.ox�, aai necessary' data or narrative The partition plat an d data or narrative shall be dt awn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92,05)f Washi.hgton County, and by the 'City. of Tigard. SECTION 18.162.110 Centerline Requirements A. Centerline N4onumentatior for all Major PartitionS i 1. The centerlines of all street and roadda r :+girte way shall he monun'terted as proscribed in ORS 92.0 60 (2 ) before City acceptance of street inproVements the following Specifications: ixnder . Centerline monuMents are ret fired .t�► have for City s� set. �111f7n ia�nent boxes coniorzni rig to City ��� �tani�ard for those monuments ri.thin the Pavement nt 'area; and The t4 s o al ni n i ent hi es sha .: be sel • fin shed p tent grade ' •MOINEER71NC COI N'TS a'. Utilitie`� .ill �Y►t�.i.ty. ' lines includingr b ut no . iii ited to those required for ,electric, co Unications -; lighting and cable television services and related facilities shad. be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connecti'on boxes and meter cabinets, whic11 may be placed above during ground, temporary Utility service ,�aci�.ities' 1 r� construction, high capacity' el6ctric lines operating 50,000 itiolts or above. ■ .164.130 Cash or 13ond Required 11 impto7ements `instal . d by the stabdivider shati be guaranteed ' as to workmanship and, : *at• er�..a1 for a period of one year fCSl10 'in+ ac ,eptance by the City. ▪ Such, guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City tngineOry The Cash or bond shall, comply with e ' terms ara conditions of Section 18.160'.1'80 • 18.164.150 Installation: Prerequisite/Perniit Fee 1 • No laird division irapravemer t'ss incl,idirig sanitary servers, storm sewers, streets,, sides4alks, curbs, lighting or other recai.remente shall be undertaken except after, the plans therefor have; beet ap` i.o ec by the City, permit fee pa it and permit iS d. • 18.1 04.180. �Toti��e to : "iyeti� ref • Work shall riot ';oe.gii" uriO. l the City has be ;n notified in advance. for air., reason a:t shall not' e O � • If word is discontinued be resumed until the dity is notified. 1 �7ClN lf�7CN dO 1 O a$.. 164 .200 Er inC��r. .'• ,J.,r'r '.. Ce t f.icG71Ji\fi� .Requi�J.t?e6 The land'"d :uid r.' c o.ineer . shal1 p hide wr : tr n .ert i.f icat, :on off" a fo± i prr tided. by �. e, .City th,a�t. all ! improvements, we r marsh .p. and ter .alla, arc �.t accord,,, with currenit and ‘fstancdard, ei gineer no, and constructi.bn pr ctice.s, and are of high grade for the City , accepti, ace of, ,the stxb�aivis ion' imprcveirmenis pjf. any portion thereof ;for, 9 rat ion, and,, maintenance AP RO' S . Randall R. Woole Citvy Engineer [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] PROPOSED ; ,SUBDXVISION ' OO19 OWhYER, �;IG SjLRR, IS 'A:431 �IN a Ifl�! THIS �Sifplli'V`xa IfIN. TtDF .�8R1i�EL1C�FRR- lACH (914021) To , ' R ' 'curt.-DS-SAC IN ORCER . TO V 3 'S DEVELOP,' IF 'rural, 1 ,. ILL NC NIDI'i ABLE �iF��° -a ���� sT: Q DE-SAC. THE `' �iit'FFPENS ' THAT THE i:�l'Y'I!�,R11� C:t�I91�' . +"'' S . �9�.t J 6' RADIUS 'CORNRRSg. THEREFORE IF THIS FARAIANCE /gclazOvilvo EE THAT STIPULATED IN ,'WRITTING TO THE 'DEVELOPER-OWNER A1ND Pl.. PROPERTY OWNERS THE 'CITY OP TIG H WILL' Nom' FoRPORH SWEEPING' ES TO L DE SACd. IT IS, NY NECC9BZNOATION THAT TR0'44RIANCE NOT BE ALLOWED, ANY VEHICLE LARGER' TRAM A Cc ACT iILL NOT SR ABLE' P: ,AKE A U,TURN' IN TIE ', CUL -DE -PAC AS IT IS' BEING PROPOSE i„,, WITH TH3 S> ?REPEIE NOT BEING ABLE SW R. PHRUGH HE CU L- DR-BAC &V :tXNR 'T STttEBV IS SWEPT EB WILL TO-SWEEP �T O OP DEBRIS LBPT WHERE T . SPRR STOPS TO PICA. OP THE, ERQD NS AND ,ELEVATOR /PAR BEAD TO TURN AROUND BOB WHITE TUALATIN 'VALLEY riiEUE 8 RESCUE AND B3EAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMEINIT 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive • PD. Box 4755 ", ieaOston, OR 97076 • (503) 57,6 -?4459 6 FAX 526-2538 Jerry Palmer Alpha Engineering 9600 S.W. Oak, Suite 230 Portland, Oregon 97223 Re: Preliminary innar v ri• lat and Utility Plan Dakota Groves No. II Dear Terry a y i d"' brs'adonthe Thai,e is a Fire and Lzfe�.fet F�.an Review and .� 19�8� ec�ta.�n5 of ��he 1014C )-#. U'r:ito�m� Fare Code McOhan� Cal Fire and Life a v (U'FC� , and other local ordinances andl regulations la ms f o�" t 1e ab Ve oa t toned ry ect are aC P p � p_ ? � cep�klbl� by the • . , d r e following .teams fire d�.strx;ot, conditional �a� trn � r 1. idewa lks where: turnaroun .. aced need t Die st required load of -fire app ►rates •a ConstruCtec t® u gp or , � . y g. d ;. a approve .oad Gat of T� ax`d Din �neeran 1� g p ar as The. • Carr Sri oa acitiea of these �►xdewa sidewalks need to be designer to Cadt,.y •50, 000 p o$ds e •weight and 24500 ounds point loa • No arkin s ns shall .be ins ie{+ .... rn p.: L ; ea . Igo park�.rig s �.gt�s shall. st ,AWAY Zi ©��'i�' � �� FllftF �AI�1E ; r C?�2S '9 •� : ^ :`, � . � uan not h 1• her than posted no ,Closer traunc� an���hallhbe rluoer+�, oftea�, ek�.augh tof eet aho�e the g � a eons aiduoiisl. • seen. UFC 10.207 ( j f r • . ` nea C' where the gars .shall die looa�ec� at �r turnaro�n k drivewa areas and %ors: o�astrUet ewner a °► y ...:.. • �.d a tEn�clestcar er s3d� wal � �v�h�o�.e . _ . ... where pa maheuver ng within the r a uir dway q ed acok:ss roa "Wer L !B/ Smoke Detected Save Laval;' 1 Upon c! pletion of ,this Project + lid Prior for- , ib1.1i1ditiaq p ";wits for constkUcti On',- this o fic e i a; .be ca tatted for 4 field ihsp+ ct ?n to r ■ww,iew �; ► ? i nco. . fire cods re ij Asnits I. final lette the Pianning Depa7 :tiDent statingompliance.' wit a or e. regiiiren en s can b: . of any further assistarice to yot ee . free.. cnnta+ct 3 e at 526 - 2502,. 13 "kw ee3fy Offer City of Tigard Planning DepartMent Candy Tirooiy of Tigard Engineering ®0a ar'' me? t • �� .. 'W _ _iJl d. 'Y+ 4 4Dfle d t . _ _ • 'b ..n .1 we �: • V. 1 ? t 5'y • NEIGHBORli3On PLANNING ORGANIZATION DEvELopARNIT REVIEW CHECKLIST s PG 2 R..quest Zan,e ; ' Lo cat Location: Applicant refin e ts Subdivision approval l to divide a Patcel of appro ximately 48, 943 square feet into fo,.w lots between 8,500 and i8057 square feet ; each i, Also requested is Variance approval to allow a modified c *l -d1'. -sac. ZONg:4 R- (Residential, 4.5 units per acre) LOCATIGNt 11379 SW 90th Avenue (WCTM 1: 1 35DB, tax lot 2601) e , revie+ the attached, development prop sal and comment . on n�mea�t those`riteMs listed below which concern (s) this !PO regarding this , ThiS :.sting is a template ' to aid in you~ review of ax��;�bc a�.�. ©n . this proposal. Please let t us ono how You feel about this deve1oPm ent taking place in your portion of the city. Thank Yon. Access To and From Site Traffic Impact-. Neighborhood Impact Et wii Oxamental Impact ._._„,,NL,rc2_e242ttgczey2eLL__ey._LAz:' 40- _. . '...:wr ,. .._: %: Yew. n.'..,... ....tid.rrwYti..r ✓Sw.+n:.i:.ii Signed o i�.�Jly�. ;`- .mot' -...►; " 10 rr.L...�u�...�Jri+�. Date: Tot "RECEIVED'' PLANNING REQuEVE FOP comMENTs JAN 1'0 192 7 DATE: anember 30 1991 . ,..._ P OM , Tigard Panning Department s i10i9IV11,31 sH1A 81-0019 - . . (NPO #2) l request for Subdivision approval to 'divide a parcel of a pprd►btinnateiy 48,943 'square feet tntca four loin between 8,500 and 180057 ga/uare feet each. Also re R eaten is Variance a roval to allow $ Mod Modified cul-de-sac. ZONE: 2 4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre) The t -� zeorting single family detached residential units support facilities. residential treatment homes, , f,;. s ming, manufaCtured hie, faa ini :y day care, hone occupations, temporai"yt�'D avenue residential tanks taaae®. LOCATION: 11375 SW 90th ( APPLICABLE EVIEW URTTERTA: Muni' :y Development code Sect, :ens 18.50, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 1801 '30, 28.160, and /8.164; cotoprehen>eivo Man Policies 2.141, 4.2.1, 7.1.2 0 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 7.4:4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. information supplied by varciotse depart me a nant nC your and fro . tier Attacked is the Bite Plan anal epp lira h e flea ins a�g neiee autn�� dray. Other information available ion will be prepared a�i► �, a report arid rr�onda and a decia ;on Will be rendered qu t'4 proposal in the hear future. If you wish to comment on this application, w0 need your coranteritta by Jaen 9r 1992. You m'r.ty Use the spa t= provided below or a ttrith a separate fetter to raturit your catiarnenits. I nat .0 tO reepon 1 by tl; a above date please phone the staff contact noted below with ur@ ary ri idea Mira ycaur coca ti,Atei n writing as soon as possible. If y" y 4u nol a regarding this Matter, contact the Tigard w xt�� your cQmnn @rate a Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 8W , Hall B1Vd. , Tigaed, CR 97223. PRONEr 639 -4171. S'TAPP CONTACT: .;err, offear, , PLEASE CHECK 'RIM FoL WING ITEMS THAT luPPloti We have reviewed the paaoponal and have rib Objectiona to it. of our rb° office. Please Please contact t3G� P1ea ®e refer to the as3raclbeed letters %Written Commentso OAtie 'eraon Obmmenti tiumbei ■ bibs /su89 1.= 19 :'83E t 7 4■ • Tigard-Tualatin _.gni District 23J Larry Hibbard AolministraVon Center 13137 S.W Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tel., (503) 626 •Y620 Pax (503) 634 -2296 -/ i �n response to yep'' re pest for iretirtilMetta on the development cep Dakota Grove's II ( 19) lamed off 9,t ,, south of Dakote Strom, the ached le NbMiti6d 68 a lelatement of impacts ......... cerelyi THiaRD— TURLRTIN SCHOOL : NC %TRItT 23J CO V C UNTV, RES DENTORL. IPIPOCT STNTE ENT Doveopment: Dakota Groves Two Data 1/7/92 Number of Units. Single-- Family Multi -= Fifiraily $went impact of impact of Adjusted SCheoi Actual Available Prior Approvadj this Capacity Rsquiremant Enratiment Ca ae� � e�l aon�s red , � nt (Sum al al columns e 4 &5' Elementary 500 46.1 39 18 481 Phil Elementary intermediate 900 995 -95 206 1 1202 (FwAtIer Jr. Kigh ) ' gh School 1465 1700 --23 187 1883 Tigard Src, High-,- tatus,of School impect Fe- explanation of columns l through. 6s see coda o rl back sheet. Sr.Lzol( capacity not exceeded (column 6 less thancoiumn E Sthool(s) capacity ex --c ore facilities are sufficient to. consider portable additions Sufficiency rt determined fined by requ ranents of Uniform Building Code $nd or City County wdes. School( city exceeded--cerefwilitiesinsufficientto consider portable additions. Additional d a ity may be prcr idad bv other options under consideratenlw the &Ihool District which include: Ft& level reconfiguration, resct=aduled scut year, b u dart' adjustments, double shifti busing taw-ter-al-tint - Taciiitir ? future bond measures = leading to new construction :, and ot r housin4op for �t opti€s and statements have been prepared by. Tigard-Tualatin School District Administration ate a nd apprc4'ed by the` Boerd=of Directors Thfs: school: impact sta ernent is for the- above indicated developnient, and is valid fort 120. Signed idd Hi;11er� Director of Operations and Transportation (684 -2221 '4. • _ • j-1. LEG B L STRIP- STATEMEN1 CODE Column 1 School capacity reflects the number of classrooms, portables on site and Special Education program accomodations at an individual dividual school. Column. 2 Actual current :school enrollment- kindergarsten has been computed at one -half. Col: mn 3 Current available capacity- difference of column 1 and column Impact of previously approvers deve4 tints determined by School District housing formula :see School District Housing Formula: sh,wn below) Column 5 Impact of requested development Determined by School District housing fcrrtu_ld. Column 4 Column 6 Adiusted school capacity requirement determined the sum of columns 2,4 and 5 .- and places developmental request in A, 13 or C category. itEamr.fflualtubs. ahasildekkagniew 0.48 pre °first rade: children per dwelling 0.32 Elementary students per dwelling 0.14 I ntermediete stints per dwelling 0..07 High school students or del ling. 0.53 To% school age = students per dwelling .07 Elementary stud-ants per dwelling Intermediate: students per dwelling: C.0 High sc .hoot students per dwelling 0..1 3tal. slhtm1 strdents per dwelling; H FS 6N CAP6Cat Tigard High School T ualati n thigh school Fowler Junior High Twality Junior High Hazelbrook Middle Sch. CFT Elem. Mary Woodward Elm. DurIwo Elea-. Templeton pleton Metzger Eenn._' Phil Lewis. Elem. Byrom Elem. Tualatin Elem. Bridgeport Elem. TOTAL 1465 1465 900 900 8-90: 570 600 375 51; 0 550 500 600 600 600 6110 AS OF 12/20/91 'I 70C UNDER CONSTRUCTION 995 1052 UNDER CONSTRUCT IC 510 737 384 603 513 461 649 63 761 x996 (so TbLALATL 411.. ---- � - I 920 :..., .. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NTS DATE: . De1ceim►%er 3Q,; 3;9'__� ._,. J "4"0"4199 :01 6 1992 RECEIVED, PLA[ IiIliG FROM Tigard Planning Department RE: SUBDIVISION SUB 91 © ®19 V7� il9i+1 VR&. 9 �O02 1. '1 slit (NPO 41',) A ate to, S, a ®Q and 318, hD57 square tal+y M k roxi m .i feet � a request for Subdivi8ion �► royal divide a parcel of app 48,943 square feet .rote. four �, each. Also requested io Variance approval to allow a modified on1- »de-sac. (Residential., 4.5 units /acre) The R -4.5 zonif g family reaidentia1 units, p u a support rt facilities, resident ial treatment homes, farming, m nu f actarrd h e� e, h occupations, temporary use, and residctntial fuel tanks among oth er beE�. ,TIC,a: 11375 SW 90th Avenue (WCTli 181 351DB, tap lot 601) APPLI 'GRp ; VRWCRI �tl Community Development Code Sections 18.50 6 18.88, 18- 42, 18.102, 18.108 18.114, 18.150, 18,160, and 18. 164; Comprehensive Plan Polic.lios 2.3..1, 4.2.11 7.1. , .`i :,.. 7.34.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. . he Site 'Pan and applicant ° e atat orient for your review. Fri ,htt�ie,;hQSi �.�; � - its and aq+enci. ®a4 sa�ei fry other inforz(atio►a supplied by variou® departrine and reconm endatiOn will prepared'' is�foraiaa��kx.e�n available to ®a��y staff, a report If you wield and a deoiaion 0� .11 rendered on the prep�aeal in the near ture.� you May attach a Separate 3,etter to return 2 below or a ] your e~>rxt @. ark comment on thin a lication, We need your comment€ by Java. . eaea the epace provided ____ ,,, . -- the o e tour co ntph in t costa Ct �;'�... �. �'�® nd.,;� date_ t,, genet) v�iri�tineje� l i ou ire um lah to matter,' , e eoori a i pei'�eei E e1o�if youyhavea0 ny gi,:ection®oregard�ing thin mater,' co � 9' 223 a PHONE:. J4 PPlanningppe urtMent, PO B0 23397, 131125' SW 'vda11 Blvd., Tigard!, 639-4171. STAFF' CONTACT:. ...■ PI.11ASE COCK TSB FOXING ITEMS iliTAT APPL!' r have n� `i jeCtione to it. We have revietred the proposal sand Please contact cat onr office. Please rater to the enclosed letter. Written Comments,: .. .. ,._.� �::::�.......,...;..:.P...'_ -ice" - roe mama tAr. or ;_.,.:.:.ter... :rte :d i.wril nn+ moms of Peron CoMnennt i ag: Phone Number: bkm/ UB41- 4.8kM 3. • Nri. .w'iea -vii re- tO 0).1/41.3c. REQUEST FOR C0HM t4 S >»..t „ DATE* DOcau ber 30 1901 F'.dits Tigard ;Planning Department r vot for Subdivision y approval o divide -aU2 parcel i � Z approximately- 48,943 y REM �I �s FBI ' �/ bO�1 �W- ( ) square feet into f*,- lots between 8,500 d 18,057 sare fe each. Also requested is Vw iasnce ariprovaL to allow a modified cut -de - sac. ZONE: R -4.5 (Residentiai,n 445 units/acre) The R -4.5 coning allows single family 4'etached reef con ial unttaa public eu,* ort facilities, rlieidsantial treatmeret. homes, , farming, matudsoture4 hca►ea, family day care, hem occupations, temporally 1*ae, and residential ;fuel 4ailltri aeong other +eVeae LOCATION: 11375 90th Avenue (W1 181 3508, ' tate lot 2601) APPLICABLE 1 18.108, 1 Community 18: 1S-3, 18..160 as 18.164; 1 r :; henaive �Plasn REVIEW CRITERIA: 18.88, • Policiese 2.1.1, 2+ �/ 11 2�j 2 �y ,u, 7 w w y �p a �./.��� 7.1.2, �r�l, .Dra.7.1, 0���LS'Qr �i.f.+e.L, �i�� 1�.1s3u th Aistdl Plan and applicant ° sas statistic* for your r ie W. boon information ati iie r by veer Touts departments and agesnci en Gina fry other Attached i nfOrcation available to our staff, a report end reccimendation will, be prepared , need in s the by Ja , future. 1102. you You may tw�cr�tn ®sn thie a��iicati. we rhn r utfse the space provided below or atta+ rn a separate ate letter to return your cement*. -aacr� uazakslss t® rez x�d . birl t%s abovea3 a t. please phony the staff contact noted lbe1OW with 'Xoue commtnts and Confirm your cortmec►ta cn +s-aritfng as soon as ��ing Department, �8 �3o�s: 232617, 1121a,�aa�'ding this utter', +xonta��t the Tigard sssssable. If you have any eetioae r W Hall Blvd., TL Ird, OR 97223. $ 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Offer'.. PlizAtz CH$CK, TSB FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY Wa hive tOldWdd thsst propo sal and Rave no' objec1a6ne to oft. Plda*1i contacct ..... of our P10aa refer to the encleded .utter. Written, tOeMentet iiimoNoMmtlouslam A t CO Name of Person Commenting: NJ Phon. N1er s b /SUB91. -,i,9 - ®cM' lu�•e.R�/41.t 7F'l I�Xy�r � " 4d1,(651+Mw111:Vi�1"1 " ilfi'�6Ah ab..�..aal�c•�� i4� a bI �• • � a to TO: RECEIVED PLANNING JAN 0 7 1992 REQUEST .FOR ' COMMENTS DATE: D 30 199 � 'FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SUDDIVisION . SUB '91-0019 V 91 -0021 3,. �1` (NPO #2) A ubdivisiOn approval p r feet request gp to divide a arcel of approximately 46,943 square feet into four between 8, 500. and 18,057. s lrs�e feet ZONE: R -4 5 Reeider�U� ..) zoning cu esach. Mao re ea. �eC� is Variance approval t*a. allow a modif e . ail, 4.5 uni *ia/sorce The �tr4o 5 ra�nin allows' tangle family detached residential unite, public support faoilitiea, residential treatment homes„ farming, ' �i day care, bom occupations, temporary us, and rc idential uel tanks a ong the uses . I ATIQ�s 13375 SF 90th Avenue N S51 351A. tax lot 2601) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Comeanit Deve]� ntOC,ca la Octions 16.50, 18.88, 18.92, • . �0, 18,1 \60, and 18.1641 comprehensive Plan �s ���, 1e 1ae ® 10.114, �.� �.� Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, �a .3. , 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. ed is the Site Plan and aj ;,licant ° A statement for your reV1.0104 From info e&►tiorn supplied by various, departmez .e aad agencies and £roe other information avat our staff, a rd! rt as�trl ref/corcaendation will be prepared •' lab .e r nu on the proposal in » a near future. If you wish aa�� a dec�e�,�n dill be rianderexi to count On th!ks application, we needs your Comments h slam. ,. 9, 199. You may Use the apace provided below Os ate i. a separate letter to return your comments. If , .00h are unable to re ®ppnd b the above 4 e please phone the staff contact noted below with your cO maaente and Confirm, your daMMents in Writing are soon as possible. If yov have any questions regarding t .ie matter, contact the Tigard p ,t v1 Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. SW Planning Department, ��ent � p'O Box 2 339 ?, 13125 8 PROIa• 639m4171. STAFF CONTACT: PLEASE ' CHEM THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ea- We have reviewed the r µropoaal and ha** n,o objCctione to it. Pia +aaSa contact � :.. of cur o . f ice. 1," lease refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: saw Name Of Persoet Comments n+ t (0l 9 1 phone Number: bkm/SUE9l- 19 . &SKM WAG ttAikuivitA RECEIVED PLANNING REQUEST FQR cOHMENes ee:-T__"C\kek.A(\A ..� k0.0. '. ✓` 46' DATE: December 30 1991 J 132992 PROMt Tig =t•rd Planning De v,arrt nt 021 �37CLE (HPO #2) A 3EO s requeoe�tS for Subdivision approval _ .�� � pp to divide a parcel Of approximately e� four lots between 8,500 and 18,057 square feet each. ,Also requested is Variance approval to allow a :codified cul -de -sac. /acre support .5 zoning allow® eingle famill � detached residential unit, unite/acre) p�R 4 5 �lities, residential treatment homes farming, manufactured homes, family day care, home a ccupat iore s, temporary use and residential fuel tanks among other tones. LCCATlON: 11375 SW 90th AAeaue (Want 181 35 H,. tax lot 2601) A$PLICARIt4E CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.50, 18.: ».8, 10.92, 18.108, . , 0, 18.163, and 18.164; Comprehensive plan 18.102, 18 �.1� 18. �.5 2.1.1, A/� r` 2 y '7.3.1, /� yy a Q 1.3. Policies 'i.2. �, �{'.�.�, 7.2.3,.,. 7����i,: ®l i��, and 1!M Attachd ias the Site Plan and applicant's etaatknoont for your review. Prom infermation supplied by p ' 9 f P other information available to our Staff, a rapenand recommendation will be�repared an future. If you Wish ^� �°'� P.: lam the near Tutu ,�r. i<�¢� a decision w3.11 be ,; Rd�re¢� on the proposal in th to ,comment on this a.pplicatirm, we need your comments by .7a , 19,2. year bay �the ssspa'�,M p 9 h a separate lette.. to return y.z.lr os�mantsss. vu ar, a provided he� or attach � phone � � �os<,►tasot noted below with ,,our co vane g and confirm irm your c om comments in writing as Soon as resa nd by the above date 1 ass: a:...�le If you have an esationsa regarding this matter, contact the Tigard rte F Planning Department, O Box 397, 13125 SW Nall Blvd.,, Tigard, OR #7223. PROMS: 639-4171,0 ST;AFF CONTACT: 4Tigee Of fat i _.., FLEeeE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no ob eCtidnf to it. Please contact r of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: iw.nra...".ir Y` .__.... ,_.. �.. .. °i���.��mA.��.., ..: •. ,- �.�u:ar auuib«..,:r�sn'.n" o...n..�o... �:. 1... � ".. � „ - �rir�.i...�+.+� ..-:- wwswc��il�i+�.. .�►viisr'�nsave+j lwwievwiriiVisf+a�u,r.{4sYwty. Naaae of Person Comintitgs ]Phone Nwrt; : bkrn /suB91- 19.80 • 1 . •v .0 ' A TO: '. BEQUEST PM COMMENTS DATE December 30 1991 _: FROM: Tigard. Planning Oepaztment ; 1 1SI�01� UU .!51.1 ®19 9 . c r V • 1 -0021 SILER (NPO /2) A ... for lots betdiv divide and fig, 057 pro ately request f ®r sulad3,�riaion approval to �'�.vide a parcel pp 48,943 Ale re feet into four 1 , e feet requested a 'variance a r #lVai to allow a modified call- de -eac. each. �, ]?p ZONE: R -4.5 (RCaidentialA 4.5 units/acre) The R.-4.5 zoning a ; bws single family detached residential unite, public support facilit tee, residential treatment hakes, farming, manufactured homed, family day care, homes occupatio»ns1�.3��5�SWa� 90th Avenue (W�� 3,91.a�dDJ�'el�tan�te among other uses. I y Pte' .,, ax lot 260J1) *APPLZ�3� 1GR'lO1�T10I�T� � ,� A N} # � �I,r92, i 11 .nw c:asvai uk: Oo umunity Dea�elo ft Code sect one 18 50 * 18 88, 1 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 18.160, and 1'3.164; Comprehensive Plan ;Policies 2 111.1, 4.2.1, 1.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.9. Attached is the ;lite Plan and applicant's sitAtemeilt for your review. Pre* information supplied by varioue departments and agencies and frl other inT'ornaation available to our staff, a report and recommendation Yell bya prepared and a decision will be+ reordered on the proposal in thehear future. f you! wish we need your by �.a . You may to cement �n this application, uee the spade provided below or attach a agate letter to return your comments. �f.uon ..tnab to roe y._lhabove date please piton d, the staff contact noted b'l©" With your comsmenta and confirm your Colistente in writing as soon as possible. If 'you hive any questions regarding this riattet, loan* ilt, the Tigard Planning Department, PO SOX 23397 13125 SW Mall Blvd., Tigard, OR 5:123. MOM: 639.43.710 STAPP CONTACT: „SeraG°rr f to .. .._ .... a...,.. PLEASE =OK THZ kOLLOWINO is TAT APPLY: We have reviewe d the p r pe �� and have no Objections to it. t. contact Of our Office. o+r a ®�.wo.li.lwwnr"r°o�.rN'✓„ 11)1etpae refer to the enclosed letter. wri.tten Comaeni e 1,.i r' fiffriist oom .,ate. a, r Of Person Oo enUng: Phone Number: ..:.. bhm/SUB91 - t9•8KM ■ • PlAk ; ect: , . ROPOSED S BDI't'ISION 9 ' 001 ' TO: JERRx `1 Date: 31 Ded 91 09:40:2 IN TH ACS SUSDIV�S7L.ON THE 'DEVELOPER- OWNER, .CRAIG SILER, IS ASI.I G y /M OE (9 1,,3021) MODn / 2yi JUL --DE- SAC IN ORDER TO HAVE THREE,:' LOT'STQ DEVELOP. ZF THIS VA►RZANOE 1E0 A1C+rt'Wiv. c TIC: NOT , HE •ABLE , 2O swpiilp THE CUL- DE-SAC . THE SWEEPERS; MI' . trim OxTY, AOD TO CONTRACT SWI:FFi:A . • OWt t (7.ANNtT MAKE '16' RADIUS C0 RS, TBMIEPORE /IF THIS VmAZRNCE IS aiLO ►:ap IT MUST BE STIPULATED IN WRITTING TO THE DEVELOPER-OWNER AND FUTU ,PROPERTY OWNERS .THAT' THE .. ,. �, THE COL -SAC �, CITY OP ' TICARD, WILL NOT I�ER�'`biRN S�WEE;PI1+��.� �SERVIOi,r .; `�G. ;:' IS MX RE M ;, A`1"ION• TWAT TPA FIANCE NOT 13E 'A ALLOWED o ANY VEHICLE URGER THAN A COMPAC T NOT BE Mit TO MAKE A Ii- URA IN THE CM -D E-SAC AS IT IS • BEING' PROt''OSED. WITH THE SWEEPEi,'t.'S NOT BEING ABLE TO SWEEP THROUGH ME DE-SAC EVERY ,°Z/fS' THE STREET 7[E 0;'0 PT THERE WILL BE A SMALL MOUNT OF DESfkIS LEFT ENE THE SE,, PICK, �• : omS AND ELEVATOR/POWER MAD TO '�3����". STOPS TC� P . �H� �i��h REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: , ,lbeo.,, er.3D 1991 FROM: Tigard Planning Department' saa • 91-0019 Y a 'diva Ja 1 e IiER (NP #y ru eat for Subdivision , a rov to divide a parcel of approximately d g43 ,square feet into four lots between 5, SJf and , y a are fee t each. Also requested is Variance approval pr. o• i t.o allow a modified cui- de i-eac. ZONE: R-4.5 (Residential, 4• S .unit cre 1he R-4.5 5 zoming all ~e single Tamil s� ac heo residential units, public soepport facilities, residential treatment ataent farming, manufactured hoes, family day care, hOme occupations, todl rary ee, ard residential iuel Lanite among, other uses. � .. . 2601) LOCATION: 11375 8 90th Avenue (WCTM 181 35LS,., tax lo, A�PPL�I L REVIEW CRITERIA: Oomunit Development Code Scctiti ne 18 50 18. A5, 18.s2, 18.102, 18.1o8, 18. 114, 18.150, 18.160, and 180164; Oo► preheneive Pl Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2.* 7.201, 7.3.1, 7•4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. , for your review. From Attached is the Site Plan and appl�.o�� -ant a a�ta►i� „meat information supplied by various attr snts and agencies a;nd from other information available to our staff, a report and recoa nendation vti;t1 be prepared to o• proposal by ..3t"� yce. If you wish and a awicac�.��iare will rendered on the ro aanR in the b a� n. . . near fu may lent on vthis application, we need your comments 32 G!ma to cet = rra our use the space oe provided below or attach a separate letter � �•� 1 xw, th® a�aov�e date o the :staff contact please h��i�e noted below with your comments and confirm your comments In writing as soon as p ,csible.De Department, have any questions regarding this m�+,tteu , contact the Tigard Planning Jp s 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tig rd, OR 91223. PHONE: 639,-4171. S°iJFF CONTACT: PLEASE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPL a we have reviewed the proposal and have no ob e©ti a ® t,rr it. P1e5S a col tact Of our office. minatntor Pleanei refer to 4he enclo led letter. Written Commentsb Natat Of . Peruon Coittivantinga Phone Number: birmil/SUB91-19.EEm n.4 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SUB 910019 VAR 91 -0021 FILE TITLE: Siler APPLICANT: Stephen i Cynthia Siler 11375 SW 90th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Orville & Lois Siler 3275 Brush College Road Salem, OR 97 304 Applicant gee eote� Subd.visi�n approval E �'l�...�- �''�.�_ kCgA "P ,_�'� I �.p�P ,� ?. 48,943 square feet 3�n�� four to divide a parcel of approximately proximate y , o 5 57 square feet each. Also re« t e� �.ed is lots between �, a00 and 1a, 0 ZONE: Z� 4 �'ac�.�ance approval to allow a modified cul-de-sac. : °' (Residential, 4.5 units per acre) LOCATION: 11.315 SW 90th Avenue (WCrm 1S1 35DB, tax lot 2601) COMPREMNSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low - Density, Residential NPO NO: 2 NPO CHAIRPERSON Ed Duffield PHONE NUMBER: 639 -4759 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY f S1AFF DECISION .._ I VG: CWNER Same AGENT: Rand• Clarno Alpha Anse .neerung 9600 SW Oak suite 230 Portland, OR 97223 I PLAANING ANT COMMISSION HEARINGS OFFICER DM E OF H. EA °UE _Wea C_g A FF ON' 3991 DATE OF HEARING: TINS :7 : 3 _._..._„_: f TIME :.7:0 - TINE :7: CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND VICINITY li X N RArr1 SITE PIS AT ."1' CI MENT : I ANDS', "PING PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN OTHER: lvd.Z',' E FOR PLANNER APPROVAL: TISEMENT TIGARD TIMES OREGONIAN rye .y. NOTICE MAILED LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE ... TION _ rE�eTA��E OF APPLICATION alb ��.. NOTICE TO DLCD -� ATTACHMENTS: .:�.... :- STAPF CONTACT: Jetty Offer Code , 1 o 16 a 1 6.5 0 , 18.89, 19,.92 1 6. 102, 16,100# 8.11 4, 11150 , 160 €4 Com p rehensive Plat Policies 2 . 1. 4.�1 7.1.2 0 7.201 v 1.4.4 0 8.1.1, Iota 81. 3m USE LISTINGS: Single is tiiy deta� hegt zesidentia�. y�ipublic ni•ta _. : s �:��ent �-'. �. treatment home, ufactured homes, f amil day Gaa o , home occupation, temVorarY xrdanpt�r•k f Baer i l ,�t e:� , r�� � use, res id.entuat fuel tank` and aoceJsory structure. ':.Mi i Y�' CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 -� (!03) 639-4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCA'� J k:'3'rat .: l.N,... I e SITE SIZE j , .:Sst.. PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* SA a hen Cra1 g &{: C nth' a , hUtband & mtfe, Orville Porter & Lois 7 � i � wife � PHONE Carol Su l er husband & w7 �:3+�570 ADDRESS U2 5 SW 90th Ave ' IP 3 CITY FOR. STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO._ 4?('— °T EM C iSE 14D' 8 d2_ RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DAT E . i ."' .."� Application ei %gents submitted A-9)1,Application form (1) "(0) Owner's signature/written ,",aJuthorization e. C) Title transfer Instrument (1) isessor's map (1) 4.,05—Preliminary *net (pre —app checklist) Appl .cent's statement ddre` S ar`i c crh't 9a, �prev°app ctnec . ist) p *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record' or a leases in possession with Written authorization from the owner or an agent of the . owner With Written authorization; The owner(s) must sign this application In the space provided on page two r submit a written authorizatA.on with t aie application. ;`OSAL 'SUMMARY d mc�n to divide a � 4�, 9�3psq owners of recorc of the stab ect ro erty y ,:quest permission °�^� Total. Arec3J parcel into four 14 }ts between (number of lot') and I ' square feet n size.- • per lot) ,4. l:.,Q fo subdivision v r COiETE DATE DEMB1 �' "i'' 0 COMP. PLAN/ZONE DE IGNA`ilCbN d 14. P. . Number: Preliminary; Plat 4ppt oval Dates' Final APProtfal plane: Engineering Recording Date aad liumba7e. • List any variance,. Planned Development, sensitive ; n ur ai�the&�;� y.an< actlw -q to be considered as part of this aPPlioationt i a Applicants: To have a o,omplete aapplicaation. You will need to cubit ,a ttaahmeuts described in the attached information sheet at the time your submit tLie app1 i.caati.oxt� d THE APPI ANTS) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ® •The "-above re ues ; does not _ N .a ila ,a ed restrictions that m be attached -? to or imi used u * on the sub ec t 4 xo fir; t o l a If the application is - granted, the applicant will excercise the rights gra u,tedl in aCktordance with the tees and subject to all the conditions 811d limitations of the approval. • Al]. of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attael�.caa it�ae nts, and exhibits transmitted ' herewith, are true; and the , . this e applicants is so acknowledge that any permit issued a . based on application may be d that may' such statements are;'' 1 revoked if it is fours fraise a nn o The applicant has read the entire co ►te* to of the application, including the policies and criteria, and ruderstand8' the requirements for a p pr oving , or denying the application dry of �....:� d... -'' ,. tam iw e I r7wu� `� ,rµ�... 'w'Ri"r SIGNATURES S cf each owner (ego husband and wife) of, the subject property. (KSL:pa� /O52Op) i:.,�; i.i i •� J fti.�..;iuSa�:� 4 to subdivij, on 1,12 acres with a variance to allot,/ a modified c.ldcsac. SITE L0ATIONt The azt,11361 of S.W 91st Court, south in tersectiOn of 'S,Iitte. forth Dakota' Street . 91st Court. . , n. n. C)WNVR/AIIPLICAN9L,s Craig Sller & Cynthia Oiler 113115 611 90th Ave, Tigard, OR ,97223 Orville suer and Carol Siler 3275 13rt3,011 College Road Salem, OR 97304 . DgVELOPLIR8 Craig Siler 11375 S.W. 90th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 13.014INC4: Low Denoity Residentia to 3. R-4.5 (Residential/445 unite Per acre) aininittim lot size: 7,500 square feet. PLAZA WEST A sUITE230 A 9600,5.1,iv4,,,OAK A PORTLANb Ofl 97223 ."' A 5O3452-003 FAX 5�3.4 ' 2' 4" • , y 1� STREETS AND ACCESS: l . A cul-de-sac shall he as short a „t Possible and shall in no event be mor them 400 f e t :in a. All cul -de -sac aAall terminate with a oiroul a tur naround4 ; zd b. The length of the cull a ®sac shall ho maasured along the centerline of the roadway from a near side of the intersecting street to they farthest Peint of they cui de' -sac. Proposed c ese to lots 2 through . 9let Court, Half �+ arcul�elems�.c terminus �= xi.stsrat the south end � of 5 .Mi. O1st Court. This project is requesting a variance from the Community Develop-. meat Code to mbdify a standard cul de -sac thrnaroundm The Community Development Code requires a cul-de-sac to end with minimum a 0 ft. right-of-way radius and a e nr 42 feet curb radius. The existing half cul-de-sac has a 53 foot right ®ofway radius and a 45 foot curb rad =us o A modified cul -de -sac is re- quested which iS a pp roxY mater � 75 %0 in size, of the standaxa cul-de-sac. See the varia nce request below. The owner proposes to execute an agreement to waive his rights to remonstrate against a future Local improvement District to im- prove S.W. ® 90th avenu: as opposed to constructing S. E . 90h Avenue street i .r�ovemeuts . Sion ib . 164. ®3O . C. ii of the t munity Development Code allows a waiver hen "Due to the nature of existing development on adiacent oar i. future p . d he fro � . �� i� �� x�ul�.�e1 that e�tr� ®t ies ��►�����ta� ou1 extended in the for . and th . improvo ebt a � o. e (table under review does not : itel s��iated ��th th r _ . � r �' # provide e Safety ®��.d� a"3t. caPacitY;" This is the cond t i o: n of S.W. 90th Avenue, therefore a t a, m . .. er rights to reisnstrate ag ainst a f uture proventent District is requested 1 The cross - section of streete in inches oh than the minimuot shown.. in the f ol, .e i n table: Leveling Type of Street Subbase Copra Surface Art ri 120 ® island Co11 a 0r oro 'ft o Local Street Oar 4" The final 1t 't shall be placed ou . all new ou5truotiohn roadwaYe V� 4or to Citrr f i, oa1. aeoepta ,o ti of the roadway; however, nOt before 90 er,�aent of the otruoture in the new d .,.volop � nt p • completed unlo s three years have rata stied since is ttiation of oouotruCtion in th devolopent. A clarification of the standards is requested pursuant to place- merit of the final lift of asphalt on new peons Lift of Tills project requests t. ability place it's final. p. the alb�Ll�t to pavement in conjunction wrath 90% completion of the recently construct d "Groves" ubdiva a' .on directly north of this development. This eliminate a "old joint" on the b the opportunity to ela�t� �a�.11 create providing p �. � final lift thin rov`idin an improved pavement in egr .ty. 5anit r ,r Sewerrt will be extended into the site via 30W0 913t Court Surface drainage will be directed to S.W. 91st Court Water: Waters available to the site through S.W. 91st Court. Variance 3 ef) A variance is requested to modify th evil-do-sac turnaround .J radius. The odif .ed cul-de-sac turnaround proi adeq t e traffic circulation and compiles math Fire topar te t require '° ment � for a hammerhead turnaround. see the Preliminary plat for geometrida a arc it le f .a. .m i 400 feet. The length of the eu�. de � �� ` than 4Q 18.160.120 e pricer f'or bran img_h_y I The H ,r ,acing e Officer shall Consider the pplic tion 'raria; ce at th same me ting at, which it oonaidore prelim1naxy plat. A, varian :le may be .:.ppa. awwed, app `oved with Ae!nied provided the Hearings Officer finds: ® Ther, . are , peoial oiranmstandes or conditions affecting th . h P . y which are unusual and peculiar to the land ro ®r� similarly situ : tad; as compared to other lauds s3�mi�. • The variance is necessary ,r the proper dosiga' function of the subdiviion. The b� prop subject eot ro p erty is 110 feet in depth. Completion of the ex- isting half cul-de-sac turnaround radius would reduce the .lot depth to less than 60 feet. This lot dapth is unbuildable and would eliminate Lot 3. The variance is necessary to allow a g and zoning. design consistent with the ° neighborhood the _ not detrimental . t® 3. The granting of e varia*' a will u be the public health® safety, and welfare or injurious njurious to th rights of other o,n rs of property; and • T vari.ano in necessary for th ,T prey y: rvatiou and en'- for the conditions, or or e . _ r art right because of an �, extraordinary aordinery hardsip �a��� would ffiult from rom etrio compliance with the regultiens of this title. (Ord. 90 41; Ord. 89 -06; Ord., 83-52). modified cul-de-sac turnaround is not detrimental to public The anod�,f ` . the safety nor injurious to the rights of others. Completion of and confor- mance modified cul-de-sac will i.mprov'� current circulation mange to Fire Department standards for a hammeth „gad turnaround Qla ►cress lots 2 and 4 meet the Protected Solar building line (10 Proposed laa The solar and the middle of the south lot). T building n line it _ a ° � falls ���h�n the reat yard se�b,�. ok Lo�t.. 4 � requireS bu�ld�.ng southerly ��► erg . peen �th � building line which is 31 feet to the sou y p a solar bull e - ° a line which line. �n �u��d�.��on� �o�, 3 �a. west rly building lin protects Lo.,”; 4. Perfor anoe Option. is be � at l.ea��a 32 o i on o , The houee �s o L�� 3 complies with the, oriented off of an east -west q , . f �� �.��.� and re u�.re� a �` � hr,� glass and 500 square feet of the to be � Ce'd eou , . ,. � r h� rdaof area �. uPth .. , the a-csign:Lied to Lot Existing road Lot rota Lard a4116 egocist von' the des1 ra r g dtitmr1.- d applied t. reveA An taitdar ipor ht...,ofo-Oalte gn or a I if e at e and e3C acoess0 et tilt* percent istirk public isting ex hails d for so ar • ritia b :Log °X.2.8 4. a? -; , • HORN tQ r� TANGEL D i,4 i to i tote I :ntc rep?"- ;. istice .eciplted .by:tho City 4#\\ of lilacs! :a ioisiag Ge ro -' WC inforaatloi Syatem X35} ssftselm. 'Infor- mative 'wive-led here may be ietrede d to 6. cat's! 'a i tb % it i o an ] N 0 1 T N te-efiliecif oedfer interptetiti ro do -1e es 6etermi ttd » the City ;of 71g4". {IdFB41 t 4;? 4 4:4D (13j.2- 4 }:97') e `m.wTQ .-),. • f, ..._.r..t w.n:.s.• V � �.wi •owl urw �w'� 1 Imo/ fi l I LT» 1£ � , ,,b,. roe °° t t : I I .y I a TI F 1 t. r 1 H � N � � Ip ,', i .., • p J s I �FFi� i t �) ` I I 1 � ... err ' -r �.. i - Le+. o+w e.sii w.. r�.l i J' , I ;+ y t t ' ,,,r4 c1 • \1 r I maim. y.� . . , STEWARTnag Ac kl Ae tgE RECORDING RETFI tN To: gTRPHki ! CRAIG FILER CyN FIXA MARIE > ILER, ► 11375 SW ODTB TIGA&BWy, OR 97223 UNTIL ORI'MER NOTICE, Ada, NUft126 " TA2 HTATPAENTS SHALL BE SE � st SP >HDR } CRAIG SILER CY FTBIA t'9AUIB SILBB 11375 SW. 90tH, TIGARD, O OR 07223 TAX ACCOUNT F . a 181 35DB 02601 STA` UTORY AREA a°TY DEED BOBBIE :JORDAN Grantor, conVeyss and warrtntn to STEPHEW ,C AIG ,• SILER AND CYHTIIiIA MARIO SELER, HUSBAND AND WIFE AND ORVILLE PC RTER $ILen AND LOTS CAROL SIL201. HUSBAND; ,4ND WIPE' +rafter , the following described .'eal property' free of anOumbrnri oo aritoept as specifically set f orth herein situated in .WASHINGTON Coti �»!' Oregon, to-wit s .PIGARD, COUNTY OIL WASHINGTON AND STATE OP` '�� OP THE NORTH 110 FEET ARKCCiI�. LLB PARK, Its THE CI Zi The said property is free from encuMbranees,EXCEPTI THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PREM /SES ARE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OP THE UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY; RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC IN AND TO ANY PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PREMISES L3(NG WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NdT° ALLOW USE oP THE 'PROPERTY bESCRIDED IN THIS fl STRU!ENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND, REGULATIONS, BEFORE SIGNING' OR. ACCEPTING THIS INST>RVMENT a THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TIT' E TO THE PROPERTY SOLD CHEC:X WITH THE APPROPRI, TS CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES, The true oonaideration for this conveyance is S1600000.00. Dated this ' ` day of December, 51091. 15 JOR `` wAINIHGTON CO�U,�N+TY S Ad . MOPErtY raivi EA9 nu _211 pm Wag ciared the above named BOBBIE JORDAN and forgoing AnstrUMens to be REF voluntary act Notary 'Public for' OREGON .My co0Miaaion expires t SitatittOOritti00 JfIni Hen and Teucatsati 0 fr...F; stintaal Idr "; Ih. *MA r! a0 Attinsmonit r Gatti w.:eti9y that •�Cpbt".` Doc M 9�M6Y 64 �fi9 iii 3': 2Aft watialsrAffighWint CITY OF TIGARD' PRE-APPLICATION PRE-APPL/CATION CpNPERENCE NOTES PROPERTY LOCATION ADDRESS: 7 TAX MAP ' & TAX LOT: NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): V :p PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: (15_,tekataidAll ihkatitiOttr, 4:weeps 1 .1600. 00X.IA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: br-zts. ZONING DESIGNATION: Fel. NEIO BORHOOD PLA,NNI, G ORGANIZATION #_!;),. .. CNAIEPERSON: PHONE: a ' ZONIji G DISTRICT DI.'ENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: ,,, : `�!'�' sq. ft. Minimum lot width: _SA f , 3C s runt. Agl ft. side -.51 ft., rna - ft. garage. ft. corner.. ft. from both streets. " Maximum site coverage: Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: Maximum building height: BO ft. ADJITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: d through the minor land g 25 feet unless lot is created throex partition process. Lots created ad • part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 fps of frontage or have a minimum 15 fast Wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 t0 le S:xECIhL SETSACRS ,ens centerline of g ..� ft. from Le t roraet _ '544 *Flag lot: 10 ft. side stack w1on the site e lacaanr day �t� g Y accessory tructt rea: up to r .`? p S �ar�� ft. in ®ire =5 ft. setback far ®ia, Side and ,.•ear lot :Linea Acceasoty structures: up to 000 a €� �t . (where allowed) � � See.. Zero applicable zoning dii3trict setback, line lots: mi imum 10 foot separation between buildinge residerti aL building g .separation: See Code Section 18.95.030 ti 1;i Sp CIAX. BU :LDINZ HEIGHT PROVISION Flag Lots: Maximum height of 14/2 stor%eo er 25 ft., .0' ichevo47 is less in rn t zones; 2-1/2 stories' oi� i `"?4,4 I� ` ,-2 or R -40 , ...ones if standards of Code' e€ o n 10 S,V9 .1;3�b ('D� ) ace met. wKd% av� Building Height Exceptions , (Code Section 18 « 8420:)r''r S,i di�ga, located in a non - residential zone may be built to a. heiggit �It f. 7!i fe pv �videda' 1. A mini*im FAR (building " ,1�oo,r. axe gio site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exis�:l.d, a 2. All actual building etbackc 9e be at least 1/2 th building's height; and 3. Th uct nrd - will 'Aot but a residential • • ".4:; Liz riot. StDPNT11 � i SITS t t oc TICb, I r �' ^ t ' 4 •,, `` k p'�y'�'d. 4 ' � ..: / � y ,+,� a , V ' � i r. i.fsv��'� 5 � .e�iA1. ��es y al zone 0fp 'i 0 e ,, en Cod 9h. �� ', ,18: .4 p Aff „ ;the N, .:,,net A.j. "``�� �°��,iwn i�*�i.Y . ay y �, 4‘'4"' s�`w.d «r t.. ! xui.J' 8� ,d+ �� ,�t, 4 d t . .,'i..4: s4 s d nnia nit all wadtin a p,Fnrt .b tar Bits may be ca .4.0 .atei by r0'.. ;; '". t . * '' did$, .ding hae net area of the developable azcv a by the minimum number of square feet res ctrOd per dwelling Wait in the `'appli ;abler zoning district. Net development area is caiculat'ad by subtracting the following land area(s) from the g, :oss site area %, I. ' All s, rltsitive « laud ?",'areao t Ian within "the 3Io ' year 'floodplain ..► lopes ' e eeding, 25 ■ arainagdways r m i } a, ' Land dedicated 9Eor parkw purposes Ap �,,' Pu is right- of-way dedication All ' lcInd provided for private street (includes acceseways through parking areas) .e • The City of Tigard allows a residential density, transfer of up to 25% of the units that could otherwise, have been de Loped on sensitive lands areas lister an (1) above to the developable portion Of the site in accordance with Code Section 38 92.030 accord It is the respons ,Nility o application, to "illl'oV `do a de density and density Y,ri:an • _.. ca..t or i residential development led calculation for permitted residential RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SWAB, ACCESS 74SQUIPEIUNT6 Effective May It 199;7, all subdivisions rind Minor partitions are edb ject to Solar access requir> ments which state that SO% of all lots deselopedi Itet be solar -- oriented. The characteristics of A solar - oriented lot a re 11,1,c1hi levels 41 wintertime sun striking the soui,b walls and toofts of tka house,_ house orientation maximizing south window zdsitreao and a mouth- sloping roof areas., To achieve this, one may e utilize . :.tae follow ng: 1. Basic requirement Design a lot with at "least te feet of nort*,eo; th on wigs :6n ..3.C6 de rec, d ,bf south; 2, Protected Solar . lot dimensivin and an o�gie�,tat� The i . . ,. g , ,�� . . ,� aj be oriented within 30 degrees p i of South, solar b) have da minima if 10 feet between it and the middle of the lot lab the south, a) have I , a gti:n r , of 45 feet between it and the northernmost bOundllrr of they lot on which the building line IS iodated. buildable 3. Perforsance Options: The first option requires the house . to be • of d ground deg cos of an east ewes:, axis and have at least oriented within 3ti Idec ree ` ,o second' SG% the g � th wall p roteoted from shade. Th' ':sage 2 • • .11 option requires at least 32% of the glass and 500 aquare feet of the roof area to face south and be protectee from shade. Total or pa.rtiai exemption of a site from the solar access requirement can be for the following reasons: 1. East, west or north elopes steeper than 20%. 2. Off -aite shade sources (structures, vegetation, topography). 3. On-site shade sources (vegetation). Adjustments allowing r dttction of the aot 'solar lot design requirement can be for the following reasoneg 1. Reduced density or an increaeed cost of at least five percent due to - easto west or north slope greater than 10% significant nAtural feature, - existing road or lotting pattern, - public easement or right eoieway. . Reduction in important development aMenitlem. • PrOeexisting shade (vegetation). Maps and text sufficient to show the develoPment co plies with the solar design standard, exce& for lots for which an exemption or adjustment is required, including all of the fol/owing items: . The north-south lot dimension and front lot line orientation of each proposed 2. Protected solar building lines and relevant building eite restrictions, if applicable. 3. For the purpose of identifying treep exempt froM Section F, a map silowing existing trees .at least 30 feet tall and over 6 inChes diameter at a point 4 feet above grade, including their height diameter and species, and stating that they are to be retained and are exempt 4. Copies of all private restrictions relating to solar access. If an exemption or adjuutment is requested, maps and text sufficient to show that given lots or arced in the develormient cempl,y with the standards for sudb an exemption or adjUstment shall be submitted. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRAN TION Regardless of th a1,0 °using density in a zoning district, any property within 10 fee of a designated established area shall not be developed at a dens Y grsater than 125 percent of the Maximimn Compreheneive Plan d-E,gnation (not zoning) of the adjacent parcel. PARKING AND ACCESS Required automobile parking fox this type of reet - sbeenelmrrmle&ealeithired Parkilmg: 9641-01-rtlitrtred spaces may be devignated coMPact-onlY mPaces- Standard parking &pace dimensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. Compact pakking apace dimensions: 8.6 X 15 ft. Handicapped Parki required automobil designated handitmp Ail PagkIng area's Providihg In excess of five glrpaced B1t1 Provide appitop*ziately Iodated and d Parking aPacea • The manila= =mbar of handic&SPed Page 44;:. • 4 parking spaces to be provided and paring apace size are .mandated by the Oregon ' itevised Statist handout) .. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be pa ed on the king space surf an appropriate sign shall be pr ided. .. Bicycle ` racks/ are required fo commercial us4o, and ind = al us parking spacer Ae parking bicycle. rack space per 15 auto par located in areas protected from aut can provide epecificationo for appro All perking areas and driveways must Drive -in use queuing areas:,, Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Maximum access width: ir. vic uses, non- resi.dedn al uses, sa providing 15 or more automobile st be provided at a ratio of. one ng spaces. Bicyclel racks shall be 'bile traffic. The Planning Divieion e4 bicycle rack types. be paved. Pedestrian Ecceess must be areas, provided betwce sa �d eatraaetes.� parking en building entrances and erk areas, outdoor , sidewalk For detailed information eves ®e �cnt Code Chapters fete x�x].A� parking �� sr�S � and accesses, see Community 11J p GZF,AR VISION ARRA vision be m' ink alined between three The City requires that clear visi� a ee and eight feet above grade at road /driveway, road /railroad, and road /road intersections in specified clear vision areas. The size of thia,required clear vision area depends upon the- abutting' . street ° s functional classification. LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on 'a public or, private street or a drive mo than 100 feet in ..- treet trees i p - -way or d o vivate property t within ss et of the right ublial, boundary et trees must P. ro rte � Sttr P F y on ve grade. � tap... depending � da Street have a minimum call. °' .lhoul4 he spaced 20 to 40 feet o mature tree Elite. a: a£ irw �� es .. t four feet . . . . a . ,. gu g trees and a list of latiQns a£fe ti;rn s�areet recommended edn street t' ; a zS vary be obtain from the Planning Division. recommssrac'a�ca sires a ui;mum of one tree per seven parki p sy ,,.rears in order to prov around aski.n r / screening of Parking areas from va.ews, provided. g spaces must be planted in and de a Py effect. tandscaped from Public c r i ht e -of -way must be Page 4 �.r IPPEY XNG AND SCREENING In order. tO 'increase privac�v,, del to reduce or e1irt na+ a adverse 1.0... eii off+ 1 r., . j , v . g dii e:itt4 t vsua1 „impacts be�wefsa ,�� ad ac ;u�� dine, �.c ante ��s�.al.� i�set�re� land used" the City r®+ uirdrl� 1aa*d aped `` 'arc ��,�: aacrPas ceac�`a�.�t i Rer�iz�ed: buf �` r at7eas are descr, e e in to �u . ¢ gerd node of Ear a zhma be' cup .ed. .b3'; . e ure off;; dr c .duouE and ;iairgreet3.. tras� anal ehr s. k , gu� red in, 0 �r = cases, and . • RI Iuiz , rl ':buf or areas may o utilities, an sidewalks. Additional:information cn raga courndi ' irra Cede chapter 18.100 landscaping and buffering. Required buffer widtt s appi.icab ft. along north boa ft. along south holm In . additieno, Sight obscuring s ed buffer area materials and bites ; try ' b€ and the Plantai>:iP, b,nLon b11et.n a' e to 71pur proposa a area: aidtg Oast bcun ft. 'along %g ont boundary SIGNS Permits must be .obta .a e 1 befo A ' "Guideii.nea for Sign' Pe 1dditig a1 sign area or height b the ,,sign propoaa1 La' reviewed a sign is the 'City of Tigard. handout is, available upon i eguest. and a atanda de may be. perrnitted if part of a development ,application* :ication* SENSITIVE LANDS • cR niG diLE ASSOCIATE BROKER THE Ct E A L 0p7r!9hAt : F8p-.p'i�17 ,�yNi IBC�f'��±±S yi�.�`�lE, 91006 OFFICE,(563)626-4600 RES,(503) FAXk05O )6209 MO iL' (500) 9 ° . 6 9 /t _ " • I '• ■'■ 1.* PRckEDRE review.• , „ 11• 987 „bet :t e befOie the flanning making a rec-- Omaendatio,n on • Another pb1iO hearing is °,/,0*ad ty,„t4ch pity Counail. I • • • • • , • • ' • • I • , , • „ , • , , • , „ " , , n, I ' • , , ' , I , ' • , ' ' ' , 311 ap1Laationa moat muat »e . aca3pte4: eitaff, ',Membor, at #40 doittaunitk 'thr#010pmatit",..bapitrtiiiiint adunte at AppliatiOns 3ubittted by mail '6;&'dtettped off a the .66111nter'•;*yitliciir*: Plwrning Diaion • ,a,c5laptarica°-mair ' be -retn'.'rnedo euhtaitted. after 430 Thur�af t,i11 be:9 p batched or prOdeasing with the,. f�11wing week's aplidatiOns, O100. .:114)0°,,appliCations,Vil/ e additpted°' after 00 PJ!. on. Friaya Or 4:3O on other • I MOO' 141,,th applioation sha1,1:°:te folded in advance to ,8 5 by 14', One 8 4 5 1.4(04' by l no)). map o prOposed'..prOjisOt.•' ShOuld,, be submitted or attachtet,, to the •Sta4f repot. „0r. adtiniatratitrto the Planning bi,teion d ingineeritaq preiitinary •;`, review-. Of the . alcv1ioatian ” and will de*ernine weter an appli,datiOtt • • dotp,I.ete Within,. 10 Ldayit o Ettibtnittal 0taff wLll ntiti,fy an applidant additional infOrtation � cOr,qtoit 41;:he subtitiet Materi.S.13 'are 'needed.' • • • , • ,, . . The 1 admin,ietratle. • doiaienUb1.i� hearing iyita$y 'ti wll 060tir apprOititately 45 to 60 ,.'days ,atte,,e •, .atpil.oat.iOn akt, ,,,,*tecl ,dainp)..01,0 the ist,44.viog 011, ut fames ort • requiring by t iictLona may,, *like review. Written decibiOniss ,are, :wititin, 19 day-is 0:the hearing 4 be ilieard .„t°' . • day appeal period " diftqi,altoria,,. tiii.aiipiSal,Ott',thit6, matter A basic flow diagram iiittstratifig the revietit4,' groOttae i0;41tailab*,0 ft01:11 Planning Divjain. • The pre-application co reke an the notes of th*t!,,'conferettao are 1,./tended to infoita the vitospeotive applicant ' of the ptizia,0 COidartinity DooSlopment code requirement S applicable to 'dettolotipient Of a particular site and to allote the . Staff, and progpfaotiva, aplicat to "diSOtiat3 , the OppOrtuni,tieti and tctrainta affeOtintr .deitelOptiint.: '• the The conferee and itiotel Catitibt cover all Code reipitements • and triapetta. of good Site planning that anduld apply to the idettelOpiteitt WI your: site plai • • Failure of the staff. to ,provide any ,information *belied hi the code ahali • not constitute a waiver of the applioahiot standatde or reOtitetent00. .,.Xt, is redOtiftended that a proapaotive. appli#aot , either Obtain .' and tead, the Coreitunity Devel.opitient„ dode, Atik:4ty ,".0.ittitit4.15;46 of it 'Staff relative to Code reqUirci.tentizi prior to cubitting an appliCation.. • Andrther :15tet..appi.toation Oorif00#0140.6 ic regnited if ati;•,applidatibit 40' to be etibmitted ntbre than eli irtiothe ;tifter .,t140, • 1 L'Oatitult dontei,e0tioei,•'H ,• : ,-• unless the second dorifdiietiO0 ic 4010464 eoecsay bj ' the :'PlAild4;144 : lit ., . PREPARED BY ,i,,, k=it,0:-. .t. ..,...4. ' ' - P . 'NO 0 . VP' kVION P1'101,1-X : 6394..4 )',1!11. t [ tl.age 6 4,5 1. Ise NO PDBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of thi pre- appa.ic�.ti n conference s t : (L)id��tif y applicable Lon P rehet3ive Plan vol i4ies and ordinanc eprovisions; ( ) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns? and (iii) iii., to review the application review process with this applicant including identif;, *tng who will be the final decision maker for the application. public dedications to be . 3c�no of the applicant li ant will be recommended by Citty. staf and approved by eP' ea City staff to by the�ap�rropx�,at® authority. et$ff until 11 commenting agencies, t4 the decision ana,:er b y public y to review and comment on the and the ublic bav+s had an opportunity application. The following comments are a projection of public P may required as a condition of improvement related requirements that ma be development approval fcr your project. ti cx 1,__ _ f w.n y ci� it al .d+ The City of Tigard requires that ],and area be dedicated to the public to increase ,abutting public rights -of -way to the ultimata functional street classiiication rights ,oaf -• vay width specified by the Community Development Code. Apps tat of a deveelupr:Int application for. this site will require p dedir�ation of right-of-way or C1,z�e�' 4 C�► 1. s 4 to � _ e. ot"' plb r �.;. at' �tr3.T�91YJroy lmen �te street improvements v4111 be necessary along • street improvements will be necessary alone • 3. Needed street improvements will include 47 . a . pave rent lne curb and gutter ®, storm sewers, five-foot wide sidewalk, necessary street Signs, streetlights,' and a two ..yea t atreetlaghting fee. �.�.....�. s rcvc�ae� to may be caseu where street improvements or other neceeoan ublic In some c Y y improvements are not currently practical, the sl rest ...�alCt y deferred. In these cartes, a� a condition of developmenit approval, the owner s ` ranee agreement which waives property � i moat execute a non-remonstrance � property � ... , A �k�yve� g the owners right to rernans't ate against the fo ation o a local , Improvement d iatriet formed to ,.m , 1. Vik3 2 zedeebrieninterrnAtewalTet • Sainita Sewers The clo gist .s... its e yyq�� �, :..'. ,, r :. this property is an ,,.. inch line located 4E4. jitiStStitiki. 1�i �- The proposed' developcsigtt must be dronnecYtyedd to a banitary sewer. _t °«� r M tM Storm sw ar 3 nn • rovements i CU ee Page • wa er , 'Supniy_!; The ; ��' ]� Water Distri (Alone: ) ° Provides publ water se 'ice iin, c the a.ma of this site The District should be contacted. ' ,qr ;;information regarding water , Su' ►. ',. for your proposed development. Fire Protection: :Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District °(Contact: Gene Birch .11, 645-8533) provides fire Protection servicea Within. ;`,he; City of .T3 gard` 'The District . should . be contacted For, information on a.egar'ding the 'adequacy of circulation systems, : t»e need . for fire hydrants ° Or other questions related to fire protection. Other. Agency Permits: TR2I1 !C , X4pACT FEES gn ,Augneti 1990, the' Washington county Board of Commissioners adopted .the cap ^sty wcide Traffic ('1!IF) Ordin once and referred the, ineast re to. the Waehingte . pcaunty► voters 'In Septe m r, 1990, , the Wasi4iragton .0 my a e1eatorate aver rhe1airagly approved expanding the TIF , ppograr .*tt tt,zrou h , • all tiriedictions• Withitii 'the ceuntk. Thi&3 sotian glace into, ''effect On, increas3ed -street, development' fee ' `on 'all' new • development :n Washington County.' The' city' of ' ,Tigard, ha® a loptcd° the county ' s prgr►. T he ciaty Traffi cYspA - 4'eML p*ng will coiled file tf ,fro*+ uew development ' bl eed the deve1p Pm ent'�s p r ec d .in Pact, 6it . the ` tranttportatlon system. , , Developing pro perties will be requireal. to pay based on the nwnber of tripe they are projected to generate,. The T•IO., is, dal alatod�' 1a®ec'i 'on type of use, size Of project, and a general use based . fe'a category. the . TIF shall be calculated L at time of building • permit isneuance. in llmited circumstances, payment of the TIP' May be allowed to be c sgerrecl until issuance of, occupancy ' permit, Deferral, of payment `'ail, gccnpa cy ,3s permieeible gray when the T1F' is greater thiit *5,000.00. Swittit ATER QEJALtTY PEES The tnai.fied�..S „g Y ; c "star Maria , 4;t'kaae� agec: to u ewers e h gene has eetabliehed a_t+d the ! pkt onforce, Resolution Rio. 90-43, saatrfa a to g� t Rfiiigul:ata'oho clu g water quality facilities' or fees i n lLeas of 'their cornstru+ctiort. 'he reso qu suet on of on -:sate as lttt,ic►na . re �:teed that a. fee and/or xFl ran t e .COS�st l.ty fsa ! e feet or rtio✓' 'the amount • of araa erviotae eurfae~e, f'ori�vteay. 2640 s3��na��� fee a baposed onra,", built. oons3tr^iact en of a water a r ��' thereof, the fee shall be $316.06 The City. of Tigard,determirneS i,>E a fee or ia►cil i y shall be bua.lt e STAEEt O'EIxNG PE1aiblciga� -of-.y Thal „ hn_o ob w� yy o nisi . 1��. £ror'n th+a En ins rng. De artmentY� � ':, Baas o btairled a L I Jp, rW1P work within n�eree Pe 9 'p� c! i g P rg • PINISEED FLOOR ELEVATYONS on all projects h g. g P the a� pplicaaa'it ,shall subm iat with tBa ® - grading pJ�an aequtypical floor plan' for egat.h lot wiaielir shall hav a of ,that twat v1an alon with elevations at t,e y Yee • c�S°ner ®C►��eaC�'a' 1 ®�.f four" co�"t, i s�� � w� ,� ,, ! N ie�!,,si y" �s 3 PRBPdAI ED - Bye r t$ IY�EtAII4G i i sioN Oft . r 639 -4111 00: PAPP . MS Page' ctrr OF TIG iRD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 'APPLICATION +CHECLYS'1` The items on the checklist below are recuired for the successful completion °of your application submission requirements. This checklist. identifies what Is required to be submitted with your' apf,)l :cation This sheet MUST be broUoht z tad submitted =with all other materials At the tittle, ` you YY_ submit your f • for ,further � �.:wuli�E !1r �`St7 /Y :�'.f . Of these 9�"R.1M2 �or., application.; see your application call Planning at ,639 -4171 BASIC MATERIALS A) (1 copy) A Application form �, B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument 0) Assessor's flap E)' Plot or site Plan F) Applicant's statement (G r, (H) Filing fee B 15 it* for SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site or raataon showins (No. of copies rte,): 1) Vicinity Map ate sRxe.� dimensions 0-1O% ,or n 3) Contour lines (2 ft or 5 ft for grades 4), Drainage patterns, courses,, aced ponds 5) LOcationS of natural hazard areal i1�sl,csdiAg a) Floodplain areas b) Slopes in ex ess of ' 259 c) Unstable ground d) Areas with high seasonal. water table e) Areas With severe soil erosion potential f) Areas having sever ely Weak foundation soils Location of resource areas as shown on the compr"ehen Map inventory including a) Wildlife habitats b) Wetlands '/ Other site features: a), Rock outcropping b) .Trees with frC grt and ie 3) Locatiop of existing • 9). •Location ..and type of 10) Location af= e; a Sta ng 1i) • Location of enistirig s caliper measured 4 feet ve1 ± tructures arid. their user fibre and off s to noise s0u�rce utilities ant easeierts, dedicated ra+ ht —of 4iay s ) Site Dena a lc pment Plan sho'4 i (No. of copies ) 1) The proposed site and surrounding Properties 2) Contour line interval 1 ) The i cation, dimensions and names of alai: a)' Ekisting & platted streets I other public, wa an.; easements "on the site and on ad joining Pr Uarties APPLICATION C$1ECRLIST — Page .1 b) 'roPosed streets or other?publ;, i ays ' & easements on the site. c`) Alternative routes of : dead end or propose Streets :that;; "regUire future extension e) The location and dmension of.' a) Entrances and ex itn on The site b) Parking and circulation areas c) • Loading, and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) .Above ground ut l tio3 5) The location, dimensions & Setback distances of a ll: a) Existing net'manent structure, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property ,Within 25 feet of the site b) Proposed 'str »jc tures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage !Facilities and analysis of Downstream cor3itions 7) .,,, Sanitary sewer ,('.'xcil'ities ,. a 8) The location of areas ;t9 "b 4a dscaped '9) `The..Ippaticrrt +,.t i' r tofu clffitd,p4ori lighting considering crime prevention ':techniques 10). The location of mailbones 1 ) The location of all: structures and their c riehtation 1/) Ex Oting or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements Ge da.ng `Plan (No. of 'copies ) The site development plan hall •include ,a grading plan at the same sc ale as the site analsis drawings and shAll contain the following information: 1) 1 the location and extent to which grading will take, place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. 2) A statement fron a .. registered ngineer supported by data factual substantiating: sky subsurface exploration and gepteth ical engineering report b) The validity of sanitary sewer• and storm drainage seruiice proposals c) That all Problems will be mitigated and how they Will be mitigated D) Arcs: ; ..ectiiraS rawi.....: s loo. of co" ie The site dvelopment plan ProPosal shall include: 1) iloor plans indicating the sguare footage or all 1 strOotures pr oposed for use on —site; and 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure. E) 1.andscapePlan (No. f copies,.. be drawcal.e ifr�necessar� le cif the , The landscape plan shall sca site a sly is plan or a lat er s y and shall 1) Description Of the irrigation system .where applicable ' 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and creenings APP C. �NEtk1IST Page APPLICATION APPLICATION LEGIBILITY '6) Lion of terraces, decks, s"e1t.? play arel s and common open spaces' :] 4) Location, type, site and species of existing and proposed plant material:., [ ] The landscape plan shall ; include a g arrative which addresses 1) soil conditions. 1 3' 2) Erosion control measures thiat t)i11, be used. E 3. S�qn Drawir . Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18. 114 of the Code as pa► art o1; Site Development Review or prior to obtaining ing a Building PeIrnit to construct the sign. [ ] Traffic< generation estimate H) PrelifiinNrt e2Etition cr' lot 1 at yustM2nt mag shourlc�, ilft� b �+�. (No. of Dories ) a 1) ._...�.wa,.,. ) i«e owner O f the subject Parcel 2) The owner's authorized agent 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet 1) , inch north arrow and date, 4) Description of parcel lbcat;ian arid boundaries 5) Location, width and names �f streets, easemnts: and, other public ways within and adjacent to the parse 6) Location of all, permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of ' all property lines 7) Location and width of all water courses A) Location of any trees with 6'b or greater caliper at 4 feet abovo ground level All slop et gr••eater than '25%. Location of existing• utiilit.es relt For major land p artition which createsa public rnstreet: a) The proposed right-of -way location and width b) A scaled cross- sfaction of the proposed street plus any reserVe strip 121 Any applicable deed rostr°ic1 ions 13) Evidence that land r titrir w` �� .o will not preclude efficient future land dit isian where applicable Smbd.ivision Prelimanary Plat I!a„p and data sboiwini (NVo. of Copies 1) scale equaling 30, 50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and 1ioited to one phase per sheet 2) The proposed �� the subdisiretast;�anshz osed name of th 3) Vicinity map s owing proper y p to arterial and collector streets 4) Names, addresses telephonenumb` numbers of the owner developer, engineer, surveyer, deli her, as applicaktYet'a 5) bate of application 6) Bourrdar: ( lines of tract 10 be. s..:bdivided .. Ce Names 'of *adjacent'. siubdivisit 'rti .��, a >� ...... aoo� off° names of recorded owners of adjoining Parcels cif. unsubdivided land ) Contour lines r ' Cane elated to a Cat" esta�bl�.hed -krerti mark at 2 -foot intervals for 0 -10 %'s cad ts greater than 1a C] C] t APPLICATION CNEC L ST Page 3 J M• 9) The P+irpose,, location, ; type . and size of all 6t , the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision) e; a) Public and rivate P . right-of-ways and easements b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines b' s va�e� s )4 Domestic water mains including fire hydrants d) Major power telephone trrrios:ission lines (60,000 volts or greater) C e) Watercourses 3 f) ®eed reservations for parks, open space, Pathways and, other land encumbrances C ) 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed "anitar "y and storm sewers with gretdes and pipe, sizes indicated 11) Plan of the proposed winter distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of rouses and fire hydrants. 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of ,the proposed subdivision. 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way; t 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow 15) Location, Width and direction of flow of all water- courses and drainage ways 1 3 16) The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where losts are .to be Purposes other than residential, it shall be , �ddea;ter d �ap �ons suthldts r in ) The location of all trees With a diameter er° 6' inches or greater measured. at 4 feet above ground level, and the 'location of proposed trey plantings, if any 18) The existing uses of the property +, including' the location of all structures. and tint present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) b) • Proof of property ownership c) A proposed plan for provision 0,f,,'10bijision improvements 20)` i tin , natural features including r tk out g croppingsk wetlands and Marsh areas. 21) If any of the foregoing . information cannot, practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorPoratod into a narrative and submitted with the application. • J) Other nfortma+ti on (2362P/0028P) APPLT ATIO CNttKL�isT Pale 4 November 14 is 991 Victor Adonr � Dev. Asesst Planner cnannua ty Development Dept. City of Tigard P0 BOY, 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 RECEIVED NANNING NOV 1 5 1991 RECEIVED N ANNING NW/ 151991 Mr, Morin: Enclosed you will find a rough draft of the plan to subdivide the property located at 11375 SW' 90th Avenue in Tigard. d. We have a scheduled lire- . application meeting next Tuenday,, Novenlber 19, 1991 aW 10:00 A.M. Mr President to Palmer, of Alpha Engineering, Inc., h� requeited that Mr. rrt Jemmy Offev and Mr. Chris Davies also be present at the ;meeting, Mr. Palmer will also be present at the meeting. y. ,h! p p. the it �s a� drawing. �d�esY� to � lit tlxe � ,� anto four sse aratc rotas, as shoe. sn tl The existing hone already h access off SW 90th Avenue. � The property .. .p " t. - ,. ` � the be accessed way of hr�eee iota �n tl�e back o� ¢he ate planned to SW 91st Court, which abutta the north side of the subject property!, Please note that a "modified hammerhead" culdesac is sho an the ion of Mr. a full 53' radius required . . . Palmer. ��hn�r. were aeq drawing at the sweat to finish out the bulb of the cuidesac, then the center tot of the aubdr vision would be lost due to front and back setback requirements. Should you require any other documentation for the planned .meeting, please call me at '626 -460 or leave a message on my home phone at 639-5701. 'hankyou i, Craig Siler • p. • .1 1 NUN ■■ aw1■■ NMI ■ ■. inami■A. r :� +�Ni:� �'■ i■ AMAM■A�■ b�� `i i E I ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■■ X raiillIm ■ t■■uma ■■i�■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■it■ as rim , ■ L'�11ILI i. ■■■r■M _ #■'!iiiiiUL ■ MP ■■■■■mmmaaa;a■aa ■ aaa ■1 1a■■m` �Y, `a ic'.� ■�, ;;�i :•: ■ ■ ■■ a■ ■ Al a maims p ■ M ii aat I ■y is map mum pm • mom !!IIIILII1NJII!!I1J11! i � 111 ail ./ tea NM �� �► ai _' ■ a ii :;iiiI1i!r4II1II:iiiiIIIIIii i ■■i■■.■ ■ . iiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIII' .. ■ ,.t ■■■ ■■■� ■a ■■ �. a■ ■!N�` . I1F�; ME■ ■■ ■■■■ At: C <<` ■■ r, a ■■i aaaa � a ■1 ■N a ■■ ■ ■■■ ■■ . a a as ■ ■� IN�� ' �� / raN ■r■ ■■ ■■■ aaa■ ■■■aaaa/�k MN■■a�iuwai ■■ a `Walt . L ` h ■ = m ■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■mmaN a MIN • ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■M 4t ■ a■■■i■■A>fa mit ■■■■4 - ■ ` ■■ a■ ■■ ■■ ii■■■ ■ ■■'■ ■a ■■■ ■ ■.a■ ■a.■.■b ■ ■� a ■■� ..aa. ■a ■ a ■aia as i■ ■■■■■■ �m■ ■aaa ■ .,1 ■ ■/� a aka Caa a IM ■■■■■■ ■■ 0. ■ ■ ■■r; �, .M ■ a aIMMEM N ■ MUM � a ■. ■a� � I ■. miclmm mimm m mm 1111:1. immmm aa � . iw MN ■ maims ■■ M Q wt, aami` ■A� ■a ■�-` 1111 MIN MN MN ■■■. aiiiaiam a.! ■a■ MN� a ■ai Irr�� ■1�rA�11■ ■ TIMMIT 1r1 ■plr A aFINNIF �i � :MMN ■■III ■■■ ■ . / MAIM .a_ill � ■ 'aa -, • ■ ■ ■a as ■■ iI!iiihiIILiIi • ■ ■ aaa _ ■ a . ■ 11111! ■ ■a as Illm 1 n 1 ■ 1 ell igillis ■ a iii ,a 1 r�! • Mimi■■ ■■■ Ga 'a MUM ■aaua■■:aa■ ■■ ■ , ■■■■■ * • HMO ■ ■aI■ WON I :MINN t INIIINSMI ■■�a aaia ■i■aa ii ■ unman m a ab ■ as ■ ■ a■ ■■ ■■ mill■ '1■ • , ■h mill a s ■ ■ ■■ ■a aataa■fam /■■ F ■■, ■ i"ma■II■■a ■a■■u■■aaa■ ■iA'> tim a mumps �a/a ■a waaa■■ ■a mom a pumps ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■a ■1�■ ■am 111 a a a■ ■ AMA MINN ■� t � ■i 117 ■ IMP: I aI■ ■AI ■■ ■ , In milimM s O" is ■ ti NiiohiiiIIIiIIIIJi ■ ■ ■ ■m mpg a■!a ■ ■: /■ ■ 1M■ M IONE II MN MOM* II jIiJIIIIiiiiIIIOpIIi: ■.: m 111116111 µ ■ ■ am MINI ■ r ■ ■ a • aa■aAl ■■ I ■�. a ■ -���m ■ m■a •■�= ■■ MN Eli ■ a aA■I ■ ■a/ mom■■ a■ ■ ■ ■ Pt ■■N . Pa t ■■ E3 SJ■■ ■a.■ ■a■ ma ■aaa ■ t■ ■■■ 111` i ■A1r■■ ■■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■ „ ■a a■■■C1 • ■ . ■a .a ■■II ■■■ i . • ■■ ■ ■ 1 , ■IMAM ■mo i mm m C,.A.�i� .. , E`'.■ �m.i�■m • ail. • ■ ■ ■1�41i .11l■■ ■a AI■■■■ ■ ■■■ ■ 1111 . , ■� ■a■ SUN ■i a ■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■.1■ 0 w . ■ ■ u■■■■ r:. m as a ■aaa■ a ...1._: lip a a �1 /A� ■ ■m■ 11111111111 ■ a Ali ■* ■■ a ■a ■a■ !!. J : ■ ■■ ■ ■1■a11.�� aaM■ N as ■ ■a a i as ■■■i■■■i . ■ is M. .0,. aaa a ■MEM lrniIIJlHInuIiII yaw mi " ". 1■ii�aaa maa ■� iii ■■N1A1■ ■wN / 11111 . .11111.1111 1111. 0 100 d5•aG60 Ej ; ,I1 . /Al I i,ti, , 11 '' 1 S , ,1 � 1.1441 t p ; ��r1'sti1ri►a �• • ,r ',ill Plow Hi 1h4! Joi i''1 g •Hie ti 114YLi ee• Ra ti 'yi ' 1 PU$L?.7 X90 ; r 1' p�y. 4 ..r ww• e' ►. rw ',r .l 4 nits° eto 4r 1 r1 t �y I �""v' ` 1 _"" nYyl. l r l' r ' � r (/r ( I , r� :5 Ir r 1 r� Ij 1 6 1.. ' A '11�r .a� iYt Y1 N j. �''ll'rr///��, 1 �Ii 1, + �r .. I 1 o f1f:l't"1P)�Is ,t (i, kt . B � ;�1 (I�1i.11 61 I �tl+,,i , .I' n� rf' �, 1 ''I • '�.. ,'i I r l I I� I i - r r e 1 re \, I H1 .' It V%% .t • '''H'1'.:l ,f..,�,,1 I..�� Il '�� 1Y. c1 Ir..I�AA i ,P +l :! , +' , Zo ill �� -. -(( r t�' +I .� �. Ir�t1Yi r� -I WI 11 �. townungi A .pro; '' 24 Q j ` II I. �° I ,dye Vt . j ,r Yin r r 1ti',i I� i �'a 1. , V� ,' ' \'! . , ' r 17.4 b lss� "�' p'� \ '� I y'I t tl I �� 0 I tj�lI,, r. H « .. ., . r� i�r dty�( 11.1,.', rq,,, 1l';.w , 4 x`1!' ''1 ' ;1 I . t.ik, l' ! o ,,,,rf( r ;•,�1 ;1'� 5n, � .' ,tii. -.' I C" i !F..uss 999...Lsa�saaa y b .i. '. �4f (1 r i,1 � — +I : � t aII +r ' . {l+ ( e1 I , '4, '-,1. �I / I, � r ' ,' „� t r I r ' r 'i .., •I '..M ''� r 1 , a ' I, ' . , i � V '� ,{ � r u t y r • ,+lr; ,. �j !,1I n',• �i_ I , ., 'J ' l t m iY j l � r ) lJ. 4 (j' �/ Y I`� r lr 1 • � 1, 1 4.1';'• : ,00� ' „n ‘ };� r " + I11 .; e.. ~°r= iY .( \ Ir zd I i�Br , .... ' (011060•1 • 1y Ar 1i�E 7 !:011. - 1011. l . 1 11 t till., 110 Al 11,,:,t NN 0 , +1.; �. y, Ilio y` ,,' 4 1' , r,, ".1'11' W �, 'f D. T/ 1 1 '1 Y jv'7/ 7 , 1 I , 111'�1��j (r111 M i i I. 1111q 1 q ,I' ! 1,1., X11 111 �� i 1l i M 1 1 l 11. (I' . u� 11 �'��� fl�sll��lh�I, 'ij; ,i��,�'IIII' I'! rG I” I .'. Trri..lwrM11: RV {ULi1Mat1 qJ,l M 4° / N� 1 � W 1 A fi EPLA �; + r °'HAZEL 'HILL IN 7iE J� L. �IIG,'CLIN D.L. ': No. 54 1/4,' ECT1ON 35, T.1 S., Rr,1 N►a ; W.Iv1. ''ITY. OF figR�RD, WASH /NGTON .'cOL'NTY, OREMGG FE'F'R11ARY 8, 1901 SCALES 1' 56' PR L!JIIIN4 ?Y I; A,' 81 04347000 ,uon r' ry 119�."egh e I ( 1' NON AR ACCESS smlp I.35. 8 44.93 ° Lot 12 7909 SF p 14 !Qg <�4'oo° 329.5' (P)( �A.I ;$29,.,; 45.0T' .1 120.00°€ k--1 4 , , , , . ., o 1' 49' f' NON VEISlt +R 1 ACCESS ..1IP 1 1n ° Lol i i 7947 S1' • d. ', 1v 89'34'00 °' --...,..........----.....-----r.............1 � 1, 9,3:►'—' -- I L ®l` 2 7,999- V 89 °,14'OAe Maar �INInAL POINT. h rNO.271'.1NIR,rE POIAtT • to° • 1' I u) M i l %950 :,1' '''. e• 10 ,. , I iv 69,'34'00' I � �3�.u1 t j e L' o ?' 4 H r,' 7. �0A S,' N 69'J4'00' 1'37.20' Lots I"t 7800 s' N 89•34'OQ .� 4,53I'" 1.36.48' I. `-"'` 18.1;3'' i 409.! SF , Nr 69 °34'00" 139.50' L 8 7903 SF 14 1 ;1 ' N 89 °34'004 • ..: - »139,50' ,5;89 i_ ' � o I I /kJ/ 13 01E10 5/0°7 '-- -- , INSIDE 1 -P/ `IP 0.4'A0,3 ' OF MIN LINK FENCE ,OR, p�uv.0 w 111.50' 1o1Jrhf itJ s '89 `49OO° IS' PKiVA:n` sron DR/41N EASEMEI ti l qi r.; a IR f 01�J FROM. 11NE) i ' 326; OENr yelp 124S,d29� LOT CURYE DATA; 1 -f i2''1P, t1.11SIi 0:50W42.33'E 1; t T R.4UIus O:LTA . LENCTI " ... BEARING : CH q .. 1 c�0 00', 90.11 'S9' 31 49" $. 44'28'00' lV E� 23' 6 ?!I 00'. 51.• .'3 • :18' 3 S�, 26.36'17 , E_,..: 2f 6 5:Jj !0'. 52'23.36 4m° 47 1. S,' 6'2 '40' E 461 7. . 53 r Poi, 51. 9'30' 19.63 i25' 3'49' 6 46. 95' 20 00' 51' . '39' .1 :13': «N,t'`• ' ?.' �' 52 '. 12 20r 00' 09'4 :!a ° 1:35 ,N4ur32'00 N x0 '3�'„ win 7 t T R.4UIus O:LTA . LENCTI " ... BEARING : CH q .. 1 c�0 00', 90.11 'S9' 31 49" $. 44'28'00' lV E� 23' 6 ?!I 00'. 51.• .'3 • :18' 3 S�, 26.36'17 , E_,..: 2f 6 5:Jj !0'. 52'23.36 4m° 47 1. S,' 6'2 '40' E 461 7. . 53 r Poi, 51. 9'30' 19.63 i25' 3'49' 6 46. 95' 20 00' 51' . '39' .1 :13': «N,t'`• ' ?.' �' 52 '. 12 20r 00' 09'4 :!a ° 1:35 ,N4ur32'00 N x0 '3�'„ 4 CITY OF 'TTIGARt3 Washington County, o»egon NOTICE OF FINAL MRDER - Dx HEARINGS OF7)Icln, ▪ Concerning Dace .Number (s ) s-& a ®21, /d9►R 9 . -SDI 1 ,—,.., -., _. -.,« • Kane of Coiner: .. ;, h , nth; i 8i1 ®r Name of Applicant: Meant: Same � .. .e...s.,...4... .--- Addree a MILD, D, 90th y . (2 -�. �o zip 511.2-2-3—.... ih Avenue City �r� • Address of Property: 11.3 5 SW 90t Avenue Tax Map and Lot No().: 1S1 353E tax. lot 2601 • Reg nest: ,4..�..a. -_,... y re £e va to divi4 s oaxc ®1 +f A r�a+��aeet fog Sasbdivieio as ox:rova • ,. ., ot�4 betty seE r oxicn • �~ • 4�3 9 ecru ,o fours 1 A4 50 0 ar d 1® ®57 aB$re_ £e, et, each 1►lao occ ueeted 3 pTroval to �alio a modified cul-d�e� -ea NF: �� riance a R-4.5 (Residential 4.5 unite acre The R-4.5 zone a wl_g ngle 1 . l appARd r e . 2u0 • A art it to ion treti nt hLo Pi• f manufactured homes famil da care hom oc aat ane . . temooay use and residential fuel tanks ackorer the urea • • AW7. ion a, � Approval with ond�,e�an t: Denial : the newspaper, posted at City Hall, No• m Notice was published in and tailed to The X 0 nes t ofrecorddwithin the required distance :: applicant The affected Neighborhood Plannin,Y OrgsnizatiOn __K__ Affected agencies . Final Decision THE DZ.CISION SHALL En FINAL ON UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILVD. The adopted findings of fads; decision, and etatecnent of Conditions can be obtain from233e7plTigard, b; pa en722T3 Tigard City Hall, ' 13125 SW Hall, P.O. , o on znay . PPp!�6:32 i ;'� decision .. in patty and �.l this cecia ®n 9. �ppe�� Any p tC� 'Lila decision accoidance with 18,32.290(Z; d Section �l provided gnat' a en appeal ay be filed within 10 days after nc ice is given tind sent. The appSal May be eubtit* +forms on City for a. *s. to cco panie�dim y� the^+a pee ($315.001‘ an5cript coetd (varies to r al fee and t� '` i� The deadline for filing of appeal tt 3' 30 P p. ..�. ?Y. 10. ia,ge.qtiohtt you .: . y questions, o' call tic City of Tigard If have ari pi.a+a 13P...a �lamPlanning e " ar�i.anentr P3� - 4171. bk /SUB910.4.9 rn i4 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON Codnty► of Washington City of Tigard I, atAL,e.„4, Klit-thAUX depose atid say: ( Please print) y% D ® c Tigard, Oregon. served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: served NOTICE OF DECISION FO - City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Oo imistion --_-,Tigard Hearings Officer - Tigard City Council, A coil* (Pt bIL:: Bearing ayotice /Notice of Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named attached list marked exhibit "B=° on they said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto bullet .n txr );card on the ..�.v W.__. day of w -,r4 in th0 Vnited StateB Nail on the Postage prep aid. Depiaion) of which id ,bttaohed (erred por,sons at the aaddres�� shown a�n the ..,.. day of t�.%t JC.; 19 4T Attached, was posted on ark appropriate 19 ., ; and deposited day of Prepared Lotion Posted For Decision _ Orr gibed y R'a,+orn /affirm to Me on the r r• day o NOTARY PUBLIC OF . GON _.._ My CoaameisSion Expired: Per o' r. ho delivered to POST OFF/CE 19 • bribed and sworn /aff;' rav to me on the N T I C t:: OF PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, Januelir 2, AT 7.00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD,, TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: SQB 91- 0019 /VAR 91 -0021. FILE TITLE: Sher APPLICANTS:. Stephen C Cynthia Siler 11375 SW 90th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Orville & Lois Siler 3275 Brush College Road Salem, OR 97304 NPO NO: 2 OWNERS: Saute AGENT: Randy Ciarno Alpha Engineering 9600 SW Oak S -230 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEM SUBDIVISION SUB 91 -0019 VARIANCE VAR 91 -0021 SILER A request for Subdivision approval to divide a 1.12 parcel into four lots between 8,500 and 18,057 square feet in size. Also requested is Variance approval to allow a modified cul -de -sac bulb. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code C:hvptere 18.50, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18.10,, 18.114, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.154; Comprehensive Plain: Policies 2.1.1, 4,2.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. LOCATION: 11375 SW 90th Avenue (WC TN 1SI 35DB, taX lot 2601) ZONE: R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units acre) the R -4.5 zone allows dingle detached family r siderrntialtr atment h mes, farmitj, manufactured homes, facilities, r P support family day care, home rz'Aupatione, temporary uses, and residential fuel tanks among other used. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18 a 32 OP THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPNBNT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18630. AN Nt WISHINd TO PRESENT WRITTEN ... ........ ... PRIOR 3tiEN TESTIM0��3C on THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY D® �:�0 IN WRITING PFIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT TY�, � � e ��� . T THE PUBLIC OPEN THE PUBLIC WILL RECIEVE A TEE PUBLIC HEARING A, LIC STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM! THE ; AR/NO; AND !iVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEAR/AGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE .ACTION APPLICATION: OR CLOSE NCE _. ON T . OBTAIN OE BAN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO ' IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF '.'H FiEARING. IF THEREIS�NC CONTINUANCE GRANTED D TO APPLICATION � AT THE PARTICIPANT Q THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN HCARTNG, LEAST SEVEN DAYS IN THE NEr�4,RINf� MAY REQUEST THAT T '" OPEN FOR AT LE AFTER THE HEARING INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LEST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FPOM THE TIGARD COMpLDNIT! DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING ING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO '1C'rIE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSN IN PERSON 011 BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF ` THE HEARING O: TM REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION DER All OPPORTUNITY SO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND 1388 BOARD OF APPEALS PHASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN MEE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COLT OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO ;ME !MARINO, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR � 1 S PER PAGE. INSPECTION AT NO COST, Oil A ��DPY C�AtiN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PS�A ' PA FO1 FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT TEE STAFF PLANNER, 5arrry .Offer, AT 63E- 4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) # 2 CHAIRPERSON: Ed Duffield PHONE NUMBER: 639-4759 iijii°i i°io i aip Wiiil ii°p111i 1y i1i Eiiy ii 1i ;ir Yiilirtii 3ujti- 111i c(1j ufiiitar liii - iitIiii jiiir°pii'fiip II , On►.li Millid ii 1i (iili eil iiilii 444 ... � .._w.a liklitf fbiiJi; i .. 111 (1,e)6i144) ,r►. w 4 W Nye:' 613,;' .314 CRTLA tD OR 97204 11n35DB -00100 .4... .............. SCHAr.YER, HARRY E LILLIAN 11245 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD. CML 97223 1S135D841O300 . e . .. . • . • . , .. a o TUND &Re MICHAEL / KATHARIN4 TUNDERr TONY 14 / PAULA H % JAOOBY a VALERIE 4(027 SE 14TH PORTLAND q OR 972'G2 1S135DB. -01800 ..................... O' CALLAGHAN, COLIAEMN C 17780 OVERLOOK CI4"tCLE LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 '109 TRANSPOR TION :SALEM ORr1� 10 1S135DB0-0O20 .........• . • `INTZ Q ROBS tX N ROSE 11275 SW' 90TaAVE- TIGARD CR 07223 1S138DS -00400 LAMB, PATSY 11475 SW 9GTn TIGARD OR 97223 1S135DB- 002000 r ......./.......,... HEINTZ, ROBERT ET AL 11275 SW 90TH A TIGARD OR 9722 1S135DB-01900:eaoao.oa.io . rssio.ia MCHORSE, MICHAEL CORIE AND MICHELE LYNN 11440 SW 91ST AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 1 3 5 D a " . 1 21OO e••• d e o e w. a i s.• o.• i• o HEINTZ, . .0 §BR AL 11275 SW 99 AVE TIGARD 97223 1S135DB -02200 ....eo..Ve.o•sa•eeds. HEINTZ, ROBERT 11275 SW 90 VE TIGARD + ' 97223 1S '/335DB-- 02400.. • .. e • ,j ■ • .... w .. e e HEINTZ ROBERT ET ,AL 11275 SW 90Nc AVE TIGARD 97223 1S135DB -02300 ............ •dd... HEINTZ, ROBE ET AL 11275 SW AVE TIG OE 97223 1S 13535D -+ 2 O2 4 0. 4 4 4 4 DH 50a •.d•w•rer•esdd. HEINTZ, ROBERT ET AL 11215 SW 90TH TIGARD gip' 97223 1S135DB•.02600 .ad.q:md•e......a.n e REITTZR9 BECKY LEE 11405 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 15135D0- 02612 44444444,4'4444444 s.. .e FADLK, JEFIF DOROTHY N 11435 SW 90 TIGARD • OR 91223 1S135DB -02603 :4.■444.Addee.e■.e.4. LILJA►s L YLE V AND GEORGIA S 11401 SW 90TH TIGARD OR 91223 161i5DB -02700 •444..4 onNdo..dad.c DYKEN p ROY JOSEPHINE 11435 SW 91ST AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1513508 -03700 ... ....',. ... 444. KOLHODIN, NORMA ** MARY Lou er d.e ". bii s4 deeo 1Si:i6DB. -02604 ..................0.. LILJJ , LYLE V GEORGIA. S 11401 SW 90.' 'T:GARA) 97223 1513514,02800 • e o e 4 '0 d a d ... a.• i o 4 • 4 .' SANDBO, JOHN R AND DONNA N TRAiDBA4 DONNA hi`, 11475 Sid' 91ST TIGARD OR 9722:3 �1o+A J4 DD °O+a 1a •" s. a. 640006000000 d w.. C.°RAI DA ID 0 AND VICE. A •11420 sW 92sb 15135DB -03900 •or�rs••eu•• GIROD PAUL/NE lC. PO BOX 23215 TIGARD OR 97223 ISX35DB -04100 •ee••,•ra�oee�reaaew• aux, JOSEPH H 11330 SW 92ND TIGARD OR 97223 1 q ,p cy /�y S135D3 -04200 e.•••. ... .... •••ee WILSON, BEATRICE BENNETT WILSON, HOOVER GAYLOR SR 11270 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1S1350B- 04500 ..................... VANDENBOSOH, WENTWORTH P ELIZABETH PI 11345 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 15135M- 04601 . e .. • e ,, to • JOHNSON, VIRGII. D JOYCE L 11375 SW 92ND TIGARD on 97223 1S135DB -04000 • •.•.••♦ to • 0 do to a BOWERSOX, KARL C GRACE E 11360 SW 92ND TIGARD OR 97223 e1$1355DB�q- 0t101p 0 s.. �e qr� ;tea •. +� .CR NDALL, PRISCILLA X1.1 11300 SW 92 NB AVE TIGARD OR 97223 .0.00000 XSI35DA -02702 „a•weoo•.•.s•0... .... NESS, $3AROLU W DORIS A 11230 SW 90TH TIGARD OR 97223 15135DA -02801 .•:.•. ........ srQ M TAGGART, BRENT & KATHRYN ANN 11280 SW 90TH k4ENUE TIGARD OR 1SI35DA -02801 • e a • . • e • d • • . o e e . d . • 0 h RAYNES, JAME$ W' VIRGrNTA E 11200 SW 90TH AVE TIGAR0 OR 97223 1S13508 -04400 e.•o0••sea.•.- oa••a•0 WILD IANSON, cHERYY. L % SODEROUIST,, BRAD B AND DAWN MARIE 21266 BEACH BLVD #103 HUNTINGTON BCH CA 96243 15136q p C DB -04600 •• r•ss »• ..•.s•o a• at GLAUBEE JOHN A ! MARY MARTHA CO TRUSTEES 11405 Si 92ND PORTLAND OR 97223 1S135DA- 02701 ...........0......... BROYLES, l8 KENNETH BNNIE A 11260 SW 90TH TIGARD OR 9722, IS135DA-02800 0•..,..•....,.... ... BLEVINS a GLOVER Q ANNA E 11330 SW 90TH TIGARD OR 9722 151350A -02802 •i••••••'r•ses.•.waass HUNTER, ROBERT BRUCE AIM ESTHER D 11300 SW 90TH TIGARD OR 97223 1S135DAa02900 ....... JD) G, MARTIN MARIA 11400 SW 90TH TIGARD OR 97223 e e b!•. a d•' �eq yC /q /p 1S135DA -03100 ..••eoes. ••. SNYDER, WILL ANA T PUGH# STEPHANIE 11480 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD O t 97223 a• it 1S13u1041°'tia200 it e s 0• •.0 • S 0 d 0 e to •• w iY. •`a DOLL THOMAS C AND DORIS H 11500 SW 90TH TIGARD OR 97223 1SI350D -03602 .• r �. .•o•.• o WORSECI , H14R ®LIT A. SANDRA R 114 ' 0 sW 9�'TB TIG19RD Olt 91223 1S1351DD -03603 •..e ..m• sea,a.. GOSHOW, ELIgA►BRTi7i I :11425 SW LOUITA AVE TIGI ► GR 97223 411565 SSW 91.ST TIGARD : OR , 97223 1S135DB- 0370 0 ' ... * . KOLMODIN, NORMAN B MARY )rdou 11450 •SW 92ND TIGARD OR 97223 '-a 1G135D8- -0380 • rt' a. • • • ........ CRAIG, DAVID ?I VICKI R 11420 .SST. 92ND TIGARD 15135DA.-03000 C & BARBARA G 0t E' 11405 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD OR 97223 STEPHEN & .CYNTHIA SILER 11375 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 ORVILLE ;'fig LOIS SILER 3275 BRUSH COLLEGE ROAD SALEM OR 97034 RANDY CLARNO ALPHA ENGINEERING, INC. P' , SW Obi SUITE 230 efLANb OR 97223 ED DUF 'IELD 8895 SW EDCEWOOD TItiARD OR 97223 S Zl M$'0;* TT' ti ;MA cam aUA GI ' ' ii fTefp1•0®o 000EO'"M0a5STSh MO T6 MS jLt'tt' V2200 alOMWRIML Mr vwaaoa amv u NMOr ao5!aLL�T'bs' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00990- asgi TOar ZZL6 go UUW g4 ••ZO6 MS TO,Tt S, VX0V .40 Ofglif A a m "VL"XI'I� 4 • o • • a • p • • p 0 p o . P , • R • . �/VTJ40 ®S�o.1 G� h : - '4z4(.0 IO pp�� gii'ioxa O6 AS SVtt 1. $' A 'IX011O( altar 'U7l'tiil4 p . o ... n . • a . . a .. 4 4Q9Z0°°SliS£TSt ZZL6O ... .OIL, A & ZO6 4S SLtt 1 &N vL�i ISO i 4 �A T I w••� \- w•• p g• e p o a o o• p p d. OCIS CO-SCStERt EZZL6 110 U NOLL 2A.V MX06 Ms 6L ?tt 'fit I2 HO i '' 2XMIR ( o *q• pa,gporpp•p•op•• ooLG®riiv,��G Ls gezL6 Ixo adveix I4t6 Ms SEPT 22X2dlssO 24 X®R 'NVwa x ° OOLE®-SageTS1 £ZZL6 HO g. Well. 11106 MS tQV'tt s vIsuOSO ably A N'TA'I 'VL'I:I1 o••p•a •••p•eo'9• 9.0• EQ9Z0-SaSETS.1. EZ0•66 UO OuVoiW Mf MXXe0e6 MS SOKt 227 r. • Q • QI i . i O • a a p i OH O 9 . • QO9 O- fGSEtst 'w ZZL6 go auvoIX AY 0�Q6, ms SLZTT 'Iv LS S;uauo t�7 T I�IeI 3 ro••o•.•noy 00tgo' -Sas tot EZZL6 U0 oatIVOIX 2AV MI06 MS SLZtZ xa xgrAgOu Q� !J1�g' I' 1E♦i • . • *. a . O . • • . • • • !•. • . 00ZZO -sasE 7 st • . a Y• • CWZW6 UO OtVt SA;V H100 Ms S5t xu�gso�t ' zINIza ¶ZZL6 UO QP'its.%X "�11►V 47�SY6 M� O Y 4 `` Z w 7VOI$. ativ '1siiHDIM� 4' 0!. 110H0Y�i ••C...s•••o••••• O06 0,..aaSCtst • • • • • • ♦ • • • Z 4 6 HO 011DIL 5AV H106 MS SLZtt 7,1 G5 dUSU ob A ZJ NI II tl • • a .. ... Q003O°i1Q!attst £ZL6 V0 0 €OTS', 06 MS 6L$tt 4014V7; p OSte0c`aas t %dt tEOL6 330 O02MSO Win crn1/0 Mex lt0 QSLLt omarioo a L ►Y'tf'(LVO!�Qe0' r • r a r a . • r • . /o�r•� Ja fir+ • OO8t0,,,�S 1S tST ZOZL6 litalgT4°014: al) irA 4;6004r % %t tritaVit /w MCA 'KaaMI 'Nt3I1U / lav'rmt glrEaNflJ, • • e a • •, • • • • -• • • • • • OC .00-SaS'r''tst CZZL6 ;U0 a2avoim' 2AV MX06 NS 5LZtT ssoa M �ttaao$q ' Z X2K Y':�I • • • :O . • .• 0000-sUSttst V tE 45 !Q )lira' Ns Oath: UOIXVXU0dSMVUX 00t -MO '4 /t % EZZL6 YO 0UVOIX NAV 11106 MS SbiXT Nyl'rlP 0 zannmil Q''usol �►TYO'/s' . a • . • • ootoo�Saic ST *0E1.6 1O ativIUtIOd ,ZL .S'S SM ONE ; MS OS 00 XMO2 522010 42 re w 1813.5D8.03900 .. .. 0..000100 G TROD, PAUL/NR L PO BOX 23215 TIGARD OR 97223 1S135DBa0410O .. e....s.a...... DUI, JOSEPH 11330 SW 9tND TIGARD OR 97223 ••• 1S135DB'440C 1jaee•.owori DOWERSOX, K , 0 GRACE 2 11360 SW 92ND TIGARD OR 97223 1S135D3 -04200 • ..:. ...o.•i• p • WILSON, BEATRICE 'BE!Nl! ETT WILSON, HOOVER GAYLOR SR 11270 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD OR ` 97223 1S135DB °04500 . d e . • ... • a ... d . it ... • VANDENDOSCH, WENTWORTH P ELIZABETH X 11345 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD Og 97223 1S135DB -(4601 e.e..s..e•...dde•0•er. JOHNSON, VXRGIL D JOYCE L 11375 SW 92ND TIGARD OR 97223 1S135D&-02702 ............... I NESS, HAROLD W DORIS A 11230 OW 90T TIGARD OR 97223 1S135DA -02801 .o•,reoe•.•a••. MCTAGGART, BRENT KATHRYN ANN 11280 SW 90TH ` AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 1S135DA -02 €03 . 3 ... • 0 .. 0.0 .. 3 .. e . • HAYNES y JA4E1S W VIRGINIA E 11290 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD OR 1223 1S135DA -03100 •'e...e...dbil•ee..dde. SNYO2R, WILLIAM T PUGH, STEPHANIE 11480 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD OT%, 07223 1S135611 03602 WORS8. 8 y� �� 0i � dT �0tt? A SAhdDRU 11451 5W 40TH TIGkRO OA 912 ;3 SOO* 041 1S135D8-04101 ••ee•t!'••re•u•s.w�• CRANDALL, PRI$CILLA 3 1.1309 t3W 92ND AVM TIGARD OR 97223 1S135D5- 04400 *e• e.•o..e•...... W4ILLIAMS0 I, CHERYL L SODERQUIST, BR,D E AND DAWN MARIE 21266 BRACE BLVD *103 HUNTINGTON . BCH' 96248 18135D844600 ... .. e . • i.e..... O e GLAUD , JOHN A 3 ';',1;441( MARTHA 11405 , SW 92ND PORTLAND OR 97223 1S135DA i,02701y aq� e{� apA e e•• s s a e • s ee .s e o a BROV1 CtS, M i ENNE 0.37{ JENNIE A 11260 SW 90T'H, TIGARD OR 97223 1S135DAi.02800 ............... e s u BL VINS, G OVER Q Pd111N . . 1130 SW 90TH' TIGARD OR 97223 11813510"4/2 +0g .o.eese " eptcrsecistea HUNTER, ROBERT ERUCE AND ESTNER ; 11300 St 90TH TXGARD OR 97223 181380A—',''.900 es•s..sesesae•�i.e•e•e JUNG, MARTIN MARIA 11400 SW 90TH T/GARD OR 97223 1S1350A,- 03200 .n.IK'oo•e. b.eob••sil•e DOLL, T'HOM S C AND DORIS D; 11500 SW 90TI TIGARD OR 97223 �1pS. L�7yyAu�JDD'"�013 03 i °al o a ii b• b s d A b m ,a e e 4' a o O. "e ti414AG5 8.11 LOM1TA' AVE /,IFIt 14 tD OR 97223 d FLOWER RONALD C & JANIC 1155.5Be4 91' TIGARD OR 97223 �r1SA R .. 11460 SW' 92 ' SIaRitb OR 97223', 0 • • 18135D8 -03800 a06•• 030•0•i•.�,8••'r•, 1�135i98�- 03�'�ci o.•�•e•a•a••••ve•�ep ROLMM!)IN, NORMAN B ORAIG, DAVID N AND VILTI R MARY LOU 11420 5 i 92NO 11450 SW 92ND TIGAW5 OR ' 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 , hl '1' 8a r 0 4 1 lU r p,,, • .r .v la 0 ig criNi... w. .. <00. 4 Ic.� 0.Z_ 0 ° ;2 0:0 i ...s.,.,.,dl�..wrs.r�n.. e--- lseellraw -- •�....ue.n...- _.._.. 9911 :Oh J i i /may / /.S�lr % % // J /I Ay/ / ✓// r// is Q! �r7 /rid /i!/. /i. /// iYirerilMi /�.•ii/�i i.... r. 4R. '#)240 %),'"' ✓ / / ///k *'1400 /hrtt6Vii4,ir•r' Oil Kat OA 41.99 II*G6 fete 6a "141 1691 J i yF ' 9, 0 gl is • 6'C• 1 4'i(il sees �, < an N3AV 4S16 '' • at cm . °. is qt ;' OB 4 6g p tV gee. 1 �© . se E i r /rni %fin' ;077Aeofjoj/"' 111 to Asa t '' a ,to a0 s CS 4.10 4n rr• ' I 0t �3'I;10 M'�lf 17.1:¢ �il)1 " rrrriai...rrrr �/1/ �i �iri :.: r.•. ..� Jii �rir Rio 0 GO * ,61.0 2 'n 1 sesIdat es p its; 0 . 11 0 'e 1IN t i 7111 _: .,. Y� Q& itiiii NI. v4 041,, 84, iii 19,0000 of • LEGIBILITY STRIP WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON tA :77; GIs 'f/If /ff /f!!!f,/fi/f/Ifl.'/,97. l /f//% ,-...�ffJfl/�h.• hoz// %<f � 104.4. iii 4t�5 -26O 26O 83:23, ST#2EE 889434'W - -: ,200. 175 =' 1800 N884W x'3:69` Q24:tr: tl!' 66,3 280430'30"E 162.7 .65A 2 f 3500 . 5G A NS1 . opQ o .31A& N C,S,.461i. °' i ?5 3300= 4 o •7 a C.S. • 113 `SEE LEGIBILITY STRIP Nara= a s is ar► %e s a ,.../%0 WASHINGTON- COUNTY OREGON VT t ?ut4b® POINT t 39 ©eE ISO to.el 737 Etsmatoc 7231% t: tair' Af t723 3243 e 3517 117 .30 FOR ASSESS PA EN_ DO NOT RELY 0 20 E4PEMEN'f :1fL. • :�w 425.$ 23 6.Et" 8899VW.: 5327 4300 , 4401. 23,4e tt..S Nail Pni1 `"I f8p °o3' i � .• fig_ m.7 - , 4403 sc w. s tv- ( i j. z �t��:Nt1 X34) \ t = = cm. t2 4404 «� 4700 ,4 2`66 o: , ix X5®0! %kE2 °%6(C.S4900 .NO.i22Q77) a.Ip Ti .27Ac. \`1 to- 5102 .47A ��1 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Tog DATE: Rece►ber _ 30 1991 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: UBDIVISION SUE 9� � DAR .,M.. M�1 SILER (NPO #2) A request for Subdivision approval to divide a parcel of approximately 48,943 square feet into four lots between 8500 and 18,057 square feat eap.ch. Also requested iS Variance approval, to allow a modified cul -de- C. ZPNEs R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units /acre) The R-4,5 zoning allows sing1.e fami'1y detached residential units, public support facilities, renidential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, fam ay day cart, . how 11375 SW 90th Avenue NCTN 1E1 35D(l, tax lot '26 1 APPLICABLE ` occcuiatt ne, temporary use, and residential fuel tanks among other uses. REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code SO'ctione 18.50, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8,1.3 � by various departments and ager�a your s�eviet�a From infoation supplied b vario�, iea and from Other information a�,ohed is the Site Plan and applicant's; statement for available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you Wirth to comment on this application, we need your comments by .7an n.. 9, 1992. You may usie the Space provided below or attach a separate letter to *.storm your canmerith, are unable to re ®goad br. than above date.., plead phone the staff contact noted below with your corn nentee and confirm your commente in writing as Soon as possible. If •fou have any questions; regarding this matter, coi*aet the Tigard g p 97, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OP. 97223. PHONE,: 639 - 4171. Planning n,- D� �ttan ®n�, PO lox 233 8TA11 CONTACT x ®rry PLEASE CRECK THE FOLLOWI lorsiommosiew lossmormeso , ► TEAT APPLY': We have r acre no t�bjeotioran to it. e °��i�erveri the propcea�al and h 'ease contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed a etter. Written Ct m e s Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: ..w bkm /SD:891 -196 BKm • • r' rep W NOTIFICATION LIST FOR,, ALL APPLICATIONS NP® NO 2 (2) copies 2. CITY DEPART 'NTS Building Official /Brad R. ity Recorder Engineering /Chris D. Permits Coordinator /viola C. SPECIAL DI'RICTS V Fire District (Pickup box) Tigard Water District 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 MM Tualatin Va'l'ley Water DLst, Lct 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 • AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use '& Trarnap. 150 N First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 �... _.�, Brent Curt to IIevin martini Joann Rice _....�.. Scctt Ring Fred Eberle Mike Borxeaon IMSVINMEMO City ' of Beaverton Jim Hendry, PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 State Highway Divinion Bob Dora'in PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225 -0412 5. SPECIAL, GENCIES i<''°Oeneral Telephone Ruse Went; 4 ?�2 60 SW Min St. Tigard, OA 97223 NW Natdral Data Stott Palmer 220 NW SeCond Ave. Portland, OR 97209 Cab1eviuton of Oregon Nike Halleck 3500 SW Bond St. Portland, OR 97201 CoiumbLa ale (Frank StOn,t 14200 SW Brigadoon ct. Beavorton, OR 97005 r• CPO NO. Parks St Recreation Board ..r�liae 0Perationo School Diet No. 48 (Beaverton) Joy Pahl. PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 School Diet. 23J (Tigard) 13137 SW Pacific Hwy.. Tigard, OR, 9722) I3oundar'y `'k inz iSSion 320 SW Stark Room 530 Portland, OR 97204, METRO 2000 SW let ave Portland, OR 97201- 5398 DLCA (CPA'i only) 1175 Coup St. NB Salmi, OR 97310 «•0590 Other..._ Portland General Elec. I3rtan Moore 14655 SW Old Saholle Fry. Beaverton, nit 97007 1 Metro Area Communications Jason Hewitt Twin Oaks Technology center 1815 NW 169th Placa /3-0602o Baaverto,'!:,, OR 97006 -4886 17S West Pete Nelson 421 SW Oak St. Poland, OR 97204 . STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics ,Diy`r (bDOT) Engineer Board of Health ,� .. Fish a Wildlife Parke & Recreation Div. Subdivision Supervisor Dept of Energy Dept. of Environ. Quality ioGiAmx Division og St4te Lando ado' ozItu erce DePt. 24.11., Park LCDC PUC Fire Mar3hail �_,.. Other . FEDERAL AGENCIES Corps. of Engineers Poet Office Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M. Forney, PLS - Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, R. ::,24, Union Station Portland, CR 97209 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]