The URL can be used to link to this page

SUB1991-00017POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. rJ;w 8 of Vjola ► t • ? 14885• o 12BC, 801 .' �aaF, rwuaaV +x'.wxs:.;.^�u.:71N`.8L`fi� STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard ® �0 a Int&I ._. _...�.._.... e being firtit duly. sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: 4 Please print) That I am a : M 1 ,....I for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I sewed NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR Tb,at I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of V igard Planning Direetor Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearing., On:ficer Tigard City Council A copy ( g ) of which is attached ItNarked Exh Lsjit �"� ) Baas email Notice/Notice eeaoni named pers oas at th address shown o the attached lit me ked exhibit "d" on the day of 4. ,,,_.„ 19p ' • said notice y DECISION attached, wa,n posted on appropriate bulletin board onthe 1'^ day of 19....f.72,1 and dea, tea in the United States Magi on the day 19 L postage prepaid° OPIP re ratre i,. OtiCe Posted For Dec .sion ®sl" k;� r Person a :iva red to POST OFFICE Sub ibed and sworn/affirm to me on the CITY OF TIGARID Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY HEARINGS OFFICER • Concerning Case Number (e) SUB 91 -0017 • Name of Owner: John Nelms :' er Name of Applicant: Ro ea. Edwards Address 4500 SW glauglAgyLOne tin City Lake Oswego State OR Zip 97 Address of Property: West of SW Slat Avenue south of SW Viola Streets,. and 14885 SW 81st Avenue Tax Map and Lot No(s) . » 281 12EC tax lots 800 Ss 601 Request: A re est for Subdivision a. rovv .l to divLtde an a1 mga i.mately 3 00 acre site into 14 dote ranclir bet�reen apmroximately _7.500 and 6 500 seaur® feet Ache Zone: R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre). 5 zoning allows single- family detached residential units, public c support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day care, home occupations, temporary use, residential fuel tanks, and accessory structures among other uses. Approval as requested Approval with conditions Denial r r 6. Ate' ,• 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall, and mailed to: The applicant and owner(s) X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected Governmental agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON FebruarEAn ,19 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hallo P.O. Box 2391, Tigard, Oregon 91223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(B) and provides y Secti�an 6.32 r 374 which that • pp be ilediwithinn10a.d forms notice is given and a written appeal may be mss and must be sent. The appeal may City accompanied by the appeal fee ($315.00) and transcript co to (varies up to a maximum of $500.00). The deadline for filing of ein appeal is 3 ° 30 p.m. Februarg ,„ 0k_ i99 Qu stion l if yoU have any questions, plea Planning Department, 639.4171. b }sin /SUH91 -11. BKH yi�� 1%1.1,1'14 ty • •. �. t � _ 5 st ;' f!' t �':: t � t L , �� . . • ". W+ uJ�:�_i � ' � !¢ BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR laffi MY OF TIGARD, ORA3ON apps y p Engineering n.or) FINAL ORDER. In matter of a� � application for h 14-lot subdivision ) approval of a pit p for and adjoining SW 81 Avenue worth of Ross St. ) SUB 91 -0017 in the R-4.5 zone in the City of Tigard, egon ) (Matthew Park) I. SUMMARY OF TfriE REQUEST The applicant r � uess ap proval oi a preliminary ' Plat to subdivide about pnt 3 acres into 14 lot s for single family detached dwellings, Proposed lots � ant 500 to square feet and comply ith the lira nsionai r uire is of the R-4,5 esidential) zone. The applicant will improve SW 81st Aventra adjoining the site, mid create portions SW Matthew P Street and a private street on the site. Staff recommended conditional approval. The applicant accep#ecl the conditions of approval. The developer of a nearby subdivis'on sand four area residents testified with objections and concerns about impacts of the subd vision on visual character, trees and habitat, and traffic on SW 81st Avenue and SW Ross Street. LOCATION: West of SW 81st Avenue about 800 feet south of Bonita Road; wC■,I 12EG Tax 'dots 800 and 801 APPLICANT: Alpha Engineeiing for John Ncimeyert and Roger Edwards SITE AREA: About 2.94 acres APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code, Ch. . , 18.88, 18. 92, . � 50 18 S8 A$ 9 1� x.08 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164. and Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 4.3.1, 7,1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditionally approve EXAMINER'S DIuSION: Conditionally approved IL FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDDIGS A. Site size and shape The site consists of two tax lots. Tax lot &)0 contains about 1,86 acres. Tax let 801 /• . .. A r . . p wide w Mantains about 1.08 acre. The site is rectangular in shape. It is 396 feet �vid�, (north - south) and 325 to 331 feet deep (east - west). B. Site location south Bonita Road Y . , ad ort the west side of SW The site is situated about 800 feet youth �o�f SW 81st Avenue There xs a dwelvng arid associated outbuildi.n, s on the north portion of the site. The applic t plans tt remove thee stn ctures . Page 1 Hearings Off it ei deetsion SUB 91-0017 (Matthew ry r* ti n r a e w /A �'I rl M•,w� S D. Proposed uses and structures The applicant pcmpo' s to divide the site into 14 lots for single family dwellings. Proposed lots range ' ' square feet 8650 square feet. All lots hove an in size � average depth of at least 90 feet. -Twelve lots average width ol, at least 55 feet g p have front lot lines oriented within 30 degreert of a true line east -west ne and a north- south dimension of 90 feet. E. Existing and proposed vegetation The site c: mains about 22 nut trees, some of which will be situated in proposed rights of way and developable a eas of the proposed lots. There also is a row of closely- spaced cedar trees along the street frontage. The applicant suggested saving those trees t �� ► � �� re: on the site, but and building a sidewalk behind nature of the may ire preclude either option. More the location and closely-spaced pry 9 also is a variety of vegetation around the existing single family home and outbuildings and around a depression at to southwest corner of the sites F. Topography and drainage 1. The site slopes generally from a high of about 204 feet above mean sea level (insl) at the southeast coma er of the site and 202 feet at the northwest corner to a low point of about 190 feet nisi at the northeast corner. 'There is a vertical curve along 81st Avenue that impedes sight distance somewhat south of the site 2: into manmade Storm water generally northeast across the site There is a� p t _ , �^ �� site into wch storm does from land to the depression at the southwe ► corner of the site south and west may have drained in he Past, but the depression not contain water now, based on a site inspection by the Hearings Officer preliminary v , ' ity plan, the applicant proposes to direct storm water 3. Based on she aitih �,: from streets on the site to catch basins at 81st Avenue, from which point the water would flow norlh`toward the storm system designed for the Raze meadows I subdivision. A catch basin also would be provided at the north end of the proposed P would 81st 15-foot public storm private street, from which a storm line �extend east via a 15 -f drainage easement across the rear of lots ..: 81: ,serve storm sewer, . Officer assuits'the applicant _.., 1l fill th d. tress on at the southwest The Hearings � corner of the site rather than use it as a storm water retention feature: Therefore the preliminary plan does not provide for collection of storm water that used to flow into little water topographic basin limit is within 200 feet of the south edge of the that depression. The site, so little storm water would be expected to flow onto the site from the so G. Plan designart irt and zoning That and vicinity are designated Low Density Residential on the Plan Map and are zoned R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per are): H. Public, services and utilities The site by p 4 ► y s. Sewer service is available from a to is served b public sewer and water s stein a manhole at the east edge of the site. Page 2 Hearings [)der decision SUB 91 -0012 (Matthew Park) a1, •Y,i'tY , i� '; 1. Streets and access 1. The site has a bout 396 feet of frontage on SW 81st Avenue, a local street with a roughly 15 -foot half -width pavci section in a 20 -foot half width right of way. Further north and south, adjoining ' 81st Aven p vest to full width standards between curbs, with sidewalks along 4,onie sections. The condition recent subdivisions, Avenue is ,� g o + grad returns to a roughly 20 -foot paved section near its intersection with Bonita Road. There is a slight vertical curve in the road at the south edge of the site. 2. The applicant proposes to widen the right of way for 81st Avenue and to improve j . i proposed have direct access to 81st 81st Avenue adjoining the site. Two of the mo sed lots will Avenue at the north end of the site 3. The applicant proposes to dedicate a 50 -foot right of way for and to improve SW Matthew Street as a public local street from 81st Avenue to the west edge of the site, from which point it could be extended in, the future when adjoining land develops. The right of way is situated so that. ax adjoining lot to the west (lot 5 in La Mancha Estates) can be enlarged when the street is extended in that direction, so that that lot complies with corner yaid setback requirements. Ten of the proposed lots will have direct access to this street. 4. The applicant proposes to establish a 25 -foot wide private tract and to build a private street in that tract to serve two of the proposed lots that do not have frontage on Matthew Street or 81st Avenue. 5, There is access from 81st Avenue north to Bonita Road, an east -west arterial street. There is access from 81st Avenue west to Hall Boulevard via Ross Street to the south or east to 79th Avenue via streets in the AshfoMdi Oaks subdivision to the south. Ross but improved standard. It has a .,roughly 18 -foot paved surface without curbs or sidewalks. A 90 elan Street is a minor collector, ut >l� not � �v p portion of Ross Street is expected to be improved as 'a condition of approval of another subdivision, but the improvement of the rest of the street to collector standards has not been funded. J. Surrounding land uses Surrounding land generally consists of oversized parcels dev d west and single family detached dwellings and associated accessory outbuildings. . feet south of the site (Ashford Oaks) of the site (La Mancha land te Estates and hundred Park), north and northeast of the site have �� Meadows) and ( � been developed for urban subdivisions. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Community ty Development Code. 1. Chapter 1, 8:SO contai>r►tted u the zone. �t � the zone must . detached � the faultily . residential wit is a permitted y ...: following dimensional requirements: Minimum lot size 7500 sq ft Ave. t. ;dot width.. 50 feet Front setback ......... 20 feet Max. building height . 30 feet Page 3 Hearings Officer decision SUB 91 -0017 Wail/Imo Park) Street side setback....15 feet/20 feet for garage Rear setback ... i5 feet Interior side setback..5 feet Iyi� ":A Yi 1� • 2. Chapter 18.88 contains st 'ards for solar access for new development. A lot complies with the basic solar ae Bess standard if it has a north- south dimension of 90 feet or more and has a front lei lime enented with 30 degrees of a true east -west line. A subdivision complies with these. standards if at least 80 percent of the lots in the h subdivision comply with the basic standard or use protected solar building lines or performance mane requirements to achieve the same goal. 3. Chapter r 18.92 contains sta nards for density. The number of dwelling units permitted is based on the net development area, a mlutbng sensitive land areas and land dedicated for public roads or parrs. To determine the number of lots, multiply the net development area by the number of units allowed per acre in t he zone. 4. pterr 18.108 contains access standards. Private streets car driveways are permitted to serve up to six dwelling units subject pavement width and improvement standards that vary f ' g5 co be served. `� with the number of dwellings r ed. A, common driveway serving two dwellings must have a 'minimum pavement width of 20 feet in minimum 25 -foot access tract. A turn around is required if the private stet is more than 150 feet Ion ,. 5. Chapter 18.150 requires a "permit and contains standards for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter four feet above the ground on undeveloped land. A. permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria: a. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; b. The trs;es have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to othery if,;e utilize the applicant's ma P ' roperty in a reasonable manner, c The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability. or drainage pr rslems d. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balrinae between shade and open space; e. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely afiecte d by the tree removal; and f. New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. 6e Chapter 18,160 at must e;o�nd standards with following divisions. To apps, preliminary P comply a, It cat and other with City's comprehensive plan and the applicable zoning comply thus applicable ordinances tee! regulations; b. The proposed plat name is not duplicative or otherwise satisfies the provisions' of ORS Chapter 92; c. The streets and reeds are laid out so as to conform to the plats of subdivisions and maps of major partitions already approved for adjoining property as to width, general daehdon and in all other respects Hearings Ofj cme decision WB 91 -0017 (Maithe Pork) 7. Chapter 18.164 contains standar& for streets and utilities. a. se .bion 18.164.030(A) requires streets within and adjoinhig a development to be dedicated and improved based on the elassification of the street A future °pro guarantee may p lieu of improvement, among other vent ara�atee ma be accepted in ben reasons, if: (1) A partial improvement is hot feasible due to the inability to achieve property (sic) design standards, or (2) A partial improv =eat may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians.... b. Section 18.164.030(E) provides a local street is to have a minim" 50-foot right of way and 34 -foot paved section between curbs and sidewalks. dedicated street that 418.164.030(F) � uires for a reserve strip and barricade be extended off-site, d. Section 18.164.030(M) requires grades of 12% or less. e. Section 18.164.060 prohibits lot depth from being more than 2 -1 /z time .z he lot width and requires at least 25 feet of frontage on a suet, L Section 18.164M0 requires sidewalks adjoining all local residential streets. g. Section, 18.164.090 requires sanitary sewer service. h. Section 18164 100 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements for storm drainage facilities. B. Applicable Comprehen.sive Plan Policies. t the end of a 1. Willey 2.1.1 provides the City will a su ze citivetas will be provided an opportunity for be involved in all phases of the planning process. 2. Y 4.2.1 Pn� a�op � • • hard urban lannin g area sh all comply with applicable federal, state and regional vata uaht ydtat The o n Environmental Quali Quality nmi on reoently adopted a rule , gthat all new development that adds impervious surface within the boundaries of the Unified Sewerage Authority must construct a water quality treatment facility. See USA Resolution and Order 91 -47. 3, Policy 7.1.2 provides the City willregtnre as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and utilities placed underground. 3. Policy 73.1 pmvides the City will coordinate water services with water districts. 7.4A hires all new development to be connected to an approved roved s 4 P°�,1icy r p pp sanitary sewer system: Page S Hearings Officer deeisson SUB 91 =0011 (Matthew Fork) 5. Policy 8.1.1 provides the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated d a��t� growth � amd development. 6. Policy 8.1.3 provides the City will require as a precondition of approval that a. Development abuts a dedicated street or has other adequate access; b. Street right of way shall be dedicated ` y 'rated. where the sweet ia substandard in width; c. The develo pe r shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs and sidewalks to City standards within the development; d. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; e. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. W. HEARING, TESTIMONY, AND NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS A. Hearing. The Hearings Officer received testimony at the public hearing about this application on January 13, 1992. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C. (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. B. Summary of testimony. 1. Jerry Offer testified f or the City and summarized the staff report and recommendation. He also reviewed the recent history of subdivisions that have tee approved in the vicinity, and introduced a letter from Steve and Debbie Mangold. He also responded at length to much of the public testimony. 2 y accepted the staff report and �, Randy Clarno testified for the applicant and • summarized the preliminary g p response to need P drainage plan t� re recommendation. He s 8 ' concerns about tyre need to accommodate storm water drainage from the south. He also responded to public testimony. 3. Dan MacKinnon, who is the developed of the nearby Rate Meadows subdivision, °• . on 81st Avenue, testified with concerns about the impact of increasing traffic particularly with vertical sight distance constraints on the street and its substandard 1, vel of irprovernen .s at points. He testified with concern about the impact v additional storm drainage frog. the site on downs properties, rioting that the si.onn drainage set to be tested under peak storm conditions. He systen, for Raze Meadows has yet street for aesthetic reasons. 1-Ie opined that the cedar �; tion objected to the use of a prl��`t successfully replanted due to heir close spacing and trees along 81st Avenue canny be y p. interconnectedness. s. 4. Steve Mangold, Chuck Rabin, George and '.w. Cristnan testified in opposition or with the following concerns. Page 6 Hearings Officer de i. of SUB '91 -1017 Matthew Pc i-k) a. The subdivision would change the character of the neighborhood, from one etF large lots to one of small lots and relatively high density and traffic generation. b. If the area is going to develop, then Ross Street should be kip ved first and SW 81st Avenue should be improved to full width standards, particularly at its intersection with Bonita Road. The vertical curve to the south should be removed sight distance Improvement of the roads should �� remedy the existing ,.� � Instance �constradnt . ,, .. • , by adjoining in ng precede development of the subdivision. SW 81st . t venue was built b addo residents and was to be friaantained by the Count Its lack of maintenance the past contributes to its porn ctirtditton today. c. The construction of the sultesivision will remove matum ures on -sia as and may remove support for trees off-site and will destroy habitat, lowing local wildlife onto adjoining pmperties. d. The site should continue to accommodate storm water drainage as it has in the past. e. Some of the impmvements a'on g 81st, Avenue are unsightly, and behavior of some contractors making those and associated improvements is disruptive to the neighborhood. C. NPO and Agency Cor a ants. The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the NPO and agency comments listed on pages 6 through 9 of the staff Deport dated January 13, 1992. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. Compliance with Community D elopment Code. 1. The proposed lots comply with the use standards of the R -4.5 zone, because they will be usec'i for single family detached dwelling units. The lots comply with the nensional standards of the R-4.5 zone, because they each contain at least 7500 square feet and a Minimum average lot width of 50 feet. At least 80 percent of the proposed comply ,. dared for new development. A ro sed lets com with the ba�s�e solar access standard nditivn is warranted requiring the applicant to ob9taina demolition onn li permit Chapters co structures removed from the site. Therefore the sublivision complies p 18.5'0 and 18.88: 2. The proposed subdivision comp _.. ' . L density .. standards of Chapter 18.92, complies month the densi because the net developable area of the site divided by 4.5 units per acre eqaals 14.5 lots. 3. The proposed private street to serve two lots complies with the standards for such access in Chapter 18.108, because the street will have a 20 -foot paved surface in t i25- foot tract. A turn - around is not required at the end of the street, because the see less than 150 feet long. The City Code does not prohibit or impede use of private streets under cheumstances such as those in this case. li gni number of nature trees to provide feit e a significant nuTxibtr 4. The applicant will remove rights of way, and lo. develo p ment. Because the e f a tresethetic chthare ms s t ' te , d a f t i. d e area will be adversely affected by removal of large matey Page 7 - Hea,aings °flee. dedsi'o SUB 91-0017 (Matthew Park) i ' i4t YI because the applicant has not shown that proposed tree cutting outside of public rights of way complies with Cole Chapter 1 8.150, a condition is warranted prohibiting the applicant from removing trees 6 inches or more in diameter four feet above the ground frown the get: until the applicant applies for and receives a tree cutting permit pursuant to that chapter. 5. The propos d subdivision complies with Chapter 18.160, because: a. It complies 'aii,r the Comprehensive plan map designation of the sire, the applicable pla re policies, the regulations of the R-4.5 zone, and other app cable regulations. bH The proposed name of the subdivision, Matthew Park, is not duplicative. c. The roads in and adjoining the site conform to the road pattern in the area, provide for needed east. -west cross - circulation, and enhance traffic safety in the vicinity as d result of proposed improvements 6. The proposed subdivision complies wit' Chapter 18.164, because. av The applicant will dedicate for and improve roads on and adjoining the site to City standards, including a 50 -foot right of way and 34-foot paved ,section for Matthew Street and a half-width right of way dedication and 'improvement for 81st Avenue. b. A conditions is warranted requiring a reserve strip at the end of Matthew Street. c. Proposed streets will have a grade of 12% or less, based on the topography map. dr Lots are not more than 2 -1h deeper than the lot width and ha` a at kast 25 feet of frontage on a stmt, bared on the preliminary plat. e. All streets on the site will be improved with side ^►elks. f.; All lots will be served by public sanitary sewer and a storm drainage system. ✓d onditic is are warranted uirin granting of easements for the storm rower gam g system and other utilities where they cross private property, and requiring the applicant to submit a plan showing the location of existing utilities that will be retained. B. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies. The subdivision . complies ei k Policy � 11 because notice of the application or r hearing was provided to the neighborhood planning or ganization in the area and to owners of property in the vicinity of the site. Although the development chmges the existing character of the site, it is consistent with the Comprehensive; Plan to develop the site for housing at proposed densities so that expected population growth can be accommodated in the urban area. 2. The subdivision complies with Policy 4,2.1 provided the applicant installs a storm water quality facility or complies with regulations regarding such facilities when the final plat is submitted for approval. Page 8 - Heariigs Officer dec1�.sian SUB 91 -017 (Matthew Park) Wxr3F Y�.'e -. w 3. '1'',$e subdis ision complies 'with Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4, because the app, cant will extend public sewer wd water system to the site, will provide a storm watet sltainate system on the site, and will provide underground utilities. Detailed p xblxc i�� il , improvement plans r.�d b� p p � ' and a pp` 4. The subdivision complies with Policy 8.1.1 and 8.1.3, because the street system on • W will ty, th development facilitates and adjoining sai st wes mss ul on and the 'wp ven. nt of 81st Avenue remedies necessary �.�s existing substandard conditions. VL SITE WSTT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The Hearings Officer visited the site of the proposassi suet ivision. VAL COlgCLUSION AND DECISION The Hearings Officer concludes that the proposed subdivision will promce the general welfare of the City, and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surroundhig land uses, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with � a pp iccbt e local, state, and federal laws recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, �p�pc t n the Staff conclusions 1 � . • i (.W ■d dIYVoA�.�o�Ol�RYl�6'r r Re Repoli, other reports of erected agencies and public testimony and exhibits received in p „ . gs y ply 91-0017 (Matthew Park), subject to this n�ati��, the �e�,� Officer hereby � ties S the following conditions: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL B 5��TIS d AND m PUBLIC VEME°s SHALL BE OOMPLEIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR 10 THE I�S1A� ISSUANCE �� S F� �lR� ON OP SUBDIVISION CRT� RECODING OF THE �y WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. (Staff contact for all conditions. is Chris Davies, anless otherwise noted.) 1. The final plat shall provide for no t more than 14 lots. The fli al plat shall show all proposed comply with the requirements of the R-4.5 zone. The dimensions of the sed lots final plat also shall comply with applicable provisions of ORS 92, City of Tigard Code Chapter 18.160, and applicable Washington County standards. provide for dedak stion of necessary rights of way for public • � . all g �' p �, The final plat shall pro street in and adjoining the subdivision. 3. The applicant shall submit plans, obta a 'City approval, and provide financial g public City ., which shall be assurance � the construction �fthe l'ollo��nn ublac aan roverr�e*�tsr w designed and built consistent with requu nts of the City of Ttg Or accepted by the ty within the time frame specified in the public a►ssur cc contra a. All public streets v h a and adjoining oinirg e ' subdivision as specified herein; and b. A stoma drainage systerri 4. All existing building shall be removed or comply with the building setback removing standards for the R-4.5 tone The applicant ltuon permit scant shill obtaxr►. Fore:. exiting buildings on the site. Contact Brad Roast, Building Division. Page 9 Hearings of er dlecaaion 5(1B 91 -0017 Olathe* * Parkl Zoy I;( • I eM� 5. The final plat shall establish a minimum 25 -foot wide access tract to se` ve lots 7 and 8. Regarding that tract, the applicant shall: a. Build a minimum 20 -foot wide paved common & ae way within that tract to City local strut standards before issuance of a building permit for the lots to be served or provide a satisfactory monetary performance assurance to the City, b. Place signs gong the common driveway prohibiting parking on OM:: side. sign p • • l ^ tb. Street stating C. Place ai•si at the intersection of the private street and �.na�►.��.�► Stree that the driveway is privately owned. and maintain d. Record a joint use and maintenance agreement for each lot sharing the common driveway. tixe public storm water drainage ,,. The applicant shall. provide adequate site drainage to �'' � p provide private :�coim dw3 . and a drainage system for all lots. The applicant shall rovid� a ��iv� r sed lot 8 unless the applicant shows that stoma water from this lot can • • Y easement to the proposed storm drain systempwiteout crossing other private property. The pp grant easement where: a private storm drain line mosses other lots. applicant shall ant an ease lots The applicant shall record a joint maintenance ageement for each lot with access to a common private storm drain line. Contact Brad Roast, Building Division. pp • public improvement plans and 7. The a lip It shall submit two (2) sets of for preliminary review and profile construction drawings to the Engineering Department approval. The public improvements shall comply with Code Chapter 1 8.164. The applicant shall submit seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate. The plans and estimate shall be p ;repared by a professional er ,weer licensed in Oregon. These plans are in addition to plans requite by the Bi 'ding Division and should include only those sheets relating to public improvements. 8. The applicant shall make standard half -width 'improvements to 81st Avenue g . , • . n, and concrete adjoining the site, including sidewalk driveway apron, curb, �h�uund utilities; or, a pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, strut lights, local improvement district that includes the subdivision shall be fa- �d and approved d�stri by the City Council. 9. The applicant shall dedicate a 50 -foot right of way for and shall devices, improve Ma ew ~l g ccontrol devices, box Street to local street standards on the site, including n traffic. concrete pavement, clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway apron, club, asphaltic p sewer, storm drainage, lights, and underground utilities: The applicant, shall deed a one -foot reserve strip to the City at the west end of Matthew Street.. 10. The applicant shall execute • y xc„�u� and record a maintenance and access e�ert�eng for all storm drain ontfa�il ° i provided by the City. The agreement shall be drain ^ �, using forms prove • p applicable parcel duds. The agreement shall be referenced on and become of all app • p approved by the Engineering Department before it is recorded. 11 The applicant shall submit a grading plan showing sting and proposed conto►rs e and typical finish floor elevations on each ot, including elevations at different corners 4 of the floor plan tied to the top of curb elevations on the public improvement plans. Page 10 Hearings Officer decision SUB 91 -00,17 (Matshew' Park) 12. The applF "`,03t shall sr`ihx it and receive appgoval of an msiort contra) plan as Part The plan *�1B ,Coi fo n to Erosion of oI ®f the public improvement drawings. ..A� Plans - Technical Gupta. ee Handbook," November, 1 ' &7.' 13. Trees with a tram daa`rneter larger* than 6 inches measured d 4 feet above grade shall be removed only to provide for streets; utilities. and teaidence , and to mow for g'itading as appmed. The applicant shd .1 of tain a 'at :utt g pe, nit before removing any trees from the property. The Qty inay =quirt the applicant to mvide a arborist to review the l for i .g 2 tree Protection. The `,' lacaat sell p r test thane trees e retained which are sere �. �s k�ra and fencing p ; of � � Tat. . • + �� ,� the r�ie� �� a� des The e e c'r t, '. • !' ret ined _ ii ,y `flit and �� ari.��ast or 1''la�f�in Division a�a i the eve measures of .� on the site. A copy of the �. , . , �)p�6i�vd g plan s1�.�1 be available on -site during all tree call and gr g activities. Contact Jerry Oi er, Planning irisaon, 14. The applicant sh0. instill a water quality facility th at complies with Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order 91.47; pnyvideal the City Engineer may waive this requirement: to the extent allowed by regu ions of the 'Envinc ntal Commission and Unified Sewerage Agency when public improvement plan are approved or installed: 15. The applimnt shalt make an appointaient fnrr a lire-construction �ar .,erring with the City of `Tigard &iigiincoring Departrfrent after approval of the public improvement t plans The applicant, the a applicant's engineer, and thee, but before �g work ®n the .:sate. . o . p contractor shall be regulated t attend this meeting prior to ling the approval plans and permits. 16 The applicant shy su htit r ;c o a City Ti and l a gin o� n g Department gent a nnylat copy of the subdivision plan alter recordna . SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHALL OF � S RD 18 MONTh OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS tIECISY.ON, s 24th c y ana ary,199 J 11 w'ingp 0 er ddectmon 3tlt 91-OO/7 (Matthew Park) • HO �r � �' c) The City o f ; ii 1 -� a a =N -- -- . BoNZTA T I G A R D ,� , SUB 91 1 1 - Eill CT . lei , b kvare jig c , . , . S to Area „„,,,..,„,,,..,,,,,, , I l 00 1 !I mod. =cK 0 > . Li n m � \ N:C -00801 Q `t j I I I • ME CT . C plasi WI --�: R OSS i 1 •111111 Illr z 111.411r i 1 O. 1111111. cl, r- � Digital iota t map represee- lallon tonpl led ly the Clly f l9 FON Dp , a 1141 el 0111: leg Ceogra- I. „� � slit Infer /101o' Sretem i. CI$) software. lalor- J y. r �,1'1■ '� 11111 �. . . Mill p ti , N O R T H tetal od /r -” �) �,. at determined by mil mu 1111 I ri riammleluaimg t he City e( flgard. via 0 a wd hipl A I6 1 ILIW liNif JOHN NEIMEYER C /') ROGER EDWARDS 450C) SW KRUSE WAY ONE #180 LAKE OSFHGC OR 97035 CRAIG HOPKINS 7430 SW VARNS ST TIGARD OR 97223 RANDY CLARNO ALPHA ENGINEERING, INC. C)6G ;,a SW OAK SUITE 230 TIGARD OR 97223. CHUCK BABXN 14825 SW 81ST ,AVE T/GARD OR 97224 J & GEORGE C RIS$AI 14940 SW 81ST AVE TIGARD OR 97224 STSi E NIANdOLI) 8275 SW ROSS ST TIGARD OR 97224 (1050trig/7,3 09,10 r/ d/ /7 z /"j/4 :7(y/' --*/45,a4 0/4/ 57i/a o 47,-.11/ 'I/7g -4,?"242.39-7 (/.. ' e�'��° t�� .. , 2/,�i' �= 7 4//f. , 0'7b/ ot( /40' ?,-9/e/07 9 2fiQ' ,. y r 1 ` ,/, 9 7t w. ( (7011/ a?e,c& 72/ ,vez 0/4, (--zityteiriv,(47 .72r// . 10 (7 %574// / ---%/7 f °® "S, /4:41441,1' *VA, :I71 4Y- M!ar°tdrrnd Iw -et -u. . atr /NAaH14tAMtwaw#?MYSrI: ��IWiW ,#M= Y+4*.v#?'M.9:A:iAy�gCxsth1. ANYgb, vt.#�NU.hprroJM- Plq;,: up. wxs+• Y :WFnpI.u11M.aIJr«,W1sJYanµY4W4.1 ktY �witi*=: tiVitiYl'+= k+ ?rYY4: i4iMH6�H*. S' N::, HnYpi.+ aaY _YYYtJA�.Wkaa'kl %yIYA:RsraS:: 3h' ICY:AV'L {�W W iM'kh1: Awy'ho fn'tl.'f1'+h'uY : gq#W VIIAIFAIWhYrk::9 Nr Wir. ..y{il._w7n +JM'xlv.�LJ�nYrn"Y"t l'Wr:'��(p{'p n ti.� r�aYikMMY��n�7'MY:V�IIgFP' 1':i'MrF1YYKhLL#W#:PNY w:.14VSJUIMn4Wr+F1 '6. ta* ovrleal4F:. «piutr.VYI+wWr'aMR1ItM!N+h#4�ri ei. .xMYt6/i1N,uW><S?vI1r�W'+.YbMI. k#Yk'.Cw,+t'WeAM# Y4Y ,P3WN#xs:YwG :41 41 no 1•, 4 +u.l«Hr, WIN .;:wN.A -W 1J 'wti "INR� FwYSlul�saN«kNRaR:KP� f1MV 1'a1.4MrWY.'« 41 1 R4HiNW,WaY;lyHiW.+N.1:Wr.Wpp': ^IM'?Vi /J rY vw,sklu..tWY.a r:e: Ir ✓a.w.+:. - �r #Ya1F. it-,1e. Un a.pay..r111.r,w , ayla:Cfe,srk # saxa:« - tuN.auw.#.:nV'4F'4h''. tl4Y'pF«k �sFk4ik1nVNaga1+1",IY'ktwM'iM MNygtlM1pu+ wMaNNN: WNale +rlti.bY4iiH!/NnxM`:Vawa%(Y. WSW W:YwY1�% iWNM+CW"Inp as:.fu>rmra n.t .•wn #aYr.1 f. .Y HMI: iw attplwYnrs. niamwpwnnwwe ;,rwael +asxuax :anw,u+tb:a«IF;: .uP.F F P r;R.'nIMW#va/Pk«q.wYR Wr coriLerfrtkA. ftw=v?Ia�+.Nin,r+•Ii�va.Y,:Ni� (i,Mwi 1�9sbiJ1Mie ✓Ji11KW/4 <tFNf4'lIP/On. nl.l:glxwr11+W±'M i11 alNpndl ltpdMMHY .+iants:341 PC olk:At x.a�l:;nrt:twq w.l:ux:lr,iu: • AA a..: Mu IIOe..a# MM A .IgFirp.r.+pavKl..i j4sRY,+ i1,1, k` f<.A1:MIk5A4H:+1111MN+'Hk1, aq"P#tl W1Y- 4,!` 1+ 1 +5,�?t!4"IWP.IMik4.WMn'+YMk7tlFP 114 rY,,.tr:�f;Ya10u.:;ls . « N��• w+.ntvwM+�rW +Mww�++H4i1vVM+Wke1 • M., a+«, rr �+�n.a�,Yi, temNwM.cwNrnua4frr,1: :la:rarr,tw'nn. f4 Ffrir'iYl *uN4r rl AAA UUYUYr1a.aY:+ww4riwlYSM1w +Y- •..urxi/.rtin+y;ppr+Mwgh@ i!hr YuvVMW +�aN61'Y +Y4i9L':WF4:!I«{I101 YSWi']NSpW+'WU;µBSr`Awn:;< prdv ..<eifk:N:Y14+!- c'uw"w.:r rnn+4!1'N.rvtnik Me�+wfY+J,I':�+MYI. r. aerninne 'r41rycYN.YY W,WIY.,k'+NixNNNY ;fNk'P.`WwWnIFY- 'L�INVY. ker+Wnu +faveui�x+!Yr.. " dU' JA'. WtiFYk! 4YaY, k '+%W,Y1sw,'.rM "MfAAF'JM ^a.fRptn 44 ..wwNwl a,9xw+l�s au h`F•'�A' �a I i '.;'nlrr,nYaWnY4M+lpr«W{ wnl+irMf.nW w Wa: xtxNN^ dtlwb4lWpFfrNa 'M +r�+Ntln'.»'w,p»M+efaNV�n4 W NV+dN +M'f+Nzn. A I:..n1Ya.M1u :WNY =r»nre«r» wt.., M1.+ 4''•; w %.r.:4W+.NM'rwWr.Y= .FKa..,�.r,. r - 7a.:iq lry: 1.4F:.� ., ... ..tFS.J•• ^14.:surMZnll,� +'l. ahx Mn4'.':J. -mnYM W ror Ht.I W tAR;41b1aNe YIrIMNNfnI Nlfi YA49e:igmarswrW%:i =Yw d:Y.Y:t✓,IYYwllirM + nY>k ✓rNt+NA + r4,F.WIY nttWk ai114 {il /YH „Y1dH.aL.�ly4 aNrewWI }n✓1NlYW∎ -∎• '%hrf5.M,Jblp4'iA'.H4 AM'l.!MM:Y:.Y.KY4: ',;tW14W�`kl',VtN�.Mlf*V'k'ttt t Al CaaA WN:wYMnt- t'.Y.rCUt:IbRR iaJ H- urWIHNWw.;:vo-.anweyr -r.um vAf-r: :smutMnx4a4H+W Y- Y.y „4a= t? f.nyY4n'AY.1= !' /tF.V,14 Aar:MY, Ildkt ugf614wA+' YrirW'YdW}4MWM'1VIy+?WLitl�Mlrr fl4kn11F:fiM'ei+k- WVl{?F'M4 F' rw. L. aauw4vl :wrun.N1'#+`- ii:�M#f,:MaNhY 4M4/FMpHVdwF+ePlhMaf / sV+i.1' lunyvr«NM�F++ WwnwwnYlNe ''P�'�W>- nw.alWerK.MY+�Y : Jke- a<vttM:9v. /wfYMwYFr14,” w.+ w, r. An- r. Im: x+ w.« �wtaYUxrVU.> w, aYY. md. rwhkxY' 4xnk�V' Y. rMK4uV- u+. r"+ �mHM« tv+ lrp> rMa✓. 4V: ru�Y: M++ K:. a. jr, YUe1a.. A» N•++ 1�MMy"'” M^ WMnYwritWl? «W'fWN+MFrM�Y++g14b�/. w• Aw{ P' kl lruwC. aiWM1Cwlr+gW?"4Yr�Ylw$M11gi! -Y!'? +v,4�YUWaaa.: r.4 a.Hrar.. m° ur;. iawdr- xw• V! �! rw++: nYb` MtNwwau. Fr+ l' �a'+ rk•+ A .;%.4WNnMHrwdilr'+''aN,inw++klt cAnt It 11A npnnt tik M': YNrwM„ r�rk+ arr�.+ ar+«' d•,+ mN. al. ws.« wFYr. rw4+ wa, MW,». aa.+ wWY« Knr+ a++ c.+ rarY +",w...:�..�..�.- N.. «:.wF -�•. tin STAFF REPORT TO THIS BEARINGS, OFFICER MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1992 7 :00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST CASE: Subdivision SUB 91 -0017 -- Matthew park S • The applicant requests subdivision preliminar• plat approval to SUMMARY: divide an approximately 2.94 acre, ,h and 8 ce $ ,i square feet. o fourteen lots ranging in size batween 7,500 John Neimeyet c/o Roger Edwards The Eq ity Group 4500 SW Kruse Way 0180 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: Same AGENT: Alpha Engineering Clatney plaza wept �® 9600 SW Oak Tigard OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION R-4.5 `Residential, 4.5 unita /acrs m y LOCATION: SW 81st Avenue (WCTM 2S1 12BC, Tape Lots ,800 and 801j • Community Developi ent Code Chapter 18.50, ..- 4 3 p 1 8. .8 APPLICABLE LA►Y�. C® ,. s 1.8 - 50; 18 � 8►8, 18 .92, 18.108, 18.150, 18.100, 18.164, and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2..4.1, , 1 , 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ON Approval sob�ect to conditions. II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS Site size and shame Tax lot 800 contains 1.86 acres. Tax lot 001 contains 14 08 acres o The rectangular in shape with 396 feet of fronts St Avenue ands is en 325 and 331 feet in de th. and between p ac a On . 8 Site _1ocation The site is located on the wed,(1 side of SW Slat Avenues X her 800 feet eolith o4,� spa Bonita Road, The site d �ciut#�� O f t recen • •� e • • ,s • developed but vacant Raze Meadows subdivision and east of the fully developed La Mancha Estates subdivision. Existtn cc u ses and, structures: Tags lot 801 present y *tingle family residence, and nut ever�al, presently contains a outbuildings. Tax lot 800 is vacant and contains a number of n trees. A g of rya of cedar trees are located along the SW 81st Avenue frontage tax lot 800 Ig ra by an snag e The site slopes gently to the north and east. E. Plan deal net at a nd; zoningz The site and adjoining properties in all directions are designated Low Density Raesidential on the Comprehensive Plan Map and are zoned R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre). P. Sulrzoundingw and pe immediately north contain single Properties to the south, east, and immed�.a y... a lots. Parcels to the north and family residences on relatively large n •y developed Raze Meadows northeast are vacant lots within the recentl de subdivision. Parcels to the northwest are developed with single family residences n this subdivision within the La .Mancha 1 Estates. feet SW �►3rea► Avenue within 800. Parcels to the is stubbed to elle south, 106 feet west of tax lot 8 west and southwest of the subject ate are large open fields. These parcels therefore have substantial potential for redevelopment. G. Pro fds�e_ use: The PP site into • fourteen lots ranging in size from 7,500 5 0 t proposes 8, 65 square feet as illustrated on the preliminary plat. The lots are intended for single family residential use. H. Public sservices and utilities: The preliminary utility plan proposes that the .. deserved by ne subdivision be served extensions of a sanitary sewer from SW 81st Avenue. storm drat elewis g existing proposed to be provided through extension of an southward fr storm SW Matthew Street to catch basin o n that line in SW 81st; drainage and a : �.r a drain line from a catch basin in the proposed common driveway to the new line in 81st. water service would be ox 'r;tided, through a new water line in SW Matthew Street from an existing line in Stiff 81st. Streets and access: . Y . enue SW S .� The site . ' .. outage along SW 61st Avenue. 81st i8 had ��3� feet of frontage • eu • :. , � :. . . functionally classified as a `local street. SW 81st Avenue along the subject rop right -of --way ° width fromm centerline and P 1 Y .art'... has 20 feet of HEARINGS OFFICER - SUB 91- -0017 MATTHEW PARX PAGE P" deWalk, approximately ,'�� feet of �venter�t from centerlines but no s�f curbs, or storm draLnq. The Preliminary 'subdivision plat notee a 5 foot right-of-way dedication is intended along the site's SW Slat frontage. Half-street improvements are. proposed. The subdivision would involve the creation of a local street extending westward 330 feet from SW 81st Avenue. This street is tentatively named. SW Matthew Street. The typical street section on the preliminary plat indicates that this street is itended to be constructed to full local street standards. s- SW Matthew Street w <.,iuld be stubbed at the western edge of the site so that it May be extended in the future to connect with SW 83rd ' Avenue as Tax Lot 900 of map 281 12C8 develops. The northwestern corner of the SW Matthew Street right-of -way is proposed to be 5 feet south of the lot 5 in La Mancha Estates so that when this street is extended lot 5 can be expandd to meet coner yard setback requirements. A common driveway, or private road, is proposed 't be located ro proposed a a dhIota o ®�d lots. 7 and 8. The 20 foot wide common driveway would b ownership Private street tract that would be 25 feet in width. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Community pcEveloMaent Cho Chapter 18.50 contains standards for the R -4.5 zone A single - family detached residential u „pit is a Permitted use in the zone. Detached single - family resideittir l lots is the zone must comply with thtt following dimensional requirements: Minimal lot size Average minimum lot width Front setback Garage setback. Interior lot side setback Corner yard setback Rear setback Maximum building height 7,500 ,®aware feet 50 f14et 20 feet 20 feet 5 feet 15 feet 15 feet 30 feet develop e 0 A lot meets the basic standards e lar access lot etandard it ' pm fit. . if, it has a north -south dimension of 90 feet or more and has a front lot line that is oriented within 30 degrees Of a true sash -we0t axis. A subdivision complies with the basic requirement if 80% or more of the newly created lots Meet or exceed this standard, . Chapter 18.92 contain-6 etandatdor for dens tyd The nui r as dwelling unit+ pill mi\ ted is based on the net development ayes:, excluding een3ftive land ,areas and latiti, dedicated for g.iblic made p , p . � gate roa .. ; � , � + or mks � ox for ri� �+3wayd. To d�eterMe this xiumbc�r'�cif lots, divide the net dalaelopment area by the minimum psi. 1 ize permitted, by the zoning district. HEARINGS OFFICER - SOS 91 -0017 -3 MATTHEW p ARC AGE mew F • y . •q •' w Chapter 18.96 states that the lot area for a flag let shell be provided.; entirely within the building site area exclusive ee - any acceBeway. In addition, this Chapter ; provides that the develoPee r f a flag lot may determine the location of the front and rear ,,,girds of the lot, provided that no side .yard setback may be less than 10 feet. . Chapter 18.98 provides special building height restrictions for flag lots. �. Chapter 18.108 contains access standards. private streets or driveways y permitted P g vary units subject vows s are e�ritted to serve a to six 'dwelling to pavement 'width and improvement standards that ry with the number of dwelling units served. won driveways serving two pavement 20 feet within residences access ` tract. Turns h of Turnaround areas are tdences must have. a minimum avetiaent w,E.dt a minimum 25 foot wide excess c� 15 required for private exc in length. e ®treats in feast 7. Chapter 18.150 requires a permit and contains standards for removal of trees having a trunk 6 :.nchee or more in diameter four pe permit for tree feet above the ground on undeveloped land. A P removal must comply with the following criteria: The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; to construct proposed b. . have to be removed w The trees $3 applicant's improvements or to otherw�.s�i utilize tYne� prcperty in a reasonable manner; a. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; d. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space: o. The aesthetic y etic character in � tree removal; ilaxanot be v�.st�.ad.l,. adva rsely affected by the t f « New vegetation planted by the applicant, ..if aay, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut acne standards for subdivision of ea 4ce�l.a into more lots. To ro ��ed, a prelim 8. Chapter 18.160 font R nary Plat must comply .... be, app 4 Cdr with the following criteria a. The proposal must comply with City's compr ehencaive Plan the appli and t;aia . le zoning g ordinance and other applicable and ordinances and regulations; b. The proposed Plat . name must not plc...a. tive an d must otherwise satiefy the o f �` C ad per 9g; NEAP LINGO OFFICER SUB 91-001/ -• MATTABW P1 GE ''4 The °trent° and r°ads must be laid out so as to conform to the plate of s3ubdiviEE.ans and maps ; of partitions or eubdivieins3 already aptroved for adjoining property as to 'fthe general direction ion and in all other Zs,mpeota " un3.ens y to modify; :te city determines it is in the lip �.ntereet, t the street or road pattern . • Chapter 18.164 contains standards for streets and utilities;. a. Section 18.164.030(h) requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classificatio ► of the street. b. Section 18.164.030(E) requires a local street to have a winimum 0 -foot r.ight -of -way and 34-foot paved section between curbs and sidewalks. Section 18.164.030(F) states that where necessary to give t a aatisfacto division of future ., cw access or Permit � r adjoining land, Streets shall be extended to the boundary line of the tract to be subdivided. In addition, a reserVn p dedicated strip and barricade are �' ed off-Site. h� end of a street that can be extended d. Section 8.164.030(M) requires local street grades3 of 1g% or leas. e. Section 18.164.060 prohibits lot depth from being more than 2i times the width and requires at least 25 feet of frontage on a Street rePt other than an alley. f • Section 18.164.0 djoining all local 70 requires sidewalks �� residential streets: g Section 18.164.090 requires sanitary se4er service. h. Section 18.164.100 requires adequate urovisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements for stoLla drainage facilities. • A l iggt le Cmm g.Ohen g ve Plait , Polk a E r . Polioy 2.1.1 provides the City will aeSure that citiSen± provided an opportunity to participate in aril p iaees of the planning and development revietr proceaS: w po1,icy 4�: � 1 r otridey that all Beve l o i ant withi tt the t gard urban p i annn g area shall soa p A� with Hpp �ir�bl e . sder alp atate end tegiohall cater quality atandar0e, y will .require . d a diti on +of develo 7 1.2 r o� l that to l c tni cer es ter, and sth dar+ainage cevelop sent tip sr t es will. be provided and dean... ed to cit.�. s t4.dardEE and bttirli.ti placed t radar t~U ind lNGs oppIcEf :; std 91 -0017 - MhtTRKW PARK dp • Policy 7.3.1 provides the City will coordinate water' services with water df,stricts. • Policy 7.4.4 requires, all new development to be connected to an approved s ani tary sewer system. eta . Policy 8.1 .1 provides the City will play for a Safe and efficient street and roadway system that sieettai.current needs and anticipated future growth and deve1opnnent • Polic ► 8. ;. provides the City will reggire as a precondition of approval thazi ae Development abut a dedicated t re t or have other a z !: .•ate access; b. Street. right -of -way Shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; pe atcti,on of the streets, Curbs and sidewalks to City �. � sidewalks s�tanc��r�3s within the c. The �� ®veto r shall commit to development. • The developer shall participate in the Improvement of existing streets, curbs, as11 ' sidewalks to the extent .of the development's impacts; • Street improvements shall be vede and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traf %ic hazard. IV NPO S AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed tae P roposal and offers the following comments: S� I • Streets - The site has access from S.W. 81st Avenue Which is under the jurisdiction g The in rs e lion of the city of Tigard. S.W. SwW. 81st Av�nu� is classified as a local street. The follo g' nim requ irements apply to local st r eet 1 - ,. ra �©men . 50 feet of right -way, 3 4 f eet of p ave�n<, and curb eed sidewalks on both Sides of the Street. Currently S.W. 81st AVG. is unit aproved along te frontage a'f the development exceppt for. apprroximatel 2 o 26 ft,et of paVewent Thee applieant is proposing. to install hale street i rbvements to ]local street standardt6 .. . ar from eevetaJl propert y Vi ers There ha® been sos interest to the south to force a local improvement district ;i%.1':A�v • Thfie process id in a very preliminary stage and the city's Engineering nep i eiat has been providtng aesisteede and titOttld$ T 00. `PAdtbi p information , 4 about the.' lo.I oD. �roc:eca) o' hers reg Ost. The preliminary plat proposes an east -west street' et' (which would also be classified as a local Street) tl�� t would sstuM to the western property line. This ®tom ' has beer; 'aligned so as provide ` for an additional, five feet of eideyard Setback Tor Lot. ;l9 La Mancha' Estatea when the street is extended (this lot would then °be ome a corner . lot) a . The applicant proposes to install foil street: improvements to 'Peal street standards. A private street is ProPdaed to serve lots 7 and 8; the private street shall, meet design e`rtand:itde Based on the findings presented' above the applicant should be retired to de the followings ,. Dedicate right - ofdway an install full street cal. ip rovt:'lenta for the local internal street; p ' i 8 • Provide and install the private street to city standards for private streets serving t o lots; 1 r the PLrePert;A F . For S.W. 81st: (1) Dedicate additional right -o; -way to meet local street standards; and (2) Financially secure for the construction of the halm -- street improvements and, if ':pct installed as Part of a ]Gol.Do project, install said improvements. sewes.� s e Sanitary There is an exising 8 inch public sanitary sewer line located in s.W. 01 ,,It which could sere this rite« The applicant p r",� sia to connect and extend existing life to serve this develd ent and any development adjacent to this propetym • Stogy Drainage: The appliaant is propat►►d'iag to extend an ex,iat&ng ®tote sower line . orated in S «'w. 81st Avenue The System hat 1 thr appli.c p , . ng to cc anect to was i ns a eadota . ant `id re d s,. pare.± hf the im' rovemea�te required for the Taxe subdivision. The syat2 was installs to accommbdate thin at d vleion� 'and future develop "ent i Lthin the drainage basins baited ;upon full dlevelopment. Ilk the this of the pre -°apgVidatiotnaeetxg tul .ng (see inforleatlon prov'id applic�a:at, the' � ;�+eva �' 'belcw� c3isti:g with 'atr alit fac3.i:itiesiasl' arnot�r BEAAING8 GFFIc8R - 8U8 0i -00i7 PiATT1104lNWkit to- • ad implemented and therefore it as not poesib1e for staff to ii forus the applicant' o engineer to provide for such facilities, After receiving the application, the applicant's engineer had bee: contacted and le a sre :ef the hew ruling and how it wire 1Je adeleistered p ffectiue December 1, .x,991,, the City is required to comply with a new requirement o2 the State Environmental Quality Co!<mmif lion (E Q0). TPiei EQC is requiring that all new development that add additional'' impervious service area, within the boundaries of the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) must construct a water quality treatment facility. Previously, developments without a snitabes site for construction quality a t�:uctioan of water treatme�at facilities were allowed to pay , a fee in lieu of on-site water alit treatment, with the fees intended to be used to consstri ct regional water quaY!,i ry treatment facilities. ' :equirenent The Engineering ��, ��aartisnent feels that the new a. many r developments, not is inappropriate, �'�r �nan sa..�al�. devela ents�s, it is rto feasible to build an ornbofte Eacilitiee. Construction of au erous small facilities m ,y create maintenance emoblems fer the e cities and U A. Eoweverr we have no oboice but to enforce this new requirement. Effective December 1sto <, e Calf must require the facilities or be in violation of State regulations. issue was n This a.e not addse ®seca in our earlier staff reports, as The Engineering Department expected the issues to be resolved between USA and the 1 between tQC We are still hopeful that the issue will be resolved within the next three months. Therefore, the applicant should he required to install a water quality facility as a condition of development approval; but we recommend that the City Engineer be allowed to waive or amend this condition of, approval if the EQC regulations are amended. 4. The City of Tigard Building Division has commented that a demolition permit must be obtained prior to destroltlion or moving s£ the existing structures on the site. In addition, the Su Ll ing Division has commented storm drain and easement shou required mmented that a ld be for lot 8. Also, the proposed common drive shoul6 either; be installed prior to issuance of building permits for lots 1 and 8, or a satisfactory monetary perfe,ethanc= assurance shall be posted guaranteeing proper insAccellation prior to the i.,"suance of occupancy permits.. Construction of the common drive shall tie inspected by the Engineed ing Division inspectors,. 4 e Tigard School District 23J has reviewed the proposal Wed has noted that the p.. 8 development h attendance areas of Phil Lewis Elemaienta' School Fowler Junior' High Sc proposed develaa-� ent lien within the ,ry o School, and the Tigard Senior High School. The proposed development is projected to generate the following' aidifiom..,al enrollment at those 3chr. ol�. 5 students e n. t® a:... , t �+ phi', Lewis is Elementary School; 2 stud�a at Jr. and 1 student at Tigard sigh school, ehe SohoolClat ict otee that school ca p acities !EARING«s ®FI' ICER -- SUE 91 0017 - AATTW PARK . PAGE 8 are Projected to be exceeded as a result of this - proposed develareeent and other recesatl.y reviewed si;id approved developments within those attendance areas. The District,' notes , that core facilities of the schools are insufficient to be able to coneidar portable' classroom additions. Additional ocho ©1 capacity may he provided b y other options under cmsideration by the school district, inclui9ing: grade level reconfiguration, rescheduled school year, boundary adjj Uotments, double shifting, busing o under - utilized` faOi.iities, ` future bond measures leading to construction of new facilities and other school housing 'captions . NPO #5 hasp reviewed the proposal and has noted no Objections or comments. The City ,f Tigard Public Work° Department, 'POE;, Northwest Natural Gas, ,tdetropaitan T1rea Communications CoMMisssio i and the Tigard hater 11istrict have reviewed the proposal and have offered no cotele><.te or o1 jections. The applicant should contact these utility providers regarding their regUiremonts and fees foy? utility installationm • EVALUATION OF REQUEST' Comoliance with Commuai t i evel.omenak _ de proposed subdivision l Standards of the �.. The ra seed euod.�iea.o>�' complies with the >a�te R-4.5 zoning district (Code Chapter 18.50) because the lbtszi are intended to be Used for single family detached dwelling unitss. The 7,500 to 8,850 square foot; lots are consistent With the Minis-Mit 7,500 square foot minimum let site of the zone and the average lot width requirement Of 50 feet. 2 Proposed lots 13 and 14 are exclUded from the solar artces s calculation as the 20 percent Of lots that need not be , coneide fed within the solar access caslculatict -A. All other pro3 Osed lots meet the bailie' ,solar access requirement bedauSe these lots have a front Sot aline that is wfthi,n , j0 degrees of true .. n6it%- seieath and a� ciinim nn no :h -south dimension Of 90 feet. Ts et force moue than, the regdired 80 percent of the proposed lots meet the 'basic eoiar design standard of Code Chapter 18.88m • The ptepeaed subdivision complies With tie density city etamdards of Cha pt er 18.92 bedauSte th e 1.00 ; 105 gg t»ate i?aet 'net deVelo able area of the Elite rafter d du: kid f s for right of -i� ay d® dice Lion and the private street tract) yields an mp0artUii3lty for ].4 s5 dwellitIO 11U t�zix ��iatieati fam 1y r ea3denti L`lot�Ore p rop ed• 4 • The special flag let setback and building ' ,!eight reeilliteinentd of Chapters '18:96 and lA • 96 would be applied , thredoh }she building ' permit pre.:e0as to ; lcta 7 and 8: HEAFIINGs oFgxcia a Sun 91, 0 017 MATTHEW ria C 'AG ti: • I�r Cta . The 25 foot wide access tract providing access to bits 7 and 8 is con ist ,Int with Chapter 18.108's requirement for a minimum 25 foot wide ac�.en® area necessary for a shared drt rsway serving two r, � residences. . Because the common elriveway wou'.d ot- be greater than 150 feet iv length, no turn around area is required. • Chapter 18 .150 requires that the member of trees over six inches e coi struction be in diameter that are removed Burin :,; the course of minimised(. The s8 frontage s a number latst �hvenue fronta a of the site contain of cedar trees The applicant's statement notes that , retention of these trees has been considered but that it appears that needed street improvements would make retention difficult or imposaib , Instead, the applicant will attempt to move these trees elsewhere on the, mite. Most Of the other trees on the efts are presumably intended to be reMove tl. We encourage the applicant to spare as many of theme trees as possible, Retention of as many of the mature treed as possible will add great ly to feel of this g grading ng should developing ne neighborhood. �o tree removal ox, site gram; be allowed to occur prior to Planning Division review and approval of a tlene removal perm it . The proposed eeihdiVision is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.160 losca,use ae The proposed ®Cacrli.visi Bar, ca....pl,es with the ComprenOne3,v'e Plan Map's J ow rieaaelty Rerident;tal designatic'n'e del city opportunity for the site as well as with the applicable plan policies, the regulations of the 1W-4.5 zone, and other applicable regulations The proposed aaamne of the subdivision, Matthew Park, is not duplicatLve of any other plat recorded in Washington county; o. LW ga 'zlewi Street and the oommoa driveway will provide for adequate and safe acceac to the tote ik'. the proposed ssxbdivieton. These Streets wt] 1 be required to be improved to local' .street: and pritrate the street x'e1�.�aa aids . plat i.iad�.cate of thin streets on p j p appropriate i niprovemen,t s. The tequ, i ed rightf c f -way dedication and improveuterats to the cite' d S(W 81at Avenue frontage will iamettive traffic safety alorig 'china etrttch of this existing atreet: The proposed aubdividlon is oan®iStent k, ii ' h the requi tomo.itts of ,.p be consistent with these Chapter 18.1�x�, or Dare be anocli:fi.ed t� requirements, becaube . The applicant will be reguired to dedicate additional right -of 4 ay for -t#ad improve the ail 8ist Av" icnue frontage of the site to local street Standards. • The applicar is preilm nary Plans for devo1oping internal subdivision stireete' are cbnaistent lath Code ,ataneardd fo:: local, stredt weal.. tYa # grade, and est s a: HEAEINGS C'U'FICER - SOB 9i-0611 MATTHEW FAQ PAGE 10 rr ` of* co 4. The proposed lots are consistent with Code atantard2 for maximum lot depth-to-width ratio and other lot dimensional standards The final plat should include a non- access reserve strip prohibiting access from SW Matthew Street to the parcel to the west. Compliance With Comprehens ivp Plelp Policies 1. The subdivision is consistent with Policy 2.1.1 because notice of the application and the public hearing on this item was provided to the neighborhood Manning organization and to owners of property in the vicinity of the site., ` The proposed site has been pccted : *ith a sign noting that a land use or development application on this site was pending. In order to comply with Policy 4.2.1, condition r are warranted. to q, developer erosion control plan, ensuring compllanceewith erosion o control standards for the Tualatin Liver Satin as part of the grading permit application and to construct an on -site water quality facility as required by the Oregon Environmental. Quality Commission and USA regulations. 3. This subdivision proposal crag plies with Pc*licy 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.44 because the applicant will extend public sewer and water s. ilation of phone, electricity, p and cable television e l ne underground insta steno,® to this site a a y 4 The subdivision proposal complies with Policy 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the p) po Improvements •, .. standards for subdivision will be consistent with City to of Tigard tss t kndar within the lcal streets. Vi. CONCLUSION AND RECOI k RATION '1 he Planning )i:visiOn concludes tha�. the proposed an��,bdivis ion ,, With . 9 .. promote general P ity and will not bey : i+£icantl._ will romotc the eneral waal£are of the City g land uses provided that modifications, de�y detrinente.Z nor injuriouani to slrroundin ve1op ent that occurs after this decision complies) with applicable local state and federal laves. Staff recommends approval of Subdivision proposal SUB 911 -001.7 for the proposed . Matthew Park subdivision subject to the c:onditien which follow. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ILL CONDIU,IONS SHE ?•4: BE SATISFIES AND PuBtatc.I0BoVElittatts SHALL . BE C O PLETED OR C0 Pt;ETI0k Sett SE FINA►NC LL ASSURM) PRIOR TO THE 1SSUANcE oW ANY° PERMITS FOR coN6entocTION uF ....... .. ... � � ° TFYE - SUBG1[iiISTO1V1. Staff contact tot all retoomex dec1 conditions is Chris DaV ies of the EnginO eying DePartuiehtt tri39 4171, unlea:s otherwise noted ) . OFxICER SUB 91-4011 TTgEW lAR.K b � • PAGE CD Fol S. a THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION'S PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY: ▪ The final plat shall be limited to the creation of fourteen lots.' .All lots shall be fully dimensioned on t /.ra plat and shall be conaiatent with R -4.5 zoning district dimensional requirements. The final plat Phan comply with Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 92, City of Tigard Community Develo ent Code Chapter 18.160; and. Washington County standards; • The plat shall provide for the dedication of all necessary right - of -way for the public streets within the subdivision; and The applicant shall submit plans, obtain, City approval and provide financial assurance for the construction of the following public 1.mprovements: . All public streets within the subdivision as specified in the following conditions ii. storm drainage system Thesis improv+stiemato shall. be des ed and constructed in accordance kilth _the rec u3.semente of the qty of Ti arc_ The imponelonts shall tie_ comnlet d and a` � tad by the City „within the v a frame s»ecified in the puS1io assurance contract. 2. All existing buildings ahall be removed or el.ae shall comply with the building setback requirements for the R-4.5 zoning ,Yistrict. A demolition permit shall be obtained prior to removal of. any existing buildings. STAFF INTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division ision (639- 41.71) , A minimum 25 foot wide access tract, with 2t) feet of pavement shall be provided for the purpose of serving lots 7 aad 8. The private common ; Section City local street standards dritr�a� sec�_on t�tnall be constructed to 4 The common driveway shall be signed for no parking on one side. A sign shall he posted at the intersection of the driveway with SW Matthew Street noting that the driveway is privately owned and maintained. B. A, joint use and maintenance agreement shall be recorded for every lot sharing a common driveway. Common accesawaye shall either be paved prior to the issuance of building Permits for lots to be served or else a satisfactory monetary performanse assurance shall be provided. STAPP CONTACT Brad Rost, BuildlAg Division (639- 4171) .. i Adequate site drainage to the public, atormw l] ater drainage a ►8tt.� than: � be provided for all lots. Z tAtivate storm drain and ' drainage eaeet ent :shall be provided for proposed lot B, unless it Can be demonstrated hOW else dzsina g a thz p iot oan drain to a public storm draii age 6'104.E-tole Easements-Shall be provided where a private storm drain line crOdeee other late. A o n !Maintenance agreement shall be recorded with 66dl lot accest3ing a common private. storm drain line„ STAFF CONTACT: J3 ad Roast, H:nildimng Division (639.4171) HEARINGS OFFICER SUB 1KATTH.. MATTHEW PARE PAGE 1� w' f 3 a A maintenance and eccssa agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard fornw for all storm drain outfall,e. The agreement shall be referenced on and become Part of all applicable parcel deeds The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prin►r to recording. The appl.i, e�, q\ ality� facility meeting the So , o�,a,`tt shall install Order N. 91-47 as approved and a by the p Unified Sewerage A enc " of Pp by 9 Y qty. The City Engineer waive this r, airement to the extent allowed the regulations of f �aehin on ++coup may wal �' by � the Environmental Quality OommiosicAn d Unified Sewerage Agency as they exist at the time the Public Improvement plans are approved and. installed. The applicant shall be required to install half -- street improvements along the site's frontage on S.W. `� the Council ;i.nipr ©v event district shall be formed and approvedalternatively, cby a unncil that includes the property in this proposed development., Two (2) seta of detailed public im roar 3A. P p enent plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted fos preliminary review to the Engineering Department. The public improvements shall be designed consistent with the requirements of Code Chapter 18.164. seven (7) seto of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimated all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be ovbmi ted for final review approval (NOTE: tP are addition an drawings required by the Building Division and should inclu a sheets relevant to public improvements.' Ax: erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public 11 • improvement dreaw .nga. The plan shah. P .. - pe � 4 to "'Erosion Control Plane Technical. Guidance Handbook, November , O 39 0 A grading plan shall be sutmit €�� showing the existing ' and proposed 12. g „ 9 P red show contours and typical finished floor elevations on each lot, including . elevations at 4 different corners of the floor plan tied to the top of curb elevations as shown on the public improvement plans- 13. The applicant shill mare an appointment for a pre - construction meeting with the C'ity of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of the publicimpreivement plans }Alt before starting Work on the sites The applicant, the applicant's engineer and dO ntra.ctor small be required to attend this meeting priot to receiving the approved plena and p+ rmlte,,, 14. The applicant shall subMi:t to the City of Tigard Engineering DePartraeAt a mylar copy of the subdivision play, after recording. ". y removal, .. : 3wa property >nu ®t b : approved by the 15. through a .proval of Fin, tree r relocation o#� th pp . ,, p f a tree removal and a royal of the grading plan Trees o.; r Shall be removed Planning only as necessary to iconstruct streets, utilities, and re ' -.: The v+sr six inches in di.aiarete i` �a . li�cant .rOiride for and ,se Planning Aiviesio;�n may rec;ui.re that tkle � -� P p' � oridt to review the plans for grading and tree protct. cn. IE.. AR I, GS nE PICEH sU8 01-0017 MATTHEW PARK The applicant, ehall protect .,those, treen •which .are o be `:p eaery mark .n a 4 fencing the roetli ie,c of those :, area ire Order„ t ► protest , +e tees ' 'a114. roots re the: effects of construction "a►ct,i�rities. r �.� si©x� iresoribe> special, appl��,can�" n �auc3�o�idt �r, tae Plar�ri�,i�r�. �?iv►�. ,?�� . � , prob ativa . measures► .f or tip -es' to be retainer& on .: > ► copy of the tr69,,temairal permit and approved grading plan shall be grail able on--a tc during all tree removal . and grading activities. $TA '3k , ocost 4CT: Jerry offer; I.Flatirting 1 viraiOf ,(639'04171) • suBpiv1SXON APPROVAL L BE VALID ONLY IF THE FINAL PLAT IS RE . EO WITHIIN EIGHTEEN 24ON .'HS OF TH13 EFFEcTIvE DATE OF TEIs DEcxsION. .:0$4i144$ dFFICER St�En 1-+oc xi 1t T i J� LEGIBILITY STRIP me NEM Digital data it gap reprises tette; ebmpilad by the C1t7_ at 3igara atiiitiog'GsGgrac ytie 1cleraotiee System is seftcasc. 'agar —. matt.ao partroyod iafa may ao isteadad to be %load with oddittooat teCtialeat aid /er ate rpretotirr dot • as deteraired -b st :�� the City oC - itgard 1111111111:: 1111111: -5S-;: - {YPSSbii?) 400 (12faS /$t) N O R T E ALPS ENGINEERING INC.. ENGINLV RING A DEVELOPMENT SERVICES a SURVEYING December 3, 1991 "MATTHEW PARK" APPLICANTS STATEMENT Z I 1 Tax Nap 2S1 12BC Tax Lots 800 and 801 Area = Approximately 3.0 acres ZONING R-4.5 (7 , 500 SF min. size lots) PROPOSAL: into 14 Lots ranging' in size from 7,500 SF to E� 650 S e property get® Pr ®pc�sa]. is to divide the d Two lots ( 7 and 8) in the northwest corner�of the site would gain access via a p rivate street. DENSITY CALCULATION: Gross site area = 340 acres x 43,560 survey) L Streets actual s (including p .rivate streets) Net Site Arc a Divided by 7 , 500 SF 130,680 SP 21,575 SP 109,105 SF 14' 0 5 units SOLAR ACCESS: 12 comply with the basic requirement, t is, having at least 90 feet of north -south lot dimension and a front lot --line oriented within 30 degrees of a true east -west line • This equals 86%. • CEDAR TREES 1L 1Y- O G S 0 W 81st AVE NUE e • Pp� t alnt pry �,pd00s to relocated most Cedar . tree; that sites .W 81�t Avenue f orate a It has b .en guq A 1a.c itt g . .• a .... ed salon W S 1 t Aver e that • could he moved west an o der to gave the tree. E . the sa.�ev+ralk �o be cora�tsuc e�ted . owe�re�` s ,ut app x that.... ,ruction ' • e • di r, curb 0 ..., ,. ay.n c lwil1. require r ° �ra1. .Chere��r the a lac t ao p poses to elocat € �I�st of the ees heha,in.a the o n tructes • sidewalk and •to ether parts o f the site 1 600.sow. OAI �► PORTLA D. OR C�Gi�1 97Z2). 503 -452 800 FAX 50452 -804 p PLAZA ti This type Of tree relocation *Tagil ion with trees, of a similar size successfully ac ompliehec the ' reoen develoPMent of Morning Till Phase g. STETS AND UTILITIES: The 'cevelopznent plan includes an east'wes : street that stubs to the Aleeit property line This stub has been .aligned such to prow .de for an additional five feet of sideyard setback for Lot! Se IA Mancha Estates. This lot will become a corner lot once the str et is extended. A private will bey identical in terms of crossect on �/ to Private the � Proposed to serve c in Ashford Oaks no. . �hi�l,�r developed � rs o� ��` one Sanitary sewer and storm - drainage Will be extended into the site from existing systems in S.W. 81st Avenue. These existing sys- tems the basin, accommodate this and future development within teas have been sized to ac�o NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION 05 In spite of the holiday season, NPO #5 met on December 18, 1991 with a 75% attendance rate Chair dopkins was excused and Vice- chairman Bill Bieker convened the meeting. Present were Orm. Doty, Sharon Takahashi and staff Liz 'Newton Minutes of the November 20, 1991 meeting were approved as mailed. Liz Newton announced that two applicants were being interviewed pp , pr p both ,ion and a a owed, or in the process. we hoped to have them bot U5 by the ,opening meetings of the new year. New business 1-. MLP 91 -0013: 15565 SW 79th A ellue, zoned R -12 (Applicant requests minor land partit'.on approval to divide 1eOp .94 re parcel cel into 3 parcels of �,0, OfilO, _ 20,000 and 10,000 feet th the each) of information Wi packet given, we had no objection. 9 2. SUB 9A-0017: 14885 SW 81st Avenue, zoned H 4.5 (Applicant requests subdivision approval to divide an approximately 3 ,Acre site into 14 lots, size ranges from 7,500 to 8,600 settw feet) objection to ;.his subdivision We saw n ,� as it falls in the S ,, _.. zoned - (A allowable guidelines. 3 . SDR 91 OC321 : 7000 SW Durham Road, I�pl i cant. Site Development Review approval ~t to construct two requests S p dock high, tilt up concrete bui s dings of 33,000 and 33,750 square feet with related site improvemente) We have concerns with tr ‘f f is as these bui tdir, Js will impact an area already congested. A large portion o,r tthe building lot has been fill leveled, which should warrant extra attention. These were the only qu estions posed. �n S D E 91-00. 19, 7150 SW S r Street APP laca (Applicant requests site t e deve lopment review approval for modification to add 5 , 75 2 square foot office bui lding with related site improve- ments) 5: RNo objection j encountered. eviewedfinaldecision on new ZC 91 -0009 We had a question asked regarding the Knee property and what r,�- question g 9 y _^ y .. hope., is transpiring there in the vicinr.t• of the �, reek. We some staff can provide itformation. With no further business, w e adjourned ap pi fi, .� i r ate llr .40 ,m: IdEMORANDU}.4 CITY OE TIGARD, OREGON TO: Jerry Offer December 19, 1991 !ROM: Chris Davies, Developmeat Review Engineer . SUB 91 0 017 NE IMEYER, /]EDWARD D r t`io .,e The applicant proposes develop on a 3.00 acre site. pp cant ro ones to d.�ve1© 14 lots o E'ir�dinc�s 1. Streets The site has access from S.W. 81st Avenue which is under the jurisdiction of 'the City of Tigard. S .W. 81st Ave. is classified as a local ' street and has the following minimum 50 - feet o right -of -Way with 34 feet of requirements: Y pavement, curbs and sidewalks on both sides of the street, y unimproved along the frontage of Currently S.W. �lst Ave. is u the de/eloPment except for approximately 22- ,26 feet of pavement The applicant is proposing to install half-street improven3'ts at local street standards. There has been some interest, from the property owners to the south, to form a l Improvement Local ~� vement District (L.I.D.). The process is in a very preliminary stage and the city's engineering department has been ...rovdn assistance and infox.mation (about the L.I.D. process) p,13r the property owners request The developmen :pla includes an east -west street (which would d also be classified as a local street that stubs to the west property. •l,�ne . This stub has been aligned such to provide fc r an additional five feet off' sideyard setback for Lc 5, La Ma 1 become ^ a c^ ll • " orn��o insta�..i ft�he ' ,ire t is extend d) s The applicant proposes t street Improvements to local street stand rd:a scree propos � ..Y ed •to se � - �� p . vote p r shall meet desi n stand.ardsve lots 7 and 3 t e �� i�, st eet g dings present pp . t should be + . on the find bed above t2�e a lics.:a Based re u red to Flo the followings ERII G C OMMEN�S St.1 B 91 -1.7 04.1N DYER /EDW S l Dedicate right-of-way and install full street . improvements for the local internal street; • Provide and install, to city .standards, ';he private street; ▪ For S.W. 81st: (1) Dedicate additional right-of-way to meet local street standards; and (2) Financially secure for the construction of the half - street improvements and, if not installed as part of a L.I.D. project, install said improvements. . Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer line located in S.W‘. 81 s l;i which could serve this site. Thus applicant S w and the existing line to verve this p n extend development I✓ and Ca y future development adjacent to this p property. • Storm Drainage: The applicant is proposing to extend an exi We feel that the new requirement is ,inappropriate For many small devel.oprents, it is not feazihhle : to build an on -site facility. construction of nuaerOus small facilities will create maintenance problems for the cities and USA. However, we have no choice. Effective December 1st, we �� ►last require the facilities or be in violatioa of State r.e gul ti This issue was not addressed in our earlier staff reports, as p be resolved between USA. and the EQC. we expected the issue t. We are still hopeful that the is:Jue will br,, re:aolved within the next three months. Therefore, the applicant should be required to x nstall a water quality facility; but we recommend that the City C y Engineer be allowed to waive this .. requirement if the regulations are amended. Recd 7.+raitdo tion si.L A; CONDITIONS SHALL BE SAT I SFI L� OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO REC0� Z�C THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. applicant it quality :cant shall install a water qualit. facility meeting 1. The ' of as pproved nandOr��:.�rNfo 91-47 o Washington the requirements of Resoiuta.a Sewers a Agenc 4 pp and adopted by the Unified g County. T he City Engineer may waive this requirement to the 1 . i J d of the Environmental Quality Cotmis iOnow nd. by ified� regulations they , the Agency e exist at th Cammis � �.....v and 1� enc �� as and installed. time the Public Improvement plans are app required to install Half - street ?. The applicant Shall be ,,� frontage of S 1+�',., 81st � or a Local t roveme�zts along tY`i�. frnir h a.mp p the City p shall formed i roved by Im �:; o�JFri!ent District the apr� this ° proposed Count that includes property development 3 Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans 'and profile public L con>truction drawings shall be submitted for prel trinary revieW to the Engineering Dep t (1) sets of approved ► � aY: C�i�IP•ilt . Seven �= the drawings and one (1) itemized construction co. t estimate all prepared by Professional. Engineer, shall be s ubmitted for itorY final review and approva.i (NOT , these plans ; are in adc ..pea ~ . d by th,�¢ Building ' and should �, ry by r Division s.n to any drawings requited only Include sheets relevant to public irprovements . An erosion control p l an shall be provided part t of the pub1 improvement drawings . The plan s "Erosion conform to Conti 01 Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989» 1'trs;INFJRYh1C COMMENTS: SUS 91-17 NEIHEYER /EDWARDS eAl i • A grading plan shall be submitted showing ' dhe existing and proposed contou'f. s and typical finished floor elevations on each lot, including elevations at 4 different corners of the floor plan tied to the top of curb elitillations as shown on the public improvement plans. • The applicant shall rake an appointment for a pre- const, " Ctior meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after .approval. of the public iMPxOvemeni= Plans but Z �fore starting work on the site. The app1ic ` ac. , the ,applicant's engineer. and contractor shall be required to attend this meeting Prior to receiving the approved, plans and permits 7. The applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard Engineering p y p .4ubcivision Department a mylar copy of the �eC ordod a Plat. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD Bs AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS CODE; S NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. �F THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CUpB, THIS I 1. SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement A. Before City approval is Certified on the final issued 1 r d before approved sl1on p ins are b y the City, the Subd�vicerohal+ E with the City Engineer 1 �xecate and file an agre�.�tlen, which all required, specifying the period within improvements and repairs . shall be completed; and ▪ ' Include in the agreement .provisions that if h work is not comp1etd within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the subdiviUer • Th stipulate i p i p ..1'�" shall St so fees and The agreement be required to be paad Viand may also de Posits as ma be qu r : , p improvements in f the construction of the provide for t ., stages and or the ext. n t. extension of time under s3�w.c�.i.. conditions therein stated in the contract. P SECTION 18.160.180 Bond As required '' r agreement � :160.1'0 ®subdivider performance by Section 1 zer shall file with the agreement an assurance " p supported by one 0C the following! 1, n irrevocable letter of credit financial institution authorized to transact, � business in the State Of Oregon; ... SUB, 91 17 ENCIIVF��`txN(� ��M�ivTS � • `I lig WI surety bond executed by a i:,, Surety company authorized '° to transact., business a.rr the State; of Oregon whrich remains in, force until the surety companv it notified by the City in writing that it may be teminated; o ▪ Cash. • The subdivider shall furnish to the City ',Ingineer, an itemized improvement esti.rtate, certified by aP registered civil engineer ®. to ` aaliist the City Er ginger 'in calculating the amount *of the performance assu'ranoe .' ` r The subdivider shall not .` cause termination of nor allow expiration of said guarantee: without having :'first secured Nritte i authoriza'tion from the City. . SECTION 18.160. 190: Filing and Recording ,.., ., da .,s of the . City review and approval, the �s G�ii.hzn 60 � Y p ,� my for applicant .cant hall su' for the County rOf Count fficial areas required by Chapter signatures Y ea b -.ORS, �, r Gap 92. • Upon final recording With the County, the appiCailrC hall subm ,t to the City a mylar copy of the recorded final plat . SECTION 18.162.080 Final plat Application Submission Requirements Three c' o i L , prepared by a land the partition plat A- r or engineer licensed p: act ce in Oregon, and ►7'l;lrve o �' necessary data or narrative • The partition plat afid dat4. or narrative sb�, ll be dra ft to the �narnux St and ards set fo rth by the Oregon Revised statutes (ORS 92.05), i washrhq'tort Couni .; and by the City of Tigard. +� T1E RI TG CO1 i T5. S id 9 11 14$TOSYzR'�nplO P,,,, SECTION 18.162.110 Centerline Monum ntation t monument Eo, 1equirements A. Centerline 'Monumentati0n for all Major Partitions: 1. The, centerlines of all street and roadway rights-0f-�' way shall be rronuimented as prescribed in ORS. 92.060 (2) before City acceptance of street improvements tinder the following specifications: a, Centerline monuments are required to have monument boxes coxi orming to City standards set for those monuments within the pavement ar0a; and a . The tops of all monument hoes sh nail be set to �•� finished pavemet grade. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILYT' IMPROVEMENT . � � a7 T�ia�e DtiRiJ �7 18.164.030 Stx.eets Z No development shall occur unless the developnie= t has frontage or approved access to a public street. Unless � otherwise indicated on an approved street plan; the street right-of-way and roadway widths shall not be less than the minimum width described below: a. Local street: R.O.W. - 50 feet Street width - 34 feet Future extensions of Streets and Reserve Strips: p dedicated A reserve strip across the end of a street shall be deeded to the City; and . A barricade shall be c onstzuctei d a ''.he end of the street by the property owners vfhieh shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost The Cti: t • shall install all street signs, relative to City sha i. traffic control and street names, as specified by the City Engineer for anydev elop�tei.t « The e cost of sins shall be the responsibility of the developer. G COMMENTS SUE Street Cross Sections . Surface, material shall be of Class C or alpha tie concrete; b . The final lift shall be placed on a new construction roadways; prior to City final acceptance of the � roadvaay however, not before 90 percent of the structures in the new development are completed unless three years have elapsed since initiation of construction in the development. c. The final lift shall. be Class S asphaltic concrete as defined by A.P.W.A. standard specification di* No ". r" " inches in o lift shall be l� mss, than �.•�1/'� thickness. 18.164.120 Utilities 1. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required • y q red for electric! communidationl, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface '- surface mounted connection box drtd meter cabinets uwhich may be placed above ; utility _.. �, ities during .. gro ,wemporary service facn:l co s1 ,, wtion, high capacity electric lines operating at 50 000 volts or above. All improvements by the Subdivider shall installed b: , t be guaranteed as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following aptance by the City. p cce Such, guarantee shall be secured by dash deposit or ` the ' p , .. . � ICl.ent S bon x in the amount of the value of the iM rove as , iet` by the City Engineer. .. The Cash or bond shall comply with the terms and conditions of Section 180160.180. 1;r EI�CTN ERI G cosmtmTS Suk3 91•° .7 Ol yF t. P1;1W4'P.$ 1 164. 150 Installation: Preregc isite /Permit i G j. as nd division improvements, including sanitary sewers storm se e.rs , streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other revirenierat,s shall be undertaken., except after the plans therefor have been approved . a by the City, permit fee aid and permit is8ued: 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until ' the City has been notified in advance 2 If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall ;nat' be resumed 'anti? the City is notified . 18.164.200 Engineer' s Certification Required 1. The , land divider' s '. engineer shall provide , written certification of a forma provided by the . City that all improvements, , , d rk�ans%ip �� zrd' men engineering are nts, w�� nt stand of hi: � rack, prior accord with current and construction on practices, and are high g, st,��acti � '" the subdivision'" ,,• y City acceptancr, . of on s the C�.ty • improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. .... �' wggjtMf �tlw A�M�iIIySI� API.? CVED Randall Ft Wooley, City Engineer ENGINE .1NG comMENT CO S s 8 st.78 91- ,17 • . . N IMFYER EDWAilDS -, -0r aI 0 , Irk REQUEST FOR cONTS DAF s • ' Eat�tx nb r 10 1991.. FOE: Tigard Planning Departs en t Res StI XJI�18JIai N S�F A0 NA i Y i (Npo #5) , A raqpueaat for lots rang n roaii atel i 500 wind 8, 600 . cque a feet into eaacht at p roval to divide PP 4 lots ranging between +k�]3p.. ai a �P �' acre' an a roxi�ma�te ZONES R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 unite /Acro) . ' The 1t -4.5 zoning allows eing141- family detached' residential unite, public support fsc:iitieS, residential treatment homes.: fain , nan ufa ctured hoec, family day •care, home occupations, temporary use, r eidential L fuel tankc, and acc seed etruCteres among cth�r o ®e Avenue, zt h of SW Viola Street, and 14885 S Avenue I t1� 2S 9 r, ta lots 100 and 501' APPLICABLE REVIEW CRxiSTxAt Communit y DeveZd ent Gods Sections 1S. S8 and 18.160 Attached fation sue Site plied by various departments a a n agenniee and from other � report and recommendation will be prepaareei and et a of ®rtanat;�.cna avail��i�. bn , o� ,. pP e to out Staff, ®are x°t iOn will be render su on the to Pro O al 9. the n3ar futo roa. t € net with Gmnient on thia application, e� need your comments b y Dom. 19:, You "idly u3e the ®pace, puovided below o attach a separate letter to return your ante. I f,_„you are unable te ree,Wradl ,bast„ ve date ,pleas er phone the Staff contact nota>* belOw with Your CO' rents add confirM your Goaeta a at3 Lin writing an' soon to poceiblas If you ha -ve any ga6aatil)nal regard1100 thisaail matter, contact the Tigard g~ p r 1 e vw. 'itarda 01 97223. PHONE: ! WW SW Ball P3�annia� �e a� 6.79 4.`i� �: {5 XtRl�nt ' PO �aa: � '9 �� r ;!. ��5 STAFF coNTAttt Jets offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEJ , 'MAT APPLY: p v 3 one to it. . ire have reviewed the ropoaal. and ,ia�ea no ob eot3� Of OUlr off3.ce. Please coutaaCt ,_. refer to the enclosed ictter• Written OoMMentst awule .¢i..W.rmr.6n..wr.1.1■+.e.Wmw Name of Pernon coaca xentia►a0 a ..... a Phone Number: bkne/SuH91 --1 i S • TO :: �Jr REQUEST FOR COZ4 MEtUT6 DIVE: eo ar�lber 1tl.:1�91 FROM: Tigard ?fanning Department RE StIEDIVi N Sun 91 -0017 J w ffEINEYER/A,i3'WAnD�6 (NPO #5) A request for wwiww�+W..murw". "�'y 'M�+r�IM Subdivisio n approval to di ridc4 an approximately 3.00 acr o site ; into 14 ranging between approxittately 7,500 and 8,600 equare £grit ,tech. ng: ial i eb The R -4.5 zoning allows ; si ngl e -fa single-family deter hed 'a$dentfa] publio support facilities, reoidentia1 treatment homed, farming, aaanufaOtured hostaii, family fa ly day care, ome oaupatton ®, temporary use, l;eaident it luel ranks, d ay N • West of SW elst Avenue, ,south Of structures W Viola r ®4 , and x:4885 SW 81a Avenue r (W(T 1 281 12130, tax lots 800 and other mace. STii V+al Street:, . pity bevel 'nt Code Sections 801) PZwaz$ REVIEW ��a�. ►�� 18.88 and 18.160 licartanente ater t n gfno .ero !four review, Prom Atta� ed is the Site P1an and aPP and, from Other information suppled by various P information available to otar staff, a roport and rc commendati ©n will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the ;propoeSi nt near future. If you to roam ant on thie application, we need syes= arane lniette to c a rri Y r oomn�n4 Y attach uee the space provie below ark apt hc� o� Pd to please phOhe the staff con a .. . �- . .. � , Writing the oo aaas .�f ou are unable to r® ®end b t ftran your c�� aaot ®c� below with your coaNa�nta and con e an. eations rr�agardi:ng this matter, n itr n a Planning. yon. have any 25 SW Hall E] Tigard, . Planning Department, P0 80* 23397, 13 . vd. -, Ti aids Cat 972.p. PHONE: 639,4171. STAFF CONTACT: errvOffer �- PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLownsa :Emig THLT APPLY: We have reviewed the propoaa1 and 'have no OhjeatiOns td it. Please co ntact of a�iOSi g our f f Plane refer to the e1(1010 6ed ;Letter. Written C,.e nt8: flame of Person Co tinting a Phone Number: .._...� bkm/SUB91-1'7.BKM s 1 `ibbard Adrnitntstrcl%ra +Certtcr Larry 15137 S.'W. Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tel, (5031620-1620 Fa (503) 684,2296 Any, ' D P O. pox 97 rd, OR 971.1.1 C� ea ht. Comer: In response to yovir request for comments on development called Maw Pork (91- 0017) located We of &let and North of flees, the attached is emitted as it statement LEGIBILITY STRIP Column I capacity reflects the number of classrooms, portables on site, and Special Edit . tion programs: accomadatis at an individual school_ Column 2 Actual current school enrollment- kindergarten has been computed at one -half. Column 3 Current available capacity- difference of column T and column 2. Column 4 Impact of previously approved dsveiopmon a - determined by School District housing formula (see School District Housing Formula shown below) Column 5 Impact of requested development - Determined by School District housing formula. Column 6 Adjusted school capacity raq r;ment determined by the sum of lumns 2,4 and 5 and plwes developmental request in A, B or C linghtitwily %trot trim 0.48- Pre-first grade cb l re L per dwelling 0.32 Elementary eitadents per (Welling 014 intermediate stuae,fits . per dwelling 0.07 High school students per dwelling 0,53 Total school age students per dwell [n 0:07 Elementary students per dwelling- 0.03 Intermediate: students; per dwelling 0.,02. High school students per dwelling 0.12 Total school students per dwelling SrH DE5GNALl Tigard High School 1 465 Tualatin High school 1465 Ftowler Junior High 900 Twel.ity Junior High 900 Hazeibr+ook Middle SO. 800 CET Elem. 570 Mary Woodward Elem. 600 Durban Elem. 375 Templeton Elem. 510 Metzger Elem. 550 Phil Lewis Elem; 500 Byrom Elem. 600 Tualatin Elem. 600 Bridgeport. Elam. 600 TOTAL 810 1716. UNDER CONSTRUCTION 988 1051 UNDER CONSTRUCTION 516 737 385 600 513 454 652 629 755 8996 Development Number :it Units: TIGHIRD— TUHLH -IN SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 CITY f OUNTV HESIDENTIRL INPI1CT STRTE E T Matthew Park Data SInole -- Family 14 Multi Family_ _ School: Design aoi: - [Al 4 Current impact of Actinsi - Available Print' Appr t.-ged g ro1lkaent.. Ca .t act ' _ Davafio ►menus 6 aspect of usted_ School this 1 Requirement Devel ment ( Sues of cote os 2-4 Elemental Phil Lewis: Elementary ht &hod (Tigard—Sr. High) Status of School 1mpac "A" 98 8 146 1716 -251 183 For explanation of columns 1 through 6, see code on ' back sheet. School(s) r capacity* not exceeded (column 6 less than column 1) Schoo& .$) capacity exceeded- _core f t.lit1es ors sufficient to consider portal3le alditaiS cy- determined- by requirements of Uniform Building and /or City County codes. S�ffic3en � School(s) cmacity exceeded—are facilities insufficient to consider portable adiitions, Additional capacity may be provided by other options ' un r consideration by the School District which include: grade level reconfiguration, re: heduled school year , boundary adjustments,, doub s shifting, busing to - unifier - utilized:feciiities. future bond measures leading to new construction, and" other housim options. Theseoptions and statements have been prepared by Tigard-Tualatin School District Administration Staff andapproved by the Board of Dirwtors.. This school impact statement is for the above indicated d el men t,. and s valid for 20 days , Bud Hillman_ Director of Operations and Transportation (684 -2221_ REQUEST FOR COMMENTS . DATE: December :. 0 1991 FROM: Tigard Planning Department,; SUB 91-� Di IaEImEyL ED , " %d�S ( #5) A' a q..eet for Y3Ef � t��DiVit�Tl)'M S �'�..� r� ��.+ma�.�l 3 t�0 acre sits. into 14 Subdivision approval to divide an app y ° iota ranging between approximately 7,500 and 8,600 eguart feet each. R 4.5 (Re > ide 4.5. units /acre) . The R -4.5 zoning allows ZONE: � ntial, single- family detached residential unita, p blic aus rt facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured ed homes,' f a ©ere , hOme Dare occupations, temporary tine, residential structures among other d 14885 SW L CA A ON: West of SW 81st i�,�►a &ue, south of SW' Viola Street, venue (WCTill 281 128er tax lows 800 and 801) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections one 15.88 and 18.160 Attached is the Site l an and applicant's etatSment for your review. Fria various departments and and and from Other infc�rrriat ion s�upp�. s.ec� y � _ ed 1 n the��urtf� Gurtill I� you- � information. available to our staff, a,. report tnh and a decision will be rendered on the propoba in ' ' to cotmnent on this application, we need yiur comments by r a g.....„20, 1991. You may provided a separate letter to return your comet t® o If vog dire un : t® res>raari �y�the eve date please ,phiotae the Staff contact d Below Or attach n �s aeon as Anse the , space roaride , ® in �►xitf noted below with your nts and confirm your Ccxa�ent n g f you have any ®e estioae regarding this batter, contact the Tigard Planning Dep , " grard, OR 97222. MOM �►osim�iib�,e I y aa��ent, PO 8 ®x ��5�3? � 13125 SW M611 191vd C 639- +4171. STAFF CON`'$AC : ...,j2:91,L, : Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING 'ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal eitnd have no cb ectioi ti to itm Pleasae c3ntact o°,.ce. nk of a: TO: I. F om: Tigard Planning Department Subdivision approval to divide an a prox atel 3-00 acre .site into 14 Iota ranging between a aroxi atel n 7,,p00 and ZONE, 4 (Residential, 4. S units/acre). The R -4 zoning allows single - family detached remidential units, ' public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homemd family day care„ bonm occupations, temporary use, residential fuel tanks, and accessory structures among other uses. Z OO T1ON a West of SW 81st Avenue, south of SW Viola Street, and 14885 SW 81st Avenue WOE 281 1280, tax lots 800 and 8031) APPLXCBLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community OeveloPment Code Sections 18 88 and 12.169 I ., 1991 REQUES I� FOR CO NTS RECEIVED PLANNING r i e-ci%)(S\Ail 341: December 10 1991 715-E.C7-11 1991 Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review., From information supplied by departments and g various dep agencies ant! from other information available to, Maur staff, a. report and redOnMdtndatiOn will be prepared and a decis .on will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to coniaent on this application, we need your comments by De3. 20, 1991. You May use the apace provided below Or ttaec as S pa deg l�1tte to rem n your c + ontact t r _o. wn ��.._. noted below with your cOaa eants and confirm your Comm nt 8 in writing asst SOonn its possible. If you have any queas�t� on4,� rea ardin this matter, l: ,er, contact the Tigard planning 00.partment, PO.8cx 23397, 13125 St: ill S vd. , ¶! igard, C697223. 1410 NR: 639-4171. TAP Stake COB ""'ACt°. �e��.,. 4O i e r PLR CHECK FOLLi)W1 1� .._ NO ITEMS THAT APOLVt LAN... we hav® reviewed the proposal and have no ob ections to it c Please contact at our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. XX Written Ctomaine nts .11 1.. • .. 0 Ill. the devela er red eivres a 'royal for water main size. and fire .h' Brant x idatians throu" h the bis trict office. See of Person CalOent3ng: 1€iceL L.11 111r . �°, *rin Tech. 'III �. 5 5 Phone Number" 3 : 4 ----= bkm/SUU91 -17 'jF REQUEST. FOR cOrciTS • TO: December p - �.. DATE: .1 ©' 1991 FROM= Tigard Planning Hepartment s SUBDIVIS ON . sUB 91. -001 NEZMEYRP EH)W g (NPO 15) A request for Subdivision .approval to divide an approximately 3.00 acre site into 14 lots ranging betan approximate' y 7,500 and 0:600 square feet each. ZONE: R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre). The R-4.5 zoning allows cadential unite, public Gust facilities, reaidentia treatrient hcmos d�st�acr:�.. re in , manufactUred home's €'a�i.iy day care, single-family ructure Amon Bother uses. LOCATION* West of SW Slat Avenue,acouth�.o ho s, and occupations, tempr�ra�y use, residential fuel/ ' taxn�c et '� south of SW Viola Street, and 14885 SW 8 1st Avenue (WCTM" 281 1280, tax lots 800 and 801) APPLICABLA REVIEW CRITERIA: ComMunity Development Code Seetioz e 18.88 and 18.161 Attached id the Site Plan and applicant' a Statement for your review. Ptioin information a "vailable to by staff, a report and recondation will be prepared om ethe sn£orn►mtionx supplied b vasie�us departments and as ®racier andl £� p po by re. If yen. Wish to coati:int On this application,. wr and a dec3 ®�.o�a �ii�. be rendered on the aYea sail in the near u use the space provided below or attach a�sepa a etter to r urn yo r c nta P P rest 19��. 1��JU 131c�w .. y 'p � ,., the staff cOnttet, noted below with � ourrcca entevand ddinnfi y Y £ ou as �rrn . a e 'please- � in writing stn soon ae r:rn cur cinentas._ t e 1.. a� ssiblee. you any qu eg i 8 contact h T ga If o�n haste a�rn ®st3.orn ®r anrdin. this aaanttear, Planninng Department, PO Sox 23397, 13126 SW Hall 1111$*# Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639- •4171. STAFF CONTACT: 7e �£ier ,, tray PLaEtsSE CHOCK THE FOLLOWINS ITEMS THAT APPLY: We Wore reviewed the ro P pose l and have no objections to it. e .... P7-�� contact of our off ice. Please refer to the enclosed letter► Written Comments: Name of Person Comme nting: Phone NU ber n iiuslaus91. -17, SIB weeWoomktowesoraw 4 REQUEST Wort COMMIT DATE t Dior 14D 1991. " ,,fit :..,,M..W10.0* ..._ ;.M.. .. FROM Tigard Planning Department SU8DXVISION ' $if .. ;X:�i R8, (NPO i5) A regi est for otd3viei approval to divide an approximately 3 .00 acre site into' 14 lots ranging between �x �eat ®1y 7, 500 and 8, 6 8o square feet each. ZONE R-4. fj (Residential unite/acre The R-445 zoning allows single-family detached residential public support facilities, residential. treatment homes, fanning, manufactured homed, , am 1y day care, home occupations, t emporary use , residential fuel tanks, and accessory etrUctur'ee among other awes. LOCATION: W'v, ®t.. of SW 81st Aveztage, south of SW Viola Street, and x.4885 SW 81s Avenue (W 281 128C, tax 'Cote 800 and sal Sections �r L1�Z� �V1E(rt� C�'�I 18.88 and 18.160 T1SR3k�� Coi�aaun$.t Development Attached is the Site Plan and pl iicsa nt ° e statement n y o ' r r eview. . F rom information supplied by various departments and alenc e� .and Other inform at ion avail abl e to our staff, a report and recommendation will be p re p ared .. and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the, near. future. If you Wish to comment can this a lie, ►tion, we need your comments by 1111c. 20e 1991. IOU way use the space provided below or attach a eeparttom letter to iAturn your COMMente. n ate . pheae &Ana the eteff contact r*�...�� th e your caxs�►�e�bts ib3 e�.`tiaaq ae sown as noted below With your & y questions teg dirtg' this . tter"", cd;;rati, act the tgaXd posreible. If ��►u havei �:y' Orm rd, OR 97223. Pare: P .aflnin Department, P0 80X 23397, 13125 g �►d. -� T 8�1 Nall Hl' 639-4171. STAFF ' CONTACT: Jer �f f er PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THat APPLY .. objections t it,. p ro We have revrLe�aed th® sal and �xave no o Pleads contact ` - . of autrr off dea Please refer to the enclosed letter' Written Com.►ieitte '8aiae of Partition Con*nentU:ing: Phone Number: o E ina /SU 391 -1'/' 8 ` buildings awe ,to �ae .�ceaaQ�t�sd, ,;�' i1d�impaat�:on erutit' will '„be, 'i� any of the tank ,�, �� Oat and re aired. The septic tank Sall existing buil n�.. e � � p�ntp�e , tom lete:l remove.- ,An inspection shall be, obtained after the , tank p, o� th�'� r+c -�c� r � � � t pai1i`y' .�l��u,l �. tae copy ,o.2' ' ; �.�t from tie pp�n�, ,�o�a se�riri�d P ccrffnecl'w6. to the p+lio •''sewer d the �brc��►�.c��d� ; �� %e �u�,1d�.ab� is �+ � by-the , city. e tshall be ►t'berly c kpped"of1 ,, aiad np reefed by. y ,o i r vate a'to ..drain service line and 'ease l�Lnt i�G7��f. be provided for It hould be p aved' prior to ,x.s uttn'e of building o The pr3.�ate street' Should p s or monetarY performance assurance sh ttLlt'� be „provided. . The An a l a Should be inspecrsd by the ergirtaering :installation ��, the d��.va s, division. P. REQUEST FOR try, RECEIVED PLANNING SEC i; 3 199 TO: a..� ? .i / : 1 -� . , ( DATER De c r 10 199 Eotsa Tigard Planning Department a SUBDIVISION SUB U 1 -0o I '9 R ED6 Aitm S (I0O 05) request for Subdivision approval to divide an approximately 3.00 ,ire site into 14 lots ranging between approximately 7,500' and 80600 square feet each, ZONE: A.-4.5 (Residential , 4.5 units/are ) . The wag,. 5 zoning allows single-family detached ;. s�_ l m� , fa o3liti e es residential treatm at homes, farming, manufactured homes; day care, home occupations, toora� use, residential fuel tanks, and accesaorY structures among other Use LOCATION: West of SW 81st B s sauth of SW Wiala b :y�et, and 14 ®8r . � 81st Avenue WoT� 21 ADO q tax 800 and APPLCAMiLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community ��ve�ejre��t Code �� fans 18.88 and lg.160 info ation +C lied by various depag ments and �nage:Wie � s� and :review . fr©n other i .. �, will be prepared , ' .o asi. in the near future. If you Wish retndr�r. �lYadlo�i! de�itv�on ��.� available to 1.1,,:3r• staff, e,L �"�+ ea on 1��aee � an seoAn��n t � ass o comment On th ftt application, need yeur oommenta bSt .Y 22 91. Yeu may 1 use t space ewewa.fe.e.uwYd r __ " se letter td retur, your c ats. you are c rnto titabove d date peaae phons the staff contact noted b lovs with your con eats and confirm your C i c eats in 'iting as soon as c poL' ible. If yOlm have any gtestiona regardi g th a matter, contact th; 'Tigard an g t,, Hox 233970 13x,25 '! t Hall Dlvd., T .i �►s'.sd, OR 97223. 'N0Ng: Plar��iirn De� artz� �a,si�, 3'0 C39-4171. STAFF CONTACT: __offer .�...._...t�,. .t..., ee...Y,...+ PLEASE CHEdii. -4s VW:1011EW ITEms THAT APPLV, + . ... l Conn to it. ��.�� have reviewed the pr�spontal and have no "ob e�et Meade contact of our office. Please refer to th3 ' h3 enclosed letter, Written Comments ;4 -.- *wow. 1�egw.iY��fwr��+�fwr '�i�l Y•iw.�*�Y ?�I�+� +i .t�f��1�1,�u�s�w4fYI.�%�a4� .ism ..: ". .. v.ei. ad lr:6ywi _ .. iG'' ,..:,.�:.:jiitwi4weww+iiiA+iw. � pweeemu.iirm+v.wiii J.a.v4erae.W ,ii..i.l r.. +wa.rw , ice$ w: i:sr��. _ _ . . -__ .rerwl i isa r.rir peeovr is rkL w Name of Person commenting: ..�wpeetee�eev�wsl,',Y Pi ■n l hCSHae? der: A.. b /SUB91 -l7. sa �: A >. INA ICA R'E EsT 1N1R C0' YTS DATE,; De'ce gar 3Ql__19S° i TO: FROM: Tigard ' '7:L„ ning Department SU Divt a.9N S'�E 91 -�01 INE A� 0 (NPO *5) r�aen. f ®�; RE: Sul �,ei ,, approximately acre site into ��.4 :� �� approval �® divide an4 Sots . g n asap roximat 44y 7, 500 and 8,600 st uare feet eaolz. lots ranging between app The It �. �.� zoning allows 5 ` (Reeidentia]., 4.5 units/acre). .. ��r,fig 4a public sue fadili�. i00, ngle f��aily detached ree�.dent�.a�l eanit ®, ° � � c�aa��e, sidenti tl treatment hag, fa�.huiflg, .anuf,�:ctured hO, �� am .11 da he }me accu atio'ne temporal' urle ts residential fuel tanks, and a ssery j ,ist ruotur$ e among ¢the� v ®eew . L�hT IC): W� uer ssut of SW Viola Street, and 14885 SW 81st Avonue (, ��1 1�BC, tax l 800 a� 801) � xs� va�w r ERIA: Cammunity DevA10 n e ine 18.9 8 a 6 'RECEIVED PLAN G SEC 13, 991 l .cant ° e etatei�ert for your r+aview Pros s�ti�$ch+l°�C$ T, �J th�3 >5�.te �'1t�lY ` and° app ��n� iee a�,d '�rC;�i ®they° ee�pp�.i ®�i day rt asxs� reaoni'da ?s� �.c�r� iw�.�.l be pi�a,�ared inf ormat ion �rar ious department® and iui�9r�nat��.on avai.�.a►bal�a is snu;r staff, a repo �,n the ne.`�er futnxe. 1. ycu a�tsh ndered on the p,,;opo al I£ ana � dec�.��.on ��.� � �e re, � � �e� e� a.9� xs� �taay o ccrrent on this 'applicatian, we need your 0cn enta b r tur wear ccuuta use the apace pa"ovlde� hralor or attach a .- .�pti-�at�� letter to v© ate vn t nd b the as , ..a p 'ease phone tae staff contaCt n d.,beI -- , ire y�at�r c.+anen+ta ikY ti�ritisg a ecion as ed bek ®u► avith ysau►se ej,�ente and conf s�Mible. �eetionS regarding thin Matter;, contact the 'Tigard `� - D� If y�►tit, have �r� �; � �.�� 22� PR�l�� Planning � .p �'* g7 �trt.mietnb, � N mod, s�� 3!7 � 1515 Sly] ��.a A�.�d. , T .� 639 - 417.x. r T. STAFF CONTAC ,pxgt .Af f r . „ _..„ S . PLEA8E CH C=C T FOLLOWING ITE 4S THAT APPLY s Wan have reviewed the proposal. and he e a c ` no objections tt, It Ploase contact of Aeax 0f f icy. Please refer to the enclosed letter`. Comments xxxX if Y e of Pens», cd eaat3,nig: .S CC7 A 1 R _ Phonitt % ?,L 2441 bk ' /3UB91 -' 11 B °Ir ,;;. tiSr. 14: M r. • Cif FILE NO: SUB 91 --0017 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE TITLE NEINEYER I EDWI RDA APPLICANT $ John NeimaYer io Roger Edwards 4500 SW Kruse Way One #180 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: SAME REOOE3T ZQNEw„,__ LOCATION: Applicant requests Subdivision approval to divide an approximately 3.00 acre site i"to fourteen (14 ) lots . 600 square feet each. approximately and � ranging between a .�c�a� aureate 1 7, 5 0 Q a► ZONE: R..,4.5 ( Residential, 4.5 units per acre). LOCATION: West of SW 51st Avenue and South of SW Viola Street (WCTM 251 1230, tax lot 900) and 14885 SU 81st Avenue (WC .M 281 1230, tax lot 801'; COMPFSfEN5I � PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential NPO EO NPO CHAIRPERSON: Craig Hopkins P*IONE SEA: 639 -5823 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION ra PLANNING COMMISSION �I °+EI aaGS OFFICER. CI'T'Y COUNCIL emairmoryorros ANT � Uil .... DI WE OF;MARINO: TIME 2:2 DATE OP HEARING: 161.31.92 TIME :ag DATE OF HEARING: TINE : 7 O AND ATTACHMENTS: A � "UES�' FOR COMMENTS ARR14s''IVE MONVONOMIONMN X _ SITE P X LANDSCAPING PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN OTHER LNG PLAN PREPARE ADVERTISEMENT PLANNER APPROVAL a _IL. MENT - TI `A.RD TIMES _.:�..e,.� ORECONIAN .._: C NOTICE TO PROPER'T'Y OWNERS TO BE M ' � . ., - T E71'TER OF ACCEPTANCE OP APPLICATION a, NO` 'SCR i7!'C ALCM -- ATTACI NTS t ,,............,........7---,........................ _ STAFF CONTACT: .Terms Offer CODE t ITATSON $ 1 '.88, 18.160 USE LISTINGS: ..: L s ._ T. IN Gr Single family detaened � .rresad erttia.a l u i ts d public suPPort facilities, residential treatment gent � o a k farming, manufactured home' family careit home nccu Pat w n , to P ora,7 u a res idential lue1 tank and acw eks sy str ctu»e. ► ' no w0 CITY OF TIGARD, OKEcot1 =Daum APPLICA.TIM CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 1. INFORMATION GENERIC INFO On the west side of S V 81S t PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION •11111••• TAX r lAP AND TAX !LOT NO S XTE SIZE PROPERTY OWNER /DEED. HOLDERw ' 4 ElvAe r c 2 en. ADDRESS 02.. ►y rzy ., 4 PHONE CITY . tc z t2 » APPLICANT* Jo hn Ne1 e eJ Ro erEd .....� -. ADDRESS 4500 SW Kruse Wa ... .... CITY Lake Qswega, OR ZIP _u5. *When the owner . and the applicant are different People, the applicant most be the purchaser of record or a lessee in pons aaion with written authorization Prom the owner or an agent of the ones with written The owner( s) must sign thte authorization. pace prorided on page two or � 4 dubmitaaiwritten.~ authorization with this app1icotift. , PROPOSAL SUZY The owners of record of the subject property requeiu permission to divide a 3.00 Acre.,,, Totraiiren) Parcel into 14 lots between (number of lots) 1,500 SF and 5,600 SF eq :are feet J i size.' 0$20P/13P n YSt -. • .� • FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO.� OTHER CASE NO' s t ,.;.....r.. RECEIPT NO. qc��c: APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: __/j2=::1L:111/...— Appli atiot elements submitted: (A) Application fore (1) B) Owner's signature /written authorization (C) Title b tansf er instrument (1) (D) AsSesaor' s map ( 1) E' Pre1i.vinarY Plat (pre -apP checklist) Applicant's statement rpte` -app checklist) (G) ... ecrpert me d add , "41") N) Filing fee 0415 p1w t5 per lot) liar ?RATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: N.P.O. Number: Pie .i: �fttairy Plat: Appro tat is : e F inal Approval Date: Planning Eugineer.s!g.y Recordi,1g late an P• inter 1, • List any variance, Planned De°elopment, Sensitive Lands; or other land use actions actions td be considered as p atr of this � plca� oa a No ne 4. Applicants: To have a complette npplicatiOn ,yov4 will need to submit attachments described in the attached info7cmatiou Sheet at the time you stibmit this application. • THE APPLIC.Ake (S) SHALL CERTIfl THAT s A. e :above re tweet does not W,? y , eed 'res&ictiona that stay be ac:aohed.; t© or irpoeli!.� the, : °tt t °o, rte. B.' If the applic tiou is granted v � a app lies nt vial exe�cis e tbr: rights _ g ranted in accodance with the tens and sin (c to .all the conditions and limitations of the' approvaA Al]. of the above statements and the statements in the plot, plan, attachments!) and twitted, her..t±fith, are true; and the +.. nd exhibits tr�ax�� permi this applicants each, statements a�, PP is so acknowledge that any P �•- Issued, hase�, 0�4 t 'i' it is found that any s are application, may be x�v+��Ced� �� false. applicant licant has read the entire contents of the application, including a the poii ies and criteria, and understands tha requirements for approving or denying the 'application. DATED this 44. day of t, . �: 19. / GNAT1J ES b of each owner (eg . husband and wife) of the abject property. • t°,1. 01. tt December "MATTHEW 141‘ ALPHA ENGINEERING INC. ENGINEERING A DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A SURVEYING PARK" APPLICANTS STATEMENT SITE: TeX Map 2S/ 12BC Tax Lots 800 and 801 Area m Approximately 3.0 aores ZOgING: R-4.5 (75010 SF min. size lots) PROPOSAL: Proposal is to divide the Property into from 7,500 SF to 8,650 SF. Two lots ( 7 corner of the site would gain access Via DENSITY CALCULAT:4.0N: Gross site area 3.0 acres x 43,560 (based on actual survey) Less Strocta (including private streets) Net Site Area Divided by i,00 SF SOLAR ACCESS: 14 lots ranging in size and 8) in the northwest a Private street. 130,680 SF = 21;575 SF 109,105 SF 14.5 units Lots 1 - 12 comply with the basic requirement, that is, having at least 90 feet of north-south lot dimension and a front lot-line oriented within 30 degrees of a true east-west line. Thig equals 86%. CEDtu TREES AxC SW. 81st AVENUE: pplicant Proposes to elocatd tot of the Cedar trees that eY ist .4100q. the sa.ts S.. 81st Avenue frontage. I has been sug geste that the sidewalk to be constructed along S.. 81st A*0.040., could be moed west in order to sae the trees it ap pea.ks ciear that street consUrncta.on (i..e. grading, curbs & paving) will. require tree renioval efore, the apUcant pz°.ittoPoOd.P...tio' sidewalk arid to:ot:hotH.toot*,4i of the ite. PLAZA WEST A SUITE 230 A 9600 54W4 OAK PORTLANID OREGON 9/223 A 01-45 2 - 8003 „AL 503. . • • The develGpment plan includes au twt treet that stub the west property line. Ths HO) ha been aligned tich provide for an additioa1 fiv et of id3yard setbr.ck or Lc 5, La Maha Estates • This lot will. become a corner lot cnce ti A private street is propose to sve lt 7 and 8. This prvate Etreet will be ideziticl in terinv of die.001.00P*A.,04i to the one recently developed in Aahford : Oaks No. 3 Santry sewer and storm drainsige will he extended into the e from exiting ElytiteM13 in S.W. 81st Avenue. Thel:fts existing eys terds have be.: n sized to accommodate this and future cleveltrost4ent within he bas ,t. , - r • D in 7 1. NOV 13 91 ii : 21 BOCK E & GATES closing date eJian be on or before the 150th day after the effective date of this Agreement; provided, however in no event shall cl osing occur prior to Janes 3, 1992. Escrow fees, a osl. case and transfer takes shah be shared 3 � ' � y equally by the parries. SE= shall pay for the cost of the premium for ttie title insurance to be provided hereuteder. 4. s The closing of die tansaction will be conditioned upon I •� R s obtaining a feasibility report ( "Condition I'') and i' M epprovel ("Conditi on II" ) for a' preliminary plat to subdivide the perty into residential lots, each to t. 3R shall . i� nod filth �verita l approvals for the contemplated development Of the Proper ._ Ulio81 rearionable notice, Ewa and/or its agents shall have the right to enter the Property to ondtct normal. feasibility stwl ? acdvitles, SELLER, shall have no responsiWlity. Le obtaining, or be liable, for the costs of or expensce rebated �' d to said stady , prr..liminary plat apptreel or the acts of 'ER and/or ite agents upon the Property, and BUYE.R. sh l hold SELLER. harmless .. from any damage causer to the P opety and e. y floe e� Seller fr therefrom, and shall �d . may during t tna occur personal property thereon as the conduct of any shady or by buyer or uy ens agents. BUYER shall P - rovide SELLER with e p les of all documents d With governmental A$e��ias within ten (10) dap.' of each such . Not later then forty five (45) daya .after the a 'eedve date of the t nt, EI R shat file its.` N application for approval pp (to s+ubcvidc the, rprcapertiy) to the appropriate govenureentel egeneleep i3I>R eat to rescind this „ may el �einea�t tit any tie within ninety �9I�� days from the effective date of this Agreement if buyer does not otherwise waive. Condition I or? CeAtdiaon � effects of section 2 shall s till be binding upon BMA, and SELLER) which event the �. BUYER shy P rovide to SELLER such eviideir a of resc,i: lion as S81 ,111t troy reasonably re4 ure. In the event no 'such election to rescind is made .. �. � elAthin said ninety (Op) day:. period, the foregoing condition shall be deemed waived and I31T lltt shall deposit into . sum of live Thousand I�o1la� 5,400), aia +� .asli, es a�l�li�o� ;all escrow the additional eat„ est pney. Sad additional earnest money shall be credited against the purchase price if the traisaaction closes Said earnest Money .. shall bo. fodeited gz3it if the VACANT I b PU .CAE • sj ,41 Non. N9V 13 '91 i1: ?1 BOGLE & GATES PtiS. transacdon fad to close for any reason miter than $ELLER's breach of this Agreement or the failure of BUS to obtain approvals, from all appropriate gffertraelltill agencies to subdivide the Property before the coa e p � elm set forth in section above. in the event BUYER falls to timely close title transaction, this Agreement shy be null void and of no der' effect, provided, however, that the earnest money shall be fo'cfaitcd, 'paid, and 'released to SEL 5 S1.1 fr f Y G. a Condit%► I and II set fort in section, 4 above. are { 13U YER cl Buyer may Waive any and all of such cor�dit o for the sole benefit of �� 31iy so lets YY��Y - ��i��• Title to the Property shell be 6. �onv� ��c � �.YY� conveyed by SLUR to 1314.11tEli. at closing by statutory warranty deed; subject to easements, corndUtions and restrict oil of record, zoning ordinances, building J and use restrictions and free. , slf local inaprovemi.ant district assessments ode prior to the effective date of this Agreement. yi . eee reel As soon as possible after closing, SI L L1 R shell furnish, BAR with arl owner's policy of title fragrance ' Insurinsi BtMR against loss or damage sustained b y reason of the te�ketabd i of title or enc1� bra�ce� ier o. n, . . other than the exceptions described in section 6 . above and the usual printed exceptlorts contained sus glides , 'Roth property taxes for the' Trent tax year shy be prorated as`,. of closing; if the Property is sa biect to any agActlitatai. or ti ter talk deferrer, any deferred taxes shall be paid current by S LL R as of the date of closing, 9. p P ,�!�Q `1 h .. There is no personal property included tt,r fib purchase price. 3 VA,CANT LAND P 1RC$ . SF AND Skil ItOREMENT o‘cL1 i kouttot , a� vo P' ua7',. ✓ ni .I f IY a breach of eenientii S , void Old of no Wier e N WITNESS WHEREOF the day of Novvnibe 1991. r R's wain .aid ,r Iea76- of pant e have emoted into this • VAWI " LAND POkC E A SASE AGREE A, I r !outh nne.half of L at' 47 and the. north-12 aett co ROAM ACRES, in the west quarter of Secaton 12, wnshhp 2 South, Rio le 1 West *Malt ctte Medal* f Tigard, We 4ington Count, ' Oregon more particularly dies ad. follows: etowng at . the Scut" west cagier of the North, 12 feat of said Let 46, thence along t 1 i '"Jae Of said ;Lots 4 and 47,, Nt 01 03' 143.70 feset to NorthW � ��" East, �4 the er of said South tilt; -ha of , ot. 47i thence ; North 8 SQL; " ;East, 324.85 feet alga Northate y Of 'ma South o to " East n of thence c . �, 'West gong-, tom` a of said o 4/ aid 43. 9 feet to tue Southeast cr►. vi the 1.414rth 12 feet f said Lot 46; ,.,tilienee Sob 89 g3' 2Q" West,: 327.01 feet to the Int: of beginning. o- 4 sha11 be credited against the purchase price if the, tra sac iof closes. Said earnest money; paid, shall be forfeited to transaction fa SELLER if t�� fails to close for any reason other than SELLER e S b reach of this agreement Closin L The closing of this transaction shall be escrow established by SELLER at First American Title Insurance Company, in Lake c swelo, Oregon. The closing date shall be on or before the 210th day after the effective date Q this agree lent. Escrow fees, closing cost and transfer taxes shall be shared equally by the parties. SELLER Shall pay for the cost of the premium for the title insurance to be provided hereunder in an Co i o Li.. c. 'd.. -AM` oti . The closing of this transaction will be conditioned upon BUYEReS obtaining; feasibility rep p approval for a preliminary plat to subdivide the property into residential lots, each h acceptable to to BUYER. BYxYER and /or its agents shall have the right to enter the property to conduct normal feasibility study activities. �L S ��L.� �ER shall have no responsibility ` for obtaining, er bE liasble,- acts of for cost of said study preliminary plat approval or the BUYER and /or its agents upon the •property, and BL'YE shall hold • SELLER harmless therefrom,. BUYER may effect to rescind this agreement at any tim e within thin agreement on either effects of ectian 2 shall 9 0 days froiu the of festive date of .ic said still be b:ncling grounds in which even the upon Bt YER 4nd P SELLER. BUYER shall Provide to SELLER such evidence 0 PAGE 2 +- VACANT LAND PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT the event no , resG°�l:is'�o1'[ ' as SELLER may reasonably require. s ,i��'i. such el Action to rescind is made within said, 90 day period, 'the foregoing conditions shall be deemed waived and BUYER shall deposit into escrow the additional sum of $5,004.00, in cash, as additional eaSC�st money. Said additional aonal earnest money shall be credited, against the purchase price if the transaction /loses Oaid eat est mone.� shall ,be forfeited `� "'; � elted to SELLER if the transaction n fails to close for any reason other than SELLER'S breach of this agreement or the failure of BUYER to obtain approvals from all appropriate governmental agencies to subdivide the property before the closing date set forth in section 3 above. In the `tent BUYER fails to timuly close this transaction this agreement shall be null, void provided, however, tha t any r 1d earnest moeY , of no if further effect; any, forfeited to SELLER is paid and release, to SELLER. 5 WAIVER _ OF CONTINGENCIES. The contingencies 5e W forth in section 4 above are for the solos benefit of thl BUYER aid h m v waive any and all of Such contingencies he so elects 6 "CAN YEYANCE AND CONDITION . OP TITLE. Title to the property s � � be conveyed by SELLER ER ... to BUY ER at closing by statutory aarranty deed; subject to easements, conditions and •restrictions of record, zoning ordinances, building and use restrictions and free of J.o. 1 imps: ovement district assessments made prior to the effective date of this agreement, TITLE . INSURANCE. As soon as possible after Z losi g, SELLER shal`. Curnish BUYER . with an n4r a s policy of PACE 3 �' - CAN'T' tAND PURCSL AND 8ALE .ACaREEMEN'3': x, a . ' yj[tl,i dl� ..0g0Yo J1M�p it a losing, pa MO n,��Ew easo bie�� Bib 6MrWor ey s �1 'actu® `a ' toy pggp�, .may Iry .4 t d 1 e Ikj i G oup 0 � e ll,S Ito s train r� . ��, O 0 a X71 • .15. 4. �eaverton�: O e ''on 91O ..0.1 ,�q00t.. „ by an `eat estate agent` o� b► • deal estate cOmmi4sio s 16 Wiz',., t y; M SELF« , s ut'nis �u� ,. bo0rid42 ' a *penes d ` o ?URC SE hi.n 60. days of hh ' 17 e : ZARDOU WAS ,O sELL : ' "ants ha the prop arty .s not now cafe , ;e pith arty h zarclaus ha her such the agree 0n . Bet a as of the .5th •day c SEY L PACE 5 - VACANT LANG IUUtC} sE AND sAt AdREE4ENT Dom. , t r. APPLICANT: Phone: ri ZONING DESIGNATION: v ®5 orMoVner `. D �' a A` ION 4 CHAIRPERSON: a1 ( •r PHONE ZONING HENTa Minimum lot size: � . ft. Minimum lot width: Al ft• ft. a s ear- =4m S®t% k c�%a : front- , e ft. s.., 3_d a r..__.. garage- ft. corner-'J5.. ft. from both streets. Maximum site coverage: Minna landsoaPea or natural vegetation area. ae A Maximm building ile.$r.gh'h,; ft. ADDITIONPRL LOT DIMENSIONAL U NTS Minimum lot frontages 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition pG o.e®&A. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of .frontage or h av e t: minimum 15 foot wide access easement. J, sy C qq `: o of 2.5 to 1. Maximum �.Cd'�, d rth to width ratio spgiaINL SgTSACKS .........- tit. from centerline of "Boitt.r....1knleitheel-"areteM ft from -�.._: g the site's i -._..,r boundary x its 10 ft. side yard Setback e$ ft Salo Acce a to 5261q. ft in size =5 ft. setback fry Side Acce>$�md �,t�.�cturee� tap to rear lot lines and structures: up to 1000 sq. ft. (::'.ere a owesa ` �w 0e applicable zoning district Zero lot line lots: minimum 10 foot separation etween baildi Rge Multi gamily residential building separation: See C ode sec ion 10.96.00 i6.O30 Ega......0151103a6WERrainammwominidim eau.. rip SPECIAL BUILDING Maximum height of 1 -1/2 stor'.es or 25 ft., whi +,ever la less Q� s.., I � PROVISIONS Flag ��•M�O �� most zones; 2-1/2 stories 35 ft. in R -7, ,12, R025 or st 0 zones if standards of Code tion 18.98.030( are met. options (Code Section 18.98.' ... ) : Buildings lo ted in may be built to a height .: , 75 feet provide 1. imtun PAR (building fl r area to site ' . ea rat • of 1.5 to 1 will exist' 2. All act building setbacks wil the buil din r height; and . The structure ...:1 not abut a resider.,, . .1 one district. Building Height` a non -re idential. at least 1/2' RES1i2 ENTIAL 2NSITY CALCOLATION specifies that the net Community Development Code Chapter 18. pe C residential units allowed on a particular its may be calculated by dividing this net area of the developable area by the minimum number of square feet recce b1eez following i rict. irk per dwelling unit in the a• lica feet by subtracting land Nat development area is calculated h area (s) from the gross site area: 1. All sensitive lands areas - land within n the 100 year floodplain ,. slopes exceeding 25% - drainageways 2. Land dedicated for park purpose,e 3. 'ublic right -of -way dedication 4. All land provided for private streets (includes accessaays through parking areas) The Cit y of Tigard allows a residestia] density transfer of up to 25% of the units that could otherwise have been developed on sensitive lands areas listed in (1) above to the developable portion of the site in accordance with Code Section 18.92.030. It is the responsibility of the applicant for residential idential developMent provide a detailed calculation. for permitted residential application to pr density and density transfer. RESIDENTIAL D SS REQUIREMENTS partitions are sub sat Effective May 1, 1901 all subdivisions and Minor ct »o 1= solar access requirements which state that 80S of all lots developed must y •, solar-oriented lot are high be solar -oriented. The characteristics of a etcr levels of wintertime sun striking the south walls sofa of the house, house orientation maximising south window area, and south- sloping roof aea. o a To achieve this, one may utilize the following: 1. Basic requirement: Design a lot with at least 90 feet of north - -South lot dimension and an orientation within 30 degrees of south; Protected Solar Building. Line: The solar tg ,nianus Of 7 Eabe 2. pro•�e building line rs�ast a) b� oriented within 30 degrees of south, b) have a i between it and the middle of the lot to the mouth, c) have a minimum of 45 feet between it and the northernmost buildable boundary Of the 1 ` which the building ine is located: ` option the house to be . Performance options: .. .. - ,� ..+� �Aa at 1eaet first o ican re �.r� oriented within 30 degrees of an � at west axis' an a 9 within assind 80% of the ro�±aad floor ac�utY1 wall protected frost shade. The s., Page 2 ,Nat. option r= quires at least 32% of the glass and 500 square feet of the roof area to face south and be protected from shade. Total, or partial exemption of a site from the s :lar access regu,Lrememt can be for the following reasons: 1. East, west or north slopes steeper than 20 %. 2. Off-site shade sources (structures, vegetation, topography) 3. On -site shade sources (vegetation) Adjustments allowing reduction of the ; O% solar lot deeign requirement can be for the following reasons: s 1. Reduced density or an increased cost of at least five percent due to east, west or north elope greater than 10 %, .- eimificant natural feature, -- ex . tang road or lotting pattern, .- public easement or right-of-way'. 2. Reduction in important development amenities. 3. Pre - existing shade (vegetation) . Maps and text r riff .dent to sheer the development complies with the solar design standard, except for lows for which an Sian or adju tment is required, including all of the following items: : 1. The north- south lot dimension and front lot line orient tuna of each proposed lot. lines sit Protected solar building relevant building restrictions, if - pplica bees 3. For the purpose of identifying teeea exempt from Section ', a map existing trees at l . 30 feet tall —and and over 6 inches diameter grade, eluding their height .car at a point 4 feet a S"y diameter and species, and stating that they are to be retained and are exempt. 4. Copies of aim. ':vote resiictionsa relating to solar access, . requested, maps and text aufficlent to If an exemption or adjustment . is �"e'+� with the standards elbow that gig lots or ease in the development comply i' er such an exemption or adjustment shall be sUbmitted. lg. DENSITY Y T'P SX"]C'X ®la less of the allowed housing density i a zoning district, any wits; n i00 feet of designated eotabl led area shall net be t a density greater than 125 per At of the maacimum lawn designation (not zoning) of the ad ent parcel. type of u use this t; ing for req airs d parking: ated ccepact -only Z 18 ft. 15 ft. 25% of rec ,uiat Spaces may be de = . Standard parking Q;ce dimensions: 9 Compact parking space "u enaion5 a 8.5 ft. aced. Handicapped parking All Icing areas Prey Pro e ' ng in excess f ive required automobile parking space hall provide app 3at y locate and designated handicapped p arkin g apace the minimum nualiser of hand3rapp Page 3 parking and Parking space site are mandated by the Oregon Revised spaces �a� be Provided a�.n �aa (see lout). A h - r capped parking space symbol shall be painted on t parking space . rfaCe and an approp ate sign shall be provided. Bicycle racks are pia aired for civ n'ea, not- resideA, al uses, commercial , uses, industrial use providing l5 or n• ..e automobile Bicycle :; ratio of one parking spec �,s • l� cle et be provided at parking � bicycle rack •ace per 15 auto king spaces. Bic .. a racks shall be located in sac protected from automobile traffic, e Planing Division can provi. specifications f approved bicycle 1 k types. king a eaa and dr sways must be paved ZULkfltja Minimum number of .ccea &ea Minimum access dths rianimula acnes ». lidth o Pedestrian �.. cce�d must be prov . �`ed between building entr u : , a end. parking . areae,v o door common areas, and public sidewalks and . a Bete. For •, F .: ailed i.nformati q:' on design requirements fo parking areas and pm Code Chapters t 0G and 18.108. ace �•� se ®,. see Comm�atait: Development l- ». maintained n and and eight VISION ARM. retiree that clear vision be _mrtatazned �ooa.,traeen three road/road e road /railroad, feet above grade at The size of the required r intersections in specified clear vision areas. ycanct, . vo�.swa � clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional claassifcation,,,•°° ,, le,holeck r LANDSCAPING s are required ' , ` ` , fronting _. a. public or r to street rest trees �►ar a �ilr3.vewa� o more than 100 f . � iax .,r® Street trees p p g lei rust placed either within the public righ .. of-way or on private p have a min- tua, cal.i r of two iwrich t -o� wad bound . ry street ..� of the right-of-way _.. e® e ■ ,::. Street property �:�:,hin silt meet OC tare should .. spaced 20 to 4 feet apart depending on are tree size Further informat s;a on regulations affeotina street trees o a list of recommended gtree'i GS may be obtained frem the Planning Ali.. . d,1.o1Cto ALminimum of one tree �� von parking spaces Mu planted � end parking in order pr ovide a canopy effect. Tan de e ` , ai• ed d acre� n of parking areas from v 4 from Public rights of way moat prov►id • RUPPIEffnmg;k0 SCREAM= In order o inoxea>je leirivaalf, and to reduce or eliminate verge na a or visual impacts s be 'Adiacez'tt detoll ntE, espeoia be .twe . different land uses, the 0 y, requires landacared buffer a as along certain -.'ite pGr'iraets rs3 a iced buffer =sae are deacri b by.the.e,0de in terms ; of . , Mixture of deciduous width. suf a: sae must be occupied , erargreen roes and shrubs. site obsscu .g 00reene, or fences Are wa ago require in 6°11° caloea, and often advisable even 'if re 07, ed o Re e3 buffet areas s aa 3 only occupied Vsgeati f endear t ties, amt,,d sidewalks. Additional information on r ired buffets cretin materials d sizes may be the ' Planning Ii ion bul ,eta' on found in code �baea .. ' m 1A�► and landscaping and b** Ue tha applicable to your propo 1 area: ft. along east bound ft. along west bot, ark^ /n s. Ltion, sight obscuring screen is tegnired along SIGNS Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in th City of, Tigar,d. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request,. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may twa. if, the sign al is rt.v`ewed as of a de eft .:.l ,cat on. 6 s sIT s An_ Administrative Public hearing Public hearing Public hearing staff revs w . before the land use hearings officer. before the Tannin g ConiEsion before the Plaaning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. Another public hearing £ce h&4 by the City Council. All applications must be accepted ' by ' a Planning D4vision staff mbar at the Community Development Department counter at Clt y gall- Appl, ie ationa submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday wi,11 be batched for processing with the following w e9s;'s application) for processing. No applications will be accepted after 3:00 P.24. on Fridays or 4:30 on other, days. Naps submitted with an application shall be folded in advance to 6 should by 11 inches. One fit.5 inch b 1�1 inch map of a T project �` map submitted 2o�,: attachment to the staff report or administrative decision The ,Planninc± Division and Engineering Division will do a preliminary review of �ita Inn application da. s of submittal . Staff will tify an applcant i> e r additional ittefermation or copies of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative decision /public hearing typically will occnnr . approni mately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning ravision. Applications involving difficult issues or requiring` revievi by other' jurisdictions may take addi~ Tonal time to review. Written, decisions are issued within 10 days of the hearing. A 10 da y appeal periodfollow all decisions. An appeal on this matter, would CLi be heard by the ,. A basic flow diagram illustrating the review process is available from the manning Division. The ✓..pre - Application conference mild applicant notes of of the''•hennfe Community e intended to inform the prospective pp primary . y Development cwie requirements applicable to development Of a particular site and to allow the staff and prospective applicant to discuss the confferencefand constrainte development of the rements and Site. of conference � aspects of good site planning that should apply to o e development of your sate plan. Failure of the staff to provide any i required ed by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicabie standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Counity Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an app4,4 14ationp Anothi.r pre -a licat.!>,.an conference is required if an,application i s to be u. ess the second conference is deemed unnecessary confen:enin unless the pre-application °3t' by the Plainnaing submitted more than Sig months after this re a 1 Division, Page 6 'h , :' 4 {7g ,�° A � s • f2� � _ '. fir. • �wi� W l ..r t L PUBLIC � rITI$�' The purpose of the pre -app conference is to: ( i) identify agapplicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (ii) to provide City staff an opportunity to comneent on specific concerns; applicant (iii) to view the application review process with the app g ' erito decision maker for the including 3�dentif '$ems ®nt of be �pac improvements l � an°aet dedications to be application. The approved required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and app by the appropriate authority. There wil .p be no final recommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies City staff rt�n i t to review and comment on the and the pu��,�ic have had.. an � ,�- y' application. The followin g comments are a projection of public required as a condition of improvement related rec irementa that may be requ development approval for your project. ][aicxh -ofzya dedication: The Cit y ° of Tigard requires that land area be �3 dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights -of -way to the ultimate ,unctioea� errs cla�s if icatioa rights-of - way width specified by the community Development Approval of a development application for this site will require dedication of right -of -way for 1 0'6 ,,., e' to A5w feet fx:om centerline 2. ' t , . t® -feet Geeervismterriner Street i1 arovements t 1. street imprevements will be necessary along ittleatei±jfkge 2. �_ s•treet improvements will b' t necessary 3 , i Needed street mprov'emefta will include feet of pavement from centerline, curb and gutters, storm newer e , a five -foot wide necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two yew' sidewalk, r�r�co ,� .,,, :�: °��' �' C4ra�b �� i�i'io'�r°' S. etreetlighting fee. ". public + •tical the atre�4. is�,p ro ��tc may be In same cases where street improvements or other improve nts are not currently p deferred. n these cases, as condition of devo opment approval the execute a non-remonstrance act eement which waives property ogre = � e) must e g the property o :.. right to remonstte against the nation of a local improvement distri formed to improve 2. Pedeetrianwaya`bikewaya es sanitary aewe to •this® pre arty is an ae, �anitar�r.�re ° The closes ii inch line located at ,. ; The proposed '� -ay The " f ��`' r p anita sewer. t is he devetlopet development mix -��, be connected to a s., .... ,�,d development ®3.t•- ° e responsibility to extend the sewer along the propos p ► 6,►, �' ' i Storm sewer iii rovetiaemte : Water supply; The Water District (ph ►neg 11.15!P4) provides public wate,t aer,ioe in the area of the site. The District ehould be contacted for information regarding water Supply fOr your Proposed development. Fire Proteotio nj Tualatin Va Li ey Fire and Rescue District (Contacts Gene Dirchill, 645 -5533) provides fire pratectii n services -0 Lthin the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted fpr inforeation regarding the adequacy of circulation syetLs, the need or fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: TRAFFIC IMPACT FAMS Ixn Augu =.t ` 1990e the Washington County Board of Commissioners adopted the county -wide Traffic Impact '2 eat (TIP) ' Ordinance and referred th measure 0 to the Washington County voters. In September, 1990, the Washington County electorate ' overwhelmingly approved expanding the TIP program througld�out all jurisdiction within the county. This action placed into effect an increased street development fee on all new development in Washington County The City of Tigard has adopted the county • s program. The City Traffic Impact F e program Will collect fees from new development based on the development's projected impact on the transportation system. Developing properties will be required to pay based on the number of trips they are projected to generate. The TIDE' is calculated based on type of use, size of project, and a general nee based fee category. The TX ' shall be calculated at time of building permit . . i issuance. _. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIP' may be allowed to be daferred until issuance of oCcuPancY Permit. Deferral of payment until y is permissible only when the TIP is greater than $5,000.00. sT01114WATER QUALITY FEES The Unified d Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90 -43 Surface Water Management Regulations, requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their construction The resolution requires that a fee and/or construction of a water quality facility be built. The fee is based on the amount of impervious surface; for every 2040 square feet or portion thereof, the fee shall be $37.00. The City of Tigard determines if h fet or facility shall be built. STS OPENING .. P: �'� No work within a public right-of-way shall commence until the applicant has obt3iTed a street opening permit from the Engineerinc Deparm e t e FINI FLOOR ELBVaTLONa On all projects that require a grading plan the applicant shall submit with the grading plan a typical floor plan for each lot, which shalt have the elevations of four corners that plan along with el.- 'vations at the corner of each lot. M0: »BEAPP MSb PREPARED HI: t ENGINEERIFIG DiV1S:ioN PHONE: 63.461/1 Page m OF ,TIGARD COMi•ith 3ITY DEVELOPtiF.NT DEPARTMENT t PPLI :A ION CHECKLIST The items , ' the successful coNgpletion of ' •on �h� checklist here requirements. r,�he�ci�'ist ident:�f.ies what is your application submission q Th %�>� sheet MUST be brought required to be submitted with your application. .. and submitted with all' other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further exp3 :',nation of these items or call Planning at 639 --4171 $T,.MS TO BE BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 authorization Owner's signature/written C) Title transfer instrument t D) Assessor's map E E) Plot or site plan E 5) Applicant's statement (C) List of property owners & addresses within 250 feet :A (14 riling fee ($_. � `' SP .0 IFXG MATERIALS 0 Igtv Acz,latieio, ' Woe, lic.s lee le.1.- Site Inform tion sh in (No. of oopx is C ] 1) Vicinity Map ( ) 2) Site size & dimensions 1 ] 3 Contour lines (2 , ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades ) 10%) [ ] 4) Drainage Patterns, courses, and ponds 1 5) Locations of natora1 hazard areas including: a) 5'loodplain areas i ] b) Shapes in etcess of 25% C 3 d) Areas _w� ' c). Unstable ground � with high season � ... �l ] atl. water to�tent�, 1 3 e) �`lreas with severe. soil erosion p 1 3 f) • Areas erel weak ,foundation soils 3 6) (Location ofhresour�ce� areas ' as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats ( ] h) Wetland Other site features: 3 a) Rock outcroppings b) Trees wit h 6 ° + gal i p er measur ed 4 fee t from _ w;: ourisd _ level C 3 8) Location o ,existing structures arhd their uses ' C 9) Location and type of on an off-site [ ] s and easements ( 3 ,d off �xte nraxse sources &0) Location of erta.stac�c� uti�.xcxe 11) Location of existing dedicated right -- air -Ways 1 ] ' of copies ) ► r Site Deuel,oi men Plan showg�29 (o, 1) Tha proposed sate and surrounding properties 2) Contour line internals L 1, 3) The location, di pensions and na` les o ant a) g �, Public way'r streets adjoining a Esistan� & yl:att� ets & other � - ' d stye and ea�e°�.e��:g on the site an 1 J g properties APPLICATION CHECt LIST a� Pay e l «.a 41, b)) ' ro osed streets or other public . -ays ` & easements on the site. c).: Alternati Ve routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site b) ,'irking and circulation areas c) Lading and services areas d) Pet.estrian and bicycle circulation e) Outtoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities 5) The location, dimensions & setback d- stances of a1? « a) t`xasti permanent structures, Improvements, utilities And easements which are located on ti-e site and on adjacent proporty within 25 feet of thy? site C b) Proposed 'structures, amproa mentsP utilities and easements on the site t 1 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions I ) 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be landscaped C e) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering., crime. preeentior techniques 10 The ' l.odatidn of mai lbox 1, i i) The location of . all' structures and-their orientation 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements Oradinq Plan (Noe of copies efreee) a The site development plan shall ,include a grading plan alt � shall same scale .as the site analysis drawings and sha contain the following nd extent to grading will 1) ;The e. location a � take place indicatng general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed t be done. 2 A state n,froma registered en g anger supported by dat,, factual substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report b) The validity' of s` nitary sewer and storm • proposals service prop dra�.nage c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated b h�t ectural �ra the nlis dP (No: of copies : C The site develo p ment P lan proposal shall include: ] 1) Por plans indicating the square footage ae tg of all structures proposed for use o... 2) . Typical eleVation drawings of each structure. 3 Landscape Plan (No. of copies ): C. 3 The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analy s i s plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1) Description of t irrigation system where, applicable C 3 LL a .., 2) Location a nd height of `fences, buffers and screenings I, APPLICATION C4EC6 LIST -w Page w 3) A ., ` ;ion of e! rs Aces, decks shelte play areas caoaaMon open spaces, C ] 4) Location, type,, size and species of existing and pro o ed plant materials. 1 I Th., landeeape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Sell' conditions. C 7 2) Erosion control measures that will be used E ) SicLa� ®rawings Sign ai evings shall be submitted in aczord ance with Chapter 18.114 of to Code ae part of: Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Oulding Permit to construct the sign. 0) Traffic eneration estimate N) P l irna nar�r P"a oe lot i.rse ad j,ust sen .nap showtre (No. of Copies _�..... _ 1) The owner of the subject parcel 2) The owner''. s authorized agent 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet=1), inch north arrow and date 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries 5) Location, width and rimes of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ] 5; Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of ' all property lines 7) Location and width of all water courses C ) ), Location of any trees with 6" or greater car iper at 4 feet above ground level [ 3 9) Location ofd existing C , existing-utilities and utility easements 11) For major land p rt,tion which creates a public street: a) The proposed right—of—way locastion' and width C ] b) A staled cross- section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip 12). Any applicable deed restrictions C ) 13) Eidence that land partiti on will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ( ] I) Subdivision Preli.airnoar.— 6+l.at Nea;nd „data sd1oawl (No. of Copies )• 1) Scale equaling 30, 50,100 or 200 feet to the inch. and limited to one phase per sheet r 2) The proposed name of the subdivision 3) Vicinity map Showing ropert s relationship to arterial and collector streets C . 4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, survayer, designer, as applicabl'' 1 5) Date of application C 6) Boundary lines of trrcit to be subdivided 7) Names of '' ad j acent subdivision or names of r'^corded . �wr�er's of adjoining p arceIs*of urasubdi.VidOd 8) Contour lines related to a CityM- estabilli,she be0th- mark at 2 —foot intervals for 0-=10% grades greater than 10% 13 C3 C 1 ] Ii APPLICATION CWECttLIST - Page 3 Nth 9) Th�a urpose, location ty;p,� and size; ?a`," all of the following (within and adjacent to the �,a•oposed subdivision): C. a) Public and private right-of-wolis and easements [ b) Public and private sanitary and **Loan sewer 'Aines E c) Domestic water mains includilg fire Hydrants C d) Major power telephone transmission 1inas (50,000 volts or greater) C ) e) Watercourses C f) Deed reservations for parks, open space; pathways and other land encumbrances I ) 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe. sizes indicated C '' 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants. 1+`" 12) Approximate centerline profiles showinli the finished grade of ;xl streets including .street "t vtensi v5 for a reasonable distance beyond' the limits of •t1Je proposed subdivision. sections of . proposed street right-of-way: ( 13) Scaled cross se 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ( 3 15) Location, width and 'direction of flow of all water- COL ses and drainage ways C 16) The proposed lot configurations, approx imate lot proposed dimensions and lot numbers. 'Where lasts are ,to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots , trees with a. diameter 6 inches or 17) gr�ea-tertm asured�att4ef el,: and * � proposed above ground ,tee the =location of pr'op d tree. plantings, if any EL; 18) The existing uses of the property, includ4Lng the location of all structures and presen,' uses of structures, and a statement the structures th�`e statement �s are to remain after platting 19) Supplemental in. including: information a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) b) Proof of property ownership 1 ) c) r � . ion c A proposed plan for provision of vubdivis improvements 1 3 20)' Existing natural features including rcik out cropp cgs, wetlands and marsh areas. 13 CC `.® 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot ; practicably be sewn on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorpdra ed into a narrative and submitted with th application. 3) Other.Informatiof ca (2362P/oo20P) APPLICATIO 1 COECRLIST -- Page • CITE DUPANTLIBNITS 1o/!/ Building Inspector/Brad R O .;. ty Recorder ltd as P emits and t Or la G. SPICISTRICTIt Fire District ( .tok upe box bldg.) surd Vat r District 6777 StV Burr& ma St. Tigard, 01 91'223 ! ° ater. District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use a Tramp. 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis Kevin Mart in Joann Rice Scott King Fred Eberle Borreson Li hobl Dist. No. !1-9 avr ) Ow Eta »o Box 200 Aeaverton, OR 97075 sclhooi Di trict 2547 (T ) 13t37 Pacific Hwy. Tigard„ OR 9722 Bend A _ City of Beaverto ,a PO Box 47955 Beaverton° OR 37076 DLCD (CM' ' ' only) 1175 Court 6t. NE Salem, OR _ 97310,0590' State Bijhway Division Lem ` Ounc person PO Box ti65 Beavert on, 01 97075 m a ... �w •. a .. w a. a m a s. '. o a.. m e. a "4.4." ee 5,. SPNCIAL EN%IES General Telephone Mike Leta 12660 SW MAin St. 7frt�u OR 97007 WO P at' nr 1 Gael Don Thoma t 220 1* Second Ave. Portland, OR 97209 ,�. T0! Cablevision 3500 SW Bond l `Ivrtland, 0141 97201 Brian Moor0 14655 owOid Salons Berry Itt0h0 OR 97001 )Metre Arei 0010.1114aati.Sittlif Harlan Cook Twin Oaks Technoio dente 101t itit 169th Vidd4 0 'iletiVitottotair OR 97C06488 6 'S Went Fetes XelSon 421 SW Oak St. Portland, ort 97204 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] NOV-26-91 TIDE 15 54 OaL. P'H -1A P F31 at t brand A•• rN•„+WMI•.A•.V M•..r...,.M W .+xLNw I..∎••01yA Fax Transmittal Memo 7672 FNo.oiPagcs 5dotPAW Tans Company . .,, .U.,r....M...,r,...»v.,w . .....�..w....,.. ��M.• ...M..,. w�...M.. �W. �M,,.•...».....,• .,.Y.NN. «.•IiO"g1M�«,. .,..�. ..�..�,,.,,•.,y.. w . .... . er ---, LT—. — . � X Y M MA..Yr} ^ ...N.YY . ..... + W i f.l. ►rw+V.• 6.41%..4 *M:::°"any 4SidaiNNUOt Location Location Dept Charge .. t/M( r Z971, �wre�wtn w Fair � 'Fart o Con• manl y� e `watt" Reim DCanforpickup aW VY�n.I...,b'+rwl .vlw 24.84 7 �.r.... -- 8,450 SF 8 So SF . '10 500 S' tct t:ats'dm4 p�a6t1 Ia 4l ;f a9:F LI P a.u,lua;a 1 tk to 4Lo.p. a mtvirl0Jdla;u1 ;aaaclrpaa, -qt a> pa.tn: t� $� xagw taq aq Lois, a1a Fa X0-41.1.011, n.a; Ious — xa ;t1 -aina;laz (s13 wa =I,sX ra ; }anso-pu; 21t osfiaa:: fr +.l.z1 ;'1a. pr.a41L IQ 4413 941 ET psaldaaa ua- ;Ta{ — ,aa:a5 d-al. dFtu 8: oi_ J iaicfrla.. 11 i. a 0 a D: a. % 1 s CITY OF TIOAE Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF PINAL ORDER BY HEARINGS OFFICER 1. Concerning Case Number(s): SUB 91- 0017 2. Name of Oeiner Jtshn N ®i ie nr Name of Appl ic'ant: 1109.E.14.3.105120.. 3. Address; 4500 SW Kruse 'Way One # 180 City Take C9 ®gemo State OR Zip 97 4. Addres o of Property: Wes t sf_m_ust Aveyggl.south of SW Viola Street and 141,85 SW _ 81st Avenue Tax Nap and Lot Ito (s) . : 2S1 ; 12BC . tax dots , 800 801 Request: a• roximatelr 3u00iacre ®siteointol ,divide 14 ar ng between proxi. a,tel 7 : 500 and 8 :6 00 s„ are feet eaph,. -. ZONE: R7 4.5,,_(, psidential 4.5 units acre :. The R-4.5 zon;Ai:nc all2ws giggle -family WWIE M aw e© dentfi►a. r att .24.0,io Aue r fae !lities residential ,,tleeatcIMt ,Yams a ia0ina. mgnufactured host_ L� an care,_ home occux�ationa , timtorary t1ae esidential fuel _ tanks and accessor atructre® PiIY,Vn iii. l� Ya uge® o Aei':ions Approval as requested • _ Approval with conditions Denial was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hallo' . Notice: No tic and mailed to: The applicant and owner(a) X Owners of record within the required distance The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision . THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON UNLSS AN APPEAL IS FILED. obtained from the Planning Department, Tie and Cit Ha conditions 5 can the statement o The adopted i�i�adings of fact, decision, and g �, all, 13125 SW be Nall r P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. accordance With 18 32.290(8) andnSection 18.32 370aWhichoprovides t in Anb an Y'� party , ,f D may , days . � at accord. appeal may � that within l0 days after notice is given and a written a cal ma be filed sent- The a by may be submitted on a it forms and p must be accompanied by the appeal fee $315.00 and transcri t costs v sar ` . i es up to a ma uimum of $500.00)- The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3 :30 p.m. 10. est,ions: If you have any qi estions, please cell, the city of Tigard Planning Department 639 -4171. bkm/M11991 - 17 , ° kd AFFIDAVIT Of MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard �Is � 1- \,°.1i h depose and say: (Please print) That S am a cg ,.� 1 G o for The City of Tigard, Oregon. I/ That I That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission t✓'�ga�d Hearings Officer __-- Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named attached list marked exhibit "3" on the said notion NOTICE OF DECISION as her to bulletin beard on the _____ day fir in the United Stated Mail on the postage prepaid Prepared Notice, t�1i N ' ti � . , , 4 4 4 0 " 4 and sworn /affirm t o Me on the j 1 0.10 a Decision) of which is attached (Marked p►` sons at he adds se shown on the day of attached, was posted on an appropriate' , l �A and deposited day of ARY PUBL "' OF ORE c''ti N My Comiiideion E;1cpa.r NoTARV PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Fxpirea g lawirminimmunignimusimasur • N C P U B L I C .,. H EAR X NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, January ].a ?. AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: SUB 91 -0017 FILE TITLE: Neimeyer /EdwarUB APPLICANT: John Neimeyer c/o Roger Edwards 4500 Std Kruse Way One #180 Lake Oswego, OE 97035 REQUEST: SUBDIV3SY0N SUB 91 -0017 NEINEiDR /ED WARDS (EP0 #5) request for Subdivision approval to divide an approximately 2.94 acre site into 14 lots ranging between approximately 7,500 and 8,600 Square fee each. - SANE: R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units /acre) . The R , facilities, residential zoning allows Single-. f ;wily detached residential unite, public support treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day care, home occupations, temporary use, residential fuel tanks, and accessory structures among other u0e0. LOCATION: 14885 SW 81st Avenue (tnlC:TM 2S1 1280, t x lots 800 and, 801) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.50, 18.88, 18.92, /8.96, 18 98, 18.108, 18.150, 18 • 160 and 18.164 omprehneive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. . 'THIS . ( Se �R UaILL B� ®C r�se Sd+a F ONDUCTED IN CC PE WITH THE RULES O THE HAPTER 18 2 Off' THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND R ROCEDU1 E ADOPTED MATTER By THE TIGARD CITY COLtNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HAM, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANYONE WISHING 'TO PRESEKT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPS E MAY ACTION SPEY DO SO IN R TO %!NE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIO PRESENTED AT THE PUB IC HE I GVJt I THE PUBLIC HEALING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECIEVE A .... TEL ..T �.. • , P N OFFICER N %��° �''C► RING, AND TIME PUBLIC HEARING. � THE 1�ARYNGS CONTINUE THE STAFF REPORT �RES�NTA ION FROM T .._ HL CITY k�IsANIi�?DR, OPEN THE PUBLIC INVITE BOTH ORIiL AND `�114I�TEN TESTIMONY. �: N.. CLOSE THE P�JB�� AND TAJCE A `' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, w ' G HEARING TO AN07�HE.. MEETING TO OBTAIN PUBLIC HEARING CT�q.ON ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN THE APPLICATION AFTER December 21L_1211, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONi'TINTJA►sNCZ OF THiy HEARING. _ IF REQUEST CONTINUANCE RECORD GRANTMAIED HEARING, ANY PARTICIPAN' HEARIG MAY FOR AT LEAST SEVEN L ;AY6 ;; BRING INCLUDED IN THIS NGT,C APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST CE I LOPMENT APPROVAL AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. FROM THE TIGARD �'% OV'�Al OF THE b L' � BA6°$�L,[JPON T AND THESE ;. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPO APPROVAL OR DISAPPR HE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE THESE CRITERIA AND 7�HES1� CRITERIA ONLY. RTANT THAT NPO NO: 5 OWNERa Zame COMMENTS RELATING TO THE AEQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RATAN AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE MARINO ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFI:IENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE aj. MAiC»R. AN OPPORTUNITY 5� r, 1�Ei$]p(DNk$ TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES b�>�C,� ;CON P APPEAL 'TO THE LAM USE ' BOARD OF APPEALS RASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE— NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE LOP ION .AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN RNPORT WILL �tPAAVAILABLE ET FOR SEVEN D A COPY OF T STAFF YNCS SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE �iRAR c OBTAINED FOR . TEN N CENTS PER PAGE. INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CM BE ®STI�I FOR FURTHER INFO - AITAFF PLANNER .Ter, y':...Offaer AT 639— INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE ._ � �R NEIGHBOR/mop 4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL .RL' . • OR CONTACT yam PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) # 5 .e.. CHAIRPERSON. PHONE NUMBER: G39 5823 bkaa /SUB91 17.8F5M musull ur ul 1110, sal t► Ave ANARIN 1 lina agg I CO r- 83 O rCT . Tiririlara a 141 �.. W MI= LA M N CT. mum 411"1116:1‘,\N'...\\\N,1 1MM 00801 ROSS .. _ III 70 ■ IN D'' 40 11EM MINN IENIS uii Doti 111111 VI :.. 6 1.1 4NE MP,,r;. 511 ra a.l 111 AN I ay. "111 maill ro 2S11280-04000 • u• e e 0... is • s ZILLION; ' ) $ . 14840 SW 83RD YIGARD OR 97223 2511200 -0490 Sc(nT L BROW i RO13I 'A 14860 SW' . 83RD TIG RD OR 97223 JOHN NEINEYER c/o ROGER EDWARDS 4500. SW KRUSE WAY #18 LAKE OSWEGO Oft 970$5 RANDY CLARNO' ALPHA ENGINEERING, INC 9600 SW OAK PORTLAND OR 37223 CRAIG HOPKINS 1430 SVil` VAR ?S ST TIMM OR 97223 LARRY EPST1 I 722 SW SEOND AVE PORTLAND OR 97204 2S112BC-P5000 r,:•O•!O• o•�dW•Rle••; M/Vo BANG" 1.4880 , SW 83R0 TIGARD P* ' 97224 2S112$C -05200 ••• io revs • id ••fore• SSNYDER; a3iai:'"rrrD B r,. CILIA .s 14920 Sid 33RD:' T/GARD OR 97 {'24 2S112130-05400 ••a ••e a••w••3•¢••e.e. GAIINARtii ZANNETH L 8340 SW LA MANCHA CT TIGARD OR °`7224 2S1128C -06706 •�a O.•4WO•r O• F'ORSTY , WA ,TER A ago VIOLA, 8315 SW LA ?imam CT TIGARD C`R 97224 2S1.i2B0 -0510, • a • • a a • r XIOJAEL T SUSS il.41143 14900 Sid 031tb AM TIGARD OR 97223 00 •. • 'o • • • • 2S132BC- 0530 0 , . Gi1'1 IE . 14UnDIETHE A 0320 SW TEL MIN► COURT TIGAI1D OR 97223 2s1128C- 06500,�ui•a••••a`N•r•`n•••.••• ROBERSGN a GLENN A & HELEN E 8335 SW LA MANCHA or . TIGARD OR 97223 2S112CB•y0O700 ilord w••••ae•es� STEVEN I• & DEBBIE E. MANGOS 13275 SW' ROSS ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD 2S112y 00l`�� . • w d,. w • e. GB ��/ +`�W ♦ a d w; o r n d�• a e SCHtfIDT, JOB$ E AND JANE V 8325 SIR ROSS TIGARD OR 97223 2S112CB -12300 wos•o•o<is••••••■■•••• 2E112CE- 12500, 2S112C8-12700 *000000..0000 word 2S112cB -12400 w• ews o ec r•.sdwo• 2SU1CD -12 6D0 s c•s n••.e•es ae•s♦ FRANK & CHARLOTTE ANZALONE 15038 SW 81ST AVE TIGARD OR 97224 2S112�+C -00400 ••......••e •• ••4.. • MACK UNON, DANIEL W HABLE 1475( SW 81ST TXGA.lD OR 07223 RA1E, J NES h RAZE, GARY T RAZE, BRUCE G 16725 NE PACIFIC PORTLAND q OR 972.3 2S112BC• -00700 .0..0..0 . o ,h w w. o o o . . GOULD, LYDIA KOPF AND HARVEY L 14980 SW 81sT AVE TIGARD OR 97224 RAZE, 4AMES A RAZE, GAEY g. FAZE, BRUCE G 16725 NE PACIF :C PORTLAND, OR 97230 2S112BC -03900 •44444•646444444•444 O ° EEEFE, EDWMAD 0 AND RTTASA:AE P 14760 SW 83RD TIGARD OR 97224 n y� ry 2S11280:. —00600 .......... •oos•e•o•4 • NEELz, ED E VEIdITA 14940 SW 81ST AVE TIGARD OR 97223 S112RG —Q4100 me•.?•. •oIs•.oisea4ws SOULE0 JOHN A AND DAGMAR 14020 SW 83RD AVd' TIGARD OR 97224 2S112NC- 00900 .. • os.o••Y i.oa« B?• BZW, CBARLES a VIRCfl IA L M825 sW 81ST TIGARD OR 97223 2S112BC -03808 O• O iO Y• d 4.44 O.O • I MAEOSTICA, MARGARET 14140 SW 83AD AVENUE TIGARD OR 97221 2S312BC— )4000 ..........4.. 444i444 F!,'JN0Z, AICAiligto, MA.L+1ZCn %EStIR Iri 3:4780 sw 830D AVE TIGARD OR 97223 28112BC -04206 oa b'.rb kiII;1 Pit,' UP.0 x AIdF) DIAWg D 8530 SW Mugrooc. sT VidAA0 OA 0122':) •.K Y i• • 2S112BCb4 800 .poi• 6•in *ee..osiob KILLION, THOMAS J C ANti TERSA L 1S112EC- 04900 .... WELL, SCOTT L AND B iOWN, ROSIN A ._ • 8200 a3W ROSS : ST •.` TIGARD OR 97224 261.12C11,-00700 00 • • • . • 4 . • • • • • STEVEN R.G DEBBIE L. MANGOLD 8275 SW ROSS ST ', fIGAP D OR 97224 2811208 -12300 6......ei••n!oo••• °. 2811208 -12500 me.eeme a• e•ee ••ee• 2S112CB'42 tl 00 • •; m • • 4..0...6.. . ..• • . • 2S112BC -00500 • •e•.•.•o •••Yo•..•o M32, JAMES A RAZE,' GARY RAZE, BRUCE G 16725 NE PACIFIC PORTLAND OR 97230 2S112BC -00700 ................. GOULD, LYDIA KOPF AND HARVEY L 144980 SW 81ST AVE TIGARD OR 97224 GAYLE A 8210 SW' ROSS XG ARD OR i 223. 2811200 00,900 ..44.4,....,...4.•,6144e may y SCRlID , �Il , CEN E AND OM tl 032S sSk ROSS TICAAD OR 97223 2811208 12400 •.•i0.••. .... ..•.• 28112CB —'12600 • .• .•.•.••e•••.•••- 2S1 2SC -00400 e•ee i_..•a••e•ee••••••0... I4A4RINNON, DANIEL W' mains 141550 SW 81ST TIGARD OR 97223 2811280.- 006019 .•w •n•1:e.•. NEELY, EDWARD ii VBN XTA 14940 SW 81ST AVE TX ARD OR 972234 .g �y /� ru •••• 2811280- 00900 ..•ea.4.•..s••••..a.• SABIN, CHARLES J VIRGINIA L 14825 SW 81ST TIGARD OR 97223 28112BC- 4)1000 .e.......o...e.•••••• 0AZ p WAMES A RAZE GARY E RAZE, BRUCE 16725 NZ PACIFIC PORTLAND OR 97230 X71'1 p— p� 281280 �y 03900 ^".'",..•0 ....... O' 1KEE FE, EDWARD O AND RITANA? E ' 14760 SW 83RD TIGARD OR 97224 28112804 04100 •..ee.eee.i.ae.eeh,S.e SOULE, JOHN A AND DAGMAR 14820 SW 83R13 AVE TIGARL) OR 97224 4°IJ.i6 sn:::4a 04800 0 11 e • • KtLLI0N, THOi m7 AN'p TERE'SA Ta ': '"4. ..__g A . •• xv .. 28112E043800 •*•e•eeeeeeeeeeoeeeS. MAROST .CA, MARGARET T 14740 SW 83RD AVENUE TIGARD on 97223 2S■1211C44000 ie•.esw..se eb•e,eoge k, !4UNOZ m $1011Akt,j HALIK, LESLIE M• 14780 SW 53RD AVE TIG OA 97223 2S11280-0420D oe•s..•s& X 1�io•geeoemoe 11Ag, MOO A AND D1. tE 8330 SW AUA O0K 8T TIGNW OR 97223 28112BC- 04900 6644","41""... 4 4 WELLS, SCOTT L AiQD BitO WR, MOFItM A GI' 23112130705000 " • a. • a • ••• • •,•. MA, NANG LEE 14880 , f,�.�1 83RD % Tip OR 91224' . 15/1213°. "°52OQ et *4.. a a a ae'e46s.9..a eai'Se'reat a R4' AR? * f D CECILIA 14920 SW 83RD TIGZ ► OR 97124 y►,, 1, j� w 2&l1 �u�.O5400 ..,..J••••.d••.•••••'• G n'Prr NNETR L 834e ;1m LA M,NCFIA;' CT 'T'IGA. OR 97224 2511211& 706700 • • e e e • o e e a de e e r� • • I e,: 4SORST! WALT)R A AND VIOLA 8315 SW' MA 1CHA et TIaA D or 97224 2Saaasq 51© ..... ,49Q0 SW 831w AyE TG . AOA 97223 '2811.. 13 05300 •Ya••b'••aee•e4 •••si•• 3tJ*HR. tEl a A:`' D' A 8320 . SW 'LA, ,SANCBA. eiCgiUT T/Giati . t,oR `; 97223 281128C- 06600 •.41••e •...a•:. +ae••••• ROBE ON. GLENN A & Lal,L3N E 8335 SW LA. laticatzt, Off" TIcritto 0 97223' 24112BC -04800 • a r .'it a e• •' a•• a e• e a• a a a KY LXOit, '�'1$f�l7xs� AND T'ERE1$A .4S46 S ,83RD TIGARD OR '91223 2S t12eg7o49oo • yq. lac" n i • a o • as • r t.; q e i a t6,, BROWN, ROBIN A 14800 SW 830 TIGARD OOiti' 97223 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: December 10 1991 FROM Tigard Planning Department R- � XRR�EI (WPO 5) efor lt r approval ty pp approximately 3.00 site into 1r ots an 9 in g between approximately 7,500 and 8, 5 00 square feet each ,ZIAE: R--4.5 (ReMidential, 4.5 unite /acre) a The R -4.5 zoning allows ing le- f anti ly detached residential unite, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day care, home occupations +, temporary use, residential fuel tanks, and accessory structures among other uses. LOCATION: West of SW 81st Avenue, south of LW Viola Street, and 14885 SW 81st Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1280, tax lots 800 and 801) APPLICABLTE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.88 and 18.160 Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information suppli d ` by various clepar'rtments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Dec. , 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If au , are unable to xessc►nb ,_the above date pease shone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your come'', in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this ter, contact the Tigard 9 Department, �s Blvd.* Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: Plannin e ar�mnt, P® Box 23397,. 13125 SW 639 - 4171.. STAFF CONTACT: itif fer„ :: PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT . APPLY We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to "r,. Please contact of our offices Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments Phone Numbers ..____ _�, 110TI9FICATi05 LIST_ FOR .ALL APPLICATIONS SPO 1i0. - vd pies CITY DEPARTMENTS ilding O flcis1 /Brads R. city Re irdor ,G'� ngineta':cing /Chris D. ��dJ�'etal Coordinator/Viola G. ��VV� rdina'Isc�tc/V'io�ia 0 SPECIAL DIS Fire W strict (Pick -up box) Tigard Water Die t nict 0777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 TualaZin Valley Water District - 65111 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, Bait 97223 • AFFECTED J►JRISDIC'a:S. s Wash. Co. Lands Use 6 Trecep. 150 N. Pinot kvo. Sillib oro, OR 971.24 Brent Curtis ---- Ravin Martin - Joann . Rio - Scott Kling Fred Eberle —°"- Mike Boarmeon City *, of Eeav`erton - Jun HrandrYm PO Bo* 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 City of Ring City """' City Manager 15300 SW 116th Ring City, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego "�'.. City Managiar 300 SW A Lae cordage), on 010Z4 State !Highway Diviiaion ..tea... Sob TMoran PO'Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225 -04/2 5. SPEC AGENCIES general Telephone Ruse Willa 12460 SW Rain, 6t.. Tigard, OR 07223 MW Natural etas Scott ik 1n8P 220 1147 0 ocagd Ave. Portiend, OA 9729 8. CC TCs C abledieion Of Oregon � „- Hike . 8allook _.. 3500 SW Bond St._ otbrtlaaaid, OB 97201 Coluadbia Cable (Frauak Stone) ""--- 14200 SSridd Brigadracn Ct Beaverton, on 97005 SmAT a AL3El CIAS Aeronautics t hiv. (OOCT) EM9 /4eer. 77"— Board of Health Fish S Wildlife Parke S hr eation DiV: su(divieiofl Su)ieriieaor 1`{`optc of Energy Ih pt. of Environ. Quality i EDERAL AGENCIES Corps: of Engineers - -..-.f Volt Office Eontha rn $aific, Trans rpetatiofl Ci njpany ' 08485 M. pathil , PLS - Panl�j Engineer . 0R. 324' US taticaa PartlSdd r OR 9729 t Parks S Recreation Board ---- Police n . —Field Operations t/v/ra gD1J0 FC °y�►. School Dist No. 48 '"'°" (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Pox 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 School Diet. 23J (Tigard) 131137 SW PAoific hwy. Tigard, 07 97223 Boundary Commiission, ---- 320 SW Stark Roos 530 Portland, OR 97204 METRO - 2000 SW let ave. Portland, OR 97201 -5398 DLCD (CPA•a only) 1175 Court St. NE Salem, OR 97310-0590 Other err•+ -�-- City of Durham ▪ city Manager 17160 SW upper Booneo Parry Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland ....... Planning Director 1120 SW 5th Portland, OH 97204 ODOT L €a wie n Hamann 9002 SE McLoughlin Blvd. daiilwtaukie, OR 97222 Portland General Elec. - --. 14655 SW Olen Scholle Priem Moog* 3t'r'g. )eaverten, OR 97007 Metro Area Ca eufiCrtiano Janos Hewitt thiilaPaka Techat®lagy CantO r 1015 NW 169th Plaice 8 -S020 Re aaees on, OR 97006 -4886 US West Pate. ainan. 421 SW Oabi 8t. Portland; OR 97204 Division of State, Londe `°"'"' Coerce Deptu ` m.0. Park _..,r LCAo PUe - Fire Mmre a13 Other ... :. — [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]