The URL can be used to link to this page

SUB1991-00013POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. 11511 'iii e Rd. sc 139th PORi 9 28 , 2 4 200 2S1 4 . • , o •'lir e � I X17 �.Y�. � ��a•,ry, �'�;'� '�Y •k •uh).Aay ZL • ?'C l:t atM:t:r.c�sr SI 'RRA (PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT, INC. P.0 . Box 1754 LAKE OSWEGo, On 07035 (503) 684-3175 FAX (503) 684 -3176 May 16, 1996 Jim Hendrix City of Tigard 13125 SW. Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Hilishire Summit- Phase 1 Bonds Dear Mr. Hendrix Attached is a copy of the letter from Michael Anderson i spoke to you about as well a . a copy of the plat for lots 16 and 17. As I stated, Mr. Anderson spoke personally with the owners of lot -16 during their landscaping and the covering of the access road which our company had constructed. He chose not to take any enforcement action to prevent the homeowners from continuing their landscaping over the road. Subsequently, the lot -17 owners have also had dirt p laced on top of the ace ss road behind their home. I would like you to review this matter and I would like to have your support resolving this matter with these homeowners. Iawou7d like to approach the owners of these two lots approach as soon as possible, but want to be sure that the City and possibly the City Attorney will back us up when we insist that these roads have to be re-constructed. I am also not Sure what rights we have to enter onto their property to do any of this work if they refuse to coo'..ae appreciated. rate � Any input you can gxuc us would be a r¢ciated' our e: i el it is right for the City to hold Up ntire improvement bond in the amount of $531,635, because of this access road. I believe the City should allow this bond be reduced to the maintenance amount for this project plus allo'wances for the asphalt ov y any t.. :..e ous fo p .. erla plus an monumentat�.on and Miscellaneous. We feel we are being penalized 'by the City not reducing this bond because of actions by these homeowners wLich we have no control over. Please let me know if this bond can be reduced while we work to resolve this access road issue -with the :e homeown rs Thank you for your attention to this matter, S:Lncerely,..e, Nelston e 1,,i.1 1 1 11 f. '..,1�, 111A'° .' -: Itii 10 P.O. 'BOX 1754 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 (5 04,1.10, 5 it s Doaoex er 11,E 1995 Randy. Woolen ity Engineer ity of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OA 97223 _ nee it .efir access roads Dear Randy: ��F4 a� letter s to o� w with our phone conversation o� M1�� tlw NA�Br �'�,A 1eoM �`+tl°a�r��M'� -up 1�w1VM11Y �5�,8. �A ^aANi� 6d�6o08A V'Sardb��.AY,WR70u at Ftiday regarding Michael Anderson's letter to Sierra Pacific dated October 12, 1995. Michael's litter followed, a meeting on- site between Myself, Jeff Nelson, Michael and Aa Cityl S maintenance perV.onnel. The purpose of Michael's l ter is to summarize the options we discussed on- site, to provide access to the vari oue sewer Manholes whero topographical constraints make 4 tl p drive-UP access iMpoes ble tl aU , agreement .s r '` Michael's 4 A `;a 'fie a�� e � � �ean� �� letter and have been implementation wa��:�n for a break in edd our best ee � °fie 'o completion according to the plan ofthis is .. ebr dcr Y 10th. Thi Y is based historical weather patterns which typically give us a couple of cold dry week in a nuayy . W had expected to be able to begin the work is ootober, but as you know', our rains oaMe early this fall and have been setting records ever since. Paragraph . ® ,, a gix �n regards �� 5 of Michael � letter, � as s�,bs�.3tu�Ae locations where gravel pa h rays ate to be used aces PoUr of those locations are across the property of private parties, who have alr add' Moved into their homea. I Vi11 be contaOting them this week to begin the effort to.acquire the make Progress in hose regards we ��additional c�a��ae��L� d As we �;� will update your staff to keep them informed. Ours truly, A Y..t'W _'11 ,, TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Dick Bewerdorff Greg Berry' May 23, 1996 Request for Reduction of Performance Assurance for ;Wilsh re Summit As you requested, I have reviewed this request and found that a similar request was responded to in the attached December 8, 1996, letter from John Hagman to Mr, Nelson of Sierra Pacific Development, Inc. explaining the need for the maintenance nan,ce roads before the performance assurtince could be reduced, In his letter, Mr. Nelson mentions the dispute with owners that is causing d,ffculty in providing maintenance _ . .��Q �. ..,� City this an a roads. Bonding for the roads will have little value to the City until this dispute is resolved. Consequently, I would urge that there continue be no performance assurance q Y9 g reduction until these disputes are resolved. Also mentioned in Mr. Nelson's letter is the need for the City to intervene in this dispute. Since the City has not accepted any improvements, this is a private dispute between the former and current owners so City intervention would not be proper or authorized If you would like ire to pass this along to Mr. Nelson, please let me know. C1/4,,C1 ,)\.``tiY C - ,M( 0.41-104411,14 0k, i ' ,Ap k Cole \'`ire `CO 'hoc ys✓r(w�:0o\, , " r,.r: (�r �r`it, ✓ 51I~RF3 , PAC1P1C DeyELopMENT) 6Nc, JEFF NELSON P 0 0OX 1754 LAKE OsWEOOd OR 57035 (603) 684-8115 F=AX (608) 5844 -81 "6 ■OEIL5780,1188 T/ +w si;, Mr. Jeff Nelson Sierra Pacific Development, Inc. P.0: Box 1754 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 In reply to your request for infQrrnaton to clarify the status of the project, the following should do so: Field review disclosed that Elie "A.C. overlay, concrete sidewalks /aprons, street centerline monumentation and sewer access maintenance roads are not yet complete. How the aforesaid relates to City °conditional acceptance' is (described) as follows: , y � you proposed. One Side ialk/,Apion remains to be e The overlay can be 'bonded' as o o p' or, likewise, it may be bonded. Centerline installed; it � needs to be completed or � ,� monuinentation (box's) needs to be finished or, likewise, bondbde All maintenance roads must be completed; bonding is not acy,eptable. Further, as quoted in your letter, the project Maintenance Bond amount ($53,163.50) and the overlay Performance Bond amount ($28,525:00) is correct: Therefore ae the project is eligible to be placed onto it's Conditional Acceptance period, with subsequent release of the original performance assurance aftea action is taken to complete and/or bond the aforsaid described items: I hope this answers your questions: Sincerely, Sohn S Hagnian Engineering Technician 312b SW Hail Blvd. Nord OR 9722S (503) 659 -4171 TDI► c503 684"27Y IVIEMORA. y ITV OF TIG D, O GO rA Dick Eewersdo ' , Planning Division Brian Ra gr, Development, Review Engineer i haveloOkedfi.ittlier into thiS,,iosup and have been able to: t o), e ith'Pl ti' eery bout ,her previous disc ssions w t ' fe to l Anderson,. ,Attached :� is a. o that paw Wrote to 'IsiiIiehaeL dated 'October 4, 1995; iri res eonpe to his r gtlest'for guidance regarding the City's rights to require a nii to ariee access roadwa for the sower line hi the memo y ®u will find that Para was given copies of the fine order, tii�; subdivision compliance agree ieiit A the t)erforgiance bond and related cost estimates, d the CC &R's for the subdivision: flased on that information, she 4Ceterm ined that the City, in fact, does have a right to require the mainterance roadways. I am satisfied with the City Attorneys rung g in this case and feel that the roadways should be reestablished: Mr. Vakoc's Michael told him okay to roc � r,,,�sseri�on that. m �t was landscape the easement area not fit with what we have found in p our file and what the City Attorney has provided.' a PUG 19 96 ®3 ° 06Pt l c DONNELL', RPMIS ANTORNSYS AT LAW x i s ? N.W. H y Street PortiOnd, Da on 97+9 Oik 0503) =1402 October 4, 19 T Miami Andonon, City of ward En i . eel ta Department FROM: Ihunela I. .' ry, City Attorney's Office i Summit at Bull ' n access eutments A p9, owner S set �o vision :+ right to i'n a i contested City's w the property owner claims the City does not following of the subdivision aud a of the lot in question. The property ow= contends the City only needs the easement _.._ for utilities, therefor the sine of the easement should be beyond the City's ad ' tra. have provided s of the subdivision ' l order, the ion comp lime et, the Forformance bond and related cost estimates, d d fictions, 'dons and covenants app to the ivvsi n for our review. You also state the the ads easement ia question was dedicated to the City as part of .plat. Does the City have the authority to noire that the easement a improves, so as to permit vehicular scessr Und®r the fits described above, md given the additional fact that the 'improvement to the improvement cast %i the subdivision bond, the easement �'�.� a� of the paa ad future s ��, the rirm City has the autnsa ai r to u that t develops such that the mss is no longer needed, the City wsy vacate that on of the easement not asp for utilities. If yot have any Anther questions reg x ng this matter, pl call: rtmmii90024raluimm.u.s r Richard Bewersdorff 1 125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard' Or 97223 Derr Mir. Bewersdorfte This letter is being written in response to the dotter received from you datod July . .. y along at p rear of my lot. Mat � discretion, T� the owners des rot i 24th, r �rdon the utility easement Ion the �'� t owners r� a utility easement can be I�n�,�r�� and fenced at is exactly what i pier i to do. I will grant access to the easement whenever it is nrlacessary fdr the city to service the sewer line and manholes. If you hao,e any questions, tioh�, ai�� feel free to contact me. Regards, i.� 4i Bob White Home 524-1181 Work 978-8255 Doug and Jane Vale' r 13975 SW High Tor Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Vakoe: you may 20-foot utility easement aong. the entire rear of your lot. As ou ma know there is .a �.o f Please be advised that an access roadway of 10 feet must be maintained to service the sewer line and manholes. It has been brought to the City's attention that you may have covered the City's easeme nt with landscaping which impacts access and completion ss by the developer. Activity that obsteucts, covers or otherwise interferes with the completion of and use of the access roadway must cease and desist. Any materials placed over the access must be removed so that the develop. r can complete the subdivision improvement work The City requests that you immediately contact Jeff Nelson of Sierra Pacific Development, Inc., P.O. Box 1974, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 (phone; 503-684-3170 with a schedule to allow the development company to complete its work. We believe that if all parties cooperate, the issue can be resolved amicably. However, in the event that it is not accomplished, the City will seek whatever legal recourse it may have against the responsible parties. If you have questions, please feel free te cont act me. Sincerely, ay t y Richard Bewersdorff Planning Manager Jeff Nelson Are r Hendryx i . Bth n Lager 13125 SW Hall Blvd., 'Nord, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDb (503) 68,4-.2'772 'o'` raa.wr.;twe1A' .61MI010.n.+r0re..wa.wn.MwP4, rOCIM , Bob and Kathy White 13933 SW High Tor Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Dery Mr. & Mrs. White. As you may know there is a 20-foot utility easement along the entire rear of your lot.. Please be advised that an access roadway of 10 feet n1usfi be maintained to service the sewer line and m, been brought to the City's attention that you may have manholes. It has bee, covered the City'e easement with landscaping which impacts access and completion by developer. ay hec completion . covers or otherwise interferes with t of and use er Activity that obstructs, diva e of the access roadway must cease and desist. Any materials placed over the access must be removed so that the developer can complete the subdivision improvement work. The City requests that you immediately contact Jeff Nelson of Sierra Pacific' Development, e Inc., P.O. Box 1974, Lake Oswego, OR 97036 (phone: 503- 884 - 3176) with a schedule to allow the development company to cunplete its work. We believe that of all parties cooperate p the issue can be resolved amicably. However, ;n the event that it is not accomplished, the City will seek whatever legal recourse it may have against the responsible parties. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. 4! lblcurpirildi lhileaSejet c Jeff Nelson Jim Hendry: Brian Raoer 13125 SW Wall Blvd, Tiard;,Oil 97223 ( a03) 639-4171 'MD (503) 684- iiF �4i i•••.iiiii irir•i•ii;i J, Nl4Y1i. iiii•i.ir•ii.iiir••ii . pi /1Y•PP•r•. Wii iii..1.••PYi• i•., r Y••ir i i4 PAGt OF 3 ' /i�Y•ri1 i Y•i.Y•••iiY /• i4r411t.0i4J4' Yii. 'r•q..rrr 441 4.r.Mii Wiiri• nor .i4.•iri.4.0Y'0r.i..Yr4Yi•4 4 - i4413444i' "'ii'•6.rii4i4iiiiri•cs.Y1Y4� ♦.c Yiiiiir•r•ii TO: Jetif Nalco (Phone) 503 -780 -108E; Sierra Pacific Development Inc+ (Fax) 503-684-3176 FRO . P'A tty Lunsford Gay of Tigard 13125 SWi Dail Boulevard Tigard. OR 97 2 (Phone) 503 -639-4171 (Fax) 503- 584-7297 Pii ace talc me irf you d 0 not ;receive all pages of this fax, n4 u From: Self < IN ik\N / l ` o :,', Jingly X ,'Ian ub; ect: Utility easement . ftlillshire Summit [)ate sent: Thal, 30 Jul 19961 :09:36 t'received a ea . from Doug Vakoc 13076' �"�� To nv .reger ►hg my letter concerning the f90 utility easement where the,mck acesse Way Was covered:. Mr. 'Vakoo indicated t•.he f llewin : Wh mho originally started doing leinds ap r , h put dirt over tie mess vay; the engineering inspector (Leths 'heM08) issued see work order; Mr. Vakoc carne in to tillk With Michael Antler on 4in► ,ire top w rk,order was roOs ended; Michael made tiv .trips and indicataed that wanted a rock road; but titter loo ring at the easement could not rind anything that forced the roped•, y la rn r to heave ire; While ' e 4)RO WIS not particularly happy with the results,' Mr. Vakoc thought that ihey came away with th e and rst ndln a that as long as Vakoc didri t plant trees on the easement It Would be OK; he did not receive anything from the City to confirm that; I r. V* do has put about a foot of soil on the easement and wants to use it for a gnIderi area that could be disturbed `t access was necessary; d �,� While putting, dirt on the property, a sidewalk was cracked; Mr, Vakoc had the d rriage repa ed. It appears the City needs to decide what it con legally require gaiven the development ... p pp _ 4 nt; plan approval and the rlr ht� of the easement; Mr Vakoc seems cooperative but Is adarne,nt thaat does not want a rocked access way in his back yard; I City y a � " y � t�i�� h� �; the !t mould get back to him once it had reviewed the a wD a `'' � " _ �ircurnnetances and information he provided. I guess the next step is for Engineering to determine how tr they want to go. 4 44 As you may know there is a 20 foot utility easement along the eritio rear of your lot. Please be advised that an access roadway of 10 feet must be maintained to lservice the sewer line and manholes, It has been brought to the City's attention that you may have covered the City's easement with landscaping which impacts ac%ess and cornplettion by the developer. Activity that obstructs, covers or otherwise interferes with the completion of and use of the access roadway must cease and desist. Any materials placed over the access must be removed so that the developer can complete the subdivision improvement work. The City requests that y ou tmned` at cie contact Jeff Nelson of Sierra Pacific Development Inc., P.O. Box 1974, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 (phone: 503 -fif 176) with a schedule to allow the development company to complete its work. We believe that if all parties cooperate, the issue can be resolved amicably. However, iii' the event that it is not accomplished, the City will seek whatever legal recourse it may have against the responsible partis. If you have questions, I pleas , iael free to contact me, Sincerely, bl Richard Bewarsdor` Plan ring Manager • c: Jeff Nelson lr�n •Hendry Brian Ra e�° g I p Richard Bewersdorff 1 125 W Mall Blvd. Tigard, 00 7223 3 Dean r. Bewersdorff, This letter is being written e � wr tt�� col response to the leer received from you , da #ed. July 24th, regarding the futility easement along the rear of my lot. The law state that to utility easement can be �i�arldscaped and fen►ed at the owners discretion': That tql exactly what I plan to do, I will grant aceiess to the easement whenever it is necessary for the city to service the sewer line and manholes. It you have any questions, please feel free to Contact me. Regards, .Bob.. V hite Home 520 -0101 Work 97+8255 LEGIBILITY 'STRIP 1 ;i` 34 a `' 118 114 114 t►+s ' , ' "ter' SCALE 1 ` =3OA' JUNE 1991 JOB, NQ. 89 --- 340 & 403 - 392- -12 76° `ZOO 372 181_ 296 RNATION-AL, N.CBRG RD T-- OR 9 342 URTON ENGINEERING AND SURVEY CO. 302. - TIGARD P LAZA, PORTLAND, OR 97223 639-6116 309 308' 310 0'; 41,'• CO v,t • October 12, 199$ Mr. Ed Froeman Sierra Pacific 5285 SW Meadows Suite 300 Lake Oswego, OR 9 7035 • CTY OAF ORE 0 l Subject: Access Roads within Sewer and Sturm Drain Easements', ;iii l ishire Developments This is to confirm the findings of our meeting of Friday, September 1 29, 1995, wherein the City confirmed the need for the access road c•nstruction in certain easements within the subject subdivision ar,d the authority established by the Subdivision Compliance Agreement, as follows: 1. The City Attorney has reviewed the conditions of map, the compliance appr��s�ra1, the final subdivision agreement ' stab�.� she .... w . the subdi'. isi.r ,)n bond, d, ea � the r co �.:. the conditions, and restrictions (CC ) Y e subdivider, and concludes that the City has the legal right require a p roads as a part of the sewer ri ht to re uire the access roa� and storm drain utility easement construction 2 .:... .. , . , ' q irG the Citys, approval.Rof ▪ The CC Rs specifically �e u the landscaping within all 'City rights-of-way a and contains a remainder to the property owner to ;obtain . a permit. The original al subdivision improvement plans approved the use of a 110 fo.t wide, 12" thick gravel road. Since that time, the City adopted standard plans . qu. access roadway to include a 6;i thick, � 0 _ . back, that re ire the acce foot asphalt Concrete pavement. sec. attached sketch). 3 • As an new alternative, the use of a g rag,3 Crete over thegravel - . :.. in those areas where the �. would be acceptable �. property o landscape, Also, Maintenance ` ec.� to l�nde�.a ...... ,' owner dos�i �. the use of reinforced fabric .. Services has approved as an i the ac, .. road � pavement that ces�s alternative e to a�`emen v �r � the � enable , toad cors�truet i�an to be larr�l sca ed Howe shraul:d be completed per plan,, i p �' - with this alternative available to the builder a n d %or oro e rty owner wner who n building permits are issued. 4: It is the obligation of the developer to notify the builder and property owner of this requirement to maintain these easement areas accessible to City 13125 SW 'Hall R�vd�r Tigard, O 97223 It503J 639.417'1 D 5� 3) 684.2772 • y maintenance vehicles In tk future, the City ill require the private engineer to provide designs with the F- ubmnission of the preli,minary- plat that pr`∎sdiude ,or minimize the use, of rear .any side yard locations for , public utilities And the City will condition that CC `& Rs bbe approved by staff prior, to redoar~ding to tnst re, the proper notifications, and resstr. ct oyes w . In the locations where secondary access via a sideyard, walk area would be an appropriate substitute, We would appreciate Your assistance' in acquiring additional easements Due to topographical constraints, alternative solutions for access are being required as the result _ of a final "walk- through" with the Maintenance Department. Attached is our final access plan for your review and implementat ion . As time is of the essence, please provide use with a schedule of the work that provides for completion of the gravel roads by 'October 31, 1995. Please call should you have any questions. eerely, Randy Volk, Maintenance Services Letha Thomas, Inspector Randy Wooley, City Engineer Pam Berry, City. Attorney Y, OREGON "HIGH TOR" FND 5f6' 6P'�ON ROD PLAT. OF "fAIGH TOR" `1081.70' 131.02 .. .. 15' CITYOF TIGARD SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT • INITIAL POINT FND 5/6" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "RIJRTON BURTON EMGINEERIING PLAT 0 hk' HILLSHIRE ESTATES" ° , .,w. D 5/8 3 R N ROD EXISTING 15' CITY OF TIGARD UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT OF nHILLSHIRE ESTATI 41 , E' r1Pr' In 1 1 130.99' S 00'06 " 55 W FND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC co AP INSCRIBED. WITH. • BURTON ENGINEERING" oot PLAT OF "HILLSNIRE ESTATES" oui (D.-% 6.60' FNS 5/8" IRON R0 WITH YELLQW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED WITH ... "BURTON ENGINEERING'. PLAT OF "HILLSHIRE EST FIN 5/5" IRON ROB 6ITi YELLOW . PLASTIC AP: INSCRIBED WITH, BURTON ;ENGINEERI B ` ., PLAT OF I'IILLSHIRE ESTATEt 8 S0 FT • • •I • .11.110 Y' (7 , nkE lS / °�11 �1 ,K i1 ?Y...a� �'',..• ',. `� a 1. Nt ", ! ��,a �I I 1 Et'f� ^�9 1..j. ... ,...i r City "fi Itit w, 9Y i' '�•r�, gt. 1� y�� .fie gr�er, k „ p� �j 11 foib °• an w.:int� interpretation , of ', t.r• ,. i;�f► ou.' l�eve asked ':�' �. '� A � ,� t z of Tigard .'s s e! x 1 9 xl I! , , I, Planning Commission n r,�sed . deadlines related to',: development ent of The. helvarious phases of 4 ' t he, Summit at' Bull Mountain .subdivision. g � t x- t aspects of this proposed Ci � �ounc 3.l . have � reviewed ,� vario�.as. f deve lo ment... at several ', different tir s resulting ,i.n a number of it' t .different deadlines r ; .t.,: ai ree, w3N,:.hy,�, [ .t'im limes L: i "important tf.,; n•la G3 tk:` Bt.�ai hteYL ''r'i: r 'out "; 1 i applicable , '�o tlha.s 'P��11 � 77 C /��j�! p 1 t'i '}' YI th�i•I...,: � i r r,Y ♦ ! . , �3" IJ •I hM• a�� 1 y ��' r.�' �,5,f '.•,.. , ,. �, order;..tola�f'avoid.,��•futurs ',, Ynfu.sion. '' , ; ,, , dev�lc�pz�ent,, i.n. 1 1..E•, • June 24, 1992 iKr. Mark Rockwell ' Benchmark Land Company C!TOF TGARD ORE0N A , Director's interpretation' of Tiinelines for Built at Bull � Mountain Subdivision /Planned Development ar Mark t +�'ti�t'•Phase I r '',1�%e �u111a M ®unta�.n •r sa,on�on� i�a ;c:h •�. was ot: _ ,' Plahnin C 7, 1990, with .ti" ei hteen month pp al • h xod• for , subait. tal of a final subdivision plat. The final . plat for . Phase t was submitted in November, 1990, ,,the eighteen month . a roval. period . you know'developer's signing of final.. lad b the Cit . ^, the•. . g approval bias $r been ,, delayed by 'the* axE,i. y to anstruct -improvements; ,to : SW ,135th Avenue and to post, . nab�.git to c - a maintenance bond for the public improvements : Since the majority of the work is complete and the final plat was submitted ,in a timely manner, there is no .pending approval expiration for Phase ie. the Summit at �, wh3.c�i Was referred to as ��;.. ll Mountain Phases 1;1' _ � ' .. Bu .... ' . , p� � _ . ._ � on vase �;a._ hel�1 :._ the ��.ty Ms.� 8 subdivision, was a roveedc� i the planning Commission on n won p �oi�ind.la o 199b, Th® �ca�ni� sx appeal. on June 10th, 1990. eighteen month approVal with thQ period e io felt ion plat began 1 submittal of a final. subdl�:rl.s � 7at decision on the appeal, That approval period was to run until December 18, 1992. . ber 25, . 1991, the Planning Commission approved a �n �e teams s plat �. i..... at Bull. Mounta ,,n rel.i"main.na laic for Phase: FIB of the �um�it s ° . , date, the Commission also approved a subca.��.aion: - re phasin schedule for all i gun ,:ss on's On that a . p g 11 of PD�ases �� seed IIB The C .. n plan for all of Phase �� II effecti- el approval. of the rephasing �' with au ei. hteen month vvh . �e for, , . approval . , r all of Phas® I.� g th a reset the clot p � . 9 3 : There f ore o the final plat for period a ir�ng on Nis +�ch 25 39 . p. for final approval at �.�a��- one base of Phase Tl anust be s. � �nitte 13125 SW Heil Yvc14 P:C>: Box 233 b Tigard; Oregon 97223 (503) b39 -4171 • • • t • a d t e ` neces is a*t City s ignatUr63S . b that ' w,. ate ektension �af that 'approval period may be :requested, a eat�:d t]�e termer ',25, 1991. f .nal order rc:,_ p .4;A J6e ri�ol`u`F�A�'M�n, =". � �Sln�, o un- t Developmeft made . a directive t-rhat the ,Maximum. time tor , Y a pletio'u of all ' phases of the approved planned development e ±S ve . S.� nce the o; 1y port cns of the proposed ;u'L-''{T�n ��a,r� `" maned that were, . reviewed by,, , the Comm is s ian as, .a s i.ng�le packag , r la tned " 4 pP ent were PhL.ses I XA and I IB `i .e.g, , §iutmit ` � .those. Mountain w� ',i:nterpret, t ° is con&Lttaf' to only apply' to N �. ) � ' . neea��.n�i t+�paa�� +me�►t hases, and' niat Phase .I a : he city- of Tiord. n,ga a �rov. hase 'ILA on Pebrtta '21, 1991. �� ed con��dru�tica� p�.an� fer � P .. n', . ion Phase h �,. : aath.gh , �•- SoMe conStacuctio:a has al teddy be ,, a. F ,. � that the � deemed iffiCu1: its i'4eve; aa�t�:�ity has nod! ,ceased. due to tl�Q d, for P,in��e II. ,a.a �d�em�d hr's tun inta. N0w�dause constri�ictiOn act Lvit ' 6' a1, of °these cons t'rUCt " '' 1, .ahs to , %awe ;be�� ; w�.th . ;.app. �, he! paid' nrcr � �ovc+� �►nd all fees must cc�nats�a�tia�n plans must be. �►�� the remainder of P ase II no later than February 28, 19 98. t this clartf i a any confusion that may exist regardin I Y . thhope iha ,. th is development . Please Contact Jerry Offer or Dick Bewersdoiff of the, P ann� n � Division if you have further questions .e . 'one- e� r'el! Murp Co m ni D • : p Develom eut Director ecta � nV®lkenburc h, Seyiu International . Kurt Va Chris Da i.es , Engineering Nepartm a nt Neiman Porter NPO #3 Piles B 1( °.D • Sun. 3 92 16: ?9 6239 ilk P ROCKWELL TEL 503-635-13122 mane 3, 1992 Mr. Jerry Offer Conrnunity Development CITY OF TIGAR D P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregord P. BENCHMARK LAND COMPANY ... • TELE 0PY. Ref Summit at Bull Mountain Dear Jerry: This is in follow-up to the meeting I had with you and Dick Bewerselorff at your office y� i 1 discuss Benchmark Land Company's s armrest in the Summit at Bull Mountain. At Chat time, we discusaedl the duration of the existing approvals and when they would ex ire, and/or creed to be extended. As an example, time ry p phs on P example„ of the summary � ara to , a ,e 13 of the September 25, 1991 report states, The maximum' time for completion F� P P P of all phases of the approved planned development is seven years. Question. From what date did the 'seven year" time period begin? The September 25, 1991 date? Question. What does "completion of all phases' mean? Perhaps the plans for the final phase have to be submitted and approved within seven years? We really need specific gi idance regarding the existing approvals for the &tlrnmit at Bull Mountain. It would be very 1 h � pfei; if the City Attorney would review these ppp specific when extensions are required, andlor approvals approvals and establish s plc elates expire. This will avoid future confusion, and possibly our interpreting the timefrarnes in a maxim' that could eventually put the balance of the project hi jeopardy. Sincerely, Mark Rockwell Partner • ,: d. A0EOA ITE$ STAFF REPORT TO TEE P a 1HG COMMISSION Y MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1991 - 7:30 Pm TIGARD CITY HALL a' TOWN ALT, 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, on 97223 I. SUM ARt OF TM REQ $T CAS ll Mountain a �, �.n as�ra:�ivia� �.an, ghaa�le 2'6 ��maa3.t �►�. Bull sus 91,4013 planned Development eviEw PDR 91 -0005 Lot Line Adjustment 11x3 91 -0007 as17ls\7. "- The applicant re d AI t:a . Subdi vieioa p r elies ��plat/Planned. Development, detailed gait review to divide an approximately 21.4 acre site :(WCTM 251 9 4, : tax lot 1500 and pOr tiona of tiCTRI 281 4, tax lots 1000 and 1100) into 50 iota ranging in size between 7,042 Sggare ".eet and 19,582 square feet. in addition, the pro reed deveiou -any: would include creation ,of a detention pond trams. Toot widapplicant al so t requests o Liine Adjustment approval to add 6;15 fe 9ubdlvi ®ion (tax log 100). from the Western edge t'.�$ the el Toe aubdivided. En addition, .the applicant r esta Lot parcel to nt al, � � rat �irae �►a�uaataaaaent approval to attach Atoproxitately, 3,000 agnate feet front the parcel to be aubdivided to i`eac to t 1401 to the outtheaat in a *change foa� y qu tax lot 1400 which v: uld be dedicated d for px�13r>,. read � �pc ®er�si in anseoc�:aitii�n wit4r the approximately a3�e3. 40500 !► ared auhdi rieion The proposed . The Planning Comeee 2B of 'tat s Summit at Bull Mountain Tea® ro sec# devel east is P2 .. ' ission' continued the hearing hearing this . erin" on portion of Phase 2 from the �loMmieSSion a May 8, 1990 g to allow the applicant to r. edeeigat. Phase 2B iih resprsnhe to concerns related to access to mall Mottntain, Road &Om the subdivision air Wall as concerns with 1a t inittroUM driveWaya entering onto a toll.ector ^ ' for � _ on I�ia... t�, ;�.9��► , 0on , l73lo�Jma�nt Phase 2A i ®ion /Planned De proposal fos" Pha n on the a3en ►constru .ion of Phase 2A has Street. The C om�oais� ®d�u... May begun but the plat has yet to be ruCc 4daad The applicant also ter /death approval . of a rephasir g plan for Phaaasei r the ti,.: is r into seven �A and 2D of t, a Sunit at E3ulX M�' �,...�.a��.ri a�au��.K,V`.e."��.�n �. .aaa�eaa► e APPLICANT/OWNER: Seiyu International 1 dart Vanniolkeuburg Lincoln Center 10220 SW oreen ►urg Road, Suitrb 450 Tigard, OR 97224 R1 ZFI$ES E t IT1lTYVE : 13ThomaeEngineerirag 11945 SWDP Lfic Highway #302 Tigard, OR 9/223 ADDITIONAL OWNERS WCTM 2S1 95A, T:L, 1400 Leah and Mary zednik 13305 SW Bull Mountain Fad. Tigard, CR 97223 W TN 251. 9138, T,L, 200` 4ramOE' 4 Barbara Beck ,l 14005 SW High Tor Drive Tigard, OR 9723 STAFF REPORT - suB 91 -. 00113 /PO 91- .00"5 /its 91/0007 SEir0 �PAOE 1 a PIA 3DESIGNATtON: ,Medium Density Residential ZONING: R--7(PD) (Roai4ential, 7 unite/acr o Plansed Development overlay.) LQChTION: Nori:h side of Butt : £iountsin Road opposite ` SO '130th Avenue, between the Kish Tor ' and Three Mountain Estates subdivisions (Portions of 'Z, T X 261 4, tax lot o 1000 and 1100, Wan! 2,41 9BA ta= , lets 1400 and 1500, and WC MI 281 958, taX lot 2/0). APPLICABLE ,,,ABLE LAW Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.84, 16.92, ' 18.160, 11.164 and Comprehensive Plan POliciee 2.2.1, 4.3.1, 7.1.2, 7.301, 7.4.40 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. RECOMMENDATION: Approval the St ivision /Planned Development reguest subject to conditions. Approval of the lot line adjust%Sst recquest subject to conditions. II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. areesub� subject to this sSubdivisionte proposal contain approximately ��21. that t slightly 21.4 acres. Tax, lot 1400 is eS.�. htA � � than 3 acres in ®�iac�. � lot 100 is approximately 20,000 square feet in air'te. B. Site e location: Tax Lot 11$00 and the remainder of the subdivision site is located on :U3 north side of Bull Mountain mad oppoiLte SW iSeth AVe late. The parcels are located etteeenf the Three Mountain Estates Subdivision to 2A of the east, the High Tor Sulbditrigionx to the west, and. Phase �.,� of the Bull Mountain Summit Estates Subdivision to the nO th. Tax lot 100 in ttilthin the High Tor = ubdivision. C. Existira uses and strugtures3 The subdivision m site is has re already vacant and covered with short grasses. i by en placed .. single-family f amily� residences. 100 and 1500 are occupied bd+ lacea� an the site. T9� lots _ D s ToPouraPhl and dr1lnage t T Fe proposed ®da division site slopes g neraSSy from the south to the north and east, and drains through a drainagesay separating thae Three 24ounttein and BenchviaW subdivisions to the east. The ant s submittal includes analysis g Estates pp y. e�ia map that indicates that is a of the site currently under review includes al®pea in excess of 25 percent E. Surronds_ Sland uses 1 Surrounding properties large' subdivision With Single- family . residences primarily on relatively g = s. A farmhouse itat located on the three-acre tax lot 1406 to t,'ne southea t of the proposed subdis'ibion site. The Summit at Eluss ] us mountain subdivi ®ion phases 1 and 2A to the north are presently undergoing development,/ although no homed have yet been built. P,tan .deeliq ation and :zonings he subject sins; id des �Ma ed for Medium DEanaitw Seth dential use by the City of Tigard ©onaprehendaive Plan, the a�;�erlayp �zo Frog rues).. to the a =:�anitsr4orei and � � ,r Heal R 7 � _ D Reeiaienast� �'xtorth, _ nort�n�ea .. , .. ,• Pla4ned Develo ren st, and northweet are aiitiilarly coned: The High Tot Subdi� iaion le withh;€n Waa,�, nog oat county WOO in toned F.p6 (Residential,, 6i,000 notate foot minim za lot Ste) STAFF REP®RT - SBB 91-0013/P DR _. ...._ .. ��: -oQb . S �� /OOO7 -� �EIYU PAS • r Prr ®a Surnmasxt The applicant requests Subdivic .,ui ;\ preliminary plat /Planned Development detailed plan review to divide the approximately 21044 acre site ('WCT14 251 9BA, taza lot 1500 and portions o£ WITH 281 4, tax tots 1000 and 1/00) into 58 lots ranging in size between 7,042 square £ set andl 19,582 square, feet. ` P po c'�ue creation of a In addition, the ro eed . d�sve�.�5� nt would �n detention pond tract. The proposed development is pha ®e 28 of the Bull Mountain Summit Ettatea subdivision. The Plan.ining Commission continued the hearing On' this pinrtion of phase 2 from the Domanie sign's May 8, 1990 hearing to allow the �;,�, Bull Mountain Road. from the siulnd sae to concerns related to a�ccees applicant to redesign phase 28 in reopo as well as concerns with numerous drivewa ys enterin g o ato a collector street. Te Commission approved the preliminary plat /conceptual plan for phase 2A on May 8, 1990. ,Construction of photo 2,'a. has begun but the plat has yet to be recorded. rhe®e 2 b ttal,fo phase 28 included an 0,..nxteia8�i.Oti of 3W 135th Avenua from P Rot.d opposite SR la 9th Avenue. 001 135th Avenue proposed to be 00itetrueted to minor collector standards with 40 feet o pattee nt within a 60 . £Cot are ri g ht-o£-wa y . �o dZ ivawa y a are intend ®� to enter the Street 'exc(Pipt for drivewayt fey' proposed lots 229 through 232 whic;ti are intended tee enter onto an eyebrow extension of the. an Order tO �s frank iota 247 and, 248 to SW ' 135th, an alley, ie tro seed Off v fraveway Y. �" � � a side ®treet 2.eading to tie. rear Of those iot i . The remainder' Of the road ' ayratem is a network of 1,oca1 atreett tteluding connections to SW Alpine View Lane in the Three Mountain E8tiatoe subdiirition, tO the east,, sw Hi To Drive to the worst, and a street stubbed to tax ,lot 1400 tei the Southeast. The P t ar3 P Po es etera drainage detention pond on a square £ t tract at the in teree tion of SW 135th an Mal Mountain Road. In a bus pull -out Lane is proposed' at f lai; A nteraection f er echool,bus use. The applicant also tequeats Lot Line Adjustment; approval. to add a 15 foot p east aide of Lot 1 of the High. Tor subdiv di tax lot cede eiri to the e g_. P l to be subdivided Thia ad uatment 100) from th�.� western edge o£ the arcs is intended to provide tax lot 130 continued access to the tear of that parcel that it Currently provided by a gravel. roadway On tax lot 1,5004 In a ' PP a Line. Adjustment approval attach aPl'roxima tely 4500 so re 'feet the parcel to be subdivided `to 1144* last 14Co0 to the south ,. ant in exchange fair app tohtaaately 3000 s juas a £t ei` of tar lot 1406 which would be dedicated for public: road I xpOaea i associa�,ioan with the subdiuisican. The additional righte.l)£ -way area; tail: it r w Alpine View Lane cal si!:'eet atateti#axdn as 'to •£u�a to it allOw coon t ot t development the etub ' tA aubdivi�a Lori. �£. this etree�t within Tfiree Mc�uiniii t The applicant � 1 Mountain Of a rephasing pl.aan` r phase A ano 28 .�a�.cant also re the Sun,init at l�nxl untain subdivision into ;�,$ve haees. s Public... service ..arid .ut iit.ieas .tee.. The applicant propoeea ®tore drainage netwc '_ ithin ahaae 2B 4-eainii;ng to either the ei orill sewers in phase 2Aa tc an ex,Ztinig w6Lkhi- defined .. drainageway to the northea it, or to the " ro plied stoners th . ipia a detentiO intereeot on. ..x� in ' t.: ii "i9i fl aoroes pond at the SW 135th and eu 1 2�IOuntain Road �. a pa.. -- the toads drain to �xiet on i�ei 8�_.� �ubd n stoa�n ai®wexs ..:- 5?hFb 518 4813Ct1 ial Sanitary c,auers ould be extended through the site frau planned eewera in phase 2A, e,pcigting sewers in Three Mountain Estates subdivision aid a Unified Sewerage Agency sewer in the Barrington qsi.gbts subdivision. Water lines would be extended througt, the site cnc` Witting to existing water lines in the .surrounding subdivisions. 511. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The applicable apprcvai criteria for a Lot Line Adjustment nt ase found in Cormunity Development Code Sections 18.162.060. The approval criteria for a P�,an eed . Development are found at Code section 113.80 0. The apprt>val standardl for a preliminary subdivision plat are listed ti n ordingly, the proposal list also be found to be consistent with c,he development e a Code Ch Chapter s: ` Code Section 1)3 58 06 .A Aa�� and .�. zone); Chapter �. 2 (1�e4neit�h ®.c�npw, following C Chapters: Chapter 18 <. 5® (N-4.5 4) � P't nn �,_ other �x�ik 18.E 164 (Street and Utility Improvement St da i a) . Standards of of , ' Developmex,t Code chapters may apply to subsequent development of the _ . site aua,�►. sot sxt but are not applicable to the, current review. a . Comprehensive Plan oliciail 2 v 1 this Subdivision/Planned 1, 7 ,. St�►ff also finds 'Gia.,� . s. 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.f .1, 8.101, and 8..1. a apply t o the review tain G of this pt Development ibnraposal as well a s the Bull Mountain y Plan. TV. FI'PO & AGENCY COMMENTS .�. Pho city f Tigard Engineering DeV aryaent has reviewed t he rw�pzra] and offers the following c,ommente a. PtiAsIN4 - .. - � gd 04 and this application: �currently ' has re ested that Phase XI, which is curr n The applicant divided into two sub-phases, i.e sum rephased into 7 different phases. The applicant has submitted a rephasing plan. The Engineering Department generally enerall agrees with the layout of the g a �" and to Phase 6 and Phase 7. As new �a�s�lse li�aer® except with regard P p .. .. by t PP is how Ph: t *es 6 and 7 would ro ds=�d D`i the � i.i.carato the following 3. be developed. Phase 6 Lots 121 .' 133; 240 - 269; and 280 281 Phare y Lote 134 s 139; 260 273; and /91 - 295 The main disadvantage tO this layout is that in Phone 6 tir4re 'w'odid be an extension of a local road without benefit of an cutlet or turnaround until Phase 7 is completed. A temporary trirnare and would therefore be necessary. Therefore it is recommendet that the phase without an outlet. .. ,. �` .. her than 15 feet wit lined he adjusted so that no street be e�: �.ende kip STREETS "° pr vided from S.W. U1 aouatlala ogoad .�.Wh h . s to the bite i.B ra . • . ieca Washington County oa'd Mountain and id hots ae n avat-ling thor `htll�� o .. r Qc--1 n Currently S �. the Site. The e�ti sting roadwa h a l ipii,t d to th � � .. .�; . . P� ., y .. ,. P ,raadWa has a im rcVents m ThQ eA,i.st�ir! rc��:i�uaatel' �� set c' 3 /80o� .. f113�P1��l�t 9�:- 0�9Q5�2�I STAFF 1�Pai�T ��a gi:=�0 AO • pavement . with gravel shoulders era and+ open dit cheib for drag oge- Based on the Traffic Impact Stud conducted nneau En .neering for pp h the. following lane e i+ed b �� the applicant, it �.a recc+m�nended t,► configuration be imnpleaanted along S.W. Pall Mountain Roads A. For the eastbound E�md�J � movement onto S. W . 139 th h v. a median lane with 75 feet of storage; For the westbound to northbound rl,.ght turn movement onto S.W. 139th Ave. �a 1�aBtbounA right ��n l. �a an d school bus stop. em The applicant's engineer ha .L4 recommend that these lanes and the through lanes be 12 feet in width. Therefore, it is recommended that at a minimum the applicant be rewired to provide +he turn lanes as recommended in the Traffic Report and half street improvements in accordance with requirements set forth by Washington County. S.W. 139th Avenue is a .minor collector Street that is the intern 1 connection between S,W. Bull. Mo lt st and the' subdivision. The applica+.nt ° s engineer has submitted plans for the street which meet the c`i'ty r s standards In previous reports for this development (Phase's I and II), it was. recommended that S.W..139th Avenue have limited driveway acaels between l S.W. Bull Mountain Road and S.W. ; Benchvie .T; trace, this proposal that requirement. Y6 . addition, it 'was recommended in the traffic report that S.W. 139th Avenue have the following; lane configuration at the intersection of S.W. 139th and Bull Mountain Road: one inbound (northb Urid) lane and two otatbound (southbound) lanes. Therefore, it is recommended that the a lidant be r # sad to conetr~rict S.W. 139th Ave' to Minor Collector street et: arde and meet the requirements. of the traffic study, Currently Phase .I of this.develciant is still being worked On. As part of the overall development plan, it was required that a connection between S.W. Walnut Street and ti.W. dull Mo amain Read be provided and that it be completed during Phase This will be. accomplished with the development of S.W. 1.391�h with Phase YI -B, I; with Pharaoh I]i�A. It S.W. 135th with Phases I, and S.W. cornl.ferOUs Was assumed that Phase I public improvemefte, inclusive. of the intersection of S.W. 135th, /Talnut,. would be completed and open to the public prior to further developMent This read system, thR 135th ,. `� vital minor collector batwee�aa l and Bull Mo �ntain Road, is a;a, connection for this dereitiviae nt. Therefore, it is recommended that Phase I streets and the lur n `ovem nts to S.W. 135th Avenue be l.at� for any additional phases:p � .:.r'e�:ard�i.iug� of the completed and Conditionally recce ted prior to trig p y All local internal streets Meet the city'''. s standards, except for S : W Alpine View. The applicant's engineer ban submitted plane that that the let* +/- 200 feet of the street being built with 2/3 street This Street Will connect with the ea ietint �s Yaw street Apr ®�rt��entc�. . Ali The _. and. Bn�.. the adjacent subdivision (i.e. hree fountains )e. The Pl�annigiah3:n tgineering Dep tm nts have been i - a eng.. tha,` contact with. the bt licaxn�, ®. t full street i mprc vemenntr wouid be re aired; the engineer is p , acco n g � ' a adi Ustmen; to provide the leubdiv a.c curt® to .,. � 3iS with t'kle r pe lt' X400 ) ntl wor p , h a lot �.ne, � .. ., ,... mice • o rt o�aaaers tca he �iibaa r .... � .. ooh atri dic 3. with the additional l find, app oximatel. a l2 f p at. its w' . p the Street to fell,l lode]. Street i,de�t riiat, needa�d to ; bul.dl STAFF' REPC1�t °'C SUS 91- 001.3 /Part 91°0005/MIS 91 /00gi - standards in order to connect with the existing roadway. This land would be 'exchanged for the triangular shaped piece of land shown oh the south aide of Alpine View Drive adjacent to tax lot 1400. Therefore, it is recommended that the applicant be required to provide fun street improvements to all local streets including S.W. Alpine View; or that local streets have full improvements and that S.W. Alpine View would be terminated at the east end of the first '. lot located emit of the intersection Of S.W. Alpine and Mistletoe and and would only be extended to make 'the connection with the existing road when full street improvements can be completed. STORM SEWER The applicant has submitted a preliminary storm surer syeteM Layout. The proposed development would be divided into throe (3) dig ferent drainage areas. The first area would serve the northwest corner of the development 'With. the drainage going into the existing (as approved n Phase I I- A) eystemmp The second are would serve the northeaset and central lot® of the develop tent with the drainage goij into an existing system within what is known as "Three► Maunta .ne Subdiviigion" to the east. Currently Three Mountains subdivision is still being developed and the improvements have not been accepted by the City. Yn addition, it should be noted that the City of Tigard is currently working with the city Attorney a Office and the eaOlution T st ;Omitted (RTC r .... that on "Three l+dountasi:ns S��bd��rvision" . The developer arid the bank viere involved with Three /l untains are© no longer s o l ant and the ATc would like , to. work with the City to complete the r o ect, but as of this date sus strategy has been developed. It is felt that this is important inforMation in that this developnaent, at least in part, LS relying on public service facilitia^ea that have rxof, yet been fully completed /accepted by the City. Therefore, it should be required p :. ' �torxm sewer y "Three that evidence be �� rovi:iied that tire: i .. s stem Within Mountains Subdivision" is Completed and acceptable to the City prior to any cOmtnecti.ori of 'this, deVelopment to that system. The third area !Old serve the southern portion of th ou e dertielopment and would drain to a detention /retenrgtion peed prior too being released' into an existing sgrete , that is south of this development acrose Bull Mountain'. Road and is outside Of the city. Therefore, the applicant should be requited to demonstrate the • f ollowiags The exis ing system south or S . W. BUl l Mountain Road had sufficient capacity to handle the increased runoff or the applicant should , ")ti requited to upgrade the system, B. Complete details of tae detentions /retention pond, including who will have maintenance reeponeibility for the pond SANITARY SEWER - cant' has eubmi..ted a preliminary aan e�atetm i.se divi.dgml into �. ita� s ®war pla��:. The PP deffe real. the basic layout in y �- tarrative .f storm a sewer ayfitem T . ren a the same ��e � dleta�.l.ed ^^i,ni�he A� n ..:.. ..,.8s,..: 'Y.' i, es, o the e_ y tee th�r r�c�rihwest poa:tion k, :.� �g s ®rued �y t xi:®ting ®as wrrovi es, in l an earlier appi.'� Y 4dv phaae6 the northeast and Central portion bein Connected to c„ti Tha{ee MOuntdine Subdi.vis:iort Lam"`. 4 STAFF Rg +oRT - SUB 91- o0113 /PDR 91 00o5/Mt., Si/0001 bEtY0 4Adik �6 rl the southern portion being connected to a system south of this development within Washington County. Again, it should be noted that the northeastern and central portion of the proposed system is relying on a system that are not yet te�ntial been approved or accepted by the City and that pa problems with that system. Therefore, it is recommended th; t the applicant be required to rate and /or provide evidence that the system they are desmon�grVr � connect, ing to has the capacity and meets construction standards n®f the Unified Sewerage Agency. The City of Tigard Building Division has' reviewed-the proposal and provides the' following comments: A'. Prier to issuance of building permits, a report from a registered engineer shall be submitted. ®he repo building sites indicate suitability location of any fill material placed s g for soil for building construction, and the soil -1;0aring capacity. E • The finished grade of all lots shall have a maximum slope of 2:1, or the engineer shall certify the stability of any steeper slopes. This will include the slope and fill frrcm the excavation for they foundations of the structures. • Private storm draik lines shall be provided along the rear lot lines' of lots 346 -353, 339 -3430 337, 338, 296, and 297. Easements ehrvll be provided whet � t shall be other lots. A recorded with, each access and maintenance agreement .. accessing a private storm drain line. These lots shall have an equal right to J use, andl an obligation to operate and maintain the private drainage, facilities within the private or public drainage easements required. 3. The Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District have reviewed the preliminary plat and has commented that the applicant nhould be their obligation to connect SW 135th tbrougnW the site prior to any further development of the property. This will hol)) eliminate or reduce dead end hydrant y roads. Fire the Tigard Water 3�f,stribt. reviewed and coordinated �.x conjunction wi g District 23J has reviewed the proposal Miss i'a astscons commented 4. thatrthe cDistrict lhaspreviously reviewed, the . pot... lots within n his saubdivision upon school; facilities, and has included, these School D ' c u capacity. ... In addition, the School istrict notes appreciation of the proposed bus turnoff lane on Bull Mountain Road. S. P, , that . _ television service for this area is' provided by �. an Area Communications CommLsae .oan " caul` that The Metro of A.t i at~ cable � � television) has dolumbia h open notify o yi ColumbiaoCable in advance ass to when trenches ill be oe n for tu..ci.y ....telephone saa�rvice,_ so that Columbia Cable can �.easata� ll cable Most efficiently. 6 e c enrol Telephone (GTE) has reviewed the proposal and has cO m►ented that the developers sh "ul:d contact list of requ reMe is applycabla to . , developer t GTE or �� y from submittal this develo. ment. The thou ld allow 45 to Vii© day s oi detailed plans to GTE rior to the start of construction 7 TN! .. Tigard propoSa� .,... . m ents or ob.ectionsa o coranm . ,.�e decd xt Water. District � and ' P�i� haves reviewed the and , have Provided 8. No other comments have been received. ST *** AEPORT _ SOB 91 "4)013/PDR 9 MDG?l v• D.� V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Cornpliance with Communit Develoglent Coded Line Ad ugtraent. 1. The proposed adjustment between tax lot 1500 and Lot 1 of the High Tor Subdivision as well as the proposed adjustment between tax lots 1500 and 1400 are consistent with the approval otiOdards for lot line adjustments contained in Section 18. .060. . alone. additional ].6.06 ®� No a iota would be created by the lot line adjustments ne.. All involved parcels would be substantially larger than tale minimum lot sizes required for their respective roes in the City i►nd Washington County; no setback violations would occur as a tesult of ' the ro aed adjustments; and all involved lots would satisfy the additional lot dimensional standards and access riquirements of Section 18.162.050. Lot line adjustment approval should be conditioned upon submittal of a , final lot 'line 'adjustment survey map consistent with Code Section through recording � plat for the proposed 'subdivision visioi or thatk 'clearly conveys the area` final subject to adjustment in A manner that is satisfactory to both the City's surveyor and the Washington County Surveyor's office. corn hence ... wi tk� Caciraurni�L ] evei.oPae ;,,d:mde,4 «» Subdi visfon�'Piannetl eventgniremeants 1. The proposed lots within the proposed phase 28 comply' with the use standards of the 'A-4 tone district • because the lots are intended to be used for , sincTle- family detached dwelling units:. All lots are substantially larger than the 50000 dgwtre foot minimum last size and exceed the average lot width requirtdnt of 50 feet r even though the Planned Development overlay one applied to the parcel provides for ' +anal standards. All lots are of a Bike flexibility to lot di.iaen ®�. ��. and are dimensioned such that horses should be able to be built upon . tenee these lofts without.. vai,ances',to the :setback otauadardle of th¢� 2. the proposed development Scheme t it �Chac ter 1nt with de�noga r approval standards of a Planned D velopmen (Chapter. y � g.. pr various planned policies and Code b 'the findings. a restented for tnd applicable to the realued•t « Staff chapters the requitements of the f. g ,.. c p that the staff has found pp finds that � ollowin CodQ cha. s are not directly applicable to the current review, although future improvements on the' subject site will need to oonfore with the requirements of these chapters= Ohapter 18.144 Accessory structures; chapter 18.96 -v Additional Yard- r Area tae irement, . gl n. �'' p r ehapt�r l.8 « 9�3 Suildin height Lin�i�.ati�ne: ��ca3 , i ®n ®� Chapter .. � With reviewing. a the cuter 1.8 « � L06 .. Parla~ino�. 18. 100 Landscaping and Screenin , and Chapter 8 L0 - (king.. Staff is charged 9 W improvement® With these standards through the building permit and p.. .... 9 continuing Code sign pa��it review proc�tssa�a; as well ae th Enforcement actions.. h Cc�11lw3:n rou With regatta to t additional .. • .. 3 . _.(i) applicable to the rev ear o etaf �: f inc�s Section 1.8 8® 1�0� , _ _ .. � pproval. criteria£ •�ansaad devel o en a ro ion states that r « dt eets, buildings, nis proposal. 7 his sect p r Si ne sated o preserve and other site elements shall be de � q d and lip the exi ®tin g trees, to p og rw ap Y and na tural drainage to the g re atest estent poesibYe. The nrr proposed subdivision would be located in an area that does not c t any �xistin g �reee « Although the proposed development will include a substantial amount of site grading, the grading plan indicates that the Site will ^on�tinue to .. g• , pug . a p drainage with the exhi:lbi.t the sa�Q �:�e��al to xa. ��ic form and STAI'F PORT - eum 01.00 .35PD 01- G00$ /$i 91/0007 - sit ' Bi PACE t� subdivision's storm drainage network out las1U ng to ;thee 'ravine on the northeast portion, of the property. 4 . The subdivision on under r,- view is ° a" Cont nuanU a of a previously spitted subdivistiioaR Therefore, the proposal n eed not be reviewed for Compliance with Chapter 18088, relative to solar access. The proposal was submitted prior to this, chapter being enacted by the 'City Council. However, ' it is noted that residencea to be ,built in the subdivision will need to met solar access standards for 4`aew construction.' in order to satisfy solar access ,standards for new construction, special siting of haws ` on the lots or. reductions in building ,heightso . from themarimus<a building height specified ` by the It-7 zone may be necessary. 4. The proposed subdivisiossts_ complies With the density standards of Chapter 1.8492 'because the 15.4' acre net developable area off this 'site (after deductions for public' right-of-ways) yields an opportunity dwelling �e �. zoning da»igzation. Fifty-eight single, family ehidentiailots are proposed. . The proposed subdivision is consistent with the requirements a; Chapter 18.160 because: • The proposed stubdivf 'ton cos spliee with the ocssprehelzsive Plan , rtunity'ffor Deng, 4 the ..te sh � well a' with the designation applicable plan policies, the use an..: dimenssssiona1 regulations of the R-1 tone, and other applicable regulations,: • The proposed name' of thy: su ivi i plat Smelt at in WMountain, is not Flu licative of any other ova P recorded rs a `separate ' phase o County. Each phase wo>�1ss£ be p' � the larger planned ed de�elo he nt. for the at Bull Mountain aubdi inioay c. Tho ld stretate a#0 aid out to with alread developed st a tain the ed o !Hi Tor and Three $auntaid aanbdivisions o with ,Sao 139th Avenue across 8U11 p ountain ;Road, and with the approved auiinant of SW 135th within ' Phase . 2A d. The repiAssaing Plano With the revisions recommended bk. 'the 1ngineering Department, should be approved ash conssitent'with the criteeia for approval Of a . phased Subdivision " ( Cod+0 Section 18.160.050g) and phased planned development (Section 18.80.100) . The SW 135th -139th Avenue connection ko #,i EcU • Mountain :toad would be constructed i n the next Bub -phase to b0 Bettchview "Terrace connection to this s ubdivis�io a would he constructed after the alread consstruscted hase one The ,�W plan Would rovide for cesss3 p road co inectionthe rephag he ravids?dl in the following' Bub hasps. T�ai�refor'e, plan � ." Bic ,. ennts� ®e3.i�ig the' general at is an well dig the proposed dev pm early in the development 0105P6664 A ` ary 'p . g po.. 601 can be constructed with each pha#6 without de a nding., upoi temporary paaablic facilitiesg it is necessary for the rephasing o be done as recommended by the Engineering 8epartment i.n",' o t der "t o id the need for temporary 04rn a.rot n dss t the end ok thn toad within hase 6 and th avo�. dead end Street ira P� c c.rea►t�.dna of; sin s�xcses�ively' long" ... ev+t�n i�E it � billy 4 temporary eitaat3rcA4 The total time for cones irua tLQn of all ` phiiiti es d insslot' niNtee Y........ p n .8.80 -10O a�evescss eaa�aa asa� ®mac � f mead, b "" Co a Sectio STAFF RBFC>tRT .. Su 91, OO1* PD1 S1 ..0 t y; • 1 The proposed aed subdivision' is connistsnt with the re.. iaixements of Chapter 18.164, or can be. modified to, be consistent with these requirements, because: a. The applicant will be required to improve the SW Bull Mountain Road frontage of the site to County minor roileetor street standards m. The applicant wi,11 be required to develop the SW 139tb.SW135th connection to minor Collector standards. The applicant's preliminary plans �e ro id�riditr� fihii, street to have adequate gradient, and other minor collector rov•,aente con The P sisteant with Co�cne staxadlar��is. revised 91ans firs: phase 28 provide for driveway access to this colleetar street - to • be limits to only the eyebrow serving Proposed lots 335-338... This limit on driveways is consistent with good design practice for collector streets as was railed repeatedly in the review of phases 1 anti 2A. c. Other internal streets will be required to be developed to pre1itain y lanslfor developing •intnrnalm subdivision applicant's City Tigard e are consistent al street width, ar with Code standards fog laao P �yP. grade, ,turn .artaind areas, sand improvements, with .the exception , of. a wed for a circular turn around area at the end of the local 'street in the southwestern corner of the site. a turn around is' necessary, to ovoid the need for vehicles backing onto • SW 135th Avenue in order 'to turn around. The proposed alley serying lots 311 . and 312 is co at lists t With the toquirementgi of s l . nkr goat width standard for alleys within residential ari �� lb rua�,imiuun plot 'depth-to -width eistont with Code standards for The proposed loth are ..con... satin and o#:her, lot dimenPions,l standards. All lots are dimensioned such that rectidenCea should be able to built without neCeseitatint vauriancee. e. The ro sed sanitary and atom Sewer ayetem provides for P Po logical; •cO l.ect,ion ay®tem's through the 41eve og:ccent. ApprOttal applicant �temgnrntra 3:n, �• � >:ted upon. the _ to the eatiefaotion of t g to the Saagi,neer3.nr� of the relimi na plat Should be „on st D3.vieiorn that ot.ozm• drrainage from the prropoeed,development. , can be cliechar ec into ear Zetin storm aewd,a, and from these Hewers to downet> oall�n drain .. . Y ... . . draining aptly 'impacting downrnotreawa so rtie ®.Q Development � to the) leer Las the RTC .- tobl sat With the the Three Mountain® subdivision should be delayed anti l th e term s ®ere .n „th.ie ad j adjacent devel en t. 1aa order to City o overcome this delay, it may be neceseaary for the curs;ent applicant to beoome involved in reaothts on of the pxrab .'enw With this downstreams Storm Sevier'. ComoliAnce With,,. onn ;rehena ve . �l.an Pal c es a The oubdivieion a consL®tent with P a1icy 2.1.1 bect:aua I notice Of r he appl .scat on and the p',lab1ic hearing on thi a item G■as provid ed to the both Neighborhomc Plaanniho Organization t7 and Waebi rgg ton County in the Vicinity o • 3r ana,zation # B a well alt t ere of property �omnn�anit planning �.-� a had been . f the s�ttea The ro red development site poster with a sign noting that at Land use oar develoothent appl.Lcation Lh this site wA® pendi:04 / P. 91 - 0005/MIS 91/0007 ' - 5s1 PAGg 10 STAFF REPORT - sus 91- Q�bl.r , P� ■ • In order to comply with Policy .4.2.1, a conditifi,Jn is warranted to require the City to, develop an erosion corntrol plan enuring m! n r compliance with erosion control. standards for the, Tu$lati,n •Rive Basin, as part of the grading permit application. . This subdivision proposal complies with Policy 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7, 4 4 because the applicant will extend public sewer and Water • y � ti � . lines. systems to this �,xite San will providevforeunderground installation of phones elect:,e�..,oity, The proposed subdivision is consistent with Policy 8.1.1 Which requires the City to , plan and develop a safe and efficient fitreet Read and the other proposed streets Hall • system. Bul]. Mountain R _ : Avewill to The proposed extension of SW 135th SW 139th providerdfor adequate and cafe access through the proposed Provide as well as much needed circulation between adjacent g subdivisions and, between Bull ;Mountain Read and SW Walnut Street. • The required improvements to the Site's SW Bull Mountain Road frontage will improve traffic, Safety along this stretch of 'this' relatively narrow road. P . The subdivision proposal complies with Policy 8.1.3 because the proposed improvements to the public streets within gli nd adjoining this Trite will be required to be consistent with City',of tigard or Washington Count y public itta � �v enemt standards VI. CONCLUSION AND RECORMENDATI0% The staff concludes that the proposed development, with Modifications, e of the City and will not be ai ntf ic�tlY detrimental promote a g rura complies rc�pa ©te t,�e general welfare � vided develo ant that oc. nor injurious to surrounding land uses►, pra with, applicable local State and federal laws. royal of this Subdivision /Planned Development and Lot Line Ad:. ustment • ropoSal3 which 'follows Staff recommends ale Subject to the recommended Conditions UNLESS OTHER 4ISE NOTED, ALt CONDITIONS SHAD. BE SATISFIED AND PUBLIC I PROVEtitNTS COMPLETION N SHALL BE FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE�FINAL PLAT WITH 6 ASHINGTON COUNTY. STAFF CONTACT FOR Att CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IS CHRIS DAVIES, CF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT UNLES1 OTHERWISE NOTED. ' the final F s sue erection of an .. lots as i l*astrated on the applicants ... the 'e 1. additions 58 eta fog. phase... two Shall b = lim a to hmit,tal for pYryaay�_ 2S All lots Shall be fully d .mensioned on y the Linal Ia e a � alai'. Plat . sa p cdneistent with 0 sn #s e a . diStrict di:�aean.��wx�na$ re it Shall be revised in the area of lots 309 and . 310 to' pxc �vid0 for an adequate turn around area. may be reph Se i into seven . su - a r e as lines l trated in the a licant a sea 150 feet pP . r submittal, With the eaccegtl.on► p . _ . . ......., ,... _ .. ... , � � without Phased 2A and 28 �n adjusted so tbont no street shall be extended further than 15 an outlet or x naroUnd. The applicant shall submit a rev#..la ,a phasing review . .,.gad ao rP tot va basin a Sommuni 3y D loPt :nt � irectorc m app Staff of cha ges of ` p i...,,g p..,. benefit aricels do mayn oa:�ove minor than � may an e® da not affect the ,prow]. ®�.c�ux of rci3�is��.on utilities the tha ma p res id ..ern b z 16'4 line ad justrmeet between tat lots ].400 and 1500. shall be a niabddSb� ,l ide for a pp ' xo in order pto.. r connection of sW Alpine View. The t posed lot ii* 4 o ad3 stment r. � element of the lot to Dse re�carc�R•.� �� pe STAFF' REPORT t00 .#i OO 3 /PDP'; g1 0005/M5 91/0007 , „PAGE ].1' • r4 between tax lot 1500 and tax lot 100 , (Let. 1 of Hi Tor subdivision) is approved but is. not a necessary element of the subdiviuion approval. Recording of the lot line adjustments separate from the plat: recording may p through following t�.e final lot line adjustor nt map review be accomplished process specified by Cede Prior to issuance of building perruits, a report from a registered engineer shall be submitted for all lots on which fill They report shall indicate the location of any gill material placed on building sites, for for building construction., aed the moil- bearing capacity. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division. the suitability for soil fo ac3 �torg►8 n etas r lope of 2:1, or the The fin:i.s�hed grade of aA.�. lots shall. have a sttsa�xfxaa= ® This will e:a.gineer shall certify the stability of any , pe slopes. include the slope and fill from the excavation for the foundations of the structures„ STAFF CONTACT: Bred Roast Private storm drain lines shall tie provided along the rear lot lines of lots 346 -353, 339e343, 337 3301, 296, and .297. Easements shall be provided where crossing other lots., A joint access and maintenance agreement -r hall be recorded with each lot accessing a private storm drain line. These lote shall harre an equal right to use, and an obligation to operate and maintain the private drainage facilities within the private or public drainage easements required. STAFF CONTACT: 'brad Roast, 5. 'gwo ( 2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile tins drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the algineering Department: ' st i � ofa p 9r3vb drar wivgs .and one (I) itemized d con sitruti on oa mate, d p spµ Fr en s Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval val (NOTE: these plans are in any drawings p'by e Building Division and h. ald only include sheets relevant to ubliciepravements p d to "Bro. art of Control public improvement drawings. p The plan shall conform f.a�raprov control l�►. ion ,on, • any 6. An e.rca'sioac2 � shall k�e . provided as �:I, Technical Guidance Handbooik November 1989. 7. The applicant shall deeonst�: ate that storm ' drains a runoff can be d,thcharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. i∎0. l and a topographic map of the dr inage ba i r area s erm drainage details shall be rovided' L p map shall be provided Calculations a supplement p the serviceable v nt plane. .l aa:2s . of to the public improvement plane. Calculations shall be b abed on full development a. p y g P be The location and Capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall addressed. A grading plan ohall be subm tted showing the existing and proposed contours and typical finished floor elevations : "s* each lot, including the elevations at 4 different corners of floor pla' tied to the top of curb elevations as shown on ti's public a mprovemeet plans. Storm and sanitary sewer systems, Within adjacent subdivision, ®(Th.e. Those in proposer Phase 2 -S that will ( hree i�Ll cs�n � �,�� c sea°va.c ,� the _ such time ac Mountains Estates), shit l NOT be gra tech Building Permits unta.l suc as those improvements have been completed and accepted by the City ty of Tigard , ... not '. be � rrcii�.tei� Of accesse d .. . . � .. 11. Lots south of tai$ �.ntarrse ' .a.rectl. onto 5'oG�. 139th Mistletoe shall not be pe - y chv eve Terrace sn . o Aventnie STAFP PBPORT a 603 91,- 0013/Pb 91.0005 /MIS 01/0001 e PAGE 12 12. All street improvements within Phase If inclUding S.W. 135th Avonue, shall be completed and conditionally approved by the City of Tigard and Washington County prior to the recording of any future phases. 1:1. The applicant a iy i d minimum, the lane Configuration as rec ndeda in the Traffic Report and h half street improvement to $.te', Hull Mountain Road in accordance with requirements set forth. by Washington Count; 14. The detention pond, which was approved for Phase 1X--A, shall be completed and accepted by the Unified Sewerage Agency, with written verification provided to the City prior to recording any of the now phases which will drain into the Pond. APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID ONLY IF THE FINAL PLAT FOR ANY SUB- PhAS21 OF PHASE 2-B IS SUBMITTED FOR CITY APPROVAL WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS /DECISION,. THE Mit.XIMUM TIME FOR COMPLETION OF ALL PHASES OF THE APPROVED PLANNED' DEVELOPMENT IS SEVEN MS tat /FC- SVS91 -23 TOR b !c ef:AC moor 4 = Y (\ 1 } 6 MOUHTA 4 pp- e Ipll �'' 441-:41 *1674 JArtio mAm �.,..W. .w.........._.....__.,._. `,ice -pmt EW INFzb viE6 The City of SUB 90 -0005 SUB 91 -0013. to Mad itiilit liti &:041 rsviiiiia ti•aliia i. t ►,'►i� ti 114110 Yiillrir, Cii�ib� life 004046Il i Spµiiet tit') isliiiis, tiial"i� biylr�pe�l ildi bii to iiisreit it bi iiii .1,1 ii4)4g0ii l�ikfiesi ieijWrr riit:t`gYiltliiri tpli' wq titi tiiii! II 1!3 Ft /.Yi Ilpill ' �npltY�►b�lr e iCI (fl;SS1tit%,,' STAFF REPORT :SUP 91. -b6 a /PDit 9iO004 , � "� SEa3LU' FADE i • '1''08, a I t B :" TEST FO, coEMENTS DATE: '0%00:' Tigard planning Depart at �SI01i a1. -+AA . �' R�►"B '� It ' f .PDT M' L —� alb ,. ,ogjrr_g_r_.., Nn,! = .:'s] 2 1a903 .M,.VINA , AnJASusla HIS 424:$0 � Ata Ah 1 LifO"l 8 lai �.b nt cr�n� v��a � laid Approval. Of the aju�ea® �fl��.tprc�ltminary� tNA I�HA um #3) The a lica.tint r® ee has b cc e plat/Planned IIi oh p . Thin ap& licatLon known "n' 1 is �a coast amation of the review of u Phae II of the' sumM .t at Bull ' onntain subdivision. The original review ret ue ed; 1) SUbdtvision/Plannedp Development approval to allow 97 acres to be divided,, into 276 lets between approximately SA CO and 32,000 square fOet; 2) variance , approval to allow an inc* eased let width to depth ratio On Certain lots Ohero a ratio Of 2.5:1 is normally required; Pp iota on slopes that a ,ce ed 3 a Sensitive {Lands rmit to allow � , of A rov�ral was granted, for the 25% grade, and; 4) two ��. Line �Ad juet�shts. � pe 11ow �ieveA� nt northern 215 lots (Phase Iig) and the method for abodes to SW Bull 140untain toad was continued by the Planning Commission and. shall now be I cvieWed. Also, the originally ltr referred! that the PhA ninY into is n ien approve sub - phasing of what was even sub - phases.. BONE: R ..7 Op) ) (Residential, 7 unfits /acre, Planned Development) LOCCA'TI0N. 3u1l MoUntaiat aoad (9 � )anus of W 135th arad a� 139th AvenUe at the south, and the eac�.e'ti W 251 tai . r lots .x.02, 103: ®i�71t11 s 104, 200, and 251 40 tax tats 900, 1000, 1100) Avenue at the north edge Of the ®cxbdilvi Attached in t he Site e Pl an and applicant's a n review. ItrOM infonnat!on suppiie d by various de artmente and a anci, rand from other information available tar otaf f , rePort and recommendation w$.g be preped and a do ci ®ion win be tendered, on the prop +sal in the near future. If you wish to coattAktt on this application, We need your cotaaailta by," i 1901, �Cou may use th0 space provided he loo or attach a separate letter to „, -retur i your Comments `' unable . i , �......�...�, .... p ,tepi in exiting re contact + f tau are Tunable ;to *-e® >nd by the .above . ate leas�l phone ha staff soon contact all gA otad below with your com�aente and confirdn our Cdr. n pos . ) any iu ,aregarding N ,ter contact the °V%ard PlanningDepartment, PO Box 2139713125 SW Hall blvd. Tigard, OF 91221. PHONE: 639- X4171: a' �w , At?'F coIdTACT Jerry; offer PLEASE !CHEC1C THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APEX: We have reviewed the proposal and her a no objectione to it. Please contact of os /. 02'g 1,14.e. Please refer to the enclosed istttr. Written coa iente d Name of Person Aommenti.ng. Phone Nt ber yi a• • • S• TO: REQUEST FOR, COM4ENTS :..ra...L......nc DATEzyxCruat ®.�,�I.1 FROM: Tigard Plaraninsi _mcapartatent RE: ER § rx o t x_ MD C AV , R 91-i » . sTinci, sL; 2A-0003.14,- SE/YS _NATIONM ( 3) The appli cant requests Subdivision preliminary p3.at/Plartned Development. conceptual plan, of the �.._ z, that has � knrbin as Phase $7 f of the Summit at Built • untmia subdivigirn. This a pp lition 1(a continuatic)rii, of . the revie~o t of 1`'aaso 11 Of the Summit at Bur„ 1 Mountain Oubdivision. The Original rettiew regulated; 1) Subdivision/Planned Development approval and allow 97 acres to be divided into r16 'lot® between app lctmatetyr 8,000 a and . 320000 square fit; 2) Variance approval to al .ow an increeeed lot width to depth ratio on certain lots where a ratio ei 2.3:1 .e netaaally requited; 3) a Sensitive Lands permit to allow development of 54 lots on elopes that exceed 25,1 grade, and; 4) two Lot Line AdjUstments. Aglireval was granted for the Ma-the:eh 215 lots (Phase ' method access Bull Neuntain Ro:St was cet rued by the Planning Gosani sioaa and shall now be Also, the applicant requests ttat the g a pp i p es n E o - t Was originally referred to we hase 11 into seven so 1psses . ZONE: R-7 (PD ) (R sitl ©ntiati, 7 units/acre, Planned D evel nt) LOO TXO : Bull MOunteLr Road ,and SW 139th Avenue at the south, and the existing ?eoUthern terminus of SW 135th Avenue at the nosh edge of the ®ttibdiviaion. (WcTM S1 9,, tax lots 102, 103,,. 1040 200, add 251 4, tax lots 900, 1000, 1100) ;;±d applicant's statewaflt for your review. From in er:ndtion suppled banvaric�ua departments and ageneiea and from other irlfor nation a ..po available by . and xa,4 town will � prepared va�:l to our etai�f, a report and odamend�a�. to and a ccamm�nt, ®n this a,L Y� �tiond we need! �a ur O Y i�a" -the near future. if you wish' Grp' d p , o tiOni�e by Aug; 19,, 1921. YOU may u ®e the space provided below or attach ai e?eparate letter to reeturn yoUr cotaatente. he abotre date. p 4ease p'none3 the Staff Contact noted below with cur comments and c, ',Our i .. writing . roe �Q>4� are unable to reeomnd hg t . noted y i potas�i.lblF�a,, If you have any grae�ati.ons rea,grding tnia :flatter, caanta�t the T- �..�ard d cornf L;a`� our cc�.�ornent� n tar t n � ariJ �o 9 P a^ 4 , C?�R 9i223. �PIO!�'E t Planning Department, 29397 r 1312.,rr 551 Ball 161vc�. � Ti and 639.4171. STAFF CONTACT': clear,. '3C, .®f,,;el sr .�., PLEASE CRECA TR FOLLOWINu XTSMS THAT APPLY: Wt have reviewed tLe proposal ` and have nag objections to it. Please contact of our office. ...ores +..bm.3�.... Please refer to the enclosed Setter . written Comments: Na!ne of Person Phone NU thbitir .�._ .. .. hi. r.' dIiSAfl3iE1 ,4i X5'11RVE ` 11945 W P''1.:'IFIC hLGH JAY:. ## PH (5O3)G'39 11& Jerry Offer- City ,-of Tigar, , Box 23397 13125 SW tJ � i'' B l v '.' !'igard, Oregon 97223 Surhnl1 t t Su 11 friounta Phase. '2 '8 approval Phasinc; of final porI3i bons of Dear Jerry: Herewith small maps showing Iuhe proposed layout of the Mentioned projetit. We have previously subrnitt2" this revHieW, but this m ,p changes the order, of phasing for proposed phases 6.7 ' and 8 as shoon hery,ew th . We are requesting to i ryoceed with 'ppr�ova, r s s fo'1 1 tWs 1 . Approval of preliminary 'layout of 'pha e 28. 2 .' Approval of phasing as designated Orr the enclosed i nc l udi n(, both pr'` u i ous l y designated phases 2A and 26 w f th r eW phasing desi gna t i car; },w as denoted on the included maP . .o i ncere l y, Thomas H, 800to "-re/�� 07 "4.7--;:ty-7 174:1 �.M�1.,FnMn OW' M»+ene•.p.W�v.t�wry�. URTO " • TIGARD, 0 EG©(' X7223 4.+ 00000 a33 _ _ _ _ ...... 00414 0.0000.10 0001 . ..... 11 00 rI.. 4llr1Jt4 1 I a .r1 ! r.l..r. r1 ! .f1.. 1. .r• 4•i1r IA 11401400 00 i 1 1 . ..� 'l 1 {..4... ♦ 1 • R•ii w 1.4 1•l +.414. •�/ .1 . 414« 4 4w. ... +r... ... 1 .. 41� 4 1•0 II J 1 444 4A 0 !.11.. 1.1.1 1 i��'��,J1rYJ�! rr44.11 r 4lw•141.,w +4 {` Jr ....1 , i,.1 •„ 110 �tH. .�.1 e +1w .1..i Y x11,0 w4lr01 Ir �wi1.�• 1141400. I4. !1444••111 ! 1.1 ...... .. 000 11000040 1 110:.111..111110. e.6 A 4r...! . _. 401111010,. . 01,1 4... 11.4 .1 14141:. 1010.1 ! 1.14.1 ,4;/ .4 .14440.4110 0 w...11101 ..4.. i • . . r11 r (..AI . .41 ... 04004i .44 ..... 11 .1.! r,1,..1 141.1..44 .4.+ 1 Ir 41..414.1. -4 41. A A ..I ..1 0444 .rIM41w1 ,�4ri 1 1 n ,. 411 0,04•4.1010,400.111. 1111 ! . ..0444wi11. 114404..« .w.r«I'14 0, 411. r4 wli.Yl i 1 r�,ii C 4litar�Y 111r 1 a. 1 1 r1 w1lY 1.4 .104. 0 4..10 14r w1N41 1 i 1114. 4 44 r4Y .000 1311 0 4 Or,0.. w.1.111.1. .040 0040.0 11.1.4«. n.•114«;�A 4:. wy� e r kV44•.wj h, 4.01 101.00 _� A .4r.l010 reply . 0 No reply hCbe i •1 . -.. . � .., "::�: a!, ..,. , K4vis ,. h; .l.i,. r?w.. i ,. .l✓, -:1 n ro .,.., xn. .1.w M y 23, 1990 Mr. Tom Burton Burton Engineering Co. 11945 SW Pacific MighwaY Suite 302 Tigard, OR 97223 SUBJECT: Traffic impact Study Bull Mountain Summit View Estates Tigard ad Washington County We have completed the traffiC impact analysis and study for the subject project in Washington County. Throughout tho cnalysis we have discussed the Project with Washington County (Mr. Daryl Bteffan)t, the City of Tigard (Mr, Randy WooleY) and 0.D.O.T. (Mr. Ron Failmezger) to retelive their input. Most of the recommendations presented in this report have been discussed with you However, if you should have any questions or would like to dicuss the work, please do not hesite)te to call. We are submlttlnga total of five copies for your use and distribution. LI J ne SAC Columbia, o5ulte 520 Pottland, Olt 9' 258 03) 228-950T ,•, IMPACT STUDY FOR BULL MOUNTAIN SUMMIT VIEW ESTATES Prepared By C ARBONNEAU ENGINEERING l Y. 1990 ntrddUction .` Site . Description and Roads Traffic Flow Analysis Vehicular Trip Generation Capacity Analysise • Traffic Signal Warrants Traffic Lane Requirements Summary And Recomn;\e 'at ii ons Appon i x • • i • e i o e r • INTRODUCTION ANC _BACKt ROUN( CHARBONNEAU Engineering was hired by Burton Engineering Company to perform the traffic impact stud,+ for the proposed residential development i n Washington 'County.. The project i s to be located northerly ther l y of Bull 1 Mountain Road (near SW 1 39th Avenue) and south of Walnut SFree d on 137 acres as shown on the attached dhed vicinity map. It is being developed in three se p ar ate phases totaling 486 single e phases were analyzed in this report f ar�� homes. All thre • I n discussing the Project With Washington County's Department p , g ° �° Transportation, � and following t 1 ow i n their requirements rer�ents for of Land Use and Frans ort�tt i deve l opmelta 1 "access reports a' , the project scope was defined. , . .t ocation Impacts to the existing v � c 1 n i .�y roads including access 1 traffic safety, feasibility, operation, trip generation, distribution, traffic; flow, sight distance, turning .. lanes, signalization are analyzed in this r Study: The County indicated it would 2005 u l d be necessary to include 1 uc�e Y ear �5 " i n= pr4ees� " f Utur0 traffic in the study. Background data f car the f ore traffic pats f urn i ached by the County for • gu l 1 Mouhtt i n R040 snd the 6a l nut' Stdreet at. gW 121st Avenue intersection. N+ aly..s is 169 ih 7 � an . k ; . , . , .. 7ca�e tM�e projeot Lvi °11 not- adversely pact any roads, tr�ets, o • inter se�t'icans . - these findings are wised, on the current street ;oho i t for s and seVera l props set rosdi ay impr ve ent` prc ects i dent • eo by the agent i es :w� „•,,,.;,;_ r wiry . • • .y • t..uvii ST a' .'n eq• 3 ' ▪ v. •' �(Cgig• • � a imsout rr±aiaTbRi ,tn' „ c t i CC �� ; • dA10 CNA R 4 MO 61J " a. GT : .i gyp/ /a ►r' . CMOs t oA 0 NON :.cr�TPiF• ta CAU {� ° A YIIR CT L''T� IDIN! } MR T , _ , ' Ems[ P IeRM. ,� wrLrre {,It / .iiiros • ...calcaroaa oar 4 i A•,rCL . LN 1 rLT HAYSTASR 1 ig r1 cT Q•�C`,OIM9S d OAL S, u us . K Vr OT S 4An0 A4� d 0 r li• e 0 SS C . OMAN a►I TAV ,rtunInc n yw1• e>aIRCN� arm- o- 9 C TT LW i.EAMAN ,..u. q 0 PITS P kct ►t .'..� SW n• .(OTA �T �+ 11, pfa'rti rP " n PURLCREST OR 9 ,:ti. /LILY CUR S M ti *W00% .�: �_ SUMMER .. " w ;Ilk' TlGARb ST. T ( MG 1 V `� 0 ITTr�N� MoerTONe. S' r Ia T I;RF4n�* LO* I bUVALL MIT' OK w000W PC, I1k111 T. V `�(, ��• KATMFAIIVlENi w !w sso t /,I A ° ,v. , CLIF C MOMNSNO N - 1 3 �r/o ▪ Ma A00W �4n �, v sj y • r. ,•. mots. N L S A• ,.. �j i IN . ?a �'c� r` r L NN ` ST X111 Ott 01 n KaN r � �%I n�� yp4ti i�piUR$c�IlAtlgnb n Q h : I r , o� �' C / w Sr u a , T • T 1 � r NOLL Dil � C r1IPiIT •�L = E R ROL ' rl% 9 N ` d '%l BEyEI.Af� WALNUT t 4, o�� ®�.��.. on MAN i i ; �� P. 6 a: � . k, . N� • f \� g , <3• 61,4,4.;\ � d. oon�ioA rP'� P-. p �fi y'Yy r ON't CARMEN ST `j'E 1 qC• 'v 9� FE N ALBERTA roN i �o�yY� / r G A k '�" Me"�IfonN�r ERN P�-y , " rG / 11 :° ,q JAMES CT 4� ti s rI7[)C. `a CRE 7:11 j It beRnrOe fi cO! 217 lPMft to ,. r�1 "we� � ��' b "0■ ' d, r o ca�a valid sr il� c c m LEde Ra L N �' ' ' ' .. CO13k on ` :� at li° 6 j ' �. r / IR61AE?eti �® :A h COTTO Wb L MT • MMT m DORO rV CORAL LOCUST HEMLOCA PL EL OAK NARY SPRUCE PINE Y' I ' .ti FAIR R UL L n► 0L FriSE.V OR wMa1Nr !SP LN c HiOH TOR , I� GAAAi90E .r. a C 1 �- lcoRY,�' �..o.e cT rto° i 7 4 w — 0 I, aid 800, .: Y N �y PU nj o F - ,4 � o � E ■Of t, KING � �.``✓ GIT Y 1 Hi1LVIEW Ci' '`�" � MC OONRLD STI ►a>aFp� `i p� �N�ela !Wit STel ELROSE CT /`�•`raYNC� N 0 ' .�, :..IO+R15'tliMiiEvl�6 Ma,OIES IC CgFke H A8 E l • 0 (11x11{* mA aoW Tiem - CnL S1Y C!I 0!! cENTER Rn ` .LAtt ktitt_tt I N dweo cR �, £BUt11TA IflOEG ERORWAY sa*OURG S' LW ST a R INTl r pr tKe{j t►inlir rrNcT�wa�,B CK g. R H, r J i N ids t! - N NIW Cr ®, �� Td LssLiE cr 11AR1 CT Wink cT C0 c ST SAT LER. { -n • d ES)iAIA 4. ,. '!• Mir 0 CNER I ROY R' GRAVEN a .A Wit 'I� W LLs Lib Rb cAI MEL FiSCNER rv,eL i �. `OONOPV 0,11e aalL r' 44044 • CHEM%K tljt fl 1 J yJ� W • In establishing the project scope and analysis, a number o'' steps were identified to complete the study. These items included: Accounting for pr o~ ectod traffic from this deve o pment consisting of 486 single family (SF) homes. Consideration of the future Year 2005 traffic and road o improvements. 0 Definition of the study impact area based cn traffic impacts of 10% or more on critical streets and inter- sections. Aden of ication of the travel lane and traffic control area roads. requirements on the impacted project o Analysis of tray f i signals, turn lane c sa • ,� and capacitiesti storage requirements, sight distance a appendix to the report nont ins technical data including capacity cit analyse:, and trip generation: 5 I `rE pEME1 1 t1.. ANN ZAAiDS The proposed Bull l Mountr i n Summit View Estates development W i l l consist of 486 s i rs r l e family units constructed on undeye l oiled land- Access t® the development w i l l occur directly onto Bull Mountain R _ ®ad from the sou th side and SW 135th Avenue from o the north side. ul be extended �o south and a number of Southwest 135th Avenue will • ^ the sou near r .�� constructed tructed within the development to provide for traffic 1c circ�,u1at o and access. The access to Bull Mountain Road .:...t i on occurring at 139th Avenue (ex i st i nY south will bra a new connection side strest) gar near this location o • -a M i n order to evaluate the total traffic impacts for this } development, it was necessary to analyze both the AM and PM peak hour traffic Conditions i no l ►u l i ng the site generated Volumes. Trip generation for both conditions is discussed later in the report. Existing streets in the area which will be impacted by thb site traffic include Bull Mountain Road, SW 135th Avenue, Pacific I- i ghway 99, Beef Bend Road, Scholls Ferry Road, SW 121st Avenue, and. Walnut Street. After calculating the amount of generated traffic and the anticipated distribution patterns, it was determined that streets and intersections ' ions beyond those listed above would have less than a` 10% traffic impact. Therefore, it was not necessary to analyze other streets beyond theso limits. Near the proposed site acces on Bull Mountain Road, the existing configuration of Bull Mountain Road cos i sts of a two wo lane two way road. There is 22 feet of paved surface (two `11 f coot wide lanes) with two to four foot wide gravel shoulders, The posted speed is 40 miles per hour. Intersection sight distance at SW 139th was _recorded at 510 feet west of 139th and 550 feet east of 139th. Speed surveys reported by the County revealed the 85th percentile to be 46 to 50 miles per hour along Bull Mountain Road. Ther fore, the existing sight distance to /from the existing intersection point at 139th Avenue is adequate. There are vertical roadway curvy .. . . ; ....._,,s to the east and Weft of 139th � on Bull Mouns i n Road wh i'ch 00.0' ®1 the sight d 1 stance . Due to the sic i st i ng topo r°aphy avid roadw y graces ,; l Deaf b` the propo .. available visibility. ty. Also the County's standard for locating gppo site ''-shaped" intersections next to each other is 365 feet. This distance is based on the minimum left turn storage distance of 100 feet for each intersection and as median transition length of 165 feet. Since the sight distance and left turn median storage length would not meet the standards unless th a hew access is located at 139th Avenue, it is will be necessar y i`' o locate . to the new access at 139th Avenue The other access for the proposed development will be 1 e)cated onto SW 135th A ienUe when it is eXtended from its present location ation just south of Fern Street. Southwest 135th Avenue then intersects with Wa 1 nut Street where it is controlled by ra stop sign Wa l nut: Street is a two lane street heet postod at 35 to 40 miles per heur as it passes through a residential neighborhood. The paved width is 24 feet. Street and intersection charact ®n i s cs for ether critical locations ►ere also reviewed in making the study., The data was recorded and applied , sd in performing the cap city analyses and recommendations. TRAFFIC FLOW ANALYSIS in order to obtain updated trafficrvolume data and perform the traffic flow ana manual turn in.. 1 Ys � s a 9 Gov ®men counts war® performed at several intaesections in the study area. manual counts were made ys from 7 : 00 AM to 6:30 AM 6:00 1� m. t on udeekda,y and � � �0 p� to g. �. � ata, was recorded 7,11 15 minUte minute i t and summarize or vc 1 ume and peak hour determ i nat i can . General l y the Am peak (cca a r'ad from 1ti • 6: M1 AM to 3 :00 AM and the PM peak occurred fro 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The intersections oc unted included Pacific Highway 99 at Walnut and at !u l 1 Mountain Road and Bull Mouhta i n Road at SW 139th Avenue. Beef Send Road at Scho i l s Ferry Road was also counted Previous studies provided 1990 count data on 135th AwereUe� at 3cho 11 s Perry Road and Walnut. Southwest 121st Avenue at Walnut was also previously counted. Traffic flow maps were (rounded peak hour prepared to the nearest five vehicles) cdhditions owing the traf"ic count data and turn moyementy, Plow distribution for the site traffic was proportioned as approximately 25% to /from for the generated the north, 27% to /from the east, 11% to /from the south, and the remaining 37% within the imfed i ate zoho as defined by Metro's 1980 census tracts The trip distribution data based orb year 2005 project i ahs was furnished by Washington county. Exist i ng traffic ccunt data was also considered in astt i gn i ng e traffic Plows. The following flow maps (Figures No 1 through Na :' 8 ) depict the vairiou ;sa comr, onents used in combi l ing the total site traffic scenarios for AM and PM peek hour conditions. Total site traffic was then evaluat ed in terms of intersections Capacity turn lane requirements, and traffic ` c oh x^010 Plow maps were prepared for several categories. Existing " °aff ic. (Pi'gures Rio: 1 and 2 d 3 i to Generated Tr~aff i s (F' i lures No 3 I n- Process T'raf f i s (Figures No , ry and G i tin and ite Traffic `ig«res Vo .a. an std 8 ) ��i Pe t _Hour se 110 1111 NM 'ur o� .ds ng : raf PM Peak -Rolm_ al ,SW 135th AVE. Do VI 1-4• IJ. NJ CD a' .0 d l aw D 0 o tat c 11 rt U 'Figure No, Site Generated 'Txat :ic PM Peak Hour H "J i. g 41, I1 Ai 061 0t ad o 0 N a u, i +� 1 PV 0 0 to• 0 N ti ICA 0 F4 Ad CU .4*9 ,(IL1 ti) sei DC 21 tr11 ricg M • SW 139 AVE. tti cn rt r• i in 0 o O Re • 1f m n in ►erf aormi ng the capacity analyses, i n process traffic (Figures No. 5 & 6) was added to existing and site traffic (Figures No. 7 & 8' to determine the total tr-aff ic impacts. Vehicular trip generation rates from the 1 987 1 . T b E a Tr 1!p Generation Manual were applied in Oorforming the are The following d�1u�s were ,a pp lied in assigning the peak hour (AM & PM) generated traffic. A total of 4510 trip (Inds will occur over a 4 hour weekday,period. Approximately 50% will be entering trips and 50% will be departing trips each weekday. , A� ��a1z �I.ous� 't'r' ► s Land Use Enter Exit �.. . 486 SF Homes 90 250 340 tr 3 180 480 `the r°egre + n equat ions pub l i shed i n the i 88` 1 . ' o'! hour trip as dove l opments PAR 2 R I„s �Rsa Capacity analyses for several inter^section conditions at the critical locations were perf ormed to determine sthe levels of service for the AM and PM peak hours. The intersections ovate analyzed for ,existing, existing wsth site tr and total site C ,� r ,y • af�€7c, (in process, year 2005) conditions. A computer program for non'4 signalized intersections ors based on the latest Highway gh • way.` Capacity Manual ( 19s5) and vehicular delay method was used . 11 pr. i ntouts " are attached i n the appendix. Listed below are the summaries for the level sere i ce (L.O.S.) conditiona calculated. All values a1 yes ar•e. peak hour pac i f ic iM hg y A►t aa 1 nut Street cad i t i on Ana l v'zd L x Asting Traffic APB: E (D)* Existing Tr v,ff ic. PM Existing & Site Traffic AM E (D)* Existing & Site Traffic PM E Pa if is iichwav`At aull MT. Road Existing Traffic AM E Existing T `affic PM existing & Site traffic AM 0 Ex i st i n-9 & Site Traffic Pty Total Traffic & In-Process AM Total Traffic & In-Process PM esw 13gth 4v0DMe.. ,t Err.1 1 I. PcAr Exist'1 `�'c�g & Site te Traiffic AM Existing & site Traffic PM g Total TrtIf f i c& In -Prcdess Am Total Traffic & In -Irocess Pig e ,+ S "D with dua 1 east Qund tc ncr°thbo hd permattecle eft, t rn Yi Beef Send d. At Schol is Perr:v .Rd. Existing Traffic AM Existing Traffic PM Eitistirg _& Site Traffic AM Existing & Site Traffic PM SW _1 3th Avenue At Scho 1 s Perk. Rd Existing Traffic AM Existing Traffic PM Existing & Site Traffic AM Existing & Sit0 Traffic PM D SW 13 h .Avenue. twa nut St,�, Existing & Site Traffic AM Existing z Site Traffic PM jj , 12 ri st Avenue At Walnut : Stre Existing ' Traffic AM & PM Existing & Site Traffic AM & PM °® Total Traffic & In- Process AM & PM C -D Seve6 ° a 1 comments shnu l d be noted concer, n i rig th 1 capacity ana l vs i s The. aria , l ys i s indicates that •even tho;i gh - there are .., . �4 ..cans 9 these as . , curr�ottl sanne Le�.S. � car�d�ti n.dit�c�o�s w i r hat than ,� with the site generated traf "� 1 c At Pa�:ri :'ic H`igh the ihtersed- an r . �.a`io ei:'de .• . peek dour t 7 . � 11 c�perattwo�eastbound� 1 anes��o f unct i �+n a� a by allowing the dual 1 eft turf': The second lane will a l sa ha ve to allow through and right, turn traffic. �►t $u 1 l Mount ' tarn Road end Pacific �igh�av� the Y t'E�e f uture southbound r iht aria l s � s cans i der�d turn lane to be I n p l ace . This will serve as a the th rd southbe and lane added r 1990 At SW 136th Avenue and Scho 1 l s Ferry Road , the future traffic signal and five laha condition (an Schell s Ferry) Were considered in place. The project.. - i s scheru l ed for 1991, SW 121st ,Avenue at Walnut Street le a four-way stop t was analyzed hY applying Table 10-7 from the Highway Capaoi ty Manual. It will operate at L.O.S. "C' to "D" under all conditions. levels ranging form no veh cu l ate delay t , $ome or average peak hour'; delays. Level "Dom will resu I t in longer delays but is acceptable for peak condition . Level "E" represents very long delays and should be avoided or minimized if possible. From a capacity and L . 0 ; S . standpoint, the intersections studied will not experience mayor level cif service changes pr ov l d i ng the improvG:ndni".s identified above are implementeda T F I 0 SIGNAL WARRANXS Traffic signal warrants as prescribed in the Manual On Uniform ... were determi nee; for the urns i gna l led r�f f � c Control Devices wer interAsec ons of SW 13eth Avenue at Bull Mountain Road and SW 135th Avenue at Walnut Street The Peak our war► an {,� (No. . 1 ) was determined for both the AM and PM peak hours (present, with site 6 ._ . .. gna l Warrant traffic and Year 2G1Q� � • and found �o rot meek s 7 condl t i ons The case For tots-than. 10 , 000 popu l aat i tan and speed over° A A rn1 i 1 es pcv hour was app'd i ed '`heref ar e , s gr a 1 s should not be s thee conditions are oo� ;� reed cQk�s i der�d . the �l�arr�,c�fi: curved fs�r n the appenJ ro 4 The i itersect i' on of" sel�o l s Ferry Road and 3w Beef Bend Road pi esen t 1 y i s . a st ►p contr+o 11 ed intersection with a stop sign on Beef Bern Road Due - ex i st i p4 Peak hoUr and PM) it meets the peak hour traffic signal warrant I discussions with o.D. . Y . it has be ©n ' acknow R ;edged that the inter- section i s in need of improvements including possible s i gna 1 i z at i on e However, due to other pr i or i t i zad projects the schedule to construct any ,improvements at this location t ion is indefinite. TRAFF I +G LANE g.a I IB , MIE !'i'"'y Bull Mountain Road will adequately f unr r i on from a traffic safety and capacity standpoint with the existing street configuration. However, at the intersection with the new site access, separate turn la. es wi 1 1 be required. For the eastbound to northbound left mo vement, a median lane with 75 feet storage Qrage w be required to handle the total traffic (with in -oroce 'SS tra.1 f f +l conditions. There will a l so be a westbound right turn lane and school bus stop (west side of intersect i cry) on Bull Mountai r Road. The new souInco SW 139th Avenue will require one w 6 � cued approach at � i� inbound (northbound) lane and two outbound (southbound) lanes, These lanes should d be marked for s� These or a distance .� Dance of 1 g0 feet to separate left and right turns to Bull Mountain Road On the north side of the 'deve l opmer t, traffic will access the eX i st i ng street systef along SW 135th Ave Ue south of Walnut Street. The new street connec t an needs to br two lanes wide with one inbound and one outbound V eh,a. Other 1 a�e im rovemen is 'aod .recomnnendat i ons viertie ldent�f�+�d the c tpacitY ahalysis section N O • K ULIOAR N R R MM IONS From a traffic eng i neer ng stndpo i nt the development can adequately function based on the data analyzed. There should be no adverse impacts to Bull Mountain Road, SW 135th Avenue, Walnut Street) or other vicinity streets if the recommendations prroposod i n lemented. this ....report are adopted and imp � Based on the projected traffic volumes, and Year traffic OPJS 0 Bull Mountain Road at SW 139 s 1r Avenue W i l l exper ienc+e L.O.S. „6" conditions in the peak hours under the existing n ' ©� ' g anc� site traffic conditions, No signal warrants are met. It is recommended that the , new site access provide for separate left and right turn lanes (southbound) southbound ) lleaving the site and a ... northbound left turn one inbound (northbound) � 1 ane . An, eastbound to no lahe (storage length of 75 feet) and westbound to northbound right turn l ane i i 11 also bey! necessAry on 8u l l Mountain Road at the new site access. Southwest 1 35th Avenue, at•• i;Val nut : °�trei:t will •operate• at eery i ce level uno4r • the eX1st1n',� plus site cond'i 47ons. The 0n1y rcommendatiG:. to improve this int.arseotion is to widen the existin J • turning red . `� o t e southeast corner to about 30 feet. Considering to antioipated trofi; is • a 1 �,c�ea► a�:�s�c °i ated With the b operAati seal end safety developnne�ot it Is �3ssential frca a traff �c star dpo i nt, that certain improiiements be ' nnadc The f�loWin9 e4 m nts she l d t l eo be undertaken i n c00 unct ion vii th the eve owment, r o Maintenance of the a °", st i ng and adequate sight distance along all existing and proposed streets and the Project site frontages is essential. o struct i can by landscaping, Parking, buildings, or other objects would be Onsaf6 a it will be necessary to implement standard traf f i u control devices, including pavement markings ngs and signing � as, per County standards and the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices. o twc parkin v should be allowed along u 1' l,; Mountain Road, SW 135th Avenue, or along the new site* street approaches near these intersections. Capacity Analysis Work &',meets a ,T,E. Land Use Codes Peak Hour S 7 gna l Warrant Curves 1935 HCM + SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ***c**` INTERSECTION . .Walnut St A/ Pacific HwY A 99 AREA TYPE ... M OTHEI ANALYST....... RC DATE... A A..M r M'A A5-17 -90 TIME.. A A. A M . A A . AM Peak Hour COMMENT .. A A . .E ristin0 Conditions GEOMETRY WB NB LT 12.0 L 12.0 L R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 2. 0 .Y.N...w w......rr ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE NV AD3 PKG BUSES PHF PEDS % (%) YIN Nm Nb LB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 NB 0.00 2.00 N SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 .wrri.s/ wr. wr«wwwwr„w w.+„ „rwer.r„ ar i.r wr we. .. `'a w, NB EB LT a LT TH TH iC RT RT X _P�9 PD � S WB LT B LT `1"H X TH RT x RT PO X PD GREEN 9.0 0 A 0 0,0 GREEN 0 0'_ 0.0 YELLOW 4,0 0.0 0 A 0 YELLOW 0.0 W r V • ...obwaiCwM .ar ad ' rnrl w..Y www.... -..r N+r..r.w�wY,1. -..wow _ -r.r.r _-..i..ww.wr.r4r.Nr..w....ar LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE , G/C DELAY LOS APP r DELA` APP . LOS [� 50.9 L. 0.857. 0.248 50. i 5.5 E lJ 06 0.248 Q 8 ��y) n',' i. TR �.30ti! �W p V "' .a WE3 LT n 1/8 . 69 .41 .2 E ® I I i W� M R 0.049 0.069 40.7 E w.F NB L 0.803 0.110 62,5 F IR 1.066 0.490 6,6$ 3B L 0,,059 0.11.0 4t., E' TR - . - 6- 16.6 C ....wr..d .w--wu --- -- r--- ;..- ---r uW aw w rww.. e.ar r.wr ww. .. - - -- w.....- w.,..- -.wM+ .....w.www4....,...ad- ,.. INTER SECTION t Delay r 45.6 ( ec /veh) V/C : 0.912 LOS r- PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE YIN min `f 20.5 3 Y 20-5 3 Y 14.5 3 Y 14.5 3 ,. �:rrw;...r rwatr..r •a+w:s ....ar rw.rrm.r rr .. rr .a. CYCLE LENGTH = 145.0 PH -1 PH-2 PH -3 PH-4 X 35.0 /.0 15.0: 4.0 4.r ..f.140*..rl _ wr.wwn.4.i Wiiw.►w.....um Bair Cap s i ty Anallesis Worksheets oTaE. Land Use Codes Peak Hour Signal Warrant Curves 1985 HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ** *****% :Ic. ****** ** cXc** *** * ** ** K **** c** ** * *** **** *** ** * *fir * * **** ******* INTERSECTION..Walnut St./Pacific HwY +, 99 ApR,EA .TYPE . . . . r O1 9� HE ANALYS 0 . . . . . :� FRC DATE- ...e.••..5 -17-90 TIME ••ua. r r . . . N .AM Peak Hour COMMENT----... Existing Traffic With Du al Left T r n ES to NB VOLUMES • GEOMETRY EB we NB SB ES WB NB SSB LT 325 10 135 10 N L 12.0 LT 12.0 L 1.2.0 L 12.0 TH 10 10 1595 635 LTR 12.0' R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT ` 120 10 5 30 r 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 25 5 15 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 sr.rrr. w.�d l.w we'r eee yeire.��rrrd ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE NV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PELTS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (n) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T ES 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20 5 0 We .00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 20.5 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 _ 0.90 10 V 14.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90. 10 Y 14.5 3 Irwww .hWMid Vn+1wwr I+s wr ww'1Y94 wrtri '/SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 145.0 PH-1 PH -2 PH -3 PH -4 PH -1 PH-2 PH -3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT PD X PD X W8 LT X se LT TH X T!' RT X RT PD x PD ?( GREEN 30.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 17.0 73.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4O 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 wwwrr �w4nii w.+r ee.r..r.�ri 4,e.. er, Mr e.. .. LEVEL VEL Off" SERVICE LANE GRP. V� /! C G/C /j DELAY LOS APP. �yDELAY APP. ��yLOS EB L.p+p 0.649 0.214 42 .4 �.�4. : 40 . V 'b LTR 0.701 0.214 37.7 D WB LT 0.185 0.069 41.2 E 41.1 E R 0.049 0.069 40.7 E NI3 L 0.714 0.124 53.7 E 42.9 TR 1.023 0.10 42.1 SB L 0,053 0 W 1.24 42.5 E 14.€3 CR 0.418 0.510 14.4 INTERSECTION: Delay �'y = 35.9 ( edc/~rh ) ee.r..ae -wiles - a-- ed.i'u--- www..e w. wei�w4iY +ee.r..i.e.ue1rJ.es.�wee► V/t = 0,843 LOS of L u ,...... 1985 HCM • SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT �wyt� �/y��y� y �y� y : Ic% �C: �C*�t�c�C*�CZ��Cic*�Vc*�c�ka$ c*. �= k�C*� }Cak�9c;,�;�k�c%�***�c�c**�c INTERSECTION..Walnut St. /Pac.ifis Hwy. 99 AREA TYPEr.bw.OTHER ANALYSTwa.....PRC j DATE.. M s w� a w K s. 5-17 -90 TIME... a a e ....AM Peak Hour COMMENT.... a ..EXistin0 and Site Traffic with Dual Left Turn EB to NO r.... oe:. «.,.. ,.w aW «,..w...:,. W. a.. «rr bow b. b.w...;,r e... Mw ba.o. rn bw o... aw wr r w s►...,wr w `w.. Me bo. ur.r .ew..r «. VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SO EB WB Na SB LT 360 10 135 30 u L 12.0 L T ° 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 �, TN 10 10 1695 665 • LTR 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 130 10 5 30 • 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 25 5 5 15 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 .. 12.0 12.0 /y 12.0 12.0 /2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HIV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED . BUT. ARR. TYPE ( %) (%) YIN Nm Nb Y/N min `f EB (i p 00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 V 20.5 3 SOB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 14.5 SS 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0'.90 10 V 14.5 '1S.I NAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 152.0 PH -1 PH-2 PH-3 PSI! -4 PH °1 PH-2 PH -3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH TH ro RT X RT X PD X PD X WO LT X SB LT TH X TH x RT i RT X PD X PD X GREEN j 29{ .0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 17.0 81 a 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 .0 0.0 0 0 44 ... .. _ . ii.r .r wr w iid ir.:wi * mor m Mr m W bd iieor 4iY owi ∎ 1sV . 011 hii .1r_ ri mi �rw LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP . V/C G/0 DELAY Los APP. DELAY APP • LOS EB L 0.658 0.197 46.0 E 55.9 E LTR 0.956 0.197 63.0 F WB LT 0.194 0.066 43.5 E 43.4 R 0.0w^ 2 0.06 43.0 E . .. NB L 0.748 0.118 539 E 44.0 TR 1.029 0.539 42.9 E SB L 0.414 0.166 0.118 45.3 E 14.8 TR Y R 0.539 1.'4.5 B " . INT RSECT ON Delay = 38.9 (sec /veh) V/0 = ,.0.917 LOS 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************* INTERSECTION. .Walnut St./Pacific Hwy. 99 ARriA TYPE .....OTHER ANALYST.......FRC DATE..........5 -17 -90 TIME..... ...,.PM Peak Hour COMMENT.......Existing Traffic Conditions VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WS NB SB EB WE N8 SB LT 130 10 200 10 L 12.0 LT 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 15 10 1195 1620 TR 12.0 R T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 255 10 10 200 : 12.0 ' 12.0 TR 12,0 TR 12.0 RR BO 10 5 60 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 wavow.momOwls' ,Wwmormevorma .... oeiwwwwwwwomtwuiemoowwes 0103USTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T ES 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20.5 3 WS 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 V 20.5 3 N8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 14.5 3 SB 0.00 '2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 V 14.5 3 ''SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 155.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH -4 PH-1 PH-2 :,,..'3 PH-4 58 LT ^ ... NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X W8 LT X se, LT TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 29.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 17.0 84.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 ...... Wi■itme,mmoomfriwoorwomeowilbow.witmomvmmewwrkii. LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. Vic G/c DELAY LOS APO. DELAY APP, L05 EB L 0.441 0.194 42,,5 8 4.4 E TR 0.713 0.194 42.3 E WB 0.198 0.065 44.5 E 44.5 5 R 0.001 0.065 43.8 L 1.130 0.116 154.8 F 36.4 0 TR 0.716 0.648 17.6 C SB L 0.057 0.116 46.3 E 53.9 TR 1.063 0.54e 53.9 E INTERSECTION: OetaY = 45.8 (sec/Veh) V/C = 0.9313 LOS = E 1985 HCM w SIGNAL /ZED INTERSECTIONS UMMARY REPORT � w,,� * q. * * t * *! ,A, y `* * �.l w� * 1 * y `` y * U _N,,1� y,� * ,,�,, * * y Ley e. � * * * * * * * * * * * �i•�+�T'✓(��°�`�v �L �."�.`'��`eaC n+ �it��. +t•%TM�%�i'l+r��ilti%i�✓t�H�.��h �' F�,+' S% p� %fhM�`+T��+lr%�i:4��%h��7��T �W +q�!�': rH`+'T �NN'�5+�+%w�T"�i ✓'f��"+f+ +i•3 `t !� INTERSECTION..lea1nut St./Pacific Hwy. 99 AREA TYPE « ... OTHEl A} 1 oALYST r e « « h . 0PRC wJy d . . « r . . « . 1�� .PM Pea a. Hour COMMEN T ,.. r «, E��ln S aioA� Site Traffic - .wrr.,r rr+«r r . .°w wdwr�, w - ---_---_ -s- e-- -- Wa-wwr rwwwwYrwdH VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NO SB EB WB NB SB LT 170 10 200 10 L 12.0 LT 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 15 10 1250 1720 TR 12.0 A 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 AT 255 10 10 250 , . 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 100 10 5 $0 12.0 12.0 E 12.0 12,0 `y 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 '" 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 ".yrrir4f_iw -_.... wrar-M.. i. rrrwwlrwr-----___r rr. ew.-_w arre.- _w rl+_ \wrwi+>-_laWMrr~r-i.rwr__ wa err rrsi.ctiwrwrbw-rrw+. -w --- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PING BUSES PHE PEDS PED W BUT. . ARR . TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0:00 2,00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20,5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 14.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 14.5. ^.G.biw -- ---- awe- - --rsr L.ri.wr.wrr+' -r.r bw.-it -- -nel ---Y - .' SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 161.0 PH-1 PH -2 PH 3 PH-4 PH -1 PH -2 PH-3 PH -4 EB LT X NB LT, X TH • TH x T RT FA X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT TH X TH X AT X RT X PCB X PD x GREEN 24.0 9.0 0 r 0 0.0 GREEN 19.0 93.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 aiwwr"i_....- Orrrwrq -M+krr LEVEL OF' SERVICE LANE GRP V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L /ry. .1 55.3 5 53.7 E TR 0.795 0-155 52.0 E WB LT 0.206 0.062 46.5 E 46.5 E R 0.001 0 . 062 45.7 E NB L 1.057 0. 124 120.8 F 29.8 D TR 0.703 0.584 15.9 C " 58 L � :05o 0.124 �� r E 56.8 TR 1.075 0.584 56.9 B INTERSECTION: ,%clay = 45.9 (sec /Vary) V ,14° 1985 1985 HCM SIGNAL Z D TNTERSECTXONa SUMMARY REPORT :k * k:lG;k **** w**** * **** c** **'*rk:' *** *** **sic c* t:K*** ** C'**':Q * * **:Ott:k s*>ls :sly****' s>ic******** INTERSECT IO N . .8U11 Mountain Rd„/Pacific Hwy. 99 AREA T YPE .. w s .O HE\ ANALYST.•....r~RC DATE. .. . .. . . . 5-17 -90 TIME.,, e . . r . ., AM Peak Hour COMMENT .......Existing Traffic With Future SB Right Turn Lane err -- r-- rrrrn -- ter -rsrr WB 12.0, 12.0 12.0 11.0 112«0 12.0 GEOMETRY Nils SB LT L 12.0 T 12.0 R T 12.0 T 1 2 r 0 T 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 �/ 1 2. �/0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __---- _r_r__rr- rr- --r- tit_- -- r-- _ri__W ---rr- -tiler rw rw wi+ir. Yrn Yet wri awrrf.iter . -Y-s ftliown.wwwolyoumftvlo Me M'ar r'YMN Ml r a: woo *Ye iM r ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PKG BUSES PHP PITS Nm NMI O 0 0.90 10 O 0 0.90 10 O 0 pp0.90 X, 1 p0 0 O 0 ..n 70 10 em Yeu �crrYor Mr w...r ew YR'..dr.r Yr1 fri ar 1ie w ire it wi itrww r.. w. r-- Ylni-- w eri_arm_err.c._f . r er- - fir.- rwWr-- .ww---- rYa+1- `.r�i.w Yrlho w..r ri NE LT TH X RT x PD 58 LT TH X RT PD X 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15,0 40,0 0.q 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 Ywd wwr rfr �rfY Uefr•+ie eir u,i..r.iair wr wi.- rd ufi -ilr, -tit real w. w.i.r . r r rrl irr Yet lire urw r w'a rir iir r ad �r iar r eroi wt+ hri mf Yin r M.s on r frd mii wai r aM Yrd rr1 r w. r ii .�+ Yli+ fin LANE GRP. V /C ii L�r -� 0.5,02 LR 05 56 02 f. 0,166 T 0.614 T 0.543 R 0,187 LEVEL Cr SERVICE 0/C DELAY LOS 0.267 22.0 0.267 19 . 6 te. 0.178 23.8 t 0.667 5.8 B 0.456 ( . 11.7 0.456 B .456 8 ..` ..:. irr 1r.1 ri YW f.i err Ntii rei r ai: r re 4r .r..`r i+i rinl irr rri Ywi r H.+ wi.1r. 4ei Ar fii ve.i r ri r.: iii iro w wo erUiui r r.i fri rri .1 Mo rr.. Ire i.i � l �J�lay 10.6 c sec /veh) V/C r~ 0.600 LOS MI* .rnl gird e:r, it;. ieir 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT 'is *'°' *SD:** * ** **** k** ** s ***** ** * *** k>k*** * ** * * *******5k.`9c **** aka ** :*:k=k •*=k*'!k * *** ** INTERSECTION. Bull Mountain Rd./Pacific Hwy, 99 AREA 1 YPE ■ e . . .O Y (HER ANAL T yi S f . P. w■ P q f- Rev DATE--........5 ©- 17-y9, 0 Hour q dl ■ '■ ■ ■ b. M P ■ F. M Peak Hour COMMENT. ■ . ..Exietina With Site Traffic and Future SE Right Turn Lane ixw o...bwA.w•rra.i..ra aw �r w.kw.c.i wv h..l.rr orr.Y�M•.s... wsx mr'u.r..w�.Y..wwr w�.wex.r.q ww**wUx:Ir .+.* rur�iw:a -,.-as Yi�w �Yrr wr M"w.r+.**ewl ****wr**Wmes* VOLUMES �� WE N� �� FB �� GEOMETRY .. NB SB LT 440 0 SS 0 L 12.0 L T 12.0 1L 12,0 T 12.0 ` H 0 0 1250 765 LA 12.0 P 12.J T 12.0 T 12.0 A11 /.1� 0 ,11 ., w 0 12.0. 1 �T - -..110 .. 0 '� -.' 0 ,b "'P "�d' r �JI.� ■® � \� rO/ .... � �j r� � � � d: 2 .0 -,. RR 20 0 0 25 r 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 "12.0 12.0 . . 12.0 12 r0 12. ■0 12.0 12.0 w+ w N. wr wv..w wnr w. ♦.u.+.. or - arc r .Tie w. Mw w. w..wi i6s. wN lq/ wd ww ar v. wr ..r. two ww 6mri. ow wi h+ Wr ww - W wr ..i .,uu ww * * ww w w Mur wr wd wr � 4 i. ww W * mrsh * * ur wu * is ADJUSTMENT FACTORS �" OS PFD � HV F�D.,r PKG BUSES PHF P�� BUT. °.rpE .BUT ARP.. T © /( ) , /�',pp,l�yy Y/N Nan Nb /� q Y/N min T EB 0.00 �:?...00 N 0 0 0r!0 10 Y 20.5 3 WB 0.00 '.,.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20.5 3 NB 0.0C 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 8.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 8-5 3 w.... .. _.. ix.„...... .r- lielaww.f .y..yd .ur bn x..rW b..r.ur ww ai wr_ i.sxe,,M - SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 F� 1 PCB 2 PH -3 PH- 4 PH- I PH -2 ' PH-3 PN,.., �, r� a w . ... P EB LT X NB LT TH TH X RT x PT Pb PCBs WE LT SB LT T TH RT 1RT x Pry GREEN 23 ., 0 0.0 0 . t? 0 . -� 15.�5 40.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 GREEN YELLOW 4.0 i.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0, 0.0 0 r,0 ** Tier A two wwY '.. '• LEVEL Or SERVICE LANE CRP. V/C G/0 DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.650 0.267 24.5 C 23 .9 C LR 0.729 0.267 23.2 C NE L 0.203 0.178 24.0 C 6.5 T 0.614 0.667 5.8 B SB T 0.650 n0.456 j ( 1 B 7` 11.8 � 11. B R 0.186 0 ■456 �xr r 4 {:� r ww+..x.r1:. +..{1i:r .. rnr .a.�►'�W lax.' .. ,. x "'ww lx.rw+xs rs �uir+rWiwd a:.iN wst iur Wii6d iiai.'nr lies INTERSECTION Delay = 11.7 (sec'veh) V/C A 0.647 LOS - B 1e,465 H';4: c Ir4NALIZED INTERSECTIONS 8uMMAkY REPORT IN ERyECTICN. .8U11 Mountain Rd . a Pac y1(✓ Hwy. 9 AREA TYPE.. ..0'THER ANALYST „ . . u . FRC DATE. .. ..h5 1 '! -90 1 IM . ..... . . . .AM Peak HOur COMMENT.... ..Total Traffic (Includes In Process Traflit) VOLUMES a GEOMETRY EB WB N8 SB EB WB N8 SB LT 685 0 75 ; 0 - L 12.0 L.T 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0. TH 0 0 1250 765 a LR 12.0 k 12.0 T 12.0 T '12.0 RT 175 0 0 195 a 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 A 40 0 0 40 . 12 d0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 .....1Mw W.r i+,,,,„,,,,,y1quwJr +. ...4 4+wrrwi..„... ww..„...errirlrw, YowrwrYww Y........”.+w..iMrwiaw .w...ib mmir.00”..r ni+vnwir.“ “ro wu...owY4 wwo.... ...sw.+ ADJUSTMENT 1= ACTORS GRADE HV AD3 PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED . BUT ARP . T PE ( %) ( %) Y/N NM Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00, 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20. 3 0.90 10 20.5 8 2.00 N 0 0 1,1B 0 0� (/�� [q7 SB Y O ®1O �.�a V M�V �: 10 Y � 8-5 NB 01,00 2.00 N 0 0 N 0 0 w.war....r......r uwwwr u. Y....! r... s... ba. sh!.... v, ir.. ww.. wa te ......aw.ur.w.w....w..wWM.s..rw /rs w..........ii ... v4 ... w..wi.w - s- ..ss........... "r ..w,.... ws +ur ....r...;. iUi ,SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 400.0' PH -1 PH-2 PH -3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X Ne. LT X TH TH X RT 1 RT P D PD X W8 LT $8 LT TH TH RT RT PD P0 X N 33 GREEN 0 �w 33.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4:.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 ,- .. s....- ..+.w.....s..r+....r..ir.►3tw:f w...r....a.. sir. ...w.....i.;�wd...L..w.w..s.s.w rw 4rl ..r... iuJ....i.r .ii..n..tsi. LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.793 0.340 27.9 0 28.7 D LR 0.880 0.340 29.6 0 NB L 0.308 0.160 28.4 D 10.43 8 T 0.682 0.600 0 a .�13 r 0.410 15.5 C 15.3' T 0.611 R 0.280 0.410 12.8 B INTERSECTION: Delay i .8` (tecidvoh) V/C Ir..is.is.es iwFS�..s.r.. i!MI w. ir�l yp r...s il.i ,. _ K _ 198t7i HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSEC1ION SUMMARY REPORT ****** ** ** * *** c #*** *** ** *** **** * * * *:4 * ******>°I' c*�ft*'* ***` 4*** * *** ** c **> * ** INTERSECTION . . Bu 11 Mountain Rd . /Pac i f I c Hwy . 9 AR SA TYPE .0 HEy ANALYST . » FRC � DATE �ATE�. w e.» w.w00-17-90 TIMEraada.rA'..PM Peak Hour COMMENT. r w . E9<istin0 Traffic Conditions w..wi..ear wr hr whirr Jm,»r1lwYww�lo.r ww.liw .I!iueiYYa��r•. h.+�`w MrwMw .ww. rb wil iiiir ..r ww Y',A wI, M.44w Ye, t..« •awn bn. V.r or s+mb wr wM+. VOLUMES, GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WE NB S LT 170 0 130 0 L 12 »0 1; T 12•,,.8 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 0 0 1100 1670 LR 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 1.2,.0 RT 95 0 0 180 . 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 RR 40 0 0 40 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12 . 12.0 1 2. 0 a 12 »0 12.0 12.0 12.0 wr wwr Mar ..r hr .w .n. wr .r. ww u.i w+ w� r ....r. r wrr.:r caW a.M w.. wr r.. w .. . tw rr.w w.. rY ..r .w err .r. +..r ‘W hY oar. .ni w......r h. on. Yw1 r...n. w ww wr .nn w.. w w w...r. ,. wr.....r ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE -IV AD3 PKG BUSES PHF PED S PED BUT . ARR . TYPE EB (n%) 0.00 (% )/ YIN Nm Nk/� 1 f YIN m i n T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20.5 . 3 W8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1,,0 Y 8.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0'.90 10 Y 0.5 3 ....1. -- gdr.r w....�r r.. iw hi. «w r.r 1k.i .w wN M.i .w o• i...i wr wf . ' *)SIGNAL SETTINGS PH--3 PH-4 NB` LT TH RT PD 58 LT TH RT PD 0.0 /0.0 GREEN jE p 0.0 0 .0 YELLOW Int LANE GRP. V/C 6/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. EE L 0.283 0.236 26.2 0 24.5 LR. 0481 0.236 23.1 C PPPP ." 0 . « �. 8 43.6 E 8.7 NE L Y %�� A �. T 0.508 0.709 4.8 A 4, �� SB T �Ay 0.970 0.564] 23.6 �C} 22-5 a. `'. ;f. P 0.1.84 0..564 7.6 M7 .. .. ww ,4 aW Y.'. ;r o hn..rs - - we. in..r 'owe. - Lr ri imoi J .fr ira.r. wy wi rr. w. r:1 +rr w.i w.. wr rrr mal ww r.r MeaS ar:.»! r.r w i w.r ix* giw mei 4..w wr.ir w sln ww..141. w. r. 1610 oft. am w.. INTERSECTION . ,Delay = 17.6' ( sec /Veh) Vie = 0.786 LOS, i.a,,ii �4r •� 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION. .Bull MoUnta;in Rd./Pacific Hwy. 99 AREA TYPE OTHER ANALST.......FRC DATE....,.....5 -17 -50 TIME..1.4 ...PM4Peak Hour COMMENT Existing With Site Traffic and Future SB Right Turn Lane . . .. VOLUMES : GEOMETPy EB We NB SB 3 EB wB. NB SB 225 0 170 0 L 12.0 LT 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 0 0 1100 1670 LR 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 115 0 0 2e0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 P 12.0 50 0 0 60 12.0 12„0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------- ----------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV AD3 PKG BUSS PHF PEDS PED. BUT, ARR.. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm NL y/N min T EB 0.00 ;',..00 N 0 0 0.50 10 V 20.5 3 W8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 y 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 V 8.5 3 S6 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0'.90 10 Y 8.0 3 -,14;IONAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 115.0 PH -i PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT PD ^ PD X X WB LT SB LT TH TH X AT AT x PD pp X GREEN 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 17.0 61.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 '4).0 0.0 0,0 YELLOW 4.0 4,0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DEAY LOS APP, DELAY App. LOS EB L 0.392 0.226 29.1 D 27-4 LR 0.499 0.226 25.9 0 NB L 0.713 0.157 40.9 E 9.3 T 0.499 01722 4.6 A SB T 1.014 0.539 33.6 0 31.0 R 0,301 0.539 9.5 B lo,or .00 110 .1., 1.1 INTERSECTION Delay = 22.8 (eo/yoh) V/C 0.837 LOS C r.; 1985 HCM» SIGNALIZED, INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT C**** * * ** $C ** **%* ***** ** * * * * * ** * ***7krc*'+C** * * *' * C****'1+ *%i *** *),..** G** ** *** INTER 'SEC T I ON .. BU 1 l hau a tw i n Rd./Pacific HwY . 99 AREA TYPE ... .OTHER AN ( AL S 9 . . . . n e . d 4 'R p DATE . . . . a . . w o M 51j x17 -90 TIME.... m .....PIS Peak Hour COMMENT.. » .... Total Traffic (Includes In P'roccsS Traffic) ... .e,.l a.grw:asl4+r..rwry wi/M..wu wi, .rr 4vr ..+..r w.r �rlww.+sG 1r+ ... ti..m 11w+ +we. urr r a w w111w ao a7a ww Tv. m.w Yanlww Lr wl ar /is Yw war w..�Mw•1•+wr ati rey ww ar w. VOLUMES = �WaEOMETRY . ES WB NB SB Eli3 WE NB St; LT 325 0 280 0 L 12.0 IT 1.2.0 12.0 T 12.0 TH 0 0 1100 1670 . LR 12,0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 175 0 0 430 1.2.0 12.0 T 12.0 ! 12.0 RR 60 0 0 90 12.0 12,0 12 . 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 w�►lwmwliii, wur �ea.YiM Y « rwnwaswrrar. +r..nrr+wwurrwi--waw4l. +--- ...wrier-- ,- WW --lw) .` rrro riLwaw-. riwwarsrwwa r-wG.rr.w-- -Leun+/.ww..i: - ADJUSTMENT P ACTORS GRADE HV ADS' BUSES PSI PING BU F PECKS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE PKG ' Y/'N Nm Nb YIN min T � �) (%) 0 0.90 0.00 2.00 0 0 N 0 0.90 10 V 20.5 3 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20.5 3 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 V 8.5 3 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0%90 10 Y 8.5 1 '1111- -- M- ----_- Yid___--- -.1.-i -- c... sfO_ IWW--, -. es.-._. isw1111/ 1. 1_ _- _Mgl.+.unl-_wwwwa..m- -tl... wo.. ..._ -..1 bYrY..... CYCLE L ,SIGNAL. SETTINGS C LENGTH tt 117.0 PH'-1 PH 2 PH-3 Phi -4 PH -1 PH -2 PH -3 PH-4 ES LT X NE LT X TH TH X X RT ,x RT PD X PO X We LT S8 LT IH TH X RT RT )< PD PD X GREEN 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 22.0 58.0 0' . 0 0.0 YELL OW 4.0 0.0 0.0 . -- . ® _ . YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 ww«ww-crw- _ --.-- --Mw--- r s r r w. rww- rw Www.b nr w4rnwm.W.d b r rwrk SERVICE VIC C/C LEVEL R DELAY LOS APP. DELAY OP a LOS 58 LANE G iro n 0.676 76 0.222 32.4 D 34.2 D LR 0.804 0.222 58.8 E 15.1 NB L 0.935 0.197 0 T 0.496 0.726 4.5 A S8 T 1,084 0.504 57.4 E 50. R 0.497 0.504 12.8 r wr w wi.W -w ni n r i. r .w r ww r. w . a r . . W , w rw ^ .. 1 n J IfTBRSEC1IJN' Delay M 35.8 8ec 1V � ) V/0 0 9 85 L 1965 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMr =,RY REPORT INTERSECTION . .S■ chol is Ferry Rd./SW 135th AREA TYPE w . n . .OTHER ANALYST ". w w . ... FRC, DATE w w . . w -17 90 TIME wd a r ww raar . .■ aa nr rw • Lw w .Y M Peak Hour C®MMNT. w rb n w .Ex4tdrg Traffic With F ug Ts? Signal (Year 1991 ____ wwo-r ati wo www.wwrrrrw_ tinww.wl _ Ia .w---------__ VOLUMES GEOMETRY NB SB EB WB NB SB i EB WB LT 10 20 30 60 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L. 12.0 12.0 TH 1000 480 5 5 M T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 PT 20 20 80 20 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12 .0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12t 40 2R 10 10 30 10 ■ 12.0 12.0 12 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 '. 12.0 1 ;' . 0 r 12 .® «:+wen .d Yr..b+r.riw+ ---- --- -.Wrwar- -..s►+ww `.+ y,�,__�„,._wrr.rrw�.rwr.r'1w+i wfw_.d wuwirwworYr+w■ww w.r .wr erwMru � +'•�' ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ----- GRADE HV ADJ P<G BUSES PHF PEDS PED . BUT. ARR. TYPE ( %) (%) V/N Nm Nb /y Y/N min T ��..; ©© 0.00 2.00 0 0 0.90 :... 10 1 14.5 3 WE 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 14.5 3 NB 00 2,00 N 0 0 ` 0.90 10 V 20.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 - -w--ww- a- rrwww.r>w-sre.yJiw.wwsw rw.o ww---------.------------------.--------- ww..ws mMww w iw irr +k- nww. wIW ---- --- - LENGTH = 110 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LE �^ SETTINGS -1 PH -2 PH -3 PH -4 PH-1 PH-2 PH -3 PH-4 LT NB LT EB X - TH TH RT X RT PD X PD W6 LT SB LT X TAI TH; RT )4 D X PD x 10.0 44.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN . .. 0.0 � w 0 V 4.0 4.0 0 0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4 .0 YELLOW b -_:tu .,.. . :_ .. - wiw+i.n eu W.4' 1,y wd Li►`sow wrr w ..r „.s ur.e Mr e.l ..ii s3' LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE E V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP LOS �'-a. R� r 0.066 0.100 34.1 D 20.8 TR LR 0.810 0.409 20 WB 1_, 0.131 0.100 34,,3 0 15,6 TR 0.393 0,409 14.9.�s a D NO 0.103 0,191 27.9 D TR 0.210 0.191 A4.3 /� 4 r� 'd SE L 0.206 0.191 28, X7 S TR 9.055 0.191 _r.------,------------.--...----4-------4---------- r 23.5 1� -wei i+y+t K.vs --+ wiry :rwr--- wr�i::...a r.wn*-- -Lr- -- -- . .. aii wlwlGww rl w.�.+■:iv t�i.i �' i.. Fr Wi.Y w.irwo�.l ... �wi .■n wd riw 0.712 • �OS� INTERSECTION: � ) .• D�lr 22 43. .~�� v . 1985 I1CM,- ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT t********** * **** ***: * **5y6�cy*�**mc * *** ** t alc�p. �k *** ** * ** lco <***** * ** * ** * W ** : ** INTERSECTION.; .Sr Cho1.1S Ferry Y Rd . /SW 1354Th Ave r AREA TYPE Y . r .ETHER ANALY T .. ' .. . 'FR ` DATE . .,m ■ r•.....5- 1! -70 TI ME . . . . . . a . a . AM Pea f Ho u r COM ENT . ....Existin With Site Traffic & Fu ...WeW .... ,......4.. 400.w 4,0 ri..r OLIN -..r W.ri rw- Call -- -errlr --..- ...d..wr.wrr- WO rrr- w,J:hvwar MOP errMOW WO/ ---- ryewWOW* WO Wrllwr- as it 4..1..1.11ill - lYw- V•AM- ew-- erw--Iw Mw--- VOLUMES a GEOMETRY EB WE ,,NB SB • EB WB NB SB LT 0 45 35 60 = L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 1. 12 rS% TH 1600 .480 5 5 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 20 12.0 12.0 12..0' 20 135 20 �'R. 12..4 TR RR 10 5.0 30 10 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 r 1 2. -: 12.0 1 2 . 0 12.6 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ..rM lerv...'.r+..S. ..r v .. �.+.ri WA ..r rte+ L. a� ..i goo ....w .u...ii .a..rr..r ..+iwrwrr .o ar.irwuwr..learw . r an.v.r Lr ..r �iV;i.' .. wed Me aM rw.w.r.w a. w..vw .r w.w iwww. A©JUS'iliENqT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PH ' PEDS PED . BUT . ARR . TYPE ( %) ( %) YIN Nm Nb Y/N min T ES 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 Y 14.5 3 WE 0.00 2.00 0 0.90 14.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20.5 3 SE 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 b '.90 10 Y 20.5 3 _..4.i:a.rw.wfi.i - a i .r- vow .s+w.s,..i....N w ciao ,• ...•wi her 4.1., 41. wi i.. ww�wwo..w.... ,..... ... wl ... .1. _.. .... .n: L. s...ww....Li... w i..i vow .... f SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH - 110.0 PH--1 01-1'.-2' PH -3 PH -4 PH -1 PH-2 PH,,-3 PH--4 EB LT X NB LT TFi TH % RT RT X PD X PD X W3 LT S13 LT TH X TH R'T X RT PD Pb X GREEN 10.0 44 » 0 0.0 0 ,0 GREEN 20.0 - .... 2 0 0 20,0 0. 0 0, . 0 YELLOW o 0 4, - • - 0 YELLOW 4. 0 4.0 4. 0 0. 0 .r.i.fry.....i..n..rs...a--- iwiw .ar.y d.w.y . r .....r..i r .........w ..i .err ".- .:r mey.i nrw...Luidew..sW...*..r....- LcVEL OF SERV ICE.. •LANE GRP . V/C G•C DELAY t:,iOS •APP . DELAY . APP . LOS EB L • 0.066 O.1i00 ..34.1 0 20 »8,- C TR 0.810 0...69 2O . i C • WB• L 0.295 •0• 100 35.2 0 16.5 0 • TR 0.393 0 .4l 9 14 » 9 B NB L 0. 120 0.1' .: 2 3.0 0 26.4 I� • TR 0 .423 0 191. 25.0 • Sib. L,:. • 0.2.06 0.491. 191 8.5 0 34.1. ' 0 TR 0 »055 0'.191 H i.Hg. 3.5 0 • .r. w Lr,. wi r L.. i..... rw `r .w.. w,..i, Iry ,vv.rr.rw f... w L.y Mr....:.d .f' w ..y Y....w . ` r ai Yw . „,„„ ww wi per ri i.Vi ".:...r w, rl. r .h..:..+ra+.''..r.w- ..rer.wi7.l iaw.ora.r.wL...+1J.: r..Y .n.r .ii6i.n ...r .r i.ai �.al �. TNT. RSECTIO ►: Delay = 22.6 ( sec /Veh) Vj . 3;'1 Los • J • • • ' • 1985 HCM: SX(NALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION . .Schol is Ferry Rd ./SW 135th AVe AREA TYPE . ',OTHER ANALYST. DATE . -5-17-90 TIME . .PM Peak Hour COMMENT . .Existing Traffic o With Future SiOnal ( Year 1991 ) VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LT 30 80 20 40 TH 640 960 5 5:T AT 30 80 30 10 TR RR 15 25 10 5 . EB WB NB 8B 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 i GEOMETRY WB NB Se L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 .., W . • ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE ' HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED . BUT. ARRU TYPL (%) (%) y/N 0.00 2.00 N 0.00 2.00 N 0.00 2.00 N 0.00 2.00 Nm Nb O 0 0.90 10 O 0 0 ..90 10 O 0 0.90 10 N 0 0 0.90 10 PH- PH.-2 EB LT X TH RT X PD X WB LT X TH X RT X pD x GREEN 10.0 44.0 YELLOW 4 4.0 EB We NB . SIGNAL SETTINGS PH-3 PH-4 NB Y/N min T Y 14.5 3 Y 20.5 3 CYCLE LENGTH = 1.10.0 PH-1 PH-3 PH-4 LT X TH RT PD SB LT TH RT PD 010 0.0 GREEN 20,0 20.0 0 u 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 x . . LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP . V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP . DELAY APP. LOS I- 0.197 0.100 34.6 D 16.E C TR 0.526 0.409 16.1 C L 0.525 0.100 38.1 D 22.2 TR 0.819 0.409 21,0 C L 0.069 0.191 27..7 D 2515 TR 0.094 0.191 23.7 C 58 L 0,138 0.191 28.1 0 34,5 0.034 0,191 23.4 . . INTERSECTION: Deiay = 22,7 (sec/Veh) V/ = 0,746 LO8 = C 10. ,.. 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT mac .: * * ****** * * **** : * * * * * * * * * *** * * * **** * ** ** c * ** INTERSECTION ..SC�h�OQ le Ferry Rd . /SW 135th Ave. .11.. AREA TYPE..•r.OTHER ANALYST ... . . . . F'RC �7 DATE.t:rr..a- •ie.5-- 17- -9�C� yy �+ IME . . . . . . . . .PM Peak Hour COMMENT r ... . .ExiStifg With Site Traffic and Future Signal --- .Y•MY-- .- . --YI ----------------- ------ A.a VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 30 170 25 40' L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 640 960 5 5 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 30 80 75 10 0 ' TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 15 25 45 12.0 12.0 12,.0 12.0 X2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 l'.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 •.0 diai ---iw .r far w.., s -m.. '.... .ipilisi '+r1'�.�%I�r.rwwa.e..sw�r s�..ir+s+rirw.wd.r iru.vin.lur.vwww + riw ati •:.. i.r,iw w.. •w: r..r4.. .dr �r -.r w.ir. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PP"'r PE*OS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00' N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 14.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 V 14,5 3 0 9 0 "l 0 1r' 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0, 9 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0 :90 1>< Y 20.,3 3 ra.r wifor awvwi.. n. wrwru.r i'dr .rr os Yr R+++•�+•ir lwda. wwWwr.r • sTGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 115.0 PH -1 PH -2 PH-3 PH-4 PH -1 PH -2 PH-3 PH -4 EB LT k NB LT TH TH X RT RI' X PD X Pb( WB LT SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X Pty K GREEN 15.0 44.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 YELLC`W 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 . -.. .. __... ,. _ . ...:. .. ,.. ".•�..... '..� .....4isw•i wwwiw riiii:7rw.'`{.!.5.i.W wan i.d wr•r .. e..• .n.i•r.r.+r adl vn wwi w'rw.+---------------------------------,,------ LEVEL OF' SERVICE ANl� GR V/C G/C DELAY 1.05 APP. DELAY LOS LANE GRP. APP, EB L 0.142 142 0 . 139 33.1 0 18.5 L. TR 0.550 0.391 17,8 C 146 L. : 0,802 0.1.39 4 . 5 Ent 27.4 TR 0.856 0,391 24.0 C N8 L 0.090 0.183 29.E b 27.1 TR 0.218 0.183 25,9 b SB L 0 w144 0..183 30,0 0 36.1 TR 0,035 O..1-63 25.0 C .aa.Nr:a+'.r.iar ao irr•rrrwr.. a••:.•s.d ww'w'w�.w ..r'::t ".. . .. . .. it i.•Y•i :r..ra w•.•uw,ir .�wy.: 4 ---.- , .. .., INTERSE'CTION: L» D �,`� y.�, w 0,808 LOS y �r� /� 19e5 ' HCM: UNSIGNALIZED IN` FRSECTXONS , Page' -1 t c **** *** e*****: **** **** Yak c*** ********* * * * * * * * ***7k** Ica c*** **4:fit *a **** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION tirr NS ml4r oarMVer:Ml9f rinY irM 0ui law atlrr w.r war olrY eiiS4wiasra onw aarvw .rrr wbEYr lrw •r•wko�wiar wd ar e+ar ar rfy.rr werr rw'sa+Lr r+r .rr`w wr •rsww�w woww A l ERA,GL RUNNING SPED MAJOR STREET-. .a • a • • • •.;;.ri it w;r is tl a# a M: a a , u ■ w. ti f NAME a p a a i a a g o a a r i a 'a M •'a a 'a a a w a a • • a d l L'1 • d a, U a" OTHER INFORMATION: Existing With St;.j Tr INTERSECTION TYPE AND'-'CONTROL, vV aw e.y .u. Ma war iocu rr ws unr'.w aev evi awi ryr ecP /is ism vis e.r utw, rw w aam ita rr'We arm • .. .:" W w:r we d �V� awi iar .r `:+ •,w.ry ws .w wl.:at ww eF+r dw oii+ vw awlr wr ier ivr wrr. INTERSECTION TYPE 4 LE MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST /WEST CONTROL TYPE N ORTHI OUND M STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN .s ino rl .ii wi Yr we - -. ..r w> rw. neo• b-- ar► pia: .Y us - w wii Mio Mn w4,M MO J •s /W.0 6a wik iod •'r" w ien.d Mw' ... Sri wa'ISr �i fee a•I ... wersw.naiwrs wrr.r errr adi wd :br wu wa .ur wr wrvrrMd irr ,.r er w•V' EB WB NE SB , 4.4 aN, .. 16, ao r '' o w'wii err i.�l rwr iuu 0 250 S5 f� a NUMBER OF' LAMES AND LANE USAGE �." . .. . :;� Mirw�r.•ir"tiw iri �►id w!wr w. erii.wi �.i We7L�w.+; w.: e.r rro ecu +eras �wwL.v w6r .w. 5.ei irr td i.w :rr wd :.. «n,l. �... .w:.+...is:d,r.r..e JWr Y•+" .. . :rwiw 'wrwaJww+u.wrr:rr,�Ji+ eri tir wi �. �IEw rdi Wo ADJUSTMENT FACTORS f Page -2 � YrQ �...r wr wwir rr `ri WJ arr rw r.+r as Wrr '..nws.r r�iu Yar.worar[tarr.rdii Lir �rrf rrw uuwrar+wio.wwan�ra r.�vwrr.r +ti !.fir. r.. riw rr awrOr rr l+d rr -: Yr r.nr.ur .sr 4r. w.1 aurlRd�� Wwrissrw PERCENT RIGHT ' TURN CURB ' RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION ERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ..re.....rro.owwii■ EASTBOUND 2.00 90 20'' WESTBOUND -2.00 90 20. NORTHBOUND 2.00 90 20 SOUTHBOUND, x-2.00 90 35. VEHICLE COMPOSITION ' `^ wwi ww •wM:.�r e+ wo wr nw wwr aw w� iw �.r lwr .._ . ...... .... Mi ...... .:. .. _ .. i..i ww. ctr rr �w �ni�t.�r.rr a ..-i �.' wu r rti uir wwt SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAP5 sir woo wor - Yorj «Jr . .err ... ; w..o .:s aw •tea s' 0' 4 ♦.e irr rrr ae bs r. a+r r.r iw wi ..r rime ur - ilieM Cw rur ew +awi TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DXST. FINAL,, (Table, 10 -2) VALUE AD 'USTMENT CRITICAL GAP y HI' 1OR RIGHTS NB 5.90 5.90 0.00 B w90 B 5.90 5,90 0.00 5.190 MAJOR LEFTS 1A113 5.70 5.70 '0000 5.70 5.70 5.70 0.00 5,70 MINOR THROUGHS NB 7.10 7.10 0.00 S5 7.1() / s 1 d. ' 'r 00 MINOR LEFTS CAPACITY AN! EVELw-OF-- SERVIC Page-3 iw �w �M p�.ir mow+ iHO My P� wi iwr r (nir V ra iM 4M vw wMr.i�r.M.I wd W, im+wr W br ap+� kr �+1 wn IN'Mr Wn 4Mr 1sr W �r � •q1 /�+ we.M+ u .4iiwi •ur MO wr �i �wr , POT EN LOW- TIAL RATE CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcPh) c (poph ) ACTUAL MOVEMENT ' SHARED ' RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY c (pcph) c (pcph) ',. c = c - v ,C M H R SH 1rrr *■*■*W ayirs Yr+w*■*sy ,,rJ+AVS*ws L- .rs'w*-.. - ****** -.,�i rin wr'i MINOR ,TREET NL LPT' THROUGH C RIGHT MINOR STREET 59 LEFT 120 THROUGH 0 RIGHT 10 995 840 995 995 988 840 840 840 i S HOM: UNSYONALXZED INTERSECTIONS Page * * ** * * **** *** *;fir * * * **** lc * * sic *** etc. s**** * **' ** **** ****** * * ** * * * *** k ** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION'' wr rii u.1,wr s Wr L �«..,. moo AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED y r1■3OR STREET r U N w R a r,• a 4O PEAK HOUR, PAcTpR NwY ea m a 4•M Mw MN «Mad4 a M1/a� a 41'4woleo I AAAEA r/.�.. (/y 7 yR.yj rte,', 1YaA PPPPLAT IO r A .�q A N,, f • N A A.. a A A a a 4 li fP A Y�..•a Y r' a N N 'b �1 M a N N VOOOO Y MME HOF T WV, .ISTI V'T -STREET • 11 11 Y, O 11 N MIA Y 4 b ioun ai i Rd Y NAmE OF THE NORTH /SOUTH, STREET. a a a g r NAME OF THE ANAL1STYwNY6ARar NNr•$U TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. wewa•Mrk■r■dsMwMiiM'awNaMMdriow AM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Total Traffic With In Process Traffic INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL. L,r ir! �wr rew ari iir �ni w. w wr wig .. ..A iw. r. i�r 6w ws s G.F wr ui.�iw hr wr r wi w 6wiY `,:. �nr w aw wur ra witi wr' w+ irr w OW VAP wr :e .. wr p,e. i,ie+ww MJ w�a+n rr r.wJ�+rs .sw ,wr" INTERSECTION TYPE: 4 LE( MAJOR STREET DIRECTION EAST /WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN Imo EB WE NB SB NUMBER OF LANES AND 'LANE USAGE I, ADZ USS'TMENT VACTORS ws ww inrr.0 8rra.xiewuw.i,iw ww«vwws iw r�r wii �rriv wr •irirar.�s:rw ww e Pa0o -� sr 40 OW, wr.1.w r.i ter \y1 rlrwiv^!its i + CURBS RADIUS ( ACCELERATION LANE. FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTE)OUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLE COMPOSITION` {N1'NYa rii1/io4 rrlri err Mr rr rww w. rrrr r 4l10 011101 WAD rrr iv,: ow Mu err 's'ro.r wnwtfoorr.n tor wy v.ww,wr 4wrsii too taw ems woo r tw go, 4'flrir Wit* OW rw ioi water w We rw w rri sr .4. :W. on w. iri % COMBINATION VEHICLES EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS W4 wrrw of wir r.r rri aw ..r &rr 44 44 ssr.imw� TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. F NAL. (Table 20 °2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICALi SAP mew ...pi ad +r w.rr ir4 irr .r. 44. 4.4 ror w d 4 for 44 144 ww ar W4 w wn Woo 4r.411.4 is4,4446 �r':isirr'44.4 ,WW •r wwir. 5 ei. 70 S '90 MINOR LEFTS NB 7h. 60 SB 7 d 60 n yr i�r ww �nr ae aMi tiir sw. lanr �iv+r. sw14r hr w+w POTF. Nrn FLOW -" TXAL RATE CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph) c (Pcph p wr v.i:w 41.110 e.r.i.i .r i■r 0400 a.n kss weer wow ele.. ACTUAL MOVEMENT CAPACITY c (pcph) SHARED CAPACITY (pcph ) SH ao aq er aw w.w .ti/r r~ aw, ar RESERVE CAPACITY c �' v LOS P SH • MINOR STREET SS LE , fl $( H R♦..'- MAJOR STREET EB LEFT IdB LEFT 927 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS os aw w'Fwi.. wr�wsa. wwrrrJ.�Yw ww..�rww rn �a wr`.wrMr wfrww.w wr 4�ar ur.rMwrwaw L.w'9r wii wn i�a wr ar iafnwaw �r.,.aro �wiw.or �lrlM i,x`r',M a.YwwZwiww i�aerr +an w. PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR ' RIGHT TURNS ',FOR RIGHT TURNS av a+. wira.,r algvraw rr eiw iw. ww ap�.w ww 9rs aw:w. w"w4i�at wr+nrrw.ws wr 1Y,�i'iii.ribr:.7l.n w wwii.,.ra.f.ii . dsr . rrwis.. iiM tlw ar bar ar/I M wi. EASTBOUND 2. a 00 , 9a 20 . N WESTBOUND «2.00 12 0 N NORTHBOUND 2.00 '90 20 N SOUTHBOUtID —2.00 90 3.5 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ..... ar w `.or �e ao i.n wr aai iew w.� wr w iwr aw.r ar a:i b.� h+ iw r iwi r �mii� r� lr 4� aa� awr o. 4u w Yr irir i w a.r r.w err .�1 a4r/ aw wi ilw aw rr irs EAS TB0UND WEST &OUNI NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS SU TRUCKS % COMB I NAT I ON AND RV's VEHICLE'S %. MOTORCYCLES �r.w a. craw aw ar'i.dw +r ar iw irivs inr a.w ai w. wofan :mr .ii rr ---- wrwr.miai�rw tiw.wr -- 0 w eRVs wri� a.i w. ii.r iiai u�.aw w ar wii'iir it u .w �i ai. uw ww •i.. Sri Ww r.ii iwi rM wr ww aw Iss iri wr wr` rr laii it..id ir. w.. a irw w.ar. ww'. art iii �.n �n wr wii �a y.'ii _ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST : FINAL (Table 10 -2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP .ni 4;0 4. ar viii ur aw qs w....r. nw ra . iniir/.uariiwiwaauir rw isii.rlrY,.ir is loran is. ar sio am au wir. a�►airr 4i., wsw �W. MINOR RIGHTS NB 6.90 5.90 0 , 00 5.90 Se 5,90 5 . 90 0.00 5.90 MAJOR LEFTS EB S''.70 5.70 0//0�� S 70 0.0!0.0 5.70 MINOR THROUGI S y*y jj NB 7010 �%m10 a00 7.10 a..o MoD 7 a MINOREF "a s E 7.60 7. 0 0.0 b 7p 5r 7.60 7.60 w�l' Mw,rs w iirr aw7''M iu.r rvv riur wdrD,rYrl iin 44 wr Wrr wiww eat l+rr vrrM brrwrrauuwwr vr ro y.. FLOW TIAL RATE CARAC IT'Y p '+r vrr Mr w:vrM:V.i Ns a:vcr}es err votiVwin* wl w. waor rr vw wdr IiM Yrr Nvv,. SHARED • r RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY Y ;poph INOR STREET. NO LEFT THROUGH RIGHT MINOR STREET SU LEST THROUGH RIGHT 28 536, 5 SAO a. X985 HCM n UNS I ANAL I ZED INTERSECTIONS Pa a -1 **** Ic * *** * * *** * * ** *** ** *** ** **** ** * * ********* sk* * ******* * * ******* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MA3OR STREET.. rO �r.Ywi Yw. Ylwt Ar .. .. Yr.11.'Iillr ar■r111CJ%W Yp!rr YAYI► I.r Yrrsw.r� a• w r Y a "Q' 0. PEAS• HOUR FACTOR,.... a° a a r w r w r a, tl aim r a a h d a o e M a• a w a M AREA• OPULATIwN .. a w .: a ■ '■ R 9 . 4T .. 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET tl r . ■ .. ■ • • . . • a a Bull Mountain Rd. NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH S T R E E T . . . .. ,4 . SW .� 3 .{{.r h1 /�, a a' a ri r n■ n a S VM it � �'lr 1ir'1 Ave. n NAME OF THE ANALYST...... aaba a,......rnwdsuasaw FRC DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( ym Wd /yy ) . » . • . a & 5-17-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.. OTHER INFORMATION: Existing With Site Traf' i INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL T'° r %E NORTHGOUND y STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND STOP SIGN irr iYr "rr w, w. _ rr 6wi Y.r vi.wn .... wr rr wr wY 4w.ian r igr/ w+ irN u�i wii.nr i m rsw a r ar w wr iRi ;st ii. Mau r■. iir lr ■d "rr liYi iwi riii ii iie u.7i w +mr ,:r Yrr wMl rw YlM ire iru iri ira rri r.r .rr as ixn Y.li. rir _rll�rri.ri ... whir lti: :rriw ..iii r.o arwrriw w e i.r ur Y.I rir rYl -r i+iii v i.r rr irr ii.J — rri ini nr iwi rrr r it i r w: aei r ri w W rrr tnt w+ a i an irr ri i in r.: i.r aYr Jr i awY rw: rri.w a.r L:,wi � :ir'iit r.I ruS w: i.1 ktir „ia l 10.1 it 00 10011rri iry irr ADJUSTMENT FACTORS :.. ,wlacicbsl r.w'ws wJi.w....r +rir -.. rMwr: ... .6w-- 4 w., iar .'w *?'". Y...w, 66 66... W. w,.a..n. 66 ..6] ••+ «w 60 w..,. u.r Y.. W.. 66 Wn......... losn. '. PERCENT ` RIGHT TUi ',,N CURB RADIUS (f t) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR ,RIGHT TURNS • Wrlw Wr w..�. au. ..+w�. oa WS wrin4 WM Uiir ✓.vi ie' .a1....w.tr WYasr wiw u�wiY.iakw W►wrWrem .r{.'.. W.ygyiw1bwww�.�w.u. YYl ew tMV Ui. tas.w �. EASTBOUND 2.00 90 20 N WESTBOUN)) -2.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 2.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND -2.00 90 35 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ww wr'w 6., .fir w. W.. wel wr ts.s is .. w.I l'Fr wir..w. w e ors .66 ■r ,waw. wY,IFIO rWr a.. rp-..w ib. IOW w..YIw W.0.1 iesr tans r+en.w.i..n IMP .wiw.i -- *MY aN ei.+WU,11. e�Y % SU TRUCKS ;_ COMEXNATION AND RV' S VEHICLES % MOT'; RtYCLE y and r..El� ..: _. wr.i.�u.. u..wr.YM. ind wJ wr w.r wv.a. w - a.Y•..r r. r.u. r4v iw- `io!•hra ..r..0 Y.i. EASTBOUND DES r BOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL OARS w 06 ww w6 wi w 66 64 wa w w.r n1 b w .. 64 . ir wWi;i.w li+i wr .miwi..... oW ww.woi TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST FINAL ( Table 10-2 VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICOL GAP %6Y atl le W t'" . 6664r k: w66. mar isJ • w wr wY Yr' wY. 1.0 Wr i w ww.wa i1.. Ir. w Ywia viii ior..o. or ai, w.r wir YG1J 11Yb.iar.oi iKS.b. icai Y..r MINOR RIGHTS �N+ (i3 �9' O 6,90 Q� 0./00 at SB 5,90 7%0 5.70 0.00 i(� F MAJOR LEFTS B 5 .. 70 , 5.'O i 0.'00: EB • 5..70 , . 0..00 '. MINOR THROUGHS N a10 • O, SB 7'... 1:0 7 i0 01 0 NCB ? bG7p • CAP�,CI 'Y AND .LEVEL -OF-- SERVICE ` -�.I iww llw iwM lM�Y..Ww*si F1'rM �.l+Yn ' '`�' ,T '.. � �• � r tr+Mw �.w�..w1lKwii+.rN }uwrar+wrw urWw. 6w wb�W�.wf ww w.w. •w re. i.r ..+. � 4.rw�' war'�+w + ... er .ww.W.w+�:.w.wrM++ai+b.' \�•►,. ,. :,a POTEN- FLOW- TIAL RATE CAPAC € TY v(Pcph) c (pcph) ACTUAL MOVEMENT CAPACITY c (,pcph) M M rw MO wM:dllllM�- Mti� SHARED RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY 0 (pcph c -v LOS MINOR STREET NB LEFT THROUGH RIGHT MINOR STREET SB LEFT THROUGH RIGHT MAJOR STREET EB LEFT We LEFT 1985 WCMw UNS I SN AL I ZE D I NTERSECT I ON P::- age — 1 *y``*yy*** =.' T*'T **** *l** *T y *°T*i**%*y **+* **** `y WLi *******y * IOENTIF � ING INFORMATION w..w s�wr`e iii w„Iwr- eiriw+ wi4.�Ys»aw aw,.l� wr Mini�w __•_mr___�YW b�wir,ww wri }.w wr sr /s�wYl wwr r,�e aam.+n MV /ar�rrwr .. ar�W AVERik.GE RUNNING EPEE D s MAJOR STREET. ■ Y a 35 HOUR FACTOR __. a w a. a a d a b a Y* a a• r r. M Y r a w• e, Q'� 1 PEA a■ara. r APEA. 00 ULAT ION Y d; Ip a .. r w. a n. 0 d d Y a d a d d Y w ■. w w w w a w r a r 50000 NAME EAST/WEST �*`�' ch 1 s Ferry R 6. OF THE 'fwP°��T /��+.G.� IJ �7 i ��T r, a ■ r ■ . a ii r K a Y a . r • w d,�.�1 w w� a7V 1 I.F. ��.�w 1, Ri 1 i � i�d. NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH S T R E E T . . . . , . . . . . . i . r ▪ Beef Bend 'Rd .: NAME OF THE ANALYST...—. b • a . Y a . d w w d m a w a FRC DATE OF THE 4 NALYSIs ( rmI d! yy w s h . ,. . .w . w 17 90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED, a . , e d a , d « .... y Y F .. M . ' ... PM Peak Hour 0Th8R INFORMATION: Existing With Site Traffic INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL dour.l...w.rwi —nn — i.a`.4 —inn4n. .. .. :Yi4.weras— i --s—•, . ' ' w aao 4w CW nA s iiY wo*..r w. *+� tiar w� 4w aiJ url iri Fr wJ 4atr W iriw a,w 7 �� r ,sdi�i.7r iJY INTERSECTION TYPE: T- INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET "DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP, SIGN 4e04wi4.Yis NOrerri4Yi+ 44th a.06.4s*w..ii41.6m444i4wa*rau.* :.1.4440 ad...4..04.ia4 00 aw•. 04000044144444.600444iO4rsa40a400a44444i 404: 0044400.44444i4.440a444r4400 .... LEFT 20 160 170 THRU 200 3e5 0 RIGHT 155 140 105 7i:d;.n(.:: "�+:.: ..+Y ri.: aw 4r 4wi ar 44i«» 44 ,i.:+J i+.s wiY 4.Y rm... �4. 4+. r,Yi. iw ar 4ie 44i dwi ;..• .;., _. .,d �.+ 4"44+'id:44"4,wl�r .::4 44,;.«s.,atw :iod:r +.;: M4%6444' "q4"4" c.w hroi'*44"'r .i. LANES I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Rtget2 lrrrar ws wigsio wr ar bo w'r:.. wr wr �vrrr rw►rr rw 4.y`riaw eir is +rw wi �.dA air CAPACITY; AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE ,. ' e� Lwr ow �9I wM YB► teen w 4w hew 1� vu+wid eeeeY wM i�rr sir wir'w+i .wi a:i .r iw� ww wii w w tiw wi ar I wr v� uws aV "iri in► b.r w++ei � afi, -rw wr ww m 1w. IM Ws oa..�.� Sri rrr �Ni vM�tirJ rw Yrr Mr�+er w�o6 Wr,!M4�1'wI�Y ■Ini r v. eami, • POTS FLOW- TIAL RATE CAPAC'bTY MOVEMENT v( PoPh) 6 (PcPh) ACTUAL MOVEMENT CAPACITY, (pcph> RESER E CAPACITY ply= = T OW MY claw 40 WMti woo 4ew w.: ,wm•*la ili es**, 01w ��1 w� {OYI CIO MINOR ' STREET NB LEFT 187 257 RIGHT 116 813 MA3OR STREET WB LEFT 176 8 38 838 838 662 1985 HCM a IJNSXGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 * * * *** * ** ** * * ** * ** ** **** * c **d:**** * * ****** * sic * * ** **plc ** k***1 * ***** ** 7.0EiiTIFYING INFORMATION 4W ww w— iN*uoW•r•WTO aTwwrwp WOndarhrwn►T• wmrwi.rawar Wwr w++,r.✓rr Maaomwow iwvw Wwwr wooWJee`r r:+r 404+41T wwi, r rni wr wrTook PEAKHOUR FACTOR. ! ■.ardw• dw • wr wa w dn■ ra4 ■ 1 AREA POPULATION r X w .. n w d O k p w ▪ w b w■ w .... d ■ w a.■ w d 50 0 00 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. a r • a • ... , a p N «„ d p a N Scholls Ferry Rd NAME OF TI-1 NORTH /SOJTh STREET. .. w Beiti , 1' : d Rd a KATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm /d d /yy) . w N a w .. ■ n. FRC o d d r•. s d, a w N.! w N 5 -1 17-90 • w a a N• a • u • N a N N AM Peak k Ho0.x1 1 OTHER INFORMATION: Existing With Site Traffic' wi WO b+ iaa, w W wi . r ao •V+i ..i � rir wi wr ww. ww di rN Iwr' tiw INTERSECTION TYPE r. T—INTERSEI tON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/ WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN u+d wrdew G.r`nawa.r ww Mi OW w.+ar WO OW WOO OW OW VP.:.N aa.r.-1rH bir{ i l_ ma, wir sr uw w rr wr To ,Ti E8 WE NB. ' 'ti+E; r+wirwrb .i�iw.+' —* .aw!ww_* rilwuwlw. LEFT 20 SS 110 THRU 405 35 O RIGHT 210 140 145; NUMBER Or LANES ,,,wi ` ' • ' � .� . " "_ "' " "' rJ:r L.wi :er .w G.w iwr lw ww weU .s r✓'ws wi rr` w. b.Y Mu Liriii:� w +a `rii �:i av} �ii�. ia+ wi wdii ,'w wi iw+ �ii:F mw wrr w+wr ir'i .ir � ioi a.r � {d iii wn+lei iau.�wm iwii lwY ld v rl W. (:tii id alsii WB Nt sB r "W.a wil}'wi r+i+.: wri wwjai Lliri wrw of Y.+a i.ur rwl wwr�od is kq it wwK w4 ii+iwtl" LANES: At)JUSTMENT F CTOR P«g( --2; rWw ...� .rw wwti w w'iw wy wr wi fwr Yii Wr+w ww Oa WO aw w WM w WM hww raM wsr ∎Wo OOP wa ar VIM ais wr w w a. w w e w.s....r wl w�a ihr Y 1wr .40 MI w 4w w'a. had is+r ii.r w+u "wsr r+s PERCENT RIGHT TURN ,CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LAME GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS' . rwr dpn �. drr rwi sar as .w aw wed rsr 4dw asa�rrs L+w lsir atii.alw4�ier sat rgwwr rwwr.s.c.ai...i ii.a sad t'+t �a +'ir �c:�swiew . EASTBOUND, 0.40 WESTBOUND .00 'NORTHBOUND .00' SOUTHBOUND VEHX LE: Cf7Mi OSITIO • . w+r l 4. ,>' 10 wd asr ri iuw 4C hrii wd iiw.r wr rrr Ihw. �Wr r+i hiY i1W .sr ar W WNW Err *tee �4 iw Yu wsr w wal ae w Ow w w wC � �.is aidur wM Irr :wilier {r� tds w asr aid limit Wm aid hiao arcs ar ws W r wa,lir Iwa w .8ia air w wd Sr w wr w :.... _ .. % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND iw w ad in r iw 4W W. adi W. •.iii it hill W i `ia eiu We w+i 6.4 W. it did iSw iri a.;k *a, "wi WO IMO OW WM .r ■ii OWN ••■ r ii11, a wii TABULAR VALUES AD:;USTEE SIGHT DIST rINAL (Teals 10w2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAR My dmimar ww iJw iiw nisi -wi ssd ssJ irw acia aai whew wdwr r,ir 4n iw ori` wmir'dr i.a aYauu +si Mr adi •dd aid ad wiitw hsr dawiisi� B 5.10 5.10 0.00 M TNcR LEFTS NB 6,80 6 .86 O a OO CAPACITY ANDY LEVEE -�0E- SERVICE Ms airww wY aar wi. ewe ww. Sri. wM weir ws 10..4 116 Wdiv w+ wwrbp web ljir•Aim amp into bw POTEN- FiOW -: VIAL RATE CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(Pcph) c (pcph ) P Wdwr +∎wrw104.0 ekN w�►ww M.i wM a,ge w+a iwr w�..u.s vw 1+v ewe w+r ww 1se�'e wN ryr �iw �.. Mw W �l �:i. ar or {w w� 1ui� awe wyr wr wr'or irn ww W. w( ,i+� ww'ir `yi ACTUAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY (pcph ) (Pcph) = c �' LOS M: S H SH --------- W-- --- w---.s - -- -il,ir--- r -rr -- awlw�ns MINOR STREET NEB LEFT 121 339 RIGHT `' 160 620 MAJOR STREET WO LEFT 620 620 620 t�60 1985 HCM = UNS IGNAL I ZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 * * * * ** * * * * * *:* �c'x�c�k:�k'�1.**',�cak* tic*% k* 5K* Ska9c*** ak*�l c** a' � * *�;�c*�c�k�c�C:�c%'�c�c�l:�kYk Vic* *fir*' *aik *:k:� Sk i*waai+.nwwawvti1r wir,mwiwrWwinen amonwwr,ullmina AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET... w p • m M M • a 35 PEAK ' HOU • FACTOR.. m a ' a m ..w a to a a k a m a M a h a IJ M w m. a• AREAPOPULATIONS • a s r n M w m i fr • w a • a r a• riw m w w 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET---- ■ am m ma Y it k a b a• w M g m Walnut St. 1 H STREET....... . NAME ®F' THE Nt�RTHlSDl1 ++"�'yy .►w +}� . - �p� m w i.w r M i ■ w b M SW 1 a:7 �� 4r 1:1 Ave. . NAME OF THE ANALYST.. 1+ M a w u r w b h w a w a■ M m w A M ri a a w a a FRC DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm /dd /yyl aaaaalia w. a: 16.4um 5— "17 --90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. r w r Y r r ... Y r k r M w w n a w a w M ,y w a a ri AM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Existing With Site lTraff INTERSECTION TYPE AND , CONTROL, 40.11.4' . a a " u:ii wr wri ti w 4.Gr w i 4.y w ww W r wJ 4i wwi w war W w '�N INTERSECTION TYPE: T— INTERSECTION MAJOR. STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN GN ER WE NE www wa:W r..;:w.w+ .:a..w..,. LEFT 20 2S BO THRU 160 35 D RIGHT 30 140 GQ NUMBER ofF LANES uN . P4PaTmNT rAcT P :Mr uir µJ,W «e IN ar a+r W iwi 6mr rw r" w re+ gym. ww I.in �i.. m 4....w cwlr ..w w ad W mw �.mr rw swl w w�iwi ilr W werps .u. ir. ai...r .r gar ww ww a Mw mw'w rr mlr rF • pir ma/ w Viin mp mr Yr' "'• . :. mrr mw 1mr 1n� rr Y(Ji mm� b PERDttNT GRA08 ) EASTBOUND 0-00 WESTBOUND 0.00 NORTHBOUND O a O0 SOUTHBOUND m...dvrrY,..w; VEHICLE COMPOSITION CURB PAc x,� S ,� ft) ACCEL RATION .Ar E 'OR RXHT TURNS FOR RI!T TURNS -. �rr.� �ai� W wrior'w w or.� rr iri+wb o W iiid tiuid .. � r`o w�w+aw wr Mir wNwoirr:ei.i;aaw.�r:Iww wii wn Fiw bM rM �Wwb llYlliad''YV iwr rri 6idi�ra.:t,Ys wiw�y.:.rir ids .:Y.M.r i�.p ru 'mii Wri.vAlnw►.l etr`mw ears -swwwW ww btJrwl. Yni wfi�: :iws d'a ami uui weY.wrww '. : .. SU TRUCKS a COMBINATION AND RV'S VHICL,f}:S EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 4r w wd wi mn +mi fiwi � «r �wii. �xr wrn Wi :.' rw{ pis mw muss+uriWistierim6.wi:ani. ismwieUimnmii �erir�rii.isawierrmoo awgiio. �... �. ..,.�:dymr1Wi.r— eW.iiwr:.r�irwi mr,•wy s+ms w4 m�6 fed irowvviel Wiwi MINOR RIGHTS NB AD+,iU TED SL T i X `d' VALE AD3USTHENT YdiWWei iwki: i;sr •,r" . r:.m:: eir.ali m•r rir .i: aid kag eri'w: `INAL CE XTICA : CAA . 6 u80 0.0() 6. m O C ,{ ACITY AND i EVEL°°°CC ^..S RV CE irrl ar itii.wr iw +rdr iur .rr rre i.J w+ws +�w. irn air a dw nv iex wr�r wr .w: wr wr �w .b L.v 4w ir. W w4..w «. ifa antM iiri'Woe wY ti POThN- ACTUAL PLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE' CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT ; v( pcph 9 ( pcph) c` (pcph ' pcph ) = v LOS SH R SH Lr iiai o . 1nU a4 ..Ur as a114114111. ar rer arwd a.l as WOO iii; 40.4 Wits loi io 4,116 ar wow Ow ar Ear .. --' lu'' -I cow OW ioi!hi.. yaw -4:34, wr as it rats � sir .rrTw, MINOR STREET NB LEFT 8 3 632 621 > 621 s 741 RIGHT 88 916 9,16 916 MAJOR STREET" W8 LEFT 28 987 987 ` e7 959 *AI, n w 4 . ,,�.: * * * ** *** ** C** * ** **** ** *** * *y *** *irk** **�k:k C*** * *�k *�+i * * ** *etc * **** "' UNSIGNALIZED ,IDeNTIF?]NG INFORMATION ' VA* .11, OM l w MSO v■PM VOW WIN NW`Muia Miir' an •• ss.6 *es 440, ww ar w.r -w _, w WWI' AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED MAJOR STREET. PEAK HOUR FACTOR... r. r» .b a a a a.r..rr rrw r, . PIRA PORULAT101 d.. a d r.. n r e err r w r r. r. d M r■ w r r d r. 0000' NAME OF THE EAST /WEST S T R E E T . . ,,,, am.04.til..4 : W� �, nub: St-ii NAME OF THe NORTH /SOUTH aTREJT r. M ..: n r a r 4. a r 'q , r W SW lasth A *tl e. NAME OF THE ANALY$fi ■ • r#. M. d w - r M d a. . w" r . :F RC DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (m n /dd/yy TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. k r r. w w l . is h 5-, —90 .0. PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Exi8ti no With Site Ttaffi INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL awr rw.l iA vow .r w1+1 _ _ it vw W au* wwo w or ..w v a for 4.4 w.ii w:ir fair b aw w., wN rr/ a+ WA, r .wr Li .sf wo i+y ••■ Mi is, w.i Lu a:i 1.ri r aw,,i.> w .iei i;:s w w iii r ww r.r w _ • law _ _ •■ war .ui' : `'' TERSECT I0N TYPE: T- I NTERSEC`i" I ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAS "JWks CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN •nl wL 'r i .�+' --r wrr. w ar i',e. aew w; W i>•wr r w;!' wi l w. i w:d 1w :w i.wi :al os rwi L! a+ L.i 1 ad ar. a w:f ......... - „. ru11i► 4w 1ie ww Li1aw a �J aii wwf wrr w.. wi.1 +Jw h.: 40 .4 .4.14 ar : u i.ri.,ri Nw of ..w f6w rw, 20 60 m.w 110 140 50 NUMBER OF LANES . wii ar a1i aa+ ai iri i. . inv' s.. 4_ ',+i ir.. ir'r �'i iia ii f - w"r L`r ■• ::ii.fwi r..1 r 6 Ly.'. ,w '.,, ✓„ x.:,if w :.: raJ rw w wl ;d a ii :n,'. wi�'sw wY� 1M iw �fwl IiWi d "ir. AD USTM 'NT , FACTORS ww wr wi+ww dw i•v a'iaw asN i♦wr wr uw ww �irsvv`Mw a►' IYw w.Liiiuw wM 4r w•Wr`ri.j4oi WA, .L wr.r ia, ww wwy4�rr.wwi V•it viw�wr +r Lwil " • . PERCENT RIGHT '.TURI CURBf` fAD � JS (f .. ACCEL AT ON 'LAND GRADE: I,�NaLE I,,F'OR�� RIGHT TUiNS FOR RIGHT '. TURNS woY.w Waaaw rwi•y.d uw nW i�aYr wr+w wx 1 \�wae.r rw WEnV ern aJ wwi4u M:a..w iin wr iw liw anrlwi144+1'tll aae iw►ws w;•.rii{:i••.++rr �r'. 41'` Bt UNIT 0.00., '90. 20:- i WtiF,STEIOUNp O.0Q 9�4. 20 NORTHBOUND O N O0 0. 1 0 r, SOUTHBOUND ;4.ia4++4. ..Mi.w... er, .0. srwwr rnawr nww wrw wia i+wror wdi.,44,4 iiri L.rss r.r irw EASTBOUND • • WES "I'BOUNO NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUNb SU TFWC <$ % COMBINATION AID VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES M.fw iw iw uw'awx�lr 4s w.. r»wa.,.+raYm ewaW.. /1�.v.4M , MIN!'.otr RIGHTS MAJOR LEFTS MINOR o:EP'TS TABULAR VALUE 1 DtUSTBb SIGHT GIST FINAL ( Table 10-2) `AL e Ab3USI M!NT { `ORI ZPAL 6AP 4•i iru.r wig. wpi,.'1 �?w MO i,it •w'o1v+`wi l; rwi Vd ai�lr!iri iaw bd yr.. Yi+ii. •IM1•r aw Wmr de i+iJ 'Lri.ra ar`iwiiiw whir ww +er ii iuwl hem NB 5./0 Sa70 0.00 we 5 410 5.10 0 00 0 6.80 (.0C PACITY AND' 'L V ;: *-OF -SEpVX r10ie:r�,i i0404 `411+01i0 i.} ro viii ay`r wil .w+wr .0.1000 pair err 000.0 0.1i POTEN- ACT ttt. P O TIAL MfOVEM!N +TE eAPACXTY ' CAPiNCIT v(pcPh) c (POPh) 0.(Pc.p�h P 01 ii ∎rwi hw a re in. •■• ienr00 MINOR ,STREET ti k NS LEFT 616 589 RIGHT 5,`a 969 9.F9 IIN3kiR STREET El LEFT 72 988 988 '988 917 ��i ►L�, ,x Y ►�L DETACHED rl Average V'oh cie Trip Ends vs: DINE L i G On a: WEEKDAY Average I ek � y / ®h cie Trip Ends per Dw►e ili� � Unit , �...�.......�......w.... ,_ �� •Y... Average grange of ' Standard Nurtiber e#f YAvera Nuthber cif Trip Rate ;Rates Deviationru►diis : Dwelling Units 10,062. 4.3,07-21.900 200,000 z a. 160,000 IJl r.3 l 120,000 w CD 1.x.5 80,000. 4.0,000' - a •x � x w li.wr Y Lr. �.P'�' • w L! iJLr':I l w_i ��r..w a��w Y4 ! L'd �,. ��" - * x. L w.... _. •_ 1 i ,• rr�."IH YO,.ulw.iwewiwn...i w+j ,��,`i%�[[��q'�::A Y x � .11...InNMIYgI.�LJT,1'•�' 1t�Y�Me..lMS��w1 it 2,000 4,000 y00o 8,000 10,000 1 „000 14,000 • 15, op. ATA poiNTs • Fitted C Urve . Ln y h! 0:059 bII1EC11O 4. D STFtIBUTIONra Riot avai ' rip G erg ira�i� ep�erri�� ' 98 'iinStitUte c4i"„ . � *Iitit�p�drtati�i� ��agin13��8 2r7 4 k , ..�:..: ....,.. ., .. ^, •� .. ry � . � .., i i �., h .. ,... ,, 1, I... . 4 , r i Y! -i' I � 1 � ;v €rage Vehicle Trip Ends vs: DWELLING '1 t On a: INEEKDAY AK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC, ONE HOUR BETWEEN' 7 AND 9 TR P GENERATION RATES .. • .. : s .sae r w ommr- , ......: u.�.rrrfi , to m woo, e•• ,ru.oa..aria i Average Vehicle Trip End (Weekday Peak Hon!' of Adjacent Street' Traffic, Cane Hour Between r and 9 Aoillia) bier ()Welling knit Average Range of Standard Number of Average Number of l ale ,.a...�� ti., ...« „" ia�, +ora; .-•- a.., Studies. Dwelling Units 14 0.333-2.271 228 ..�.x., 239.4 800 1,200 I 600 2000 2400 Z800' NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS 0 ACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTEDCURVE . .1a tr 1 • (T• �� i . _ ( y/ 2 Fitted Cut�/e Equation: L.n T ..0 9`� Ln A +� oi�:'� R 0. (J85 t)IF ECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION: 27% ehter, 73% exit Tip /� Goner tioni Septaztber 1981 /inStixthte of TrariSportati0 ;11 Etiginee' INGLE FAMILY DETACHES) HOUSING '(21 Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: DWELLING UNITS On a WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC, ONE HOUR BETWEEN 4 ANDS P.M. TRIP GENERATION RATES t�/;rwtr:rw .. .rr.i�ly - /'4��.wwnr;nrsl I.EYRII�e.wr�vs :. ,a.MM'as��raawrar <, Average Vehicle Trip Ends (Weekday—Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One etwsen 9 P ( � � ) �ta�eefi Traffic �n� 'Hour 4 and ¢M) per welling Unit Average Range of Standard ' umber of Average Number of Trip Rate Rates Deviation Studies Dwelling Units F .�y�;.."nw+wr,'Ja f lei"'. •L J2 _�� y..�+�• ,„,_. t ♦LL. �f1gMA.':�f L nw1`�"T"�4'�':SiW. i •i L �= V�t1.rw Ye1141. wry ••∎••11 - .OW4 l 1,200 , 0 2,000 x;400 2,800 0 'LLL NG UNITS • ACTUAL bATA ioUfls • Fitted CurVi c taatl ►r�» Ln(T 0.84 DIRECTIONAL STF B IT ION: 63% enter, 37% a It '' T I Geheraclon, Se tehiber 1 � � 987 /lns�i�t�te bf T�`abl�p�i�fbf�on ,�ri�3ne�rs FIGURE 46a PEAS HOUR VOLUME WARANT (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPUiATIn4y OR ABOVE 40 M # ON MAJOR S"TRE 300 400 50C 600 700 800 900 1000i 1100 12Co- 1300 J � R STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- VPH 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER. THRESHOLD VOLUME APPR0A0�4. Vli��'� =� T1��3 OR C}RE� LAi�IES t�riVD 75 FOR A MINOR STREET T��I?ESF�OLO. VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APP � APPLIES AS THE LOWER ROOT ONE LANE. d �'�ta c• � 4 j, � a°`t "dint e 1 sal 3 z. szT r 10 -14 URBAN STREETS The number of approach lanes also affects the capacity of TABLE 10 -6. CAPACITY OF ,FOUR -WAY STOP- cOtserRo ED multiway STOP- Controlled ntersectionS. Sicnte neous move- INTERSECrIONS %VIYH 50/50 DEMAND SPLIT FOR VARIOUS marts from a two -lane apowach can occur, increasing the Over- APPROACH WIDTHS all capacity. Table 10 -6 shows the capacity of four -way STOP- controlled interseciions with a 50/50 demand split for a range of approach lane configurations. Table 10 -7 gives volume levels which can be accommodated at four-way -way ,STOP - controlled intersections under reasonable op - erating conditions. Although levels of service for such intersec- tions are not specifically defined, Table 10 -7 volumes are approximately indicative of LOS C. TABLE 10 -5. CAPACITY OF A Two -nY -Two LANE FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND SPLITS DEMAND SPLIT 50 /50 .55/45 60/40 65/35 70/30 Total capurity, all lep. SOURCE: Ref. 9 CAPACITY' (V PH) 1,900 1,800 1,700 1,600 1,50V INTERSEt" rtON TYPE 2 -lane by 2.lane 2.1ane by 4.11ttnc 4-lane by 4 -lane 'Total capacity, ail lep. S''',URGE; Ref, 9 CAPACITY' (V n) 1,900 2,800 3,600 TABLE 10 -7. APPROXIMATE Li V'EL- or'•SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR -WAY STOP- 0*TROLLED INTERSEC- TIONS DEMAND SPLIT • LO C SERVICE VOLUME, VI'tl 55/45 60/40 65/35 70/30 SOURCE: Ref. 10 f s / / 2. IVz SAMPLE CALCULATIONS CALCLJLATiON 1-A T- INTERSECTION 1:, POcriptlon= :t tlaplc,.:.CP,M :: !nterieellon of A+ iitCtrgree wt ltr $ eit` IagtiloCatitfi -an-+acbairt area with a population of 100,000. Market Street is a two -lane collector, and Jones Street is a two -lane local street serving is residential development, It is controlled with a scot, Sign. There is no widening in the vicinity of the intersection, and corner radii are 20 ft. The intersection is depicted in Figure 10 -5. Residents of the area have complained that there is substantial delay experienced io the late afternoon turning right into Market Street. They claim that this is due to the need for right {d left turners to share a lane, and have requested that a right-him- only lane be provided: 2. Solution --'! i C T intersection worksheet Will be used for summarizing and organizing computations concerning this p T problem 'te whether or not the re- rot�leln. The is to ,evalua iinproVernent will achieve any reasonable reduction iti' the delay eXperienced by local residents traversing this location. 't ltt: coenptitatx nS on the worksheet (Figure 10.8) are deg scribe -f and discussed beloi►; 1. Existing peak hour volumes for the afternoon period were collected, and are sllmiTlarized as indicated on the upper.lef1 diagratin. The approach speed of major street traffic /vas also obsei ed, and found to be a0 mph, NUMDER OF LANES 2 ®Y4 1,800 1,720 1,660 1,630 1,610 4 BY 4 2,200 2,070 1,970 1,880 1,820 ,4 P 2. Since no classification of vehicles is given, nor is any grade pre' sent, volumes 4, 7, and 9 (which must be adjusted) are multiplied. by 1.1 to reflect normal traffic composittotL...'I e, ' ire he upper -right diagram for � in later coo entered on t `atf usPec�''voltacn easy reference ins are ante putational steps. 3. The RT from the minor street is the first movement con- sidered. The conflitting volume is computed as one -half the major street right -turn volume, plus the through volume with which the minor street RT Will merge. The confliicting traffic is thus found to be 270 vph. The critical gap is selected from Table 10 -2 for an RT from Minor street/ two -lanes on the inrtjor Street, and prevailing speed' of 30 mph. The critical gap is found to be 5.5 sec. There are no conditions which would allow adjusting this critical gap. yw pfikt • .....:� 1.�; • tel:: COOdi== �= fZf�9tE�c1- i i ®ii � 1iDi >��i iii iiii, �uIummums g��:::•:. II.1I 1,II1III111 8888\ ®�®E1� 1 E R®,. RREI®E� ._..': ry � �!:'�: •_:' �� y��ppp) ppp�Qpp��{y�[{E)}pppQpp([[(Q�Q� EMMEN E. {� pp� p�pppp • E �pq�Qgp$� j�MyQ{lpQlfp�$Y�yp$gq�pp ] pQ�{ pgp�5 [yQ�gygqq}VpW�V([.pQ'pM��jQy }gppp�p(([pQppQpppQpQgj( EME®®®®ORI ®RREMEM •••s �f• OOOOi ENJN E MMWWJrWCw"IV�MI�M :•'••t • - MERNEE� M Is 100- 200? 5017 Figure 8.. Warrant for left-turn storage lanes on two-lane highways. IMINIIIIIMONFIREMIMERMIKENMR PI »IS III IIE®11 -II. IMMNiillErklERERROME 1UI M i ME v M I1I1IRS.III tillll - • 1 MURMURER imanaminns MIS - MMUS MU 1� I51 L IIIR® ' �AI 111®I /1I■1 I Inn.IIeMIII1Mi �I ii : i1 I1IIIIIIII■ I1IIIII®t I1sIII ®I IIIIIIKII ®II,® I®5\ ■IIfIIIIII IIIUhINRI5lII N5 i . ` i ■ ►lRII1I F :. ��1III„■ 11I ■� IL .,� ammo 1 � 1IIIIII�I �IImummi1- m1 ® IMUMMIRMERAMMIMEIMMUIR IS EIRMEREIMMERRIERMIMMENRIN 51® ® 1I®IIS 1 lM RR_a ■p, wrimmummimmummummonimmincom 'REMEMIMMUISNIREERMEMBROMMEMMISAI II1+.I*®111IZ1I■IIIII'11515II MS ■IIIIII®IRI IIIIIIIi1I 151511111115515111115511151 I5I 1I1I■®I■®IIRI5RI. ®II II1 Gras, Unsignaliaad; intersections Le % Left Turns in VA S= Storage Length Required V- fr. 5. 500 WO:, 100; 200 300 400 000 GOO 700 Va ADVAIGI140' VOLUME: (MPH) aoo Sea 1000 1100- Figure; 9. Warrant fat left -turn: storage lanes on two -lane highways. F' Lit tr• t LI" MEMORANDUM CITY Or TIGARD, ORBGC 1 TO: Jerry Offer September 16, 1991 FROM Chris Davies, Developrent Review Engineer r RE SUB 91-0013 BURTON / S:9 IYU INTERNATIONAL Fnda.n 1. PHASING The applicant has requested that Phase II; which Is divided . • w • �, • rephase and e. SUB 90-04 this currently application, �beQ given venupermis soon to rephase the entire Phase II into 7 different phase and has submitted a phasing Plait. The Engineering Department generally agree s wit h the layout of the new phase line except for those that comprise Phase 6 and Phase 7. e proposed the � As rdpo�ed by applicant the following is how Phase's 6 and 7 would be developed: Phase 6 Lots 121 - 133; 240 259; and 280 -- 281 Phase ' ` Lots 134 139; 260 273 and 291 - 295 The main disadvantage this layout is that in Phase 6 there would be to an extension of a local road without benefit of an outlet; until Phase 7 is completed Therefore .. p e l be usedso that no street extended furl..her than lines 150 adjusted ,, feet without an outlet, b STREETS Acces54 to the site is Provide from S rW. Bu l . l M u n ta. i f Road, which is a Washaig ton county Road and is classified a l a Na or Collector (C-1). Cu rrently S.W. tun- t4ouacal has a varying right-of—way adjacent to he site and the existing roadway has limited' improvements a existing ,« ' 24 v`ementE with Travel roadway has apprc��cmately ,� feet of pa" shoulders and open ditches for drainage. ase on the Traffic Impact Study, conducted by Charbo neau ENGINEERING COMMENTS: STAB 91-13 BURTON /SEIYU Engineering, It is recommended that the following lane configuration be implemented along S.W. Sul l Mountain Road: . For the eastbound to northbound left movement, onto S.W. .139th Ave., a median lane with 75 feet of storage; and or the westbound to northbound right movement, t onto ' S.W. 13 9 �,h Ave . , a westbound r ight turn lane and school bus stop. the applicant's engineer has recommend that these lanes and the through lanes be 12 feet in width. Therefore, it is recommended that the applicant be required to, provide, ` as -a minimum; the turn lanes as recommend in the Traffic Report and half street improvements s set forth by �mprovement� �.n accordance with requirement Washington County. S.W. 139th Avenue is a Minor Collector street that is the . ction between S.W. Bull Mountain Road and the subdivisio 1. The applicants engineer as submitted internal conn�. a.n e t,,,ngirle plans for the street which meet the city's standards. In nt (Phase's I and Ix ) previous reports for this developm4.. y it was recommend that S.V. 139th have limited driv ^wale Bull Mt. Rd. and S.W. BenchvieW, this S.W. fw aCC�:55 bE'.tWL'en addition, ` it was proposal meets that requirement: In that S.W. 139th Ave . recommended , traffic .report tat the intersection ded in the lane configuration have the following la .- g i�. t. ` of S.W. 139th and Bull Mt. Rd. one inbound (northbound) lane and two outbound (southbound) lanes. Therefore, it recommended that the applicant be required to construct S.W. 139th c t ,t standards and Ave ev to Minor Collector street meet the requirements of the traffic is s �y`. Currently Phase I of this development, is still being . the plan it connection between S.W. Wal n P,s pa�'t o� she overall developmen �vas� req�.tired tY�at a nut and SW Bull Mountain Road be provided and that it be this is being accomplished completed during Phase II-A: ... with the development of S.W. 139th (Phase IT B) ; S.W. 135th (Phase 1); and Sion Coniferous (Phase /I-A). it Was assumed Phase I public improvements, s, inclusive of the Phase � vement intersection of S.W. 135th/Walnut,, would be cornplet∎ d and open to the public prior to further development. This road sYstem, the minor collector between 135th /Bull Mt., ... vital Therefore, is a vital cr�nnec� ion for this deve��:opznent„ it is recommended that Phase 1 stret4ts , and thr, improvements to 8.W. 135th Ave. be completed aria 8NGINEI RING CoMMENT8 SUB 91 -13 B'URTON/S11YU • p. A • 4 ti conditionally accepted prior to the recording of the plats for proposed Phase 2. All local internal streets meet the city's standards . g + e The applicants + feet et a s except for S.W, Alpine, Vlew lacants e�agan�.e:� has submitted plans that show that the last +/- 200 e the street being built with 2/3 street improvements. This street, will connect with the existing S.W. Alpine View located within the adjacent subdivision (i.e. Three Mountains). The Piann,ing /Engineering Department has been + contact with the engineer and ' r rmed him that full In ct�n nc� l.�.co street improvements would be required; the engineer is cur, rently working with the property owner to the south, where additional land, approximately a 12 foot strip at its widest point, is needles to bring the street upto current standards and connect with the existing roadway. Therefore, it is recommend that the applicant be required to provide full street improvements to all local streets inclusive of S.W. Alpine + .gyp, u e View � , or that local streets have full improvements and that S.W. Alpine View would be terminated at the east end of the first lot located east of the intersection of S.W. Alpine and Mistletoe and would only be extended to make the connection with the existing road when full street improvements can be completed. 3 STORM SEWER The applicant has submitted a preliminary storm sewer system layout; they have divided the development into three (3) different drainage areas. The first area would serve the northwest corner of the g going existing (as nai a go...ng into the he exlstin approvedein Phase II -A drainage 90-04) system. p� The second area would serve the northeast and central lots of the development with the dralnag e going into an existing s system a known as Three you ntain,a Subdiviio . Cu Currently Three Mountains subdivision is still being developed and has not been accepted by the City In addition; it should be noted that the City of Tigard is currently woi`)cing with the City's Attorney's Office and the Resolution Trust Committee (RTC) Mountains ' Subdivision . The developer and the bank that were involved with Three Mountains are no longer solrent and the RTC would 'like to work with the City and complete is date no , . i has been the pro> ect, but as of this �- strategy" h developed. + : , , Information cation It 1s f �'�.'� that thl�:a 1s lmpC'�L � an,t form in development, at lcastin part is relying on In that this dev��l public Service facilities t be fully acilitY�es that have not y complr,ted /accepted by the City. Therefore, it should t ENGINEERING COMMENTS: .. , SUB 91-13 BTT.t�T0�1 / SJEX�' 3 et rtqu that evidence be provided that the story Sower �.rec� System within :hi "Three Mountains Subdivision', is do p1eted and acceptable to the City pr&or to any . connection . Xa'f this development to that systeA. The third area could serve the southern portion of, the r,,, ion /retention pond deve�.e�pa�Yent and would ' �'o. to a detention/retention Prior to being released into an existing system that is south ; of this development and is, outside the City. Therefore, the applicant sk4ould be required to demonstrate the foil wing A. The existing system, south o f, S.W Bull Mountain Road, has sufficient capacity to handle the increased runoff or be required to "upgrade the SyStEm ", Complete details of the detention /retention' pond, �n • e cl uding who will have maintenance responsibility. SANITARY SEWER -. The applicant has subi itted a preliminary sanitary sewer Plan; the system is divided into three differen ; areas. gout i s the same i l ed in the narrative �n� -�s detailed The basal la st porl��,on for the stoc;, :. sewer system; with the northwest in a being server by the existing system as Provided and central portion early approved phase, the northeast being connected to the 'Three Hountairis Subdivision", and the southern portion beixbg connected to a system south of this development within Washington . County. Again, it should be noted that the northeast and central portion of ... elying on City a system that has not the proposed s�staGme ?ted 4 La:ty _and that t�.ere a;�'e ms Wi Yet be approve p by the p be required to demonstrate .:.. le With chat. � stem Therefore, it:. a;. Potential problems recommended that tl�e �;�p e applicant g � �.�a�Yst�ucta.c�e that the system they ar connecting ertinngti to has evidence the capacity and meets n Co g standards of the Unified gewerage Agency. ENGINEERING' CoivII►N'I"5 t QUA 9 1- 13 BURTC)N/sElW , "f . ,p Oy 44.. • Redo rnendat i on„e ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY, 1 Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings, and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate,, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for plans are in addition final review and approval NOTE, a these .. to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to pub lic improvements. • the "Erosion public • An erosion cont�.col plan shall be provided as part of the p improvement drawings n The shall conform to Control Plans Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1959. Jo The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainacr,' runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. 4 ▪ Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the pt�'� c provided bl.i improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic tap .e f thy, storm drainage basin area shall be provided as a supplement to Calculations shall be based on the pu�lit ia�pro�rement plaerviceable area The location and full development of the serviceable future lines shall be capacity of existing, proposed, and faro addressed. ., = existing and • A grading plan shall be submitted shoving the proposed. contours and typical finished floor elevations on each f the f �.or elevations at 4 different corners o of curb elevations as shown on lot including eleva the public plan tied to the top improvement plans 6 : Those lots, in proposed . _ Phases s 2 and 3, at will ae s public Services, � storm and Sanitary sewer systems , with .h. ad j acent subd vi s ion � (Three Mountains), shall NOT be granted Building Permits until, .such time as those improvements have been accepted and completed by the City of Tiaard- LotS south of the intersection , of ''" S.W. 5 : �1. �'ienchv� e� T� ,race and ,a ,Oe � L"mitted to access directly onto S :w Ma, :�tlet�� shall not be Fe S.W. 13 9th Avenue • All street improvements, rovements Within Phaaye X including 8.W. 135th, .. .. S .L of shall be completed and Conditionally approved . roved by the Cit and Washington + ' Y Prior ��.,gard an sh�ngton Coua��.. to the. recording of any '.uture phases EN G' 4, RING COMENZ'5 SUB 91-13 BURTON / SEIYDD ,w, • M 4 . The applicant shall be required to .provide, as .a min ,mum, the lane configuration as recommend iv, the Traffic Rteport and half street imProveMerlts, in accordance vritil requirements set forth by Washington County, to 6 .W. Bul1 Mountain Road. .0 The Detention Pond, which was approved for Phase I shall be completed and accepted by Unified Sewerage Agelk.y, with written verificatioa provided to the City, prior to reoordirg any of the new phases which , will drain into the Pond. IN AXE ]DITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS 1. � NOT �, LIST. Cif° `�`E c(��1I'?�°.. DEVELOPMENT CQ�PE, _ THIS :�S �Q� AN EXCLUSIVE L 1. SECTION 18.160.170 ThLprovement Agreement A. Before City approval is certified on the final p and before, approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Subdivider shall:. and file an ngineer em�nt with the City 1. pecify . the period within which all required specifying the p improvements and repairs shall be comnpleted and � . inc-. l de in the agreement Provisions that if such work is completed within the per i d speci fled, , ..I! i the City may complete the .�or�. and recover the full cost and expenses from the subdivider. a The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and NAY' also in time m d Gt�.on of the iznpr�� V sills t �"u Provide and for the extension of time under specific stages y in conditions therein stated n the contract 2 a SECTION 18*160.18.0 fond A. As required by Section 18,160.1700 the subdivider S al file with t he agreement an assurance of performance suppo ted by one of the following: 1. An irrevocable letter of credit a c' ec xted by a firan ;al in titution authorized to transact business in the stat of Oregon; • A sur bond eXecuted surety coany ! F=tY j si,ness in the state o aut�,hc��3 �,ef� to t�FIY'y.�acl: b'il Oregon ►hick remains n force anti th�G surot pane i� �.o�,ified the C�.t in writ; mar he terminated or 3 Cash: 8140XNEERING CO MMI1T.$ : 80B 91 43 0 s. 0 •1' . x Cat ,�I`l a.�� =�', a�7t The subdivider shall furnish to' the C y ':a gists 'an cert1 b tamized imprc�voment ` estimate, ��. to assist the City ngln c�.vi�. engineer, ,. of the er fot ante , as surd ,ce calculating the �ai�aunt 1� subdivider Shall not cause termination of nor alto ► ` C The first eec��ed irati. o ? of said guarantee i ithout having \` , tten authorization from the City.. and Ftecc rding i r} E1.E��''�IOl`�' �.$ .160 l90 riling ithin 60 Guys of the City review and approval, the ' plat to the Couxrty for ' � a1�. submit the ��ia .. applicant ; s�i� signatta res of County officials as required by ORS Chapter 92. v final rec:�rding with the 'County,. the applicant shall ,��n nal•. submit to the, City a riylat Copy of the recorded ;�. plat. SECTION 18.162.080 Final Plat Applicatiori Submission Requirements Three copies of the p rtition plat prepared by a land A. surveyor or engineer licensed to practice in Oregon; and necessary data or narrative. 3. The partitiau plat and data or nary tive shall be drawn to the maninnuan 'standards set forth by the Oregon Revised, statutes (ORS 92.05) , Washington County, and y the City of Tigard. SECTION . 162.3.10 Centerline vionumentat .on « H[Onth ent 140k �.� •, B.equiremeft on for all ume�atat�. - '• Part�.ta�oxas . A. Oenterl�ne Mon Major ..- � oad�a�`'� rights'C2f.- 1. The centerlines o.� ._.,. street and r ► �• �a3.:� x way shall be menumented as prescribed in 92 060 (? ) befare City acceptance ep t ano e of street improvements un er the f s l .bw ng Sp e cif &cations z a. Centerliw' mor untents are required to have monument boti .es confo L Iing to City standards Set for those Iliontintents within the pat ` ment area; arl;. b. The tops of all a n.toriurtlent box'as s tAa .l be set to shred pavement grade FNOI EERIN' CoMME PS : SO BTTiTONJ 5Et .. .h, - SEcTtO T '18.164 STREET A1` Ll UTILITy IHPRRVEMEN,T STANDARD • 18.164 o 30 Streets 1. No development shall occur unless the " development has frontage or approved access " to a ptblie street • 'ut;ure E tens o s f St ; ec is and Reserve '$trips ; A reserve strip across t`ze end of a dedicated street shall. :be deeded to the City; and A i barrcade shall be donktructed at the end of b . the street by the property owners which shall . not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cOst of: which , shall be ittcluded" an the street constructicn cost . The City shalt, install all street signs, °relative to t t names, as specified by traffic control and street the City Engineer for any development. The cost of signs shall be the 'responsibility of the developer, . Street Cross Sections: Q4 S urfaco material shall be of Class C esphalt:.c concrete; b. The final lift shall be p1aded on all new construction roadways prior to City final acceptance of the roadw ,y t however, not before 90 percent of the structure0 in " the net. development are completed unless three years i initiation of have elapsed since �:x1�.ta.atioin in the development. c The final lift shall be Class asphaltic concrete as defined b y A 4 P t► . A : standard specification vo.� lift sha � �, be less than 1' 1/2 inches in thickness. • i8 ,64. i2O UtJlit ;es : l,. X11 utility .ines i��clu ling, but net limit Fed to those regtxs.red fcr a .ectr :c i mmuniCat Lone .ig i�:.rig r � and calbi television services and r l t d faciiit,ies shal i be placed undergrc�unor ecept fdr surface �.ed. transformers, _ eii+i nne pion �ioun,,. ~face r�ountec� oca bones :and •meter cabinets urich may 1 e p kc ed bcve • grou 'xd, temp•raty utiii'ty service f "ac :liti "s "s 'c ur Yng ENGINEERING CC ENTS: 8. �8 91 « .' S'i1E,°I4N/ Sits �y• construction, high opacity ,tlectvic lines operating' at 50,000 olts Or above. 18.164.130 Cast or Bond Required 1. All ixnproVements in tailed by the subdivider shall be guaranteed as to workmanship and inaterial for a period of one year following acceptace by the : City Council. Such guarantee shall be seclured, by cash deposit or, bond in, the as cunt of the value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer. 3 The Cash or bond shall comply with the terms arid conditions of. Section 18.160.180. 18 e 1.64.150 Installation: Prerec uisite,'Perc'+it Pee 1. No land division improvements, indlui ng sanitarY sewers, Storm sewers, streets b sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be underta] en exc plans therefor have been, approved ept after the lens the by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued,: 18.164.180 Notic'a to City Required 1. Work shall, not begin t nti1 the City has been notified in advance If work is discontinued n sussed. it shall not be resumrd until the City , a 18,164.200 Engineer's Cert i f i cat .on Requ; ,,red 1. The laid divider ' s engineer shall provide writt en certification of a form provided by the C; r that all improvements, workmanship and materials '. are in accord with current and standa� ; engineering and p if high grade, Prior cr�a�strlactx,�n x.c�lCt ces, and are '� ; the Cite acceptance of the subdivision's i roves ,,.,,. .. r � thereof . Aeration m any ca.7?,d maintenance. i p t, .��s�yt s o asv Portion Ghe�°eof < for o APPROVED: landali R. Wool , City Br,r,ineer CD:SUb91 M 13.0 D ENGINEERING COMMENTS: SUB 91-13 BURTO l' /SEiyu ..te TO: • REQUEST FOR COMdENTS Ayr PROM: Ti aid Planning Depantrrmot RE: D„112: �.. �� . p�� SE ?SI'ti'I S SEA 21:2003_, ^, LI ADO'S , -- s--' '� omit r' Ib�di riea ova preliminary ITV QE) R , „i1i ,,.�i d013��... ' "'fold S ITV a'INTERNATIONAL, /Pl 3e� (NPO e the ptua an appr al Of 'am area that; has bocome kplat oW fie Ph/i a US of the Siui it at Bull, W untain t�iu lv�i®ion. This appliCatir�t ]+�gvcs ,� Ph Vic `Svmeit� at n�>>f l Mountain ,��.r a 4.�ntf�ixesation of the review •oa Phase �3C of , tom® . .. into _X76 lots botlae anad. Development aul�dl,Viaricaira. The original n:'®:tr'iew r ®t ®ted„ 1) Suia,�livl,siont%P1ar� approval to .11ow 97 acres to be divided int n a progimately S, 0t; l and 32,000 square feet; 2) Vex f;Inc approval to allow increetntd lot With to . depth ratio on certain :'sots witrvre a ratio of 2.5:1 is normally reiq; rained; 3) a, Sensitive Lands nermi'w to allow del,velopment of 54 lots on slopes that: totdehal 250, grade, and; 4) two Lot Line M juatmefte. Approval was gra ntod Tote the "` Pbau .. method for a:Cceae to SW Bull Mont�nt�;ain Road n ©she �'�n 215 lobo and; r g . . - the was o�,1tt�.rt+ez�' by the Planning � r�aurri� iari and shall now be reviewed. Mao, tole avaltcaat requests that the Planning +Cammias►ionr apprcive aub pha®ing of what originally ref erred to as Phase II into seven suit - phases. ZONE: R -7 (PD) ( , Planned Development) LOC TXC:I: Bull Mountain Road sa.dentiaA• entn� at the pout)t, and the existing ... inus of SW 135th unite sore anti SW 139th A.�r �utl7<grn test ti „� u..��iv.,is�at. (WCTM 251 9, tax iota 102, 103, north edge ' ``f the u 104,tu2C 0, and 231 4, tam lots 900, 1000, 1100) ',Attached and applbd a1 n your view. Pam iti * cation Supplied by va , departments and agencies and fr+ Other information available ta) ouL Staff, report and eedommendationt will be prep cad and a dsSoillion will tte rendered on t'ho pro sal in the near future. 1f you Wish to �� ., application, We need your oorenenta by u2 , 19011. Lou May uae�the spate provided below or attach a separate letter to return your cO nte. ..�...-. l abl to res mtd b tt a above date , laill13e phoP the eta�.t,t contact P r� t at �_ u �. ��.�..�. - � p u in wrra�tit��j as Soon as noted Tuts _w' with your oortmenta and cOn €ire • our o went �,� any 2337 13125 �fr� Hall iIA,'�d. �� c�.e�an°d, OR '37 �8�e Tigard. possib .1. ' Planning .fie aar ��aent,, P® E" . aR o®[i ao 2;23. PHONE: �f you wave art questions c2in this in�►�:te s �e �r 639-4171. g STAY)) OMIT VLEASE cHEOX QT G— Sa THAT APP We have reviewed the proposal and have no 'old 6ct.iom to ,tionvo PLANNING �.: Please Contact of Our off' c as Alj,02 1, 1991. Pl4 atae re' a to the etiicloaed letter. Written Comments N of Person ettt ids Phone ' - l�Tte�r '410* ,x,11 EQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: .. e�...t .8 1991 Tigard Planning Depar ment , At: 9 0 3 » 11 E LY .- ,, s sta ir rB>�a �.� $ s. 9 t -000 ~---y ,� . u1 91 -4013. BUR .. N Mtn �� T (>NP0 13 ) The applicant requests 3Uhdiwi ®icon praliminarF finer p the area that 4 e �soor P1P , plat Planned, ��►p�ent c . �►�u�al Plan, a rival ®f �- ova known ad ph &see 110 of the Suzunit at Bull liountai& Subdivision. ,TIIiis . applicati is a continuation of the review of Phase IS; of the aUtuit `'at 8u11 Mountains Subdivision. .. The original review requeted; 1.) Stkbdi viaion,/Planned Devele*Aent aapreVal to a3.10w 97 acres: to be divided into 276 i ote JmtWeesn alpprarinieatel 8•000 and 32,000 s�nare fe d 2) Vag ian�e appro�ai to allc� an ,nc reaeec lot width to depth tatiO on certain iota where a ratiO of 245:1' is norstalty, required; 3) a Een tive Landa pelamit to allow development of 54 leta on alopeE that exdeed 27% rade, and; 4) two Lot Line Ad jUt okimite. Approval was granted for the t:� northern 21,5 late (1�h�t ) � �°� c � � be � e ].i. Mt�uiet�;�i�n �� ®ac's ee 1113 and the � for �► wa<� COftinted, by the .Planning coa ,i.�se�ion is ie►n all no �)a -p as weang of Also, was ia ifanl �r referred red to an Phnsea�.n a ZONE: Rt, -7 (P11,) use I� a►'ato Seven Ssat►,pha. ®Qaa. . (R, r°`'- elLo nt LOCATION: Bull Mountain Road a��p�., ( ��i ;niter acre, MAan�ned _�. � ,,.� .. i ) Re ddantia�i., 9 u and hl# 139th A've n.te at the south, and t edis ting eonthern terminneua of SW 135th avenue at the north edge of the �x�'1V inioa w1lit 281 9, tax lots 102, 1133, 1040 2000 and 281 4t, tax lots 900, 1000,11100) ia" tached i0 the bite Pit u and applicant 'a etatetent for your re'►ie�i. Froth information various department any° argen�ciee amid frost other i,�nfordta►ti.on n+��ppA�.e�d b�: .. and information at*ailable to our staff, a report and ratchitaendation will be prepared info d®ci afen *.iin be tonstered on the gxOjpoasal in the near futtcxre. If Fora *doh to 'Continent on thin application, we need your comae ante by Are► . 19, .1991. you may ided below or attach a eepa,rate letter to return your cotarteaate r Ube s apace p+xo .x ,_., p p a ff contact ou are ramble ,to. _re ®�iad : by than above date please phone the ataff below with your convents and confiriat yOur comteZ to in writ 9 e Boon ae . _...O Box 23397. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, OR 97223 d POONEA: pot iib1e I f you 1have any questions regarding din thin Matter, contaict the Tigard a Planning D�pat�t>a� , 639,-4191 STAFF CONTACT: J�'er offer_. '. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT , p2Ly 4 We hcive vaiviewed the proposal and have no objections to it 4 Please contact of our office. /Please refer to they enclosed letter,. Comments: fawiw«i6rii. ... . • > #ame of Person onnenting s .. ..:,� uiplb►er ,..�. �....�..jam- ..: pri r to i et ncc of building ermt,t3r a report f: tom a rigistered engi t, eer shall e bmitted. The report klhall indicate t o locati n o any fill placed on, bW.lding cites, Suitablity of the ;soil.. :)r ..inch construction and, soil ;bearing capacity. o Private storm drains shall r be provided as I items indicated on the plan- s for lets ="�a. eadexerts s ka ll he provided where crossing other lots. A joint access and maintenance agreement '6 all be recorded with, , each lot accessing private storm drain. As ollowed . Lots shall haV€ ao equal right to 'use and an obligation to . operatr4 and Maintain the private drainage facilitieP within the private or'public 0..rrainave easements as shown rr o The finish grade of the lots shall have a na timum slope of 2 :1 or the engineer shat certify the stabilit ► of the steeper slo ►Y . This will include the e elope a t& fail from the exoavation for the fct ,da t oils of the str xctros tr nh . i� TO REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE : 4uwus:t ' S, 199 , FROM Tigard Planning Department R1: SUBDIVISIO 91 -0013 PLANNE A LMLO aRE '"R59�. 00 3 SENSITIVE LANDS SLR 0003 LOT IDES ME s j H �� ..-' .�. , �. °.;.0.1.., ant i alzxu INTERNATIONAL WO 13) The applicant rogeaeats Subdivieion preliminary plat F].anned Development. conceptual plan approval of the area that has become known as Phase IIB of the Su Brit at Bull Hountain subdivision, Thie application i® a continuation Of the review of Phase Ia of the Summit at Bull Mountain sundiVibion. The original review requst dj. 1) Su ivisfon /Planted Development app�.bval to allow 97 a�:acraeu to be divided ,�,tc 276 lets between approximately dt0 ak io on certain' iota where a r io of 2.5:1 is normally requirced; 3) .. �3.dth to depth r , and 32, 000 agnate feet; 2) Variance approval to allow an increaa;e lot a Seneaitr,rre Lands permit to allow develeptaes t of 54 lets on slopes that exceed 25% grade, aand, 4) two Lot Line tad justments. Approval was granted for the pe� portt kern 215 iota (Phase IUD) Method for access to SW Bull Mountain Road � by g and tine reviewed. Also, the wa® continued b the Planning �mmaissiat� and shall now be r ®v appl.itrant reqUents that the Planning Oomta ssiam approve sub-phasing of what was EAO# ref ®l.'re�A to as Phrase rI into seven eubaphar�e!s. R -7 (�'D) - ) � ZONE: untain itc�ad (Re%�fident ial, 7 units /acre, Planned Deve) op tent TION• Bull rI Wvedaue at the north edge of the eubdlvisio nd (WCT'4 2S) 9, tax lets !.02, 105, ar SW 13th Avenue at, the south, and the rxi�tin southern terminus of SW 135th 104,, 200, and 251 4, tax letti 900, 1000, 1100) Attached is the cite Plan and applicant "s Stateatent for ,lour review. Prom information avppi .ed by varibus departments and agencies and from ether information available to our staff, a report and ree,tommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the neat future. If you wish Pp y . , by , 1991. You away to cm�intlesznz; �?�L this 2t l�.cati.onp' we, need rout ��dt[<1,.nt ®b Auer. 1 use the space provided below or attach a separate letter iturik,tAt3. "..rr. Ue.ta. - ,.,""..."" if: ou. are unat? a to r �:a nG$ tt .. the above iata,. p noted below with your comments and confirm your c+ possible. le. If you have any questions regarding th AND g C Hall D1 • BEAVE ;TON FIRE DEPARTMENT pia�i� De nt, � �o� 23397 � 13125 �,�a 639 -- 41:71.. STAFF CO ACT: er''ry gffer ,�„ THE THAT AI PLV �LEA+;Ft� CHECK Z� FOLLOWING ITEMS We have reviewed the preposa:l and have no Please contact of our i GENE E!RCHILL tieply Fire Marshall Ft,oc Examiner 503-528-2502 FAX 526-2538 4755 S.W, ,; ii iih Drive a P 0, Lox 4755.3eaverton, Oregon 97005 Please prefer to the enclosed letter et �-j T r dt 1,A.?ah, Written Ooaiunentsi s �.� � �'% t e- r 7` "' rt) 4 Waite of Perean Cc flenting Phone Nikmker: c� . Ji_ WNW t TO: REQUEST [ "!R COMMENTS ..' DA`,'E s h ° ::t'. 1991 RECEIVEu P ANMNG AUGI,5199 p'IMa Tigard Planning Department RE: � p irx x 1 � "` >. � 5`� r� TON S ix IN �.M (NM ) The applicant requests Subdivision preliminary plat tanned Development conc Pt u 1 p. approval of the area that has become known an Ph4tae IXB of the Summit at Bull Mountain eubdiv it on. This appiication is a continuation of the review og Phase II of the Summit at Bull Mountain aubdiviairn. The original review '°equnted; i) Subdivision/Planned v lopment approval �. + a low 97 ;Rosati to be divided into 276 lots between a, rozi aateil 8 000 an '. 32, 000 `4quare Feet; 2) Variance approvals to allot; a►n iYt :trreased lot wider S to depth ratio on Cer :ain lots where a ratio of 2.55 a 1 ie normally ; 'squired; - . n slopea t ]at exceed g nm3itive fan = r�tit tee a�i.low det►el,:. ��nt o�C �P4 �.c��.,a ¢� g^ ted for the 25% radeee and, 4 two Lot Seine ,djuctt�ea � Pe nie . A ro�ral wan saia northern 215 .ots (Phase IXB) and the Me hod for =ceaa to Bull Mountain Road Waan continued by the Planning `=o nieaion and st -4,a11 now be reviewed. A10o, the applicant recuecta that the Planning Com mission, approve euh ..phasing Of What was on inally referred to as Phase II into eeve n. sub .phanen. ZONE: R-•7 (PD) (Rcaidential, 7 unitejacre, Planned Develo ht � a uin Boad and SW 139th Avenue at the south, and the existing h® ter nu of SW 135th l� ��u2�''�A� aand 251t�, � L ��► 90® subdivision. 110 ©p (1�1 � e 1 ®Z, 1ia3, CTM 2S1 9, mat lot Attached, is ® an pp licant ° e ntAterent for y Cur seview pxr� infOraatian sup lied b y �� e� depar^ tmentS and agencies and from other initoraaation available to our staff, a report and recd endatiertt Will be prayed and A t com ent�In this appli. ation we need your comreents by Au ,p 19; �, yoo wmay cal in the near futtir e I yauac �, ''You mn�ay un e the a ace rovided belood are o r a ttach a eepnre a le t ev to y If you a .e unable to res v t e a Gv .�. � a.. P ease p hon t) a st aff con mac t o 1 aw wi th y our cOmaent a an d donfn otr c o s c in eritinr� er e soon as pladible you Jy qu , 1 5 g ..d' g this matter, contact the Tigard aning Department, Ps Solt 233973 12 SW Hal 1 1bd. , Ti g ard, tR 97223 4 PNCNE: 639 - 417 :. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry o!fer PL EASE CiDECIC T FOLLtB'WIING I TENS TI3AT APPLSt` e We have reviewed .the prr r A cal and have no ob jectioiaa to it. a Please contact Y.,ma', Ai i itch+ .' . of ouY` offic . efer to the encloc e si ].ettur a �� Please r written C "I" Name of Pe ri on C.. i=a nt � ahoihe Number: 7 , N a� • •, • ' TO: t 11ECEIVED PLANNING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AUG 13 1991 DATE: Amt 8 1991 FROM: Tigard Planning `Department RE: SK tSION 00x3 wAI °� D CLOPP �..p o -� 05_ ,_§.tZT2i!5e . _ S SL AMA LOT LIM JUST ITT I�dls 9 ,ell 'ClAR ,91� - ®A1.3 �` N =EITO 91»�yRN3 ,� of the assy plat TION nn ( ent )cone �te a� plan approval area that haisibec The applicant requests Subdivieioa preliminary p � l�le�.ne�l Development k� P vision. This a npp1Lcati.spsss as Phase YIS of the Summit at 1B>ali, Mountain subdivision. ,- Lu a continuation of the review of Phase II Of he Sun&t at Bull Mountain subdivision. The original review requsted /J 1) Su $ivi Bien /P1anned tvef eloprnent approval to allots 97 cres to be divided into 276 late between approximately 14 4, 000 and 32,000 square a feet t 2) Variance approval to allow an increased lot Width to depth ratio on certain lots where a ratio of 2.6:1 is normally required; Approval that' exceed 3 �,1� a Sensitive La,srrs'1s permit to allow development of 54 lots ��e Slopes q>rs>sats� gar the ��°',, 5�+1 graral E , a>Ifnd, �h) ° two Lot Line Adjustments. northern 215 lots \\Phase IIe) and the method for access to sti Bull Mountain Road was continued by the Planning Comatiosion and shall now be reviewed. Also, the applicant _ requests that the Planning Comm&sei+on approve sub - phasing of what was originally referred to ae Phase II into seven edb- phatees. ZONE: R-7 (PD) (Eesidential d 7 unite/acre, Planned Development) LOCATION: Bull Mountain Road and SW 139th Avenue a t the, the south, and the exiestissug sOutherri terminus of SW 135th Avenue at the lots 251 9, tax north sage of the subdivision. ° IFiC is 102, 103, b �+d 104, 200, and 251 4, tax lots 900, 1000, 1100) . � applicant's statement for and view.. From inforr, ation supplied by various pdepartetente and g other 1�tt�nch�d is the � Site k�l�an _ .. rs srmendatl.on will be pceged information available to our staff , a report and race► and a decision will b:: rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aa .19, 19j1. 1ou may provided r attach Bove arts ommenta. .. . separate letter to return use the e�pa urn i below ihb the ab ,_ s. please phone �" 3. st f contact . . s nfirs your comMentssk�in®ritingaaas seen as st ble. ' S any qu regarding . atter, contact the Tigard Po _ comments and sao sated belo�al£��sa hag ®ca. esationsa � a 1 Rlv�i.� Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: Planning Department, PO Bo 23397, 13125 5'W Hell • g. 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerrr r. Offer PLEASE CHECK ''HE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPL a p p ✓'� _ tea it 4�°. objections we have giev3.ecv+~zdl the r® a�s�a1. �d have ho obi �r3c#�i 1�. Please contact: of our Office. ::..� 1_. Please refer to o,. ; .,. the enclosed letter. Written ci ail me to v ',. exoA C. Ocot 1.02_,E21 y . 7 fit Al ro ,' '' P eating Ns� of +ar�►a�in �]�a�1nm dJrVarffl... _ :1.nl...mem....rniate.,..._ �� Pho»e Nus�er s ..�,.... • 1.0A is A REQUEST Win COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING AUG 1 3 1991 ?ATE: ltttarul t N 1 991 ,r.C.rw ,, Tigard Planning Department., RR: jj ' ipl . 9 A 3 .44 A fyR . PIiENIT PDI ,, „ VAR 9� 1 rY ��R M�.+r rs.y • X31- 0Ci ©3�.._,:� �„ -0013 .. I' TP (NPO #3 The axrp »id regaaeste. Subdi'ieioxt pre1l. i,t ary a�asT��rar �� !� ca® � pleat Planned Developrent cOnteptlital ply itpprOVa1 of the area that has bec known an P40ee 113 of the Sumtiit to:t 'fall *detain eexhdivLeie n. %ibis appiioati on is a Continuation Of the review of Phase 11 O the Susu►nit a at; BUll Mountain a �ovs�l to allow '97 scree to iww - �eguuteds 1) Subdi�riti�en�/Plannodt f�en�lo � n�: suh�ilvieic;►�a. • The original r ®v be divided z nto 216 lots betweo4t approxima ely 8, e00 and •32, ®0O square feet v' Irari_ 7 lot 1 pence approval' to all�v � ..increased width to nth ratio ores certain .lots wherar a ratio of 2.5 1 i3 nOr'malt .y r��eepuir'ed; a a .Sensitive Landis permit :,\ allo W develu nt .of 54 lots oft elopes that, exceeds 25% Vide,' and; 4) two L t Line hdluetga: nt r. Approval was ranted for the he method for scows to SW Bull NOuntain Road northern � ?�,� lbt® (Ph�se� 11B) and t VMS contiuned by the Planning Colau scion and shall now be reviewed. AlsO, the to lic &' a n rota Seven a . rove subs- phaGing of what was originally refer ed to ass Phase iI O even sub - phases. ZONE: Rt.'1 (i0) g (�sident��, aal , �' units /acre, Planned 1Developane it) LOCATION: Bn1 . Mountain Road and Stall 119th Avenue at the south, and the wasting southern terminus of SW 1. 5th AvenUe at the north edge of the subdivision. (WCT i 281 9;, ter* lotf� 102, 103, 104, 200, and 201 4, tax lots 900, 1000, 1100) Attached is the Site Pl � n . end � a enc�e a � -and v�r� other ' �' iew. info ttion supplied by vari. p g Information avaa,lsble to our staff, a report and rec r endatiayn Will be prepared and a decisica n Will be rendered on the paro);;Netal . in the near future. if you wish to Comment tin thus application, we need your comments by Dt 4 9, l99►1. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your cotmaentS. notediD�ielc�w with aurrosaaameRts�ar►deo�fia�a ac�ur� corease hane��e staff Contact le_ , , p P ter, contact thee Tigardr Iii ��sii�le. � Y.. _ any � egaicding this »net ., Plantain Depart lent, Po Box 23397 ®13125 Sri Hall Blvd. , Tigard, OR 97223. Pf0NEt X639- 4171. STM'F' cONTAC ".c' : a'i'erviv Offer r .. PLEASE CHECK THE to 01,LOWI +IG 1T21 5 T}IAT APPLY ys t e leave reviewed the prepOb al. and have no objections to it. pie se contact of 'It.' office Please serer to the enC osedi 9 t'�er Written COmmentss' ::...._ . :awY.Ir:,.u�w�i.ua.�if1 ..i......rr PROM: ENS'1T 'VE 0 TON Name of Person C® mentinge Phone Member: . «: REQUEST 1P. mamas DATE: u TO: FROM: Tigatd PlanninC Department PEI , VISIO 9 0013 "' 'SLR LxR 9 R r LIMB ADJUSTMENT . ra The appliCant regeeta 5 ::` divieaioa pre],imiV ary ATY1�N�►I, (ice s') etteept n1 rain ap provea,:1 of 'k.' area ,that' haze OWe �aXaat Planner' Development � p l,.�,n ali��at�. ®n �Stte ae' �'haaa� ��' �f the 8uait at . �� gMa�u I� � ®f �h�� Sum ] t ate ,,'�u1]. Mountain Ls ce®natinua' ion ®f the review of L subdiViitiony The original review requetet]s 1) Suti:dilvifibf /Planned ,Develepfteat �oximateal rova1 to. ;al.lr sa 97' acres tc be divider'' thto 27& ,ote between app Y +rPP t to a111caw min inrrc�aeed �, ®t 6, O00 and 32, 000 square feet; 2) TYariahae approvaa,l :Lets where a� ratio .5 1 �.®a crtatally require! Width to cite�;pih ratio ort certain �. p� ratio �'.� � e�oe3ed ) . ®. a�x►ta. � App ^.�rcavaZ /wrae� gram that t Linea Md u t 'granted for thee rr pat � �4 1e�t� an sa +�ap$s _ d Was a .b5enss.e�.ge ��.�►� e' permit to a].le�W devea�.e� nt of ta3.n �oa� �„o graft, t L 3 iorthern 215 �.ot (Y�hafle .RIB c��P:easanthii .snr� teethed aahiai1 now h sx reviewed.: Zlee , the,. a e/ otnt request': that the P1aiming Cow tiaai0n app7Zovd Sub-phft oi.fg of what was / " _. / t �haa a®.; a R�9 (PO) ) orig1411f referreel tc aa3► Phase 11 into s even eu&i< , �, ZONE: (Reaidentiald 7 unl.ts/acre, Planned Deve/opment) LO•tltiT1AIl1 * Ru11 Mountain Roac* the .south, 2S1 termini:® of MN 135th and SW 139th Avenue a!'c and the eac3:>eti� Horst o2, 11D3, ' g nn } the �x�►rth ed, �e +�f the ®ub �� a �ad�� rG'TM4 t�l �b 0 tax lots A *venue a�. t ) 104, 200, and 251 4, .tam lets 900, i , Brant s . eatattMent fo,e your revi. . Prom Attached i.e eue, Site Flan! and app other, various de artMente ara _ are . rt and aecnnoie oxmatican pp13.e�d by illation wile. be � ®pa�.�ed t infearinati ®n_ available to our eta£f, po teeh and a deo�iai.oT Wi.11 bey rendered on the proposal in the near future If yon w �. Aiva� �_�].� o Z9�. You may t.o oaa en�c oe this Rapp] scat -ran® we need your: ara# letter t® return ye�ur eye Q ma. um9 the apace provided below or attach a Separate �leaee� phone the e3taf f contawrt Inre� uriabl.a� to ree��n � _ta�� ae�ye date._ _.. � � , r ,.. � regarding ihi»� matto;� °, , �on�a�ct gas , ... :is 9i the Tigard noted bel�a With you, comments and r,onf ir"em yorag Corralente _in writ ng an coon P:.s�;e3.ble. If you have any c�e�ost .. f ,� r ' ar 23 a PHONE? an�►i.rar� Department o P® Box ��:1'97 r �.�112�a 561 15si.i' P61.vei. o c3 1439 4171 a :+TAVF CONTACT aerrJLOffer :,:�y,_..,..,. ,-.- PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITER$ THAT APPLY: tie bait reviowf3d the propozai. and have no ob jee tiosa to it e Pl,e iage oot:tact of ou' office. Pleatae refer to the encicaeed letter. W itten e®mretents s NcaMe of Person .....� en t+L.CE S Phone MumbeL . 1i 3 65 IdicirgrA • 6 ... �.. ... ..,..: wed AcfreAN I. 1 • • 0.1 • y •etropolitafl Area Communications Commission Cable. TV Franchise Regulation 0 Tualatin Vaiioy Community Access (TVCA) 0 Public Communications Network (PCN) RECEIVED PLANNING AU(121991 August 9, 1991 Jerry Offer Tigard Planning Department PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97233 RE: Comments of Metropolitan Area Communications Commission ;.: on the Summit At Bull Mountain a- Phase 2 B Project Dear Mr. Offer, On behalf of the Metropolitan Area ComMunications Commission (ACC), I want to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Summit At Bull Mountain - Phase 2 B Project in the City Of -'a Tigard. ,•. MACC is a cooperative aq envy Made up of local city and county .7 ,p govern ntss i.nciud. ng the City of Tigard - for g tre purpose .of authori ping and monitoring cable television service throw hout . :ry works to ensure that the best cable TV the Tualatin Palley, , MACC � ., s�r��.c,es are. made available to the 16 communities it represents. In addition to franchise regulati-)a, M. Ci` provides locally produced cable programming through Tualatin Malley Community Access (TVCA) , and promotes the use of the Public Communications Network (PCN) tr' In review of this project, we have two Major concerns: .y. 1. MACC re2" iEllllS ends that the developers inure that the the qu it at B 11N DI4t,untain �- Ph goo 2 D Project :• "' , � re��.deut� � � cable ... e 9 a�a3.1�.®r to th have fra�Tchized cable serif c • Franchised cable servi ce - is regulated b y MACC on beha l. :r: of the City of Tigard. Standards awe established fr Customer Servic e, Technacal Performance, repair service. MACC's job is to assure compliance with thesestandards m �.� . ., . The franchised xanchised cabl a television provider for or th e project roject A r e. a is Columbia Cable of O yegon Columbia provides cable televisiOi servic e to over 62 �. oers in Washington anc CiaCkaMas counties, and is capable02' meeting the nee d s of r si dent$ wishing t o receive cable television ser v1Ce . it more than entertainm nt; it includes Er�tinchsed Gabble serrti�r, aMM� • �.. � nt prograMMng; anc�, ity oriented p g ngc local government community Programming, This rogramming is an important l r� � � g Th�:s p .. ��..�diacatonal pro �h � y ' t� �:b u�� A�"ai„ ugh info�mat�.onaZ link to the communa.t. d i.. • i __ c. .�..�v� aa"il sea �i!°64i!!4 F91d 7hd cthedf telovia &7 pitilidit g service s!tr'e 1980 1815 NW 169tFrPlace, Suite to 8020 0 Seavortbh, tiregoh 97006 -4886 e 629 -8584 Or 220-0689 as FAX: (508)848.8551 Re reseriting the cornrnl+hities of Bank S, iledVertoh, ^orneiiUk, but-hams, roreat GioVa i a tt611, U O ho 6° Kin g City Lake Cswego, North Plains, kivergrove Shorvood, Tig�,d, T�adiarh, Washihg#an Oo uhty, and Uil sonu I ,. ..,. . .+...:. . Examples of such programming include Tigard city Council meetings, W'ashr.ngton County Commission meetings, coverage of local events and festivals, and cor mun .ty college teJ.ecourses . d is strongly committed tc its citizens having The , City of 7C �p �" this �Pr©graa�m3.��c� access to 2 . The dvsoors should notify Columbia C"Le in advance its to when opened trenc4le will be for alectac .city and telephone aarvtoe, so . Columbia stt 1l cable; most efficiently his w. ll save the c6MPanY - a+ney# aAd tedu'Oe CoS'Es tor all Cllumbia' s subscribers. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. SincereN1 ! ' aosh Silverman Consumer relations Coordinator • Ia0 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 40040/ ,cam 43#X040 _ / LIP '� �' 09 . 90 _ 90-0004 / VAR 90 -0009/ S'1 NO: _ SUB 906�Q ®05 / SLR .... -��t�d � �0 PDR 90 -0005 en, 4)6Lor FILE TITLE. BURTON ENGINEERING & SURVEY aPPLICAUTI THOMAS BURTON OWNER: SSIYU INTERNATIONAL 1194 8E PACIFIC. HIGHWAY #302 1070 NW' MURRAY ROAD y PORT/AND, OR 9.7229 �,I(�A�.1+a 3� 9722 Pp a u a Subdivision prel it at ��ull M /Planned Developsent conceptual plan approval of Pit REQUEST: The �� lican�;� re eat Phase 2B of the Summit Mountain dub�lvir�iore. - application a'contiauatior, of he revisw of the SumMit at Bull Mountain aubdi ian. ;1 Subdivision /Planned �Levelopnent • ' . The �a�r�.�inai. ,�:evi.�w ra¢lucat�� 1) to allow 97 acres to be di;;rided pP ately approval between s rox� 8, 000 and 32,004 square feet. .tea► on 022) L V iaince� approval to anew an <increased lot w.i.dth to depth ratio on certain lots where a ratio of 2.5 :1 in normally required,, 3) a Sensitive Lands permit to allow development of 54 lots A4 � slopes t .xceed .;25% ` grade, and d4) two bodied n i :'. d znt men . Approval was on eh► � �h�_ g nor t� rn 215 1 p plat. southern 58 Data Phase 2B) and the meths��! for access to SW Cs9naid�xa�ti�on of the � ( ➢ � : . Ru �l Mountain Road ware continued Eby the Planninyg Commieeton and shall now be reviewed. 'I . 'Non„, coMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ` MPQi NO: 3 ,, CHAIRPERSON: Herman Porter • PHONE: a 639?i0895 southern fermi au® of St?? 135th AvOnue at the north at 8ubdiv✓i ®ii; existing i,oan n Road an4 SW 139th 3v LOCATION: Bull Moasntai. � 8n1.�ih e (MOTH 281 9, tax: lots 102, 103, 104, 200, and 2s1 4d tax lots 900, 1000, 11,00) ZONING DESXGN ?TION: R-7 PD (Ueaidential, 7 vi-li,ta per acre, Plannr.3d Development) .ent p� ) sTUC �tX NI��18sIQS DATE C64O, 3/91, T " 'R "213,. HEARINGS OFFICER DATE ....�.,,...f c REQUEST lCOMMENTS t h�1 list) RETURN BY / ATTACHMENTS: VICINITY LANDSCAPING PLAN /. ` OAARATI`i ARCHITECTURAL PLAN Rif SITE PLAN STdVF CONTACT ' ,PtURS6iPT a Jerry Cif f "ter PIE ARE FOR OtANktA APPROVAL v gg t OTICE 'TI PROPERTY OidlNE 3'O BE HAILED Xc tDVERTISE NT TIMES /. /, Ok;EGORtAN L h TTER ACCEPTANCE 0,. �PPLIC iTION ; TO ACC A NTS i I CO ..g •" 2 1�1 , 3.1.1, 3 4.2t 3. .. M x 1 .2 . . . r � . 4 . , J b n 8.1.1, 8.1d2 8.13, 8%il Mtn. HdommunitY Plan °O0E SECTIONS:. is: 18.51 4�, 1,8i.8 ®, 18.92 �»ia.1 o, • 18.150, 18 b 1'!62, 1.8 154 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO SUB 91-0013 / SLR 91 -0003 / MIS 91 -0007 - PDR 91 -0005 y a„:„TtidatA4.4)/)1,14.5',(, FILE TITLE: iBURTD `� �?�RV APPLICANT: THOMAS BURTON OWNER: SEIYU INTERNATIONAL 11945 SE PACIFIC HIGHWAY #302 1010 NW MU ?iA ,° ROAD TIGARD, OR 9722:3 PORTLAND, OA 97229 VAR 91- 0013/ REQUEST: tu conceptual plan a� approval requests area that ipzaalhecca�eY3ci known aL�annga **evelop�aa ®nt Phase 2B of the Summit at Bull Mountain subdivision. This application is a continuation of the review of Phaa S of the Sumgait at Bullountain subdivision. The original review requeste g 1) Subdivision/Planned Davelopenent r, pproval to allow 97 acres to be divided into 276 lots between aPProXimately S, 0C 5' and 32,000 aq tare feet. 2) Variance approval � o allow an increased aE egdu lot width to depth ratio o certain lots where a ratio of . 2.5 :1 is normally required, 3) a Sensitive Lands permit to allow development of 54 lots on slopes that exceed 25% grade, and 4) two Lot Line Adjustments. Approval was granted for the northern 215 lots included in the preliminary plat. Consideration of the southern' 58 lots (Phase 2B) and the method for acreas " o SW Bull Mountain Road was continued by the Plar*nAng Commission a:nd shall now be reviewed. Also, the applicant requests that the Commission approve sub -- phasing of what was originally referred to as Phase into srib- phases. LOCA"LION: Bull Mountain Road and SW 139th Avenue at"" south, and the existing southern terminus of SW 135th Avenue at the north edge of the subdivision. (WCTM 251 9, tax lots 102, 103, 104,e 200, and 251 4, tax lots 900, 1000, 1.100) ZONING DESIGNATION: R -1 PD (Residential, 7 units r„.© r acre, Plai33rne•;cl Do°Velopegent) cominurNSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential NPO NO: 3 CHAIRPERSON: Herman Porter PHONE: 639 -0895 STAFF DECISION XX PLANNING COMMISSION DATE 9 23 91 TI: 7 i ADO -- HEARINGS OFFICER DATE T IC -- CZTY COUNCIL DATE ��__ TI ME : X9 FOR COMMENTS (ae® attached list) RETURN N BY _,/„_,,, — _r rte. ATTACHMENTS: XX VICINITY MAP } LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATrVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN XX SITE PLAN STAFF CONTACT PERSON: Jerry Of!gar PREPARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL: XX ADVERTI sEMENT TIMES _......e ;ia OREGON/AN. / /:.. / �. OREGOa _ . LETTER OF ACC PROPERTY ' OWNERS TO BE MAILED / /' X NOTICE TO E19TANCE OF APPLICATION /--/-:, ' al•o � YYi -- NOTICE TO DLCD - ATTACHMENTS. ONIONNO COY HENSI V E PLAN „, POD+, .LIES: 2 e; • 1, , 3�0' 1 4 S 34442, 3 i 5 21.1, 7.4,4, 7.6.1r 801,14 1.3, Bull .Mth. community Plan `. CODE SECTIONS 18. ra'4r 18.80 i 15.92,°, 18.15 10.160, la'.1 w2 r l8.164 tit r 1 � 1 BURTON ENGINEERING AND SURVEY CO 11945 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY 1302 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH (503) 639-6116 FAX (503) 639 -6117' March i,5 -p 1990 D u '1-41 SCERVIEh MAC 16 /990 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. NARRATIVE TO ACCOMPANY PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAT "BULL MOUNTAIN SU MrT VIEW ESTATES PHASE 2" The propose0 subdivision - �� u p 1 and extends from pha's e 1 w h ichlies southof existing S.W. 135th. Ave and extents south to Bull Mountain Road This proposed subd ,vision area is approximately 97 acres .and c on tain s 276 lots. This proposed subdivision will be constructed in conjunction with the phase 1 portion . Construction of phase 1 ena��0will „omp lete the extension of 5.W. 135th. 7 ve . from S.W. through to Bull Mountain . Also the S.W. 132hd, g connection through Bench View subdivision will be to ' Bull Mountain Road. These ' streets are designed completed ry � � "� = designed to �t�a nox~ collector �. ec.toar � � aana�►�d.� � All l other streets are de;s � to local street .ste ;YUards. Considerable effort haz been made to work with individual neighbors, CPO group, NPO,group and City of Tigard Planning, and Engineering Departments in developing this plan. L; >t sizes have been planned much larger t.han required for this zoning ranging in size from 8,000 ft. +- to over 32.000 iota . 'r , for hillside .; Is um view and sq . ft. 'The have been des � � r�e�'t for 1�ra� i compatibility with somewhat challenging topography. Sanitary sewer is designed to for gravity flo, throughout. Sewer on the easterly portion of the project 11 onnect through the phase I project, to the existing Bench View subdivision. to 3 Mountain, Sewer recently constructed. The Southerly portion of tli : p to oexisting sewer. ximately 700 feet South ofdBul).M Mountain Road on located a ppr� �'' S.W. 139th. i ve. The Westerly portion of the project is planned to c )ranect through the proposed phase 3 and extend I to the 0 Road w i T3onno�rs. , le Power right North on t1- �- S.W. cholls Perry of wtar�d connect to an a�ntersectaor with �' existing se ter located just North of Schol is Ferry Road. Th. � rop o� drainage a storm a wa 1 drain to existing dra i nageways and calculations will be submi t ted with fi plans for proper sung of on and offsite :storm, foci l i t e. Street con;, traction can be maintainee,i with a +t laXi.muin of 12 grade except for the most we st i erly street in the project. We rer hereby u st allowance Of a 15 9 grade on this street, a � Water system is being designed at this time with Tigard Water Distract. They have agreed p .N. Ir L. • ��t,f Ili u v adequate water J . tipp l�r and we are working jointly ttr design the system. �� complex and beyond the '•e l imi nar layout. 1 e scope of�t�a this system is somewhat cc?t�t p P Trees are an important consideration for a portion of this project. `° /e request the Bull Mountain Co unity plan be to 2 disposition This plan requires .... t i n-.. trees be preserved at�lea�tt�50��of�eac� .ssa��,a�ran o� the trees. This durin p�yd "1 development. However, prior to development harvesting of. marketable trees is ,permitted in accordance with the Forest trees must be replaced with suitable Preservation Act. These t re 1 trees of at least 1 1/2 inches in diameter. We request the prerogative of being able to harvest these trees during the clearing process prior t o development construction with the under�stan di.n g they will be replaced as specified above. Removal of therse harvf.stable trees would not count in the 5U% n� ' �reser ia`. on amount as specified on the Wulf Mountain Community flan listed as item 5 under design elements. Lots have been designed to provide a building area with maximum view preservation and shrubbery. ' Trees, rva.t zon cif natural trees an .'.f e uniformly distributed on the northerly portion of this are uniformly project. The tree line and locations are shown on the topographic map Their are three major drainageways through this 5 N Their property. Lm� � have been . r desig n ed w ith extra depth to p reserve these area i n a natura l state on the back portions of the lots. ThFse back portions ons ar e therefore fore sloped more than 25% grads Also the len g th /width ratio exceeds the 2 1/2 allow ance applying sensitive permit for 25% on these lots as follows! Lots 1 slopes opee �. n thru 11, Lots 42 thru 54, Lots :2.09 thru 123. Lots 125 thru 142. We are applying for length/width ratio variance for lots 1 t thru 3, 'Lots 45 thru 52, Lots 132 thru 142 also request Va lot line adjustment to satisfy some concerns neighbors follows! . . ce requirements �f and're u�re�nen as the Northeast e the Southeast corner r Adjust T.L. 1 102 to accrue to T.L. 100 from th T.L. ea 100. This corner of '�' . Z . 00 , tp 100 on t . East side adds a 50 fot��. strip .of o:� land to T. These T'. L . s are indicated on throughout its entire length. map 25 1 9. An additional lot line adjustment is re q aerated. to allow 15 feet to be edded to Lot 1, Hi Tar (T L, 100) This would al lc i the addition of lb feet to the entire east side of Lot 1 necessary to allow the and This Bps to his y low 'the. owner acc T.L. 100 is shown �n map 25 1 9 foot 'strip would p be taken from T.L. 200 as shown on 25 1 9 map. TEL: 0503) 245 -409Q b (503)' 245 -4435 PAS (503) 245 -x.351 June 23, 1991 Jerry Offer City of Tigard 13125 S.W. hall Blvd. P.O. Bog 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Jerry: S e i yu. t y International requests that the City of Tigard continue with the review of the gngineering Plans related to The Summit at B Mountain " Phase 2E1 and the phased build out schedule of Phases 2A and 2B as submitted by Burton Engineering We appreciate the ass i have extended to us and hope that we can continue to work together ; to make this a successful project for all eoncernec sincerely, Lincoln Center 10220 S.W. Green burg • Suite 450' ortla.n re on 97223 ,s.ai roil u;: «,mow a„,�.._ �'i;�•''�_: BURTON EIRG .1 +' 'iRXNG AND SURVEY CO. lt945 ` SW 9ACIV C: GHWAlie " ' #302 T14l'ARb, ogntic* 97223 PH (503)639-6116 January 18i, 1990 kl,i ry Offer Chity of Tigard ,V10 Box 23397 13125 SW Hal Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 b , Re $ mmit at Bull mountain Ph se 2B, Preliminary r� I Herew proposed p e1iminary revised for the t�u above mentioned ,. roiect b This prelim nary was Originally ' + Phase 2 in late spring of 1990. The pzoect submitted as ,.. after accePtanoe by City of T_ igard to be continued anl resubmitted. We then resubmitted in D'4.�:ket 1990 resubmittal was reVieWed by Planning an d engineering and a comment letter dated December 27, 1990 was as returned to us. This submittal addresses the comments in the December 27 r �r. letter as f of lows a 1. Proposed Public and private e sanitary and storm sewer details --preliminary sanitary and storm serer plane are shown on this submittal. y .4 2. Proposed profiles of the road system-- Hoed profile plans . are also included on this submittal showing proposed grades and existing ground 3 vlcini ty map ry �as been included on these plans. AlSo lots accessing directly Ian , +o SW 135th have been e1. iminated b BURTON EN IN ,RING AND SURVEY CO, 11945 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY #802 'rXGARD, OREGON 07223 PH (5O3)539-611B July 29, 1991 Jerry ,offer Ciity of Tigard PO Bo t 23397 ; 13125 SW H,,411 Blvd Tigard, Oregon 972 3 Re: Summit at Bull Mountain Phase 2 8 approva `f . g � pr Phasing r of final � porgy �# r�n� c� exec ear Jerry: Herewith mail maps showing the proposed layout of t:he above mentioned project. We have previously submitted this for review, but this map changss the order of phmsihg for proposed phases 6,7 and 8 as shc'uwn herewith. We are r iguest °img to proceed with approvals as follows: 1 Approval of preliminary layout of phase 2 • Approval of pha 1ng as desiignated On the enclosed map including both previously designated phases' 2A and 28 with new phas-ing des gnatierrs as denoted an the included mop { 11945 SV PACIWZC 1 Z01N AY 11302, T1601.100 OttEGON : 91223 P (503)639-6116 January azy 181, .. 1990 eZ`t" `Offer City of `i gar'd PO Sox 2339 13125 SWHllDiva. T: and* Oregon 91223 `Ianunit at Bull Nount in Phase 2a and 2b We recently, applied for ap rova1 of phase 26 and also, for allowing phase 2a to be done in 2 different 'phases . pia e delay scheduling of hearings before the piaianittg co y ssicn for this request. The owner vents to reconsider his scheduling of the development pitocess in cooperation t it a th neighborhood and City's We will contatt :trot! .n the near fututo regarding the manner that wish to goosed with this protect so that it can be scheduled. cC Seiyix BURTON ON ENGIN EERIN.G AND SURVEY CO 11945 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY #302 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PR (503)639 -116 Apr. 26 k 1991 Jerry Offer City of Tigard PQ ;fox 23397 ' 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Summit at Bull Mountain Phase 2A & Dear Jerry Herewith additional requested 18 sets of preliminary Plans. requested for phase 22 on the 'above mentioned proieoto. have also dividing this phase u�estin ' , enclosed 24 sets of phase 2A �e�missic�n from the into 2 phases. The ®Winer , i`� req., q is phase into 2 parts. as planx�3�ng,+oi�msrcisaion to divide �, and 2��-2 b He proposes to, shown on the en.losed plans build and record phase 2h-1, then hase 230 and then phase 2A -2 The previous approval required Con trLctiOn of the street _gh phials connect with Bull Mountain , to p skin that this . taro load prior t thy. ou+�.. � occupancy of houseS in phase 2A. re asking e 20 t� os�nne p �; We el i�,).nated as part of this request. Phase 2A is� being � be served by two minor collectors from phase 1 of this project and also from Bench View $Ubdv s ion. are therefore regoestinc approval of Phase 2B, apprcw►a�. to divide a regLlirement divide: p�tase 2A into 2 phases, and e�.ininate the to collstruct the street Vonneotion to Bull Mountain Road prior to 0ccupanCY of phse 2A. Tom Burton toxn Burton Engineering and Survey y Co;, 11945 SW Pacific Highway #02 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mk. Burton; 1 am writing in reference to the recent submittal of Phase 2B of th Subdivision SUB 90-0005 known, as the Summit at Bull Mountain Phase 2r Both the City of Tigard Planning Dep artment and Engineering, Department have completed a preliminary review o f the subject application and have determined that the a plicati on as submitted as incomplete. are not found in the '��,� following items application ,packett 1) Proposed Public and private sanitary and storm sewer details 2) Proposed profileS of the road ,syotteu y .� map showing general location of the subject 3) ��o ��. �.� �a ,, s ��o�+a.n the gen property in at,ionshx p to arterial and collector streets and other developments In light of this finding the 120 day time for City's review � this proposed of development applications has not yet begun for City formally ally accepted this subdivision .e therefor -. the review period od the Cit:. has not application and the �. has not yet formally begun) . this review has identified ,n ,; ° the nevi approved d�.taonaa�,l'�s this preliminary n _ . Order a.nic�srnsaStea�cy �'�.�;h p �' � / p_. er f� Order ��q■i:or the Condition s�.�� of Final Summit at Bull Mountain. 90-10 PC for the previously aapproved Subdivision SUB 90005 states shall not permitted vehicular access directly ant the Lots ollector street from its intersection with Heil motajn Road to Lts i. ter'section with nchviewr Terrace. 13125 SWI -Iall Bh/di P;0 Booit 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (5o3) 639-4171-- The preliminary plat wh .ch has been suboitt for' Phase 2B w'� u1d permit direct access onto this minor co Uect r street zrom six lots (lot numbers $08 ; 313) a his de ign is- in digit . conflict volth the previously approved Pineal Orde ' w Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Department has stated that their conce :ns ertaa. p "nlng to this current subdivision applicatxon are the ► e . for the previous approval. Specific -11y street cades all no the ourreut application This also p deficiency in p �;�ater als in that street 3�n�� to a �e aide are not specified. ThetefOr'ev you may 1 •h to Itbeconsider the aodess Provided lots 308 - 313 during the time the above items b' ing prepared for submiSsiota to the City. If Yon have any t questions concerns Please contact the City o. Tigard Planning or Engineering Depar ent at 639-4171. son Rose va,,ir is t 3 relim All aapla.ctions shall be Cade on forum pi.oeided; shill be ;Itc %;ompanied by: Copies of the preliminary inary plat imia'. and narrative to (number to be determine4 at conference); ll ersons ten® ▪ � List r►f the names and addresses of a p Property ocoxners of t;',cord within 250 eet of the site; and • The required fee. 1. sheet size f!or the preliminary plat shall preferably not Oxceed ld inches by 24 inches; ; f� + ▪ The scale shall be an engineering ozale„ and Li.:eait ®ail ' �o one phaSe per sheet; g • The proposed ubdiviSi )n shall eotply� with ORS duplicate c resemble the name of any • a tar 92 send ash 11 not the » other subdivision to the County, us.l.ess the land' plat,ted i$ o s , - w ty that platted the contiguous t® and platted by the �c..�ma pay subdivision ision bearing that name or ' a , ess the applicant files and records the eOnsent of tb�► party that platted the • bd .v iS on bearing that name; Vicinity map showing the general location of the subject P ro p erty in relationship to arterial and collector streets; lo Names, addresses and elephone numbers of the Owner, er, developer, engineer, susv'e;{or, and d sIgner, as applicable; 6, The date of application ▪ The assessor's trap and tax lot num14:tr and a legal da scr ,ptioa sufficient to define the 1oc ► tie, a and boundaries of that �q. os subdivision; ▪ The boundary lies of w,he traet to bl subdivided ► The names of adjacent subdivisions or the nsOes Of recorded owners of ad .ning parcels of Onsublivlded land; io . contour iinet related to a City estat fished benchW rk at two-foot internals for grades t ero to teh percent and f t 'ee -faot internals for Zrades ever ten pei7cent, (within d ad: J agent to the proposed prcaposed a. Public ant private rights-of-war and . Public and private oanitaryt a d domestic water mains including fire major power (50,000 volts or transmission lines, and watercourses; e. Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and an y other lan d ent4mbrances Appeoximate pl .xn and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated and plats of the proVosed water diet : ,bUtion system: showing pipe sizes and the location of va,wes and fire hydrants; roe .terline profiles showing the finished grade of • Approximate Including ,tt ding street extensions for , a• reasonable all streets :,,q distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision; storm sewer lines, hydrants, as mains o better) , telephone and Sealed cross sections of proposed street rights-of inundation or storm water ). The location o x. all areas subject to overflow, and the location width, and direction of flow of all watercourses and dratnag eways 16. proposed roposed lot configurations, tpproximate lot dimensions and lot numbers • Where lots aq )e to be used n such lots. Each purposes other thn residential, it shall be indleatod p lot shall abut upon a public street, 17. The Iodation of all tri. ws with a a iamct er greater measured at four feet above ground location of proposed tree plantings, if any; The oxisting use of the property, including all Ong �andtaartat�� 1A t str>r�ct�arel and Pr ®sent. use of the structures, of which strdc4ureS are to remain after platting; Supplemental information including proposed deed restrictions, 1gd �nPp � proof of property ownership, and a proposed plan for if any, � Q t subdivision improvements; and pk,:4�;�.��0'T� of sib 24. Existing natural festvr es incltding rock outcroppings, wetlands, and marsh, areas. ion cannot practicably be sho^n on information rx�tat If any of the foregoing lat it shall be taco °perated into a narrative and , ,. Mary' tt�® preliminary application. .� Ord. I133� -a2) submitted With the ap p a }x1714. • s{1ryr•is ^tr!�0.4 "::,: •C V A b1:I4 AY -9 ' i. Id 1 "vd 44-:143 $44 d; VA, .I:GJ1, atV:.F.os:jr: -,tls "X nl it 1 44; r ;AAA 411+3/41 'k.a m._. . nr ('sac.....,r..:'C>✓.,..«.:.;�xa ;w6•.su.u.:9 x�:c,'J. 4 .I.c.r*r��casr ri a. '*- �.pa:4••war.+:. IJ•Y�N:..;I:nw'r., a.c t.>f�Y�t; " „r�rG:•:w 4 ,.L%:.;.,...:�4- .Ma,..:a;.:: dw.atNI J.1,...1.. Iw1:a.uY. ..t �. r;'. ..4 .., w .u,.•..J.>,a>`n..ca : xa,::.Kf- 5::,'..µ, ut;.:tM:+.7, x.aM9'::lwr..• 1 .....7:w:,i r ■4 , 4111, ii47.;:44\Cb+kxYFtr`Y441433..,. ar4 4I4;1'kAe.l. «$44l 4$4.44A aKJ 1, ri'•A +vx, t•,; ^ry. "444,444. 441..4, ..Y4441 I 4444x.1 1#7x1..3 Jkb ';/t9D+'.:'•ku;�;�ra'r1::�+: r. :.tc nn.m tiK.., rtf if . f . 7 1Tt A In ... .tAKI q A.4. k 44:_ . - j��I'V.7. ” ,D t',4 s�: 91+. D �t _ .IA.. ,u 4r- A „i ?Ir n'.�,.iG "4e4� tR' .t .f.... X.7 .a -. urrn a.r •INS uY,IN • t ...I ... . 3A,., *"'•: :it•S; „'.t_.IuL.�,, r IP.]V:.,,p,.,u' Fr., .., r•X.4.,1[tyG.,l e. ,4:6,'irr«a'• 4,+.IF, —4.4 .,—.,- 1.W ,.1. •i•I.Ul/ �] L !I�1,h4yyj1�/,,��,etly(rKAy,�1« !��+.7 M. � /`� �^`F'.�wl .}✓' .r. 4 �v. m :T._ :O 4 1,. .: ,l ...,.: A ..f..,. `,.S ,.r„'i,.l°.�,:+ r • x 4 :_ , ., k�a. ' r +µ....., X; hk.,■„'.1'.a R � •, r, -..� A ..� \r..L.� W Vt.: �i:. ...1 . -i' - I 1d • aIQ • >..r ....,4 -3. .1 �YSf �� 4a5'N'.,C.M .Nt, DIA •KG�.' nrf.,.R., .. .aY.♦;.- K,w•4iY7 A� w,.5v .i >.W .I.JMi .+.ti fF .l 44, . #AM! "(:t. 4, 1.w ,>Y"` V .�•.:.1 I 6ueoG✓','C ° «.,�.�,.. ,x,. q %�!1�.1 �.a; 76 " „ °- Tc4:"a xmrmt .,.., ra -i ,. ..l .NJ.,v .,, #at.,,y:, � P 1 . ,.. .i. ,,fr 1.� . , ..WLNi..,i ,...L»,4J 1w h!� "v 4 .;` dM r. v -: ».k . "' .l.. 1Y sr5f yYty14NJl 4 P+aJM i »:fYl ....Mv,tr , .1.K, 1K.a:k,ki 15: ut.vu :. tn1:" R 4 Ai. S,., 1..w..- ..X.tl�1.,v.J.'Mu..., 1 ,4dalfi7w �. 101, .. , .iwdr• liwav�. '�'";,"� e. , X:.t a, «NW.R F_A'.9 '� +., YC.?Yi'Y ...;:. � 'a' 444 ►.ca 11:v ",c A,. '.I!. e= .1irr'w•q.1,,.�,;.,..1 .4414:441: L ^. 4.:::'1K 4•W t... M..ik' `l{'..„M.. ACv :.:_:';,i a I 1'.'x':_4 .1y_ � I , I...i. 414 V.,x, 1-5. ..k,aa b +., ,,..,1 .Ali xlt.'A.•: 'mod ..I.G. .�, N ,7141 5 :I 44$13 144..44 -141 k ,_4444 .44!4 4441 .. �'. ,»Y•,..— ...:�,ii. .At.x Y.,1.....:: :.d 44 ...liwl s4_4 $4.44✓w.3 :3414 -1 44 4-4:..:411, 4$$11,:^,14',14 1X4.444.144; 7„J .a,..,44_4,. 1M44,1I4 $44 14- $1444 ': 1.«. ..Iw�h, 413 u.:.'7Y`!{ L$44- 441+•c. $4443 -. a, 4-$eu4a., ,x'14 ta'kvt wx+b:9”. 4U 4441 r Ai 5'.. x .44:; I•:t'i�..L +..>n. iX• 154^1,V 4.41,•.µb, waver ...ur+ .r.wuawms,,, aurmomgamr /.mayvw�x _.. . BURTON ENGINEERING AND SURVEY • C 11949 SW PAoI i.0 RIGI'iWAY #302 TI ARb,, OREGON 97223 PH (503)639 -8119 November 29, 19901 CYt'y of Tigard 1312;5 $W Hall Blvd. PO Box 23397 Tigard,Or. 97223 Attt f e4 th Li'den Rat Summit at Bull MQLntaln, Phase 119 Herewith revised preliminary plans fir the z is ve mentioned proJedt submitted for prel iminar Y oPPrcval These plans area supplemental to the original subm��ttl which Included phase' h ZA, 118 and phase III. The plans are the earns as the ear .• final submission except the connection to Bull Mountain Road has been revised to the West in ling with SW 199th•, Ave on the South side of 8u11 Mountain Road. Also the reconstruction of mall Mountain Road design is included. This design includes left turn large and bus pull out Plan. A traffic en y' giving the design g�ineertit�g report was made r7 requirements for this project and is included he ewith, The requirements for design particularly for the Bull Mountain Road Connection have boat) inc arpoh Oted in the Preliminary plans as submitted herewith. We have also submitted this preliminary design and traffic report to Scott King, Washington County. cot $ iyu Ir�ternat-ional t; Dc *eve Crowle', Shimizu fA W a� ar: �' "�. �� . •. ,:.. t. �a is tad IS 19- '23. 24. 1W 115- SCALE 1' =3OC' JUNE, 1991 Jai' N4.. 89 — 340 Ez. 403' 384', 249: 376:., /27-2 276 37Z 1!42; 29.. 298' "299' 30 CEP U I:NTER'NATION,AL, CORP. 0 S .. . GREEN BU RG SUITE 450. CRTLANDs OR 97223 30.5 302 304 N. =323 306 URTON ENGINEERING AND SURVEY CO. 302 TIGARD PLAZA PORTLAND, , OR 97223 PH... 639 -611 STATE OF OREGON County of Wa8hingtof City of Tigard Ding first duly sworn /affirm, on oath "141.A/L4 for Tigard, Oregon. served NOTICE OF PUBLIC ;BEARING F'ORe served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director 'Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy gPublic Hearing Notice /Notice of ExhIb t "Awl was wailed to each named attached list maned exhibit "B" on the said notice NOTICE OF DS ,ASTON as her - to bulletin board on the. day of in the United States Hail on the postage prepaid Decision) , of . which is attached Harked r ona at th a dr sn shown on the day of 19 9 r _„e e on po an appropriate att hed, was 19 ; 1 amd depoAlted bwo8.-an /af f irrn to me on the 1912L- :if day of Person who delivered to POST OFFICE Subscribed arid sWo _ ` _ _ ; . the aa day of rya /affaraa to me on tfi OFFICIAL SEAL_ M. JOANN HAvgs NFITARY PU Lir►.OROON , L► COMMISSION NO oaf '` S MY COMMISSION EXPIRE'S MAY Sf 1995 bkm /AFFIDA!1 B . Al ROTAR ,..'PUBLIC Or ORE My Commission Expires: a A CITY OF TIGARD Washington, County NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY PLANNING COMMISSION I o Concerning Case Number (s) :pus 91- 0_911 pLV QQ! L L'R 9.1 -0003 2. Name of Sex:: Ste_ Internat B.oxnal Name of Applicant: Thomas Burton Address 11945 SW Pac fic 02 City Ti axti State . Address of Property: 1axl1. 14ountain_ Road and SW 139th Avenue; at . the mouthy and the exietirnr southern terminus of SW 135t,E,,Aven t the nort)a edge of the asubdiv'ision Tax )bp and Lot No(s) . a 2s1 9 a.. tax, s 102. 3f93. 1 O 14..; g'00, and 1.4 talots 900 1000 11.00 Request: The aaat�lgcarat re sate Subdivision 'or�that has ba�.Jnn D�velot tern : conce ua�. lan a. royal of the area known a s h.ase IXB of the Summit at Bull Mountain subdivision. This , icatr' on is a continuation of the review of Phase IX of the SturI r Subdivision Planned Devel® ent alpprov.. sae, ds 1 Bull Mo� ntain s�ubdivi ®i� nTh�riai.nal to al]lsa►w 9'� s . to ;�a di„viile�i' into 276 lots between a �. 'o imatel 8 000 and 32 000 s aar9,„ieet V ariance r 'oval to aAlotrr an increased lot width . to de . th ratio on Certain h . relak d olo s2 5 01_ is norena�� l „ er sixec_g �,3, a lots where a ratio of 2 �:iee Land ®,�erneit iat of 54 lots on slo s. that exceed ads: and ° 4) ,two .Lot %i ane Ad Us Mar,.. Ax_ grovel was ranted lot the northern 215 lots Pha ccesei. to Ski Bull no Mountain Road was coirn edSb�► the P].a method scion and shall how be reviewed. Ai.sr ,. the apyal Lc3nt_:.. re a that the P1 araztiinsx CoromieS i o:a ZONE: t a' arie i.na lv refer red to . as se II' zato apxsrove ubM►has�ine� of 'what Watt seven sob hases3�,� :,_„_7 "'SPA) _.,(Res .dent ,,, lR _Units a� G_ ras nne d I�ev�lr'i,;psnent 6. A Approval as requested Approval with conditions D -niai 7. Notice Not oe was published in and mailed to: X The applicant and owners) The affected Neighborhood the require distance � Owners o,. record within Planaiiu7g Crg`an�.zation 9 X .. Affected governMental agencies Final Decision: TSB DECISION Ss= BE FINAL ON .octobec 9 1091 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision;; and Statement of conditions can be obtained from g1 d �e Tigard City Nntl, 1312 SW Hall, P� HQx2339 ?Tigar�� xego97223. 9. accordance with 18.32.290(B) and Section 18.32.37 decision in u ,y party to the decision may appeal. t � ) 3'�0 r�h�.ch pro�riries twat a written appeal may be filed within 10 days afttbr notice is given arced by h p may on City fOra e ad a d. the appeal fee ($315.00) and transcript s, (varies up to�a�a n..e sent. The appeal ma be subm: tied costs an must mautiwul of $500.00) The deadline for filing of an appeal( 1:S 3436 ve . 10. u.estione If you have aiiy queetiabnuo please call the City O 'I' ara planningDepartment, 639-4171. b$i /SUH91 -13 A g o•• CITY OP TIG RD PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO; 91-10 P A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS � APPROVES AN APPLICATION EYU SUBDIVISION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/LOT LINE � ST&ENT REQUESTED BY SEYIU I INTERNATIONAL ONAL (BURTON ENGINEERING, REPRESENTATIVE). The Tigard Planning Commission has reviewed the above application at a public hearing on September 23, 1991. The Cobrniaeion has based ite decision on the facter► findings, and conclusions noted beloW. CASE* I. SUMMARY or THE REQT3EOT. Summit at Bull Mountain subdivision, Phase 2B Subdivision SUB 91 -0013 Planned Development Review PAR 91 °0005 Lot Li a Adjustment MIS 91-0007 applicant requeats Subdivision preli a p. %Planned S�R.� : n _ r� - lot,. The ap a lot 251 Z,evelopdaent �icnta�i]Led plan revim�r to divide an eiaproxintel, 23. 4 acre site (WCTM 251 9BA j• tax lot 1500 and porbaon5 of WCTC 2 4, tax lots 1000 and 11P0) into 58 lots ranging in size betwae a 7,042 aqua feet and 1.9, 582 square feet. In addition, the Avopoaed ateeeLa eJ� wou ld include' Creation of a detention pond tra ' ,, 1 equeete Lot Line Ad ju®tmeht approval tee .rld t 1.5 The app�lioa�nt a� ®d. r foot Vide strip to the east aide of Got 1 of the High TOr' Subdivision (tax Lot' 100) fro a the weetern edge of the 1, tcel tel be Subdivider. applicant Ate._ went tin addition, the a pl• 1.cam�t reg<a+bsts Lot L3.ne Adjustment approximately 3,000 square, feet from baa� _ el asppro�val. to attach apPr 1400 to the o ®utB�sa�st in exchange taaa�� to be aubdivided to tax Lot 1 .:., _ _ ._ ' d or PP Y - ! e,eociatioch woUl se® „r.nn � 400 wl� n wvi:th', thg dedicated for public roasi � t a roxima�el 4, 5�0 �� `�uarg3 feet of i�'ax subdivision. The3 ptOposed development is Phase 2B Of the,SUMMit at Hull -toot atain ! Y on this 9G portion �,f '�h►ai��e 2 from the. Commieeion s Mai � 8, �. hemming to saubdivisimn. The Planninc Gotarraieeic�n continued the heating' alloW the applicant to �tedeeigs Phase 20 in response to concerns related to access to B 11 Mountain Road from the subdivial.of as 0611 ... concerns with nuraetcoue drive aye entering onto a collector street. caanc® . street. The Go ieeion approved the subdivision /Planned Development P rop osal for Phase 2A +a0 May 8, 1990. GonettdOtiOn of "e rasa, 2A has P+� beT; un but the plat has y et to be recorded. P Mo nta the subdivision into sever► LLca il" elite re' ests approval p _. g _PP "�� "' The as 2 A and 2N of the Summit at Bull phases. M'PLtCANT /OWEEM Se u International ( art . ii r.cnVolkenbenrg Lincoln Centex ..W ereenburg Road 102�r s SUit0 450 Tigard, OR 9722 REPRESENTATI"' Burton Engineering (Thomas Burton) 1.1945 Si i Pacific Highway #302 Tigard, OR' J722 ' sTAFF REPORT - SUB 91.0013/PDR 91.- 0005 /HIS 91/0007 .: SEXYD PAGs 1 • A ADDITIONAL OWNERS: WCTM 2S1 9B, T.L. 1400 Lem\h and Mary Zednik 13395 SW Bull Mountain Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 PLAN DESIGNATION: liedium Density Residential WCTM 2S1 9BB, T.L. 100 James A Barbara Beck 14005 SW High Tor Drive Tigard, OR 97223 ZONING: LOCATION: APPLICABLE LAW: DECISION: R -7(PD) (Residential, 7 untts/acre, Planned Development overlay.) North side of Bull Mountain' Road opposite -� , ppo itg SW 139tPn Avenue, between the High Tor and E a ess subdivisions (Portions of WCTM 2S1 . , tax lots 1000 and 00, WCTM 2S1 9BA tax lots 1400 and 1500, and WCTM 2S1 950, tax lot 100). Community Development ..ode Cbap;,ers 18.54, 18.84, 18.92, 18.160, 18.164 and Comprehensive Plan Polo ies 2.1.1, 4.3.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. A roval' the Subdivision /Planned Development request subject to conditions. Approval of the lot line adjustment request subject to conditions. II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS Sikes: Tax lot 1500 and the portions of tax iota 1000 and 1100 that r• ess. Tax lot 1400 is subdivision proposal contain approximately 21.4 • r . subject to this iurisa.i ybtly larger than 3 acres in nize. Tax lot 300 is approximately 20,000 square feet in size. Site location: Tax Lot 1500 and the remainder of the subdivision site is located on the north side of Bull Mountain Road opposite SW 139th Avenue. the parcels the High Tor Subdivision to the west, n Phase 2A Subdivision to Mountain FhassQ 2A of the Hul]. � east, g arcelss are located between the Three Mo,. The Mountain Summit Estates Subdivisi ezi to the north. Tai lot 100 is within the High Tor subdivision. C Existing uses. and structures: The subdivision site is presently vacant and coverel with short grasses, Some fill material has already been placed on rise Elite. Tax I.ots 100 and 1500 are occupied by ss ngle- family residences • 'opcs'ixnaphy and drain: The proposed subdivision site slopes: generally from the :south to the north and east, and drains through a drainageway sae ara i r g the Three Mountain Estates and iew subdivisions to the P g includes , east. The applicant's o a of the site currently under review includes ®ap that indicates that none y es slopess in excess of 25 percent. E. Suy:roundiriq ].arid riee � on relatively subdivision with a Surrounding properties family residences Primarily y . A • a the _ ... large southeast of s The Summit at Bull Mountain farmhouse rain ,subdivision the proposed sulbdividion :site. e iss located on .. a t�arQr mere tax lot ]. 00 to . , Phases 1 and 2A to the north are presentlY undergoing development, no homes have yet been built. g g piment Plan deaigrliff nd zoning: the subject site C m rehe ive Flr edi m �nensity Resident �,.a7� use by the City Tigard p. units /a� Planned Development ere, Ovarla ss..zoPrdper-ties Bto the east, north/ y) P n m notthesetr and northwest are -•. (Residential, 7 S, n0 s12',AFF REpoRT SUB 91. 0013/PDR 91-- 0005 /MIS 91/0007' SEXY" PAGE 2 IININESSAMINIMMIWUNIMMOMMISINEENIMMINP similarly The High Tor Subdivision is within Washington County and is zoned R -6 (Residential, 6,000 square foot minimum lot size), • Pro sal Suma,p The applicant requests Subdivision preliminary plat /Planned Development detailed plan review to divide the approximately 21.4 acre site (WCTM 2S1; 9BA, tax lot 1500 and portions of WCTM 2S1 4, tax lots 1000 and 1100) into 58 lots ranging in size between 7,042 square ' feet and 19,582 square feet In addition, the s roposed development would include creation of a detesratio,n pond tract. The proposed development is phase 213 of the Bull Mountain Suuraft Estates subdivision. The Planning Commission continued the hearing on this portion of phase 2 from the Commission's May 8, 1990 . *nearing_ to allow the a pp licant to redesign phase response to concerns related to aoceaas n h�ee 2B in re to Bull Mountain Road from the subdivision as well as concerns with numerous driveways entering onto a collector street. The Commission approved the preliminary plat/conceptual plan for phase 2A on May 8, 1990. - recorded. Construction of phase 2A has begun but ,.•, c„�u the plat hi�is yet to be The resubmitt &l.for phase 2B includes an extension of SW 135th Avenue from Mountain Road opposite SW 139th Avenue. SW 135th Avenue • • proposed to be �canetructed to minor collector ataavdards with 40 feet of proposed paventont within a 60 foot wide right-of-way. No driveways are intended to • except for +daeivewaya for propea ed lots 229 through 232 enter the sit end ea to onto an eyebrow extension of the roadway. In which are intended to enter on order to eliminate the need for dri vieways from lots 247 and 248 to . SW proposed Off of a side street 'leading to the rear of these lots. loo ts` alley is The remainder of the road system is a ,network of loc =1 thes g View ,Lane in the Three Mountain streets including connections to SW Alpine v E = tates aubdivi sion tc the eamt., SW Hi Tor Drive to the .west, and a street stubbed to tax lob. 1400 to the southeast. The preliminary plat proposes a storm drainage 5th and lull M pond 'en a on. pa square foot tract at the intersection of SW 135th � Mountain Road. In addition, a bus pull-out lane is proposed at this intersection for school bus use The applicant also , reegueets LQ � ®tLine 1 of the High � ®r ®suladi.wi.si.ona 15 foot Of (tax lot wide strip to the east side _ to L•a subd3.vis�ede adjustmea'►t edge arcel f the p This is intended # o eprovi a ,tax lot 100 continued access , to the rear of that provide parcel that is currently provided by a gravel roadway on tax lot 15004 In addition, the app licant requests Lot Line 'Adjustment approval to attach approximately 4500 square feet from the parcel tee be subdivided to tax lot 1400 to the southeast in exchange for approximately 3000 square feet of tax lot 1400 which would be dedicated for public road purposes in association with the subdivision. The additional right -of -wait area Will allow development of SW Alpine View ]Gane to, full local ctrs�et standards as . thin Three fountain subdiv h3ien. i�. cortnects� to the stub of tha.s� street wxt qu p p min plat, for phase 2A and ItaollTh'e lcant also re sate a paroval of s re ha g summit at 811 Mountain subdivision into seven phdoeea H Public .servic e an l; u .. _ .. - . � � g t 4�thin phase 28 wei draining to ei t either t ent to ®sewers in phase 2A, to e. ting l efiated d there was. to the nort Least , or to the .propo „ n orms g ... detention dram y aka a detent�.o t W and b 1,'� Mountain Road inters ctiona. The pond would pond at the SW 135th an � � ST 'p REPORT SUB 91 0013 /PDR 91=- 0005/MI8 9 /0007 SB1 h ABM ly • i drain to existing storm _ aewere in Barrington Heights subdivision ac=xoas the road. Sanitary sewers would be extended through the site froM Planned sewers in phase 2h, existing sewers in Three .) ou ►twin Estates ,subdivision, and a Unified Sewerage Agency sewer in the Barrington Heights is e* bdivision. Water lines would be extended through the site connecting to exis :ing water lines in the surrounding subdivisions. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The applicable approval criteria or a Lot Line Adjustment are foi nd in Cori ,unit y Development Code Sections 18. 162.060. The approval criteria for a Planned Develo . nt are subdivision at mare listed approval standards 18.80.120. ,/ q,� r TlA �'P �'�►�.ii i�uif� S► at Code Section 18.1.60.060.A Accordingly, the ro sal must alai be found drto for a preliminary be consistent with the development standards of F the following Code Chapt s . Chapter 18.50 (R -4.5 zone); Chapter 18.92 (Density Computations) 9, And Chapter y p • - subsequent development aX d of other Community i8 164 (Street and Utility Improvement Sta►ndsrt3r� Standards of to 1 to sub qu j site !Development Code rchapters may apply sub act the but are not applicable to the current review. The Commission also finds that Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 4 8.1.1, and 8.1.3 apply to the review of this 7.3.1, 7.4 . 7.6.1, _Pm �. �d din Community SuY�divi ®,ion /Planaia+d Development proposal as well as e Dull Mount, Plan. 1V. Npo & ACEN Y CCi 1NTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the propoda1 and of Pere the following comments a. PHASING The applicant has recluected that Phase 11, which is currently divided into two cub - phases, i.e. SUB 90-04 and this appUCation, be .. = p h rent phases. The applicant has submitted a re hasec� into 7 different rephasing plan. The Engineering Department generally agrees with the layout of the except regard � .'P ?dahand ®San 7. As new phase ,lines 3 cant,�the following' is ho 6 and �ha1s and 7 would proposed by the PP be developed: Phase 6 Leta 121 r 133; X40 25l; and 200 281 Phase 7 Leta 134 -'139; 260 - 273# and 291 295 she wain disadvantage tot s 6 there could his layout s that in Vhase - let r be an extension of a. local road t�.��,e� efit f an Out p . � A temporary i~urn&ro and.'would turnaround until Ptgra�� 7 3e cone 1e ,eCendedt that tht phai�e necesaa_. . eforse it ed. theref�are }3e .,. Thar. .. Uses be ad jtieted So that no street be extended fur{.her than isoH feet without as Outlet. b. STt8ET8 Access to the site is provided gran+ S. Bull fountain gold, whin . gt Y lassified ae a Major" �r.. . is a �ashf.n on dount. Road and is e STAFF ANPPR.T. S 91.0013 /PDk 0 ' a .... 1��0 ®5�!►i]CS 91/0(�A7' S�Iy0 .„/ width adjacent to the site. The exiting roadway has right-of-way (0-1). currently S.W. Bull Mountain Road has a varying rich air�ited i provem =nts. T°he existing roadway has approximately 24 feet of yhtivement with gravel shoulders and open ditches for drainage., Basted the applicant, it is recommended that the following ing �. lane. on the,. Traffic Impact Stud conducted b Charbonneau Eia Mowing elan®+ configuration be implemented along S.W. Bull Mountain Road: A. For the eastbound to northbound Left turn movement onto S.W. 139th Ave. f, a median lane with 75 feet of .,.tocage For the westbound to northbound right turn movement onto B.W. 139th Ave., a westbound right turn lane and school bus atop. C. .the applicant o a engineer has recor*nend that these ianea g and the through Dines be 12 f eet in width. Therefore, it ie recommended thatt a minimum the applicant be required to provide the turn lanes as reCnded in the Traffic Report and half street improvements in accordance with requirements net forth by Washington County. S.W. 139th Avenue is a minor collector Street that is the internal connection between S.W. Bull, Mountain Road and the subdivision. The applicant's engineer has subisitted plana for the street whicis: Meet the city's standards. In previous x eperts for this development (Phase's 1 and II), it was recommended that S, W. 139th Avenue have limited driveway access between S.W., Bul3. Mountain Road and S.W. Benchview Terrace, this proposal meets that e,tegdirement. In addition; it was recommended in the traffic re or'E: that S.W. 139th have the following lane configuration at the inters: ction of S.W. Avenue 139th and Mull Zountain Road: One inbound (northbound) lane and two outbound (Bouthboand) lanes. Therefore, it is recommended that the construct S.W. 139th Ave to Minor Colleetor Street Stan arde and Meet the roquir enta of • t fie traffic study. Currently Phase 1 of this development is ®till' being worked on. As part of the overall develepnent plan, it Wall required th t a connection between S.W. Walnut Street and S.W. Bull Mountain Road be provided and that it be completed during Phase II-A. This will be accomplished with the development of S.W. 139th with Pha ®e IX -1 S.W. 135th with Phase 1; and S.W. COniferoue with Phase II -A. It was aseu aed that Phase 1 public ie provements r inclusive of the intersection of S.W. 135th /Walnut; would be completed and open to the public pricer to further development. This road system, the minor collector between 135th and connection for this dev e1opment. Therefore, nttii Road, fie a Vital recoMmended P ' to S it .W. Q 135t Avenue that the �i rovem�nta Phase I etree ® and n. , ocepte�d prior to the recrrding of the ccnnpleted and conclit3.onallyr a plats for any additional pha ®es.i _ a the city "a a�tandarda, except for .�oca7. n�errria the rea►t� xxseet g e eul��aitt ®d plans that shOW . � � V'iew. applicant ®en ine��r had �$. +/- .. ,eet being built t ith 2/3 A1.�o n® lash .. �� feet of the Street -..... ....... street im rove p xaent®. This street will connect with the existing S.W Alpifle View located within the adjacent subdivision (i.e. three Mountain®. The Planning and Engineering L►epartment a have been in contact with the applicant's engineer and have informed him that fx,y].l St reat impr ove M entd would required; the engineer, is cxarreny working with h the property y ooaaere to the south ( tax lot STAFF REPORT ® SUB 91 o0i3 /PDR 91 0005 /MIS 91/0007 - SEIYU PALM 5 s � 1400) to accoznp1ish a lot • line adju©trent to provide the subdivision with the additional land, approximateiy. a 2 cot strip at, it® widest point, Heeled to .build the street'. to .' ,local street standards in order tO coninect with► the existing roadway`. This land would be exchanged for the triang alar shaped piece of land shown on the . south e spine VL w _ Drive tad j acent t© tax lot . 1400. T?e,erefore<. it to reco ended th the applicant be:, required,. to provide full Street i nprovements. to all local Streets including S.W. Alpine View; or that local streets have full i mprovemen_te and that s1 w. Alpine View would be terminated at the east end of the first lot located east of the intersection of S.W. Alpine and Miatietoe dand road when a street to Make the connection with the existing t iMprovame is can be Completed. $TORfl SEWER The applicant has subiulitted a preliminary stor>n sewer ayStem ?4.ayout.. d3 „fferrent drainage areas. The proposed developaaent Would be divided into. t terse ( 3) The first area waoul i� serve into the existing Corner ao � rov+sat 3.n �haopm=nt f with the drainage going g ( pp I.-. A) system. The Saecond area would serve the nOrthea,lt and central lots of the deVelot.iiiieilt. with the `linage going irstf.3 an existing byatem within what is kuown as Mee Mcuntaine !' ubdivi3ion" to the east. Currently Three Moun till being developed and y ire subdivision 3s ® g the improvement® have: ;!} •bt been aoceptea'k by the city. It .addt.on, it should be noted that the, City of TigOird is currently °marking with the City Attorney " Office and the Reac'lution Trust coma ittee (ITC) c>n "Three Mon ntain5 Subdi vi ®ion's . The developer and the bank that were involved With Three Mountains are t O longer gavel* and the RTC would like to work With the City to com mete the project, but as a`tif date no Strata has been developedo It it ;felt that this is timportant i information in that this deNeloptient, at least i�� part, is fully co feted /acre ed the cit . therefore, it sot yet Been toted relying on public, servi y g p ®r®: hg red 1� y ce facyilita.eai t a a�ve should b . qu� . ... that evidence be . provided that the storm sewer system within Thrcee Mountains Subdivision's is completed and acceptable to the City prior to any connectioh of this development to that system 'he Third area would 5 twe the sou :kern portion 'of the development and woad rases ed into a� .ex®sti.n des e t�� ghat �;® �.on poni� prior to being g y south of this ,development acrc)es Bull Mountain Road and ie outside of the a ity. TheroZore', the applicant Should be required to demonstrate the following• The existin�� system south of '5. , Bull Mountain Road had g . p .. . , y e the inc;reassed runof f or ouffi+�iQn�� ca acit to halredl the applicant Should ,be required to u grade the system, Complete details of the detentitiO /retention pond; including who d 11 leave Maintenance r'eopoustility foi the pond. 4. SRai ±TARP SEAR The a liOant has Submitted a preliu inarry sat itary sewer ►1ai^� The an reas. the basic layout �yi ®yetea� is div3.�o� iratm three diffesc�>nit a" ., the Same as detailed in the narrative for the sto w sower a 'Stem STAPP RE RT m SU R 0l- ®33 %PiLQ 914005/M1S 9i. %Cra007 pAft ; f with the northwest portion being served by , the existing system as provided in an earlier approved phase, the northeast and central portion being connected to the "Three liiountains Subdivision", and the southern portion being connected to a sylltem south of this development within Washington County. Again, it should be noted that the northeastern and central portion of the proposed system is relying on a system that has not yet. been approved or accepted by the city and that there are potential problems with that system. be required to demon Irat h applicant e and/or pr de evidef e that the system they are connecting to has the capacity and meets construction standards of the unified Sewerage Agency. • The City of Tigard _ Wilding Division hies reviewed the proposal and pro yi.dee ' tho following coa:anente sae prior tc issuance of building perm ts, a 'report free a registered engineer shall be submitted. The re pert shall indicate the location: of any fill Material laced on building sited, the suitability for soil for building construction, and the ®oil Atearing. capacity maximum elope Of 2:1 or B. The en i n ed grade hall certify tthe a Stability of any .steeper slopes. the engineer � Thii will include the slo pe and fill, from the excavation for the foundations of '.the • . truetures. . Private atoms drain lines shall be pr "ovided along the ear l t lines of lot® 346 -353, 339 -343, 337, .138, 296, and a all be \ ' f.. ♦ and maintenance � a greenie t shallbe reo ors d with each lot . aocead ng a private stora�� drain ,Line. These iota ®hall have an equal right to use, and an oblg atioii to operate and maintain the private drainage p T es fac ilities Within the private or pudic drainage,, easements required. • The Tualati a Valley Fire and Fescue District had reviewed the preliminary 3 plat and had ,oar rated that the applicant s ou be e�required to continua their obligation to connect 5W 135th through prier t ►, any further development of the property.' ¶;hid will help eliminate or reduce dead end made. Fire hydrant location�s b e e coordinated in _ � and Water istribe reviewed and 'Conjunction with tine Tigard • Tigard School. Diatrict 23,1 has reviewed d the proposal aid had coni nerited .. 4 that the District had previou®l.y, reviewed the potential impacts of this subdivision p seheel ied, and ties included these Iota within the chooli calcu�tioe for needed capacity. In addition the School District. notes _p reciati ®n of the proposed b us turnoff isle on Bull Mountain Road. lit,an Area Co ►unicatioh5 Commission (cable television) has �; The � � for this. _o_ develo by - ids ® area is provide Me r�opx� a tei.evi:dion dervic qu comamen.�.ed that 'cable Columbia Cable g in advance as to when trenches ►3,11 be open for Columbia Cable o£ ar a ono The Comma ion re estE that electr Coy . . d : p - stale electricit Inns telephone service, no that Columbia r�►ble can 3,an cable meet eft' ficientlyA Telephone (GTE) has reviewed the prop sal and has comae ed that its app1 sable to this General F T� for a liet o� :requirements th,, develo ere en�uld contact G oper should all. 45 to 60 dayih fries': of detailed �pi s to GTI� v ri� of construction. �l p or to the ®tart STAFF REPORT - Y7YlG7 91 0013/PDB g1.0005/MM77,$ 91/0007 SE ��p. rye ,, _ AG 7,, ., . The rovid� District and PGE have reviewed the no comments ox objections. e pr�l�saal and have in p B. A letter dated Se p temaber 23, 1991, was received at the hearing from Leah and Mary Zednik, owners of the subject tax lot 1400, regarding e,, leis intentions to continue working with the applicant on completing 'le proposed lot line adjustment. This letter is hereby made exhibit one to this order. 9. Washington County's Departm nt of Land Use and Transportation submitted ed a letter dated September 20, 1991 inz? uding comments and recoa ended conditions of approval related to the applizatic n. This letter is hereby made exhibA.t two to this order. 1 0. Dave Nioo„i and Fred Rosborough, neighbors o proposed development, provided oral comments at the public hearing ®n September 23, 1991. N'icoli read comments from neighbors Nancy and Bob Anderson regarding the proposed }rieve loPment a These comments are recorded in the Minutes of the September 23, 1991. v. EVALUATION OF REQUEST De+ve1.22EV t +.Code LPtIliall-A4d1.1stment 1. This proposed adjustment between tax � d $ ' ue and,t Lot b�`t1 of tax e Tor S�, division as well as the propo j 1500 and 1400 are consistent with the approval standards for lot line contained in Section 1Fi.162. ?60. ?. additional w� ul be created , the lot line ad justmeitts a.lor�o. All' p . e . . y g ham. imam lot larger than t...� sr�i.a sizes �re ited for their a es bent i re zones in the City and Wa, .: arngten Count i o setback violations wo ion eeult . 'of the y uld occixr as a r proposed adjustments; and all involved lots would satisfy the additianal lot dimensional standards and access req irement® of Section 154,162.050. Lot line adjustment approval will be conditioned With submittal off°; 'meat aeutvey map conasi.etent ' Code Section 18.162.065 lot line ough r 9 plat tot. the �u divieliofothat Clearly convey the areas subject to Adjustment in rsub � a manner that is satisfactory to both. the city's surVeyor and the Washington county Surveyor's office. ,._ 3. CArnp).ance , with elcuimunitv ;DeZ�lo:anat Code subdivigionJPlanned PENg124110i9111....telggrements 1. The lots' p pe.. >� are i:nteude use F comply standards of the R -7 zone district bec se the lots with the „ h�: �aropo�ed l � within the ro � eed be used for dingle - family detache s. Bite sues.. the of _ l g d l�.isas unm n lot site awl aubs�tantiiall " lar er ihassY the 5, d?0Q � �. a fca�t. .. . ianu>f� lot ots emceed the average lot w�.dth requirement o3: 50 feet, even though the p let onn satppliet to the parcel provides for tY��d Develo eat overla; " zone a ' , " f a size And ar that l All lots are o i.lihy to lot dimensional treat h ®saes should be able to be built upon ender ®. e di�mensa.oned such lots without variances to-the setback: standards of the cone. 2. parroposed of a Planned Develo eut� (chapter 18 80) with as demonn Crated chapters that the staff for 'the, various planned. policies and Code by the findinng® presented has found d applicable to the request. The commieeion finds ,� � following Ctsde . the r diress�ersitd- of fads ' that the STXPF REPORT -- sue 91- 0013/PDR 91- 0005 /Hxs 911000. sE xYti PAGE �! pi chapters. ar << not directly applicable to thy' current: rev.1.ew, although ,future imp:rozv.ments on the subject site will need to ce nfo iar1 With, . the recluiret t ts of these chapt era a . Chapter 1.8.1.44. Accessory Structures; Chapter. 16.96 , - A1d iaiunaX . ; Yard Area qu red ennt; Chapter 18.98 - . Building ''Height Limitati na* Blideptionsl 'Chapter 18 400 - Landscaping and Scree+ ni ng; an .,Z' chapter 18.106 Staff is charged with revie Ong the confermance a duture :Improvements frith these Standards 'through the baaiidtnti '�p cmit . and sign. permit revid0 pr acebec , as well as through Code, Enforcement actions. With record to the additional pl.ann ,d development apprev U Letter 0 c the Commission. finds Section 18.800120.A.3. a. (i) applicable to the review of this proposal. This seatien states that " , . asitree � buildings, and' other site elements is shall be designed and l.osoated t® preserve the olittisting trees, ,topography and natural d i ac 4 tc the greatest extent possible." the proposed subdivision would �e located in an area that - , does not contain any existing trees. Although the proposed t ivo1opment 0111 include substantial amount, of site easading, the grading plati indicates that the site will Continua to e i ion b >" same general topographic norm and dr .inage with `a .storm drainage network oUtfalling to the ravine oil the northeast portion of the property» The subdivision under review is a continuance of a previously submitted cubdiv,iaion. Therefore, the ro `st,1 need not be reviewed for conpIlanoe' With Chapter 18.88, relative to sofa . access., The proposal Was submitted p .ior to this chapter being enacted by the City Council. However, it is noted that residences to be built in they subdivittion will need to meet solar access atandarde for new construction. In or :der to eatiefy Solar accused standards for new costruction, apecia�l siting of hates on the Lute or reducti :na in c�atne3 building heights from- the tana c iu*, building height, ePecifie 1 by the R-7. ze no may be neceesexy. • the 'prr 18.92 be �aue 3the et mplses with the density standards 'Of P Chap .ear 4 acre net developable area. Of this site , (after deductions tor public right -of -ways) yields an gt it tinder zoning' nati oa. ' C eig h sin l farm l y sidentiai Lots are proposed. . The propo led is coneiste tt with tine rectpireinents of Chapter 18.160 becauaie. I4ae' a diems subdivision 'Reeidentialt designation's C s density opportt nity tot tht. site ae well ae with. the applicable plait p . r , 7 Zone, �-,.�i,c#.� »s the use and dirtenei;onaZ re � aiat�o ►�asi of the .p Fund other applicable reg :letione b. 'he proceed Wilma of the' subdivi ®ion, Summit tit Still Alciuntain;'' is not duplicative of any other ' plat rreco ;ded in 6 ashington County. Each phase Would be recorded as a separate phase of the larger planned dettelople t t for the Stirlifnit at 8t 11 li®aid~ta .n eubdi vision c. The : proposed streets are laid out to 41i4n With already developed, streets IA the adjacent Hi Tory tad Threw Mountain and with the a roved alignment �nment of 8 135th fdir��a3.n Atoatd, 39 th Avenue aoroes Bul . . �h r�it�n�.n ]�1�iaee �Ay, e divi�ican ®� pP.:h �W 1 S�$ °F nEPCR�i SUB. 31 0®14;4/aPDPi . . AGE 9 II The rephasing 'plan, with the; revisions reca./aended by the Engineering Department, its approved as consistent with the 1rited aa0or approval al of a phased `eubdivi�aiof (Code Section r w � FP 1, ) p hosed planned dent . (Section 15. 8 i'. 3 CJD) . The SW 1.36th -139th Avenue eat vanecc . e* . to SW Bull i ounte „bar► Road Would be constructed in the :text sub -phase to be ,constructed after the already constructed. p °.ase one., The SW 8erichvieW Terrace 'connection to this scvb'division' wou?, be provided in the followi ng sub- phase. T tee e ore, the rephac ing plan will provide for necessary road conyneetions serving the general area as well. 'as ,the proposed doVeiopner t, early in the development process. All necessary public ::ea, mt litien can be constructed with each phase without depending upon temporary public facilities. It .pie. necessary for the rephaling to be done as recommended by the Engineering Department 41, ni order to aepaid the need Lor temporary turn Grounds at the kind of the roan, Within phase 6 and the creation of an a cceseively long end Attest, 'i� , �rven if it is i . only a ' temporary s .$,tuatiodeed The total time for Construction of alb phases cannot exceed seven years as specified' by Code Se -4” on 18.00'-100. . The proposed aubdivisiotA is consistent with the req►tirements Of Chapter 18.164, or can ,be modified . to be CenttLatent with these requirements, because: a• 'elle applicant will be reot''=4,red to improve the SWIM.' Nount;ain Road frontage of the, efts to County Minor collector street standards with left an l•'tight turn lanes into the site as Well as a school bus turnout as proposed. • b. The applicant pp will be required to develop the SW i39tyn� -; 7136th connector street to .,,,,finer collector standalds. The applicant's pr i nary plans provide for this Btr, et to %ave adequate right-of-Way, pOarierat3nt, width, gra��.osa�t; and Other minor colleptor improv enter consistent With Code standards. The revised plans for phase 28 provide for driveway k' dOSiae to this collector street to be ,limited to only the eyebrow' serving proposed lots 335, -338. This limit on d iveways in was raiSed repeatedly � in the practice for coZkr�c;'aar�r streets as c ©a�a stmt t��r�.t-k� gootid design p review Of phase* 1 and 2A Other intern streets Will be required red tin be develr pe i to City of Tigard local street standards The applicant ' p r eliminery plans for developing internal eubd vision streets are consistent with Code standards for local street Width, grade, turn around areas, and iMproVernentd, With the ereeptien of s :cal Street in the b-ulaar turn around area at the end of, the coegsar ° to avoid the corner of the Site. t southwestern around W 135 e y he need; for vehicles backing �.b alley 138th loth. it order to +arn around . The proposed 138th Div oentae in t d reguiremrenta of Section 1 end 312 id 8.164.030.E .1 otwent:Q .h. alb. nt with the y foot 'Width Standard for alleys within residential Areas. d ▪ The proposed lots ere consiateacnt with Code standards for maximut lot depth-to-width 4th ' atio slid other lot dim5nsiOns standards: All lots an:e dimensioned t uch that residences should be able to built Without ne esaitaating variances. os. logical 1 co�ll�ctonnts: mtiemcai ths�o�h t �r s e+t�a p p Y provides for g Y. g ho devs .ciaaa; nt , Approval sTA I» PORT gas 91- 0013/PD� 91 -000th X '9t/0007 A sEird • JO 0 ..0 y . , as .' " _. yk ` q » ,. ,1,111 , . r'' Y 17 t; of the preliminary plat will be conditioned upon the appl'ic�nnt demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division that storm drainage from the pra j used development can be discharged into existing storm sac Wers aria from these sewers to downstream drainageways without ai� niticantly impacting downstream properties. Development draining g to the sewer in the Three Mountains subdivision will be delayed unti3. the City and the RTC are able to Mesolve the problems with the storm sewers in this adjacent development. In order to overcome this delay, it may be necessary for the current applicant t become involved in resolution of the problems with this downstream storm sewer gem fiance witil Comprehensive policies the subdivision is conaistent v. �.th Policy $e .its was provided oo se i.�'etic 1 the application and the public h "ari�ig on this p' g r Organization a' Lion 01 a ©o aehington County the both `Mei hb.,rh�a+ad organization azatiozz �ti and owners of property nit Plariting Pl �t�u y in the vicinity of the a te. ' The ,proposed development site has been posted with a sign noting that a land use Or development application on this site. was pending. Th Planning this Matter. on cond��cted a public hearing on September 23, with Poli c 4 :x.1 Condit ion is warranted to a. In order to comply to develop erosion control plan enduring co plianceh with ero0ien control standards for the Tualatin Ri .4r Basin, a ► ,part of the grading permit application. 3. This subdivision p p p icy' 7.1.2, 7.3.1, ardd ^� scant lies with 1�0 +� ro oltc cs. w,i11 extend public sewer and water. 1 7.4.4 because the �� systems to thin tits and will provide for denee. atia;ra� ,vide fos. unldler� c�ixrad instals of phone, electricity, slid cable 4 The proposed subdivision is consistent with Policy 8.1.1 which t city to plan_ and develop a . safe and efficient street requites the Cit _ .. and the other proposed Avenues W 39th system. the proposed i ®xtene�isan Of 8W 135th Y o _. southward to Sall fountain Road an p P sed st -nets +ill provide for adequate and safe access through the proposed subdivision �.�, much needed circa. *lation between adjacent subdivisions and betwee. and BW Walnut aStreet. �� well as n Bull. �io�.�ntrain� Road Th rewired 'improvements to the site's 3W ,lu11 Mountain;l Read frontage will improve traffic safety along this stretch of this re,atively narrow road. S. The aubd:�ie ion proposal complies with Policy. 8.1.3 bec Ataee the ro posed. imp. p�� with Cit... and adjoining Within .and f n Tiandor proposed will be required to be c�annist�� v�jashington County public improvement standards, Commission roval related to street conditions of app improvements provided by C i" t`: of Tigard Engineer °a.rlg Depa rtane it ppiE .,. 3 4 and r ided by a ,opts the r®comta►en ...the � Y -� ov and �recaicr� ended conr�Atc�.ona of a�-�_ .� . gal � . . . ` " e oondit is are rea ona ly related to the Washingten County. � :� �aee potential traffic impacts of the propose l dovelopli ent . mho con ission is unable to find that the �Oou,; t y' a recr`, ,,4nded coindi.tions 1 and 2 are aasoxiably related 4:o the potential Of hire develoi nlent due to the substantial distance between the proposed developmtent and the location a or theme recommended improvements STAFF REPORT - SUB 91-0013/PAR PAR 91.000S/ IS 91/000/ BBI 013/1 P11 Vt CONCLUSION ANP i3ECOM23EHDATI. *;. The planning Commission concludes that . the proposed development, with r nor injurious to surrounding land uses provided' modifications, a it pzsmlten the general welfare of the City and will not be d significantly ni.� scant ly �\ P _ federal laws. development that occurs complies with a . plicabl local state and f ... The Commission ap>prover4 these Subdivision/Planned ev follows Line fanned Development and Lot Li Adjustment proposals sus jest to the conditions UNLESS OTBEERWIS3 NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED E AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TS ASSURED SHALL BE COMPLETED OR ELSE COMPLETION SHALL FINAL PLAT 61 /tTH WASHINGTON COUNTY. STAFF CONTACT FOR ALL CONNDDIT ONS OF LI,TROVAL IS CHAIS DAVIES CFA THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 1. phase antis ® creation of a additional 68a lots as illustrated on limited applicant's the for phase 2B All lots shall be fully dimensioned on the final plate and shall be consistent with R-7 zon5 ng district dimensional requirements. The plat shall be a eviaed in the area of lots 309 and 310 to provide for an adequate turns around a,ea. Phases 2A and 25 my boa rephased into sub - phases largely as illustrated in tivit applicant's submittal, with the exception that phase liaise shall be ad �3tad so that no street shall b} s extended ended f ur he r thy n 150 lest Without an ut an outlet or turnaround . ep �� - :t ,all ss bmltarevised phasing Plan r staff review and apr�rodal , The Community Des ,op a t Director r may approve min or changes t :a the phasing plan as long as s uch changes do not significantly affect the provision of roads or utilities that may benefit Parcels or residents outside of the subdivision. line adjustment between tax lots 1400 and 1500 shah, be a The lot y3e p ed in order to provide for a connection of SWeAlpinetView.roc ®e proposed lot line adjustment The necessary element of the Ni Tor subdivision) is Proper tax lot 100 (Lob 1 of between tax lot 1500 and t ; ry subdivision approval. approved ?wit is not a necessary element of the s Recording of the lot line adjustments Separate from the plat recording may +; ied by code Section 18.162.085. j map be accomplished f through followin the f�.rtal lot line adjustment ma revieI process ep y 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, a report has a r ed d a gineer shall be submitted 0r all lots on which placed. shall indicate the location of any fill material placed on building situ, the suitability for soil for building construction, and the soil-be ,ring capacity. STAFF CONTACTS Brad Roast, Building .ng Division. 3. The finished grade of al1 lots shall have a rtsiariznum slinpe cif 2 01, or the shall certify the stability of any! steeper dopes. This will engineer include the slope and fill from the eiicrtvati.on for the foundations of the str ctur' P STA1 P CONTACT: Brad Roast Private storm drain lines Shall be provided along the rear lot lines of load 346. 353 0 339-343, 3370 3380 296, and 297. Easel ent8 shall be provided where crossing other lots. A joint access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded with each lot accessing a private storm drain line These lots shall he v6 an equal tight to use, and an obligation to operate maintain the ri.va a draina Te facilities within the P riVAte oetdrainage easemernts required . SAT CONACTS Brad Boa t TWo o. Q of detailed ? bl i c lim roveme nt Plane an d P rof i \e contrmc drawings eh all be submitted for preliminary revie w to th e Engineetrii.orn 4 sSTAFF REPORT SUB 91=-0 +13/PDA 91 0005/ MIS 91/0007 -� Department. Seven (7) sets of. approved es ,1; awi,ngs and one (1) itemizsd construction cost .estimates, all. prepared by 4\ :Srofeseiona1 Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and ' approvals, (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings regufi.reed by the Buildin(j Division and should only include sheets relevant to public iOproveemei ts An erosion control plan shall be ' provided as part of the . public improvement drawings., the pltxrn shall conform to ";! rosie d Control Plans Technical Guidance galadbook, Noveu ster 19E0." The applicant shall demonstrate that a .= drainage runoff can discharged into the existi,ng drainageway ®w;shout significantly impacting properties downstream. Storm drainage details r 'tAall be provided as part of the public improkrement planss Caloulatione and a topographic map of the drainage basin area shall be provided as a supplemen to the 'public impre�v�s ment plans. Calculations shall be bSeed on full development of the seriticeable area.. The location and capacity ebf existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed . A gradi ag plan shall be ss u witted showing the existing and 9ropose l ." typical levations . on each lot, i�ecludiag .•onteau�® and t ie�enl f�rTit�hed floor e elevations at 4 differest corners of the floor plan tied . to then top of curb elevations as 'shorts o n the public improvement plans. 10. access public storm and sanitary sewer systems, within the adjacent ub vservices, a Three . Mountains Yetates) , shall NOT be granted Building Permits until s ecA time as those improvements have been completed and accepted • by the City of Tigard. 12.. Lots south of , the intersection of S.W. Benchview Terrace and S.W. Mistletoe shall not be permitted to access directly onto S.W. 139th Avenue. �, p within Phase I, including S.W. 135th Aveente, ehali la . All street improvements be ∎77ompleeted and conditionally approved by th City of .:. Tigard and Washington County prior to the recording of any fut ure phases. 13. The applicant shall be revised to provide, at a thinimumo the lane gu recommended e Traffi' Report and half r'qt �eeet confi ration ' as BM un in the set forth b' Washington Ce3aail�li�uu ,. • � re „ i.�'es�►,eants improvements to S.W. Mountain Road in socordancee with e by g 4P � pond, h pp nP. with written be coilt leted Sewerage Agency, y, A� shall verification and aeMC' .3 ted by the Unified h wale a rovead for Phase 11 • 14. The detention ond, wfl�i.c p Y MN 9 9 provided to the City prior to rec&rding any of the new phases which will drain into the pond. ,.. : APPROVAL VALID ONLY IF THE FINAL PLAT FOR St.1 -PHASE OF PHASE 2 -B IS SUBMITTED FOR r APPR� S CITY APPROVAL WI7CA$�N %��GHT��1'� 1�If9N'�i3S OF T EFFECTIVE LEA. OF THI�S ... .. _ OF ;PALL PHASES OF THE APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS SEVEN `BARS, ON �? DECISION. OE`VE 5��.�A� a T MAXIMUM TIME FOR i�,4/L' Ti .. 't . p notified of the entry of this order. It 3�r� further ordered that she applicant. be PASSED: Thilest' 1` 1 a.,. of September, 1991, by the �, lanni g on o ..� y � �' is� �s+�i3is�si of the d,i.ty of Tigard. Vlaseta, East er, Vice. reiktide "t T ' ' . $00 9l g i3 /Pmt 0 l,»0di6/MIS 1lt2fAg7 �Q 4 ` e Y, "•iu??1'1'li t !i :�i J i Vtou'?'� ain r3'l: b' ivis "z.�Dn 1thrt ? !� < s.�'1R'l' ' , i�`r:veJ�or'nent I;ev et:•► 'I.7 ;�1 -� 005 • Sending Sen,ding this letter in regards to the continuation Street ;'f from Throe Mountains Subdivision went. to are the. owners of tax ] Mt 1400, lying southeast o•r' 'thy Droposed Surzt .t'.at nv,11 r'fountath Phase IIB subdivision i project." Our property also addoit4 Three Mountains Development on our northeast: corner. .�� . Alpine 'View street exits Three Mountains subdivision into the it at Bull mountain subdivision, oach.ing on our .. � S 10'1' �'rl� +r , �ro°oose�. Su'rrim. prov>erty 12' to 14' and turns to the north as it p.� ocdeds to the west . leaving a triangle ad.,janent to our. property. Development of this street to full width is not Possible without obtaining a tria rgu1sr strip of our property. „e .. g with developers opers engineer Tom Burton, • ,�. ; ,, I'! n �'o"i 1 111 `i a .� n��,ha been a tentative agree ner;' for dedicati and have reached e g � � on of this pra�perty: needed to allow development of S. W. Alpine View str et to full width. L Pine Vlaw All of the negotiations between the Parties will completeduaa d. the papers will be s i. ned before Phase on the latest map is g please ' f t,ftd map attached showing location of Sow. Alpine View street in relationto our property. hurlers of l~a Lot 1 00 VGPrY l 93,E Leah and Mai Zt LEGIBILITY STRIP 24 PHASE '_ X.C.t _, NA ?a S• • 2.35 13.Q4t ti.tt. , 4 g $TA. 11' f 5.70 EAl0` MATCH A$E'r =f 206 ' a13,55034.1`= 268- 6 2.63' - I4,692 I!1. %. 1-3.133-44.€L r .rte - •,. L,t' ZZ6 14 1zntsz 230' 9;962 -raft. .03 19.502.10. _ 209- _ `tte \. c; ^ 18,353t4.tt. 0° C STA. _ 3. 24.80' 223 T 313 t4.tt. 4 1 tit ..222 1317 -15 .tt..= -y�4, Dt 13„d43.1. soy. sr.& 1.44,....v CUE- OE - -SA. c RAD. P Pk ,h - ' 25Z 106314.1 21.7' 14282. sa.1t a `` a° Ga` 401' 216 'a 2I5 8,1&1s4.tt ?,OQ4t' . ' S X51, 1� �i0lo t t8.zc ;M AVB: Sint- ?D ,Ati ST 249 {�= VIC-014k ,e j'7/ I !' 248 t t Ezi ° 140' E-60i_ 9.15114/4 h --® ss w OMISTLETOE AVE. srA... 4 5._60 S.ly ALPINE VIEW `r.1-1 1 0 Lek 4vy e evil. 0;90.80 END CUL—DE—SAC. RQO. Pr: ST4, 84 39 S,wbAQ11SI: STA. 8419.70 ._,. SW.ALPINE VIE Gee CS .0O ..LEVISr;; ¢' SCA. (I C3 0.00 WASHINGTON COUNTY LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION 355 NORTH FIRST AVENUE HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 FAX NUMBER 1x503- 695 -4412- TEA AX NUMBER: , .... .......... PROD NVi . .. i r FROM: # 14 f -. /' Total number i of pages (including Coven) If all Pages do not contact receptionist a ��rive in legible fa�� please (503) 648 -8751. �I�1t#f �A iii Lang nd 'iran#E rtd �1�1� drrain S1ratIA�a . otie:503/ PAS` ieflq i4bi, 4 It CO CD °' to tt1J ±,� tN1.21 a { U DO -1 b04 14 t° bmH 2W l`a „/3. :3 441-1'"1 i a'J WAS7NGTON ). ir Inter-Office Correspondence Date!,, Sept. 20, 19°1 TO m Scott ng, Transportation Planner FROM Dou; Norval, P.E., Traffic Analyst SUBJECT: TRAFFIC ,'AqAFF REPORT NULL. MOUNTAIN summris VIEW ESTATES CITY OF TIC This re art examines the traffic impacts of the proposed Dui l Mount a l n Summit View Estates single family residential subdivision, to consist of2f ngle fan iiy;dwelling units located southf AWWalnut Street and north o SW Mountain Road i n the City of Tigard. An earli er phase ®f this to ��h� north subdivisions Bull Mountain Summit Estates, consisting of 120 s are n of the su5ject development, was analyzed previously. r0 developed to ensure an.adegUate level of traffic safety as defined by 86 -95. A traffic Access Report, traffic Impact Study View o� -� for Bull Mountain Summit Vi es Tigard and 'Washington County ", Charbonneau Engineering, May, 1990, wa Estates, g bons given below ed for this The findings and recemmenda, submitted development. are based, in part, on information provided in this traffic ,study. FINDINGS: .. � ffic, i5 1. Impact area, based of 10 i ner^e SO i i average dal l tra descr°i bed below . 0 .., '.... 0 S1 Sc bli s Ferry Rd $i to SW Wal nutAStreet S .135th A ►e Ei1 `i edeman St ON. l e ) '. Hwy. est •(9gW •SIB �dl "�` i�ountai n Rd SW .150th. Ave ►qve Paci fi th wera" , i .: M and • PM ..Peak �t area .,�� a+nal�+�e 2e •Intersections. a�i o��iownn iresul�ts. hours withthe f 1 g Turn lane Signal intehse tlor L Via.. a .. V Arta S P Sy ,� • ..135th /W�1 nett ., „ : , C NQ No No y No 'N/A ha .. ,, l s �orr B,, . �3�th /soh ®1 W.a1:nutt'lZIst b.E No N0 Yes Wal riot /Ti edol,Man. 0 m..1 eg a EDF No to Nl oul Mtn Rd 10th Ave A'. Nv l .� . q •des �o � N /�h • Bu11 Iltn RdfAccess 'Gull Mtn Rd /pac iwy d � N® NjA We 3 . The h s e x istaing ! n te rsec t �t� j i en o ff SW Wul n t t St ree s at:S W t1 3 5 t Avr _ e nue • doe not mee t eur�^er c�sien sta�davds . An t �nteri� mph ve01en t o • tis• l nt®rsecti on Das apps o'Ved Amcor the. Bull Hownta i n £wa i t Estates .pplication, based on re0ues .for odificat'on ti the Washington Caen y U i fog a u ad I p��e�u�t del n Sp Ult#wately, the atru/135t' r ter sectib r. slan d de m 00O4t is to n i. i1 meet County standards 4 Ne safet±1 i m roverents • are wotp,anted at the 135h/Sehal i s Sorry 4: Rand d't rsect1 on... a' G'muM4CIVUU TRAFFIC STAFF REPOIIIII BULL MOUNTAIN SUMMIT VIEW ESTATES ( CITY OF TIGARD) Sept. 20, 1991 Pvge 2 mCr' 44 43°4(461 ' .,'{i 7 :1 r. w..y • The Walnut /121st Ave i nterse lion is an EXi sti ng Hazard (SPIS) location. r ati On• a. + � I t i s current % y f, Z -1 ane by 2 -lane all-way step cont1 o1 l ed intersection. Total traffic at this intersection with ..,the ,,,,xisting lane geometry tr and s. h op sign control is Project ed d to operate at an acceptabl e LOS (D .E). A foc �aY eta flashing bea on as conditioned on Casef i l e 90 921,, i s the rocom monded improvement for this SPIS location. . The Wa1 nut /Ti edeman (north leg) intersection is calculated to be operating at LOS F under Existing traffic. No improvements that are not already warranted at this intersection under Existing traffic are warranted by this development. . No improvements . ,are Warranted at the Bull Mountain Road /160th Avenue intersection. ` intersection SW et3d �. :The w►11 Mtn load /site access road � ' cti on i � r ®j to rse efts a on Sid -0 �"� l a eastbound left turn g exceed warrants ,fur an Moentain Road un "' total traffic. conditions (including Year 2005 n�er ota . Bull Projected growth). A eepa�'ate westbound right turn lane ao -_, and tWe southbound a Report" lanes on SW 139th Avenue Mountain Road, an are also recommended in the Access i • No impravenae its are warraated at the Bull Mtn Road /Pacific Hwy (99W) intersection. RECOMMENDATIONS: f 1. Sign a waiver not to remonstrate against the formatf .gin of a Focal Improvement District �,or others mechanism e echanismta provide for the i m_ rovemeht o f the SW Val p nut Street/SW 135th Ave cdus intersection to County standards • Provide a four -Way Stop flashi eg beacon, at the intersection of SW walnut Street at SW 121st Avenu o s and r turn � ... a11...t�le access roadway 3 Provide separate left � lanes fight t�!r� southbound at the approach'te SW Bell Mountain Road. 4. Provide left turn refuges on SW Bull Mounta. i n Road in t ,u e ea,.tbAUnd and Westbo:en � directions at the SW 139th A, �sehs read � �, 7 Avenue /site t"� � d d� recta �, t feet coif storage length fo. each `ref ihte�^sec� r�n� Provide 100 fe refuge th _ 1 ane provide a sep agate right turn 1 ene on SW 0Ul 1 Mountain Road in the � 5 �rdv � P � westbound direction at .the site access road intersection. . . 4.6 brns e/434:1 Chris Davies, City of Tiga Massoed Sabehl an THOMAS BURTON BURTON ENGINEERING 11945 SW PACIFIC ! .#302 TIGARD, OR. 97223 • KURT VAN v'0'LKENSURG S' `'IY U INTERNATIONAL 10220 SW GREE NBURG 'C► SUITE 450 TIGARD, OR 97223 LEAH & MARY EDNIK 13395 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD, OR 97223 tiY wM ��.Yli JAMES , & BARBARA BBC 14005 SW HIGH TOR DR TIGARD, OR 97223 DAVE NIELI, 14180 SW 143114',i TIGARD, OR 97.23 MARILYN REBRAUGH ,., 1E�55 &SHIGH TOR DR TIGARD, OR 97223 DOUG 1L ORVAL NA. dO. LAND USE & TRANS I 155 Nm FIRST fILLZ 3ORO, OR 97124 STATE OF OREG&'+t+ County of Wasihizgtoa City of Tigard depose and nay : (Please Print) That I am a for The City of Tigard. Oregon, y- That I nerved NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR :, being firs; duly sworn/affirm„ on oath nerved NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: �_,,, City of Tigard gla nning Director t 'i igard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A. copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named attached lint marked exhibit "B°° on the said notice NOTICE OF D' CI ION as hereto bulletin board on the day of in the United States Mail on the postage prepaid: Decision) of which in attached (Marked pesTqpne at th9. ad ess shown on the c ay of _ , attached, waP poet one appropriate. 13.,: L ; and depo,Lted day of . 19 day of e Person who delivered to POST OFFICE tiliti n3W ,. the br, * ° and aworn /aff inn to ire on th ' 4A . �. and yr^ iDJ, 't. A '� y4. ( uk itiAlt Ems' NOTARY PDRLYC OF OREGON My� C lesion Expfi res NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY MONDAY, 3e mberG23�EN3991� AT � 3A�F�,F IN PLANNING COMMISSION, SHAZ,Ao AT ON �'� 1;XVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL ?BLVD o , TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER Taq FOLLOWING 111PPLICA'TION>; FILE :O.: SUB 91- 0013 /PDla 91- 0005 /SLR 91- 0003/MIS 91 -0007 /VAR 91 -0013 FILE TITLE: Burton /Se+tyu International APPLICANT: Thomas Burton 0W R: Seiyu International 11945 SW Pacific Hwl #302 10220 8W Greenberg Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 Suite 450 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: SUBDIVISION _ 91 -0013 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR q1. -0005 SENS1Tmg ] +ANDS SiGflt 91 0 ®03 LOT LINE_ ADJUSTMENT MIS 91- 0007 waggant VAR , 91- •:.0013 BURTONISEIyu _ INTERNATIONAL (NPO) #3) The applicant requests Subdivision preliminary platT Planned Development conceptual plan approval of the area that has become known a®, Phase IIa of the Summit at Bull Mountain aubdivisioa. This ►pp1ica* ien is a continuation of the review of Phase IT of the Summit at Bull Mountain subdivision. The original review requested; 1) Subdivision/Planned Development approval; to allow 97 acres to be divided into 276 lots between approximate) 8,000 and 32,000 s, approval n increased lot width t+ depth ratio square certain) lots where a ratio of 2.5 ©1 Is normally required; 3) a Sensitive Lando permit to allow development at eaf 54 lots on slopes that exceed 25% grade, and 4) two Lot Line Adjustments. Approval was granted for the northern 215 lots (Phase I IB) and the method for aece®e t0 SW Bull Mountain Road was continued by the Planning Commission and shall now be reviewed. Also the applicant r %quest® that the Planning Commission approve sub - phasing of what was originally referred to as Phase II into eeven nub-phases. s. ZONE: R -7 (PD), (Residential, 7 uniteieera, Planned Development) LLOC,4T ON: Bull Mountain Road and SW 139th Avenue at tae south, and the exit t $ e g southern terminus of SW 135th Avenue at the troth edge of the subdivision. (We-TM 2S1 9, tax lots 102 103, 104, 20. 0, and r G ... loto 900, ®0) .0, APPLICABLE APPrOIAL „R x ERIAa Community Development e sections lg . 54 1 .80 18 •9, 18.160, 18.152 ` 18.L64; Comprehensive Plan P olicies 2.1.1, 4.1.2, 7.1.2, 7.3. 1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, and the Mal Mountain Community Plan. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BEe Side) CONDUCTED IN Actor i tics WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IeN OPTED. � r a BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, ORgPULER, I�PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. MAY BE SUBMITTED ED IN W�tITING TO ANY PERSONS HAVING INTFEEST IN THIS NATTER MAY ATTEND 1 N HEARD, OR TESTIMONY . BE ENTERED INC T; THE RECORD OF THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD C1MPREHENSIl�Ii PLAT A. THE TIG � e APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE COMMISSION W:i T L BE BASED UPON THE', E RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TOTHEi�, aPPL.CABLE CRITERIA =STEM, CRITERIA AND THESH CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE MARINO TEIO ;, OR , LETTER PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE I1� PERSON Opt BY LETT TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAG OR INSPECT/ON i�T NO COST OR ALL DOCUMENTS IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR At FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAEV 1BE oaaTAX1 ED FOR T. . ... T LEAST SEVEN DA'(S PRIO!% To TBBE HEARING .. A O45ft ¶'� U STAFF REPORT WILL liE At TEN. CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT TH3 CONTACT 1 �i DEPARTMENT AT 63r1-417 , TIGARi� CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., ONTACTNVOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) 3 CHAIRPERSON: Herman Por ter PHONE NUMBER: 639.0895 ..., II;:glket i eta- & rnap rapreste -`_? 'atlas ,caspilsd It; £ba. City_ of Titard atiliriig Caagra pbic ieloraatisa Slsttia CIS) atftwara:. Isier- partrayo- ktrs iattaded to be aaaa :itRE additieast -t €airizat aattar intsryrtitfige d¢TJ _ - as, dataraisaf aY - ! a `City. *# _Tigard_ (iiPSUae0) 401 {01fa3lt•) 2S109BD -.07000 4'••dwa•wM••e1r.. .a.a PLIRGDSON, WILLIAM R /Aim 5005 SW HURRAY' BLVD 1309 BEAVERTON OR 97005 25104004-60700 • .b 4'i SA/TO, PDMIO iamb KOUSAI ASusCCEO BY TuIit1 ELAu8 wits 1070 WI MURRAY RD S TE A PORTLAND OR 9`229 00 0dl d 44•4•P`.4rr•,4. 25109HO100 • • • • • !MIGHT, HARRY R&Valglo NAB 14280 SW 1.415T AVC 'TIMM • '4 e'.e /► w • 71 • • 4 t • • •, 1 OR 97224 23105D1 — 02200 •rs }4•••4••e4•oac'•4du4 aumcs, U1 0E W :94 GIL ''.,. CA 94526 . SlaliD0,1:00600 • • d+a4••4••o•s BENCBVIEW ESTATES 8925 SW BE V - i#iXLLSDALE HWY PORTLAND OR 97225 ei.4444•4 2 S1040C' 0520'0 • • 6 li • • 4 4 4 V 4 O • 4 • 4 d 4 • 8ENcHVXEW '� EATE h ��yy.�� 3025 sw SDI E r�� PORTLAND 97225 2S104D6,..05900 • ae "y. •• 4 4 4 0 s e.n o e,4 u 4 e e• BENcHU IEW ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSN BI L A. DEVELO M;ENT 8875 SW BVTN'aLSDL fft4 PORTLAND OY 01225 28104DC -05901 .4 HERITAGE (DEVELOPMENT CO INC 16850 SW UPPl71.,12 BONES FY RD TIGARD OR 91221 28105'1- O•5O0 wsa.6•id4 BOAT itN, tilkta .R � D 14705 SVI StflISE LANE OR 97224 TIGARD o 14004 281098C -00300 +wo +u•44e44r4w4 RAW- ROBERT A !MEN .1G 14526 SW 141ST i8iyy �qg ��++►► //�� /pi/�pp �g 1 � 1 " • � ;, 0400 --IDOf ti • 4 4 6. .• 4. 4 •, D LUN.. IiDBERT JOB 14065 SW :'FE1 N " /104t,t0i 2S1040C,r- »00V'in 008URN, PB . *. S INGRAM, PATt1 `? 6310 ,32 ST N , HI' iE �' 0' 0 a 4,,e • ce • 4 4 • e 0 .0 •'• ae 2S1050D -02100 440`044 00 glOszzit, '.BUD 14735 Ski Stft4R1Sf LASt TidiRts o ►' 223 a311tti • • • • • 0 • 4 4' 4 • 4, 2S105DD 02400 0•iYdW4 +. • ••e •• '; ROBBINS KetTa EDWARD +y it, { S'`2 0 14625 SW 6I6$ LZ TXGARD R 97'2 2S104DC- 45100 ••1`h *.•O O'or••0Maaip0 NTL ,ENTERPRISES INC AND VitsmVp,' wuxs. 61 AND LUTZ, AR's A, ET AL 515 tW 94TH IiRrti eft POR7MAND !�OR 59229 25104DC- 0530'e • or*o••••• *•••• 11ENCHVIEW ES R O •';'d' • ASSN �► E 4 PNENT 87�` L A 8875 S vTN -1 .SDL ava PORTLAND N ryr�e�±± OR 97225 25104DC-"OS600 4 o o is u h;• d 6 •' i d. e• dr `• a 1`,• 4• BENcFria a gN EsTteT.N: 11014E0WkiERS ASSN ` 1 A` .OPttT 6875 S 'I'd6 PO1R, 1I� /�yd OTt 97225 2S108J,nA' -00100 ill a' -4 fo444o4 A0 40k 4 •ill4 oi EISSEICV 8',fT 9449' SW 1 KESIti ` Att TIG OR 97224 2S109$C400200 • r • 4 4 1 d t1 •'• 4 • di bo • 4 44 SNJ1C .....GAIL: �► X4460 SW 14 'ST 2,01O9Rt- 00400 M n 4'• kootr.LL1', ward . it 70DY op. 97224 110, '....;!***004KF9P. !! 4 ".p A w o,r• s p,p q A R :•..0 ° ! n06Z0��S60 { Yi. gg40 auverx xsTtic ms Os2PT AinPasUu d qw`i R �2# If' 0��q0 ty t!M ••W5! W!!:+�!PeP.!pp4Rf! 'OQ6O "w�Lif pySZ a 04VPXX e nsO$Stet no 'aw TIV4PV0 00111 ; t° [ "NVW4 VX M D'�:tl o • b.�� Y sII {p P O, N •..i '�I a O. .b b b 0,try TCT`ply) 17 '^"100 T SZ A VIXXPUZA • NIPO I C1'IAX 3 I "..'""°°!"00.""P0°. - a)14,6if0 O'OmMSO aa strixua I'4S TIES ONV S"I1214 Qom/! jJ'��Ave • M + O O M .d 1j;1f + • p' O A fl H ,' p * w. 00e00_0t36i.�'Gl.► z au sON tZZL6 914 adan M0 OgS9Z d0 c11 u91117.7 12i'1. • • • e OVV O- OV63TSZ VZZL6 IQ Q'o& ti, 4 . / S AiOEdi�± WRf6.eH�I�C�/SmloAv •,'•••4'e•o »penm�p +P11,s y• OO'99K- 0160TSZ 6 au itatar x'0669 O tx ;' ZHamonslogii 0 VIttaaa s WI smog • 41 m 0 * 00Z90-O 14 I QTSZ.' 01EV,!1.6 'SSA lna01100 SH 0s9Z 00000°......0"...e4 , 1 00610- 016OtSz EZZ •O 40 :411:!1/41014- $xtOaxA I • Qom' o.a,,m w q'p,'+p • •'m,w a • 4u34 0100'11i :41J 7 G tZ EZELO u0 0 nxs &SttY MS 09tlT • aNT 7IHH aNv r Qq0WKva ' I }13r 11134 f •.e a au•♦e 4, 01li00 °0060R.S? •• e w a•• p e•• EZZL6 $H0 ± a n a uoI IW1H HS OTO t H VNNv20 .o Q °33L�ta�Ya�y? p 4.a1h0° 009Q0 WI6VLsZ p p• p• ■ }� g !� a o• EZZL6 !0 auvoix ;[4V SsTV2 is 00VVI: xz }1 'aaos * • O a • •. R 0 4 • Y.o • M • • •'�h Y. Y OG9 O 86®T,*S4 EZZL6 110 j� y pp,� yEiy�, stvia Io& Ig L4 jS F V t g =KA asommassou om. •oyr•p.s.o'••••••Pp''• 0000 sg EZZL6 110 4J1s a4D!0 VOX Noxa MS S00VT O VUVEHI1E SERVE' 'MOR£ N • b' +1 00T00-SS60tsc Q a o♦ p w••• p• t+' ZZL6 110 • • w * n • cI• { * w w + • • • p �o 4•� ' , O3SIM S '2 SSSBY91C y O 6 Y 13 { galagall MESHS _ • w o OO690- U6OtteZ 900L6 aa'+ Ilovagarlie ' I 44S 00frOT Na '9�1 axmassitian OI�iRH o • • 4 • ♦ 4 p • • a O • .w • A wa m 9 o 00,g0 0560 W S? EZZL6 -de - ' auvoix Rama MUMMA MS 091frin V SIMI r rarVEDM .1ai V c w • u ♦ ♦ • P • • • • a o e • • 0 • •.• 00020- #aaG0 S.S(a y T' ZL6 110 O VOYX GE S S OL6CI V4 HEM 0HV loin ;MIRK 'o a +a•d;•o♦p.' +•pw•we••••ow 005A00- a@6otsZ EZ ZL6 110 0f01i H /VMHO M • e n • • Tine us cesET tE as 0OTO0atN60t S Z ALC1181031 1 26.1O9B - '0296,5 0osei3O e•0 e0 e0 e70 mAsuusan, TR1'oDc 3 24 i0 PAMOg R 14405 $W BICH, ` TOR DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 2S109013- 0291 OJL$REO a RODER M tONA'. 14320 l'SW 'H GW /GAD 2S109I B- *O2919 0 , eee+ w►•iMw RAONSPERGEIR / JOHN T ELI %A 14260 SW HIG l TOR DR T GARD OR 97221 '122rjl09aB °01400 ••,gawwi0ww2i••••• «ww•• 0.t'ASSER$ i ooi r A DOL H 14320 SW 1415 i TINA /". 2510983411500 an4'ew4•wwwm wavwisebw • CLARK, A ROIR$, matt 11307 SC PR/3 S PORNO OR 97266 2S109B13- 01100 •. • . w g ' ANOERS Ii,; :.'aAERT '7 NANCY 1� ' 14220 SW 141ST TI'S ir 2S109 -00300 siw ewe wewli *• 1, W r its'" A REL EN G 14520 EH 4.1.411ST PORTLAND OR 97224 04.y0 .o w ii;' 2E1092B.02903 09 *ii a iea w!►wwonimw .26109911429 29 i �M w•dbik+�±i aaiNws,o'uss9e +i MARION 14 IMMIX, ROBERT 14 HZD�y g , i►A� RXTI�► 3� Ofl TOR R 14305 SW HIGH TON. DRIB 97224 TIGARD OR 9722 SEt t INTERNATIONAL 10220' SW . GREENSORG A R1, 8-450 'PIGMY): OR 972 .• tt 6�a ea .J C USDI r1! e� �,; CITY OF OREG ON te.or 4/Aor "03k Sr/4001141/51'-‘/: CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hallo PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639 --4171 1. OENP2AL INFOREATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /L0CATIO �'/� ;fir, • t L2i /fir .,,;4 "1 eti A'dNC' TAX MAP MID TAX LOT MO. 05 2t1C> 4. t `2 -45 ----` 4.4-61 -. ---, C" . ��,, t� e SITE SIZE CJ= PROPERTY OWNER./DEED HOLDEa* : 1. ..G - 6 ('r 1---c c , .. /(,.alt 0' r .re.. )� FOR STAFF USE ONLY ? v :11, --4 CASE I�'O y OTBER CASE NO's; RECEIPT NO./f�..___ APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY DATE: tSiiitofp Application elements submitted: -Application form (1) B) Owner's signature/written 3 /O7 authorization —00 VC) Title transfer instrument (1) (m) Assessor's crap (1) ..9�.:.(E) Preliminary Plat (pre -app checklist) ADDRESS >T y H01i , ''a L 1, t1 1=J 7.120 (F) Appliceut s statement CITY ao 7 Z I P G .,Z APPLICANT* i., G% List of proPertY o w ners and (1) ADDRESS e9,5-...1 � . - c, e , PRONE !� �/ �.�.. addresses within 230 feet G`yy✓' (pre -'app checklist) CITY i ZIP- -„ *When the owner and the applicant are different applicant must be the urchasre people, the app- � era or a .... possession ` 3.th written authorization f am the sownrr or agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) applies. p tion in the space provided on Page two or submit a written authorization with this application. Z. _:�.. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owrsof re cord of the subject request permission to divide a l Total Area parcel into '- lots between (number of lots) ., ;�, .�. , square feet . : :.-!.. f and j *..e'00 / roperty 0► 20P/.3P Revd: 3/88 9M VAR 1 6 1,9q cry�!r1 y:LO l'4 ki • jj Yii ) Piling fee (f41 plus t5 Per lot) DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE FINAL DECISION DR LINE :,__,_ COMP. PLAN/ZON DESIGNATION:" N.P.O. Number: preliminary' Plat Approval Date: Final- Approval Date: •Planning En ineering Ieco�.tk Date acid • • .mber: .0 ..h ti 14545 SW PEACHTREE DR TIED , OR 97223 2S1098D -07000 ••'•• •••••e••••••••.• FERGUSON, WILLIAM R /DIANA 5045 SW MURRAY BLVD #309 4 BEAVERTON ' OR 97005 2S10400- 00700 ••••••••••r•r.• SAI` 0 FUMI0 AND KOUZAI, IASUHIRt9 BY TAIRA KLAUS CC'RP 1070 NW MURRAY RD STE A Pi RTLA ND OR 97229 2510989 -01200 •••••.•...•a•..�o••a WRIGHT, . RY RACHEL mAg 14280 rAW 141ST AVE TIGARD OR 07224 2S105DD'- "02200 e•e meei•i•ed• retie BURT E, M URICE [I MARY ANN A 294 GIG BLAS RD A" NVILLR CA, 94526 34455 SW PEA TIM OD s.1• 1 E DR 'OR '97224 2S10400.40500 • .00.•• •• LUDLUM, , ROBERT 5 : JOANN x.4065 SW' FED frXGA OR 97223 2810400- -00800 , .. • • OGHURN, PHILLIP N NGR1 M, ;'PATSY G. 6310 132ND ST N WHITE HEAR LAKE MN 55110 2810.5DD- 021,00 eieolloo.00togropoikettailio gPEZZ , DUD 14735 SW SUNRISE LANE TIGARD OR 97223 •ev 2S105DD- 02400 ...A.•v•s•,••w••ve•••s ROBBINS, KEITH EDWARD') AND CHRISTI 0 14625 SW SUNRISE L 1ik '): 'YOA,RID OR 97224 2S104DC -006t0 e.•.•'i.. e•...eo••b. • BENCHVIEW ESTATES 8025 SW BEAV -W .Y . .. Y. . ....._ . �IILL+SDAeE HWY PORTLAK4 OR 97225 2S104DC- -05200 oesovoe ••ee•e•.i.•.• E1 NCHVIEW ESTATES 8%11.5 SW BEAV. -HIL : SD aLE PORTLAND OR = 97225 ... r� ,may 281o4DC.o55O0 .•ioo••oie.i•.ebed••o BENCHVIEW ESTATES H0O'WNERs ASSN BY L A DEVELBPM NT 8875 Sfid HWV PORTL AD - .. OR 97225 po 2S140•lD Q5901 eoeao•A �•aiesm•e•s•`.• tigAITAGg DEVELOPlMEWT 00 INC 16850 SW UPPER BOONES FY RD TIGARD on '97224 a.�, yy�, , - ,, ..CC �+�, .. �, 0 . • C • • •.. �'r�1'VSDA O ®510 a•• u i•••• e S i• BOATMAN, BARRY D 14165 SW 8UNAISg L14M TXGARD OA 912244 _9UiC1O'L7 ®+,100 i it e•• b 6.• o d IIAi i, ROBERT 1 ELEN aC 145 "2O SW 41s °. tel .•. e e i, d oe i i 2S104DC -05100 e. ,i�.+ 4�ee•i�•eee+ NTL ENTI PRISE$ INC AND FASANO, ?N6bUIS AND LUTZ, AllTguR A :PT AL 515 V4i1 94TH TERRA PV.R`TL ND OA 97229 28104DC -05300 • O•• Oki ••• •• •••••• BENCRVTBc4 ESTATES HOMEO0NE1u ASsN SY L 14: DEVELOPMENT 8875 SW BVTNiaSDL HWY POUOIAND 0A 91225 251,;041bC- 05600 .e•ro••••$•.s.i••.id "e BE CBVIEW ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSN BY L A LEVELOPMENT s81S SW BVTN- -RL3DL HWY PORTLAND OR 97225 2510800 -00100 .•••ie •••i e iii ••••br SISSETT, cTA1NET' 9449 SW LAKESIDE Ott TIGARD OA 97224 2S109.BC�OO2bO as•••.iwi i• •rear SNYDER, GAIL �/ 1:4460 SW 141ST TIGARD OR 37224 261098C- -00400 goo sy',40- 1.0 Awl umiiso NODY 14 ti 28109BD -00100 r i.oc•••••••se� COY, DEAN 13580 SW BULL MOUNTAIN .MAD TIGARD OR 97223 28109BD.03.600 •••. • ••a•,►••. •••e DAMON, KELVIN LARRY . :IND ,r4AREN _ L 13970 SW BILL HT RO TIGARD OR 97224 201109BD402000 ee4•.e.e•r CAPRI, MICHAEL J & JANE A 14480 SW PEACHTREE DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 2S109BD ",06400. e • Q' e • • o . • o 0 o • e . • • HERB MORISSETTE HOBDXLDERS, IN 10400 SW BEN BLVD 3EAVERTON OR 97005 25109BD -06904 o e • • . ... SHERWOOD, ROBERT A S ALECIA M 14485 SW PEACHTREE DR TIGARD OR 97224 2810935 -00100 0. ... .•...e•e•••eeee BECK, JAMES f! Z�BARBARA HIGH TOR DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 2S1091313=00400 .e is is •• 6.6 • 66 ROSEBRAk`'''GH, FRED E MARILY 14155 SW HIGH TOR DRIVE TIGAR9 OR 97223 25109E04040 r ... • , «; LAMB F :.OBE'ItT A .AtD PATSY 13890 SW ` BULL MTN ROAD TIGARD OR 97223 40.4140. 2S1O9►D•01900 ••a;•••.•4•a•Mr•�•••d• PHILLIPS,' HILLIPS ROBERT. F SA & OZP TRICE 2630 t CORNELL RD rORTLarD OR ';97210 2S1O9BD4.06200 ............ ID •.•o• is BLAZER HOMES INC . DOUBLE D DE`i] RENT INC 5950 at nzw, RD LAKE OSWEGO OR 91034 2S109BD -06500 660666e64ee44466 •m4o-e HOLMBERG, JON S / P M 14484 SW SCARLETT PLACE TIGARD OR 97224 2C109A0'01400 :•:se.A•ea. a •e. HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT CO INC 16850 SW UPPER BONES F'Y RD TIGARD OR 97224 28109BB •00200 ............0.000.... DAY, LA VELLE AND MARIE N 5311 SW CHILDS RD LAKE OSWEGO ORS 97005 •.e.T• 281098B. 00500 ••4r. •••.•.•••••s•a • MERRIFIELD, JOHN T VIRGIV'IA E 14205 SW HIGH TOR DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 2S109BBa01600 4666 •04eee666 sei• e4 DOFF, HARRY 14400 SW 16441ST AVE TIGARD OR 01223 231098B -00600 .:.. PIERCE. ROBERT A DEANNA M 34010 8W HIGH TOR DRIVE TIGARD OR 07223 ..,e.... • • i 4. 25109BED4•C f800 6eee666e64q64 '.4•;e. ?se PKIL CH1, i tatitoLb Akti LAINE 14160 SW 141BW T1OARI1 OR '91223 2S109BB.O1?00 6644 OOOOOO44.400ye46 RAUF°MAE, 1411E0E AND RANDALL MORE, ®DA 14425 SW MCFARLAND OR 010223 2S109EH6600900 04444446,44.4444444'44 NIOOLI, DAVID P & REBECCA L 14180 SW 141ST TIGARD OR 91223 2t 1i60R0' c'022 00 • ink' •• • 4 ry64 a b; a e • .ddb 4 d' a 4 a TIGARD .$44TER- 0%.4.. 1C Br 3841 SW 00 RCTAL LR 97223 4 HA,RION W 14305 ° SW HIGH TOR 'iDRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 25109H6— .02905 • ••••.'• ••. • •••b • MAGNUSON, THEODORE W AND NANCY 14405 SW HIGH TOR DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 2S1093B- 02919..:• • .' e . b HAUNSPERGER, :7a ELISABETH E 14260 SW HIGH TOR DR TIGARD OR 97223 2a1000131-015Q0 e • s' M . • • s �► e i � N • . • • • I 0 * CLARK, .DREW R 113071, SE PARDEE ST PORTLAND OR 97266 S11.10988 —02918 qi •••*a••..•a.•s•N • s ULSERG, ROSERT D AND LEONA L 1432Q SW HIGH TOR DR TIGARD OR 97224 2810913401400 ••'.o• •• ®••i•.0..0 GASSER, ROBERT A DOLORES 14320 SW 141ST TIGARD OR 97224 2518988- 01100 • • .0. • .• • ANDERSON, ROBERT L NANCY 14220 SW 141ST TIGARD 2610950 00300 •••„.o,k •• td, Amnia A HELEN G 14520 SW 141ST` PORTL D OR 97224 •,r • • e i 2510985- 02c+C►3, w s• w•• a• HERMANN, ROBERT it itRION W 14305 SW NIGH TOR. DliaVE TIGARD OR 97223 25109BC **00400 • • • • • • • • • • :a al ? • • HOG/IIIVRAY, LARRY R "lam'' JOD '' S 14540 SW 141ST AVENUE OR X5724 fir• •.a •oq� 2:4109DN »0.2904 ',•4,-••wr!r.•o•Y••��r e•••6 _E WRIT ► ki Ek3Li�HIDB.n , �Y,'�, 1435# S[ '' NXOU TOR' DR TIGARD TO3 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DAT1 : .2412A.4.0-,k6.-1.1(d FROM: Tigar4 Planning Department : SSt1BDIV.j, "Xo g1 -0t 13 ; ®rTwI �Al ?131 3 g : SLR 91- T . mI 11 91 000n _......_- ._Q.,.,..r N EIYU 000 T L�t�`D ` i�D3iJ�TIKEN IMP �.cas�t requests subdivision pzce INTE TIQNAL NPO #3) The a 1 iminary plat Planned DeVe k op n? nt conceptual plan approval of the area that has become known ag Phase 'IXH of the Summit at Ball Mountain subdivieiv4n. This application id a colitinuatx.on of the review of Phase II of the Sumrit at E4 1 Mountain aubdivisioa , The original review requw ted p 1) Su, ,z ivieion; /Plana gd DetelopMent pp to allow' 97 acres to lbes divided into 276 10t0 between approximately approval e. a c approval allow an increased lot £�, Qt?0 and 32, 0 ®0 eslua�e feet; 2 j ve�a, Lance a " rr�val t�� ai.le width to depth ratio on certain mate where a ratio of 2.5 :1 inn normally required; 3) a t$v ePermit to allow � velo eA t of �4 l lope that exceed 25% grade and; two Lot sine Ad uetm s« Approval Was granted for the northern 215 lots (Phase IIB) and the method for access to MW Bull Mountain Road Wag continued by the PlGmmning Commission and ball now be reviewed« Also, the applicant reeegv,ast% that the Planning Commission approve sub- phasing of what was originally referred to a Phase IX into seven sub- �phaae3. ZONE: R7 ( PD ) (Residential 7 unite /acre, Planned Development) LOCATION: Null Mountain Road and SW 139th Avenue at the south, and the existing southern terminus of SW 135th Avenue at the north edge of the anbdivision. (WCTM 2S1 9, tax lots 1.02, 1010 104, 200, and 2S1 4, tax lets 900, 1000, 1100) Attached irs the ;:,Rite Plan and applicant's statement for your reVidwn From information available to our staff, a report and reconmondation will be m other information e" - u 1 and front �.... Will dep . tmente and agencies , ed �a, varic��as to comment ,on this ae lication, we needy your co nts� the fu4ur 1 you YoU � May and a decielon Will be rendered on the ro osal i use the Space ace provided below or attach a separate letter to roi: rn yo toy �r c. Q' p 1 lLiIIm�aieilt tFJ . If ou_ are unable _ to redgond b the above d please phone the staff contact �. f thuyoureicomments and waif irm you coma Ments in writing ae soon as noted below With our corm posamible .. i y any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, OR 07223» PHONE: 639 -4171 STAL C 'dONliACT w Je %:iy,r...Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWiN 'a ITEMS !MAT APPLY 8 We have reviewed the proposal and have no ohieatione to it Please contact of our office. ?lease refer to the endlosed letter. Written Convent s q Nate of Person Cotmemti.ng: Phone Numbear. �I� - N � %I�w N FXCATIO1 LIST FOR ALL APPLXCATI0S NPO NO. (2) copies • CITY DEPARTMENTS Building official /Brd R. City Recorder .,.a Engineering /Chris D. Permits Coordinator /Viola G. . SPECIAL DDSTRICTS Fire District (Pick -hp boxy L.0/"-Tigard Water District 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Metzger Water District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED 'JURISDICTIONS Wash. 2 h. Co. Land Use & ransp. �C N. First Ave. 1Hial ,sboro, 01 97124 rent Curtis Kevin Martin Joann Rice Scott King Fred Eberle Mike Borreson City of Beaverton Jim Hendryx PO Box 4755 5eavertnn, OR 9017E State Highway Division Lee Gunderson PO Box 565 Beaverton, ' OR 97075 S. SPEC/AL AGENCIES General Telephone Mike Lutz 12460 Sirs` Main St. Tigard, OR 97223 NW Natural Gad Ronald D. PolvL, PE, PLS 220 NW Second Ave. Portland, OR 97209, TCI Cablev; s on of Oregon Mike HallocDs 3500 SW BOnd P brtland, C?R 97201 If- CPO NO. Parks & Recreation .,1011,4 Board Police Field Operations T 14,7 IA) we I F1-6146 ,(C04,4,s1,6 04)) Act school Dist No. 48 (Beaverton) JOy Pahl PO 'pox 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 School Dist. 23J f Tigard) 13137 SIN Paci fic Hwy. Tigard,, OR. 97223 Boundary Commission 320 Stank Roc l 530 Portland, OR 97204 ,..," METRO 2000 SW lst ave. Portland, OR 97201- 5393! .... DLCD (CPA's only) 1175 COu t St. NE Salem, OR _ 97310-0590 Other Poland General Elec. BrLan Moore 1.46 S SW Old Se4g110 PrY. Beavertoh4 OR 97007 it� Area Communications Jason 'Slerfiitt IAKrin Oaf technology Center 3,815 « 169th Place' 8-6020 teaverfran, OR 97008 -4886 UZ West Pet0 Nelson 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 97204 STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics 6 v. (ODOT) Engineer .--- , Hoard of Health - ... ,Pich & Wildlife Parks & Recreation Div. Subdivision Supervisor �._..._. Dept. of Energy 0ept. of Environ. Quality DOOM," Diviteion of State Lander Commerce erce Dept. . H. Park LCDC PUC 'ire Marshall Other • E'E) :RAL AGENCIES Corps. of Engineers Other post Office . OTHER Southern Pw ifa c Transportation Company Duane M. Forney, PLS Project Engineer G00 NW 6th Avenue, R. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 Main / o r LST J� f CITY OF 1IGARD� OREGON December ` 27, 1990 Mr. Tont Burton �� Survey Co. �` Engineering #302 ��,� o�n �n � neer�.n and 194 Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Burton; l am of ,� to the recent submittal of Phase 2H the Subdivision SUB 9p -0005 known as the Summit t Bull Mountain t Phase 2B. and Engineering Both the City of Tigard Planning Department and of the. subject Department have completed a preliminary re application and have deter :axed that the application as submitted �P � found in the is incomplet 4 The f® 11�r�r�.�� items are not ou application packet: 1) Proposed Public and private sanitary and storm sewer details 2) Propose profiles of the system Proposed p road sy " location , j t 3 ) Vicinity map sh ®�aa�ag the general �i� the subject ec property in collector r o. and other developments. � ants n ace�.ati ®��s�. to arterial and c streets aRn In light of th.' finding! ..._... tar City s review a.s the d� time frame , of development appliaaot has not yet begun for this proposed City " ly accepted thi t foxbYall L 1.� the (:.a. �. has n �applica application and therefore the review period has not het formally PP begun ) m Additionally, this preliminary staff review has identified an inconsistency �u�ith the P�rev�.o�asl number :sip of �°a. der for the a:nco � .. r nditi+�L��nua� approved Final nab: Order FO Bull .Mountain. C .o 90 10 PC f p... �7 pp, " 5 Summit a�� SUB 90►� p or the rev�ouaal. approved �u�di�� .� n �U :states Lots shall not be per , te t .. tad vehi On l a c � yonto t h e minOr . treet fro m anterse$onoh 1 Mountain Road to a ys intersection eiah Eench v, ew TerraCe. II Blvd,, PLO. Box 233.., Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503 . ,.. '��'I25 �'U%1TIP�I ' �� a X3941?9 • 1 1 The preliminary pant which has been submitted for ease, 2 3 worti4 permit direct accasa onto tha. a�3 :co1 ecto street Troia sax lots, (lot sets 308 ,. 3i3) ,k This destOn is in dice t ' conflict with tine previously ons l.y pproved . Vinai Ordigi . Tualatin ' a.11ey Vire 4 rescue t ' atat. co1►1�4erri 'pertaining to this cturent 's 3 iaiOn ,app1ic'at .0n are the s k. . 0 for the previous appr(s ral. S o wica ly; stz of grades shy , . not exceed 15 percent. This also: points to a ,defic4Nancy in the 'c runt application materials. in „that ,street grades are not specif i+4d. There ode, On may 'wish to reconsider • the adceSS 'provided tO bats 300:0.313 � g the the a e . its fire tog par dn��i� � e ,fie s brnLaeion 'tO the City 'If you have any quests ei s or concerns Please F contact t e Cl.ty ' o Tigard Planning or Engineering Department at G39 -41714 Ron Pomeroy Assistant P1 nner BURTON ENGINEERING AND SURVEY CO 11945 SW 'PACIFIC HIGHWAY 1302 TIGARD, OREGON 972221` PH (503) 639 -6116 FAX (503) G39 -'6117 March 15 , 1990 546 Flo - MAR 161990 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT: NARRATIVE TO ACCOMPANY PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLNT "BULL MOUNTAIN SUMMIT VIEW ESTATES PHASE 2" The Pro Posed ose R d subdivisin plat lies south of phase 1 and extends from phase 1 which lies south of existing S.W. 135th. Ave. and extends south to Bull Mountain Road.. This proposed subdivision area is approximately 97 acres and contains 276 lots, This proposed subdivision will be constructed in conjunction with the phase 1 portion. Construction of phase 1 and phase 2 will complete the extension of S.W. 15th. Ave from $.W. Wa 1 n ut St. through to Bull Mountain Road. Also the' S.W. 132nd. connection through tench View subdivision will be completed to Bull Mountain Road.. These streets are designed to minor collector standards. 111 other streets are designed to local street standards. Considerable effort has been made to work with individual neighbors, CPO group, NPO group and City of Tigard Planning and Engineering Departments in developing : this plan. Lot sizes have been p!anned much larger than required for this zoning ranging in size from 8.00 0 sq. ft, +- to over 32,000 q. ft. The lots have been designed for maximum view and compatibi 1 ity with somewhat challenging hillside topography. Sanitary sewer is designed to for gravity flow throughout Sewer on the easterly portion of the pro connect through ,�ect the phase 1 project, to the existing Bench View subdivision, to 3 Mountains Sewer recently constructed. The southerly portion of the project must be conn:eted to an existing sewer. located 139th. Ave. 700 feet 'Soy of Bull Nountain Road on pp. � y South o S.T. 139 Westerly portion o2 the project is planned to connect, through t' ie proposed Phase 3 and extend North on the Bonneville Power rjght of way to the intersection is Fer of and connect to an ry Road a existing sewer located lust North od Sc►,olls Perry Road. The proposed l drain to existing ..... drainagewas and r ealculationsxwill be submitted with final pans for proper sizing of on and offsite 'storm face) a� es Stree L maintained : , maximum of 12: grade exce � for the most m�re�lln . eti with a , tructaon c t cons V P stir lY street � n the project. , �e hereby request allowance of a 15 % grade on this street, being des , is i. Lys.. with s stem g Jp.1J g µ g� tags time in conjunction Water y i wed at t with Tigard Water District,: They have agreed to provide an adequate water supply and we are working jointl y to design the system. The :system is stmaewhat complex and beyond' the scope of this preliminary layout, Trees are an importat consideration for a portion of this project. We request the Bu l 1 Mountain Community plan be adhered to for dispos ition of the trees. This plan requires 'at least 506 of ex;st:ing trees be preerved during development's However, prior to development harvesting of anarketable trees is perbitted in accordance~:• with the Forest Preo.-rvaticii Act . The trees must be replaced wth suitable b1e trees of at least 1 1/2 inches in diameter. We request the prerogat „ve or being able to harvest the trees during the clearing process prior to development construction with the understandI ng thev will be replaced as specified above Removal f these harvestable ties would not daunt in the 50% preservation amount as spe c a f i ed or the Bu.` 1' Mountain Coinktruty plan listed as item 5 under design elements. Cats have been designed to prov de u building' area with maximum +i.» &w and preservation of natural trees and shrubbery. `Frees r�~ v,r.ni forml y dist /, -ibut� , on the northerl',v Portion of this project., The tree line i9Lh4 l c ations ar0 shown on the topographic me p T'he i ' are three major drra i nageways through this property. . Lots h . s . 6en_• ,designed with extra depth to reserve these areas �� n a natural state on the back p • .ate ��. � port i. ores of the lots The3e back portions .4 e thea'e fors: s l aped mo ~e. than 25% gr;; de : Also the length/width ra h: a o exceeds the 2 1/2 allowance We are therefore applying for a sensitive land permit for s) cpes in 'excess of 25% On these its as follows Lots 1 thru 11, Lots 42 thru 54, Lots 10') thru 123, Lots 128 thru 142, We � ►- i r„ y V i anoe for l ot�, 1 . e arF� app ly n�. for l erag�tY,�; /�„ ��ith rah <,� var, • thru L at. 95 ►..hri. 52, Lct.,� 132 thru 142': W0 also request a lot line adjustment to 8xtisfy some concerts and, requi 'emeints of n+eigl�,iz`�rs as fc�1 lci s + ca� her c�fL02 u :100 tcc�e rMti . the �o tl east co:•_ner '" p adds a 50 fev� str o� l�inti: t:o `�.La 1•G'0 � � tie ��sst side throughout �.ts gntre lencpti�. These `l°��:.� are ir�dic;ate��. ®.ii reap 2819 • An additional lot line adjustment is r q *lest4,, to alto 15 j feet two be added to Lot 1 lH� f'or C'� . L . :0th 1 This wou lid a l: l at �ecessa;�y t4 d.. lacy ,the rawer access to his ba�lr' �r�rd,. r�s:' T`:T . 1.00 i hewn on i . p 2 F : The 1►�et strip t. .1,t,: b taken f ~our T . L . 200 �s shown on 2S 1 9 snap [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]