The URL can be used to link to this page

SUB1991-00012POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. V3S ,aW a aUt 13125 '_ et 2S1 4 D, b & 28 4SD, 1500 *p7aNwkxd'i+acwc.,sa+ww.��uw nw. uw ..nw, .rvi,kar:t'y+'.a - •Cr, +�tlltiak n Jerry Offer, Planner city of Tiga.rd Planning Department PO Box 23397 Tigard OR 97281 Offer: realigned street 2. ► the Roes Meadows this agreements permits the revision of the Rose Meadows pxe:.i :nari plat and preliminary plat. ptell tlna?y plat a approVa,l, We hereby specifically waive any rig rigit inal plat, based We elsq agree to slab a revised p el igiinar plat which includes a strut alignment Mat:chin . tlierry Offer, Planner Nov :ib'r 11, 1992 Page 2 �r We alto acvree that, , in the event that we convey . our property, this agreement shall be binding obi buyers, uccesso "'s and assignees and that it Shall run with the land. ATTI:311NEYS AT LAIN BALI BVii "8R WRIGHT 137011DiNG 1727 N.W. H9r Street Itxtlandi Oreg!an 97209 TELEPHONE: (533) 222x$02 Mt ,(503) Zi -2944 CE OED PLANNING 1114 v AT : ng mina osl NOV 1 3 1992 DATB 0 November 11# 19 9 TO: Jerry Of fer r City Panne city of Tigard FROM: Michael C. Robinsone City Attorney's Office We discussed. preparing a letter whereby the owners of the land co rising the Hula: Mountain North prelamihary plat 'would agree to realign I:heir street match a new stub Rose Meadows That letter is attached. ]Tease review the letter and let me know if it is what you viant n Once the letter is signed, it should be Attached to both the Rose p arY plats dead ®w�, and Bull Mountain North � �exi��.h Original Memorandum to: Jerry Offer, City Plabner copy tot City of Tigard/CommunitY Development File CR a del 11/11/92 A"t"tar Men't L.CVDII0111 S T t MEEK° 7 +O 6+00 tizerr TO: Sub 91- 12 N illeJc FROM Creg Berry DATE: April 2, 1992 SU JECT a Drainage onto William's lot Mr. Wiliams, 13865 SW Fern, Handy Acres #6 L 16000 230 -5929; has requested him of the it would been �'�: of his parcel. `, I 'told a whit ,�, sted to grant a drainage easement ��ean to the development � o1d p�:,abl.ems of discharging to along his north property line as currently proposed since this is likely to become the back lot lines of future lots. Suggested that the drainage should be in t he future extension tead Also discussed water quality problems .:. nd h w the uncertainty of the location of future streets makes plu.nn$. q difficult. He will discuss this further with applicant and �:cight have Harris call us. HARRIS - MCMONAGLE AaL a INC ENGINEERS - U V ` OR$ 12555 S.W. HALL BLVD. TIGARDr OR. 97223, dose Meadows Date: 7- 10 -91 Enclosed is a copy of the pre1iabifarY Plat for Rose Meadow' Lots 1 thru 12 are in an area with an Imi�% solar gain lots marked. )it�s�n �� b �� . 0 �0 � �. � �, i � � Lots East -West slope exceeding 10% per e �' �� need � - connecting 18 thru 28 are faced in an East es M directions due to the approves alignment road to the north, Or a .North-South road between S.W. ?ern and S. W. Walnut and due to restrictions im osed b►y the site existing marls - and should be exempted �t�� ti�t� der section 18. 88.040 � ��t� ��car�� 80.09►0 a 1. a . The raiing lots are faced in a North-South direction with or % ��.t�c��t�� basic ��la dimension of more than 90 feet, thus meeting requirement uhder section 18.88.040 C.1. STAFF FEPORT TO THE AAINGS OFFI( R MONDAY, AUGUST 26, 1991 - 7:00 PM TIGAR CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 Sri HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 0722:3 . SUMMARY OF TBE Its:QUEST CASE: Subdivision SUB 91 -0012 - Rose Meadows B preliminary plat approval �tY m The applicant �e�eat® subdivision r plat divide an approximately 4.97 acre site into twenty lots ranging in size between 5,000 and 120630 square feet APPLICANT: Patti Miller Route 5, Box 62 Sherwood Oregon 97140 di /Mg Same AG1 NT: Uarraa �cM ®x��3e �� eoc�ate a, Inc (Bill McMola gle) 12555 SW Hall Blvd T1gardo ON 97223 CCMPRBMENSYV PLAN DESIGNATION Medivan Dean;eity ReeidentiRal. 20NIW DESIGNATIG0: 11,-7 `Reeideantial, 7 units/4dies) LOCATION: 13735 SW Walnut Street (Wc41.4 24X 4400 t vc Lot 400) 13275 SW Fermi Street (WCTM 2S1 4BD, Tax 1500) y pt . . 18452, 18. . ciea � �38�, 3.�C.92, 18 108, APPLICABLE LAW. Gcaaunmanit Develo ent Cade Ch►e � �r® 18.150, 18.160, 18.164, Compr4 henaivo Plan Pol3� 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 4.3.10 7.1.2,' 7.3.1, 7.4,4,- B.1.1, and e.1.34 and the Bull Mountain Coaununity Plan. STAPF .3 COMMENDATIMe Approval eUbjeot to condat,ion®. /7. PIi D NGS ABOUT SITE AND SURE 0UNbINGS Sites a and_ittapet . NV north-south . .,.. by l et . 8.64 acres and is approximate 340 y�e640 Tam lot 400 Tam lot ��i� contains e end �.e 170 ��e t ea�� eet north-south by 340 feet east,, ,eet w Co lesnisereamssze filete lesee L.on: The site is located on the norre sid © SW 'Fern Street, pprro imately Street, 500 feet west of SW 135th Avenue. SW Walnut Street ,etuba into the eastern edge of tax lot 400. Both SW Fern Street and 00 Walnut Street are local streets under the jurisdiction of Washington l unty., Adjacent parcels are all within Vashington Caanty except for an approximately y 60 acre parcel to the north which is within the city. Ex i8tters uq S aY9d structures: Both paecelA, contain single family residences as indecated on the preliminary lat. The remainder of the site is open with only a few trees located near the two residences. S[°�JO~"al atnad dr gage S The site slopes to the west and northwest NO distinct drainageways are present. r. Plan ded . rnati.oit and_, zon in ' a City final The subject site was only x' ,Jr'tlasnn��. Metropolitan 1.it�'s ?�oxaxdary �si.s�s�f.on approv 1 being granted by the on May 30,1991. The City Council had approved the annexation and a pp lication of City of Tigard zoning and Comprehensive Flan designations on March 26, 1991. The site and the adjoining property to the �®rtn are designated ed i ediu u Densit � Residential on the city of Tigard" s Comprehensive Plan Map. The parcel to the north also contains areae further north that are designated for Medium-High p Density Fen idential use aid ifeighborhood Commercial. Zonin g for the sub ject site is R - 7. Thd property y to the ;, t Borth contas3aris� R-12, Ft 25, and C-N zoning with the Planned iDevelo �n overlay Neighboring parcels to the east; West. and south of the subject pr ►petty are designated Residential, 6 Units Per Acre by Washington County' la Bull Mountain sub The plan. Community site was also inoluded within the � The j planning' area for Washington County° a null Mountain Community Plan. Although not bound by specific implementation strategies of the County' s p lan a - d development ��o nxation; the City utilizing the techniquess of the OLty ° s den►ei ®pent review process. lifteWrilr llYl ��avma0a�.�r'+w�T ^o. °� The sita is with .,an Mitotai grid hoggregats Di ettiOt on the Community Platt which s noted impact area from 'existing or 'potential mineral/aggregate extras � g q i locaed to the west of the ei.te bet ScholleFe r Read end Now. Schol.e Perms Road. SINGS OFFICER SDR 01 -0012 e ROE MEAD 6 Propertie4 to the south, west ;. and east contain single far alit, residences. 'Thar parcel to the north is pri m l.y a large ':open field ''altboaltgh some tt ates are foanci directly north of th oub5ect site. G. ErmoossUIEL3r, The applicant proposes to divide the site into tweaty iota ranging ng in six trom 5,000 to 12,6110 square feet ar illaitaltr A ted on the Preliminary plat. The lots are intended for single family resident3,; l use. The existing houses would be retained and would be on lot : >> iuc].udea ,within'' the subdivision. IIA i e, ,9g. 10111t d The 1)telittlintilcIt utUity ►l.an proposes that the attbdimibiort be . sew W d by ne roc wrri i0hin sW W lnut Street*. Storm drainage. Bases art proposed hi n the pro posad new .trees 'draisitig to an open natural dra .,rage ay ' approxii t &ly .100 feet to the west of the northwestern corner of the site. Water :service wound also be extended fitcat an erietina 1 too i;u SW Fero Streets .streeta..and access The Site haS 470 feet Of frontage along a W Fern Street. mW Fern Str ^.,et recently has approzirnately 25 feet Of • right - ofeaway width and 10 feet f pavement from centerline idewaikb curbs, ar ptor la d 'ani s. A but no p nary subdivision . plat.. notes t aa.�: half' Street improvenenta The r�►Zi.�ii�. �a►itln 1.7 feet of pavement are intended.. to b'a installed aaloit 3 the Bite's SW Fern Street frontage. the sub iviSion would • ii,Itotive the creations Of a^ westward exte on. Of SW Ua .4u,t Street terminating at She western edge of the ,aite,r a short stag. street to the north, and a spine ^ street eutending nOrt -Nsottth through the site. The typical Street section cn the preli min plat indicates that these atreets are intended tea be ccnattructsd to fall be alhalfer�treoa�witans,17' except t the � nerther�rin $401.6i 5► �oo� r' � pac�ioaed to which i of � g � �. t of a!�e�nt in a 2 �. hb of� -w�, .�a an addition, a c6anaon driveway is proposed to Serve propcaaed :mti, 6 throw 9 � die 24 foot t w$ce 'common driveway r aaacd be lc ated in Shares o nerahi p private a drive tract tD at wiroul d 0 to 32 Set 5i The private drive would be quite s&io but would expan into 'a ha0m0±he &d shaped turnaround area. HEARINGS OFFICER SDR 91 --0012 - r0 (g5 h00w III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS CcumminttEiR222122%211t-g2424 Chapter 18..52 containZ standt.A\rds for the R-7 ;acne. A single- family detached residential unit is a permitted use ft a th,t, zone.. Detached single...family residential lots in the zone must Comply with the following dimensional requirements: Maim= lot .ize 5,000 square feet Average 11011.1111.1101174111 lot width 50 feet Front setback 15 feet Garage setback 20 feet Interior lot side setback 5 feet Corner yard setback 10 feet Rear setback 15, feet Maxilla= building height 35 feet 2. Chapter 18.S8 contains solar access standards for new residential development,. A lot complies with this section if it has a vtorth.. south dimension of 90 feet or more and hat, a front lot 1in& that is oriented within 30 degrees of a true east-west axis. Additionally, a subdivision complies with this basic requirement if 80% or more of the newly created lots meet or exceed this standard. a. Code per4.'ion 18.88.040.B (Adjutstments.. to DiEi I. (01 Standards) states that the approval authority Shall reduce the percentage of iota that must . comply with Section 18.88.040.0 (Detiqn Ste.'1dardel) to the minimum extent necessary 1.f it finds tk,,e applicant as shown it would redue'ge density, 'Aignificazitly increase developtant cost, or eliminate amenities, or if shad:. from °lasting tees already obstructs solar access for a particular lot. 3. Chapter 18.92 cotitaind altaridardS for density. ,. The number of dwelling units permitted is bailed on the net development area, excluding Sensitive land areal; and land dedicated for public roads or parks, or 'f or private roadwaye, T detOrlaine the number of lots, divide the net dtiNelOpment area by the Minimum parcel size permitted by the zolling district. 4, Chapter 18.108 cOn,P4aitts access ,standards • Private colon driveways are permitted tn serve up to six dwelling units subject to pat/ether* width irt.ci improvement ittand;Vddits that 'vary with the nultber of dwelling tAnite served. Common driveways Serving two residences must have a Minitnunk:Iptelnament width of 20 goet Within minimum 25 foot wide acce:s tradt,i; 24. f,20of.., of pavement, curbs, an a .sidewalk on one P:iidt:1 is required for private street serving 3 to 6 dwelling Unit,,A. Turnaround areas are required for private streets in excess ok 150 feet 'in length. ; ; • HEABINGs orrIcER son 91-0012 - nz,62 MBADOWs wireporaIMIGIBMWEESIMPIEMEIMEWASIOUNIllift Chapter 18.150 requires a perMit and contain etO;a'ndard a for regoval of trees heaving a trunk 6 latches' or store diameter four feet above the eroun4 on undeveloped: lender A it for tree removal. must aCmply • with th e following 4:.. -:Lteria d a. The trees ar& diseased, Present a danger to PtoPertY, or interf „re with rioiCa or tre2fic afety; b. Th a trees b e le to be removed to co aetruct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's p ; operty in a reasonable manner It • Tha tr =es are not needed to prevent erosion m n ta,bility, or draainag- problems; • The trees are na needed to pro sect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable baa a nce, between shade and open space; • The a= dt.e is char :. ate in the area will not be visually advex'aely affected ected by the tree removal; and • New vegetaticAt planted by the applicant, if an , will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be _ out, Chapter 1�v1 0 contains standards for land divisions. It allows p phased devi celopment, provided construction is in, t tiaated Within eighteen g months of the appxl and construction of each phase does . not eas;ceed a 2 years. To6 be approved, a prl 'tlig! inary plat must comply with the following criteria: a. it must Comply with the City a corinprehens'.ve P'7, , and the applicable zoning ordinance nce aTad other applicable ordinances and regulation9 b. The proposed plat name is not duplicative or hertLse atiafies the provisions of ORl Chapter 92; e. The streeta and roads are laid cut so as to doraforma to the Plats of en/04ivisions acrd maps Of major Partitions alreadY approved for djolnin )ropia ty aS to width, general direction and Jai all other 'reepecra unless the City determinea's it icy in the ;-- bl .c iAtereitt to modify ` ho street o3; toad pat:,terr. ... • Chapter 18.164 contains st andards for streets • Section 18.1646030(A) re010, area streets within and adjoining a rlQeve�lgr�a�p�njern�t�} toys be�, dedicated t�i�� %r�rer�, basest �►ai classification of the street. HEARINGS oFPIcER SDR 91-0(12 a ROSU PlEAD0Ws e • Se^tion 11.164 4 ®3O (12) requires a legal Street to have a m nI m 50m.foot .igD t- dg -k�a ` and 34 -foot paved Je tion /46twleen curbs 'and s dewalke. ▪ i e i►n l �.,� . 4 3O(F) states that where necessary to gives acceste or' psrmtt a satisfactory future ' div i.01,On of adjoining land, streets shall be exten `,ed to the boundary', line of the tract to be subdivided. In as (itton, a reserve Strip and barricade axe required at thr, end of a dedicated € treet. that can be a itended off -site. � y Section 10 a 64 . ��g (a � mt�tt o � that. pa tia1 Str et it�avenents reeuStix� a v le60 than 24 feet, while generall � M o.dept ablei izoayle apprOVec where essential to dev "'7elop5nt.. and, when It will be practical to reequiree thep roventent of the other ha►1f When the adjoining pao sty d eveloped. 6 6OCt3mn 18164,030(M) reqxiraa loeai Street gr a1os of 12% or lege. Eo ^' a c."tion1 18.164.060 prohibit® lot depth from being tr re -than 2, tizae the lot width and reqtaires at least 25 .feet of 'frontage on a s treet other than an ai.ley« . Section 18.164.070 ree4uiret3 eidewal ks adjoining all local Ire: .sleesnti.al streets h. geotio n 16.i64,000 reg.*iree sanitary Sewer Services i. section 184164.100 requir/ A ' adequate proviaione for ctoto water runoff and dedioati+: ► of easeementB for stores , ra vage faCU.itiee. A 1ica blo CO Q 1. Policy 2.1.1 provides the amity Will assntee. citliene wi11 be pro4*' Napo �y of the arrded an ca x�tun�.�. � to be involved in a13. phas ®® Planning prose ®e• ▪ Policy 4,2,1 requires that d evelepme l proposer® COMPlY with aPPlicable federal; state o and wader tst nc ar e. 3 City daiiire de�'a1O nt . .... has 1.1 r ®" ..�.t�Y 4 1 stated that the 0�t �► prop®sal s located in a nai.ee con ested at.'ea to incorporate the following into the site plans • rehensive_ Plan Police building laceaieni�t on the site in an area where the noise 8' P levels Will have a mainimal. impact; 1 '` ��; .... noise aif►pac s -- ,lam�.isca3�ii�g and rather techni q e td le�a��en d, land p .. the a�lun: r�._.... g to levels ce��i...atxn�l�r with ING 8 ®FFIcER CDR 01-0 0112. - X08$ MDQWS Policy 7.1.2 provides the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm d citinage will be provided and designed to City ®tandarde and utilit3.�e�a placed underground. • Pcalicy 7.3.1 provided tth City, will coordinate water services with water districts. . Policy 7.4.4 development to be c onn feted to an approved sanitary sewer system. • Policy 8.1.1 provides the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meats current needs and anticipated future growth and devrelopmeat._ • Polies 8.1.3 provides the City will require as a precondition of approval that: • Development ab zts a dedicated street or has other adequate access ' • Strom right -of -way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; • The developer shall coat ta`r construction of the streets, curbs and sidewai a to City standards wLthth the development • The developer shall participate in the' improvement of existing streets, curbs, and bite 4/i'a1ks to the extent of than development's impact .c., • Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is fotnad to create or iintenAlfy a traffic hazard. Bull Mountain Commni lity Plan A copy of taaahinttn Connty' a Du]- Mountain Ct;i1IMUnktIr plan will b provided for the Hearings Officer's reviet, with this staff report. The, Planning Division office. Plan i:� available for review at the City Bull Mountain Coo unit. 1 g } The City of Tigard Bna i,inieeri ng bepartment haS reviewed the pro eal. offer ia th =. f of ldw$;'ig comments:, a. streets Acceaa to the site is pr ovided fry se +a. r aJ'li.t 3t. And S. t1. , .,. �'ari t 'both of which are accessed from S.W. 135th dive. eD� HERR -Nds Drp ±CE! ;' SBR' 91-0012 - ROSE iiRRIDONS 4 If S.W. Fern. St. is currently under Washington County . juriedic tion except Ia' of Tigard ad ji ent to the proposed development. where it Ilia rider City jurisdiction. S.W. Fern St. currently has 550 far: °kt :,t v r .g ¢t *f -wayo approxivarLi t ily 24 feet Of pavement, acid ditche,3 on both ei dsa of thre road for drainage, The applicant hafts propoa thd to 4astall hal.,E -- street ovemearntw along the fro Cage of the sit* that Meets City of '�,�tgarde O iaaapr � � � th.�a+a local street aataa lards. The Faaegine�aring Aepartalent raw :ignites .but i. a1,ao under the opinion road is jinder two iffolretnt jilriediCtionsr b that some 'time in the future the entire .road wi3.1 be the responsibility of the City of Tigard., Therefore, the applicant should be required to: . provide a profile of S4W. Fern St. which ebowwe the (W,isting grade which ,meets Cityma centerline and gravid ®a proposed grad Standards for local. streets, . provide, AS a minitnuaano half street imgroveuaent® a�.aang S.ir�. St. ,, l street Fern to snatch the g� adle that gIB�;!�ts lace etandarde S.W. walnut Street currently dead ends at the east end of the propo Teti ;<'nC� the Bit�4�e'� to the die ® ©lopata�aealnt. The applicant •i,® proposing Cori ext plicar�t should extend ,he deve1o�r* Therefore, p asset end .Of t freak its Current termianus too the west and of the proposed S.W. �lalnaat fr y Tigard eat ,�tandardas deveio ent and build it d local Street, pM to City of Via. ar required the applicant to chow an ease p Si n Of thee read eyateaan to the h , this Wad g aired because a exteatn ®nort �� ,` wed a street exteansiUn to preliuminary plat, approval (See SOB 99.94 y: eh® the South. This pretti.ou®ly, approved street actu ally splits the wreak: pM adjoining property to the property. Line: of this d ®vela ant sand the complied with requirement and had shown weot The-applicant �hacomplied with t he north which a vetches with the approved' plat for SUB 90-04. �n add eh'own half,istreet ., , t iton the applicant h+�® a e�.r�et ext� Av �; on to ,,� be, that if the improvements for this houle. noted development to the north is hu extension., city would have a a�ituation where I es to the north j oinifg ' a ha l street to the there iii a full. width street �eacaf ®re , the . � t® install o craandition eolith en the .... subjeCt site wh � h ie' a unseat half- ®treat improvements to ire • l�'>'calu®N.oteet uta hr rcWLth the following exeep` ion.,' the pavemnSot width Pay 'Standards With eI ould 114 a >o inituia of 24 feet b. Sanitary Sewer There is an existing eanitaa`y sewer 13.ne, S £uch, located � ' h . � i� 3 6�.. �l��t Ave The e$iaLinc has e uf ficignt ca p ae it y t o h�211® thin s devetopanant c. Stc:OL O Ar ainage d,ir .. tort i:nag . , , notthb�lat The applicant .. into � .�. act the e � dra � e to the this development into an exi:etin , g is proposing j em, of d be re .. , ired� try deaa►�. notate t � c the Therefore, the applicant shoal hR x:I�iGS oFFIONti SDR X31 -0912 ROSE MEADOWS fJ ti. 0. Pre Dosed ey®tem does not significantly impact downstream properties. . : Tigard Water Dinrr3.00 bets camieentaad that high greeaure and . gravity systems will be rec aired within the proposed development. Northwest Natural Gas has reported no objections to the proposed development but notes that a 10 inch diameter high pressure gas line runs adjacent to the northern boundaries of proposed lots 15 through 18. The City Tigard Building Division has provide the following of ��. asrd Bui�.d comments: Prior to issuance of building permits, a report from a registered engineer shall be subakitted. The repox t shall indicate the location of any fill placed on building sites, suitability of the soil for building construction, and soil bearing capacity. A sewer permit shall be obtain gd prior to the ' connection of the existing houses to the sanitary sewer e Private storm drains shall be provided for lots le 2, 10, 20-28, easements shall be provided where crossing o± r lots. A joint access and maintenance agreement shall be recozded with each lot accessing a private storm drain. As follows: Lots 1, 2, 100 20 -28, shall have an equal :.cigbt to use and an obligation to operate and maintain the private drainage facilities within the private or public drainage easem - ntsa as shown. The finish grade of the lots shall til mofh steeper o 2slope. or the engineer shall certify the y Thies will include the slope and fill from the excavation for the foundations of the structures. 9 plan shall be submitted to the Building Di.vieion, showing the, location of all Underground private uti.li.tiee for the existing buildings. If the utilities croas over, new property likes, they Shall be provided with easeruer;-: e, Rain drains shall dieobarge to an approved system. * The private drive Eihotilfi be paved prior to issuance of building permits, Or monetary performance assurance should be provided. The i.nstal.atioh of the drive should be inspected by tine Engineering Departmient 5. The Tualati 'Valley Firre and :Redone Dietriet has reviewed the preliminary plat and bee commented that °ono parking°° eigna should lse posted along the ht erg end turnaround Serving Iota +S. 0. The eigna should State "L'ire Lane, Tow away Zone„ ito Parking, ORS 98.81 48.912." The eigue should be placed close enough tO indicate that the entire area IA a prohibited ted parking arOir HEARINGS OFFICER OOR 91 -0012 ROSE MEADOWS l ?f * # 7 has reviewed the. p+ropo al and supports the proposal. ' The NPO recommends that the developer he a equired to construct full street improvements to Walnut Street betwe4 n the site and SW 135th Avenue in order to accommodate the proposed subdivision's additional traffic demands. The City of Tigard Operations Division, E, and GTE have reviewed the proposal and . have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been raceiv d. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST compliance .with _Co u1.,, ni ., jievelop +ent Vie. .. Th: :4, proposed aa ►division complies with the use standards of the R -4' zoning district because the lots, are intended -to to be used for single family detached dwelling use eta. The 54,000 to 12,630 square foot lots are consistent with the minimum 5,000 square foot rnifamuaa lot site of the zone and the average lot width requirement of 5p feet. The. existing. ng. resides ces on Vroposed lots 1 and 15 would meet applicable building Setbacks of the RRZ zone. y Thi applicant has submitted. a copy of the preliminary plat with !r s � .slope percent and slope orientation analysts as W011 as existing t'r'ees that affect the solar access calculations for the proposed development. . A letter dated July 15, 1991 accompanies the map providing the applicant's summary . of how the proposed, lots are. intended 'to comply with the solar access requirements of Chapter 18.80. This letter is 'attached attached to this staff report as appendix A. Staff differs with the applicant's analysis with regard to a number of the proposed lots. Staff finds that propostd Lots 22 through 26 should be exc laded from the solar access calculation as the 20.pexcent of lots that need not be considered withi4 the polar access calculation. Proposed lots 13 through 1I meet the basic solar access requirement because these . lots have ' a front lot line that within 30 degrees of true east -west a.tid a mlnimum north-south dimension of 90 feet. Therefore, only 36 p,ercent of the proposed lots meet the basic design standard, rather than the S0 percent required la" � Code section 18. qu y _ 88.040. The solar access requirements in section 18.88.040 (E (Ad juste eats tv Design staa;c'dards) state that the approval authority Shall reduce the pottolatage of lots that must c tapry with Section 18.8 ( ) t eig Stand�i6 rds) to the m nimum 8,� 0�� c Pie extent necessary it finds the applicant hag shown it would o auae o is subject to one or more Of following condi ions HEARINGs OFFICER SDR 91- X0012 . t0$E MBAD64S Portion � for 'which the adiustaa t is sought �. 7'h® rt��aatn oaF the site has a natultel grade of 10% or greater and IS oriented greater than 45 degrees east or west of true * ou'E h; 2) A need to protect significant natural fegiti res 3) Existing road Patterne must continue through the site or most terminate on the site to c:eply with aPpiiea►le road ,f,03tari4L=oris in a way that Prevents given streets or i.ote in the d®velo pant from being a�rf ®need for solar access; 4) �hn existing - Public eas eaent or right -ofs -way prevents given streets or lots, in the developaaeint from being oriented for solar access. Staff concurs with the a applicant ° a aaealyeie with regard to an ad jwast snt being warranted for' iota 1-7 and 1O -12 due try the northwesterlY oriented 1>m addit:�c�n, staff concur s � in excess of 1 ®� for these .,lots.' that an adjustment is warranted for lotet 8 and 9 due to the necessary private road design to serve lots 6-10 and any alternative dea3iy' n for this area cawing loss of a lot. However, staff fails t,r see why lots 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, and 28 cannot be reoriented towards SW Walnut Street and SW Fern Street in order to be better oriented > for solar benefits. It appears that reorientation of the a lots towards these east -west streets will *- cows standard of section �18 in 88 meeting 0404 Co �. wither significantly negatively impacting the value of these late, if at all. Reorientation of e t .. .. required aae a condition of a these lets should be r approval of the subdivision proposal. 3. The proposed subdivision complies With the dnefty . etandaards of Chapter 18.... foot net developable atea of the site A after daducti0ara 18.92 becaau�e �,he 155:150 ,a�area< e � � r tbof-way decliot�tin and the private ata�`Qeie tract) yieldaa an Apo y - unit for thitty.t cae dwelling unite under the Tt- aiaiaiac , designation. twenty-eight singles fatraily reeidentiaal lOte are *Opovede . y , g t.xrot 11 .ta the proposed private caeea►o;ee dar�a�rewa. �,ar�.tn lots 5 ' p t Chapter 18.10S for a i4*iato dri*eweynaerry " up tea elk dw a .lin �' 9t F g uaaits t the accee>e tract Will exceed 30 feet Lin width, the roes way t4il1 be at .least 24 keet in width, and curbs and a es.eewal c will be provided. However, the PrelleleilltY plat ihdicatea that this drive ii1l serve seven dwelling unities. A vehrience has not beer regneeted to allow the drive to serve more than the .acimn si r ,diiaro'et.1 g to ste' a1�l,c dm p . , w f .. plat � � .. fie for no amore Shan ��.sita E� 10 a and eitl at ao 5le r lot 11 to be #16001 by tote °,p4trete drLue. The etoluded lot can be eerved by the eaorth south .eica�.` eitaei� et (called Aoi3e lE 8adowa Lane on the plat) to the, west.. HEARINGS OFFICER ' SPt '91 -0012. nosh MEADORS t The preliminary plat appeeta to ebb); the required dideWa1k i a twO unconnected' gee tione 4pp3 oval o 'the , prelia ice` plat dhOuld bd Conditioned upon. the private drive /ei deWa1lk tract. and improvement® being redesigned' to provide for % centiliuoug sidewalk 1 etweon the torthi -sou p l pudic 'street itind,einh. of lOtit 6 through 10. T410 i . late' etr'eet ai a t3^ hotald be re ai red to b sign ed .1110 parking_ lan 4e neeead'to Maintain 20 fOot vide i through the eastdwaot portion Of the private drive. the r ivatee ! drive should alao be required to be ei gfed a i a private dr; ve and not a maintenaeoe and po1ining reaponsi bi.l.ity of thP, City of Tigard. Chapter 18.150 requires that the. nu nix i>lchea is�nbes ®f course �v�r' ` trees 0 in diameter that are removed during the cour yonatruction be minimized,•. No 'tree removal, +r rate grading should be allowed to Occur, prior to Planning Dividing() 'review and approval of a tree pe ry to be removal. raua.t. A detailed 'tree 3.n� ®ntea.. will need submitted prior to final plat approval or ieauanc,e Of a tree reMoVal, per alit. )i1102:' >aodifidations to the design May be necessitated in order to protect significant tneee b p.. po feistent with •t' +c irementa o The proposed avbdivi.aion �.� co the a..e Chapter 18.160 tenauset a. The prOppoded eubdiviaien coaepliea With the V . e �.a�apreh+en€niv� Plan Map a Medium Deng ity Resf;,dential deeignat3,on' a density opportunity . ... d ac��nsionai�. r�h the a�ppli.cable for the ,site aye Well as pan po11h ie 3,ease use akdi r.. la g atione of the 11,1 tone, and h r pp tions b. Thhe pro sec liaise of the eubdiVidion, Rose Me du duplicative of any Other plat recorded in Washington in tot .. gt p �iahin on county The proposed extension of SW Walnut Street , ` ind the other p tO e a ed : ataeet a will. prOVido for adequate and daft) aoce8a through the proposed Subdivision. These etreetd Will be re iced to bit im p r ®ved t® l0c4 etc eet stand d Within the eubdivieion. The requiated roves eli " the' t .te's SW Fern street frontage Wul improve traffic safety alc5ing this etretch of this nattgw road The street chub along the northern edge Of the parcel; will ali gn with an approved steet location on the prtipertY to the north. That attest has yet to bei Cone tri cted. The preliminary plat approval for dividnc the parcel tai the north ad valid intil NovenbQr 11, 1991 and the a p rt init exiete for a one ytlar extendLon of this approval per i.od' (Std 90 0004/PDf 90-4,0004)4 lRI GS o F,T(.1 a• SD It MEADOWS , . • Tiv4 propoued subdivision i,n consistent 'with: the re u riamo its of Chapter '4 e consistent with these p� ►err 1�.1.��4, or �a� � �a'�diiP,i� . t�dr' ons requitsMents, because: a. The applicant will be required to improve the 'SW Vern Street frontage of the site to City heal street, standards. b. As of, completion of this report Co>a ents had not been received from Washington County relative to off -site improvements to Walnut Street Or 'Fern Street Staff hopes to have the County's comments by the time of the hearing on this proposal: City staff does nOt believe that the traffic impacts of the propose • subdivision would be significant enough to warrant requiring the developer to provide street improvements tWalnut Street, as the recommends. The existing Street imP rameets ® with the overlay proposed by . the applicant, should be adequate for the amount of traffic anticipated for this street after the proposed subdivi3ion is developed. • Internal streets will be requi.,d to be developed to City of _. Tigard a taadards. The applicant's preliminary plans for developing internal nubdivsioe streets are consistent with Code standards for local street width, grade, turn around areas, and improveeento. The proposed lots are consistent with Code atandardia for maximum lot depth-to -width ratio and other :dot dimensional standards. ▪ The proposed sanitary and stores sewer system provided ;for logical collection eyctelbs through the developMent. Approval of the preliminary plat should be conditioned upo the applicant demonstrating to the satisfaction of the g ion that disposition of the to ter. drainage Engineering Di.vi® from the development can be discharged Li sting drainageway to the west without significantly Eti pacting the intervening propertied or downOtream propBrtiOs. It May be & e Q e sent fat and dQCe ® a� ®ry for the applicant to obtain an ®a constuct a storm & &ain across the intervening property to the drainageway Gams Bence . Ti ith Comarehon e. Plal Policies 1. The eUbdivieion is consistent with Poif;by 2:161 bedeUde foticee o$ the appli.c . �.... � tine ,. , , .... � . d. to P ers ciif ation ane the lio f�earin on this item was s c.iid g the ,od planning organisation axe Bite aeiHo td t�9e! ri0i. hnorYlo property in the vicinity o, . n f,- the Mite. The propod�ed posted with a sign noting that a land use orw develapeerat application On thid site rise pending, ggARINGs opPlc n SD1 911 -0012 R0s p MthOoWS ,, • J • ,1 .tl 2 . In order to comply with Policy, .4.2.1„ a condition Le warranted to pe prepare oo control. require the proepeetir�e developer' eve�.o r to r® aru► au3 erosion w plIn ensuring ccc pliance with eroetien control h land li 'for the 7, u�11atin River. basin . as part of the . grading permit pp oat .on. Staff findd that there are no practical iuethode, for i, nplementing` • the objectives of police 4.3.1 related to noise sensitivity of the proposed single family re iidenti development: of • this ®ubdivi®ion. The site slopes towards the west in the general direction of the Morse Brothers rock quarry, the primary noitat generator in this area. Because of the natural elope of this site ..and the relatively dnukll size of the lots, staff does not find that there will be opportunities for building placement on the ,lots in ways that will, reduce potentia"l� abide ii pact4 of the quarry" no wotald bcr .ng or round wills on the 'west ei.de of the r'y'r development 7 o e any beneficial effect in reducing Poise impacts. In addition, Staff does not find it practical or desirable to require City review of Landdeaping of individual lots with respect to leavening noise impacts on tits future residences or to require tho 'developers to landscape the reaidenceea in advance' of .occupancy. . City of Tigard . a Community Develo ent Cede arid the Tigard The � � Y � Municipal Cede provide regulations that Might impact noise generators, but not noise receivers, as is the situation presented g g g f the city and ..with the si niaC3.cant. n ®iBe generator the potential ip acted . pro rties being Within the city. The City bein oi�tsi.de o of Tigard Building Official reports that the Building Division is unable to . retlui re any special buv.ld1,74 eonat .-uction technique® to this site unleee legiel,attively directed. Staff, the efore, a finds ,th, � , . no practical way to pr ovide e�pecial lementation of P nt Of this site other. olio y �.3.�. to dev ®lo p'e e than to avk the developer .and the Building and Planning Divieiond to y proopeatiVe home bUilderd and. residential f4hat the • subdi ion! • le located within the 4ineral and Aggregate i pact overlay dietrtct. 4. . This nubdivieion proposal cornplie8 with policy 7.1.2, 7 43.10 and 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend piiblf,o Sewer and water p gam" stun y ®to thin situ and will revise fear under :round i,aaafi bll. e stem Of - phone, electricity, and cable televie►ion �inee. . The subdivision propoSal complies with Policy 81.1.1 and 8.1 .3 because the propo®ed improvements to the atreete within the au►bdivieian will be consistent with City of Tigard etai da rde for local titree� .. S donei ete ..with: Bu11 Mountain Co Agunit .Ilan Staff had reviewed the design eieluents .. swamis and e Pere the ' �'l.r�ia�ei subarea of the Bulb Y nd no re.,. irentn a l Mountain C;r�aaunit plan hnd has feu qu icable to the an b ect site that ate not covered b 1 `° y dote rehennive P pp � P of Tigard Commua�ft. _i�evelo cut. Cade or p � 9 Y .AE111%1406 OFFICER SA � CW$ la 0012 SE N R 91- Therefore, we conclude that consistency of the propoaed development with City .Plan and Code standards is tantamount ta cone&eteacy With the Bull Mountain Community Plan Other Issaes ou h Planning Division's attention .at the counter thast It was brought to the � It g near t uu¢l fuel t � »t n eon. tax lot 1500, will is not clear exactly where this fuel tank ;is located or whether it be com letely on lot 1 upon subdividing. Fuel tanks are permitted uses 9 remain, in the 1��-7 zoning district and thus should. be allowed to provided that the exact location of the tank can be ascertained prior to the issuance of a grading perMit for the site. The tank should be required to be removed if its location would cross a a property line upon recording of the plat. If not, the tank should ba allowed to remain conditioneC upon its exact location being accurately staked if any site grading or other construction is to occur within 115 feet of the tank. VI. The , Planning Divi.E modifications, e;11,111 significantly detritn;;,;, development that .coin and fede -al laws. cONcLVSION AND RECOMMENDATION coracl.ucles that the proposed subdivision, with mote the general welfare of the City and will net be 1 b:or inliarious to surrounding land Usnea, provided that after thiil decision complies with a ppli mabie local state Staff recommends approval of Sub&'visicn proposal SUB 01 ®0012 for the proposed' Rt,ee Meadows 'subdivision suJ��ect ' to the candt3one Which folloW. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS Sanwa BE SATISFIED AND PUBLIC IMPEOVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED OR COMPLETION SHALL BE PRT ; TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUBDIVISION. (Staff cotAt3 t for all recommended conditions in Chris Davies of the Engineering Department, 639 4171, unless otherwise noted). THE APPLICANT SHOuLtt DE REQUIRED , TC$ coMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY: . . be limited to the creation Of no Mora than f��'t nty-� 1 e The final plat Shall b � fully i plat . �eig�at lots. with 14,-,1 _... � . ., , _ ... aa� oval• i'e . a.areanein,ter � g be consa ®tre€�t wi.tt�ot�zoni.n di.str3,�ic�de si do t<;he� let a�� 'eh all . ees than 25 feet of public or private road All lotai ss'h�ll have no 1 '' P fron lati.oni� shalt be ro�►ided tO �.s~ldcates that a _Miniamum of 11 lots I _ g Will sweat the basnic X01. acoe>s?sia re ireiestsas « I La recommernded that lots 18,' 190 20, 21, 21, and M8 bar riltrariented to have th e, front lot 1Lne® along seat wettst st reet. stAtt CO ,TlOT: jerky Offer, Planning Division, (630 - 4i a l) • HEARINGS OFFICER SDR 9 1 -0012 toSE .SOWS • 2 m Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement pl oina and profile � for peel mi ary 're4ew to the construction drawings shall 1�® submitted Engineering. Depa. sent. Seven (7) Sets of , approved drawings and one (1) itemized conetr°getion cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted• for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheste relevant tt d Public improvements. . erosion, Control plan shall be provided as Part of th e public improvement drm/Pinge a. The plan shall conform to IrRSi an Control.plane. technical Guidance Handboo]z, November 1989." b The applicant shall 'demonstrate that storm drainage xnoff. , can an bbe r discharged into the existing raiR1ageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. 5 Sanitary sewer and storm drainage ' details shrill be provided asn part of the blic im r ®vemc�nt plans. area shall be Provided p ss a aupplenaent ta►, y p p calculations and a to g,ra hic map of tho ge basin service are P storm drainage P the ub�.�.o im rAVement 'plans. Lion and cap acit of alculation:A shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The loca. P y existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. A grading plan shall be sUbmitted showing the existing and proposed contours and .typicail finished floor elevations on each lot, including elevations at 4 different p:•. plan top o ,! _ as sh ®� ran the � of lc 1 r ©v lay,. tied the to of curb ea,evations a the pub P ement Plans. 7 The local, internal street that stUba to the north and is shown en the Preliminary plat to be adjacent to proposed lots 18 and 19 ; Shall �i�ni.rdar l.at with _. . P the required to be improved wi..h standard half .-street im rovements with t .. Width be 24 feet. p e�cce ti®za that the pavement wi.cxth ekna�o, The a l .., appointment Department after � pravalmo�ti�agt pP g Engineering t.C1��, ao tho with th® City shall Tigard En ixa 3.nt� ntp£mr a re�con® P plans but prior to starting any work on site. The applicant, applicant's engineer,. and contractor shall attend this, meetin g b efore receiving approved plana/perimits 9 A minimum 30 foot wide access tract, with 24 feet of pavement, curbs, and a Sidewalk on one side, shall be provided for the purpose of serving lots 6thrrough 10, and possibly either lot 6 or 11. The grivote drive standards. A five foot wide . hall provide access to all sidewalk shall P sill lotd that receive aeceSs shall be constructed to Cit. l.oca�. street from this drive parking in a Manner that will �n�;intaina a minimum shall be Signed for nap g i0. inimum twenty foot wide fire lane through the east -west .. .... A sign shall be provided et notin that the Street. portion of the street. of north-south spine street 3 noting Y s this dn. °ive with n�ort; �,,,.ta.a�?�ng red nei�ri.3:t '� of a private street and, n the maintenance and the it of Tigard. AR/ GS OFFICES. 6DRR 91 -0O 2 <- PiCsE MEADOWS h_ 11 �► jaint use and maintenance agtdement shall_ be reacrded for eves lot aanahl either, If a ;paved tahr�:'�.:ag , 4 comao+s private drivaa.� Co+�►toan accaaraewae�ye r� , g d,� prior to the issuance) of building ��eaura�n elsha�ll he �r�iv 'served ,��r or el ®O a aattefactor.y monetary perfor°man► 22. 4 maintenance and acces i agreean3ft small be execut and recorded on City standard forme for all _storm drain outfallss. 'Ate agrenent a %1X be refereanaed on and become part Of all .applicable oeede. The g pp by g o a reeame�t hash be a rov ®ci b the �ng;i'sieer, �.n � �epa�rtmuent prior '� recording. 1 M o A egrets site drainage t6 public stormwatcr drainage age eyptOM shall be provided. Private atom drains and drainag' ea sreitB Shall he provided along the rear lot line© of propoa+ed 'lea : , 3, '110 and nd Easwdents shall be provided 'where a private store drain line crosias a other lote.: A joint maintenance agreetent shall be recorded with each lot acceeef ng a common private storm drain line., o STAFF CONTAt ' : grad Roast, Building Dini aion � 639.4171) 14, Prior to issuance .of building permits, a report from a .registered eBnugilldneearar g shall be Submitted. The re por_ ; Shall indic ate tie le dbnutli;oldn ion f any fill placed building sites, suitabi �ity Of the seal fo R conatructi n, and soil bearin0 capayity. STAY'"? CON Brad Roast, i Divisions ( 639.4171) A sew =r permit Shall be prior rior to the ;:ounectiof of the exi *ting 1 . houses to the Sanitary sewer. STAFF C; NTACT: Brad Roast, Buildiang Division (639- 4171) 16. Private storm drainer shall be , rovided a�a f ,err proposed lots 1, 2, 16, 20-28, or as satiafa� p g lotting story tic the Building isain if :changes an '`''o�.lat s in Di v p provided has been ahoWa on the pres p patterns are +�adye f,r�ua what . Zaseitt,�:ntt shall be pr ~here crosa►ei.ng other toted A joint ad er ® g with each ,iot mcce g and maintenance agreement Shall or as aaaod3.f � ea) �>sha�ll have tl k�e reicor 4 r e w private storm drain. tots 1, 2, 10, �f1 26 { an eq' al right to use and an obligation to operate and. Maintain the private drainage facilities3 within the p . p .Wage STAFF CONTACT: Bead Boast, Building Diviaied (639- eaa�eai>rae�at,e a:a Shown. STAFF 41714,. . have ... pe ;' . 1 x the The gini:ch grade of the Iota ekaall hdvc� a aa�a�zc�uam >slo' � 2 Q � a l7 s �'%isg� will engineer shall certify the Stability of the Steeper al.o� , . include the alo � and fill from the excavation for the foundations of the STAFF CONTACT o, Brad Roast; Building Division (639- 4171) . stru�ures outing the' location 18. ut g A plan Shall be ;omitted to ilitealfor the e�isatin h huildiacng dCf they new ro e t " cro>ns over er around private of alb un r .g p p y iiana�e, they >nhan be prowided With ea�.e¢►letataa Rain drains Shall discharge tit an approved syitte *s STAFF c( trade t Bknd Roast, Building Di iSiOn (639 - 4171) F,IIlARiNGS OFFICER SDI? 91 -0012 - ROSE MEADOWS 17 ' 1. a, .m tir The exact location of the n4ergraound f *el dank err. i lot. 1500 tbia11 rad The tank a =•Certain8'd' iio r to t)1 ie�tnanCt �l q 9, !aFgrt t• ek all " rimed ? .f Its location woa o ^at • prc rttr ,.Li'na► upon ' 'the. ; an i taay' res i COnditiane 1 'upon ores of the p,�:at. If �o Aa n rite f�' y. ,y..'. t 1p' t "I or �;herw��.ue. clearly marked. t enact ° 1oo<at�on I�o�i %�' 'S1% �� at�1y, Staked � as sie gradling or other construction Via® tux wit in 2S ' lfe2v4 of tokc tstc. The 14)Cat.o n of the tank 'Shall .clea; ly 'arked throo AOut, ' conatrUction activitiea 0ithin 25," . fe w of the tank* C ,NTACT Jerry Offer, Plan ng' .Division; (639— lia:�� • 204 Any. tree 'rei0OVal or grading on %ie property moat be approved by the .P $nnitaq Di Vision "through a<pprbwai ' Of a tree removal, permit and approval '' of the grading plan. detailed tree inventory noting location, aaliner.L and species of l all treed with a diameter Of 6', inches Or Optater Shall i aut tted to the Planning Department. T lie inVe tory, shall no :e ail treteaa that are Propo sed For removal. Trees toter six inches in, diameter shall be r red only 2.13 nece a . to ®nstruOt streets, e,and :ee .dencee. The planning ..VidiOn May re ire that ti ad s pp lioan It)rovide for an arboriat to review, the plant for' grading and t € pr`s for trees to he, srOfttined on the site. AI' copy Of the • LL r the planning Division may prescr otesrt�,on. Tkne' �rborit�t " o p� mta�ct�.ve measured f ©r t ; ee removal permit and approved, ed gracing plan. shall be available one aito k , p�irov ' during all tree ; emoVal 'a and, grading activities. STAPP CC T Ts J'eiry Offer, Planning Divin on (630-4111). SiBDIS l ^N ° PPRO #AL SEALL BE VALID ONLY %if TEE F'IMAL 14tA° IS NECORDED WIITIIIN EIGHTEEN N vE DATE OP THIS DECISION. HOTS: OTHER RECOMW NDED CONDITIONS OP a PRO Y ISRil RAISED OF GIE O.N COUNTY' s R' 'XEtrW OF THE PRO�POSAtr O L' �Y �;' SFONSE TO commas THE PUBLit HEARING ON TEL7' S HAT9T • ly HtARINGS OPFICER sEirt 91 -0012 got MEI OW 4 -^ �, �. .. ,. , , , .n. ..1 } c �� ..r �., ...,�s . ...,a r ' ha �. •. , ..,:� t a�. �.�tin y. i�� i!�u', d �. �.�.,�_. �:�� J 1 4 •� I{.r/ 1 I e R ` HARE XS - MC$c►NAGLE ASS ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS 12555 S W WALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR. 97223 Jerry Enclosed is a copy of the pre21m� �,;narY plat for Rose Meadows with soar lots marked. Lots 1. thu 12, ex eeptin.g lots 8 & 9, are an area with an East-West slope exceeding 10% per sections 18S#3 .040 EtL. (i). While the slope of lots 8 9 does not ear these lots ... that meets the solar access ordinance would ` manner t,r in , a manns result �.n tba loss of a lot, and a decrease in density. This atea is � l fir tees. ��a the ��c�L�� also shadowed by a large stand of 100 '4- tall. s R. ��, ,. the winter �e�. and southeast` Which Would block out direct ,; unl i gat in th hours. Lots 18 thru 28 are faced in an East-West direction due to the the nsed�far�aallo�`a� North-South apprged road alignment to the north, and due to S.W. Fern and S.W. Walnut an connecting road between he site dimensions and other existing wads, restrictions imposed by t and should be exempted under section 18.8 .04 0 E e 1:'. b., The r ma nime lots are faced n on< W�.tl a . a . H ®rth- So�.gth damens a�. on, ®!� mor e th 9�D f i� et r thus meet. '.i _ J the bas i e • ,solar t0gO cement uOdo sect oar S.W. HART ST. HARR1 S MCt ONAOF..E 4SSC d INC. ENGINEERS SURV'%!ORS 11'555 ,.W. NALIL' BLVD. TI ARD, OR 97223 r Jerry: Enclosed ii a copy of the preliminary plat for Rose head ►ws with aced,: 12, excepting i dots 8 & 9, are in an solar lots �� Lots �. thru area with an 1,past -West slope exceedir 10% Per section 18.80.040 N d (i) While 4 the slope of l ot g & 9 does not eAdeed 1. r orienting manner that meet; the solar ;�►ccress ordinad`ace would , these lots _ in � ir�a lot, . .._ . area i r� @S'�.i'iA t in the loss �; a and a decrease in density. �'hi• also shadowed by a large stand o 1t�0' + tall tip tress to the south of a of and southeast which would block out direct sunlight in the winters A.M. hours. Lots 18 thru 20 are faced in a n Esat - due to the Wean direc tide,`► approved road alignment to the north, ., the need for a North -south connecting road between m Walnut and due to S W Fern and : S.W. S O 9• 4 restrictions impo sed by the site dimensions and oth; existing roads, and should be exempted under section 16:00.0 40 E :1 b f The remaining lots are faced in a North- South direction With a +. : s v Mortl�-S�snth dimension of �incre than 90 feet, h'ac� meeting the basil solar requirement under section 18 a r8 a 040 C.1. sincerely, 9 Tim Murphy Engineering Technician 131;25 . ; HALL E P.O. BOX 23397. T!GARD OR 97223 (50,3) 639-4171 4171 REPLY.. PLEASE F' L TURN ORIGINAL COPY ;','„1:125 .. 7223 tCst~,t" C mm;i. s!s;i. c i"t iliatlll i Mi'" x n ` `..RA".�'. p'. -1-71,3;s4),-$,`,14),$. I }µ' � !, '? ii:'.':i�.Fyr ,t }oc,d.L,, $sj.i., t.rr.i. t.:. 3]i.?r,,ii.Wt''wi+Of? n 4 0 a.rtw ±. nv- ;':a,.1cj ' h1 de�.�O1 •oiler o� 6 0 i�IE tdcWt::a ih ;~:tip to oui ' C °3 n ' t~ ;I. I ;k ; .�., :`� � d i.� � �, �� a.. � �. � ri � �' i� � �'t_ i � r� � n !`� �.,� � �.t to ;x., �..3 t.. I *i r0sp �n..d d+Ji :h'i ot. r ` t mthc�nts> •t� ' hat '' nw ctt� d w�sNtiii,, to b that wt' tJ ±�i a rE�s pond the n�� P1 t -w it >E 1 t: u i•tir'i d� ±. n got .'!'' , nt,j I IlErE ara hny aatr at i c ,ns 1 i • .h ' hi s • • i' ; N'}i'1 ^a "I; ± t ti l L ,l, d h'ii1V a ip =fit»± a3 mC�?� -� t. 1. n , i''' nG tw° is.ary,� . ant to n :.rec 'or'r'i Thank yr, u ,P chi'" . p i "` Cam' J yj� �} A. Bill. GrctIS 3019 SW HrsApehirre Portland, OR 972001 228-3229 August 7, 1991 Ms. Liz Newton. Connunity Relations Cal)rdaraaator City of Tigard 19125 SW Heal Tigard, OR 9722 RE3 NPO 117 MEETING; WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 7, 1991, 7 PM ROLL CALL Present-Vice Chairman Lem Cunningham gill Gross Sd Hawd*Ti (1aelammhy dihdffirot °Chairman Cal It/celery Secretary KatY Dorsett. Jim Blanchard FIECEIVED PLANNING AUG 091991 Meeting convened at 7 pay. $UE1 91X012 -PAUL MILLER OF WALNUT ST %9STH C', AND FENN 9T Members reviewed app1 +,cant' a site plan. O scUseiont Members eUpport applicant' b propOeal With the Condition that applicant yak a full street iMpro brve is t o Wei nit , green r ppi icr#nt a subdivision and 1 35th, in ordeo t� ecconaeda'e the subdivision's additional traffic demands. No Motien was made' due tb _ lack of a quorum. oado OTAIw ;TON 41XTC TELL. t CI ,11 Y OF 1 32ND pp p eitffi pawn e rpvie,�a�d e � 1 i�a�titb rti ®vts,ion� • to its r®wiraus " • 111 Ni'�0A 4:'S' a see s �iaci�ttior�. r��ffi rsiabdi� �dbdo $d ir'i OYE'�1+5 NF 0 Mo 7 NegTING A UGUst ` , i dg i J. r •t r•' RV STQpAGemcut 1 a.95.0E0 Menbero r wie+ ed a propoea l to eliminate the ON etorago reguldion4 bl . ' eliminate the RV t tore e �o�aaeion� ��ar�bera op�rQ�a arty .prop ®sa�I to e►1 regulations One ur o�S�l of the regulations is to tit t olutto�r in•order 1'� p to enhance a the appearance of residential neighborhoods. (Members support thie purpoee *e much as any vition clearance purposo Members dio+ogree with the idea that CC &R'o Are the beat recourse to deal with clutter, nu eanoe s. std. within their~-, neighborhoods. Me abe re disailree with the idea that neighborhQode with largle lots not need to limit clutter. Large iota allow oaaY 140 st oraxga 11'4 back Or tide yards Y No to lack of m. +� motion was made due quorum. FENC STANDARO9 -COC 164100.0$4. Members reviewed prxapoaal to aaa end t ae f en a stands aka ray t�la bona Di ueeion f1®rnbar4e oppose any proposal to ,amend rho 1"er� a +r;tanda rdt o�scegt �f�� p,y� 19 To irrdlude hard jas within CF'C •1g. �'i7YwI 9 z i To eUminato C t. 1 g1 . CEQ J3.00 • Iiemb t a�4 rcpt rae+�i suer of uCDC 100a O to deal with r,nrdeh 1p � un euiil ci'ay'•,e Yaidnce� A Members obearve •that .some cities etch a0 Portland, dd he�bo fence etandcar°de in rosiderntial r oiOhborhoode Plembere •find eeyeraal purpceee for the fence and deo • II' encee a n crer tea privet protest chlldrerr a nd pets a�nd p _rov�,de e�paration frara bua� �tryee e: However, f ancoe can create att est ual la tha p� °ta ea t pol iee and doc r unity aurveil lance doors le 'i the ee►foa of oo ienuni y hinder a�sr ereo acoese hinder . o iolo arid' • pedestrian eaifetye unduly interfere with thane views ►f` r�ei hbere a ' an create an uha t asjt e' appearanc . f NO No 7 ` MEETING 4UGUsT 1 gel 3) Balance the enj oyr en a of the 'property owner With those of the e®triuni%y. q motion wee rude duo to lack of a, °qucruM. OTHER BUSINESS Members reviewed a propo al to nominate the Summer ,Croak Basin, the r re complex of streams, marshes and wet woodlands within the Cities of Tigard and Beaverton, :es a METRO GREEN F"ACID. The portion of the e � within Ti�iiru°d is within NPO ' area. 'The METRO REENSPACES proQra't protects, Preserves and promotes urban wildlife reservee OiaoutGionm Melibere a part the Garner P al ProPosal to nominate the Sinter Creek Basin as a °TRO GREENSPACE+ The Surwer Crook Basin ,. an invaluable urban wildl if e rbsource. Heron, duck and beaver, to mention a few species, t ive within the basin. The Basin would be an invaluable urben wildlife reoerve with the proper protection and promotion. on This SREENSPACE would be within the tee year floodplain and the Sreenuay Plana of th& Citiee of Tigard and OeavertOn. Members euiport the e... ecif i,d p proposal to draft a letter to METRO, from i NPO 127, o ne'oi ndt e T hd Basin ae a METRO !REENSPRCE No motion was male dues to lack of a quorum. El . w Ui WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON August 19, 1991 Jerry Offer Tim Plate Dent P.O. Box 2S397 Tigard, OR 97223 RECEIVED PLANNING AUG21 199 Ple: SUB 91-0012 / ROSE MEADOWS � 0 � Mme„ + '� �`r has reviewed this development application and sw, .1 the folio +t; g and conditions Washington Count 3r reqtrixeS a traffic analysis for developMent tequests are egpected to generate 200 or more vehicle trips.. per day. This reqUest is expected eXpected to ger ate' 267 daily trips. The 001.111ty ysis w :,1,1 revieg 'traffic safety a _ s within the s .te's impact area. "6 ~ ,'the q ty" will ford any additional i, t, red ribtiaa analysis is cl.ete, 1 . the City. This review amid be completed Within three wed. for A. IO .'I2 is ANc Q.. A BUILDING pERivirr 1 • Sign a waiver not to remonstrate against the formatioh of a local iritorovement district or other 1 m tit): e, and maintain � Walnut Street ketWeen he site and SW 135th Avenue. • Sim a waiver not to v nstrate � a annst x1,11 formation of a improvement district or other ism to imptrove Sig Street be tweera its western tertims and SW 135th Avg 0e 6 The documents needed to complete c ortcl tions .. A. 1 and 2 e t i be p� �; the Washington n �oanty Sixvey �ivisaon and recorded thei Washington mi ty Redords Deparbhant. 3. Sulatit Plans, obtain Engineering Division approval acid c airn a fadili y permit for construc tion of t h e fallowing p i C to sided to standard along Svc Fe . a Stream frontage a 4 Mar ,rth romlwaY drainage a along all STAI Fern street f' ., gei. vide SW Walnut 5t t babreth the Fite and SW 135th NvenUe with a 22 Foot laved width and a wearing s, ace and life expectancy of not 1 s than fives`ea L department Of Land U acid Ttarisportticn, Lind DeVeldpm €irtt` SerVie Dlulntnrw, X35 i55 INotti i=iret Av nue H Istbo ii ra, OraVior~ 971g4 ; 03%548.1761 163 =412 ride SW Fern Sit 'b tureen the site's Ilvet. der.° l a SW 1 � �'�?44C5ue with a 22 foot . width ' and a surf d life i,, ;)i' � �Y' .c+ fivt traffic isitirmatttents required al0 a rat .,o ' t,1 r s traffic analYsis. . halm any gtxtions n please contact amp at 64 sul. • •k • OM UEST FOR COMENTN S DA'PE; ;� Jul.y► : 30, d 991 l ROM: Tigard Planning Department ' s ill0Tta ell Sib 9 1 -oo 2 m. �1 NP,0 73m &x #7) site request st for Subdivision approval td divide an appro► , n y . p angina between approximately' 5,006 and 12,630 square feet each. Z0NM: R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre) LOCATION 13135 "SW' We/nut Street . and 1472 SW Fern Street (WCTM 251 4BD, tar, lot 400 & 2S1 40, tam. lot 1500) Attached is the Site Plan and appli t' a statement for your review. Fran information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other po. • recosanendation will be prepared a decision and rdb8t �,�►� ' available will k��e rendered on �firhe proposal in the near future. If You wish comment to s space this application, we need ur comments by A,trv, 9., 1991. You stay use p e provided below or attach a separate letter to eztatrn your. ao ante. ;Lipp_ ._...�your comments your v,��rt� , in write ®t < ££ eoretaiet below with _ . y =' soon as x£ ou �kiY:e» r na e�le toreempA b t�1► above date leas hone t a :toted � this � , porn iblee If you have any questions regarding tt.,is itdatterc.:contact the Tigard ti'�as planning Department, P Nox 23397, 13125 SW Nall; u1vd , Tigard, Mt X97223. PHONE: 639..4171a STAFF CONTACT: ,,. J®r ► ®f f er PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT ,APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal 014 have Tao kaaleciiontit to Please contact of Our of hike.. mowevromoom MINOMININTIVIMIAM Please • refer to the (enclosed letter. .. Written Comments: it. alArtl�wMf,11� �'1wM1iM1a11.Y04) Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number bl" ,npY k:romm ;....v.,.i I/I,i,4'A7M• IMVfi • 1 {NMJiN111.4.6Ml Y.41 , ... • ... : sr ��s+ rr�++ .si,>tnrvlxapwneciii�l++Jl.�.w� . €0 b : provide, S.W. as a i�ttir�imumrx�.�.tch half-Street the fade ghat ement �.� along W Fern Sty to 5 meets local street standards. � . ends at the east end of the �� W Walnut street - ly dead en S . set c�xrren� A .. - The applicant menptos�nTh�reforend the proposed st�reet tcz thy: we p , d of the dev , ._. its .. , ,. applicant should extend, S.W. alnut from its current terminus �t ertd S . too the west end of the proposed develop= en : and b'ti1d it to local street standards ENGINEERING MILLER INEER�C3�TC ��NNiENT� : SUB 9 �. -1 � I�! . l R MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON evelopm .nt 1991 Jerry Offer, � Review ' Planner August 14, 19g FROM: Chris Davies, Development Review Engin eer RE o SUB 91-0012 - MILLER e c tlono The applicant proposes to develop 28 lots on a 4.97 acre site Finding r 1. Streets Access to the site is provided from 5.W. Walnut St. and S.W. i Fern St.: both of which are a ccessed from S.W.'135th Ave. un .. . °. ' o ty jurisdiction ro osed develo ment S TnT Fern St �a currently under Washington � where it is under except. adjacent to proposed i � isda.ction. i B.W. Fern St'. currently has 50 City ��f Tr.dard fur . 2.+ feet of pavement and feet of Right-of-way, approximately i ditch t,", on both sides of the road for drainage The applicant u,',;.,posed to install half street improvements along the has p' city : �_ t r . tka .n s that this road i e of Tigards local street frontage of the site that meeart �t t recognizes standards. The Enc ineera.r�_, Dip � is under two different jurisdictions, but is also under the y. : i future , "" � . will be opinion th��t . some time in the futi:trer th�� entire road w�+ the the respon bi1ity of the City of .Guard. Therefore, applicant, should be recgirired to ` profile of S . IfY S.W. Fern Alt . which shoals the a . provide a existing centerline and provide a proposed grade Whig Meets City's standards for local streets, and s As part of this development we required the applicant to Show ai extenSion of the road system to the north, this was required because a preliminary plat approval (See SUB 90 -04) showed a street extension to the south. The street actually splits the west property line of this development and thejoiring property to the west. The applicant has complied with this requ irement and has shown a street extension to the north which matches with the approved plat for SUB 90-04. In addition, the applicant has shown half-street improvements for this street extension. It should be noted that if the development to the north is built, the city would have a situation where there is a full width street adjoining with a half- street; which is a unsafe condition. Therefore, the applicant should be required to install half- street improvements to local street standards . i the pavement be a with Lhe foll.�w�.ng exception, the avement width minimum of 24 feet. . Sanitary Sewer There is an existing sanitary sewer line, 8 inch, located in S,W. 135th Ave. The existing line has sufficient c.apacity to handle this development. . Storm Drainage The applicant licant is proposing to direct the storm drainage to the northeast of this development into an existing natural drainage system,. Therefor- applicant demonstrate � � the appla�r��t sYiould be required to that the proposed system does' not significantly impact downstream properties. Recommend.at ions ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT WITH WA.SH7,N rTONr 'COUNTY. � . hallvhesu�;�'�-�ed for plans and profile 1. Two (2) sets of detail Construction drawings ' the Construction .. shall � Seven ' (7) J y review to the Engineering Departme. 9S pp . a psetsP of a xroved. prepared a Professional Engineer, shall estimate; all drawings and one (1) itemized constructio . r- i g l be r'rubmi t t ed for final and approval (NO�rE: these plans i ate in addition to any review drawin s required b the. r , . ... ;- - the � Building �;�� a.vs�'�on and should t ._ i only nclude sheets relevant. to public �m�; rovertents . • An erosior1 control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement .. dra in s . Thp plan Shall conform to Erosion Control Plans T echnical Ouidance Hanoak, November 1989," The s l shall applicant demonstrate i �' tg'atE' . t at storm drainage runoff can be discharged into 0� � e xisting drainageways without ENGINEERING COMENTS e SZJ�� 9 �. ;,L 2 -' � , MILLEFZ a. 4 significantly impacting properti4.8 downstream. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans, Calculations and a topographic,: map of the stom drainage baa,in`service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public c ti +nr►rovement plans. Calculations shall be ` asecd on full development of the serviceable area. The a ocation and c `aoacity of existing, proposed', and future line:, shall be addressed . A grading plan shal;L be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours and nd typa cal finished floo ;:` elevations on ea h lot including elevations different corners of th e floor plan tied to the top of curb elevations as shown on the public ink "ti ovement plans. Tba local internal stre0t, that stubs to the north and is ad a accent to proposed lots 18 and 19 shall be .required to install half- street improvements with the eyeption that the pavement with shall be 24 feet. APPLICANT EL SHOULD C DE THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LISTS. OF ADDITION CC�� T`i i"3E�I � FM�.N�� BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS 1 SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement A. Before City approval is certified on before approved construction plans City, the Subdivider shall: ▪ St the final plat, and are issued by the • Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be Completed; and Include in the agreement provisions _.. work is not completed leted within the eric that specified, p p complete the work and recover work the full. cost and expenses from tDe subdivider. The a agr. i h � agreement shall . � p � p J � fees and ti � ulat;e m rove�rnent deposits as may. be required to be raid and may also provide for the constriction of . the ianprovementsiti. stages and for the extension of tI e under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. ;-'t0 r 1€ .160.180 Bond file requs red by Sect i n i . As ��► � .1 � � v �.'� 0 the s�tbdi�rid.cf� �.�bad file with the agreement an assurance of per ibr .an.c supported by one of the following:' ENGINEERING COMMENT ,' :g 91 -12 NILbti t ". R • An irrev°oc ble letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact bvfAiness in the state of Oregon; • A surety bondaeouted by a i surety company authorized to v,;,.�.;r}n,.taot busines,;y n the state of Oregon which ran t ?.ls in force until the surety ,. . ,� �,,,m by the City in i ,3g that it company is nota�f:��, writ array be terminatd; or 3. Cas2 n . The subdivider shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, cg,rtif ied by a registered civil engineer, to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance. C. The subdivider shall not cause termination of nor allow e)cPiratic n . . � % without having first secured written authorization from the City, , • SECTION /8.160.190 Filing and Recordino A Within 60 days of the City review and approval, the applicant shall submit the final plat to the County for signatures of County -of officials p "' � als as required by ORS Chapter 92. Upon final recording with the County, the applicant shall : the recorded final Submit ` to the City a mylar copy of plats 18.162.080 Final Plat Application Submission* . : SECTION x.8.16 Requirements Three partition plat prepared by a land y surve or oI or engineer licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. • The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn ... pe min�:mum. standards set forth by the Oregon Revised to th Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. J. SECTION 18.162,110 Centerline Montlmentaltion: Monlaent IBox Requirements A. CQr ter ine •Monurnentatiran ; or all Ma cs Partiti�ans: ENo NFERINC CO' ENTS s 91x-12 J'i.l, Li LC�iR .. , . e c;enterl nes 'of ail street 'arid roa ,way rights of~ way sh414 be mo ;' mel.ated. as pr /ec ib d in ORS 2 , a6 ®c? ) before Chit acceptance cif street i rove gents , under the following specifications • a» Centearlineox11.041eri.t are • required to have • monument; boxes con.fortti ng to City standards set for those monument within the area anal • b. The tows a alb. monument boxes sha .1 be set to finished pavementgrade . SECTION • SgCT014 18.164 s "i °E 41Wr AND UTILITY I mP tOVE14E STAND � , 13.164 , 0 P streets 1 e No develo pme ant sha ll occur ua loos t he develpmen t has front ag ozapKrov d accos a public street . 2. Future Extensions of Streets and Reserve strips a , A reerve strip- across it he end of a dedicated street, shall be deeded to the:, y ; b. A barricade shall be constructed -s.t ,the :end of ty owners which shall the street , by the proper City not be removed until a thorised by t1c� e City Ene in.eer, the cost of wh t h shalYi be ins: luded in the Street constru.'!ctiorl 3. hp City shall' install all .street, � rela i Ve tLaffic coitro �. and stt° et riame��as spetaf iFa o the City Engineer for any develop. �Or t . the cost of signs shall be tine respoP0.b1itY of the developer • • Street: Ctoss Sections a • surface atwaterial shall be of Class C or B asphaltic $:oncrete; b • zhe final al lsft sha l l be plac ed on all new construction roadways prior to Cit r final acceptanc- of the roadway; however: not before 90 percent of the structures in the new development are completed unless three years r" have r f1rtPsed sinc initiation of c, onstruction in the development ENGINE RING CO BS d s�'3 9 .., �. MILLER • • The final lift shall be Class a Sphaltic' concrete as defined by A.P.W.A. standard specification No £i t. sra be less than 1/2 inches in thickness,. 18.164..120 Utilities All utility lines including,; but not iianiitsed tc those required for electric, communicat .Of.. lighting and cable television ,•aetv11.ces and related facilities shall be placed , unde ground, ■Ixcept for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection bo %hes and me .er cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during Constru.ntiou, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above. 18.164.13 .f'ash or Bond Required 1. All improvements installed by the subdivider shad be guaranteed as to workamanship and material for a Period of one year following acceptance by the City. ash dePos� . or Z . Such guarantee shall be secured by c f �.t o bond in the amount of the value c,-/ the yimprovemeaits as set by the City Engineer. . The Cash or bond s► y". shall comply with the terms and conditions of section 18.160,180e 18.164.150 Installation PrerequiSit /Pe fit Pee r� O No land division imbrovetvents, including ` sanitary sever streets, sidewalks, curbs, .�, storm sewers, s ree lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans therefor have been approved by the City, permit fee ,laid and permit issued, E. 18.164.180 Notice to cite Required . , Work shat" not begin ur'stil the City has been notified in advance 2. If work 18 discontinued for any rz aSon; i : shall Ao€ be resumed until the City is no 4fa.ed. ENG NE & }tiN'O COMMENTS: TT 91-12 • 18,164.200 Engineer's Certification Required ` r' s engineer shal ]. j rovde • written ▪ The land divider' ,, � provided ... the City ; that certification of a fob all i mprovernents, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, any l are of high grade, prior the City acceptance of the subdivisiOnr $ improvements or any port1.on thereof for operation and maintenance. APPROVED Randall . Wool CD: sub91 -12 .CD Cit! Engineer ENG INEERTNO CQ IENT8 : SUB 91-1 MILLER EEQUE''?T' FOR ' COMMENTS DATA: .___ .1.3 ,`30 i 10RO : 'Tigard Planning Department BE: slIBDIVISTO4 SUB 91-00.2,, inuagg (uPct #3 & #7) A request for SubUivision approval to divide an approximately 4.97 acre site into 28 peircela ranging between n approximately 5,000 and 12,630 square feet each. ZONE: R-7 (R;eeidentSal, 7 unite /acre) LOCATION: 13735 SW Walnut Street and 13725 SW[ ?ern Street (WG°i',` 251 4BD, tax lot 400 & 251 48D, tax lot, 1500) Attached 13 the site Plan n and a �; icnt c statemmnt feer your review. Prom by ` information supplied barious p departments and agenciees and frc a other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared . p opoeal in the near future. 'If you wish to cogent on this application, we needy by 991 Icou May and a decieio�n will be rendered on' the � rc ate letter to r�� ]� • y tae the space provided below or attach a� a ®pair cements u �tusrn youa". ca nenta. Golenm.Fl Lt s.1);,11 __.unable to re ©yh o d by the above date. please phone the Staff contact noted blow With your °cements and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this Matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Mall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE 639 -4171. ST NTACT* offer PLEASE CHECK THE poLLOW NG ITEMS THAT j p.PLY s We have reviewed the proposal aYeD1 have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please re fer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments Name of Per ®ors commenti Phone Number: ,.......,.. bk r% /SUU91 -12 Ei 4 .....00000woom.:00foromun. on ... .owiinwiii+r a, eV /A-L4., FROM: Tigard Planning Department R: $U UTSI S Q01 I ISLE R (two *3 & f7) A request for Subdivi 1on approval divide an approximately 4 97 acre ° parcels ranging e elate i.r�±�® �8 b nl p ximately. 5 000 and 2, 630 square feet each �" NS: ,R -7 between a ro (Residential, 7 units /acre) LOCATION: 13735 SW Walnut Street ' t d 13725 SW Fern. Street (WCTM 231 41 D, tax lot 400 & 231 4BD, tan lot 15C V) Attached is the Site applicant's for From information eu lied b Y Variou departments statement and o n other r information available to our staff, a report and re commendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on thm proposal in the near future. If you wish to ottmment on this application, we need your comments by u . 1, 199. You may x the space provided ed below or y a tttach ,,. a separate letter to return your; c nt S e you arej able ree d above date pleaue phone the contac t noted below with comments and con ira your co�ent® in wi� ae soon at possible. If you have any queatiene regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , 7n'i9Ia"d a OR 97223. PHONE: 639- 4171. STAF}! CONTACT: Jerr . Offer PLEASM CK FOLLOWING 1THS. T sLX w. We have reviewed the py:`capa►esl, and have Ito Objections to it. our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Peraon commenting v REQUSST FOR COMME>C t DATE: July 30 1991 ;;;_,. Tigard Planning Department 11% Q_NNJH 91 -0012 1t� "L R (NPO : #3 ' & 97) A reguedit fair SuladiMi,lsian ,1pprOual to divide an approximately 4.97 acre site into 28 parcels ranging ,between approximately 5,000 and 12, 630 square feet each. Z E: A -7 (Residential, 7 unite /acre) LOCATION: 13735 SW Walnut Street and 13725 ( 4660 & 2s1 413D, tax lot 00) SW �'eexxa Street 19�ki �T;�1 AND, tia,rs lot t 15 Attached is the Plan applicant's at�ent for your revieW. From information supplied $ various departments and �a and from other information available to our otaff, a report t atio � l k e prepared and a decision sill by. rendered on the F rc ae, in the lQ you w1n1e to comment on this application, we need your comment® by awp,, 2, 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your. comntaw If eau _ are . u able to me• • d b , the above data please phone the staff a osita t noted belotty with your comments and confirm your tommenta in °writing as et,,vn k►a possible?. If you have any questions regarding this maters contact the Tigard Planning , F 23397, 13925 SW Hall Blvd., ' igard,� OR 97223. PE0NB Planning Department, A LPO Box STS COlfrACTa �errv_ +Offer ,, PL SE CHECK THE FOLLOWING /TEZ4S THAT APPLY: have reviewed the prow° ®al and have no objections to it Please contact Please refer to the enclosed' letter. bkm/813091-12.13KM , • pl :pis.: 1 REQUEST w rn COMMENTS YL .J L. 3 l 1991 PROM: Tigard PlannL.ng Department a SUBDIVISION : Sus �1 --0012 MILLER 7; re ... sit for S +llbdiair�i4n C �3aa.. Rite into app�rcwal to divide an approxini�rtely 8 parcels s�ang F•,ng between approximately S, 00O and 12#630 n q are .. feet each ZONE: A -7 (Residential, 7 unite/acre) ) reet and 13725 `� n cre LOCATION: 13735 SW 'i�alxrti� �•, � SW Fern Street (WCTM 251 45D, tax lot 400 & 2S1 4B1, tax lot 1500 Atta *ed is the Site Plan and applicant's ataaement for yew: review. From infix nation Supplied by • various departments and agencies and fry other the xiee fartuxe �f you prepared inf( the �o ®a.i in dation will be pre. cared and* d�3:ei.onaw3.11 bets rendered on to report ��po and reca�rr�n • to c -i--.9 „ 19!91. You may s ce provided below or a ta►ch a eeparaom7nent er A return your�;co,o enta. use the Pa p to letter te°.. the ata Contact to comment On this applicatian, ��,� xn ®e a�nr c phone h. co�ronments and confirm m your p .eaeo P 1 noted below h ®y �;md ._ l��ir. thF3__a.'t+s►�a"er delta. ecrme�1•�s in Writing as ®m�ri as entione .9 Satter, 'ct the Tigard regarding Blvd., i.�asc�ca�nts�st Vin.® �'ig�i�cd p; you have any , Planning MDepart ►ent, P® Bost 23397, 13125 SW H Tigard, 1 STAFF CONTACT: Aerry JDffer PL`[ASE CHECK THE FALLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLT: We have reviewed the proposal and have no ob jeetion$ tee it. . ._ .� please contact ,., . of our office. Please refer to the encloned letter. Written con mente are s ��x�� . I and Wa d and i t.�:r : Dxstx bC� . w�.�Z recxL'tl�G r a ; ha. -- gravity sya to ms be installed within thas proposed deVelo; men , / .. , . 'ohr P. Miller, Administrator Name o PeroOn Cowmen i...nu: Phone Number: 639-1554 bk /SU591 -12. B MED P NftG ,p 7:.. REQUEST 10!t COMMENTS DATE: �uly 30 r ..g.91 FROM: Tioa d Planning Department 5�ffi ' 1- 012 MILLER (NPO 03 �� *7) A� request for Subdivision ra y; approval as ranging PAP 5 : 041CI and 12,630 ;� each. ZONE: $ , �#,� -? acre ' site into between a roximatel o e divide an a�'Pro�sa�tnate�.g 4 g mare . feet ea et., an�t�. 1�37�5 LOCATION: 13755 SW Walnut ,Otte. bets (Residential, ,, un3�ts�'acre� 7 BED o tax lot 1500) SW Fern Street (w0 2S1 43D, tax lot 400 & 251 4 Attached is the �e Site Plan and app i csa nt ° stat en t for your review. . Pita 3ufcrmatiorsupplied ed by 3o�s de Part��uta And agencies and from other r information available to our staff, h x� � and rg rommendation Will prepared and a decl ai ®n will be rendered on the ro. ea the ,near futur e, of you cad to che on this aid attach d our comaer, x i3gl a 'tau may nee the sp ace provided below or a separate letter t return your, ��. nabie �� 1 ttA atare datee, pltea®e phone the staff contact noted below with y v comments and co nf iXfl your Comments in wu%k ii g as • soon at; ssible. If you have an y u eetiOne regarding this m atter, contac t the Tigard planning Department, P0 Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 9 7220 PHONE: 639. 4171.; STAFF CONTACT: 7,_Te; defer . PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING I 'x'EMS THAT APPLY: XXXX We have reviewed the propdaal and hav e no objections to it ]Piave ccntact of our officem please refer t<'l the enclosed letters Written Commeent e A_ 10 " SU MATH R S 'ORT S Z E o ' THIS _ P Ta 'i°HA,'[' , F Lame of Pardon doMmentingt Phone Nia0er: ■ ■ 0 :4�: SCOTT P.lE e. 9 RHQC ST FOR ' CONMENTS }; p DATE: a tBi_y 3j f :91 i .. ..... or"mgi"rrrseam. M: Tigard- Planning Department 3C'3OZVISYON Sun 91-0012 ,,i1? (NPO� #3a 7) ? r/",, eet for Subdivision approval to divide an airpswoximately 4.97 re site nta 28 parcels ranging t : tween a " rnxi mately $5,000 and 12,630 square feet each. ZONE: R-7 dt egidentia1, 7 mite /attre) LOCATION 13735 SW Wa1mUt Streatit and 13725 SW :ern Street WCTH 26'1 4HD, talc lot 400 Si 281 420, tax lot 1500 ) At4ae&end is the Site Plan �� and applicant's and agencies and from ether p statement for your revi Froet infesnaatiOn supplied ions d a .. report ..k n will b"M prepared information available to cur staff, a re rt axnd seccxae►nndat n win be rendered On the proposal in the near future. If you wigh� and a do i t .ti y by Apia n 9, 1991. You may Use theme space provided below or attach a aepaara�c t letter er be9 return ybUr,coMments. L. �y� �►re un ourre~gnts an�deccair�a please writing Goon ad noted below with seible If you have any quest ,one regarding t his Matter, contact the Tigard Planning, Departyrient, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639.4171. STAFF CONTACT: ,,..Jer-.._ Offer PLEASE CHECK TEE FOLLOWING ITEMS ' THAT APPLY We have reviewed the proposal and have no ebjeOtions to it. 1leaie contact - `.., .�. of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments If 1 t r4. it d .s Name of Person ComMer►tifg° Phone Lumber: J.... bkn /SUB9i' -1 .l!.M 31 51 ti WAS . CTON COUN'T' F DISTRICT T Oa GENE dittekILL 'Nett E' ermine# ,urea^ . �',,. fMta e. t6s Sow, 13lailtd0 Street a Aiohoi Dteggaii 07007' , FILE NOSE 91 -0012 FIL1 TITLE MILLER APPLICANT: PAUL MILLER RT.5 BOX 62 SHERWOOD, OR '' 97 140 Q °I_JK E.c. ,tZ i. TI,;, I s Applicant requests Subdivision approval to divide an approximately 4.97 acre site into 20 parcels ranging 2, 630 square e t ; oes� �.a units per acre) LOC TIO ZONE: "� R-7 r Resldlenti.a1 7 uni re ee J�3 ;'�35i s�'' 'Walnut @oBn approximately 5 , 0 0 0 � and �u Street (WC 2S1 4ED tax lot 400). and X13 / SW Ferry Street (WC 231 4HD, tax 1t 1500) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium(' Density Re riodential NPO NO: 3 and NPO CHAIRPERSON: Herman Porter i Cal Woole rY PHONE NUMBERS' 639-0895 / 639 -4297 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION gQ NT B E AA °Q,S° A" -QA 1 PLANNING COMMISSION DAVE OF HEARING: TIM.7 s 30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING t iaME . 7 �� s�o� 0 CT's COUNCIL DATE OF �. RA Q9Ew FO.M COMMENTS AND sT TRCHy ENTS : . X VICINITY mAN ��id? PLAN' .. NATIVE ARCHITEC'T'URAL PLAN BITE PLAN OTHER :' PREPARE ` FOR PLAUMER APPROVAL m ADR'INN'1' 'T"IRD "�I X , NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS ''TO BE MAILED .. .; LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE OF PLICATION NOTICE TO DLCD ATTACHE E S: ;.. , STAFF CONTACT s Jerry Offer COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES "s 2/.:161, 442,1, I01G2 201; 703.1 /.4c4. 8.1.14, 8.1u3 CODE SECTION: 1 a b S 0 � a 0� . S s 9 2,/ .114, 15, B160dy l � ,E rr x.802 . 1 64 °I'' aS • S.W. HART St HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOCIATE' ENGINEERS YORS 12655 BLVD T CI RD, O. EGO;N �I �ti70EPHONg (503) '639 -34 City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attention: Victor Vie: Rose Meadows Dear Sir» '�' Per your request, enclosed axe ten additional copies of t e Rose Meadows Preliminary Flat CITY OF TIGARD COMUNITY DCvELOOmENT DEPARTMENT PkE—APPLICATION CHECKLIST pate . APPLICANT 1416v*-t?.. a. PROPERTY LOCATION Addrest el2.14,J 511z. 6-e)c Fr ki,ie.‘r 135-446,. Tax Map/Tax Lot 1-40-rt • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION/NECESSARY APPLICATION(S) AWE. 61)1406C 7e, 51A,Iod _Lb re,tae-, 1 euiew dfigle 1.4-usir north south LA...4. v 1_,....,, . Me( StAvapitd. its.. -kotger 7......._.r.,..,., eziit L 6, Of st.k 0.1, iff e/112-...-1_LeP.......„...........MMOMO.a..../... West cOMPREitEaVE PLAN DEAN(ITON u. . ZONING DESIGNirrioN . , . NEIGH6.1.1MWO PLANNING ORGANIZATION NO. cgAPPosom At, COE)E: REQUIREMEUTS lot size/width Sciltback : front Spdcil setback: steeets establiihed aees flag lot cessorY steuctOi"e zee0 10 1PtaxiOUm tot coverage ____// haXikmuin bdildihg hikt Special heights 4flits flag 'tot, oth Density calculation , ;'&5 . ai(ooed # of unr`t Density transition Street Trees Buffer Areas ,_. - ..._..... Parking Visual clearance g loading .-- � ---�-" Parking and �! ..�..,,.............; Signs ttre., Ab: �+ t y I s'' - A - r , t<'t c. 9: OTHER CONSIDERATIONS (See application checklist for specific its °�tns� p �, deatnage" ' >Z5% slope, -7--- .-- �a�sxta.ve �,andss .Faood ��.ai� w ---- -- - .�.a.. Wetlands Open space .« Historic otierlays Cs/ c. nn e cticr x i at %fit c ki Stree t lm p e en o a ded i t iti°13 Righ4: - of --i4aY lake Salitarlt 8e1sser improvement _ 6444 Storm Bei er irnpr ovetUerlts K�- ;. '� 4 Hat( iwv4voteoteill., on n41) aai€9,044k rir %ce air �► i'h a�. " 1,04611, 6, Ste` vtd .v d s 1,4 !°' i 1040;ci pair "o ff ',ire 44.1 7mprryvemenL Dg reer�ert Permit: Bond t; Fees rrt��.17"I Othee Agency ' Obit -mitS ee i0, _ t4/� ®tom . .Y_ im E�,�71 ~ M4 Cr„ _1' ,' t ,Wereutittitw iMPROVEMEN 75 Administratita staff' reuiew Public .Near°ing /Head` ' r ring3 Officer �9A P iblic $Raving /Planning Ct rnds$ion The Administrative decasion 60 opP ru �1at ely �D 1;\ ay � after a 40-da' ap peal period .follows all deci.sions on Public Hearing she ;-Al occur'' complete r p I icat ion it file d: t� acc,e CITY OF TIGARD CpMOwXTY DEV!LOPt1 MT"' Vii` PAlii EWT APPLi0AT :CON' CHECKL,EST The items on the checklist below' are .required . /or the ,successful completion of your app1iCati,or b iss .on requirements, 1hi,s c ecUlist identifies what is regidred to be subrnitted with your app1i.i:atiorte This sheet N! UST be brought a6d submitted with all other arterials at the time you submit your application, See your apPlication for further explanation of these items or call Plannirjn at 639-4171. BASIC . MATERIALS INCLUDe o : A Application for (1 copy) " 8) Owner's signature/written authorization C), Title tr6tnsfer instrument C n*a..,,� � � n►a E) D) plot or site plant $'' Apr lit ar ' statement ° i. l i r fee (s2PA efE: f 121. ) SPEcI:IC MATERTAL8 A) Site Irvfor►rpG flion sh4 An ' (l o. of copies .r,..:.:....) 1) Vicinity Map 2) Site site & ds <<menr ions 3) Contt4ge illesro (1 ft fib 0-10% Or h ft for grade > t 9%) C 4) M_g p r .^ pond .: E, 3 A, ��•� 1'tl�t a a�ti;erns csaorse� araG ri _.. areas inclu ih C �,) . �.o�:,�L�ona of nat�r~�l ha►xar�i a a) Flood�,�1ain areas y kh) d �. opes in xcess, of 25% 1 c) Unstable a round C 3 1 Areas with hith ,seas ona l r atee table C 1 ti. o' .l erosio.. :. e s n potential � ...... �t Hreas With f? Arl.at hvang sever�1�: weak fo�nda�:aor� soils t �" 6) Location of r',TtOOrc+ areas ��s shown on the O +mpreh�,wsgVe Ma i ntor'y ioiicitAt;lingt a)9,tldlife htbitat5 6) W1tlartds dither tito features: a,') Rock Outovioppings B) Trees With 6 ° + caliper measured s out. fron.grout'.0 level 8) Locatith, of eDcistinq structurds and their' illses 9) Location and type o4 on arm off —site noise sa+ r to 1.0) Locution of okistinc ott,...7it s and easements 11) Location f e i,stir1g dedi, atdd right of ys 8) tite tieve .c omeht PlAh h (mo , :e of apes ) c 1) the Prot:sd site and tur ounding tiii"opera es a) ContoUr lifie e$tdeitov 3) the location j tli.men ioIins and {! narr4,0 of ai t!.: Ex i st i . ng B S c patted s' ti e s & other' public w and 4:.+ aS ement$; on the v ).' 0 vin 'ww o s' j o 1.rn y 1ropek ies Pagel . .A y " A f ,s 1•� b) roposed streets or r 4;her public ► ys' & easements' on the, sits, t Alternative routes s of dead end of; Pr^oOosed C1 _F11ter� �f47 c ► streets ' that require future ;ex'tension C a 4) The location and diaisension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site t 1'!'' b) Parking and circulation areas C 3' c) Loading services 'areas C a;, d) Pedestrian and bicycle ciirculatie c �oadin and �eruxc n [] e) Outdoor common areas, C J f) Above ground utilities C 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Eiiisting permanent structures, i iproveMents, utilities and easements whish are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the . site i b) Proposed structures. improvements, utilities and eAsements, on the site I 3;` 6)` Storm drainage fa±yilities and analysis of downstream conditions t 3 7) Sanitary sewer facilities C 3 8) The location tion of areas to be 'landscaped C 3 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques I 3 10) The location cr mailbostes 1 3 i•) The location of all structures and their orientation 1 3 µ r 12) Es:asting or pr"bposed sewer reimbursement agreements 3 ) The site �a. of copies ) �radinq Plat) t ;,plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the t)ite analy$il drawings And shall contain the following informatiUn 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals and time of year it is proposed done. . ` � p �+poseci to be 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiatint, Subsurface _ ,,, ration and geotechni ca l a) .�ubsurfa�Ge eacr•e�c�rt b) The 1,41tdity of sanitary sewe engiAeerin; ) :,4 and storm drainage service proposals c) That all probl ems Will be mitigate0 and how they Will be mitigated C 3' C3 C I D) The site deice .apment plan proposa►'l shall i:nciudej p the sgtar►�e ;Footage of a.l l L F`i.00r 1�ans indicati�hq strut �Aur es pr nposed for r,.�se n . i x 2 r a ical elel" 3 �yw+ t'aor1 rlrawi.ngs of each sti�a�icl:a,:�•�i�. f iE) landscape Pl ri;' (o'� of Copies ;� ,) Tire landscape ' the aracii scale of 'tvt p gat xan sP�all ��e drauln site analysis plan or a larger scale if netiessary anti shall .nd icate 1) p scri,ption cif the ir"r . atio i" syst sn �"�ere applicable ""� �) C�mcatxa►n .and, hex ht of fences b��i`ers ani sc�e, hin s. APPLICATId CF1 CK �` ST -- Page .I. r. o.: • Loca ion of terraces, decks, she l'te and common Open spaces Location, type, size and species off , existing and Y Proposed plant materials. , The ' 1andscapc- plan. shall ' include 'a narratiie which addresses'. 1) C 3 foil ��,;��rditao:�s . Erosion control measures that will be used. C £ y areas Sign drawings` sh 11 be submitted' in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of thr Code as part of Site netel+ pment Revissign. prior t4.0 obtAining a Building Permit to construct the g , t 3 G) Traffic aenratiic�n esim►te H) prelimi�►arg►artitiiain o�°_ lot__ %i..'ee adjustment rsap shOWin (No. of opaes 1) The owner of tho subject parcel 2) The owner's authorit4c agent 3) The map 'scale. (2®5th, i0m or 200100t.:21), inch north arrow and date . 4) baescription of parcel l�acatiOn and ,boundaries 5) Location, width and name of streetsa easeme Ord other public Way's withih nd adjacent to the �oarcel Location of at' per naneVit buildings on and witE\in 2 - property 3ine�. �feetcrf��,,llpr' 7) Location and width ►f ail water c,)urses 8) ) Location of any trees with 6" o;., greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level 9) All slopes greater than 252 10) Loc►tion of existing utilities 11) For major land partition which a) The proposed right -of a -i ay b) A scaled cross- section of Plus y reserve strip licable deed restrictons 12) Any applicable land �� '' 13) Evidence that l•. nd Partition will not pre+d lude efficient future land division .there appli. able Subd ig s xoh, .IT tisinar'j _ .8�', t Via �►nd data si'towi.ri (No . of Copies ►` and' itx lity" easements creates 'a public :Street location and width the proposed street 1) • kale eguai1rw. 50i l�� or 2rJ0 feet �o the it h and imit�d to one phase per sheet r . u � 2) The pr ^oposk�►d name of the subdivision 3) Vicinity map propert;;Y t s 're1ati.onvhip to arterial and collector streets 4) addresses and telephone numbers of the 'owner 6) . of tear t to civideo�' i, ecorcied 6) Boundary line 4,1 s�Ul�arVi:�aorr oi^J n � . 7) Names of adjacent a..ent r.. tnet`s of adjoining paecels of Ons..:hl x„+idd 'land CJ C3 C3 C3 C 3 C3 G 3 1.3 CI C3 d�Ueloer� er�gxhe.. desi pe'/ as app1icable(l ......... . p .ter; surireyer, g� h; Gate of �pplicati�'�e� ) contour lines related to 0 City established ,t+enh- mart at ��foot xnterrrals fcrr� J-1a 9 + ra es i, e�eatei^ • i than !,b % i 3�pIL :�GATT0N i� �,0{ LIST age: Vi 1 U1 Teet 0,41 Tree rf Photo/ (236ZP VV28P 9), The rdloso ' location' type 'and size all of t fo l..ttwirg, � � thin and ad)acent '.to the propoaeo subdz.il,ision)`: a} Pgcblic and pr i iate.. right -of a<<' .s and easeme8ts ' b) Pub is and prix to sanitary and ' ,torm .aural;" lines; j*; ' e) ;.bomestic water mains; 'intlu'ding fire hydrants Cam°' d) ma j9r power telOhoeil transmission lines (56,006 ..vol;ts . r i' eater) C " e) Watercourses [ f) geed resee^vations, for Park, open spate+ , ;pathways and, other land encumbrances 10 ) Ar rotx i. to Plar and profiles of . p: ro. posed say tita ry and stGr,Yr f teuers With ,grades and pipe sizes xzdxoa,eo 11) Plan Alf the Proposed water distribution system, Phowing ;pipe sizes and the location of u;1ueS and fire hydrants. C� 12) Approximate centerline prof].es showing the finished grade of all streets incluAireg at ns �Na oast e1t'�eCas io tv reasonable r h d th ,13) Scaled cross sections of Proposed street ^,tight -of --way C 14) The location of all areas sOtd'l ect to inundation Oe storm Water o%rer"f to u► C 3 t5) Location, xon, rw>idth and d ireoti.on of flow of all water. courses and drainage Wags Ct'""�- 16) The proposed lot conf iqurations ;, aPPr°oddmate lot d imens irons and lot numbers. We loVgs =aeo to be used for purOoses other than residential, it shall b indicated upOn Such lots 17) The r , 6 ' ches ot'� �.. he location of ail trees with ae dia�►ter greater measur•od at 4 feet abovta ge ound level, and the proposed p g y sera 1 18. The efc i st in ant�t� s, if tir�n of trek ) location of ai�.�struot��.r�acan including h� rtya �n A d, the present uses of the 'structures, and a tatei ent of which structures are to remain of per platting 19) Supplemental ntal information iricLding a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) b) Proof of property ownership r' c) A proposed 01 40 for pea ision of su dii,tzsi,ore improvements ( 3` 20) Existing natural features incl uding rook abut• -- ,,"' ..: pP 21) if an of , cr•o' In s, � wetlatids and rear sh, are' y ' f the the info�^m�tii,on aahrtiot prapta.cabl bo ,;Shouln oir the preiininar•y Plat, it , °ha11 be incur pora'':ed into a narrativa and submitted with the apPl jcatit n. Other Information C3 >,...i r:.r" . +. t i - - �wr.. i..�rr.1..w..r..r...r+r-- .:...• sw' �u. 1J - — W+wr�+4� , 4bnaw •w.n.++' �..nlx.r..vr:.w,r :e.+..owi. .,. ...++r., ... y,M.,w.....�a.......rx .. ;:, ....- . '_ •T�.r.w_wrrwwr.�Gw. APP 1CATI0 C EtKLZS -=• 'Page 4 • �. �►.' NO. � (2 co Le,3 ) ! ,� CIT•r DEPARTMENTS uL.1din inspector/Brad R^ city Recorder Engineering/Gary A. Permits Coordinator/Viola G. SPEC Dl TRIG Firs District (pick ..up box bldg.) CPO No. Tigard Water Di trictt 8777 SW ,Barn~ ham St. Tigard, OR 97223 SchoOl Diet. Na. 46 (Beavr) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 School District 23J (Tig) 13137 SW Pacific Hwy . Tigard,, OR 97223 Metzger Water D otrict 6501 SW Taylors Perry Rd Tigard, oR 97223 1.' AFFEk:'TED JuRIspxoTIONt. Wad h. C6. Land Ude S Tr,';anrtp. 150 N. Firet Ave. Millaboz o, OR 97124 .0 :tent Girt is i.n 73 tin oann Rice Scott Ring Feed Eberle �...,...._ tie Borreaon 'h. Jim Rndryx City of Beaverton 00150k 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 state Righway BiviQ ion 90 ' G ndt3rC n 00 talt, 565 34averton, OR 07075 I� tr�GE *�Ol�.osaioeh•••e000esoea �+ pp/� '. �J e 1 a•' V u S• V•• SPEC S ./' General Teieghone 12460 SW Math St Beaverton; OR 97007 Boundary ComMission 320 SW Stark RooM 530 .Portland, OR 99204 P93TRA 2000 SW last Ave: Portland, OR 97201 ..5395 DLCD (001,, 's only) 1175 Court St. Ng Salem OR 97310-0590 Other ..o•eoeeoeoore • o•.iI a•.neo..i,ar *eee. ®rt]:and Oe3noral Electric Brian Mobi'e 14655 SW Old Scholle Ferry Beaverton, OR 97007 dam _ _ Metro Area Communications Aarlan Cock Twin Oakb Tecbnol y Center 1815 NO 169th Place S -6020 Sealierton, OR 91006-4906 Yom' Natur .l gae Deana Thomas 220' NW Second Ave. Portland, on 97209 .K ... OS West Pete Weldon 421 SW Oak St Port.linc1, OR 97204 TCI cablevision of Ok'egon, Inc,' Mil ' Rallook 3S00 S'i' Bond Portland'; ci8. 91201 WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON 400 1413:33 320: 0. .,4F "Aar 144.02 1140 .5f Act ira 131:; a7o' 3100 . 4e AC. 122:52 170.02 2700 .53 AC' 433:08'` 64':53' 170- 220' ! 649° 431 ' E so. 17 INITIAL POINT ,'e9,44a0 1712.20', li Goodpaster, Randiy Woo ley, 'Dick Bewerrdorh"o Phyllis ,Harts, Egad Roast, Irene Erteil, (..aura Freeman A+ U,. i Fk0 Wheatley r C .h y Wh e DATE: July 31, 1991 (U CT0 Final Orders on Annexation 29 (Cook . � .� .... _ � , ��otti�e �lh 3%.' � � a Census Attaches{ it the final order on noxation 293 (Cook), elf May information i as follows rder-a 00s and Ruby Cagle 13635 SW Walnut Street Tigard, OR 97223 Population: 2, single family residence Evan and Betty WVhitaker 12635 SW 1 ,Ift Court 9 R Tigard, OR `r4 23 Pop ulatlhina 2; single le farnily residence Peter and Elaine tiohmidt 12660 SW 136th Court Tigard e family residence abard 014 97223 Population: 2 ��n�li ... , PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 320 S. W. 'Stark t #530 - Portland nd, Or''gon 97204 Tel: 229 -5307 FINAL ORDER FEE: BOUNDARY CHAWOE PROPOSAL NO. 2930 - Annexation of territory to the City of Tigard. Proceedings on Proposal No. 2930 commenced upon receipt by the D y resolution from the City on March 28, 19'91 ,�ou�adar � Commission of a r� :so1 requesting .. that certain property annexed to the city. The re► o luion. mets the requirements for initiating a rc )osal set forth in ORE 199.490, particularly paragraph (a) of section (1). Upon receipt of the petition the Boundary Commission published and posted notice of the public hearing�inroacc� ldanceawitha 'ORS 199.463 91 "� public; hearings study to be made �*� this Proposal Deal �hica end conducted ,Es ® the P P rn � May 30, The Commission also caused a s y P p which . 4 , othgical trends and pro- jections e�,anom� ►, demographic and s�oci jections and physical development of the lend The Commission s.. cr r e v iewed th,14s proposal in light the following statutoryguidance o Policy. "199.410 � ym (1 ) The Legislative Assembly find that: (a) A fragmented approach has developed' to public services provided b y local government. Fr mentation results in du lica p tiAYs in services lneQual tax .bases and 3; ezistat'lde' to coopera- tion of Such an • planning c�p�.e�nc�ntati.�n. is � a barrier to approach roach has limited the rderly dOvelopment and growth of pp g detriment of thl.' Oregon's c�iy a urban areas to th of the citizens state. (b) The programs and growth of each unit of local . govern- ment affect not only p so the activ- ities only that a�ticu��ar unit � but ��l p y units within each urban .arn�3 Programs of a variety of other area. As ': local progra�s` bece�si�. li.t to inure o�derl (�,, se .ncreasin l inner govern,merntal the state has a �re pon . ,, s tment o.c local. ,government baurndari.es tt detra�nati ®n and ad�tis best meet ` tae needs ` of tf e; people a (d) focal c ehehsive +�l • a�ns def'i'ne loo l lane uses • .but• y not specify rhich units of.. local goverkuneht are to provide public' services then i k asd, 'se v ces are refit fired: . it Final Order = Page r no_a. , 4S • ztr (e) Urban population densities and ijtene ,rye, development. require' .a broad spectrum and high level of community services and control s.. When areas become Urbanized and require the full range of , community '' services, priorities are .required reg :, °; rd .i g the type and levels of services that tae rest dents neod and desire.. Community , service priorities need, to be established by weighing the Iota] :service needs against, the tptal financial' resources available for ,i 'securing services. Those ,' service priorities are required to r�:fl:ect , local circumstances, condo. tions and limited financial resources. A ei gle governmet tal' agency, rather than 'several governmental agencies is in most cases better able to assess the Zinancial' resources and there- fore is the best mechanism for establ ishin g ,community servi ce Priorities. lative Assembly that each (2) It is the intent o�� the Leg�u�;, 3►'. boundary commission sion establish policies and exercise its powers under this chapter in order to create a governmental structure that Promotes efficiency and economy in providing the widest range r that encourages and Pro range of necessary services �in a rgar�ne vides planned, 141'011-ordered and efficient :development pa terns. (3) The purposes of ORS 1990 410 to 199.519 are to A (a) provide a method or guiding the orea,tion and geowbh of cites an spac,al service l srfct s in Oregon .in order to prey t illogical extensions of 4o g�. -- eft en vent gal government boundaries encourage the reorganization of overlapping governmental g cies e adequate a ua�l+ity and qa j nt :ty of (b) Ass ubli a `ser ices . ir and the 'inanci:al i �,�tegrIt o each unwt cf _local goner invent; -(c) Provide ah Impartia1 forum.. for the res "lut :on of ocaa government Jurisd.ictiona l uestions a oundary dete minatid y .. _ (r�� F'rovl.�le that b , ns are c,�onsiste psi tag �l. al comprehensiv plans and are `..fry coni raa . os . t witch idle planning goals. In mal ing `hou.n dary deters ina .o►ns Mate w - the com . �:orrsi . ei*_ . l g mission shall first � fob �Q�nl ®�rw�henethe a��riow� sine , lan for consistency of its a t dged. loca, l comprehensive plan provides y reotIon shall. the oommission ons der the ; tats �s do goal.sa Che co im .ssion. sal : cons :de'r the , m .nb, phasing and .. .. _ dar;� determination any y g availabili,t . of se��i�es �► �a�i�. a bcaun , Fine 1 Order - Page e) Reduce the fragmented, approaoh, to' sery ice delivery b . enCOura in g sin g le a g enc y se rvice delivery Over service delivery b several agencies. 199.462 Standards for revio i 'of hyhan . ea; 'territory which may not be ihclu ed in certain changes. (1) In order to curry but the purposes described by ORS 199.410 when reviewing a peti- tion for a 'boundary change or application under ORS 199.454, a ibOundarY commission shall consider local compreherisive planning for the area, economic, demographic aphic btnd sociological trends and prc n:ctiona pertinent to the proposal, past and prospective PhYscal development of land that would directly or indirectly be affected by the proposed boundary' changed or application under OCAS 199.464 and the goals e lopted under ORS 19/.225." (2) Subject to any pk Ovision to the contrary in the prix ci pal Act Of the affected district or city and subJecv to the pro - cess of transfer off' territory. ta) Territory within a city may got be included; within or anneled t ► a district without the consent o city council; (b) Territory within a city I� a y not be included within or annexed to another city; and (c) Territory within a district may not be, included within ar annexed to anther district subject to the same ,,principal Ac t,e d93 O5 OOO t _ T„ hey�6�n�' �` �'. s/$ �Jio�, �ir�y ►�iso�r ♦{/cgo�na��y.�legre�dh�Q lets pal c,�+�s adoptted ®) tc r3�ca . trend * of boundary o mni ss .on operations nd decis, .o is, and pas' direct and it d re t instr ctio s of the bate g slat tre its airy .v n at its decision (See 'indirigs it Sachibjt "A" ett ohe'd h re to) REASONS FOR V CXSIO (See Reasons for Benison "A1e attached hereto F ina l Orr �►r Fage ... .... �.�_.. i,w..,,. ..,.ra.ry .-w.i . u r. r �i .....x d.., .. �i •.•�.. �..x .•� �,....x. .....n. •.. u .:.I ,n.i dint ,e basis of ; Findirngs and Reasons ; Fo ecision listed in Exhibit "A" s the iiounadary Commissiejn appeeved Boundary Change Proposal No. 2930 as modified on May � O, . 1991. NOW TI ERF 'OR ; ORDERED THAT 'c;he tervitory der:^ribed in Exhibit "13, and depicted on the attached tapt . be anne)sed.'. to the ,� 45 days from this date �� ' 14.0 City � Tigard as o� to which is vt�l 1991 s b jest to the provisions of ORS 199, 50a arid 10� 519 PORTLAND METRC1POLTTAN AREA LOCAL GOVEFINMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION e •q, 4A Exhibit Proposal 2930 FINDINGS • The territory to be annexed contains 4.97 acres, 2 single- family residences, an estimated population of 3 and is evalu rated at $184.470. • The property owner has petitioned to obtain servirea to fti oi1itate development- ndary Commission the The Bou� ��as three 'adopteri polici.ea ` First of these olicies states that the Commission generally sees cities as the primary provider of urban services. g s may cause financial prob- lems ' that: rowth of cities lems for districtso the second policy stipulates eb.�emhat the Commission will h�.1p find solutions to the p The . - the p p states that he Oo ®mission may a� ro ve irregular third policy boundaries in the short term if these lead to logical Service arrangements in the long term. Petitions were received from several property y lots owners of 1 in Ob lei hts east of the subject territory. A couple of rs these °.e. that caused the Commis- sion iquesti,on� whether ' they them wer truly exprese ons of 4hese i inoe annex or merely statements of interest in obtaining e �r 3ini�ent to �► merely seuvr services. Therefore, the Commission continued the he av ntz +.tiid itself sent notice to each property owner in Obrs Hem. In response to the Commission's le' ter nine of ... . �..... owners responded that they were opposed to anne�tatic?n owners responded that they favored nnexation 34 TL 300 Otis g TL 600 van & P -A ;ty Whitaker L 700' Peter Schmidt' rth of the n the City of 'ri ardl Property to' site is the no and is urde� eloped: . -. .' undi �t ace develo••ed with Prop erties to the ea p shin ton Oo • ether ��arro n proper a� re .. n a c g .• l y To the aQ aannd r y g e w eslot t er� e � l aargce r e w� oosdin e d le p afracemils �. ...o f r ehseidtweneecen s '® a 5 and 3 a, csouep s, with single fami y r si.dences Property to the north is othed surroundin 1 pro pert ies ar a �toned 'Washir gt ®K. Oou,nty R 6 athe .: l � untsp •er acre � o (Resides i.a , p average e sub eGt prespert. slope$ to the not lwest a n av grade of 7.5��. There is a drainage co' rse along the wester i • Final Order =- Page. n• • ..o • rt- t.0 Exhibit A Proposal 2930 property boundary. The area is largely open with 'grasses and a few trees scattered throughout the property. . The territor; proposed for annexation is within the regional Urban Gro t th Boundary and the boundary of METRO. �. The territory is ' designated. Urban on the, Washington County Coe Framework Plan. County zoning for the the site is R -6; 6 units per acre. The territory is within the County's Bul i Mountain Cowaun ity Planning Area. the Count p . "active e City and �; have adopted ' an Urban. Planning Thy C�, y Planning area Agreement (UPAA) Which designated responsible fariax planning and an "area of interest" within which the City does not conduct comprehensive planning but does maintain an interest in plan- ning ning and development actions by the County because of potential impacts an the City' active planning area. This territory is within the Area of Interest. Washington County reviewed its role in service provision in its County 2000 program. The County adopted a service deliv- ery system which distinguishes between municipal and county- wide Ayer vices in n attempt to achieve tax fairness and expenditure equity in the provision of public services. It is County policy that all County taxpayers should psi for those service which are County -wide, and that s municipal aer-► provided district 6. vice, are to be L°cvided �y ciders or diet Th ; City it y of Ti and has a n acknowledged ed City Limits p iane The City o Tigard and g' County have entered into an Urban Planning Area Agreement (UP AA ) whic h is a part ; of both the County's and the City's adopted comprehensive Plana. The Active Planning Area within whi City LL. UP�iA sets taut an �� ch the assumes respon ;ib1litlr for land use Planning and an Area of County y g ' r lan Interest in which the �jau��t. a rase to coordinate! is plan- ning al impacts on the adiaoent city. ni.ng due �o the p ®� '� Under the UPAA„ the City agrees to com�vert County pla g and zoning designations to ones which are most closely approximated in the City s ordinances. In 1986 _ . The Bull Mountain n c rbar Th the city The stud.. describes conducted! Services Study. Cit;�� ®f Tigard the area and d� gcusse �.�..�®.,._. service rov s1ono expenditure requirements and rev'enue rep P o y,.. City adopted �-. ors nne a p: �. declaring . . ._. ec �i Based on this stud. the Ci an Y, : ... .._. services _. .... icy,,, � it... the area �irounupt�n urban Servi Pot s willingness to la and ultimately provide urban services in t... the F.ta x Ducar Page 6 • txhibl,t` A Proposal 2930 current Cijy limits® The area proposed for annexation falls within the territory covered by this study and policy. The City of ,.Tigard City Council considers an annexation and the rezoning of property. concurrently. f., nY Zoo. ,ng approved though this prooOss does nab become effective until the SOundary Commission order is final. The City approved a zone change for this property determining that it be designated R...79 Single family ' residential9 59000 square foot ninimum lot sizes® The City's Staff report contains the foll owing findings onci conclusions oonoertnine the compliance of the annexation and zone change wit i the City plan: "The relevant criteria in this _ 6 case are Tigard Compre- hensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, Citizen Involvement; 4n 1, Developing Areas, 10.1.19 Service a /iverY Ca aoiti ; and n 3� p,. ` 3 A" �Cn1� 2 ��aunda�r. Criteria and chat Hers 18013�+,� Annexa- tions; and 18.1389 l stab1ished/Ceveloping Area Classi- fication of the Tigard Community Development Code. The planning staff 'z,..*m determined . that the proposal is con - sistent with the ..:levant portions of the Tigard Compre- hensive Plea based upon the findings noted below: "16 Plan Policy 241.1 is satisfied because the Neigh ' ,borhood'Planning Organization and Community Plan ping Organization as Well 1'08 surrounding property o gners were, given notio- (5: the hearing and an opportunity to comment On .t'c;1e re 1uee t,. Plan Policy' 6.441 is satisfied because the annexa . tion will be designated as a dev loping area on the planned de� �e sit develo . ment standards map. Thi. w.r* deli .nation wil. P P allow the . use o�. p � ' l�l�m.; <. techniques which are bettAr s ,iced for preserving natural amenities such as those found on the subject prop- erty, Plan licy 10.1.1 is satisfied because the city has conducted the Bull Moue tein/Wa,iut Area Urban Services Study Which includes the subject property. This st a y as well as the cc'nlEne�i`nts from the police d r 1 rt. a providers .. .. De ei°t�rera e and other se�°v,�ic�e indicate that adequate services are available in the v oin ity and may be extended to accommodate the subject property r "4. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the annexa- tion will not create an irregular City boundary, the police Department has been notified of this request, the land is located within _ thin Tigar d's Area of Interest, and adequate service capacities can be m +,de available to accommodate the ev ntua1 develop °wat of the property as noted above. "The planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the £ endings noted below: 'a14 section 18.136.030 of the Code is met because all facilities and services can be made available, the applicable Comprehensive Pi €in.. policies discussed above have been satisfied and the property has been determined to be a developing area in accordance vs th the criteria in Chapter 10. 138 of the Code. "The Urba n Planning Area A g re��ent beween the City and g. n County' requires that when ar, nexin ;'laid within Washington � � the City's area of interest, the City adop t a zone designation which most closely resembles the County plan and zone designation. In this case,, however, the prole' erty is zoned in Washington County for single family res- idential usc, with a minimum lot size of 59 000 square feet and a maximum density of six units per acre. The City of Tigard R-7 zone density is 4.5 units per acre with a min imum lot size of 79500 square feet. With an identical minimum lot size requirement and maximum density of seven units per acre is the most comparable to the present County designation." t12. Chapter 18.138 of the Codo is satisfied because the property meets tLe definitinn for a developing area and shall be designated as such on the development standards area map. The terri Cory. is. within the f g. ncy (USA). 8. between the City and USA, Agency he Unified fewer Under an agreement b e A, the . City main- tains tains all sewer lines under 24 inches in Size. The bistrict Q, ntain s all larger lines and operates the treatment facil- ities. There is an. 8 -inch saattary sewer line in SW 135th Ave. 540 ft. east of t `e territory located on tax lot 2100 which 3a Exhibit A Proposal 2930 approximately 400 feet north of Walnut Street. The costs to extend the service to the subject property are $19.785 and it is proposed that these will be financed by the developer in cash, with participation from adjoining, owners that hook up to the system. Only those properties that annex to the City will be able to connect to the sewer. The Unified Sewerage Agency bills customers $15.50 per month or $186 per year. Its hook -up fee is $1500 for a single family dwelling. USA also has an assessment of $36 annually per dwelling unit for storm drainage services. USA assesses property tax which g oes towards payment of bonds sold to construct major district wide improvements and regional treatment plants. This tax, _ which for the 1990 -91 tax year is $.2537 per $1,000 assessed value p would remain the same. The City bills monthly at $13.50 or $162 per year. The City charges a $150 storm drainage surcharge for residential users. The hook -up foe for a single family dwelling in the City is $1235 which includes a $35 inspection fee. 9. The territory is within the Tigard Water District which serves the southern and western portions of the City. The District buys water from Lake Oswego and the City of Portland. The District has 6 inch high pressure mains in Walnut St. at the east edge and in Fern St. at the south edge g of the territory. 10. The territory is within the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District. Annexation will not effect this service as the District provides fire service to the City, which does not have a fire department. 11 Upon r annexe tion to the City, the territory will be automat- ically ica l ly wi thdrawn from the Washington CountY Enhanced .Sher- District and the $.77 per thousand District tax Distr�� willsnoalonger be .levied on the site. The County provides es a longer oy � d base level of police. service and the District finances the additional level of service to bring the service level to one officer per thousand population. m.ment will Subsequent to annexation the Tigard Police Departs provi ,e police protection to the territory. The City' pro - vides a service level of one officer per 700 residents. Emergency response in the City is Under five minutes. 12. Upon annexation the territory will be automatically vithdrawn Final Order - Page 9 from the unfunded Wa hington County Vecto`.,�r•Co atrol District' The territory i s 'i tht �Yn the bou nds ry of the a sahington County annexation The district provides services e Service District No. '� from which , it will be ` utomat$.oally 'withdrawn upon e area u. on request and 'uses local i iprOvement districts to finance the . services. The territory to be annexed is not ithin a ' benef'itted area. .'lie' CitY of Tigar�d.Pays for' street lighting costs out of its Street Fund which has as its pri- mary source of revenue State ohaPed gasoline tax money. 4j Q Th � J Cit. of Tigard operates 6 parr, systee funded through the d�G, city genera, fund • property tax levy. The system consists of one city -wide park one community park, four neighborhood parks and three mjni-parks The teL r : Cory is within ' he unfunded Washington ounty Ser- vice which it would �ioe �9��tr�t for Urban Roads I�ain�.en��,no� fr�� phi be automatically withdrawn, upon annexation, to the City. REASONS FOR bECISIONS Based on the Findings the Commission determined that: 1. The pop osal should be modified to include tax lots. 300, 600 requested annexe e on eoause they desire sanitary seer ser- vices. Tho proposal is consistent with planning w par+els have and 'O0 in Obrs Hsi hts. The *Wners +� Of these e City has an adequate quantity and quality of service available to serve the area. The roposal' is consistent with the Boundary. Commission ° s policy y y on Incorporated status . (OAR 193 -05-,005). Final Orden Exhibit Prop'esal Na. 2930 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ANNEXATION TO City of Tigard Lots 4 it' 5 Handy s hin toga County/ Or ..gen including that portion ' of the 50 foot wide ublia, right-of-way beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 5 and encing south by the extension the westerly ',tine of Lot 5 to the southerly 11,f of S.W. 1 t t (ubli rig s Of ) right-of-way line to the southerly erly extension of the easterly of Lot 4; thence north to the southeast corner of Lot 4; thence westerly along the southerly boundaries of Lots 4 4 5 Handy Acres to the 'point of , b gitming INCLUDING Lots 2„ 4 . and 9 CRS HEIGHTS, Washington County, Oregon. Revised 7/12/91 Final Oder - Page 11 SE1 /4 NW1 /4 SECTION 4 T2S, R1W `W. Washington County, Oregon ,Scale: 1" = 2OO t. Vico *700 •sa ac, MOO JUVX. AO Ad fito PROi'OSAL ;NO 2930 CITY .OP `Y'G1RO ANNMAT IOC FIG�,1E ,�: x �� •�t " �" a yip" STATE or 47►?E ON County of Washington City of Tigard Xm depp e and say- (Please `rolmt That X am a 11 +� y .1i1..., for The city of Tigard, Oregon. That I Oervec NOTICE TICE O PUBLIC NEARING FOR: R%" T;Iat 3 serve s NOTICE OF !ECXSICN FOR: City of Tigard Plann Lng Director ____Tigard Planning commlasion Tigard ',car i.aagn Officer Tigard (city Council 7 copy (Publid Bearing Notice/Notice df hLbit 7) Was mailed to each na> attached list marked exhibit "E" on the said mid oC a D XOY as he - to day of ill the .Unite r Mail on the , States �a�. Po, age Prepaid. rai eked Decision) of which is attach ( sons at th ad ess shown Pile (PY.. 1 st �;; on appropr a tta.�hr was � :.� o 19 ..J. and dew day of Person who delivered to POST O$?FICE Sub Bribed and sworn/affirm to me on the _19 day Prot pit ?7,Y 11,3 e, • caT OF TXGARD waahington count; , Oregon NOTICE of FINAL ORDER d R/t BEARINGS OFFICER . Concerning Gale NO er (s) : C0 ',10A910 Q*1 Applicants .,�.,... • Addraaa §_ pox 62 ,�...- City p HiAdMglg 6aatM w .. 2214_9__ • Addreaa of Property: 13735 SW Walmut St & :1. 24AW . teg_ti: Tax 'Nap ane3 Left NIo (e) .: 281 4B c: 10t400 2Si 4 ,U tax ,lot 1500 . 01e w t r Are estadi asasreal► d..de e y l er Ott =..nd 1 R :� reWeteg ,,,„w a r ®rerimateL � e,rV7 gore eit� �. �� 2 been x.2041 i +a'jOl S30 a are 0NE: R- 1_dRenidentia1 • 7 .units acre . dos_ mmaitoWne Approval as' re nested Approval with Conditions Denial • ggtLagL, p e newspaper, ported at City Hall, �a�ti�e� was It�bl3»skAe�a�l in th and mailed t®. x T ofrecorddwit within require -w-- -- applicant d distance The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization — Aff+�e�ted governmental agencies 8. dal peciaiant T EI ION S � l FINAL ON October IS FILED. UNLESS AN APPEAL I The adopt d findings of fact, decision, nd scat met of conditions can an be obta ine d from the Planning Department, Ti sx3 City Hall, 13125 SW Hall, P.Ok Bolt 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. at �aJ. . Any party t. o the decisi on may appeal l this decieton in accordance with 18. 3 ( d c which ides that a written appeal may filed within 10 day s ftet notice given and sent. The p eal may b submitted on ta3tty forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee ($316.00) and transcript coats var iee0 up to a maximum of $500.00) . ru The deadline for filing of an appeal i . 3:30 p.m.' a btober_; , 1191 ,,,,,,„,�,,, 10. Q2 FtkansL If you have any gueetionep please cal l the a City of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171i 4:a tct ea w cot BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS °RA ER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, ° ON In the mattar of an application by Paul Miller far a preliminary plat for a 22-lot s ., i i the R-7 zorie ) north of SW Fern Stmt and west of SW 135th Avenue ) in the City of Tigard, Oregon L SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests amoral of a preliminary plat to subdivide 4917 acres into a 28-lot subdivision. Proposed lots comply with the dimensional requirements of the .m7 zone, but only partially fulfill the solar access standard for new development. An adjustment to the solar access standard rd is =quested due to slope, tree cover, i s street ration, Proposed gle family to The site will Ise served by l ®ts��df�s� ;, �•, � y public water and sanitary sewer and a storm water drainage system. FINAL ORDER SUB 91 -0012 (Rose w) To provide access to the subdivision, the • plicant will improve Fern and Walnut Streets adjoining and off the site to a minimum 22-foot paved �p on. The off-site improvements do not irtolude sidewalks. The applicant will extend �, alnnut Street east west across the site and will create a new north -south street Fern Street to Walnut Street. A stub street will extend to the north edge of the site from the west end of Walnut Street (extended). A private street with a hammerhead turn- d will provide access to six lots on the site. A public hearing was held August . 26. City staff subdivision i p .� was �' recommended approval ot� the �sao subject to conditions. The applicant and his tative generally recommended conditions of approval. Seven area residents testified with about storm water flows to the and west, vehicle and foot tic on g Fern rid Walnut Streets, impacts g mnning nearby, underground tanks on the site, and privacy/security. The Hearings ms s° held the record 10 day s to receive additional written testimony and evidence. LOCATION: 13735 SW Walnut Street; WCIM 1 4BD; Tax dot 400 13275 SW Fern Stmt WCTIA 2S1 411D, Tax lot 1500 APPLICANT: Paul Miller SI'M EA About 4.97 acres APPLICABLE SAW. Community Development Code Ch. 18 .52, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164; Comprehensive . A . o �. i . . 1 4.2.1, 7 2 7.3.1, Plan Policies 21. , .. , . . 7.4.4, 8+1.1, and 8.1.3; and, the Boll Mountain Communivy Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Os, rationally approve HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION', Conditionally approwi It FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURAOUNDINGS A. Site size and shape The site is roughly a rectangle about 640 feet north -south and 340 feet east -west contains about 4.97 acres consistin3 contain ;;,�3 and 3.64 acres. ., of two tax. lots that co Page 1 » lle®rinns Officer decry oat SOD 91 -0012 (Rose Meadows) E. Site location The site is situated north of and adjoining SW Fern Sit about 500 feet west of SW 135th Avenue. SW Walnut Street stubs into the east edge of the she C. Existing uses and structures The subdivision site contains two single f r ty pesidence.s, one at the nog .h ast comer and o' e at the southeast comer. The i maistler of the site is mostly pasnare. D. Proposed uses and structures 1. The applicant proposes to divide the site into 28 lots. A sine family detached dwelling will be built on each propose,/ last: The average lot size is a. Proposed lots contain 5,0 to 1 2p6„0 .,rte feet. � 5 934 Nom feet. All lots have; a ?.lini�! :na street fit tage of 25 feet All lots are at least 50 feet wide and 98 feet deep. b. Eleven of the proposed lots hat a -south lot depth of at least 90 feet and a front lot line dented wit hi 3G of a true east-west line However, six of those lots and four other lots have a slope, of more than 10% °dented more than 45' west of true south. Two more lots ate not oriented for solar access because of the pis street cool `on. Six itoo -s P1ar lots could be =oriented 90e to con ily with the basic ing costs or reducing omelettes Acts 18, 19,, 20, 21, 27, and 2 If the ten steeply sloped lots and two acs ess- diictated lots are adjusted out„ then the subdivision must have a 13 lots that comply with the solar access standard. If the six lots noted above are reoriented then 11 lots in the subdivision 'tl1 comply with the basic solar standard. An adjustment to waive the solar aCcF„s requirement for two additional lots is requested d'to street configuiation constraints. 2. Access will t ptovid by extending SW Walnut Street from an citing stub at the east edge of the site to a new stub at the west edge. A new north -south street to be known as SW Rose Meadow Lane is pro t ' to extend from 1''ern Street to Walnut Street. A new private street a t with a hammerhead non. and extend east of Rose Meadow Lane but 300 feet north of Fero Street. A new stub half- street will extend from Walnut Stmt to the north edge of the site along the west edge of the site Il 3. The applicant will build storm and stutitary seweis on the site and will extend water across the site. E. Existing and proposed Vegetation The site is .mostly tilled pasture. There one mature deciduous and conifer trees at the southeast comer of the site. The exact nvni er of trees to, be removed wti11 depea4 upon the whe' the final bu mg envelopes and driveways a located. The Hearings Officer assumes the applicant will use vegetation and other means to minimize the potential for erosion during construction, and that owners of lots will landscape those lots after they build homes on them. The laud crest and southeast of the site is heavily wooded, Page 2 rants Officer dab SLUR 91 -0012 (Ro3e Meadow's) F. Topography and dr, „age 1. The site slopes gettnsdly to the northwest at a ante of up to 20%, although most of the site is sloped 15% oat less, with decreasing slopes to the west- northweut. 2. Thew is not a ublii storm sewer applicant p°'”. ° is P ' � err t� serve the ��, The a !lean¢ ses to direct ° streets on the site, to collect that water in catch basins, to storm water principally carry that water thiough pipelines within n public rights of way to the northwest corner of the site. From that point, the applicant proposes either a) to pipe the water another 300 feet west across adjoining . channel or (b) to the to a public storm sewer t o be built as part of the planned unit development pipeline approved f r land north of dm site. The pli t must obtain an easement to pipe ° pp water across adjoining g iaimt l if that option is to be used In either case, the applicant must show that runoff after develop pent does not exceed the c .. anti of cans storm water feames and that there is not mese runoff than before development 3. City s recommend the applicant also provide easements across the rear of lots alonts the west edge of the site to collect surfstoe surf water drainage from those lots (where they t,ks not drain to the street) and : argy that water north or east to the storm sewer. i based on the US the � s of Ens" eers 4. The site does not contain flood plain, L flood plain maps. It does Griot contain wetlands, based on USFWS National Wetlands Inventory and :raps prepared for the City by Scientific Resources, es, Inc. G Plea designation and zoning 1. The site was annexed to the City by a alt ° site May fl �;1. Surrounding oraler dated 1Ula. 30 199' land is unincorporated Washington Coun except the adjoining land to the north. 2. The City Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site and adjoinikig land to the north as Medium Density Residential. The adjoining property to the north also 'contains land designated Mediu ;t '. -High Density residential and Neighborhood Coal. 3. The City zones the site R -7 (Residential, 7 wits/acre). ). " le adjoining land to the , north is zoned R -12 ; re 2. The , 'te can be served ill/ the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, Tigard Water District, General Telephone, Portland, General Electric, and Tualatin-Tigard School District 234 I. Streets and access 1. SW Walnut Street terminates at the east edge of the site. has a roughly 20-foot paved seedon between shoulders, but not curbs side�wal k . The applicant proposes to extend this strtiet on die site as described in finding lii).2, and to improve it consistent with City local stmt standeatels. Between the site and 135th Avenue, Washington Como, . recommends the street be improved to a 22 -foot paved width and a from Scott King to Jerry e applicant a r. to (see y �r tit 19 wearing surface and life expectancy not less than 5 years see letter dated A � eray �. � applicant , , this Area residents requested that applicant build a sidewalk along Walnut Sty. from the site to 135th Avenue. The applicant declined to make that improveraent. 2. The site has about 470 feet of frontage along SW Fern Street. The street row has a roughly 20 -foot paved section? but not sidewalks or curbs. The applicant proposes to improve the site frontage consistent with City local street standards. Between the site and 135th Avenue, Washington County recommends the street be improved to a 22- foot paved width and a wearing surface ; d life expectancy not less than 5 years (see letter +' ; :ted August 19 from Scott King to Jerry Offer). The applicant a to . ... make this improvement. To conform p plan, a nevi street will extend north onto that firm moved. 3. Alix plan fax development of the to the north has q the site. a to The centerline of the street is dedicate foot wide right of way and to improve the light The ppiiat proposes �or'a local street Y way to half-width standards f , Walnut Street to the north edge of the site. aty staff recommend a 24 -foot paved section with curb and sidewalk this would require a minimum 30-foot partial-width right of way air a 5 -foot easement for the sidewalk imp addition to a 25-foot right of way. If the street is built north of the site, it will provide access to the Scholis Ferry Road corridor and other destinations. IN 4. The applicant will dedicate right of way for and eve SW Rose Meadow Lane to local street standanis. Improvement of Rose Meadow Lane and Walnut Street provide EOCCSS for dwellings adjoining Fern Street west of the site to 135th Avenue, avoiding a steep hill` on Fern Street east of, the Site. 5. The applicant will provide access to six proposed lots by means of a private street to extend east from Rose Meadow Lane �e hammerhead o ,d grate . _ v�.11 improve r � turn- around. The applicant will create a 30- to 32-foot access tractor the prop s� pri street and the street with a mininium 24 -foot paved section with curb and sidewalk on , ,.� r side. J. Surrounfling land uses Land south, and east is halo -mere mostly forested lots�vL ad developed the with s is family developed f avri oversized d � the west, so �s with structures, but has been approved for a mixed-use project including single and multi- family Laming and retail uses. Page 4 - Hearings Ofk r Jecisiort SUB 91 -0012 (dose Meadows) 111. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Co rnw' iKy Development Code. 1. Chapter 13.52 commix' standanis for the R-7 zone. A single family tathed residential unit is a permitted use in the zone. Lots in the zone and structures on those lots must comply with the following dimensional menu. Minimum lot size Average � /t minimum lot width Frontsetback .......... .... Garage setback neor side setback is..oe d. o.a +.... St#eetside setback Rear setback .r . • ..o. oos.....os.e6.ae.....e Maximum 68Y ding height......, 5000 squat feet 50 feet 15 few 20 feet 5 feet 10 feet t ® 15 fleet 35 feet 2. Chapter 18.88 contains solar access standards. ~. t north-south dimension of 90 feet or �, A lot complies with firs' tg ®n if it has a ffia- note, and has a front lit line that is oriented with 30 deign= of a true east: west ` ° : design s�.nda�); :� a protected solar building nne is designated on the axis �� plat or on t ccorded documents with the plat plau4nr if certain performance-oriented standards imposed on future development. A subdivision complies with this section if 8091 or more of the proposed lots comply with one or MOM of these standards. Section 18.88140(E) (Adjusts (Adjustments to Design t the • t� Standards) states that i , approval authority shall reduce the percentage of lots that, must comply the with Section 18 R8a c=) (Design Standards) to die extent tiecesstry if it finds applicant has shown compliance with the basic design stkridardt would reduce density, significantly increase development cost, or eliminate- amenities or if shade from exiseing trees already y obs solo access for a g ve,n lot. Also exempts from cofpliance lots that are sl ► r, >' 10% or' : in a °dhectidn 45' or more east or west of true south. 3. Chapter 1892 contains standards for density. The reamber of dwelling units sensitive land areas ds and land pertriitt is based on the net development arm excluding `� e�cl dedicated for public ids or parks. To denermine the nernber (of lots, multiply the net development area by the number of units allowed per awe lathe wine. 4 Chapter 18,102 requires that adequate visibility be provided i ° .. ` ed at mad intersections. p + ha ter 18,10; provides standards for ' i i driveway ��s �fe access, A private common pe . e ,L up to dwellings. A diivewa`y serving to six dwellings angst permitted av i 9ini1nor1 paved width of 24 feet between curbs with sidewalk on one side. A subdivision permanent i vIl^iQ.JI1 c�l� have ° �. chapter 1 x.114 coirtt�i�►s sign eons. Face at each entryone free-standing sign with up to 32 sqt feet per sign 7. Chapter 18.15 requires pe e t and contains standards for removal of trees having a �' diameter he ground on undeveloped land. A . ter '� feet above a trunk inches or noire in ., . permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria! Page 5 - Officer decision SUB 914012 (Row Mecid®ews) a. The trees iat diseased, present a danger to property, of interfere wit:g utility service € traffic sa.fety; b. The trees have, to be removed to constaret proposed briprovernenta or to otherwise utilive the applicant's intperty in a nruasner; e. The tees are not needed to prevent ark-ion, abiIky, r doinara problems; d. The trees are not 'wed to protect nearly tees as windbreaks Jr as a desirable • • ttalancebetweat shade and tqten space; c. The aesthetic character in the aea, will not by visually adversely aftocted by the tree removal; and f. New vegan planted by the tayiplicant, if any, will eplace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut 8. Chapter 18.160 contains standatais for land divisions. To be appitoved, preliminaty plat must cLanaply with the following criteria: a. It must comply with the City's contiprehensive plan and•the apolicable zoning ordin' ance and VA er applicable °met and regulations; b. The proposed pla,t Tstame is notduplicative or otherwise sat the poviaions• of ORS C, 'a ter 92; c. The streets and mad • are laid oat so as to conform to the plats of subdivisions and maps of major ratrti dons already proved for adjoining property as to width, general direction and i l 'oiler respects unless the City detarnaines'it is in the public interest to mod:fy the street or road pattern ... 9. Chapter 18.164 contains st-anftds for streets and utilities. a. Section 18.164.030(A) requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of the street. b. Section 18.164.030(E) requires a local street to be improved with a reinignava 24-foot paved section between cabs and si6owa1lts in a 504 oot right of way. c. Section 18,164.060 prohibits lot depth from being iore than 2-1/2 times the lot width- and requires at least 25 feet of frontage on a street, d. Section 18.164.070 requites sidewalks adjoining all local velidential streets. e. Section 18.164.090 requires sanitary sewer service. f. Section 18.164.100 requires adequate provisions for swim water mnol and dedication of easements for sum drainage facilities. ....• • .• 4 B. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. 1. Rollos 2.1.1 pi+ovides the City will assume citizens will be provided an opportunity for be itiv o'ved in all phases o the planning process. 1 Policy 4.2.1 provides that all developments within the Tigard Urban. Planning Area shall comply with applicable fedea, state and regional water quality standards. 3. Policy 4.33 states that the op! ° ill require development proposals located in a noise- congestted ,isra to into p .'ate the following into the site plan: a. Buildings will be placed on a site whsce noise levels have the least in pac b. Landscaping and other techniques will a to lessen noise impacts to levels compatible with the surrounding land uses 4. Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 ,wide the condition of will a co public water sewer and storm drainage will be pi vided development approval that aa'h C4- n water, designed PP�ty P placed underground. and desr ed to City standards and utilities laced under 5. Policy 8.1.1 provides the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and madway system that meets cn rent needs and anticipated future growth and development. 6. Policy 8.1.3 provides the City will require as a precondition of approval that: a. Development abuts a dedicated stmt or has other adequate access; y i • 1Y • • th; b. Sweet right of way shall be dedicated where the street ,s substandard lastaa „��anxi rn width; c. developer •all commit constructior • ew.slks to c The �ie�elo shall aatnr�ont � constra�or � the streets, curbs and srd City standards within the development d. The developer six all participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the devel a4 s mpactsA Street improvements shall be mode and street signs signals provided e• si als sha�il vrded ev ; ll si, intensify traffic hated. when the dti..��.. ant is found to create or uYten�f a C. Bull Mountain Community Plan and associated implementing regulations: 1. ` nt: subject site is in the Bull Mountain Community Plan 1,1dtspted by Washington County. .• 0.' . -' Tigard � �n m �r t Develop ment e_ r t Plan d oe s n ot expressly l Y incorporate _ or r require, compliance ban� wath the terms of th� community plan, the plan itself anticipates leenent :®ntu g hghe _ development code, rather than by its s own terms. However, the City considers the recommendations of the community plan when aea:g on projects within its boundaries. In this case, relevant plan provisions the ,..... include the following general design elements. a' Ilog �,i r�ducir on measures shall be incorporated tot* all new zes ,d � development located adjacent to areriaD�, major collectors, and took quarries i es ... °.. Page 7 - Hearin2s O, Piker a`ecisk»2 . UE 9i -0012 (Rowe Meads) e' o 11.1=1=1..M■11101,011.11M.IMERI,[1.17 0 b. Review of land partitioning and structural development proposals for areas within one-half mile of rock quarries shall include measarercents of noise anticipated from such development and appropriate mitigation measures which ensure that the future land uses meet Giegon Department of Enviraimental Quality noise standards. 2. These noise-related design elements are implemented by Washington County. Community Development Code section 379-14. This section is general in its terms. For instance, it requires new noise sensitive uses to be located with respect to topography, transpeirtation features, and setbaciss to minimize the potential adverse effects of noise. Also it authorizes the Co ap-proval authority to require as a condition of approval that noise reduction rriCaSurr es he incorporated into new noise sensitive uses. Ja also requires owners of lots in noise sensitive areas to execute a waiver of rememance regarding noise and requires the plat to note the applicability of the lallinergand Aggregate District regulations. To implement the noise reduction section, the County typically requires a new single family home in area B of the Mineral and Aggregate District to incorporate 6-itich thick exterior walls with additional Insulation and triple pain windows facing the noise generating use. I). Uniform Building Code (UBC). Uniform Fire Code Section 79.115 requires removal o an underground tank within 1 year after the tank is abandoned W. HEARING, 'TESTIMONY, AND NM & AGENCY COMMENTS A. Hearing. The Hearings Officer received testimony at the public hearing about this application on August 26, 1991. The Hearings Officer left open the public record 10 days thereafter to receive additional testimony. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at tbe Tigard City Hall. B. Summary of selected testimony, 1. Jerry Offer summarized the City staff report and recommendation. • • is io a, He explained the zoning of the site, and its relation to the Washington County Plan and zonhig deaignations that applied to the site. He noted that the City rezoned the property R-7 when the property was annexed, because that was the zoning designation most similar to the Waalgton County zone that applied to the property before it was annexed This was consistent with the City-County Urban Growth Management Agreement The City aeas net aware the County Mineral and Aggregate District overlay Zone appiied to tie propeny before annexatiOn. The City does not have a zone like the Mineral md Aggregate District b. Mr. Offer argued the applicant should not be required to fence the site generally, because thew are no fence requilenients in the Code and the iiitie4 in and adjoining the site are the sante (i.e., single family detached residential development). However, a fence could be requited at the west stub of Walnut Street and along the vest edge of the northerly stub street to protect the privacy and Security of adjoining preperna and to minimize the potential for vandalism and illegal damping. Page 8 Hearings Oficer decision SUB 91-0012 (Rose Meadows) a. w c. Chris Davies also testified briefly about storm and Jsa itary sewers. In a memorandum introduced after the hearing, Mr. Offer described the Washington County provisions that, apply in the Minntd and Ag gate District. 2. Jim Harris testified for the applicant. He accepted the conditions of approval reservation re the width of the recommended by City staff ' w one rese mantling improvement uered for the stub street north of Walnut Street. He dertcribed the .. i cuts and fills) elk the site to justify the ap�licar►t's effort to minimize �1� (cues � , J � far the hammerhead cal de sac and solar access exceptions. The builder project, Paul Mill . Miller, also test in support of the project. He noted sewer lines will be extended as part of the project, g those lines accessible to surrounding j .i County. i pr � ` properties in the Coun Mr. Offer noted that the City will not provide sewer service to properties outside the City le ts„ concerns about drainage from the subject prmpe�► into 3. Scott Russell testified with t%� his property to the north. Mr. Offer, Mr. Davies and Mr. Harris responded. 4. Cal - Wooler.... y testified for NPO #7. Larry W.... est e Han testified f,,. r the Fern Ste et Neighborhood Association and CPO #4 and on his own behalf. Mr. Wester also submitted a written statement before the �4g and 2 written t statements after the hearin g. Several other Fern neighbors testified 'inch ding Donnel d Stephanie e Nikki Wiles, and Carol Boyle (CPO #4 President). Beverly udalso submitted a written statement. Most of these witnesses shared the following a. The City should itzvAte the i..plicant to build a sidewalk along at t one side between the site and 135th Avenue, because of the pedestrian of Walnut Street bee .. increase traffic the subdivision will generate, (e.g., a 6-fold in school age children), and because the .alil�lar traffic from the subdivision will endanger children walking along'A . +nut Street in the absence of a sidewalk. Witnesses noted that . . p � .5th Avenue intersection while area residents often park near the Walnut Street/135th . waiting for the school bus to arrive. Ms. Boyle noted that a bus pull-out is planned P ° north of the Walnut Street/135th Avenue intersection. h_ The ally � should a storm ewer runoff from the property does not increase r� off-site flows to the we or north or endanger existing trams to the West. u , The y rye noise mitigation measures like those in c The Ciu should ` corpo Washington with Mountain Plan,. unincorporated Wass . . i Several � to �� se mitigation a�ur� Several witnesses testified about g d. The City should require the applicant to remove the two underground storage tanks on the property. The applicant agreed. e. City applicant to install a fence or other measures to e The Ci should u the protect the privacy and gm-why of land to the west. _ty allow applicant a alk along ]Fen Street as f� The City should allow the, a Lit tech 4li�stin is necessary to preserve the maximum nuns g The g . City should equnre applicant ... sewer line in F��rn Street the a haunt to extend Rose Meadow Lane to the west edge of the site to make is possible to serve properties to the west. Page 9 - Hearings �D, ricer decision SUIT' 91 -0012 (Rose Me5do »s) 5. In rebuttal, Mr. Hanis made the following arguments, in pan: as Drainage and erosion control will be accommodated, based on the new storm water management rules adopted the Unified Sewerage Agency. An erosion control plan is requited and enforced b... the City. Therefore, the project is not reasonably like o cause excessive storm water runoff or erosiozJ ' b. The applicant should not be required to build the sidewalk between the site and 135th Avenue. If the owners of adjoining property want such a sidewalk, then they can build it. te. The construction of Rose Meadow Lane and improvement of Fern and Walnut Sheets will improve traffic and pedestrian safety and will make it possible for school buses to the Walnut Street/135th Avenue ��t�asectiarn once bus stops Haight . routed through the new subdivision. School bu of be mated at aln the subdivision is built. Mr. Westerman disputed that school buses would use Fern Street, because of the steep slope of the hill east of the site. C. NPO and Agency Comments. The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the findings regarding NpC) and agency comments in Section IV of the staff report dated August 26, 1991. C TO #4 also submitted a written statement dated September 1 in which they call ft r construction of a sidewalk along Walnut Street from the subdivision to 135th Avenue. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. Compliance with Community Development Code. 1. proposed y . � because they 1 � �r be u ed for single f arnnl detached dwellings. standards �f i:o ly with zone, dimensional R-7 Y requite 7 zone, because main at least square feet and have requirements of the R they coin an average lot width of at least 50 feet. The existing dwellings on proposed lots 1 and 15 will comply with applicable setbacks, based on the prelim nary plan, 2. The subdivision bdn�nsrorn Bann comply with Section 18:88, the access standards for new ..: PY development, p provided lots 18 and 19, 20 and 21, and 27 and 28 are reoriented so their long as s is no south. Steep non -south slopes and street orientation warrant an adjustment pursuant Section 18.88A40( E), because greater eompliance with the basic standard would reduce the permitted number of lots and substantially increase per unit costs of development. t ;ee the solar analysis in the application and findings at pages 10 and 11 of the Staff Report dated August 26. because � net developable �r�a of the site divided density standards of Chapter 18.92, .. f P i 3. The proposed subdivision � by 7 units per acre equals 33 lots, and only 28 lots are proposed. 4. The proposed subdivision complies with Chapter 18.108, because ail lots will have adequate access to one of the newly created streets. However, to comply with this section, the private street , continuous sidewalk t shoo �- 1 should be provided along at feast one side of private road. The private sheet should be identified. as g such on the face of the plat and on the ground. Parking should be P rohibited on the private street, because of its narrow width. Page 10 - Hearings Officer declaim SUB 91 -0012 (Rase MeadoVss) 5. Chapter 18.114 establishes standards for si zes and locations of signs. Such sign(s) req • � assumes the � , 32 square feet per side. The u permit f the and cannot meet' Hearing City will rcq £Yc pllance vvith this Chapter before issuing a permit for a sign. 6. The propo sed su,v9sioat can comply with Chapter' 15.10 if the applicant submits a detailed tree survey showing; the size and location of trees that exceed 6 inches in diameter measured 4 feet above tirade. Such a survey its necessary to enable the City to enforce the tams of Chapter 18.150. A two stage tree permit n g process can he used to nshinize any potential delays associated with tree surveys. The Hearings Officer can authorize variations in sidewalk location within available rights of way to acco nodate preservation of t s, and delegate autholity to ► City Engineer to decide what variations should be allowed based on detailed plans. A note on the faee of the plat or a provision in the covenants and restrictions for the 4lubd ivision should advise potential lot purchasers that Koval of eignificant tress is subject to review and approval by the City, 7. ' 'l'he proposed subdivision complies with Chapter 18i60,' use a. It complies with the Comprehensive plan map designatie, i of the site, the complies plan policies, the regulations of the R -7 zone, an ,~ether applicable regulations. b. The imposed name of the subdivision is not duplicative, c. The sod streets provide for adequate ' nd safe act less to adioia�sm. g streets, pm -sided Walnut and Fe Streets are roved off -site consistent wish 'Washington County recommendations. See alsafinding V.A 8. g. The proposed subdivision complies wish Chapter 18.164, because pP � portions of site fronting S'�V. a. The applicant will dedicate land for and ire Fern Street to local street standards. b. The applicant will dedicate .. p. ' &e land for and nnr ve the red ;mental streets with pavement, cub, gutter and sidewalks City pp will dedicate land for and. improve the to � Standa9 The applicant also z�walhs .w:pro proposed private, sheet to City Standards. The applicant area pm► de for street extensions ins to the edge of the site. Condi i a warranted to facilitate compliance with these stand ids (1) If the street to the north is built centered on the west edge of the site, then there will be a sudden reduction from two lanes to one lane as that road enters th sect site has a wider subject property. . This could pose a traffic hazanl. If the stub street on the th er paved surface than a . ~%ndard halffwidth, then the street to the north could be offset to the east side of the right of { way and the difference in street width between the two sites would be minimizot (2) To ensure the northerly stns street is safe, the applict should improve „lass y,_ ... � .s sufficient for 2-way traffic and �d�° a b and sidewalk for the d The Hearings Officer should delegate authority to the City engineer to deterrnine tl'te . i paved - � aged wide. that can safely accommodate two-way traffic consistent hemwith and to prescribe the right of way necessary therefore.' Page 11 - Hearings Deer decision SUB 91-0012 (Bose Meadows) i,, (3) If the applicant must for the north stub street to accommodate feet for � partial-rvidth right of way Mprov ts, at min not reduce the number of lots in the subdi vision, although the width of one or more of lots 15 through 19 would have to be r iced to provide the additional right of way: (4) �' street land to the west and north on the subject site could be hazardous �) �.�� W,1 ®d'stub is moped and the mad is extended. Signage and be°ti es can prevent the partially bnproved street from causing unsafe traffic ' conditions and loss of privacy and security until then. (5) Due to the stun slope and lindtcd sight distance along Fern Street east of the site, dim vehitailar access for lot 3 should be restricted tm Rose Meadow Lane. c. Lots frontage are driveway than s! %2 times more deep than wide and ha ►e a 25-foot street . All lots w be served public water., sanitary sewer and stern drainage s • • systems. Conditions are warranted requiring the applicant to show adequate storm ru soft provisions have been and that easements for storm •draina e water y facilities have granted where they mss pawn c property: In addition to features shown on the lignin drainage plan, private storm drainage easements and app wry improvements should be pruvisied along the west edge of the site to collect stoim water and to direct that water to the yiuhlic storm drainage system. e. City Code Section 18.164.070 requires sideways along all local streets. However it does not require an applicant to provide sidewalks off- site:' The Hearings Officer has no express authority in the Code to reopthe off-site improvements conditions • 2 n relationship , given (1) Conditions an be imposed on app oval l of a ven if those bear a to the nnpact of the development and there is a le "tiinate public purpose served. It is relativel. to show a p conditions relatively reasonable reltdionship between ` tians regarding mad improvements adjoining a site, so they seldom disputed. It is harder to show such a . " Y P �`• 1 required for a rclationshn off -site, so off :site n non pmmlect of the size under consideration: seldom are improvements (2) The testimony of Walnut Street neighbors and others describes the impact of the subdivision on walnut Street east of the site The subdivision will generate about 30 school age children and about 280 vehicle trips per day. The road now serves only 5 children and anestimated t� 80 vehicle flips per day: Most of the vehicle t riF .... s from the subject site will be along Walnut Sftet, based on the shortest route between most likely origins and destinations This shows. • . i. affect estnan safety along :.. u the absence of standards th Code, the question for the Hearin t Street. In the subdivision will aft and traffic. sofa iron w Officer is is significant • . ,„ requiting p .. wt�vBd� the side�w�a�lk off= si ens to girt applicant to l (3) . . wide Walnut Street . y (:� � �2 foot a between the site and 135th avenue can safer p r � : ate some volume of elan and vehicular traffic without a sidewalk The question IS how much? Page HS s; „.. 8 etig t tp' deeisi SUB 91 -0012 (Rose Mi" do +s) s (4) Based on the record, it is likely most chJdren in the subdivision will walk along Walnut S .''. t to a bus stop at 135th Avenue. Assuming 100% of traffic . , � "� the subdivision also from existinff ad3oa�g homes and 80% of the tom:. r , ` would use '` � rainut Street, then the street would citify abu'4t 300 vehiele trips per day. Roughly 30 of those gips would be during the peak hour, based on typical traffic engineering assumptions, when school age children also may be present waiting for a bus. hi's is a worst case condition for purposes of ' analyzing ... whether a sidewalk is warranted. Would those 30 vehicle trips constitute a hazard to the 35 children if there is not a sidewalk? It is a cic. a cad. (5) The Hearings Officer finds that the impact of the .moral pedestrian and vehicular .tic on Walnut Street is not sufficiently adverse or significant the applicant to rovide a sidewalk along the as t the ' V warrant tti�ring aPP �' P ve�� condition of appmv d of the subdivision, given the off site applicant will wake to Walnut Stmt and the slight degree of bawd resented by the street without the sidewalk. There will be some increased hard. That • ' o is inevitable, because of the incr. c It sim ply is not enough to warrant the the ap plicant to remedy the +condition in the absence �ce of City policy or standards g ,�-.- . , s' The Hearings o'er encourages the Qty to d the !'� „cle to authorize imposition of conditions regarding off -site road unprs�vcine is and 0 provide :.. ciitena for the impsitiol of such canditions provides for appropriate barricades where a street stubs to the fd The City Code pray . - � , edge of the site the applicant to (1) Based on that standard, a condition is warranted requiring pP t west stub of Walnut Street and along install a ��un1 6-foot high fence at the :�►es • the west and north edges of the stub street between Walnut Sit and the north edge of the site (2) A fence is not warranted south of Walnut Street, because of the • ilarity ("� � uses detached dwellings Single family detach . a • site and a�.�es � the west. air the density on and � . between uses. on the s incompatible, on and off the site are not inherently although - ” will be different. While fences protect privacy, they also separate off the site Where neighboring uses simila •, construction of fences is left to :.:. rely' boas. owners so that potential neighborhood interaction is not private property impeded summarily. or. . Compliance ce with Comprehensive Plan policies. The subdivision complies with Policy 2.1.1, because notice of the application or 1w • P vicinity .. d P� . ,. d. I .. an to the ... . oP anlZcit]lA►nS 11C� '�1e ea arld t0 • . provided to the tiel borhoo�+ leg g owne or p p y The concerns raised by public, City Dealers of ro x have been tiered � reaching this decisicinY staff and agencies ha is warranted In order to comply with Policy 4.2...: , ' arranted r fig the an erosion insuring oil anditx ®n n F insui�g pli�t with �.�,a.:.. a P and receive approval appb��ant to prepare erosion control standards for the Tualatin River Basin 36 In order to ear►ply with 'Policy 43.1 the Ci, ty should add �ss the potential impact : of noise from the it' operation to the west, age 13 - Ileaar .ngs Officer decision S 113 91 -0012 (Rose M eddovve) a. Relying on the City policy and similar provisions in the 'Washington County Code, conditions are witted requiring the applicant to note on the face of the plat or in documents recoiled with the plat that the site is near an existing mineral and aggregate mining operation that can cause high noise levels and that the owners of property are required to execute an agreement not to remonstrate against that operation because of that noise. These conditions provide notice to potential third . party purchasers that they may be in a high noise area Such notice can apt appropriate inquanes and home design changes, whether or not the City requires building construction measures to mitigation potential high noise levels. b. The issue remains whether the Hearings Officer should impose structural • ease noise effects or delegate authority to the City Building Official significant requirements on homes in the subdivision to minimize the potential for gnu g aty. City Building t ®d ®so. The Washington County Building Official imposes wall and window construction standards for homes in ch unistances like those in this case. It is not clear under what authority the Building Official does so. c City Policy 4.3.1 does not direct the City to impose structural regiments. It directs the City to regulate building placement and to use landscaping and other techniques to lessen noise immpacts. It does not say what other techniques should be used or when y imposing i sin conditions described in paragraph 3.a above, the City empowers future purchasers to make their own decisions about effects of building materials on noise. By imposing a condition requiring use of certain building techniques, such as 2 -inch by 6-inch walls with R -21 insulation and triple pane windows, the Ci ty preempts th e prospective purchaser. d. In City the absence of a clear Ci policy or regulation in this matter, and given the conditions described in paragraph 3.1 above, the Hearings Officer concludes the subdivision complies with Policy 4 +3.1 without requiring homes in the subdivision to incorporate certain building prances. 4. applicant will subdivision extend complies with Policies 7.1.2, 73.1, and 7.4.4, because the site. In addition, the pphcant will show that existing sewer and water ways systems to adequate to accommodate MUM drainage y � fmm the site and will not adversely affect downstream properties. The applicant will also provide underground utilities. Detailed public facility improvement plans need to be prepared and approved. subdivision complies with Policy 8.1.1 and 8:1:3, because the internal street system and road fronta es will be roved to City standards and because the applicant plicant y g ... � PP will make off -site improvements to Fern and Walnut Streets, condition could be author ° pursulit to Policy 8.1:3 to require the applicant to build a sidewalk along Walnut 6 A tic; is construed to consider thxten the site to 135th Avenue, assuming the g policy _. y the de ��iopment's impacts off the site T�4 4 However, Hearings does not constitute a significant adverse effect onpbl c health and safety, sidewalk because of whe relatively short length of the under-improved the r . , g improv'el street section, a relatrveiy low volume of traffic on Walnut Street, and the level of improvements on that street. See also finding V.A.8. Page - Hearings Officer iIters u n SUB 910012 rPo a Meado • C. Other. 1. The applicant should remove the underground tanks, based on Uniform Foe e Code Section 79.115, because the tanks have not been used for more than 1 year, based on the testimony. The subdi vision will comply with the applicable provisions of the Bull Mountain Community Plan based onfindingV.B3a *rte SITE van. BY HEARINGS OFFICER The Hearings Officer visited the site and area alsat could be affected by the �., ►sed subdivision. VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION The Hearings Officer concludes that the proposed subdivision will promote the general welfare of the City, and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding land uses, pravided development that occurs after this decision complies wi b. The applicant shall dedicate a minimum 50-foot right of way for Walnut Street and Rose Meadow Lane. The applicant also shall grant to the City a 1 -foot reserve strip at the west terminus of Walnut Street, The applicant shall make faBiwidth street improvements for the internal streets, including traffic control devices, mailbox clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, street lights, and underground utilities. improvements shall be designed and built to local street standards. c. The applicant shall dedicate right of way deemed necessary by the City Engineer for pavement, curb and sidewalk to safely accommodate 2 -way rra c for the street between Walnut Street and the north edge of the site. The applicant also shall grant to the City a 1 -foot reserve strip at the west edge and north terminus of the street. The applicant shall build that street to standards established by the City Engineer and shall provide a minimum 6 -foot high fence along the west edge of the road and a barricade as directed by the City Engineer at the north terminus. d. The applicant shall establish a minimum 30-foot wide access tact for the proposed private street, and improve that street to loci suet standards with a . between curbs with a continuous minimum 5-foot wide siclewaiik along at�l � one side of the street, g (1) The fat ' the plat shaill identify the street as privately owned and maintainee r ; identify the lots that are served by that street. The street shall. serve lots 6 through 10 and eitier.lot 5 or lot 11 (2) The applicant shall install a sign or signs to prohibit parking so that a minimum 20-foot wide fire line is tected on east-west portion of the street. The applicant also shall install a sign at the intersection of Arose Meadow Lane and the private street stating that the street is private and not the maintenance and policing responsibility of the City of Tigard. pp office . of the Washington County Recorder w� with the deeds to lots served by the vate street a join use and maintenance Y J agreement (4) Before a `,wilding permit is issued for lots served by the private street, the street sh 1J be built or a satisfactory monetary performance assurance shall be provided e. ... . g .. calculations for and The applicant shall submit storm drainage details, including calf a topographic ap of the storm drainage basin. Calculations shall be based on lull development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of a dsnng, proposed, and future lines shall be noted. The applicant shall show that storm water runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageway without significantly impacting properties downstream. (1) Private storm - drains shall provided as proposal for lots ly 2, 10, and d 2f through 8 or as satisfactory the Building b�. visnon if the co�g tra�om of lots changes on the final plat. em enshall be provided Where soriii diatins cross other lots. Page 1 - 'leaking 4f ccr decidimi SUB 91 -4012 (Ruse Meadows) • 2 The applicant m ucess and maintenance � ce ag�ementm the o� �f �ashin gton County with the deeds to lots served by private storm drains. Owners of lots served by the private storm duns shall have an equal right to use and an obligation to operate and maintain the private storm grains within private or public; drainage eassements, (3) Private storm drains shall discharge to the public street drainage system or to other point aped by the City-Engineer. 1,4) The applicant shall execute and file in the office of the Washington County Recorder a maintenance and access agreement for all stomi drain otttfeils. The agreement shall be refereneed on and ran with the title to applicable lots. The agreement form shall be approved by the Englneenng .,Department before it is filed_ Contact Brad Roast, 3t' i g rv,sion 63941.71 ) (5) Rain drains shall discharge to an approved system. f. The applicant shall submit a grading plan showing existing and proposed contours and typical finished floor elevations on ea c i lot, including elevations at 4 different coroners of the floor plant tied to the top of the curb elevations as shown on the public improvement plans. g. The applicant shall submit and receive approval of an evasion control plan. .The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance c H.,andbook," November, 1989. h. The applicant shall locate driveway cuts at least 30 feet from intersection right of way "runes and at least 5 feet nom property lines,, 2. The applicant shall make an appointment for a pre - construction meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of the plans but prier to starting anny work on the site The applicant, applicant's engineer, and contractor `hall attend this meeting before receiving approved planets. 3. All to h ll be to a maximum slo pe of 21 or a report .shall be Submitted by an engineer certifying stability of a steeper slope„ including foundation exeavadon and fill slope Contact Brad Roast, Building Divi n (639 -471). reports to the ._ i „o.. 4 The a lican sha11 submit soil compaction � Building Division for p P all fills before building permit issuance. Contact Brad Roast, Building Division (639- 4171). 5. ..... Pp p s� connecting any existing home to the pn%ic seer system. Contact Brad Roast, Division (639 - 4171). 6. The final plat shall provide for creation of not more than 2' bits. All lots shall be fully ed comply with the dimensional standards of the R-7 7 zone, and leave at least 25 feet of stmt frontage. At least 11 proposed lots shall r'rnply with the basic solar access standard for new development. Lots 18 and 1 °, LO an 21, and 27 and 28 shall be reoriented with a long north -south dimension to comply with this condittion. Contact Jerry Offer, Planni ig Division (639 - 4171). Page 17 - 11 wings fflc fr derision SUB 914012 (Rose Meadow rt- „ 'ale applicant shall obta. a sign permit before erecting any' Si,. The sign comply with the COnmun#ty l e opmen t Code with regard slE� to size and including vision clearance at .Toad intersections. , Contact Victor Monti, ;mmHg DifaisiiOn (6394171). or gtadin a • 1ming DivisiO ursaaad to ate �� ; .P elan. The h(& i s �o!�e a d ed tee 4 invent ,not g the location, on, caalp r d des of all bees larger ►� : ( inches di ter'taeasu d 4 feet: them* ode, 'The event ry shall note Which troeS are piop, ; scd to be removed., Those a shall be removed only w1 : necessary to oe s t stets, utilities, ` and r d a A coil of the tree xIAval peaMit A.** • r ... • i • • 7f'he Ply • • icant:to p for. art amens grading �, w the plains for g . available onbsa d� �1 t dal and nay applicant � � . h and tree prow no The air Planning Division uay p pt` tiwe me for trees to boretained on the site. °The Ow Engineer may vary sideway location (9417 preserve ea i ing mature tom. Cota►ee lerry O ferrg riciAying Divisi n je . Fite hydrAnt locations shall be coordinated 'swath and ant by the r l ; +rd Water tr t Cetittet Gene irchiil, Fire District #1 0026.2,01) 10. Bef approval of the final plat, the a pplicant shait4 11..Clatcle underground storage tanIr6 front the property Consistent wth the Uniform Fire Code. b. Modify the fado of the pit to prohibit ,ditett vehicular access to Vern street from lot 3 and whichever of lots 27 and 28 fronts Rose Men; ow' [Lee e. e rN o C oth i gfacemm. aeraithane Plant or n g adume nininng ts o a rc peration ed wiat th e canplas et t :hi t g h th e n osi e i is levels, and that the owners of are condition of ►ipproval of a. building fit to execute an property nt na of tra :,. g � • • y to against that operation because of that noise. (1 Submit a plan to the Building Division showing the location of all underground utilities private for the existing buildings,. If those utilities cross new poverty lines, then the applicant shall milt easements for those lines. RECORDED 'TfI[I� 1 MONTH VALID AY IF THE FINAL PLAT IS EFFECTIVE FECT VE DA'Z'E ilS DECISION, Page 11; He.a figs Officer deektion SCIJJ 01 -OO.1a1 ?Rave Me s) is 17th day o pteilber, 991; Ner Laity n .p SteAn `• . J.F. HARRIS 12$55 SW HAI 8t 11D TIGARD s OR 97223 PACE 'O MILLER 238 $.O SW MIDDLETON RD SHERWOOD ff OR 97140 CAL t4WLERY 12356 'SW 132ND ' TI RD, OR 97223 LARRY wesT4RivIA.Vi 13665 SW F L ' ST TIGA r OR 9 223 DONN:ELL S STEPHANIE WILLIAMS 13865 SW FIR Oa 37223 SC401 `USSa1.0t' 31291 RAYMOND \rSiCll:ed.'6 RD SCAPOOSS / OR 97056 � i` mo DUN CITY OF TIGARD, e1AGO CflORD: OREGON TO: Larry Westerman, CPO 4B FROM: J f f er, Development Review' , Planner DATE: Octo er 16 1991 SUBJEcTo Rose Meadows subdivision (2 1e SUB 91' -0012 Your Oc tober 9, 1991 letter rais: concerns with whether any . , between SSW 135th Avenue and the proposed Rase Meadows subdi�r�s., or are to be required. The improvements to Walnut Street pp w part of the final order for r, oval that are .�,•,.. �►�. sun 91 0012 do a ac conditia�ns of not state that any improvements to Walneat Stac =set are req ired e However, Note 2 of the preliminary plat ccmaits the :• . developer to overlay � &� street. Preliminary approval granted by Hearings Officer approves not ia y gu f the subdivision but also the plat notes, unless specifically modified , by the conditions of approval • The final oxder to page 14 tc# 5 notes gnat the applicant will. wake off-site Improvements to a:z Walnut Streets." " statement confirms that the d 1� I believe this Hearings Officer was accepting the applicant's camatitment to overly this street consistent with the plat note • V :weaver, the Hearings Officer considered and specifically denied the CPO and the neighbors' s request for additional off site street improveinents along walnut Street, including ng a sidewalk. Planning Division Therefore concludes that". an asphalt overlay of SW Walnut Street between SW 135th Avenue and the Hake Meadows subdivision is an implied conditiorA of approval of this Subdivision preliminary plat. o. I :.. would welcome comments fr -om those who are sent copies of th ts letter if they dig agree agree wish this, interpretation. co tr". • „ a c: Larry HPsteir HQ a in s Officer Paul miller, property owner /app licant Dui Jim Harris, Harris --a c onagle & Associates °J Chris Davies, Engineering Department File SUB 91 -0012 13125 SW Hcali Blvd., P.O. Bcx 23397; Tigard, C)regon 97223 (503 =41 i'� l�� •s ItrA October 1991 C° eP045 Bull Mountein - King city.. Tigard (` ° �L 51991 dm Larry Westerman, Secretary Trea ;ire � 16► 3 4 SW Fern Street " ., COMMUNITY DEVELOP fl T Tigard OR 97223 jetty (Pifer Tigare Planning Department 131Z SW Hall Blvd I4ard igt 97225 Dear Mr, , Offer:; " u I am wrong in regard to case number SlID 91 -0012. We had expected, that the decision 'rotild,be appealed, and> tic patedniaking,euar cencorna 1a�u �i�c duringtthe, appeal .. iirocess, Sin ve no appeal was filed, I am writing directly to raise one issue. EC ;EIVE c reading . M tic® a�f fRna.t a�rder, there.appeairs .#o 0 error inn the judgement, u, a,ir Te order conditions the developer to improve rove SW Fern Street , from d of the development to SW 135th Street, was recommended by Wash n , yny the • 4 t Ives imposed for i rovamerts to County, No such rega�A��,a1e�a � � . p Walnut Street between g y 1h ., a developer the subdivision and SW 15: We ��n the CPO are reed concerned that ► will not Ae any ruveme � y A nts to SW Walnut, lacking a legal requgr ®irent to do so, 1 hope that either our understanding of the order is deficient, or that 5o e othec� 'sm exists to require the described ct mechanism �:. ffj110 improvements. In any event, hope that this matter can be settled in the best interests of all concerned. Thank you very much for your time and attention, Yours trull , Larry We , termaaa 4 District 48 Kenneth Creason PD. Bar, 200 Beaverton, Oregon 97075 -0200 birector of Maintenance 503/591,4310 , and Trahsportation Di `k Bewersdorff City of Tigard Planning Department PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 7223 RE: RISE MEADOWS PROPOSED STLI'BDIVISTOVI Dear Dick, The Beaverton School Distr ict Transportation offi has conducted d uc t ed a fuxther review oi the Rope Meadows proposod rub d ivisior regarding scho01 bus traxsPortataWri for children in this aread if necessary, to insure, the safety of school Ohildren, the school bus could loop through the neighborhood on walnut Street, Rose Meadow Lane, _ and Fern !;street. In summary, the School District has no further concerns about this proposed s'! bdivi .ion. treason • rj 10: 41 FAX #: 1 v+TWA) FROM: C.. FAX #: PHONE #: ¥(1 / DATE: /41 99 NCB PAGES `,,F -0 : -. ice INfii.I.11 � 'fA <1 THIS PAGE« 1 3665 SW Fern Street Tigard OR 97223 26 August 1991 Hem ~pegs Officer City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard OR 97223 To the Hearings Officer: I am writing with regard to Subdivision SUB 91 -0012 Miller. The emineering plat submitted by Harris-McMonagle Associates Inc., dated 7-8-91, denotes e sanitary sewer line extending through the right-of-way of the proposed SW Rose Meadow Lane, ,t right-of-way of SW ,o the center of the r�ht Fern Street, and east to the eastern border of the subdivision, 1 believe that the developer should also be required to extend this sanitary to the 'westir border the sewer line along the Fern Street right-of-way, subdivision. They a are at least 5 properties west and uphill from this point aint + • M • Williams' '. i. which could attach to this sewer hie. The �° .,�,� the edge of t ,.. ... _.. ..: ... :.. .... (south � the west development) and the Lewis (south and west o� the de etopnent) will, be required to attach to this ' septic tanks fail. this se�rerr line n' anti when thew..... � , , Furthermore, Selyu Internation has acquired a property southwest of the A, Miller property (tax lot 1704) for the express purpose !a�° creating or maintaining ing a sewer right-of-way for the future development ' property south and west of the site Given that future development from t • at direction will require a sewer c onne pion through the Rose Meadows subdivision u� t es, it seems prudent and . • priate for Miller to provide for such a eventuality during construction of this development: Your Yours truly, Carte wester an EivEp $gyp o 199% e. 09/03x91 14:39 was 664 71g7 CITY OP T I GADS Q4®61 ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSM I SS I ON OK TRANSACTION # 13063 CONNECTION TEL 2287365 CONNECTION ID 03 START TIME 09/03 14:38 USAGE TIME 01' 14 PAGES 8.., 2 ( r irs lr� , d'',( r9 : 4.ce viii, ttrr a� k °,.. It" .. tl� ; , 1 i r �. dY �5. u r r ra .�.+a r i . t �,I' '�- i t i�P•}t 7:x jT . r, � '# �i:u� 4!i>r 3 N i �. 1.x'." F' -7 r J t � ft, cY, "tx�'W ¢x ,�an•yy �u� t ., -' 4P II � rf tt. M '/' a t•�!�i14�i1�,l, r« b,�i Y i':ir`� 'd C2'M�ra �I,a t ' , w I( r� d �` r i. 4 u 1 dr'r�«I •way' +1"A� uKl w .. „a r .ii. ,!d�., S4 r. ,%. wX •wi' .x r i• ra PPP: w. wr7v g +�, .i 'r r aieV e.n a : •F4` *y� +r.. tl` y .)1 ryry M ...t n "•r yg I{ a` fa u�PJ -. ' r` 1 " 1 p f . r -�:C �•: "Fr , 9 � j y i { � � r ;�� y':•; ., i , . �, k ` 4 '.S t r xr " 1 f i A . Mk a"µa iU' " yyyF �� "w Y� 4�.:. ' . M �"� p !'r� ` , p Y LC ri � (� i � �•' +.i�Y b L �� f �1t ` � aa .i� x � v ,ei%e( • G e �• r n� M"»�J'�� a ` ' • � 'r} u. � j Y 'i n '• ! 1' 74. J, 1.'0,4' , ITU 1 0 4' I :1 ! ® c . k `y 0.:'1+1 i:'!r1' •'r;�7 E. •� {,: 5, ?j' "i� �•��4� °'tiypYl .� {Cd :er'4'1Z�.y'a��a� hrA�g,� nl y ,R Is, , �.A x�'l+ l . y A j�S .. :i� A.y&I "ir ' H� SJa�y 'fit rp'j { ;� �f ".'r" '.:�.4 Tr 4.'.M• A.G *�. f )i'A !', k+i `•W Y,di N'tpti��. rFi y'{i� W j� V -'r'I t�` -M �' {^fir I st•P firq. •i� µ,'r r",r�, 7F,q ^I 1� t uPx ,w did #�k'• .i f.Al � «C. a�,• I • nY�' �L� °" Syr �+ ka� a C''' � � (,' '�tp D Bull Mountain, ling (Pity, Tigard 1 September > 1 ?fin Hearings 47fficer Oily of Tigard t3125 SW Hall Blvd. rigard OR 9 23 To the Hearings Officer ° - .. membership 1 writing �+i respect to Subdivision SUB 91 -0012 Mi[kr. Th a general nl m® of am met With the developer and the engineer regarding this z. p ; t proposal at our general meeting on 28 August 1991. We would like to enter the followtag comment and recommendation into the public record on this matter Testimony WM heard from neighbors in the area about the a ropowl improvements to SW Fern Street and SW Walnut Street in the vicinity of the eubdieision. Concerns were robed r• of school .' ° e from children usa��g SW Walnut to rral� about the safes Walnut d 135th. the bus stop and waiting for te�e►ction ®f SW r sus of the seating Was that the proposed improvements te SW Feat Street, The caisson � 'which include a half- street improvement along' he frontage of the development, and development, art adequate, •� ��, the south-east corner of the days �v id��t.,ng to 22 feel fr� SW I�ellhut Street, namely widening to 2� feet proposed improvement to S Htowever, the v � � � �� way inadequate from the east edge of the subdivision to the intersection with "5 r 13 th, .. e ith regirds to the safety of pedestrian traffic, partieula ly sa« hoof children in the morning and evening hourrs. A n otio Beatings ° n Wets anode and accepted to recommend to the �t�tis� �ngs affzcer of the City of Tigard, and to the Department of Land Use an4 Transportation of Washington County, . j o W Walnut f o Wide of 22 that the developer of this �ddtvisioaa be required to upgrade S e rn edge of the new development to the intersection with SW 13 , , . p ... . Sidewalk, . .. learly separated feet of pavement, plus � ` : or asphalt bumper, a 4 to � foot paved strip to be used a from the road suffice, for example by a curb, ditch, r p pe Thank you very keec h for your cone deration in this matter, We appreciate the p development review protest, opportunity 'ta pla�cx ate in the d�a� Yours truly, frk Larry 'Westerman Secretaac',; ; CP04B ROVED pLNNIN P03 ° 1, .�Q • - . • LEG. IBILITY STRIP Q • __ ' tt • . ' , ' RECEIVED PIANINNO SEP 0 3 1991 ,enoem OitYof Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard, Oregon Re: Miller subdivision west of SW 135th between SW Fern & vialnut St. AS an individual who has participated in the community process in land use planning for 25 years, these comments reflect this perspective. When a 28 house subdivision is to be built in a neighborhood where there are currently large suburban lots, substandard street with no sidewalks, traffic circulation which all funnels to SW 135th & wainut St S., which is dangerous and substandard ,and which will provide a"'new stx'eet stub to connect to the northorn currently developed property, to the current residents in this area this will be a ,AJO2 IMPACT. After reviorinp; this subdivision proposal with CPO #4 Bull Mtnso 1 feel more offsite conditions should be made on this development. The children will attend the Beaverton School District schools, and they all must walk on SW Walnut to SW 135th then to the corner of SW 135th & Walnut intersection to catch the bus. The Beaverton School District does not send be into this area. AS a conditional of a proval I _wouldrecora_________mp_nd and concur with the nei hborhood and CPO / I, Bull Mtn...2._ That SW Walnut beEEUtobrouh'L local street standard with a. Sidewalk „on one side from the subdivision easiLoEllaitlit_ AS a condition of approval of Seiyu subdivision farther South on SW 135th there will be sidevralks constructed on the west side of SW 135th from Seiyu development entrance north to intersection of SW 135th & Walnut. This is a safety issue and the TirV monies from this subdivision should apply to upgrading SW Walnut to separate pedestrians from cars. This subdivision i8 putting a roadnorth to undeveloped prOperty. This property is for sale and because of its advantages for development will subdiviSion be opened as traffic circulation when Property "to the north develops Subdivision be resuir-w t• . with the •ro0er wna 0 the West along this road to See if thiS ro ert owner w/ fesioa e rig P o -.may 0 a be developed in the near future. It is important that the road from miller do* full street iM rovement at t is ime. $O 1 i r sus lvlsion s ou s cond- ioned 0 lifIRYarr—FE17661"—nbrovemems so e a lo c ua 1 n IMOMMinalalg 111110=101Mmaisal • „, • • The neighborhood on Vern 8tree1s iS concerned aboUt a grove of tre near the entranoe on Fern and where the eidewalk alonO 41P61PA144 be Placed. evla t,t2xaml_haI osoula1 —±h tt It c:3ems tO Work ihatgth tr0 with the sidewalk. September,. , 1991 , • • 4- 0 . al, .. • ,,„ • • • " ■ • . , • •.• •, ...,.: •„„.,, 61,io..„...cir.11.00.•„„iti....6b.0,:i.4.,e0..,„.„...:,,sv,„:.,a5,...*.:41.40,blii,-tI„...„:,.Pil6,14',ii*ilii::::W:,,,'.,-.:,..',;.,' 10...,v*iy..„ :01jvitte' ',..th4t H. 'here,•, ii0:,..MUOTi:OW..-60ye......1004t':.:00u4n00w...:::::,..*04.'.:Hov...0.-............:,...4.:::::,..i, to....-00W0,-eHH:H•T11,0AitY••••,Or.Tj..,gad,ALW041(1.1rig.0h00141171-,..1110„.....:0..t'l(5got,'Hot,:r.,..." • • the, ,•'.b kio'..:V, it, '',o,i.:' •,:., 'bte....... ars.' ..:••••,iii.:... t*,e,4o,...,„'., 6.1.46,tir.4i4,..foii.-.4i.id,,,:,iiiii,;" ...,,,W,:bititi'd.'6'. ''",..,*',i*ii.e.giti..::,:'.':-.:,'.h.,'.•• .....r„).0w,....eveppmer.).,ttphg. =401....r,,.;:0114r0.0f,,..',.0t71".$.1tojteiprOV1A4Y:,:H.,„ -",'„,......,,H*,',....,',....'i'i',-,*A-, .. . . , .. , • • • .... ,: ,.„ .......„.„ .... • ... . . ,. ..... .„. . ••• :.• •• ,, • '..,:,.....i!...„':, .',„:,.....,:H,,,,,,„„...,..,...;„,,,:,..., ' ..,:,..-Y.0.r1V"...-";`,.,l":!..",p.0.vd,:e,,„ „,,„;:,:1,: ..„Q0.,•:.•,, ,,,....,...,:.; ,, ..„..,........: .,..., ,........„,......• • • ,...„....H.„...--.,..,..„,..........,i.„,:........ . .. . ......,.., . .....„ ,, L • votIA Atk•}t'" brand Fax Ransmittal ,� .. ::�� 1 � : n. taaPrvYCMI' W2 JN,.C+AIaIM.kW.il;ikRkJltlkwmPt •� / � �: ®l, 1 J , 767Z NOJ O }Page$ ? i b1 8yi9 [7e�ltD e»a m lir .uuu« ro+av'aa .a�+lJ�hJ r amlxi.0 ■ "� •1'Y l i .1. h 1 ^.w r ✓� 2'...1.1 1,, �Y t T� r t::JY,aY'at:Ct # .%i C.= ,W6R. r1•, :'rIC.4...JIM / k„ [, /ye �^'1 ,�/��Yt�J,,, 1 /� y) M 4Vq .Y._a:.MM.NA:��Irb%Itl:Agf..' Mitt .,C'...:Y:J..:�;r.11r 4fl AR'k:tl Ertl Yw ,��ly • 1 NIr I 11'IS wIMV.'rd cal....... 4.1.. kY. A/"Y - 1 �//�� aa 4.,J:1A:Y 1 n,.•' PJV:YshK t'?� "',J N tYJ:Ak'Ki4'! <A'.JI Co Y , yNj( mpany A %'iiY4t F5 x i14 A a YY MNNX4ba n 1 :1;hM :W 6 %I:I h k ;Iik : }M J p# . C 1 ,..Y . M �//jrp�..I�y Ji/a '.K�rv.Wq+M{tW,,,,, ,,,N•gj+ Fit d1 ,..11,14_.4,, Ra��r C�mpary' t?:tl. •G'. _i C.:, ,K tx4.t.. fCµ, /�/1 /� ♦ /� 4..`G4,.v }rrt„ 4Y1JAM'yH" "R'1MM';,,ir rv+ ry Location • L,c M. Y. M. t.'+ IJ...++ Y. 4"ti: XJ 1pl EfAp1 %YJR•A�:kCf'JW.'lf..k.M>1J.3 ' �/6 wnAJw41i (l KYrIY ik 4 rn::tilitM1Am 1 ^isH ..tliy 14tVA'kitY!`2" "A3 ,�1(��/1y�Ji(/)}�.�.�� .It4,.cY:+ {IgA.2�Yl ^•1 w AR, 4'�R' k.i4y„fa{.vat .4k.«. Ili _tt1Rt Location a,:2Y<SNq -J Y•. la,: K. 4' JVi. Y> p. �a' r> IFl GYE: Wrt4ll Mip. W.,: i'^ bIC .41MaYgph'Y�'RJYk'lhiAlMN+k:t1t a k e rl M1 ,YWJtt htn ,Dept, Charge twrete r � ,�„ .. �,.>r> y x �.f�;::..r.J�`_t,;a,r, Telephone # a.xef.lrne�- w•rwr�rtr,* <:aY„r.�1 ..7. � . _.,< „,.;.xY� ..� r,,~ n k M Y HAG f� � p FA.x n t•,.r.. r• _ ,•J .J�. x... Y, �, i ua�.Pl r� _, Ciia p;pq i°rtYh4'M1N A . W.,,1 ,..•. : yr,.�� 4.1 J.�..h..:: Telephone r Comments a•:x:::n:�.. 07 101 t.•:Ikf 0.. y • sra• nsw:.. ut .Jisyah:rx'v.,r>«Yrkrx.n.,.sar x.. s..x..x v rrr._.,:uxu...*r+m. Q✓' r'p Original m J, ., - u,.Pln.u. ;kiF aasr-2Y.,•ni:r� ,J� � -,4 r It Jn4ti.- „, Disposition. Destray Q Return O Cali for pithip �” '(.a c al r e r• u u a z:xsr•.rnc lnia �� .,Y , i.L. • Y. n �iA d l ...fA ..a��'.trRi.- L .:V. tR�4t:rt �Y.Mi.a.O'li.}+ �,,� 1 4 /p%, �� _a x for ` ut.: In nar: Y.I .Y.J:. , N.s':.lbt. .,t•AI Ktat•VtA:t; ,y'.1•�Y�klG ,.?1;14:3. 414144. 4;tK1:•.b"4"NVJCGYN_1119eCON'u. ' `I Tr. xy 1 IY ..��nn � uz,n..:..t u:;irs ".a. rr'tr,JC Li 2ryakAu�t ra'::: -J / b (('�•y /•�$�r(r Ti j a•T.' W ttY*.,..�.sxY4/ VIr $13,:4 ailJ QV1.41JN4fi'.aX 1 II J � I G ,/ k /y�) , y� :�: � r sv ccn � ,.n•I n rr: ��,.p�''J'�)I ' "'r •�Y /` /��/,��j [. i�.` //^ /� j)(n,Cr^J�'" 1�....e . ..vclR I � �s 09'04/91 08;17 ° 503 684 729 CITY OF TIGARD •__ _ � _ . [1.001 ACT I V 11'Y REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TRANSACTION ## 13076 CONNECTION TEL 2287366 CONNECTION ID G3 START T I M .. 09/04 08 _3, 6 USAGE T I 01° 02 PAGES "' ,/ 1 tElt)`lE T FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING AUG 281991 FROM Tigard Planning Department RE: 11_MIMYVXSTON SUB 91a 4;p^ 2 HILLER (NPO #3 . & #7) A request for Subdi t3iOn approximately 4.97 acre site i,a to ,28. al mircela :, ranging approval to divide a� aPF between approximately 5,000 and 12,630 square feet each. ZONE: R-7 .(Residential, 7 units /acre) LOCATION: 13735 SW Walnut .Street and 13725 SW Fern r 1500) Street (�... 251 �4�#D, t�uc, lot 400 & . 251 �dSO'' t�r�x �o�� 15 Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your From various de artme�nta and agencies and from other information supplied ailable . to our Staff, a report and recommendation Will be prepares information avails �° near futures. If yOu wish and a ' �siecleion Will be rendered on need �oa�r ,Comments � �n the n An. 9,, 3��„ �. Ycan �aa�► to cent on `this a plication, we y by cOm��e��►trn use the space provided below or attach a mo agate letter to return yeur:, If *ad are unable to cgl nd b the at9ve~ date please phone the staff contack noted bele* with yonav Oomments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matte, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tig,ird, OR 97223. ]PHONE: 630-4111. STAFF C ONTAd fi s erry Offer .- ; PLEASE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: CHECK THE We hY ,,ve reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it . Please contact of our office. 1-.." Please refer to the enclosed letter. 1 Writtein Comments: Name of Person commenting: Phone Number: ;.. blunt /SUR9 `,-l22 m 0101 41 BBA` E RTOF a.‘11OOL2 DISTRICT CITY/ COMM RESIDENTIAL IPPAcT STAT E` Nam a of Development. or. Developer ROSE MEADOWS Date AUGUST ` 27, 1991 Single-family 28 Multi -famiy (I) Available School Capacity (2) (3), Enrollment Impact of Prior Approved Developments (4.) Enrollment Impact of this Development (5) Potential School. Enrollment sum of columns 2 3 , 4) Elementary SEXTON MT. Intermediate si3GETIAND PARK High School BEA RTON 1000: 662 957 463 10.41 186" 71 Status of School acct UAU 2 1933 "For xg ti of columns ugh 5, see code on reverae side) Schools capacity not exceeded..' (Column 5 is less than column 1.) v _..._L 5 is greater than column 1.) However` ��;��r�� s =) available capacity exceeded. � +�r��:.� amore- facility s are sufficient to consider additional portable classrooms to acconunod projected er _,nll aret of prior - approved developments, a. td the impact of this proposed f: cie ;cy is. determin . 2.' by requirements uirements of Uniform Building Code and /or development. city/ county codes. School ( =s) available capacity exceeded. (Column 5 is..substantially greater than c,olumn r . Core facilities are insufficient to allow adding portables. This school impact statement is for the above indicate Signer? pment, and alid -for 120 days �cutive Director Facilities Planning & Constru Lion or additional information on Impact Statements, see Schedule A. LEGIBILfflf STRIP IMPACT STA CODE Column: I Available school capacity reflects the available capacity after adjustments for. Speci-n1 vacation program accommodations-. Column. 2 September' 30th enrollment does not include °students housed in special programs-. At the elementary level, kindergarten has been conputed at one -half . Column 3 - Enrollment Impact of previously approved devela nents- determined by School District :bowing formula with a factor of .8. (see Schr,cl District bouaing formula. below) Column Enrolbrient Impact of requested development---determined by . School District housing formula. Col umn 5 Potential School Enrollment--determined by -the stun o f columns 2, l and. 4- -and places developmental request in. -A, B, or C category, 5CHOOL DISTRICT ROUSING FORMULA Single- aFamil Dw elling .48 I-irs-first grade children, per dwelling .32 elementary' students per dwelling .14 intermediate students per dwelling .07 high school students per dwelling .53 total. school -age students per dwelling Multiple - Fame: Dwellings .07 elementary students_ per dwelling A.3 intermediate students per dWelling .02 high school students per. dwelling 12 total school -age students per dwelling {Sj Schedule A BEAVERTON S OOZ. DISTRICT CON S1D,ATiO, ALTERNATIVES TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE LEVELS OF SERVICE . of bonded indebtedness ; - Under ORS 328,245, the District may incur bonded debt not exceeding .013 percent of Val- ; [ or Amount o real market value] of all property in the District, when authorized by the electors of the District. The District has adequate bonding capacity under the statute to issue additional. �� voters of the '� � nil bonds. On June 25, 1�a91, the District approved a $54.9 meson capital measure bond. Additional student cavity will be provided due 'o the successful passage of this bond. • tise, of double shiftless extended school aeriods y or , rerounri school The report of the District's Student Housing and Facilities Utilization Task Force to the Superintendent dated J ^:nuary 17 1991, and the subsequent Superintendent's recommendation approved by the Board on February 25, 1991, proposed further investigation of double or triple shifting, extended school periods, and year-round school. Such options would involve major policy, program, and fiscal changes for the Distriet; After comparing and .. . g t..., ' preference evaluatin the various housing options, ons the Dist�ct s cui��ent was to seek additional bonding authority from the voterS. The )strict does not believe that at present the anon- bonding alternative s ar e viable responses to to the need for additional sc hool capacity generated bd by individual residential development applications. Dusina to underutilized facilities - The District presently has, no underutilized facilities t either nearby or throughout the District, to serve the additional enrollment projected by the proposed development. Extensive busing of students is also contrary to the District's policy of providing neighborb.00d schools. 1 .. - New facilities will be funded with the Construction of new facilities successful passage of the June 1991, $54.9 million bond. One elementary school and 24 additional classrooms are projected to be ready for oecupancy in September 1992, a middle school in September 1993, ...._ " a dd a hx g h school in September 1994. With the completion of the �g school, the will reconfigure the gra de levels and adjust �o y �eries . Portable classrooms - Based. cn - <. the � u. nib 77 a existing portable classrooms in portables '14992 aahod Near, and up tito 30 additional portalal s for the 1992-1993 � school year,. the Dlt ict believes p that, in may cases, the capaccity for Portable classroom ssiriace has been maximized. lain act fees m In the opinion n of tlbe . Diet rict's le gal C oun- s- l t r the Platelet does not have statutory authority to impose impact fees., fives s The District does not co Aid�1' �ogn'oinstions:�, of altgrin�+�„�,.�. _� combat onss , �...e , additional facilities . the above alternate bonds ac� �� ed h► construction t�� erss ""� as ro with the proceeds o b pp by §r : F� ' {din a xeq utte additional school capacity. to- BEAVERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT CFO and County ILlsidentiall inrixtet stattmants Noven q "per 5, 1990 (Revised A,;arch 11'; "19 '1) • (Itevi ed At gust 1991) • Background In orde r to eff e ctively develop a comprehensive and appropriate respoase . • , Washington County's to both the City of Beaverton and u�neorp+�rate�, asii regk �~ast for, Information a riin residential impact statements, the School District has identified the o�; guidelines affecting these e�a noes �`. 'rtes and County 1 d * Chapter 197 of Oregon Revised Statutes c ,eveloped in 1973 provides for the creation of the Land Coma aeration and Development Commission ( "LLCIhC) . Cities and counties are required to adopt comprehensive plans complying with the LCDC goels. Among the goals established by LCDC is Goal 11 which provides des that development shall be guided and supported by appropriate public facilities and services, The Land Use Board of Appeals (L1JBA) has held that the definition of public facilities by ties oriel services : required b Goal 11 includes schools. 2u • Under ORS 92.0440 cities and counties are required to o adop t standards for ap ai of ch may include requirements for facilitating adequate education In compliance vffith Goal 11 and ORS 92.044, Washington County has adopted Section 501 of the Washington County Commttnit r Development Code. The City of Beaverton has adopted Ordinance 2050 which provides for the adequacy of public facilities as part of their development code., document wlnc :... .. _. ,.�,. �tion on this ▪ The one docu>� h st�pphQd the 1R�a�t �.�. topic was wrltte': by Jtr mes Redden, then Attorney General. who rendered tai i. opinion on June 11, 1970, Which 611410 the intent of the T,' DC requirements relating to the approval of . .:,„ .. Mo planned .. ., ' f .. ....... � Of the eidegtut rr - � of subdivisions and the "burden of proof d existing or pl school .. i ., fec3iZtxes �,.� accooslnte anticipated increases in school enrollttent. • T he Land Use Board of f A I? decision Mardi, 3 i ii)8010, , the ,at of Beaverton vs Di gage, remanded a de .do b y the city of Beavertax o n the basis of there being inadequate evidence to rimport a determination that there are adequat e elemen'�wy ofacilities available to Seiiiiie the proposed s`itbdivie!ox m pa 5 . The city or county rovei nments are responsible by 'taw to make the decision on side .$.f & l developments. The School District is only one of se "retai .,,,,,,041%c entities that is asked for impact stgitements Beaverton School plairlat i F1 In tte context of thesi agezj ide�i es, the Beaverton School District prepared an i' apaet statement regarding g the projected student Impact a proposed development would have on School faeilities. 1. the Beaverton School District has a,! statutory obligation to enroll all students who come from within the'Distrlct's attendance boundaries. • Prior to February of 1990., the ,SchO i ; isteet's generic respons 3 to city /county Impact etattment requests was that student housing would be prci ded. fOr additional students generated by new developments 1990, the School ' Bathe • After Febr�aY �, board s stat,��tanex�t Fva�; District % s �aenty m ointed a Citizen's Committee ommittee to stud lon ran g a facility t y nee� 3 This cOmmittee tkagi recommenced a bond issue for the cOnsl,ruotion dad' new fa hies The School District will be able to eccom nodattai excess student enrollment generated by .. me�nts if they can acquire r� enerated b. ad+dl�.on�i de�relap , � needed. school sites and pass a bone. m seure i June of 190." • Following and failui w)f the aui1 .. of a +, �5 tQ311%n h - e 0 $98.3 Wilton bond in ond' subsequent failure' measw a in Se t mber 1990, the School aid. asked that city p and county development requests be tabldd until the Board could review its prior position • Can Monday . October 2 . gt , Cod aissionern, w - 9, �ashin on 'County �chooi Board held a >3eavertorx City Council) Ong rii�s� ��! on the �mc'� and ph.+�►tio�s oint work session of growth and the processing of residential developmental impact stateSients was shared The ;District a • � begun , on 99 r ` t + g impact statements wlAch reflect the Ip ac of prior approved developments within e Lased on the e enrollment l» art of prior approvals th par ity chschool, at and the projected enrollnnen'� pact of the regnest . each request 'receives . an A, , or stitus drool Board on i elb1 �'he . S r 180 v oted to enbirsa'tt 9.t ia�' 8 school - � � to'the. :�roter� �ns�ii��:t�si�iri bond i�e�u% Of $a�. the Distract. • • On June 25, 1994,, the otere approved a bona 6asu for $54.0 m1111,1116 eonstraot near schotl f'ad1lt:$esr. M1 lsftric t Patterns lhuent ri Over the decade of tine 198as,' school etilatAbaeuts throughout the Beaverton School Disthet bav : a greased' by More the t,i 4,509 ,�! `� ' these iriereciSes -q more than 3,' st .der s; st ieer�t� . The 1�� entered, our Bchools for,. the first time in a pe lod of the 3.. apt three years. Last year t tai ie 0 total school a nrollme it in the Beaverton School P str ct i icreased by 1, 6' new stud% ;ts. Actual ea rolletent, in grades K42 and in Special Education from the 1956 -g7 school year to the 1.990,491 school year follows 1561 1716 ' ' 1786 1831 19 1 . 1730 19 3' 2019 2011 1599 1721 1M 1 4 1471 16435 1745 Y , 1525 15.7,E 1716 *900 1 14.93 1578 1588 1775 1959 6 1602 1535 16,E 1685 19964 1569 1633 1625 1 "t,' i 1866 1574 16a 1676 1694 1 1645 1 9 1622 1697 1756 10 1fl .731 1644 1V25 1 � 7 11 1851 1705, , 1753 163 , 14;' 1 1745 178 11669 1681 i Sp 2 3 390 Ed .: 3!x,1 ��i- n 21113 21913 22/ 23588 24926 Enrollment Projection The Beaverton Sihtho ri District ! enrollment rgrOwth will most likely continue riuring t%* decade of the 1990s. 2nroilmeft projections through the 19;99 -2000 sdhaol year suggest that the Beaverton Soho® Il atrict ' will exceed 290200 students, 'rrpresent4rg .en increase of More than 40000 new studeAts . over the 1990 81 ehaci: ; za .. s actual enrol Merit . A W . �xnroli�ent projections . pr Spar oil January 9,' 1990, by the Center � for Population Research and census, for the 1991 -92 through ton 1999 -2000 school year are showy o .), the following chart. 1369 1335 1875 1895, 1948 19 `7 . 1369 1899 1885 e. 1981 2048 2 `1' 2055 7,039 219 20 ; 2085 2110 2 2055 2059 2071 2051 203b 2004 1: 2019 2066 3' 2123 2115 2111 2114 2'16 263 2043 2032 2045 4 2139 2191 2/74 2160 \ 2153 '2125 2102 2082 2061. 5 2052 2215 2257 2229' 2204 2197 2169 2146 2115 6 2089 2122 2275 2306 2268 2243 257 2208 2176 7 1982 2192 2217 2365+ 2388 21,49 2324 2317 M9 1882 204d 2248 2264 2402 9425 2361 2345 � ..: .... 2361. 1891 2265 2�7a 2409 294 1�1� 2075 ,. �... � 10 1843 1972 1993 .21 2 l 237 .2416 •2499 2453 11 1837 17 .. 873 ' 1993 Z!0i35 214T '2330 2 X75 _ 234 12 1709 1759 1790 109°' 1907 .4 2221 7' } Ed 398 409 439 440 442 2 4711 'aG1�lL 25917 26825 27571 23164 230`'13 29153 ; 29 '8 29299 W. Student Housing cud natty Utilization A. Historic:2d Framework Snrce its formation in Augt\st 1960, the Beaverton School District has experienced periods eriods of student enrollezent growth and student enrollment decline. During this tine, the District took appropriate steps to address these enrollment cycles, and to respond to student housing needs and facility utilization requirements, Residents of the Beaverton community supported therie actions through their approval of bond measures designed to expand student housing capacity. Between 1979 and 1988, the Beaverton School District took futrther e t nt cycles Eey actions arela��d, steps to respond, to student enroll�ie include. Closure of Sunset Valley Elementary School (1979), Garden Home Blementt School (1082), and Cedar Fills Elementary School (1983), and the sale of these three schools and two additional open land properties, el (f School Mere Davies Elementa ry School (1983) om"active use" to "auxiliary use" status. an additional 44 portable classrooms on school sites shout the Beaverton School District from 1987 -88 to dl. Passage of a $13,8 million bond meaaire in March of 1988, combined with revenue generated by earlier March Sexton y � � a�►erty sales, School and 81 additional classrooms essentially in rapidly the construction of Sexton Mountain Elementary .t .: growing .western portion of the School Dist$ct. Recent foa. xn l 989, the School Board, co mi 3Isioned. a 30- meFC.xber •citizen LQng- Range ` F, �eility Planning Committee to study and analyze the facility needs of the Beaverton School District. Their work re u ted in an ultimate recommendation to the School Board on March 20, 1990 This recommendation on Wa reviewed , nd sad validated by Many conga tnity omamendata. .. _ .. _ +v � The groups way of hearin {, fo:' us group1, and surveys. �.he . e d electi of c 98,3 �million. rThis bond would have fina ed the facility ter needs of '. the School District through the 1964,95 School year. The bond enure was unsuccessful. Th e Board was ur g ed by many ... community groups to ma up w e ... bond t a reduced the voters tern trimming nearly', $25 m o , It was ha i�' n .. .,, September TMs bond submitted i v � r of :990 Measure was also uisuiceessful. Both of these bond issues would D� a have provided two elementary schools, a middle school, a high school, and expansion of most current secondary schools. On September 24,, 1990, the Superintendent appointed a comittee of citizens and staff to review and discuss and, ultimately, recommend g . ,,,� 'school District to him a plan for housing students in the Beaverton r,� for the year ' 991 -92, and also for the )ear 1992 and beyond. `I`his, 40-member task force bean' its work by reviewing a syllabus of more than 60 potential student housing and facilities utilization options On January 17, the 40-member Student o the Superintendent. ties . _199, th - Fa Utilization Committee made its recommendation �afrom was the School District The primary recommendation from this group submit a bond issue to finance new capital construction. . Cent .Effoi On February' 25 1991, the Board voted to subm n a bond issue for $54.9 millio n. The bond issue came before the voters in June of 1991. It was successful and will provide one elementary school and 24 additional elementary classVroms projected to be ready for occupancy in September 1992, a middle school in September 1993, and `g .h . completion � . of the high a high school in September 1994. With the school, the District will reconfigure the grade levels and adjust boundaries District �, total to 109 portables Dist�e 1991-92 h r�hic site bring portable classrooms for rldfiwide. The District wall s school year � � . District S all A. iditscion Statement On October 24, 1999, the Beaverton School Board adopted a District mission statement which established. that "It a mission of verton School District 48J to meet the educational needs of each student in its schools and to provide a queht�.r education which p ... er ome a productive member of the spares ei�ch'�t�,ndeint.to bed: community. ▪ Neighborhood Schools on nforsed its long- standing On August 28, .1999, the Beaverton School �+�ard. r�►$ commitment to maintain neighborhood schools, knerng that preserving a seance of Identity and rientii'�cation tla► a particular school is a strung community Caine Scheid Site The Beaverton School Board also aafffrme wo x! u and 9 s$ , that st 28- 1989 TDistra�:d. elea eniCax�y schools serve he 44 an dents l interitediate eehOOis 'w sere between 900 aund 1000 Students' and, sera r high e, cho' is will se e et*een 1 6a0end '2000 sbud9nts • Con Facilities On October 24, 1988, the School :board adopted a series of long range gn District's sign planning goals designed to support the Dist �. � � mia� atemen . A old related to physical, resources Sates "to plan, build, and maintain the physical surroundings of students acid employees so that the physical environment supports produce lye study and work behaviors . °' • Class On April 10, 1989, the Beaverton School Board adopted a policy addressing class size. In part, this policy states, "The Beaverton School District believes class size to .be an Important variable for ensuring student success. The number of students assigned to a .I?a,c 1alar Wiese will vary �t matter, and facilities. also the numbs student S�n rela�txonshfp to such factors as a�tt�, chars ctexnstics , oubje ., , number of ►tudents assigned to a class and /or the total assigned to a teacher affects the extent and quality of individual student contacts, teaching strategies, instructional content, and coununication a In addition to teaching $ � t. ,�a. contribute to h,�ng effectiveness, class size �� also. con teacher rea r'�uitmert, more -,e, and ra .int.. " Current standards applied to this framework for w establish a � nt contractual Stan ar assessing these values at�thea l ctenta: y s o �el, and 2.82:1 as a similar standard in the District's secoudary schools • Portable Classes On March 10, 1980, the Beaverton >43chool Board adopted policy governing the status and use of portable classrooms. m This policy states: "The use of l:,ortable classrooms is a temporary rather than a permanent solution to schoei housing needs. At the time portable'class'ou as are assigned to a school location, more permanent solution such as boundary changes or a plan for new facilities should be determined or under consideration, Assignment of portable classrooms to at school Will depegd upon the number l . ,... ity at the school, projections of students enxoileal over caper the for growth in enrollment, and availability' . it Portable . � avaiie � � p continued gr .. ... classrooms be Portable c�assrooa�as ma else be a�ss�gned needs .� ... . needs . � ..ns# given first se and pilot . ede such as remodeling or ne.. o programs, Enrollment needs will be eve . Based on the number of emoting portable classroomS14 vac s 9199 portables for the 1991.-92 school year, and up to 30 additional portables for the 19929. 3 school year, the District bel eve9 twit, a many cases , the c.ap #in ty for portable hlo ci�ssroom . space ce ... has .. lee n m;ed 8 A. The City of Beaverton and unincorporated Washington , County are required to adopt standards for the approval of su'.divislons which include requirements for' fk '," tating adequate edw ation o Both the . City of Beaverton and w'as'h A. dngton County have, formulated these , s w ntandards re sQt "codes e The Beaverton School District is statutorily requ to enroll students who come to the District from wit in its attendance boundaries • The Beaverton. School Board has adopted policies design I to establish school capacity and facility utilitat .ion Standards,' The Beaverton School District has historleally taken. appropriate ''. steps to respond to cycles of `student errolinent 'growth and t stud .ant enrollment decline. in recent years, the Beaverton School Dist ct has addressed enrollment growth throuL'Ot school consttr Action activities and the placement of portable classrooms on selected stool sites. Bond measures intended to expend this capability were defeated in June 1990, and September 1990. enrollment growth led to the formulation of a student f housing' for • Continuing Y designed .. . and facilities utilization .stud dean � seas year year and in the 1992-93 school year and beyond. • Based on recommend -�° ata!aans from the Student Rousing and Vacili�e . and , Superintendent, the Board elected to Utilization Co�'�ittee andl the �� 04.9 milllion bond e for capital was' submit to the � l��u voters election took lactie June 25, construction. _ � a, 1991. , and const wilt Th successful. g:. �. � 24 emta or'eno ele�nen scac�ol� 2 additional classrooms at the el im f level, one' middle school, an d one high school Ova elementary sci'i of and 24 elementary cla srooms are projected to occu�a��cy September 1.9��2 , the Middle shoo In be ready for � � i Septem berg 1993, and. the . i � � w�tth *fie m�her 1��. � ... o the ` h school the District reconfigure t"edde corapfetlo� f � .. s levels and adjust bound aynes . The additional font s will. be sufficient to ec omamodate additional students , result ' g from new developments. 4 poaliii nrand Fax p /.I-Yj�, DaTransmiUal 767 S�•a=k N °rH�y,�i6 1 tNr0. °ti� T ��ia`eT, q • 1,t gte SI'71 . u+1ldl id+,,,,.Ai.P SSI„rlyt66" .. 41 , ) 11 jl 11 • 1 , 1, 711 61" !!1 4/44 ) •,1 11 {41 1 1 i•1�e • i 1 44 ;.... 14, ' 1 r1 " /+li 1141 61.14 ' it i 4.0 6,8 .rU.i •i. 41. i, N11 Illlll.11 li t r 6. , 161,1. ,r.Y ,M1 6 f i _ //�� m - .f.i.. ..- ... � f l i.... 1! 11 4. r.• + ,,.,..� i �.., 14, 1 1 1 . , _ IL , �CM ,1116 111.61{/.1,{ Ijr /6 ,l f Cornpany (company �� I '�` C� � , C t' 111 l rl, 211911.100.41/1170",),. 1 H " i 'll { X1.7 U,) ql LQ,.ei♦n rr�� , 1I r ,6. , 1. l . I l I �y■ �yy !'i��Ya�{.pl 1 +l 1 1 Y 614 Illy Irl 11%/. 1H71 Vi/ 1. .1 , , 66'411 6„ 1.! .1 . , 61. 16, 16 it 6 . ri ,., 6 ', 12555 WYW. 0 I * • il� i I 6 I, ilrl 1 1 11 I• 1 ! llli ! , + 61' 116 l,l 1!y li h.y J,•. 6{ 1 lr iil .l) .N ll) �.1 Ir .rl 11 l i , pp. .. ..i.. .. t1 Fah ..t �Yy ` CZi Yoio 77C'.�117 i IFahiF Li / ®�i 1�d 1, r r r.1 +i r 1.1 Ifll 6611 E 1 . r, "� i4 A. ,11 4 • I 444 114 ,16 i . • , ii 1 r 11,1 rl 16 i f .1.1.41 1 \4o1Y �4 / /1.111.. {llr Y •. 6 .I 1 1 Comments .,. ; C^ksiginai �.+! ii 4 1 + ls!Il ''.,�A, ,i,.. 14. r!, 1i. llf +466 ,6 .111 4 i.M (1N711. �j,y�1 ,. �f ��r l'•�""'p • V '1i4� • ", , 4 Ilr 1 04 /. , r:. 111,x. j �,.... y l V.l�r r' 61 .i ..,111., 6 111' .." . r.,. �, V ^' r — �• {a' { ..11•..1 .. N 11+3 . .11 ! l 1 . 6. 1, 1 'li 1 +r -go,' 1 i t,,, 111 I4 . IY li ,l .I. 41,1 I{ /l 14 11 11 ,I 1114H1'lift �p�,y P I 141 rl 11 ■ ' 111 iitiHi 6161 ..1+) .. 11 I+I i11+11141f1,1.1.. f .4/4, di .41 1116 11! ..OiIA 4 4 , 66 " i� r i 1, 4 I. i ll 111 161) ir,1 i ii Ill ,ill llr i1 4 ! .44. 4 11 1 '1414 1 1 4 1 1,11 111 H.4144404, 647 + 1 4 41 HI 6664146 1141 .k.1411 Ii.l •irt 111 ill 1i1166r11 • . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 ■ ...M," ..1 li ♦31 4 I i,l .e it iii' .N! 1.4 171,{711 t11.l + +II Y)1 414 t. 3/1/93 Construction plans submitted to.,city 3/23/93 Revisal layout, construction plans plans re-submitted to City. 4/1193 Construction plan redlines back from Cif. 5/27/93 Final Plat submitted to City. — 6/24/93 Final Plat submitted to City, for final review 7/16/93 Consttuction plans submitted to City. 8/27 %3 Construction plan redlines back ack from 9/29/93 Constructio � n plans submitted to City 2/9/94 Construction plan rediines back from City. Mc-17) rvib i . A to F ,.9°` ";! E. 7- , r + i'` „ 44 far a A:31 1 s i' N '',„ + ,iii " p T 'ci 6'440 09 01 311011 1 011221 —'S o 9 3.iI.I *6 ' A:J.ENii{,i I A DUM CITY OF TIGAVDD OREG014 TO: Larry Epstein, Hearings Officer FROM: Jar Off for Associate Planner DATE: SUBJECT: Mineral and Aggregate Impact Overlay Zone Requirements additional information. regarding how You requested that I obtain g the Mineral and Aggregate Overlay County administers district - District B applied to properties in the vicinity of the proposed Rose Meadows subdivision (SUB 91 -12). I contacted Phil IealyI Associate Planner for Washington County, for this information. 1r '.. . 'Healy stated the C ounty Planning D epartment conducts a Type a view of all development applications for noise sensitive us es permitted in the p rimary zoning district that otherwise would have reviewed e through process. This includes the review of site plans for s i ngle f amily • g permits. permitted through residential butxFldin ermits . All uses a Type II procedure rocedure are continued to be reviewed through the • permitted through a Pie III process are �ypellprocessar�dusespe�° process ° . . . reviewed through a Type III r site is within Distri,ot • oce�s �.f the sit R of the overlay district (See Washington County Development Code Sections 379 -10 and 11. t _- the review of a development The s ..andards applied to t ° Section 37914 of the District B are contained in Section proposal within D,i.�tr" e pretty y' general with County s�,�de. The s‘andar�d�� are oise reducta.on � a at L l.cas�t ePla�x regard 'co building placement and noise different than are noted in City of Tigard Comprehensive . ua la s Policy 4.3.1. Mr. Healy reports that the County typically thicker walls with additional insulation and triple pane windows on single family :residence within District B, at least for walls oriented towards the primary noise source unless: adequately by vegetation, fences, p These measures fall. V A es; 01. slope. e the Code and are s buffered the noise reduction measures provisions of �. r, sible under the Uniform Buildin Code. c County does not • et, ial ldin code requirements permissible the g have any �., � .. ..... construction within n �' g �o�e ��p nts� District 8. I am unclear as to whether your decision on the Rose �v Meadows subdivision proposal could create such a discretionary rev iew process that :is not directed by t he City's Develo pment Cod e, but I see no reasOn why the dec is ion Could not require specific bull .ing techniques h : _.�...p with iiinitnnf o! 2 ,� � � _ .. . .. s��cl��. as triple with pane insulation, at by ..LL construction �e , the err to tih�el.caSt for walls 6 exterior' ing wall unary noise sour gta west. I have discussed ;,. a- b I f ac � these building .. . a possible application ®f tar esuwith the City °s Building Official; Brad ,Roast` Brad teef�n�:a�a Y' August 2f1 1991 4 :1001 RECEPT I ON OK TRANSACTION * 12917 CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION Irk 03 START TIME 08027 1O: 39 USAGE TIME 10' 45 IPAOEs 19 IL EJ not foresee adnu.n►istrative probie i e these adl:4i,ti.onal techniques grade An se ',however teahni4ues, ,would reault aeasur 1e' reduction' in of tou emariet ng fro!u :the"' ' 0#y, although ! these techniques would certainly contribute to the thermal - dfficienc: of the �'hontes the County also requires property owners to execute,' and record ':,a, waiver •of re manatrance that :the' occupant ' of et •property w ll not object, `.to mineral snot segregate ..extraction and H. ,processing sae iver *list be executed prior td t i erne. wat � one �.sas an e_ � ,. . r��stl.+v�thos�s as �r��rh�eo ��r in �ls�ta�+�t � �� c►f ul.la�_n� vitas. A copy" ,oaf the ,waiver agreenent is attached. I sad 'eoo�, end that s qch „ , waiver, be required prior to recording. the , f net plat for se,.Meadows.. include t as On, s ti gt COunty b requires that the 'subdivision n plat i a�rot' ;� and are subject to the County ,neraA and aggregate the lots are ,wit n tai j y Code . requirements noted a vv Such a notation could be required iro ±,, the final plat for Rose Meadows, except that it should relatl to any building construction techniaues required as ;a Conditipn of approval of the subdivision*, plat or to e. special review process if required. Pleaee contact me if you need further information. TO 5 884'14 ? 9? AUK 7 r i9e1 10143.A 6 77 . P.0 VeASH I HOTON cOONIV Liao L E AND TRANSPORTATION 1b5 NORTH FIRST AVENUE HILLSBORO, ORt4ON 9112 4 FAX NUMBER 1 80$- 0393.4412 Total nuMber of pages (including coVe14) t If all pages do not arrive in legible form, please contact r2cept1 ohl st tt (6o3) 64g -8)$1. .x. f� forth ir�►�a�.��;�... , . Oepartm+�nt si d Tr (fiPort��tli t 1dmIr� ;i�i►o Pfi het¢ f mon W1,ItI tpo om ua q $ 4 4u0onocIP p04*0440 a duo* aleaLcr f A1Vi l 31 11931 V /1VI 1IW 43AIVM IS3 )JQJ /WUVJ AO eNYQ I0 !3!i uotsa4® sswalos wouldoteAaa put" uO1.40 J. pul luawssossy 4uoI S M1G spJO t,J 1- htUr1∎L -ll r0; 503 6e34 7297 PUG 27. i 91 10142. M u6 Y? 0 i1A1VIN4 tIfi11T OF 101011eTNANCE 0 This Agreement and Waiver is entered into this ,, day of ..�.. ..,.. . . if,.«, ;3 "this !'h ersigned, being the legal owner(e) of reel property hereinafter descried, do Oregon, ret The Ag eament anad Waiver 1s for the benifit of the parties hereto and Washington Co e hdreby egret as follows: Iii t the undersigned will not object to mineral end aggregate 'eeourae extraction end processing Activities es provided for in District A in Rile vicinity of the reel property hereinafter described, to the extent that kit ueei are allowed by Washington Coufity'e Land.i'e laws. This Agreement and Waiver is in consideration o�ti in the Mineral 1Ugregate Overlay !'slat" rict d . .°". —... ' t� Rural/ Natural 11666:0466 - F1d element ems. d the Community nee linens of Was hytt t fe401red , the Rural /Natural way Rel44ing to Land Use. Development r this Agreement and Waiver shall be construed Ue a consent to mineral end aggregete resource extractibii d Protesting activities Within the vicinity of the hereinafter described property to the extent that said el are allowed by lleshln®to Coon Wo Land Use lows, including any applicable dimensional act uen qulrements. The property subject to this Waiver of Remonstrance is deocrribed as Map Noe , Ten tot ,,,; and is more particularly described as P.0 This Agreement and Waiver shall in no way liMit, restrict or pretlernpt, the authority of Naohinptoh aunty to c ercise any Of 10e teVernmento authority as regards the Subject site, it is herby intended that ae or!n ea Will n e bulei{ whirs the hereinSbove descr ibe d p rp er ®l Wall ee �nyoPthe afore��I'd' heirM eetnndA 4 r purchesere of the heriinaboVi described property end Shell NO with the title to the avid property. This Agreement and Ida4vor= ;hill ahalt otdbet,�9rnoVed Until this iim9Vbp ®11RrcoO anger WithingtOn the etiove'dettribsd gropert end oat'ft ;uUnty's lend Ott tali«. bOiiE A00 PAYED this ,dsy of ..sue, a�,,;w4 SLATE or QREOON ) county of lleshiniitan ) ss bt it RENitMhEREb that on this day of ,,s lgo before m,s the undeteignnria a' hottkry public in and for s®id County mute, parsontll $nswn to 1ALf., own the ine tohbe the �ldentidti thdlViduells)� de;s *'ue th shd situ emocti J:3 '�hli4 ii�mh�ilii� �t it idd'4ctit1.'roacd b iii i'nO6 4,xiwu.tts4 1 lea y oh voiunteriiy with foil knowledge of the tette and'cliCUd tenicct regerdifg the thi of'i iioterr Ilablie fir Ord en i CemOlSilen EeDiree w After recording Pleats eetorn to the Dore fltilie nt of Land fiat and Treni0Ortiti on i I PROMO-- ,ro: 503 6a4 ?297`' 'AUG 2 ?'0 1991 10 434AM , ' . 46 ?? P.04 379 MINERAL AND AGE REGAIh OVERLAY DISTRICT 379.1 I! '' .Juis a" 3/9 -1.1 The purpose of the Iiinerat gsnd Aggregate Overt #y t i to protect mineral an aggregate rescl rcot District � R for future use, to provide for the devolopment and utilization of reaodrees c+ . rontlY or oConoMit +�d• needed �'; requirements of I��d devel equi 4 eme ppme��t censiatent wit the r� _ �; oe ��tr��'�i��n state ide Goal 5 4nd to r egu ato esour. and processing act1Vities to balance their impact oh existing adSacent sand uses= 3/9-1 2 The intent c"f the Mineral and Aggregate Qverl a . District is to: A. Rrov i di for public awareness of existing and aggregate activities; potential mineral and extraction and procos 9 i Gd Establish clear and objective opi rationa standards for the txtractiol and processing Of mineral and aggregste rescurtest a S mpl i fy the ,r1!4vi sw and permit pr ccsse rogate reso!irce extraction and processing tctivitiest ,gear the reclamation O '� � e t f lands after mi ntral Aoq�i Dp ��.�� alQroOate resources extraction activities, ire c o lipl eted • a l a ce significant Aool 5 resources When evaluating led designating new mineral any aggregate a s; and . • Protect significant aggregate resoqrcos from neW onfli tin se real and A. iregate overlay ay Diio 79 ®�.l 1'�e i��na, .,,.9� , .. . _. � tries ��e11. consist of tfijo distinct of e� cents t Di ttr 1st A and �r 01ltrict '06 "" ,, c A" may 01111 1n the F0-10 s 7g- : � �i �� t �.. PCB AV-200 AF -lair AF-t, PR -t E, R -IND and IND Distracts ''iii sty ►,r > �• l i 1" to a iy Land Use District. �+�� Fa� � tr. �6�� 4 p 0 a'�1d1 n evisiad 11 g3 {t Ft tea. e. t1 a''` J PN. PROM: L- 5C,3 604 " Ur`2?. 1 70 - 3 ,9.. .., XCA'.Igl..� 379-3.1 Distoict ea tlitell3 and ,Aggregete Ovnri aY District A shall be. pp ie�1 to sites Op4�tt which extt.sctions i' prroe0��sing and stock i1in3 actiV1 es are �currentl under.takOn and tb sites mhich may 'be . identl fled for o *%ractioh, proces s l fg snd 414. ickni l i ng activities in the future • A District A site may consliAt of one.or more.ts* lots or portion(s) of single'tex 16ts. A District A dosi. natipt to be applied only to ;those ,printery Ll nd Use Districts ,i4entifled in Section $794 37t9 -.3.2 District 4 ' liinorsl ?nd, A gre *te OverY',sy iDistrict 9 sh 11 the applied to `proper i es or pprtl en$ of ro erties ,1. n ( feet at g .i edJ�tca�►t ��e or within One thaussnd 1 �� District A' sites except when District A sites ere' 1c steel in %ide of or,wiihin ene'hslf mile of the Re+ Tonal , Urban growth Doundat y, rin whihh crse District shot 1 sl t o include s11 these Within � , ', . � ar,ties deslgne'�e o i"pp as urban �lt�lier acne i�e`af mile of 1Dlstrict A site e,, �e t where the �eu�nt p has n0 Jerisdintion. The � e' tent And l scat i of of 0i strl ct B shall' be di rbotl , eM ..elan ,of district A depesr�de�at upon the e�c$lnt en 1 eta and shall be detr . ;�� nod ut the t� 1 ms t 01 stri ct A sit o is proposed and designateds 379.4 r�. j�.g,�✓ `�;.�01� ' + *,... Tiy., r � Pleb District .. . 9hierere1 end Aggregate er1 i m be a... pl i �i en. the Compra Dens i ve P1 eh Reps thr�o igh the 1 1 t 1 e' `a a i sl ati w 'p1 ann i ngr . p , � e plea hpdot+ roeess� the {�1/�I Q _ .. r ou .....h a 1 d i s1 sti ve l en map * endrent II Y!4 e��pr under the 00114100 set fortVr In the comprehensive F ` @work, Palen rind the critertig contained in Section 310, ,2 Notwithstanding the provisions of this Gode, en spp`9'icatioh for t f4ineral trod Aggvcgato.Overls .. . _ 'ive: ai*��t�iet desighetlon thr+�h��h o -Y�pp �V 1+��i�he�+r�erx plan enendment prows gay: bb initiated by n r contract percheuers or sethori2e4 agent o the ott c tteget logethtsheg of a ,pre 6t0 :District * tite end shall be based on the fo110w100 critirigt • Ae A tratidn 9 ' coatfo;'a3tn00 With tho app11 cab1 a po 11is end s tr ttrties 6f the 'comp pheht n* Fr r3rework A re i art f ray i o cert i i ld eo i r . elh 000 o f ► o 1I tort rig ' hulBbd 1183, PROM: L- : 503 691 7 it 9F . Auq 27 L9 JI i t % 44A 1 #67 ? P.'I ill -1U5 veri fyi n4 the . 104atiOnt type, quality q .antit Y of mineral ral and/or aggregate °os0urceS+i t The ual ity of the aggregate, resource shall m the fO l0Wing riini m requirements, (1) Abrasion M o��i4 $HTO T9E loss , of not more 1 211) than 30% by weights (2) Oregon, Air, Degradation Loss of net 'core COSH 20B) than 30% by weights and (3) SodiuM Sulphate Soundness Not more than (OSND Y .206 ) 1Vedg,by weight; A demo nstr atiO0 of con rmsfpe with the dimensional requiremoots in Section ;179 -13 1t r osed District A' is wthi or adjacent to an E U Proposed Or AF 2O land Use district, ubmittai of the following required findings if necessary* (1) The proposed use will nat. o aa) force a significant chah> n in ac opted f*rm or forest : practices on sun ounding 1 ends devoted to f rt or forest use; b (b) Sigr.ificantly increase the cost of forest es, on � r� o� for pr'a �t1� eu mending lends devoted to fa► or su g forest esoe demonstrate that these %n �►pp1 i giant ��y ese star trde for approves will be sat1SfieA ,,',a y thrpu� �i the imposition �of conditions. conditions so i 1po$ d shall clear and objectives r. , The a l i „ant h hs signori w i v r of" the i � ri .htpts t� maas °at a finst co r 1Y accePted farm or forest prec PN I ces; Ft District, the proposed use Sri l 1. of sigei fice�rt1Y i ncrei sa fire hazard d or s. $1,0oificentlY i.tcrqo $e mire suppregsion costs or i ocreese risks to fire suppres' 1b0 Ohirsoransil a re,. art i drif t i f: i ng all potor t i *l fiend O►epped co/If1ictinci f'1 ict n Ses inel Odi g fte410 and forest use$4 et it i/ ;1� FRAM o L D a ati 379 -5 EX2Mtkii Raguia iia : 31 .1 The following . mineral and aggregate related act 1 w i t 1 +� s addressed in OAR 632 30 -dig ere extmpb from the A O a 37P in th EFU and .�� except i rat1 scts of 3ra ors r l andownars �cl aimin any of Districts. n �� these exemptions may ha askad to estabi i sh the Validity of the exernptiOn by Providing a copy. of an motion certificate ficate by the Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. . Mining, quarr°yi��g$ crushingt s+ re ningg. or w;�sh1 g of extracted od materials used exclis1vl1y for the constr Oct1 on of access roads. To maintain nAthi this exemption, no more than f j e thousand . ( ) cubic y `� be removed dur1ng any Yards of materiel �Aa consecutive twei va (12) month eri . S odi c ousen .. ... d (6000) excavations greater than sla��t. square feet shall be. subject to the pieovl tii ens n1" So ion 410, Slopns and Grading. m. a..y; Aril condu!te i n tie g4 E��a ate or radlrig 'aperati o To rocess o farming or cemetery opprationv.: maintain this eXe:: �" 0 n 6,090 cubit �ien no More the Yards of material May be tilted for another 00r Pose during any,Period of twelve (12) donsecu lve months et 684 7297, G 2 , 0:44 iM .07 1'186 dwelltnq units, and significant natsre1 and cultural &ou °CR `a mow, If existing £ot,f'1wting uses are identiftgd, thy► applicant shall provide a Program bated upon the ecoi om c, s9cia1 cnvirrnMentea and energy oansegUences anaiys i s that will nimi ze any negative effects of the mineral en4 *99f ;gate . rosouvice. relitod autiVitiea on the identified ied codfl ictinj user . � report t from a`, certified geologist, engineer or hydrel og 1st ,exr 1 n i ng the Potential impact of er mineral and aggagete resources on grpundwa, supplies and .wells in the surrfaundl ng area Notice of Public Hearings ion a-..p1 icat1ons for Mineral and Aggregate Ovarl a,� y Designations shall be s ubjoct to tae requirements of Washington County Charter and state Law. The'b9undary of the sbiect property shall be hz probarty cfnta i nad in the p`i°opose; Q i sari A and W area rya dt 1 en o f i nura and ; aggVogat+u i�ateri t m h0 e'ds an4 bt t� b y wetcr# ' 0 AV so 11 /g' C • 3794. 503, 634 729? G,.. 7,; 1.99i 1 :4501 06'77 ; P. C Ceuety 014rrGndtactod ;,pul 6 :i1t to a os 1 t i s sol ender OR , 41. n to 4i b �aA � y tho ; ��i e ien of, , o State Ludt. 00 esite C+anstru ct an ►par t i ons i th i m oon approVOd ConstrUCtion' site. SprfaCa nini n , o 00 retions- w hiCh i iVO1V C 16es th en five thausrnd 0 to 40b1t411rds otal eietorirl �� :� �tc�� et 11 �tcr+� of in di s�prbar�Ce thy , . _ tr�o� �rO ,(32�� moth an Cees+ CUtiire roi�oad �ari�e� Y eriod 400 tee u,Sed ttrict1y o o t sti ptrpose$ Such OXtaVtt1ons in to . hae e ix hoOsand (6W,Ii) $4u4re feet tubject the ,pwoViiiene of $ecti0n 1� 0 410pos acrd , o Oreain9 gOl 4rttorY •oxcovatiOhs 'for o1ncral rind &ggreoatb y'esourtes with i0volfo, less than fiVe"thenc�an 00 )cubit C yards total meters al di St al r0 oic e of nroulwd mer ani� ar 1 ass t'na�n 1) , ; okCned tae vt1e$ whiCtr do not exp`ioretion aC�, Qqn cubic yards vied /oar 1 a0104 tor 1 +end» threshold critarl e et any one area oitt t anti 1 tare tots trot of f octed 00061 s c en e (1 rb far etch, ,oi ht . (8) reS ,prospeCte � 0ox ) ®r a t o y �� pr � V e �� afros, whi C r fi rst. Such expiorxterY. Cei�tians dil= n Olbr8 than s x.the4 and (6000) $gar feed ahel be swibjeCt to the provlsione of $actiob 41 , Sl opo$ and edi nU . erratiot4% CvnlUCtL'd withi ��cavution o n a road b., p , htrof 'WaY or other, ,uaserne!rt ,for tho .pt a erYYr pgrpoto of road d+ hst'rUCti0n, reCOfStrUC o tint0000toa lo—the � �� end �� 0 Districts, th. 0 . f 0 1l oW i n O i Oo rt) gooraotte relatgd e��l� it1O akkre$sod i n 0 g16: 200 o .. t frri do . previsions of $oction 379; p� ��1�� 00 AO A +A'idr o than 000 tt ousond (1,OOC� �e r; i ' Cuhi C font of materl aI or eC4v ation pr ep; to ry to 044100 of sOrf rC? erne of r' ?a aonah Otte. Tewaaintain %hi �i�`��t ® r they Si000 chi C yards ef m tt►1 y t a tilted', to eth�r ,R Urpa o ad ri nt4. eoy' period oft _ d . (12 ) totitt tcut1 Ve rioritilit ood hd rh001. ti ey ? rock of of Aojer "tine of 4 , � _+g., r.;` similar m q co Ji1 hod by i A &nt w! T :Or ter `� � ! ��' tb��rt'� y QroOoi� �y f 0►�" tenant i an° the 1 aiodo�rner u� pion �� r oto Uf rtconit.t : ` the t666e ry ,. 16gets raid aqd OkCeVliti 6 or e ntenenoa tag e b- ^ • • FROM: L-1) 03 6S4 7 a'? RUB, 27, 1991 j: d5AM 34677 III -188 grading ow rt6t i ons'", condlActed 10 the process of farming or .c meter ,ri. operations on -site road construction 014 other ono s i to con ttructi on or 4 nenss rface irophcts of t ndergroono mines. 79-6 i 1,LIALLE.4. thitL t 1! Uses Permitted t'#rough a %p0 I procedure in the Primary Land Use p._ �sensitive uses v sub ~. District �xcn � those uses defined $� noise �� . jest to the applicable d iic�►b1e standards as set forth in Article IV an section $79 -1 and $40 -14. gaus-11012"11141119"InitailirssilihmilalitittisPi The f'ol 1 oWi rig uses are permitted tteo subject to toy, applicable standards as set forth in Article IV a641 Sections 319 -13 and 379-14. `14. 3197 3794,1 37941.,2 Mining or quarrying operations for the uXtr i. -tion of rock cl air soil sand, gravel or other mineral The following uses when in conJUnction nd aggregate extraction oporatian n s:_ Croshifg, "Washing and screening aggrog*te materiaih; StilickPiling of minral and aggregate Materials grogato and tleartr products; with a mineral of mineral and An officeo shop or othar accessory st ucturs, used for .., .t he management and o mineral and aggrqgato extraction 'and p oces t n 9 e qolpnontI from o of products produ fr od frog a mineral end aggregate extraction and procos s i ng operation; detached y �. ..... a �erau{ actors, One c►e�t�ci`ied d�o111ng unit rr® be in y structures ler a and accussor caretaker or watchman Asphalt batch p1ant, except in the ErU and ai stricts; concrete batch Plant; Asphalt 'batch Plant t i e the tilt or A -2 AF 20 Districts' except whin o�catod with1 two ( ) mi 1 os 'of 'p anind vi nay t d. 1atc i . l.n . s approved o bof►re October , 989 or,e I bsoquent reoeWal of an oi;i ate ng p! royal P are � e pte fro! t1 i I i mi.tatji on and m bo ocate ithie tiwo. anlloa o in or ;aid p evhed 11/23/00 b' FROM r L -D 379 -0 ` O: 5a3 684 7297 AUG 27 a 1991 10: 46rAM ##677 111 180 i. Stare+Le of o4uipn*nt or machinery necessary for mir erall and• aggrQgate ; extra sinV,, extraction en ar pra+ces 379 -7.3 Nohhe sensitive ''uses otherwise allowed through a Type 1 Procedure in the primary Land Use Distri 3/9-7.4 Uses permitted, through �� the pQr�nt teed three h e Y pe 11 procedure Primar , L 'a,nd 4Use District DiLtridA Usas which !say be Permitted through a T po III procedure in the Primary Aden ' i ., .:...d ° Use Oi st'1 ,,t subject to t e eppl subject o standards as set ,forth in Article IV aid SectiOn 379 -13 and 379°340 snd as nay he conditioned by the Kevin A o h Oity 379.0 iismbrratatatuamiLLISILLP6),1 Uses Permitted Through a Tyt I Procedure in the Primary 'Land Usa District except those us0s defined as noise sensitive uses, subject to the apps stable standards as set forth in Article IV. . t a prncedurr ati C' E 3'7940 The following uses are to ed sublet to the aReii�eb set per�i tta�`� e I b standards as set forth i n Article '� 379 10 i Noise sensitive uses allowed through hype g and T Pe xlprp cedures in the Primary Lend U $aa District sii ie ct r 9-r4. to the appllcabit stand rds in section 7 0.2 Uses otherwise 'permitted through 'o Type II procedure in the Primary, and Use District. 379 -10.3 The effected uusrr Y operator and quarry oWnee shall be noti;ftod of TYPO II actions pursuant to Section 204 -3e • • it'fLijii"littLiti4tgo: M44„,,,,••••• 379 -14.1 Use p tted '`.h uu011 a Type, Yt � �Ihi �h gay �,. ��i Use Di strict - n the Prt �e y Land the appl i able stn +da ds as set. forth n Airticle .IV the ®o and 5ertiUn 3794 an • nd9ti�:�or dux t 1164iOW Autho1rity • affectud u atAr °t `opera „or and eubarry �ll noti4404 of Type III action purteant a toction ..20.41•••••• X379 i a trtuv,e ` or tees 'ot spy • ° ;e11y authorized by ootlon 37? aovI s %1, 2,! FRROM 0 13 ,T i 503 584 7297 AUG 2?, 91 : t0 i 4?A t$6? 7 4 ant shall tdbmi t a plan for a mineral and eg i rill a te resource extrettien site, prepared by 4 certified gel o s n1 engineer, engineering testing n� or qualified pierso al i which ,demonstrates eonpl 1a with the following standards 379 -13,1 Dimensional Requirements A. Lot Are; The m1 iuuf area shall be that necessary to meet' setback raqui re@ a ite in Section 319 -1g,'1(4) D. setback 2: I Mineral and Aggregate extraction (a) One - hundred,(1®D) feet from any District A boundary . ' (b) Fiv4- hundred (500) feet from 'e nois$ . csensitive use existing at the tittle, this District was applied. ,District A boundary abuts another Di stri ct A boundary or Y a de��ignatd Mineral or regate r�esoerCq in an adjacent � countY, no sotback for mineral and eggre ate oxtracti Apt is required along tht the colon boundary line. Processio9 of mineral And aggregate mitOriali O Five- hufdred (500) feet from en District A bountery o (b) Seven-hundred end fifty (150) firt f 010 e not ee sehS i t i vt, use existing at the time this District is applied (3) Office, shop or other r accn 5ory strdttoro FiftY (50) feet from in eXterier ProPertY line. t (b) One - hundred (1 et 1 aworn nei se sensitive Use a eting,t the tip the District is en 9 4 �yl FROM a L-- LID ` mil r 1�I9i ie k 4M '?A iir6 '7 Oet ached dwci 1 i ng unit or menUfactuiged dwelling and related accessory StrUctUres fora caretaker or watchn'an. Fifty (50) �s�� feet fry t io . front prcp‘itb � line. (b) °ran (1O) feet f�°o�s a side or vo3r piraperty l i die. Storage of operational or i ono$erational equipment for the prodiuctitn and /or processing of rainerA1, and agg'e' material s « b Fifty (50) felt from aq District bounders. (b) Ortaa,hundred (100) feat froa1 a � et �i stntitive use existing at the Dist'ict is ()plied. 5 �ora a of overburden to be saved .for rec1 a ation uses fogy be alloWed within setbacks subject to cc nfarmenc* with th° reclamation ,plan. re f0ight The maaimo$ height of any t tr u ctore,, ex4ep t min ns al and og re nto prol;e ss i ng egui pfent A shel be thirtY4five (3 5) feet. Signs!: Magjmum sign area shell not exceed thirty ®fiVo (35) .kquere feet per entrtnC v 379-13 .2 Ser ening and Fencing Adocoate screening with indientiOUs plantings shell pe preserved or established, owhir�everd � � ssiaila tc sc ^een the .,view of tb h iii a.ed a of pent 'free and' p�*bl i c road , erba► i sand use ditalet and any na itt ing; noise ocatee � ithir� holua�end (1000 ) sensi t�,Ve nse � 1 o" t �, '�`h;� ap0rop�°i ate type of�. . feat 'bf the s�to n So�'tioh 4�� sba1� �� er �� and b�►ifferi6g i a aehii� vieW Autlhority For ..the etiarrmi red by � tie. a .. � ro �ri ate � s+�ree� ��hd p I000so of d t n the p p e n eret ni ner 1 tnd 4gotoci t an b�uffpriri t, pre .., ` t Ittion a 11 :to considered an inc uatriel Urn 3 Vi s eI 0: 5a3 684 '7297 aUG 99i i0a4IAM fi77 P.13` Fencing shall be required to eliminate any 'sa etY m hazards that 4 h ' of s i tt may create or ad3ac!Ont and uses Whtlin fencing is required to elimiIrate mt Y h zari it shall 'be �o cYol l)no type 4 ms inimum of si* (0) feet high. The'lOcation of fencing �, te el iMinate a s of hwzard .Shall be dater n+ d by the Review (it heritye 79 -13.3 Acccsa A. All prive.�d access reads from mineral and, a hwa's roads or stAgra ate Sites to p�blio hi� reets shall be paved or gravelled. If goovel1ed, the *cross road shall be graded and oiled as ne dod during the period from Juno to September to minimize du :tm If Access f, om a minerrl end aggregate site uses Pavel ledt public highways, reads p streets, the Revisits Au\ horit shall require the mineral and eggreg tfo Site oPertktar to grade And oil these road ',1aYs redul arl y to the extent needed to minimizo tmptcts 0e adjacent lend uses. An effective vehicular barrier or ate shall be Bess oihts; to the 1 ite„ required at all a� p, 370-13.4 Hours of Operations A. , Bl ast n g shall be restricted to the hours of 9 gd .._s. a�4 tO 600 . .�,�,A Hondmy through Friday. No �r ��n� blasting shill ac.cur on Saturdays t $ following holidayse (1) January (2) . Merori l DaY (a) 41 (4) Cabot pay (5) T'hanksgiging l) SY (6) V'ec unbar 2 g rant exce tions ta.the � n The Revi �►W Authority y ma ,� f " th $ mineral and hours of ��pere►ti,on off ..o s t � aggregate ext �aCtion per g atioh that are aub� ec to restricted operating hours through a Type II p rooedure pursuant to the following: • FRM L-1 a 503.684 72 0:27i ` 1991 , 49AM 4877 P.14 111193 There , ore 00 .no:i ie sans i t1 V i u , *s l or, ted within on e thousand (1000) Feet of the rni %ing site; or if, noise sensitive uies ere 1ooa,ted rcithin ei � , one thousshd (1000) foot of the 1nin too ' will not: exnae . 'noise thu it�cres,� ®d actliDl y 'the, ..a standerds 'established by the cart nt �► N env i ronmentol •QMal l ty; or �rr the vest of blasting, the operator • shalt �e In t po as1 b' for , not �� fyi r noise senfls i t.1 V one' thousand ( 1000) foot ,,. Y . us.a$ �aiti��rr � ;. first class mail, which is railedi at least • �' hours ripr to the date and nl�rat�r $i� ,�� ► spproXiellAtt tip Of the bl gst1 no Activity, for. whIchAhe operator receives en exception The Rilview:Aothorittmettirlitit:oxtocitioosA0 the h f' r those a�' nere yid _ _ of operatlep, o aouret�.T.te extr ootiof .operations that .,ire subject to)r�dstricted operating hours through a Type. . procodure when idd�i�tionol hours of operation are ecc��wcdeto oduction to needed t0 'r! incre�sed�prubl i� ��"ge�c alleviate a pca11� emergency . P. ... which . Public' c road or stru�4ure i nC'� Index demo e to , . , �� for ... amounts e� i��re0st�. re0u9rus si�ai ics►nt ropai r or rebuilding siY9135 Eery i r ®nmont61 bn Mineral inl'�, i►g � tossinu . � re a i .pro �� ato resogrr�etgxthi� 9 �,g plip toc'k. i l itA t'O11 oenforno and s .. +� �� sttodards e' set forth in $ectipn 4 3, nvronmpnts i Perform X04' $tsrrJards The epp1 Lehi a not se a d omi salon'st;no rds oo the effective date of this Ordinance sh .l l be those' olopted by tie 0,"00P11-, r O rseio o+nn s ' Otototm of of Envi onmentei 00 41110 e set gort Ore 4 nlstr t v Rules 0 phi ter 340 0 dati o I c� e Ilitiotti 00 leo0sider f o ure these standards fod �� o �� youado�ted: by ho Board Resolution a Ad der ft Type ll Mearih� with , goneril i zed nrAit i oe aI 1, 0wners if retri)td within two- hundred hd' f1ftlr (2$0) :feet of list °ict bound rya 210.1 ,6 S4 `oty ttsndorls end equ pment used fo+ �e All b►�ildie s stroticturrs i � rsl the rodAtct {oil or processing of mne etd a rgre a1' a *neteri el s shat l ba ajei '.ta►l nod i r $006 �► >� . .sure that such bnlldngs'r strtirres 1��i�lne� ��l, e� end quip nt i 1 l not bec hod srd t I(. 1 FR�3M L..—D TO: 503 $94 7297 AUI3 27, 1.S9': 101 49A #E77 P 15 • 111 -194 ,Access to all .mineral and a997409atO. Sites shall be gated and lbctd'whon not 10 operation. 379 -13.7 Site Reclamation A site reclamation ation p1 an (prepared in conJunotidn with a State of OrPtgen surface 'Joining 00ortt i ng permit) Which dE n otrates that the mineral and aggregate extraction sit; Will l reclaimed for th�l and s ecified in the Prima� y District all G subm tted The reclamation plan shall prepared by the a 1icant or thepa;...1icant's agent and approved by the y Sate of Orh,�gon Dopartmunt of Geol ogy. an�J Mineral Industries pq�rsuaot to ORS Chapter 517 and the standards and procedures contained in OAR chapter 632# Division 30 or oivition 350 whichever 1$ appl iceble. 379 -13.8 Performance Arent A. The operator of a mineral ond aggregate site . p '� the tar has idenoa bn shall rov1d1 the County siffioiert eve en annual, beLi s that t opera h_ in full ford* *nd effect the bond or security deposit r+euui rod by 010 617.810 to assure conformance with t� ., h a 5tste6.rega�ired reclomktion P1004 Fai uro of tho applicant to maintain the required bond or security deposit shall Constitute a violation of Sectibm 379e .LL..�p.r hall be insured B. Mineral and aggregate o oratipt � s t J1 i y for $Snbc Qo.:Og agai nit 1 i , is fro. roductioni activities and r ®oerations ar ..n�. � R .. . wr�� .P incidental thereto conducted or cet d On by virtue of any law,.ordinanoe or condition td such insurance sh 1 r ne kept in force and effect :durin o f such operatioes. A 9 the Seri ao prepeld po icy.of such, insurance .. th is �eff'ect i ve for. a period of o ye . hall be . depos i t ad wl th the County prior to commencing gay p tons. cy mineral and aggregate p erg r "r'h ®�pol i shall . be �rgn�►wed annual 1y with Proof o renewal deposited with the Count,Y annu& i y d Ftiilure to deposit such policy or.. to ma1nt4 o continual insurance cPyoraga coast >lt ?.ate a Vialatio0 Of Section 379a 370-14 o.... ,t1 . a N ..,o addition to the development si,andards l required by the printery s . .0 r . � _.. 1:v uses an�� t of � ni b�e �or�a� ®►.,ia 1 and use dl strict th® es�t��b i shn�e� the creation of new. par �ls that are e1 '1e loin withi ii nnri1 and Ag�irg�'�ate overlay District shtl'1 be stub jest to t'ne fo1l owi 1j s Revised 11/23390' « N „3 FROM a TO: 503 604 7201 AUG 2'?, j99i 10 :40AM 467? P' i6 15 379 -14 1 Setbacks: 'he Ocaatian- of nett noise and dust sensitive uses, constructed after the ostebl i shment of District B, shai � be situated .an the .p arcel to tainimize se otantia1 i . he location of. adverse effects of nc� _ and du$t nal.f. noise and.dust sensitive uses shall take into consideration the surrounding topography end- trinSPortitien'sYStestontly. it . nocessary, setbacks greeter than those required by the primar 'Vand Use district May be imposed by the Review Aut_ority0 379 -14 2 Noise Reduction Measures Noise induction measures maybe regpa� red c,f ' � � � � the nwnor of caw noise Dens i t i eo uses Constructed .after the eats .. erMined by, the b1 i shmegt caf' Di stri,ot when det. �e c+�m .11 ance be necessary to ensur p Re�rl�►w �ut�ho�it�Y to by the District A !use With eppH icabl'e coi s$ regulations.. reduct i On rneesurea Cay include, but not be limited to, vegetative buffors, bovos, we 1s, insulation and orientation of wioadoW$4 and shall b deter i ned by the Levi are Authority. 370,14.3 ifla1 v'er of R onstrtnoe s Prei air to issuance of soy buildln ptv,anits for net ... uses after estsb i. shment of, this Doistrict, the�oi'i r shall 41 00 and record, in Q � afire. $ortgse Records of ��err�nt f�r�� Waiver ion the deed and '� occa+pant a tna ,. county,. of remonstrance that the, of the property wi 1 1 oot object to , m i heral al!'d aggregate resource extraction and Orotees1ng activities as provided for in District Ai 370.,14.4' Creation of Now Lott or Parcels A noteti ova shell bo pl Good on the hest at i h9 r��n cre � 1 i s t a new 1 of � . or° parce or src+�"�_`, which atates the , let � ..b ec e ate �� sta�i�t B and and issuj . Mineral ....and .A �r . v�ithln _ �, Aggregate to the standards of Section 3700 Minerer and Oren ay Oi strict 310.1 �► 379;: initial Review. lnitiai Reviews of a Mineral and aggregate resource operation Shall be PPoteated as a Typo Y sCtion u W1 th ►; s1 (e1. Months of c*eoci mp a mi oeral ar ag re `ate resource oxtr ctlon and rooessing opera ion, the operator shat au 1t app op iate Revised r. FROM; L T1 ,ALJG: 27 P { 1991 ' P :.9®Ar t4G7 F.1? evidence, pre ared by qual i fi ed personnel .documenting that the., p is tl on tortfa s' to ' the standards contained the, Soeti on 372.13 and other a ; Review spp'� w cr�l e t rid and os�d by the �t� Aj`thbrty.� � Should 0,; the documentation requi red by Saction .o�� erati o� does n 3/9.75,,1(0) indicate that the ,.p the oesrnetr conform 4o the ►i�Pl 1 cabl a standards 3 shall be given :sixty (60) days in which to make acessary Moeificationa. Should the opereto th cessaO y rdificsticfrs within. �� n0�iil� �1 to o xty( y�' 6a d� ernod, �h the a/ lotted si Director shall begin revocst i on i proceedi rag s as outlined in section 201-74 979 1542 Periodic Review A. Following the initial review Of operat i oni: requird in Section,379- 15.1(B), any permit i ssuo4 to operate a mi nerli1 ar�d s , ° r. ate eperti on ; porsuMnt to section 319 hn11 b e reviewed every five (5) year from ythe date of the initial review to determine whether additional conditions are necessary to bring t he opera 1 on into comps i ance with thit, land usrs 'egulAtiou$. ff°, withstandingxthia� periodic review, the pe a P" be revs wedby the Director at any time deemed necr�sshry a update the conditions dues to aMOnd0Ants to the regUi reI %ts of. this District or ptki :any land u ge a a the original approval, or district et t�i+a time of th if evidence exists .. th& the oPeratiofi is not in f apprpva1 compliance . With � �` of a riot, 6r, tom. ondltion o u i t be determined d that .. ill o�b�f�>at � on i com dances of apprpv ►l ' . in comp1ience with the con the Director . Shall, begin revocation pnccead I ues as outlined in Section 221-74 T he planning Director shall s Fund �� notice first .class mail to the operator no 10$3 than sixty d0) days Prior to the date of the sc periodic hedu1ed rswiewm Periodic review of a rineral and 'Rgreg4to roa,urce opera, shall be rocfsse as a T�►P x ipn P �r act1Ofl4 ,13 E0 f 0rcel'Ont The P anning a rector r his /her a�thorisee dt� 'gin a du1 y suthori and peace officer; , �s 1 sago nil f`or �ititi,Ion f0v v joist i on of section 379, as err �' dod fo i n cat i on 1 of rco�ent /24, • r, PQnM : L -D 1, gg 3794 503 G 4 72 , AUG 2? 1,991 5 P.NI &t``'? ire 1e 111 at i4ineral and Aggregate t (A and 0 Hsi nntion OverlaY a��t�w�c shall be removed from a miniiral and 6ggre9ate resource site when: 379 16.1 The mineral and tggr'og*te resource site has been f✓ /� ®clai�red in accordance with the provisions o ivision Chapter' 617 OAR Chnppteto, 632, Division 30 or whichever is applicable; and Sction or ®36, 21916 � Th e owner of the. Mineral end AggPegate resouurtz site p submits evidence showing the Mineral and Aggregate Overlay District is no ,ginger justified or needed. S t.h a�request shall ba processed as 4 Typo c? t 379 ..11 , f 11, Notwithstanding other provisions of this Code, the following pro vid;ions shall be applicable to District 37 All ex1� t1n mineral and a fire ate rt1Mtad uses not ,�d9 �7m A conforming to the Provisions of Section 379 maY continuo r` � operate , ac cgrd in to the Provisions vi sion s o f Section 4s� Nonconforming Uses. otwit� anding the he prawis ien uf ,Section 440, any application for oxpas i an of It'lloncomiformin0 mineral an d aggregate related use ah ri l apply for a T yp e 11 development permit according to the provisieans of Section 3794 t z�� aggregate �o _�.�_ d use al 1 owed pro , X79 17 � � X11 �i neral and egg ,, A ti 4141 use Permit end v i oust y by the County by cora� i o� designated as a District A silo sha';1 toi►tlnue to 1 operate in accordance with the to Hai t1 ens app only for �ipnt emit and Hood os� �� "�pp1 y _ : r' a �'�p�, . � i dp�� oP� he tilts of at the time a� review ®� conditions. At review of corrditions® the mineral ' and egat with h related use shall n cad to co i. wit Lite � � District to not be rbu� is .of +ter � s setback or let e regU i rnr en the extent that such imposition uould interfere 'with the existing eStab'� i shad rtri np�' n1 and aggregate related' use on the site 79 11 G 3 All mineral an d �. a fi re n to related uses nonconforming to f o rmin ti th o a p rOvisions of Section 79 as well as all mi ner� and aggregate related uses allowed previous 1 by the Coun't by conditional d0o permit, � � she 1 iO4ate1 have, to comply with the following . Provisions of Section 9 excbt. os, provided in -17.4 below: 1 'II • Aa 379'13.4' hours Of Operations 379.13.S EnVirohmohtal Standards. 24/0 5tb3 0:44 P9 RUIN ` S 9.901, 1,0 '71 P. 1,9 I:aA. `Y O.:. 1171 1 a 4 The . o Un fin ds that those require It S are r *io cessa Y for the health* safety ,end environmental protection the pubs' C f All requirement of 1 . Operation) or 379-13,,5 (Environmental Standards) thit would unlewfUllY interfere with th vested tight of oonconforming use to continue sh411 he inapplicable to .t11,4 oohc n 'o ►i ti uset however* if violation of uiratto�ot O 379.1344 or 379 by a; conforming , ot Aon onformi n u results in a nui Safi e * aCt on y bb '�ro ht to eats it. an negate related uses must, comPl Y with tho Provisions �� 5 All nevi Mineral Section ' ® 379. TO: Larry Epp, tein, Hearings Of f i ea Jerry Offer, Associate Planner DATE: August 19, 1991 SUBJECT: Additional Comments - SUB 0012 The attached comments from Scott Xing, of Washington County ° s Department, of Land Use and Transportation, ands v d Westerman, � anal neighbor of the pro oeed development, Jere recei report on this proposal was completed. Washington County's pp e added to the City ��ded conditions e of � ��1 should be �► staff 's recommended conditions included within the staff report under items to bP completed prior to recording the final plat with Washington County. ��t� King should be the contact person. will be prepared to respond to Mr. Westermarits letter at the public hearing upon my preliminary . review of p ` 9 newt Monday, anticipate Play significant changes to the h� comments, i do not � recommendations contained in the staff report. ° No 14. ;391-001.2 / ROSE MEOWS Comity ham. roliewed this development iUUs Washinitton la's 'which arni expected to generate 200 or vehicle trips day. request is ea to genzatate 267 daily tri. . 4 The o a analysis will review o? Within site's t a. When the 'analysis ice, I Will forward y additional, specifio reeolatmendations the City. This view shouad be cottpleted within . � dP ice► a waiver not to rammatrate against the formation o a 1=1 improvement district b ll n SW Wit Street between I r site and SW, 135th Avenue. a waiver not tO monstrate against the to ion of a local licciroveuent, district oe other Imecbanisin to improve anal vaintain Fern Vtreet Itietween its we woke= twill= and SW 51.5th ue. The docontnts � conditions A., 2 e �.1 prepared lay the Wes. Y Division tuld teooried in tho Washington 641,timit plans in lingineer DiVisien approValt and obtain a .. f ci1ity patlit for ccristructiOn a the follotAng itottttvegatzta: Concrete sideforalk to Oounty 6tilniiard along F o kdociutite ratty' linage along all sw Perri Straet Pride SW *tarot 8treet between th64 � s � 135th Av e with 22 foot paved ar4 Weak C otpectartay of . l lets than tip' e yew, rtii at Land '�� and �`��ptat� „tion, Land DaVeIopmGht $a icao i. Evislon North first app r4rma P:r �� a = A t i Obh 6/124 t b site's sty line . Provide SW ,35th Avenue, with a 22 foot pav y. lAtitith old a wear Sao life 417060tallqi ot not less than five years. Itrar toaffio ityzovemantet requited ; '. a result of the Count& ffia ° ily ism Time improveffientst shall be oonstrizoted a ..r with the _ of th Wait i ' Uniform Th*d o t` �?Lgn Standanis. . . e. ahall be actplete and p the Y Q it you any ciaestions. plea contact me at 648-8761. Transportati Planner 13665 SW Fern a3treet Tigard OR 97223 16 August 1991 .. Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard OR 97223 RECEIVED PLANNING AUG 1 6 1991 Dear Mr. Offer I am writing on behalf of several members of ' the Pern Street Neighborhood regarding the Hiller development proposal SUB 91 -0012 t for the Rose Meadows subdivision. 5: would like to raise several points for yK the staff to consider in their recommendation to the hearings officer. :' The families in this neighborhood did not imagine that Mrs. Cook's field would develop in any way other than in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood which is an enclave of large single-family houses on expansive lots. The median price of the houses in this area is well in excess of $170,000. tie never supposed that we would suddenly be faced tb r, with the erection of 26 new homes on this lot, and we are even more dismayed to learn that the developer's intention is to construct homes in the $80000 to $110000 price range. This would obviously have a negative impact on the surrounding property values, and seriously damage the neighborhood In this sense, and to this extent, we the ambiance of are opposed to the development as it has been proposed. There are a nu ae° . of specific points w most raise oirnts which we would. like to concerning the px,� posed development. The most serious is the major aµ. impact which the traffic from this development will have on the neighborhood streets. SW Walnut Avenue and SW Pern Street. The at' right-of-way for the streets is currently owned by the county, and the streets have been paved and maintained by private funds collected from bear the within the neighborhood. the continuous Use The streets constructed to which weight of massive construction equipment, Walnn;it in particular is an this quatetstreetefor ©th3ntpurpose�, ®nd should be reconstructed, with a inadequate deeper foundation, wider pavement and a sideWalk on at least one side. The requirement for a s _ . _ children sidewalk is based up�►�, the fact that the c e along Walnut to the intersection from this development will have to walk _ concerned about this with 135th to meet the school bus We are gravely aspect of the development as well. This intersection is currently very th there is often a .. cars, standing dangerous for cal�+ni�e�r &th�severalor the us, as there along and in the crowd of Children, along road during cold weather. The new development will more than double thew school age poi nlat ion within the neighborhood` and will seriously W exacerbate the prakllems and safety hazard at this corner. ti When the Washington County comprehensive 'plan for Bull Mountain was draftee: the area immediately surrounding the Horse Brother's quarry on New Scholls Perry Road was designated as a zone of special ,i pact. ., Wash:$ngton County imposed special b.aildinm1 restrictions within that area. The proposed development lies withinthat oe, bt th a city y of f Tigard failed to adopt �oning�s nzn au wth this circumstance of noisy industrial mtediateq adjacent a residential zone. We feel that this issue should be addressed prior to the approval of any development on this property. It is ironic that during the weak that the request for comments was mailed, the neighborhood experienced a problem with noise from the quarry which resulted in several complaints to the county sheriff. The quarry has been operating at its maximum schedule, which is 6 IM to 10 PH. The house at the southeast corner of the property has a gasoline tank buried in its driveway. The development proposal carried insufficient detail to determine on which lot this tank will falL In a discussion with the Tualatin Valley fire marshal, I was given to understand that this tank must be removed prior to development. It is impossible to ascertain the size ze and contents of the tank without removal, and in my opinion this represents a major fire hazard both for ntv houses on the property and for the existing neighboring houses. We feel that approval of a private 'hammer-head' street within the development, solely to maximize the available footage and thus the developer's profit, vould be a serious mistake. Enforcement of the no- parking requiremeut on such a street would be unlikely, and the resulting crowded condition will prevent the appropriate access of emergency vehicles and increase the likelihood of serious r .:Teas should a fire erupt. Also, the designation of this street as private will lead to a situation which already exists in many parts of the city in which the neighborhoods do not adequately maintain their streets, to the detriment of all. The character of our neighborhood is very important to us, and one of the major aspects character which we prize highly is aspects of that ch the presence of many large mature trees. The proposed improvements to sW Fern seem to us to be unnecessary, and as drafted will require the removal of several large fir and cedar trees. We request that the builder be granted one or more variances to eliminate and/or modify the requirement for street improvement at this portion of the site to save these trees. j Tf the street must be widened, we request a variance to permit such widening to save as many trees as poi °Able, If a sidewalk is : equired, we request a variance in the placement of the sidewalk to avoid the removal of the fir trees which lie within the current path of the sidewalk at the southeast corner of the development. The hill on Fern Street at the southeast corner of the development has been a major traffic problem during icy winter conditions since the road was paved. The creation of an additional;" driveway onto that hill presents a serous traffic hazard. We recomMend that such access not be Permitted. F' Although I am not an evert on tiVase matters, it appear 0 that the lot designs for this subdivision do not meet the solar adceas requirements. The lefts along the west border of the develop Gent seem too narrow to provide adequate .,soles access. We urge the staff to particularly exa tine this aspect of the ' design. The city of Tigard has as a Planning goal the 'provision of neighborhood parks so r � A Park. e c�loseet p - mile fro �a� �.o home is further than 1/2 �� Park to this aivision is well beya'rod that range The developer sha uld be required to donate or sell to city, One of the lots for creation of a playground /park within the development. tt is a reasonable expectatn that these homes will be purchased by families with �.® children, and the availability of a park Within the development will be both safe and convenient for these childre1110 as well as the surrounding neighborhood. We in the neighborhood look fo and to reading the staff report on this development, and to attending the public hearing on this matter. Yours truly, Larry gee Lerman Brody Westerman David and Patty Obey Otis Cagle r uce Jamieson Jim Lewis Nikki Hora Cuss Hanson Dori Williams Evan and Betty Whitaker Steve Bruneau i�I " �. ,rr1 i.,1S. '�o r6 t +!',.Kd Y� �� 7 +:1i• ��•`. STATE OP OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard (Please p iht) That I am a ° W The City of Tigard a Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUEL;TC HEARING FOR: I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission ``Tiger d Hearings Officer .„_... Tigard City ` Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Harked Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named per attar :,ed list marked exhibit "B" on the said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto bulletin board on the day of in the United States Mail on the Postage prepaid. bona at the addre s ehown on the day of . t ca hed 0 Was poe • on an appX,0prlate , 19 ® and deposited Prelred „'�; �!ticae, Posted _ For °Decir ig Onb ,1,4` S bacribed a tie 'Sworn/affirm to me on the NO/ u, + PUBLIC OF O iEGON NY Lesion Rk+ires `"-” Fereo ho delivered to POST OFFICE Subspribed and 0votn/affirm to me on the ,{.rift♦ y ak .p fr �, u,7r�,J,a� ��_' N OTICE O F PUBLIC HEARING E.cs.r'- A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGAR D HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEATING ON MONDAY, august 26,_1221, AT 7:00 PM, 13 THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENT ER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: SUB 91 -0012 FILE TITLE: Miller APPLICANT: Paul Miller OWNER: Same Rt. 5 Box 62 Sherwood, OR 97140 REQUEST. SUBDIVISION SUB 9 -0012 paLLER (NPO t3 & #7) A r oguest for Subdivision approval to divide an approximately 4.97 acre site into 28 parcels ranging between approximately 5,000 and 12,630 square feet each ZONE: R -7 (Residential, 7 units/acre) LOCATION: 13735 SW Walnut Street and 13725 SW Fern Street (WCTM 251 4BD• tae lot 400 & 2S1 4BU, tax lot 1500) APPLICABLE tiVIEW CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, 8.1.3; C unity Development Code sections 18.50, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 18.160, 18.164. (See Hap On Rever8e Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON TAIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18 32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND Mt BE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD OF TEE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST PPON THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD CONPRENENC CVE PLAN. APPR('`' no OR DISAPPROVAL CF THE REQUEST BY THE COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE TEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT CONVENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. i ISSUE U PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE • SPECIFY RAISE CRITERION FROM THE (COMMUNITY' TER A• ,xLUD3E PERSON 5•P � THE FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES N APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. ALL DOCUMENTS IN THE ABOVE.-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE t'OR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTA.INEU FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE ,AV'AILAB'LE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PMR PAGE wi FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTAl T THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 639 - .4171, TIGARD (NPO) , 2 S ' , CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION NPO 4 3 & 7 . I CITY HALL, 13 5 �� HALL D3L d'D d ()R CONT&AC.. CHAIRPERSON: NPO 3 Herman Porters PHONE NUMBEnz 639- -0895 CHAIRPERSONS NPO E Cal. Waotery ,— PHONE NUMBER: 639»4297. u _ EgTENS1ON W WALNUT ST. FERN 261048D -00200 ••••eo•o•emi s•.O'm • J lMIES0N, D 13RUC4 RITA }? 13585 SW WALNUT TIGARD OR 97223 2511041)3D"v00O0 oe .r o =MAN, mat SHIRLEY 12615 SW 1I6TE CT TIGARD OR 97223 2S1O4BD"- 0070C •cre4O.MOOD +O ♦•••a SCHMXDT, 0 PETER AND gLAINE 12660 SW 136TH CT TIGARD 2$1046P-003O0 . .. O . /. 0 • • • . O • • l!1 Y e O ,9t m • CAGLE, I5. T RUBY 'a 13635 SW ;WALNUT TIGARD 2S1048D -00600 m•••••Om4. "JO.O••e•0AO WNITARER,, EVAN A U BETTY M 12665 SW 136TH CT l 'IGi OR 97223 4464 251048D -00800 0... GORTON, JOB S AND HATHLEEN 13590 SW WALNUT TIGARD 25104191 .u01300 ••e•4o.04ee044460+4o4 .VILAND, RAVDALL AND OW!N 13625 5W VERN ST TIGARD 251048D- 41400 e. +o•e•+4•.etie•ea4.p. WESTFRNAN,I ;I RRI* A /JOD ( 136655 SW FERN STREET TIGARD OR 97223 281043D -01600 4e444e.o44e44 WILLIAMS, DONNEL N AND STEPHANIE 13865 SW FED TIGARD OR 97223 BRUNEAU, •6,46pmp...esoe.O; ..d.aeom.. BRUNEAV, 5'1Ji2PHEEN 0.f 11285 SW WALNUT TIGARD OR 97223 e.ds•.•'O 2$1042D -01700 • .e.c e.e4•.be•ii.0 •. HOHR, CLARENCE A DONNA 16555 SW 131ST TIGARD= OR '97223 2S1Q4ND- 01900 r+ •'1�. • O . • • s O • O . a O .� O • . 0..+ Lt E 04=8 8 AND ZADF''c ' 13710 SW4ERN. STREET TIGARD OR 97223 , 251048D9 °02000 O4o444,.4 o7444e.reaue, STONE, TILLMAN J'AND . DEBORAH /3120 SW FERN ST TIGARD OR 97223 2$10480 -00101 444444444444444444o RRU8GNR3, RARGLRY F ET AL RT 1 BOX 792 BEAVERTON OR 97007 251048D -02100 . . . 4 4 o 4 4e•• •e • BENS'DTI, MARCO' A/SALLY A 136;?af 0 SW FERN St TIGl' ',RD OR 9722 2510480 ,-02500 44444446444440•4464 4 LEWIS, JOHN ELIZABETH A 13990 SW PENN TIGARD OR 91223 25104EC -00100 ole•eew6 +•0 •s HOFFMAN, PAUL RUSSELL AND APLXNG, Ar ZYNN : H 13985 SW FERN TIGMW 25104135 0260th 4464 .e 44e•opwoa4 e4 ST pLERRE, IRRY 13002 SW FERN' ST TIGARD OR 97223 r.. PAUL MILLER RT 5 BOA: 62 SHERWOOD, OR 97140 HERMAN PORTER 11875 SW MAME 8T TIb, OR 97223 . 4l9 I _ w �i� q Y •.,_ f z.' u �A �� rG -.'bM i, � 1 .'! i- __ CAL Woorom ' 12156 SW 112ND CT TIGARD, OR 97223 RD, likG014 CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, �P0Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) ,339_417 /2.10,52?-1 /i2- 1 . GENIAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATIoN /37J ff r ''' %/' TAX al) AN' TAX LOT N°°,13,5 / -- 42 2,Ly'OC? eg _71 L.- 2_ SITE SIZE , ' 7 44 :5 PROPERTY PROPERTY b�nOWNER/DEED HOIDER *, � P ✓,�, �„ __ „�.. FOR STAFF USE ONLY C 2'.. ASZ NO4 ()TILER CASE NO'S o REE EIrT NC). ILL= APPLICATION ACCEPTED ACCEP DATE: 7 �°- Application elements submitted: (A) Application form (1) B) Owner's signature /written authorizatic (C) x l: - MA (1) (D) Assess p :' s map (1) (E) Preliminary Plat (pre -app e- checklist) (r) Applicant's s statement (pre -app checklist) (G) List of property owners and addresses w than 250 feet (I) (H) Piling fee ($4;, plus $5 ee ( l5 per lot) '".t _ o,._.., ADDRESS r. J c'�i< PHONE 4.2.27:.-a.572... .,..a ZIP CITY APPLICANT* ADDRESS ,....... CITY ZIP *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant ,oust be the purchaser of record PHONE or a Ieasee to pospessaLon with th written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owe er(s) must sign this appl;'.cation in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application The ...._.v _ . owners of record of the subject property request permission to diva �.ie a (Total Area parcel into 2 lots between (number �er o. lots) square q c :feet in size. DATE DETERMIWED TO BE COMPLETE :FINAL DECAL IOW' DEADLINE z N.P.O. Number: Final Approval Date: Planning Engineeritlg Recording Date ,aiad Number: . Lint any variance, Planned Develc went Lands, c other land, use actions to be considered . as part of this application: • Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the . attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. • THE APPLICANTS) SHALL CERT /FY .THAT: A. The above re. test does not . violate any deed restrictions that may a to; fir_ a e d u p o n ttie Sub jet t ro et --- -�-- -� • .a.f the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the tights granted in accordance subject to all the conditions and, with the terms and s limitations of the approval • All of the above statements and ,,the statements ,in the plat plan,`' xh bite' transmitt a ; . attachments, that any Permit i are true and ' the plicants8 so acknowle dlge � ed herewith!, it issued - based on this false. , may be tevo%,ed if it is found .that any such statements are a 1ics,tior� m' ti false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, pr; including VI w p olicies and crite is � and understand the re q u 4,r amen ts for approving g or denying the applications SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. (K ;L:p, /O52oP) EeZ46 vo a4v0I1 �B B+ sa MS ` E66C XUUV7 #atillaI4 IS ° W t r ¢ . o .. °l�9Z0•.w°7ii!OTSZ E4Z46 1i0, tP�G tai M$ -S96E agV 170SS d *• - "O4•R u4 •,0•'q'.000(.O.R 114 °tomt44OH o too-.O$ ®T9w EZZLE, go 00v0TX mE, m a d M6 OS9ET_ V A 'S/V oz»,i w EZ,L6 HO ovVOII L fl1 Ngaa MB OL&Xt if v0vg aiW 0 s0 70v00 {4agvq 4 'O O O O•' O• Y O• O A O O /{.�.0 4 006T0 ai• ZZZL,6 al0 adVDTX ISTEt M9 59991 'I v0goa 0014 001170 'UHOW •Yo•••°.••.♦,n. 'OOLTO -18 'Ot3Z EZZL6 WO QE fOI L /Hali /9 Hugo, MS 999EZ ,0 Agor/v XNUWX �411VN OISO .. °�.. ♦ . ••....••O•wo'° ;OOV0.®•'00tOLSE EZZL6 il0 EZZL6 NO elovesoeufr000s CZELS 110, EMS V �\ r aUVeLL 111117VM M9 06S ET V' HaarlEIVA agV Si gHOD ' N0(1110$' atIVOIX M0 H G9ET MS 999Zt N AJIa1 aNV al NVA2 AlIH1LIY • • . • . 00900- OHtOTsZ i xa MS S'E9Et �►. 2mng a�EXIO '070v0 S *.°""*. 00EQO -a�ito ;s ar oIm M 9ZSET £ ZLf O Ox?; Nkia4 MR 066ET i Hz fri zz am agoD '4 SIMr I . • • R . R R Rr . , . Y • ° a 005Ep- p4t®TSZ 4001.6 00 NoX0 . r00 Z6L XOe `C` asU g o n q o e o. w.• e o oI00 a0fl 0tSe • T.. ��yy p�q1 ;p c 0.r R..0�J!..ITW OL17, ,i Hd Mew. ®ZLE 1. 0V0as tc L' 77; 'a YO LB O *i O'O♦O.•. ?OOOY •O Y.. 0Q0 0-UWii0TSZ . • • EZZL6 NO f ' acfWIVM MB E8 T' D W 1Hda�LS ' nv inNi ♦ O • • • ♦ • � O . O . Y O • $ 00aT0- aa,ots EZZL6 '.0 awieu muma Mu 598ET S aINVHOHIS alcv Pi 1.R NOa ' SHVIZ'3IM ..o . .,.•• •••N. 91c070800tsZ EZZL6 NO irfgi 'IJ, JIB mu 44 Ms � N py�ySCSET r anal ♦ . .. Y P . • • .. Y . • . • • 0 0 00E O- cietatse' Zee/.6 N0 ai3�iDI�?e: mo 0.19E1 MS 099ZT a HNIVri W Z vmuuill 0 °o?+aINHOS �ZZL6'00. EEEL6'NO agVOLL X0 1119ET MS 9TH ET 'ii X070:(00 NHOP ' Ni1PPMHX e 00S00-ast O ksz aUVOTZ TfM b, Ms s8sE.7. as JIXU AHH ai ' Atos w zr • .. ... • • • 00200- atii'0t9Z 410E46 'glC;t aUVOTI IS Nkla4 MS Z66ET •:'mod cl 170.0 ' 170.01' 248 40, 170.01! 400 48 SIC, .46 4,v. 123,3,L.,; . 21,37 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] BEQU8T . Pg 60MMENTS DAT�Xm2��.�.. MO N: Tigard Planning Department RRs SUED V /0'0N: 013 1 (NPO #3' & #7) A regueat for subdivision approval to divide an approximately 4.97 acre site into 28 , '^ %a r'i ying. between approximately 5,000 and 12 630 square feet each. ZONE: R-7 (Residential, 7 units /acre) LOCATION: 11735 SW Wa1ynut fstreet and 13725'. ( � tax 1e:%t 1500) St/ Fern Street i�'CT�+! 2331 4BT9P � ��x lot 40rr"� & ��. �Bl?a Attaeted is the Site Platt and applicant' a gitateMent for your review., From information supplied by various departments and agencies Hand from other information mailable to cur staff, a report and recommendation Will,' be prepared and a. , decision will be rendered on the 'proposal in thot near future. If yon Wish " this application, y P \' ,,..:.g. 0 1391. You nay s,eo th provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. to co�mgnt on thy: w® n®ed our coie3en .2; , .., o ar , alb►1.e _t© reetarnd_ „y th ve .da„ , please phone the staff 'contact noted; below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as scion as post/able. aig ep have PC BoX questions 397 13125 Sid Mal Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: Planning regarding - this Matters contact the Tigard 639 -4171 STAFF CONTACT: ,,,Lettkji .,.,.. PLEAF.ta C E+CK T FOLLOW/NO ITEMS THAT APPLY: we have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed lett4br. Written comments: "�i�iwis�swet Name of Person Commenting: Phone Neer .J bkm/ sUB91 -i2 affi Y f. ir+riu.wriar.w. /nae'wNe.+ NOT CATION LIST FOR _ ALL . APP7LZ( j NPO NO. Lti L7(2) copies CITY DEPARTMENTS Building eifficial /Bxad R. P0 NO. City Recorder 'angineeWing /Chria D. Permits Coordinator /Viola G . SPECIAL "D ,,STRICTS Fire District (Pick -ny box) N./- Tigard Water District 6777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Parka & Recreation Board Police T ,�%, Field C Peyrstione t�/D �t� �1 Ft.°30611804S A) (Colvimilivt 011-9 Schoc1 Diet No. 48 (Beaverton) Joy Palk,]. PO Box- '200 Beaverton, DR 97075 Scheool Dist. 23r (Tigard) 13137 SWPacifichwy. Tigard, OR 97223 _ Metzger Water District 6501 SW TaylkIre k'erry Rd Tigard, OR 97223 AFFECTED JTIRT SDICTIOS Wash., Co. ,Land Use a Trani p. 150 N. First Ave. Rulleboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis - ItevIn Martin Joann Rice _V- tf. Scott Ring` ,._ Fred Eaer1 Mike 4torreecon City of Beaverton, Jim Bendryx PO Box 4755 Beavert n, OR 97076 State Highway Division Lie Gunderson PO Box 565 Beaverton, OR 97075 SPECIAL AGENCXF General Telephone Mike Lutz 12460 SW Main St. ;; igard, OR 97223 /' NW Natural. Gas Ronald D. Polvi, PE w PL S 220 NW Second Ave.; Portland, OR 94 209 BoundaryComaiseiOn 320 SW Stark Ro m 5?10 Portland, OR 97204 DLcD (CPA's only) 1175 Court St. NE Salem, OR 97310 - -0580 TCI Cablevi aion of Or'e.iotn Mike H alloc r 2500 SW Bond Portland, OR 72O1 Portland General Elec. Brian Moire 14655 SW Old Scholia Fry. Beaverton, ©R 97007 Metro Area Communications J aeon Hewitt Twin Oaks Technology center 1111.4 NW 169th Place 8-6020 Beaverton, OA 97005 -4686 �.. US West Pete' &e "icon 421 SW Oak St. iartai��i OR 91/204 STS' E AOE1 C] E e +anautice Dior. (0DOT) Engineer Hoard of Health ,Fish & Wildlife Par103 !" :Recreation ply. Subdivie ion $u L, or DePt i of Energy Dept9 of Enriron. Quall,t1r Division „oJ SUti .La ids. commerce 'Dept . ± - 3.11. t. Par; . FED A ENC; ES 'Corpo. a ngLncera Poet Off ice OxR Soutttaern Pacific TranaportatiOn Company Duane M. Forney, PIS - Prc3ect Engitneer 006 NW 6th n renr e, 1 . 3244, ttnton Station, Portlanr ,' OR 93209 bkta /NO . LST I ATV " T:(e RD iWOOD r OCR ECG: X PT 0 "` PfYiYe4N' ' RECEIPT No. 01-4e,CK AMOUNT CASH (MOUNT PAYMENT DATE, I SU D VISION 55140 00 0. 00 07/09/51 PIJRPOBE OP )VMME 6 "r MOUNT PAID PURPOSE or P BENT I $ 1 0 1 1 9 I . 0 D., Soo .00: [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]