The URL can be used to link to this page

S 1-86B POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. _____ b. Policy 3.14!;,,,,!.,, Ll be satisfied provided tha ks,,,e".- portions of the lots which• .e.p' eed 25% slope are not graded o'..',!'illed without a _ „,:',.-_,..,.,.........,,,,N Also, the wetlands areas on the site will be evaluated as part of the , ,, e:kee' e required permit from the U.S., Army Corps of Engineers ard the Division eeelre..,*.es,' land State Lands, ,..,,,..4%.e.e,t,,;,tt, flood plaih\will be avoided. If any of the proposed street does ''.""‘eet,'.,':::',.1 encroach upOn the flood plain, a Sensitive Lands Permit will be required. .v,„?r,,,,-;4-!+;i:,,,,',::ti Policy 7.1.2 can be met when additional information, noted in the :ter.e;',-e*f'e Engineering Divi'Sion comments, is submitted and appropriate mitigation '..e,e,: e:itt'ee: e. Polef.cy 7.3A and 7.4:4 are satisfied because adequate water and e".'4:!..',:eete,;, sewer facilities are akepilable to the development. The applicant ':e'el.'-'4.:*,' ,1'..e:,, also indicates that thee'e facilities will be provided within the = e.,,I'..:; ,,.' f. Policy 8.1.1 will be met ondq, the termination of Riverwood Lane at 92nd Avenue is justified o‘e\1/4 provisions for future extension to ..,,,,,..7,,,-.4,,,,,,*1-1.,, g, PoIicy 8,1 ,3 will be satisfied when the conditions of approval relating ';,'f",,,:',,..'„ .••:'::'1 to street improvements are complete\d\, e,tv,,e;.... ,-:,,. WHEREAS, THE City Council has deter:pi ed that the proposal is consistent 'Y::e'!:e7',1e..:61,1.171''' with the relevant portions of the Community velopment Code based upon e: .1',.`,2'...t.1 the findings noted below: a. Chapter 18,50 of tne Code is satisfied be use the proposal meets all of the requieements of the R-4,5 zone. =v 'e -4e4e b. Chapter 18.160 of the Cceie is satisfied becau ,e the proposal meets .•,,:,,. ...,...eee the requirements set forth for the submission ,isc\1\:::roval of a ;,','.'e.,:ifi.;.,-ii,t'e'e cb Chapter 18.164 of the Code will be satisfied durin the approval i:l'. SECTION it ( tNtallni144:eib' The City Council upheld the Planning Commission decision based upon the findings, and conclusions above, and appeovee ' i ,..'.', laie '',, of 8 1-86 subject to the following conditions: . 1 ',): g.., ,, 1 . UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, tALL CONIOITIONS SHALL 5E MET PR10R ,,'..' ....a TO RECORDING TH8 FINAL PLAT. ,. Standard half-street and full street lmptflvements ineludAno 1 ie r sidewalks, cUrbS, streetlights, driveway aprons, ,4Lorm OtainA00 1 i ',,;:, 1 and utilities (delete inapplicable items) shall be ihstalio‘i 1,'' , along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage. Said improvementb alono ., ,,,w.,,,it,,y standards including an 8 ft4 walk on the we$4t side and ee'et elit 1 ' ' '1'0, ''. 1%.:,0, to the alignMent of existing improvemente. (* note the L attached section which Was approved via KnOeland Estaeoe, .ri ''''' '''..."','''.'4t V ''' ap?tl r;f rw ''' L 4 ! i is h 0 �.1•u 1 I '.IA y JY+ u a n ',,$)M irk: +i wt'rte a r I t, r tl l `Jrt a k ,Pt1• �4, '�yPt, r41 ? t ; 6,1 ''',,''',',:4.,...',.''','';`,,', ',:'a `s ∎' 4YAl„ r ! i Y 1Vi''r,* '.1z,,,,,. n it ,t +J',y F+I tl u di 4 ,talN.'P r.0 :',1 � �' ,, Nu i �� f M, rely , a.... s , 0 4,:43 ,..,: ......, ,�1t n ti S 'N Y „ K � � 4R II,t a C a t ! ALL iy�I�+J A AY a 1' ,Y�1,4 ,, > � � M f 4., i 1 r .V ,„ eY Irye , , . . ) «r? Ir r A yµ�y� r, \ a ►� c • ,(1 ,U rw f rW '4.:::;'''';44;.'}',',7;',',,•;',:,i'...':?..';' r+tcilya 9 q;; �I IO..,,',,,,,,.',,,,,:,,,::,,.,,,..4:4„:,, . '1 111. 5 lm �rh ,t,-;,,,,.;,:,,,,,, ii �!l' U,' eµ < 1 x; • `'' .1; /4.:',-;,': ' 1 IX '?, t,,„ t rr vw I a� f 1 Fk .l '"IfMI' ;y 1tiA1 1 1 1,y f1,; A �a adµ'Sf�,< �'r�it�', ira,e alyt,� f�W y',,". ' M tl.Yt" I W ','-'-'4,':::,-.;'-',',.,-..-',':-11,-, �.. _. w 11.. t 1.:,,,,. n..:..i 1.. ,t. ,r;K.. nM1 a:;^.J i.h.. a -. �.__? ..�4 ..Rn k.��..I � �,.� � . .. •Ar ... an. �t F•y .!. ",V I': W 1.'Kt. i 4'.� to ..Y• I 1 r - �-.t...__�.7ha�.(-�z/ [t.r�ten.■r....�!'i�C� I �m p e �S�Y u C A'r� ~< ida/�,I 1ri 1 ;j rl t�G .,S � • a r.tt S �i e .r�� , �!t �7•us) i dd l�• .n ♦n.�t�y�u I rR tty�� '-' - ., ! .., bY: ,I.E`�a W x,y.. 'r"1 t',Ab .,�"."- a.r l�,.�,I r f .�n�T 1{�'txn W;k �r ': ___ _ . _- ___ ' b. policy 3.1 0,41.1. be satisfied provided that lAr.portions of the , Also, the wetlands areas on the site wil be evaluated as part of the ' ",.f,','';''''''e,.'"ee.'.'',,,,,-. required permit from the U.S. Army Ccrps of Engineers and the Division ..„. Policy 3'e2.1 will be satisfied becauso development within the 100 year ,.., 'f-.`',"'ee,,,,it... iY.00d pla1.2h,„ will be avoided. If any )1 the proposed street does 4 '1-,,...,,,c,,..,,,, encroach up6n the flood plain, a Sensitive Lands Permit will be required* V 1,,'ee*i'd%W,'e,e, d. policy 7.:',.2 c.;*n be met when additioial inf, emation, noted in the .: . Engineec4.1g Divi'Sion comments, is submitted and appropriate mitigation e -aae-,,eY, sewer facilities are available to the development. The applicant „:„. 4.7,..e,.ai'4,a*4 also indicates that theSe facilities will be provided within the a „Ht,..-'5,•, ,, subdivision as required by the Citi standards. , 1:i:■,,::::'7,CI;FY f- Policy 8.1.1 will be met onde the termination of Riverwood Lane „ at 92nd Avenue is justified (A. provisions for future extension to ,,,,epealae, g. Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied whn the conditions of approval relating ,, ile'e,i ,,,*"'-'.. WHEREAS, THE City Council has determi ed that the proposal is consistent '::;:'," ,,,f4.,i,:. with the relevant portions of the Community velopment Code based upon . \ i, ,''... :'..c4,,,e,:,;,e a. Chapter 18.50 of the Code is satisfied be use the proposal "meets c, .",:t.,:,":."":t.',6.:, b. Chapter 18.160 of the Code is satisfied becaU e the proposal meets the requirements set orth for the submission d apptoval of a :;1: !''',,..1',1.,;:1-1-'' c. Chapter 18,164 of the Code will be satisfied durin the approval (' t141E","1)44‘1;tt '441) : ",. 'e:e%,',' ,"'.'.e THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Is/T.... 4soi1/44). ofrp.pt. ..A.644,,;, It) 4."1-1-7k-A 414:1 ' SFCT1ON 1 : The City Council upheld the Planning Commission decision '4- ' It, ' .,,, based upon the findings, and conclusions above, and approvee .l'i' °) i', of S 1-86 subject to the following conditions: , .i,.1 .71„:1 :. 1 , UNLESS OTHERW1Se NOTED, .ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET 08101z , TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT. '.t.,, iii 2. standard half-street and full street imptovements Includino ,i, ",,,, sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, siorm dioioao0 ' ,;• and utilities (delete inapplicable items) shall be instAll0J ,,,,., along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage. Said improVemeots al000 SW 92nd Avenue shall be' beilt to (60' R/W, 36" Pvmt. ) cit % . %t'., :/:',1:'!.!',':,.i'', to the alignment of existing improvements. (* hotO tho.,! . vi,:.:P:''',.::%-'4,21, attached section which Was approved via Kotiland tstatot. , -- /;',!::',.,'.* .**,-,...(1! 1:; 3 , Sevehy.i,,0 sets of plan-profile public lie's'proemnt constructio j n ,...4,:t.... , i t,:l. ""' plans including a site grading plan an. cross sections and one 1 :A:-::::t (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered '■ 1 Professional Civil tn4ineer, detailing all proposed obi' i improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section fOte- a .aasaa 1 ae,..; ,,,., approval. ., . .. . ! i „ear, ,- oe'ea'ee' Is/ 4. Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profile details shall be provided 1 .a.,,,,ir. • ! a eesee-a as part of the public improvement plan, , 1 eleye 'ea; r4'4e,"1-',,:4 5, Slope easements along SW Riverwood Lane shall be provided to the . ,ees...;.e.sese• .i public. 0ocamentation shall be on City forms or on the plat and r ,,,,4',.. 4.!,,,.:H.4.4:: approved by the Engineering Section. 1 ta'' a...eliee 1 si7'6. The applicant shall provide a stormwater runoff report 1 i seeesa .s, I, addressin proposed onsite and offsite stormwater control aanid a soil erosion control (during and after construction) sd , aa rsport shall also address the impact of upstream drainage ene:eees, , facilities on the site and the mitigation of stormwater damage 1 ',,-,.':',e,,;:-•''''ae.1.` ! to the downslope City park and open space lands, aeliereee eee,ee-a- la/77. 1 'S''..... Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence '114eee''' Until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public , 1I ,,,.., : .,,,,:: improvement plans. The Sections will require posting of a 100% . ' ''''' ...„il'-;■.'t Performance bond, the payment of a permit fee and a sign , .,e4,',7,..,,,, a, a; , er -,..,... installation/streelight fee. Also, the execution of a construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or . concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvament . 'as .r,r. lbase eeeL, sses eae plans, SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT __GIVING MORE SPECI:rIC ' s..,:a ''. *..;,,,,', INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES BONDING AND AGREEMENTS, , ,es,roaa'ae , 8, SW Riverwood Lane will clnnect with Riverwood Lane ih the "'S' ' development to the west (Copper Creek). , 1 %S'else'a'a , ,., „0 4. '1, 9. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to :.he Public along , :itst-e‘le,",'1'.. the 8W 92,nd Avenue frontage to increase the riget-of-way to 30 , ea' e:e', , feet from centerline, The description for said deaoatioa shall . be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as ostablished . by Washington County, The dedication document shall be on City forms and apprcved by the Engineering Section, DEDICAllN roRms . AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSE!), , AJ4 4. Double frontage Lots 6,7,8j and 11 shall face 93rd Avenue and be ' restricted to only one access each on 0 same public roadway. - asta , , OD ,,,.. . ii , Lot #16 shall only have direct ACCOSS onto IN Rivarwood Lane, , J 4; * .1 12 , The applicant shall provide a traffic report indicating measures s al 4'1 to be applied to mitigate sight distance concerns, at the , :',..' W i intersection of River-wood Lane and 92nd Avenue, to the e mal . Enginooring 8oction, The Riverwood Lane easterly access shall . , 1 ..4- be addressed in conjunction with this study, ' , 1 13 . Lots 17 and 18 shall be deleted and half street improvements will not be required on the oast side of 92.nd Avenue At this . time. Half street improVemehts W] 11 be constructed at the time ' Lhat Lois 17 ad 18 are developed ; OR01NANC8 NO 86- 1 ,t s4,■•,,l,,,,%,04 4,atir.•".'," ,,.■ ,,,,,,,, ','?"",) ** ■V , :.-J,...A;',,,,• 1 I., A,.,''..el t ..,'-,1 .• C1' Pi"..,,''''''.414i. ' .., ...,' . ,'''1,, ,,,, ,'1 "1,°. t ,, .fa'•,,,',Y1 I . ee .1 ••• • .4 .,',,• :: ,Y..,.„1.eue i • 1,....,-.-.,,,,, 14 , River ..-,4 %., %ane shall be extended 10 92n ..,,4, nue wItn LHQ tikett.Iylt 1 4 i •'1,.,.' ; ,:i.".:•.4 '‘ •,', ','',It', criter .r ..-aoted in ltem #5 of the memo ,. d 4/3/86 from the city 1 ,0,.,.,;,,,,::5.,! ., !Engineer (Exhibit "A:) , will be addressed. Final apprcwal of street 1 ...,",- ',0ier,.e, e-:. .1 and parking design shaAl.be guanted by the City Engineer. . eeeee% 1 ,iie 15. The property shall be surveyed and the applicant shall dedicate .„,, .. 1 lands within the 100 year floodplain for greenway purposes. 1.4"•-•'+4■'I:'''' ',,,'''' 16, The necessary permits shall be ootained from the U.S. Army Corps et. , „ea.:, 1", ,„—,,,,,,, 4 1 -'..,4:::'''':' of Engineers and the Division of State Lands. The preliminary ., ,40.,.,,,,,,, ' plat shall be modified as necessary to accommodate the I k• ' a''''' $147,,L .,•';''''",•,;'..'.r' '''"'' condition(s) of approval granted Oy these two agencies. i .4•••''.•','''''",',.:' '.•,'„,",.,,:, ...;•,;•,,,,"",•': 17. If allowed through the permit process by the Corps of Engireers 1 . ..',i.',e.',.,•;",77r) and Divieion of State Lands, a footpath shall be incorporated ,•,.....,,,,-., ei., ) between Rverwood Lane and Cook Park, d •;',.,:.':•;.;,7,,,''''.7'...;;." 1:4'.'1,..',..:,?,:'''',',,`' , o" '!'..'..i:Ir:•.,:%;`,::::'*" /18. Street Centerline Monumentation 1 1...il',..r:::..;1;".'?a,,,,7 . .i, ,v.„.,• ....aiee a. In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2), the centerlines of ., ei$4.e..,1-.:. , all street and roadway rights-of-way shall be monumented before 1 '. ''.'4.''''''''). t the City shall accept a street improvement. .1 ze. '"?,',.'"';'.e ae :1 !•, "..‘q" .'1,,',' b. .1 ,ee,e,e,e- le All centerline monuments 'shall be placad in a monument box ,1 r. '•',".,,,,,,,,: conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument bones .. , , .,1Y-1 shall be set at Jesign finish grade of said street or roadway. , .7 ..t c, The following centerline monuments shall be set: :e-'et,a , ., (1) All centerline-centerline intersections. Intersections I et ., •'''':',:ri...",..1,"...,;:-. ereated with ' collector or other existing streets, shall be set 1 1.i,,,,,,li.,,7.",•:%'",. when the centerline alignment of said "collector' or other ., street has been established by or for the City: , 4 (2) Center of all cul-de-sac' . ■14,*:',,t:71'4%""'',..; ',,,, Arl'4,'°!''•°,' .'Pi•I'—'.V.It.;i• (3) Curve points, points of intersection (P I) when their ',k',:"•.,:i i'•',"ii'''."' pos:tion falls inside the limits of the pavement otherwise 1 ;'-'' — ''''''' '41 li'",1'72 ..,j'''',' • 4 beginning and ending points (13 C arid E C ) , 4 (4) All sanitary and storm location shall be placed in :1 poeitions that do ne)t interfere with centerline monumentation. 0• , , .., .,,:: iiiir9,,,,44frx..„'') ,...) A Sensitive t.ands Permit siTiall be required for any ortcroac.hmerit 1 i., 40:::0I into the 100 year fioodplain or construction in drairageways nt 0 .j 9,./10010'0,04 slopes over 25%. .. iiii ‘4,•-.', *, , 20. Lot 12 shall bo subject to the setback and height ..requiromont t .„ h. . fur flag lots contained in Sections 18.96.090 and 18 ,98 of the e IMIall • Code , ,.1 /21 . A tree cutting permit shall be obtained from the City prior 6.1 ... ...it 1 removing otny Lrees over 6 inches in diameter, 1, t, , . II OROINANI1E NO. 86 i, ,. I • 4..,1 , h,,, ,%., -,. ,.„,',. iri,,., ,..::..N% ,J,,l'e..:p» 1,'4.—t-. 1,,, . I ..'i.f ■Is...,, P'11' ' g ., ' ', 8 ` ° :, ',''r +,. ,.. i . ......,., -,,,,.,,, ., :' .`, i „'I'i'',:j' ,,,..-:4 , , . .4...''': 22. "Local Traffic Only" signs will be allowed at the entrance to the subdivision at 92nd Avenue. A - :' ," , tf,r, ' ,,,,:.,:t.A 23. The applicant shall create CC&R's compatible with adjacent c , ,,'•,..' -1.,''in• • subdivisions of Kneeland Estates and Copper Creek. .:.,f I 24. The applicant shall submit to staff for approval a rendering ,.' :74, ;:,•';',.,;,,e4,,, of a structure (for example but noC limited to a brick wall) to indicate that a driver is entering a neighborhood. ,,,,t,, Y2//.5. Lots 6, 7, 8, and 11 shall be part of Phase I ol' ..he project. ■' ,.7,,P...,,.1:r V/(6. After review and approval by the Planning Director and City Engineer, the Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington , County. 47. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the C. final decision date noted below. •,,,,' t.,-•, SECTION 2: It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of tl.:.e 1 ..-,4,,,,,,..i.,•t.4*•,. . entry of this order. , PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 47-rh day of May, 1986. ■04,° ''„f'' r, : ,t1L•,,,,,..e.,„ ',::4':;,.44i.■ ,.,■,,,ct. 1,',.' 4,,'„P"S : ' 6 • Deputy City Recorder - City of Tigard :,,,...-.4;,- ,,,,,,,,,...,,,,, APPROVED: This 7-7-14? day of May, 1986. .'1 ,------# a a, /gayoF - City of Tigard "--"'------- 4, .... . .J - 03 ,.; it/ „ ( ' , ',. 14.,44ik"C' '.'r ORDINANCE NO 86 - D. r L4ge ) S :y\1 0 to ,a-.4 , FIN � AL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST rr' ' Attach copy of submitted Plat 1 �4 . .v.i 6/' ...1 6rlils ,,., , Plat Name: A A � .� J ;`td W r � i I "CIRCULATE IN ORDER SHOWN" A'e4r/1124.4.2 1 // , , PLANNING DIVISION I,, .wf'� I, b a r 0 o r t:.� `,,, �' ',." Review items considered W Y. wa� is 14,.';',.;.,-4?„,,,,„,;,..* 1 i '' 1. Phase boundaries L''1 �tarrr .�ti �I 1 d' tf `i lr r ,-' 2, Lot and/or tract size and configuration E ,It', j} t t/ 3. Lot and/'or block numbers CA a ti y4r, w" a+,. s ,,,�;°+ f 4. Access rests ictions— vi �otnt1C" 4-`. '011-1,44-'1 A--' / r� 17� 8. Y,i of 2'0..4' a+ rr � �. 1 :, '".0„,,,A, Conditions of Approval - t� ti t'4..":,"0 ,.' '' .t' ` „, 6. Private streets (location, width, etc, , . ) Doll W t �'. ,w 7. Preliminary Plat approval date - 1 year period OK f . 1 4 1 w --'o.l 1 "%:, -','''y r r. „. 7t��+, S. Special Deed restrictioru I 11 Y }6 .,-.-,4-,r"�� wfu 4, Taxes, special, asser.3sments paid [.1 t6,r+J wy 4 ,+�+,, .,tti' + ' , fl 10, Open Space (Deed or Dedication) ” i . . i o .� ,r, ,t ,,• .Rw 6y'' r 11 . Noll—Remonstrance Agreements OA] ,, wa } w...• '..,..e..,,,,..-....y , 12. SPECIAL SETBACKS ARE t. 4 '. a t. J .s, ,a u1ro, ' ., Comments:-45-c ice. '�.11. a 'f" 'L.�. � ' .5 tao i,. - x. ,.;, ',...0 U l el> A 111 t 1, ) 10 144,58, a r • 12. - t AJ to 4";145'4j 44-' ' I 4)ti" C''''t)11--11,5, At...P3) 1.1 1.0 ( /15 2'51 .51...cop 'S 7 L ir, DATE; i 4 w .6161+r Y q ita l :4-i , of p "...-',"1, , r ',. '', 1' !:. •,''r.:M' Nr.. ("-,;.. «M *r :sn.-rd 1 ,1,,,',‘ ±7 '+'' 'fie, t•0 ,'+1. M14, . r:n. .t 7, 1 S',...7 , y r .7'.' t r ,�,L... 1;: ENGINEERING DtVtStON 4 v A. + xl� '' • Review item:$ considered ,, ' '' Survey Related i'If ry�i r"w t ' + .,,,f ' . P t unary description E 2';:1'„�.� b ,,�' 2• Lot a,nd tract square footage calculation check i\i/ ,, tra l , .J. y y,1 ,, ;, 3 , Centerline monumentatio o i . ,,,,,.,:o '"u+ }'C' 4 Bearings, distances and curve data (i.:,3-y ; „` Y.r-,,i �. � Y~= ,' Comments f .5 �►C�1 '° ,4.,..., r 4 A ,:,,,,,,,:: «�1 1 ,4 : ,ii{Sy +:114A"--- t aril . , i k x 1: 9 By: +.r„ s,r'"•�-•' /[ A�,.+ ....,,_,.:,�,•••� w�».r.:,, f Sti rr '. DATE: ,...�,,,+ 1A ''.i r ..,.,( - -+,..,,�.-•""�`.,,./ , ,,1 , t* t.„-Al .. ', Engineering Related ,t w'a d.tt eJi (� a{ N p`µ,ti r1 ir r1' 'l o i { ,a Location, width and purpoee of easemr ens, convey nce. 'fv, e. [ 3 .4 /,,,,,,, #,; (Specific nd general public utility easements) 0+, t ao )s, 504,14. 1 vi e.1.1 a''5 G, F.` . .4.4-.44,-....,,, f a..� + l f. 01 u 4i `' 4G `'7 1.,:l f / � W� , ., .--,--tr 3 '2.'+'"'"'''. M w 1 o • Reserve s strips Y 1�� .+ J11/ /Y+3 J' i� » - A. .R [ ,..1.---------c'''-- :74,,,1' . ,!'” f';sy rr°�,r' 7. Open Space areas,, public improvements l wu Y' ''.41., a $r4, O. Curve, corner, an cul-de-sac radii .1 ... .d, E �,� ,,K ..,:„ 4 6 11 ISM i ,,j,' a 9. Street Names ,��s \ � ,.,,. 47."6� d4,' » ti t:r �,—[- .-- [.a', '' 10. Dedication/Vacation 11. Street location, width and alignment (Et .^ tt- —&-3— i 12, Public ( 'r t �1 j rg � 'te a t i ,` 3, Conditions of Approval (`.,,',. . R4' S �w� w�,-z)''%tor E.,. ,.R,.+ L:,', ea C [ 4 ,i 14, Sewer availability letter prepared 'a. V I. (14.--✓'' r I, X11 e. '., 'T 15. Non-access areas marked on attached plat ',/ , cor, " �° �N Comments: ., ":1$ a r * ,:ASS:1,, ar ,• aI 10 t t VM.tit. w it) w "tea awMa,'t',,,,; �y1i.,.. .l' ,, p 17V r �`' ..,W”' ''' 1 '' ` a �. r...�+�+.�• �' (�"�� _._ it�.. � -�... ;,UtA��.�V, �.0 '1a ',.' ��1 � •t- 1 � w �7, i_h.T n^n�"P'•"�i�wl.�i,� w, "r$ 6". ry. _el' rye p4 *0.1; :. C'11 Z 1.E 1 '� C 4.. _ � ��r, ,t ter.. ., • _ d.,r y r. .0 Y:': a wA.' ._,..h . .4 "" P 112 t, .+ '171., l -' r '',.;:t!, . . yn _ � _ - ' ,LI-_w li'pt.�Cc r 4 ,"%_,' h k�umi.ry.«.+� ., "k w'. ....0%,� f� .<�i�,+ 'qY �t�x� it Si.%411'44' i"+�" F' ::,,'',..,','•,,:,:,',...k: -,`,.4*): ______ • , ', - , .,, .,.... - ,..'., ,,;, .,',,,!,,,,,,-,!•,,, '',,,,. .,;!,,it.:'',',,,'';.,:',..:;i',..1,,,'C'„;,',,',,,',-'',,,,,,ii,v1r,-.;;,',,',4,r2.:.,i,J,,,:',t.:,.y,,,:l.",,,,;.50,,,',,,,,, ,,,,I,',,.;;,,,,.:', :4,,:',"44.:::''''',7.'''''' 444.; IS.'1,‘,, 1'‘4';'‘4.1 ',*'i'''1 14 0, 4!,,'''''':'; 4. ■ V.:,,64 ''41''.''. f: ■ 1.4 ' ,I 4: ,...•;., '.;',1-:'',!.::',":K..-:. , . . BUILDING DIVISION ,, , Comments ,,,,, ,,,...%.,.w...;-. ..,. '.,:'-''',,,,,i,;:',i'',,,.:7,-1:,7,-,.; ',t2,',,:i...:,,?:!:,Ii''''fiii::::'°':"..'1 ;',..!";:,,,'",t,:.".,';'..4*,, ', BY :"::',,,,:.::•.: ,,',.1„;..?''','J',,,..,. , .,„,„,,,,,,,,,„. ....,.,1.t.... ,..,,,..,;,„„ DATE: 4 ..,,4'`, ',,'•.,.,:'.: ,,, 1 1 I t.,,,;':%:',,',.?,..c.,;:..;„ Returned to Developer for correction BY , i ,s,k..';',,'',..';'::::: ,..,,;:,t,,,..,....-.:',.. ..Arp.....,.....2..1.14.____,_, eve!, 7 DATE: '......:"),t.,.. ,:' Corrections reviewed and approved 6Y _____ ...s2.......____ :.,)t!--,:,,,,g,.,..,,,,..,,,.,:.. DATE !':...,7.,;',". ,''' , .'''''..!., I,.".;:jr:,7. Forwarded for City Signatures BY: , ,!,,,./,,,,„,•;:ft,',.:,',"..,,, DATE: , 4-0, . a . ,..:-;3'1,•,,,i),',.....,::::,•:,,,,, ,. _ ,:,,:::,i•,.-„.„,....',...,,,,,..,,,,:, ,,,,::,,.,,,f,,,,,,,,,,,., • ,,,„,.,, Addressed - BY •:.,,,, ,,,,,,:iv,..;,.'. DATE --_ --.. ....:La..Z..."a7.--:L.............._____ (Forwarded to drafting) ,...— Released to developer for recordina ., OY :::':''''''",,,1:7',;4?■:;,1' It :■ ■I's ,:* DATE:. 4— -a .,-„,,,__ _E.:17..--_____ (RSCtbs/2367P) ''i ....i. '''' ■,.., ,..... ., 'ii',,,:■,,,..,'';''''.,■''',..:ti , , -,,41:._ .,, ko: ,,A, ,,,,' ,,,,, ,',,:A,;;.„, ) ,,,'.1 LI k1,*,,,l-.:, ,",: -,.,,,,,,,,.",:-. ;.,:-.,.: s I:'I,-•.4. .,‘,:_,,L, '._,,.. ',,,'.' ..,,,,. . , , , . , .. , ,, 1/4, ., r yt.1,'.1L3.'W.Y.,:.1'-.!a.ti•}.1.f.i.w1:.L 1.x...1sa,Jw"1'w.. iw...5.:ra.:l.xr.1.,.'.iwYtw 1..•..wr:\. r.1 r'A.'1..t,J.ltu x.: .1,i:.'-4',i:}.A.1.r,U.rw}.rr.•:J..r.... ww 1.k.:dr.a.M..t.1...x..w.tia.u.4...W9ra[:...r.+:4rJr.l.....+.a.x,r.w.:lw....i..+uu, 41/ :E7.„1„) CITY OF TIGARiD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY y .•�:• AGENDA OF: ae_.tember 8, 1986 AGENDA ITEM 0 DATE SUBMITTED: , :,•..; ,; Auc,�ust �r� 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION.. Passed Resolution ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Kneeland Call in For Public Hearin � r. wrrrrrr__rwwrwrw___ gst;ties Subdivision Easement & „ PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson R--0—W Vacation public Hering , REQUESTED BY: Lincoln Saving Loan__ DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Council initiated Street 'Vacation request -- consistent with Council policy adopted by Resolution No. 85-30. ` INFORMATION SUMMARY On July 28, 1986, Council passed Resolution No 86-06 to call for a public hearing on Council initiated request to be held at 2:00 PM on 9/6/86. .gaff requested a Council initiated vacation to vacate utility ease► ents and a road ' right—of—way portion in Kneeland Estates Subdivision: No objections were filed by utility companies nor Washington County, however, General Telephone Company and Portland General Electric requested a 6—foot utility easement be f. . , retained along SW 93rd Avenue. This is accomplished by a reduction in the •'. area to be vacated and the ordinance, legal description, and map reflect this --"a modification, Planning Commission and the Engineering Division have recommended a roval. The hearin g pp g was published in the Tigard Times according to City and State requirements and all abutting and affected ••� City q abutting property owners M have been notified by mail. All fees will be y paid by Lincoln Swings & Loan • A , - x prior to recording of the ordinance .. ,gyp .... .... _. 1 Ui 4 y; . w w,n..wrk wrrrrrw• """'""""'""""".."""."."""'""""""""r"."'"""'""' ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED, 1. Approve vacation request as shown. iD 2. Apv°ove vacation request with amendments. 3. Re&.uest staff to prepare resolution denying proposed vacation based on ► objections and remonstrances received during the public hearing C9 4 µ nn....n... M-. i�� '.rrr..nuama.w n'••wr.w.�.w.�n P.UGGESTED ACTI IU !' 1 Staff recommends alternate In. Motion to approve ordinance as presented BFI lw/3967A ;w w 6 • • , . 411) 41) CnY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO 86- AN ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY EASEMENTS AND A ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA WITHIN KNEELANO ESTATES SUBDIVISION AND DECLARING AN EFFFCTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to Section 15.08.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the reason and purpose for this vacation is to comply with a Land Use Decision Condition to allow replatting of a portion of the subdivision; and WHEREAS, the vacation is recommended by the Planning Commission and the City ".".e Engineer with conditions; and WHEREAS, in accordance with ORS 271.100, and TMC Section 15.08.110, 'the Council fixed a time and place for the publie hearing and the Recorder published notice and posted notice in the area to be vacated; and WHEREAS, notice has been mailed to all property owners abutting said vacation area and all owners in the affected area, as described in ORS 271.000; and WHEREAS, the Council, having held a hearing on September 8, 1986, finds the public interest will not be prejudiced by the vacation as provided by ORS 271.120 and TMC Section 15.09.130,1 and WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is in the public interest to approve the request to vacate the utility easements and a road right-of-way area area within said subdivision because the public interest wiI not be prejudiced; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that the following conditions are necessary to vacate said land and that the first condition will require a reduction in the area to be vacated and this is reflected in the attached Exhibit "A". The A conditions shall Fe: A 6-foot wide general utility easement shall be adjacent to SW 93rd I. Avenue as requested by General Telephone Company and Portland General Electric. The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this ' ordinance and it shall not be effective Until a certified copy of this ordinance ha "aen recorded with the Washington County Clerk, Assessor, and Surver. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS Sect/on 1: The Tigard City Council hereby orders the vacation of that portion of utility easuments and certain road right-of-Way areas within Kneeland Estates Subdivision as described on the attached Exhibit "A" and shown on the attached EXhibit "B", and by this reference made parts hereof. ORDINANCE NO. 06- Pagel 1W/3967A 'I' 4, . • • ....... .ut. , • fa : Section t 2: The Tigard City * Council further orders that the vacation be o the following conditions A 6—foot wide general utility easement shah be adjacent to SW 93rd - Avenue as requested by General Telephone Company and Portland General Electric. The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this 0...� m � ordinance and it `shall not be effective until a certified copy of •' this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk, Assessor, and Surveyor. Section 3: In no situation shall this ordinance be effective until the 31st day after its enactment by the City Council and approval by the Mayor. - . PASSED: by vote of all Counc9i.1 members present after - beir g read by number - and title oniy, this - day of , . 1986 .= ,- i Loreen R. Wilson, Acting Recorder APPROVED: This day of �..�.. , 1986. ,� John E. Cook, Mayor 4 01101 VZ - L J A� ,-,,,, 0 i '; .. ORDINANCE WO. 06�-. A' i lw/3967A " r . / EXHIBIT UeAI* • These easements lie in the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as: .: 3tl= Roadwa Easement That certain 30 foot strip of land running exactly parallel to and south of the northerly property line of Lot 127 Kneeland Estates No. 2, a recorded Plat, Washington county Plat records, bounded on b the west by the westerly property line of said Lot 127 and on the •' east by a line 6 feet westerly and parallel of the easterly property lino of said Lot 127. Said easement was provided for :-= ingress and egress. 5! Utili Easement P�lon3 „Lot 128 y_ • IrMl�Ww� M.�ssKY• YY, IIM1wMY , `LK P That certain 5 foot strip of land running exactly parallel to and north of the southerly property line of Lot 128 Kneeland Estates ;• No. 2, a record Plat, Washington county Plat records, bounded on the west by the westerly line of said Lot 128 and on the east by a line 6 feet esterly and parallel of the easterly property line of said Lot 128. Said easement was granted for � • utilities. '� public u1 �.l�.t�®�, 1 Utility Easement an Lpt 135-136 Beginning at a point 5 feet northerly of the northeast corner of Lot 136 said Kneeland Estates No. 2; said point of beginning being on the easterly property line of Lot 135, said Kneeland Estates ,, No. 2; thence westerly along a line exactly parallel to the north line of said Lot 136 to a point 6 feet east of the west boundary of said Lot 135; thence parallel to said westerly boundary 10' southerly along the west boundary of said Lots 135 and 136 to a point 5 feet south of the north line of said Lot 136; thence 5"; easterly along a line exactly parallel to the north boundary line thence, northerly on said earterl boundary line, 10 feet to ry line of said Lot oY►t 13 ;.� y y � e of said Lot 136 to the. easterly boundary .;� point of beginning. Said easement was granted for public utilities. Revised August 26, 1986 Engineering Division 1w/3967A a r ' ,-- LEGIBILITY STRIP {. , _ - .. _ ,x - • - . • ;, - s 810 w .. 32 - - ..___ - d.:0. V 90.RIEx ZOO ' L:.4 - x , 7 4 2U lO • ._ 15200' ,,. p sa, As.aS >4 a= ".912.42 4-g.'a 4 SA. nu e?. 1520.�: �; i§A4. 11500 11-"sA i !�OG` ! t� 400 3 g 11 i. R' 1.1?' LF.6:Ae.. 'o A A .33sta: 2t fie: . '.ATE:, ill* g r = 1'1700 4. .... ''0132. 1�_� a' =c or' > 1'51.00 a - _'' .r s.13800 ,J:` 200 Z°' :r. __ _ .is. -� $ -UTIUT EASEMENT` ` _ :� .�SAc �r !8J_ > , i ' : . . .. i 1'1 ' �_, ' L `` r„te 30 q -Fir; mss'' Z'>3 tK. !3 2s i • '� INGRESS,/EGRESS.4� • !ti7 f v, luaocs 1000 :0) ,. b 135 UTILITY EASEMENT. t�...t15 ofs. b' - o 114 _�1 e'' _ 's ss:ss • �`_ 11:t001 -r '.�� SCHOOL cisTRICT 23J 36 51 ,dTi $i� ..:12700,, 12600`12500 12400 ' 12300 1'2200. 12100 r ._ 142':3 s `14800 ..7:......,12e)':_:_ 1211 122's 23 124 „ 125-x 825 a -1P.r i a��t►, co so sa ess4 433 p 1 H, g ' 13y sz°s °�° �'b` St easas o so :w �. rs.1 2_` -*-- a4sLrr STREE i A'saass•� so usa `4s:e4/� r,,'', .6:.. i R m �� z 1°6°° 1t3T00 1°6°71:0500- 1*-e`-2 0 10100 2' 1•' ° °: 4317 ZY 44 9 is _ �`p, s� < �? Mis s5�=. 1314 4 1 r as;I ', 13400 .. La :=- 76 - f= 78! 79- 1 v 8& = ,- 83 T 14£00 128 1 13000 !`2 113 S �,' .- ego so�i alms ,�.. 9 11':} Qd19 , « 4134 4314 - _ 103- �,w 'i;f0• ..93- - 43 43!. 43 v= 13v11Z Q 2 9�3e MARTHA Hi 6d i. G.. 0 . ,r-- 4_33. 43 43 43 49 4Rad oG - 112 .142200 •6,14100 3 14000b" 13600 92 °$ • 3 <, ?: 1°8: >' 1°T 41 13-es. s ill a -,a_. 9500 -zit.* see � :coo(). ...Pe-13900 105 1� /093Q4 103:34 w r . r ..N.. 1 4 -� 13800 , 0a 2f'2+ , '1- 10�3R 13700 m*91 ' 9 ' 1 ! gip,a• .es$' ..8S1 f - ii. a' '2.14 47 49 �. 110 ® a "` - 104• - 14 - A 4 �: dd17' AA�O b : 1 . , 144110-10. i• \4- JULIA -i LACE w<e a 11&5Y 24.37' ILO , Y . „. l Pi • 8 �, ICC� --t 4 $ ,.T, - - 4 1200 2 1202 1201 -_ ` 105 ,�;. 'LK 3a,. 3o -34.23 . +' .32 a .50Ae. .2s!cr ��. SCALE 4 84• 4300' 14 1.x@00 1510 ply �g if ; ' . fr," 13 1 !°Ty/�'a o. "..� �y w w d °p 9itdV�yg g i►�32 r ( ,p ' +r . + ,,4 101. 2 100 : � ' .p 9 i -,;.u. 1� 7J. A 3 p .- ;IIR:. �°f iir 60E. .'° ."hG$0 1.049' s$ - s . 'G ! Si33- 3[30 •32.93 34 at a.a.- Wen t� r - J. L. . g . I .. C 410 ' , 1.- "•' : V , - r MEMORANDUM - ,• • , .- . ., , A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON , . ... . 4*- , . TO: Mayor and City Council August 26 1986 -.'::•,.. . .-,, . . •• " - - FROM Randy Clarno, Engineering Services Manager • . „ - ., ,. . SUBJECT: Vacation Report - Kneeland Estates ' '--; , ,. . V , No 2 Subdivision Roadway and Utility Easements . : • • 4 .., ' 4 i . . 4 The Engineering Division recommends the vacation known as "Kneeland Estates No 2 subdivision. roadway and utility easements" be approved with one condition. The one condition being the retcinage of 6 foot • wide general utility easements, adjacent to S.W. 93rd Avenue as re- lid quested by General Telephone Co. and Portland General Electric. This condition can be accomplished by reduciAg the area to be vacated and _ modifying the legal descriptions. The revised descriptions are attached for your review.lo -Ole_ ov-divia.Pte--e.. , • . . ,,, .., The Engineering Division recommendation is based on the following - ... , findings ,.. .. . . a) There is no effect on traffic, pedestrian or bicycle circulation. No response was received from fire or .., ,. . . 0 police relative to response time, . • -. • • 1-v. b) Drainage in the area can be adequately provided for . . . • __ without use of public easements in the vacation area . : c) Utility company responses were received and addressed . ... J. . as stated above. d) The proposed vacation is not contrary to the Transpor- 4. .:- . • tation element of the Comprehensive Plan; and e) The vacation is not contrary to the Capital Improvement Plan. ' - Reviewed and Approved: `..' ›. -I ,..--- --3 ' Randall R. Wooley Deputy Director/City Engin r Community Development . . . x.:... • A 340 TO: Loreen Wilson, City Recorder August 26, 1986 E FROM Keith Liden, Senior Planner "'"" RE: Roadway and utility easement vacation/Kneeland Estates • • The Planning Division has no .objection to the proposed vacation request. However, a utility easement may need to be retained to accommodate development on Tax Loy`. 700 to the west. The Engineering Division should address this issue. Also, attached is a copy of the Planning Commission minutes from .August 5, 19860' recommending denial oi: the ingress/egress Vacation,' .h .r .A. N .'�". a 1 y .j! 4. � .c•.. , ..�.^`1,A... �a. .1 i.. ... N... ` .1 . . . 410 410 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 5, 1986 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:40 PM. The meeting was , held at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall Room - 13125 SW Hall Blvd 7igard, Oregon, • ROLL CALL: 'nc:$F1"" ,Jident Moen; Commissioners Owens, Butler, • Peterson, Leverett, and Newman. • ABSENT: Commissioners Vanderwood and Newton, ' STAFF Senior Planner Keith Liden, Secretary Diane Jelderks, Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart. 4 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to approve . • minutes as submitted, Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present Commissioner Newman abstained. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION • ..• o Reviewed memo to attend Oregon Planning Institute - Commissioner Butler will be attending on Thursday and Friday; Commissioner Owens will attend on Friday. - • o Bonnie Owens will be the Planning Commission representative for the ? Transportation Committee. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5,1 SUBDIVISION S 14-86, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT M 16-86, VARIANCE V 13-86 NPO N 3 ALBERT (' D VIRGINIA MISTEREK LOCATED: 14420 SW 114th Avenue. . e The applicant requested this item be set over to the August 19, 1986, - public hearing. Preeident Moen moved and Commissioner Newman seconded to set the item 5,1 ovor to the August 19th Planning Commission heaeing. a. ' Motion carried Unanimously by Commissioners present. DC 0 5 2 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 486, SUBDIVISION S 12-86, SENSITIVE LANDS SL 7-86, • ZONE CHANGE ZC 7-86 - NPO # 7 - SPECTRUM PROPERTIES, INC. Request for a Zone Change from R-12 to R-12 PD (Residential, 12 units per' 11•361 acre, planned deVelopment), to subdivide the property (6.3q acres) into 16 110 lots from 5,000 to 7,000 sq ft. and for a SensitlAie Lands Permit to a construct half street improvements within the 100 year f10od plain, Located: North side of SW North Dakota approximately 5601 east of SW 106th AvenUe (WCTM 1St 34DA lo3 100). Senior Planner Liden explained how this item had been set otivr from the July 8th hearing. The six Commissioners where split three to three on whether to approve or deny the request. Discussion folloWed on how to * " best proceed. The applicant was not present and staff had not heard from them. 01. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 5 1086 , sage 1 , . , ... . (1) 410• ul' ' . . • • '-* PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 0 Discussion followed regarding the types of subdivision which the Planning , Commission would hear and which subdivisions the Hearings Officer would •,-. . ,.- hear and the reason for the change. o President Moen was c)ncerned that subdivisions which have a major impact .7,..- to a neighborhood should still be heard by the Planning Commission. .e. , Further discussion followed. „---1 * Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward a ,;..... . recommendation to City Council to Amend Section 18.33.090 of the Community ... ..,,, Qevelopment Code to allow the Hearings i Officer to hear straight subdivisions and the Planning Commission would retain approval authority . . over subdivisions with a variance or a planned development. Motion , . carried by majority vote. Commissioners Moen and Peterson voting no. . . . , Commissioner Newman abstained. d'AJL..., OTHER BUSIN - - o Kneeland Estates No. 2 Easements Vacations, 30' Roadway and 11 — 5' * : - . . utility. Senior Planner Liden explained this request is the result of a Lot Line Adjustment request and approval. The Owner of Tax lot 700 % 4 supported the request as he has a letter from Washington County approving 1 an access onto Durham Road, * Commissioners expressed concern for an additional access onto Durham Road, ' especially since this easement exists. Consensus of the Commission was to . ... deny the vacation of the ingress/egress, however, if necessary the location could be moved. The 3 — 5° utility easements may be vacated. Commissioner Newman moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to forward the consensus of the Commission as a recommendation to City Council. .-, o Genesis # 2 Easements — Lot 48, 10' Slope and Utility Easements, Senior Planner Liden explained that he was not famt/iar with this request and did ' not have additional information, - , Consensus of the Commission was for staff to have more information — available for the City Council and Commission would support City Council's decision, ..- ...' 7, MEETING AD3OURNED 8:45 PM Diane M. Jelder . , Secretary ATTEST vetr / 4 relee,u ' 0174 - ,fr --a-0ot - _ ._. A. Donald Moen, President dj/100 PLANNING COMMISSION- MINUTES August 5 1986 Page 5 . . r Alt MI 0 „, FIioCE'Y _Y j� MAY 28 1986 4 1 Gil OF TIGARD .. BEFORE' T LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS •e++� OF THE STATE OF OREGON a 3 SALLY ARROYO, GUY and DIANA MOUNT and MARCH AND GAIL KELLY, ) rY 4 Q Petitioners, ) LUBA No. v. ) 6 iPe .,. .,. CITY OF TIGARD, ) r e tdo Respondent 8-r:: : NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAL 10 Notice is hereby given that petitioners intend to appeal the land use decision of respondent entitled as follows: ^ •4 CITY OF TIGARD ; ° 13 (A THE_ MATTER OF TH 14 (APPLICATION FOR r t� FINAL ORDER IN THE PLAT (APPROVAL REQUESTED BY LINCOLN SAVINGS 15 (AND LOAN, FILE NO 51-86, UPHOLDING THE ORDINANCE NO 86-22 (PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL WITH R '. 16 (MODIFICATIONS, ENTERING FINDINGS ANT? (CONCLUSIONS �, 17 8 The decision, which became final on May 7e 1986, '''''.!'4.:;', involves a decision of the Tigard. City Council to uphold a 19 decision of the Planning Commission approving a preliminary plat application for an eighteen (18) lot subdivision on an 8.68 acre 21 parcel within the City of Tigard. t 22 m. III 2 Petitioners are represented by Edward J. Sullivan of 24 Q' Sullivan, Jo selson, Roberts, Johnsen & <loos, 53 S.W. Yanhill, 25 Portland, Oregon 97204, tel: (503) 228-1455° ''' 26 Lincoln Savings s and Loan, was represented Applicant, g '� Page a i- SULUVAIJ,JoSSEL5oW,ffoBERTS,Jo isoI ti.~too5 , gftorne�y Ltioi tit 5 S.WA YamH t)I Street 7n1 phnn®9803 o 204 ) ?2847.1X55 V <: ., ............. ..... ,.. •.«..... • ,,. .. may.: ,,,.. ...,.. ......, .. 1i... ; Y • t i•. .. , ... •I, ..r-, .. (111) la, . ...„ -., • • -• ...i - , . 1 below by Norm Harker of Aloha Engineering, 1750 SW Skyline Blvd. , '. .. .!, . ..,,. , , . ... .., 2 Portland, Oregon 97321, tel: (503) 292-9774. • . . -,. 3 Respondent, City of Tigard, has as its mailing address ‘ve-; - . • 4 and telephone number: P. O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, . - . .. ..- . . (503) 639-4171, and has, as its legal counsel, Mr. Timothy ,,. • . . . .., ...,;;.,,• 6 V. Ramis, O'Donilell, Ramis, Eliot and Crew, 1727 N.W. Hoyt, . -• . - .. •,,,. . -• 7 Portland, Oregon 97209, telephone (503) 222-4402. 8 Other persons mailed written notice of the land use ..,... ,,-. ,,.. • ,.. •- 9 decision by City of Tigard, as indicated by city staff in this -., ../.., 10 matter, include: .- , .. . .. ....• . -..- ...' .-.. 11 David Homma Don Mangellie 16520 SW 93rd 16415 SW 93rd •.- • . • 12 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 . , --••• '„ 13 Phil Pas NPO #6 Chair Dan Leslie 8935 SW Pinebrook St. 9540 SW Riverwood Lane • , Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 . . . 15 , Lincoln Savings & Loan Guy Mount III 10250 SW Greenburg Rd. 9500 SW Riverwood Lane . • 16 Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 . -e 11 Liz Collins Sally Arroyo _ . , . v. 16545 SW Copper Creek Cr. 9505 SW Riverwood Lane . .1 • • . 18 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 ,., . . . . . . - - 19 Norm Harker Alpha Engineering IL ' 20 1750 SW Skyline Blvd. . — • Portland, OR 97221 1-- ., 0) 21 NOTICE: • 1.- 22 L ....4 '. fill Anyone designated in paragraph II of this Notice other •• CD ' 23 .• Lu ., ....1 ' than respondent City of Tigard who desires to participate as a 24 party in this cage before the Land Use Board of Appeals must file 25 with the Board a Statement of Intent to Participate in this .. . 26 . . , proceeding as required by OAR 661-10-020. The Statement must be 4 . . Page 0• ; SULLIVAN,JOSSELSON,ROBERTS,..10(-11,15014&KLOOS Attorneys at Law 53 S.W.Vanilla!Street Portland,Oregon 97204 't • .. ••., Telephone(503)228-1455 1;6.'1' r."*.: b;- • • 1 filed with the Board within 15 days of service of this Notice. • 2 P:e pf ctful1y submitted/ 3 SULLIVAN, JOSSELSON, ROBERTS, 4 JOHNSON & KLOOS Y.ii per. V , 7+ . - won Edward J. Sullivan, OSB #69167.x.._ - °' Of Attorneys for Petitioners n 7 J .I. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE . 9 Thereby certify that on May 27, 1986, I served a true 10 and correct copy of this Notice of Intent to Appeal on all 11 persons listed in paragraph II, pursuant to OAR 661-10-010(8) , by : 12 first class mail. • 13 Dated: May 27, 1986. 14 ,» w By • 15 Edward 5e Sullivan, OSB #69167 Of Attorneys for Petitioners •' 16 17 CERTIFICATE OF FILING .' 18 I hereby certify that on May 27, 1986 I filed the 19 original Notice of Intent to Appeal, together with one copy rt. Zo : thereof, with the Land Use Board of Appeals, by personal 21 delivery. F a�A 22 Anted: May 27 186.uji By 1 ..: Y ..: 24 E.:i,Aw'ard fu11ivan, OSS E 7 Of Attorneys for Petitioners 25 26 Page � sUitIVAi ,JossstsoNti Roat rs,JOHNSON&ktoos Attorneyll at Lc W 51 S W.I.Yc fr h0%h'ili Stre0®�" TPoodt,lhnti+CS03 1o2∎!9O72455 ,.: ♦ J 2 :' CORPORATION r/17 - , • - a . ' STREET MID/CATION � KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Rainier Bank Oregon, V.A. • do hereby dedicate to t he a perpetual right-of-way for street, toad and utility purposes on, over, across, under, along and within the following deacr'i ed real property • .: ..' in Washington County, Oregon: : ' SEE REVERSE SIDE ; • To have and to holethe above-described and dedicated rights unto the Public s ' ' •''- forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. grantor(s) hereby .y are the owner in fee simple and the property isfreeo€ all liens and encu brancea, they ha ve good\and legal right to grant their rights above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. - ' The amount paid for this dedication is t No amount is,due from City. See Attached agreement INWITNESS WHEREOFdetail. k g ';: �,• WHEREOF, ,...e undersigned corporation has caused this Street Dedication • A to be executed by its duly authorized, undersigned officers acting pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors. : ,. NOTE: Upon approval and acceptance by City Rainier Bank Oregon, N.A. • Council, return to Rick Caffall Naine of p Corporation at Rainier Bank Oregon, phone � number: 293-7157. • . $ . ,�,/i �,� 1)O NOT SEND FOR RECORDING 4'-:oaf.314.!P, '~l '` -,>"= r c oral' ' ,:e.i7.4.,v... ,rowAlimiL460A00, a a .,. a STATE OF OREGON ) ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) Auauil l Personally appeared Tim Patrick and Richard S. Caffall who, each being first duly sworn, did say that the former is "...' the Vice president and that the latter is the ; - -. :. . e ..•a•a.�.ertt • -- ,...�.�.J gctobamoc.of r,•, , - ..,:., N , a corporation, and that the seal affixed to "` '' -• the foregoing instrument . is the corporate seal of said corporation and that said instrumentai��aas signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its board . . ..... , ,off ddir1e tors;r`rnd,each of them acknowledged said instrument to be its vol:*ntar act and • :yIVgint 'd 104Y 111HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal. this 21st day ' :y,� of �' _:-8i�.5ust` r , 19 87 •, T n 1.# D w-7`' Lary' 1. 4.�'. ■ .«:� ,' '�,�, 11'2,, ..le� Jua,°o r1e� �� is for Oregon ', ,f: `� ) My Comm yaeion Expitres 3.27 88..._...._.x.. l , i s/- Approved'"e's1°I!'o�legal description this ZC�- _ day �"1 ♦ By; A kl 1. b'''''' =—,. . CO j C �` <-LEI' e r— Approved this _____ day of rL 19 r17. 0 t F COMMUNITY DEV,LOPRENT � �EPAR�ILN �' By: t,.. 4.--i- r,a_ _'' w 217?�4/24A Title: r�'T � ! c�r'� _•c,• .� Return recorded Original . � to: • r• CITY Y RE C V DEU l • ern 011 I O ' P.0.110X 23397 `°' T1GARD;OR 972x? , . • .•• . 1 .. ''t •1 1,• . • 111 _ ' . 1• 11 n ... ' ••i• •.,1,;..:....r� —..+1.•f:,.:...a�.•.11..".4VY1•. ..... • , `';,Ir .... ,. IA/....1+..1.w../.W1 . ..u•lr. ... i. .....vl...• 1. u4) • „. Land Surveyor . EXHIBIT A' 4235 S.E.Division St. Phone Portland,OR. 97206 ' (503) 236-4646 , Job No. 87-16 • July 181, 1987 • 1 . . Legal Description; A tract of land situated in the N.B. 1/4 of Section 14, T 2S, , � R 1W, W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being C scribed as follows; Beginning at an iron rod in the East line of S.W. 92nd Ave., Co. oad, No. 2076 (25 ft: from centerline), which point bears `S 89 }' �� Road 4. •` . egt. 58 min. 57 sec. W a distance of 1,.'159.82 ft. and S 00 deg. 01 min. W a distance .of-1,485,40 ft. from the Northeast corner of said' Section 14; thence S 0 deg. 01 riari.'W along the West line of 4 that 'tract of land described as'Tract 2 in deed to John Schecka, recorded • in Book 156, page 91, Records of Washington County& a ' ,y distance of 50.00 ft. 'to an iron rod; thence S 89 deg. 58 min. 57 , sec. W a distance of 2.99 ft. to the Bast lino of S.W. 92nd Ave., Co. Road No. 2076; thence tracing said East line 50.12 ft along the arc of a 434.26 ft. ' radius curve to the left through a ' central angle'of 6 deg. 36 mid. 45 sec. (the chord of which' bears • N 3 deg. 26 'min. 19 sec. E,, 50.09 ft„) to the point of beginning. ' This description is based on a survey by John .G. Seppeto, Oregon PLS No. 657,' dated , April 13, 198,7,, and filed under Washington ' County Surveyor's Office Recording '; (o22,•315te`' • , 1 • 1 • . • . , , 1 • • • • • • i • • • rti•...� . w i .� .ter...... _ '..nr'• . . ' y • ' . ' 10 at'''‘ ' • . V •r• - • ,yW✓'* (t� "I.,:,dl _ • ,/^" _. • • 1 of �d . 0 . ♦ ♦ ' ' 3 E3�I=IBIiT ' a 100 . m k 4., . . . . . . :,.:„ :.ci,, ., .:.,.., , _____.. . ' , . .,. , • • • cd • . 14 v 84.0 P.C. 0.88 f R c 4092c� ' :'ff°'� ' N 89"58'57"E I IV)' I a �ai• ` 4r�/• r , R o • 0 2�� of WI' 25 .� r ''Detail:-A-'2. (No Scale) , 314 Iron Pip . • , In Mori Sax .,' �Y•1.84 , 1 P.G. /1� .__.Q.,.r._...�L. i s _ •� t 59 1 AG . 1 o ' N ,o 6. ?�.. . ,...a . . , 9 5 W ` 0.55 . . rl ' :J.-r + 1000• • I �• °p� ` �' I ';1• West Linty of Tract Z1,.,';.,1•' ;�`'1'• , ''•1` p e'' 1 5k,156-Pg,,9� 't.r••,:t . +, 4; K s r !' +a a '• t , •t. '.3l� Iron Pipe a°, o ;/017: 1 ' 'i'• 1 t7 v li` :'.'"f III ,'! t • • • f / BOO t 1 + • t• • 1.7 0 • • • • / i 1 ' STATE OF OREGON 1 1 = SS I lI2 Iron Pi r F . County of Ngahtngtnn II Donald W.Mason,Director of Aos/asment and Taxation and EX Officio Recorder of Con.. ..41 ■u,,,1 vayencea r•6010,, un�r'' 4#10 91.01111.11 that the'"vithi J ( t ling'Maas,,1 eceived C9 and recordo In t�alcol txis o,ua1'i iwhunty1 " -1 + :� Donald W. Matron, DIt�'pctor of A.ieer}ment anti Taxa on, Ex, A • Offic.Io County Cleilt .x F b"� I 1 SEP—8 AM 10.40 • a• . +11111. :1, • i ., . 0 . . . . . . IP 0 . •' .• ''�- y AGREIQEEINT i AUGUST 5, 1987 r WHEREAS: ` Gray and B.C. amb `'', R.A. 0ray and Linda D. y . and Zada Lamb (First Party) desire ..,. , described y B BANK OREGON, N.A. (Second Party) to convey that certain piece of property Exhibit A attached, and shown in attached Exhibit B, to the City of Tigard as Public Right of Way, in order to provide access from S.W. 92nd Avenue to First Parties property. ... . ,,,,,T. .. , • '... NOW THEREFORE: ,. In convideration of second parties willingness to convey said property to ••- the City of Tigard, First Party agrees to pay to Second Party the sum of F.A .•Y $390,0.00. This sum to be paid upon execution of documentation provided by City of Tigard. • % ' s • f not fully consumated by September 5 1987, this Agreement shall become null .-d ; 1 nt y by September ' g and void unless extended and agreed to in writing by both parties. / FIRST P. t 'Y: SECOND PARTY: ' .Ae gay IIII Date „---- g 0 R GON, N.A. \ _. . 0 n - .... __.... ..v.4R•Y.rl.w+r..r .,.... .r';1" • ll ' i.w .. . Linda D. G ray Date Ri a1.- :d so C r VP Date A •L *-19.--. �p E. a.cab' Date , ..c^j. V� .- / i'2k 0 ad i�a�ib -*--2.---...41V 47 ' Date S I µw y \" ... —. 4 ,( • �i. r �, /anon I�I�I�IIi(t' (69 CffYOFTIRD _ . . . REGOR February 29, 1988 25 Years of Service 1961-1986 Chuck Lewis N , C. E. Lewis Assoc. 10175 SW Barbur Blvd. Suite 312 B Portland, Or 97219 RE: Riverwood Lane �� Dear Mr. "Jewis ll" As we discussed earlier, Riverwood Lane was originally designated as a minor collector street in the Tigard Comprehensive Plane Following a public hearing with Cit , Council, this street was reclassified to a local street, b , the Plan still calls for "indirect local street connections :., between 92nd Avenue and 108th Avenue1 . I have attached a : ' N } copy of the relevant portions of the Plan map. N a develop remaining portion of the Kneeland Estates subdivision, a t In Order to develo the r ..: _ through street required hrou h s�.ree..t will be r unless a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved by City - Council. T trust this information is sufficient. Please contact me if you need further assistance. Sin erely, Keith S. Liden Cg Senior Planner dj ;d a. ' 13i25 SW Hail 3bk 23397,Tigard,C. regoh 97223 (503)630-417,1 ..,, ti r Y ' . rr ----.!........,-..-..:,`-'''''.•,,-.", R ' ' '''''...A.A 1 1 1 t 1 i ,�?'-Tr � + •1 � �•�' x� �� `"'�'^?; , 1'71,„ T,:.,.,,.�. .. .., .' .,,,.„L+' »� k1'1 , ., f f� , »�,,, .K j A�i " . T' ..-. .,• "- ..-.,-,-* V ,41.,..iLti,+-...-4. , • r..,\ '- \I,'k,.k 1\ ',11 t.., 7' 1,4-lit , 4,,:. A ' . 1 r \_... t\ - '''' ',..?.. i•-„,,' 1:gt ' ,t).q.-1,, AT. ' *l '' ''':rfriliTit M ! 4-'44-.Z.,L,t,(7-7,f710•((.).-.' ','',i) --- ..i',1 ,:_.,-,, 7.0 , •,, ',' a '..-~e 1 t . " ''�^,* I� M �'+' � 1 •r "^�� ., F, . r h 6 * ‘ 0 '",'I .*:: '14:.;!,.- to ,--,,,-- ' ',1 • 1'''1 ,.. '-e.' '. ). -,.--i* ,'".r't . ;. --- vie In_..: vr- . Q a ' c�' t j.....--1._,1 . ,T,z .� 1 11..,, ems' .., ,,} ��y /( `A yI. y► V' w , 1 7 \ \9s :• .. r i J �4 ate.ill .� r a { . ,.t , r 1 , ik t F<. w } �, 1n 'r , %n//�!. B- J'#c , r 1 �' 1 'f7f1 r#1 r i/, :., h 1� .Y' r- , 1 1 l � T H \ )c.. * -*7 I r « t - " 4i,.`_ e., 4,,,,,,',! .›.. ti ,. : t,.., 4".1.s.„.„,. . , • •, i a ,. 4 \--A -e'r,9-.0.- .',, . -.--- I Iti „.„„. t W 1 V ...11 •-.1,...:1, 1 " 0 . 1 ,, 0 ,4 . -" '4__,-------'''--- — A \.' 't *. s j 2 '... iAl V 11,. \. ; ' '•. ''', . II '7' . ,, ,,\v..... ..,,,..72, t.d, JAI -- , -1 r- w 1 ...1 a . ;\; v,., Tt 1 i ___...,...... , ila Y i . \, AY{E 1 wC 1 l'' _ „ _,. 5 r ` 0. ' '^ A,1, t"'' Yom' . .. ___..t....----•`-'c' .1 I- {1 , 1 il_L. - y' ` * '..,.. ,, .. . , .•..:,..,.,....,.... 1,, ..� - v-i i11 .�- 1 .. .w t \ -1 i; 1 _. .4., •, t I 1, ''. ,. ,.: Y r ; __—....-- ' \ ' A .T.', ' �� r .„---- -'—1 :,'%''. - \ {{ ••• �M,.-� � ~ 11 .+ .i, ' 1'1. ♦ 1'y 1 ,'41/",1 :.r\ '•. \ I^µ.�►: °i ��\' ' \ },».hA i 1 \ 11 "�'l'` 1. • by �. 1` a �...1...,'"'" ».1.w .s,, ,, ..,„:,,... ...:`'".`\\, , ''''''''Nf,liNses.V4 --- \ ' ., ,, ,,,,,w: ".--.7?-7-n...._"r✓I 1 -r- R r—•t-, LEGEND I IkA I-i - ,,._. , i I ;ONNECTION BETWEEN S•.HOLLS FERRY 'ROAD 'AND Sm. 135tH AVENUE NEAR COMPREHENSIVEWALNUT STREET- PLAN CONNECTION BETWEEN` I2Ist VIA NORTH DAKOTA AND SPRI?.GBRUOK TO UMMER1_AKE ° AREA ISPRINGRROOX WOULD BE :4 LOCAL STREET) aND S.W 130th AVENUL. • Y MAPn/� CONNECTION BETWEEN SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD AND S.VV. itBth AVENUE AND FALCON = i_ 3 RISE DRI E_ ' 4 CONNECTIONS BETWEEN WALNUT STREET BULL MOUNTAIN .ROAD AND GAARDE STREET. ET. T R AS PT T I P 5 ^A,DNND MEC OT N1OTnA S RBOEATDWEN HUNZIKER STREET„HALL BLVD.,AT OMRA (GENERALLY), .- OR 6 CONNECTION BETWEEN PACIFIC HIGHWAY AND I--.5 VIA 'DARTMOUTH,SETWEEN .69th AND s s. HAMPTON VIA A LOOPED RGA(, WITHIN THE WESTERLY PORTION OF THE TRIANGLE AREA. MAY 9 1 7 CONNECTION OF COMMERCIAL STREET BETWEEN S.W. 95th AND 98th AVENUES. 3 .1 r-i • CONNECTION OF• ASH AVENt;c :BETWEEN HILL STREET AND BURNHAM :AN:D ANY • REMAINING UNIMPROVED PORTIONS OF ASH. i PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS i 9 ]N ECT LOCAL STREET CONNECTIONS BETWEEN 92nd AND 109th. -; I t ,r YEAR 2000 100 10 RUESSER ROAD BYPASS ROUTE AS :A POSSIBLE LINK TO MURRAY' BLVD. PR0JEC ' ONS 10 ::, - EXISTING STREETS i YEAR 1990 kl�m� ARTERIAL PROJECTIONS I ,- /Zi7//9if4 .4".% MAJ0'R OL ECT0'R ' DEPARTMENT OF PLAN!ING & DEVELOPMENT �;ld..��.d MINOR COLLECTOR .:, L'TY OFiTIGARD, )R E G 0 N a V I C I N I T V LIGHT RAIL T RA,N�SIT CORRIDORS (t RT); ., SCALE IDt BOO, ._._... ._ i 29 2.9 28 I - 2e 3'7 s _� 33 i 34 N ` LI__ice __ f i. _____ _ .� a .., c I T y T 1 1 __, .____ _ _ .___ _., _ T I : -'.i. _.1.. :• -?. -iy. (C•l.-. _ ` i. 4f i 1 1 t i _ _ . t • - ' °S •sY a - u f .f • 1 � LF 1• � , f' i . ' _ -.. • �D .{ .i _-sl ,'• .D- :.� .s�s . i - - =� v �: • 4 'jE � f .T f i s. dIUIS A1916®19.31 i• o try .. Si :. �' isk.,. ,,,,, , (, , ,...../ , I) i ,4Mittl' ! ),, AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 'STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I Losegn_R. Wjj.s an , being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: (Please Print; That I am xix the Re.,g2sAgL for The City of Tigard, Oregon. , That I served notice of Final Decision for the Tigard City Council of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the 2_11. t day of 43,_ 198 (ei , by mailing to each of them at. the address shown on the at shed list (Marked Exhibit B), said notice as heret0 attached, deposited in the United States Mail on the ;.)..' '1'-, day of VYM, . •_�.....0 198 ;p , postage prepaid. • r .,...II) r 1 i .rt. • Signature 4 vvtl Person Wh delivered; to POST OFFICE Subscribed and sworn to before me on the _,i,1!4!,::_ day of t, ,.?...4,0__________, i98. • rt eI ,.,.;,''':.\!',.`,1,A 0 9 „,„, a. ,, M, „r � (NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON �� My GI�mm'i s s i,.on Expires: ._.../ E' ^j (02571) e • 411 110 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION - BY CITY COUNCIL (Soc. 18.32.390) 1. Concerning Case Number(s): S 1-86 . • 2, Name of Owner: Lincoln Savings & Loan 3 Name of Applicant: Norm Harker Alpha Engineering Address 1750 SW Skyline B/Ard. city Portland State OR zip97221 4. Location of Property: Address West of 92nd Ave. Betwe,l.n Kneeland Estates No II & Cook Park. • Legal Description (WCTM 2S1 14.A. lot 900) 5, Nature of Application: An appeal l by NPO # 6 of Planning Commission approval to subdivide 8.68 acTig--TEETTUITEF-grEE- m-Waiiiiiii-TaFTER-75F775UT-gq. ft. 6 Action: The Tigard City COuncii heard this matter ore 4/14/86. The Council upheld the Planning Commission's decision to approve with modifications. The final order (Ordinance 86-22) was,approved at the 5/5/86 Council meeting. 7 Notice Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to X 4 The applicant & owners X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 0. Final Decision THE DECISION WAS SIGNED ON LLYJLL___ AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON 6L2186 The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, 11,0, Bo 23307, Tigard, Orecion 97223, A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LuaA) according to their procedures, 9, 9UestiRns: If You hale anY questions, please call the Tigard City Recorder 639-4171, (02570) : Lin oln Savings & Loan 4 - MAILING FOR 10250 SW Greenbtirg Rd S 1-86 APPEAL Portland, OR 97223 , f' _ David Homer Norm Harker ., ' *I :. ..' 16520 SW 93rd Alpha Engineering `. ' Tigard, OR 97224 1750 SW Skyline Blvd. . ... Portland, OR 97221 y Don Mangelli Guy Mount 16415 SW 93rd .. . 95.00 SW Riv,,..rwoo: Lane • . Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 � Phil Pasteris, NPO #6 Chair LIZ COLLINS �� - 8935 SW Pinehrook Street -: ,� SW Copper Creek Cr . Tigard, OR 9724 D 6545 S g , Tigard, OR 97224 4` - •,4-, SALLY ARROYO 9505 SW Riverwood Lane a- Tigard, OR 97224 j DAN LESUE 9540 SW Riverwood Lane ., Tigard, OR 97224 I C I t> RIM *. b• al CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 410 ORDINANCE NO. , . . A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL • REQUESTEL BY LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN, FILE NO — 86, UPHOLDING THE . :•••• PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS, ENTERING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION ,. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council heard the above application at • it's Regular Meeting of April 14, 1986 in a review of the Planning Commission action of March 4 1986. The applicant was represented by Novm Harker of Aidha Engineering, Appearing in opposition were David Homer, Sally LeRoy, Don Mangelli and Dan Leslie and; Phil Pasteris representing NPO #6. The Council finds the following facts in this matter: WHEREAS, the applieant applied far preliminary plat approval for an 18 lot subdivision on an 8.68 acre property on the west and east side of 92nd Avenue south of Kneeland Estates II (tCTM 2'31 14A, T4 L. 900) WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission conducted a hearing on this matter on March 4, 1986. The Commission voted to grant preliminary plat . . approval of 51-86 subject to conditions, The information supporting the applicant' s request, the record of the hearing, and the final order of the Planning Commission are found in Planning Number 51-86; and, • WHEREAS, on March 10, 198i, the application was appealed by Neighborhood Planning Organization No, 6 for a review of the record before the "':•- Council, A hearing date of April 14, 1,98C was later scheduled, and, • WHEREAS, the City Council had before it the record of the " proceeding before the Planning Commission. The matter was brought before the City Council under Section 18.32.310(b) and 18,32,3204 The public hearing was held on April 14, 1986; and, WHERLAS, the relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2,1,1, 3.1,1, 3 .1, 7.1.2, 7,3,1, 7,4,4, , 8.1, 1, . • and 8, 1,3 and Community Development Code Chapters 18,50, 18, 150, and 18, 164. Since the Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, the Stateoido Planning Goals and Guidelines no longer need to be addressed, 131. E2 WHEREAS, the City Council concludes that the proposal with minor modifications is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive 4% Plan based upon the findings noted below: a Policy 2, 1 , 1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization arid surrounding property owners were given notice . of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant' s . proposal, ORDINANCE NO, 86 - ..• • : Page 1 ' ' ' ' 4.... . . . .. ....... • ' b. Policy 3. 1 .1 •1 be satisfied provided that alltkportions of the :,.."'.. lots which exceed 25% slope are not graded or filled without a .; Sensitive Lands Permit. / . . l Aso the wetlands areas on the site will be evaluated as part of the ..,....' required permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oivision .t. land State Lands. ,...„ C. Policy 3.2.1 will be satisfied because development within the 100 year flood plain will be avoided. if any of the proposed street does encroach upon the flood plain, a Sensitive Lands Permit will be required. d. Policy 7.1.2 can be met when additional information, noted in the Engineering Diviuion comments, is submitted and appropriate mitigation measures taken. ' 'V e. Policy 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 are satisfied because adequate water and .... ? ..,. sciwer facilities are available to the development. The applicant also indicates that these facilities will be provided within the . •„ subdivision as required by the City standards. . 4■ f. Policy 8.1.1 will be met once the termination of Riverwood Lane P.■:, " . at 92nd Avenue is justified or provisions for futUre extension to .. the east are made. , t g. Policy 8.1 .3 will be satisfied when the conditions of approval relating -,..... to street improvements are completed. *..' . WHEREAS, THE City Council has determined that the proposal is consistent . with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: ..:". a. Chapter 18.50 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets all of the requirements of the R-4.5 zone. tr. b. Chapter 18.160 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets the requirements set forth for the submission and approval of a preliminary plat. .',. ' c. Chapter 18.164 of the Code will be satisfied during the approval . process for the final plat. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City ,:ouncil upheld the Planning Commissi-,n 0..f:,..cision ... based upon the findings, and conclusions above, and approves of S 1-86 subject to the following conditionst ,... 1. UNLESS OTHEPWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR ' TO RECORDINJ THE FINAL PLAT. 2. Standard halt-street and full street improvements includinq sidewalks, curbs, streetlIghts, driveway aprons, storm drainaq and utilities (delete inapplicable items) shall be installed along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage. Said improvements alt'! 4,. . SW 92nd Avenue shall be built to (6(0 R/W, 36" Pvmt.) City .., . standards including an 8 ft, walk on the West side and contotm ,.q. to the alignment of existing improvements. (* note the V., attached section which was approved via Kneeland Estates Sukilvi-hlon devPlopmont . ) ..,. twhINANcv N. . ... p age 2 3• Seven sets of plan-profile public . rovement construction plans including a site grading g plan and croez sections and one e - ,• - ° (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Encine `r, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Er eineerring Section for approval. ;. � 4, Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profile details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plan. 5,. Slope ease tents along SW Riverwood Lane shall be 9 provided to the ' -)( - public. Documentation shall be on City forms or on the plat and approved by the Engineering Section, 6, The applicant shall provide a stormwater runoff report o'∎'°" '.o� addressing • addressing proposed vns�.te and offsite stermWater• control and soil erosion control (during and after construction);n);said c ` report shall also address the impact !p g facilities on the site and the mitigation: of stormwater,- damage .. to the downs lope City park and open space lands. '- :'-%. ,, 7, Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence , ` until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public . . improvement plans. The Sections will require posting of a 100`L w ,.. Performance bond, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streelight fee, Also, the ekecuti4n of a construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement ' �. plans, SEE ThE�• ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC • , - INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES BONDING AND AGREEMENTS, n.: R, SW Riverwood Lane will connect with Riverwood Lane in the ,. - development to the west (Copper Creek) , 9, Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to -the Public along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage to increase the right--of-wait to 30 feet from centerline. The description for said dedication shall 1 . . -: be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by Washington County The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section.. DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARL ENCLOSED 10. Double frontage Lots 6,7,8, and 11 shall face 93rd Avenue and be. restricted to only one access each on a same public roadway. • OD t , Lot #16 shall only have direct access onto SW Riverwood Lane, 0 e 12, The applicant shall provide ^ traffic report indicating measures to be applied to mitigate sight distance concerns, at the intersection of River-wood Lane and 92nd Avenue, to the ;: Engineering Section, The Riverwood Lane easterly access shall be addressed in conjunction with this study, ., y 4 13. Lots 17 and 18 shall '.e deleted and half street improvements ,. . ., e, will not, be required on the east side of Bend Avenue at this •. ..� � . time. Half street i proVener Ls will be constructed at the time the!, Lots 17 and 18 are developed. a ORD 1 NANC Nth 86- wP-y . , . . ...., • 24.1-.. . 4 14. Aiverwollikane shall be extended to 92nd Illpue with else aesigh , . . . . criterio 'voted in Item #5 of the memo da 4/3/86 from the city . Engineer (Exhibit "A:) , will be addresse&, Final approval of street. 7% 1 and parking design shaAlebe granted by t'.1 City Engineer. 15. The property shall be surveyed and the applicant shall dedicate -...,' lands within the 100 year floodplain for greenway purposes. 16. The necessary permits shall be obtained from the U.S. Army Corps *"./ of Engineers and the Division of State Lands. The Prelimin:rY Dik -. ..Li, . , •••••• .„ plat shall be modified as necessary to accommodate the f,* condition(s) of approval granted by these two agencies. . , • • ,., 17. If allowed through the permit process by the Corps of Engineers g... ,...,, ., . and Division of State LRnds, a footpath shall be incorporated • .. between Riverwood Lane and Cook Park, . ". . ,.., 18. Street Centerline Monumentat,ion .:., -.. -. ..„ . a. In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2), the centerlines of - ... .. •.„. , all stt-eet and roadway rights-of-way shall be monumeribed before the .'..".city shall accept a street improvement. r,.... . , . . . ..... ...r. , b. All centerline monuments shall be placed in a monument box conforming to City ,Ptandards, and the top of all monument boxes . . .. , shall be set at design finish grade of said street or roadway, . ., • . . : ._ . . , . . c. The following centerline monuments shall be set: ,.•' (1) All or:Interline-centerline intersections, Intersections • created with "collector" or other existing streets, shall be set when the centerline alignment of said "collector or other ..: ...,- .• street has been established by or for the City: (2) Center of all cul-de-sacs, ,,.. (3) Curve points, points of intersection (P I) when their position falls inside the limits of the pavement otherwise beginning and ending points (B r.,' an ' C ) , . . . .. ... (4) All sanitary and storm location shall be placed in positions that do not interfere with centerline monumentation, -. 19, A Sensitive Lands Permit shall be required for any encroachment ; OG into the lua year floodplain or construction in drainageways oe U) , slopes over 25%. ,' .. , — 20, Lot 12 shall be si.bject to the setback and height requirements ..1 03 ' For flag lots contained in Sections 18.96,090 4nd 18 .98 of he .' Code. Ul •. ...1 4 21 . A tree cutting permit shall be obtained from the City prior to . removing any trees over 6 inches ih diameter, :,-. . . ., . . ,. .. , •■.1 ' V 0 ()R 0 INANti/r■ NO 86 ... 4 •. . .1.,..* . . . - . . . ._, ,. w • , • ,,....., ,.„ ,. L , . t , ... . . • . li' , . .P . • / •P 4 ., 22. "Local Traffic Only" signs will be allowed at the entrance .. , to the subdivision at 92nd Avenue. 23. The applicant shall create CCEIR's compatible with adjacent ...- subdivisions of Kneeland Estates and Copper Creek. 24. The applicant shall submit to staff for approval a rendering ". of a structure (for example but not limited to a brick wall) . -- - . to indicate that a driver is entering a neighborhood. ' . . 25. Lots 6, 7, 8, and 11 shall be partkof Phase 1 of the project. . ,... 26. After review and approval by the Planning Director and City Engineer, the Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington ol . County. 27. This approval, is valid if exercised within one year of the -- final decision date noted below. . . - N . . SECTION 2: It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the - entry of this order. . v , PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present after being . 1 . "1 . . . read by number and title only, this ....Erji day of May, 1986. . . ./Deputy City Recorder - City of Tigard -0, to APPROVED: ril-i? This / day of May, 1986. . . ... \ lis", 1 ; co ...11 ,„ ayof - City of Tigard ,..."' . - ; to a ....1 : . .., . ., ,,-,,,, . , ../. , ' . . ,. ORDINANCE NO. 86 - .... --' Page 5 Jr '' :, . -. - :0,... . - - . r , .„fi. • .' 4,, 1, ' .-.... , -. -. . '' ' ?'„ f.• " -:' 1 - — — ..... .„, -7" ' ?• • . , 4110 0 - - - 44 011 I . MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 'I• •. ... .. . r .," t'. ." , TO: Members of City Council ,n,,/* April 3, 1986 . . .1 . ) /4A1 .'' ''L'.-Z '.... FROM: Randy Wooley, City Engineer SUBJECT: proposed Plat of Kneeland Estates III . , „y • A ... . „ In discussions regarding the proposed plat of Kneeland Estates III, several concerns have been raised regarding traffic and streets. Based on my research and on discussions at the April 2, 1986 neeting of NPO #6, I have the following comments: 44,-144. 1. There is m great deal of concern about vehicles traveling at excessive speeds on SW 92nd Avenue between the High School and Cook Park, This is apparently an existing problem, not related to the subdivision. It . , appears to me that this is a traffic engineering problem which we should address this summer as a City problem, rather than as a .., 4. • •• •.,. ' subdivision condition, 2. There is a great deal of concern about through traffic on neighborhood ..:.' streets, Of special concern is the Coroeehensive Plan designation of Riverwood Lane as a minor collector connection between SW 92nd Avenue ,q,. and SW 108th Avenue, I fee1, that it is a valid concern, Therefore, I recommend a review of this tsortion of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map for possible amendment, The review needs to be initiated promptly, as several developments are contemplated in the area in the near future. , 3% There was a question whether Riverwood Lane should be extended east of kl' f • ems Ft „ GO , 0.- 63 ... (9 SW 92nd, Review shows that such an extension would ,-.e.quire substantial , , fill in the floodplain and wetlands areas, A better location for an eastward access road appears to be approximately 150 feet north of Riverwood Lane at the top of the hill. I recommend that Riverwood Lane not be extended eastward from SW 92nd Avenue, 4 , The concept of constructing River-wood Lane as a narrower—than—standard street was discussed, NPO #6 did not support the idea, Therefore, I , , . r.11 recommend that Riverwood Lane in kneeland Estates TI1 be designed at • the same width at the existing Riverwoo'!, Lane in the adjoining ... . subdivision (approximately 34 feet) , •.„ . . . . 44- ' „ . 4, • F7t6 ' • ' 1'46 ` 410 .: Memo to Council April 3, 1986 , • Page 2 • • 5. There was concern that adequate sight distance be provided on SW 92nd Avenue for safe traffic operations. A traffic study was suggested to address this concern. I feel that we can achieve better results by specif i ig certain design criteria. Therefore, I recommend that ,'.. Planning Commission Condition No. 12 be amended to read as follows; 12. The Y•, ;.- .. •< public improvement plans for SW 92nd Avenue shall. • provide a minimum stopping sight distance of 300 feet • along SW 92nd Avenue and a minimum intersection sight - distance of 350 feet for vehicles entering from Riverwood tl` Lane, These criteria are based on national standards developed by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). The e AASHTO standards are somewhat conservative, thereby presiding for the fact that some vehicles will exceed the design speed of 35 MPH (the current speed limit) , These requirements are greater than what we would usually require on a minor collector such as SW 92nd, ,.s 6, There was a request for additional. traffic studies to determine existing a• traffic volumes and traffic speeds on SW 92nd Avenue Such studies would be useful in addressing existing traffic concerns oo SW 92nd Avenue, but would probably not help much in decidinci how to design Kneeland Estates III. Therefore, I would questions whether volume/speed 4 „ studies should he a condition of subdivision approval, • d_ If^ L , ~ (RRW;br/2436P) OC tl rY •w. x y , x V vd i �� fi, w . A 410 city •iluARO, ORLUON 41) ORDINANCE NO. 86722-• 0 A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTrR OF THE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL REQUESTED BY LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN, FILE NO. S1 — 86, UPHOLDING rHE - •, PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS, ENTERING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council heard the above application at it' s Regular Meeting of April 14, 1986 in review of the Planning Commission . . . action of March 4, 1986. The applicant was represented by Norm Harker of Alpha Engineering, Appearing in opposition were David Homer, Sally LeRoy, Don Mangelli and Dan Leslie and; Phil Pastoris representing NPO #6, • • The Council • indri, the following facts 4n this matter: WHEREAS, the applicant applied for preliminary plat approval for an 18 lot subdivision on an 8,68 acre property on the west and east side of 92nd Avenue south of Kneeland Estates III (WCTM 281 14A, T. 4 900) . . WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission conducted a hearing on this matter on March 4, 1986, T. Commission voted to grant preliminary plat approval of 81-86 subject to conditions. The informatiOn supporting the applicant's request, the record of the hearing, and the final order of the Planning Commission are found in Planning rile Number Si 36 and, - • 0 - WHEREAS, Oh March 10, 1086, the application was appealed by Neighborhood Planning Organization No 6 or a review of the record before the Council, A hearing date of April 14, 1986 was later scheduled, and, •. r WHEREAS, the City Council had before it the record of the , proceeding before the Planning Commission, The matter was brought before the City Council under Section 18 ,12,110(b) and 18,32,320, The public hearing was held on April 14, 1986; and, - - WHEREAS, the relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2,1.1, 8 ,1.1, 342,1, 7.1,2, 7,1.1, 7.4.4„ 8,1, 1, • and 8. 1 ,3 and Community Development Code Chapters 18,50, 18, 16o, and 11, 164, Since the Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, the Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines no longer need to be addressed, 11„ WHEREAS, the Ci.ty Council concludes that the proposal with minor at , modifications j onsistent with ti-e relevant portions of the Comprehensive ..., 0 Ptah based Upon the findings noted below, a Policy 2, 1 , 1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning g/3 0rjani4uajon and surrounding property owners were giVen notice • : of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the aPplicant' s proposal, ORDINANCF NO 86 - • P,Aga 1 Ask 6 b. Policy 3.1.11100.1 be satisfied provided that aliPportions of the lots which exceed 25% slope are not graded or filled without a • Sensitive Lands Permit. / Also, the wetlands areas on the site will be evaluated as part of the required permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Division land State Lands. c. Policy 3.2.1 will be satisfied because devloPment within the 100 year flood plain will be avoided. If,! any of the proposed street does e , encroach upon the flood plain, a Sensitive Lands Permit will be required. 4' d. Policy 7.1.2 can be met when additional information, noted in the . , Engineering Division comments, is submitted and appropriate mitigatilen eo measures taken. ' e. Policy 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 are satisfied because adequate water and sewer facilities are available to the development. The applicant also indicates that these facilities will be proVided within the subdivision as required by the City standards. f. Policy 8.1.1 will be met once the termination of RiverwOod Lane at :42nd Avenue is justified or provisions for future extension to the east are made. g. Policy 8.1 .3 will be satisfied when the conditions of approval relating to street improvements are completed. WHEREAS, THE City Council has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: a, Chapter 18.50 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets all of the requirements of the R-4.5 zone. b. Chapter 18.160 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets the requirements set forth for the submission and approval of a preliminary plat. c. Chapter 18.164 of the Code will be satisfied during the approval process for the final plat. THE CITY OP TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council upheld the Planning Commission decision based Upon the findings, and conclusions above, and approves of S 1-86 subject t-o the following conditions; 1 . UNLeee OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITTONS SHALL BE MET PR!ov TO RECORDING THE rINAh PLAT, • 2. eLeedard half-eLLeet. and full street improvements ihciudine sldewe1ks, curbs, streetlights, driveway ptons, Storm draindoo and utilitieb (delete inapplicable items) shall be installed along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage. Said improvements alone * SW 92nd Avenue shall be built to (60 Fl/w, 364 pvmt. ) cikv standards inoludi ig an 8 ft, walk on the west side and oent ern to Ilvf ..-41.ignmr:)HL el existing improvements, note the attached „„vcti.sh which was approved vie Kneeland Estates ieeelepmenl . ) 11,1AN !„1.. e, • pap,0 2 . . .H Ai& -. e. : 3. Seven 1 sets of plan-profile public Wr-ovement construction plans i luding a site gradince plan and cross sections and one :a• • 4 (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered . Professional Civil ' Engineer, detailing all proposed public . e improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for , , .. • approval, . -, ... - 4, Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profile details shall be provided . . "eke --' ' as part of the public improvement plan. . 0 . .. L.'■ ......;' ■ . 5, Slope easements along SW Riverwood Lane shall be provided to the s.- , . - - public. Documentation shall be on City forms or on the plat and• ' . : approv„dd by the Engineering Section. e , , - 6. The applicant shall provide a stormwater runoff report addressing proposed onsite and offsite stormwater control and ,. ., . . . \ie.. , , soil erosion control (during and after construction); said report shall also address the impact of upstream drainage . ,,.........'.., facilities on the site and the mitigation of stormwater damage . • to the downslope City park and open space lands. 7. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public e - improvement plans. The foections will require posting of a 100% s - . . Performance bond, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streelight fee. Also, the exetution of a construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or . concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement . , . •. plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES BONDING AND AGREEMENTS. . 7... ' i, . ........................—.... ...,.........-....--...—......,..........---....-..............-P—......--..........................,-..................--...-g..........t............, 8, SW Riverwood Lane will connect with Riverwood Lane in the development to the west (Copper Creek). - . ..e- 9. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to - the Public along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline, The description for said dedication shall . s ..- be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by WatIthington County, The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section, DEDICATION FORMS \., AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED. , to, Double frontage Lots 6,7,8, and 11 shall face 93rd Avenue and be 11 restricted to only one access each on a same public roadway. 61 - 11 , Lot #16 shall only have direct access onto SW Riverwood Lane. Ed 12 , The applicant shall provide a traffie report indicating measures CD ILI . to be applied to mitigate sig'ol distance concerns, at Lhe intersection of Riverwood Lane and 92nd Avenue, to the reneering Section. The Riverwood Lane easterly access shall be addressed in conjunction with this study, - , - .,...., 13 . Lots 17 and 18 shall be deleted and half street improvements will not be required on the east side of 92nd Avenue at this 1 A . time. Half street improvements will be constructed at the time 11 that. Lots 17 ad 18 are developed. .11),0 ,. -t ORDINANCL NO, H6- ..P.- Jr. i JP . , 1 t ' ,' ','' ' - -: ..' ••" , v 'i, , ' ' " - :* - ' '" '''' ' „," ' . ' , . • 14. RiverwooFr';%ane shall be extended to 92nd Pidikue wi cti Chin desl, ii criterio'," oted in Item #5 of the memo dat. 4 3/86 from the City �• addressed. Final approval of street tEn i.neer, (Exhibit A:) , will be ad and parking design sh,7l1, be granted by the City Engineer. 15: The property shall be surveyed and the applicant shah dedicate lands within the 100 year f loodplain for greenway purposes. 16, The necessary permits shall be obtained from the U.S Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of State Lands. The preliminary ' plat shall be modified as necessary to accommodate the conditLon(s) of approval granted by these two agencies, 17, If allowed through the permit process by the Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands, a footpath shall be incorporated p , between Rierwood Lane and Cook Park , 18. Street Centerline Monurnentation •''` a, In accordance with ORS 42.060 subsection (2), the centerlines of • all street and roadway rights--of-way shall be monumented before • the City shall accept a street improvement. b. All centerline' monuments shall be placed in a monument box conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument boxes shall be set at design finish grade of said street or roadway, 4 c, The following centerline monuments shall be set: (1) All centerline—centerline intersections. Intersections ;4.„ created with "collector" or other existing streets, shall be set when the centerline alignment of said "collector' or other street has been established by or for the City: w • (2) Center of all cul—de—sacs. (3 1 Curve points, points of intersection (P I) when their position falls inside the limits of the pavement otherwise beginning and ending points (B C and E C ) . (4) All sanitary and storm location shall be placed in positions that do not interfere with centerline monuanentation. 1� , A Sensitive Lands Permit shall be required for any encroachment into the 100 year floodplain or construction in drainageways or slopes over 25%: 20. Lot 12 shall be subject to the setback and height requirements for flag lots contained in Sect ions 1U.96 .090 and 18,98 of the Cc,de, ', 21 . A tree cutting permit shall be r'btairted from the City prior to removing any trees over 6 inches 1 diameter .r -� OFWINr NflL NO. 86 �N- U' Page' y 0 22. Local Traffic Only" signs will be allowed at the entrance to the subdivision at 92nd Avenue. 23. The applicant shall create CC&R's compatible with adjacent subdivisions of Kneeland Estates and Copper Creek. 24. The app'i ant shall submit to staff for approval a rendering of a structure (for example but not limited to a brick wall) to indicat that a driver is entering a neighborhood. 25. Lots 6, 7, 8, and 11 shall be part of Phase I of the project 26. After review and approval by the Planning Director an City Engineer, the Final Plat shall be recorded with V ashington County. y,. 27. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. SECTION.�• 2s It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the ' • entry of this order. PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present after being read by number title only, this lh day of May, 1986. 40 .l�.nAF.�.� .4.4111 :;iJ`,"yam.1,. ..0 ar:.r`e+r-ih.�.m .•..°r VI; Deputy City Recorder City of Tigard APPROVED: Th i; "? day of May, 1986. F.. City of Tigard ORDINANCE NO, 86 I« 11.0111••■••■■■•••■..T... 14110k ..00. . 411 A4V, 0 .1e,tisir A , 4 MMdfiANOUM ■. 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON . ' . o- , , .. ....0 ' ,. TO Members of City Council April 3, 1986 FROM: Randy Wooley, City Engineer ' ,• ,-.. . 6",. . SUBJECT: Proposed Plat of Rivi'land Estates III -, in discussions regarding the proposed plat of Kneeland Estates III, several , . . ,.. -J, concerns have been raised roarding traffic and streets. -3ased on my research and on discussions at the April 2, 1986 meeting of NPO #6, I have the t t.,,-, - # , i following comments: 1. There is a great deal of concern about vehicles traveling at excessive . , speeds on SW 92nd Avenue between the High School and Cook Park. ' This . .. . . is apparently an existing problem, not related to the subdivision. It ,.... . . , , ....:: appears to me that this is a traffic engineering problem which we • should address this summer as a City problem, rather than as a '.t.., , .... subdivision condition. . , „. ., , 2, There is a great deal of concern about through traffic on neighborhood streets, Of special concern is the Comprehensive Plan designation of Riverwood Lane as a minor collector connection between SW 92nd Avenue and SW 108th Avenue, , . I,. . • ' .. . .. . „ ,) .,;,, .„- I feel that it is a valid concern. Therefore, I recommend a review of . ." this portion of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map for possible .., amendment, The review heeds to be initiated promptly, as several developments ;Are contemplated ih the area in the near future. ■ 3, There was a question whether Riverwood Lane should be extended east of . 4 SW 92nd, Review shows that such an extension would require substantial ae . fill in the floodplain and wetlands areas, , better locatioo for an co : eastward access road appears to he approAimately 350 feet north of . Riverwood Lane at the top of the hill, I recommend that RiverWood Labe 1 ....i not be extended eastward from SW 92hd A:ienUe, PI ::' f5 4, The concept of constructing Rivorwood Lane 1 :,.. narrowee—than—ttandard 1111 ' ' -JI street was discussed. NP0 M did not support the itiea, TherOore, I recommend that Riverwood Lane in Kneeland Estates III be deshgned at the same width as the existing Riverwood Lane ih the a,ijoihing , 1 subdivision (approximately 31 feet) , , .... ,„ • . , I s it • V 4 Memo to Council • April 3, 1906 Page 2 • 5. There was concern that adequate sight distance be provided on SW 92nd Avenue for safe traffic -operations A traffic study was suggested to address this concern. I feel that we can achieve better results by specifying certain design criteria. Therefore, I recommend that Planning Commission Condition No. 12 be amended to read as follows: 12 The pub',is improvement plans for SW 92nd Avenue shall provide a minimum 3tepping sight distance of 300 feet A g ,� in/lever intersection sight .,, along SW 92nd Avenue and a m distance of 350 feet for vehicles entering from Riverwood • Lane These criteria are based on national standards developed by the American Assocation of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) . The A(SHTO standards are somewhat conservative, thereby providing for the fact that some vehicles will exceed the design speed of 35 MPH (the current speed limit), these requirements are greater than what we would esually require on a minor collector such as SW 92nd. 6 There was a request for additional traffic studies to determine existing traffic volumes and traffic speeds on SW 92nd Avenue. such studies would be useful in addressing existing traffic concerns on SW 92nd Avenue but would probably not help much in deciding how to design Kneeland Estates III. therefore, I would questions whether volume/speed studies should be a condition of subdivision approval. (RRW,br/2436P) IIII r 0 p: AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ti. County of Washington ) ss. w City of. Tigard C 1,, a : I, I ; ( being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: (Please Print) r N �� That I am a ar for Or The City of Tigard, Oregon, That I served notice of Final Order for the Tigard Planning Commission. of which the attached ' a cop (Marked Fs ibit A) upon each of the {following °.: named persons on the ._, ',..:',2day of _ ii,,,,(Au 198 , by mailing to s. each of them at the address shown on the attar:+,: list (Marked Exhibit B), said t"otice as hereto attached, by posting on an appropriate bulletin board on � cam-, / , the ,,, 1911,2 and deposited in the United day of ar.i�,,/lr Jae► States Mail on the `' !�y of J.�� .., • 198 n postage prepaid. il i b, . -, ,, i i ; , 4 ' '119i I i 0/1 ' ?/t.,,,) "'. Sigi /'ll ui"e� , f Per`�+n :.ho post 7 p 4a11` ri let Board Person who deiiu ed to POST OFF :CE Subscribed and sworn to before me on the defy of _ _ < .._..` 190_6_, .' N A 1 , `j ? NOTARY PUBLIC .w r z • --- 4 14 . K"'rN' �`" 'a;`,1'a iisslon moires: ,. e-cJ (0257P) y CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Concerning Case Number(s): S 1-86 2. Name of Owner: Lincoln Savings & I,®an 3. Name of Applicant: Same A:ddreas X0250 SW Gxeenbur� Rd. - ity Party and State 0R Zip 9 4. Location of Property: Address West of 92nd Ave. between Kneeland Estates II and Cook Park Tax Map and Lot No(s)• (2S1 14A lot 900) ; a ° 5. Nature of Application:, Request to divide 8.68 acres into 18 lots with a minimum A size of 7,500 sq. ft. Approval as requested 6. �.ctio�► _ ,gym $.' v ,yam Approval with conditions WIONOMPOONIMIO"• Denial • ..I t,; 7. 'ot;(ce. Notice* was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall a,nd mated to: XX The applicant & owners Owners' of record within the regdired distance • fa•• __ The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON March l a) 198 6 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision; and statement of condition can be obtained from the Planning Department; Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, at P.O. Bois 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 0 9. A e. PP ,l] (A and Section 18.32,370 which provides that a ,brittenee pe l 18.32.290 ( ) Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance apwith may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent The deadline for filing of an appeal isL,: 4:30 10. 9ueations If you. ... have any gtaestions, please call the City of Tigard Plannitng Department 639.4171. (0257P) • • I ' ' v 41, 411 CITY Or TIGARD PLANNINCi COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO 0'6PC A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, WHICiel APPROVES AN APPLICATION FOR A SUBDIVISION (S 1-86) REQUESTE%) BY LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN_ �\ (NIS�Ya�... �waWllrwMwl� WOS�.I� 1�'mw wwwY /. The Tigard Planning Commission reviewed the above application at a public hearing on February 4, 186, The Commission based its decision on the facts, findings, and conclusions noted below: '': A. FACTS 1. 'General Information CASE: Subdivision S 1-86 REQUEST: To divide 8.68 acres into 18 lots with a minimum size of 7,500 -::. square feet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION! Low 'Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION R-45 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre) !APPLICANT Linceln Savings and Loan OWNER SAME 10250 SW Greenburg Road Portland; OR 97223 LOCATION: West of 92nd Avenue between Kneeland Estates No II and Gook Park 2. gacJIREPeRnd t Preliminary plat approval was granted in 1981 (S 11.8 /CPR 12-81) for 22 attached and 5 detached single family residential ;lots. The final plat Was never recorded and the approval has expired. 0 • 3. Y,ic pity _Information Kneeland Estates No 2 lies to the north and Tigard High School is northeast on the opposite side of 92nd Avenue, The R-4,5 zone applies to► this area. The Copper Creek development which is zoned R-7 (Pb) i cA develop ment) lies immediately west and (Residential, ook Park abuts thetsouthern�boun P ,; Cook � dart' r,'�� the property. 4. Site Information The property is presently undeveloped. The terrain slopes downward from north to south with grades of up to 30% it the northern portion of thg site. ThP eouthern half of the property is within the iO0 year flood plain. a . Y FINAL. ORDER NO 86.02PG - PAGE 1 'L r � • IIIe.-. . , .... : 'The applicant proposes to divide the property into 18 single family residential lots, all with a minimum size of 7,500 square feet. . . . - . . • . Riverwood Lane will be extended from its terminus at Copper Creek to 92nd Avenue. In addition to Riverwood Lane, four lots will have ,. .. frontage on the 93rd Aventee cul-de-sac in kneeland Estates No. 11. . .._ Although this proposal rk- )resents a reduction in the number o'' lots from .. . . , %, .,.k. 27 to 18, the subdivision layout and street alignment are very similar , e• -e to the proposal that wau approved in 1981. , , . . • . . .., . 5. taggyjsitAild 1_,...1.13.9txrits , , --- The Engineering Division has the followig comments: a. Lots 17 and 18 an the east side of 92nd Avenue will preclude the 4 e extension of Riverwood Lane to the east. The applicant should be e . able to show that other reasonable alternatives exist for proving access to the property to the east. . , .. .. . . -.. -. 0 b. The issue of stormwater runoff presents several problems which ... . - 17 , , must be clarified. Stormwater through "Tract A" from the school•. ..e ... - . property and 92nd Avenue needs to be addressed along with the , .- • gully through Lots 10, 11, and 12 and the drainage over Lot 8 in the event of a catch basin failure on the 93rd Avenue cul-de-sac. c. A private pond is located above Lot 12. Liability for any flooding caused 5y the pond. and the right of this owner to release water i onto Lot 11 is unknown, d. Slope easements along Riverwood Lane will be necessary. e, If Riverwood Lane does not connect with the completed portion in . . Copper Creek, a temporary turn around will be necessary. i f. Lots 7 and 8 have double frontage and access should be limited to one street. The access for Lot 16 shall be limited to Riverwood Lane. g. A traffic report is needed indicating what measures should be taken to mitigate the site distance limitations at the proposed . . . . Riveh000d Lane/92nd Avenue intersection, h. The applicant must provide stormwater runoff report addressing ac proposed on and off site srmeater and erosion control during and h- ' after construction. This report must Adrees the impact of ca ... upstream drainage facilities and the mitigation of adtterse stormwater impacts upon City park and greenway areas , ,.J -- . OD — i, The 100 year flood plain should be dedicated to ttita City as . ilm greenWay. j . A Sensitive Lands Permit will be necessary for any Construction or grading Within the flood plain, drainageWays, or slopes over 25%, . . " k Any reduction in the Width of the City's standard street section Will require the approval of a vw-iance, ,,, . -• , , e' rXWAL ORDER No. 86-02PC * PAGE 2 . . .. , . . , 410 • . 410 • . . , . The Building Inspection Division notes that the slopes on many of the lots are steep and that development and meeting setbacks standards may • e- be difficult. The Tigard School District and NPO 06 have no objection. No other comments have been received. Be FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 3,1,1, 3.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 0.1,1, and 8.1.3 and Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.160, and 18.164. since the Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, the Statewide Plarning Goals and Guidelines no longer need to be addressed. The Planning Commission concludes that the proposal with minor modifications is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: a. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning ,. • „ Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment or the applicant's proposal , b. Policy 3.1.1 will be satisfied provided that any portions of the Lots which exceed 251 slope are not graded or filled without a . .., Sensitive Lands Permit. . e - ce Policy 3,2.1 Will be satisfied beceuse development within the 100 year flood plain will be avoided. If any of the proposed street ... -¶4 does encroach upon the flood plain, a Sensitive Lands Permit will be required. . . . de Policy 7,1.2 can be met when additional information, noted ih the Engineer:1ns Dieision comments, is submitted and appropriate mitigation measures taken, . — . e Policy 7. 1.1 and 7.4.4 are satisfied because adequate Water and • ,... , ,,., serer facilities ate available to the development. The applicant also indicates that these facilities will be provided within the , . . subdi,Jision as required by the City standards. • ag . la" 00 I q -- OD , 5 , al f Policy 0.1.1 will be met once the teroination of Riverwood Lane at - 92 n d AVenUe is jus t ified or provisions for future exteneio n to the east are made C , g. Policy 0.1.3 Will be satisfied when the conditions of approval relating to street improvements are completed. _ . . • The Planning Commission has determined that the proposal is consistent . with the releVant portions of the Community bevelopment Code based upon , , the findings noted below: .. ' ...... ' . . " . . • , ' . • •• . , FINAL ORDER NO 86-02P0 — PAGE 3 : 4 410 , ... 4 a, Chapter 18.50 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets ; all of the requirements of the R-4.5 zone, .4 b. Chapter /8.160 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets .. the requirements set forth for the submission and aPProval of a ...' preliminary plat. 1 c. Chapter 18.164 of the Code will be satisfied during the approval •.• process for the final plat. C, DECISION' • . Based upon the findings, and concluoions above, the Planning Commission - approves of S 1-86 subject to the following conditions: 13 1. UNLESS OTHERWI3 NOTED: ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT. .• 2. Standard half-etreet and full street improvements including , ) sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aproes, storm drainage and utilities (delete inapplicable items) shall be installed along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage. Said improvements along SW 92nd Avenue shall be built to (60' R/W, 36' Pvmt.) City standards including an 8 ft walk on the wet side and conform to the alignment of existing improvements. (* eote the attached section II which was approved via Kneeland Estates subdivision development). 3. Seven (7) sets of planessrofile public improvement construction plans including a site gres'iin..3 plan and cross sections and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the En„4.eeering Section for approval. •. 14 4, Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profile details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans, 5, Slope easements along S Riverwood Lane stall be provided to the public, , Documentation shall be on City forms or on the plat and•approved by the Engineering Section. .4 6. The applicant shall provide a stormwater runoff report addressing . proposed onsite and offsite stormwater control and soil erosion control (during and after construction); said report hall elso address the impact of upstream drainage facilities on the site and the mitigation of stormwater damage to the dewnslope City park & open upece lands. 7 Construction of proposed public improVements shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved pUblic improvement plane. The Sections will require posting of a 100% Performance bondi the payment of a Permit fee and a sign i . .. _ . . nstalintion/streetlight fee Also, the execution of a , construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or *44 c°ncUi"rentlY with the issuance of ' 13136"ed public imPemiement THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING rEE scHEou_m ___, gggpxyG AND AGREEMENTS, PINEIL OgDbi? NO 86-02PC - PAGE 4 . . • . . . w 411 O. SW Riverwood Lane will connect with Rivers/reed Lane in the . . development to the west (Copper Creek). . , 9. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the ,4 SW 92nd Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet • from centerline. The description for said dedlcation shell be tied to the esitting right-of-way tenterline as established by Washington County. The dedication l document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section. DEDICATION FC:eMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED. 10. Double frontage lots, namely # 7 and 8, shall both be restricted to only one access each on the same public roadway, • 11. Lot #16 shall only have direct access onto SW Riverwood Lane. ' 12, The applicant shall provide a traffic eeport indicating measures to be applied to mitigate sight distance concerns, at the .- intersection of Riverwood Lane and 92nd Avenue, to the Engineering Section. The Riverwood Lane easterly aceest shall be addressed in *4 conjuhction with this study and Lots 17 and 18 shall be platted - and Trect "A" shall be dediceted to the City once the traffl,c , * study has been reviewed and approved by the Engineering Division. 13. The applicant shall de4lcate lands within the 100 year floodplain and the property south of the road not platted into Lots 1,2, and 3 for greenway purposes. 14. Street Centerline Monumentation a, In accordance with OR 92.060 subsection (2), the eee centerlines of all street and roadway rights-of-way hall be net eee-e monumented before the City shall accept a street improvement. -e- es. , b, All centerline monuments shall be placed in a monument box conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument boxes shall be set at design finish grade of said street or • roadwnY. 0 C. The following centerline inonUments shall be set: ' re ce 1) All centerline-centerline intersectiohs4 Intersections created with "collector'" or other ' - existing streets, shall be set when the cenesrline alignment of taid "collector" or other street has been established by or for the City: 14' * 2) Center of all eul-de-sacs; -11 4 ,3 • . FINAL ONDER NO 86-02PC - PAGE 5 \1-4' a".": s4 1 S .`. . :::` t . 111 010 ' . -. 3)) Curve points, points o, inte,'section (P.I.) when their y position falls inside thc limits of the pavement �. otherwise beginning and enr.�i1 points (8.C. and E.C.). 4) All sanitary and storm location shawl be placed in •: , positions that day not interfere wth centerline �y monumentation. 15- A Sensitive Lands Pe raft sha11 be required for any encroachment into the 100 year floodplain or construction in drainageways or ,slopes over 25%. r; .' ` 16. Lot 12 shall be subject to the setback and height requirements for flag lots contained in Sections 10.96.090 and 10.98 of the Code. d 17. A tree cutting permit shall be obtained from the City prior to . removing any trees over 6 inches in diameter. :. ' - 1S. After review and approval by the Planning Director and City • • " Engineer, the Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington County, ,"'. ; 19. This approval is valid if exercised within one ear of the final _ a " .�.. 1 decision date noted below. N M ; M • • ' It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this -. Order. • IIIL P��,�sED, This � day of .�-�: 1086, b� the Planning ', Commission of the City of Tigard. + ,I A a A. Donald Moen, President : : Tigard Planning Commission •. ( SL:bs87) t": rJ CD CAM + 5 I j., ,e. °- FINAL ORQFR ND. 86:. -02PC — PAe E 6 4 r t t . m ♦ ?{. y'�y'` T""°1,:'+ 4 i " J! • •W '. ` ' y ,�� ." �, ,•. .,.. > l r •i r t . , .t + A / ; " V • 141' N � y 1-86 t ; SCE 186 S 3-86 S 1 ' D ,a �. -fit Co. Marti 1Tos Signs I L. e,r - Lincoln Savings & Loan 31 Commercial 'St,. SB 8875 SW n-Hillsdale. Hwy. . .. . 10250 SW Greenburg Rd. S em OR 97302 Portia , gt 9725 ? Tigard, OR 97223 KAIZE PERMANRNTE kpas�ii Eton Co t y Dist.School Di . Norm Harker et. L - • 3600 o ztiterstate, give. P.O, B. 201 1 1750 SW Skyline Blvd. '. Port and, OR 97227 ! Beaverton, t.' 97075 j Portland, OR 97225 c Geraldine all [ Ralph T:hran Guy ;Idunt 11515 SW 1st Ave. 17355 S^' t •on:s Ferry 950C SW Riverwood Lane Tigardv R 97223 Tualatin, SR 97062 f Tigard, Ok 97224 w � ,a i �. Ed Tr- ht•nbarg , Liz Collins • r ' 11490 SW ingwood 1 16545 SW Copper Cr. ,, Tigar• OR 9 23 1 Tigard, OR 97224 l. 1 - e ' 11' Lou Faan�, Sa l 8575 SW ��e- erton H ll daley *1c ! 9505 SW Rivex'waod Lane Tigard, 0' "7223 1 Tigard, OR 97224 John Steens ' Dan Lesue n. ♦ 11725 S , ►tingwood 9540 SW Riverwood Lane ,�� . _ ' Tigard, R 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 F ; e , ' a Stephani Forsse'rg Phil 7asteris ,...:..: p �' 2 Tigard, OR 97223 St. 1 11985 SW S r n_ .,oocl 8935 SW Pinebr ' Tigard, R 97 , g , 223 EL Ot , f-`,;" Bo'�5ar , ,.� 11 3 S 11 th L�� Tig. , 97223 ILI f ' r M y , P . ,I I. '.14.71.q w . .� �, ..' r Y ss :,. n ,; „!•. ^.�'.'• 1N a .. ..... .4.. . . •,. 0 - • • . 1 . , .-n • -. l• CITY OF TIGARD , ... Washington County, Oregon .. ,... ',.. - . NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMISSION 46c . 1. Concerning Case Number(s) _ S 1-86 •. - . .- - .-„, ... .-: 7 _:-, 2. Name of Owner:. _Lincoln tajdiautsAI.sagt______________ -... .,., . i. ": , . .. 3 Name of Applicant: Same _ . Address1025011Gred. City POrtland StateOR Zip 97223 , 4m Location of Property: ,.. . • .. . Address West of 92nd Ave. between Kneeland Estates II and Cook Park . •• , .. .. Tax Map and Lot. No(s). (2S1 14A lot 900) .. 5. Nature of Application Request tv divide 8.68 acres into 18 lcts with a minimum size of 7,500 sq. ft. • ....., ,. , . . .:, .. ' q • -i!"."':• 1.....a...........ermarro■No. sa...........eff mmeriewsui.thaapa■rnasma*, 6 6 Action: Approval as requested . - . JUL._ Approval with conditions .............. Denial • '*. 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and ..„,•..,. .,,, • . mailed to: ,.... XX The applicant & owners XX Owners of record within the requl.red distance ...J. -"Av...,. XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected go"/einmental agencies *..-:'. ....)' '. 8. Final Decision: , . ., .... . . , , .. - :4- THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON March 10, 1986 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be . . cl. ' obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, E2 P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. . • 11.- ' .., f) •' ' ›.. '. 9* ±PP.!al.1.° \ , . • ...... ' Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with (9 .... ,.'. 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal .: ' • ii may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and bent. i .; ...I . . , . , the deadline for filing of on appeal 11,s March 10, 1986 4:30 PM . , 10. Questions: If you hare any questiona, please call the City of Tigard .• .. .--..i. .. -.: aanning Department, 619-4171. .‘ '''Prj: 4•'-:: ..-...J- - (0257P) , . ' ,. , ' • :.....It. '.„ lot , 0 0 r.' . cirtoFTIFARD •.. ., ...: : - _-• - \ , WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON -,,,:, , • ''-'4... - .,,, • . SUBDIVISION APPLICATION '...':',..• ?•.t!-'.‘ CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 -1';'',•,. ' .:: Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. i /..___.: 1.4.5.1.-- . . • „, R d 3 MOO 11 ECEIPT NO. IDS-- t9 r-,..-. .,.:.:. „(4.,.., .. , ,•.': : APPLICATION ZA DATE; Z ACCEPTED BY ,ISS ., ... '.. . , ' 74.. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION . App ication elements submitted , • - ' - PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION (A) Application form (1) 11171•••••■•■.■■••■••■• • . 1 . (B) Owner's sign6Iture/written -... .. . :i.. .. TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO 'le 11 / authorization — - 1 '4') Title transfer instrument (1) •. '... ...,,,..." '• SITE SIZE 3.4,40444Acres________ .v/S,O) Assessor's map (1) ..,:;•%..- PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* Linada4.4144.Lnati ( ) Preliminary Plat (15 copies) .. ., ADDRESS Iloall_sw_Exaenbung_Rd. PHONE ..._245,airaL_ ) Applicant's statemint vl „ CITY ZIP __ ___22223 (15 copies) :...-.zt".....f... APPLICAPT* ,.. .., t., (G) List of property owner's — A ir"...., ADDRESS (1_:-.1013c 0245-7 PHONE \NI within 250 feet (1) CITY 42L1L.,, ZIP CilAP..:3 _. (H) Filing fee ($250 plus $5 *When the owner killd the applicant are different per Lot) people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record 7' .-...... ' .,-.1 or a lease in posse6sion with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: ,Il :„.'. from the owner or an agent of the owner with written •1 1" f. 1.' authorization. The owner(s) must sign this 1 g2 ; application in the space providod or page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. 4 co .. COMP. PLAN/Zr DESNATION: 2 PROPOSAL SUMMARY - 5 .3 .- ....................._____—_-- i ...........................---, ............. -. . The owners of record col the subject property • .. request permission to divide a g N.P.O. Number: ... , .,,., .... i (Total Area) ....1 parcel into .____:is..___ __ lots between Preliminary Plat Approval Dattt ,. , ... :. (number of lots) __44.5,0a_____ mt square t in stze. '•:. ' Final Approval Datek„ _ . ., 161,-- Planning . ' 1:6 '.,,,,, .• '..• Engineering . , ... ...I: ? Recording Date and Number: ' • 411 • 3. List any variance, Planned Development, Sensitive Lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this spprication 4. Applicants: To have a eomplate application you will need to submit attachments • described in the attacbaci information shut at the time you submit this "w• application. • THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT A. The above ,I Lequest does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached ro or imposed upon the sub.1ect overt B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above stateme,its and the statements in the plot plans C• attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are trues and the applicants so acknowled;;se that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revokd If it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the eneire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understa ds tha requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this ,...821:?, dT;y of :r�wws.�. SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. •0000/0010.000.7.000004000M010.06100.0.10.100•00000■• 0000010.4116.1.0000.00w/1/000,01 • • ■ • . o ,ti ri (KSL n pn/V52OP) gip... • , ...- , , 410 0 Si, -1, d pi t ', ,,. . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 0. ` '' ' STATE OF OREt►1N ) • -- County of i achiugton ) ss. • City of Tigard 1• ' %, . - I C LajilL )4 LL being first duly sworn, en oath depose and say r 'I Please Print) That Iama ,. _. / iC... .,„ for •.y _ .r .,,? The City of 'fig d Oregon. That I served notice of Public Hearing r for Tigard City Council. of which thew attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit /A) upon each of the following ,�.. w,eamed ersunn on the 1,2,. day of 411,4L1-11,12-". 198 , b mailing to ... . p day y F ? each of he at the address shown on the attached lia Z Marked Exhibit E), said notice as here -o atta hed, dep ; {ited in the United States Mail on b ' j2:2___,. the day of /I (1A /., _ , 198 , postage prepaid. { . • . yA. '' 11.2:-.6L- t,-----___ e - .., r 1�f {1ey�Q _, + ` S r a,1.e4.e l�eiw .. _ - ,-. .,-.. . ,.. a i yl •d Q ? TA4 _ ,"� person who d tr vered to POST OFFICE ,.. a; a Subscribed end sworn to before me on the day of , 1Q8 . - ; 1 ' ai ..� ' I. TART PUBLIC OF OREGON Y ra`*W'e4 1� Hy i Commission Exprel,t 22-J:.„,_____ 7,7 A e i,• . a (0257 Pt) • @ yt • , .. I . 11 ".. 1. • 4 40 t"--•kk„',V--fr. A , ., ‘.. . •,.., . - - . • . .. • . . . . ., 1' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING og - • . . ; ; NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, ., March 24, 1986 AT 700 , IN THIZ LECTURE ROOM OF PIMP•••■•1140.■,...■■•••••••PIIII P■••••01.00 FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, 10865 SW WALNUT, TIGARD, OR., WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION . . .. \P" ' 4 st: - FILE NO.: S 1 - 86 : . . : APPLICANT: LINCOLN SAVING' & LOAN OWNER SANE - . 10250 SW Greenburg Rd. , Portland, OR 97223 . ...'.- 7., . . . - -.! REQUEST: By NPO # 6 to review on appeal an approval by the Planning Commission of a subdivision dividing 8.68 ,.. . acres into 18 lots with a minimum lot size of 7,500 sq. ft. . This will be an "argument-type" hearing only. . .. The Council will consider only the i'ecord before the Planning Commission, which is on file at City Hall. , ..... . . The Council shall riot consider any ncw testimony or evidence which is not in the ecord in accordance with ' Section 18.32.320 of the Tigard Municipal Code . . IL , ed tit.; (See map on reverse side) . ,., LOCATION: ' of e.„"nd Ave. between Kneeland Estates No II and —I ,,e0 ;c, ' ,'", , (WCTM 2S1 14A lot 900), . -. -- al ' (9 THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIb HATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED LN ALCORDANCE !JIT1 THE ,.., .„„ji RULES 01" PROCEDURES OF THE CITY COUNCIL. , 4 . " . ?.. TEWri,NONy MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE EUTERED INTO THE RECORD. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORDER OR PLADINING DIRECTOR " AT 639-4171 CITY O TIGARD '..- 12755 S.W. Ash Avit. TiSardo Or*gou 97223 . . (corner of Ash fs 'Int:ahem.) (0272P) , .., , It r' , h, . y , t' •„/' A' f"I ' I N14•'Y•rk '�f }1 h, •• t1 i `11i^w>ra tVf tI d w` Y+.Y+ Y. w 1�, 4 11. ,.I.. ,.',;u~ n yy(�JJ ww /r N , `n li +� ,Y ♦,r. ,,.r � 4..«4 �..•t ,,�I•rsl,c..wY.I,;Y v4�J "•in•." -, y' .,4L C,.ht .�. .,}+ , ..: c. ..a,1:.-. • ...r> . ,.. ...w.., ., 61q.: ; ff4' V"'• �:;. •' r ai M�� • !'i'+•;(''�7 .P •. the•1., yrut s,.,...•,..,. ,. y.� , "', 1 1 J Fd ;.Y},y ;y e ,' ., t' d 9+♦`,, A l N, ,i,p C,.: y/ ��11A7 ,.. .1,./ ._,,,..Y» w' 4 . r: .�� .7Y.rY �: •,1 .�, '�'�'�{ � „/� ! �' ta! >j . :Lyy,ri. ' �. ...,1A `r+ a `\`}pp1 r w ,� r r 1 a«' 1 w.,n }} 1F ,-t 0, +'!1•+'w, �T.,r. ,idig 7r7,,,A,. t r , P.'1 ,4.. r b' ,�!.f,q� is•', i, .:y •?,1 C, •"'�L ''d,� r. et..i �C"A lr' .a4..' . `` r 'A 'r ,F' rr,«r`,,.. R j., «.I� Y! M I ..�s ,. :t Ir ,,fir t, lu r '�r r "'S'i 1,".,n 'a• t Y,( 9,M yf.iClx '. ,rt, �.� .1.iT, L. +« a,,'.r.Y ,,t 1« ,,:�. r p". �+"�•� 4iJti 2.r1S �.:, J ,., „,r' +:: N �iY1 i r e'. ...,�1a�� 1 YVy r M t �'�}1r ”( L 1 I11YG iLf r` {{�..,, ^rIL 4 x Y• :. Y.v , ,;, a 4r, ,r ;, ;. r...,Y CO!'o 4{ ,; •. .�./.�J_f ;�"�' " ,,a{ , ,n4C1 t x,:, C„ .:., :..r,:r -5 i1,. ,'{,. , :,. ,.,.r ,„�,y. ,. '•J� r,, r:, :Y . uuP„� Ls�> ,,.. �,• ,"J..'!r � ;.:rt� r+,Z ,.,a ,!{�, 1' �...,;: , ,,,a`� 1'� . r 7.� �,°:"bi,,.t,S•'.1, .• No. . 4,, , ,,�;,• .•' •r,iyr �. �'., ., ,h .:ti ) Yr'If!`A'„{,�'�' � +'' .Yr,- v t. 'j•F" w 'w,i-',, ,. .,t' 1.N, w � . : -ntii. :-... J_.,, t{:_.I.aw ,�/!.�.':�r '','t!, Y .;.•.,n '!�/± J �,.a''" �.+iFj!y f.n ,',,,,7,,,•, "N.- ��,�.+±,1�..� 't :�.4� ry tW,, r.. . - , ' ra ti4��;.. ,•tJ .L r,^ .a. n N:r.. "�, r , r[�yr rJ`,, " r, '. �(''f'' .,.w»'.*..� la. "r' ?,1 •. . , w' .. e t'ji.- ,r. •,. C, r .,i,_.• ,".-:. ,44,;! s,4';"� .!.. a1. ",I 1 'M,+ I°,' ::Y„r 'RY. ,LA.+r.f, •r 1 .'�'--~». ▪-,1 r , .M1.. y Y ,i�Jf,•rY u,{'r�iri .. ;.,•.”'4 �,(n � t. ,t .'7;4' "�ay.' �"; '. w .M.. '•t°. '!. �",..P _a '�I _ •t ,71'11.':::" L`t 1 ,r" ,. 7'° 1 �.' ,YU'f, 4r,J : y A., ,.tl;' 4:' ,� {1 I,,r:�, W. ,�", i.. ,{ tr,�+ ,' It'q.�P��' e ,4� hL' 4: .�'i' ! .,,P ,�«' , ,.f t.h•+,� 1 ri 1 :� !•fit,« r r r,�. "'r .sir•., t m .1 .r: ,,,1 r 1 #,.-•.1„ i .1 d..y '�'i,'�li+'..M •N I:y f rf, Y � `/"{ ,.1 .i.:. ,it..,,.- +,�H Yi � l,h! ,• "� ,�M'. ✓,�. "'�L•+«« ,M1 �I, ••�'• '7- 1 ,t 1 �{ e -"ri Y !, .w �r.� ..Z1,.'"„1r' T� ''r t^.+�"Y".'"r.,,rM D11�1 rf,y ry ;+J ,. � ^r�...� .� t }7ly A 4i r"v1'�� va:J:.JI/ ••.' w !w, �' P'N, '',,,,q.', Y,.. t4 ..'i` rh ..t.l Y+ „Y ClI / Jf W, I, �, , u(� Y+;r,...r «.H ,.. i 1 „„1.; i'S""� ,.ywY,r(,.:�,i '}!Ci f,r::;' D '.rl,.,.wa .t:.., .+,,,,,•L•,L•i.:.r...... +..,.Yr, yr� .,�, rr. ' y1F� ;4' r. 10' 1 ��r. 1•,�. un;r:F F,PC.'. r 1: _ ,n ./, ti Y t S��.;t, h«�.. ,Y .'rti •,•1 ' rN'1 ':Y. 1'h`V'11.,, At 1.' {t,i1 1::`.w. „` ".'','. • `—'7•"--J. '�"S L }`. 6 �r�.t E,,a •i, .4,,,,,'''..,. y'rI'r tS1W �: ar y blYtNr '1 ',J. r,,�l rtr..i•;,1,...�I,)� ��•C• i' +' : ,; ;r' "` ,. 4.. 1a 4 . yr. ' '.if l �,.r r 'I ;y,lit ,'-',71; r i J YYY '1 ,+ z .a • • ^�, .M • ": . 1....,...,•11,...,Y,,`� ' pb 1 '.A,•i{ t 'Y � f1 -1'�1 ,, a A 1 ,.,,,,,;....,,,,,,:...-4... f„'1 t .,.y�1 • :: , r.,. t,,w iw ..�.,.M" � 1 ' .. ,.•..�1.•.M♦ 11• � m''.,,,MLI ++ , Ww ri "1 ':4 ". .w,1 .t v , .+ a .A H J »y F�ri..l,{`r...l�H� ,,. '•." '. �' 1'.�r;`,.t t 7 „'C K' A i Y .q '!r N Mw'' AL +•r:C,.+.,.. «a:°'•/ r vi L`YE At IGrr.yµl� UN. ' M« ! I S 1Y :)O A t • ^+1! uf -. Iaw «..r('Jj " J - yf" M JRN Q' q �K;�d ' y, ;�N,G[ "+.•.• .� u,+�l;Y Y�::1 Z `! f��, r a-�fC:t y., 't: 11 ! .i 1 ,�._ ,�. �� '• / ,. , • a y Yr Tb /�+. Y 5,. 1' 1� ' ar t�' Ste» d `� r. ..,I • . ...„,,,,, ,, 4!!! M /1 1( ?& : cJET,rk1, .irk 1 �K�/ �� ,#7 t ,i `, r , ' 1\� r ' , `M Lr a<f,"Jy ;J, ,`*✓r{,*4,,,•t i 4 1 1 rq Pv �[ .• .. .•0,` \ !{ 1 t (71,„,•„ir• i' r `V t,.••z, 1 ( ] t C�IC�RC661L1J — ,1 Vi,::� f f y a ,` ':” '1,I.+1rl `{• .1.'��{dk ,r y ,.'J '�t x ', `'. ) i 1 1 i.'. 4 @t/IY ' ..t r .G , Y r r!�Y�/''bl.J,.,.;�«�` .W yp ('-j 1 1.�� 1 i V�r LIC� t.', 7L Jj',�1�1. II''/ r �".A . • i- ...it r .,.�.. .a.�.,. ,, �,rsjq�L „-,,,-,—,6-t w , 1 • •r �` , i'"�, V,J a 1 r j ,.w4 5., 1", { .,,� • .;..1 , • ' -1.{D,►,,'i'1,T+f T'....t. ,, '_ '' �. c tit\• '~,_.4 1..,v),:7.1— -' t! : , ` ar, ,' . `", n• .,) t,� '1 1 1 I - '` - ■ Lfr. "►__� l�.r.,,.1_�,J`, — 1.q... '.Yt� J t;l6.1,i �AtlK �p ,'I,Ty �;, i f- �' ... ,1 t _ ,.�0,, ,'�„Y... , 17. .�-,, '`r,, 11 ('��AC tl.�, ,.6';r '9; tr.AAir�.:, _'.. ...rti:n.^ ,,' I I f ,.;A, � t,,rw 1..1�L.Y ,j !•� G �� r } L � r ,,�.�, 1., r f f �p � ::�"' r J �f a „"p"rt,,'Y r,� � , 1 �s ,c�'r r',p �;t, { ,• r ; .1�' T Y. ..1i r!+ M`rl.y t;T .,.11 M ,,,,..#.,,,1 4"rtil '„„I g.; C,t t{ ,1 '' .r 1. ,t! qJ ! �• •_•-‘r•. 4. , !!•,','y i, t i Ct UN L.,,; `,,,,(, 1^^r,1,1 • r.1.11...4,. .,e;L.,i/•' '.?4, y !/U,N % ' i Ci .sue{... ;" r:1,� ,- -.' .r'. '�r<47 rirt,'& wA '7'....y.',.�7 ',• El 11 t Nl,l t A i o• , = , �,� .,. .r ...�.. .. t u` ...41.11 t r . ,k Y ?t i rtI F,JW r - l'..•� ~!`` J r PRE f Y �, A �r11 caw ,Y ' k 1. I" �ll h { `+ \+°'� ��ti,.. •�I.; " t • p 1. Sl'' r 1 W 4 Y" V 1 l' ,6;,,,,1,, �� FW1.Y��4 ,V ( ,�4 r. •1 `t' 1"), .4. 0' 4 �� Iw\, ^ 4 `� ,» ,t Later ' �, .,' 4,..„,:‘,...,J,.by+r A r �a�f— ~, • . t, it//,G` ti r: J 1 r r.. ,.i r !'� , ,., ( 1, 1 ,, y ✓r' ,! ,.'. r ,1.1, ) Itt ,,/1 \j 'a1 I,✓ • 1 r ti j , 2 t 1 1 f t 1 4, r j y.r Il (( � t NY r 1.1 , ,, . ... _.,., ...)L ,-1• I,,rk ..,./"..,,, 4. , 1 r h ri. On 7 f .4" � 1 ♦,. `r: 1. . t r ' • I �yr' 1: 1 1 � J �M r 1 r`� `;"_ ' C JY+, re r r O,� �, ,4 i 1 ,,;r " ;0 k• , ,• ■r" ;..Y.± 4 , j ''`,/,* .-i I �y' Ha w..a y' �: 1 i. n,•'. r 'r �"t r»U tit"...lit r J 1 k s iJ•"•k,'" ,.1 Y13 r 1.b 1r{• r 1 ; `i., •o r '4 ,,,..t.., 4, . 1 1 �, r P ,, . . ` ` .`""-. t/ r,r'h� `,1:;,ydy :.� '4,a w:r(.a,.tY,r7yk;�N'�,Yf,4a ., '4 ,,:. ,.,4 1 r,. ‘ y�. is, , i.al, i,t••,,.)1•. .,,\,'- rP+• _-r.., `t 1 ,' r .r1 'ar,• Jii'•m h G , IA•• 1, ^ r! .' ,f ' :.1 r�,• t� .... r� J.. � '? " Ph11 'as ter is 4 410 8935 SW F inebrook St:. x'. 97223 .. 1, Tigard, �It r. • ' Ae Kneeland Estates III ".. ti.; Navarra Clark Lincoln Savings and Loan Joseph J and Aaris Harold and Edith P.O. Box 23457 9400 SW Millen Drive 9410 S.W. Millen Drive Portland, Or M ♦ r Ti gird,Or 97224 Tigard, Or 97224 97223 Marsh Custom Homes by Dave English .• ,-. •:• Stephen and Rebecca Rt. 3, Box 253 Joan :r `• . 4586 Comr s Newberg, Or 16495 SW 93rd 1 Portland Or 97219 97132 Ti ��' .�a H � gar-d, Or 97223 . L. Al I • 7 Homma Kel s'y Manning .. . -, s ave and Kristine Cl i 4for ' and Phyllis Ph s Patrick and Mar y L. 16520 SW 93rd 9580 SW Riverwood Lane 9560 SW Riverwood Lane "' ' " Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 Ti gird n Or 97223 :-.7 ';',..'. . ...' Leslie Kelly Mount Daniel S. and Caroal. Mark B. and Gail E. Guy III and Diana L.' 7935 SW Fanno Crk Dr r 9520 SW Riverwood Lane 9500 SW Riv9rwood Lane Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97224 Ti gar-d, Or 97224 u yyvvv�..��www• •y F^` rb h. Arroyo Tualatin Development Mint Homes Inc. Y 90 . 0e and Sally Ann 15300 SW 1 16th Ave. 16090 S Gl ennwood Ct. 9505 SW Riverwood flood Tigard, Or Lake Oswego, Or j '-�.$ Ti.g urYd a Or 97224 97223 97034 t. County aque Peter-��c.►,�-r • • ,• ' ,, .Steven J. and Nancy Fred M. anl Dana Lynn Terry and Barbara J. 16550 SW Cooper Cr 16540 ,SW Cooper � rk Dt . 1652Q Copper tr k Dr.''.4'. ..s.„ w Tigard,r d, Or 972 4 Tigard, Or 9722 Cooper p 1• • �d,: g g g Tigard, Or 97223 . .,• � . Y. Gal s r :amad ; irk , ; , .r Marcia A. Q. Daniel den and Marie Kenneth H. 4 10593 SW Century Oak w 9530 SW Millen Drive 9510 SW Millen Dri ve . 0: ® Tigard, Or 97224 Tigard, Or 97224 Ti gard, Cr 97224 .4 r,,,rd Wilson 1 scan L?otrga�. l . and Connie Jahn and Marilyn r I- h7„ - 16 OQ 157 5W Lat�wel '�' �. .� i�""�` : SW 93rd Ave.A�^e. •, �.✓�` �°� a ti ar gy: ,� .� :,• . j avert r �' G� � � .,.,� r^ ,� g r 97224 D� on. C1 97�t 5 Perrin ,1' erri n `r Thomas W and Doris Jean Norm Harker ••I 16585 SW 92nd Ave. Al a ?an anQ:erin Tigard Or. 97224 T ? dsct 23J P c Hwy 1750 •�W Skyline Blvd. Y <'' 'j Tigard Or. 97224 Por l,< i:d, OR 97'l21 , , Liz Cc�1 i• , 1� .nU Dan Lague 9540 SW Riverwood . 16545 5i' Capper Cr Dr. d Lane ` o.., ..° 'H ar.r1 OR 9722h ''iiarc1 , OR 97224 , ..f,7" •.+ •.._,..TM ....•,.,, rr• e� .w '_.. ;� a. ... ,rl,s. '` r 1 . �..s• •.I•..." y. '�. -- .+t}' ... "AI Y'e.' +.1.-_�. 'y.. 111.t.,_. +' s,e 0 , . ..-. .. ' ' S /46 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING P 11 w , . • 4 STATE OF OREGON ) =,: -• County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard q ....r, y . *!,... / < ( , being first duly swornt on oath Ilopose �► sat" Pleas Print) / 1 1...._.. That I am _ � • � ,� �V .� for The City of • 1.1: , Oregon. That I served notice of Public Hearing el Tigard Planning Commission. of which the attached is f copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persona on the 2� day of mailing to 1'9E a by �i�ailira ., ' . - each of them at the address shown on t We attached list Marked Exhibit E), • said notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United States Mail on » the day of , 198 , postage prepaid. ' IA jik.ii:L.., . Sign ture • Person who deli� ered to POST OFFICE t q ..: : .. r w A Y.T x LL x i Subscribed and sworn to before me on the / ` da of .� ..:�....d... 198 . ,, ;/.. 03 ,• NOTARY PUBLIC OF ORE K II c My commission Expires: �4 ••• ... (0257P) yc . • •' •• ¼g'. • ' .'x'. . •-" i , .,. d r.! '-'..Y _ _ -.-.. f11 ••..v • -. •+r"_,►. ,e ...a .. _.. .r'�'.. _ r n.t� a p..._.: h..., , ~ . . 1 . 0 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING . • Notice is hereby given that the Tigard Planning Commission, at its meetihg on 4., ' A'. '''' room of Vowler Junior High School, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, will consider the following application: FILE NUMBER: S 1-86 Nti- APPLICANT: Lincoln Savings & Loan 10251 13W Greenbu7:g Rd. OWNER: Same REQEEST: To subdivide a 8.68 acre parcel into 18 lots, with a minimum lot size of 7,500 sq. ft. , on prop rty zoned R-4.5 (Residential 4.5 units/acre). 9/\_, :.,,,, . ,', . . LOCATION! Between Kneeland Estaten and Cook Park, west of Tigard , ( High School (WCTM 2S1 14A lot 900) tit ac 40 , The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Community Development Cod,e and rules of procedure of the Planning Commiarionb Any persons having interest in this ; , ::tter nt.7y attend and be (1.• :T,:estimon.T may be submitted in writing to be i''.. ull For further information pl6ase contact the Planning bepartment at 639-4171. 1, ...2 TIGARD CITY HALL, 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue (Corner of Aah Avenum & Burnham 7 ,.. Street), or contact your Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) # 6 ' •" i: . � .57..),1 6 _ .,,. ... . c a INCf i i ' Si 1 i _. 1 C 7 ! mI i 1. i ' [aw,iaii W . ,y I .. 1 ,. owfta kb ,.4 I . l t o 1 e y ir ' I � i , „rr i ' e i. .fir • ', 1 r t ° r M 1t(t+ 14C r r t. j /i'IfE6RDQ� f1. m a . y � "" _ , to''''''' , , 'I. 1.... —I t•J .I ? ! .1, a __ M E .1` ®uC`...Z»..{'°.:.i i,,,:-.A .�, t y 1` 'I '• 1 1...�. l w r f ., Jy G rc r a t3'PE 1 r37A', 'A,�' r 1klAl 0 J 7, ff.•1 t _a t ,a■ C 1 � l 1 �� •F j`�r r .ril -W Qfry'I c+ �Y j ,.,_ 1 , 1 i I 1.t'^f r ,5'Cr,ori., •,iltil Shtl I'in , kw4 tit r �. .f J i 1 E 1 . W r. ," ,I S� , L t • ' N 1 I ./". r , , ,�1 r� h I 11 , .law., y t �(IL∎"r4 •f 1 etu I 1 1 ui "� j.. #;; /i } iL!'i4 .J II F'.i,f,.,1 e,,DTI,L, t. .. I 1 1.h' .4 ( I,, 1. ttt - n ' I. .r t.., "I f y,.J . '' i )', t. 1 a ' , ' I ., I «, ,,,, t 9 1i R SS 1 hTNEyT k r ..., ., 1 . ! m I I j 6 1 1 ' �• ' 1. 1 ! .` t 4 ' it 1 --.t �.:,..' ��--1•J „ i I 1�...1.°) ' ,.L � ' 1 ■ Y' r 1 l i W . r 1 1 + y l ^` v_, ' i '� ' aN t,rLk ': > '� U `t�'�(7 MN LU +'� 1 !.'41:4 r .. �,.._,..,__: 1 (, • . '-'» _ ty y 1 ' ***-i'''.4'44113: ''•••,' o• t L} +`f i +J I f( kl ,t 1 ! f 4i '1!1 • I i A r1 J11, i.,t;T�� )...4-1 r ' -,' ''• •••• ' • • i•I f , I p---,:.• ., ..i. ......1-...„.._„„,,- . •••••''''" „----c7,4,,,, 1 i ,g, I" ..... I b i a f"'v"'-• .'' , 1 l I ■1y? -Y.1 j,t 1,• n•1 ` 1 • r.,' i..«+ Sty . .YF8:,;)\ ('1;:1, i,1 ,-,. k a W tOKF►JRN y ; L_ , `v�a a'r♦.� ,;, . .� F ,:.i ' \.,–\\S-- \e�+"„.•‘• s Y r •` l�,'-/►'• '. r r q' k + - ,... • ..•a� -, `,r}k :�*y, ��,, ! k..,•.' r� l J>'{..'� � d .� �• '• ` ,'"i .. 1 1.i r..� .... , S �,fp, "`' r :A';:.:\ " :^•r.1-,r (..(I y t .' ' 1 'r41+ `d ,/a. ,t L}r^ ( \iatl 1 .! ., tx•�(I . �..'7 r 1 ♦ ♦�....t �J 1 .t .,r rt (,F 7, w 'Y �••( }})`.- V t..'1 ....1..• • ,,r''}'�, .i K��}J',y,4,..a ' e '''',..1, ��. N v e_ iy+ �yy ?t ;l I i f s CHURCHILL 1 c\\.,... flil V•1 . / (''� t ,�1 t t I I4 ....1 >',4?.. 1 '}a\"•~ '}'`••ii f' 'r 4'''"+.Jti' �` ' 1 '1 I 1* ! I P .t' .aNO w( L+ • i ,t..',7 4. !t f' ! .. '' r r' '','' `)' (.rr ti::N'• r ,;^.. ,.... 1 ) I. - •.•- 1. ,A,l. 4k.1. .. ,,• ♦ Y,,, ) ,';; • , }.-.,.,.«{ I I // v, n,7 t,• ,r...`} y• r,� , F, r \ r ,,;,f • i 1 • I • , ,,,.i 9 r7 T-+.r ,,! ,/ t ul 1l+`` ,r,l�'.i i t! � 'r `ft/ .1 1. , ,i) 1 i 1-,, } i 1 1' 1 1 r t 1 (-4.,,,,,4.4,.......`# " +,,,f +,f 1 y t ,�..�•. .t > I 0' } r'' . ., ' + ' Z I C .+ . 1 �.., i. - • ,e a ,11 F..4,ti I ^ ' 'It } r 1 , y °1 t, ,..,%..,-i r' 1 t F t { t t J " . � ii -: t 't, •..' ... � t /fill ►'1,M�. { y ,.11....-...,..i �....»., r }._� n ►. 1_ '_ .. - "_ •� `1 f-7-7,, y I��J^. 5'M. + �OUINAA1 .., I 1,., .,.,,y" 1,11P1 _M �,'443..1.I.J InA, � �.. 7 f { i� L •" T/G 4f7U I " f t ,`d46 j ° t.W�ter,`•r■a i w`'' t ,t lov " _. I 1 w aW tit I NI6N I. ti t ,l. 1 , + Cr 4rQ' t `i'1 kµ 'gin Isi I j a .I r>.' K - .. `+,... , j ,3.f. i 4 e ,i ,v`,.+.,i..•.i—ITT-1-,1" i:» l..I�. .5,,,1c,i.i. 1 1 �'" , e ' �! <��+1401. way( ---k 1--,tl✓'.. ,, +.-, i -,,4t d i\--1 ,, 7- i !RE t r"+N6NT ? jli N.y I'' ,M•,;."7/' ,,:.I' •,._'•4--1.,_f.�I.J. po 't ` .4A-1.1 D',1_,,,,,11"-..„' _i-... • r�. I f•,/�,/,kk� l 't 111 T r tL yr rT� ■ ',„. r i �f`.1„,, '✓f Y yr<r ! I / I • ^r .. ...777 1Y11 1 , .” 1 , �.., �r,��,_., . r' 7 c-- '' ,.,..,, ,..,. 1t i , i ,.�t•'r A .r N f i.,J. i 1 r,,•,- `'i:,� o t� J 1 t.. .. ." , � � i tAi),, :::* . L ,. r r SF ,t . . / y 1 }.1,1, Ili . , 6'061? ■ 1 .• 4 ; 4.. S ,..,. , ,, 48 r y r t' 4*. r' r 4, J PA X71" _ .�. ! W/ , ! .Y,• + t ,'C 4 # /1 () i,,,. ..,, ,. ,I , ,14 c,4 . .r."I"I., i' 4 ' y":L 4. "4* a. 1 ,,•, t1`` / mss""ri--.i r,r- _p+.r''' i 1•«. -7---.!---,:.-,,,,,,,,,i• . � I f r - .♦ fib, - __ -- w. .._ .... . .a_. • Phillip Pasteri .s ., . .,• glai935 SW Pinebrook st. 0 . ..;..,.:: . 11Wdgard, OR 97224 " ''''-i-..; ... ::'. -', . • 1 ,..... : ; ..., . , :: Kneeland Estate III '1,33L6 'JO P4e61.1 ' . ... Clark Lincoln Savintjs and Loan saIV PLVA MS S8S91 . .. Harold and Edith P.O. Box 23457 tmeri spiv ptle im seulogi .. .,..-r• -1- ° 9410 S.W. Millen Drive Portland, Or i ut4Jad . , . • .. ligard, Or 97224 97223 , .., ... , ,„.' , • • ,, ...,_5(6, , . 2 . . .. 0 -.4'........, , !re ' A f, xo... akif .. , .. ... - - Custom Homes by Dave English 11 , ' 61 1; . - . .. Rt. 1 Box 253 Joan - • ,.. . %.-:. Newberc', Or 16495 SW 93rd ••:',9...0'-? 97132 Tigard, Or 97223 ".. ...: ‘-.., Kelsay Manning trZZL6 JO 424w15T1 ., .,: . N 4wO AJrniu"..'3 MS GagOT .„$47 ' . . la "V WT2JWW i ' , • , C1i4ford and Phyllis Patrick and Mary L. • JoiaTeg "„, „,,- .. T.• 9580 SW Riverwood Lane 9560 SW Riverwood Lane : . , , '., Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard,Or 97223 - ... . ,.. , 17ZZL,6 JO 4P.21105T1 , - . , :: ,. . ,,. a 443 J& d003 M 05291 . , e AthwoN put, .r ummals • ' Kelly kount . A4,ano3 „ Mark B. and Sail E. Guy III and Diana L. 1 ' ,,.. ,. .1. . '• 9520 SW Riverwood Lane 9500 SW Riverwood Lane , Tigard, Or 97224 Tigard,Or 97224 ! i laZIAS JO 6P-Aw511 poom ..,k4(': ” . . ureliJaATu ms g06• uu0 ATTws• po Tualatin Development Mint Hornet Inc. uw 4ancl ''''' 0A0Joit, . :',. ..... 1530e SW 116th Ave. 16690 S Blennwood Ct. 1 _ .'" -..- *.. Tigard, Or Lake Oswego, Or 47703? . .. :.%'.-...-* 97223 EZZL6 JO 6PJw-07.1. : .e7'-t • Jai.n. 3 ouweA Ms g26,4 , - . .0 uAt4w0 Puw *El isTuwO - ' .* 71: Baque Pftterson ':,.. , ., k. .. Fred M. and Dana Lynn Terry and Bav-bara '''6114:- aTtsal A6540 SW Cooper Crk Dr. 16520 SW Copper Crk Dr. Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 ' PT ...... .,,. ., - ! tZZL6 JO 4P4well . P-T6 MS 0ZG9T . . . Kamada , Kirk uT;sTJA puw mAita . ... ac Daniel Ken and Marie Kenneth H. wilwoH 9530 SW Millen Drive 01 ' 9510 SW Miller Drive Tigard, Or 97224 Tigard, Or 97224 En. . -c.... • Pli 1 son CD , • Deluge,1 au Ldrvn And Connie4 John and Marilyn ,-I • .,. 6tL6 JO aPUwt4Jaci ' anwo3 98Gip . iiim.Alim 16500 SW 93rd Ave. lois° SW Laurel ** aq64 PLiv u416646 , , IigardvOr 97224 11 BeavertohoIr 97005 . , i . 4,EZIL6 JoAPJ*Iali ''',: 1 : OATIJOithistiTW MS 001,6 wpalob, Pug r Lidom0V ' ,,. ' _ .. , ,.. . ... I.J.IvAN to4,44. A. Tigard School District 23J 1'1117 SW Pacific 1.1,4 , . Tigard Ore 97224 .... . , .., ., . . 4.1.0.316VEMMOVIOMIO•Awnesw,..n...........n".......re.....■..■......■............•..., -,,,. _ ' * 1"4 ' r ,■11,;0' ' 1 4,at . ..r p■ ..1 Kneeland Estates III Navarra k L Clar . ..■ 1 . inc Ll oln avings and Loan ,z :.,..,:.'—.4: Joseh a and Aaris Harold and Edith P.O. Box 2347 , ,...1 9400 SW Millen Drive 9410 S.W. Millen Drive Portland, Or -, I:,,,:- Ti gar do Or 97224 Ti gar-d 0 Or- 97224 97223 - fi ..,,.4 '%..,.... Marsh Custom Homes by Dave Eng1i4h v, !„. '.:11`,. • Stephen and Rebecca Rt. 3„ Box 25 Joan 1- , . .4, 1. ,:... 4386 Comus Newbe,..g, Or 1649S S( 93rd .-.,= Portland!, Or 17219 97132 Tigard!, Or 97223 4.--,.; ,.. 1 Homma Kelsay Manning .4.-....,%-,, 0.4:,';'' Dave and Kristine Cli+ford and Phyllih Patrick and Mary L. 16520 SW 93rd 9580 SW Riverwood L-...ine 9560 SW Riverwood Lane .0 ',..:.f.hrlt)..,,,., ," Tigard„ Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 TigardoOr 97223 „...:,'..,,,.. a,,,I ,,, t:''.,.°.t, . Leslie Kelly Mount 1, Daniel S. and Carolyn Mark B. and Gail E. Guy III and Diana L. , .. ,k„ 7935 SW Fanno Crk Dr.#2 9520 SW Riverwood Lane 9500 SW Riverwood Lane Tigard!, Or 97223 Tigard!, Or 97224 Tigard„Or 97224 ., .., .,., , .1 ...1 .,-Ikkt", ,'..',., Arroyo Tualatin Development Mint Homes Inca .. ,-,«-' Robert and Sally Ann 15300 SW /16th Ave. 16690 S Glonnwood Ct. . -,( .,- . ,,r 9505 SW Riverwood Lane Tigard, Or Lake Oswego„ Or P,I 7, Tigard,., Or 97224 97223 97034 ,i „, , . 1 ,,',P,',,.•,",f,','": Courty Baque Peterson A; ',- ',„ i Steven u and Nancy G. Fred M. and Dana Lynn Terry and Barbara . . 16550 SW Cooper Crk Dr 16540 SW Cooper Cr Crk Dr. 16520 S Copp-r Cr Ck Di . i ,...1 Ti Or 97224 Tigard, Or 97223 Tigardo Or 97223 . . ..4, Kamada Kirk , Marcia A. Daniel ken and Marie Kenneth H. 7,■ 10595 SW Century Oak Dr 9530 SW Millen Drive 9510 SW Millen Drive sr, Tigard, Or 97224 Tigard!, Or 97224 Tigard, Or 97224 J CIIMN Tird ga Wilsson Dougall . .4 >.. Cit 04 Loren and Connie John and Marilyn Poll. Box 23397 16500 SW 93rd Ave. 10180 SW Laurel ,:.... .-1 Tigardy Or 17223 Ti gard v Or 97224 SeavertonpOr 91005 Perrin .1. —11 2 Thomas W. and Doris Jean , 16585 SW 92nd Ave. 4i ' ( Tiga d 0 97224 Tigard School District 233 12- rt 13137 SW Pacific Hwy ‘,.. Tigard Or. 97224 , i ,-., '" .."''' II , "" ,.,,, 'Y. -..%! , . . ... . . ,, .,. ., ,"44, ...",1 ' 0 . ,,. k,. '''.4.,.■, , . . ' ,. ..'"V24. 4.,-'::''''* rn, ",:i.,:' '; A:4'!",_'°, ' % 410 , 4 °,;,,,,, ',„:1 w •.y i FOR BENT'S ., .a , TO: - Jaz�ua r AI `' { rry . ...__- , �.:I ru,_.._� ,, . ....,...i�..,_. DATE: �..,_..........r... 1 O, l 98 r''" " '°'' 'R(' Tigard Planning Department ' �'' . S 1-86 A request by LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN for a r')ubdivision on property k■ � , " y tA, „` F `tp zoned R-4.5 for the prupose of dividing an 8.68 acre parcel into 18 lots■ a , wz.;th minimum 7500 sq., ft, in size. LocateeA Between, Kneeland Estates yt•tF4 tn.."V, - +w.rwdirnr H �il,�i .... a1r.is.....�w.M.1i.�M.w.� .-.... �ur�w.wrr 1'.. Ir f 4 p' ,4t and Cook Park, west of Tigard High School (WCTM 2S 1 14A lot 900) ,.: :'it .., ',., y:,a ............ ..........�.. !il 0,'.' , . Attached is the Site Plan and 8� your review. From 1 cant s statement for {!a *�t �r� 1 1, ,4. ,�-. ,-T information supplied by various departments sand agencies and from other. x„:: +;" `�"„ ,,, information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be ,I•, ` prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. ,l,,p i r ry ?y if you wish to cegmee t on this application, we need your comments by January f'� 119 You may use tLe space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments.. If ou are aanaable_ tc respond th "tn° 4; above date, please phone the s a f contact noted below with your comments and tv ;h1"j'•"": confirm your comments in writing as soon as, possible. xf ,yo;A have any 1, - quemtiiohs regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. t' b Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone, 639-4171, -f ! W.. STAFF` CO TACT. I.. Keith L�.den or Deborah Stuart I I., A' Yr•1.wrww.)•[atwwYNM- .�.r 1 i~;'. ° }w I' PLEASE CHECK The FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY . ti;„ ,,,,..,1:0,'' ,';'r We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. F =s,' w1. ” Please contact - .�. of our office. csi h Please refer to the enclosed letter. +r.1+r 1� l t , Written commentu 2 .:., � , ?+Y :,1' .f • .++.u..�.1......ir.....r. ^ 17, MIMMOVIIIMOIN 't. � ... Vii, I �i A' a" tell ,I,. ....1114.i.,�,,.,, - -... Name of Person Commenting: w,pi'~ . Phone..N ►. y i r y :::t. .t, r f�aarr f�q+�y �yy ', �+ (KSLipir /O3560 w -- u.:..-,y.,x. a-A ” ,.: iF.,.e'i!t •! "% oi:.. ,+..M' '' ■ „.,...a ''e.,h '4{II - ._ •1_ ".s-w ! , 4' {a'.' I A ' i�1 u„, n c.�{ „,,,,I,Y 4 .IJ � I." i Ly 1 { r ,4.+ .1" 'r `., ,4 r'.,ka w.w . " ",..,,k.3-* N rn . ,',N ,,:,r,""'.1 I " •'3.to f :F",',4, 5:,,.. U.r .,'..".'',4' rF w fit: , !1 yt N i.,,1 �! w.' i .rl r.::,:'1 � �� NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS z.i a t ''''''"'I'''' rt h( 1.. NPO No' APO No. r ,� w ,- ,1 ,,' 2. CITY DEPARTMENT; 't {' .r , r i Building Inspector Parks & Recreation Board , ";°x it 'f1µ4 / J. Jt Y k __,,__ /City Recorder Policts! •,.;, yt .. Engineering–Randy Other -'4..,2,-..," w' F'"1�a ; a r d t 3. SPECIA DISTRICTS 1': w 4,r, yN,, ' si .r '',',',"',-4,-;,,,,,, ' . Tualatin R.,F.P.D, School. gist. No 48 (Beaverton) w «� " Washington Co F.U. No. 1 School Dist, No 23J (Tigard) "�4. +w' G NYI Ar. ,xl l• y rM rt 1 IS y r w;w '' Tigard W.D. w..ri—r Other nw. . r. � q . 1 . Metzger W,6 !k *`tips k ,.a/ ` ! 41 x,t �t ,,',7., 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS ; ,„'4,4,"414.'''.:",--,,,' �,., 'f41 ' 2 ; Boundary Commission Wash, Co. Land use & Trans. Dept ►,• w sc 4,.-' City of Beaverton Brent Curti;( . '..''',. .;,---4.. o1�r'' o , ',' METRO Kevin Martin a , 1 I Z 4 , r rrr...�rrr�� 1, Planning Department Other t y T,�P _. ,,1.' 5. STATE AGENCIES _ rN' i r :"A '''''''''''',.'-..,.'',4 µ, f Aeronautics Di !! (ODOT) DOGAMI 5 �li�r Division of State Lands Engineer � ... .. Board of Health Commerce Dept. -- M,H. Park rr r Highway Div, – Lee Gunderson Fish & Wildlife t I ; y!''. rink { at a At M '` Parks & Recrea, Div, (ODOT) Lcnc ,,- " — Subdivision Supervisor PUC ,4I Dept. of energy Fire Marshall .1 Dept, of Erruiron, Quality Other tl 6. FEDERAL AGENCIES �. �; fill Corps .�f!Err xners Other r.4 Post eiffice 7. SPECIAL AGENCIES ref �; tith ! I ,,,, f rl, r+.........+.......r General Telephone .w.�.rwu....r. portla. rd General Electric f. Pacific Northwest Dell Other .,,I t {"� s 3 Nrthw l Ya lu riry Gas 4; :;:':::::::::*":'- ';4'' (pm/0257P) 1 r<� d` ''ak, '1 —__:. -._s_. __ , e � .11.'t1. A , k. .".".1-W,'..h i 1 6t::n.4 447:.yt.. 14.4-th,n l 1,4+F,a:. ..41`{+C.':le 1t, A dd>l.,t r t 1{l:'fl�f t6N','+" ;'p �p 1 .A y 4",", �r�S., '+�.-�'i::..J ya t „l»A ,. p 4.l j" ',,,,..4,.‘,,,,. ��t L _ y w :r, . ,, .1r °a ,! c.0!n sr8.,: * + 4k+ ? t w,,,44�4 ' 1:w a.,'1!L , ' p ! Y ti y T " 7 i t '1 14"1 r a i _ � ; 4. -, . - r y ap. _.: _ f ' '' ' ' '- ' ..,,,::'7;:;:-' ' , , f.,..„.„ . .. e,„„,,.„ .„. ifeb ''. Cit 4494 Comus Pcvotli*nos, or. 97,2 a► 6 liov 1�.0 . �i Nil ADDRESC r ti if Fi „P':41.'''''''''' s ti :...-‘,..:;,----.L.,,,',„t . ..... %v .; ^(e nx �..,',`'a CITY OF TI RD OREGON ,s. '„, p COUNCIL E oA ITEM �Vi ir�4' .tH+. i 4 IV. •lGCN i Y7 r,`1`'�r�"; ;�,•e,•' , AGENDA OF: ......3114/86 ITEM dp i (tn.) 1.‘ DATE SUBMITTED: J,/...11Z,86._ PRE4 /OUa ACTION: Commission approval ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: S 1-86 .....®, 2/4/86 '• Sr ' k L W r ^, t t , Mb .. incol n Savi r� s & Loaor e PREPARED ®Y: Keith Liden AL.— ,."`',:r • l 1 ;4 �" Kneeland Estates III) REQUESTED ®Y: e 7t' ^ . i , f�;� ,,,, DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: crri ADMINISTRATOR:: ,ter, ' � 1 wr.ww ..........1 c °orla . 'tl .oto lia aawra 4 {' 1 Y C N + s Fy y4,r It. ''AF ■ 1 k( ' 0 L.'.. IIM J rr ti''' .I M ! k c Jar n'44", . 1 tr 4 , a L Iil ' u 4 1 U *CV. ' OMMATION S, RY '','C' t! . ^ On March 10 1986, NPO # 6 appealed the Planning Commission decision to approve �>}w , 1 S 1;..B6« waived requirement for NPO # 6. A Q a,��y Y ,,r, On the same date, Counc�,�, wa�.vea the fee re ui a 7d r1 f ur.„ ri I: hearing baseu upon tine record must occur before the Council. Copies of NPO # 6 0 « a1 'r„' a eal ;1, ax.;Planning Commission n Oxc., r, an rip;: and, from the p "_ ` ' ' February 4, 1986, heaving : Pet” ion and letters submitted at the hearing; list S, ,y " of speakers; Staff report; and affidavit of mailing with notice of public hearing, �"� site plan, . 1,� �A �l ya p stn � mailing li. .a��.... 4,i ".6'' ng 1ist�are :attached. { A ear, Ao0 Mom. 04q ... , i■ 1 a.e..r..... .: 1 " r' ,e . . A LTERNATIVES CONSIDERED t ,..1,' ,','" ', y1 rswe.swrs.wawwa,sr i . k� klp'" i' x ' 'I°. `.'v fi� 1. Uphold the Commission Decision. ,: 1' l'. Z« Reverse the Commission Decision. ! EC y; 3. Modify the Commis-lion Decision. 4« Remand the issue back to the Commission for further consideration. . Lu , - s. S x ''';'14::::: *''',.`' Review record and make a decision as appropriate. , t t 1.e. • 0. 4 • u aI p P r / r a ,. .,.,.... , _ - Ar;..f.. ...., , ,,,:......„.,,, 1( I 4-4.-C-C24.4)Cei .f3-/0 1 1 -4?........ier) 44-- c . o, March 10, 1986 ':,,%tf.',.„. 4 ":;';'1,7,f,, .',...q•':4 ($1.,) ° '`■ '...:7:i ' Notice of Appeal k ( — , d -,• ,,i,:,.•:r",,r C ',',,;.:•;;;;.'," ,'. .1i4-0.- -tio-cr(e, ,,.. .,,, ,...' - Planning Commission Case Number: S 1-86 ,,,.:,-,;. f .., ti,,,'•A'''7.:: ,..!-.:'1 :. !,,,•:.,,, .,••: vl.;i...,...•• .,i!. i;'''",• •.,'7:1,'„,...,!,•:••;:.1, 4 • • .1 * ':■4 '!'''',.''+;\' AppealIng P‘arty: Neighborhood P)anning Organization 6 , ,, t , , / , . ‘,7,,,„ .,, ,....,A.,.. klPo (0 oatt4?.s aeb o, PA r+Y 1 A 4ot S PActikr s4etet. ge. iNveveci. sae Is !Darted IA furti V .,:,',%.,■-• ',ie.!. ,„ _ '''.*::4`..:'-r.:' Final Decision Date, March 10, 1986 (in'.30em. Fa,„(, Devslov t. qie. at , 2 5/(367 A, ' /2" .. J.,. v,..e....,.;,...„,,-,, ,e',.,i., , ,,...,:::,z,r., -,-... :.. ' The Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) is appealing Planning 1 ir 4.' Commission Case Number S 1-86, addressed at the February 4, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. The NPO requests case number S 1-86 be ...,:,:. ),t ....,:., ...., remanded back to 4 , citing the following provisions for this action .:ny::,:.:F., ..',,. .);.::,.,.:,. under section 18.32,370 of the development code: -PA See. poLtke 2 .. - -..- ;...,,,,,.i.„-,..,:,-, . ;,,.....„... ... . .„ ..,..-„,„„„....,..„....„„,. ,,,,,..„„.,,,,,,,..„ ,,,.,.. .„,,,..„,„, I. Due to the timing of the Planning Commission public notice, the ..! , : .., ;,,,•`, , ,3".1. landowners Were not able to meet with the NPO and voice their , ..i.,..., concerns. Meetings held after the Planning Commission decision with LI.. . ,,,, ,, ..'.',„ .1;.`e.r.,,,.,, the neighborhood and NPO chairman have resulted in very constructive 4 f, :-.e, involvement regarding development of the proposed land. The NPO did ,.••,.,.. not have the required input to make an informed decision regarding this ,,.. development, thus the request for denial at the Planning Commision `,1.ip.',f',:i.,-'1,41,,•-• •,,.„.•[;:t.,,,,iii%•,;:•,1,4::,:":„.4k; meeting. 'Ag l''''''''''V'*:: : .,1';,..:,. ,1, )('' 2 2, Research conducted by residents of the neighborhood has produced a,:, ,. . i,,,.:.,...,:ii:.,.:,t,ti. ' " evidence of the unique physical character of the land not available at the time of the Planning nlmrnission meeting. The evidence is the ;,,,..4.-:..... ?:':''''; result of a preliminary examination of the proposed site by Mr. Mike Houck, Urban Naturalist or the Audubon Society, Mr. Houck has deter- ...,:, .,,,,,,'•!4,1..,,..,...., 44, mined that several lots are clearly within existing wetlands and should not be built on (see attached letter). 3. Several other twits were inadequately addressed at both the NPO and ;It: i C Planning Commission meetings. The le include: al' 6. 0 a. The character of the proposed ne,ghborhood is ngt in character- _ ,- with adjoining Cooper Creel,' and Kneel:?rid Estates developments _ - ..*•,,,' A more app(Popriate layout of the 'lots to be consistent with the .,,.. shape and charaCter of the lots of the ad i2cent develooro:+i,rtt1/4.-: should be considered, 14 ,•,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,- 1,, ,0 . . . h Transportation issues such as 1 4,..,,‘: --il' .1 ,t) the st3f f report the Iritet-section of 1 V te7.1s.,-; *,•V'', ,,_ , , 1.,. ,..., : . .„,„ .,-,•,....•,1 ,..„.„.,_ •...,•-•_.;-,,.....,-;;..,,.., •,.,,,•••t;.,. 0-. 4•;,,,•• •,,,,i,..,tL..:,p,4. -'1.:;,,,:••'.'.",4:'*:,..,..M,''Oa:.'''',.,,,,,,:o..1.e','..;.';,.."''.`;'''':''.;'...4'"`.i...;,°I'4'1 Vr,„'',.', ''-',:?,''','P..,',;i'l,',.',.;:'1,,:.1'.A+'.4,,,,1,i'l.,1-,',^;,,„,,.'1' '',''''',.:A",11.;','■d; •", ..:':1.t,';'■...V;'t... , .. Notice of Appeal *;,,,;;:;:- 86 4,'-"T• Page Two e ,,, ..,*•i;?' , ,,..,.,,,,,.2.•,-,,,, ).,,-,',! Lane and 92nd Avenue will require a traffic study addressing .ee,..„• ;e,::-. 1 sight distance concerns. The neighborhood agrees with this , sig ance request but is concerned with the lad( of a specific time at v, which the study may be conducted (winter, ',',ow use; summer, ,. . high use; weekday or weekend, Jay or night). Also, no .,,,,,' specific direction is given to the pedestrian aspects of the i study. ,.;..f.e.e:,.., ,,4,,,,.:e.,',... .:', .e 2. The eharacter and volume of tile increased traffic from Tigard eiv,....-.... ,'.:.:,.. e ,;,,-e:' Wel! School and Cook Park on Riverwood Lane through the Picks ,,,.` 'e%e' , Landing, Kneeland Estates and Copper Creek residential areas „..r Y''''.,,,, 4!'',.; ,,f ....,1- was not adequately addressed, -,ve'.,, ,,,, 3. No specific proposal was made to address the problem of •,,,,e'..,,r,• ';':,. . 2:e,...e...;-, private driveways on lots 17 and 18 which may be directly across from Riverwood Lane and intersect with 92nd Avenue, g, ..,.,.....!..• .--,,,I. . . ,. ,, . ..,,.., 4, Parking problems arise when events are held at Cook Park ,,t.,....,:v',1;.° during the summer. Insufficient parking space at the park 'id:::;:':• `••••4A,:'", forces park visitors to park along 92nd Avenue as far away as Tigard High School. This overflow parking would be diverted to Riverwood Lane. .,,. ,., ... ,.., The NPO as a city recognized representative of the neighborhood requests waiver of the appeal fees, •.,, .',V'''.7,','''i'''1. ' i, J.i. "1 k*"',''','I:'',1::;''.i..''' • Respectfully submitted, .-. :., '"'-' ,ietie,&,. '1 '6'1 irk" _ 4 '66 . Phil Pasteris, Chairman .z . . NPO $4 6 - - _ - :, ...I . — . - • ..; tn .• _ . , 4 — . - L '2.1, -. cc9 -* • '.•': ChNNA ' "G\V C(( tbM PP0 6 citAJ .... , V avieltv\ MtsSPA ex • • 14iovka-137,9•-• \v1(:.4---- ,,,, '''',1_ ,e•e.,e,e,:e.,.., Yle(5_, ''.'':`,.:".4 t;•:::,‘-' '',' , 1, •.. '',;:i'•'.*'''''...4'''',.',' 1 *1..,.;.1,•";*:r'''..t.''''.1 ::4;‘,i't..::::'.*:;"4.■:*.:1'■ '1';*"V.':',.,:;','.■ .' 4.V.P •.0 ,,,-.1......,,..`;,..4 -7, '..,01,.,:-..::,“' :, ,.,,,,.1,,1"_ ,.., ,' ...o, ,r?....a•-;,.',' ,, i;,,,,,a''' t,,,■,,, .,-. .. • 4 r,. - -----•---.----.-.. .,. -,...ems.-�...�...,..�...�_.�.._ i r' .' ,il rid, 1 4 •r(. S P .;H•'i u• l Ni4. y bv'1'$« 1 °�'�al.'ft''11 +�ao A Branch C11 0I ,Vntio Yta1 Audubon Society ', r t rats s'" .; PHONE 292-6855 • 5 t 5 7 NORTHWEST CORNELL ROAD r ;;tt :, PORTI t�D, OREGON 972 i :x ",i, ,,, ,•->,. March 3, 1986 , j,. f'''r "-:.. City of Tigard 1r � Planning Department a M .. ,; P. O. Box 23397 �r 0 t:, Tigard, Oregon 47223 y 1 kf„ ry , Re•Kneeland Estates Number 3 '',./..„, 1 I.dis . • i. ;V) Y Il I visited the site recently at the request of a local landowner 1y' h,l{f ��t.-I, '�•y k r t MA l a J�i and wanted to let you know I have some specific concerns about 1 y ° + i the p;Iace sent of lots in .obvious wetlands. 1 1! � Y Lots: 3, 2, 1, 17 3n 1. are all clearly within existing wetlands r,t r i t,c4 fl and should not be built on it If is the developer dogs go ahead .with ,,, �' .. plans to develop these lots it is my opinion that 404 permit ',� ;it Nm would be regloired and you should notify the applicant that this '' w w � d IWn 1 j... "r,; �; '? is the case. , y;' As I have no additi.onalinforamation at this time I will await more ,t. , information from you about the status of this project. L, ,,,t a 1 r W t. ,% 14' ` S�:noere�.y, ,,1 d x"r 1 .,*, Mike Houck ' f w d Conservancy��„1•.'�� cc Jack Broome, Wetlands CL'�n�er�Ic�%'t�C �`` ., �, ,c Gelt,e Herb, ODFW ci4 ' �, r Brian Liyhtcap, U. S Army Corps A Joe Pesek, DDFW ' J' alb, 0 - 1 r FI � � A Y rA j � n , _ 1 _ __`* I", -_.. __ thsi, .ti;tuwi 4.`tll ilk ,J" +h4 ' 1 „'.'95 . r 1 p,r.k i ,..'� ■: e p4 L i:ali t.'t,I 1 01r, n4 y d".. i'' A 'b I ' F.,li:y"71 %1 ? 7 ,a l 1.,,,,', I'.,.�'J,.. ''t, .) .„ii, t,., .):,!.r{F'11, I ,.'. "..--,,,,4,,,'t. r ..*,. .l •.,�{. r .- -'- ---- i'��{I 3 1 1 + 4 ,'''.'1:‘,.,.„:'c,,.4 - h II 1 lc):4 .1,,,t:.;:;,:','. k. .I 4 ,•N` r w�. r'�. ;`,,d,;.)4;.,,,- . ,ig . .1 ii.$ A .,r, i-.., ,{Axx .,. r ey‘ir ;',P,:,.'1 1 Jl ;�- r 1 . . a 151tre4-;r5w x .c 11 0 I, tom/ � t I r ,.., ..,,,.i.e..,..,,,,,,, f r i1 al 1 0 1 A di on;',7,..,.:',.:4:,. alit 1460 1 . 'avi 3 C f I/ I 6:Erz„1,..ttni ' 'v , .t, ° ` .. i 0I awi T 0 r rh,� 0 ,,......,-..„:„, . 1 Ato . 7 1 wa .,.., , d. ,„ .. .� 1 yY d { ide ;��J.4 ,,,-.,.,,,, ...,„..,.. .,..„,, Iv' :,'o nioie _117'ti 0 . 777 -- *re ' egg,'" . / . e, be-0 , ,N 1 ., , i yyAwi`f T F �` 1 �W r� gip(/jj��`' ` qn ter. ., A, . ..., . 4 f PL��' LOL In lY r it , 4 • ,,,,,,,,:,,,,, , r, .".:';'.):,:„..;',..,,,,,:, . :. ,j _JO i 0 r ei a i ...,,.,,.,. if. ..,. ., , _. , ie Ord 0 , - ..- .., ail!` tr ' LII'4 • • . ilagv. 1 i , ,,,:7,4,,::::,:,:;,),, r.:„.. :,...:,,,,:..., d ,::4 Yu,+at), 4 T�1,, . , _ , .... i, oi,,,,,* (1p/1 e■■ { ibtt'J 14.1 0?Lusa e 0' SI *.'''''' D 1'f 4 l • i � 1I �, ,7 1 ul{•+ 4 N- r. , it 1 ya`t lY y.. rf' )\If" .■'''',.g:il:'''",'''':''',,:“,! . 3 onct -,r' Rego&X � ,{ ti�T�,��pp I v ,... {At.:, ,!, ,,k� �1r�1 ��:!,':• ! VeLOPI)-r/trrt 4-�J Y, G t *� rya. 44, E M5 i'mg Ire(k, it r a#,ni , . eciot....,..i...,.„,,,,,.....,,4-.,..,,,, L , ,i,„..,.,, IA, Y, tsj,. ,. -.4 ,,,,, 0 ,, ,AP 9( � a I J � i Y�t '�1f✓ �-) ----,i () /✓�,r.�l�/t4��Y�v �1' / �.� Yt r•- :44,ori•, ,. ! _. � lf/kf / r1 , �/ `. l.'`` fir•' i� I• /"J ��...�x �y l 120 1 � I Y ° f �l 1�'V ) j t l:'L i' f .J -' l 1. i 4l I Ia �',n/r .( 1 �L . sr i\ r,'r` W 4 1 ' ' '' . { S r . +Y • .,✓x 0 0 i.,i,e.,,,, ).1.),,,.1",.._ 11.,A_)Li ,4,...,1 ._ le.c.,.. ../.(c,S-. S C.,,,,,I ti,_:•),.-,..) /...t•L. t..* - .,' -s kt . ./ . L . 7 I . , ., 3 p?. ,k«y ,' x••)44, l -''„1i {..�.' LL 4., / w.fLt. ,, , l l`' , tr 1.L1/4,t 4 •r •'••; y'�U Y'�4y L �!Y mil' ✓ v '•♦ - C • y J� . { J M . _..... __.._ .... ,..�..�,,. .,. . -.i. .,..!,,..• •!s a .. , A .: .4., {�_ _ u ,. al.r__u � W_ y _Lt. •I,•i..+R fi.n1.1tl1 .1a.A_{,a . 1 ��4M':L,a ,q..'.•i.- , t 1.,,'M I Nk��l x : b.x.w,", v 4= 4a.i ,i , ,G a 1".t+ { 'r y{1 b,.l W�a��!a r�� ?� �w��nk:.�'�E;'M` �1.;y1ti� A+� n,.14 ,L ,rya L� „7,7,-,""2^'ft ,,,it,'' -"` 'Jo; •A' ; •3.1 t.7 ry, ,_,7, ,^—•*; ^• ••• I 1 0 4 i 1 4:,...C4P-N'/"';•,fretct/l'-:-.)" rir , 7S .11 r'n1.) .-Y7 Cs\ 9 02$ , • 't—oza) 07C ,Yde #-Y-4-AV.) elr C:1411"9"/ ( 9t2 (-7'W fs.07 c.,t47,11;iroiy 0L.Lb gnsi, c„ (.;Ac‘,6 OPTZ7(195 -S'SN •ys oa.„sb )), c.i, (77:r e56 "'■ eAr7 , . 1.17 ..-.)-)1.2.rivyr-y (Y) 0.41--c: y)-2k-11,')Alry o NINO/741'Y nCt)1/4/) cs yr 7. / /Qv .)„,„-17 r to 19.4/ 111,1,0)( A:0119 /72777:1 C(/ 7/7 I tl r nniiP AAA , 1"c° "‘,, ..1•112L • .':,,':. Y t,Lf- w ,t J n1 ply :f,,b?o, r tl -' '''',21.4.,1, e/ ,,.,, ` ` . CITY OF TI.GARD 1, I j j C� 1: ♦P : Washington County, Oregon u' R1,<4 t ax: .,.,4 t,. , t, NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMISSION �,.�• (:.:,..;:',:'' '' :,�11 ' 1.. Concerning Case Number(s): S 1-86 86 tit ' ° 4,. ',. r 2. name of Omer s Lincoln Savings & Loan r`° .s ,M ;°- w I4 3. Name of Applicant Same + , ''.r,; 10250 SW Greenbu Rd. City Portland State Oki Zip 97223 r alb p- tli . 4 ,a t r Y {''*1� l, 4s Location of Property• , } • ,6 I ,y,>+ 4 4 Address West of 92nd Ave. between Kneeland Estates II and Conk Park ' • ° Tax Map and Lot No(s)• (2S1 I4A lot 900) „,, j ':,"'",":-.,,,t';,',.;,. ,. �.wrr.+rw..r�. 01:1: Zi 5. Nature of Application: Request to divide 8.68 acres into 18 lots with minimUm .' . PP q r,,, ,• °, size of 7,500 sq. ft. y', ° �,d ' , °" 6. Action Apx�coval as tegv�ested ;�4 f . ie.._. Approval with conditions nip; 4"', di ` .' Denial ,,,,, ' ,u1,. 1 Notice was "" P I , posted y , �i,'^� ' ' ;� 7. Norma mailed to: published in the ner�� a er osted at City Hall and ,` ; ,,•4,,,iS`-, ,' XX The applicant & owners u�`,4!.": ` _` XX Owners. of record within the required distance .�wk � t yt��.� rir..—. . <,31iwi - X�ysX*p, The affected Neighborhood ?1antairdg Organization ` i=� j pct"3 Y � XX Affected governmental agencies , .,4r ,:• r �, x> . 8. Final Decision: °1y, r r4 „ R 1,t rr ` t,y ,'' " �3`;% TilE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON March 10, 1986 UNLESS APPEAL IS FILED. �' „, d c .,, The adopted findings p ngs of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be • `t, —et. obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, ,5^ 16.t i, '''.'1' 1� � P.O b Box 23397,�Tigard, Oregon 97223.co 91 A, �l. .' ` ' Any ... -� _ j y party -to the decision may ppea. this decision In accordance with ,',” 1, 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a Written appeal. may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent , The deadline for filing -of an :sppeal is March !0, 1986 4:30 PO . it �' , 10. questions If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard 1,4 'Mta ": ',�° Planning Department, 639.4171 t' , „ , (0257p) ". 4. ,, w a tt� r; 1 M' tit 1 jM1 `I: 1 r . i0; h 1: -__ -_-. v_,,.t .:t r_,,,.y . r•d-::.,.! 1 �y„ * .,� 5°.": t'F!•i M1Wct 4 4 r,.�'# t° {•1'ro r ,l�iliir !� r. .:: r {�,+ y,.�.4.� w'� m b��7 1. � �, . t ,J� 1°«1 C'0. 4.1. W) �{y –- � ,t ,?'4��s�,X 1� wp4,� �'aY �� _+"i�,Ai�i�_t v+�1L1��.. I 1° h � '�w ,.1 {L ",;aP. .4 t4,.. til• L ,"Fp '�':. { ,� yMt , �.ti,A lei fit.+„-,4:V...,:I . CITY OF T!CARD PLANNING COMMISSION , �"'rt , FINAL ORDER NO. 06 PC ,-.., ¶T,-: 't '` i ` A FIia'iAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, WHICH APPROVES AN ::; .t t `� e c APPLI(A TION FOR A SUBDIVISION (S 1-06) REQUESTED BY LINCOLN SAVINGS AND ee �'r 'e- , LOA J �� The Tigard Planning Commission x '' g l ing Commi on reviewed the above application at a public , ., rl hearing on February 4, 1906. The Commission based !ts decision c the fact e, e . findings, and conclusions noted below; w,� r4,Y+ ., A. FACTS 1. General Information w ,,mss.".1-;',.'y 2 i. j y ,rv ' ,'” CASE: Subdivision S 1-86 w 'it It x:. N r i rT �� 'F A�;. REQUEST': To divide 0.60 acres into 18 lots with a minimum size of 7,500 j.` .r square feet :I 5..,,'fw al.., . 0' , ::? COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION; Low Density Residential + "G-+",YI ZONING DESIGNATION: R-45 Residential, 4.5 units/acre)! t: h '\"1 t "' w APPLICANT Lincoln Savings and Loan OWNER: SAME «x a _ ;e 10250 SW Greenburg Road ``�.; i;, Portland, OR 97223 {'hf x r u,ri,{ a * LOCATION: West of 92nd Avenue between Kneeland Estates No II and Cook Park tom, y ROEy�A {�. J c it wP r '� Preliminar y pl:,t approval at granted x n 9®1 (S 11-00/CPR 12-01) for 2" 4=' , "attached and 5 detached sa le family res den gal lots. The final p lat. µ .,^ -"_` was never recorded and the approval has expired, :1 + t e }: ti � n y ' 3 i c ,rai ty Tbf ormat ion ti Jr � ` ', Kneeland Estates No. 2 lies to the north and Tigard High School is t, northeast on the opposite side of 9 .� Pp to ea this area, Creek 92nd Avenue, The R�-�4 5 zone a 1 s h The Copper C eek development which i k zoned R-7 (PD) k 4 (Residential, 7 units/acre, planned development) lies immediately west and Cook Park abuts the southern boundary of the property, ' 4. Site Information l2 The property is presently undeveloped, The terrain slopes -downward from r (9 north to south with grades of up to 30% in the nor-thern portion of ih site, The southern half of the property i s within the 100 year rloo plain. • • r i ni FINAL 0RDR NO 86--02PC - PAGE 1 a *,.',N. 4. .. ,.1""., ,1.. .4.. ,.. � ..,: .r.:,tq ,$w.-,..u.., T. ,.. ±..s,a.... .., �.,w. ...q .. +.i' Nr w' l''.'''''''' �r .,��rR... I:.4iY , M . i�. 1�.�' .,,.. ... 4 ,'�;-. +"A',„r�:' �" >a 't �I'ft'%,.;.,.! a4..a ','-'1 H t ' , , 11 d rs�l. t -_ �-' Z.:__. '�uh,.9P�:r k� N:;_F t.1.� __ +��"p ,.�,. Ip 1 r 7 �� :�w ,y � ,,, i 1 '� , ,....'s ;''' r•.."' n,:. 1. I.', ,''',,' .t je ,. 1,-,t, 4 ', 7,:.''.■'...!':;,' 4,..' ■'k''',...-r''''1'''' , The anplicant proposes to divide the property into 18 single family eeTnness ,i, residential lots, all with a minimum size of 7,500 square feet. e .7,11/4..".D'....'":k r ' Riverwood Lane will be extended from its terminus at Copper Creek to . .s. (, \ 1/4 92nd Avenue. In addition to Riverwood Lane, four lots will have se. .,... frontage on the 93rd Avenue cul-de-sac in Kneeland Estates No. IX .. -.- , -.....,, -in,7 ,, Although this proposal represents a reduction in the number of lots from ;'..','''. "',. ,,,= 27 to 19, the subdivision layout and street alignment are vary similar 11,c4.rle, sje. e., . to the proposal that was approved in 1991. e ,s. 4,s ,,'-...' ',,,11.'.' Je4s-ie. ...,, s e. s..s. 5. E.REIDLATIALAE2...c.2_110Dlts .:• ,,"`,s,e,e,, st, r.- ; ,--- The Engineering Divisiom has the following comments: The Lots 17 and 19 on the east side of 92nd Avenue will preclude the ea •,,;,-,r,, extension of Riverwood Lane to the east. The applicant should be "':7•See'e. able to show that other reasonable alternatives exist for - , s e '...e-ne."...ss*s. 4,,, e.es,71 're, providing access to the property to the east. b. The issue of stormwater runoff presents several problems which 0■•I • ,..':.'.","..'l'' must be clarified. Stormwater through "Tract A" from the achool a ei. eeee e property and 92nd Avenue needs to be addressed along with the ,-.44 , s e ,,„',-; e4 gully through Lots 10, 11, and 12 and the drainage over Lot 9 in .e r ,4- the event of a catch basin failure on the 93rd Avenue cul-de-sac. nif!sS eet . , c. A private pond is located above Lot 12. Liability for any flooding caused by the pond and the right of this owner to release . water onto Lot 12 is unknown. k/ * . 0'A d Slope easements along Riverwood Lane will be necessary. ... .. . , . ... , , , e,,,,,:'S'''''''':,:' e If Rivess000d Lane does not connect with the domp7mted portion in. , . .,-snfi Copper Creek, a temporary turn around will be necessary ..X t 67- f Lots 7 and 8 have double frontage and access should be limited to - i,r,' ..,1' . ste ,e one street, The access for Lot 16 shall be limited to Riverwood seeeeees . , s Lane es.•-es,'t ', irr, 0, g, A traffic report is needed indicating what measuaes should be taken to mitigate the site distance limitations at the proposed 4.- a Riverwood Lane/92nd Avenue intersection. a- 0 h, The applicant must provide stormwater runoff report addressing t= proposed on and off site stormwater and erosion control during and OD - after construction. This report must address the impact of h: , upstream drainage facilities and the mitigation of adverse k ' '.49 -... .... stormwater impacts upon C!ty Park and greenway areas, ...I , - The /00 yea ' flood - plain should be dedicated- 'so the city as all ' greenway. - .... ,. ,A A Sensitive Lands Permit will be hecessary for any construction or If. .1 1 grading within the flood plain, drainageways, or slopes over 25%, , s`. . - , k Any reductiea in the width of the City's standard street section -, will require the aPproval of of variance. FINAL ORDER NO 86--O2PC - PAGE 2 e'e ■• ',-.„ „". '44. ,,,,,t.„ " ,,.., • 41.,.'t Ch,,.. « . .,4, —4.. , -,''■ ,,, ,,. , ,,■,;:,:, II•■■ ,, r'1'4: ',",,I.,,1,. ., '..'4.,',„ 1 ,. .4. 4'' i'. ••••,:',,,.."Y 4!e,'1",,L,%.7"A\,. '`,?::'i.,1',,,:, "':.,,,., .., ''. ' ''''':f,"... ':.;,''..!.' ' ' ■: 'le '..1'..,* , lekee. 'A4'`'''.. 0..:. ..4 ''''''4 7''Y ' * ,i 'ele'',.'''f.l''''.1 1 ? ''''15''' ".:.''''',1'. '14' '' '' ''', '.1' The Building Inspection Division notes that the slopes on many of the : ',%. if. lots are steep and that development and meeting setbacks standards may ,-:.:::,, ( ' \ be difficult. ., ,.. .:, ,,- ,, ,..1-."1'',., :,:','..t,,', The Tigard School District and NPO #6 have no objection. , .,. ,,. ii, '*-,...,. 4 /4 ,--,,'; r. No other comments have been received. 8. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ..4 .; ,,.. '.e The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan ,.1 ';',1,'•' :, ',? „',.''' policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3 and 2. . .c. i',‘.!.. ',....' te ' community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.160, and 18.164. Since re le e':''''',e, the Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, the Statewide Planning , 1''''" Goals and Guidelines no loner need to he addressed. .., 4 ..; The Planning Commission concludes that the proposal with minor ., modifications is consistent with the relevant portions of the ... , .i.,...,..i.,, „,,,..,-..... Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: et. .ee, j';,', ,...y..;..),,, ee y-e'e a. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning te ee --e-- e Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's '..'.1 e•,' -..„`ee .1.* proposal. .. . ,..,., '''' b. Policy 3.1.1 will be satisfied provided that any portions of the e ''', -,- Lots which exceed 25% slope are not graded or filled without a , e.eee,le Sensitive Lands Permit. , ... ".",. C. . . , Policy 3.2,1 will be sattsfied because levelopment within uhe 100 ..,,,.e.:'.,,e';', year flood plain will be avoided. If Any of the proposed street ' '.:. 1 4 - e . eee does encroach upon the flood plain, a Sensitive Lands Permit will e:,-7.. -..! be required. .4 . .. - .'7'''',',.,,',.P:” • d Policy 7.1.2 can be met when additional information, noted in the ,. ,„ , Engineering Division comments, is submitted and appropriate , mitigation measures taken, ! eeel e e Policy 7,3. 1 and 7.4,4 are satisfied because adequate water and , - . ....., sewer facilities are available to the development. The applicant also indicates that these facilities will be provided within the subdivision as required by the City standards. `. Policy Ii.1,1 will be met once the termination of Riverwood Lane at ,., 92nd Avenue is justified or provisions for future extension to the • t: oast are made. . . - _ , — -g. Policy 8. 1,3 will be satisfied when the conditions of approval relating to street improvements are completed. - ft, - , The Planning Commission has determined that the proposal is consistent .), with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon 4 ■ i -,* the findings noted below: _ '' - - _ 4‘•'4,41,,, 41, *,,',. ,•'7,''''l','.*.''''•.'• l''''' ,,• ...*1 ■ FINAL ORDER NO 86 tc.s2PC - PAGE 3 ' ,.., . ..,:, ,,,,i ... . ,..,-....,, -,,-,,,e..-,xt1,•'''.!'r,- ,,..,.."1,,,,',..,,,% , . _..), -,`,,,t'' ''''',...--;:lf.‘t.).: .. . ,. . . . ..„ , ,.. ..- 411 ' 41) ,,, J a. Chapter 18,50 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets 1 :• r , all of the requirements of the R-4.5 zoile. , ...,.. , , i b. Chapter 18. 160 of the Code i$ satisfied because the proposal meets r. .. - .... t ..., the requirements set forth for the submission and approval of a . , . preliminary plat. .... ,.. . . C. Chapter 18.164 of the Code will be satisfied during the approval - ... a• process for the final plat. , ' - .":, '• C. DECISION . .... . . , -. •. Based upon the findings, and conclusions above, the Planning Commission - :• approves of S 1 ;-86 subject to the following conditions: . r i i. , , 1. 1 . UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO .1. , RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT, , .. . .-,..., . ..-. 2. Standard half-street and full street improvements including , - . . .. . . .. sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage IP. . ; and utilities (delete inapplicable items) shunt be installed along ..... ...e - . .. the SW 92nd Avenue frontage. Said improvements along SW 92nd • 4 , . Avenue shall be built to (60' R/W, 36' Pmt.) City standards : . . . . . including an 8 ft walk on the west side and conform to the ... ge ...,,t, alignment of existing improvements. (* note the attached section . . . • which was approved via Kneeland Estates subdivision development). ' ...- . ., .. . 3. Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction -- - . plans including a site grading plan and cross sections and one (1) ,. itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by at Registered , , fl'..... ,.. Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public . improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. b .. .... 4. Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profile details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans, - .. S. Slope easements along SW River-wood Lane shall be provided to the public. Documentation shall be on City forms or on the plat and t. approved by the Engineering Section, 6, The applicant shall provide at stormwater runoff report addressing Mt . proposed onsite and offsite atormwater control and soil erosion 00 control (during and after construction); said report shall also - address tFo impact of upstream drainage facilities on the site and ; . ' .A the mitig. Lion of stormwater damage to the downslope City park & - bpen space lands, 9. - - - - . - 7. Construction of proposed pUblic improvements shall not commence : Until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public , .. improvement plans, The Sections will reqUire posting of a 100% Performance bond, the payment of a parmit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee, Also, the execution of at . , .,' . construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or ae, - .7 - - .concurrently with the issUance- Of . apprnved *pUbl_ic iMproVempnt . , ..,_ plans: SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INPOMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES, BONDING AND AGREEMENTS. ,• .„, - ,, rINAL ORDER NO 86-02PC , PAGE 4 . . . - r ,,, 8 411 *. 8. SW Riverwood Larne will conne&r with Riverwood Lane in the " development to the west (Copper Creek). •;Y a. 9. Additional right-of--way shah be l dicated to the Public along the '�. SW 92nd Avenue frontage to increase the rkght-of--way to 30 feet • from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be tied to the existing right-of-way c enterlin® a:� established by Washington County. The dedication document shall be on City forms ... and approved by the Engineering Section. DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED. • 10, Double frontage lots, namely 1 7 and 8, shall both be restricted to only one access each on the same public y+, y puw.�c roadw4 ,•. 11. Lot #16 shall only have direct access onto SW Riverwood Lane. Y 12. The applicant shall provide a traffic report indicating measures to be applied to mitigate sight distance concerns, at the , intersection of Riverwood Lane and 92nd Avenue, to the Engineering .*� Section. The Riverwood Lane easterly acct shall be addressed in , conjunction with this study and Lots 17 and 18 shall be platted f and Tract "A'° shall be dedicated to the City once the traffic "' study has been reviewed and approved by the Engineering Division. 13. The applicant shall dedicate lands within the 100 year. floodplain .:: and the property south of the road not platted into Lots 1,2, and' 3 for greenway purposes :'..,'. ( 14. Street Centerline. Monumentation 0. a. In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2), the a , centerlines of all street and roadway rights-of--way . hall be °" monumented before the City shall accept a street improvement. u b. All centerline monuments shall be placed in a r es4nument box .' conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument "! boxes shall be set at design finish grade of s:,id street or ., roadway. . C. The following centerline monuments shall be set; 1) All centerline-centerline intersections. Intersections created with "collector" or of tier existing_ streets, shall be set when the centerline alignment of said "collector" or other street has been established by or for the City: . _ 2) Center of all cui -sacs; _ R r. FINAL ORDER NO. 86-02PC PAGt 5: A 0 Ito 3) Curve points, points of intersection (p,I. ) when their pos-tion falls inside the limits of the pavement P ( otherwi3e beginning and ending points (B.C. and E.G. ). 4) All sanitary and storm location shall be placed in positions that do not interfere with centerline monumentat ioo ,; 15. A Sensitive Lands Permit shall be required for any encroachment , , into the 100 year floodplain or construction in drainageways or ' slopes over 25%. 16. Lot 12 she,11 be subject to the setback and height requirements for �. flag lots contained in Sections 18.96.090 and 18.98 of the Code, . t '2.- 17. A tree cutting permit shall be obtained from the City prior to /.- removing any trees over 6 inches in diameter. '•. 18, After review and approval by the Planning Director and City Engineer, the Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington County, 19. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. 4, r : , It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this order, :. fi PASSED: This day of 1996, by, the Planning t Commission of the City of Tigard: `; A O ,,,,,?, a , . , A ry Donald Moon, President Tigard Planning Commission -,, , ; (kSL bsB7) ■ Fii\JAt., ORDER O. 86--©2PC - PAGE . . •,.. ., s A 410; 411 .,,.. • i TRANSCRIPT e ... +S. s TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION - February 4, 1986 „ . . ■ . ITEM 5. 1 - LINCOLN SAVING & LOAN (S 1-86) :- .. .. .... COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: President Moen; Commissioner Butler, Peterson, ..., Bergmann, Newman, and Leverett. ..,.., SUBDIVISION S 1-86 LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN/KNEELAND ESTATES III NPO # 6 e. . „ . Request to subdivide a 8.68 acre parcel into 18 lots, with a minimum lot size of 7,500 sq. ft. , on property zoned R-4.5 (Residential 4.5 units/acre) Located: Between Kneeland Estates and Cook Park, west o ' , .. .. . Tigard High School (251 14A, lot 900). - ,h ..- . ..e ,e . President Moen, (Read procedures into the record) "With that we move onto -- , ' 0:0. . item 5.1, staff do we have a report. ,. . . ..' Senior Planner Newton, "Item 5.1 is a proposal for a subdivision and the proposal is located to the west of SW 92nd just north of Cook Park. There's . , 8.68 acres involved and the applicant's proposing to divide that into 18 lots, - , consisting of approximately 7500 sq. ft. each. A little history on this application. A preliminary plat approval was granted in 1981, however that ., e. plat was never recorded, and the approval has expired. Uh, basically the applicant' s proposa7,s meets most of applicable planning conditions and zoning . J code requirements, if certain conditions are attached to the approval. We got . .. some problems with steep slopes, which Lould require a sensitive lands permit, e , ' particular it the north section of the lot and perhaps, or the property, and ".. 4:3' perhaps in this area here. Uh, any drainageway areas would also require a sensitive lands permits before development could occur. Riverwood Lane is . -. ' .: . V. . another concern and Riverwood Lane ends here and staff and applicant would . propose that Riverwood Lane be connected in this area You'll notice in your . . ., e,,, steir report, condition number 8 and 9 on page 5, relate to Riverwood Land. ..„ - . . This conditions, These conditions were originally proposed then staff was a 1..•,,-'''' , =., little unclear as to where this property line waS. However, the surveyor has , determined that property lines are indeed adjacent and Riverwood Lane can be .- etoe connected. So I would suggest that the Planning Commissioner make that a .. , ... condition and not leave the option available to the applicant in conditions 8 and 9. Several, Tax Lots, or Lot 7 and 8 have a double frontage here on 93rd Ave, and on Riverwood Lane, The applicant will need to make choice as to .. om pe which Street these lots will be oriented to and also take into consideration, ' 0) I believe there are some special setbacks involved, and we got to. . . , . , . . and we' ll hwie to make sure that they conform to those. Lot number 16 shall access onto Riverwood Lane, that's another important condition. All land in the 100 year flood plain will need to be dedicated and the Engineering CD Department is a little bit concerned about this. access of Oiverwood Lane onto uj ....J 92nd, how that connection is made and we would like to see some more traffic information on how vision and access impacts might be mitigated, So staff . . recommends approval with the conditions as listed ih the staff report with the modifications to 8 and 0, and also we need to be a little bit concerned about some of the trees ih the area and obtain a tree cutting permit, because with the steep slopes in the area, we could have some problem with erosion if we , „ . . .,-.I. .. are not careful in the romovalof those trees," .. TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND S 1-86 Page 1 . ' I . . • *•,P 411 4 A 410 , (Sevral people talking) 4,..., Commissioner Butler, In the Engineering Division page, in regards to 16, 17, and 18, could you address that The lots . . . . . . . . - extension of Riverwood , Lane. ?. Senior Planner Newton, "Well, yeah, Engineering Department did 'wring up a . e concern about the extension of Riverwood Lane, from 92nd into this area. The • Transportation Plan adopted by the City Councils shows Riverwood Lane connecting from 108th to 92nd. That connection is shown and that is something .. that the Commission should be aware of, that we don't really want to preclude .1.: that option. However, from 92nd Ave. east is not, that connections is not e shown on the plan, We ought to look at passible connections to serve that . •• area. The Engineering Departments primary concern stems from the fact that .,; they don't want to see any kind of a offset to Riverwood Lane that would make a T intersection and cause some conflicts there, However, if the connection were made to the north, a couple hundred feet or 300 feet north, that wouldn't - ev be as big of a concern. There concerned about a close offset here, . . . , . . . . and also serving the area So you might want to consider a condition that would ask that the applicant to come up with some sort of circulation plan to serve that area to the east. President Moen, "Would that „ . . . '''.. Senior Planner Newton, "There's some large lots, its pretty large lot homesites, it not , President Moen, "Okay, thank you staff. Can we have the applicant's presentation please" e.. a 4. ••■ . •:,,,. "Mr, Chairman, members of the Commission, my name is Norman Harker, HARKE R, I'm with Alpha Engineering, representing the owner, Lincoln Savings. I e ' would' like to, I guess Liz has given you background on this project pretty ea, well. The prior approval was, uh, completed by our firm and we did go through - ":. the engineering plans and went through the plat, almost to the state of construction and at that time, 81, the bottom of the market fell out and the .., ... ? project was not completed, The bank then ended up with the property through a Sheriff's sale, A couple of items that I would like to clarky, uh, in ..„ talking to Randy this afternoon, with the Engineering Department, He agreed that hat connection to north, towards the east would bl acceptable, uh, there isn't, if you look right at . . , . . , its not shown on your map but at the very top of tract "A", going to be south bounded b the Tigard High School, 16 foot - . right-of-way, that serves that parcel back in And, uh, what I discussed with , . Randy was the idea of just giving tract HA" ,uh, Which on your map I don't ..:. * think is very well defined. Should be a line, right here, 4,..., Moen, "On the 160 ft ‘ ," _ - •! _ _ t Harker, "So that gives a couple, 500 , (cough). . . area in there to play with, its nol really useable for the applicant and they are willing to deed that to the City, dedicate that to the City, , , . , , , (coughing). . , . , have quite an . : area in there to determine where the access should be And We would also . . . and the offset is still 5800 Feet, we have no problem with that The (pause) gum on the- floor klaughter) . . . The neighborhood .association, N . TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND 8 1-86 Page 2 •. . , .., .. „ ' ` .` • ` .`, ... . ' . . . .... ." - : ,' .. ...'"'IMMEIEEigitUMMIWMIVMWMMMnwmrammm........- . ' someone talking in bac ground, can't hear . , . Okay . „ . . - „ . . Uh, I wait ..,•:,-.. . .• to 'address there comments later then. Basically we agree with the staff . ..- .-' , rep6rt, we rt, even reviewed it and talk with the staff about the report. What we ,...- • 4 . . would like to do is, 5 of the conditions, we would like to make sure that we ,, ... . , clarify now. I was talking to Liz, cause apparently one of the big problems after we get approval and go back in for the nitty gritty, is making sure that k . • - we are in accordance with what we understand, and what the Commission .. .. understands. Item number one regarding the conditions prior to final . .... .• : ■"m. • aPPrOVal. It's our understanding that we can assure the property, which is . . - _ guaranteed through a bond, for constructions of the streets and so forth to be . .,-;- . ' built prior to filing. There is no problem with that? Okay, just want to ....- : ,•: make sure that we don't have to build all the streets and the sewer lines before we can plat. comment from someone not transcribable. . . . - On , ,-, item two, street improvements along 92nd Ave, frontage. I would like to add ,... . - ..,. ,' shall be installed along the SW 92nd Ave. frontage, like to add "lot frontage, . . to clarify that that is the frontage in front of the lots. - . . . . . ." '- ' ' -" Senior Planner Newton, "It would be in front of all of th,F, property, it may not be lots, . „ . . . . . . , clarify by the engineer condition, but my .- understanding is that he'd be responsible for these, • along open space, we can double check that," . - .,. . _ . , . . -.., ...-:':.... .4. Harker, "What about tract "A"? In otherwords we would have, ,. ..,. , - - • •....... Newton, "Anything, its my understanding that anything, that are ultimately, . .. or originally was part of property is what you would be responsible for." ,. . Harker, "Even though we .....:.::::- .. .0 ,... ,..• Newton, "Thats standard Butler, "Well if it was a street, it wouldn't make much sense to put a ., sidewalk on it If its suppose to be a terminus for a street. ,',,:. ...,... .L ' Newton, "He can discuss the improvements with :,. Moen, "That something he would work out with the City, normally he would be 4: responsible for all his property, - ....: i .. (several people talking) "Moen, "Okay, go ahead," ° g.... - Harker, _ "Xs there a mechanism for a waiver or a remonstrance in the City. ' 11..... i Uh, for a LID. ..., .....t , .. .. Newton, Well were not using them as much now , e . , . . 1 just, uh, I think 4' 1 0 , the conditions should be written the way it typically is and if you want to _ . . .J appeal that you can," _ . . . _ Harker, "Thats fair, , . . . . , , okay, Item eleven, regarding the two lots that . • have double frontage, would like to allow the builder the option of deciding r. which way to face his home. Uh, suppose we could put a condition on the plat that would specify that there would be only one frontage on those two lots," 1 •4. ' ' ?' - ._, . . ■k. + . . , , ,: ... , • ''. TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS 'a LOAM) S 1-86 Page 3 ... . . ,'' "- .• if : . - , • A A . 411 . , , ,..,„. Newton, "Well, we have a problem with address, which is why we would like to .... " ,.. see thrn . „ We don't want to have onu oriented to one street and one , , oriellted to the other. . . . . . . . . sel. ious problems . . - . . when we assign . • - , addresses before- , . . „ . so thats the concern. . . ... Moen, "All there asking is, Staff wants you to take either 7 and 8 and face . , . them one way or take 7 and 8 and face them the other way." .., , ..- f Harker, "What woulei happen if the builder wanted to come in and face his house the other way, g - 0,:. •-• et: - . „.. . Newton, YOU would have to do an address change and you would have to notify a" the utilities and everything." -:-. - - - Harker, "That's not a big problem." ,.. •:- , Newton, "Well, yes it is a problem, its real time consuming, it would hold up - there permit process, ' Its not impossible, its not recommended," Moen, "Do you as a developer have a preference?" 4' - • .• - . ..r.' '‘...' t. Harker, "No, not as a developer, we wouldn't. It would be the person who's :. building the house would be the one." Uh, number fourteen regarding the 100 , ' year flood plain. 1 have no prolem dedicating the majority of the flood - . ... plain, we do have three lots that, in order to square the lots up somewhat we . . encroached a few feet into the flood plain. We would like to clarify that as e- -. --. . saying that the applicant proposes co dedicate the 100 year flood plain for greenway purposes, except those arees noted one the preliminary plan. , - •, , , .. . ' ..e. 1.•1. ,., . Newton, "We've done that in the past and uh, Picks Landing, there is some . , ., , • . e lots that have a portion of there back yard is in the flood plain." . - "Harker, "Basally thats it, we, the other items Liz has covered and we agree with standard subdivision assurances the public works projects and so . .. . .,,,.„ . , ' forth".. Any questions - '7 Moen, "Any questions?" "Okay, fine. Is there someone here from the NPO?," , Newton, "I have a letter. To Tigard Planner Commissioner from Phil Pasteris, Chairman NPO # 6, Recommendation for denial and referral to NPO # 6 on . application number $ 1-86 Lincoln Savings and Loan. The NPO 6 Chairman has received numerous calls from residents concerned about the above referenced I. II ink applicallion. These calls resulted from the City of Tigard public hearing , = . . ee notice being given after the NPO meeting which addressed these, this application. It is -clear to me as Chairman, that do to notification timing ,.. : that the NPO lacked the input r,nuired to make an informed decision, Subsequent to the NPO meeting the Chairman -hai met with residents and has .... ., determined that they have a sincere interest in the planning process and are ! 0 • willing to work with the Developei: and the NPO in resolving their -concerns. .- -.11 : Therefore, I am asking the Commission to) number one, -deny the applicaLion, _ . , and- number two, recommend that the developers and citizens meet with NPO 6 on r February 19, 1986, to review the proposed development. t Moen, "Is there anyone here from the CCI? Uh, with that we move onto the . public hearing portion of the meeting; Uh, for those in.favor, Mr. Harker has ., already Spoken, uh, Tin Patrick, ' . - . . TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND 8 i-86 Page 4 ct. . ,. . . . , , A 411 (III , . . .. ,,,,,, Patrick, "No comment." '.4. 44 "f Moen, "Okay, with that we will move onto those in obrosition, uh, first Guy Mount. . , 1 ' "My name is Guy Mount, and I live at 9500 SW Riverwood Lane, which is right, '• ee . my family is, right next to adjacent to the proposed eub development. I ,. .. .p. • appreciate th e opportunity to speak uh to the Planning Commizeion this evening 4 . ■ .. and I will be brief. Uh, before I get started I want to do two things, • . First, I want the people present from the Riverwood, the Copper Creek area, .. : the Kneeland Estates, and the 92nd street people who are here to stand and be .t. '... .1 recognized. Uh, secondly, I would like to do two things, one is uh, present J . . _ ..-- a petition that the residents of the area have signed stating some of there -' .tt, e-t , .... - . concerns; and also distribute to you our brief critique of the staff report . v that you all have dated February 4. (pause) " . . ..-- • .: a . 1 Newton„, "You should read what t' - for the record." ., . - Secretary, "I also need a copy of what you give to the Commissioners." • .ee 'v Mount, "The petition says, we the undersigned residents asked for denial of ...i. .. „ . the proposed Lincoln Savings and Loan 1 - 86 / Kneeland Estates III proposed - ..- development for the following reasons: 1. Notification was given after the NPO meeting. Therefore, the residents were not part of the established , ,, • :.: • •:, planning process at the NPO leve/. Number 2, Uncertainty of traffic safety on . i.:..*- the proposed intersection of 92nd and Riverwood Lane and increased traffic n., .., m . flow on Riverwood Land and the proposed extension, Number 3. Concern ., regarding the use of the flood plain and the development of existing natural greenway, Does everybody have a copy? short one. (pause) I just have two . . short items then I will turn it over to some other people who would like to '• --- -.."'- . talk. I have numerous concerns with respect to the plann' d subdivision, because I live adjacent to it, my family lives adjacent to it. Some of those . . issues are going to be talked about tonight, but many of them are not, which leads" me to my overriding concerns and that is that, uh, tiee reeidents in• . . . , .• . ... . •• general were not given notification prior to the NPO 1/ 6 meeting that I , 0, " believe was January 22nd, and as residents we feel strongly that we should . -* , - - have the right to enter the process at the NPO level. We got are notices a .. , ;,,.....• week ago and we feel that its just not right to be able to walk into a process ' you know nothing about and try and uh, act in the property manner. We sort of Feel the meeting this evening is premature and we emphasize our support with Ph41 Pasteris, the Chairperson of NPO # 6, uh, that we should that this, or • 4 .fir. lack of a better word, meeting set aside till the residents, the developer, at and the NPO organization have a chance to get togeth and go over some of these . . to - critical issues. Oh, I, I re-emphasize that. If you -don't 'have any more 1 *, questions of me I would like to turn it over to Liz Collins who is the uh, .. .1 ...! head of Copper Creek Aseociations. She_ has a couple things she - q . . OD - wants to talk about, unless you have any questions. , C5 - ' ....J Moen, "Fortunately Liz Collins is the next .orie on the list," "He knew that. (laughter) Uh, My name is Liz Collins, I'm President of Copper Creek Home Owners Association and uh, Kneeland Estates Homeowners has also asked us to represent thorn since We have a viable organized Copper Cree'e Home Owners Association up and running, We_ are not aWaVe of whether Kheeloknd - - - .. . ., ‘,. ... . . , Ti LINCOLN SAV/NG8 & LOAMD S 1-86 Page 5 ... , , . . :. , .... . . ,- Estates has one or notlkh, you had touch on earlier about the concerns about traffic, We are very confused because in subsection 8 and 9 it had indicated -0 . that there was going to be a turnabout in Riverwood Lane, therefore it would -- , . '.. '•„„- , be a cul-de-sac area, it wouldn't be a thru street on 92nd and Riverwood .. . . . , . i el Lane, But the proposed site map, as well as the developers application , . ....,. . . indicates that there will be a thru street so 92nd and Riverwood Lane would , .., . ,.... . s. . t intersect. We have a real problem with that because 92nd on the up side is a e A'e..... . ... ---,_ blind hill and if that intersects in any way, we feel that could be, there 4."' ''•-• could be possibly potential for traffic fatalities with children and pets, So e e . e .. s '. thats one of our concerns, I think we need to discuss iT we sit down to talk ee- ',. 1 :e . A about this at a later time. Uh, the next thing Is if inieed this, this at . e ... - any tune is approved, you know, we would like to have some type of traffic •. . - •e„ e ... , study done because Copper Creek, excuse me, Cook's Park is a very busy park, ore of the largest in the state of Oregon and if at any time if any of you - . e • : have seen that park or have enjoyed that park during the Summertime you con" imagine what type of traffic flows in tfeseee. Mn ,' Mn of those people would ,.... - .. , . a . probablp like to take their shortcuts thru kiverwood Lane, which would go thru . Copper Creek Development and uh, so thats a real concern of ours too, Uh, I A -. '.'7.. would like to turn it over to someone who wants to talk about the educational blows by adding property or houses to that Oh, I'm sorry - . , okay now where going to talk about the flood plain. Sallyee s - 1.•.e ... ":-., ,..I Moen, "Before we get started with Sally are there any questions?" . s 4. . e • - '• •••. : ,. - ss .... Collins, "I'm sorry was there an questions?" .? s , ,• ... Moen, "I had one question, uh, with respect to the streets here, uh, are you - .. . saying that, what would you propose, do you have a problem with this 4-s connection to 92nd danger of the intersection. .... .'.,.-. . " *.t* Collins, "Yes, because on the up side of 92nd, its a hill, and it, it come • . down, I can demonstrate, It comes down like this and Riverwood would 4 :. 4 intersect this way. Thats a possibility that people could be driving very . quickly along 92nd and there could be a problem," - . . Moen, "What would be your proposal or alternative?" Collins, "That Riverwood would not go thru." .. Moen, "Would not go thru on this end or this end?" • ..., Collins, That end." 1.... al Moen, "This one, ._ • Collins, Well, we would hope that maybe it WoUldn't go thru at all we like , CO it the way it is. We don't want any changes." * . Moen, "I understand that, Okay, Uh,- next Sally Arroyd," - • • s * - - e• Sally- Arroyd, "Arroyd, I live at 9505 SW Riverwood Lane, I'm on the-other . . side of the Mounts but adjacent to lot number four on the Plan,. I would just ' . like to say in speaking for the citizens of Copper Creek, Kneeland Estates, • and 92nd, uh of who were recognized hero. We have a concern with the findings and conclusions of the staff report, With egisting water and sewer A. 4" " • „ ... . ,... ' . TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND '," .4.-86 Page 6 . , ,.. . 4524„ 1 . , • , • , , . 40 0 .,,. ,... ,i. facilities, we want to make sure that its not just adequate. We nave heard horror tales where water pressure goes down and people have to come in a build .... , watr towers and you get into a whole mess of things. We would like a study , ,, , done to make sure that there is more than adequate water and sewer facilities ,.... , .,........ . to handle the expanding development. And we also do have a concern being on P the flood plain and the imp th act of building within e sensitive area. Liz ,-- C mentioned uh, tree comments, erosion, things like that, as far as the engineering plan. We do what a study of that A geological study, whatever ' A...°. - You call it. We want to make sure that there is going to be no unnecessary erosion that will cause anything, any of ( . -s to all of a sudden disappear. : ... • .*-. I'm not making myself very clear, but eire concerned with, in a nutshell, ' '-'-' . , 44 with the sensitive ].and area issue as well as the 100 year flood plain issue. Building in, if you look at the plan there, of core there are three homes . . that will built in the flood plain, but also, part of the street will be in ., . e..: „ the flood plain, And I bell.eve in the Engineering findings that they do mention that none of the road " . . Moen, "According to the map that we have here none of the streets are in the . flood plain. Except for 92nd which goes down into the Park." * ... .... . - . . Arroyd, "Oh, okay, alright its close. Its close, We do want to make sQre that of course the flood plain is maintained, turned to greenway, whatever, Thank you. Those are my comments. e . .... .e. , .., * -. ..'.., Moen, "Okay," ,-. ,, , . .. Arroyd, "Any questions?" . -,,e,,... Moen, "I don't believe so, right now, thank you. Uh, Dan Leslie." . ., e., "My name is Dan Leslie, I live at 9540 SW Riverwood Lane and I'm a concerned t :. .2. - . member of the Copper Creek Homeowners Association. I uh, being an X educator I'm concerned with the growth of Tigard in general and in that area, having . , . . - young children that will be attending school, and knowing that the problems * that the district is having right now with the growth, , . . (coughing) , . . -. '. --1-'? Superintendent , . , . . . , , addressed this very issue today at the high school level, with the high school teachers, trying to get some input on which v''. -.,.,.- new direction they are going to take with the growth of Tigard, It seems that it is going from a very small City, 33rd in Oregon to like 13th in the State, as far as states go and population and I don't think this district is able to keep up with this continued growth that has taken place, Uh, this, this new subdivision would be a optional area, wh.. ch means that the district can go either way yearly on which school the students would attend, They could attend either the Durham Elementary School or the other School, next to the Junior High, Templeton. And, this, the High School right now is experiencing ... . terrible growing pains in that it is built for 900 to 11000 students and its ..,, im- : :3 currently enrolled 1500 to 1600 studunts and they are going to have to build . 01 , additional schools, as it is already, and I m concerned about the growth ' 0 I there, Another issue i dealing with the High School is the traffic creatdd by us ,, the High School and the driving ha.bits of young High School drivers in that area. They already tend to use the hill quite a bit for different playing. ,.. - laughter. . activities, and they do race up and down the hill and they do, ., .., and there is a lot of foot traFfic going thru the-e as well, because they like 4 i to the access to the park during the times that they are not in class, and we feel that this would also bring about some unwanted high school traffic ,thru , . .. ,. - 4 .- .... ■ , 1' / TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS ,t LOAN S 1-86 Page / --- -- _ ^`^ ° . . ' li ".“..4):.1.1.' . ..'... :••' I 4 • , . ,,... . . , • .. -...,.- /(17 .'.,,*;O: ..,* ..,,.1' ',-T., the subdivision and Riverwood as it stands has no stOp signs. Everything comimg into Riverwood has stop signs, it itself has no stop sins and does , leakie itrielf open to quite a bit of fast moving traffic. And we feel like , . . , during times that there are soccer games, and football stames, uh, being J____.., . . attended at the high school that there would be an excess of traffic coming thru that area, where it is not accessible at the current. Any questions? Peterson, "This information your er,p-essing about the schools, is this coming fro)m the school district or is this just your own opinion?" . e. , . ... • .• . • Leslie, "Xt is from the School District. 1 tried to talk to Superintendent ., .% .... '..'-,* 0 Joki myself today, he was not available because he was speaking at the high . •;„; e . ':,•'. school. I get my information thru a teacher there. My wife is a teacher at , . --.s..; .-.., ., Tigard Vigh School, cerrently, and is also very aware of the problem there." : Moen, "Do we have a letter from the School." .. %, : 4;. Newton, "They were notified and had no objection. We always notify the . . . . . • , _e ) ,, — Leslie, "If I may make a comment, The high school principle did make a comment 'Ghat they do not get involved in this type of situation and thats why . they made no comment, because they feel like they can't they're straddling two sides there, they don't want to have anymore growth there," •,, ''-',— ''' ..',4!' ." *, Moen, "What we do, as part of polic,e, staff is required, actually requires , . . , . Newton, "No, we notify the School District Office, and generally we will get ' . „ , , . . either no comment back or some information on the . . . . in this particular - case we have a standard form that goes out and its mailed to them with a copy of the proposal, and an explanation, and in this case, uh, let see, uh right ,.. 4, , . here, yeah right hear, they have checked it and says we have reviewed the ... • . . ,, • propdsal have 110 rebjections and then its signed by the person who and these go to tht district office, . ., . . .., . Leslie, "I concur with what his secretary, , . . . . , she did say that they do get these forms and unless there is any extreme problems they do have no Moen, "Commissioners, do you have any questions?" 4 il '......"......-.;,, ,,'. ill Moen, 'I have time for Rebuttal, you want _yoU ask yoUr ques-ekon hOW or do you .. Z ..,.. Moen, °Okay, That is it as far as those in opposition, u'A, let me go ahea'd , .. ... i . . ",. % with the rebuttal and then we can ask our questions," ' ''4 . — TRANSCRIPT 1 INGOLN SAVINGS & LOAND S 1-86 Page 8 ... .:7/ . ., . .. .. ' ..., . 'Z*.: •. 1 4 40 • .. , . . . , . . •- ...., Moen', "Mr. Harkar, would you like at few minute to rebuttal. We ask that you , e address the issues that have been specifically raised." . , • e . . Harker, "Okay. Very briefly, regarding the Neighborhood Association, I did call Phil Pasteris, two weeks ago, uh, he was aware of the project. I asked v... . . ., . if I could come to the NPO meeting and I went to it and explained the project ...., to the Neighborhood Association, at that time they passed a motion to forward ., ' , - a recommendation for approval to the Planning Commission and today, I talked ,e , . r - to staff, they had apparently changed their mind. I did also, uh, on Friday, e , , .. e-e d was in the City office and met with staff, and at that time, purposely to find . .'..''..., -..',„ oeit who the neighbors would and how to contact some of th* neighbors and at :e ; that time met witK Sally Arroyd, and explained a little bit of what the - . - 1- - project was like and slave her eiy card and offered to meet with the neighbors, uh, on Monday in the day or in the evening, whatever, and ask(ed her to give me .. . Le.... . -..2. a call and I didn't hear anything, but I did offer to meet with them, so as • . . far as the applicaht's concerned we've tried to work with the neighborhood t.ee association and the neighbors, As far as the issues brought up. Its not whole lot different from neighbors who buy on a dead end street, thats stuck . into the woods, its a nice place to live until the inevitable comes and we, ,..- , i : uh. Several items were brought up, one is that Riverview Lane being extended . . onto ? rd would provide a shortcut. And I'm, I'm not sure just where that ' would shortcut to It seems like, rather a non factual statement to say that .. , . .■ 4 it would be a thertcut through somewhere because I'm not aware where Riverview e. , - Lane should shortcut to The connection point, is basically given, there's, .. d. if we move further away from the top of the hill there would be a into the t e" fr flood plain or we switch the connection with Riverview Lane on 92nd as far ., . e ....1 . Ye' south as possible, there is about 300 feet of sight distance available. tie - agree that there is a hill at the top, and uh being an observer that the high school students do come over the hill fairly quickly. And our basic fee1:16g is that thats an enforcement problem, and I'm not sure what we as a developer, representing a developer, could do about that, that type of situation. I sympathize, but, I'm not sure what our perimeters are in there, I don't -Itnow • • to much about that. Is there any questions. ,.. • eti, ', Butler, "Yeah, I had, was there input from the Tigard Water District about service. Newtoh, "I dohlt have the copy of a response sheet from them. .. Harker, "We did receive plans previously when we went thru the process in 81 they, at that time, drew their own plans up and, Uh, drew up plans to service . .'. ' at ".. Pe. the property. There is, there is water at both ends and they, and there would .:: or) . be an intertie, ie what they would like to see happen, between 92nd and .,; Riverwood Lahe, ., , — -Butler, ' "Okay, There weren't any sewer plans, where C.9 _ - - Harker, Sanitary sewer is in ah exisng ti cul- -de-sac and it goesIdo south.- . - 4_. , .several talking4 . . The line does go down into_ the truck line, down by - I■ ■ ...1 .74 Moen, "Commissioner Leverett do you have any questions.' ' .2.. . "' -i . . . , . ..., . - . . . ._ , ' , .....t TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN 8AVINat it LOAND t 1-86 Pago 9 ..„--.. . 4.. , _. . . . Leverett, " - - Lots 1, and 3 there, there is at smal . ortion in the floc plain, Uh, Do you have any idea if you took those out of the flood plain, if , thee would b enough there to meet the requirements?" Harker, "Senitive area? We could provide the area without a problem, . . . what you would end up with is a lot that has a lot of jigs and jogs in it. Leverett, "Yeah, I understand that." Harker, "For the person who buys the lot and trys to build a fence, that • . really frustrating. Newman, "The land between the 100 year flood plain and the street between lots 2 and 3, between 1 and 92ne Ave . . . . , , ." Harker, "We'd dedicate, If I read you right, your talking about the small portions, everything from the street to the south with the exception of the lots would be dedicated to the City. There would be no reason to have flag strips," Wewman, "Here it says you will dedicate area in the flood plain." Harker, "Right, No, are intention would be to dedicate everything to the south of the right—of—way." . - Newman, "And my understanding is that street improvements would be included along those areas?" - Harker, "Thats correct." Newman, "Even though they don't abut a lot:" Harker, "Thats right,' Moen, "Okay, any other questions?" • • • ,„ Leverett, "I was wondering about the sight. - - I know the county • • . , . . —several talking Harker, "I'm not sure what the speed is on that, on 92nd, . • Leverett, "No I mean sight distance over the hill, c6 mer. Harker, "Well, again thats predicated on the speed, If you have a 50 mile 4 road then the sight distance is considerably longer than for 25 miles per hr. ,- I don't , . 92 ' . . . , . .several talking. , , . . - • C-9 u j Moen, "I have a questions for Mr. Mount, uh, give you a chance to address that, I would like to know particular What shortcut, where would the short cut be," Mounts, "Well, I wasn't the one who brought that up, but that brings up another,- good point, uh, directly relating to „ what the gentleman said concerning his efforts," TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND S 1-86 Page 10 , • ' A s w ,.. , .„. . , . ., L . . 411 0 Moen, "I have to ask you to address my questi.on." ri 4 Mount, "Oh, I would be more than happy to do that. Lih, the, what you get, is `'r J• .� 4. �. + you get kids going 50, 60 mile per hour up and down 92nd, And what we don't what have happen is to have, after football games and after soccer parties down at cook Park, having them short cut through Rivemood Lane to get up to ":�,; Durham down by the King City side. Uh, we also don't want to make that just - another avenue out at excessive rates of speed, regardless of what they are ' posted at. Uh, it brings back us to another issue, and thats what the - gentleman said, we didn't know about any Neighborhood Planning Organization .w a - meeting. If we would have had the opportunity to go to that, uh, I would venture a guess that he didn't ':heck to see if anything had been sent out to �- the people who where affected, which it was not, because it was done after the actual meeting on January 22. - Moen, "Meeting requirements i uirements for Npp's is not a requirement." �: Newton, "May I address that one sentence? When an application comes in we notify the applicant to contact the NPO Chairperson, The NPO Chairperson, who is a citizen like all of you, who takes his time and his committees time to `'.., y hold this meeting. They have regular meeting nights in the month and their , agendas are always posted. They call the meeting at their convenience, often e ., - they are held before public notice goes out on the hearing, because of the schedule of the people involved. It often happens, its unfortunate, but the r .:,h way the system is set up its between them and the developer when they want to hold their meeting. . . - . .1 Mount, "Oh, and I appreciate that, and that just reiterates my feeling that as a neighborhood we ought to have, we ought to be down on the ground level., because that directly effects us, And uh, regardless of how much time it •• takes or how difficult it is we feel it should be done," w a,+ Moen, "Okay," Newton, ''Theres no specific uh, . . . . . There's no specific sight * :'} distance requirement, and I think thats probably why the Engineering „.,� I; 4 Department asked for the traffic study, r , d Secretary, "President Moen, I would like to make one comment! That we are looking for people who are interested in becoming members on the NPO and if anyone would be interested, that if the would contact me at G. y � y at City Hall I would • - r err i be happy to give them an application.'' � 69, r "What it boils do the way Moen, down to is thats i.he wa you find outs whats- going on in the NPO is that someone from your neighborhood organization be active in that We do have a problem, you should all be aware of that state law puts us CD under a constraint that under a certain amount of time from the time the - ' H developer application if we don!t rows it to that period of time' • rocessedswith ball appeals, n. . P p submits his application until we have co have i t completely 1 _ processed with either a ieh or ney its automatically approved at submitted. So we are ,; under a tight time constraint. It for- everybody, to help the ;�9 1 working y developer and to help the whole process l . . . , so We don't get b.:+dened down," S ' TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND S 1-86 Page 11 a , . .. e,...*.•'..: ':' -, . . . , ., .. . . ,. . . Mount, That brings up nother issue that I think youllight want to be aware - 0f, , and that is you might what to have the traffic study done during the summertime period of time, where you get a lot of people into Cook Park. , , ..... . . . ... Right now you don't have the traffic flow going back in there. Moen, "We will have to take that into account as part of our decision . . .,. . , process. Any other questions Commissioners? With that I close the Public Hearing Portion of the Hearing. Commissioners?" .. .' ." . . t.,.1".0 Newman, I think its appropriate, its a little late . . . tape ended I live on the extreme other end of Riverwood Lane, three lots from the other _ end, so I probably should just state the fact that I don't think that my . . . . .- . living that close to the neighborhood will affect my ability to be objective . „ in this particular situation. Although I have had a lot of input from people in the neighborhood. _ e Moen, "Okay, maybe you could if there has been anything that asn't been brought up, maybe you could enlighten us to some of that input when the time comes. Commissioner Butler, do you, I'm going to go down the line to get „. . ., , _ , - comments, then we'll make our decision. Commissioner Butler?" . Butler, "I have no comment." ' -- -- - Moen, "Commissioher Peterson" I.: - . Peterson, "Well I was a little concerned about the possible lack of notice, ' -..: 1 • the citizen had, but there does appear that there was some attempt made. The . ye. q other concern I had is uh, possibly, there is some problems with the traffic on Riverwood Lane, but I do believe that that street probably ha$ been shown A . that is was going to be a thru street and if anybody would check, they Would have seen that As far as the rest of the subdivision, 'would be flood plains and such, I don't have any problem, Moen, "Okay, I have one quick question for staff? If I understand it right, the rest of, the adjoining subdivision is developed right up to this lot line . , at this point." `\ Newton, "It's a developed subdivision," • ...., ;.; 11, " ' Moen, "The road ends right where — ." ,., m • Newman, "And there are houses built on those lots and they are occupied," i x !! co - Moen, "Commissioner Borgmann? >, Bergmann, "We have two or three points, one being those two lots that ... 00 potentially have- double access, It would seem logical to Ille that all the :. , .... houses should front the same street, Riverwood Land, but there might '.)e some- - . U.I . - them . reason why t'm not aware of, as to why it be better to have h front ."- ...1 (in 98rd Avenue. But it seems that neighbors adjacent to them, and that they ..,. ought to have street house numbers and houses that face the same direction - instead of having back yards facing Riverwood Lane, 1 don't see an problem with lots I, 2, and 3, slightly encroaching in the flood plain, that going to be just lawn and fence, and in most cases the house could not be built in the flood- plai n- area Erigineeriqg Department. has required traffic study, even , TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND S 1-86 Page 12 , . . • .7., - . 1# • . though, that is a tig intersection created, , , . , , Alk . . . . . There was a -...,, , . ., .— question about number 8 and 9 A street is a thru street, is that 8 & 9 -•- - , would both be stricken from the recommendation." . . e •• .. .. . ' Newton, "The concern was that we might not be able to make this improvement because actually whether or not the two improvements would meet, physically ..° ee •-• . ....... . .. meet because of the property line. The survey Department has determined that . - they will if germane. So, I talked with Randy Clarno this afternoon and he ..,) had asked that the improvements be required and that the streets be required ;. - . to connect." ... Bergmann, "So that would strike number 8 and Butler, "So we change number 8 to SW Riverwood Lane would connect to the Copper Creek Development and in number 9 . — . , several people talking. . . . it says something about a turnaround in number 9. . .. . . _ - several talking not transcribable , .... - Bergmann, "I don't think it would ba possible to let that dead end •. • • 'e- much, much to long for safety for emergency vehicles II ., . ■ '1 • - Moen, Commissioner Newman?: .. 4. . " .. ,• Newman, "I only have two concerns, I think, knowing the neighborhood, I think the lot size are in character with the layout and fits in real well But, I . , do have some serious concerns. The connection of Riverwood Lane to 92nd will - . make a major change in the chaoacter of the neighborhood thats already there, because of the change in acces . Uh, Regardless of whats suppose to happen on , ... .. "7"-- ' 92nd, in fact there is a lot of traffic that goes very fast there. The . neighborhood has a lot of very young children, and there is very little traffic down ih the neighborhood that isn't people who live thare because .., , . . . there is no connection, its not on thM -way to anywhere: If you connect • k '• , If Riverwood Lane through your going to open that up very easily to allow the *.e.efe ' . traffic to coming out of Cook Park . , — , . . . drive around tfel: high school. Not : that I have anything against the High School, I spent the allotted time there . . . • myselP and drove around a lot while I was doing it. But, I have some very * se- ' real concerns with Rivetwood Lane being connocted. The second thing is that ,,: where it connect on 92nd, uh, I'm familiar with 92nd in that strip, and, I don't it thats going to be a good intersection, Because of the nature of the traffic on 02nd, I'Ve fine, it hard to envision a connection there that %4 .! EL ' going be safe. And those two concerns av-e very real to in The rest of it seems fine. The encroachment on the flood plain is as was mmtioned is fence I I— , and lawn. tt makes a lot more sense to do it that way than to make it all co , , twisty and turhie , , , . , , , . . . , . . . . , doesn't do anybode any good. But I think 't t: that, I mean, my feeling is I think that maybe the developer needs to go back, •.; ....g ,, get together with the people in the neighborhood and work out some way to meet , 00 0 ' the concerns- of_ the traffic, Uh,- because as I say, / think it make a - iLi 4 substantial difference :;,.n character -of that neighborhood. . .J - - - - ..., , _ . ...., Moen, "Commissioner Leverett?" - , • Leverett, "Well, , . „ , . „ It appears to meet all thr.1 criteria, I also have concerns for the intersection, t don't exactly see 4ny way of , I don't know what the speed limit is but I knoW theses some pretty fast traffic e . „ TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAM) S 1-86 Page 13 - .. , . -: .. .Y, ... . - . • coming down 92nd. I rea . .y don't know how to deal with 110 cul—de—sac from the other way, it meets all the criteria, I guess thats my only concern and I don't know how to deal with any suggestions , . . Moen, "Staff the applicant mentioned this tract "A", does staff have a problem with making tract "A" an access to the property. I don't quite understand Weil, you had a problem with the fact that Riverwood would not continue across to something. Right?" Newton, "Yes." Moen, "And you where saying that something should be done with lots 17, 18, to allow for that." Newton, "Well, the concern is that we don't just deadlock this area and treat it as a no mans land, This may not necessarily be the best option. If we • could get a offset of, according to Randy Clarno of the Engineering Division, of at least 300 feet, or about 300 feet, that wouldn't be as major of a concern. . • • Moen, "Right, but we're talking here of a offset of only 150 feet, Newton, "My suggestion, I guess, on that, since I don't have a map that deals with that whole area, is to tie it up think the suggestion I would have too, would be, if you do decide to adopt the condition on the traffic study that yc,,a have the applicant look at 92nd and ways to mitigate turning from 92nd onto Riverwood Lane. sevutral talking Moen, "Newman?" Newman, "Uh, If, if the recommendation from traffic was that lot 16 only be •t A accessed from Riverwood, my guess is that partly because of the steepness of the street." Moen, "Plus the fact that 92nd is a minor collector." • Newton, "But then so is Riverwood, I might add." - - ,several people talking Newman, "What about lots 17 and 18, wheres there access? I mean 92nd is still 92nd. -several people talking — , Some one from audience asked if Commissioner could please speak up, Moen, "I'll try talking louder." laughter. . . Newton, "I don't see anything in the actual conditiens." '.. Butler, "Remember when I asked you in the very beginning about that? Engineering Department had a coicerned with it and it hasn't really been addressed, IL■ • k' TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS LOAN° S 1-86 Page 14 • „ - . . NI . .. Qwton. "Right, its nolillist 4 ed as one of the conditions, Modn, "I guess I would 15.21,e to take this opportunity to make a couple of 4, .' comments. Uh, I, we have a responsibility to the whole neighborhood to provide access for emergency vehicles and a lot of other things, we try to cut . '.... - . down on the number of cul-de-sacs, if at all possible. I can understand the . .. neighbors concerns, based on the fact Oat this is Cook Park, but I think that .. ,.,e - the overriding concern is that we need the access from emergency vehicle ,:-„-, standpoint. One other comment I would make is, requiring the developer to put ...,. .„. sidewalks down the length of 92nd, basically on both side, uh, would have a • strong benefit for the public, in terms of access, for example between the ,.. A. .. .., soccer fields . . . . seen people walk up and down that all the time, and it is a problem. . . . - - „ . . . , . . . With that I would like to see some condition • •- s. on lot 17 and 18 to be, there approval to be reserved until such time that the ,,,•• .. ' -' traffic study shows that we don't have a problem with connecting up I think thats a good idea - . „ . . . . . „ . . . . . . . . Traffic study should find ways . to mitigate the impact on Riverwood Lane. , . . . • • • , , • • • I think -.. , .• - that the item on lot 7 and 9, should be restricted to access on one public . ..., ... roadway, uh, the same roadway ." Newton, So you would like to see it on Riverwood Lane," . • .„ Moen, "I think it ought to be Riverwood Lane. I guess what we need is a -' motion. ° "v„,,, talking among Commissionerfnot transcriable. . . . , ,.. ..r ...,,,, Newton, The traffic study is going to have to be approved by, realistically ' ":: ' ..f. by the Engineering Division before they record the plat. Uh, you know they '. • will have to have gone thru public improvement drawings and all that. Do you IL have a problem with that. - - several people talking , . . . Moen, "Commission Butler would you care to make a motion." :. .7. ' Butler, "Yes." Moen, "Your bu0.1y scribbling away there, so I going to put you . . • C,"-ic'•.,.:, Butler, "Yeah, I make a motion that we approve Subdivision S 1-86, with the conditions submitted except those that we are going to change. Okay, Number 8 ' ag • we're going to scribble out, and were going to make it "Riverwood Lane will connect with Copper Creek Development, Now is that clear? Moen, "Is Copper Creek the adjoining development?" ... .„..4 - OR - Butler, "Yes, to yes to the west. And number 9. we're-going to scratch out ' C) uu ,.. completely. _ Number l . After the period. tothe Engineering Section period. 1 Then well put uh, Riverwood one easterly access shall also be ;Addressed at this time, uh and then, I want to say somothing, I didn't get this far, this - . is where I stopped, You want to address lots 17 and 18 platting, once the - traffic report is in they can decide whether they want to or not plat 17 and . . 8 or take Track "A". So somebody can be creative and ... • . . . . _ . . - . . . TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND 9 1-86 Page 15 . . , . . " .. .. . . . 4 . Moen, Ri.verwood Lane ,,treet access shall also be i 'css along with the ....�: plotting of lots 17 and 18 and Tract "A". Butler, "plotting of lots 17 and 18 and Tract "A", and the dedication of tract "A" , ° M . . ,several taldcar�g ( oeri, On 11. we would like Newman, "Access onto I'i'iverwood Lane,,' ., Butler, "Okay, 7 and B, Is that how the City has it planned fo),. Riverwood Lane, `- Newton, "It doesn't really matter" Moen, "Why don't we just spay the. they are restricted access one way or the • other." Newton, "They both need to face the same direction." Butler, Okay, then 11. should be, restricted to the same public road. Then 14. Applicant shall dedicate lands within the 100 year flood plain, except. Newman, "Can we reword that to say that anything south of the road that is 1 ° not is not in lots 1, 2, and 3 Butler, Right, and then also he will still have to go thru the Sensitive t - -, Lands Hearing to get that cleared, so there shouldn't be any problem with that because he even though he is going within in that he won't be building within that He'll still have to go for a Sensitive Lands. Newton, "Sensitive lands only goes for any kind of development, platting of • the lot is not development, digging one shovel of dirt i;;." i' Butler, "Okay." e . Newton, "Steep slopes, drainageway, , doesn't matter what it is sewer line M•w drainage." .'' v. Butler, "Some of it is." IE Newton, "Yes, and thats addressed to." •y " , i . l . i i sevei al talking, r Butler, Other than that I didn't have ar y.. more that except to include that the staffs prepare the final order and President Moen sign off on that final order: Moen, "We have a motion, do We have a second." Commissioner Peterson, "Seconid '► jt • y - TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND S 1-86 Page 16 • 411 111 Moen, "Further discussion. All those in favor of the motion signify by aye. Commnissioners Moen, Butler, Peterson, Bergmann, and Leverott Aye. Moen, "Opposed?" ', Newman, I'Ney.10 �YY Moen, "Wa have one in opposition, motion carries five to one •y + 1. I . TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOANb S 1--86 Rage 17 • • ,e a a . TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION M, 4 REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 4, 1986 . 4� 1. • President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:33 PM. The meeting was held at Fouler Junior High School, 10965 SW Wairut, LGI Room. 2. ROLL CALL President Moen, Commissioners Butlar,' 'Peterson, Bergmann, , Newman,, and Leverett (arrived 7:40). • Absent: Commissioners Fyre, Owens, and Vanderwood. e. Staff: Senior Planner Elizabeth Newton and Secretary Diane 11. _ Je lderk s. e. { 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Newman seconded to approve a minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority vote. Commissioner Bergmann abstained 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION: -. President Moen announced that item 5.6 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 1-86, ZONE • CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 1- 86, SUBDIVISION S A-0 L 6 had been withdrawn from the agenda. p . T; . 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS . K,„ 5.1 SUBDIVISION S 1-• 86 LTN�L�1 'BAi�9GS•pND LCoAN/KNEELAN�D'EST'�►�'`ES III•NPR 6 g Request to subdivide a 8.68 acre parcel into 18 lots, with a minimum lot .5 (Residential 4.5 � �...; .....,,,�,.�.� o� n property'� ..�..��te'�.,-and size of , 7,!5� s ft. units/acre LQ a�ttd. ise ri: Cook Park, west of ;:. F ) Tigard High Schpol (ZS1 /4A, Ira 900). ° p senior Planner Newton reviewed the staff report making staff's : recommendation for approval, modifying cend;tions number 8 and 9. r; APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION . Norm Harker, 1750 SW Skyline Blvd. , Portland, representing Lincolf Savings and Loan, agreed with the staff report: He stated they would be willing to dedicate Tract ''A" for right-of-Was. He requested clarification on bonding for streets, if if builder could determine frontage f public improvements were limited `o lot frontages, . r condition 11, and if dedication is , only limited to land within the 100 year flood plain. Staff responded that public improvements coule be bonded, That the public improvements ,', were- required along- entire property line not just lot frontages. If the builder determined access one lot could end up one direction ar' the other lot could face the o pp osite direction, which is what staff wanted to avoid, Also, the city had ih the past accepted property which was not within the 100 year flood plaih. fir. PLANNING GOt'' 'M1,SSTON MII Nl11 Pi rLoRuAin , 1006 Page I M ..,„I ..,,. ,, , 46( . . NPO C0 TENTS .� Senior Planner Newton read into the record a request from NPO # 6 Chairman to postpone the hearing to allow for another NPO meeting. , PUBLIC.TESTIMONY /j J,.. . "^. a Guy Mount, 9500 SW Riverwood Lane, requested the people stard and be '°= recognized who where here to support a denial of this application. He ' read and submitted a petition, signed by 27 residents, into the record requesting denial of the application, He requested that the meeting be f set aside to allow more citizen input.4. p r o Liz Collins, 16545 SW Copper Creek, President of the Copper Creek Association, also representing residents from Kneeland asked that the ' application be postponed. They understood that Riuerwaod La would be a • cul—de—sac. They where concerned about traffic onto 92nd, that tr�affi.c from Cook Park would use Riverwood as a shortcut. 9iscus,eion followed regarding the"street Connection at 92nd and Riverwood Lane. o Sally Arroyo 9505 SW Riverwood Lane, adjacent to lot # 4 was concerned `: that 'the existing water and sewer were adequate Y She wanted a study of , , the Sensitive Lands as well as the 100 year flood plain to be maintained. o Dan Lesue, 9540 SW Riverwood Lane, was concerned with the growth and the ' r. • '11.,1 effect it would have on the schools. Tigard Nigh School era r^o l lment • i s "', � already above the number of students that the school was built for He . . as concerned what affect the traffic would have on Risen ood ,dur, games. Discussion followed regarding the School District not having any . , % objection i . REBUTTAL . • Mr, Harker stated they had neighborhood participation through the NPO• -e e,, process and they had moved to support the development. He had also - `:« offered to meet with other neighbors. He questioned where p._ople would . w .. A short cut to from Cook Park, As for the speed on 92nd, that was an e t; enforcement issue and did not know what he as-the developer coi ld do, L , o Discussion followed regarding the Water District response (no comment was � a. ' received), portions ans of lots , ,, and 3, being in the flood pain and what �, e would happen if they were removed Lengthy discussion regarding the Cie traffic study and connection of SW 92nd and Riraeewood Lane. Mr, Newman commented that he lined at the other end of Riverwood Lane, a, ? PUBLIC HEARING CLOS t _ _ o Commissioner Butler had no comment Y - - y y PLANNING 1.',OMml ee as mi Nu rk. , ec epUAft' e, i 9i?6 Page 2 w ' ,- ,... .:.: . a - - ,, . — ... . ,, , . . .- — . .- . o Commissioner Peterson was concerned with traffic if Riverwood. was made a ' . ' through street. o . Commissioner Bergmann, felt the two lots with double access should both ' '• . ....... -. .. front on Riverwood Lane, He had no problem with lots 1, 2, & 3 'Le' encroaching into the flood plain. Lengthy discussion followed regarding , . e,, striking conditions numbers 9 and 9 A i• ..4 ...o 'Of 7.• ..• o Commistioner Newman felt the connection at 92nd and Riverwood would be a J - major chanea to the character of the development and was concerned because . 7- - r.... .. of the num4me of young children in the neighborhood. He was concerned ..`. 4., ' - where the connection would be made onto 9Cfeld for safety reasons. He , . . e- . 2,.. - - ' supported having the proposal go back to the NPO. .1 . 0 o Commissioner Leverett felt the criteria had been met and was concerned . - w!th the 92nd connection, but not sure how to deal with it o Commissioner Moen asked about dedication of Tract "A" and the problem with access. Lengthy discussion followed. Commissioner Moen felt it was the C responsibility of the entire neighborhood to cut down on cul-de-sacs, because of the access for emergency vehicles, He felt sidewalks on 92nd would be a benefit. Further discussion on a traffic study * Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to approve S 1-86, modifying condition number e to read: SW Riverwood Lane will ..., connect Riverwood Lane with the developMent to the west (Copper Creek) . 11., Eliminate condition number 9. Modify condition number 11 to read: Double - e frontage lots, namely 0 7 and 8, shalL be restricted to access the same , public roadway. Modify condition number 13 to add: The Riverwood 4 easterly access to be addressed after the ;''raffic study, also lots 17 and A 18 be platted and that Tract "A"...beedediec'Ad to the City once the traffic -- _ .........„. ..i. study had been done. Modify condition number 14. -by 'adding: "and '.. property south of the road not platted into lots 1, 2 and 3." Also, . i . request staff to prepare the final order and for President Moen to sign "''' - if. 4 - -. : that final order, , ' Ah* V' Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioner Newman voting no ' 12,., 5,2 SUBDIVISION S 2-06 VARIANCE V 1-86 ELIZABETH BUTLER/SAMOEL GOITER NPO # 6 • ' EC Request to subdivide a 1,37 acre parcel into 7 lots, minimum lot size 7500 -.1 l'Z' sq. ft, ; and for a Variance to alloW a 600 ft long cul-de-sac where 400 ,'..., • , ft, is required, cl property zoned R-4.5 (Residential 4.5 units/acre) ..f. 5* Located: 335' west o 8W 93rd and Si Inez (WCTM 2S1 11BA lot 1400) , .- •Zi d , - , E5 Senior Planner Newton reviewed the staff report noting this concerns s . -E IA. i regarding the cuI-de-sac versus a through street; the problet with the 1 size of the ;lots, the need for a tree cutting-permit, . tha bike path e- and 1 ' made staff's recommendation for approval with 11 conditions. . , , 1 _ e _. • ., NPO COMMENTS .,.. , . Senior Planner Newton road a letter into thi.., reqUest from NPO # 6 Chairmen , ., ...ee , recommending denial and thaE the ariplination be returned to the NPO to be , reviewed by the cone:erned .neighbort , d, . .... , PLANNING COMMISION MINOWn I rotwooy 4, 1986 Page 3 ' .1 A . . s ., .. . ,.., , .„ . ; ' ; ' : rr ti fb y'. a+FF} +r { i�; ' . r P}W♦ i , ,. +.Ci v{ IIF 'if;.?''''.4 II,'l'f'..4,IV If.',"trigt9t ,.., '. +C r1t 1atx.+M O ,,. a • ..+.s 7 "�^ �.., S J 71/ d , tIodtn1 ivg, co it,gi 17/4 PI Zit .: ",„.....,,..:,:.. s e , ..., ", /,-P 4,0e,r)14,L , .7#DI A ii•',441. 1. if. . , . 4 1 ,,,.., ,....-.:,.. I eV141.,. .. .. it of t , . - . ,f ♦ v I owe / o •,r, r•r vflfift 't 0; . � .. „ ,, , iiiikif 0 -- /tt( 0 Ale . 11, 777/,..... . , . .. 0., ,,,. ... 7-10.0 f 4i6”' / 461 ' ."' ‘e ., /1 e 1 „, r 7 ' ,, ...;P:Aiiiii /19 aPrt)Ces$5 i4r r•-..,,, c/vpo aile,L ,--. . ....., , ._.: 4 . ..o.. .... .,. ., , U Via', a„,,, „AA 1 A., 1.' CA, 6 0 11 4/' . :61) an wir ,I 1 '-'-: :: v H wy 'ibi ."...Civ, 4 , . ,, ifilrhe9 hi Al lie° •1 12 11 • .,.. .,.,t... .., ar oc ... ]Y , i ott, MI : •- vtiw..: ,, ., ,.. • ..,i.,. .. .. 1 a■ a p r , pe4 v y Pc1crct?ivJ I ' - 4 3) 4! aretefrip, -- i44.1.1� .. e . '' :p,r eei«/. �,l M5 in 4(4,:- It rx I ,L, : - eeiet 14-74a c • . n•.. ... . � r + � ,• . , . . . . ,_ ,, . ,. .. .... •, ... „. . ., ,d... . ..„ • ,. ,..40 .,, * 'a i a . � F. am: P : I■ ,A . :, I/ 4 .4_.- -'- ---;,.ei) A _• 6 wi.roe, ”' ,:'.e. ...,, ,,, I 1 ,£,4;t. ., ,, 1 U d tt: — `i,)C C `-)-L-(.., r' ./L'. , ' .C. L. . .-1: 1. :: 3 o , - :,47/17e-42,6'.4 1 / /6_5''30 .,.:je,-..; „, ,....ui -, li ,...4., , . 4 et /I. y /.‘. J ' /I ., . (i,.---)7_,/,,,,,,-.ilkizoL-A---. vA.,,r.c.:,....,-3.,-)... ., I/6 /(C--5)- -5764) 4-1--)d741—cl iitit..e.r.' .- . i � « a u ♦« 9 ,, r j .� t, S .t,. •'°r'•. — 1 i ,"! -it,7 r , r, t 1, ' C eff • tl r r 1 ,. . . 1,....' 1. M es" d N ... ,, ...�.,. ,'•'ire •� -�-�, ,, .,t,..h , .,, 1 ' 9N2A:10 3,(A) ArigtittApt (-) :c-,..,..a....____. ; ,,, ci-Nk A Am, ‘sp,,ti... ,, ., . ., ,.., 170 1 /blie.ae.-14-1. ;i„,"4 - l'' ''' 96;10 . 1-4) evat.. /44,,,,-frod A6,414?.■• . • 0 ti exit,,A. 1 ,,e-•L Art A. 56 0 -,50,.) 4 e , ,• La/Lt.•.''.VC, F-t-t. , .• ,...•.,.... •...: ) t"‘" ' �,/ l! . j - 951;7) Z�fi� ' .�� L Cd) ,U GC • ) i , ii, 'S .1�1 • � �- 9 5„?0 ,,4.eL) ;\ ,tt 6,...e..7.4',ek ‘7.,(1. � 0 / .s!/7.,i/'� / 5 a�'5" s uq F', to. .,-•• r • q ' ,,-.. . ...` VW, ) -. 963(6- :7-...-1,:d V'14.4.fr,.. ..t jot... , ., 0 /. % - , ,/�7� A,.� � /6/. ,�. ►'�G' e.„,.- . . -. _..... - ', 9770 ski ro. N n '' i - • ,` • 1. 1 :� ', ' y /. ,..,.,. :,‘ ... .,, .... .-. _ ,. .... ,jez ...<„, ....,..,9,7, , ,. (74c. i,...,))et...9,.,„ ,1_r__, ' 6417, , Z • ... .. /fre-/1611 ,5(. f d C2t 44 . .""`"`_" ...w-••••«•.+r.•+-*.*rwwi.«...+w•...»... 9.1<..114 a °g 6✓r (� 0' , //5114"' U. � '1,U•(,I 0) ‹. te,/ .,..... i 61.in,1.1 1 1.4..4f' / , 7 j .. _cid," r lb 0 .it ./..:r C JJJ .,,., (,,,...) ,t,...„.i " -4,--..„4,,--tos-r0 j.--v ' �� it i".1)-.\\I i i,1• Lt..r 44. e.k... ,6a-,� r .• 1 1. -r _ s al 1 i �. - . = 'i . -,�fl .! c... • f, i�IYI�:'!•,.Sid.w,.Ya tU. - ';n r •W `�4 i JI 11-m..rw mlw --- .. ...ft '. .... i, III II r Febuary 4 1986 ,Tigard Plannin Commission „i Fowler Junior High School-LGI 10865 SW Walnut Tigard: Oregon 97223 , Re: Agenda Item 5.1 - , t , Subdivision S 1-86 4 - On behalf of the homeowrers of Copper Creek Development it is our J. desire to addrees the snaff report regarding issues which have been raised. We are unable to support any development in the proposed area until specific issues are clarified and expanded % , Upetle - SECTION B. Findings and Conclusions Sub Section A: Surrounding property owners were not given notice prior to the NPO #6 meeting. As owners we were not given any NP opportunity to consult with the O concerning how, and by what ' 1 process the NPO deals such issues. Sub Section C: Section C states "Policy 3.2.1 will be satisfied because development within the 100 year flood plain will be avoided." After reviewing the proposed site map it appears at least lots 112rand 3 will directly be within the 100 year flood ■ t 1 '. 1, ' plain. These inconsistenceS are at best confusing .., ..„. i Sub Section C Section E states "Policy 7.3.1. and 7.4.4 are satisfied because adequate water and ewer facilities are z., available to the development.° Question: Has the developer had any studies done to show what the impact of the proposed water and sewage facilities will do to the existing supplies of Copper , Creek? SECTiON C Rec /mendations C 1 .., Sub Section 8 and 91 Both sections indicate the potential of .,- having a turn-a-round/one (1' ) foot reserve strip at the end of w. Riverwood Lane in the event Riverwood does not continue/connect at the western section. The proposed site map as well as the developers application indicate that Riverwood Lane and 92nd will be "pushed through" and connected. As Homeownert 4e are very .i.. confused as to which is being proposed--connected cr not connected. Sub Section 132 It is the Homeowners extreme concern tht_tbe ,., , increased traffic flow from Cook Park could be a very real - problem. Cars will reach speeds of 60+ miles per hour on 92nd at - -- times. In the event Riverwood Lane is connected With 92nd the potential for traffic fatalities invoiJing children could be '. enormous. The upper portion of 92n6 iAmediately above the :.. 4 _ . . _ . . . . - . . , _ , , , ,. , , ,- . . j.--,,,, - .--. .,---\ - . ' ' / . ., -,, : v, - , '• , , • ,-. .., ,,,,- .. - , ....., 411 4,,. , , . . . ., i • Ar . .. • fie. r development is a blind hill. The potential of cars� Qposed de�relo mer "blind hill" at excessive speeds into Cook :q Park nagaingcauses"the exhatin Homeowners grave concern. }� r ' g wish to state we are not ,:� We again w�. ` � t in favor of the. proposed � `� development as it stands today. We are very concerned that specific issues have not been discussed and or have been confused :k,, and ever simplified. It is our desire that bT,,'fore any farther ". action is taken on this matter we the Homeowners of Copper Creek ` as well as other adjacent landowners affected have the opportunity to meet with the developer in conjunction with the • , O $6 to discuss specifics in greater detail before any plan is •a 5rought before The Tigard Planning Commission. Respectively Submitted,et4//tf $1,. , ,---- , dr)? e;;1./.2,,,,,i, ,,g 4,/, eiL i . .. Concerned Citizens of Copper Creek ill' I • r; i i. • a. '. r vi n . . p - — A- - w ., �u4° ,.. ! ' `. T0, Tigard Planning CoLmnais s are February 3, 1986 7 FROM: Phil Pastc ris Chairmen NPO # 6 SUBJECT:' Recommendation for denial and referral to NPO # 66: Application # S.,2 S6 & V 1 -86 Samual A Gotter III (WCTM 253 11BA lot 1400) Application # S 1-"36 Lincoln Savings & Loan ,: {WCTI 2S1 14A lot 900) The NPO 1/ € .na , maaxi, has received numerous calls from residents concerned -,. about the ab(.,i e referenced applications. These calls resulted from the r City of Tigard Public Hearing notice being given after the NPO meeting which addressed these applications. It is clear to me as Chairman that ca J a, due to notification tiring the NPO lacked the input required to make an informed decision. i Subsequent to the NPO meeting, the chairman has met with these residents and has determined that they have a sincere interest in the planning process and are ;:i'lling to work with the developer: and the NPO in resolving their 'yY `, .' concerns. . ni trr�rp��s Therefore, I am aakang the Commission to 1) deny both applications and; . . 2) recommend the developers and citizens meet with NPO # 6 on February 19, 1986, to review the proposed developments. 0a et 4 e r v ,•r sm a a 'L . . a. r • ,....y t 4J G,it. 4l uy".,.: . I.-. .,.. 7 • r NOTICE; ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN TI1ELL NAM!. 4. and note their address on this sheet. (please Print your name) i ITEM/DESCRIPTION: :a',- I I cl-;,,, 5 1 _____a_,Lt, e g5JI- JJTT , i.. .I Sf si„.1.,!,, ..,,, •: n . ('-:) / , , \ n lor'• ,. .,ei., ,,.. -- /i . . / - ' . ' /.. i ' eiCilP <L. PROPONENT_ (For)�.. ) OPPON NT (against) Name, Address and Affiliation I Name, Address and Affiliation Pba' - L -.'' C R- ,3-U 0 G + / LJ tl TIe b. 1 Sry�!t ltdpJ �N T" 9 SrU 'S�f/ '�v7�r..ic i . r 7 U K ,. . 2 , a ,7 ,,• 1 a y 4/_./..„!/.1,1,(, ./iff" ....4 '..,m.:.1,P,21 '....eolo'e-- • ., 1 .... • I ..._. -..ate 1_.. .» • ai :mow. '• ... -... . _. Y..'' a . YI . r'a 4•y. 4 a -Yi,r4 .-, :\ 4 , ...,. ... STAFF REPOR I AGENt)A I rEM 5, 1 a l~'EFJRUARY 4, 1,986 -.� 7;30 P.M. ' • •�: TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION b; .. FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI ‘ " • 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON 972.23 A. FACTS 2, . .4•. 1. General Information CASC: Subdivision S 1-86 a ~ REQUEST: To divide 8.60 acres into 18 lots with a minimum size of 7,500 square feet. ',. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential r } ZONING DESIGNATION R-45 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre) . 4 t APPLICANT: Lincoln Savings and Loan DINER; SAME .: . 102:50 SW Greenburg Road Portland, OR 97223 >': y. LOCATION: West of 92nd Avenue between Kneeland Estates Nor, SCI and Cook r,. . ".:. Park 1 - 2. Backc "und • ,. •r' :. Pr yiiminary plat approval was granted in 1981. (S 11-80/CPR 12-81) for 22 .F.., attached and !!i detached single family residential lots. The final plat was never recorded and the approval has expired, • , 3 . Vicinity iCnformation • Kneeland Estates No. 2 lies to the ndrth and Tigard High School is . to this ss area.the The Copper side of 92nd Avenue `The R�-4 5 .zone applies ...__,' pp Creek development which is zoned R-7 (PD) ; (Residential, 7 units/acre, planned developreh ) r• ,lies immediately west and Coo; Park abuts the southern boundary of the property, ; C 4, Site infOrmation • hp� cy i s rr�s eri �y urd�ve lo p ed, 7 he to terrain downward r . 1M � , north to south wt ,,h yrades or up to 10% in the northern -portion of Lh e - ,� site The southern half of the property- is wi-thin the 100 year flood , - plain., - • " W.y , M 14 a_ : . yAr i RE 'OU I S 1. 8U - PAGT 1 I .t " x .4 ,,. 1 C r iyRi •.f f, •,r ": X' ..v . , .. .ii 410 III . ...„., ,..,....,,,, The applicant propo:,us to divide the property into 18 single family , ..,- . ..: q. , . residential lots, all with a minimum si4e of 7,500 square feet. , , Riverwood Lane will be extended from its terminus at Copper Creek to •. , 92nd Avenue, In addition to Riverwood Lane, four lots will have - frontage on the 93rd Avenue cul—de—sac in Kneeland Estates No. II, Although this proposal represents a reduction in the number of lots from ,'..'. 27 to 18, the subdivision layout and street alignment are very similar . /'.. ..., - to the proposal that was approved in 1981. A ..".. . - 5. fatasyAapNPO Comments, , .• A .:*......;.*........ The Engineering Division has the following comments: . . • e a. Lots 17 and 18 on the east side of 92nd Avenue will preclude the , •. ; ,. extension of Riverwood Lane to the east, The applicant should be able to show that other reasonable alternatives exist for _ . •:,•.. 7 :, providing access to the property to the east, ,e .. ; ; a•p b, The issue of stormwater runoff presents several problems which must be clarified. Stormwater through "Tract A" from the school .... property and 92nd Avenue needs to be addressed along with the• ,..- * gulls through Lots 10, 11, and 12 and the drainage over Lot 8 in .: the event of a catch basin failure on the 93rd Avenue cul—de—sac, ,.. . - c„ A private pond is located above Lot 12. Liability for ,,...::.. - flooding caused by the pond and the right of this owner to release . e..--,. water onto Lot 12 is unknown, , . , . d. Slope easements along Riverwood Lane will be necessary, e . . , ,.. , ... : . - ,. .... e If Riverwood Lane does not connect with the completed portion in .. ..,., ,e.,.., Copper Creek, a temporary turn around will be necessary . . f, Lots 7 and 8 have double frontage and access semuld be limited to ..„, . . one street, The access for Lot 16 shall be limited to Riverwood Lane. ....., . . -...'...e'' g . A traffic report is needed indicating what measures should be taken to mitigate the site distance limitations at the proposed 4 11. •.;,... Riverwood Lane/92nd AvenUe intersection . .'.' ''. EL h, The applicant must provide stormwater runoff report addressing . ' rg proposed on and off site stormwater and erosion control during and ., co after construction. 4bis report must address the impact of 11'. upstream drainage facilities and the mitigation of adverse stormwater impacts upon City Park and, greet-may areas ,. .1.= i the 100 /Cc te -flood plain should be dedicated to Lhe CiLy ills greanway . . _ . . ' _. • j , A 8ensitiVe Lands Permit will. be necessary for any cOnstructioh or ' gradihg within the flood plain, drainageways, or slopes over 25%. k Any reduction in the width of the City' s standard street, section i . .,c). - . . will roquire, thc, approval oF a variahce.,, - ...,., '..!'...., . fr )‘ .. ., /,,.-, 0TATt PrPO1 ..', 86 PAGC '2 ..-.. lt,14j..' r 7 0 , ♦ e ,•;'/ ' i Uui.idi.ny Inspection Division roues that, the slopes on many or the ft lots are steep . rrd that development and meeting sc_tbac;k , standards may k be difficult, The' Tigard School District and NPO #6 have ��'o objection: No other comments have been received. 8. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ' The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Pl n `. policies 2, .1, 3.1.1, 3.2,1 7.1.2, 7,3.1, 7.4.4, 13. 1.1 and 8. 1.3 and ."• Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18. 160, and 18. 164 . Since the Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, the Statewide Planning "•. , Goals and Gui.dellnes no longer need to be addressee, a•, The Planning staff concludes that the proposal with minor modifications n is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based '/' upon the findings noted below: . a, Policy 2. 1 .1 is satisfied becaus e the Neighborhood Planning ' (' 'z Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of ai the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's �.:. b .k0 proposal. b. Policy 3. 1. 1 will be satisfied provided that any portions o■` the, rN , Lots which exceel.,), 25% slope aria not graded or filled without a -. Sensitive Lands Permit. .1 c. Policy 3.2. 1 will be satisfied because development within the 100 r , = year flood plain will be avoided. If any of the proposed street "`d' .. does encroach h upon the flood plain, a Sensitive Lands Permit will .... q '0 d, Policy 7. 1 .2 can be met when additional information, nrjtd in the Engineering Division comments, is submitted and appropriate mitigation measures tak(,m, e. Policy 7.3 . 1 and 7:4.4 are satisfied because adequate water and b sewer Facilities are available to the development. The appl r: nt .,. � : also indicates that these facilities will be provided within the % CC subdivision as required by the City standards. : >1"' - Policy be met once the •termination .of Piverwrrod lane at F, Iaal y.c, !3. 1 . 1 will .� 92nt Avenue is justified or provisi,ons for future externsion to thee `n = 1 _ CD g , Policy 8 . 1, 3 will be sat.isf;ied when the coriditiow, ,r a,pprOv,ii_ ,,, : ,....1 rolating €rr street improvements are cr_lmpleted._ The Planning staff has determic°;,,d that -the proposal is consistent with c. _ ',he relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the c J earl i r,g y no L t d L)$ l 0L4J :.,. .l eIet r Ri.POI. - t )16 PAGf 3 -- - :- . ..t ..X 1, .c lei .. Y .., y w'.. a . " .I " , 6 . 410 411 o, ChopLur 18 ,50 of Int. Code is sAlsfied because the proposa meets . ' all or the r e equirements of the R-4 ,5 zon . ,.. — . 4 b. Chapter 18. 160 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets . . .. - . , • • the requirements set forth for the submission and approval of a preliminary plat, C. Chapter 18. 164 of the Code will be satisfked during the approval ..;:...,.. ..- ., . process for the final plat. • ' .• ..- - C. RECOMMENDATION 1*'....,:::',.....- % Based upon the findings, ane conclusions above, the Planning staff recommends approval of $ 1-86 subject to the following conditions: . ... ,. .... . .. 1 . UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL. CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO •„... •.. • : e.fit- 2... RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT. , ..... . . 2 Standard half-street and full street improvements including••----. -.;-. sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage --1.;.••-': • -. , and utilities (delete inapplicablq items) shall be installed along ' . - . • .. . the SW 92nd Avenue frontage. Said improvements along SW 92nd .4 . , .. . Avenue shall be built to (60 k'/W. 86' Pmt ) City standards . .".. ,,.. , including an 8 ft walk on the west side and conform to the , , alignment of existing improvements, (3 i. note the attached section 4 .. ,A. . which was approeed via Kneeland Estates subdivision development) , . •,-; - : . • a 3 . Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans including a site grading plan and cross sections and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered , ,..... - , Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be sUbmitted to the Engineering Section for -.. ........„. :‘ ,.., approval. ... . . , 4 Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profi,le details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans 4 „. ....,_..... - .. 5 Slope easements along SW Riverwood Lane shall be provided to the •.. - - - . • public, Documentation shall be on City forms or on the plat and ..e.,e,.. -4,••• approved by the Engineering Section, 6. the applicant shall provide a stomwatur runorf report addressing proposed onsite and offsite stormwater control and soil erosion control ,, (during and after construction); said report shall also - address the impat(t of upstream drainage racilities on the site and the mitigation of stortnwater damage to the downs lope City park & - ...II •••., vipac0 lands , - 7, ConstruGtion or proposed public improvements shall not commitnce ...3 - until alter the Engineering Section has issuell approved public improvement plans. The Sections will require posting of a 100% Performance bond, the payment of ii peruit fon and a sign ... . instailation/streelAight foci Also, tho pxotuiloo rif a ,, construction compliance greepont shall occur prior lo, rit - , ...:: - - copcurrently with the 1,s,, Ince of approved poblIt improiiement '. '.=, '. piano, ..SEE THE ENCLOSED hAN09.1)T GIVING MOREA1117..04,rie INrpRMArfoN REGARDINGFEE SCHEOUI_ES, BONDING AND AGREEOLNTS. !..;roll RI.PORT - 1 86 OAGE. 4 . . . . . 4/1111111MW1............m.... • .,. ... 41 0 . . ..,, . , B. A one (11 ) foot rosorew sirip ,Ari.anted to the "City or ligard" -., . . o shall be provided ckt the terminus of SW Riverwood Lane if it does -,..., .4. øt connect with the western section of Riverwood Lane. ,.. 6 9. If applicable, 4 temporary turn - --round shall be installed at the ...:-.... • . terminus of SW Riverwood Land; said turn-a-round to be approved by , the post office, fire department and Engineering Section, The . -- .',.. turn-a-round shall be it'emoved, if deemed, necessary by the city .'- - Engineer, at the applicants expense. A bond shall be posted with the City to assure future compliance, • :* „ . .L. • .. 10, Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public Rlong the .' . . SW 92nd Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet • ... from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be ..4 tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by . . Washington County. The dedication document shall be on City forms .. . and approved by the Engireering Section, DEDICATION FORMS AND ., iNSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED, .- t . • 11 . Double frontage lots, namely ? 7 and 8, shAll be restricted to ... .,.. ..,. access to only one public roadway :,- 12. Lot #16 shall only have direct access into SW River-wood Lane. 13 . The applicant shall provide a traffic report indicating measures to be applied to mitigate sight distance concerns, at the , . intersection of Riverwood Lane and 92nd Avenue, to the Engineering ',41 Section. ,... 14. The applicant shall dedicate lands within the 100 year floodplain .. .%, for greenWay purposes. 15, Street iLenterline Monumentation a. In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2), the 1! centerlines of all street and roadway rights-of--way shall, be ' monumented before the City shall accept a street thprovement, i ' . . 4 b, All centerline monuments shall be placed in a monument box conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument boxes shall be set at design finish grade of said street or roadway, . . ' c, The following centerline monuments shall, be set: 1) All centerline-centerline intersections . Intorsect. inw, - croated with "co4lector” or - other • . ,, existihti sLrooLl, - ,s'Iall be sot when the contLrline - ' _ i9Iignment of said "collectdr" or -other street has boeri ,4stab1ished by or fur the City: - . . , . 2) Center of all cul-de- s45,cs; 1, .. . , ,...„.,. . . ..:'. , 1 WiP(.)k I . 0 1 86 PAt :• ,, - , , - . • .,... ., .''' ,c. - - .+ '.,' t .1. . 4.4.... ,. ,.... • • ' '' ' •'.. 4, " ' ' '. 1.; . '" , ‘` : . ' k.' . .' Iii- • 7. gal . p 3) Curve pointl, points of i.nrtersection (P.1. ) when their position faits inside the limits uF Lhu pavement. a otherwise beginning and ending points (B.C. and E .C. ). ') All sanitary and storm location shall be placed in positions that do not interfere with centerline monumentation, 16. A Sensitive Lands Permit shall be required for any encroachment into the 100 year floodplain or construction in Orainageways or slopes over 25%. 17. Lot 12 shall, be subject to the setback and hoi,ght requirements for flag lots contained in Sections 18.96.090 and 18,98 of the Code. 18. A tree cutting permit shall be obtained ft-0m the City prior to • removing any trees over 6 inches in diameter, 19, After review and approval by the Planning Director and City • Engineer, the Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington County , 20. This approval is valid if exercised within o e year of the final decision date noted below. r P EPAR D BY: Keith Lid APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan Senior P1 ner Director of Planning Development • (l<SL:bs87) • • •« ... ......»..- ..». ..a ..., r...: .. - ... .. .. .. .. ' , • a mow« a. Uµk•,.., ` KNEELAND ESTATES I I I *. • o APPLICANT STATEMENT • MI Kneeland Estates III was given preliminary approval foe a subdivision in 1Y8A. The approval we 4' a combination of 22 attached and 5 .., detached single family lots. A final plat and construction plan were : .• 17 completed but the project was not completed becau.e of the change in economy. The present proposal is to subdivide the property into 18 single family lots. The present zoning is R 4-5. The proposed project mill comply with the reeuirements for this zone. The minimum lot size is 71,500 square fe,t. J • y The proposed subdivision but Kneeland Estates Na. 2 to the north. , This project will complete the cul-de-sac on SW 93rd Avenue. Copper • 3 Creek Stage 3 subdivision lies to the west of this property. The • roadway construction will complete Riverwood Lane out to S.W. 92nd Avenuem thus improving the traffic circulation for the area. I The property slopes- from north to south. Slopes up to 307e exist in the the northern portion of the it The southern one half of the , . o 1-6 property is within the 100 year flood plan and is proposed to be left . c in its natural state. Water is available in SW 92nd Avenue and SW Riverw12011 Lane. Sanitary sewer is available from a line running south through the project from Kneeland Estates 2. Storm -drainage will inclUde collecting drainage 1 S , A' , • i c • "- • frdm- the north as well as the site. The storm drainage will be i carried to the natural drai,ruage way running through the site. • • yi ry •.• , yf w µ � Y'1 • tl � . • :.... r ( 0 L . . S / _ -531‘,7- I xw L. ` : AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING r' y 7. STATE OF OREGON ) County el. Washington ) ens. City .of Tigard ) G'_ '�� I, (, � . , d 1 4./` .. ..�.� , being first duly sworn, on oath depose ,. . ': and sou. f / Please' Print) . ,+,.., That I am a I for /..-.. The City of , , Oregon. ...,, That I served notice of Public Hearing , for Tigard Planning Comic si,on. 4 of Which the. .attached is copy (Marked'E>chibit A) upon each of the following :.. named persons on the 2, day of 198 , by mailing to each of them at the address shown on t attached lila CHirked Exhibit B), ;: said notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United States Hail on the day of , 198.(0__, postage prepaid. . •' , r .ir .e`'^ ' ',AA t.,,.e.;;i,�r♦"ri .4-t,',., 'rQ}v.�..�j��' r.,a.' i.y7�a'l�\+�4 4 94 t.r+ k" Nylyia•+r• s " - • , y.i,,,r\,:' } \t` '+huh . .:,7,4;`lif ° - ..-4. i. Sig 'cure e rc Person who deli eyed to POCT OFFICE i Subscribed and swot to before tae on the ,..: . day of e ,, 19 O '�. ass ■ NOTARY PUBLIC F OREGON —.I g P Hy Commaaio�a E�tpurea - - ,}I_ x 4 (0257P) , 0 » r CY ‘n r 4e r r ," rr :: N O T I C E O F P U B L I C H E A R I N G . r Notice is hereby given that the Tigard Planning Commission, at its meeting on Tuesday, February �a. 186 _ at 7:30 P.M. , in the lecture ;; ' ya "- room of Fowler Junior High School, 1,0865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, will consider the following applications FILE NUMBER: S 1-86 . tlr APPLICANT: Lincoln Savings & Loan OWNER: Same 10250 SW Creenburg Rd. .. - ' Portland, OR 97223 i e. I REQUESTS minimum yl 8.68 acre aeft.into oreldroots, with a .:: f mni , q r property zoned ti . p �. .5 (Residential. 4.5 units/acre). Pi w LOCATION: Between Kneeland Estates and Cook Park, west Of Tigard High School (WCTM 2S1 14A lot 900) -• • A. io (See reap on reverse. side) The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the co .32 of . • � rules of Chapter 18 the Community Development Code and rules of .. 1 { procedure of the Planning Commission. Any persons having interest in this ' matter may attend and be heard, or testimony may be submitted in writing to be entered into the record of the initial hearing. _ i '„ y For k further information P 1pase contact the Planning De partment at 639-4171. 4 w TIGARD CITY 1275 5 S.W. yeah Avenue (Corner of Ash Avrenue b Burnham Street), or contact your Neighborhood Planning Organization (ALPO) # 6 Chairpersnn Phil Pasteris _.. Pion Phont Number 639-2342 'a' (pm/0257P) b .. _ .- '. a Sf i.3 �'U a p' •i . w ! \* ? � r ' 6. . 1 Ian' } r� �(({ 4 t � 7Y�i . t l 1 I } .rr,- { .1 . 1 -{ "Y 1 -.:" .{ 1,�. " ? . � ; I< i! • +/-/ ..,, \�PJ� I , I �, ' wf , It..,{�\ � ."f s� 1 \. 1i i. ..1 _.. r I y 1 16.7f--V-5 tip m • •' - „4 . • / I x.. ....,S .�,......,..-...�/..... ..r �,..1 nr•,-aHl'mbtll0 1 ,•r .v 9 1 �,,,�. >f ry r y tit aDOC r , , I S? 1 ti4. 1 �`t, ' r ..!"-.1 t..1` a ut) . I . , .. / �, V "tips`,i•a11• I � -,- ,--t n t ,rY• 1 Iti , ; • i. Ilk ' 1,.•'1if 1.� `••' 'j 4.11.1.L1.J « .� .,� ' '.t..,. j ( r 3 1 /y AI �1 e1 f.•s� �•t 7 r. 1. 1�„--.1'. 1 f i.,,',+•, •' �•�i�l,•(+('�1' .+«t1" 'lrl.;.. n,•r 1 ,. L.,,4.A.z1,.1.'1 =Mi... ,, ' (. 1 }t.. i a rA ,/r,x e ' 590 alit,-tj or it'46 Atb 'i+Q ( Rs I 1 S r 1 j .4I J..LI • "7j . ,�'*f""*" Pte! '1.. h ,,,{ , , �e a� • , 1 r `. {V'.1 1 L� ..7 1h � I i1 «I I ..L 1 I i 1 .r a , . •/f 1 7\l ;r. .I,sI,.., ( •;, _~.r..:j.�_` {1' 1 . • 'ca 1 '. 1 pia ,....7.-1 r � a � ii'1!!` 1 I 1-• /. ,1• , ..., 111... .. ,. .r , N t • � _ . ttlii* i : � 1 ; Il► '1 i . • T1 ., • *+' ..,•,..,.L ..... .... 1� \rte • ` ;+ If :7DARJWN... ... -_• _ j •'u90".9-�..1.`''! I iJJ I i .}.. —. 1 I 1 ' . ,,!.„.1 n / '''44 c..,,,k. v,i,:. .47 . \ . —x• i -7, .:.•. •• : ▪.4.' 4 4 i „.":1 )7/7,,, ,,,. '.%SISV 1 ., ,i Y '. 1 I. 1 1 1 _ 'N F i.ri' .♦•*l'.� I� / .. • ../..,...,..:,,,, K�':4•/�!� I I{I ••'•4* + ;Ct.' • (� T-C' ,` I • • 1 ill- ' Lt' I ' , r'' r«"y I. s-...J � ,a I •L - 5 \,,,,„'.---",:, , r4 a1 r L -1,, 1 r lJ ' 1 t t rr ((''77 lfm j j !' ' ' • ' •u�1--'.� L..,,_ LAI_ _.....ii . 1.11.1.1 ..l. Y »! �1 i I . ,......J L. !f t I. . -4. 1 1 L., —l""" I.. .4-. ir-- . - . , �. • ' - --.--I — f.-4 ....1 _,r AO C . 14 1 —,i, b �,... Cj V � � , 1L U 61A p` .M,� _ a � � MY - . .. f f, kat., ,., # rIGARD \ 't.;- µ r t_ : �+P i, ;'w r '.'.'.',.1• 1r�, ,1 1.' t ~•''i , uwRrCt . �,. �iid.4.l/. •Y..wi.yr,� ..ni,,.,r._.✓..,..Mq• -• FI V u*a �? ,.7. • ;4 ' l�'i- x'"�"J'1a 1 ' - , ,y • �;� :�1' ':. .. .1 • Y ®i Si r. \,.' ill 1 " ^` t•�* Wit:• ,, Y+,(, :!. K , 4 4 ki,I IL i J. 1 9.),), . , .1 , J ;, ," .F om•. •.I_ I a --...-«, .....,... /1 L ,. ..___� ...�.�.. .+ -. L 1�l -. _ ! : ,. 1 � r t li T,„„0 i - ' , * " 1 4..I I .1.4 ° •` 1=5 44 cook a . f 1`i •1 r 1 u I 1 t. ° �' (.... rf 1 0 • �i r I{ . 0 I 1l ,.- a i a , -C ' I / ` 0-A\"4,4 . i 1 "`/ X / r ,y• " ...✓ . 1� /*. , a y , I r ; s, a r a ..., it, a: ! _-. ", '. + a , • a :d av ' •1l,, \�« 0 t y„ - a r - Y `• dal ! , . . .. . , ,.... ,... . ., • ..... ... .. #.15 . ,.-, 3935 SW 1) mebrook St. ....„.. . .. .'i !,sirr.1 , OR 972214 INF 6( :,..... = • -.A, 0, " . ... •,. ..•:; :,.-- . . ..:. _: -,._ . . .. , Knf;a:14)nd Estate', III . ... .... :/ ' : 4,1, to, ' I tf33/6 °AO Pg61.1 .:. 't,Cfark Lincoln Savings and Loan i °ail P4Z6 MS S8S9L '' ' - ....i0, ..', ....;-.: '. Harold and Edith P.O. Box 23457 SI.J0Q Pup '$ siewoqi, , .. 7 . .,., ...,.. . 9410 S.W. Millen Drive Portland, Or , 1 upJad :',-,'-:-...'::: Tigard, Or 97224 97223 4 ! :......-',..1,;- ... ;. !/ .. , .- I .'.--L:' • . kciiIr' L#Pit''''' ...,, . . . .',Ir• f .. ‘• .74,7, T :L: .. , ;. ,.„.. .;., Custom Homes by Dave English • .. .:, „et. - •., Rt. 3, Box 253 Joan . . ,.• i • , -. ..:.. -! ,.. ..' Newberg, Or 16493 SW 93rd .... . - --.. - . - - - ' 97132 ' Tigard p Or 97223 . . JO . • , .:::.... ..:::: 1 IirEZL6 .. f 4100 A.4n;u03 ms gilogo ,, . . . ".'..: Kelsay Manning It 1 fito sy2Jew •,;. - - • . Clifford and Phyllis Patrick and Mary L. , :•-, ::.-.. ..-„,... 9580 SW Riverwood Lane 9560 SW Riverwood Lane 1 - ..: -,, .:,„... ,- • Tigard, Or 97223 TigardOr 97223 i - , OZZ46 JO 'Pjlicelii .:...: a )$.00 Jdc,03 KS 02G9T El VII 6V 0el , ,... .. Kelly Mount AUN OUV UAe -,....:. • • , Mark B. and G Al. no3 ail E. Guy III and Diana L. i ...,...,A -, - -:.-... .%.... ; 1 9520 SW Riverwood Lane 9500 SW RiverWOod Lane . ".:..-- ...:: Tigard, Or 97224 TigardtOr 97224 .... •,•, . .. i : OZZ46 JO 40-PPBT1 ., . ..4.,,,,,, .. : .. uelipoom.imATu ms Z0g6 : ,. .. - , •,- ,. . . .. .. . . ii0 ww 10 .... . . . Tualatin Development m OS mint HOM Inc . . 9 ti Auto Ou 2400M.i "7 ---: ,.' • .. -7 .7". . 1 . . 15300. SW 116th. Aviii. ciAo.a.10 16690. welonew64 Ct.,: : : i . \ ... ... tigard00r Lake 06W000, Or 9703e :-.- :::..... 97223 ...44,:-.A. : 2ZZL• 6 '' . JO P411145T1 ..,..--...,- .,-. Hem i,31-i3 ouuwa MS C26,4 .,.. , uAlt201#0 Pliw (IS Idituva ... .. ...- Baque Peterson •: . : Pred M. and Dana Lynn Terry and Barbara vallse.- - .-. . ..: . 16340 SW Cooper Crk Dr. 16520 SW Copper Crk De. . .. . ....,. . ... -. .. , .-..,... . Tigard, Or 97223 Tiotrd Cr 97223 ... ,,.,,.. ;.„.•::::„,t3,:i; . ! REEL6 JO Ti :. - .- P426 MS 0ZS9T . - KaMadA . Kirk 4 auT;eitsol puw sAwa ,.., ,-.. DAniti ken and Merle KennetN H. a. 9530 SW Millen Drive ' Et- 9510 SW MAllph Driva Vigkedi Or 97224 Tigard ai- 97224 co ... - . 66 J 'Iluitt4,40t1 .. :,., nma 913 ou2to ' . 11...:.. .,. 1 . .. Wi 1 wl Doug a 11.b24qOU pUYI uw4dwqg al I '' ca 4 • - _., ... .. .-. Loren and Connie John Cid. Marilyn - .. . . SW . . - .. -, ILIA 16500 SW 93rd Aveh . 10180 SW LettUrb1 - - TioardoOr 97224 tiaivdeitOrt p Or 97000 . , . it8Z44,6 JO. PaileaTi '.. aAPaAtattIW .m8 00,6 tolt.itotd Puto P LidalsoP - Tigard School D .. .. ..,......„.......„,... • .. . .. , •-,. .."- '„"H . istrict 23J - 13137 SW Pacific Hwy- - - tigti ed Ora 97224- ,. ,.,.. . . , , . . .. • •. . . ' . .. . . . . . , . . , . . :..' ,:'.2'...: '_i.—:-Tii1:::-.':;,;•.,,,,,,1:'•i','"7-7-7"—..""":''21; ..,':.;:' i-::——.,',y;.•1:;'.7"..7-"T',"-'"'-,:.;;±''''':'''----;::-T":.."' % .'O.;. 4.,1';‘,i',,!_' .''J,'., "'..,_• '`':: '''' ' : '44'i'; :_4%,,,. 'r", • ':"-:,....'!, 7.''' ' '. '.., . Li••• ,k '‘.7.'14..'!i,, V .- .... - / - -ai ,„ 41, .. , ..... . . kt , ,., CITY OF TIGARD OREGON ......4.---..........L............................ .I.,...1% '. 2,: ... COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 1) N-. . . 111 AGENDit OF; April 14, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: • — C:/............... . . . . DATE SUBMITTED: flpril 9 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission • .:., -4 . ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE S 1-86 Approval on February 25, 1986 . - - . .,.. • . , . . v Kneeland Estates II • PREPARED BY: •••••••••■•MA• ••••••••••••Keith L.i d e n • ••■••••■••••••*i.../ '''' 0■••••■••••••Ma•e....***8••••*••••••••••••■, ; 4 . . .. • . . . .11......,........................................kor ..................*■ REQUESTED BY'. I. o , A'. DEPARTMENT HEAD OK.: ..1 24) CITY ADMINISTRATOR: .*.). - - • , . .• POLICY ISSUE -,.. .'. ... INFORMATION SUMMARY ... -.... '..: , a • y , On March 10, 1986, NPO g6 appealed the Planning Commission decision to approve „.„ S 1-86. On the same date, Council waived the fee requirement for NPO #6. A ". . ..' . hearing based upon the record must occur before the Council. Cbpies WO #6 -. appeal letter; a letter from the Audubon Society; Planning Commission Final ,. ., Order, Transcript and minutes from the February 4 1986 hearing; Petition and - .. ,, letters submitted at the hearing; list of speakers; staff report; and . affidavit of mailing with notice of public hearing, site plan, mailing list . and memo from Randy Wooley, City Engineer are attached, On 3/28/86 Randy Wooley and Keith Liden met with Mike Houck (Audubon Society), Dana Seigfried (Army Corps of Engineers), and Norm Harker (Alpha Engiheel-ing) • - at the site, Mr. Houck and Ms, 3iegfried agreed to formally submit comments ..- .. ., • by the 14th. . ,..•. ',. .•■•••••.......r....*. oe..........o......aoi.oi...................■ Iga........ 174 v' -.- ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1111 •\v IMMIN .! OC 1. Uphold the Commission decision. ..,y a %). a, Reverse the Commission decision, / • ....i 3. Modify the Commission decision. 03 ,i4 R.Amand the issue back to the Commission for further nsideration. ....1 t, )• - . 7 , . SUCGP.:STED ACTION _....._ e,c, ,„,k) r RevieW the record and make a decision as appropriate. , , . . •4 A , i (1 4 (2447P) • . . • , , , h . t . •w 1. 1 '..., ":-. 4, 0 IP , MEMORANDUM ctTY OF TIGARD, OREGON :; .` 1 , 4-....k - r TO Members of City Council. April 3, 1906 FROM Rzndy Wooley, City Engineerillr- . r:h , :"., SUBJECT Proposed Plat of Kneeland Estates III In discussions regarding the proposed pat of Kneeland Estates III, several 1 cancerne have been raised regarding traffic and streets, deed on try research ti', .,Y of raPO , I have the �•� , and on discu�� snns at the April 2, ,�"gR� meeting following coa nts t r •. • 1. There is aA,a great deal of concern about vehicles traveling at 41a ceisivae ,1 , speed; on St 9/nd Avenue between the High School and Cook Park. This A; yr r ... . is apparently an existing problem, not related to the: subdivision. It R . r-a ppears to that this is a traffic engineers " problem ' should address this summer as a City problem, '; ther than as a '' t " subdivision condition, �,r 2 eat of concern about through traffic on neighborhood There is a great d ',/ '-'"� streets. Of special concern is the Comprehensive plan designation of e , Riverwood Lane as a minor collector connection between V 92nd Avenue (' and tW iG th Avenue kw" b ' ; , I feel that.t it is a�- valid concern. therefore, I recommend review of i; . hip! a Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map forpossible (• .:' ,, : Weendieent. The review needs to be initiated promptly, as several developments are contemplated in the area ie the near facture. .,' 0. i i There s m quest whether Rivee°wQOd Lane should be e btt 'ded east of fi'l SW 92nd. Review shows that such an extension would require substantial I ;� fill in the floodpl'.ire and wetlands arena. A bettee locution for an .� ,' eastward access road appears to be approximately 3 feat north of �� G W p l. X recommend that Riveo od Lane s Horeb o�dte�ndeda�eastward S ,®' 2 h a Avenue; 4. The nonce° , �� pt of constructing R �erwood Lane as a narrower—than—standard ': ti �i street was discuss o d06 did not ,ta rpor t the iii Z Ti@a fc e; 1 commend that Rivera ocd L��ane in Kneeland Estate* II red. P he exiting RiverWood adjoining� g�aed as the same Width as t in the see i +�h ado , '. '. subdivision (approxim atelV 34 feet) `gem i Al Ps. ''' . - L ,.,„; -,- , . . . i ., .„..-E , , ,i4, . . a ,' •ro h fi_.: - -......... ... !_h'.`F. �.�+W•x ill Ln.. „ - ."2 ,.,, ..'.:- r' ,. �'.. ..'. ,� .. .w;..: ... .�-al.d•- N:. .c ,1w '''_. •Yi '�' -.. ,`,_.. J.. .„-4,. r. � '.' r .- ,v' , . Aill, 410 . , .1):: : 4. . Mew to Council April 3, 1986 • -'' Page 2 . _ 5, There was concern that adequate sight disat ncca be provided on SW 92nd Avenue for safe taffic operations. A traffic study was suggested to na address this concern. I feel that we can achieve better results by u .= specifying certain design criteria. Therefore,fore, I recommend that ,..,;: Planning g Commission Condition No. 12 be amended to read +s follows: - 12. The public improvement plans for SW 92nd . Avenue shall t-. provide a minimum st?upping sight distance of 300 feet ,' ....- ' i = .- along SW 92nd Avenue and a minimum intersection sight distance of 350 feet for vehicles entering from giverw ood Lane. d These criteria are based on national standards developed by the American ft . Association of State Highest end Transportation Officials (AASHTTO). The • ' AASHTO standards are somewhat conservative, therab l providing.. for the a fact that some vehicles will ekceed the design speed of 35 MPH (the current speed limit). These requirements are greater than what we would usually require on a miner collector such as SW 92nd • w: 6. There was a request for additional traffic studies to dearmz,ne existing { traffic volumes and traffic s ae,. . s on Vol 92nd Avenue. Such studies addressing existing traffic concerns on 92nd :. .. would be useful in • Avenue, but would probably not help + much in deciding how to design • IPIp tr er volume/speed Kneeland Estates ITT. Therefore, I would questions whether :- - studies should be a condition of subdivision approval. m Z, . • p�j{a.A_ yr /j �y u Y+ ra (UUW:by /2436P) 1. ,4 AAi ta :41 ais •r H e. d� y 1 "yy ' T. q..; ?' • ". !• f ♦ii h f err yy . y , • t i d 1 , • m „ ' — / L4-4....1,LILOW ,L..)-IL) -6 c 4., jib c, . ... . ... '.:-. I March 10, 1986 (..ipy 3'4 sopon • . - .r- • - . it 41Z,1"..-,d C • .. .... • Notice of Appea1 ) t. . Colk if a Tkt S ''''' • 4, . . * ■ , . .. .. . W . 3--/o- . irec, Planning Commission Case Number: 5 1-86 . •:... .... ., .,...:., .... ., . Appealing Party: Neighborhood Planning Organization *6 , a, i . 1 i i ,, ,, .. •... •-• ...: MPo t7 rtflas Its, & po.rty ilk .1-4A tugger siiitit. 4.4e. eropotea Sae ts locortecl a vt tury v . .. Final Decision Date March 10, 1986 (P,30pe ‘ FC;A( beso ect O : 2/7-51634 "..'.. , ..•'-' I The Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) is appealing Planning „.„...... .. " , , ' . Commission Case Number S 1-86, addressed at the February 4, 1986 e, •,e '.. .. •.„.,;,. • . Planning Commission meeting. The NPO requests case number S 1-86 be ..-• e ',, .., ... -... ,e, remanded back to 4 , citing the following provisions for this action under section 18.32.370 of the development code: -fft% See. pase 2 , .. , . . .: . ..., I. Due to the timing of the Planning Commission public notice, the - - • . • .... landowners were not able to meet with the NPO and voice their ,, . .. concerns. Meetings held after the Planning Commission decision with .. „*.,....., .-... .. the neighborhood and NPO chairman have resulted in very constructive , •.. . . involvement regarding development of the proposed land. The NPO did not have the required input to make an informed decision regarding this . .. development, thus the.request for denial at the Planning Commision .... ..e. - - ,....,,,.. ,....,.,...I meeting. - ., .... . ... , , . • . 2. Research conducted by residents of the neighborhood has produced evidence of the unique physecal character of the land not available at . . . .. . . the time of the Planning COlfifili881011 meeting. The evidence is the result of a preliminary examination of the proposed site by Mr. Mike Houck, Urban Naturalist of the A idubon Socieiy, Mr. Houck has deter- mined that several lots are clearly within existing wetlands and ..t . :..:, .,... should not be built on t.see attached letter). ".^ tz • , ,.... 3, Several other to_pics were inadequatevy addressed at both the NO and ... Planning Cornmivsion meetings. These include: .. - co •,:. ..,„ _ . a. The character of th.e proposed neighborhood is not in character _ With adjoitting CoOpertreele and Kneeland states-dPvelopMents - - - A more appor-opriate layout M the lots to be consistent With the ,. . shape and charter of the lots of the adi3cent develooro€ntT l 1.. should be considered. ''' • . .,,'ir' '' b. TranmOrtation issues such 8s: . . _ . . - - . . 1 As .- pr in the st 5f f. reDort the ihtersection of r.:itr'fi: v-r* " . -, ' 4 .;.•- .. .. „.- :. ... I . . , -. . .. ..,.. ,/ Aupe,a1 illik6 '? 1 wo 0 Pay - , • t... , .3, . 1 Notice of ., :..,.. 2:::, , - .• - ,.. .- • '‘• .• .,,, .. • . ,. Lane and 92nd Avenue will require a traffic study addressing . .e• . .. .. - .• sight distance concerns, The neighborhood agrees with this -.. . . . request but is concerned with the lack of a specific time at m: which ., ' use; r which the study mal be conducted (winter, low use, summer, . fi, high use; weekday or weekend; day or night). Also, no -- , • specific direction is given to the pedestrian aspects of the • study. . ,-. .. . .. .,. ... *.., 2, The character and volume of the increased traffic from Tigard High School and Cook Park on Riverwood Lane through the Picks Landing, Kneeland Estates and Copper Creek resideritial areas ., ,, . ,..„ .. . .. .• .. . was not adequately addressed. ,-t..... '-'• , ..,, • 3. No specific proposal was made to address the problem of '. private driveways on lots 17 and 18 which may be directly • ••,•I ,,,,•.,•, :0 .' . I • I , . .. across from Riverwood Lane and intersect with 92nd Avenue. .: . . . ..,,.... . „ . 4. Parking problems arise when events are held at Cook Park .., . ...• .,,,, ,.. .. - . . during the summer. Insufficient parking space a the park ....'-',.Nie,,... forces park visitors to park along 92nd Avenue as far away as . ....-.4, Tigard High School. This overflow parking would be diverted to • , Riverwood Lane. .. .A .: 4e.- .•1," ,• ., 4 r • •• The NPO as a city recognized representative of the neighborhood requests •, ... .. ... .„:„.: waiver of the appeal fees. .`• ..., . . . e . . Respectfully submitted, ;'). .‘ came . — — '.. • t i •• Phil Pasrs, Chairman tei Chi NPO st 6 . . _ - '• p 4 MP, '. . • 1' ILI .. _ - . _ _ ? , , ctittliiiiA Movit5 t t S ' — - . c( P YO (9 coA ' 1 , . t - - - . ...; :-. .,...° • ?.4r ... ,, '' pudub'\ „It\ 0 A 0 d, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND , R I o j 900,, 4 Na A Branch of ,Vatia.oaf Audabntt .ttwietl Orator PHONE 292.6655 • S 1 S 1 NORTHWEST CORNELL ROAD •,•u Pb‘'IL AND OREGON 97 21 p 4 March,, 3, 1986 City of Tigard - -,, Planning epartme nt . . P. C. Box 23397 ,.. ,;. j.0 Tigard,. Oregon 9' 223 .:.1 .:” .4 Re:Kneeland Estates, Number 3 s I visited the site recently at the request of a local landowner 3„ + fi and wanted to let you know I have some specific concerns about the placement of lots in obvious wetlands. - I. Lots: 3, 2, 1, 17 and 18 are all clearly within existing wetlands and Should not be built on. If the developer does go ahead with to develop `these lots it is my opinion that 404 permit would be required and you should notify the applicant that this. is the case. e J - r As I have no additional information at this time I will await more information from �..,- you about the status of this project , , • 0 Sincerely, '» '` Mike rLiouck r: cc Jack Broome, Wetlands Conservancy '' r y Gene Herb, ODFW Brian•an LIghtca °, U. S. Army Corps Joe Pesek, ODFW . r . ' 'to, — a .. yam, tl1• 4 ' , R X2.5 F p r r _I r %} q,f t.•e l / e '147P '01,111.41(10/an aQ o asr), su Peo. ( A' � roacian wo ( Wj �. VL/T-' 4uva7 DO1,I vj 14 0710‘, 1117 livc 02,w Pi777 Qd4t 74-11 .1.(1 C5r) US/19 sg; a 0 4? 47ON 2h el"? W,L7 ?W ditli SUO aiitroxic� I/ 7,11i / 6A:3'1 InArt 1,1,12 �✓l�US X70 7't " o*. a 7tfltd' 7 ) Sy pica 7UJ1PV11 • 2 n pr,!04 ) t b% Ao4N ... .tvAro:po,N : . 14 '1• 1Y-0‘,1 /1+:rro7 ovrpivbfke. Skelc dv d01 f7t4Q Teti' p?5,07Azti .� + but d � t. GrJ �a ? l� ;f4.. - _ ... ...: * it,' \ • r eP , rR• • , . ., i 97 ) ( Z - - '? .,,� f�'5Y •C. .) / 11,4.....4:•,r:' .rr.d•'` P ''"' 'it.„,r ' ` . II, � P i A,1,14.t,v;p1C qk:, 41 4,Nos-Ja- -., ,,. '"' 4 p ti. ° t,i '-sv. ); cJ Li 96;4.6 •`44.,) («w t li.t#1.4,..) ..17t-t(' '•& 91‘i d ,t'#. 0 9 5(,,,0 .5.4:9 4:',4:4,"t LiAd-c 6 c(.. I,tt . .•'. . :...1- :: ...',. ?5,,,.... ,,,.. , - -% — (r,./ . : .' 7.-N..., ,)'I:. e I,tit, a , ,,, ,,,,,J,-(,,, ' 7° L.Ati,), 7ft_,:z.#/e,ii (1-607 ...v, 1/4:/ ' ' : .. .,,.- .. )‘...': I i . 47 y•! Ai,1 'I .. 10.4,' t /Tti' 'lelv 1 . 'A:''"-• ' ., it. .1,4.* /65 ) staJci..140-) . ., r r l 6 de . , , ' .e..z. ','/>of, ' _1 ei,.. la P'o,t;444:/e' e.--. , . , -- ,: - ;if, $ . / 11 I ..0%.464‘...... 1 i it, ..v.. ieiv„:::.-4:(41411,. i",/, - Wp , .,. - , is).*) !. I ' ' '? /b 411f2:15/.4) (le,104/,:Cee c4t ' ' ..- .. - - (1-'4 ; ri ,, „4„,e.lzt /6-6r:;#?(, -..P't.s..) r-4,21.,-rei?e/L... cx.., ....,( . .... .' } 1 •.; • ; ,,.• ti t......-17 0 .. t "' .' '(a1, 4..t. 1 /6 t.-L.r 6.t.... .4. ..t b4, ' .„„ . , c-71- / i,')f' - r' +'' yys� e , Y` `s ' P N f 0 1 i i . 4 u ! ; x ii r p' ,,ppi�pp �, 1{ -Vii) •• a ��. , a •e� - 0.SO.it t ~ , 4. i r J »'r. . r• ., "' '!r. I. .,„r2ii : �,r".- ;a r„J, , , � 4 ; +:ni :r I,w .M , Q 1,, C . � y pr ' ' '. : ', / Oill • CITY OF TIGARD 0. Washington County, Oregon . .1 . E _- ' NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER ,•- BY PLANNING COMMISSION .-'' •; 1. Concerning Coe Numbers) S 1-•86 . t' 2. Name of Owner: Lincoln_ Savings & Loam . 3. Name of Applicant: Same address [0250 SW` Greenb+ r„ ; Rd. r City Portland State OR Zip 97223 ' 4. Location of Property: .e,-.4 __ of r between_.__n aid Cook Park Address West cr 92nd Ave.Av+e. b ween Kneeland Estates I a',�.�. -— ' Tax Map and Lot No(s).. (2SI I4A lot 900) 8. , 5 Nature of Application:n Request to divide 8.68 acres into 18 lots with a minimum ,: .• size of 7,500 sq. ft. •6. Action Approval as requested :� ••4 .:® .Wig Approval with conditions :::- Denial . . ' .,-. 1 °' ` 7. Notices Notice wan •published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and " mailed to 0,-, , Xx The applicant /'i owners XX O nerf of record within the required distance " . X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization KX Affected governmental agencies , _.. y yr ' 8. Final .... Decision: MM., �e00/14 N THE DECISION , MALL BE FINAL ON �March 1086 UNLESS AB APPEAL IS FILED. ~. adopted i . 8 fact, decision, t . nt condition can be bt,inei f c m the ?l nnkrg Departm nt, Tigard city 8all 12755 SW Ash, • IoO® fox 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9 41; .. Any patty-to Sec• i r loo� appeal -this decision in accordance 'with a ` - 18.32.200 A ande decision- may t o1 3 .370 Which w i18 be filed rat provides that a written appeal. .4 •: gal _ .� r _. ,� , .. y b, �� 1 �� '•:.k•�dt`�; after notice is given and sent. - - • ,, The d • ef ' �r �.'41- , sn appeal Ra , 1986 M The tadli o f r s rch 10 4.30,P - • 4444444441.44114414144.4.4414440.4.40144 .; • . 10. g estio�s: if you have any questions, please cal): the City of Tigard Planning Department , 639-4l71 r 4,- .w. a .. - M . • (0257P) d. r r „ ,, . i, `• . ', 4 4' ,. • w.. ; .:.:. dl, h1.; .N ;,. •, , !.." ri4`.,1 :�:,.,•,,.,. ,.... .�.-q .. N Y . y 1 „ t'j a ro 3. (a • 4?) ti CITY OF TIGhRD PLANNING COMMISSION 14' FINAL ORDER NO. 867PC A FINAL ORDER INCLODING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, WHICH APPROVES AN — APPLICATION FOR A SUBDIVISION (S 1-86) REQUESTED BY LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN C The Tigard Planning Commission reviewed the above application at a public . ' h, �"' hearin on February A, 1986. The Commission based its decision on thy. facts, . findings, and ce clusions noted below: A. FACTS w ' 1. General Information , CASE:. Subdivision, S 1._86 REQUEST: To divide 8.68 acres into 18 lots with a minimum size of 7,500 .• ^r square feet. i COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residenti' l ZONING DESIGNATION: R-45 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre) APPLICANT: Lincoln Savings and Loan OWNER: SAME ., 10250 SW Greenburg Road Portland, OR 07225 •. 111 ( LOCATION: West of 92nd Avenue between Kneeland Estates No II and Cook Park (, . .• .`d1 i 2. ®9 ou d „ ; Prelir Preliminary plat approval was granted an 1981 (S 11-80/CPR 12-81) for 22 i t ` -attached and 5 detached single family residential lots. The final plat --. i1 a. w K �; was never recorded and the apps val has expired. 1 ,►,ty Infor°ott ic+n Kneeland estates No. 2 lies to the north and Tigard High School is \\ ' ' northeast on the opposite side of 92nd Avenue. The V1-4:5 zone applies to r this area, The Copper Creek development which is zoned R-7 (PD) ResiOential, 7 r�rits/acre, planned development lies immediately e t and • 4i Cook Park a guts the southern boundary of the property y CO 4. Site Information 1 —.172 property s presently undeveloped: Th€ terrain slopes-downu ra from u� site. t"fh�ousou kern half s of the t r^o. ew�t._ ,�i�� within the r^t�en of .thi � _ . - north g up 30% in the, northern or .. i a P y 100 year flood plain, --R ` r 1 .ae t c - _ .4 1 c #0,,,,,'q o r Tr., . t •'47: E; FINAL ORDER No 86--02PC PAGE ' •, rA'. .1. ',• -.'..tiw ' Y ,•._1. •+,s1 F n - - .i2,i' M. . -. _. .. illw i 2., .f . *.1. , r 4 v+ R _- _ j •'' .• 40 40 • � '� N - '. •�° The applicant proposes to d ivide the property into 18 single family < residential lots, all with .a minimum size of 7,500 square feet. '° Riverwood Lane wi a be ( xtended from its terminus at Copper Creek to � .. • 92nd Avenue. In addition to Riverwood Lane, four lots will haav , frontage on the 93rd hvenue cul-de-sac in Kneeland Estates No. U. Although this proposal represents a reduction in the number of lots from 27 to 18, the subdivision layout and street ,alignment are very similar a ` to the proposal that was approved in 1981. • 5 A ecl�cy and NpO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments a+. Lots 17 and 10 on the east side of 92nd Avernus; will preclude the extension of Riverwood Lane to the east. The applicant should be ::' able to show that other reasonable alternatives exist for a r°oas .di access to the .• : • . , P' ng property to the east. b .. The issue of stormwater runoff presents several problems which . " , must be clarified. Stormwater through "Tract A°' from the school :" ' property and 92nd Avenue needs to be addressed along with the g A , drainage over Lot R in . gully through Lots. 10, �.l, And 12 and the draan s, - the event of a catch basin failure on the 93rd Averwe .;:•gab-de-sac. n e t t. I a1 c. A private pond is locate above Lot 12. Liability for any flooding caused by the pond and the right of this owner to release er water' onto Lot 12 is unknown. , d d, Slope easements along Rinrerwood Lane will he necessary, R �e. If Riveraood Lane does not connect with the completed portion in n Copper Creek, a teve orary turn around will be necessary, - '-',.\(..."•• - A. f, Lots 7 a hd 0 have double frontage and access should be limited to -m one street, The access for Lot 1.6 shall be limited to Riverwood . ' - Lane g. report is needed indicating taken to mitigate the site distance limitations at the . r be A traffic repaati what measures should sbe p oa Pivorwood Lane/92nd Avenu i intersection P h, Tae applica�a ,t must provide storm+aaater runoff report addressing 1, .._i rafter construction. This report mus- erosion con�o^�,��. d��ri and ;, proposed on and off site sto iwater and po t address the 1p,tipact of >•• a upstream drainage facilities and the mitigation of adverse . storamwater impacts upon City Park and green way :.rear - i. - re 100 year floc ' plain should be de�dicated:� .i o the City as LU , The lu 9 enway, p . Y x Lands i y a n y construction on a an 6, d� n+�rar�it w�.11 be necessary� fo grading within the flood plain, draainageways, or slopes Over 25%; k Faction in the width of 'the. City y y s standard str•r et sest; n . _ will require thnn aPprove,1 of a variance. j 1.11t, .' ' FINAL ORDER No, 8 -02PC - PAGL 2 ! ,...w • . Fes: •.:.. iy .... , .,.,y, ,a L d,.,,.s r'. W ..° , u. r .k... _ i M'0k i1 N',_ .' •, . ,s - CIF -., - ,.. .- •A...-----________ .1, , 4, 4I0 .. , - f ,r ,• The Building Inspection Division notes that the slopes on many of the • lots aril steep and that development and meeting setbacks standards moy be difficult, ‘ ` The Tigard School. District and NPO #6 have no objection, •• No other comments have bean received. '° " S. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Coeprehensive Plan Policies 2,1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.1, 7. 1.2. 7.3.1, acrd Y�.1S4. Since ,,.. ti. 8.1,1, &d S.1.3 and Community Develcpment Code Chapters 10,50, 10.160, the Comprehensive R , r+ has been acknowledged, the Statewide Planning " • .. Goals and Guidelines no loaner need to be addressed. ": __,M The Planning Commission concludes that the proposal with minor a w modifications is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the iindings noted below • . a. Policy ?°..1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning V; nizat` an and surrounding property owners were given natice of ♦ Jam_ ti:a hel�ri.n: and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's s e ` proposal. r 9 b. Po l icy 3.1.1 wi l l be sat i sf ied provided that any portions Lots which exceed 2F4. dope are not graded or filled With ut a ;`: Sensiti ee Lands Permit �. — ( d % c. y 2.1 will be satisfied because d�r;elopment within the 100 Policy 3. . year flood plain will be avoided. If any of the proposed street does encroach upon the flood plain, a Sensitive Lands Permit will i • .k iii.�. be required . • d Policy 7. 1 2 can s be n met comments,ents additional is sr,�bmittrmatiaand noted ire the. �. � . Engineering Division io m� n ., mitigation measures taken. • " 1 € nd 7 4 4 are satisfied because adequate water e. Policy 7. � ;, fair artd sewer facilities are available to the develorment. The applicant le w also indicates that these facilities will .t R+ provided within the • vubdivi:si;on as required by the Citli standards � Fl P VW . f Policy 3.1,1 will b4 mat once the termination of R aiarweod Lane . t Pal , ., t 92nd Avenue i�a �ustift d or provisions for future extension to the r east are made: l.Y. y-, W ..- " ci. Policy 0 will be satisfied when the conditions of. approval . ,, . is relating to street improvements are completed. . Planning Commission has determine the proposal. consistent h the relevant `p portions of the Coms+urit that DeVel met Code based . �� with � po y p ed Upon the findings noted below, ) . , o i - . „ _ ' - - FINAL ORDER NO 86-02PC M PAGE 3 �I . '" F .Y,n: .. yy '• .1 .. . >"a. m.� .: �y der, i . s r ° ^• „,°a ••� +, .P- - - _ , - .a r it •' i i .�r.... .CJ ' .a.. '' - 1 . ... ....i.- , • • 410 , a, Chapter 18.50 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal mepts ( , . all of the requirements of the R-4 .5 zone. : " b. Chapter 18, 160 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets . . •. . .. the requirements set forth for Cie submission and approval of a . . Prelimitdary plat.• • "'‘. ,..'" ; C. Chapter 18.164 of the Code will 6e satisfied during the approval . .,:,,,., 0. . process for the final plat. .., .. . C. DECISION . .. .,.. ., Based upon the findings, and conclusions above, the Planning Commission approves of S 1-b6 subject to the followinu conditions: ..:...,,A, . . . • -, ••., 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTE ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO . .. RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT. . . 2. Standard half-,street and full street improvements including sidewalks, c..,rbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage and utilities (delete inapplicable items) shall be installed along . the SW 92nd Avenqe Frontage. Said improvements along SW 02nd ' •' - 1,. A' enue shall be built tO (60' R/W, 36' Pvmt.) City standards '. ,,.. including an e ft walk on the west side and conform to the alignment of existing improvements. (* note the attached section . . e41 . . which was approeed via Kneeland Estates subdivision development). • .. . . • 10,• • - • . , 3. Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement 'constrcction • • ( plans including a site grading plan and cross sections and one (1) - ...,• \. itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professiotal Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed publiq , , improvements shall 6e submitted to the Engineering Section for ... . , . , ., . . . approval. 4. Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profile details shall be proVided as part of the public improvement plans. , . 5, Slope easements • lotg SW Riverwood Lane shall be provided to the public. Documentation shall be on City forms or on the plat and approved by the Engineering Section. , 6, The applieant shall provide a stormwater runoff report addressing , 06 proposed onsite and offsite stormwater contrel and soil erosion ' - contrel (during and after cenetruction), said report shall also - . OD ›- address the impact of Upstream drainage facilities on the site and • t: the mitigation of stormwater demage to the downslope City ?ark & . , OD . bpen space lands. ., _ _ - ... . - . 4 Lu - 7 Construction of proposed public improvements shall ecot ciimmence ' - _ until after the Engineering Section ha isetTed apprleved public • , , improvement plans, The Sections will require postit4 of a 100% - • Performance bond, the pt.lyment of a permit fee atld a sign installation/stree jh fee. Also, the execut.kon of a . i 1 , constrectlon complian. agreement shall occur prier te. or - ' ..concurrently with the issuance- of approved "OUWele iMPriAlemnt plans: SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE oEctric INFT4MATION _ . . ., ' • REGARDING FEE SCHEDiALES BMOING ANO AGREEMENTS ,. . ' 'e '. FINAL ORDER NO 86-020c PAGE 4 ',dr' ,71 .2 I 8 SW Riverwood Lane will connect with Riverwood lane in the ''•.. . . „, , : . - --,..- . .. , 410 40 -' ' development to the west (Copper Creek) . 1-. -..... ( ' ,p,,, , 9, Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the ,•, SW 92nd Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet • ' g 1 ' from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be .. °4 -.•' tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by ..: 4-. Washington County. The dedication document shall be on City forms .'' approved by the t rg ineering Section. DEDICATION FORMS AND -y., INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED. 10. Double frontage lots, namely # 7 and 3 shall both be restricted .: "e• to only one access each on the same public roadway 11. Lot #16 shall only have direct access onto SW R ver rood Lane. 12. The applicant shall provide a teaffic report '.dig aating measures M to be applied to ritigate sight distrncr concerns, at the `: ,. iAtersection of Riverwood Lane an rt!fnd Avenue. to the Engineering and a Section. The Riverwood Line easterly access shall be addressed in �:. conjunction with this study and Lots 17 and 18 shall be platted ` and Tract "A" shall be dedicated to the City once the traffic • v,? ..., study has been reviewed and approved by the Engineering (Division. r 13. The applicant shl1 dedicate lands within the 10 year floodplain and the property south of the road not platted into Lots 1 b 2, and - 3 for greenway purposes • b PA. Street Centerline tionumentation a. In accordance with ORS 92.0e" ' �- . `.. ,,, .� �� subsection (2),, the u ,� L,. 'centerlines of all street and roadway rights-of-way shall be r. ,..Y aaureent, d before the pity shall accept a street improvement. n o :' • , M d b. All ceni.arline monuments shall be placed in a monument box ,. confor tng to aiity standards, and the top of all monument boxes shaill be set at design finish grade of said street or . , rsr)adway k . ' c, The 'col lowing centerline i re monuments shall be set, :: o6 1 Ali cents rline-centerUne intersections other 4. t Intersections 1GY^ea't�ld �Sllth "collector" Or tt sting- streets, shall be set when the centerline alignment of said "collector" or other street has been i•. established by or for the City: - - - 2) Center of all cu l•-de--ssacs a s - ) . XNAL ORO R NO. 86-02PC PAGE 4 - -4- : L r 3 C - - . .. i. .___I +' �� , ;'�. •', s. .. •' .K '"2xY pis ' „ ` °s . is 'It -..... . - - . . . • . e.. , i le •il) .. . ,.. 4 3) Curve points, points .--.0f intersection (P I. ) when their position falls inside the limits of the pavement otherwise beginning and ending points (B.C. and E:C, 4) All sanitary and storm location shall be placed in a':' positions that interfere with centerline monumentation. : •�, 15. A Sins(ttive Lands Permit shall be required for any encroachment ,5•• into the 100 year fl rldplain or construction in drainageways or .`" slopes o<<er 25%. 4 . 16. Lot 12 shall be subject to the setback and height requirements for ti tiolg '.ots contained in Sections 16.96.090 and 16.98 of the Code. . 17. A tree cutting permit shall be obtained from the City prir.,r to - " : removing any trees over 6 incha, ,s in diaa.4ter. ,'' 16. After rovi w and approval by the Planning Director and City . Lnginegr, the Final Platt shall be recorded with Washington County. „• 19. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final 'd. • ' •' decision date noted below. . It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this ' order. ►.4 , :: c l PASSED: This day of .a.... 1g6y the 13e �;a�nr��:r .. Commission of the City of Tigard. '" i JJJ A. Donald Moen, President �' °• Tigard Planning Commission • (KSLtbs87 / •. P - w . ■ r Wi - '.. w y a } r • iI�:* FINAL 000ER NO. 66-o2PC PACt 6 Y , ,_ .. • " JJ 1.4 , __sense__ _ ,.,.' Z 0 T ., TRANSCRIPT -. Irlt.::•;'.2„11.',.:**1* 4 -.., TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION - February 4, 1986 ',,;:',.. • - -,,,, ,-.., ; ... '"' ITEM 5. 1 - LINCOLN SAVING & LOAN (S 1-86) ', -7, ...,-'' .,•, .. ___ _ .: :, '..... , '.4. ''e.t■4'' COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: President Moen; Commissioner Butler, Peterson, 4 .. l=„ WS Bergmann, Newman, and Leverett. , ,V0,,. , `■ '44'''';.r t ., i;-,, -4 SUBDIVISION S 1-86 LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN/KNEELAND ESTAT 'S III NPO It 6 ,e4,,,,.... s, ie .0 Request to subdivide a 8.68 acre parcel into 18 lots, with a minimum lot '' .4, 7* 4 size of 7,500 sq ft. , on property zoned P-4.5 (Residential 4 ' 0 units/acre) Located: Between Kneeland Estates and Cook Park, west of ',,e, Tigard High School (2S1 14A, lot 900) '..:1 ,... President Moen, (Read procedures into the record) "With that we move onto ,... e^ , /..),, item 5.1, staff do we have a report. ., , , ,,, 1„eees eensee Senior Planner 'Newton, "Item 5.1 is a proposal for a subdivision and the 4,nt:se -, proposal is located to the west of SW 92nd just north There's th of Cook Park. , e el, . 8.68 acres inuolved and the applicant's proposing to divide that into 18 lots, te ne consisting of approximately 7500 sq ft, each A little history on this 11 ss 'e.4e2ee application. A preliminary plat approval was granted in 1981, however that - 0 ,; ee.,..es'''. s . , , . e plat was never recorded, and the approval has expired. Uh, basically the ,.. ..„..e , ,., e!.;, ,ei., ,, , applicant's proposals meets most of applicable planning conditions and zoning ,1 code requirements, if certain condition e are attached to the appro4al. We got , I 4 '.1,:1,,.. some problems with steep slopes, which would require a sensitive lands permit, , ewes. particular is the north section of the lot and perhaps, or the property, and ..I:,,, s .: J1 s perhaps in this area here. Uh, any draihageway areas would also require a 7e- ,.e sensitive lands permits before development could occur. Riverwood Lane is ee , -n.e, another concern and Riverwood Lane ends here and staff and applicant would .'..".e' f*..'. n:ss',..0 propose that Riverwood Lane be connected in this area. You 11 notice in your -.... .1 4-'1 staff report, condition number 8 and 9 on page 5, relate to Riverwood Land. C;''!.'''''''''''''''''''':::' This conditions, These conditions were originally proposed then staff was a little unclear as to where this property line Was However, the surveyor has -1 ,e1L,..ee„.„: , , e4e'ir.,., determined that property lines are indeed adjacent and Riverwood Lane can be y"e'',,e .'14,Y! connected, So I would suggest that the Planning Commissioner make that a ' condition and not leave the option available to the applicant in tonditions 8 1 : and 9. Several, Tax Lots, or Lot 7 and 8 have a double frontage here on 93rd 1 Ave. and on Riverwood Lane. The applicant will need to make choice as to which street these lots will be oriented to and also take into consideration, I believe there are some special setbacks involved, and we got to. . and V, ›. well have to make sure that they conform to those. Lot number 16 shall access onto Riverwood Lane, that another important condition. All land in 1 q, op • - the 100 year flood plain will need to be dedicated, and the Engineering 4 - Department is a little bit coileeiened about thie access of Riverwood Lane onto 92nd, how that connection is made and we would like to see some more traffic 0 information on how vision arei access impact might be mitigated. So statff. recommends approval with the conditions as listed in the staff report with the , , bit 1 L . modifications to 8. and 9. and also we need to be a little bit concerned about 1 some of the trees in the area and obtain a tree cutting permit, because with the steep slopes in the area, we could have some problem with erosion if we 'A's:14.'1,:it4 _ are not careful in the remo-val of those trees " t .,..*.,:.,:•'. '', - • .. . . _ rtl,':,i- ,..'''„,.;.4' , , . ,, , , 1-1 , . ,. TRAAISCRIO1 LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND S 1-86 Page 1 ';',',;4:'''''''','",:41:• , '.,.-' 44..:-'''',-14" ' -, ' =. 4 -P•4e e,' .14.: , 1 .e....,44, 'l 1;.",' ,r'r" ' .4'7.' ''''S=MIENEENNZATIORDNEARIBMIVEHMENBoixemanunk.............. ..al':';'4,-Z "‘t,' ,• ' . ,"'t i' ',,t,%,,,'''' '''../-: ,/ : 4)' '''''''''','''',..,1 : * ;. :=:'..bLi.' , ;,7.! , it:. ,..., 11-.1-: ;4:;,:ritit (Several people tc,lking) I , ! '' commissioner Butler, "In the Engineerng Division page, in regards to 16, 17, 4 ,;:.'''':ii and 18, could you address that, The lots extension of Riverwood t.... ,.`44'",it): Lane, , y .. . - -- ----— .--------- 4-- Senior Planner Newton, "Well, yeah, Engineering Department did bring up a ,,; -.Fe concern about the extension of Riwerwood Lane, from 92nd into this area. The ii .,,, ,,4,. Transportation Plan adopted by the City Councils shows Riverwood Lane 1-4 . , connecting from 108th to 92nd. That connection is shown and that is something that the Commission should be are of, that we don't really want to preclude ?. ...44 that option, However, from 92nd Ave. east is not, that connections is not t4Le ,.. '..e.e"-C.4e e shown on the plan, We ought to look at possible connections to serve that 1,..1.; 4,;". I4'1 ... 11, area The Engineering Departments pri.nary concern stems from the fact that 4..,,:;+.}..:•','"':, , 11, '..,i ti ''.1.,:■,',t''' they don't want to see any kind of a offset to Riverwood Lane that would make ! a T intersection and cause some conflicts there, However, if the connection .., e '",,41=,...-;, were made to the north, a couple hundred feet or 300 feet north, that wouldn't , d11)%=. be as big of a concern. There concerned about a close offset here, and also serving the area . . . . . . So you might want to consider a condition /J 1,.. ,J44,-.:, ,2 that would ask that the applicant to come up with some sort of circulation l• /'4,,'7.:"4 plan to serve that area the e east. ".,',;', . ., .■..'P 4,:d f.,' President Moen, "Would that 't"■..:4.",,,,Ir, w It'oi:_. ,;* :he Senior Planner Newton, "There' s some large lots, its pretty large lot ,k ,',-„,'4...44.,f homeites, it not 1: ,. ., .• .,,, ;t„.,„.,,„44,, President Moen, "Okay, thank you staff. Can we have the applicant.'s ..ti • ,,, ;,--: ., ..,..., presentateon please' eeekv1, 4. '.',i reee 'ee e • e. eeeee....,,,,e„ ,i "Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, my name is Norman Harker, HARKE .! 4.,, 1 ,, ,,,,4,4,Ir,,`, "■''''. ',44':'4'7,4-: R, I'm wlth Alpha Engineering, repreeenting the owne , Lincoln savings. 1 ,.., ,44 ,,..4,4,;.4 .., would' like to, t guess Liz has given you background on this project pretty 444' '.,,,"...' ':, , 1, .,-..,' well, The prior approval was, uh, completed by our firm and we did go through ,"I f" -".„''''' '•"'-, ,vs.,:,, .••''',,0,.,"'L. ' the engineering plans and went through the plat, alMost to the state of 4 '.,P ,..:', I., ''''.',: ,,.. ;.:**.• construction and at that time, 81, the bottom ofithe market fell out and the e -, ,,-e ,e,e, project was not completed. The bank theh ended up with the property through a i Sheriffs sale. A couple of items that I would like to clarify, uh, in „I 447,4• ', talking to Randy this afternoon, with the Engineering Department. He agreed '...1 that that connection to north, towards the east would be acceptable, uh, there '.4.. X ,,'..• 1,.... isn't, if you look right at , , . , . . its not shown on your map bu t at the top of tract "A", going to be south bounded by tier. Tigard High Shool. 16 foot 1.' t.. e'. ii.... right-of-way, that serves that parcel back in And, uh, What I discussed With Randy was the idea of just giving tract "A" ,uh, which on your map I donut think is very well defined. Should be a line, right_here, . 1 - , , 4 " Moen, On the 160 ft . ." _ _ a .. Hai-her, "so that gives a couple, §00 . (cough). . . are in there to play with, ..,„,., ,*.A. its hot really useable tor the applicant and they are willing C.', deed that to the City, dedicate that to the City, . . . , . . (coughing)4 . . . . have quite an area in there to determine where the access should be, And we would also and the offset is still 5300 feet, we have no problem With that. The (pause)- gum on the fl, cir. (laughter) . . . The . neighborhood association, fy TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOANC S 1-06 Page 2 . * '*44 * ' .4 id " - '41'' *L'."'".1''.:::'44-'::. ;4/44, 4r-,'':,i":"i '',4 ' .- ,... '4. `'t/;,"'„ , "17-''',0 '.,4''''.'t, '..,:k 4 4 4`.14*,,:r„,..•`•'''•,'4 c., . ‘.; k., ■ r.,. — ' 4 4•1. ..__;: ,- if", r'4..t,,-.'4 ,4,,`:k*'' 0.2.,,'.4,,,,'„,'*, !,..,'''..,,.,,,,',, ..,•„'. ,,,I ',l'i; M •+ n "' rt ., sJn?rant talking in background, can' t hear . , Okay, , . . , ih, t wait , r 4 to add r( there comments later the n. Basically we dgrr.t with the staff y\ ' report, we even rev i ewed it and talk with the staff about the report, What we 5�,, A, }J`"• would like to do is, 5 of the conditions, we would like to make sure. that we Y f i�,�' clarify now, r was talking to Liz, cause_ apparently one of the big problems ,'kr" '- after we get approval, and go back in for the nitty gritty, is making sure that '--- we are-- in .accordance--witch—what--�-we ua deetsttnd ---and--- at--the --Commis-s.ion--�. wl: ,, '. 4 j understands. Item number one regarding the conditions prior to final `' approval. It' s our understanding that we can assure the property, which is . . guaranteed through a bond, for constructions of the streets and so forth to be , 4y;+K'*�'4M,'.;,"" built prior to filing. There is no problem with that'? Okay, just want to n make sure that we don't have to build all the streets and the sewer lines .I ° "` before we can lat. . . . . . ,. . .comment, i . ,. i .comrent from someone not transcribable. . . . . .r . . ,,,�,, p On '_ �' „ item two, street improvements along 92nd Ave, frontage, I would like to add k;, I�',^,� �,,,' shall be installed along the SW 92nd Ave, frontage, to add "lot frontage, � �' g like :l';'\!,,,,,,4%.;,',.,',..1;.„,,'",, to clarify that that is the frontage in front of the lots. " ,a'..,t,..,:...,,..'....,,,,,,,..,?; ' Senior Planner Newton, "It would be ih front of all of the property, it may � � r �. not be lots, . . . , clarify by the engineer condition, but my ' ° ' understanding is that he'd be responsible for these, along open " ..,, i. ,• space, we can double check that " a, ,' Y Harker, "What about tract "A"? In otherworrs we would have, f7 ,T ; �/ Newton, "Anything, its my understanding that anything, that are ultimately. µ,:.:,,:'• ;',';''.6.,',.,.,' ,�,x or originally was part of property is what you would be responsible for." M ` , 'r �° Harker, "Even though we ; � r:r. ;{ t• >i, ■ ', ,. , .. Newton, "Thats standard ,l M `i J• ti',...,, f"',,n� '. '' �;' Butler, "Well if it was a street, it wouldn't retake much sense to put a i� pp ""',k � '3 ,. � sidewalk on it If its suppose to be a terminus for a street. , r �, `, Newton, `BHr can discuss the improvements with r6 rr 1t', wt,.aac /' Moen, "Thant something he would work out with the City, normally he would be responsible for all his property, i , t y g, >,. �tw+,K (several people talking) ` ` d "Moen, ''Okay, go ahead," CA Harker, �� ;� ''Is there a mechanism for a waiver or a remonstrance in the City. fir; Uh, fora LID. - _ O L� Newton, "Well we"r-e not using them as much now. . . . . i I just, uh, I thin,'.. M ♦ = r the conditions should be written the way it typicali is and if �t to+ �� y � { � if you wan t +, x appeal that cay ou can." 4 y _ ` have double fronta ,e would i . oka xfi-t,oror eleven, re ardirAg the two lots that , Harker, That fa.ir-, . . ` , d like to allow the builder the "option of deciding "�` g p � `'' which way to face his home. Uh, suppose we could put a condition on the plat ,, that would specify that there would be only onl` frontage on those two lots '4,;(`M°":' �N..' TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOANO S 1-86 Page i,\";'.:',„'.4.-';',4 ,1 .r 6 .... 1 � � , r::.1..Y..?rt a .. I 7 b iL:, .. -it. p+�.I.4 ',t.:.',..,.- '!.....A-.;..' .., -. _.-. •�_ •r .1. h_ •.:: Yh ,y.i.a A__:.. i ,.:__, aW �:1. •1 .t .Y l+.:w I q.��:.i<. a ��-. .+, „ .: .' �. , , l .3 i",0.--,, -f N'114'(;.: i■:' I ....',"-,.,','.....'''.,■ , (i. „ . ,• :; Newton, "Well, we have a problem with address, whi(.h is why we would like to see them WC don' t want to have one oriented to one street otnd one , 0 oriented to the other. . 4 . . , . . . serious problems . . . . . . when we assign .,--.. . . ,,- ,,,,.,•=4,,.-.- -' addresses before. , — . , . so thats the concern. ., .,,,,,.........--..--, Moen, "All there asking is, Staff wants you to take either 7 and 8 and face them one way or take 7 and 8 and face-ti-tem-the other- wayril--- - ----- . --- -- -- --- Harker, "What would happen if the builder wanted to come in and face his ::..f.'. '.-..'.' house the other way. ;,.,..i. ' .,... Newton, "You would have to do an address chavIge and you would have to notify , all the utili'l-ies and everything." ',"•,., ...'. Harker, "That's not a big prablem." ,i , . .,,;..-t • ,,,,,, Newton, "Well, yes it is a problem, its real time consuming, it would hold up 0- -. . . . .„ rer',.....'..., there permit process, . Its not impossible, its not recommended. " ..'.•,::`:,,,,_,,. „,,.. i.,: Moen, "Do you as a developer have a preference?” *. 1 , , . Harker, "No, not as a developer, we wouldn't. ft would be the person who's 1,..., 1,.' ,, ,:.... ., building the house would be the one," Uh, number fourteen regarding the 100 6.,,t.,:' '''-'-.,..' year flood plain, I have no problem dedicating the majority of the flood 4 .,, •.,„--•,, - plain, we do have three lots that, in order to square the lots up somewhat we ...,,,: , ,,, -e encroached a few foot into the flood plain. We would like to clarify that as , rr.',4,7:-,,,, . . , ..., . 6,,,,, , '''......"-1'4. ,* saying that the applicant proposes to dedicate e...tie 100 year flood plain for greenway purposes, except those areas noted one the preliminary plari. . • y• . ,,VI'l.:.K.''''''' '14;;:' ,,,„-, ,....!, Newton, °We've done that in the past and uh, Picks Landing, there 'Is some „ „, ,t,',,,, '.,,..i ,' -,',,,,,,„ lots that have a portion of there hack rnrd is in the flood plain.” , ;.' ;, ....... Mt v,"......,i1-,V,, "Harker, "Basically thats it, we, the other items Liz has covered and we ,:,. *:.':,,,,dk agree with standard subdivision assurance.e the public works projects and so , ., , ,, s• t. - - , ,. forth% Any questions, ..1 ,,,) ,. :',„1,,' ,;...,,,,;,.,.:,.,-, ,,.., ,,' ,..., Moen, "Any questions?" "okay, fine. Is there someone here from the NP0?." ,..,4„.:,..,:. r,,L : .:.., ..'''.„,.: ..'. Newton, "I have a letter. To Tigard Planner Commissioner from Phil Pasteris, Chairman NPO / 6 Recommendation for denial and referral to NPO # 6 on application number S 1-86 Lincoln Savings and Loan. The NPO 6 Chairman has . received numerous calls from residents concerned about the above referenced application. These calls resulted from the City of Tigard public hearing -, notice being given after the NPO meeting which Addressed these, this • , ' ti.". ardOlication, 'It is -clear to me as Chairmn, that at do to notification timiiig , ..1 I that the NPO lacked the input required to make an informad decision, - subsequent to the NPO meeting the Chairman -has met with reitidvnts and has _ .. - determined that they have a sincere interest in the planning process and are ' in - willing to work with the Developer and the NPO In resolving their -concerns, Tfierefore, I a'm asking the Conamission to, number one, -deny the a ,pplication .,* - and- number two, rp* recomend that the developers and citizens meet with NPO 6 on re - , 1., L oruary Ili), 1986, to review the proposed deVelopment, ... Moen, "Is there anyone. here from the CCI? Uh, with that we move onto the .„ ,.i ,...,..,; ,.. ,_., , „_ .ear)Ing porIc.. , , - public nion of the meeting,- uh, for those in.favor, Mr. Harker has already 'Spoken,. ultili, Tim Patrick. * . - . - TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND S 1-86 Page 4 , ,4 A Cl'f1;::,t71:L,L1Y;::: , ,,, . , , , .. ,4 ,I, ,,..t.A..... , , , ,,,,, . ",40,—..",,,, , ''',. .,,,,',' '',..•,J'..1W ... ',, A,.—.1 ' .'",, . 7 ::1%' S \",,I.".0tW,, ' , ..t ''''',-.;d . , — --___ ) c;..,.'_1„*..—. .... +'•T .:1,'4 ,- , a t ''',...:'. , ` " k ! ..",:. '1,;:"',k."-` i Patrick, "No comment." „.: 1' if. k,t., .,1 Moen, "Okay, with that we will move onto those in opposition, uh, first Guy , Mount ..,,, . ,, ,7....,',. . ... t•,,,i.,t.i,,',--.71„n,,' ".my ...name ..i s. Guy_ Mount .and Llive at eeaseteeletereeeeceLerweecee. ie_reght,_. __ _ _ , . v; my family is, right next to adjacent to the proposed sub development. I approciate the opportunity ta speak uh to the Planning Commission this evening , 1 and I will be brief. Uh before I get started I want to do two things. 41.-fr,.;:- , , , . ,t First, I want the people preen e from the Riverwood, the Copper Creek area, ) ft ,..-.; the Kneeland Estates, and the 92nd street people who are here to stand and be e. recognized. Uh, secondly, I would like to do two things, one is uh, present ,.71%.4.% ,.:;.,,' petition that the residents of the area have eigned stating some of there - ,.., - 9 concerns, and also distribute to you our brief critique of the staff report eeO,ee that you all have dated February 4. (pause) " ei e. \e . e.„.. ,)1 Newton, "You should read what the petition says for the record." .....,. ''. eel,eee 1'''... :t.e Secretary, "I also need a copy of what you give to the Commissioners." -. . ) „'= '. 0 Mount, "The petition says, we the undersigned residents asked for denial of ..;. 4,-4, the proposed Lincoln Savings and Loan 1 - 06 / Kneeland Estates III proposed „!...1 ''''''' '''.;.'1.*'.. 1e--;,...'1':, development for the following reasons: j., Notification was given after the i 1 i't. ' NPO meeting. Therefore, the residents were not part of the established e e .e eee .e e.et-,ete planning process at the NPO level. Number 2. Uncertainty of traffic safety on e -., .'teie. !.. . ... the proposed intersection of 92nd and Riverwood Lane and increased traffic e'lee.ee . , . .. .... flow on Riverwood Land and the proposed extension. Number :3. Concern 0; ..-"qe:e regarding the use of the flood plain and the development of euisting natural greenway. Does everybody have a copy? short one. (pause) I just have two .,,etle.ee short items then I will turn it over to some other people who would like to ... , talk. I have numerous concerns with respect to the planned subdivision, o... e because I live adjacent to it, my family lives adjacent to it. Some of those eeee-. 'e . e'l issues are going to be talked about tonight, but many of them are not, which el oteeloee leads' me to me overriding concern, and that ie that, uh, the residents in e 4., general were not given notification prior to the NPO # 6 meeting that I 4 believe was January 22nd, and as residents we feel strongly that we should e, .11..e..'".ee ;''..-,i'',,,,,e have the right to enter the process at the NPO leeel, We got are notices a ee'e..'...o week ago and we feel that its just not right to be able to walk into a process ,a'4,41,'^lk V..., you know nothing about and try and uh, act in the properte manner. We sort of .'. feel the meeting this evening is premature and we emphasize our support with -.., q ,' Phil Pasteris, the Chairperson of NPO g 6, oh, that we should that this, for CL 1 ' .... lack of a better word, meeting set aside till the residents, the developer, , eg 11,-. t and the NPO organization have a chance to get togeth and go over some of these 00 ' critical istues. Uh, I, I re- mphasie that. If You -don't -have any more questions of me I would like to turn it over to Liz Collins who is the uh, head of Copper Creek_Homeowners Associations, She has a couple things she want. to talk about, unless you have any queitions. i Moen "FortUnately Liz Collins is the next one on the list." .1 "He knew that (laUghter) Uh, My name is Liz Collins, I'm President of Copper ,i'■ ; Creek Home Owners Association and uh, kneeland Estates Homeowners has also ) asked us to represent them since we have a viable organized Copper Creek Hone i . Owners Aeeociation up and running. We_ are not aware of whether Kneeland . 4 1.,1 ■kt,4.,4't,;t1',,' . i .i: . TRANSCkIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAM) 9 1-06 Page 6 ,',,' •''',' ' 1 ''',',4,bl% 4%,,■% .. " .j': j',..'. ,, , 4:‘,..',,. 0",1''," .',.,, ,r," "1..? %L.1.1'`,"': ":',it72",*::::,■:':! ',.',':.,"1:''''',','.' '','''':". ll'I''Y''1,i,i,';'':•.:1;:','I''' .14,,;1';',1' ..',.-":,:** ''',..': f'1:1.4'1..:2'.‘'., "'"'),14!'iL'''':',:',',.1,: .:1.,::"'.:.'17' •,,''' 't:''''1*'''''' 4,...,—,,•,,,, ,, „,,..., -,,,. ,., , . ., a . ■ 6: ' 4, Estates has one or no' . h, you had touch on earlier abou . the concerns about ...i i. traffic, We aro very conrut,ed because trt Subsection 8 and 9 it had indicated ' tha't there was going to be a turnabout in Riverwood Lane, therefore it would be a cul—(e—sac area, it wouldn't be a thru street on 92nd and Riverwood Lane. But the proposed site map, as well as the developers application ..-, indicates that there will be a thru street so 92nd and Riverwood Lane would - ----.. — i.ntersect y 1de have a, real eproblem....wit hothatobecause 92nd .onetive upeesids_ea_._____.____________,..;,1.: blind hill and if that intersects in any way, we feel that could be, there o-• could be possibly potential for traffic fatalities with children and pets. So loe. thats one of our concerns, I think we need to discuss if we sit down to talk about this at a later time. Oh, the next thing is, if indeed this, this at e'e•- eee any time is approved, you know, we would like to have some type of traffic , study done because Copper Creek, excuse me, Cook's Park is a very busy park, - , .,, one of the largest in the state of Oregon and if at any time if any of you oee ... ...e.,,, have seen that park or have enjoyed that park during the Summertime you can , . eeo so, imagine what type of traffic flows in there. Many of those people would probably like to take their shortcuts thru Riverwood Lane, which would go thru .e . .f,.• 4,', Copper Creek Development and uh, so thats a real concern of ours too. Uh, I eee, would like to turn it over to someone who wants to talk about the educational blows by adding property or houses to that. . . , . . Oh, I'm sorry . . . . okay now .,..,....,. . e,e where going to talk about the flood plain. Sally. * ,J,t , o-... Mon, "Before we get started with Sally are there any questions?" eo ' Collins, "I'm sorry was there any questions?' .,;:.. .4:., •,...•,. el/ A.0.4.ee Moen, "I had one qoestion, uh, with respect to the streets here, uh, are you 3e: saying that what would you propose, do you have a problem with this wo e.; connection to 92nd danger of the intersection. iV.,... ":.;,■4 1., ,.,... .' ...., .."'.',11 Collins, "Yes, becaUse on the up side of 92nd, its a hill, and it, it come 1...' down, I can demonstrate. It comes down like this and Riverwood would ' e , toe that intersect this way. Thats a possibility t people could be driving very , quickly along 92nd and there could be a problem." -... '., r'44 Moen, "What would be your proposal or alternative?" .,,.,,,. ,7* Collins, "That Riverwood would Not ',-Ao th.-u." ...., ,':': :41: ■"'..7, Moen, "Would not go thru on this end or this end?" ee e ..; Collins, "That end." 9, a▪ it, s Moen "This one, - .., 40 .. ' .,•:1 , Collins, Well, we would hope that maybe it wouldn't go thru at all we like ." 3 : - , it the way it its. We don't want any changes " - _ _ _ . . ... ...,. 5 A • Moel, "I undc,-stand that, Okay. Uh, next Sally Arroyd " _ - ' .... _ _ 1' SallYI. Arroyd, "Arroyd, I live at 9505 SW Riverwood Lane, I'14 on the-ether side of the Mounts but adjacent to lot numbe four on the plan. I would just .r.,., ...... like to say in spooking for the citizens of Copper Creek, Kneelavld Estates, 1..„,., and 92nd, uh of who were recognized here. We have a concern with the findings .and conclusions of the staff report. With existing water and sewer ,.. . .. - '---r--—, '' ■ • TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN BAVINGS & LOAND S 1-8 Page 6 , ,&-....,,,. -,, ,. 4 k 'Po:".,:e.,.,,,',•',•,',.•,',., .41'■ '44. 4*:.4 " Av '1.'''''',*;ii ":,''t'4,!,i;..i:, 4*, ',„",'.,',.'"1,'t,",,'^,t,,,,,4". 10-„. ,,, v,,.. .., ,,,,,,,,,, ,„4„,.,,i4'",-7,,„ ,..,,,;. L v---:,,,,%,11,, -.,1,,,„r'h, •'Y N S 1., ..�r•+. r>.c r.,r.G ir(..r : r•. ,`f.„. ..: t.a. F :;::'4,:j,''':: b d v. t r . ,xJ Y P f. ee`~ e�,,P 'RF:' � 1.".'`...'.”,r !" y; � 1 c 1, v`i I .•+c x. . ,. _ V I:rw ` f r ilities, wc) want to m�4kp sure that its not just adequate. We have heard ��rt.,; _� horror tiles where water pressure goes down and people have to cone in ,' bui l.d '4.119 i''; .,> :--;...-..1 p ; ' water towers and you get into a whole mess of things , We would l i.ke a study r , done to make sure that there i.s more than adequate water and sewer fabeintion i:...' r� �' to handle the expanding development, And we also do have a concern rn g , .q.',::'»;.1.'".:, the flood plain and the impact of building within the sensitive area Li,z , i +'^' mentioned uh, tree commentts,--eresian•,. --things- --1-iake�-- that,--a.s-_-far..- as the---- 1 i �,, , 'e engineering plan. We do what a study of that A geological study, whatever w r>,`� you call it. We want to make sure that there is going to be no unnecessary ,.':- 4 y= w `Y /,! eroeion that will cause anything, any of ours to all of a sudden disappear, a, ". 1 y a' r I'm not making myself ver y clear, but we are concerned with, in a nu •sh e .4 a4 ' '° " , 4 with the sensitive land area issue as well a s t he 103 year f l ood p lain issue. -,-'1{ Building in, if you look at the plan there, of course there are three homes , that will built in the flood plain, but also, part of the street will be in d ` � "h,; the flood plain, and I believe in th. Engineering findings that they do ,• • ).ti',�.� mention that none of than road '" ' �� 1 ',-,",...,',',,..,:',.e.`-‘ Moen, ""According to the map that we have F,a �re nonQ of the streets are in tfr� '' ' """'' flood plain. Except for 92nd which goes down into the Park." " .. .�,e'' "" i its close. Its close. We dla want to ' , „.!,4 '1 Arroyd, Oh, okay, alright. , ';',^u";.":;..;:' make sure that of course the flood plain is maintained, turned t.0 greenway, ry'a el, M; 1, ,; , r whatever. Thank you ose are ry . ,,ti Nay 1 p° r 4 I ,k ' '.4, Moen, ""Okay,'° i ' w Y x . N i)' ` , Arro,yd, ""Any questions?"" 'f.4 Moen, "I don't believe so, right now, thank you Uh, Dan Leslie." u1 ' lit 4 4. a i �r ri k. x ""My name is Dan Leslie, I live at 9540 " Riverwood Lane and I"m a concerned n . member of the Copper Creek Homeowners Association. I uh, being an X educator ,° py L ,W� ., ,1 r` , ; I'm concerned with the growth of Tigard in general and in that area, having .' ;'f,, r, r young, children that will be attending school, and knowing that the problems .,. ,,, + that the district is having right now with the growth, . , (coughing) .1 ra; wr � .1 M uti, " ` Superintendent i . . . . addressed this very issue today at the high ;r, ��,}i school level, with thtix, high school teachers, trying to get some input or, which ' R �. . new direction they are going to take with the growth of Tigard. It seems tha ,, it is going from a very small. City, 33rd in Oregon to like 13th in the State, v�! as far• as states go and population and I don't think thlis district is able to keep up with this continued growth that has taken place. Uh, this, this new : ,, w subdivision would be a optional area, which means that the district can go .a .�, Zonal wreathe students would attend. They could 4r.i :, either way yearly on which school ,, ( `, attend either the Durham Elementary School or the other School, next to the ; ra e _ - °— : Junior High, Templeton. • And, this, the `High School right "now is experiencing i terrible growing pains in that it is built for 900 to 1,000 students _ . °. CO currently enrolled 1500 to 1600 students and they are _ going to have to build �. i y y wth - i additional schools, as it is already,- and I'm con y i., � with the High School is the traffic created by 3, concerned about the grp 1+� there+. mother issue, dealing. , •�. g High School drivers in that �' the High School and the driving habits of young g ii . ' They L tend to use the hifI quite a bit for different playing. Y lau��hter . activdities and the � do' r 'area. a activities, y are up grid dog �n the hall a y doa , e and there is a lot of foot traffic going thru there as well, because they like ' i i g to the access to the during es_ that they • p dur�n the tim. at the are not �n class ,atd we ::::,,,,),,../11',g,, , . c he ark i . feel th± t this would also bring about some unwanted high school traffic .thou I Y° , xr =dt 1q + TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOiiitiD S 1—Os Page 7 , ...0: „. 4 I 1 I,G ” r '' ,t c ,.. , .... .. .r... ....n .. r .,,. .I.�' t.-:..•.. x!F v ,.... ,. ....tt. ...,4r a 1. .xis ,� + r;�' ,xst .,.� rl..:.r., „.4,,,,. .„,,,,,,,,,.:. Nh a ,r -,3„, ,. .. .. , :. .,..: ., . Y.. 15. , �, '..;d �4 ,_. ?j �".- . 1-' y t p, .__ . , a a._.,h'... :.. s..,:. �_ « .-. » .,.r,... ,.:,{, i. A„ �” N.� 't ,',',`,,s � t r � � x.'' N u -. . � ,iM f ,7 Y u w --- kL _ .1 .'.W t I ti �r � aC # ',1,,'.. � y, a zr. f:.:. � y Y .�'; I � >, , .�� __ -`=7. �kc,1 .1�."ri k:.-1°'J 1 ac!��,77w 1 i r •!�.�': 1,_•x.�'�' J It�r w �°. �,w'I�"a Q � � � yR p. d, } 11,�(�, r { �"`ldFr,,1. Y t .:,e.-;,,e,.,',,:,;'.0=0',44-1,=,'',; w..f. .S { 'a`!6f„ tth �d. .,.a .rl , .�y ` �F:: , ". Yrl„,., . ...,,. .._.�.,, .....,. _.. -. —... r Yi ice:' 1k j. , . ti ` 4uµ.', it M• iN , V .i w I Y ^. {� >elµ.', ay,a f ,.: ,, .� „,t, w, t.h.' subdiv�i.sion and Riv._;.-wood Yes 'it tands hay no strip signs, Everything ,,, coming into Rive r'worid has stop signs, it itself has no stop signs and does N,!`�~- �;'', open to quite a bit of fast moving trarffic. And we r�a�jl like `2 El leaue •it�a�lf p q . k;�' `,�,�;” during time: that there are soccer games, and football games, uh, being ,�' r, " attended at the high school that there would be an excess of traffic coming " ' thru that area, where it is not accessible at the current. Any questions? K9 _ Peterson i"This information your expressing about the schools, is this coming 7ka �li from the school district or is thi: just your own opinion?" , r �, S ' ::�M . ail 1, 4 ` "',' ` Leslie, "It is from the School District• I tried to talk to Superintendent , °'1 �' ' Joki myself today, he was not available because: he was spraking at the high �q .YU .°.-:::.''''' •- ' school, I get my information thru a teacher there. My wife is a teacher at `'' n" Tigard Nigh School, currently, and is also very aware of the problem there,`° `�::, x 'e t,�.`w Moen, "Do we have a letter from the School." , 1 Z,p'6 rL ''i�` Newton, They were notified and had no objection. We always notify the . . . ,4:, goo ,rr F ',. t �x '' • i '�,n Y,, . . 4 . ,several people. , • L y "1 Leslie, "If I may make a comment. The high sehoal principle did make a „"' 1!M7 ,'. y get type ° tats why? T`1 >} �,. comment that the do not et xnwolved a,n this t e of situation and t 1 ,„, >,-,Y,„I they made; no comment, because they feel like they can't they're straddling two `;�l. p sides there, the y don t want to have an y oore growth there.” ,<& , � / �, a Moen, "What we do, as part of policy, staff is required, actually requires ,,,...1 C � `1 e w, � ,,"j=' the applicant actually" , ,a` /., Ju , Newton, "No, we notify the School District Office, and generally we will get '�; i either no comment back or some information on the . . . . in this particular l, 'l case we have a standard form that goes out and its mailed to them with a copy `e 1_ "`, of the proposal, and an explanation, and in this case, uh, let see, uh right 1' Y, here, yeah right hear, they have checked sit and says we have reviewed the fy have e,J ,,,,,. = b proposal have no objections and then its signed by the person who and Y eee .r; �,, �J , ,these go to the c istrict office. 4 'k t f 'yYJ .5- I ;,f :�' ' Moen, "Just n oppf rtunity for the District to , 4+ai 'd' . ..a. Leslie, "I concur with what hies secretary, she did say that they do , get these 1'orms and unless t lerrre is any extreme problems they do helve no f ; 'f, I ,4*.., . n Moe , "Mt, . rkArker , w g ko m uuld .,,,.. i ,A ;;...w .rlot,, % -4,.i..:: % ,1 4., .. :., ',,A ,H, y ,% . ,-,- 7 .:''1,%. address the issues that have been specifically raised." g .4 ,. /'1, 4' ,„it .k--.::' Harker, "Okay . Very briefly, regarding the W Lghborhood Association, T did ,`.11,..-,,, . . call Phil Pasteris, two weeks ago, uh, ho was aware of the project t asked if I could come to'the-NPO meeting and-1-went-to-I t -and-e iqp 1-a-ined-the-proiect \ I, 1;= .ff..,,; \ to the Neighborhood Associations at that time they passed a motion to forward .,--,- =,, a recommendation for approval to the Planning Commission and today, I talked .' •° -, ..'-. to staff, they had apparently changed their mind. I did also, uh, or Friday, was in the City office and met with staff, and at that time, purposely to find -', ..... 1=;:.:-.2, out who the neighbors would and how to contact some of the neighbors and at ,,:-.,1 that time met with Sally Arroyd, and explained a little bit of what the ...,,,,,,.. project was like and gave her my card and offered to meet with the neigbhors, ' i. ,1'., ,1 , uh, on Monday in the day or in the evening, whatever, and asked her to give me , :et, 1.:': \ a call and I didn't hear anything, but I did offer to meet with them, so as ,,... , '=, ,:-= '. ,„,==.....--q..= far as the applicant's concerned we've tried to work with the neighborhood ,, kz::- J. ,4-:•,;'14 1",,,..' asmociation and the neighbors. As far as the issues brought up. Its not a ‘,;',.-:4,-. ;,4 whf)le lot different from neighbors who buy on a dead end street, thats stuck '1) .„ , . ti.t.f...,3,.. .,,,, into the woods, its a nice place to live until the inevitable comes and we, ,. . . uh. Several items were brought up, one is that Riverview Lane being extended . P. .- e,.. onto 92nd would provide . shortcut, And I m, 1'm not sure just where that ., ( 3:„ would shortcut to. It seems like, rather a non factual statement to say that , ,,,,,,,, ,,, - -;e.4,,,,,,., . it would be a shortcut through somewhere because I'm not aware where Riverview -,0.4:',.,... - Lane should shortcut to The connection point, is basically given, there's, ,,, , 4,,,.. 1,...,;r1,:,..'''..':',, if we move further away from the top of the hill there would be a into the ,,... ., t.. , .f.:‘, . flood plain or we switch the connection with Riverview Lane on 92nd as far . , 4 south as possible, there is about 300 feet of sight distance available: We .-4. ...:;":' agree that there is a hill at the top, and uh being an observer that the high t ' -i-. r.ichool students do come over the hill fairly quickly. And °UT". basic feeling „, , ,-;,,,,...ii- is that thats an enforcement problem, and I'm not surf. what we as a developer, ' . representing a developer, could do 'about that, that type of situation. I sympathize, but, I'm not sure what our perimeters ara in there, I don't -know ,.. to much about that Is there any questions. .., Butler, "Yeah, I had, was there input from the Tigard Water District about Newton, "I don't have the copy of a response sheet from them , Harker, "We did receive plans previoUly when we went thru the process in 91 ■., n. .. they, at that time, drew their own pins up and, uh, drew up plans to service the propertv. There is there is water at both ends and they, and there would an intertie, is what they would like to see happen, between 925id and ,. iRiderwood Lane. -Butler, "Okay. There weren't any sewer plans, where , . . . . . . . . . - 1,, 051 .4 fin Harker, Sanitary sewer is in an existing cul-de-sac and it goes-do south.- _ . - ..., ....1 . . e., . .several talking. line. . . The does go down into._ the truck line, dOwn by a ' Moen, 'Commissioner Leverett do you have any questioos." , ..4 - - TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOANO S 1-96 Page 9 e. .-•,:,.... ,.•"at ,,.. ..." .;,:,,,-',1..!..' "":1:■,"% •4`1, le:I' ■.4'Z.,`,..;,,.)1,m' s ..;t1,'■'' '.4."*.f. 14.„:, ',:,'",i,:. , Levrett., " _ „ Lots 1, 2 and 3 there, there is a smal, portion in the flood .:.,;'T1,,,,..,,,' pIain Uh, Do you have any idea iF you took those out of Lhe flood plain, if ° there would be enough there to meet the requiremens?" :,t'■T''''''',77'.„1, 4. ,,4 .4:*.:, ' 0, 1:,.,.....7,1':' Harker, "Sensitive area? We could provide the area without a problem, 4,A+.„4 - what you would end up with is a lot that has a lot of jigs and jogs -in it. h ....,' Leverett, "Yeah, I understand that." ..r. rt'Ikt '''« .•■4..' Harker, "For the person who buys the lot and trys to build a fence, that ..:,,,,‘,,,,' .'‘,. really frustrating. .. ',...,......;;;L ., Newmn, "The land between the 1.00 year flood plain and the street between ,::.,,,t,4 lots 2 and 3, between 1 and 92nd Ave t ' ,,, '',A Harker, "We'd dedicate, If I: read you right, your talking about the small .„,,,e4. • .0.-:::. portions, everything from the street to the south with the exception of the ,,,.. ,:t- '1"• '-,: ',- lots would be dedicated to the City. There would be no reason to huve flag ,.. strips Newman, "Here it says you will dedicate area in the flood plain.'i "'.. Harker. "Right, No, are intention would be to dedicate everything to the '. 1 ,• ,,,,),.., south of the right-of-way." e. -<4 . ..'''''..',•:,* ,I' ,.■I. ■• . '1 .,' •'''',14.,''+.1*'t't*,., Newman, "And my understanding is that street improvements would be included ,,, b. along those areas?" 1",■ t :'i ,„,* , •• -... ', :::',..1 karker, "mats correct " • :,,,... ;,.„,...b,t„,b,r...•...-„ at Newmari,,, "Even though they Oon't abut a lot," ,--,.'„,...,..t -; '...", _ .. ...., . ........... '.:1 '%,,,,,',A-4:, t...,': -. ,b.i*' 4 Harki , "Thats right." -:..., , Moen, "Okay, any other questions?" -, . .i- ',„: :-. • _ Leverett, "I was wondering about the sight. , . . . . 1 know the county • -.4•-• "i''‘'..:-, . . . . , .several talking Harker, "I'm not sure what the speed is on that, on 92nd, Leverett, "No I mean sight distance over the hill, Harker, "Well, again thats predicated on the speed, If you have a 50 mile ,, ....1 road then the sight distAnce is considerably longer than for 25 miles per hr. ,- 1 do-r -ist know." " _ _ _ _ '.. %-..0 - - .. . .„. -.. ....„ . . . . . .several talPiing . . . . , - . • _ - , Moen, 41 have a q-estions for Mr. Mount, uh, give you a chance to address that, I would like to know particular what , shortcut, where would the I, a short cut be . . (1,. '1- ■' '1..7,>.• '4',■'■10'1'...0,V.1 Mount, ' "Well, 1 wasn't the one who brought that up, but that brings up another 600d point, "6h, directly- relating to what the gentleman said • .... . . • :::::I:j concerning his Efforts. '.-..,,':-',/, . , TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAMO S 1-86 Page ','I.0 ,-, -, t --,,,,,,, ,,-;4..1....,1. 1.-4.,e,e,r7Fz:,,'..4.,;',:i ,L:. 1), .....,,,,,,,,,.. r,:,...1.r.:0.4Y7.:,,,,,- Yq.:,:',.::1::.-','„4.11, -...''..:„Ji:t.. :Ll'-' 4,,,,," e, eieee. -.. " ',4 I ,.,°°. % -''4 . Mopn, "I halve to ask you to address my question " .1 Mount, "Oh, 1 would be more than happy t.... do that Uh, the, what you get, is you get kids going 50, 60 mile per hour up and down 92nd, Arid what we don't -.,,A-"" ' ;,?..„'.010-'.. 1 what have happen is to have, after football games and after soccer parties ,,,'..,: .1.:,..-"' neeeee,''.1' down at Cook .Park,e_haing them short cut through Riverwood Lane to get up to _ Durham down by the King City side. Uh, we also don't want to iiilaki tat-just --- -- '- - another avenue out at excessive rates of speed, regardless of what they are Oh posted at Uh, it brings back us to another issue, and thats what the 1-?J! gentleman said, we didn't know about any Neighborhood Planning Organi,-etion L'1=',.' ...',.., VI;"-ii;,-1?..:,:'.',', meeting. If we would have had the opportunity to go to that uh, I would „,,,,, venture a guess that he didn't check to see if anything had been sent out to the people who where affected, which it was not, because it was done after the t . fLieve'', .' actual meeting on January 22. e''..4.* ,'':, e le'''el:e=0".., Moen, "Meeting requirements for NPO's is not a requirement." ce.-e'..7 f., Newton, "May I address that one sentence? When an application comes in we f, , ee, notify the applicant to contact the NPO Chairperson. The NPO Chairperson, who ") is a citizen like all of you, who takes his time and his committees time to . hold this meeting. They have regular meeting nights in the month and their agendas are always posted. They call the meeting at their convenience, often they are held before public notice goes ouf: on the hearing, because of the 4 ', ,,' schedule of the people involved. It often happrans, its unfortunate, but the '.1' 4■'' '%, l'''''4': way the systom is set up its between them and the devcAnper when they want to hold their meeting. ' ee..,ee• Mount, "Oh, and I appreciate that, and that just reiterettes my feeling that J as ei neighborhood we ought to have, we ought to be down on the ground level, ,,:t „ becemse that directly effects us. And, uh, regardless of how much time it takes or how difficult it is we feel it should be done." e ‘,eie, _ . . ..-1'''.,:?, ,,. 4,'-,',1, ee i, ",% ee."4:(1- Moen, "Okay," 4 '''''''''''', "',.. ' ''' '''' .,‘ Newton, "Theres no specific uh, . . . . , There's no specific ej.sht distance requirement, Road I think thats probably why the Engineering Department asked for the traffic study, Secretary, "Presi.dent Moen, I would like to make one comment. That we are looking for people who are interested in becoming members on the NPO and if . 4 anyone Would be interested, that if they would contact me at City Hall I would :4 116 ler be happy to give them an applicatiott." - . Moen, "What it boils down to is thats the way you find out whats going on in the NPO is that someone from your neighborhood organization be active in that. We do have a problem, you should all be aware of that state law puts us under a constraint that Under a certain amount of time, from the time the developers ,..2bmits his application until we have to have it completel” - "- '4 ildj 4' .. processed with. all appeals, and if wo don't process it in that period of time with either a yeh or nay its automatically appi.7oved as submitted. So we are . working under a tight time constraint, Its for everybody, to help the - developer and to help the whole proccss . „ , , so we don't get burdened down." . - 4 - 41,•,,,,4,,,,..,,,....',„4 . X".''''', ■,, , TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LAND S 1-86 Page ii e-e'C.,Ae 4 xr ; ik . , C 4 j e, / ,14 . a y. {;.• :'•—i"' .. ; uts k r, � , P ''':• x, , y' 1, h r, mil» '�) ' / , �.k'I. ,4�, X,'1{ R'. %x:11 Mo6nt, "That brings up ranothc r 1 'auc 1,1, t. L think you r�� e? t want to b°' aware " ^• ji ', of, and that is you might what to have the traffic study done during the !, '`.;, summertime period of time where you get a lot of people into Cook Park. .Right now you don't have the traffic flow going back in there, rir+ °. i"u t r .,"2* Moen We will have to take that into account as part of our decision process. Any other questions Commi a.s,ioners?_ W .th that I chase th!a Public �,, "^,,, Nearing Portion of the Hearing. Commissioners?" ,.„ .„.4,., ..,4, ' ;f' I think its appropriate, its a little late . . . tape ended I , Fe r .g,c` �ewTllan, live on the extreme other end of Riverwood Lane, three lots from the other' ' ,i "ti` ee end, so I probably should just state the fact that I don't think that my ''"` ." my ability objective , ,..1 , living that close t�� the neighborhood will affect m abilZt to be 4�bople :, '0,A... ''', , ,, . in this particular situation. Although I have had a lit of input from �y' °r fi� "' in the neighborhood. w. ;_ `v = L dF Y °� has gnat hasn't been ',...',A ., G,t ' Moen, Okay, maybe you could if there has been anything p hasn't *' `„'J , ,.'', brought up, maybe you could enlighten us to some of that input when the time r cot,e., Commissioner Butler, do yJu, I'm going to go down the line to get h 11 Qt :; " comments, then we'll make our decision, Commissioner Butler?" e49, J Butler, "I have no comment." .` " � k`^ r ,4:',4 Moen, "Commissioner Peterson" r' ".4 * Peterson, '°dell. I was a little concerned about the possible lack of notice, 4 `,x ,4--.',",",,'4e 7 , the citizen had, but there does appear that there was some attempt made. The 4.'' ;'� '4 other concern I had is uh, possibly problems t • , , w there is some ropblems with the traffic f ; r' r, an Riverwood Lane, but T do believe that that an boa wouldbcheckhas they would wou d ,,,' r `` that is was going to be a thru street and anybody check, y 1'rh ,`'"-' have seen that. As far• as the rest of the subdivision, would be i'lood plain`s ,1' , ,I.! t' } and such, I don't have any problem. il:l'ii,:: :",,,,i'r' when, "Okay, I have one quick question for staff? If I understand it right, " 4 ran; ^. the rest off`, the adjoining oining subdivisionis developed right up to this lot line '';';',,,-4 . at this point," ,, ; 19 Piewton, "It's a deve'iopd subdivision,1° i S 1 4 y :- Moen, "The road ends right whore . . .'` Newman, "And there are houses built on those lots and they are occupied.°" >.�, „ Moen, "Commissioner Borgmann?" °* a Bergmann, "We have two ©r three points, one being logical htoeme two that all .that _``, y o . .' "�� It would seem l „„ • potentially nave double .access r house sane street, Riverwood Lang, but there might be some- ' eet, River�o _ reason why l mf not aware of, as to why i t would be better to have them frorit ," that ' =Aµ ,,:; on 93rd- Avenue. But it seems that neighbors adjacent to them, _and that they ought to hlave street hou»e numbers and houses that face the same direction` instead of having back yards facing Riverwood Lane. I don't see any problem Li lots 1, 2, and 3, slightly encroaching in the flood plain, that going to � : , t, y bet3usttlwn and fence, and in Most cases the house could not be built ,n the '" `,),c'-,...,:c!,-% flood- plain- area. Engineering Department has required traffic study, even P, TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS `a LOANB S 1--86 Page 1 it # ... ,r = - .e,.;. ._. . k_:P 4, ,%y.yt„ y' .F F:}7 ha 1 py,.:� A, :a,1,,Mt G ;,,,,,,,,,i4:..w1 r.•w�� JAR,14,1,4v 4.n� < n�...0 d t,,�Jxh,r4 I 4 i4 'W± '� i N.r a;,.r .W P ,V j 1 o a l r N tr c,rr M,»' }{.1sw,A ,t M1 r t♦ p ” },l,, ' b,�, E di Iu .x'4 � :t' Y, ..�w. R * '4 ,a � at �! 4 . ..ic% '.11. .,..,,,■.,.. ,.',,,,, 4;,,,',",** ..•,,, thpugh, that is a 'C intersection creatqd, , , . . . . .' :. . . . . . Therq y.'- .,..4.., , . , '' question about number 8 and 9. A street i s a thru stet, is that., 8 & 9 it,:::::„*.,," . would both be stricken from th” roccmmendation." 4,'...4, Newton, The concqrn was that we might not be able to make this improvement because actually whether or not the two improvements would meet, physically meet because of the prof4erty Line. The survey Department has determined that ,...,-,1", they will if germane. §o, I talked with RandyCl-arno this afternoon and he b4e,t,", .4:,,e1 ..,'-" .-4',..e.'4:',# had asked that the improvements be required and that the streets be nequired to connect." , - 417"T3'':. 'l', Bergmann, "So that would strike number 8 and ..ri '1)::':."41 Butler, "So we change number 9 to SW Riverwood Lane would connect to the -'eze' Copper Creek Development and in number 9 several people talking. . . . - , .`.',/,t,'„- ',1.4'';' it says something about a turnaround in number 9 several talking not transcribable . . . . . Wiet,:e0l ,e4- ., Bergmann, "I don't think it would be possible to let that dead end . . . . — . . much, much to long for safety for emergency vehicles to ,•.4r Moen, Commissioner Newman?: 4 Newman, "I only have two concerns, I think, knowing the neighborhood, I think ° eee - ,444, ' ' the lot size are in character with the layout and fits in real well. But I ,4-7. - ,-0 do have some serious concerns. The connection of Riverwood Lane to 92nd will make a major change in the character of the neighborhood thats already there, because of the change in access, Uh, Regardless of whets suppose to happen on ,. ee.'eete, , 92nd, in fact there it a lot of traffic that goes very fast there. The ".. neighhorhood has a lot of very young children, and there is very little , traffic down in the neighborhood that isn't people who live there because ,..:, .,rt, there is no connection, its not on -the—way -to.--anywhemz- If you connect ) Riverwood Lane through your going to open that up very easily to allow the traffic to coming out of Cook Park . . . . . . . . drive aroundthe high school. Not e''' :.,,,,ee4' "'"':4:1,:k'*7.14 that I have anything against the High School, I spent the allotted time there ' i;,..,',-',4.4.4.,.: myself and drove around a lot while I was doing it But 1 have same very .,A...,,,, real concerns with Riverwood Lane being connected. The second thing is that, ir . . L where it connect on 92nd, uh, I'm familiar with 92nd in that strip, and, I .. . ,.: 4 don't think thats going to be a good intersection. R :cause of the nature of Pe -'..,e,',',..:`',e the traffic on 92nd. I've find it hard to envision a connection there that ,.., 'i '... going be safe, And those two concerns are very real to me. Thai rest of it , D. ..• r, , ...., seems fine. The encroachment on the flood plain is as was mentioned is fence .1 and lawn. It makes a lot more sense to do ilt that way than to make it all e - v.,— , ie twisty and turn . . . ,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . doesn't do anybody any good. But I think , . , that, I mean, my feeling is / think that maybe the developer needs to go back, „1 ... „ ....i. L, get together-with the peoplw in the neighborhood and work out some way- to meet , the conceiri - of 'Ale traffic, Uh,- becuse- as 1 say, I think it make a '?r, 0 substantil difference in character-of that neighborhood. ., , ILI jit 4"; Moen, "Commissioner Leverett?" - - ,...4 _ ' Leverett, "Well, , , , . . , . , It appears to meet all the criteria. I also have ? concerns for the intersection, I don't exactly see any way of . . . . . . . I don't , know what the speed limit is, but I know theres some pretty fast traffic -, m _ . _ '1 - - 1 t i . 11'4'4 .,■' t TPANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAND 8 1-86 Page 13 .:. .. ...4.. , , '. ''...-. ,,,, .., , ',' ,,,,,',1", ,.'* -*,:. , 4 ,...L ' "*.,' t" "4'1" ;,.1' ',7,,,,. , , ,,,,.,. , 4 „, .. .,,.: 1,',.. .1.i. i, ,/..'4 7--": 4,, ',i.,..:t.,..-, ''''...::L''''''■ 4'',",, " ,,:.:',"r:*,'Y.:Z., ."l i r 1.91 ' coming down 92nd. 1 re 1 y don' t kriuw how to deo) with . . , . cu l--dc�_.sa, f.,. i-t1`,r� from then other way. , . . . , . . . Lt meet�t all the criteria, I guess chats my ,5,. 4 only cony Qr n and 1: don' know how to deal with any suggestions "1"~ '. ,- `' Moen, "Staff the applicant mentioned this tract "A", does staff have a g property . 7 don't quite TM*=; „ � r, problem with making tract "A" an access to the ° .. ' ,e ,,`- understand . . . . Well, you.,-.hade_a-epr_.ablem...+ ith the fact that River�wood would continue across to something. Right7 - . _ *' e `' Newtons "Yee." ek ; t 4YJ" .,y�'+ +:j °; Moen, "And you where saying that something should be done with lot. 17, 18, - ,' �. 4 vt 1�'w '• ' r; to allow for that." , `J tk1, � �a :, t '' `r« it as Newton, "Well, noelmans the concern This may not dnecessarily deadlock the best option. If treat y x ` could get a offset of, according to Randy Cl ►rno of the Engineering division, 1' ,' ,:Kit,e� e. of at least 300 feet, or about 300 feet, that wouldn't be as major of a p; concern. " r;i i er ,:.°„:..e.' ': Moen, "Right, but we're talking hero of a offset of only 150 feet. ; ',,el , '', Newton, "My suggestion, I guess, on that, since I don't have a map that deals :ke x w y = .fir. with that whole area, is to tie it up I think the suggestion I ° . 7,,e„.,„..,,� I would, have too, would be, if you do decide to adopt the condition on, the ,,.* , ... traffic study that you have the applicant look at 92nd and. ways to mitigate `, 7c , turning from 92nd onto Riverwood Lane. several talking �," ' I `,N': Moen "Newman?" ,. r ;�`, G+i:i:jy+ , ,�. ',.,*t .a Newman, Uh, If, if the recommendation from traffic was that lot 16 only be '� {N accessed ,from Riverwood, m guess is that partly because of t++{Y r ' .7 the steepnei of " r � � xY or the street. ,�y,,' ` rY+ Moen, "Plus the fact that 92nd is a minor collector." , =A F '° r 'Newton, ''But then so is Riverl?Jood, I might add." �' Y, a ."1 . . . . , . . . .several people talking . . . . ,yi d Y «i' tr ex i{ Newman, "What about lots 17 and 10, whores there access? I mean 92nd is . 4 rQ still 92nd, ki , . , . . several le talking g . . . t; Some one from audience asked if Commissioner could please speak up. ,' t1 ° • Moen "I',11 try talking louder. laughter. . . F; In '� Newton, ''I don't see anything in the actual conditions. " s° { Sutler, ''Remember when I asked you in the very beginning about that? Engineering Department had a concerned with it and it hasn't really been .. addressed. w ;1';'1.::::;,„:,:,„::1, `TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & LCAND S 1-86 Pane 14 ,. k r F ' n , -- v:_ r..r.:i J lY _ '✓iu f rt-x4 IF-1_,xf ur.; „r x�l�w a t,. t+y, 1�'+ ,,tFY$I ry lµe - �' :.,��fi,j t J441 . .:W,:: , it..,..{s,. _.,»wy.t,`'wi i4; Newton, "Right, its not tested as fort!, of the conditions 40 1 ". - Moen, "I guess I would like to take this opportunity to make a couple of ,,, comments. Uh, I, we have a responsibility to the whole neighborhood to provide access for emergency vehicles and a lot of other things, we try to cut -.: ; down on the number of cul-de-sacs, if at all possible. 1 can understand the neighbors concerns, „based on the that this is Cook park, but I think that .'-,' .,,.� . .� ,, ._ the overriding concern is that we need the access from emergency uvchi"cue ---- `- '; " standpoint. One other comment I would make is, requiring the developer to put sidewalks down the length of 92nd, basically on both side, uh, would have a -; strong benefit for the public, in terms of access, for example between the soccer fields . . . . seen people walk up and down that all the time, and it is y a problem. With that I would like to see some condition -4,44,4: on lot 17 and 18 to be there approval to be reserved until such time that the . traffic study shows that we don't have a problem with connecting up I - ' think Chats a good idea Traffic study should find ways , .4,::. to mitigate the impact on Riverwood Lane. 1 think �' that the item on lot 7 and 0, should be restricted to access on one public , roadway, rah, the same roadway." ' M, w Newton, So you•would like to see it on Riverwood Lane." Moen, y�ry "I think it ought to be Riverwood Lane. I guess what we need is a . t motion. , • talking among Commissioner-snot transcriable. . Newton, The traffic study is going to have to be approved by, realistically r 'd by the Engineering Division before they record the plat. uh, you know they • a . will have to have gone thru public improvement drawings and all that, Do you have a problem with that. • several people talking . . • . . . . _. ., ,....4.44.-._* .4* " 4.46.4.444,.....__.�:. ..44_ d, Moen, "Commission Sutler would you care to make a motion." Butler, "Yes." • �.; Viµ, Moen, "Your busily scribbling away there, so I going to put you . . Butler, " � _.,pp i ion S 1-86, with the , Yeah X make a motion that we approve Subdivision conditions submitted except those that we are going to change Okay, Number 8 .- we're going to scribble out, and were going to make it "Riverwood Lane will A i � � � connect with Copper Creek_ Development. Now is that clear? Moen, "Is Copper Creek the adjoining development?" /. Butler, yes to, the west, - going to scratch out' ' EU completely _ Nu ber 13•. After the period.nu to the` Engineering� Section period. - - q Then we' ll put uh, Ri a ood lane easterly access shall also be addressed at ' this time, uh', and then, 1 want to say something, I didn't get this far, this . t lots 17 arid 1 platting, , xs where I stopped, you want to address i atting once the A... traffic report is in they can decide whether they want to or not plat 17 and �.y 10 or take Track "A", So somebody can be creative and TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS d, WAND t 1-06 Page lea ,w. p:, l'....:1 .1,111111M11111MBffilalifiellMinagnmomommenur Moc.rt, "Riv rwood Lana. 44Plreet across shall also bf+ z1,,40oss along wi t.h th(c plotting of lots 17 and 18 and Tract "A" 1 . . Y. Butler, "plotting of lots 17 and 18 and Tract ';A", and the dedication of r tract "A" , ` . ,• . J . , .several talking .r Moen, On 11. we would like • Y, Fwewman, "Access onto Riverwood Lane,11 ,.(r• J Butler, "Okay, 7 and 8, Is that how the City has it pianned for Riverwood Lane. Newton, "It doesn't really matter" Moen, "why dory't we just say that they are restricted access one way or the other„'° , . 0 Newton, "They both need to face the same direction,' Butler, Okay, then 11. should be restricted to the same public road, Then . �':, 14. Applicant shall dedicate lands within the lot) year flood plain, except, e 7 L Newman, Can we reword that to .�a,d that an thin south of the rod that is•:: ! not, is not in lots j, 2, aid 3. r, With,. Butler, Right, and get also he will still have to go thru the Sensitive = e. r .. N9 se : , Lands Hearin to get that cle +red,, so them shouldn't be any problem with J that. Because he even though he is going within in that, he won't be building within that, He'll still have to go for a Sensitive Lands, Newton, "Sensitive ve lands only goes for any kind of development, .;+ digging one s°oexvel, of dart is." ent �f ,.�-� +•: : the lot i s no., development, gg hY • ,.w "Butler, "Okay," Newton, "Steep slopes, drainageways, doesn't matter what it is, sewer line drainage," u ` Butler, "Some of it is." Cia . Newton. "Yes, and thats addressed to.io , . . .,several talking. . On ' � have any more that except to include that . �; � Butler, - that I di.dn-�. h�v d � Other i;han the staff prepare the final order and President Moen sign- off on that final order. - Moen, "We have a motion, do we have a second." • • Commissioner Peterson, Second, 1 TRANSCF/IPT LINCOLN SAVINGS ,1. � :� •VINGS & LOANS � i��6 Page 1. i r .. r ♦ w c,•� • Y .�:+ .fit • 1•_ _ • '& . li y ! r+�• aWV t�•• , "- •7,+I`ry`�'�[�k.J�� i r • i - , ' ' r .. . , Moen, rFu r t 4t:,r d s c U,'1J' 1 i q. ,t .'1 '' :i v r o f U-10 mo st rr 5 1 �n i f f b y ,�l r., ; b Crl issJ )rEY' Mon, Butler , )t.l i{ r yir1 ......jr:) k1: r"t�i1t�4nrI, 'arid 1.r'V�.+r• '1..t. At,'c1 Moen, "Opposed?" Newman, "Ney." Moen, "We have one in opposition, motion carries five to one, -� :M • • t,.: ,%•:... .::'" :I c r.. y. . rl � , k, b- • , r•. ,*:•• TRANSCRIPT LINCOLN SAVINGS & L �ND S 1 -86 Page 1* , • w . . " '.4 • ..... • ,"•• . • • . . 1.:,.. , ..."• . -,; -".. ..• -,, . ~.: ,• ... 1 ., 0 to . ... . ... 4,44 4 ' 4*. ..'• . TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION :.,.. ;:'• .. . REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 4, 1906 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:33 PM, The meeting was •,.. . held at Fowler Junior High School, 10265 SW Walnut. LGI ROOM. - -. ...' 2. ROLL CALL: President Moen, Commissioners Butler,' Peterson, Bergmann, . , . .... 0 . - . Newman, and Leverett (arrived 7:40). . . . . . . Absent: Commissioners Fyre, Owens, and Vanderwood. , ..'. .,.,;.. ;-.. • . .., .- .. „. Staff: Senior Planner Elizabeth Newton and Secretary Diane M. . ,..- Jelderks. ..... ,-. . '',.. ..i. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • .los . . ■ • , .. Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Newman seconded to approve minutes as submited. Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioner . ...„ • .:,.•,- Bergmann abstafred. ...; -.. ,-- 4. PLANNING conmnsIoN COMMUNICATION President Moen announced that item 5.6 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 1-86, ZONE ....., „., CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 1-86, SUBDIVISION S 4-86 had been withdrawn from .; the agenda. ,:.:, .... . .. . . . - . .... 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS . 1 .. , 5,1 SUBtIVISION S 1-O6 LINCOLN 841triNGS AWO LOAN/KNEE(AND'ESTATES II/ NPO 01 6 4, ,.. • , . . , •''' .., 41 Request to subdivide a 8.68 acre parcel into 18 lots, with a minimum lot 4 4 ' ' •4 j size ot__,tgo s . ft. , on property zoned R-4,5 (Residential 4.5 .. ..4..- - . Unito4cre) OcAted: letween neitgia-lEitgtes and Cook Park, west of , . .. _ . . "- -- - Tigard High Shopi. (291 14A, lot 900) • .•, . 4 ,.. -• r . Senior Planner Newton reviewed the staff report making staff's , . ~.. recommendation for approval, modifying conditions nUmber 8 and 9. ..., APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION EL . Norm Harker, 1750 SW S4yline Blvd, , Portland, representing Lincoln Savings and Loan, agreed with the staff report, He stated they would be willing 69 to dedicate Tract "A" for right-of-way. He requested clarification on , - bonding for streets, if public improvements were limited to lot frontages, t, if builder could determine frontage for condition 11, and if "dedication is OD only limited to land within the 100 year flood plain. Staff responded that public -improvements could be bonded. That the public improvements .. , -II were- required along entire property line not just lot frontages, If the builder determined access one lot could end up one direction and the other lot could face the opposite direction, which is what staff wanted to : avoid, Also, the city had in the past accepted property which was not ,..,. within the 100 year flood plain, '• , .".' . 4 . . . ..' . ••• • ... PLANNING COMMISION M1NO1C11 110ROARY 4 1906 Page I c4,•,„,••••',:-.., . * ' '.., . ' ;- t. '"1 .: , '..•s', -.7:;:',.i. • ,;- . - .i - * -1;\ : , , ' , Ili A ill ,- b NPO COMMENTS ' Senior Planner Newton read into the record a request from NPO / 6 Chairman e ,pp>�y to postpone the hearing to allow for another NPO meeting. PUBLIC TESTIMONY , )' e 0 Guy Mount, 9500 SW Riverwood Lane, requested the people stand and be recognized who where here to support a denial of this application. He , 4 read and submitted a petition, signed by 27 residents. into the record requesting denial of the application, He requested that the meeting be 'sot aside to allow more citizen input. ,, 0 Liz Collins, 16545 SW Copper Creek, President of the Copper Creek Association, also representing residents from Kneeland asked that the , • application be postponed. They understood that Riverwood Lane would be a cul-de-sac. They where concerned about traffic onto 92nd, that traffic from Cook Park would use Riverwood as a shortcut. Discussion followed regarding the 'street connection at 02nd and Riverwood Lane. o Sally Arroyo, 9505 SW Riverwood Lane, adjacent to lot IN 4 was concerned that the existing water and sewer were adequate. She wanted a study of the Sensitive Lands as well as the 100 year flood plain to be maintained. o Dan Lesue, 9540 SW ,'Riverwood Lane, was concerned with the growth and the effect Tigard C ., already it would. have on the h High Schoo 1 enrollment i s y above the `number of students that the school was built for. Ho ' ' '' wee concerned what effect the traffic efou7d have on Riverwood .duria 1, games. Discussion followed regarding the School District not having any • objections. - REBUTTAL J Mr, Harker stated they had neighborhood participation through the NPO +.,. process and they had moved to support the development. he had also offered to meet with other neighbors.. he questioned where people would short cut to from Cook Park, As for the speed on 92nd, that was an enforcement issue s sue and did id riot know now what he as the dee Toper could do, o Discussion followed regarding the Water District response (ro comment was - received), portions of lots 1, 2, and 3, being in the flood pain and what would happen if they were removed. Lengthy discussion regarding the traffic study and connection of SW 92nd y �. and R i.v e reeood Lane, Mr, Newman a-1 commented that he lived at the other end of Rivertrood Lane, PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED _ . o Commissioner Butler had no comment, _ N. PLANNi NG compij ' r'0 oN MI Nil 1»I 1'C liRUArty 4 , 1 06 Pagel 'fly A N"b t . . . . :-...- ......, . 410 0 , • ,■,.. . i. .' : -- . . . o Commissioner Peterson was concerned with traffic if Riverwood was made a . through street - . - . . , ' , - 0 . Commissioner Bergmann, felt the two lots with double access should both eo front on Riverwood Lane. He had no problem with lots 1, 2, & 3 encroaching into the flood plain. Lengthy discuss/oh followed regarding -, striking conditions numbers 0 and 9. ei =IJ •• ,.. ' s „...es... . .' o Commissioner Newman felt the connection at 92nd and Riverwood would be a • •6 ••,.• major change to the character of the development and was concerned because .. s . . . of the number of young children in the neighborhood. He was concerned # . where the connection would be made onto 92nd for safety reasons. He supported having the proposal go back to the NPO .. . a *; .., . • • '.' I 0* . o Commissioner Leverett felt the criteria had been met and was concerned . ,. • '''.. with the 92nd connection, but not sure how to deal with it. .., le Commissioner Moen asked about dedication of Tract "A" and the problem with . ee access. Lengthy discussion followed. Commissioner Moen felt it was the s° reeponsibilits of the entire neighborhood to cut down on cul-de-sacs. e . ■ I. , ' because of the access for emergency vehicles. He felt sidewalks on 92nd . . . would be a benefit. Further discussion on a traffic study. . Commissioner Butler moved and Commiesioner Peterson seconded to approve S ie ljek 1-861 modifying condition number 8 to read: SW Riverwood Lane will connect Riverwood Lane with the development to the west (Copper Creek) s Eliminate condition number 9. modify condition nue:ear li to read: Double :- frontage lots, namely # 7 and 8, shall be restricted to access the sr.me I^: v ., public roadway/. Modify condition number 12. to add: The Riverwo04 . .. .-. easterly access to be addressed after the traffic study; also lots 17 and e . . 18 be platted and that Tract "A".be.dedicated to City once the traffic . - . . _ study had been done. Modify condition number 14. lby adding "wed property south of the road not platted into lots 1, 2 and 3," . , request staff to prepare the final order and for Oresident MOM, to sign 4; . . ,„, • • 7if . that final order, . --• , - ' '.:'' sr - - • . Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioner Newman voting no . • , . 5.2 SUBDIVISION S 2-86 VARIANCE V 1-86 ELIZABETH BUTLER/SAMUEL GOITER NPO ft 6 . al. ,. Renuest to subdivide a 1.37 a re parcel into 7 lots, minimum lot size 7500 I.. . sq, ft. ; and for a Variance to allow a 600 ft. long .cul-de-sac whore 400 OD . ft. is required, on property zoned R-4,5 (Residentia/ 4.5 units/acre) , .. Located: 335' west of SW -93rd and SW Inez (WCTM 2S1 118A lot 1400). se . .: 14 z . . Senior Planner Newton reviewed the staff report noting the concerns -. . 4 0 ,11 regarding the cul-de-sac versus a through street; the problem with the 1 ', sire of the lots, the need for a tree cutting spermit, the bike path and made staff's recommendation for approval with 13 conditions. ', . - - - • , NPO COMMENTS . s , Senior Planner Newtoe read a letter into the r000est from NPO # 6 Chairmmi ,. • =,.,'....rkr.,.. . recommending denial and that the applieation be returned to the NPO li he •,. .,- - reviewed by the confAirnedsseighbors , . - .. ., ,, . _„.,• i t4 ' m PLANNING OOMMISS1ON MIN0111 ( FURUARY 4 1986 Peqo 3 ' • -4 „ .. • . . , p 0 awl°. a- . ,a,....:.,,,,,,, , ...,„4,,,,,,;,, ,. ,..„,..,..,.... ., .,,..,,,., .. ,... ., a • ..;:.-:',` ''-. • .1/go 77,1 u Li :., ( AM)oL.. ' f / 4 1 t;t4let. 1,14,044aL -90/ i -, nu14/1 . .:„1 .1. : e -i ✓ • 0 7/1e- Fii1owi'nj 'rf 0 Afil ' 1 if, fiit• Wa5 . � ' • .I , 4 .. .,.: .. Afi e ` / � I 0 ideç V ro A ' f A/0 r Pi', e A v b11,3 107 .-ae: , : . am hi/1j :Pro"0 e45 /4'r '-lie po . .., s ,,,f.. ,:.,...... : :2.) iit,NII ! , 5 e4,44,,,, ,A /1,, . ,.,,.... ,. ..... „. ,, v - ..,„i,. �p tritallwr ' '' 4? C1411 • 9 1 a „ ,1 „c)e,r .at,11 OC, :...,.., .......... .....,.....:,.. , .. r.;.,' ( . i -.: rierettpe-.1",••• . (3, f stt 404 .. 'T.4".” a ',"..-; 0' .i ' /111 1 . ••• . . ., . ) 1 do, 1.-,, . .0# - litift4,,,) i s-,, -.!'..---7.-, '.. . 7€ , . 3 OPICE,• LL " &r4i - W C. )e1giop/riLrr o Sao $431 ' / NtL .,, eel iseVa . , •...i ''''':' IT n GG . `,- �,G'.e. -�,-i.-�� fief, II ..'. al 1. ; g . 1 ' Lki - - - - . r /1,1\)/1,1,i; ". -7CI <-, : %. /.7? . ,) .- S ' ? 1'4 3 a (1 ,4',..?) ‘04.4i. ,i) - - ,l t 14 ri ... i .„,-,- "e7 .,„....-- ' ,.. -t,_ .-- /i: Y `.7‘n • ` M J /61(c-.5 • ' 97 ' ill '''' $.2.1 - .4.1 4"sI , 's . • •i w . . ..r 4 ,----z,-. ' op, i .)6,t.„4_,..... irsts,,iL,,,,..,d...N.3 ,....:, 1 r.:." s L.--‘ c"........H.,i j ii„.„,i, , . 1 t,,.-. ,1 -1)j,,,, , , 1� J�f a' J a, 0 0 •A .' 1 ;a y • A_ A 1 ° .--71 4 , ' ;'-' 9� �,A ' J w A'JJ'-f '`,45c7 (..) E-•h---22-..........__... N ,: w. .i 1a-'t ' ° 0,./LA...d 1) '1 `I 61`el i . a w✓' , ) ,. I `1 4)c M ' rJS )G) Si vl /cr cl at:a1,.'o.c+[,1 %.ek!u'� , ��a • '• ..- r-''% ' ' "0....-"-• —. I r7,22/ A Ifrw. )1 A l r, 1'IC •t/ ,y il. , .. . , ,,,t. .. ,, lig • . • • o ; . .4( ,, .,, —r q77e., 54,,,/ EW u.JA,‘. ii,l, Ibd:/4/45:5a.,) (1449/9Cie Ce--& • • / r / mi.,.` � 4 1 .'�. ;2,3 ^ / 4 $ ' /mot' .."1— x` 34c.) L ex• ✓ 02,., . : d-i-• 1 ia,fict c , ( (..Lz,(,.u.si , -, / „ sloe) ,:-...)4,3 .4c .i.,L. ...t.u%e .42 , 6- _. ., _ 67 . 1 . 45-.7 0 S'4... ,ir,','+„,f i,,,-'6%,,..,..„,,„.1/. (:,.,6...--,,—.4Z „.,, 4 \ 2. So I al. ,_ C CA le".(.1 i kt•d___2._ • ��. C: Jr' j ,/�" ,f^-•- , r �1 r ,1r/(ice -,e d,r ii c. '"7, 1-1`1`LI....\(''. A('1/4•■••• L-.,4.**/ I.:::', .r,./,....,, . �1 0 'ii t; a Fa.r,N•k 1 , a , a d • ,.. - NOV ___-- , . - iiimpl,..... 410 4 . . , I . . , , Febuary 4, 1986 • Tigard Planning Commission Fowler Junior High School-LGI 1. ,. 10865 SW Walnut Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Agenda Item 5.1 . . '.017 Subdivision S l3 t. 4 1 , ... ,-*k , Cn behalf of the homeowners of Copper Creek Development it is our ,e ' , desire to address the staff report regarding issues which have .,-.. : . , been raised. We are unable to support any development in the ,.. proposed area until specific issues are clarified and expanded .',.. - upon. . . . - 4 = SECTION B: Findings and Conclusions : - - Sub Section A: Surrounding property owners were not given notice prior to the NPO 46 meetings As owners we were not given any . . opportunity to consult with the NPO concerning how, and by what process the NPO deals such issues. 0 - e , . Sub Section C. Section C states Policy 3.2.1® will. be satisfied - . . , . because development within the 100 year flood plain will be avoided." After reviewing the proposed site map it appears at least lots 112gand 3 will directly be within the 100 year flood .• . , plain. These inconsistences are at best confusing. - , Sub Section E: Sect ion E states °Policy 7.3.1. and 7.4.4. are satisfied because adequate water and sewer facilities are aVailable to the development. Question: Has the developer had - ' - any studies done to show what the impact of the proposed water , and sewage facilities will do to the existing supplies of Copper Creek? . es # :- 1- SECTION C: Recomendations 1 . Sub Section 8 ,.nd 9: Both sections indicate the potential of having a turn-a-round/one (1' ) foot reserve strip at the end of Riverwood Lane in the event Riverwood does not continue/connect a. at the western section o The proposed site map as well as the .., . Et developers application indicate that Riverwood Lane and 92nd will 69 be "pushed through" and connected. As Homeowners we are very " e. confused as to which is being proposed--connected or not ! connected. .. :I . - - - - - - - .. ram Sub Section 13: It is the Homeowners extreme concern that...the - 1 0 LU ' - increased traffic flow from Cook Park could be a very teal m -.I problem. Cars will reach speeds of 60+ miles per hour on 92nd at - - times. In the event Riverwood Lane is connected with 92nd the potential for traffic fatalities involving children could be .4 enormous. The upper portion of 92nd immediately above the 1 . . . 4 V. . . ' b ' A ' . ^ ', proposed development is a blind hill. The potential of cars coming over that "blind hill" at excessive speeds down into Cook Park again causes the existing Homeowners grave concern.�d .ht , We again wish to state we are not in favor of the proposed ":' development as it stands today,. Fe are very concerned that specific issues have not been discussed and or have been confused °;_ ._ ,► ,. simplified. It is our desire that befo e` any further i and over sip lif f ,. . action is taken on this matter we the Homeowners of Copper Creek ": r: as well as other adjacent landowners affec" Nd have the 1,7 opportunity to meet with the developer ir ,.on junction with the discuss specifies in greater detail before any plan is ....-, .4.,, -.. brought before Tigard Planrtn Commission ,4 ' . .? g Tigard g ,r' L- - Respectively Submitted, . - ,,..„ • i 4/- 9 4.,,,,,,0.. - . , „, • . :••• ,.•k. . et4itilow—• 1 244" 4°‘1,, 1.' . w i Concerned Citizens of Ca►p .s x Creek i N 1 Y .': 0,w o i y .. , - - .. (. P. ;f r i ,., '! K ,._. • Y � y ,p L + t w . ! f r . -ba n� om - 7 ' � 6 t , ' s + � 'i,G 4• • •' t'. + +.1, .} a . e B • r 7 . 0 0 it'il , :. TO: Tigard Planning Commission February 3, 1986 »r FROM Phil. Pasteris Chairmen NPO # 6 .. 'SUB.lECTr Recommendation for denial and referral to NP 9 # ,6: Application 4I S, 2-486 & V 1-86 Samual A Dotter III .;' ' (WCTM 281 11BA lot 140) ;,..�. ., Application # S 1-86 Lincoln Savings & Loan ' WCTM 2S 1 14A lot 900) a The NPC 11,i 6 ch irman has received numerous calls from residents concerned "Y.' about the above referenced applications. These calls resulted from the .. City of Tigard Public Hearing notice being given after the NPO meeting ,. i Y, which addressed these applications. It is clear to me as Chairman that k :, due to notification timing the NPO lacked the input required to make an K ' , ,, informed decision. . ' ' *--ot Subsequent to the NPO meeting, the chairman has met with these residents a `. and has determined that they have a sincere interest in the planning process and are willing to work With the developer and the NPO In resolving their concerns. • u h , •M Therefore, I am asking the Commission to 1) deny both applications and 2) recommend the develoi ers and citizens meet with NPO #1 6 on February 19, Y p a .+3 . •.. `Q i 1986, to review the proposed developments. /.., 4 , ' f , 1 Yip' ,- , 6,..y ... L''''*?L.,.); , '. . ., psi lir ,.. , ,, 4,.....,.. .), ,..-, 1 r :‹: -. .4 NOTICE; ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN TUEik UAW-. nd note their address on this sheet. (Please Print your name) RAD ,9OOQ E 5'S ITEM,t ESCRIP`T�OW: '<.": ...'t 5 1 �� }�-...,,,L,...._j.:,_____s_,__. ,, ......, , s, . • :,.:Y .-.i,, ,,, 1 c.„ '',/jelvp,_//c.:._. P ROPOTUENT (For) OPPONENT (against) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation 4•. t - Iv 9SUG S V r'1/6-re.. M . bl a d ji.. , L t,4,,p,14 7 G 'Gd..0 li 0 i/is f. Ti�C'l / , sc s S1L 1 r,.Ai,,�{ C Nom- G� ..1 .Y r 41 f - - , a// ' a ' ' 1 . . .. . � is - , 4 .0 // ,.., . ,:.- . .. . ,evexAre7, . .0„E...211,/.21_44: , wi.wemz, greet- . w • le I • .•• " ',•.; • A », - •. + 60 • y A` p� ', , ELI II �. • . .4 4. t.' ... tl y'.. .. . ..„ . ;,.,- FlCiLNUN 1 1 t M (:), 1 FEBRUARY 4, 1986 .. 7: 30 P.M, TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI 1. ,. 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON 97223 p e • , -- A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Subdivision S 1-8 REQUEST: To divide 8,68 a: rEs into 18 lots with a minimr;ifi� size of \` ,�. • 7,500 square feet COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential .., ZONING•DESIGNATION R-45 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre) ,e' APPLICANT: Lincoln Savings and Loan OWNER: SAME 10250 SW Greenburg Road a Portland, OR 97223 . LOCATION: West of 92nd Avenue between Kneeland Estates 14io. II and Cook Park uF '' 2. C^. E2gDtA { • Preliminary plat approval was granted in 1981 (S 11-80/CPR 12-81) for 22 attached and 5 detached single family residential lots. The final plat ' " • ': was never recorded and the approval it has expired. + a 1r 3 . Vicinity Information Kneeland Estates No, 2 lies to the north and Tigard High School is i,— northeast on the opposite side of 92ne Avenue. The R-4.5 zone applies to this area. The Copper Creek development which is zoned R-7 (PD) (Residential, 7 units/acre, planned development) lies immediately west and Cook Park abuts the southern boundary of the property, . 4, Site information t; The property is presently undeveloped. The terrain slopes downward from : � north to south with sir°ades of up to -30% in the northern portion of the •- y . OD site, Th The southern half rif the �r°operty- is ii- hin the i00 year flood - plaii - _ - w ' :' , r STAFF R POT`, • S 1-•8t tAGr. • w { L a . .4. • • . . _ .. ■ 0 . 411 • ,. . lhe otpp1i(,0alt. proPo'bo Ir) dividv the propQrty illIu IS sinyle family , ,:- . . , , ,,Idqnti,.01 lots , .d11 with :it minimum si/Q uf 7,500 squarq feot. Riverwood Lane will b extended from its terminus at Copper Creek to . 9:nd Avenue. In addition to Rluerwood Lane, four lots will have frontage on the 93rd Avenue cul—de—sac in Kneeland Estates No II, .11.... — Although this proposal represents a reduction in the number of lots from ...i.-. ' 27 to 18, the subdivision layout and street alignment are very similar : .. to the proposal that was approved in 1991. ' . . 5. AaancLand ND Comments 0 . ,. ,. • The Engineering Division has the foIllowing comments: :* ..,.','.. ' •.,.-', a. Lots 17 and 18 on the east side of 92nd Avenue will preclude the ,• ... . extension of Riverwo(d Lane to the east. The applicant should be - , •., 7...,.- ' . able to show that other reasonable alternatives exist for - .. . - ..• providing access to the property to the east, •:: . . . b, The issue of stormwater runoff presents several problems which - ,-• •: N. . . , must (.3e clarified. Stormwater through "Tract A" from the school property and 92nd Avenue needs to be addressed along with the . . ,. gully through Lots 10, 11, and 12 and the drainage over Lot 8 in .. , the event of a catch basin failure on the 93rd Avenue cul-de-sac. • . , c. A private pond is located above Lot 12. Liability for any , flooding caused by the pond and the right of this owner to release '. . ,., . . water onto Lot 12 is unknown. d. Slope easements along giverwood Lane will be necessary. e. If River-wood Lane does not connect with the completed portion in ..'....',:,."','... Copper Creek, a temporary turn around will be necessary. '..... .. : . , F. Lots 7 and 8 have double frontage and access should be limited to one street. The access for Lot 16 shall be limited to Riverwood , . , - Lane, e.: .....- ' g A traffic report is needod indicating what measures should be 11:: taken to mitigate the site distance limitations at the proposed .,..‘:. .. .. Riverwood Lane/92nd Avenue intersection. , % . h. The applicant must provide stormwater runoff report addressing proposed on and off site stormwater and erosion control during and . ,, OD after construction, -This report must address the impact of . : upstream drainage facilities and the mitigation of adverse stormwater impacts upon City Park and greenway areas , , =4 . OD - _ _ i ,- The 100 year 'flood plaLn should be dedicated to the City as ,.. iu ... - '. .J greenway . . .1 ... . : , -..... :, j , A Sensitive Land Permit will. be necessary for any construction or .2. grading within the flood plain, drainageways, or slopes over 25%. . • A' b k Any reduction in the width of the City's standard street section - - will require the approval of a variance, - - . rilAri RrpoRt 8 1,. 06 pAw, y . • •. . . 4., • .. . 4 0 l'',..... . ' .' . ihe 14J ildil(9 Inspect.,on 011/JsJOn nut th,it thv 5101,,Q1, oo m,Any ,,)! Lif,2 • . \''''''' • lotc, oro ,,Loop .And tho..it dc!velopmont oird moottnij ..;otb,Ar.k'a ,,Ititi ,rd' m,ly ,..- - . be difficult . ....., . , ... . . The Tigard School District and NPO #6 have no objection. . ...• ..-... ...a,4-a:,, No other comments have been received. . . , B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS • .1' '... ^ ,a e* . : a The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan : policies 2, 1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3, 1, 7,4.4, 8,1.1, and 8. 1 ,3 and Community Development Code Chapters 18,50, 18, 160, and 18. 164 , Since . • the Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, the Statewide Planning , Goals and Guidelines no longer need to be addressed. , . .. . •„_ . .. . . The Planning staff concludes that the proposal with minor modifications a . a . , is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based a• , a . , upon the findings noted below: ,...•. . . ,,, . I ..,. , . ... ,. a, Policy 2. 1. 1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of , • .a . a :, ' the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant' s ....' ...aa . proposal. e :..... -.• b. Policy 3. 1, 1 will be satisfied provided that any portions of the Lots which exceed 25% slope are not graded or filled without a ..., „.. Sensitive Lands Permit. :, • • -• c, Policy 3.2. 1 will be satisfied because developme;et within the 100 , .., .., • year flood plain will be avoided. If any of the proposed street•., doer, encroach upon the flood plain, a Sensitive Lands Permit will be required. ..„, d . Policy 7, 1 ,2 can be met when additional information, noted in the Engineering Division comments, is submitted and appropriate mitigation measures taken. e. Policy 7.3.1 and 7,4,4 are satisfied because adequate water and .,". .1 sewer facilities are available to the development. The applicant also indicates that these facilities will be provided within the subdivision as required by the City standards, .•,, ..- 1,.. ,, - f Polity (1. 1 , 1 will be met once the ,termination-of Riverwood Lano ,At. 92nd Avenue is justified or provisions for future extension to the • • 63 , east are made. • ,.. , q, • Policy 8 . 1 ,3 will be satisfied when the eonditiere. or 61ppruy041_ ...,.' l'*olating to street improvements are completed, . . - . _ The Planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with , the relevant portions of the Commuhity Development Code based upon the r i Od i og:3 no(.4.d 1)4'1(P.Al •.. 8rAl.f.- RLpoRI . u i •116 pAGr 1 .-, ...,., . , ., .r - •t• t cal, ch„Ipt.&'f .8,L.:U of ir,o l,,l)do ,:ti :i„At,l :,f ,Qd et.cdu:>Y` this Proof-P.)41 ttieot ., ,a 11 e I th0 r c'qi F , r a rf , a�, Ft ;,n 0•01'141 '_ b, Chapter 18. 160 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets • the requirements set forth for the submission and approval of a . pre l iimnar`y plat.. J,•. Sr ” c C. Chapter 18. 164 of the Code wi/1 be satisfied during the a approval process for the final plat. . • 4. )* C, RECOMMENDATION Eased up:.°n the findings, sand conclusions above, the Planning staff -`' recommends approval of S 1--86 subject to the following conditions . 1 . UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE. MET PRIOR TO :."":. • �;, RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT - 2. Standard half—street and full street improvements including -_• :.' .sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage . - ` `, and utilities (delete inapplicable items) shall be instali<ed along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage: Said improvements along SW 92nd !:a Avenue shall be built to (60' R/W, 36' Pvmt.) City ;standards . including an 8 'r`t walk on the west side and conform to the r:.l ". . , alignment of existing improvements (44' note the attached section which was approved via Kneeland Estates subdivision development). ` ° 3, Seven (7) sets of plan—profile public improvement construction ,,:°.. � ` plans including a site gradlnl p lan and cross sections and one ( ) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered - • Professional Civil. Engineer, detailing all proposed public ; ., . " improvements shall be submitted to the E►;gineering Section for j approval 4 , Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profile details is shal 1, be provided as part of the public improvement plats + .' 5. Slope` easements along SW Riverwood Laing shall bo provided to the , public. Documentatiort shall be on City farms or on the plat and approved by the Engineeeing Section, i i. 1' - 6, The applicant shall provide a storrrwater runc,Cf report addressing proposed onsite and offsite stormwater control and soil erosion `• + orttroI . (during and after construction); said report shall also addeess the impact of upstream drainage foc•i'1'iivies on the site and -; the mitigation of storhWater damage to tfice downslo e City y park & d RA _ rJp ch ItpFAIc ,` lands . ., Cnnstruc.tion or proposed..opust:d publ.i+. i.rttpovc:ttot►nl.t, shall rtrjt, commence .. until after the 4:nyineer ing .',0i Lion has issued approved public, .improvement. plans , The Sections will require posting of a 160% :. .r �' c , payment, of ,=a pert<mt€ foe and a 3 Performance nt�art e bc,�rtd the. a titt�nt �f sign d tn.,Eat 1 la l kon/`s'Lree i i.igh 1. roe ()1St.), (ho t:X0tut. +trt of a ,. + .: , c thstrUctiMrr compliance orp l iancs a g r ,n„ ait shall, occur prior to, or concurrently with the i.ssUat'cC of o o ovt d ta A t. a improvement , THE ENCLOSED 1 ANCOUT GIVING REPI l lF I1�URPA�fun , w- REGARDING FEE SCHE DULES, BONDING AND AOREf4E17S..: f> .,:' `•11'ti I 1■1.Ijt)I 1' • z� 1 86 PAi F: 4 Y f A d. ,. i' . 14 ..',1„.4.1, 11..4 11•i • „ • • • ; ” 6 on0 ( ) root rw.,r110 t" th l f 1P,104ru" .1• L(..! provid t.or NJ', 1:,W RIvftrwepici Le4no, Lf it (low) , • nut (..unnocA with thQ wc-Jtorn sQction uf R!verwood Laine. "' • 9 If applicable, a temporary turn-a-round shall be installed at the p terminus of SW Riverwood Land; said turn-a-round to be approved by the post office, fire department and Engineerin -Section. The •„ • turn-a-round shall be removed, if deemed, necessary by the City .' Engineer, at the applicants expense. A bond shall be posted with the City to assure future compliance,. 10, Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet • from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by Washington County. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved bj the Engineering Section. DEDICATION roRms AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED, I, 11 , Double frontage lots, namely # 7 and 8, shall be restricted to .access to only one public roadway , 12, Lot #16 shall only have direct access onto SW Riverwood Lane, 13. The applicant shall provide a traffic report indicating measures to be applied o mitigate sight distance concerns, at the intersection of Riverwood Lane and 92nd Avenue, to the Engineering 14. The applicant shall dedicate lands within the 100 year floodplain for greenway purposes. 15. Street Centerline Monumentation 7 . , a, In accordance with ORS 92,060 subsection (2), the centerlines of all street and roadway rights-of-way shall be • monumented before the City shall accept a street improvement, b, All centerline monuments shall be placed in a monument bog comformin(2 to City standards, and the top of all monument boxes shall be set at design finish grade of said street or roadway, c., mew The following certter'l,int? n)on,.05trits shall, be set: OY! 1) All conterlino-centerline intersectiohs . 4 ; IntersocLions 1:reNtod with "co4tector" or . oIher on , existiny stroolli- shall he set when the centerline . ali4nMent of said "coliectdr" or ,dther street has been ostabiished by jr for the City : 2) Center of all Cu]-d0, sacS; 1.• ' a . •19 • " • ( I I i'?C:P()R1 r.4 -81t1 Prit;1 I) (:ur•v4b ptrj *,, pr,I nt,5 of I t•xt.C'r St+r t,tram (t' l ! who" {,hurl r pfUsLt,,iuirt fsxI1'3 iris i.43(!. t.tstt 1 lull t 4)1 ±.t,,A 1..,,,u4,1 ,•r1h othert.Ji %0 i,, ,gi.nni.ny and ending points (U.0 rid f •,, ) % /..,,,./... / ) All sanitary and stor;,; location shall be placed .iet r positions that do net interfere with centerline ~iFr ^° monumentationt, r.;! • • 16 A Sensitive Lands Permit shall be required for any encroachment ' Ar. ... into the 100 year, fl.00dplain or construction in drainageways or slopes over 25%. 17, Lot 12 shall, be subject to the setback and h eight r;ruir•enments for ',. . flag •lois contained in Sections 18,96♦090 and 18.98 of the Code, ,- .').,...-7 j 18. A tree cutting pn,!rmit shall be obtained from the City prior to removing any trees over 6 inches in diameter. •1 r~' 19 After review and a > rov ` .• �p 3. by trtt�. Planning t7 I.r•€.0 t;r,�r• and City { Engineer, the Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington County . • • • 20, This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below, M, p/r H, 1,r U.'/) PPEPARE© BY: keith Lids., APPROVED BY William A Monahan Y,• Senior Pl ner Director of Planning & ,- ,, Development ry A' `. (KSLtbs87) • • ( .y 1 • 'O0! J " ♦ • KNEE LAND ESTATES III r. APPLICANT STATEMENT Kneeland Est tes III was giveo preliminary approval for a subdivision 'd in 1981. The approval was for a combination of e . A.:Ltached and 5 detaches single family lots. A 'final plat and constro,.tion plan were completed but the project was not completed because of the change i n economy. t.y present proposal i s to : ubdi „%ode the property into 18 ai ngl e The • family lots. The present zoning is P 4-5. The proposed project will e comply with the rc:dui rements d•or this zone. The minimum lot size is 7,500 square feet. v",r The proposed bd l ei sf on abuts Kneeland Estates No. 2 to the north d M• •y 4 . y This project will complete the cul-de-see on SW 93rd Avenue. Copper Creek Stage 3 subdivision lies to the west of this property. The roadway construction will complete Riverwood Lane out to S.W. 92nd '° 5 1' Avenues, thus improving the tra•Flic circulation for the area. The property slopes- from north to south. Slopes up to 30% exist in m .- the the northern portion of the site. The southern one half of the 1' fte property is within the 100 year flood pl an and is proposed to be left y�. in its natural state. •. • 4 Water is available in SW 92nd Avenue and S W Riverwood Lane. Sanitary sewer is available +ram a line running south t eoi,'eh the project frrem .w W Kneeland Estates 2. Storm •dr cni n.ege will include collecting drainage • . • from the north as well as the site. The storm drainage will be carried to the riatura: drainaQeway running through the site. ; e) x' • • • • • • • • • • 1.. i • 4 ..... r. . . I 2 1:: ,..FFIDAVIT or M.AILZ1W - d• aM1. r., &r • STATE OF OP.GCO 1 - • County of Washington r. City .of Tigard I Ll r , being first duly sworn, on oath depose +• .;:nd sate'''. / Please' Print)• .., . That I am a ,i, ; ' ' if ,Ofil for The City of Z,„44,A ,' Oregon. That I served notice of Public Nearing for Tigard Planning Commission. :-' ;•• ..,• which attached i co py (Marked Exhibit A) von each of the following " named persons on the �. day of �/ fl9� , by mailing to , each of them at the address shown on t :.. attache1. •` r ( list Marked l�schibat ®), ,•°. said notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United States Mail on the 1.98 , postage prepaid. day of • , . .. . .. •{. .... :7 Ai∎. .r..;,.^ia� ,AS% 4.14fr3fi .r'.p f y i,�t.T :i- t..',t. .1 { L L•. tJ'lt: { ::• .t •' r i•. • ',Ii-,:;1" tai.!i � 1• . A .sue/r Sig 'tease/ r / Or ' Person who deli-Bred to POST OFFICE \ MY , -..ri° Subscribed and sworn o before me on the .�s ,�.,�.;� day o> 198 r „ { ;\ � it' . , ■ , NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON Ull It 'My Commission Expires " - .f .. (0257P) Y J. • ,•, `ice vW ' 0 ,41) . C , i 0 r 4 NOTICE OF PUBL I C HEARING :.u. wb• °'K,. Notice is hereby given that the Tigard Planning Commission, at its meeting on lecture they Tuesday, Februaty �� . at 7..a0 ___ �'•M, k% room of Fowler Junior High School,10865 S.W. i Ln4 t Street, Tigard, Oregon, will consider the following application: . v , ., FILE • V11•BERO S 1-86 .. APPLICANT: Lincoln Savings & Loan OWNER: Same { 10250 SW Greenburg Rd Portland, OR 97223 II .� REQUEST: To subdivide u $.6$ acre parcel. into 18 lots, with a Y.. - minimum lot size of 7,500 sq. ft. , on property zoned •i R-4.5 (Residential 4.5 units/acre) p LOCATION: Between Kneeland Estates and Cook Park, west of Tigard ., » High School (WCTM 2S1 14A lot 900) a (See map on revers side) 04 The public hearing on this matter will vv conducted in accordance with the ;},,Y rules of Cha ter 18 32 of the Communit...� Develo agent Code and rul+bs of :; p � y P y procedure of the Planning Commission, Any Persons interest in this CO ' {{{Jjjj n s �av i n ... ,initial.. ' .....; '� ,.. . matter may attend and be heard or LesCLmon m�. be subm�,tCed in writing to be ,•; at : entered into the record of the hearing H K * : act the Planning Dep,trtment at 639-4171 h;~ rmat�on plaa�.e coot + For further information - - �;. TIGARD) CITY HALL, .x2755 S.W. Ash Avenue (Corner of Ash Abenue & Burnham ._. � Street), or contact your Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) # 6 . Chairperson Phil Pa3teris ,i,,,_ : Phone t1amber 4 639-2342 (pm/0257P) itr k •a e -2.--_, ,.d. a .. i h/ , 1, A .. « �. MO 0.2 .k�/�; SY,�. 71«r tt, J.i h7' ':•f 1J YL. f°vfi%, vL '}i "ts Cf.a 19'� liWili /y p�.. 1 - ++ p1 i,, `2 •- r r.{ ^(-T(---r-'-� t- I ,, ..1 r... '''.,,,-r,,- - .n;Tr —t r'3' r 1 t+ rrI; • ',7-„,,„ ,,. • ... J 11, 4. t_{ ' .',-{1 4l• ;�--I .. .1.,,'.,,�V r►..A.7 't h 7�.:.J r_�i I.. 4 * -1 •11l 1 I j r '.'►, 1 �C ,,y t r ` . �I'1 ryr , •.%: . 1 41 1 i I_ ■ ,Tit 1, .. �r`err ` r '! i`� /r/ <1. \ �1 . Ala •17-r Tip F•..! ;; V.L . •, (-� —j L. , t''1.1.f ' V �1 Mi{�1rM + • p 1 j1.01{. J . . 1 ,.I R r; ✓j f *`�( .�._� _. _ v ....1,2 I I. tr.3., ...i, ,)ii'Vl .ice�� 1. ,>•'_"S►i.4T-nso r � '� i 144 11�,1., /,� rwi 01',� J ..,r.t t �1 r }'tit' y 1.„ {,It,,,, , . .,., ,' a I, I 1 F-i Qi ';',$",'-I \, wo l7 k�•rrKq t�� . r )Z!)' lY! it �.C, Pt -'j�•`I•l"+ v N '1 Ly rNl • ' -��cJ.yJS {.�'l._ i i. t1 7 '•hYt 1r' r �7 1 t I ��I (. ,.P ,I 1 l,Y'i r1 � j , 1 (� _._,,.._....I ! r ! s .s k c,.. rq•i { NiAlf.• • 1 ii�„r.• ii L''j 1 I .'i`.O 1 ,. 1 nJ.'�i`{q'•,• •1`! • :,I 71.-.11- I' r,._, , 1► It -, i ,,, •q • , 1 r',41.4 i ,rr •, _ •rN'Yr.141.1... . •�. ., . • • . r. ' ■ r .. . •••41,7•■ ••••••• ..........44.... . .4 i'lj) ,1.,' lirwbt (mk Is ..„ i , .11' . .r. KrleE lt„nd Estates III ' liZZL6 'JO ime61.1 ,:. • ., Clark Lincoln Savings and Loan iaAV puz6 tiSut S8 91 .:. ":. Harold and Edith P.O. Box 23457 ' Ugat S .,100 pug II seaxna .:-., 9410 S.W. Millen Drive Portland, Or . '.'.'. Tigard, Or 97224 97223 a ... , . , . crt,...,.....„.„ Custom Homes by Dave English I..• ■•ta ' r V i. q• . .... ..., Rt. 3, Box 253 Joar I ...'„:',. Newberg, Or 16493 SW 93rd ' . 97132 Ti ard, Or 97223 '. ilIZZL6 JO ' PJWOLL '", 4 NVO A.An;u00 MS '.,.. It, 1 erd Wf3JVW , Kelsay Manning ! , Josime , .-. Clifford and Phyllis Patrick and Mary L. 9580 SW Riverwood Lane 9560 SW Riverwood Lane .... Tigard, Or 97223 ,..',.1. Tigard,Or 97223 fair.d.6 JO 413-4105T.I. ' . , . A2 4-113 Jed003 MS 0229T .. . . '0 AurN paw e usA1104S - KellY Mount L Mark B. dmd Sail E. Buy III and Diana L. 9520 SW Riverwood Lane 9500 SW Riverwood Lane . ' A4Jno3 .. .....-, Tigard, Or 97224 Ti,gard,Or 97224 ; tr446 Jo dpJx91511 . , uslipormJimATU M5 G026 •- „ • .. , uts0 Puy? . ... TUnlatin Development Mint He m Inc. AliwS 4419q0U .,'.;4 , altiatainotke 15300 SW 116th Ave. 16690. S' alenntoodd Ct. I , ,10,. , -•• • . 1 Tigard, Or ' Lake Oswego, Or q7o3V . . 97223 • - ., 4000 • , ' , grettii j0 'P-0U ..,. 1.440 itgliuttp.4 MS S26L UAltd.ala puw es taTUci Baque PeterSon ,.., . .. . ,.... Fred M. and Danat Lynn Terry and Barbara , v.: aTtogi .- ,.. , 16540 SW Cooper cek De. 16520 SW Copper Cr'ttt Dr. Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 .1,... 1 1 2EZL6 JO dP-45T.I. . ,...- 7 : 0,4E6 MS 0ZG9T - ...; . .:. Kamada . 4 Kirk aU$4m$JA pis* *MI Daniel Ken and Mario Kenneth H. votwoH '...,. ' 9530 SW Milion DriVe 9$10 SW Millen Drive . Tigard, Or 97224 TiObrdi Or .547224 . 61Z46 JO 'PLI*14.10d i 1 . 1 s1wo3 W20114tV'41 Puto 1.004104S .. bougall ,.... . . .... ....., ' Loren arid Connie John and Marilyn . . .... . . . . .,... 16500 SW 93rd AVil 10180 SW Laurol . . . . . Tigard,Or 97224 . Batvortom-Or T1005 P : t toZZL6 .10412.00611 , " 4 ,., 4A!":9:1:-=.111WMIt;1tt 1 tit.4.4110AtiN , , :'....: Tigatod School District 23J 131:0 8W Pcific Hwy Tigatre Or. 01224 1 1 , r ■ , , I ■ ' .I , .. • •,..,,, i .. ::,,..... to Os' . .. — 0 /.... .- . . . ..,"• t" MEMORANDUM ...„.,„!...,.P. - . , CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON .... , . . 4 --., ' .,. .• ,.... . ... .-. ,• - , .2. . . . , - TO: Members of City Council iiiiltCr April 3, 1986 I.. ,- FROM: Randy Wooley, City Engileer ... - SUBJECT: proposed Plat of Kneeland Estates III ... .„,....... ....) . - . . In discussions regarding the proposed plat of Kneeland Estates III, several concerns have been raised regarding traffic and streets. used on my research and on discussions at the April 2, 1986 meeting of NPO #6, t have the • - following comments: ..- ' ..% 1. There is a great deed of concern about vehicles traveling at excessive - ' speeds on SW 92nd Avenue between the High School and Cook Park, This ,. ,. --\ ;: - :- is apparently an existing problem, not related to the subdivision, It ,...7 appears to me that this is a traffic engineering problem which we . should address this summer as a City problem, rather than as a ' subdivision condition. . . , • . 2. There is a great deal of concern about through traffic on nstighborhood ....-,- ....-. a streets. Of special concern is the Comprehensive Plan designation of Riverwood Lane as a minor collector connection between SW 9and Avenue ., ..... ' .. . and SW 108th Avenue. •, I feel that it is a valid concern. Therefore, I recommend a review of - .. this portion of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map for possible ..... amendment. The review needs to be initiated promptly, as several developments are contemplated in the area in the near future. . 8. There was a question whether Riverwood Lane should be extended east of ' IL • .... .',1A1 92nd. Review shows that such an extension would require substantial - : . ac fill in the floodplain and wetlands areas. A better location for an - 1.- to) eastward access road appears to be approximately 350 feet north of Riverwood Lane at the top of tho hill. I recommend that Riverwood Lane j - not be extended eastward from SW 92nd Avenue. .. , a) 0 . ...., ‘ 4. The concept• of constructing Riverwood Lane as a narrower—than—standard luu ....11 ' street was discussed, NPO #6 did not support the idea. Therefore, 1 • , recommend that Riverwood Lane in Kneeland Estates III be designed at ... -: the same width as the existing Riverwood Lane th the adjoining subdivision (approximately 34 feet). . ,... . .., , ' •-,,,,„., •* ' . ' 1 r . . . . .,,, .„,,,,„...,,-4„..., . ... .4.''' •, '''' . .. "'' '.'` , ' . 4.',1-"'.' " ". ' " ' ." 1 4 1. .- Memo to Council v. "- •- April 3, 1986 Page 2 ° 5. There was concern that adequate sight distance be provided In SW 92nd Avenue for safe traffic oprations. A traffic study was sugFlested te, - address this concern. I feel that we can achieve better results by specifying certain design criteria. Therefore, I recomme4d that Planning Commission Conditiol Mo. 12 be amended to read as foil ,s: • 12. The public improvement plans for SW 92nd Avenue shall provide a minimum stopping sight distance of 300 feet , • along SW 92nd Avenue and a minimum intersection sight • distance of 350 feet for vehicles entering from Riverwood Lane. • These criteria are based on national standards developed by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHT0) , The AASHTO standards are somewhat conservative, thereby providing for the • fact that some vehicles will exceed the design speed of 85 MPH (the current speed limit). These requirements are greater than what we would usually require on a minor collector such as SW 92nd. • 411 6. There was a request for additional traffic studies to determine existing traffic volumes and traffic speeds on SW 92nd Avenue, Such studies t would be useful in addressittig existing traffic concerns on SW 92nd Avenue, but would probably hot help much in deciding how to design Kneeland Estates III. therefore, I would questions whether volume/speed studies should be a condition of subdivislIon approval. • _kit. • • '• • (RRWtbr/24360) tt ad . ; . Ed 7,* - A r• ".1• a , , t : L '' 0 0 ,g i f}�2 1 k. : '' ' ` Division of State Lands y: \, xl a , VICTOW ATWEH 1445 STATE STREET,SALEM,OREGON 97310 PHONE 373-38.05 y w OOVEi1NGii a h I . , . Ill�', OREGON STAT April 30, 1986 LAND BOARD g)11(77114 . . VICTOR AtIYEH E ar Governor s. `� .4 8ARQAFAROg .IS Lincoln Savings and Loan Co MAY ti.), 1986 Secretory of Stc Hl 10250 SW t r e e nb u r g Road i' . DI LR TeERFORD Portland OR 97223 CITY OF TI a�,Rl , Attn: Caffall PLANNING DEPT. , a Dear Mr. Caf f al l 4 • • •• ` The Division of State Lands has been informed of the ` - proposal to develop properties in your rswnership along why, - SW Riverwood Lane in Tigard, Oregon. We have been further informed by the Corps of Engineers that portions + ' property Alteration of wetlands of the are Wetlands r. by placing fill or removing more than SO cubic yards of a . material requires a permit from the Division of State Lands. I am sending copies of the Oregon Removal-Fill Law, , administrative rules and permit application forms for your information. Please feel free to call " E you have , any .,� _ « an questions concerning this matter. ' •• Sincerely, 1 +1il6ll gx° Kenneth F. Bierly r: Environmental Permits Section `' KVB tb i • Enclosure in 0813f cc Norman Harker, Alpha Engineering i. N Lyden,, . .City r. ;gard , W M . Keith L den Cxt of �. Rich Johnson, Corps of Engineers Sally Arroyo L , , .• 5 1 - '1(.0 r . . • . ,„„,",„. , , - . . ... ' . ,'.. • ."' ..1 ,i,'.1 //j,"-..4,i4i;:6'4'''A`. 0 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY. 0 �' •,Ttf' +1;�1` PORTLAND DISTRICT,CORPS'OF ENGINEERS �'( L.• -I:•i■ i y1 P.0.BOX 294b . J p,� .... ,„mkte �',,,/ PORTLAND,OREGON 97206-2946 . • °i;\i�.. `~ ,itr.r r • �" �4 R e p I y t o •t",lrtsoc Attention of r '' a April. 11, 1986 -' Operations Division (NPPOP-•'R7.1) ,• V • • .. ,. Subject: Tualatin River - Fill J i I. n. Alpha Ergie.eevi g, zttcorporated • ATTN: Norman Harker `' `0 1750 S.W. SkSkyline Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97221 :p Dear Mr. Harker: h We have reviewed your request for information regarding our .' permitting authority for your proposed housing development near the Tualatin Cover, Mile 10, in Washington County, Tigard, Oregon. The Corps of Engi.reers, under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, has the authority to issue permits for fill or dredged material placed in i.'- a " s off. the United States. The" term "water of the United States" • vaatt�r .y � n l.: , ' ��ilcludes the territorial seas and all. waters, ui to their ordinary high water mark, that are part of a surface tributary system to and including - - navigable waters of the United States. Wetlands adj cent to these waters . •:`�L- are also "waters of the United States". .a " Based on a recent in,spectiot by Corps personnel, parts of the :w proposed development site are within wetlands adjacent to the Tualatin nd River. In particular, S.W. Riverwood Lane, west of the sewer , lots 1, 2, 3, 49 5, and 18 contain wetland areas (enclosure 1). Therefore, an individual, permit must be processed prior to placing fill t > , in these areas. For activities involving fill in wetlands, a permit will be denied if there is a less environmentally damaging practicably:, ^it';ernative. . Practicable F alternatives to as develo in at other locations reducing O ' the scope of the project to minimize wetland filling, or redesigning the , . project to avoid filling wetlands, must be considered in our evaluations . !1 If no practicable , J .„. p le alter nati ,e exists and a need for the project to c . wetlands .. justified, then the * , 9. it ate for the impacts o ' +L7 .II be located in the ereasures�f;oe��i corridor is us�ipie tf the fill: :., ,.� � project should include g ` activity. Such measures could ideally include replacing in kind the tt wetland habitat to be filled With wetlands of equal value, or enhancing e the value of other nearhy wetlanda that will not be disturbed du L eey u ''''...+;:`..i« x a .+. +Y. Y. 4 a ,+ yy / • • -2- Enclosed is a permit application form (enclosure 2) for your use. .,a When we receive the completed application we can further assess your • •W .. permit needs n • • If you have any questions, please contact Richard Johnson, Chief, Permit Evaluation Section at the above address or telephone (5 03) 221-6995. • Sincerely w w`'• . Am lewgard Chief, Regulatory Branch • Enclosure • • • • 4 to ftb • • p N". • . •h F,. •. do -_--mar: _, ' - c€v€teaa1,rr�t!a:. trI _ ig�< 1i t �y :.?1111 -.• a .•4 ' -� F 15£0 OE7f£il T. . .._ . _.. 18 Sirats-F fiy 0.Rllisss - P ,' r /. Ks...� _ • l� s $' r - � `_a tom•. �ii1�IttA1 eS.nCA... . . .. .-8_lt/ti r s _ _ ' , �- . 0.8 S_`9 t>7 _ l t _ k . jrF •. a 1 / _ - > J - of ficT AREA-. - .., . . . 3_7 Ares: - - -� ! 1` :. i 1' I*4 WefR tF 1/1373 ALLk'dcn' _ 21 twits slrr r_h t1y others 3 JkC.-Cis1s°G° �"� ,3 , .\ . - _ tFSILtFD MEL OF Min . . 18rthr t --`' -_ i '. :� 2°-{3/4`-O')Crushed Rock � �, O — WE SULPPLY._. . ... .Pret ter Vater plsidct - ,S� 1 : + SE 6E;DISPOSAL.: . -. . __U.S.A..-Y -:_• - 6'-{2'-0')Crushed Rock r usAingLoe-.f.�+llrtr - eFM _ •r-.. :-� Lit; Ple sED UTILITIES SdITHla:FLAT_. . . .v.dergi�nd:Elec.Tele pMeeee I EiblS TV. M. PUTS. . -. . - P to the.t1 ref_ .- -TY STREET SECTION - r a - - - nfs - = Tom:_ -j r !' • ,`t: �3 v - /i r.6I r J . r. ;O1fifNER/Z EI/ELOFER~ - - ...r- ` �, . - '' - \` ♦ CO I - /`43/fJ,/JJ'� �, , t_uvtoi 'J f:AV1fi4�j. $1 Alal _ { - i•- - i. a �\ + r.��' ♦r.i J '1�J ♦ i,S uo210 yw 6CS>N ev26:¢v __ ��_ '!l _ - l' 1 } '_P. �, 1 % - P OJ •.. r.,tt 1 L Po271..a:a^, mlC=:eoN -z1 S- .:j�s� ' �. �. ✓'- /'r r'�I R �.J.�'�=.x l a t !:J, Tsze±.:.Y.45:-/.f:b,1. , ` -�s-r - w � � `; ��°�`., (I? 1 ii;t�J•'-9.r.,..111- r`awl ENGR/3URVEYOR/DESIOM- j% .- _ '-1 ., �,q" � `�\��_ mod!__ `/-" J i-: Ir fi sr tier. [ t - ALPHA.�rls:riJe.0 _ Y 1r r { 1� vCa,11Jt. e' � y - - mfr: -J r I !. .f 1 t z fgso *VI `,11e.YLePtE 'i, 1.vPdty� ir: .\,,, ,o ! may , ` .�` - 1. " r, .. t, ,% t i i\. f'DCTGAr4 D`, 012-=6rt•,J: 41ZZt ` 110 .'b. � -1111*, �b.�` �'`_ °-� -."..... .-7.�- _` ltd 7/ `f ro; it,1 t i\ T6ut-7-11-1.c56 _ - fr /. ,•t: - _ mss•;: tr �` .:- :°- �-r 1:- "1v'�-+_f j 1 1 N,.• L �Ae.t 1 -mss _ - - _ . _ - - ♦ _ _ _ -L � j' -1- - 1� _ , `-- r\ �'-,---:-t \ _ -^ ��`°7'..`�•►.` _ - - ` z--tl--��`."al ,..�"-arr.-..: 't'- -wrt'-'�C`" -,. -/ro-- _ a --� . .fit � __-- ---^�`,---__ .\ 1---:-L'7'-'• . �. r N. tL •`� �1' .r•r..l. ._=:_.Y'g �"'_____ _ _ :� ` r ' j -'- I. 1....01-5. �,.° r �` \ qt `,� � • R io p.'- `\ 1.t�rrl•/ ----.• 4� � -� t _ ,~ a° g) ---- •. _` \ r'/ / /ter �� -. 15i� i m1 ..- / 1 N 1_ft, -----7 /../ qt_. - f . .60 YR. rfaXg7 1 / ♦> -I I: ' i X / -\dam s ;J. ' -...� - - { i N., r,f OPEN _SKOE . 1 t: 1f t '' ;.• 1,��•�' 7' OPEN SPACE ' 1,-- ,FLOOD PLAIN IN NATURAL STATE i t �/ \ t r1 _ 1 f J 1 1 ! ►. i1 it - L b; I L�� anniiREVISION 8Y Dist-s to _i- I: . ®Al1 DEC tees, P R:OJ E CT SHEET F ALPHA ENGINEERING itt: 01141Sell CO S SC7l{L (#_100 l.7JP6: SSIf.sortsiet aavo:, -- KNEELAND ESTATES NO 3 PRELIMINARY PLAN , taloa- 1`�l V OJECq'Eye J �_ - Pmaf3A'019., oaE9ops®72211 85-1280!. - �y _ - } - a\ \ Pb i.S03:S 2 92-,9774 APPROVER -T/LL 900 2S 1 14A OF .-r _ - �,^: .� r :r.- �. .__ ['� .d'a.� .. . � :.+ S. �.� s. �',,. r,. r.. -= o " '•.`a •�, _i s'�+•�- - . - -' a -.. - ... ' . .„. . ... ' 0 e , z : .7. ... . , . .. . March 31 , 1986 . .. ., • .,..,„, .... - . . Robert Jean, hdministrator \ -; City of Tigard P. ii. Th:3 27397 .- •, ' Ti gard, Orcgon ., ,7/7223 _ . \ Dear Mr. 1 , . .. This letter is m. follow up to toady's visit to the site of the . , b proposed Kneeland development. Those present were: myself; Dana Siegfried, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; Norm Harker, Alpha ... ..... Engineering; Keith Liden, city of Tigard planner and one other . .,...„,.., „,, city representative. The objective of this field visit was to ' `. : identify what wetland issues there might be regarding future . - . development of this site. The impetus of the site visit was a letter I sent to the Tigard planning department dated March 3, - VY96. I have attached a copy of that letter for your , .! 1.. , .... information. , . ... . In that letter I painted out that lots 1 , 2, 3, 17 and 18 were .,. . , .,. .... k all "clearly within existing wetlands and should not be built on. " I assume that since I mentioned in that letter that a Section 404 permit from the Army Carps would be required they . - , were consulted in this matter by your staff. This morning three issues emerged which I would like to address: . 11. 1 . Wetland and riparian wildlife habitat regarding the iiiieeland development. 2. Wetland identification on a city-wide basis relating to your :::',.. ...: c comprehensive 3. City of Tigard parks; natural habitat vs. developed park lands, espezially as parks management relates to wetland issuet. - — Regarding the first issue: There are several points I 'd like to le ! make about the proposed development. I would appreciate it i4 1 . you would ehter these into the official record regarding thi ... develoOment since it is unlikely I will be able to attend the E ..1 April 14th hearing. 4 itm I A. A 1 pointed out in my March 3rd letterl there pre ',.. .4 wetlands involved With soffie of Ihe lots. Lots 1 , 2, 3 and lg are ,,. clearly within wetlands. Of these lot 18 also ,mppeariii to be within the 100 year floodplaina In my opinion this lot should havie no..... devt-hlopment on it. It is adjacent to a significant .. ... wev.land. What oxitts on this site is a Well-detined emergent ' ,1, , :,.■■ wetland in Eh l?. south of Jot 18 which is bordered by a scrUb-shrub Wctland consisting of woody plants such as willOW, Oregon white . • - - . - . . . . .......mnrcaraw..........■,.. -----. .. ... , 1 ,.. ... . , , . . ,:.• • •• .. . . ... s 40 0 . % ,. .-- , . ...„ .. . - —• ..., ,..,-... . --,.., ash, willow and other wetland species, This scrub-shrub wetland . • 1 also on a significant portion of lot l',8. The rest of lot 18 e.'2.....- -., C consists ef typical riparian vegetation that is found along watete-Courses such as rivers, streams, ponds and wetlands in the , Tigard area. The wetlands, appear on the draft copy of the U. S. Fish and Fish and Wildlife's National wetlands inventory (Beaverton Area) . I have enclosed a copy of that map with the , -, . . .... areas in question circled. The wetlands appear to be more . extensive on the ground than might appear on their map. L will . . - . . be sending a copy of this letter to Ben Harrison , Wetional e . Wet/ends Inventory office in Portland for their infermation. Most of their wetland mapping is done through aerial photography interpretation and, while generally excellent , cannot catch all ... 7'.e"12 of the wetlands in the metropolitan area IL is significant to note that they do show the emergent wetlands to the east of SW . - 92nd on their map. Keith Liden indicated that these may not ' . -, .,, eei ''. „ . , appear on your comprehensive plan map for wetland resources. Reference to your "Flood Plain And Wetlands" , on page 1-23 of e your plan would indicate this to be the cese. There are no .eie, -e, wetlands noted on either side of SW 92nd on this mop. I will . ..:(. .- e, discuss this further under point 2 of this letter. I have , . . d . 1 . enclosed a copy of your flood plain and wetlands map as well . , . . ...-- -. Lot 17 does appear ta be out of the floodplain and wetlande, ..',. .e although it does have an excellent stand of riparian vegetation. ,e-e! This site, assuming the slope characteristics are not limiting, i could be develop Td without significantly impacts the adjacent • .,,..... -1 ,? .. wetlands. This is not the case with lot 18 for the reasons 1 4 ,1 i - , have pointed out. . .. . .. b. Lots 1 and 2 are also within wetlands. 1 would urge your staff to take a careful look to determine whethee. they are also within the 100 year floodplain. The adjacent wetlands, ..:' .1 although significant, are not as high quality as those east of 92nd, smith of lot 10. ..P.• is my opinion that if the applicant can necure the appropriate permits, and if an acceptable , mitigation plan can be worked out with Oregon Department of Fish ., and Wildlife, these two lots could be developed. This Will 4L require adequate buffering between the proposed development and • OE the existing wetlands and should include some modifications of i,-- OD these wetlands to enhance their wildlife habitat values 11 . (plantings, increased plant diversity, digging of ponds, etc. ) . is.:1. .0 All of this, of course, should be done in concert with the parks fil department developing its own plans for the continued protection — CD . of these wetlands (discussed under point 3 of this letter) . ill ..,' ....3 c. Lot 3, seems to be intermediate between the first two , . subnunits I 've addressedm It has more diverse wet1and plant features ( more rushes9 wir,ows, etc and is much less a ,. monoculture uf reed canarYgrass ) . This lot seems even more , ,. ... .. likely to be within the 100 year floodplain. If it 15 hot, and development is alloWed, anei a 404 permit can be obtained -For limited Wetland fill , then mitigation would be in ordei-. My .„ recommendation would be that any Mitigation plan that is I . ..... . .. , A .... ,7 •,,, I 1 I . . - - developed be coordinated for lots 1 , 2, and 3 so that a biologically and hydrologically sound plan can be developed. d. It is unclear whether the Corps has jurisdiction over . the Seep (s) on the hillside which lie upslope from the proposed road. Dana Siegfried expressed doubt about their jurisdiction this morning. It is obvious from the existing vegetation that a considerable amount of water does flow down the hill toward the wetland. Therefore, there is a hydrologic connection between the two areas. Oftentimes seeps such as this do represent important wildlife habitat for such spscies as amphibians. I fz. l their value should be recognized in the development of plans for the proposed development. e. The proposed road appears to be above the wetlands, . . although the seeps support wetland species throughout the alope. The hydrology of the entire slope should be studied by the applicant to determane what impacts relating to drainage will be - : induced by placement of the road. ee • f. i am concerned about the future of the small pond adjacent to SW 92nd. It clearly has significant wildlife habitat values and should be included in the overall site design to ensure its integrity is protected. I suggested this morning that a limited amount of public access for wildlife viewing would be desirable. Sufficient planting of wildlife-attracting plants around the pond would limit the incursion of humans around the perimeter while allowing an observation site. The Motorized vehicles which presently have a major negative impact on the site need to be discouraged. . _ g. Resource agency involvement: The resource agency staff who most often work on iseues of this nature are Gene Herb and Joe Pesek, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Dianp Hwang e - and Nancy Ell .frit, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and representatives from the Regulatory Functions, Permit Section of the te S. Army Corps of Engineers ( I assume in this case that would be Dana Siegfried ) . I strongly suggested during our site • • visit that these individuals should be consulted before any mitigation plans are established since your staff does not have a • NMI background in development of such plans. Gene Herb' s office address is 801 Gales Creek Rd. , Forest Grovel Oregon 97117 Phono: • 229-5104. Joe Pesek's address is: 17330 Evelyn St. , Clackamas, 15 : Ore. 97015 Phone: 657-205B. Diana and Nancy are in the same MOM a) office at 727 NE 24th St. , Portland, 97232 Phone:231-6179. (9 UJ Point 2 Wetlands Inventory: I1ased on our field Visit and lack of indication of wetlands an either side of SW 92nd, I can only conclude that your wetland mapping/inventory is incomplete. It ill,' my opinion that there are very significant wetlands present on the Kneeland site as well as on adjacent lands. The for male" ( sign to the east of 92nd, which is place in an emergent wtland indicates that Future conflict's are in store for this property as well . l 'd like to suggest that you take another look at your wetland resources as soon as Possible. To date I have cOmpleted LL1 k. _ .. ...... . .. , .,, ` h wetland, riparian and upland habitat inventories: for; nine ,...., t . Washington County CPO's, City of Beeaveton, City of C3Aa d*ta nee :. .'' r y Linn, ce " City r f City t an d�Wand am currently we rt ng c Baal 5 update for the City of Portland. I would be happy to assist the City of Tigard in aes ,« «- ;• ` wetland/riparian wildlife habitat update that could be utilized r"• on an interim bases until your comprehensive plan is due far periodic c revi =w. „, . , -, Point : : Parks and wetlands: I am extremely concerned ovate the :: ,i -c tur e of the emergent and scrub-shrub wetland* bstwasn the `, .: .. Kneeland property and existing parkland* at Cook Peek. Will theSe . maintained in natural s h city perks department? I have sp ent ag r7atdeal if tiee di ain g «au ch : _ issues with Tualatin Hills Park and necreet i oa District tOi"um! • . Muller , their grounds management director) about this topic. I feel they have approached a nice balance between en► acti vt and '.: 'passive ' parks management objectives and Osuld Naps Tigard p4rkes ., department would take a similar approach. The existing natural y : wetlands on and adjacent to the b<neel axtind of to offer a xCel l ent • ,i . opportunity to provide a natural ”"buf4er1lo" between then residential `' a r .sa and Cook 'Park 's active recreational sr(,asb Thin also provides for the maintenance of significant wildlife habitat. E'∎ I hope these comments have been of some a ssiatAnte in addre :sing d, y the concerns 1 ra ��a g n my earlier letter and to y " staff '.tl , ''. during_) our site vi ..lit. If I can be o• any additional help please feel free to contact me at Audubon ny 292 -6 or hose 224-1004. ,. i Pena c • .• i,.••.°: Si ncersl Itn.,,, I / '�47 ..a F . : Michaeal'rl C. Houck, Urban MaratearalI iiit - ,. cr- Jov Peso k, tJDF I Getie Herb, O1IFIA Drgna Siegfried,fried, Army Corps • n'i.ana Hwang, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Norm Harker ,. Alpha Engineering Sal 1 y All ' , neic hbbrhbod assoication Jilt Broome, The Wetlands Conservancy Rk ph Rogers, W S. EPA Wetlands Program, to Seattle, Wa. ' a „ .. „'... .......... r,w....... ,. '. W .,.c......•• r ... ,.. fie+..+Mh•.n.. N h 1 r Jr. lu. A , 7 , . . . , .. , 0 40 , . . _ . -. -: We the residents of Kneel&:nd Estates 11 are concerned , , ,-- po-- about maintaining a continuous frontage appearance along 93rd. t ' Ag2 "`r :. This we would like accomplished by dedication of 22 ft. of ;: any rear lot which will be adjacent to 93rd cul-de-see We 0N17.- Iv ,,- ,, _ . . request access from the 93rd cul-de-sac down to Riverwood 12g91q , pivia an attractive greenba�i"t' and at least a fo cpath. ' , , �° Out other concern is abidement by any developer or individual builder to covenants which govern either Kneeland Estates or " Copper Creek. 1:4, Finally we would request properties to have direct frontage .'_... to either Riverwood or 93rd cul-de-sacs name address 1c,..,-;,D A ‘,., ' / .tl' e rte►'-- '�u''�',W^�, ,�"/1, � �,•� ,,,.....r, 2 '�. .G► 4. -41;4.1,4d4,1 ....) „ - -- 3. -17 01-1r A'�(vD .5� X1.3 , ` 4 d�j 4) a vIad.L 16 '/ ?O S w, CIA k4 r )6 47:41 /L 9f sr 4.-5 Lei 9 3rd & • --- �� A ',1;74,,k- :.. 9. A 4" - 1 0.D4'--e",.. e.,..).),, (____.,. w,„: i 6 II, e-5--,...S- ).-e) 7‘..1 °'-'"‹. , 12. eeAA_ )/- ----- Z ct-pa0 5, c..). F. r 13 t AA 14. e/A-ZIK y ' t 1 4 9.2 z --/-,-e -u 'r /G� ,5 f c �`3/i.�l u?---e�.- • 1f. ., -r 9.2 ,5�'' 5 ca, ', £?i ›.. ' 17„ /1204.u.), -, t-ea,f-r,‘ ("2-6 o L.,5•cio ,f)?.?_:e_eia., Ak47_, . i ors ; . s n 0 , 19 !,,e. e'0 64/sc S c -3it� 4c -I 20. l / if it In", i'''''.' ' t ti)ti go (A.) 13fj 4,11_,_ 2-f ' ` • /1____ ,14 4'�6-0 Si..) . . • `•ice 1Q{s�y; ,�...� _ °^-- ----.. id • a ,.. )\ We the residents of Kneeland Estates II will' see t©orb , F the clean-ups development, and maintenance of a dedicated greenway and/or footpath. 2. ' l'_Y -- 1. , � M w 1 5. 4#5.4.e e:,,,dit....AtAe...01..... ,000,,,...402.9e,/,‘„e„.60,.. . :;,.....1', 3. ilit-i 'e:A*A''-'''--.*---' .„' 4. 'id 4- . 6/L,A.,... f d. 4j 6. L ` 7. fet.,/td--(-.1t/t .ij'A—e..4.. "6e,st-e-," - a . . 9. '.7-;/aA/1,1 10*Wet'', C ‘''. 11.. E ::: R 12. k a `' 13. ef'tef.r-.,,, � , 14. r, 16. 17.e s 10 6 . o s .'y d • u r• • N it (Urr' . . . : IF a a l . r ' • _. . w . :C.:: • • rya a , 6,' 7y(;t3... e..„,e,:"K__) 4)-76-42 6. .... .-. ..-...., a... it•-1,7 , . ---6,-TA----- 3 it.,_,),(1)--- .,...., 3 .• .... ,, --,)„.7,iej A (2 .w c •7/--//t , I��% /1/C /y / L • 9. .,. '';,i• ..i',,,g M,0-'74-t; r),(....-) • • 1!1 till • r • .n .u• . Lam". ' h t yW, � .' ' ''.. . Alibil4Prr. —'' . •-'...1,1 , . - . , .• . ., •. . . . . • , .. ... • . . -....,. ..-. ‘. . ...sr " ,, , 11•- ... •- . - •- 40 '..'.:. :. %, ... ,Ii. . C. Mayor Cook read proclamat* n declaring May 12 through 17 as .e.e . "Tigard "- 25 Years And Building" for the Civic Center dedication e week, ee• - ..e .,, -• ---. ., , - 8. TIGARD PROMOTIONS, INC. (TPI) PRELIMINARY REPORT ,:r7.. , '1 .: , a. Chuck Martin, TI President, highlighted th planning bing - ... ...4,-;.',...... accomplished for the annual Crusin' Tigard '86 celebration *2 . . .• •... I. CO • scheduled for the last Saturday In july, He stated TPI wishes to • . ,. tie into the "25 Yeare and Building" theme of the City this year , , • .. ç \\. • and is working around a 1961 theme for the celebration with a eee'ee: focus on family participation. .. ''.• • . ,., .. ., ''' b. Councilor Brian congratulated TPI for their dedication and hours e ... . of work. , I '''.:-. 'e •4.: . t 9. PUBLIC HEARING - STREET VACATION - 99W FRONTAGE ROAD AT PARk STREET ... - ,:.• . a. Public Hearing Opened . . - . es .........„,, ...,:li, b, Recorder synopsized the vacation request by Mercury Development - - . noting it was needed to facilitate the development of commercial . property along 99W. The Planning Commission and City Engineer •. , . - recommended approval of the request. ,. 1::: *- C. Public Testimony: . . . , -.e.'e Proponents ,.. o Paul Graham, Mercury Development, requested approval for site development needs, le -.i .• a o. Recorder recommended approval, .. • .• ... . -....-. - e.i: . e. Public Hearing Closed - f, ORDINANCE NO. 86-19 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE 99W ................ FRONTAGE ROAD IN THE VICIN1TV OF PARK STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF -1 „, ...,•. TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ORLGON, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, .." . g. Motion by Councilor Brian, eeconded by Councilor aohnson to adopt, 69 Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 10, APPEAL PUBLIC HEARING - SUBDIVItION - S 1-86 - LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN ...,.. „...8 00 A request by NPO #6 to review on appeal an approval by the Planning ..... . ' (9 Commission of a subdivision dividing 8.68 acres into 18 lots with a .,., .1 Lu minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet, This will be an "argument-type" ...1 hearing only, The Council will coneider only the record before the Planning Commiseion, which is on file at City Hall, The Council shall ' ° not consider any new testimony or evidence which is not in the record in , ...,, accordance with Section 18,32,320 of the Tigard Municipal Code. a, Public Hearing Continued - From March 24, 1986 . , b. Declarations Or Challenges: Councilor adon and Sohnson stated , they would not pat-ticibato in thls decision at they were no • present for prior hearings and did not review the full r'ecerd, Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUIES - APRIL 14, 1986 r. .. --• ''-- , 44 ' ea . - . . . . , -% .. .... , . 0 . . . C. Senior Planner Liden highlighted the efforts by staff, developer, '.. and citizens during the last two weeks to resolve some of the ', . . . • , . issue . Except for lot 18, the Audubon Society and Corps of • . ee .v, .... ee Engineers had indicated approval with some modifications. Corps -, of Engineers will require a 404 permit be filed prior to work in . . 44r the floodways. City Engineer, Randy Wooley submit:ted a copy of •- . „ ...- . his memo dated 4/3/86 which outlined comments and concerns r , - . . regarding the proposed development. CLty Engineer s -. - -.74 recommendation was to not extend Riverwood Lane across 92nd Avenue e--.. -e... with only a driveway to service lot 17 from 92nd Aueeee, He -- further noted that with Riverwood Lane going through to 92nd more , • -- ingress/egress for the neighborhood would tle allowed and said *, ' - -- design was in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Traffic ,e Element. He recommended Riverwoed Lane be constructed to a 34' wide right-of-way. . . - . P . . . ,. .'' d. Argument: .: • .., . . - '-- .:1.:j.i, -, . . . :4, --) le David Homer, 16520 SW 93rd, expressed concern for wetlands - . .. • and slope and suggested a path be placed from Kneeland t[I e. -... ..*:, :".1'.' Subdivision (or a 93n1 Avenue) down to Cook Park to help • . e . ease traffic problems, . , ., . . .. , e , . .. .. . , 0 Sally LeRoy, 9505 SW Riverwood Lane, suggested that to be . . ........ . • e ,e.. .e. e consistent with policy 3,4.1, the wetlands could not be ". encroached upon and noted Cook Park and the surrounding L.,•-•,-.. .., wetlands had educational/research value. : * ^7 );):'' :'' ti o Don Mangelli, 16415 SW 93rd Avenue, was concerned about the . streets/traffic and wetlands, but noted he was not against further development in the area. • . . , ie,„ -....• . .....-. . o Phil Pasteris, NPO #6 Chairman, eoted history of request • and the NPO's involvement to date, NPO # and the citizens -" . .: . .. present at the last meeting voted to not have Riverwood 7.e .. 4.., ,. extended to 92nd Avenue. He suggested the developer's new . .. proposal of a subdivision design had potential but ' . . requested additional time to review with citizens, staff, - . . and the developer. o Councilor Brian noted hundreds of hours of eitizens hearings had gone into the development of the Comprehensive Plan and that document required Riverwood Lane connect at 02nd Avenue. ; )- I-- ..... -.I 0 Councilor Edwards questioned whether it had been determined . ain that lot 18 did encroach in the 100 year floodplain. City — 0 Engineer stated this would heed to be surveyed to know what LILI .J . amount of encroaP.hment would occur. . . , - o Dan Leslie, 9540 SW kiverwood Lane, was concerned with an A,' 4 ,4 increase of Park traffic coming onto Riverwood Lane shoUld it be connected to 92hd AVehUe. . . . . , , ,• . .. .- ..... . ,. . ,. page 2 _ couNc/L mINUT5,S - APRIL 14. 1006 , ki .! ' I Y 4. . . '..i',, ''' 011 411 . ., .4. . ' . .., .7,3 ''• . 0 Norman Harker, Alpha Engineering, 1750 SW Skyline Blvd. , represented the deeeloper - Linooln Savings, He noted they •. . . -• were aware at' the need for a 404 permit with the Carpi, of e-....-, ,, • Engineers. He further reported on the NPO #6 meeting with ---- ,- the citizens and suggested a condition be placed on the „ . development to survey and retelete anything which would fall .. within the 100 year floodplain, - . -.0 o City Administrator suggestA Council could approve the • , request subject to an alignment angle of Riverwood Lane at . 7 . • : --,, 92nd Avenue being approved by the City Engineer. He „.....,, . -; •,...:;. encouraged Council to ftet the parameters of approval no ,- ., • o Community Development Director cautioned CGuncil that the . transportation plan was in place prior to any density planning occuring in the Comp Plan process. H was . .. concerne.d how conditions placed on this development would e impact both the plan and density. , 9, Public Hearing Closed .1.- .' f. City Administrator stated the 120-day time lihe requirement by • _ LCDC was running out and tiat Council would have to adopt a final . c-der in this matter by May 5th. • . - . ..., g. Councilor Edwards stated this was a difficult decision but based e '. -- ... ..., .• -: upon the Comp Plan, testimony before the Planning Commis6ion, the .. . .I testimony received by Council, and the 4/3/86 memo from the City . Engineer, he recommended upholding the Planning Commission 1., . . - decision to approve with modifications.. . . • '.. - ... .1 Lots 17 & 10 reviewed and concerns addressed -. - ,i.... .,, .2 Width of Riverwood Lane addressed, . - - .3 Modify Planning Commission approval based on the 4/8/86 : . .• ,,, ..'. Citj Ehgineer's memo. ,.e. He suggested the Council could then proceed with adoption . of ' ee . .. findings and approval of the subdivision request. He noted , • concern about the continued occurance of citizens presenting problems to Council at tine 11th hour. ie. ., h. Councilor Brian stated he concurred with Councilor Edwards and , CL CC would uphold the Planning COMMiS;AOh approval with the following modifications'. e. 0 • .1 Lots 17 & 18 be deleted with no half street 4.mprovements >,.. i:- 11... being required to 92nd Avenue on that side, . Riverwood Lane be extended to 92nd Avenw,? with design criterion noted in item #5 of the 4/3/86 City ngineer's . .. , CD memo be addressed and subject to final approval of Steeet ... 11 and parking design by City Engineer, Special parking bays, . and widths at intersection with 92nd should be investigated with NPO review prior b..; 1;he 5/5/86 Council meeting, ■ All property sho.eld be surveyed and that within the 100 year floodplain should be dedicated to the City for greenway purposos. ez, - -.,, .4 IneorPeration of a footpath, if possble, to assist with ,., • traffic to and from the park. , Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1986 . • . .. ,. .. ” . • 410 410 i. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to uphold the Planning Commission decision to approve with modifications as discussed by Council and direct staff to prepare a final order for 4. •." • • 5/adoption on 5/86 subject to City Engineer's final approval. of - Riverwood Lane „design and the addition of a 4L4 permit requirement. . : • . Approved by a 3-0-2 majority vote of Council present, Councilors - 1adon and Johnson abstaining due to not being familiar with former . record. • j . Developer, Rick Caffeli of Lincoln Savings and Loan, notod for the . record that adoption of the final order on May 5, 1986 would be • ,•. • .permissable whether it fell within the 120 day requirement ..-....," not, 114 PUBLIC HEARING - FIRST INTERSTATE TRUST - WOR 6-86 & V 5-05 '- NPO #2 A request by the City of Tigard City Council to review the Community ••• Development Director's approval with conditions to develop a 6800 sq. • .,. • ft. retail/auto service building and an automatic car wash and a " variance for deletion of a portion of public sidewalk along Center Street and to allow a landscaped are of 13,5% where 15% is required. - The property is zoned C-G and is located at the northwest corner of-.- Pacific Highway and Greenburg Road (WCI"M 281 2AA, Lots 1000, 1001., and . - . 1100) , • • - a, Community Development Director stated the applicant wished to present information to the City Council along udth a request for Council to reverse their decision to review this application. He 4;4% •. also noted for the record that the newspaper 'notice had appeared for this hearing but notices were not mailed to surrounding property owners. He suggested that Council continue to the public hearing to 4/20/06 to allow notices to be mailed unless Council . decided to not review the decision. • b. Legal Counsel stated his firm has reprennted Gramore, the applicant, in another City, but that business would have no impact O•'•:4••• n this issue. c. Tom Barghausen, 665 S. 190th Street, Kent Washington 90132, statild he was a registered engineer in the state of Oregon. He • noted the public did not appeal the irector's decision of approval, 0001" had given permission for development and curb cuts in this area and noted that there would be a hardship on the Ot applicant to delay to 4/28/85 for a hearing due to purchase „ options n the land it question. He requested Council make a .4 OD motion to reverse their decision to review, - h d. Mr. Barry Cain, Gramore repesentative, 10300 SW Greenburg Road, stai:ed they had satisfied the City of Tigard and 000T with no Apr% local opposition for the development. He requested Council trUst the staff's study and terminate review of the decision. e. Public Hearing Opened " - Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APR'tL 14, 1986 A. FIWINMI1411"411111Wil ° i 4" p (10 0 • `f . ! CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON -' ! I ENGINEERING SERVICES REVIEW CHECKLIST REVIEW OF O"-cCra SUBMITTAL CHECK �' (IF ITEM WAS y, Q t DATE: -S=v0\ Z V`'3, e CONS I DERI[H` • • " . I) AGENCY COORDINATION (OR) PERMIT CONSIDERATIONS;, A) Fedr�ral zi r : C•O.E. , E.Q. , F.E.M.A: , U.S.P.S• • B) State , .. • T L•C.D.C., State Lands, Commerce Dept. , Board of Health, h O.D.O.T. , B.R.C• , P.U.C. , Water Resource, Wildlife, D.E.Q. , Parks & Recreation.• C) Regional • Metro, Tri-Met ' D) County ,,, U.S.A. , Public Works, Health Dept. , Land Use & Transportation • E) Local 1) City of Tigard: . ' Development Services, Operations, Building, Engineering, • - Engineer, Finance, Administration, Council, Planning • . Commission, Park Board, N.P.O. .• (NOTE: Pg. 42 for details hereinregard) 2) Other: a Fire District, P.G.E. , N.W. Natural. Gas, Water District, ` Telco, Storer Cable, Solid Waste, PriVate Ownership, School District ,' % II) GENERAL CONFORMANCE CONSIDL,CATIONS: • •. A) Transportation System 0, 4 0. 1) City of Tigard: a) Comprehensive Plan a y "~ b) Street Classification(s) ® c) Bike/Pedestrian Path Plan 4.. d) Traffic Studies (CH .M Hill & S'C'RAM) i e) Existing, Pending, nder Construction • d • ,.; an . , :� .y B) 5eweragenSystemnsportation Pl . . . , . . . . . . : . : . ',.2( 4 , 1) City of Tig ard: J -- g a) Master Eewarage Plan b) Existing, Pending, Under Construction 2) Unified Sewerage Agency Regional Plan b, C) S€o 'mwater Runoff System • . . . . : . . . . . . . . . • . . 1) City of Tigard: tl ,.. ...z b) M. e ,Drainage Plan (CH2M Hill) . •W , a) Master i . --.. n Maps (Floodplain & Sensititie Lands) '. 2) Regional Sttormwlter Management Plan D) Park & GreehWay Development Plan . . . . . . . . . . , . . , : : . . . . . . . . . E) Capitol Improvement Program . . . . . .. . . , ,, : . : . .. . . . • . : . . : .�..,jj f. : 1) City of Tigard • . r. 2) Washington County ., 3) 0.0.0,T, • 2 • i ;;,/.),0 / // r a ... QUESTS FOR COMMENTS .... T ) DATE: Januar l 19I9 • v ROM: Tigard •tannins Department .. ,1 ...I - .,. r:• RE: S 1-�� A request bar t]CNC(�LN SA'U1'NGS AND LI�AN fog- a Subdivis�.on on property i:. • • > zoned R-4.5 for the propose of dividing an 8.68 acre parcel into 18 lots , . x ` ;' , '* with minimum 7500 sq., ft. in size. Located: Between Kneeland Estates �•' ' and Cook Park, west of Tigard High School (WCT4 2S1 14A lot 9f.',0).,.. . %, k- ..r.: Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review• From , information supplied by various de B rtment� and agencies and from other e. information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be ,, v, prepared and a dec pion will be rendered oQ, the proposal in the near future. -. t of you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by .ley may p provided below or attach a • .. ,• 19 86 You m�► use rchs�� s .,� •. . 22nd . separate left-err to return your Comments, UjAre u iL1e •La res,�aor�d hey, the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and • confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any 1 ` questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. gi a.' Sox 23397, 0uro aam and Ash Ave., llgarti, OR 97225. Phone.. 639-4171, Keith Liden or Deborah Stuart A +^_• PLeASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING !VITAS THAT APPLY: , We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. . c Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments • 14;;°70r -. ,.: • e' t ., , y ..... "-... -. �.,.., , ,/ \ ki..1,____ A A....u8,1 r ^ `' cam'` -9 • , = A lire ♦p ,�sri :- 6//`I 4.1 e-azoll 14,1/QI ,.... Syr ,e2 r \ ),.. , /1" ?4',t0,4—, • ..a rann eiRe (9 1 ,y r 3�7.:rir•m.�rwwmwoi�.ra+rewi..i.s�r;.a�a.mw '�♦. -.-, .- ....,- .'. '._.. .p, '.. t M 7. .718•1rtarftinlearpied11.2110•441,Lams mama rmar.015.7 i of Porson C nt i �g: ;''-' Phone No. ab y+. s ,.: ie: (KBL:p 03 ; !` _ .. ,+a 4 t,... . '+ , 1.4tL .Y•;k. c a yY a 8 • 0 ..• • - .., .'• . ',,.: . KNEELAND ESTATES III APPLICANT STATEWENT .... ,- Kneeland Estates III was given preliminary approval or a subdivision in 1981. The approval was for a eombination of 22 Attached and 5 , .. .,.- . . detached single family lots. A final plat and construction plan were . . - .,.. . completed but the project was not completed because of the change in . , . . economy. The present proposal is to subdivide the property into 18 single family lots. The present zoning is R 4-5. The proposed project will comply with the requirements for this zone. The minimum lot size is - . 71,500 square feet. . , . , . ee The proposed subdivision abuts Kneeland Estate. No. 2 to the north. This project will complete the cul-de-sac on SW 93rd Avenue. Copper Creek Stage 3 subdivision lies to the west of this property. The e . , . . . roadway construetion will complete Riverwood Lane out to S.W. 92nd Avenues thus mproving the traffic circulation for the area. . .-...°'. ., . . , - . The property slopes from north to south, Slopes up to 3O exist in .. D.. , ..... ' the the northern portion of the site. ThA, southern one half ef the u e property is within the 100 year flood plan and is proposed to be left 717 Y in its natura2 state. LU. ....., Water is aVailable in SW 92nd Avenue and SW Riverwood Lane., BanitarY sewer is available fram a line running south through the proj ,ct from Kneeland Estates 20 Storm drainage mill include collecting drainage 1 I M1tb `a Y i PP' ,!7 41. .. • from the north/ as well as the site. The storm drainage will be carried to the rv,tura1 drai nE1 e 9 way running through the site. t• • Il1 smo am q • • • y'a • ♦ 2 • r. 4'v t • H ♦ , , ry q-w ,t Y, .ky a •' .. p .. , , • .. ••, • . ' . .,.• . . a 0 I I. . ,. . . - . . STANDARD CONDITIONS, ee )4, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR P3 ISSUANCiee-e—tr'e ''- OF BUILDING PERMITS. eeee• ce .S..1 4401.V 4.t., ,......./. t 40,1A\ ,. „ .,. ., ,' :...'... ei Standard half-street improvements including,e- sidewalks, curbs, ___ ".. __ . . , treetlights, driveway aprons, storm drairlag4 and utilities (delete S. 11, • inapplicable items) sivAll be installed aloril the Stc,se). 47-)7.„'ID ANOQCAAAA.0.- . • . ,.. ' w' .' . --1. '"..' front,ege, , Said improvements along Feeee,..eeeee, , „ ...._ s ha I I _ be bui I to ... ....... , ...................... standards and conform to the alignment' of r ,. existing ..ael+a-eerete improvements..and—for4- * ..,,,,.„„?...,„,\.\,,,.., •:AA,,,, ,,.. .___„., ,, . - • , „.. ; Lo,„.A. A e..Qe.\os ,e,,k.1 , -•. • - •. 4 Standard half-street improvements including silewalks, curbs, e . . . streetlights, driVeway aprons, storm drainage and utilities (delete ' . .„ inapplicable items) shall be installed along the -e,. .... . - — . . . frontage, Said improvements along shall be built to ,....._............................._ standards and conform to the alignment of .- . . existing adjacent improvements and (or) ....e. e ; k , •. . ,... t... .......„.,, S,■ e... 1-eicet^de V,,*\47444 '4t *Scit ri '41 1. ,ft ''',., Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improVement cons ruc i p ans ......— . , . and one (I) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a , Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for , .. . approval, ....----ree........4.._ • 'A 0< .__ Sanitarsew plan-profile details y ' er pi shall be provided as part of the "--- " ' public improvement plans, X, Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans. The Section will require posting of a 100 % Performance Bond, .. '.. the payment of a permit fee and a sigh installation/streetlight fee, e Also, the execution of a : , ! . .- : 4 - - ' , ' :,• construction . .. . , . compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the ) . issuance of approved public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED , • ., , HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES1 ---------, ] 4., BONDING AND AGREEMENTS, . „• 1 e', A one (1' ) foot reserve strip granted to the "City of Tigard" shall i ..t. be provided at the terminus of *811)01 4.- N.4, ee.., Addition-1 right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the 16,U6, : k , _ c)Z, .''... i-NNemk,,ke.., frontage to increase the right-of-- AY -.., to 2'21 ___feet from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be tigd, „t,o,,,, tihe existi.ngright-of-way centecline as -, - . . established by UL.):2.4'.V k c ZflS86„VSN' t h ..r The n dedication docueelnt sha I be on city forms and approved by the Engineering Sect;on, DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSCO ee:.. . , ? ..,• . , . - • t ...1. ": *,,,- - •,•• v . . 44,-.:- ,• ' ' ''.1 . .' ''*7 ' '''' ' ' , 4. ... t.' ,.. S 0 .,• .. . ___ _ Additional right of, way hall be dedicated to th,, Public along the ,.. L. frontag f? to increose the right-of-way - ____..................__....................a ..,.. . .w, ..4....o,.................. '''' to foot from centerline, The description for said . , , dedication shall be tied to the existing right-of -way centerline as established by . The dedication document shall be on City form% and approved by the . -r , . ... Engineering Sectio n, DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTROC:TIONS ARE ENCLOSED. ....- . ...4..-r - ; - Joint us' and maintenance agreements shall be executed and recordeo ?.., _____ on City standard forms for all common driveways, Said agreements . shall be referenced on and become part at all applicble parcel . .. , .-....!. 1. ° Deeds . Said agreement shall be approved by the Engineerilg Section. JOINT USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FORMS ARE ENCLOSED, - )4. Street Centerline Monumentation ,,-- ; .... / 1, In accordance with ORS 92,060 subsection (2), the centerlines of all street and roadway right-of-wii,ys shall be monumented before . - .. the City shall accept a street improqement, 2. All centerline monuments shall be placed in a monument box . conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument boxes shall be set at design finish grade of said street or roadway, : - ,..... 3, The following centerline monuments shall be set: . . , a. All centerline-centerline intersections, Intersections . ; , ... created with "collector" or other existing streets, shall be set when the centerline alignment of said "collector" or ,. . - other street has been established by or fur the City; , . .. ;.. , b. Center of all cul-de-sac:*; %. •' . ' co4 Curve points, Point of intersection (P.I.) when their position falls inside the limits of the pavement otherwise / "...' beginning and ending point S (B.C, and E,C, ), d. All sanitary and storm locations shall be placed in posf,tions that do not interfere with centerline monumentation, CO .' - .'" .:, \‘‘Till\ "balAs of bearings" for the Plat or Survey shall , • ) v . P.' ' bkre\...:__ , which is a part of the Tigard Field , e Nehtork, \ (9 /.7., ,, '; . .,, After revicw and approval by the Planning Director and Public Works IiiLl Director, the Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington County, (RSCbs/0727P) 4' • ''' ''''': •, . , I .'..''''4'i• 1.■::, ', %,, ■ • t. ' . ' 't. % ;47 . ' ' ": .: ,h,. .„, ' t •, ,, I ., . t. ,. ,,,, , , . .A „ . .v., . ,-,. • A 4 ? 0 : .4 .. . . A 7.,... ENGINEERING SERVICE(J REVIEW CHECKLIST (Cant'd) -.,,.... F) L.T.D. Development & Non-Remonstrance Status xi ..-. ..,-. . . - '....' . .• .. , . ITEM #I(E) DEAILS ..7: --lb : . . . .-.. .',.".. Sensitive La3ds . . .4.:T%M.■.\;, .;?--9-IN. . ..g Comp. Plan Ame.Ament. . , 0 it.0.041,44. 4. . Floodplain. . .1%./..VIr. . 0.V.L :I-Pe:et' N. Zone Change. . . . . . . — . . _ . . . . _ . . . n flAqe. .... Major/Minor Partition Li Conditional Use. . . . . . 0 . .'.' .... _,..„,„ Planned Development 0 Temporary Use 0 . . ‘ Annexation. . „ . . . . . . . . — . . . . . . . . . .0 Variance . , . 0 .. , .•; &aiding Permit. „ .g-g-91,k-tvi.VC-A. . .* Nonconforming Use. . . „ . . . . . . . . . . , . 0 . .. . . -., Sewer Connection Permit gg'Rkk'4NfrAO Accessory Structure. — . . . . . . . . . . , 0 ..- , . Sign Permit , .0 Tree Removal Pe rmi t c. .;:C?\!).'.Y'.4-5-ce4. , . .r.. Fill Permit Al\,■.?.,", e- '6-9,:1/4,,V4:c.AN' .0. Blasting Permit . . . . , 0 ., Street Opening Permit El Special Assessment. .,=. . . — . — — e, _ 0 ...:., t ,,- ,.., Compliance Agreement.\?a,P4y4tV.:S....A Business Tax :.....„,(- . . Detailed P 1 a n..7‘i`..\?.-:0,PN1. Of4,Nfr,,,,,4 . , Fees 3, .4 Dedicat ion . 1 - c Joint Use Agreeinent „ . . .0 , J I'. ( oasement S;"0\i=1 t'\-c-r----e--$--1Y`'.' °I f ,a . . . . . .t.. .....,ir ...I, . . i • , • Maintenance Agreement. .. . . . . . „ c. . . .0 ., . i 1 .. System Development Charges Ote-vrk V,.--..-9‘\C--r%,'`ce-P\:, • *, .-! . .di. .. ,..,, . .., 1 :.'d".''' .,'.. . 11 Extra Capacity Streets. , . . . . . . .0 Recteation Facilities 0 storm flrainage Improvement. . . . ,0 Sanitaty Sewer Surcharge 0 0 4 4 I ; s ' :",''. • ,..,.•., ; III) SPECIAL CONCERNS: A) That this information (form) be touted to t-oe City Engineer fat review and comment — . , Ye . -sg . . No t „ e. . 13) ,..- s. 1/4. i_ ,,,‘, 4,., `b\4g- \ ';'. ce- wz. c tc-1Ae Nvsce-4-- ec,..irooLA... oc i ..:., .J. ... -,, .1 • .. 417.>, efr \r-)..k.‘,/,■0C-Zq I- 0 V1/4.-kir-tA'e'' • tA-A c-\A , iC00.. (=2.14--ct 4.(,,■,c +A. c 6. 4,A...krirz.\ . . ri \a.i.,le, ePC --\\A,44-4b eZ\I*4.e.-lis, 1/4600- -a da'k.aks,04.A.„z..\ ceowtim,e,o,,.i14-1,4) A - ,,,. .. . . k It. ) ,e L ,,,, \ r--.., t t ,,) t2,,, k 1 k 2„-Asc50.. c.:\ kr b o.+-Ai-a..*--)■ m 0,...,16.: \tjkAA „c1,,o,assi .%k 4. • ,-..'.. /.."':....,-..4 'avAt.t,s,NA.c..AA.,„ ..:. a ( : .'• ''' (49kk) k) • Page 2 • •' ' — • - ' 'v:::,' ,'.. ,' 1.* ".•"'-4"z. - 'I". •: ., .1.4," . !...'1%, ' "..,, ',,i ,,.''''' ,:Y 4,,.., . .. I. " 1 `• 1 „ •I v," c-,,,,c.e k Lyr. LA.A\o ' \\•-, 0)4•.e-4,-4,-,--3\4--e ! �' wlr v+w ^ d.c . "� .?,, 1 k c, .vs. ‘be- An.e. ' rr s e.c. w-b'. i., , „,,••, e-Q \-"-'�.`�' e.0 e.'\ e W� \a e..i e'�,%. \a v1 c �' . . • 1 h .... M08w..alli/i .. „,Tf x ; . ) J, ,. 14 cl Ltfrvt,,, r\r) ...... ' .- .'. `~-c"wlk-14-0\k o - tA-..,12-t44 e-ti- Irtel.-1.4.e>1413A- "\:Lv--04.A0A,1/4\- !Tv,w,et...!,,ki,4 A:: , ,,,,,, ,,. ,, , i- , . s I x ,., 0 LO'c' 1 A t 6 c;-cw .�," ' . .„ . ,... c: ,VV\ 2- As.' -' '-be_. Me 0 , °.s• L,0' P°' .r 4 h 11 1 ;' • t t %.../i12. k`"L e.• 'i ' 4w s�,1ti•� b W1 1 2 c,G.4-0` ' '.',, . LtOks t` b !r■ 4 e. e.. e:4A. .\-L.a,,: "C \ L +. •;1 b „, 'fI '^+r A.a. hI rV+• O 4/ 9V4""sA • Mk .. - C) ArL e... '''..t4. 0 S)e... KC, e Vte.c....k ell. c1.0\A‘C.e.A1-1A, '=kr elt iv "= r.e.- :. s {��,r9 0 A. 4,..w �t,i, A b' kkv*,, t.044".1.1 O\ 1 n ,, n ;.11- 1 I . A' * . ,. ra., kL v. k \,- ,i .,-,I.A.‘f-, e-, k\- %44 vy\Q\ kA,vs.,,, e..-4-- , too, ktli‘t \\A`'*,.. °Z. , 1•f" : 4 u , t �•, b \ ., may»:,�, • �, "Y' � v-2,,,. �a �:. ��'+.-� e,,.�� '.,d"�:. ��' !'a C�Rte. r L k441z 44" �*��-' M •t � �Y�w. 1�aRp�:_.-k yl�i"t L��.•^ �� . �Y�yr��kW'i k k�k!_�"�'Y"sI"G�1. S 1 if y Sc" Eq y �y " "` t��W'K.ie�'��✓1P''Miw T�"'Pf" \\,tt.,�w:. �P"`L �a.,. �7 V'1/44r..=, 14,64„„‘A,S.,,V, t.A..i t-Sc 0,liat' ‘.-`\1,..41/4,-to.t...4 tts\i.)k 1\.....47 44-\7- 1,e-, . , ,e 4' .dam 1 M� 1M"1» `,,;,' l S 4!hfw,!�'j' '1 \wro.,"'M.�� 4'M`Id. n/. NM `.'-4/M, W W' . l\rj'' .�J A�,� Okt)L.T. i t a 4 �to e..v e. ��vv�.�:.�.""c' c...=.0., i, !��I y 4 w ,t l �y u9� ,may " q �w, I\ v`^.? Y�k0-- 1r (LcA" \-1 r • r h■µ ,c. 'Z...*,/tt.i,' el) I"j604,k,e.0 M.2,06\,/ 0 r Mclo„ino,,,, ,.0.,rt,ttii t„,earw,,‘;4\4 cle \Z■.•,,,e...t.,.4..,doe, \,,,--a,..04....4, V-41-00.44„„ 1,,,,, n . 0 n' �y hi+"G J p i{�Y. t' Ny am�« wN� iNN� �1 � �^ � W/yW��}�, R N VW g 1� �$•.'.,,V It FI, + ' •�r y o S . ` t,l,rS,, Mph a y %..., .:- � -- v _. _..n•?'._ 4" r- e•..,�.'' " '' •4'.e ,e',t,.7. .: r 4, . ! �`r s b 0 s w �*, ,IP o •;, , ; ,� .:. • ._r ENGINEERING SERVICES REVIEW CHECKLIST (Cont`d) P}. • IV ) RECOMMENDATTONS " A) Apl;ty the "Standard Conditions" noted on pages t4-6 (herein) . B) `C q.,. '..= e.'Jr"�L e V,., ; z i.\c A c ' t f.Ji:) I �aNJ CAI-woo 6 L-4-4.A.e... �` Q� /y`'( 1 A }may., p A/ \�/y/�1♦ `A A e..,%.,,,,...\.y /+ • ,\,/,.... ..\, : \oe„, e o A)\ .. h Ner. VW \�cm. • 4✓`rp c.�V4 Y Y R. AF�+4j kV\A l SI-IcArs.AA'S =1st- 'o■eik,,,, `"\kik.e- St\-z...is- .=.A..s.,1 :. ..„‘,..., ,y..,,::,..,),...., , \o,..,.: . -:''‘,,...e,... S....v.. .,*/*,.e..e..y.‘vs...c). Ce..c.... .iotAA,„„, . M . .• .1 .,:yr{y�•y �� " t4 �4 't c „.•:.• n��"� y� �' �.ii r'1.a,.y'4w+7"M�.Mr9'rr ��A.��1..� a� t 4‘...4,1�.�.. may `'a� \Cle„ ‘V`4 s\15 ..� 4 w 1 ..w w {..y ''y Vt..) �l,X W , ;r . \\,„„e.,. - on.\V1,1 "rb 05; 1 1,4.)s M` 1 .#C-At,1.•4...0 c,a L V`,. 1 0S"2.A vtk k,or •, 4,0 to ., �ti.,��•'2.! r-sa�+ 't-C,3 \�e. ^. .-�r�-a�d�., \.,0k.-k, w� yz,s o�, ■ -�,. y. + , .A tit 't,1.N-•v,.i 711 t-tr. 'fie d �yl, \�.� r`e-vA.0 tJ C-43.. ■k %eel.w+►.t'.. t e...G...w- ' e t..∎.* .. fa., e_�:NT 4.A `W►.'Vs.G\1 W p e e,. " k Z,„ e.. 's`�i- t.ti ..-44 i... •' 4,i ." .. �.M., ,e.l M o ct.0.: �`t.. vie., ` 6i *5.41,c.a. ` �. - T'*+... +.r44 Mp•" •m � ,p} �vwv ce.. �� a.C�• 4,� � •. �„� , . , m . i c: ! 1 `) ` w �: 'z c".��.�S .� Ca : '*.�,; t�big►,�. '�`��.�q,�l��.. !p'�S"' te.'I,.+,.a ,r I' ~ l / d 1 "" + .,'a M (D VA Vs.X1.1[w'. e 1 e.Aiii 1 eow tre--...,4, i 4)a t i 4 V.,1/44..)e,.*4,44,..o to 1 \--'*.k.1/40.,. 0 °' /� ' ::..) IV • Mir t c ..0,.. i\s . X.:, o r. .. r- t j 1-, ; ,e,a, Avs,1,,6.,,.;;\,,,,, 4,j,,,,,,,,a, ‘Ake.t..1,.%‘,„,fie.e„z vr-cpV,ctobe..& Lo \t,i0.- V-Itear\t'",:" tAii, ‘ ‘4,, - 0,, ■mb \+44,,,. Ik1/4 43.0 -ro-AA,..e.e.,, e....v.4..e..>1.1,,Ari/4,..'10 -...a\- 46,...e. % 1 `x 'h f ''''} i..0 wIl " `.-`:.,,‘d. t.4.4... a 6,,MA.'4 re: ,,J D e,, = ' n7 rt k env ' r+ I,.1.occ, NOTE. Attach y ':, ,.4$,, ,, �;4heets if neoe'" saL y.\k.t , ' L e E a t .Lr M rw°'�•'W�.,. Page .} . . ' ' . ...ate>', -. 3 f ` if 4 \...1/4 ‘i„,\, r \-0 Ske... C.-_,%\t-4,) --t>4.4,-- CP Im'e..,tA,,, olot.aa.4a. \t:iti...,v\.0$.4.0,e,s,. .4., ,. ..: . i e..,,,,,,,\rt. ■, ■r-itc\LA.■v-e a . .-. .' .':',-' '`.'"'i k \ s . ..s., s e.ws 1 Ik'k,S1 e,_ -av- 16 4c. - 1 Nr..‘0 tp 43,,rt'0„k toS,„. 0, 00,404.-%!..0.16 eaki0 v e...,,, V-U.VS.P.%C.,4,0,..., 'dki,, """D . .i-. ::.......,,,-., , .N i 4,. :) c1}, .-1 e \1404,0 `\/,,e.. '.....8'..--.1/4 t,,,,, . ,4...04 e viA,.e.„-,,, , t 4.'2, %A. 0 ' 44 . ,,,,..------ at‘N.2„t,L4,,4...A,...v, „, itiNer-Z,A. t 0,..‘:,.. ..4...0'44N... eb 10■,.,_ V- \` VNu. %%d%.^"'V` '•till aN„, 4,,,,eSke to,\firt,c,"k„,..,„ ck Iti ek,A.,r,,,...\\$. s trle-co\tmsrie.1, o\o\r n.i,0..t 0.0%, ;1. ..,.., q •'1,{ «+1 rat n • •LB f M r}' i ...fir I,. �; M, R. '`i.,4 N, Il' Ar W stj •„'' y 3` .fr ` Qt rt +. •�...._ �. ., .�.: _. 6 _ ..&. ... 2 +, - .. a�l:9.'. �. V" 4 3, ••'._-..... i , _• 'Ki. 13 b F }t ✓. . ;!,,a 6.• [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] • BURTO M VC. „. 39414 S.E.HAWTHORNE• PORTLAND,OREGON 97214• ( O3)231.0763 = June 8, 1979 t,. . .-•....;. ,k( � Ctart�¢nt Tigard plc Works •,`.. ,.: ♦ 150 North First Avenue . Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 b N ' J RE: Surface Reconnaisanoe and Stability Report KneelandXII . Estates Subdivision Tigard :. x. Oregon, v, A Gentlemen: , NI Air. • . Transmitted herewith is a report requested by City of Tigard con - fl cerning the soil stability in the South area of the propa)sed, ee1and'I •{trn Estates Subdivision. • Visual inspection of the site indicates the area to be stable 6tnd .iuf table for house building sites 4• If Y ou have any questions, please feel free to call. , # Sincerely, I ,�! Thomas H.Burton Tho�. Dree F.F. No. 5373 mb/TBt i 7!,....P %. ' . .. ' ! ` YE j . ,'.1","ot. ....,„ . t,p 4 j;,...,:.;,,,,,,,„ r ; -;w tiM':4,,z i',.!, �:f L..,,.,-;,.tkitr F`4i� ., :,.a i'`e „ r V `,w' „,.1 E , @ Y So rt',,g, 5'� t r,?i 1 ,, }1� xX� „�� d� -'.y y�t5'�r a �v 2�`r� y,d�•e y�/ ,��iroY`� "^'+y� a�'J{,c .-1 �{'Fp,IM #��yta.J 7. - •R. w st .. 'iq Y t.:f RY J'f �Jh{ P"� �A.�t t4;�*N'M t �a�'� 5 { �V r1'e. ♦ti' W + ii*,• N,4+'i -•.i b -,,fri Y.. 4,I':”rot t +] k r4'1 f.��Q"*'t��i#,i. • r• •�« yw 7'}Y,,bn •.�a rC ,k.� ) 5•7, c,',:;,' ,ft,371x{., , I� FH• , a i'1..� ,'q ,y, h y ?',y_' �1 _ 'r' `� `",'wfC, t N ��W'''`�+ _ e.. .y ,. .. yea x il. „t s •� xt \ _ :, ..... :fi','',1,*, ' ' , ' , "' ,,. ,,: ,; - ..' ,., '.. - '.:'' ::' '.''.,- -'''j*, ;',',it1,1),'!-t,-;.P.'-,,,„..-',;';',,(.„,'' --' -, _. - - - __... .t �j1 X11., w, qI J.-'�,. !:� ��``„ R , ♦W,, u' , . :'',,i ,la • ',1t4.1...J..e.I. ..,'.......1,-..,..., '' '.'`.........4,...1,....:,144,........,., , ..,...,..1..1 ,', .4:A.:I ...,.. ........i,). .. '..''-4,-......-11•-•••,..;:;....1....'•'........'"'"••-"------"--"'""*""'I • , , *. 'Ad''' .'.' '"' " . :' ,,,,;,1.,',?,■,1'.!;.' • , ,,r ,, . '. .... 1/4 .,': Form 1 - Surface -,....e..:.nnaisance and Stab_iliSlue.s."-.nnaire 1 „4. N.)' .A,,';‘,',....-•. • • 74.1,,,-...,-;,,, .42„.0,-,:, '''Al'I41,..."' ,,..:. 114-,,,,,,..,,•,..'4,,, . . ,. , 1. Whiat im the general topogritt)hy of the. lyrojeorty?. :Attach , . •, . . topographic survey or sketch with pertineht notes, as applicable. (SEE' ATrACi-it0 is-1 4P-.1) . . • . , . .. . i 2. Are there any visible siglis of instability or other potentially v?e, . . ...y: .. • .. , , • . . adverse site features within and for a minimum distance of 100 Avit.v,, 1 feet belond the subject property boundaries? (landslides, I ., ' 04,-t 1 slumps, mud flows, creep, ravines; fills, cuts,. Seeps, nprings, , . r, . ponds, etc.) Describe and indicate 06 attached topographic .4.••- , ,. ,, 01 • , survey or sketch. (s.ezr ArrAc4-wo MA P) ,,, ...r., li . , . .(. . . , .... .. 3. Is any earthwork proposed in connection with site development? . . '.. I). .. . . '.'. , '• •..,. • 14; ' (Circle) s---'s .1) No . 1 , If yes, indicate depth and areal extent of cuts/fills; delle ,ibe . 1"..,..,. . f y , fill types. 10 FoU0,ATIoPs C077 Fit-cc kin C ; /JEC6-5YA kni)'. ON DX C7E-el-JETT Stoea. tit ro u-- vc.'007.. C."pr‹: wom z 7' 3- fir - 4. In your opinion, will the proposed eaethwork cause potential stability problems for the snbject and/or adjacent properties? -- e ...... .,,r . . . (Circle) Yes , I , . . . . •,. .., ••,„ • . . . . ■ • • If yes, express probability. (Circle) . . :., , . L 4 • ., . . .r, • „ ,.L. ,., . . , .■,...'..''.'...., :. i'..r.. , . ..: --- ------------ ..,./ , aosi . . ,. • , .,• P...,o....s..s..,...i..b....,l. e..„, .-b-... u....t—rem—ote . ...,, •,, fr., L... r , If Very Probabo or Possiblyi-eisplain. ;. ,,, . . . ..... .. . .1 ,' ' '.■ , ,14 • , , ■ ■■■I . A. . 5. In your opinion, !gii1. the' pirePO6ed deireiOPment ( trSUeture . , . • , , e''''''''a. . •, ' ., foundations, parkinq, area, streate,, eto.) create potential ,el...,.-,.•.• , . stability problems for the subiect iznatot adjacent properties? • ..:• ! pi . . , ' ...' !'-,,,.4, • 1 , , I C i r c i e) ' ..,, , . Yes ... ' 4 ,, '.•....r.'-'. , ;, , . . . r If. yes . express trlbability. (circle) ' . .-..‘;'.4 .. ..„, ,, . ,,:, , , .,,... ,,, . .,,..,::.,,,,','', ..,.. : ..' .,'•',.....„,.' . ,:,',,,,',•:, ,?-:.1:. '. ,.../.:'': .:'-:•::.'''':...' ' . ','., met: • Prciotible `- '',...,... .: r..„..,.' ..1..00sSi14,11,,,t,e I. ...,....'.',.Arr.•,.,:z,c..A.,..•'‘'..1 ...' beitible beit reMo.t^' i -‘.. 1"' i" ■ . t ' 1'•''' ,'? ' ''.'%ii,' '* . '' .• 7,, ' " ' - '''"'7" ' a• . , ..'!': ..“.,,,,..^.0.4.;k:.''J,ki140.,•7:4'itO!'1i'''1','„ - ,:,.1 ' ,... .. ,wIr Very Probable or •!..ebtliblY,-eXplain,Pr4I410WM4V,4P':',,,:.!,-'",....,. ...:, ....! 4..., .,.. .ii: . .. '.,, '. .4i,t,4, 0 '. . ''.'0','1•' '., . ., , .` '414',,I.,&,„1 ,,,,gtolk.4.,A,,c,'■,a ivi 4 %II 1 . . .' ...',.'t'. 4."", .' .• ., , ,..: ' .4 rr ,.P 4 ,'1-1,...w..1,. 1.,,0.,,',..,•.7,,..,,'„,' .. .. . _'i 1n:i1Y1'.... ,i. • 4):•,Z,,, iiittp4,114,44,,,,f'..L.,..4 t.•••,' .7. . , ,4 ,,.. , . '., ,, 4,, ,•. '..z '..1-i4: A,.sr.17 . 1 7 .-.-..hoi..' 6-. , If answer is Very Probable oi oseibye'ta,,.".. utitit 41' iona,':- ...aVor '50 - f A“ . -.4.„ ., is it your opinion,, on the basis of-iti:44 1.1teli &uatiO .i-t that 4 ! , ' t, _6...ri ,4 ino 4....,A,,,.,....0.) ,. . ,, , : . ,. . ,,,,. il,,,,r, ,i.,tt:::,JTii.i.A.„i,: :4E„ . :.:7: : adeqUate StabilitY ''hight be achievedb#1*Ii.efekkeit4ltiOg‘6f .the',. -.. 1.0 '- . development abd/or aiternative-foupdat oprAuppbtt ,earthOork . .:- -5i— ''' ''14.4414'2W.'. ' " . ."' ' •'.,;'',7Kti,,,V 1 11,4!,x,., ..to■;'11':+,,t..1. 4141'..,'Y'..4... 7'.‘ i,. I,4.„,,,,,,,,,, ,,•• , ,.',.,,•. ,,, , 1 "1,,, 34.!..."' , , ' $ ",7 ' . ; '7%,,,,,N.,II":',1%,„.,.4!..1.',.,'i• • ili,1,,,,'.,,''," _.-,,,,,k,,,',„,.,, .1,14.."..,,r f.' ' ' ' ' %.:111,,, ,P 40, . •' ''.-*•.1:''.:a.7.t,;•,1q1,,,,h,,Ner1;,,,, ..'*, ,, ' '1,'•'''''' ,,', ,.44,1,, :•,, .i " , ' • , , . ..1 7., ..!:,44.„..:',,,,'". 1.,,,,,1A ,,r;i„,., ...t.,4 a.,t,1„.r !, •,„.,,,,,.. ,, ,,,,,,z.o.i..4,,', •nnA1/', n . ' . °' ' '.1' ': a ,'„, ,a, ,,, .a„,, ''•■, ,, ,. '.'7 1, .•V'v:)'',1:,- ‘','■( ....1.-'4',‘,4;eri+:.1 4: ''. '.u.i.`r, ,.'0, ,4L,:,„; ,,.t.. - , , . •..,,. . , . (Circle) . .. ' , wed. ,' ,,,1 ... :'.'-',.':,,,,q,41,04tviVir-qf.,' . .'..,::.`;: .1,•-,,'t 'T., ', ..'' . - • ' ft:.•r ...1,V.1,, .. - 4 , .'s' .•'',,'.i.:,..0 7'•,,,,n,•7.- „.:-. •.. ..'1: , ".,• , '••,t;.,,a.',.1-,I '■••,,n. :v.'Yll,1 r"4 efttiV:h3;,}J,iSt7'4.i 4,",."Y,7 , 4,0'.. la. ..„.nt '' t,'.•,,,,.: - ,' ., • .0' At ;,.•-!„.., ,. ,'.,.•, ...:,:•::•,I.LP',..'i?.q.:).",,.l'::. , '7. 4, ,.1`''''_:-r;7 .- * ... ' 7(,':0:f.'F,S.ii : 13,!„ 0:Q1:-T{',Y-:'.4"::' :t :''!' • '':', : : . 4#e„,e° f:r..,,V,t,itik#1::,t,,,,,tiViqt., ..‘,1-,0:i.14(t..g'i,:t',.`ite)143Itt 0''-'eVlair4 ye.41.,,..:1-,?•!i=7. * SV,I• it i ....,,,,...vi.?: ,ti.i...11.0....of,IN:.. :.;',,,,,'vfe,:t.',,i;j,: „.,:. 1.,,L s-, iityil , ,„Ai,.::,. „ ,v„,bilp. ,.„,„ ..,$,,,,. ,,,,,„„:4,:ii,.„,,,,,,,,,.....:.,:,„..,...,-,,•.r:iz*,..;,",.`. 7 :., •1,', :, „ ‘4':'*-i lit'."4..t #61.;,044,,,iy,'„':,,,%','•.:filefilte.- elt., .-,14,41,igioit,,y,14,04,11i,i?Mit4'itqi'c,',.;YTIAci 44 tt113:14(pip-i 4, ip::•.....)(1,17-kr„,4,11,„, 0,1c,, ••:, . ,,,,, . ,?,.,,,, , toii, ,t, Jitc.4**,..1,`31:q,of ,otitic 4.tari:),:oToz,f4str ', lit ,;...-1,--,.-i-:::-Al.,-,(*.:,,,-;-. 1 11, ="7"' (-=4.',t,'; ,eiri...4:,',:itr'414','6,1,•,',4' .Iktit Al'Arlif.iii: ri. 0114,. -,-ily 11,,,I'l:' 1.-.1).It, ,4i,..i3,44'..,.-*'''".-I1,04 ql,0 I..;'44:.i r!, i',RF0,,,,,4.4 0.,=,,,,,, , ',,..0.,, ,,..'„,..'..'a %.-,.,',. ,-,,7 ,it,...,,',.., i'iatudc,,),.4,', „ol ' , ooi i i.,q.,,,,',4.4,1',d,. 9-Viotx,11,I.t 11,;.,..„§ris,,,R.,71-..0 yrit 1,-4:... kit-0. -ii,...,i,:•.,..,,,,,, ?,,,,,,i:.::-, 1,44 ) - 1 .4 .40 ,i, ,-t ,0.t, tfrir I ..,,.,„.,,,,,I4f,„,,,, • .1,..„. , . t ..,.. ..1.„. #.4,0,,,,,1%,4..,,,i4ifoi);4 ,,,.,:ti,,,,,,F,•,.;.4.,• '' '''•:V47;.''.1.3..':4.'iltii;"fe,.'..4,t)..4.-:'i''''tt,140‘."3..i I 1.1 s4411'. 3'Pi, ,. !. ,14.11, ..ii,,,V . ?)14,1•T11,,1.441 *1'' ' -. ..•..•., 1.-',1 a' ',.. ',..171...t,,i',0;"1.k 404_, i•PligrArtif-'''',1'1•°:., ',,''.':••,'!.'0.•YPIPI.!1,i;7„,,,tif1"04,',11',i4:5rit'...,tV, afttC.1....L,'1f1-‘,1110.1.'koi,e/A.ts,,,',19,111t:',',„ ! .•,,,t,L.f,'07 d•7',III;:4 . ''*'.•'''•,:4,;','.,/,,t4-4:11%'V''',71:1.-■,„4".;.",,;t:,r:,.-V,4?',Ifi,1;•ii 1.,.,,i.,4,b.,..T4i,,,Y•,:i.,,,.,,44 4,,,k „„ A ,„'4,,K , •14.4'' ,,,,... ,.' . ..,r.A.-k ..,.14,,,,... .,.. ,.., ,f,1. , ,74,,,..,,,,d^'",,k,•. F.'"'•'114''''1774,141 li...:,:e11:44,i4.1■,:'nntVii:Vc?"&il'Aiii..v."i'lli'VAICIv•Ii0 '707-PAit.ii-it'.•V),.1-i(,,1: 1'tki.g. 14,,....s .,',. ,'ivt, . -\•Th3, .L:' 1'.It a:'I" .1 1,"1"' sh.,41gPA04.1'?;:',Ti-,;' ,44.,'.;, :,.,:i1.1,,,,,i1;,01,13,Vs,,,,. .• 0 ..‘l'...., i, -. .,0,1C,4;;,5 1%.,.'., f'.„,', 4•••.,...,i. ,,rAt.,,,,w4.,,.. 0 , - ,• ,,F.-,,";"",riN.,,,,','$.0":■7',,,,,4it'1 '''''''li'''' ' '','''''',....':r;''''''' ' ' ' '4' 4 ''''''i,'' ,:,''',:'','!',":':',:`'..i',„;,.‘r, ...,,I''.0A.F..ptY,V;;;,.,A.:..iy.,M.,:).•,-p.,.,!II,arlty,kit,:,,,,",? ,!,441..113.11&,1, ',',1,1,14,,,..t• 144 N 4 4.,,,,it,.,,fffswow Ji•14,-,,,,,,i/e,•,i,-,1., .,,f.•:-, 1,p.'•' %,44'.::: Tri : ."k ...+!':'.'"I ,';',,,:',`,",. ._.,,i ''.) '.I'l tliro:f!.r.S:4- '%,11.1:j:.!0,6'.,MV,',1$ ..4(),;.i:)." 'i.,'::11?;1111,,V,"fi',Tr,,,-*Att,fi f.,,4 ilf,,r yatow,g,;,,,,,,:,-„,•,'.,t,,,,,g,,,,,„ '..r,,,;,,,,v,,:,,i,,„. „:,.;, ,,. . . , ..,..,. -,.,,,,,, i ., :,.,,:, ,-.,, :„:; . ., 1,.. •.....1,1•,:,,,,,.,..;.1 ,,„'',.. • , •,,,,';;,t,'.1".:, .■44':-.,. .,, i,',,,,:v.7". , ' , '- .t. ,41,..'it.M.1.,,,t; 'i 471../13,„14,,‘i „•,'V4V,,„,!..,1i•iii,::,ii, ,‘..,, 't: 10 7'''.,"je ,,,,',,,4,,,1 ,' ,,,,',,. I,:''•,',',,,,,,,,,'„ , , ',1:'' '''. ',,,:,7`;,741:,6,;,;,'rf,;::71;,,. '. ,,,,,.,i(7;.,,,,.4 4,,i4,',1?-.00 ,,,„,...., lo ai..,,,,: .:'....,..,..44,40,,v,",,,, I(!,• nl.''7 , 4 4, i; A , ...,3:, - '-if:!, •rk,';'; - ,,,,,,.44:1...'"' '1/4. ..,;,t."AL l'IA vi,,41 fiv,„ i t P,11,AP'tr:,,.10,Mpi',,tiV',.'n.•,,. V''k.'..'1i,',;:". 7,1•471:.1,3iii*-l';',,,'•i'LY'ris • " ' n .„, ...4•;I ti4; P''' '', ,,, ,*,",',it r,f,,,,,",,11,!,-eid,V%ie,,.'r,1;;;i,..;,-4,';',;t:1 ,.''14:,14,°TO 0 :',.,,' 11,,,,r,i,V41,!..3-fg':nt',".,:oiri:',444,44,ttliate,„tei7,A.,,4.. '"fr(0',,'.i?e;,11";",‘,..'-4';*,'' .." 7,•,"'l.',.'t*.;'e4:':/;...:,.;.„.L.,..,.,.....,. ..... ,'•,,.„, ,) '‘.-.,.■,*-.,'"..,'"•••.'"-•" --,,:-',1'.1-• ," ."c.e.4.,r n. n-- 1'' ',d'.. e'• ''" --"-•''7.',..._•.."1.-• ...- i'. ' P A,,. .:7:1'. ,,'; i. .',1,L',. ...,. 0%,,, 4,r,,,,.•f 1'4:.„,,.,',II:..' 41',;;‘,' .."':a , ..',; ,,, .,.. ilialgratitallnallinarna ss. 0 REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS ig :' 1 , TO ► . O� ,,' _IA ±..x,41 DATE. January 0, 1986 FROM: 7$17ard Planning Department S • RE S 1.66 A request by LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN for a Subdivision on property zoned R-4.5 for the , pose of dividing 8.68 acre: parcel into 18 lots , - �. r with miriimuri 7500 sq., ft. in size. Located: Between Kneeland Estates r • � and Cook Park, west of Tigard High School (WCTM 2S 1 t4A lot 900) ,: Attached is the Site Plaay and applicant's statement for your review. From ` •r, information supplied by various departments and Agencies and from other R report and recd information aavail ;bl to our staff, recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Y • ) ' 22nd 19 8 Yoe r ,y use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return yciur COMMeNtS. Z. Imu are unable to ed b; the - above d a please phone the staff contact noted below th your caeA ments and nd �, confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. ]'f you have any , ' qUestions rega ?-Jing this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Rave 2339/, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone:. 639-41"may 1. 4. r ' "th Lldert or Deborah Stuart ' STAFF CONTACT: Keith PLEA 6E cHEe'r 4( THE FOLLOW/NG ITEMS THAT APPLY: k: N We have re Leveed the proposal and have objections to it. • w. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments °" ,..6.2 7 _ ' /`6 - .4...1:-...::11.....7,e__-_... -S --- ' 7...if....12.,.....--....... /40 25 -, PC.,„-- . . , ,' ..„,, r c •� c 1 , , 41,..L.,ef.d. ..:,-/-41'1,......e .-1,.......--.._ee-1-7 -,e __,, _,..._._14---6, =,...,_c- , / k / fiso, 1 „, //.,� �,,, R / , g Al t..., ...., :.wwa ,p„ likrAIV lr.., Ls, Nye of Person e�na�at i ,^4►,. � Phone . Pr / �, �r q r w : a 4'4„.! w J,i:;r +t h r.I.: it. � t r na� td y '} +tn t s' 4., ,�(I . a ,.,,,f.,,,,,.„IJ�a !�� JAN I 1985 4"*.'` '* ..4, 'r , 0� S @, FAR :s., �6�R1C' , / �, ', , , �; TO: -'r / A(. i� 4� DATE: January 10 1986 �j r� r^a� �ti FROM Tigard Planning Department ' i X K r , 11', { t 'k. ! 44.„, p� 7 S 1-86 A request by LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN for a Subdivision on + property °.k zoned R-4.5 for the prupose of dividing au 8.68 acre parcel into 18 lots , 2 Lot { °' 'i'a with minimrm 7500 sq., ft. in size. Loc Located: Between Kneeland Estates :1 , t ,h �F,t yh• r • 24,1 „4 ;'=Y-;r' r,' and Cook Park, west of Tigard High School (WCTM 2S1 14A lot 900) • ,y F„� .- Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From d! .. r! '' k`fi information supplied by various departments and a enc ies and from other tp ! f i+N rl information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be ' N y,. Y. prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in th•. near future. ,r, y danuar t :„'�w" vt 22nd S6 need your comments by Y K If you wish to comment on this application, we µ. , , , ^ 19 You may use tlspa►c= provided bayou or attach ago r �= t'�;��''�': A p� your If �+oR� ar°e uroable t� ryda s�aor� by _the tY W separate letter to return our icomments. _ ..,,,1,,''.,-;'...'',�.''• '' aPao�da date. please phone true staff contact noted below with your comments wild ',{ - . t' t, }' confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any pi �,•,H = . questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Da. rtment, P.O. a! a t I q Bore 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. Tigard, OR 97223. Phone 639-4171. 1 a i { ti, !• .'° 'TAF C1�1'TAOT Keith Liden or Deborah Stuart 1 °� -'. -- :4-aA. PLEAS! ECK THE FOLLOW/NG ITEr$ THAT APPLY: ,, ' I .0.,-- y We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it ,1 ei M, Please contact �of our office. ■,i 2 ' , Please refer to the enclosed letter. ! , .1-*r ..mow°.,.:. M, w "" r :4:,':11, *. Written comments: 1 {1 . 1,4),,,". 4 u �! M a �H Y l,w.. 1rww,I..gi.AAyy,,. .. _ ._ •.ypgy�wsp ...bile 4 1:1'' N r, .-m p c t earaarommenea , N .. ._. b 2 ' . � yllA V Oellp,•OOm, WOO..__ :. :_ S, , M li! _ ..._ { sursmotteme, ..,11 M y .; A,a Name of Person Comment i_ .. f dti:ril'' l�a ,0".,i ' kt 1„• t `t. ' i,, " Phoho ern. 16.9::,,,„,,,,,,,,.„,_x2.A.,1...„.„_,..., l L , , ,,,k t ,i ,„ ,,,, , , gip• >rr+.r ',.d' (KSL. /O356P) i': 4 ,y., r� fl N`�4d j�l} ${ .v.,"')*, L •... J u s .:,,..:4_,.._:.. 4,•.. UU _.. ..,. .... ., � : . IM A uii w. � . t r 4 r... .i a..t._+r ,.i Y Td J a... .'.,,..A, ! ..__ "`t'_. 1 ~ "I'',. '"!'T ,X. .M:•..': � .`..T.!.w._.'; 4.•. ....,, .r 'n. S a i• i ! ,, ! .1,,4 rf., , ltin: xw. J r w + _ Y:P �'nrt M1 1 w :M 7 N:I , p 4L ' ��@ 2 .Yh�1 n" ..1� t' ' ! }t d d! 't "!a ' "}A� a3;y Rt,-I� ".4 '') 1 i ro +i A 1 :. ,. „ lY.....,, .r-!. .:+ ir'-a ....'{� w.t.t'..Jf +^..� .), _'3)' v r+r� ..'ti ,.I.JrY.i.., M•t�,1� ,.. ,. ,4 )+�''y 1 4+ HIV a ti � y �'�'r 4.I *I" t..4' ,f lore r 4 _,: ". KNEELAND ESTATES III ,,; Ae.A r•N A'r,d „.-.,,,,.. -)i Ii • 4t A, w. , �r 7 APPLICANT STATEMENT � , sJ ,Iw Kneeland Est w tes 111 r�r s given preliminary approval val for a subdivision ,. y+ t4'1 {,J iJ� w �'!,'-' in n 1981. The approval was for a combi.n' ti on of 22 attached r'nd 5 `" n r 'p1 `t,F, ''' Cie w detached single family lots. ! final plat and construction on plan were G r J f�+tr ^ rl.' +Jq.. 4 N +' wr* `I ,' " completed but the project, was not completed because a �t� the change in .d , .� eccnomyo .� r I. a ..,..,r ' 4.�er .,,wy 4 IiA 14 qi M• li•4r J s n '}{I •y 'i r�„F :•: , �'�N' The present proposal is to subdivide the property into 18 single s r A J` ; ,' e ,i�µ ) v I',I'/s r.A y family lots. The p resent zon i n g i s R 4-5. The pr:p�s d project will e ° ,t, ;4 4 ,, ; comply with the requirement for this z t ne. The mi ni muk. lot size is , a{ {{, +I ,,...r .t r ,.,' vu; t III " , 79;oo square +e eta, J '''"1!a fit' '' 1 I( atJ� �,J i1�iy)r. : ~The proposed subdivision �-b �ta Kneeland Estates �d. t� the north. 44J ` .t r ,.. This pro j ect will complete the cul dg eac on SW 93rd Avenue. Copper 'a� „lb• '"" ,rug = 7 Creek Stage 3 subdivision vi si an lies to the west of this property. The , r; ,, '` 2'...'.','rc `.,, roadway constructi oo wad 1 l complete Ri;verwe ad Lane out to S W 92nd , • ..� . .} Ave nue o thus improving the traffic circulation for the are��=a awl 4' ,.�'z . .- , 1 .t.1 T. w‘; 'J , The property slopes- from north to south. Slopes up to 3O7 exist in s r . Yy u , �1YY uJ ( ,4 the the northern portion of the site. "E', r southern one half of the r property is within the 100 year flood pl an and is proposed to be left ,.1 J ...I r•t� +Y n i • � r = in natural state. r .) Water is available in SW 92nd Avenue and SW Ri verwood Lane. Sani t:�ryy `} sewer s available from a line running mouth through the project t f r oe 1 Vi i , ; 46�; ° y , 7 .* Kneel and Estates 2. Storm drainage will include collecting drai nag J, 4,, r sJ r. '0'. 1 it• Ik IAt r s ' #; ;i1i• al 141 tw x e '' '.,i . «...: ..., a ,s.. ,,. Iw {� . .. -.�. ,, '� s , ..: L 1. •�w, >,�-. y .r rr d 1 r r ,. ..t >4, ., Y,.'„ .,,t ,» '� ,...,:. �� .k,•..:. 1. -,. .. ....., � , .� r'. tik 'r f 1 4- - N N'� '.1 .v• w,• n¢4., vl�!, t . „ .,.A ;;Ji'_.,. . . 4 r.--.:�: ,::u..,py. ..,?T 1. ..1. Y :. , u4 .l { •J .,..,. Y • a -� s - ,.-„rt I.. . r �. Yy. ...�'W. .' ..,-..,...+ 'yy- 7+ .M�.. a' A.n-. --.._-..-.. .-:, .11*"' k ,,. s...,.. .it re:.=w,1.,....i. AL i. ..... L '4,1........1 �.. 4, Y , � '�'^ '� b,: . .� . .: .. , , r. � Y ,..- h d sr y 11 f * • - 1 , ............ .. ... r J .. . -.- 'N. a .,. �1. .«r.. � .,S.h':iFx it �}. {1 ___-,. . _-_ ,_..,�._t i .,. � 1 d e -:1 , � ,.,. i" 7 �l- M rr w �+ + y rw�,� '4°' In t ! 1.. -�t .�F.., - _ . .. 9•., ,.. s,'a r �^ �;�� , W ti. ✓A � � a + � to��w wY s � y r + __ i -___ � C. our.__ � .-4�t ��: r+G -:1, V..t ,�' JY�'_'i�t t��Ml,TMi .��lti�w71 Y�4'l.uj'r�wl4�,ut 1;,�I'r „+"J Ey.•r-,17 4 I1 t z k t"9 it + Ilfi i t , ''T ” t." a" y�q 1 . t I fft rW. •2•�,, 1 ,V r Y r 5 r 1 's.. y 7a,.�ro."C LL.'l.! ati v . . 1 4 A1`,J "yv r V i i'-` M F y , w~ urx}tr , �t a i t r .l e? W f ' wr Y t i, + � 5 i,t '.r f "e a t .v r j r T r / 4 r a1!V'••f 1 Y1� A r'1 1 "�t1I y p.a ry 1'" 4I '• y+ t I • 47;1 . . . . 0 . .....,-..,,.:•'.a,, ` , • ),1 YI 61-p t • t t aw id te the n �a 'r�iro ►® running x � .;•`t :C♦� .k' i• • A X N � c iI Mt k 4 t tr • 'Fn •, W ; ..' c, • l.tt v .'i`J C " y ,t:,..r r.y1 g, j Y 7 r• i• t 1 J`' r' 1,,::.' ^ . t .. L t H;7 t, G p •t r w l •';!•'..'n l} ! ,M i,u at M 1 G t} w• 1.L • w:0 p J A 1. v p f f iwi. :;w � .J• • vd ••f 0 �r /r: ," :. T Ira A, -h" Wh T 1 " S.y w1 , 7 •L 1 H A r li•r;. 1 'r YI 1 e i 1". ri i! u, Wt' u .! . ., 1 4 J •• /t A I 4. t j 1 1y,( d 4 L r G`1 b i, •fX l";Y y H+ N IF5 y ,....;R ;.k.� �., •..arm .. �.:." . -.. n•." `x, ,.. . w.�., ,..• ... ..:, ., R... ».•':a I .. 1.. « q ,.w.. w. , ....' . 1. ., J ..i....a� �.., i11'';, .•„t t'_ Iry �:p., _ s.., . .,•,�.� � f IY'. ,'. � } u, ( : , IH.< _� + , ., ,, ,,. a. 1 u .--_ r,._ ,..1�.� L. ..,! .� ” � :1M. i ,.., ,. . .., •..... an ,. i� .... c .,u.. '.f1rY,. ,. � ,!4y,•" ''d __.____mow_.,...•., . w ...r . ,.. ... ....,. ra .,,, .. �5,. :.t. 1..,. ,..�, ..'. .,« ,.,. ...�!. at;. i^,. ": � y•.,•ra"'� }'1..,:. ...,. , •„t, ,.a.. ..., ... .:• ,.; ..,.. r. �, 1 -�''. . �..... t.. . . .., �..�G ;.4 `la: 'd ,N�c:;.�_, _ ..r . :ate.. .�.:W�4 ,,. .„' , r_,, .1 y,,, � .:, K s �, !4+y".! i +n, 1 !,y,. Y* ( s t,.. 'Iir , I. ,X,:r �,.N�.,� _.__ �:?d.• ,� sa° .,.1 Iti a• .f �. .uy.:': 6! I.d.y;'y it rr/� � a .. 11 Yy' r +: -'h • .y,� , ^ !1. j �1i'.: a.:n 1 ll.. As, f Y;: M ',.?. x a * r ' u: tlyG .} i'7 y� / a. t :'. .x d I 1 t �� r ” t� r L.I � x''' r 1 +.rl._ c •��t_. '�J 4� ,_"`�k � M.1 1 4". ;�� yl� t K t f�f �r Z,V y�t p�4. h, 4n'j 1LI`^ I.I�" �M`', . kn r• ''i.'y X 1 x ,M 14z . ra PI M•.„,n",.. ~l; • tiaL IJ•, S 1".'' ‘57'''' '' .. .. r ;:I w k ,GY t 4 ,. w ems” r r r,J a ,te., .._,e.„.04 L � "i C 'e ;.,/1 S N /4 I JhKJ! IJ2lLy C TION: yr "e +r,tJ��✓' ! / , Ir- , , V J A ' �3F / .,µf r _ / '' a S pr ! � aJ r ,t .J ' r .,..r uJ ' rrs(/v .++r. 'nron`"1`" ./1iJrl. ✓JJ • I r f N t r� r a...'I,o y4_ . 'o J�� q Ea--�"...MV A �1 'A Jr* r / j f p n I . i,,I,.',. ' ',• La ~ 4/ 1' ? (4000,'!,40.1 / w r ' " � � J,74 41. 1J1 y ,,.p / , .r , f DECISION. • Notice is hereby given C err ;••` ' , ' I � Y g haL tfie Plaranang Oixectc�r gor the �i�y of Tigard his + f, . ` ,"1 4'r '' • rJ' nM w r c �,,', ;rt'~c'' 4°r ,c Y 1 ud''''...—:•Z%;',`,`. >w' U•*,' : ;:+: ; APPROVED the above described applications subject to certain � ;�� , conditions. i, ,:„.V...:,•' � l ' Yv T i'fy n cp icationa D Y4rr�r[w y APPROVED a moth ed vro oral to: * :'j 1 ( 1 iJ n., tJy subject to certain conditions '' i • i,' The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are `.: ra � ,is 'ti , noted below. yJ e f'+4 hrllm x1l " ®Ir MH JMr. 51. l_i A r' "� u( Vi NI x(11 -,.,.I Syr', UJ 1 fi, w r, f:: I , y ft r 1 1 , A'• 51 JDs '.': t 11•, ..r, .1 I n.i-.--: ___,".,.•.r._.:a-,....-J.\r ,..,.,i., l._. J-...._�: .,.r ,{_..r.! t.i,_. ,:i... y.a,,t Y..'..I,.-.-..:...,..'�.,,�,..h_....._-.y.._..,.....•r..t•�,.J I..x_>,.:.,t,F ..,r ,.•"tl a.K 4..M W ro_�l�,1..,r..�6,.�.,i 4 . :S:4,•9 °lx...;...,.:J a d r"r r-L e,.,=1S'•.J��D/I.A.1..�:6 w 1:r.,_x @ 6.��v.,:w..• ,LL r'1!1,.�:•+,,•:w't ;y.'."a`t:4 r I t+E,y—r t sA J�ut._•4 i} 'u{{a�.I.+ "ri J r fy 1"j•;li'i y•`,"A P� rJr.;1 , °•;y ��. 1 I„. .:.,,,, . ..- ',:1-',.,',.J ..... • 4,,,.,, ., ',..,'';',',,,, ,,,,, .1-., ,,"!, '.:',,.`.,:' ,..:,, ',•;',,..',..',;,rf...',.;:t-',:.2ir,,i, . ----- .. ,.,...,-:,-7,..., ,,,::,,,. '.'.,,,;?,..,i',..,:=::,,:';,:.' •,: `,1'73 „,....„,.,,,,,.:,,,,,),7i....'L' ' ,'',..-':' ,. .''7'''',.,!;',1',::i'''''''i,:',":,".,".*:,i''.,7'.:'.:::.`;,L',4•':::;,'''..''.-:.:::,,,,',',.,.',. .:', , ..,c,,,,,,,, ' .:::::';':',7,";;.':',:'..tiif. ,,,,,,,,,..,;1,...',,:.,,,..;:..,,. ',.:' ' , i , ,,..,7:.:.,;,,:;:r,..:;:,':.',:,'.,:.,,:...,):::4;:,',.,,,,;,„:,;;'; L!,.,;4,f,,::p.',i,',,,-..;'.:t.',::Y,'.,,,,:•,..,.•;,,,,,":',..,'..,;.:1:::iif...,,','.. '':.,".',;;,':',!.,t.,:• ,;!:..,,-.`.i,:.,T.„,,,1 „.....,,,, „,..,.T,..''‘'," _.,,,.,.,,,,.,...,,,,,,,,,,..,;-,': -.: i'l;''' :''' . ::,:',fr,-;:',;4:,:•,:.,:.:i,,:-::.:.,:;,.-:i: (1', ,,;;.',,,...:,.';'...i'',;'4:...',??.'1,',!:,":":.`!";',:,:;',,i":,',-.,:',,7'!,',.,:',1'',,:',:,;',,::''1:4,' :';',.:-''''''':..'.,i'''.',:;"2',.7, ,,:'.:'•::':',':';1 . .,.,,,,,;.,:r4.. . '''' '.'''. .._ ,..,...,,,,,,,,,,,,...,:..-!,•f,..:.,.,, t,':;,:,:;;;„:,:',,,7:.,":;::;.:*?:,',ii'i:,,,-,1„,,,.:ii•:;:,,L',, ,,,,i,,,,,,,.1,.....:; ::-,,,,...,..i 4.t:i',,,,:,,';:.7..,7„-,....,,,,,,,,,,i .:::!•,„7, ,,,:i.',,, .,,...,...:,...'.., ,:: .,. ' ',. ''''.'":',.:''',i,.,'-::: ',;.:',,',..:.'...,:i,l,',,',':';',.,.;.,:''.''''L,',.',.'":i,,:.",..'...•,, '.:',.''-,;,-„'`.,:l'A.,,,'.;',,.;;,';'..,,j...:::::,,', V.::.'''..;:".,', . ,'I''.-7..:1:”-/,',..,...n.:''',4...,'"!,.,',,,'''.;1:',.'..,*.,.,...-.,,,,,::i,-;:',,,,.....,,1.,,:i,.,.,,,,,,,-,:,y,,,,;,;,:‘ ,,,,,..,,;,,,.%,..,..,,;,,,,L,,,,:.,.;,,:.,..,!.,„:,,..,:,ii..,,-,..i-,7.7,.;..-,:-,i' ,, , . ,.'2,.7t. ;,..''',.-'''''''''''''''''' - " , ';‘' ),;.'' ' ' ' ' 7i'' ''i:I''''''[.. .i,::' . '''.:;:."'.'.". ..-., ,. .,.,,' '-'.,;t . ,:?:' "" , . , , ' '''''."''''. .'' — —-777—— — 0 , *,.,.:.-, 8 5 0 14 0 2 0 1 .:,,7".',"",,,':,:i.,..;',. !‘:: :'4';.:;.1'.,';'..':,,'"',',,:'..';'*'.,..',.1 ;;;;.,,:7,■., r7.,,,,,..,::.;:','",,,.'; ...1.''..,"4..,,,, ,,,,,..,'.: ,o,„'.,J,-', ,i. '' '.,.:.:11 4.,,.:k,. -.,-:. „ ,',,,„». :-,,,,,,,I.,-., ,,,. '• '0110129” te .*':".4:'■.\ 121):::';',''tt!i:'7'''''''' ;','''''-i', , k, ;;?,•:'':;.74', ;q,;:17,44, ,.,,..,,,,,..,,,:',..i._,;*.' „„,,-' ,,,,,,......... ....,1 Nava :;i1/4,,;;;,'1'1,,,,,',`::"--7,,;',_°;',. '''i.:;:::41';1')'4,4', y'";'',',''.,::';?'''''''','',"" b1,K,.ic?!:14,',.':,;',Iit":''',...i,',.':- *''',(ITA,.%•74'"*. "-4'°'''' 'ir:',:.i.1:;'fi",''.,..:,,,:44',',;':,. '.` ,' '4A,',,, ivt- ,,, in.,,,,,,-,i:c.: ,, ,',,,,,,,,,':.,:,,,,„'fi,: 1,,i;,,P.I',,::4' ;,-,4.,4; ,;;;•,',. .•41+..'::44 ..,. ,!,,4,1' t''''..''.',',:,',,,,443:,'4„: :.:?,4 ,'...'.'.... .-4''' ' 4',.., . , 4. 4., ... ..' -,70.4,,,,, ''4'1, ''''''' '..i '3'., :4,,4;',;:"':,i',..''''''',..,.; ;L:4; ,:3".3'. .4.;, :,,,,7-',:,.'',..:.',:,','',,ril':,fio,'re,.;0.'. ,,,,r..,,,,,.... 1.7.::.,..,„,,,,,,.;,,,'„?',,4,"';',,,,,::,:,..',:'e;,1'',.-:: ',,''"' ,,. •„,',. ,.,,r;,-;,!,,..,,.,4, $ by.'d b'e7"al" rkitiiSltiitit...3'1)13RI:ITrt.11104.Zra.i---Alddidlie dtili' .26th i.....44,;t:ilk,4,..54rPte442cri,,,care tkdatti.11910....x,...8 .,' I. Loads. 52""Ille.,..., ''.:::.:,'„.': ',''''•''.'''.,":::, ,•4',;,•';•• .6,-,.,,,'.2.1. 'i'.'1 • •. ,,,. , ,,., t':'.!,.,"'''''...,'''':''''.;•'. ,,,",.•,*.',,,,,4•,,,,,',. '*'.:'''''''':7','''':;••!;:*::(1 ;','''',.'1'•••t,,-4',,,..,'7,4t,,,',.'.,.J r ixsa.-14,...iii:"'..Gri:,,""::,,i'm":4,1:11'4,,,Tot,0°"bs::,iti-„Taantritorrtfasitssw' grill i '.,,,'';41,;",,.,,':;::',;,' ';',.:.,'1-,.,.:•%.,.:•:::',",','''`4;:,:i ,!•14::;":..'?'; 1...,-',,,‘,,,,:',1'.,.,i..",•;',..-' ':'T,;';'';;','' ,:'. j. '1'c).;;"-:''''..,',...,,,.,:;";;'''Et'; ',.!i''■•.:.1',, ...1".'";.: :,;''4".;`'-*,-,1,;:.,,;',,,;,:;', rt'.'1'`,';',,,,';'■?,, .,,,:,‘" ,':..''''',',,';'','',,;;;,',., ,,..:?:+;,;',..'.'',;',,:'''''':'"::.;.,''''.;'"''''''.;,•!`;.'''';''..' ''',.;' 1 triaohinic too Col Co wt,,,it.stt,,,i 0,,,..f.f_.„, &mac jar nity.(,),Ircei,..47,,,,, ,,,,,,_.. ..,„„?,,t ...,,,,,,':7' .. ,,,,',,,,,..,0,,,,■,:,,,i'„,„,t,',',:,.,:t;',1 t.,a 5_.1..,,,,,,i4.,..::z; 1:.:,t,,,,,,f.,,::.;-:,*.,,,,,,,, +a.if`-': '' ''''''' ''''4' "'''''' ''''' z irt,•/7",44.$ hi..'1,4,?..7:4cg,‘C,I,.41a' L.344' .:..*,17 )'',C,',fr:;;,''V.". fi 1',.:; : .,.,,,,P.,,,'^,'±',:.., ,,,,1,,,.?,1,:,. ,,,,,,,,,,:,, t .,,,,,,, ,,,4■•'.i.+It:,-;'.;':' ..,:':,•,',. ,,,,•,,,7:i..':,;'''', 7,.'''',..:,,'',,",11: k#1'''''''''•'''''"':•:'''':'':•':':".":),' „'•,:',' --1,,,akin, corP ' A, Y .,,,, tiarch to.„, ,ii.xit'...........'' 4. :;,,i,',. .., ,,.,:r.''.'?,,,,,^41,,,:,:',:,%-,,,l',''.:,,.''':',.'. „,,,, ,'.',,',':;‘,,'',•;f.,i■!'':''':,:,'„,,':' ,,„11..1 1'' ■ticultm.4 k,', ;;;,, 2;1',.:''..,'''' '7,',,I. '''''''', ',"',.';' ',,i,',.:9'i.;.'''','f'''''.':,'''''''''''',,724.°44;'''''',.'..! '.." ',.”:''' ,, oil 4:r t,444 tie .'' IA St411intda • ''''' i 4 th di,-- Di„„,„d,..4,...,,,*.”. , alrl 7 33 0 ard"''''' tal)P.iod'h*''"trY 16th c''''' a ig0,309.902. . ■•,,,,o0,1tfttd 48,1„„,,,,,,i.b..41"14'""' 10.-,6 a.:1 an'4" ivt 14...i''''"""'":1 ;. ''':„ ''::.,,,ii■,4f,,,,c:,■!:!: : ^-',.. ,*;=.1:','''','''''''''r'1;.::;;',',' .,'','',::01 'f'd■I';11'h:.''' "1" cir,t,!,701.*W.'ki' hi,,......,„rc,,, d ea.4.W 0,""4 . ;:•;::',''.'`.;',';',:',1'''',.` *-';',';',■''', . .',.,;,",„v0,,,..;4447rt ;'':;'',:' ,:,-'1, ''''' ' '.'1"4",1 , ,,',‘I , :'!.",,,; ;,.....,,,,.4.*4". ..s.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ut.td ,,,,,...„,,,,,,,,,,,,,b.t 4,,a ta.tit,.a..w• ,„,,4,..,.=iri,...., ,'•.,.. •,;Ii'''' ''!",r' '.•,j.:1.:',....7'7:::a';'''‘'• ,,,, ,.,, ":".,,,,:,.:7,,,,.1.-4 ':, ,,,',,,,,',',!:.,, : ,. ,a ,0,,,,,•4..tr. ,,_..putd,.bock ';'''''',1'..i'''':'. ••••'••'.:is',.',:"C-,'f:Y,i.,:,.'',",ii 4.'1'1.'•' ''',,,,,'';',.•''1,• '-•','''',;''''',':*•••';':.':'•"'.',-'.; ' . ., --,,•, '.‘'' ,,,,, ',,,,i,,,;,.1,,cs..,',, al''''' ',,,,,,,,4,,../.Pr'P'‘" lugr''''''.."$he*tio'7106,•kf te•"",,,,,I 14,:, a`,t.117.'",.....:1?c 0,.. ... _ ,:•'''.',:i',.,,•:',,,,,, '''!.,'..• ',"..-'; •;•.',' ',,,.'''.-,,'-',•'•,;,.;,.,,,,,,• ' • '' '•I'''',.'4•,;,'i.....0,•,.••,,,set N, 19 ' :,',.',4",`,,',"•';''',:.'''''J''■4,''.',:;"'",", 2.,"(tti,,;;;;;,;','',..4.,i",,,i,...;;;!),' :it" ...',....,,,, ..,,,,. ,„.„,,,,,,,,,,4,,,.;_,,,,,',,, ,"'''.' arr,I bft$hW it,:',:t''''lio Seht14:It:il..h:-'17°1'the:hill dooP".4*'.477::-'u di"'id"j.a"m'—' ks'44 4""in.arn*lt 4r. ......"'"• 1$5 ''''''''.'''"''''''''''; ''' ke l'ith"v aa4,1 4.' Y kJ Po t"''''''''' a5 firki 0.4'''d""* "'")" .001.00);Z/VIIIDiar-9VT19 '''....',.''..'.',.i.,..:,,...i• r:, ..i,':',,',1: '';'',..;..,",',!,;;':',,,.1 w,.;....'',..J.., , ,'Y . :t,,,,v,,p i-.,':1;:'.._,',,,,,,,,4140,7,.. ,,i,,. "s_ 04,o h..t ,fr,44 tut.„„o,,,,d,,tIkk a. ip , ,,,,,....4 dr*11,11% utter s 0.4 Gilt. 1,1,. -i ''''''''' ''''' '-'7• - , ,,i''''''''''",';',,e.tel A.,,,,I''''`" Aliklutat , Pwat-i-,,avi Bo... M,,,,„41,g„,„tito ■:.,',''','1,:',':',, ,7">;,;,:.::44';'-'3`./;'''..''-3..44,.....'1. ',:4,`(.r: 94 #4. ,,,..d'a""2''''„d dov c't ..,.4td pa*grite,ririrt43 ....,...,t.4,/...0,,,,...0.gat.u. :,, , .! ',,'',;!`",';'''','',•1';',',;.;''■i'l'',. '1•4;',.1",il'it'', ,',.. '''., ';';''' '.'‘t.I.!.11','",,.....-',■'..;:',"...' ''':44'''''""' "' ,',7'.4};'''. ,,"..10i , t,• ,,„,,,,,, — J4,44'4A:not bwan 1$, ,Z, LI7ealt!;4111; ici;,,,,5.1d....,`, ',,,,,,,,,.,,,/60''hi'', iimi,,,,, watikttaVito4 ..,,,',, .:"ie'.'r .',',,.',,, ,.,,,,, .i*.i.,4 ,;',,';',4.;,",i' ,r,: :!,.,;',,. ''''', :: ,,''''''.1',;,,'"'''' .'''''''.";!..',' ' '' *01.'4:,1';',71`,) ,r.°:,1:Z:g7L'".A.!ntfru='"' ""d:„'nhlith.,,,,,,t*'''p ''''art" t'I''''''''''''.',i.....741.;41.1.';': ."'.',,-'.-',„;'',L';;;■.„,,,i,":-",1 i.tr,, .;:,.'';''.'' :4;-?:,:i' 11'4,,n‘r!.'*Iii:'..t'il.;',`",.''''''''' ..' '.,,'■; ,,,; '' 1,7',7-?;'r:','- ')'''' (1.."7.7,1,1';',Illiff4tF,:irf;;ti,t,,id.i..sh"f.',07,,..,.„,in..i.t.rett,1.0 l'''''i % !.: .. ',fi'..;',"./..,;$4!"'; '',' ',,;.:..ik..1,',",;•''; '1,;''-'';'.,:'.,s,',..:'''.. ;..'''',.;*;''',4'.g,' '',41','', .,k0,,,, ',' ' 4,i,''''; '':,i ,i twi'e',0 J':"„,',.,,,,.a,,,,„,,„.,,,h,a I)1,,b6.,1:. !._,“•..,''.-' :::;;.■ ;:::::,k,!;:,,..4.'.2t,4,!:_,.„',.:j,ii , ,,,, .,,,,'..'‘;;",, ,.'tir.i.i.:,:,..;;,;;,),46,, ..,,,,,i.„,..,...„,,,,,11.:. ,''1''''':',,t''' ,',"‘',1 L.,. „,,n,,,,,..) ,,,,',,,s '4,,,,.,.„,.,,,,,,,, b,,N, c ...-, ,' "';',..;"' ', ",..'.r.,::',.,,',.. 'r.,.),''',,,'``.4,;,„': ;,.,,,, '; , , ';', ,,;!,..,,', .,,,,,,,',;,';,,-.1 r ,,,,,,,,,34,0"'4. r.';': 1 y,',';'''T, '.-4"..''fi,','''''''''.1.'. ,,'-',,Lt'44'4"'44'.': .'' ,.3 --'';'''. 3`-''''.:'..'-' 4■';',''...'''',?';'`.';''';;'' ' .'t,:'';'..";":",:'.:.t ,'. IL',' .'„:,%.,",' '',1'"';{=14,V' 0'.'; ,.:-'".'''Y x, 'ff:. .,',',,,,-,,,,;,,,,' ,'':,.,','1 4,1tti et.f4Vetv,ii S lilt =``7" ...-. ,:l.'iri,,.'1`,. ..'::.] ','''4,,, tSO,.,,i? .',.',.‘,,.',-,,..,'. ''' ''.•'''.',,,..'.,,,,,,,,,l',, ,.,`,,,..• i , •..c',''',,i'■' !,'4,.,!: ....,,''..,,,,e) , t 4'1''''''''.;.•''':'''' f•'":7,4t.,"'''';''..45:',..7.'dt!'.',4",,,,' ,-,'.' ,,..,•','i'i."'1, $ 1't'.;•. ...t!..«".''',',,:1h;,:4.;;.:.'!".''''''''..Z1 :•';',"'_''' ' ', .... ' ,"''''''''''' ' ''','.' ,", , : '''ff'; '''''4,1,;,4 Lir,,, ''+''''',,-,.•';'•t•;*..'Z'I fft,3:„.,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,),-,,,r-, ... ..,,, , ,,., ,, ,:.,..,. ,:;..,,,,,,...„:.,,,L,,,,:„,..,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,„,,,.,...:, ,,, ,, , ,.„,.?,,,, ,„,...,:f#,,,.,:..,.41 ,::„ , ,,,. ....„;..,,.:,,,,,,,:. „.„.i,,,,,, , ,,,,„,r,,,,,,.„,,,;,,,,,.,,:,,,,„,.. .i.,,.._.,.„,......,,i . .,..:..,....:, .., ,:...L.,,„„...„,,,, ::,,..,..:*.,,,z ..„..,7. .■,•';'' ' ..:,' ''...14'..'k't, 'r''''. ' ' ' ' ) , ,. ...', .. ,, i,,,:::•,: ,,,,,.,,,..;,,,,,,,,.,;,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,:,,,,,,,,„,:,,,,,47,v,...,,,:: s:,,,:,..,......altier,,,:.",,‘ ,,,,.... ,,,,,,......7.......,.,,,,, ,4,,,,, '.,:,,,:::::,i7 " i77„.......,,,,,,,,,,,,„! . , ,„.,ti...,• i 4,39.9, - . . ,..,-tataitiA' .,7;','•,,,o,,,'5,.,:,,,,.',,,,,:'••,, ',,,,,,i,..,,,(it, ,•,,,,,,.■;`,,::' i:,•;•,'' ,,',•'' '..,'L .:•'',','•k,,,•;',,N.,,' " ... . , , „,. ,,, ''',':•;',',`.;:it '1..„„:4;.'„ 4 .1 , ,, ,„,,, , , ,,,), , / k,.1 , . ,-, ,., ,,,, • ,, .,,4',-4:.4.i4,44 ,-;,,:',,,, , .,,,,,,I •,I,,' .,..,,,, „,,,,. , , , ''‘'t,t';;'' ..."':.,`,:. ,,,. t ' .• ',;:'''''::.'4 .;:`'.4 Vi;,, , .'‘ l';.,, .' f:';' ,',., , , ,, ''‘'' ,,.., r,"1.'41''' 4 , ;," ,,, , ",4'. . , , ,.i'i,'''', 'i'''''°'''''..G1, '' ,' .,''.. ra ,-,k,4x if t ,''..'. :: ,„'7.i ,.,.;::„,,..';',.;:$1, to 0,,,L,'"'"' ',„'.',,!7,:i*r.";7' ': '4 '',!;',',t;• ,,,1.44i:!(: ,1, ,, d. , ,,,,L ■ , ,.., .', 1 ..■It*4'''''',.'1 t'44';''''' i ' ' ' ''' ' ' . t.r.O'Ll • •-19 0"A' :',,:::.,, .t'',:'"•.,.''.'4'-i■','''''*:;.7' 1:,...;',..'1,:'''..,'..,,'‘.;,'i,l''';',:i) , 411 cazt 6,11,,A ,'' ',' . r''''' , t . r',,:,11,..,'''..'...' . ,''',':''''-';''..'^'.' ''..•':, I ' ' , 40.4" A , , ".... , I ■A,, ,,A, , „,, ., .„ '''r,.'.,':t ."1.'' '''' ' ' .'',',t'i.: ..„. ..1., , ;.',',;' '',..,4.' , .•.":::..t,•,,,'.:',..'_..: .'`:■:,,,,i,,,',;",,„;..„1 . % ,t''',' '!..,''..,,.,*.; , „„,..,!,„; ,,,,i.,. ;,. 7 18"' . , ,t,1' ':', ,,ki,:', 't.:1 tzt''' t"i■L.;4'.''''.' ',;t';,',:. .''' ' ..*:..'...,A. ; 'qt.,rAtt4kr..t3;El=c ..,,, f'■';',,,;,:',Ii'', • „' ', ' .: PJ2 ttIetPtl!ft: N4. ,; ' ',',.....1'. ' „:.,,,,,,,tvg4ot .r.4'''l ‘,7'3 1'.,4''': :'' ',..'. : '' '''' ;.%''...,,,•,''',:,':i...+4:''. ''.»:',.',,,',','',,';'•M3Aw 4,-,,,,,..1,5t.,L,,. A4toet...147'4 14'4'14'4 ;',, .',:.t'''' ''4',-:' ' ;.,!;,:',;;;.• ., ) tzt ,,i ,,,,,t• .r..1,4 ,-,,,,,-,. I i E' lit'.. in 9142;1 ;' att. ,....".*' '' ':•. '''','.°' 1''''; , . .•;',1r; ; '' . '.:'::'1 '';i1.4CQ1altS1414:.;10 Pott...1A, , , , . ' '' ; ' IA,,t)e.::100 P-tat.,,9tt.ql.,,A=t--. .----- ., '',' -41 :,.,,,, :,,...,, ..,',,,:'.,r, :,,,,,,.,,,..::,r;:;i':::4::, %1 ',,...:;:i ,,..'4..-,.,;: ,,-.., , alit,ows.1-,s11 ak_, ,,..0 , 34 glivis4la Lvl ;;;i7 09, 01213 ■ ' .'''• '' r,,.....)',,,,.*.,.:, :4 triZtt port t. 0 '" '''''''''''''''''•,'", '',1,'','.',.',':..•".'.:,, ;•1 ..„.0..i. ,„, op.. :'-:,';'''''.•':':';',;'.'.['' i 1:"'L • : .' ,''•,,.: :' , : ' r I, •• t',.: L1'0 14405 23401i374bk Clittaa to,i. I'' :: : ' ' ' '' •':•'',,:'.,.1'', Attf13,ttO ..„.„„4,4R31 ,..,,.. ,,,, ',', 'ok,,,i .ktttitp*.th- ' ;;;'''','''it , 1 '' ''' .''''V'''' ''''''- - et ' ''''' '' `D)7' . '' '' '• ,.1;:.,,t';',4,..';;''.,-;'' ) ir •', , .. : ,- ' , , ''''' „;.,4..... ty..!;,:: 1 I."-''''"('-' ,,,,....,,,,-..,„,,,,,,,, i r.,,q.,;.' ,.i..,.‘, '..1).,4::'..,,,,,,,',':„:,:,: . I .,,„,r..;.;;.,!,,,:$1,...,,.,',,., .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,„,.„),-,.,',,:,i'lt,.,,,:',,„.,,,.!:'' .,,,,;.44,;,,,, :,''.'''','..,,''t,.."';':4:••:,';',” ,..,,,......; ..;.) .°1a.it'',.'''t'-','',',;4;:::'4',,,,1",',',,,'":41''',,*.''',.&•;,". ' •; ;.i "tr:i-;,.', ',.,.01,..,....',. '.,,,;,,,.4;4'.,;',•,'',4".,,,,,,,1 ;,,,,".'',.,,-.41:' .,' ',L :.'.,L.,.,„",', ,..,,,,.. .,;.';','',.,„:2,1":;?..'„:.;.;''',';',C,;"""f.,;,','",;',.':'".•:' ,, . 1,,,,,......,',;• -X".'' ' ""**"."' 4.'. .''',.'";;,' •,'4; ,,1,.,4,i-„;.,4,,"7.-,.4, „" t''t',;.,'?';',.1' ',1 .,,,,,.,,'„,•;', ,,,',,,,'„,:!,',',';'''•1.4'.',.„,;:',.',.' '''''' .' ,.,,,,;',:.','''."'' 't.•''''''' *:•,,;`,1'.' ;?';'''',''.4,•''l , ..'.4,44.4,','Aii4!;4a, '::.;'''''',''".""t'.''..,' ;';'f'''',i'.'••:',"•114,'''.;''..'''',.4" ''''',";;;;.,•*,,'''r/41 ': ',.'(L'',II' ,'t.-::,- ktt,11'1'"' '''', ,.,..,,,. . '.',.,.',4",';:,'4''"':, „r• ..'1" ',.;'f'.1'''',' .'..,'7..)-,;',. ,,,,..'"116''.;',:',,:j..4,,',:`,'',.?, ' t,'.:1 7.i..::A'''''''Ir A'':ir'4.k''' ''''.'''''..,'.*' '4'''','.,'1,:',.' ,,,'1:1 .. ' .' , t,..'''''',.'',,...■, ,'i'l'....'..1 t'''''''''4'..'' . i',,,1 L.'' ',A.A,''.1,4-1.,.,. ; , ',„ ',;'' ,•, :?7,,;, ',.!.,,,,,,,,.•,,,';',,,,l'ei,,,,,,'.:;„,;,.;';,4,,,,,,,,..L.,,,,,..;;;,...!,, , , i ,,.''; ,. ■';'4;,;,' ;,'';',::;;ft'',.',;,,t.41,7:;'',:'",:,",:;',0' ,'.4.',':',..,'''',.;i!'.,',,*..1''-'1:,,:."4,.'',4:',',.'",''4''''..1,11',..:',t)„."."'.,4.'...F.'''',A.'7,12'f'''''`.".''' ` ' .,i!L'':''';.,'' '.■:;t:''.1'.. ;,..' , , ,, „„,,...,,„.,,, ,,,,,„t„,,,,4:,i,4.,',',.,,12!:,,,..'4,',"?;',..:;,,,.:;:.''i,,..,'...;4.;,,,,-,',.,!''',':'..:44,'L.'',,,',. ''..,,,,r.,444:4.4',,,4,,r4,,,,,,,-,,,,....ri,:!,!J',.;'...■:?3,,•!,..,!.42,..t',,•■,' !',',, .,,,C,.r,'.'.,'•.,;:, !.i,,..','',.,,, ,:,:,40,40i,,,:'.1;''',”' „I,...,,,,..:,IL.,,>,,,,..„,?,'.;.; ,i„.11,tf ,,, ! i4;i:::,' :,,,,.,,,, :‘,;,!:!!'47.!,;;447,3,,,;:;.;,:',.'i.,",,,;,' , ,,ri,,,:.,;;:f":!1:,:::;■11:•:''i':,:,,' ,..!,,t1,,;1 , ,. *,,I...;',i'' ''.,/,,,'' ' 'i'i ,,FII*,,-. ,•r, ',-.„ „ y-,.. ,,3'';, `,'.`,.",,;,'r, , A- . . — ''' '''''''' ' '''' '1''' ' 1','1 41''''''.,.t.. '... , : 'il'''''.''''.t :*. :',1,7,,,' '' ‘,,l`i,:',”,.4'■,..::1:Ft;,1',,.,,,.;.,.:1'i'''',/,'f,.,,,,,,:,',■*,: 4.,,,,,,,,„:,, fet4 .,...,,,,114,4,, ii,,,,...„...',,,,,,,.,,,,,,...',. .,.. ,,,,,,1,4,:.1,,,,,,,,,,,,;,..•,..,1,,,,,,,...„,,,,,,,„4.,0.',.''',;''..,;,,,,,.'..,';'',ii,:,'''.:,4..',''''':-,.*';',,,',',: ''. ,,,,,.•':4'''',:;;;4:',1.JA;.,,';'N'';,';'''f'-•'-'...,1,',....';,,•-•,,,,',t t,',';; ;.`'.■;;;'.;', t.t`''1,..')4'4'4'; , :1!;.',, ,,7.1,1,•".";„ -,‘;';;;;;,7'4,-;;"'',''‘'."`-..;..;%',.;.:,,,.•.',',h.;•,,'--.!";'"';.,'.:.• -'-'';',.; ;;:',-,4',,,.''''..,.',;..■`■,.`t,..,.,..',4,,,,,.4r1...,,,,,,,,,..,-,,,,,,:,:',,.,,,,..q,,-,,,,,,t'itAt';,.,;..„1?te,t,, 1''■it•.',.,',',t1..C-'--'1- 1!t '4?!'';";:'''1.J.,,' • '';''''''''i;:,''',1;' rk.;,, '1'"',,..'i4,';11..,''1'4:,7 7't?:'.,'..,:i li t';';,' :-',''':.:''. ''',t.' IS,' ''' '''41',1.'"' ''.1.`4,'''''''' :,:4.... ;it..';:: ':'''r''''''':,";.:::..'''.:4;•'''''''..5:::,t;''.!‘;''''''''''..".}.t.':'.'.'1,t'it■:'''''',1;:'''.''t:'','''',.t:''''.''''''''. '',:'!,','::'1,4..''t''''4'; ' ' . ..i, ' '*.r '''':',''‘e.';''''A;','11.; '''t,''',i'"!7,1it,,,r4i?'(:,:q1:,%::.,',,,,,, '.:.,,,,,;••,,,,'''.,''' ..A.,44,,t1:.,': .:,,,,?:,,1.'',i*,' ' 1, i. ..,, 1,, ,..,,.. „ I.L„7,,,,.J.,....,:i',7,,,,,,r,;_...,-, ----- , , „,-.,.'A 7,,,':.:,..;;'':,'-..'.';',1,.:1;' 1' ''''',',:t„:,.':,Y,..::','-, '',''',',•!'14,,,,,,.',',"7"-:'..,;,;-..,,..',.',.'.:::;,'"';',,;':':''P''''14''''' ''''' ”- .,:...,' .I,,,„.,..,,..,3.■,...r.',. ,,,, ..,, ',:t.„';',`'..7.,',.•:4''',,,A.,,:t1.;;*,',,,;,,,,-,,,!%;„*;,::',,,L,_,,.,.,',,,,v,..,,',,';',,,';',"',;;‘,'.'''',F.i;''",.''''4'`‘...'.'..,,,!;',,,,,1,11..:.'',,,,,:,,,,ri.'''..,.;,4.,„.'::,,..-,'','''' -' j.. ' tl,tit.i'..?,: ' ub\ tt Jll` 4,`/"''.„,:'''. � w US M"`y ,In {,y F. t1, 4 M i ',.',.'',1;4;.,:,*. -..:474..' e r`l PARCEL I.: r,' Lots 17-2e, inclusive; Lots 34-40 inclusive; and Lots 42-47 inclusive, « �,, a+y' KNEELAND ESTATES, in the City of Tigare:;, Washingtoo County, Oregon. �,, ,I,A •''‘^ PwARC CL II; - 1 n • •,l 1.I` b LLte 76 to 138 inclusive, e cape Lot 113, KNE7ELA4;D ESTATES NO. I2, in , r e the City of Tigard, County o'+ Washington, State of Oregon s 1M as `.. n PARCEL /II; of the Solomon e'. 4 eee et'e,"' Fticrierdson Donation uLund ClaiceneNumber 44, ntSectlonl14, Township 2; South, ;,r, Range 1 Nest of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon; thence ;,; , ; Ncrth 0°21' West along the division line of ceid Donation Land Claim 494.0 ee ^ Y feet to the No;sthwest corner of the tract conveyed to C. L. Shaverl, as ; recorded in Died Book 35, page 252; thence 8 uth 89°54° test along the North , �': r, I,)..4 line of saea Shaver tract and parallel with the South line of said Donetia _; '`, " Land Clair, 602.62 feet to an iron rod which bears South ("Ole West from .. ,, j an iron eipe at the Northwest corner of the tract conveayee� to C. L. l ever, ee t,':0':::".', as recoirded in Deed Book 53, page 195; thence Korth 0°01' East along the w ;; West line of the last above described Shaver Tract, 22.5 feat to an iron # ie rod; thence South 69°54' East 284.64 feet to an iron rod on the West line ;: ,1w,w of the tract convo ed to Tigard Union High school 2 wit., aas recorded , :,:r7'...,,,'', in Deed Soak 341, page 413; thence South 0°01' West aleag said West line .,1".:,,f;iitiii", 517.5 feet to angiron rod at the Southwest corner thereof; thence North t 86453 feet ettalthae the Ana entedn South line of said donation leases! claim,place 4 du i'. EXCEPT: '' , , The following deecr!�a trract of land being situated in the Northeast 7 Y ee', quarter of Section 14, Te,'wnahip 2 South, Binge 1 West, Willamette ri�dfan .'a , t ' Waihington County, Oregon. ,, " BEGINNING at a point on the North line of that tract conveyed to C. L. Shavese ', * '" 54'00"oEact 455.97dfeetkfrom being located Shaver tractt;; fi R: thence, continuing along said North line South 89°54'00" Mast ;Deed Nook .eo et 4,« 53, page 193; thence NorthS00°0l'Oe0°�East thanc�0 foot the the li corner to the Southwest corner of thattract aonve ed to C. L. Shaver isa as described in Deed Book . , page 195; along line ,+« [ :",o line ofiSouutthWeat East the West West right of wee { � ) �r x�r J,':4: line Bu.,th 02°56'00" Wiest 93.05 feet to a '�j4 inch iron pipe radially i�' t M' opposite and g way Center line Station 15+50 P.O.C.a thence. µ d 3S 00 feet from r 'ee; along the West g way N2 119.19 feet to a Wointtt ' �` eat ri ht of eaa South 24°06'35° lkast 119 ee thence,81°50'25"a n tees igh of f t 86°43'21° mist 74.74 feet; them , !r leavin tee right of y east; thence, North 37°04'18" Nest 93.79 feet; el ;T thence North 24°15'59' West 67.07 feet to the point of beginning, ; M :s':'!:',';',' s l 1 bona:1 W Ma.o..D wan 7 , . and vat and anomie Reseal m erne ..° , � 474! "k..,. Al XW'1 w mow W,mg.Ry% 4d�ya 't"`: :i1,4.11' 1 m a✓�". wrt.lei -, a1 �4 r 1:11''' 14 .{a` „Nt w G Mfg i e µ l a>t 1 p i �. 1 , , 7hy' i , h 1 i {m .� ,-14 i_ F e }l „, .I#S, eef x � i ,. ,,0.4, , . * 1''",.'«',',..'.', . '.4 ( u y.Yi , y 1 r k w ma ', '',Q,1'0 4,4'r� H 1 a! ,..':.1,,.'1 ! 1 ...r ,r a �I� MR:.� '1 {A� 7 ± ��y; '41'.lti.li,�w, AA` 4„. 41 3�la„x14 I 1,.,”.ff �c'( L ,n C ! ,i . w 1• ',� r ° i !fi,��- . y ! , „1x s u�Ir v�l y Say l �p r ,,,%. t."iw ''',.' `S 1 �� k r ,wr '�.W-'w w r: '4',,,,,',:'?;".4"A',,. * ti'' ' 1 « L i P ',-'i M1 *A )d .�' iku d i� w V 'i�l ��) N. � ,�aK « � { y ♦ a,, ::,:,:-....,;;Y;,„21`,1:4;',,,',;,,, a �tt ,,f,,,„,,,4, `., !,;w "1...."1":,''70.:'i...:,, '4" ax 3' ilk{Ix k i 1'k r'`w +ii.t. s .+r ' A' u y+i � {tl 4 �),�� iy')1,,,,,,';.i...,,.i ' �„ K� . J N,'f Y1 � � � a+� w', '�R ;2 A 1� 4 k i a�� s {'«r Y w t +' �1 .!„c y v +4,; 4w , , 1 +1a 6 x ,� .. Y yw' , .rf ti 4.1,..'4 a .11,, 7 7 ':lL l ,�,' ww,.+:1 a, vb f4',c P, ..!..e � t .,u, i w ' �r •1.,�>A.A4._.;,71, p., .".,, _.,,. u,i. .11[.3 F f I r iS ly,,u �`�M �' ^� " TICGARD PLANNING COMMISSION lei.— ` F J t {Hi.y Ip 7;i„ u '7,,...',. .;.? RE:'; ULAR 7EETING -- FEBRUARY 4, 1986 ,` ,,t'',.;,-;‘,'4,.,!.:,it ,� v 41. K {.J '•r t l 1, ' President Moen called the meet'ng to order at 7:33 PM. The meeting was ,,i• ,;;Nn° • ,41.",I' held at Fowler Junior High Schor'rl., 10865 SW Walnut, LOCI Room. ',..e ,,`3 * , u , ' ;,..,t, i ' ", , 2, ROLL CALL: President Moen; Cemrissioners Butler, Peterson, Setmann, 'r i ; h M ra l I c.ewman, and Leverett (arrived 7:40). +, A I ',"„let... 4 h r F yy ~', „ 4 dv;hf, Y �, • I Fyre, , ,, ,,,,,,e4..„.;•,,,,,:::1 f Staff: Senior' Planner Elizabeth Newton and Secrej„ary Diane M, 1. J 31 i hr Je1derks 4 f 3 t , °I 'w. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ", ��'` ; ^r Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Newman seconded to approve � ''kk4 ,,, s.•{<, minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioner ,, 1N r 1r�5',r r Bergmann abstained.. ';.ty{I. . ''r _, 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION: ,,, 4 N Y President Moen announced that item 5.6 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Pi) 1-86, ZONE ,�,; ;,..,., K.,,,t,,,,,;;, CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 1-86, SUBDIVISION S 4-86 had been withdrawn from ",IU3 r'..r:,,,;;',•;`,:�,ti,e^"�s the agenda. '� 1 Y,(�, F« I,, ,h yM j k , 1'� r wj tl C 5, PUBLIC HEARINGS r 3{, . , � F ESTATES ��1`�: NPt� �i �yku �',, ,�, ., 5, 1 SUBDIVISION S 1-86 LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN/KNEE Ll lots, a �l na min a lot ; 'i;;, ,` 7. Request to subdivide a 8,68 acre parcel into ,, w + . '' k =,,-''., -;`,0 ' ;'•-'''-.:1 ;�, , � .e of 7,500 sq, ft, , on property zoned R-�4:.a Res�:dent�.al 4.5 ,1.r units/acre) Located: Between Kneeland Estates aand Cook Park, west of a ' ' i -,w , Tigard 114.(Jh School (2S1 141, lot 900), 11. , !ih u�v r w a 7'u a! '0; ,J `'N ' Senior Planner Newton reviewed the staff report making statf's fi4i1,+'. ' .•- M• ' recommendation for approval, modifying conditions number 8 and 9, 0,0.N r L 4,'b I I , A? bi �. 11� ! w`'' i'., APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION a° :- ' Norm Harker, 1750 SW Skyline Blvd, , Portland, representing Lincoln Savings w �t�a,',' h- and Loan, agrees. with the staff report, He 1state y clarification�.d b willing r I requested t9~�e wo ' �h } tµY to dedicate Tract A for right—of—way. h ed to lot �.ante es F,; .4' , in for streets If public improvements w_ e limit g , , �d, bonding f r E� :.,1, 1,�"`. if builder could determine frontage for condition 11,, and if dedication is '3' w, , year p responded �{,,, y limited ted tra land within the 1 Ott ear f loon plain.n Staff res ancied er ; a, 0 .; that public improvements could be bonded, That the public improvements 1,,. !r �; ', 4 were required along entire property line not just lot frontages. If the A . builder determined acccq one lot could end up�one direction and the other *k y..4,, I. p ` 1 wanted t o ,,x� lot could face the o r .�sxte direction, which s what staff vvante 4:,,, . avoid Alsn the city head ih the past accepted proper Ly which was not ' ' A i within the 100 year flood plain, '1" 4'y4 µl.1 : , -, f i,`ill:ya` Y w III ,:, + y 4 r:,',`;' ` G;PLANNIN COMMISSION ON M MUTES FL BRUAR U' 4, 1986 Page 1 4 ,'; tit e ' t4 '34 *^-Al d 7 J 4 a..... M.. x.w..:'i �a 1 :... b«l __ t _._, _-x..... y r .1... r._ (. „_....-_, ».... .,...-, ,,.,•.. , .,r.1. y•....-.,,,. f Ya,..,:.:„.4,,,,,,$,,., . .,+..'.,.w, , .,.:. a nr.:7 i•:_.'J 1...r 4 M•1'..:—i,:_ , .;_ i S.t+ •.;i._ r, :. ..-_ .5. I_ rw- ;:. .., ,,i1. f,,44- L .. . a ..:. {, w ti. ,•, ,,:r,4,',. �x, WIq 4 k, U,.L -,...ti., '4x.,`• .f ,uLl„h,� ,�ut a, ± 1 ! ;� 4� 4 y , � t 1 , 1ti wr � 'i ipl�•n „4 .,.. , , , , t, ,' .,�," r 51°+ ,f a ii t ar ' � , a t+ � e�r�, C`Wk, ,..,,,,,,,,eye;,-.., e..... . ,- ,.' ,..'.. 4- .ee ,,,., 4'eee -—.e . - • • .. 4 e 4-. , -.-- . - . .... '1‘•*,•'' :A ,•. ,",...),, . r '"'.... ,4,.,„, t, • it0 o ':':■'''','.7-!,... ,...,';:e.' , ■..4'',..: ,4-.'"`.," o Commissioner Peterson Was concerned with traffic if River-wood, was made a ...!......,4 ‘,4,‘4P0'...,:, ., through street. 4,.:.',1,.., 't'' ',..."' se .. , . . ' . Commissioner Bergmann, felt the two lots with double access should both 5.,r.::::::.',.'..'''':'yf' :■'■,,':': front on Riverlgood Lane. He had no problem with lots 1, 2, & ':,,,::::. '''..':'''.'''t.,,■ , encroaching into the flood plain. Lengthy discussion followed regarding 5 A ,,•,:r.,'(., '0":. striking conditions numbers 8 and 9. ,.1,....0-,*e,:!..",.",,,:;. 1 0 Commissioner Newman felt the connection at 92nd and Riverwood would be a ...i....... .o.'...' major change to the character of the development and was concerned because , - 4 4 4''4..tr!*.,.',,t' of the number of young children in the neighborhood. He was concerned . -,, where the connection would he made onto 92nd for safety reasons. He o. 0.04 ,A.T supported having the proposal co back to the NPO, .p.,..e.,. ..e..., :.; „eel 0 Commissioner Leverett felt the criteria had been mot and was concerned ':',,',',1.',7. ,;„ with the 92nd connection, but not sure how to deal with it ,„..„„.. .t.„..e lee 4. ,..i.-ye,........i,e:,,..,... o Commissioner Moen asked about dedication of Tract "A" and the problem with access. Lengthy discussion followed. Commissioner Moen felt it was the eo responeibility of the entire neighborhood to cut down on cul-de-sacs, OY , :,,,, because of the on 92nd .* would e b fa'ctcessFufotrheemder:gecncy iov:heinclaesrafilfeicfeslttudys idewalks '.e. 4. etri,,e,e, .e e.., "'■k. '4'4 ''''' * Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner Petersen seconded to approve S eee. ..'el „... . 1-G6, modifying condition number 8 to road: SW Riverwood Lane will 4, eo04 '.*1'..,.,....','..: .;,t, ..,*.q.„ connect Riv ...erwood Lane with the development to the west (Copper ( reek). •• WA ' .• ''.4t1M%i 44,•" .; •';'''' Eliminate eondition number 9, Modify condition number 11 to read: Double -...... ..4',',,,-.','' '..,'/e. 0,..•.:', ,. ''''',1,:•"'"..1 frontage lots, namely # 7 and 8, shall be restricted to access the same . ..4'. ' P..11., ,,er . public roadway. Modify condition number 13. to add The Riverwoed ,0---:,.' . easterly access to be addressed after the traffic study; also lots 17 and e...:1'''.. .;:ie:.. .'. e. 18 be platted and that Tract "A" be dedicated to the City once the traffic study had been done, Modify condition number 14. by adding: and , .ii , property south of the road not platted into lots 1, 2 and 3." Also .e ,......:...e. ',:.',...e ".',.''''''', ,'.,..:;i'ir ' 4 • request staff to prepare the final order and for President Moen to sign ' :` ' ,..,.'..ey.:, :,... ..:',.. that final order, .., ..'•!, ' , Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioner Newman voting no. - -.. ., ..e-.4e.. -,. . ,,41,.tt • t,.,i• . ON , . . ...‘"' ' 0'''..■ 1• 5.2 SUBDIVISION S 2-06 VARIANCE V 1-86 ELIZABETH BUTLER/0AMUEL 6011ER NPO it 6 ,..,, .4- ,.... Request to subdivide a 1,37 acre parcel into 7 lots, minimum lot size 7500 e,',',. ;,1; ni, f.., ","•.:'..". Fe ,, sq. •ft, ; and For a Variance to allow a 600 ft. long cul-de-sac where 400 ':',- fro ,' A .! ft. is required, on property zoned R-4,5 (Residential 4,5 units/acre) e'e >. Located: 835' west of SW 93rd and 8W Inez (WCTM 281 IIBA lot 1400), 4 1' ' ,. '.' ...11 : ,T.'H; AT . Senior Planner Newton reviewed the staff report noting the concerns .e - “ , . c . jet et regarding the cul -de-sac-de-sac versus a through str et, he problem with the -... size of the lots, the need for a tree cutting permit, the bike path; and 4 4 ■.,' ,k,4 IL'. „A ;:_... made staff' s recommendation for approval with 13 conditions, 3: ,q,'''■ ,1 ,.1 " N ..,e PO COMMENTS... Senior Phuiner Newten i.ead a letter into the request from NPO # 6 Chairman -, '''''Ali,L,■;;'":"P.."tr' , 6' '■''',''' :',4.i,;''' '" recommending denial and that the application be returned to the NPO to be e, reviewed by the concerned neighbors „..... , 4,t,1 7,,1:`,,:* ':It'''.:' . ■ lo ,i,•:4',.4',4"r'',',,4 ' ,;e:''','' 4''', '4 i PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES rEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 3 e; ., 1,,,.3.,...4, 1' ",: sigt.,-, "6.' 1,.t,,,-'e'. ',. ..%, ":44',:,',.',:.,,:,,-,-H"., ,t1".. ,t-,,,,..'; '.. 'It.:,, 1%,',, -,",t.,, - '0,, .**Pt. .,,' .,.1 .. .., .., ...I., . 1^ , ...!.;'‘,..,...... ..,.„1"'..4 '4 '',4■ ••'%,, *4.4'...",,.''„.. 4.t,'"X.4:(1.,.' .,', k...,....:,,,■,. ..!. '44.,,,,t, '..:,:'.4',11-:.:A:."6',.,";'..,,',"k ,k,',,,...,..`:,,.-41.'',":",:','.., le.4''' ,, .." .J.,,,'Ioel.e*, . , ,,-,,e4.,,',.t, , , .;:•4 . • t,'1.•-• .. I ■4..., k , 1 ',...;,:'. i,;" ,.. - NPO COMMENTS l ,".'41,:. • , it ••, Or'.'4 4.44!'•111 .• •, • 4, 1 , 4. Senior Planner Newton read into the record a request from NPO # 6 Chairman , to postpone the hearing to allow for another NPO meeting. ' .,, :". . PUBLIC iESTIMONY e 0 ,4 —. •,, '...i.. ;P,,7,''.6 • e ,, n Guy Mounts 9500 SW Riverwood Lane, requested the people stand and be •e, 1...-• '• i; recognized who where here to support a denial, of this application, He . read and submitted a petition, signed by 27 residents, into the record „,., • e- ,• %,„,, ,,,,, requesting denial of the application, He requested that the meeting be .„ e4e.ie,,,,...„, set aside to allow more citizen input. , „1,,,, , , ., 0' ,r t-,,,,- ,,,' , , . ., ,-1''''','''- ' .., ,, ..zef.- ,I. o.. , 4 ,I..1, o Liz Collins, 16 ,545 SW Copper Creek President of the Copper Creek 14"'""`'`' t ft ., I‘ '0, Association, also representing residents from Kneeland asked that the - . application be postponed, They understood that Riverwood Lane would be a 9','',..r 4rs,. . cul-de-sac. They ' here concerned about traffic onto 92nd, that traffic 4''',■ a.i. ., ,.*,. . . . ..,. 4.'..4't:'.-t,., from Cook Park would use Riverwood as a shortcut. Discussion rollowed e,",, ee . e, - Jo regarding the street connection at 92nd and Riverwood Lane. “ele es:*e i!e"I."',.N ,4, 0 Sally Arroyo, 9505 SW Riverwood Lane, adjacent to lot # 4 was concerned 0 , e .• ( that the existing waer and sewer were adequae. She wanted a study of k, , . ..... ■ "• ""' 4: the Sensitiue Lands as well as the 100 year flood plain to be maintained. '- -.,,, `,./..,,',.....;.'e,,,' , 1,.. . 4.4.:-.1,, 0 Dan Lesue, 9540 SW Riverwood Lane, was concerned with the growth and the e 7 . - ..r. .,'. i ' '1` 'A'AA:, '44' q60,.,' effect it would have Oh the schools. Tigard High School enrollment is 'r.... already above the number of student?, that the school was built for. He = ..-, ,....ee. . , . • i. 13 was concerned what effect the traffic would have on Riverwood during , 7 games. Discussion followed regarding the School District not having any ,'"ce :The 4,$'1i't'' "'"- objectione, .°. A,o4. ee,,,,,, REBUTTAL , 4 !' e:.7..1,..'' OJ ..--,e Mr, Harker stated they had reigl-borhood participation through the NPO _ , i,e '• *,'-',1,. ,..., process and they had moved to sport the development, He had also offered to meet with other neighbors. He questioned where people would ete , . ,. .„, ,., ., ,,.•„„ r short cut to from Cook Park, As for the speed on 92nd, that was an . •'''4':1',';':.t,,'PL enforcement issue and rad not know what he as the developer could do, ...‘ n. e, o Discussion followed rev, rding the Water Oietrict response (no comment was .'" i received), portions Pf lots 1 2, and 3, being in the flood plain and what would happen if they were removed, Lengthy discussion regarding the traffic study and connection of SW 92nd ane Riverwood Lane, Mr. Newman , [..- I. commented that he lived at the other end of Riverwood Lane. e,.. :I . 4, .- e• ,,,,, , ID , e„ — PUBLIC HEARING CLOSE0 , C5 . ill o Commissioner Butler had no commont, '.)., .,, ,•,'.,' 'At::: M,' •V 1.". 1, 1 3 3, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUICS FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 2 11, .,,,, , , ., ,, ,..* -. - , ''..13. ,,fir' 1 . 'r'.'11"4 4,7 '14' 4'-'.',,4r 4 .■.' t'r'' ■,.' .t ''''''',it' ''{'*".4. i.•14' ■ 'f, ''■ 'i' , '" 0,,`,''V, ..,. ,.•.4.,..,!' I., 41. '''4 .„+: , *d..„' «, 4,... ,,,:,., ,..„ t 4,.ii.,.,,,,,, l't , i ,',,, ,,,,, - , , .. ., ..k t t ,•4 411 P'1• k. , i k.,,' '.4*,, "",, t",4.4.vrt:„Iii 'I,• ,i kai.N,:4,,,, '1,, ,..'"..',,,4,..er4"'.,"`I,''i,.? ,'"'... 4. ,.1.,,i,".,"44 a1,41 ',:‘,:',4"*.,'? ''''N'',Z' r '-4',,, ''', '' ✓ J . , r A ,!..1' J)J 1 4 ? ® SOCIETY �J p s'r;! r Hsi 00,1•+ - h'J S.X.:' -a+nr:•? AU .3 : 4, OF •.,�Oy /''�'�'•ty„ ♦®®® '�+ `OJT i. Irh.J� r I '-t m • Y. fkJr 5°ir . 'gyp O .., r �� - '�\4 A Branch of National Audubon 0 Society Ora tea rL• Cl/y 'A4. ,art PHONE 292-4855 tl 5151 NORTHWEST CORN. r to K .E,ORTLAND, OREGON 97214 ,'1,,,,..t,) rwr' k=? ' y'' MAR 6 795 ;,,£ t 4 .» City of Tigard r �,t1a,µ °'�� Planning Department Cu fY OF 1"l"GA() FL �r Box 23397 PLANNING f+ �0�i 1 yyl �O V tl � ��j++//�� a '...r.‘,,-" > Tigard, Oregon 97223 i 223 M0 «,ts s' 0'4.,' ' ,✓'T'}}ti Re:Kneeland Estates, Number , xr• ,` ,r 4,f ,'* I visited the site recently at the request of"a local landowner 4 ' 1 w, y d wanted to let you know 1 have some specific concerns about „,,f.,, f I x ,r 7yu � �� I 91 tit ',..''',":;'' '',. ‘',1 4 ' the placement of lots in ;obvious' wetlands ,i r Lots: 3, 2, 1, 17 aad 18, are all clearly within existing wetlands «f . and should�not b(4 built on If the developer does go ahead with ,wrlt, ..e l 1. ; ' iar 4.'6 develop these lots it is m opinion that 404 permit `' .J g ",)e required and you should notify the applicant a that this woull, y � , r .sthecase. t': . x' to 1) 1, As I have no additional informat'ion at this time I will await more ' f'i r +°•: information from you about the status of this project. L n " , L,tt 1 . • , 7 Y M 1 x M'41'',r ,N • tJS! tt , .; S ncere 1y, , r�R r Mike Houck t ,' ' J. ,. cc Jack Broome, We• lands Conservancy { F rd x;hai gene Herb, ODFW �... .; ,. Brian Lightcap, U S. Army Corps ODFW r::,1! � ' r;1 w,*? ��, -, ' : ', at:: ai ,t Aar'. • ',1?. �r 4.t rm + + "w, rt , ..t'« e4 c qt A. r ... .•.:. t (}-�__.•_'-�- ,. .._,p 9 —w..,....�.. ..:. s�., ,,....::........�1... ,::+ ,.,.:.....a.:..' _,9 r , ,..J,.-....:. d ne ......:..: ....':.. +,.5..r'e• . i.:"..1-:.t,.. l' , .:�„,. .•.'::r., ,t �Y,,N''.fI ."'"'.,:.:• ': ' ...2:.r ..: ri _._._ _-•._ ,..._ `+• ,t,. , ,•yf I .., '., 41'.ff. ^N`1 .,.�.+ 1 !➢'_,y 1 y. ' Pn s tw" "� "� u a.:,'!„t* „ � t h` A vY t 7A. h. m ! , ��fL 7r: it a« I A"r�.l I �tu A w i f� I �« rb,}j{. 1,L:,,,,,,,, a!F +wf 0 y+y 5��.34 r o x . «Y y r! �rot,:�r 4¢ F°1�S{ "L M' w, , N '''''..* 4,. . ,,P r i r Y5 i Hd✓ p'i.r p n Y�.r M k, a y J . .r•. +t..{.Ayy JL'uN"Y �s t ,,,,,,J �1 f: ✓�I y.i�a- {,'° ��L`� ,z 4.,i-4 + c T "k,"'.1•iv''w, t. i a� fi''w. i, M�� IF,°,°r°y 7➢" � {, « T 1i J Yn I�}•a t '�i ,rt?w`! fAlxw fn«NV,t,l WY4,..5 2:4''':4..S1 f ."1:1,''''.‘,•c.'.:,,:.' ,! r,, .*Ft' !. � b Y,tK ^+fie` t, », `�. }i at ' ■:,y f'+ '' ,.,.,, .',. a r,: I ,• 1 r�((��r ( �,r q ' `'� STAFF RIPORI AGENDA IJECM 5, i � 0 r # ° ;_' ,, FEBRUARY 4, 1986 -- 7:30 ca.M. t Fi'4:s;'„"ga;:=,J, TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION , , .. ,I FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - I,.(,I °' 108t5 S.� WILNUT r TIGARD, OREGOO 97223 ,,• rr. ,,':?::,`:•-..':,':'..„4.,'„:7,4:..,' 1,. .c µ G�+{L , r, �.r A. FACTS '_ ,".17,:i'+ 1. General Information zk" 4) ''f CASE; Subdivision S 1-8t ', ' k. ;_ t4 ,iI REQUEST To divide 8.68 acres into 18 lots with a minimum size of " , 'r , R „ 7,500 square feet, i, !i ' ;ter COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Low Density Res,i%intial ,.; , � r ,r ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4% (Residential, 4,5 units/acre) ' .r •1 APPLICANT: Lincoln Savings and Loan OWNER SAME '"� i' ;1. ; 102 ,n SW Grcenburg Road t , : _ , Port land, OR 97223 w�„;, , "4.%'t.',.1,,,,,',4 k LOCATION West of 92nd Avenue between Kneeland Estates N(7.. II and Cook "� -- c d'= tir7+� ,,,,,.„ ,,,. Park $ 4;:14. . ":,.,"!'4` 2 e Ba��wkgr°�.:urid x, rc a>.'. .•k ■se:.,'.i ';‘,.1.. '''1:, Preliminary- plat approval was granted in 1981 (S 11-80/CPR 12-81) for 22 '+,k attached and 5 detached single family residential lots, The final J,` was never recorded and the approval has expired, , A 1 y;', 3 . Vicinity Information ,' t.` ' >; �,. ;; Kneeland Estates No 2 lies to the north and Tigard High School is : R1 ',- northeast on the opposite side of 92nd Avenue. The C -4.5 zone applies ir ,, w to this areN. m The Copper Creek develo eat which is tined R-7 (PO) i (Residential, 7 units/acre, planned development) lies immediately west 1.�:.' y property. „'� � and Cook Park abuts the southern bounds, of the A . r• d,, 4 Site Information '. property presently undeveloped The terrain slopes downward from The i.s The ° ,,; north to south with grades of up to 30% in the northern portion of the I ,,' site, The southern half of the property is within the 100 year flood ` . k..‘,.. Y;; plain, r ”: }:tl r ;�,M 1 a, STAFF REPORT -- S 1-86 - PAGE 1 I 4 ;r . :_.-i-- :---..... ..___'. 11..":" _.._.. . :,. ,._,_...•4,4 ,.: ,., ,.. ;..i.;:.. ..,. .,.. � ..:..fi..,•, .W..4 , ,1 .:+.. k. . - , .� .,3�L ,a; , . .i w. . . �n Ys U o ,ir r. ...i , .w 4•«t r,.• a . ;161;"7,',. . M w4 x;:i,',`.....ry ♦� +.e(� w � ' �._r •w t eF� W i a:.,„:".;,..„,,,!,,,,I,',,,..w. ti. �i, ^�".a,+ 4w ...",4J ..:W, : . v,,R "- ,t '1 ". yW .. 1 s M.r .a, ;,.E a eA .,, '".,!,An# r„ Lrw,;x 4'�"W V u „ ,A y 4`.,xajyi tl, .4Y..4 ,,,ra� !oi ,C.we ' i'��tac� ry 'q''`,•"'*�'�� ;i] di r k,,e.,,; i4 d 6i r,:17 , , .:::./1 '..,,T 1.),' , The applicant proposes to divide the property into 18 single family .,,...' residential lots, all with a minimum size of 7,500 square foot, Riverwood Lane will be extended from its terminus at Copper Creek to ,, , 92nd Averue, In i,.0..iditiun Lo Riverwood Lane, four lots will have i(''''.'1''':-.1';‘,„"-...'4.;:= frontage oo the 93rd Avenue cul-de-sac in Kneeland Estates No II 7,.. 1 'I..., '1?:;'2'..,,,'.,,; . Although this proposal represents a reduction in the number of lots from 4,',...-. . 0.•':: . 27 to 18, the subdivision layout and street alignment are very similar .., „, ,.4..'.0.,.".7;,1, to the proposal that was approved in 1981. .. .0 .,, 4,, .-, . .4,,, ''A.. . 1kk' ':,;',:l..;,..'',•:::, 5. Agenscy ,ahNEOgaggents ,,i.,..,,,,,'...;":,,,..-!.... ..o.,•,...' : S!''',.;-•;: ",.,4,.. .„.".o, The Engineering Division has the following comments: :::...,,...." ..e', a. Lots 17 and 18 on the east side of 92nd Avenue will preclude the ., ' extension of Riverwood Lane to the east. The applicant should be tIt'...„' ...4,4 ,,, ,- 0, .,'..- able to show that other reasonable alternatives exist for , •:'•'''‘"?`;','....',...,"•, • 4*,Y.,.... :,:-.,•,...:,4'..r.,,'":0".,,'''','0, providing access to the property to the east. .:•,'',,,. ‘'L 3:;:, ,'.3,''' ,' b. The issue of stormwater runoff presents several problems which ''44.0.1%,04,.. t.„ m.!*,...,',t. •,.'4.",,, must be clarified, Stormwater through "Tract A" from the school ...q...I ,,''':,,■147'. ,','.,,, k , . property and 92nd Avenue needs to be addressed along with the ,,.. ,.... . P.c.,,,'',. gully through Lots 10, 11, and 12 and the drainage over Lot 8 ':',.....",'; :',1''..`•si":„.0 the event of a catch basin failure on the 93rd Avenue cul-de-sac, :,.•..,,,,,. 1.,';',...,''''•:.,51.:.' ',',,,:J''''. c, A private pond is located above Lot 12. Liability for any flooding caused by the pond and the right of this owner to release ,'?'",..'",' „.•1_,,,!,,:,, .°;, ,. ;,.:: water onto Lot 12 is unknown , . t44. ''' '' ''''...4,,,',.. ...,,„,,.. ;':',... ,.1... d Slope easements along Riverwood Lane will be necessary .,r,..L'; ,,,,,,,,, e. If Riverwood Lane does not connect with the completed portion ,., ; , oe4:' Copper Creek, a temporary turn around will be necessary. P.. . ., ,'',',',.; I;--.' ,. ,r,,::',,..,t':?:,':;,,1....'',4;-.,• f. Lots 7 and 8 have double frontage and access should be limited to one street. The access for Lot 16 shall be limited to Riverwood o.,.., Lane, .,-,,„,,.. i....t ,...-t g. A traffic report is needed indicating what measures should be ,.., ..,.. ....,,,!,- taken to mitigate the site distance limitations at the proposed ..,,,2, , - ..., ...,,, Riverwood Lane/92nd Avenue intersection. .„ .. ,, .... 4, • 0.. - t.: ri '''„ h. The applicant must provide stormwater runoff report addressing ,- 0- .:', proposed Oh and off site stormwater and erosion control during and .: co ,'. a . i . ftPr construction This report must address the impact of upstream drainage facilities and the mitigation of adverse stormwater impacts upon City Park and greenway areas, , , - ..,i A (9 " , L.0 1.4 i. The 100 year flood plain should be dedicated to the City as . ..1 , greenway, — . *. fr j , A Sensitive Lands Permit will be necessary for any construction or grading within the flood plain, drainageways, or slopes over 25%. ' . I I k Ahy reduction in the width of the City's standard street section will require the approval of a variance ',... ... STAFF REPORT - S 1-86 - PAGE 2 ■:':7,:,* ,'it 4!',.. , ,,„,,,,,„, ,.,,, .,,,,,,,,,?,..,, f, ,,,,ii, ., ' s.s,.'"..,f,,,, . _'',...'':,',J"'',,J..'", ,c1',',',,. %,, ' •'+',07'. ,.'L' ' ,..,,—,:7;: :,-,*4.‘"!':!..;:';''',,:'';',',;1.,i.': -/',,''t° :ki!:,,,: ., •,:.',...,, ',,,,':,:, ,, .."....,,,,' ', - ' 4', ,• , 'Ife'l / Tifh)ets Buatil.,,ledi.sntgeeiprls:nedctit.ohnatDic.ivetseiloorplmn...tr(1.)tt.e:ndth:ct;ettihrieg ss19....t4b)e,asck:nst:rindyarodfs ntlat19e 06.1 diffi CO i. .,.,:. .—..,„ 1 ,,,,'..-, The Tigard School District and NPO #6 have no objection. ,„„e.,,.•,‘J,,,, 4‘.1•': ''.%.1' • No other comments have been received. . .',...:, 8. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS . . . ,'",,,',e--'J''' `,„, . The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan ,.,.. .. 1! .f-,f .',' policies 2.1.1, 3,1.1, 3.2,1, 7.1,2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3 and ,■':,,.:..:'.':,.,'+:+: ''',','•i, : ",..,,.Z; I Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.160, and 18.164. Since the Comprehensive Plan has blen acknowledged, the Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines no longer need to be addressed. ,,o+ A . ''..'1.1",-', The Planning staff concludes that the proposal with minor modifications . is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based . ,,,,,,,,■,*4,.,* upon the findings noted below; „ c 4,,,-. . Policy 2.1.1 is Fatisfied because the Neighborhood Planning 4,f2.' Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice 1!4:-..''i72:-Y' :,:„ the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant' s ',,;.'•;','":',`,1,;,',,, Irr.:q—,'Ir: proposal, '. ..'.!.,;: ',,,',.- '..,... ., i,f.: „....'.:,, ,.. b, Policy 3,1.1 will be satisfied provided that any portions of the Lots which exceed 25% slope are not graded or filled without a -* . ,. : ...,:■ : I'', Sensitive Lands Permit, c, Policy 3,2. 1 will be satisfied because development within the 100 l a , ,,i,, :'.. ,„, . . ."., yer flood plain will be avoided. If any of the proposed street ; ,44,-, ,, i does encroach upon the flood otain, a Sensitive Lands Permit will be requird. — ...t.i.1 ;,i'"--1:,.rp,,, it,'' ',1.v-i,,,,,, ,' 7,,,,' ' ...4. d Policy 7.1.2 can be met When additional information, noted in the .A ' ' .''. Engineering Division comments, is submitted and appropriate ,. 4 '''': mitigation measures taken, *-.,... f,''''''''' ,,,',,, ,':ii',' e. Policy 7,3.1 and 7.4,4 are satisfied because adequate water ., s' sewer facilities are available to the development. The applicant ,„. i th 4,,;O• ti' also indicates that these facilities wll be provided within the 11,- subdivision as required by the City standards. f. Policy 841.1 will be met once the termination of giverwood Lane at I, 7,2nd Avenue is justified or provisions for future extension to the . a east are made. ',..,,..:. g. Policy 8, 1.3 will be satisfied when the conditions of approval ',..!. relating to street improvements are completed. &. .,. The Planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with .,.. .„, .ii. the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the 1, findings ncted below; , , 4 r , ” A''' ,7' .:':,'I".1.4 /4■ ..4 '4'4.•"•,1, ' ''1 ; ','' • STAFF REPOkr — S 1-06 — PAGE 3 ..., '' ''k'' -,' ,'.k Itot.,"•.4,'.'",' t 4 .'I ',i,.,„„ ,1 ,'•,t..,...,1 , ',1.,,,,,:j''',',■„,,.,,..', 't,''—A 0.:..4:,:,1,' .:?,,'',...:I.41,:,,:!,',1+,.1:'4.'';,,,'''','' ..0-.'.,,,,,7: ,,,7•,4, ','',,'',` .:,,' ',.,, ,,,,.:„,,',,,,,:',,,4..i"'*1%'k'”‘;..',"1,4 ,.,,,,L,:,' ," 4," f e, . , ,,, .i" .,,,",:,; .,,,,!,i., ,,,,,„'',.. , ,1, ,'1 '''.'",i1,.,,,,"'„`c','.:1',,,,*,,,i'A'',..:.'.....':,,,'",:r"'•'..'''.:+.",1'f“t''''' ',,a:' ": ‘.,,;`..'''' 4' 1":..■,4 4 4 .4. ',', ' : :. ' .v.,,, ■,-...: :'1":;'''',:.:, ..... -.%...., , . ..k .-,...4 ,.. . . ' , • , ''." ',,;' e,• :,,...1... `,, ' ' ,, ..'•., 1-',.;.. ..,. '.,::,',"' )'''''.;., ,.1'1,7,,,,,4.-:,,,;- . . . oz, Chapter 18,50 of the Code is satisfied bec&use the proposal meets .41'..',. ..,ir,.:..r.. all of the requirements of the R-4.5 zone. ' :...,....;;.,,, • ,,..:',hlit''',' ,,,i',,,,....,.i.r.,...,...,. b Chapter 18 . 160 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets the requirements set forth for the submission and approval of a ...., preliminary plat, P.,,,:;;.s"s' • ,', ,'.,,,,':: 4 ii.'7',...`,.t.'";..,„%. c, Chapter 18.164 of the Code will be satisfied during the approval .,..'",...-2,4.":,;-:.:-:. process for the final plat. ,,..'", ..,... ,....,-,'' 4..".'.''"7:,':. 41';‘■;.,,,'", t'"C%■''')tt'''t;', C, RECOMMENDATION • ,,!','....';'..,..,;:." ND ...., .,!'s ''.;. ,I .,„.....:. .'.:4',':':',...:. "' '''' Based upon the findings, and conclusions above, the Planning staff ..,..':. recommends approval of S 1-86 subject to the following conditions: , :*:.;,', ;•-•',.*'' 1 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL OE MET PRIOR TO ,..,...,.. .,...' ;,:....,1,.'...:',.:;4 ,.., 4,.''''":''... ',.. RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT. ..u..,'"..„.:,,..,..- ..,,.: 2 Standard half-street and full street improvements including sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage '''.--....„,„............,........s . . , , , . .r. . and utilities (delete inapplicable items) shall be installed along ..1'ki the SW 92nd AvenueVOPi-orrtage. Said improvements along W 92nd ,,,,,,,,.,,..:,..-.•,' , ,..%, Avenue shall be built to (60' R/W, 36' Pvmt, ) City tandards „.... ,..4,......,..,.. :1:''7.•;',;', 14'‘;'4 '' including an S ft walk on the west side and conform to the alignment of existing improvements, (3( note the attached section ,',,4:,•,,,,, ,-, which was approved via Kneeland Estates subdivision development) , ,,,...,,,,,,-,„, '.:,.. ,. .? .,., ,... .4.,,';'„fc, 3 Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction ...,..,, '.°. .., plans including a site grading plan and cross sections and one (1) „,t., ,,, ,,,I...... t„, .„...,-,, ,-.,....,.,./.4 i .%,. . ?*'','..-c.4 itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered ''''..- Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public '4 ri'l'''' • j":'', ,'.,',''.i. improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for ,:.., -4';' -.4,....i. approval, ?%:,... ,..,,.,,. .. .. i- 4 . Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profile details shall be provided as „, • • part of the public improvemeint plans , ....- -rt.. ..,..,... r :,-,,,,:, 5 Slope easements alorg SW Riverwood Lane shall be provided to the ‘-'4',:'..-'*".•°.',, '".., . ,. .,. ... public. Documentation shall be on City forms or on the plat and ,;*.' ;, : approved by the Engileering Section, ..A.44A .,.,..,:. S. ., ti rhe applicant shall provide a stormwater runoff report addressing ?*,,z rg proposed onsite and offsite stormwater control and soil erosion .,..t...,.,. ,'. CO . control (during and after construction); said report shall also „.__ ,- Lt ..° ,. address the impact of upstream drainage facilities on the site and '. gt- i.,,' --11 '..;. the mitigation of stormwater damage to the downslope City park & , ma , open space lands . ,e, — , '..,....,„...."-, . r.,.. 51( ," ,,,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,i-,:,.. - - ., ,..1 . /. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Enineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans, The tions will require posting of a 100% Performance bond, the payment of a permit fne and a sign installation/streetlight fee, Also, the execution of a construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to or concurrently with the issuahce of approved publir improvement plans, SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION r M. REGARDING FEE SCHDULEcl 80NDIOG AND AGREEMENTS .,...:'4. ‘,..t.--------.)!-- STAFF REPORT - S 1-86 - PAGE 4 '1,'......,",-,...,_':,‘.t.,',1',... ..,,..:;,,,,'",',*4„,!,' , "A,Y N,'.4'' ..4 ,.„,...,:...,• --' A . . I) .. :*. • ' , •,, 1 . ...' . .e..-: , 0 8 A one (1' ) foot reserve strip granted to the "City of Tigard" shall be provided at the terminus of SW Riverwood Lane 4efe-i4-4e.e.s/061,r, 'IAV. connect eeieHT-1-1 ,---iolertImrm-TITETTbn of River ood Lene. .4 . ,. • . 004,/arilp4dAx. . •„ e- .... 9. If %Applicable, a temporary turn-a-round sh be installed At the ,.. ' A% ‘.., terminus of SW Riverwood Land; s * rn-a-round to be approved by . the post office, fire 00f VEnent and Engineering Section. The turn-a--round shad le l 'T;moved, if deemed necessary by the City ., . ,. ., . .Engineer, at applicants expense. A bond shall be posted with ,,.. ■1,-:: '.- ' , the City assure future compliance. ... v.....,.. e- ■,- .: .:.. 10. Additiona3, right-ofe,way shall be dedicated to the Public along the -'i/ee SW 92nd Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet ,. ... ,_ V . from centPrline. The description for said dedication shall be 1 'y. . tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by Washington County. Tha dedication document shall be on City forms e 4,e • ...e.\t' - e :' ' \ . and approved by the Engineering Section, DEDICATION FORMS AND , * INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED. 1 . ‘e' 111 Double frontage lots, namely # 7 and 8, shall be restricd to ,;' --.: .., .4' ' e,' • IA/0 i'■••••,-,' accvess t oril or - -- ; • •;n-• • L.....-r-e•ti,e----eee-e---e-e--eee- - ee .,.e, .. .-- a41-Le ' o itiet.' t, ''' • - ,- • •• •.. . - • 12. Lot #16 shall only have diect access onto SW Riverwood Lane. • . . ..„, ... . f , 13. The applicant shall provide a traffic report indicating measurel; - - -',, . to be applied to mitigate sight distance concerns, at the ')%.`.''.. .'....; • . ,';d .,,,, , .....4 . intersection of RiverwoodeLane and 92nd Av- oue, t. the c/f-af' E44n1n,ej... •9 r;ei ng Section, kfra0 )d il .1 : 6t 11 ' . ..,„, . 1, ‘...-.., .... . . 14. The applicant shall d e d i c at e lands witiiiri th e j.00 y ar tloo pia)... //mei .21 .1 , , ' oi”7 1,1:1;' ,...• ..r. • ,-... for greenway purposes. , %4, 4 illrendo dio-aAt ,o, 42,n A ........., 15. Street Centerline Monumentation iii-'-,-' e• - ,e.: a, In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2), the ,.....e.4r.. e centerlines of all street and roadway rights-of-way shall be ,e. ', •-.,''' ',..,e. monumented before the City shall accept a street improvement. :. , \ . --...,-. '" • b. All centerline monuments shall be placed in a monument box conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument bones shall be set at design finish grade of said street or , , ix ,•,,, roadway, P' (0 • c. The following centerline monuments shall be set: 1) All centerline-centerline intersections . .. (.9 %. Intersections created with "collector" or other existing streets, shall be set when the centerline . ...I . .. alignment of said "collector" or other street has been , established by or for the City: •T. ' . ■ I,) 6 .,■ 2) Center of all cUl-de-sacs; ' " • '',- C., 1 a ' STAFF REPORT - S 1-86 - PAGE 5 • i ' , ..j. ,-. . „ ',..-..,. , ''''', ' "-'. . .-I . it, ' `:...... - e. .,';':.'=:'• , : - ' " ti.".i'.. ...'IA • .. *";::' ' " -' ' ':6.* :4:244 , • i 1 .. 0 0 3) Curve points, points of intersection (I Z. ) when their . ? ry position falls in:lide the limits of the pavement s r � Lti ' .+ otherwise beginning and ending points (R C. and E.C. ) , 4) All sanitary and storm location shall be place41. in -. " positions that do not interfere with centerline • r - •; ,, monumentat ion :`� ..', 16. A Sensitive Lands Permit shall be required for any encroachment into the 100 year floodplain or c4nstr duct ion in drainageways or slopes over 25%. '" :.: 17. Lot 12 shall be subject to the setback and height requirements for ,::- flag lots contained in Sections 18,96.090 and 18.98 of the Code. 18. A tree cutting permit shall be obtained from the City prior to } .;+;, removing any trees over 6 inches in diameter. •• .; 19. After review- and approval by the Planning Director and City ',• Engineer, the Final Plat Shall be recorded with Washington County ; YES 20. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision dale noted below. n - yik...'"' idyl . '• ' PREPARED RED DY iteith Lid APPR0V gY lilliati A. P1onaAhan � , Senior P1 ner Director of Planning & . t "� Development " (kSL bs87) a 'r h} BSI m y ii 8 4 A + -Y 4.1..• S' ... - F 4,-. ,V4 s• , ,,,,,• e '• w _ t x4 ;• +` � • • mot 1 • �=wYf f•m .c� ' • u r , w % '. 4 ,, .w 4 .iy + Yr ..., + 4++• 2 , ww W d•,,,,`,.',.°.,4. , [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]