Loading...
Correspondence March 19, 1998 , 1A Carter Case, Architect - I CITY OF TIG 513 NW 13th #204 OREGON Portland, OR 97209 RE: Mooki Dental Lab Building Plan Review 11755 SW Queen Elizabeth PC #: 3 -03c BUP#: 98 -0109 Your changes have been reviewed for compliance. The following issues are outstanding: I SITE. WORK _ as 1. The liquefaction and soil strength report will be waived upon receipt of a written 31 " • pih 14 opinion of a qualified geotechnical engineer, pursuant to OSSC, Section 1804.2 ti3 (Exception 2). A _4. "� Provide fire flow work sheets and fire flow tests. 4M est 1 i ENERGY. COMPLIANCE° =. _ .. A _�� The required forms were not with your revisions. Please submit Forms 5A ,SL- through 5C, Oregon NREC. (ACCESSIBILITY.' . . , - :.:. - ., . _:I Your revisions did not show how the showers will comply with OSSC, Sections OK— 1109.2.3 and 1109.10.10. I.FIRE. ANDLIFE- SAFETY - . - ' .. r :_ .I Pacific Pointe Court is not a public way as defined in OSSC, Section 1001.2. In order to use this access, we will require a copy of a recorded easement, that o - V C ' Mooki Dental Labs has the authority to utilize this private street. The agreement °_14:4„),;(5 shall bind in perpetuity heirs, successors and assigns, showing that Mooki ,� Laboratories, their heirs, successors and assigns shall have access to this J private road. Secondly, if this document is in existence, the center line is , 12 feet 0 inches from the building. The wall therefore will require one -hour construction. Openings will not require protection. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 Mooki Dental Lab Building Plan Review PC #: 3 -03c BUP #: 98 -0109 Page #2 1. Drawing S1 does not compare with BLH, Inc. structural analysis. There are j details missing, calculations for a non - existent second floor, drag stsucts are not shown, etc. mart Please reexamine Drawing S1, and have the engineer stamp same. In order to issue, I will require three complete revised sets of drawings. Sincerely, sia4s, Rob inCBO SENIOR PLANS EXAMINER • • Ii I Fax:5032232630 May 27 '98 10:02 P.02 Geotechnical Resources Incorporated Consulting Engineers, Geologists, and Environmental Scientists May 27, 1998 4-125 Carter Case, Ambit= 513 NW 13th Avenue, Suite 204 Portland, OR 97209 Attermion: Carter Case SUBJECT: 117 SW QII�£AB� D��1�NG CITY, OREGON At your request, Geo echnieal Resources, Inc. (Gill) has reviewed the potential for seismically induced liquefaction of the soils beneath the above- refuenced site. The purpose ofthis review is to meet the intent of the Qty ',Meath Building Department's Building plan mew process. Based on a review of the available geologic informed= we anticipate the site is mantled with soil of the Willamette Silt FoImalion, which is underlain at retaalvelY shallow depth by Columbia Rivet Basalt. We anticipate the groundwater level at this site will be found at depths that range from 10 to 15 R We also anticipate the grotmdwate r will approach the ground surface dining periods of extended precipitation The Oregon Depamnent of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGA 1) produced a' 'Relative Earthquake Hazard Map of the Portland Metro Region, Clac Multnomah, and Washington Cotm1iK 1997." A review of this map iodates that the risk of fiqueafact ion is con iduod high, with a total of 20 ft (6 m) most susoeptrble to liququte tctioa Assuming a conservative value of liquthetion- induced volumetric strait of 3 %, the . resultbg liquefaction-induced total settlement would be on the order of 0.6 ft. In as opinion, differential seeded could approach half the total aetderneet. We anticipate that the majority of the sealeerneats will occur after the ad of strong shaking, allowing ample time for compares to ettit the structure. We recommend that you review the findings with your structural engineer. This review is based entirely on work performed by others on nearby sites. It was the intent of this review to provide a sense of magnitude of the probable liquefaction - induced se edemtent. Sign& cant moons are inherent in a study of this type and additional investipbors mu be conducted if a better . understanding of the associated risk is den;aed- Sy. GEOTEF LAICAL RESOURC I S, INC. Puf ' • ` c, ., qr :e.Afr ..z or/ at l� I! �'�• 20.Y0 David D. Driscoll, P.S. ��p� Prin ipal 9725 SW saaverton- Hinsdale Hwy Suite 140 Reaverton, °mon 97005.3364 t'hon, (3U3) 641 -347 FAX (s03) 644 -SO34 e - rs+ail grieittotlepurt.cum J l _ • • Carter Case Architects & Planners - Response to Plan Examination Sheet #2: 513 NW 13th RECEIVED Suite 204 PortaInd, Or 97205 223 3855 APR 0 3 1998 223 2630 fax Date: Mar. 30, 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Bob Poskin City of Tigard Re: Mooki Dental Lab /King City BUP # 98 -0109 In response to your checklist: Site Work: It 1: Letter from GRI to follow. y wi: Fire flow tests to be done in the near future. Energy Compliance: Item 1: Please find enclosed energy forms. Accessibility: Item 1: See revised floor plan sheet #1. Fire & Life Safety: Item 1: Please find enclosed easement information. (FYI, the enclosed survey shows 16' -0" to centerline.) See sheet #1 for one hour wall info. Structural: Item 1: See enclosed structural calcs., there is not any reference to a second floor. The detail shown page 7 of the calcs shows up on detail 11/6. The information from page 8 & 9 of the calcs does not apply due to the detail used, see 1 /S1 (shear is transfered to the foundation via 16d nailing @ 5" o/c into the sill). Drag struts indicated on page 13 of the calcs. are shown on sheet S1 /shear wall layout. • _ . - S+ Carter Case Architects & Planners Response to Plan Examination Sheet: 513 NW 13th Suite 204 PortaInd, Or 9720S 223 385 223 2630 fax Date: Mar. 16, 1998 RECEIVED MAR 1 7 1998 To: Bob Poskin COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Tigard Re: Mooki Dental Lab /King City BUP # 98 -0109 In response to your checklist: • Energy Compliance: ' ' Item 1: Please find enclosed energy forms. — n1 sr u� - �,a..n m � Am_ ibili . d r : See revised floor plan sheet #1. The owner has opted not to have employee lockers. See revised floor plan e n heet #1. Ite See revised floor plan sheet #1. tem 4: See revised floor plan sheet #1. r ___4Fir Life Safety: em "Burn out " fers a process of using a gas flame to clean up the plaster castings used in the lab. The work is done under an exhaust hood and over a casting sink. Item. See revised floor plan sheet #1. Item See reflected ceiling /lighting plan sheet #4. Item, See revised floor plan sheet #1. Item,S< The compressor is less than five cubic feet in volume. Ite See revised floor plan sheet #1. The quantities of hazardous materials do not exceed those listed in OSSC. Item - 7r See revised floor plan sheet #1. Ite 11 :. See revised floor plan sheet #1 and cross section A/2. • ' _ This wall abuts a public right of way, thus is not required to be protected. Structural: Item ,1h• . See revised floor plan sheet #1. Item 2l See revised cross sections sheet #2. Ite ii See revised cross sections sheet #2 and roof plan sheet #4. Item 4: Roof trusses to be bidder designed /drawings to be submitted prior to installation. Ite 16 See revised structural calculations. to s j. See revised structural calculations. Iten See revised structural calculations. Iteny8( See note on revised floor plan sheet #1. Item: See enclosed product information. Mechanical, plumbing, and elecrical work is to be bidder - designed and will by separate permits. Sincerely • \1 arter ase' A • 4 March 10, 1998 Carter Case CITY OF TIGARD 513 NW 13th #204 OREGON Portland, OR 97209 RE: Mooki Dental Lab Building Plan Review 11755 SW Queen Elizabeth PC #: 3 -03c BUP#: 98 -0109 Submittal documents for the above referenced project have been reviewed for conformance with the applicable 1996 Oregon Specialty Codes and other applicable codes and standards. The following comments are noted: I ENERGYCOMPLIANCE_ : r:: . ..._ • 7. , r . = ;,:_,.. - ' 1 � ►''�9 Submit Completed Energy Compliance Forms 5a through 5c, Oregon N Non- Residential Energy Code. Oe (b tQg P. (ACCESSIBILITY -- _"._'•';i.''' .._ . _,.;.: - " "'t . -._ ".. . - :1 foe( -pp), • 5 The shower stall shall comply with OSSC, Section 1109.10.10. Provide details. oe Rob 4-14.1go ,,,,,, At least one (1) locker shall be accessible. OSSC, Section 1108.4.6. Or 67 Access to the shower does not comply with OSSC, Section 1109.2.3. Provide focv details on how you will comply. Door (B) in the corridor requires 18 inches of clearance on the latch side. Zo it OSSC, Table 11E and ADAAG 25. FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY ; - _ - . " - _ 1. Provide a definition of a "Bum -out Room." Details shall include pyrotenics, gases, etc. t „,,..2,, a4 , , oc cccc44,ati ,d.,c, r2 -- a..4. 4 i...04- •^" I ' " Provide Type 2 -A fire extinguishers throughout so that the travel distance to an __� o 6 inguisher does not exceed 75 feet [UFC Std. 10 -1 3.2.1]. . When two or more exits are required, internally lighted exits signs shall be provided - SC, Section 1013]. Clearly indicate sign locations on the electrical floor p and provide that E sheet in the revised plans. . Provide secondary power to one lamp in each fixture [OSSC, Section 1013.4]. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 Mooki Dental Lab Building Plan Review PC #: 3 -03c BUP#: 98 -0109 Page #2 B. Exit signs shall incorporate an internally illuminated international symbol of access [OSSC, Section 1108.4.12.1]. Provide specifications in accordance with OSSC, Section 1109.15.6 within the revised plans. iv . The egress door labeled (C) swinging towards the fireplace does not comply with OSSC, Section 1004.10. The occupant load factor is 57, therefore, one -half is 8 inches. 71 . If a compressor exceeds 5 cubic feet in volume, and has a gauge pressure of 150 or more, a permit will be required from the State of Oregon Building Codes Division, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Division. Provide a copy of your permit application to the City of Tigard, Attn: Plans Examiner. For information on application requirements, phone the Boiler and Pressure Vessels Division, (503)373 -7499. The laboratories shall be separated from each other and from other portions of the building by not less than a one -hour fire- resistive occupancy separation. Where the quantities of hazardous materials in this use do not exceed those listed in OSSC, Table 3 -D or 3 -E, the requirements of Sections 307.5.2 and 307.8 shall apply. When the quantities of hazardous materials in this use exceed those listed in OSSC, Table 3 -D or 3 -E, this use shall be classified as the appropriate Group H occupancy. Provide copies of MSDS sheets, quantities used and quantities stored. The wall labeled N2 requires one -hour fire resistive construction, OSSC, Table 7.1.000.., 5A. Glazing shall be protected, having a fire resistive rating of 3/4 hour, and shall not exceed the area stated on OSSC, Section 713.8. 1 [A9 01. • Provide a parapet on wall A/2. OSSC, Section 709.4. . 41 0 Glazing labeled 4 "Future Lab'', shall be protected, having a fire resistive rating of 3/4 hour, and shall not exceed the area stated in OSSC, Section 713.8. STRUCTURAL` Provide a key box (Knox) mounted to the exterior wall 10' above finish grade and adjacent to the right side of the main entry door. The box shall contain keys to gain access as required by the Fire Marshal [UFC 902.4]. If you have any questions regarding this requirement, please contact the Fire Marshal at 526- 2502. V b Provide a seismic detail for the T -bar ceiling. OSSC, Section 2314, Volume 2. (14V Provide draft stops in accordance with OSSC, Section 708.3.1.2.2. d pit Provide engineering on trusses. • Mooki Dental Lab Building Plan Review PC #: 3-03c BUP#: 98 -0109 Page #3 5. Structural calculations submitted are not based on seismic and wind loads for this area; use seismic zone 3, wind load exposure "B" at 80 miles per hour. 6. Loads shall be calculated as follows: A. Floors at 50 psf, B. Snow 25 live, minimum 10 dead, C. Storage 125 psf. Resubmittal of these calculations shall bear an original seal of your engineer to include the expiration of his /her license. 7. Multilevel roofs, lower roofs and decks of adjacent structures and roofs adjacent to projections shall be designed for snowdrift loads in accordance with OSSC, Appendix 16, Section 1641, and eave overhanging roof structures shall be designed in accordance with OSSC, Appendix 16, Section 1640. A. Provide the engineer's calculations for drifting snow. When exit doors are used in pairs, manually- operated edge- or surface- mounted &A- flush bolts are prohibited [OSSC, Section 1004.3]. A A - Provide ICBO Evaluation Report on "synthetic plaster system." . I MECHANICAL, PLUMBING?; i,ggI ICAL - -.. . ' `I 1. Mechanical, plumbing and electrical permits will require separate applications and approval. Please submit three copies of revised submittal documents and a letter indicating your response to the above comments for review. Please call me at (503) 639 -4171 if you have any questions. Sincerely, - Robert Poskin, CBO SENIOR PLANS EXAMINER Fax :5032232630 -Feb 3 '99 18:00 P.01 pgkek Carter Case MEMO: 1 , - ► a & Manners aJ 513 NW 13th Suite 204 r J ' Portalnd, Or 97205 Ne ,, � 223 3855 . � � tS �� 1 . I 2232630E • Date: Feb.3, 1999 . > / 1D o• �� � P • 4 0 106 4. to: Bob Poskin/Ron Church ua,� • p • Building Dept. City of Tigard Re: Mooki Dental Lab /King City BUP # 9 8-0109 I have heard from the contractor that the inspector has commented on the accessible shower at the above - mentioned building. Although the drawings called out an accessible shower, the contractor installed a regular shower. SMce the building is a private entity and is both less than 4,000 sq ft, all on one story and is less tk an 20 feet high inside, the building is exempt under ORS 447.210(1), SECTION 1102 of 1998 CSSC. • The shower is for the private use of the employees only and is adaptable per ADAAG figure 35 (a)if neccessary in the future. • Stcerely, balk C *rter Case AIA • v. Fax :5032232630 Oct 6 '98 15:33 P. 01 Carter Case Architects & Hamm MEMO: 513 NW 13th . Suite 204 Portalnd, Or 97205 223 385`. 223 2630 bx Date: Oct 6, 1998 To: Building Dept. , City of Tigard �� V do . 7 Re: Mooki Dental Lab/King City BUP # 98 -0109 g � // :7 �� 9 44.214-1 oe4.40-ee- Lesponse to inspection report dated 1015/98: Items #1 & #2; I have instructed the contractor to repair those items as per your notes. Item #3: Simpson HID 5A hold downs are actually quite a bit stronger than the HPHD22 specified, and are therefore acceptable. I have instructed the contractor to locate hold downs where shown on the drawings. • 5 OD 1 •1, , r r lilliAlliiik.: , ail OF 040 . Sincerely, `-N �;O"'' • C arter Case AIA Fax:5032232630 Oct 6 '98 15 :34 P.02 " • tri t r ter I ttsAIRU bUILUIN(I IN,rbt; I ION DIVISION MST 24 -Hour Inspection Line: 639 -4175 Business Line: 639 -4171 2 P � 09001 Date Requested l� - • 8 A M X PM 8 Locat n J 5 I1 Y l , Bch"' l Suite MEC r3 --'?'-'6 --'?'-'6 G 16 L Convict Person 9c Ph PLM Contrictor Ph SWR B.UI NG Tenant/Owner )1 CO k.._1 DE JT� t _Ac. ELC Reta i ng Wall ELR Four'. ation ;� :,,,: - . ;. . . .. - , , , .t i FP ,v ,.. -c.,,--.+- •1..; `•,... , '" . .J-r - •.-01-•: fir - r , j..` �' . :�, �.`�, F . 'ain . \� `! ' ' � • ' �• Craw Drain Inspection Notes: SGN Slab /16 << ph Pt ( it(. c .. SIT • Post eam �, FO/e~• SID1t� (� ft-- STU C ( O xt S teath/Shear a In a ear Fram 1g sul D li N D II Nailing Firew ll Fire *rinkler • Fire Piarrn ( /� ..44-7-1 /� / — Susp'id Ceiling ��'�.t.r./L �t-et�.( , ,cam-" Roof ! --��►--• i � Misc: �AL �--- �. %�.0 t j._ ;t Final ', PA PART FAIL PL ; , NO . 41.E -el , L... -1.„6,. 4- Post Beam `r`4 � . Unde Slab ,A n ,, 9 .�.•..... 4 Ctt- Top • Wate Service r�..r✓--• 0.- C.,47 ---C. diLl.c Ail . ' ry Sewer 6 Rain ;.rains 4 n c f 4 c,--� A./Pk/7 2. Z. Final PA - • = PART FAIL a 1 liV �t - rrf/•do o //4 ' MEC ` NICAL V 0 Post .' Beam • Roug In Ar� _.L-1,-. r .,a p� Gas ne - L�' Smok Dampers �,.m v if Final ^ PAS = PART FAIL e 3.4,..;, c 4-C.-e 1 Servi • _ _ Roug In UG /S' :b _ Low •Rage Fire •;arm Final PA PART FAIL ern ' . . Be • I/Grading Sanit = 1 Sewer Ste Drain [ ] Reinspection fee of $ required before next inspection. Pay at City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd Cat- Basin Fire " pply Line ease call for reinspection RE: [ I Unable to inspect - no access ADA p App • r ch/Sidewalk Date /<---) - f 9 37 Inspector .c1 Ext Final PA PART FAIL DO NOT REMOVE this Inspection record from the job site.