City Council Packet - 04/24/2012 n
TIGARD
City of Tigard
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
BUSINESS MEETING
April 24, 2012
COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED
I: \Design & Communications \Donna \City Councillccpkt3
Cathy Wheatley
13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171
TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard- or.gov
City of Tigard
Tigard Business Meeting - Agenda
TIGARD
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD
MEETING DATE AND TIME: April 24, 2012 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223
6:30 PM
• STUDY SESSION
A. Update on Park System Development Charges (SDCs) and Discussion of Park SDC Implementation
B. Administrative Items
• Council Calendar
• April 30, 2012 - Budget Committee Meeting - Public Works Auditorium, 6:30 p.m.
• May 1, 2012 - CCDA Meeting - Red Rock Creek Conference Room, 6:30 p.m.
• May 7, 2012 - Budget Committee Meeting - Public Works Auditorium, 6:30 p.m.
• May 8, 2012 - City Council - Town Hall; Study Session at 6:30 p.m., Business Meeting at
7:30 p.m.
• May 14, 2012 - Budget Committee Meeting - Public Works Auditorium, 6:30 p.m. (if
needed)
• May 15 2012 - City Council - Town Hall - Workshop Meeting - 6:30 p.m.
• May 22, 2012 - Joint Meeting with Lake Oswego at Lake Oswego, 380 A Avenue; 5:30
p.m. dinner, 6:30 p.m. Joint Meeting
• May 24, 2012 - Clean Water Services Tour of Durham Plant - (evening - time to be
announced)
• EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property
transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660(2)(e). All discussions are confidential and those present may
disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive
Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive
Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive
Sessions are closed to the public.
7:30 PM
1. BUSINESS MEETING - APRIL 24, 2012
A. Call to Order
B. Roll Call
C. Pledge of Allegiance
D. Council Communications & Liaison Reports
E. Call to Council and Staff for Non - Agenda Items
2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less, Please)
7:35 p.m. - time is estimated
A. Follow -up to Previous Citizen Communication
B. Tigard High School Student Envoy
C. Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce
D. Citizen Communication — Sign Up Sheet
3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council and Local Contract Review Board) - These items are
considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may
request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to:
7:45 p.m. - time is estimated
A. Approve City Council Meeting Minutes for:
• February 28, 2012
• March 20, 2012 (Draft to be ready by April 20 and included in the packet.)
• March 27, 2012 (Draft to be ready by April 20 and included in the packet.)
B. Approve 2012 Application to the Department of Justice for an Edward Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant
C. Local Contract Review Board:
1. Award Pavement Management Program - Slurry Seal Project Contract to Blackline, Inc.
• Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the
Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council /City Center
Development Agency has voted on those items which do not need discussion.
4. ARBOR DAY: RECEIVE TREE CITY USA GROWTH AWARD AND PRESENT TREE
STEWARDSHIP AWARDS
7:50 p.m. - time is estimated
5. APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF THE EISWERTH PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY
MANAGER TO COMPLETE THE PROPERTY PURCHASE
8:15 p.m. - time is estimated
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -15 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF THE
EISWERTH PROPERTY, (TAX LOT 2S104DCO5901), AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO TAKE ALL NECESSARY ACTION TO COMPLETE THE PROPERTY
PURCHASE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
6. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
8:25 p.m. - time is estimated
7. NON AGENDA ITEMS
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive
Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable
statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.
Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS
192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for
the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to
the public.
9. ADJOURNMENT
8:35 p.m.
AIS -881
A.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 04/24/2012
Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes
Agenda Title: Update on Park System Development Charges (SDCs) and Discussion of Park SDC
Implementation
Prepared For: Steve Martin Submitted By: Steve Martin, Public Works
Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Mtg - Study
Sess.
Information
ISSUE
The council is asked to listen to the update and provide direction on the implementation of park SDCs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends the council listens to the update and provides direction on implementation.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Background
SDCs are fees levied on new development to recover some of the cost to serve that development. The city is
authorized to assess and collect SDCs by state statute.
SDC methodology allows the city to use SDC dollars to fund council- approved park and trail projects. Tigard's park
SDCs were last updated seven years ago, and those SDCs were based on park projects from the 1999 Park System
Master Plan. Since that time, the council adopted an updated Park System Master Plan in 2009 and accepted the
Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan in 2011. The plans identify and prioritize numerous city park and trail
projects. Updated SDCs take in account the acquisitions and improvements outlined in these master plans.
The city hired FCS Group, a consulting firm with expertise in developing municipal SDCs, to update its park SDCs.
At its January 17, 2012, workshop meeting, the council received a draft SDC study, dated October 2011, and John
Guillarducci of FCS Group briefed the council on park SDCs.
The Current System Development Charge Study and Implementation
As required by state statute, SDC methodology was available for public review. Additionally, staff met with Ernie
Platt and Justin Wood from the Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland (HBA) and discussed the
proposed updates.
The only comments received were from Mr. Wood of the HBA; his comments are attached. In summary Mr. Wood:
1. Questioned the $350,000 cost per acre for park land acquisition used in the methodology.
2. Urged the council to delay or phase -in increases in park SDCs.
To address the first comment, the city's consultant updated the per acre cost for park land using the land and
construction cost indexes outlined in the SDC methodology, and used each year to update the park SDCs for the
Tigard Master Fees and Charges. Based upon these indexes, the cost of park land decreased from $350,000 to
$240,555 per acre. An updated Park & Recreation System Development Charge Study, dated March 23, 2012, is
attached. The SDC methodology has not changed, but the actual SDCs originally presented to council in January
have been adjusted to reflect the decrease in land values. A table showing this adjustment is attached.
With regard to the second comment, after adopting the SDC methodology, the council needs to decide how to
implement the updated SDCs. It may choose to implement the SDCs all at once, or may phase -in the SDCs over
a specific time period.
The council is scheduled to consider the park SDC methodology on June 12, 2012. The new SDCs could be
incorporated into the city's Master Fees and Charges Schedule, also scheduled for council consideration on June 12.
The SDCs would become effective July 1, 2012.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
Council could choose not to receive an update on the Park SDC status.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
2012 Council Goal 1.c - "Deliver on the promise of the voter - approved park bond by identifying all acquisition
opportunities and completing the majority of park land acquisitions and improvements by the end of 2012."
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
The council was briefed on park SDCs at its January 17, 2012, workshop meeting.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Information:
The Park System Master Plan and Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan identify approximately $75 million
in acquisition and development projects over the next 20 years. Under the updated SDC methodology, $56
million of those project costs could be funded by SDC dollars collected from new development.
With the approval of the SDC methodology and implementation of the updated SDCs, charges will increase
between 8 percent and 43 percent depending on the SDC category (single - family, multi - family, etc.). Table V.2,
on page 18 of the Park & Recreation System Development Charge Study, outlines updated park SDCs that could
take effect on July 1, 2012, for fiscal year 2012 -2013. These charges reflect the increased costs associated with
park acquisition and development projects as identified in the Park System Master Plan and the Tigard Greenways
Trail System Master Plan.
Attachments
park SDC Comparison
Draft Park & Recreation SDC Study
Park System Development Charge Comparison
System Development Charge
Type of SDC Current Proposed in Study Dated Proposed in Study Dated
October, 2011 * March 23, 2012 **
At $350,000 Per Acre At $240,555 Per Acre
Land Acquisition Land Acquisition
Residential, Single - Family $4,048.34 $6,624.27 $5,695.57
Residential, Multi - Family $3,254.20 $5,294.49 $4,552.23
Residential, Manufactured $3,209.17 $4,013.96 $3,451.22
Non - Residential, Per Employee $274.81 $444.16 $393.87
* SDCs presented at the council's January 17, 2012, workshop meeting.
** SDCs now proposed for 2012 -13.
Tigard, Oregon
TIGARD
Report for
PARKS & RECREATION
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
CHARGE STUDY
March 23, 2012
FCS GROUP
4380 SW Macadam Ave. Suite 220
Portland, OR 97239
T: 503.841.6543 I F: 503.841.6573
This entire report is made of readily recyclable materials,
including the bronze wire binding and the front and
back cover, which are made from post- consumer
recycled plastic bottles.
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I: BACKGROUND 1
A. Policy 1
B. Project 1
SECTION II: METHODOLOGY 3
A. Reimbursement Fee 3
B. Improvement Fee 3
C. Compliance Costs 3
D. Summary 4
SECTION III: GROWTH CALCULATION 5
A. Relevant Types of Growth 5
B. Population Growth 5
B.1 Expected Growth 5
B.2 Conversion to Dwelling Units 5
C. Employment Growth 6
C.1 Expected Growth 6
C.2 Conversion to Population Equivalents 6
SECTION IV: COST CALCULATION 9
A. Facility Needs 9
B. Facility Costs 10
B.1 Neighborhood /Pocket Parks 10
B.2 Community Parks 11
B.3 Linear Parks 12
B.4 Open Space 13
B.5 Trails 13
B.6 Allocation to Residents and Non - Residents 14
C. Compliance Costs 14
D. Adjustments 15
E. Summary 15
SECTION V: SDC CALCULATION 17
A. Residential Cost per Capita 17
B. Residential SDC per Dwelling Unit 17
C. Non - Residential SDC per Employee 17
D. Summary and Comparison 17
E. Annual Adjustment 18
•:;> FCS G RO U P
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page ii
• :;> FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 1
SECTION I: BACKGROUND
This section describes the policy context and project scope upon which the body of this report i s
based.
A. POLICY
Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 223.297 to 223.314 authorize local governments to establish system
development charges (SDCs). These are one -time fees on new development, and they are paid at the
time of development. SDCs are intended to recover a fair share of the cost of existing and planned
facilities that provide capacity to serve future growth.
ORS 223.299 defines two types of SDC:
• A reimbursement fee that is designed to recover "costs associated with capital improvements
already constructed, or under construction when the fee is established, for which the local
government determines that capacity exists"
• An improvement fee that is designed to recover "costs associated with capital improvements
to be constructed"
ORS 223.304(1) states, in part, that a reimbursement fee must be based on "the value of unused
capacity available to future system users or the cost of existing facilities" and must account for prior
contributions by existing users and any gifted or grant- funded facilities. The calculation must
"promote the objective of future system users contributing no more than an equitable share to the
cost of existing facilities." A reimbursement fee may be spent on any capital improvement related to
the system for which it is being charged (whether cash - financed or debt - financed).
ORS 223.304(2) states, in part, that an improvement fee must be calculated to include only the cost
of projected capital improvements needed to increase system capacity for future users. In other
words, the cost of planned projects that correct existing deficiencies or that do not otherwise increase
capacity for future users, may not be included in the improvement fee calculation. An improvement
fee may be spent only on capital improvements (or portions thereof) that increase the capacity of the
system for which it is being charged (whether cash - financed or debt - financed).
B. PROJECT
On July 14, 2009, the Tigard City Council adopted a new Park System Master Plan. On July 26,
2011, the Tigard City Council adopted a Trail System Master Plan.
The City contracted with FCS Group to update its parks SDCs based on these recently adopted
master plans.
> FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 2
We approached this project as a series of three steps:
• Framework for Charges. In this step, we worked with City staff to identify and agree on
the approach to be used and the components to be included in the analysis.
• Technical Analysis. In this step, we worked with City staff to isolate the recoverable portion
of planned facility costs and calculate draft SDC rates.
• Draft Methodology Report Preparation. In this step, we documented the calculation of the
draft SDC rates included in this report.
•:•>FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 3
SECTION II: METHODOLOGY
This section provides a non - numeric overview of the calculations that result in SDC rates.
A. REIMBURSEMENT FEE
In order for a reimbursement fee to be calculated, excess (i.e., not currently utilized) capacity must
be available to serve future growth. Our analysis of the two recently adopted master plans indicates
that the City currently has no excess capacity in its parks system. Therefore, no basis for a
reimbursement fee exists.
B. IMPROVEMENT FEE
The improvement fee is the cost of capacity- increasing capital projects per unit of growth that those
projects will serve. The unit of growth, whether number of new residents or number of new
employees, is the basis of the fee. In reality, the capacity added by many projects serves a dual
purpose of both meeting existing demand and serving future growth. To compute a compliant SDC
rate, growth - related costs must be isolated, and costs related to current demand must be excluded.
We have used the "capacity approach" to allocate costs to the improvement fee basis. Under this
approach, the cost of a given project is allocated to growth in proportion to the growth - related
capacity that projects of a similar type will create. For example, suppose that a city's master plan
included the acquisition and development of 100 acres of new neighborhood parks. Suppose further
that our analysis determined that 30 acres were required to meet existing demand, and 70 acres were
required to serve future users. In that case, only 70 percent of the cost for any new neighborhood
park would be eligible for recovery with an improvement fee.
Growth should be measured in units that most directly reflect the source of demand. In the case of
parks, the most applicable units of growth are population and, where appropriate, population
equivalents. However, the units in which demand is expressed may not be the same as the units in
which SDC rates are charged. Many SDCs, for example, are charged in the basis of dwelling units.
Therefore, conversion is often necessary from units of demand to units of payment. For example,
using an average number of residents per household, the number of new residents can be converted to
the number of new dwelling units.
C. COMPLIANCE COSTS
ORS 223.307(5) authorizes the expenditure of SDCs on "the costs of complying with the provisions
of ORS 223.297 to 223.314, including the costs of developing system development charge
•:;> FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 4
methodologies and providing an annual accounting of system development charge expenditures." To
avoid spending monies for compliance that might otherwise have been spent on growth - related
projects, this report includes an estimate of compliance costs in its SDC rates.
D. SUMMARY
In general, SDC rates are calculated by adding the reimbursement fee (if applicable) component,
improvement fee component, and compliance cost component. Each component is calculated by
dividing the eligible cost by the growth of units of demand. The unit of demand becomes the basis of
the charge. Figure II.1 shows this calculation in equation format:
Figure 11.1 - SDC Equation
Eligible costs Eligible costs of Costs of
of excess capacity- complying SDC per
capacity in + increasing + with unit of
existing capital Oregon = growth
facilities improvements SDC law in
Units of growth in demand (e.g., new demand
residents)
Section III of this report provides detailed calculations related to growth in demand, which is the
denominator in the SDC equation. Section IV of this report provides detailed calculations on
eligible costs, which is the numerator in the SDC equation.
•:;> FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 5
SECTION III: GROWTH CALCULATION
This section provides detailed calculations related to growth in demand, which is the denominator in
the SDC equation.
A. RELEVANT TYPES OF GROWTH
Parks and recreation facilities benefit City residents, businesses, non - resident employees, and
visitors. The methodology used to update the City's Parks and Recreation SDCs establishes the
required connection between the demands of growth and the SDC by identifying specific types of
park and recreation facilities and analyzing the proportionate need of residents and employees for
each type of facility. The SDCs to be paid by a development meet statutory requirements because
they are based on the nature of the development and the extent of the impact of that development on
the types of park and recreation facilities for which they are charged. The Parks and Recreation
SDCs are calculated based on the specific impact a development is expected to have on the City's
population and employment. For facilities that are not generally used by employees (e.g.,
neighborhood parks), only a residential SDC may be charged. For facilities that benefit both
residents and employees (e.g., community parks), an SDC may be charged for both residential and
non - residential development.
B. POPULATION GROWTH
Having established the relevance of population, we now quantify expected growth in population and
convert the result to dwelling units.
B.l Expected Growth
Based on data from Metro and the Population Research Center at Portland State University, the
City's population is expected to grow from 47,838 in 2009 (when the Park System Master Plan was
adopted) to 63,042 in 2028 (the final year of the plan). In other words, the City is expected to add
15,204 residents over 19 years at a compound average growth rate of 1.46 percent per year.
B.2 Conversion to Dwelling Units
Residential SDCs are initially calculated based on costs per capita but are ultimately charged based
on dwelling units. To convert population to dwelling units, we analyzed data gathered for Tigard
from the 2005 -2007 American Community Survey. Table III.1 shows the resulting conversion
factors:
4 FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 6
Table 111.1 - Residents per Dwelling Unit
Type of Dwelling Unit Residents
Single - Family 2.69
Multi- Family 2.15
Manufactured 1.63
C. EMPLOYMENT GROWTH
Having established the relevance of employment, we now quantify expected growth in employment
and convert the result to population equivalents.
C.1 Expected Growth
Based on data from Metro and the Population Research Center at Portland State University, the
number of persons employed within the City is expected to grow from 43,929 in 2009 (when the Park
System Master Plan was adopted) to 58,840 in 2028 (the final year of the plan). In other words, the
City is expected to add 14,911 employees over 19 years at a compound average growth rate of 1.55
percent per year.
As used here, "employee" means someone who works in the City regardless of place of residence.
Employees may live inside or outside the City. Later in this report, we will be more concerned with
non - resident employees in particular.
C.2 Conversion to Population Equivalents
The parks and recreation facilities described in the recently adopted master plans were mostly
designed with the needs of both residents and non - resident employees in mind. It is therefore
appropriate to allocate the cost of these facilities to both residents and non - resident employees. The
only exceptions are neighborhood parks. These facilities were designed for the needs of residents
only. It is therefore appropriate to allocate the cost of these facilities to residents only.
While most parks and recreation facilities benefit both residents and non - resident employees, these
two groups do not utilize parks and recreation facilities with the same intensity. To apportion the
demand for facilities between non - resident employees and residents in an equitable manner, a non-
resident- employee -to- resident demand ratio must be calculated based on differential intensity of use.
First, we estimate the potential demand for parks and recreation facilities. Table III.2 presents
potential use by different population groups in a manner that averages day -of -week and seasonal
effects. These averages are based on the maximum number of hours per day that each population
group would consider the use of parks and recreation facilities to be a viable option.
•: : >FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 7
Table 111.2 - Potential Daily Demand by Population Group
Non -
Residents Residents
Non- Work Work Work
Employed, Ages inside outside inside
Season, Day, and Time Ages 18+ 5 -17 City City City
Summer (June through September)
Weekday
Before work 1.00 1.00
Meals and breaks 1.00 1.00
After work 2.00 2.00
Other leisure 12.00 12.00 2.00 2.00
Total weekday 12.00 12.00 6.00 2.00 4.00
Weekend 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Total summer 12.00 12.00 7.71 4.86 2.86
Spring /fall (April, May, October, and November)
Weekday
Before work 0.50 0.50
Meals and breaks 1.00 1.00
After work 1.00 1.00
Other leisure 10.00 4.00 2.00 2.00
Total weekday 10.00 4.00 4.50 2.00 2.50
Weekend 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Total spring /fall 10.00 5.71 6.07 4.29 1.79
Winter (December through March)
Weekday
Before work 0.50 0.50
Meals and breaks 1.00 1.00
After work 0.50 0.50
Other leisure 8.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Total weekday 8.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00
Weekend 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
Total winter 8.00 3.71 4.43 3.00 1.43
Weighting factors
Summer 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33
Spring /fall 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33
Winter 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33
Total weighting factors 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Daily weighted average hours 10.00 7.14 6.07 4.05 2.02
We then multiply the weighted average hours derived in Table I11.2 by an actual count for each
population group. The counts in Table III.3 are based on the 2000 Census. Although these data are
now stale, the accuracy of the individual counts is less important than the proportion of each group.
Table 111.3 - Total Potential Daily Demand
Non -
Residents Residents
Non- Work Work
Employed, Ages inside outside Work
Ages 18+ 5 -17 City City inside City Total
Census counts 9,140 7,270 5,798 15,821 27,382 65,411
Daily weighted average hours 10.00 7.14 6.07 4.05 2.02 4.56
Total potential daily demand 91,400 51,929 35,202 64,037 55,416 297,984
•: : >FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 8
We then apportion this potential demand among residents (four population groups) and non - residents
(one population group), as shown in Table III.4.
Table 111.4 - Demand by Place of Residence
Proportion of
Population Group Hours Total Residents
Residents
Non - Employed, Ages 18+ 91,400 30.67% 37.68%
Ages 5 -17 51,929 17.43% 21.41%
Work inside City 35,202 11.81% 14.51%
Work outside City 64,037 21.49% 26.40%
Total residents 242,568 81.40% 100.00%
Non - residents 55,416 18.60% 22.85%
Grand total 297,984 100.00% 122.85%
As shown in Table III.4, non - residential demand represents 22.85 percent of residential demand.
This is the non - resident - employee -to- resident demand ratio.
4FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 13
Table IV.5 - Projects for Linear Parks
SDC -
Estimated SDC Eligibile
Project Phase Timing Cost Eligibility Cost
Tigard Triangle Area (P3) Planning 0 -10 years $ - $ -
Tigard Triangle Area (P3) Develop 5 -15 years 250,000 48.26% 120,643
Commercial Park Expand 5 -15 years 545,000 48.26% 263,002
Englewood Park Develop 5 -15 years 1,104,000 48.26% 532,759
Englewood Park Add local 5 -15 years 236,000 0.00% -
amenities
Fanno Creek Park - Lower Develop 0 -10 years 2,115,000 48.26% 1,020,639
Park
Fanno Creek Park - Fanno Improvements to 0 -10 years 135,000 0.00% -
Creek House indoor space
Fanno Creek Park - Park Develop 0 -10 years 850,000 48.26% 410,186
Gateway
Fanno Creek Park - Upland Develop 0 -10 years 1,100,000 48.26% 530,829
Park
Proposed Senn Park Develop 0 -10 years 250,000 48.26% 120,643
Undeveloped Linear Park Design 5 -15 years 15,000 48.26% 7,239
(P7)
Undeveloped Linear Park Develop 5 -15 years 260,000 48.26% 125,469
(P7)
$ 6,860,000 $3,131,408
This list satisfies the requirem ents of ORS 223.309(I).
B.4 Open Space
Projects for open space have an estimated cost of $1,391,783, as shown in Table IV.6. Of that,
$815,658 is eligible for funding by SDCs.
Table IV.6 - Pro ects for Open Space
SDC -
Estimated SDC Eligibile
Project Phase Timing Cost Eligibility Cost
Open Space Acquire 0 -10 years $ 206,190 58.61% $ 120,838
Open Space Acquire 0 -10 years 206,190 58.61% 120,838
Open Space Acquire 5 -15 years 206,190 58.61% 120,838
Open Space Acquire 5 -15 years 206,190 58.61% 120,838
Open Space Acquire 10+ years 206,190 58.61% 120,838
Open Space Acquire 10+ years 206,190 58.61% 120,838
Open Space Acquire 10+ years 154,643 58.61% 90,629
$1,391,783 $ 815,658
This list satisfies the requirem ents of ORS 223.309(1).
B.5 Trails
Projects for trails have an estimated cost of $11,700,000, as shown in Table IV.7. Of that,
$7,957,821 is eligible for funding by SDCs.
•:;> FCS GROUP
•
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 14
Table IV.7 - Projects for Trails
SDC -
Plan Estimated SDC Eligibile
Project ID Timing Cost Eligibility Cost
Fanno Creek (already funded) 0 -10 years $ 670,000 68.02% $ 455,704
Fanno Creek (already funded) 0 -10 years 300,000 68.02% 204,047
Westside Trail (to be ODOT - funded) 0 -10 years - 0.00% -
Tigard Street A 0 -10 years 634,000 68.02% 431,219
Krueger Creek B 0 -10 years 160,000 68.02% 108,825
Fanno Creek C 0 -10 years 1,040,000 68.02% 707,362
Fanno Creek & Tualatin River D 0 -10 years 1,609,500 68.02% 1,094,711
Pathfinder - Genesis E 0 -10 years 715,000 68.02% 486,311
Summer Creek F 0 -10 years 742,500 68.02% 505,016
Fanno Creek G 5 -15 years - 68.02% -
Fanno Creek H 5 -15 years 206,500 68.02% 140,452
Tigard Street I 5 -15 years - 68.02% -
Tualatin River J 5 -15 years 140,000 68.02% 95,222
Tualatin River K 5 -15 years 2,045,500 68.02% 1,391,258
Washington Square Loop L 5 -15 years 183,000 68.02% 124,468
Fanno Creek M 10+ years 1,631,500 68.02% 1,109,674
Ascension N 10+ years 461,000 68.02% 313,552
Washington Square Loop 0 10+ years 666,000 68.02% 452,984
Krueger Creek & Summer Creek P 10+ years 495,500 68.02% 337,017
$11,700,000 $7,957,821
This fist satisfies the requirem ents of ORS 223.309(1).
B.6 Allocation to Residents and Non - Residents
After determining the total SDC - eligible costs, these costs must be allocated between residents and
non - residents. As mentioned previously, neighborhood /pocket parks do not benefit non - residents, so
they do not receive an allocation of that facility type. Other facility types are allocated using the
percentages computed in Table III.4. This allocation is shown in Table IV.8.
Table IV.8 - Allocation of SDC - Eligible Costs
SDC- Residential Non - Residential
Eligible
Facility Type Costs
Neighborhood /pocket parks $ 9,601,430 100.00% $ 9,601,430 0.00% $ -
Community parks 34,859,120 81.40% 28,376,386 18.60% 6,482,734
Linear parks 3,131,408 81.40% 2,549,062 18.60% 582,346
Open space 815,658 81.40% 663,970 18.60% 151,688
Trails 7,957,821 81.40% 6,477,909 18.60% 1,479,912
$56,365,437 $ 47, 668, 757 $ 8,696,680
84.57% 15.43%
After this allocation, the residential share of SDC - eligible costs is 84.57 percent, and the non-
residential share is 15.43 percent.
C. COMPLIANCE COSTS
The City incurs costs in the development and administration of SDCs and may recover those costs as
provided in ORS 223.307(5). We estimate recoverable costs during the planning period of $660,000,
as shown in Table IV.9.
•:;> FCS G RO U P
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 15
Table IV.9 - Estimated Compliance Costs
Estimated
Activity Services Required Cost
Master plan update Consulting, staff $ 300,000
CIP management (parks and Audit, consulting, financial 300,000
recreation portion) reporting, legal, staff
SDC methodology review and update Consulting, staff 60,000
$ 660,000
D. ADJUSTMENTS
On January 25, 2011, the City issued Series 2011A General Obligation Bonds with a par amount of
$17 million. The purpose of the bonds was to fund capital projects related to parks and recreation.
According to the issue's Official Statement, a bond levy will fund debt service of nearly $22 million
during the planning period (through June 30, 2028). Since the project list for the bonds largely
coincides with those projects listed earlier in this report, it is appropriate to reduce the total SDC to
be charged by the amount of taxpayer- funded debt service. Table IV.10 shows how this adjustment
reduces SDC - eligible costs by $16.5 million.
Table IV.10 - Adjustment for Bond Levy
Fiscal
Year
Ending
June 30 Principal Interest Total
2012 $ 395,000 $ 899,536 $ 1,294,536
2013 625,000 665,625 1,290,625
2014 645,000 646,875 1,291,875
2015 665,000 627,525 1,292,525
2016 685,000 607,575 1,292,575
2017 705,000 587,025 1,292,025
2018 725,000 565,875 1,290,875
2019 750,000 544,125 1, 294,125
2020 780,000 514,125 1, 294,125
2021 810,000 482,925 1,292,925
2022 845,000 450,525 1,295,525
2023 875,000 416,725 1,291,725
2024 910,000 381,725 1,291,725
2025 950,000 304,950 1,254,950
2026 990,000 304,950 1,294,950
2027 1,030,000 262,875 1,292,875
2028 1,075,000 216,525 1,291,525
$21,939,486
Overall SDC eligibility 75.37%
Adjustment for bond levy $16,535,648
Finally, because the City's SDC fund has a balance of $2,426,083, the costs to be recovered by SDCs
can also be reduced by that amount.
E. SUMMARY
Table IV.11 summarizes and allocates SDC - eligible costs after all adjustments.
•:;> FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 16
Table IV.11 - Adjusted Allocation of SDC- Eligible Costs
SDC- Residential Non - Residential
Eligible
Cost Type Costs % $ % $
Facilities $56,365,437 84.57% $47,668,757 15.43% $8,696,680
Compliance 660,000 84.57% 558,168 15.43% 101,832
Bond levy (16,535,648) 84.57% (13,984,346) 15.43% (2,551,302)
Fund balance (2,426,083) 84.57% (2,051,760) 15.43% (374,323)
$38,063,706 $ 32,190, 818 $5,872,888
•: :> FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 17
SECTION V: SDC CALCULATION
This section provides a detailed calculation of the residential and non - residential SDCs.
A. RESIDENTIAL COST PER CAPITA
As shown in Table IV.11, total residential costs are $32,190,818. As shown in Section III, we
expect the City's population to grow by 15,204 residents during the planning period. Dividing these
numbers results in a cost per capita of $2,117.
B. RESIDENTIAL SDC PER DWELLING UNIT
When we convert population to the dwelling units described in Table III.1, we can determine the
total SDC per dwelling unit as shown in Table V.1.
Table V.1 - SDC per Dwelling Unit
Residents
Cost per SDC per
Type of per Dwelling Dwelling
Dwelling Unit Capita Unit Unit
Single - Family $2,117 2.69 $ 5,696
Multi- Family $2,117 2.15 $ 4,552
Manufactured $2,117 1.63 $ 3,451
C. NON - RESIDENTIAL SDC PER EMPLOYEE
As shown in Table IV.11, total non - residential costs are $5,872,888. As shown in Section III, we
expect the City's employment to grow by 14,911 employees during the planning period. Dividing
these numbers results in a non - residential SDC of $394.
D. SUMMARY AND COMPARISON
Table V.2 summarizes the calculated SDCs and compares them with SDCs currently in effect. To be
consistent with the City's "Master Fees & Charges Schedule," all SDCs are calculated to the nearest
cent.
•:;> FCS GROUP
TIGARD, OREGON Parks & Recreation System Development Charge Study
March 23, 2012 page 18
Table V.2 - Comparison of SDCs
Fee Change
Type of SDC Current Proposed $ %
Residential, Single - Family $ 4,048.34 $5,695.57 $1,647.23 40.69%
Residential, Multi - Family $3,254.20 $4,552.23 $1,298.03 39.89%
Residential, Manufactured $ 3,209.17 $3,451.22 $ 242.05 7.54%
Non - Residential, Per Employee $ 274.81 $ 393.87 $ 119.06 43.32%
E. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT
We have reviewed the City's method for annual adjustment of parks SDCs as summarized in the
City's "Master Fees & Charges Schedule" and described more fully in Exhibit "A" of Resolution 01-
74, which the City Council adopted on December 18, 2001. Because the index constructed under this
method includes both land costs (based on data from the Washington County Assessor) and
construction costs (based on data from the Engineering News Record), it is an especially appropriate
index for adjusting parks SDCs. We therefore recommend continuation of the current practice.
•:; >FCS GROUP
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 -D CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: April 24, 2012
( Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve
your concerns through staff.
This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All
written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend
or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public
record.
NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF
Please Print CONTACTED
Name:
Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will
help the presiding officer pronounce:
Address
City
State Zip
Phone No.
Name:
Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will
help the presiding officer pronounce:
Address
City
State Zip
Phone No.
Name:
Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will
help the presiding officer pronounce:
Address
City
State Zip
Phone No.
CITIZEN COMMUNICATION
UP COM I NC EVENTS
P LEMENTAL P�1
FOR / -1fQ(
� (DATE OF OF -/�''� da `Z a
( MEETING) la /ay a
1 Good Morning Tigard (GMT)— Business Networking — 7:30- 9:00am - FREE
• 4/26/12 — Chamber Ambassadors
• Hosted at the Tigard Chamber of Commerce, 12345 SW Main St, Tigard OR
• 5/3/12 — SuperMedia
• — Hosted at the Broadway Rose Theatre, 12850 SW Grant Avenue Tigard
• 5/10/12 — Tigard Area Farmers Market
• Hosted at Young's Funeral Home Parking Lot, Corner of 99W and Warner St.
5/17/12 — Fred Meyer Jeweler's Washington Square
• Their location
Other Chamber Events
Lunch Local — No Host Lunch, 2 & 4 Wed of each month 11:45 a.m. to 1 p.m.
• April 25th Oswego Grill in Lake Oswego
• May 9th Davidson's
• May 23rd China Sky - King City
• June 13th Sonic - Pacific Hwy
• June 27th Cheesecake Factory
Shining Stars Community Awards— 04/27/12 @ Embassy Suites— 6:00 — 9:00 pm
Business, Networking and $ €X (not what you think) Tour — 5/3/12, 3 -7 p.m. at Crowne Plaza Portland,
Tickets $60 by 5/1/12 — A BNI event, with Tigard Chamber as a supporting sponsor. Exploring how gender
differences influence how we network and do business.
Farmer's Market Opens, Sunday May 13 2012, Young's Funeral Home Parking Lot, 9 a.m — 2 p.m.
T ip,
FARmERS
MARKET
GROW. GATHER. GIVE. •
See our website for more details http: / /www.tigardchamber.org /site /ShiningStars.php
For more about these and other events, go to www.tigardchamber.org/site /directory /events
To sign up for our newsletter, e-mail info@tigardchamber.org and put newsletter in the subject line
IGAR 1 D ��rr''1
�.EE•oF 1
w S0-04e-s4 us on FacebookO
MMMERCE
Tigard High School FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET
g g y
0i;)
9000 SW Durham Rd. • Tigard • Oregon • 97224 (DATE OF MEETING)
(503) 431 -5518
April 24, 2012 — rLdtt 1
Student Envoy: Courtney Bither
Activities
1. Tigard's Got Talent was on the 5
2. Mr and Mrs Fierce took place on the 17 for free prom tickets!
3. Friday the 20 was our academic week assembly.
4. The week of April 22n -28 we are celebrating Earth Week and putting up new painted
recycle bins.
5. Prom is on April 28 and is themed A Night in the Spotlight, old Hollywood.
6. All month there are Sparrow shirts for sale in support of our sparrow Junior, also a raffle is
in the works for students and teachers who want to compete in the sparrow bowl in May.
7. New NHS members are being inducted in late May.
Athletics
1. Boys Lacrosse has been having games every Tuesday and Friday night. Girls are on Tuesdays
and Thursdays most weeks.
2. Track has started having meets and had one on the 11 vs. Glencoe at home.
3. After a few weeks of rained out games, softball is having games now and we played at
Tualatin on the 16
4. Tennis will be having matches almost every Tuesday and Thursday.
Arts
1. Seussical is still in the works!
2. GSA and Unity club are having a poster contest for "Discrimination Free Tigard High"
Academics
1. Academic Week and the assembly was on the 20 and lots of people were recognized for
GPA, attendance, turnaround and class act.
2. The quarter ended the 12 and no school the 13 for grading.
3. Today the Juniors took the ACT, sophomores took the PLAN test, and freshman took the
EXPLORE test.
4. IB tests begin next week.
5. The Rotary Award banquet will take place May 6.
AIS -900
3. A.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 04/24/2012
Length (in minutes): Consent Item
Agenda Title: Approve City Council Meeting Minutes
Submitted By: Cathy Wheatley, Administrative
Services
Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda
Information
ISSUE
Approve City Council meeting minutes. The March 20 and 27 minutes will be submitted no later than Friday,
April 20 or set over to the next business meeting for consideration.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Approve minutes as submitted.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached council minutes are submitted for City Council approval. (Dates of meetings are listed under
"Attachments" below.)
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
N/A
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
N/A
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
N/A
•
Attachments
February 28. 2012 Minutes
AIS -885
3. B.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 04/24/2012
Length (in minutes): Consent Item
Agenda Title: Approve 2012 Application to the Department of Justice for an Edward Byrne Memorial
Justice Assistance Grant
Prepared For: Alan Orr Submitted By: Tom Imdieke,
Police
Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda
Information
ISSUE
Should the City Council approve a grant application to the Department of Justice in the amount of $11,143?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Approve the grant application.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Department of Justice has issued a grant solicitation notice for the 2012 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant. This is a formula grant with a minimum based allocation available to eligible units of local
government. The City of Tigard can receive up to $11,143 under the formula and does not require any local
matching funds.
It is the intent of the Police Department to submit an application with the funds to be used for upgrading the briefing
room equipment that is used at the beginning of each shift. The new equipment would provide for greater
interactive discussions and briefings with officers using GIS data, information from the WCCAA computer -aided
dispatch system, and etc. The existing equipment is older and would justify replacment but by having upgraded
equipment, briefings would become more efficient as well as providing data in a format that would generate more
in -depth planning and discussions. The newer equipment would also be used for officer training as well.
Under the grant application guidelines, applicants must submit documentation that the grant application was
approved by the governing body as well as providing citizens an opportunity to comment on how the funds would
be used. As a consent agenda item, this would meet the review conditions of the grant. The grant will need to be
sumitted by May 14, 2012.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
None
COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS
N/A
DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION
N/A
4
Fiscal Impact
Cost: $11,143
Budgeted (yes or no): No
Where budgeted ?:
Additional Fiscal Notes:
The city would receive $11,143 to fund the upgrade of equipment in the Police Department briefing room. No
matching funds from the city are required under this grant.
AIS -890 3. C. 1•
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 04/24/2012
Length (in minutes): Consent Item
Agenda Title: Award Pavement Management Program - Slurry Seal Project Contract to Blackline, Inc.
Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Financial and Information Services
Item Type: Meeting Type: Consent Agenda -
LCRB
Information
ISSUE
Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for the city's Pavement Management Program - Slurry
Seal project to Blackline Inc.?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for the city's Pavement Management
Program to Slurry Seal project to Blackline Inc. and authorize the city manager to take all necessary steps to
execute the contract.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The yearly Pavement Management Program (PMP) protects the city's investment in the street infrastructure. The
program typically includes a combination of minor maintenance projects (slurry seal applications) and major
maintenance projects (pavement overlays). Slurry seal applications are used throughout the country to restore
deteriorating streets. Deterioration occurs as rain, sun, and freezing and thawing cycles eat away at the sticky
asphalt binder that holds the pavement together. In a slurry seal application, the street is cleaned, cracks are sealed,
and a hot, liquid mixture of asphalt emulsion and sand is applied to the roadway. The mixture hardens as it cools.
The process restores the asphalt binder near the pavement's surface and extends the useful life of the roadway.
The city issued an Invitation to Bid on March 26, 2012 and advertised the project in both the Daily Journal of
Commerce and The Tigard Times. Bids were publicly opened at 2 pm on April 5th with the following results:
Bidder's Name - Bid Total
Blackline Inc. - $370,882
Valley Slurry Seal - $398,954
California Pavement Maintenance - $509,389
City's Engineer's Estimate - $403,566.
Staff has reviewed the bids and has found Blackline, Inc. to be a reputable company fully capable of performing the
work required on this project. Therefore, staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board award the Fiscal
Year 2012 -2013 Pavement Management Program - Slurry Seal contract to Blackline, Inc. The City will contract for
the pavement overlay portion of the program under a separate contract solicited and issued at a later date.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
The Local Contract Review Board could chose not to award the contract.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
N/A
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
While this is the first time the Local Contract Review Board is considering the FY 2012 -2013 Slurry Seal contract,
this is a annual project and the Board has seen each previous year's award recommendation.
Fiscal Impact
Cost: $370,882
Budgeted (yes or no): FY 2012 -13
Where budgeted ?: Street Maintenance Fund
Additional Fiscal Notes:
This contract for the construction portion of the Pavement Management Program - Surry Seal project is estimated
at $370,882. The overall project has $1,300,000 in construction costs for the three components of the overall
project: Crack Sealing, Slurry Seal, and Pavement Overlay. The Crack Seal contract is estimated at $90,000
leaving $1,210,000 for the other two components. With this contract at $370,882 the amount remaining for the
construction portion of Pavement Overlay component is $839,118. As this project is for Fiscal Year 2012 -2013,
all amounts are contingent upon budget approval by the Budget Committee and City Council. No construction
shall begin until appropriation are granted.
AIS -784 4
Business Meeting •
Meeting Date: 04/24/2012
Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes
Agenda Title: Arbor Day: Receive Tree City USA Growth Award and Present Tree Stewardship Awards
Submitted By: Marissa Daniels, Community
Development
Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main
Update, Discussion, Direct Staff
Information
ISSUE
Annual Arbor Day report and recognition of the City of Tigard's activities and accomplishments in support of the
urban and community forest.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Receive staff report and Tree City USA Awards and an award from Oregon Community Trees recognizing the
city's leadership and accomplishments in advancing urban and community forestry projects and activities.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Arbor Day
J. Sterling Morton first proposed a tree planting holiday, Arbor Day, which was celebrated on April 10, 1872, in
Nebraska. Today, many communities across the nation celebrate trees on Arbor Day. The state of Oregon declares
an entire week as Arbor Week, instead of a single day.
Here in Tigard, there are many ways for residents and business owners to get involved and help the city celebrate
Arbor Day. Events are planned all month long.
Highlights include:
• Nature Hike with Tualatin Riverkeepers
Saturday, April 7 1 1:30 -3 p.m. I Tigard Public Library Puett Room I Ages 5 and up
• SOLV -IT Ivy Pull
Saturday, April 21 1 9 a.m. -1 p.m. I Fanno Creek House (13335 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223)
• Drop -in Open House - Proposed Urban Forestry Code Impacts
Wednesday, April 25 (10 -11 a.m. I Tigard City Hall Permit Center Conference Room #1
• Arbor Day Family Story Time
Friday, April 271 10:30 -11:15 a.m. AND 11:30 a.m. -12:15 p.m. I Tigard Public Library Puett Room
A list of additional activities and ways to celebrate Arbor Day are available at www.tigard - or.gov /arborday.
Arbor Day Planting and Celebration
Mayor Dirksen will celebrate Arbor Day on April 24, 2011, planting trees with the sixth grade class at Fowler
Middle School. The students are preparing a special presentation to share with the Mayor during the celebration. All
City Council members, the Tigard Tree Board, and Tigard - Tualatin School Board members are invited to attend.
To celebrate Arbor Day and earning the Growth Award, the city and the Tigard - Tualatin School District (TTSD)
will join forces to plant over 60 trees on the Fowler Middle School campus and over 100 trees on the Tigard High
School campus (Attachment 3).
Tree City USA and Growth Award
Brian Wegener of Oregon Community Trees (and Tualatin Riverkeepers) will present the 2011 Tree City USA
Award and Tree City USA Growth Award at the April 24 Council meeting. Tigard is the recipient of its eleventh
consecutive Tree City USA Award and its fourth Tree City USA Growth Award. These forms of national
recognition honor Tigard's commitment to urban forestry. The Tree City USA program is sponsored by the Arbor
Day Foundation in cooperation with the National Association of State Foresters and the USDA Forest Service.
Oregon Community Trees 2012 Urban and Community Forestry Award
Oregon Community Trees (OCT) — the state urban and community forestry council - annually honors outstanding
individuals and organizations for their leadership and accomplishments in advancing urban and community forestry
projects and activities in the state of Oregon. The City of Tigard has been chosen for the 2012 organization award
based on the city's accomplishments under Mayor Dirksen's leadership (Attachment 4). The OCT awards recognize
powerful examples of inspirational individuals and organizations engaging citizens, promoting tree planting and
quality tree care, raising awareness and knowledge about Oregon's trees and forests and protecting Oregon's urban
and community forests to improve the quality of life in towns and cities around the state.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
N/A
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
N/A
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
On March 27, 2012, Mayor Dirksen signed an Arbor Month Proclamation declaring April as Arbor Month in the
City of Tigard.
Attachments
PowerPoint
Arbor Day Flyer
Planting Plans
OCT Press Release
C I T Y O F T I G A R D
Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done
a "
TIGARD
Arbor Day
2012
Community Development April 12, 2011
C I T Y O F T I G A R D
Help Us Celebrate!
A list of events is available at www.tigard - or.gov /arborday.
Nature Hike with Tualatin Riverkeepers
SOLV -IT Ivy Pull
• Drop -in Open House: Proposed Urban Forestry Code
Impacts
/ Arbor Day Family Story Time
C I T Y O F T I G A R D
Arbor Day Celebration
/ Fowler Middle School sixth - I '
grade performances _
4�
r
"V`
t if i i ■ , - .
C I T Y O F T I G A R D
Celebrat Plant , ' `'''s
MN 'RI °R CO. a`MK St.a
\ '.. NO ! i armar..”._ nu ,c-x.
/ To celebrate Arbor Day, the .� .�. «°0.'°`M '
c. +. ,euR°. o• .� NM' 9C A,P, ♦ I.M( �NfY Ti
City and the Tigard - Tualatin i �
._* _ y 7 h _ wi P! Sv6l .r�.
i / 1 opus. r'.;4; w
School District (TTSD) joined - - s. ,.. _ : a `e.
'^A ", SD '1 ,SM1
1
forces to plant over 60 trees ������
9 3 , t „ -_; ;nar°
on the Fowler Middle School W. �°'`"` °���`
campus. y-
In addition, over 100 trees,
were planted at Tigard High
School. 1 1 .1
4
C I T Y OF T I G A R D
Tree City USA Oregon Community Trees
• Tigard is the recipient of • Tigard is the recipient of
its eleventh consecutive the Oregon Community
Tree City USA Award and Trees 2012 Urban and
its fourth Tree City USA Community Forestry
Growth Award. Award.
C I T Y O F T I G A R D
Tree City USA 1
We met the four
requirements to
become a Tree City USA !
for the 11th consecutive %�"
year. t. ' � �"' ` ! i .
, mss` �} � ;
r Jj
t: I ' 1 O I 1 1 (, \ It 1)
Growth Award
/ Tigard is the recipient of . ..,- •
r�-
a Tree City USA growth ` "+, 0 , 4
award for expanded
urban forestry efforts
including:
Developing the city's first ,
tree inventory, _'
Hosting a community wide
open house on the Urban
'v " IV l
Forestry Code Revisions.
AL
C I T Y O F T I G A R D
Urban and Community _ s Air.„,-,,,,„, ,-.
Forestry Award '
v 0 4
14,0
/ Under Mayor Dirksen s i ;�,. '". ,r Ai
leadership, the City of 0 .. d
Tigard has made significant
,'
' fi���. t ; : •
a •
accomplishments in a� '4, ., 4ti
p 1
promoting and expanding ,* ��fi . ''' k
urban forestry programs I
,tc Ai and providing access to :- " i ^: . t
nature. t
C I T Y O F T I G A R D
Thank You
■ To all of our volunteers and
residents who have planted
and cared for trees over the
=r
past year — thank you! , ,
='R= o- -
t •
4
j` . ;[,
"a. ` �� -.�.•
�• y " rL
w •
•
T e
t c Mr�..�s ens
r 3
' .. - —
PLEASE JOIN THE CITY OF TIGARD IN CELEBRATING "
CELEBRATE ALL MONTH LONG
Arbor Day is celebrated nationwide on the last Friday of April. On March 27, 2012,
Mayor Craig Dirksen proclaimed the entire month of April to be Arbor Month here in Tigard.
ATTEND AN ARBOR DAY EVENT
The Lorax Party
Tuesday, March 27 12-4 p.m. I Tigard Public Ubrary Community Room I Ages S and up
Caking all Once -lers: Join the Lorax as he speaks for the trees. Watch the original film and enjoy special drop -In activities and crafts celebrating
"Mother Earth." Is your Lorax lore a little light? Come see the film and youll get It right.
Nature Hike with Tualatin Riverkeepers
Saturday, April 7 I 1:30-3 p.m. I Tigard Publk Library Puett Room I Ages 5 and up
It's International Beaver Day! Learn all about our tree-chomping friends, make your own nature journal, and join the Tualatin Riverkeepers for a
wetlands hike behind the library. Wel hike rain or shine, so bring your rain boots -just in case!
Urban Forestry Code Revisions Public Hearing
Monday, AprIl 16 17 p.m. I Tigard Town Hall
The Tigard Planning Commission public hearing on the Urban Forestry Code Revisions has been continued to this date. The purpose of the hearing
Is to ensure that Interested parties can offer relevant testimony to influence the Planning Commission before they make a formal recommendation
on the Urban Forestry Code Revisions to qty Council. For more Information about the Urban Forestry Code Revisions project, visit
ynvw.tlgard•or.gw/ukr, or contact City Arborist Todd Prager at 503- 718 -2700 or todd@tigard-or.gov.
SOLV - IT Ivy Pull
Saturday, April 21 1 9 am -1 p.m. 1 panne Creek House (13335 SW Hall Chid., Tigard, OR 97223)
Help Tigard get "Earthy" on Earth Day. Our newly purchased Fanno Creek House came with beautiful mature trees. Unfortunately, they are covered
with yards and yards of English Ivy. English Ivy In an invasive non- native plant that climbs trees, weakening and even killing them over time. Let's
work together to free the Fenno Creek House trees by removing this invasive ivy and making room for a creek restoration and native plant garden.
We will provide water, snacks and lots of good energy! Parking is very limited at the site so please park at City Hall and follow the signs to the event.
For more information contact Carla Staedter at 503-718-2788 or carla@tigard- or.gov.
Drop - in Open House — Urban Forestry Code Impacts
Wednesday, April 25 1 10-11 a.m. 1 Tigard City HM dank Canter Conference Room 91
Trees play a dynamic role in increasing quality of life In urban environments. Drop by during this timeftame to chat one -on -one
about the proposed code amendments with City Arborlst Todd Prager. Information Is also available online at www.tigard-or.gov /tfcr.
Arbor Day Family Story Time : �
FAday, April 27 1 1030 -1k13 a.m. AND 11:30 a.m. -12:15 p.m. I Tigard Public Library Puett Room • S
Being the whole gang for storks, songs and super -duper silliness! TIGARD
TREE CITY USA
The National Arbor Day Foundation has honored the City of Tigard with its Tree Co) CSA Growth Award for a fourth straight year.
This is the 11th year Tigard has earned Tree City USA recognition for its commitment to urban forestry.
( itj of Tigard I Communit) Deielopment Department I 13125 SW flail Bird. I wwtt.tigard- or.goi
•
Nt .. ,, --. M t3 I A i
•
C' I l 2 wa
sr : J 2
SITE r!'•
• S IT,.. O� • I III
+ .' '4,..,.0, . ,r T ' f' sty s —.cr. q I �'""
„.. � ^y,. gam' ,,�
4' r� ` • "L ♦ •�• r... . NT —7T "'}'.f t . • '. B FOWERMDDLE WILCOX l am Menu •
.: R F • ,� i I G _. � i - .......1 OREGON 4 �
` • ._ � s e '. �____fl. ` -.. 'r - . 1 1 1 / \ �.' ' ",c4•% • • `r _iii: \ — --
am DUNMMAOAD
N VICINITY MAP N LOCATION MAP
B -•• N AREA OF WORK MAP o
N., o
2
N
p F
PROJECT TEAM GENERAL NOTES DRAWING INDEX B 1 A
cc O WNER'S REPRESENTATIVE I. ADVISE THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS OR W F 2
TODD PRABER.CRYON NN
TIGD
DISCREPANCIES I MVO, WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO STARTWO WORK SHEET 7IILE SHEET TAR�BER j
IR ALOOCSATEPLAEWMBSRLST C JWINS J W
N
03 H A STAGING AREAS IG
ARE TO BE WITHIN THE DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION
11 RANTING PUN LI I.E.
TIGARD. OR BI]]] LIMITS AREA S. F THE CONTRACTOR REQUIRES ADDITIONAL EA,TIEVSHAU.
PLANTING PUN u
ISOR 7154700 SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST TO THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE
KIRIGATION PLAN u
]. VERIFY ALL SITE CONDITIONS BY SITE VISIT PRIOR TO BID SUNASBld1. iFIRICIATION PLAN u
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT • ALL MTS. HOLES. ETC DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ARE DETAILS AND NOTES - - - -LI
TROYYEAPB, RIA REQUIRED TO BE COVERED ARDOR BARRICADE AT THE END OF EACH
LEARS DESIGN OIP. LLL AY DURNO CONSTRUCTION.
ON
PO Dm 0554 VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UIVTES PRIOR TO COHSENCENINT OF
TIGAID. OR OINI WORK FOR PUBLIC PROPERTY LOCATES CONTACT TIOARD PUBLIC
DOS NTMTB WORKS DEPARTMENT. Tell 71e -EE01 AND THE UTILRES NOTIFICATION
IKEA 50A4NA FAT Hoe, 1300344 HOT LESS THAN 45 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING MN"
FOR SCHOOL PROPERTY LOCATES THE CONTRACTOR IS Ji JNEYL
REWIRED TO HAVE PRIVATE PROPERTY LOCATES COMPLETED FOR NNE —
7 00Valt MET
1
son
LO
4-
3-orecdnc.k I �rRkxrRRleS — — - - a
en.nn uege ' I I e..e.. I - i — _ w ranae�s=kc. o /11
sA v AM, 9 Av
• Existing Asphalt f�{�� _
PebveybRxnMn , Y. 1 • •� 7� anan a ru xe x... 2 A y
Ty pRal .e «...w... I ❑ R 8
°' u. ,a +. W
1-Crimson King Maple 4 p
I • — I I
4 a �� a
w R
i
• / ' 1 "j i a�eKm Go G g 1I � g''''`'A nM a w r f rest .x se. I. ! 'I
BASEBALL FIELD ��`
�� �`,
i
screen v.e. zelke.e -- ';'7=7.--" ru x. ,— ; r.ovs HEARS r
'.V Ann�n°me�r: L'n —' Z
II — - J O , OREGON R5
Tygral1 _ l l H r u ex x... 1 PE �� AR
w 0 ��
]- Autumn Purple Asti �# r ru xa v.�.,
o S�� o._r w
II FOWLER MI D DLE W
0I r �
Sons. Axle— • ._ �
I y >� xe
COWB Canopy �� ' LL
ON. -Typkal _. 1I��� SCHOOL rO
lknMs -TpkY EtlaXrq im b . M� - 4Comeon Ring Mepb fY
RemNn - Typld ��CONCRETE ' i
.- Pine 1 1T_ t _ls I.Green Vase Zelkow Z //,} verrmE[x is RERAN ua[uor�cmv®[rrortn I J
1 I
x W
C) til
1. o , r 4. w d I s u
2Gaenepfe linden SyrexvpYe Linden I 0 Z 3 e
vu Y `- Ens9 Tr V ✓. ' E ` WN - p� 7.75./7 — o
1 � —
R as Typo, -_ 3' /� � LL
r PARKING LOT , , `.s i Vase KK # O
-2- Crimson King Mavis J f - - '�'"" y —
M� D M CYeeasgx Linen
"� TENNIS COURTS --
(5
.as..7
' PlAMR10 PUN
r te, (' h es.. r �x.
�\ ( REFER TO DET
r� ( �. r' �.� A IL L5 FOR
JJJ
PLANTING DETAILS 8 NOTES
) -,� SCALE: I•= 30' -0• i
sw e
i ` 41 L
wvAn ST. i3' IS 30 0 e
+
a:
,
1 1 1
I ) '' .....N...
, , SW TRCES g i fl 1
E.t.a Mat. Forested Ares _ . I 1 T —., .,
.
' ....
Aowox cemoy ■ ' ' 1 6 hes pram 0.7..7 7 z c., me 7701
I
- Ty , ., ED c.....„....
, ' ■
Limas Tyolag --",
Rem. Tyolad
t. .
X t3 :
'4 W i te.
I thie4.....s.- ■
. r. E I.-. 1 11•IM 1 . i
mg= i
-- 7 . \
r ----- -- - 1__i 11
OH
FOOTBALL FIELD I ' — """ •0
-..-, _ ='_, , ' - 1 1 ' 11 It t ■ ,,, 0 p.,.................. a r oa. ma 1.... ,;.- IROV A MEARS U
7 7 1
11 ,. ( OREGON 4
,- 5 Pagoda Domvood 11- ^ g it. I , ,.. ... .... I
o
FOWLER MIDDLE -• ' 1 I 1, i I T "..—= , ...' —
1 , .........,_
..
x v z.vvvv. 0
. .1 . 1 •• I 1
SCHOOL
.
coma no. To room usans on... oanm Ct
I I °
11
I 1 I 5
,
'2
I
, 1 L3 z ce
Z I I Ekft71% Choin4. fence
Aagoxim. Locabon 0 Z , 0
0
I- 3-Na.r, Eguo CVV , H
_ l' ' , $15ew ,. --I • '2J t4 i
- p- ,-
— 3
0
,-- - , %%We, , ' -• • 1 : .- 1 . so 0 . • 1 ..._
,0 Arla.rat Pear I I
2 Ga. Vase Z... —
- ' - ^
C
' C Z
( ff „
.„...
''' '' , ..■71 - ' Fonts. Ana
0 ‘ Tver Bourag n04117NB
k 0 PARKING LOT
J
■ _
t
6141711M17
0.4111NO RAN
-
!‘7.--N11 0 1 ._ I
I REFER TO SHEET 1.5 FOR i —
DETAILS & NOTES
-rr _ ,_, ,
, ....
....
PLANTING ) . 7 ___ 1..
SCALE I” - 30
CC
-J
V '-'-----
s .
\ 81.3■11,1.41011 MOW'
\ 1.1.1111.121■111./11.1101.01 . * IRRIGATION SITE G N ERA...L + . KEY ii:
................z
.• .441.70001••■•••• ,,,, • ...
WM DIESORITION
. \
IS
Palmy 10 Nevin / , '-- V -------- , _r IIIIIPSISOYSSSIDIMIS710NOVALSe -MS MIMEO .• . I 2
..r-: MASS NO 1111101.0104 IMISLIM.SSM AS MOM
SAINITN • M. AWN,
MAW KM OISTALLSTRINOI -. 1 ' .., I --. CUSS IMMO UMW, .1110.0110
NIL LINSIIIISASSPOS ISICSIVINV I 2 f;
co +
•IVERIII701:11[1.1.SIS [ I —04— 1111IRKIWI VOL UM IISW.SE
-4E exams ■• 0...4counamv•are-rdoewrocoral. 0 1 i
Mill 1 E i
, / a . %NOW: PIIP IMPOLOWITBEIS SONTINISICOU1.1, WPM
BASEBALL FIELD ., A -(7 0 1911.11.111M0SIDISWAWISSAS MOM
0 COMM WSW SVISINSI• IIIMIRIVALVE WV
0 rmom mu. inftwason•menstrooma pt.
• • •0• ra) IIIIIMISSIIISIIMI-1 .
. J
. .... 004 • •
tJ . . . Ur TIRIELOSAIIMI reNNT000.N.a.
• •-• 1•001,1‘11.. t
,
.-...—.— nminnaoNor 1911.00AN.00=anSkaamasi
. OREGON ,Z5
temontersism.sarroonftwoom-
- I I'
/ i --- \-- lb
d.Q1 /55 ,C4:.
1 r 1U
...... ' ' _,—. oratenc••■5555.30.—, w VALVE KEY
<\ . . - ouoccounotvoLve -..// ,... '•.„, \J 1 1 co
•
FaN0100 Am
0.00M. COW/
, .7 .5..5s, FOWLER MIDDLE Zia CO
DESIGN CRITERIA
en...
0.1..Y. • SS IS SA
: ..•
1 • 1,0•41.11E / ;,....:V =, CONTROLYNASsee . . . .
SCHOOL
Coorifolobry .,..,,,:;....,...,. ,. . . 4 , :, ' !..1•::::, , TRW., liSKIMION• WM
5
Unos.rbplet • i ,
• r. TO Wt. 2/1.6• TYPICAL
. .
§ •Mt■PINGICYNE0011.1.1011SYSTEM•a•NE0ON30R04•00.1..
V SF I I . 1•Itle.St o SAWCAJT • MT. Km.,
vAvsili IFOII SISTALISI ION Of GENERAL NOTES —1
, 1 111UNSir AMMO% LOCATION
MAIL .5 • gme000■Gosawymmesoams,0..........0em•wwo
SISE.10 0 '
• NZ. VIIIMOSIIIPIM1147.411 1.01•11.11.AMSPOSS x t
01.• " ,w.,a , ... 2, - i • WISHILIMMSYSINIINIMISIVS••111•1.,11014,101.014•SSMIMITIS.
ll .,
IP --- - . % VW" .----- —_ /1: - II • OISSMIIII0111.1.STAIIMMOVOLVebt-IIRMILVISSM.,•11.0■00.1,".
. ry......................
• INIII.MIMPLUISMITHINTIS MIS ..4101.00VAN• et1 ,e ir)
LLI 0.
• 417.1$1 110.11,0LeS.O. ■1
VP OEMS 1•0170.E.T01
ERNINISISSOOSSWPS
ME TISSAMICIRLOCATIOS•
F rO -00.0N6 NAN,' 1 ......................,”...may. C1 z . 5
.,
• 7S011111.11.11.1:01.1111.7081.IIVE11101.1.1a0NOTIWINISS F
g d
I .........,vr. ,,, *
va..........-74, ..,_, 1 4 .........1.04 =0i
1.r. / .0.0... • rucc coon00.masTor nolvensnommura
a p
. / -1
.....)47../ .1 .„.. ■1 Mr/ s ' I
r Le
_
- - . . N -4 A .- ■r a , , 1 1_,-4&-.11E" - -*■----4^-4 LI 1 g I
1, TYPICAL
', c ..., 2 ,..'. .7, '7. '.....". 1 f ,71i, ,'`• ' 7
0 PARKING LOT cSift T;
•
/ : - 1 ------- -___ '''
TENNIS COURTS
...-- -..- -.........
•
■ — —
r NAN
—
h
1 1
.
TES
! I REFER TO SHEET LS FOR
IRRIGATION DETAILS & NO
• ',,,__ __„,-,_ _AO filiallill j') 1 /
_fr ,
/
_ SCALE: I'. 3V-0' L3
aw WALNUIRT. I
+
Nit: 1
1
I .... 1.0.11........
1.1.1..11 YAM - . 1
'.- -
. , IRRIGATI01■1 SITE GENERAL KEY
- .F
SM. DESORPTION EL-
i i !
Existing AVMS Forested Area -,
1 Paltmayta Rem. BK... OBBOBB ', rC _
Covet Bound., , - , 0 .
i ,) 1:. '' g i.
3k-,,,: _rz, 0.......110.1.0.01011.1.ME• sum . tarzo
• ..... *
. . -
■a- CLASS 2001.0.7.11MEME -SIES 4.107.1
._.
I i_ • :
, ,i S.M.& P.M OSP., 1.1 _r_' cuss so; Pvc Wm. ,Bin AS NOM
.-
------- - - - „
P.M EMMSTALMION Of § 1
E .. . .
. .
Ik 40 . .14 ' . /11E1 .....„.,........,......
-RETESTS 11.10 WS 1 1 MO Iii
111111.10118......1 YESSE. - SME MS .......1. ILI - •
,
111,......
I Virriff" , • . "
• -
. , •• , .. _ -1 — - ,- APPROX MGT.. ULM.
4 71 MP 1/11.1.01.0 .1101..171.101.110010 • SEMI iii 1
1 1
,_,.,___ _ __
• ,
r .1 0 EMMEI IS111.411M VALVES .N01110 --'
ill el
', 1. • ' •.'•'\ • I ''' 1 swan, !WOO ASPBOBT . .
IA MM.. VI.E 11.1111.1.1..... M SE WY
1 ' 1 ' ..d ib l i46' "PEAZA ' 11H 1* 1 MING MR .61.471. OF 1 - - 1 11
PA ME 11.1. LOOM. - 1 1 ' ' , • 1
I 4 0 TREE WM MAIG.plON SEMI /co.,. zne
1 I iler ..... V-1;;;..111lii
• WEEP 70 OCAS. (ELS i 1 FOOTBALL FIELD I i ED MIMES EPEE LOW.. . WM 70 SHEET 1.1 407,N
;-. ,„ IMITE RESOME111 ,.. 111.1.1.1= TREE • SU MEET 11 FM • •
111 i ,j\c„...e, - .11171100.1.1001 EOM A14
4, OREGON A t.
ri
__ FOAM II•04Ar PM - SAE AAA TOE PAMPA -
VALVE KEY 'lb-1 xv- c4:.-
ea' ',PR ALLA ' or
•
.......au.r.,••.8 0•••••ox 11, — ', W t 4 P 4, ' , ..1 COPIROL WAVE MP , , „ I , . .
LOPArrom II -' 2 6 .
11 1 , -• -'•••-•-7.11'i I
_I ly L ';' , CONTROL VALVE SPX 011 1 0 1A 1 d I
, .
1- .
LU FOWLER MIDDLE 0
01 W DESIGN CRITERIA 1 .
LU 1 '
x SCHOOL Il , , , A1P OESIPH OF PE PRIOATION SWAPO IS APAPP ON X P.8.1. 0 At OAP
(/)
w , , / 1;'
.
GENERAL NOTES . _1
, .
LU ' , •
I ' 0
U3
1 , • .
f•• , • ...r..... •.•••••••.•. • ..,..........,.....................”,....
1 0 1
11.1 ,, • 00.1.1.1.80.11.1......E.1.1.4.........13.
• room nBcao0uone BBB Boa me w A movo,utow A lot BF, aovitoomms 1 6 ,., t
z I , ' • ••
• 0........1.1.1.........................11. 1
7 - 1 II, - SYS.801.1.1.13.1871.
1 _ - CONC WALKWAY FOR • 1 .........1.6 IMEIMPEPOSIME v.■ Ty
i 'l i -- ri - 1 Italx1....suaye THIS
AR.. 1. OCKI10.1 ' • otox,....os,ox MTN 7C• , WAILS VO4. rao cxee
• ......0X...............M. ESOKI.L...... 1 0.1 Ef. ~ 3
. . ..................L......L......... n Z 0
..1 .................. _,............,......„...,,......,....„.....,,,r,o. n 1,1
.e nus ArB.BOK ■ ocapox I ' \ ..../\\ :L ''' - APE PM IRIPPAPON - REA. . I • AAA( WILIAM WOE 3 TO V Amp...up
TO Dem. b. • TEM. 1 5 5 s
'ii ,,. ;11._3_ : tf (17 . . . • - , _ ,
• -
:. , . : • LL , -- 2 ; 3 ia— ' — ,
L . .. .. .' : •• - • • •• - , . ". —•
..
L " 0 " .■11137- 117/LrET"'"Er.J ......571M LISNLMAL M SORE 11.11.11 1
MS.. SALVE .11E /P.M 1 12j
REE.71.1 ELEM.. EMMY 1..............°..... ,
LOCMON
L . SE-ES'F'0E-1 . • .".7_ '
- Tr
n. I.. 7.1.1.
',. .../
• -,11,
f' . * Forested Area
BIBBBB ...BY
, Cove...owl,
1 \
• 2 Limits - Typical o.n.o.
6 PARKING LOT
_ .
1.1
...T..
I 1
' InIuGAIICN IKAM
I' , •••••••• _wt.
REFER TO SHEET 15 FOR ......
--
. IRRIGATION DETAILS & NOTES
; .
,
l'' _LI
raper
SCALE: I'. L4
,..
- • • — • , - • • • - • ,, 1 - 1. _
1
wATEnARODF WNr.cnW me.I BATE vAnE LL
D p
1.9109MP.MUME WYE PUMA.
ri 47.114../1,..' . 1 a L . _ .. PRESSURE BE.IxA,oNI - r - CARSON VALVE BO. up e8
�� - 1 VALVE . SLR.. z .9 � ,,� W x ID . , :* MM ea. xwcows L ' . . .
P.V.C. .ABNOTED 1;
� . °8 ".ma i sKL �Hli Me,E — y S W
' l .a.6 BBwx.,« - ,lox. L Rfl
! a� N rraaF;gll a ' t — MD Bxex "g
,gy g �, I MsI „F V.L..% ill eI
' !' • �" , , ".DD.DN EDE .B wa ISOLATION / GATE V ALVE D
.� .� �� - 71 4°12%
e 13019.1 aanNnNC I � `E.�.o1T PVC...
0 (MAINLINE GATE VALVE SIZE - 2'AND SMALLER) N
1::.._ :: : ., DKe.Yx.AN�DeM x ,. .,R e.,ME R
�MDDEL EP_I�D,
i N . .E, RW,RAI.1 ON ONDIST AKO sa.
1 DRIP CONTROL VALVE MANIFOLD =Yet ` "�0v._0 OREGON
s c `
L6 (KC2 - 100 - LF DRIP MANIFOLD KIT) eMBxeR/D! 4.C.'' PE A0.
9,,,.. uBi lucLUDf
2 v DIA OF ROO, . w e T <,.. , V T;f xEmLIErrtBGiED
I '''''' WILK MUMS AFTER UMON
9 x101 BMRBN aA D _ N
911.1 nNr 5 a ANY TREE A6 YFCIPED >, B P'M T j
4 E"G EA S'C CF C
wKI0T00 O PER TREE L. ... '1.�
TREE PLANT NG DETAIL P.V.C. reOP PIPE awP
' I I 1
NOTES
7:'"a. " O RE^�M
N. R PERPERA .ezarclom ` PAIOVOE avroar oR E • oEVICEs
_ MHO. I
o P.v.c RPwTIwr sE ABNmswIVEL.e
2. CONT.. 91 MAY BE SUBSP 91.0.11. OAS STOCIC OF KO. MADE
MN AMERICAN nu1nARD FOR NURRY S,O., Id _ /` sM.moN ORAVn.os � - ER
COM!8T8EF� KING O
DOUBLE CHECK BACKFLOW PREVENTER DETAIL U t
G �
x DscxF[ uwnccl wnox AR AL. - _.- - - ' ® INSTALL TO LOCAL CODEREWIREMENTS NTS V1 d G O Z NJ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR ioxer m WK ,TES. P — TREE wPE s Q Z = O A.C.REMOVAL SAM. Q 3
Illla q g p
�
I / xo w'wsiRwlmON.uBlxa 1.— arm xocK � u H U
w 3) 2. D AKES TRPOTO r j j m+xa n . R e .xD m ci.ul E .— W
.. E II,. W 3
T �I I , - = �I
e 1s ALTERNATE o A o
,u'rsr -aREns , Ar:R gASN ? NNE _- TloN io rxEE ROO,s. :� j I - .Le........ r... LL
PLAN � N -' e. SIZEASMOTEO III��� •
r ' BACNFLL PAW. AS REWIRED. •
r TREE WELL IRRIGATION DETAIL 6 SAWCUT SLEEVING DETAIL
939x000 x 12 GAUGE
(L5, IFS O NM
T —
Cyr" RE.Ir VF BOY1 OM . IRE E 10 CARBON VALVE BOX -GREEN SAL AFTER s,AKND YELeNUVER OVER ROOT BA. F E —
`: D
MLILCB LDNe CIRCLE . BASIN 11 z NN % ROOT BALI
x. «EDeR
.onx �NR;.Fx
. 01 «m L M MIR ASSPECNEO: - �FFxATeRSAGS A HAM _ . .eEBeR D. 1 DETAILS . NOTES • #, x , B. , , DN P N,N , } F REO.REUF R -- I .ARLIERMeNRM ,\(� - SUPPLEMENTAL WAY. MM.
SET xWTBALL ON uxp SNRBED SqL `^` �� �' `) .D
,'° °' R ' ° ' O DRIWATER PLUS IRRIGATION SUPPLEMENT EBAa�W
CONIFER PL ANTINC z " Bp' DETAIL LS 2• GEL PAC IN PVC TUBEWITN COVER/CAP V - s 000ICK COUPLING VALVE DETAIL (3 /0•) e L5
N S L5 s
SW DURHAM ROAD d
pt,w a o €
-bat = z
..• SITE ?F ■ IT} 1 1 y�j - � v a c • II
. . .. II 4,0
I
•
C TNW O U L-.
AMBA
• aVil _,__II •
amor c ph i
N VICINITY MAP N' LOCATION MAP 1Pl°1"°Tl "1"'iTi
Ni s N.T.s. J
N AREA OF WORK MAP ° a
=z
U '$
PROJECT TEAM GENERAL NOTES DRAWING INDEX
DAY PRIOR
a '
OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE I. ADWBEI CONFLICTS SHEET EET 'TITLE SHEET NUMBER („)
TODD PMOER • CRY O TIGARD
DISCREPANCIES ES 1 1( (TWO) O) WORKING DAYS PRIOR i0 STARTING WORT(.
_ BO COVER BHEET LA
ASSOCIATE MIS SW HO BIM. WARR�
2. BT OINO A AREAS ARE TO BE IN E WITH THE DESWNATEO CONSTRUCTOR PLANTING PLAN LI
ROAM. 521220 LEANS. F T
THE CONTRACTOR REWIRES ADDITIONAL AREA TREY SL
SUBMIT A MARTEN REQUEST TO THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IRJLNINBPIAN.__.... _.._____._.________________ -_�
ROM 71E2700 PANTNOPNV1 U
S. VERIFY ALL SITE CONDITIONS BY SITE VISIT PRIOR TO BID SUBMISSON. IRRIOATION SAN LA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 4 ALL TRENCHES. PITS. HOLES. ETC. WE TO CONSTRUCTION ARE IRRIGATION MN — — LA
REWIRED TO BE COVERED AND/OR BARRICADE ATTE END OF EACH IRRIGATION MM Ls
TROT MIME. M DAY PORNO CONSTRUCTION.
MEARS DEM. GROW. LLC DETAILS AND NOlEO L7
PO BP TBSN E. VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO COM1EOCEMEMO
TIGARD. OR 97ID1 WORK FOR PUBLIC PROPERTY LOCATES CONTACT TIGARD PUBLIC
W3I6014515 WOWS DEPARTAENT. NOB 716-2THE 5.1 NW T uMES NOTIFICATION IR 92,././ FAx HOURS PRIOR TOSAEMNO MAIO
WOW 5(90RED TH I SCHOOL PROPERTY LOCATES THE CONRMCTORM MI_ JIM_ JiglIM. a
REWIRED TO HAVE PRIVATE PROPERTY LOCATES COMPLETED FOR THE
31TE. � — —
C01ER N@T
LO
*Under SW DURHAM ROAD
• _� a _ ... - \ t , .— •
a
\SIGN 4_✓ * ...s�.� – I 1 I W_ •
v
.1 PARKING LOT , PARKING LOT "` ` � - I - I 2 p 8
TIGPFO HIGH SCHOOL I I a
I '�
1 I 12
MI 1
1 TENNI CI:-' I s J �"- .r �1
} .:�'. * il l .. '"
.� '� nom, ON t
r – .; } I OREGON 4==
1
✓ h
f. Z -,___*/ A PE A • � F I RG�
1
:. \ w
– - - - I 1 PARKING LOT W
w 1
I
essrWC Cw wsw \ 1I
x
wx¢.ws �C r:�. .
U
g � � R TIGARD HIGH SCHOOL '.
a T� .�-
1. \ ',, s , - \ —
\ \�y r I U d i O 0
1 I: GYM ■. •• ( u 3 2
N f
-
�_ ,�,..,.. �;�` >.,,.en, a... su...vrarw. Y V F O
O
TEIS I$ COURTS (�. ,.. Q N a
- SCOREBOARD • `!tiY • ( F ,
w
i . k � u • hI
CAwC+[ Li�af ,�
IN
1,1
s wenwz.µ. - - \ •
• — I _ '�• +\
a
I F BASEBALL FIE t O ; -- / –I r , �
_ L .I _— _ MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET L2 1 � ' +'' ...+:
1 REFER TO SHEET L3 FOR PLANTING .,ye SCALE: 1' = 40' -0' L 1
SCHEDULE. REFER TO SHEET L7 4Ip�Wi �.-
PLANTING DETAILS & NOTES _ D m w so of e
a
__.),} ___._ _, ---- ■ --,-- — -. %7 / •■ ■• j --
MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET L1 1 " " " ''''
.,i 1
r. '
1 TT 1 1 I i:4,,\, i c ipl
/‘ *
-,-
FOOTBALL FIELD
21 I * 1 a
.., •Jestaent Nag
..,
' \
f ■
"'",.. '
0 I
1 in ii i
7 -°- - - - - • I ,
•
I =lig
---
/ Q . il ,
, SOCCER FIELD i i in I
l —1
'- --- • - - --Z -7- -: ___i - r \ (,.., i 1 ( . ' -
SCOREBOARD
n -- • Tn.. 1 .
0 . • •
41 1t . I
*‘
, 4. .6.. •■. •
'
t; nor r. mtniu t
..._, 4 ,, 4 e 6 4malp •,,-, „ 1
1111
ii 110 - .- - --
4 •Pc
1 c ,
r
,
1 i , . L _, 1 ■.... -,;.? ,
1 ' ,
SOFTBALL FIELD
_ el
. 1 ,
'
1 SOFTBALL FIELD I 1
a , I
—
- I
I - ■ '%,..,. I, ' x Y i 8
Y P E d
,,...o.: 5 5 §
0 ..
',-.,,
1 P
0 --.—
-------\ 1
Irp
r i 1
SOFTBALL FIELD 1 i L_
a SOFTBALL FIELD
0 I .
_±.) 1 3-............
....cm
- 1 '
. ,-"---
,:
. .
,..„........ ,
9111 1 9079 9017 I 9023 9005 5981 no 8943 8921 8905 8899 8887 8883 8845 8819 8801
1 1 I 1
1**"
REFER TO SHEET L3 FOR PLANTING , ' - SCALE V - 40'-O , L2
SCHEDULE. REFER TO SHEET L7
PLANTING DETAILS & NOTES ' 1 "
_,, o so so 90
. _ _
• ..wr.usn r.....1.1•=31=1.1. sM.,..l. MT OURMYI1MC PANTIMTERUIe LISTING: �A. r ti
o r. A .. ..111. An. A� IA& 4.1i 'Mao"""` , -
IVA '6 ATSIC � =id &AV4P s !f `V' v � 'ti _ . ` TREES an. ME COMM MOM g S } eminues ®
�•� +....n G I RS
POOL !BALDING OA a 1 •.`. n rag w ao . = ! 1
04 SOCCER FIELD Er P, ill E A .
C .
Ito um. .M
AK
�� "` r 1 O ff + &
J
� � � • . sv MI MM. PE
J. - • ( 1 Wit
TII sm..o. ; 6f 1.1
n.. ........ is rer a. w...
irojr SOCCER FIELD * 7 ; T T ,
e 1 11,, II il I ii,..
....
lop
' TM ° i/ YS ! a • f \ ''�'1. amlwmffS TO iFMwuML96 OTHER.. NOTED Q ., T"Wirifilrfid
a -.. - .
0 oeeotFn aar o. vmnranc,uaxTTO mureoarta
ems' ,.\� - If j ru,uTr.vm wEEn rac�M. woNm Rwwew . o ee ,..urMaac
MMTTO MM. E641N6eMfaaa OUR.. TOM
� e � BUILDING - - 1 i� BUILDING
- � 11.1.• . BUILDING
7 RANRq RAM
REFER TO SHEET L7 FOR S SCALE' 1•.4D -0' .e. L3
PUNTING DETAILS & NOTES Ill I G) o a e
4
---7-------4-,. — , ... _ — -^ms 7 µ >!s a saa��' a 1 a
� a
I SIGN ! ' r O S
Z
1 i.1 r,,--
SIGN %- { yy / 0•. ! . I S N°
PARKING LOT �� PARKING LOT w r (/ — `0 VII
r * TIGARO HIGH SCHOOL ( 1 = ? g
IEN c 0U s - 1 m `i oaEGGr
f I s
. -- _ � i t 9pE AR
y
- I PARKING LOT H
; a
Th P C R S _ f TIGARD HIGH SCHOOL � . � I
G 1 c
GVM
I J \ SCOREBOAR * # came *c n:vt p
1{
I
D p0 1
S s a
I E
1 ` —,—
. � . — I —I— . s.•.. -- eeeraee
-� ,- _
, 1 1
) . r _ FOOTBALL FIELD
AL I I wKUTgr 1 PLAN L - 1 s II BA EBALL FIELD
r L � J
I i_ _ _[ ae•.r � C r I I , - SE SHEET — ' . wen —_ -- MATCH LINE SEE SHEET L6 . L . i _ � '___,„,,,
� � w
I I I REFER TO SHEET LB FOR IRRIGATION SITE I SCALE: V w 40•-0 L4
1 GENERAL KEY. REFER TO SHEET 17 ��
I I IRRIGATION DETAILS S NOTES �II .' o so .so so ...
iiTI3 �—�— — — 1�� MATCH UNE -SEE SHEET L! -.- __L =� -�ti— —� 1 +
i o
1' FOOTBALL FIELD - z a S
/ Lave
9 r w� -
Xo a$
' ' I SOCCER FIELD
SCOREBOARD 4-'4) 1c L, C1, 1 ... T �.,, .... p � Y 5 `CJ g 4
„,..;ii,.. \ ,....... A !�. -- 1 -.� �� l - - - - - - 1 1 � , OREGON R
- -_ ("1/1E L09..
-_ i III
eK
SOFTBALL FIELD 1 I -` �- 1
I
,' 1',
SOFTBALL FIELD i � J � °_ 'k � _
I 1 6 I � T"T�
F.
■
�! o
O t
� o
V Q W
I I' = Z I O
V F
'"f 1 p p
_. — -.. 1
S VI
I • N ,
V', y I \ SOFTBALL FIELD ,m...,,, ,,,..,
I SOFTBALL FIELD I r
i -
H - �'
V ` .4 v -----7.--V- `� ''
.., % y
9111 9079 9097 9023 9005 8981 8967 8943 8921 8905 8899 8887 8863 8845 8819 K� 8801 _ �.
1 REFER TO SHEET L6 FOR IRRIGATION SITE SCALE: 1 - 40' -0 1 L5
GENERAL KEY. REFER TO SHEET L7 y ::�, r �
IRRIGATION DETAILS & NOTES �ID 1 m !n 90 -, e
+
SW DU.. ROAD
IRRIGATION SITE GENERAL KEY
Oh
S/7.1 DESCAIPTION
1 - — _ - --- ' ------- -`: - - •*:.' -- 7: - .•,:, -- .. - . -=' = .--' - '' = ' -' - - ' •-- -: -,
' WAS PAP. MEM .SIZE AB NOM 0 2
. . ..
-1--I ... nomoge mom nand! _ . , _ _ ...r.2 CUBS 00010110.41.0■111.E• BOX A4111,1‘13
1
POOL BUILDING SOCCER FIELD
, r"'' CUBS 200 PVC LAMA. stre ram
—PR— wounotosounoNvAiNE WAIFS. AS kvant.11e
I
I –0 00817.1011•00:4“../M41 VALVE PM" TO Oelfd. CV 1 ... i
MEM i
, ..
1 0.14.1f01.0 MP 7006 CMTP01. PDOULL AMR
III 70061.147 El g 1
_I
D MM. npnIATNG voLvf_s Asp'''.
■
E CONTROL VALVE IfUMBE11,001 11:1 ...YEW/ r
' 1 .
0 TREE WELI. IRPROATION fiffER 70 Cfl. 2/17
0
—1----- ,- .
I I_
1 I
i _, I (I) 11101CATESITEE LOCAtION • MITA 70 81.11.1
4 INOIC.r61./11r:111=1■00 • SEE Milt I.• PM . .
' t OREGON 4 5
,_._ Fx.M.11■11,t1Nil FENCE APRIOX1•01 LOCATICH
4e 'f , E x0"
L_I VALVE KEY
—
At 1" a 0 2.0
COMO_ VALVE 9.4. .10 111 1 0 10 I' 0
— - - - I - '. 1 DESIGN CRITERIA
SOCCER FIELD
1 I i THE DEMON Of ME INVOKIION STSTO/ IS NM 0.0 P .9 I • AO 0 Pll r
,.. . 1
,
.. GENERAL NOTES
• LAMSCAPECCINVINC100•11681,11m.F0M.I.177.w.LuOut 0.41. HAM
. StWACES. '
I CD
: "'" OIE "'"" :0.1. "'"' :117 ' 1 1 (11■7 7'"' ANDARO C'E P rO.1.180 7".*' : 7 1 • 110 " SCS *W"" : 1 .07M00 " 7 1 ,17.0 P" . 1 t5 O t-'‘" g Z
1 _
, • 1.1.K.E VAIVESN fixikl.e136 Axe. PC•Sete
, 1 • ......67 HEM .0U , nr .nr.OUPIP,O.W010 warn SIMS .00 Pects NC 1 5 Y i g
. r • Mak B.W1F MOWED Cot IrOP Cr Au.1.... ' y g ' 8 , j
. • nr0 MP aLLIE ....no . Au Pvc•Oal•E Twa Bro. al..8.1.o
!- — — - I 1 il • , I.AGE CON7791,11E 1, 6,11/1,110m1OBLIK al 3
1 .
...■,...,... .o.o. I :',==.itr"'"' -
. [3]
,,--"-, ,..' , % •___tiL k '.% ' . 'S % _ _ .3._ . ,. ._4__1%_ t• , So _ '
- 1
BUILDING
BUILDING
.0..0.
I AN._ _se, •
i —
17 Rasst "'' NoN puN
– – - — 1
r 1 „...,,,„ SCALE l• 40,0. , I
REFER TO SHEET L7 FOR ,,... L6
IRRIGATION DETAILS A NOTES 1 ilib I - ' I
•
3
-- - - -- WATER PROD, MOREiON WO LL
GATE VAV. , `�� � E BEEw,,,G.O� �� — W. AGE NR,�NEBA. uu _ P.>sNORME _•
AL ) �? �. �w " wOWe W � �,. �, ,T� .uW�. a j I CARRON P „B VALVE SOX ° i l : r.
�: e LTR� Ei 1 \ .a VALVE ISAIAS,W,ECN.Re Xi"
,,
3iNpa,filllla. I PVC NAPUE !•
_, -- - AREAS/ � '��'o`F'o° "r: "'� °` ��� 1 OEV.LVE,Ox oFC.rcLUCTN No.sREAANANUww
i / c
El 2
UNLESS
ii •T tr - IX SPEa - -- - oRSrWO.PPVG NAP..E t � '"s•- .. TNRUSrn.acK � 'QD
7 11111: : • • w L �
••'• RGB•N G Bs R�0 SOIL � 1' DRIP CONTROL VALVE MANIFOLD ISOLATION /GATE VALVE DETAIL OREGON . °V MARS ��
.� L7 (KC2-TDBtF DRIP MANIFOLD KR) (MAINLINE GATE VALVE SIZE - 2' AND SMALLER) NTS 4'c4 AR
k rO _ oRM147
A�GNG E.GN WC OF GOPRi4o.wAl N. E0 FREE AS EPEOR °
TREE PLANTING DETAIL DRIP DARTER • IE PER TREE
NOTES
HIS
NAPWRRD ummsun°N
NCO!
O . sNOWNOWwuVETOE 1`, 'G`'G I
7 CON 'AMER STOCX MA BC SUBSTITUTED MIN SAO STOOK CC FOGA MAX. . S. S.0 /', MAWR Roos J
5 1.14.04 Ali PLANTING RFOS 111711 7 MN. LAYER OF 'SPECIFIED N55.511.
6- 1 rAIAF5 no. 'l MO 4 f i o e
, s In <
uME n G N� ' at- o ,LEE rP0... W.G.TEa d ° §
, IANBSG.P CGNTRAC ON TO VERIFY TREE WANNTES P= r3= �ll�f __ = V a S
z o
_ �� TREE AS SPECIFIED P ` P T `E = F o ci
/ u
aO °PDwT " "V 0N�"° IJ SAWCUT SLEEVING DETAIL C H o F NTS FMtrtR- $ITNBi REE
T
/ ° m R wEinO - E ma,.c�om L 7
W
0
BOLESE EVERY ...°R„ RCA.
x
4 -- N G EEE ER Doti MRARBwO _
, NEBN.ERENGE.A,TERNA,EBN�EeI.,,-
Ea
G EPR.WDN�AGNBRB . TOTREEMOTS. •
-" Rr nREnSE 8 3' wn'Ea BASN -E- - °
� isimBUTroNe.ERAT ON TO TREE iWOTO
PLAN
. ., 1 I' E PIPE
�oiERU E - SOT AS NOTED N N
•
( TREE WELL IRRIGATION DETAIL o VALVE BOX .8
• ■ / - T r ✓ RUser / 00)06 L7 i I em i _ P«aN
.%. '. A Ai l -- ,reo it tsL r, � si.rLr'- wnuEO 1
TE STAKING. T A e0 LAYER OVER ROOT BALL
: -_
f1 7 , 'o soR
.. :, /r PVC / OmxA w EVau.Nmv vER V•..^ so
f e LA xo
CINCIE WATER U L U V ' x T i Y Niv .7._... 7 (EV� •w[rT,NE
9'.ECEB� °� r�E
\ ' _:::721. ,,, CO( 4L 1 / � ' A 1 KNOTED
��. � P V.C. M.WUrE
J `' SAWN_ SOIL u TURF AS S.E CrSEG- �� R• OE'lA�A
\••• _, / � • r A EE g AS EaIIR °POn Nµ°
\ E ••• p• •1
�, . N..IS .n BOT in,,, O. PI wARN.nwNEn�ER DURING
QUICK-COUPLING VALVE DETAI $ (3/ a') _ NL T.E YEAR
GRa A. BAGS AS SPECS-. 1..55
o" °! S °' A° ('- DRIWATER PLUS IRRIGATION SUPPLEMENT I 7
CONIFER PLAN ZING DETAIL \ L7 2' GEL PAC IN PVC TUBE WITH COVER/CAP N `•
4 II
NM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Vire April 6, 2012
OREGON CONTACT
COMMUNITY Rick Zenn, OCT President
TREES Direct telephone 503 - 488 -2103
Mobile message 971 - 207 -2703
Executive Committee
Rick Zenn
President Oregon Community Trees Honors Tigard with 2012
World Allan Wells Oregon Urban and Community Forestry Award
Allan Wells g Y Y
Vice President
Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation
To celebrate Oregon Arbor Week, Oregon Community Trees (OCT) — the state urban
Gail Langellofto-Rhodaback
Treasurer and community forestry council - announced today the recipients of the 2012 Oregon
Oregon State University Extension Urban and Community Forestry Awards.
Brian Wegener
Secretary g
g
Tualatin Riverkeepers Now in their 19 year, the OCT awards recognize outstanding individuals and
Kristin Ramstad organizations for their significant accomplishments and leadership in advancing urban
ODF Representative and community forestry projects and activities in the state of Oregon.
Oregon Department of Forestry
According to OCT President, Rick Zenn, "the 2012 OCT award recipients are powerful
Board of Directors examples of inspirational individuals and organizations engaging citizens, promoting tree
Art Anderson planting and quality tree care, raising awareness and knowledge about Oregon's trees
Northwest Shade Trees and forests, and protecting Oregon's urban and community forests to improve the quality
John Bellon
City of Klamath Falls of life in towns and cities around the state. We are proud to honor them during this
Maria Cahill special week."
Green Girl Land Development Solutions
Rob Crouch
Am y Jo Detwe iler
of Portland
Amy Oregon Community Trees is nonprofit organization led by a board of 23 volunteer
Detweiler
Oregon State University Extension directors from around the state representing business, government, education and
Ron Dyer
Eugene Water& Electric Board citizen groups. Partners include Oregon Department of Forestry, USDA Forest Service
Patricia
tyofSalem Farrell
City and Oregon State University. In addition to presenting the 2012 Oregon Urban and
Brian French Community Forestry Awards, OCT will host an annual "summit" conference for citizens
Ascending the Giants
Greg Giesy and professionals on June 7 at the World Forestry Center in Portland: Community
Distinct
myGrotta ibilities Landscapes N atural Areas: Restoration, Management and Enhancement featuring keynote speaker
Amy Grotta g g y p
Oregon state University Extension Doug Tallamy, author of Bringing Nature Home. Registration is now open:
Bill Harrington
City of Medford www.oregoncommunitytrees.org
Morgan Hollen
Morgan Hollen and Associates
BarbaraHollenbeck Organization: Mayor Craig Dirksen and the City of Tigard
US Forest Service
Brian Kelly
Hells Lesher Leshe r Preservation Council For ten years the city of Tigard has been recognized by the Arbor Day Foundation as
Laura
Sale ris m Shad eam Tree Advisory Committee one of the national Tree City USA communities in Oregon. Under Mayor Craig Dirksen,
Ch N
City of Wilsonville for the past four years Tigard has earned the foundation's coveted "growth award"
Gail sC recognizing the city's significant accomplishment in urban forestry. Mayor County g g y l
' g p' y. or Dirksen has y
Matt Stine expanded Tigard's tree planting program and greatly improved citizen access to nature.
Native Ecosystems Northwest P g p g p g ram 9 Y im p
He has led Tigard's Arbor Day celebrations and helped children plant trees on their
school grounds. Tigard has adopted new urban forestry policies, revised city codes, set
Oregon Community Trees canopy goals for the community and developed a new urban forestry master plan
P.O. Box 13074 including preservation of significant tree groves. Mayor Dirksen has embraced the
Salem, OR 97309 importance of education programs targeting trees and the importance of a healthy,
vibrant urban forest in their community. The passage of the $17 million "Parks, Trails and
Natural Areas" bond measure in 2010 is an impressive testimonial to Mayor Dirksen's
leadership and the value the community of Tigard places on its trees and urban forest.
The award will be presented at the Tigard City Council meeting on April 24, 2012.
Promoting healthy urban and community forests through leadership, education, awareness, and advocacy.
www.oregoncommunitytrees.org
Individual: William `Bill' Harrington, Medford
Bill Harrington is a highly respected professional arborist and park manager working for
the City of Medford. He has more than 35 years professional experience in forestry and
arboriculture and he is responsible for the care of Medford's 9000 street trees, park
trees, riparian forests, fuel reduction projects, and management of the community's
beloved 1700 acre Prescott Park. For many years Bill Harrington has led an active tree
planting program in Medford working with citizens, public officials and the local Tree
Committee to improve and protect the urban forest. Medford is well known in region for it
active volunteers and annual Arbor Day celebration. According to Frances Oyung of the
Bear Creek Watershed Council "Bill has been a tireless proponent of the importance of
trees in the urban landscape. His knowledge, skill and persistence have made Medford a
better community for everyone. Thanks to Bill, we have made huge progress."
President's Award: Dr. Phyllis C. Reynolds, Portland
Portland native, Dr. Phyllis C. Reynolds is the author of the popular book Trees of
Greater Portland (Timber Press 1993). She is recipient of the Spirit of Portland Award
and recently the Bill Naito Community Trees award. For ten years, Dr Reynolds served
as a member of the Portland Urban Forestry Commission and chaired the Portland
Heritage Tree Committee. Her passion for trees and energetic leadership helped the city
catalog and designate nearly 300 heritage trees of 121 different species in locations all
over Portland. Dr Reynold's has produced tree inventories for Reed College, Oregon
Health Science University, Catlin Gabel School and Laurelhurst Park. Dr. Reynold's long
time commitment to community service has led her to positions on the boards of the Hoyt
Arboretum, Japanese Garden Society, Berry Botanic Garden, North Coast Land
Conservancy, Nature Conservancy, Portland Garden Club, and the Oregon School of
Arts and Crafts. A retired clinic psychologist, Dr Reynolds is also an accomplished print
artist and photographer and her works have shown in galleries in Oregon, Washington
and the southwest. According to Oregon Community Trees President Rick Zenn "It is a
great honor for us to recognize Phyllis Reynolds this year. Dr. Reynold's has done more
than any one person to help Portland residents and visitors to see, protect and
appreciate their urban forest treasures. Phyllis Reynolds knows the trees in the like no
one else. As a scientist, artist and activist, she brings a very special perspective to her
work with trees and people. She is an inspiration.
2012 Oregon Tree City of the Year: City of Sweet Home
This year marks Sweet Home's 25 anniversary as a national Tree City USA and Oregon
Community Trees is honored to recognize Sweet Home as the 2012 Oregon Tree City of
the Year. For the people who live and work in Sweet Home, trees have always been part
of their daily lives. Beginning in 1987, citizens and civic leaders embraced the idea of
redeveloping their community by successfully leveraging grants, donations and public
resources to improve downtown streets, highways, schools, industrial sites and the
places like the Riggs Community Center. They conducted tree inventories, developed
local management plans, and organized tree planting activities. Today, Sweet Home
hosts the Oregon Jamboree country music festival and is well known to many travelers
as an exceptionally attractive tree -lined gateway to regional recreation sites. Next time
you are in Sweet Home, look for the Tree City USA sign and know that all Oregon is
proud of their 25 year quest to make their community and a better place with trees.
Promoting healthy urban and community forests through leadership, education, awareness, and advocacy.
www.oregoncommunitytrees.org
AIS -859 5
Business Meeting •
Meeting Date: 04/24/2012
Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes
Agenda Title: Approve the Purchase of the Eiswerth Property and Authorize the City Manager to Complete
the Property Purchase
Prepared For: Steve Martin Submitted By: Greer Gaston, Public Works
Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main
Information
ISSUE
Shall the council consider a resolution:
• Approving the purchase of the Eiswerth property as outlined in the purchase and sale agreement?
• Authorizing the city manager to take all necessary action to complete the property purchase on behalf of the
city?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends the council approves the resolution.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
In November 2010 Tigard voters passed a $17 million park bond measure. Eighty percent of park bond proceeds
were dedicated to acquiring park land and open space. The 2 -acre Eiswerth property is comprised of steep slopes
and riparian areas along a creek and would be used as open space.
In late 2010 the Park and Recreation Advisory Board was tasked with evaluating more than 60 potential park
properties. The Eiswerth property was one of the top ten properties on the list.
Located within city limits on Bull Mountain, the property is adjacent to a city -owned parcel to the north and the
Paull properties to the east. (The council authorized the purchase of the Paull properties on March 27, 2012.)
If the resolution is approved, the city will purchase the property for $65,000. Terms of the Purchase Agreement and
Escrow Instructions are fairly standard and have been reviewed by the city's real estate attorney.
Per the city's property acquisition procedures, a phase one environmental assessment of the property was
conducted. No issues were identified in the assessment.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
The council could choose not to adopt the resolution; the city would not purchase the property.
COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS
This property acquisition helps meet the Council 2012 goal 1. c.:
"Deliver on the promise of the voter - approved park bond by identifying all acquisition opportunities and
completing the majority of park land acquisitions and improvements by the end of 2012. "
DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION
Council discussed this property th p operty purchase along with other potential parkland acquisitions in executive session
on the followin g dates:
• July 26, 2011
• January 24, 2012
Fiscal Impact
Cost: $65,000
Budgeted (yes or no): Yes
Where Budgeted (department/program): CIP - Park Bond Acquisitions
Additional Fiscal Notes:
The city negotiated with the seller; the two parties have agreed to a purchase price of $65,000 - subject to council
approval. Park bond dollars will be used to purchase the property; park land acquisition is included in the
2011 -2012 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
Attachments
Resolution
Exhibit A - Purchase Agreement
Map Showing the Eiswerth Property
` y �. gy p - :1 fy
.„.k o ..sy - - - 1 . '. is
y
._..,...: 4 :'. ;', ' a: ' 7 '.' i' ..,/ . ' . frt ';', /g , ', - . '',- 4. , '., ,. ' ..,,' , ....f$ $ . ., - ,•,(... .. ... . . . ''# . . 44 $
CD
1
i �n '
' - - k' 4 II ::..- ' .f," ;:.:'e'' .1...' , ';'..- ' '* \ 6 b ''''' ..: , SL - : -. .: ,----- \ • _.--- - V.
bi
1 r
Yr '', 4 4 <
1
r
ti
i
� n Ari k — :3
- _ —
F r
�* .i ESC R T A; ` r, w
. .4
v TELLERS-JA [ , C.T Ii_ r J ,5�� ='l ��1
61 -,.. - ■ 1
n 4 ", ,---- . :-..... - , . _ w . >
- . -,,,, : . .. w ..tt,.,.,.40,p---- ;...„--...,::::‘, ..„,-.- ....
.. ,:,,- -_..,,,. i
4
t.'.
2 ),. . „ ,, / r
1
F j e W: , y� � • ri- ,1 11 yam .. L ,•,. , , •� 9 .. '�. p l y
a
r
i , ... ..... \ V' 11r. : - -,(.-e-:;i,,,,.'-• •..*r..,, : --," . i;. '
•v 1 - k x� • • - I�—
+.:,. s ,__ _ -� ; "- -A l y 1 it + ` % * 1Ik _
.'S{ k r Sir 1 -AN TA I' I' �
Mil .■
,,