Loading...
Correspondence ■ JMD Architecture 357 Chestnut Avenue #41, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 729 -2463 — (760) 729 -2451 fax RECEIVED • December 6, 1999 DEC 0 7 1999 Jim Funk, Plans Examiner COMMUNIII uEV1:r_UPMENT City of Tigard Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Project Name: Walgreens at Pacific & Gaarde, Portland 13935 SW Pacific Highway PC# : 9 -79C, 9 -78c • BUP #: 99 -00428 SIT # 99 -00063 The enclosed drawings are being submitted in response to plan check comments. We are coordinating the dedication of land to ODOT along Pacific Highway to reflect the road widening. Once that has been resolved we will formally record the new legal description with Washington County to include both parcels. I understand that we will not receive a Certificate of Occupancy until the legal description has been recorded but we may obtain our site permit. Please contact me if you have any questions or need more information. Thank you. Sincerely, / • Brandy J. Yamamoto JMD Architecture Encl. 3 sets drawings (C -1 to C -6 and A0.1 to A0.3) o r� JMD Architecture 357 Chestnut Avenue #41 Carlsbad A (760) 729-2463 yfit ' -2451 fax December 1, 1999 RECEIVED Bob Poskin, Plans Examiner DEC 01 . 1999 Jim Funk, Plans Examiner City of Tigard Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. COMMUI' I l utVtLUPMENT Tigard, OR 97223 Project Name: Walgreens at Pacific & Gaarde, Portland 13935 SW Pacific Highway PC# : 9 -79c, 9 -78c BUP #: 99 -00428 SIT #: 99 -00063 The enclosed drawings are being submitted in response to plan check comments. Below is an itemized response to each comment. SITE Item # Location Response 1 Excavation 2300 cubic yards Fill 1700 cubic yards 2 Attached a. Special Inspection form attached b. Copies of reports will be filed with office c. Final signed report to be on file before occupancy certificate issued. 3 Attached Engineering, planning, and water comments addressed, see below. 4 C -4 Concrete vault is located in planter south of driveway. 5 C -4 Area drains have been revised to catch basins 1/ 6 C -6 Catch basin details and specifications are provided 7 Filed A Tax Lot Consolidation has been filed at the Department of Assessment and Taxation or „Q.L el 1 f ^ ) — 7 u 'r (+ T et iv ✓ L Accessibility 6 Item # Location Response 1 A0.1 There is no ramp (other than the curb ramp) along the accessible route of travel. The curb ramp is detailed in 4/A0.2, is a maximum of 6 inches in grade difference and is sloped at 1:12. Handrails are not required at curb ramps or on ramps 6" or less in rise and 72" or less in length (UBC1109.7.6). prop e .. y - 7t •rrj Liu n For 1- - o 2 A0.1 See note above for curb ramps. Alivjw, f 4 0 a( el r,,c f P 3 A0.3 Detail 10 has been corrected and submitted to the city in the previous A+'t 4 e ( ( review. Drawings are on file with the city. Y J Fire Safety Item # I Location I Response — , Q1 JMD Archltecture DICK GRAUE 11 11/30/1999 . 14:18 FAX 1 760 729 2451 qlooe/000 11/30/99 12:22 '&303 884 7297 CITY oF TIGARD t* *kin - f crrf OF TUALATIN VALLEY PORE AND RESCUE _FIRE FLOW and HYDRANT WORKSHEET This worksheet is ire °tired to be submitted to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (Aal) before any permits far new building canstiuctiah, building expansion, or fire hydrants will be issued by any building department within The TVF&R District. Please complete. sign, and date the PREPARER INFORMATION block. Then complete the GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION block. Lastly. complete either item A B. and items C, D. and E in the CALCULATING REQUIRED FIRE FLOW block. Please clearly print all requested inforrnatiOn. PREPARER INFORMATION _ , • PREPARER: e7e6 s(atql ° MOT° PHONE: 1 9 141 241°‘ FAX: 100 12Cf • ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF RECORD: PHONE: 1/142-al- Z21 ?3 FAX: 90* - PREPARER SIGNATURE. - 9.111 - . DATE. 11 I GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: We.2‘0%1 Ci j ererer. _ _ 2. PROJECT ADDRESS: ‘ 90611 1 peA 1{1. se • CITY: _ 06We COUNTY: \ " 1 0 6411 "6h1 q 3. CONSTRUCTION TYPE(S): D Type I Fire Resistive or Type II Fire Resistive Q Type II Norwated or Type Hi Non-rated CI Type IV flietnry Titaber or Tinn 0 - 0 Type II One-lhour or Type HI On - - • ur )21 Type V Non-rated 3250 esrt-t - /EP% mont'revtei 4. TOTAL BUILDING ARF.A: P- Square Feet • 5. TOTAL FIRE AREA: 1 &2-O _ Square F eoo cebei • 5. BUILDING FIRE FLOW: 15°° Gallons per 7 ute (Trable A.11 - I - , 7. DESCRIBE THE FIRE AREA: ni al taw ire area 011111 e fit 1 * dr awing hwlic IN° Thuffstm Fre 1 -__&419 so' v °r° VOG 1 I ci;aliCS 0 ra00 of-f/C/S Y.ClotecrorvIS mem 8. TrE OF OCCUPANCY OR USE OF BUILDING: Peat i TN= LINE IS FOR FE DEPARTMENT use ONLY FMZ / / Revised July 1999 P' )4, q_) • V 1 Attached Fire flow & hydrant worksheet attached 2,3, & 4 C -4 2 fire hydrants are provided within 250 feet of the building. FDC is provided within 70 feet of hydrant. Location & quantity of hydrants have been discussed with Eric McMullen of the Fire District. Site Plan Review — Planning, Julia Hajduk Planning issues have been resolved and signed off. Site Plan Review — Public Works — Water, Mike Miller Item # Location Response ✓ 1 C -6 Standard notes and details have been added for 6" fire line. 2 C -4 FDC is located on plans near fire hydrant and vault 3 • Pending Water fees to be paid by contractor prior to commencing work. 4 C -4 Existing fire hydrant is shown relocated behind the new sidewalk to be constructed as shown on ODOT off -site improvement drawings. 5 C -4 Irrigation will be connected to south -east meter, domestic to remain at north -east meter. ▪ 6 C -4 Double check valves are provided at both meters. Site Plan Review — Engineering, Brian Rager Item # Location Response 1 Street opening permit has been filed with the city. 2 ODOT approval is pending. Letter from ODOT authorizing release of site permit has been submitted to the city.. 3 Storm water calculations are enclosed. • Please contact me if you have any questions or need more information. Thank you. Sincerely, Brandy J. Yamamoto JMD Architecture • Encl. 3 sets drawings (sheets C -4 & C -6, delta -4, 11/30/99) Fire Flow & Hydrant worksheet Program for special inspection services Storm water calculations for Brian Rager • JUL -06 -2000 10:27 P.02i02 PBS I M r I w O M M July 6, 2000 Attn: Darrel 'Hap' Watkins City of Tigard Building Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 SPECIAL INSPECTION SERVICES — SOILS: TIGARD WALGREENS 13979 SW PACIFIC HWY PERMIT NO. SIT1999 -00063 Dear Mr. Watkins: In accordance with the State Building Code, City of Tigard Requirements, and permit documents, we have performed Special Inspection Services - Soils for the following items: 1) Site Subgrade Preparations 2) Compaction Testing for all Fill Material 3) Inspection of all Footing Bearing Surfaces 4) Testing of all Base Rock Material Within the Building Pad 5) Testing of all Base Rock Material Within the Parking Areas To the best of our knowledge, the above items were constructed to the applicable workmanship provisions of the State Uniform Building Code and Standards, Project Specifications, our geotechnical report and field recommendations. Sincerely, PBS Environmental IN` k--J - - n, E.I.T. Guy M. Neal, P.B. Projec - otechnical Engineer Principal Engineer cc: Lloyd Spanke, Yorke & Curtis • Brandy Yamamoto, JMD Architecture ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING TOTAL P.02 JUL -06 -2000 10:27 P.01/02 pBs Ct• / 5 k' a C eN,i IONMfNtLL 1220 SW MORRISON, SUITE 600 PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 (503) 248 -1939 FAX NO: (503) 248 -0223 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FAX NO: DATE: TO: / • / / /e r L16- 6 !ti•.t _ f � COMPANY: . , ! 407 Z jcd ✓ r I' l ✓ Off .3 /W FROM: . TOTAL PAGES (INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL): Z- IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ANY /ALL OF THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL: AT (503) 248-1939. COMMENTS: ( tJ- ENGINEERDIO AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 1220 SW Monisom Sloe, Suite 600 Pollard. OR 97205 503/248 -1939 Fax 5031248.0223 MID EUGENp PORTLAND SCATTY$ TRI-CMES VANCOUVER • December 3, 1999 : - 4 1®;;d_ CITY OF 11G J.M.D. Architecture OREGON • 357 Chestnut Ave. #41 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Walgreen's at Pacific & Gaarde Site Plan Review 13935 SW Pacific Hwy PC#: 9 -78c SIT #: 99 -00063 I have reviewed your December 1, 1999 response to my plan review letter of October 5, 1999. There remain some issues needing resolve. SITE RK 1. Item #7 from the previous review - Tax lot consolidation is not adequate to remove , the underlying land division. Provide as originally requested. 210;4-- r . I ACCESSIBILITY t17)) 1. Item #1 from the previous review.- Sheet C -3 shows a grade change at the south accessible route from sidewalk to finish grade of the parking of between 22 and 24 inches. A \ ° A. The length of the ramp shown does not provide for a 1 in 20 slope. Provide ilti � ' 2 . � to revised drawing and details as requested. Item #2 from the previous review- If the northeast route is meant to be an accessible oute then provide detectable warnings at both entrances to the traffic area. This is a change to the original submittal. 3. Item #3 from the previous review - Provide the correct detail 10 as requested. In conclusion, provide three complete sets of site plans, Sheet C -1 through A1.1 as requested. I have enclosed additional comments from the other departments. Sincerely, Jim Funk PLANS EXAMINER • LlbldglpnnsysUM99063adoe 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 „Ai December 3, 1999 CITY OF TIGAR OREGON PBS Environmental 1220 SW Morrison St, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97205 PERMIT NO: SIT 99 -00063 OWNER: Pacific/Gaarde Partners L.P. PROJECT ADDRESS: 13979 SW Pacific Hwy. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Walgreen's TYPES OF SPECIAL INSPECTION: FillGrading The owner has notified us that he /she will retain your services to perform Special Inspections in accordance with the provisions of the State Building Code, permit documents, and special inspection requirements. The owner or the owners agent must also confirm with you that they have authorized you to do the special inspection work. As the regulatory agency, the City requires that you do the following: 1. Submit copies of all inspection reports promptly to the Building Division, architect, engineer, and the contractor. 2. Maintain one copy of each field report at the job site. 3. Submit a final report at the completion of each category of work that you inspect. (See U.B.C. 3318 for soils special inspection final report requirements). If you fail to comply with the above requirements, there may be cause for the City to revoke your authority as special inspector for this job. Should you have any questions, please call the Building Division at (503) 639 -4171. Sincerely, Jim Funk Senior Plans Examiner Enclosure t:biskemptate% notify.dot 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 51r19e'9- ao 9 ProjectDesign Consultants P L A N N I N G E N G I N E E R I N G S U R V E Y I N G 23 Years of Excellence, 1976 -1999 DATE: December 1, 1999 FILE: 1487.20 TO: Brian Rager, City of Tigard FROM: Richard H. Graue SUBJECT: Walgreens — SW Pacific Hwy & Gaarde St. Project Attached are the Water Quality Calculations we prepared to determine the size of the Low Flow Orifice in the Flow Control Manhole for the above referenced project. We used the Unified Sewage Agency criteria for the design storm, which is an event producing 0.36 inches of rainfall within a 4 -hour duration. The return period for this storm is 96 hours. The impervious area calculation was determined as 90% of the total site area., The results of the calculations show the design discharge of 0.14 cfs will flow through a 2.7 -inch diameter orifice with a head of 6 inches. Please call me at (503) 296 -6100 if you have any questions or need further information. • MEM/xxxxxxxx.DOC 1750 Portland 503 - 296 -6100 r. Recycled SW Skyline Blvd. Oregon Fax 296 -6200 '� Paper Suite 229 97221 WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS JOB NUMBER: 1487.20 PROJECT: WALGREENS - PACIFIC HWY. & GAARDE ST., TIGARD, OR FILE: T\:Engr \1487 \1487Hydro.xls REFERENCES: 1. Unified Sewer Agency Design & Construction Standards Manual W.Q. DISCHARGE CALCULATIONS DESIGN STORM: Precipitation: 0.36 inches Storm Duration: 4 hours Storm Return Period: 96 hours Storm Window: 2 weeks IMPERVIOUS AREA: Watershed Area: 1.74 acres Percent imp: 90 % Impervious Area: 1.57 acres Design Discharge = (1.57 ac) *(43560 ft^2 /ac) *(0.36 in / 4.0 hrs) = I 0.14 cfs LOW FLOW ORIFICE CALCULATIONS Q = C 2gh Q= 0.14 cfs (Design Discharge form above) A = Cross sectional area of orifice C = orifice coefficient = 0.62 g = gravity (32.2 ft/sec h = average hydraulic head = 6 inches below high flow A= Q C 2gh A = 0.04 ft A = r = 0.11 ft. radius d =2r d = 2.70 in. diameter, use 213/16 " orifice ; 1487Hydo.xls\ WQ CALCS. 09/20/1999 12:33 PM --■1111--z-MEt \ SCALE : 1" = 60' Ibr‘ \ U -. int iP 4 ,.. -- � » „ I,�i� � 1 27 Ac. �1 � � C/ :; li „ 95) A fir. \ / 0.32 Ac. 1� itil II 515115._ � . N ` N. \ a - � ntl �l�T Itl' SS1iq�C7R ll�C9�M4F`�:�_ff!�t_ 7°`ML"':�'�.. � , \ 5 inrigigWr+awRftitKg old "ccmaQS igiAl " a�mia�Y ,-, to .V g 6til r " AIN 1�1l1 / _ /� i j SU gt�Yi „D „ BRS -■ »^„ Pal / 0 16 EC I I 0.66 Ac. ;5I . ME 1.42 'C. 1 i....: Li! p J 1 , N. • , » RBI �� LiE: ' 0 07 Ac. ~ 1 n I i Q I i so . 413 T 8 _Los as MM. g c l V Lri X0.66 'c i �_& 2,„ b to - I I N F. Nr# 1 o O y 1 I !_ N e I I j .ti I I, W F \ \ ff �� r) n / Q I 1� "G JL\ARD r r' HX F I 1 I i F I P t Project Design Consultants • WATERSHED MAP SHEET 1 OF 1 T: \ENGR \1487 \1487Shed.dwg 11/30/1999 14:16 FAX 1 780 729 2451 JMD Architecture 444 DICK GRADE II 10 $ent.byt 1 1; 11/29/09 9:3AAM;, #707; Page 8/10 CITY OF TIGARD A Program1 for Inspection Semaces and/0r Mamie! Testing Data .7 ,mss Oily of fib: Plan Ck No_ 9 -1 !e Bap No. -- Sit No. /49 0 - o oo g 3 Povjeszt Tiles T.e fr •4# Address if 1P? / ar. 9 c Architect of heeord bra f D J Lk ? d'% l h. tile. 2.2.1 sddre°' z . 0 3 raw. � .nc l 9 •i Bruins* Engineer of Record: �i r Pb. raj — i • s ¢ 6I of addre5: 17 4`"� V 1 ��y L 1 �� r� ,1 Z GTathoiol tagisteer of ascot* vl.ern nien4*) 7k Pa fv13 - 1 wJp - f 9 ;1 addrsss: 117. • 1.... Asir osier . r . . jr_ aQlr tbefeasoarg iOrneedoefer tkr des Izmir shoos to pwil• aremo. awata mdVer Tearing Agony: __ pp, 503 4".11 � L�1 • i q i� address It u a a2- *i• rii ii uKG1� G u 149E 4 0 posal4h+tP oil 1 $4 Z 3 Ge - Technical Agency: P iis$4 iit? ' 1. lam.6m 3r Pex. - Z 4% - O j, e ►7►'Z O G J t�►o ddL s t o ty (1 s w vi e D o >? Fowl L".10 di 7 zers The owner ed m that the above noted Agency has been employed to conduct the special inspections or observations required hernia °Hob 724 '&41► .ram flame No. bale , IXQUalrf vimp pbcriii G f &MOP 1C IPA Into p . comuRvEime adigoring is a lie of *mist iftivealub ad/or eat reraiirial by the 1996 Oregon Stnuttrai Specialty Code and 'Pg d s Meeitaepid Code 14.06.010 through 14.06.040. 7bs s p e • a i awe a a i V e r sow s w a n .egeieed *Sig ao be peneblid by Os Testing AVM. StraCrioa1 Eats= at GoaTt ainocal regime: of 'Wald am as Mons: • Sisced isigeassw for *a Testing AWL" ebell be guarded, to the saidaesiea or ihr SWAM radial% Sir imepeboas at die peedooior won orconernazion at epesatio.s. 1 • s i ilafteclita stall bra de nark roam t o fix wefirmance wtlb Ore issignseol glans anti iga r- -- ra eA tee mina are i twain T =4 e final Idgasd Ripon in accordance with MSC. &dsion 1700 is the wades oedat. • 600/60011 WW1, A0 .LL13 4814. ,6s CO D1;h 1Y'86 she /clio3 S : 30bd Les2tree06 :01 LOU WOO nos :ROWS 6661 02:60 LE/01 CITY OF TIGARD A Program for Inspection Services and/or Material Testing Date: /O / G ,19j City of Tigard: Plan Ck. No. 9 —? (P< Bup No. Sit No. /9 s — O v 6 3 Project Title:' l r.■ Address _ 1 1 "3 9 p U ar e/ A c , Architect of Record .TO r b / -- k S c'\ Ph. LI I S" - 2-27 7 — 2-z I address: 5 747,..a)6 '_ ...1'x,1 I`-_ -2.__u 3 -C A-10 Fren,tcrT Pa, Structural Engineer of Record: d1 L 6r I.. u P Ph. 51°3-- 2 9 6 —G /0e/ address: l7 S' ' S y/ _et- L i' 1 sd r,.., 2 Geo- Technical Engineer of Record: fig v wee) J?le Ph. Tv 3 2. v d° - /9 ?I address: 12-2.0 tt..,.. 7, $r lev 4 ,./ Provide the following information for the testing agency chosen to provide inspection services and/or testing. Testing Agency: Ph. Fax. address Geo- Technical Agency: Ph. Fax. address The owner certifies that the above noted Agency has been employed to conduct the special inspections or observations required herein. Signature of Owner Phone No. Date Print name Company name The following is a list of special inspection and/or services required by the 1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code and Tigard's Municipal Code 14.06.010 through 14.06.040. The special inspections and/or testing services required for this project to be provided by the Testing Agency, Structural Engineer or Geo - Technical Engineer of Record are as follows: • Special Inspectors for the Testing Agency shall be qualified, to the satisfaction of the Building Official, for inspections of the particular type of construction or operation. • Special inspectors shall observe the work assigned herein for conformance with the approved plans and specifications and, submit copies of all inspection reports and, a final signed report in accordance with OSSC, Section 1701.3 to the building official. Category Description of Services r Rte"' P`ovided B 1. Footings adjacent to slopes steeper than 33 -1/3 % OSSC, Section 1806.4 a. Confirm building footings are properly set back from descending slope b. 2. Grading OSSC, Section 3309 a. Regular grading [less than 5,000 cu. yds. but considered unusual] • • Requirements for engineered grading apply. • b. Engineered grading [exceeds 5,000 cu. yds.] Submit: 1. Geo-technical engineers report and, 2. a engineering geology report. 3. an as -built grading plan and, 4. a final report prepared by the soils engineer and, 5. the final report prepared by the geologist. C. 3. Fills OSSC, Section 3313 a. Preparation of ground. for fill on slopes exceeding 1 to 5 (20 %) Includes benching and proper termination at the toe of the slope b. Acceptance of fill materials C. Compaction of fill material to minimum 90% of maximum density. • 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 [503] 639 -4172 FAX [503] 684 -7297 • I:\B LDG1SPLIN S P I .DOC SITE PLAN REVIEW !►; �tl -•I i CITY OF TIGARD COMM ENTS Community Development shaping A Better Community Date: /o -7-77 Staff Person Commenting: /I'9 i4 owL Department: 094x1 Phone Number /Extension: 639- /7/ X yo 7 Project Name: tA41)reens /? / C Site Permit No.: c�JJ / Land Use Case File Nolsl.: S''R /999- 0000 y The Proposed Plans Submitted For Site Permit Have Been Review ed By Our Department And We Have The Following Comments: El PLANS ARE APPROVED. All land use conditions related to this department have been satisfactorily met. PLANS ARE GENERALLY CONSISTENT with the land use approval, HOWEVER, THERE ARE STILL LAND USE CONDITIONS THAT MUST BE MET PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE SITE AND /OR BUILDING PERMITS, OR PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION. Specifically, / / / / / //J/I/ I r€celud / ''� 'aw, 4�i ;'G q/}� Gig/ 41 no/ AC ,prl G Or74/ > ✓ evi les/ � (pifin // ��qIf / / 7 /9%44 i (/ if ,77)7 /"iZi l /re Oi7Le /e I�s 11�✓ jS Go p /Se, ❑ PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT with the land use approval AND MUST BE REVISED. Specifically, NOTE IF THE PERMIT APPLICANT HAS ANY QUESTIONS WITH REGARD TO THE COMMENTS ABOVE, THEY MUST CONTACT THE STAFF PERSON SPECIFIED AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE. h:\pattylmasters\siteplan.mst SITE PLAN REVIEW • COMMENTS O F T1G CrtY OIOARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community Date: ID/ /95 Stall Person Commenting: it/pee /4 Department Rakic, Phone Number /Extension: x195 Project Name: L.14( -lzcLE S Site Permit No Land Use Case File Nofsl_ THE PROPOSED PLANS: SUBMITTED FOR A SITE PERMIT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY OUR DEPARTMENT AND WE HAVE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ❑ Plans are approved. All land use conditions related to this department have been satisfactorily met. 17 Plans are generally consistent with the land use approval, but there are still land use conditions that must be met prior to release of the site and/or building permit, or prior to a final building inspection. Specifically, NNE. [o" t/i&F. /S PU61-/C T T? E r GJA ;en_ D/ 1/isse>iv 48 l fi .1 Oi1JOrL i 7 li)o .- k•AJct oN 6_)A7 1. S i/STEhP. r / fu- toA7&r . /°‘ [ b, To LOU/Lk-JP.) O lva ! I✓J, FCC /3 /tier 34iiii) ) "-I re iy . .APP ; T.//1-T 61asSrAvci /24E . /Ya2.4'✓T Al4 y ,!6" 151 &o:1F r ,/3.4 Dc , /; 4'G',.rrr yr �«�.�e-/tr g74.v0A-tio J7 2/ L 71/6t MLE 41e/377 14.41T7Fi2- T T/ - /rE . �/,ic r 770-r 77/c Se - un- -4MT ,W rrz- ;sE LiSE7 ❑ Plans are NOT consistent with the land use approval and must be revised. Specifically, /id lcx4770A/ , VQ 7714:6 1277/ ,oivE t /FxT E/v?n/f_vcE 994 A- AV/ /atu M o F Dow3r� (', nP-1/4r_vE' Ate/ o T.at 12011.4. ric- 4".1.0 4/1 77 OA./ , ❑ Revised plans are approved. NOTE: IF THE PERMIT APPLICANT HAS ANY QUESTIONS WITH REGARD TO THE COMMENTS ABOVE, THEY MUST CONTACT THE STAFF PERSON SPECIFIED AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE. i:brianrlmasterslsiteplan frm SITE PLAN REVIEW t ° IYI j A ; CITY OF TIOARD COMMENTS Community Development Shaping A Better Community Date: (o-? - 9p Staff Person Commenting: j fi Q/u!_ Department: gpirf/' Phone Number /Extension: 639 - 7/ X yo 7 Project Name: (/09/) T�ee/t5 geirrrl9� y Site Permit Noe / Land Use Case File No(s).: Sb /97 0000 y The Proposed Plans Submitted For A Site Permit Have Been Reviewed By Our Department And We Have The Following Comments: ❑ PLANS ARE APPROVED. All land use conditions related to this department have been satisfactorily met. PLANS ARE GENERALLY CONSISTENT with the land use approval, HOWEVER, THERE ARE STILL LAND USE CONDITIONS THAT MUST BE MET PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE SITE AND /OR BUILDING PERMITS, OR PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION. Specifically, / /� /kW /7� (eCe,i/ci /M ,-ram., 4p�. �o Oil LA At r /107 A47 iv/ ✓cve/ c i.. i - K0p7 Ion /a_ / ' Sf'� � / /lo. -a ia� /4ig4 f T/y1 ./J � � ,- r� r f(/ /e o /2Ze /2 t4 e ' ❑ PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT with the land use approval AND MUST BE REVISED. Specifically, NOTE: IF THE PERMIT APPLICANT HAS ANY QUESTIONS WITH REGARD TO THE COMMENTS ABOVE, THEY MUST CONTACT THE STAFF PERSON SPECIFIED AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE. h:\pattyMnasters\siteplan.mst SITE PLAN REVIEW ri\ `* di 1 r )17 44,,, COMMENTS CITY OF TIOARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community Date: lb (1 [VI Staff Person Commenting: `gam Department a.— Phone Number /Extension: x 2-,\ e7 Project Name: VIALGrzEG,t s Ptt tA�--( Site Permit No Si T 1 GRct — o1/4)dk '5 Land Use Case File Nota: S DI_ i ai■ - obnl THE PROPOSED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR A SITE PERMIT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY OUR DEPARTMENT AND WE HAVE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ❑ Plans are approved. All land use conditions related to this department have been satisfactorily met. V Plans are generally consistent with the land use approval, but there are still land use conditions that must be met prior to release of the site and /or building permit, or prior to a final building inspection. Specifically, • S"M'1' eirc t I.ir Prem a �Kl? • �PaTo,„j, ODo-r APPfz P &- r - \J &% _ 1N ( "LI.1/J o 5 (cLM (ui_ HA-1- tJ33 •.i sa•M n - ter -ro R . 1--kG%-4 FOJJ r tPAS�i T�ikit, tS SricvJ J a►,! P J tk/hhc.t-1 1. Cli-,1, mewl-, Try se.. -(�;� e_.4,-c "Co Vra-t v,f brZl F fl,c. �12� W Ft-.. vJ C_oI_L RI-- MAUI -to: ❑ Plans are NOT consistent with the land use approval and must be revised. Specifically, ❑ Revised plans are approved. NOTE: IF THE PERMIT APPLICANT HAS ANY QUESTIONS WITH REGARD TO THE COMMENTS ABOVE, THEY MUST CONTACT THE STAFF PERSON SPECIFIED AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE. i:tbrianr\masterstsiteplan.frm SITE PLAN REVIEW 4 ' Au- 1E COMMENTS CITY OF nOARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community Date: 1of 6 /99 Stall Person Commenting: Mid M/.44:v____ Department: 211.614c, L.4a — 1J,Q - ,�. Phone Number /Extension: x S rS' • Project Name: W A eEEKSS Site Permit No Land Use Case Fie Nofsl: THE PROP:OSED: PLANS :S.IJBMITTED FOR A SITE PERMIT HA VE BEEN REV BY ° OUR DEPARTMENT AND WE HAVE THE FOLLOWINGC:OMMENTS: ❑ Plans are approved. All land use conditions related to this department have been satisfactorily met. 9 Plans are generally consistent with the land use approval, but there are still land use conditions that must be met prior to release of the site and/or building permit, or prior to a final building inspection. Specifically, ei/6vi nr /,1,a rra, S- TAT,O, n..n Al f) /2ET, it- ,4 6" ,i,eE LiAJE , lei' Uhv E /3 Ru &L./c_ T 7ZZ & Doc t ,"F - rv>71 6 . /Ulu rT /kler'Fv L.1J ;trL_ 17»051;Av 4 1e 1 e2ieft-- T l'i)on-.k..oce 0..-d &A TEA.- vyS7E . / .'r PA' /•1 -L4- CJAT &?_ . s 11,4 To ,tt_k,..) _ a- wit T (t, • r' / I7. • - ie., A e • //,'.»j oni , 'Ca4/v) . ", 2. 3 4 2E .. i , T ✓: .• _ re _..: o .0. • ^ A-c2 _ ewT T - rieg grTE. 6 7u4 it TZ * — 77/45 go7. -7-41. r sr Oteror. - j ItsEo Ae% , ❑ Plans are NOT consistent with the land use approval . and must be revised. Specifically, // icx4TloJ/ 4 vd 7. OT.h'' aivE A /FXT 75 EAJ77z vcE /764,I. 99A) 9 _ :.T/ :s -- A . tvn/ .0l)44 6577c A 2D!? i _ ,_•G{f , A /-- Al/Atmlaivi , C DA 461-€ ( t- f/4 - LA/E F/,?4y' Lam/ 2Y D79/14,7 4iJQ /4 Tee"J ❑ Revised plans are approved. MOTE: IF THE PERMIT APPLICANT HAS ANY QUESTIONS WITH REGARD TO THE COMMENTS ABOVE, THEY MUST CONTACT THE STAFF PERSON SPECIFIED AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE i:lbria nrVnasters\siteptan.frm Jim Funk - Walgreens Site plan review _ Page 1 From: Jim Funk To: Hajduk, Julia; Miller, Mike; Rager, Brian; Scheidegger, Matt Date: 10/5/99 11:18AM Subject: Walgreens Site plan review The site plans have been reviewed and a letter is ready to be sent. Come by and do your thing before Friday 10/8/99 • JimF JimF @ci.tigard.or.us • • • " 417 .( ( 3 SITE PLAN REVIEW YO �� G COMMENTS CRY of noaao Community Development Shaping A Better Community Date: 12 1 3 1 0 6. Staff Person Commenting: MiK6 M�u.E2 Department: Amue, armies — 7 Phone Number /Extension: x 3gS Project Name: Ll A L-cdt s Site Permit No: 000(03 Land Use Case File Nots : THE PROPOSED :EPLANS SUBMITTED FOR A SITE PERMIT HAVEBEEN REVIEWED BY OUR DEPARTMENT AND WE HAVE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ❑ Plans are approved. All land use conditions related to this department have been satisfactorily met. E Plans are generally consistent with the land use approval, but there are still land use conditions that must be met prior to release of the site and /or building permit, or prior to a final building inspection. Specifically, © A/E ,o /Nct - i4oE Sra,vo4/2,) 1,1 7 DEr --/`g Domes M6:7E4 -- c..((c,c. A/EE' 7 13E Ivinvro f344t.k. 5F.l,MJdvn AD,' A-w mErgLs S 4 15g Loc 4-/El iAi L_,,oivo S 6,4 P, • 1'T Lt MA /%JoT i , •GC.O -I A' • , 4n.1 _i/VA TCOtu �F PC[ sr,,.x , 11'14,N (12 /Ate,60', . ❑ Plans are NOT consistent with the land use approval and must be revised. Specifically, ❑ Revised plans are approved. NOTE: IF THE PERMIT APPLICANT HAS ANY QUESTIONS WITH REGARD TO THE COMMENTS ABOVE, THEY MUST CONTACT THE STAFF PERSON SPECIFIED AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE. i:\brianrlmasters\siteplan.frm A.2/02/1999 16:13 FAX 1 760 729 2451 JMD Architecture R104 DEC -02 •09 02 :43PM FROM - WASHINGTON COUNTY 503-881-3900 T -406 P.03 /011 F-O87 V I L L AGE P R O P E R T I E S RECEIVED AUG 1 0 iyyy WASHINGTON COUNTY per.of ESSMENT &TAXATION August 4, 999 Department of Assessment and Taxation Cartography & Records Division 1555 N. Fi nt Ave. State 130 Mail Stop 4 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 -3087 Re: Tax Lot Consolidation Account Numbers 2S 13DD-01100 anc 2S 13DD -01000 We are in the process of developing a single tenant development over the two tax lots indicated above_ We would like CO have the two lots consolidated. Enclosed is the completed consolidation request form. Please let me know should you need any additional information to process this request. Thank you for your attention to this matter. • Sincerely. Alisa M. Carver Title Coordinator 562 K14S10M - UItF 201 - sAN Fpdd:i ;G 9, sR 94166 415.51'4.1)7z Pal 115.5i6.0561 ��- • October 5, 1999 :k CITY OF TIG Joe Dickson OREGON 562 Mission St, Suite 203 San Francisco, CA 94105 RE: Walgreens Site Plan Review 13939 SW Pacific Hwy PC #: 9 -78c SIT #: 99 -00063 Submittal documents for the above referenced project have been reviewed for conformance with the applicable 1998 Oregon Specialty Codes and other applicable codes and standards. The following comments are noted: � 1 (SITE WORK \ 1. Provide the total cubic yards of each of the following: A. . Excavation B. Fill [structural and non - structural] Complete the enclosed Soils Special Inspection form designating an Approved Testing Laboratory [Line B] and signed by the owner of the project [Line D]. A. The completed form must be returned to this office before a Site permit can be issued. B. Copies of all special inspection reports shall be filed with this office continually during construction [OSSC, Appendix Section 3305]. C. A final signed report must be on file before an occupancy certificate will be issued [OSSC, Appendix Section 3318]. 3. In addition to Building Department plan review comments, you will find a copy of comments from one or all of the following departments: Engineering, Water, and Planning, referencing deficiencies in that departments requirements for your site. k If you have questions regarding their comments, please call or respond to them personally. All corrections, including those from the building department shall be incorporated in your revised plans. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 • Walgreens Site Plan Review PC #: 9 -78c BUP #: 99 -00063 Page #2 A site permit will not be issued until all corrections have been made and approved by the respective department, therefor it is paramount that you reply expeditiously. *-- 4. Contact Mike Miller, Tigard Water Department, at 639 -4171 ext.395 for placement of the concrete vault. �. Submit revised plan sheet C-4 specifying a catch basin, NOT area drains, for the west and east parking lot. • 6. Submit revised plan sheet C -6 providing the catch basin design and specification required by the Plumbing Specialty Code, Section 1108.0. There shall be no underlying land division to the site. Provide a new recorded legal description describing the current two parcels as one parcel. 1 ACCESSIBILITY 0 The accessible route incorporates a ramp exceeding a 1 -20 slope. Submit plans 1, 01/ showing the design and specifications for: A. Handrails on both sides in accordance with the Oregon Structural as Specialty Code, Section 1109.7.6 and 1109.7.7(4). •" B. The overall rise exceeds 30 inches. Provide an intermediate landing in / „i • accordance with Section 1109.7.5. y 2. Is the east route to the public way intended to be an accessible route? A. The revised drawings shall show details and specifications for handrails Cam' as required by Section 1003.3,6 made accessible in accordance with Section 1109.8. Correct Detail 10, Sheet A0.3 to read $300.00 fine. FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY No building shall be constructed, altered, enlarged, moved or repaired in a manner that by reason of size, type of construction, number of stories, occupancy, or any combination thereof, creates a need for a fire flow in excess of 3,000 gallons per minute at 20 psi residual or exceeds the available fire flow at the site of the structure [UFC, Section 903.3]. A. Provide Fire Flow Testing pursuant to NFPA 291 using the enclosed "Hydrant Flow Test Report Form." B. Complete the enclosed "Fire Flow Work Sheet" and return a copy to the City of Tigard, attn. Plans Examiner. Note! These documents shall be on file before a building permit will be issued. , • - ' ' . Walgreens . Site Plan Review PC #: 9 -78c BUP #: 99 -0006 Pa #3 . COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire proteption s stems. There shall not be less than one (1) fire hydrant for the first ,500 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1) additional fire ' nt for each 1,500 GPM or portion thereof over 1,500 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by. the building official. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) / COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the buidling and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) I. FIRE HYDRANT /FIRE DEPARTMENT'CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire, apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5) FDC locations shll be approved by the building official. (1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Sec. 904.1.1) Please submit three copies of revised submittal documents and a letter indicating your response to the above comments for review. Please call me at (503) 639 -4171 if you have any questions. Sincer Jim Funk PLANS EXAMINER Bbsys‘s.doe • September 30, 1999 CITY OF . TIGA RD OREGON Brandy Yamamoto JMD Architecture 357 Chestnut #41 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Plans Check Number 9 -78C This letter is to confirm receipt of your building plans which have been routed to the plans examiner. As a reminder, the associated land use case(s) is /are: SDR1999 -00009 Please be aware you are responsible for satisfying the conditions of the land use case(s) and must submit plans directly to the appropriate staff person(s) indicated on your final order. • Your building plans are not routed to the planning or engineering departments; you must satisfy the land use permit conditions independent of the building permit plans review process. After the building plans review process has been completed, your building permit will not be issued without approval from the engineering and planning departments. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please feel free to telephone me and I will be happy to explain further. Bonnie Mulheam Development Services Technician cc: Building file cc: Planning Department cc: Engineering Department • I:\DSTS\BUPLUC.DOT 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772