Loading...
Correspondence (570) aaga7a'e'7- uv y y cv // 9IP Z 541 C4.6 c 164 Dan Nelson From: Craig Hams [craigh@aaieng.com] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 5:21 PM To: Dan Nelson Subject: RE: America's tire Dan, For item 2 on the building permit the architect has given me the following statement.... "We will be installing an ESFR sprinkler system which is an early response fire suppression system. In Sec 910 OSSC, we are not required to install smoke vent hatch. So, this comment should not apply to this project." Do you need anything additional or will this meet item 2 requirements? I believe we are done with the structural requirements. So that should take care of all the items on the Building permit (BUP2007- 00448). On the site permit we still have the following outstanding issues — Item 2. Show 90 deg turn... Item 4. We are getting a new flow test from TVFR (should have tomorrow or Monday) Item 5. We are using an ESFR sprinkler system with an 8" supply line. The supply line is a requirement of Americas Tire. Will this meet this requirement? Thanks for your help on this permit. Regards, Craig Harris, PE Principal AAI Engineering 503.352.7678 I dir 503.620.3030 I tel 503.620.5539 I fax craioh @aaiena.com www.aaiena.com 4875 SW Griffith Drive I Suite 300 I Beaverton, OR 1 97005 From: Dan Nelson [mailto:DanN @tigard -or.gov] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 7:39 AM To: Craig Hams Subject: RE: America's tire Craig Heres Millers latest review. Dan Nelson From: Craig Harris [mailto:craigh @aaieng.com] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 4:39 PM 1 City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 December 19, 2007 RE: NEW 8817 SQ FT BUILDING FOR DISCOUNT TIRE Proiect Information TIGARD Building Permit: BUP2007 -00448 Occupancy B /S -1 Tenant Name: Discount Tire Type of Construction: 5 -B Address: 11462 SW Pacific Hwy. Occupant Load: 73 Area: 8,817 Sq. Ft. Stories: 1 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 2007 edition; and the State of Oregon Fire Code (OFC) 2007 edition. 1) All construction shall be inspected prior to covering. 2) Make approved set of plans available for all inspections. 3) All deferred submittals and shop drawings shall be submitted to the Building Department for approval prior to installation of said items. FIRE LIFE AND SAFETY / GENERAL The main exterior door or doors are permitted to be equipped with key - operated locking devices from the egress side provided: 1. The locking device is readily distinguishable as locked, 2. A readily visible durable sign is posted on the egress side on or adjacent to the door stating: THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. The sign shall be in letters 1 inch (25 mm) high on a contrasting background. (Sec. 1008.1.8.3) All exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. (Sec. 1008.1.8) Exits and exit access doors shall be marked by an approved exit sign readily visible from any direction of egress travel. Access to exits shall be marked by readily visible exit signs in cases where the exit or the path of egress travel is not immediately visible to the occupants. (Sec. 1011.1) Exit signs shall be illuminated at all times and shall be provided with a second source of power that will provide 1 '/s hours of illumination in case of primary power loss. (Sec. 1006.3) FYI Additional exit signs may be required by the city field inspector to clearly indicate the path of egress. The means of egress shall be provided with illumination of not less than 1 foot candle at the floor level anytime the building is occupied. The means of egress illumination shall be provided with a second source of power in case of primary power loss. (Sec. 1006.2) Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in new and existing Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R -1, R -2, R-4, and S occupancies. (OFC Sec. 906) Live Loads Posted: The live loads for which each floor has been designed to exceed 50 psf shall be conspicuously posted by the owner in that part of each story in which Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 , • www.tigard - or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 , they apply, using durable metal signs, and it shall be unlawful to remove or deface such notices. The occupant of the building shall be responsible for keeping the actual load below the allowable limits. (1603.3 OSSC) '', American with Disabilities Act (ADA): It shall be the responsibility of the Architect, Engineer, Designer, Contractor, Owner and Lessee to research the applicability of the ADA requirements for the structure. The City of Tigard reviews the plans and inspects the structure only for compliance with Chapter 11 of the OSSC, which may not include all of the requirements of the ADA. Approved Plans: 1 set of approved plans, bearing the City of Tigard approval stamp, shall be maintained on the jobsite. The plans shall be available to the Building Division inspectors throughout all phases of construction. (106.3.1 OSSC) Certificate of Occupancy: No building or structure shall be used or occupied until the Building Official has issued a certificate of occupancy (109.1 OSSC) Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided for all new buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. When submitting revised,drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respectful , itr an Nelson, Senior Plans Examiner (503)718 -2436 dann @tigard - or.gov ( .7 • City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 -.r December 20, 2007 II . I. . RE: ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT T I GARD Proiect.Information Project Name: Discount Tire Construction Type: 5 -B Building Permit: BUP2007 -00448 Occupancy Type: M /S -1 Address: 11462 SW Pacific Hwy. Occupant Load: 73 Craig Harris, The Building Division has completed the review of the project listed above. The project has not been released by either the Planning Division or the Engineering Division at the time of this letter, so the Building Permit cannot be issued. If you have questions please contact Maris Buxton a0 503 - 718 - 2453. The date of this letter begins the 180 day time limitation in accordance with Section 105.3.2 of the. State of Oregon, Structural Specialty Code, 2007 edition. If the permit has not been issued within the time limitations referenced in section 105.3.2, the work shall be considered abandoned and the plans will be expired. Respectfully, t iI ��1f Dan Nelson, Senior Plans Examiner (503)718 -2436 dann @tigard -or.gov Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard- or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 September 20, 2007 If • RE: DISCOUNT TIRE Project Information T I GARD Building Permit: BUP2007 -00448 Occupancy M /S -1 Tenant Name: Discount Tire Type of Construction: 5B Address: 11462 SW Pacific Hwy. Occupant Load: 73 Area: 8817 Sq. Ft. Stories: 1 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 2007 edition; and the State of Oregon Fire Code (OFC) 2007 edition. The following conditions shall be submitted to The Tigard Building Department prior to issuance of this permit. 1) Please provide all conditions required from the Miller Engineering Structural Plan Review. 2) Please document compliance with Sec. 910" OSSC. 3) Please apply for Site Utilities Plumb Permit. 4) Provide drawings for grid ceiling installation complying with ASCE 7. 5) Electrical plan,review will be required for this project: 6) Provide Planning and Engineering approval for permit issuance. Certificate of Occupancy: No building or structure shall be used or occupied until the Building Official has issued a certificate of occupancy 109.1 OSSC Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided for all new buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. • When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respectful , war' 4 ,,,, an Nel on, Senior Plans Examiner • Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard- or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 Dan Nelson From: Craig Hams [craigh a©aaieng.com] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 5:21 PM To: Dan Nelson Subject: RE: America's tire Dan, For item 2 on the building permit the architect has given me the following statement.... "We will be installing an ESFR sprinkler system which is an early response fire suppression system. In Sec 910 OSSC, we are not required to install smoke vent hatch. So, this comment should not apply to this project." Do you need anything additional or will this meet item 2 requirements? I believe we are done with the structural requirements. So that should take care of all the items on the Building permit (BUP2007- 00448). On the site permit we still have the following outstanding issues — Item 2. Show 90 deg turn... Item 4. We are getting a new flow test from TVFR (should have tomorrow or Monday) Item 5. We are using an ESFR sprinkler system with an 8" supply line. The supply line is a requirement of Americas Tire. Will this meet this requirement? Thanks for your help on this permit. Regards, Craig Harris, PE Principal AAI Engineering 503.352.7678 I dir 503.620.3030 I tel 503.620.5539 I fax craigh( aaienq.com www.aaiena.com 4875 SW Griffith Drive I Suite 300 I Beaverton, OR 1 97005 From: Dan Nelson [mailto:DanN@tigard- or.gov] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 7:39 AM To: Craig Hams Subject: RE: America's tire Craig Heres Millers latest review. Dan Nelson From: Craig Harris [mailto:craigh @aaieng.com] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 4:39 PM 1 A � Dan Nelson From: Craig Hams [craigh@aaieng.com] Sent: Friday, December 14, 200710:09 AM To: Dan Nelson; Kim McMillan Subject: ATC - Tigard Dan /Kim, As you might or might not know my client also owns the property to the west of our site. We would like to use this property for a lay down and storage area during construction only. Do we need any additional permits as long as we install the proper erosion control devices? We have already submitted a 1200c application so the additional area would not be an issue of going over an acre. Thanks for your help. Happy Friday! Regards, Craig Harris, PE Principal AM Engineering 503.352.7678 I dir 503.620.3030 I tel 503.620.5539 I fax craiah @aaiena.com www.aaiena.com 4875 SW Griffith Drive I Suite 300 I Beaverton, OR 1 97005 1 afghan associates. inc. ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM • DATE: December 5, 2007 TO: City of Tigard — Dan Nelson • jbP COW8 BY: Hamid R. Afghan City of Tigard Ap• r• ved Plans SUBJECT: Permit Review Response ► �, B �i...- - pate 1.F - PROJECT: America's Tire — Tigard, Oregon (�, , �r, 11462 SW Pacific Highway (/\-ua ) #k c`i'Y Tigard, Oregon 97223 Permit #: BUP 2007 -00448 PROJECT NO.: A07042 OFFICE COPY Below you will find our responses to the plan review comments dated November 6, 2007. Our responses are in the same order as the plan review comments. 4. See added calculations. 5. See revised and added Calculation Sheets L15 and L15A. 6. See revised Calculation Sheet MS8 with new load combinations from ASCE 7 -05. 8. Details 221 and 237 are not used. See Items 15 and 20. 12. Detail 109 as drawn is not to scale and is indicated as such below the detail callout. See revised detail. 15. Detail 221 is not used and it is removed from mezzanine framing plan. See Item 20 for Detail 237. 17. See revised Detail 227. 19. Detail 239 is not used and the detail is crossed out. 20. Detail 237 is not used. This detail should be 216, SIM. See revised Sheet S2.1, mezzanine framing plan between Grid 7 and 8. 21. Retaining wall was initially designed per Geotech Report by MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. dated March 21, 2006 and an email from the engineer (see • attached) regarding the retaining wall parameters. A new soils report has been obtained by the owner from a local firm. The retaining wall design parameter is somewhat different, but as shown in the calculations, the design does not change. See attached Geotech Report by Geotech Solutions. 26. See revised and added calculations (Sheets FD12 and FD12A) and drawing Sheet S2.1. The footing length is changed to 13' -0" from 12' -0 ". 27. See revised and added calculations (Sheets FD13 and FD13A) and drawing Sheet S21. The footing length is changed to 13' -8" from 12' -8 ". No 4' -0" slab weight is included in calculations. 32. See added calculations for wall load transferring to the roof. E:\2007\A07042 \Documents Memo - Plan Review 02.doc 4875 SW Griffith Drive I Suite 300 I Beaverton, OR 1 97005 503.620.3030 I tel 503.620.5539 I fax w w w. a a i e n g. c o m Abdi Afghan • From: Hamid Afghan [hamida @afghaninc.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 8:33 AM To: abdia @aaieng.com; craigh @aaieng.com Subject: FW: ORP- Tigard FYI Hamid R. Afghan, S.E. Principal AAI Engineering 503.620.3030 I tel 503.620.5539 I fax hamida @aaieng.corn www.aaieng.com 4875 SW Griffith Drive I Suite 300 I Beaverton, OR 1 97005 Original Message From: Noel Anasco [mailto:nanasco@thebergman.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:08 PM To: hamida @aaieng.com Cc: dwainwright@discounttireco. corn Subject: FW: ORP- Tigard Hamid, See e -mail below from the Soils Engineer regarding the information requested. Let us know if you need further information. Noel Anasco Project Manager The Bergman Companies 4300 Edison Avenue Chino, CA 91710 Tel: (909) 548 -3401 Fax: (909) 627 -5425 Email: nanasco @thebergman.com Web: www.thebergman.corn Original Message From: Hartig, Mark [mailto:MHARTIG @mactec.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 3:58 PM To: Noel Anasco 1 'Subject: FW: ORP- Tigard Noel - Please see the recommendations below. Let me know if this is sufficient or if you need more information. Thanks Original Message From: Ricky Wang [mailto:RWang @riley- group.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 3:38 PM To: Hartig, Mark Subject: RE: ORP- Tigard Mark, As we discussed, a concrete retaining wall will be needed along north side of the building. The retaining wall will be part of the building wall. Based on the soil information, here are the recommended soil parameters for retaining wall design. Active pressure with slope backfill: 45 pcf Passive pressure: 250 pcf with 1.5 safety factor Earth pressure due to seismic: 5H, H is wall height Backfill material: Granular material Drainage recommendation: 4" perforated pipe with drainage gravel around it and wrapped around with drainage fabric If you need more information, let me know. Ricky Wang, Ph.D., P.E Principal Engineer The Riley Group, Inc. 17522 Bothell Way NE Bothell, WA 98011 Phone: 425- 415 -0551 Fax: 425- 415 -0311 2 ..( ` r, ilk I afghan associates, inc. ENGINEERING C.� � ,. 1 , � OcT 3 � ■. MEMORANDUM �,�v�*,�6oC�� DATE: October 26, 2007 TO: City of Tigard - Dan Nelson BY: Hamid R. Afghan SUBJECT: Permit Review Response PROJECT: America's Tire - Tigard, Oregon 11462 SW Pacific Highway • Tigard, Oregon 97223 Permit #: BUP 2007 -00448 PROJECT NO.: A07042 Below you will find our responses to the plan review comments dated October 1, 2007. Our responses are in the same order as the plan review comments. 1. Calculations are based on 2006 IBC and State of Oregon 2007 Structural Specialty Code. Structural general notes are changed to reflect that. 2. See soils report provided. 3. See added weld to Detail 16. 4. See added Detail 225. 5. See Sheet L15 and added calculations. 6. See additional calculations on Sheet MS8. Calculations are based on the assumption that all the lateral loads are resisted at the cmu wall located at B.9 between Grid 7 and 8. The same drag strut details are used for the cmu wall at Grid B.95 and between Grid 2 and 3. 7. See revised Detail 228. No pilaster is required at this location. 8. See mezzanine framing plan at Grid B.95 and between Grid 2 and 3. Details 221 and 237 are not used. 9. See revised Detail 102. 10. See revised Detail 103 and 104. Horizontal reinforcing is shifted up. 11. See modified Detail 106 and 109 and added notes. 12. See original calculations Sheet FD11 through FD13. . 13. See modified details 201,202, 205, 215 and structural general notes for masonry horizontal reinforcing. See Detail 205 for revised 5" bearing plate. 14. See Item #13 above. 15. Detail 221 is not used. 16. See modified Detail 224 and mezzanine framing plan. This detail is for the steel channel at the masonry wall. 17. Detail 227 bar joist block out is similar to Detail 205. See added Detail 227 at framing plan along Grid 2. 4875 SW Griffith Drive I Suite 300 I Beaverton, OR 1 97005 503.620.3030 I tel 503.620.5539 I fax w w w. a a i e n g. c o m .-( America's Tire October 26, 2007 Memo Page 2 18. Detail 230 is not correct and is deleted. 19. Detail 239 is not used. Detail 242 is the plan view of detail 212. See added note to Detail 212. 20. Detail 237 is not used. 21. See soils report provided. 22. Mezzanine tire rack calculations and details will be provided as deferred submittal. See added note to structural general notes for deferred submittal. 23. Refer to added calculations to Sheets R5 to R9. Member sizes stay the same. 24. See revised calculations Sheets W2 and W3 with 6' -6" width of tributary area above the door opening. 25. See revised and added calculations Sheets L10, FD7, FD7A and L14 for added roof load and modified footing at Grid 2. 26. Wall weight and weight from lintel beams are included in calculations for all footings on Sheets FD11, FD12 and FD13, see added notes to calculations. 27. This footing is 3' -0" wide. The assumption is with 4' -0" wide slab, the footing is okay. 28. The height of the retaining wall varies and subsequently the height of the cmu wall changes. The shorter the retaining wall is, the higher the cmu wall weight becomes as indicated on the calculations Sheets FD15, FD19, and FD22. 29. See modified Sheet L13 and added Sheets L16 and L17. 30. See rewritten calculations reflecting mass and seismic coefficient on sheets L2, L3 and L4. See "shear wall loading at roof" sheets L10, L11 and L12 for calculating "total story shear" Sheets L6 through L9. 31. See attached Sheets L2, L3, L4, L13, L14, L15, L16, L17 and MS8 (chord forces are shown on Sheet L17 and L13 above each diaphragm). 32. See Item #31. 33. See attached tables for compression in angles when the applied load is through one leg. 34. Special inspection will be provided. 35. Structural observation will be performed by AAI. 36. Structural shop drawing will be provided. 37. Stamped roof joists will be provided. 38. See Item #22 above. 39. See revised plans. E:\2007\A07042\Documents \Memo - Plan Review 01 .doc