City Council Minutes - 04/16/2002 Agenda Item No. E I
MINUTES Meeting of_ '5
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING
April 16, 2002
1. WORKSHOP MEETING
1.1 Call to Order - City Council
Mayor Griffith called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m.
1.2 Roll Call: Mayor Griffith; Councilors Dirksen, Patton, and Scheckla
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports: None
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non Agenda Items: None
2. JOINT MEETING WITH CITY COUNCILS OF TIGARD, TUALATIN AND THE
TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD
• Mayor Griffith welcomed all those in attendance.
• Introductions:
Tigard Council —
Mayor Griffith
Councilor Dirksen
Councilor Patton
Councilor Scheckla
Tigard-Tualatin School Board —
AI Hieb — Board Chair
Mark Chism, Board Vice-Chair
Carolyn Neunzert, Board member
Pat Biggs, Board member
Barry Albertson, Board member
Steve Lowder, School Superintendent
Susan Stark Haydon, Community Relations Director
Tualatin City Council --
Lou Ogden, Mayor
Tony Weller, Council President
Helen Cain, Councilor
Bob Boryska, Councilor
Chris Bergstrom,Councilor
Ed Truax, Councilor
Steve Wheeler, City Manager
• Discussion of Topics of Mutual Concern and Interest
a. May/November 2002 Bond Items — Review status.
COUNCIL MINUTES — April 16, 2002 page 1
Steve Lowder, TTSD School Superintendent — distributed information on the
school bond issue in May, which is on file in the City Recorder's office. Dr.
Lowder reviewed key elements of the measure.
Councilor Patton presented an update on the New Library bond measure
(Measure 34-47). She noted she is receiving positive responses about the
proposal, but it will be critical to get 50 percent voter turnout in order to
pass this money measure. Councilor Patton reviewed activities to discuss the
new library with citizens.
Both Dr. Lowder and Councilor Patton noted the importance of both of
these measures for the community. The next issue (May) of Cityscape will
have an information piece on both measures.
b. Results of the Assets Survey — Review the next steps.
Mayor Griffith introduced this agenda item. Information was distributed,
which is on file in the City Recorder's office.
John Morgan from the Washington County Commission on Children and
Families was present and gave a PowerPoint presentation, which is on file in
the City Recorder's office.
The results were discussed as was the need to get information to key staff
members to integrate steps into processes including budgeting. Some
actions, such as an "attitude shift" would not require financial aid.
What is next:
• Confirming what we already know
• Call to understand, affirm, and act
• Pacesetter projects include:
- Tualatin Youth Advisory Committee
- Tigard Mayor's Youth Forum Committee
- Tualatin United Methodist/YWCA/Library Summer Program for
apartment complex
- Little things — Think Kids 8t Assets First!
C. Youth Activities — How to coordinate?
- Mayor Jim Griffith's Youth Forum
Mayor Griffith reviewed the status of the Youth Forum in Tigard. He
said 80 kids are participating in an after-school program and Tigard is
COUNCIL MINUTES — April 16, 2002 page 2
looking forward to expanding to accommodate more participants.
Forum members are attempting to find sponsors to provide food
items.
Tualatin's Youth Council
Mayor Ogden noted the City of Tualatin has made several attempts to
launch a youth program. He asked for advice on how to engage
people to become active on the forum — what makes it work and how
does this translate to an after-school program?
Ms. Stark Haydon responded that the Commission on Children and
Families provided a grant for this after-school program at Twality
Middle School. Tigard staff provide some support to the Tigard
Youth Forum (City Manager Monahan and Assistant to the City
Manager Newton), which got its start, initially, as a program offered
during the school Christmas break one year. Assistant to the City
Manager Newton added that the Youth Forum members did not bring
any preconceived ideas to the table. The Forum membership is
comprised of a variety of community representatives including those
from churches and youth service providers. Ms. Newton referred to a
"white paper" created, soon after the Forum was established, to
identify the challenges and to put all the pieces together.
Skateboard Parks — Tualatin's Success; Tigard's Present Effort
Mayor Griffith noted this item, in the interest of time, would not be
discussed. He said that the City of Tualatin has a successful
skateboard park and Tigard is working on developing a park of its
own.
C. Tri-Met Bus Service — Are there improvements needed to bus routes that would
further our collective efforts?
Mayor Griffith cited the needs Tigard has brought forward to Tri Met for
improvements to Tigard service.
Community Development Hendryx noted staff has been gathering data for
critical populations, corridors that need service, and businesses service needs.
Staff will share this information with Tri Met. Staff is also reviewing the
City's infrastructure to accommodate concerns of Tri Met; i.e., where are
sidewalks needed. Tri Met has been cooperative in conversations with
Tigard.
COUNCIL MINUTES — April 16, 2002 page 3
Mayor Ogden said that Tri Met service for Tualatin basically serves riders
who need to travel to downtown Portland. Tri Met does little for the City of
Tualatin. There is a shuttle service managed by the Chamber of Commerce,
which has lost about $2 5,000 over the last five years. Tri Met does not
service the suburbs even though the issue has been brought up and discussed
several times in recent years. Mayor Ogden said he salutes what Tigard is
doing, but wonders whether Tigard will actually see any results. The Tualatin
business community, per Mayor Ogden, would be the group that may push
for secession from Tri Met.
Mayor Griffith noted the number of jobs in Washington County is as great as
the number in Portland's downtown area.
Mayor Ogden said that he is not being critical of Tri Met, as he has come to
realize that Tri Met must make business (financial) decisions on how to
provide services.
d. The Tualatin-to-Tigard Pedestrian Bridge — What is the outlook for Federal
funding?
Mr. Wheeler noted the last activity regarding the bridge occurred a couple of
months ago when they were told there might be money available for this
project. County officials asked for and obtained information from Tigard
and Tualatin. Nothing has been heard since then. This bridge would be part
of the greenway connection project and it would be good linkage for
Tualatin, Tigard and Durham.
e. School District Property — What is the potential for coordinated use?
Mayor Griffith introduced this item.
- Rider Property — Joint use by Tigard for a water reservoir with play field.
Tigard Public Works Director Wegner said discussions on joint uses of this
property began about two years ago. A preliminary study has been done
and the school district has asked if Tigard would be ready to build when the
school bond passes. Mr. Wegner said the City could be ready by switching
some priorities. The needed construction would take about two years to
complete and the fields would be ready when the school is done.
Avery Property — Potential for Joint Use with City of Tualatin
Dr. Lowder noted there have been preliminary discussions about a joint
venture with the City. Mr. Wheeler said this has been a long-term discussion
and the City is open to joint uses of this property.
COUNCIL MINUTES — April 16, 2002 page 4
Tualatin Councilor Bergstrom asked about the long-term use of the Tualatin
Elementary School. Dr. Lowder said the building would likely be replaced
and the district is exploring other uses at this location, such as the magnet
school. It was noted that this property has historical significance to some
Tualatin residents.
- Other Properties — Potential investment by cities?
Mr. Wheeler said that a facility visioning process is underway in Tualatin and
the city may look to the school district for potential joint use of school
properties.
Mayor Griffith said the Tigard skateboard committee is looking at a Fowler
site as a potential park location.
Dr. Lowder said the old district administration building, near C.F. Tigard
Elementary, would be expensive to refurbish. The school district has not
decided what to do with this property.
f. DARE Programs — Changes planned for the coming school year as the District
complies with grant funding requirements.
Ms. Stark Haydon said the district has a federal grant for $100,000 for
tobacco education. One of the requirements of this grant is to provide a
fifth grade curriculum that is an "approved program" and DARE is not
"approved." The district needs to find an accepted program. Currently the
district is looking at how to make it work with DARE and another
curriculum.
There was discussion about why DARE is not an approved program because
of some "political" challenges. Tualatin Chief Winegar noted that DARE
does not have statistics to demonstrate that the program is successful. DARE
advocates are working toward getting on the "approved list"; however, the
timing of when approval will be forthcoming is not known. Dr. Lowder
noted that the district is hoping to have SRO's teach a similar program, but
this does not appear to be as straightforward an undertaking as they first
thought it would be since program administrators want their curriculums to
be taught as a whole — not just segments of the program. This matter needs
to be addressed so that a program is in place by next school year.
h. Other agenda items.
Tualatin will host the next joint meeting in about six months. The City Council
and Board members decided it would be beneficial to hold a joint meeting
twice a year.
COUNCIL MINUTES — April 16, 2002 page 5
Recessed: 8:05 p.m.
Reconvened: 8:20 p.m.
3. COMMUNICATION PLAN UPDATE
Assistant to the City Manager Newton reviewed this agenda item and staff report,
which is on file in the City Recorder's office.
Ms. Newton reviewed the communication efforts. She said CIT attendance is
declining and fluctuates depending on agenda topics. She advised staff would like to
pre-tape the June, July, August and September meetings during the day and cablecast
the meetings later. This would allow the city to present an expanded array of
programming because the taping could be stopped and started to add different types
of productions; such as interviews, educational pieces, candidate forums, etc. Staff
will update Council in October about whether this change was a success. Ms.
Newton advised there would be an opportunity for citizens to give input.
Other highlights in Ms. Newton's report were:
• advised that the City's Communication Plan is being updated
• most press releases from the City are being picked up by the media
• soon there will be an ad on the City's website asking for people to consider
becoming a Community Connector
a contract was signed with Tualatin Valley Community Access (TVCA), which
means that broadcasts may be available soon for hearings officer and planning
commission meetings
• the City's new web page was ready in January; there were 782 average daily
hits in March
• the Goal Guide continues to be published quarterly
TVCA will have new bulletin board software installed by the end of April
City Recorder Wheatley reviewed the proposed new Cityscape format, which included
adding photos and two-color printing. After brief discussion, Council consensus was
to move forward with the new format with photos and two-color print.
4. REVIEW COST-OF-SERVICE STUDY FOR PLANNING FEES
Community Development Planning Manager Dick Bewersdorff gave the staff report
and presented PowerPoint slides, which are on file in the City Recorder's office.
Financial Operations Manager Tom Imdieke and Chris Bell (a representative from
Merina & Company) were present to answer questions.
The question before Council was to determine the rate of fee recovery for planning
services.
COUNCIL MINUTES — April 16, 2002 page 6
After discussion, Council direction was as follows:
• Council is interested in reviewing a rate structure that would recoup, at a
minimum, the cost of service for specific project items, including an amount
for overhead and salaries.
• Another option Council would like to review is for a range to be established for
charges that would be imposed (from a simple administrative review and
approval charge to what charges would be needed to cover the cost of
appeals). Council asked staff to verify if the comparisons between other
jurisdictions are an "apples-to-apples" comparison.
• Council agreed that any rate structure should be tied to a consumer price index
for periodic adjustment.
Also, it would be proposed that fees be adjusted in the Washington County Urban
Growth Boundary to recover costs for projects that Tigard oversees.
5. UPDATE ON THE LONG-RANGE PLANNING DIVISION PROGRAM
Community Development Director Hendryx and Planning Manager Shields presented
the staff report on this agenda item. The staff report and charts reviewed are on file
in the City Recorder's office.
Staff noted that work from all three tiers (Council goals; state, federal and regional
programs and mandates; and ongoing research) can be accomplished if priorities are
assigned.
Council reviewed Council goals, with the consensus being as follows for the three goals
that need the most work (the Tri Met goal is 70% complete and the affordable
housing goal is well underway and staff will have an action plan for Council in August
or September):
Highest priority: Downtown/Commuter Rail
Second priority: Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program
(once Beaverton and Washington County have completed their hearings).
Third priority: Bull Mountain annexation; however, the polling of citizens for
Bull Mountain and Tigard should be done soon so Council will have
information to determine whether the question of annexation should be placed
on the November 2003 ballot.
COUNCIL MINUTES — April 16, 2002 page 7
6. CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE REVIEW — set over the April 23, 2002 Council
meeting.
7. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS - None
8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: None
9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Canceled
10. ADJOURNMENT: 9:59 p.m.
01� U C a t
atherine Wheatley, City Recordef
Attest:
n
or, ty i
ate: -� " Ly�
I:W D M\CATHY\CCM\020416.DOC
COUNCIL MINUTES — April 16, 2002 page 8