The URL can be used to link to this page

CCDA Packet - 03/06/2012 City of Tigard TIGARD CITY COUNCIL CCDA MEETING March 6, 2012 1ADesign&Communica8onslDonna\City CouneiftcpW 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov r, l:d City of Tigard CODA City Center Development Agency Board - Agenda TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: March 6,2012-6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Red Rock Creek Conference Room 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Times noted are estimated. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for City Center Development Agency Board meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the City Center Development Agency Board meeting. Please call 503-639-4171,ext.2410(voice)or 503-684-2772(TDD-Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m.on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling:503-639-4171,ext.2410 (voice)or 503-684-2772(TDD-Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA r, id City of Tigard CODA City Center Development Agency Board - Agenda TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING DATE AND March 6,2012-6:30 p.m. TIME: MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Red Rock Creek Conference Room- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING A. Call to Order-City Center Development Agency B. Roll Call C. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. RECEIVE FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT OF THE CITY OF TIGARD'S URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR(FY)2010-I1 3. DISCUSS TARGETED RETAIL AND RESTAURANT INCENTIVE PROGRAM 4. DISCUSS MAIN STREET/GREEN STREET PROJECTS PUBLIC ART COMPONENT 5. RECEIVE UPDATE ON BURNHAM STREET PARKING LOT 6. NON AGENDA ITEMS *EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Center Development Agency will go into Executive Session to discuss real property transactions,under ORS 192.660(2)(e).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision.Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 7. ADJOURNMENT SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR Tigard Citizens • Board of the City Center Development Agency City Attorney (City Council) CCDA Budget Executive Director of the City Center Committee Advisory CCDA Commission low! Wine Community City Center Finance Director Development Director Toby La France Ron Bunch Redevelopment Project Manager Sean Farrelly Development Agency Organizational Role of City Center Development Agency (CCDA) The Board That Administers the Urban Renewal Plan Responsibilities: • Establishing policies for the district and directing the Executive Director of the CCDA and staff to carry out. • Approving CCDA budgets and allocating tax increment funds. • Purchasing land from willing sellers for redevelopment as part of public/private partnerships. • Establishing rules and regulations for administration of financial and technical assistance programs and relocation regulations. • Making amendments to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan (increasing maximum amount of indebtedness and adding land greater than 1% to the district require voter approval.) • Assigning any additional specific duties to CCAC. Role of City Center Advisory Commission ( CCAC) Advisory body to CCDA on Plan implementation Responsibilities: • Making recommendations on policy, budget, and implementation of urban renewal projects to the CCDA. • Making an annual report to the CCDA including a summary of key activities, proceedings and recommendations. • Making recommendations to the CCDA for amendments to the Plan . • Performing other duties as assigned by the CCDA Tigard Downtown Streetscape Plan iyc• _ Cpl J' ^�1_.f � � '�.`•�� f �t:w.. Y 1 "-\ �( 1 ;, •, �,... „rill I; t tt �t14, 1 - ~ '- i. `- CIVIC ART Ilk .•�.Yiiti� r � � �,�. + �`�w, �.r �1�. -I.aryc wale plcwav arrAwk ur watcr w `i : ,y`• t feature\iiINC 6nm a car t .rR N``'"'1V��. + �, 1 � {• �a .'1 -Reont+xrr Nunnkcr anla,cchm V. -,Lj„^ +r,. • �� s IV '� .ftanlara ra,\c ltrma like gin anancc MAIN STREET ART `: ''1 -I t'-�` :, • , -Made pttew ayeat 1010" with sculpture i - �. • ,•� Ir wafer Fame tit Ins Ile tracrlcn On 10 �^ Matn Street r �mrtnfrr rad amu :dw+ ++ck t+ er nr r �'• •�� + .� ,tritcal ariwak vis Me ham 99N 4 1 ! An Nalk:analicr scale icviryure ahing Af Main Street _ 4.;r ltth ` •� ^ .. S -FanNamelements a.h 1�r 4� y�/y4 s' �.':� ••: .\ pnlestnanc,pertmrc • :;,y/•' F k�i GRLLN HEART ART f ` •T - An %ctmnature)mntcna n and to Jtaw t., rdaon to lanai l-reecck e.: .� t• - '� -I m mrencnIA Iltcnrs create and -,,a .y` •! ,vq+ureducattmand,tcwardchap `` IMar An thatcrcafc,hahnat,enrage,all age,. (, 4 66 and can he mtcWty: t r . at •Ner fratvc can create a,wuat link to v•• •7�'•� � � �.' `. ; .,� Iam,,Cred. 4 - e •,. .. � •AA cu .rte acanm nt puNic qwe, r• ./� �� - •r y 1 , �, Itr ev ent, • �• t TT"TT bcrivimtrawn cardcn w+madd �.+ • +' + `� , "green"pracncec ant cnnch patcstrun ccpcncnc Downtown • ' . 1 TigardDowntown StreetscapePlan Design . i . - - MAIN STREET ART CIVIC ART GREEN HEART ART W=w v _ dr IL 101111 Y t • • • Y xamplex of",the x alt:and cherarter ofam could ray emrng the an aiuracu of 1 dl cwenwtl Exwt an pacceK wall he dccttnped through anq cmnnumann and thtfnattc appmpnstcnes>s. L Public Art Design Framework from Streetscape Plan Main Street Art • Mark gateways at 99W with sculpture or water feature to invite travelers on to Main Street • Commuter rail station : clock tower or vertical artwork visible from 99W • Art Walk: smaller scale sculpture along Main St. • Enhance functional elements to enrich pedestrian experience Green Heart Art • Art with natural materials and themes to draw connection to Fanno Creek F- R.. tI :� J ; 1 T Main Street Public Art Process • CCAC subcommittee formed ( 3 CCAC members, 1 Main St. business owner, 1 Tigard artist, 1 at- large member) • Recommendations for sites, design character, goals for the artwork and budget, goals and character of the artwork • Participate in artist selection • Subcommittee makes recommendations to CCAC • CCAC makes recommendation to CCDA Suggested sites for public IF J 1 - 2f-4, GA-4, GJ-B, GN-4, S-,*,12F Z CA 2, GJ-4. GN-2. J-000? CK CA CK S, �-a001 b -1, G,-2. N-1, S-i, 1-000 s- -000z Ilk Streetscape Plan : Main StreetGateways Southwest entrance All j i �I StreetscapePlan : Main Street Gateways Northeast entrance Requested CCDA Guidance • Art should be purchased rather than leased or borrowed for temporary display • Urban renewal fund should be the primary funding source for public art • This project's funding level should about $75,000 or 2% of the estimated $3 .7 million Main Street project cost • The $75,000 for public art should be allocated 80% to the gateways ( in addition to $ 120,000 previously budgeted for gateway features) 12436 /r 124 8 K 12454 12460 12490 Al I . • �: •� 9185�. . ''N 230 i t i Feet ! r� •� - - SCALE.- 1'-30' PARALLEL RESIDENTIAL / ;LLS APARTMENT 2SI02ABO4300 3USINESS 12400 SW MAIN ST OWNER: CAPISTRANO —]LPSI F 1 PARKIN • Q4 LMT rm cru t et PARKING STRIPE - SMLL.5 1-5 (90' STANDARD 010'x iQ5) 'MOVED WITH STALLS 6-9 (90' COMPACT O 8'x16.57 IMPROVEMENTS STALLS 10-24 (90' STANDARD O 10'x18.5) HOBBY SHOP STALLS A-D (90' STANDARD O 10'x18.5) 1( BUILDING 92ABO4400 ?0 SW MAIN Sr ER: MIKE MARR W�AM�L�q 33 PAS MAKI d WINE r SAPLLS A-D (90' ST/IIKiARO O 10x18.5) BUSINESSES 1 I \ 12430 W MAI - DELI✓ERY TRUCK ACCESS REDIM 0 / 12430 SW MAIN Sr. OWNER: CAPISTRANO EDGE OF Q'1P HMR SALON (2S IO2AS04800) H MO M M&W 12442 SW MAIN ST g 10 OWNER.• FELIPA PEREZ 10 1730 I Q --�- _ 1 f COMPUTER BUSINESS7 S1PF 2SY02ABO4700 24 tKiF►T 12448SW MAIN ST - 1 2 3 4 8 13 OWNER CAPISTRANO S g B PAVEMENT D R.00, , ► /hd' 4 gg r C 5.5' ! WIDE h � ✓ACANr e 33 1a. ! SIDEWALKL LAB 2SI02ABO4800 B 1 it; 12460 SW AWN ST 17 E OWNER: CAP67RANOO _ w 24 2J 22 21 1g f8 ry t A i ! .5' 14. inIF • I �t .. BURNHAM STREET STANDARD CURB EXISTING STREET LIGHT �� .1....x.1. - PURM a•M•MIW MAIN STREET � PNam it,"&w. mi OFFSTREET PARKING LOT -' vam.10.1-71C-?If6 LAYOUT Pa NO RCCO 7WJCI KCCSS It QBRSC 1 N k fes)<t�) srglS r-s P e rokrB s7 "'^"'"'•L '^�'�"5 —' SrA(LS 10-17(w cowocr a B1163') __ 1 ST4(S r.-71(BP SMDW O 10'.105) rsa I rr SAl(S(9P SrAI.p.M ero'.rB.37 � A fJs ( COYRIC'r STA a s'.16.57 STAL[S(6O AMr^LC-SIINLNOp) * jJ 7 STALLS(Bo'ANGLE-COVMCr) I ( 7 A,-kLa STALLS It 71'.B' WAL STALLS 59 OfiMRY nNKR KCCSS BC01/rgCo to,Pelf C.ICC -104#O AAE TV& ,510}/[p1/(O 779.SY POST +aruw o■NCA°PO IMCIRNC PL'R'W u ASP,W.r A c 1 SINE PCS Aawr.laNr rw'wft ^ c lfThEsS ffi1 � ( �o C / x_77 �. 1 ■ssn sRisr F 1 � ?� ��!"1 . f~srs awls s►owe*ma mm evsmSsrs 1 1 ! •9 1 1 /+��;;++,� 7S1o7A90470- #.�" �"^-.--1 pmw 2 . �+ J1 7470 SW NOW b► CANER GRSWAV A � H w SAiO (75r01A8p•6w) ` �Q 121.7 S+MVM Sr + y cobwu[R nlo7Aeo+roo. t'c M rJ.•e Se MVM J B r0 c orNrR r�Pl6 sl J ( C 1 n Now W JJ R Sr + N N g H J7 H 0 .e "� '. 1. - • BUIPNNAN SiR[E7 ■ dam aRK^c mo SIRhCC TRVCX IO OV[OY[ _- At1C6R0 LAAFM TO PARR aeot ASLO sane: r.Jo• ...t .� MAIN STREET aa�a M + .. OFFSTREET PARKING i 4 1 • N fir•! G / s p 'fes; t •� s r Noll AIS-838 2, CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 03/06/2012 Length(in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Financial Impact Report of the City of Tigard's Urban Renewal Plan for Fiscal Year 2010-11 Submitted By: Sean Farrelly,Community Development Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: City Center Development Agency Information ISSUE Receive the Financial Impact Report of the City of Tigard's Urban Renewal Plan for Fiscal Year(FY)2010-11 STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REQUEST The City Center Development Agency(CCDA)is requested to receive the Tigard Urban Renewal Plan FY 2010- 11 Financial Impact Report. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY In previous years the CCDA has received the annual Urban Renewal Plan Financial Impact Report as a"receive and file" item through the consent agenda. Now that the CCDA is meeting regularly,staff will provide the report as part of the regular agenda.The report reflects the annual receipts and expenditures as budgeted by the CCDA. Urban renewal agencies must prepare an annual financial report for the governing body and public in accordance with Oregon Revised Statutes 457.460.The attached Financial Impact report for the fiscal year that ended June 30,2011,meets the requirement under the statute.The report includes a financial summary of the preceding fiscal year(2010- 11)year and the budget for the 2011 -2012 fiscal year.It also includes an analysis of the financial impact of carrying out the urban renewal plan on the tax collections for all affected taxing districts. As summarized in the report,there were expenditures of$280,818 charged to the City Center Development Agency for fiscal year 2010-11. $200,000 of this amount were for streetscape enhancements to the now completed Burnham Street project.Since the establishment of the district in 2006,a total of$1,067,254 in resources have been realized from tax increments generated and loans from the city's general fund.This amount is balanced with the total urban renewal requirements of$1,067,254 which includes debt service,capital outlay and ending funding balance.The majority of the ending fund balance is in the Debt Service Fund and is limited to the retirement of debt,as required by Oregon Revised Statutes,Chapter 457. To analyze the figures further,through FY 2010-11,$761,135 has been collected in tax increment and interest and$649,080 has been expended on capital projects($456,046 of which was the urban renewal contribution to Burnham Street right of way purchase and streetscape.)$249,000 has been used to repay a loan from the city's general fund. The District uses the funds it receives from the division-of-taxes method of calculating property taxes to finance various urban renewal projects and activities.These property taxes totaled$328,849 in FY 2010-11 and are expected to increase to$332,048 in FY 2011-12 per the Washington County assessment summary received after budget adoption. A summary of the report was advertised in the Tigard Times for two consecutive weeks in February,as per state law. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS,POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS Long-Term Goals: Continue implementing the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION February 22,2011 Attachments CCDA Financial Impact Report A CCDA Tigard City Center Development Agency Financial Impact Report of the City of Tigard's Urban Renewal Plan for the fiscal impact year ended June 30,2011 CCDA Tigard City Center Development Agency Financial Impact Report of the City's Urban Renewal Plan For the fiscal impact year en"June 30,2011 Introduction URBAN RENEWAL AGENCIES must prepare an annual financial report for the governing body and public in accordance with Oregon Revised Statutes 457.460. The report includes a financial summary of the preceding year and the budget for the new fiscal year. It also includes an analysis of the financial impact of carrying out the urban plan on the tax collections for all taxing districts. Urban Renewal — An Overview The purpose of urban renewal is to improve specific areas of a community that are poorly developed, under-utilized,or that have declined over time.These areas can have old,deteriorated buildings;streets and utilities in serious need of upgrades (or the areas can simply lack streets and utilities altogether), weak business activity,and few or aging parks and public facilities. Urban renewal is a process authorized by Oregon law(ORS 457) to finance improvements in these areas using"tax increment financing."A portion(the increment) of property tax revenues from properties within the urban renewal district are designated to support financing for improvements to the urban renewal area.While urban renewal provides for unique funding of improvements to a district,it is not intended that tax increment financing be the only source of funding. Other sources including ones typically used for capital improvements such as the gas tax,Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), System Development Charges (SDC),interagency funding,or state grants are programmed to support downtown projects. For a city government to utilize urban renewal as a funding mechanism,it must establish an urban renewal agency,and it must adopt an urban renewal plan.The Tigard City Council approved the City Center Urban Renewal Plan for Downtown in December of 2005.In May 2006,a special ballot measure was passed by the voters,authorizing the use of tax increment financing(urban renewal)in downtown. Urban Renewal Finance —A Summary Urban renewal is a process authorized by Oregon law to finance improvements in those neighborhoods and districts that need special attention and revitalization. Once a district is established,the tax valuation for the district is "frozen."As properties appreciate in value,the increase in taxes (the"increment") generated above the frozen base are used to pay for debt on specific projects within the urban renewal plan. These tax increments are used to repay municipal bonds.Bond proceeds are used to finance improvements that will revitalize the district. New taxes are not imposed to fund urban renewal. Bonds and tax increment financing will be used to fund projects in the urban renewal plan. Under this system, the increment portion of property taxes generated within the urban renewal area is temporarily shifted to repay the bonds used to finance projects in the City Center. 1 Tigard City Center Urban Renewal District It t _ a � i ,r 1' T / City Center i Urban Renewal District " 1 r Tigard, OR 15gard City Center Development Agency I CCDA Financial Impact Report of the City's Urban Renewal Plan For the fiscal impact year ended June 30,2011 Under tax increment financing,when the value of a property within the urban renewal district increases,the proceeds from property taxes on the increased value (the"tax increment's go to the urban renewal district.These proceeds fund further urban renewal projects,either directly or by providing for the repayment of municipal bonds that fund improvements.The tax increment is unique as a source of funding,because it is usable only for projects identified in the urban renewal plan. How Does Urban Renewal Affect Taxes? With urban renewal and the use of tax increment financing,there is no net change on Tigard property tax bills. New property taxes are not created as a result of urban renewal. Under today's Oregon law,property tax rates are fixed.Tigard's City Center Urban Renewal Plan also does not authorize any`local option" tax levies or special assessments.Tax revenues are generated from the increase in property values multiplied by current tax rates. These revenues pay for urban renewal under Oregon law. History of Tax Increment Financing In less than two decades,three ballot measures—Measure 5 (1990),and Measure 50 (1997) —have made significant changes to Oregon's system of property taxation.Those changes have influenced urban renewal programs and tax increment revenue calculations. The provisions of these changes to the property tax system,Ballot Measures 5 and 50, now are incorporated into Oregon's Constitution, and into Oregon Urban Renewal Statutes. Those provisions provide the basic framework for revenue calculations in this report. Tax Increment Calculations To determine the amount of the taxes levied, the total assessed value within each urban renewal area is segregated by the county assessor into two parts: (a) the total taxable assessed value in the district at the time the Urban Renewal Plan was adopted (the base or"frozen"value); and(b) the difference between the frozen base value and the current total assessed value (the incremental value or"excess"). Revenues derived from the application of the tax rate for each affected taxing district to the amount of the incremental value may be collected by the urban renewal agency and deposited in its debt service fund. This revenue is used to repay indebtedness incurred in carrying out the projects. Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan — Purpose The stated purpose of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan is to provide improvements in the downtown area so that it will be economically healthy while maintaining its "uniquely Tigard" character. The establishment of the urban renewal district provides a funding mechanism for projects in downtown Tigard. For more information,you may review the City Center Urban 3 C ty j/A I Tigard City Center Development Agency ►1 Financial Impact Report of the City's Urban Renewal Plan For the fiscal impact year ended June 30,2011 Renewal Plan and the report accompanying the City Center Urban Renewal Plan online at: www.tigard-or.gov/downtown_tigard/about/docs/urban_renewaLplan.pdf or request a copy from the City of Tigard. How was the Urban Renewal Plan developed? In late 2005,the same citizen-business-city partnership that worked on the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan collaborated to find financing for the"catalyst"projects identified in the Downtown Improvement Plan. Urban renewal and tax increment financing was identified as a potential source of financing and an urban renewal plan was prepared.The voter-approved Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan provides the special financing for the public improvement projects identified in the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan. What are Tigard's Specific Plans for Urban Renewal? Under Oregon law,urban renewal can provide special funding for a wide variety of projects and programs.Tigard's approved City Center Urban Renewal Plan authorizes funding for up to 35 different projects in the city center over twenty years. Most of the proposed projects in Tigard's plan are for public improvements and facilities,although some assistance for private businesses and property owners is provided.The intent of the projects such as new streets,parks,plazas,is to stimulate new investment in downtown and create a vibrant,new town center with public spaces that the community can use. As property values rise in the downtown urban renewal district, the increase in tax revenues generated supports the payment of bonds used to improve the area. Over time,it is expected that the value of property and taxes generated will be higher through the use of urban renewal than if left alone. The Tigard City Council,working closely with dozens of citizens (and after numerous hearings and meetings) included the following categories of projects in the urban renewal plan: Street Improvements,Streetscape Improvements,Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities,Parks,Public Spaces, Public Facilities,Planning and Development Assistance (for privately owned properties). Effect of Urban Renewal on Taxing Districts Carrying out an urban renewal plan has an effect on the county assessor's calculation for each taxing district that shares values with Tigard's urban renewal agency. Some property taxes that may have been received by the taxing bodies that levy property taxes within Tigard's urban renewal area are being paid to Tigard's urban renewal agency. Passage of Ballot Measure 50 (Article XI,Section 11 of the Oregon Constitution) resulted in converting most property taxes from a levy-based system to a rate-based system. Page 6 of this report shows the financial impact by taxing district for Tigard's urban renewal agency. 4 Tigard City Center Development Agency I CCDA Financial Impact Report of the City For the fiscal impact year ended June 30,2011 Financial Reports The financial reports on pages 5 and 6 account for the activities of Tigard's urban renewal agency. In accordance with ORS 457.460 (1), these reports were prepared by the Finance Department of the City of Tigard using the same basis of accounting it uses to prepare its financial statements- modified accrual basis of accounting.These reports are due annually by January 31, so the information and figures contained herein are based upon audited financial statements.At the end of each fiscal year,June 30,this financial impact report is prepared which shows the urban renewal tax impact by taxing district. Copies are available by January 31 at the Tigard Permit Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,97223. Statement of Resources and Requirements As summarized below,City Center Development Agency's 2010-11 total requirements were $280,818 for expenditures charged to the district as of June 30,2011. For fiscal year 2011-12, total budgeted resources were balanced with requirements of $1,152,603. The district uses the funds it receives from the division-of-taxes method of calculating property taxes to finance various urban renewal projects and activities.These property taxes totaled$328,849 in FY 2010-I1 and are expected to increase to $332,048 in FY 2011-12 per the Washington County assessment summary received after budget adoption. Debt Service Fund Capital Projects Fund Total Actual Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget 2010-11 2011-12 2010.11 2011-12 2010-11 2011-12 Resources: Beginning Fund Balance 414,075 384,818 42,445 89,330 456,520 474,148 Tax Increment Property Taxes 328,849 300,000 - - 328,849 300,000 Interest Income 1,067 3,455 123 - 1,190 3,455 Other Financing Sources - - 280,695 375,000 280,695 375,000 Total Resources 743,991 688,273 323,263 464,330 1,067,254 1,152,603 Requirements: Debt Service 249,000 375,000 - - 249,000 375,000 Capital Outlay - - 280,818 464,330 280,818 464,330 Ending Fund Balance 494,991 313,273 42,445 - 537,436 313,273 Total Requirements 743,991 688,273 323,263 464,330 1,067,254 1,152,603 Note: Figures are baud upon auditedhnanciulstatements. 5 CCDA ng�City Center Development Agency Financial Impact Report of the City's Urban Renewal Plan For the fiscal impact year ended June 30,2011 Detail of Purpose Capital Projects Fund Actual Budget 2010-11 2011-12 Detail of Purpose: Capital Outlay: Burnham Street Reconstruction 200,000 - Main Street Green Street related - 78,000 Land Purchase - Downtown Gateways - 120,000 Facade Improvement Program 36,091 125,150 Downtown Pre-Design Projects 44,727 141,180 280,818 464,330 Note: Rgums am based upon auditecifinanclainatements. Financial Impact of Urban Renewal Plan on Tax Collections Base year FY 2010-11 FY 2005-06 Change in Taxes levied Percent of Total Permanent Incremental Incremental Incremental Im,d on tout Taxes CMded Assessed Tax Assessed Assessed Assessed on Assessed for Taxing District Value Rate Value Value Value Taxes Value Urban Renewal Education PCC 5,028,671,727 0.2814 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 7,428.02 1,415,068 1.90% NW Regional ESO 5,028,671,727 0.1530 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 4,038.69 769,387 1.904 1igard/TuAstln School District 5,028.671,727 5.9581 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 157,273.92 29,961,329 Beaverton School DPtrkt 5,028,671,727 4.6930 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 123,879.51 23,599,556 1.90% Loral Government Washington County 5,028,671,727 2.8266 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,69 74,61279 14,214,044 1.9D% Metro 5,028,671,727 0.0961 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 2,536.72 483,255 1.904 Port of Portland 5,028,671,727 0.0698 95,004,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 1,84249 351,001 1.90% TV Fire&Rescue 5,028,671,727 1.7672 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 46,618.17 8,886,669 1.90M City of Tigard 5,028,671,727 2.5131 95,6M,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 66,337,14 12,637,555 Lm Tigard Tualatin Ascetic 5,028,671,727 0.0895 95,604,035 0,207,378 26,396,657 2,362.50 450,066 1.90% Excluded from M-5 rate gestation Washington County bonds 5,028,671,727 0.1407 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 3,71401 707.534 1.90% Metro bonds 5,028,671,717 0.3114 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 8,219.92 1,565,928 1.901' PCC bonds 5,028,671,727 0.3522 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 9,296.90 1,771,098 1.90% Tigard/rualatin School District 5,028,671,727 13805 95,W,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 36,440.58 6,942,081 1.90% Tri-Met bolls 5,028,671,727 0.0874 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 2,30.07 439,506 1.9066 City of Tigard 5,028,671,727 0.2087 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 5,508.98 1,049,484 1.90% TV Fine&Rescue 5,028,671,727 0.1076 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 2,840.28 541,085 Lam Beaverton school District 5,028,671,727 30911 95,604,035 69,207,378 26,396,657 55,198.05 10,515,455 1.90% Note',The dlNskmof-taxes process results in some property taxes that may haw been received bythe"taxing districts"that levy property taxes within the urban renewal area(for example,Washington County,NW Regional ESD(being W id over to Tigard's urban rnawal agency.The taxing distrltts forgo a share of the property tax Income dudrrg the life of an urban renewal plan so that the urban renewal agencies can carryout actrvtties that Increase properly values in the long term.The above table shows the urban renewal tax impact by taxing district using permanent rates established pursuant to Measure 50. 6 Attachments Notice of Report Availability—published twice in the Tigard Times. AIS-839 3 CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 03/06/2012 Length(in minutes): 20 Minutes Agenda Title: Targeted Retail and Restaurant Incentive Program Submitted By: Sean Farrelly,Community Development Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: City Center Development Agency Information ISSUE Discuss a tenant improvement program for targeted business types in the Tigard Downtown Urban Renewal District STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REQUEST The City Center Development Agency(CCDA)is requested to review and discuss with staff a proposed tenant improvement program directed towards targeted business types. Staff will use the CCDA's input to finalize the program details for final approval by CCAC and CCDA at a later date. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Well designed and executed incentive programs can be highly effective to attract new businesses,enhance existing business opportunities and create a more attractive,vibrant and economically robust downtown. One of City Council's 2012 Goals is to, "begin cooperative efforts to secure tenants that will contribute to the vitality of downtown."One way the CCDA can do this is to offer tenant improvement assistance.The objectives of this and other incentive programs are to: •Fill vacancies on Main Street; •Attract retail and food service businesses that will enhance the vitality of Main Street;and •Improve the aesthetic quality and pedestrian orientation of Main Street. Since 2009,the agency has had a Facade Improvement Program that provided architectural design assistance to 15 businesses and$37,265 in matching grant funding.These grants leveraged an additional$71,050 in spending on the projects by receiving business/property owners. Several other fagade projects are pending.Only projects that improve the exterior of the building visible to the street are eligible.Interior or tenant improvements are currently not eligible. Interviews with commercial brokers and owners of vacant properties revealed that there have been many prospective business tenants interested in leasing vacant downtown buildings;however,the costs of required tenant improvements have impeded the deals.Property owners are often reluctant to make high priced improvements for smaller independent businesses.Also,many tenants have a desire for"flex space"that older buildings'floor plans do not always provide.These conditions also make private financing difficult to obtain.The result is that buildings stay vacant or are leased to low customer volume businesses that require minimal tenant improvements. Therefore,it is proposed that a"Targeted Retail and Restaurant Incentive Program"(TRRIP)be established to offer matching grants to prospective retail and restaurant tenants to help offset the cost of interior tenant improvements. Staff researched similar programs around the country.A range of program options were presented to the City Center Advisory Commission(CCAC)at its February meeting.The CCAC subsequently recommended the following be considered: Proposed Grant Amount: •A 50%matching grant up to$25,000 is proposed for tenant improvements to ground floor retail uses.A 50%matching grant up to$40,000 is suggested for restaurants,due to the higher costs of tenant improvements for this use. Loans were considered,but research found that they were less effective and required more staff time and resources to administer.An option CCDA may wish to consider is basing the maximum grant award for each project on the square footage of occupied commercial space.For instance,the program can match up to$10.00 per square foot not to exceed$25,000 for retail,and$15.00 per square foot not to exceed$40,000 for restaurants. Proposed Eligible Applicants and Award Criteria: •Applications will be considered from businesses locating on Main Street that a)will have operations on the ground floor; b) will generate foot traffic and improve the retail climate of Main Street;c)provide employment opportunities;and d)are consistent with the vision presented in city planning documents. •Grants will be available to a variety of businesses, including:a)food-related ventures such as grocery stores,restaurants, coffee/tea shops,bakeries,produce markets,health food stores and other specialty food stores;b)active retail such as art galleries,apparel stores,bookstores,drugstores or pharmacies,general merchandise stores and hobby shops;c)theaters and family entertainment;and d)neighborhood services such as shoe repair shops and hair salons. Proposed Eligible Improvements: •Hazardous materials abatement,such as asbestos removal; •Demolition and shell reconstruction; •Plumbing,mechanical and electrical improvements; •Fire/life safety improvements including seismic upgrades and fire suppression systems; •Interior finishes including flooring,painting and built-in casework; and •Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)improvements. Ineligible Uses: •Ineligible uses include,but are not necessarily limited to,a)pawn shops;b)currency exchanges including check-cashing agencies and some non-bank financial retail outlets;c)passive real estate ownership and management firms and other non-active office uses;d)national franchises;and e)government offices and residential properties. Applicant Requirements: •Applicant must have a signed lease for the subject property with at least 3 years remaining from the estimated completion date of the proposed tenant improvement project. •Owner and tenant applicant must be current on any current city charges,taxes or assessments. •Businesses must comply with current zoning ordinance. Additional Considerations: The following are additional questions which the CCDA is requested to consider. •Should grant proceeds be paid directly to contractors so that the business owner does not need to provide equity for the full cost of improvements? •Are both property owners and tenants eligible applicants? •Is only Main Street eligible? •Must the building be currently vacant?If so,for how long? Staff will work with stakeholders to finalize the program details for final approval by CCAC and CCDA.$75,000 in funding has been requested for Fiscal Year 2012-13. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CCDA may choose not to initiate this program and direct staff to pursue other alternatives. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS,POLICIES,MASTER PLANS Goal 3b Contact owners of key,structurally sound Main Street buildings with vacancies.Begin cooperative effort to secure tenants that will contribute to the vitality of downtown. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION N/A Fiscal Impact Cost: $75,000 requested Budgeted(yes or no): no Where Budgeted(department/program): requested in CCDA FY2012-13 budget Additional Fiscal Notes: $75,000 will be requested in the FY 2012-13 CCDA budget. Attachments No fuel's)attached AIS-843 ¢, CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 03/06/2012 Length(in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Main Street Green Street Public Art Submitted By: Sean Farrelly,Community Development Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: City Center Development Agency Information ISSUE Public art is being planned as part of the Main Street Green Street project and City Center Development Agency (CCDA)input is requested on the proposed project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REQUEST CCDA input is requested on the City Center Advisory Commisson(CCAC)recommendations regarding the Main Street/ Green Street project's public art component. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Tigard Downtown Streetscape Plan,was adopted by CCDA Resolution 06-02 as a guide for improvements to downtown streetscapes,gateways,public spaces,and green streets.The purpose of its recommendations are to improve the downtown's vitality by enhancing the experience of those who visit,work and shop in the area. Within the vicinity of Main Street,the plan's recommendations include: •Mark gateways at Pacific Highway with sculptures or water features to invite travelers onto Main Street •Install a clock tower or vertical artwork visible from Pacific Highway at the commuter rail station •Develop an art walk along Main Street consisting of small sculptures •Enhance functional elements to enrich pedestrian experience The Main Street Green Street Project is currently being designed.The City Center Advisory Commission(CCAC)formed a subcommittee(3 CCAC members and 3 additional members representing stakeholders)to work with staff and a consultant to integrate public art into the project.The subcommittee is charged with making recommendations about the character and type of artwork desired,and to recommend the selection or commissioning of art.The committee's recommendations were guided by the adopted Streetscape Plan. The CCAC has reviewed the subcommittee recommendations and is in agreement. Since the CCAC's recommendations are advisory,the CCDA is requested to provide input on the following. •Art should be purchased rather than leased or borrowed for temporary display •Preferred sites for public art should be identified on Main Street •The urban renewal fund should be the primary funding source for public art •This project's funding level should about$75,000 or two percent of the estimated$3.7 million Main Street project cost •The$75,000 for public art should be allocated 80%to the gateways and 20%to Main Street It should be noted that the subcommittee recommends that the clock tower could pursued apart from the Main Street Green Street Project,with potential funds from a mix of sources,including urban renewal and community participation. In considering the CCAC recommendations,the CCDA may wish to take into account the following information.Most jurisdictions and agencies interested in public art consider one percent of public project costs as the minimum threshold for an effective public art program. Two percent or more is not uncommmon.An expenditure of$75,000 could establish an effective art presence on Main street through purchase of eight to fifteen art pieces such as scuptures;decorative seating,metal work, etc. Also,the CCDA may wish to consider where it wishes the emphasis of public art to be.The CCAC and its subcommittee have proposed that 80%of the proposed public art budget be expended on art at the Downtown's gateways,leaving$15,000 for the remainder of Main Street. The fiscal year 2011 - 12 budget has already allocated$120,000 to construct gateway monuments at both intersections of Main Street and Pacific Highway. The design of these have not been done,but they were envisioned as being similar in scale and materials as the Burnham Street/Hall Blvd.monument.The CCAC recommendation would add$60,000 to this amount. In view of this the CCDA may want to consider,and agency staff is seeking guidance about the following questions: •What is the appropriate level of an at the gateways? •Should most of the funds proposed to be spent for Main Street public art be directed to the downtown's gateways? •Is there a way to accomplish both objectives of a significant art presence on Main Street and also at the gateways? OTHER ALTERNATIVES The CCDA may accept or modify the CCAC's recommedations. In addition it may also choose to remand all or a portion of the recommendations back to the CCAC with or without direction. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS,POLICIES,MASTER PLANS Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan Council Goal 3a.Downtown :Identify a geographic-opportunity area in the downtown with the greatest potential to create a catalyst for further development.Concentrate most resources there. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION Resolution 06-02:CCDA adopts the Tigard Downtown Streetscape Plan Fiscal Impact Cost: $75,000 request Budgeted(yes or no): no Where Budgeted(department/program): CCDA Additional Fiscal Notes: A budget request for public art will be included in the FY 2012-13 CCDA budget. Public art will be part of the urban renewal contribution to the Main Street green street project. The FY 2011-12 budget included$120,000 line item for Main Street gateways. Attachments Desien Framework from Streetscane Plan Design Frameworq • Introduction for downtown was integral to the development of a • Ephemeral outdoor projects Akey step in completing the Downtown Streetscape Design Framework.The project team and the SWG Transit Improvements Plan—location,access and Objectoricr ted works Design Plan was establishing a Design Framework for approached the question of theme as three interrelated station improvements for bus and commuter rail Performance art the public realm of downtown.The framework reflects parts.Each thematic part was considered as a basis of Street Lighting Plan—lighting types and spacing Text-based works the Preferred Design Alternative from the Tigard design. (full lighting analysis can be found in the Project Light and media works Downtown Improvement Plan(TDIP)and was Appendix memorandum titled Tigard Downtown Demonstration or community gardens developed during work sessions with the Streetscape Functional Design addresses safety,comfort and Streetscape Design Plan:Sheet Lighting Working Group(SWG).It provided a thematic basis access for users of the transportation system Recommendations by DKS Associates) Attempts to make public art uniform or singular in its for concept design to implement the TDIP vision. Green Heart addresses trees and landscaping, Street Tree Plan—spacing and canopy types theme are not encouraged.Art is a unique opportunity In any downtown revitalization effort vision cannot be connections to open spaces,and sustainability Street Connectivity—future roadway connections to step outside the conventional design vocabularies of the only element.The Design Framework focuses on Artistic Representation addresses streetscape streetscape and public space.Through its diversity and specific downtown improvement projects. furnishings expressing a style or historic period Street connectivity was part of an overall traffic creative expression of ideas and themes it can brighten analysis for street function improvements.The analysis the experience of downtown and the interconnected • Streetscape Enhancements A palette of unifying elements for streetscape and addressed existing and future traffic conditions, flow of people. • Downtown Gateways gateway design was developed.The primary alternative transportation modes,functional • Public Spaces characteristics are texture,color,and form,suggesting requirements for street and intersection design,and it - a"family of materials"throughout the downtown area, recommended roadway connections.The full analysis air The combination of specific materials may vary from can be found in the Project Appendix memorandum Each project is an opportunity for action.Over time, place to place but there should be a visually titled Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan: completed projects will represent a significant public recognizable consistency. Traffic Analysis for Street Function Improvements by _ investment in the downtown's public realm.Fully DKS Associates. • realizing the potential of downtown Tigard will also An overarching theme discussed with the SWG was ` require the City to become plan stewards by funding sustainability in the revitalization of downtown. PabHc Art Plan and creating project partnering opportunities for the Becoming a more sustainable society is another Public an can bring more vitality to the downtown urban renewal district,and by reexamining the City's unifying element for the specific themes and guiding experience by creating a set of interconnected places, zoning and development standards. principles of the TDER the Downtown Streetscape and emphasizing the flow of people,history,and Design Plan,and furore economic development of nature.It can create a more memorable experience of _ Design Themes and Unifying Elements Tigard.Specific sustainable principles can include: street corridors,gateways and public spaces,which are Discussion and refinement of a general design theme key aspects of the public realm.The Public An Plan n • Recognize mature,healthy trees as a high identifies three distinct areas within downtown for A meeting of the Streetscape Working Group performing environmental tool in the design tool complementary but slightly different types of public kit art: • Make sustainable practices a visible educational _ tool Civic Art _ • Improve pedestrian access and circulation Main Street Art _ • Recognize environmental and social Omen Heart Art sustainability provided by open spaces ,• `'�` n • Emphasize green street storrawater management Implementing a public an program should include r" • Identify policy and development tools to assessing the potential for regional support and integrate sustainable systems funding,setting aside urban renewal funding for art, formalizing public art as part of the City's mission,and Functional Plans coordinating with local businesses.Implementing The Design Framework includes a series of functional actual artwork should emphasize a variety of artworks , plans for the downtown area: and experiences. For example: - Pedestrian and Bike Plan—primary routes and Project inspired by local history The Mayor of Tigard Addresses a Public Open House recommended street crossing improvements Ecological and nature-based art for the Downtown Streetscape Plan on May 25,2W PROJECTAREA Downtown Streetscape 1 2 Oity of Design Frameworq! TWEILOTtC ELEWELJlTS Theme as Functional Design Theme as Green Heart - -- Theme as Artistic Representation Safety,Comfort and Access Open Space,Sustainability,Connections Style or Historic Period Opportu titles: Opportunities: - Opportunities: -Pedestrian Environment -Trees and Landscaping ey{_ -Street Lighting -Walkability -Connections to Public Spaces -Street Furnishings -Bike Travel -Connections to Fanno Creek ! N�! -Sidewalk Paving -Access to Transit -Sustainability -Public Art -On-Street Parking -Public Art -Traffic Calming Implementation: Implementation: -Street Design Concepts Implementation: -Street Design -Gateways/Public Spaces -Street Design Concepts -Green Street Guidelines -Transit Functional Plan -Pedestrian/Bike Plan -Gateways/Public Spaces -Public Spaces/Gateways -Pedcstrian/Bike Functional Plan -Transit Functional Plan -Connections to Public Spaces -Street Lighting Functional Plan -Unifying Materials Palette td _ r F.' n � • • rl StreetscapeP . City �f t I-3 Design • 7 Guiding Principles Streetscape firniings are finishing touches for"place making."They create a human s _ scale and help to identify different functional areas of the streetscape.Complementary Classical StVlc - furnishings based on guidelines from the Unifying Elements will provide a thematic consistency that is a key implementing principle for the Downtown Streetscape rh.�'�•` >.�.� mist�:.,. Design Plan. Preferred as the dominant theme in streetscapes and gateways Information kiosks and signage are opportunities to incorporate furnishing characteristics into other visible elements of the straetscape.Signage may be developed with unique architectural forms and materials or grouped with information kiosks. Kiosks _ can use an architectural form suggestive of other conspicuous forms such as the commuter rail station.Consideration should h also be given to masony pole bases for the - - conventional types of street and traffic signs. Contemporary- ' As an example,pole bases could be P complementary to the columns and walls of Art Style ! +f nearby Gateway designs. Limited use as a counterpoint to cla- ,iI.tc l c in arcapc"I",and 1,11, acs L ::J C , f Naturalistic Style It k. Applicable in Fatmo Creek area,Commercial St.gat:way Downtown Streetscape—PW and public areas 1 lA 4� City of 0 Design Fram—ewor7 TENURE .�.w Key Themes Cm mu,trivet. Sidewalks gateways•public Unifying elements for downtown spare, _ \ streencapes.gateways and public spaces are sem. Gerow,,,public spare. intended to express the themes of an urban (capec,ally Fanno Crack) g. 1� village and a••green heart."The emphasis on Compacted m Pac grevel C.k spaces et wa:ully F. I � one theme over another may very from street Crtek)arM Gateways to street,gateway to gateway and among the Decorative metals Bridge/overlook ilio,,barrier key public spaces.However,a unifying fencing,meet fare shm, palette of textures,colors and forts suggests a"family of places"and the visual interest Color. Color is a visually unifying element COLOR-and FORM found in diversity oldesign. linked to coverall materials.Colors tie together spaces separated by distance and k• _ Tedure: Texture can be a unifying element function.Black is recommended as a unifying through a simple and consistent palette of color for streetscape furnishings and materials for paving,walls,columns and decorative railings.Complimentary colors of railings.The materials may be used in grays and reds/oranges can he found in the -_- - varying combinations as pan of streetscape selection of sidewalk/gateway paving, 9 and gateway designs. gateway columns,walls and naturalistic stone �- r• - _ work milizing locally available basalt or - - Afolariel Applirafion similar material. scored ansate Sidewalks,crosswalks,gimemys Pervious concrete Sidewalks,pteways,public Plant Materials are an important color and F spaces textural element as well,providing the unifying appearance of green(especially in the street tree canopy)and seasonal change 1 through Flowers,fall foliage and colorful / winter stems and breaches. Fora,: Form can provide both visual unity and interesting visual distinction.Form,along F _ = 14t h,�- with color and texture,provides a sense of _ orientation fm downtown and serves as � •, — 4 t� visible landmarks.The preferred form for downtown is the"classic'or"traditional' style,particularly with regard to streetscape furnishings. However,more naturalistic forms may also be appropriate at gateways or s, within the public spaces,especially near Fenno Creek. _ PublicArl.Public is an opportunity to explore the use okey textures, complementary tee xtures not found in other enjoyable le gateway elements,and provide enjoyable elements of surprise in form or interpretation of themes. 1 • _ ]-5 �... 41 Y , . CIVIC ART Et^ , -Large scale gateway artwork or water feature visible from a car _ -Reinforce Hunziker intersection realignment Reinforce civic themes like governance a A MAIN STREET ART Mark gateways at 99W with sculpture or water feature to invite travelers onto p Main Street Commuter rail station:clock tower or vertical artwork visible from 99W w y ' -Art Walk:smaller scale sculpture along •,yam y v� ti ' K "'j kr MainStreet Enhance functional elements to enrich *y�� ,.:t� pedestrian experience a ; 4. GREEN HEART ART ` >, ? , -Art with natural materials and themes �' ' ! FA �, 1sr y ` to draw connection to Fauna Creek -• y -Environmental themes create and i\ � i ` ✓ ?, _},� support education and stewardship � �k Art that creates iveq engages all ages,C..� and can 6e interactactive Water feature can create a visual link to Fanno Creek w Art supports creation of public spaces for events Demonstration garden to model �R'•A „t d " !'> - "green"practices and enrich pedestrian experience 1 D es i• —or k A MAIN STREET ART CIVIC ART GREEN HEART ART Mollin 09 a Ile i Downtown • - Plar Examples of how the scale and character of art could vary among the an districts of 1 downtown.Exact art pieces will be developed through artist commissions and thematic appropriateness. City1.7 Design F-rameworq ttttttttttt� Streetscape Design Concepts (uus gwj-t) ttt� m Future Street Improvements OGateway Design Concepts ♦.♦ �® (thispmjW) ♦ ♦ 10 • , Future Gateways ♦% t ♦ ♦`"♦ _ Fanno Creek Master Plan �\ Ff� ♦♦ „'� ♦t♦ ''�w ♦ .1I ♦♦. 1 Green Corridor Urban Creek % -16 ♦ ♦ I�� ♦ ♦ 11I ♦ ♦J. *I ♦ Neighborhood Park ♦ %•a♦ t(t� titer Multi Use Trail / , i �_ New Railroad Crossing ' \\4'I Downtown 1 • City • _ • J AIS-844 5. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 03/06/2012 Length(in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Burnham Street Public Parking Lot Submitted By: Sean Farrelly,Community Development Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: City Center Development Agency Information ISSUE CCDA will be updated on the Burnham Street parking lot to be constructed summer 2012. STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REQUEST Staff requests CCDA receive the update and provide input if desired. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY In FY 2011-12 urban renewal funds were requested to construct a paved public parking lot with landscaping,stormwater treatment and lighting on two city-owned lots on Burnham Street.To mitigate potential construction impacts, a commitment was made to Main Street businesses to have the lot open prior to the Green Street project.To keep this commitment,the lot is scheduled for construction in the summer of 2012. The city engineering department has designed a layout for 24 parking spaces.The design of the lot will allow for circulation through the adjoining parking lots to the northeast.There is potential to expand improved parking if agreements can be made with adjoining property owners such as cost sharing. Because this parking lot has potential to be part of a future parking structure there has been an effort to keep its intial construction costs modest.There is also an opportunity for a design feature to be integrated into the project on the southeastern corner of the site;such a feature would enhance Brunham Street's streetscape. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS,POLICIES,MASTER PLANS Council Long Term Goals Continue implementing Downtown Urban Renewal Plan. City Center Urban Renewal Plan: Public parking is an approved project DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION February 15,2011-Discussion of Main Street Green Street Parking Fiscal Impact Cost: 150,000 Budgeted(yes or no): partial Where Budgeted(department/program): CCDA Additional Fiscal Notes: In FY 2011-12$50,000 was requested to construct a public parking lot on two city-owned lots on Burnham Street.Design considerations have increased the budget by$]00,000. Attachments Bumham Parking,Lot design A,McQuWk®x005-2011 Destiny Sa art Inc.,All RlpRts Rce,ed VIYL IYNI HtVGJJ� \ SCALE. 1 =30' 'ARALL£L RESIDENTIAL ALLS APARTMENT 2SI02ABO4300 4USINESS 12400 SW MAIN ST OWNER: CAPISTRANO PHASE 1 PARKING DATA: (24 CITY STALIS) PARKING STRIPE STALLS 1-5 (90' STANDARD 010'x 18.5) ' "MOVED WITH I STALLS 6-9 (90' COMPACT O 8'x16.5) I IMPROVEMENTS IxSTALLS 10-24 (90' STANDARD O 10'x18.5) HOBBY SHOP STALLS A-D (90' STANDARD O 10'x18.5) K BUILDING 92AB04400 ?0 SW MAIN ST ER: MIKE MARR VACANT LAS 33 PARKING: MAKI & WINET STALLS A-D (90' STANDARD O 1O'x18.5) BUSINESSES � 2S 102ABO4500 - PO PO & %k - DELIVERY TRUCK ACCESS REQUIRED 12430 SW MAIN ST. OVERH WIRES OWNER: CAPISTRANO TO R£ IN * OHP T EDGE OF OHp \ OHP HAIR SALON (2S102ABO4600) r 12442 SW "4/NST MOUNTABLE T 10 OWNER. F£LlPA PEREZ CO VERT ER CU 9 e TO 1730 VA I 8 S 11 DE COMPUIER dUSINESS - 7 LIGHT 2S102AS04700 24' 12448 SW MAIN ST I I I6 2 3 4 5 OWNER: CAPISTRANO � 13 EDGE OF PAVEMENT D N R:10' asa�+11 R:8' 4 r 7 1 5.5' WIDE I CIL 5 /II VACANT LAB 33 C ;10• I SIDEWALK R:20' / 2SI02ABO4800 B I €G 12460 SW MAIN ST 17 II € OWNER: CAPISTRANO 24 23 22 21 19 18 d A i I 4" O. I h B� :5' o 72 Pp R BURNHAM STREET STANDARD CURB EXISTING STREET LIGHT ' ENa%� °"ION MAIN STREET FIGURE PU9= WORKS OEVARThEM FIG- 1 13125 &O 1w.1. 22J OFFSTREET PARKING LOT VOCE-, OREGON 2466 VOCE- 50.1-621-0752 FILE NO W »:>�-O&M LAYOUT CCDA CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CCDA) MEETING 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 NOTICE OF TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CCDA) MEETING ON MARCH 6, 2012 MEETING Red Rock Creek Conference Room—6:30 p.m. • Public Welcome EXECUTIVE SESSION(immediately after regular meeting) Red Rock Creek Conference Room •Not Open to the Public An Executive Session is called under ORS 192.660(2) (e)to discuss real property transactions.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. Please forward to: ❑ Sally Ho,The Oregonian (sho@oregonian.com) ❑ Editor,The Regal Courier(Editor@theregalcourier.com) ❑ Geoff Pursinger,Tigard Times(gpursinger@commnewspapers.com) ❑ Newsroom,The Tithes (Fax No. 503-546-0724) The CCDA was reactivated by Resolution 05-32 on May 10,2005,and will meet occasionally to address issues related to urban renewal.The CCDA,functioning as the city's urban renewal agency,will work on an urban renewal plan designed to facilitate the development and redevelopment of downtown Tigard and possibly other areas within the city. For further information,please contact Deputy City Recorder Carol Kragerby calling 503-718-2419. Deputy City RecordeF Date: z!CYlttccrt, a 8 ao/2 Post: Tigard City Hall Tigard Permit Center Tigard Public Library CCDA City Center Development Agency City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of Posting In the Matter of the Notification of the February 2012 CCDA Meetings STATE OF OREGON) County of Washington) ss. City of Tigard ) I, �/�/IP� being fust duly sworn (or affirmed),by oath (or affirmation),depose and say: That I posted in ➢ Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon ➢ Tigard Public Library, 13500 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon ➢ Tigard Permit Center, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon —7 A copy of s Notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the / day` of 2012. 2012. Sign tie-of Person who erformed 1 f6tification Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me this day of c 12012. SEALSignature of Notary Public for OregWHEATLEY- OREGON NO.459116Im AUOUST 04,2015 CCDA CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY(CCDA) FEBRUARY 2012 MEETINGS 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 NOTICE OF TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CCDA) FEBRUARY 2012 MEETINGS FEBRUARY 14,2012 - EXECUTIVE SESSION Held in Red Rock Creek Conference Room—6:30 p.m. •Not Open to the Public An Executive Session is called under ORS 192.660 (2) (e)to discuss real property transactions.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. FEBRUARY 21, 2012-JOINT MEETING WITH CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) Held in Town Hall—6:30 p.m. • Public Welcome Please forward to: ❑ Sally Ho,The Oregonian (sho@oregonian.com) ❑ Editor,The Regal Courier(Editor@theregalcourier.com) ❑ Geoff Pursinger,Tigard Times(gpursinger@commnewspapers.com) ❑Newsroom,The Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) The CCDA was reactivated by Resolution 05-32 on May 10,2005,and will meet occasionally to address issues related to urban renewal The CCDA,functioning as the city's urban renewal agency,will work on an urban renewal plan designed to facilitate the development and redevelopment of downtown Tigard and possibly other areas within the city. For further information,please contact Deputy City Recorder Carol Krager by calling 503-718-2419. Deputy City Recofder C Date: February 7.2012 Post: Tigard City Hall Tigard Permit Center Tigard Public Library Q s• CCDA City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of CCDA Notification In the Matter of the Notification of the CCDA February 2012 Meetings STATE OF OREGON) County of Washington) ss. City of Tigard,�7 ) I, L �//IO' A- first duly sworn (or affirmed), by oath (or affirmation),depose and say: That I notified the following organization by fax : Newsroom,Tigard Times and the following people/organizations by e-mail: 'L� Sally Ho,The Oregonian (shogoregoni nxamn) E�-' Editor,The Regal Courier(EditorntheregalcoUner.com) Geoff Pursinger,Tigard Times(gpursingu@commnewsn�aners.com) A copj of said Notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof,on the Z day of 2012. Signature of Person who Performed Notifica n Subscribed and swom (or affirmed) before me this�day of 12. L SEALS1gna of Notary Pubhc for Oregon WHEATLEYC - OREGONtm N0.459116 AUGUST 04,2015 4 ww Transmit Confirmation Report ww P. 1 Feb 7 2012 11 :19am D.S.S Name/Fax No. Mode Start Time Page Result Note 5035460724 Normal 07, 11 :19am 0'30" 1 * 0 K �r,A CCDA CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY(CODA) FEBRUARY 2012 MEETINGS 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 47223 NOTICE OF TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY(CCDA) FEBRUARY 2012 MEETINGS FEBRUARY U,2012.EXECUTIVE SESSION Held in Red Rock Creek Confrtence Room—6:30 p.m.a Not Opm to the Public An Esocuwe Session is abed uadm OILS 192660(2)(a)to discuss teal property tnestcdoes.All d,,oninno,an, ronfidenual and those prment^way disclose nothing from the Sesnoa.Repusenti ive,of she seas media ate 'Unwed to attend Eucneve Sessions,.as pmvlded by ORS 192660(4),but must not disclose any mfo,,stim disoused No Exem five Session snny be held fox the purpose of thing any final action ox making any final deasiom Executive Sessions am.closed to thepwbli, FEBRUARY 21,2012-JOINT MEETING WITH CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION(CCAC) Held in Town Hall—6:30 p.m.•Public Welcome Please forward to: ❑Selly Ho,The Oregonian(sho@oregouuuxi;-ren) C Editor,The Regal Coude,(EdimrQthet<gdconder.com) O Geoff Puainger,Tigard Tortes(gpuaimgae(g)cotmmnewspapess.com) El Newsroom,The Time(Fan No.503546-0724) The CCDA was reacdvand by Resohssiom 05-32 on May to,?oo5,and will msec ocasimapy to address issues relued to wban moewal the CCDA,fonctimilug ss the city's urban renewal agency,will work no an urban renewal plan designed to facilitate the developmemt and redevelopment of downtown Tigard and possibly other ateas widini the city. For further information,please contact Deputy City Recorder Carol Kruger by oil(ki�n/g/50}71&2419. C epuj "t- R&cof r Date F bru9v 7 201c2otaa Post Tigard City Hall Tigard Pe.®it Curter Tigard Public Library i i i CCDA City Center Development Agency City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of Posting In the Matter of the Notification of the March 2012 CCDA Meeting and Executive Session STATE OF OREGON) County of Washington) ss. City�f Tigard , ) J I,��,) h M Gi 1 14 l: .t ,being first duly sworn (or affirmed),by oath (or' affirmation), depose and say: That I posted in ➢ Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon ➢ Tigard Public Library, 13500 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon ➢ Tigard Permit Center, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon A copy of said Notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the CK 0 day of 2012. Signature of Person who Performed Notition Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me this day of ^ ,2012. �1��iC.ei►,._Q�it/ Signature of Notary Public for OregonV OFFICIAL SEAL CATHERINE D WHEATLEY NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON COMMISSION NO.459116 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 04,2015 1' CCDA CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CCDA) MEETING 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 NOTICE OF TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CCDA) MEETING ON MARCH 6, 2012 MEETING Red Rock Creek Conference Room—6:30 p.m. • Public Welcome EXECUTIVE SESSION (immediately after regular meeting) Red Rock Creek Conference Room • Not Open to the Public An Executive Session is called under ORS 192.660 (2) (e)to discuss real property transactions.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. Please forward to: ❑ Sally Ho,The Oregonian (sho@oregonian.com) ❑ Editor,The Regal Courier(Editor@theregalcourier.com) ❑ Geoff Pursinger,Tigard Times(gpursinger@commnewspapers.com) ❑ Newsroom,The Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) The CCDA was reactivated by Resolution 05-32 on May 10,2005,and will meet occasionally to address issues related to urban renewal.The CCDA,functioning as the city's urban renewal agency,will work on an urban renewal plan designed to facilitate the development and redevelopment of downtown Tigard and possibly other areas within the city. For further information,please contact Deputy City Recorder Carol Krager by calling 503-718-2419. Deputy City Record Date: Post: Tigard City Hall Tigard Permit Center Tigard Public Library i i jai ICCDA, City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of CCDA Notification In the Matter of the Notification of the CCDA March 2012 Meetings STATE OF OREGON) County of Washington) ss. City of Tigard ) I, ,being first duly sworn (or affirmed),by oath (or affirmation),depose and say: That I notified the following organization by fax : ❑ Newsroom,Tigard Times and the following people/organizations by e-mail: ❑ Sally Ho,The Oregonian(shonoregonian.com) ❑ Editor,The Regal Courier(Editor(&theregalcourier.com) ❑ Geoff Pursinger,Tigard Times(gpursingerncommnewspapg .com) A copy of said Notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the day o 2012. Signature of Person who Performed 146tification Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me this / day of 2012. 01 Signature of Notary Public for Oregon CCDA CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CCDA) MEETING 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 NOTICE OF TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CCDA) MEETING ON MARCH 6, 2012 MEETING Red Rock Creek Conference Room—6:30 p.m. • Public Welcome EXECUTIVE SESSION (immediately after regular meeting) Red Rock Creek Conference Room • Not Open to the Public An Executive Session is called under ORS 192.660(2) (e)to discuss real property transactions.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. Please forward to: ❑ Sally Ho,The Oregonian (sho@oregonian.com) ❑ Editor,The Regal Courier(Editor@theregalcourier.com) ❑ Geoff Pursinger,Tigard Times(gpursinger@commnewspapers.com) ❑ Newsroom,The Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) The CCDA was reactivated by Resolution 05-32 on May 10,2005,and will meet occasionally to address issues related to urban renewal.The CCDA,functioning as the city's urban renewal agency,will work on an urban renewal plan designed to facilitate the development and redevelopment of downtown Tigard and possibly other areas within the city. For further information,please contact Deputy City Recorder Carol Krager by calling 503-718-2419. Deputy City Record Date: f 6?I.t C{y t, �� v�0%Z Post: Tigard City Hall Tigard Permit Center Tigard Public Library Acw Transmit Confirmation Report ww P. 1 Feb 28 2012 10:14am D.S.S Name/Fax No. Mode Start Time Page Result Note 5035460724 Normal 28, 10:14am 0'30" 1 * 0 K CCDA, CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY(CCDA) MEETING 13125 SW HaU Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 NOTICE OF TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY(CCDA) MEETING ON MARCH 6, 2012 MEETING Red Rock Creek Conference Room—6:30 p.m•Public Welcome EXECUTIVE SESSION(immediately after regular meeting) Red Rock Creek Conference Room—.•Not Opm to the Public An Executive Session is called tinder QRS 192 660(2)(e)to discuss real ptopexty transactions.An discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Scasion.Repruentzmes of the news media are allowed to attend Execative Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),bat must not disclose any idfotmation diacvssed.No Eacwtiva Session may be held for the purpose of taking any 6=4 action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are dosed to the public. Please forward to: ❑Sally Ho,The Ckegonian(shota,�oregortian.com) L,Editor,The Regal Courier(Editot@theregalcouzier.com) ❑Geoff Pursinger,Tigard TimesWursingcr®comtnnewspapers.com) C3 Newsroom,The Times(Paz No.503-546-0724) The CCDA,was reactivated by Resolution 05-32 on May 10,2005,and will meet occasionally to address issues related to urban renewal.The CCDA,functioning as the city's urban renewal agency,will work on an urban renewal plan designed to facilitate the development and redevelopment of downtown Tigard and possibly other areas within the city. For f atther infoanation,please contact Deputy City Recorder Carol Kragex by calling 503-718-2419. Deputy City Record ]Date: Post: Tigard City Hall Tigard Permit Center Tigard Public library