The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 08/10/2010 . T,tGARD City of Tigard TIGARD CITY COUNCIL BUSI\ 1-1 M1 August 10, 2010 COU \CIL MI WILL BFI', TKLI - WIS E - I: \Ofs \Donna \Ccpktl 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard- or.gov q City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting - Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 10, 2010 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign -up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign -in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503- 639 -4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503- 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503- 639 -4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503- 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA CABLE VIEWERS: The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. a City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting - Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 10, 2010 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM • STUDY SESSION • PRESENTATION OF THE WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN • PRESENTATION OF THE SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN • ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS • Attached is Revised Agenda Item No. 3.5 b. for the LCRB award of contract for the Pavement Management Program Asphaltic Concrete Overlay to Knife River Corporation. The amount of the award was reduced to not to exceed $475,000, which includes a small projected contingency of about $17,000. The project was reduced with the removal of two streets: 98th Avenue from Scott Court to Greenburg Road and the North Dakota Street from Greenburg Road to 95th Avenue. Council Calendar August 17, Workshop Meeting - 6:30 p.m. August 24, Business Meeting - Cancelled • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to review and evaluate the City Manager under ORS 192.660(2) (i). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non - Agenda Items 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less, Please) 2.1 Follow -up to Previous Citizen Communication 2.2 Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce Update (distributed during meeting) 2.3 Citizen Communication — Sign Up Sheet 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council & Local Contract Review Board) These items are considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Receive and File: a. Council Calendar b. Tentative Agenda 3.2 Approve Council Minutes: a. May 25, 2010 3.3 Appoint Donald Schmidt, Current Planning Commission Alternate, to the Planning Commission - Resolution No. 10 -41 RESOLUTION NO. 10 -41 -- A RESOLUTION APPOINTING DONALD SCHMIDT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3.4 Approve an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Tigard - Tualatin School District for the City of Tigard's Participation in Year Three of the Safe Schools Grant and Authorize the City Manager to Sign the Agreement 3.5 Local Contract Review Board: a. Award Contract for Purchase of Two Chevrolet /Tahoe Police Vehicles through the State of Oregon Contract b. Award Contract for Pavement Management Program Pavement Overlay to Knife River Corporation • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council/City Center Development Agency has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF REVISED FINDINGS FOR THE URBAN FORESTRY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - CPA2008 -00002 APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: To re -adopt the Comprehensive Plan Amendment pertaining to Tigard's Urban Forest, subject to new findings of fact. LOCATION: Citywide ZONE: All City zoning districts APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Chapters Citizen Involvement, Land Use Planning, Natural Resources and Historic Areas, Environmental Quality; Hazards, Parks, Recreation, Trails & Open Space; Economic Development, Housing, Public Facilities and Services; Metro Functional Plan Titles 3 and 13; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10,11 and 13.. • Open Public Hearing • Review Hearing Procedures: City Attorney • Declarations: Does any Council member wish to declare or discuss a conflict of interest or abstention. • Staff Report • Public Testimony • Staff Recommendation • Council Discussion • Close Public Hearing • Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 10-11 ORDINANCE NO. 10-11 -- AN ORDINANCE READOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 2008 -00002 TO ADD GOALS, POLICIES, AND RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES PERTAINING TO STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 2, AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED iN ORDINANCE 08 -08. 5. RECEIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PERIODIC REVIEW UPDATE • Staff Report • Council Discussion 6. RECEIVE UPDATE ON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS • Staff Report • Council Discussion 7. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH A PLANNING COMMISSION SUBCOMMITEE AS THE DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND CONSIDER A RESOLUTION TO APPOINT MEMBERS • Staff Report • Council Discussion • Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 10 -12 and Resolution No. 10 -42 ORDINANCE NO. 10 -12 -- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.08 AUTHORIZING THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TO APPOINT A SUBCOMMITEE OF THE PLANNING COMMISION TO SERVE AS THE DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FOR THE OPTIONAL TYPE III -C DISCRETIONARY DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURE AS SPECIFIED IN THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 10 -42 -- A RESOLUTION APPOINTING PLANNING COMMISSIONER KAREN RYAN AND PLANNING COMMISSION ALTERNATES DONALD SCHMIDT AND RICHARD SHAVEY AS MEMBERS OF THE DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 8. CONSIDER WHETHER TO CALL A PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2010, FOR BOUNDARY CLARIFICATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF TIGARD AND THE TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT • Staff Report • Council Discussion • Council Consideration: Motion to set a public hearing to consider the proposed ordinance to withdraw territory from the Tualatin Valley Water District. 9. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 12. ADJOURNMENT Affidavit of Posting is attached for Ordinances No. 10 -1 1 and 10 -12. A d SeSSro f\ AIS -96 Business Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Presentation of the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Prepared By: Kathy Mollusky, Public Works Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Select One Information ISSUE Presentation of the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff requests comments on the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan and direction regarding presenting the plan for adoption. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY • In February 2007 the Council authorized the preparation of the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. • The project was to be integrated with Clean Water Services' update of the District Wide Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. • Tigard's master planning project examines the City's system capacity in more detail than the District wide study. • The study found: • Nine locations where the sewers are not large enough to handle the expected peak sewage flow. • Two areas of the City that have significant rainwater intrusion, which increases peak sewage flow and recommends rehabilitation projects in these areas. • Portions of the system are over 60 years old and are reaching the end of useful life. • The proposed plan recommends up- sizing pipes in nine locations. The City is responsible for five locations, while Clean Water Services is responsible for the rest. • The cost estimate for all improvements totals $14.2 million. The City is responsible for $3.6 million for capacity improvements on pipes that the City owns. Clean water services is responsible for the remaining $10.6 million. • The study also recommends that a system preservation plan be developed over the next five years to deal with the pipes that are reaching the end for their useful life. A copy of the Sewer Master Plan's executive summary is attached. A full copy of the plan is available from the City Engineer or at the Public Works Department. OTHER ALTERNATIVES None COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS This master planning project established the capacity related sanitary sewer improvement needs for the next five years and forecasts sewer capacity needs to serve the City at buildout. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: The City should consider budgeting $3.6 million in sewer system improvements over the next five years in future capital improvement plan budgets. The current budget does not include any of the projects recommended in this plan because this plan has not been adopted. There is sufficient time to add these projects to the budget next fiscal year through the normal budgeting process. There are no immediate impacts to the current budget by adopting this plan. w.._. Attachments Exec Summery Sewer Master Plan Presentation on Sewer Master Plan CITY OF TIGARD I Sanitary Sewer Master Plan May 2010 MO . Ite.t,crina \ Illn •,... !C(Ir • I SC I ■ ,' • ••• t I ' V ' 14.4 : I I ' 84 , 9' ' }2 l'arf Lauf -_ •-i ,1111 ki— .. i ;',., 1 1 1 7 - .,.r., P * —',.._,-- b z e , rw q • 10‘ ---- ..,. ,1, s< 1 / 00 101 q II irt ir , i -,.= r . ...a. ,2 loi2AIIIMMI 867 / A" — - 4 0 : ( 14 884 .1 K1 r, 4 , N63 - 819 R6 I i Ili as • ... • ...: 90" L..... 913 I ..■ .■ ; 941•1 : q : q“:', ■ ' I ....... 910 ` . • 100# , toiti iotr, 9 A 1, I , j I • 4 •M: ' ' .......11 1., 9 71711 ./.1 I J .0e 1126 I 0 1 11 '14 . I , . 1 2 . dr• r I '13 ri 81= la X: i 894 a O I ■ 1 r . 16. 9.19.....ast I ake Os;; cg; ■••," I I I s$e7 1.1 7 . I .1. / 9.11 101x R93 I II • It,,, ( 11$ • I• 1 - 4 _ki4 C4 I ' • m.• aft. . I do' .1' . ..... WEST Y 0 S T I I. ,* I IA ., •■•• ...VI.. *25 .... , III° Pe rm. '4■• ASSOCIATES \ PON 1arliam n 1. . . 1t 1 TIGARD City of Tigard Sanitary Sewer Master Plan May 2010 WEST Y O S T I I bA ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers 517- 03 -06 -14 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Tigard (City) provides sanitary sewer service to over 47,000 residents through a cooperative agreement with Clean Water Services (District). The Durham Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility (AWWTF) operated by the District treats all wastewater from Tigard and discharges to the Tualatin River. Under the City's agreement with the District, the City maintains and operates collection system gravity sewers smaller than 24- inches in diameter. The City holds overall responsibility for planning public infrastructure needed by existing and planned residents and businesses, and thereby shares responsibility for overall wastewater collection system planning with the District. Figure ES -1 shows the current City limits and adjacent areas, the current Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), and the current District boundary. In addition, Figure ES -1 depicts the study area boundary for this Sanitary Sewer Master Plan (Master Plan), which defines the area for which wastewater collection system capacity needs have been evaluated. Figure ES -1 also depicts the Sewer Reimbursement Districts established by the City to fund certain improvements. This Master Plan provides a prediction of current and future wastewater flows, and identifies the pipeline and pump station improvements needed to serve the project study area. The major topics covered in this Executive Summary include: • Regulatory Setting • Overview of Master Planning Process • Sanitary Flows • Conclusions and Recommendations • Next Steps REGULATORY SETTING Oregon Water Quality Standards, administered by the Department of Environmental Quality, set forth two conditions restricting sanitary sewer overflows based on bacterial standards for waters of the State. The standards generally prohibit raw sewage discharges to waters of the State, except during a storm event greater than the one -in -five -year, 24 -hour duration storm during the period of November 1 through May 21, and during a storm event greater than the one -in- ten -year, 24 -hour duration storm during the period of May 22 through October 31. The regulations do not prescribe a required methodology for planning collection system capacity improvements. This Master Plan applies to City collection system planning the same planning practices employed by the District in its recently adopted master plan update. This document includes recommendations for additional efforts to further evaluate the anticipated actions needed to ensure conformance to the Oregon Water Quality Standards. West Yost —May 2010 ES -1 City of Tigard 517- 03 -06 -14 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan r, a h ae -- near .. - - - .. N - ...tb}_R 80 040 a > m tT Px/ IX ��. _ —_. faaErtrto SW 1 414 R„ • } wnnn Or 3 ¢ 5 'N ,5 At : < 1 ( a -; c4 • P R IdadSWesa - f d e s I m EW Lvaal bt ; < ssdn`- S n e 5 L p < SW Gasenef Rd , e Cg �W '; y . X SO Siwan m cA _ s t sw Atari dAtari s g s -.........• > ' .... <. SW Car Si f*s. h Ett - f a _ e ,� , IN( 0 • > 4 SW agrc;k(, , �< 5W r '�e°rast m � N a 0 syl 0.rhd•MM 0W S1naQ �1W f b EW Al " Al rAn.oaseEa'�o p. 3 , s r n sw nN a . q [ , 4 3/.1 d P €� SW Nero A`b�� s ....,, ,, SW &ndnocair«er m P u se sW Flaenn t agar - 7= y 6 Nero Ra SW Read Rd I 3 ,f', < • 3 SW Kamer Rd ` y + _ - 8'eaverton 1 �# aent c 1 * g S t twent r..... � s�m - i' q" t' f;•l� ry° ':w ' n i t f 2 1 I I e �, - ,'s tn,,,r Le I se. Nmaaew ., *ry SW fluty : t hm,nt <+ aaef It X S1 > - .. EWWev,Sd ro y 1 ' In ? 5+ �Eu�si Ati . i1�/Nand . i � a 1i ..... Dais SIT d:p a g. � � � r S e y c Co m• , ••.�yy SW LOOM S ' s y0«mi - SW 0 * ' r # bi►L«v.. si l 'W 'T'{t ;I s y r.r�4!�,G y � ' � i 3 00 4 • ..:. Oat sr ro ! sw Rn Si � a ° n fi err ooneeeb M r -e f . . SWp0�6nebl sa ,1 AV yy RI SW a/ - • • ___.........10., t , '��. �. � Srt ..::� GS! c; . , esia El A ! o' 1 - i r r s ty tg•ta x E 4 § 2 4 ; f a $ sw 8N y" ,, 4 _ E e' t + J"' �'OrM+re St °alum widths St ��. A i �0 ry I'M i p o a �a C ,l e v z 1- d ;m 4 SuRnamdn�81 a n Ir -' eb yro as ._. sW Noted St Cvi =v �' lm 3 . r y SW ar�n In S7 St '3 y SW Xa1Mr,M & ' :3 y '' 1 . 'ti Y , ' aan ? ,e 0 a >J1re 0' 4' ' ' '' 0,2 C ,neap a r < RO °'' _ -_ EK a. � r ;91 r I e a m o ` -- _ * a z «mR�.9n 0,4R d m «,e tr '�irr f - ,c _ - _rEnsrw - 1 4, sl - i bW r"." ,11 E � # Want Rd a c L ' 42 ' . J co Tlga 5 b %Et 1 4, ,. m 3 ¢ , „rEtR� 4i ''.4.E 'A i /( W Om y i t r F n.`+nl - ,. „ k BS , A r 4 a O t •mS. a' . te a s,' Os a � r .: %1/6 .' I ' L g . , c ' F � @ 7- ° 4 'w an »�a � ,A l°• 3 E g _ � ' t p I _ j � ! °�M iy r � �Y w a f n _ .. r �} 'fr I R° f tti•� @ SI A. ... _ •' a arF wswe wAr aA,aoe 4 s9 a �r • I _ ma a - -.-• �i ' � -.. di c* - :.4 +A LM T ,/ 4. i rr r ii____ , E 91SI M Rd h _ M s �+'' a :c • i - :r j� -, a 5} e °.�...._:. -. ..,.. S - BanR.R ,t 1� o N ! �1 " " .� t;,��; lot .. - EM Rnr e eeo k0 � `r te ' d . ' L a 3 ; : • " � j J 0 • d • d . a � S'E :baaw & t e I r ' ee m: o �.,.i y G » � d > ,� .l. t ; ' 4 E JV : INO: dtwEAVE 4 �' X '" e • SW Wo SW.e $1 • . r IF D - IM f O AAJJ e S w A L G k Rd s^ g AM9ra i g g / L ( ` . n In 3 n !, 5� ,R ,, X nd p 9 4WXaNe m t n I f • i '- 8 { . trl au ? King eky w M A«d bw 9eda 91 j _ _ _ _ . W Durham Rd ` -. � 3 , y =s.- / n+wnpaN°t. m ' aae.rd� 914 I May 2010 yr R'.. -t'" s" ,( • ✓^. 'P ` wE •, DMaf Rd EMpEE so CITY OF TIGARD i Rn e need t° E: w f>R ." �l v„ Rd t N. u SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN ,5R�Oh>d 1 .� i ' ' - .�, Dr L. 9 TIGARD FIGURE ES -1 STUDY AREA " ' i ..,m 1 p - . .Ra,eA,,,m ? ``� °+""°"? `«�a w 1ia:gMna Re 3g oYft Rd 's L!� 4 � , Durham 3 � < � ' � ` 'L R av�+`ni" od�R . r Q a•.r wr.r s•r.k•, n•a:n sw,.,aerr N / �3 R„„ry E • ; «eM _ - r_ 1 • 0 „a. o- 0 a rG. - - - ua bNn , ! ; «yr,n Rd CeW. ood bi R, � / � Pm W "m A550 wtlo� O — —T 4 5w Biers Rd , - O s °d j „ WIll YOST 11ui,Sr,r no SW tuatnin Rd r, Sewer aa,n.•.m•r• DRAMs r - j E.2008.. Mr. ,.... ,. K 7 Darn Ave n 'tla6� in STATOR nmro-n ° 0.3 D.E s _- - f -_. - sr IIII COMPLETE •, �ROPRO,Er:r WAS z,...,, a �� sw e,,,, •D �' l�' _._. nos •o -- Chidr a Q n 9 111. CRAMPED NO PRE-PRC.UAA a nJ+ i rf 4r0PnA OVERVIEW OF MASTER PLANNING PROCESS The first step in the Master Plan update process was to establish a study area that encompasses the area of the City's responsibility for providing sewer service. The City's Master Plan employs the District's computer model of the sanitary sewer system. The model was recently updated first by adding 10 -inch diameter and larger sewers constructed subsequent to the District's last update, and then by adding conceptual future trunk sewers extending into the growth areas. None of the District's planned sewer extensions are within the Tigard study area; however, flows from outlying growth areas will impact District trunk sewers that traverse the City. The basis of sanitary flows simulated in the model was updated to reflect current land use information on a parcel -by- parcel basis. The land use update was based on information provided by the City and other member agencies, or by Metro in areas upstream of Tigard sewers where city- specific land use information was not available. Sanitary flows from significant industrial discharges (including process flows) were updated using current flow records and permit flow limits. Sanitary flows from all other areas were obtained by application of sanitary flow factors on a parcel -by- parcel basis based on the land -use category assigned to the parcel. This work resulted in estimates of current -day sanitary flows and projections of future flows. Flow metering tailored to assess wet weather infiltration and inflow (I &I) within the Tigard study area was conducted in 2007 through 2009. This data allowed for a more detailed calibration of the peak wet weather flows simulated in the computer model. Following completion of these updates, the computer model was used to simulate existing and future flow conditions within the sanitary sewer system, and to identify those locations where the existing pipe capacity may not be adequate. For each identified location, a ranking system was used to determine where improvements are warranted. The necessary improvements, along with future extensions of the collection system, were then described and documented to serve as a guide for annual capital improvement planning and extension of service to growth areas. SANITARY FLOWS The land use -based flow predictions of the computer model do not explicitly use population as a basis. However, the population implicit in the modeled wastewater flows may be estimated from the modeled average dry weather flow (ADWF). Specifically, by assuming a fixed flow per person value (67 gallons per person per day, in the case of this Master Plan), the portion of the modeled ADWF attributed to residential uses can be translated into an approximate population. The aggregate flow at the Durham AWWTF is not directly relevant to City sewer planning since the plant serve substantial areas outside the City's study area. However, the estimated implied population for the year 2006 and buildout conditions at the Durham AWWTF help characterize, for future comparisons, the collection system planning that served as the basis of the City's Master Plan. Therefore, Table ES -1 summarizes the total acreage and flow, the residential portion of flow, and an estimated population value for the treatment plant based on the residential portion of flow. West Yost —May 2010 ES -3 City of Tigard 517- 03 -06 -14 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Table ES -1. Implied Population for Durham AWWTF Service Area (2006 Model and Buildout Model) Approximate Modeled Modeled Population Service Total Modeled Residential Based on Modeled Area ADWF, Portion of Residential Condition Acreage mgd ADWF, mgd ADWF 2006 21,911 19.0 12.2 181,580(1') (c) Buildout 27,325 38.7 22.2 331,100 Current (2009): Not City of Tigard 7,600 estimated 3.2 47,460 (a) Includes all residential land use categories and mixed use commercial categories. (b) Estimated based on a wastewater generation rate of 67 gallons per capita per day. (c) This approximate value is about two percent lower than the reported population for 2004 of 185,887, based on previous facilities planning by the District, indicating a good correlation between the modeled average flow and actual population. (d) Based on 11.8 square miles within the City limits. (e) Modeled service areas are based on pipe configurations and therefore cross City limits. Modeled flows from inside and outside the City are intermingled so a separate estimate for total ADWF exclusive to the city was not developed. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The findings of this Master Plan are presented in Chapters 4, 5 and 6 of this report. The contents of these three chapters are summarized as follows: Chapter 4. Collection System Evaluation Chapter 4 presents the modeling results and recommended improvements for existing gravity sewer facilities. A ranking condition based on modeled flow versus capacity for each modeled pipe is illustrated on large format maps (Plates 1 through 3). Each improvement is described and depicted on a Project Data Sheet. The various Project Data Sheets are included at the end of Chapter 4. A Sample Project Data Sheet is included in this Executive Summary. Chapter 5. System Maintenance Program Chapter 5 provides an overview of current City maintenance practices. Maintenance performance standards are summarized. The chapter includes a recommendation to initiate an asset management program for the wastewater collection system in order to determine long -term funding needs for preserving the integrity of the collection system. West Yost —May 2010 ES -4 City of Tigard 517- 03 -06 -14 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan SAMPLE PROJECT DATA SHEET PROJECT - Shore Drive Trunk Project ID: D-530 Base Construction Cost 193,000 NOTES: Available data indicates this is an 8-inch sewer at substandard slope (0.002 N0): slope and diameter should be field verified. Location: Runs northeast from north of Amu St. Modeled existing peak flows significantly exceed capacity, although outflows are not predicted. The tributary area is substantial. and additional 8-inch sewers upstream of MH 58224 to Wilton Ave. and possibly beyond may be similarly impacted because they Treatment Plant Basin: Durham Contingency (30 %) 57,900 carry much of the flow present in the modeled segments. Upstream sewers should be evaluated before or during preliminary design Jurisdiction: Tigard Construction Budget Amount 251.000 for this project. LocaVRegione: - Engl7serig & Administration (25 %) 83,000 Brief Description: Upsize -1,050 fl of 8 -inch diameter sanitary sewer to 12 -inch diameter sanitary sewer. CaplW Impressment Cost Totall'h 110,000 Ill Cad rernaee. ENR CCI -8002 avenge o120 Caws. Novawber 2008 Base Condition Bu0dout Construction Rating (yr) Existing Full-pipe Peak Flows, mgd HGL Rank Peaking Upsize Unit Cost (wto Model Manhole IDs Diameter. Existing Capacity, Existing Ratio. Diameter. Depth, Length. Cost, Contingency), G ID USMH_DSMH inches Slope mgd (2006) 2015 Buildout Existing 2015 Buildoul PH /ADWF inches It ft E Unit S 8121 58224 57262 8 0.0020 0.35 0.73 0.75 0.79 IS IS HS 4.7 12 18.4 239 188 ft 45,000 Special Considerations: NA 8119 27262_58900 8 0.0020 0.35 0.73 0.75 0.79 IS IS IS 4.7 12 19.4 272 208 fl 58,000 8117 58900_58588 8 0.0020 0.35 0.73 0.75 0.79 IS IS IS 4.7 12 18.0 334 186 ft 82,000 21702 8002 58508 13805 8 0.0020 0.35 0.73 0.75 0.79 IS IS IS 4.7 12 9.8 203 147 ft 30,000 HAWKS BEARDI ST dt _ _ 211399. 6.63/44E12L1L4- N+rON OR • ,3869 D-335 , 85 - a e 13668 .+..5� 4C 'eR L8. 0U , 13070 16238 118 58Q 2,- 13 t3880 -_L._' / _. 900 VS 982 13878 __ ______ // �r.F IELD C/ S3f 13877 p 'N el.' a 7262 81 O, 0 „ • 224 ,99 980 13876 �� _ _ 0 ' 4 SHSURy LN ' 0: -. ti '4, 13875 I Tl p aarit ,0 a, . 19978 FR ( AK DR PEIPING LN e 74 ? 0 , 58098 Ln13RMD '57259 u 13873' 5859 s owe 1997 N 7 - ••. • 70 4 • 6.1 a I - . KAIHERIf4S ST "' 19971 -Q OM a - .. Ms y ta W w = EiP ::::.. c ¢ 19977 ® vu i rel. etewy a aw < S w j S ' s e. L? ww 0� ewm Arva ' i s - - - 57497 L -. �• ' ~ 21085 566 90 ..Oman. /PA } - 21086 8, ProNet Driver ❑ Residential development (in area l ❑ Industrial development ❑ HighM ❑ Pump station upgrade IIII ►� a ASSOCIA1e, TGARDT West Yost - May 2010 City of Tigard 517 -03 -06-14 Samtan' Sewer Master Plan Chapter 6. Capital Improvement Cost Summary Chapter 6 provides a capital improvement program (CIP) summarizing the recommended projects and estimated costs. Costs are allocated to either the City, the District, or both in accordance with the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). A preliminary allocation of costs to be funded by system development charges is also included. Table ES -2 presents a summary of costs for the planned projects. The costs account for upsizing in existing gravity sewers needed to accommodate anticipated growth, as well as infiltration and inflow abatement for the Commercial Street area. Project cost estimates exclude land acquisition, financing, and inflation. The costs include a 30 percent contingency based on the level of planning, as well as a 25 percent allowance for engineering and administration. Costs are presented in current dollars for late 2009, but do not likely fully capture the effects of unusual economic conditions and bidding climates that can dramatically affect construction costs. The conceptual alignments and preliminary sizing presented herein for upsizing existing facilities will be refined through the normal planning and design processes. It is understood that the City and the District will conduct additional project- specific planning and design activities, and in the future will periodically update their respective master plans. Through these activities, the City may identify collection system improvements different from, or in addition to, those presented in this report or the District's plan. Differences could arise from more detailed alignment studies, additional flow analysis and calibration, or identified non - capacity- related deficiencies. Differences between City and District planning will be considered through the work of the CIP Prioritization Committee. Differing master planning conclusions regarding the need for, priority of, or description of a project will be resolved through review of prior analyses and documentation of actual flows. West Yost —May 2010 ES -6 City of Tigard 517- 03 -06 -14 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Table ES -2. Capital Improvement Program Planned Total Capital Cost, dollars Approximate Pipe All Funding Sources District Share City Share Length, Diameter, Near -Term Future SDC SDC Project ID Description feet inches Projects Projects Funded Local Funded Local I &I Commercial St. Area (Tributary to MH 19993, NW of Hwy 99W; see Figure 2 -4); 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Abatement approximately 100 acres; area may be adjusted based on condition assessment data. Assume $40,000 /acre, including contingency, eng. and admin. (2 year budget) Commercial Correct sag from MH 19987 to 19988 (City MH SSO2A010 to -012); identified by City staff. 358 10 90,000 90,000 Street Sag Consider upsizing per Table 4 -2 of this master plan; however, upsizing a single segment will have little benefit; recommended as part of more extensive replacement. D-120 Eastjard Trunk (replacement, upsize from 12 -inch) 1,470 15 351,000 156,000 195,000 D -130 72nd Avenue Lateral (divert flow to Bonita Trunk at 72nd Ave.; cost represents an allowance) 60 10 200,000 - 200,000 _D -330 Scholl Trunk (replacement, upsize from 27- inch); serves growth outside City of Tigard 3,343 42 4,100,000 2,800,000 1,300,000 D -335 Scholl Trunk (replacement, upsize from 27- inch); serves growth outside City of Tigard 1,853 42 2,160,000 1,370,000 790,000 D -340 Metzger Interceptor (replacement, upsize from 30 -inch) 714 36 353,000 151,000 202,000 D- 350/351 Elmwood Lateral / Locust Street Re -Route (redirects portion of flow from existing 21 -inch) 6,330 18/21 1,983,000 1,360,000 623,000 Note: District Project. Diameter and length is for relief sewer, parallel to existing. SDC split at percentage based on Appendix I. D -410 SW Katherine Lateral (replacement, upsize from 12 -inch) 1,465 15 389,000 175,000 214,000 D -525 128th Avenue Lateral (replacement, upsize from 8 -inch) 1,175 10 320,000 143,000 177,000 D -530 Shore Drive Trunk (replacement, upsize from 8 -inch) 1,048 12 314,000 207,000 107,000 Total (including one year of annual budget line- items) 3,411,000 10,849,000 5,681,000 4,915,000 681,000 2,983,000 Notes: (1) Costs include 30% Project Contingency and 25% Engineering & Administration. (2) Costs for Special Considerations included. (3) Totals are rounded. (4) Project descriptions based on model calibration for Tigard area subsequent to Clean Water Services Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. West Yost - May 2010 City of Tigard 517- 13 -06 -14 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan NEXT STEPS The City's ongoing sanitary sewer system management and planning activities will build on the analysis and conclusions of this Master Plan. These activities may include the following: 1. I &I Analysis in the Downtown (Commercial Street) Area: Significant infiltration and inflow from the area tributary to the Commercial Street sewer is evident from flow metering. This Master Plan includes a recommended I &I abatement project for the area based on the tributary area boundary. Additional field work within the downtown area, such as smoke testing, could help identify the areas most likely to contribute excessive I &I, and might reveal point sources of inflow that could be corrected relatively easily. 2. Evaluation of Additional Wet Weather Conditions: Regulatory requirements are • changing with respect to sanitary sewer overflows and the theoretical wet weather conditions considered to be adequate for assessing the likelihood of outflows. Additional modeling using more severe simulated storms could be used in a sensitivity analysis to determine what additional facilities may have risk of outflows under the larger storms. 3. Prioritization of Collection System Improvements: The City participates in the District -wide CIP Prioritization Committee, and through that committee will implement a priority ranking system for collection system improvements. This Master Plan focuses on capacity, relative to existing and anticipated flows, which is an important consideration in the project ranking process. The ranking should also take into account other factors important to the City, such as opportunities to combine sewer improvements with other infrastructure replacements or redevelopment, maintenance needs, structural repair needs, and basin infiltration and inflow rehabilitation. Prioritization is dynamic. This Master Plan will be used as a tool during the periodic project prioritization procedures. Over the course of time, projects identified herein may be modified or eliminated, and additional projects may be added. 4. Collection System Model Refinement: The City anticipates that the District will maintain and upgrade the collection system model because it must reflect the influence of many areas outside the City's planning area. A number of recommended model refinement activities are under consideration by the District. Model refinement in response to facility construction and development, or to take advantage of evolving modeling technologies and data improvements, may be warranted. This Master Plan relied heavily on collection system configuration data compiled in the 1990s for the District, supplemented by data from recent projects. Improved and updated data are identified on a regular basis. 5. Periodic Master Plan Updates: Periodic updates to the Master Plan are anticipated, with the next update anticipated in 2015. Such updates will be necessary to refine sizing and conceptual alignments for long -term projects, and to reflect evolving planning. Significant land use changes or additional calibration work could trigger the need for special studies or accelerate the need for a full update. West Yost —May 2010 ES -8 City of Tigard 517- 03 -06 -14 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan 6. System Preservation Program: The oldest portions of the City's collection system have reached a life of nearly 60 years. As the system ages beyond the 50 -year mark, structural failures should be expected with increased frequency. Some sewers will last 100 years or more without failures, while others could fail much sooner. Over time, the City will need to fund ongoing renewal and replacement to preserve the structural integrity of the collection system. An asset management program that uses TV inspection data already being collected and information about pipe age and material should be used to predict the long -term funding needs for system preservation. West Yost —May 2010 ES -9 City of Tigard 517- 03 -06 -14 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET 10/26/2010 FOR • 1 D • ap t (DATE OF MEETING) , S-9j,k.rkx- Clean Water Services , C Sewer System Master Operates collection C Provides treatment system (pipes up to Owns and operates pipe Plan ") over 24 inch and larger Does utility billing Coordinates CIP Council Presentation Responsible for system Sets maintenance integrity standards August 10, 2010 Provides for system Sets technical standards extensions Sets the sewer service rates City - Local Services CWS Regional Services The Sewer System Master Plan Scope , f;�_W : 1 r T / X k- °• I Cr"F; 1 It -k • Clean Water Act Requirements `� � _:,. ‘ . - No overflows due to inadequate capacity ' ' , t- 71 i } • Assess capacity needs . ' � 4 . . c �4 . • Assess areas where rain water intrusion L T { . 4 44 is high r "` , • Not covered : \ n,6r- . ' { of - • System preservation and replacement :° °°vz...°.°° ' e' t' P t : I�o =_: , r jay,. Capacity Findings Capacity Finding CWS • Capacity sites (City responsibility) • CWS Projects East Tigard Trunk 72nd Avenue Lateral SW Katherine lateral Scholl Trunk 1 28th avenue lateral Metzger Interceptor Shore Drive Trunk - Elmwood Lateral ■ Cost Estimate • Cost Estimate: 1.7 Million S 10.6 million 1 10/26/2010 East Tigard Trunk Shore Drive Project ! ...,. , -.1........... . . . .,.. :". •••• ,... , , ,i ZZ.... . I:L..7 1 Rain Water Intrusion Areas Rainwater Intrusion SI ' • ,--: ri f im ' o Cost Estimate: ., 1 ---; ■ $2.0 million City ,. , f ,---' . r , - • $2.0 million District / Irr. — .. . j i ri aZion sows awnstrum I ' — riz =lam. oainsor f iiha- ...n.-- ■ yiii /-- - '''' r---,:- System Preservation 5 Year Cost Estimate Summary ■ System is aging parts over 60 years old City investment Est. Cost • System length in millions 873,000 feet (165 miles) Capacity Improvements $1.7 Replacement value in 2010 dollars Rainwater intrusion Rehabilitation 2.0 • System Preservation 9.0 $90 million • Annual investment to replace over 50 Total $127 years $1.8 million 2 10/26/2010 Moving Forward ■ Continue operations System preservation analysis ■ Adopt the plan • CWS CIP Process ■ City CIP process ■ Project completion ■ System preservation 3 S d c't S ess iOk, AIS -37 Business Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Presentation of the Water System Master Plan Prepared By: Kathy Mollusky, Public Works Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Select One Information ISSUE This is a presentation of the Water System Master Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Informational briefing. Provide direction to staff. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY In July 9, 2009, the Council authorized the preparation of the Water System Master Plan. Tigard's Water System Master Plan is a 20 -year plan that examines the water system infrastructure and its ability to deliver water to Tigard Water Service Area customers. This Master Plan analyzes existing system, forecasts demand projections, and integrates the joint water supply with Lake Oswego. The Master Plan recommends two projects that will integrate the joint water supply with Lake Oswego, one project to extend long -term water supply and one project for fire flow deficiencies in the Canterbury Hill area. A copy of the Water System Master Plan's executive summary is attached. A full copy of the plan is available from the City Engineer or at the Public Works Department. OTHER ALTERNATIVES None COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS We are presenting the Water System Master Plan for approval at a Council meeting in September. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: The City should consider budgeting $9.6 million in water system improvements over the next five years in future capital improvement plan budgets. The current budget includes some of the recommended projects but does not include all. Therefore, adopting of this Master Plan will allow sufficient time to add these projects through the normal budgeting process. There are no immediate impacts to the current budget by adopting this plan. The $9.6 million will be funded through water rates and SDC fees and charges. These additional revenue requirements have been loaded into the water financial plan revenue requirement model presented to Council on July 20, 2010. , Attachments Exec Summary Water Master Plan CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WATER MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Water System Master Plan is an update to the City of Tigard's (City's) 2000 Water System Master Plan. This plan was developed to satisfy the Oregon Health Division (OHD) water master plan requirements as outlined in Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 333 -61- 060. This Executive Summary briefly summarizes the contents of each chapter in the plan, including major activities, conclusions, and recommendations. ES.1 CHAPTER 1 — EXISTING SYSTEM Chapter 1 summarizes the existing water system including a description of the Tigard Water Service Area (TWSA), the supply sources, existing infrastructure, and general operations. System Overview The City of Tigard supplies potable water to approximately 57,500 people. The Tigard Water Service Area (TWSA) is approximately 13 square miles and includes the majority of the City of Tigard, the Tigard Water District, and the Cities of Durham and King City, as shown in Figure ES.1. The City's water distribution system consists of five major pressure zones, separated by pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations, as shown in Figures ES.2 and ES.3. The 550 -foot elevation pressure zone is comprised of several sub -zones that are not physically connected, but share the same hydraulic grade line. Water Supply The City has water purchase agreements with the Cities of Portland and Lake Oswego, and has emergency supplies from the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD), Joint Water Commission (JWC), City of Beaverton and Lake Grove Water District. In 2007, the Cities of Tigard and Lake Oswego completed a Joint Water Supply (JWS) System Analysis to evaluate joint supply options. Based on the results of the analysis, the two cities are pursuing a joint supply effort, which will result in the City purchasing up to 14 mgd from the City of Lake Oswego as soon as 2016. With the new JWS, the City will no longer rely on the City of Portland supply. In addition to purchasing water, the City owns and operates one groundwater well and two Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) wells to supplement existing water supplies during periods of high water demand. A third ASR well has already been drilled, but is not yet equipped. Existing Infrastructure The City's system encompasses approximately 250 miles of pipelines, fourteen reservoirs with a combined capacity of 27.4 million gallons (MG), seven pump stations, and twenty -one pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations. At the time of writing this report, the City is beginning construction of the Pump Station 10 expansion, serving the 550G Pressure Zone, and has constructed a temporary eighth pump station, serving the 550C Pressure Zone. The system is monitored and controlled by a central supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. CAROLLO ENGINEERS ES -1 Final — May 10 pwJ /Carollo /Documents /CI ient/O R/iig and /8287A00/De I iverables /Executive_Su m m ary.docx I Legend i L. *fr. r WA S HI NGTO N -1. E:;Tugard City Limits -1 ,. ' COUNTY LI Water Service Area I Ts... Tual atin Valley _ ----- ,2 I 1:=1 Tigard VVater S ery lc e Area =Tigard sAlater 8 mice In TVWD Water District i - --‘/ 1 [7_3 Cty Limits : : _ BEAVERTON r , 'Washington County I I ',',,, City of Beaverton P 0 RTLA N , Water D istrict 4.41 0 CIO/ Of Portland i - -- 0. r f alatin variey I Water District I Er—lj r" i - I t ..i 1 DIstlet #21 u: i Nit ri --F.-F-- 1 ! ICIA1151 , Seuetwoee Park aterlt TIGAR a J I I :, !Enid ...11 • 4 , 4, 4 41 - - • - , ip.11-.1, ..—.1 r..3Z: 4, -, ■ v... , - , I ...' L'• 'Al; ri , 1,- ", • J J r ........._ ( 1 City of Lake Oswego 1 Pi 9 J ,... - LAKE OSWEGO IN,- • - ,- ... fi WASHINGTON Tigard Water District I , grs' - t LAM OM. . .1 1 / District #15 DUF. 4D ,3 ,14' • rkiF ......-'-'..-- i . .._.._ KING CITY ' •• / fo p - . t y ALATI t 1 I DURHA F / i , 1 1..1" e lf' , .,, FIGURE ES.1 „, . .. . l''' i ..L r - WATER SERVICE AREA .,,,,,,,,,z ,, °4 '' ,1 1, - • '. - 1 46 :_ ' ERGRa yet 4 r . WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 0 629,250 2,500 3,750 5 000 :i • ,:' CITY OF TIGARD 1 c C ,- :-' Njk , • , ,.,t,, 7 -- ---.. ---4 -"? -, ,_. ~ , , elailE Feet '' .4_.''' , .* - 144. 1 "If4v ' . ei .,0, 1 ,-, : ..°'//°‘ I Legend .. — ii +r (' {# 1 i M re s. �Tfgard City Limits 4 , \ ('�� , t i 4 ERPi l �l ii,� f =Tigard Water Service Area �e r e, OTigard Water Service In TVWD ' f - ! ' .fir, �� rardnii ® Emergency I ma ties rii g l Mk I �� M � � D Supplies 1� a I . � ._ .._- ( ! A4ERTON -� �l ` f:fl•J!� r 19 Tank ` ` Jfril�frla 'U/ g � Pressure Zones i g oo I King City E Pump Durham %J1 ---7—*-,-- 7 4/ , s1.44 / 410 530 IN 550D ES 13 5500 550E PR550C - 1 093 830 550E F 550F 6508 m V IN 550G RES8- t� E ` l f MI 550H PRr �a271a RES a -, 640 -640 PRtF�oa1 Er? '8 it P 0431 ��.. �P501 -7 ..... © LACE 0S" 713 ® PR PRF 1'� P.ES 1 -1 RE;:12 P96 I IM+ , 830 RRU5&JG.2 E' 030 f 'i / ®W Bull Mtn PAU5 �1 PRUSQN1- ,�PRb-S50C -1 , �` W Bull rvtn RU5S 1S 2 lSi3OG ' "r � �r 550A 550H - I r � �� f f OROVE -1 ' 0 •^ ;� (' Ki ng City 1 � �.,� �` i • ° 4 rte— 4• N c ; TU l N_1 L 410 n Durham �mrl' 411 I i NE _ FIGURE ES.2 � I j WATER SYSTEM MAP n WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 0 629,256 2,500 3,750 5,000 1 �{,--,� / II /� / � ` t1 :-� T - �;j CITY OF TIGARD Feet hr i 1) 830 ZONE LEGEND EXISTING DESCRIPTION MINIM PRESSURE ZONE (HGL) 800' — PIPE ## © METER 4---/A pill gp iP PUMP STATION 8 PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE STATION ® CLOSED VALVE O PU P PUMPCAPACrry / 713 / 713 \ / 713 " — 713ZONE CC AQUIFER STORAGE/ RESERVOIR RESERVOIR IN RESERVOIR 700'— 8- -1 8-2 8 RECOVERY WELL 1 — r XXX RESERVOIR RESERVOIR Vnrary W a YY 2.2- RESERVOIR CAPACITY u M. A § .g 840 ci PORTLAND lo+al a g a g ' > 1 a a O. i a o w v g g � 600' — — 600' nWC SUPPLY MO) © 5508 550C 550A 5500 550E 550H 550G " 550 \ 550G RESERVOIR ■ a o MG PROPOSED cc �O O _Q O :O : Q PUMP STATION 500' — Q 10 EXPANSION w 1 VAU 00' T © WATER 05(501 fM1..) 470 R u nRE PROPOSED RESERVOIR p PUMP _0 -O PUMP oMO rn PRCErvcr STATION 13 STATION 12 PUM ' g © o 1 r�TERnelASs STATION 2 G O _ o . P UMP TION £ UALATIN Iris) p r. �alol © ' t fY 8 - 0 STA 1 i w ©© T vCREZNy en.). © A ¢ I ] p M UI RG 417 413 l 415 NTE 410ZONE 412 413 410 410 L 410ZONE RESERVOIR RESERVOIR RESERVOIR RESERVOIR srnO RESERVOIR RES 9 OIR RESERVOIR - q RESERVOIR RESERVOIR 400' s 13 3 - c 1'0 MC o.ze MC r 1 - 1 - 1.0 MG 1.1 HG - 400' z sync ern 'o MG 1.1.0 PUMP STATION 11 1, l J ' P P O STATION TI ^ ATION 5 WE FIGURE ES.3 © '' °EOSGO 300'— EXISTING SYSTEM HYDRAULIC PROFILE WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN ELEVATION CITY OF TIGARD caroI10 CApw WorkIngWrolecMiselanIgandms90903 %Figure 1 Hydraulic Profile 331 -10 08:43am RLenlgan % REFS: Erginews...WOMing Wonders WM Wafer" • CITY oP TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.2 CHAPTER 2 - POPULATION & DEMANDS Chapter 2 summarizes the historical and projected population and demands for the City's water system. Historical & Projected Population Historical population estimates were based on the number of water service accounts and an average number of persons per account. Population projections combined the future population of the current service area using projections established by Metro's 2035 Transportation Analysis Zone Forecast Allocation, additional development anticipated in the Tigard Urban Renewal and Washington Square Regional Center (not reflected in Metro's data), and the additional West Bull Mountain service area. The total projected population is shown in Table ES.1. Table ES.1 Projected Population Year Metro's Additional West Bull Total Population Downtown Mountain Projections' Development 2005 54,757 - - 54,757 2010 57,649 75 - 57,724 2015 60,542 149 - 60,692 2020 63,435 224 2,959 66,618 2025 66,327 299 5,918 72,545 2030 69,220 374 8,877 78,471 Notes: 1. Estimates are based on Metro's Data Resource Center number of households for 2005 and 2035. Estimated number of households between 2005 and 2035 were interpolated in five -year increments assuming linear growth. 2. Population projections for the downtown development assume development begins in 2010 and grows linearly to 1,000 dwelling units by 2030. Some areas of development occur outside the water service area boundary; populations in these areas are not included. 3. Population projections for West Bull Mountain assume development begins in 2015 and grows linearly to build -out to 3,843 dwelling units by 2035. This number of dwelling units is the average of two possible build -out capacities. Historical & Projected Demands In addition to historical population, historical water use data from 2004 to 2008 were used to establish the City's water use patterns, including per capita demands and peaking factors. Though the population has increased, total water usage has generally decreased from 2004 to 2008. The resulting average per capita water demand is 110 gallons per capita per day (gpcd), with a peak day peaking factor of 2.1. Diurnal use patterns established a peak hour peaking factor of 1.7. The projected average day demand (ADD) was calculated by multiplying the future population by the historical per capita water demand, as presented in Table ES.2. CAROLLO ENGINEERS ES-5 Final — May 10 pw: / /Carollo/ Documents / Client /ORITigard /8287A00/ Deliverables /Executive_Summary .docx CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table ES.2 Projected Demands Year Population Average Day Demand Peak Day Demand (mgd) (mgd) 2010 57,724 6.38 13.39 2015 60,724 6.70 14.08 2020 66,618 7.36 15.45 2025 72,544 8.01 16.83 2030 78,471 8.67 18.20 Notes: 1. Average Day Demand (ADD) is calculated by multiplying the population by a per capita usage of 110 gpcd. 2. Peak Day Demand (PDD) is calculated by multiplying ADD by the peak day peaking factor of 2.1. ES.3 CHAPTER 3 - HYDRAULIC MODEL Chapter 3 summarizes the development and calibration of the City's water system hydraulic model. The model was developed to facilitate evaluation of the system's ability to meet identified performance criteria under current and future conditions. The model was developed in InfoWater° based on the City's Geographic Information System (GIS) data, and includes all pipelines six -inch diameter and larger. The model incorporated operational settings for pump stations, supply sources, and PRVs, pump curves, pipe roughness coefficients, and the historical diurnal curves based on reservoir level and supply data. Based on the connectivity of the pipes, storage facilities, pump stations, and PRV stations, the system pressure zones were delineated in the model. The historical demand based on billing data per account was distributed throughout the model using geocoding. Once the geocoding was completed, demand profiles were established for 2009, 2016, and 2030. In each demand profile, the demands within each pressure zone were scaled uniformly to match current and projected water demands. The model was calibrated by comparing system pressures predicted by the model to data collected during field hydrant tests. System pressures were compared to data from twenty - two field tests; all model results were successfully calibrated to within 10 percent of field tests. ES.4 CHAPTER 4 - SYSTEM ANALYSIS Chapter 4 summarizes the capacity evaluation of the City's water supply, distribution system piping, pump stations, and storage reservoirs through the 20 -year planning period. This chapter includes the analysis criteria, followed by an evaluation of the existing system and improvements to address identified deficiencies. All the system evaluations were conducted under three scenarios: 2010 (existing system), 2016 (maximum use of Portland supply without Lake Oswego JWS), and 2030 (full Lake Oswego JWS). CAROLLOENGINEERS ES -6 Final - May 10 pw : / /Carollo/Documents/Client/0R/ Tigard /8287A00 /Deliverables /Executive_Summary.docx CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Policies & Criteria Through discussions with City staff, City policies and criteria for providing reliable pressure and flow to City customers were updated. These policies addressed the maximum and minimum system pressures, pipeline velocities, reliable capacity and power sources for pump stations, and operational, fire, and emergency storage required by storage facilities. All analyses were conducted against these established criteria. Analyses • Supply. The City will require additional supplies to meet the short-term future demands prior to bringing the new JWS online (in 2016). Comparing the existing sources of supply to the projected 2016 demands results in a supply deficit of 2.9 mgd during peak flows. After the JWS is online, the City should be able to meet demands until the year 2030, where a 0.1 -mgd supply deficit is anticipated. • Distribution System. Using the hydraulic model, the water system was evaluated under peak flow conditions. No pipelines were found to exceed the established velocity criteria. The system was also evaluated for its ability to meet peak flows under fire flow conditions, including the highest fire flow requirement per service level (based on land use), and for five specific properties as provided by the Insurance Services Offices (ISO). Four areas were identified with fire flow shortages, as well as several small diameter, dead -end pipelines. The largest deficiency identified was for providing fire flow to the 530 Pressure Zone. The system was able to meet all identified ISO fire flows. • Storage. Storage requirements for each pressure service level and for the entire system were calculated using the established storage criteria. Pressure zones and their associated demands were assigned into the 410, 550G, and 713 Service Levels according to how they are served by storage. Demands for the new West Bull Mountain area were also distributed accordingly. The results of the analysis show a large surplus of storage in the 410 and 550G Service Levels, and the overall system, and a 3.1 -MG storage deficit the 713 Service Level. Both the 530 and 830 Pressure Zones are not served by storage via gravity. • Pump Stations. The ability of existing pumping facilities to serve their associated service levels were calculated according to the established pump station criteria. Pressure zones and their associated demands were assigned into the 530, 550G, 713, and 830 Service Levels according to how they are served by boosted water. Because the City is in the process of constructing Pump Station 10, this pump station was assumed to be online. In addition to the pumping criteria of meeting peak demands, the service levels were also evaluated for their ability to meet ADD while recharging the ASR wells during off -peak periods. The results of the pumping analysis show that the only pumping deficiency is in the 530 Service Level, which requires an additional 2,200 gallons per minute (gpm) of pumping capacity to meet the fire flow requirements. Recommended Improvements Several recommended improvements were identified for addressing the existing system deficiencies. Recommended projects are summarized in Table ES.4, shown on Figures ES.4 & 5, and include the following: CAROLLO ENGINEERS ES -7 Final - May 10 pw://Ca rollo/Documents /Cl ientOR/ Tigard /8287A00/ Deliverables /Executive_Su mm ary.docx CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Supply. To ensure the City is able to meet the short-term demands prior to bringing the JWS online, equipping ASR Well 3 is recommended. To fully utilize this source, it is recommended that piping be installed to connect the area served by ASR Well 3 (the 550G Pressure Zone) to Reservoir 10 and to the 410 Pressure Zone near Reservoir 4. Other supply recommendations include development of ASR Well 4, and continued supply agreements with neighboring purveyors prior to implementing the JWS. • Distribution System. One major pipeline improvement was identified that will alleviate the fire flow deficiency in the 530 Pressure Zone, and will provide better system connectivity. This project includes connecting the 530 Pressure Zone to the 550G Pressure Zone, which is served by the new Reservoir 16. This project will allow both system demands and fire flows in the 530 Zone to be served by the reservoir. Five other pipeline improvements were identified to address the fire flow deficiencies, as shown in Figure ES.4. • Storage. Though a storage deficiency was identified in the 713 Service Level, additional storage is not recommended because the City has ample pumping capacity to meet the demands of these upper pressure zones. • Pump Stations. Pump Station 1 serving the 530 Pressure Zone was the only pump station identified with a deficiency. However, by connecting the 530 Pressure Zone to the 550G Pressure Zone, this deficiency is alleviated and Pump Station 1 can be removed. The City will be able to remove some pump stations from service with the planned new pump station. Replacing Pump Station 8 with a new pump station is also recommended. ES.5 CHAPTER 5 — JOINT WATER SUPPLY INTEGRATION Chapter 5 reviews the options for integrating the new Lake Oswego JWS into the Tigard water system in 2016. The new JWS will change the hydraulic grade line (HGL) at which the majority of supply enters the City's system, requiring system improvements. System Configuration The current water system configuration has the majority of supply (Portland) entering the system at the hydraulic grade line (HGL) of Reservoir 10 (470 feet). The new JWS will enter the system at the 410 Pressure Zone, the lowest pressure zone. Once the Portland supply is offline, much of the JWS supply will be required in the "upper zones," or zones above the 410 Pressure Zone served by Reservoir 10, especially during winter conditions when the ASR wells need to be recharged. Under the current system configuration, the 14 mgd of flow anticipated from the new JWS cannot be conveyed to the upper zones without causing excessive pressures in the 410 Zone. Improvements are needed to convey the required supply up to the HGL of the current Portland supply. Projected Demands To identify the required capacities for facilities needed to distribute the JWS, the projected demands for the 410 Zone and the upper zones were evaluated separately. The water requirements in the upper zones include customer demands, as well as ASR Well recharge during the winter. By the end of the planning period in 2030, total winter demands in the CAROLLOENGINEERS ES -8 Final - May 10 pw: / /Carollo /Docu ments/ Client /O R/ Tigard /8287A00/ Deliverables /Executive_Su m m ary.docx CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY upper zones require half of the JWS supply (approximately 4,300 gpm), especially for recharging the ASR Wells. Capacity Criteria Criteria were developed to support development of supply distribution alternatives given the system demands outlined above. The criteria focus on meeting system demands in the upper and lower zones, meeting ASR Well recharge requirements, and utilizing existing infrastructure. JWS Delivery Alternatives Two main alternatives were identified to integrate the JWS supply into the City's system to meet the established criteria. Cost estimates were prepared for these alternatives as presented below. • Alternative 1. This alternative includes a 20 -inch diameter designated transmission line from a new Pump Station 5 to Reservoir 10; pumping directly from the JWS HGL (320 ft) to the Reservoir 10 HGL (470 ft). A second set of pumps at the new Pump Station 5 would deliver flows to the 410 Service Level. This alternative was estimated to cost approximately $8.3 million. • Alternative 2. This alternative includes replacing Pump Station 5 to deliver JWS flows to the 410 Service Level only, and constructing a separate pump station to boost flows from the 410 Service Level to Reservoir 10. Under this alternative, no designated transmission line is necessary, as the new pump station would draw directly from the 410 Service Level. This alternative was estimated to cost approximately $5.1 million. Recommended Improvements Given the cost discrepancy between the alternatives, it is recommended that the City pursue Alternative 2 and construct both a new Pump Station 5 and a new booster pump station. This recommendation has other advantages including a smaller area of impact during construction, and simplified pump design and operation for the new Pump Station 5. ES.6 CHAPTER 6 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & MAINTENANCE PLANS This chapter presents a prioritized water system Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Capital Maintenance Plan (CMP) for the City. Cost Estimating Planning -level cost estimates were developed for each of the recommended CIP projects. These estimates are presented as total project costs in January 2010 dollars, corresponding to an Engineering News Record (ENR) 20- Cities Construction Cost Index (CCI) of 8,660. All costs include a 30 percent estimating contingency, 10 percent for general conditions, 15 percent for contractor overhead and profit, and 20 percent for engineering, legal and administration (ELA) costs. Costs are at a planning level (+50/-30 percent of accuracy) and should be refined as project- and site - specific requirements are further developed. CAROLLO ENGINEERS ES -9 Final - May 10 pw:BCarollo/ Documents /Client/ORfrigard /8287A00 /De l iverables /Executive_Summary . docx CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommended Capital Improvements Program The purpose of the CIP is to document capital projects that are required to improve capacity, improve the level of service, or improve system redundancy. Recommended improvement projects identified in Chapters 4 and 5 were assigned a project identification number and were prioritized and scheduled as presented in Table ES.3. Of the recommended projects, supply- or capacity - related projects were prioritized first, followed by projects addressing deficient fire flows. Supply- related improvements were scheduled to be completed one year before the year in which they are needed. Beyond the next five years, the implementation timing for the recommended CIP projects was developed in five -year increments. At the request of City staff, fire flow improvements (with the exception of the project addressing the 530 Pressure Zone) were grouped together into a general fire flow improvement category with an annual allocation. All recommended projects are shown graphically in Figures ES -4 and ES -5. Recommended Capital Maintenance Program The purpose of the CMP is to document projects that are required to maintain the current level of service, or renewing the life of existing assets as they reach the end of their design life. Projects identified in Chapters 4 and 5 that fall in the maintenance category include developing an asset management program, performing a reservoir seismic and condition assessment, Pump Station 8 replacement, and annual pipeline, meter, and hydrant replacements. Table ES.4 presents the recommended CMP. CAROLLOENGINEERS ES -10 Final - May 10 pw: / /Ca rollo /Docu ments /ClientOR/ Tigard /8287A00 /Deliverables /Executive_Summ ary.docx CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table ES.3 Recommended Capital Improvements Plan Capital Improvements Project Cost Year FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017- FY 2021- FY 2027- 2021 2026 2031 i*E749 Migigit: '1 9aV4;fti;RW.*,z,n taimenoi iieme;:rivi werivA51 W1 ASR Well 3 —Design & Equip $ 2,200,000 2011 $2,200,000 - - . _ - W2 ASR Well 4 —Drill & Equip Siting Study $ 30,000 2011 $ 30,000 - - - - - - Design; Drill & Equip Year 1 (50%) $ 1,859,000 2012 - $1,859,000 - - - Drill & Equip Year 2 (50%) $ 1,115,000 2013 - - $1,115,000 - - - - - #0:010#0:001MM:;4INZtq,'IiirAk6.R-17:-' ilt7,1',:50VA : Ft,,,:;::A . Eno,A;,:p:!:), :RZ:;INE::iii:IIM:RZFP:i4 PS1 Pump Station 5 Design (1) 2013 - (1) - - - Construction Year 1 (67%) (1) 2014 - (1) - - Construction Year 2 (33%) (1) 2015 - - (1) - - PS2 New Pump Station Siting Study $ 50,000 2012 - $ 50,000 - - - - Design $ 255,000 2013 - $ 255,000 - - - Construction Year 1 (67%) $ 963,000 2014 - - - $ 963,000 - Construction Year 2 (33%) $ 481,000 2015 - - $ 481,000 - - - ? iletPtMlig t7;!i rq;V;c. PRV1 New PRV from 550G to 410 Zone $105;000 2011 $105,000 - - PIPELINE IMPROVEMENTS rfrft Nea:KYMVV''!:Vti f!5,::::iliicA pli*Mnigg P1 Pipeline connecting 550G and 530 Zones Design $ 197,000 2011 $197,000 - - - - - - Construction $1,770,000 2012 - $1,770,000 - - - - P2 Annual Fire Flow Improvement Allocation $3,400,000 - - - - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 P3 Pipeline for installing PRV 550G-4 $ 17,000 2011 $ 17,000 - - - - - - P4 Pipeline in Main St. & Tigard Ave. $ 101,000 2011 $101,000 - - - - - - #70:01*0441:AttaXINNYtnitY Si Water Master Plan Update $ 140,000 2016 - - - $140,000 _ _ _ TOTAL COSTS $12,683,000 $ 2,650,000 $ 3,679,000 $ 1,470,000 $ 1,063,000 $ 581,000 $ 240,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Notes: 1. Costs included in Lake Oswego/Tigard Joint Water Supply Plan. 2. Includes total cost for $100,000 per year for four years, and $200,000 per year for another 15 years. 3. $200,000 for five years = $1,000,000. CAROLLO ENGINEERS ES-11 Final-May 10 CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table ES.4 Recommended Capital Maintenance Program Capital Maintenance Projects Cost Year FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017- FY 2021- FY 2027- 2021 2026 2031 : .' # f ;`; .� s'.` ,3 t "'- ,* -. ?+-x y > „ wc,' ':w„ :s;;: . .. .x ,,; t d s*s NIAN � xt,w � ��'. "`m �� ,�,. �" � . '�. .. • �� .. iac .., � ,<. x` �... �, �. � �. _.. �� ' `"'' °� MM1 Asset Management Program $100,000 2014 $100,000 RESERVOIR MAINTENANCE 1f . r #a timpul RM1 Reservoir Seismic and Condition $100,000 2015 - $100,000 - Assessment ,PUMP STATION MAINTENANCE z . PSM1 Replacement / Upgrade of PS 8 Design $210,000 - - - - - - $210,000 - - Construction $1,900,000 - - - - - - $1,900,000 - - PIPELINE MAINTENANCE r . ': A a .'. PM1 General Pipe Replacement $70,000 Annual $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 O,,THER'MP INTENANCE ? . n< .. gdkag tT° ,, f 0M1 Meter Replacement $125,000 Annual $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 0M2 Hydrant Replacement $120,000 Annual $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 TOTAL COSTS $2,055,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $415,000 $415,000 $315,000 $3,115,000 $1,575,000 $1,575,000 Notes: 1. $125,000 for five years = $625,000. 2. $120,000 for five years = $600,000. • CAROLLD ENGINEERS ES -12 Final - May 10 purl,, GerdlolDacumente/ ClienVOR/ rge< d18287 g00ID elberebleslF.xxutive_Semm�y.tlocz N Legend rr...- Portland W ell Supply e Reservoir 111 1\ • Existng &WA • Recommended Capital Improvement ,i110/1111111 £ 1 II !ilk Pressure Reducing Valve v Recommended Capital Improvement r Pump Station MI IrIllp, ,ill edr/gilliffirk ie Exist ng PS2: New P unp Station realli II il A A... NAN Recanmneded Capital Improvement 1 11111110 _._. AlLil 411114 ip PS3 Pump Staten 8 Replacemen Pipeline NI i■sillarlit 1 411 0 °1411 1 0 fil111Z)*Iniallr TePPlillift4 ki EAst ng stil — Recommended Capital Improvement Farrai a Pressure Zone 4 I .. m 1 t - Vier i PI WU 0 A 4/ f OL 1 h ,4111110 illal i ik tr I It — P2E: Fire Row LIsgrade 1-1 530 rpm ni x,* or go item PIM = 55 ° _ Willih st --S L., II Ale VoillirefibAti i ' P .,'• • = 713 erginlipli r -pi r 4. ow,7 az we'. Iallipalk Iltri, = 83. I . 00. . Marne. " - 1 6 Kirk - - i tit 4 0 . ,_ I Trili> • 5 S Replacem AI 46 A r-tt I psong - - - 4 iires PSI: Pump taten W 1 1 01 :100 ~ PS 11 tAilrill ' 4 4 2111 lik• ri (P 1 A 1 I 1.,11% iataP 1111 0 11.411W14 1 611 111%; nia itil ittPie°14 diRr r a l tr al l Th rtaMp 41 W2: New ASR-3 IF IN/L'Irlije Kormo.f , l�s, Lb.. P3/PRV1: New 550G to 410 valve iiie Oft and connecting Mpg ne IP egliiir ... "ow !' • di PM. Fire Row Upgrade I Notes: IIIMMI Al ' 1. PS2: Prat mnary locaton shown. Actual PS location to be determined. I P2A/P2B/P2Ci Fre Flow Upgrade FIGURE ES.4 2. W2: AS8-4 not shown on figHe. Location to be determined. Pl: New 550F/550G/530 RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS Connection WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 3.000 1.500 0 3.000 Air CITY OF TIGARD I=M1 Feet EAC.6011617igard1G161167prov.6 60 b 1 _c 1 6. 1 ”. 1 1,26/2010 830 ZONE LEGEND EXISTING FUTURE DESCRIPTION PRESSURE ZONE (HGL) 1100 — PIPE © © METER O gP ,O gP PUMP ® It I B 6 STATIONS PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE STATION 0 W CLOSED VALVE 8 1O PUMP MO - PUMP EMIAOTI t 713 \ 779 \ ( 713 \ — — ■ 1 ESERVOIR ERVOIR •RESERVOIR 7 IC AQUIFER STORAGE/ 700' — 61 62 63 RECOVERY WELL IA MO 1.01,113 0]1.10 _ g MCC \ f MCC 1 RV0 tti t S RRW63 RESERVOIR loxvurnnawM,ZMEM= TM IME ETOIA WOE Zan ano . RESERIVINI CAPACITY i i i i i i €F � € Il i i i i i 84° i i i. ©P°"""° ,, €€ l' � S E 'i € 80D— if 1 —gar 1n CONNECT It SERVICE LEVELS T SIC EIPPlY16� © �� M M 65011 RESERVOIR 550G 1e 1 500'— IDES — 5°°' T © � n PUMP STATION 10 470 P PUMP RESERVOIR STATION 13 NEW d�,p,l in 1 1 © ''� IMIEOCIEWCV M� aEnma.Y 0 S 1`J . s v im ! © nuum OM �1vnw © IE < M t8 T _ 410 ZONE 412 \ 412 ii____ �4 12 477 \ / 413 \ 410 470 \ 419 415 \ MO^Et RES RVOIR RESERV RESERVOIR 1 RESE4 VOTR RESERVOIR R E R IR f 1 R I RESHiVOIR RESERVOIR 410 ZONE 400 — N w W 3 DEOL10:03 ST ATNEW PUMP ON S t FIGURE ES.5 R gar— FUTURE HYDRAULIC PROFILE k WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN I ELEVATION CITY OF TIGARD C.ip 1 Nark P db 1-810 0247Pn Manton %RISE: c ��+� !i sy1w...Mn+4i2 aene.. Nth TNrw.. CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Other Recommendations Recommended system improvements and changes that are not included above in either the CIP or CMP, are presented in Table ES.5. These recommendations include facilities that can be taken out of service. Table ES.5 Other Recommendations Recommendation Notes Pursue short- and Required to meet immediate supply shortage prior to completion of medium -term supply ASR Well 3, as well as to provide additional supply through 2016 if agreements with Lake ASR Well 4 is not implemented. Oswego, TVWD, and /or the JWC. Include ability to back -fill Required to allow flows from ASR Well 3 to serve the 410 Zone. to Reservoir 10 in Pump Station 10 design. Remove Pump Station 12 This pump station will no longer be needed with the new Pump from service once the new Station 10 in place and is in poor condition. Pump Station 10 is complete. Remove Pump Station 2 This pump station will no longer be needed under normal operations from service once the JWS once the new Pump Station 10 in place, but should be maintained infrastructure is complete. for emergencies until the new booster pump station associated with the JWS (Project PS2) is operation. Remove Pump Station 11 This pump station does not have any clear function within the from service. current configuration of the City's system and is no longer needed. Remove Pump Station 1 The planned connection of the 530 Zone to the 550G Zone will from service once Project allow the area currently served by Pump Station 1 to be served by P1 is complete. Reservoir 16 and the new Pump Station 10. This pump station will no longer be required and is reported to be in poor condition. Consider removing the Upon completion of Project P1, these PRVs will no longer be following PRVs from needed to serve the old 550F and 550G Zones. City staff will service: 550G -1, 550G -2, determine whether to leave these PRVs in to provide system and 550F -1. redundancy, or to take them out of service. Remove PRV 410 -2 Following implementation of the JWS, this PRV will no longer be (Tiedeman PRV) from needed to convey Portland supply to the 410 Zone under normal service. operations. However, the City may wish to maintain this PRV to distribute supply from Portland during emergencies. CAROLLO ENGINEERS ES -15 Final - May 10 pw: / /Carollo /Docu ments /Cl ient/O R/Tig ard/8287A00/ Deliverables /Executi ve_Su m m ary. docx CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table ES.5 Other Recommendations Recommendation Notes Convert the Portland Once the JWS is on -line, the Portland transmission line will no supply transmission line longer be needed. It is recommended that this line be integrated into into a distribution line in the 410 Zone by opening existing valves. However, this line should the 410 Zone. be maintained free of service connections, such that it could be converted back to a transmission line for the Portland supply in an emergency. CAROLLO ENGINEERS ES -16 Final - May 10 pw:// Carollo/ Documents /Client/OR/Tigard /8287A 00 /Deliverables /Executive_Su mmary.docx SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET 10/26/2010 FOR :1o. (DATE OF MEETING) {u1i,.6 sQ.c Water System Master Plan Components of a Water System TIGARD May 2010 Master Plan Chapter 1 - Existing System Chapter 2 - Demand Projections .. ' f 7 . i -, , Chapter 3 - Hydraulic Model r':. r e °r. r � tt` " c _ _ , 4. Chapter 4 - System Analysis .' '1,._'r, ` ,t s 5 w �ti 5. Ch 5 - Integration of JWS with Lake Oswego =.,.. , - ;"4 "4. ' - ' Sa e. Chapter 6 Recommended Project List for CIP and i .s{ ` 't ra' - CMP 5 ,N- z� { -s , Planning period is for 20 years. ; , r 111 Recommend updating in five years. � r t am llo Chapter 1 - Existing System Chapter 2 - Demand Projections Pipes - Type, Size, Location and Age - Pumps - Capacity, Location, Backup Power and Age Wells /ASR — Capacity, Location Reservoirs - Capacity, Location and Age a , ' yr_ t'.. . _. 2010 2010 2020 2020 2030 * Year Water demands within the service area are The service area is well - served by existing projected to increase by nearly 40% by 2030 infrastructure with very few improvements needed Chapter 3 - Hydraulic Model Chapter 4 - System Analysis (Fire Flows) / :• rQ i / w � J ,. '! ! •ate^ s F mi l _ I e � 1 3 ; _ ' 2 k4 - �r 3 7 . : ■ The time and effort the City put into developing GIS and the new '4J ■ ...... • : •• - hydraulic model will provide continuing benefits, including opnnnmig /WS Intl astr tore Almost all of the distribution system has sufficient flows to fight fires 10/26/2010 Chapter 4 - System Analysis Chapter 4 - System Analysis 20.0 20 0 - - -- 16 0 18 0 16 160 u.0 R Shortage ot2.9mgd — la o —'`AyR a ono Other supplies € 120 Lake Os E 120 • .o.-ASR We113 10° Lake Oswego 1 6.0 10 Portland E 60 8 B0 Portland 40 60 zD ASR Wells l &2 4.0 Well 2 ASR Wells 1 & 2 2A 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Well 2 y.., Additional supplies are needed to meet short term 2000 2015 zoxo 2025 2030 peak day supply shortages through 2016 Year The completion of ASR 3 will help the system to meet short term peak day supply shortages through 2016 Chapter 5 - Integration of JWS with Chapter 4 - System Analysis Lake Oswego 20 0 eo 18.0 Swery A _ 14.0 € i2 ° Joint Water € 10.0 Supply , oon n _ l,a61. d s.o r, I i 8 :. 1 0 a. 20 ASRWells1 &2 _ Well2 - - -,.■ 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 140 With ASR Well 3, the /WS will meet the City's needs The JWS will change the location at which supply enters through 2030 and beyond the service area Chapter 5 - Integration of JWS with Recommended Capital Improvement Projects Lake Oswego Project Costtsl Year Reason - SR Well 3 Design 6 52,200,000 2011 Shot ream and Loy Term Water a�� Equip ,• AIR 2g Long Te,n Well45ning 53,mD4.mmg D,3 Equip Ilir� PSI - Replete Kelp Ir 0 M the 2013 -2015 Deliver Lard Oswego supply Into tdw w hew 005 Midget Nerd Station s ms agas waater System Et.rstnrp P.:c tl.inc? Buis — (7, 6 52 - H Booster Pump $1,]49,000 2012 -2015 D elver Water from 910 pressure zone Station to to 10 MG Reserver /Bull Mountain 1 New taw PRVI - New PRA from $105,000 2011 Delivers ASR 3 Weer to 410 pressure L. . 501 I10 to from FM fl ]one PI - P om 550G to 41.96),000 201/2012 ow deficiencies on ...Om 530 Zone P2 • Annual Fire Flow 5100,000 /year 20142031 Dredbutwn Fire flow drier l efle! . II A &� J A I Improvements - 2011 Delivers ASR �_ f pme Wa[er 3 V V 1 Pipeline connecting $l],000 0410 pressure R meeraRle Supply (Bonita Rd P5. 3 Water 51 • Wares Master Plan 5140,000 2016 Integration of NM JWS requires a new booster pump upa4te station to deliver water to Reservoir 10 Very few capital projects are required due to the good condition of the existing water system 2 10/26/201 Recommended Capital Maintenance Projects Project Costlsl Year Reason MM3 -Asset Management Rcpgcem 5100,000 2014 Define the $000 g InfraslruRUre RM1- Reset.. Seism(A Condition 5100.000 2015 Assess the Seismic Assessment of Old. Resets., PSM1- Replacement /Upgrade of p5 8 $2,110,000 20120 Replace an Aging pump Questions? Station PM, General Pipeline Replacement 520,000 /year 2011 -2031 Replace Rang pipes 001 -Meter Replacement 5125,000 /year 2011 -2071 Replace Aging Meters 0M2- Hydrant Replacement 5120,000 /year 2011 -2031 Replace Aging NYdran[s Planned CMP projects will maintain the high level of service provided to current customers C comp. /8491 Eag.eef M ltCrrO.e, avn 3 !AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.3 - CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: Aug. 10, 2010 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name: Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. Name: Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. Name: Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. FOR • - •3 (DATE OF MEETING) CITIZEN COMMUNICATION 13 �I t. T>Y1m-tlillv"CCe SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET � �� O� a�a►o� +� U p�. COM IN E VEN TS •3 ~`-,__ , „. - ::: , ,, _ - £ 'fig h i ' ` , .+' r � ' _, r f ®ATE: =OF M T I G) =- - ° $ ! 1 C ' . =- '' ,r: Good Morning Tigard (GMT)- Business Networking-- 7.30- 9:00am - FREE • 08/19/10 — Denture Design • Hosted at their location - .- Corr4 -c • 13075 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard OR 97223 i :kg, o 08/26/10 — Oregon Sleep Specialists • Hosted at the Tigard Chamber, Pearson Room cz t&-. • 12345 SW Main Street, Tigard, OR 97223 rct , r�6e.- • 09/02/10 — Foundation for Tigard Tualatin Schools • Hosted at the Tigard Chamber, Pearson Room 12345 SW Main Street, Tigard, OR 97223 • 09/09/10 — Tigard Farmers Market and Young's Funeral Home • Hosted at Young's Funeral Home • 11831 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard OR 97223 o 09/16/10 — Blessings of the Spirit • Hosted at the Tigard Chamber, Pearson Room • 12345 SW Main Street, Tigard, OR 97223 Other Chamber Events Lunch & Learns — Free, Noon to 1:00 p.m. - Xi2_ e eblC • 08 19 10 — Portland Short Sales Secrets ,� � ,v' cL,_ • 08/26/10 — Building a Referral Business o 08/19/10 — Portland Short Sales Secrets • 09/16/10 - Community Warehouse Overview • Hosted at Tigard Chamber, Pearson Room, Noon — 1:00 p.m. - • 12345 SW Main Street, Tigard, OR 97223 • 09/13/10 — Golf Tournament • Hosted at Tualatin Country Club • 09/30/10 — Speed Networking 7:00am — 9:00am • Hosted at Embassy Suites near Washington Square ,e-LeG - fie. • 9000 SW Washington Square Road, Tigard, 97223 n'' L6+ by a. , For more info, go to - http://tigardareachamber.org/directoryievents �� ti L� 4 �3 . ' ' ,. w�I.Qre s � [ Findus on F cebook AIS -144 Item #: 3 • I Business Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Receive and File - Council Calendar Prepared By: Carol Krager, Administration Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Consent - Receive and File Information ISSUE Receive and file only. See attachments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments a. Council Calendar b. Tentative Agend4 Agenda Item No. 3.1.a For Agenda of August 10. 2010 • MEMORANDUM TIGARD TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council FROM: Carol Krager, Deputy City Recorder RE: Three -Month Council Meeting Calendar DATE: August 3, 2010 Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk ( *). August 10* Tuesday Council Business Meeting — 6:30 pm, Town Hall 17* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting — 6:30 pm, Town Hall 24* Tuesday Council Business Meeting - CANCFT.T.F.D September 14* Tuesday Council Business Meeting — 6:30 pm, Town Hall 21* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting — 6:30 pm, Town Hall 28* Tuesday Council Business Meeting — 6:30 pm, Town Hall October 12* Tuesday Council Business Meeting — 6:30 pm, Town Hall 19* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting — 6:30 pm, Town Hall 26* Tuesday Council Business Meeting — 6:30 pm, Town Hall I: \ADM \City Council \Council Calendar \3 -month calendar for c mtg 100810.doc Agenda Item No. 3 . i • 6 City Council Tentative Agenda Meeting of Al-/W t 14 �6l (7 8/3/2010 11:41 AM Meeting Form 'T SubArea Department Division Entered rubmitted y Date -- - Finalized I - Title Area _____ -- -- __ __ w - - -- I — - - - - - -- --- - --- - -_--_ 1117 1Cathy Wheatley 08/17/2010 1AAA e Au gust d City Hall 010 I Absences to Note: 07/14/2010 ____ _ 1 I- --- 7 ulia Wade 108/17/2010 CCWKSHOP 30 Minutes - Photo Enforcement and Red Light T �City Council Police 06/14/2010 07/13/2010 Workshop Camera Options for Traffic Safety 1 1 16 Judith 08/17/2010 CCWKSHOP 20 Minutes - Regional Transportation Planning City Council Community Long Range 06/17/2010 Hartnett 5, Asst Gray Update -- Progress Report on Activities Related to Workshop Development Planning CD Director High Capacity Transit 3 2 Kathy 1108 /17 /20101CCWKSHO 30 Minutes - Discuss Updating TMC 12 Water and City Council Public Works Water 06/21/2010 Mollusky K, 5 1Jo Sewer, and Corresponding Policies and Procedures 2 Workshop Conf Exec Asst 53 John n Floyd 08/17/2010 CCWKSHOP 30 Minutes - Review and Discusss Proposed Use City Council Community Long Range 06/22/2010 Floyd 3, Classification Development Code Amendment Workshop Development Planning Associate (DCA2010- 00004) 4 Planner 58 Loreen 08/17/2010 CCWKSHOP 30 Minutes - Engineering Performance Review City Council Administration Assistant to City 06/23/2010 Mills L, Asst to Update 6 Workshop Manager /Risk City Manager Mills Mgmt. 59 Kent 08/17/2010 CCWKSHOP 30 Minutes - Review and Discuss Draft Code of City Council Administration Assistant to City 06/23/2010 Mills L, Asst to Wyatt Conduct for Elected Officials and Appointed Workshop Manager/Risk City Manager g Board /Committee /Commission Members 5 II II Total Time: 170 of 180 Minutes have been scheduled _ ^_ — -1 1118 Kathy 11 08/24/2010 AAA Meeting Date: August 24, 2010 MEETING 07 Wheatley CANCELLED! I ______________ - � 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 1100 Kathy 1109/14/201011AAA 11Meeting Date: ation: September 14, Hall 2010 I Absences to Wheatley Note: Loc Tigard 189 1Cheryi 1 09 /14 /2010 120 Minutes - Executive Session - Possible Litigation Study Community Development 07/07/2010 Csines C, Assoc Caines Session Development Services Planner I 1trotal Time: 20 of 45 Minutes have been scheduled T �_� �` ,__ _� — I 1 City Council Tentative Agenda 8/3/2010 11:41 AM 38 Kathy 09/14/2010 ACONSENTConsent Item - Approve Water System Public Works Water 06/21/2010 Murchison R, Mollusky Master Plan - Resolution Senior Project Engineer 139 (Kathy 09 /14 /2010lACONSENlConsent Item - Approve Sanitary Sewer Public Works Water 06/21/2010 Koellermeier D, Mollusky I Master Plan - Resolution Public Works Dir 49 Kathy 09/14/2010 ACONSENT Consent Item - Award Contract for Local Public Works Facilities 06/22/2010 Barrett J, Sr Mgmt Mollusky Structural Repairs of the Fanno Creek Contract Analyst - Finance House Review Board 135 Kathy 09/14/2010 ACONSENT Consent Item - Consider a Resolution Public Works Parks 07/27/2010 Mollusky K, Conf Mollusky Appointing Marshall Henry as Member to the Exec Asst Parks and Recreation Advisory Board 31 Kathy 09/14/2010 ACONSENT Consent Item - Approve Memorandum of Consent Agenda Public Works Engrg - Const 06/18/2010 Koellermeier D, Mollusky Understanding between Metro and Tigard Svcs & Support Public Works Dir for Washington Square Regional Center Trail 63 Joanne 09/14/2010 CCBSNS 5 Minutes - Proclaim September 2010 Proclamations Administration 06/23/2010 06/24/2010 Bengtson National Alcohol & Drug Addiction Recovery Month 90 Joanne 09/14/2010 CCBSNS 5 Minutes - Proclaim September 17 -23, Proclamations Administration City Mgr /Asst 07/07/2010 07/15/2010 Bengtson 2010 Constitution Week City Mgr /Admin Staff 138 Joanne 09/14/2010 CCBSNS 5 Minutes - Proclaim September 18, 2010 Proclamations Administration 07/28/2010 Newton L, Asst Bengtson Family Day, A Day to Eat Dinner with your City Manager Children 136 Marissa 09/14/2010 CCBSNS 5 Minutes - Receive Recognition for Discussion or Community Long Range 07/27/2010 Laughlin D, Sr Daniels Participation in 2010 Census Action Item Development Planning Admin Specialist 54 John 09/14/2010 CCBSNS 45 Minutes - Public Hearing to Consider Discussion or Community Long Range 06/22/2010 Floyd J, Associate Floyd Adoption of Use Classification Development Action Item Development Planning Planner Code Amendment (DCA2010- 00004) 9 City Council Tentative Agenda 8/3/2010 11:41 AM 125 Kathy 09/14/2010 CCBSNS 5 Minutes - Quasi - Judicial Public Hearing to Consider the Discussion or Public Works Water 07/20/2010 Mollusky K, Conf Mollusky Ordinance Withdrawing Property from Tualatin Valley Action Item Exec Asst Water District 43 Kathy 09/14/2010 CCBSNS 15 Minutes - Consider Ordinance Updating TMC 12, Water Discussion or Public Works Water 06/21/2010 Mollusky K, Conf Mollusky and Sewers (Create Utility Svc Rules; Set Policy Updates Action Item Exec Asst by Resolution; Staff Approve Water Leak Credits) - 44 Kathy 09/14/2010 CCBSNS 15 Minutes - Burnham Street and CIP Project Report Discussion or Public Works Engrg - Const Svcs 06/21/2010 McMillan K, Mollusky ction Item & Support Engineering Manager Total Time: 100 of 110 Minutes have been scheduled I II II L — — " "" I 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 1 IlL 01'Cathy 09/21/2010 AA Meeting oc Date: Tigard September City Hall 21, 2010 I Absences to Note: Wheatley 45 Kathy 09/21/2010 CCWKSHOP 90 Minutes - Water Rate Consultant Final City Council Public Works Water 06/21/2010 Goodrich J, Utility Mollusky Recommendations on Water Rate Study and SDC Update Workshop Div Manager 83 Darren 09/21/2010 CCWKSHOP 60 Minutes - Council Workshop on Tigard 2035 City Council 'Community Long Range 06/29/2010 Wyss D, Senior Wyss Transportation System Plan (TSP) (CPA2010- 00001) Workshop Development Planning Planner 132 Loreen 09/21/2010 CCWKSHOP 30 Minutes - Review Council Groundrules Update With City Council Administration ssistant to City 07/26/2010 Mills L, Asst to Mills Council Code of Conduct Workshop Manager /Risk City Manager Mgmt. I I 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 102 Cathy �0 ( M Location: r 9/ 28/ eeting Date: Tigard Cit September Hall 28, 2010 I Absences to Note: Wheatley II II y -------- _ I 15 Cheryl 09/28/201 CBSNS 60 Minutes - Consider a proposed Comprehensive Plan Consent Community Development 06/16/2010 Caines C, Assoc Caines Amendment and Sensitive Lands Review to extend Wall Agenda Development Services Planner Street across Fanno Creek to the Fred Fields property. II II II IlTotal Time: 60 of 110 Minutes have been scheduled -- —_ — 3 City Council Tentative Agenda 8/3/2010 11:41 AM 106 1 1Cathy 10 /12 /201011AAA I • • • • •' 2010 • • " I ` t t 1 heatley ( •• ' - __ Renewal 13 / Alison 110/12/2010IACCSTUDY 15 Minutes - WCCI$;p.L �, __r "� Grimes ILITotal Time: 15 of 45 Minutes have been scheduled 41 Kathy 10/12/2010 CCBSNS 15 Minutes - Pass a Resolution Authorizing the Mayor to Sign Discussion or Public Works Water 06/21/2010 Mollusky K, Conf Mollusky the IGA between Tigard and Sherwood for Joint Funding of the Action Item Exec Asst Water Supply Improvements 139 Darren 10 /12 /201011CCBSNS 160 Minutes - Public Hearing - Tigard 2035 Transportation Discussion or Community Long Range 07/28/2010 Laughlin D, Sr Wyss System Plan (CPA2010- 00001) ,Action Item Development Planning Admin Specialist If Total Time: 75 of 110 Minutes have been scheduled II II I „ -_e_ __________ 1 10 /C athy I 07/14/2010 1110/19/20101AAA 1Meeting Date: I Absences to Note: I Location: Tigard City Hall Wheatley __ – — I 1 1221John 10/19/2010 CCWKSHOP130 Minutes - Water Rate Study and Water SDC Update - Water City Council Public Works 1Water 07/15/2010 Goodrich J, Utility Goodrich Financial Plan Workshop I Div Manager IITotal Time: 30 of 180 Minutes have been scheduled II 11 - 1 10 Cathy 10/26/20 10 AAA eeting Date: Octo 26, 2010 I Absences to Note: I 07/14/2010 Wheatley 1 Location: Tigard City H a ll 60 1Kent Wyatt 10/26/2010 CCBSNS 20 Minutes - Proposed Code of Conduct for Elected and D t on Item or Administration 06/23/2010 MCity ills Manager , Aso Appointed Officials II II I Total Time: 20 of 110 Minutes have been scheduled t -- -- � ------ I 1091 Cathy 11/09/201 Meeting Date: I Absences to Note: I Location: Tigard City Hall 07/14/2010 Wheatley �- — — i I 07/14/2010 110 Cathy 11/16/201 AAA Meeting Date: November 16, 2010 I Absences to Note: Wheatley 1 Location: Tigard City Hall . _, ____ - -I I - 111 Cathy I11/23/20101AAA eeting Date: November 23, 2010 I Absences to Note: I 07/14/2010 Wheatley _ Location: Tigard City Hall , -.- -_ —I 4 City Council Tentative Agenda 8/3/2010 11:41 AM 112 Cathy 12 /14 /2010 II AAA ( Meeting Location: Date: Tigard December City Hall 14, 2010 I Absences to Note: I 07/14/2010 Wheatley I I I I 07/14/2010 113 Cathy 12/21/2010 AAA I Meeting Location: Date: Tigard December City Hall 21, 2010 I Absences to. Note: Wheatley 1 I I 114 Cathy I12/28/2010IAAA Meeting Date: December 28, 2010 I Absences to Note: I 07/14/2010 Wheatley 112/28/20101 AAA N Location: Tigard City Hall 5 AIS -141 Item #: 3.2. &- Business Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Approve City Council Minutes Prepared By: Cathy Wheatley, Administration Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda - CCDA Information ISSUE 3.1 Approve Council Minutes: a. May 25, 2010 STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST N/A KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY N/A OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A AIS -126 Item #: Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Appoint Donald Schmidt, Current Planning Commission Alternate, to the Planning Commission Prepared By: Susan Hartnett, Community Development Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Information ISSUE Should Council appoint Donald Schmidt, a current Planning Commission Alternate, to serve the remaining portion of the term previously held by Rex Caffall? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Appoint Donald Schmidt, current Planning Commission Alternate, to the remaining portion of the term previously held by Rex Caffall. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY At the June 8, 2010 Business Meeting, the City Council passed Resolution 10 -32, which removed Planning Commissioner Rex Caffall from the Planning Commission. This action also created a vacant voting member position on the Commission. Following interviews late in 2009, the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommended that the Council appoint Richard Shavey and Donald Schmidt to fill the then vacant alternate positions on the Planning Commission. Council approved these appointments through Resolution 09 -74. Both Mr. Schmidt and Mr. Shavey have been regular attendees at Planning Commission meetings since their appointment. Because little time has passed since the appointment of these alternates, staff felt, and the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee concurred, that additional recruitment and interviews were not needed to fill the current vacancy. The Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommends that Donald Schmidt be appointed to to the Planning Commission and fill the remaining portion of the voting member term previously held by Rex Caffall. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Additional recruitment and interviews were considered and rejected. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS NA DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION None. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: None Attachments Resolution AIS -88 Item #: , L� Business Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Approve and Authorize the City Manager to Sign an IGA with the TTSD for the City of Tigard's Participation in Year Three of the Safe Schools Grant Prepared By: Jim DeSully, Police Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Information ISSUE Shall the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to sign an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Tigard - Tualatin School District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends that the City Council approve and give the City Manager approval to sign the IGA. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY In the spring of 2008, the Tigard - Tualatin School District applied for a Federal Safe Schools Grant. The Tigard Police Department participated in the grant process as one of many mandatory partners. The grant will enter into its third year during the 10/11 school year. The Tigard Police will provide an after school youth program at Fowler Middle School and Twality Middle School. Both programs will be modeled after a similar pilot program started by the police department at Twality Middle School. The Tigard Police will also provide one session of the GREAT Families program, designed to bring families together affected by gang influences. The Tigard Police will receive $76,653 to offset expenses for providing the two after school programs at Fowler and Twality Middle Schools and the GREAT Families program. If approved by Council, the Police Department would enter into year three of a four year commitment with the Tigard - Tualatin School District to provide the after school youth programs, renewable each year. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Fall of 2008 and August of 2009. Fiscal Impact Cost: $76,653 Budgeted (yes or no): yes Where Budgeted (department /program): Police Support Services Additional Fiscal Notes: The amount reimbursed to the City of Tigard covers all operational cost to run these programs up to $76,653, including officers' time, program expenses, and contract cost with Boys and Girls Club of Portland. Budget is in the FY201 I Adopted Budget in Police Support Services. Attachments Safe Schools IGA SAFE SCHOOLS/HEALTHY STUDENTS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT The parties to this agreement ( "Parties ") are Tigard- Tualatin School District No. 23J, a school district of the State of Oregon ( "District "), and The City of Tigard, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, acting by and through its Police Department ( "Tigard P.D. "). The parties enter into this agreement pursuant to authority granted in ORS Chapter 190 (Intergovernmental Cooperation). RECITALS A. The District has received a four -year grant, in which the third year has an allocation of $1,474,947.00, from the United States Department of Education, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and the United States Health & Human Services Department for the purpose of instituting a Safe Schools /Healthy Students Program ( "SS/HS Grant "), called the Tigard Tualatin Alliance for Successful Kids ( "TTASK" Force). The TTASK Force is made up of the District and all our agency partners including Washington County, the Department of Human Services, and the cities of Tigard and Tualatin and their respective police departments. The Tigard P.D. has the experience and expertise to help the District implement the program. B. The parties believe that partnership and collaboration are essential to the success of the Program and desire to enter into this Intergovernmental Agreement ( "Agreement ") to accomplish this purpose. AGREEMENT I. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The District and its partners propose an integrated, comprehensive, community -wide, and community - specific plan to address the problems of school violence and alcohol and other drug abuse. This plan is focused on five elements: • Element 1: Safe school environments and violence prevention activities. • Element 2: Alcohol and other drug prevention activities. • Element 3: Student behavioral, social, and emotional supports. • Element 4: Mental health services. • Element 5: Early childhood social and emotional learning programs. The overarching goals of the project are to: 1. Create an inclusive, supportive, respectful school culture and secure environment, so that Tigard- Tualatin students and staff feel physically and emotionally safe. 2. Provide every child with the support and skills to resist alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use. 3. Ensure each student will have the support and skills to be healthy, productive members of the school community. PDXDOCS:1755932.1 7:10 PM 4. Provide all children with identified mental health needs access to comprehensive services. 5. Ensure children enter school with the social and behavioral skills needed to be successful learners. The TTASK Force partners are dedicated to improving outcomes for children and their families through building a dynamic community -owned coalition made up of the Tigard - Tualatin School District, the Washington County Juvenile and Conciliation Services, Washington County Commission on Children and Families, Washington County Health and Human Services, the Tigard Police Department, the Tualatin Police Department, and the Department of Human Services. The project will transform the current system by challenging the status quo and taking new and creative approaches to infrastructure development and service delivery. II. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE TIGARD P.D. A. Services to be performed by the Tigard P.D.: 1) Act as a partner in the development and implementation of the project; 2) provide support to the schools in the development of safe, crime free environments; 3) continue to provide youth with positive relationships with law enforcements officers; 4) continue to lead and increase meaningful afterschool program at Fowler Middle School with the use of Boys and Girls Club of America; 5) coordinate, implement, and supervise afterschool activities at Fowler Middle School for a minimum of forty students, for up to thirty weeks (including snacks, field trips, bussing, supplies, and other related programming activities); 6) provide SRO services for up to 5 hours per week for afterschool services at Twality Middle School, 7) provide one session of the GREAT Families program, 8) make certain Tigard P.D. staff and /or subcontracted staff are adequately trained, supervised, and evaluated to ensure students are safe and productive; 9) meet the minimum number of staff as prescribed in the SS/HS grant application (four total staff); and, 10) assist Tigard Schools in the assessment of the adequacy of school safety and crisis plans and development of staff competency in implementation of such plans. The Tigard P.D. agrees to assign Director -level membership to participate on the TTASK Force Coordinating Council to ensure the project results in sustainable, effective, efficient, and flexible systems of support for children and families of our community. The Coordinating Council will meet monthly to address policy, direction, design, and coordination, and provide the Project Director with on -going support in the development, implementation, review, and on -going modification of the program. The implementation of the project will primarily be accomplished through the TTASK Force Workgroups, which will meet a maximum of twice- monthly to accomplish the immediate work of the project. The Tigard P.D. agrees to provide meaningful membership to this group. The coordination and communication of these groups will be a model for the collaboration and community wide outcomes of the TTASK Force. The Tigard P.D. recognizes that participation by those who will benefit from the programs is essential and endorses the inclusion of the work of the Family Advisory Council. In addition, quarterly Community Forums will be held to provide an opportunity for the sectors of the 2 community (faith community, private schools, entities representing the diversity of the community, the business community, etc.) that participated in the project to continue to assist in the development and implementation of its components. The Tigard P.D. agrees to participate in the monthly Family Advisory Council and quarterly Community Forums. The Tigard P.D. will provide reports, within 30 days of written requests, of progress towards project goals. These goals are stated in the TTASK logic model and evaluation plan. B. Compliance with SS/HS Grant. The Tigard P.D. will perform work relative to achieving goals and objectives stated in the TTASK logic model and evaluation plan. C. Background Checks. The Tigard P.D. will meet the federal requirements of criminal background checks and compliance, and with the District's criminal history verification and fingerprinting requirements at the Tigard P.D.'s expense for all employees who will have unsupervised contact with students as a result of the provision of services under this Agreement. The Tigard P.D. and its contractors will ensure compliance with this requirement by each employee before that employee may begin providing services under this Agreement. D. Confidentiality. The Tigard P.D. will ensure that its employees and contractors maintain the confidentiality of student information under FERPA and Oregon Student Records Regulations. The Tigard P.D. will work collaboratively with the District to provide information and training on confidentiality to staff and contractors. E. Invoicing and Payment • Submit invoices quarterly: o September 30 - by the 20` day of the next month o December 31 - by the 20` day of the next month o March 31 - by the 20` day of the next month o June 30 — by the 20` day of the next month • Summarize all hours, gross salaries and benefits by individual • Summarize all expenditures by individual • Payment is made only for services delivered and itemized • Send invoices attention to: Ray Grosenbach • Invoices can be transmitted via e -mail, fax, or postal mail o Fax No. (503) 431 — 4037 o E -Mail: rrosenbach@ttsd.kl2.or.us 3 o Postal mail: Larry Hibbard Administration Center Attention: Ray Grosenbach Tigard- Tualatin School District 6960 SW Sandburg St. Tigard, OR 97223 • The maximum allowed charges against this contract for the period from July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 shall be: The Tigard P.D. = $76,653 i. Includes: 1. Personnel: Reimbursement will be based on: a. quarterly invoices (which reflect monthly activity as documented on the "Safe Schools /Healthy Students: Contracted Services Monthly Report "), b. service and participation according to section III of this agreement, and, c. according to the scope and purpose of the Tigard Police Department's vital partnership with the Safe Schools /Healthy Students project. 2. Materials /curriculum /transportation /snacks for students and families /field trips /supplies documented on invoices and /or the "Safe Schools /Healthy Students: Contracted Services Monthly Report" (includes ALL materials and curriculum necessary to execute programs referenced in Section IIA). ii. ALL other expenditures not referenced in Sections IIIA and IIIB (including use of any subcontractor's email /technology system and limited office space utilization) are the responsibility of the Tigard Police Department, unless written approval is obtained from the Tigard- Tualatin School District. F. Audit. The Tigard P.D. agrees to comply with audit requirements of the SS /HS Grant and to provide copies of their annual report and any other reports from agency audits performed during this Agreement. G. Records. The Tigard P.D. agrees to maintain program and fiscal documentation for services rendered. Such documentation shall be maintained in accordance with applicable federal and state laws and implementing regulations. All program and fiscal documentation is subject to audit. The Tigard P.D. assumes fiscal responsibility for preparation of program and fiscal documentation, supplies and materials. 4 III. RESPONSIBILITIES OF DISTRICT A. Services to be performed by The Tigard - Tualatin School District. 1) Provide leadership in the development and implementation of the project; 2) work with partners to improve aspects of the project as it progresses; 3) act as fiscal agent for the project; 4) hire a Project Director and Administrative Assistant; 5) manage and convene meetings of the project Coordinating Council, Community Forums, Family Advisory Council and Operations Work Groups; 6) coordinate the development of necessary Intergovernmental Agreements and Memorandums of Understanding; 7) oversee the evaluation of the project and provide program evaluation data to all partner agencies; 8) hire, support and supervise 3.5 Strategic Tutors; 9) hire, support and supervise 1.0 Effective Behavior and Instructional Support Coach; 10) hire, support and supervise 1.0 Intercambio Activities Coordinator; 11) expand the district's training in cultural competency; 12) assign leadership for the Youth Services Team; 13) purchase, and provide training for adopted violence and drug /alcohol prevention curricula; 14) coordinate community-wide early childhood screening and identification activities; and 15) ensure Tigard - Tualatin District staff are knowledgeable regarding grant- funded programs. B. Provision of Space and Necessary Materials. All equipment and materials purchased with TTASK Force grant funds are the property of the district upon termination of contract. C. Payment. • Allow ten days after TTSD receives invoice for payment • Payment will be mailed to: Tigard Police Department Attn: Tom Imdieke 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 IV. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Term. The term shall be July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011. This agreement must be renewed each year, for a maximum of five years from the original grant award (July 1, 2008) by written agreement of the TTASK Force partners. B. Termination. 1. Termination for Convenience. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by any party upon thirty (30) days written notice. 2. Termination for Cause; Cure. This Agreement may be terminated for cause by any party by providing thirty (30) days notice of breach of contract to the breaching party. This Agreement will not be terminated if the breaching party cures the breach prior to conclusion of the notice period. 5 3. Termination for Lack of Funding. This Agreement is contingent upon the availability of adequate funding. 4. Compensation at Termination. In the event of termination, District shall compensate The Tigard P.D. for services performed up to the date of termination. C. Indemnification. Subject to the conditions and limitations of the Oregon Constitution and the Oregon Tort Claims Act, ORS 30.260 through 30.300, the Tigard P.D. shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District from and against all liability, loss, and costs arising out of or resulting from the acts of the Tigard P.D., its officers, employees and agents, including intentional or willful misconduct, in the performance of this agreement, and the District shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Tigard P.D. from and against all liability, loss, and costs arising out of or resulting from the acts of the District, its officers, employees and agents, including intentional or willful misconduct, in the performance of this agreement. If any aspect of this indemnity shall be found to be illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this indemnification. The term "costs" as used in this indemnification section shall include attorney fees at arbitration, mediation, trial or on appeal. D. Insurance. The Tigard P.D. and District agree to each maintain insurance or self insurance consistent with provisions of the Oregon Tort Claims Act, ORS 30.270 and customary for public agencies of the same size and type. E. Adherence to Law. Each party shall comply with all federal, state and local laws and ordinances applicable to this agreement. F. Non - discrimination. Each party shall comply with all requirements of federal and state civil rights and rehabilitation statutes and local non - discrimination ordinances. G. Access to Records. Each party shall have access to the books, documents and various records of the other party which are related to this agreement for the purpose of examination, copying, and audit, unless otherwise limited by law. H. Subcontracts and Assignment. No party will further subcontract or assign any part of this agreement without the written consent of the other party. All TTASK Force partners that plan on subcontracting services must adhere to regulations specified in Section 80.36 in EDGAR. I. This is the entire agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire and integrated agreement between the Parties and may be modified or amended only by the written agreement of the Parties. 6 DATE: TIGARD- TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 23J By: Rob Saxton Superintendent DATE: CITY OF TIGARD By: Craig Prosser City Manager 7 AIS -97 Item #: 3.,J • 4 Business Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Award Contract for Purchase of Two Chevrolet /Tahoe Police Vehicles Prepared By: Kathy Mollusky, Public Works Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda - LCRB • Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board approve the purchase of two Chevrolet/Tahoe Police Vehicles? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board approve the purchase of the two Chevrolet /Tahoe police vehicles. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY • For operational, financial, and safety reasons, the City of Tigard follows a vehicle replacement schedule based on industry standards regarding length of service, and maintenance and repair costs. • Based upon this schedule, there are two 2006 model vehicles with very high mileage due to be replaced this fiscal year. • The vehicles will be purchased through the State of Oregon contract, thus assuring competitive pricing and saving the City the cost and time of preparing a solicitation. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board could choose not to approve the purchase of the two Chevrolet /Tahoe police vehicles and provide staff with direction on some other course of action. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS None. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Fiscal Impact Cost: $52,083 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where Budgeted (department /program): PD Patrol Additional Fiscal Notes: These vehicles cost $26,041 each and are fully funded in the Police Operations Budget. SUPPLE ENTAL PACKET AIS -so FOR (DATE OF MEETINGi #:. _ Business Meeting ` b Date: 08/10/2010 (U46410A-....41. Length (in minutes): Consent Item r Agenda Title: Award Contract for Pavement Management Program Pavement Overlays to Knife River Corporation Prepared By: Mike McCarthy, Public Works Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda - LCRB Information ISSUE Shall the LCRB award the contract for the Pavement Management Program Asphaltic Concrete Overlay to Knife River Corporation? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends that the LCRB award the contract for the Pavement Management Program Asphaltic Concrete Overlay to Knife River Corporation. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY This project includes pavement overlays and repair work on the following streets: Sequoia Parkway from Upper Boones Ferry Rd to Cardinal Ln Pfaffle Street from Hall Blvd to Pacific Hwy 99W 121st Avenue from Springwood Dr to Scholls Ferry Rd Springwood Drive within 100 feet east of 121st Ave 98th Avenue from Scott Ct to Greenburg Rd North Dakota St from Greenburg Rd to 95th Ave 72nd Avenue from Beveland St to Baylor St The pavement on each of these streets has deteriorated, due to traffic usage and weather, to the point where pavement repairs and overlays are necessary to avoid further deterioration and return the street to good condition. On July 15, 2010, the City issued an Invitation to Bid for the FY 2010 -11 Pavement Management Program Asphaltic Concrete Overlay project with an Engineer's Estimate of $458,000 based on unit pricing. The City closed the bid for the project on July 29, 2010 and received six responsible bids for the work. Knife River Corporation submitted a bid to the City in the amount of $533,471 for the full project which staff has reviewed and found to be a reasonable, responsible bid that is in line with market pricing for the work. The following are the six bids received: Knife River Corporation - $533,471 Brix Paving Company - $534,775 Kodiak Pacific Construction Co. - $560,937 Lakeside Industries Inc. - $564,378 Eagle- Elsner, Inc. - $613,893 K.F. Jacobsen, Inc. - $667,832 The recieved bids exceed the City's budget appropriations for the project. This is due in large part to an increase of just over 18% in the price of asphalt since the February ARRA- related overlays were bid. Staff, from information available at the time, used just under a 7% increase in asphalt prices in calculating the estimate for the project. Given this, staff is recommending that the 98th Avenue from Scott Ct to Greenburg Rd and the North Dakota St from Greenburg Rd to 95th Ave components of the project be removed from the project. Their removal is estimated to save roughly $75,000 and keep the City well within remaining budget appropriations. After a careful review of the submitted bids and with a need for the project work, staff recommends that the LCRB award the City's contract for the FY 2010 -11 Pavement Management Program Asphaltic Concrete Overlay project to Knife River Corporation for an amount not to exceed $475,000 which includes a small projected contingency of roughly $17,000. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The LCRB could reject this or all bids and direct staff on how to proceed. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS None DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Fiscal Impact Cost: $475,000 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where Budgeted (department/program): Street Maintenance Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: The annual Pavement Maintenance Program (PMP), of which the Asphaltic Concrete Overlay project is a piece, has an FY 2010 -11 budget of $827,900 in the Street Maintenance Fund. Approximately $325,490 of the total Street Maintenance Fund is committed to the City's Slurry Seal project ($315,490) and a pavement overlay on Garrett Street ($10,000). Given these two projects, $502,410 in capital improvement appropriations are available for work under this contract, which will fund staffs recommended work for this project. The remaining appropriations will be used as contingency for unanticipated change orders or delays. AIS -52 Item #: 4. Business Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Legislative Public Hearing to Consider Readoption of Revised Findings for the Urban Forestry Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA2008 -00002 Prepared By: John Floyd, Community Development Item Type: Public Hearing - Legislative Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Information ISSUE In 2008 the Council's adoption of Urban Forest Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPA2008- 00002) was appealed to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) by the Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland. The matter was in mediation until recently when a voluntary withdrawal was initiated to allow City Council's consideration of revised findings of fact. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends Council readopt the Urban Forest Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment, as previously approved under Ordinance 08 -08, subject to new findings contained in the staff report (Exhibit "A "), with any alterations that may be determined necessary through the public hearing process. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY On June 3, 2008 the City Council approved Ordinance 08 -08 adopting a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPA 2008 - 00002) to add Urban Forest background information and Goals, Policies, and Recommended Action Measures to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan as part of the Goal 2: Land Use Planning Chapter. This Comprehensive Plan Amendment serves as the "legislative foundation" for actions the City might take in protecting and /or managing Tigard' s urban forest resoruces. Following adoption of the Urban Forest text amendment by the City, the Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland (HBA) filed a Notice of Intent to Appeal to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on June 25, 2008. While the HBA did not provide a detailed written explanation for the basis of its appeal, the City determined HBA's actions were related to the potential insufficiency of the findings of fact and conclusions. In lieu of filing the record and proceeding to hearing before LUBA, the HBA and the City opted for mediation through a series of stipulated agreements. This mediation ended in June of this year when the City, in consultation with the HBA, chose to voluntarily withdraw the matter for City Council's reconsideration and re- adoption of the Amendment. In preparation for this reconsideration and re- adoption, staff has prepared revised findings of fact, which are found in Section IV of the staff report. These findings reference correspondence with the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) regarding the applicability of Statewide Planning Goals to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and an annotated bibliography of academic and professional articles documenting the benefits and services provided by trees and a functional urban forest. No change is proposed to the Comprehensive Plan language, only to the findings of fact that support the amendment. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Repeal Ordinance 08 -08, and remove Section 2: Tigard's Urban Forest from Goal 2 of the Comprehensive Plan. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Council Goal 1. Implement Comprehensive Plan DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION May 6, 2008 (Workshop on Urban Forest Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment) June 3, 2008 (Public Hearing on Urban Forest Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment) Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: N/A Attachments Attachment 1 - Ordinance Exhibit "A" - Staff Report I AGENDA ITEM No. 4 Date: August 10, 2010 SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET TESTIMONY FOR g Jibiabib SIGN -UP SHEETS (DATE OF MEETING) 44 Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before the City Council on: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2008 -00002 TO UPDATE THE GOALS, POLICIES, AND RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES PERTAINING TO TIGARD'S URBAN FOREST (A SUBSECTION OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 2: LAND USE PLANNING) APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: To re -adopt the Comprehensive Plan Amendment pertaining to Tigard's Urban Forest, subject to new findings of fact. LOCATION: Citywide ZONE: All City zoning districts APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan REVIEW Chapters Citizen Involvement, Land Use Planning, Natural Resources and Historic CRITERIA: Areas, Environmental Quality; Hazards, Parks, Recreation, Trails & Open Space; Economic Development, Housing, Public Facilities and Services; Metro Functional Plan Titles 3 and 13; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 13.. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council has Imposed a Five - minute Time Limit on Testimony I /Adm /Cathy /CCSignup /Leg. PH — Comprehensive Plan Amendment — CPA2008 -00002 AGENDA ITEM No. 4 August 10, 2010 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent — (Speaking In Favor) Opponent — (Speaking Against) Neutral Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. AIS -51 Item #: 5. Business Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Receive Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review Update Prepared By: Darren Wyss, Community Development Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Select One Information ISSUE Receive briefing on the City's progress to complete its Periodic Review Work Program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Receive briefing from staff. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Periodically, cities and counties are required to evaluate their comprehensive plans and land use regulations through a process called Periodic Review (ORS 197.628 -644 and OAR 660, Division 25). On May 20, 2008, the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) notified the City of the commencement of Periodic Review for Tigard. Staff then developed a Periodic Review work program, which was approved by City Council on January 27, 2009 and approved by DLCD on April 15, 2010. The City has three years from the DLCD approval date to complete all six tasks in the work program. The six tasks in the work program include: 1) Population and Housing Review; 2) Downtown Development Standards Update; 3) Economic Opportunities Analysis; 4) Public Facility Plan Update; 5) Transportation System Plan Update (TSP); 6) Population Forecast and Coordination with Metro. Work on three of the tasks has begun at this time. Work required under Task 2 - Downtown Development Standards Update, was concluded when Council approved the new Downtown Development Code in January 2010. It will be submitted to DLCD as a completed work program item by the end of August 2010. Task 5, the Transportation System Plan Update, was recommended by the Planning Commission in June 2010 for Council approval. It will be submitted to DLCD in October / November 2010 following Council work sessions and public hearings. Work required under Task 3 - Economic Opportunities Analysis, commenced in May 2010 and is scheduled to be completed and submitted to DLCD by May 31, 2011. The Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA) task is being funded by $35,000 from DLCD's Periodic Review Grant program and the City has contracted with Cogan Owens Cogan (COC) to assist the City in completing this task. The purpose of the project is to improve the chances that Tigard can get the type and quality of economic development desired by its citizens and achieve the goals of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. The general work program to complete the EOA includes: 1) Preparation; 2) Trends Analysis; 3) Site Suitability Analysis; 4) Inventory of Suitable Sites; 5) Assessment of Potential; 6) Implementation Policies. Please see Exhibit A for detailed information on the work program. The Tigard Planning Commission will help guide the project as the EOA advisory committee. The BOA advisory committee has met once to review the draft Community Economic Development Objectives ( CEDOs) and review a list of key stakeholders to be interviewed and the questions they will be asked. The CEDOs were gleaned from the recently updated Goal 9: Economic Development chapter of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and the interviews are intended to gather information that can enhance the CEDOs. Beginning in September 2010, the EOA advisory committee will meet on a monthly basis to review work products and provide guidance throughout the project. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS 1. Implement Comprehensive Plan 2. Implement Downtown Urban Renewal DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: The Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development has committed $35,000 from its Periodic Review Grant program to fund an Economic Opportunities Analysis. Cogan Owens Cogan has been hired to perform the work. The City is not required to provide matching funds, but will provide in -kind contributions of staff time and materials to aid in completing the project. Attachments Periodic Review Update Exhibit A Exhibit A Scope of Work 1, Goals and Objectives The overall purpose of the project is to improve the chances that Tigard can get the type and quality of economic development desired by its citizens, achieve the goals of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and create opportunities to meet the aspirations that have been developed during Metro's Making the Greatest Places process. Additionally, an updated Economic Opportunities Analysis will ensure the City of Tigard remains in compliance with Oregon Statewide Planning Goal 9 as the City goes through the Periodic Review process. This project will be completed during one - biennium and will help to meet objectives outlined by Tigard citizens and recently adopted into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. These objectives include: • The City shall establish strategies to retain and encourage the growth of existing businesses. • The City shall actively encourage businesses that provide family -wage jobs to start up, expand or locate in Tigard. • The City shall provide appropriately zoned lands and development regulations to accommodate a contemporary mix of economic activities. • The City shall engage with state and regional economic development organizations and agencies to sustain and expand its current economic activities and be prepared for future economic trends. 2. Products and Outcomes The outcome of the grant will be an adoption ready Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA). The BOA will be developed in compliance with OAR 660 Division 9 and be performed as part of the City's periodic review work program under the Economic Development task. The anticipated significant effect of the project is to help focus the City's efforts to grow its economy and maintain its quality of life. This will happen by ensuring an adequate supply of appropriately zoned land is available for existing businesses to expand and thrive and for new employers to utilize within the City of Tigard. 3. Work Program, Timeline, and Payment Task I. Preparation Purpose: Reduce cost and delay, anticipate obstacles, prevent surprises and keep planning activities aligned with local policy. Deliverables: 1. A locally approved Statement of Community Economic Development Objectives. 2. Evidence of support and coordination from key cooperating organizations and agencies. Schedule: May 2010 to June 2010 - Activities will include: A. Review Oregon's land use program with DLCD staff to understand key concepts. Review will include: i. OAR 660, division 9, Economic Development; ii. 660 -009- 0005(10) - Short -term supply of land; iii. 660 - 009- 0010(5) - Adequate planning effort; iv. 660- 009- 0020(1)(a) - Economic development objectives; v. OAR 660, division 24, Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB); vi. 660- 024 - 0040(5) - Employment land need; and vii. 660 -024- 0040(8) - Safe harbors. B. Prepare an informal draft Statement of Community Economic Development Objectives looking back at the economic history of the area and changes affecting that tradition, looking forward at new opportunities, and defining a series of actions to be taken to achieve a desired and sustainable result. C. Define a study area to analyze for economic and land use trends, which is typically a region sharing inter- dependent economic activity. Describe why the area was chosen and include a brief narrative about current conditions and activity. D. Def a planning area, which is typically the existing UGB and may include potential expansion and urban reserves. It is useful to describe why the area was chosen, and include a brief narrative about current conditions and activity. E. Gather and review any available regional economic development, employment data, real estate market data and area context information that has been published by entities such as: state and local governments, economic development agencies, ports and other development districts, the regional Business Development Officer for the Oregon Economic and Community Development Department, and Oregon's interagency Economic Revitalization Team. F. Meet with federal, state, regional and local economic development agencies to discuss cooperation, participation and possible sources of funding for planning and implementation activities. G. Identify typical planning and implementation policies, activities and tools, and gather evidence of support from key cooperating organizations (especially municipal and county boards and commissions, and Oregon's Economic Revitalization Team). Task 2. Trends Analysis Purpose: Identify economic development opportunities likely to expand or locate in the study area within the planning period. Determine the percentage of that employment growth reasonably expected within the planning area. Deliverable (milestone): An estimate of job growth associated with the economic development opportunities likely to expand or locate in the planning area within the planning period consistent with OAR 660 -024- 0040(5) - Employment Land Need. It will be based on review of employment forecasts from the Oregon Department of Employment, and a custom employment forecast prepared by a competent professional. Schedule: May 20I0 to July 2010 Activities will include: A. Review OAR 660 - 009 -0005 — Definitions, to understand key concepts and terms, and OAR 660 - 009- 0015(1) — Review of Economic Trends. B. Meet with Oregon Department of Employment staff to discuss employment trends in the Economic Opportunities Analysis study area. C. Review an employment forecast provided by the Oregon Department of Employment and have consultant produce a customized estimate of job growth to supplement the state data. D. Review national, state, regional, county, and local economic trend data including, but not limited to, population and job forecasts by sector over the planning period. E. Assess economic development potential by analyzing factors such as location, size and buying power of local and export markets for goods and services; workforce training opportunities; availability of transportation facilities for access and freight mobility; access to suppliers and utilities, including telecommunications; and other service infrastructure. F. Meet with local and state economic development professionals regarding local economic development potential for industrial and other employment opportunities in the study area. Incorporate results from interviews or consultations into the BOA. G. Acquire and incorporate information published by the Oregon Economic and Community Development Department documenting demand for sites in the study area that may not be reflected in the current employment data. Task 3. Site suitability analysis Purpose: Understand the types of sites needed to §uccessfully implement the Statement of Community Economic Development Objectives. Deliverable (milestone): Catalog of the range of site types suitable for the employment uses likely to expand or locate in the study area. Schedule: June 2010 to August 2010 Activities will include: A. Identify the employment land uses appropriate for the study area, based on results of the trend analysis. Include specific site sizes, special site requirements or other characteristics affecting the needed land supply such as a mixture of site sizes or sites with proximity to facilities. Also identify land needs that may arise from the expansion of existing businesses and the recruitment or location of new businesses into the study area. B. Acquire and incorporate information published by the Oregon Economic and Community Development Department that documents specific market -based development practices and site requirements that may affect the current inventory and need for additional suitable employment land. Task 4. Inventory of suitable sites Purpose: Determine the current availability of sites suitable for employment uses likely to expand or locate in the planning area. Deliverable (milestone): Inventory of available sites suitable for employment uses likely to expand or locate in the planning area within the planning period. Schedule: August 2010 to November 2010 Activities will include: A. Inventory and analyze the planning area's existing supply of industrial and other employment lands for development constraints which may include: wetlands, habitat areas, environmental contamination, topography, cultural resources, infrastructure deficiencies, parcel fragmentation, natural hazard areas, ownership patterns, and other suitability and availability criteria in order to determine the readiness of the current land supply for industrial and other employment development. The inventory will examine opportunities for redevelopment of existing sites, including sites in the core areas of cities. It will consider the cost of preparing land for the designated use as part of an BOA by including a residual value analysis as part of the analysis of development constraints. B. As part of any adjustment to an UGB for employment land, review employment land need and associated policies in OAR 660, division 024. OAR 660- 024 - 0040(5) requires a determination of the need for a short -term supply of land. OAR 660, division 9, encourages local governments to include policies relating to the short -term supply of land. Designation of short -term supply is described in OAR 660- 009- 0025(3). Task 5. Assessment of potential Purpose: Understand the process, and reduce the cost and risk associated with designating the amount of the employment land. Deliverable (milestone): An estimate of the need for employment land within the planning area for the planning period by category of site type. It will include a brief narrative of any identified process, cost or risk factors; and describe the community's ability to manage those factors. Schedule.' November 2010 to December 2010 Activities will include: A. Estimate the total number of sites needed in the study area for the planning period by categories of sites, based on information collected in the previous tasks. Include a minimum, maximum and most likely number of sites needed for each identified category within the planning period. B. Estimate the types and amounts of industrial and other employment uses likely to occur in the planning area. Refer to Assessment of Community Economic Development Potential in OAR 660- 009 - 0015(4). Include a brief narrative that explains the factors that determine the planning area's capture of employment growth in the study area. C. Identify pertinent planning, implementation, specific site, financial and real estate market process, cost and risk factors associated with the designation of additional employment land. D. Analyze the information gathered to estimate total number of sites by the various categories defined by the local government needed within the planning area for the planning period. Task 6. Develop detailed implementation policies based on completion of previous steps Purpose: Provide specific guidance to community leaders and staff. Deliverables (milestone): A list of recommended economic development implementation policies to be included in the comprehensive plan that were identified by the EOA process. Schedule: December 2010 to January 2011 Activities will include: A. Identify local government activities that will be needed to successfully implement the Statement of Community Economic Development Objectives. Include changes to the land supply, updates to comprehensive plans, additions to infrastructure facilities, new intergovernmental agreements, updated management practices, public- private partnerships, workforce training and adjustments to real estate economic factors. Include techniques to increase the community's ability to respond to economic development opportunities with speed and flexibility. B. Identify appropriate local government actions and investments of leadership, capacity, staff time, public finance tools and statutory authority needed to successfully implement the Statement of Community Economic Development Objectives. C. Identify available methods to fund local government activities that will be needed to successfully implement the Statement of Community Economic Development Objectives. D. Identify investments in infrastructure, workforce, amenities and other community improvements necessary in order to attract job growth. Demonstrate that methods are available and there is local commitment to fund the improvements. E. When using residual value analysis to justify an adjustment to the current supply of suitable sites, apply the same analysis to all sites proposed for changes of designation, including all proposed expansion sites outside the current UGB. Identify policies to correct residual value development constraints within the planning period, or reasonably demonstrate that correction is not possible. Residual value analysis is intended to remove from the short -term inventory, those industrial sites with a persistent negative residual value. These sites have development constraints that can't be resolved for the designated use by reasonable local government action. Task 7. Prepare final Economic Opportunities Analysis Purpose: Have an adoption ready EOA that satisfies the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 9. Deliverables (milestone): Final adoption ready City of Tigard Economic Opportunities Analysis. Schedule: January 2011 to March 2011 Activities will include: A. Present the draft EOA to the EOA Project Team and the regional Business Development Officer for the Oregon Economic and Community Development Department; receive and incorporate comments into final product. B. Formulate final EOA to satisfy DLCD grant requirements in accordance with the procedures provided in Oregon Administrative Rule 660 -009 -0015 — Economic Opportunity Analysis. Task 8. Final Adoption Purpose: Advise /participate in legislative process as budget allows. Deliverables (milestone): Final adoption of EOA and recommendations. Schedule: March 2011 to May 2011 AIS -40 Item #: 6. Business Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Receive Update on CIP Projects Prepared By: Kathy Mollusky, Public Works Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Select One Information ISSUE No action is required. The Council is being asked to receive an update on the CIP projects that are under construction. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Council accept the briefing and ask questions or comment on the status of the the projects. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY This months briefing will highlight two major projects: • Pacific Highway/ Greenburg Road/ Main Street/ and Hall Blvd intersection upgrade • 10 Million Gallon Reservoir Improvement and Transfer Pump Station Project The Pacific Highway project will add one new through lane in each direction and improve turning movements at both intersections. The 10 Million Gallon Reservoir project will replace a aging underground pump station and upgrade the reservoir so that it will last longer. Both projects have started construction. The update will include photos of work completed to date. OTHER ALTERNATIVES None COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Long-Term Council Goals Continue pursuing opportunities to reduce traffic congestion. The 10 Million Gallon Reservoir project implements needs identified in the water master plan. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Monthly update. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: Projects are fully funded in the City's OR Attachments Reservoir Improvements PowerPoint Construction Update PowerPoint 8/3/2010 10 Million Gallon Reservoir • Project Purpose Update — Preserve the reservoir CIP lJpdate eplace aging pump station 10 Million Gallon Reservoir Improvements Transfer Pum p Station Interim Pump Station Foundation Interim Pump Station c _ $ 1 • e The Pumping End New Piping E II 1 8/3/2010 Cin of Tigard • Pacific HMS- /Hall /Greenburg / Main Cin n/ Tigard • Pacific II%) /Hall /tired hurg /Main J' \ y • . -. " e it,iCt , ,d•. •s,; , w _ y Construction Update - . r.- City Council Meeting , 'dm .. ` , August 10, 2010 r , City Tigard • Pacifirlim /hall /G_rcenbure /Main CilynfTigard • Pacific lilt) /IIa1I /Greenhurg /Main liMillill Project Elements • Third Lane Each Direction on Pacific Hwy 1 S `•tv. , e • Turn Lanes on Each Side Street Approach ' ", • Safety Improvements- Geometry, Median, Etc •6, _ • Better Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Crossings ' r r • Stormwater Treatment 4•• • Landscaping and Aesthetic Improvements as Atili on' n(Tigard • Pacific ltm /hall /Greenhurg /Main City of Tigard • Pacific INT /Hall /Grec•uhurg /Alain Coming L ..J ` g' II '4 _ Attractions C . - - ( Spring 2011 • ,,,, liyprd nuo oft (' 1 8/3/2010 City of Tigard • Pacific Hwy Mall /Grianburg /Main City of Tigard • Pacific Ilm Mall /Greenh (Main • .. ti Gilt of Tigard • Pacific Hwy /Hall /Grecnburg /Main City cf Tigard • Pacific lkvy /flail /Greenburg /Main ;ii —. — . Vi Er City of Tigard • Pacific ilw■ /IUD /C,rcenburg /Main Ways to Stay Informed • Project Hotline 503 - 846 -7807 • Friday Coffees — 8:00am at McDonalds • http:// www .tigard- or.gov /pacifichwy_99w • http: / /twitter.com /99W_Tigard • Or Call Our Project Managers — Dan Erpenbach 503- 846 -7877 — Mike McCarthy 503- 718 -2462 M lii 2 AIS -98 Item #: 7. Business Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Ordinance Amending the TMC to Establish a Planning Commission Subcommittee as the Downtown Design Review Board and Resolution to Appoint Members Prepared By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Resolution Information ISSUE Shall Council approve an ordinance amending the Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 2.08 to establish a subcommittee of the Planning Commission to serve as the Downtown Design Review Board and approve a resolution appointing Planning Commissioner Karen Ryan and Planning Commission Alternates Donald Schmidt and Richard Shavey as members of the Design Review Board? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of the ordinance amending the Tigard Municipal Code and the resolution appointing members to it. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Downtown Design Code Amendments, adopted on January 26, 2010, include provisions for a Type III Discretionary Design Review process. This is an optional review procedure that applicants can choose and is meant to provide a "safety valve" for well- designed projects that can't meet the clear and objective standards of the Type II process. The review criteria (the building and site design objectives) are broad statements that could be achieved in multiple ways. A new review body, the Downtown Design Review Board (DDRB), was proposed as the review authority with discretion in deciding whether an application meets the criteria. The body would issue the final order, with findings and conclusions, to approve, approve with conditions, or deny applications. As with other Type III decisions, any appeal of a decision would be heard by the City Council. However, In the short term, due to the condition of the real estate market, staff believes that few applicants will choose to apply under this provision. Establishing a separate independent Downtown Design Review Board would create a citizen board with few duties. As an interim measure, staff proposes that a subcommittee of the Planning Commission be designated the Downtown Design Review Board. This subcommittee would meet as necessary and review Type III applications as needed. It would make recommendations on Type III applications to the whole Planning Commission. Council action is required to amend the Tigard Municipal Code to establish a subcommittee of the Planning Commission as the Downtown Design Review Board. This amendment of Chapter 2.08 (Planning Commission) would authorize Council to appoint this subcommittee, establish its minimum membership, and clarify that a subcommittee would constitute a quorum to make decisions (for Type IIIC applications only). The City Attorney has reviewed and concurs with this course of action. At the June 7 Planning Commission meeting, staff briefed the Planning Commission on this potential course of action. The Commission expressed support and Planning Commissioner Karen Ryan and Planning Commission Alternates Donald Schmidt and Richard Shavey have volunteered to serve on the subcommittee. They are proposed to be appointed to the Board and their terms on the Board would be identical to their Planning Commission terms. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Establish a separate independent Downtown Design Review Board. Staff will evaluate the proposed Planning Commission subcommittee arrangement in three years to determine if establishing a separate board is warranted. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Goal #2 - Implement Downtown Urban Renewal DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION On January 26, 2010, Council approved Ordinance 10 -02 which included the Development Code Amendment establishing Downtown Design Standards and a provision for a Type III Discretionary Review with a Downtown Design Review Board as the decision making authority. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: There is no fiscal impact fropm this action Attachments 98 8 -10 -10 Att 1 98_8 -10 -10 Design Review Ex A.docx 98_8 -10 -10 Design Review Att 2 AIS -124 Item #: 8. Business Meeting Date: 08/10/2010 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Boundary Clarification between the City of Tigard and Tualatin Valley Water District Prepared By: Kathy Mollusky, Public Works Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Information ISSUE Shall the City withdraw territory from the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD)? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Conduct a public hearing at the September 14, 2010, City Council meeting and then consider the proposed ordinance to withdraw territory from the TVWD. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY History: • City Council approved this boundary clarification at their November 17, 2009 Council meeting and held a public meeting approving Ordinance 09 -15 at the December 8, 2009 Council meeting. • This item is being brought before the Council again because one property was omitted from the published map. The withdrawal was not accepted by the Department of Revenue because of the missing property, so the original withdrawal was never completed. This is why we now need to redo the entire process. • This area (see map), while located in the TVWD boundary, was served by the Tigard Water District due to service pressure and flow issues at the time of original development in 1973. • That decision was memorialized in an agreement between Tigard Water District and Metzger Water District. Since that time this area has been taken over by the City of Tigard, and the TVWD was created from a merger of several districts, including the Metzger Water District. This "house- keeping" administrative action is based on the following: • City and District staff agree to clarify the boundary. • The City Attorney's office has advised staff that using the "withdrawal of territory" process as described in ORS 222.520 is appropriate for Tigard to use for this situation. • The proposed area for withdrawal is currently within the City and is served municipal water by the Tigard Public Works Department. • This area has not received any services from TVWD since 1973. • This action is proposed to correct the legal description of the area and clarify the existing water utility service boundary. • TVWD Board approved the recommendation to take action to clarify this boundary on September 9, 2009. • There is no impact to any residents or customers of the City or TVWD through this action. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could choose to not adopt the ordinance to withdraw territory from the TVWD. The City will continue to provide water service to this area. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS None DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION November 17, 2009 December 8, 2009 Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: There is a small cost in administrative and legal fees associated with executing the ordinance that will be paid within the existing Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2011. There is no other impact because we have been serving this area since 1973. This is a housekeeping measure to clean up the boundary in recognition of our long service to the area. Attachments Draft Ordinance Ex A Ex B Legal Description Public Meeting Notice TV WD Letter CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 10- AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING TERRITORY FROM THE TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT SUBSEQUENT TO ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD WHEREAS, from 1967 to 1976, the City annexed in to the City of Tigard the tracts of land described in Exhibits A, B -1 and B -2, attached hereto and hereby incorporated by reference and depicted on the attached maps; and WHEREAS the tracts of land described in Exhibits A, B -1 and B -2 were not Withdrawn from the Tualatin Valley Water District at the time of annexation (October 11, 1967 through .lanuary.2, 1976) or at any subsequent time; and WHEREAS, the City desires to withdraw from the Tualatin ValleyWater Distct the tracts of land described in Exhibits A, B -1 and B -2; and , '`"t ' . WHEREAS the City currently provides all services to the racts of land described in A, B -1 and 4 'NNE;, B -2 and s; °� :, i" z°� WHEREAS the City and District both recognize the need to provide legal blarification of the existing service area boundaries, annexations, and any prior agreements known and unknown between the two parties through the action of formal withdrawal• and '',..: . `� 0. P P k * . WHEREAS, ORS 222.520 provides that such withdrawals, nay be proces's any time after annexation to the City; and `, am? >e b.N` WHEREAS, on the da ofv��N ` " , ,.2010 the City and posted Notices of Hearing as required by 0,11 and :.,� WHEREAS, on the �k� `` da >of 20 the City held a hearing as required by ORS 222.524(1) for the purpose ofnearing bjections to the withdrawal and determining whether such withdrawal is in thhe b�estinteresto ,the City;�now; therefore, NOW THEREFORE,`' THE CC1TY OE,F1GARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Mir SEC�TION1'., The tracts of laridszdescribed.'in Exhibits A, B -1 and B -2 depicted on the attached maps are \ " to be withdrawni from the Tualatin Valley Water District. SECTION 2: The�,City Recorder shall immediately file a certified copy of this Ordinance with Metro and other agencies required by Metro Code. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective on the day of , 2010, as provided by ORS 222.465. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 2010. Page 1 — ORDINANCE NO Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Craig Dirksen, Mayor Lh- b Tim Ramis, City Attorney Date ,; z:, yA 'ti`, "x 1 x4 1 S : °:'. by �`` xti` °wb'y C *4 S ,. b `. a y - ^ '` 'Y' x"S h n'. ` ey - : °�, . °S.. `wbb.' . ` y`'s ° ` 0. 1 ,..., a.�, ~ 'S `. .,,. A im a'b`�x w Page 2 — ORDINANCE NO Exhibit A ;`ti; Tualatin Valley Water District Served by City of Tigard 7, A � e� ■, ®a!;z ;_ 111111 a 1-21.1_ � co .; 1 _ +•:gin • u • 1 —L � „ , G L I '1 I su �...`...:/ , RE� TV : ) - s i ,' _ -_ __ -_ N - `PAA ,r! I -:? -- 1 .--.:-. 1 - `` -; s y „ .. ; - ,,, .t ` wag - ;U it • co z. r F. /Y ,...0.0- - ;, '� +,--�� a ' k 1 ST �'Q G� r I —i3 1t ''4” VE:IRl i a - -lr. ° g . ,� \ ,,_ , •; ' �t1 7 5T�i 1 � " tt N- N 1 70 '..PL``� "��• i dl ; ' 0 DR I � , 1 S . ° 4m■ : RG� . } , ,,,:--, , ,,-, . ,,,, , , i f, :,., - ::: .,,, , -. r ,„„,,,-,...„„„,,,_ . 0 i. ‘.---. , „„ ( i , m eta ', , L a � 1 � O 'N � , • 1 L N, to ,,,, AO --' �'1{� TE � 2 Y 1,,' ' a b ,, ,,,,,_,,,,,__ _ . i _ I I '-- '1� /E. I •.-iii 1 I L �"� � t �+ . . ,# .�9,: C iv •5 ,. 7§ � ...._. - �:.BRCOKLII�EL >, N� - I l 1 - Ya ti .i ,6E s 0 1 C� CKLEWEE s 1 s II _ – J � �" 4 i r - r � : �6ID WIN EG� ii "d d 1 10 A� I t r, 4. 1 BONiT W1 1 r h )_ s t t. =t ° .o" t+ _ I i w_ T z 1— I ' 1\ ' { s .-„ j - I I • Ior�, ,, - z m.> : # .,,, , a .MEADOW ric-,• u ha 1 v . - C ■ RU ._ 1 I __ .1 Zr' °'a c , l E , _Ni " •ORN r_ 1. _, k r " , P RTRIDGB t0 4C 1 . _ ' �.!_ iI j a � . -___ _ " a �.,, y 'k r¢ < �' car , , -(� a r .S HEViPARK_ i s .J t , ,� f I ■ s J J i j - I ` ENT LE -- 1,, `i I \., ` , a" - - 1 gl vDS , i ,.,, ,..:•, i , . e. _ ill.. - n 7- I{- I __:..._ .. ...„. r ; iii I [ � �- 1"" �• c-1-1 •,� - .--_- l 25,E I _— •- - I L 1 V ‘%,i•-t.' „ ", 7, -� s :E. 11 n 1. Ci - I ® [. ,.' 1 . -._. x . 1 . 1 . 1 . . W AY 1 � _ " ,,. - S C `E I i EXHIBIT E -'I !:[J I j /,', —,..„.a.:6:-.14: L. 67-6! I, 6 68�:ri ' I R' -- � Wi ST idi ; ^\ � (10 11-67) « I + I sa f,,, .a.. s = u -- t7 K t I c ;: 1► ' t a''� t K' i- r. i s..s r r 1 �. ' ', r 5 BC 87T 74 . ac. I 0 e : . 8B ° �' O 6 9 •! i' (I 3 7fl N (1/-4- 0) ( 701 f a r l ' s`� .. ORD G- ORD. 68-69 : - t -� _ � ` OFt2 P;'..34-: " lift:Rik .(416. = 41-6-68) ` �,0 D 68 a9 II 6-663 z r ,.,. � , .::: 677 =`q (,r1;` e_ �. a /i Z.0 f ,t.. < . - ,t an 1t !J1- _ 1 \ iN, .2.111 4:J.:to r.,,,,t;t; ( - i'` a�.!S" ORD. 67 -34 I imimmi e : t-i. _ Iiii41, i:ip i .-.... --- \ 3 sk3i , . • , Iii_:L:', ...,,-..i..„.einiy. ,,„:*--...„,,e11). - ' t x�a �a y , � \\ \ OR A. 67-34 — `' » \ ' '►RD. 66 -I8 (9 21-67) ; t 4-14 -663 B: Or' !i kTO3.677.43 n «a z ' s N. OR[l 6: - A10, '1 - ;';, \ 'x (2-14' ,i,._, ,:., ly 1.4- G:00 I\ \ - -" v. ` 63»114.00 :;T1 �, OR A. 67 -45 `isg'"az.00 `:� (: -t7 -6T) ORD. 67-34 ., :410•t51.uu / �. (5 II -fi7) '(br@Jino.oa \ ' 1111 :ro 3. 710.00 111111111111111111 EtC-22 -- : \ �`� = , f4 -f4 -GO ; N p r FL ' ORD. 68-68 '' 0-111 f (1I -6 -68) B.C. 363 rt INIII .111 ' � IIII 44 � b Y • �' t I um... `" .,.r.]-'fF-z�' -r you :i' t la t i t I r ' " x / � "pl 68 ^31 III 1 tt f`Y C S I it 1 1 0. . Yt f , il � tz, � � 8 = • (6- 23 -68) Ili r , OR iii i HIM ' ; �� % \ � ; ' �\, : NE r. r +r�nm�l . 1. rur+U: in �� l 1) I[ 1 1 ' - ` � ; ` �� % , � /' ■■�. � C lii-3.V I .1< -- -9---\_. / u�ut, .�c,NVEr r " ` .'� / / :, - .. 'g14i 7Yt .: ..�....0 g %3 �,{{ ,}' 3! -s1' nP r i- 'y' ' 1i " - I R r - -- _ �/ t fyk. � ~.�.Ui.Fk.�� +1�+.1 s♦v..: l..s.":.!, zh. +-1 � i {i �'.`.Sii.i�Z C'! Y��.,.der �— �.��, � £∎ l 1 ..ei : .i s; � }c'zar ` �t"haT tau ::E.,at ,.!.fiii 4S�s: :i "tr' . � ..s,.. t:�:: - :'t., ^ rr� .. �:[s yJ. sad .. *; z s i'1`t-E dr r'i s `s. !S ,r uh . °2--r -. aik +. °rii}iN -3.,.....i'" ;, .r tVe y a *f' r".; a 42,.. n . nx�c'•i-Zr� tom �-r_.t V._ _ ^:.ICSi 3�..= ... -11. .. . 3 Z2' � r:� -:.�1f ?:r;a;, -s. .... - - : * .; C�1 ` - 1; - - � . �` lr} e i �� r �� M �3 y � ' 7 try 5� r� �°' \! ktt i . _ '"4 - - 4- . "a .4 a t r- i -Yt7 . '-‘,10?-4,,f.- t!' ri's! - - - 6 01 � r . , .: r ,t. j ii .� : t:-, pq fir` : h. a. t tt • - r' : { 4 � tt 5 ` + 1 . `1 13/ =.r -. r la c Y x.. } z �;i :r c. ss.r ti �' In I t} v ci M ED I ` o r -�,° a,. §. ; � .# Y fit,' r 1 / f I - c : `y —. J)I W ,, m t o Q N k \� ' , E.J'v �� 1 to , to nom o" N i � a -; • m 0 m ti \ ;. \ - {� 1 W �.m M - � - � � \ I = ,,`fi g _N � � �� ,..\\„\k\ m k _ p I� \ / \ % x 1 1 2 . ‘ / = J ... -,. \\ ..r,,,,-._- „, q/ r s ..,_ , l,•-.'� ,R1 •,313 _ n1 . (1V(lll�ivl! 3A„ %i.: + SIc \ r Sy/N. 1_ i / . � \ / �./� T m 1/ 19 :,./ / 1 i _e.. 4. r....i ( itiiID C1=1 Can Co Ilh-V-14.:Ut ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION A tract of land situated in the Section 1, Township 2 South Range 1 West Willamette Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Lot 1 Rolling Hills, thence N 87° 22' 15" W, along the north line of said lot 1 a distance of 22.43 feet to the southerly line of Hwy 217 and the true point of beginning; thence along said southerly right -of -way the following 6 courses; thence N 02° 38' 39" E a distance of 38.95 feet; thence N 55° 26' 49" W a distance of 113.70 feet; thence N 31° 09' 54" W a distance of 439.81 feet; thence N 54° 36' 15" W a distance of 220.59 feet; thence N 71° 52' 40" W a distance of 52.52 feet; thence N 72° 03' 28" W a distance of 113.88 feet; thence N 88° 37' 36" W, leaving said southerly right -of -way, a distance of 188.93 feet to a curve to the right; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 220.00 feet, a central angle of 9° 26' 16" (a chord which bears N 83° 54' 28" W,36.20 feet) and a length of 36.24 feet; thence N 02° 15' 23" W a distance of 7.02 feet; thence N 70° 14' 03" W a distance of 339.67 feet; thence S 02° 48 45" W a distance of 736.05 feet to the north line of Rolling Hills; thence S 87° 50' 15" E, along said north line a distance of 329.79 feet; thence N 02° 28' 15" W, leaving said north line a distance of 340.26 feet; thence S 87° 43' 39" E a distance of 335.16 feet; thence S 02° 49' 00" W a distance of 342.21 feet to the north line of Rolling Hills; thence S 87° 22' 15" E, along the north line of Rolling Hills, a distance of 576.18 feet; to the true point of beginning Containing 11.94 Acres Also including: A tract of land situated in the Section 1 and Section 12, Township 2 South Range 1 West Willamette Meridian described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 36 Rolling Hills No. 2; thence N 40° 24' 47" W, along the southerly line of Rolling Hills No. 2, a distance of 244.56 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1 Tech Center Business Park; thence S 02° 39' 40" W, along the west line of said Lot 1, a distance of 502.22 feet to the easterly right -of -way of Southern Pacific Railroad; thence along said easterly right -of -way the following 7 courses; thence S 40° 15' 49" E a distance of 222.13 feet; thence S40° 32' 32" E a distance of 726.18 feet to a point of curve of a curve to the right; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 2736.33, a central angle of 24° 23' 42" (a chord which bears S 28° 20' 41" E, 1156.28 feet) and a length of 1165.06; thence S 16° 08' 50" E a distance of 3236.70 feet; thence S 17° 21'40" E, along an offset spiral, a distance of 321.75 to a point of curve to spiral; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 2496.43 a central angel of 4° 04' 26" (a chord which bears S 21° 50' 26" E, 177.46 feet) and a length of 177.50 feet to the south west corner of Lot 4 Pacific Corporate Center; thence N 51° 49' 41" E, along the south line of Pacific Corporate Center, a distance of 408.32 feet; thence N 60° 21' 32" E, along the south line of Pacific Corporate Center, a distance of 20.23 feet; thence N 51° 49' 41" E, along the south line of Pacific Corporate Center, a distance of 174.73 feet; thence N 25° 27' 49" E, along the east line of Pacific Corporate Center also being on the west line of Interstate 5, a distance of 218.70 feet; thence N 19° 43' 34" E, along the east line of Pacific Corporate Center also being on the west line of Interstate 5, a distance of 313.98 feet; thence N 19° 30' 11" E, along the east line of Pacific Corporate Center also being on the west line of Interstate 5, a distance of 486.48 feet; thence N 05° 19' 16" E, along the east line of Pacific Corporate Center also being on the west line of Interstate 5, distance of 556.57 feet; thence N 01° 13' 48" E, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 1015.48 feet; thence N 01° 13' 48" E, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 491.73 feet; thence N 18° 52' 52" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 101.79 feet; thence N 01° 13' 48" E, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 819.80 feet; thence N 04° 18' 06" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 566.41 feet; thence N 21° 17' 48" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 40.20 feet; thence N 20° 28' 46" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 62.45 feet; thence N 21° 36' 01" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 67.63 feet; thence N 29° 01' 31" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 68.37 feet; thence N 37° 19' 19" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 63.53 feet; thence S 89° 34' 11" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 129.43 feet; thence N 01° 13' 48" E, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 13.15 feet; thence N 27° 15' 59" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 261.29 feet; thence N 09° 07' 42" E, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 185.81 feet; thence N 24° 57' 29" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 175.05 feet; thence N 43° 34' 48" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 303.38 feet; thence N 31° 17' 57" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 423.23 feet; thence N 34° 59' 47" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 361.89 feet; thence S 02° 08' 01" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 77.42 feet; thence N 33° 54' 40" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 226.41 feet; thence N 36° 40' 41" W, along, west line of Interstate 5 a distance of 84.78 feet; thence N 46° 53' 17" W, along, south line of highway 217, a distance of 106.92 feet; thence N 58° 41' 57" W, along, south line of highway 217, a distance of 56.84 feet; thence S 85° 56' 57" W, along, south line of highway 217, a distance of 15.63 feet; thence S 02° 33' 09" W, along, south line of highway 217, a distance of 7.62 feet; thence N 87° 39' 05" W, along, south line of highway 217, a distance of 22.00 feet; thence S 84° 48' 31" W, along, south line of highway 217, a distance of 190.00 feet; thence S 72° 38' 31" W, along, south line of highway 217, a distance of 77.16 feet; thence S 40° 31' 21" W a distance of 139.29 feet to the southeast corner of lot 30 Rolling Hills; thence S 87° 43' 15" W, along, south line Rolling Hills, a distance of 629.72 feet; thence S 02° 03' 55" W, along, east line Rolling Hills, a distance of 311.04 feet; thence S 87° 24' 15" E a distance of 625.22 feet to the west right -of -way of SW 72 Ave; thence S 02° 30' 37" W, along said west right -of -way, a distance of 20 feet; thence S 87° 24' 00" E, along said west right -of -way, a distance of 8.97 feet; thence S 04° 15' 37" W, along said west right -of -way, a distance of 138.06 feet; thence S 87° 24' 00" W , along said west right -of- way, a distance of 4.75 feet; thence S 02° 30' 37" W, along said west right -of -way, a distance of 530.50 feet; thence N 87° 21' 15" W a distance of 280.08 feet; thence S 02° 32' 45" W a distance of 88.00 feet to the south line of Rolling Hills No. 2; thence N 87° 21' 15" W a distance of 819.96 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 254.41 Acres ' ` ' ~' City of Tigard ill 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Posted August 11, 2010 Public Meeting Notice Date: Tuesday, September 14 at 8:30 p.m. Address: Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard ORS 222.524 Withdrawal of Territory from the Tualatin Valley Water District Subsequent to Annexation to the City of Tigard A Public Meeting will be held at 8:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 14 in the Town Hall Conference Room. This public meeting will allow citizens to provide testimony to City Council regarding this proposed corrective administrative action to legally recognize the present existing utility service boundary and withdraw territory from the Tualatin Valley Water District. The meeting will determine whether it is in the City's best interest to complete this "housekeeping" action by ordinance to withdraw territory from Tualatin Valley Water District at the very southern tip of the Metzger area (south of Highway 217, west of I -5, north of Boones Ferry Road and east of the railroad right of way as noted in Exhibits A, B -1 and B -2). Background: The proposed area for withdrawal is currently within the city limits of Tigard and is served municipal water by the City of Tigard. It receives no municipal water service from Tualatin Valley Water District. All water services including meter reading, billing and collection is provided by the City of Tigard. This action is proposed to correct the legal description of the area and clarify the existing water service utility boundary between Tigard and Tualatin Valley Water District. There is no impact to residents or customers through this action. For more information, contact Dennis Koellermeier, Public Works Director, 503 -718 -2596 or dennis( tigard- or.gov. Post: Tigard City Hall Tigard Permit Center Tigard Public Works Building Tigard Public Library .. . . .. .... ._...._ - - ilidatin Vall Water Distiict, or tcf• -..--- ...... :,.....3 •--fir . ....:4• 1850 SW 170' Ave. 0 Beaverton, Oregon 97006 c Phone (503) 6424.511 0 Fax: ( 699-2733 0 www.tywd.org Gregofy E. DiLoteto General Manager DATE Bernice Begnall chieFinancial Officer Debra Erickson tiftmager, Huthan NAME Resources <Addies§? CITY 8.T.A.TE DaleTishback Manakar, Operations & Field Services Dear <Nanie> Todd Heidgerken A C9h°61 YOU h beard that the City of T• ard • ' the f d tin 't wate • may have ear a e i o Tigard is in e process o • up a gis wa et service — ,ntergavernmethe, , .. . . . . . Relations boundary in the area near you We want to assure you that Since you currently receive your , water bill frona atin Valley Water:District; you Will licit be.affedted by this change. and Mark Knudson you will refilain a TVWD Water Ctistother. Chief Engineer The properties highlighted in the map on the back of this letter have historically been 01 renda Lennox as being wilhinTVWIPs service area; hoWever theseprOpertieshave received l .vfeinnkee Customer Water service from the City of Tigard, for about 30 years : The City of Tigard and TVWD are & Support Seitt currently in the process of updating water s ervice maps of the Bte.a to reflect actual .Serviee', . gp4s and formally show that water fortese and billed by the City of Tigra. As part Of this process, these properties will soon be ofOcially anne?cedhato the City of Tigard, • The propOsedUpdate to the water service area map, will not impact your property or water ser : You will continue to rem am a TVWD customer and your water service will not change in any. way. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the: We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with quality water and :Customer. service - kith now and in the future. • Sincerely, Mark Knudson Chief Engineer (03) 848.3027 itiatkkOtkWd.org S WATER - not lo'be talten forgranted: 1 City of Tigard, Oregon : Affidavit of Posting o T I GAIT In the Matter of the Proposed Ordinance(s) (0 / ( Q I fD ,` a STALE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, E.,) o n 4 � (' ti � -c v , being first duly sworn (or affirmed); by oath (or affirmation), depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Numbers) i n 0 - 1 ( N. lo--1 a. , which were adopted at the City Council meeting of / 4"U6L. I / 4 " with a copy(s) of said Ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the • if day of 4 tip % , 20 /Q . 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. Tigard Public Library, 13500 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 3. Tigard Permit Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon j y -rdilA 1/ Signature of Person who Performed Posting Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me this / / day of 66 1- , 20 / . ; , CAROLA KRAQER Signature of Notary Public for Oregon NOTARY'PUSUC OREO N COMMISS NO.4445g6g MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEBRUARX 23, 2014 I:tadmicathy\forms\post ordinance 2006.doc