The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 01/05/2010 Revised 1/4/10 — Agenda Item No. 3 Removed Park and Recreation Advisory Board Discussion and Replaced this item with Update on the Urban and Rural Reserves Process City of Tigard oywoyota ThGMD Tigard Special Business Meeting - Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 5, 2010/6:30 p.m. Special Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard — Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign -up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 6:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503 - 639 -4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503 - 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead - time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503 -639 -4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503 - 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). CABLE VIEWERS: The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. SEE A'f1'ACHED AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — January 5, 2010 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1 503 - 639 -4171 1 www.tigard- or.gov 1 Page 1 of3 City of Tigard y Tigard Special Business Meeting 1 Agenda g p g g TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE /TIME: January 5, 2010/6:30 p.m. Special Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard — Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. SPECIAL BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council, Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for. Non - Agenda Items 2. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING — REVISED STREET MAINTENANCE FEE The City of Tigard invites public comment on the proposed modification of its Street Maintenance Fee, replacing Ordinance No. 09 -14 adopted by the City Council on December 8, 2009. A public hearing has been scheduled for January 5, 2010, at 6:30 p.m., Tigard Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Interested persons will be able to comment on the proposed amendment to the Street Maintenance Fee to be phased in over the next 3 years beginning July 1, 2010. a. Open Public Hearing b. Review Hearing Procedures: City Attorney c. Declarations or Challenges: Does any Council member wish to declare or discuss a conflict of interest or abstention. d. Staff Report: Finance & Information Services Department e. Public Testimony Proponents Opponents £ Staff Recommendation g. Council Questions h. Close Public Hearing i. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 09 -, Ordinance No. 09 -, and Resolution No. 09- TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - January 5, 2010 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard- or.gov 1 Page 2 of3 3. UPDATE ON URBAN AND RURAL RESERVES PROCESS a. Staff Report: Community Development Department 4. REVIEW DRAFT GOALS, FIVE -YEAR GOALS, LONG -TERM GOALS AND COUNCIL TASKS a. Introduction: Mayor Dirksen b. City Council Discussion c. City Council Direction to Staff; City Council to Formally Consider Adoption on January 12, 2010 5. NON - AGENDA ITEMS 6. ADJOURNMENT I: ADM \CATI- IY \CCA \2010 \100105 business.doc TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — January 5, 2010 City of Tigard I 13125 SW'Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1 503 - 639 -4171 1 www.tigard- or.gov 1 Page 3 of3 • ed Agenda Item # Meeting Date January 5, 2010 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title Legislative Public-Hearing — Revised Street Maintenance Fee Prepared By: Toby LaFrance Dept Head Approval: e ` City Mgr Approval: ` ISSUE BEFORETHE COUNCIL Should the City of Tigard repeal the ordinance and resolutions passed on December 8, 2009 for the Street Maintenance Fee (SMF) for the Pavement Management Program and replace them with the updated proposed ordinance and resolutions? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached ordinance and resolutions amending Chapter 15.20 — Street Maintenance Fee, the Master Fees and Charges Schedule, and the Pavement Condition Index Goal for City Streets. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Pavement Management Program (PMP) is an annual program that provides for the preventative and /or corrective maintenance of Tigard city streets. This program is funded by the Street Maintenance Fee (SMF). The current fee was adopted by in 2003 by Ordinance 03 -10. The ordinance requires a periodic review of the PMP and the fee required to fund the program. Staff started the review with Council during a Workshop on October 21, 2008 and held eight subsequent meetings over a fifteen -month period. In addition, the Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force (TFSTF) held eight monthly meetings that•included discussion of the PMP and SMF resulting in their recommendation that was brought to Council during the September 15 Workshop. At the December 8, 2009 Public Heating, Council passed Ordinance 09 -14 and Resolutions 09 -76 & 09 -77 adopting an updated SMF. The action was based on Council direction from the Workshop on September 15, 2009. Per the minutes from the Workshop, the direction from Council includes: • We will establish a goal of a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) between 70 and 75. • The street maintenance fee is the preferred means for funding the PMP. • We will -spend the modeled amounts on asphalt and right of way; the amount between residential and non- residential is unchanged. • The way we will split the. fees for residential and non - residential users is unchanged from the TFSTF recommendation with the exception of a higher cap in trading a reduction for smaller businesses. • We will not directly fund a rainy day fund; however, we will look at ways that we can take some cost savings to create a reserve. • We will retain the reduction for religious institutions. • Other non -profit institutions will not be allowed a reduction. • The cost will be indexed similar to Washington County's transportation development tax. • We will have a phasing in over a three -year period. The last two of those years will include the right -of -way maintenance. • We will have an evaluation of the program after one full year of implementation. At the December 8, 2009 Hearing, Council took public testimony from Tigard residents, the Northwest Grocers Association, and Downtown business owners. Key messages from the testimony include: • Right -of -Way maintenance is important; • In the current economy, the fee is too high, especially on business; • Raising the cap on larger businesses to 250 spaces is desirable and more equitable to small business; • An index that permits inflationary increases of up to 10% is too high; and • The appeals process is too narrow. Since the December 8, 2009 Hearing, members of Council and city staff have worked with members of the Northwest Grocers Association and Downtown business owners to bring an updated proposal to Council that address the concerns raised during testimony. Key aspects in this proposal are: • A lower fee increase. The fully implemented fee will decline from $6.01 to $5.25 per month for Tigard residents and from $2.42 to $1.19 per required parking space per month for non - residential customers. This is the fee prior to inflationary adjustments. • The PMP will be curtailed. Instead of slowly increasing Tigard's average PCI, once fully implemented, the fee will fund enough maintenance to hold the line on Tigard's asphalt condition. • When modeling the cost of the PMP, a more recent cost of paving is being used. • The cap on large businesses remains at 250 required parking spaces. • When distributing the cost of the PMP, residential customers will pay for 3 /8ths of the cost of maintaining arterial roads. Previously, this was paid 100% by the fee charged to non - residential customers • Improving Right —of -Way maintenance on arterials and collectors is still part of the program. The amount for Right -of -Way maintenance has been reduced to $100,000 and will be paid for by the fee charged to residential customers. • The three -part phase in of the fee is adjusted to occur on July 1, 2010, April 1, 2011, and finish January 1, 2012. • The index is adjusted to move from an annual index to a 2 -year average index and the cap is 7% with a floor of 2 %. • The appeals process now allows for an existing land use decision that altered the required parking to be considered as part of a requested review of the charge. The changes since the December 8, 2009 Hearing are outlined in Attachment #5, which provides a crosswalk from the change to where that change can be found in the Resolutions and Ordinances. The result will be an improved PMP. The compromise of the lowering the fee and three part phasing will allow area businesses three years to work the fee increases into their business plans and will ease the impact of the fee increase during difficult economic times. Once fully implemented, the PMP should be able to fund enough maintenance to hold the line and maintain a citywide average PCI around 67. Tigard still will maintain a long -term goal of a PCI between 70 and 75 and the goal will be considered in later adjustments to the PMP. • OTHER ALTERNATIVES "CONSIDERED 1. Maintain the action taken on December 8, 2009. 2. Repeal the action taken on December 8, 2009 and return to the prior ordinance and funding level. This would require Tigard to adopt a lower goal for Tigard's average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and fund more expensive maintenance at a later date; or fund the PCI goal by cutting other Tigard services or diverting revenue away from projects that reduce congestion. CITY COUNCIL GOALS N/A ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment #1: A Resolution repealing Resolution 09 -76 and establishing a long -term average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) goal for City streets. Attachment #2: The Ordinance repealing Ordinance 09 -14 and amending the Chapter 15.20 of the Tigard Municipal Code establishing the Street Maintenance Fee. Attachment #3: A Resolution repealing Resolution 09 -77 and amending the portion of the Master Fees & Charges Schedule pertaining to the Street Maintenance Fee including Exhibit A. Attachment #4: Graph of Tigard Citywide Pavement Condition Index by Funding Scenario from 2006 to 2015. Attachment #5: Crosswalk of Street Maintenance Fee Issues, Changes in Ordinances, and Where to Find Changes. FISCAL NOTES When fully implemented, the fees will fund a $1.8 million program with $1.7 million going to maintain street surfaces and $100,000 going to right -of -way maintenance. The amount of the program will be adjusted by a combined construction cost index and a labor cost index. The fee increase will be implemented over three phases with the street surface portion evenly increased over all three phases and the right —of -way maintenance evenly implemented during the last two phases. The result of the phased implementation is below. Year 1: The first year phasing of the Street Maintenance Fee will yield a total of $3.01 per unit for residential properties, and $0.92 per parking space for non - residential properties. Year 2: The second year will yield $4. per unit for residential and $1.06 per parking space for non - residential. Year 3: The third year is estimated to generate $5.25 per unit for residential and $1.19 per parking space for non - residential. The second and third phase includes the cost for right -of -way maintenance in addition to costs for road surface. Also, the second and third phase reflects costs before any indices are applied. I: Citywide \Council Packets \ Packet '10 \100105 \AIS -SMF Fee Increase 01052009.docx • Attachment 5 Crosswalk of Street Maintenance Fee Issues, Changes in Ordinance, and Where to Find Changes Public Hearing January 5, 2010 Issue . Action from 12/8/09 - Lb„:07,06117 , 7%. Fee is too Non-Res=$2.42 per space Non-Res=$1.19 per Attachment #3: Exhibit A high per month. space per month. Residential=$6.01 per Residential=$5.25 per residence per month residence per month Size of As recommended by "Hold the Line". PCI Attachment #1: Resolution program TFSTF, reaching goal PCI will be held at 67 with a establishing PCI short term of 70-75 in nine years. less expensive program and long term goal Asphalt Price $80/ton $65/ton Attachment #3: Resolution on Master Fee Schedule WHEREAS section. Cap on large Over 250 spaces Over 250 spaces Attachment #2: SMF business Ordinance TMC 15.20.050.1(d) Distribution Arterial = 100% non-res, Change Arterial to 62% Attachment #2: SMF of program 0% res; Collector=50% non-res & 38% res Ordinance TMC 15.20.050.1(b) costs each; Residential=0% non- (3/8ths) res, 100% res; Industrial =100% non-res, 0% res Right of Way $300,000 spread across all $100,000 paid by Attachment #3: Resolution on Maintenance users residential Master Fee Schedule WHEREAS section. Phase in Annually over 3 years with 3 part phase in starting Attachment #2: SMF ROW in last 2 years of July 1, 2010 and ending Ordinance TMC 15.20.050.3 phase in January 1, 2012. Index Annual adjustment based Annual adjustment Attachment #2: SMF on 65% Construction Cost based on 2-year rolling Ordinance TMC 15.20.050.4 Index and 35% Bureau of average of 65% Labor Index. Cap of 10% Construction Cost and floor of 1%. Index and 35% Bureau of Labor Index. Cap of 7% and floor of 2%. Appeals Limited to required Now includes land use Attachment #2: SMF parking as outlined in decisions that modifies Ordinance TMC 15.20.080.2 TMC 18.765. required parking 1101 I CO1 UNITY SPAPE 6605 SE Lake Road, Porland, OR 91222 • PO Bu 22109 •Povlaod, OR 97269-2109 Phone: 503 -684 -0360 Fax: 50320 -3432 ' E -mail: legals @commaewspapers.com � NOTICE OF PUBLIC.HEARING , : • STREET;MAINTENANCE FEB AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION , 7 MODIFICATIONS State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS The City , of Tigard invites 'public, ,comment , I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, on the :proposed :modification of ifs ''Street T I GA RD MamtenanceFee, replacing Ordin mce'No 09 depose and say that 1 - am the Accounting 14 adoptgd by: the City, Council on December Manager of The Times (serving Tigard, 8;,;2009: A public hearing; been scheduled Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of for. January 5, 201:0, at 6:30 pm: Tigard Town Hall;. 1 3125` , general circulation, published at Beaverton, in SW Half Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon., ,.Interested =.persons wi • the aforesaid county and state, as defined by :he -able to ,com on the proposed, amendment' to the Street` ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that Maintenance Fee to :be :phased in over the.next 3 years` beginning July°'1 20.10 : - collected, are and w continue. to be` used:• .'by the Pavement. Management, Program for the corrective and City of Tigard preventative maintenance of Tigard city streets`: -. Notice of Public Hearing Publish 12/31/2009 , , • 'TT11396,'' Street Maintenance Fee Modifications TT11396 A copy'of'which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for 1 ' week in the following issue: December 31, 2009 COYLok Charlotte Allsop (Accounting Man r) Subscribed and sworn to before me this December 31,, 2009. OFFICIAL SEAL 0 MVCO0SM6 ESSGC F EOS 2013 NOTARY PUBL IC FOR O ON My commission expires Acct #.10093001 Attn: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd - Tigard, OR 97223 Size: 2 x 2.5 Amount Due $41.75 *Please remit to the address above. • SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR n . 3 a9 /0 (DATE OF MEETING) AGENDA ITEM No. 2 Date: January 5, 2010 TESTIMONY SIGN -UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: REVISED STREET MAINTENANCE FEE This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses ofpersons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints there is a 3- minute Time Limit on Testimony I /Adm /Cathy /CCSignup /Leg. PH Street Maint Fee T t. T AGENDA ITEM No. 2 January 5, 2010 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent — (Speaking In Favor) Opponent — (Speaking Against) Neutral Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Addres & Phone No. � v ' _ s ■A- /DI 3r Si. Si 71 ° 6 c� C_ e Lac Vc ()s 9 10,? y a.�� h 1,0 eccZ Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Agenda Item No. Meeting of /In COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM. SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title: Update on the Urban & Rural Reserves Process, CG #1(d) Prepared By: John Floyd Dept Head Approval: . City Mgr Approval: ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Receive information regarding recent milestones achieved in the Urban and Rural Reserves Process, implications to Tigard's long term growth, and forthcoming events which are expected to result in the adoption of binding reserves designations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Receive information and provide, if desired, feedback to Metro prior to the close of the public comment period on January 25, 2010. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY On, December 17, 2009 a draft map and associated IGAs were released by the Core 4 for public review and comment. The present comment period is intended to inform final decisions that will be made by Metro in February. This "regional, best effort proposal would place approximately 24,000 acres of land in Urban Reserves, and 'approximately 224,000 acres of land in Rural Reserves, across the three- county region. While much of the map is the result of consensus, there remain nine areas where specific options, are still under consideration pending additional public comments. None of these are in or adjacent to Tigard. Of direct relevance to Tigard is the fact that•approximately 350 acres of the approximately 888 acres of land contained in Tigard's proposed candidate Urban Reserve area, has been reclassified from Urban Reserve to Rural Reserve. This change was made in the Northwest corner of the candidate area, and allows' for the "double - loading" of Roy Rogers Road with urban development, while limiting urban expansion to the West. It should be. noted that Tigard is not the only City °to see a reduction in Urban Reserve candidate areas, as the Core 4 has significantly reduced urban reserves across Washington and Clackamas Counties over the past few months of negotiations. Of interest is the fact that while Tigard's Urban Reserve areas have been pushed further to the east, lands immediately north of Scholls Ferry Road (and in the City of Beaverton) remain unchanged in an Urban Reserve designation. Changes to the Tigard candidate area can be found on maps contained in Attachment 1, which show the progression of change to Tigard's candidate lands and the broader region in general. As stated above, only a draft "best effort proposal" has been released and further revisions to the map are not only possible but likely. Should Council wish to provide feedback regarding the proposal, and specifically the change to Tigard's candidate Urban Reserve area, several options are presented in Attachment 2. Listed below are key dates and events for the public comment period along with the timeframe for key decisions • leading to a final conclusion of the process. Please note that the public comment period ends on January 25, 2010. Washington County Staff has expressed interest in having elected officials attend the upcoming open houses and may invite them to participate in opening comments at the beginning of the events. Information about the open houses and other public involvement opportunities is being provided through press releases, direct emails to county partners (chambers, business, environmental, development and agricultural organizations), and 27,000 postcards mailed to addresses within the five -mile original study area. 1 • Regional Open Hoiises; and Metro Council Hearings During Public Comment Period: Mon. Jan. 11, Multnomah County East Building, 600 NE 8 Gresham 4:30 — 6:30 pm open house - 6:00 pm Metro Council hearing Thurs. Jan. 14, Metro Regional Center, 600 NE Grand, Portland 4:30 — 6:30• pin open house Sat. Jan. :16, Washington County Public Services Building,155 North First Avenue, Hillsboro 9 -11 am open house Tues. Jan. 19, Clackamas County Development Services Building, 150 Beavercreek Road, Oregon City 4:30 - 6:30 pm open house Wed. Jan. 20, Sherwood Library /City Hall, 22560 SW Pine Street, Sherwood 4:30 - 6:30 pm open house - 6:00 pm Metro Council hearing Thurs. Jan. 21, Wilsonville City Hall, 29799 SW Town Center Loop E, Wilsonville 4 :30 — 630 pm open house - 6:00 pm Metro Council hearing Timeline for Decision Making: January 25: Public Comment Period on the Draft Map and IGAs closes February 8: Final Core 4 Meeting February 10: MPAC recommendation to Council February 24: Metro Council hearing and adoption of IGAs Late February: Counties adopt IGAs March — May: Metro Council and Counties implement reserves through amendment of functional /framework /comprehensive plans OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A CITY COUNCIL GOALS Goal #1(d): Develop a 50 -year aspirational goal in support of Urban /Rural Reserves Program. ATTACHMENT. LIST Attachment 1: Urban and Rural Reserves Maps Attachment 2: Options 'Matrix FISCAL NOTES N/A I: \ LRPLN \Council Materials \2010 \1 -12 -10 AIS Reserves Update.doc 2 jZ.) V EI 12/03/09 Core 4 Proposed Areas of Preliminary Agreement and Areas for Further Discussion j ____ ;,. ATTACHMENT 1 • I t RR# �, 1 3 1 • . � f t UR iR ' : :.... I - -`.. , ar URy1 ' ti o m ( 1 } a ... UR DS < t .,.0 c.,. •w.ww UR -EE I lk w.yn ` •vnr,r nxawaazce ... , _ x I r M s W t .� -� 1 �N �. - n�.. .. L.._..., R te . •. J ... Ville ' I . I . . / / i ( ...... - weft - R -BB .., 9 t U 'FC j '''':nn,' r , iReBr �. r w OUR -% - MI UR9 - .� ,co U J ,. , 'UR -V . ,, , _:._ _ . . • r.na, k UR -U UR -N' • f 3 ` i - -/ L — mV i p Proposed Areas of Prelinunary Agreement — Urban County Recommended Rural Reserves Urban Centers x ,,+• Urban Areas � Co" Rero Urbmmeand Med Areas Suilabk S for Further Oirussion � ,' Urban Growth gourdaries • for boM r Rural Reserves - • .�., u Proposed Areas of Preliminary Agreement — Rural ra Urban and Rural Reserves Study Area Columbia River Gorge kelk Me. 1 nao'un,c ♦axo i riox a.arau Rural As foe Further Discussion Undeslgnated areas are shaded white Countytinea wmwu.. - _ a rzw+r o as a ^v 3 -Mge Reserves Study Area e ...xwo�px..w r ,--' • r --a 1 � /- 1. Core 4 �.._ Beaverton, Propos 441 I d Areas of Prelimi Agreement IT INN .,___ ,___........ ...._. , � o � bill " ` Decemb 3, 2009 i, , ._____„ 7 „)-- - , ,,....„--- ‘6 * -, __ ,,„ .=Ako-4f.-„_„=,_?._,fll a ,,,,„„.„,--,-,_„,-,:„,,-„.„,„ re � . IN% I _ ... ' . a ,r.if / ',-i—j• ____,___ ,....., - -,=. .„.. i, '--1 -c-----i " '.'-:i_---,:i.:i•f:,,._ --r:>.::::;:r- 40 allit '. ipp e . . . .. . . * a . . -_ NI a .4 , a . :::::!=,-:::Titn . Ir -.,.-,.. : . .. . . , zwa. _ _._. _ ,T,iii 4.___ j eV 0 1 �» , # G fly', J ,.,_ 'S4 o u r - i, .. -5:--o-F44,4x•ili - I - • 11 - ' I Ail p ,.,,,v47,7,;,,*:,11--:-F---g-iVrkk:-,-ii'iP.-.,:: • 1 - r _ _ . r . .....„.,),,,..„,-..:4„,-„,„,-,.„ r. , . „, w ,, , „ „Ti „ -„,,,,,„,,,-=,,,,,_.-„ : . r il Slitio ' . - ' ''-' . ' Tualatin j River National i '.,.. i n Proposed Tigard Urban Wildli ' K Cit Proposed Other Urban Reserve r . , ®Rural Reserve Refuge . Urban Growth Boundary �..._. Tigard Urban Services Area ., , OMB nfi; UGB Expansion 2002 -05 @ } ....,� T David Bragdon /Carl Hosticka 12/08/09 :Y.: ''''' . j • r Ae R � , • .. • I '� t •` gy • • bey a z ae ) • +aw- N . 'm wre.w, 4.14 111111, . wsvmny - n co. • 1 w. ,« »ate +� •i y r S ) � ` , t , -." a C i 'x-11 ., ' ',. ! . • Proposed Urban Reserve 0 Urban Centers wr.a N w • ip Proposed Rural Reserve County IMes - , 7 Proposed Undesignated Land (shaded white) ...s. 3-Mile Reserves Study Area • w Current Urban Growth Boundaries -. Urban and Rural Reserves Study Area ,.., Columba River Gorge Scenic Area e r s ... to V A tilik 12/16/09 - DRAFT Core 4 Urban and Rural Reserve Proposal for Public Comment . . • ...._ .......... _, i . . . , ,..... 0 3 . ., , ' ' '. r. • • 2 .............. _ . , ,. .. .. .. .• ........... . , . - . - _ • .• - . ... , ,.._ '.. . . - • - .., . - .. . . . ... , . • . .44i 1 -. . -- t-' • ' '''''. •• 4 ..... w... ...._.... .. .._ _ „ „•-• . . -.........,___ __ .._ • - ••----------..„ . - ...,... .••• - -._•,, ..,..., ! 4 • 1.4..-- • . • um. i x ; : •! , , .„.... , ..- . um , i It %.. .,i" „.. s • grim. . , xl . _ x ........ , . , .. sm.... ummuumum ; am -. ,, -,•• x' . . , , .., . , Um.1 • ......,, . x . .,.... ...MY ..... .„.. 0 ... , ., . . . .... . ..... -....„, . c...2% ' 7.,...,.... -! i , , • . . ,..., P k 91 ' . , . '.. . . ` ,... sm.... .. 411 .. i . - . ... ....-_,-.2 • i . ... Jp, A . , . , . 7 1 4, 77— . i 1 ._ L.. -'''' . - -:; ... . ..._ , - "V - --”-- • ” .. at i . ., _ L, 6 i ••••• " . ;,.:•atz :.:. _ j ..., i i.v.Ye.e:-.v.0. , 41 77 ,.... .•• 1 • .. .. . . • : ( •,,,......-...,, “' ■,,Z.!1',,VT - - -. 7. - .,., • ' ,,,,,,, .„ . '', • ,-.... .....a. .. i 7 * ii,.;) • -..., „, • dr Proposed Urban Reserve Are. 0 Urban Growth Boundaries Urban Centers ....,- Proposed Rural Reserve Areas ,s,.. ' Columbia River Gorge Scenic Area - .- County lines ;,., F ■ I , dip Additional Discussion Areas Urban and Roral Reserves Study Area ■ ., .17.1.7......90LACECIEVIDI i ...ere 607.1,./.81 P01711.410.0.40M9.32-273.5 ,■=■,... 0 Options Under Consideration UndesIgnated areas are shaded white a a. , 2 la VE-1103179,170 F..731.9 dego..* wavrngyn., z _ _"' %"�� t Core 4 � <B Y is Proposal for Public Comment C. ' T Av December 16, 2009 Fecry ®i� �.' ��: • ■ solo f , m ink 1 _ .0 Area 64 fi ce At , Removed �■ P' � � Ai / ■tse � h. ° Previous - ; i,iii/i// i �` I�— Proposal OF r will „ .. - . „ ilk. -, 416 ' , , ji ZA .... i. fab - 14 s p imr ,, t li , _ ,„ , ,, , . ,, : 4 SIIIPI Area 63 'I 1110/typik-,-, Tualatin Lk .j I River - ' 11111,0 , National Proposed Tigard Urban Reserve I C ng I -City 1 I ' L _-- P 9 Wildlife _ L I , L wt.u, Proposed Other Urban Reserve , _, R Reserve Refuge ■ Urban Growth Boundary . -1 -` S Tigard Urban Services Area �5� UGB Expansion 2002 -05 . i f ualat'i ATTACHMENT 2 Options Result Staff Comments • The City would not advocate for any This would require no further action. It would also reduce the No Action amount of land that the City would be expected to concept plan further modification of the map. and deliver services to in coming decades. This step would provide the greatest amount of future flexibility to Tigard and the Metro Region over the coming decades by not yet The City would request a modification of committing the land to future urbanization or exclusively rural land Req uest Modification of uses. Undesignated lands can be re- examined in future years, q the map to leave affected 350 acres although the process has yet to be determined, while Rural Map to Remove Rural undesignated (neither urban nor rural Reserves may not be redesignated for at least 40 to 50 years. Reserve Designation reserve). (See Attachment 1) Leaving the area in neither urban nor rural designations would, however, reduce long -term certainty for landowners who maywish to invest in urban development or food /timber production, a key goal of the reserves process. Focusing on lands adjacent to Scholls Ferry Road would. present Request Modification of The City would request a map the strongest case, as these are most suitable for urbanization. Map Resulting in modification to replace a portion of the Such an .action would allow for the "double- loading" of a Major Partial Reinstatement of 350 acres back into an urban reserve Arterial with urban land uses on two sides, while minimizing Candidate Urban Reserves designation. (See Attachment 1) impacts to natural resource corridors that exist further to the south. Request Modification of The City would request a map Pursuit of this option may require significant investment of time by Map resulting in modification to replace the full 350 acres staff and council. Such an action may be seen as running counter Full Reinstatement of removed from urban reserves. (See to a developing regional consensus around a tighter UGB and Candidate Urban Reserves Attachment 1) long -term certainty to agriculture and forestry. I: \LRPLN \Council Materials \2010 \1 -12 -09 Attach 2 Reserves Update.docx • Agenda Item # Meeting Date January 5, 2010 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title Review Draft Council Goals, Five -Year Goals, Long -Term Goals, and Council Tasks Prepared By: C. Whea - De skHead Approval'. City Mgr Approval: e / 7 A j r 0 ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Review the draft list of 2010 Council Goals, Five -Year Goals, Long -Term Goals and Council Tasks. STAFF RECOMMENDATION - Review the attached information to determine if it accurately reflects the City Council's consensus after its discussion on the 2010 Council Goals, Five -Year goals, Long -Term Goals, and Council Tasks. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City Council met on December 22, 2009, to set goals for 2010. The draft list of 2010 Council Goals, Five -Year • Goals, and Long -Term Goals will be submitted for final approval at the City Council meeting of January 12, 2010. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Revise the goal statements. CITY COUNCIL GOALS When approved, these goals will be published and staff will report progress on goals on a quarterly basis as well as making .a. note.in this section for future agenda items when the item relates to a stated City Council goal. ATTACHMENT LIST 2010 Council Goals, Five -Year Goals, Long -Term Goals, and Council Tasks FISCAL NOTES N/A I: \Citywide \Council Packets \Packet '10 \100105 \Draft Council Goals 2010 - AIS.doc DRAFT On December 22, 2009, the City Council met to set its goals for the comingyear. These goals represent those items that the Council feels deserve special attention in the months ahead. The City will accomplish much more than what is listed here, but we identify these to be of particular importance to our residents. 2010 Council Goals 1. Implement Comprehensive Plan a. Complete the Transportation System Plan (TSP) and begin area plans (Tigard Triangle, 99W Corridor, etc.) b. Update Tree Code c. Continue to promote plan for 99W Light Rail 2. Implement Downtown Urban Renewal a. Initiate developer outreach /recruitment b. Adopt Downtown Circulation Plan 3. Strategize with Park and Recreation Advisory Board on a 2010 Parks Bond a. Decide whether to return to ballot and, if so, when b. Develop land acquisition strategies (potential options to purchase, etc.) 4. Advance Methods of Communication a. Support strategic clarity /City values initiative (Do the right thing; Respect and care; Get it done) b. Develop communication tools to tell our story and support City goals 5. Support 2010 Washington County Cooperative Library System (WCCLS) and Public Safety Levies Five -Year Council Goals • Obtain Ash Street railroad crossing in downtown • Explore 99W Urban Renewal District • Continue to support the Legislature in addressing the financial needs of state and local governments in Oregon • Develop long -term financial strategy • Start implementing plan for City facility needs • Develop Sustainability Plan Long -Term Council Goals • Continue pursuing opportunities to reduce traffic congestion • Continue implementing Downtown Urban Renewal Plan • Continue to monitor the Tigard /Lake Oswego Water Partnership 2010 Tasks to be Accomplished: 1. Kim: Downtown Ads — List businesses by name 2. Downtown Parking & Circulation Plan and Downtown Code (tools to achieve common parking) 3. One -Way Street between Wendy's and NYNY — "fix" 4. U of 0 99W — Radically different alternatives so people react Alr 'NJ (Residential /Commercial /Blvd like Champs- Elysees) 5. How to use CPO4T? — Plan 6. Aquatic District Gap Funding 7. Council Workshop to Define Sustainability Goals I: \ADM \City Council \GOALS \2010 \Council Goals 2010.doc