Loading...
City Council Packet - 09/22/2009 Revised September 18, 2009. Added Agenda Item Nos. 9 and 10. ., ®.: City of Tigard II k Ti gar d Business Meet - Agenda Ittatiffft TIGARD ,CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD (LCRB) • MEETING DATE: September 22, 2009 MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard — Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign -up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign -in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503 -639 -4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503 -684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead - time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 5 - 639 -4171, ext 2410 (voice) or 503 - 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). CABLE VIEWERS: The.'regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. SEE A'I ACHED AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL /LCRB AGENDA — September 22, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 I 503 - 639 - 4171 I www.tigard- or.gov I Page 1 of4 RI City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD (LCRB) MEETING DATE /TIME: September 22, 2009/6:30 p.m. Study Session and 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION.: City of Tigard — Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 630 PM • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under ORS 192.660(2) (h) to discus pending litigation with legal counsel. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. • STUDY SESSION o Review and Discuss Topics for the 2009 Community Attitudes Survey Administration Department 730 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council, Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non - Agenda Items 2. PROCLAMATION • Family Day — A Day to Eat Dinner with Your Children — September 28, 2009 o Mayor Dirksen 3. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less, Please) • Chamber of. Commerce Report • Citizen Communication — Sign Up Sheet • Follow -up to Previous Citizen Communication TIGARD CITY COUNCIL /LCRB AGENDA — September 22, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 I 503 - 639 -4171 I www.tigard- or.gov Page 2 of 4. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council and Local Contract Review Board) These items are considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 4.1 Approve Council Minutes for August 11 and 18, 2009 4.2 Local Contract Review Board: a. Award Contract for Construction of the Hall Boulevard Crosswalk North of the Fanno Creek Bridge to Signal Construction Group b. Award Contract for Construction of the Fanno Creek Trail and Woodruff Bridge (from Hall Boulevard to Fanno Creek) to Civil Construction c. Award Contract for Construction of Hoodview Drive Sewer Reimbursement District No. 45 to Canby Excavating d. Award Contract for Construction of the Baylor Street /72n Avenue Sewer Reimbursement District No. 46 to GVS Contracting 5. TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE — UPDATE ON CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS • Administration Department 6. PRESENTATION OF METRO INTERTWINE PROGRAM FOR CONNECTING PARKS • Public Works Department — Introduction • Metro Council President David Bragdon — Presentation 7. PUBLIC HEARING — REVISED BUILDING FEE SCHEDULE a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges: Does any Council member wish to declare or discuss a conflict of interest or abstention. c. Staff Report: Community Development Department d. Public Testimony Proponents Opponents e. Staff Recommendation f. Council Questions g. Close Public Hearing h. Council C'onside'ration: Resolution No. 09- TIGARD CITY COUNCIL /LCRB AGENDA — September 22, 2009 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 I 503- 639 -4171 www.tigard- or.gov I Page 3 of4 + Recess City Council Meeting + Call to Order: Local Contract Review Board Meeting ❖ Roll Call 8. AWARD CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BURNHAM STREET AND ASH AVENUE • Public Works Department • Council Discussion • Council Consideration: Motion to Award Contract + Adjourn Local Contract Review Board Meeting + Reconvene City Council Meeting 9. SUPPORT PERIODIC REVIEW GRANT APPLICATIONS TO PERFORM AN ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS AND A WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN • Community Development Department • Council Consideration: Resolution No. 09- 10. SUPPORT AN APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FOR CONSTRUCTING SIDEWALK AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ALONG PORTIONS OF SW HALL AND KNOLL STREETS • Community Development Department • Council Consideration: Resolution No. 09- 11. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 12. NON - AGENDA ITEMS 13. ADJOURNMENT I:\ ADM \CATFIY \CCA \2009 \090922 business p REV.doc TIGARD CITY COUNCIL /LCRB AGENDA — September 22, 2009 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 I 503- 639 -4171 I www.tigard- or.gov I Page 4 of 5 ` ' ' C of Tigard rsi ' Study Session — Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD (LCRB) MEETING DATE, /TIME: September 22, 2009/6:30 p.m. Study Session and 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard — Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under ORS 192.660(2) (h) to discus pending litigation with legal counsel. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. • STUDY SESSION o Review and Discuss Topics for the 2009 Community Attitudes Survey • Administration Department o Review Public Testimony Guidelines for City Council Meetings (Attachment 1) o Discuss Consent Agenda Item Nos. 4.2a. and b. — Contract Awards for Hall Blvd. Crosswalk and Construction of the Fanno Creek Trail and Woodruff Bridge (Attachments 2 and 3) • Mayor Dirksen Administrative Items: o Added: Proposed Resolution for Martha Elizabeth Callan Bishop (Attachment 4) o Discuss: Lighting Standards — Burnham (ref: Council President Wilson mails) (Attachment 5) Council Calendar: September 29 Tuesday Special Strategic Planning Meeting — 6:30 pm, Fanno Creek House October 13 Tuesday Appreciation Dinner — Senator Burdick and Former Representative Galizio — 5:30 p.m. — Newport Seafood Grill followed by: Tigard Town Hall — 7 -9 p.m. — Town Hall Room 20 Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting — 6:30 pm, Town Hall 27 Tuesday Council Business Meeting — 6:30 pm, Red Rock Creek Conference Room; 7:30 pm, Town Hall TIGARD CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDA — September 22, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 I 503- 639 -4171 I www.tigard- or.gov I Page 1 Executive; Session . The Public Meetings Law authorizes governing bodies to meet in executive session in certain limited situations (ORS 192.660). An "executive session" is defined as "any meeting or part of a meeting of a governing body, which is closed to certain persons for deliberation on certain matters." Permissible Purposes for Executive Sessions: 192.660 (2) (a) - Employment of public officers, employees and agents, If the body has satisfied certain prerequisites. 192.660 (2) (b) - Discipline of public officers and employees (unless affected person requests to have an open hearing). 192.660 (2) (c) - To consider matters pertaining to medical staff of a public hospital. 192.660 (2) (d) Labor negotiations. (News media can be excluded in this instance.) • 192.660 (2) (e) - Real property transaction negotiations. 192.660 (2) (f) - Exempt public records - to consider records that are "exempt by law from public inspection." These records are specifically identified in the Oregon Revised Statutes. 192 -660 (2) (g) - Trade negotiations - involving matters of trade or commerce in which the governing body is competing with other governing bodies. 192.660 (2) (h) - Legal counsel - for consultation with counsel concerning legal rights and duties regarding current litigation or litigation likely to be filed. 192.660 (2) (i) - To review and evaluate, pursuant to standards, criteria, and policy directives adopted by the governing body, the employment - related performance of the chief executive officer, a public officer, employee or staff member unless the affected person requests an open hearing. The standards, criteria and policy directives to be used in evaluating chief executive officers shall be adopted by the governing body in - meetings open to the public in which there has been an opportunity for public comment. 192.660 (2) . (j) - Public investments - to carry on negotiations under ORS Chapter 293 with private persons or businesses regarding proposed acquisition, exchange or liquidation of public investments. 192.660 (2) (k)- Relates to health professional regulatory board. 192.660 (2) (1)- Relates to State Landscape Architect Board. 192.660 (2) (m)- Relates to the review and approval of programs relating to security. I:\ADM \CATHY\CCA SS - PINK SHEET\2009 \090922 pink.doc TIGARD CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDA — September 22, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 I 503 -639 -4171 I www.tigard- or.gov I Page 2 Mayor Dirkseri to review and discuss these guidelines with the City Council during the September 22, 2009 Study Agenda Item No. S'{" I,l f U 1 1)Yl Session. Meeting of 9 oc CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC TESTIMONY GUIDELINES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS Citizen Communications • Time Limit: 2 minutes or less* o Topics: Items not on the agenda. *Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Non -Public Hearing Agenda Items * If no sign -up sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. • If the Mayor allows comments, a time limit may be imposed. Public Hearing Agenda Items • Oral Testimony: o Time limit for applicant and /or applicant's representative(s): 20 minutes, total o Time limit (per person) for all other oral testimony: 5 minutes o Timer will be used for all public hearing testimony: • Green light will come on after the person has stated his /her name and address for the record. • Yellow will light come on when one minute remains. • Red light will come on when testimony time is up. o City Council and staff should hold questions until after delivery of testimony to avoid complications determining if the testifier has had the ability to comment the full 5 minutes. • Written Testimony: o For the initial hearing, testimony should be submitted as early as possible. The public is encouraged to deliver written testimony to the City Recorder 24 hours prior to the public hearing. o Deadlines for submitting written testimony can be imposed for continued hearings. o Scope of testimony limits can be imposed for continued public hearings. ® Public Notice on Hearing Procedures: o Hearing procedures will be described in the hearing notice, on the public agenda posted online and at City Hall. o A hearing procedures handout will be available at the entrance to the meeting room. o Hearing procedures are reviewed by the City Attorney at the beginning of quasi - judicial (land use) and legislative hearings. ® Rebuttal o Applicant will have an opportunity to rebut testimony at the hearing following oral public testimony from the proponents and opponents. Applicant shall respond only to testimony given and present no new information. The applicant will be encouraged to deliver rebuttal remarks in 10 minutes or less. I: \ADM \CATHY \COUNCIL \Public Testimony Guidelines - Prepared September 09 \Public Testimony Guidelines.docx \---4 ^ Agenda Item # ` - 6 i- Meeting Date September 22, 2009 LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title Award of Contract for ,Construction of the Hall Boulevard Crosswalk North of the Fanno Creek Bridge Prepared By: Dennis Koellermeier . Dept Head Approval: // City Mgr Approval ISSUE BEFORE THE LOCAL.CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD Shall. . the Local Contract Review Board, by Motion, approve a contract award for construction of the Hall Boulevard Crosswalk north of the Fanno Creek Bridge? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends' that the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve a contract award to Signal Construction Group in the amount of $91 for construction of the project. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Y A pedestrian crosswalk to provide safe crossing for Fanno Creek trail users is proposed to be installed on Hall Blvd north of the Fanno Creek Bridge. O The crosswalk will include flashing beacons, at and in advance of, the crosswalk; pavement marking, and permanent signing. The beacons, which operate on solar power, will flash for a predetermined amount of time when activated by 'a pushbutton on either side of the crosswalk. a Completion of the crosswalk will connect the existing Fanno Creek trail west of Hall Blvd to a new trail on the east side of the street, to be constructed concurrently with the crosswalk under a separate project. • Because Hall . Blvd is a state route, a permit has been obtained from ODOT for installation of the crosswalk. © The project was advertised for bids August 18, 2009 in the Daily Journal of Commerce and August 20, 2009 in the Times. A project addendum was issued to modify the size of an electrical conduit. Bids were publicly opened September 3, 2009 and the bid results are: EC Company Portland, OR $81,451.00 Signal Construction Group Woodburn, OR $91,903.00 Engineer's Estimate Range $89,000 to $98,000 ® Although EC Company submitted the lowest bid, it did not acknowledge Addendum No.1. EC Company's bid is therefore not responsive and does not meet the requirement for contract award. Staff recommends the contract be awarded to the next responsive and responsible bidder, Signal Construction Group. ® The construction is tentatively scheduled to begin in early October 2009 and to be completed by late February 2010. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None CITY COUNCIL GOALS This project meets goal No. 12, "Transportation," of the Comprehensive Plan, by providing a safe and secure route for pedestrians as specified by the Plan. ATTACHMENT LIST Project location map FISCAL NOTES Costs related to the project are as follows: - Construction: $91,903.00 - Deposit to ODOT: $10,000.00 (for illumination testing, signal inspections, technical assistance during the construction) - Traffic engineering: $8.700.00 Total project cost: $110,603.00 This project is funded in the amount of $98,000 through a combination of local funds and Washington County's MSTIP 3 Bike /Pedestrian Fund in FY 2009 -10. . - • . - . . • PROJECT LOCATION MAP • . . . I ! i , City Hall - i • . . . ,.. i ! . , - z C) . . - 0 i ! , ! ! 1 tl . • ' , i i . . , , , Pedestrian Flashing Beacon . ' ! i --- -- . - ' 4 , . ..-•• . . ______ ' • • •tii.....________„,.... .. _ _ • -- ---- - 7-•-\\. \ . - ---,-- . - -,-------=. ...- -- _ 1 Beaverton—Tualatin Hwy (Hall Blvd) • Proposed Crossing ,- . -=------ _ • • Hall Blvd. Bridge ' --- Ma "" .-, . / . — 1 V ----.\-- ,. - . ---.,_.- --- -- ___ __:L...; . . . - -------..-1.----- -- _ • . / ... .... ' ',. ; ' ! :. .., r; .... 1 . 7 i:: .. ..1. - + t : .: - Z ' ' i ::'..' .:! :; ' .7'.'7 I F ';'. ''.. -°/---7 A . . • \ • . / • , . .. .. ...... - 1- / --------- _____. • [ I / i •• I'. / PrOpbsed 8' Wide Sidewalk Library / . • - . . . . . . , i 0 ,/ It) :. •.: i .': i .: :. .• .• • • • . . . . 0 0 , ,/ / • • • ' . . . . . . . 0 • • - Proposed 4 4 , / / i ' / - - - -. - - - - - - --. . • . : . . • . • . " i . • . • • • • • : ..., ' I .. ...: •:. :.: :: "... :.. :... l ... ...: •... .1 1. ::. : • • .• :: :: .. .1 .. 1 " .. .. 1 ... Pedestrian Bridge o ---- - ' gg‘o ,--'". • . ' . • . • . , - MOSSO Proposed Elevated Boardwalk --'. • 4i • . • . • . Wetlands o 1 ,o 44,1iV \\‘" • . //'' ... V. . . . • • . • • • ' ' . . . , . . . . : . . . . • i • i • i ' : •. - . ' ) • . • . • . • . • . • .. il. .. ,. •,:. • • °. .. - . 1 . ' - ' . ' . ' . ' . ' - • . ' . . . . . . . ' " , . . . . . ' \ \ Wetlands I ,.../ . .. . • . ' I . • • , . - • • • I ..' . " • • - - - • • 1 . . ' .4 Agenda Item # L/ °�' 6 Meeting Date September 22, 2009 LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title Award of Contract for Construction of the Fanno Creek Trail and Woodruff Bridge (from Hall Blvd to Fanno Creek) fin/ Prepared By: Dennis •Koellermeier Dept Head Approval: I City Mgr Approval: ISSUE BEFORE THE LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD Shall the Local Contr Review Board, by motion, approve a contract award for construction of the Fanno Creek Trail and Woodruff Bridge? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends: that the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve a contract award to Civil Construction in• the amount of $139,130.00' for construction of the project, KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY . ® The new trail will begin on the east side of. Hall Blvd, then southward to just north of Fanno Creek. A timber pedestrian bridge will be installed in conjunction with the project to connect the new trail to the existing trail behind the Library. * A new crosswalk light will be installed under a separate contract at approximately the same time with this project to provide safe crossing for Fanno Creek trail users. • To minin»e potential negative impact to the wildlife habitat, the trail's alignment is confined to the southwest corner df the open field north of Fanno Creek and rather than a paved path, an elevated boardwalk will be installed .for the trail. ® The project was advertised for bids on August 18, 2009 in the Daily Journal of Commerce and on August 20, 2009 in the Times. Ten bids were opened on September 3, 2009 and the bid results are: Civil Construction The Danes, OR $139,130.00 CR Woods Trucking Newberg, OR $143,489.90 Parsons Excavating Portland, OR $145,215.50 GVS Contracting Newberg, OR $154,210.00 Somona Pacific Construction Happy Valley, OR $163,945.50* 2KG Contractors Milwaukee; OR $173,090.00 PCR Inc. Beavercreek, OR $179,350.00 Columbia- Cascade Construction Boring, OR $183,311.50 Brant Construction Vancouver, WA $189,390.00* Rutan Construction Hillsboro, OR $199,715.71 Engineer's Estimate Range $100,000 to $110,000 * Somona Pacific Construction's and Brant Construction's bids were disqualified due to their failure to sign and acknowledge Addendum No. 1. • The lowest bid submitted by Civil Construction is higher than the Engineer's estimate range but relatively close to the next two lowest bids. This indicates that the project was underestimated. • Staff has reviewed Civil Construction's bid and recommends the contract be awarded to this responsive and responsible bidder. • Upon Council approval of the contract and after the Notice to Proceed has been issued, the contractor will have 120 days to complete the project. The construction is tentatively scheduled to begin in early October 2009. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None CITY COUNCIL GOALS This project meets goal No. 8, "Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space," of the Comprehensive Plan, by creating a Citywide network of interconnected on- and -off road pedestrian and bicycle trails as specified by the Plan. ATTACHMENT LIST Project location map FISCAL NOTES Costs related to the project are described as follows: - Construction: $139,130.00 - Bridge engineering: $6,000.00 - Bridge material treatment: $3,000.00 Total project cost: $148,130.00 This project is funded in the amount of $110,000 through Washington County's MSTIP 3 Bike /Pedestrian Fund in FY 2009 -10 and local funds. The department will apply savings from other CIP projects to fund the balance. PROJECT LOCATION MAP City Hall i i t i 1 . , , i i .ci i 1:-. 1 I ; I 1 /:' , -k z =="-. Z „.... I I c.) a 0 i . 1 i i I o 4.. 1 I I i Pedestrian Flashing Beacon i _ I ......- • • ...,--- -- 7 --- __ -- ,77 - 77:.7 . .!:•-..1:1______Ti ci -_,. • ________ — .7.7... -----------_-..----,- --,,,•,- • , i... - ,7. --7- .L , 7.: ,— ------- j-i•---.1-.=-•----- • . _- • -- 'Hall Blvd Bridge \ Proposed Crossing - Beaverton-Tualatin Hwy (Hall-Blvd2 ______------- ...... Hall _ .A \ -t. X... \° • ______________ . _ _ _ _ • - I — .. _ ____I_____ ________ — _,-------- .---"'-''. ,------- '. ' . ' v... ' ' ' ' '''' ' - ' " - ). ''''....... 't `i •-=--------- — •.. 7 / / - ;,...!:: , ! - -::!.:: ; ...-s -7 .1r: ', ;'• .1 :' ----/– 1----- • „ • i . . I I 1 i ' I' -/ / Proposed 8' Wide Sidewalk . • • • Library / ." /' I ' . • . • .. / ).-)c . ' I I •/ / c.S.!" , I I /. i 1 . . . . . . , .• . . . . . . 0 . ,/ ,, , . /I /. : • : • : . . . . : .: . :. .: . l . • .: • :. • :. • : • .: 1 / 0 / ' • . ' . . • . . . . . . . . . Proposed 4. , i / i / Pedestrian Bridge \ . ---'-•--,,,,,,,..., \ ..--/ . . . . . . . . . . . . ' • 00\ \ . - ' • 0001000" ..-- • - Proposed Elevated Boardwalk .,--- . - - . ' . ' • A 40 0 \ . _ - - • Watlands • . • : .: . : . :. . ..:: . •...: .. . . . . ,,'" • • , ' , • . • . • . . . . . . . , • . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . • • . ' . . ' . ' . • . ' . • • . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 411P X': \ \ ' \\\" :IWO r ____:_. ...................... ..... .... ...... • _,_.........•.........,......... .... ............ i ......... . • • • • . • .... ........ / , \ ........ ..... ..... • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • ... ... . ..:.:.:.:.: , . . ,., .:. . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Attachment 4 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 09- A RESOLUTION TO. REFLECT UPON AND ACKNOWLEDGE THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF MARTHA ET.IZABETH CALLAN BISHOP TO THE CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY WHEREAS, on the 17 day of September 2009, death brought to a close the active life of Martha Elizabeth Callan Bishop; and WHEREAS, Martha Elizabeth Callan Bishop, through her enthusiasm and hundreds of hours of volunteer . service, earned the affection of the people in the City of Tigard community; and WHEREAS, on July 27, 1999, the City of Tigard honored Martha Bishop along with Ken Scheckla for their years of dedication to the community by naming the multi - purpose building at Cook Park the, Bishop-S checkla Multi - Purpose Shelter (Resolution No. 99 -57). WHEREAS, Martha Elizabeth Callan Bishop participated in the following City of Tigard committees, task forces and endeavors: • Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 3 • Central Citizen Involvement Team m Water Advisory Task Force • Park & Recreation Task. Force • Community Character and Quality of Life Vision Action Planning Committee • Downtown Task Force • Traffic Management Committee NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Mayor and City Council of the City of Tigard, do hereby recognize the numerous community contributions by Martha Elizabeth Callan Bishop and that her passing is a distinct loss to the City of Tigard. SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2009. Mayor - City of Tigard ATI ST: City Recorder - City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 09 - Page 1 T ---4 - 6( 1- 0 C, Ci K) e" S ---- City of Tigard tote . ;� Memorandum To: Mayor and City Council From: Dennis Koellermeier Re: Burnham Street Street Light Questions Date: Sept 22, 2009 The City Manager has forwarded me the e -mail string you have generated regarding installing light emitting diode (LED) street lighting fixtures as a part of the Burnham Street project. This memo is intended to explain your options as it relates to the project. LED street light technology is rapidly emerging and city staff have attended several briefings over the last few years. The technology is noted for its energy savings and pure color characteristics. Literature searches indicate several installations nation wide and more in the planning stages. Our current system of street light procurement has been to choose equipment from a list which is supported for maintenance by our franchised provider, Portland General Electric (PGE).Currently PGE does not support any LED street lighting products, but has installed a pilot demonstration in a subdivision in the Gresham area. PGE has scheduled a discussion with municipalities in November to further explore this area. The City could choose to alter its current plan of using PGE supported high pressure sodium fixtures, it would result in the City owning and being responsible for future maintenance of the units. This is a common model and referred to as "Schedule C in industry terms. The city would most likely enter into a maintenance agreement with an electrical contractor to accomplish this work. Process wise, staff recommends you award the. Burnham Street Construction contract as is, and in a separate discussion direct the City Manager to provide more detailed information on this matter. Staff will confirm where PGE is in the process and also determine what costs would be associated with such a change. If Council concurs this change can be implemented via the change order process. Cathy Wheatley _ From: Craig Prosser Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:21 PM To: Sydney Sherwood (external); Nick Wilson (external); Councilmail Councilmail; Gretchen Buehner (external) Cc: Dennis Koellermeier Subject: RE Lighting on Burnham Attachments: image001.jpg Our Study Session Agenda tonight is quite full, so we may not have time to discuss this at the Study Session. Dennis will be bringing in a memo of response to Councilor Wilson's questions /concerns. Bottom line, we can address many of these issues through the change order process, so we do not need to hold up contract approval. We need to be careful about the discussion at the Business Meeting so we don't give the contractor the impression that we are willing to pay whatever they want to charge for these change orders. From: Sydney Sherwood (external) Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 12:27 PM To Nick Wilson (external); Councilmail Councilmail Cc: Craig Prosser; Gretchen Buehner (external) Subject: Re: Lighting on Burnham Nick, I am in total agreement if we don't change the style. I think everyone would love to have some of the latest new technologies that will last longer and be better for energy savings. I am wondering if PGE endorses these kinds of lights and if the ones we picked weren't in the budget because they were PGE sponsored lights. Anyone know ?? Sydney In a message dated 9/22/2009 12:24:02 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, Nick @atlas - la.com writes: There are many manufacturers who make similar — even nearly identical fixtures. It would not necessarily need • to change the style. And I agree that since CCAC members were - adamant about the style decision, I don't think that we should re -open that. However, I would think that they would be receptive to new information about technical things that were perhaps not previously considered. Nick Wilson Atlas Landscape Architecture 320 SW 6th Avenue, Ste. 300 Portland, OR 97204 (503) 224-5238 1 http: / /www.atlas- la.com/ From: SYDNEYSHER @aol.com [mailto:SYDNEYSHER @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 11:35 AM To: gebuehner@yahoo.com; councilmail @tigard - or.gov; Nick Wilson Cc: CRAIG @tigard - or.gov Subject: Re: Lighting on Burnham I love the idea of using, LED lighting to show energy savings on Burnham. However, I am apprehensive about changing the style and all of that after our last mention about changing the lighting styles. The members working on all of this were adamant that we not get into style changes etc. I am more than willing to discuss this and even change my mind, however, the group working on this should be the driving force. If they are willing to take a second look, then let's go forward on this. Sydney In a message dated 9/22/2009 11:24:34 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, gebuehner @yahoo.com writes: I agree. Gretchen -- On Mon, 9/21/09, Nick Wilson <Nick@atlas- la.com> wrote: From: Nick Wilson <Nick @atlas - la.com> Subject: Lighting on Burnham To: "Councilman Councilman" <councilmail @tigard - or.gov> Cc: "Craig Prosser" <CRAIG @tigard - or.gov> Date: Monday, September 21, 2009, 2:12 PM Council Members, 2 1 . I had . a lighting vendor in my office last week and we discussed emerging LED (light emitting diode) technologies for street lighting. I took a look at the Burnham Street plans and noted that we are using high pressure sodium lamps (HPS). I also drove by Main 'Street at night and noted that the newly placed lights there are also HPS and that at least two of them are already not working. The energy chapter of our newly adopted Comp Plan says that we will investigate new technologies that can reduce municipal energy, consumption. Advancements in LED technology are now such that they can cut energy consumption nearly in half compared °to.HPS fixtures. The also have dimming capability that can be activated during certain hours (e.g. 2 am. to dawn) to reduce energy consumption further when the traffic is reduced. LED light sources last twice as long as HPS lamps. They would require virtually no service for 10 years. I'm not sure what we are paying PGE to do when we pay a flat rate. But it seems likely that it is profitable for them. Equally important, the color rendition of LED light is a natural white. The HPS lamps that are proposed emit a pinkish- amber light. In an area that we hope will have an active street life — including at night do we really want orange light from our street lights? Also the fixtures that we are using are not cut -off fixtures. They shine not only downward but also up and in all directions. We hope to have a downtown with dense housing. Do we want light shining upward into bedrooms? Finally our specs allow a half dozen vendors who make similar but not identical aluminum poles to qualify. Different vendors make castings of variable quality. Would it not be better to select a single manufacturer's fixture so that they would always be the same and of high quality. As it is, we will get the least expensive of the lot. Tomorrow night we are scheduled to approve the contract for construction for Burnham. As we move ahead with this project, this is perhaps our last chance to make minor changes. I am not suggesting holding up the contract but I think we should take one more look at this before the fixtures are ordered. The decisions we make now will be with us for a long time. I don't think this got the careful review that it should have. Nick Wilson Atlas Landscape Architecture 3 320 SW ,6th Avenue, Ste. 300 Portland OR 97204 (503) 224-5238 http://www.atlas-la.com/ I I 4 , . ,,, .• , -,, — '''' • ,''' 1•11.1'• . ',I-8', • '---...j' . ..-- '"'',-e4;a17,4,,t.,.;tiltifitl'S':".---•---• -,,,-!;'' -‘.'.'''T--. '-'.--,,, ::,:,77---‘447--:-'"'=7, a.-4:-.4"114`"*W44:-. ' ' --;',': ' -,irr- 7,--z:-..7,17:-z;',:13 --70; • — ..,, ;Vi,lt: `,4.4" : „ .,,, - ; „ - „, .,,,, ...". . •,;,,,,,---"'" ..?„. _,..A ' ■,,,,' 4■, e ,,, , ...3N ..v? ,,,,,4; - ' .;:c - v ,;,,,;.t. TA„--;-, --_,-::::: ".- ,,,,r. 2,,,f,ti.,%:,:.. , 1.p ' -.-,,, '-.`,.,.. ..- ','„ -. ' ...it • , ,- ,,..',-,.:- ----*,,,,,,,72.T;4„-A--%4Y-flef.-k4:, ,• Ato '21,144$.1,•...,,,-;,,,•4,1-1, ,-,, , , ..... 4 r„:1,,,, ,e.,.),:y:t%Lfirr''G''' --" . - ... „ .. . . . . , ....... - . .. , • • .• ! . „ .... . ) • crz, _ ' - ' - -', ,L„... „,„ ,...,,,:,•,,_ ••• ,: ,„_,., . , , : 4 • ,,Iii . •• --.C) , • , ,: -,,,,,c..,;,,,,,,,11•••:;:„:'i.„,:ii';',;..Y.!,',24,:',',:i: ,,,'-'..i.'-',:*47,5411ti'-g,i'll?n,,;';'-itiLiq'tik3't4,'",4047.!:',;.' - .V. : ' ,' ,.,'. '',' „. ! : '',:-.' 1.:',::',;;4'.4iiiiZi3-L-PY':if7;',",,,;.4,:;',",,,;'...'::,:.i.:::.,ii:.'.:b;-;;;;;L:-'-!';*Li..- =',. - . : ., ' ''''''', , .. •-, 3.,...t- .:L^ '‘ ,,--:'-t's tih,....'4',-,t;,,,?:,--',,!!',. ..,Lt..,t'''''...,-:, S'',-,,,1%.4,,':-4..2'2'..t.,.',1-,;,.--0',.q..,' 44 . '.,`,5,41.'1,,!-'1,.P",‘','45:444',.. - ' '_ = , - ,,'..9,t,g, i,k,-In.''^..-4,ALL'a- '.,-t-t-,:-`,Y,,,,LV,,,,,,,,,,,:v.!Cr,?,,1,4 .,"'t., .-,r.30,17'-': ...V,-...,.,''''ir,":",,, • . " , L ..... '..1-...;.,. ,,,,-,,,'0.;,::::!.-",'",,,,,,,,..-4.„.„.ft..., --00,-)14.,., - ',.t....,,L'4,!0,- : -''''',.-,,,,""---.;?..i.,1-13,',N.-..4.,-.1-1,i,,;e04,4',!';'. '..3,..t...,..,'",..-.'10 ..", ''''',&L'L'`.)1,", `Pir-taC.,,.' '''',.-°-,i4:;,. _ • -,'",.. ',.'''',":-,',4,!..-iiit',11,01?.....4,04,1trn,,,,-,:-;■?4!),..t.ligL.'4, .,-;',-Pl!'%,!(,,,,-,4XT„,e,4.,”:. if,',1",,,-,:x....'",:-Z.-!°:- -,!..' ,,‘,.-....2„..le.:,;,!:5....:41'4W.i.iih''',4,-,. .!'"',',?."-,!!L'.4,1:,...3',....ve..$.3t.7;3-N.',N%L. ' ''..' :'...::';'-''t4i:47C'E'!*3f-VKIL:''''.;,W,IT;a:' '''''LL;ff.,&,,,:tV''''''''::::::"';'.5'.A";743.V.;:PZel;Z:Alf' :-"..Y.'''%;'''''A'Litlla,'1,,,A4.4,1,..4),;;;;(1,,„iti,,..11.!,•A'..:41'.'S,,,!;Z''.4.1;7,401;,....;/Cp,,,ii",'',',i'd,:'.A.,,:;;%.:51ef'!O,"!:+4;;X■ri,fr,ft.i..,;..totZ3i1:•1:,:iirr?';;In-.-'e :47'.'‘'':' ' ti -----7. -'*"'"-e44:4:::z*Sti:^?:::i..-4.1V.-",',:',4vAtl.,4,-.. ...:--,..4:-,_,J;0;,•:-.1-;1,;:::,..,t2-;*,:!..,,,,Ni;.,:atiz,J,--4 , .. . ti4q4..AN,IFX).1.171e.., , ■ ,... . -..., ... , ,,,._,. - ..- % ,..-. ' , :4,.... . Al., , ,.%7:4,,.., ',7 4,11,'.., *...., ''',..i'..,.:,.., ,'''''....- ' ■ • . .. .. , . c' '4. , .. , . . . .... y X . , . , , ,c)ge. '-'''. '..5 -- I. -.'" ' - i'"' ...._ ..,.,::.......--,-;...,..;,.;.:00,3ceJr),:-:....,:wv,1-4-,,,-;,., 4 '..0 ,,.'',„,e"-T "-.'.",:,. ' .. --. .. ...", i '....1%.*„.4..;":11,,-" . . ,_-„,.-. ,-.L---'.•:! f.--------,::-:-.,... .--- - 4. . .. ,, .......,.--- - — - T ,... , -. - ' - '.-, , .., . ,-; .-,,,,,, . Q.) . ' <f),. - -:,.. ,.,.., .... ..,.,..,,,_-.,54...._%'41.1',1' ,..,...,.' , ' „ .i. , , , ri,..-. - „.---,-,--..7.-_-_--..e,--: -," — ...,..,...1 ze l' 1 , '" ,- ",' " ....,.,.....,,.—. -. ' - .. ',, _ ., .,,,,,,,,,•„,e_t:a,,,•4c .:,;,,:: - - t;:i : ,f„-,...--,,,- — .i.;;;;°.',: -:.t,.,..4.44:41,4*-,1i,„1„, -^,:. -, -.,.:•••„•,:zi,•-•,:z.,,,,,,,,h, • ' • . • '4'•-:-:•;51k4';';'1."'"'ll''''.;‘);*41141 '7,.4- • ',":04,..W,,c' ':"' - - '• ' ,-7-4.*64..--'..7.-7---•-•`-'•-_---....., `,-.---•-••,-•.-- - - ....,,,,,,..,.....11,11,-. ' , _.., . ,.,,_ ,,2.,, !,,,,:.i..1.•-, --,--,,t,,,,t:::..4.,:„ri-et'..a.:t,;;,ifi-f,„it2. - _„,„.„,,i; ,...,44;1•4--,tej,-.:„. „:"..i.. ,,,,,,i,4,:` ,4t,:•-•2.-•,,,,,-;,,e,N,,,i-,, -1.-",;;;;;:, -,15,;•.:17.',•••:• ' ' — . ' ' --7SS• . .' .::•,:t40414•Leti,,.:,1, ,,,,*•^::- ..i I, r„,i: :„... :___ :,,,........... _ 7... ,,,, .,, ., , - '8 ....,. - 1:1 -,..--::-.,:iitilt. 7E -----. „-„,-.-:.,L,„-1*.k;: .-J.t. 1'-f--:-.;,:lfi,:$734r4AANTZ.;.4''..?-:: .._,_ 1 . r t' • • . ,--. - : :lt,iil',ic:;i,tzr":ke,;-fi',L!', iirjj',o;:::-j#4rc..k.:74c4f.iiif.43Y...t;.:7...PT.7"..::.i.-...t.gr_.--.'f-f4i.;i;lk'----- .. :-:',...a;2:s.,:?.!;;:',T:;.,;a's'.:-lr:.i.'...:::':,''.:f,'";-;'.:' „,., ..-- L....--:--;,...--v,.;,::0144t.,,,..,...,.-4,',-..,,,.,-,. . _ ' -.,.........;:-.,,,.-:.&L-....: .3,..,:r .. , ,,-;),,,-...,,.. „..f .,...';'-.--.;-, ,,,. :--P --•.:7-,7".'vr--'n1.• 4k K., -tt-,i'v,,,i-V,-,tif„-,--'-',--,--i-f, f.' - .:,... „,tri, ,.t-."-,t,r.--.3/4— ' ,- ..'„%opr.;:4,1FV•t;a;••,4.'''';•,-;'t..,'-c;'''' :•''':--. - ''''''• .- -- - - ' LL;fte,,,,.,,,',' Ar,,,,,.....v„,,,v ea” ,,,,,.:,,, Is...,,,,,,ki...*:,,,-.-,.-„.r.f.-,,•,p '',.:7!„,g,?-z.:,-,„"-,, '',•:„,,...ti. '.23,T. ;'.- ?•';',-,1M-::t?„:7;4.-„vi, . '''," '',"`i..,5,,, it ' i ;-,-.7-•:----- -,•'',...0.,t.1714,,,„7- ....r.4,": f''°-: P714,41:::',.;"t".N;1,,,;-„Iii,',,,-..,--.24,,*?,,,,-...,-...:•,,..-..- ,,, ..: ,.......; . ' - q -17,-- 4,1k=-..-'-'7,•7474.'".,' -„%_-.' 4-t,.;.--,:t.,t ,...-4,.... 14,,,,,,,t! 174-7 *,-,.,...&.,,w-sA,,;,i.„0.;,- ..-:-'-‘,.,. I. i'''' ':.?:.?.:..;;;.f.,:a'4.:...-I-N-,,,',,,-; --r..4'.4, -.....1.7.:,:-.„4:.,!'.,-..-..i.t.i2, .*::.; ,4r,,,,,,,,,,_*.N,::::,-,-,,,,,,f0.,.,.. :. ,4,,,,, -4L,if•',...',';‘,.:';','"'. , -. -. ,!...7.74- ;'...."1}''.! '-' . (i) .U..1 'Si"4'4.',!,j1.;:k,•Nsf,•;,2*..'2-'.4 ..'4441;!"''.4,-.'''',. Vq,t, •k',2,),C,V4:* r,. --,.: i ,.,,,•., 7.!„,,44 •,.,,.. ich-,,,,,..,>, ,14 '',:"Ii7:1'i$'.'t:k'fi:"..'th ,, A.,V..,:-.'":40:44.0.4',4"„:.!,...;,'„ E E :.,,,- „...,4....-.- k.,0 = .- 4- a.) ,....1 ,,,- ... - -'%2 -. "74,:i. ,, ,p,,,;,,,,,:„ A E .,L, ._ x L) C • H .... ,...•.,• . ---,- •-• ,. -•,-.:.,...;•,.11`;-1!-1;;;;*,••••F-1,-F1,:r.1:4•1%:,---i'',:t.-'1-, ,*•:, - ,: l 7.: ' • ;-- ..0 . • ui no -c ra ,_ ra CD ,., ........,..,,,_...„,.. ... , . ........ c I 0_ - @ >'s 0 • 0_ Nitz 0 0 cu < . a . cu _ L.) = riMi = = if,- 4-ro -o cu , r3 cp na = = CD -1C3 ,,_ U co 41. , . , CI. 0 _....e. x Q- it..: SO ' CL E _ . .0 al ra < III cl, cs) •-• -5 z Q cr, H ..... cu c u . n3 C n3 . — • — (13 u ,,,_ dik , %.0 in ,•:', -( L9 . c — ._ cu ,L) < 0 7C3'4' = ‘-.1. Z . LL) 0 - 0 .....- 2 = o 0 ' • . • - ( \ .. • ..i (I) a >-. 4 id . J.' L.) j . Ira 1,... 7 1— • — . , . . :1- < • • „.,......, - - ... . j . .. .. . .....,, 18 -747 STERNBERG Vintage Lighting Acorn Fixtures A850SR LED OLD TOWN SERIES SPECIFICATIONS LUMINAIRE DESIGN Cast • The luminaire shall be a traditional acorn style fixture Aluminum s Finial provided with a decorative cast aluminum fitter, a poly- carbonate or acrylic clear textured acorn and a cast alu- minum roof. � Aluminum • The luminaire shall have LED light sources and roof . ` �. Roof mounted, down - lighting, optics. LED Roof - Mounted • The luminaire shall be 16" diameter and 40 over- Optics all height. Polycarbonate • The luminaire shall be UL or ETL listed in U.S. and or Acrylic Textured Lens Canada. POST FITTER Cast Aluminum • The fitter shall be heavy wall cast aluminum for high 508 Fitter tensile strength. • The fitter shall have an .inside diameter opening of 8 A850SRLED to attach to the 8" neck of the acorn globe. • When ordered with a Sternberg pole, the fitter shall be welded to the pole top or tenon to ensure safety and to ensure the luminaire will remain plumb and level over the luminaire life. DRIVER • The LED driver shall be securely mounted inside the fitter, for optimized performance and longevity. • The LED driver shall be supplied with a quick- disconnect electrical connector on the power supply, providing easy power connections and fixture installation. LIGHT SOURCES • The luminaire shall use high output, high brightness LEDs. • The LEDs shall be mounted in arrays, on printed circuit boards designed to maximize heat transfer to the heat sink surface. • The LEDs shall be attached to the printed circuit board with not less than 90% pure silver to insure optimal electrical and thermal conductivity. • The LEDs and printed circuit boards shall be protected from moisture and corrosion by a conformal coating of 1 to 3 mils. • The LEDs and printed circuit board construction shall be environmentally friendly and 1 %recyclable. They shall not contain lead, mercury or any other hazardous substances and shall be RoHS compliant. A NO. • g The LED life rating data shall be determined in accordance with IESNA LM- 80 -08. A850SR LED OLD TOWN SERIES 7 -09 (Continued on next page) 18 -748 STERNBERG Vintage Lighting Acorn Fixtures A850SR LED OLD TOWN SERIES SPECIFICATIONS LIST NO. OPTICS A850SR LED OLD TOWN • The luminaire shall be provided with individual, acrylic, refractor type optics applied SERIES to each LED. • The luminaire shall provide Type (III or V) light distribution per the IESNA classi- fications. Testing shall be done in accordance with IESNA LM- 79 -08. PERFORMANCE • The LED arrays are built in series- parallel circuits which maintain overall light output in the event of single. LED failures. • The LEDs and LED driver shall operate over a -40 °C ( -40 °F) to +50 °C (122 °F) ambi- ent air temperature range. • The High Performance white LEDs will have a life expectancy of approximately 70,000 hours with not less than 70% of original brightness (lumen maintenance), rated at 25 °C. • The High Brightness, High Output LED's shall be 4500K (3500K or 6000K option) color temperature with a minimum of 75 CR1. • The luminaire shall have a minimum (see table) initial delivered lumen rating when operated at steady state with an average ambient temperature of 25 °C (77 °F). Initial Fixture Initial Fixture Light Source Delivered Lumens Watts Light Source Delivered Lumens Watts 6ARC60T5 6520 96 6ARC60T3 6320 96 6ARC45T5 5420 96 6ARC45T3 5210 96 6ARC35T5 4840 96 6ARC35T3 4650 96 4ARC60T5 4410 66 4ARC60T3 4270 66 4ARC45T5 3680 66 4ARC45T3 3530 66 4ARC35T5 3300 66 4ARC35T3 3160 66 3ARC60T5 3460 51 3ARC60T3 3210 51 3ARC45T5 2910 51 3ARC45T3 2660 51 3ARC35T5 .2600 51 3ARC35T3 2380 51 2ARC60T5 2290 35 2ARC60T3 2110 35 2ARC45T5 1920 35 2ARC45T3 1750 35 2ARC35T5 1730 35 2ARC35T3 1560 35 ELECTRONIC DRIVERS • The driver shall be UL Listed or Recognized. The driver shall have overload as well as short circuit protection. • The driver shall pass the IEC6100 -4 -5 lightning test and isolate the LED's from power line transients. • The driver shall be a DC voltage output, current limiting design, 50 /60HZ. For 3ARC thru 6ARC LED Light Sources • The driver shall have a minimum efficiency of 90 %. The driver shall be rated at full load with THD <20% and a power factor of greater than 0.90. STERNBEILG 555 Lawrence Ave. Roselle, IL 60172 • 847 - 588 -3400 • Fax 847 - 588 -3440 Email: info sternber li htin .com LIGHTING vuww. sternberglighting.com @ 9 9 9 18-749 STERNBEIIG Vintage Lighting Acorn Fixtures A850SR LED OLD TOWN SERIES SPECIFICATIONS LIST NO. • The driver shall contain over -heat protection which reduces output to less than half A850SR LED OLD TOWN rating if the case temperature reaches 85 °C. SERIES • The driver shall have a universal 120 thru 277 AC input range. For 2ARC LED Light Sources • The driver shall have a minimum efficiency of 88%. • The driver shall have a universal 100 thru 264 AC input, range. ACORN • The acorn shall be 16 "diameter and 31 " tall with an 8 "diameter neck. • *The acorn LED assembly shall be retro -fitted to a (competitor) fitter which accepts the standard 8" diameter acorn neck. Consult Sternberg factory. • The acorn shall be made of (vandal resistant, clear textured poly - carbonate or dent resistant (DR) clear textured acrylic. For Acrylic add "A" to model number. • The acorn shall be supplied with a cast aluminum finial and a solid, cast aluminum roof which includes optimized heat sinks to provide maximum life and performance for the LED light sources. • The acorn shall be sealed to the cast aluminum roof to provide a moisture -free and bug -free optics chamber for the LED light sources. • *The acorn shall be provided with a perforated brass; decorative ring (PBDR) supplied in a (polished brass or painted) finish. The 2'/4" wide brass filigree shall allow light transfer through the decorative openings. • *The acorn shall be provided with a heavy cast decorative ring (CDR) which includes four (4) cast medallions finished in accent gold. The medallions can be customized with name, initials or logo. * (OPTION) ARMS • The arms shall be cast aluminum and /or extruded aluminum. • Arms with decorative filigree shall have meticulously detailed scroll work and gracefully curved brackets. • (All except BAPT and 779 arms) The arms shall be bolted to a post mount adaptor which is welded to the pole to ensure proper alignment. • (Twin TA and twin 579 arms) The arms shall be attached to a decorative center hub which will fit the center tenon of the pole (not shown). PHOTOCELL OPTIONS Bi -metal Button Cell Option • Photocells shall be thermo bi -metal button type. • On single post -top fixtures, the photocell shall be mounted in the fitter and pre -wired to the driver. E 555 Lawrence Ave. Roselle, IL 60172 • 847-588-3400 •Fax 847 588 -3440 EJl Email: info sternber li htin .com 7 -09 LIGHTING www. sternberglighting.com @ 9 9 9 STERNBEI%G Vintage Lighting Acorn Fixtures A850SR LED OLD TOWN SERIES SPECIFICATIONS LIST NO. On multiple head fixtures, photocells shall be mounted in the pole shaft, on an access plate. A850SR LED OLD TOWN The photocell is not pre -wired since drivers are mounted in the fitters and packaged separately. SERIES • The photocell shall turn on at 1.0 foot - candle and turn off at not more than 5 foot - candles. • The photocell is 120V or 208 -277 volt. Electronic Button Cell Option • Photocells shall be electronic button type. • On single post -top fixtures, the photocell shall be mounted in the fitter and pre -wired to the driver. • On multiple head fixtures, photocells shall be mounted in the pole shaft, on an access plate. The photocell is not pre - wired since drivers are mounted in the fitters and packaged separately. • The photocell is instant -on at 1.5 foot - candles and turns off 5 -10 seconds at 2 -3 foot - candles. • The photocell is 120V or 208 -277 volt. Roto -Lock Type Option (980 fitter only) • Photocells shall be roto -lock design. • They shall be thermal- bimetallic switch type. • Photocells shall be mounted in the housing on the photocell bracket and pre -wired to the driver. • On multi- fixture poles the photocell shall be mounted in the pole shaft on an access plate. The photocell is not pre -wired since drivers are mounted in the fitters and packaged separately. • Photocell time delay is 2 minutes to turn on at 1.5 foot - candles and 2 minutes to turn off at no more than 6 foot - candles. • The photocell is 120-277 volt. FINISH • Prior to coating, the luminaire shall be chemically cleaned and etched in a 5 -stage washing system which includes alkaline cleaning, rinsing, phosphoric etching, reverse - osmosis water rinsing, and non- chrome sealing to ensure corrosion resistance and excellent adhesion for the finish coat. • The finish coat shall be an electrostatically applied semi- gloss, super durable polyester powder coat, baked on at 400 °F, to provide a durable, color retentive finish. • *The optional (Verde Green or Swedish Iron) finish shall be hand- brushed using a 3 -step process. * (OPTION) WARRANTY • The luminaire shall be free from all defects in materials and workmanship for a period of five (5) years from the date of manufacture. • The luminaire manufacturer shall warrant the LED boards /system, during the stated warranty period, against failure defined as more than three (3) simultaneous non - operating LEDs. • The driver shall be warranted for five (5) years. TE JE G 555 Lawrence Ave. Roselle, IL 60172 • 847 - 588 -3400 • Fax 847 - 588 -3440 m Email: info sternber li htin .com 7 -09 LIGHTING www. sternberglighting.com @ 9 9 9 18 -751 TEIaiNBE Itp A850SR LED OLD TOWN ACORNS / FITTERS /ARMS PM - WB _ .+ �,�. c ^� i#"* �»as. �,�: � � � ° ,. y �. `r�s. +� a_ `n a �S �„ °� ACO RNS I . TO PS l `; ° � r , - � . ii. t OA % , , fit 16. w 16" W 16" W 17" W a1 11 k l A AM Aim 40Y2" 31 / 2 , 311/2 ,�u. I 31" 2" IP gi / V / 2 ' 1 1 o - -•; .:� 1 , lil� i �]iil iii�iillC� W' wr A850SRLED PBDR Option CDR Options Polycarbonate Perforated Brass CDR Gold Medallion A850ASRLED Decorative Ring CDR -CL Custom Logo Acrylic Cast Aluminum Deco. Rings i -, g a., X- 1 --.� x .or' _ ��^ FITTERS 4 . �� "- 4 ' l - t 3 � r 4 , , ti r'-*�, ,x -r -err 3:.�,��.. `�• 5 , '3; x:, Ev. ,.a.�.,t;� .# x.. .4 + ..� .;�d5 fl ..w ^.v w ��i � � �.:�C, - _ a- �a: .%�. ."�, °fin r� r .a�`�.,c'r`�' *ri,€^:�;'3� ,� c. �'�'., 10 " W 10 W 10 " W 10L8" W 10 Ire" W .9 3 14 " W 9 3 , " W I t ' .1.1111. §3l ® 1 S T T T T ) .. U . 10 �� 1008' 1O',4" 11 ?,4" 1� 13r,' / / /1�1AAA /) 4 r Cr r �1T) N N 'I Y z � X00 � �� ht u i y I,� I �fll �,,il4, ��,�u,�, 143,8' ._. _ 11111 D 0' 5P or 5T* BD4 BD5 B7 BD7 7 or 7T* 9 or 9T* (508) (508BD4) (508BD5) (508B7) (508BD7) (708) (980) Fits 3" poles Fits 4 " poles Fits 5 " poles Fits 7" poles Fits 7" poles Fits 4 " poles or Fits 3" poles or tenons and or tenons or tenons or tenons or tenons tenons - 3" with or tenons and arms below •Twist Lock Acorn (Fitter TL) adapter & large arms large arms '---€, , . ..,: it, A"1 , t . ,r.7- _". a .8:.41 , +, P , .. . L -r : s.,. ,, „gym nat,aya' #` . r T;$ " " € . ':ci iV yr ti -,V 1"e."a",' f V4, 1v " MS AR POS MOUN T T , ° (.PM for-WAL- BRACKETS{ tWB t =y .k. Seconfor �moreinformation ,7; 6 ' a1. "s a.r a E; fr... :4,4;4 ;', .. .. a. ,. ; a x s uo« , .•-x.. .<__r e",-,r.4 ,.. . A,, :".., : xt" s ° ,� ., ,, a�.4',. ..,r,,x -8 _ ..m:< n ^+ue# z w -V,s,. T:v", --. 11Pu " — �I - 1102 " —I , 16'/2 ""' -.0(-- 16 L2" 19 8 ,8" — ,,,_..„ _ iiiii. lk , 10, /e" 18' I 21 /e" �Tr 17' e O 1 � > 18" 80 50 ((� � � a /� I H 8 OD Dowwept Arm) �. 4 �� 1 i E -17 — » - 11 " /4" �� 478TS p TASCR 151: — 2„ Ir..: isi r ! 478 I� 31 b2 G V ve 9W6 154/4° ��' 71 +/a" . ���� ti� A nil 1., 480 Only TA I•I ` I _ 779 18 3,8"' ---�i 3'$ T L, 271n" —O.: . 450PB • 16 • • t 17 ' 18 '' li 0 0000cronnoa000a.. „,- 15 , � 15 /,' I , 10 r e 2 � '24" Ato r tr., 223," + A� Ali il ie ' r ' -1) i' I 7 -09 6236 55 55L �y/ BAPT V/ C 70 Twin Only • ' 18 -752 TEEL1'BERb Acorn Specifications ' ''i .s ura. . BUILDING A PART NUMBER POSTS, ARM FIXTURES CENTER ARM. MOUNTEDFIXTURE POST TOP FIXTURE POST POST CAP LIGHT SOURCE OPTIONS FINISH (PT) NO. OF-ARMS ACORN IFITTER / POSTARM ACORN (FITTER (See Post Section) .� a� arp -e - ` -. " 0 7 2 ASOSRL /50PM / 'A850SRLED/ PT/ 42 ; 11EP a / r / 6ARC4S y / _ , B K at i WALL FIXTURES A I PIER FIXTURES ACORNI FITTERI LIGHT SOURCE OPTIONS FINISH Uses same information WALL BRACKET boxes as wall fixture „-T + - ;a.sf xa:x - w�. 5 r} 3r ,F u; fr , vale nR 4a+'r'E-o-k%3�.d Aa50SRLED%5P/5 4ARC45T3 / a sera / g •BK „ A8505RLD%SP /4SOPB) Itl l nt"ATr x. 0 s / 1x.2/+7 7),,.. ,. ` " d.,, .,, *u _VAf ,r .. r c .,...` ., se ACORN / FITTER/ PIER BASE PART IV i647§%� � , , ' , air � r ;. � -, ..: . a'n , ox . ACORNS POST ARMS WALL LIGHT LIGHT FINISHES STANDARD FINISHES CUSTOM • A850SRLED' • 50PM BRACKET SOURCES T5 SOURCES T3 • BKT Black Textured • WHT White • A850ASRLED • 50DPM ARMS • 6ARC60T5 • 6ARC60T3 • BK Black Textured • 478PM 50WB 96W, 6000K 96W, 6000K • VG Verde Green • WH White FITTERS • 478TSPM • 50DWB Type V Optics Type V Optics • PGT Park Green • CV Copper Vein • 5P • 70PM* • 478WB • 6ARC45T5 • 6ARC45T3 Textured • WBK Weathered • 7 • 80PM • 478TSWB 96W, 4500K 96W, 4500K PG Park Green Black • 9 • 80DPM • 70WB* Type V Optics Type V Optics ABZT Architectural • WBR Weathered • BD4 • 480PM • 80WB • 6ARC35T5 • 6ARC35T3 Medium Brown • BD5 • 480DPM • 80DWB 96W, 3500K 96W, 3500K Bronze Textured • CD Cedar • BD7 • 55PM • 480WB Type V Optics Type V Optics ABZ Architectural • RT Rust • B7 • 55LPM • 480DWB • 4ARC60T5 • 4ARC60T3 Medium Bronze • 01 Old Iron • 6236PM • 55WB 66W, .6000K 66W, 6000K • SI Swedish Iron • TT Two Tone • 579PT • 55LWB Type V Optics Type V Optics • DBT Dark Bronze • CM Custom • TAPT • 6236WB • 4ARC45T5 • 4ARC45T3 Textured Match • TASCRPT • 579WB 66W, 4500K 66W, 4500K • DB Dark Bronze • BAPT • TAWB Type V Optics Type V Optics • OWGT Old World Gray • TASCRWB • 4ARC35T5 • 4ARC35T3 Textured PIER BASE • 39WB* 66W, 3500K 66W, 3500K OWG Old World Gray • • 450PB 'No fitter required Type V Optics Type V Optics • 3ARC60T5 • 3ARC6OT3 OPTIONS 51W, 6000K 51W, 6000K • CDR Cast Decorative Ring Type V Optics Type V Optics • CDR -CL Cast Decor Ring with Custom Logo • 3ARC45T5 • 3ARC45T3 • PBDR Perforated Brass Decoratice Ring 51W 4500K 51W 4500K Type V Optics Type V Optics • PEC1 Photocell - Bimetal 120 Volt • 3ARC35T5 3ARG35T3 • PEC2 Photocell -Bimetal 208 -277 Volt 51W, 3500K 51W, 3500K • PEC1 -E Photocell- Electronic 120 Volt NOTES: Type V Optics Type V Optics • PEC2 -E Photocell- Electronic 208 -277 Volt +White polycarbonate acorns are available. • R Receptacle Only for Rotolock Photo Cell SpecifyWR after acornhunter: • 2ARC60T5 • 2ARC60T3 • R1 Rotolock Photo Cell 120 -277 Volt 2 Consult factory for Specifcaflon Details 35W 6000K 35W, 6000K • FHD Dual Fuse & Holder 3Standard is - polished. If' painted specify Type V Optics Type V Optics PF per arm Pineapple Finial or Font 4 ' FoD9 or.ftter.only. • • 2ARC45T5 • 2ARC45T3 (for TA, TASCR) pp 5 Not available om3ARC sources. 35W, 4500K 35W, 4500K • BF per arm Ball Finial or Font (for TA, TASCR) Type V Optics Type V Optics • G GFI • 2ARC35T5 • 2ARC35T3 • HL Hi - Low Operation 35W, 3500K 35W, 3500K Type V Optics Type V Optics STER.NBEA 555 Lawrence Ave. Roselle, IL 60172.847- 588 -3400 • Fax 847- 588 -3440 li - hti m Email: info sternber li htin .com 7 -09 LIGHTING' www. sternberg g ng.co @ 9 9 9 Cast Aluminum Posts NORTH YORKSHIRE Series tapered fluted shafts 20" dia. base 14' -5" 12' -11" 10' -11" 8' -11" w fir NY14C /20- CA/ finish NY13C /20- CA/ finish NY11C120- CA/finish NY9C120- CAI finish DIMENSIONS The post shall be X- XX" in height with a 20" diameter base. The SPECIFICATIONS shaft diameter shall taper from 3.5" at the top to 5.5" above the base. An integral 3" 0.D.,tenon shall be provided at the top for luminaire mounting. The post top shall include a transitional donut between the fluted shaft and the tenon. DESCRIPTION The post shall be all cast aluminum construction with a classic tapered and fluted base,and a gracefully tapered 12-flute cast shaft. The post shall be Holophanes' INSTALLATION The post shall be provided with four, hot dip galvanized L -type catalog number NYXXC /20- CA/finish. anchor bolts to be installed on a 15" bolt circle. A door shall be provided in the base for anchorage and wiring access. A grounding screw shall be provided inside the MATERIALS The post shall be heavy wall, cast aluminum produced from certified ASTM base opposite the door. 356.1 ingot per ASTM B179-95a or ASTM B26 -95. The castings shall be formed true to the pattern with complete detail. All hardware shall be tamper resistant; stainless steel. Anchor For finish specifications and color options, see " Finish" section in catalog. bolts to be completely hot dip galvanized. CONSTRUCTION The cast shaft shall be circumferentially welded to the base casting and • shipped as one piece for maximum structural integrity. All exposed welds below 8' shall be •4 4 ground smooth. All welding shall be per ANSI /AWS D1,2 -90. All welders shall be certified per Section 5 of'ANSI /AWS D1.2 -90. opii , ®An Vic uityBra ndsCompany LEADER IN LIGHTING SOLUTIONS 214 OAKWOOD AVENUE - NEWARK, OHIO 43055 US -1643 Rev. 4 -7 -05 Page 1 of 2 NORTH YORKSHIRE Series ORDERING GUIDE Cast Aluminum Posts sample catalog number NY13C /20 - CA/BK - Post - material / finish - options 3" O.D. x 3" NORTH YORKSHIRE Cast Aluminum 12-11" Height Black High Tenon Cast shaf 20" dia. base Post (check appropriate boxes, add height in blank) Catalog # Heights ❑ NY9C /20 8' - 11" � ' ❑ NY11C /20 1(Y — _ 0 3.5" ❑ NY13C /20 12' -11" ❑ NY14C /20 14' - 5" Material /Finish Catalog Suffix Description ❑ - CA/BK Cast Aluminum /Black (std.) ❑ - CA/DG Cast Aluminum /Dark Green ------ ❑ - CA/DB Cast Aluminum /Dark Bronze ❑ - CA/PP Cast Aluminum /Prime Painted ❑ - CA/CC Cast Aluminum /Custom Color , 1111 (for complete finish and color options, Ar see " Finish' section in catalog) 9C 20 ' " Optional,Equipment NY11C NY /20 : 10' 1111" Cat slog'Suffx Description see N Y13C /20 : 12' -11" ❑ - Receptacles (see Accessories section) NY14C /20 / ; 14 -5" ❑ - Banner ms ( Accessories section) ❑ - Flag Pole Holders (see Accessories section) ❑ - Cog ( Acerietion) ❑ - Signage ustm (see os Signage section (for optional equipment not found in catalog , consult see c factory) s sec ANCHORAGE GUIDE 0 5.5" 3.5 "x8.5 "x8.5" H. t•W� —q Door Opening for I , _�. ir 1 Anchorage and if Il 4b Wiring Access MMIMIM \\ 10.6" _ _ , ��____ _ ii j i i Opening :- _ i _ ;_ GMEIMMEM 15" Dia. Bolt Circle • 1 0 20" 3 „ . o% e Ro 0 3/4" 44.• •• Hot Dip Galvanized e,4L L -type Anchor Bolts HO`opiiANi ®An qigcuityBrandsCompany (4 per Post) LEADER IN LIGHTING SOLUTIONS 214. OAKWOOD- AVENUE - NEWARK, OHIO 43055 US -1643 Rev. 4 -7 -05 Page 2 of 2 Cast Aluminum Posts WADSWORTH Series extruded shafts 17° dia. base Q2 El • ).:14 lllt� ),I ,t, l/l, l l ;� Milli Mwwum AMMIbm I«wwIPm Maurm MUMMY) ISavMn>> W12S4 /17- CA/finish W12S5 /17- CA/finish W12F4/17- CA/finish WI2F5/17- CA/finish W12T4 /17- CA/finish W12T5 /17- CA/finish 4" dia. smooth shaft 5" dia. smooth shaft 4" dia. fluted shaft 5" dia. fluted shaft 3 " -4' dia. tapered shaft 3 " -5" dia. tapered shaft 8', 10', 12, 14' 10', 12', 14%16' 8',10', 12', 14' 10', 12', 14%16' 8', 10', 12', 14' 10', 12', 14', 16' SPECIFICATIONS DIMENSIONS The post shall be X' -XX" in height with a 17" diameter base. The shaft diameter shall. be XX ". (see back page) At the top of the post, an integral DESCRIPTION The lighting post shall be all aluminum, one -piece construction, with a classic 3" O.D. tenon with a transitional donut shall be provided for luminaire mounting. double- tapered and fluted base design. The shaft shall be _ . (insert shaft options INSTALLATION The post shall be provided with four, hot dip galvanized L -type anchor from back page) The post shall be Holophane catalog number WXXXX/17- CA/finish. bolts to be installed on a slotted 12" diameter bolt circle. A door shall be provided inside the base for anchorage and wiring access. A grounding screw shall be provided MATERIALS The baseeshallbe heavy wall, cast aluminum produced from certified ASTM inside the base opposite door. 356.1 ingot per ASTM B- 179 -95a or ASTM 026-95. The straight shafts shall be extruded from For finish specifications and color options, see " Finish" section in catalog. aluminum, ASTM 6061 alloy, heat treated to a T6 temper. The tapered shaft shall be extruded from aluminum, ASTM 6063 alloy, spun to a tapered shape, then heat treated to a T6 temper. All hardware shall be tamper resistant- stainless steel. Anchor bolts to be completely hot dip galvanized. • ' CONSTRUCTION The shaft shall be double welded to the base casting and shipped as one �44•�* piece for maximum structural integrity. The shaft shall be circumferentially welded inside the base casting at the top of the access:door, and externally where the shaft exits the base. All OPN�® cliIcuity8randsCompany exposed welds below 8' shall be ground smooth. All welding shall be per ANSI /AWS D1.2 -90. LEADER IN LIGHTING SOLUTIONS 214 OAKWOOD AVENUE - NEWARK, OHIO 43055 All welders shall be certified per Section -5 of ANSI /AWS D1.2 -90. US - 1639 Rev. 4 - - Page 1 of 2 WADSWORTH Series Ordering Guid.e sample catalog number Cast Aluminum Posts W12S4/17 — CA/BK — Post - material /finish - options WADSWORTH Cast Aluminum Smooth 4" shaft Black 1 SHAFT ! "- 7" dia. base Post (check appropriate boxes) • / Catalog '# Shaft type Heights OPTIONS - - -� ❑ W 54117 4" dia. smooth 8', 10', 12', 14' ❑ W S5/17 5" dia. smooth 10', 12', 14', 16' 4" Dia. Smooth 5" Dia. Smooth ❑ W 4" dia. fluted 8', 10', 12', 14' ❑ W /17 5" dia. fluted 10', 12', 14', 16' ❑ W_T4/17 3"-4" dia. tapered 8', 10', 12', 14' /,�.. ❑ W 4 " -5" dia. tapered 10', 12', 14', 16' f i .) + / Material/Finish _...._ , / ; / ' . ••mo t Catalog Suffix Suffix Description •i + ../ •� ❑ -CA/BK Cast Aluminum /Black (std.) ❑ -CA/DG Cast Aluminum /Dark Green 4" Dia. 5" Dia. 3 "-4" Dia. 3 " -5" Dia. ❑ -CA/DB Cast Aluminum /Dark Bronze Tapered Tapered ❑ -CA/PP Cast Aluminum /Prime Painted Fluted Fluted P p ❑ -CA/CC Cast Aluminum /Custom Color (for complete finish and color options, see " Finish" section in catalog) Optional Equipment Catalog Suffix Description 3" O.D. x 3" ❑ - Receptacles (see Accessories section) ❑ - Banner Arms (see Accessories section) High Tenon ❑ - Flag Pole Holders (see Accessories section) _ri ❑ - Custom Logos (see Accessories section) ❑ - Signage (see Signage section) (for optional equipment not found in catalog, consult factory) ANCHORAGE GUIDE 8.5" /'� / '% Door Post 10" Dia. S 3 Opening 3" x 5" x 4.5"H Height Opening / Door Opening for (_____-) / Anchorage and �, / � Wiring Access ` - 0 12" Bolt -- Circle III �-- _____ „ ' taullgo, 17" ,ms' I--- 0 17" m 3/4" Hot Dip Galvanized L -type Anchor Bolts (4 per Post) �`�HA�r�A �Ic LEADER. IN LIGHTING SOLUTIONS 2I4 OAKWOOD AVENUE - NEWARK, OHIO 43055 US -1639 Rev. 4 -7 -05 Page 2 of 2 Washington. Acrylic Optics Maximum Weight- 43 lbs C M •EPA - 2.27 sq. ft. 0 017 1/4" - ACRYLIC • TOP COVER REFLECTOR AIM �,L © CD eni /I (NON- REMOVABLE VERSION ONLY) ■ eo as 0 PRISMATIC 0 ACRYLIC °. — REFLECTOR PRISMATIC ACRYLIC REFRACTOR W 42 1/2" > f NOMINAL HEIGHT O OPTIC <N O LUMINAIRE SET SCREW HOUSING -r Q i 1pll ll 1 1, 0 I- '� i t `, ' 0 O SET SCREWS '. .. l,l l'. ! 'IIIII v J 2 WI F G "J E? SLIPFITTER FOR `'' U `.- NOMINAL 3" DIA. � ■ j c TENON � � � P m A . z rI z S J 3a p,, -K N i rH AWE 116 AS B 1 N F G m ��w =�� N0a, ‹o— Z I - = ° .o$o $o$ O HOUSING o <r Q AWE= SSTANDARD lmo 1 I a$ --6- IX - SOURCE & WATTAGE VOLTAGE HOUSING COLOR OPTICS FINIAL o a, O BALLAST'(LED DRIVER) AS = AUTO: SENSING A = AS SPECIFIED 1 = ASYMMETRIC B = BALL < $ m m LL V ' 116 = 1.16 W (700mA) VOLTAGE B = BLACK 2 = SYMMETRIC C = CLEAR w T. <w F i o w Z 058 = 58 W (350mA) (12 V) D =DARK GREEN E =EAGLE 0. TIGER DRYLAC RAL6005 F = FLOWER ?oo o=Eo3ii Z E = BROWN GREEN K =KNUR KNOB 3�.zo� R. W TIGER DRYLAC RAL6008 N= NONE z o m z a F 7 = F =DARK GREEN P - PAWN R =CROSS <�oo, z o 3 z ° �� °"o - z 6 BC Ci TIGER DRYLAC RAL6009 - F a F y p S = STANDARD c H =DARK GREEN .°mom3mn°oQo 0 TIGER DRYLAC RAL6012 N = GREEN Z = BRONZE TRIM COLOR TRIM A = AS SPECIFIED B = BLACK OPTIONS D = FULL COVER WITH MATCHING D = DARK GREEN H = NEMA'TWISTLOCK PHOTOCONTROL.RECEPTACLE (Photocell Not. Included. 120 -277V) `RIBS &MEDALLIONS TIGER DRYLAC RAL6005 TB = CLEAR ACRYLIC REFRACTOR AND PAINTED BLACK REFLECTOR F = FULL SPUN COVER E = BROWN GREEN P27.= DTL TWISTLOCK PHOTOCONTROL 120 -277 M = MEDALLIONS AND BAND ONLY TIGER ORYLAC RAL6008 (DTL Tiwstlock Photocontrol 120 -277 Volt Not Available With Shorting Cap. Must Be Used With "H" Option) N.= NO TRIM F =DARK GREEN LU PSC = SHORTING DAP (Shorting Cap Not Available. With Photocontrol. Must Be Used With "H° Option) TIGER ORYLAC RAL6009 O LIH 1.5 FT PREWIRED LEADS G = GOLD C T ' L03= 3 FT PREWIRED. LEADS H = DARK GREEN = N L10 = 10 FT PREWIRED LEADS C.) t TIGER DRYLAC RAL6012 L20 = 20 FT PREWIRED LEADS — 3 CO D L25 = 25 FT PREWIRED LEADS N = GREEN # U = NO TRIM AND CLEAR OR L30 = 30FT-PREWIRED LEADS NO FINIAL CC Z Z = BRONZE IL di W Ur oa < (— ACCESSORIES Ct } A RIBS, BAND & MEDALLION KIT WHERE X= FINISH FROM STEP 8. 1 of2 A 4, ,.4.k.. FINIALS A C 0 via BALL Ci) C3 A A ' ..,.., ! 111-11 ,.,,„. Jil . If . CLEAR 5 /� �q m ^k a �'p V V / EAGLE YO �. ��� • : F n r� • I's•t�1C$3 C�7t�lrf'1 , a, w._ a fi e � d, A it% CI. 1i 1 1 1 FLOWER LLJ 1 , 1 1 L Lt ( 1 �fI I� Il I l � ) PAWN ¢ o \ 111111 t 12L 0 111 _'•• ) I U 1 111 II II CROSS U I I \ P I INI W 0 A (21 r, ACRYLIC WASHINGTON OPTICS ACRYLIC WASHINGTON. OPTICS STANDARD o ,, BAND, RIB AND MEDALLIONS (AWERBMX) FULL ALUMINUM.COVER i7 4 STANDARD FINIAL STANDARD FINIAL ® o U a .: i=`Q KNURLED CAP '•:� = m to Z u m GENERAL DESCRIPTION t� IF The Acrylic Washington LED is designed for years of maintenance free operations. The traditional acorn shaped luminaire, while ° ¢ 1 reminiscent of the 1920's contains a precision optical system that maximizes post spacings while maintaining uniform illumination. C OPTICAL SYSTEM � w The optical system consists of a precisely molded thermal acrylic plastic refractor and top reflector mounted within decorative aluminum w o > � 3 w "w ribs and banding. The top reflector redirects of 50% of the upward light into the controlling refractor while allowing a soft uplight Fs 2 § 1 a�1 component to define the traditional acorn shape of the luminaire. The lower refractor uses precisely molded prisms to maximize pole W N� � f = < °� pi spacings while maintaining uniform illuminance. Two distributions are available, designed for asymmetric and symmetric patterns. There 1,Na 2 5 3w °o9 °o are 12 high output LEDs mounted to the to ca of the housing and are covered by a tertiary optical device, which directs the light to the w E g `� w oi' `> 9 P top cap 9 Y rY P 9 96 °F� „4g metalized reflector mentioned below. HOUSING w xajz¢ ° s ` oa0m aLL The luminaire finned housing, cast of aluminum, provides an enclosure for the electronic driver and is designed to thermally manage the iwmww ° LED array provided. A metalized reflector is attached to provide direction for the main beam. Four uniquely designed stainless steel A slipfitter will accept a 3” high by 2-7/8" w: o spring clip enclosed in a polyvinyl chloride sleeve and adjusted by a hex head Y. -20 bolts securely cradle the prismatic glass refractor. 3° ° ° °; -p3 '4 The same-20 bolts support the decorative rib and band assembly. " " to 3 -1 /8 O.D. pole tenon. a 3-1/8" ° o w o � a ° m! w o 6 9 L ow ° HOUSING DOOR ! - w a f l >i °oog Cast of aluminum, the housing door is removable by one captive screw and is retained by a nonconductive lanyard. For units with an EEI -NEMA twist -off photocell receptacle, the door contains a glass "window" to allow light to reach the cell. LED DRIVER (Refer to Ballast Data Sheet for specific operating characteristics) 50 or 60 Hz voltage sensing 120 -277V > 90% efficient electronic. Potted for increased thermal management. Removable through access door. FINISH w CO The luminaire is finished with, polyester powder paint applied after a pretreatment process to ensure maximum durability. The finish shall i � p Q pass the 1000 hour salt fog test per ASTM standard B117. C.) N g — ) co D ii UL LISTING J The luminaire is designed to U.L. standards as suitable for wet locations up to 40 ° C ambient temperature, depending on wattage. w Z w Q di O } cC IP RATING O 1-000 The luminaire housing and optical chamber is rated IP -65. 2 S4 Agenda Item #2�0- U� Meeting Date 9/22/09 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title Review and discuss topics areas for 2009 Community Attitudes Survey Prepared By: Liz Newton /Kent Wyatt Dept Head Approval: City Mgr Approval: ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Which of the proposed topics does Council wish to have considered for use in the 2009 Community Attitudes Survey? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Provide consultation on survey question topics. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY City Council requested that staff commission a survey every two years to help City officials and staff better understand residents perception of the quality of life in the City as well as attitudes toward key issues facing the City. Staff has developed a list of potential topics to add to this year's survey. Attached is a listing of potential survey topics and a project timeline. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N /A. CITY COUNCIL GOALS N /A. ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment A: Community Attitudes Survey Summary. FISCAL NOTES The project was budgeted for $30,000. • Attachment A • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY ATTITUDES SURVEY CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OBJECTIVE The 2009 Community Attitudes Survey was commissioned to help City officials and staff better understand residents' perception of the quality of life in the City as well as attitudes toward key issues facing the City. The City intends to conduct a survey every two years to track changes and trends in resident attitudes. 2007 SURVEY DETAILS Campbell Delong Resources, Inc conducted a telephone survey with a random sample of 400 residents of Tigard. Survey results were compared with similar surveys in Lake Oswego, Gresham, and Washington County. Traffic, public safety, growth, parks and taxes were listed by respondents as the most important issues the City Council needs to address. 2009 PROJECT STATUS Three consultants submitted quotes to work on the survey. Staff is in the process of reviewing quotes and will select a consultant in mid- September. Staff will work with the selected consultant firm to recommend questions which will be included in the actual survey. The City expects the selected consultant firm to provide expertise on the topics of interest and an appropriate length for the survey. POTENTIAL NEW TOPICS FOR 2009 SURVEY Staff reviewed the 2007 Community Attitudes Survey and determined most of the survey questions need to be retained to maintain a baseline. There is space available to replace two or three questions on key issues. General topics being considered for use in this year's survey are: o Alternative methods of transportation o Highway 99 congestion /access management o Strategic clarity initiative (how to measure — "A Place to Call Home ") o Improvements to City facilities o Prioritization of long -term capital projects o Urban renewal /Downtown improvements o Economic development PROJECT TIMELINE Week of September 21 Initial meeting with consultant to discuss survey details September 23 .to. September 30 Staff and consultant finalize survey instrument October 1 to October 30 Consultant conducts and completes survey November 24 Consultant presents survey findings to City Council Mayor Dirksen to review and discuss these guidelines with ( the City Council during the September 22, 2009 Study Agenda Item No. S+U f� U r' ',111Y1 Session. Meeting of 9, )Q CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC TESTIMONY GUIDELINES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS Citizen Communications • Time-Limit: 2 minutes or less* • Topics: Items not on the agenda. *Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Non - Public Hearing Agenda Items • If no sign -up sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. • If the Mayor allows comments, a time limit may be imposed. Public Hearing Agenda Items a Oral Testimony: o Time limit for applicant and /or applicant's representative(s): 20 minutes, total o Time limit (per person) for all other oral testimony: 5 minutes o Timer will be used for all public hearing testimony: • Green light will come on after the person has stated his /her name and address for the record. • Yellow will light come on when one minute remains. • Red light will come on when testimony time is up. o City Council and staff should hold questions until after delivery of testimony to avoid complications determining if the testifier has had the ability to comment the full 5 minutes. • Written Testimony: o For the initial hearing, testimony should be submitted as early as possible. The public is encouraged to deliver written testimony to the City Recorder 24 hours prior to the public hearing. o Deadlines for submitting written testimony can be imposed for continued hearings. o Scope of testimony limits can be imposed for continued public hearings. • Public Notice on Hearing Procedures: o Hearing procedures will be described in the hearing notice, on the public agenda posted online and at City Hall. o A hearing procedures handout will be available at the entrance to the meeting room. o Hearing procedures are reviewed by the City Attorney at the beginning of quasi - judicial (land use) and legislative hearings. • Rebuttal o Applicant will have an opportunity to rebut testimony at the hearing following oral public testimony from the proponents and opponents. Applicant shall respond only to testimony given and present no new information. The applicant will be encouraged to deliver rebuttal remarks in 10 minutes or less. I:A ADM \ CATHY \COUNCIL \Public Testimony Guidelines - Prepared September 09 \Public Testimony Guidelines.doex AGENDA ITEM NO.3 - CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: September 22, 2009 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name: Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. Name: Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. Name: Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION Agenda Item # _et Meeting Date September 22, 2009 LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon • Issue /Agenda Title Award of Contract for Construction of the Hall Boulevard Crosswalk North of the Fanno Creek Bridge Prepared By: Dennis Koellermeier Dept Head Approval: City Mgr Approval: ISSUE BEFORE THE LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD Shall the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve a contract award for construction of the Hall Boulevard Crosswalk north of the Fanno Creek Bridge? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve a contract award to Signal Construction Group in the amount of $91,903.00 for construction of the project. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY • A pedestrian crosswalk to provide safe crossing for Fanno Creek trail users is proposed to be installed on Hall Blvd north of the Fanno Creek Bridge. • The crosswalk will include flashing beacons, at and in advance of, the crosswalk; pavement marking, and permanent signing. The beacons, which operate on solar power, will flash for a predetermined amount of time when activated by a pushbutton on either side of the crosswalk. • Completion of the crosswalk will connect the existing Fanno Creek trail west of Hall Blvd to a new trail on the east side of the street, to be constructed concurrently with the crosswalk under a separate project. • Because Hall Blvd is a state route, a has been obtained from ODOT for installation of the crosswalk. • • The project was adyertised for bids August 18, 2009 in the Daily Journal of Commerce and August 20, 2009 in the Times. A project addendum was issued to modify the size of an electrical conduit. Bids were publicly opened September 3, 2009 and the bid results are: EC Company Portland, OR $81,451.00 Signal Construction Group Woodburn, OR $91,903.00 Engineer's Estimate Range $89,000 to $98,000 • Although EC Company submitted the lowest bid, it did not acknowledge Addendum No.1. EC Company's bid is therefore not responsive and does not meet the requirement for contract award. Staff recommends the contract be awarded to the next responsive and responsible bidder, Signal Construction Group. • The construction is tentatively scheduled to begin in early October 2009 and to be completed by late February 2010. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED • None CITY COUNCIL GOALS This project meets goal No. 12, "Transportation," of the Comprehensive Plan, by providing a safe and secure route for pedestrians as specified by the Plan. ATTACHMENT LIST Project location map FISCAL NOTES Costs related to the project are as follows: - Construction: $91,903.00 - Deposit to ODOT: $10,000.00 (for illumination testing, signal inspections, technical assistance during the construction) - Traffic engineering: $8,700.00 Total project cost: $110,603.00 This project is funded in the amount of $98,000 through a combination of local funds and Washington County's MSTIP 3 Bike /Pedestrian Fund in FY 2009 -10. • PROJECT LOCATION MAP . City Hall ■ i i O ' / i i&-• Z i i f o o I I I Pedestrian Flashing Beacon . J . — — — = ,,,,� \ \-,-.. \` Proposed Crossing Beaverton– Tualatin Hwy (Hall Blvd) �\ Hall Blvd Bridge ��\ _ Hall P\ - ‘IN . .............. __/. / ,---,._ i ) \__. 1 Proposed 8' Wide Sidewalk ` I. Library / Y �. I / V / I t I I 1 cc /' l Proposed ■ 'mac \ /, // . Pedestrian Bridge /' � UU���pY -� • *° „�,�1�p������\�� Proposed Elevated Boardwalk - wee�as Wetlands • l . / ____ . . . I . . . . . • • ' • ” : (ff. \ Wetlands / l • Agenda Item # ��� �• Meeting Date September 22, 2009 LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title Award of Contract for Construction of the Fanno Creek Trail and Woodruff Bridge (from Hall Blvd to Fanno Creek) 1.� D Prepared By: Dennis Koellermeier Dept Head Approval: , City Mgr Approval: (q ISSUE BEFORE THE LOCAL CONTRACTREVIEW BOARD Shall the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve a contract award for construction of the Fanno Creek Trail and Woodruff Bridge? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve a contract award to Civil Construction in the amount of $139,130.00 for construction of the project, KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY • The new trail will begin on the east side of Hall Blvd, then southward to just north of Fanno Creek. A timber pedestrian bridge will be installed in conjunction with the project to connect the new trail to the existing trail behind the Library. • A new crosswalk light will be installed under a separate contract at approximately the same time with this project to provide safe crossing for Fanno Creek trail users. • To minimize potential negative impact to the wildlife habitat, the trail's alignment is confined to the southwest corner of the open field north of Fanno Creek and rather than a paved path, an elevated boardwalk will be installed for the trail. • The project was advertised for bids on August 18, 2009 in the Daily Journal of Commerce and on August 20, 2009 in the Times. Ten bids were opened on September 3, 2009 and the bid results are: Civil Construction The Dalles, OR $139,130.00 CR Woods Trucking Newberg, OR $143,489.90 Parsons Excavating Portland, OR $145,215.50 GVS Contracting Newberg, OR $154,210.00 Somona Pacific Construction Happy Valley, OR $163,945.50* 2KG Contractors Milwaukie, OR $173,090.00 PCR Inc. Beavercreek, OR $179,350.00 Columbia- Cascade Construction Boring, OR $183,311.50 Brant Construction Vancouver, WA $189,390.00* Rutan Construction Hillsboro, OR $199,715.71 Engineer's Estimate Range $100,000 to $110,000 * Somona Pacific Construction's and Brant Construction's bids were disqualified due to their failure to sign and acknowledge Addendum No. 1. • The lowest bid submitted by Civil Construction is higher than the Engineer's estimate range but relatively close to the next two lowest bids. This indicates that the project was underestimated. e Staff has reviewed Civil Construction's bid and recommends the contract be awarded to this responsive and responsible bidder. • Upon Council approval of the contract and after the Notice to Proceed has been issued, the contractor will have 120 days to complete the project. The construction is tentatively scheduled to begin in early October 2009. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None CITY COUNCIL GOALS This project meets goal No. 8, "Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space," of the Comprehensive Plan, by creating a Citywide network of interconnected on- and -off road pedestrian and bicycle trails as specified by the Plan. ATTACHMENT LIST Project location map FISCAL NOTES Costs related to the project are described as follows: - Construction: $139,130.00 - Bridge engineering: $6,000.00 - Bridge material treatment: $3,000.00 Total project cost: $148,130.00 This . project is funded in the amount of $110,000 through Washington County's MSTIP 3 Bike /Pedestrian Fund in FY 2009 -10 and local funds. The department will apply savings from other CIP projects to fund the balance. PROJECT LOCATION MAP i . ! City Hall • • 1 i i . ,' 6' / . 1 i , Z !!!- I I ., e..' , (.) t 1 , ; ■ , i i i g. i i I f i / Pedestrian Flashing Beacon I I -.--- -- --_ . . ..... --__ ____-------_----,-..--' 1=9111 --------- -7 .,‘..‘:',.,- \-- \ Proposed Crossing ..- Beaverton-Tualatin Hwy (Hall Blvd) ---/- *)— -------- Noll =OM ' e : ' . ,_, ...... ..... _-,,._-;----...---- , -- 7 .-- -7- -- --7 / / ..... • \-- , ....--;:, ,.., ,.': ••:: --7 X---`* - '- / / \ ' 1 , . / F ..•..•••.,.... ...., .. .• .. _ .. .. . ... , ; ,_•...._,,I . , __ Proposed 8 ___...._._ __... , 1-----1 / ' VVide Sewalk id----- -.1-2-,---, -- 7 \ 7 Libra ly / I /' ) 1 i / , ' ■.. / - 4c ej --.--- , / ( . . . " . / • • ' . • • • • \ c. () o c , / / . ' / Proposed . . ..•.•. . . . . . 1 li . \ c o • \\:.,...,,_,.....„,,,lk /' 11, 1 ! / , ' • ' • " ' .. Pedestrian Bridge . . . • . • . . . . • ' , . 1"kg"kg\ ----- . . . . • ' - f \‘\\ I Proposed Elevated Boardwalk ....-",-.. .,„;„,;„,; - 7\ . - ' • W e tl a Ls .. : 1 .. i . ' . . . . . . . . . . .• . . . . .,/ . 4i'''‘‘\.\\"\ ' ' • • . \ \ (1. .. .---.. ---. .7. .• :: .. • : . „ .:.: ... . i .. .. i . . . • • ' . . . . • - ' - • N • • - • . • ' • " - . . . • . • .. . • . • . . . : . ...Wetla nds :•. . i .. , .;. . , . ,) i / . •., • r . • . - . . • . : ' :' • • • • • : • • • • • - . • 1' . • . . ' I • • ' • : • : • : • : • . .. . - .... : • . :. 1. \ : • - • • : • . . • . • . • . • I • • • .• • .. . • • Agenda Item # `I. � C Meeting Date September 22, 2009 LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title: Award of Contract for Construction of the Hoodview Drive Sewer Reimbursement District No. 45 Prepared By: Dennis Koellermeier Dept Head Approval: _1 JIB City Mgr Approval: C�7 ISSUE BEFORE THELOCAL CONTRACT' REVIEW BOARD Shall the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve the contract award for construction of the Hoodview Drive Sewer Reimbursement District No. 45? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve a contract award to Canby Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $298,490.00 and authorize an additional amount of $29,800.00 to be reserved for contingencies and applied as needed as the project goes through construction. The total amount committed to the project is therefore $328,290.00. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY o On August 11, 2009 Council approved the formation of Sewer Reimbursement District No. 45. o The project will result in approximately 1,800 lineal feet of 8 -inch sanitary sewer main and 600 lineal feet of service laterals to provide sewer service to 25 lots on Hoodview Drive and Kable St. ® The project was advertised for bids on August 18, 2009 in the Daily Journal of Commerce and on August 20, 2009 in the Times. One project addenda was issued. Eleven bids were received at the bid opening conducted at 2:00 PM on September 1, 2009. The bid results are: Canby Excavation Canby, OR $298,490.00(lowest bid) GVS Contracting Newberg, OR $323,703.88 North West Kodiak Construction Sherwood, OR $351,992.00 Parsons Excavating Inc Clackams, OR $408,375.40 Rutan Construction Inc Hillsboro, OR $419,685.03 Sonoma Pacific Vancouver, WA $437,593.89 LS Henriksen Construction, Inc Tigard, OR $454,431.55 Excel Excavation Inc Tualatin, OR $499,576.00 K &E Excavation Inc Tualatin, OR $530,862.50 Kerr Contractors, Inc Woodburn, OR $536,423.00 Elting Northwest, Inc Gladstone, OR $736,870.00 Engineer's Estimate Range $308,000 to $416,000 ® Canby Excavation submitted the lowest responsive bid of $298,490.00. The lowest bid is slightly lower than the estimated cost range in the Engineer's estimate. • Staff has reviewed Canby Excavation bid and has determined that the bid prices for the construction items are appropriate and complete. Staff recommends approval of the contract award to this lowest responsive bidder. • Upon. Council approval of the contract and after a Notice to Proceed has been issued, Canby Excavation will be required to complete the construction within 75 calendar days or by the end of December 2009. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A CITY COUNCIL GOALS The proposed Reimbursement District meets Goal No. 2, "Complete the update and begin the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan ", by providing the area currently on septic systems with sewer service as required by the Plan. ATTACHMENT LIST Project location map FISCAL NOTES This and other Sanitary Sewer Extension projects are funded in the amount of $1,300,000 in the FY 2009 -10 Capital Improvement Program. The fund is sufficient to award a construction contract of $298,490.00 and to provide a contingency amount of $29,800.00 for a total project commitment of $328,290.00. \en9\2009 -2010 fy cip\hoodview san sew dist 45 - file # 0635 - 95160 \council\9 -22 -09 hoodview san sewer contract award ais.doc HOODVIEW DRIVE — REIMBURSEMENT DIST NO. 45 FY 2009 -10 SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION PROGRAM A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 SECTION 11 T2S R1W W.M. ni l ' ps I H lull LADY MARION DR W (r) ; i ,___ j%��jjj SATTLER ST • W HOODVIEW ____ fr . Pppw/,pp % K AB % j _ ii- � - LE ST . Ar .,. KABLE ST mingrigge• KA BLE ST KABLE sT i i 7 , A lt i lila" AN' M a A N. NEN 1.1 Alm r NAEVE ST ` J __ HIGHLAND DR $1.1/1 --, . HI D � . Z L_ �•• w . w VICINITY MAP NTS Agenda Item # y, 02 . C7' Meeting Date September 22. 2009 LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title: Award of Contract for Construction of the Baylor Street /72n Avenue Sewer Reimbursement District No. 46 Prepared By: Dennis Koellermeier Dept Head Approval: 1)}c City Mgr Approval: cR ISSUE BEFORE THE LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD Shall the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve the contract award for construction of the Baylor Street Sewer Reimbursement District No. 46? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve a contract award to GVS Contracting in the amount of $349,944.38 and authorize an additional amount of $34,900.00 to be reserved for contingencies and applied as needed as the project goes through construction. The total amount committed to the project is therefore $384,844.38. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY • On August 11, 2009 Council approved the formation of Sewer Reimbursement District No. 46. • The project will result in approximately 3,100 lineal feet of 8 -inch sanitary sewer main and 900 lineal feet of service laterals to provide sewer service to 38 lots on 72n Ave, Clinton St, 70 Ave and Baylor St. • The project was advertised for bids on August 18, 2009 in the Daily Journal of Commerce and on August 20, 2009 in the Times. Two project addenda were issued. Thirteen bids were received at the bid opening conducted at 2:15 PM on September 1, 2009. The bid results are: GVS Contracting Newberg, OR $349,944.38(lowest bid) Canby Excavating, Inc Canby, OR $368,000.00 LS Henriksen Construction, Inc Tigard, OR $389,179.88 Rio Underground Construction Beaverton, OR $430,000.00 Parsons Excavating Inc Clackams, OR $448,891.90 D & T Excavation Inc Canby, OR $448,982.30 Ground Hawg Environmental Happy Valley, OR $466,917.65 Rutan Construction Inc Hillsboro, OR $482,124.78 - Sonoma Pacific Construction Co Happy Valley, OR $483,830.95 North West Kodiak Construction Sherwood, OR $498,800.00 C & M Construction Sherwood, OR $501,224.40 Kerr Contractors, Inc Woodburn, OR $552,070.00 Excel Excavation Inc Tualatin, OR $558,574.00 Engineer's Estimate Range $352,551.00 to $403,636.00 • GVS Contracting submitted the lowest responsive bid of $349,944.38. The lowest bid is slightly lower than the estimated cost range in the Engineer's estimate. • Staff has reviewed GVS Contracting bid and has determined that the bid prices for the construction items are appropriate and complete. Staff recommends approval of the contract award to this lowest responsive bidder. • Upon Council approval of the contract and after a Notice to Proceed has been issued, GVS Contracting will be required to complete the construction within 80 calendar days or by the end of December 2009. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A CITY COUNCIL GOALS The proposed Reimbursement District meets Goal No. 2, "Complete the update and begin the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan ", by providing the area currently on septic systems with sewer service as required by the Plan. ATTACHMENT LIST Project location map FISCAL NOTES This and other Sanitary Sewer Extension projects are funded in the amount of $1,300,000 in the FY 2009 -10 Capital Improvement Program. The fund is sufficient to award a construction contract of $349,944.38 and to provide a contingency amount of $34,900.00 for a total project commitment of $384,844.38. i:lenpt2009.2010 fy ap baytor 72nd ave san sew reimbursement dist file 06581counad9 -22 -09 baylor -72nd san sewer contract award als.doc BAYLOR ST /72ND AVE SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 46 FY 2009 -10 SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION PROGRAM A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 NE 1/4 SECTION 1 T2S R1W W.M. 9 0 ti 7 2ND AVE 72ND AV E 0 72ND AVE \\ ` \\ \ \ \\ \\\\ `� & 7v2Zt 1Nk\‘ ;IN .N c \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • N , , s,\., \\:,.\\ NI N .........,.., \ czi .‘ TH AVE 70Th AVE o 1 J \ Q J cl- Q 69TH AVE ■■ 6 ,■„ \ 68TH PKWY 68TH PKWY r I 68TH PKWY \ c \ /' VICINITY MAP NTS Agenda Item # S� Meeting Date ��' �� .2 007 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Tide Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Update on Capital Construction Projects j' Prepared By: Liz Newton Dept Head Approval: `— CA City Mgr Approval: �� .K1/11-Cif ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL An update on Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (I'VF&R) capital construction projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION No action necessary. This is an informational presentation. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY TVF &R Representative Cassandra Ulven will provide an update to City Council on the status of the District's capital constuction projects. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N /A. CITY COUNCIL GOALS N/A ATTACHMENT LIST None. FISCAL NOTES N/A Agenda Item # l�J Meeting Date September 22, 2009 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title Metro Council President David Bragdon — Intertwine Program for Connecting Parks Presentation Prepared /► D ared B : Dennis Koellermeier Dept Head Approval: 'I City Approval: ` 1� P By: P PP Mgr PP roval: ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Metro Council President David Bragdon will show a presentation to introduce the Intertwine Program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Consider being a part of the Intertwine Alliance. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY • Metro recently introduced the Intertwine, a brand to encompass the idea of connected green spaces in the Metro area. • The Intertwine is the result of non - profits, state and local agencies, businesses and people from across the region who would like to: - invest in new natural area protection and safeguarding water quality - add more miles of regional trails and greenways - fund environmental education to produce the stewards of tomorrow - expand our region -wide network of parks, trails and natural areas - preserve and restore fish and wildlife habitat. - collectively benefit the parks, green spaces, and trails of the greater Portland Metro area and the many different providers. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None CITY COUNCIL GOALS None ATTACHMENT LIST 1. PowerPoint Presentation 2. Intertwine Parking Day Info Sheet. 3. Intertwine Promotion including Parking Day FISCAT • Noms There are no immediately known costs associated with the Intertwine. Attachment 1 i �t a� 4 y � 4 a dim -.ter y �, � A� • � .1, - ; . y 0 ! ' ,.: ..!'9�¢' ` e a , ' r' f ` '. C A ow %) " 4, • _, ' --e% /k,it;' st * ' y ' r,„ ; , -4 5 %,- , . .1 r a x 1 4 40 j ' • �' ` X41 • .i..,.....; 4 , "" *•11 T Y 1, , - ,, _ * r- , i%1 . • % y • Ve The Intertwine Presentation to Tigard City Council September 22, 2009 David Bragdon, Metro Council President _.4 el y„ _ 7 'qir p t ' , a ?h , i ?+� . .. , , r fib + �,j ''..tie:' w . 1 ; ' ' _e. 3 • '" ' '. tr. ' 4 s �Y A ; Ds, / ` f, '' � } M1 4 , l . . �, r R ` ' +.- '! ,;, Y 4 � � 4 t � 4 s � � i ` F . A % 4 k 1. .:.. ...... .>x -- .a+ J `r w ° . • "! •-., "N ,-i stp. •%'• ,, , . . ,, .. ( . '. .1 ' • . a • 4 , ` 1i • ' ( i di• �' j R , ' r � �. t . - ! ' Ii • $ s 'Y • "'.. `, ;I, ' � Z : .? l" °.i ..° ! I- it' • - ;4 fir { • . 4. , I '. 1 ,it 4 ' ' f * ' r F , 1 ; ' 1 c, ,, 1 , • - 4' - -:' . ,:, ' . . k . . , ,,. ,.. .,....,,, , . . , v,..,, ,... , ,,,..„ , 2 .' , 1 :„-fr ., 4- 5 r ; p, • 7 `F • - N I s • e i. i ,..: • • "+�►V. . t « a r • +'� fi _ ! - -A , i` -, . r • ` t, / • L '' ,� , r , r x a i f ' 1 ) ,,...,,,,.-_J.,_,1- y Y C,w l,l g 7 . L d � l arcs i > s a f a j � M M1 �< 15q 16��+t�,�4 t h ' a ��g; �1. „ 0. � ^ ,gab 4 `9 ° :tom 11 gx N '': . ,,, ' '1::';'1'ijrt?'!''Wk-t,_'717I'l 't ' pt � ,y II 'C "' ri d e •,,, y g' S ' +r sj . 4 ., rM t � 0. E R . , - .;' , ,,,F, r un e °^ ` r a 'i ■ • L • # , r 1 E 4 1 , ...t. .,0 s i vill, i ' il 1, .tIt ' i I + ` ,, , .. .4 . r; t "t■r, . • tt 4 t 'y . \\ -a,, i, k • � i C i p . M -, a ! .. • L . s f 10 Mr • � � ; . .f ' Vi i,. �� ®+ i • _ x - fYC ,I ss • /, 1 1 + it 1. 1. 4. : 43. • ft H 4 „ I ti. i 0. ! �- i ■ o9 s o c1et�r, AG yt 0.�LN f ra ; L S � ..t ` � , O d ;' ",• ill 1 ,J y # 1 z A � U �ded it+�9�ry 9jC N rr,4rn � � ` A'DE,, 14 A I Y CLACKAMAS HappyVal ley J" Connecting COUNTY - 'r`�tines 0 k Nature OF GR FS 4 /�Q s ; KAISER Ai rr I, AP "' Barlow Trail POIR.TLAND 1 'ciliW PERMANEME. throve rove I ` URBAN Association OS Greenspaces INSTITUTE —„:-...-- C ,OUNr)- VANCOUVER - CLARK' 4 PAR S& r � 40 v :��� CONSERVING LAND x z Recreation - for PEOPLE ',Vic.. 4' vANcotivER ffi I` I , , ,.r4 ,l," J ? / Ali PORTLAND PARKS & RECREATION 41 1111111 Healthy Parks, Healthy Portland CleanWate Services ® Metro 1 People places. Open spaces. and many more... ,` - fg fir4,0 111=11 LV ! irk 4 i f 0 . IP ir 0 * 4 i • , • 11 * tille .., f • • • I . ,,, : . 0 • • Air 4" w . 000 • 'it r lt 41 P - - I , . lb # - 14 o pot "Aiii # kW. • ii. ce. Liu 10 lirlia I 2 oV0 " 1••4 # sj140, mow , I '''''' • \ * II • • •... „. !1 „ , • 4, - V. 4.„. , .. , ' 7,,, ,„ , dol. 1 1, 4 - - • 4 4 Ar ' k i • - 4 ., . t ! It. . f ..., . , 10 , .. li "t- 7-r– le, . . • -- 4:— , . 'f % , 0 S * * ' ‘1 11 Op 4 ' . . .%.. 4-- a e' • d' 1 4 it ■ l . 4 e .. AM „.. ia .• rr uoileaaw Z m sda 1aed pooLpoqq6iaN ,. , .sr, s al ICaaa dse .... u pl.� q z z rn � awno f d 1 J L , A ll y L Alblint ' 1 -1 44 ; r. I ...... .... __ 4 Mississippi Cuivre % River Greenway ro w Greenway _ ` Conflusltc• — - Missouri River '""' ay Greenway Western 4F . 5 Greenway TI il. Great Rivers Greenway 1)i-t r: The River Ring ''l Missouri Rive Greenway Chicago _fori �:. 1V�errtmec Greenway T Wilderness M i sslssippi � ..._ , ., ,,,. River G wa --, , s Q _. } L#J for bloelwnity ---. ._..m.-.......0 ______„, d., , .1.1„ Great Rivers Greenway District f..i }` H OUSTON WILDERNESS It i air !%attire Intertwine Alliance Initiatives Restoratio Conservation Education CORE A TEAM Regional Trails System r T , . i' a Il ( {. � ' . r ti (« � { , t y , .‘:. ' k A ' . .. .. , ... s., ... , A d .7,,,.ii kl, Di 4 f i '. yr , ' ti`s � ' 4 4 T' fY 64 tV Ihil w Z t trio--,,,t„„..,.., ...zo ,' t - • t y . . I N i ''* ' t 4 t ' f '1 t E 0' . Attachment 2 Join Us in Introducing "The Intertwine" Participate in Park(ing) Day, September 18, 2009 and help us introduce our new name and brand for T H E the Portland region's outstanding network of INTER parks, trails and natural areas. TWIN E What is Park(ing) Day? Park(ing) Day is a one -day, global event to highlight the need for more urban open space, rethink the way green space can happen, and improve the quality of urban human habitat...at least until the meter runs out! The San Francisco art collective REBAR first i t �. F created "PARK(ing)" in 2005 to re- imagine the . potential of the metered parking s ace. E This year in the Portland / Vancouver region we `= . ` ,. n�i t 1IFi wfR. -:�' i F 7 - are using the occasion of Park(ing) Day to launch a new name and brand for the region's • network of parks, trails and natural areas — The Intertwine. Walk, hike, bike, bird, paddle, play — whatever you love to do and wherever you love to do it — if you're doing it in the Portland / Vancouver area, you are already using The Intertwine. The Intertwine brings the region's parks providers, nonprofits, government agencies and private firms together behind a unifying name and brand — and we need your help! How Do I Participate? On Park(ing) Day 2009, we want the residents of the Portland / Vancouver metropolitan area to wake up to discover The Intertwine — created in parking places throughout the region! Ideally, we would have Park(ing) Day parks to represent every park and natural area in the region. While we are likely to fall short of this ideal, we are asking nonprofits, friends groups, private firms, parks providers and creative, fun - loving residents to create mo AIL kk parks on Park(ing) Day. The more parks we have, the more fun and impactful Park(ing) Day will be. Choose a parking space that will get high foot traffic and be easily visible and call us. We will help with parking permits (if needed, check local requirements) and can answer any questions you may have. Also, we'll supply an Intertwine sign and a handout that will include all of The Intertwine sites for Park(ing) Day as well as information about The Intertwine. How Do I Get a Parking Permit? We are very fortunate to have great support from The Portland Bureau of Transportation and are available to assist you in getting parking permits for sites in the City of Portland (required). Vancouver will require a street use permit, but will not charge for it. Check to see if your city does or call us for help finding out what is required for your Park(ing) Day location. How Do I Create a Park? You can make your park look pretty much any way that you want, the more creative the better. Make your space inviting so that passers -by will want to stop and visit. A basic park design includes sod, a bench or two, a tree, some safety cones, and an Intertwine sign. You must create a buffer to separate the pedestrians from the road. Determine beforehand what you will do with your materials at the end of the day. Donating them to local organizations or groups is a great idea. If you get materials donated to you, please be sure to thank the donors and give them recognition for their generosity (some places may not want publicity, so please check first). You must leave your parking space as clean as or cleaner than you found it. Sod is messy but if you lay tarps down first you will protect the sod and make the clean up easier. Brooms and dustpans also help. The City of Portland can charge you if the space is dirty /messy when you leave. What Happens on Park(ing) Day? Create your site first thing in the morning on September 18 Intertwine sites should be ready between 8:30 and 10 a.m. and stay open until 3 or 4 p.m. The permit for your parking space should be for the whole day. Pickup trucks are helpful but Park(ing) Day parks have been transported many ways, including exclusively or partially by bicycle! 1111 .r 1111 kkikr N Ai 11 11 Setup and break down is easier than it may seem. A team of 4 -6 people is sufficient, depending on the scale and complexity of the design. Potted trees are heavy and require at least two strong people to lift and move. There is generally a lot of downtime after the park is set up, so bring something to do! Games are also a great way to attract visitors to your park. Can I Promote My Organization on Park(ing) Day? You can have information available about your nonprofit or friends group — or just about The Intertwine. Park(ing) Day is designed as a celebration of parks, trails and natural areas and is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising and promotion. The Intertwine Alliance will be contacting the media and will have a press conference at one of the Park(ing) Day sites at 10 a.m. on Friday, Sept. 18. Things to Keep in Mind ❑ Let us know if you are planning to create a park and support The Intertwine ❑ Design your park as creatively as you like ❑ Focus on creating an inviting public space ❑ Use materials that can be donated, lent, or borrowed ❑ Decide how you will transport your materials y ` ❑ Place orders for items that must be `it �� ' shipped or specially ordered pp p Y �. . ❑ Talk with staff and friends about volunteering for your park , ,, : ❑ Create talking points for staff and " }` ' s+ volunteers — or use ours ❑ Order sod (if you're using it) ❑ We'II give you fliers and buttons �, ; ‘,0„0 ❑ Plan for photos or filming of your park , v;:: ❑ Determine who will be the ° :' spokesperson from your group at your park To get involved or sign up, contact The Intertwine Alliance care of: Bob Gandolfi bobevents(.comcast.net 503 - 295 -6500 11n 1111 01, gh II 11 = 1111 kk oro Attachment 3 THE INTER TWINE BIRD NURTURE DOKE, NATURE FLY A KITE , 411114111 „,_ ex plore NATURE IS ALWAYS NEARBY. Intertwine for Sunday runs on the Wildwood Trail or to simply sit under the trees in their neighborhood. Clean air to breathe. Clean water to Paddlers on the slow- moving waters of the Tualatin enjoy. Trails to explore and parks to River delight in The Intertwine, just as rafters do when they shoot the rapids on the Clackamas River. play in. The wealth of nature at the If you live in Tigard, you might enjoy The heart of The Intertwine gives us the Intertwine while watching your kids play soccer at promise of having one of the greatest Cook Park. A million people each year travel the park, trail and natural area networks Springwater Corridor in Gresham and Southeast Portland — it's The Intertwine's most -used and in the world. best - developed regional trail. If you're in West Linn or Oregon City, Willamette River boat launches gives you easy access to recreation and Walk, hike, bike, bird, paddle, play — whatever you water adventures on The Intertwine, too. love to do and wherever you love to do it — if you're doing it in the Portland area, you are already using The Intertwine is our connected network of parks, The Intertwine. trails and natural areas in the Portland, Oregon and Vancouver, Washington metropolitan region. For some, The Intertwine is time spent with the family dog in a local park. For others it's a quiet walk in the woods at Tryon Creek State Park. Every 11 11 morning thousands of folks get on their bikes and 11 11 1111 use The Intertwine to get to work. Others use The 4 4 Norrompr e. „ 1. . L� ,mot , , RI t `.;:. - 'o' SUPPORT THE INTERTWINE 11 ), `ti `ti =' y` N. jS 1 ...41 .� ' - Making The Intertwine world -class is the work of t The Intertwine Alliance, a group of non - profits, ti, tt r, state and local agencies, businesses and people � I'S r R ' ■ from across the region working to support The l ∎ * . t.. l' "+ 4 Intertwine locally and globally by: C4'.":4' a '_ •i ' �,3 a+ 1. Investing in new natural area protection _ • ,< ' i a nd safeguarding water quality ' ' 'lrl g g 9 1.'-it ' P+ Adding more miles of regional r , V ; i trails and greenways sr ■ ` •' l :; Funding environmental education to ' produce the stewards of tomorrow • r Expanding our region -wide network 3 of parks, trails and natural areas Preserving and.restoring fish Help plan, protect and and wildlife habitat C promote The Intertwine. 1 For more information about The Intertwine BECOME A p p Alliance and how you or your organization can join PARTNER the effort to support The Intertwine, contact info @theintertwine.org. PROMOTE THE INTERTWINE .._ You can show your support r_ "" • - by usingThe Intertwine logo 4 t ► Ir. elne ,. on your websites, brochures, THE p low - maps and collateral. TWINE Raise awareness of N way s � J *' The Intertwine with 'ar0y 1" ' , campaign -style SUPPORT a e ea 4,7'R lawn signs. 1 THIS FALL. Wear your love of The `� Intertwine on your sleeve MIKE Nan theintertwine.org with these buttons, perfect " " " " " ` will include maps, themed to share with stakeholders, NWITUe N ATUNE itineraries and resources that partners and groups. showcase the region's parks, trails and natural areas. For more information, contact Cynthia Sulaski at csulaski @eomcast.net or 503- 249 -7728. PARK(ING) DAY FRIDAY, SEPT. 18TH • PORTLAND, OREGON Park(ing) Day is an annual, one -day, global event where artists, activists, and citizens collaborate to temporarily transform metered parking spots into temporary public parks and natural areas. Help people discover The Intertwine by participating in Park(ing) Day and sharing information about our region's amazing — and growing — network of parks, trails and natural areas. "Park(ing) Day" is a registered servicemark of Rebar Group, Inc. CHARTER PARTNERS Audubon Society of Portland Barlow Trails Association • Clean Water Services Metro • Portland Parks & Recreation • Travel Portland The Trust for Public Land Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation District Urban Greenspaces Institute Agenda Item # �? Meeting Date September 22, 2009 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title Revised Building Fees Sched e ,/ �j Prepared By: Carissa Collins Dept Head Approval: City Mgr Approval: C 13' 0 .2.(1 ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the City of Tigard increase Building fees for residential and commercial construction? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Revised Building Fees Schedule. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Building Fund is a self - supported dedicated fund in which all inspections, plans review and building support services are paid with revenues obtained through the purchase of permits. The purpose of the increase in fees is to allow the City to continue to offer a full service Building Division to the Tigard community. The Division has incurred a dramatic decrease in revenues within the last year and a half due to the economic downturn nationwide. As a result, in December 2008, the Building staff was reduced from 17.8 to 6.2 F1'E. At the end of FY 2008 -09, it was evident that a $550,000 shortfall still existed within the Building Fund. Subsequently, the budget committee recommended and Council approved, as part of the FY 2009 -10 budget, a $300,000 transfer from General Fund. This was accompanied with direction to propose an increase in building fees to yield the additional $250,000 in revenue to offset future budget shortfalls. In June 2009, a comparable fee study was conducted with neighboring jurisdictions including Beaverton, Tualatin, Wilsonville, Sherwood, Lake Oswego, West Linn, Gresham, and Hillsboro. It is proposed to adopt various parts of Beaverton's, Hillsboro's, and Wilsonville's fee schedules plus a 6% across the board increase to generate the additional $250,000 of revenue. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Do not pursue an increase in Building fees. The City will continue to experience a $250,000 shortfall in Building Division revenues. CITY COUNCIL GOALS N/A ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment #1: A Resolution amending the portion of the Master Fees & Charges Schedule pertaining to Building Division Fees including Exhibit A FISCAL NOTES Based on permit projections, it was estimated that approximately $250,000 revenue would be generated as a result of the targeted fee increase. INDEX OF SHEETS 1 PD GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS CITY Of' T I G Ali D A H,,..4 .9412) TAYLOR'S RY 1A PD2 KEY MAP N 2 X1 SW BURNHAM STREET TYPICAL SECTIONS 0 1 , i G 0 A Rom 3 X2 SW BURNHAM STREET TYPICAL SECTIONS 3A X2 -T OVERLAY AND UTILITY TRENCH TYPICAL SECTIONS 4- X3 SW BURNHAM STREET TYPICAL SECTIONS 0. 5 X4 SW BURNHAM STREET & PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS PLANS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT a < NORTH DAKOTA TYPICAL SECTIONS 0) ,s it 6 X5 SW ASH AVENUE & SW HALL BLVD TYPICAL SECTIONS BURNHAM STREET s., � 7 ER1 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN oe o y I- '-'I A , o 8 ER2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN BARROWS M BEET jY ro 9 ER3 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS K 10 L1 BURN AND PROFILE STORM 1 +00 TO 3 +50 STREET, SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAIN & WATER IMPROVEMENTS It Q = ate° 11 L2 BURNHAM STREET & STORM STREET MCDONALD PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 3+50 TO 6+00 MAIN STREET TO HALL BOULEVARD BULL MOUNTAIN RD g 12 L3 BURNHAM STREET & STORM BONITA RD PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 6 +0D TO 9 +50 TO B E SUPPLEMENTED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD DESIGN STANDARDS DATED JULY 15 199 m < 13 L4 BURNHAM STREET & STORM \ / PROJECT LOCATION N/ PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 9 +50 TO 11 +95 14A L5 BASE BURNHAM STREET & STORM c ' ' C B ° PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 12 +11 TO 16 +00 eEEp DURHAM 14B L5 ALT1 BURNHAM STREET & STORM PLAN STA 12 +11 TO 16+00 ,4. RIVER 14 L5 BURNHAM PLN AND P OFI E, STA 12 +11 TO 16 +00 _ ��� 15A L6 BASE BURNHAM STREET & STORM P * � `� � VICINITY AP PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 16 +00 TO 19+00 � o 15B L6 ALT1 BURNHAM STREET & STORM PLAN STA 16 +00 TO 19 +00 15 L6 BURNHAM STREET & STORM PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 16 +00 TO 19+00 16A L7 BASE BURNHAM STREET & STORM PN AND PROFILE, STA 19 +00 TO 22 +00 16B L7 ALT1 BURNHAM STREET & STORM PLAN STA 19 +00 TO 22 +00 S SET INCLUDES 16 L7 BURNHAM STREET & STORM ��..1= '� PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 19 +00 TO 22 +00 ���t� _�. P 17 LB ASH PLANUANDSTREET PRO Fl &ESSOTA +DO TO 5-1-00 �� c� CONSTRUCTION BIDDING OPTIONS 18 L9 ASH AVENUE STREET & STORM 4 �__ P PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 5 +00 TO 9 +50� ' ='� / BASE BID — MAIN ST. TO ASH AVE. FULL CONSTRUCTION: P 18A L9A ASH AVENUE STREET & STORM � — —� STREET AND SIDEWALK PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 9 +50 TO 11 +24 19 L10 HALL BLVD. STREET & STORM P f STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 0 +00 TO 3 +00 0 / •17V4... on SANITARY SEWER 20 L11 BURNHAM STREET & STORM 0 / '%.C) IA , WATER MAIN OUTFALL #1 PLAN AND PROFILE, STA "OF -1" 0 +00 TO 5 +00 \ Q Q �� , LANDSCAPING 21 Cl CURB RETURN DETAILS w `-� STREET LIGHTING 22 C2 CURB RAMP DETAILS / \' -J UTILITY ND SIGNING 23 C3 DRIVEWAY DETAILS Q ® / P � G �� ` 24 C4 DRIVEWAY DETAILS P O �� Q �. -J STREET OVERLAY 25 C5 DRIVEWAY DETAILS y I 26 C6 DRIVEWAY DETAILS q-/ 14—. " 1 101_ j 27 C7 DRIVEWAY DETAILS 28 CB STREET DETAILS T `. Il � ADD ALT 1 — ASH AVE. TO HALL BLVD. UTILITY CONSTRUCTION 29 C9 STORMWATER OUTFACE #1 DETAIL --� UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING 30 C10 STORMWATER OUTFALL #2 DETAIL 57 SS1 BURNHAM ST. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN 94 VZL4 VERIZON LOCAL UTILJTY PLAN, STA 12 +00 TO 16 +00 31 C11 STORMF1LTER UNIT DETAILS PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 1 +00 TO 6 +00 95 VZL5 VERIZON LOCAL UTILITY PLAN, STA 1 6 +00 TO 19 +00 ADD ALT 2 — ASH AVE. TO HALL BLVD. ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION: 32 C12 STORMWATER PLANTER DETAILS 58 SS2 BURNHAM ST. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN 96 VZL6 VERIZON LOCAL UTILITY PLAN, STA 19+00 TO 22 +00 STREET AND SIDEWALK 33 C13 STORMWATER PLANTER DETAILS PLAN AND PROFILE STA 6+00 TO 9+50 97 VZB1 VERIZON BUSINESS UTILITY PLAN, STA 1 +00 TO 6 +00 STORM SEWER, FILTER CARTRIDGES 34 C14 STORMWATER PLANTER DETAILS 59 SS3 BURNHAM ST. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN 98 VZB2 VERIZON BUSINESS UTILITY PLAN, STA 6+00 TO 9 +50 WATER MAIN 35 C15 STORMWATER DETAILS PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 9+50 TO 12+11 99 VZB3 VERIZON BUSINESS UTILITY PLAN, STA 9 +50 TO 12 +00 LANDSCAPING 36 C16 STORMWATER STRUCTURE DETAILS 60 SS4 BURNHAM ST. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN 100 VZB4 VERIZON BUSINESS UTILITY PLAN, STA 12 +D0 TO 16 +00 STREET LIGHTING 36A C17 PIPE DATA SHEET 1 PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 12 +11 TO 16+00 101 VZB5 VERIZON BUSINESS UTILITY PLAN, STA 16 +00 TO 19 +00 SIGNING AND STRIPING 36B C18 BASE PIPE DATA SHEET 2 61 SS5 BURNHAM ST. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN 102 VZB6 VERIZON BUSINESS UTILITY PLAN, STA 19 +00 TO 22 +00 36C C18 PIPE DATA SHEET 2 PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 16 +00 TO 19 +00 103 NWN1 NWN UTILITY PLAN, STA 1 +00 TO 6+00 37 LS1.1 BURNHAM LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN, STA 1 +00 TO 7 +00 62 SS6 BURNHAM ST. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN 104 NWN2 NWN UTILITY PLAN, STA 6 +00 TO 9+50 38 LS1.2 BURNHAM LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN, STA 7 +00 TO 13 +00 PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 19 +00 TO 22 +00 105 NWN3 NWN UTILITY PLAN, STA 9 +50 TO 12 +00 38T LS1.2T BURNHAM LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN, STA 7 +00 TO 13 +00, ALT 2 63 SS7 ASH AVENUE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN 106 NWN4 NWN UTILITY PLAN, STA 12+00 TO 16 +00 39 LS1.3 BURNHAM LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN, STA 13+00 TO 18 +50 PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 1 +00 TO 5+00 107 NWN5 NWN UTILITY PLAN, STA 16 +00 TO 19 +00 40 LS1.4 BURNHAM LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN, STA 18 +50 TO 22+00 64 SS8 ASH AVENUE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN 108 NWN6 NWN UTILITY PLAN, STA 19 +00 TO 22+00 41 LS1.5 ASH AVE LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PIAN, STA 4+00 TO 6 +00, STA 9+00 TO 11 +24 PLAN AND PROFILE, STA 5+00 TO 10 +00 109 TW1 TIME WARNER UTILITY PLAN, STA 1 +00 TO 6+00 42 LS2.1 BURNHAM PLANTING PLAN, STA 1 +00 TO 7 +00, NOTES & LEGEND 65 SS9 SANITARY & WATER MAIN DETAILS 110 TW2 TIME WARNER UTILITY PLAN, STA 6 +00 TO 9+50 43 LS2.2 BURNHAM PLANTING PLAN, STA 7 +00 TO 13 +00 66 5510 SANITARY & WATER MAIN DETAILS 111 1W3 TIME WARNER UTILITY PLAN, STA 9 +50 TO 12 +00 `2• 241 • p q 43T LS2.2T BURNHAM PLANTING PLAN, STA 7 +00 TO 13 +00, ALT 2 67 SS11 SANITARY & WATER MAIN DETAILS 112 TW4 TIME WARNER UTILITY PLAN, STA 12 +00 TO 16 +00 0 PR OF. f + 44 LS2.3 BURNHAM PLANTING PLAN, STA 13+00 TO 18 +50 68 SS12 SANITARY & WATER MAIN DETAILS 113 TW5 TIME WARNER UTILITY PLAN, STA 16 +00 TO 19+00 fT 45 LS2.4 BURNHAM PLANTING PLAN, STA 18 +50 TO 22 +00 69 SS13 SANITARY & WATER MAIN DETAILS 114 TW6 TIME WARNER UTILITY PLAN, STA 19+00 TO 22 +00 '\ <C" GIN E `',5: 46 LS2.5 ASH AVE. PLANTING PLAN, STA 4 +00 TO 6+00, STA 9 +00 TO 11 +24 70 SS14 SANITARY & WATER MAIN DETAILS 115 NT1 NTEGRA TELECOM, COT UTILITY PLAN, STA 1 +00 TO 6 +00 ■ „,x F 4 o a 7 LS3.1 BURNHAM IRRIGATION PLAN, STA 1+00 TO 7 +00, NOTES & LEGEND 71 SS15 BURNHAM ST. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN 116 NT2 NTEGRA TELECOM, COT UTILITY PLAN, STA 6 +00 TO 9+50 4& � 64 ' 48 LS3.2 BURNHAM IRRIGATION PLAN, STA 7 +00 TO 13 +00 9 17355 SR Ferry Road PL AN AND PROFILE, STA "0F -1" 0+00 TO 5100 117 NT NTEGRA TELECOM, COT UTILITY PLAN, STA 9 +50 TO 12 +00 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 48T S3.3 BURNHAM IRRIGATION PLAN, STA 13+00TTTO118 +50 ALT 2 73 U2 COMPOSITE MASTER UTILITY PLAN, STA 6 +00 TO 9 +50 119 NT5 NTEGRA TELECOM, COT UTILITY' PLAN, STA 16 +00 TO 19+00 1/I / / -J FA%: Phone: (503; 695 - 5 385 50 S3.4 BURNHAM IRRIGATION PLAN, STA 18+50 TO 22 +00 74 U3 COMPOSITE MASTER UTILITY PLAN, STA 9 +50 TO 12 +11 120 NT6 NTEGRA TELECOM, COT UTILITY PLAN, STA 19 +00 TO 22+00 OR ON _ I 51 LS3.5 ASH AVE. IRRIGATION PLAN, STA 4 +00 TO 6 +00 75 U4 COMPOSITE MASTER UTILITY PLAN, STA 12+11 TO 16 +00 121 15144 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION LEGEND 52 LS4.1 PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 76 U5 COMPOSITE MASTER UTILITY PLAN, STA 16 +00 TO 19 +00 122 15145 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLAN p 53 LS4.2 IRRIGATION NOTES AND DETAILS 77 U6 COMPOSITE MASTER UTILITY PLAN, STA 19 +00 TO 22 +00 123 Si SIGNING & STRIPING PLAN <v�� p PRO F( 9A ' `. „, DO V S Associates 54 LS4.3 HARDSCAPE DETAILS 78 U7 UTILITY DETAILS 124 S2 SIGNING & STRIPING PLAN ` 13, 2 � 55 LS4.4 HARDSCAPE DETAILS 79 PGE1 PGE UTILITY PLAN, STA 1 +00 TO 6 +00 125 S3 SIGNING & STRIPING PLAN C J I NE � / 9 TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS LS4.5 HARDSCAPE DETAILS 80 PGE2 PGE UTILITY PLAN, STA 6 +00 TO 9 +50 126 54 SIGNING & STRIPING PLAN � - G � '''4% NSA M . � � 81 PGE3 PGE UTILITY PLAN, STA 9+50 TO 12 +00 127 S5 SIGNING & STRIPING PLAN tL/ 15,874 NOS SW Fe Aram, Ed* 500 Telephoner (5031243-3500 ATTENTION: Oregon law requires you to follow rules adopted by 82 PGE4 PGE UTILITY PLAN, STA 12+00 TO 16+00 128 S6 SIGNING & STRIPING PLAN �� EXPIRES 12/31/2010 pu repm neM.OsamSA¢ Fax wo243.1234 the Oregon Utility Notification Center. Those rules are set forth 83 PGE5 PGE UTILITY PLAN, STA 16+00 TO 19 +00 129 S7 SIGNING & STRIPING PLAN p in OAR 952- 001 -0010 through OAR 952 -001 -0090 You may 84 PGE6 PGE UTILITY PLAN, STA 19 +00 TO 22 +00 130 S8 SIGNING & STRIPING PLAN ' I 4*3..- YN5^•-tat r ascw owrrswr en obtain. copies of the rules by calling the center. 8 5 CC1 COMCAST UTILITY PLAN, STA 1 +00 TO 6 +00 131 S9 SIGNING DETAILS AGUSTIN P. DUENAS, P.E. (Note: the telephone number for the Oregon Utility Notification OREGON Center Is (5 03) 232 86 CC2 COMCAST UTILITY PLAN, STA .6 +00 TO 9+50 132 El STREET LIGHTING PLAN t " 1 ./ ry G j ENGINEERING MANAGER ENGINEERING DEPARTINENT CALL BE FORE YOU DIG 87 CC3 COMCAST UTILITY PLAN, STA 9+50 TO 12 +00 133 E2 STREET LIGHTING PLAN Q qy 19 ,9 Q 1N P. AUGUST 25 2009 �[ 13125 S.W. HALL BLVD. A h 88 CC4 COMCAST UTILITY PLAN, STA 12 +00 TO 16 +00 134 E3 STREET LIGHTING PLAN S TIGARD, OREGON 97223 �� 1 -800- 332 -2344 89 CC5 COMCAST UTILITY PLAN, STA 16+00 TO 19 +00 135 E4 STREET LIGHTING PLAN r Q J DA 1E • VOICE: 503 - 639 -4171 90 CC6 COMCAST UTILITY PLAN, STA 19 +00 TO 22 +00 136 E5 STREET LIGHTING PLAN CIP20D9 -00001 ' A FINAL PLANS 91 VZL1 VERIZON LOCAL UTILITY PLAN, STA 1+00 TO 6 +00 137 E6 STREET LJGHTING TABLE PROJECT NO. FAX: 503 - 624 - 0752 f� /� ((�� 92 VZL2 VERIZON LOCAL UTILITY PLAN, STA 6 +00 TO 9+50 138 VC1 VEGETATIVE CORRIDOR IMPACT PLANTING PLAN TIGARD T WWW. TIGARD- OR.GOV AUGUST 25, 2009 EXPIRES: 12/312009 BURNHAM ST. IMPROVEMENTS 1.1LTdl3J 93 VLZ3 VERIZON LOCAL UTILITY PLAN, STA 9 +50 TO 12 +00 139 VC2 MITIGATION SITE PLANTING PLAN PROJECT NAME AGENDA ITEM No. 7 Date: September 22, 2009 PUBLIC HEARING TESTIMONY SIGN -UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: REVISED BUILDING FEE SCHEDULE Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 7 Date: September 22, 2009 PLEASE PRINT Proponent — (Speaking In Favor) Opponent — (Speaking Against) Neutral Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Agenda Item # Meeting Date September 22, 2009 LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title Award of Contract for C onstruction of Burnham Street and Ash Avenue Prepared By:KSM Dept Head Approval: A City Mgr Approval: (' ISSUE BEFORE THE LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD Shall the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve a contract award for construction of Burnham Street and Ash Avenue? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve a contract award to: This information will be provided to Council in their Friday packets. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY • This project is a street reconstruction, widening and green street project of Burnham Street from Main Street to Hall Boulevard. The project also includes construction of Ash Avenue from Burnham Street north to the Commuter Rail Park and Ride facility. • Additional information to be provided in the Friday packet. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None CITY COUNCIL GOALS Goal 2. Implement Downtown Urban Renewal a. Move forward with Burnham Street Project ATTACHMENT LIST Project Location Map FISCAL NOTES The Local Contract Review Board has approved $5.1 million for Burnham Street and $250,000 for Ash Avenue in the FY 2009 -2010 Budget. Additional information to be provided in the Friday packet. /&/0 C r M MEMORANDUM TIGARD Agenda Item No. Meeting of q . of a • 09 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kim McMillan, P.E., Construction Services & Engineering Manager RE: Award of Contract for Construction of Burnham St and Ash Ave DATE: September 18, 2009 Staff Recommendation: Staff Recommends that the Local Contract Review Board, by motion approve a contract award to Kodiak Pacific Construction, Tualatin, Oregon, in the amount of $4,006,663.65 based on: Base Bid, Base Bid add Alt # 1, and Base Bid add Alt # 2, per the attached Notice of Intent to Award. There is sufficient money budgeted to award the project as bid. Funding Available Ash Street Extension FY2009 - 10 Gas Tax $250,000 Water SDC $100,000 Water CIP - $ 40,000 Total $390,749 Burnham Street Improvement FY 2009 -10 Gas Tax $3,200,000 TIF $ 950,000 TDT $ 100,000 Underground Utility $ 300,000 Water CIP $ 556,463 TOTAL $5,106,463 c: Ted Kyle, Interim City Engineer Dennis Koellermeier, Public Work Director Toby LaFrance, Finance Director i:teng\2009 -2010 fy ciptbumham street improvement 0353 - 1\council items 9- 22- 09Ynemo to city council for awareded bumham.docx 11 • • • • T I GARD City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 www.tigard - or.gov NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD INVITATION TO BID BURNHAM STREET IMPROVEMENTS CIP #2009 -00001 Staff will recommend to the Tigard Local Contract Review Board that the contract for the City's Burnham Street Improvements be awarded to: Kodiak Pacific Construction PO Box 886 Tualatin, Oregon 97062 The amount of the recommended contract, including the base bid (less transaction items), add alternate #1, and add alternate #2, shall be Four Million Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Three and 65/100 Dollars ($4,006,663.65) based upon the results of the formal Invitation to Bid process. The Local Contract Review Board will review this recommendation at their September 22, 2009 meeting at Tigard City Hall located at 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, Oregon 97223 at which time public comment will be taken. oVotd Co- ca Agenda Item # q hAMS t- - f ��� Meeting Date September 22, 2009 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title Periodic Review Grant Submittals for funding an Economic Opportunities Analysis and a Wellhead Protection Plan CG #1 .4e• Prepared By: Darren Wyss Dept Head Approval: , ,�a : a.�� City Mgr Approval: W/I Fry C r ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the City Council approve a resolution endorsing the submittal of Periodic Review Grant applications for performing an Economic Opportunities Analysis and a Wellhead Protection Plan? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval, by motion, of the attached resolution endorsing submittal of the applications. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Periodically, cities and counties are required to evaluate their comprehensive plans and land use regulations through a process called periodic review (ORS 197.628 -644 and OAR 660, Division 25). On May 20, 2008, the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) notified the City of the commencement of periodic review for Tigard. Based on the City's evaluation and comments submitted by citizens and state agencies, staff developed a periodic review work program, which was presented to City Council on January 27, 2009. At the meeting, Council approved the work program (see Attachment 2) and directed staff to submit the documents to DLCD. The next step in the process was for DLCD approval of the work program. However, based on the uncertainty of budget appropriations for periodic review grants, DLCD temporarily suspended approving any additional work programs in March 2009. This included the City of Tigard work program. In the meantime, the state budget was adopted with adequate appropriations for periodic review grants and DLCD has once again begun the process of reviewing work programs for approval. More importantly, applications for periodic review grants have been distributed and the deadline for submission is November 1, 2009. Although the City of Tigard work program has not yet been approved, DLCD staff recommended submitting grant applications in anticipation of work plan approval. Two City of Tigard work program tasks (see Attachment 2) identify periodic review grants as the funding source. City staff is seeking Council approval to submit two grant applications, one to perform an Economic Opportunities Analysis, and the second to develop a Wellhead Protection Plan. Timely submission of the grant applications will provide the opportunity to utilize available state funds, as opposed to City funds, to perform these tasks. I: \LRPLN \Council Materials \2009 \9 -22 -09 PeriodicReviewGrantSubmission AIS.doc OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Do not approve the resolution. CITY COUNCIL GOALS Goal 1: Implement the Comprehensive Plan ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment 1: A resolution supporting Periodic Review Grant applications to perform an Economic Opportunities Analysis and a Wellhead Protection Plan Attachment 2: City of Tigard locally approved Periodic Review Work Program FISCAL NOTES The proposed grant requests are for a total of $65,000. There is no required match, but in -kind contributions of City staff time and materials are encouraged to aid in completing the products. I: \LRPLN \Council Materials \ 2009 \ 9-22-09 PeriodicReviewGrantSubmission AIS.doc ATTACHMENT 2 City of Tigard Periodic Review Work Program ` 4111 January 30, 2009 t 10 A 1) Task 1: Public Facility Planning (Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 11) 1. Develop a Public Facilities Plan in accordance with Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 11 and OAR 660 - 011 - 0010 -45. Revise cooperative and urban service agreements consistent with ORS 195 as appropriate. Address and inventory sanitary sewer, water, storm drainage, and park facilities; identify programmed and planned facilities, assess conditions Anticipated Completion Date: March 2010 2. Prepare hearing ready Comprehensive Plan Goal 11 element with conforming plan text amendments Anticipated Completion Date: March 2010 3. Prepare staff report and findings Anticipated Completion Date: April 2010 4. Council adoption of updated Public Facility Plan and conforming Plan text amendments Anticipated Completion Date: August 2010 Funding: City Staff Time Task 2: Incorporate Technical Analysis of Clackamas River Water Right Extension into Tigard Comprehensive Plan (Statewide Land Use Planning Goals 5 and 11) 1. Identify relevant technical analysis from Lake Oswego /Tigard water extension right granted by Oregon Water Resources Dept. (to be coordinated with Lake Oswego and WRD staff) Anticipated Completion Date: January 2010 2. Prepare staff report and findings Anticipated Completion Date: January 2010 3. Council adoption of technical analysis into Tigard Comprehensive Plan Anticipated Completion Date: January 2010 Funding: City Staff Time Task 3: Groundwater and ASR Protection (Statewide Land Use Planning Goals 5 and 11) 1. Update Drinking Water Source Area maps Anticipated Completion Date: December 2009 2. Identification of potential contaminant sites Anticipated Completion Date: December 2009 3. Develop Wellhead Protection Plan Anticipated Completion Date: August 2010 4. Certification of Plan by Oregon Department of Human Services and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Anticipated Completion Date: December 2010 Funding: City Staff Time, Technical Assistance from DHS and DEQ, Periodic Review Grant ($30,000) Task 4: Economic Opportunity Analysis (Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 9) 1. Conduct an Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA) including a commercial and industrial lands inventory and needs analysis (examination of adequate supply of commercial and industrial land according to OAR 660 -009.) Address industrial and commercial land use needs projections; determine the amount necessary to meet commercial and industrial needs; revise commercial and industrial buildable lands inventory. Anticipated Completion Date: May 2010 2. Prepare final EOA meeting requirements of OAR 660 - 009 -0015 Anticipated Completion Date: June 2010 3. Prepare hearing ready Comprehensive Plan Goal 9 element with conforming plan text amendments and staff report and findings(per OAR 660 - 009 -0020 to OAR 660 - 009 -0025) Anticipated Completion Date: August 2010 4. Council adoption of EOA and plan text amendments Anticipated Completion Date: December 2010 Funding: City Staff Time, Periodic Review Grant ($30,000) Task 5: Transportation System Plan Update (Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 12) 1. Update Tigard's Transportation System Plan and prepare staff report and findings (per OAR 660 Division 12) Anticipated Completion Date: February 2010 2. Council adoption of updated TSP and conforming Plan /code text amendments Anticipated Completion Date: June 2010 Funding: City Staff Time, TGM grant awarded to City for completion of update during the 2009 calendar year Task 6: Population and Housing Review (Statewide Land Use Planning Goals 10) 1. Participate in the Metro "Making the Greatest Place" process to update population and employment projections Anticipated Completion Date: August 2009 2. Review household income data and housing policies of comprehensive plan for consistency Anticipated Completion Date: August 2009 3. Compare new housing costs and household incomes Anticipated Completion Date: August 2009 4. Review residential development /design standards and development processes /standards for reflection of community vision Anticipated Completion Date: August 2009 5. Evaluate ordinances for compliance with Fair Housing Act and state manufactured home statute Anticipated Completion Date: August 2009 6. Evaluate duplex lot size allowed in single family zoning to ensure consistency with comprehensive plan designations Anticipated Completion Date: August 2009 7. Review housing needs of low income and special needs population and develop strategies to meet needs Anticipated Completion Date: August 2009 8. Prepare staff report and findings for necessary code /plan updates Anticipated Completion Date: February 2010 9. Council adoption of code /plan updates Anticipated Completion Date: February 2010 Funding: City Staff Time, Metro Assistance Task 7: Community Development Code Update: Table 320.1 (Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 14) 1. Research and data collection Anticipated Completion Date: August 2009 2. Prepare staff report and findings Anticipated Completion Date: August 2009 3. Council adoption of amended Community Development Code text Anticipated Completion Date: December 2009 Funding: City Staff Time Task 8: DEQ Hazardous Site Database (Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 6) 1. Revise Land Use Application to include provision to submit DEQ database search results for property under consideration. Anticipated Completion Date: August 2009 Funding: City Staff Time "Ieiiy.ered in G. 18.09 (Dun c; tuxisie,ttuu .pa ., Agenda Item # ) 0 Meeting Date September 22, 2009 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue /Agenda Title Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Project Proposal, CG #2 Prepared By : D. Roberts Dept Head Approval: 46 City Mgr Approval: 7 CM CV)/ (; ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should Council adopt a resolution endorsing the submittal of a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) project application? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution authorizing submittal of the application. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The CDBG is a federal program that annually provides more than two million dollars to Washington County to fund activities that benefit low and moderate income persons. The County distributes the money to local jurisdictions and nonprofit agencies based on project applications submitted by sponsors. It currently is accepting project proposals for the 09 -10 funding year. The application deadline is 10/09/09. Last year, the City requested and was awarded CDBG funds to infill sidewalk gaps along SW Garrett Street. During this cycle, the City proposes to partner with Community Partners for Affordable Housing (CPAH) on the submittal of a CDBG proposal to partially finance sidewalk and associated public improvements along the street frontages of the Knoll senior housing project. There is a documented need in Tigard for affordable units for seniors. The entire project will target seniors earning less than 50% of area median income. As presently proposed, CPAH would receive and administer any CDBG grant funds awarded. CPAH's Knoll funding partners would provide a substantial local dollar match for the CDBG funds. The City's role would be one of project supporter, encourager, and facilitator, but would not include providing any hard dollar contribution or grant administration. Active support for the Knoll is consistent with the City's stance regarding this project up to now. Direct City financial assistance has included two Fee Assistance awards and, in future, will include property tax exemption. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Simply endorse a CPAH - originated grant proposal. Grant funds are awarded on a competitive basis. Co- sponsorship implies the highest degree of City support for the senior project. It is intended to strengthen the chances of the application being selected for funding. I: \LRPLN \Council Materials \2009 \9 -22 -09 AIS Knoll CDBG Application.doc 1 CITY COUNCIL GOALS City Council Goal #2. Implement the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan. The senior housing project is located within the urban renewal area and may activate other development within the area. ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment #1: A resolution of the Tigard City Council supporting an application for federal assistance for constructing sidewalk and related improvements along portions of SW Hall and Knoll Streets. FISCAL NOTES A grant request in the $250,000 range is proposed. No City dollars would be involved. Any grant funds awarded would be administered by CPAH directly and would not be passed through the City. The City would not be a signatory to the IGA for the receipt of any grant dollars and would assume no liability for their use. I: \LRPLN \Council Materials \2009 \9 -22 -09 AIS Knoll CDBG Application.doc 2