The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 06/19/2007 } 4 f TIGARD CITY COUNCIL A 3 RKSHO,P MEETING # June 19, 20,07 CO U ` 1CIL MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED I.\Ofs1'Don na's\Ccpkt2 } TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & r CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT ® AGENCY WORKSHOP MEETING June 19, 2007 6:30 p.m. TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:3012.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, est. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Dea~. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, est. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Dean. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA -June 19, 2007 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING 6:30 PM 1. WORKSHOP MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 6:35 I'M 2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL WATER BOARD Staff Report: Public Works Department • Council Discussion 7:35 I'M 3. MEETING WITH OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION 1 MANAGER, JASON TELL Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 7:55 PM 4. RECEIVE UPDATE ON HIGHWAY 99W CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8:25 PM 5. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM • Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8:40 PM 6. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON PROPOSAL TO CREATE A COMMERCIAL CRIME UNIT AND USE AN INCREASE IN THE BUSINESS TAX TO FUND THE NEW POLICE DEPARTMENT UNIT • Staff Report: Police Department • Council Discussion COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA -Dime 19, 2007 page 2 1. Recess City Council Meeting Convene City Center Development Agency Meeting • Call to Order • Roll Call 9:101'1\1 7. CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9:30 I'M 9. ADJOURNMENT is\adm\cathy\cca\2007\070619.doc . COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA - June 19, 2007 page 3 Agenda Item No. o For Agenda of a q, 8 deJ Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes Date: June 19, 2007 Time! 6:30 p.m. Place: Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon Attending: Mayor Craig Dirksen Presiding Councilor Gretchen Buehner Councilor Nick Wilson Councilor Sydney Sherwood Councilor Tom Woodruff Absent: Agenda Item Discussion & Comments Action Items follow u Workshop 1.1 Mayor Dirksen called the City Council to Order Meeting at 6:33 p.m. 1.2 Council Present: Mayor Dirksen, Councilors Buehner, Sherwood, Wilson and Woodruff. 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports There were none. 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items City Manager Prosser said there were two items to discuss at the end of the meeting - the National League of Cities Award and an Executive Session. 2. Joint Meeting Public Works Director Koellermeier reported that . Councilor Buehner asked with the he had three items for discussion. He announced for legal review on liability Intergovernmental that the third ASR well, which has been drilled to a issues. Water Board depth of 998 feet, shows early indications of being a very good well. He reported that the Willamette River Water Coalition Board voted last evening to accept a settlement with Water Watch and the Water Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 ] Agenda Item Discussion & Comments Action Items follow u Resources Department over our extension of the water rights on the Willamette River which guarantees access to this water through the year 2047. Councilor Sherwood noted using Willamette River Water would take a vote of the people. Public Works Director Koellermeier said that condition still exists; the option is just being kept open. Public Works Director Koellermeier introduced Clean Water Services Water Supply Project Manager Tom VanderPlaat who presented a PowerPoint on the transfer process for the Hagg Lake Dam Raise Project. Mt.VanderPlaat said the Hagg Lake Project is currently a federal facility but the government is looking at transferring it to local control. This would remove a substantial amount of cost and time on potential projects such as raising the darn level to help meet the future demand for water in the Tualatin Basin. He said title transfer means ownership of Hagg Lake, the dam, buildings, land, easements, rights, legal liability, regulatory requirements and other elements. Public Works Director Koellermeier said a decision is before the Council whether or not to remain in the Tualatin Basin Water Supply project. He distributed a third amendment to the joint Funding Agreement for IWRM Water Supply Feasibility Study for Council review. This amendment commits Tigard and the other partners through the next project phase, including the title transfer of Hagg Lake. Public Works Director Koellermeier said he had concerns about spending more money on a project that the City has yet to decide whether to remain in or not. He said if the City Council or IWB takes no action it would eliminate them as participants. He said that while the amendment funding the next project phase requires commitmdnt from Tigard in July or August, the first payment would likely not be due until November. If the City decides not to go forward within that time period the could terminate before the payment is made Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 2 Agenda Item Discussion & Comments Action Items follow u and prior shares would be distributed among the remaining partners. Public Works Director Koellermeier said the staff recommendation is to remain in the partnership at this time, especially if this can create a west side water source. Mayor Dirksen said Tigard would have no interest in the title transfer to local control if there is no dam raise. Councilor Woodruff asked if the City could participate on a quarter-by-quarter basis. Public Works Director Koellermeier said that it could. In response to a question from Councilor Sherwood, Mr. Koellermeier said this partnership alone will not meet Tigard's overall water needs. Mayor Dirksen said that Tigard does not have an opportunity to get all of its water from the other primary choice (partnering with Lake Oswego). Mr. Koellermeier agreed, saying, " The only option that would meet all of Tigard's future needs from a single source is the Willamette River." Councilor Buehner said she would feel uncomfortable making a decision without advice from a lawyer regarding the transfer of legal liability. She said she was surprised that other jurisdictions have not yet sought this information. She asked if cities would be indemnified for any liability for things occurring prior to the transfer. Mr. Koellermeier said he would get an opinion from the City Attorney on whether it could be negotiated into the contract. 3. Receive Update Mayor Dirksen noted that ODOT Region 1 City Manager Prosser will on Highway 99W General Manager, Jason Tell was in the audience ask Finance and Corridor for the next item, Agenda Item No. 4, and he Information Services Improvement and invited him to join in this discussion. Department Director Management Plan Sesnon to research how Engineer Duenas thanked the citizens for their much payroll tax is paid to involvement in the Highway 99W Corridor Study Tri-Met from the Tigard Project which is now at a decision phase. He gave area. Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 3 Agenda Item Discussion & Comments Action Items follow u a PowerPoint presentation and discussed the project timeline and goals, which include: • Identify transportation and land use needs along the corridor. • Develop solutions for 99W that help to accommodate regional and local travel. • Develop solutions for Highway 99W that balance the different modes of travel and provide for direct, safe and efficient connections between the different modes. • Reduce reliance on the motor vehicle as a mode of travel using Highway 99 • Ensure that solutions enhance the livability of the City of Tigard and the surrounding area. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation is on file in the City Recorder's Office. Mr. Duenas introduced the three concepts, noting that each alternative comes with trade-offs. The three concepts are: • Concept A - Partial widening (Metro Regional Transportation Plan calls for widening to seven lanes from I-5 to Greenburg Road) • Concept B - Access Management • Concept C - Full Widening (Seven lanes throughout the corridor) He gave the criteria for evaluation and noted that all concepts contain the same enhancement along the corridor. He said Concept B was rated best for pedestrians. Concept B is also best for bicyclists and for mass transit. Concept C is best for motor vehicles. Mr. Duenas asked Council for their input on the concepts. Councilor Buehner said the concepts appear to be similar to some that were developed 15 years ago but not built. She noted that the frontage roads that used to be along 99W were closed b ODOT. Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 4 Agenda Item Discussion & Comments Action Items follow u Councilor Buehner noticed that none of the options include frontage roads. Engineer Duenas said frontage roads are not off the table. Mayor Dirksen said that backage roads would consolidate driveways but still provide access from the first developed area. Councilor Wilson said he agreed with other Council members speaking tonight and hoped to combine this with land use planning and access management. He stated that if the road between Fanno Creek and 217 was connected, a lot of traffic would be relieved from 99W. Councilor Wilson said bike paths were seldom used and not cost effective. He suggested coming up with a bike network that is off-line but parallel, and not having a bike lane on every arterial. Councilor Wilson asked how much is generated for Tri-Met from Tigard payroll taxes. He said Tigard needs to push for better bus service by either having Tri-Met redistribute or by operating our own private service. City Manager Prosser said a meeting was held with Tri-Met in the past and reasons given for the service level were fuel costs and the lack of our own post office; 97223 is actually part of Portland and funds are distributed by zip code. City Manager Prosser said he would request that Financial and Information Services Manager Sesnon obtain financial figures from Tri-Met. 4. Meeting with ODOT Region 1 Manager Tell said he was ODOT Region 1 surprised at how Tigard's City Council is thinking Manager, Jason about implementation and he was impressed with Tell their effort at seeking solutions to issues raised. Councilor Sherwood asked Mr. Tell what things can be done to obtain more federal funding. Region Manager Tell suggested taking the study and focusing on specific projects that can take advantage of opportunities: Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 5 Agenda Item Discussion & Comments Action Items follow u • Reprogram MTIP funds • Federal Reauthorization Bills are coming up in 2009 and Tigard is in a good position to talk to lobbyists and congressional offices. • Reach out to legislators for state funding bills. Councilor Woodruff stressed that Highway 99W is the major road to the central coast and is a very well-traveled road. Region Manager Tell said he only has $17 million per year for modernization. He suggested that Tigard work with ODOT during the next round of STIP updates. He said Tigard can make the argument that they are making a local effort (gas tax) to help solve their transportation problems. Councilor Wilson asked, "Are projects not on the highway right of way - but that help the right of way - ever considered?" Region Manager Tell said. "Yes, if it can be clearly demonstrated that a project is equal to or less than the improvement to the state road." He said if there was a specific quantifiable project in mind, it can be submitted. Councilor Buehner said she was concerned that the legislature did not pass a state gas tax. She asked if ODOT could help educate the public on how far behind on road improvements the State is. Mayor Dirksen said another project that is not a 99W project but that would help with 99W traffic is the I-5/ 99W connector. He said Tigard supported it at this time but would be less inclined to support it, and possibly would oppose it, the farther south it slides. City Manager Prosser asked if Tigard representatives should be contacting the Transportation Commission directly. 'He asked for suggestions on preparing the most effective presentations for their consideration. Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 6 Agenda Item Discussion & Comments Action Items follow u Region Manager Tell said the most important thing is to be ready with written requests when the time for input comes. He said he was pleased that Tigard's Council is aware of opportunities and is working on them. At 8:35 a break was called by Mayor Dirksen. Council came back in session at 8:45 p.m. 5. Consider Long Range Planning Manager Ron Bunch gave a Amendment to brief staff report on an amendment to the Affordable affordable housing fee assistance fund guidelines. Housing Fee This amendment adds a provision allowing funds Assistance not allocated during a budget year to be donated to Program the Community Housing Fund of Washington County. He said if Council desired, a condition could be added requiring funds to be spent in Tigard. Councilor Sherwood said she dislikes putting unspent money back into the general fund when it was appropriated for affordable housing. She said there is a shortage of housing and the shelter is full. Ramsey Weit, Community Housing Fund Executive Director, was present. He said the Community Housing Fund is a non-governmental, 501(c) (3) agency that helps local governments provide housing choices to working families and those on fixed incomes. He thanked the City Council and Associate Planner Roberts for leadership in the affordable housing arena and for the City's progressive tax policy. He said he hopes Tigard's downtown provides a range of affordable housing. Council consensus was that they agree with this proposal to amend the affordable housing guidelines to allow funds not allocated during a funding year to be donated to the Community Housing Fund of Washington County, with the stipulation that this money be reserved for projects located in Tigard. Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 7 Agenda Item Discussion & Comments Action Items follow u 6. Receive Police Chief Dickinson and Business Manager Briefing on Imdieke introduced this agenda item. Mr. Imdieke Proposal to said staff met with the Tigard Chamber of Create a Commerce, Chamber Business Advocacy Group, Commercial Rotary, Tigard Triangle, Washington Square and Crime Unit and others to present a proposal to create a Use an Increase in Commercial Crime Unit, paid for by a Business the Business Tax Tax increase. He reported that the response to Fund the new received was favorable with no group expressing Police Dept. Unit opposition. Suggestions were made, including one to specify that revenues raised be earmarked for this use. Business Manager Imdieke discussed the current business tax basis and Scenarios 1-5. A copy of the "Business Tax Rate Alternatives Pros/Cons" list is in the City Recorder's office. In response to a question from Councilor Sherwood, Mr. Imdieke said home-based businesses are included. Council discussed the pros and cons of each scenario and the consensus was for Scenario #2. Business Manager Imdieke said the City should consider changing this into a business license since some businesses requested a "certificate" useful for other purposes. City Manager Prosser noted that in instances where the City has problem businesses, a business license that could be revoked could be considered regulatory. City Manager Prosser noted that the creation of the Commercial Crime Unit would require amending the Tigard Municipal Code and the Fees and Charges Schedule. He said it also requires a budget amendment to appropriate the new revenue and establish spending authority. Police Chief Dickinson said staff will come back in August with a proposal for Council approval. Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 8 Agenda Item Discussion & Comments Action Items follow u 7. City Center Mayor Dirksen recessed the City Council and Advisory called the meeting of the City Center Development Commission Agency to order. Deputy Recorder Krager called (CCAC) the roll. Presentation on Urban Renewal City Center Advisory Commission member and Marketing Suzanne Gallagher gave a PowerPoint presentation and on branding the urban renewal project. She Con-ununications stressed the importance of creating a consistent visual image and suggested that a logo, tagline and style guide be developed to market the urban renewal area. She said this logo would: > Establish immediate recognition of the urban renewal project > Create One Voice identity for all communications > Support the City of Tigard logo CCAC Member Gallagher said her committee suggested "Renewing the Heart of Tigard" as a tag line/slogan idea. Councilor Wilson expressed agreement with the idea of a focused presentation. He said he would prefer to see Tigard aim for a large master plan project with enough critical mass to spur development in the commercial area. He suggested looking beyond Portland, even nationally, for potential developers. Councilor Wilson presented slides of maps showing demographics and high tech cluster locations in the Washington County area. He said Tigard was favorably located and in a position to package this information to developers. Mayor Dirksen asked Ms. Gallagher if the logo idea was solely for the urban renewal district or if it could be used to identify Tigard at the gateways into the city. He asked if this was a corporate logo for the CCDA. Ms. Gallagher said that it was. Councilor Sherwood said, "We just spent a year and a half developing a new logo, colors and font. I'm reluctant to spend more time developing another logo. We're not just selling the urban renewal district, but the whole city." Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 9 Agenda Item Discussion & Comments Action Items follow u Councilor Woodruff expressed appreciation for the citizen committee's work and enthusiasm but said it was important to get information from the consultant about what would get the attention of the people the City wants to attract. City Manager Prosser said Tigard needs to determine what our market is and then ask what can be done to build on the existing city brand. He said a consultant had been hired to help with this definition and that working on a new logo for the downtown may be premature. Councilor Sherwood mentioned the recent tour of Port Moody, Canada that she, Councilor Wilson and other local government representatives attended. She suggested that another tour be arranged so that CCAC members, business owners and others from the Tigard area can have the opportunity to visit Port Moody. Councilor Wilson said Port Moody is a suburban community similar to Tigard in size and proximity to larger city that has done high density well, with quality construction. Former Downtown Task Force Member Lisa Olson noted that the word, "heart" was often used to describe the downtown area. She reiterated the need for cohesive, professionally designed marketing materials. Community Development Director Coffee referred to his prior experience with two redevelopment projects - one in Corvallis, which attracted the largest shopping center developer in the country, and one in Lake Oswego. He stated that it wasn't the logo that brought them in; it was the fact that they had something to offer a developer and the developer could make money. Mayor Dirksen thanked the CCAC members for their input. He said this would be revisited in conjunction with the marketing effort.with the .consultant. Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 10 Agenda Item Discussion & Comments Action Items follow u Councilor Wilson asked Community Development Director Coffee to brief Council on the economic consultant's scope of work. Community Development Director Coffee said Dave Leland's scope of work includes assessing the Downtown Improvement Plan and the components of the Urban Renewal Plan in relation to current and future market conditions. He said Mr. Leland is one of the foremost experts in his field. City Council At 10:26 p.m. the City Council was reconvened for Reconvened discussion of two additional items. City Manager Prosser asked Council if there was interest in sending two City staff people along with display materials for a booth at the National League of Cities Conference in New Orleans. Council consensus was not to do this. 8. Executive At 10:31 Council entered into an Executive Session Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660 (2) (e). Executive Session ended at 10:36 p.m. 9. Adjournment The Council meeting was adjourned at 10:36 p.m. Councilor Woodruff made a motion to adjourn and Councilor Sherwood seconded. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. Councilor Sherwood Yes Councilor Wilson Yes Councilor Woodruff Yes Mayor Dirksen Yes Councilor Buehner Yes Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 11 Carol ager, Deputy City Recorder Attest: Mayor, i f Tigard Date: ' o Tigard City Council Minutes - June 19, 2007 12 Agenda Item # a Meeting Date June 19, 2007 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue/Agenda Title Joint Meeting with the Intergovernmental Water Board (IWB) Prepared By, , Dennis Koellermeier Dept Head Approval: City Mgr Approval: U v r IssuE BEFORE THE CouNcu. No action required. The Council is being asked to participate in a discussion on current water-related issues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Participate in a discussion on current water-related issues. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION Sum ARY The City Council and the M will discuss the following water-related issues: Briefing on major capital projects: ■ Aquifer Storage and Recovery #3 ■ 555-Foot Zone Reservoir Water source discussions on: ■ The Tualatin Basin Water Supply Project, also known as the Hagg Lake Dam raise project CleanWater Services Project Manager Tom VanderPlaat will brief the group on this project and a possible third amendment to the funding agreement in support of the title transfer process. ■ Willamette River Water Coalition projects OTHERALTERNATrus CONSIDERED None CrIY COUNCII. GOAIS None AT rACt IlVmvT LIST None FISCALNOTEs Not applicable ,r 1 ~t°¢~''~''~"1~:~'~+n"r~.:~,`:-''s,~~~"yy.t~~'?'b'i'';&i 4p4^,.rma~',.. iAp;~'°I~:'Ci^~,."^:"°E'>;..c+wr-Y'.S."?:s""'~.~:5'P,.~=...:;«.+~<s •a"w._... - l i:aY"r~1." Sey-.:• .>mi+ x<aW .zu4-. cf':. ~i[`q" _ ;•Y•:i x Yiy,'~ ~''.'';W '5,=. .>:ts ' ~{,K z' ''.fr ..i ~ t':'.s, :Y -z :•,~i. -'~:'4x'F ~ .Z%' let ":°i'.. >aj:"';• `~R. ~'t; - ;z .y;~;.- '::cx"s~::i i' ..~~y A:P2~., - 3ni`~y'4'-Y~=#';Y. H. ~`4fd<}C£x' ry~kE4 ..ly, e:! +.xlky% rj'~~_•aF:. ~y'2`: '?Sd-c. x)a if:l''' '@~' ' ~.s - e:° ~`"'s,~.~ ,~,%~a°,~':7a`'•:%'a''~'~^~~r;=<;~= :z": t;°;~ zs Sw w~ .<w .niiviexk::mxh.`Nx:k...e .w:<fimAk:+..'~'c•.„ : W, 'Sc..1 `•.r~« > s~"n.`::1.:(5.::<1 ` '+4+_~-<(!5::•r~.l, Y ary:,`_'a, -"~4'• s• 9'6::.ri. ;`i1+." j. "s;. fF•'~ `df"N , t ,esk~;,...i nr,-a `tY"k .~:..„>n'sby F''+:}'+'`,"_3`^y a:wz' iS's'"•==' G '#t'sixn;`.i'L'es't ;u"99:Siye `i ` r< a 3.S A- Mw Bureau„of_ Reoclamatioin€-u. 141 4h.,, £ F ss .d'•" 't, y ' 'zf z:e • li3 a :+3a Mm', C. + k° Co;ISSIO eyr,Jdhn ='retN~red -Z 4';`=' ':FsFr,~aTaT,+ - :,f:s~•.pi5i; s=;.;lyq„+°r •k z~3 't?'`; •n+:• °•t4s'Y•K.•'a. F. :E :r I-:'..y>::~; ;at 6. 4•~ai J.r+:>:i:`q.,c;•,~,~N, ' ' _ ha , r.~ ~:6., f _T"+•: :';:k?.. , :;t•-~l`2x'r ( e_:r+-~::~4'a+""~'~'~ C'y,*-,.rr .;`,,•~;K ` k- + t'"4.-•' ; ~„°.€,'~j - S",,=''..mot t;" .-?',4 , 'Y a~ . ;`a.~."r;,,, r•1 z; v~q •~°p.s: :;;~n~estVat. ;.~~.-7 a t s: w : r: h t v a R c ma ion. _ "-'.s .•Ui ",Ic~i+: <,Si x; ::<tF; n ,~4..:' - -,4~ '"zS<:. ;'^R:_ :.Y,It,%'m. < ,•1.3 ~:e. 's~z`= ' ~Y. • `zf. e;.; r t="'n,Or•%'.>Y•..: ~ st y"':<'•~ t`~: ~ --a,~.'3r<;,~ ' ' i',~:9.,, ~ z'i; sTi tTr~ansfer':Pro ,'i-,n,. ,,F+_£ •~F'<.i.>-y+Z i.:. .:2~~x..%ie'`..: yrjvs'L F L~.~•s<~$„• ,'S..^ ...y.r _ ,:";t a:4.:C a=i'y: :w rE`- .fJa"z- •'.X. :,a'-y ~ 'I•'<Y l.+ cq~s ~'y* .t•, e.f•..,r a;;<a,.'.k-<'; t ' x ii=i:: =~,t,<F ~ . E~ f,d~ °*'f'rn •"':r'.a-~~ y.s' <.";; ':a5b'i~s•-e-r -~'a :if°,`"...tr •'z~.t::>.T' a:'s„• 5<{`q„~`y,, il+¢ _ tz w r+~ - 'f~t.¢i+`~:v :<8 d>:. ^^Y'•~is"v'n _ 1+. YT . rn:."Y.I~A 3i ;t : ~t c: tl''tN 's.f=•.: +s.~T: Fa:<'s :k'i 3Y :$%1'~t.:¢<:v :.Y:::; ..s,.: ''~i. _ it ie t ~.r. \~qxv its,.. ' 4 ' .r~ r h:~ } z• Qy~ 4Z. n :('-t.,4; .w:: .p[k;.. $''tw•s^":`• '`~~o <,'xx=~t'v .:~`r'...,y",;.~-ii?`.,.-c <_."~':r"`•~:. ' 1 , " :Y- »J " zf F'•,i hatT~ra` t.' sY_ ``;L'`: A:.<'"~+.--...:',o:e~.i.....xiPt.;.Y«~:. s<w.^,-..-.. «x:•e~l~:.«1:rL:};. A txrans` r ` an act t a~t chain es; thTe who s, • w P :g:. 4p:.} ,'9.t• .~Sof•f.dor e ci._{ ties to:a: L% _ {{"~~~T: .~~:s%~<i;<" Y- ; ~ ' ~•i ~ $'2.: ,.'✓;sr,.'\'Ek h5+, ~C~i!ft .Lr<';,..a~xx4; ,Y >(v. ;.}.£i=s=F:'.Y ~'Y';.. .sk: '.}~,`"".tri'~.< x~' O'ca ;,y..<• dam, - .J' S.' " :(V ^ k~y _i,, eH;;y',n '.td'.r T..' ~~~j::; aiiy, tyt:•: ~'X;,y~~• ~ Ex~ }x`~'.r~; ¢ ~ {yy,';~''~°' .s~ ~ i :-y.. ~~~`n .1.„: •;nr •t< a,~;'`.§i - ".3 : 7;{u ? 'Us✓ <9 ` F... ..H ;`rn ✓E:Bas►cally local, a_ fY enc~►.es=~ x,• t~ rc ~ Eats-„!; ' n ,would buy thei'exIstfrtgy F , ryn Scoggrns-Dam, Hagg Lakerki 4•, kkw trrig_aon sysfer»sr •x~l1Cr[% 11 -'cad ~O %lll"t `rent~S ? : f d oftidr Reclama#rori::r; ';•s.. '<c.. ` t`~k;>: ,x ~ .fiS ,"s4'"+,,;: o'~,k+4 ~s:x:.'{'~':s"..,..,.;' : 2• ; ~g`'''E r~:k. ' BSc - jzy'x:e Ei` 'T_ `E',v.,i,n.y^•,t,.- .~ia:x?A;;. -,ice`, i...~,Pi'r: _ 'r.•.t;j~{_ Y..!'s = -r F~~.~ - ~f '~Ii x%h-,ys'i4ny, _ - • ,,FP.< `•tt'.:,s xg. - >,r '~~.{I xz{'C ,+~..4y£(Y:Y;<. >t ;z S.s' off;",q:.`.£ ,`:'•tx!'i i-f°}ktN_t >tr t-{d%.S'7"`'~ i'?sa-,~: Y<r.. i%' :;i :"w',5~`° z~2 e„3"1A.: a2%•~ ' ~~w,~,. .wn 4~x .wF„N ^ .R~ ~gi,:::- ~•k. „~qt'~-: °;~~,~3ne ~a9x 5;,:~" trr,. ..xEP<~M;T2•,:-b,,;,fs,~~_.~~'.'~~;m:: 3~,:r.5:kt.,-~_:,,~,'r 1-•'S" ::~`~^'M'~z~'`" 't fir; -1•:, •i,<:" :,y:.."~.°'. s" ~„r`.~s'r==%? i~dr~•,%y~::v h;:9~;,'T:. r'~,"'6j=`^;3.•;• ,4,•,i~"~~~.~~w=:tke.F^ '2.•"<'w >,`,a;, ""mC: _•3.,ys~,;r,&t'.`;i`t~f~~~"':.~: .s.~j4 ..:`•.;y,.:•„;~~.,.,?~,,,," ,.e",,_ _ 4,'s;'. ~•'»;"~a. .~.,~~,.r-. ..`€.!t':xt , VIlhactwo:ul;dbef transferreds'? t£:c,.s~a ,~`,`;2. -x ",?.;°€;j::; i1,<: •i;,=a Z:'s'=i -syi:: =o x ,S n~.. *,3~:. ,fit';,&1,,, : " =k'; * < 8}i:s''.'''~. ~ .•'z-::; .i a~~,^,,~.;i~:«-z ~£F~R,,,st.=- x ± t ',`pw.• ,.:z;,, v, >..ar::3,:"li;:'CCi . ~.t'~\.~~'-,~:~•' i;4,,,,£,,, , ,.a' r .3 '-:.r~~::,,, y_<.s{;t r;~~;, .ai a"m~': s`~y y,,.~_. rr:`=~?',. - t:_`: c - ~ > - t~;. i ,..E _ ::~&x~ >'*.a it s`u`x- „z "TiF'L=•';'~,=;z',.~•-':,?•r sw"•"F ;.~i.;b £,,....»,s`~;:."~'•,'~r;.q?f=::.j~:'-q: tit a ,"saris •?::r.: 'cis~g~$s''.,.~.:~y;.~r9€„ '-io'%'• .»u:.~. P :,Ci" r; i:!~tE '",'.{?„zµ. a::-~>: ..i. -:-Ksc- ~.R?~,{~. ~„?t s.. s~,,z;„: <'..i~ ~`:Ss c a^.t, ~sfq•~±., .4,a .':.?ry ,r~.,F 1,. ~.t~`%" -1, 1 V1.•, . 1'1' y- , 'fie'? x't' YZ,,:.?x4` ~£^x„"i. L•, h,.,s9 : W+'t:'G <:i k`-• .'Y F~''f+'•-_•:Tualatin'P~o ectaFacilities-~<;= LI'- _ ,~,,i - a` .:,.fit` -.:.k;,€rtgz:.,: ~,5+':a•,r e:` _:'S< =r• x+=;+~:{: #;x.*`e;r;':5!`'Y"~~£n`q ~';~:a~y~.r t,:'`;,.;. L°p;S:k„ :><-ter::'; .(a F:-'ki;';" • . ?;?y_. ` :•!3?, ti r".s.zs "`I :'rt.~'!°' v:,F, ,:'YKi,, z Transferof federal.water:'rights a`S xk% { ; t , „s}2~ 5,,: - W_ y4~ r •Fkz:..+ NnY"i, t.' t:.,sr,4 -F,' c.£„ ~ltS.'a ' 0 8 ^5: FE'.%a."•'v'r C;7-3tyi: e'ti. _ ant Ci~ndS~tRS~1'n~`''W,..tt;'~.t:fft ~';pl• ;',e'M1 •t~33':•:{::YSdiit4''.'Sh.'+~+~"`'"':?~:.:' i.°~i..~;)ft'<'r{~~~'-,,';,p;,>k' t`:~,`.:ra;:~+ ~':;y;,~:<it"',F~i'or-~°~;~:£. :..FS .=3r", -~~"zf~ w:t~' "y"`ak'` - a. _r,;;< ..t ,.'y` 'rtYf"f.Z:U ~z?. ~`M z: {%'..<e _p;S. „i t_t. «;,;y : `='~r Y - 4°. ' : f:b`~ : : ~:rr^i$,Y, r; .:taper tion andEMarnten'dn'do -ree ons~bilities ; s `$r Yf"d; ":gy ` ' 4's'. ri ~ ei1£' :'-.C~.'.- ..•:A ??F= , f i~t:~.,:4Lt" ~ - 'E ' , J F~tF,• ° P sx: r AtAr t, t nrts x. 3.:;=„:.." gct'r::. ~~v ~,`"•5' i{: r. t.A.~:'yH''xs, :~e,:.. ^`'Yn 9'~":G~'; :l. ~'i:;,•5'•''-,~ •r,£-:~-` "rod.., ,~,v:' M'.~'<.'tit~;,a: y.'. ,'~:?;a.•;' , ;B:~''; :~.~`i".;~:7•iM,•^ •a'. ii€•=. .{;.,rf i. - - arm.,~,• „t'_s.~a- ..£lr,;,, v+s; :rt'.i+"•Ytu :..y'..~ «~.-.,c V {`:'$a -y~te~ir y .;.T•••a_. 4 ,A x°f^:a~ ✓'L ~ !1,i.-t;~ ES '-~Frs'n :l, C✓. '~;',j'iu ~%:d+•V` v:.'f.?n:.. `',.:Alit ::a. ",S;, iEa ''FS'r "'z^`< iy µ,Y',.A •zr:~i ":V:?v..i, ai 2 k> uW. is :sh=r h.c cr u~l d l a~ca~1='. ~~nte~reseted? 1uz ' Loca'h~awnp r e shy and~coiri-~'rol=:of faci°lities': a p, ,t _ 'skand~waterpri l~fis:wo,~tad~:reduced;ecsion~~~.; ~:#3~,` ,.ria""..~~.'~;~j.: y:~~r err._:,v~r ...:;.t:.i ?ajar-~•,.'.c'.: 3,^.,°:. A:`.'~,.'~ PI{h<1°r;,e,.~.., ?-'tit{!s(n .,.tY a i:. t• s ma;k~ng,Eycomp.lexiiyrand therefore a ;i m ;roveflrexibil '"`M> w x~.1r it€--' ;f :i::. •:~.i:,: nr't+:~f.i„5r` y= :,:~.~.:.:.;..vt.~~4~.k~.,ys:i;•1::~: U!~~.,...: ;T;v.'u "'y~> :.`.'f; ;x~x~:r.. il~ >3 i•,. i. i..;'~~%';'~, •`a'_ .v.0. s^C,E"s .d,.t:.r a~'"' ` i ..I- rPotential 2 of se' =s>>chedule nand; ~'f~,:~~:;=~; ry; .~.f' 3~, ":4ite`;ta ';~'±=`.::::':.i' H~'~;•, ^-d'- i. -,~:~;!-~.;±•,..>.sx :,:_.Jvx.~;n,}..,: g.,,.~,.,,;; .,;w'u."-.: ~aSA'iu_C. •:'C. =':-~'x - tY§:.:ti.="~~., H`..-...,. - =:->.tK:s _ _ "D: i71~ tX 'w•yx_, - a~.F.Ti,^j'. ,.a=;~>. » e _7n-.'::L ti:, :`.`'yi, y, ~ AC i s : En sa: .Y•:, i #4~ ~,~tx<:sJ~'"j'^ ''<'9t >r L F ~.~~<J'~..~-'~ e,,d{~b o;i^ v'Gl:~'f-~:~<.< ~Y'e%' f.:'•i,;, i<1-rv^=:-, "v Af~.. -','4`-'='':-' . fby ,i E}'_ f.l-t f~2>a sn, k,si ~z `E Ui s'~ _ ,p•SV'`§. E-,~ e .~.;°s`,'~a->'^y , : ..-~at :..I ,-as^~.' ~ ~ r,~. '~•ii,,rE , s'=,~~~w" eY~`s" y ..R't 5...^j.4 i s.'-xS e . 'R'l~'t':- `:~w -'',.5.^~ ..f `Y-..-, i~'~~ ":t ,~~yh.erxi..:,~-:',K,: 'in.i.',v ,S,d.:..~~~.•:~.»:..suux~....E.~~4A`' -:2,.~, , ~ ;,2r:<; ~=s'.;` r i;,.'Yy s~ _s _~'w ~ `"jam F. ;:La:;#~: `~x:g ~';':t<:•'a F' :.1 E _ ~ , _ ~'..~«^i]~`~xn f=v,z :4~'+, ~~'~~,\!!A ~ l-~.t~ *'FA,''t~ Y~l. ,t; Coen;~rac~t~ors-:r~ ~y . ,'l 'ip~->,n<'• tl`i?.}b:%ir.`,Y~ .FRF. -Con,tr share ..;x ya qtr' r ofe~Ha' Lake:; F X§ ; gg. hey:: :r. ' a;J-An '.?,r•,:5 4x't; 4~1"' "7`"'.5., :tt';:'-°>`yajt:s. .r:' ~,iV ✓+~:.,Tuata#in° Palle: "r`i` at o strict _-~:54 5:~ m` ,ys 5""` "NF, -`r-„ >"•."..c: ,<~~~r,r'„ =~z: :.::.cam .;q"y"~n~±~;'.}';?.~.. _ ~.7: :..g,:i..,...? ~ .as T£•>'=, ti,;"w t:rf.:^';~~; ..;s_..~r<~M'7.o-.,._ s:u . ,~.%;Clean WateirWS.er lces,-,.249 ::/o r:=f ~<ww. 'rit y: . x "a,~ _ .;r,<i :~.fa`~> Y,.. y~:xiC +.t y, : F- >a'''_'"-=<,-': ;;E„~?='S.`i•~~~"~~='~-' y` ,t,,"• s•;.t ,'.t'q':~:,jg; <.f9:. ..;r.: F;'%y", Fs':,., µ'.&`t&,,:; e'tFa`.- ~P: ..fir:>A'4-'='.:.-,-,.-,A•{.~, `.<r;~t?,t ".sn:~. `a' vomic <af Fores __ri'Fr. aw .~:f.bu _ tY ."i% j...a,t<•<.',~-'=d<:-:::.~',?: ~°l~` v.~ Ci ofBea:.er#o y: _.-"t-~ rs4'<~...- " ;":i~~ 1:~r•'i`<: F:r °Lake:~(Jswego.,Corpora#on~rv=30:7;r•1o5 WasFtiiin`g#ohiuCoun Faciiitibtl TBD,-Cd 3 tf" Haow-':.iudh does rit --lb, -0011, st It tr4deas.:~tti.- Thewxbasis,-bt- aluatio ' n:: is tnet ;prese,nt .va l ue -of: tW!.fevenup-lo:be received bV' fe'd.erat= - ,~f. .:1 s a• } . "4Ra-,F j?.:, e ~ 2"~, ~k.. ~ tl..:.~:'. ~rf "r • ~ ~ .~,4 .F,'y'' `4 ~ 5:~•S:'9,iPi,".%v s'r~° i,.:yy r'! ti.i , Y<::<b,~ '?k'~n?, - Governiment:fr='tihe:h,fep'.o`;thJei_PrQ ect.., -n. =+~-A•e-.. J.;;aI^.f g F, +t3ft e9, s ` -i .;his :``°'4 l Valuationaof:ah'e Prt%'ectacraities; i• v i~.r: _ y.~d Y.s" '.i - b'+•£.s :,cis :-%~`,K .~'s "~:Y~~ `~i :_{r: ✓ Prel.iirina ;Value;:Estimate,ran eke s38`to g:: a.s, :=+'f's> .N :i, §f:.`"~"~. t•T :dy:n, Y,'f'si•: t t, c'l, ",i, 71 n`:nde ` endin on,ineotiafions .i#y;af tha fu#ir~';etleralrevri%~a:s'.' remaininfT° ro edconstruction char`es '.loans _ ,u SC ri`~i, , FS.: +F-~ ~ I~ ',f,:•<." ~£t,.~R "§.'Sf %4,`i~:?,,s ,~=rg,~water:.services.~contrac,,tsE~an:d=~aid;;~#orri"{(.~~"ation~ BPA~~~'~~}` ;s,`. n,> -<...<Itt'~' ~ - . > .;',e, ~ ~ sa t f l's~~i = : 4'`I' `y''4. s.y ~ ' ~ - ~a~,i ~ .T,: ~.,,$f h•,.§:-? i Y'• 'x:- ~y~ . ~~.~r' ~tr., {,»,T, ? :4 .G ^;44"7- r"<K 'iRe;. ,31 ,~>ri~~'.d'~v. 'yr•, ~..'z~::~, =~s:-. ~':.-rig'=„ f`c:xr'r``~~e~sf~ ~'..'Y'§'•fs,y.-." ~ ..h<s _.v?rr;;` .:fM".,.., r><.,. •:f {i•, i., . =;:3`'•,Si., {k s i!iN „f:,. ..r , hS;W.. °.:s"3iT~w"5 ;:y,,vy • t'.~q _ ks'7 c.,,:6?. '•1,r .:'v -~<`E,:. '•~',,,',,f.+;~..` k; t<.tt':: -s:;,.r~e'~": - R~Y;q.ixc,.;: ui~: ,..e;:.: ~4' `z ei., 3:?~:. S;`;«., •4<~'~ -;?'E,., • ~ h: - , <:$eA :~X ~F O~ ''ii -S' £1' Y2. '.>"aCAp-`-, rc= -i,.Vp. • ; g: czYg3<T t1r~T:a°isfer Rrar ~~w.M11ct-~ ~_,:t»~ i'~:~'~~•.,r: ~~t,;-r .=F£, „~~y'•,:.;;~'....,,'~~e~: _ :.,_xf: a .CFi `xx., =i'i :aY.''' ->:Y S.?s. - tn'Y. z••~;''x {,5:i'-',-it;6+"t i.$z-izs~''j~i:'>:(.M'i :,En- izi,=e~~" '',I;+n.:-•' ^o ctsa~mka1.,o'n'-Prep cess~: ° _ _ rz_§.~;.: ~;y ;•-:r.' !MO A. .r~.~,i< :5;..: a.>,; .ft~~?7 ~ ~ ~'is;, c•. 4 w, .t, me.ludrn: h• .%'s_~,` m~;~,~~•;;t>«.~~>.:<.:- ^..t.~,',;."a', s',3.,, 4sv;- k -x NEPA : Environmenta$ eF oview. -a- Fcilties ;Candtio.in;As`s:ss ;na k- ;'a:~,;, '4: »l5'~; -II£j. ~m',.`~-~.9%~y;'~fi,,:.,.3-ti?~•a, xGon/u~ressoiial{Aiutt'crzatron. ,',t£:' t . rh. ~i'.iyi.': .~.§,n'~.~ - _ y~,~q,~st .x?) S,'t~ F•~~'.>s <+Ri~ ih:kiz`✓".~-••'_~~"''~?-_'~_'~,`'S-„a '.4 'Yx , ~'.'Yi, ::Z ~s, ::,;t~--~c-?;, ':.ca3< :-.enx.•;, -~b,y - xYt"~"t',,~: x~~~?,s~+: •~:i~'F~'>~~,`~',i<., tt,,,,ry-,°'€z,.,;'';c .µisf'.f.}.' :,';7~'.;t~}. S' iN •'1.1'JC ':'SaB. 3-;,.4 :.¢3.1N L~zY' t ~ $jy. ,~.~,.,)e,Fp: :Sr.; .:~u i5.;~§ .i .~1,%•,4 - , :'~K ' Si b~ r~~°'`..s zy 3e:Sr~, `4{,,< z~;•`~i S:;y'~~'':§.: t',. >~,~.t.., ~ '_E'~,>~: ~,a; :j~" •,::>;r:~;. _L„s.~,..i„-.fit '~iti~'„ ;'i'' k r ;Transferee =PartersF :.p'ro ; sx3=:., Reso #i: iu orrtd ` rcceedbw~th' races-'< % h..FSI±~ `?;:h: ;:L,,sw •_w' - '.§-i"•`§s?:.,,w~~+',~r,~:. ,"-,:'"m~c:`='f'-~•°~ :>wr:••«..P' :F• %1 ~;~;.tb*.:~ - „G v _ ance,~SfruCtgr =e: ern ,.bev .eiopmen#,- .S•S, ~'i'., t:x..i ~.s' ',sins" •:Z : 39,. ..f q,',. '•t;r ' . .1 :st-'~ . 7x:' ~ : -iii < ,y ; r =`..at`' ~ • . ..:>_"t:. ~.a ;'i;° ; a< 'ay .:'t. Vic. - y." 4 " al sRe. uirerents R-=;y ontractu F" , xamesrof.existin Reclamati.on9con. _.r.': t,n ,.i ws~i. '£E. _ .<R*z„ ter''. , i_',:: •:-£'O.Fi':.::,~: TVID` "O <erat ons and'Mainten nce'° O&M of tf'e :p. ~'Daariri,:0utleWar s:an~d.Reclarr`a#:on `Znes~_-. :'VI%sh"in "to'n Coun; Fa'c~I t es'=:-O&M of Ha' „"qua°i~`5i = ~,q.,:•tt -,t • e Rec eationFac l# es~and~landm'ana ement,s~.: rm :Corpse'` =.=r w y o ,A f.FE;ngrne:ers -,Ff'oodj'Management.: r - _ aE3'•.. F:,:,~:~,. tri... r;l'r., va~... Tuatati.n_a;Rier , `~.atershed6 c. M Miti`~ a#_ iono,r 3 -7 7 1- exis r ~y .a= ilk fi ^O{!e it E»s W-+:=-si'''.~ s'., '.1;'^:":~ {'.~'asM ~ r 54 R''P ;~;r~'~:..:...,',~rr~, E~ r;s`,:.i~ '-.x.;~::` r ~'*r`... • tt :.lY.-s S'Z `.,~'u^:i':' ,b: .:E;3 -Fv„ y.~=~"•'- gam. 'S. _ •n_-{°' v.i~'.`` ::i: „'1;<i,:r '~f':x: %<,.^~ki '•ty';'Ly. ,..,,.s.-•+\'",i ~^f'1'S•'C'~i\ s. O:th~er:t-Wate Servi~e;cotracts°~::.~ :.<s~~~=~ • sk'P"t_. K:'~~• yvwf.ya ir';,~',:aW~F: s.yf'.z ::j: ~;'~a-"~~~.;f ~-,°lo•. <3:=` i'S~,: a•"':>'r: •:.f",::.a:,, -4.~rp,. '.E'.=S.ra'`{'~ .,.+„3•~•"l~' ~ .i✓,i<.:-:?~~ =:s'`.'„' '~rx rx,t''m; :~q -~,ru< ,<.a .I;' .t.,'~,'7<b ,±"^t~' ',ST: j~..`~A:~, FF Y'`~='1y .`iz~•"E~3,s,:.. .:i,..••cr~~~~a<. „i~• Y•, ,:~`,Y.i ,S ,Fy."k„~` :,{t." av'k's.t•.} .s:f.: i.f Z.l:, :'a:& ;rl`n., ,~:F,~{,;+< ;n;.'.?`i:%.r fir'" - ' ,~.'~:'=.4~,y ~;;,.<.,;;:,'.:.,;'•~,~Y>~,~' i`,;:.za..":_l::».;::a:~ ..x~~:.~:i;~.C.:~ ~.,.:2ct:~, '='s:_...«,:,..____ ~`',,:_;:.:~_~`"•-¢'=s'. e7~~:_'_si_,:a 'S`'i'~ a .>nik ' e-I s, -T "C° :'4:'~`~~?4v~=,~j, x,ft, y,~;+: .:w~,'z_,~.~{,?~;^.. ••'c',:Sy=: •'~.?",x_~:1,;- `:;g="~,~'''axr_.:t; y<'a;s~ t ~'•'s. F,:#;. , 6'~ 's f ' - ~-,rs'.•:.:< pb p y 3s 'h t. air r 47 a _ S,F•'J<.a°': s=';;i . •~s£f'»~a;.; -.."3:.A'i„••»'Se.; !'A~°. 'fi~a '~`a4~~~'+`~'`f'4:.:,1,k.:::'.>r.::.%°t;~::i,;•~:y~>~s~•''"`_ z S :v 'i•v'_ oncrueren r€o ect P<r,:" /`fix: , =..L.y --y^3- ':Fs .4: - V,sG -'r-"-a Fal 4 6.. d~_=`:e !`•R,,, 4 k..T IV F.«u,Y ••~"swr's;.''> y?, ~,°.a, ;4`s -•E~ ,'f].;w ~ '.:,r,., ,i s..~7,'°,~~'a~• ~S'' r,i ,:~<',,~;.rs _ tr':n$`~i.~. .x~ ~.:F.; ';a v. a`.r.'Y=~.` "~.z .f- . a k . L X <s..ai `.>s.,. Y: x•,ar aft..':":d`it•_~7^ ".a< . n Water:Supp y:lPro,/ect confiriuesrc forwa'rdSY o. a 'L "M .v,ilk:° .f„. f:- M~,2,'.'i'.: :;r {','=t, 3'•: .y/:" .,~>{-ran^k. {kr{;.:3~hF'"- ~a >i:.. x.14,' ;,n ,a ~4- ekScog` nss'Dam,. xpansion<n f~~{;5 •'a{' •J.V" -A. . ,.I s{gn"r:,~=' ••e'vd~~ kt', H.. ~,~'.(Si' 'j F,.?t 4r fd.: ' 3?~t; a~~ r. ~E•,~.f:'~~'L w. .<.t.,,.. „ Environmental=lmPact StafementPermittin t -•4'`'-' : 2'. ~ * ~y{.?4i;=,`"'.z*: i ; F~;:"-•.:: , ;..a '>:~`~(§;=,.~::~=°<t°: i._~ : ,~~%,~ny-~,.<,s:pa : ,s,, ..i'~ ;=Y:3~~': ';.ia '>ke:' v'.- ^,:C•, L`',`, e .a ',~~v_:s:~=°'.'. ,'"na~`.`;x'.. _:t.... ,~,IC';;e:, as .s~ ,sr+:,.'- tf Af `.5:' -..a 1•,L„~ ,5. p °al''•` Z'.` x._=s ,T,,,: La< ~ . YL _ ~'.Y,,F"'~ ' Vie. ~x_z aT 5` i16"' i.c=~sMw'~:1 n e1~..SyF,`{c xsCi,;v}',a^s•d"s,s-'.s .Sr', sfer=}=Pram Ke er»ents,1*%~;~a.:~j% {F Deaf+, _ :-ems, a,:;F.'"=a ~<:?<~,,,,. Je„° .s-_:.":•'£.:~4am„,•' ,.;k':=i .:k'?-yi-S ~e -:1.,+1.: •`~'~`-=L 3.s~- -~E~'y; „`•YE, ";°yi YES`, `Y;.ni`i a*•-,~,~', `;,'rd'j,:,', r'`F~:',sdsi.{'2'e,. ~x F::•e.•."..,<m ,.~>.c~:.:K~;', Curre'ntCperationsonl. as-:ESA:w:ftere , ;Y: "::f,,? »V:'..'?,~. .if .E:: >A{: t ':b;; '.,g'. K.'w, p E.' Fe. = '"i ,;,"~L •3.~fine "7. ~F+.", K:qy^ ~ 9 _ i ;~Y:; ,>ic"^,'r ,.-9 S`-'' ~ E b:i' A..£.1-F;,Se arafe Enviror rneht°Rb:t view PNroce t "~'{`a;3'~i~`,~~~'~`-•.Rr. iA7' w',2;' e~ f:-r; S~"': F„;'; 3a:~~`'. ~x'.3; k:?~"::" ;¢a ?3. l..Y , • . ~:i";'P.,._"-~C-;!"•ti rq: t-: . [ y-ie+(~,,", Shim: _➢~~~r ~'GoYer~nanc®~~4 Local,(-Processs.''~_~'~::.... - x;4 .he„E„ ~'4•a`dr,' ,k:~,e '.k:%,-°':3'x.~'. ,~;.~:,E'<:" <iS:.:.: ;R:,.: i;: e7:jl+~,a my 3:: - •~n::.. er'Y£.','§,°~.. .:b`>:' -d~v~ro: +.i?, E `c f. Ti.•: `r.^, •re+~". ~G'n';s s:' !y x•' : z, ......;r' .;G„ ~z,'.•c":s.:F•",' zi':,'3'a ;.=L"s'. „~~.`,'`~`,~r„.?',:F: °➢=e:Fa'cilitiesr_Conditi.onsF~Assessment:~~::',;~•.`:~~::=-3s:sv'~;.;g~~a;,_;;_~..~, ~q% :.4;?~ =k' E, y'.a+z"v': ,i r:: •r.. ? ~'2"•:"~v «i:,,.l 5 r 3 Schedule°for'T,~-t1e Tran f ^L' " u 5• sr.Rec:Iamat~on ::Track F ! Title Transfer ~MOA;;,; April -20'07=i ; fi~1g~, r' FEn~ironmental RMOW r :Mar. 2'0:07.1=`Mar :E:2008 3 5 :a3ti:"'t,,.~ _1,~'~' :i~'* '•F,:,..' ~ . "r";"; ":.:r~.vd"',a`~~`"a= {.Cone//M~~ress:io'ralAuthorization : Novembe20:08Y^:; 8. ? ,3t::.,,.'-,i :i'.htil? .r _ i,'4ync:;`v?:it> f,t ~.yE94W:S Y.Si ,•F,f..a ",,i }s4tF''~R`":k: if. v'i.-'..$`5'' ' e~ti';, a;C"`S'. 'rs': "~":'~';.F',s ~<J''•z•fn~<;,,{wr .xy.;"' - As"... ..w~v,,.rv =r^+j ~.l.,°°~" u..fi:i. ~~<.•e'-~'=i.4a°= 74t';'i;,,:,~;As: -n :'bi,•.: - s~a ;",~b,<!i5:,, •~rr_, ~,:i sF,::~Y/~,;r :,r.E''~`,°t.?i<~:~::Y~si ;~~i .C.,,~. ~:•~'.~i' ~ ~ :~'ns.'„-:":s .,.:!s,C:r:'.»~ ~:'r: 1 a c~e_,~`"ti.'s"~.>,~s..;~ . ~„,F.''.,••,- ."~3:E,,~•,'ai;,'€.k,_::,E~i~:: ~u e'-: • 9. e1F's r ;P:: ixs,; -iY, • t'~ ~ %.-t{m*'~;~ : ~ .G'h=+.,~.'°~ .qa -'4ik. >I.. %;.~..~j:'_<~.. - ~?:...ia `F'' _~-v, tS~ax''a~;~'LF, •-'iYV dvr~.;„ s4, Transfe.re.e.: =P`a-rtne Tr h' •,::."..'r"d.y:_';F:-':.E ''~r .`.:~,:f,' ,°y..a$,y :"KN%-~'f~.%,y ~,,'v;,,,;E::y~~,, .:..s~,-,, .e,µ ,k,~.~,.,•{ i,`.,:. ..g~..-."'~`r.,"'~ :'i:6;h.~;~::P, . - t~':T,3~,',- :,``-.d~'~'; rg4, r^3,a m r=n,: ' i>r•~..?:;;~ s ' e=~ F«'~.'~ ~.ro~... }~•=`:`;fi . ~'.`s ~ "f - w,.' .,9_ ,_~K. ';xY".y:.~:.;~p~''; .~sa w.`c.`E:.}`€,'~;`t-..~~sa;ts-d'~s.'.;~e: ,S~~*.~'~•,~1'a~.' ~=3s:.: _ arri,,~~-.}?:"r~r:. ',.~€r€. .~,r ys~ rL,'3: - ..r -'k -',:Ti#IeTransferARsolutl W A, {ate>G 'uerna ;`:cegAgreerne t. , N a'rck 20:0, <."Y-<:4 s,; r,,.,;~,:: „a., >,a.,J r•f{{- ~(a ~s~5 { F f ~5 F': $ H;-•~,: hF~c a ,,~,s, Rc, ' x h - > F 8& ~,p sh1 ~PUbI1c:.FteYiew Process ~ Febrruarj%'-20~7 -:~b;r own w,~.w,r<=•€u ,^r,3';3v`-- 3. .Fyi~ a<,: .F'F~~" F i .a? ~,i.s a'€z<.»,,,'~{;°,€. ~ ::L:,r:,"€ ';r~ ~4 -:fit'^:, '•1 A ,.'s~~<:`• `""~.E:y~;:. ?~~,".~~~,.':c-w r~.~ >,_;~a,-;d1=A >..~`i",s : _ - "'+i',~:"-r=': 4d.<.r, r:.,~. `in},~:' >-_ata„ F-n+., :;<t,.a:`~ r_--- 's`-. .:~•.x,-t ~f z, n,~y ri •;,I"~ <,€.Yy` ~:r~ '{lia Si'P-,<:{;::.3i;•.;< "-.:,•j,.F , v e .i , , a.wzi:~.::Jr:.'str~.`"W [6 ~ ~,y.e..,:::<?`-.: _a3 •!,F . a 2 p~1/R~ 5rz,,, rz, .,~'>"ti=: 't V=H: h ~,?t: i:,Y,.. t:' > wM',+i, d b ~ ~ { ,F ) g~ pT<C"<s '~nr i°Y S'i'niw;! 5.,ct~ -.r', ~:5;<,.F= ~.~e-%~' "'~E S. 7 •.E;i"°. ,~S.F :''~~•~P's.~"'s ~ .~:s'•,= ,:~:~~~.::.-><<s.,~.;~~~r~rS~ ~~d~efc►rM-~~..r vs.' ...•„rw .,..,3a ;,:tom r'r z:-=,._ n'r, .a:~'-i : -=,`''~`s T' y,-F-,'1``•,+-i s >6 r S G' <r+ e~ ,y„" Sa , xt ,~ri:'d:.,+.Y,, -e,t: =,y e n rvl,"y =;f ka € -4-'~~` "5;.'T.~:*}-a~a,~y ';t .'~~j,°•~.<;°' i,a9'i#x°eq . r r :slllia~ter •NS"u I `j., 3 :ILA :'pap...".' .MJ ,.r,~•,,:.. ' - =t.9•-a^i:~;"+;°..i;'; z~Ss'd,'v "'<`y,'~`~._,~,;'='`+,.3••'` ~'mT;,. ..x ~ F, t p.,, g..,n:,q+2.;., w~~d y,~, E,:.Q t4!... ~,~5;*•.:S: e? i ~i d'ri?h;; ,4i} e b<d,:` ~_•'~N~'~~`..Ew,„.~' _i~£'"" -.»Y.:.. z,'.{". 1;.% :y:kr,r?Y•E. i!a-q~sl-: •~`~'Jp4;,,.r T7~_'.':~/"i~`:: `rvi~?~x,,::::'~i'•- . i•.,Y<', ~,~'EE'-w: <€t ;ice +wo, s,, ~ja.~,,s. :z: i~ C_'J'4s:_ <~o: -dux - 9'P'i ~ t ,t5~.. ~~,~{y; d ~`a:s_{,+_ ' '_h E',S` f i4Y.-~``d.. F u, _,m g ;.a.. F ~yv'ii;z~ ~ ~ ,'?Y_i `;.'T,~`.. '~•-i§s eN. -"<'i-~ ~ Le'4a~, Z<-Z -f> _ Sd'i t?`. . oncurre'nt°w~, hz Process3u- e~ ran.sfer: N~-~ i Tit] ,a la ";i:~ ~..a- '•:~A~, -';n'V _ P"r-a ec Dea l-1 a 'u ne ;.RS5J3,;1A`b :E:•;',~: ~c,"s'ti 3'~s~.k~. ,~Yr;•, L>FSF' u.; _ <',~,~,-ter `.`ter ,3 k, >t, °~~Draft'?lannin : R • ~,:.>r g ~ ep~c,.rtlEl~ " as•-:.+'-:~ r s- "c i3s4~ ~;•tu~:. _ ,~,,.'=='j:r,i„p ~ s,,:d:,•• ^k~. sc k,4;~•t r ~.~-~.,:ks n.: s'~ J_ as~,~'p,a,~:~~ ,.mss,,... - ".zr~y- zE., ublicGomment,F.,:.:=,,, _ 7 K9,O da: J.une u" 20.0: ..G~`~..:,.-. xk ,,.,>.µ,r_7,~,`.;-. ro•et'a'$Y;y. r, /yy <:';;''.;c,~.:: ,c:. >r ;'>.~ai', kyffl, , .'j. ~ :4~ a' ~k'•`.Y_'. ~iJY'-: F?:e ~.S'J3~._1:: 4~~d,~~>:'.j~ . -~V'.<E.; ~ r'#~ EIS'=11Perm , fin ,J.. 4Dz > , Sep{, 324:07 °Ja ► ti2g03 ; -'_`S'yr .oYa `c:t .24s/,n ;yvag2v• :<k.v5+{:vn. %,:•~~:'p"..:.:w;v;:_ _ Trv _ -"L .;;.3=,': ,J_an;;20.Qw9~~. nJu e.•20.~1=0;_. =•=W;.+4^'4;,gt-?.: •<r7, >..4zt"~p'fi kk.:'£:,:; ;-7 r,!±'",,4"r: s'= „kr;„a;.:. .,.I -rye-''-'" ,•Fr :i;E ar~` -t~:",{3;°':ir a. ~k ;+a ~k„~, .L3v r3:'~+A,x:~`,g'='•~c-' I>... 3';w,r, .,'y:-e, - s;'d`: } Ear. Jiane3nzo, ;C=orstructi"O:r:: ~'F,'~:,!~w `.''a' :°>;;:_;a~_. <'€=s-{ te.2:s f• s,e;~;q"z' ,3., .E-:Q,s<'r' :'~r:. ~,'S,~tt :'''~'::>,".:G`a'k.~.',~ s?',~ ; '~.'s,.a, ...3• t'. :._F., a3~ ;;;,4i . ~y _ _o •,g~ress ana u# > o zatlo,.n:_;;•: IVI,archi20,09"~~: .7 ..E ~ E ~;t ' d ' t i :r.:~`:.: { t., _If : . ~ .>M "s <r: =i'4"~ i S': •.is-"1~.''. ~_=reecled•.::! y~<;~ ~ 3. 'i~~'.~4'Y :~d. r'rE~} i ,'„s'•':, : ''tic: •1,,, i;.1.4 - - ~;`._r,<; ' r"`~.'.+zsa.t~.:__ .:.:du;,~~«wv.~&x'.,....a.'s.~.` air~~.'''.a"'.^~' ..z:~.%`•".,.~'<:"s+-s~"z''e.`3~7~.-,s a;<...w:a:..~•»...-«:Lti~._......:,e:....:s.:..._?, 3d~a~;:>:..~.;:«.. 6 n,y "i:' ~ ! ~:°+fe Et:3:`I; r:•p \•'i"n{,Irs.' ✓,!'T`r: .'S,:, _ .{v ?„t WiAM .t f,r:, a:.,,,` . .,i •t; , -.I:.• J' nit tir.!' ~w `px;' ~-t~ ~ " .'?s Y'+ ~ -44 x'r td'~,+m~~/`~,r'I r; M`*n . , *tn s f w » 3 5"`ti +'t' 'S'^• .Y ^ '?:.,,;SB,.aRg{`~.n;, f;val x a .n{a u^M1~"` Xign,. t' fl .$'A"- t e 5. t a* an,~3'3~d +~gtSt, + ~ , h M ,G I - y ~ , x"~J ,G(j'YR}3~} ,R~Uty;<~'9Y c y, a,'>: 1' itt SS't k ctt: E; , .l f.`. .'S ° V z :°Aa, r:- ,Y' §0,3" ? 4#b. f"1' yv kj x F k,"s rAa$y:+, 'mdmfl.`i. t t r VXY: '~ov':: Y' x' e • ° , a k >S: 16 •i' 'r~' i, to , , Noun! S! u.t=,.;:. L 1._Lt:, . .::c i .t L t r: „ =,.,tt it .=r,.1 ' ~ ....q , F :n , .•,R m .ea ~.4i,' ; a z::..~ .a±,~` +k: t' ~`8.?{.n ' . a,. `r. t 'o;-d*µ~i"h~: p~.F..~. ia.......,~a"~.. :m',f f. u'... n.. .a ..J •~t~`.,;i^R - S=.>;, t., „i. 'arT ":i-:he :a:, n~`^,&~ v:`.'am'it ~:S i':;:. G.•`.- '.n:'s""' ±,,~sii: ~d;~t`.i'~"~~'t"3'$.~,~2't $ '~~~a~~'.$~s.,f:_~','t • 1<,._.t;k;ol.t% nit! :?=7:t;;te1•. a; J:tc, _-_&=k:: $-:st..'Ni';;S IM""..~":L"..",. lii:' 2/O,p .LM, In M "n 3,, t....,{, t; t.'t HEr:,`. i i:SiiL W SAM, W t ='S ~{~,s=<n: 6t, -k. QC ~ ill,}'{;t, "t,f "S h kS".<U, die Nor, M01 ,:il' t'tt'= ,(?iltt:;::i E,itl3,7 ivic IC"x'S +s+i'.' as i t~ r, S plot, on ley dl.. , "l4. t.'`'' u ? 0% f -1C., s e C:+~~ 03 Mt::E:fl Zhu NYC }t..;y' [ t't tin t1.+._' i€,', f'-;1:J n,.;.. ,•'1i,! %i li i.,.•n is ~%`.ffr d{i }~i i. t: }tG LL:L%tRtiR~,€.t LS, i~. tt' , ,,_E 'z "M w f,: t..4 ~i ..'il ..•r-.:l,i-f }-;n it it' 1 l-,} ..^1W :Ott. A, in , , 4W Daw Mira virld-, Water fdoei:,=e F9 as $ ~ i2 Bb Q: [lam Ic\ via! kg%'.., ml'n s. a ecii .,a s x r Li.w414'`. , ob- afg 75 r R „*f:°.l tt in &Q-001" Lake Fc,pC, .,ft+.L+i t= r F is , F • ' s}; ',:3 !t' Ttsj)-, ^I , ,fi,. ~.r iii i, fE"„ st.t t::s •t` ' ~ .,,n •n i4ymd. '"x.1RhH',+ 9° 25 opm Raisllk Mill . - ~ ;,f ,t::,=• t„=},F , INatac? yaest=*a i'u.nback : t: Xt",:iRStirl II7 ~ti:itA?iti*F'fe x.!Y JE.'i PT ..;i:;., fEtr'es Vr3Ea'- T~gt:sYagrt# t 1ec}rAVater 'Se vicess "7M v `"*'.x rl:':. -..W....«.m"........... ....................ter...... p .i , 3 LEGEND S w v 2f - „aat,:. "m;t4<.• ..ea:: YS>=[-, S J!f,`to=r=e!=» V;>'x: # Axv .t,::.a4 • !n=. n"Jla:a•' 4'.~:.:_,: r tc„y:,::sn f?:s,;;.- ri,x„:aa-a`r, `.".t :t,..a:f YYre,,. v.st.:u,,: '3.:':t,: 4iM, Ivy S Y a ( - i N, KIV K, 10A . i,.d Taf t. AN - :y , ,.S 1c t: t y<y1 °isr x r = .v cr 4 1` - con ~ 10R, ;,t 1,01 NEW .:i.-:i Clan VAUS, iVEN Ch of i.,, ob'.r w Wwwas" f`•S,.~F Y r. e y y r gv Y ~ ~'0x.,..... .(~=.ak^„,!:G>w ~ '+aS.,~'T'•'x„TM$'.:~..,5±. :,}„~.i".~,,. ~„g"':Y~ti_ y .,.r v., e fi`.j;a`il „.;•rie'S:;~"dut:,+fr' w:a ."ry.:. h,,,, h', &~;yry"h i& m ; a : , .u ~'d✓ rc iJ '.i.%'fFSr: L,{ "?S aT} ~r^'i 4!= i. . ,J u An r v' " V-n e w .lp~ . «P •t r• w.,r, f y v ;,.,'t' 4 no }.'Q i {11 ~I,;v uaw ~r* \ Po. t t ^ y t x 4 n I irE .4x 1}a. X. h . :i . ,.s t tti IL 3t t, L , d w " } 'c 10, #a3@ 200 gsHn 2043 seater E3E Winter 006 Winter 007 Winter C~ 0 qt ° $ to to tea to to to a' b.- f y Spdny 2004 inter 006 Winter 2007 inter 2007 c Winter 2009 Summer 2012 Water Supply Prepare Rnal Permitting Final Desion Construction FelaSibility Study MDES Environmental 16 FS) Statement (FES) (IRS r l f, , y:l, r o IM4I.. 41- 1'::. 1 - } ii t M, "'MwwYro.:d 2. 4m»'. v1n.y ,L.„pse•,; t, 'a„ k x° xnY. All WppaX 9:At~-, . a ,.Ad r» ma k ,~n n ,ryu w '3 ~r^# x" 3u ,tPv Z nw" 3°^ 'yMMg ~ a ifv "k F Ye0 yA +4vS SY~.._.~, rev t•~ v 1tgA' ~ e'9n- 410 THIRD AMENDMENT TO JOINT FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR IWRM WATER SUPPLY FEASIBILITY STUDY (AKA, AS TUALATIN BASIN WATER SUPPLY PROJECT) This Amendment, dated , 2007 is between Clean Water Services (District), formerly known as Unified Sewerage Agency, a county service district formed by authority of ORS 451, the Tualatin Valley Water District, a domestic water district formed by authority of ORS 264 and the cities of Hillsboro, Beaverton, Forest Grove and Tigard, all municipal corporations of the State of Oregon (Partners) and amends the parties' Joint Funding Agreement - IWRM Water Supply Feasibility Study dated June 20, 2001 as amended by the First Amendment dated November 14, 2002, and the Second Amendment dated December 4, 2003 (collectively, JFA). RECITALS 1. The Partners previously entered into the JFA under which the Partners agreed to jointly fund a study of the feasibility of alternative approaches to increase the water supply and evaluate the "no action alternative." 2. The Partners now wish to amend the JFA to fund additional tasks to complete the Tualatin Basin Water Supply Project Draft Planning'Report/ Environmental Impact Statement, and Title Transfer Project (collectively, Project). The Water Supply Feasibility Study was completed in March 2004. 3. The Partners also wish to amend the JFA to address the acquisition and disposition of Project assets upon termination of the JFA or termination of any Partner's participation in the JFA secured during the development of the Project. TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Section 2 of the JFA is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 112. Cost Share Each party's share of the cost of the Project shall be proportional to the party's projected share of the additional water supply as of the date of this agreement, assuming 50,600 acre-feet of additional supply. The cost share for each party shall be equal to the percentage indicated in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein." 2. Pursuant to Section 4 of the JFA, the cities of Cornelius, Banks, North Plains, Sherwood and Tualatin voluntarily terminated their rights and obligations under the JFA. Other Partners have assumed their rights and obligations as identified in Exhibit B. Page 1 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project Version updated - 5-8-0 3. From the effective date of this Amendment, each Partner shall compensate District for its share of the cost of the Project as provided in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein. A revised payment schedule with reallocation of each Partner's share is included in Exhibit B. Total payment to District for compensation for services provided during fiscal year 2007-2008 shall not exceed $1.33 million. 4. The first sentence of Section 4 of the JFA is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: "Except as otherwise indicated in this Section, no party may terminate its rights and obligations under this Agreement until the Project is completed or a total of $5,797,400 has been expended, whichever occurs first." ' 5. Exhibit A of the JFA is hereby replaced with Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. 6. The previous Amendments to the JFA included funding for future real property purchases and other capital assets. 7. The purpose of this agreement is to enable the Partners to acquire real property, easements and other real property interests necessary for the Project (collectively, Property). The Partners grant District the authority to acquire Property necessary for the Project and to sign any documents on behalf of the Partners to purchase the Property. Any real property acquired shall be owned by the Partners as tenants in common. 8. Section 4 of the JFA established the conditions which must be met for any Partner to voluntarily terminate its rights and obligations. If any funding Partner terminates its rights and obligations under the JFA, it shall, upon the sale or transfer of any interest in the Project property, receive a share equal to the lesser of the following: a) the amount that the terminating Partner paid to purchase the Project property less that Partner's prorata share of all expenses incurred with respect to the Property including but not limited to costs of repairs, maintenance, debt service, all real and personal property taxes, governmental or other assessments levied against the Project property, title insurance premium, real estate commission, escrow fee, appraisal fee, recording fees and any other expenses incurred in connection with the sale or acquisition of the Project property (the foregoing expenses shall be referred to collectively as Expenses) or b) the amount of the terminating Partner's prorata share of the actual purchase price of the Project property less that Partner's prorata share of Expenses. The terminating Partner shall deliver to the nonterminating Partners a duly executed statutory warranty deed conveying the terminating Partner's interest in the Project property to the nonterminating Partners, or any other Partner that the nonterminating Partners may designate, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances except those existing as of the date such Partner terminated its interest in the JFA. 9. If the Project property is not sold or transferred within three years of the voluntary termination of any Partner, the nonterminating Partners shall purchase the terminating Partner's interest in the Project property in an amount equal to each nonterminating Partner's share as identified in the JFA. The nonterminating Partners shall have the Project property appraised and shall pay the terminating Partner the lesser of the following: a) the amount that the terminating Partner paid to purchase the Project property less that Partner's prorata share of all expenses incurred with respect Page 2 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project Version updated - 5-8-0-1 to the Property including but not limited to costs of repairs, maintenance, debt service, all real and personal property taxes, governmental or other assessments levied against the Project property and the prorata share of the appraisal fee (collectively, Costs) or b) the amount of the terminating Partner's prorata share of the actual appraised value of the Project property less that Partner's prorata share of Costs. The terminating Partner shall deliver to the nonterminating Partners a duly executed statutory warranty deed conveying the terminating Partner's interest in the Project property to the nonterminating Partners, or any other Partner that the nonterminating Partners may designate, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances except those existing as of the date such Partner terminated its interest in the JFA. 10. If the Partners decide to terminate the JFA, they shall have the Project property appraised and list it for sale. Each Partner shall receive its prorata share of the actual purchase price of the Project property less such Partner's prorata share of Expenses. No terminating Partner shall be reimbursed for any other Project costs incurred before termination. 11. This Amendment shall be effective upon signing of all parties. 12. Except as amended herein, the JFA shall remain in full force and effect. The above is hereby agreed to by the Partners and executed by the duly authorized representatives below: CLEAN WATER SERVICES APPROVED AS TO FORM By: District General Counsel Date: TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Attorney Date: CITY OF HILLSBORO APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Attorney Date: Page 3 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project version updated - 5-8-0i CITY OF BEAVERTON APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Attorney Date: CITY OF FOREST GROVE APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Attorney Date: CITY OF TIGARD APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Attorney Date: Page 4 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project Version updated-.'-8-8=0i Exhibit A SCOPE OF WORK AND PROJECT ELEMENTS T UALA TIN BASIN WA TER S UPPL Y PR OJECT The following is a review of the various phases and project elements: Water Supply Project - Completion of Draft Planning Report/Environmental Impact Statement (PR/DEIS) 1. Complete Draft PR/EIS for public review and distribution. 2. Coordinate with Bureau of Reclamation on existing operations ESA consultation. 3. Prepare Biological Assessment and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act reports for Water Supply Project consultations. Title Transfer Project - Draft Environmental Assessment Review (EA) for Title Transfer Process 1. Develop Draft EA for Title Transfer Additional Combined Projects Elements The following are additional Project elements handled with separate contracts or agreements: 1. Governmental and Public Affairs - Consultant contracts to continue efforts to secure federal funding assistance, and community support at local, regional and national levels. Additional resources will be developed based on a comprehensive public affairs strategy. 2. Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Pacific Northwest Regional Office and Technical and Engineering Services a. Comprehensive Facilities Review - Inspect and assess condition of Reclamation Facilities. Develop the recommended improvements and cost estimates for the improvements. b. Biological Resources Coordination - Coordinate of existing operations consultation with EIS and permitting requirements. Determine environmental and associated mitigation elements, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife mitigation areas implementation. 3. Governance Structure Development and Contract Negotiations for Title Transfer Project a. Conduct a governance structure development process with local agencies to establish an organization(s) to accept the rights and responsibilities of the transferred Reclamation Facilities. A contractor will assist with development, negotiations and preparation of the various contractual and intergovernmental agreements with the Partners. The contractual elements will include operations, management and administration of the transferred facilities. Page 5 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project Version updated -'.-8-07 4. Land Survey and Easement investigation a. Conduct a land survey, title search and related real estate activities to determine the status of the Reclamation lands and interests for the potential title transfer project. These services may include surveying, appraisals, document research and environmental assessments for the various elements of the Title Transfer Project. Continued coordination with Reclamation Lands Resources staff on review of lands acquisition needs and requirements. 5. Clean Water Services Project Management - Continued project management and staff support for the Water Supply and Title Transfer Projects. 6. Miscellaneous expenses - The tasks and elements of the Project not currently provided for in the above listed items. Page 6 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project Version updated - 5-8-0' Tualatin Basin Water Supply Project and Tualatin Project Title Transfer Payment Schedule for Title Transfer and WSP Draft Environmental Impact Statement Phase For FY07-08 - WSP - JFA 3rd amendment Project Manager - Tom VanderPlaat Date 5/4/07 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT SCHEDULE (Based on reallocation and Percentage Share) Water % Share Total FY07-08 FY07-08 FY07-08 FY07-08 FY07-08 Allocations Costs Qtr1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan- Mar Apr-Jun Ac - ft MGD 100.0% 20.0% 30.0% 30.0% 20.0% 100.0% Water Quality Clean Water Service 9,320 25.3 17.62% $234,334 $46,867 $70,300 $70,300 $46,867 $234,334 M&1 City of Tigard 8,649 15.7 16.35% $217,445 $43,489 $65,234 $65,234 $43,489 $217,445 TVWD**** 23,091 41.8 43.65% $580,558 $116,112 $174,167 $174,167 $116,112 $580,558 City of Hillsboro 9,656 17.5 18.25% $242,770 $48,554 $72,831 $72,831 $48,554 $242,770 City of Beaverton 1,763, 3.2 3.33% $44,333 $8,867 $13,300 $13,300 $8,867 $44,333 City of Forest Grove 420 0.8 0.79% $10,560 $2,112 $3,168 $3,168 $2,112 $10,560 Total M&I 43,579 78.9 82.38% $1,095,666 $219,133 $328,700 $328,700 $219,133 $1,095,666 Sub Total 52,900 104.2 100.00% $1,330,000 $266,000 $399,000 $399,000 $266,000 $1,330,000 WQ(exisiting) 12,618 22.8 M&I (existing w/LOC) 14,000 25.3 *Inactive (Dead) Storage Irrigation 27,022 CWS demands based on 120 day season Fish and Wildlife M&I Demands based on 180 day season Recreation* 6,900 ****Note - Sherwood Shares transferred to TVWD (2000 af) Hydro power Flood Management Note: The Cities of North Plains, Cornelius and Banks elected not to sign the Joint Funding Agreement (JFA) - 2nd amendment. Total (active storage 106,540 Cities of North Plains and Cornelius shares were transferred to Total Storage 113,440 $1,330,000 City of Hillsboro City of Banks shares were allocated proportionally to all Partners under the Joint Funding Agreement - Second Amendment. Cities of Tualatin and Sherwood have decided not sign the JFA- 3rd amendment and their shares will be allocated to TVWD. The Worksheets will be reviewed following the release of the WSP draft PR/EIS c ;s`p'a= ''e:.' <:e =`?~~•'>~#.~~;~'~i.~~re;~.:~*~•''•:~?-`%:a=;~y~: `,is~`~>°~%: ~ •.~•:::~tr°~„~:.' ~,~rs ',.tea ~•••.~is'''.",.'~•;-~'_:',. "`'~,±:,'::~f"~a• <t k~ ~Gw.D~»'uH';.f,,.+-y~+.-A ~F~?a.~:z'~.v fir; P,~,$~ S•`` . w•wk P'•r"r ~ ~ a -ter Fit-- ~ .rc ~j.. .j`«x :t- - N~?o . v_E!:~'•• i ``t`.' «e-C Ys'Y(?• s t'" ...y;; <,'Y.:- >8:4s'sr. ^'~Y~W :y • .~Y..ar.. _ C t - ~ '~.a,,,•,,F . z ~.x.a • F,;: ~'z - z: t:',' :s": ".aa'. ,s, v ,..:rw.t;~»«.,:h= ::.:::i ~.,'^r," _i3,'.s>x"i•. - .s. - h`:'ry`f:.s ,a`rc.,. '''iii=~'~..,YV, ".7T3••;:'~.~,z.:.., _ _~="'F`'~44~h'i::~~.xs°3;.r ;yW.~.~..s- :e•'i~'1y~ 'i- :i =B:urea;u: of Re.,c anon' - ohnKeys Com mmssioneraJ ' ~ '.'s•s -i}'~,:;~;~~ ~'t"'..fig=. ."rx^, ' ~yg ' j III to#~~5:red - .4.:.:~a': c-•'.r::^:'~_t ~~;~~'y ?S f"'(`t`4. .'R.". ~Itriv iI`"-,'+!•;=;~.i('e S`~ ' aeirn•'' ti ;4'•; ;5:.g--`s rs':,=jSL'}{.r}} sb~C Js~ V , w .ate- Reclamation g,, ri.ri~.},_~t'; Y„ ..k ,•n ,;,,w,}r?rc}n, -•,i;~c. ar aka"~';a "~3 '"r.=t';:~4;~t}'.>., ~rik~tr~~;~~``~`,'•iv {;~•.w .a e. ' : r_, . Title•TraisfersPro ram.:.` '€'isa•€-.i`a,';A,°ai"s~' arks. Kia •:::b`a'::: -=<::i~i,,_` 'sg•;.> •:s~'r:a 3'r .<~s; r,e: too Cx:....C `•~,~•,y:,i=' L''s F , ...1= ~d, ^S - be , 2005:' i { F ?5h: .T ~3. i s:} ry _ rt ~V Ea. i te?R,., . r .e_ ....ate: 1 What "Is Title ="T r`ansf6r? A,ara°ns` idib n;that ch,anges`;tte`ownersh`rp= F~Vqi =df`fe r era l -.fa`cr r le to ;.,3`. •=,a',.• ZZ ,s gy'" y"'y^s':."i'S's-%,:Y '-".ts ~'~s'fi„F`„ 'IC3C:ala'et1 Itl~ rha ,y • Basic lly40 cal:' Ager c es= ; X ry would:bu}i the axis#ing h F jku; °Scag~ns~°C?am~~Ha ~ 'L'ake b :lraga!`rcrn,systerns~:~.7''~%Il~~ ~';x£ ' ~ ~ r, - ~:rrtc/udrr~g►':ad oiiirn ~;la~aisR ~ ; l°;~~:~ " ~ ' _ ' ~ anal'crtl%er:Reclarirat~an~= ~ t.:. ~'E;..;x,:.., ..,.~:<,..~:.:~,~ada.:~,:.W.:t:~':'3~mH ~::"'.;s,;-...~. ..,,.:~:ka.e.:='a, ,.an t«... -,..~:~.:~.xu¢W~."~"k<~'~•_ s ia:r .".i a w ~f: p s ~S tt d, f erir ,,F Ckv'ir, wF .i;:yE i, h:.~ f-E~,:G , -'<4 c :t='S• 'rte-~ ¢ s' s k '.l~ of E,'.; •5' a #I4:Transf_ ern: _ -.:i a i.5'3c•~ ~siT'~-,Y .no£'a=z:a%J-epY'- s:'y.~ Y6. . +de k'..,, Trainsfei~.,of federal.water.~ °hts anri~..r ts:-andt„easemQnts >t } era#ion-a °3- rid='Mait4nance res 'W1 'V h.. r- ✓t7tler,project:elements 2 Why: s,houid iocai agencies be lnteresi 1 -Local, ownership and control of fa c111t and water:,rignts woulpd,•reduce :decision- ma;krn r:'ca IIlex~ «and th',erefoire``, : s g p< tY. s~ -gym rove'':fle~c[b ~~t ::Ratential`of sav~n. s rpn~p~rschOil y 2: ._andt .°costs .f . , 4p,p 1y~P'ir'ect>foi~s< ^g" i'{:~.Qj'j ~"~/;~~.d ;t~/.t.{i~E "fig= _ ~,r~~.,,, *.+a?. ;1"' a. rat >-s N^f F~W:. s'%^.:vi „rD, •`.y;,F„ Y.a:•.i~sp.~ ' .•(n ~:f'% a'~5%~•sa af; c:.~. C,i. tiG,:?;~ d, ' : _ _ v. :fit.. < 5,f 116 c sti:r,~tNst 72 Pro: ec Conraicor C'ontra_ctorfad4: Share "3,•' fn ..4 ~ 4:'' .;'Y'}`p~.:; t ~r A 15 .s3a a•' `n W;~ 't;'.. . of Wa s La`ce` -✓tT.u.a.la t mV. SIN .~.,Jrri,gate "o: a^s eylg 4.on:7° .s':. r~.s ".:AF• z=4:.,.,- £ z: .r:.'a:?,..=_;s~:xs.;.'.:',~:i'';<"9•= Clean Water;S.ervices`_.249:: : Ci' f;of~F o: CI < : :anon ~ 7 f Lake Oswe o Co 4 rpor °lo' ty; Y WasFi~ir►gt4n Cou F Mies: - : 1hTBD' 3 t =f Haw mu'ch£ doest`. cast a: ~~o t MAO" r ~ ~t . . i• a; Y~ -'1 The:basis°`ofwal°uats 'net ~ reser t% aI' of y:•: t1 e: reuenyue to' be:'re"ceiv 'd 'W fede overnment for'tl e, Iif-6, fthe=R oect::;W:; y~ v3,V •.k, Y~,,.T ^.1:. _ .~i, a; •~i' ''•Et ~a;3'~`" .:}:~'s'•'°~' '•1:? a ; •'°a sr;ii•:-', S•L'i n.., .~§.,.i i•,nt<~. t. `§Y..": y` . Va;luat c on~of ahe:-;;Pro. et~Eacilitiev~-_~~ s :y.d ",-+a~ : y,:, x ^ Vi'i':"°,3: s.Y. A•7": ::,~,:y:'v' - ?sP'`w"Tts, . .3';% 'yf-,^.',k ~t'i'; ':3T .x-. i. :h 3~. sx°sx°.`~j.~i~' " ~u~+ v ~;'?r,`•.T^`>. rti:°_ r`.°i':.~'>k ~'':(~KS.: i<,; fl'4-~ :..x , .,5'-' 'sF.. fir, 3.. Pretiinna Value:Esf t'n , IA.:3..,:..; w•ry_ ate-range $fi:'38 .to,$11` 3M'y: s ~.i~:_ ..~,~a; i;>Y~,r >e ~a}; -t; 1 _ .~p'c .3".r~;y^ ^6,'y°~iM,§l, ..vS,•t arr ePending.,,,ompe9` ,ot ations?x[>;,~,.: ~,•9'r :ay:r1-.k. :x~rx-` ~.t`.~ r;,.,<-t•_.:A:'*':i: ~mRV =s~:== :„~•-,M:•„y... 't:•",q,i>:' ~':'A~..' ,;.'~•t",~;Y:a:..;,,'~r:.+'.,Mr%., '•;t(. '+.:'_^~„.'k,;',~~,~,'g4.,:>': •~~.t:.~~ ;'r ~!;r~~y •;>~.~'.,7't~.~>.'.`F a...s,,~,'.;;~:_~:::~. .,;.r•.:'.sr is i~jk"".r;T3 ='.~~':.:a. ~,a.:...=4- d_ =11A+min'r'i.~i►:i►f:4Ms:fe:its.rr'is`:_foeln'r~l'-re'le~ n:i'~ frnws: _ k: =`:s ":,y-r~ + " ~:<I. - <,~>,~J~r,,,,~..,• , r~ . n x, Kx 8v ; ~;~,o. 4r -t,~ 4 e ri:=3-rv .:'F~''< •E'' •.•.'4~'1`: ..~a._ T~1C ~i ~3; s:-r' ;?.Y" _ constructio'n charges~~ loans ~a-- n_,water''servicescontractss`nd aitl.=toarri - anon' :BP ~,~Y'NS ,:d't~k,, ~ ~;T'j'~ ~..-[s'~.,a'' ' ~~.r _ -'':s7 r.. ;tc' - ~°~wwv ~,'~e•~,~i` s S:..' >...n:?<~;.HY, .ir:' ..k,: Fa'¢ i'• „-e';., r ;3,.=' ',,p:._s.',,~F-, w "4^ ~.T: a.Z :l'•' 'sl'"~,Y:'y"e :.`F°S:-,tqq^ - ~k«I;~a~F: -.:,f, ',,ycN ^,£'fi~.`>?tq °y V. .ip• ~~~,1,<[. ;FS_~ 3g 2 i• Y."s - - ..T.;-..:'t'i s,.d'-q..--„L'' 3i° ~ c~ ..V'. (:'t ,"''9r:F~;:^` ~:~y ...iT,;..' -ax i?=:,:, !s;'s-„ - _ '.,.1-i m3s:'' ~i' ~£r ~t . - Y: i` 3is,'-; y', i wty • d :.,'~q, s. TEtIe:Tra fer'£Pro e_:c: t - _ _ :'a:_ n'„ ms=s ry Recl,din Ion Process : Y •;s: , .;e r'zs. ~ ;S ~"r, o: l;~~"~, t 4.s ;,;tc ,f ~ S;r. gp ig.. i_.: 1 :~.e,,, twct ~z.R~~i'`~i'':: ~'.x •i ~ xC•::;£ ~ . . r;JC MOA• including new valuation- ,NEPA~. Env'ironmental~Review ° - *;.~^~ti.,^~;i+~~r''`a"~..'.rn'`•t"~~'~s - ~ 1~'- ; ~ " ~£3.'~~~'3~=5 '4R. r:~ . ,F n: 'iI `Facilities``Conditons;ssessm`en"t: ` zCon ressonal=Author.izationa• SL;, .f E:>f5x,-'.:•f Yr,:a:.a..r.. .h %t "w4'F .-t;'T" 55,, r-t^_![.'`~.~s - rt'i'N.. - .x~', si<r `R ',f'' „i„ai •'~d:«! -j4'~ - ~,r:~ `,i 7' L Transfe:reeH YPartners :Process,tsz,'•''" s Wk N, ~ t ggtf.~,~~~ ~ ~ ■ Resolu_ t~,on'to~ proceetl with process ~ i~ Govern`ance.Strpeture, Develo 4 t Corn"ractu6 - Re urremen '`;Examp~:I,es':Of<existin9,Reclamatioon icontracts,:t~ ' TVID - Operatiohs'and`'Mant ' c enan O"&M o she. Dam;:Outlet=Wo'ks~and X : WO OCR ation'.Zonas-'r a ~Io ?2 Count a-'"Facilities:-``ra&M ,;of`'Ha ;w . Lakef Recreation Faciliteswa`nd land mana ` em 'n u ArrriyJC.or`s x_ p~, tof:Er~gneersys ;FfQod.Management' .4'.''>i s.a6::r .:N'.:ae• ;..""`t:. `,1.: ji c, t.` L: - - '~'S5~ .srl:. •.:i'{..i ~y3;.:i..:'`ic'tii' '"`£'.~'::~v' z..4. . 1~i,tysY-, ,'a'*t`a• ~ =`TuafatinxRirer;WatersFied;.Coun~cil~=~'Mt~ ~atio~n'for' y~ a, .!^.3 :3`y :^.:3+-l..:c~~l ,-t._ "'.~c~: °:1'.':'~'i: yi'~Y - i^~~1':a-- .~;~..-._.'iss::.u::~`.~..:~-i....-__.'_i'~+.•,.: :t~~> ~~:-;R~:'eXisrt~n 0~~7`"eca%ionso, is&" 3j ~F'~'rv,.4~"~'n fl'd' .E:."~ t '61= ~.K 't`3G 'F`'a' ~.:~:'3 ~^E% a-`~'~' , .,~z t k •ys~ ~ r: ,~e..3 Y'ry is~!i\"' 'r33f a` :.f4:..t Jv'{;•1.. _ cZ i',:"ya,'!~+ '-~y', ,'lea.,." a•i,._ ;',5.:.:=> '-s~i .:3~'~- `'r,t."a~"'r Other`~Wa'ter. Service contracts<z';~=~,, ~ _ its: -=1`lv-C .z 1:%'.: ..,tan ,,x :;:9'~• 'Jx.:.' .t ~;Y„S='~t- •,'(?%?.':°,~.''r4;i: ~;t><":~'':1x,- F, .'Vi'a:`=;t~";.. ~M, - '...~z;'~' aa !-liaa> '"3't;- `.$yy.`'•,'4'£e.; :.i _ r-,,r €.'E.' x69, -a.- 'rt6 _ f~'., too e. jh_; `43` `''a' 'a.~wi trS" Fs a,;`i-. ~ -i.N:c: .tit.. ,.4-.0, Y"' il:iY,'. } ,„^%.:t.:l. :1<q•~.r.,.~3`.E,.L_:~.''~ +'S+'1., :,•'r: fir- ?:,i•`.,. ~':iraf. ``.,,.•ltNw i'`~, r' , „v _w'` . ' s yy',+•Yr,,,,` * k'~.q. '.J'^` s'. .s, _ +li'i ~;~~nty °r:' L.`T.-~` Murre''°^"n ' on~ Pr ; t~ o ~e-c Pr~r - , c -'=R,'}.x vH:}A•~ _y-3: -~~.'k'^.•7 _ •.,z =`2:.x: r'.`~ €•y'-'..: ~.s. .,Wafer'E:Su %lm Pro% ect~;:corr#inues fori+varal Y = v ➢ Ex Ha Lakes "insM-11 ansion' °`t=J`y~ P`~~~:, :Environmentah nn p"act 5tatement~Permittin" g '"-',f%S: "n- :.°y`E~ .•a`' ;.k'i ~i.s~"f,°.tta v.: ^s:~~'~•-tS:c,:a . :~}r ~ ~;.y a, ~4$;..=,3 ?+.:•',~»}.r, .„t3, t.r~S~.Y'x_ny~ .ti - tiY ~w rk~ ;.'.t#i -i ~ ' .:yF ~T.. .~•a y. a'i2+:,,^,_ FW .a'r't ca'ia~t~ T tle Transfer Ke Vele ~F.: Mg. Pro ernents.~." :.a .a 'CL•; ,.._r%s - ,.!t'r."':-".-i rt;.'-' 3.: ~`.`a ;#~~,t'" .,~p .,,L •°(ws,,~'.%~_'~ e,;: m•^<' y... ~3t., ~r>~y. = ➢ COUddnt :OK `eratio,ris Y on1 -"as :is` - =where ~•~i. ~'.'~'•:an., :t <gz,~„~:; t•"~.£'=` Se ,agate=Env~ronmeint``Rev~ew.'Process sl `'x'f:: a-•~~;" ,~+.i,•,i` 3'"F', '~.a-a.::tca .•'sy: A:~'k>7r~.:;"F'~:~, '._€b; i~ ~+y~.'.~,, i-d,•'E..:' :F. ....g.., t, T'4i'.-: z,-nv'S~'>Scyi:;:s'~`~,.'v ,asr•:;.„L'x': ~,~c~ •~)•s-~. 3.,,.,.„x.t+, h... Fs, b„'i i„•;:c' ',SK t';_''`, d.•~,'i:::>3'~'.,`"" ~.~i -t : - ➢i ,Governance= ~cLocal<, Pro~c?ess,:'. i` ..yiµ i~Y!+: i"('. ``'w~.s.5.:..»«~'.,C L"~`a 3,.~ci1^•J.. .-~y7¢'t•" :~i^'. ,._i~]£.,,,~a+ ,JOE:"%w:E' sF~ ~ ~`4: - off:: -t'i':3, ( >~:3-.9~, <c.A.'„,t ~~+r •~~.f` ent'. o FacilitiesCoaditions.Assessm =:S>;*='1<s':''};:M .;s•` •:v.~a:a,'i~'^". :>rr. ,,.^=^!wi,,. ......>.a' ..'..'.:..au"ae:.w,:. "•',w,...a:,:....z:':. M`8..:u...,:&:....:at3a .:i,sw..:...,.:._....«..:.r xd_.,:.......'.z.a:.a.:,zLk.....:.:..H:,_... 5 Schedu`Ie :for Ti#I+eTransfer 'l m r n~-Tr -k -.Rec a afi o . ac, Title;.Transfer `MOA-1z April-2007 _ - - "'},a :~-.?`.-'^ur• '.'.t.~1C, v'A iF ~~2%:.~ K'~"e t3 ~"r";ts~'s z,_}~~...,~` '2008,' F : ':m g:20 s Ma'r>t;x CongressionalkAu:tlo Novem i:Ah Transfe.r'~e.e.~!(/=P-a~rtne:rs-?T'_rac'~ ~;kr„ ;';a •~:tc,.,:sn.:Y '6 .<<<,i `'t; ~;7'.' 55:'. n',~~_, i,•y <`',`k~'..✓~•_'*'~,ar":s;:s;.. ~,.,.:.~..~r a^ i''E F9'"=~. ',;rTrtlesTransfer'Resolutiorit=- _ arc 00; ;:i°;`.> ;_..c.~:.,>n`: Mk:..'..-s-xa-.a...`•=i . , . __£'a: ,n w.~-..:-<..:. , s. ~.;,13.'i.awa~^.+?~->.~"~. ":1:'. 7:.i5:io,N r~<..:...:': z a 1 , Goyeir,.nance`A, ~ q-,, m rit> Nlarcfi a2047r .kJu.: e:.2048 a_Y V~a'.:s ..tH';'~t.~=.u .tt,ja.-ifys:a;:: dx >'i",a`'✓'9dy e~:i N v•'Publi`c Re iew r P'ocess.` Febma ; '2007 =+on orn(~` rx'~„xv~• `::f:t4,af}rf'"= .'£o✓? fw< Hr"ti:'::, '.'.:",ii€ia:' t:£;°.`i; =t': ;d'ti;,'~%°,,°x_':.s>+`. ' sef"h,A,~A~,a. ~I'.'~--{;;~' :irr;' r'g.£;u•, y`.. au._✓t._ <:4" %~ti^; s,~'j~ =.:~,,.r~X T'a-:'i '^S ,..5.?rew^.s.F aH. <Y;, iyk., ` E C.ct;~., , a ,..-.~s,%. '.r, " °;,.4~3.<"I ';4,oy;_ , i . ,L =.z 4". ~'•',-ti'£>t _s,U,, . <~,x.,t,_.. _~P 't •g-" 'iT.f ~~CA aT'.'''~.:t.: wt., tE.-:^+.>n: ~~.:x.5".:✓ti -c~:v xfi, Q:b ..iT~_ -~;'ri.• x~. aj '=:'fr" _.;'~:c`;:.:_s ~a cy.p;. ,a„~.. ,¢,3,rti a~:~~, a_i: ,y c`. .,w N.', ,:4_i 'xt4 - y h.:4'e'.. e: ~t• _ ,:,C+,y,;,, i,i.,-1{ i ,^i.'` a=fo .~~"~.:t~ 'i .:::`"i _"y4,~~"€.w>3%r'C ~x•..+j::'E7 `;;`'a;n ,:E,':: ;'F`:r ,`c-'x~,,_-:_ .x a',i_ •~~?e],.g~-Y'_T=.r .'i,~'w~i_y - mf'~':c•, "-'„f^_ s~.c~r'-' ;r • _ ..t-i: W=tie:r ; S 1_ Pro ect ' PY lly,~.~ '4^we_¢,wn „a ,lk ..;y~G?;~w~„~,j - tfT : S , `<J€«v';si';"R_v,.v;:_.: rend , Con~curren:tr:wrth-Trtte`_Transfer Process::, 'Pro'>ect Deadine=une J ~'J`.,s '~:f f',-Pyt _ ra(:'.w;'.,s,"r - ow'.6'ySa{",•'..n 'E n' DtAft1 a°nnin - _ g RepotlE[5 Jne.20:Q7 _ ;r t'£B"> . 9:Q da' 'i?ublrc:.Comment'`,q-., June:;.°. A `,2007>< y;~ FinaYIS=P!ermiitingROD' f~200an:..24Q9K '.~z~._ ~ ~ •I`' ~"'.~`!d;i;sk~~2;t...~) v_ : ,s,,~A<x:^ri:. Desr n A' , 009 = une .20:'1=05a . L>«:-"g- ->~,c•r .5:~,. ";;x ,9r~,: :s ,:Cm'a{.d~„~:s '.'Construction Ju ll Yne;2Q0 June2015.f - .F{£`, aft. x„i'ry: b:k•-~„ i~,. `r: .t7, •:b•, ;ts t >r' ` Cott ressiona Authorrzatot, . Mar..cN~ -20.00; -3w W :y 9, •f<~ # Y 'r~~1``~ ~ ~~7 a~ ; < € C'N, it said, a ~c ncR, wGa. <,y. S« «..G wb. ..,4UdX ~AxvAa`r ~ f'~YHR:A 6 c : ° r yt .::a,:? ':'v ....n :.•Y • Vt. ~n'Th.••, .,t, t n. v: y, i:at .'.t. T 'c...:. . . .v ) x e -e, Y11 , r. ~u•,v m'A.}....< a"'~M1k '4.1 ,f.. ..n\\..x: ,ANia, '.T","'ii '.4i3,v, i',..'n i'R:%le. <i,:{'.' .::r..jt;i3 'v . : v o i.,.t . , t e % . , e , t. r,. a : r ..k,.. re. is _x .....e u F: . t Yf f.: ~J W~ ttA.1. VkYi~.t ♦k3,w,v.fk„t bl'~7::~~. ~?':"Y~R,„ 6t,M1$ t e, h?; Any9y vA ,{.'.nff' ..:n r,,:f, tl: ,+E..i.,i5''~ +,:t 3 F " ' ' `,tt; f s.;r i'do, 3 etr:'.1 Ss`. an a. b p r r 1~~ n•~+`")}r,{: ai.:.. 'at ,.g,s ~ q i'nPSr";a~~ty tt'`ii rl ''s ^e,",'`yx - C, `t.$ ya"{¢t"k"~s'} n•+'t'4iga4,3+trza''~xe~'!h"#'t~'y'!'~F {Yt"' ,Ia'c._t , M YS ta,..-'i I .'it'ttit •r .:a. ss,i e :jt! - ~ a$ i"a'^~"yP~",s3,PrSr"3%P'it",{`,+w.a"f+?. A~'Jw°' 11 •jql ,,7?' ~ Y x.e a t ~i „ r : n . ".q. t: ua... t ~:1 . ,t.., :.:.a - .i ':..n• s,q: /'s"`" 31, F. cr ~~.tC Ls ,a. tL. .,:r...): .>1~ .Ai,t -t L..:._ iPtc s: t;1vc="[i:'a r{i,.. "':➢'FtP4 ~ rjfip "'a :'°""'.~.X'i. k. .e.. n. y vg:l .~`:~Fki"'''m~,~s-: `.,._x'..: i,, ..n .,....':,w,4;::)t';'..r°,~; ~i:'.~.::,,q:;:~.%w~)'~ Yr6.ro,. rw.,. ...h;•is,v.,`I:o...P'aVi,:..:.$;;{y,...:..':R..".>uramn%'r:ai!,:ad'».~*s .'fi:: v.n ..i~x":Xi'..":.."r.n,...,'~ 1 3.t _tnu (u, afk;+ ,3 t it"t {'pt a: }t:. , Et'3! C+). M#'#i' u' f. ~"r x`"74: `.r.: that ~.ii!: $'S':3 «`+tr'S;'.` of ~`;''~=f" `rd'•Sa`~aR4::z:'."" x, ..'t ~.t+,~SvAh?.r 4""i`v`ii'.{3t.;, s fF{,';,..5='.E:.iiT- ,:Si5 t 11:.,tY,'"~ itt »-.-.,:,:.f d : 'i'i i ....`S: .,,,i.'.liA ic.;L a? t{ tli j~-., d,ff'1 t _ ~ rJ+,"f _C", ,l All is-k,t,, rtn Niii. i'Wi'. l thi 3 a"E',,.,"t tii"tF - 11, lrs:Esi!tsi %s:m fv [ • l W 1;a:d a `dolif` h% dw war O n% . .,aif lion", 3`f, i4 EY' rS MOM in t :t. c - t t -.f. t`#) .st"r' y, tx i ift. t> r ;r. to .'.'t:m. t !S. :L'+•it1:e .i'.:~5'ti'. th ,]Ee 1 stY F - e ..I ' , 001q P a'I _ , i ' t s', i 't lo, ".~titl if ' % i'pk,4py ~ 2 1 ~r., t 13 f ' , a isE♦ vk TIE , [ F }f`~a x t # i F i " Y Iri / ~ "wn in e # a i :3 L fi t : Iti: C 1, ti t it =i t'i t r C tr"a, 1 {x i,i-S t 4 E + ( f: r 1 € f ON ; t..t 7m W # Y.. , _f-lit :i,t , tt,:4 •i:i:;e f _'qjA c:t. x~, `a' .w•y,% :'s, V P ,6 "i+,'cW f'Ml n'V„<^ "vfX'x .».».~..✓'^~,a„ v. 4> Ram Ra3s aritl, iA & Sk stP ~i will j-thi&t 4s13Cojs t;`: Wwu pbeS[rie " 'i e~ Pitsxyp}.dCk can! ::?j;5 i'[ 53j5:ki ?IU~rTIf Tt__nw, &C Wic wed fS;. t' t'?t. t K q out, ~`r yp 4it ( f e LE,}.: 8..484 3 4. c a.(' 11. Ky, _ : , , FF ~tf•z':l:`€f~) ~t 1Y t."a {t; t• : yt 1 IM t jv,w1 Min `il, _ C:ait vt. .affil ttl{; n Arad n Ay F 411 .3 "Sti.,i ;i,:,s. 21 '47s'S3 §YnliC Stilj9i mi14Y t' ~ f W n AL , :`t' - r Vitat2r f`;prktrl#6't$er:p£».. "i t _0r.tit i. ce;'S nsxnn aE yydi>a:t, ,,.c, a~ i , tt.; 3+5 r ?°m. „ t R„+HY Yr3?sr ?:eeair#t9t.2 . 16, Qtiii't.,w .F r+ ro-ea; w Vii,'». ^ ~ " • c . _vle)T'y[ b' 4`L$~4"+9y, } .A 'y- q" C- Oman 8an w i , waraw Yr, { o ctif:r minx .r . uue,r. T, . n=,.. a _ - f'1'i:at "tpt+ iSt 'SL' V}!,4Sb s4dv'• , ~„"i✓". P;+['+'L;) t;,:.. ~f #p•ar::=.np ~3t~. st Six*.?._ ",a""aava?St_:,,.: f.r ry 7;e:n t SY xs. 7 0 W ~T- ii III, - - Y' >t•, 4 i, -IT ~'i.. V ~n•~}~a~k °a @y „,,,ice x r~ ~'%1'i'_. i - a A '..%rU~ ~ ~ Wks ~ r•%~rY. k , tw nn CIL n YZ+ w w^ x AY $ f rt. 4 n' Y ^tp+ , •v.t + _ ~ ~•.n'..~ a'd~HT ,v. M '.nl.~ t .:~'~h~•.+,~'y'k','~y~,~~."~»~~InPPMYY. .v`~."¢. 1Y I,f t a•fQ;'i2. L. y\ .,.~~,k a ~ Ti iI, " n Yews. ~ ~ ~ r . IT I~t ;'.t,i~, :44-t:•R'~•.,-.;!1 i4eit'.a iS .4 9~z c' Fall Spring $C~$s'n £I~$6 aaxt'~a 2006 8~'SLi?Y 2007 Winter $$09 to to to to ~ to to ITT r J ; Spring 004 inter 2006 Winter 2007 `inter 007 banter 2009 ss ner 01 , i ? n f r Supply Prepare Final Permitting anal Design Construction ' a Y MES V Environmental Feasibility Stud 3 s' if V1, Statement (FES) '3:~C:LKryi. - - . ITT IT w" Ir, f~ ~ x if Ni" ` a . « "uef s°ttaxrr i. t!" rii ,+.i 'IF ° ':vF.z w+.p\ v :ra. •m nP ~w ;g .ye, n <y,"ro+*., 4 THIRD AMENDMENT TO JOINT FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR IWRM WATER SUPPLY FEASIBILITY STUDY (AKA AS TUALATIN BASIN WATER SUPPLY PROJECT) This Amendment, dated , 2007 is between Clean Water Services (District), formerly known as Unified Sewerage Agency, a county service district formed by authority of ORS 451, the Tualatin Valley Water District, a domestic water district formed by authority of ORS 264 and the cities of Hillsboro, Beaverton, Forest Grove and Tigard, all municipal corporations of the State of Oregon (Partners) and amends the parties' Joint Funding Agreement - IWRM Water Supply Feasibility Study dated June 20, 2001 as amended by the First Amendment dated November 14, 2002, and the Second Amendment dated December 4, 2003 (collectively, JFA). RECITALS 1. The Partners previously entered into the JFA under which the Partners agreed to jointly fund a study of the feasibility of alternative approaches to increase the water supply and evaluate the "no action alternative." 2. The Partners now wish to amend the JFA to fund additional tasks to complete the Tualatin Basin Water Supply Project Draft Planning Report/ Environmental Impact Statement, and Title Transfer Project (collectively, Project). The Water Supply Feasibility Study was completed in March 2004. 3. The Partners also wish to amend the JFA to address the acquisition and disposition of Project assets upon termination of the JFA or termination of any Partner's participation in the JFA secured during the development of the Project. TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Section 2 of the JFA is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 112. Cost Share Each party's share of the cost of the Project shall be proportional to the party's projected share of the additional water supply as of the date of this agreement, assuming 50,600 acre-feet of additional supply. The cost share for each party shall be equal to the percentage indicated in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein." 2. Pursuant to Section 4 of the JFA, the cities of Cornelius, Banks, North Plains, Sherwood and Tualatin voluntarily terminated their rights and obligations under the JFA. Other Partners have assumed their rights and obligations as identified in Exhibit B. Page 1 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project Version updated - 5-8-07i 3. From the effective date of this Amendment, each Partner shall compensate District for its share of the cost of the Project as provided in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein. A revised payment schedule with reallocation of each Partner's share is included in Exhibit B. Total payment to District for compensation for services provided during fiscal year 2007-2008 shall not exceed $1.33 million. 4. The first sentence of Section 4 of the JFA is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: "Except as otherwise indicated in this Section, no party may terminate its rights and obligations under this Agreement until the Project is completed or a total of $5,797,400 has been expended, whichever occurs first." 5. Exhibit A of the JFA is hereby replaced with Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. 6. The previous Amendments to the JFA included funding for future real property purchases and other capital assets. 7. The purpose of this agreement is to enable the Partners to acquire real property, easements and other real property interests necessary for the Project (collectively, Property). The Partners grant District the authority to acquire Property necessary for the Project and to sign any documents on behalf of the Partners to purchase the Property. Any real property acquired shall be owned by the Partners as tenants in common. 8. Section 4 of the JFA established the conditions which must be met for any Partner to voluntarily terminate its rights and obligations. If any funding Partner terminates its rights and obligations under the JFA, it shall, upon the sale or transfer of any interest in the Project property, receive a share equal to the lesser of the following: a) the amount that the terminating Partner paid to purchase the Project property less that Partner's prorata share of all expenses incurred with respect to the Property including but not limited to costs of repairs, maintenance, debt service, all real and personal property taxes, governmental or other assessments levied against the Project property, title insurance premium, real estate commission, escrow fee, appraisal fee, recording fees and any other expenses incurred in connection with the sale or acquisition of the Project property (the foregoing expenses shall be referred to collectively as Expenses) or b) the amount of the terminating Partner's prorata share of the actual purchase price of the Project property less that Partner's prorata share of Expenses. The terminating Partner shall deliver to the nonterminating Partners a duly executed statutory warranty deed conveying the terminating Partner's interest in the Project property to the nonterminating Partners, or any other Partner that the nonterminating Partners may designate, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances except those existing as of the date such Partner terminated its interest in the JFA. 9. If the Project property is not sold or transferred within three years of the voluntary termination of any Partner, the nonterminating Partners shall purchase the terminating Partner's interest in the Project property in an amount equal to each nonterminating Partner's share as identified in the JFA. The nonterminating Partners shall have the Project property appraised and shall pay the terminating Partner the lesser of the following: a) the amount that the terminating Partner paid to purchase the Project property less that Partner's prorata share of all expenses incurred with respect Page 2 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project Version updated - 5-8-8=0: to the Property including but not limited to costs of repairs, maintenance, debt service, all real and personal property taxes, governmental or other assessments levied against the Project property and the prorata share of the appraisal fee (collectively, Costs) or b) the amount of the terminating Partner's prorata share of the actual appraised value of the Project property less that Partner's prorata share of Costs. The terminating Partner shall deliver to the nonterminating Partners a duly executed statutory warranty deed conveying the terminating Partner's interest'in the Project property to the nonterminating Partners, or any other Partner that the nonterminating Partners may designate, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances except those existing as of the date such Partner terminated its interest in the JFA. 10. If the Partners decide to terminate the JFA, they shall have the Project property appraised and list it for sale. Each Partner shall receive its prorata share of the actual purchase price of the Project property less such Partner's prorata share of Expenses. No terminating Partner shall be reimbursed for any other Project costs incurred before termination. 11. This Amendment shall be effective upon signing of all parties. 12. Except as amended herein, the JFA shall remain in full force and effect. The above is hereby agreed to by the Partners and executed by the duly authorized representatives below: CLEAN WATER SERVICES APPROVED AS TO FORM By: District General Counsel Date: TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Attorney Date: CITY OF HILLSBORO APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Attorney Date: Page 3 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project Version updated -5.8-Oi CITY OF BEAVERTON APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Attorney Date: CITY OF FOREST GROVE APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Attorney Date: CITY OF TIGARD APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Attorney Date: Page 4 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project Version updated - 5-8-07 Exhibit A SCOPE OF WORK AND PROJECT ELEMENTS T UALA TIN BASIN WATER SUPPLY PROJECT The following is areview of the various phases and project elements: Water Supply Project - Completion of Draft Planning Report/Environmental Impact Statement (PR/DEIS) 1. Complete Draft PR/EIS for public review and distribution. 2. Coordinate with Bureau of Reclamation on existing operations ESA consultation. 3. Prepare Biological Assessment and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act reports for Water Supply Project consultations. Title Transfer Project - Draft Environmental Assessment Review (EA) for Title Transfer Process 1. Develop Draft EA for Title Transfer Additional Combined Projects Elements The following are additional Project elements handled with separate contracts or agreements: 1. Governmental and Public Affairs - Consultant contracts to continue efforts to secure federal funding assistance, and community support at local, regional and national levels. Additional resources will be developed based on a comprehensive public affairs strategy. 2. Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Pacific Northwest Regional Office and Technical and Engineering Services a. Comprehensive Facilities Review - Inspect and assess condition of Reclamation Facilities. Develop the recommended improvements and cost estimates for the improvements. b. Biological Resources Coordination - Coordinate of existing operations consultation with EIS and permitting requirements. Determine environmental and associated mitigation elements, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife mitigation areas implementation. 3. Governance Structure Development and Contract Negotiations for Title Transfer Project a. Conduct a governance structure development process with local agencies to establish an organization(s) to accept the rights and responsibilities of the transferred Reclamation Facilities. A contractor will assist with development, negotiations and preparation of the various contractual and intergovernmental agreements with the Partners. The contractual elements will include operations, management and administration of the transferred facilities. Page 5 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project Version updated-5-8-97 4. Land Survey and Easement investigation a. Conduct a land survey, title search and related real estate activities to determine the status of the Reclamation lands and interests for the potential title transfer project. These services may include surveying, appraisals, document research and environmental assessments for the various elements of the Title Transfer Project. Continued coordination with Reclamation Lands Resources staff on review of lands acquisition needs and requirements. 5. Clean Water Services Project Management - Continued project management and staff support for the Water Supply and Title Transfer Projects. 6. Miscellaneous expenses - The tasks and elements of the Project not currently provided for in the above listed items. Page 6 of 5 Third Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement for Water Supply Project Version updated- 5-8-07 Tualatin Basin Water Supply Project and Tualatin Project Title Transfer Payment Schedule for Title Transfer and WSP Draft Environmental Impact Statement Phase For FY07-08 - WSP - JFA 3rd amendment Project Manager - Tom VanderPlaat Date 5/4/07 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT SCHEDULE (Based on reallocation and Percentage Share) Water % Share Total FY07-08 FY07-08 FY07-08 FY07-08 FY07-08 Allocations Costs Qtr1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan- Mar Apr-Jun Ac - ft MGD 100.0% 20.0% 30.0% 30.0% 20.0% 100.0% Water Quality " Clean Water Service 9,320 25.3 17.62% $234,334 $46,867 $70,300 $70,300 $46,867 $234,334 M&I City of Tigard 8,649 15.7 16.35% $217,445 $43,489 $65,234 $65,234 $43,489 $217,445 TVWD**** 23,091 41.8 43.65% $580,558 $116,112 $174,167 $174,167 $116,112 $580,558 City of Hillsboro 9,656 17.5 18.25% $242,770 $48,554 $72,831 $72,831 $48,554 $242,770 City of Beaverton 1,763 3.2 3.33% $44,333 $8,867 $13,300 $13,300 $8,867 $44,333 City of Forest Grov 420 0.8 0.79% $10,560 $2,112 $3,168 $3,168 $2,112 $10,560 Total M&I 43,579 78.9 82.38% $1,095,666 $219,133 $328,700 $328,700 $219,133 $1,095,666 Sub Total 52,900 104.2 100.00% $1,330,000 $266,000 $399,000 $399,000 $266,000 $1,330,000 WQ(exisiting) 12,618 22.8 M&1 (existing w/LOC) 14,000 25.3 *Inactive (Dead) Storage Irrigation 27,022 " CWS demands based on 120 day season Fish and Wildlife M&I Demands based on 180 day season Recreation* 6,900 ****Note - Sherwood Shares transferred to TVWD (2000 af) Hydro power Flood Management Note: The Cities of North Plains, Cornelius and Banks elected not to sign the Joint Funding Agreement (JFA) - 2nd amendment. Total (active storage 106,540 Cities of North Plains and Cornelius shares were transferred to Total Storage 113,440 $1,330,000 City of Hillsboro City of Banks shares were allocated proportionally to all Partners under the Joint Funding Agreement - Second Amendment. Cities of Tualatin and Sherwood have decided not sign the JFA- 3rd amendment and their shares will be allocated to TVWD. The Worksheets will be reviewed following the release of the WSP draft PR/EIS Agenda Item # Meeting Date June 19, 2007 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue/Agenda Title Meeting with Oregon Department of Transport ation Region 1 Manager, Jason Tell ' lj Prepared By: A.P. uenas Dept Head Approval: City Mgr Approval: ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Continuing dialogue with the ODOT (Oregon Department of Transportation) Region 1 Manager, Jason Tell, to discuss various issues of importance to both the City of Tigard and ODOT. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That Council continue discussions with the Region 1 Manager to facilitate the close coordination and partnership with ODOT needed to implement key projects aimed at improving traffic circulation on Highway 99W, Hall Boulevard, and on other arterials and collectors within the City. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Council had an initial meeting with Jason Tell, the new ODOT Region 1 Manager, at the Council meeting on January 23, 2007. The meetings with the Region 1 Manager are part of an effort to establish a closer working relationship with ODOT staff, to share information of significance, and to help resolve issues that may need direction from top management in ODOT. The periodic meetings began with Matthew Garrett, the previous Region 1 Manager and now ODOT Director. Council wishes to continue that dialogue with Mr. Tell via periodic meetings (every six months or so) for discussion of current and potential issues. Some of the issues of significance for discussion at this meeting are: ■ The preparation of the Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan is nearing completion. The plan will identify a package of projects for future implementation. Funding will be needed to design and construct these projects. The City will be looking to partner with ODOT in funding some of these improvements to alleviate congestion on Highway 99W. The discussion of ODOT participation in implementing these improvements needs to begin early in the process and must be continued as projects are identified and prioritized. • The City has established a local fuel tax to provide funding for improvements to the Greenburg Road/Highway 99W/Main Street intersection. A petition has been filed to place the issue on the ballot and have the voters of Tigard decide if the tax should remain as established. If the tax does go to a vote and is upheld, ODOT's support and cooperation will be essential to the timely implementation of that project in conjunction with the Hall Blvd/Highway 99W intersection improvements. The Region 1 Manager can help greatly in ensuring that issues are resolved promptly during this process. The cities and counties in the metropolitan area have been asked to submit projects for inclusion in Metro's Regional Transportation Plan update. Metro has set target allocation amounts for the various jurisdictions, including ODOT. Many of the significant projects important to the City have components under ODOT jurisdiction. Given the limited dollars allocated to ODOT, it is likely that many of these components will not be included in ODOT's list of projects. This is a serious issue that needs discussion and resolution and should be a topic of discussion at this meeting. • ODOT, Washington County, and the City began exploratory discussions (initiated and led by ODOT staff) in January 2006 regarding conditions under which jurisdiction for Hall Boulevard could be transferred to either the City or the County. There is a general understanding that Hall Boulevard will have to be significantly improved before the City would consider accepting jurisdiction for that street. If ODOT is still pursuing transfer of Hall Boulevard, the City is receptive to continuing those discussions so that the conditions for the transfer of the street can be clearly defined. Like Mr. Garrett, Mr. Tell has indicated a willingness to periodically meet with Council and to be proactive in discussing and resolving current and potential issues in a timely manner. This close coordination between ODOT and the City will continue to receive strong emphasis as improvement projects are identified to alleviate congestion on highways and artetials (such as Highway 99W and Hall Boulevard) that are under ODOT jurisdiction but adversely impact infra-city circulation. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A. CITY COUNCIL GOALS Funding for major projects to improve Highway 99W meets the Council goal to "Seek funding for 99W improvements." ATTACHMENT LIST None. FISCAL NOTES No fiscal requirements at this time. Projects initiated and implemented would be funded through the City's Community Investment Program formulation process. The Hall Blvd/Highway 99W intersection project is currently funded in the amount of $4.9 million in the County's MSTIP 3 program, with a maximum additional contribution from ODOT of $750,000 to help address the project shortfall (the updated estimate for the project is almost $6.0 million) and enable the project to meet ODOT requirements prior to construction. The current estimate range for the Greenburg Road/Highway 99W intersection improvements is $4.0 to $4.5 million. The 3-cent local gas tax is expected to raise $4.5 to $5.0 million over a 5 year period. This revenue should be sufficient to fund the project. i:tenglgusbouncil agenda summadesX6-18-07 meeting with odot region 1 manager, jason tell.doe Agenda Item # Meeting Date June 19, 2007 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue/Agenda Title Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Update Prepared By: A.P. Duenas Dept Head Approval: City Mgr Approval: C. /C VV - ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Status update to Council on the progress that has been made towards completion of the plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That Council provide input on the draft plan at its current stage. Council comments will be considered in the selection and refinement of the preferred alternative and in the development of an implementation strategy for the recommended alternative. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan project is nearing completion. Alternatives aimed at improving traffic circulation, pedestrian safety, and enhancing transit use have been developed and evaluated. Three open houses have been conducted to receive public input and the comments received have been considered in the preparation of the draft plan. The next step is to select the preferred alternative and move ahead with refinement of that alternative followed by development of an implementation strategy. Council will be provided a summary of the following: • The project objectives • The timeline for completion • The progress to date • The three alternatives that have been developed • The results of the evaluation of those alternatives • The feedback from the public on the plan Council input on the alternatives will be requested and will be considered in the selection of the preferred alternative and in the development of an implementation strategy. The final plan will be brought back to Council for acceptance or adoption, possibly as early as July or August 2007. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A CITY COUNCIL GOALS The completed plan will present a recommended alternative with a list of projects intended to enhance the operation of the highway for motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users. The projects identified will provide the basis for efforts to "Seek funding for 99W improvements," which is one of the Council goals for 2007. ATTACHMENT LIST Highway 99W Project Overview. A brief progress report summarizing the findings for each major phase of the project will be included in the Council newsletter on Friday, June 8, 2007 for Council review prior to this meeting. FISCAL NOTES No fiscal requirements at this time. The completed plan will identify projects with estimated costs for future implementation. hen"us\council agenda summades\6-79-07 highway 99w corridor plan update ais.doc TIGARD 99W IMPROVEMENT PROJECT OVERVIEW AND MANAGEMENT PLAN PROJECTTIMELINE AND STEPS PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES ♦ Identify transportation and land use needs along the NOV 06 JAN 07 MAR 07 MAY 07 JUN 07 corridor. Needs ♦ Develop solutions for Highway 99W that help to Existing ABematives Affemarives Refinement Conditions Opportunities Development " AnaW Implementation accommodate regional and local travel. Constraints I ♦ Develop solutions for Highway 99W that balance the different modes of travel and provide for direct, safe and Protect Management efficient connections between the different modes. i : ♦ Reduce reliance on the motor vehicle as a mode of travel ~ Technical Advisory Committee Meetings using Highway 99W. Men Advhary CommRtee Meetings * * ♦ Ensure that solutions enhance the livability of the City of i Tigard and the surrounding area Open House Meetings i STUDYAREA & STUDY INTERSECTIONS HIGHWAY 99W SYSTEM DESIGN This chart shows how each individual agency/jurisdiction classifies Highway 99W based on individual mode of travel. An "X" indicates that there is no designation by that jurisdiction for that mode of travel. s i ° X X X X X X State Bikeway Regional X X Corridor X Existing RBS Existing RBS with LRS or RBT with LRS or RBT X X Potential Potential Statewide Regional Street 4 ° Highway Boulevard/Street Arterial Major Arterial X Through Truck Main Roadway X X Route Route RBS = Regional Bus Service lRS = light Rau Service RBT = Rapid Bus Transit Item No. _ ~r For Council Newsletter Dated ' b 41 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Councilors Craig Prosser, City Manager FROM: Gus Duen4 City Engineer RE: Highway 99W Corridor Study Summary Report DATE: June 7, 2007 Attached is a summary report on the progress to date of the Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan. This is to provide information in advance of the status update on the project scheduled for the workshop meeting on June 19, 2007. The detailed reports that have been released so far are available at the City's website under the Community Development Department, Capital Construction and Transportation Division (Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan link). The 3rd and final open house is scheduled for tonight (June 71h), after which the Alternatives Evaluation and Comparison report will be posted to the City's website. That report should be available for viewing by mid-week next week. Attachment c: Tom Coffee, Community Development Director Ron Bunch, Long Range Planning Manager i:leng~Quslmemorardums\highway 99w Corridor study summary reporl.doc J Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Summary Report on Findings to Date Existing Conditions State Highway 99W carries 45,000 to 50,000 vehicles daily through Tigard, half of which is regional traffic. The current peak-hour traffic demand is well beyond the highway's five-lane capacity. Future forecasts indicate highway performance will continue to deteriorate as trip demand in the corridor grows. The study corridor from I-5 to Durham Road is a four-mile stretch of highway with a retail/ commercial focus immediately adjacent to and on both sides of the highway. This retail focus results in higher traffic volumes during the PM and Saturday peak periods. The Project Overview (Attachment 1) shows the project goals and objectives, the project timeline and milestones, and depicts the study area. The following summarizes the existing transportation-related conditions within the study corridor: Motor Vehicles • Of the 20 intersections studied along the Highway 99W corridor, two intersection fail to meet performance standards during AM and PM peak travel times (at I-5. ramps and McDonald/Gaarde). Four other locations (Durham, Greenburg, Hall and Dartmouth) are at or near capacity during peak hour conditions. • These bottlenecks act to degrade travel times in the corridor and result in significant delays for corridor users. All of these locations have been identified as deficiencies in prior studies and are progressively degrading over time. • While ODOT has implemented corridor signal timing improvements, growth in traffic has acted to offset the operational gains of the signal timing. Current peak hour travel times are not better (average peak travel time is about 15 minutes compared to free flow travel time of about 6 to 7 minutes - the slowest observed travel times were about 20 minutes, 3 to 4 times the free flow time). • None of the study area intersections had calculated collision rates over 1.0 collisions per million entering vehicles. This would indicate that they are not high collision locations in comparison to other identified regional collision locations. • The proliferation of driveway access through the corridor (85 driveways in the study area) is in contrast to the high motor vehicle volume (45,000+ vehicles per day) the corridor services. These conflicts and the congestion contribute to collision potential. Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 1 of 13 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities • The study corridor generally has limited on-street sidewalk facilities and adequate bicycle facilities. Over the entire corridor, sidewalks are provided on approximately 70 percent of the length. Bicycle lanes exist on over 90 percent of the corridor. • The gaps in system facilities for pedestrian and bicycles, along with the volume and speed of motor vehicles, contribute to low utilization of these modes. During AM and PM peak hours bicycle volumes along the corridor do not exceed 10 bicyclists per hour and the pedestrian crossing numbers at intersections do not exceed 60 pedestrians per hour. Transit • There are 21 bus stop pairs in the 3.9 miles along Highway 99W in the study area. This averages about 980 feet per bus stop. • TriMet Route 12 serves OR 99W and is one of the more heavily patronized routes in the region handling about 6,000 passengers. Four bus stops were identified as not having controlled pedestrian crossings of Highway 99W and three others were located in positions that were away from signalized crossings. Redevelopment Potential From an economic perspective, extensive redevelopment along the corridor is not probable in the short-run. In the long-run, there are opportunities for redevelopment-more viable in some segments of the corridor than in others-but they will be capitalized on more extensively and more quickly if supported by targeted public investments. Key findings about conditions and trends: • Expected growth in Washington County and the City of Tigard suggests the possibility and need for intensifying land use in the corridor. Washington County is projected to continue to grow in population and employment over the next several decades. Tigard will make up a share of that growth, but will be constrained in that little vacant land remains within city limits. If the economy is to expand in Tigard, a substantial amount of new growth will need to be accommodated through intensifying the land use of underutilized properties. • Very little vacant land within the corridor indicates that density can only be increased substantially through redevelopment. Only five percent of the acres within the study area are made up of completely vacant land; there is little space to expand. Future development must realize a shift from split level shopping Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 2 of 13 centers to multi-storied commercial buildings able to accommodate retail, office and possibly residential uses. • Improvement-to-land value ratios suggest the possibility for long-run redevelopment. Roughly 33% of properties along the corridor have improvement values that are lower than the associated land value (have ratios less than 1), which is one indicator of some potential for redevelopment. A cursory visual analysis of properties along the corridor indicates that most of properties are in fair to good physical condition. In the short-run, any improvements to these properties will likely be minor and be considered as a refurbisbing (e.g., afresh coat of paint) before any major redevelopment occurs. In the longer-run, as land values increase and tax burdens follow suit, owners of properties with low improvement-to-land-value ratios will have increased incentives to improve or intensify their properties through redevelopment. • Increased densities in the corridor support regional public policy. The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) calls for a variety of actions-not just adding new capacity-to mitigate and manage increasing traffic in the Corridor. These include a combination of land-use and transportation strategies. The 2040 Growth Concept and the Regional Framework Plan envision designated corridors in the region as places for "densities that are somewhat higher than today and feature a high quality pedestrian environment and convenient access to transit." • Modest local retail strength and strong competition from nearby regional centers suggest that corridor redevelopment should be structured and concentrated to create a commercial identity for the Corridor. What is the redevelopment potential in the corridor? • Short-term: Low. Extensive redevelopment along the corridor is not likely in the next few years. Some locations show existing potential for redevelopment. They have low improvement-to-land value ratios (this is only one measure of potential for redevelopment), but field observations reflect that the improvements (buildings) are generally in good physical condition. Few are strong candidates for redevelopment in the near future. • Long-term: Modest to High, depending on the direction of public policy and the amount of public investment. In the next 10 to 20 years, market trends that encourage retail to locate at major intersections, disinvestment along strip corridors, increases in residential land values that are closing the gap between residential and commercial land values in the corridor, and increasing congestion will help to reshape the corridor. With the assistance of public policy and investment, these forces will cause modest change in the Corridor in the short run. If the public wants change in the corridor to happen in the years ahead and with coherence and pedestrian amenities, then policies at the state, regional, and local level to improve the corridor need to be supported with prioritization of public investment in the corridor. Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 3of13 Needs, Opportunities and Constraints This phase of the study identifies the transportation and land use needs and deficiencies along the Hwy 99W corridor, describes a number of potential enhancements that could be implemented to address these needs/ deficiencies, and evaluates the opportunities and constraints associated with implementation of the enhancements. All this information will be used in the development of alternatives for evaluation and comparison. Future Needs Future baseline transportation and land use needs must be determined for identifymi g issues and setting the stage for alternatives development to address these future needs. The future needs are a function of the future land uses and future travel demand along Hwy 99W. It is often useful to address future needs by mode of travel to focus the identification of deficiencies to a particular travel mode. However, many of the needs can (and typically are) interrelated between modes of travel. For the purpose of this study, the future needs have been identified by mode of travel and by land use. Bicycle Bicycle policies for the region aim to provide safe, continuous, and accessible facilities. The shoulders of Hwy 99W currently allow for bicycle use throughout the majority of the corridor by providing bicycle lanes. The following needs have been identified for bicycle access and circulation along (and connecting to) Hwy 99W: • Elimination ofgaps in the hiycle network - Gaps in the existing bicycle network occur in the north portion of the study area from SW 72-d Avenue to Interstate 5, a gap along approximately 10% of the corridor (approximately 2,500 feet). With the exception of the Interstate 5 overpasses, Barbur Boulevard to the north of the study area currently has bicycle lanes that extend and lead into Downtown Portland. • Local/Regional connectivity - There is a need to provide connections to/from H-%vy 99W to connecting facilities to fill in the regional and local bicycle network. • Vehicle/Bicycle conflicts - There are an excessive number of driveways that currently exist along the Hwy 99W corridor. These present a conflict between bicycles using the bike lanes on Hwy 99W and motor vehicles turning into/out of the driveways. Pedestrian Pedestrian travel in and around the study area needs to provide a safe, efficient and interconnected system that can afford users the ability to consider walking for trips that are Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 4 of 13 one mile in length or less. The following needs have been identified for pedestrian access and circulation along (and connecting to) Hwy 99W- • Elimination ofgaps in the sidewalk network - The existing sidewalk network has approximately 20% gaps in the network. This represents over 2 miles of sidewalks that create a discontinued pedestrian environment (approximately 1 mile each on both the east and west sides). These gaps occur sporadically along the corridor and are not focused in any one particular area. However, some of the gaps are at major intersections that have side street facilities, for example Bull Mountain Road. • Locall Regional connectivity - Many of the side streets have existing sidewalks that provide access to Hwy 99W, however there are a number of side streets that currently do not have sidewalks (or gaps in the sidewalk network) that have been identified in the Tigard TSP as pedestrian access roads to Hwy 99W. The streets that do not have full pedestrian access to Hwy 99W and are specifically identified to provide it are SW 68th Avenue, SW 71st Avenue, McDonald Street and Canterbury Lane. • Vehicle/Pedestrian conflicts - There are an excessive number of driveways that currently exist along the Hwy 99W corridor. These present a conflict between pedestrians using the sidewalks on Hwy 99W and motor vehicles turning into/out of the driveways. • Crossing Hwy 991Y/- The existing signalized crossing points on Hwy 99W are on average 1,000 feet apart, which result in relatively infrequent opportunities for pedestrians to get across Hwy 99W. Where pedestrian crossings do exist, the crossings themselves are not very inviting for pedestrian use with long crossings and minimal waiting areas. • Adequately designed facilities - A majority of existing sidewalks along Hwy 99W are adjacent to the corridor without any buffer space such as a landscape strip, and many of the existing sidewalks are sub-standard for width resulting in a narrow walkway for pedestrians. • Access to transit issues - There are driveways at or near bus stops at 8 locations that provide a barrier for pedestrian access to/from transit stops. In addition, there are transit stops that have cross connectivity issues associated with accessing transit across Hwy 99W. • Access to local properties - Pedestrians need a safe, reasonably direct way to get from street-side sidewalks to adjacent destinations like office buildings and stores. Many properties along Hwy 99W lack good pedestrian connections to the street. In some cases, sidewalk connections are missing, which requires pedestrians to walk through parking lots. In other cases, pedestrian connections are too long, too indirect, or too few. Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 5 of 13 Transit Regional transit policies focus on providing a safe transit system that maximizes accessibility and meet's the current and projected transportation needs of the general population. Providing access to/from this system is critical to accomplish this. All transit patrons start as pedestrians as well, and therefore good pedestrian facilities/amenities can help to support and encourage transit ridership. The following needs have been identified for transit service and access along Hwy 99W: • Poorly serviced areas - The current transit service along Hwy 99W has areas that are poorly served in approximately 7 locations. In addition to these 7 areas the southern portion of the study area has extensive areas to the east and west that are not serviced by transit at all. • Access/Coifict issues- There are driveways at or near bus stops at 8 locations that provide a barrier for pedestrian access to/from transit stops. In addition, there are transit stops that have cross connectivity issues associated with accessing transit on Hwy 99W. These access/conflict issues arise with driveways that are in the direct path of pedestrians accessing transit stops on one side or the other of Hwy 99W, as well as transit stops being located at unsignalized intersections without a safe pedestrian crossing to get across Hwy 99W. • Transit to other modes - Providing connectivity to other modes of travel along side streets that connect to the corridor. A number of side streets have been identified that would need better connectivity to provide access to transit via side streets. Motor Vehicle Traffic volumes were forecasted for the 2030 roadway system and analysis was conducted to identify intersection performance needs at study area intersections. In addition to these measures, access along the corridor and collisions at intersections were evaluated by examining the following: • Growth in through vehicles • Growth in side street activity • Inadequate capacity at intersections • Recurring bottlenecks • Access locations Travel demand patterns indicate that a small portion of trips on the corridor are local in nature (39/6), while a larger number of trips either start or end their trip within the corridor but the other end of their trip is outside the corridor area (44%). The greatest number of trips use the corridor as a through travel route and do not start or end their trip within the corridor (531/6). Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 6 of 13 The current land use and zoning that fronts the Hwy 99W corridor is primarily retail in nature with residential land uses behind the retail environment. The retail land uses have traditionally been developed with large parking areas that create an auto-dominated environment. This results in rising trip demand and congestion within and along Hwy 99W. There is a need to shift the development pattern along Hwy 99W to provide for a more balanced use of all modes of travel. This points to a need for: • Redevelopment Principles • Zoning and Plan Changes • Modal changes that encourage transit, pedestrian and bicycle improvements Enhancement Concepts There are a variety of potential ways to deal with the future needs previously identified. Table 3-1 (Attachment 2) addresses each mode individually with a set of potential enhancement concepts that could be utilized along the Hwy 99W corridor to address the deficiencies identified above, as well as additional concepts that could help reduce auto reliance and promote alternative modes of travel. A set of "pros" and "cons" is listed for each of these enhancements to address the benefits and/or limitations of implementing each. It is not expected or anticipated that all of the enhancement techniques listed in this table would be implemented along the corridor, but rather this provides a range of concepts that could be considered for implementation based on the applicability and appropriateness to address location specific needs. Opportunities/ Constraints There are a number of potential opportunities and constraints associated with implementing some of the previously identified enhancement concepts on the corridor. Opportunities to apply these enhancements focus on the ability to implement the enhancement/improvement with minimal impact to other modes or land use. Constraints /limitations occur when the implementation of the enhancement/improvement conflicts with the goal of balancing and/or enhancing modes of travel. Examples of these trade-offs include (but are not limited to) such concepts as: • Widening Hwy 99W to include a seven lane cross-section from Interstate 5 to Greenburg Road would provide additional capacity that is automatically utilized. This widening presents a barrier for pedestrians and bicycles crossing Hwy 99W by creating a longer distance to cross the corridor. There is the added constraint of cost associated with this type of undertaking due to the significant cost to replace the Hwy 217 overpass because it is too narrow for a seven lane cross-section. There is also the constraint of additional right-of-way impacts to adjacent properties (from right-of-way takings), and additional traffic with impacts associated with it including emissions and noise. Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 7 of 13 • In contrast to widening, using lower cost enhancements such as driveway closures can provide benefit for progression and throughput of vehicles on the corridor, while benefiting pedestrian, bicycle and transit by reducing conflict points. Implementing this type of enhancement has a negative connotation associated with it because it does limit access to parcels. However, studies have shown that limiting the access along roadways does not degrade businesses viability. Special consideration should be made when evaluating which access points to potentially limit in order to assure an efficient and balanced system for all modes of travel. • Providing pedestrian /bicycle connections every 330 feet and/or local street connections every 660 feet. Careful consideration should be given to locations to implement these types of connections. Emphasis should be placed on creating a tightly spaced grid system that promotes walkable neighborhoods and access to transit, but not focused on providing crossings of Hwy 99W at these spacing standards. • Providing additional turn lanes. This could help provide acceptable traffic operational standards at intersections, however they could also create a longer crossing distance for pedestrians and adequate crossing time for pedestrians would need to be accommodated which may compromise throughput on the corridor. In addition, by implementing an improvement such as a turn pocket (especially a right turn pocket) there is the opportunity to implement a wider sidewalk and/or pedestrian landscape buffer. However this may require additional right-of-way. • Redesigning intersections with tighter and better curb radii. This allows for the opportunity to allow for shorter crossing for pedestrians, but has the limitations associated with reduced vehicle turning speeds that could impact intersection operations and/or through vehicle maneuvers. Evaluation of the enhancement concepts must explore the modal trade-offs associated with implementing enhancements in the developed alternatives. Areas of Focus Review of the needs along the corridor (both transportation and land use), and where these needs occur start to identify specific areas to focus the potential enhancements identified earlier. Based on the previously identified needs, the following areas have been identified that have similar constraints or are similar in nature for potential enhancements: • Interstate 5 to Hwy 217 - This area has been identified due to the constrained capacity conditions, frequent driveway locations, deficient intersection operations and poor access between transit and pedestrian uses. • Highway 217 to Walnut Street - This area has been identified due to the constrained capacity conditions near Greenburg Road and Hall Boulevard. There Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 8of13 are similar transit and pedestrian accessibility issues while being centrally located near the Tigard Downtown area. • Walnut Street to Gaarde/McDonald intersection - This area has been identified for focus due to the closely spaced surrounding driveways and the higher frequency of collision occurrences. There is a potential for enhancing pedestrian and transit connections. • Gaarde/McDonald intersection to Durham Road - This area has been identified as a segment of the corridor to focus on due to constrained intersection operations (due primarily to growth in side street traffic), as well as lack of a continuous pedestrian environment and connectivity to transit service. Evaluation Criteria for Hwy 99W Concepts Category Criteria General Mobility Does the concept provide a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.95 or better for projected 20-year traffic demand per the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan? Does the concept create queuing issues along Hwy 99W or on the cross streets? Concept Modes Does the concept provide safe, convenient, and reasonably direct access along and across Hwy'99W: • For transit? • For bicycles? • For pedestrians? • If the Concept presents obstacles for concept modes, can these be reasonably mitigated within the concept? Freight Does the concept provide for connections and design considerations for freight activity to/from, as well as through, the corridor? Safety Does the concept reduce or minimize turning conflicts affecting vehicles and other modes? Design Standards Does the concept meet access spacing standards (1,320 feet for Statewide Highway) per the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan? Does the concept accommodate a "-67 design vehicle per ODOT Route Map 7? Is the concept consistent with the design standards of ODOT,Washington County, Metro, and the City of Tigard? Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 9 of 13 Does the concept qualify for design exceptions from ODOT/FHWA for design features that do not meet standards? Impacts How does the concept impact adjacent/ fronting properties to Hwy 99W? How many properties are affected? How much right-of-way would need to be purchased? Does the concept avoid environmental impacts? If not, what are the impacts? Cost What is the planning level construction cost estimate for the concept? Concepts Developed Three different concepts have been developed for this phase of the project and have individual themes focused on enhancing the connectivity and operations of the corridor in different ways. Inherent to all concepts is providing a balanced multimodal environment especially related to pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements. Therefore each concept will contain bicycle lanes, as well as sidewalks with landscape buffers all built to the ODOT standard. It is not expected that any one concept is going to be the single solution for Hwy 99W, but by representing the concepts that have multiple elements (across multiple focus areas) it allows for a "mix and match" of elements that are the most appropriate to each specific area as well as the entire corridor. The three concepts are: • Concept A - Partial Widening • Concept B - Access Management • Concept C - Full Widening Attachments 3-A through 3-C show each of these concepts in greater detail. Evaluation of Concepts The three concepts were evaluated and compared for this phase of the project. Each was evaluated and compared by generally applying criteria developed previously to help develop the concepts. While it is not expected that any one concept will solve all the deficiencies in the future along Hwy 99W, the goal is to identify a solution that, on balance, best supports project objectives, including multi-modal travel needs, while minimizing negative impacts. The following is a brief summary of the findings for each of the criteria evaluated: Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 10 of 13 • Pedestrian - All concepts contain the same pedestrian improvement--widened sidewalks, separated from the roadway with a landscape strip. Widening of Hwy 99W creates longer pedestrian crossings, requiring longer red lights at traffic signals to accommodate walkers, which can reduce the operational efficiency of signals for vehicle traffic, especially through traffic. • Bicycle - All concepts contain the same bicycle improvement of bike lanes along the entire corridor. But concepts that add travel lanes to 99W could negatively impact the bicycling environment by making the highway more intimidating to cyclists crossing the road or making left turns. Similar to the pedestrian environment, a wider cross-section of Hwy 99W could be detrimental to bicycle travel along Hwy 99W for bicyclists that need to traverse from the bike lane across the corridor to make a left turn at intersections. • Transit - All concepts include relocating transit stops to help minimize impacts with existing driveways for pedestrians and bicycles. Areas where the corridor are widened to a 7 lane cross-section do not allow for transit queue bypasses due to the additional width (right-of-way) necessary to implement them. Therefore areas where queue bypass lanes are not implemented would require transit to operate in the general purpose traffic lanes. This could create delay for transit service. Concepts A and B both contain transit queue bypasses, however Concept B has the opportunity to implement more than Concept A. Concept C has no transit queue bypass lanes. Concept A would save approximately 1 '/z minutes of delay to bus travel times, while Concept B would save approximately 2 '/z - 3 minutes of delay to bus travel tunes. In terms of right-of-way impact, Concept C would have the equivalent right-of-way impact of adding a dedicated transit lane along the entire Hwy 99W corridor. • Motor Vehicle - Concepts that add travel lanes provide additional vehicle capacity, which can improve intersection operations and reduce congestion. However, the additional capacity is almost fully consumed by traffic demand between Interstate 5 and Hwy 217, and then pumps additional vehicles south of Hwy 217. The widening for Concept A, as recommended in the Regional Transportation Plan, stops at SW Greenburg Road, so additional vehicles added to the corridor south of that degrade intersection operations even further because the additional capacity is not available, and more localized improvements are necessary that include additional travel lanes in each direction in the SW Gaarde/McDonald area. Concept C widens the corridor the entire length, but past the downtown area volumes taper off to a level where the additional capacity is more than what is typically needed for the 20 year planning horizon. The addition of the SW Walnut Street extension is beneficial under any concept because it helps to decrease the volumes on Hwy 99W between SW Walnut Street and the Hwy 217 northbound ramp by providing an access to the south for the Tigard Triangle area and downtown Tigard. Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 11 of 13 - • Safety - Additional access management through the use of medians and/or driveway closure/ consolidation is beneficial to safety because conflict points are eliminated, reducing the potential for vehicle crashes. Concept B has the highest reduction in potential conflict points by 70% along the entire corridor. Concepts A and C focus access management within the interchange areas (1,320 feet) and have the potential to reduce collision points by up to 75% in the interchange areas. The raised medians used extensively in Concept B reduce opportunities for left turns directly into driveways, but this concepts allows for U-turns at intersections, so that destinations across the road are still accessible. • Property Impacts and Costs - Based on the right-of-way necessary to implement each concept there is a different level of impacts to properties associated with property only and widening that impacts buildings as well. Concept B has the least amount of property and buildings impacts at approximately 953,000 square feet. Concept A has the next highest impact to property and buildings at approximately 1.16 million, while Concept C has the highest impact at approximately 1.58 million square feet. Consequently, Concept C has the highest cost associated with implementation due to that larger right-of- way from widening, and the cost associated with the physical infrastructure of widening itself, while Concept A has the second least cost and Concept B has the least cost for implementation. Results of the Evaluation Concept B (Access Management) tends to best achieve the goals of the project. Elements from the other two concepts can still incorporated (if desired) to form the preferred final concept. Attachments 4-A through 4-G show the evaluation results for the various criteria. Attachment 5 summarizes the overall results and indicates an overall rating for each of the three concepts. What's Next? The next step is to formulate the preferred concept using input from the technical and citizen advisory committees, the public comments from the three open houses, and Council feedback at the June 19, 2007 workshop meeting. Following completion of the report, the final plan will be brought to Council for acceptance or adoption, most likely in August 2007. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Project Overview Attachment 2 - Table 3-1. Enhancement Concepts (2 pages) Attachment 3-A - Concept A Attachment 3-B - Concept B Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 12 of 13 Attachment 3-C - Concept C Attachment 4-A - Pedestrian Environment Attachment 4-B - Bicycle Environment Attachment 4-C - Transit Environment Attachment 4-D - Motor Vehicle Environment Attachment 4-E - Safety Environment Attachment 4-F - Safety Environment (continued) Attachment 4-G - Property Impacts and Costs Attachment 5 - Comparison of Concepts i:tengtguslhighway 99wtluogress summarythighway 99w condor pan status update sunvnary.doc Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan Status Update Summary Page 13 of 13 AND D MANAGEMENT O PLANT PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECTTIMELINE AND STEPS PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES ♦ Identify transportation and land use needs along the NOV 06 JAN 07 MAR 07 MAY 07 JUN 07 corridor. Needs ♦ Develop solutions for Highway 99W that help to Existing Opportunities Alternatives Alternatives Refinement Conditions Development Analysis Implementation accommodate regional and local travel. Constraints ; Z c W t' ♦ Develop solutions for Highway 99W that balance the different modes of travel and provide for direct, safe and ProjeciManagement ;LL ;LL efficient connections between the different modes. ♦ Reduce reliance on the motor vehicle as a mode of travel Technical A&isory Committee Meetings j j i-•~k-- - •~le___ -.....>Ic using Highway 99W. citizen Advlson• CommiH°e Meetings * * ♦ Ensure that solutions enhance the livability of the City of Tigard and the surrounding area Open House Meetings STUDY AREA & STUDY INTERSECTIONS HIGHWAY 99W SYSTEM DESIGN 0 This chart shows how each individual agency/jurisdiction classifies Highway 99W based on individual mode oS~ of travel. An "X" indicates that there is no designation by that jurisdiction for that mode of travel. . • o D 0 • • . _ ~ - O • X X •X X Xm a) 1A, X State Bikeway Regional X X Corridor ¢m~ ` X Existing RBS Existing RBS with LRS or RBT with LRS or RBT X X Potential Potential Statewide a ° Highway Arterial Arterial MaJ 'orArterial Boulev d/Street X Through Truck Main Roadway X X Route = Reglonm Bus serwae Route Attachment 1 UM = light Rao Servke RAT = Rapid Bus Trudt Attachment 2 DKS Associates IRANSPOHI'ATIOfJ SOLUTIONS Table 3.1. Enhancement Conce is Enhancement Area Enhancement Itern Pros coils Bicycle • Fill gaps in bicycle network on Hwy 99W. • Better connectivity to potentially shift mode choice to utilize the bicycle • Heavy motor vehicle volumes on major roadway may create an facilities, uninviting bicycle environment. • Safer bicycle environment. • Some additional right-of-way may be necessary to complete bicycle network. • Bicycle lanes along 99W could create additional conflicts with right turning vehicles. • Bicycle lanes could conflict with existing transit stops. • Provide bicycle lanes on appropriate side streets that connect to Hwy 99W. Better connectivity on lower volume roadways (side streets) to potentially Some additional right-of-way may be necessary to complete bicycle shift mode choice to utilize the bicycle facilities, network. • Safer bicycle environment. • Bicycle lanes may conflict with on-street parking. • Bicycle lanes along 99W could create additional conflicts with right turnip vehicles. • Provide bicycle user amenities such w wayfinding signage, secure bicycle • More direct and defined connections to/from bicycle destinations. • Limited impact to creating new bicycle users compared to other options. storage facilities, and bicycle loop detectors at signalized intersections. • Enhanced bicycle environment. • Relative) low cost for bicycle amenity features Pedestrian • Pedestrian connectivity through filling in gaps in sidewalk network. . Better connectivity to potentially shift mode choice to utilize the • Enhanced sidewalks could require additional right-of-way. pedestrian environment. • Potential environmental constraints via conflict of wetlands or other • Better connectivity from the street to land uses encourages walking and environmental concerns that conflict with pedestrian enhancement. breaks down barriers of access. Potential for relocation of existing utilities due to new pedestrian • Safer pedestrian environment. improvements. • Additional crossings at unsignalized locations through pedestrian actuated • More crossing opportunities. • Minimal opportunity to implement these due to access spacing standards. signals. . Better connective across H 99W • Unsi nalized intersections could be unsafe. • Enhanced pedestrian environment by widening sidewalks where . More walkable pedestrian environment. • Could require additional right-of-way for implementation. appropriate and complementary to land uses. • Safer pedestrian environment. • Implement curb extensions (only appropriate where on-street parking • Minimize pedestrian crossing distances. • May conflict with bicycle lanes on side streets. exists). • Safer pedestrian environment. Not appropriate on H 99W • Implement pedestrian refuges on Hwy 99W for "two-stage" crossing • Reduces reliance to cross Hwy 99W in one crossing, and breaks the total • Requires additional right-of-way to implement a center median for opportunities crossing into two different crossing stages. Pedestrian refuge. • Better intersection design with tighter curb radii. . Potential to reduce crossing distances Reduced vehicle honing speeds which lead to potential intersection • May create additional space for pedestrians at intersections capacity constraints. • Provide pedestrian crossings for all legs of intersections at signalized • Provides additional crossing opportunities along the Hwy 99W corridor Longer crossings take additional time for pedestrians to cross, which can intersections. and on side streets. impact the operations of an intersection. • Better connectivity for pedestrians. • Accommodating pedestrians at signalized intersections conflicts with turning vehicles which reduces motor vehicle operations at intersection. • Potential conflicts with left turning vehicle movements which are typically protected movements. • Planting strip along Hwy 99W would create a buffer between vehicles and • Safer pedestrian environment. Planting strip could require additional right-of-way for implementation. pedestrians. • Provide pedestrian amenities such as wayfinding signage to direct . More direct and defined connections to/from pedestrian destinations. • Additional cost in installing special paving. pedestrians along Hwy 99W and to alternative pedestrian routes and/or • Enhanced pedestrian environment. • Special paving could require special maintenance, special paving or texture treatment for pedestrians. • Special paving (depending on material used) could break down faster than typical asphalt or concrete and need to be replaced sooner. • Limited impact to creating new pedestrian users compared to other options, Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan 9 January 15. 2007 Task 3.1: Needs, Opportunities h Constraints Report DRAFT DKS Associates TPANS130RIAI'IDN SULUPIONS Table 3-1. Enhancement Concepts Continued Enhancement Area Enhancement Item Pros Cons Transit • Implement signal priority (early green and/or green extension) at key • More efficient and reliable transit travel times. • Implementation cost may be high. Existing System intersections. • Less potential delay for buses. Enhancements • Create "in-lane" transit stops which do not require the transit vehicle to More efficient and reliable transit travel times. "In-lane" transit stops reduce the effective roadway capacity by partially pull-out of the flow of traffic. Less potential delay for buses. blocking a lane of travel for a short period of time. • "In-lane transit stops eliminate the need for transit vehicles to merge back into the travel lane thus reducing the potential for conflict with motor vehicles. • Incorporate Intelligent Transportation Solutions (ITS) such as advanced Better distribution of transit information. Implementation cost may be high. transit traveler information at transit kiosks. • Use of "far-side" transit stops at signalized intersections to get transit More efficient and reliable transit travel times. May impact existing land uses/driveways, bicycle lanes, and/or _ vehicles through an intersection to help reduce potential delay at an Less potential delay for buses. sidewalks/pedestrian connections. intersection. • Provide for safe transit stops with adequate waiting space. • Enhanced transit environment. May require additional right-of-way for implementation. • Enhance existing service area to include east and west areas that currently • Less potential reliance on motor vehicle usage by providing a better Implementation cost may be high. have minimal or no transit servicelcoverage. connected and usable system. • Implementing new transit service to areas that have no service can be Better transit usage through new service to current) unserviced areas. costly. Transit • Fixed guideway system such as light rail transit (LRT), busway or bus Great potential to shift trips from motor vehicles to transit system. • Significant cost to implement. High Capacity rapid transit (BRT). • Potential for improved air quality (due to reduced number of vehicles). • May require additional right-of-way, which involves additional impacts Transit (HCT) along Predictable and reliable travel limes (if HCT is implemented on a and costs. 99W dedicated guideway). • Operating and maintenance expenses • Encourages transit oriented development that could reduce motor vehicle • May negatively impact some property access points. trips and encourage multimodal travel. Motor Vehicle • Access management through driveway closure and/or consolidation. • Fewer motor vehicle and pedestrian conflict points. Consolidating access can require newjoint access or cross-access between • Because turning vehicles cause traffic delay, reducing turning adjoining properties; negotiating this with owners can be difficult. opportunities reduces vehicle delay. • Left turn access could be eliminated,. • Could create potential cut-through in residential areas. • Access Management through median implementation. • Fewer motor vehicle and pedestrian conflict points. • Left turn access could be eliminated,. • Because turning vehicles cause traffic delay, reducing turning • Could create potential cut-through in residential areas. opportunities reduces vehicle delay • Median could require additional right-of-way in some locations along • Median allows for pedestrian refuge when crossing Hwy 99W.. Hwy 99W. • Median can be landscaped allowing for aesthetic improvement of Hwy • Maintenance is required for landscaped median. 99W. • Provision of "backage" roadway system to parallel Hwy 99W • Parallel roadway along sections of Hwy 99W to help reduce use of the • Current roadway alignment and parcels make implementation of a parallel highway for "local" trips, roadway difficult due to proximity (too close) to Hwy 99W. • Redevelopment of parcels along Hwy 99W through redevelopment could Barriers such as P&W rail line, Hwy 217 and Interstate 5 make it difficult make it easier to accommodate a "backage" roadway. to provide a continuous parallel route in the northern portion of the study • Provides alternative access to properties which can reduce reliance on Hwy area. 99W for only access. • Widen roadway at specific, limited locations, for example with additional • Provides better intersection operations. Right of way may not be available to accommodate widening. lanes or turn pockets, to accommodate traffic demand. • Reduced delay for motor vehicles. Widening could create longer edestrian/bicycle crossings. • Widen roadway with additional through lane(s) for a significant length • Widening Hwy 99W with additional through lane(s) allows for additional • Right of way may not be available to accommodate widening. along Hwy 99W vehicle throughput on Hwy 99W. • Widening of Hwy 99W with additional through lane(s) could create • Less potential motor vehicle travel tinnes, significant barrier for crossing corridor for bicycles and pedestrians. • Widening of Hwy 99W with additional through lane(s) creates some additional intersection deficiencies after widening is stopped due to additional vehicle demand that is attracted to con idor. • Incorporate Intelligent Transportation Solutions (ITS) such as signal • Better distribution of information to travelers. • Could be costly to implement and maintain. priority, traveler information signs (variable message signs), traffic • Possible savings in travel time by minimizing potential to wait in traffic. monitoring via close circuit television (CCTV) cameras, etc. Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan i0 January 25, 2007 Task 3. I: Needs, Opportunities & Constraints Report DRAFT Attachment 3-A Concept A - Partial Widening ■ Widen from five-lane cross section to seven-lane cross section from 1-5 to Greenburg Road ■ Localized capacity improvements south of Greenburg Road ■ Pedestrian improvements along entire corridor ■ Bicycle improvements along entire corridor ■ Transit improvements through stop relocation and queue bypass ■ Access Management within interchange area 7 Lane Cross Section • With Raised Median and Sidewalk Buffer 7 Lane Cross Section With Center Turn Lane and Sidewalk Buffer , .ti t t t 1 1 l Ib Raised sto I Center Et0 Median 12'.........,. 12' . ]2...... t.k'... G' i. 9'......, F 6:....;.4 4 ,.......!2' 12'.. .........AZ.......;....ium.lane..... _ 12'... t i2 _ ly... i.~b F q 1 d 8_..F4 i...4'...;.. .12 !2'.......... ~.2 . . . _ c Y. P.:1 vA . .=_?0-9.... _ _ . . _ _ . i.........._~.._......_............. _ _ _ - - _ _ _ 7Lane 124'R/W 7 Lane 114' R/W Typical 5 Lane Cross Section - With Center Turn Lane and Sidewalk Buffer ry a 1 1 4 t t 7 . ~ 10' Caniv E~• 13 iumlaix J2 1,2 b.......P a..._..., 12'...... ...4'.a.....b. ...).2'.... . 5 lane 100' R/W Attachment 3-B Concept B - Access Management ■ Aggressive access management along corridor through implementation of raised median and multiple driveway closure/consolidation ■ Localized capacity improvements at deficient intersections along corridor ■ Pedestrian improvements along entire corridor ■ Bicycle improvements along entire corridor ■ Transit improvements through stop relocation and queue bypass Typical 5 Lane Cross Section - With Center Turn Lane and Sidewalk Buffer Typical 5 Lane Cross Section - With Raised Median and Sidewalk Buffer 1~ 1 1 1 1 ~a - l l 1 1 Bike 16' Center he Bike 16' Ralsed Bice fl'...... Q' : b' 12 12 turn lane 12.. ] 2:.. 6 12.... 12' Median 12 .12 6 - 4:..;.......8" WCb ...._._........__......__...........__.._..._..._.._..._Curd-?4:_-...Zh __......._Curb-tacurb_ ?6'........ 5 1ane 100' R/W 5 1ane 100' R/W Attachment 3-C Concept C - Full Widening ■ Widen from five-lane cross section to seven-lane cross section for entire corridor, ■ Pedestrian improvements along entire corridor ■ Bicycle improvements along entire corridor ■ Transit improvements through stop relocation ■ Aggressive access management within interchange areas ■ Additional access management outside interchange areas 7 Lane Cross Section - With Raised Median and Sidewalk Buffer 7 Lane Cross Section - With Center Turn Lane and Sidewalk Buffer ~'~a 1 1 1 4 t t t v, 1 1 t t t ppe 16 RaLsed B!xo hie 16' Center x 1 12 7 Medan 12' 1.2 12 6' h'... I n PEER ..........12 :.....................1,2'.............._....._I2:..._..........G:._:...5:., .......8'..._.. .......8..... 6 7 .8.... ._..1. . 7 Lane 114' R W 7 Lane 114' R/W Attachment 4-A Pedestrian Environment ■ All concepts contain the same enhancements along the corridor ■ Qualitative and Quantitative ■ Widening 1 ~.,~-tea ■ Median treatment ■ Additional Crossings' Criteria Concept A Concept B Concept C Connectivity/Facilities 0 ■ D Additional Crossings F!] 0 0 Crossing Distance 0 o O Overall Rating O o O Evaluation Scale 0 o R o ■ Poor Medium Good Attachment 4-B Bicycle Environment ■ All alternatives contain the same enhancements along the corridor ■ Qualitative and Quantitative `ca ■ Widening ■ Median treatment Bike 8' 4' bl Criteria Concept A Concept B Concept C Connectivity Along Hwy 99W ■ ■ ■ Left Turn Traversing El 9 ❑ Crossing Distance O E ❑ Overall Rating o El EvaNation Scale o G 2 0 0 Poor Medium Goad Attachment 4-C Transit Environment ■ Variation in the types of treatments for the concepts ■ Qualitative and Quantitative ■ Widening Criteria Concept A4a Concept B Con, cept,.C Transit Speeds E ■ Access to Transit Stops 9 o O Transit Stop Relocation 0 p Overall Rating 9 O Evaluaflon Scab 0 0 2 o s Poor Medium Good Attachment 4-D Motor Vehicle Environment ■ Variation in the types of treatments for the concepts ■ Quantitative ■ Widening ■ Additional connectivity ■ Medians/Access management Criteria Concept A Concept B Concept C Traffic Operations El p p Overall Rating 0 0 EMuafibn Scare 0 0 0 0 Poor Medium Goad Attachment 4-E Safety Environment ■ Reducing potential collision points through driveway closure, driveway consolidation, driveway relocation and/or medians Closure: 9 to 0 Full Access Driveway Right-In/Right-out Access Consolidation: 18 to 9 Relocation: • 9 to CONFLICT DIAGRAM (ONFLICT DIAGRAM Three leg Three leg Medians: 9 to Z Intersection of intersection of a two-way a two-way street and an street and a unrestricted right-in/right- side street or out side street driveway or drivetivay CONFLICT POINTS CONFLI CT POINTS 0 tQerg'n4 _ w 0 MEUylruj = 1 X Uiv ..'r J X ©iaer"N m 1 Attachment 4-F Safety Environment ■ Variation in the types of treatments for the concepts Reduction in Potential Collision Points so% - - - ■ Quantitative 80% 70% - 75% - ■ Widening 50% 40% 30% - rv - ■ Additional connectivity 20oh - 10% _ 0% ■ Medians/Access management Concept A Concept B Concept C ` criteria t_ Concept A'` Concept'B` "Concept~.C, Reduction of motor vehicle collision points 0 ■ Reduction of pedestrian/bicycle collision ■ 0 points Overall Rating O ■ Evaluation Scale 13 C O a Poor Medium Good Attachment 4-G Property Impacts and Costs ROW Impacts Building Impacts Total Cost 1,400,000 350,000 $140.00 - a , 1,200,000 - 300,000 w' . $120.00 - 1,000,000 - - - - - 250,000 - _ = $100.00 - k., - LSL 800,000 200,000 _ $80.00 LA. c 600,000 i 3 150,000 B $60.00 - O 111 400,000 100,000 $40.00 - - - n 50,000 - $20.00 - - - - 200,000 t -1 L i 0 - $ 0 Concept A Concept B Concept C Concept A Concept B Concept C Concept A Concept B Concept C "Criteria Concept A: Concept B Concept C 9 Impact to properties (ROK9 El a ❑ Impact to buildings O D E Cost (not including ROIL 9 O ❑ Overall Rating O D O Eiaiuatron Scale o El D 0 ■ Poor Medium Good Attachment 5 Comparison of Concepts Evaluation Criteria Concept A Concept B Concept C Pedestrian F F!] Bicycle a o a Transit 0 O Motor Vehicle D O O Safety D ■ Property impacts and Cost C~7 O Overall Rating D Evaluation Scale G o 9 0 ■ Poor Medium (30011 ■ Concept B tends to achieve the goals of the project best ■ No "silver bullet" and items could still be mix and matched Agenda Item # Meeting Date 6 / 19 /07 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue/Agenda Title Amendment to Affordable Housing Fee Assistance Program Prepared By: Duane Roberts Dept Head Approval: City ' N4gr Approval ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should Council amend the guidelines for the award of affordable housing fee assistance funds by adding a provision that any funds not allocated during a budget year will be donated to the Community Housing Fund of Washington County? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council adopt the new guideline and consider imposing a requirement that any City-contributed dollars be reserved for projects located inside Tigard and used when needed. Should Council chose to attach this restriction to the donation of under-subscribed Fee Assistance funds, staff recommends this decision be implemented through the following motion: MOTION Council amends the adopted guidelines that define the requirements and conditions for the award of affordable housing fee assistance funds to add the following: 12. Any funds not allocated during a funding year will be donated to the Community Housing Fund of Washington County under the condition that any such (City-contributed) dollars will be reserved for projects located inside Tigard. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY In September 2002, as part of its Affordable Housing Program, Council adopted a budget set-aside designed to reduce fees and charges imposed on affordable housing acquisition, development, and rehabilitation. According to program guidelines, fee assistance applications are accepted twice per year Quly and December). Since adoption, the fund has been used to offset fees and charges imposed and anticipated on local projects sponsored by Community Partners for Affordable Housing (twice), Washington County Housing Services, and Luke-Dorf. The dollar amount of the fee subsidy set-aside is $10,000 annually. Because of the cyclical nature of projects and activities, available subsidy funds may not be needed in a particular year. At present, any funds not used in a funding year return to the City General Fund. The Community Housing Fund is a nonprofit organization that provides loans and grants for affordable housing development within Washington County. The Fund is an outgrowth of the County Vision 2000 process, which, among other deficiencies, identified a need for new sources of capital to assist affordable housing development. More detailed l:\L.RPL,N\Council Materials\2007\G-19-07 AIS Amendment to Affordable 1-lousing.doc 1 information about the Fund is provided in Attachment 1. Highlights are that the fund was established by Washington County in 2003. Beaverton and Hillsboro have each committed funding at the rate of one dollar per resident per year. Washington County contributes $110,000 annually. Other donors include religious groups and corporations. As its main program, the "Fund operates a revolving loan fund, making pre-development loans to take early conceptual planning of a given project to the point where conventional financing is feasible. The most common uses for loan dollars are: securing options on land, due diligence, architectural drawings, and attorney fees." Locally, Community Partners for Affordable Housing received a $25,000 grant from the Community Housing Fund for its Greenburg Oaks rehabilitation. The Tigard-based Luke-Dorf, received another $25,000 grant to partially finance a ten-unit residential facility located in Hillsboro. As noted above, under present guidelines, any Tigard Fee Assistance funds not used in a budget year automatically return to the City General Fund. An alternative use of these unused funds that would support affordable housing would be to contribute any "under-subscribed" funds in any budget year to the Community Housing Fund. Based on the four-year history of the Fee Subsidy Program, the average annual amount available would be in the $5,000 range. This is a relatively modest amount, especially considering the individual amounts ($80,000 to $110,000) annually contributed by the three jurisdictions that presently support the fund. To address a potential concern regarding the use of Tigard taxpayer dollars for affordable housing activities outside the City, the City contribution could be restricted. Should Council chose to do so, the allocation of any City-donated dollars could be reserved for projects located inside Tigard and used when needed. The issue of a restricted contribution has been raised with the Fund's Executive Director, Ramsay Weit. He has indicated that, although unrestricted contributions are preferable because of the greater flexibility they provide, the Housing Trust Fund could live with (and, in fact, already does so in the case of Hillsboro's donations) the tagging of Tigard-contributed dollars for Tigard-specific projects. If requested by Council, any money contributed by Tigard would be used to help seed affordable housing development in Tigard only. Tigard has been a strong supporter of affordable housing and County-wide leader in the affordable housing area. No other jurisdiction in Washington County and few statewide have affordable housing Fee Assistance, Tax Exemption, or Residential Housing Inspection Programs. This proposed modification to the affordable housing Fee Assistance Program would reinforce Tigard's leadership role and further address affordable housing needs in the City. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Allow the unrestricted use of City funds donated to the Community Housing Fund. CITY COUNCIL GOALS This agenda item does not appear to address a Council 2007 goal, but does address a Council-adopted program. ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment 1: "Letter from the Executive Director", CHF Notes, dated Fall, 2006. Attachment 2: Community Housing Fund. I:\L,RPLN\Council Materials\2007\G-19-07 AIS Amendment to Affordable 1-lousing.doc 2 FISCAL NOTES The City annually sets aside $10,000 in the Events and Social Services Fund to help reduce fees and charges on affordable housing development. The present proposal would not increase that amount, but instead would direct that any funds not allocated during a budget year would be contributed to the Community Housing Fund of Washington County. I:\LRPI N\Council Materials \2007\6-19-07 AIS Amendment to Affordable 1-lousing.doc 3 ATTACHMENT PAGE 2 CHF NOTES LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Ramsay Weit to hire a full-time Executive pre-development loans to the community. At the Welcome to the first of Director and a Resource take early conceptual plan- same time, we need to what we hope will be many Development Director in ning of a given project to put our donations to newsletters describing who October 2005. the point where conven- work so that we have a we are and what we've ac- tional financing is feasible. story to tell. That means complished since May 2003. "BUILDING THE CORPUS The most common uses for seeking out potential A little Community OF A TRUST FUND loan dollars are: securing partners whose mission is Housing Fund history may REQUIRES SUBSTANTIAL options on land, due dili- consistent with our own be in order. The Fund was CONTRIBUTIONS FROM gence, architectural draw- and finding ways to part- created by Washington THE COMMUNITY." ings, and attorney fees. ner in the creation of County in the spring of Terms of the loans are more housing. 2003 as an independent 501 flexible and the rates are Please let us know (c)3 non-profit organization The Fund has raised over low enough to serve as how you can help us cul- designed to identify and $800,000 in grants and friendly early financing for tivate the Fund and raise new sources of capital pledges and has committed deals that eventually will where you think we to assist the existing efforts some $175,000 to develop- involve multiple levels of might best invest our of non-profit housing devel- ment projects in the interlocking financing from assets to make a differ- opers in creating more units County, representing ap- various' sources. The CHF ence. We look to all sec- of housing in the county, proximately 300 units. dollars serve an additional tors of the county affordable to working fami- These projects are located in purpose as local match dol- faith, corporate, local lies and those with fixed and Hillsboro, Beaverton, Cor- lars for other funding government, individuals, very low incomes. An initial nelius, Tualatin, and Tigard. streams and demonstrate a and small business to working board of five estab- The cities of Beaverton and local commitment of dol- consider making a contri- lished the Fund's core oper- Hillsboro have both com- lars in statewide financing button. Together we will ating structure. mitted funding to the CHF competitions. build a permanent com- Initial fundraising cam- at the rate of one dollar per As you might expect, the munity asset in the Fund paigns, consistent with the resident per year, and success of the Fund de- to help guarantee housing business plan, drew support Washington County has pends on the breadth and choices for working fami- from the City of Beaverton, contributed $110,000 in its depth of our fundraising lies and those with Jim- Nike, Providence Health base budget. efforts. Building the corpus ited incomes in our com- System, and Meyer Memo- The Fund operates a re- of a trust fund requires sub- munity. nal Trust, allowing the Fund volving loan fund, making stantial contributions from 1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I Yes! I'd like to support the Community Housing Fund! ❑ I'd like to meet with a CHF staff person to learn more about the Fund. I 1 ❑ I'd like a CHF staff member to speak at my place of business, civic organization or house of 1 1 1 worship. Please call me to make arrangements. 1 I I ❑ I'm enclosing a tax deductible contribution in the amount of 1 1 1 Name Company or Organization 1 I 1 Address 1 I 1 1 Phone E-mail 1 1 The Community Housing Fund is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization. Donations are tax deductible to the full extent of the law. EIN 27-0049012 1 I_ Help Build Affordable ASampling of Our Housing Community Partners 1/We wish to make gift to the Community City of Beaverton Housing Fund in the amount of: • Central Bethany Development HOUSING ❑ $35 Community Partners for Affordable Housing :FUND Opp ❑ $100 ❑ $250 Housing Advocacy Group ❑ $1000 Inter-religious Action Network of Washington Co. ❑ Other: Meyer Memorial Trust Nike+ Today's Date: Community: This gift is in honor of: Oregon Foundation This gift is in memory of: Providence St. Vincent: Name: Medical Center ~ Organization: Y .t{. Southminster Presbyterian .s Address: Church City: State: Zip: Tualatin Valley Housing Partners Phone: Seabold Construction E-mail Address: Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of Washington Co., No. Unitarian Universalist Church of Hillsboro 3700 SW Murray Blvd. Community Housing Fund 3700 SW Murray Blvd., Suite 190 Suite 190 Suite 190 U.S. Bank Beaverton, OR 97005 Beaverton, OR 97005 503-643-5437 Vision Action Network I Phone: (503) 643-5437 503-846-5793 (fax) n Fax: (503) 846-5794 Washington County www.thecommunityhousing i4ndorg n www.thecommunityhousingfund.org = Washington Mutual m z N Community Housing 111IL1111ity Ns Responding to Con Fund Board of 7 Directors An Affordable Place A Strong Community Asset Larry Bowen to Call Home Clean and Sober Living The Community Housing Fund is a community- • Sheila Greenlaw-Fink A grant of $25,000 to Commu- based nonprofit organization that provides new Community Partners for Affordable Housing nity Partners for Affordable z' resources for proposed affordable housing pro- Housing, Inc. (CPAH) in support Tc Bill Haack jects for individuals and families living in of the rehabilitation of 84 units Rural Collaborative Washington County, Oregon. Our goal is to Roy Kim of housing for low-income resi- ~„~1 build a $10 million trust dents at Greenburg Oaks. Some Central Bethany Development fund to help local afford- $2.5 million will leverage this grant. David Randall-Bodman able housing experts build Bethel Congregational United Church of Christ or remodel 1,000 afford- A predevelopment loan for $25,000 for a 37-bed residential Steve Seabold j = able housing units during facility in Cornelius offering alcohol and drub>-free housing Seabold Construction the next ten years. Many to men re-establishing linkages in the community follow- Barbara Smith of these units will become ~r ing incarceration. The program will serve 150-200 men per KeyBank homes for low income =F working families strug- year and is the result of a partnership between Clean and Dana White gling to make ends meet Sober Living, Inc. (CASL), a Washington County-based Providence Health Systems and people with disabilities and special needs. nonprofit, and Washington County Corrections. Our Mission • A pass-through grant of $25,000 to Luke-Dorf, a Tigard based nonprofit organization, in support of the Washington Staff The mission of the Community Housing Fund is County Safe Haven, a ten unit resi- RamsaY Weit to combine public and private resources to cre- ate a new source of capital that will leverage the Executive Director financing for the construction and rehabilitation chronically homeless persons suffer- of housing targeted to serve people neglected by ing from mental illness. Kathy Andersen the mainstream housing market. Resource Development Manager • A predevelopment loan to Boys and Girls Aid Society to conduct design work and make option payments on land to v y enable the creation of transitional housing units for home- , J ` www.lhecommutiilyhousingjundorg ~Jtp~ less young people in Washington County. The Magic Kingdom Looks to Hit the Road - WSJ.com Pagel of 3 Y Cc/~ J 4(hA 1U0 l } FORMAT R 5t~CzIOE3G~ PRINTING WAU STREET JOURNAL sponsored by Don'tcopycloud.• ~ 1 THE aNL INE February 8, 2007 The Magic Kingdom I DOW JONES REPRINTS _ Looks to Hit the Road ( This copy is for your personal, + non-commercial use only. To order I presentation-ready copies for Walt Disney Co. Ponders distribution to your colleagues, Spinoffs of Theme Parks• clients or customers, use the Order ; Reprints tool at the bottom of any Pirate Resorts, Wine Tours { article or visit: I www.djrepdnts.com. By MERISSA MARR February 8, 2007; Page BI • See a sample reprint in PDF format. • Order a reprint of this article now. Ever since Walt Disney opened Disneyland in 1955, Walt Disney I Co. has rarely strayed from his original vision of what a theme park should be. But at a top-secret development unit these days, the company is plotting a new spurt of theme park expansion that goes well beyond its traditional model of luring people to Disney resorts in Florida or California. Disney is hatching plans to take its theme-park experience to the masses, rather than the other way around. Instead of building more big parks, the company is sketching out a string of niche resorts and attractions around the world. That could include such things as stand-alone, Disney themed hotels in cities and beach resorts, Disney branded retail and dining districts, and smaller, more specialized parks. In the near term, the company is using the Disney name to expand in other areas of the travel business. For example, it is ramping up an operation called " , "Adventures b Disney," in which travelers a for guided Disney tours to popular destinations including Italy and Ireland. The company also plans to build its r presence in time-share vacation homes in places like the Caribbean. And it is bulking up its popular cruise line, with more Disney ships in the cards. A sketch for a possible Disney-themed retail and dining district in an urban center, the project is an "Instead of saying where will the next Disneyland be, we idea and isn't planned yet. need to think more in terms of where around the world we can deliver an immersive experience appropriate to the size of the market," says Jay Rasulo, chairman of Disney's theme park and resorts business. "Not every market can support a full-on Disney location." The expansion comes after a long stretch of rebuilding in the wake of 9/11. Only recently has Disney's theme park business returned to the 20% margins seen before 2001. After the success of last year's global campaign pegged to the 50th anniversary of Disneyland, a big question has been what the theme parks will do next. http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB 117090283470501808.html 4/11/2007 The Magic Kingdom Looks to Hit the Road - WSJ.com Page 2 of 3 Mr. Rasulo says his strategy is aimed at tapping into a burst of growth in the travel market, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. Branching outside of Walt Disney's theme park vision isn't without risk. Disney has tried it before and in some cases, failed. It closed an indoor, interactive theme park project called Disney Quest in 2001 that drew sparse crowds in Chicago. Its children's play center, Club Disney, shuttered two years earlier after failing to sustain an initial burst of interest. Mr. Rasulo, who took over as head of the parks in 2002, says his division learned an important lesson from those ventures: they made the mistake of trying something that didn't already have an established consumption pattern. As Disney began thinking about a new strategy, it conducted research on why people go to Disney's parks. Among the conclusions: people wanted to experience Disney in places other than the parks. Disney set to work sketching out some ideas. One concept is to create stand-alone versions of the Downtown Disney dining and shopping districts or resorts like the BoardWalk at Walt Disney World, which includes a hotel, clubs, arcades and other entertainment. An alternative is building a resort around an attraction like an indoor water-park or a theme like pirates or princesses. Another approach is building a family version of a casino, without the gambling. A big focus will be Asia. Japan, for instance, has an insatiable appetite for everything Disney but already has two parks. While a third park in another part of the country is unlikely, adding a boutique attraction could theoretically be possible. One issue is how to avoid cannibalizing existing parks with such attractions. Disney says the goal is to give guests in new markets a taste of Disney with the hope of driving them to the bigger parks. With guests at the domestic parks visiting on average every four years, the thinking is that the smaller attractions will also serve existing guests between visits. Another challenge is tailoring the niche attractions to local markets while keeping the Disney brand intact, , something that has proved challenging with Hong Kong , Disneyland. Mr. Rasulo says there are no firm plans for any projects yet, with such ideas still in the conceptual or - "blue sky" stage. More concrete are plans for the cruise lines. Mr. Rasulo l_ says that business could double in the next few years, with a "few more cruise ships." Disney has been waiting Sketch of pirate-themed resort - one idea Disney for better contract terms and prices before going ahead is considering. with more ships, although it is likely to approve some soon. Disney Cruise Line now accounts for between 5% and 8% of the division's $10 billion annual revenue. After quietly experimenting in the guided-tour business, "Adventures by Disney" is meanwhile rolling out 12 itineraries in North/Central America and Europe, with two guides leading groups of up to 40 people. "It's not Mickey Mouse goes to the mountains," says Ed Baklor, who heads the Adventures http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB 117090283470501808.html 4/11/2007 The Magic Kingdom Looks to Hit the Road - WSJ.com Page 3 of 3 business. "Instead we're telling a local story with local characters." The "Spirit of America" tour of Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Williamsburg, Va., for instance, includes meetings with local characters like Benjamin Franklin. The trips also try to entertain both adults and kids: On the Tuscany trip, adults go on a wine tasting while kids do a gelato tasting. The "Adventures" project raises a question: if the tours don't feature Mickey Mouse, why will families want to go on them? Scott Lerman, CEO of brand consultancy Lucid Brands says a big part of what guests expect from Disney is "fantasy," rather than "authenticity" and "reality." Disney says it believes its selling point is offering a family vacation with the safety and quality of the Disney brand as well as Disney-quality guides. They argue the story doesn't need to be Disney to be "immersive." Mr. Baklor notes that each trip includes some Disney "magic." One of example of that is on the London/Paris trip, which includes VIP tickets to Disney's "Mary Poppins" stage show and a backstage tour afterward. Disney's time-share business, Disney Vacation Club, is also plotting new locations. Outside of Florida, the company may consider locations such as California, Mexico and the Caribbean, says Mr. Rasulo. It could take several years for such new ventures to really move the needle, however. Disney will work its traditional theme parks harder. It has a second, full-scale park in China in its sights. That won't happen before 2012, though. Recent changes in local government have slowed discussions in Shanghai, and Mr. Rasulo says they are "waiting to re-engage when a new government is appointed." Write to Merissa Marr at merissa.marr@wsj.coml URL for this article: hftp://online.wsj.com/article/SB1 17090283470501808.html Hyperlinks in this Article: (1) mailto:medssa.marr@wsj.com Copyright 2007 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB 117090283470501808.html 4/11/2007 Business Tax Rate Alternatives Pros/Cons Pros Cons Would generate a little over $357,000 per year, meeting the target of $350,000 to fund the operating budget of Small businesses and home-based businesses would pay Alternative #1 the new Commercial Crime Unit. an additional $95 per year. Although it maintains the current ranges within the rate Maintains the current rate structure of three ranges of structure, doesn't provide the flexibility for providing employees that businesses are now familiar with. some relief to the businesses with two or less employees. Would generate the necessary revenue ($353,000) to The 408 home-based businesses would still pay an fund the operating budget of the new Commercial Crime additional $20 per year and still be required to pay the Alternative #2 Unit. one-time home occupation permit of $39. Provides the flexibility to provide some relief to the small business and/or home-based business by expanding the rate structure to five categories. Businesses with two or less employees would only pay an additional $20 per year and that represents 57% of the registered businesses. Caps the larger business at $725 per year. Some may feel that home-based businesses should be The home-based business rate would remain at the $55 expected to pay the same rate as a small business with Alternative #3 per year. two or less employees. Still provides the flexibility as in alternative #2 to provide some relief to the small business by expanding the rate structure to five categories. Generates slightly less than the target of $350,000. Still caps the larger business at $725 per year. Same as alternative #3 but would require apartment complexes to pay a flat rate of by number of apartment units. Apartment complexes normally have a small number of employees but often generate more calls for Could have a direct impact on rents and, therefore, Alternative #4 service. impact those in the community that can least afford it. The additional revenue generated does not offset the greater need for administration by the need to verify Generates close to $365,000 annually. number of apartment units. Greater cost of administration by the need to verify No need for a range of rates categories, simple and actual number of employees rather than using a range of Alternative #5 straightforward. number of employees. Base rate of $100 very close to what the base rate would Two employee business would pay $120 per year versus be if the 1988 base rate was adjusted for inflation. $75 in Alternative 2,3, and 4. This alternative is supported by the Chamber of Washington Square Management is not in favor of this Commerce alternative, supports Alternative #2 or Alternative #3. Business Tax Rate Alternatives Pros/Cons Pros Cons Would generate a little over $357,000 per year, meeting the target of $350,000 to fund the operating budget of Small businesses and home-based businesses would pay Alternative #1 the new Commercial Crime Unit. an additional $95 per year. Although it maintains the current ranges within the rate Maintains the current rate structure of three ranges of structure, doesn't provide the flexibility for providing employees that businesses are now familiar with. some relief to the businesses with two or less employees. Would generate the necessary revenue ($353,000) to The 408 home-based businesses would still pay an fund the operating budget of the new Commercial Crime additional $20 per year and still be required to pay the Alternative #2 Unit. one-time home occupation permit of $39. Provides the flexibility to provide some relief to the small business and/or home-based business by expanding the rate structure to five categories. Businesses with two or less employees would only pay an additional $20 per year and that represents 57% of the registered businesses. Caps the larger business at $725 per year. Some may feel that home-based businesses should be The home-based business rate would remain at the $55 expected to pay the same rate as a small business with Alternative #3 per year. two or less employees. Still provides the flexibility as in alternative #2 to provide some relief to the small business by expanding the rate structure to five categories. Generates slightly less than the target of $350,000. Still caps the larger business at $725 per year. Same as alternative #3 but would require apartment complexes to pay a flat rate of by number of apartment units. Apartment complexes normally have a small number of employees but often generate more calls for Could have a direct impact on rents and, therefore, Alternative #4 service. impact those in the community that can least afford it. The additional revenue generated does not offset the greater need for administration by the need to verify Generates close to $365,000 annually. number of apartment units. Greater cost of administration by the need to verify No need for a range of rates categories, simple and actual number of employees rather than using a range of Alternative #5 straightforward. number of employees. Base rate of $100 very close to what the base rate would Two employee business would pay $120 per year versus be if the 1988 base rate was adjusted for inflation. $75 in Alternative 2,3, and 4. This alternative is supported by the Chamber of Washington Square Management is not in favor of this Commerce alternative, supports Altemative #2 or Alternative #3. Business Tax Rate Alternatives Pros/Cons Pros Cons Would generate a little over $357,000 per year, meeting the target of $350,000 to fund the operating budget of Small businesses and home-based businesses would pay Alternative #1 the new Commercial Crime Unit. an additional $95 per year. Although it maintains the current ranges within the rate Maintains the current rate structure of three ranges of structure, doesn't provide the flexibility for providing employees that businesses are now familiar with. some relief to the businesses with two or less employees. Would generate the necessary revenue ($353,000) to The 408 home-based businesses would still pay an fund the operating budget of the new Commercial Crime additional $20 per year and still be required to pay the Alternative #2 Unit. one-time home occupation permit of $39. Provides the flexibility to provide some relief to the small business and/or home-based business by expanding the rate structure to five categories. Businesses with two or less employees would only pay an additional $20 per year and that represents 57% of the registered businesses. Caps the larger business at $725 per year. Some may feel that home-based businesses should be The home-based business rate would remain at the $55 expected to pay the same rate as a small business with Alternative #3 per year. two or less employees. Still provides the flexibility as in alternative #2 to provide some relief to the small business by expanding the rate structure to five categories. Generates slightly less than the target of $350,000. Still caps the larger business at $725 per year. Same as alternative #3 but would require apartment complexes to pay a flat rate of by number of apartment units. Apartment complexes normally have a small number of employees but often generate more calls for Could have a direct impact on rents and, therefore, Alternative #4 service. impact those in the community that can least afford it. The additional revenue generated does not offset the greater need for administration by the need to verify Generates close to $365,000 annually. number of apartment units. Greater cost of administration by the need to verify No need for a range of rates categories, simple and actual number of employees rather than using a range of Alternative #5 straightforward. number of employees. Base rate of $100 very close to what the base rate would Two employee business would pay $120 per year versus be if the 1988 base rate was adjusted for inflation. $75 in Alternative 2,3, and 4. This alternative is supported by the Chamber of Washington Square Management is not in favor of this Commerce alternative, supports Alternative #2 or Alternative #3. Recap of Alternative Business Tax Rate Structure Goal: Generate an Additional $350,000 in Revenue Annually Additional # of Employees Revenue Revenue Home Based No Change in Rate Categories Businesses 0 to 10 11 to 50 51+ Generated Generated % of Businesses 408 86.43% 10.96% 2.61% Based on # of Current Rates Employees $55 $110 $220 $206,965 N/A Based on # of Scenario #1 Employees $150 $300 $600 $564,450 $357,485 # of Employees Expand Rate Categories b # of Employees 0 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 50 51+ % of Businesses 57.09% 16.83% 12.51% 10.96% 2.61% Based on # of Scenario #2 Employees $75 $100 $325 $525 $725 $560,150 $353,185 # of Emplyees Expand Rate Categories by # of Employees with Home Based Businesses Remaining at $55.00 0 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 50 51+ % of Businesses 57.09% 16.83% 12.51% 10.96% 2.61% Scenario #3 $55 $75 $100 $325 $525 $725 $549,340 $342,375 # of Employees Expand Rate Categories by # of Employees with Home Based Businesses Remaining at $55.00 and Separate Rental Unit Rates 0 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 50 51+ % of Businesses 57.09% 16.83% 12.51% 10.96% 2.61% Scenario #4 $55 $75 $100 $325 $525 $725 $572,077 $365,112 With Rental Unit Rates Per Unit after 5 Base Units A artment Rental Unit Rates $55 $5 Change Existing Rate Structure to a Base Rate Per Plus a per Employee Fee with a Maximum Fee Base Rate Employee Maximum Scenario #5 $100 $10 $850 $550,040 $343,075 Z Je xec ~U v /V re, ~pC Agenda Item # Meeting Date June 19, 2007 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue/Agenda Title Workshop: Briefing on the status of the proposal to create a Commercial Crime Unit and use an increase in the Business Tax to fund the new unit in the Police Department Prepared By: Chief Bill Dickinson Dept Head Approval: 14I City Mgr Approval:' ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the City Council give direction to staff to proceed with the creation of a Commercial Crime Unit in the Police Department and use an increase in the Business Tax for funding of the new unit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Direct Police Department and Finance staff to draft an amendment to TMC 5.04 (Business Tax) and a resolution amending the City's Fees and Charges Schedule changing the business tax and other related items. An amendment to the FY 2007-08 Budget would also need to approved by the Council to appropriate the new revenue so that spending authority would be established within the budget. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY At the April 10, 2007 study session of the City Council, staff presented a proposal to create a Commercial Crime Unit in the Police Department. Existing patrol officers primary task is to respond to emergency calls for service in the City. They follow-up on calls where there are clear leads and when time is available. Due to the number of calls for service, the amount of time available for follow-up is limited. The new unit would bridge the gap between patrol and the Detective Unit by responding and investigating reported crimes specifically in the business community. As part of the ongoing program, the unit would conduct commercial property surveys and develop various strategies to reduce crimes specifically in that segment of the community.. The proposal presented to the City Council included various rate structure alternatives that would generate close to an additional $350,000 annually to fund this new unit. At that time, the City Council gave staff direction to solicit input from various business community groups on the proposal. Formal presentations have been made or the information has been shared with such groups as the Rotary, Kiwanis, Chamber Business Advocacy Group, Chamber Board, Downtown Business Association, and Washington Square management. The overall response to the proposal has been favorable and there is no group that has expressed opposition. Staff has added an additional rate alternative as a result of input from one local businessman. A recommended rate structure will be shared with the City Council at the June 19 workshop. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Not pursue the creation and funding for a Commercial Crime Unit. CITY COUNCIL GOALS This would be part of the work items referred to in the 2007 City Council goals that would foster and create enhanced public safety. ATTACHMENT LIST Additional information will be presented to the City Council at the June 19 workshop. FISCAL NOTES The annual budget for the new unit would be approximately $350,000 and would be funded by an increase in the Business Tax. \VJg20NlnatpubWp20WmwrootVo=sVorm doesNeouncil agenda item summary sheet 07.doe Recap of Alternative Business Tax Rate Structure Goah Generate an Additional $350,000 in Revenue Annually Additional # of Employees Revenue Revenue 1 Home Based J No Change in Rate Categories Businesses 0 to 10 11 to 50 51+ Generated Generated % of Businesses 408 86.43% 10.96% 2.61% Based on # of Current Rates Employees $55 $110 $220 $206,965 N/A Based on # of Scenario #1 Employees $150 $300 $600 $564,450 $357,485 # of Employees Expand Rate Categories b # of Employees 0 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 50 51+ % of Businesses 57.09% 16.83% 12.51% 10.96% 2.610/6 Based on # of Scenario #2 Employees $75 $100 $325 $525 $725 $560,150 $353,185 # of Emplyees Expand Rate Categories by # of Employees with Home Based Businesses Remaining at $55.00 0 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 50 51 + % of Businesses 57.09% 16.83% 12.51% 10.96% 2.61% Scenario #3 $55 $75 $100 $325 $525 $725 $549,340 $342,375 # of Employees Expand Rate Categories by # of Employees with Home Based Businesses Remaining at $55.00 and Se arate Rental Unit Rates 0 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 50 61+ % of Businesses 57.09% 16.83% 12.51% 10.96% 2.61% Scenario #4 $55 $75 $100 $325 $525 $725 $572,077 $365,112 With Rental Unit Rates Per Unit after 5 Base Units A artment Rental Unit Rates $55 $5 Change Existing Rate Structure to a Base Rate Per Plus a per Employee Fee with a Maximum Fee Base Rate Employee Maximum Scenario #5 $100 $10 $850 $550,040 $3439075 i . ~ RY' rq L. yr a 1U17 7 fit" L a A. LD I ~ cra ~ CS GetCENTE Red Building Vibrant Dowrntowrns+ Main Streets Port Moody Centrally located in downtown Port Moody, Inlet Centre is the civic and community centre for this municipality of 25,000 residents. Inlet Centre provides access to shopping and a range of housing choices in a compact, walkable neighborhood. Newport Village is a fam- ily-friendly community that has a warm and inviting small-town feel, with just a touch of modernity. Housing choices range from high-rise apartments to low-rise condominiums. The SuterBrook community is rapidly making Port Moody one of the highest density centres of _ . ' the lower mainland. Inlet Centre's afford- able housing development is the first in Canada to integrate affordable housing for low- to moderate-income families, support- ive living for seniors and a hospice centre for terminally ill people. Centre residents, visitors and employees can take advantage 'C! of the new City Hall complex which includes 2 a library and theatre adjacent to the city's social and recreation centre. Within the cen- tre, the attractive storefronts, safe sidewalks and short travel distances between desti- nations mean many people walk to their local destinations. Inlet Centre balances the need to provide car access and parking with providing a safe, attractive pedestrian environment. Burnaby Co ultlam New Westminster North Vancouver Port Mood Vancouver Population 2001 193,954 112,89 0 54,656 44,303 23,816 545,671 Population 1996 179,209 101,82 0 49,350 41,475 20,847 514,008 Population change 8.2% 10.9% 10.8% 2.41% 14.2% 6.2% Age 0-19 22.2% 26.7% 18.5% 19.5% 28.4% 18.6% Age 20-44 40.7% 38.3% 42.8% 43.6% 40.0% 45.1 % Age 45-64 23.7% 25.2% 24.5% 23.9% 24.9% 23.5% Age 65+ 13.4% 9.8% 14.2% 12.9% 6.7% 12.9% Median household income $44.754 $52.657 S40.784 $44,095 $64,932 $42 026 Visible minorities Asian 43.8% 30.6% 20.8% 40.1% 16.8% 45.1% Black 1.3% 1.0% 2.0% 0.7% 1.2% 0.9% Latin American 1.6% 1.0*/. 0.6°A 1.51/0 0.7% 1.2% Legal marital status Single 29.356 25.9% 31.40/6 31.5% 23.1% 37.1 Married 41.7% 43.5% 31.5% 36.3% 44.7% 35.6% Divorced 5.7% 5.3% 9.7% 9.4% 5.7% 6.6% Household composition Married couple, with children 28.6% 36.9% 17.4% 53.8% 38.6% 19.6% Married couple, no children 25.3% 25.1% 24.4% 41.2% 26.9% 22.3% One person households 27.4% 21.1% 41.7% 25.6% 18.4% 38.7% Lone parents, with children 2.0% 11.4% 9.0% 14.6% 11.8% 9.7% Jobs b industry Agriculture/natural resource 1.5% 1.3% 1,9% 1.4% 1.5% 1.2% Manulacturin construction 14.8% 15.4% 20.30/6 113% 13.2% 11.6% Wholesale/retail trade 17.0% 19.3% 20.3% 16.4% 17.7% 13.7°A Finance/real estate 7.5% 7.4% 7.6% 8.9% 7.8% 7.9% Health/education 15.5% 17.5% 20.5% 15.8% 19.9% 17.9% Business services 24.3% 21.2% 28.3% 26.3% 21.9% 26.2% Other 19.4% 17.8% 21.4% 19.8% 18.0% 21.4% Land area 2000 (square miles 90.09 121.68 15.40 160.47 25.62 114.67 0 Persons per square mile 2000' 2,152.9 0 927.8 3,548.50 512.9 929.5 4,758.' t1 'ry City Center Development Agency City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of Posting In the Matter of the Notification of Consideration of City Center Development Agency On June 19, 2007, Agenda Item No. 7: CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss. City of Tigard ) I, mij 14 being first duly sworn (or affirmed), by oath (or affirmation), depose and say: , That I posted in ➢ Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon ➢ Tigard Public Library, 13500 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon ➢ Tigard Permit Center, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon A copy of said Notification of Consideration of City Center Development Agency June 19, 2007, Agenda Item No. 7 - CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS A copy of said Notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the day of - 1(& ja e- 320 . Signature of Person who Performed Notification Subsced and sworn (e~af£ed) before me this 14 day of .J LA 4C , 20 C7 7 . OFFICIAL SEAL j JILL AA BYARS Signa re of Notary Pu he for Oregon NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. 381793 ~lY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 14, 2008 a' City Center Development Agency City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of Notification In the Matter of the Notification of Consideration of City Center Development Agency June 19, 2007, Agenda Item No. 7 - CITY CENTER ADVISORYCOMMISSION (CCAQ PRESENTAT70N ON URBAN RENE IY/AL AND MARKE77NG AND COMMUNICAT70NS STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss. City of Ti and ) I, being first duly sworn (or affirmed), by oath (or affirmation), depose and say: That I notified the following people/organizations by fax : Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) Newsroom, The Oregonian (Fax No. 503-968-6061) and the following people/organizations by e-mail: Editor, The Regal Courier (Fax No. 503-968-7397) A copy of said Notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the /2 t day of 20 0 Signature of Person who Performed Notifi on Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me this 13 day of ~unc , 20 0- OFFICIAL SEAL ' JILL M BYARS Sign tore of Notary ublic for Oregon NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. 381793 lIi:C-( MISSION EXPIRES JUNE 14, 2008 TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JUNE 19, 2007 TIGARD CITY HALL TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD OR 97223 Notice The City Center Development Agency (CCDA) will have before it on the June 19, 2007, City Council and City Center Development Agency Meeting Agenda the following item for consideration: Agenda Item No. 7 - CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS Please forward to: ❑ Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, The Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) ❑ Newsroom, The Oregonian (Fax No. 503-968-6061) ❑ Editor, The Regal Courier (Fax No. 503-968-7397) The CCDA was reactivated by Resolution 05-32 on May 10, 2005, and will meet occasionally to address issues related to urban renewal. The CCDA, functioning as the city's urban renewal agency, will work on an urban renewal plan designed to facilitate the development and redevelopment of downtown Tigard and possibly other areas within the city. For further information, please contact Deputy City Recorder Carol Krager by calling 503-639-4171, ext. 2419. Deputy City Recorder Date: d~ Post: Tigard City Hall Tigard Permit Center Tigard Public Library ;;ji.uul City of Tigard ! 06/13/2007 11:21 FAX 5036847297 ~c>k TX REPORT x~ ' ~>k~~R~&~s:~Cffixexe~k~>K>E:acFe>K~~kffi& TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 2653 CONNECTION TEL 15033712635 SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID Valley ST. TIME 06/13 11:21 USAGE T 00'39 PGS. SENT 1 RESULT OK t. ' tiq I t{'' IF"' it•' i t it T s :t5 c, •rs •(`p q .~:.~Ys!'y i'jj Ar lj. r s • r i f (s• t { {(if f;•'s f{ ;};j77:.q,`'i 1N}fj.! G Y{ S si 1 . al~ 3 it c } ;.~jj '!•}}J((i'i'(i(~7~i?~SI! i!t 't{ij':i . • rt{1}!jl'. ~S, s• I i :1•:: t 11' i s i sis~i.4}t1(t{ s:1£ !Stn 1i i sli,(=.J. t!y ' : s n ,s .d i .}fin Itts'•' ii W9rt j;tit(~ :'I s.'3SFfts • ~i~ r i `H: ..i ~ .r ct tt { I>j 7u{~'~ i ~i L:!~It rt:;j }j:at(~tjtlu t« ssi; s'. i , ri t 'I h . L : a' Fi: a 1 , j i , i { ! ji• jai j'~..1• L ,r.Di._III ;jj.' F'•~!•'tj L C } ' • ' i is{ (1. irjrti} jl;' L'?i(t?li ~As ryi~ . si~': !.s fr s G : r • !•f' ,'iI, i t >x~t nrJr a: E L ~'e ~3s s s ~2:!!it 14 '~t:r t 4 p iSi u~ ....i . 7 Luj~{ lid [ ( lyi (j#js.~{ rt ya~ !~'j' ( !iij'!tn ` th(({{'t 7~{{S~~S~]]i' 'ss • . t :{t}.'i H..(#; }}~i?iii! i~ j:~idi•1'. ~t~{i~;itt{~ +;!I;f~ tIi f {'~~{N~i+`jJf~ij 3 { j4~~ ~ s{{i j .jj~}$s7( IiY' • •t~!Grs{t~ ~~t,,(;s1r{! li"' s tl'r tU K s sr s s• ~a s l :N•! t d' a ~j' s tt•` i ~ ~ •";~(j',c ~ l~; i.'u' i t~ ~en~d#st~r33!tl. {t!~j 1.,' .f , t i{ts i~ ~t:,!(1i tj S ~ t ~j~`~~ }j}Jil.!~ s~i9'~! F?{t ; i tfi•~ti17?j•tti: t• ~ r y i P 'rt'~{'•t li t s4~{{j~ ,~:.{•(lit•s' !i«~1! j7' G •s.{ ..e. 1•+ ~ ia~«~iF ih € ~p~fsi t ~j ss gti ~rj4: I F ii•!~ r Ri{i~? (ii~ ! " `~ti'8. i~ ` slj i[' ; t 1-S t{I i { !itr.'' " ~ c i'~' • t 7 t• i• art a •sast.ip i i q , !`}i?! s. rt i' • p , If i tr~ J~j ~ ~ t ~ ~''~+tt 1 I ti•il• a t( ij; t' t3 !j{{~.t~' ~{jll., ~•tiuiEi:, ~ 1 i.~,!,. r t ur .''.'!.F',.'4 t •j;(i,(ij 1.7"Si tl•s r t:i. t d• s3is t tmtr t it! is• drh t : • n ti C t.t t .r' P , 3 IN t .s a f .~.1 I~ • ~,iNi 1~ 4~3 i • t L',!~4i i • t 1{ . 'r.' !!~Jtit:?:~• ~ t,'~t! s[• j ii9. (S.,t~'.. L.. i, tt t..t~s~u;•'~at4/ss( 4r7!::r{ll!..r :?p 14 d .~ury ;t3ejiY({Spi f!1::~F !s«'i!' o s r s i. tfl~i t;(r N t;~~l('i:ll•.s.( ~"i~•j~~ {itl.lat~' Si: .i a ~tj:1:!it ~ •t • • r ~ ' iYi:i?!'~r•{'~ 1•e u sgi.(a. ~ `m '7 ~ ~ !,t!-d at+ji• tit} t•: j3 i,.} ~i4 ttlt•(f!SttY~aN ' ' ' .i . s .tj:' ' { s t}tl3';~t!~~Ii'' (Sj{{~~iitljf~L'f~i:~j: r~!j i!?(IHi; t tit 1: tit! I ~1'+:Sj'tF11t~,S1~(!i Isu{•• S~~i c j;? : r SrP r~ ; r t4s' s ~ a?fsi + a• i { •1:' • ~i 'R8. t .1 i f Notice The City Center Development Agency (CCDA) will have before it on the June 19, 20075 City Council and City Center Development Agency Meeting Agenda the following item for consideration: CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) Agenda Item No. 7 - PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS Please f0m atd to- • Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, The Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) ❑ Newsroom, The Otegonian (Fax No. 503-968-6061) ❑ Editor, The Regal Courier (Fax No. 503-968-7397) The CCDA was reactivated by Resolution 05-32 on May 10, 2005, and will meet occasionally to address issues and an urban other related to urban renewal. The CCDA, functioning as the city's bof a agency, Tigill renewal plan designed to facilitate the development and redevelopment areas within the city. 06/13/2007 11:20 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard Q001 ' ~e»~~x~~~xa~x>ka~e~>ic~s~s~><c>ic~~x>K TX REPORT ~kxe>1c TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 2652 CONNECTION TEL 5039686061 SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID Oregonian ST. TIME 06/13 11:20 USAGE T 00'35 PGS. SENT 1 RESULT • , tns;^'g - ! lil' E3~,w'L ~ K' cis s!t't~!.., (!~!E£i.'.~ , u»s.:. J s •:'3'Itut£1 (!Pi!}` y, }s£ iili;r`~ r i ~ : rtt:rs,' ELiI EL.d,ls r S•, r'•'~~t'r -t £t~Etp s , I14sL'i!! !I 1 ! EE ,r:lj ,Il(1~:t11i)jEI~. I~HNi:..l.,jfa,r' !u! iEl ; ~ ! j _ t, l ii ~ll.4t Ej•j~,.jn1,~Et ~t,r: rs• cs,iai ~ . , t 'jE I i . , J!Ail rl~s.lij ~ E{ cTi Ior L'G it• l~lj I ~c , ~ I'll l;:.j .a.E:ii- ;,n1.42 J..' 1 a •I • IIE~'(f! ' =s~('-+, sg. ,y„8~,,•s. d+?+x' ~ i EL1 { s . .i ,J;.:h_,!j[ E ( E il~:~,1r i' ii,='£~E:.. I rr, ci, i s rr E E 9 I• t. 1~rq, i'~r r • t:ir}:r{L !s'~slt{£iE~+,lt[ii ti ~ 't ~ s tl! it tE~ I r~.j i T,• fli!'!:SE~°E JE•{ ii+iiiii7:~.ri~:El 1••'.tj13~i, i~ sli, iElEliC ~•I'r p = rv t'+I ' r• I •.,t ...1 ,It ! VI ~,h~ j£I, r .;.r.! . J. j , n.:_. ~y u^ : !'ji• urur.{ i i • ~ i!3~E , t E !n , i 17lr ryt ~,T E• a xrjj;"rEi£ £ln `qE?• 1 , ' t•1 SEi=s~ 9iN~lg E IiE, r '~:li!!!i~ ! i~~'~.,~ sj{+l:£s£ s£ ~I'1= E,.. ~i;j iC+3f S hs=~ •r=I 1 I'q1 3~~' ' : i~!~ 'isil ~i{t,~=. rE ~'LE~13d't l~nE'l~li~~E 'L•{:~Fc•~;..is~ Ei.Jl:~ilfs'ELL' °pp ;lE Gs~!•... s r 't}jsi'4+1j. ~iE ~j~`li~'h^rt G~gpjCr , 5 NNEfilip, :v:: E, •:x ~ppr s.3C: ,~,+u (t~~(!!rt r•. t ,j (,l il,L 8 4•r l~s:r'•t s,>n :EE'i~'~c Ilgr~~~,• ~i t , '~h-y T'=,:~t't' ii t~`!i ~li:i}Ei~`1~ ,I ,i• 111 }l£ n( ~ =!'a,:a a. r• , tt r~ ~~~Ik~; r ~t ~ ~4 + , ~1'.E'la1fE r1' ~E'~ ail I"~: !i~ ! I • • ' " r ~t6 tE ° ,i•` t4 s~, ...s.j, 1. ar p iiA:1 fri s, Y L 15li;jcl~isss !N•E'•~ ElE1G% ~ Wi~tE ~~1~~N j t li ~1~€.~£ I l• ~'i j! ~ jujl 1E13 i~ "?j =i'' ~~£ij!iJ~u'ti E i.y~ ,e'"•1, pc~,jj i E EE~•_I i t t £:uj,!t I,~ly~il~u•1!s~ n iit!14:: s •3 ~ E ,.~Es s,; if i!JLE kliiSi; s ~E snCj ! Ei r{ , _ yu1~ t-1 •j • j, i 1, a L.?ii•rr, I 1 ~ ~ ..1•a£. i• t K + + •EG ° t ,t' y ]Ey~ III rit. ~ E ti i t•. I~li3 Eji+i hljjEij~l =tlEj~~;Ellii i 1r''~r''"i !''4 ( i r s ' s i' •i• I'I!+ i~ail~~E''''~jEFIi r£ 9i!. r:l:,:,••£~ ~f,!E ~ £t !k, : : ..'rE•• ;jl,£i~li N , h ~¢E't I'M H Notice The City Center Development Agency (CCDA) will have before it on the June 19, 2007, City Council and City Center Development Agency Meeting Agenda the following item for consideration: Agenda Item No. 7 CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS Please forvi-ard to: ❑ Barbar.L Sherman, Newsroom, The Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) ❑ Newsroom, The Oregonian (Fax No. 503-968-6061) ❑ Editor, The Regal Courier (Fax No. 503-968-7397) The CCDA was reactivated by Resolution 05-32 on May 10, 2005, and will meet occasionally to address issues related to urban renewal. The CCDA, functioning as the city's urban renewal agency, will work on an urban renewal plan designed to facilitate the development and redevelopment of downtown Tigard and possibly other areas withiltt the city. Page 1 of 1 Carol Krager - Tigard City Council Notice From: Carol Krager To: Editor@TheRegalCourier.com Date: 6/13/2007 11:35 AM Subject: Tigard City Council Notice Attached is a pdf of a Notice regarding the City Center Development Agency consideration of an agenda item at the June 19, 2007 Tigard City Council meeting. Please contact me if you need more information. - Carol Krager, Deputy City Recorder, (503) 718-2419 fileWC:\Documents and Settings\carolkTocal Settings\Temp\GW}000O1.HTM 6/14/2007 -7 - •l ~ A. ~/.-L'~ 4 1 1 L.L. "Stub" Stewart State Park WHAT:' Dedication Ceremony for LL. "Stub" Stewart State Park and Washington County Celebration Special Bcubecue for Washington Count'Officials and Volunteers WHEN: Ceremony begins at 9:30 a.m. € Barbecue from 11:15a.m. to 1 p.m. Saturday, July 7, 2007 yy r T 1yr..Si `:W r w.> i-m WHERE: Welcome Center area of Stewart State Palk; on Hwy. 47 North The Washington County Board'6f Commissioners is pleased to invite of Hwy 26, on the way to Vernonia (see map on reverse side). PARKING: Space will be limited opening you to a special celebration recognizing the ofL.L. "Stub" 13 at Stewart Park. We encourage 'ear pooling and using shuttle bus service State Stewart statepark in over 35years. ' special from area designated on map. MORE INFORMATION: Contact the 'bec ccuri mediately following the official dedication by Washington County Administrative Office at (503) 846-8685. [ M and Recreation I, artment 4;.. Our E lstii{gasrzrGNWN aturrclfor _S the G ~~`~(,TON COG 32~ County Administrative Office JIM 155 N First Avenue, Suite 300 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 OREGON Vemonia L.L. "Stub" Stewart Hare's 47 Canyon State Park Horse L.L. "Stub" Stewart Camp State Park Mountain Dale Cabin Village Celebration Banks 26 6 47 47 L.L. "Stub" Stewart State Park Entrance Park here for bus L.L. "Stub" Stewart service to event Maintenance Welcome Center Headquarters &EGO/V% Stub Stewart State Park Narurc Update June 12, 2007 HISTORY Disc- ry Location On east side of Oregon Highway 47 between U.S. Highway 26 and Vernonia in Washington County. Entrance is four miles north of U.S. 26-Hwy. 47 intersection, just north of Buxton and south of Hoffman Road. The U.S. 26-Hwy. 47 intersection is 31 miles west of Portland. Use More than 100 overnight sites and 15 miles of non motorized trails for hiking, horseback riding and mountain biking. The trails will connect all visitor areas and the 21-mile Banks-Vernonia State Trail, 3.5 miles of which run through the park. Most visitors will come to use the trails, appreciate nature and relax together as families and friends. As many as 225,000 day-users and 81,000 campers are expected to visit the park every year after development is complete. Size/geography 1,654 acres. Terrain is hilly and forested. Elevation at the park entrance is 730' above sea level. The horse camp is at 1,250'. The dominant geographical feature is Hares Canyon, which runs the length of the park. Five named creeks, including West Fork Dairy Creek along Highway 47, flow within the park's boundaries; the headwaters of several creeks, including Brooke Cr. and Williams Cr., are inside the park. How acquired Valued at approximately $7.5 million at the time of acquisition, most of the park land was acquired through exchanges with the Oregon Dept. of Forestry, Washington County, the Oregon Military Department, the Dept. of State Lands, the Oregon Dept. of Transportation, Longview Fibre Company and a private land owner. OPRD spent $320,000 in Lottery funds to help acquire land around the park. Historical/significant attributes • Hares Canyon was named for Joseph Coulson Hare, long-time Washington County resident who served as mayor of Hillsboro and operated a successful lumber business. • 3.5 miles of the 21-mile Banks-Vernonia State Trail runs through the park between its Buxton Trailhead, near the park's south end, and Tophill Trailhead, one mile north of park. The trail was the first "Rails to Trails" park built in Oregon under the 1983 National Trails System Act. • The campgrounds are the first built by the agency since Cape Blanco State Park opened in 1972. Development philosophy • Provide overnight camping for individuals and groups, and a system of day-use trails near the Portland metropolitan area; • Design facilities that harmonize with the park's natural setting; Preserve existing views of the Coast mountain range. • Build universally-accessible features so as many people as possible can enjoy the area. • Adhere to OPRD principles of sustainability (use recycled'and renewable materials, manage waste water on-site, use solar heating for restroom water, native plant landscaping). Facilities scheduled to open summer 2007 • Stub Stewart Welcome Center, including registration check-in window for campers, an interpretive display area and park offices. • Brooke Creek hike-in camp with 23 primitive sites, picnic tables, two restrooms, common area with fire ring; located'/2 mile from the Welcome Center. • Dairy Creek Camp West, the first of two campground loops, with 43 full-hookup (water, sewer, electric) RV sites and 12 walk-in tent sites. • Mountain Dale Cabin Village with 15 rustic-style cabins (12, 1-room; 3, 2-room). • Hilltop Picnic Area with parking for 35 cars and 10-15 RVs, modern restrooms and a trailhead for the park's trail system. Offers a panoramic view of Coast Range mountains. • Clay Hill equestrian staging and day-use area. • Hares Canyon Horse Camp, with 14 full hookup campsites with four-stall corrals and two double- size full hookup sites with six-stall corrals. Only horse camp in the state park system with RV hookup sites and fully-accessible shower-restroom. Day-use is $3 per day (statewide pass is $25 for 12 months, and $40 for 24 months). Camping rates includes lod in taxes : Oct. 1-Apr. 30 May 1-Sept. 30 Full-hookup RV sites 18 22 Walk-in tent sites 13 18 Hike-in tent sites 6 9 Cabins 39 39 Horse sites 18 single, 31 double 22 single, 40 double Future visitor facilities The park plan for the future includes: • Dairy Creek Camp East, with 35 more full-hookup RV sites (open by spring 2008). • Features for groups: group tent camping area., group picnic area with shelters, lodge at Mountain Dale Cabin Village. • Observation tower for sightseers at Hilltop Picnic Area. • More trails, including a single-track mountain bike trail. Design and construction OPRD contracted with CH2MHill of Portland for overall design and engineering services. Riverbend Engineering, Inc. from Drain, Oregon was the construction management firm. Contractors for road, building and utility construction included JAL Construction of Bend, Emery and Sons Construction of Stayton and Meng-Hannon Construction of Portland. Volunteers and community groups played a significant role in park development. Boy Scout Troop 146 helped with hiking trails, and Eagle Scout candidates helped at the hike-in camp by installing site numbers, community fire rings and picnic tables. The Portland United Mountain Pedalers (an affiliate of the International Mountain Biking Association), are helping design and build the upcoming single-track mountain bike trail, a first for the state park system. Oregon Equestrian Trails installed rails, chain gates and corral posts in Hares Canyon Horse Camp. The Rollin' Roamers Good Sam Club assembled about 100 picnic tables. OPRD volunteer park hosts helped landscape, construct wood and manure bins, install campsite numbers and trail markers, and finished the maintenance shop, Welcome Center and cabin interiors. Funding 2003-2005 biennium - $3.5 million in Lottery funds; $1 million from federal Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). 2005-2007 biennium - $11 million in Lottery funds and $1.1 million from LWCF. Rev. 6-12-07 GORDON H. SMITH COMMITTEES: OREGON FINANCE COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ENERGY RESOURCES United Mates senate INDIAN D ANATURAL AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20510-3704 RANKING MEMBER, SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING May 18, 2007 uopies ro• Mayor / Other: Councilors ~G City Manager Mayor Craig Dirksen Council Mail City Councilman Mayor's Calendar City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 1"car Mayor Dirksen: Thank you for taking the time to write me about subpoenaed Presidential adviser's. I always appreciate hearing from my constituents, and welcome this opportunity to respond. The United States Senate and House of Representatives have recently begun to issue subpoenas to administration officials. Although I am not a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and have no direct authority over subpoenas, I will keep your thoughts in mind should this issue be debated before the full Senate. Thank you again for taking the time to contact me. It is an honor and a privilege to serve you in the United States Senate. If I can be of further assistance on this or any other matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Warm regards, l7 i UTl~~-I. ~J1iI1 1`i United States Senate GHS:JT www.gsmith.senate.gov PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1d! Revised 6/18/07: Items 3 and 4 reordered; Item 5 Presenter added; and Exec Session added at end of meeting N~ TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY WORKSHOP MEETING r a ,~~ppp J, 10 une 19, 2007 6:30 p.m. J TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL. BLVD PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for. Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA 1, REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA -June 19, 2007 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING 6:301'M 1. WORKSHOP MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL WATER BOARD Staff Report: Public Works Department • Council Discussion 3. RECEIVE UPDATE ON HIGHWAY 99W CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 4. MEETING WITH OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION 1 MANAGER, JASON TELL Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 5. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM • Staff Report: Community Development Department • Presenter: Ramsey Welt, Community Housing Fund Executive Director • Council Discussion REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA -June 19, 2007 page 2 6. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON PROPOSAL TO CREATE A COMMERCIAL CRIME UNIT AND USE AN INCREASE IN THE BUSINESS TAX TO FUND THE NEW POLICE DEPARTMENT UNIT • Staff Report: Police Department • Council Discussion Recess City Council Meeting Convene City Center Development Agency Meeting • Call to Order • Roll Call 7. CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660 (2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9. ADJOURNMENT is \adm\cathy\ cca\2007\070619.doc REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA - June 19, 2007 page 3 © Revised 6/18/07: Items 3 and 4 reordered; Item 5 Presenter added; and Exec Session added at end of meeting CITVELOPMENT CY EETING T713125SW OUNCIL &r~ 6:30 p.m. w I t ® ` Y HALL LL BLVD PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda ite m should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA -June 19, 2007 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING 6:30 PM 1. WORKSHOP MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 6:35 PM 2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL WATER BOARD Staff Report: Public Works Department • Council Discussion 7:35 PM 3. RECEIVE UPDATE ON HIGHWAY 99W CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8:05 PM 4. MEETING WITH OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION 1 MANAGER, JASON TELL Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8:25 PM 5. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM • Staff Report: Community Development Department • Presenter: Ramsey Welt, Community Housing Fund Executive Director • Council Discussion REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA -June 19, 2007 page 2 8:40 PM 6. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON PROPOSAL TO CREATE A COMMERCIAL CRIME UNIT AND USE AN INCREASE IN THE BUSINESS TAX TO FUND THE NEW POLICE DEPARTMENT UNIT • Staff Report: Police Department • Council Discussion Recess City Council Meeting Convene City Center Development Agency Meeting • Call to Order • Roll Call 9:10 PM 7. CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660 (2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9:30 PM 9. ADJOURNMENT is\adm\cathy\cca\2007\070619.doc REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA - June 19, 2007 page 3 Carol Krager Fwd_ CC Agena Page 1 From: Cathy Wheatley To: Carol Krager Date: 6/15/2007 8:28:19 AM Subject: Fwd: CC Agena Carol - this is the info. I mentioned would be coming from Duane. We can put this on th "green" agenda so the Council will have Mr. Weit's name and that he'll be doing the presentation. Thanks, Cathy Cathy Wheatley, Tigard City Recorder 639-4171 Ext. 2410 NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS: cathy@tigard-or.gov Duane Roberts 06/14 3:40 PM Cathy, In the summary sheet for the 6/19 "Amendment to Affordable Housing Fee assistance Program", agenda item #5,1 neglected to mention that Ramsay Weit, Community Housing Fund Executive Director, will be present to briefly overview the fund and to answer any questions Council may have. Duane Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 duane(cD-tigard-or.gov 503-718-2444 Revised 6/18/07: Items 3 and 4 reordered; Item 5 Presenter added; and Exec Session added at end of meeting 1~ TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY WORKSHOP MEETING June 19, 2007 6:30 p.m. TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA -June 19, 2007 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING 6:30 I'M 1. WORKSHOP MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 6:35 I'M 2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL WATER BOARD Staff Report: Public Works Department • Council Discussion 7:35 I'M 3. RECEIVE UPDATE ON HIGHWAY 99W CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8:05 I'M 4. MEETING WITH OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION 1 MANAGER, JASON TELL Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8:25 PM 5. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM • Staff Report: Community Development Department • Presenter: Ramsey Weit, Community Housing Fund Executive Director • Council Discussion REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA - June 19, 2007 page 2 8:40 PM 6. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON PROPOSAL TO CREATE A COMMERCIAL CRIME UNIT AND USE AN INCREASE IN THE BUSINESS TAX TO FUND THE NEW POLICE DEPARTMENT UNIT • Staff Report: Police Department • Council Discussion Recess City Council Meeting Convene City Center Development Agency Meeting • Call to Order • Roll Call 9:10 PM 7. CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660 (2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9:30 PM 9. ADJOURNMENT is\adm\cathy\cca\2007\070619.doc REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA - June 19, 2007 page 3 5/25/2007 10:30 AM Executive Session - The Public Meetings Law authorizes governing bodies to meet in executive session in certain limited situations (ORS 192.660). An "executive session" is defined as "any meeting or part of a meeting of a governing body, which is closed to certain persons for deliberation on certain matters." Permissible Purposes for Executive Sessions: 192.660 (2) (a) - Employment of public officers, employees and agents, if the body has satisfied certain prerequisites. 192.660 (2) (b) - Discipline of public officers and employees (unless affected person requests to have an open hearing). 192.660(2) (c) - To consider matters pertaining to medical staff of a public hospital. 192.660 (2) (d) - Labor negotiations. (News media can be excluded in this instance.) 192.660(2) (e) - Real property transaction negotiations. 192.660(2) - Exempt public records - to consider records that are "exempt by law from public inspection." These records are specifically identified in the Oregon Revised Statutes. 192-660 (2) (g) - Trade negotiations - involving matters of trade or commerce in which the governing body is competing with other governing bodies. 192.660 (2) (h) - Legal counsel - for consultation with counsel concerning legal rights and duties regarding current litigation or litigation likely to be filed. 192.660 (2) (i) - To review and evaluate, pursuant to standards, criteria, and policy directives adopted by the governing body, the employment-related performance of the chief executive officer, a public officer, employee or staff member unless the affected person requests an open hearing. The standards, criteria and policy directives to be used in evaluating chief executive officers shall be adopted by the governing body in meetings open to the public in which there has been an opportunity for public comment. 192.660 (2) Public investments - to carry on negotiations under ORS Chapter 293 with private persons or businesses regarding proposed acquisition, exchange or liquidation of public investments. 192.660 (2) (k)- Relates to health professional regulatory board. 192.660 (2) (1)- Relates to State Landscape Architect Board. 192.660 (2) (m)- Relates to the review and approval of programs relating to security. is\adm\greer\tentatv ag\executive session topics - schedule\exec sess planning calendar.doc 5/25/2007 10:30 AM }t Revised 6/18/07: Items 3 and 4 reordered; Item 5 Presenter added; and Exec Session added at end of meeting TIGARD CITY COUNCIL CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY WORKSHOP MEETING June 19, 2007 6:30 p.m. TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA -June 19, 2007 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING 6:30 PM 1. WORKSHOP MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL WATER BOARD Staff Report: Public Works Department • Council Discussion 3. RECEIVE UPDATE ON HIGHWAY 99W CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 4. MEETING WITH OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION 1 MANAGER, JASON TELL Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 5. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM • Staff Report: Community Development Department • Presenter: Ramsey Welt, Community Housing Fund Executive Director • Council Discussion REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA - June 19, 2007 page 2 6. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON PROPOSAL TO CREATE A COMMERCIAL CRIME UNIT AND USE AN INCREASE IN THE BUSINESS TAX TO FUND THE NEW POLICE DEPARTMENT UNIT • Staff Report: Police Department • Council Discussion Recess City Council Meeting Convene City Center Development Agency Meeting • Call to Order • Roll Call 7. CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660 (2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9. ADJOURNMENT is\adm\cathy\cca\2007\070619.doc REVISED COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA - June 19, 2007 page 3 CENTER DEVELOPMENT [June GARD CITY COUNCIL & , AGENCY ORKSHOP MEETING 77" m) 19, 2007 6:30 p.m.'` CITY HALL TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BLVD PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (IDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA -June 19, 2007 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING 6:30 1'M 1. WORKSHOP MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL WATER BOARD Staff Report: Public Works Department • Council Discussion 3. MEETING WITH OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION 1 MANAGER, JASON TELL Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 4. RECEIVE UPDATE ON HIGHWAY 99W CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 5. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM • Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 6. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON PROPOSAL TO CREATE A COMMERCIAL CRIME UNIT AND USE AN INCREASE IN THE BUSINESS TAX TO FUND THE NEW POLICE DEPARTMENT UNIT • Staff Report: Police Department • Council Discussion COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA - June 19, 2007 page 2 Recess City Council Meeting Convene City Center De velopm en t Agen c y Meeting • Call to Order • Roll Call 7. CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9. ADJOURNMENT is \adm\cathy\ cca\2007 \07067 9. doc COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA - jme 19, 2007 page 3 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY WORKSHOP MEETING. June 19, 2007 6:30 p.m. i TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:3012.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please can 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (IDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (IDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA - June 19, 2007 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING 6:30 PM 1. WORKSHOP MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 6:35 PM 2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL WATER BOARD Staff Report: Public Works Department • Council Discussion 7:35 1'M 3. MEETING WITH OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION 1 MANAGER, JASON TELL Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 7:55 PM 4. RECEIVE UPDATE ON HIGHWAY 99W CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8:25 PM 5. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM • Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8:40 PM 6. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON PROPOSAL TO CREATE A COMMERCIAL CRIME UNIT AND USE AN INCREASE IN THE BUSINESS TAX TO FUND THE NEW POLICE DEPARTMENT UNIT • Staff Report: Police Department • Council Discussion COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA -June 19, 2007 page 2 Recess City Council Meeting Convene City Center Development Agency Meeting 0 Call to Order • Roll Call 9:10 PM 7. CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) PRESENTATION ON URBAN RENEWAL AND MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 930 PM 9. ADJOURNMENT is \adm\cathy\cca\2007\070G19.doc COUNCIL & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENGY AGENDA -June 19, 2007 page 3