City Council Packet - 06/17/2003
` oUtOL
.
V
,
RIP
h
7FIGA
P ME
HO,
Wo
i
June 1712Q03
ALL 140
4}
TING
NCIL.MEE
- ISEU
Jl
r A
CD
IO,
w'
4 ^
M Y}F"`' ~g4,1+E,~1~ r t'k r r rj. _
07,qs
AGENDA ITEM # .2J
FOR AGENDA OF June 17, 2003
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Residential Development Trends
PREPARED BY:_ Jim HendM DEPT HEAD OK ll~10, / Y MGR OK `Z L) 14 C
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Hear a report on current residential development trends in the City of Tigard and Urban Services Area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
N/A - informational item only.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Typical development occurring today is different from that of 10 years ago. Large lot development is no longer
the norm in the community. Staff will provide an overview of current residential development trends in the
City of Tigard and Urban Services Area.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
N/A
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE S'T'RATEGY
N/A
ATTACHMENT LIST
Attachment 1: June 3, 2003 memo to Council on development trends
Attachment 2: Urban Services Area Map
FISCAL NOTES
N/A
Attachment 1
CITY OF TIGARD
Community Development
Shaping A Better Community
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Jim Hendryx
DATE: June 3, 2003
SUBJECT: Development Trends
As you may recall, Community Development provided a department overview in
October 2002. During that presentation, the functional responsibilities for the dept were
identified, along with staff and their responsibilities. A key component of the
presentation was building and planning activity. Over the last year, approximately 400
building permits were issued for residential dwellings, with about half being built in
Tigard and the rest occurring in the Urban Services Area. The following charts include
information on residential building activity and valuation within Tigard and the Urban
Services Area for the last three years.
TIGARD
Residential # of Permits Total Valuation
FY FY FY FY 00-01 FY 01-02 FY 02-03
00-01 01-02 02-03
July 26 22 25 $4,504,314 $4,177,847 $4,492,905
August 45 29 26 $7,477,807 $6,849,537 $5,734,552
September 31 10 18 $5,489,176 $3,028,904 $5,028,598
October 24 30 30 $4,143,099 $6,051,226 $8,234,910
November 12 6 14 $2,873,045 $1,944,383 $1,537,602
December 21 11 16 $4,301,428 $2,949,806 $3,619,658
January 21 9 20 $4,305,712 $2,415,041 $5,107,000
February 24 19 24 $4,569,731 $5,621,339 $5,737,850
March 25 14 25 $5,105,870 $3,574,773 $6,147,455
April 48 16 28 $8,392,666 $3,610,274 $7,044,177
May 22 22 $3,878,895 $5,589,795
June 7 12 $1,967,251 $2,493,694
Totals 306 200 226 $57,008,994 $48,306,619 $39,385,926
1
Attachment 1
URBAN SERVICES AREA
Residential # of Permits Total Valuation
FY 00- FY FY FY 00-01 FY 01-02 FY 02-03
01 01-02 02-03
July 7 39 5 $1,309,795 $7,603,445 $1,553,665
August 7 26 15 $1,071,613 $4,752,606 $3,823,097
September 43 12 7 $6,150,432 $3,244,784 $1,978,841
October 30 11 4 $5,423,715 $2,855,661 $1,611,197
November 9 11 3 $2,176,376 $3,098,689 $778,800
December 10 8 9 $2,077,253 $1,924,537 $2,678,214
January 18 8 4 $4,436,800 $1,799,254 $1,180,364
February 14 12 6 $3,423,528 $3,084,107 $1,647,729
March 16 7 16 $3,959,764 $1,841,276 $3,765,769
April 25 22 9 $6,678,250 $4,611,605 $2,742,868
May 47 18 $9,146,733 $3,822,646
June 24 10 $5,172,295 $2,554,409
Totals 250 184 69 $51,026,554 $41,193,019 $21,760,544
As can be expected, residential construction is heaviest in the spring and summer and
slows in the fall and winter, reflecting our weather conditions. In 2000-01, average
valuations per home were slightly higher in the Urban Services Area as compared to
Tigard. This trend reversed in 2001-02 with higher average home valuations within
Tigard.
How do current building activities relate to long term trends? Chart 1 illustrates the
City's yearly construction levels since 1979. This information is formatted slightly
different from the two tables above and reflects residential, multi-family, and commercial
activity on a calendar vs. fiscal year. Information is not included for development
activity for the Urban Services Area since Tigard only started providing building and
planning services in 1997.
Over the last 20 years, on average, Tigard issued 270 single family residential and 150
multi-family permits per year. Obviously, there is significant variation from year to year
when viewing these numbers. The mid 80's were huge years for construction activity,
while the last few years have seen few multi-family projects constructed. Single family
` construction levels do not fluctuate to the degree of multi-family development. Multi-
family development activity is highly dependent to localized vacancy rates.
• What are the types of residential developments in Tigard and the Urban Services Area?
To answer this question, it is important to understand where development is occurring,
I what vacant lands are available, and how land use regulations affect development. The
following table indicates the various residential zoning classifications, minimum lot
sizes, and vacant acres within the City.
Zone Minimum lot size Total Vacate acres Tigard Vacant Acres
R-1 30,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size .4 .4
R-2 20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size 1.9 1.9
R-3.5 10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size 22.8 22.8
R-4.5 7,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size 273 261
2
Attachment 1
R-7 5,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size 450.5 104
R-12 3,050 sq. ft. minimum lot size 77.9 60.2
R-25 1,480 sq. ft. minimum lot size 47.6 44.5
R-40 40 units per acre 0 0
The most capacity for residential development is available in the R-4.5, R-7, and R-12
zones, the majority of which are partially developed (one home/large lot), resulting in
infill projects.
The community is building out. Tigard has approximately 675 acres of vacant or under
built residential lands. This number reflects vacant parcels and parcels that are partially
developed (with'/4 acre or greater that may be available for development). The total
acreage provides only a very general indication of building potential, as it includes
parcels that may have additional constraints, are too small for the indicated zoning, or
are fragmented.
The Urban Services Area includes approximately 350 acres of developable residential
land. These figures primarily include small parcels intermixed in developed
neighborhoods, typically referred to as infill lots. Large vacant tracts of land have
become a rarity and infill is the norm.
Land prices are approaching $225,000 - $300,000 per acre for undeveloped land.
Current land use standards require development to occur at a minimum of 80% of
allowed zoning density. For instance, in the R-7 zone, development must occur at 5
units per net acre to meet the minimum density requirement. These factors significantly
impact resulting development. At the present time, the City has 10 minor lot partitions
and 7 subdivisions (totaling 257 lots) under review. Common issues that come up
during review include compatibility, traffic, parking, and retention of trees.
As you drive through the community, you see detached single family development on
smaller lots, typically not much in excess of the allowable lot size for the particular
zoning district, e.g., 5,000 square feet in the R-7 zone. Also, attached single family (row
houses) dwellings are common, providing an attractive and affordable housing
alternative to the detached single family dwelling.
Typical development occurring today is different from that of 10 years ago. Large lot
development is no longer the norm in the community. Small lot development can be
seen throughout the community as developers are making efficient use of the remaining
vacant lands.
i
1
I
I
1
3
Attachment 1
Chart 1
in Altbrbtions 011.$ 0
A, It:e,ra 0
Ind ti
tta
iii
1979 241 292 533 17,347 17,534 34,881
1980 229 71 298 17,230 11,62 28,854
1981 184 5 189 11,391 6,439 17,830
1982 117 0 117 13,344 6,117 19,461
1983 231 10 241 17,937 3,194 20,591
1984 175 34 209 15,889 3,053 18,942
1985 283 338 621 28,473 6,818 35,291
1986 415 126 541 32,863 11,804 44,667
1987 372 286 658 36,533 20,601 57,134
1988 297 229 526 30,333 24,364 54,697
1989 289 386 675 34,885 24,887 59,772
1990 303 287 317 40,013 18,133 58,146
1991 176 0 176 20,942 27,951 48,893
1992 298 0 298 32,130 20,375 52,505
1993 451 298 749 65,906 58,064 123,970
1994 344 108 452 54,042 38,022 92,064
1995 338 154 492 60,414 32,095 92,509
1996 409 479 888 94,223 41,763 135,986
1997 233 150 383 58,304 34,127 92,431
1998 169 8 177 31,728 39,267 70,995
1999 149 144 293 64,893 31,557 96,450
2000 252 0 252 87,697 61,195 148,892
2001 258 26 284 94,619 45,860 140,479
2002 221 0 221 59,131 15,585 74,716
2003 44 0 44 11,746 2,110 13,856
(2/03)
Source: 1999 Tigard Database; Building Department Annual Reports and Monthly Totals
(2003 Tigard Almanac)
z
i
i
i
i
I
I
4
ST~►~ ~tgard Urban p
o~
LEG1~►L►T'~
Sefv►ce ACea
F.;t~ hfit'~ 7
r+
.o un N
t~~Ar
yi pat
C
W ~
7,~+n
fiat iaatr.
YS~ Vlt t,y+'it
f 1 q ,s;a Eai itr
~j.tF r..+T..
ti4~sKacS Cr'tEr, w
w. ^
~Qg{ ~ ~ ~ ryt~us er ~ -
s ra
i G }
to
.Ofi S~ ,TlR ~ l~ o
J,
~w A•t
~ .11t 4U7
aHN~ ;
1
i.aa1 O D'att
T~ - Atli r,%7a •ta1M~.,v.r.
ff rr ~ ~ HnMi~~„~ 1* N~~t,w
ttta ~ qtr wl".
,ese ~ ~tl~ ~itt%
Agenda Item No.: 3
Meeting of: June 17, 2003
Discussion on the
Tigard Festival of Balloons
Councilor Moore will be updating the City Council on planning
efforts for the 2004 Balloon Festival.
There are no packet materials for this item.
For more information, contact the City Recorder's Office at
503-639-4171
AGENDA ITEM #
FOR AGENDA OF June 17, 2003
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Master Fees and Charges Schedule and the Updating of Certain Fees.
PREPARED BY: Michelle Wareing DEPT HEAD OK __C k CITY MGR OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
City Council to consider staff recommendations to update the Master Fees and Charges Schedule and amend
certain fees.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Council review and discuss Master Fees and Charges Schedule with updates as presented.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 3.32.050 requires that the City Council review fees and charges annually. On
January 22, 2002, the City Council adopted the Master Fees and Charges Schedule, which contains all citywide
fees and charges, to streamline the review process and minimize the number of resolutions and ordinances relating
to fees and charges.
Staff has reviewed the Schedule and proposed changes to specific fees and charges. There are various reasons for
the proposed changes. Several of the fees are either adjusted annually by previously approved formula or set by
other agencies. Other fees are no longer adequately recovering the City's cost to provide services. Finally, some
fees are related to services and/or permits that the City no longer provides or are redundant within the Schedule.
Below is a summary of proposed fee changes.
• Citywide Audiotape Fee and Fax Fee - based on State Archives fee and actual City costs.
• Amplified Sound Event Permit - no longer provided due to noise ordinance update.
• Commercial Mechanical Fees - not recovering costs.
[ • Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee and Service Fees - set by Clean Water Services.
• Public Facility Improvement Permit Fee - combines Compliance Agreement Permit (CAP) and
Street Opening Permit (SOP) into one permit type and fee; no change in fee amounts.
• Room Reservation Fees - not recovering costs.
j • Court Fees and Costs - set by Municipal Court Judge; updated on April 10, 2003 by Order 03-19.
• City Records Photocopy Fee - redundant; already listed in Citywide Fees Section.
• City Records Audiotape Fee - redundant; already listed in Citywide Fees Section.
• City Records Fax Fee - redundant; already listed in Citywide Fees Section.
• City Records Research/Labor Fee - redundant; already listed in Citywide Fees Section
e Lost Library and Overdue Items Fees - set by Washington County Cooperative Library System.
• False Alarm Charge - not recovering costs.
• Police Photograph Copy Fee - not recovering costs due to change in process.
• City of Durham Contract - not a fee or charge; should not be listed.
• Park Reservation Fees - not recovering costs.
• Park System Development Charges (SDCs) - adjusted annually in January based on a formula
previously approved by Council.
• Traffic Impact Fee Trip Rates - set by Washington County.
Planning fees are not included in this update as they are to be adjusted annually based on the June Engineering
News Record (ENR) Index for the City of Seattle (the Seattle ENR is the closest index for the Portland
Metropolitan Area). This index will not be available until July, so Planning fees will be updated by amending the
Master Fee Resolution next month.
Staff will review all proposed fee changes with Council to obtain feedback and direction. This review will include
the second draft of the proposed Park Reservation fee changes first reviewed by Council on May 27. Staff will
incorporate any changes directed by Council into the final version of the Master Fee Resolution and will present
that resolution to Council for approval at the June 24, 2003 Council meeting.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not update fees and charges as recommended or update at different amounts.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
None
ATTACHMENT LIST
Master Fees and Charges Schedule Draft
Park Reservation Fees Memo
Mechanical Fees Memo
FISCAL NOTES
There are no additional costs attached to these changes. These increases in fees and charges are not reflected in
the FY 2003-04 Adopted Budget.
Actual revenues received, for some of the fees listed above, so far in FY 02/03 as of April 30, 2003 are as
follows:
Commercial Mechanical Fees - $62,257
1
1 Sanitary Sewer Connection - $150,100
Sanitary Sewer Service - $1,270,077
Room Reservation - $7,517
Library Fines - $48,654
Park Reservation - $13,992
Park SDCs - $303,227
Traffic Impact Fees for Tigard & Urban Services Area - $1,209,009
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Dan Plaza, Parks Manager
RE: Recommendation to Increase Fees and Charges
DATE: June 3, 2003
Background
As you know it has been ten years since the application fee and rental rates for park
reservations (picnic shelters and fields) have been raised. They were last raised on
December 8, 1992 (Council Resolution #92-57). The cumulative CPI has increased over
32% percent since then. Current revenues generated by fees and charges cover less than
a third of the program costs. Approximately $69,000 needs to be recovered to pay for
current costs associated with the program (see attached).
Staff developed a fee proposal and presented it to Council on May 27, 2003. Council
supported the idea of increasing the Parks Reservation Fee, but questioned elements of
the staff proposal. Council directed staff to revise the initial draft to develop additional
alternatives for the June 17 workshop meeting. This memo presents three additional
alternatives.
Current Fees and Charges Schedule
Administration Fee $10.00
Resident/Non-Profit Rates
Groups up to 50 $6.00/hour
51-100 $8.00/hour
101-150 $15.00/hour
's 151-200 $20.001hour
201-250+ $25.00/hour
Non-Resident Rates'(double the resident fee)
r Groups up to 50 $12.00/hour
51-100 $16.00/hour
101-150 $30.00/hour
151-200 $40.001hour
201-250+ $50.00/hour
7
Current Fees and Charges Schedule (continued)
Soccer/fields Rentals
Resident/Non-Profit $4.00/hour
Non-Resident $8.00/hour
The Goal
At the May 27 workshop, Council directed staff to propose various rate schedules that
would:
1) recover between 50% and 70% of costs,
2) maintain a reduced rate of 50% for resident users,
3) reduce the application fees proposed at the May 27 workshop, and
4) increase the hourly rates proposed at the workshop.
Recommended Fees and Charges Schedule
Staff has developed three scenarios aimed at recovering 50% to 70% of costs.
It should be noted that each of the three proposed rate schedules charge Tigard residents
50% less than non-residents.
Once an approved three-year cost recovery schedule phase-in is accomplished (see
attached), it is anticipated that future rate adjustments would be tied to annual inflationary
factors, and thus be nominal.
An additional benefit of the three-year phase-in is it allows staff to analyze if rental rates are
negatively affecting the number of yearly reservations. It is anticipated that an annual
analysis of this factor would be completed, and if it is apparent that the rate schedule is
negatively affecting total rental opportunities it may be necessary to amend the schedule.
2
The following tables indicate the proposed rate changes over the next three-years, and
show estimated costs and revenues. These rate tables maintain the principle of a 50%
reduction for resident users.
TABLE 1 RECOVER 50% OF PROGRAM COSTS
Effective Effective Effective
Current 01/01104 01/01/05 01/01/06
Administrative/Application
Fee
Resident/Non-profit 10.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Non-resident 10.00 40.00 40.00 40.00
Picnic Shelter Rental
Resident/Non-profit
Groups up to 50 6.00/hour 7.00 8.00 8.50
51 - 100 8.00/hour 9.00 10.00 10.50
101-150 15.00/hour 16.00 17.00 17.50
151 -200 20.00/hour 21.00 22.00 22.50
201+ 25.00/hour 26.00 27.00 27.50
Non-resident
Groups up to 50 12.00/hour 14.00 16.00 17.00
51 - 100 16.00/hour 18.00 20.00 21.00
101-150 30.00/hour 32.00 34.00 35.00
151 -200 40.00/hour 42.00 44.00 45.00
201+ 50.00/hour 52.00 54.00 55.00
Soccer/Field Rentals
Resident/Non-profit 4.00/hour 4.50 5.00 5.25
Non-resident 8.00/hour 9.00 10.00 10.50
Program Cost $69,000 $71,070 $73,202 $75,398
50% Recovery Revenues $24,700 $34,732 $37,324 $38,620
(Estimated)
3
TABLE 2 RECOVER 60% OF PROGRAM COSTS
Effective Effective Effective
Current 01/01104 01101/05 01/01/06
Administrative/Application Fee
Resident/Non-profit 10.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Non-resident 10.00 40.00 40.00 40.00
Picnic Shelter Rental
Resident/Non-profit
Groups up to 50 6.00/hour 10.00 10.50 11.00
51 - 100 8.00/hour 12.00 12.50 13.00
101-150 15.00/hour 19.00 19.50 20.00
151 - 200 20.00/hour 24.00 24.50 25.00
201+ 25.00/hour 29.00 29.50 30.00
Non-resident
Groups up to 50 12.00/hour 20.00 21.00 22.00
51 - 100 16.00/hour 24.00 25.00 26.00
101-150 30.00/hour 38.00 39.00 40.00
151 - 200 40.00/hour 48.00 49.00 50.00
201+ 50.00/hour 58.00 59.00 60.00
Soccer/Field Rentals
Resident/Non-profit 4.00/hour 5.50 5.75 6.00
Non-resident 8.00/hour 11.00 11.50 12.00
Program Cost $69,000 $71,070 $73,202 $75,398
60% Recovery Revenues $24,700 $42,507 $43,803 $46,576
C
i
i
i
i
4
TABLE 3 RECOVER 70% OF PROGRAM COSTS
Effective Effective Effective
Current 01/01/04 01/01/05 01/01/06
Administrative/Application Fee
Resident/Non-profit 10.00 20.00 20.00 22.50
Non-resident 10.00 40.00 40.00 45.00
Picnic Shelter Rental
Resident/Non-profit
Groups up to 50 6.00/hour 12.00 13.00 14.00
51 - 100 8.00/hour 14.00 15.00 16.00
101-150 15.00/hour 21.00 22.00 23.00
151 - 200 20.00/hour 26.00 27.00 28.00
201+ 25.00/hour 31.00 32.00 33.00
Non-resident
Groups up to 50 12.00/hour 24.00 26.00 28.00
51 - 100 16.00/hour 28.00 30.00 32.00
101-150 30.00/hour 42.00 44.00 46.00
151 - 200 40.00/hour 52.00 54.00 56.00
201+ 50.00/hour 62.00 64.00 66.00
Soccer/Field Rentals
Resident/Non-profit 4.00/hour 6.00 6.50 6.75
Non-resident 8.00/hour 12.00 13.00 13.50
Program Cost $69,000 $71,070 $73,202 $75,398
70% Recovery Revenues $24,700 $47,690 $50,282 $54,351
What's Next
Council will decide what percent of recovery fee schedule to implement. This item will be
incorporated into the master fees and charges schedule which Council will be adopting on
June 24.
5
e
CITY OF TIGARD
Community Development
Shaping A Better Community
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Gary Lampella
DATE: June 3, 2003
SUBJECT: Mechanical Fee Increase
Background
The Building Division is self-supported by a dedicated fund. All permit revenues are used to
support the operations and functions of the plumbing, electrical, structural and mechanical
programs. These fui ids in turn cover the direct costs of operation which include inspectors' and
plans examiners' wages and benefits, vehicles, supplies, and other costs required to perform their
job. These funds are also used to cover administrative costs for the counter staff, the Building
Official, supervising inspector and other administrative positions. Additionally, indirect overhead
charges for services provided by other departments such as CD Administration, Finance, Human
Resources, Risk and Network Services are paid through these fees.
The Building Division has proposed a fee increase for the commercial mechanical program. During
the fee increase of FY 2000-01, it was recognized that the commercial mechanical program would
need to be increased approximately 160% to fully cover the cost of the program. The fee increase
was proposed at 45% with the understanding that the City would review the fees at a later date to
L determine the need for another increase. Staff has re-analyzed the mechanical program since the
2 last increase and determined that it is being subsidized by the commercial structural program. This
o proposed mechanical fee increase is necessary for cost recovery to the extent the City feels is
reasonable.
i
Due to Senate Bill 512, mechanical fees were required to be calculated the same in each
jurisdiction in the Tri-County area. The City's calculation changed from an appliance based
schedule (number of furnaces, vent fans, etc.) to calculating fees based on the dollar valuation of
the work being performed. When the City made this change, the permit cost was to remain fee
neutral with no increase. In order to accomplish this, we had to develop a means to convert each
appliance to a valuation and have the permit cost be the same. Staff has proposed dropping this
appliance conversion table and simply take the applicant's valuation as a base for determining fees
with a new valuation table.
i
Fee Proposal
Staff has proposed the largest increase at the lower end of the valuation table where most of the
plan review and inspections fall. It amounts to approximately a 61 % increase for up to $10,000 in
valuation and the percentage drops when the valuation increases.
Staff has looked at fees for neighboring jurisdictions of approximately the same size and/or
providing the same level of service such as Beaverton, Portland, Tualatin, Gresham, Washington
County and Lake Oswego. The proposed fees are comparable to the fees they charge for the
same service. Staff based the increase on the number of inspections, the time it takes for plan
review and the administrative cost of creating and issuing the permit. On a typical rooftop HVAC
unit, staff performs approximately 3.5 inspections taking into consideration re-inspections. Staff
has determined that it costs approximately $45.00 per inspection which includes the inspector's
wages, travel time between inspections, and data entry and filing inspection reports for a total of
approximately one hour per inspection plus administrative overhead.
The plan review fees cover the costs associated for the time the plans examiner spends on the
review. They also cover the cost for permit issuance and other associated administrative costs to
the Building Division.
Permit Fees
According to mechanical contractors staff talked with, the cost for installing three roof top HVAC
units is about $5,000. Based on the current valuation table shown below, the valuation would be
$3,870. Apply this to the fee table and the permit fee is $72.50. Multiply 3.5 inspections by $45.00
(the actual cost per inspection) and the actual cost is approximately $157.00. Apply the
contractor's valuation to the proposed table and the permit fee would be $141.50. This is still a
little under the actual cost, but will balance out with some of the larger projects.
On larger projects such as Haggen's, they may install 6 or 7 units on the roof with kitchen
equipment inside. A rough estimate of a project of this size may require 10-15 inspections. In that
case, the valuation per the City's table would be in the $10,000 to $15,000 range. This would
generate a permit fee of $148.50 to $225.50. The actual cost for this would be in the $450.00 to
$675.00 range. If we took the contractor's valuation of $40,000, we would have received about
$636.00 for the inspections.
Plan Review Fees
The plan review fees are calculated at 25% of the permit fee. Calculating the plan review fee for
three rooftop units using the current table, we get a fee of $18.13. It takes on the average about 30
minutes to review a submittal like this to determine code compliance. Using the proposed fee
schedule for the same three rooftop units, the plan review fee would be about $35.00 which would
cover the wages and permit issuance costs. Using the current fee table for the Haggen's example
above, the City would receive between $37.00 to $56.00. If we calculate the plan review fee using
the proposed fee based on this same permit, we would receive around $159.00. The Haggen's
example would be a more detailed review that may entail several hours of review based on the
complexity, code compliance issues and subsequent plan reviews when additional information is
required.
2
Assumed: Vsilluatlgns.PerAppYianc~
Value (Ea) Total
Description: Qty Amount
Furnace to 100,000 BTU, including ducts & vents 955
Furnace > 100,000 BTU including ducts & vents 3 1,170 $3,510
Floor furnace including vent 955
Suspended heater, wall heater or floor mounted 955
heater
Vent not included in appliance permit 445
Repair units 805
< 3 hp; absorb. unit, 955
to 100k BTU
3-15 hp; absorb. unit, 1,700
101k to 500k BTU
15-30 hp; absorb. unit, 501k to 1 mil. BTU 2,310
30-50 hp; absorb. unit, 3,400
1-1.75 mil. BTU
>50 hp; absorb. unit, 5,725
>1.75 mil. BTU
Air handling unit to 10,000 cfm 656
Air handling unit >10,000 cfin 1,170
Non-portable evaporate cooler 656
Vent fan connected to a single duct 446
Vent system not included in appliance permit 656
Hood served by mechanical exhaust 656
Domestic incinerator 1,170
Commercial or industrial incinerator 4,590
Other unit, including wood stoves, inserts, etc. 656
Gas piping 1-4 outlets 3 360 $360
Each additional outlet 63
TOTAL COMMERCIAL VALUATION: $3,870
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES - CITY OF TIGARD
Mechanical Permit Fees (Commercial and Multi-family)
Total Valuation:
$1 - $5,000.00 Minimum $72.50
$5,001.00 - $10,000.00 $72.50 for the first $5,000 and $1.52 for each additional
$100 or fraction thereof,
$10,001.00 - $25,000.00 $148.50 for the first $10,000 and $1.54 for each additional
$100 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.
$25,001.00 - $50,000.00 $379.50 for the first $25,000 and $1.45 for each additional
$100 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.
$742.00 for the first $50,000 and $1.20 for each additional
$50,001.00 and up $100 or fraction thereof.
Plan Review 25% of permit fee
3
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE (Effective Date: August 1, 2003)
MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES - CITY OF TIGARD
Mechanical Permit Fees
(Commercial and Multi-Family)
Total Valuation:
$1 - $2,000.00 Minimum $72.50
$2,001.00 - $5,000.00 $72.50 for the first $2,000.00 and $2.30 for each additional
$100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $5,000.00
$5,001.00 - $10,000.00 $141.50 for the first $5,000.00 and $1.80 for each additional
$100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $10,000.00
$231.50.00 for the first $10,000.00 and $1.35 for each
$10,001.00 - $50,000.00 additional
$100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00
$50,001.00 - $100,000.00 $771.50 for the first $50,000.00 and $1.25 for each additional
$100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00
$1,396.50 for the first $100,000.00 and $1.10 for each
$100,001.00 and up additional $100.00 or fraction thereof.
Plan Review 25% of permit fee
Fee Comparisons
Washington County
Total Valuation
$1-$2,000 $100
$2,001 - $25,000 $100 for the first $2,000 and $11.75 for each additional $1,000 or
fraction thereof, to and including $25,000
$25,001 - $50,000 $370.25 for the first $25,000 and $9.25 for each additional $1,000
or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000
C $50,000 - $100,000 $601.50 for the first $50,000 and $6.00 for each additional $1,000
or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000
i $100,001 and up $901.50 for the first $100,000 and $4.75 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof
Plan Review 95% of Permit Fee
4
City of Beaverton
Total Valuation
$0-$500 $47.80
$501 - $5,000 $47.80 for the first $500 and $2.10 for each additional $100 or
fraction thereof
$5,001 - $10,000 $142.30 for the first $5,000 and $1.95 for each additional $100 or
fraction thereof
$10,001 - $50,000 $239.80 for the first $10,000 and $1.80 for each additional$100
or fraction thereof
$50,000 - $100,000 $959.80 for the first $50,000 and $1.75 for each additional$100
or fraction thereof
$100,001 and up $1,834.80 for the first $100,000 and $2.00 for each
additional$1,000 or fraction thereof
Minimum Fee $67.50
Plan Review 25% of Permit Fee
City of Portland
Total Valuation
$1-$1,000 $35.00
$1,001 - $10,000 $35.00 plus $1.78 for each additional $1,000 over $1,000
$10,001 - $100,000 $195.20 plus $10.98 for each additional $1,000 over $10,000
$100,001 and above $1,183 plus $10.98 for each additional $1,000 over $100,000
Plan Review Fee 60% of Permit Fee
City of Tualatin
Total Valuation
$1-$500 $11.50
$501 - $2,000 $11.50 for the first $500 plus $1.73 for each additional $100 or
Q, portion thereof
Z
j~ $2,001 - $25,000 $37.50 for the first $2,000 plus $6.90 for each additional $1,000
or portion thereof
$25,001 - $50,000 $196.15 for the first $25,000 plus $5.18 for each additional
$1,000 or portion thereof
9
u
1 $50,001 - $100,000 $325.65 for the first $50,000 plus $3.45 for each additional
$1,000 or portion thereof
$100,001 and up $498.15 for the first $100,000 plus $2.98 for each additional
$1,000 or portion thereof
Plan Review Fee 65% of Permit Fee
5
City of Lake Oswego
Total Valuation
$1-$10,000 $40.25 plus $1.35 for each additional $100 over $1,000
$10,001 - $100,000 $253.00 plus $8.30 for each additional $1,000 over $10,000
$100,001 and up $1,560.00 plus $5.70 for each additional $1,000 over $100,000
Plan Review Fee 33% of Permit Fee
City of Gresham
Total Valuation
$1-$1,000 $28.00
$1,001 - $10,000 $28.00 plus $1.62 for each additional $100 over $1,000
$10,001 - $100,000 $173.80 plus $9.96 for each additional $1,000 over $10,000
$100,001 and up $1,070.20 plus $6.80 for each additional $1,000 over $1,000
Plan Review Fee 65% of Permit Fee
Fee Comparisons
Permit Fees
Valuation Tigard Wash. Co. Beaverton Portland Tualatin Lake Oswego Gresham
$5,000 $141.50 $135.25 $142.30 $106.20 $58.20 $94.25 $92.80
$10,000 $231.50 $194.00 $239.80 $195.20 $900 $253.00 $173.80
$25,000 $434.00 $370.25 $509.80 $359.90 $195.16 $377.50 $323.20
$50,000 $771.50 $601.50 $959.80 $634.40 $325.65 $585.00 $572.20
$100,000 $1,396.50 $901.50 $1,834.80 $1,18180 $498.15 $1,560.00 $1,070.20
Plan Review Fees
Valuation Tigard Wash. Co. Beaverton Portland Tualatin Lake Oswego Gresham
$5,000 $35.38 $128.49 $35.58 $63.72 $37.83 $31.10 $60.32
$10,000 $57.88 $184.30 $59.95 $117.12 $60.26 $83.49 $112.97
$25,000 $108.50 $351.74 $127.45 $215.94 $126.85 $124.58 $210.08
$50,000 $192.88 $571.43 $239.95 $380.64 $211.67 $193.05 $371.93
$100,000 $349.13 $856.43 $458.70 $710.28 $323.80 $514.80 $695.63
Total Fees
Valuation Tigard Wash. Co. Beaverton Portland Tualatin Lake Oswego Gresham
$5,000 $176.88 $263.74 $177.88 $169.92 $96.03 $125.35 $153.12
$10,000 $289.38 $378.30 $299.75 $312.32 $152.96 $336.49 $286.77
$25,000 $542.50 $721.99 $637.25 $575.84 $322.01 $502.08 $533.28
$50,000 $964.38 $1,172.93 $1,199.75 $1,015.04 $537.32 $778.05 $944.13
$100,000 $1,745.63 $1,757.93 $2,293.50 $1,894.08 $821.95 $2,074.80 $1,765.83
6
Although the City's permit fees are in the upper end of the scale, the plan review fees are in the
lower end. The total fees, permit plus plan review, are the key fees that contractors and developers
will be looking at. As shown, the total fees for Tigard are lower than most with the exception of the
City of Tualatin. Staff believes these fees are comparable to other jurisdictions that provide the
same level of service.
Public Outreach
Staff notified the Building Codes Division of the City's proposed fee increase. They will mail this
notification to all persons on their Interested Party list. Staff is in the process of providing further
notification to mechanical contractors and firms that perform work in the City of Tigard. An open
house has been scheduled to answer questions and address any concerns prior to the City
Council Meeting on June 24th. The scheduled date for the open house is 6:30 PM in Town Hall on
Wednesday, June 18, 2003.
C. Jim Hendryx
L
7
u
1
a
7
fur
CIT'( of ~IGARD
FEES ANp CHARGEsSCHE~uLE
JUNE 2003
ResolN'o° No. o~~
r. aararfor r T S I KIP
DRAFT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITYWIDE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................1
Audiotapes ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................1
Computer disk or Compact disk ..................................................................................................................................................................................1
Faxes ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................1
Photocopies ................................................................................................................................................................................................................1
Research Fee .............................................................................................................................................................................................................1
CITY ADMINISTRATION ...............................................................................................................................................................................................2
Amplified Sound Event Permit ....................................................................................................................................................................................2
Claims Application Fee ...............................................................................................................................................................................................2
Complete Code (Titles 1-18) .......................................................................................................................................................................................2
Public Assembly .........................................................................................................................................................................................................2
Tigard Municipal Code (Titles 1-17) ...........................................................................................................................................................................2
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .....................................................................................................................................................................................3
Building - Tigard & Urban Services
Building Permit Fees ...............................................................................................................................................................................................3
Building Plan Review Fee .......................................................................................................................................................................................3
Deferred Submittals ................................................................................................................................................................................................4
Electrical Fees .........................................................................................................................................................................................................4
Erosion Control Permit Fee .....................................................................................................................................................................................5
Erosion Control Plan Check Fee .............................................................................................................................................................................5
Fee in Lieu of Sewer 5
Fire Life Safety Plan Review .....5
Manufactured Dwellings ..........................................................................................................................................................................................5
Mechanical Fees .....................................................................................................................................................................................................6
Mechanical Permit Fees ..........................................................................................................................................................................................7
Phase Permitting .....................................................................................................................................................................................................8
Plumbing Fees ........................................................................................................................................................................................................8
Residential Fire Suppression ................................................................................................................................................................................10
Restricted Energy ..................................................................................................................................................................................................10
Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee ...........................................................................................................................................................................11
Sanitary Sewer Inspection Fee .............................................................................................................................................................................11
i
man_
Tree Replacement Fee
Water Quality Fact Ity Fee
Water
Quantity F aclli DRAFT
Mis ty Fee..
Tigard . cellaneous Fees
PIA ces la eO . " ' •
al Units 1
rY Residential
An
.....1
11
Appeal q
Blasting nexation Permit .
APProval Extension
11
•
Condit!
tonal Use (CUP
srgn Evaluation
13
endation .13
Development Code Team (pEt) Recomm
(deposit)
Expedite
Hearin Review Provision Reve
W
„ . •
g Post on
P ement „ 3
Historic 3
1
Home ~verlay/Review District (hD) . . . .
occupation
13
Interpretation Permit (HOP)
Of the Co .13
Y
Develo...
' „
Joint mmunit
Application
n Plannin F de.,
Land Partition (MLP .
.
Lot Li
' : •.............14
M Horne Adjustment (MIS) 13
Modifcati . 14
Non-Confor m►ng on to Use Confirmation
' " •
Pre ed D (PD) m...........
me
-Application C nt
nfe
Sensitive Lan rence • •
Review (SL
R
Sign Permit......
Site Development 14
Review
Subdivision (SUB} (SDR)..........
Tree Re o a! e (TUP)
14
•
Vacation
Variance/
Adiustme , .......15
Zoning Map/Text qme
Zoning Analysrs (Detailed)ment (CPA/ZOA/ZON)
Zoning Inquiry Letter l (m
Miscellaneous Fees Ie.. p)
. 15
15
16
.............17
ii
NNW
BMW
ENGINEERING
Engineering Fees -Tigard
DRAFT
Addressing Assignment Fee..
compliance
Engineering Public Imnt Permit (Cqp) Fee.a
ee in Lieu of Under ovemenf De 9
sign St
ndar
Local l grounding ds
Improvement Of Assessments •
ment District
Reimbursement District . 19
9 Application Fee...
Reimbursement
ent District F
Street Opening Permit...
Streetlight Ener ' ....19
gY
&M " •
aint
Traffic/Pedestrian
edestrian Signs enance Fee
19
Traffic Control D
evic
Engineering Fee ....19
Addressing Assi`Urban Services 20
Co gnment Fe •
mpliance Agreement e
Street Opening Permit Perm ..it..... (CAP) Fee............. . 20
FINANCE........... ; 20
Budget Docugssumption 21
Business Tax ment .
.21 22
COMP eh nsive q '
Franchise Fee.. nnual Financial Report " 23
•
,
Lien S earch Fee •
23
Meeting Roo . " '
ese n Fees & p 23
Municipal Co
urtFees... eAosit.•, " ' • .
Waste ecords Fees .
Returned Check F 23
24
Solid ee ..24
CompactorPermit
...............24
LIBRARY .2G
Overdue Items (Non-video) • ..................27
Public Copier (ar eo) „ 28
harges... "
28
28
iii
DRAFT
POLICE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................29
Alarm Permits 29
Bicycle License .........................................................................................................................................................................................................29
Liquor License ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................29
Police Services Fees 29
Property Forfeiture for Criminal Activity ....................................................................................................................................................................29
Second Hand Dealers and Transient Merchant License ..........................................................................................................................................29
Vehicle Release Fee .................................................................................................................................................................................................29
PUBLIC WORKS .........................................................................................................................................................................................................30
City of Durham Contracting ......................................................................................................................................................................................30
Encroachment Permit 30
Park Reservation Fee ...............................................................................................................................................................................................30
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER 31
Booster Pump Charge 31
Customer Charge 31
Fire Hydrant and Meter Usage - Illegal Usage 31
Fire Hydrant Usage - Temporary .............................................................................................................................................................................31
Fire Rates (Sprinklers) ..............................................................................................................................................................................................31
Fire Service Connection ...........................................................................................................................................................................................31
Meter Disconnection .................................................................................................................................................................................................31
Meter Installation Fees .............................................................................................................................................................................................31
Meter Out-of-Order Test 32
Sanitary Sewer Service ............................................................................................................................................................................................32
Storm and Surface Water .........................................................................................................................................................................................32
Water Disconnection Charge for Non-payment ........................................................................................................................................................32
Water Line Construction - New Development ..........................................................................................................................................................32
Water Usage Charges ..............................................................................................................................................................................................32
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE .........................................................................................................................................................................34
Park SDC ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................34
Traffic Impact Fee .....................................................................................................................................................................................................37
Water SDC ................................................................................................................................................................................................................38
APPENDIX 39
Methodology to Calculate Park SDC ........................................................................................................................................................................40
Methodology to Calculate Traffic Impact Fee ...........................................................................................................................................................42
Methodology to Calculate Water SDC ......................................................................................................................................................................44
iv
DR►'`r `
I.EGIB►il't`f SCRIP
City of Ttiga schedgle E{►ective Date
fees and Charges
Fee or CharOe 0?003
0210712002
Revenue Source
Qepaoment ~5 00 299-1~
►pE AudiotapeS
or Compact disk 5710112Q03
Computer disk distance charges When app►'cab►e 0210712002
►,on9 Faxes $p,2511pa9e 0210712002
toll y 17 Staff cost plus materials
photocopies up
Research Fee
1
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
CITY ADMINISTRATION
$8 99 811M984
Claims Application Fee $1,000.00/deposit* 11/28/2000
'Application fee shall be actual cost incurred by the City to process application. Any funds
remaining from the deposit after the application has been processed will be refunded
to the applicant, and applicant shall be responsible for any additional costs incurred.
Complete Code (Titles 1 -18) $75.00 02/07/2002
Public Assembly 08/25/1970
Application Fee
Persons Reasonably Anticipated
1,000 to 2,499 $100.00
2,500 to 4,999 $150.00
5,000 to 9,999 $500.00
10,000 to 49,999 $1,000.00
50,000 and over $1,500.00
Tigard Municipal Code (Titles 1 - 17) $50.00 02107/2002
2
LE01151LItY 5TKIP
DRAFT
City of Tigard
Fees and Charges Schedule
Effective Date
f=ee or Charge
Department Revenue Source 09I26I2000
0511311997
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING -Tigard & Urban Services Area
Building Perm►t Fe
(Commercial, Multi-family an
LY"AiLm d Single-family) Minimum $62.50
Iota
$1-$2,000 $62.50 for the first $2,000 and $9.60
$2,001 - $25,000 for each additional $1,000 or fraction
thereof, to and including $25,000.
$283.30 for the first $25,000 and $7.50
$25,001 - $50,000 for each additional $1,000 or fraction
thereof, to and including $50,000.
$470.80 for the first $50,000 and $5.47
$50,001 - $100,000 for each additional $1,000 or fraction
thereof, to and including $
000 and $3.90
$744.30 for the first $100,
$100,001 - $250,000 for each additional $1,000 or fraction
thereof, to and including $250,000.
$1,329.30 for the first $250,000 and $3.85
n
$250,001 - $600,000 for each additional $1,000 or fr000.
thereof, to and including $
$2,676.80 for the first $600,000 and $3.51
$600,001 - $1,200,000 for each additional $1,000 or fraction
thereof, to and including $1,200,000.
d $2.73
$4,782.80 for the first $1,200,000 an
$1,200,001 - $2,00Q,000 for each additional $1,000 or fraction
thereof, to and including $2,000,000.
$2,000,001 and up $6,966.80 for the
for thereof
each additional` $1,000 or fraction ond
0912612000
65°10 of base building permit fee 0511311997`
Building Plan Review Fee *Urban Services Area to have
same fees as Tigard
3
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
Deferred Submittals Minimum Fee $200.00 09/24/2002
Plan Review 65% of building permit fee based
on valuation of the particular portion
or portions of the project.
Electrical Fees 06/27/2000
New residential, single or multi-family per dwelling unit; service included:
1000 square feet or less $145.15
Each additional 500 square
feet or portion thereof $33.40
Limited energy $75.00
Each manufactured home or
modular dwelling service or
feeder $90.90
Services or feeders; installation, alterations or relocation:
200 amps or less $80.30
201 amps to 400 amps $106.85
401 amps to 600 amps $160.60
601 amps to 1000 amps $240.60
Over 1000 amps or volts $454.65
Reconnect only $66.85
Temporary services or feeders; installation, alteration or relocation:
200 amps or less $66.85
201 amps to 400 amps $100.30
401 amps to 600 amps $133.75
Over 600 amps to 100 volts (see 2 above)
Branch circuits; new, alteration or extension per panel:
With purchase of service or
feeder - each branch circuit $6.65
Without purchase of service
orfeeder
First Branch Circuit $46.85
Each addit. Branch circuit $6.65
4
yip
►.GV{►~►► 4 ► Nr Effective Date
city of T►ga schedule
Fees and charges pee or charge
53.40
r not included) 53,40
ice or leede i anon circuit
Revenue Source M iscellaneous Ea h Pump or ur 9 light~n9
outline lim►ted $75 00
Department Each sign or
Signal circuik alteratwn or
eer9y P
an
extensi°n i inspection over
Each additions in any of the $62.50
the allowable 62 50
above (rain 1 hr) 1 hour)
er 1nsP ection $7375ihc lmin ermitfee 06j0612000
p 5 !o electrical P
Per Hour t lnspecton o of the
Indus{rial Pelan milt Plan review fee 2
Pe
E1edtrical
$26.04
each add•+t►0nal 10 ,
$40.00 0 000.00 rnit Pee + $24.00 for
Erosion COntves no e of this han $50,000.00 $40.00 p6j061240
city rece' Less t 00 to $1Q0,000.00 or fraction thereof
50 e~han $100,000.00 of inspection fee 1998
650to
t of sewer connedtion,
l cos 612 00
actua 0912 4
Fee Eased on as
heck 05j1311g97
Control Plan if sewer w ava1labte
Erosion 50/0 of tee) Prmit fee
icily receives building P ' *Drban Services Area to have
40°l0 °f base
of Sewer Sigard
tCoFee inrnLieumerOnly) same fees as 412002
cial 0912
Review
Fire Life Safety Plan $3p5 50
kcomrnereial Only)
nufactured dwelling installation
Ma 5
NOW-
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
Manufactured dwelling and mobile home parks, Per OAR 09/24/2002
recreation camps, and organizational camps
Mechanical Fees 06/27/2000
(1 and 2 Family Dwellings)
Description:
Furnace to 100,000 BTU including
ducts & vents $14.00
Furnace to 100,000 BTU+ including
ducts & vents $17.90
Floor Furnace including vent $14.00
Suspended heater, wall heater or
floor mounted heater $14.00
Vent not included in appliance permit $6.80
<3HP; absorb unit to 100K BTU $14.00
3-15HP; absorb unit to 100K to 500K BTU $25.60
15-30HP; absorb unit .5 -1 mil BTU $35.00
30-50HP; absorb unit 1 - 1.75 mil BTU $52.20
>50HP; absorb unit >1.75 mil BTU $87.20
Air handling unit to 10,000 CFM* $10.00
*Note: This fee does not apply to an airhandling unit which is a portion of a factory-assembled appliance, cooling unit,
evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere in the Mechanical Code.
Air handling unit to 10,000 CFM+ $17.20
Non-portable evaporate cooler $10.00
Vent fan connected to a single duct $6.80
Ventilation system not included in
appliance permit $10.00
Hood served by mechanical exhaust $10.00
Domestic incinerators $17.40
Commercial or industrial type incinerator $69.95
Repair units $12.15
Wood stove $10.00
Clothes dryer, etc. $10.00
Other units $10.00
6
~.a.aalo~L1 T 01 Ktr
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
Gas piping one to four outlets $5.40
More than 4 - per outlet (each) $1.00
For each appliance or piece of
equipment regulated by the Mechanical
Code, but not classed in other
appliance categories or for which no
other fee is listed in the table $10.00
Minimum Permit Fee $72.50 09/2412002
Plan Review 25% of Permit Fee
Other Inspections and Fees:
Inspections outside of normal business
hours (minimum charge - 2 hours) $62.50/hour 09/24/2002
Inspections for which no fee is specifically
indicated (minimum charge - one-half hour) $62.501each 09/24/2002
Additional plan review required by changes,
additions or revisions to plans (minimum
charge - one-half hour) $62.50/hour 09/24/2002
Mechanical Permit Fees 09/2612000
(Commercial and Multi-family) 05/13/1997*
*Urban Services Area to have
Total Valuation: same fees as Tigard
$1-$5,000 Minimum $72.50
$5,001 - $10,000 $72.50 for the first $5,000 and $1.52
for each additional $100 or fraction thereof,
to and including $10,000.
$10,001 - $25,000 $148.50 for the first $10,000 and $1.54
for each additional $100 or fraction thereof,
to and including $25,000.
$25,001 - $50,000 $379.50 for the first $25,000 and $1.45
for each additional $100 or fraction thereof,
to and including $50,000.
$50,001 and up $742.00 for the first $50,000 and $1.20
for each additional $100 or fraction thereof.
7
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
$1-$2,000 Minimum $72.50 08101/2003
$2,000 - $5,000 $72.50 for the first $2,000 and $2.30 for
each additional $100 or fraction thereof,
to and including $5,000.
$5,001 - $10,000 $141.50 for the first $5,000 and $1.80 for
each additional $100 or fraction thereof,
to and including $10,000.
$10,001 - $50,000 $231.50 for the first $10,000 and $1.35 for
each additional $100 or fraction thereof,
to and including $50,000.
$50,001 - $100,000 $771.50 for the first $50,000 and $1.25 for
each additional $100 or fraction thereof,
to and including $100,000.
$100,001 and up $1,396.50 for the first $25,000 and $1.10 for
each additional $100 or fraction thereof.
Plan Review 25% of permit fee 09/24/2002
Phase Permitting $200.00 09124/2002
Plan Review 10% of total project building permit fee
not to exceed $1,500 for each phase
Plumbing Fees 06/2712000
Description:
New Single-Family
1 Bath $249.20
2 Bath $350.00
3 Bath $399.00
Fixtures (Individual)
Sink $16.60
Lavatory $16.60
Tub or Tub/Shower Comb. $16.60
Shower Only $16.60
Water Closet $16.60
8
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
Dishwasher . $16.60
Garbage Disposal $16.60
Washing Machine $16.60
Floor Drain/Floor Sink 2" $16.60
Floor Drain/Floor Sink 3" $16.60
Floor Drain/Floor Sink 4" $16.60
Water Heater $16.60
Laundry Room Tray $16.60
Urinal $16.60
Other Fixtures $16.60
Sewer - 1 st 100' $55.00
Sewer - each additional 100' $46.40
Water Service - 1 st 100' $55.00
Water Service - each additional 100' $46.40
Storm & Rain Drain -1 st 100' $55.00
Storm & Rain Drain - ea. additnl 100' $46.40
Commercial Backflow Prevention
Device or Anti-Pollution Device $46.40
Residential Backflow Prevention Device $27.55
Any Trap or Waste Not Connected
to a Fixture $16.60
Catch Basin $16.60
Inspection of Existing Plumbing $72.50/hr
Specially Requested Inspections $72.50/hr
Rain Drain, single family dwelling $65.25
Grease Traps $16.60
Hose Bibs $16.60
Drinking Fountain $16.60
Roof Drains $16.60
Minimum Permit Fee $72.50
Minimum Permit Fee Residential
Backflow $36.25
Plan Review 25% of Permit Fee
9
DRp'~
LEGIBILITY STRIP
Effective D4j042
CttY of ~tgard educe 0912
fees and Charges Sch
fee of Charge
um $72.54 04 and $1.5 thereof,
1 gysteMS t~Ain►m the first $5,0
100 or fraction
Sour Me di cs Gas + 50 for
e artment Revenue $1 Y $5,000 $72
each additional ~ 000-
DP 0p1 _ $10,000 for and including $10, 400 and $1.54
thereof,
$5, t ofna4 $ p0 or fraction
$A49 •50 for th
each add l. $25 000•
$10,001 - $25,000 ftor and including , 004 and $1.45
JOT the first $.20 or fraction
for thereof
$379.50
each additional 000.
5 401 ' $50,000 and including $50' 50,000 and $120
$2 , to an the first $ coon thereof.
$742. 00 for or fra 091241~002
for each additional $100
$50,001 and up
stems perms loop System $115•00
S
SuPPression ose or Continuous $160.00
Residential Fire NtultP P $220 00
0 to 2,000 $30000
2,001 to 3,600
3,501 to 7,200
7,20A and greater $187.50
System $232.50
Stand Atone $292.50
0 to 2,000 $381.50 0612712000
2,001 to 3,600
3,601 to 7,200
7201 an 9 $75.00
$75.00
Use
Restricted Ener9Y Residential Anne 9v Use
Commercial E
10 00090
DRAFT
IDIOM,
NOOLOOO City of Tigard Effective Date
Fees and charges Schedule
Fee or Charge 0710112003
~ unit
$2,404.OOIdwelliN 0610612000
Revenue Source
pepartrnent Sewer Connection Fee $35.00
Sanitary $45.00
sanitarY Sewer Inspection Fee $75'00 0910112001
Residential
Corn"' C'al $125.001caliber inch 0610612(300
industrial
Tree Replacement lee $225 001 unit ervious surface
Water ,640 sq. it of additional imp 0610612000
5 4012
Quay FacI fly Fee collected) $22
% of fees le Family
(City receives 1 00 Residential Single
Commercial & surface
$275.001 unit impervious
~ Facility Fee 0012,640 sg' ft additional 0612712000
Water Quantity O/ of fees collected) $275.
100 o le Family
(0111 receives Residential Sing
Commercial & Wfl-family $65.00
$100.00
Miscellaneous Fees Address Change ections for residential structure ss of 3
Fee paid ►nsp Chapter 16 Dwellings ellin9 unit in exce
t to -Title 14e & TWo FamAy each dw ss of 5
pursuan Sing W social 00, Plus $7 for eadwelling unit in ex~
Apartment HOuses $160 1us $5 for each 0912412002
$160.00, p
Care Facilities
Hotels $62.54
$62.50
Re-inspection $62.50 0612712000
Building $62.50
Mechanical $2Qp 00
Plumbing
Electrical
phased Occupancy
11
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
Permit or Plan Review Extension $72.50
Research on non-current permits $45.00lhr (min 1 hour, charged in 1 hour increments)
Temporary Occupancy $90.00
12
soon= STRIP DRAFT
L.EGIBII.ITY
City of Tigard
Fees and Charges Schedule Effective Date
Fee or Charge 0710112002
- $100.00
D epartment & Urban sereices 0710112402
Source Tigard
Revenue WG 'N aEVEI.OPMENT - p~ANN $1,78().00
COIJiM Accessory Residential Units
UNI
07101 12002
Annexation $25().00 (71()112002
to Hearings officer $30().00 0710112042
Appeal Decision ITYPe tt) $500.00
Director's eview (Deposit) 0710112402
Expedited R $1,790.00 p710112402
Hearings Referee earing's officer to
Planning CommissionlH
council $200.00
City 0710112002
$145.00
Approval Extension 0710112002
I Blasting Permit $3,540.00
$3,540.00
Conditional Use $435.04
Initial 0714112442
Major Modification $1,000.00
Minor Modification
0710112002
ation Team (pE~ Recommendation (deposit)
Design Bvalu $40.00
Provision Review $250.00
rpen StingCede►e-PamilY gwilding plan 0710112002
Develop
s trialllnstitution
CommerciallIndu$29-35.00
+ $8o.ooll-ot
eview $3A . 4 Expedited R Land Pastitlon Add $4,720-00
ment 0710112002
Subdivision planned Develop $225.00
Subdivision with Hearing postponement
13
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
Historic Overlay/Review District 07/01/2002
Historic Overlay Designation $3,045.00
Removal Historic Overlay Designation $3,045.00
Exterior Alteration in Historic Overlay District $465.00
New Construction in Historic Overlay District $465.00
Demolition in Historic Overlay District $465.00
Home Occupation Permit (Original Permit) 07/01/2002
Type 1 $30.00
Type II $215.00
Interpretation of the Community Development Code $460.00 07/01/2002
Joint Application Planning Fee 100% of Highest Planning 07/0112002
Fee + 50% of all Additional
Fees Related to the Proposal.
Land Partition 07/01/2002
Residential and Non-Residential (3 Lots) $2,435.00
Residential and Non-Residential (2 Lots) $1,935.00
Expedited $2,935.00
Lot Line Adjustment $310.00 07/01/2002
Minor Modification to an Approved Plan $435.00 07/01/2002
Non-Conforming Use Confirmation $205.00 07/01/2002
Planned Development 07/01/2002
Conceptual Plan Review $4,715.00
Detailed Plan Review Applicable SDR Fee
Pre-Application Conference $200.00 07/01/2002
14
UN..
MGV,p4~~ ` ~ ~ y ~►r
CItY of {rga Schedule E{tective Dam
d Charles p710112002
Fees an Fee or Charge
a sl $1.720.00
Source thin Drainage W y $
venue p p0
ment $ensit ive Lands Review sive SioPeslw► sl 1
Depart ,86
With Exce ds lType ll) mage Way
Wetlan thin Dra $1,86p 00
Within SlopesW 0710112002
111) type I1Q
With Excessive Type l
ds l la"ng
Within Wetlan Floodp
100 Year $3p 00
Within the
$15.00
02
to an Existing 5190 p7l01120
Sign permit p tAodificalion
Existing an it{erential)
Size Sign) 00 1 Million
lNo oraN Sign leer $g,0o0.OO over
0p0•
01S10.
Temp $5.
Modification cation $4,045.00 +
view & Major $435.00
p00.00 0710112002
Development Re
Site k3nder 100,
1 tJlillionlpVer p•p011ot
odificat'on
Minor M $3,190.00 + $8
Devetopment Add $472 p0
planned $50 o p710112002
plla wianned Development
Subdivision preliminary
prelim►nery p $2p5.00
Final plat $p.00
0710112002
Temporary Use ctor sDecision profit $112.00 p710112002
Dire tionltAon'
Special Exemp
500 Deposit +
$1,30 •
Tree Removal Actual 0710112002
Streets and Public Access) Costs
Vacation ( $4650J
$205.00
Variance/AdJu,dMinti lratkve~ariar►ce
Development Adfustment
15 goo
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
Special Adjustments
Adjustment to a Subdivision $205.00
Reduction of Minimum
Residential Density $205.00
Access/Egress Standards
Adjustment $465.00
Landscaping Adjustments
Existing/New Street Trees $205.00
Parking Adjustments
Reduction in Minimum or Increase
In Maximum Parking Ratio $465.00
Reduction in New or Existing
Development/Transit Imprvmnt $465.00
Reduction in Bicycle Parking $465.00
Alternative Parking Garage
Layout $205.00
Reduction in Stacking Lane
Length $465.00
Sign Code Adjustment $465.00
Street Improvement Adjustment $465.00
Tree Removal Adjustment $205.00
Wireless Comi-nwnication Facility Adjustments
Setback from Nearby Residence $465.00
Distance from Another Tower $205.00
Zoning Map/Text Amendment 07101/2002
Legislative - Comprehensive Plan $6,600.00
Legislative - Community Development Code $2,510.00
Quasi-Judicial $2,290.00
Zoning Analysis (Detailed) $435.00 07/01/2002
Zoning Inquiry Letter (Simple) $50.00 07/01/2002
16
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - Miscellaneous Fees & Charges
Community Development Code 02/07/2002
Complete (Title 18) $50.00
CD Rom $10.00
Comprehensive Plan - Volumes 9 & 2 $77.00 1997
GIS Maps 02/07/2002
8.5" x 11
Black and White $0.00
Color $1.50
11" x 17"
Black and White $1.50
Color $2.50
17" x 22"
Black and White $2.50
Color $5.00
22" x 32"
Black and White $5.00
Color $7.50
34" x 44"
Black and White $7.50
Color $10.00
17
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
Maps 02/07/2002
Address Maps by Section $2.50/plot
Annexation & Road Jurisdiction $10.00/plot
As-Built Drawings $2.50/copy or plot
Assessor's Tax Map $2.50/copy or plot
Bike Path Plan $6.00/plot
Buildable Lands Inventory $10.00/plot
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map $10.00/plot
Orthophotographs $5.00/copy
Stream Corridor & Wetlands Map $10.00/plot
Street Index Map $10.00/plot
Subdivision Map $10.00/plot
Subdivision Plat Map $2.50/copy
Topographic Maps $5.00/copy
Transportation Plan Map $10.00/plot
Vertical Bench Mark Control Map $6.00/copy
Zoning Map $10.00/plot
Neighborhood Meeting Signs (Landuse) $2.00 1997
Oversize Load Permit $10.00 05/21/1990
Planimetric Maps 03/10/1986
Blueline print - quarter section $5.00
Mylar - quarter section $150.00 + reproduction cost
Tigard Transportation System Plan $15.00 2000
Washington Square Regional Center 1999
Task Force Recommendations $10.00
Master Plan Map (Zoning/Plan) $2.50
18
t
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
ENGINEERING - Tigard
Addressing Assignment Fee $30.00 02/09/1999
02/09/4999
so 10;999 1,280.00
48,081-- 20,888 1,209.00 4. ° 19,090
8VeF 29,004 59,090 2,200.00 8.9% eV8F 29,099
59,904 89,088 4,609.90 6.90% 9VeF ,
8(),001 400,00() 6,4 00.00 4.00% eYeF 80,090
400,094 300,090 7,209.00 2.0% eveF 490-,M
309,004 500,09-9 4 4,209.09 1.0% eveF 300,099
590,004 --aad-Up 43,209.99 ° 590,000
Engineering Public Improvement Design Standards $5.00 07/15/1998
Fee in lieu of Undergrounding 27.50/lineal feet of frontage Prior to 1996
Public Facility Improvement Permit 04/1512002
Estimated Cost of Public Improvement Deposit`
$0 to $4,000 Minimum non-refundable fee of $150.00
$4,001 to $10,000 $1,200.00
$10,001 to $20,000 $1,200.00 + 10% over $10,000
$20,001 to $50,000 $2,200.00 + 8.0% over $20,000
$50,001 to $80,000 $4,600.00 + 6.0% over $50,000
$80,001 to $100,000 $6,400.00 + 4.0% over $80,000
$100,001 to $300,000 $7,200.00 + 2.0% over $100,000
$300,001 to $500,000 $11,200.00 + 1.0% over $300,000
$500,001 and Up $13,200.00 +.5% over $500,000
19
0 mmi
VL.VfYfVf f f V f f~ff
DRAFT
City of Tigard
Fees and Charges Schedule
Effective Date
Fee or charge
Department Revenue Source
*Deposit to be paid as follows: fans $150.00 non-refundable intake fee.
Upon submittal of p Balance of calculated deposit is due.
Prior to formal plan review
0712411996
Actual Cost
Local improvement District Assessments 300.00 01/27i1998
Reimbursement District Application Fee
07I10I2001
Not to Exceed 6,000.00 unless
Reimbursement District Fee reimbursement fee exceeds 15,000.00
Any amount over 15,000.00 shall be
reimbursed by the owner. 6,000.00 limit
valid for only 3 years from Council approval
of district cost. Igga
She~~
i lee
Bend
~eled-way
Maintenance Fee Based upon PGE Sch #91 Opt, "B" 2000
Streetlight Energy & for the first two years costs
0210712002
Cost of materials and labor
Traffic/Pedestrian Signs
0510111996
Traffic Control Devices 50% of cost
Speed Hump Program
20
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
ENGINEERING - Urban Services
Address Assignment Fee 30.00 10113/1998
19M 3A 998
$8-18;998 1,299.90
~9,00i 29,989 1,200.00 40,0; eveF ,
29,091 59,000 2,200.0 8.00% GVeF 20,009
5(),004 -89;999 4,609.99 6.0% GVeF ,
8(),()04 400,000 6,400.00 4.0% 9V8F ,
499;994-399;999 7,200.00 ° , eYeF 0 eveF 300,000
599,991 aRd Up 43,209.90 ° GVeF 590,999
*Deposit to be paid ar, fellews-i
- plaR6
Public Facility Improvement Permit 0411512002
Estimated Cost of Public Improvement Deposit*
$0 to $4,000 Minimum non-refundable fee of $150.00
$4,001 to $10,000 $1,200.00
$10,001 to $20,000 $1,200.00 + 10% over $10,000
$20,001 to $50,000 $2,200.00 + 8.0% over $20,000
$50,001 to $80,000 $4,600.00 + 6.0% over $50,000
$80,001 to $100,000 $6,400.00 + 4.0% over $80,000
$100,001 to $300,000 $7,200.00 + 2.0% over $100,000
$300,001 to $500,000 $11,200.00 + 1.0% over $300,000
$500,001 and Up $13,200.00 +.5% over $500,000
*Deposit to be paid as follows:
Upon submittal of plans $150.00 non-refundable intake fee.
Prior to formal plan review Balance of calculated deposit is due.
21
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
8th
Fee
8GRd
22
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
FINANCE
Assessment Assumption $50.00 04/2211985
Budget Document $0.00 02/0712002
Business Tax 05116/1988
Annual Fee
0 -10 employees $55.00
11 - 50 employees $110.00
51 or more employees $220.00
Prorated Fee
for the initial month when issued on or before the 15th of the month
0 -10 employees $4.58
11 - 50 employees $9.17
51 or more employees $18.33
for the initial month when issued after the 15th of the month
0 - 10 employees $2.29
11 - 50 employees $4.59
51 or more employees $9.17
for the each month after the initial month until the next annual biling
cycle begins (January 1)
0 - 10 employees $4.58
11 - 50 employees $9.17
51 or more employees $18.33
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report $0.00 02107/2002
23
WNW
`~GtB1L~.
~f STRIP
c1w °f Ties schedule Egective
Fees Date
and chacg charge 99
Feaor 0112 I'20p1
es revenue 0412
5111 of gro revenue 10126j1g93
3% 01 gross venue 1211912p00
gource of gross re
Revenue
Department Franchise Fee Op or 5°/0 Ol gross
realer
CableN $7 500
E1ectrtc►ty ue, wh►chever is 9 loot
Natural Gas tion utjytes revers or 2 g011inear
munlca munlcat~on $7, 500.00 right of way,
Telecom -Telecom of lnstallat►on ► seater
roviders and Whichever is g oss
~on9 ate n cmorks $7 500.00 or 50/0 of gr 01
ater
private ne Whichever is gre 01123120
and 10109j1g7S
ss providers reVe 8,2,000.00
'onmpetit►ve acce s revenue
all f,anchlsees licat►on fee of 9r0s 06j1~2001
unlcation Franchise App 25.00
Telecom Ste Disposal 07101120p3
solid Wa
Lien Search Fee & Deposits ~50'p0 serration Fees
enters t
Meeting Rp0 P►R fee tsenior time call out a °ne Year and suspension tnvee m°nth
First Gall-O $75.00 for
SeGOT% room use privileges
period t Within a one-year
Third call-OU 4169-0
period 2 90`
6teu°' - ire tlaa 5
Oeawljl
a
p7i0112003
$100.00
cleaning Deposit
24
r.rvaYaia a a v a nar
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
Red Rock Creek Conference Room 98f2f ANS
Slase-4 -aad-2
Glass -3 4().OGv ~
Glass 4 h
Group 1 $5.001hr 07101/2003
Group 2 $10.001hr
Group 3 $15.001hr
Richard M. Brown Auditorium 8S126ii 995
Gla° 4 a 2 040
Glass 3
Blass 4 hF
Group 1 $12.00/hr 07/01/2003
Group 2 $17.00/hr
Group 3 $22.001hr
095
Glass 1 and 2
Glass 3 9.00i
Glass -4
Glass -5 25.09ih
Senior Center Upstairs Activity Room 0710112003
Group 1 $15.001hr
Group 2 $20.001hr
Group 3 $25.001hr
Senior Center Downstairs Activity Room 07/0112003
Group 1 $10.001hr
Group 2 $15.00/hr
Group 3 $20.001hr
25
oil mill
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
Senior Center Classroom or Craft Room 994£49%
Glas&4-aPA4 9:89
8266 3 5.09il;F
Glass -4 :18.00ill
Glass 5 45.0wh
Group 1 $5.00/hr 07/01/2003
Group 2 $10.001hr
Group 3 $15.001hr
Town Hall BSi64M
Glass -l-and 2 9:88
Glass 3 29.gWhF
Glass -4 25:89~14F
Group 1 $10.001hr
Group 2 $15.00/hr
Group 3 $20.00/hr
Water Lobby Conference Room 98lNA 995
Glass 1 and 2 04)0
Glass 3 18:8911
Glass 4 af; 8811
Group 1 $5.00/hr 0710112003
Group 2 $10.00/hr
Group 3 $15.00/hr
Municipal Court Fees 9N6/2894
04110/2003
Civil Compromise $150.00
Copies (eyeF 10 pages) 0.25/page
Diversion
Criminal $150.00
Juvenile non-traffic $75.00
Traffic School $45.G9
$55.00
Seat Belt Safety Class $20.00
Traffic School Setover $20.00
26
LEGIBILITY STRIP
DRAFT
City of Tigard
Fees and Charges Schedule
Fee or Charge Effective Date
Department Revenue Source $15.00
License Reinstatement $15.00
Payment Agreement Administrative Fee $10.00
Overdue Payment Letter
Show Cause Hearings - Court Costs $25.00
Non-compliance
Non-payment - fees paid prior to No Fee
hearing $50.00
Warrant Fee
Records fees &.2Wpage 4-999
1999
Microfiche/film copies $0.25/page
8 1/2 x 11
11 x 14 $0.50/page
11 x 17 $1.001page 2000
Microprints $0.25/page 1999
Photographs Actual Cost " 2989
Audie. Be &.4&4 r4&"aa9e-aada-8g ~A84
~9e .age-tgeFea#teF
Actual Cost 1999
Recording of Documents a-s~ue 4-989
PwseaF6htLab to
Attorney billing rate 1999
Attorney time
$20.00 10/09/2001
Returned Check Fee
$100.00 12117/1991
Solid Waste Compactor Permit
27
V~
T
IIL0 g tIP
I.EG tlgaed e&ve Date
Olt City °t Schedule E
Pees and Cbarges
Fee or Charge 0210712002
$1.00
0710112443
Source RePtacement Cost +
Revenue
p fee
aliment t4r sing
ep
~Ig RY Disk {dank) $5.00 P
p710112043
Lost Items item 1987
~4,151item
$2,501item 1987
Non-video
overdue Ite paiiy Charge
Charge $1,p01video 2p01
MSAMI, $5 pp►item
Items (Video) $0.101Page
Overdue Dal l Char Charge
MaX►mum
r charges
public Copie
$ P
2
LEGIBILITY STRIP
DRAFT
City of Tigard
Fees and Charges Schedule
Fee or Charge Effective Date
Department Revenue Source
06/2811982
POLICE
Alarm Permits $15.00
Burglary or Robbery $25.00
Combination - Burglary and Robbery
9-W 424849P
g~rele-Nsease
$25.00 06/2811982
Failure to Obtain or Renew Alarm Permit Fee
"~'-moo;
False Alarm Charge 25404alse-,aki"
4--4-false-a4ar ~s 59494alse- WTR
&-&%6e. 4arMs 74.404at6e~
7--8-false-a4a s a 5G409a4se~
9e~ $50.00 0710112003
3rd false alarm $75.00
4th false alarm $100.00
5th false alarm $150.00
6 or more false alarms
$25.00 07110/2001
Liquor License
03/12/1984
Police Services Fees $5.00 for the first 10 pages
Police Report Copies and $0.25/page thereafter
. t g~S84
Police Photograph Copies 10.001roll 0710112003
Finger Prints $5.00/set (both hands)
varies 05/2511999
Property Forfeiture for Criminal Activity
$10.00 05/23/1983
Second Hand Dealers and Transient Merchant License
$15.00 Prior to 1995
Vehicle Release Fee
29
, v nor
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
PUBLIC WORKS
021070092
Mewing $55.00
iime+ mate0als
Encroachment Permit None has been set yet 12/07/1999
Park Reservation Fee* 12108/1992
Application Fee $10.00
Covered Picnic Area Rental
Tigard Based Rental Rate
Groups up to 50 $6.00/hour
51 to 100 $8.001hour
101 to 150 $15.00/hour
151 to 200 $20.00/hour
201 to 250 $25.00/hour
Non-Tigard Based Rental Rate
Groups up to 50 $12.00/hour
51 to 100 $16.00/hour
101 to 150 $30.00/hour
151 to 200 $40.00/hour
201 to 250 $50.00/hour
Soccer/Ballfields
Tigard Based Rental Rate $4.00/hour
Non-Tigard Based Rental Rate $B.001hour
* Park Reservation Fees have been proposed to be increased as shown in the memo from
Dan Plaza dated June 3, 2003. Council needs to determine which of the three proposed
options should be adopted. These new fees will be added to this Fees and Charges
Schedule once a decision is made. The new fees will become effective on January 1, 2004.
30
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER
Booster Pump Charge $3.89/bimonthly 10/01/2002 - 09/30/2003
$4.12/bimonthly 10/0112003 - 09130/2004
$4.37/bimonthly 10/01/2004
Customer Charge $4.40/bimonthly 10/01/2002 - 09/30/2003
(Basic fee charged to customers to have the City deliver water.) $4.66/bimonthly 10101/2003 - 09/30/2004
$4.94/bimonthly 1010112004
Fire Hydrant Usage - Temporary
5/8 x 3/4" hydrant meter deposit* $60.00 09/01/2002
3" hydrant meter deposit* $650.00 09/01/2002
3/4" double check valve deposit* $75.00 09/01/2002
2" double check valve deposit* $100.00 09/01/2002
*Deposit is refundable if returned in good condition
Hook-up service $50.00 0212712001
Continued use $50.00/month 02/2712001
Consumption Current irrigation water usage 0910112002
rate per 100 cubic feet of water used
Fire Rates (Sprinklers) 02/27/2001
6" or smaller $17.00/month
8" or larger $22.50/month
Fire Service Connection $1,400.00 + 12% fee based 02/27/2001
on construction costs.
Meter Disconnection Actual labor and material 09/01/2002
costs + 10%
Meter Installation Fees
5/8" x 3/4" Meter $325.00 02/27/2001
1" Meter $500.00
1 1/2" Meter $850.00
2" Meter $1,000.00
3" or more Meter Actual Cost 05/23/2000
31
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
Meter Out-of-Order Test Meter calibration cost + actual 09/01/2002
labor and material costs + 10%
Sanitary Sewer Service 06196~2999
21.4,0; Of fees 69119GWEI) 07/01/2003
(City receives 19.6% of fees collected)
Base Charge at#
16.63/dwelling unit/month
Use Charge
1.151100 cubic feet/month for individual
customer winter average
Storm and Surface Water 06/06/2000
(City receives 75% of fees collected)
Service Charge $4.00/ESU/month
Water Disconnection Charge for Non-payment 02/27/2001
During business hours $50.00
Water Line Construction - New Development 12% of Actual Cost 02/27/2001
Water Main Extension
Designed and installed by others 12% of Actual Cost 09/0112002
Water Usage Charges
Residential $1.71/100 cubic feet of water 10/01/2002 - 09/30/2003
$1.811100 cubic feet of water 10/01/2003 - 0913012004
$1.92/100 cubic feet of water 10101/2004
Multi-Family $1.69/100 cubic feet of water 10/01/2002 - 09130/2003
$1.791100 cubic feet of water 10/01/2003 - 09130/2004
$1.90/100 cubic feet of water 10101/2004
Commercial $1.99/100 cubic feet of water 10/01/2002 - 09130/2003
$2.11/100 cubic feet of water 10/01/2003 - 09/30/2004
$2024/100 cubic feet of water 10/01/2004
32
Elm
City of Tti9ard edule Ef{ecti~ve pate 012003
d Charges geh a 1010112002 ` 0913012004
Fees an Fee °r Charg feet of water 1010112003 -
1.651100 cubrc ater 14(01(200
cubic feet °f water 09130!2003
$17511C0 1pl0112402 '
8,1861104 cubic feet oE water 010112003 0913012p04
1 -
'au a $OUrce X2.121100 cubic fee of water 10101120p4
?,eve
Department Industrial cub►. , et ater
$2.251100 Cubic feet of w
$2.39(100
lrrigat~0n
33
DRAFT
City of Tigard
Fees and Charges Schedule
Effective Date
Fee or charge 8
0110112003
gepartment Revenue Source
DIEVELOPMENT . PLANNING a SDC)* $ -0
COMMUNITY park System Development Charge ( $1,747 00
Single Family Unit
Attached Single Family Unit $4,g
(Row house, Townhouse) $V4__W
condominiums $905.00
Apartment Unit, in I cludin9 $4•, -
Spaces in a manufactured home park $1,225.00
8
Commerciallindustrial (per employee) $124,00
used to calculate the charges. 0411012001
-See Appendix for methodology
parks annually on, lanuary 1st of each year
ustment usted
park SDC Annual Adj multiplying the
d by
SDC fees shall be adj c
beginning in 2002• The new fee will be determine hangeSin
fees by the average of two indices, one reflecting efi changes in land
and one
existing
developmendconstruction coste of these two indices
is 50 o betwe In land
The averag hl split
acquisition costs. S
approach because the parksrDnt components, roughly acquisition and land developcost for
uisition component will be the bas ton County
The index for the Land Ac ard, as determined by the Washing
residential tract land in T+9
he average cost for residential d of the buildablellands in T 9 sard.
Appraiser. T rice percentage
it is readily identified and is the lowest p
and projected
base cost c of be cal uto ►or g~na1 yms o a index Measure 5 the
Changesin this change ,
increase, to create the level raised values on
to the overall acquisition cost . In accordance with ,
Washington County Appraiser's office will determine app
July 1 of each year.
34
•.rw•r•r• • • v • r ~n ,
DRAFT
City of Tigard
Fees and Charges Schedule
Fee or Charge Effective Date
artment Revenue Source she be the
Dep the Land Development component ofublished in Declember
The index for th
Construction Cost Index for the City of Seattle as p
issue of the Engineering News Record (ENR). The Seattle cost index will
be used because the city is the geographically closest to Tigard of twenty
metropolitan areas for which the ENR maintains cost data. This index is
adjusted monthly, quarterly, and annually. The annual index for each year
will be selected beginning with the index for December 2002. The annual
index will be used because it is available in December and most closely
coincides with the January 1 st implementation of Park SDC fee adjustments.
Park SDC Annual Adjustment (cont.)
~ elation Definitionsi
SDC (2000) = Current SDC fee
L (2000) = Average cost of residential tract land 2000
L (2001) = Average cost of residential tract land 2001
L (2xxx) = Average cost of residential tract land 2xxx
C (2000) = Construction cost index of 2000
C (2001) = Construction cost index of 2001
C (2xxx) = Construction cost index of 2xxx
LCI = Land Cost Index: change from the current year from previous year
CCI = Construction Cost oindex st Index: change of change Clro CCIe current year from previous year
ACI = Average cos
E91MIMIX =LCI
L (2001) I L (2000)
and =CCI
C (2001) I C (2000)
therefore = AC1
LCI + CCI / 2
then =SDC (2002)
SDC (2001) X ACI
Each year subsequent to 2002, the costs shall be revised using the current
35
6„G~91D141 i i 7 ~ pRAFT
Wagon- City of Tigard
Fees and charges Schedule Effective Date
l=ee or Charge
the foregoing, all calculations
Not withstanding product ending in .4901
Revenue Source previous year, data. lace. A final p up to the next
Department year and thousandth p 50 or more
shall be carried out to wn to the nearest dolrPo~rn the adjustment calculation
less shall be round pevelopment staff will p
dollar. Community ear.
and prepare the resolution each y
36
LcV'ar~~ ~ j a ~ K~r
.Tigard City oSchedule Effect►Ve Du
ow~ and Charges
Fees F fe or Charge
0710112003
source eel trip
Revenue xa eekday
Department ~ $25erage w
GI ct Fee ate
EN ERIN Tragic Impa
l'lE G
y .
Trip Resident►al Use g91a eekda trip
rcial Use $6q,p01average W
s e ekday trip
gusineSs &
Comore SZ 401avera9e w
Ola~ eekday trip
OtfIce use V17-
eekday
Industrial Use 9`0 laverage w
$105 trip
wf4,
Inst►tutional Use trip
daily
$1g,001aver8ge
ransit Rate
the charges' All fees and
or ashin9t0n C°unlY
do •
endix flogY used to by W
metho
ro9ram is g°
*see App►c Impact Fee ne Counw-
line draft set by
procedures are
37
1 T 01 KIP
City of Tigard DRAFT
Fees and Charges Schedule
Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER
Water System Development Charge (SDQ 11/28/2000
518" x 314" Meter
410 Service Area $2,041.00
Bull Mountain System $2,763.00
1" Meter
410 Service Area $5,103.00
Bull Mountain System $6,908.00
1 1/2" Meter
410 Service Area $7,348.00
Bull Mountain System $9,947.00
2" Meter
410 Service Area $16,328.00
Bull Mountain System $22,104.00
3" Meter
410 Service Area $30,615.00
Bull Mountain System $41,445.00
4" Meter
410 Service Area $51,025.00
Bull Mountain System $69,075.00
6" Meter
410 Service Area $102,050.00
Bull Mountain System $138,150.00
8" Meter
410 Service Area $163,280.00
Bull Mountain System $221,040.00
10" Meter
410 Service Area $293,496.00
Bull Mountain System $397,319.00
12" Meter
410 Service Area $775,907.00
Bull Mountain System $1,050,382.00
'See Appendix for methodology used to calculate the charges.
38
DRAFT
APPENDIX
➢ Methodology to Calculate Park SDC
➢ Methodology to Calculate Traffic Impact Fee
➢ Methodology to Calculate Water SDC
s
rG ~CE PARK SDC+ eloprnent of Parks,
GI lO OA~CVIA r the acau'Isit'Io s for new ev res!'( a er ge
00~
O a1 ark with th
THO~oI. ments foaddition p C varies
ssed tO new dev o building -the S~
are asse the cost t 'Ices Area. sed in
to ment charg is a fee to recd ` y or Urban SeN are eXPres
the City Set Area s
deve P dards Urban the The park sYs aved tra'IIs• as cup ntly e cow a d velop►~nent' needs The Lork ng in
ways an P e level ected f ine fac,Vtj loyees w and Urban determine
ieev\ Yees at the emPlOYees eXP dards to determ and 1,000 emP ed on the City employment t
nts associated
number of peOPle o ~~ps} stan residents living ds are bas lation SOC and requireme are
0 roj funded ulvernents , o
level of SeNice OO late facility nee ected POP' and 0 1 0
residents
relies on acres per o calcu lied tO Area co►nb'Ined• c'Ial rA,000
total f'Inan
The City bet of park s use d then app e eac
ms of the nu `CS Standar standards are ►c to h Urban Sere facilit'Ies• Th'Ioned
combined- 'Ices
ter Area• 1"~ nd the City ar'd to the needed aPP°
SeN'Ices in The ventoN She lied s'Idents ices Area and p
arks the C►tY aPP ees andre SeN curren P invent fe or future park
eX►st%ng p , needs for aced un►t d to emP1oy Urban t ark
fac'I1'Ity o eds a e then ass►gn City and the C'ty of the city s t and emp1py
future based he SOCs for the analysis tesiden
calculated ark ne eXtensive capita by
with ,ogees to derive t ss comP1eted an ine cost per
ern tes, Inc' osts to determ
is Resource A of factors ant analysis: ~1 and
Emp1oYee
Ec n~ hGn used e be`tQw show their fina Vnitcosts city of g elf cost Per
e otal
T
costs• The tabl tEXisC~ng SeN ice Le capita Developed 1'an o $34166
$2 588
host per Total $13,578
standard hand $77,711
pcres11000) Developed $2g1,759 $477,605 $42 $77,669
Employee $3,016
Capita $195,846 $118,490 $0
p.305 $118?l26 $3,p16
parkTVe 4.101 $64 $4,599 8 $114,893
2.002 $0 $16.636 $9257
SotalParks 3,052 $1,104
1 $4,599 85 $600,694
0.02
0.032 $200, $400,1
509 $5,772 $116
Greenways
paved 3'ralls
Recreat►on $606
`total All Gity
Cost of Master Planning
cost Per cap►ta 40
The per capita amount for cost per capita is then multiplied by the average number of people who will live in the various
types of dwellings. This information was obtained from the 1990 U.S Census of Population and Housing. Those numbers
are as follows:
Persons per Residential Unit
City of Tigard, 1998
Residential Unit Household Size
Single Family 2.70
Multi-Family 1.70
Apartments 1.40
Manufactured Homes 1.90
For commercial development, per capita for cost per employee amount is multiplied by expected amount of employees
anticipated to work within the space.
For Example:
The calculation for the SDC for a single-family unit in Tigard is:
$606.00 (cost per capita) x 2.70 (household size) = $1,636.20 *
*This amount has been rounded up to $1,640.00 in the final resolution that set the SDC fees.
41
CuLA~~' TRp,FF►C ltalpxa EVE act on the
-TO CAI. ment,s protected impact to
they are tints, Which
a~o1-oGY the develop s
1~ ment for the number of trips
ed to new develop based on iVA imp such minor
ess to p and transit cap needs as
ass
►c Impact Fee (T) ►s ernes will be d qo {und off-sitT` gdoes not fund eX►st►ng ory
The count``N►de Traff Developing proP will be use stem. The Use Categ
tra -the
ropr. to hand Use puce the
tem. basis • TIF revenue ortatlon system.
n sPortat►on sYs } the major transP ost app
er tria achy the and lnstitut►oria rovided by reconstructi trip
to lee .p to le-'s. on a table P
genera ( project is to determinelndustrial Use average
provide additional calntenanGe P O{f►ce Use, looked upits), Weekday
ing calculation are ucn
inat►on
on or m TIF for a' develop ommere►al Use,
for the dete
T rm
in calculating use, Business ~ values need basis for trip
he first step esident►al fined, the category,
categories t has beet ble contains the land use
land use rate The rate
Washin9t°weekend averagatrip formula:
rate and the following
lculated using e This
The TIF is Trip Rate TIF each land use typ
a e Trips X Units X er unit for b W ash►ngton
day Aver 9 number of trips table provided y
Week e of the listed ►
tin an averag This value ►s table' the
Where resen ost land uses- use in the number 01
da Is
a value rep e for m each land ondos, etc),
County and is
Aver e Tris ►s TIF ordinanc its is set for apartmtints,
VNeek The type of uunits (for
value is Set by the ect's size. umber °f adjusted
County d by the developing pre feet (TGSF), n that were
Gross squat e The current rates
,ts value is determ►nThousand early basis.
Uril ressed as adjusted on a Y
typically ex , etc g y
employees' the TIF Ordinance and m y be 0 er average eek ~y rip
Tri set by $226.0 P average w trip
rate value is $57 •p0 per av e weekday trip
1, 2001 are. ,207.00 Per averag gekdaY trip
on July rnercial Use
Residential and Use Com X217 00 Per average w . ted average daily
Business and ~gq .00 per weigh
Office Use 17.00 ~
Industrial Use 42
institutional Use
Transit Rate
For Example:
A 20,400 square foot office building's TIF would be calculated as follows:
20.400 (TGSF) x 16.31 (Weekday Average trips) x 207.00 = $68,874 Total TIF
Then
To determine the Mass Transit portion of the TIF
20.400 x 16.31 = 333 (Trip Generation)
Then
Trip Generation x Transit Rate = Transit Amount
333 x 17 = $5,661
Then
Total TIF - Transit Amount = Road Amount
68,874.00 - 5,661.00 = 63,213.00
This is how a basic TIF is calculated. TIF calculations can become more complex as other factors are included in the
calculation. Those factors could be credits and offsets, weighted averages or uses not listed in the table provided by
Washington County Ordinance.
43
~1
L~.~a w p,T eR SDC The
mom OLOGY S® CALCl1 e and improvem ca facity in the
ME~NO® entfe p needed to
reimbursert' or available) ents n F
rised °f a rowh-related future imPfo\'
e ~SDC)'s cornsciated w►th theacity-increasing
ent Charg cover t costs as °f cap
pevelopm the costs
S stem to re is based on
water Y
The ent fee is intended
improvement fee is
reimburse stem, and the existing system, of gwo des the following four steps
meet the ent fee inclu
ent Fee. the r6,mbufsem
Reimbursem eVelop
al methodolagY used to d
The gene[ ov,1th.related capaciwA
r Tigand water
the value of g achy date for the
1 Determine ac~tyof growth -related cad ed Dwelling pnit) to meet Charge
2, Up
Define system cap Per SOU tEstim tern Deve p , information
3 Calculate[ the unit cost bursement fee p complete a System following
Develop CH2M Hill to a sis and calculated
nd hired analY
the City °f -1,93 ,d an extensive
In 2000, The firm perlorm uivalent Factor
system Meter E
1
Mete 2.5
518 - 314 inch 3,6
1 inch 8
1 +/z inch 15
2 inch 25
3 inch 50
4 inch 80
6 inch 140
8 inch 380
10 inch
12 inch
44
er day t9pol $0.87
ent per 9 allons pd gpd) ~c) _ 645 the SDC. The calculawn15
Net investor ent SDC Per EDU
I
Mailmum pay water Deman (ent P°rtion o and 16451
' Reimbursem
to calculate the rei.~mum pmbursemay water Dem '
This data is used
ent Per gPd (0.87} X ma x - $56~ .00
Net investor ent SDC per EDU each meter
bursem SpC for
Current Reim size
en ~ Meter Equivalent Factor = Reimbursement
Th rsement SDC Per EDt, x
'22imbu 402.
ample inch meters rsement fee, and includes
561~°r EX 00 X2.5 (meter equivalent far A milar to that for the reimbu
nt Fee: the imPrOVement fee is s~
Im roveme used to develop
eneral methodology ents
The g four steps related l imPCQVem
the following rowth- cPa acity
the costs of of additiona
~ petermine the unit cost
~t service credit DU
2. Calculate deb ent fee Per E
3 Calculate rovem per EDU to be.
4 pevelop imP d the improvernent fees
CH2M VOI calculate $880.00 - $600.00
lmpr0vement F ee - 410 ZonE; - , 322.00
u ly ent Fee tam . $
water S pp S stem ImProvem ent fee gu11 Moun
button y ImProvem co,,t per meter size
&,,rtribut'on System
d to calculate the
pis
fi ures are then use 45
These 9
LEG1131LITY 5TRIP
Water supply for =Water Supply Improvement Fee for each meter size
improvement Fee x Meter Equivalent Factor
For Example:
0,00 x 2.5 (meter equivalent for 1 inch meter) _ $2,200.0 improvement for
Zone x Meter Equivalent Factor =Water Distribution System
Distribu88 lmp
tion system improvement Fee 410
each 410 Zone meter size
For Example:
1,500.00 ' stem Improvement
600.00 x 2.5 (meter equivalent for 1 inch meter) _
Distribution system improvement Fee Bull Mountain x Meter Equivalent Factor =Water Distribution Sy
for each Bull Mountain meter size
For Example:
,322.00 x 2.5 (meter equivalent for 1 inch meter) _ $3,305.00
1
Final SDC Charge; per meter size.
are added together to get the total Water SDC charge p
The totals listed above Improvement Fee for each meter size + Water Distribution
Reimbursement SDC for each meter size + W ate
apply system improvement for each 410 Zone meter size
= Total Water SDC charge per meter size for 410 Zone
For Example:
= $5,102.50 rounds to $5,103.00
,402.50 + 2,200.00+1,500.00
1
Or 46
...M=~ M-- I
Reimbursement SDC for each meter size + Water Supply Improvement Fee for each meter size + Water Distribution
System Improvement for each Bull Mountain meter size
= Total Water SDC charge per meter size for Bull Mountain
For Example:
1,402.50 + 2,200.00+3,305.00= $6,907.50 rounds to $6,908.00
' For more detailed information on calculating Park SDC, see Resolution No. 01-12 and the accompanying report "Park and Recreation Facilities
System Development Charges" by Economic Resource Associates, Inc., March 1, 2001.
"For more detailed information about Water SDC charges, please see Resolution No. 00-66 and its accompanying report, "Tigard Water System,
System Development Charge Update" by CH2M Hill, September 1, 2000.
This value is based on the system's non-contributed depreciated plant investment.
This cost is based on anticipated future project costs.
47
v c
w z
or 0~
June 16, 2003
TO: PGE Cities
FROM: Ken Strobeek
RE: Purchase of PGE
On May 30 the League received a draft governance proposal for PGE from the City ofortland.
The League's Board of Directors has briefly reviewed the proposal and the League has requested
a meeting with Portland to further discuss the issues raised in the document. Meanwhile, another
governance proposal has been presented by a coalition of Counties within the PGE service
territory. It is the League's understanding that neither proposal has been accepted by the City of
Portland. Discussions are ongoing to craft a proposal that has the support of all stakeholders.
Enron is expected to further clarify the final disposition of PGE on June 30. However, the time
frame for finalizing a governance structure in the event that Portland purchases PGE is still
unclear.
In our role as a communication facilitator between the City of Portland and the other 49 cities
served by PGE, we would like your response to the proposed governance structure, which is
attached. Also attached is a letter to Portland City Commissioner Erik Sten containing the
League's initial comments. Because the time frame is short, please forward your comments to
the League by meat Tuesday, June 24.
The following represents our preliminary assessment of the draft governance proposal:
Structure and Responsibilities:
The current proposal outlines a structure in which the League would nominate a city
representative to the Advisory Council. The Portland City Council would then take the
nomination from the League and put together an Advisory Council comprised of various
stakeholders. The Advisory Council would then forward a pool of candidates to the Portland
City Council as possible members of the Governing Board. The Portland City Council and
Mayor would be responsible for appointing the Board members from that pool of candidates. It
is unclear whether the City Council or Mayor would make the final appointment decision.
The Governance Board would be comprised of members with technical expertise, while the
Advisory Council would be made up of various stakeholders. The Advisory Council would be
the only place with assured direct city representation. The Advisory Council would give policy
input to the Board. The Board would make policy decisions, manage and operate the utility.
Ultimately the City of Portland worild be fiscally responsible for the utility and retain certain
rights and responsibilities regarding utility decisions.
The following are issues for your cor;sideration and outstanding questions regarding the proposal:
1) From a policy perspective would the stakeholders outlined as members on the Advisory
Council work better as the Board?
2) If the stakeholders comprise the Board and staff provides the expertise, is the Advisory
Council necessary?
3) If the current structure remains the same (i.e. Board and Advisory Council as outlined) would
it be prudent to require X % of Board members to be elected members from outside the City
of Portland? This would require adding a local governance qualification to the list of Board
expertise.
4) Under the current proposal the League would nominate one member to the Advisory Council,
but play no direct role in appointing membership to either the Advisory Council or the
Governing Board. Should the League Board of Directors appoint city membership directly?
5) In addition to other stakeholders, the current structure of the Advisory Council includes two
members nominated by the seven counties served by PGE, one member nominated by the
League, and one member nominated by the City of Portland. There are currently 50 cities
served by PGE. At a minimum should the League nominate two members?
Outstanding questions:
o How will this agreement be memorialized so that cities and others understand how the utility
will be governed?
• How will the governance structure be classified (i.e. municipal utility) and what statutory
requirements will it fall under?
• The proposal does not indicate that the utility will fall under the open meetings law
requirements.
o How will franchise fees and/or payments in lieu of taxes be applied to cities and/or counties?
o Further clarification of the Governing Board staff roles and responsibilities and how utility
functions (i.e. customer service, 3% public purpose funding) will be handled.
Your response to the preliminary assessment and identification of any other outstanding issues is
appreciated. The League looks forward to working with you to craft this critical governance
structure.
Thank you in advance for your quick response. If you have questions, please contact either
A* drea Fogue or me by phone at (503) 588-6550 or by e-mail at kstrobeck@orcities.org or
afogug (@orcities.org.
t
June 11, 2003
The Honorable Erik Sten
Portland City Commissioner
Address
Portland, OR Zip
Dear Commissioner Sten:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the draft governance proposal for the purchase
of PGE. Cities across Oregon, particularly those currently served by PGE are extremely
interested in the outcome of the purchase discussion. The League of Oregon Cities
remains committed to facilitating a dialogue between cities and other local governments
on this critical issue.
The following comments and questions are preliminary feedback on the draft governance
proposal forwarded to the League by your staff on May 30, 2003. The proposal has been
briefly discussed by the League's Board of Directors but not yet vetted with cities served
by PGE.
Comments
I would like to further explore and discuss the following:
• Structure and roles of the Governing Board, Advisory Council, and staff.
• Balancing the need for technical and policy expertise.
• Role of the League in nominating or appointing membership to the Governing Board
and Advisory Council.
• Appropriate city representation on the Governing Board and Advisory Council.
• Further clarification of the Governing Board staff roles and responsibilities and how
utility functions (i.e. customer service, 3% public purpose funding) will be handled.
s Further clarification of the appointment process between the Portland City Council
and the Mayor.
esti 6 s
• • How will this agreement be memorialized so that cities and others understand how
i the utility will be governed?
• How will the governance structure be classified (i.e. municipal utility) and what
statutory requirements will it fall under?
• How will franchise fees and/or payments in lieu of taxes be applied to cities and/or
counties?
• Will the utility fall under the open meetings law requirements?
• What time frame are we working within to establish a governance structure?
I understand that there is a separate agreement under discussion between Portland and the
Regional Power Study Group outlining a potential structure and governing principles to
operate PGE. I would like the opportunity to discuss both proposals with you before you
move forward with approval.
The League looks forward to participating in the dialogue as the issues evolve and
continuing to engage cities served by PGE. I am available to discuss our initial
comments and questions with you and your staff at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Ken. L. Strobeck
Executive Director
Draft Governance Structure
for
a Publicly-owned Electric Utility
This draft proposal is intended to advance discussions of a governance structure
for a City-owned electric utility. The draft outlines key issues and proposes
scenarios as a starting point for conversation and does not necessarily
represent any position by the City of Portland.
Governing Board
Member Profile
The governing Board is comprised of nine members who serve staggered four-
year terms. The initial appointments will be for terms of one, two, three, and
four years to ensure continuity as their terms expire.
Collectively, Board members will have expertise in:
• electric utility management and operations
• West Coast energy markets
• Northwest electric utility issues, including access to BPA preference
power and other Bonneville issues
• advanced power technologies
• large business operations
• environmental issues
• finance
• legal
9
Appointment Process
Board members are appointed by the Mayor of Portland from a pool of nominees
proposed by the Advisory Council (described on page three). Appointments are
confirmed by the Portland City Council. The Board Chair is elected by members
of the Board. Board seats are not full-time positions, but members are paid for
their time and expenses. Board members may serve up to two terms (eight
years).
Governance proposal page 1
DRAFT, May 7, 2003
Board Responsibilities
The Board is responsible to manage and operate the utility. The Board has the
authority to:
• set rates, including rate structure;
• set levels and types of service;
o acquire power;
• operate and maintain the system;
• expand the system into new areas;
• establish processes for public participation in its decisions;
• designate the use of system revenue that exceeds current
requirements for payment of costs of operation, maintenance and debt
service; and
• hire and fire Board staff
The Board reports quarterly to provide an opportunity for members of the public
to comment on the performance of the utility and Board.
Decision-making process
The Board deliberates publicly and provides an opportunity for the public to
comment. After decisions are made, the public has the right to request another
hearing on the issue to present new information or present an alternate view. In
addition, the Board provides for a consumer advocate role to investigate rate
setting. The consumer advocate may challenge rates and how they are derived.
Governing Board Staff
Board staff are public employees under the direction of a general manager who
reports to the Board. Staff functions can be divided into three levels:
1) a general manager and core staff responsible for rate design and
regulatory affairs
2) senior management of planning and operations
3) utility functions, including such areas as power supply, transmission
and distribution operations, customer service, and financial and legal
services.
While the general manager and core staff responsible for rate design and
regulatory affairs are public employees, senior management and all other utilit;'
functions may be done in-house or contracted out.
Governance proposal Page 2
DRAM May 7, 2003
Advisory Council
Membership
The Advisory Council is comprised of nine members representing customers and
key stakeholders. Members are appointed by Portland City Council and
nominated as follows:
• one member representing business customers (nominated by Associated
Oregon Industries)
• one member representing residential customers (nominated by the
Citizens' Utility Board)
• one member representing industrial customers (nominated by the
Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities)
• one member representing issues of social equity (nominated by
• one member representing environmental interests (nominated by
• two members nominated by Clackamas, Marion, Multnomah, Polk,
Washington, and Yamhill Counties
• one member nominated by the League of Oregon Cities
• one member nominated by the City of Portland
Members serve two-year terms and may be re-appointed. There are no term
limits.
Responsibilities
The Advisory Council nominates candidates for the governing Board and
nominates twice as many candidates as available Board seats. Portland City
Council then appoints Board members from this pool of candidates.
The Advisory Council provides input to the Board on policy decisions and
significant, non-routine issues affecting utility management and operations.
Portland City Council
Responsibilities
City Council has a fiduciary obligation to repay the bonds used to acquire the
utility system. To comply with the bond covenants, City Council retains the
following authority:
1. The right to determine minimum levels of system operations and service
necessary to operate the system prudently. (The Board may choose to
require higher levels of operations and service.)
Governance proposal Page 3
DRAFT, May 7, 2003
2. The right to determine the minimum level of capital maintenance and
replacement for the system.
3. The right to determine the minimum annual gross revenue requirement for
the system.
4. The right to take actions for the system that City Council reasonably
determines are necessary to comply with the City' s bond covenants.
City Council also retains:
1. The right of eminent domain.
2. Final approval of the electric utility budget, as recommended by the Board.
3. The responsibility to issue bonds.
4. The responsibility to make financial investments for the electric utility.
5. The responsibility to ensure that a minimum of three percent of revenues are
dedicated to energy conservation, low-income weatherization programs, and
renewable resource development.
6. The responsibility to allow large customers to choose direct market access
for electricity supply.
Gavermance PraPOsAl Page 4
DRAFT, May 7, 2003
Draft Comments on the Proposed Governance Structure
for PGE
It is not yet clear whether the proposed Portland-Owned PGE (POPGE) would be a
municipal utility in fact under Oregon law, but it is clear that it will operate in such a
manner. If POPGE is operating like a municipal utility, then citizens served by this new
utility should have a greater say in the governance of this entity than is provided for in
the current proposal. Specifically, if the citizens of Portland are unhappy with any of the
policies of the new board, they presumably have redress through their elected officials
(the Portland City Council) to challenge or modify those polices. But citizens of Tigard,
or any other area served by POPGE, have no similar redress. This is wrong. The
proposed governance structure, therefore does not work.
■ The Proposed Board of Directors should be appointed by the governing bodies of
the counties served and the City of Portland. Board seats could either be a set
number for each appointing authority, or proportional according to the number of
customers in that jurisdiction. It would be appropriate for Portland to appoint the
Chair of the Board.
Nowhere is the Proposed Governing Structure does it say whether the appointing
authority can remove Board Members before the end of their terms for cause or
otherwise. It might be wise to allow Board members to be removed under certain
circumstances.
■ Expertise for Board members is specified, but there is no requirement that
appointments actually be made according to that criteria. If certain expertise is
required on the Board, it may be wise to tighten up this section more.
■ The role of the Advisory Board is amorphous. Other than nominating a pool of
candidates for the Board, it has no set responsibilities. If appointment authority
for the Board is modified as suggested here, the role of the Advisory Board in
nominating a pool of candidates may have to be re-examined, and perhaps
significantly altered or eliminated.
There is a significant role that could be filled by an Advisory Committee. All
proposed rate adjustments could be taken to the Advisory Committee for review
and comment or approval prior to being acted upon by the Board. In addition,
the Advisory Committee could function as the Budget Committee for POPGE,
reviewing and approving the Manager's Proposed Budget before presentation to
the Board of Directors. The Advisory Committee could also (as explained in the
Proposed Governing Structure) review and comment on significant policy and
operational issues.
® The Board of Directors should have independent authority to adopt POPGE's
annual budget and issue debt secured by the revenues of POPGE.
Agenda Item No. 3.
Meeting of
COUNCIL MINUTES
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 17, 2003
1. WORKSHOP MEETING
1.1 Mayor Griffith called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
1.2 Roll Call: Mayor Griffith and Councilors Dirksen, Moore, Sherwood, and
Wilson were present.
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports: None
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non Agenda Items: None
2. REPORT ON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TRENDS IN THE CITY AND
URBAN SERVICES AREA
Community Development Director Hendryx reviewed this agenda item. Typical
development today is different from that of 10 years ago. Large lot development
is no longer the norm in the community. Mr. Hendryx presented information
about current development trends in the City of Tigard and Urban Services area.
A detailed memo from Mr. Hendryx to the Council on Development Trends is on
d
file with the City Recorder and is also a part of the Council packet information that
has been posted on the City's web site.
During Council discussion, Councilor Wilson suggested that parking requirements
for residential development be reviewed to determine whether it's adequate.
3. DISCUSSION ON THE TIGARD FESTIVAL OF BALLOONS
Councilor Moore reported that he had talked with Balloon Festival Organizer Bruce
g Ellis about plans for the 2004 Balloon Festival. Mr. Ellis indicated that he is
confident he will have a local major media sponsor for the event next year. Mr.
Ellis was open to the idea of focusing on the Balloon portion of the festival and
working with local balloonists. He was also agreeable to solicit help from
i organizations and individuals to take responsibility for other portions of the festival.
A planning meeting will be organized soon by City staff to discuss the
reorganization of the planning for this event.
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - June 17, 2003 Page 1
4. DISCUSSION OF UPDATING CERTAIN FEES IN THE MASTER FEES AND
CHARGES SCHEDULE
Finance Director Craig Prosser introduced this agenda item outlining staff
recommendations to update the Master Fees and Charges Schedule and amend
certain fees.
Park Manager Dan Plaza presented information on the proposed park reservation
fees and charges increases. After discussion, Council consensus was to support the
schedule of fees and charges that will recover 70% of program costs.
A detailed memo from Mr. Plaza to the Council on the recommendation to
increase park fees and charges is on file with the City Recorder and is also a part of
the Council packet information that has been posted on the City's web site.
Building Official Gary Lampella reviewed information on the proposed mechanical
fee increase. Council consensus was to support the proposed increase. A detailed
memo from Mr. Lampella to the Council on the proposed mechanical fee increase
is on file with the City Recorder and is also a part of the Council packet
information that has been posted on the City's web site. In addition, an open
house explaining the proposed fee increase will be held in the Tigard Town Hall on
June 18, 6:30 p.m.
Budget 8i Financial Reporting Analyst Michelle Wareing reviewed the fee schedule
and summarized the proposed fee changes. Council consensus was to support the
proposed changes. The new schedule will be presented to Council for adoption at
the June 24, 2003, Council meeting. The draft of the Master Fees and Charges
schedule is on file with the City Recorder and is also part of the Council packet
information that has been posted on the City's web site.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
Assistant to the City Manager Newton reviewed the following:
• Indonesian delegation will arrive in Tigard tomorrow. Delegates will attend the
June 24, 2003, Council meeting
• City tours for Councilors Sherwood and Wilson
o June 26, 8-10 a.m. at Public Works and 10 a.m.-12 p.m. at Engineering
o July 14 (afternoon) Community Development 8Z Library Tours
• Update on Martin court case - The Oregon Supreme Court declined to hear
two pending appeals. Once the Circuit Court issues its order, the Dartmouth
Local Improvement District fee assessment will be due and payable to the City.
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - June 17, 2003 Page 2
. Health insurance open enrollment Senior Human Resources Analyst Sherrie
Burbank will be available for Council questions before the June 24 City
Council meeting (6 p.m.).
Street maintenance fee update - The Transportation Financing Strategies Task
Force and representatives of the business community will meet on June 19,
6:30 p.m., in the Town Hall.
• Governance structure for proposed publicly owned electric utility Finance
Director Prosser reviewed this item relating to the City of Portland's
consideration of purchase of PGE. Mr. Prosser noted a number of concerns
including how a board of directors should be appointed, appointment criteria
for directors, the appearance that there are no set responsibilities assigned to
the advisory board, and the inability for all citizens served by this utility to have
a greater say in the governance of the utility. After discussion, Council agreed
that the Mayor should sign a letter addressed to the League of Oregon Cities
outlining the City's concerns. A copy of this letter will be forwarded to the
City Council.
Questions on Bull Mountain Study - Council had received a draft copy of this
study on June 10. Points of discussion included questions about what benefits
there would be to Bull Mountain residents if they were annexed. Increased
police protection and maintenance of streets at an urban level were two
advantages. Council also discussed whether cities are subsidizing rural areas of
the County. This item will be discussed further at the July 8, 2003, Council
meeting.
7. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS: None
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Not held
9. ADJOURNMENT: 8:13 p.m.
a eri a eat ey, i ecor
Attest:
C
-I
i or, i o r
i
i
Date: ~a a~o3
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - June 17, 2003 Page 3
W WVLCAY
i Plate n i r
C,WY-1 rY ASM
~jg +0 sa^f4
EL
-
IF&W ARM
Zf-3 .1
VP& tole