The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 05/27/2003 3 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 27, 2003 COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED H:4ewv%W%d=%ccpW 13125 SW Hail Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 MD (503) 684-2772 t .w GreenSce SPECIAL EDITION August 2001 F ~I s d ~ I I' a m . W J n' MF-TRO PEOPLE PLACES OPEN SPACES On the cover Clockwise from top left - Lowami Hart Woods Park, Beaverton; view of Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge, Portland; Boeckman Creek Crossing Trail, Wilsonville; canoeing on the Tualatin River L Based on the Metropolitan Greenspaces Master ties throughout the region. Land for future parks, Plan adopted by Metro in 1992, bond measure expansion of existing parks, trails, picnic facilities, funds support land acquisition from willing sellers campgrounds, boat launches and habitat restora- to begin laying the foundation for a regional tion are among the 102 projects supported by greenspaces system in 14 target areas and six $25 million of the bond funds. As you read about greenway corridors. To date, Metro purchased the projects in your area as well as other projects, more than 7,000 acres around the metropolitan you will begin to see how they work together to region (see map below). The land provides habitat bring greater benefits to the metropolitan region for fish and wildlife, contributes to watershed for fish, wildlife and people. health, softens the urban landscape and, in some cases, will become a future nature park or corridor Imagine an interconnected system of trails and for a regional trail. greenways reaching around and outward, tying greenspace to greenspace, neighborhood to Bond measure funds also were invested in local neighborhood and city to city. Like hiking itself, county and city park improvements and open building this park and greenspace system will space acquisition. This special edition of Metro proceed one step at a time. A lot has been accom- GreenScene highlights what has been accom- plished, but a lot remains to be done to establish plished by the 26 local park service agencies to and protect a greenspaces legacy for ourselves meet the park and recreation needs of communi- and future generations. o ; Open spaces, parks and I$ MU AH streams bond measure CHAN K~ regional target areas BU1RttNGTON OgFCh/ 1,01V 1205 NORTHERN TRAIL 01 Y Vancouver L 11 PE LA rj X16 CROSSING aaPR:o FOREST PARK TRAIL EX~AISION W Fs ! M ak d. JACYSON BOTYOt1J Falrvie DAIRY/MCKAY L _ •aa Wood Troutdale Forest CREEKS Hillsboro ROCK CREEK I Portland rove a GREENWAY Village BEAVER C n lius CREEK GALES TVALATwvgLLEY~ POWELL BLVD. Gresham CANYON CR OMSI TO GREENWAYI TUALATI Beaverton INGWATER EAST BUTTES/ RIVER ACCESS FANNO CREEK I RRIDOR BORING LAVA SANDY ~TKIAHs[oo RIVER = - GREENWAY --DOMES GORGE r - I COOPER Tigard J TRYON Milwaukie MOUNTAIN King _ Happy ; City LINKAGES Valley 1 WA%ONGTINCO. TU Johnson CLACKAMAS rarnmL CO. -7 RIVER AC TUaIaGn w Durham I 01 a0k e City /-RIVER Oswego GR ENWAY ! Gla stone axka i Tualatin fiver oveA~, I est 1.2os Linn CLEAR CREEK I Sherwood = Oregon City CANYON ---I 8 T NQUI NEWELL - G OLOGIC WILLAMETTE CANEMAH CANYON i ¢r+' i AREA Wilsonville NARROWS BLUFF 3 0 merle Rive d1` MaagN co r` I Simlegal e ` l(mcl s - c. Beaverton it I99i. I ;-ccar-old \latt The grccnspacc, Graff \s'rote a letter to the features it Douglas fir ' t Bcalcrton C6 Council forest and \vctlands, is the pomtrng out him dark. last ren,aininl-~ piece of the narmlc :uul dangerous it \loshofskl fanub's r' teas n, get through the heritage fared and orignnll - tl•ooded area ale,ng Willo%% land Chun]. I he former Creek that separates his propcrt) (m'ncr rrntent- honte in the \Icrrllood bl•I'cll looking for frogs t neighborhood front the alum the creel: When Ill' Stottcgatc and \\•atrrhousc \%a', young. ;\Ithottgh neighl,orhoods- The cit. blackhcrrics hide ell- started working %%ith the cronchcd on the north sick -1-u:tlatin I fills Park and of the creek and require Recreation District and srnttc restu,ratir,n, the rest completed an inlporteu,t of the land is Ill good _ grcenspacc cunnccnott in condition. m- 1 y . The propcrtl could h.tlc I he sel'rtt is Dueled acres become more holism}; nr :1CquiI-Cd in the Will(AV an esp;Utston Uf local Crcck grccnmac now cununcrcial drtcluprncnt. serve :,s it natural public But the letter front it bung - corridor connecting I58th citiml in I99i bcg;ul it to 17 ord. A new Path I,rocess that led to the includes a unilrrsalll protection of this I Ill. ble w .tccessihle bo:,rdlcalk from grec•nspac(2. To)dal people beginning to end. living in the conunuoM c;u, boast of their green anu•ntn grid connections n, moire. Arboretum Park Cornelius Arboretum Park is ❑ Railroad liar in the ••I,uckrt hark." a tine Cornelia, Main Street r _ breath of pleasant green district. ARBORETUM. C(micn ep;i„ Cornelius. The park was Bond ntrasure• funds \s•rrc t landscaped with natter used to :,cquire the site and P A R plts and completed with allow this open space to help from cite staff and become it green part of the i 1•olunteers front such dolennt~~ n area to help I ~ groups as the Cornelius encourage rrl italization of ` Parks Commission and the the Main Street district. Cornelius B(mstcr Club, The park complies with the Formerly a lacam lot, the Americans With Disabili- . park is located between tics Act and hosts it Tri- liaselittc Road and the \let bus stop. Burlington-Northern 6 T,~ Hagg Lake Picnic Area Forest Grove vicinity ` Sain Creek on the south shore of Hagg Lake is the location of a new picnic area that includes 130 parking spaces, restrooms, - 50 picnic sites with paved pads, an open area for 50 _ to 75 people and a large covered pavilion for full- service catering with water, power and lights. The site is accessible for people with disabilities and in- cludes a network of paved pathways and easy access from the parking area. ] y "Everything is very acces- Rood Bridge Park sible now. The area is also Hillsboro supported by a new system for drinking water," says Located at the confluence -n Chris Wayland, Washing- of Rock Creek and the ton County parks supervi- Tualatin River, Rood sor. These new picnic Bridge Park is nearly facilities were part of a complete. With help from 1989 master plan for the partners such as Clean park. The bond measure Water Services (formerly funds helped make it Unified Sewerage Agency), happen." Hillsboro Rotary Club, the The pavilion sits on a Baker Family Trust and point of land and offers a funds from the bond panoramic view of the lake measure, natural features below. It has become a of the park were improved popular place for wed- to provide visitors oppor- i tunities to picnic, hike, dings and other large bike and canoe. The upper portions of the Scott Talbot of Hillsboro group events. Reservations park feature parking, Parks notes, "More and L are required and it is The two waterways are restrooms and viewpoints more people are excited 2 recommended to call early major features of the park. of the Tualatin floodplain, about what Rood Bridge for its use. A new canoe launch to the The park now offers Park has to offer." Tualatin River was built. A assorted natural terrains J Hagg Lake and surround- paved universal-access that support abundant p near ing Sco Forrest est Grove Valley in Par the k is path leads to the lower wildlife and recreation 0 a portions of the park and opportunities. eastern foothills of the ~ connects to trails across coast range. Managed by Rock Creek. Native Washington County, the vegetation was planted to 2,600-acre park offers improve habitat and more than 15 miles of protect the greenway hiking and biking trails corridors. around the lake, as well as ) picnicking, boating, fishing ,.a;:.. and swimming. Tualatin River Greenway Tualatin Access to the Tualatin of Tualatin was able to River Greenway has move quickly to protect become easier as a result of properties that were some key greenspace subject to additional purchases along the river. residential development For example, Brown's along the river. Ferry Park is now 4 acres larger and includes river All three of the new land access. The home on the purchases help in the effort property serves as the to connect other public Brown's Ferry Community open space and protect the Center. Paved and gravel greenway as a whole. pathways with interpretive ~.x signs, restored wetlands, "The new acquisitions picnic areas and parking have helped protect the give visitors many ways to greenway and increase the enjoy the site and Tualatin number of park services River. offered in Tualatin," says Paul Henson, director of " Working with Metro, community services. d6dik along with funding from the bond measure, the city Salish Fonds and its wildlife. In addition i to the trails, the park _ Wetland includes a fishing dock, footbridges, picnic areas, _ Park viewing platforms and interpretive signs. Habitat Fairview improvements were made by restoring native vegeta- Fairview Creek, two tion. ponds with emergent cattails and an Oregon ash "It's a phenomenal place. woodland are prominent We get a lot of positive in this 70-acre wetland comments about it," says park. Established with John Andersen, Fairview wildlife in mind, the planning director. "A greenspace is home to a nature park such as this C variety of wildlife includ- will serve as an important ing herons, waterfowl, environmental education hawks, owls, songbirds, resource to the two j raccoons, coyote, deer, adjacent schools and and Fieldstone corpora- frogs, snakes and more. others. Teachers, students tions. Funding from the d. and volunteers will be bond measure and the help i Better yet, trails connect involved in learning about of volunteers from SOLO, nearby schools, neighbor- and managing the site for LSI Logic, local Boy hoods and Fairview City years to come. The place is Scouts, schools and the Hall to the nature park to only going to get better." Oregon Department of offer people the opportu- Fish and Wildlife were nity to study, understand The property for the park critical to the success of the and appreciate wetlands was donated to the city by project. Mike McKeel, Tektronics 10 i 90111C - ; ( Local Community Greenspace Projects 9 I I v.•~ Funded by the Open Spaces, 1 Parks and Streams Bond Measure of 1995 r 1 j v 61-d fq iV• I ~N ,~45 /r,d5 METRO Metro Data Resource Center 1 941 Fr at II' 600 NORTHEAST GRAND AVE PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 Vancouver te1(503)797.1742 fax (503) 107.1009 Nrtsu: tt Banks _ si \~•el7ry~k\~~r dm@rnetroAst.orms www..metro-region.org/dre I / c 1 i ` -•l..r"', _~'r { ' cRU ll~let r~t"IJ4r~ I•. .?s•, -i~~ P ' Nerveda NoM Oda " l_••_ S ..pv'. ix`* Ty Pmdnd ti i,v~., rana6 ) I ey ° k -.~,Intcm'nlwnal 'h, ~r _ C ~Q 3I ~ * J" c 4Irpon ~V A 1. 0 Washougal r^.y~~=•^i'i. i~w '•,'I I ~:t 4J2 Mnd \ •v„`s, trti'n. , V 1 V , ~ 1 ~;wai pr .,q Va~m ~ ~i 4; ~~t~ 34 ~ . t ~ vatmn ; n' p + ti, ' .'I Marood'~uv t t t. ly: ~ ; a L '2~r A i'I '1'2[k &tp q~25. -_x~+ Re !Leland I r Y v. Ha 1. a. t s Fairview r1a p~ tt ' »I ~7; 42 - is ~i f~~~ 4'. ~T Nf f uaxum ''j T A!5a41. 55iT 0utC53` ) - Su iti Cu9An i _ , : A 1 a ;;I r~ 52 G rest ~'9IDC~1 ~lsorc, lt7TJ,i 7A Portland•,.. dues st r ! Vn D AW, s....~-..~~ ~ ~wswehax"x -Y 1 r4 1 t t M 18 I t Zi..- . T j111 F t r f eAC~ 37' IMl 9P•eNedile rov ; ,i~~~~`Sea}-t ~rv rx } _ 0B .~I .fit dti ,A',~ j 19'r £lti✓c' E Gresham 1 e AQi,r ~l I LmE l Eli ~9 .a0 `fin: 'fi'r: 1 A}3~.: "mr~'• aYr 6 wti . i ~W_- 1 ,fr PonNt o I 42 .j •~26 .i~K 4~~~ r 115 IIO d I . ~r 42 P8 ILA ~ 541 11 - er; SN A }BUtrv e ;lauscue~5 U, 43 a: I~• 49 •y£ti r i M t i r xJ~ F.', } 30 I'adA , Beaverton . i I 42 32 z 56 3g!T i 2J ~9! ~4J~ J i { Jr~1~N ? 3,ti 42 1~~~ O 1$ rk•aa: r .:Y _ , _ t M E 6oa~ev t 5' '32 ' A I 5 ••'r Courc9 s~ sm n -J . .tI s {I I : ~-~a Milwasukle ss vner 5. ~ 42 ~ s w, n 3 J 701 ._,J ~iw~ Y AEOIONAI "NO INA ORNAiION SYSTEM J 0 t~~ ti E+, M}2 r en~V 65 t ' 4f ~i P9 t. I J u,.I '~nrr. 1 6 O.Ne i N N P°" 2U Tigard ri d J W" 212 f 7 - 1T8t°I~22 d' ~I Lake 5J L E V E I~w<kaod AUO_ a 1 r.., ti s wego s M'!]IL.! gj Local Greenspace 4e I(;Eg s7 1 Lohnson Protects cr 4 lla N t•f ) Y '4 i t fi5 ty e e Jb>nm a 12 P 9 lha"' t I A 77 se .1 H Nun Sandy Urban Growth I t. r 76 -i~e1d"ve 61 one pe' ' Boundary na)atin : 23 m ~H `H I fi~d'A C :M u.. • X56 kr Fit A T 6s A• Metro Regional Bond I Me C , ti74 yA Measure Acquisitions West l.. " . ~p~ j~ Linn f 7s rr t" 1 h'Y and Traillmprovements herwood ~ cc~ 3 re"..~' ~ EaEle dlmd Rek A • Existing Public Parks _ _ un,•••r,,,c r. s~ N i~ ` fi~ J and Open Space ~ ~ ~ ; "i~ I Oregon : City ~ Updated July 31, 2001 t N t 75emfix-dmmfo9mprrr6dvd5om . j Ay,l dlpoldmEAfamrde6a'A06.CNN*m `A ~~~~~7~,yt s,~ 1s' tkNrP !t mdeamtimordirmp, A4tomadsaep k; 40 ramaNamiAimNaWro°0d ~ T 1 ~I ~ .il~J;, ~ \ I ma n( 1 ( 82118 s q ~4~ ~k -E mavermH~mmlrmMTl7 ' a~6ipPE~'~Pmf'01 1 7I 79{ " ~...sl , my PNyNf.IWimN4mdltmimolmraraE +^,•-~„~..^i.. I i ln,l#...i ; k.,w• ~l EstAG4da ` i j.1`e t, 9 .N 0 1 3 J 1 Ataa Project descriptions on pages 14 and 15 13 4 _ ~ prQ~ects Creenspac i 1 CO 11'nu11 O pd Spaces,o 1995 ii- J, LOCH Funded by the pd NleasuYe f parks and strear $ / x gT RO C611101 to RegolYtCe Ce', v, GON 97232 D Metro Da ve pO s3 7sr.1}eoeo~drD EAteltt3st~o us wN'+r.matto- NORTH M dtca' ~jat►cOuver `4~. 't °/andzt•`~'~,..:~,,~•^::°.~-"„~ e~tassewac+!nrr'iallas ~.w 11 ?ku`~'`~`".t` 5'Y Poritan~ al• 1 ? ,Qb s• Y - R-'j WanJ Rc } a ~ ,&a,nln~p,~~~ Cbe' Q'iSD ST ft .'e'+ ,i WR,K y. +WJ004 &W Li ' 4'~, `'~1 1`~pr~wa'TL( ~atl .~Q' 2y . 0- Fkt~•~.,,\ ~ , t.. etipO 2 W,V11Lag4 1 ~ - -:r X, • ~ a„R,smE Gtesb3ll' ytiD~~ nd,c 5~ , ,tk BLVD ar $3' t M A .rim r 4.. iRu w r .a c ,l r lvti ~ Scc IV i r,Milwauki~ . ^ sa 't hi~ "au r , Sandy 2,2 bAsot, t/ t Sry~ '1\., SF Glads~~n M 6wve -n NV W '=1"~ R`dl" dM, A 1 < _ _ 4s. Z USA'' t; 1 . 9a J i Qtegot?O~S," Cip 1 AG +y.4 i 3• ~ t 'r -y„~.,~ r ~ ~ /~~da _-ter J . tt'~t4, e i 14 and 15 i bons on pages - c " ` Project descr p 44. Portland, Springwater Trail S3. Troutdale, Beaver Creek 63. Gladstone Acquired 0.6- 74. Oregon City, Clackamette Corridor Acquired 2.6 acres Canyon Removed invasive acre greenspace on Valley Park Boat ramp improve- at Southeast 86th Avenue species and restored habitat View Road for future ments, parking, new and 1.5 acres at Southeast with native vegetation neighborhood park restroom and park 174th Avenue for future perimeter trail trailhead access Rhc (ft 1: yy S4. Troutdale vicinity, Oxbow 64. Gladstone/Milwaukie T' Regional Park New water vicinity, Portland Traction 75. Oregon City Acquired 4S. Portland, North Portland and distribution system, Company right-of-way streamside properties along trails Fencing along upgraded electrical system, Negotiations to acquire Abernethy and Coffee Columbia Slough Trail at renovated two campground 6-mile corridor for future creeks the International Raceway restroom buildings with trail and trail construction and showers, new picnic YY * ' C% Ic improvements at Kelley shelters, trail upgrades, T 76. Rivergrove, Tualatin River Point Park habitat restoration, signs 6S. Happy Valley, Scott View Access Repair and improve ! Nature Park 1.5-mile trail boat ramp to Tualatin River r system on Southeast slope of 46. Portland, Whitaker Ponds 55. Wood Village, Wood Village Mt. Scott 8.7 acres of wetland area City Park 12-acre natural 77. West Linn, Robinwood acquired along the Columbia area added to the city park Community Park 12 Slough in Northeast and improvements including 66. Happy Valley, Happy Valley wooded acres acquired for Portland trailhead, trails, creek Wetland Park Future nature future community park * M~ crossings and Arata Creek trail through natural area * ffllt 3: X-R restoration adjacent to city park 47. Portland, M. James Gleason 78. Wilsonville, Memorial Park Boat Ramp Future renova- * ffl~ 2: Provide road-separated trail tion of marine park at S6. Barton, Barton Park 67. Lake Oswego, South Shore access to the park Northeast 43rd and Marine campground Constructed Natural Area 7 wooded T Drive including boat ramp, new overnight camping acres acquired along the boarding dock, restrooms and day-use area including south shore of the lake with 79. Wilsonville, Memorial Park and picnic facilities covered shelter, picnic viewpoint from South Shore Improve trails along the ] J 1~ tables, restrooms, landscap- Boulevard Willamette River ~ i:~ 3: X 48. Portland vicinity, Howell ing * ~p Territorial Park Plans and * r z Tf ' 68. Milwaukie, Minthorn 80. Wilsonville, school design for public parking, 57. Boring, Springwater Trail Wetland Acquired natural greenspaces Restore habitat restroom, pathways, picnic Corridor 6.9-acre acquisi- area adjacent to Wetlands on property at two shelters and ADA access to tion to complete a .25-mile Conservancy property for elementary, one middle and the historic home at this 93- segment of the trail futuM~ 2: naatuu 711re park one high schools acre park on Sauvie Island T Y Ate' 69. Milwaukie, Springwater 81. Wilsonville, Boeekman 58. Carver, Clackamas River Trail Corridor Connect Creek Crossing Trail New 49. Portland vicinity, Sauvie Greenway 2.5 acres of s Island Boat Ramp Renovate natural area acquired at the neArdenw2ld ar Southeast neighborhood 28th Avenue wtrailith neighbconnectiorhngooscdhs schools and marine park including new confluence of Clear Creek near ramp and boarding dock, adjacent to the Carver Boat to the5pringwaterTtail town center r restrooms, picnic tables and Ramp 0% X * R' (ft lc T parking 1r~ ~ ~ ICR 70. Milwaukie, Furnberg Park 82. Wilsonville, Me»yc7lle Clackamas vicinity, Mt. Enhance 1.3-acre wetland in Neighborhood Park Restore S9. Cl park 50. Portland vicinity, Talbert 183 acres acquired with native vegetation 5-acre wetland in park Burlington Bottoms Trail in partnership with Metro plan~ti¢ngs improvements and for future nature park 1C'IC 8: footbridge . 71. Milwaukie, Roswell Wetland Enhance habitat These projects provide 60. Gladstone, Meldrum Bar values with native vegeta- Si. Troutdale, Beaver Creek park Two picnic shelters, tion plantings habitat * for fish and Canyon 15.6 acres acquired picnic tables, BBQ and 4 in partnership with Metro landscaping * ffl~m wildlife. MlItThey also along the east side of the 72. Milwaukie, Willow Place greenway near Southeast Wetland Enhance habitat provide open spaces, Stark Street and Troutdale 61. Gladstone, Abernethy Lane values with native vegeta- l Road Trail Trail from Portland tion plantings parks and trails for l Avenue to Glen Echo Avenue * R~z hiking,X biking,cfb S2. Troutdale, Beaver Creek 73. Milwaukie, Kellogg Lake Canyon New soft-surface Acquire small property picnicking, ~i°F fishing,I~ trails, boardwalks, creek 62, Gladstone, Cross Memorial between McLoughlin bridge and improvements of Park Native plant landscape Boulevard and Kellogg Lake boating and wildlife existing trails in greenway improvements along the for future trail access watehingS Clackamas River 1 .A01 44. Portland, Springwater Trail S3. Troutdale, Beaver Creek 63. Gladstone Acquired 0.6- 74. Oregon City, Clackamette Corridor Acquired 2.6 acres Canyon Removed invasive acre greenspace on Valley Park Boat ramp improve- at Southeast 86th Avenue species and restored habitat View Road for future ments, parking, new and 1.5 acres at Southeast with native vegetation neighborhood park restroom and park 174th Avenue for future perimeter trail trailhead access Cabs X +k~ S4. Troutdale vicinity, Oxbow 64. Gladstone/Milwaukie Cif X Regional Park New water vicinity, Portland Traction 7S. Oregon City Acquired 45. Portland, North Portland and distribution system, company right-of-way streamside properties along trails Fencing along upgraded electrical system, Negotiations to acquire Abernethy and Coffee Columbia Slough Trail at renovated two campground 6-mile corridor for future creeks the International Raceway restroom buildings with trail * ml~ and trail construction and showers, new picnic improvements at Kelley shelters, trail upgrades, 76. Rivergrove, Tualatin River 1 Point Park habitat restoration, signs 6S. Happy Valley, Scott View Access Repair and improve Y Nature Park 1.5-mile trail boat ramp to Tualatin River 7l system on Southeast slope of 46. Portland, Whitaker Ponds SS. Wood Village, Wood Village Mt. Scott 8.7 acres of wetland area City Park 12-acre natural 77. West Linn, Robinwood acquired along the Columbia area added to the city park Community Park 12 Slough in Northeast and improvements including 66. Happy Valley, Happy Valley wooded acres acquired for Portland trailhead, trails, creek Wetland Park Future nature future community park * ffl~z crossings and Arata Creek trail through natural area * 4X nq~- restoration adjacent to city park 47. Portland, Al. James Gleason Y YY 78. Wilsonville, Memorial Park Boat Ramp Future renova- * l~ it n X X Provide road-separated trail tion of marine park at S6. Barton, Barton Park 67. Lake Oswego, South Shore access to the park Northeast 43rd and Marine campground Constructed Natural Area 7 wooded C% Drive including boat ramp, new overnight camping acres acquired along the boarding dock, restrooms and day-use area including south shore of the lake with 79. Wilsonville, Memorial Park and picnic facilities covered shelter, picnic viewpoint from South Shore Improve trails along the -Ti- -_6 tables, restrooms, landscap- Boulevard Wi+Yllllamette River is n 48. Portland vicinity, Howell ing * 4 : yy Territorial Park Plans and * mltx n ff 68. Milwaukie, Minthorn 80. Wilsonville, school design for public parking, S7. Boring, Springwater Trail Wetland Acquired natural greenspaces Restore habitat restroom, pathways, picnic Corridor 6.9-acre acquisi- area adjacent to Wetlands on property at two shelters and ADA access to tion to complete a .25-mile Conservancy property for elementary, one middle and the historic home at this 93- segment of the trail future nature park one high schools acre park on Sauvie Island C% T ep * ft, 8: X-R * ffl~v: X Xff 58. Career Clackamas River 69. Milwaukie, Springwater 81. Wilsonville, Boeckman , 49. Portland vicinity, Sauvie Greenway 2.5 acres of Trail Corridor Connect Creek Crossing Trail New Island Boat Ramp Renovate natural area acquired at the Ardenwald neighborhood trail connecting schools marine park including new confluence of Clear Creek near Southeast 28th Avenue with neighborhoods and r ramp and boarding dock, adjacent to the Carver Boat to the Springwater Trail town center restrooms, picnic tables and Ramp T X parking * T : 70. Milwaukie, Furnberg Park 82. Wilsonville, Merryville S9. Clackamas vicinity, Mt. Enhance 1.3-acre wetland in Neighborhood Park Restore S0. Portland vicinity, Talbert 183 acres acquired park with native vegetation 5-acre wetland in park Burlington Bottoms Trail in partnership with Metro plantings improvements and for future nature park * ml~ ! footbridge ~~pp ~ ~ ~ Xff 71. Milwaukie, Roswell 60. Gladstone, Meldrum Bar Wetland Enhance habitat These projects provide 51. Troutdale, Beaver Creek Park Two picnic shelters, values with native vegeta- Canyon 15.6 acres acquired picnic tables, BBQ and tion plantings habitat * for fish and in partnership with Metro landscaping along the east side of the ~ wildlife. Ml~ They also geenway near Southeast 72. M ilwaukie, Willow Place, Stark Street and Troutdale 61. Gladstone, Abernethy Lane Wetland Enhance habitat provide open spaces, Road Trail Trail from Portland values with native vegeta- * Rlt 8 Avenue to Glen Echo tion plantings parks and trails for S2. Troutdale, Beaver Creek A+k~venue A ffllt z hikin9.X bikin9.Cfb Carryon New soft-surface et n 73. Milwaukie, Kellogg Lake trails, boardwalks, creek 62. Gladstone, Cross Memorial Acquire small property picnicking, FF fishing,h bridge and improvements of between McLoughlin Park Native plant landscape Boulevard and Kello Lake boating and wildlife existing trails in geenway improvements along the BB 71 Clackamas River for future trail access X watching. A0 Oxbow Regional Park Troutdale vicinity only a 30-minute drive Thanks to funds from the There is plenty to do at , from Portland and you can bond measure and Oregon Oxbow Regional Park. be camping under the stars State Parks, campers can Nature classes and tours, , in a beautiful forest setting, now look forward to a summer campfire pro- among wildlife and the better camping experience. grams, hiking in an ancient , sounds of the Sandy River. The campground has forest, mountain biking, Metro's Oxbow Regional undergone improvements, fishing, boating, swimming Park is a 1,200-acre including 22 new camp- and wildlife watching are natural area eight miles sites, two new restroom just a few of the activities. east of Gresham within the buildings with showers, Sandy River Gorge, part of four additional toilets in the National Wild and the campground, an up- Scenic River System. graded water system and more efficient road and Managed by Metro's trail access. Regional Parks and Greenspaces Department, Sixty-seven wooded camp- the park receives about sites now are available on a 220,000 visitors each year. first-come, first-served With no major facility basis. Each site has a improvements made since cooking grill, picnic table, the 1960s, park facilities lantern hanger and fire pit. were simply worn out. Wood Village City ` Park Wood Village Wood Village City Park always has been a popular place for baseball or for children to play in the a L "tot lots." The city E recently added a new 0 dimension to the park. Twelve acres of open space were added to the park's southern border and now offer a stroll through restored greenspace. a Arata Creek flows through the property and had been improve habitat for wild- have easy access to the overgrown with blackber- life. A soft-surface trail greenspace for nature ries. Invasive plants were now connects the main city study. removed and native park to a wooded area to vegetation planted to the south. Students of 1 Arata Creek School also i Barton Park Campground Barton Barton Park has long The area was landscaped been a popular place for with native grasses, shrubs people to enjoy the and trees and wetlands Clackamas River. Picnick- enhanced to provide cover ing, hiking, swimming, and habitat for resident fishing, rafting and wildlife. Waterfowl, red- camping are all favorite winged blackbirds, swal- activities. With support lows and frogs are fre- from Metro's open spaces, quently found around the parks and streams bond ponds in the area. measure and other funds, a former gravel pit was Barton Park also is adja- reclaimed and converted to cent to the Springwater be part of a new camp- Trail Corridor that begins ground area just minutes in Southeast Portland near from Portland. the Willamette River and runs nearly 20 miles east Reservations are already through Gresham to being taken for this 17- Boring. A feasibility study acre, 40-site overnight to extend the trail to campground that offers RV Barton Park, Estacada and accommodations, tent the Pacific Crest Trail in sites, water, electricity, Mt. Hood National Forest restrooms and a covered is planned for the future. shelter for group events. This project brings the total number of campsites in the park to 95. Abernethy Lane 'T'rail Gladstone WELCOME TO Abernethy Lane was once Funding from the bond a railroad right-of-way, measure was used to full of potholes and stand- improve the historic ing water during winter corridor, formerly part of E ; months. It also was identi- the Portland Traction Co., Cj ADSO(dE fied as an important trail and provide "curb appeal" link within the metropoli- to the neighborhood. The s"= tan regional trail system. right-of-way was expanded I from 30 to 70 feet to After agreements were include a fully accessible i reached with the Union asphalt pathway for j and Southern Pacific pedestrians and bikes. railroads and securing funds, Abernethy Lane In the future, the lane will Trail is now a popular be enhanced with addi- feature in the Gladstone tional landscaping and community. links to parks and greenspaces in the other parts of the community. Happy - Valley~~ S~' ~~r, fT Y L." t Wetland ' Park Happy Valley Students from Happy Valley Elementary School know their water bugs and other wetland wildlife, thanks to new access to ponds adjacent to the school. Using funds from the bond measure, habitat in the 26-acre nature park was improved and a new boardwalk path will be installed this summer over sensitive wetlands from the school to the pond. Mt. Talbert The boardwalk and trails will be known as Wetland Happy Valley vicinity Park Nature Trail and has become a valuable place people in the community for outdoor learning. are stepping up and getting involved in its manage- All 457 students in grades ment," says Suzanne Bader, one through six are community relations involved in activities in the coordinator for the district. park. Teacher Jim "People will be able to Schumacher trains his volunteer their time on older students to serve as r, habitat restoration projects. mentors to younger Schools can participate in students in plant and environmenta! studies in wildlife identification, as the future. Occasionally, we well as the use of environ- arrange guided hiking mental measuring equip- tours," adds Bader. ment. Students monitor ' water quality, make When funding is available L observations, track the and permits are obtained, ob work results and report their will begin to com- findings to City Hall. Among freeways, shop- North Clackamas Parks plete a trail system using ping centers and neighbor- and Recreation District existing old logging roads t "We're lucky to have these hoods rises a 183-acre, will improve access to this and historic deer trails. 1 wetlands next to the forested volcanic cone future nature park. A Parking, a footbridge and 1 school. Students quickly known as Mt. Talbert. This master plan was approved restroom also are planned. learn the value of natural remarkable natural area in 2000 that describes In the meantime, Mt. resources in our lives and was acquired with bond what will be a trail system Talbert will continue to be the importance of taking funds in partnership with and multiple access points home to a wide variety of care of our greenspaces," Metro and will remain from surrounding neigh- native plants and wildlife notes Schumacher. green and offer visitors an borhoods around the base. and serve as a pleasant invigorating hike through green visual backdrop in mixed forest to the 740- "Although Mt. Talbert is the north Clackamas foot summit. not formally open to the County. public at this time, many South Shore Natural Area Lake Oswego A pair of nesting bald eagles is very grateful that about 7 acres of Lake Oswego shoreline is now in public trust to be protected and managed as natural open space. Featuring a thick stand of mixed forest, the land lies between South Shore Boulevard and the lake. The property is mostly inaccessible to peopleg because of its relatively steep slope. However, a ; small area on top offers a place to sit and a glimpse of the lake below. The South . Shore Natural Area is a; special place for wildlife,, from chickadees to eagles. Minthorn Herons, ducks, beaver, songbirds and other W eland wildlife already use the x' r property. Increasing the r? Milwaukie wetland area and planting is native vegetation will Vince considered "use- improve habitat. After the , . less" except as a dumping plantings are complete, place for fill dirt, the plans include access trails Minthorn property in and observation points for j Milwaukie is being people to enjoy and learn • restored as a viable wet- about wetlands. - land area with the help of the city and volunteers "This place will become a from the Hector Campbell great tool to point out the Neighborhood Association benefits of wetlands to and The Wetlands Conser- students and the whole vancy. The open space was community," says JoAnn a "natural" for acquisition Herrigel, Milwaukie because of its location program coordinator. "The adjacent to property volunteer opportunities already owned by The also will give people a way Wetlands Conservancy. to stay in touch with nature." Clackamette ~ ;x ~.a Sr iY 1 r ~ r > f(~ r t."T'2 s4 h r r { ,t t 4:-r T,.r~.,.;4rr1~`*).~~~i }i*4ti.~ Park sue. " Oregon City Tall cottonwoods and open meadows bordered by the Clackamas and Willamette rivers charac- terize Clackamette Park in Oregon City. The 22-acre park offers twice the river access to a variety of outdoor activities, its most popular feature being boat- ramp access to the rivers. However, visitors can also enjoy a perimeter hiking/ biking trail, picnic areas, playground, overnight RV area and dramatic river views. Bond measure funds were Tualatin River Access used to help support new restroorn facilities, improve Rivergrove the boat ramp, build the perimeter trail and provide more picnic areas. The park is heavily used for boating and fishing activities, but its unusual setting adjacent to two major rivers gives visitors a special place to enjoy the nature of the region. The Rivergrove commu- work and now the commu- Imagine paddling down the nity of about 300 people nity again has convenient slow-moving river in your located along the Tualatin access to the Tualatin kayak or canoe surrounded River invested its portion of River. by a green ribbon of the bond measure to repair cottonwood and ash trees the public boat ramp. Public access to the river and the occasional inter- Located across from the currently is limited along ruption of a belted king- city park, the ramp suffered its 30-mile lower stretch, fisher's rattle-like call or damage from recent floods. but projects such as the one the indignant squawk of a to repair the Rivergrove great blue heron. j A host of volunteers, along boat ramp give people an r with a construction opportunity for a remark- contractor; completed the able outdoor experience. Robinwood Community Park West Linn y 1°r, Creative thinking and to protect the greenspace. cooperation have gone a The neighborhood long way to protect a 12- approved a special prop- acre wooded open space in erty tax - and combined a West Linn neighborhood. with the bond measure With two streams, meadow funds - the deal was and riparian forest, the made," he said. area will now become Robinwood Community The park is now identified ~'rr Park thanks to a high level as a priority in the city's of cooperation between the master plan. City staff former landowner, the and volunteers from the neighborhood, Metro and neighborhood and beyond the city of West Linn, are already making improvements to the park. "It was a friendly acquisi- Marines helped construct a tion," according to Ken small parking area, and Worcester, West Linn parks volunteers removed exotic director. "The property invasive plants to improve was being prepared for a conditions for wildlife. A town home development. 110-foot suspension bridge Clearing the land had not will allow access into the taken place and most of property and protect the the people in the neighbor- waterways. hood wanted to seek a way Boeckman In building the trail, careful q attention was given to Creek protecting the native plants and wildlife. Volunteers .Crossing carefully removed ferns and other native plants before TraZ ] the trail was constructed. 6 After the trail was built, invasive plants were Wilsonville removed; the saved plants were returned as part of a Boeckman Creek Crossing student naturescaping Trail serves many Pur- project. A 60-foot freespan ~a--•:~,;r~- poses. It provides a safe, bridge crosses Boeckman off-road shortcut to Creek well above the 100- Boeckman Creek Elemen- year floodplain. tary School and Wilson- ville High School for The restoration work students from the Court- improved habitat for deer, side neighborhood. In the raccoons, birds, snakes and other direction, it connects salamanders that share the the neighborhood to area with the residents of Wilsonville's commercial Wilsonville. The trail gives district. Perhaps most of people a way to walk all, it provides people in around their city through a the community a touch of corridor of green. nature close to home. ' People places • Open spaces In the Portland metropolitan region, people have told us that protecting and managing a healthy environment is crucial to keeping our communities livable. Your local park agencies are working closely with Metro to assure there are places for people to play and relax and open spaces for fish, wildlife and scenic value. The projects in this publication reflect only a small piece of the effort. The following cities, counties and organizations are responsible for providing the best possible parks, greenspaces, trails and recreational programs and services: Beaverton Milwaukie Wood Village Cornelius Oregon City Clackamas County Durham Portland Metro Fairview Rivergrove North Clackamas Parks Forest Grove Sherwood and Recreation District Gladstone Tigard Oregon Parks and Gresham Troutdale Recreation Department Happy Valley Tualatin Tualatin Hills Park and Hillsboro West Linn Recreation District Lake Oswego Wilsonville Washington County Metro GreenScene is produced by Metro's Regional Parks and Greenspaces Department; Charles Ciecko, director. For information about the services and opportunities provided by Metro's Regional Parks and Greenspaces Department, call (503) 797-1850 or visit www.metro-region.org Metro - planning that protects the nature of our region It's better to plan for growth than ignore it. Planning is Metro's top job. Metro provides a regional forum where cities, counties and citizens can resolve issues related to growth - things such as protecting streams and open spaces, transportation and land-use choices and increasing the region's recycling efforts. Open spaces, salmon runs and forests don't stop at city limits or county lines. Planning ahead for a healthy environment and stable economy supports livable communities now and protects the nature of our region for the future. Metro serves 1.3 million people who live in Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington counties and the 24 L cities in the Portland metropolitan area. Metro provides transportation and land-use planning services and k oversees regional garbage disposal and recycling and waste reduction programs. Metro manages regional parks and greenspaces and the Oregon Zoo. It also oversees operation of the Oregon Convention Center, the Portland Center for the Performing Arts and the Portland Metropolitan J Exposition (Expo) Center, all managed by the Metropolitan Exposition-Recreation Commission. For more information about Metro or to schedule a speaker for a community group, call (503) 797-1510 1 (public affairs) or (S03) 797-1540 (council). 1 Metro's web site: www metro-region.org Metro is governed by an executive officer, elected regionwide, and a seven-member council elected by districts. An auditor, also elected regionwide, reviews Metro's operations. Executive Officer - Mike Burton; Auditor - Alexis Dow, CPA; Council: Presiding Officer - David Bragdon, District 7; Deputy Presiding Officer - Susan McLain, District 4; Rod Park, District 1; Bill Atherton, District 2; Carl Hosticka, District 3; Rex Burkholder, District 5; Rod Monroe, District 6. Printed on recycled-content paper. 2001-10769-RPG 01103 tsm a f.,) eP Nature is always hinting at us. It hints over and over again, and suddenly we take the hint. - Robert Frost R Y fti~ Presorted Standard U.S. Postage Paid Portland, OR METRO Permit No. 1246 600 NE Grand Ave. Portland, OR 97232 www.metro-region.org ,s Agenda Item No. Meeting of (a (D j~~ COUNCIL MINUTES TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 27, 2003 Mayor Griffith called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Council Present: Mayor Griffith; Councilors Dirksen, Moore, Sherwood, and Wilson STUDY SESSION ➢ UPDATE ON THE RANDALL GRANT PROGRAM Assistant to the City Manager Newton presented the staff report. The City entered into a contract with Randall Funding and Development on June 12, 2001 for grant writing services. A funding strategy report was developed that emphasized pursuing grants for the new library, transportation, police, the downtown, parks and wetlands, and youth programs. After the Incidents of September 11, 2001, the focus of disbursement of federal grant funds shifted to Homeland Security, primarily for fire departments and first responders. No grants were submitted for various reasons. Randall agreed to provide services for the current fiscal year at no charge. In the current fiscal year, Randall secured a grant of $10,668 for bullet proof vests. Randall just submitted a grant application for HAZMAT response equipment for the police department in the amount of $43,244. Another grant application for $105,698 has been submitted for forensic video assessment equipment and AED's for each police vehicle. Randall has agreed to provide weekly grant alerts and write up to four grant proposals for the next fiscal year at no charge to the City. A DISCUSSION OF PARKS FEES AND CHARGES Park Manager Dan Plaza presented the staff report. It has been ten years since the application fees and rental rates for park reservations (picnic shelters and fields) have been raised. Mr. Plaza reviewed the rate structure and the goal to recover approximately 70% of the administrative and operational costs of the picnic shelter and fields reservation program while maintaining a 50% reduced hourly rate for resident users. Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 27, 2003 Page 1 Council discussed several options on rate structure. The general consensus was that the administrative fees were high. It was suggested that administrative fees should be reduced and that hourly fees should be reviewed for a 50-70% cost recovery. The Council members supported non-residents paying a higher fee than residents. Staff will return with a new proposal for fee rates on June 17, 2003, which is a Council workshop meeting. y Administrative Items o School Groundbreaking Invitations ■ Metzger School, June 2, 1 p.m. • C.F. Tigard School, June 4, 10:35 a.m. Formal invitations are expected this week. o "Cops and Brats" - Haggens Grocery Store is focusing on community involvement in Tigard. On May 30, 31, June 13, 14, 27, 28, and July 18 and 19, Haggens will sell a bratwurst and soft drink for $2. A donation of $1.25 for each purchase will be made to police department youth programs. o School District Ballot Issue - A meeting is scheduled the morning of May 28 to discuss a possible school district ballot measure that would be submitted to the voters on the September 2003 ballot to support pools and School Resource Officers. Council will receive an update in the May 30 Council newsletter. o June 15 dedication of the Nicoll Brothers Ball Fields was postponed indefinitely. Dave Nicoll will select a new date. o Council received information on legislative issues that City staff is tracking as well as Information on the referendum process in their May 23 mail packet. o A letter from Robert A. Pierce st Associates and an e-mail communication from Jim Thielke regarding the street maintenance fee were distributed to the Council. • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 7:12 p.m. to discuss labor negotiations under ORS 192.660 (1 d). 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Mayor Griffith called the City Council & Local Contract Review Board meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call: Mayor Griffith, Councilors Dirksen, Moore, Sherwood and Wilson 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports: None 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items: None Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 27, 2003 Page 2 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA Two people, Cieon Cox 111 and Paul E, Owen, signed in to speak during the Visitor's Agenda about the street maintenance fee. Upon advice of Legal Counsel Ramis, Mayor advised that no additional comments from the public could be heard by Council since the public hearing was conducted and closed on April 22, 2003. The purpose of the agenda Item before the Council at this meeting is for the Council to discuss this Issue. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Sherwood, to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: 3.1 Approve Council Minutes for April 22, 2003 3.2 Local Contract Review Board a. Award the contract for the construction of Street and Storm Drainage Improvements on Walnut Terrace to DstD Concrete and Utilities The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Sherwood - Yes Councilor Wilson - Yes 4. DISCUSSION WITH STATE SENATOR GINNY BURDICK AND STATE REPRESENTATIVE MAX WILLIAMS State Representative Williams visited with Council about the status of activities at the legislature. An additional $60 million shortfall is projected for this biennium budget period; however, state revenue sharing will not be lost to local governments this session. Legislators are grappling with short-term budget balances along with long- term stability and structure of the tax system. Mayor Griffith reiterated Tigard's concern about state preemption on local government's abilities to set fees. Representative Williams said that by-in-large, he did not support preemption proposals. There was discussion on school-related funding to raise taxes outside the $ S cap on schools. The legislature may need to act to give schools the ability to ask voters to approve activities (not strictly related to education) such as swim center operations and recreation programs. Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 27, 2003 Page 3 In response to a question from Councilor Sherwood, Representative Williams said he hopes that the Housing Trust Fund will not be "raided." In response to a question from Councilor Wilson, Representative Williams said SAIF is doing a good job in keeping worker's compensation premiums in check. There are differing opinions on whether SAIF should continue as a quasi-public corporation. An initiative will be before voters on whether this insurance should be provided by the private sector. Representative Williams responded to the concerns noted by Mayor Griffith on SB 444, 445 and 446. These bills are now in the House Rules Committee and "do not appear to be moving fast." Because of the technical nature of these bills, Representative Williams said he thought legislators were waiting to educate themselves on the effects of these legislative proposals until it became more likely these bills would make it out of committee. Representative Williams said he realized that management is opposed to the bills, while the unions are supportive. Representative Williams said that the effort to preempt additional hotel/motel taxes locally was still in the Revenue Committee; talks have stalled. Senator Burdick arrived later in the meeting. She also spoke about the budget issues and the difficulty of determining what to fund and how to pay for important programs. She stated she is strongly opposed to preempting local government's ability to raise fees or establish new fees for service. Senator Burdick noted there are discussions being held outside the government about a grass roots effort to revise the tax structure. 5. CONTINUE DISCUSSION OF THE STREET MAINTENANCE FEE w i i City Engineer Duenas reviewed the staff report and the status of this agenda item. On April 22, 2003, a public hearing was held to consider the formation of a street i maintenance fee. Council reviewed responses to questions they posed to staff at its May 13, 2003, meeting. i City Engineer Duenas presented five options for Council to consider to provide direction to staff. Council discussion highlights follow: Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 27, 2003 Page 4 - Councilor Moore noted this proposal has been studied for two years. The original recommendation to implement a street maintenance fee was forwarded to Council by a task force comprised of a group of citizens who were asked to study funding options and forward recommendations to the Council. Councilor Moore said he is concerned about the economic climate for business and might consider a compromise option. - Councilor Wilson said he was concerned about the equity of how the fee is split between residents and businesses. He said he might consider a 50/50 split to cover the cost of street maintenance only, since in the long-run a maintenance program would save money. - Councilor Sherwood expressed concerns about the economy and said this was bad timing for businesses to have to pay this fee. She said she was in favor of business representatives (from Oregon Grocers, Washington Square, and Tigard Chamber of Commerce) meeting with the task force members to attempt to find a compromise solution. - Councilor Dirksen said he agreed with Councilor Moore adding that he thought the calculation of the fee was done scientifically. He said he would be willing for the task force and businesses to work toward a compromise on how the fee should be split; however, he would like to have a time limit and suggested 60 days. - Mayor Griffith said the City would have to provide the funding for street maintenance since it's apparent that financial aid is not available from the state. He agreed that the economic climate for businesses is not good. He also noted that a street maintenance fee may not be the best way to fund sidewalk and right- of-way maintenance. - Councilor Moore expressed concern about sending this matter back to the task force and he supported making the decision now. He said he would like to have sidewalks included for safety reasons and the right-of-way maintenance is important to help with the appearance. He said the appearance of much of the right-of-way along Durham Road is an embarrassment to the City. Councilor Moore supported the method of fee calculations proposed by the task force since much of the business-related traffic in Tigard is generated by non-residents traveling to destination shopping locations. - Discussion continued with Council members agreeing with Councilor Moore's remarks, but suggested funding just the street maintenance portion first and then consider funding right-of-way maintenance and sidewalks at a later time. - After discussion, motion made by Councilor Dirksen, seconded by Councilor Wilson, to support options 2 and 5 as outlined in the staff report as follows: The Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force is to review this matter with representatives of the business community and make a recommendation to the Council within the next 60 days; the scope of the fee will be limited to cover street maintenance and street light and traffic signal maintenance (not sidewalks or right-of-way). Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 27, 2003 Page 5 The motion was approved by a majority vote of Council: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - No Councilor Sherwood - Yes Councilor Wilson - Yes - City Attorney advised the Council would need to decide whether to reopen the public hearing. 6. UPDATE ON GREENSPACES PROGRAM BY METRO PRESIDENT DAVID BRAGDON Metro Council President David Bragdon updated Council on the Greenspace program approved by voters in 1995. Tigard was allocated $757,000 which has helped fund the purchase of 4.25 acres on Bull Mountain and property for the Fanno Creek Greenway trail. President Bragdon distributed information to the Council on the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail and the August 2001 Metro GreenScene, which outlined what has been accomplished with the $135.6 million package to buy land to protect forest, wetland, river and stream habitats. 7. CONSIDER THE FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN Park Manager Dan Plaza presented the staff report. He introduced Jonathan Beaver of Murase and Associates who shared with Council key elements of the Fanno Creek Master Plan. Several public input meetings were held and this input was incorporated into the master plan as to how the site should be developed and landscaped. The cost for the master plan services was $26,397 funded by Parks Systems Development Charges. The City has applied for a grant to construct the Fanno Creek Trail. Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Wilson, to approve the Fanno Creek Park Extension Master Plan. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Sherwood - Yes Councilor Wilson - Yes Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 27, 2003 Page 6 I - I - mi 8. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - SW MAPLELEAF AND SW OAK WAY PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY VACATION (VAC2002-00002) The Tigard City Council will consider the proposed vacation involving a 26,258 square foot portion of SW Mapleleaf Street that lies to the south of SW Locust Street between SW Lincoln Street and SW 90' Avenue; and a 9,716 square foot portion of right-of-way formerly known as SW Oak Way that lies south of SW Mapleleaf Street between SW Lincoln Street and SW 901 Avenue. The reason for the vacation request is to allow the Tigard-Tualatin School District to replace the existing Metzger Elementary School with a new school at the same location through a Conditional Use approval. There are no existing utilities in or along either right-of-ways to be vacated. The request was filed with the City on December 31, 2002 and initiated by the City Council at the request of the applicant on April 8, 2003. Any interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacation of said Mapleleaf Street/Oak Way Public Right-of-Way Street Vacation. Any written objections or remonstrances shall be filed with the City Recorder by 7:30 PM on May 27, 2003. a. Mayor Griffith opened the public hearing. b. Declarations or Challenges: There were no declarations or challenges. C. Staff Report: Assistant Planner Matt Scheidegger presented the staff report. d. Public Testimony Proponents Mindy Shelton, 10425 SW 901 Avenue, Tigard, OR, testified in favor of the street vacation proposal, advising that the Oak Way portion of the vacation abuts her property. Ed Murphy, 9875 SW Murdock Street, testified as a representative of the Tigard-Tualatin School District (applicant) in support of the vacation. Mr. Murphy distributed drawings illustrating the site layout for the proposed new Metzger Elementary School. e. Staff recommended approval of the vacation and that the Council adopt the proposed ordinance. f. Mayor Griffith closed the public hearing g. Council Consideration: Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Dirksen to adopt Ordinance No. 03-03. ORDINANCE NO. 03-03 - AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE VACATION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 26,258 SQUARE FOOT Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 27, 2003 Page 7 PORTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BETTER KNOWN AS SW MAPLELEAF STREET AND AN APPROXIMATE 9,716 SQUARE FOOT STRIP OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FORMERLY KNOWN AS SW OAK WAY, WHICH LIES SOUTH OF SW MAPLELEAF STREET (VAC2002-00002). The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Sherwood - Yes Councilor Wilson - Yes 9. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS: None 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS: None 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Not held 12. ADJOURNMENT: 9:32 p.m. n e Wheatley, City eco Attest: yyo r D t-~ 1AD ADM\CATI MCCM\030527.DOC L C i a i i Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 27, 2003 Page 8 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503)684-0360 , MAY 2 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97M`_"!,' TT 10231 Leg-, N,..: _ - - - City of Tigard CITY OF TIGARD 3125 SW Hall Blvd. OREGON igard,Oregon 97223 A, - accounts Payable NOTICE OF STREET VACATION & PUBLIC HEARING VACATION (VAC) 2002-00002 > MAPLELEAF STREET/OAK WAY PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY STREET VACATION < AFFIDAVIT OF Pl The Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on Tuesday May STATE OF OREGON, 27, 2003 at 7:30 PM at the Tigard City Hall, Town Hall Room, 13125 j SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 to consider the proposed COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, j SS' vacation involving a 26,258 square foot portion of SW Mapleleaf Street that lies to the south of SW Locust Street between SW Lincoln 1, TCa+h~r ~nrlar Street and SW 90th Avenue; and a 9,716 square foot portion of right- being first duly sworn, depose and say that of-wa formers known as SW Oak Way that lies south of SW Director, or his principal clerk, of the-Tiga Mapleleaf Street between SW Lincoln Street and SW 901 Avenue. a newspaper of general circulation as defi The reason for the vacation request is to allow the Tigard-Tualatin and 193.020; published at_____Tj_ga rd School District to replace the existing Metzger Elementary School aforesaid cou 02-nt sttaate; Tt~,at the P bl with a new school at the same location through a Conditional Use VAC200t~~~dd 2,Mapleleaf '~tr approval. There are no existing utilities in or along either right-of- a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, ways to be vacated. entire issue of said newspaper for TWO The request was filed with the City on December 31, 2002 and initiated by the City Council at the request of the applicant on April consecutive in the following issues: 8, 2003. Any interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacation of said Mapleleaf Street/Oak Way May 8 ,15 , 2 0 0 3 Public Right-of-Way Street Vacation. Any written objections or remonstrances shall be filed with the City Recorder by 7:30 PM on May 27, 2003. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger) at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223, by calling 503-639-4171, or by email to watts&l.figard.or us. TT 10231 - Publish May 8, 15, 2003. Subscribed and sworn to efore me thist 5 tl- _ , ary Public for Oregon ` A BURGES3 My Commission Expires: P'r PUBLIC-OREGON AFFIDAVIT l P a. ai ad -!Aers `nsjuwainS uutpLN Xq Pual pug 01"WH UOPACH `aizuaxoBw sUgo •unj g poloos pug Ohl jOgug BU'4'q saauWN aU qq oAu pgq sggoH 03pf 'sSuluu, UMO i13IP3o s;n{ Suans mo3 Pagm!d japfgN oug Slq atuos qm ilogq Palusci soAsb 'urea; s01883 Pa;uale; atll Suw!q Suo.As auros punlaq g 1OAO UIM 0I-£I g aioas of;iogap SUM, lsrg all; ul peal tflu-' o3 g w04 i ovq Suiwoa %rpxn;gS g o; ;no padwnf slauusyV ag1, uo aureS 142184s 4;xis nag; •Suutiq;eaa u0m s1asub a 30 101 u 4;in+ aureS llugasvq asolo g L OL Sa~6a2idJI L g u[ SJOUW N otp Polgjap S0.4sd 13 'et S184ay onSen ;suoO ongeaZ alul,j UIO upsigns aqZ - MI.Ld'jVfl.i. •uaaJl.4i m4do7s!nf0 Pill? 6 saulaew c VL SOIISd `uOPlag OIX)l ziad stmH `miior M113 `xlll jamodS ucag asu0jap SaOAS ;oS SlaulagW ag L 1[aM pownd ssaoyy pegs PUL, siueua3a;uow tpoq a urladS Au luoi pug ougigop -131/41 x i `uosaaPUV uap,SgH pug a1Su s Bs PuE Ig ^AalPut/ 3 KogZ jallax assaf 0ia;aA I In L P 4 m3414eW wo.4 dlaq 0nis1133ap INH PB119 `Moos Pou alp lo3 A lead ;oS sO.Asy aqZ •,{gunW pug •salSuls PaPPe gaga xjuoW COVIIIMX11 a0" `a~img `spn~{o.RI w0.g auma gogZ pug AildmW win-1 `-lD:jm! A\ og u Sulgo;id sousd ju 00f `UingoO ana;S •salSuls P.O. BOX : 'slaununS o3p f pug nog 3o jlud a puq a&ozD lauuoD C 0 2 31 BEA `ns;euia,CnS `uosu o '~tepuoW aureS llegasuq sioNIN g f U]0~3 DUI an3ua•-j alill"1 pw2i•L u ui spo-a zy1 _Trm.r1 Snnnc nvr, cramrIMT ~Trr _ Legal Notice Advertising City of Tigard 0 ❑ Tearsheet Notice C 3125 SW Hall Blvd. • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit igard,Oregon 97223 Accounts Payable AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, Ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ? 1. Kai-by Snuaer being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the'ri rtarr1-Tna1_ati n ''rimes a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid count sttaate; tthha the P blic Hearing/ VAC2002-O66gs-stl taple eaf treet a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for TWO successive and consecutive in the following issues: May 8,15,2003 Subscribed and sworn to efore me thisl 5th day of May, 2 0 0 3 TI-fAL ica •4 URIGES3 Vary Public for Oregon ;~uruc-ar=coy My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of Posting CITY OF TIGARD In the Matter of the Proposed Ordinance(s) OREGON STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, (lt7 YI vt lTe , being first duly sworn (or affirmed), by oath (or affirmation), depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) 03 -0 3 , which were adopted at the City Council meeting of _ 5- - 7 ' 6 3 , with a copy(s) of said Ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the a day of 114 eL , 20-L 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. Tigard Public Library, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 3. Tigard Water Building, 8777 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon -:Y --Z~ Signature of Person who Performed Posting Subscribed and sworn (or-a€fined} before me this Z~ day of OFFICIAL SEAL p J BENGTSON NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Signat of Not blic for Oregon COMMISSION NO. 368086 MY COMMISSION EXPIRESAPR. 27, 2007 \\TIG333\USR\DEPTSVADM\GREER\FORMSVAFFIDAVITSVIFFIDAVIT OF POSTING - ORDINANCE.DOC CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 03- 03 AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE VACATION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 26,258 SQUARE FOOT PORTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BETTER KNOWN AS SW MAPLELEAF STREET AND AN APPROXIMATE 9,716 SQUARE FOOT STRIP OF RIGHT- OF-WAY FORMERLY KNOWN AS SW OAK WAY, WHICH LIES SOUTH OF SW MAPLELEAF STREET (VAC2002-00002). WHEREAS, the approximate 26,258 square foot portion of the public right-of-way had previously been dedicated to the public; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested that the City of Tigard vacate an approximate 26,258 square foot portion of public right-of-way as described in Attachment 2, Exhibit "A" and shown in Attachment 2, Exhibit "B" better known as SW Mapleleaf Street; and WHEREAS, the approximately 9,716 square foot portion of land had previsouly been dedicated to the public; and WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested that the City of Tigard vacate an approximate 9,716 square foot portion of public right-of-way, as described in Attachment 2, Exhibit "C" and shown in Attachment 2, Exhibit "D". WHEREAS, the said portion of public right-of-way may no longer be necessary; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds it appropriate to vacate the requested public right-of-way vacation. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council hereby initiates a request for the vacation of an approximately 26,258 square foot portion of public right-of-way commonly known as SW Mapleleaf Street, as more particularly described and shown in Attachment 2, Exhibits "A" and "B" and a 9,716 square foot portion of public right-of-way particularly described and shown in Attachment 2, Exhibit "C" and "D" and by reference, made a part hereof. i SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, j approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. ORDINANCE No. 0JL 03 Pagel of 2 i-%curpln\imthewlVACVAC2002-00002.ord f PASSED: By U J)QMY1c)w5 vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this a-)day of , 2003. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorde APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of , 2003. J' 'ffi a Approved as to form: Attorney S , 7- v Date i i i i i i ORDINANCE No. 03- 05 Page 2 of 2 i:\curpln\mathew\VAC\VAC2002-00002.ord ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT A TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON RIGHT OF WAY VACATION JANUARY 7, 2003 SHEET 1 OF 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PORTIONS OF THOSE RIGHT OF WAYS DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OF "TOWN OF METZGER", WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS, AS SW MAPLE LEAF STREET AND SW TAYLOR STREET LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN THE CITY OF METZGER, WASHINGTON COUNTY, STATE OF OREGON, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 5, SAID PLAT OF "TOWN OF METZGER", SAID POINT BEING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SW 90TH AVENUE (MONROE STREET) (25 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE THEREOF); THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SW MAPLE LEAF STREET (25 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE THEREOF) SOUTH 89°34'00" WEST, 449.54 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SW TAYLOR STREET (25 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE THEREOF); THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 00°29'26" WEST, 94.33 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN EXCEPTED 60 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND PER DEED DOCUMENT NO. 89-33482, RECORDED JULY 24, 1989, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, BEING A PORTION OF REALIGNED SW 92ND AND 93RD AVENUES AS DEFINED IN SURVEY NUMBER 23508, WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE ALONG THE CURVE OF A 380.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°29'23" (THE LONG CHORD BEARS SOUTH 22°22'56" WEST, 128.64 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 129.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID TAYLOR STREET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID SW LINCOLN STREET ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID TAYLOR STREET SOUTH 00029'26" EAST, 25.76 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERLY PROJECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID SW MAPLE LEAF STREET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY PROJECTION AND SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 89034'00" EAST, 499.54 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID SW 90TH AVENUE; I THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 00°29'26" WEST, 50.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. I I CONTAINING 26,258 SQUARE FEET OR 0.603 ACRES MORE OR LESS_ REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OREGON NOV. le,19e MICHAEL D. FR.AW 53854 RENEWAL /t/3l ~a3 ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT B RIGHT OF WAY VACATION OF PORTIONS OF SW MAPLE LEAF AND SW TAYLOR STREETS WITHIN THE PLAT OF 'TO MN OF METZGER' LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 35 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH. RANGE i WEST. YYILLAMETTE MEWOIAN CITY OF 71GAR0. WASHINGTON COUNTY. OREGON JANUARY 7. 2003 SW LOCUST STREET Ttma 1 i W '(A: 4 3 2 1 1 W a 12 y - jl U)5 --T-j EASTERLY MARGIN OF 60' WIDE z STRIP OF LAND PER DEED 6 tt DOCUMENT NO. 89-33482 v~i L Q T- 7 LA T N 8 9 10 ad 7 8 I 9 10 rn N v POINT OF t o f i I~ l _ BEGINNING (n. VJ °z BLOCK 6 N BLACK 5 .gyp. / ! /S89'34'00'iN 449.54 //1400 2926'W SOD79'26'E 3 . /Q Sl;Y MAPLE LEAF STREET - O 25.76' / n , t • v 00' 89'34 00-E 449.54 J in c BLOCK 17 z o I BLOCK 18 4/ I p oU 4, 3 2 f i c'01 xiv is/ 4 3 2 t 25 25' CURVE 9 A=19'29'23" R=380.00' L=129.26' CH=S22'22'56"W 128.64' z SCALE 1'-10W JOB NO. TSD3039 SHEET 2 OF 2 R b E S 1 G N I N C. 5415 SW IIESMAlE DR. PORiLA 0, OREGON 97221 'a (503) 419-2500 FAX: (503) 419-2600 PLANN:RS • ENGR4URS a LANDSCAPE ARM IECiS i SURVEY01zS EXHIBIT C ATTACHMENT 2 TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON RIGHT OF WAY VACATION DECEMBER 26, 2002 SHEET 1 OF 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PORTIONS OF THAT UNNAMED DEDICATED VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY IN THE PLAT OF "TOWN OF METZGER" LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN THE CITY OF METZGER, WASHINGTON COUNTY, STATE OF OREGON, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL OF THAT UNNAMED DEDICATED VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY LYING EASTERLY OF THAT EXCEPTED 60.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND PER DEED DOCUMENT NO. 89- 33482, RECORDED JULY 24TH, 1989, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF "TOWN OF METZGER", AND LYING WESTERLY OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SW 90TH AVENUE (MONROE.STREET) (25 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE THEREOF). REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OREGON11 NOV. 16,198 MICHAEL D. ~R. ANK RENEW.a.: 11,1a'103 EXHIBIT D . ATTACHMENT 2 RIGHT OF WAY VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN UN-NAMED DEDICATED ROADWAY WITHIN THE PLAT OF 'TOWN OF METZGER' LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 35 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH. RANGE 1 WEST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN CITY OF TIGARD. WASHINGTON COUNTY. OREGON DECEMBER 26. 2002 1 . 4 I 4 ( 3 ` 2 11 I I 4 13 4 2 ` 1 25'25' -LJ LA-~-L _l --1- EASTERLY MARGIN OF 60' WADE 5 12 p . 1 5 STRIP OF LAND PER DEED 12 44 DOCUMENT NO. 89-33482 _J O _ N 11 v) ti 6 11 I o 6 11 `I 6 o~ co 1 - Jas - I - - x a - z Z 7 BLOCK 16 10 3 I 7 BLOCK 17 10 ' 4 Q ' 7 BLOCK 18 10 8 9 8 9 8 9 ~ ~ - • 3 30' 7q• in SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF UNNAMED ROADWAY DEDICATION "TOWN OF METZGER" z SCALE: 1' 12W JOB NO. TSD3039 SHEET 2 OF 2 R E S 1 G N { N C 5415 SW WESTGATE DR., PORTLAND, OREGON 97221 $ (503) 419-2500 FAX: (503) 419-2600 PLANNERS ■ ENGINEERS ■ LANDSCAPE ARCMTECTS s SURVEYORS LLT* &Wnd~r Mayor's Agenda Revised 5/27/03 4i k& CITY CU,UNCIL r MEETING'- MAY 27, 2003 61'30 ,CITY CITY OF TiGARD ;s OREGON TlGARD CITY FIALL -13125 SW;HALL BLVD TIGARDOR ;_97223' PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503- 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 27, 2003 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 27, 2003 6:30 PM • STUDY SESSION > UPDATE ON THE RANDALL GRANT PROGRAM ■ City Administration Staff > DISCUSSION OF PARKS FEES AND CHARGES ■ Public Works Staff • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss labor negotiations under ORS 192.660(1 d). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council 8z Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Cali 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications 8z Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items CL 7:35 PM 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) n J 7:40 PM 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be r removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 1 3.1 Approve Council Minutes for April 22, 2003 COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 27, 2003 page 2 3.2 Local Contract Review Board a. Award the contract for the construction of Street and Storm Drainage Improvements on Walnut Terrace to DaXD Concrete and Utilities • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 7:45 PM 4. DISCUSSION WITH STATE SENATOR GINNY BURDICK AND STATE REPRESENTATIVE MAX WILLIAMS a. Comments by Senator Burdick and Representative Williams b. Council Discussion 8:45 PM 5. CONTINUE DISCUSSION OF THE STREET MAINTENANCE FEE a. Staff Report: Engineering Staff b. Council Discussion 9:15 PM 6. UPDATE ON GREENSPACES PROGRAM BY METRO PRESIDENT DAVID BRAGDON 9:25 PM 7. CONSIDER THE FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN a. Staff Report: Public Works Staff b. Council Discussion C. Council Consideration: Motion to approve the Fanno Creek Park Extension Master Plan 9:40 PM 8. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-) UDICIAL) - SW MAPLELEAF AND SW OAK WAY PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY VACATION (VAC2002-00002) The Tigard City Council will consider the proposed vacation involving a 26,258 square foot portion of SW Mapleleaf Street that lies to the south of SW Locust Street between SW Lincoln Street and SW 901 Avenue; and a 9,716 square foot portion of COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 27, 2003 page 3 right-of-way formerly known as SW Oak Way that lies south of SW Mapleleaf Street between SW Lincoln Street and SW 901 Avenue. The reason for the vacation request is to allow the Tigard-Tualatin School District to replace the existing Metzger Elementary School with a new school at the same location through a Conditional Use approval. There are no existing utilities in or along either right-of-ways to be vacated. The request was filed with the City on December 31, 2002 and initiated by the City Council at the request of the applicant on April 8, 2003. Any interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacation of said Mapleleaf Street/Oak Way Public Right-of-Way Street Vacation. Any written objections or remonstrance's shall be filed with the City Recorder by 7:30 PM on May 27, 2003. a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges C. Staff Report: Community Development Department d. Public Testimony Proponents Opponents Rebuttal e. Staff Recommendation f. Council Questions g. Close Public Hearing h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No.3 -03 Councilor. 1 move for adoption of the proposed ordinance. Councilor: I second the motion. Mayor: Will the City Recorder please read the number and title of the Ordinance. City Recorder: (Reads as requested.) e Mayor Is there any discussion? i ' Mayor (after j discussion): Will the City Recorder please conduct a roll-call vote of Council. I City Recorder: Conducts roll call vote. Mayor: Ordinance No. (is approved or fails) by a (unanimous or however votes were split) vote. COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 27, 2003 page 4 4:55 PM 9. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 10:00 PM 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS 10:10 PM 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 10:20 PM 12. ADJOURNMENT 1:WDWCAT"CCA1030527.D0C 1 a 1 1 COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 27, 2003 page 5 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION/ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS FOR REVIEW MAY 27, 2003 - 6:30 PM The Study Session Is held in the Red Rock Creek Conference Room. Enter at the back of Town Hall. The Council encourages interested citizens to attend all or part of the meeting. If the number of attendees exceeds the capacity of the Conference Room, the Council may move the Study Session to the Town Hall. • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Counci will meet in Executive Session to discuss labor negotiations as provided in ORS lf'l 92.660 (1) (d). If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. • STUDY SESSION > UPDATE ON THE RANDALL GRANT PROGRAM ■ City Administration Staff > DISCUSSION OF PARKS FEES AND CHARGES ■ Public Works Staff • ADMINSITRATIVE ITEMS o School Groundbreaking Invitations - Metzger School, June 2, 1 p.m. C.F. Tigard, June 4,10:35 a.m. o Cops and Brots o School District ballot issue update o June 15 Dedication of Nicoll Brothers Fields to be postponed indefinitely; Dave Nicoll to select a new date [ o Information Council received in Friday Mail packet - - Legislative tracking information Referendum process a o Letter from Robert A. Pierce et Associates regarding Street Maintenance Fee, received May 27, 2003 D Executive Session - The Public Meetings Law authorizes governing bodies to meet in executive session In certain limited situations (ORS 192.660). An "executive session" is defined as "any meeting or part of a meeting of a governing body, which is dosed to certain persons for deliberation on certain matters." Permissible Purposes for Executive Sessions: 192.660 (1) (a) - Employment of public officers, employees and agents, if the body has satisfied certain prerequisites. 192.660(l) (b) - Discipline of public officers and employees (unless affected person requests to have an open hearing). 192.6600) (c) - To consider matters pertaining to medical staff of a public hospital. 192.660(l) (d) - Labor negotiations. (News media can be excluded In this instance.) 192.660(l) (e) - Real property transaction negotiations. 192-6600) (f) - Exempt public records - to consider records that are "exempt by law from public inspection." These records are specifically identified in the Oregon Revised Statutes. 192-660(l) (g) - Trade negotiations - involving matters of trade or commerce in which the governing body is competing with other governing bodies. 192.660(l) (h) - Legal counsel - Executive session are appropriate for consultation with counsel concerning legal rights and duties regarding current litigation or litigation likely to be fled. 192.660(l) (1) - To review and evaluate, pursuant to standards, criteria, and policy directives adopted by the governing body, the employment-related performance of the chief executive officer, a public officer, employee or staff member unless the affected person requests an open hearing. The standards, criteria and policy directives to be used in evaluating chief executive officers shall be adopted by the governing body in meetings open to the public in which there has been an opportunity for public comment. 192.660 (1) (j) - Public investments - to carry on negotiations under ORS Chapter 293 with private persons or businesses regarding proposed acquisition, exchange or liquidation of public investments. 192.660 (1) (k)- Relates to health professional regulatory board. 1:1A MCATHY%COUNCIUCCLIST10300422.DOC EXHIBIT A Health Insurance Costs 2003/2004 Premiums Effective 8/1/03 BC/BS PPO BC/BS Trad Kaiser City Employee City Employee City Employee Current Monthly Contributions EE Only (74) $277.56 $23.09 $277.56 $29.14 $244.28 $0.00 2-Party (70) $569.39 $48.16 $569.39 $60.86 $479.86 $0.00 Family (97) $789.45 $65.05 $789.45 $82.05 $730.39 $0.00 2003/2004 Contractual Obligation (Monthly) EE Only (74) $293.24 $42.18 $293.24 $48.80 $289.19 $0.00 2-Party (70) $600.64 $85.11 $600.64 $99.07 $568.94 $0.00 Family (97) $834.78 $115.91 $834.78 $134.55 $834.78 $30.36 2003/2004 Monthly Costs - If City Contributes 100% Premiums EE Only (74) $335.42 $0.00 $335.42 $6.62 $289.19 $0.00 2-Party (70) $685.75 $0.00 $685.75 $13.96 $568.94 $0.00 Family (97) $950.69 $0.00 $950.69 $18.64 $865.14 $0.00 i i i i i EXHIBIT B Health Insurance Costs 2003/2004 Premiums Effective 8/1/03 Blue Cross Plans Kaiser Plan Current Monthly Costs to City EE Only (74) $14,433.12 $5,374.16 2-Party (70) $26,191.94 $11,516.64 Family (97) $51,314.25 $23,372.48 Total Monthly Costs: $91,939.31 $40,263.28 $132,202.59 Annual Costs: $1,103,271.72 $483,159.36 $1,586.431.08 200312004 Contractual Obligation EE Only (74) $15,248.48 $6,362.18 2-Party (70) $27,629.44 $13,632.96 Family (97) $54,260.70 $26,712.96 Total Monthly Costs: $97,138.62 $46,708.10 $143,846.72 Annual Costs: $1,165,663.44 $560,497.20 $1,726.160.64 Difference from Current Monthly Costs: $11,644.13 Difference from Current Annual Costs: $139,729.56 2003/2004 Costs - If City Picked Up 100% of Premiums EE Only (74) $17,441.84 $6,362.18 2-Party (70) $31,544.50 $13,632.96 Family (97) $61,794.85 $27,684.48 Total Monthly Costs: $110,781.19 $47,679.62 $158,460.81 Annual Costs: $1,329,374.28 $572,155.44 $1,901,529.72 Difference from Current Monthly Costs: $26,258.22 Difference from Current Annual Costs: $315,098.64 i Difference from Monthly Contractual Obligation: $14,614.09 Difference from Annual Contractual Obligation: $175,369.08 Calculations are based on actual 03/03 insurance enrollment S+udy AGENDA ITEM # Ses5 i b n FOR AGENDA OF MM 27, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Update on the Randall Grant Program PREPARED BY: Liz Newton I v DEPT HEAD OK ITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL An update on the Randall Funding and Development Grant Program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION No action necessary. Information only. INFORMATION SUMMARY On April 17, 2001, the City Council authorized staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for grant funding services. Two responses were received. On June 12, 2001, the Tigard City Council approved a contract with Randall Funding and Development in the amount of $68,000 for grant writing services. The contract with Randall held them responsible for obtaining at least $750,000 in grant approvals allocated to priority areas identified by the city. This guarantee was conditioned on the city authorizing application for and submission of a minimum of $2,626,000 in grant applications. A needs assessment was conducted by Randall and City staff in the summer of 2001 to identify the city's funding priorities and some federal grant opportunities. A funding strategy report was issued in the fall that emphasized pursuing grants for the new library, transportation funds, police programs, the downtown, parks and wetlands, and youth programs. After the incidents of September 11, 2001, the focus on disbursement of federal grant funds shifted quickly to Homeland Security, mostly for fire departments and similar first responders. In fact many of the grants our police programs would have been eligible for were put on hold. In addition, federal transportation dollars in the Portland Metropolitan area are funneled through Metro through a competitive process Tigard already i participates in. Funds for the library would primarily be provided through foundation grants and the bond measure had to be approved before foundations would consider grant requests for additional funding for the i library. i During the 2002-03 fiscal year, Randall Funding and Development sent weekly grant alerts and although a handful of opportunities were identified, no grants were submitted for various reasons. When the contract expired, Randall Funding and Development agreed to provide services for the current fiscal year at no charge to the city. In the current fiscal year, Randall has applied for and the city received $10,667.99 from the Department of Justice for reimbursement of half the cost of bulletproof vests. Randall has just submitted a grant application on behalf of the city of $43,244.13 for the police department for HAZMAT response equipment that was included in the Washington County Needs Assessment. In addition, Randall is preparing another grant for the police department for $105,698 for forensic video assessment equipment and AED's for each police vehicle. Staff has contacted Randall to determine what assistance they may want to provide the city in the coming fiscal year. Randall executives have expressed an interest in continuing to provide the city assistance. Staff is waiting for a written proposal. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A ATTACHMENT LIST None FISCAL NOTES No cost associated with this report. I:\admUiz\Randall Grant AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY SHEET.doc L r 'r i i i i AGENDA ITEM # SP-S5 i Dn FOR AGENDA OF May 27, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Increase Parks Fees and Charges PREPARED BY Dan Plaza, 2590 DEPT HEAD OK 0 CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Council consider staff recommendation to increase parks fees and charges. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council review and discuss the parks fees and charges schedule as presented. INFORMATION SUMMARY It has been ten years since the application fee and rental rates for park reservations (picnic shelters and fields) have been raised. They were last raised on December 8, 1992 (Council Resolution #92-57). The cumulative CPI has increased over thirty-two percent since then. Current revenues generated by fees and charges cover less than a third of the program costs. Approximately $69,000 needs to be recovered to pay for current costs associated with the program (see attached). Currently, Tigard receives approximately $24,700 from picnic fees and charges--$14K from non-resident fees and $ l OK from resident/non-profit fees. Approximately $11,654 is derived from small groups (usually families), $8,481 is derived from medium sized groups, and $4,565 is derived from large groups (usually companies). If annual CPI adjustments were made over the ten-year period 1992-2003, fees and charges would have generated $32,604 in 2002. A survey of local area agencies fees and charges was conducted (see attached). Tigard's rental rates were in the mid-range in the resident group category-under 50 people. In all other categories (50+, 100+ and 200+ people) L Tigard's rental rates were the highest for both resident and non-resident users. k The goal is to recover approximately 70% of the administrative and operational costs of the picnic shelter and fields reservation program while maintaining a 50% reduced hourly rate_for resident users. Due to the magnitude of this rate adjustment, necessitated by not adjusting the schedule since 1992, it is recognized that the change will have to be accomplished over a three-year period (1/1/04-1/1/06). The new schedule will increase revenues to $36,550 in the first year, to $42,705 in the second year and to $47,225 in the third year. Should the Council have no objections to the recommended rate schedule on May 27, the proposed rate schedule will be incorporated into the Finance Fees and Charges Resolution to be presented to Council on June 24. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Don't consider the rate schedule ATTACHMENT LIST Dan Plaza memo to Ed Wegner re: Recommendation to Increase Fees and Charges, dated May 12, 2003 FISCAL NOTES The costs to run the parks reservation program is approximately $69,000 per year. The recommended fee schedule will recover approximately 70% of the cost after three years. No new funds are needed to implement the rate increase. 1:\ADMIPACKET'03120030527TPARK RESERVATION FEES.DOC I I i I MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Wegner FROM: Dan Plaza RE: Recommendation to Increase Fees and Charges DATE: May 12, 2003 Background It has been ten years since the application fee and rental rates for park reservations (picnic shelters and fields) have been raised. They were last raised on December 8, 1992 (Council Resolution #92-57). The cumulative CPI has increased over thirty-two percent since then. Current revenues generated by fees and charges cover less than a third of the program costs. Approximately $69,000 needs to be recovered to pay for current costs associated with the program (see attached). In the future, increases to the fee schedule will be considered on a yearly basis. Yearly, nominal increases that are in response to inflationary factors, are far more acceptable than playing catch-up after a number of years of not increasing the rate schedule in response to inflationary factors. Currently, Tigard receives approximately $24,700 from picnic fees and charges--$14K from non-resident fees and $1 OK from resident/non-profit fees. Approximately $11,654 is derived from small groups (usually families), $8,481 is derived from medium sized groups, and $4,565 is derived from large groups (usually companies). If annual CPI adjustments a were made over the ten-year period 1992-2003, fees and charges would have generated $32,604 in 2002. A survey of local area agencies fees and charges was conducted (see attached). Tigard's rental rates were in the mid-range in the resident group category-under 50 people. In all M other categories (50+, 100+ and 200+ people) Tigard's rental rates were the highest for both resident and non-resident users. Current Fees and Charges Schedule Administration Fee $10.00 Resident/Non-Profit Rates Groups up to 50 $6.00/hour 51-100 $8.00/hour 101-150 $15.00/hour 151-200 $20.00/hour 201-250+ $25.00/hour Non-Resident Rates (double the resident fee) Groups up to 50 $12.00/hour 51-100 $16.001hour 101-150 $30.00/hour 151-200 $40.001hour 201-250+ $50.00/hour Soccer/fields Rentals Resident/Non-Profit $4.00/hour Non-Resident $8.00/hour The Goal The goal is to recover approximately 70% of the administrative and operational costs of the picnic shelter and fields reservation program while maintaining a 50% reduced hourly rate for resident users. Due to the magnitude of this rate adjustment, necessitated by not adjusting the schedule since 1992, it is recognized that the change will have to be accomplished over a three-year period (1/1/04-1/1/06). Recommended Fees and Charges Schedule Because fees and charges have not been increased in over 10-years, it is recommended that Council approve the following application fee and rental schedule which will accomplish the goal. It should be noted that the new, proposed hourly rate schedule charges Tigard residents 50% less than non-residents. If the recommended schedule is approved, Tigard's rates will remain the highest for both resident and non-resident rates. Further, this schedule initiates rate increases at the beginning of each calendar year rather than the beginning of each fiscal year (July 1). By doing this, we will be able to extend the new rates to the reservations made during the "reservation making season" which begins in the spring of each year. This will allow us to receive increased revenues at an earlier date each year and it will also negate a situation whereby different rates would be charged during the same year, for example, charging new rates at the beginning of the new fiscal year on July 1. Once the three-year cost recovery schedule phase-in is accomplished (see attached), it is anticipated that future rate adjustments would be tied to annual inflationary factors, and thus be nominal. An additional benefit of the three-year phase-in is it allows staff to analyze if rental rates are negatively affecting the number of yearly reservations. It is anticipated that an annual analysis of this factor would be completed, and if it is apparent that the rate schedule is negatively affecting total rental opportunities it may be necessary to amend the goal of 70% cost recovery. The following table indicates the proposed rate changes over the next three-years. This rate table maintains the principle of reduced rates for resident users. This new schedule will increase revenues to $36,550 in the first year, to $42,705 in the second year and to $47,225 in the third year. CURRENT Effective Effective Effective 1/1104 1/1/05 1/1/06 Administrative/Application Fee a) Resident/Non-profit $10.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 b) Non-resident $10.00 $50.00 $60.00 $75.00 Picnic Shelter Rental 16% increase 16% increase 4% increase 1) Resident & Non-profit Rates Groups up to 50 $6.00/hour $7.00 $8.00 $8.50 51-100 $8.00/hour $9.00 $10.50 $11.00 101-150 $15.001hour $17.50 $20.00 $21.00 151-200 $20.00/hour $23.00 $26.50 $27.50 201-250+ $25.00/hour $29.00 $33.00 $34.00 C. 2) Non-Resident Rates ie Groups up to 50 $12.00/hour $14.00 $16.00 $16.50 51-100 $16.00/hour $18.50 $21.00 $22.00 101-150 $30.00/hour $35.00 $40.00 $41.50 m 151-200 $40.00/hour $46.50 $53.00 $55.00 201-250+ $50.00/hour $58.00 $66.00 $68.50 u~ J Soccer/field Rentals i Resident $4.00/hour $4.50 $5.50 $6.00 Non-Resident $8.00/hour $9.00 $10.50 $11.00 Comparative Analysis Current '04 '05 '06 Resident under 50 people Application fee $10.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 2 hour rental $12.00 $14.00 $16.00 $17.00 Total $22.00 $34.00 $41.00 $47.00 Non-Resident under 50 people Application fee $10.00 $50.00 $60.00 $75.00 2 hour rental $24.00 $28.00 $32.00 $33.00 Total $34.00 $78.00 $92.00 $108.00 Resident over 100 people Application fee $10.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 2 hour rental $30.00 $35.00 $40.00 $42.0.0 Total $40.00 $55.00 $65.00 $72.00 Non-Resident over 100 people Application fee $10.00 $50.00 $60.00 $75.00 2 hour rental $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 $83.00 Total $70.00 $120.00 $140.00 $158.00 Resident over 200 people Application fee $10.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 2 hour rental $50.00 $58.00 $66.00 $68.00 Total $60.00 $78.00 $91.00 $98.00 L Non-Resident over 200 people [ Application fee $10.00 $50.00 $60.00 $75.00 a 2 hour rental $100.00 $116.00 $132.00 $137.00 Total $110.00 $166.00 $192.00 $212.00 'r i i i Attachments: • Administrative/Operational Costs • Survey 0 Three-Year Cost Recovery Schedule ADMINISTRATIVE/OPERATIONAL COSTS Costs Clerical: running the reservation system, processing payments, customer contacts, etc $13,264 Reservation system software, licenses, etc $2,500 Field staff set up reservations, cleaning facilities after reservations $17,082 Materials and supplies, bags, cleansers $750 Equipment/vehicles used for reservations $2,160 Insurance $2,654 Division overhead 5%-Mgr, 5%-Supvr $8,078 Facility depreciation/replacement - construction growth of 1% annually $18,278 sub-total $64,766 Department overhead - 5.79 of direct costs $3,750 TOTAL COSTS $68,516 L C J t MIN SURVEY Resident Non-Resident Adm/App Fee Group Size 1-50 Hillsboro 4.00 6.00 North Clackamas n/a n/a 100/Alcohol Lake Oswego 10.00 10.00 25/50 Oregon City 10.00 10.00 Tigard 6.00 12.00 10 Tualatin 5.00-10.00 10.00 Wilsonville 6.00 10.00 _ 100/200 West Linn 2.00 6.00 Group Size 51-100 Hillsboro 5.00 7.50 North Clackamas 5.00 6.25 100/Alcohol Lake Oswego 10.00 10.00 25/50 Oregon City 13.00 13.00 Tigard 15.00 30.00 10 Tualatin 5.00-10.00 10.00 _ Wilsonville 6.00 10.00 1001200 West Linn 4.00 10.00 Group Size 100+ Hillsboro n/a _ n/a North Clackamas 16.00 19.00 Lake Oswego n/a n/a _ Oregon City 16.25 16.25 25/50 Tigard _ 25.00 50.00 10 Tualatin 5.00-10.00 20.00 Wilsonville 7.50 12.50 100/200 West Linn 7.50 18.75 NOTE: THPRD does not have a reservation program. Shelters and fields are on a first come - first served basis a i i i i i , %1,. nur THREE-YEAR COST RECOVERY SCHEDULE Year One Year Two Year Three Increase Application Increase Increase Fee and Application Application # of Increase Fee and Fee and Current Reservations Total Revenue Hourly Potential Increase Potential Increase Potential Rate (2002) for 2002 Rate Revenue Hourly Rate Revenue Hourly Rate Revenue Application Fee - Resident/Non-Profit 10.00 285 $2,850 20.00 $5,700 25.00 $7,125 30.00 $8,550 Application Fee - Non Resident 10.00 153 $1,530 50.00 $7,650 60.00 $9,180 75.00 $11,475 Total Application Fees 438 $4,380 $13,350 $16,305 $20,025 Hourly Rental Rate - varies by Resident/Non-Profit group size 285 $9,000 16% $10,440 32% $11,880 36% $12,240 Hourly Rental Rate - Non varies by Resident group size 153 $11,000 16% $12,760 32% $14,520 36% $14,960 Total Hourly Rate Fees 438 $20,000 $23,200 $26,400 $27,200 Grand Total 4 38 $24,380 $36,550 $42,705 $47,225 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder DATE: May 23, 2003 SUBJECT: Supplemental Information - May 27, 2003, Council Meeting Attached are two memos to supplement information Council received in its meeting packet for the May 27, 2003, Council meeting. These memos include information on: 1. Status of Legislative Issues (for Council's information for the discussion with our legislators) 2. Information about the referendum process. Staff has had some discussion about the possibility of a referendum to the voters if a street maintenance fee is adopted. This information is being provided to the Council so members would be knowledgeable of the process and sample timeline for a referendum. 1:1ADMIPACKET'0312003052-ASUPPLEMENTAL PACKET MEMO.DOC MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council A FROM: Liz Newton, Assistant to the City Manager O-V DATE: May 23, 2003 SUBJECT: Status of Legislative Issues In preparation for your discussion with Senator Burdick and Representative Williams at the May 27 council meeting, department directors have prepared summaries of legislation they have been tracking. Copies of the summaries are attached along with corresponding letters that have been sent to Senator Burdick and Representative Williams. This memo briefly summarizes the legislation that is still under discussion or undecided, the city's position and the impact the proposed legislation would have on the city if adopted. Labor Issues Three bills to revise SB 750, adopted in 1995: SB 444 - This legislation would revise the definition of comparable communities used in arbitration to eliminate the requirement that comparisons be made only to cities of similar size. It would also elevate public safety services above all other local service considerations as it relates to interest arbitrations. 6 SB 445 - This legislation would expand the composition of police and fire bargaining units to include any supervisory employee that does not have the authority to exercise economic discipline. Even the Police Chief could potentially j be included in a bargaining unit. SB 445 - This legislation would require employers to bargain over staffing levels that have a potential impact on on-the-job safety for police and fire fighter unions. This bill would subject the matter of staffing levels and workload issue to a third party arbitrator to determine in the event binding arbitration is pursued, taking considerable economic and service decision making out of the hands of local government. 7~ Attached is a copy of Mayor Griffith's letter to Senator Burdick and Representative Williams opposing all three of these proposed bills. In short, adoption of these bills will tip the scales to the unions and negatively amend SB 750, as well as being detrimental and burdensome to our budget, service objectives, and staff. Engineering Issues SB 585 - Significantly restricts the ability of local jurisdictions to implement street user fees. The city strongly opposes any attempts to cap, limit, or pre-empt street user fees. SB 881 - Prohibits local governments and districts from imposing local gas taxes. It also prohibits any cities and counties that already have a local gas tax from increasing the tax. The city strongly opposes any attempts to limit or pre-empt the ability of local governments to raise revenue through local taxes or fees and opposes this bill. Planning and Building Issues SB 378 - Sets a cap of $250 for land use appeals and requires local governments to refund or reimburse appeal fees and transcript costs incurred by one who successfully appeals a local land use decision. The state statute also limits the appeal fee to $250 for an appeal if there hasn't been a local hearing. The problem with doing it with all appeals is that it could encourage frivolous appeals on many cases, unduly delaying and slowing down the development process for legitimate approvals by NIMBYs. The problem for local government in times of financial problems is that the cost of processing these appeals runs into the thousands of dollars in costs that cannot be recovered. It puts a bigger burden on the taxpayer to pay the bill in the long run. HB 2905 - Requires that the methodology for establishing improvement fees promote the objective of future system users contributing no more than an equitable share to the cost of existing facilities. It would extend the time to file legal action challenging the methodology for calculating system development charges for 60 to (yet to be determined) days. This bill was sponsored by Max Williams at the request of Oregonians in Action. Attached is a copy of a letter dated April 25 from the city to Representative Williams and Senator Burdick opposing HB 2906 because of uncertainty and undue burden the "re-opening at any time" provision would cause local governments. Also attached is a coy of a letter written by Representative Williams in support of the provisions of HB 2906-A and noting that it is unlikely the bill will come to the floor this session. Library Issues HB 3101 and SB 656 - Both of these bills would require local governments to install filtering software on all public workstations at local libraries. The state library estimates the cost for each individual library to install filters at $3,000 with an additional annual cost of $1,000. In these difficult economic times, requiring mandatory filters places an unreasonable financial burden on local governments. The Tigard library has a policy and procedures in place, which provide for filtering software on two Internet stations. These policies were determined by the Library Board and are reviewed on a regular basis. The city believes these polices should be determined at the local level. Finance Issues HB 2267 - Creates statewide 1 percent hotel/motel tax and pre-empts any additional local hotel/motel taxes unless dedicated to tourism promotion. The city supports the statewide tax, but strongly opposes local pre-emption because it takes away the city's ability to raise local revenues. Public Contracting HB 3303-EN - Interest on bills would become due only 15 days after a bill is submitted for payment. The city opposes this bill because it limits the time available to conduct review of the charges as necessary and the ability to batch bills for payment. Worker's Compensation HB 3334 - Prohibits wage and benefit reductions for public safety officers on worker's compensation time loss. The TPOA contract prohibits this practice, but the city is opposed to it being mandated by r, the state. r HB 3567 - This bill, if passed, would require affirmative Worker's Comp coverage for police officers whether they were exposed at work or not if they have any disease of the a lungs or respiratory tract, hypertension or cardiovascular, or. renal, liver disease or infections exposure to air or blood-bome agents as long as the employee did not have the J disease prior to starting work. The city opposes this bill because Worker's Compensation coverage is intended for on- the-job exposures. May 20, 2003 TO: William A. Monahan, City Manager FROM: Sandy Zodrow, Human Resources Director RE: Update on Current Legislation The following represents a status summary of those collective bargaining and PERS related bills which we have been tracking: HR 2001: cap on PERS earnings Governor Kulongoski has signed this House Bill into law. The bill provided an 8 percent annual cap on earnings for a Tier One member's regular account until the deficit account has been eliminated and the reserve account has been fully funded in each of the three immediately preceding calendar years. HR 2003: multiple elements House Bill 2003, which the Governor has signed into law, has several components: a) It will eliminate the 6% member contribution to the member's PERS retirement account. The money will go into a transition account. Employers will be mandated to continue to pick up the 6 percent member contribution for two years if they currently pay the contribution. After two years, the member contribution will continue but employees will bargain with employers regarding who will pay the contribution. b) Halts the 8 percent annual crediting to Tier One member accounts until the deficit account is eliminated. c) Ensures that a lifetime average of the assumed rate (currently 8 percent) will be credited to the member's PERS account at retirement. d) Temporarily removes future cost of living allowance (COLA) increases for members who retired between April 1, 2000 and April 1, 2004 under the Money Match calculation. PERS will recalculate the member retirement benefit based on a lower crediting amount for 1999 (11.33 percent vs 20 percent). Once the frozen benefit adjusts to the lower crediting level, COLA payments would begin again. HE! 2004: Updates PERS mortality tables Governor Kulongoski has signed House Bill 2004C into law with an effective date of July 1, 2003. This bill updates mortality tables used to calculate monthly pension payments for PERS participants. HB 2005: PERS Board House Bill 2005 was signed into law by the Governor, and contains the following sections: a) It reduces the PERS Board from 12 to 5 members b) Provides that the Governor appoint five Board members to begin terms on September 1, 2003 c) Stipulates that one Board member must be a state employee in a management position (when appointed and throughout the term of appointment) or a person who holds an elective office (by election or appointment) in the governing body of a participating public employer other than the state. One member must be a public employee. Three Board members must be from the private sector with no interest in the benefits provided by PERS. d) Staggers the length of terms for Board members. SB 444: Changes interest arbitration factors SB 444 changes the factors considered in interest arbitration. This proposed legislation favors unions by revising the definition of "comparable communities" used in arbitration to eliminate the requirement that comparisons be made only to cities of similar size. This will roll back some of the achievements employers obtained in the passage of SB 750 back in 1995. This bill also would elevate public safety services above all other local service considerations as it relates to interest arbitrations. It would strengthen the position of public safety bargaining units at the expense of other city services. A hearing was held May 19 before a House Committee, and the matter remains undecided at this time. Sf3 445: Expands covered positions SB 445 would expand the composition of police and fire bargaining units to include any supervisory employee that does not have the authority to exercise economic discipline (Le suspension, demotion, termination). Even the Police Chief could potentially be included in a bargaining unit! Current law excludes supervisory positions due to their ability to hire, adjust grievances, discipline and other factors. This proposal radically changes the content of public safety bargaining units. A hearing was held May 19 before a House Committee, and the matter remains undecided at this time. SB 446; Staffing levels subject to n2gotiations SB 446 would require employers to bargain over staffing levels that have a "potential" impact on the on-the-job safety for police and firefighter unions. This bill would subject the matter of staffing levels and workload issues to a third party arbitrator to determine in the event binding arbitration is pursued. This would take considerable economic and service decision making out of the hands of local government. Both SB 445 and SB 446 would significantly undo the gains employers made with the passage of SB 750 in 1995. A hearing was held May 19 before a House Committee, and the matter remains undecided at this time. i i i i i CITY OF TIGARD Engineering Department Shaping A Beller Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-624-0752 TO: Bill Monahan City Manager FROM: Gus Duenas 1° City Engineer DATE: May 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Update on Current Legislation The following are summaries of the legislative bills that we are currently tracking: SB 585 - Significantly limits ability for local jurisdictions to implement Street'User Fees This bill significantly restricts the ability of local jurisdictions to implement street user fees. City's Position: The City strongly opposes any attempts to cap, limit, or pre-empt Street User Fees. Bill Status: The bill was sponsored by the Committee on Transportation and Economic A Development and is currently still in that committee. A public hearing was conducted on April 3, 2003. Mayor Griffith sent a letter to Senator Rick Metsger, the Committee Chair, strongly opposing the bill. The League of Oregon Cities testified in opposition to iD the bill using testimony provided by cities and other jurisdictions against the bill. The bill has not been referred out of Committee. J SB 881- Prohibits local governments and districts from imposing or increasing taxes on motor vehicle fuel. This bill prohibits local governments and districts from imposing local gas taxes. It also prohibits any cities and counties that already have a local gas tax from increasing the tax. City's Position: The City strongly opposes any attempts to limit or pre-empt the ability of local governments to raise revenue through local taxes or fees. Hence, the City opposes this bill, which prohibits local governments from imposing taxes on motor vehicle fuel. Bill Status: The bill was sponsored by the Committee on Rules. It has been referred to the Committee on Revenue. No public hearing has yet been scheduled for this bill. c: Liz Newton 1:\Eng\Gus\Memorandums\Current Legislation Update.doc Current Legislation Update Page 2 of 2 May 23, 2003 CITY OF TIGAR® OREGON The Honorable Ginny Burdick State Senator 900 Court Street, NE, S-317 Salem, OR 97301 Re: Senate Bills 444, 445, and 446 Dear Ginny: I am writing to you on behalf of the City of Tigard in expressing our deepest concerns and objections to the proposed Senate Bills 444, 445, and 446. If approved, these bills will have serious long-term impacts on the City's financial health and its ability to determine the personnel and service provisions most appropriate for our jurisdiction. It is important to note that the current collective bargaining regulations, which these bills significantly impact, only date back to 1995 when SB 750 was passed. We believe SB 750 has proven to be an effective piece of legislation for both union and management parties, and there is no compelling reason to change. The provisions are fair, and they do not disproportionately advantage either side. Adoption of these proposed Senate Bills will tip the scales to the unions and negatively amend SB 750. As an example, SB 445 goes much further beyond the current language by potentially including managers into bargaining units who currently have a great deal of responsibility for directing large numbers of staff, establishing policy, and exercising discipline. The current criteria relative to this bill was only established less than 8 years ago. We believe that SB 750 is not broken, and it does not need fixing. L rr 1 am certain that the citizens of Tigard would join me in finding these proposed o bills to be detrimental and burdensome to our budget, service objectives and staff. I urge you to defeat these measures. i Sincerely, s i im Griffith Mayor I:tAD~YOR GRIFFITMO03%SENATOR BURDICK - COLLECTIVE BARGAINING LEGIS.DOC 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 May 23, 2003 CITY OF TIGAR® OREGON The Honorable Max Williams State Representative 900 Court Street, NE, H-276 Salem, OR 97301 Re: Senate Bills 444, 445, and 446 Dear Max: I am writing to you on behalf of the City of Tigard in expressing our deepest concerns and objections to the proposed Senate Bills 444, 445, and 446. If approved, these bills will have serious long-term impacts on the City's financial health and its ability to determine the personnel and service provisions most appropriate for our jurisdiction. It is important to note that the current collective bargaining regulations, which these bills significantly impact, only date back to 1995 when SB 750 was passed. We believe SB 750 has proven to be an effective piece of legislation for both union and management parties, and there is no compelling reason to change. The provisions are fair, and they do not disproportionately advantage either side. Adoption of these proposed Senate Bills will tip the scales to the unions and negatively amend SB 750. As an example, SB 445 goes much further beyond the current language by potentially including managers into bargaining units who currently have a great deal of responsibility for directing large numbers of staff, establishing policy, and exercising discipline. The current criteria relative to this bill was only established less than 8 years ago. We believe that SB 750 is not broken, and it does not need fixing. am certain that the citizens of Tigard would join me in finding these proposed bills to be detrimental and burdensome to our budget, service objectives and staff. I urge you to defeat these measures. Sincerely, l'im Griffith Mayor I:%ADMWIAYOR GRIFFITM20031,SENATOR BURDICK - COLLECTIVE BARGAINING LEGIS.DOC 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard OR 97223 (503) 639-4 1 71 TDD (503) 684-2772 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Bill Monahan FROM: Jim Hendryx DATE: May 23, 2003 SUBJECT: Update on Current Legislation Following are summaries of current legislative bills and CD comments: SB 378 - sets cap on land use appeals This bill sets a statewide cap of $250 for land use appeals and requires local governments to refund or reimburse appeal fees and transcript costs incurred by person who successfully appeals local land use decision. Comments: The state statue also limits the appeal fee to $250 for an appeal if there hasn't been a local hearing. The problem with doing it with all appeals is that if could encourage frivolous appeals on many cases, unduly delaying and slowing the development process for legitimate approvals by IWMBYS. The problem for local government in times of financial problems is that the cost of processing these appeals runs into the $1,000's of dollars in costs that cannot be recovered. It puts a bigger burden on the tax payer to pay the bill in the long run. The City should oppose this bill through LOC affiliated groups, such as the Oregon City Planning Directors Association (OCPDA). OCPDA will decide whether to take an official position on this bill at its 4125103 meeting and then proceed with testimony, etc. As of 519103: Oregon City Planning Directors Association did not take a position on this specific bill. We continue to oppose this bill. Staff will follow this bill and decide how to proceed. HQ 2689 - Urban Growth Boundary Elimination Act of 2003 Authorizes counties to designate rural development zones without adopting exceptions to statewide planning goals relating to urbanization or to public facilities and services. Establishes criteria for rural economic planning in rural development zones. t Comments: This bill would allow urban development outside the UGB. It would allow urban levels of development on over 50,000 acres of rural "exception" lands. This could cost taxpayers money to service that development with new infrastructure and could hurt farmers and foresters. The Govemor's office does not support this bill and will most likely veto it. The City should oppose this bill through LOC affiliated groups, such as the Oregon City Planning Directors Association (OCPDA). OCPDA will decide whether to take an official position on this bill at its 4125103 meeting and then proceed with testimony, etc. As of 519103: Oregon City Planning Directors Association did not take a position on this specific bill. Staff will follow this bill and decide how to proceed. The bill appears to have extensive opposition. The City has not taken an official position on this bill. HB 2595 -Affordable Housing Repeals prohibition on real estate transfer taxes. Would allow local governments to implement a real estate transfer tax to fund affordable housing. Comments: The City should oppose this bill through LOC affiliated groups, such as the Oregon City Planning Directors Association (OCPDA). OCPDA will decide whether to take an official position on this bill at its 4125103 meeting and then proceed with testimony, etc. Referred to Revenue. As of 519103: Oregon City Planning Directors Association did not take a position on this specific bill. Staff will follow this bill and decide how to proceed. HQ 2906 Requires that methodology for establishing improvement fees promote objective of future system users contributing no more than equitable share to cost of existing facilities. Extends time to file legal action challenging methodology for calculating system development charge from 60 days to (yet to be determined) days. Comments: This bill is being sponsored by Max Williams at the request of Oregonians in Action. On April 25th, the City sent a letter to Max Williams and Ginny Burdick expressing opposition to this bill (attached). On May 9th, Max Williams sent a letter in response (also attached). The bill was referred back to Committee and Rep. Williams does not expect it to come to the floor again this session.. 2 MAX WILLIAMS Committees: State Representative Chair: DISTRICT 35 101 Judiciary i . We Member: ` Revenue HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 900 COURT ST NE SALEM, OREGON 97301 ~qr 13 DoT May 9, 2003 ~a~Vn/S e0493 William Monahan Tigard City Manager Copies to: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Mayor/Council Other: Tigard, OR 97223 City Manager t/ 4 MM- Council File bra= Subject: HB 2906-A Dear Mr. Monahmi, Thank you for your letter regarding House Bill 2906-A, which would modify the statutory provisions relating to the assessment and collection of System Development Charges (SDCs).: As you are likely aware, the bill was referred back to Committee and I don't expect it wiill me'to the floor again this session.. While I appreciate your_concems, I.believe HB 2906-A levels the playing field between local. goverament and the small business community, while .at the same time allowing local government to collect SDCs that are needed to offset the impacts caused by new development within the community. I believe there are two fundamental flaws in the existing statutory scheme. First, existing provisions allow local governments to impose SDCs that exceed the cost of providing the infrastructure improvements needed to offset the impact of the development. As you indicated in your letter, SDCs are important revenue sources for local governments, as they allow jurisdictions to impose "an equitable share" of the cost of capital facilities upon new development. I agree with that concept. Unfortunately, current law does not limit local governments to the imposition of an "equitable share," but instead allows local governments to impose SDCs that can exceed an "equitable share." The second flaw in existing law lies in the failure to allow for "as applied" challenges to SDCs. Current law limits challenges to 60 days of the date of adoption of the methodology. But, what happens if an SDC methodology is adopted in 1995, but the actual SDC is not imposed on a property owner until 2003? Is it fair to expect the property owners in the community to appear before the city council in.1995,-on the off chance that they may submit a development application in 2003, and-desire to challenge an.SDC imposed upon them at that time when it doesn't reflect an "equitable share?" I do not believe that it is. Office: 900 Court St NE H-276. Salem, OR 97301 - Phone: 503-986-1435 - reP-n1axwi11iarnS@,state.or.us District: 12103 SW 135th Ave., Tigard, OR 97223 - Phone: 503-5254275 I appreciate the desire of local governments to maintain some certainty in the adoption of an SDC methodology. But that certainty should not be allowed to insulate the local government from legitimate claims that an SDC, as applied to a particular property owner, imposes inequitable burdens on that property owner, such that the property owner is being forced to pay for infrastructure that exceeds the impact caused by his/her development proposal. As you indicated in your letter, it is true that local revenues are at low levels and that basic services are threatened. But SDCs are not the appropriate tool for raising revenue beyond the amount necessary to ensure that growth pays for itself. House Bill 2906-A ensures that local governments can continue to require growth to pay for itself. But requiring new businesses (as well as existing local businesses that desire to expand) to shoulder more than their fair share of infrastructure costs acts as a disincentive to economic activity and job creation-something we obviously desperately need. I am comforted by your statement regarding the rarity of legal challenges to SDC methodologies. It seems to me that a well-crafted methodology would result in very few legal challenges, simply because a land use applicant would know that his or her SDC assessment was an accurate reflection of the impact of the development on the local government infrastructure. That will not change under HB 2906-A. But in those rare circumstances where the SDC calculation results in a fee that is grossly disproportionate to the actual impact caused by a property owner's proposed development, that owner should have a remedy. Finally, I appreciate your argument regarding the use of averages to calculate individual SDCs, and realize that that is a common practice. But HB 2906-A will not deter local government from using averages when preparing their methodology. In fact, if HB 2906-A is adopted, a local government could continue to use its methodology, and require a property owner wishing to challenge an SDC calculation to provide a professionally prepared study to document the actual impacts resulting from the proposed development. That would create a far more equitable system, and, contrary to your letter, I don't believe it would be impractical or burdensome on local government to fairly address these issues. As you know, I am always open to suggestions on how to improve legislation, including HB 2906-A. If you have any suggestions, feel free to contact me. I took .forward to seeing you soon. .Regards, R . Max Williams cc: Tigard Mayor Jim Griffith A4 CITY OF TIGARD MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Bill Monahan FROM: Margaret Barnes. DATE: May 20, 2003 SUBJECT: Legislative Update Following are summaries of current legislative bills and comments: Although several library-related bills were introduced in this legislative session, the only ones of major significance are HB 3101 and SB 0656. HB 3101-Internet Filtering "Directs public libraries to install filtering software on library computer terminals that provide Internet access to public." Currently this bill is in the General Government Committee. This bill would require local governments to install filtering software on all public workstations at local public libraries. SB 0656 -Internet Filtering "Directs public libraries to install filtering software on computer terminals that provide access to Internet in children's areas or near children's areas." Currently this bill is in the Judiciary Committee. Each of these bills would require local governments to install filtering software on all public workstations at local public libraries. > Comments: There is a widespread perception on both sides of the political spectrum that both these pieces of legislation are unconstitutional because implementation would block access to constitutionally protected speech. Also, filtering software is often ineffective in adequately "protecting" unwitting Internet users from viewing pornographic sites. i The League of Oregon Cities is currently tracking HR 3101. The last activity on this legislation was on May 1 when a work session was held. Legislative Counsel Greg Chaimov testified then that the bill would violate the constitution. The State Library estimates the cost for each individual library to install filters to be $3,000 with an additional annual cost of $1,000. In these difficult economic times mandating filters places an unreasonable financial burden on local governments. The Oregon Library Association testified that many libraries have filtering software or policies on Internet use, and there has not been a problem regulating access to the Internet. If these bills come out of Committee the City should oppose them through the LOC and OLA. These items should be determined at the local level. It is beyond the purview of the state to mandate the installation of filters. The Tigard Public Library has a policy and procedures in place regarding public access to the Internet. These policies were determined by the Library Board and are reviewed on a regular basis. MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Monahan, City Manager Liz Newton, Assistant to the City Manager FROM: Craig Prosse&inance Director RE: Legislative Items DATE: May 23, 2003 Finance is tracking the following legislative items. HB 2906-A Introduced by Representative Williams at the request of Oregonians in Action. Amendments to the bill would allow anyone charged a Systems Development Charge or traffic Impact Fee to challenge the basic methodology setting the fee at any time the fee is levied, rather than at the initial adoption of the fee or fee increase. City of Tigard Position: Strongly oppose. This bill attempts to overturn court decisions in the Rogers Machinery case and would preclude ever coming to conclusion on SDC (r TIF) methodology. ■ Passed Committee and went to the floor of the house ■ The House referred this item back to committee, where it is expected to die ■ Rep. Williams still thinks this is a fine idea. HB 2267 Creates statewide 1% Hotel/Motel Tax and Pre-empts any additional local Hotel/Motel Taxes unless dedicated to tourism promotion. City of Tigard Position: Support 1% statewide tax, but strongly oppose local pre-emption i Still in committee ■ Governor is supporting 1% statewide tax, but his position on local pre-emption is unclear. State Budget Discussions In addition to these bills, Finance is watching the state budget discussions for possible impacts on the City of Tigard. MEMORANDUM To: Liz Newton FROM: Loreen Mills SUBJECT: 2003 LEGISLATION MONITORING DATE: May 23, 2003 There are three areas of legislative concern that Risk is following: municipal liability, public contracting, and workers comp. Following is a list of highlights. Municipal Liability NOTE: 31 bills under this topic have not moved along far enough or are not a concern to require constant monitoring. BB2276-A Injured worker litigation Would permit compensatory and punitive damages in civil action for violation of certain injured worker rights (unlawful employment practices) - retro to 1/1/02. MONITORING. Public Contracting NOTE: There are a total of 25 bills under this topic that are being monitored with 9 that Risk opposes. The two listed below are the ones with the most recent actions occurring in the legislature. RB2341-A Major revision to public contracting requirements & procedures This bill would clean up Chapter 279 (Public Purchasing Rules) making procedures clearer and the process cleaner. SUPPORTING BB3303-EN Public Improvement Contract billing Interest would become due only 15 days after a contractor submits as bill to the City. OPPOSING Workers' Compensation NOTE: 30 bills are being tracked under this topic. RB3334 Prohibits wage & benefit reductions for public safety officers on Workers Compensation time loss. This is consistent with current TPOA contract requirements, however, not mandated at this time by state law. OPPOSING. IM35 67 Establishes presumption of compensability for public safety officers in Workers Compensation claims This bill, if passed, would require affirmative Workers comp coverage for police officers whether they were exposed at work or not if they have any disease of the lungs or respiratory tract, hypertension or cardiovascular, or renal, liver disease or infections exposure to air or blood-borne agents as lone as the employee did not have the disease prior to starting work. OPPOSING. Loreen\C:\My Documents\Legislation Tracking Memo 5-22-03.doc MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Bill Monahan, City Manager FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder DATE: May 23, 2003 SUBJECT: Referendum Process There has been some discussion about a referendum to the voters of any ordinance the Council may approve to implement a street maintenance fee. Here is the process and an estimated timeframe: • Petitioners could file a petition any time after the ordinance is adopted, but the filing must be completed before the ordinance takes effect, which is no later than the 30th day after adoption of a non-emergency ordinance. To determine the deadline, for submitting signatures, day one is the first day after the ordinance is passed by Council. For a referendum petition on an ordinance, the number of signatures required to refer the ordinance to the voters is not less than ten percent of the active registered voters in the City (as of today, 10% = 2,203). • After the City Recorder receives a prospective referendum petition, two copies are forwarded to the City Attorney for preparation of the ballot title. The City Attorney has five business days to prepare a ballot title and return it to the City Recorder. The ballot title drafting process and the collection of signatures occur simultaneously. Once the chief petitioners have received written approval to circulate from the City Recorder, the chief petitioners may begin collecting signatures. The chief petitioners do not have to wait for the ballot title before collecting signatures. C The City Recorder publishes a receipt of ballot title in the next available edition of a newspaper of general circulation in the City. Any registered Oregon voter who is dissatisfied with the ballot title may petition the City Council to review the ballot title issued by the City Attorney. The deadline to file a petition to review the ballot title is no later than the seventh day after the ballot title is filed with the City Recorder. • Once at least 100 percent of the required number of signatures are gathered, the petitioner may submit them to the City Recorder (no later than the 30th day after the ordinance was adopted). • After receiving the signature sheets, the City Recorder verifies the signatures to determine if the referendum contains enough valid signatures to qualify for the ballot. Signature verification must be completed no later than the 15th calendar day after submitted. • After the signature verification has been completed and there are enough signatures to refer the matter to the ballot, the City Recorder notifies the County Elections Official. The election will be held on the next available election date, which is no sooner than the 9& day after the referendum petition was filed with the City Recorder. Attached is a sample timeline for referring an ordinance that was adopted on June 24, 2003. I:\ADIV~CATHY\ELECTION\PROCEDURES\REFERENDUM.DOC 't "v 1 1 i 1 Sample Timeline Referendum Council adopts ordinance June 24, 2003 Recorder receives prospective petition and reviews for completion. June 25, 2003 Petitioners can begin circula- ting petition for signatures June 27, 2003 City Attorney writes the Ballot Title within five business days No later than: July 2, 2003 Petition signature sheets are submitted with at least 2,203 signatures (Tigard active registered voters) No later than July 24, 2003 City Recorder verifies signatures No later than August 8, 2003 County is notified of city referendum measure if enough signatures verified August 8, 2003 Referendum appears on ballot November 4, 2003 CL I:WDMICATFMELECTIONIPROCEDURESIREFERENDUM.DOC H G~ _J a a u r AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE : MAY 27, 2003 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Manager prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED VISITOR'S AGENDA Page 1 AGENDA ITEM # -3-Q CC FOR AGENDA OF May 27, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award of Contract for the Construction of Walnut Terrace - Street & Storm Draina e Im rovements PREPARED BY: Vannie Nguyen DEPT HEAD OK: Agustin P. Duenas CITY MGR OK: Bil onahan ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the Local Contract Review Board approve the contract award for the construction of Walnut Terrace - Street & Storm Drainage Improvements? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve the contract award to D&D Concrete & Utilities in the amount of $138,279.25. INFORMATION SUMMARY Walnut Terrace, classified as a local street, runs in an easterly direction approximately 880 feet from 69th Avenue to its terminus at the boundary between City of Tigard and City of Portland. It has a deteriorated 20- foot wide paved surface that only stretches for 150 feet from the intersection at 69`h Avenue. The entire remaining length of the street consists of gravel at varying widths. There are no existing curbs or sidewalk on the street. Because of a lack of standard drainage facilities in the street, property owners have installed non-standard catch basins and pipes on both sides of the street to alleviate flooding problems that occur almost every year. The project proposes to pave the entire street, widen the street to a width of 28 feet, install curb on both sides, and install a concrete driveway apron and driveway transition for each property. This project also proposes to install a drainage system that includes 540 feet of 15-inch storm mainline and 4 catch basins to serve as an intercept for all existing roof drains and non-abandoned pipes. The project was advertised for bids on April 28, 2003. The bid opening was conducted on May 12, 2003 and the bid results are: D&D Concrete & Utilities Tualatin, OR $138,279.25 CR Wood Trucking Sherwood, OR $138,795.40 Wayne Jeskey Construction Clackamas, OR $151,982.00 Canby Excavating Canby, OR $152,571.40 Kerr Contractors Tualatin, OR $157,046.20 Parker Northwest Paving Oregon City, OR $157,387.65 CivilWorks Vancouver, WA $160,363.00 Nutter Corporation Vancouver, WA $167,450.90 Engineer's Estini<ate $136,900 Based on the bids submitted, the lowest responsive bid of $138,279.25 submitted by D&D Concrete & Utilities appears to be reasonable. Staff recommends approval of the contract award to this lowest bidder. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMiv MEE STRATEGY This project meets the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow Transportation and Traffic Goals of "Improve Traffic Safety". ATTACHMENT LIST Project location map FISCAL NOTES This project is funded from the State Gas Tax fund in the amount of $60,000 in the FY 2002-03 CIP. This project is also proposed to be funded from the State Gas Tax fund and Storm Drainage fund in the amount of $40,000 and $45,000 respectively in the FY 2003-04 CIP. The total amount of $145,000 is sufficient to award the contract of $138,279.25 to D&D Concrete & Utilities. I:%eng\2002-200.3 fy dptwalnut terracelcoundl agenda summary for walnut terrace.doc I VGVYY7YY.Y Y Y ~ Y IVr WALNUT TERRACE STREET AND STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 69TH AVE TO CITY LIMITS TAYLDRS FERRY N r~ KINGSVIEW CT n 5 S WALNUT TERRACE y~ o LANE SFIADY LALA LN ALFRED STREET ELlAWDDD ST BARBARA LN VENTURA AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF May 27, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Discussion with State Senator Ginny Burdick and State Representative Max Williams PREPARED BY: Greer Gaston DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL A discussion with State Senator Ginny Burdick and State Representative Max Williams on issues of interest to Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Identify issues of interest or concern for Senator Burdick and Representative Williams. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Legislative Assembly convened on January 13, 2003. As long as the Assembly is in session, Senator Burdick and Representative Williams will meet with Council on the 4ch Tuesday of each month during the Council business meeting to update Council on legislative activities. A packet of information on pending legislation will be mailed to Council on Friday, May 23. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY o? Communication Goal #1, Action Committee Strategy: "Encourage public participation through accessibility and education." FISCAL NOTES None. .y I, AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF May 27, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUEIAGENDA TITLE Street Maintenance Fee PREPARED BY: A.P.GDuuenas DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL City Council will consider the information provided to date regarding the proposed Street Maintenance Fee, review the various options available, and provide staff with direction regarding possible implementation of the fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Council consider various options on the proposed Street Maintenance Fee and provide staff with direction on possible implementation of the fee. INFORMATION SUMMARY On April 22, 2003, a public hearing was held to consider the formation of a Street Maintenance Fee. Staff presented a report describing the need for the fee, the basis for establishment of the fee, and the proposed rates for various land uses. Members of the business community provided testimony regarding concerns about the proposed fee. Citizens also testified for and against the proposed fee. Council submitted a list of questions and- reviewed the responses to those questions at the Council meeting on May 13, 2003. Council indicated that they would decide on a course of action regarding the proposed fee at the May 27, 2003 Council meeting. The following are some options that Council could consider in providing direction to staff: Option 1: Implement the proposed Street Maintenance Fee with all four elements as recommended by the Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force. Those elements are Street Maintenance, Sidewalk Maintenance, Rights-of-Way Maintenance, and Street Light and Traffic Signal System Maintenance. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance for Council consideration. Option 2: Implement the Street Maintenance Fee as proposed, but limit the scope to the elements covering Street Maintenance and Street Light and Traffic Signal System Maintenance. This would raise approximately $1.25 million (instead of the $1.6 million in the current proposal). The Sidewalk and Rights-of-Way Maintenance could be considered at some future time. Option 3: Implement the Street Maintenance Fee on a 50-50 basis with the residential and non-residential uses sharing the assessments equally. This option could be with all four maintenance elements, or with two maintenance elements as recommended in Option 2. Option 4: Implement the Street Maintenance Fee, but adjust the residential share of the burden to be more balanced and less burdensome to the non-residential uses. The current ratio is 28% residential, 72% non-residential. The residential share could be increased to bear a higher percentage of the revenue to be generated. Option 5: Delay adoption of the fee. Direct the formation of a special committee consisting of some members of the Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force and representatives of the business community to meet and reach consensus on a fee that would be acceptable to the City and the business community. Direct that a report with recommendation be submitted to Council within three or four months after the committee is formed and begins to meet. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Timely maintenance of public street infrastructure meets the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow goal of Improve Traffic Safety. The implementation of the Street Maintenance Fee meets the goal of Identi and Develop Funding Resources. ATTACHMENT LIST 1. Complete Street Maintenance Fee Updated Study Report dated October 4, 2003 with all Appendices as follows: a. Appendix A-1: City of Tigard Street Maintenance needs b. Appendix A-2: Long-Term Program for Annual Street Maintenance c. Appendix B-1: Street Maintenance Element d. Appendix B-2: Right-of-Way Maintenance element e. Appendix B-3: Sidewalk Maintenance Element f. Appendix B-4: Street Light Maintenance Element g. Appendix C: Summary of Rates h. Appendix D: Adjustments for Pass-By Trips 2. Answers to Council Questions for the 5/13/03 Council Meeting Discussion 3. Additional Information provided to City Council from City Engineer 4. Frequently Asked Questions (Street Maintenance Fee) 5. Updated Street Maintenance Needs (Appendix A-1 updated May 2003) FISCAL NOTES The implementation of the Street Maintenance Fee as proposed by the Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force would provide a stable source of funding for street maintenance, limited right-of-way maintenance, limited sidewalk maintenance, and street light and traffic signal system energy costs and maintenance. I:\Eng\Gus\Council Agenda Summaries\Agenda Summary - Street Maintenance Fee Direction - May 27, 2003.doc A4. City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-0752 Street Maintenance Fee Updated Study Report Produced by: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E. City Engineer gus@ci.tigard.or.us October 4, 2002 i Updated Street Maintenance Fee Report October 4, 2002 Background City Council, through Resolution No. 01-06, formed a Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force to evaluate and recommend to Council feasible alternative funding sources for street maintenance and street expansion needs. The Task Force recommended implementation of a transportation user fee (to be called the Street Maintenance Fee) to provide a stable source of revenue for street maintenance. The Need for Timely Maintenance Much of the street infrastructure in the City is old and was not designed for heavy trucks and buses, which accelerate deterioration and greatly increase maintenance requirements. Pavement condition is typically quantified by the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) which rates the pavement according to the extent and severity of distress types present (cracking, rutting, shoving, etc.). Studies have shown that pavement condition worsens at an increasing rate as the pavement gets older. The reason for this is that deterioration begins mostly at the surface, then progresses down into the underlying layers as surface cracks develop. A typical pavement without rehabilitation will experience a 40% drop in PCI during the first 75% of its life and an additional 40% drop during the following 12% of its life. Restoration of pavement near the end of its service life will typically cost 4 to 5 times more than the rejuvenation performed in a timely manner. The City's Pavement Management System reported a preventative and corrective pavement maintenance backlog of approximately $2 million dollars as of 1999 (Appendix A-1). About half of this amount was for slung seals while the remainder was for pavement overlays. Because the street ratings were performed in 1999, these streets have further deteriorated since then should be reassessed within the next year or two. Some of the pavement overlays required are on major streets (such as Gaarde Street), which are already scheduled for reconstruction and widening as part of a major street expansion project. However, the streets that require overlays and slurry seals, but are not programmed as part of a major expansion project, would need to be addressed as part of a long-term program of corrective and preventative pavement maintenance. Because the maintenance backlog cannot be reduced quickly without a large infusion of funding, most of C the streets reported as requiring slurry seals are anticipated to require pavement overlay instead by the time the work is actually performed to bring pavement conditions back to acceptable standards. Some streets that needed pavement overlay in 1999 may require reconstruction by the time the funding becomes available to address those streets. i The State Gas Tax Dilemma i As operating costs rise each year, the amount available from the State Gas Tax (which has not been increased in over a decade) for corrective and preventative maintenance has drastically decreased. In FY 2001-02, the amount available for the Street System Program from that tax was $207,000. The amount set aside for pavement overlays and slurry was $130,000. This is a dramatic drop from the $500,000 to $600,000 available just a few years ago. Within a year or Updated Street Maintenance Fee Report Page 1 of 8 two, the State Gas Tax would cease to be a viable source of funding for street reconstruction, pavement overlays and slurry seals. Other City Street-related Maintenance Needs The City does have street-related maintenance requirements, other than direct maintenance of the pavement and shoulders in a typical City street. These requirements are: • Rights-of-Way Maintenance - This is the maintenance of rights-of way typically behind the sidewalk on collector streets where direct access from the individual lots is not allowed. A good example is Durham Road between Hall Boulevard and Highway 99W. The subdivisions adjacent to the road have internal streets for circulation and with limited access points to Durham Road. The homes typically face away from the street and in most cases have a wall built between the homes and Durham Road. The public right-of-way between the sidewalk and the wall has long been a maintenance problem that under current City code is the responsibility of the homeowner on the other side of the wall. However, these homeowners have double frontage and do not have direct access to the strips adjacent to Durham Road. The City has considered assuming responsibility for these strips, but the lack of funding in the State Gas Tax has not allowed inclusion of this work in the budget. However, this issue continues to arise each year during the budget formulation process. o Sidewalk Maintenance - This is maintenance and repair of sidewalks on the collector system only. It would involve replacement of sidewalk panels that pose a tripping hazard and routine maintenance of the sidewalks on an annual basis. • Street Light and Signal System Energy Consumption and Maintenance - The energy and maintenance charges for both the streetlights and the traffic signal systems are funded out of the State Gas Tax funds. Substitution of other funding sources to pay for these costs would free gas tax funds for other street-related purposes, including potentially the issuance of revenue bonds for the construction of major street improvements. The Street Maintenance Fee The Street Maintenance Fee is an alternative source of funds that can be implemented to help protect the City's investment in the street infrastructure. This is a monthly fee based on use of the transportation system, and is typically based on trip generation rates. The fee is charged to each household and business in the City. Other cities in Oregon have successfully implemented this fee and are using the proceeds in their annual street maintenance programs. i Legal Authority for Establishment i Chapter 3, Section 3.32.020 grants City Council the authority to establish, by resolution, fees and charges reasonably related to the City's cost of service. Hence, City Council has the authority to establish the Street Maintenance Fee and can initiate that fee by Council action. However, the initiative process does provide a mechanism for the public to challenge any Council action by referring that action to a vote. The Street Maintenance Fee could be subject to that initiative process. Updated Street Maintenance Fee Report Page 2 of 8 Maintenance Elements The following are the maintenance elements and target amounts to be funded through the Street Maintenance Fee: • Street Maintenance - $800,000. This amount assumes that most of the funding would be used annually for street maintenance purposes with a small reserve set aside for future reconstruction of certain streets as that reconstruction becomes necessary. • Rights-of-Way Maintenance - $270,000 • Sidewalk Maintenance - $90,000 • Street Light and Traffic Signal System Maintenance -$445,000 • Total for all four maintenance elements: $1,605,000 The Street Maintenance and Street Light and Traffic Signal System Maintenance are currently City responsibilities and are the two high priority elements for inclusion in the Street Maintenance Fee. ROW and Sidewalk Maintenance are optional elements that are not currently funded in the City's budget and could be eliminated if desired. Scope of Work for Each Element • Street Maintenance - Preventative and Corrective Maintenance of all City streets. This includes pothole patching, crack sealing, digouts, pavement overlays, slung seals, maintenance of street storm drainage facilities, and reconstruction of the street structural section. Attached as Appendix A-2 is a long-term program for annual maintenance of the City streets applying pavement overlays, thin-lift overlays, and slurry seals combined with street reconstruction as needed. This program addresses arterials, collectors, neighborhood routes, and local streets as four separate categories all requiring appropriate levels of maintenance. The arterial and collector streets handle higher volumes of traffic and typically require more attention. The neighborhood routes and local streets handle lesser volumes and would be expected to deteriorate at a slower rate. The revenue to be derived from the Street Maintenance Fee would be directed to implementation of the long-term maintenance program, and to the routine maintenance work performed by the City's street crews. • Rights-of-Way Maintenance - Maintenance of rights-of-way between the sidewalk and the right-of-way line on collector streets with limited direct access from adjacent subdivisions. • Sidewalk Maintenance - Maintenance of sidewalk on collector streets Citywide. • Street Light and Signal System Maintenance - Maintenance and power consumption of all streetlights Citywide. Maintenance and power consumption on all traffic signal systems and crosswalk lighting systems under City jurisdiction. Updated Street Maintenance Fee Report Page 3 of 8 Methodology for Establishing User Fees The methodology for establishing user fees for each element of work is as follow: Data Collection The first step in the study was to establish an inventory of all of the existing uses on occupied parcels in the City. Basic uses include single-family detached residential, multi-family residential and non-residential. The single-family detached and multi-family dwelling unit inventories were obtained from utility billing data collected by the City's Finance Department. The data collection for the non-residential group was more difficult and involved the use of digitized aerial photos and site inspections. For example, where office buildings were noted, the overall footprint could easily be digitized from the aerial photo, but a site visit was necessary to determine the number of floors involved. This data may need to be fine-tuned prior to fee implementation. Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual, Sixth Edition, was used to determine trip generation values for each use. The ITE manual is the most commonly used and accepted manual for this purpose and can be consistently applied to each use. ITE trip generation values were used in the development of the Traffic Impact Fee by Washington County and have been used by various cities in the development of street maintenance fees. The City of Tualatin used the fourth generation ITE manual when they developed their street utility fee. The trip generation values are assigned in accordance with certain variables, such as gross square footage of building, number of dwelling units (DU), number of acres (AC), etc. For the non- residential uses, the most commonly used factor is "number of trips per thousand gross square feet of building per day", or "trips/KSF/day". Unfortunately, not all uses have trip generation factors given in terms of "trips/KSF/day". For instance, Congregate Care Facilities are spoken to in terms of "trips/DU/day" because for that use, the number of dwelling units is the most significant. Another example is Gasoline/Service Station, which is spoken to in terms of "trips/VFP/day", where "VFP" is the number of vehicular fueling positions. Therefore, it is not the size of any building associated with the gas station that determines the number of trips, but rather it is the number of vehicles the station can serve at any one time. Adjustments for Pass-By Trips The ITE Trip Generation manual provides rates that basically count the total volume of vehicles entering and exiting a given site. However, there are certain trips that are to destinations that are not typically primary destinations. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook dated March 2001 divides trips into two major categories: pass-by trips and non-pass-by trips. Non-pass-by trips are further broken down into primary trips and diverted linked trips. Pass-by trips, as defined by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, are trips that "are made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination without a route diversion. Pass-by trips are attracted from traffic passing the site on an adjacent street or Updated Street Maintenance Fee Report Page 4 of 8 Calculated Fees Attached are the spreadsheets (listed as Appendices B-1 through B-4) showing the groups and the amounts that each group should pay for each maintenance element. The groups and amounts are summarized in the following tables: Table 1 Summary of Fees by Maintenance Element Maintenance Land Use Category Rate/Month Element er Uni# Street Maintenance Single Family Detached $1.2639 Multi-Family $0.8756 Non-residential Group 1 0-20 trips/unit/day) $1.0341 Non-residential Group 2 < 20 - 100 trips/unit/day) $5.5315 Non-residential Group 3 <100 - 400 trips/unit/day) $26.7783 Non-residential Group 4 (Special Category) $0.3570 ROW Maintenance Single Family (Detached) $0.4266 Multi-Family $0.2955 Non-residential Group 1 0-20 trips/unit/day) $0.3490 Non-residential Group 2 < 20 - 100 trips/unit/day) $1.8669 Non-residential Group 3 <100 - 400 trips/unit/day) $9.0377 Non-residential Group 4 (Special Category) $0.1205 Sidewalk Maintenance Single Family (Detached) $0.1422 Multi-Family $0.0985 Non-residential Group 2 0-20 trips/unit/day) $0.1163 Non-residential Group 2 < 20 - 100 trips/unit/day) $0.6223 Non-residential Group 3 <100 - 400 trips/unit/day) $3.0126 Non-residential Group 4 (Special Category) $0.0402 > Street Light and Signal System Maintenance Single Family (Detached) $0.7031 Multi-Family $0.4871 Non-residential Group 1 0-20 trips/unit/day) $0.5752 Non-residential Group 2 < 20 - 100 trips/unit/day) $3.0769 Non-residential Group 3 <100 - 400 trips/unit/day) $14.8954 Non-residential Group 4 (Special Category) $0.1986 Updated Street Maintenance Fee Report Page 6 of 8 Table 2 Summary of Fees for All Maintenance Elements Land Use Street ROW Sidewalk Street Light Total Category Maint. Maint. Maint. and Signal Monthly System Charge per Maint. Unit Single $1.2639 $0.4266 $0.1422 $0.7031 $2.5357 Family Multi- $0.8756 $0.2955 $0.0985 $0.4871 $1.7567 Family Group 1 $1.0341 $0.3490 $0.1163 $0.5752 $2.0746 Grou 2 $5.5315 $1.8669 $0.6223 $3.0769 $11.0976 Group 3 $26.7783 $9.0377 $3.0126 $14.8954 $53.7239 Group 4 $0.3570 $0.1205 $0.0402 $0.1986 $0.7162 The single family and multi-family groups individually pay relatively low monthly rates. Those rates are $2.54 for single family dwellings and $1.76 each for multi-family dwelling units. These are well within the range charged by other cities. For example, fees in Tualatin are now $2.92 for single family dwelling units and $5.12 for the same units in Ashland. The fee in Tigard would be lower than either city and should not create opposition among single family and multi-family residents, assuming an effective information campaign is undertaken to explain the reasons for initiation of the fees. Appendix C shows the Summary of Rates in greater detail. Appendix D discusses the adjustments for pass-by trips in detail. Conclusion The State Gas Tax is no longer a viable source of funds for anything beyond routine maintenance involving pothole patching and crack sealing. Pavement overlays and reconstruction must be funded through other means. The Street Maintenance Fee appears to be a feasible source of funds for maintenance of the street network, including the street structural section, rights-of-way and sidewalks on collectors, and the street light and traffic signal systems. The fees based on net trip ? generation rates are relatively low for single family and multi-family dwellings. Fees for various i businesses are higher, but are commensurate with the number of trips generated by those businesses. i The Street Maintenance Fee has been successfully implemented in other jurisdictions and could easily be justified for speedy implementation. The Street Maintenance Fee should be established as soon as possible so that the maintenance backlog on the City streets could be addressed in a comprehensive and effective manner. The target amount for each of the maintenance elements is adequate as of calendar year 2002. The target amounts for the elements should be reviewed periodically and compared with the actual revenues received and against the rate of inflation and increases in costs. Hence, the Street Updated Street Maintenance Fee Report Page 7 of 8 Maintenance Fee should be reviewed after the first full year of implementation, and at least every three to five years after that. Decisions can be made at those reviews on the need, if any, to increase the fees to attain expected revenues, or to keep pace with the effects of inflation. Appendices Appendix A-1 - City of Tigard Street Maintenance Needs Appendix A-2 - Long-Term Program for Annual Street Maintenance Appendix B-1 - Street Maintenance Element Appendix B-2 - ROW Maintenance Element Appendix B-3 - Sidewalk Maintenance Element Appendix B-4 - Street Light Maintenance Element Appendix C - Summary of Rates Appendix D - Adjustments for Pass-by Trips I:\F.ng\Gus\Street Maintenance Fee\Updated Street Maintenance Fee Report.doc L r 1 f I I I Updated Street Maintenance Fee Report Page 8 of 8 City of Tigard Street Maintenance Backlog* Maintenance Category Total Cost Street Reconstruction $590,000 Pavement Overlay $470,000 Slurry Seals 1,010,000 TOTAL COSTS $2,070,000 *Based on road ratings performed in 1999 Appendix A-1 Long-Term Program for Annual Street Maintenance Database The street list for this long-term program was obtained from a database consisting of all the streets in the City of Tigard. The database was created in 1999 by CHEC Consultants. CHEC inspected each street in the City and assigned ratings based on pavement surface conditions. The Pavement Management Software provided by CHEC Consultants accesses the database and provides recommendations for preventative and corrective maintenance on those streets. A street is typically divided into segments with similar cross-sections. Changes in the street cross-sections would result in different segments within the same street throughout its entire length. The most common rating used is the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), which assigns a rating from 0 to 100 for each street segment. The higher the number the better the condition of the street. Thus, a newly resurfaced street will have a PCI rating of 100. Although this rating is only one of the factors that are used in determining condition of the street, it is used (for purposes of the study) to provide the basis for a long-term program of preventative and corrective maintenance. Classifications The streets are classified into four categories: arterial, collectors, neighborhood routes and local streets. To determine the future conditions of the streets, the following deterioration rates are used: Arterials and Collectors = 2 PCI/year, Neighborhood Routes and Local Streets = I PCI/yr. The base year for the PCI rating is 1999. Street Area The cost of resurfacing is based on the surface area of the street. The surface area of the street is determined by the product of the street project length and the average width of the street. Maintenance Options The four maintenance options being considered in rehabilitating the streets are: Slung Seal, Thin Overlay, Overlay and Reconstruction. The determination of maintenance option for each street depends on the updated PCI rating of the street and is shown as follows: ® PCI < 20 requires Reconstruction • 20 < PCI<59 requires Overlay • PCI>59 on arterials and collectors requires Thin Overlay • PCI>59 requires Slurry Seal if the Street is categorized as Local. Pavement Life Cycle The following is the life expectancy for each of the four maintenance options: • Reconstruction = 20 years • Overlay = 15 to 18 years • Thin Overlay = 12 to IS years • Slurry Seat = 8 to 12 years Estimate Assumptions • $800,000 will be available yearly for the street maintenance. • Annual inflation rate of 3% is applied to unit cost. • The unit costs for the year 2003 are as follows: • Overlay=$1.25/s.f. Thin Overlay = $0.601s.f., Slurry =$0.21s.f. • Reconstruction in year 2011=$6,001s.f. APPENDIX A-2 Cover Page 1 Maintenance Schedule With a proposed annual amount of $800,000 for street maintenance, the objective is to rehabilitate the entire city street inventory in the shortest possible time frame. A strategic plan of careful expenditure and savings enables the entire city street inventory to be rehabilitated in 16 years (from FY 2003-04 to FY2019-20). Approximately $700,000 out of $800,000 is spent annually to maintain streets. Approximately $100,000 is reserved every year. The cumulative reserve amount would be used in future fiscal years for the reconstruction of severely damaged streets as part of the long-term plan. By FY 2019-20, each street in the entire street inventory would have received some type of maintenance treatment at least once. Due to the life expectancy of the pavements, previously overlaid streets would be revisited by FY 2018-19, thin overlay by FY 2015-16 and slurry seal by FY 2014-15 to determine the need for maintenance at that point. The entire maintenance cycle would begin again in FY 2020-21. APPENDIX A-2 Cover Page 2 APPENDIX M2 Proposed Major Maintenance Budget Forecast For= Assumptions: Base Year for Pavement Condition Index - 1999 Pavement Condition Index Depreciation (Arterials and Collwove) e 2 PCI /Yr Pavement Condition Index Depreciation (Neighborhood Routes and Local) - I PCI /Yr Pavement Condition Index Rating of 100 - Newly msudacad Street PCI < 20 -Requires complete pavement reconstruction 20 < PCI < 59 a Requires Overlay 60 <PCI < 100 RequiresThln Overlay, Requires Slurry It Local Street Unit Coate includes 3%in11.10on oral previous yeaYS rah Proposed Major Maintenance Budget Forecast FY 2003.2004 Road Name LImNa From To Classincalon 1999 PCI 2003 PCI Recomm"d Action PrLJength Width Area (s.f.) Cost 72 NO VARNS ST HUNZIKER ST Arterial 53 45 Overlay 475 40 19000 $23,750.00 DURHAM SUMMERFIE DR 113 TH AV Arterial 56 48 Orerlrv 470 40 18800 $23,500.00 72 NO PINE ST OAK ST Arterial 67 59 Thin Overlay 420 40 16800 $10.080.00 72 NO SAYLOR ST BAYLOR ST Arterial 73 65 Thin Overlay 1190 40 47600 $28.560.00 121 ST SUMMERCRE DR SUMMER ST Collector 47 39 Overlay 320 35 11200 $14,000.00 121 ST SUMMER ST BURLHEIGH DR Collector 58 50 Oveday 275 35 9625 532.031.25 121 ST CHANDLER DR GAARDE ST Collector 100 92 Thin Overlay 410 35 14350 $17,937.50 BONITA FANI40 CRE OR RR CROSSI Collector 62 54 Overlay 390 35 13650 $17,062.50 SCOFFINS ASH AV MAIN ST Collector 46 38 Overlay 425 35 14875 538.593.75 CASCADE SCHOLLS F RD SCROLLS F RD Collector 100 92 Thin Overlay 581 35 20335 $25.418.75 PFAFFLE 82 NO AV 81 ST AV Collector 95 87 Thin Overlay 280 35 9800 $12,250.00 NORTH DAKOTA 121 ST AV 119 TH AV Neigh'd Route 28 24 Overlay 520 30 15600 $19.500.00 79 TH CHURCHILL WY THURSTON DR NeigWd Route 53 49 Owrlrv 1080 30 32400 $40,500.00 79 TH BOND ST CHURCHILL WY NeiRh'd Route 37 33 Overlay 115 30 3450 $4.312.50 79 TH GENTLEW00 DR MARA CT Neilth'd Route 47 43 Overlay 1490 30 44700 $55,875.00 ROSS HALL 8L el ST AV NelRh'd Route 47 43 Overlay 950 30 28500 $35,625.00 NORTH DAKOTA GREENBURG RD 95 TH AV Naigh'd Route 52 48 Ovsrlay 240 30 7200 $9,000.00 NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE RD TIEDEMAN AV Neigh'd Route 82 78 Thin Overlay 1340 30 40200 550.250.00 SHADY GREENSURG RD GREENBURG RC NsIxh'd Route 68 64 Thin Overlay 1000 30 30000 537,500.00 92 NO PARKING L PARKING L Neigh 'd Route 63 59 Thin Overlay 335 30 10060 $12,562.50 132 NO 133 RD AV 133 RD AV Local 24 20 Ovaday 925 25 23125 $28,906.25 112 TH ERROL ST WALNUT ST Local 26 22 Overlay 500 25 12500 115.625.00 66TH HAMPTON ST HAMPTON ST Local 30 26 O-Iv SID 25 12750 115,937.50 67TH CLINTON ST END Local 48 44 Overlay 845 25 21125 $26.406.25 THORN/81ST CULDE•SA THORN ST Local 47 43 Overlay 106 25 2650 $3.312.50 66TH HAMPTON ST FRANKLIN ST Local 55 51 Oveday 620 25 15500 $19,375.00 Sub Total $577.871.25 Engineering AL Admin-10%. $57,787.13 OverlayCost-$1.25/a.f. Thin Overlay Cost•$0.6/s.f. Total Accumulated Reserve Total $164.341.63 Fr 20042005 Road Nam Limits From To Clasaltcaton 1999 PCI 2004 PCI Recommend Action PrLhnath Width Area (a.f.) Cost GREENBURG LINCOLN AV 98 TH AV Arterial 84 74 Thin Ovaday 2150 40 86000 $53,148.00 GREENBURG CENTER ST LINCOLN AV Arterial 88 78 Thin Overlay 800 40 32000 519.776.00 GREENBURG PACIFIC HW CENTER ST Arterial 54 44 Overlay 211 40 8440 111,528.27 72 NO OAK ST VENTURA DR Arterial 80 70 Thin Overlay 1087 40 43480 $26,970.64 DURHAM 92 NO AV HALL BL Arterial 80 70 Thin Overlay 1799 40 71960 544,471.28 DURHAM SERENA CT 92 NO AV Medal 80 70 Thin Overlay 2020 40 80800 $49.934.40 DURHAM 74 TH AV BOONESFER RD Art net 75 65 Thin Overlay 450 40 18000 $11.124.00 DURHAM 113 TH AV SERENA CT Arterial 80 70 Thin Owday 2510 40 100400 $62.047.20 BURHAMM ASH AV ASH AV Collector 36 26 Overlay 760 35 26600 $34,247.50 BURNHAM HALL BIL ASH AV Collector 35 25 Overlay 1205 35 42175 254,300.31 TIEDEMAN WALNUT ST CITY LIMI Collector 31 21 Owrlay 210 35 7350 $9,463.13 TIEDEMAN CITY LIMI CITY LIMI Collector 42 32 Overlay 290 35 10150 $13.068.13 121 ST BURLHEIGH DR NORTH OAK ST Collector 100 90 Thin Overlay 245 35 8575 $5,299.35 SCOFFINS HALL BL ASH AV Collector 80 70 Thin Orley 470 35 16450 530,166.30 VENTURA VENTURA DR BARBARA LN NeiRh'd Route 65 60 Thin Overlay 890 30 26700 $16.500.60 130 TH CUI.DE•SA MORNINGST OF Neigh'd Route 66 61 Thin Ovedw 630 30 18300 $11,309.40 SUMMERFIELD DURHAM RD 114 TH CT NeiRh'd Route 72 67 Thin Overlay 1000 30 30000 $18,540.00 78 TH PFAFFLE ST SPRUCE ST NeIRted Route 75 70 Thin Overlay 280 30 8400 55.191.20 COMMERCIAL 95 TH AV 98 TH AV Ni$th'd Route 80 75 Thin Ova lay 250 30 7500 $4.635.00 LOCUST GREENBURG RD 92 NO AV N:IitWd Route 82 77 Thin Overlay 1070 30 32100 $19.837.80 MURDOCK 98 TH AV 97 TH AV Nalgh'd Route 82 77 Thin Overlay 300 30 9000 $5.562.00 SENCHVIEW ALPINE VI CT BRIM PL Neigh'd Route 82 77 Thin Oveday 2495 30 74850 $46,257.30 GARDEN GARL_N PL GARDEN PL Local 58 53 Overlay 850 25 21250 $27,359.38 69 TH DARTMOUTH ST CLINTON ST Local 52 47 Overlay 305 25 7625 $9.817.19 SANDBURG 72 NO AV CUL•DE-SA Local 53 48 Owrlav 935 25 23375 $30,095.31 113 TH END END Local 53 48 Overlay 730 25 18250 '23.496.88 ASH COMMERCIA ST SCOFFINS ST Local 55 500verw 415 25 10375 $13.357.81 Sub Total $637.404.16 EnRinoering I Admin,109e, $63.740.42 Overlay Cost-111,2875/ f. Thin Orerlay.$0.618/s.l. Total Accumulated Reserve Total $263.197.04 FY 2005.2006 Read Name Limits Frain To C14.01caton 1999 PCI 2005 PCI Recommend Action PrLlength Width A.& (s.f.) Cost 72 NO FIR ST VARNS ST Arterial 80 68 Thin Oved v 360 40 14400 $9.166.18 72 NO SAYLOR ST VILLA RID WY Arterial 82 70 Thin Overlay 150 40 6000 $3,819.24 WALNUT BARROWS(RD SHOPPING Arterial 82 70 Thin Overlay 260 40 10400 $6,620.02 WALNUT SHOPPING NORTHVIEW OR Arterial 82 70 Thin Overlay 230 40 9200 55,856.17 WALNUT NORTHVIEW DR 135 TH AV Arterial 84 72 Thin Overlay 1610 40 64400 $40.993.18 WALNUT 135 TH AV 132 NO AV Arterial 90 78 Thin Overlay 1475 40 59000 $37,555.86 WALNUT 132 NO AV 128 TH AV Arterial 90 78 Thin Overlay 950 40 38000 $24.188.52 PFAFFLE 83 RD" 82 NO AV Collector 82 70 Thin Owrlrv 220 35 7700 $4,901.36 68 TH 66 TH AV HAMPTON ST Collector 54 72 Thin Overlay 895 35 31325 $19.939.62 68 TH HAMPTON ST 66 TH AV collector 84 72 Thin Overlay 895 35 31325 $19,939.62 SONATA RR CROSSI 72 NO AV Collector 84 72 Thin Overlay 620 35 28700 $18,268.70 MAIN PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HIV Collector 84 72 Thin Overlay 285 35 9975 56,349.49 121 ST MERESTONE CT SUMMERCRE DI Collector 84 72 Thin Overlay 300 35 30500 $6,683.67 WALNUT ASCENSION DR END Collector 82 70 Thin Overlay 210 35 7350 $4,678.57 OAK GREENSURG RD 95 TH AV Collector 84 72 Thin Overlay 1085 35 37975 $24.172.61 CASCADE GREENBURG RD SCHOLLS F RD Collector 95 83 Thin Overlay 775 35 27125 $17,266.15 CASCADE SCHOLLS F RD SCROLLS F RD Collector 100 88 Thin Overlay 634 35 22190 $34.124.82 90 TH GREENBURG RD NORTH DAK ST N41Ah'd Route 85 79 Thin Ovadrv 1610 30 48300 $30,744.88 SPRINGW'OOD COTTONWOO LN IRONWOOD LP N41gh'd Route 64 58 Overlay 510 30 14300 $20.289.71 NORTH DAKOTA GREENSURG RD GREENBURG RC Nefit d Route 55 49 Overlay 683 30 20490 $27.172.30 98 TH SATTLER ST MURDOCK ST =Ah'd Route 64 58 Overlay 1100 30 33000 $43,762.13 HILLSHIRE CUL•DE•SA BLUE GUM CT N4fRh'd Route 84 78 Thin Overlay 3175 30 95250 $60,630.44 CANTERBURY PACIFIC HW 109 TH AV Nelith'd Route 84 78 Thin Overlay 785 30 23550 $14,990.52 98TH COMMERCIA ST LONDON CT NeiRh'd Route 82 76 Thin Overlay 240 30 7200 $4,583.09 FREWING ASH AV PACIFIC HW NelAh'd Route 68 62 Thin Oveday 1430 30 42900 $27,307.57 91ST PINEBROOK ST CUL•DE.SA N4igh'd Route 81 75 Thin Oveday 420 30 12600 $8,020.40 93 RD INEZ ST MCDONALD ST N4igh'd Route 95 89 Thin Overlay 1300 30 39000 $24,825.06 NIMBUS CUL•DE•SA SCROLLS FRD Local 55 49 Overlay 1300 25 32500 $43.099.06 APPENDIX A3 Pre AM2.1 A-wlwiLl I y 0 f KIP N 1.1 N H =2 ntlY$ wP ss pis a3 CC1C a 3 L N q y~ p _ N O V P O k 3311 YZYZ mNu 3 ~uo~ a _ A ~ Y Cuwuu H r Nosi L S ~>!OQ ~D ONi V~OeV pUV•'V ~AUSyu FY 20062007 Road Name Limits From To Clnslncaton 1999 PCI 2006 PCI Recommend Action PrLIonIM Width Area 01) Cost 72 NO HAMPTON ST DARTMOUTH S7 Art III 100 86 Thin Overlay 2000 40 80000 $52,450.90 72 NO CLINTON ST BAYLOR ST Arterl: 100 86 Thin Overlay 610 40 24,1100 $13,997.52 72 NO DARTMOUTH ST CLINTON ST Art erial 86 72 Thin Overlay 465 40 18600 $12,194.83 72 NO SPRUCE ST PINE ST Arterial 82 68 Thin Overlay 360 40 14400 $9.411.16 72 NO OAK ST OAK ST Arterial 93 79 Thin Overlay 321 40 12840 $8,418.37 72 NO CITY LIMI REDWOOD LN Arterial 100 86 Thin Oyeday 5458 40 218320 $143.138.50 72 ND REDWOOD LN BONITA RD Artedal 100 86 Thin Overlay 1973 40 78920 $51,742.81 MAIN FANNO CRE BR SCOFFINS ST Collector 82 68 In Overlay 1795 35 62825 $41,!90.34 PFAFFLE 81 STAY PACIFIC HW Collector 82 68 Thin Onrlay 1130 35 39550 $25,930.41 MCDONALD 93 RD AV HALL BL Collactor 80 66 Thin Overlay 1830 35 64050 $41.993.50 68 TH 66 TH AV 66 TH AV Collector 100 86 Thin Overlay 630 35 22050 $14,456.78 69 TH PACIFIC HW PINE ST Collector 100 86 Thin Overlay 320 35 11200 $7.343.13 BONITA HALL BL 79 TH AV Collector 1D0 86 Thin Cveray 1515 35 53025 $34,765.11 SONATA 72 NO AV INTERSTAT HW Collector 100 86 Thin Overlay 1170 35 40950 $26,848.30 SONATA INTERSTAT HW 72 NO AV Collector 100 86 Thin Overlay 1170 35 40950 $26,848.30 WALNUT PACIFIC HV/ PACIFIC HW NaiAh'd Route 70 63 Thin Overlay 245 30 7350 $4.818.93 ASH COWLES CT GARRETT ST Neiph'd Route 74 67 Thin Overlay 205 30 6150 $4,032.16 BENCHVIEW BULL MOUN RD ALPINE VI N.IRh'd Rout. 82 75 Thin Overlev 695 30 20850 $13.670.01 95 TH END OAK ST Lou: 61 54 0.A4V 285 25 7125 $9,732.10 66 TH END 68 TH PW Local 62 55 Overlay 455 25 11375 $15,537.21 fib TH 68 TH PW HAMPTON ST Local 62 55 Overlay 1045 25 26125 $35,684.37 FERN CITY LIMI 138 TH AV Leal 77 70 Slurry 355 25 8875 $1.939.59 LOMITA 90 TH AV CUL•DE-SA Local 62 55 Overlay 575 25 14375 519,634.94 SPRUCE 89 TH AV HALL BL Lou; 62 55 Overlay 720 25 18000 $24.586.36 Sub Total $642,395.63 EnRinaerinR 6 Admin-30%. 564. 239.56 Overlay Cost•$1.3654.f. , Thin Onrlay.$0.655/s.f. Slurry Cost-50.218/11 Total Accumulated Reserve Total $442,093.82 FY 2007.2008 Read Name Limits From To Claselfkaton 1999 PCI 2007 PCI Recommend Action PILIanAth Width Ana (s.l.) Cost 72ND BONITA RD SANDBURG ST Art erial 100 84 Thin Ove11 2595 40 103800 $70,096.69 72 NO SAN08URG ST FIRST Artarlal 100 Be Thin Overlay 680 40 27200 418,368.30 72 NO HUNZIKER ST HAMPTON ST Arterial 100 84 Thin Overlay 325 40 13000 $8,778.97 DURHAM PACIFIC HW SUMMERFIE DR Arterial 95 79 Thin Over lay 560 40 22400 $15,126.84 DURHAM HALL BL 79 TH AV Arterial 100 84 Thin 00 11 1695 40 67800 $45,785.70 DURHAM 79 TH AV 74 TH AV Arterial 100 84 Thin Overln 1165 40 46600 $31,469.23 PFAFFLE HALL BL HALL BL Collector 70 54 Overlay 215 35 7525 510,586.82 121 ST NORTH OAK ST MANZANITA CT C. led., 70 54 Overlay 970 35 33950 $47.763.78 BONITA 79 TH AV MILTON CT Collector 85 69 Thin Overlay 1170 35 40950 $27,653.75 TIEDEMAN CITY LIMI 106 TH AV Collector 77 61 Thin Overlay 225 35 7875 $5,318.03 BURNHAM ASH AV MAIN ST Collector 86 70 Thin Overlay 150 35 5250 $3.545.35 CASCADE GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RC Collector 80 64 Thin Overlay 880 35 30800 $20,79940 WALNUT GRANT AV CACIFIC HW Collector 80 64 Thin Overlay 475 35 16625 $11,226.95 MISTLETOE HILLSHIRE OR SENCHVIEW CT N.IRh'd Routs 82 74 Thin Ova It 360 30 10800 $7,293.30 SATTLER 100 TH AV 98 TH AV NeiRh'd Route 82 74 Thin Overlay 475 30 14250 $9.623.10 115 TH GENESIS LP CITY LIMI NaiRh'd Route 82 74 Thin Overlay 480 30 14400 $9,724.40 WINTERLAKE SHORE DR WINTERLAK CT NsiRh'd Route 83 75 Thin Overlay 1000 30 30000 $20,259.16 108 TH TITAN LN DURHAM RD NaiRh'd Route 78 70 Thin O"I"Y 880 30 26400 $17,828.06 98 TH DURHAM RD SUMMERFIE DR Neiph'd Route 77 69 Thin Overlay 1160 30 34800 523.500.62 95 TH GREENSURG RD SHADY UN NeiRh'd Route 90 82 Thin Overlay 1810 30 54300 $36,669.08 97 TH MURDOCK ST MCDONALD ST N.lah'd Route 90 82 Thin Overay 1%8 30 59040 $39.870.02 98 TH SUMMERFIE DR SATTLER ST Nelend Route 87 79 Thin Overlay 1060 30 31800 521,474.71 98 TH LONDON CT GREENBURG RC NeiRh'd Route 100 92 Thin Overlay 1045 30 31350 $21.170.82 ANN 124 TH AV CUL-DE-SA Local 63 55 Overlay 535 25 13375 $18,817.10 LANDAU 77 TH AV 72 NO AV Local 74 66 Slurry 1267 25 31675 $7,130.10 TIGARD 116 TH AV 115 TH AV Local 66 58 Overlay 264 25 6600 $9.285.45 ELMHURST 72NDAV 70 TH AV Local 67 59 Slurry 515 25 12875 $2.898.19 126TH KAREN ST CUL.DE SA Local 68 60 Sturry 375 25 9375 $2.110.33 KATHERINE 131 ST AV 128TH AV Lou: 70 62 Slurry 590 25 14750 $3,320.25 105 TH CUL-OE-SA MCDONALD ST Local 71 63 Slurry 390 25 9750 $2.194.74 KATHERINE KAROL CT KAROL CT Local 72 64 Slurry 317 25 7925 $1.783.93 COLONY CREEK CUL'DE-SA CUL.DE•SA Local 80 72 Slurry 850 25 21250 $4,783.41 133 RD 132 NO AV BULL MOUN RD Local 53 45 Overlay 1625 25 40625 $57,154.74 Sub Total $633.411.32 EnRlneerinR & Admin-30%. $63,341.13 Ovedwy Cost.$1.406/s.f. , Thin Overlay$0.675/s.1. Slurry Cost.$0.225/s.L Total Accumulated Reserve Total $545341.37 FY 20062009 Road Name Limits From To Classincaton 1999 PCI 2008 PCI Recommend Action PrLlenRth Width Area (s.fd Cost DURHAM SUMMERFIE LN SUMMERFIE LN Arterial 100 82 Thin Overlay 560 40 22400 $15,580.64 WALNUT 139 TH AV 135 TH AV Arterial 100 82 Thin Overlay 880 40 35200 $24,483.87 WALNUT 69 TH AV 69 TH AV Collector 76 58 Thin Overlay 395 35 13825 $9,616.18 121 ST ROSE VIST OR HOWARD DR Collector 81 63 Thin Overlay 1170 35 40950 $28,483.36 69TH PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Collector 82 64 Thin Dyad" 140 35 4900 $3,408.27 OAK 87 TH AV HALL BL Collector 100 82 Thin Overlay 220 35 7700 $5,355.85 135 TH WALNUT ST SCROLLS F RD Collector 100 82 Thin Overlay 3787 35 132545 $92.193.59 SCOFFINS ASH AV ASH AV Collector 100 82 Thin Overlay 155 35 5425 $3.773.44 HAMPTON 68 TH PV/ 66 TH AV Collector 82 64 Thin Overlay 305 35 10675 $7.425.15 HAMPTON 66 TH AV 66 TH AV Collector 82 64 Thin Overlay 225 35 7875 $5,477.57 OAK 72 ND AV 71 ST AV Collector 82 64 Thin Overlay 460 35 16100 $11,198.59 CASCADE GREENBURG RD GREENSURG RC Collector 95 77 Than Cveday 2490 35 87150 $60,618.44 CASCADE SCROLLS F RD SCROLLS F RD Collector 82 64 Thin Overlay 581 35 20335 $14,144.30 HAMPTON 70 TH AV 68 TH PW Collector 90 72 Thin Overlay 535 35 18725 $13,024.44 HUNZIKER HALL 81. 72 NO AV Collector 94 76 Thin Overiay, 3855 35 134925 $93,549.03 ASCENSION MISTLETOE DR WALNUT UN NeiRWd Route 82 73 Thin Overlay 4180 30 125400 $87,223.78 MISTLETOE ASCENSION DR ESSEX DR NeIRh'd Route 82 73 Thin Overlay 255 30 7650 $5,321.07 MISTLETOE ASCENSION DR HILLSHIRE DR NsiRh'd Route 82 73 Thin Overlay 1615 30 48450 $33,700.10 MISTLETOE BENCHVIEW CT ALPINE Hei9h'd Route P.2 73 Thin Overlay 1065 30 31950 $22,223.28 OAK 71 STAV 69 TH AV NIIRh'd Route 82 73 Thin Overlay 635 30 19050 $13,250.50 OMARA HILL ST CHELSEA LP N.IRwd Route 76 67 Thin Overlay 615 30 18450 $12,833.16 PARK WATKINS AV GRANT AV N.IRh'd Route 76 67 Thin Overlay 695 30 20850 $14,502.52 WATKINS WATKINS PL WALNUT ST Nefah'd Route 77 68 Thin Overlay 1185 30 35550 $24,727.32 NORTH DAKOTA SPRINGWOO DR ANTON DR NeiRh'd Route 78 69 Thin Overlay 530 30 15900 $11,059.47 PARK DERRY DEL CT WATKINS AV Local 76 67 Slurry 1250 25 31250 $7,245.46 76 TH END BONITA RD Local 73 64 Slurry 200 25 5000 $1,159.27 CLINTON 69 TH AV 68 TH AV local 73 64 Slurry 260 25 6500 $1,507.06 FERN CITY LIMI 135 TH AV Local 73 64 Slurry 125 25 3125 $724.55 121 ST GAARDE ST ROSE VIST DR Local 77 68 Slurry 520 2S 13000 $3.014.11 79TH PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Local 74 65 Slurry 211 25 5275 $1,223.03 79 TH PACIFIC HW PACIFIC MIN Local 74 65 Slurry 317 25 7925 $1,837.45 87 TH MCDONALD ST CUL•DE-SA Local 74 65 Slurry 525 2S 13125 $3,043.09 DERRY DELL PARK ST WATKINS AV Local 74 65 Slurry 495 25 12375 $2.869.20 114 TH CUL.DE-SA TIGARD ST Local 74 65 Slurry 580 25 14500 $3,361.89 136 TH CUL•DE•SA WALNUT UN Local 74 65 Slurry 205 25 5125 $1,188.26 PARK GRANTAV PACIFIC NW Local 78 69 Slurry 175 25 4375 $1,014.36 MAN7ANITA 119 TH AV 115 TH AV Local 75 fib Slurry 840 25 21000 $4,868 95 126 TH BULL MOUN RD END Local 66 57 O"day 440 25 11000 $15,940.02 JULIA CUL•DE•SA 93 RD AV Local 80 71 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2,318.55 APPENDIX A-2 Pap A-2.3 LEHMAN GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RC Local 80 71 Slur, 255 25 6375 $1.478.07 MARTHA COPPER CR DR 93 RD AV Local 80 71 Slur, 430 25 10750 ;2,492.44 MILLEN 93 RD AV 92 NO AV Local 80 71 Slurry 396 25 9875 $2.289.57 113TH CUL-DE•SA CU4DE•SA Local 80 71 Slurry 320 25 8000 ;1,854.84 123 RD CUL•DE-SA KATHERINE ST Local 80 71 Slurry 430 25 30750 ;2,492.44 SERENA WOODCREST AV PICKS CT Local 82 73 Slurry 1105 25 27625 $6.404.99 93RD CUL•OE.SA MARTHA ST Local 82 73 Slurry 1400 25 35000 $8,114.92 MILLEN COPPER CR OR MILLEN/94 CT Local 84 75 Slurry 520 25 13000 $3,014.11 CARDINAL SEQUOIAP CUL•DE-SA Lou: 84 75 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2.318.55 BOXELDER HILLSHIRE DR MINT PL Local 82 73 Slurry 265 25 6625 ;1,536.04 IRONWOOD SPRINGWOO OR SPRINGWOO DR Local 82 73 Slurry 2270 25 56750 $13,157.76 RIVERWOOD RIVERWOOD PL END Local 82 73 Slur, 1825 25 45625 $10,578.38 $ub Total $720,521.30 EnRineerinR & Admin-10%. $72.052.13 Overly Cost.;1.449/31 , Thin Overtar"S0.695/s.l. Slurry Cosl•SO.231/s.l. Total , Accumulated Re- Total $552,767.94 FY 2009.2010 Read Name Limits From To Classl0atm 1999 PCI 2009 PCI Recommend Action PrLlemilh Width Area (41) Cost LOCUST 92 ND AV HALL BL Collector 90 70 Thin Overlay 1561 35 54635 ;39,14223 MAIN SCOFFINS ST PACIFIC HW Collector 85 65 Thin Overlay 550 35 19250 $13,791.30 MCDONALD 105 TH AV 93 RD AV Collector 94 74 Thin Overlay 3296 35 115360 ;82.647.52 OAK 95 TH AV 90TH AV Collector 91 71 Thin Overlay 430 35 15050 $10.78229 PFAFFLE HALL BL 83 RD AV Collector 100 80 Thin Overlay 660 35 23100 $16,549.56 WALNUT TIEDEMAN AV FONNERST Collector 90 70 Thin O-I v 211 35 7385 $5,290.85 WALNUT FONNER ST ID6 TH AV Collector 90 70 Thin Overlay 370 35 12950 $9,277.79 121 ST JAMES ST FONNER ST Collector 85 65 Thfn Overlay 330 35 13550 $8,274.78 121 ST WALNUT ST ANN ST Collector 90 70 Thin Overlay 464 35 16240 $11.634.85 121 ST ANN ST MERESTONE C7 Collector 90 70 Thin Ownay 1565 35 54775 $39,242.53 FALCON RISE MORNING H OR MORNING H DR NeiRh'd Route 86 76 Thin Oveney 730 30 21900 ;15,689.85 KABLE 100 TH AV 100 TH AV NURh'd Route 84 74 Thin Overlay 330 30 9900 $7,092.67 TIGARD TIEDEMAN AV TIEDEMAN AV NeiRh'd Route 86 76 Thin Overlay 170 30 5100 $3,653.80 SATTLER 92 NO AV 91 ST AV N.Igh'd Route 92 82 Thin Overlay 130 30 3900 $2.794.08 79TH CHURCHILL WY CHURCHILL WY NaiRh'd Route 67 57 Overlay 145 30 4350 $6,492.66 79TH THURSTON DR GENTLEWOO OF NeiRh'd Route 82 72 Thin Overlay 535 30 16050 $11,498.72 92 NO PARKING L DURHAM RD N.IRh'd Rout. 91 81 Thin Overlay 2402 30 72060 SSI.626.05 JOHNSON GRANT AV PACIFIC HW NIiRh'd Route 67 570veday 710 30 21300 $31,791.64 NORTH DAKOTA ANTON DR 121 ST AV N.iRh'd Route 85 75 Thin O clay 1525 30 45750 $32.776.74 PINEBROOK 92 NO AV HALL BL N.Igh'd Route 83 73 Thin Over 1835 30 55050 $39,439.55 SPRINGWOOD 121 ST AV COTTONWOO L! Ne1Rh, Route 82 72 Thin Overlay 1430 30 42900 $30.734.91 SUMMERFIELD DURHAM RD DURHAM RD N.iRh'd Route 68 58 Overlay 290 30 8700 ;12,985.32 SUMMERCREST TIGARD DR CUL•DE•SA Lou: 77 67 Slum 1885 25 47125 $11,253.94 107TH CUL.DE•SA 307 TH CT Local 75 65 Slurry 106 25 2550 $632.85 MORNINGSTAR WOODSHIRE LN CUL•DE-SA Local 82 72 Slurry 1675 25 41875 $10,000.19 MANZANITA 121 ST AV CUL'DE•SA Local 77 67 Slurry 264 25 6600 $1,576.15 MERESTONE CUL.DE•SA 121 ST AV Local 77 67 Slurry 435 25 10875 32.597.06 MURDOCK 106 TH AV END Local 77 67 Slurry 160 25 4000 $955.24 SERENA PICKS CT GRIMSON CT Loca l 77 67 Slurry 680 25 17000 $4,059.78 STEVEN CUL•DE•SA CRESMER DR Lou: 77 67 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1,373.16 SUMMERCREST CUL.DE-SA SUMMERCRE DI Local 77 67 Slurry 310 25 7750 $1,850.78 71ST PINE ST OAK ST Local 82 72 Slum 415 25 10375 $2,477.66 COTTONWOOD 115 TH AV SPRINGWOO DR Local 83 73 Slurry 2445 25 61125 $14,597,29 71 ST PACIFIC HW SPRUCE ST Local 82 72 Slurry 450 25 11250 $2,686.62 71 ST SPRUCE ST PINE ST Local 82 72 Slurry 415 25 10375 32,477,66 71 ST OAK ST MAPLELEPF ST Local 82 72 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2.388.10 76 TH END SPRUCE ST Local 82 72 Slurry 250 25 6250 $1,492.57 86 TH INEZ ST GREENSWAR LN Local 82 72 Slurry 430 25 10750 $2,567,21 87TH INEZ ST CUL.DE-SA Local 82 72 Slum 280 25 7000 $1,671.67 92 ND GREENBURG RD END Local 82 72 Slum 970 25 24250 $5.791.15 93 RD NORTH OAK ST END Local 82 72 Slum 380 25 9500 42,268,70 ALPINE VIEW BENCHV:EW TR MISTLETOE. DR Local 82 72 Slum 665 25 16625 $3,970.22 ALPINE VIEW CUL.DE-SA BENCHVIEW TR Local 82 72 Slurry 300 ZS 7500 $2,79108 ASHFORD 76 TH AV CUL•DE•SA Local 82 72 Slurry 1045 25 26125 $6.238,92 BENISH WALNUT ST MORNING H OR Local 82 72 Slur, 840 25 21000 $5.015.02 BEREA CRESMER DR GARRETT ST Local 82 72 Slum 430 25 10750 $2,567,21 BRIM CUL.DE-SA BENCHVIEW TR Local 82 72 Slurry 695 25 17375 $4,149,33 BROADMOOR END WHITEHALL LN Local 82 72 Slum 305 25 7625 $1.820.93 CLINTON 67 TH AV END Local 82 72 Slum 130 25 3250 $776.13 COOK 307 TH AV WATKU:S AV Local 82 72 Slurry 495 25 12375 $2.955,28 Sub Total $585,211.60 EnRineerinR & Admin•30%. $58,521.16 Overlay C.0-ill.492/s.L, Thin O.A."30.716/.J. Slum Cost -$$238/s.l. Total ,4ccumulat.d Reserve Total $709,035.18 FY 2010.2011 Read Name Limits From To CI...Ill ton 1999 PCI 2010 PCI Recommend Action PrLlensith Width Area (51) Cost 68 TH HAINES RD PACIFIC HW Collector 76 54 Overlay 1930 35 67550 $103,847,47 DARTMOUTH PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Collector 76 54 Overlay 220 35 7700 $11,837.54 FONNER ERROL ST WALNUT ST Collector 71 49 Overlay 330 35 11550 $17,75630 MAIN PACIFIC HW FANNO CREBR Collector 76 64 Overlay 305 35 10675 $16,411,13 68 TH ELMHURST ST HAINES RD Collector 94 72 Thin Overlay 2275 35 79625 $58.757.22 121ST SPRINGWOO OR SCROLLS F RD Collector 100 78 Thin O.sy 750 35 26250 $19.370.51 HAMPTON 68 TH PW 68 TH PW Collector 100 78 Thin Overlay 22S 35 7875 $5,811.15 HOWARD 121 ST AV END Collector 100 78 Thin Overlay 1735 35 60725 $44,810.45 DARTMOUTH PACIFIC HW 69 TH AV C.: ad" 100 78 Thin Overlay 2975 35 104125 $76,836.37 100 TH KABLE ST KABLE ST NeiRh'd Routs 70 59 Thin Overlay 429 30 12870 $9,497.09 68TH HAMPTON ST ELMHURST ST N.IRh'd Route 93 82 Thin Overlay 1552 30 46560 $34.357.76 74TH END SPRUCE ST NeIRh'd Route 78 67 Thin Overhv 590 30 17700 $13.061.26 74 TH BARBARA LN TAYLORS F RD NaiRh'd Rout: 90 79 Thin Overlay 1490 30 44700 $32,985.22 78TH PFAFFLE ST PFAFFLE ST N:IRh'd Route 90 79 Thin Overlay 119$ 30 35850 ;26,454.59 79 TH DURHAM RD BOND ST Net-d Route 95 84 Thin Overlay 545 30 16350 $12,065.06 79 TH MARA CT BONITA RD N:I,h'd Routs 85 74 Thin Overlay 100 30 3000 $2,213.77 87TH PACIFIC HW CENTER ST Local 78 67 Slum 250 25 6250 $1,537.34 89TH END END Local 78 67 Slum 445 25 11125 $2,736.47 OLD ORCHARD SUMMERFIE OR SUMMERFIE DR Local 78 67 Slum 330 25 8250 $2,029.29 SERENA SERENA Wy DURHAM RD Local 82 71 Slurry 230 25 5250 $1,291.37 EDGEWOOD OMARA ST OMARA ST Local 84 73 Slum 2670 25 66750 ;16.41812 76 TH VARNS ST CRESTVIEW ST Local 80 69 Slurry 330 25 8250 $2.029.29 91 ST GREEN13URG RD CUI.DE•SA Local 80 69 Slurry 725 25 38125 ;4,458.29 CORYLUS CUL.DE•SA HAZELTREE TR Loral 80 69 Slum 372 25 9300 ;2,287.57 GARDEN PARK 110 TH AV 110 TH AV Local 80 69 Slum 1115 25 27875 $6,856.55 FAIRVIEW FAIRVIEW CT CUL.DE'SA Local 82 71 Slum 560 25 14000 $3,443.65 FANNO CREEK FANNO CRE CT FANNO CRE DR Local 82 71 Slum 550 25 13750 ;3,382.15 GARRETT ASH AV CRESMER DR Loral 82 71 $:um 690 25 17250 $4,243.06 GENTLEWOODS ASHFORD ST ASHFORD ST Local 82 71 Slum 150 25 3750 $922.41 GREENLEAF GREENS WY CUL-DE-SA Local 82 71 Slum 264 25 6600 $1,623.43 GREENFIELD RIDGEFIEL LN BENCHVIEW TR Local 82 71 Slum 765 25 19125 $4,704.27 KENT CUL•DE•SA GREENLAND DR Loca l 82 71 Slurry 440 25 11000 ;2,705.72 LEAH END END Local 82 71 Slum 585 25 14625 $3,597.38 LIDEN WILTON AV MARCIA DR Local 82 71 Slurry 905 25 22625 $5.565.18 LUKAR ASCENSION DR END Local 82 71 Slurry 195 25 4875 1,199.13 MILLEN/94TH MILLEN OR MILLEN OR Local 82 71 Slum 240 25 6000 ;1.475.85 APPENDIX A-2 Page A,2-4 MURDOCK 103 RD AV 987H AV Local 82 71 Slurry 1470 25 36750 $9,039.57 NORTHVILW 140 TH TE MARCIA OR Local 82 71 Slurry 460 25 11500 32,828.71 OAKTREE ALOERBROO CR ALDERBROO DR Local 82 71 Slurry 810 25 20250 $4,98099 OXALIS ASCENSION DR END foul 82 71 Slurry 180 25 4500 $1,10669 PATHFINDER 107 TH CT CUL'DE•SA Lout 82 71 Slurry 340 25 8625 $2.121.53 RACELY LEAH TE CUL-OE•SA Local 82 71 Slurry 235 25 5875 $1,445.10 RIDGEFIELD END WILMINGTO LN Local 82 71 Slurry 85 25 2125 $522.70 RIDGEFIELD WILMINGTO LN CUL•DE•SA Local 82 71 Slurry 740 25 18500 $4,550.53 ROCKINGHAM END 132 NO AV Local 82 71 Slurry 730 25 18250 $4,48904 Sub Total $589,66518 EnRir»erinR & Admin.10%. $58,966.52 Overlay Cost-$1.537/s.l. , Thin Overlay-$0.737/s.l. Slurry Cost-$02451.1 Total Accumulated Reserve Total 3860,401.49 FY 2012.2012 Read Name Limits from To Classill"ton 1999 PCI 2011 PCI Recommend Action PrLlenRth Width Area (s,l.) Cost FONNER CITY LIMI 115 TH AV Collector 100 76 'Reconstruction 1290 35 45150 $270,900.00 FONNER 115 TH AV Collector 82 58 'Reconstruction 175 35 6125 $36,750.00 FONNER CITY LIMI 107 TH CT Collector 82 58 'Reconstruction 680 35 23800 $142.800.00 FONNER 107 TH CT ERROL ST Collector 82 58 'Reconstruction 680 35 23800 $142.80000 FONNER 113 TH PL CITY LIMI Collector 100 76 'Reconstruction 830 35 29050 $174,300 DO TIEDEMAN 106 TH AV MEADOW ST Collector 100 76 Thin Overlay 1010 35 35350 $26.868.19 TIEDEMAN MEADOW ST TIGARD ST Collector 100 76 Thin Overlay 990 35 34650 $26.336.15 WALNUT PATHFINDE CT GRANT AV Collector 100 76 TOverlay 950 35 33250 $25,272.06 ALDERBROOK ALDERBROO DR ALDERBROO DR NeiRh'd Route 72 60 7=0. r4V 1745 30 52350 $39,789.25 ALDERBROOK ALOERBROO DR ALDERBROO OR NaIRh'd Route 83 71 Thin Overlay 1745 30 52350 $39.789.25 ASH 100 TH AV COWLES CT NeIRh'd Route 88 76 Thin Overlay 465 30 13950 $10,602.87 ASH GARRETT ST HILL ST No th-d Route 92 80 Thin Overlay 1565 30 46950 $35,684.91 BENCHVIEW BRIM PL CLEARVIEW WY Noland Rout. 85 73 Thin Overlay 1025 30 3075o) $23:37191 CANTERBURY 309 TH AV 103 RD AV NeIalyd Route 90 78 Thin Overlay 1170 30 35100 $27,478.52 COMMERCIAL HALL BL MAIN ST Nelah'd Route 92 80 Thin Overlay 1765 30 52950 $41.452.64 FALCON RISE MORNING H DR 125 TH CT NeiRh'd Route 90 78 Thin Overlay 1294 30 38820 $30,390,78 FREWING CUL•DE•SA ASH AV NeIRh'd Rout. 82 70 Thin Overl ay 275 30 8250 $6,458.63 FREWING OMARA ST ASH AV N41Rh'd Rout. 86 74 Thin Overlay 590 30 17700 $13,856.69 GARRETT CRESMER OR PACIFIC HW NeiM1h'd Routs 93 BI Thin Overlay 860 30 25800 $20,197.89 GRANT PARK ST PARK ST N.hm'd Route 85 73 Thin O r'4V 180 30 5400 $4,22747 GRANT PARK ST SCHOOL ST NeiRh'd Route 83 71 Thin Overlay 612 30 18360 $14,373.38 GRANT WALNUT ST MCKENZIE ST NeIRh'd Route 93 81 Thin Overlay 455 30 13650 $10.686.09 GRANT MCKENZIE ST JOHNSON ST Nei4h'd Route 90 78 Thin Overlay 540 30 16200 $12.68240 GRANT CUL•DE•SA GRANT CT N3hm'd Route 85 73 Thin Overlay 300 30 9000 $7.045.78 HILLSHIRE BLUE GUM CT WESTRIDGE TE NeiRh'd Route 90 78 Thin Overlay 745 30 22350 $17,497.01 MCDONALD PACIFIC HW 105TH AV Naigh'd Route 92 BO Thin Overlay 404 30 12120 $9,38831 NORTH DAKOTA 115 TH AV 114 TH PL N4iRh'd Route 83 71 Thin Overlay 275 30 8250 $6.458.63 STARVIEW END END Local 82 70 Slurry 170 25 4250 $1,076.75 TALON AERIE DR ENO Local 82 70 Slurry 12 25 3125 $791.73 TANGELA 95 TH AV CULDE-SA Local 82 70 Slurry 335 5 25 8375 32.121.64 TANOAK BRIM PL CUL•DE•SA Local 82 70 Slurry 335 25 8375 $2,12184 TERRACE TRAILS CULDE-SA 115 TH AV Local 82 70 Slurry 1015 25 25375 $6.42886 VARNS 72 NO AV END Local 82 70 Slurry 140 25 3500 $886.74 WAGONER MISTLETOE DR CUL•DE-SA Local 82 70 Slurry 255 25 6375 $1,615.13 WATKINS CULDE-SA WATKINSAV Local 82 70 SIUM 370 25 9250 $2.343.52 WELLINGTON CUL-DE-SA ROCKINOMA DR Locat 82 70 Slurry 415 25 10375 $2.621.55 WHITEHALL 135 TH AV BROADMOOR PI local 82 70 Slurry 250 25 6250 $1,583.46 WHITECEDAR CULDE-SA SENCHVIEW TR Local 82 70 Slurry 520 25 13000 $3,293.60 WILMINGTON ENO RIDGEFIEL LN Local 82 70 Slurry 475 25 11875 $3.008.58 WINTERLAKE CULDE-SA WINTERLAK DR Local 82 70 Slurry 225 25 5625 $1,425.32 WOODSNIRE MORNINGST DR FERNRIDGE TE Local 82 70 Slurry 560 25 14000 $3.54696 122 NO KATHERINE ST CUL•DE•SA Local 82 70 Slurry 535 25 13375 $3.388.61 123RD WALNUT ST CU40E•SA local 82 70 Slurry 340 25 8500 $2,IS3.S1 123 RD GAARDE ST AERIE DR Local 82 70 Slurry 170 25 4250 $1,076.75 124 TH AERIE DR ENO Local 82 70 Slurry 250 25 6250 $1,583.46 129 TH MORNINGST DR END Loca l 82 70 Slurry 180 25 4500 $1.140.09 133 RD BENISH ST SENISH ST Local 82 70 Slurry 150 25 3750 $950.08 FIR 72 NO AV 72 NO AV Local 84 72 Slurry 935 25 23375 $5,922.15 GREENLEAF SUMMERFIE OR GREENS Wy Local 84 72 Slurry 1220 25 30500 $7,727.30 AERIE TALON LN CUL-DE•SA Local 84 72 Slurry 1510 25 37750 $9,564.11 BLUE GUM HILLSHIRE DR CULDE-SA Loral 83 71 Slurry 260 25 6500 $1,646.80 13RMKSIDE BROOKSIDE AV CULDE-SA Local 83 71 Slurry 315 25 7875 $1,995.16 FANNO CREEK FANNO CRE LP FANNO CRE DR Local 83 71 Slurry 710 25 17750 $4.497.03 SUMMEPCREST NORTH OAK ST 121 ST AV Local 84 72 Slurry 1729 25 43225 $10,951.23 COPPER CREEK RIVERWOOD LN CULDE-SA Local 84 72 Slurs 1945 25 48625 532,319.34 69TH HAMPTON ST HAMPTON ST Local 84 72 Slurry 175 25 4,175 $1.108.42 88 TH REILING ST END local 84 72 Slurry 130 25 3250 $823.40 89TH CULDE-S4 CUL-DE-SA Local 84 72 Slurry 550 25 13750 $3,483.62 Sub Total $1.320.762.56 Empneerina & Admin-10%. $132.076.26 Overlay Cost-$1.583/s.l., Thin OVeAay.$0.760/s.t. Slurry Cost.1.0.253/s.l. Reconslruction•$6.0/s.I. Total MP mw or, I -win Accumulated Reserve Total $207464.68 FY 2012.2013 Road Name Limits From To ClassiRuton 1999 PCI 2012PCI Recommend Action PrLienath Width Area(s,l.) Cost NORTH DAKOTA GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RC Ne;Rh'd Route 85 72 Thin Overlay 390 30 11700 $9,159.51 NORTH DAKOTA 95 TH AV 95 TH AV Nelah-d Route 85 72 Thin Overlay 280 30 8400 $6.576.06 NORTH DAKOTA 94 TH AV 90 TH AV N41Rh'd Route as 72 Thin Overlay 1115 30 33450 $26,186.80 OMARA MCDONALO ST HILL ST Neigh, Route 85 72 Thin Overlay 1970 30 59100 $46,267.26 OMARA CHELSEA LP HALL BL Neigh, Route 90 77 Thin OVArlay 1290 30 38700 $30.296.83 L SATTLER 100 TH AV 100 TH AV NeiRh'd Rout. 93 80 Thin Overlay 195 30 5850 $4.57975 N SATTLER 98 TH AV 96 TH AV Nehm-d Route 93 80 Thin Overlay 510 30 15300 $11,977.82 SATTLER 96 TH AV 92 NO AV NeIRh'd Route 90 77 Thin Overlay 1320 30 39600 $31,001.41 SATTLER 91 ST AV 91 ST AV Neigh -d Route 90 77 Thin Overlay 265 30 7950 $6,223.77 SATTLER 91 ST AV 91 ST AV Neigh-d Route 90 77 Thln Overlay 120 30 3600 $2,818.31 SATTLER NO NAME DR HALL BL NeiRh'd Route Be 75 Thin Overlay 995 30 291150 $23,368.49 e SEQUOIA PARKWAY BOONESFER RD BONITA RD N41Rh'd Route 92 79 Thin Overlay 3085 30 92550 $72.464.05 SPRINGWOOD SUMMER IA DR NORTH OAK ST No ,h*d Route 97 84 Thin Overlay 790 30 23700 $18,553.87 e SPRINGWOOD IRONWOOD LP IRONWOOD LP NsiAh'd Route el 68 Thin Overlay 215 30 6450 $5,04947 SPRINGWOOO SCROLLS F RD SCHOLLS F RD NeIRh'd Route el 68 Thin Overlay 490 30 14700 $11.508.10 SPAINGBROOK BARROWS ( RD TALLWOOD DR N4IRh'd Route 90 77 Thin Overlay 360 30 10800 $8,454.93 SUMMERFIELD 114 TH CT 98 TH AV Ne1Rh'd Route 87 74 Thin Overlay 3680 30 110400 $86.428.18 SUMMERFIELD 114 TH AV DURHAM RO Ne1Rh'd Route 90 77 Thin Overlay 300 30 9000 $7.045.78 SUMMERFIELD ALDERBR00 DR ALDERBR00 DR NaiRh'd Route 78 65 Thtn Overlay ] 080 30 32400 $25,364.79 TIGARD 115 TH AV TWIN PARK PL NaIR11d Route 94 81 Thin Overlay 950 30 28500 $22,311.62 TIGARD TWIN PARK PL FANNO CRE OR Nalah'd Route 87 74 Thln OverlaV 1862 30 55860 $43,730.78 TIGARD FANNO CRE OR TIEDEMAN AV NaiRh'd Route 90 77 Thin Overlay 370 30 11100 $8,689.79 ALBERTA END 121 ST AV Local 84 71 Slurry 660 25 16500 $4.305.75 AMBIANCE GENESIS LP CUL-bE•SA Local 64 71 Slurry 460 25 11500 $3,00098 FANNO CREEK 80 TH CT FANNO CRE PL Lout 84 71 Slurry 165 25 4125 $1.076.44 FANNO CREEK FANNO CRE CT COLONY CR CT Local 84 71 Slurry 220 25 5500 $1,435.25 FERN 138 TH AV CITY LIMI Lou; 84 71 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2,609.55 GREENLEAF GREENS WY GREENS WY Local 64 71 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2,609.55 KNOLL HALL BL HUNZIKER ST Local 64 71 Slurry 785 2S 19625 $5,121.23 LAKEWOOD IRONWOOD LP CULDE-SA Local 84 71 Slurry 370 25 9250 $2,413.83 MARA CUL•DE•Sa 79 TH AV Lou; 84 71 Slurry 290 25 7250 $1.891.92 MILTON BONITA RD CULDE-SA Local 84 71 Slurry 1520 25 38000 $9,916.28 MINT BOXELDER ST CUL•OE-SA Local 64 71 Slurry 335 25 8375 $2.185.50 APPENDIX A-2 Pap X2.5 MOUNTAIN RIDGE CUL.DE-SA 134 TH AV Local 84 71 Slurry 295 25 7375 $1,924.54 NOVA CUL•DE-SA GENESIS LP Local 84 71 Slurrv 275 25 6875 $3,794.06 PICKS 103 RD AV SERENA WY Local 84 71 Slurry 120 25 3000 $782.86 PICKS SERENA WY SERENA WY Local 84 71 Slurry 200 25 5000 $1,304.77 REILING 88 TH AV CULDE-SA Local 84 73 Slurry 645 25 16125 $4,207.89 SYLVAN CUL.DE-SA SERENA WY Local 84 71 Slurrv 265 25 6625 $1,728.82 WILLOWBROOK END 309 TH AV Local 84 71 Slurrv 120 25 3000 $782.86 100 TH LADY MARI OR MURDOCK Sr Local 84 71 Slurry 845 25 21125 55,512.67 ASHBURY SWENDON LP SWENDON LP Local 85 72 Slurrv 370 25 9250 $2,413.83 FERNRIDGE END MORNINGST OF Local 86 73 Slurrv 470 25 11750 $3,066.22 WAVERLY 92 ND AV END Local 86 73 Slurrv 1215 25 30375 $7.926.50 BASSWOOD CU1.DE-SA IRONWOOD LP Local 86 73 Slurry 352 25 8800 $2,296.40 BOXELDER MINT PL ESSEX DR Local 86 73 Slurrv 240 25 6000 $1,565.73 CHIMNEY RIDGE MORNINGH DR 131 ST AV Local 86 7351u'r, 520 25 13000 $3,392.41 ESSEX HILLSHIRE OR BOXELDER ST Local 86 73 Slurry 1590 25 39750 $10,372.95 FANNO CREEK CULDE-SA CULDE•SA Local 86 73 Slurrv 270 25 6750 $1,761.44 MARCIA 139 TH AV LIDEN OR Loca l 86 73 Slurry 725 25 18125 $4,729.80 113TH FONNER ST END Local 86 73 Slur" 475 25 11875 $3,098.84 118TH CUL•DE•SA SPRINGWOO DR LoUI 86 73 Slurry 475 25 11875 $3,098.84 67 TH CUL-DE'SA OAK ST Loral 88 75 Slurry 255 25 6375 $1,663.59 69TH OAK ST END Local 88 75 Slurry 275 25 6875 51.794.06 FAIRVIEW CUL•DE•SA FAIRVIEW LN Local 88 75 Slurry 335 25 8875 $2,315.97 WEAVER FANNO CRE DR END Local 88 75 Slurry 140 25 3500 $913.34 123 RD END MARION ST Local 88 75 Slurry 130 25 3250 $848.10 76TH BOND ST END Local 95 82 Slurry 255 25 6375 $1,663.59 91 ST CUL•DE•SA NORTH OAK ST Local 95 82 Slum 495 25 12375 $3,229.31 94 TH GREENBURG RD CUL•DE•SA Local 95 82 Slurry 154 25 3850 $1,004.68 FANNO CREEK END BOONESFER RD Local 95 82 Slurry 390 25 9750 52.544.31 109 TH NAEVE ST NAEVE ST Local 95 82 Slurry 500 25 12500 $3,261.93 Sub Total $625.613.95 EnainseimR 6 Admin•10%, 582.561.40 Overlay Cosl.$1.630/s.l. , Thin Oveday•f0.782/s.(. Slurry Cosl.$O.260/s.f. Raconstruction.$6. 1B/s.t Total Accumulated Resents Total $319,389.33 FY 2013.2014 Road Name Limits From To class;ncaton 1999 PCI 2013 PCI Recommend Actlon PrL1.nalh Width Area (a.l.) Cost VENTURA 72 NO AV VENTURA PL N.IRh'd Route 83 69 Thin Overlay 1840 30 55200 $44.510.51 VENTURA VENTURA OR CUL-DE•SA N.Igh'd Route BB 74 Thin Overlay 355 30 10650 $8.587.63 WALNUT PACIFIC HW PACIFIC FIN NaiRh'd Route 87 73 Thi Ovar, 325 30 9750 $7,861.91 WATKINS PACIFIC HW DERRY DEL CT N.iRh'tl Route as 71 Thin Qrerln 1697 30 50910 541.051.27 WINTERLAKE CULDE-SA SHORE OR Neiah'd Route 90 76 Thin Overlay 2030 30 60900 $49,106.70 100 TH SATTLER ST LADY MARI DR Neiah'd Route 93 79 Thin Cveday 250 30 7500 $6,047.62 loo TH MURDOCK ST PEMBROOK ST NaiRh'd Route 85 71 Thin Overlay 350 30 10500 $8. 466.67 )00TH INEZ ST MCDONALD ST NaiRh'd Pout. 65 71 Thin D.,IJV 1445 30 43350 $34,95527 308TH TUALATIN DR TITAN LN NeiAh'd Route 93 79 Thin Overlay 985 30 29550 $23,SZ7.64 Ito TH FAIRHAVEN ST PARK ST Neiah'd Route 80 65 Thin Owrlry 789 30 23670 $19,OBG.30 115 TH GAARDE ST GENESIS LP Nalah'd Route 85 71 Thin Overlay 2364 30 64,20 $52.348.23 116TH END WALNUT ST N.IRh'd Route 92 78 Thin Overlay 1025 30 30750 $24,795.26 116 TH ANN ST KATHERINE ST Nei.Rh'd Route 85 71 Thln Overlay 1020 30 30600 $24.674.30 116TH BEEF BEND RD CUL.DE-SA N.IRh'd Route 85 71 Thin Owrlay 670 30 20100 $16,207.63 327 TH 128 TH AV KATHERINE ST NeiRh'd Route 90 76 Thin Overlay 1500 30 45000 $36,285.74 127 TH CULDE-SA FALCON R; OR Neiah'd Route 85 73 Thin Overlay 505 30 15150 $12.216.20 128 TH WALNUT ST FALCON RI DR N.IRh'd Route 90 76 Thin Overlay 2335 30 70050 $56.484.81 128 TH CU3.DE:SA FALCON RI DR NaiRh'd Route 85 71 Thin Overlay 515 30 15450 $12,458.10 130 TH CULOE SA STARVIEW DR NaiRh'd Route 90 76 Thin Overlay 995 30 28350 322,860.02 135 TH WESTRIDGE TE LAUREN LN NaiRh'd Route 90 76 Thin Overlay 320 30 9600 $7,740.96 135 TH LAUREN IN WALNUT LN Neiah'd Route 90 76 Thin Overlay 1350 30 40500 $32,657.17 69 TH HAMPTON ST DARTMOUTH Sl Local 100 86 Slurry 1470 25 36750 $9,877.79 113TH END CITY LIMI Local 61 47 Overlay 580 25 14500 524,358.48 82 ND PFAFFLE ST PFAFFLE ST Loca l 64 50 Slurry 370 25 9250 $2,486.25 ASH HILL ST HILL ST Local 71 57 Overlay 270 25 6750 511,339.29 BROOK CULDE•SA 124 TH AV Local 76 62 Slurry 295 25 7375 $1.982.28 CARMEN 121 ST AV 121 ST AV Local 67 53 Overlay 500 25 12500 $20,998.69 CENTER GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RC LOUT 67 53 Overlay 500 25 12500 $20.998.69 CENTER GREENBURG RD 87 TH AV Local 71 57 Overlay 422 25 10550 $17,722.90 DAWNS CULDE•SA 113 TH PL Lou; 76 62 Slum 264 25 6600 $1,773.97 ELECTRIC MAIN ST END Local 74 60 Slurry 180 25 4500 $1.209.52 Sub Total $654,977.81 Emtlneerimt & Admin.30%. $65.497.78 Overlay C.041.679/s.l. , Thin 0yerlaV.$OBO6/s.l. Slur" Cost-$0.268/s.(. Reconstruction-$6.365/s.(. Total Accumulated Reserve Total $398.913.75 FY 2014.2015 Road Name Limits From To Classinuton 1999 PCI 2014 PC$ Recommend Action PrLLenRth Width Area (a.(.) Cost COMMERCIAL PACIFIC )IVY 95 TH AV NaIRh'd Route 100 88 'Reconstruction 1675 30 50250 $329.457.19 91 ST REILING ST CUL•DE-SA NeIRh'd Route 93 78 Thin O-1-v 550 30 16500 $13.703.92 98 TH ELROSE ST MCDONALD ST NeIRh'd Route 100 8.5 Thin Oyeday 325 30 9750 $8,097.77 98TH CUL•DE-SA ELROSE ST NeiRh'd Rout 95 80 Thin Overlay 310 30 9300 $7,72402 ALDERBROOK ALDERBROO OR END Ne)Rh'd Routs 100 85 Thin Overl ay 280 30 8400 $6,976.54 ALDERBROOK DURHAM RD SATTLER ST N.IRh'd Route 100 B5 Thin Overlay 2855 30 85650 $71,135.78 ALDERBROOK ALDERBROO OR END NeiRh'd Route 300 85 Thin Overlay 310 30 9300 $7.724.02 KABLE END 100 TH AV N.IRh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 1450 30 43500 $36,128.50 KABLE 100 TH AV 98 TH AV Neiah'd Route 97 82 Thin Overlav 380 30 11400 59.468.16 MORNING HILL 335 TH AV FALCON RI DR N.IRh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 634 30 19020 515,796.88 NAEVE PACIFIC HW PACIFIC NW NeiRh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 540 30 16200 $13,454.75 NAEVE ROYALITY PW 109 TH AV Nailth'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 895 30 26850 $22,300.01 NORTH DAKOTA SCHOLLS F RD PRIVATE RD Ne1Rb'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 620 30 18600 $15,448.05 NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE RD SPRINGWOO DR NeiRh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 245 30 7350 $6,104.47 A NORTH DAKOTA 114 TH PL 112 TH AV N.IRh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 625 30 18750 $15,572.63 NORTH DAKOTA 109 TH AV PRIVATE RD NalRh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 950 30 28500 $23,670.40 OAK 69 TH AV 65 TH AV N.IRh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overl ay 960 30 28800 $23,919.56 PINE 72 ND AY 71 ST AV NaiRh'd Reuta 100 85 Thin Overlay 450 30 13500 $11.212.29 PINE 71 ST AV 69 TH AV NeIRh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 640 30 19200 $15,946.37 r ROYALITY PACIFIC HW NAEVE ST N.IRh'tl Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 1035 30 31050 $25,788.28 ROYALITY PACIFIC HW 109 TH AV Ne1Rh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 1205 30 36150 $30,024.03 I SUMMERFIELD CUL•DE•SA ALDERBROO DR Nalah'd Route 100 85 Thin Overl ay 175 30 5250 $4,360.34 SUMMERFIELD 98 TH AV ALDERBROO DR NsIRh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 940 30 28200 $23,421.24 GRANT JOHNSON ST TIGARD ST Local 93 78 Slurry 1090 25 27250 $7,544.07 LOMITA 90 TH AV 90 TH AV Local 66 51 Slurry 335 25 8375 $2.318.59 PARK 310THAV DERRY DEL CT Local 71 56 Slurry 280 25 7000 $1,937.93 ROSE VISTA 121 ST AV GAARDE ST Local 76 61 Stur" 10&5 25 27125 57.509.47 ' TECH CENTER END 72 NO AV Loral 72 57 Slum 1210 25 30250 $8,374.61 WARNER PACIFIC HW END LoU 76 61 Slurry 275 25 6875 $1.903.32 100 TH MCDONALD ST ASH AV L.: 74 59 Slurry 575 25 14375 $3,979.67 124 TH WALNUT ST WALNUT ST Local 75 60 Slurry 475 25 11875 $3,287.56 124 TH ANN CT KATHERINE ST Lou; 75 60 Slurry 540 25 13500 $3,737.43 129 TH END 128 TH AV Local 72 57 Overlay 319 25 7975 $13.799.08 66 TH FRANKLIN ST CULDE•SA Local 85 70 Slurry 185 25 4625 $1,280.42 66 TM OAK ST TAYLORS F RD Local 1D0 85 SturrY 625 25 15625 $4,325.73 69 TH HAMPTON ST 14AMPTON ST Local 100 85 Slum 580 25 14500 34,014.28 70TH END HAMPTON ST Local 85 70 Slurry 520 25 13000 $3,599.01 74 TH DURHAM RD BONITA RD Local 95 80 Slurry 4670 25 116750 $32,323.86 APPENDIX A-2 Pane A•2-6 76TH BOND ST BOND ST Local 90 7S Slurry 145 23 3625 51,003.57 76 TH FIR ST VARNS ST Lou: 91 76 Slurry 513 25 12875 33.564.40 78TH PACIFIC HW PFAFFLE ST Local 85 70 Slurry 317 25 7925 (2.194.01 Sub Total $854844,130.2 EnAineerlnit bAdmin-10%, .4 1302 Overlay Cost-31.730/6.l.Thln 0vedapf0.830/s.l. Slurry Cost-50.276/s.t. Reconstructi-$6.556/s.1- Total Accumulated Resem Total $270.370.50 FY 2015.2016 Road Name Limits From To ClasslRcaton 1999 PCI 2015 PCI Pi mmmend Action PdJ.nRth Width Area (s.l.) Cost VENTURA BARBARA LN ALFRED ST Ne:Rh'd Route 97 81 Thin Grad" 1480 30 44400 $37,982.27 VENTURA/69TH CUL•DE•SA VENTURA CT N.IRh'd Rout. 95 79 Thin Oreday 211 30 6330 $5,415.04 VENTURA VENTURA CT CUL•DE•SA N.IRh'd Rout. 93 17 Thin Overlay 550 30 16500 $14.115.03 WATKINS DERRY DEL CT WATKINS PL N.IRh'd Route 100 34 Thin Overlay 365 30 10950 $9.367.25 WINTERLAKE WINTER(AK CT SCHOLLS F RD N►IRh'd Route 100 84 Thin Overlay 1640 30 49200 $42,088.46 103 RD RIVERWOOO LN DURHAM RD N.IRh'd Route 100 84 Thin Overlay 1545 30 46350 $39,650.41 100 TH PEMBROOK ST INEZ ST N.IRh'd Rout. 100 84 Thin Overlay 330 30 9900 $8,469.02 110 TH GAARDE ST FAIRHAVEN ST N.IRh'd Rout. 100 84 Thin Overlay 1245 30 37350 $31,951.30 115 TH 114 TH AV SAMBI LN Nai$th'd Route 97 81 Thin Overlay 565 30 16950 $14,499.99 115 TH TIGARD ST NORTH DAK ST N.IRh'd Rout. 100 84 Thin Overlay 910 30 27300 $23,353.96 115 TH NORTH DAK ST SPRINGWOO DR N.IRh'd Rout. 100 84 Thin Overlay 1765 30 52950 $45,296.42 116 TH END TIGARD DR N.IRh'd Rout. 97 81 Thin Dar" 385 30 11550 $9.880.52 116 TH/KATHERINE 116 TH AV 116 TH AV N.IRh'd Route 100 84 Thin Onrlay 158 30 4740 $4,054.86 116 TH CUL•DE-SA FAIRVIEW U4 N.IRh'd Rout. 93 77 Thin Overlay 211 30 6330 55,415.04 131 ST WALNUT ST SENISH ST U.iRh'd Rout. 100 84 Thin Overlay 1065 30 31950 $27,331.84 131 ST CUL-DE•SA HAWKS SEA ST N.lRh'd Route 100 64 Thln Overlay 245 30 7350 $6,287.61 81 ST PFAFFLE ST STEVE ST Local 88 72 Slurry 950 25 23750 $6.772.36 83 RD PFAFFLE ST CUL-OE•SA Lou; 90 74 Scurry 1335 25 33375 $9,516.95 87TH PINEBROOK ST CUL•DE-SA Local 80 64 Slurry 300 25 7500 $2,138.64 AR TH SATTLER ST REILING ST Local 90 74 Slurry 425 25 10625 $3,029.74 88TH PINEBROOK ST CUL-DE-SA Loca l 91 75 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2.851.52 89 TH END END Lou: B7 71 Slurry 115 25 2875 $819.81 89 TH CUL•DE•SA SCHECKLA DR Local 90 74 Slurry 205 25 5125 $1,461.40 89TH CUL-DE•SA REILING ST Local 87 71 Slurry 170 25 4250 $1,211.90 92 ND CENTER ST NORTH DAK ST Lout 100 S4 Slurry 868 25 21700 $6,187.80 92ND/MURDOCX 92 ND AV CUL-OE•SA Local 90 74 Slurry 175 25 4375 $1.247.54 94 TH CUL•DE•SA NORTH OAK ST Local l 85 69 Slurry 350 25 8750 $2,495.08 94TH CUL•DE•SA VIEWTR Loca 88 72 Slurry 170 25 4250 $1,211.90 96TH SATTLER ST MURDOCK ST Local 93 77 Slurry 895 25 22375 $6,380.28 AERIE CUL•DE•SA TALON LN Loca l 85 69 Slurry 325 25 8125 $2,316.86 ALBERTA END END Local 87 71 Slurry 410 25 10250 $2.922.81 ALPINE VIEW MISTLETOE DR 134 TH OR Lau1 90 74 Sleet 250 25 6250 $1,782.20 33 RD" END Local 90 74 31urry 160 25 4000 $1,140.61 ALPINE VIEW 133. AN CUL•DE-SA 121 ST AV Lou; 83 67 Slurry 440 25 11000 $3,136.67 ANN 121 ST AV 116 TH AV Local 65 69 Slurry 1030 25 25750 $7,342.67 ASH END BURNHAM ST Local 85 69 Slurry 285 25 712 $2.031.71 ASH ASH AV ASH AV Local 95 79 Slurry 1365 25 34125 5 $9,730.82 ASHWOOD CUL•DE•SA HAZELWOOD LP Local 87 71 Slurry 317 25 7925 12,259.83 ASPINE RIDGE END BULL IAOUN RD Local 85 69 Slurry 1525 25 38125 $10,871.43 ATLANTA 70 TH AV 67 TH AV Local 95 79 Scurry 614 25 15350 54,377.09 AVON 88 TH AV CUL-OE•SA Lora; 87 71 Slurry 395 23 9875 52,815.88 BARBAR OTH BARBARA LN CUL.DE-SA Local 83 67 Slurry 220 25 5500 $1,568.34 BARNUM GARRETT ST SARNUM/98 OF Local 85 69 Slurry 345 25 8625 42.459.44 SARNUM/98TH BARNUM DR CUI.DE SA Local 85 69 Slurry 140 25 3500 $998.03 SAYLOR 72 ND" 68 TH PW Local 85 69 Slurry 1145 25 28625 $8.162.48 BAYLOR 68 TH AV 66 TH AV Local as 69 Slurry 529 25 13225 $3,771.14 BEVELAND CUL•DE-SA CUL-DE•SA Local 90 74 Slurry 1030 25 25750 $7,342.67 SEVELAND CUL-DE•SA 72 NO AV Local 85 69 Slurry 739 25 18475 $5.268.19 SEVELAND 72 NO AV 70 TH AV Local 88 72 Slurry 700 25 17500 $4,990.16 BIRDSVIEW 130 TH AV 129 TH AV Local 90 74 Slurry 205 25 5125 $1,461.40 SLUESTEM END TALLWOOD DR Local 90 74 Scurry 120 25 3000 $855.46 BOXWOOD COTTONWOO IN CUL•DE•SA Local 86 70 Slurry 360 25 9000 $2,566.37 BRENTWOOD CUL•DE-SA BRENTWOOD P( Local 85 69 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2.851.52 BRENTWOOD CUL-DE•SA ALDERBROO DR Laval 87 71 Slurry 845 25 21125 56,023.84 SRIDGEVIEW SHOREVIEW PL CUL.DE•SA Local 85 69 Slurry 215 25 5375 $1.532.69 BRITTANY 135 TH AV WINTERtAK OR Local 90 74 Slurry 1122 25 28050 $7,998.52 BROADMOOR WHITEHALL UN CUL-DE•SA Loa 87 71 Slurry 420 25 10500 $2.994.10 BRWKSDE WALNUT ST JOHNSON ST Local l 94 78 Slurry 975 25 24375 36.950.58 BROOKSIDE BROOKSIDE PL JOHNSON AV Local 83 67 Slurry 460 25 11500 $3,279.25 BURLCREST SUMMERCRE DR 115TH AV Local 85 69 Slurry 1505 25 37625 $10.728.85 SURLHEIGHTS 121 ST AV SURLCREST DR Lou; 85 69 Slurry 680 25 17000 $4,847.59 CARDINAL 72 NO AV SEQUOIA P Local 85 69 Slurry 470 25 11750 $3,350.54 CAROLE CUL-DE•SA 81 ST AV Lou: 85 69 Slurry 330 25 8250 $2,352.51 CENTER LINCOLN AV GREENSURG RC Local 63 67 Slurry 1475 25 36875 $10,514.99 `..Y CENTURY OAK CENTURY 0 OR CENTURY 0 DR Local 83 67 Slurry 540 25 13500 $3,849.55 CENTURY OAK CUL•DE•SA CENTURYOCR Local el 65 Slurry 2465 25 61625 517,572.50 CENTURY OAK CENTURY O CR SUMMERFRE DR Local 85 69 Slurry $81 25 14525 $4,141.84 CHATEAU CUL•DE•SA 308 TH AV Local 90 74 Slurry 570 25 14250 $4,063.42 q CHEHALEM CUL•DE-SA CUL•DE-SA Local 90 74 Slurry 550 25 13750 $3.920.84 CHERRY 74 TH AV VARNS ST Local 93 77 Slurry 1745 25 43625 $12,439.76 CHURCHILL SO TH AV 79 TH AV Local 90 74 Slurry 415 25 10375 $2,958.45 CLINTON 72 NO AV END Local 91 75 Slurry 634 25 15850 $4,519.66 CLINTON 68 TH PW 67 TH AV Local 81 65 Slurry 270 25 6750 $1,924.78 CLOUD MCFARLANO BL CUL•DE•SA Local 90 74 Slurry 505 25 12625 $3,600.05 CLYDESDALE CUL-DE•SA 106TH AV Local 85 69 Slurry 158 25 3950 $1,126.35 CLYDESDALE/105TH CLYDESDAL PL CUL•DE-SA Local 82 66 Slurry 106 25 2650 $755.65 CLYDESDALE 106 TH AV CUL•DE•SA Local 87 71 Slurry 361 25 9025 $2.573.5 W 0 OK SERENA WY CUL-DE•SA Local 90 74 Slurry 190 25 4750 $1,354.47 CORAL GREENBURG RD GREENSURG RC Local 85 69 Slurry 215 25 5375 $1,532.69 CORNELL TIGARD ST CU4DE•SA Local 85 69 slurry 375 25 9375 $2.673.30 COWL ES CUL•DE•SA ASH AV Local 83 67 Slurry 225 25 5625 $1,603.98 CRANE END TALLWOOD OR Loca l 90 74 Slurry 100 25 2500 $712.88 CRESMER ASH AV GARRETT ST Local 82 66 Slurry 1225 25 30625 58,732.79 OANBUSH CUL•DE•SA WINTERLAK DR Local 85 69 Slurry 260 25 6500 $1,853.49 Sub Total $605,991.15 ~ EnRine.rlnR & AdmIn-1056, 560.599.11 Thin Owrlay.30.855/s.l. Slurry Cost.S0.285/s.l. Total 0 Accumuatad Reserve Total $403,760.23 ! FY 2016.2017 ` Road Name Llmlb From To Classlrkaton 1999 PCI 2016 PCI Recommend Action PrLJ.nKth Width Ana(s.l.) Coat ' DARMEL CU4DE-SA 96 TH AV Local 85 68 Slurry 300 25 7500 $2.202.80 DUCHILLY CUL•DE•SA HAZELHILLDR Local 83 66 Slurry 565 25 14125 54,148.61 EDGEWATER CUL•DE•SA SUMMERCRE DI Local 90 73 Slurry 300 25 7500 $2.202.80 ELEMAR CUL•DE•SA ALPINE RI OR Local 85 68 Slurry 575 25 14375 $4,222.03 ELROSE 93 RD AV CUL-DE•SA Local 88 71 Slurry 380 25 9500 $2,790.21 ESSEX BOXELDER ST LAUREN LN Lou( 90 73 Slurry 1230 25 30750 $9,031.48 FAIRHAVEN/112TH CUL•DE-SA FAIRHAVEN ST Local 82 65 Slurry 160 25 4000 51.174.83 FAIRHAVEN FAIRHAVEN WY WATKINB AV Local 91 74 Slurry 343 25 8625 $2,533.22 FAIRVIEW 115 TH AV FAIRVIEW CT Local 90 73 Slurry 405 25 10125 $2,973.78 FANNO CREEK BONITA RD 80 TH CT Local 95 78 Slurry 1155 25 28875 $8.480.78 FANNO CREEK FANNO CRE PL FANNO CRE CT Local 87 70 Slurry 660 25 16500 $4,846.16 FANNO CREEK COLONY CR CT HALL BL Lou; 90 73 Slurry 1000 25 25000 $7,342.67 FANNO CREEK FANNO CRE DR CUL.DE•SA Local 85 68 Slurry 320 25 8000 $2.349.65 APPENDIX A-2 Pep A-2.7 FEIRING SWINDON LP 135 TH AV Local 87 70 Slurrv 545 25 17625 $4.001.75 FIR CHERRY DR 76 TH AV Local 91 14 Slurry 295 26 7175 12.166.09 FIR END 74 TH AV Local 90 71 Slurry 05 75 1626 $477.27 GALLD TIGMD ST TIGMD ST Local 65 68 Slurry 664 76 15650 (4,655 25 GARDEN PARK 110 TH AV 110 TH AV Local 85 68 Slurry 706 75 6125 50525 GARDEN HALL BL CULDE•SA Local 90 73 Slurry, 10211 25 25625 $7,52624 GARRETT BEREA OR CUL•DE•SA 1.0" 1 83 66 Slurry 211 25 5275 $1.54930 GENTLEWOODS CUL.DE-SA GENTLEWOO DF Local 85 68 Slurry 255 29 6375 31.812.36 GLACIER LILY SUMMER LA DR SUMMER LA DR Local 90 73 Slurry 1755 25 47875 112.886 38 GLENWOOD CUL•DE•SA HAZELWOOD LP Loaf 87 70 Slurry 264 25 6600 11,975.46 GONZAGA 72 NO AV 70 TH AV Local 93 76 Slurry 690 25 17250 ,6,06644 GREENLAND RIVERWO0D LN SERENA WY Local 87 70 Slurry 775 75 19375 $5,69057 GREENFIELD END RIDGEFIEL LN Local 85 68 Slurry 610 25 16250 14,47903 GREENSWARD 86 TH AV HALL BL Lou: 90 73 Slurrv 176 25 1375 $1.284 97 GREENS SUMMERFIE OR SUMMERFIE DR Lou) 85 68 Slurry 1588 25 39700 $11.66016 GREENS GREENLEAF TR HIGHLAND OR Loral 83 66 Slurry 655 i5 8875 $2.606 611 GRIMSON CUL•DE•SA SERENA WY Local 85 68 Slurry 310 25 7750 (2.27623 HAMLET HAMLET ST CUL•DE•SA Louf 90 73 Slurrv 340 25 8500 12,49651 HAWKS BEARD/129TH HAWKS BEA ST CULOE•SA Local 90 73 Slurry 200 25 5000 $1,46853 HAWKS BEARD 135 TH AV 131 ST AV Lou: 90 73 Slurry 545 25 21125 16.204 55 HAWKS BEARD 130 TH AV SUMMER LA DR Local 90 73 Sturry 443 25 11015 13,752 80 HAZELHILL HAZELTREE TR DUCHILLY CT Local 100 83 Slurry 686 25 17150 15.03707 HAZELWOOD SPRINGWOO DR SPRINGY/00 DR LouI 87 70 Sturry 1470 25 15650 110.47065 HAZELTREE BULL MOUN RD HAZELHILL OR Lou: 83 66 Slurry 560 25 14000 $4.111 89 HERMOSO BEVELAND RD 72 NO AV Local 90 73 Slurry 1100 25 27500 18.07694 GH TOR CITY LIMI BENCHVIEW TR Local 90 73 Slurry 280 25 7000 2.055 95 HI 15500 $5.43357 HIGHLAND CUL•DE-SA SUMMERFIE DR LO 80 63 Slurry 740 25 HIGHLAND SUMMERFIE DR 100 TH AV local 93 76 Slurry 3760 25 91000 127,608 /l HILL OMARA ST ASH AV Local 95 78 Slurry 1645 2! 41125 1t 2,07869 HILU92ND CUL•DE*SA HILL ST foul 85 68 Sturry 185 25 4625 $1.35839 HILLVIEW OMARA ST CUL•DE.SA Local 88 71 Slurry 375 25 9375 $2.75350 HOODVIEW END KABLE ST Local 90 73 Slurry 1280 25 32000 $9,39862 HORIZON CITY LIMI ASCENSION DR Lou: 90 73 Slurry 520 25 13000 $3.81519 INEZ 103 RD AV 100 TH AV Loral 90 73 Slurry 790 25 19750 $5.50071 INEZ CUL•DE-SA 87 TH CT Local 95 78 Slurry 1660 25 41500 $12,188 83 JAMES HOWARD DR END Local 77 60 slurry 460 25 11500 (3.37763 JAMES 124 TH AV 121 ST AV Local Be 71 Slurry 1250 15 31250 $9.17834 JOHNSON JOHNSON ST CULDESA Local 90 73 Slurry 211 27 5775 $1.54930 JOHNSON END JOHNSON CT Local 85 68 Slurry 260 25 6500 $1.90909 JOHNSON JOHNSON CT GRANT AV Local 85 68 Slurry 1135 25 28875 $5,48076 KAREN 127 TH AV 125 TH AV Loral 90 73 Slurry 560 25 14000 $4.111 89 KATHERINE 128TH AV CULOE•SA Local 90 73 Slurry 515 25 20375 15.984 27 KATHERINE 125 TH AV 116 TH AV Loral 97 80 Slurrv 2535 25 67375 $18,617 66 KATHERINE KAROL Ci TIGARD ST Local BS 68 Slurry 253 15 6325 $1.1157 70 KENT GREENLAND DR CULDE-SA Local 85 68 Slum 375 25 9775 $2.75360 KENT 108 TH AV 103 RD AV Local 93 76 Slurry 1250 23 31250 (9.178 74 KERI 104 TH AV CULDE•SA Luca) 90 73 Slurrv 235 25 5575 $1,725 E3 KIMBERLY SERENA CT 98 TH AV Local 87 70 Slurry 715 25 17875 $5.25001 KROESE BO TH PL END Local 86 69 Slurry 150 25 3750 $1.10140 LAKEVIEW WINTERLAK OR SHOREVIEW PL Local 85 68 Slurry 335 25 8375 %2.45979 LANDMARK CUL•DE•SA 72 NO AV Local 83 66 Slurry 730 25 18750 1!.50701 LAUREN ESSEX DR 135 TH AV Local 90 73 Sturry 755 25 18875 $5,513 71 LAURMOUNT CUL.DE•S.A SHORE DR Local 90 73 Slurry 405 25 10125 $2.973 75 LEWIS CUL•DE•SA 95 TH AV Local 81 64 Slurry 420 25 10500 $3.083 92 LOCUST 72 NO AV END Local 90 73 Slurry 6111 25 15375 $4.515 74 LOLA SHADY PL CULDE.SA Local 92 75 Slurry 620 25 15500 14.511245 LYNN 121 ST AV 116 TH AV Local 85 68 Slurry 982 25 24850 17,210 50 MARILYN CUL•DESA 96 TH AV Luca: 83 66 Slurry 270 25 6750 11.98252 MARION 124 TH AV 121 ST AV Local 87 70 Slurrv 1270 25 31750 ,9.375 ID MARTHA COPPER CR OR COPPER CR DR Local 85 68 Slurry 175 25 4375 $1,264 97 MARTHA 93 RD AV 92 ND AV Local 83 66 Slum 410 25 10250 $3,01049 MATTHEW PARK END 81 ST AV Local 90 73 Slurry 350 25 5750 $2.569 93 MCFARLANO VISTA VIE CT CLOUD CT Local 100 83 Slurry 935 25 23375 $6.565 AO MCFARLAND CLOUD CT BULL MOUN RD Local 88 71 Slurrv 771 25 19275 $5.661 2D MCKENZIE GRANT AV PACIFIC HW Local 85 68 Sturry 715 25 17075 15,25001 MEADOWWOOD WOODCREST AV WOODCREST AV 1- 90 73 Slurry 595 25 14875 $4.36859 MILLEN MILLEN/94 CT 93 RD AV Local 83 66 Slurry 315 25 7875 $2.31294 MILLVIEW SUMMERCRE DR CULDE•SA Lou: 83 66 Slurry 875 25 21875 16,47483 MIRA 130 TH AV CULOE-SA Local 90 73 Slurry 515 25 12875 17.78147 MORNING HILL WESTBURY TR 135 TH AV Local 85 68 Slurry 620 25 15500 $4.552 411 MOUNTAIN RIDGE 234 TH AV CUL-DE•SA 1.- 87 10 Slurry 495 25 12375 $3,634 62 MOUNTAIN VIEW END END Local 100 83 Slurry 1020 25 25500 1748952 MURDOCK 109 TN AV 106 TH AV Local 85 68 Slurry 710 25 17750 (5.213 29 MURDOCK 97 TH AV END Local 90 73 Slum 465 25 11625 17,414 34 OAK 90 TH AV 87 TH AV Local 85 68 Slur". 1165 25 29125 $8.53421 OAK MEADOW/92ND END OAK MEADO UN Local 85 68 Slum 100 25 250" $734 27 OAK MEADOW/91ST END OAK MEADO LN Local 85 68 Slurry 100 25 2500 $734 27 OAK MFJIDOW ALDERBR00 DR ALDERBR00 CR Local 90 73 Slurry 1150 25 28750 $8.44107 OAKHILL ALDER13ROD DR CULDE•SA Local 90 73 Slurry 915 25 22875 16.71854 OAKS 98TH AV END Local 95 78 Slum 330 25 8250 12.12708 PEMBROOK 100 TH AV 97 TH AV Local 88 71 Sturry 960 25 24000 $7,1245 96 PENN CUL.",SA 115 TH AV Laval 85 68 Slurry 425 25 10625 $3.12063 P] NEBROOK CUL•DE'SA 89 TH AV Lou, 80 63 Slurry 310 25 7750 $2.27623 REDWOOD 72 NO AV CUL•DE•SA Lxal 95 78 Sturry 865 25 21625 $6,35141 REILING 92 NO AV 88 TH AV Local 93 76 Slurry 1255 25 31375 $9,215 05 SANDBURG 72 NO AV 72 NO AV Lou: 90 73 Slurry 630 25 15750 $4.625 88 SCHECKLA REILING ST 89 TH CT Local 90 73 Slurry 480 25 12000 17.52118 SCHOLLWDOD CUL•DE-SA HAZELWOOD LP Local 87 70 Slurry 317 25 7925 12.32763 SERENA GRIMSON CT WOODCREST AV LOUI 83 66 Slurry 690 25 17250 $5,06611 SHADY SHADY LN SHADYLN Local 91 74 Sturry 1155 25 28875 $848078 SHADY 74 TH AV SHADY LN Local 90 73 Slurry 370 25 9250 $271679 SHADY SHADY CT CUL•DE•SA Local 77 60 Slurrv 210 25 5250 11,541.96 SHEFFIELD BRITTANY DR BRITTANY OR Lo f 90 73 Slurry 1040 25 26000 $7,63633 SHORE MORNINGH DR WINTERLAK DR Lx I 90 73 Slum 1325 25 33125 $9,72904 SHOREVIEW LAKEVIEW TE CUL•DE•SA Local 85 68 Slum 620 25 15500 $4,55245 SNOW BRUSH CUL•DE•SA SUMMER LA OR Local 92 75 Slum 530 25 23250 $3.09161 SPRINGWOOD CUL•DE"SA 121 ST AV Local 65 68 Slum 275 25 6875 $2.01923 SPRUCE 74 TH AV 71 ST AV Local 84 61 Slum 970 25 24250 17.122 39 STARDUST NORTHVIEW DR L,DEN DR Local 90 73 Slurry 280 25 7000 $2.051197 STARVIEW END 130 TH AV Local 90 73 Slum 1733 25 43325 $12.724 64 STEVE 83 RD AV 83 RD AV Lout 91 74 Slurry 255 25 6375 $1.872.38 STRATFORD 87 TH AV CULDE•SA Lou: 86 69 Slurry 430 25 10750 $7,157.35 STRATFORD 88 TH AV 88 TH AV Local 90 73 Slurry 1020 25 25500 $7,489 52 SUMMERCREST 121 ST AV TIGARD DR Local 85 68 Slurry 555 25 13875 54,07518 SUMMER LAKE SNOW BRUS CT SCHOLLS F RD Local 90 73 Slum 17805 25 44500 $13.06995 SUMMER SUMMERCRE OR 121 ST AV Local 85 68 Slurry 890 25 22250 $6.53498 SWENDON ASHBURY LN ASHBURYLN Local 90 73 Slurry 1392 25 34800 SI0.22099 TALLWOOD BLUESTEM UN ASHBURY LN Local 100 83 Slurry 1225 25 30625 18.994 99,477 TANGELA END 92 NO AV Local 90 73 Slurry 120 25 3000 $88112 Sub Tola, ;627.1145 51 EminaarinA d, Ad.1-10%, $62,75185 Slurry Cost.$0.293/s.l. Total Accumutat4d R4sarv1 Tat., $513,476.87 APPENDIX A-2 P&p A.2.8 rv ro17,rola Road Name Limits From To Claadflcalon IM PCI roll PCI Mummand Milan ►rLfanllh Width Ana (a.1.) Cost TIGARD TIEDEMAN AV PACIFIC HW N.[Ah•d houla 100 12 haconNntllon 3191 30 95730 $685,839.76 TIGARD PACIFIC HW MAIN ST Local 91 if Asco.111. ll4n 158 30 4740 $33,958.85 TIMOTHY CUL•OE•SA 115 TH AV Local 61 65 flurry 764 25 6600 51,996.62 TIPPITT END 121 ST AV local 91 71 flurrv 600 25 15000 $4,537.77 TITAN 108 TH AV 104 TH AV Local 91 76 slurry 1045 25 26125 $7,903.28 TWIN PARK TIGARD ST CUL•DlSA local 80 6P flurry 360 35 9000 $2.722.66 VENUS GENESIS LP CUL•Of-SA Local /1 s9 flurrv 470 25 11750 $3,554.59 VIEW VIEW TR CUL.DE•SA Local 90 17 Ilurry 190 25 4750 $1.436.96 VIEW CUL•DE•SA CUL•DE•4A Local as 70 flurry 940 25 23500 57,109.17 VIEW 100 TH AV 94 TH CT Local 100 87 6lurrv silo 25 27750 $8,394.87 VIEW 93 RD AV 92 ND AV Local f/ 69 flurry 525 25 13125 $3,970.55 VIEWCREST CUL•OE•SA ASPINE RI OR local as 67 flurrv 545 25 13625 $4,121.81 VEWMOUNT 114 TH AV CUL•DE•SA Local 91 71 slurrv 605 25 15125 $4.575.58 VILLAGE GLENN FpEWING ST ASH AV Lad 01 76 flurry 1290 Z! 32250 $9,758.20 VILLAGE PARK 129TH PL 128 TH AV Lou( 90 12 flurrv 360 25 9000 $2,722.66 VISTA VIEW MCfARIAND BL CUUOE•SA local 81 67 flurry 270 21 6750 $2.042.00 WESTRIDGE ESSEX DR 135 TH AV Local 90 72 Slurry e70 25 21750 $6,579.77 WILDWOOD/118TH WILDWOOD ST CUL•DE•SA Local 99 61 alurry 156 25 3950 $3,194.95 WILDWOOD WILDWOOD ST CUL•DE•SA Local 90 12 flurry 260 25 6500 $1,966.37 WILDWOOD VISTA VIE CT MCFARLAND BL Local 93 70 flurrv 1485 25 37125 $11.230.98 WILLOWWOOD COTTONWOO LN CUL•DE•SA local se M fturrY 470 25 11750 $3,554.59 WILLS CUL•DESA 127 TN AV Local a0 62 flurry 370 25 9230 $2.79829 MILTON LIDEN OR WALNUT ST Local W 77 Slum 150 25 3750 $1,134.44 WINDSOR 306 TH AV CUI.DE•SA Local el a9 W.", 340 25 8500 $2,571.40 WINDSONG WALNUT IN NORTHVIEW DR Local e9 67 flurry 1070 25 26750 48.09236 WINDSOR 106 TH AV CUL•DE•SA Local 90 77 flurry 440 25 11000 $3,327.70 WOOD.. CUL•DE•SA 115 TH AV Local 95 67 flurrv 415 25 10375 $3.138.62 103RD MURDOCK ST MCDONALD ST Local 95 77 flwrr 2020 25 505M $15.277.16 104TH KENT ST KNUCKLE Local 90 11 flurry 1115 25 27875 $8,432.69 304 TH PICKS WY DURHAM RO Local 8s .l flurry ♦10 25 10750 $3,252.07 100 TH END KABLE ST Local 15 a/ flurrv 225 25 5625 51,701.66 104 TH MCDONALD ST HILLVIEW ST Lad 02 74 Llurrv 400 25 10000 $3,025.18 106TH DEL MONTE OR CANTERBUR IN Local 95 77 flurry 955 25 23875 $7,222.62 106TH WINDSORCT CUL.DE-SA Local 00 )7 flurrv 305 25 7625 $2,306.70 106TH CITY LIMI CLYDESDAL PL Local 65 6) flurry 150 25 3750 $1.134.44 106TH CLYDESDAL PL CLYDESDAL CT Local 1) 0A flurry 365 25 9125 $2,760.48 106TH CLYDESDAL CT TIEOEMAN AV Local 15 1/ flurry 365 71 4121 $1,247.89 107TH CUUDE•SA FONNER ST Local 94 66 flurry 1760 25 31500 $9.52932 109 TH HIGHLAND DR NAEVE ST Local as 81 flurrv 395 25 9875 $2,987.36 109TH NAEVE ST END Local W M flurry 662 Z5 16330 $5,006.67 309 TH NORTH DAK ST BLACK DIA WY Local 100 ft Slurry 1055 25 26]75 $7,978.91 109TH CUL•DE-SA CHATEAU LN lad 85 87 f/unr "a 25 3500 $1,058.81 111TH FONNER ST CUL•DESA Local 6s 6o flurry 610 75 15250 44,613.40 112TH PACIFIC 7fW OAARDE ST Local .1 AJ flurry 1465 75 ))125 $11,230.98 113TH CITY LIMI DURHAM RD Local !I 63 flurry 660 7! 16500 $4,991.55 113 TH CUL.DE•SA DAWNS CT lad 62 64 $lurrY 190 25 9750 52,949.55 113 TH DAWNS CT TIGARD ST Lout M0 81 Olurry A10 2,5 15750 $4,76466 114TH VIEWMOUNTLN FAIRHAVEN ST Local 07 74 flurry 960 23 24500 $7,411.69 114 TH SUMMERFIE DR CULDE•SA Local 65 6J flurry 140 25 {1500 $2,57140 114 TH 115 TH AV WALNUT ST Local a5 e/ fllrrry 890 25 22250 SA.731.02 116TH WALNUT ST ANNST Local 0A slwry 160 25 9500 $2,873.92 I IS TH LYNN ST KATHERINE 57 Local 05 61 flurry 650 75 16250 $4,915.92 119TH NORTH DAK ST MANZANITA ST Local 90 17 slurry 616 73 16950 $5,12268 122ND WALNUT ST END Loc.[ 90 If flurry 150 25 8750 $2.647.03 124TH MARION ST END Local 91 10 fNnv M1 31 17135 55,18062 124TH WALNUT ST BROOK CT Loa: 91 71 flurry 1060 25 26500 $8.016.73 124 TH NORTH DAN ST CUL•DE•SA Lad 00 77 flung 770 75 6160 $2.04200 125 TH KAREN ST KATHERINE ST Local 90 !2 slurry 600 25 17000 $4,537.77 125 TH CUL•DE•SA WINTERLAK DR Local 6P. 6J slurry JOS 25 17625 55.331.88 129 TH BULL MOON RD BIRDSVIEW ST Local 1! 67 flurrv 760 75 9500 $2,87392 129TH CUL.DE•SA FALCON RI CT Local 90 72 slurry 140 29 6000 31.81511 129TH CUL•DESA WINTERLAK CT Local 90 71 flurry 609 25 17375 5525621 129TH CUL•DESA WINTERLAK CT Local 90 77 flurrv .9s JS 17]75 4!,25625 133 RD END 132 ND AV Local 90 72 flurrv 600 is 15000 $4,537.17 133RD 132 ND AV BENISH ST Loa: as a7 flurry 1100 25 28750 $9,697.39 133RD SHEFFIELD CR END Lord 90 17 frurry 115 21 2.15 386474 133 RD CUL.DE•SA BRITTANY DR Local 90 7J flurry 750 11 6750 $1,89074 134TH 133 RD AV BENISH ST last 85 67 Slurry MO 21 16000 $4.51029 134 TH 133 RD AV MOUNTAIN CT Lou: 90 77 slurry 1405 75 3512! $10,625 94 134TH SHEFFIELD CA CUL•DE-SA Local 90 72 flurry 160 25 4500 $1.36133 136TH CUL•DE-SA WESTRIDGE TE Local 90 77 slurry 615 75 15375 $4,802.47 66TH CULDE•SA OAK ST Local 100 82 slurry 17s 25 4] 15 $1,323.52 69TH CLINTON ST ATLANTA ST Local 97 79 blurry 168 25 21625 $654195 69TH PINE ST OAK ST Lcc91 100 82 slur' 560 25 14000 44,23525 69 TH CUL•DE•SA TAYLORS F RD Local 100 e2 slunv 1100 25 42500 $12.857.01 70TH OAK S1 ' END Local 100 8291urry 515 25 12575 3.09492 70 TH 69 TH AV TAYLORS F RD Local 100 82 Blur' 1470 25 35500 $10.739.39 76TH DURHAM RD BOND ST Local 100 .2 slurry 690 75 17250 $5,21843 76TH END ASHFORD ST Local IDo 82 slurry 440 25 11000 $3.32770 76TH END END Local 93 75 Slurry 260 25 7000 32,11763 76 TH SPRUCE ST SPRUCE ST Local 91 71 slurry 106 25 2650 $80167 Sub Total $1,092,977.18 E.x1re-drat & Admi-10%. $109297.72 Slurry Cost-$0.3025/s.l. Reconstruction-S7. 164/11 Total A11-1e104 Reserve Total $111.201.97 FY 2018.7019 Road Name Limits From To Clasalpcalon 1M9 PCI rots PCI Aecommsnd Action ►rUanAlh Width Area p.l.) Cost 79TH PFAFFLE ST THORN ST Local 100 01 81u Ff 1745 25 31125 $9.69835 80TH BOND ST CHURCHILLWY Local 100 al blurry 290 25 7250 52,25905 BOTH END END Lwl 100 at slurry 440 25 11000 $3.42753 BOTH FANNO CRE DR CUL•DE•SA Local 91 74 Slurry 910 25 12750 $3,97282 80 TH CUL.DE•SA FANNO CRE DR Local 95 76 Slur' 770 ZS 19375 56,037 12 81 ST ASHFORD ST ADS ST Local 100 al Slurry IOUs 21 25125 $7,828 79 81 ST ROSS ST SONS TA RD Local 100 61 Slurry 1 e.0 75 41000 $14,644 89 81 ST CUL•DE•SA BOND ST Local 95 76 Slurry 291 21 1375 $2,29800 82 ND PATTIE LN LANGTREE ST Local 100 .1 Slurry 666 21 13877 14,323 36 82 ND PFAFFLE ST END Local 100 .l Slurry 810 25 20250 $6,]09 77 82 ND STEVE ST CUL•DE•SA Local 100 al Slurry 317 25 7925 $2,46938 82 ND ASHFORD ST END Local 91 7. Slurry 600 25 15000 $4,67390 83 RD END LAMANCHA CT Local 93 74 Slurry 127 25 ] 125 $97373 83 RD LAMANCHA CT LAMANCHA CT Local 93 74 Slurry 250 25 6250 51.947 46 83 RD MURLIOCK ST CUL•DE•SA Loc.[ 93 74 Slurry 415 15 10]75 $],232 7. 83 RD CUL.DE•SA BONITA RD Local 100 01 Slurry s.0 25 14500 $4.51811 84 TH IANGTREE ST ASHFORD ST Lou: 100 81 Slurry 146 25 6125 111,90a 51 84TH KENTON DR END Local 100 .1 Slurry 110 25 3750 $1,16848 94 TH MURDOCK ST CUL•DE•SA local 95 76 Slurry 410 Z! 10250 13,193 53 84TH BONAVENTU IN CUL.DE•SA Loca l 100 al Slurry 190 25 4750 $1,46007 85TH CITY LIMI CITY LIMI Local 95 76 Slurry 605 27 15129 $4,71205 87TH DURHAM RD HAMLET ST Local 95 76 Slurry 920 25 23000 17,16665 87TH END BELLFLOWE LN Local 100 81 Slurry 76 25 1900 $59203 87 TH OAK ST LOCUST ST Local 100 81 Slurry 780 25 19500 $6.07607 as TH DURHAM RD SATTLER ST Local 100 at slurry 1802 25 45010 $14,03729 APPENDIX M2 Page A•2.9 88TH END END Local 100 81 Slurry 355 25 6515 $2.765.39 90TH END END Local 100 81 Slurry 375 25 6]73 32.60940 90TH OAK ST LOCUST ST Local 100 at Slurry 1190 25 29750 19.269.91 91 ST LINCOLN AV GREENBURG RE Local 100 01 Slurry 760 23 19000 $5,920 28 92ND SATTLER ST INEZ ST Local 100 81 Slurry 1615 25 45375 $14,178.55 92 NO MINEZ AP ST VIEW TR Local 93 74 Slurry 225 25 5625 $1,752.71 92 NO APLELEAF ST LOCUST ST Local 100 at Slurry 370 25 9250 $2.882.24 93 RD MARTHA ST CUL•DE-SA Lout 95 76 Slurry 264 25 6600 $2.056.52 94 TH W:ESIDE DR END Local 100 81 Slurry 270 25 6750 $2,103.26 94 TH GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RE Lout 93 74 Slurry 480 25 12000 $3,779 l2 95TH COMMERCIA ST GREENBURG RE Local 100 81 Slurry 1535 25 383'/5 $11,95740 97 TH LAKESIDE DR CUL.DE-SA Lou: 95 76 Slurry 100 25 2500 (770.98 97TH OAKS UN LUL•DE•SA Loca l 95 76 Slurry 120 25 3000 $934.78 97TH CUL•DE•SA ELROSE ST Local 100 81 Slurry 316 25 7900 32.461.59 ALFRED 69 TH AV VENTURA CT Local 100 81 Slurry 650 25 21250 36,621 36 AMES CHANDLER DR 121 ST AV Local 97 78 Slurry 680 25 17000 $5,297.09 ASH HILL ST END Lou; 95 76 Slurry 53 25 1325 $41286 ASH COMMERCIAST COMMERCIA ST Local 100 81 Slurry 165 25 4125 $1,285.72 ASHBURY TALLWOOD DR WILTON AV Local 100 81 Slum 520 25 13000 $4.050.72 ASHFORD 84 TH AV 81 ST AV Loral 9S 76 Slurry 550 25 13750 $4,25441 ASHFORD THURSTON DR 79 TH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 210 23 5250 $1,63587 AVON 87 TH AV HALL BL Local 94 75 Slurry 620 25 15500 $4,829.70 BAMBI 116 TH AV 115 TH AV Local 97 78 Slurry 210 2S 5250 $1,63587 BARBARA 74 TH AV VENTURA CT Lou: 100 81 Slurry 1215 25 30375 $9.46465 BELL 127 TH AV CULDE-SA Local 100 81 Slurry 565 25 14125 $4.401 26 BELLFLOWER END REILING ST Local 100 61 Slurry It91 25 29775 $9.277.70 BENCHVEW CULDE.SA BENCHVIEWTR Local 100 at Slurry 264 25 6600 $2,056.52 BLACK DIAMOND 111 TH AV PONDEROSA PL Local 100 81 Slurry 795 25 19875 $6,192.92 BLACK DIAMOND PONDEROSA PL 106 TH AV Loca; 100 81 Slurry 670 25 16750 $5,219.19 BONANZA RIVERWOOD UN RIVERWOOD LN Local 100 at Slurry 700 25 17500 SS 452.89 SONAVE14TURE END 82 ND AV Local 100 81 Slurry 630 25 15750 $4,907.60 BOND 81 5T CT 79 TH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 860 25 21500 $6.699.26 BOND 79 TH AV 76 TH AV Local 100 61 Slurry 665 25 16625 $5,180.24 BOUNEFF MORNING H DR 131 ST AV Loca; 97 78 Slurry 485 25 12123 $3,778.07 BRAEBURN END REILING ST Local 100 81 Slurry 720 2S 18125 $5,647.63 COLONY COLONY OR CULDESA Local 100 81 Slurry 290 25 7250 $2,259.05 BURNHAM CULDE•SA HILL ST Local 95 76 Slurry 220 25 5500 51.713.76 CARMEN CITY LIMI 116 TH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 115 25 2875 1895 83 CENTER 95 TH AV 95 TH AV Local 100 81 Slurry 280 25 7000 $2.181.15 CHANDLER AMES RD 121 ST AV Local 97 78 Slurry 950 25 23750 $7,400.35 CHELSEA OMA ST OMARA ST Local 94 75 Slurry 1200 25 30000 19.347.80 CHERRY 72 NDRAAV 74 TH AV Local 95 76 Slur" 340 25 BS00 $2,648.54 C14ICKORY CUL•DE•SA SUMMER LA CT Local 94 75 Slurry 335 25 8375 $2,609.60 CHURCHILL 80 TH AV CULDE.SA Local 100 01 Slurry 480 25 12000 $3.73912 CLINTON 70 TH AV 69 TH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 264 25 6600 $2.056.52 CORAL GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RE Local 100 81 Slurry 450 23 11250 $3,505 43 CuRTL ND END HO NAME OR Local 100 81 Slurry 100 25 2500 $77898 DAWN CUL•DE•SA 92 NO AV Local 100 81 Slurry 220 25 5500 $1,71376 DEL MONTE 105TH AV 103 RD AV Local 100 81 Slurry 720 25 18000 $5,606.68 DERRY DELL PARK ST PARK ST Local 94 75 Slurry 430 25 10750 53,349.63 DOVER CULDE SA 100 TH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 3D0 25 7500 $2.33695 ELISE CULDE:SA 303 RD AV Lora; 100 81 Slurry 230 25 5750 51.79166 ELMHURST 69 TH AV 68 TH PW LccH 97 78 Slurry 275 25 6875 $2.14221 ELROSE 98 TH AV 97 TH AV Local 100 81 Slurry 485 25 12125 $3,778 07 ERROL END 116 TH AV Local 97 78 Slurry 100 25 2500 $778.98 ERROL END FONNER ST Local 100 BI Slurry 1450 25 36250 $11,295.26 ESCHMAN WINTERLAK CT HAWKS BEA ST Local 100 at Slurry 375 25 9375 $2.921.19 EYEBROW STRATFORD LP END Local 95 76 Slurry 130 25 3250 $1.01268 FAIRHAVEN 115 TH AV CUL•DE•SA Loch 95 76 Slurry 910 25 22750 $7.08875 FARHAVEN 110 TH AV FAIRHAVEN ST Local 93 74 Slurry 1190 25 29750 39.269 91 FERN END JENSHIRE LN Local 100 81 Slurry 1260 25 31500 $9,81519 FIR 72 ND AV 72 NO AV Loc.; 100 81 Slurry 235 25 5875 $1,83061 FR 74 TH AV FIR LP Local 100 BI Slum 551 25 13775 $4,292.20 FRANKLIN 69 TH AV 68 TH AV Local 100 81 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1,791.66 FREWING PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Local 95 76 Slurry 686 25 17150 55.343.83 GARDEN GARDEN PL PACIFIC MW Local 100 81 Slurry 739 25 18475 $5,76669 GENESIS 115 TH AV AMBIANCE PL Local IDD 81 Slurry 610 25 15250 $4.75190 GENESS I TYLIMI 115 TH AV Local 100 81 Slurry 30 25 750 1233.70 GENEVA 11 TH AV 109 TH AV Local 100 81 Slurry 515 25 12875 $4,011.77 GENTLEWDODS ASHFORD ST 97 TH AV Local 93 74 Slurry 740 25 IBSW $5,76448 GRAVENSTIEN END NO NAME OR Loca: 100 81 Slurry 100 25 2500 $778.98 GREENSWARD 90 TH AV 86 TH AV Local 100 81 Slurry 1105 25 27625 18,607.77 HAMLET STRATFORD LP HALL BL Local 100 61 Slurry 1470 25 36750 $11,45106 HAWKS BEARD 131 ST PL 130 TH AV Local 97 78 Slum 490 25 12250 $3,817.02 HEIDI CULDE A 92 NO AV Local 100 81 Slurry 185 25 4625 51,441.12 HILL CULDE:SSA HILL ST ' Local 95 76 Slurry 215 25 5375 51.67481 HLLVIEW/103RD CULDE•SA HILLVIEW ST Lcc.l 93 74 Slurry 160 25 4000 11,246.37 HILLVIEW 104 TH AV ASH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 992 25 24800 $7,727.32 NEZ 100 TH AV END Local 95 76 Slurry 470 25 11750 $3. 66422 INEZ 92 NO AY ENO Local 93 74 Slurry 265 25 6625 $2.064 31 JAHZEN CUL•DE•SA 98 TH CT Local 100 81 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1,791.66 JEFFERSON LOCUST ST LOCUST ST Local 100 at Slum 200 25 5000 $1,557.97 JENNA ESSEX DR CUL•DE•SA Local 97 78 Slum 390 25 9750 $3,036.04 JOHNSON 106 TH AV END Local 100 81 Slurry 365 25 9125 $2.843.29 KABLE CULDE-SA 72 NDAV Local 100 81 Slurry 350 25 13750 $4,28441 KAROL CUL•DE•SA KATHERINE ST Local 100 81 Slurry 317 25 7925 $2,46938 KATHERINE/123PD KATHERINE ST KATHERINE ST Local 100 81 Slurry 106 25 2650 $82572 KENT 103 RD AV CUL•DE•SA Local 100 81 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1,791.66 KENTON END ASHFORD ST Local 100 81 Slurry 1660 25 41500 $12,931.13 LADY MARION END 100 TH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 1385 25 34625 510,766 92 Sub Total $501.25044 EnginetrinR & Admin-10%. $50,126 04 Slurry Coste$0.3115/11 Total Accumulated R.- Total $359,815.49 FY 2019.2020 Road Name Limits From To Clalsincaton 1999 PCI 2019 PCI Recommend Action PrLlenath Width Area (e.l.) Coat TIEDEMAN TIGARD ST GREENBURG RE N.;Rh'd Route 95 75 -Reconstruction 1291 30 38730 $294.37203 LAKE END VILLAGE G DR Loco; 95 75 Slurry 200 25 5000 f 1,604 71 LAKESIDE 98 TH AV ALDERBR00 DR Local 100 80 Slum 1105 25 27625 38,86600 LAMANCHA CUL•DE•SA 83 RD AV , Local 95 75 Slurry 400 25 10000 $3,20941 LANDAU LANDAU ST CUL DE-SA Local 95 75 Slurry 750 25 18750 $6,01765 LANGTREE HALL BL END Local 100 80 Slum 785 25 19625 $6,29847 LANSDOWNE CUL•DE•SA TIPPITT PL Local 97 77 Slum 950 25 23750 E7,62836 LEHMAN GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RC Local 100 80 Slum 375 25 9375 $3,008 82 LESLIE CULDE-SA 92 NO AV Local 100 BO Slum 230 25 5750 $1,84541 LIDEN CHEHALEM CT WILTON AV Local 97 77 Slurry 1480 25 37000 111,874 63 LINCOLN COMMERCIAST GREENBURG RC L= 100 80 Slum 3495 25 37375 $11,99518 LINCOLN MAPLELEAF ST LOCUST ST Local 100 80 Slum 370 Z5 9250 $2.968 71 LODI END RULING ST Local 100 80 S;um 717 25 17925 111 12 87 LONDON 98 TH AV LONDON CT Local 97 77 Slurry 220 25 5500 $1,765 IB MAPLELEAF 72 NO AV 71STAV Local 100 80 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1,84541 MARCIA NORTHVIEW DR 139 TH AV Local 97 77 Slurry 390 25 9750 33.129 18 MARIE 128 TH AV CUL•DE•SA Local IDO 80 Slum 261 25 6600 $2,11821 MAZAMA NAEVE ST CUL•DE.SA Local 100 BO Slurry 215 25 5375 $1,72506 APPENDIX A-2 Pale A•2.10 MCKENZIE END PACIFIC HW Local 100 80 Slum 315 25 7875 SZ,527.41 MICHELLE ESSEX DR CUL•OE-SA Local 97 77 Slurry 670 25 16750 $3,375.77 MILLER CU4DE•SA HAMLET ST Loral MORNING HILL 131 ST AV CUL•DE•SA I.= 147 77 SS,ry 11 lurry 235 25 5875 5882.59 51,885.53 MORNING HILL CUL-DESA WILTON AV Loral 95 75 Stum 235 25 5875 51,885.53 MORNING HILL FALCON RI OR SCOTT BRI DR Local 100 80 Slurry 715 25 17875 55,736.83 MORNING HILL KATHERINE ST FALCON RI DR Local 100 80 Slum 264 25 6600 $2,118.21 MURDOCK HALL BL 83 RD AV Lou: 95 75 Stum 485 25 12125 $3,891.41 NAEVE 109 TH AV END Local 100 80 Slum 1155 25 28875 $9,267.18 NORTHVIEW WALNUT ST 1407H TE Lacal 100 80 Slum 2325 25 58125 $38,654.71 PATHFINDER CUL-DE-SA WALNUT ST Local 100 80 Slum 422 25 10550 $3,385.93 PATHFINDER CUL•DE-SA 107 TH CT Local 300 80 Stum 950 25 23750 $7,622.36 PATTI 82 NO AV END Local 300 80 Slum 155 25 ?975 $3.243.65 PICKS 103 RD AV 103 RD AV local 100 80 Slum 125 25 3125 $1,002.94 PICKS SERENA W/ CUL•DE•SA Lou[ 100 80 Stum 233 25 5275 $1,692.97 PICKS 104 TH AV 104 TH AV Laval 95 75 Slum 325 25 8125 $2,607.65 PICKS 104 TN AV CUL•DE•SA Loral 100 80 Slum 464 25 11600 $3,722.92 PONDEROSA BLACK DIA WY CUL•DE•SA Loral 100 80 slum 270 25 6750 $2,166.35 REILING BRAEBURN LN BELLFLOWE LN Local 100 80 Slum J78 25 9450 $3,032.90 RNER TUALATIN OR 7 ALATIN DR Loral 93 73 Slum 635 25 15875 $5.094.94 RIVERWOOD BONANZA WY It VERWOOD PL Local 95 75 Slurry 555 25 13875 $4,453.06 RIVERWOOD CUL-DE•SA RIVERWOOD LN Local 9S 75 Slum 150 25 3750 $1,203.53 SCOTT CUL•OE•SA 98 TH AV Local 100 80 Slurry 450 25 33250 $3.610.59 SERENA DURHAM RD CUL•DE-SA Lou[ 100 Be Slurry 790 25 19750 $6,338.59 SHADY SAREWA LN SHADY LN Loral 94 74 Slum $85 25 14625 54,693.77 SPRUCE 78 TH AV 74 TH AV Loral 95 75 Slum 805 25 20125 $6,458.94 STEVE END 83 RD AV Lou; 95 75 Slum 185 25 4625 $1,484.35 STEVE 82 NO AV 81 ST AV Local 93 73 Slurry 385 25 9625 $3.089.06 STUART 103 RD AV CUL•OE•SA Local 500 80 Slum 230 25 5750 $ 1.84SAI SUMMER LAKE/128TH CUL•DE•SA SUMMER LA DR Local 100 80 Slum 230 25 5750 31,845.41 TALLWOOD ASHBURY LN CUL•DE•SA Loral 97 77 Slurry 280 25 7000 $2.246.59 TAMAWAY ESSEX DR 136 TH PL Local 97 77 Slum 520 25 13000 $4,172.24 TERRACE TRAILS CUUDE•SA CUL•DE-SA Local 100 80 Slurry $85 25 14625 54,693.77 THORN 82NDAV 79 IN AV Local 100 80 Slum B85 25 22125 $7.100.83 THURSTON ASHFORD ST 79 TH AV local 100 80 Slum 620 25 15500 $4,974.59 TIGARD/117TH CUL.OE-SA TIGARD DR Local 100 80 Slurry 106 25 2650 $850.49 TIGARD SUMMERCRE DR 116 TH AV Lain 500 80 Slum 792 25 19800 $6,354.64 TORIAND 112 TH AV END Local 100 80 Slum 220 25 5500 $1,76518 TUALATIN 308 TH AV RIVER DR Local 93 73 Slum 825 25 20625 $6,619.41 YARNS END CHERRY OR Local 93 73 Slum 70 25 1750 $561.65 VARNS C}IERRY DR 72 NO AV Local 95 75 Slum 1675 25 41875 $13,439.42 VIEWMOUNT 115 TH AV 114 TH AV Lou' 93 73 Slurry 310 25 T750 $2,487.29 VILLAGE GLENN CUL•DE-SA VILLAGEG DR Local 95 75 Slum 200 25 5000 51,604.71 VILLAGE GLENN CUL•DE•SA VILLAGE G DR Loral 93 73 Slurry -35 25 5875 $1,805.53 VILNA 81 ST AV 80 TH AV Lout 93 73 Slurry 325 25 8125 $2,607.85 WOODR EST END END Loral 100 80 Slurry 520 25 13000 $4,172.24 WOOCRES7 RIVERWOOD LN SERENAYPI Local 93 73 Slum 3075 25 26875 $8,625.30 WOODSNIRE EDGEFIELD TE MORNINGST DR Lout 55 73 Slum 310 25 7750 $2,487.29 102 NO MCDONALD ST HILLVIEW ST Local 95 75 Slum 400 25 10000 $3,209.41 103 RD LADY MARI OR MURDOCK ST Lout 100 80 Slum 850 25 23250 $6,820.00 104 TH DURHAM RD CENTURY 0 DR Local 95 75 Slum 240 25 6000 $1,925.65 304 TH DEL MONTE DR END Local 300 80 Slurry 450 25 11250 $3,630.59 106 TH NORTH DAK ST WINDSOR CT Local 1D0 80 Slurry 890 25 22250 $7,140.94 106TH WALNUT ST CITY LIMI Loca 95 75 Slurry 485 25 12325 $3,891.41 107 TH TITAN LN CUUDE•SA Lou;l 93 73 Slum 110 25 2750 $882.59 LOB TH END NORTH DAK ST Local 100 80 Slum 485 25 12125 $3,891.41 108TH END BLACK OIA WY Lout 100 80 Slurry 495 25 12375 $3,971.65 308TH BLACK OtA WY CUL•DE•SA Local 100 80 Slum 275 25 6875 $2,206.47 109 TH ROYALITY PW MURDOCK PL Lout 100 80 Slurry 1280 25 32000 $10,270.12 109 TH MURDOCK ST CANTERSUR LN Local 100 80 Slum 795 25 19875 $6,378.71 III TH GENEVA ST BLACK DIA WY Local ]DO 80 Slum 330 25 8250 $2,647.77 111 TH END GENEVA ST Local 100 SO Slurry 264 25 6600 $2,118.21 112 TH END GAARDE ST Local 100 80 Slurry 370 25 9250 $2,968.71 112TH TOLAND ST NORTH DAK ST Local too SO Slum 375 25 9375 $3,008.82 114 TH NORTH DAK ST CUL•OE-SA Local 93 73 Slum 470 25 11750 $3,771.06 118TH GAARDE ST CUL•DE•SA Local 100 80 Slum 750 25 18750 $6,017.65 121 ST CUL•DE•SA CHANDLER DR Local 100 80 Slum 195 25 4875 $1,564.59 122ND BEEF BEND RD END Local 100 80 Slum 905 25 22625 $7,261.30 133 RD BULL MOON RD MOUNTAIN Cr Lout 100 80 Slum 910 25 22750 $7,301.41 138TH FERN ST WALNUT LN Local 97 77 Slum 535 25 13375 $4,292.59 139 IN WAU:UT LN MARCIA DR 1- 97 77 Sium 270 25 6750 $2,166.35 SCHOOL PACIFIC HVI GRANT AV Lora; 100 80 Slurry 350 25 8750 $2,808.24 MEADOW TIEOEMAN AV CUL•OE-SA Lout 100 80 Slum 570 25 14250 54,573.41 Eoalra rlnR&Admin.10%, Sub Total $676,187.86 Slurry COSt•$0.3201s.f. Reconstructfon-f7.60/0. Total 567.618.79 t Accumulated Reserve Total $416,008.85 APPENDIX A4 Pap A•2.11 I qX_ Z ti s t ° mom ao~~gR~m3A ON N IgVpNNNNNNNS1 n1NDV1 f0 QOf N 000 OOOOOOGCOO OGCCOGCGOOCGC O~ YY~~aV att~~NNbnMOyI OoNm O~bpd n ~gOyNy~~~Oq(mryyYl^b yNNCCn O.biV blflnP In~InO cd bC!~0i-n ~ ~G ~C ~G Inn bOl blOAPOi 01 n b ~f0 gx o ~o uio~yy7~i~ ~~++pp Si ~~~yyb ~pn~~~p~n~~pp q$afJg~p~~pyyp~ ~~Ngnanbp~u~nn a!y~n~ OVnnO~wN~aO~Nb~gpgpOOw.pi +NNImIl ln~1,00 L ObOGGbbOl~OC nnn G 00 G O G O------------ ~i 1y OC ^ N yS y~ ^INN~p~yyi~pp ~j SON bYf ~PNMI ~Ct mi I`OEMP-5Nf~IMV ~O b1~NP0 O00 Q YYW11 m b nn^inn~i ^iHnnn~in^i gggg NNNNNNMIV tVN fV 1~1 . yg88RR~bpRb{{RRRRRRpR RRSysRy~ppyy p~pRpR882 R 8Q YFj N NN HRlO`INIOYNNNIOV~N IOVNNNUM. R tV 4 City of Tigard Street Maintenance Fee Study Street Maintenance DU,SFACM %OF %OF ITE ITE VFP,SC, TRWWYEAR TOTAL DIRECT TOTAL RATE X0 Code Land Use Category TRIPS' UNIT CITYWIDE TRIPSIDAY 260 days TRIPS COST/YEAR COST Per Unit 210 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 9.57 /DU/DAY 10,422! 99,739 25,932,02 0 19.8% $158,071 19.8% 1.2639 220 MULTI FAMILY 6.63 /DU/DAY 6,400 42,432 11,032,320 8.4% $67,248 8.4% 0.8756 NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP Y 0.20 1,0341 120 General Heavy Industrial 1.50 /KSFIDAY 723,759 1,086 282,266 0.2% $8,981 1.1% 252 Congregate Care Facility 2.15 /DU/DAY 112 241 62 608 0.0% $1,390 0.2% 151 Mini-Warehouse 2.50 /KSF/DAY 328,090 820 213,259 0.2% $4,071 0.5% 140 Manufactudn 3.82/KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% s0 0.0% 311 All Suites Hotel 4.90 U/DAY 246 1,20 5 313,404 0.21/6 $3,053 0.4% 150 Warehousin 4.96 SF/DAY 31,898 158 41,135 0.0% $396 0.0% 864 To /Children's Superstore 4.99 /KSF/DAY 44,604 223 57,869 0.0% $553 0.1% 890 Furniture Store 5.06 KSF/DAY 279,329 1,413 367 485 0.3% $3.466 0.4% 320 Motel 5.63 /DU/DAY 447 2,517 654 319 005% $5,547 03% 130 industrial Park 6.96/KSF/DAY 3,225 614 22,450 5,837,071 4.4% $40,026 5.0% 110 General Light Industrial 6.97 IKSF/DAY 3,219,359 22,439 5,834,12 2 4.4% $39,948 5.0% 310 Hotel 8.23 /DU/DAY 364 3,160 821 683 0.6% $4,765 0.6% 560 Church 9.11 /KSF/DAY 366 651 3340 868,4 50 0.7% $4,550 0.6% 710 General Ohlce 11.01 /KSF/DAY 3.313.850 36,485 9,486,227 7.2% $41,121 5.1% 522 Junior High School 11.92 /KSF/DAY 232.605, 2,773 720.888 0.5% $2,886 0.4% 1 520 Elements School 12.031KSF/DAY 371.802 4.473 1,162 923 0.9% $4.614. 0.6% 530 High School 13.27 /KSF/DAY 231,782 3,076 799,693 0.6% $2,876 _ 0.4% 610 Hospital 16,78 SF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0 % $0 0.0% 492 Raoquet Club 17.14 /KSF/DAY 31,858 546 141,971 0.1% $395 0.0% Subtotals for Group 1 '106,40 5 27,665,373 21.1% $168,637 21.1% NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP2 20<- 100 5.5315 848 Tire Store 24.87 /KSF/DAY 67,269 1,673 434,976 0.39/6 $4,465 006% 820 Shopping Center /KSF/DAY 1825,496 50,928 13241199 10.1% $121,173 15.1% 630 Clink: 31.45 /KSF/DAY 13,111 412 107 207 0.1% $670 0.1% 862 Home Im ovement Superstore 35.05 /KSF/DAY 250,084 8,765 2,279,015 1.7% $16,600 2.1% 817 Nurse Garden Center 36.08 /KSF/DAY 13,897 501 130,364 0.1% $922 0.1% 720 Medical-Dental Office Building 36.13 /KSF/DAY 275,493 9,954 2,587,926 2.0% $18,287 2.3% 841 New Car Sales 37.50 /KSFIDAY 218,162 8,181 2,127,081 1.6% $14,481 1.8% 813 FreeStandin Discount Superstore /KSF/DAY 141.530 5.317 1,382 424 1.1% $9,395 1.2% 812 Building Materials and Lumber Store 39.71 /KSF/DAY 104 182 4.1371 1 075 637 0.8% $6,915 0.9% 814 Specialty Retail Center 40.67 /KSF/DAY 685,461 27.878 7,248.202 5.5% $45,500 5.7% 861 Discount Club 41.80 I/KSF/DAY 144,571 6,043 1,571,200 1.2% $9,596 1.2% 880 Pharmacy/Drugstore /KSF/DAY 17,202 775 201,395 042% $1,142 0.1% 863 Electronics Superstore, 45.04 /KSF/DAY 64,954 2,926 760,638 0.6% $4,312 0.5% 815 Free-Standing Discount Store SFIDAY 484,169 21,935 5,703,046 4.31/6 $32,138 4.0% 816 Hardware/Paint Store 51.29 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0% 590 Libra 54.00 /KSF/DAY 13,00S 702 182,604 041% $863 0.1% 843 Automobile Parts Sales 61.91 /KSF/DAY 42 082 2.605 677,380 '0.5% $2,793 0.3% 730 Government Olflcs 68.93 /KSF/DAY 78.983 5.444 1.415.5161 1.1% $5,243 0.7% 850 Supermarket /KSF/DAY 305,121 23.817 6,192 378 4.7% $20,253 2. 832 High-Turnover Sit Down Restaurant /KSFIDAY 129,997 10.166 2,643,233 2.0% $8,629 1.1 565 Da Care Center 79.26 /KSF/DAY 51,624 4,092 1,063,847 0.8% $3,427 0.4% 844 Gasoline/ServiceStaUOn (Avg. 844. 845.846 fVFP/DAY 130 10,490 2,727,491 2.1% $8,629 1.1% 831 Quality Restaurant 89,95 /KSF/DAY 104,767 9,424 2,450,190 1.9% $6,954 0.9% Subtotals for Group Z 216,165 56,202,948 42.8% $342,590 42.8% NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 3 100< .400) 26.7783 732 Post Office 108.19 /KSF/DAY 21,487 2,325 60016 0.5% $6,905 0.9% L 912 Bank /KSF/DAY 73,293 9,719 2,526.945 1.9% $23,552 2.9% 834 Fast-Food Restaurant SFIDAY 63,787 15,823 4,113,987 3A% $20,497 2.6% 2 851 Convenience Market 24-Hour /KSFIDAY 23,863 7,044 '1,831,474 1.4% $7,668 1.0% 444 Movie Theater With Matinee (See Report) 375.92 /SC/DAY 12 4,511 1,172,870 0.9% $3,856 0.5% 7 Subtotals for Group 3 39,422 10,249,692 768% $62,478 7.8% NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 4 SPECIAL 0.3570 411 City Park 1.59 /AC/DAY 152 242 62,837 0.0% $651 0.1% 566 Cemete 4,73 /AC/DAY 28 131 34,188 0.0% $119 0.0% 430 Goff Course 5.04 /AC/DAY 48 243 63,240 0.0% $207 0.0% Subtotals for Group 5 616 160,265 0.1% $977 0.1% TOTALS 504.779! 131,242,6191 100.0%1 $800,0001 1000% Shaded cells denote daily trips adjusted down for pass-by trips Enter Revenue Desired: 800,000 Note: DU (DWELLING UNITS), SF (SQUARE FEET), ACRE (ACRES), VFP (VEHICLE FILL POINTS), SC (SCREENS) PAGE 1 OF 1 14ENGeR1ANMBUDGET STUFFVIdjusled Street Maintenance Fee-Pass By-10.7-02x15 Appendix B-1 Date: 10!7102 City of Tigard Street Maintenance Pee Study ROW Maintenance (Citywide) DU,SF,ACRE, :G OF % OF ITE ITE VFP, SC, TRIPSNEAR TOTAL DIRECT TOTAL RATEMO Code. . Land Use Category TRIPS' UNIT CITYWIDE TRIPS/DAY 280 days TRIPS COST/YEAR COST Par Unit 210 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 9.57 IOU/DAY 10,42 2 99,739 25,932,020 19.8% 53,349 19.8% 0.4266 220 MULTI FAMILY 6.63/DU/DAY 6,400 42,432 11,032,320 8.4% $22,696 8.4% 0.2955 NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 1 0 - 20) 1 0.34 120 General Heavy Industrial 1.50 /KSF/DAY 723,759 1,086 282,266 0.2% $3,031 1.1% 252 Con ate Care Facility 2.15 /DU/DAY 112 241 62,608 0.0% $469 0.2% 151 Mini-Warehouse 2.501KSF/DAY 328,090 820 213,259 0.2% $1374 0.5% 140 Manufacture 3.82 /KSFIDAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0% 311 All Suites Hotel 4.90 /DU/DAY 246 1,205 313,404 0.2% $1,030 0.4% 150 Warehousin 4.96 /KSFIDAY 31,898 158 41,135 0.0% $134 0.0% 864 To /Children's Superstore 4.99 /KSFIDAY 44.604 223 57.869. 0.0% $187 0.1%- 890 Fumiture Store 5.06/KSFIDAY 279,329 1,413 367,485 0.3% $1.170 0.4% 320 Motel 5.63 /DU/DAY 447 2 517 654,319 0.5% $1,872 0.7% 130 Industrial Park 6.96 /KSFIDAY 3,225,614 22 450 5,837,071 4.4% $13,509 5.0% 110 General Light Industrial 6.97 IKSF/DAY 3,219,359 22,439 5,834,122 4.4% $13,482 5.0% 310 Hotel 8.23 /DU/DAY 384 3,160 821,683 0.6% $1.608 0.63'. 560 Church 9.11 /KSFIDAY 366,651 3 340 868,450 0.7% $1,536 0.6% 710 General Office _ 11.01 /KSFIDAY 3,313,850 36,485 9.486.227 7.2% 573,878 5.1% 522 Junior H h School 11.92 iKSF/DAY 232,605 2.773 720,888 0.5% $974 0.4% 520 Oementa Schr,:4 12.03 /KSF/DAY 371,802 4.473 1,162923 0.9% $1.557 0.6% 530 Hi b School 13.27 /KSF/DAY 231,762 3,076 799,693 0.6% $971 0.4% 610- Hospital 16.78 /KSFIDAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0% 492 RscquetClub 17.141KSF/DAY 31,858 546 141,971 0.19/6 $133 0.0%t Subtotals for Group 1 106,405 27 665,373 21.1% $56,915 21.1% NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2 20<-100 1.8669 848 Tire Store 24.67 /KSF/DAY 67,269 1,673 434,976 0.3% $1,507 0.6% 820 Sho in Center MSF/DAY 1,825,496 50,928 13,241,199 10.1% 140,896 15.1% 630 Clinic 31.45IKSF/DAY 13,111 412 107,207 0.1% $294 0.1% 862 Home Improvement Superstore 35.05 /KSF/DAY 250,084 8,76 5 2,279,015 1.7% $5,603 2A% 817 Nursa Garden Center 35.08 /KSFIDAY 13,897 501 130,364 0.1% $311 0.1% 720 Medical-DentalOlliceBuildin36.13IKSF/DAY 275,493 9,954 2,587,926 2.0% $6.172 2.3% 841 New Car Sales 37.50 /KSFIDAY 218,162 8,181 2,127 081 1.6% 54,887 1.8% 813 Free-Standing Discount Superstore /KSFIDAY 141,530, 6.317 1,382,424 1.1% $3,171 1.2% 812 Building Materials and Lumbar Store 39.71 IKSFIDAY 104,182 4,137 1,075,637 0.8% $2,334 0.9 814 S al Retail Center 40.67 /KSF/DAY 685,461 27,878 7,248,202 5.5% $15,356 5.7% 861 Discount Club 41.80 /KSF/DAY 144 571 6,043 1,571,200 1.2% $3,239 1.2% 880 Pha /Dru store /KSF/DAY 17,202 775 201,395 0.2% $385 0.1% 863 Electronics Superstore 45.04/KSF/DAY 64,954 2,926 760,638 0.6% $1,455 0.5% 815 FreeStandi Discount Store /KSFIDAY 484,169 21,935 5703,046 4.3% $10,847 4.0% 816 Hardware)Paint Store 51.29 /KSFIDAY 0 C 0 0.0% $0 0.0% 590 Libra 54,D0/KSF/DAY 13,006 702 182,604 0.1% $291 0.1% 843 Automobile Parts Sales 61.91 /KSFIDAY 42,082 2,605 677,380 0.5% $943 0.3% 730 Govemment Once 68,93 /KSF/DAY 78,983 5,444 1,415 516 1.1% $1,769 0.7% 850 Supermarket /KSF/DAY 305,121 23,817 6,192,378 4.7% $6,836 2.5% 832 High-Turnover Sit Dawn Restaurant /KSF/DAY 129,997 10,166 2,643.233 2.0% $2,912 1.1% 565 Da Care Center 79.26 /KSFIDAY 51624 4,092 1,063,847 0.8% $1,157 0.4% 844 Gasoline/Service Station (Avg. 844, 845,846 /VFP/DAY 130 10,490 2,727,491 2.1% $2,912 1.1% 831 Quality Restaurant 89.95 /KSFIDAY 104,767 9,424 2,450,190 1.9% $2,347 0.9% Subtotals for Group 2 216,165 56,202,948 42.8% $115,624 42.8% L NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 3 100< - 400 9.0377 732 Post Office 108.19 IKSF/DAY 21,487 2,325 604,416 0.5% $2,330 0.9% 912 Bank /KSFIDAY 73 293 9,719 2 526 945 1.9% $7,949 2.9% 834 Fast-Food Restaurant r_qggEq /KSFIDAY 63,787 15,823 4,113,987 3.1% $6,918 2.6% 651 Convenience Market (24-Hour) IWOM /KSFIDAY 23,863 7,044 1,831.474 I A % $2.588 10 444 Movie Theater With Matinee (See Report) 375.92 /SC/DAY 12 4,511 1,172,870 0.9% $1,301 -0.5% J SubiotelsforGroup 3 39,422 10,249,692 7.8% 21,086 7.8% NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 4 SPECIAL 0.1205 411 City Park 1.59IAC/DAY 152 242 62,837 0.0% $220 0.1% ( 566 Cemete 4.731AC/DAY 28 131 34,188 0,0% $40 0.0% 430 Goff Course 5.04 /AC/DAY 48 243 63,240 0.09/6 $70 0.0% Subtotals for Group 5 616 160,265 0.1 % $330 0.1% TOTALS 504,779 131,242,619 100.0% $270,000 100.0% Shaded cells denote daily trips adjusted down for pass-by trips Enter Revenue Desired: 270,000 Note: OU (DWELLING UNITS), SF (SQUARE FEET), ACRE (ACRES), VFP (VEHICLE FILL POINTS), SC (SCREENS) PAGE I.tFNG1aRtANRIBUDGET STUFFV1d)usled Street Meintoneme Fee - Pass By-10-7.02.x1s Appendix B•2 1 OF 1 Date: 1017102 City of Tigard Street Maintenance Pee Study Sidewalk Maintenance (Citywide) DU,SF,ACRE, %OF %OF ITE ITE VFP, SC, TR(PSIYFAR TOTAL DIRECT TOTAL RATEIPAO Coro LmWUse CStegory TRIPS* UNIT CITYWIDE TRIPSMAY 260dsys TRIPS COSTIYEAR COST Pot Unit 210 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 9.57 /DU/DAY 10,422 99,739 25,932,0 0 19.6% $77 783 19.8 % 0.1422 220 MULTI FAMILY 6.63 /DU/DAY 6,400 42 432 11,032 320 8.4% $7,56 5 8.4% 0.0985 NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 1 0 - 20 0.1163 120 General Heavy industrial 1.50 /KSF/DAY 723,759 1,086 282,266 0.2% $1,010 1.1% 252 Con ate Care Facility 2.15 /DU/DAY 112 241 62 608 0.0% $156 0.2% 151 Mini-Warehouse 2.50 /KSF/DAY 328,090 820 213,259 0.2% $458 0.5% 140 Manufactur(n 3.82 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0% 311 A8 Suites Hotel 4.90 /DU/DAY 246 '1,20 5 313,404 0.2% $343 0.4% 150 Warehousin 4.96 /KSF/DAY 31.898 158 41,13 5 0.0% $45 0.0% 864 To /Children's Superstore 4.99 /KSF/DAY 44.604 223 57.869. 0.0% $62 0.1% 890 Fumiture Store 5.06 /KSF/DAY 279,329 1,413 367.4851 0.3% $390 0.4% 320 Motel 5.63 /DU/DAY 447 2,517 654,319 0.5% $624 0.7% 130 Industrial Park 6.96 /KSF/DAY 3,225 614 22,450 5,837,071 4.4% $4,503 5.0% 110 General Light Industrial 6.97 IKSF/DAY 3,219,359 22,439 5,834,122 4.4% $4,494 5.0% 310 Hotel 8.23 /DU/DAY 384 3,160 821,683 0.6% $536 0.6% 560 Church 9.11 /KSF/DAY 366,651 3,340 868,450 0.7% $512 0.6% 710 General Office 11.01 /KSF/DAY 3,313,850 36,485 9,486,227 7.2% $4,626, 5.1% 522 Junior High School 11.92 /KSF/DAY 232,605, 2,773 720.888 0.5% $325 0.4% 520 Elements School 12.03 /KSF/DAY 371 802 4,473 1 162 923 0.9% $519 0.6% 530 H h Schml 13.27 /KSF/DAY 231,782 3,U7 6 799,693 0.6% $324 0.4% 610 Hospital 16.78 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0% 1492 lRacquel Club 17.14/KSF/DAY 31,858 546 141,971 0.1% $44 0.0% Subtotals for Group 1 106,405 27,G65,373 21.1% $18,972 21.1 % NOM-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2 20< - 700 0.6223 848 Tire Store 24.87 /KSF/DAY 67,269 1 673 434.976 0.3% $502 0.6% 820 Shopping Center /KSF/DAY 1,825,496 50,928 13,241 199 100*% $13,632 15.1% 630 Clinic 31.45 /KSF/DAY 13,111 412 107,207 0.1% $98 0.1% 862 Home Improvement Superstore 35.05 IKSFIDAY 250,084 8,765 2,279,015 1.7% $1,868 2.1% 817 lNurserv, Garden Center 36.08 /KSFIDAY 13,897 501 130 364 -0.1%___ $104 0.1% 720 Medical-Dental Office Building 36.13 /KSF/DAY 275,493 9,954 2,587 926 2.0% $2,057 2.3% 841 New Car Sales 37.50/KSF/DAY 218,162 8,181 2,127,081 1.6% $1629 1.8% 813 Free-Standing Discount Superstore IKSF/DAY 141,530 5,317 1,382 424 1.1% $1,057 1.2% 812 Buildin Materials and Lumber Store 39.71 /KSF/DAY 104,182 4,137 1,075 637 0.8% $778 0.9% 814 Specialty Retail Center 404 IKSFIDAY 685,461 27,878 7,248 202 5.5% $5,119 5.7% 661 Discount Club 41.80 IKSFIDAY 144,571 6,043 1,571 200 1.2% $1,060 1.2% 880 Pharmacy/Drugstore IKSFIDAY 17,202 775 201,395 0.2% $128 0.1% 663 Electronics Superstore 45.04 1KSF/DAY 64,954 2,926 760,638 0.6% $465 0.5% 815 FreeStandin Discount Store 1KSFIDAY 484,169 21,935 5703046 4.3% $3,616 4.0% 816 Hardware/PaintStore 51,221KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0% 590 Libra 54.02 tKSF/DAY 13,008 702 182,604 0.1% $97 0.1% 843 Automobile Parts Sales 61.91 IKSF/DAY 42,082 2,605 677,380 0.5% $314 0.3% 730 Government Office 68.93 /KSF/DAY 78,983 5,444 1.415.516 1.1% $590 0.7% 850 Supermarket 4 /KSF/DAY 305,121 23,817 6,192,378 4.7% $2,279 2.5% 832 H h-Tumover Sit Down Restaurant IKSF/DAY 129,997 10,166 2,643,233 2.0% $971 1.1% 565 Da Care Center 79.26/KSFtDAY 51,624 4,092 1,063,847 0.8% $386 0.4% 844 Gasoline/Service Station (Avg. 844, 845,846) lVFP/DAY 130 10,490 2,727 491 2.1% $971 1.1% 831 Quality Restaurant 89.95/KSF/DAY 104,767 9,424 2,450,190 1,9% $782 0.9% Subtotals for Group 2 216,16 5 56,202,948 42.8% $38,541 42.8% NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 3 100< - 400 3.0126 732 Post Office 708.19 /KSF/DAY 21,487 2,325 604,416 0.5% $777 0.9% Q. 912 Bank /KSF/DAY 73,293 9,719 2,526,945 1.9% $2,650 2.9% 834 Fast-Food Restaurant /KSF/DAY 63,787 15,823 4,113 987 3.1% $2,306 2.6% 851 Convenience Market 24-Hour 298 /KSF/DAY 23,863 7,044 1,831 474 1,4% $863 1.0% 444 Movie Theater With Matinee (See Report) 375.92 /SC/DAY 12 4,511 1,172,870 0.9% $434 0.5% Subtotals for Group 3 39,422 10 249,692 7.8% $7,029 7.8% +d NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 4 SPECIAL 0.0402 411 City Park 1.59 IAC/DAY 152 242 62,837 0.0% $73 0.1% ' 566 Cemetery 4.73 /AC/DAY 28 131 34,188 0.0% $13 0.0% V 430 Golf Course 5.04 1AC/DAY 48 243 63,240 0.0% $23 0.0% J SubtolalsforGroup 5 676 160,265 0.1% $110 0.1% TOTALS 504,7791 131,242,6191 100.0% $90,000 100.0% Shaded calls d+noto dally tips adjusted down for pass-by trips Enter Revenue Desired: 90,000 Note: DU (DWELLING UNITS), SF (SQUARE FEET). ACRE (ACRES), VFP (VEHICLE FILL POINTS), SC (SCREENS) PAGE 1 OF 1 N1ENG%BRrANRWUDGET STUFFWppendix 3 Adjusted Stroel Maintenance Fee-Pass By -t0.,-o2xls Appendix B-3 Date: 10n/02 City of Tigard Street Maintenance Fee Study Street Light Maintenance DU,SF,ACRE, %OF %OF ITE ITE VFP, SC, TR1P9rYEAR TOTAL DIRECT TOTAL RATEIMO Code Land UseCatspory Tmps- UNIT CfTYY DE TRIPBIDAY 280 days TRIPS COST/YEAR COST Per Unit 210 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 9.57 /DU/DAY 10,422 99,73 9 _25,932,020 19.8% $87,927 19.8% 0.7031 220 MULTI FAMILY 6.63 /DU/DAY 6,400 42,43 2 11,032 320 8.4% $37 407 8.4 % 0.4871 NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 1 0 - 20 0.5752 120 General Heavy Industrial 1.50 IKSF/DAY 723,759 1,086 282,266 0.2% $4,996 1.1% 252 Congregate Care Facility 2.15 /DU/DAY 112 241 62,608 0.0% $773 0.2% 151 Mini-Warehouse 2.50 /KSF/DAY 328,090 820 213,269 0.2% $2,265 0.5% 140 Manufacturing 3.82/KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0% 311 All Suites Hotel 4.90 /DU/DAY 246 1,205 3130404 0.2% $1,698 0.4% 150 Warehousing 4.96 IKSFIDAY 31,898 158 41,135 0.0% $220 0.0% 864 To /Children's Superstore 4.99 IKSF/DAY 44,604 223 57,869 0.0% $308 0.1% 890 Furniture Store 5.06 /KSF/DAY 279,329 1,413 367,485 0.3% $1928 0.4 320 Motel 5.63/DU/DAY 447 2.517 654,319 0.5% $3,085 0.7% 130 Industrial Park 6.96 /KSF/DAY 3,225,614 22,450 5,837,071 4.4% $22,264 5.0% 110 General Light Industrial 6.97 IKSF/DAY 3,219,259 22,439 5,834,122 4.4% $22221 5.0% 310 Hotel 8.23/DU/DAY 384 3,160 821,683 0.6% $2,650 0.6% 560 Church 9.11 /KSF/DAY 366,651 3.340 868,450 0.7% $2,531 0.6% 710 General Office 11.01 /KSF/DAY 3,313,850 36,485 9 .486,227 7.2% $22,873, 5.1% 522 Junior Hi hSchool 11.921KSF/DAY 232,605 2.773 720.888 0.5% $1,606 0.4% 520 Elements School 12.03 /KSF/DAY 371,802 4,473 1,162,923 0.9% $2,566 0.6% ,530 High School 13.27 /KSF/DAY 231,782 3,076 799,693 0.6% $1,600 0.4% 610 Hos tat 16.76 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0% 492 Racquet Club 17.14/KSF/DAY 31,658 546 141,971 0.1% $220 0.0% Subtotals for Group 1 106,405 27,665,373 21.1% $93,804 21.1% NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2 20<-100 3.0769 848 Tire Store 274 87 /0F/DAY 67,269 1,673 434,976 0.3 9/6 $2,484 0.6% 820 Shopping Center NZM /KSF/DAY 1,825,496 501928 13,241,199 10.1% $67,403 1S.1% 630 Clinic 31.451KSF/DAY 13,111 412 107,207 0.1% $484 041% 862 Home Improvement Superstore 35.05 /KSF/DAY 250,084 8,765 2,279.015 '11% $9,234 2.1% 817 Nurse Garden Center 36.08 IKSF/DAY 13,897 501 130,364 0A% $513 0.1% 720 MedIcal-Dental Office Building 36.13 /KSF/DAY 275,493 9,954 2,587,926 2.0% $10,172 243% 841 New Car Sales 37.50IKSFIDAY 218,162 8.181 2,127,081 1.6% $8,055 1.8% 813 Free-Standing Discount Superstore 7K-SF/DAY 141,530 5,317 1,382424 1.1% $5226 1.2% 812 Building Materials and Lumber Store 39.71 IKSF/DAY 104,182 4,137 1,075 637 0.8% $3,847 0.9% 814 Specialty Retail Center 40.67 /KSF/DAY 685,461 27,878 7,248,202 5.5% $25,309 S.7% 861 Discount Club 41.80 IKSF/DAY 144,571 6,043 1,571,200 1.2% $5,338 1.2% 880 Phanna /Dru store /KSF/DAY 17,202 775 201,395 0.2% $635 0.1% 863 Electronics Superstore 45.04 /KSF/DAY 64,954 2,926 760,638 06% $2,398 0.5% 815 FreeStandtn Discount Store AsF/DAY 484,169 21,935 5,703,046 4.3% $17,877 4.0% ~ 816 Hardware/Paint Store 51.29 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0% 590 Libra 54.00 IKSF/DAY 13,006 702 182,604 0,1% $480 0.1% 1 843 Autornobile Parts Sales 61.91 /KSFIDAY 42,082 2,605 677,380 0.5% $1,554 0.3% 730 Government Office 68.93 /KSF/DAY 78,983 5,444 1,415,516 1.1 % $2,916 0.7% 850 Su rmarket /KSF/DAY 305121 23,817 6,192,378 4.7% $11266 2.5% 832 High-Turnover Sit Down Restaurant /KSF/DAY 129,997 10,166 2,643,233 2.0% $4,800 1.1% 565 Da Care Center 79.26 /KSF/DAY 51,624 4,092 1,063,847 048% $1.936 0.4% 844 Gasoline/Service Station (Avg. 844, 845,646 NFP/DAY 130 10,490 R56,202,948 2.1% $4,800 1.1% 831 Quality Restaurant 89.95 IKSF/DAY 104,767 9,424 1.9% $3,668 0.9 Subtotals for Group Z 216,165 42.8% $190,565 42.8% NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 3 100< - 400 14.8954 732 Post Office 108.19 IKSFIDAY 21,487 2,325 604,416 0.5% $3,841 0.9% 912 Bank /KSF/DAY 73,293 9,719 2,526 945 1.9% $13101 2.9% 834 Fast-Food Restaurant IKSFIDAY 63,787 15,823 4 113,987 3.1% $11402 2.6% 851 Convenience Market 24-Hour /KSF/DAY 23,863 7,044 1,831,474 1.4% $1,265 1.0% 444 Movie Theater With Matinee (See Report) 375.92 /SC/DAY 12 4,511 1,172.870Y 9% $2,145 0.5% Subtotals for Group 3 39,422 10 249,692 7.89/6 $34,753 7.8% NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 4 SPECIAL 0.1986 411 City Park 1.59 /AC/DAY 152 242 62 837 0.0% $362 0.1% 566 Cemetery 4.73 /AC/DAY 28 131 34,188 0.0% $66 0.0% 430 Goff Course 5.04 /AC/DAY 48 243 63,240 0.0% $115 0.0% Subtotals for Group 5 616 160,265 0.1% $543 0.1% TOTALS 504.779 131,242,619 100.0%1 $145,000 100.0 Shaded cells denote daily trips adjusted down for pass-by trips Enter Revenue Desired: 45,000 r Note: DU (DWELLING UNITS), SF (SQUARE FEET), ACRE (ACRES), VFP (VEHICLE FILL POMTS), SC (SCREENS) PAGE 1 OF 1 IAENGWRIANRXBUDGET STUFMI)pendlx 3 Adjusted Street Mainfananae Fee- Pass By. 10.7.02.xlsAppandix B-4 Date: 10/7/02 City of Tigard Street Maintenance Fee Study Summary of Rates Street Fee ROW Fee Sidewalk Fee Streetllght RE Cods Lend Use Category Rate Rate Rate Fee Rate Totals 210 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 1.2639 0.4266 0.1422 0.7031 2.5357 220 MULTIFAMILY 0.8756 0.2955 0.0985 0.4871 1.7567 NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP J 0 - 20 1.0341 0.3490 0.1163 0.5752 2.0746 120 General Heavy Industrial 252 Congregate Care Facility 151 Mini-Warehouse 140 Manufacturing 311 All Suites Hotel 150 Warehousing 864 To /Children's Superstore 890 Furniture Store 320 Motel 130 Industrial Park 110 General Light Industrial 310 Hotel 560 Church 710 General Office 522 Junior Hi h School 520 Elements School 530 Hi h School 610 Hospital 492 Racquet Club NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2 20< - 100 5.5315 1.8669 0.6223 3.0769 11.0976 848 Tire Store 820 Shopping Center 630 Clinic 862 Home Improvement Superstore, 817 Nurse Garden Center 720 Medical-Dental Office Building 841 New Car Sales 813 Free-Standing Discount Superstore 812 Building Materials and Lumber Store 814 Specialty Retail Center 861 Discount Club 880 Pharmacy/Drugstore 863 Electronics Superstore 815 Free-Standing Discount Store 616 Hardware/Paint Store 590 Library 93 Automobile Parts Sales 730 Government Office 850 Supermarket 832 High-Turnover Sit Down Restaurant 565 Da Care Center 844 Gasoline/Service Station (Avg. 844, 845,846 831 Quality Restaurant NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 3 100< - 400 26.7783 9.0377 3.0126 14.8954 53.7239 732 Post Office 912 Bank 834 Fast-Food Restaurant 851 Convenience Market 24-Hour 444 Movie Theater With Matinee See Report) GROUP 4 SPECIAL 0.3570 0,1205 0.0402 0.1986 0.7162 411 Ci Park 566 Cemetery 430 Golf Course Page 1 of 1 Appendix C APPENDIX D Street Maintenance Fee Adjustments for Pass-By Trips October 4, 2002 Background The Street Maintenance Fee Study Report used trip generation rates that basically count the total volume of vehicles entering and exiting a given site. During our meetings with the businesses in Tigard, some asked the city to consider adjusting the trip generation information to account for "pass-by trips," and "diverted-linked trips." The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook dated March 2001 divides trips into two major categories: pass-by trips and non-pass-by trips. Non-pass-by trips are fiuther broken down into primary trips and diverted linked trips. The definitions for the trips are as follows: • Pass-by trips are trips that "are made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination without a route diversion. Pass-by trips are attracted from traffic passing the site on an adjacent street or roadway that offers direct access to the generator. Pass-by trips are not diverted from another roadway." (Source, Trip Generation Handbook, An ITE Recommended Practice, March 2001). An example of this type of trip is a stop at a gas station on the way to another destination. • Primary trips are trips made for the specific purpose of visiting the generator. The stop at the generator is the primary reasons for the trip. The trip typically goes from origin to generator and then returns to the origin. • Diverted linked trips are trips that are attracted from the traffic volume on roadways within: the vicinity of the generator but that require a diversion from that roadway to another roadway to gain access to the site. Diverted linked trips add traffic to streets adjacent to a site, but may not add traffic to the area's major travel routes. For instance, some of Costco's trips could be considered diverted linked trips from Pacific Highway. However, these trips still affect the adjacent street, namely Dartmouth Street. The Trip Generation Handbook contains data collected from various traffic engineers for various retail uses in the United States. The data comes from traffic impact reports where actual pass-by trips were studied and applied to specific uses. Hence, the data is scattered over a range of sizes for a given use. Nonetheless, ITE has compiled the data and provides the results in graphical form. Pass-by Trip Adjustments The following pass-by trip adjustments are recommended based upon data provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook, An ITE Recommended Practice, dated March 2001. Street Maintenance Fee Adjustments for Pass-By Trips Page I of 2 APPENDIX D 813 RStanding Discount Superstore 20 815 Free-Standing Discount Store 20 820 Rho in Center 35 Average for all sizes 832 Hi -Tumover Sit Down Restaurant 40 833,834 Fast Food Restaurant 50 Average includes those with and without drive-up 844, 845, Gasoline/Service Stations 50 Average includes stations 846 with markets and/or car washes 850 Supermarket 30 851 Convenience Market 24-Hour 60 880,881 Pharmacy/Drugstore 50 With or without drive-up 912 Bank 50 The uses listed in the table are those shown in the Trip Generation Handbook with more than three different traffic study data. There were other uses listed by ITE, but are not contained in the City table because of insufficient data. The uses that were not included in the City table are as follows: • Quality Restaurants Only 1 study • Tire Store Only 3 studies • Home Improvement Store Only 3 studies • Electronic Superstore Only 1 study • Furniture Store Only 3 studies. Adjusted Fees Summary of Fees for All Maintenance Elements Land Use Street ROW Sidewalk Street Light Total Category Maint. Maint. Maint. and Signal Monthly System Charge per Maint. Unit Single $1.2639 $0.4266 $0.1422 $0.7031 $2.5357 Family Multi- $0.8756 $0.2955 $0.0985 $0.4871 $1.7567 Family Group 1 $1.0341 $0.3490 $0.1163 $0.5752 $2.0746 Group 2 $5.5315 $1.8669 $0.6223 $3.0769 $11.0976 j Group 3 $26.7783 $9.0377 $3.0126 $14.8954 $53.7239 Grou 4 $0.3570 $0.1205 $0.0402 $0.1986 $0.7162 t The preceding table summarizes the rates with the credit for pass-by trips given. The exceptionally high trip rates for the fast food restaurants and convenience markets are modified and the net trip generation rates are used for calculating the fees. I:\Eng\Gus\Strect Maintenance Fee\Adjustments to the Fee\Updated Adjustments to the SMF for Pass-by Trips.doc Street Maintenance Fee Adjustments for Pass-By Trips Page 2 of 2 CITY OF TIGARD Engineering Department Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone 503-639.4171 Fax: 503-624.0752 TO: Mayor and City Councilors Bill Monahan, City Manager FROM: Gus Duenas City Engineer DATE: May 6, 2003 SUBJECT: Answers to Council Questions Regarding the Street Maintenance Fee Below are questions received on April 30, May 1 and May 2, 2003 from City Council regarding the proposed Street Maintenance Fee. Questions will be shown in bold, with the responses immediately below. Questions were received from four Council members (Mayor Griffith, Sydney Sherwood, Nick Wilson and Craig Dirksen). There were some questions that were similar in nature, so I have grouped them together before responding. • There has been no discussion from the Business Industry about their concept of assisting with the determination. Several offered to participate in an options evaluation, looking for reasonable option. Would it place us in a difficult position if we were to call together a group of Business folks and let them have a go at developing an acceptable formula? Response: Staff could certainly invite members of the business community to offer proposed solutions. Early in the process, Staff met with and contacted several businesses to inform them of the intent. So far, the only input Staff has received is a clear message that they do not want the fee. There have been no alternative fee methodologies offered by the business community. Staff could do more if Council choses to delay implementation of the fee. However, it is clear that the business community feels that more of the burden should be shifted to residential uses. Changing the percentages to have the residential users pay 50% of the anticipated fees increases the monthly rate to $4.51 for single family detached and $3.12 for multi-family units. The City of Wilsonville implemented a 50-50 split and the same could be considered by Council for the proposed fee. • Does the formula that we and other cities use specify the difference in impact of travel between the impacts of a truck versus a car on wear and damage to a ROW? Recognizing that a number of other cities have the fee, what formula do they use? Is it the same as ours? Response: The proposed methodology considers only the overall intensity of vehicle trips generated. It does not include a factor for truck traffic. This is the same methodology used by the City of Tualatin. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) suggests that the use of vehicle trip generation factors for each use is a reasonable basis for setting a fee. ITE also indicates that cities can further refine their methodology by making the following adjustments: o Distinguish among households with varying trip generation rates. The ITE manual provides trip adjustment factors for households by size, auto ownership and density. An application process would need' o be developed to simplify the administration of maintenance fee waiver or special maintenance fee. Staff has not considered this refinement to date, as it appears such an adjustment would encompass significant staff time that is not available due to recent budget cuts. o Adjust trip generation estimates for pass-by trips that are attracted to commercial properties as intermediate stops on the way to primary destinations, also for internal trips within mixed-use developments that never venture onto the public road system. Staff included adjustments for pass-by trips in the proposed methodology. o Adjust for the volume of truck traffic generated by different land uses. In terns of wear and tear on pavement, heavily loaded trucks are equivalent to hundreds or even thousands of automobiles. Accordingly, highway cost allocation studies have used equivalent single- axle loads as a basis for allocating pavement rehabilitation and maintenance costs. Some adjustment is necessary whenever trucks represent a significant portion of traffic on a jurisdiction's roads. The TSP states that truck traffic makes up at most 5% of the traffic in Tigard. This is considered normal. Factoring in truck traffic will most likely increase the participation of the major businesses rather than reducing it. C o Multiplying trip generation rates by average trip lengths to arrive at vehicle miles of travel > (VMT) generated by developed properties. On its face, VMT is a better measure of local road use than is trip ends. However, the practical problems of estimating average trip i lengths for a multitude of land uses, and breaking out travel on city streets, might be so great as to preclude this refinement. The City of Lake Oswego, in reviewing their potential fee, proposed to use VMT in setting their rates. However, Lake Oswego has a substantial amount of information available on VMT's originating from the implementation of their transportation SDC's. Tigard does not have that information available. The fee used by the City of Wilsonville considers three separate scales: intensity of trip generation, magnitude of the development measured by gross square feet of developed area, and trucks per day serving the development. Points are assigned for each of the three categories to help Answers to Council Regarding the SMF Questions Page 2 of 7 determine the fee amount. However, Wilsonville arbitrarily set the fees at 50% residential uses and 50% businesses and it is not clear just how the scales affected the establishment of the rates. • We did not ask the Grocery Representative as to why they are not protesting and suing other cities that already have the Street Maintenance Fee, or are proposing the fee. Is there a legal basis for the "implied threat" from the grocers group? If there is, why haven't they challenged the fees in other cities? Response: They have challenged the establishment of the fees in Portland and Eugene. They have not gone after cities that have already established the fees, but are trying to prevent other cities from following suit. • I thought that we had received a determination from the City Attorney as to the status of the fee as a fee and not a tax. Is this correct? If not, we need to obtain a determination. I think n more detailed discussion of the legal difference between a tax and a fee are in order since there was an implied threat that the proposed fee, if adopted, would be challenged in court. Response: The City Attorney has determined that the key is how the fee is structured. It could be structured as a fee. It is important that fee not be construed as a property tax, which would be subject to the limitations of the property tax. The City Attorney will discuss this further with you at the meeting ' on May 13, 2003. • Can we set a time limit on the Fee, say five years, or even three years, at which time we would need to re-evaluate the need and/or adjust the amount? This would give us a lift over the next few years and give the State time to get itself together. Gus mentioned at the meeting that we can look at this fee and see if we need to raise it annually. When Council talked about this, we talked about a set fee and then a sunset clause. Where did the part about raising it annually come in? Response: Council certainly has the authority to set a time limit on the fee, or a sunset clause. In previous discussions with the Council, Staff indicated that based upon the experiences of other cities like Tualatin, Wilsonville and Ashland, that the fee would be ongoing. The maintenance backlog is over $4 million dollars. It would not be practical or advisable to establish fees that bring in that much revenue. The City can address the backlog by setting up a long-term maintenance program to catch up on the backlog and continue with the maintenance needed. The $800,000 for street maintenance will be able to do just that. Staff recommends that the fee and the maintenance needs be reviewed periodically and adjusted as needed. Adjustments could be up or down depending on Answers to Council Regarding the SMF Questions Page 3 of 7 the level of revenue received and maintenance needs foreseen for the coming years. The intent of the Street Maintenance Fee is to establish a stable source of revenue for maintenance. Setting a sunset clause would be contrary to that. Staff indicated that the City of Tualatin began their fee with an intent of reviewing in later years for potential increases. Until just recently, the Tualatin fee had not been raised since inception in the 1980's, and the fee was only increased in order to cover an sidewalk repairs citywide. If Council desires, the proposed fee could be initiated with a set review period. Prior to the end of the review period, Staff could update the Council as to how the program is working. At that time, Council could decide whether or not to continue with the fee. • Are we positive this will not end up in a court battle? I want a yes or no on this. Response: No. We believe it could very well end up in "a court battle. • Why is the fee so heavily weighted on the businesses when the people who are going to benefit are the people in the neighborhoods who will have better access to getting around and also having their sidewalks and rights-of-way maintained? Can it be renegotiated? I think we need business on our side in order to do this fee. We have done virtually no public relations on it other than a few presentations. Should we loot: for more balance between residential and business? What logical formula could we devise that would throw more burden (just a little) on residential units? Perhaps we should consider this. Response: The reason it appears that businesses carry more of the burden is the fact that their trip generation is larger by proportion than the single family and multi-family uses in Tigard. The proposed methodology makes a direct correlation between the percentage of overall trips generated to the percentage of the overall fee that is paid. For reference, please review the tables provided in the March 5, 2002 staff report entitled, "Street Maintenance Fee Study Report". For instance, Appendix B-1 is the table that covers the "street maintenance" component of the fee. The 8th i column over is entitled of Total Trips". This column indicates the percentage of trips each use contributes toward the total number of trips per year (shown in the 7th column, entitled "Trips/Year, i 260 days"). So, the single family detached use in Tigard generates approximately 16.5% of the overall total trips per year. Multi-family uses generate approximately 7.0%. Together, the residential uses in Tigard make up 23.5% of the overall annual trips. The remainder of the total trips is made up by the non-residential, or commercial, uses. Next, it is important to look at the 10th column over, entitled of Total Cost". For each use listed in the table, the percentage of overall cost should correlate closely with the percentage of trips. For the non-residential groups, it is important to compare the subtotals line for each group. The Answers to Council Regarding the SMF Questions Page 4 of 7 , percentages match because Staff believed that the amount each use should pay ought to be proportionate to the amount of trips each use generates. In light of the argument from the business community that residential uses should carry more of the burden, Staff has prepared an option that would result in the residential uses carrying 50% of the burden, and the non-residential uses carrying the other 50%. The result of this "50-50 split" is as follows Land Use Category Monthly rate as Monthly rate - 50-50 currently proposed s lit Single Family Detached $2.54 $4.51 Multi-Family $1.76 $3.12 Non-residential Group 1 (0-20 trips/unit/day) $2.08 $1.45 Non-residential Group 2 < 20 - 100 trips/unit/day) $11.10 $7.73 Non-residential Group 3 <100 - 400 trips/unit/day) $53.73 $37.20 Non-residential Group 4 (Special Category) $0.72 $0.55 It is important to note that the sidewalk maintenance and the rights-of-way maintenance are options at this time. The City is not currently providing that service. In addition, the sco?,~e for each is limited to collectors and arterials only. The street maintenance and street light and traffic signal maintenance are ongoing needs that are currently addressed inadequately by the Gas Tax Fund. e I would like more specific and detailed information about the condition of the 140 miles of Tigard streets. Where are the maintenance needs and how was the maintenance backlog calculated? Response: The City has a Pavement Management System that rated the streets within the City and determined the maintenance requirements based on the ratings. The streets were last rated in 1999. At that time, many streets required slurry seals. Because of the inability to comprehensively address the maintenance requirements over the past few years, we believe many of these streets now need at least a thin overlay (1 inch or so), and some possibly a regular overlay (2 inches or more). A few of the streets now need reconstruction at much higher cost. The maintenance backlog is calculated on the maintenance requirements at this time using our current costs for asphaltic concrete installed in- place. A • Why is a maintenance fee better than a maintenance bond measure? 1 0 Response: 9 U J A fee can be implemented by Council directly without going through a voting process. An option could be a maintenance bond measure to address the backlog over a two to three year period. Council can always choose to place this issue on a ballot for voter consideration. However, the streets still need maintenance after that. The SMF provides a stable source of revenue to establish that continuing program. A bond issue would be subject to arbitrage requirements with funds typically having to be expended over a 2-3 year period. Answers to Council Regarding the SMF Questions Page 5 of 7 9 • How are we paying for street light, and traffic signal maintenance now? If this money were freed up, what would we use it for? Response: Currently, street light and traffic signal maintenance costs are funded totally by the Gas Tax Fund. The gas tax revenues are not restricted to maintenance, but can be used for a wide variety of needed street improvements. However, these funds have been used primarily for maintenance because of the large maintenance backlog and the inadequacy of the current gas tax rate to address anything beyond that. The proposed Street Maintenance Fee would supplement the gas tax and would be used in the maintenance of the street system. This would allow use of some gas tax revenues to address reconstruction, installation of crucial pedestrian connections, and other street improvement needs. In addition, a portion of the gas tax revenues can be used to repay loans, or to issue revenue bonds, for major street improvements. This option becomes available and can be considered if the Street Maintenance Fee provides that supplemental source of funds for maintenance. • What about sidewalk maintenance? in the pass, I thought that adjacent property, owners were responsible for maintaining their sidewalks. If a street tree heaves a sidewalk is it not the adjacent homeowner's responsibility? Response: Tigard's development code currently holds the property owner responsible for the sidewalks that abut their property. Therefore, if a street tree heaves the sidewalk to a point where it is considered a tripping hazard, the property owner would be responsible for repairing the sidewalk. This has never been a very comfortable standard for Staff to enforce. Why? The property owner did not have a choice about the placement of the street tree. They have very little control over what happens with the sidewalk because of that tree. The primary concern was with regard to sidewalks along collector roadways where properties back up to them. For instance, the subdivisions along Durham Road with lots that back up to the street is a good example. Property owners do not regularly maintain street frontage behind their property. It is often "out of sight, out of mind". So, when the task force began development of the proposed fee, the thought was to include an option for the City to take over maintenance of the sidewalks along collectors to alleviate the burden on property owners. • I would also like some information about landscape maintenance of arterial rights-of-way. I understand that this has been a long festering issue on Durham Road but where else does it occur in the City? How would the City propose that it be maintained if the City takes it over? Are there other options? Could the City assist the owners without assuming complete responsibility? Response: This issue is similar in nature to the sidewalk issue. This component would include maintenance of rights-of-way of collector streets where properties back up to the street and do not take vehicular access from the street. Trees, shrubs, grass and weeds will tend to go un-maintained and become a noxious vegetation issue. Therefore, the Task Force also included this component as an option for the Council to consider. 135th Avenue is another street similar to Durham Road. Answers to Council Regarding the SMF Questions Page 6 of 7 • Please address Gene McAdams' distinction between an Ordinance and a Resolution. The establishment of the fee itself would be by ordinance. The establishment of the rates would be by resolution. Fee rates are currently set by resolution because they periodically need adjustment. It would be awkward to set the rates by ordinance and have to deal with an ordinance every time a fee rate needs to be changed. Response to an item of information provided in the testimony by the Oregon Grocery Association. One of the points raised by the Oregon Grocery Association at their presentation on April 22°d concerned the ITE studies performed for supermarkets. The OGA representative stated that only two studies were done for supermarkets. In fact, the ITE Trip Generation Manual lists almost 40 studies performed over a period of years. Those studies were done on various days of the week. A few of the studies were performed for example on AM traffic on a Sunday, for example. However, the aggregate total is almost 40 studies covering a typical week period for supermarkets. The aim was to come up with an average trip generation rate for supermarkets. Because of the way we have established the categories, it would be difficult for a land use to jump from one category to another. Performing traffic studies for individual businesses would probably revise a few of the trip numbers, but most likely would not result in numbers that would jump a land use from one category to another. For example, whether a supermarket generates 80 trips per 1,000 square feet, or 60 trips per 1,000 square feet would not move them out of the Group 2 category (20< - 100 trips per 1,000 square feet). IAEng%Gus\Memorandums\Answers to Council Questions Regarding the SMF.doc 9. n a J D 9 i s Answers to Council Regarding the SMF Questions Page 7 of 7 A I A CITY OF TIGA6 Engineering Department Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-624-0752 TO: Mayor and City Councilors Bill Monahan, City Manager FROM: Gus Duenas City Engineer DATE: May 8, 2003 SUBJECT: Additional Information Regarding the Street Maintenance Fee This is to transmit additional information in response to Council questions regarding the Street Maintenance Fee. Message from Richard Gray, Strategic Projects Manager and Street Maintenance and Improvement Fee Administrator for the City of Portland This is further information on the question regarding the Oregon Grocery Association's activities opposing the fee in other cities. I have been corresponding with Richard Gray of the City of Portland, answering some of his specific questions regarding the fee. I suggested that he review the documents we have posted on the City's website regarding the fee. The attached message is his response to the comments made in the letter from Karianne Cole of Albertson's regarding their opposition to the fee. As Mr. Gray explained, OGA filed a suit, but it was never adjudicated. The primary reason for the Portland City Council's repeal of the ordinance is because it was referred to the voters, not because of the suit. Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation information regarding Supermarkets The database from ITE includes studies from the 1960s to the 1990s throughout the united States. Attached are the various studies during weekdays and weekends from which the trip generation rates are derived. For us, the ITE trip generation rates provide a means for establishing the groups and for distributing the payment of the fees among the non-residential uses. The supermarkets were initially at 111.51 average trip rate per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. After we applied the passby trip adjustments, the trip rate dropped to 78.06 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. We also consolidated the groups into four non-residential groups instead of five. The attached spreadsheet shows the categories and the rates for each specific land use. Supermarkets fall in non-residential Group 2, which is from 20 to less than 100 trips. All uses in Group 2 would pay $11.10 per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area per month. It seems unlikely that any local studies would drop the trip rate for supermarkets below 20. If anything, it may show trip rates greater than 100, which would place them in a higher paying group. Information on the 50-50 split alternative (50% by residential uses and 50% by non-residential uses) The memorandum that I sent dated May 6, 2003 responding to the Council questions provided a table that was incomplete. The following shows the full information that should have been provided in that memorandum. Land Use Category Monthly rate as Monthly rate - 50-50 _ currently proposed split Single Famil Detached $2.54 $4.51 Multi-Family $1.76 $3.12 Non-residential Group 1 0-20 trips/unit/day) $2.08 $1.45 Non-residential Group 2 < 20 - 100 trips/unit/day) $11.10 $7.73 Non-residential Group 3 <100 - 400 trips/unit/day) $53.73 $37.20 Non-residential Group 4 (Special Category) $0.72 $0.55 The Oregon Grocers Association provided some graphs which showed trip lengths for various uses. The trip lengths according to those graphs are longer for residential users. I do not know where they got that information since the ITE manual deals with trip generation rates and does not delve into trip lengths. Attached is a copy of that graph. Factoring in trip lengths may provide a basis for increasing the residential participation without resorting to an arbitrary 50-50 split. Without determining how that information should be factored into the overall calculations, it would be difficult to determine how the percentages would change. However, it does look like a relatively simple and reasonable way to increase the residential contribution using average trip lengths, assuming that the trip length information can be derived from a nationally recognized source. Attachments I:\Eng\Gus\Memorandums\Additional Information Regarding the SMF.doe Additional Information Regarding the SMF Page 2 of2 City of Tigard Street Maintenance Fee What is a Street Maintenance Fee? A Street Maintenance Fee (sometimes known as a Transportation Utility Fee, Road User Fee, or Street Utility Fee) is a monthly fee based on use of the transportation system and is collected from residences and businesses within a city's corporate limits. The fee is based on the number of trips a particular land use generates and is typically collected through the city's regular monthly sewer and water bill. It is designated for use in the maintenance and repair of the city's transportation system. Users of the road system share the costs of the corrective and preventative maintenance needed to keep the street system operating at an adequate level. What does a Street Maintenance Fee do? It protects a city's investment in the street infrastructure by providing revenue to maintain and repair the city streets. It allows the cost of the local road system to be shared among its users. Why is there a need for timely maintenance of city streets? Through timely maintenance of streets, cities are better able to provide safe roads on which people may travel. Studies have shown that pavement condition worsens at an increasing rate as the pavement gets older. Restoration of pavement near the end of its service life will typically cost 4 to 5 times more than rejuvenation performed in a timely manner. Why is the Street Maintenance Fee being considered in Tigard? The City of Tigard has approximately 140 miles of paved streets within the street system. Much of the street infrastructure is old and was not designed for heavy trucks and buses, which accelerate deterioration and greatly increase maintenance requirements. The City of Tiigard's Pavement Management System reports a preventative and corrective pavement maintenance backlog of approximately $2 million dollars as of 1999. Since then, the street system has deteriorated further and needs to be addressed as part of a long-term program of corrective L and preventative maintenance. The vast majority of the arterial, collector and neighborhood 2 streets now require either pavement overlay or more costly reconstruction. The only funding source for maintenance of the City's street system is the State Gas Tax. The revenue from the gas tax pays for street maintenance and the energy and maintenance costs for the street lights and traffic signal systems Citywide. The gas tax has not been increased in a decade and an increase does not appear likely in the foreseeable future. The revenue from the i gas tax remains relatively constant at $1.6 million dollars each year, but operating costs continue to rise. As these costs increase, the amount available from the gas tax revenues for pavement overlay and reconstruction continues to decrease. Without a significant increase, the gas tax can no longer be considered as a viable source of funding to fully address the City's street maintenance needs. It needs to be supplemented by additional funding sources for the Page I of 5 pavement overlays, pavement treatments and reconstruction work that are necessary to keep the street system functioning satisfactorily. A Street Maintenance Fee is an alternative source of funding that can be implemented to help protect the City's investment in the street infrastructure through timely maintenance and repair. The implementation of this fee was recommended to the City Council by the City's Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force, a citizen task force formed to evaluate and recommend to Council feasible alternative funding sources for street maintenance and street expansion needs. What costs would the Street Maintenance Fee cover and how much total revenue would be generated? The following are the maintenance elements included in the study together with the target amounts to be funded through the Street Maintenance Fee: • Street lv7aintenance - $800,000. This amount assumes that most of the funds collected would be used annually for street maintenance purposes with a small reserve set aside for future reconstruction of certain streets as that reconstruction becomes necessary. • Rights-of-Way Maintenance - $270,000 • Sidewalk Maintenance - $90,000 • Street Light and Traffic. Signal System Maintenance -$445,000 • Total for all four maintenance elements: $1,605,000 What is the scope of work for each of the maintenance elements? • Street Maintenance - Preventative and Corrective Maintenance of all City streets. This includes routine work such as pothole patching, crack sealing, street storm drainage maintenance, and digouts, as well as the more costly pavement overlays, slurry seals, and reconstruction of the street structural section. The City's street crews perform the routine maintenance work year-round. The long-term program for annual maintenance of the City L streets applys pavement overlays, thin-lift overlays, and slurry seals combined with street r reconstruction as needed. This program addresses arterials, collectors, neighborhood routes, and local streets as four separate categories all requiring appropriate levels of maintenance. The arterial and collector streets handle higher volumes of traffic and typically i require more attention. The neighborhood routes and local streets handle lesser volumes and would be expected to deteriorate at a slower rate. The revenue to be derived from the Street Maintenance Fee would be primarily directed to implementation of the long-term i maintenance program, and preparatory work for those projects as performed by the City's street crews. c Rights-of-Way Maintenance - Maintenance of rights-of-way between the sidewalk and the right-of-way line on collector streets with limited direct access from adjacent subdivisions. Page 2 of 5 • Sidewalk Maintenance - Maintenance of sidewalk on collector streets Citywide. This would involve replacement of sidewalk panels that pose a tripping hazard and routine maintenance of the sidewalks annually. • Street Light and Signal System Maintenance - Maintenance and power costs of all streetlights Citywide. Maintenance and power costs on all traffic signal systems and crosswalk lighting systems under City jurisdiction. How is the Street Maintenance Fee for Tigard determined? An inventory of all the existing uses on occupied parcels in the City provided the starting point for calculating the proposed Street Maintenance Fee rates for the City of Tigard. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates were then used to determine trip generation values for each use. Residential and non-residential groups were established to help generate a maintenance fee rate to be applied to each group. The trip generation rates for non- residential uses most commonly are "number of trips per thousand gross square feet of building per day." Other assignments are for those uses that do not depend upon the size of the building, such as Gasoline/Service stations, which are assigned trips per vehicular fueling positions per day. Adjustments were made to the trip generation rates to account for pass-by trips. Pass-by trips are intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination without a route diversion. The groupings take into account the net trip generation rates after factoring in pass-by trip information. The final grouping includes two residential groups and four non-residential groups summarized as follows: Single Family (Detached) • Multi-family • Group 1 0 to 20 trips per unit • Group 2 Greater than 20 to 100 trips per unit • Group 3 Greater than 100 up to 400 trips per unit • Group 4 Special group for parks, cemeteries and golf courses. What are the rates that each of the groups would be expected to pay? Summary of Fees for All Maintenance Elements Land Use Street ROW Sidewalk Street Light Total Category Maint. Maint. Maint. and Signal Monthly System Charge per Maint. Unit Single $1.2639 $0.4266 $0.1422 $0.7031 $2.5357 Family (per house Multi- $0.8756 $0.2955 $0.0985 $0.4871 $1.7567 Family (per unit Group 1 $1.0341 $0.3490 $0.1163 $0.5752 $2.0746 Group 2 $5.5315 $1.8669 $0.6223 $3.0769 $11.0976 Group 3 $26.7783 $9.0377 $3.0126 $14.8954 $53.7239 Group 4 $0.3570 $0.1205 $0.0402 $0.1986 $0.7162 Page 3 of 5 What amounts would the citizens and businesses expect to see on their utility bills? The proposed residential rates for single family houses and multi-family dwellings are $2.54 and $1.76 per month respectively. The rates for the businesses would depend on the group that each business falls into and the size of the business. Specific information can be obtained upon request from the City of Tigard. How would a Street Maintenance Fee be implemented? City Council has the authority to establish the Street Maintenance Fee and initiate that fee by Council action. The establishment of the fee would be by ordinance and the rates to be charged would be by Council resolution. Hoag soon could the Fee be established and when would amounts appear on the utility bills? City Council has decided to extend the public process for the Street Maintenance Fee. A public meeting has been scheduled for November 14, 2002 to discuss the fee with citizens and businesses. Council discussion of the results of the meeting is scheduled for the Council meeting on December 17, 2002. Any action on implementation of the fee would most likely be scheduled for early 2003. If Council does approve implementation, the effective date for the fee would be set several months after Council action. This would give the City of Tigard sufficient time to set up the fund and do the necessary work to ensure that the amounts can be incorporated on the utility bills without a glitch in the billing process. How can aI calculate my monthly payment? The monthly payment for each land use category is calculated by taking the rate established multiplied by the number of units. A single family residence and each unit in a multi-family building would pay the monthly rate shown in the fee table. For a single family residence, the rate would be $2.54 per month, and for each unit in a multi-family structure, the rate would be $1.76 per month. A land use category that falls into the non-residential groups would compute the monthly payment by multiplying the group rate that they fall into by the number of units for their particular use. Some examples are shown as follows: o Example 1: A medical-dental office building falls into non-residential group 2. The unit of ' measure is 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Assuming the office building has 10,000 square feet of gross floor area, the multiplier would be 10,000/1,000 = 10. The group rate of $11.10 multiplied by 10 equals $111.00 per month. S Example 2: A movie theater falls into non-residential group 3. If the theater has 6 screens, the monthly rate for that theater would be the group rate of $53.73 per month multiplied by the 6 screens equals $322.38 per month. • Example 3: A 24-hour convenience market falls into non-residential group 3. If the market has 5,000 square feet of gross floor area, the monthly rate for that market would be the Page 4 of 5 group rate of $53.73 per month multiplied by 5 (5,000/1,000) to produce a monthly bill of $268.65. Contact Person: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E. City Engineer City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Phone: (503) 639-4171 x2470 Fax: (503) 624-0752 Email: guus .ci.tigard.or.us I:\Eng\Gus\Street Maintenance Fee\SMF Frequently Asked Questions Updated 10-21-02.doc r 3 9 J Page 5 of 5 7~ City -of Tigard Updated Street Maintenance Backlog* Maintenance Category Total Cost Street Reconstruction $300,000 Pavement Overlay $4,200,000 TOTAL COSTS $495009000 *Updated May 2003 based on pavement overlays on all streets identified in 1999 as requiring slurry seals. I:\Eng\Gus\Street Maintenance Fee\Updated Street Maintenance Backlog - Appendix A-Ldoc i I Updated Appendix A-1 (Revised May 2003) Page 1 of 1 Cathy Wheatley - Street maintenance fee From: "Jim Thielke" <littlejo1@earthlink.net> To: <mayor@ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 5/27/03 1:00 PM Subject: Street maintenance fee Dear Mayor and Council members, This letter is to encourage you to take a positive step tonight by voting to implement a street maintenance fee. The fee should be a heavier burden on business than the residents. The majority of traffic on our city streets is generated by business not residents. Our city streets are used to get to every business in the city, or for them to get to the residents. Thus the businesses have a responsibility for the upkeep and maintenance. Business intends to generate traffic just by virtue of their advertising. Imagine how much they spend on advertising to generate the traffic. Our street situation is not improving. It is getting worse by the day and the backlog is increasing. It is only getting more costly and total reconstruction is a far greater cost to bear than maintaining. This has been hashed over for a long time and you had a task force spend months studying all aspects of maintenance and funding. Again, we encourage you to vote in favor of a street maintenance fee tonight with the greater share of the cost to be borne by business. (We lived and had a business in Tualatin and did not object to paying more as a business.) It is the council's obligation to protect the public's investment in our street system. Sincerely, Jim and Luanne Thielke 15691 SW Summerfield Lane Tigard, OR 97224 file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW) 00012.HTM 5/27/03 MONEY S71"TZ 10 11~e 7966 Robert A. Pierce & Associates FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES • P.O. Box 23818 / Tigard, Oregon 97281 Phone: 503-590-2598 Fax: 503-590-9567 Non-Portland Area Toll-Free: 1-888-558-2598 May 27, 2003 Email: wms@uinningmoneystrategies.com To: Tigard City Council RECEIVED C.O.T. From: Robert A. Pierce, CLU, ChFC, CFP, MSFS MAY 2 7 2003 Re: Proposed Street Maintenance Trip Fee/Tax, etc. "Questions of Application & Statement in Opposition" Administration I am unable to attend the 5/27 City Council Meeting due to attending a BSA Eagle Court of Honor for 3 fine young men of Tigard. I am a 29 year resident and business owner in the Tigard area, Past Tigard Chamber of Commerce President and served as a volunteer for the City of Tigard in several ways. Please consider the following: • The best minds in the United States agree a tax reduction will help stimulate our economy. I serve many businesses in Tigard. Many of them are just keeping their doors open now by loans and losses. Whether you call it a fee or a tax is immaterial. You are attacking our community with a charge that must be paid whether there is any revenue or not. If a business is losing money, why should you charge more? What impact might this have on employment? • You wrestle over what percentage of the revenue should come from business and what from residence. Don't you realize 100% comes from residents? Business has to cover its cost by pricing of products and residents pay 100%. The City of Tigard should help create a healthy business climate. This proposal creates many unfair situations. • 1 recently had to take back a Commercial Office Building in Tigard, which I had sold 1 %2 years ago, because our economy is so poor and businesses are having rough times creating many vacancies. Your proposal says the fee/tax will be collected by the water/sewer bills. Buildings like mine provide water/sewer for the tenants in the lease. Therefore the businesses who lease space cannot be charged more since they have a lease with agreed rates. If the building owner pays the water/sewer is he now to be charged for the fee/tax for all of the businesses in the building? If so we are already losing money every month due to low occupancy. If not, how do most of the businesses in Tigard pay since most of them lease space in multiple occupancy buildings. This seems unworkable, and unfair. Please consider the possibility that this is the wrong proposal at the wrong time. We love our community and we want a viable thriving business community to provide jobs for our residents and compete fairly with adjacent communities and businesses. Thank you for your consideration. Copies to: Respectfully, Mayor/Council ~ Other: Gus Z_- Robert A. Pierce City Manager Council File lo" L-1 Z Registered Representatives offer securities through Walnut Street Securities, Inc.. Member. NASD & SIPC. Winning Money Strategies and Robert A. Pierce & Associates are not affiliated with Walnut Street Securities, Inc. AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF May 27, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE U date on Greenspaces Program by Metro President David Brag-don PREPARED BY: Cathy wheal /CCCaa`ry Stacey (Metro)DEPT HEAD OK ~ CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Hear an update by Metro President David Bragdon on the status and accomplishments of the Metro Greenspaces Program, with a focus on recent local acquisitions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION No action requested - information only. INFORMATION SUMMARY Metro Council President David Bragdon is visiting Metro jurisdictions to give an update on the status and accomplishments of the Metro Greenspaces Program, with a focus on recent local acquisitions. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Urban & Public Services - Goal 4 - Parks & Greenways: Open space and greenway areas are preserved and protected. ATTACHMENT LIST None FISCAL NOTES 'r r N/A INA M\PACKET'03\20030527\METRO GREENSPACES AISMOC Fanno Creek Greenway Trail Connecting the Willamette and Tualatin rivers Enjoy the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail Take a stroll along the - ' - - greenway trail. Walk near the calming waters of Fanno Creek. Discover the hidden neighborhood c= treasures of a corridor that p welcomes people, and at the same time, gives nature a place to breathe. For more information and scheduled events, visit Metro's web site www.meiro-region.org to complete the trail The Fanno Creek J.p'n oject partners are developing an connect trails and parks for walking, (Greenway Trail biking, in-line skating, running, for the completion of the trailThe Fanno Creek Greenway Trail strollin and bird watchin input are needed. For more b ` 1, or to participate in the corridor gracefully weaves through five provide much needed habitat for fish ment of the plan, call: cities and two counties. On its way to and wildlife ro's Regional Parks and Greenspaces becoming one of the premier urban improve air and water quality by rtment, (503) 797-1731 greenway trails in the Portland metro- filtering runoff, holding floodwaters Portland Parks and Recreation, (503) 823-2223 politan region, this I 5-mile corridor is a and reducing auto use. Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District, neighborhood dream conic true. The (503) 645-6433 recreational and commuter trail will work in City of Beaverton, (503) 526-2424 progress take people from the shores of the City of Tigard, (503) 639-4171 Together with local residents and citizen Pn eetpartners Willamette River in Southwest Portland groups, iIMetro, Portland, Beaverton, j to the confluence of Fanno Creek and Durham, Tigard, Tualatin, Washington The Fanno Creek Greenway Trail is a partnership project the Tualatin River. involving many public and private organizations: County and the Tualatin Hills Park and • City of Beaverton Recreation District have worked to • City of Durham Trail to the future provide trail access and protection to • Metro A multi-use trail for walkers, runners, nearly half of the Fanno Creck greenway. • City of Portland (Portland Parks and Recreation, Office of bicyclists and trail enthusiasts of all There still is challenging work ahead. Transportation and Bureau of Environmental5eMces) ,ages, the trail will be accessible to While recent land acquisitions have • City of Tigard • City of Tualatin people with disabilities. As the commu- secured key pieces for the trail and • Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District nity continues to grow, this valuable protected important habitat, there are • Washington County greenway trail will: critical links missing, including a trail • Clean Water Services (formerly Unified Sewerage Agency) . )ink neighborhoods, parks, schools, bridge crossing the Tualatin River. Once • Audubon Society of Portland community centers and businesses the remaining areas are secured, funds will • FansofFannoCreek • provide an environment for learning he needed for trail construction. Conaatau- • 40-Mile Loop Land Trust about local history nities will continue to acquire trail • National Park Service Rivers and Trails Program • SWfrailsGroupofSouthwest Neighborhoods, Inc. • provide safe corridors for walking casements and purchase land in the • Three Rivers Land Conservancy and biking to school and work corridor as opportUnltics arise. LEGIBILITY STRIP If% lick, • rl r, e Connecting the Willamette and Tualatin rivers .r ~ 7 ' n ~~.r' .fir _ r ~=d ~ Q ~ v~,t„ ~ ~ T, F.' ~ z ~r .r^ ~ '~„xq~ „ ~~33~ £ b'o7o,Q'kw~' -4'. 60 -~r ~ ~ ~ ~2 k ' • ~ ~ •s2 Y~~ 1 O F,rr' ;r-',~ 'yS - -r $t'r,;J,n F ~.3~,° _ V 'yf ~ r._ "t - F x " t TA o- -7un - jJ_ __`a'oo,~ oto 6 o..o d° `l'1 E 1;: ~ •.1~,~ , r ,z x..,. t+ n , ? ~ t OC^a A -e o%p~4-O ' ~_.C., ~R-~4 ~ ~~'~',a xi~r" rt«rr~e-~ _ I f x-~ ~o unno Blvdv ~sc,w ar ex rs~ + a` FMS- _ naa[denHomeR ~'b .,r _ ,,t ~ t i ' ~ ~a•.: ~si - I z ~S ' 1 ' i P' er r si , ' ~ °o~jf-"ali. : 'J ' ~ r ~ r _~+"'4 C-y~rt~ .S.'}~^^ o,f:c WHiMtfSord .y-~=L _r r€ y.« "+-rrs,E:a°I.,x I F _it,l y .,f: ,Je t t ~ ~ ~ Gar r ~ : ti.: > _I.'~ ;1 } : R , r. -i^'~ ~~.y. . S~- ~ kE `k., rC' r l SO~Q,~+st Ash _e~^ - r=,.`i;;~, wo ~mb7ia i 1, ~ ' P • ' ~ 3: ~f.,'~ t 43 T -6 .t.` s 1 . r•it r flore'nce Lone i,x [ ` >;t.. r i Z71, J. a s-0•y eater ' _ I~'}I'/~ s „ ys` ~ t:. i ' T. s C o~ i~. ~ t ~ et ~ 1 -t- ~TC ba v,z. eA ' I - ' t4 ¢ S j= - ' _t- ~ 7 a ~ r~ ,t,,,e•~ ,I f parks- r,t a } ` F V as -'i t --rs, k' t' ri - a fT-`~ `f~ Sat a ~f ac on, - Idg Fls r t 't•~~ ~ ~ - I 'T Fo sr d ~ a,~'~~' ~ t~ .'?~5 9y~ ti ^i rte: -t ~'S~. .1 - ;.F va G»csm8,r h - m r ,.1 - t 1 47 c" MS m - Metrger ' r i ; 7 - _ ::Mi r ,.es. 'tl+'4r•` r f t a i :3 Y ES!' rtlan ~•'rs°- rr`y gl I~ P' - rv' r;t -`.t' Fo ler i ~p r` ' ;d 41. _ t ~~~i 1..-' ~:1` MS pp ~z`.~-.~1, - F' ~ -5 ~ Q i• ~ i ~ ~~c.. i dt t arc R a o V S- r Ms_ z ry wed .m f 99 !f} .ate x„~'~.t esrmde Ch a ~1 '[1Pla 1s`ES _ ^ Lt ®~Q~® Y ^ ~ ~ ~ r ~ fisrCtt - Templeton FS } 0a - Y'. " . ~{~,r ! i Renatssa \ - ©Sy~ 8 Lakesc°`e a• G it y ~a 1 t - - _ F ~ 1 °grs•r=rse..~ s of ` ~ .r..d'~ , y '.n .t.-: t ~r - fi ~ a f~ S..- ~ ~ - z,j Hsd 0 _ ! ~':'r ~e~~ 1' f d • ~y, ~ ♦ ~5...~ Pitksz- f.w j ,s A' I ~ --a S ~ t ,=i~~ `.x. t S~ Dr- its , s r G°l aik y 9~ if tr• H %a At t • s~ } 6 r B7ant FS t t .r„'' sJridge J , slda:elhrook i ` `',.aav ~ 0O~° ~ ~ ~ f,~' i ~ ' ~ yr ~ !FS - ! Tualatin Rd t C1r b ! _ ~ , ' f f ~n ! , n Sr?at ° - Future Bike and _ t t I - r PedestrianBndy ='t ` z Ghil t t.>~ nc.z ! S 91 -0^ 'Yi'Hu CrreF T~ i r Hey elkin Miles Altitude Profile Willamette River Tualatin River Hal} Boulevard Scholls Ferry Road Denny Road Garden Home Hillsdale 600 500 400 M _ - - 300 = - - - - 200 ' 100 1 0 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Mlles Completed trail Transit center Fanno Creek watershed Light-rail transit and station Parks and open spaces Scheduled for construction (to be completed by Dec. 2002) _ Future commuter rail (red indicates Metro bond measure aquisitionto l2/1M01) and station Proposed trail Railroad tracks Schools ° (alignments are conceptual) ' _ n / 4 t p ~ ~0 l, 1 iY- 1 - so,, T 1•,, Y „ _ Fann® Creek C~reenway B0a~4/eftOn )T y~lBoooZ?oo Jn IL - OO v - ~"~tt%, - I •p1y R1; ~«~__`k,.; ~ A° , A~ ~w~,~,R~ Tra i l 2c r x...x r yl / e 1 M N 1 I. Ib.1 i. - 4 M / III / Completed Trail ! ~w \ ~i~ _ I CiJ ,14,✓ ~ T.~1 +-rr.+,.+ . ~ i € fn L L9 _ a b Scheduled for construction (to be completed by Dec. 2002) et 1~ . / h iywrF 'y 17UlTN(7yJfn,I000N t [y, Wx ry....st 5 Proposed Trail 1 , f' /'r,., `"`ry. -i a* r -1` o \ '~r1L rtt, n sr,.l- arR•• R (alignments are conceptual) Tigard Light-rail transit G r 5~ WD". S I Wy i t I .f 4"In kn„I, I ~g^'✓`~A.Ave1l/, e0s Parks and open spaces 7 1 ur4 t'I ~l/i ~r11 i ,N r ` Schools r,J i ~ cut ,4.;!t , J Ilrrifnrn Miles .N"`-` . r .,,1, n il`.„='".r r '-rt?r, 2. Hillsdale to Garden Home Beaverton and Tualatin Hills Park and ~t r The trail begins at Recreation Center (4 miles) Recreation District currently are planning and Willamette Park on the 2a A potential bicycle and pedestrian route constructing the final portions of this segment. Willamette River Greenway, just south along the old Red Electric Railroad alignment. Its feasibility will be deter- 4. Denney Road to Seholls Ferry of downtown Portland, stretches 15 mined through a public process. Road (7.5 mile) miles west and south through Beaverton, 2b One of Portland's Southwest urban trails. Trail access at both Denney Road trailhead This pedestrian route will be complete just west of Highway 217 and Fanno Tigard and Durham, and ends at the when soft surface pathways through three Farmhouse on Southwest Creekside. Trail Tualatin River Greenway in Tualatin. Portland parks and along undeveloped follows Fanno Creek through Fanno Creek The trail is divided into six segments rights-of-way are connected to existing Park and Greenway Park with access to neighborhood sidewalks. wetland habitat viewing areas and recreational with access to a series of local neighbor- improvements. 2c Another Southwest urban trait alignment. hoods and trail heads. This on-street bicycle route is complete 5. Seholls Ferry Road and follows Southwest Barbur and to Hall Boulevard (2.5 miles) 1. Willamette Park to Hillsdale Southwest Multnomah boulevards. From important habitat in Englewood Park, (2 miles) trail continues south in Tigard past the Tigard Great views from the Willamette River I Garden Home to Denney City Hall and Library. Greenway, including bald eagle and ^ Road (2.5 miles) heron nests on Ross Island. The 40-Mile 6. Hall Boulevard to Tualatin Loop jogs through the Corbett- Special access to Fanno Creek, wetlands, r neighborhood, through greenway habitat and Vista Brook Park (2.5 miles) TerwGeorgeilligeHr e Park connecting to from trailhead at Tualatin Hills Park and Fanno Creek enters the Tualatin River at Terwilliger Parkway and Hillsdale town Recreation District Community Center at Durham City Park. The 79-acre multi-purpose Oleson and Garden Home roads. Trail is Cook Park is just upstream on a large center. complete from the recreation center to meander of the Tualatin River. A future bike/ November 2001 Southwest 92nd Avenue. The city of pedestrian bridge over the river is planned. AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF May 27, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Fanno Creek Park Extension Master Plan PREPARED BY: Dan Plaza 2590 DEPT HEAD OK QV,~& CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Council is being asked to consider adopting the Fanno Creek Park Extension Master Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council adopt the Fanno Creek Park Extension Master Plan. INFORMATION SUMMARY In May of 2002 the City of Tigard voters approved a $13 million bond measure to be used for the construction of a new library. Based upon this action the City sought proposals from landscape architectural/park planning firms for the development of a Park Master Plan for the Fanno Creek Park extension. The City retained Murase Associates to do the Fanno Creek Park Extension Master Plan. The team consisted of Jonathan Beaver-Landscape Architect for Murase Associates, Dan Jenkins-Project Manager for Murase Associates, Ronald Rathburn, Ph.D. from Engineering and Environmental Solutions, and Matthew J. Dolan, P.E. from kpff Consulting Engineers. The entire site is 14.7 acres with the new library being built on 5 acres. The remaining 9.7 acres are to be developed as an extension of Fanno Creek Park, which is a linear park, dedicated to the passive use of green space and trails. A citywide community meeting was held on March 5, 2002 to ascertain public input on how they would like to see this site developed and landscaped. In addition to the March 5 meeting two other public meetings were conducted. They were held on February 26 and April 3. Based on public input, the master plan project consisted of, but was not limited to: ■ Development of natural areas ■ Planting/restoration/preservation/enhancement ■ Exterior landscaping ■ Outdoor community gathering places ■ Trails - both hard and soft surface ■ Trail alignment to Fanno Creek Trail - on/off-site ■ Vista areas to include benches/tables ■ Signing/labeling flora and fauna ■ Designing for wildlife habitat corridors and endangered species, if any ■ Blending/connecting to Fanno Creek Park behind City Hall The final draft is a direct result of the April 3 meeting where audience participation focused on trail options, bridge locations, special gathering areas, storm water gardens, stream enhancement opportunities, flora and fauna, and educational and recreational opportunities. Important recommendations were made pertaining to less development in the northern portion of the property and fewer secondary, soft trails. It was agreed that there should only be a few picnic tables at the site. The Library Building Design Team reviewed and approved the plan. The Planning Commission, on April 21, voted unanimously to support the plan and they recommend that Council approve and adopt the plan as presented. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Not approve the master plan. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Urban and Public Services #1, "....providing opportunities for the Tigard Community." Council Goal #2, "Acquire and develop parkland" ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment 1 - Master Plan (in two parts) FISCAL NOTES The cost for the master plan services is $26,397. Funds for this project are in the Parks SDC Fund-Park Development-$100K. The City has applied for a grant to construct the Fanno Creek Trail. ~ r. i FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY City of Tigard I III il'4: a.. Murase Associates May 2003 ` ~I!l~1lb' 1 1 FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY e The Fanno Creek Park Master Plan is an analysis of one section of the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail system just east of Hall Boulevard and directly abutting property to the south planned for the development of a new Library for the City of Tigard. The site is 9.7 acres of gently sloping land with a mix of open pasture, scrub/shrub and large trees. Fanno Creek divides the site into three distinct sections: a northern portion with a backwater slough from Fanno Creek; an eastern section of predominantly wet, forested areas; meadow near future library and a southern portion of large trees and open space directly adjacent to the proposed Library site. Vt!o The Fanno Crock Greenway Trail, itself, has been in planning and imple- mentation for years and extends in sections over 15 miles from the Tualatin River to Willamette Park in Portland. Over half of the trail has been com- pleted, utilizing a mixture of on-street and off-street routing. The Fanno Creek Park Master Plan helps fill in a missing link in this geenway trail, extending the park beyond Hall Boulevard toward its destination at the northern meadow Tualatin. Through a joint effort of the team of Murase Associates, KPFF Consulting Engineers, PBS Environmental Engineers; City staff, and interested citizens, this Master Plan has been developed to guide the long term development and protection that will occur in this area. Facilities and improvements identified in the Master Plan will help integrate the park into the larger Fanno Creek trail system as well as serve to connect this valuable green space with adjacent public facilities and adjacent properties. A Master Plan also serves as a mearts to better understand the complexities of this unique place and to guide fiature decision-making. It prioritizes r... development opportunities and protected areas within the study area. The ' resultant recommendations contained in this report will significantly expand the variety and quality of recreational opportunities within the Tigard y community as well as protect valuable land for people and wildlife. These r-anno creek enhancements will improve the livability of the community and attractive- ness to the area's residents. This Master Plan report describes the public }[[Jtt, `y and planning process that was undertaken by the design team and results in recommendations for future work on the site. backwater pond 1 FANNO CREEK PARK. MASTER PLAN SUMMARY a I's Prior to the development of a master plan team for the Fanno Creek Park property, two public meetings were held to establish some initial goals and program elements for the proposed Library and adjacent park property. The two public meetings were on March 5, 2002 and October 16, 2002. The meetings resulted in a number of suggestions about the type and quality of spaces and elements on the site, including: meadow Provide signs for the park mow Provide access to trail from library parking lot Keep open space as large as possible Provide a big buffer along Fanno Crock Purchase more land east of the site for open space Provide a series of pathways developed for education/recreation Have family-oriented use in open space Provide environmental education for professionals Natural environment is special pond Maintain wildlife habitat corridors _ Look at endangered species concerns Provide outdoor auditorium band shell Provide benches and picnic tables Provide meditation maze Look at existing house as cultural center These ideas were the basis of further discussions with the City of Tigard and interested citizens during the first and second public meetings and resulted in a series of goals for the park. The goals serve as a benchmark Fanno Creek and reinhider of priorities as the master plan process moves forward. The goals are: Develop a trail system to link the community and connect to Fanno Creek that provides accessibility for all people of all ages and physical abilities. Provide a variety of educational opportunities about the natural environment and local history. Preserve, enhance and restore the natural resources to promote wildlife habitat and improve water quality. Create uses and activities to strengthen the sense of community and compliment the library Design a safe and secure park 2 FAh1NO CREEK PARE" MASTER PLAN SUMMAP.Y Sit 67 An lysis 1 E /S x tit • and nctufol' • • • i r in I bus parking area m o n water Q'~ r % % aonaed.C~a'~ t" Tantwhifeoak % % % trallheadl, field % ba kwat r charm I ro sand % sircamban • d~ t , ~,o en water t' Jek# i ifuture hm" i Pinking ii L } field - 's ru / t , J - - - - - 1 IS; views giant white oak _ J ~future bulm" Wall Street Or-Mara Sto (proposed) i- i2i % _ ; ' - - • ~urlire trbiJ~4eott"1 Mbrjs6A~sociat / O 0 ® ® A a Gtyof Tigard, Oregon first public meeting, February 26th. 2003 3 FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY • • ' • r' 'i I I The site is divided into three distinct areas with Hall Boulevard creating an edge to the west of the property: The northern portion of the site contains a backwater slough that extends from Fanno Creek to the north and continues under Hall Boulevard to create a pond near City Hall and the existing Library. There is a small pond surrounded by a mature stand of native oaks in the center of this northern area. To the west of the pond is an open meadow of mixed grasses that appears managed by recent grazing or mowing. The remaining area is a mixture of trees and scrub/shrub. The property to the east of this area is in private ownership and remains undeveloped. The adjacent site to the north is leased by the school district as a parking lot for school buses and has a significant visual impact on the site. The existing Fanno Creek Trail ends wetland on the west side of Hall Boulevard, presenting a formidable barrier for the continuation of the trail. With an average of 16,000 vehicles per day on this roadway, the design of this crossing is vital to creating a safe connection across the roadway. The eastern portion of the site is primarily a mixture of mature deciduous iF . and evergreen trees. Although no wetlands have been delineated in this area, the ground surface is heavily inundated with water from Fanno Creek's consistent flooding. This area is separated from the western side of the site by Fanno Creek and is not readily accessible from the Hall Boulevard side of existing greenway trail the park. The southwest corner of the site sits adjacent to the site of the proposed new library building and is dominated by a large bowl-shaped meadow. A mixture of scrub/shrub exists along the river and a small wetland has been delineated to the south. Clean Water Services (CWS) has established a 50-foot setback around Fanno Creek and the adjacent wetland. Except for creek crossings and small trails, development within this zone is prohibited. Trails and crossings that impact this area will be subject to planting mitigation on a 1:1 basis in addition to the 50-foot buffer. Buffer plantings will be a mixture of native ` t vegetation, subject to CWS guidelines. Under a separate agreement with the City, a condition of approval for the new library will require planting within this buffer along the library side of the creek. The one hundred-year floodplain occupies a significant portion of the study area, with the new library planned rig}'it to its edge on the southern side. The presence of the floodplain will limit the amount of development that can i occur on the site. Earthwork activity within the floodplain will need to be permitted to ensure that a decrease in the available flood area for the creek does not occur. 4 FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY Site'Ahalysis • The site's natural areas offer significant habitat opportunities for this quickly urbanizing area. The following table provides an initial look at some general guidelines that helped guide conversations about the restoration work during the public process. This chart illustrates the general site areas, actions that could be taken to improve habitat, and the environmental benefits that can be expected from those actions: Area Action Environmental Benefit (Stream Stream bank restoration Reduces peak flows; reduces erosion; slows water, creating habitat for some fish, amphibians, and reptiles; increases in- Grade bank to shallower slope. streamhabitat diversity Plant with native riparian plants such as willows, red-osier dogwood, alder, and cottonwood. Increases habitat diversity; shades streambanks. Creates space for native plants, which serve as betterhabitat Control Himalayan blackberry for wildlife. Increases habitat diversity and shade, reduces human disturbance to wildlife; creates travel corridor, serves as cover Widen vegetated zone adjacent to stream in some areas. and shelter for wildlife; increases bank stability. Creates habitat and forage for watertbwi; increases habitat Increase emergent vegetation within stream diversity for aquatic invertebrates; traps sediments. Creates reproductive sites for cavity-nesting birds such as wood ducks, hooded mergansers, bufltchead, and wood i Install nest boxes in trees adjacent to stream peckers. Creates space for native plants, which serve as better habitat Shrub/scrub area Control Himmlayan blackberry. for wildlife. Creates habitat for amphibians, reptiles, and small mammals; shelters developing plants; serves as a source ofsoil Add large woody debris nutrients; traps sediments. j Creates habitiat for bats and birds, especially cavity-nesters I Preserve snags and large birds ofprey. Increases plant diversity; creates habitat for a variety of _ Field Plant native trees, shrubs, and herbs wildlife including songbirds, deer, and small mammals. Creates space fornative plants, which serve as betterhabitat Removc and controlnon-native pasture grasses. for wildlife; increases habitat diversity. Arrange plantings in clumped distribution with high vertical Increases structural habitat diversity; creates a variety of diversity. breeding sites, cover types, and Tnictociimates f Reduces physical_ disturbance to wildlife; increases plant and limit mowing to distinct areas wildlife habitat diversity. Creates space for native plants, which serve as better habitat L Remove Scots broom formvikllife; increases habitat diversity. J Creates space fornative plants, which serve as betterhabitat Wetland Remove purple loosestrife for wildlife; avoids widespread invasion. Increases habitat diversity; creates cover and shelter fmmthe ■ Shade banks by planting native trees orshrubs elements. I Add herbaceous vegetation in mmdflats along water line Increases habit. diversity; reduces erosion. Creates habitat and forage for waterfowl; increases habitat Increase emergent vegetation within pond diversity for aquatic invertebrates; traps sediments. Creates space for native plants, which serve as better habitat 1 Forest Remove Himalayan blackberry for wildlife; avoids widespread invasion. ! Creates habitat forbats and birds, especially cavity-nesters snags and large woody debris _ _ and large birds ofprey. 5 FAT R-10 CREEr PARE" MASTER PLAIT SUMMARY I s ° • - • e e ' • 'rarsr ng I ` bus parking area Legend i ~ - ! Z® t - Creek wetlands, forest, SW buffer zone • , ~ ~ ~ lirileda((CSYOrr lydi (roSfifq and NHr a%MpeMeJIK ~ Lritwway4 •pnrrva and .cram bas4lnq arras -~-~`---M- ` •create new hatkirq areas with woody / rtw[erub srd debris emergentvshai etw dy barilrs -Add •prrse:ve end enhance wo woody vegetation on Cants,wneree shade 1 •instalf ncstnq Is- near strean bank. T•e Forest. •p((•serw and eMarue wooded area V\ \ •remwe.-asrve species > ver>rn all f-tin(IUd",sags t.,r,d'r ~i • •irntdl nrshrq bom - ~y♦ ~ t°~.-. _ \ SlnuCq((ob: •prew(wr and mharxe netrvr srgrrJtion .ia _ venwrcbwu.erssgetetia, Field: •pewwand ersharscersative vegetation + •~j- ~ ; •relnpyeimasrve Vegeteflen Zone 2- Feld & scrub/shrub area Umlted xcest soh.surface trails and interpretive areas. as r I t ShruWxruC: Ypresetve and en hance ruWevehetatbn i +r s mwve irrvasiw vegetation "'xr:; r Firk# •pfrfrlw J(KlanlW%1 rYliw ragrtatiw, N _ 'r ww ilN a1c, fnatitMs • a s> s -Instal Mxlnq nq along Haa Rnadio \ Wff4 s,atpplrD0t♦i t \ prwmlroad al Mi • ' - 7,.p ♦ . -Stall mgratron nnnel benradr Wll Rd. r t Sir k+*'~: Zone 3- Library site and adjacent field 141, •-'•h' • Soh and hard surface trail% interpretive alias. ShnsbAtnrb' -preservrandenhamemmevegetation p.~-1.• \ enww n,nasiwvrgr(.tan Grpk ~ s Field: •preae, arxl en+uncerutwe svgefaoon Fe~'~.,~ 3 \ ,emovaiwasveregetaton ' r a N' .c r f L+ talft{e lll,SIf110 r1at1il~ • f~/"/ 1 , i 1 % as _ ~_J future building O'Mara St. ; ;r . , m. r t A i .u.~.r.wss D City ofTlgard,Oregon second pu is meeting, prl 3r ,2003 6 RC[+' PA.Rf Mr,'~tEF' P1t.,, SUti,t•AAR'1 Frr~rto C • o 0 • %_e end abltat ~ ®Faresth 1,,, um arkin9 area bus P /~f ^Ila b~ ub l,ybitat tat ( n •~Kn tti v4ettafld habitat ESQ xt4Kk'`\.•. t ~ ..eatkap-~ tuts i ! „mod d co habitat Stream f, itld ftycadl" ~Aw % * 1 y I 'eek i ~'huc4~... ' % l yL furore i _1T field r`~i . {tore i , \ 1 t 111, bulldln9 ,t. D~Mara'St. i 1 1 . 3r 2pp3 ® 1c meet~n o® w secon 7 - . e .Ore on G Ci Ti ofand FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER FLAN SUMMARY if ysis We have completed an assessment of sensitive areas at the Tigard Library Master Plan site. The assessment included (1) talking with Sue Biellce and other local biologists; (2) reviewing existing information on threatened, en- dangered, and sensitive species; and (3) visiting the site to determine the po- tential presence of listed or sensitive species or habitats. Setbacks and recom- mendations were based on the results of the assessment. This summarizes the species-specific recommendations provided on the following tables and only presents those relating to the trail location, buffers, or preserving specific habi- tats. Setbacks/Buffers From a regulatory standpoint, there is no requirement for buffers other than small animal ftail at pond the 50-foot buffer required by Clean Water Services, however, fish and wild- life species that would benefit from buffers currently inhabit or could poten- tially inhabit the Fanno Creek Park site. Some examples include the pond and painted turtles. Turtles, for example, can be easily frightened by human activ- ity causing them to avoid using certain areas. Other species may or may not change their behavior due to human activity. Some species will clearly avoid areas just because certain habitat requirements are not met, which might be related to the presence of buffers. The greater the human presence and activity in an area, the fewer wildlife species will be found in that area. Buffers can provide important benefits to species and habitats at the site, in- cluding reducing invasion by non-native plant species, reducing disturbance by human activity, and providing shade and large woody debris to the creek. The buffer requirements of Clean Water Services should be viewed as the minimally acceptable buffers along streams and wetlands. Larger buffers in these areas would enhance these habitats. To prevent possible adverse effects to habitat for steelhead - federally listed as threatened - existing trees within 100 feet of the creek should not be removed. Recommendations Although buffers are not required to protect certain species or habitats, the city may want to protect or buffer some areas to enhance fish and wildlife. The following recommendations provide optional measures the city could imple- ment to enhance fish and wildlife habitat. i Preserve the forested area east of creek and scrub-shrub area north of the j open water area Preserve the wetland, open water, and backwater pond Keep trail away from basking areas (areas of large woody debris in the stream) and use plantings to screen basking areas from people Preserve field habitat for turtle nesting. The northern field provides the most suitable locations for turtle nesting based on connections with the backwater pond and open water area. 8 FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER FLAN SUMMARY • o • e e• List of "sensitive species" that may be found on the site "Sensitive species" are defined as any plant or animal appearing in Rare Threatened and Endangered Plants and Animals of Oregon (ONHP 2001). This list includes species classified as follows: Federally threatened, endangered, proposed threatened or endan- gered, candidates for listing as threatened or endangered, or species of concern. On the Oregon Natural Heritage Program lists, and Listed critical, vulnerable, or peripheral or naturally rare under the ODFW threatened and endangered species program. No recommendations have been provided for sensitive plant species, because no sensitive plants species have been confirmed to be present on the master plan site. The following table describes potential animal species that may be present within the project site, their habitat, and recommended action: Animals 1lel0311mc am Ca®aNsae smut. Itablmgp ttalatmPresaatInPMectArea Reea®endedAeUm agihiblam BuJ6borealLr Western toad SV Marshes, small lakes, dry forests, o Welland o Reservetheforestareaeastofcreekand shrub thickets, streams o Scrub/shrub areas scrub-shrub area north ofopen water area o Fanno Creek Rana aurora Red legged frog SOC Wooded areas new streams o Forest o Preserve the forest area east ofcreek and scrub-shrub area north of open water area o Wettand o Add emergent vegetation to shoreline of wetland 0 Slough o Backwaterpond o Fanno Creek Rana prmosa Oregon spotted frog PC Perennial ponds and slow-moving o Wetland o Reserve wetland, open water, and streams, usually herbaceous plant backvater pond corvrunrties. o Slough o Plant emergent vegetation along nwgins of these water bodies o Backwalerpond Reptiles Chryamysplcla Rwnted turtle SC Marches, slow rivers, ponds, and o Fanno Creek o Keep trail away from identified insLream takes. basking areas Basking habitat includes logs, o Wetland o Buffer basking areas with shrubs or other branches, and emergent densegrowth vegetation. o Stough o Add basking structures to open water areas o Backwaterpond o Plant enigent vegetation in wetland and backwaterpond o Install fencing along road to prevent road kills on Hall Blvd o Create migration tunnel under I tall Blvd. Bmyrmarmorala Western pond turtle SOC,SC o FannoCreek o Keep trail away from identified instreant marmorala' basking areas o Wetland o Buffer basking areas with shrubs or other dense growth o Fenn Creek side channel o Preserve field habitat as nesting area o Fields o Improve field by planting native grasses and shrubs o Add basking structures o Plant encrgent vegetation in wetland o Acquire adjacent fields (taxlots 2SIO10001200 and 2SI02DA00500) and preserve as basking areas Con!!o lerarta Sharptml snake SV JMoist coniferous or deciduous o Forest edges o Preserve finest and provide buffer area forest, grassy areas at forest edge, around forest under ro cks and IND Peak activity Mar- June 9 FAPJNO CREEL' PARK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY H bit t I' Birds Ale apama Wood duck None Wooded areas nex to water o Fanno Creek o Preserve woody vegetation along creek o Wckwaterslough o Race nest boxes on trees overhanging creek and backwater pond Chordedes minor Common nighthawk SC Forageeverywhow F'Widonax d-alllll little willow SOC, Su Wallows at streamedgcc. Thickets o %'ery broiled areas along Fanno o Plant willows along edges orwetland brew.rterl flycatcher at forest clearings, tali bushy Creek vegetation near water o Sighted on property to south adjacent to wetland Eremophlla Streaked homed lark FC, SC Areas ofhttle to no vegetation o Field o Preserve field habitat alpesrrts (agricultural land, pastures, grasslands) elemerpes Acorn woodpecker SOC Large oaks, other broadleafs tray o None o None f.mdeivoms, be present Progne sabu Purple martin SIX, SC: Cavities adjacent to "pen areas o Forest contains runny cavities, o Preserve forest crevices, snags, and broken top trees for nesting o Fields for foraging o Place nest boxes in forest Sials:mesieano Westem bluebird SV Clearcuts with snags, faros, o Forest contains many cavities, o Place nest boas in forest and on posts in riparian woodland; need cavities crevices, snags, and broken top trees fields for nesting o Fields for foraging Stronellanegleeta Westemmeadowlark SC Ckasslands, pastures, meadows, o Field o Reserve field habitat adapted to agriculhue. Mf als rionyrlerir Silver-hared bat SOC, SU Forested areas, hollow trees, bark o In hollow trees and under bark - Preserve forest rroctivagans in forest yobs thysanoides Fringed myotis SOC, SV Conifers, caves, crevices, o In crevices, forested w'elland o Reserve forest buildings, forested riparian areas Thomomys Cartes pocket gopher SOC Omssy areas, pastures, roadsides, o Field o Preserve field habitat belbtvore.t agricultural lands F7sh Ghcorhynchus Steelhead FT o Stream o Protect existing trees within 100 feet of myklss• creek o Plant shrubs and trees where to w;rartd the vegetated buffer along the creek Sources: Csuti, B., and coauthors. 1997. The Atlas of Oregon Wildlife. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon. Leonard, W. P., H.A. Brown, L.L.C. Jones, K. R. McAllister, and R. M. Storm. 1993. Amphibians of Washington and Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, Washington. Maser, C. 1998. Mammals of the Pacific Northwest from the coast to the High Cascades. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon. NatureServe. 2002. An on-line encyclopedia of life. http://www.natureservc.or&xplorer/. Ac- cessed March 21, 2003. ORNHP (Oregon Natural Heritage Program). 2001. Rare threatened and endangered plants and animals of Oregon. Oregon Natural Heritage Program, Portland, Oregon. Storm, R. M., and W. P. Leonard. 1995. Reptiles of Washington and Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, Washington. *Documented by ORNHP as being present near the study area. a C: Candidate for listing under ODA (Oregon Department of Agriculture) FC: Federal candidate Tor listing f FT: Federally listed as threatened t ONHP List 1: threatened with extinction or presumed to be extinct throughout their entire range ONHP List 2: threatened with extirpation or presumed to be extirpated from Oregon ONHP List 3: may be threatened or endangered in Oregon or throughout their range, but more data are needed SOC: Federal species of concern SC: State candidate SU: State rank unknown SV. State vulnerable species 10 FANNO CREEK. PARK MASTER FLAN SUMMARY Plants scledlbeNow CotetnanNatae sbaus HabltatType Known in Known InWoWu6ton HabltatPresentin Wlllametkvalley?t County? 1 Protect Area Astercurtis White-topped aster SOC Grassland lowlands Yes No Fields Carezcomosa Bristly sedge ONHP List Marshes, lakeshores, Yes No Wetland, wet pockets 2 wet meadows in field Castilleja levisecta Golden paintbrush LT Open grasslands Yes No Field below 300 feet Cimicifuga elates Tall bugbane ONIIP List Mature, me sic Yes No Forest I coniferous orrnbcd forests Delphinium White rock larkspur SOC Open ground, most Yes Yes Field, especially wet leucophaeum low meadows, pockets fencerows and ditches. 125 - 250 ft Erigeron decumbens Willamette daisy I.F. Grasslands Yes No Fields var. decumbens llorkelia congesta Shaggy horkelia SOC Open sandy or rocky Yes Yes Fields, forest flats to open woods Lomatium bradshawii Bradshaw's lomatium LE Seasonally wet prairie Yes No Wet pockets in field and grassland Montia howellii Howell's mantis C Most lowlands Yes No Wetland, wet pockets in field, Polygonum Water smartweed 014I1PLst Most places Yes No Wetland, stream, punctatum 3 slough Pyrracoma racemosa Raccmose pyrrocoma ONIIP Lst Meadows, open Yes No Field vsr. racemosa 2 places; Willamette valley Rorippa columbiae Columbia cress Margins of bodies of Yes No Stream, wetland, water inundated slough during the growing season Sidalcea campestris Meadow sidakea Dry fields, fencerows, Yes Yes Fields roadsides Sidalcea nelsoniana Nelson's sidakea LT Open areas such as Yes Yes Wctland, wet pockets streams, roadsides, in field, stream and meadows. Seasonallinundated. Verbena hasiata Blue verbena Most low places, Yes No Wetland, stream, ditches slough WoMFa borealis dotted water•mcal Damp ground, swamps Yes No Wetland, wet pockets I I within fields Wo0a columbiana Colsmbs water-meal Fresh water Yes No Wetland Note: The species Querous garryana (Oregon white oak) has no status, but as a plant community it is quite rare. The individuals on the Tigard Library site are especially large and should be preserved because of their uniqueness. PBS recommends that oak trees be protected to prevent further damage by wildlife. Sources: WNHP (Washington Natural Heritage Program). 2003. Field guide to selected rare plants of Washington. hup://wwtivwa Qov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nilp/refdcsk/feuide/htm/fgmain.htm. Accessed March 21, 2003. Hitchcock, C. L., and A. Cronquist. 1976. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Tenth Edition. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. Pojar, J., and coauthors. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest coast; Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska. Lone Pine Publishing, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. NatureServe. 2002. An on-line encyclopedia of life. http://www.naturescrve.org/explorer/. Ac- cessed March 21, 2003. ,According to Oregon Natural Heritage Program, 2001. 11 FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY _ First Public Meeting public ~ng attendance: On February 26, 2003 at 7:30 pm, the first of two public meetings was held at the Tigard City Hall. The team presented drawings showing existing site Drake Dunning conditions and habitat types as well as a list of goals developed from the previous October 16, 2002 Library Site Public Meeting. The purpose of this initial public meeting was to solicit additional thoughts about program, concerns about site development, or other ideas that could affect the direc- Ronald Leistra tion of the Master Planning effort. Although public turnout at this initial meeting was low, many constructive comments and suggestions resulted from this meeting. Public comments and Questions: Sue Beilke Problem with trail connections across Hall Blvd. It cuts access to site Lots of existing native vegetation (trees and shrubs) on site which should be preserved. Nesting area in the floodplain should be preserved Steve Andrews There was some confusion as to the total size of the site, whether or not the library site itself is included in the acreage for the park, and whether or not the forest is included in the site. If the streambank is regraded, will existing trees and shrubs be removed? Regrading should be done with as little impact on Ralph Anzelloni existing trees and shrubs as possible. Species of significance: frog, turtle may use site Was there American Indian usage of the site? Some areas should have no public use, just habitat, especially where sensitive species are concerned. Martha Bishop Keep trails away from ponds as much as possible. More signage: unique habitats, preservation, no disturbance. Could utilize children's art. Education opportunities, links to livability. Volunteers, slide shows, tours on site, bird walks. Existing house could be used as a staging point to speak to areas on the north side of the site, the ponds and backwaters Connections need to be made to the library itself Do we have funding for trails? Mix of hard surfacing and soft surfacing 50' setback from creeks Don't overdevelop trails; too much access means degradation of habitat. Trails with buffers, to avoid sensitive areas Would be nice to be able to see the creek from trails; bridges might be nice. Signage along trails, possibly designed in cooperation with schoolkids Improve the crossing at hall, possibly beneath the street Maybe run the paved trail on the east side of the creek rather than through the site itself, save the site for lower-impact trails and interpretive. Minimize paved trail by utilizing the parking lot. Trails with buffers - need to identify where the sensitive areas exist Be conservative in solutions Trails could go beneath street 12 FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER FLAN SUMMARY O • ° • • On April 3, 2003 at 7:30 pm, the second I r F public meeting was ~M. held at the Tigard City Hall. The purpose of this 5 meeting was to present three alternative design concepts based on ` input from the previous Public Meeting as well as to solicit comments about those options or other ideas that may need to be considered. The design team presented three distinct schemes showing the location of the primary connecting trail, secondary trails, and boardwalks. In addition, a number of locations were discussed regarding interpretive area locations and small group gathering areas. preferred diagromFromsecondpublic Additional buffer areas were shown; however detailed planting or stream meeting meeting bank improvements were not analyzed in detail. A brief summary of the options follows: Scheme A This scheme showed the primary trail very close to the library and a central gathering space at the base of the bowl area. Pathways in the northern r• portion of the site were minimized, but included a small boardwalk. A series of native plant gardens that integrate storm water from Hall Boulevard were integrated into the plan as well as an overlook on the cast edge of the site. Scheme C gathering area Scheme B This scheme showed the primary trail crossing Fanno Creek toward the east end of the site. Secondary trails create a series of arc-shaped paths that terminate in various overlook conditions near water. The northern section of the site includes a longer boardwalk. The storm water runoff from Hall Boulevard is treated in a more structured series of channels. The larger gathering/interprctive space is located to the east of the open meadow "bowl". Scheme C This scheme showed the primary trail crossing the creek immediately from the north and maintaining a close proximity to the proposed library. An optional future path was shown branching off the main path toward the eastern forest area in anticipation of an alternate path connection that was under consideration further to the south. To the north, a gathering space was developed that integrates a water garden that is connected to the backwater slough (see illustration). In addition, secondary pathways venture further to the cast in the northern section. 13 soon FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY son 14 e 7:y p 4t►o a/ici.r. Y N N 11 ~ ~ w .a A f 14 Scheme A REEK PARK MASER PIA SUMMARY woo FANNO C + e b • 4 i. W ' 15 S~hem~ 6 K SARK MpSjER PLAN SUMMARY FPN~1° CREE s ° o • y ~ e r ! n' ~i• 1 t' 4 ~ R _ „t• ,1 - 16 Scheme c; FANNO CREEK PARK (MASTER PLAN SUMMARY blic _ _ o _ s second Public Meeting public attendance: Public comments and questions: Mary Loofbourow Some picnicking is desirable - promoting positive activity in the park reduces elicit behavior. Hardscape path alignment should be further from Library (Scheme B preferred). Changes to Hall Street biofiltration swale should not include moving within future building pad. Ronald Leistra Team should evaluate potential runoff problems from adjacent bus parking area to the north of project area. Creek crossing should occur as close to Hall Blvd as possible (Schemes A & C preferred) Look at crossing Fanno Creek along Hall Blvd to prevent distur- Sue Beilke bane of turtle habitat on northern section of site. Some don't prefer introducing bike traffic along Hall Blvd for safety reasons. May require short term improvements to bridge for access and ADA improvements. Minimize extent of soft trails, especially on Schemes B & C. Find John Frewing essential trail movement - don't try to do too much on such a small site. Prefer gathering on library site on Scheme B. Some preferred gathering space on Scheme A. Soft paths don't need to be looped. Sue Kasson Like boardwalks to keep people from moving into sensitive areas. Some people like loops for safety and visual interest - more variety. Could introduce fence to prevent dogs and people from entering turtle habitat. It is important to give people educational opportunities near pond. Mike Davidson Need connection from hardscape trail to Hall Blvd on Library side of creek to allow connection to front area bicycle parking. A quick sketch was developed to illustrate a fourth option for the primary trail alignment (see page 13). This allowed the trail crossing of Fanno Mark Mahon Creek to occur toward the western edge of the site away from sensitive habitat and also allowed the trail to stay as far from the library as possible to preserve the bowl-shaped meadow. 1 ' 1 I I I I i A S a 17 FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY Fin-61 • As a result of the two public meetings a final Master Plan drawing was completed. The plan is a culmination of planning efforts by the Master Plan consultant team members and input from interested citizens and City staff: The plan strikes a balance between the programmatic needs of the park as a linear greenway system and the protection of the natural resources found on the site. It incorporates the sketch generated at the end of the last meeting and reduces the number of secondary pathways while still maintaining access to some habitat areas for educational and interpretive programs. Primary Trails A primary paved trail connects the site from north to south to the existing Fanno Creek Greenway Trail system as it winds down from the north near the existing City Hall Building and existing Library. The trail crosses Hall Boulevard to the north and immediately crosses Fanno Creek to avoid potential sensitive turtle habitat near the northern pond. The trail wraps around the edge of the natural bowl area below the proposed library and directly adjacent to the edge of the 50' river setback. The trail then heads to the south and crosses the wetland with a boardwalk before connecting with the adjacent property to the south. The decision to keep the primary trail on the west side of Fanno Creek was made to avoid the sensitive habitat areas of the forest on the east. The trail will need to accommodate two-way pedestrian and bicycle traffic. The minimum acceptable width for a small multi-modal path is 10-feet and is consistent with the existing greenway trail. The surfacing should be asphalt to match the existing grecntivay trail, but could be designed using permeable asphalt to allow water infiltration. Secondary Trails Ono important function of the greenway trail is its connectivity to adjacent land uses. Access between the proposed library and the greenway trail provides opportunities for library programs to expand into the habitat areas of the park. A 5-foot asphalt trail will provide a connection on the north side of the library to the sidewalk on the Hall Boulevard right-of-way to allow bicycle access to the parking areas on the south side of the building. Soft Trails A third level of trail development allows access to informal areas such as gathering spaces, interpretive areas or special garden areas. These paths are 4-feet wide and are made of (fully accessible) fine crushed gravel. Trail Crossing; at Hall Funding is currently being secured for a signalized trail crossing at Hall Boulevard. Trail crossings should visually indicate the presence of pedes- trian activity and could include bollards or stone pillars to mark their presence along the roadway and prevent vehicular access. An 8-foot wide refuge island is under consideration at the centerline of Hail Boulevard and could serve as a visual indicator of pedestrian movement. Details of standard marking elements are available through the Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces program. 18 EK P ARK MASZ~R PLAN SUMMARY FANNO CRS --.Malmo 10000 • • • t1 Ifi, t''I' ta••.as `t i t. , } f y [ ~ 4 l rr r ; . et ~ . XA~ I ~ ~ r+ 21st, 2083 ` t 19 t ore on Ti ard, Gi of FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER FLAN SUMMARY • • • -e Aries The single bridge crossing on the north end of the site provides opportuni- ties for directly viewing the river. The actual span needed to cross the river with a bridge will need to be determined with additional survey work, but appears to be approximately 50-feet in length. From a design standpoint, the bridge is a wonderful opportunity for a unique expression of materials or some of the unique qualities of the site. Boardwalks A boardwalk is indicated on the north side of the site providing a connection from the primary trail to the backwater pond. Because this is an area of potential turtle-nesting habitat, a boardwalk is used to encourage visitors to stay out of the meadow and habitat areas. The boardwalk terminates at the pond and could provide seating areas beneath the large existing oak trees as well as opportunities for interpretive signs that describe the local history and ecology. The boardwalks should be 5-feet in width and made of wood. The boardwalk providing access over the wetland area could also be incorporated with interpretive signs or seating. This boardwalk should be 10-feet wide to match the primary trail width. Interpretive and Gathering Areas Both the boardwalk at the pond and a unique area to the northeast of the proposed library site provide interesting opportunities for interpretive and gathering. The larger gathering space could be an area of crushed stone paving and a series of stone walls that provide both group and individual seating areas. The walls provide a physical barrier to prevent disturbance of naturalized areas, but provide a sense of permanence and durability to the space. Additional opportunities exist in these areas for interpretive signage or art display, for example birdhouses made by local school or community organizations. Bowl The open meadow area just north of the proposed library will be left as open space with a small space at the center of its bowl-shaped topography. This small space could be dcfmcd by a low stone wall and could serve as a focal point for group gatherings or perhaps just a place to pull off' the primary trail during a bike ride. 20 FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAhd SUMMARY Final • • Stream Restoration and Buffer Planting Restoration opportunities in and around Fanno Creek could offer long term water quality improvement, improved in-water habitat, and improved plant and animal habitat along its edges. Currently Fanno Creek is severely undercutting its banks. Its steep sides lack opportunities for all but minimal vegetation to take hold. This channeling effect of the stream and lack of in- water vegetation to slow down stream flows has compounded erosion problems and has created a lack of space for water during flood events. Regrading the stream bank to flatten the stream profile would help slow water flows, provide more flood storage capacity, and provide areas for planting improvements. Stabilization of the creek channel may need to be considered along the entire creek, especially where stream currents tend to erode banks. Because there are some existing trees along the bank, an effort should be made to incorporate those plantings into the grading concepts. Smaller trees could be temporarily removed and replanted. Redeveloping the creak channel will also provide opportunities to remove invasive plant species. Regardless of the extent of work within Fanno Creek itself, Clean Water Services will likely require additional planting within the 50 foot buffer. As a condition of approval for the new library project, the south side of the Creek will be replanted using a mixture of native plant species. This work is being conducted independently of this Master Plan effort. Improved native planting efforts should also be considered around the backwater pond. Other planting restoration efforts or plans to remove invasive plant species could be coordinated through cooperation between the City and private organizations, such as Fans of Fanno Creek. Visual Mitigation should be provided on the north end of the site to screen the existing bus parking area. Native evergreen trees that grow in excess of 30-feet will need to be planted along the north end of the site on either side of the backwater slough. Additional buffer planting of both native trees and shrubs could be provided along Hall Boulevard to provide spatial definition of the meadow area and visual and noise protection between the trail and street. Visual access at the trail crossing on Hall Boulevard will need to be considered when providing this additional buffer planting. Sgnage Wayi'mding along the trail should be coordinated with efforts along the entire length of the Fanno Creek Greenway. A January 2003 report entitled "Fanno Creek Greenway Trail Action Plan" available through Metro Re- gional Parks and Greenspaces contains invaluable information regarding trail signage templates. (htip://www.metro-region.orQAibrary does/parksgreen/ fannonlan.pdD Additional signage should be considered giving directions to the library from the primary trail as well as interpretive signs in various locations in the park. Signs indicating the possible presence of nesting turtles should be imple- mented when the primary trail is constructed. On April 23, 2003 the Tigard Planning Commission voted to recommend to City Council approval of the Master Plan 21 FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY Fin _ _ , Contacts: Planning Commission Meeting Division of State Lands On April 23, 2003 the design team presented the final Master Plan to the Collin MacLaren Tigard Planning Commission. The Tigard Planning Commission voted to (503) 378-3805 recommend to City Council approval of the Master Plan. One question was raised regarding the ability for police monitoring of the park from Hall U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Boulevard. A subsequent meeting with the Police Department resulted in Cathy Harris approval of the plan without changes. (503) 808-4387 Overseeing Agencies for work in Fanno Creek Clean Water Services The approval process for work along Fanno Creek or adjacent wetlands will Phone: (503) 846-3553 depend upon the extent of work proposed for each phase of development. Grading in excess of 50 cubic yards within the zone of ordinary high water typically triggers a joint application process through the Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of State Lands. The application process can take as little as 45-60 days under the Nationwide Permitting Process or 120 days under Individual Review, depending upon the extent of work. Both agencies review the application materials individually and look at the location and type of impacts that will occur (e.g. removal of vegetation or impact on river flow or flooding) and what mitigation may be required. Often, the land owner will be required to monitor mitigation efforts for five years after completion of work. Oregon Division of Fish and Wildlife will review impacts on riparian vegetation and habitat under the DSL review process. The presence of endangered species will require review by NOAA Fisheries under the Army Corps of Engineer review process. Documents required for these reviews will include earthwork design and cut/fill calculations, a site plan showing extent of proposed improvements, determination of "mean high water" and "ordinary high water", cross sectional views, planting plans, details, and other information deemed necessary to effectively evaluate the potential impacts and mitigation measures of the project. Because project review through both the Corps of Engineers and DSL are analyzed on a case-by-case basis, additional infor- mation may be requested depending upon the level of environmental impact. The proposed improvements illustrated within this Master Plan will likely trigger this approval process, but are likely to benefit water quality and habitat along Fanno Creek. We anticipate likely approval of these improve- ments assuming a complete submittal package. Clean Water Services will review all work within the 100-year flood plain and specifically witifin the 50-foot buffer along Fanno Creek and the wetlands. 22 \ ,1 1 FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY • • s1- pptc.drifi be Library Project Conditional Use Permit The conditions of approval required after an April 7, 2003 public hearing before the City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer requires construction of the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail. The following language is an edited summary of those portions which directly relate to the Fanno Creek Park Master Plan" THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO IS- SUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext, 388) for re- view and approval: a letter from a registered professional engineer that indicates that any encroachments made by this proposal will not increase the flood levels during the base flood discharge. 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the building, the applicant shall show that it is making a continuing, diligent, good faith effort to identify an alignment for a pedestrian/bicycle path along Fanno Creek that will not be below the elevation of an average annual flood. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FI- NAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 388) for re- view and approval: 21. Prior to the issuance of a final occupancy permit, the applicant shall provide adequate financial assurances, in the form of a cash deposit, a bond or inclusion of the project on a city 5-year capital improvements project list, to ensure construction of that portion of the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail that crosses the property. No portion of the trail shall be below the eleva- tion of an average annual flood. 23 r , FANNO CREEK PARK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY • • 7.+T-T rp =n:,sra*n' --3--* r r z . t^?,'gay fall 77 ' Unit Unit Cost Range i ~ I Streambank Restoration (including regrading If of bank, stabilization, bank $100-$200 erosion control, revegetation, habitat Buffer Plantin excluding streambank planting) sf $1.00-$2.00 Meadow Restoration sf $0.15-$0.25 Special Garden Plant ng_ sf $3.00-$4.00 Trees L ea $200-$300 Primary Path (10' wide AC) _ if $15-$20 Secondary_ Path (5'-wide bark or gravel) if $7.50-$10 8 foot wide Wood Boardwalk_/Overiook If $175-$225 Pedestrian Bridge (10' wide wood and steel) Is $60,000-$85,000 Stone Walls at Gathering Areas If $130-$160 Fencing If $30-$60 lrrterpretive Signs - - - - ea $100-$2,000 Benches ea $1,000-$1,200 - - - - - - - - - - - Picnic Tables ea $1,000-$1,200 24 AGENDA ITEM No. 8 Date: May 27, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-] U DICIAL) TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: CONSIDER VAC 2002-00002 SW MAPLELEAF AND SW OAK WAY VACATION Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose I A Time Limit on Testimony IAADM\GREER\CITY COUNCIUCCSIGNUPtPH TESTIMONY QJ ANNEXATIONMOC AGENDA ITEM No. 8 Date: May 27, 2003 PLEASE PRINT Pro onent - S eakin In Favor Opponent - (Speaking Against) Neutral Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. 99--7S Sw AU/6a F Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. i i Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. AGENDA ITEM # B FOR AGENDA OF May 27, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW Ma leleaf Street and SW Oak Wa tr e Va// tion VAC2002-00002 PREPARED BY: Mathew Scheidegger DEPT HEAD OK *~~l ITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE OUNCIL Should the City Council vacate an approximately 26,258 square foot portion of public right-of-way commonly known as SW Mapleleaf Street and a 9,716 square foot strip of right-of-way south of SW Mapleleaf Street better known as SW Oak Way? STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council vacate a 26,258 square foot portion of public right-of-way commonly known as SW Mapleleaf Street, and the 9,716 square foot strip known as SW Oak Way. INFORMATION SUMMARY In the City vacation process there are two ways of initiating the vacation of streets, easements and other public dedicated areas. An applicant may file a vacation petition with the City Council, which initiates a vacation by passing a Resolution to schedule a formal public hearing to consider such requests. The second option is for an applicant to file a petition with the Planning Commission requesting a vacation. This requires signatures of all abutting property owners and of the owners of two-thirds of the properties affected by the vacation. The Planning Commission then makes a recommendation to the City Council based on compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The City Council initiated the vacation on April 18, 2003. Currently, Metzger School is built over a portion of Mapleleaf Street. The Tigard - Tualatin School District is going to replace the existing Metzger Elementary School with a new school at the same location. The School District is requesting to vacate 26,258 square feet of SW Mapleleaf Street and an approximately 9,716 square foot portion of right-of-way formerly known as SW Oak Way, which is a 14-foot-wide unimproved area runing east to west, south of the School District property. There are no existing utilities in or along either right-of-ways to be vacated as shown in Attachment 1, Exhibit C. Portions of SW Mapleleaf have previously been vacated in 1978 o (Ordinance No. 78-182). This ordinance vacated Mapleleaf, east of SW 90th Avenue. Ordinance No. 89-19, vacated approximately 3,825 square feet of SW 93rd Avenue and SW Mapleleaf, west of SW 90th Avenue in i order to construct the Lincoln V office building and parking stricture. f Chapter 18.810.040.B.1 of the Tigard Development Code states, "The perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: a. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water, or pre-existing development; or b. For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, collectors or railroads. c. For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. However, Chapter 18.810.040.B.2 states that "Bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is exempted by B.1 above. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmentail or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code." These standards are to provide connectivity and were adopted through the Transportation Systems Plan. With the vacation of Mapleleaf Street, the perimeter of the block will be approximately 2,600 feet. If the Oak Way portion is also vacated, the perimeter will be approximately 3,100 feet. When the School District submitted for conditional use approval in order to build the Metzger Elementary School, they requested a variance to the block length standard. The adjustment was deemed unnecessary based on findings that the criteria could be met by providing a pedestrian connection within 325 feet of the SW Locust Street right-of-way to the north. At the public hearing for Conditional Use approval on April 28, 2003 to replace the Metzger Elementary School, the Hearings Officer approved the applicant's proposal to locate a pedestrian pathway 325 feet from SW Locust Street. The location of the proposed pedestrian path satisfies the spacing standard, which requires connections to be no more than 330 feet. Based on the Hearings Officer's finding, which ensures the block length standard to be met, Staff is satisfied that the Oak Way right-of-way will not be required to meet the block length standard. Therefore, Staff has no objection to either right-of-ways being vacated. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Take no action at this time. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Not applicable. ATTACHMENT LIST Attachments: Attachment 1: Letter Requesting Initiation of the Vacation Exhibit A: Plat Map Exhibit B: Aerial Photo Exhibit C: Utilities Map Attachment 2: Proposed Ordinance Exhibit A: Mapleleaf Street Legal Description • Exhibit B: Mapleleaf Street Site Plan Exhibit C: Unnamed strip of public right-of-way formerly known as SW Oak Way Legal Description Exhibit D: Unnamed strip of public right-of-way formerly known as SW Oak Way Site Plan. FISCAL NOTES There are no direct fiscal impacts as a result of this request as all fees have been paid by the applicant. ATTACHMENT I i Tigard - T4alatin School District 23! Larry Hibbard Adminlstration center 6960 SW Sandburg Stiet'l Tigard, Oregon 97223 503.431.4000 • fax 503-431.40.17 www.ttsd.kl2.or.us December 27, 2002 Mayor Griffith Members of Tigard City Council City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mayor Griffith and Members of the Tigard City Council: The following materials are provided to request a City-initiated street vacation of the following roadways located adjacent to and through properties owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The attached Plat Map (Exhibitk illustrates the location of the proposed vacations: • A portion of Mapleleaf Street between Monroe and Lincoln (previously vacated streets) • A portion of SW Oak Way, a 14 foot right-of-way south of Mapleleaf Street between Monroe and Lincoln (previously vacated streets) The Tigard-Tualatin School District (the District) is requesting that the City Council bring forward these street vacations for the following reasons: 1. As shown on the Plat Map (Exhibit,(), portions of the right-of-ways for both of these streets have already been vacated. The western portion of Mapleleaf Street was vacated in 1979; with the eastern portion of the Mapleleaf Street right of way vacated in 1988. 2. As shown on the Aerial Photo (Exhibit), a portion of the Mapleleaf Street right of way is already covered by a portion of the existing Metzger Elementary School, constructed in the mid 1970's. This construction was approved as a Conditional Use by Washington County in 1972. L 3. The District is interested in replacing the Metzger Elementary School with a new school at the r same location. Development of a new school of sufficient size to meet the needs of the School 4 District with adequate open space, amenities, and parking is extremely difficult unless these rights-of-way are vacated. In accordance with our discussions with City of Tigard Planning staff, the District will be applying concurrent to this request for a Conditional Use application for this development. 9 j 4. As shown on Exhibit@, Utilities Maps, there are no existing utilities in or along either right-of- way that we are requesting to be vacated. i s A 3 177 z Previously Vacated I ON 5 T I S , R I W W. M. Street Vacation Request [ l SECT SCALE: I"m 2001 L E M A N A C R E 'r R A C T S sW CI 9 0 7 G S 1 ! o`i3 Ai G p2 g 4 3 Q 3 to f. ~ C.R.2688 T/J (T53) eC 2344 ---S.W.•=-`-r~t LOCUST STREET V 4 ` T/a t Bl _ 8 1 I ,••ti a i rot. C.R. 1541 Sol/820 //oy' p ~e ♦ a t 1 ♦ a: 1 ♦ a e I i♦ a: 1 ° 1 a e 1 ♦ a t p ♦ s t 1 ♦ St •4 N ~ N ~ 1 a 4• ~ g I 4 3 10 8 7 / ll 6 10 I ~N all eu N en N fll N ell N • 11 ~ 611 .,l+. _ all ~ t •f 0 o f 10 r t o f b • f I r 7 10 "a t T •f 7 Of 10 7 •f i, I n ■5 a. G a r ~ : Tuts a snia C.R.26 J MAPLELEA (n S. w se W. y, u ✓ 28 29 31 2 C.R. 1508150' t0/127 W `may j•.• r I 25 ~ ~ ~ G + ' `a' 0 20 f 1 Y ♦ a: 1 Z ae 1 f: ♦ : 1 N F ur 2G 27 32 e It lei f 14 _ 0 16 v1 17 x 18 w t9 13 ~u, a • i1 ' u e 1 ~Q 1 a. all IC . v su .Q an a I It • 1 • 12 to `t I O Z `O a 3" Tp 15 5 N~ of Q 1 10 I ~ 7 DC 23+qX Proposed for Va ation 41~~Z9 QP = of left C4 o ~ LEGIBILITY STRIP PIN r 4 m{ c'?~' axis ~ ;~kl ~ ' ~ < ~s ~t~~~'+ ' Y ~d'v € M --I e ! 1 1'~ 1, 3 Yc~$' h~x~~~'z"_ f n s y ~•Z yr + rd^ t~~o ' ~ /w qy'7 .r tC~l','~~•++µ~i.,4ri_'•++`d.-•.•r.Y'++' 4.~-~ry 4... ti` ti"~l'~y," _.J If . 5. i is', 1'~G.; }l1'1. ~',x i~rl~}, r;l:-'~ C c i ,_7•"L &f+•"~_ . { .~i' jl d^ 5 ..p_,. t{ I~:•. •'t -'r~rJ S-'l~ 0.gr~ .p„~ , .f. S.'-'..~ r-,• . ~ ..•G .o - f '{C4 z"~` k t ,T ~ C ~~-t ~ YR3': ",`:~'~:'`~x;,,~{•. r~; :~i~~y x t~rsZ<~~r~ Z~4„~,! {.;i:.s; f -:J'~ ''`Fr ~ 7~ s~~3 ~i NL, rYr$r?~'~`d ~t+_~t~ j$':+1 %~•+~x'~,f-.L3T~Y.,~f tc.w~tf +~.r~':~.y.~~s.•' •`t ~ J'.rW..~«_Y,•y'~'i~ dq r~ r~ ~ ~ N yyY -•2 ~~f' ~,~p,- 'y~✓:}•ty~?~,~.~,~'~ •'s- . r, ~r p t4:Jh• •~•''+s'~ ~ r% _,4•v , td!'•.. i+ i J'~ ~tif it d;`'.°'a {~+~~'^d~~~1~i.~,~~i.~~~~~%`yi•+~~,~xt^.,yyS •'`~,'t,~`.'i .-?i" ..Na-,~,+.3 4~i ~~st'~i ~tyg•S a:,.~ r~>=;:ky s~`L<'4 l Ibl, "AA's i~ ti ,r trY :~'~p ,~w ~&,-e !•x +f ! '!tea y ,y-,i g! '~.LS i~ 1~ ! ~ ~t-,y ~„~~`W.•,Ciy~w .n..~Y.cL Y.: :u an.C: a~.'~~, 2',r "'J~~YZ• ~ • M%'.~~ti' C` • _ ~;X. I'Nt.l x' 4 .h p ~ ~L;~,;~•Y° r • .q~§ .4•i< ~ /y, yrq(' ~ ' (+".~i` ~ ~..2 , J .,"ik.:r.:;~..+~,~ ' r - ~ y u . • yfi f3i:'; G•'3 y 3 1• I n r.~"Q atL-w z * s~. _ ~vf~49. ~f 3, kly ! rr S. c ~ a l r - - r ia:~~/~ Mfr ~ ~`;l~ b low t rr~ f~y r , tiY~. . j~ a~ r j~ ~ G•~ Y ~ `4 a ~y }4.. 1 • ~.'i +7~ l..+Fl~.'a~ ~„y'rkF',~ J ~'r~ ,?~.~,r. l L L LL 1'S1'~'+ti. a Yj dS - x,„53•`3' yl t, ~y ,~r.+..~iMa, 1. nt. ! t ~ 9F~1 ,•a{ _ ,r;v Y~#r'=_ rt'~h r`0. eC i r'? wrf~y t ~~a♦ tM h_: r ~11 '`a~r:r?~ s „rir•~'y..' 'yt ~ r ~ , ff~ y~ p~l,i"~~;ri'`L`$7p ~sTl ti i. ~ .:.'7 F 'v ` ^c itC 1 4 l ! IL N~' Tcs Y'° r t t 'F'r 7f ~•*;'!`;?yl.~_ ' ~~~!t. -1 I,. w : •S 3 ,7 t j, r(...r~ p { ; r: , C 7 -:CY~'y' ~}.,,,c.':t•'fJ,~y`,.h~••A s•_''~ ' 2`L Its 7 '4 ; ~ Npr S . ~ i ' .e... ~ • ~ a', Y ~,r` ~ .'7 ~ { 'Y J''uN~~•y,' F ~ ~ ~ ' ~ t y L~. •':,f Tv y„ ~ L. 3' ~ it _ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ E , j f h lK~ t~ ' ~ r ytt r ~ q~ Pit.f~~ - i+~ • F 97~ ygaF* ~ ~ e l4: u~vs. rM 'M rY' 'yr' _ Y J +%'S~e S t r f l 1i lit f •~r Std .A3-'~p4~t1< !eml r^ ~t,p rip' ~ ~ ! r ~ ri + 3 a t 11, ff $ ' '"1 Rr ry yi r. S. ~r~, 1` r I)`I i ( Ip r~ 1 •x f F . M ~h• e { f~:~ tM1y\ll.,r 14FrA, ` d,t„9'r. a. [ ~ ~ • - .1 . - - ,r+~wfw~M1&.e.;etP3yt j,ty i'.~''~`'., •n` • y ~ t ~ ^ ti.. yr! •'rl 1 T F W 1 RD OEOORAl MIG IM lOe YATIOM aVaTeY m VICINITY MAP W VAC2002-00002 - Utilities Map co i MAPLELEAF ST e I i I; Tigard Area Map / A y N - - --ems--- _,-.~------e -e..--._.- i 0 100 200 300 Feat 1•242 feet i t 6Y 'I Giryof., InWrtadon on this map Is for general location only and should be verified wah me DevelopmerTt Ser Am DNUW. Q - 13125 SW NO Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 6394171 htlp:fA~.cWgard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Jan 13, 2003: Qlmagic\MAGIC03.APR LS -11W R1 al :ke .r A I I~ttF.:~ ~Itl+' r w ~ 11a ~.N1~-I Y, r y r w *.K `1 I „4 ~ Jam, ~ a• t W4F by ~•c r, 4r tt~ Ulkil 14.4 .14 .All LtVII31Ll Y 51 KIP ~F - OWL t - F~-ft ~`~"5"•'' - - - ouch from school View took'rg s homes ProFarty at adsacert t,...._. t Look cg west 0' A,ertie from gw 9 - , • , o~or'q Way rjw Z. r' sc".co'l2~ces _ 4 ;iew' G 9'::cv r'w s °weer Q0.. ~'f'I~C:~IQY•'f'r4'_ ~•J7ef :Y . > .•~s,',',:4"•s~ ~r south from 9chJJ' 'rce and h", ~,..F.i.. ~aooo,avg "S, t!tree<e LEGIBILITY STRIP •y~.~;`•: -k ~ r.,. .dc or scree' p ,~y.r~' Loo:.~rg eas' alorg sou''` s reef c.,C 7 r1 proPert`' Oak `.UW w .s .r s 90" Averse 1 5 Look,ng eos* toward 4erces :;r7... ;r: a< rNeer n. Y Agar rote gaP be :t z' 13 s_; y k t 'i'~ r~ +;'r vi- k fit i a ''s g Lco,,rg 'CST C. ~ rcc,r 5'fee' c' •~.c eg,frra o4 Oc~ cv r1 A 6 ' oe~,ra res~ C,,r9Oak ~~rco r'er Ir ~C t :f.. 10 kCrd5 '_~f C~Ir S LEGIBILITY STRIP 1 1 I . SINGLE FAMILY - I SINGLE.. FAMILY I SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY I 3 J d d U - SW LOCUST STREET - - , _ _ - - - - - o NEW 6' CHAIN NEW 6' CHAIN - LINT( FENCING LINK FENCING . _ O _ O - - - - 1+9R:TS:m7E - i I I 1 - 77.5' J U) + ,O UGUV OTaANYDRYFREGiNGL.>. 60'-0" MOPE 24. & unu4T EASEUMT SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 24 - 1 PER DEED D1_ Nola 3s2e2 R4.5 - R4.5 NEW - R4.5 W SINGLE FA . R W RE Aua 23. lees 1 1 R4.5 ~I ,Z I J j I16' PRIVACY I I FENCING 0 I + Z- y I s I 1 Ne9'4e21' 1 Q CC SD.07' ~ +~J ~ U NEW 6' FIR ACY - I------------ j- o~ < SINGLE FA In- FENCING II I I gHw o I R4-5 PARKING STRUCTURE b I I g S 11 EMS NG TO BE DUMSNED I I w l m+ MUE 1 - 0 w f --N W 6' Cf1fAIN Na9.3aoo'E zboooi' I- U 1 N r NEW LANDSCAPE STRIP LI K -FENING - AND SIDEWALK FULL D ltA~130609' ' z R-seo.oo•~-~ I' SETBACK Z LENGTH OF STREET 20 - r E_~, D• I I F SEE DRAWING 4.5&6 BE CH.N ros~'o-E 1 En50NG 9rrtpNO TO BE DEYOEI9iEp I NEW 6' C _ x SINGLE FA ~,P 8 _ O+ I i I LINK FEN NG NG - w R4.5 L---------------- --..r------------- -P wE11.11EAD~~ 1+ 11 1 1 1 1 q I 1 1 INSTITUTIONAL USE 1 1 m _ / i 1 w I j Q g I I R4.5 - T y( i i PLAY FIELD n I I 1 1 i° SINGLE Ff 6. Ra.S s, / k!T '~o FDIC PARKING LOT FH 01 i -i - - J I MUE 1 1 EJUSTWG BUILDIN TO BE DE40t15NED -1 - - RASH AND 1 1 1 OI_T 1 YCLING 1~-_•J_ I. T I 1 / b ❑ ® L-- / wo o P Ci / N 1 O -1 LOADING o9roz'1 • i e n.o x N I _WWAVIVOL OAK I / v.Nal 01•E L .eY ' • : 20 0 . 5i R I 3 r-- 1 --Q w SINGLE FA 2 ,Q COURT - I I a0 R4.5 NEW LANDSCAPE STRIP S• O _ Y y rx i e rF? 9• COVERED WATER UNE E.E4ENT AND SIDEWALK FULL PIAY 1 PER OooR 19a, PAGE 54 1 ( I LENGTH OF STREET - I •P' RECdiDm DEC. 9. t9a0 1 FHI c9 SEE DRAWING 4.5&6 (PLAY AREA 1 3 0 _ 1-_---_--_ ' I - - / EMTs4G BMDWG j I w PARKING LOT I 1 ,I•, ,k,k >'d°?'ir'~ - _ 1 To eE DE4a~sRED 1 In _ t PI SIN LE FE mi L - - m l R4.S 1 1 U i I NG RUMNG I t g 9 - To eE RE40VE0 I COURT COURT J CONC NEW 6 C AIN~ O I-NEW L 34. B1KE5 yu , 74 i SIDEWALK LINK FEn NG I a 77 I / h 1 EtOSTWG BINU)WG I a I m F 44, .S & 1 --1 0 / / 1 TO 3E P.EMO FD I 1 Ij(S,A~j r r' r I 1 a ¢ I 38 1 ~p aSuY 4~ 1 C m O 3 au• / BUS I A[1MINI Tiyi~ I "Llr ~r5~~,,,,~',M1 F r,Kr?*~e ,1~,., 1" SINGLE FA / r6 z4 z'C O LANE w I. aaa~~~ Ig =t` 'y -i .r 1 fY ,c r .f 'w 'F"'4 . a t MUR 1 7 oa' 6.~r. ` r t L' z Ifs `v » t 2}I' ~}Y'~GI:A$5RI d~ W~INGTtr?+' i m P~ _ ~4}r 4 1 k. ~ P E Y L) rJ \ I ! k r d'I I• 4 r aa}\ V tYSf ,,7~ t' '~j 'T.Mr WL N 7 I Yp ~ yr 76'-.0.. I t a - s ? ~ ~ lit 1~ ~t L sb~s u6~Nr w1,..;4 ~x ~.r - ~ 0 I !f' ~r 1?ED~STRWN r t Lr r18jC 9ROOM Y v £ ° k K v; ° v - - - - , r l R2H 47 ,n .7g~ 0 r ACGESS ROUTE ~rIE01~{r ~'~t ''La,~"sa.~~~ ~~`Fr~f~i"~~a~~T`~` ~ ur}33 j y 5 P 30'-0' I Y r su#se..`,V :rrir ,a1j?j a~a~yr ~t "r?i z I • SINGLE FA ~gc_ . 1 1 o if~88,-6.. I MUR 1 M E.N+R e ° _I NEW CONC 'P• o NEW CONC 5,rz~'1„'.t4,1Z'rb.-c~,.. f P_ 1 SiDEWALIC <L FH - I 20' SETBACK SIDEWALK R<_T _ _ - - - PRIVACY FENCING ALL ALONG SOUTH PROP LI E - - - 1 + + + _ + + - Q C---- + T o ' SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY I I I ..I i - - MUE I I MUE 1 I ` MUE 1 d I' MUE 1 \ MUE:1 / PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT 00 0110 1 1 t PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREAS I SEE SHEET 4 FOR STREET TREE AND SCREENED AND BUFFERED AREAS N 3 pENT PLAN SITE DEVELOI- SELIG LEE RUED XSITE METZGER ELEMENTARY SELIG /LEE / l~UEDA 3 TIGARD - TUALATIN S.D. 23-J A R C H I T E C T S 8t P L A N N E R S zts s. w. Ash s:raes, x°°m zot - Proretead, orogDU 97204 - (503) 224 - 0173 FEB 14 03 10255 90TH AVE., TIGARD, OREGON