City Council Packet - 05/13/2003CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
May 13, 2003
COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED
H.UEANNODOCSICCPKTI
13126 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
Agenda Item No. "47
Meeting of Co I i7
COUNCIL MINUTES
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING
May 13, 2003
Mayor Griffith called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
Council Present: Mayor Griffith; Councilors Dirksen, Moore, Sherwood, and Wilson
EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 6:30
p.m. to discuss current or potential litigation under ORS 192.660 (1 h).
Executive Session concluded at 6:59 p.m.
• STUDY SESSION
o Insurance Coverage for Council
Risk Manager Loreen reviewed types of policies, the carrier, and coverage for City
Council, including liability, bonding and workers compensation. City Attorney Ramis
reviewed the layers of protection:
1) City will indemnify Council members to the extent that Council members were
performing their duties.
2) A tort claim must be brought against the City, not an individual.
3) Council members have statutory immunity for policy decisions (virtually anything
on a Council agenda where discretion must be exercised). Make sure decisions are
made as a "council" not as an individual.
4) City provices insurance coverage protection.
To keep protection:
1) Act as a body
2) Exercise good faith in decision making
3) Don't engage in self-dealing (personal gain)
Attorney Ramis briefly reviewed ethics violations.
Special areas to be aware of.
1) No insurance coverage for "takings" cases
2) A council member can be personally liable for unauthorized expenditures (using
city funds to promote advocacy on ballot measures, personal expenses, or not
following budget laws)
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 13, 2003 Page 1
o Administrative Items School Student
■ Mayor was "shadowed during the Council meeting by High
Katherine Parr-Philipson.
Katherine Parr-Philipson was introduced to the City Council.
■ Paul Brems Resolution - Council agreed to consider a proposed resolution
acknowledging the efforts of Paul Brems during his tenure as the Tigard High
School Student Envoy to the City of Tigard. A draft resolution was distributed
to Council members who considered the resolution during the Business
Meeting before the Visitor's Agenda.
■ Consider whether to place a resolution for Council to consider opposing
formation of an electric people's utility district (PUD) in Multnomah County
(Proposed Resolution distributed to Council).
Council agreed to consider the resolution as a non-agenda item during the
business meeting.
■ City Recorder Review - On May 20, 2003, Council members will return
questionnaires about the City Recorder's performance review to the City
Manager.
Council will return questionnaires by May 20.
■ Consent Agenda
Councilor Wilson noted questions about how franchise agreements are
structured. After brief discussion, City Manager suggested that franchise
agreements be placed on a future agenda for Council review.
■ Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force - Membership
Council will consider new members for continuing work that needs to be
accomplished.
BUSINESS MEETING
1.1 Mayor Griffith called the City Council 8z Local Contract Review Board
meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
1.2 Roll Call: Mayor Griffith, Councilors Dirksen, Moore, Sherwood and Wilson
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications ez Liaison Reports: None
Page 2
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 13, 2003
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items: Discuss and consider the
Council's opinion about the formation of an electric people's utility district
(PUD) in Multnomah County. (See Agenda Item No. 8)
2. PROCLAMATION
2.1 Mayor Griffith proclaimed the Week of May 18 to 24, 2003, as Emergency
Medical Services Week.
Shane Ryan, Communications Director, and Sue Higgins, First Responder,
from Metro West Ambulance noted they appreciated the City's support. A
plaque was presented to the Mayor.
➢ CONSIDER A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING AND COMMENDING PAUL
BREMS FOR HIS EFFORTS AS THE TIGARD HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT ENVOY TO
THE CITY OF TIGARD
Motion by Councilor Sherwood, seconded by Councilor Dirksen to approve
Resolution No. 0-3-14.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-14 - RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING AND
COMMENDING PAUL BREMS FOR HIS EFFORTS AS THE TIGARD HIGH
SCHOOL STUDENT ENVOY TO THE CITY OF TIGARD
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council:
Mayor Griffith -
Yes
Councilor Dirksen -
Yes
Councilor Moore -
Yes
Councilor Sherwood -
Yes
Councilor Wilson -
Yes
3. VISITOR'S AGENDA
Tigard High School Student Envoy Paul Brems
Paul Brems introduced Angela Jensen, who is the Student Envoy to the City for
the upcoming school year. Mr. Brems issued a report on student activities to the
Council.
Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce President-Elect Dan Murphy
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 13, 2003 Page 3
Dan Murphy reported the Shining Stars Banquet was a great success. He noted
upcoming Chamber of Commerce events.
4. CONSENT AGENDA: Motion by Councilor Dirksen, seconded by Councilor
Wilson, to approve the Consent Agenda as follows:
4.1 Approve Council Minutes for March 18 and 25, and April 8 and 15, 2003
4.2 Receive and File:
a. Annual Solid Waste Financial Report Findings
b. 2003 State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Grant
4.3 Approve Submittal of a Transportation and Growth Management Grant
Application for Preparing a Downtown Redevelopment Plan -
Resolution No. 03 - 15
4.4 Local Contract Review Board:
a. Award Contract for the Construction of Embedded Crosswalk Lighting
System on Bonita Road to North Star Electrical Contractors
b. Award Contract for Engineering Services for the Design and Construction
of the New 550 Foot Reservoir #2 (Rider School Reservoir) to Murray,
Smith and Associates, Inc.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council:
Mayor Griffith -
Yes
Councilor Dirksen -
Yes
Councilor Moore -
Yes
Councilor Sherwood -
Yes
Councilor Wilson -
Yes
5. UPDATE ON NEW LIBRARY
Library Director Barnes updated Council. The design is complete. Construction is
scheduled to begin in June. The project remains on schedule and within budget.
Final designs and floor plans were presented to the Council. The groundbreaking
ceremony is scheduled for Saturday, May 17, 10 a.m. on the new library site.
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 13, 2003 Page 4
6. INTRODUCTION TO THE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (CAP)
Assistant to the City Manager Newton presented the staff report. A new program
called the Community Assessment Program (CAP) was initiated on a trial basis in
January. The program is aimed at validating that city employees and elected officials
have a complete understanding of the existing conditions within the city on a
neighborhood-by-neighborhood basis, and at ensuring that issues are addressed
promptly, efficiently and in an equitable manner.
The city was divided into 45 areas that generally correspond to the police department
patrol grids. A schedule was developed so that each Wednesday afternoon, a team of
employees covers a different area of the city.
The next step in the process will be a community report, which will be issued within
30 days of the walk, ideally to a community connector, posted on the web, and
summarized in the Cityscape. Staff also proposed to publicize the CAP schedule and
set up an email account for citizens to submit comments, suggestions, or questions.
Council indicated their support of this program. Councilor Moore said that it's a
"terrific idea." Council would like to be kept informed of the walk schedule.
7, DISCUSSION OF THE STREET MAINTENANCE FEE
City Engineer Duenas presented the staff report and background information. He
reviewed the answers to Council questions, which were provided in a report and
submitted to the Council in their meeting packet materials. Discussion followed on
the allocation of the fee between residential and commercial. Staff proposes a fee
based on trip generation, which is a 78/28% split for commercial/residential
allocations. Mr. Duenas referred to the 15-year program for street maintenances,
which was based on the Pavement Management System document. This 15-year
program will be redistributed to the Council.
City Attorney Ramis reviewed the difference between a "tax" and a "fee." A fee is a
carefully tailored charge that relates to the service received. Council members
reiterated that if a fee is adopted, then it should be reviewed regularly along with
other city fees.
City Manager noted that the proposed street maintenance also will take care of right-
of-way maintenance, including sidewalks, on collector and arterials. Other cities'
street maintenance fees do not include this right-of-way maintenance provision. There
was discussion on this aspect of the proposed Tigard street maintenance fee on
whether it is fair to other citizens to provide this maintenance for arterials and
collectors. Council Dirksen noted the distinction whereby residents along arterials and
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 13, 2003 Page 5
collectors have double frontage. They are required to maintain their sidewalks and
right-of-way landscaping in front of their homes; however, often sidewalks and
landscaping along an arterial or collector street is located behind the homes and is not
easily accessed.
Council will continue its deliberation on this matter on May 27. City Manager
Monahan asked Council to submit to staff, as soon as possible, any additional
questions they might have.
8. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2002-03
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET
City Engineer Duenas presented the staff report. The proposed amendments to the
capital improvement program (CIP) were to add the Bonita Road reconstruction
project, delete the North Dakota Street project, and separate the Hall Boulevard/Wall
Street intersection project from the Wail Street Local Improvement District. No
changes in the overall CIP budget will occur as a result of the above amendments.
Motion by Councilor Wilson, seconded by Councilor Sherwood, to adopt Resolution
No. 03-16.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-16 - A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE FY 2002-03
CIP (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) BUDGET
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council:
Mayor Griffith
Councilor Dirksen
Councilor Moore
Councilor Sherwood
Councilor Wilson
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
9. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS: None
10. NON AGENDA ITEMS
Council discussed the formation of an electric people's utility district (PUD) in
Multnomah County. This matter had also been discussed on April 15 by the Council.
The Mayor advised he would like to see the City take a stance in opposition to the
formation of a PUD, since it appeared that a PUD would be of no benefit to the City
of Tigard. Councilor Wilson commented that the Tigard community has been well
served by PGE. Mayor Griffith read the proposed resolution in its entirety.
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 13, 2003 Page 6
Motion by Councilor Dirsken, seconded by Councilor Sherwood, to adopt Resolution
No. 03-17.
RESOLUTION N0.03-17 I~ D SRESOLUTION PPOSING FORMATION OF TRICT (PUD ON MU TN MAH COUNTY AN
ELECTRIC PEOPLE'S UT
The motion was approved by a majority vote of Council:
Mayor Griffith -
Yes
Councilor Dirksen -
Yes
Councilor Moore -
Abstained
Councilor Sherwood -
Yes
Councilor Wilson -
Yes
Council reconvened into Study Session to continue to review the following administrative
items:
➢ Board and Committee Interviews - Review and discuss schedule (information was
distributed to Council)
Council discussed the boards/committees that need to have members appointed or
reappointed. Interview schedules will be developed to address the following board
and committee vacancies:
Library Board - first week in June
Park 8z Recreation advisory board - late June or early July
Budget Committee - no urgency since bulk of activity will not occur until next
year
➢ City Council/Washington County Joint Meeting
No meeting date has been set; it is likely it will be August 19.
➢ Library Groundbreaking - May 17, 10 a.m.
Council was reminded about the groundbreaking ceremony
➢ Police Community Meeting: May 15, 6:30 p.m.
Councilor Moore will attend this meeting.
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 13, 2003 Page 7
➢ Tour of City facilities
Councilors Sherwood, Wilson and Dirksen expressed interest in a police ride-along.
Police Department Staff will contact these Council members.
➢ Council Contact Information
Council received a listing of telephone numbers for Council members. They will
review and advise Administration Staff of any changes.
➢ Management Cost of Living Allowance
City Manager noted the budget will propose a 2.5% management cost of living
allowance for next fiscal year.
➢ City Manager Review
Within the next two weeks Council will fill out rating forms, which will be compiled
for the City Manager to review. Council will meet to discuss goals for the City
Manager. It was suggested that the goal-setting discussion take place after the business
meeting on May 27 or June 10.
Other items
- A person sleeping on the railroad tracks in the City of Tigard was hit and killed by
a train last Sunday.
- The Mayor will attend the trail dedication on May 30, 10:45, Fowler Middle
School.
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Not held
12. ADJOURNMENT: 9:36 p.m.
Attest:
yor, i
Date: rLD, 1
SADKCATHY\CC%030513.DOC
GL L J2_ I.P
t eri eat ey, Ity ecor er
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - May 13, 2003 Page 8
e4 tu. Recardcr
Revised 5/13/03 Mayor's Agenda
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on
the beginning of that agenda
If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the
item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set
for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager.
Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present
by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard
in any order after 7:30 p.m.
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired the Council hearing and should
P ease
scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior
call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications
Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;
and
Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow
as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the
Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-
684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
page 1
COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 13, 2003
AGENDA
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MAY 13, 2003
6:30 PM
STUDY SESSION
> INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR COUNCIL
Administration Staff
> DISCUSS THE PROCESS FOR THE CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW
Administration Staff
EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to
discuss labor negotiations and current or potential litigation under ORS 192.660(l d)
and (1 h). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from
the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive
Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information
discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action
or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public.
7:30 PM
1. BUSINESS MEETING
1.1 Call to Order - City Council at Local Contract Review Board
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications 81 Liaison Reports
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
7:35 PM
2. PROCLAMATIONS
2.1 Proclaim the Week of May 18 to 24, 2003, as Emergency Medical Services
Week
Mayor Griffith
Mayor: Emergency medical services personnel provide an invaluable service to our
community. These highly-trained professionals stand ready to provide life-saving
care to those in need 24 hours a day, seven days a week. In recognition of their
dedication, skill, and the integral role they play as the initial responders in a
medical emergency, and with the concurrence of this City Council, the City of
COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 13, 2003 page 2
Tigard declares the week of May 199, 2003, as Emergency Medical Services
Week.
7:40 PM
3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please)
ga'r. dl gi S oo Stude~i Envoy PainlBrems
TieardArea Chamber of Commerce President ~EIE
7:45 PM
4. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted
in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be
removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to:
4.1 Approve Council Minutes for March 18 and 25, and April 8 and 15, 2003
4.2 Receive and File:
a. Annual Solid Waste Financial Report Findings
b. 2003 State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Grant
4.3 Approve Submittal of a Transportation and Growth Management Grant
Application for Preparing a Downtown Redevelopment Plan -
Resolution No. F-y' 5
4.4 Local Contract Review Board:
a. Award Contract for the Construction of Embedded Crosswalk Lighting
System on Bonita Road to North Star Electrical Contractors
b. Award Contract for Engineering Services for the Design and
Construction of the New 550 Foot Reservoir #2 (Rider School
Reservoir) to Murray, Smith and Associates, Inc.
• Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested
to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered
immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need
discussion.
COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 1312003 page 3
Presentation by Metro West Ambulance -
Shane Ryan, Communications Director, and Sue Higgins, First Responder,
from Metro West Ambulance will do a brief presentation.
7:50 PM
S. UPDATE ON NEW LIBRARY
a, Staff Report: Library Staff
b, Council Discussion
d
oc
J
m
J
8:00 PM
6, INTRODUCTION TO THE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (CAP)
a, Staff Report: Administration Staff
b, Council Discussion
8:20 PM
7. DISCUSSION OF THE STREET MAINTENANCE FE
a, Staff Report: Engineering Staff
b, Council Discussion
THE FISCAL YEAR 2002-0
9:20 PM
g, CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AMENDING3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUD
a, Staff Report: Engineering Staff
b, Council Discussion
C. Council Consideration: Resolution No. V3~ =
Councilor. 1 move for adoption of the proposed resolution.
Councilor. I second the motion.
Mayor: Will the City Recorder please read the number and title of the Resolution.
City Recorder: (Reads as requested.)
Mayor: Is there any discussion?
Mayor (after
discussion): All of those in favor of adopting Resolution No. , please say "aye.
Councilors:
Mayor: All of those opposed to adopting Resolution No.----, please say "nay. "
Councilors:
Resolution No. _(is adopted or fails) by a (unanimous, or however votes
Mayor:
were split) vote.
page 4
COUNCIL AGENDA -MAY 131 2003
9:35 PM
9. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
9:40 PM
10. NON AGENDA ITEMS
9:45 PM
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session.
an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be
announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and
those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news
media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3),
but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held
for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive
Sessions are closed to the public.
9:50 PM
12. AD]OURNMENT
LW D KCATHY\CCA\030513). DOC
page 5
COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 13, 2003
~sr
Z
O
y
Q O
O~
vW
0
V
2
U
O
O
C
U
Q.
Cl)
O
Cl)
O
N
U
C
(D
3
y
C
U
O
c
m
a~
`o
J
City of Tigard
Capital Improvement
Program
Budget Amendments
May 13.2003
Bonita Road Reconstruction
■ Collector road
■ Carries over 12,000 vehicles per day
■ Served as a detour route during Durham Road
construction
■ Severe rutting and cracking observed
■ Geotechnical investigation confirmation
■ Needs to be reconstructed as soon as possible
Proposed CIP Amendments
■ Amendment No. 1
■ Add Bonita Road Reconstruction
Project
■ Delete North Dakota Street Project
■ Amendment No. 2
e Separate the Hall Blvd/Wall Street
Intersection project from the Wall
Street Local Improvement District
■ No changes in the overall CIP Budget as
a result of the amendments
Bonita Road
~e
1~ -
Bonita Road
1
Amendment No. I
■ Add the Bonita Road Reconstruction Project to
the FY 2002-03 CIP
■ Delete the North Dakota Street Project
■ Allocate the funding from the North Dakota
Project to the Bonita Road Project
■ No change in the overall CIP Budget
Johnson Street Overlay
Separation of Hall/Wall
Intersection from Wall Street LID
■ Wall Street Local Improvement District
■ Initial Report to Council on March 11, 2003
■ Preliminary Engineer's Report being prepared
■ Report will recommend the feasibility of forming
the LID
■ LID formation process is being followed
■ Council may decide not to form the LID
North Dakota Street
Separation of Hall/Wall Intersection
from Wall Street LID
■ Hall Blvd/Wall Street Intersection
■ Currently part of the Wall Street LID Project
■ New Library and Fanno Pointe Condominiums
need one common access to Hall
■ Hall/Wall intersection and approaches will be
designed and constructed as a City project
to
Wall/Hall Intersection Project
HALL BLVD / MALL STREET
~I
Ir
2
Amendment No. 2
■ $300,000 budgeted in FY 2002-03 CIP under
Wall Street LID Fund
■ $200,000 for Hall/Wall Intersection (TIF Funds)
■ $1 oo,ooo for wall street LID (TIP funds)
■ No change in FY 2002-03 CIP Budget
■ Funding for construction of Hall/Wall
Intersection will be requested under FY 2003-
04 CIP
Staff Recommendation
m Approve the resolution for the
CEP Budget Amendments as
requested
Amendment No. 2
■ Separate the intersection project from the LID
■ Create a new project for the Hall Blvd/Wall Street
Intersection and Approaches
■ Intersection and approaches will be constructed
using Traffic Impact Fee funding plus library and
Fanno Pointe funding
■ Wall Street LID - Complete the Preliminary
Engineer's Report
Planning Commission Approval
■ Planning Commission approved the
Proposed CIP Budget Amendments
at April 21, 2003 meeting
■ Planning Commission recommends
City Council approval
City of Tigard
Capital Improvement
Program
Budget Amendments
May 13, 2003
3
Wall Street )LID
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - - VISITOR'S AGENDA
DATE : MAY 13, 2003
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) from
you r issues
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The
concerns through staff t Po hear lease contact the CtyeManager
not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve
prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
TOPIC 77 FA CONTACTED
NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE
Page I
VISITOR'S AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM NO..3 - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE : MAY 13, 2003
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) hear
other issues
you
from
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. concerns throughs tall t P ease contact the City Manager
not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your
prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED
NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE
Page 2
VISITOR'S AGENDA
DATE :MAY 13, 2003
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 - VISITOR'S AGENDA
IL
U1
J
Page 3
VISITOR'S AGENDA
s
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Council
You issues
from
wishes
Please contact the City Manager
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. Tcerns through staff to hear
not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your con
. s _11 .I-_ Thank vau.
AGENDA
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION/ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS FOR REVIEW
MAY 13, 2003 - 6:30 PM
The Study Session is held in the Red Rock Creek Conference Room. Enter at the back of Town Hall. The
Council encourages interested citizens to attend all or part of the meeting. If the number of attendees exceeds
the capacity of the Conference Room, the Council may move the Study Session to the Town Hall.
• STUDY SESSION
> INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR COUNCIL
• Administration Staff
> DISCUSS THE PROCESS FOR THE CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW
• Administration Staff
• EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss current or
potential litigation under ORS 192.660 (1 h). All discussions are confidential and those present may
disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive
Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No
Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision.
Executive Sessions are closed to the public.
ADMINSITRATIVE ITEMS
o Mayor to be shadowed by High School Student Katherine Parr-Philipson
o Paul Brems Resolution - Consider during Business Meeting before the Visitor's Agenda (Proposed
Resolution distributed to Council)
o Consider whether to place a resolution for Council to consider opposing formation of an electric
people's utility district (PUD) in Multnomah County (Proposed Resolution distributed to Council)
o City Recorder Review - Questionnaires to be collected May 20, 2003
o Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force - Membership
o Board and Committee Interviews - Review and discuss schedule (Information distributed to
Council)
o City Council/Washington County Joint Meeting
o Library Groundbreaking -May 17, 10 a.m.
o Police Community Meeting: May 15, 6:30 p.m. Metzger Elementary, Councilor Moore
o Tour of City facilities
o Council Contact Information - Please review and update (Information distributed to Council)
o Management COLA
o Billboard Appeal - LUBA
o City Attorney will explain during the Street Maintenance Fee Discussion the difference between
a "fee" and a "tax"
Executive Session -
The Public Meetings Law authorizes governing bodies to meet in executive session in certain
limited situations (ORS 192.660). An "executive session" is defined as "any meeting or part of
a meeting of a governing body, which is closed to certain persons for deliberation on certain
matters."
Permissible Purposes for Executive Sessions:
192.660 (1) (a) - Employment of public officers, employees and agents,
if the body has satisfied certain prerequisites.
192.660 (1) (b) -
Discipline of public officers and employees (unless affected person requests
to have an open hearing).
192.660 (1) (c) -
To consider matters pertaining to medical staff of a public hospital.
192.660 (1) (d) -
Labor negotiations. (News media can be excluded in this instance.)
192.660(l) (e) -
Real property transaction negotiations.
192.660 (1) (f) -
Exempt public records - to consider records that are "exempt by law from
public inspection." These records are specifically identified in the Oregon
Revised Statutes.
192-660(l) (g) -
Trade negotiations - involving matters of trade or commerce in which the
governing body is competing with other governing bodies.
192.660(l) (h) -
Legal counsel - Executive session are appropriate for consultation with
counsel concerning legal rights and duties regarding current litigation or
litigation likely to be filed.
192.660(l) (i) -
To review and evaluate, pursuant to standards, criteria, and policy
directives adopted by the governing body, the employment-related
performance of the chief executive officer, a public officer, employee or
staff member unless the affected person requests an open hearing. The
standards, criteria and policy directives to be used in evaluating chief
executive officers shall be adopted by the governing body in meetings open
to the public in which there has been an opportunity for public comment.
192.660 (1) (j) -
Public investments - to carry on negotiations under ORS Chapter 293 with
private persons or businesses regarding proposed acquisition, exchange or
liquidation of public investments.
192.660 (1) (k)-
Relates to health professional regulatory board.
I:WDNACATFMCOUNCIL\CCLIST10300422.DOC
AGENDA ITEM # n
FOR AGENDA OF 5/13/03
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Study 5eess✓ -insurance wvvia •
PREPARED BY: Loreen Mil DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
This will be a short briefing for Council highlighting the City's insurance coverage for City Council and how
Council can o to to protect their right to coverage under the insurance policies.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Council will develop a basic understanding of the insurance coverage available how to preserve coverage under the
policies.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City purchases insurance to provide protection in case of a loss. While it is good to have insurance in place, it
is important to understand there are limits and exclusions in the insurance policies.
Information will be presented by Loreen Mills, Tigard's Risk Manager, noting those insurance policies that
specifically provide coverage for City Council and the limits and exclusions in those policies. Tim Ramis, Tigard's
City Attorney, will then advise Council about ways to protect their ability to preserve the coverage of those policies
while taking action and making decisions.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
N/A
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
N/A
ATTACHMENT LIST
N/A
FISCAL NOTES
In 2002-03, $564,198 was budgeted for citywide insurance casualty/property coverage (does not include any
employee benefits).
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 03-
A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING AND COMMENDING PAUL BREMS FOR HIS EFFORTS AS
THE TIGARD HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT ENVOY TO THE CITY OF TIGARD
WHEREAS, City of Tigard elected and appointed officials have benefited fr om Tigard High School
Student Envoy Paul Brems' regular updates about student activities; and
WHEREAS, Paul Brems' updates presented the community with information about the positive activities
occurring at Tigard High School; and
WHEREAS, this year's Tigard High School student leaders are to be highly praised for the work they
accomplished this school year as they coordinated activities to benefit students, faculty, and community
members; and
WHEREAS, Paul Brems has set a fine example for future Student Envoy representatives to the City of
Tigard.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
SECTION 1: The City of Tigard extends to Paul Brems an expression of appreciation for his
exemplary service as Tigard High School Student Envoy.
SECTION 2: The City of Tigard extends to Paul Brems its best wishes for good health, success, and
prosperity upon his graduation from Tigard High.
PASSED: This day of
2003.
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 03-
A RESOLUTION OPPOSING FORMATION OF AN ELECTRIC PEOPLE'S UTILITY DISTRICT
(PUD) IN MULTNOMAH COUNTY
WHEREAS, the PUD petitioners have stated they plan to start the same process for Washington, Marion,
Polk, Yamhill, and Clackamas Counties; and
WHEREAS, the PUD breaks up the PGE service territory, severing up to 32 percent of the current PGE
electric load from the company, which would cause a possible cost burden on the remaining customers
outside of Multnomah County; and
WHEREAS, a PUD would add uncertainty to an economy that is alredy strained and further promotes the
view that the Metro area is "anti-business" and sends the wrong messge to businesses considering the
Willamette Valley area a place to locate or expand, at a time when the Oregon economy is struggling; and,
WHEREAS, local governments face the prospect of losing millions of dollars annually in property taxes
and franchise fees paid by PGE and Pacific Power; and,
WHEREAS, the new utlility will not have access to lower-price BPA preference power in the foreseeable
future and even when it does become available BPA rates have increased 45 percent in the last two years
and are due to increase another 15 percent this year; and,
WHEREAS, a start-up government utility would almost certainly begin operations with no power
generation and would be dependent on the volatile wholesale market for nearly all power supply. It would
sever Multnomah County from the integrated generating, transmission and distribution systems of PGE and
Pacific Power.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council opposes the formation of the PUD and the subsequent
condemnation and forced government takeover of the Portland General Electric's
distribution system assets in Multnomah County.
SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage.
PASSED: This day of
2003.
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
I:WDVPACKET'03\20030513\PUD RESOLUTION.DOC
RESOLUTION NO. 03 -
Page 1
May 5, 2003
Page 1 of 2
PUD Overview: A Brief Description of the proposed Multnomah PUD.
• Chief Petitioners: Judith Barnes, SE Portland; Eric Dover NE Portland; Frank
Gearhart, Gresham; Joan Horton, SW Portland; Scott Forrester, Gresham; Elizabeth
Trojan, SW Portland; Bill Michtom, SW Portland.
• Website: Oregon Public Power Coalition www.oppc.net
• Signatures submitted and verified: February, 12 /19 2003
• Authority: ORS 261- People's Utility Districts
• Area: All of Multnomah County, except the areas within the boundaries of Rockwood
PUD and Interlachen PUD. Affected areas are currently served by investor-owned
utilities, Portland General Electric and Pacific Power.
• Process: The Oregon Office of Energy (OOE) held a hearing April 7, 2003 under
ORS 261.151 which required the OOE, with the "advice and assistance of the
Oregon Public Utilities Commission, to prepare a concise report showing the
availability and cost of power resources, tax consequences and any other
information considered by the Administrator to be relevant to the proposed formation
of the district." Report required to be delivered to the county by April 21. The
hearing lasted approximately four hours.
County Commission duties: County commission has two responsibilities:
1.) Determine the final boundaries;
2.) Set an election date.
The election is county wide; however, the vote within a political boundary
determines the inclusion or exclusion of that municipality. (ORS261.110) Simply
put, if Fairview voters approve the measure they are part of the PUD, and if
Wood Village voters reject the measure, they remain with PGE. There are at
least 64 different combinations possible. Five PUD board members are elected
from the top five vote recipients from a slate of candidates for office. If a winning
candidate is in an area that rejects the PUD, they cannot serve on the Board.
Finally, the PUD election includes a one-time special levy, 3 mills per million
dollars, or approximately $127,000 to finance an engineering study.
• Election date is most likely at the November general election. Petitioners have
promoted September 16 as the date of the election; however, it appears that filing
deadlines will be difficult, if not impossible to meet.
May 5, 2003
Page 2 of 2
Key issues raised in the OOE report:
1. Power Resources: PUD does not have authority to condemn the thermal generating
stations of the two companies. Proponents claim that hydroelectric facilities can be
condemned; not accurate if remaining customers are deemed to be harmed. Access
to BPA preference power is not available for the simple reason that there is none.
PUD would have to go to market to supply their customers or build new generation.
2. Rates: Above discussion influences rates. 100% of power supply from a volatile
market. Add costs to purchase and compensatory damages. No precedent in the US
or Oregon for condemnation at book value. Some multiple of book, not less than 1.5
nor more than 5.5 times book in Oregon history. Anything above book is not allowed
in rates of private utility. Public would be responsible for above book in a public
ownership scenario.
3. Tax consequences: Question whether the cost of capital would be less than PGE or
Pacific is debatable. Availability of tax exempt debt is subject to federal caps and at
the expense of housing and economic development projects statewide. Not likely to
release the entire amount for a PUD in Multnomah County were it even available.
See Randall Edwards, State Treasure, submission to the OOE record.
PUD is subject to property taxes, but not state or federal income taxes. Franchise
fee requirements unclear although, currently, most PUD's agree to pay a franchise
fee.
There are many other issues, but these are the ones specifically identified by statute for
consideration. The complete OOE report, with submissions, addresses important and
expensive considerations beyond the narrow scope addressed in statute. Report is
located on OOE website: hftp://www.eneLgy.state.or.us/
Judy Crafton
PGE Government Affairs Rep, Washington County
iudy craftonCa)-pgn.com
503-464-8561
DRAFT 4 Sample City Resolution
RESOLUTION OPPOSING
THE FORMATION OF AN ELECTRIC PEOPLE'S UTILITY DISTRICT (PUD)
IN MULTNOMAH COUNTY
WHEREAS, Portland General Electric (PGE) has been serving the Portland area for over
100 years and PacifiCorp has been serving the Portland area for nearly 100 years; and,
WHEREAS, condemnation of these two private businesses through establishment of an
entirely new government entity with independent taxing powers is a distraction the
community does not need as it struggles to deal with maintaining existing businesses and
government services; and,
WHEREAS, condemnation sends the wrong messages to businesses looking to invest in
the community; and,
WHEREAS, a PUD would add uncertainty to an economy that is already severely
strained and further promote the view that the Portland area is "anti-business;" and,
WHEREAS, local government services face the prospect of losing as much as $40
million annually in taxes and franchise fees paid by PGE and PacifiCorp; and,
WHEREAS, Multnomah County schools stand to lose approximately $1.4 million a year
in energy conservation funds that could help reduce operating costs, worsening the school
budget crisis; and,
WHEREAS, energy conservation and renewable programs in Oregon stand to lose an
estimated $10-15 million a year in public purpose funds; and,
WHEREAS, a start up government utility would need to go deeply into debt to acquire
the facilities of the two companies and such debt would have to be repaid either through
rates or through additional taxes; and,
WHEREAS, a PUD condemnation proceeding will result in protracted litigation taking
years and millions of dollars to resolve; and,
WHEREAS, creating a new government utility could cost the Portland area thousands of
private sector jobs and create a negative impact on the overall economy; and,
WHEREAS, a start-up government utility would own little, if any power generation and
would be dependent on the volatile wholesale market for nearly all power supply; and,
WHEREAS, Multnomah County would no longer be served by the integrated generation,
transmission and distribution systems of PGE and PacifiCorp; and,
WHEREAS, the rate BPA charges government utilities has increased approximately 45
percent since September 2001 and is due to increase another 15 percent this year alone,
and unlike established public utilities, a start-up government utility would incur a
Targeted Adjustment Charge to compensate BPA for the cost of acquiring power in the
wholesale market; and,
WHEREAS, using the state's limited federally tax-exempt bonds to purchase PGE and
PacifiCorp's distribution system in Multnomah County would harm the state's low-
income housing and economic development programs and local efforts; and,
WHEREAS, PGE and PacifiCorp contribute nearly $1.7 million each year to local
charitable causes - contributions that are not charged to ratepayers; and,
WHEREAS, PGE and PacifiCorp have a demonstrated record for superior customer
service satisfaction and exceptional reliability performance; and,
WHEREAS, the proposal to form a new People's Utility District in Multnomah County
will increase uncertainty and risk for electric customers of PGE and PacifiCorp; and,
WHEREAS, The Multnomah PUD proposal offers not a single persuasive argument for
customers of PGE and PacifiCorp to support formation; and,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and the city council of the City
of opposes the formation of the PUD and the subsequent condemnation and
forced government takeover of the assets of PacifiCorp and Portland General Electric
distribution systems in Multnomah County.
Adopted by the Council:
Mayor
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Sample Resolution for City of Salem
RESOLUTION OPPOSING.
THE FORMATION OF AN ELECTRIC PEOPLE'S UTILITY DISTRICT (PUD)
IN MULTNOMAH COUNTY
Whereas the proposal to form a new People's Utility District (PUD) in Multnomah
County will increase uncertainty and risk for electric customers of Portland General
Electric (PGE); and,
Whereas PGE has been serving customers in 51 cities including the City of Salem for
more than 100 years; and,
WHEREAS, the PUD petitioners have stated they will begin the same process in Marion,
Clackamas and Washington Counties in the coming months; and,
WHEREAS, the PUD breaks up the PGE service territory, severing up to 32% of the
current PGE electric load from the company causing a possible cost burden on the
remaining customers outside of Multnomah County; and,
WHEREAS, PGE has a demonstrated record for superior customer service satisfaction
and exceptional reliability and safety performance and a PUD requires no regulatory
oversight by the Oregon Public Utility Commission with regard to rates, customer service
standards and reliability; and,
WHEREAS, the new utility will not have access to lower-price BPA preference power in
the foreseeable future and if the PUD eventually accesses BPA power those rates have
increased 45 percent in the last two years and are due to increase another 15 percent this
year; and,
WHEREAS, a start-up government utility would almost certainly begin operations with
no power generation and would be dependent on the volatile wholesale market for nearly
all power supply; and,
WHEREAS, a start up government utility would need to go deeply into debt to acquire
the facilities of the two companies and such debt would have to be repaid either through
rates or through additional taxes; and,
WHEREAS, a PUD would add uncertainty to an economy that is already severely
strained and further promotes the view that the Metro area is "anti-business" and sends
the wrong message to businesses considering the Willamette Valley area as a place to
locate or expand, at a time when the Oregon economy is struggling; and,
WHEREAS, using the state's limited federally tax-exempt bonds to purchase PGE's
distribution system in Multnomah County would harm the state's low-income housing
and economic development programs and local efforts; and,
Be It Resolved by the City of Salem:
That we, the City Council and Mayor, oppose the formation of the PUD and the
subsequent condemnation and forced government takeover of the assets of PGE's
distribution systems in Multnomah County.
Date
Mayor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
WHEREAS, Portland General Electric (PGE) is a privately-owned power utility
servicing much of northwest Oregon, including portions of Polk County; and
WHEREAS, PGE is presently owned by Enron Corporation which is in
bankruptcy and a defendant in numerous civil lawsuits and government enforcement
actions; and
WHEREAS, the continued viability of PGE is uncertain as a result of the financial
and legal problems currently befalling Enron Corporation; and
WHEREAS, Enron Corp. has authorized the sale of PGE via a competitive
auction process; and
WHEREAS, private entities, public entities, and a proposed public utility district
have expressed a desire to acquire PGE; now, therefore,
IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Polk County Board of Commissioners:
1. That the Polk County Board of Commissioners opposes the formation of a
public utility district and further opposes its expressed intent to thereafter
condemn PGE;
2. That the Polk County Board of Commissioners support the continued
ownership and operation of PGE by a qualified and responsible private entity;
3. That should ownership of PGE be acquired by a public entity the most
desirable option is the one that includes joint ownership and operation by all
impacted counties, including Polk County.
A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE FORMATION OF AN ELECTRIC
PEOPLE'S UTILITY DISTRICT (PUD) IN MULTNOMAH COUNTY
WHEREAS, the PUD petitions have stated they plan to start the same process
for Washington, Marion, Polk, Yamhill, and Clackamas Counties; and,
WHEREAS, the PUD breaks up the PGE service territory, severing up to 32% of
the current PGE electric load from the company which would cause a possible cost
burden on the remaining customers outside of Multnomah County; and,
WHEREAS, a PUD would add uncertainty to an economy that is already strained
and further promotes the view that the Metro area is "anti-business" and sends the
wrong message to businesses considering the Willamette Valley area a place to locate
or expand, at a time when the Oregon economy is struggling; and,
WHEREAS, local governments face the prospect of losing millions of dollars
annually in property taxes and franchise fees paid by PGE and Pacific Power; and,
WHEREAS, the new utility will not have access to lower-price BPA preference
power in the foreseeable future and even when it does become available BPA rates
have increased 45 percent in the last two years and are due to increase another 15
percent this year; and,
WHEREAS, a start-up government utility would almost certainly begin operations
with no power generation and would be dependent on the volatile wholesale market for
nearly all power supply. It would sever Multnomah county from the integrated
generating, transmission and distribution systems of PGE and Pacific Power; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hillsboro City Council opposes
the formation of the PUD and the subsequent condemnation and forced government
takeover of the Portland General Electric's distribution system assets in Multnomah
County.
Bill Monahan - Budget Committee and Library Board interviews _ Page 1
From:
Susan Koepping
To:
Bill Monahan
Date:
5/2/03 10:53AM
Subject:
Budget Committee and Library Board interviews
We have closed the period for accepting applications for the above committees. The existing terms end
June 30. 1 need to know when we should begin scheduling interviews of applicants.
I know the Mayor and Council members are involved in budget meetings right now and the Mayor may still
not be feeling 100% .
1. We can hold interviews as late as the first week in June and still have time to include the recommended
appointments on a consent agenda in late June which allows us to have new or reappointed members in
place by July.
2. If the Mayor would prefer, perhaps Council President Dirksen and Councilor Moore could conduct the
interviews.
If you can give me a range of a couple of weeks when interviews can be scheduled, that would be helpful.
We have 10 applicants for Budget Committee and 4 for Library Board.
NOTE: On July 1, Councilor Dirksen replaces Councilor Moore as the Mayor's fellow interviewer on the
Mayor's Appointments Advisory Committee.
Thank you.
Susan
City Council
MAYOR
JIM GRIFFITH
109 15 SW Fairhaven Way
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 503-639-8629
Bus: 503-293-0805
iga0126@netzero.net
COUNCILORS
CRAIG DIRKSEN, Council President
9131 SW Hill Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 503-620-4829
Cell: 503-310-3659
dirksen.horne@verizon.net
BRIAN MOORE
9835 SW Kimberly Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Res: 503-620-6972
Bus: 503-570-4406
brian moore(c-pgn.com
SYDNEY SHERWOOD
10305 SW 87" Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 503-293-0902
Bus: 503-314-7723
sydnevsher(a)aol. corn
NICK WILSON
14565 SW Klipsan Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 503-524-6377
Bus: 503-224-5238
nick(@atlas-Ia.com
ORIGINAL APPT. DATE /
CURRENT TERM EXPIRES
01-01-03 / 12-31-06
09-12-00 / 03-13-01(Interim)
04-10-01 / 12-31-02 (Elected
to complete unexpired term)
1-1-03 / 12-31-06
01-01-01 / 12-31-04
O 1-30-96 / 12-31-04
01-01-03 / 12-31-06
01-01-03 / 12-31-06
COUNCIL MEETS: 3`~ Tuesday a&6 30 PM fory Workshop Agenda Business Agenda
STAFF LIAISON: CBill athy Wheatley, City Recorder
I:ADM1i3oard & Committee Roster,doc
Revised: 05112103
CITY COUNCIL TELEPHONE INFORMATION
Mayor Jim Griffith
Work Phone
503-718-1200
Spouse: Carolyn
Home Phone
503-639-8629
Fax Number
(Bus) 503-718-1300
Cell Phone
503-720-9582
Pager Number
(Personal) 503-788-9133
E-Mail
Bus a0126 netzero.net / ma or ci.ti ard.or.us
Brian Moore
Work Phone
503-570-4406
Spouse: Donna
Home Phone
503-620-6972
503-570-4420 / (Res) 503-603-0461
l
E
Fax Number
y
merg on
(Bus)
Cell Phone
503-849-7016
Pager Number
503-940-3970
E-Mail
Bus brian moore n.com / brianm ci.ti ard.or.us
Council President
Work Phone
Craig Dirksen
Home Phone
503-620-4829
Spouse: Jackie
Fax Number
(Res) 503-598-1191
Cell Phone
503-310-3659
Pager Number
E-Mail
Res dirksen.home verizon.net / crai d ci.ti ard.or.us
Councilor
Work Phone
503-314-7723
Sydney Sherwood
Home Phone
503-293-0902
Spouse:
Fax Number
Cell Phone
Pager Number
E-Mail
s dne sher aol.com / s dne ci.ti ard.or.us
Councilor
Work Phone
503-224-5238
Nick Wilson
Home Phone
503-524-6377
Spouse:
Fax Number
503-224-5239
Cell Phone
Pager Number
E-Mail
nick atlas-la.com / nick@ci.tigard.or.us
City Manager
Work Phone
503-639-4171, ext. 306
Bill Monahan
Home Phone
503-639-9702
Spouse: Linda
Fax Number
503-684-7297
Cell Phone
503-789-2502
Pager Number
503-920-2982
E-Mail
Res mo42or@aol.com / Bus bill ci.ti ard.or.us
Night Answer Phones
City Hall (Recording) 639-4171
Library (7:30 a.m. - 9:00 p.m.) 684-5886
Operations 639-1554
-street, storm, sewer, water emergencies
Police Department (7 a.m. -11 p.m.) 639-6168
Police Non-Emergency Dispatch 629-0111
IAADKCITY COUNCVCITY COUNCIL TELEPHONE INFORMATION.DOC
FAX Numbers
City Hall
684-7297
Niche
639-6795
Library
598-7515
Police
684-5654
Public Works
684-8840
AV= xec Staff. Adinin Staff
p ty Council, E
os113fO3
Tigard High Leadership
9000 SW Durham Road • Tigard • Oregon • 97224
(503) 431-5518 • FAX (503) 431-5410 • http://ths.ttsd.kl2.or.us/leadership/home.html
thsasbprez@hotmail.com
■ April 27th:
Rotary Banquet
May 151-3rd:
n of predominantly student written and student directed one
■ - a collectio
Festival of One Acts
act lays in the Deb Fennel Auditorium at 7:30pm each night.
■ May 5` -9`h:
Prom Spirit Week - different activities during the week that lead up to the big night
Teacher Appreciation Week - students give thanks to a years worth of direction in the
classroom through various events during the week
■ May 10`h:
Prom - Montgomery Park 8:00pm
■ May 14`h:
NHS Induction Ceremony - newly inducted members of NHS are presented to faculty and
parents in the Deb Fennel Auditorium at 7:00pm
■ May 19`h - 23`d:
THS Art Show - student work is displayed in the library for students, faculty, and community
members to appreciate
■ May 22"d:
Final Band Concert - Deb Fennel Auditorium 7:00pm
■ May 26`h:
No School - Memorial Day
■ May 27`h:
Advanced Theater Showcase - Deb Fennel Auditorium 7:30pm
■ May 28`h:
Elementary/Middle School Teachers Breakfast - seniors are given a chance to interact with
past teachers over breakfast at lam in the IMC
Final Choir Concert - Deb Fennel Auditorium 7:00pm
■ May 29`h:
Leadership Awards Night - Deb Fennel Auditorium 7:00pm
■ June 2nd:
Senior Awards Night - Deb Fennel Auditorium 7:30ptn
■ June 3`d:
Spring Sports Awards - Main Gym 7:00pm
■ June 4th:
Baccalaureate Night - Deb Fennel Auditorium 7:00pm
■ June 5h:
Theater I and 2 Showcase - Deb Fennel Auditorium 7:30pm
■ June 6h:
Graduation - Stadium 7:30pm
■ June 11th:
Last Day of School
"Celebrate the past, embrace the
present, dream the future. "
THS Leadership '02 - '03 Mission Statement
Bill Monahan - Budget Committee an Library Board interviews Page 1
From: Susan Koepping
To: Bill Monahan
Date: 5/2/03 10:53AM
Subject: Budget Committee and Library Board interviews
We have closed the period for accepting applications for the above committees. The existing terms end
June 30. 1 need to know when we should begin scheduling interviews of applicants.
I know the Mayor and Council members are involved in budget meetings right now and the Mayor may still
not be feeling 100% .
1. We can hold interviews as late as the first week in June and still have time to include the recommended
appointments on a consent agenda in late June which allows us to have new or reappointed members in
place by July.
2. If the Mayor would prefer, perhaps Council President Dirksen and Councilor Moore could conduct the
interviews.
If you can give me a range of a couple of weeks when interviews can be scheduled, that would be helpful.
We have 10 applicants for Budget Committee and 4 for Library Board.
NOTE: On July 1, Councilor Dirksen replaces Councilor Moore as the Mayor's fellow interviewer on the
Mayor's Appointments Advisory Committee.
Thank you.
Susan
City Council
MAYOR
JIM GRIFFITH
log 15 SW Fairhaven Way
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 503-639-8629
BUS: 503-293-0805
Aa0126Ca_netzero.net
COUNCILORS
CRAIG DIRKSEN, Council President
9131 SW Hill Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 503-620-4829
Cell: 503-310-3659
dirksen homeC~verizon.net
BRIAN MOORE
9835 SW Kimberly Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Res: 503-620-6972
Bus: 503-570-4406
brian n-ioore(q--)p9n. corn
SYDNEY SHERWOOD
10305 SW 87`h Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 503-293-0902
BUS: 503-314-7723
sydneysherP-aol corn
NICK WILSON
14565 SW Klipsan Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 503-524-6377
BUS: 503-224-5238
nickffatlas-la.com
ORIGINAL APPT. DATE /
CURRENT TERM EXPIRES
01-01-03 / 12-31-06
09-12-00 / 03-13-01(Interim)
04-10-01 / 12-31-02 (Elected
to complete unexpired term)
1-1-03 / 12-31-06
01-01-01 / 12-31-04
01-30-96 / 12-31-04
01-01-03 / 12-31-06
01-01-03 / 12-31-06 4 1h COUNCIL MEETS: Normally: 2"`a&6 30 Tuesdays at 7:30
Agefor nda siness Agenda
3r" Tuesday t PM for Workshop
STAFF LIAISON: CBill athy Wheatley, City Recorder
I:ADM\Board & Committee Roster.doc
Revised: 05112103
CITY COUNCIL TELEPHONE INFORMATION
Mayor Jim Griffith
Work Phone
503-718-1200
Spouse: Carolyn
Home Phone
503-639-8629
Fax Number
(Bus) 503-718-1300
Cell Phone
503-720-9582
Pager Number
(Personal) 503-788-9133
net / ma or ci.ti ard.or.us
0126 netzero
i
B
E-Mail
.
a
us
Brian Moore
Work Phone
503-570-4406
Spouse: Donna
Home Phone
503-620-6972
503-570-4420 / (Res) 503-603-0461
onl
r
E
Fax Number
y
g
me
(Bus)
Cell Phone
503-849-7016
Pager Number
E-Mail
503-940-3970
rian moore ncom / brianm ci.ti ard.or.us
Council President
Work Phone
Home Phone
0-4829
r
Craig Dirksen
Spouse: Jackie
Fax Number
03-598-1191
Cell Phone
0-3659
53
Pager Number
E-Mail
Res dirksen.home verizon.net / craiqd(@-ci.tigard.or.us
Councilor
Work Phone
503-314-7723
Sydney Sherwood
Home Phone
503-293-0902
Spouse:
Fax Number
Cell Phone
Pager Number
E-Mail
s dne Sher aol.com / s dne ci.ti ard.or.us
Councilor
Work Phone
503-224-5238
Nick Wilson
Home Phone
503-524-6377
Spouse:
Fax Number
503-224-5239
Cell Phone
Pager Number
E-Mail
nick atlas-la.com / nick ci.ti ard.or.us
City Manager Work Phone 503-639-4171, ext. 306
Bill Monahan Home Phone 503-639-9702
Spouse: Linda Fax Number 503-684-7297
Cell Phone 503-789-2502
Pager Number 503-920-2982
E-Mail Res mo42or@aol.com / Bus bill ci.ti ard.or.us
FAX Numbers
Night Answer Phones
639-4171 City Hall 684-7297
City Hall (Recording)
Library (7:30 a.m. - 9:00 p.m.) 684-5886 Niche 639-6795
598-7515
Operations 639-1554 Library
Police 684-5654
5654
-street, storm, sewer, water emergencies
639-6168 Public Works 684-
Police Department (7 a.m. -11 p.m.)
629.0111
Police Non-Emergency Dispatch
1AAMACITY COUNCIL\CITY COUNCIL TELEPHONE INFORMATION.DOC
NE INFORMATONAOC
pj~g lry coun al %CExec rrY Staff, Admin Staff
05/13103
AGENDA ITEM # n
FOR AGENDA F 5C ITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE SpAy Se/ssio - insurance -~~via V 1'Vl Vv...ava
PREPARED BY: Loreen Mil DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
This will be a short briefing for Council highlighting the City's insurance coverage for City Council and how
Council can operate to protect their right to coverage under the insurance policies.
STAFF RE 'ONPAFNDATION
Council will develop a basic understanding of the insurance coverage available how to preserve coverage under the
policies.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City purchases insurance to provide protection in case of a loss. While it is good to have insurance in place, it
is important to understand there are limits and exclusions in the insurance policies.
Information will be presented by Loreen Mills, Tigard's Risk Manager, noting those insurance policies that
specifically provide coverage for City Council and the limits and exclusions in those policies. Tim Ramis, Tigard's
City Attorney, will then advise Council about ways to protect their ability to preserve the coverage of those policies
while taking action and making decisions.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
N/A
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
N/A
ATTACHMENT LIST
N/A
FISCAL NOTES
In 2002-03, $564,198 was budgeted for citywide insurance casualty/property coverage (does not include any
employee benefits).
Agenda Item No. 2
Meeting of
PROCLAMATION
Emergency Medical Services Week
WHEREAS, emergency medical services are a vital public service; and
WHEREAS, the members hours emergency medical
week services tams are ready to provide life-saving a day, seven days a care to those in need 24
WHEREAS, access to quality",emergency care dramatically improves the survival and recover rate
of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and
WHEREAS, emergency medical services teams consist of emergency physicians, emergency
nurses, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters, educators, administrators and
others; and
WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams, engage in thousands of hours of
specialized training and continuing education to enhance their lifesaving skills; and
WHEREAS, Americans benefit daily from the knowledge and skills of these highly trained
individuals; and
designati g Emergency Medical Services Weelkhand is of emergency
providers by appropriate
W HEREArvic It
mical WHEREAS, injury prevention and appropriate use of the EMS system will help reduce national
health care costs.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT 1, )im Griffith, Mayor of the City of Tigard,
Oregon, do hereby proclaim the
Week of May 18 - 24, 2003
Emergency Medical Services Week
in Tigard, Oregon and encourage our citizens, businesses and organizations to observe this week
with appropriate programs, ceremonies and activities.
day of , 2003.
Dated this
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of
Tigard to be affixed.
Jim Griffith, Mayor
City of Tigard
Attest:
Recorder
a
AGENDA ITEM # 4' Z GL--
FOR AGENDA OF May 13,20)3
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Receive and File the Annual Solid Waste Financial R ort Findin s
DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK
PREPARED BY: Tom Imdieke
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Tigard Municipal Code requires that the City Manager prepare a report to the Council on the solid waste franchisee
financial reports and propose rate adjustments, if needed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
No rate adjustment is necessary at this time based on the review of the annual reports for calendar year 2002.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The annual solid waste financial reports have been submitted by the franchised solid waste haulers in the City of
Tigard for calendar year 2002. The two haulers that hold franchises in the City are Pride Disposal and Milllerr''ss
Sanitary (Waste Management). An aggregate report summarizing the data is attached to this summary.
aggregate rate of return for the haulers was calculated to be 8.68%. This rate falls within the acceptable range
established by the Council of 8% to 12%.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
No alternatives available, this report is required by the Tigard Municipal Code.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Does not apply.
ATTACHMENT LIST
Aggregate franchise hauler financial report and explanatory cover letter.
FISCAL NOTES
None
MEMORANDUM
ju-
J
TO: Bill Monahan, City Manager
FROM: Tom Imdieke, Financial Operations Manag
RE: Solid Waste Financial Annual Report for 2002
DATE: April 11, 2003
As required by Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 11.04.090, the two franchised solid waste
haulers in the City of Tigard service area have submitted their annual financial reports
for the year ending December 31, 2002. The TMC also requires the City Manager to
prepare a report to the Council on the franchisee reports and recommend any rate
adjustments that might be required based on the review and analysis of the reports.
I have reviewed the annual financial reports and prepared an aggregate report that is
attached. The aggregate rate of return for the haulers was calculated to be 8.68°/x. The
Council's policy on allowable rate of return provides for rate adjustments if the cy and
the aggregate profit rate of falls
below for he0caleor is over ndar year22002aa rate adjus moent would not be
calculated return o
required at this time.
I will also be preparing and submitting a Council agenda item for them to receive and
file this report for their business meeting on May 13, 2003.
cc: Craig Prosser
Michelle Wareing
City of Tigard
Franchised Solid Waste Haulers Financial Reports
For Year ended December 31, 2002
(Aggregate Report)
Direct
Calendar Labor
Year 2002 Hours Indirect Cost
Drop Boxes $1,137,094
Operating Revenue $1,825,494
Operating Costs 2,260,574 13,081 $350,157
Net Income ($435,080)
-23.83%
Can/Cart Services
Operating Revenue
Residential
$2,575,025
Multi-Family
0
Commercial
123,169
Operating Costs
1,430,009 9,099 $243,565
Net Income
$1,268,185
47.00%
Container Services
Operating Revenue
Residential
$23,175
Multi-Family
578,213
Commercial
2,370,374
Operating Costs
1,818,373 8,215 $219,902
Net Income
$1,153,389
38.81%
Reycling Services
Operating Revenue
Bin/Cart Recycling
$47,333
Container Recycling
99,610
Operating Costs
$1,081,935 8,135 $217,761
Net Income
(934,992)
Yard Debris
Operating Revenue
$7,133
Operating Costs
405,276 3,949 $105,708
Net Income
($398,143)
-5582%
Medical Waste
Operating Revenue
$1,601
Operating Costs
0 0 $0
Net Income
$1,601
100%
Consolidated Not Income
$654,960
Other Revenue
9,986
Other Costs
0
Grand Total Net Income
$664,946
Total Revenues
$7,661,113 42,479 $1,137,094
Profit Percentage
8.68%
AGENDA ITEM # 4,2- b
FOR AGENDA OF 5"- / 3 - 03
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: FY 2003 State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Grant
PREPARED BY: Ofc. Dennis J. Dirren DEPT HEAD OK 41?J CITY MGR OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
This is an information only presentation of the FY 2003 Domestic Preparedness Grant that has been compiled and
submitted to the State of Oregon to receive funding for HAZMAT/Weapons of Mass Destruction response
equipment.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
INFORMATION SUMMARY
This is the FY 2003 State Preparedness Grant that was sent out to agencies and received during the week of April
25a'. The deadline for the application was May 5 h and therefore a very short timeline was presented in order to
complete the grant. Fortunately, Randall Funding Inc. was able to assist with the preparation of the grant, however,
because of the shortened timeline, proper City of Tigard grant procedures were not able to be followed for pre-
authorization/approval from City Council.
Attached is the final copy of the completed grant application. This grant allows agencies to request funding for
proper HAZMAT and Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) response equipment so that officers will be able to
safely and properly respond to any such incident. Items requested by Tigard Police Department are included in the
Washington County Needs Assessment that has been compiled by the Oregon Office of Emergency Management.
The funding request is also consistent with a coordinated statewide needs assessment, and therefore multi-agency
response is possible.
Complete details regarding equipment requested and justification are included within the grant application.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
ATTACHMENT LIST
1. Grant Cover Sheet
2. Grant Program Narrative
FISCAL NOTES
Total federal funds requested = $43,244.13. There is no local match required for this grant. Detailed listing of
budgeted items to purchase is included in the attached Grant Narrative.
FY 2003
STATE DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS REEQUIPMENT GRANT
CO
Program Title:
FY 2003 Domestic Preparedness Equipment Grant
Grantee Agency:
Tigard Police Department
Collaborating Agencies:
None (Needs Assessment via Washington County)
Federal Funds Requested:
$43,244.13
Program Start Date:
July 1, 2003
Program End Date:
September 30, 2004
Program Agency:
Tigard Police Department
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard, OR 97223
(503) 639-6168
Program Director: Chief Bill Dickinson / ChiefBill@ci.tigard.or.us
(503) 718-2572 office / (503) 670-1561 fax
Program Contact: Officer Dennis Dirren / 28944(c~ci.tiard.or.us
(503) 718-2556 office / (503) 684-5654 fax
Fiscal Contact: Roger Dawes / Roaer(a~ci tiard.or.us
(503) 718-2493 office
Program Agency Federal 93-0503940
Tax Identification Number:
Authorized Official for the
Program Agency: Bill Monahan, City Manager CP%
Signature of
Authorized Official: ~~'~z ovl~
PROGRAM NARRATIVE
Part One: Coordination with Statewide Needs Assessment
Washington County's terrorism needs assessment was completed by a multi-agency, multi-
discipline team of public safety and public health personnel and was reviewed by the county's
Anti-Terrorism Advisory Committee and public safety agency heads. The team, or elements of
the team, met over the course of a year to identify the county's threats and vulnerabilities, assess
its public health preparedness, and determine its first responder equipment, training, exercise,
and technical assistance needs. The results of the team's efforts were submitted to the state
Office of Emergency Management for entry into the statewide needs assessment database.
Several members of the county team were also participants in development of the Portland
Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS) Plan and one member of the team represented
Regional HAZMAT Team number 9. Together, these members provided critical input into the
county's needs assessment process. More importantly, they ensured consistency between the
county's needs assessment and the weapons of mass destruction (WMD) equipment standards
and response protocols being adopted by the regional HAZMAT teams and the MMRS.
The original team members were joined by hospital, technical rescue, and public safety
communications representatives to complete the FY02-03 update of the needs assessment. The
team make-up was expanded to include participation from organizations and disciplines that
became eligible for grant funding under the federal FY02 or FY03 grant programs. Several of
the new team members provided critical linkages between the Washington County effort and
1
city of Tigard, Oregon
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
other regional and statewide initiatives. For example, several of the hospital representatives also
participated in the development of hospital equipment standards with the Portland Metropolitan
Hospital Emergency Management Committee and the technical rescue representatives also
chaired a task force working to create a statewide technical rescue capability. The teams' public
safety communications representatives were also involved in regional communications planning
efforts with the 9-1-1 centers in Multnomah, Clackamas, and Clark counties.
As a team, this group reviewed and updated the original needs assessment and developed
countywide standards for the newly eligible equipment. The process was expedited to ensure
completion of the needs assessment in time for local agencies to use it as a basis for seeking
funds under both the FY 02 and FY 03 grant programs.
Taken in total, the Washington County terrorism needs assessment reflects a coordinated and
integrated local and regional approach to WMD response. All public safety and public health
agencies as well as public and private hospitals must be involved and all must operate in new and
more challenging ways than has been expected in past emergency response operations. While
reflecting an integrated response, the needs assessment nonetheless identifies a number of gaps
in the ability of the county's first responders to perform specific WMD operations. These gaps
include:
• Personal protective equipment (PPE) for designated law enforcement, fire, public health,
public works, and hospital personnel;
• Communications equipment to enhance interoperability and support system and
individual needs;
2
City of Tigard, Oregon
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
• Chemical, biological, and radiological detection equipment for all agencies;
• Mass decontamination equipment for all agencies;
• Self decontamination supplies (i.e., auto injectors) for personnel exposed to certain
chemical agents;
• Search and rescue equipment and supplies for the county's fire service agencies;
• Bomb diagnostics and mitigation equipment for law enforcement agencies;
• Vehicles and trailers to store and transport WD equipment and supplies and to provide
suitable facilities for on-scene incident management;
• Medical supplies and pharmaceuticals for local hospitals;
• Security enhancement equipment for the county's critical facilities;
• Terrorism incident prevention equipment for the county's law enforcement agencies;
• Logistics support equipment to assist all eligible organizations with conduct of their
identified WMD responsibilities; and
• Reference materials to enhance first responder effectiveness.
The Washington County terrorism needs assessment outlines a countywide approach to closing
these gaps through the following actions:
• Provision of appropriate PPE to designated first responders and hospital personnel to deal
with likely chemical, biological, radiological, and explosive incidents within the county;
• Provision of individual radiological dosimeters to appropriate first responders and
hospital personnel and placement of dosimeter chargers at all of the county's first
response agencies and hospitals;
3
City of Tigard, Oregon
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
• Placement (pre-positioning) of mass and self decontamination equipment and supplies
and chemical, biological, and radiological detection equipment at fire agencies and
hospitals throughout the county;
• Expanding the reach, survivability, and capacity of the public safety communications
system;
• Enhancing the communications capabilities of the county's hospitals;
• Placement (pre-positioning) of search and rescue equipment and supplies at fire agencies
throughout the county;
• Placement of bomb diagnostics and mitigation tools at law enforcement agencies
throughout the county;
• Stockpiling of medical supplies and pharmaceuticals at county hospitals;
• Hardening of critical facility security systems;
• Ensuring the mobility of all stockpiled supplies for mutual aid response; and
• Improving the incident management skills and capabilities of the county's first response
and hospital personnel.
To meet one of the needs outlined in the county-wide needs assessment, the Tigard Police
Department is requesting funding to purchase personal protective equipment for all its police
officers.
rn
Part Two: Identification of E ni ment Needs
J
~ A. Briefly identify the equipment and/or supplies being requested and identify the specific
staff/position, function, or facility within your agency that will receive the equipment
and/or supplies.
4
City of Tigard, Oregon
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
The City of Tigard has 56 sworn officers, all of whom will receive the following personal
protective equipment:
Personal Protective Equipment - Level C
• MSA Advantage 1000 gas mask with standard cartridge
• Replacement filter cartridge for MSA advantage mask
• Tyvek chemical resistant coveralls with hood & boots
• Chemical resistant tape "Chem-Tape"
• Chemical protectant Butyl gloves
• Nitrile disposable gloves
• 3M N95 particulate respirator with valve
CBRNE Logistical Support Equipment
• HAZMAT heavy-duty nylon gear bag
The Tigard Police Department has 6 patrol supervisors (Sergeants) with 2 supervisory
vehicles which will include the following equipment:
• Dynavox Mega-phone (bull horn) with detachable microphone
• Bushnell weatherproof spotting scope (HAZMAT identification)
All 56 sworn personnel will receive the following equipment as well:
Detection Equipment
• M9 Chemical Detection Card for first responders
Explosive Devise Mitigation and Remediation
• Second Chance Level IIIA ballistic threat helmet with face shield
5
City of Tigard, Oregon
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
The personal protective equipment, ballistic helmets, and detection equipment will be
available to each officer, in the trunk of his or her patrol vehicle, to be used in case of
biological, chemical or similar WMD response.
B. Provide a brief justification for the equipment/supplies being requested.
The Tigard Police Department does not currently own the equipment being requested
under this grant. With the purchase of this equipment the department will greatly
increase officer's safety and protection and it will also increase the safe extraction of
victims during an incident. Currently, if a chemical or a biological emergency were to
present it-self, the department would not have the capacity to respond to such an
emergency without putting officers at risk. With the use of the above-mentioned
equipment, the department will be able to improve the chances of individuals' survival by
being able to quickly respond to life-threatening situations. All officers will be trained in
the use of the requested equipment.
C. Describe how the requested material will be available for use during a regional or
mutual aid response and how your agency will ensure purchased equipment will be
interoperable with those of other agencies.
With the exception of those materials that become a permanent part of a facility or non-
portable system or are specific to a particular individual, all of the equipment and
supplies requested in this grant will be made available for use during a local or regional
event. All of the materials included in the grant request were identified during the
countywide needs assessment process and much of the material was intended to be pre-
positioned around the county for local and regional use. Throughout the needs
assessment process, an integrated and interoperable approach was taken in the
City of Tigard, Oregon 6
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
consideration of all equipment categories. The needs assessment team not only ensured
compatibility within the county, but it also pursued compatibility with regional hospitals,
regional HAZMAT teams, regional public safety communication providers, statewide
technical rescue efforts, and the Metropolitan Medical Response System.
Part Three Identification of Current Capabilities
A. Equipment and supplies the agency has already acquired to respond to a CBRNE
incident.
The Tigard Police Department does not currently own any CBRNE incident equipment.
With the purchase of this equipment the department will greatly increase officers' safety
and protection and also increase the safe extraction of victims during an emergency.
B. Training agency personnel has received to respond to a CBRNE event.
Very limited WMD training has been available for the county's first response agencies
and hospitals. Some training has been provided by SBCCOM (formerly CBDCOM)
[fire, law enforcement, HAZMAT], Texas A&M [public works], DPSST [fire, law
enforcement, HAZMAT], and the state Office of Emergency Management [senior
officials], but only limited numbers of agency employees were invited or able to attend.
However, significant training on use of the incident command system in the field and in
emergency operations centers has been provided. Within the Tigard Police Department,
one sergeant has attended the WMD Law Enforcement Protective Measures training
course offered by the Center for Domestic Preparedness. The goal of the Tigard Police
Department is to have the remaining six sergeants attend this training course within this
year.
7
City of Tigard, Oregon
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
C. Any CBRNE exercises the agency has conducted or participated in.
Several of the county's public safety agencies and hospitals participated in exercises
hosted by the city of Portland. Those exercises included a full-scale exercise focused on
a chemical incident at the Expo Center, a tabletop exercise focused on a biological
incident at the Rose Garden, and a full-scale exercise focused on an explosion and
chemical incident at the Convention Center. Members of the county's Anti-Terrorism
Advisory Committee also conducted a small tabletop exercise that worked through
management of two possible biological scenarios. In addition, a large, multi-agency
tabletop exercise was conducted to discuss response to a school shooting incident and a
series of tabletop exercises for the county's fire, law enforcement, public works, and
public safety communications staffs were conducted to focus on use of the incident
command system. The Tigard Police Department participated in the tabletop exercise in
response to a school-shooting incident.
D. Incident or Unified Command System availability.
All of the county's first response agencies and hospital staffs are trained in the Incident
Command System (ICS) and the concept of unified command and use them when
responding to multi-agency incidents.
Part Four: Goals Obie lives and Performance Measures
Goal 1: To enhance police officers preparedness in responding to terrorist-related incidents and
threats.
Objective 1: Procure equipment and train all users on the appropriate use and
maintenance of the equipment.
8
City of Tigard, Oregon
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
Performance Measure: 100 percent of sworn officers receive the equipment provided
under the grant fund.
Goal 2: Assist fire and hospitals with mass decontamination efforts during biological or
chemical incidents.
Objective 2: Purchase necessary equipment and train all users on the appropriate use and
maintenance of the equipment.
Performance Measure: 100 percent of sworn officer receive the necessary equipment.
Part Five: Implementation and Evaluation Plan
The Tigard Police Department proposes to improve the ability of police officers response to acts
of terrorism. Under the management of Officer Dennis J. Dirren the program will accomplish
the following tasks:
Task
Year One
Month
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1. Inform the city of the
X
grant award and begin
detailed implementation
in
l
g.
ann
p
Purchase equipment
2
X
X
.
3. Provide Training on the
X
X
proper use of the equipment
on a continues basis)
4. Drill exercises (on a
X
X
continues basis)
X
X
X
X
4. Collect data for project
luation
eva
X
5. Analyze project data
X
6. Complete Evaluation
T
L
Report
X
6. Provide a copy of project
evaluation to (under
I
City of Tigard, Oregon 9
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
Management of the project evaluation process will be the responsibility of Officer Dennis J.
Dirren, training and accreditation coordinator. Success will be accomplished with step-by-step
measurement on the department's effectiveness in meeting the established goals.
Each officer will receive training on the appropriate use of the protective equipment. After the
training is completed drill exercises will be conducted to test officers effective use of the
equipment.
The evaluation process will track the achievement of milestones, within six months, and review
each step of the implementation plan with the project staff. The success of this project will be
measured through the evaluation of the following factors:
1. Was the equipment purchased within the time outlined?
2. Have all the officers received the appropriate training?
3. Was the training completed with-in the time established?
4. Have the drill exercises demonstrated that 100 percent of officers know how to properly
use the equipment?
The evaluation report will integrate the findings of the program and summarize the project
performance.
Part Six Identification of Available Funds and Equipment
A. Other federal grants or state or local funds currently earmarked for agency use to
purchase CBRNE equipment and/or supplies.
MMRS funds are being used by the city of Portland to purchase some communications
and personal protective equipment as well as some pharmaceutical supplies. Most of this
City of Tigard, Oregon 10
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
material is being distributed to and maintained by regional HAZMAT teams in the
Portland metropolitan area. The MMRS program is also purchasing two mass
decontamination trailers that will be pre-positioned for use in the region.
Grant funds from the CDC and HRSA are being made available to public health agencies
and hospitals. However, all funds thus far have been dedicated to planning or vaccination
activities. In the future, grants may become available for the purchase of WMD
equipment and training.
B. Equipment available that may be used to respond to acts of terrorism involving
CBRNE.
As previously mentioned the Tigard Police Department does not own any of the
equipment being requested under this grant. Additionally, the department does not
currently own any equipment that can be used to respond to acts of terrorism involving
CBRNE. Under a mutual aid agreement, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue is able to assist
the Police Department with only basic equipment such as protective gloves and with
decontamination procedures when necessary.
C. Other grant programs you are applying for to obtain CBRNE equipment, training,
exercises or technical assistance.
The Tigard Police Department intends to apply for FY02 State Domestic Preparedness
Equipment Program on June 13, 2003, to acquire the additional equipment the
department needs to be ready for any biological or chemical incident.
City of Tigard, Oregon 11
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
Part Seven: Budeet
Personal Protective Equipment - Level C
(60) MSA Advantage 1000 gas mask w/ standard cartridge $12,599.40
$209.99/ea
(60) Replacement filter cartridges for MSA Advantage mask $2,399.40
$39.99/ea
(75) Tyvek chemical resistant coveralls w/ hood & boots $344.97
$114.99/25 in case
(72) Chemical resistant tape "Chem-Tape" $59.40
$19.80/24 rolls
(60) Chemical protectant Butyl gloves $1,799.40
$29.99/pair
(100) Nitrile disposable gloves $26.82
$13.41 /box of 50
(60) 3M N95 particulate respirator w/ valve $83.94
$13.99/box of 10
CBRNE Logistical Support Equipment
(60) HAZMAT heavy-duty nylon gear bag (15.75H x 18.5W x 11.5D) $2,999.40
$49.99/ea
(2) Dynavox Mega-phone (bull horn) w/ detachable mic $354.60
$177.30/ea
(2) Bushnell weatherproof spotting scope (HAZMAT identification) $378.00
$189.00/ea
Detection Equipment
(60) M9 Chemical Detection Card for first responders $900.00
$15.00/ea
12
City of Tigard, Oregon
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
Explosive Device Mitigation and Remediation
(60) Second Chance Level IIIA ballistic threat helmet w/ face shield
$354.98/ea $21,298.80
TOTAL FUNDS REQUESTED: $43,244.13
The Tigard Police Department will be the recipient of the equipment that will be purchased with
the grant funds. Additionally, the Police Department is prepared to provide initial and on-going
training on the proper use of the equipment and to provide maintenance of the equipment.
City of Tigard, Oregon 13
State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program FY03
AGENDA ITEM #
FOR AGENDA OF 5/13/03
CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Transportation and Growth Management /TGM Grant Application Submittal
DEPT HEAD OK /_61 CITY MGR OK -
PREPARED BY: Barbara Shields
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Should Council approve a resolution endorsing the submittal of a Transportation and Growth Management
(TGM) Grant Application for preparing a Downtown Redevelopment I'lan'?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached resolution authorizing submittal of the application (Attachment 1).
INFORMATION SUMMARY
In November 2002, City Council established the Downtown Task Force and assigned it three objectives: 1)
work closely with Washington County and Tri-Met to influence the Commuter Rail station design; 2)
examine Downtown pedestrian and vehicular circulation improvements; and 3) develop a work plan to
address revitalization and economic development needs in Downtown. Witli the completion of the station
design document in March 2003, the Task Force is now ready to focus on the revitalization component.
At its April 15, 2003, meeting, the City Council reviewed the general revitalization strategy, which involves
preparation of a Downtown Revitalization/Redevelopment Plan. The revitalization plan will (1) develop
strategies for infill and redevelopment in the Downtown and (2) identify key infrastructure improvements as
Downtown revitalization catalysts. This phase would involve a possibility of a Transportation and Growth
Management (TGM) grant to prepare a revitalization plan.
The Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program is a partnership between two state agencies:
the Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Department of Land Conservation and Development
(DLCD). TGM provides funding for local government planning projects that lead to more livable,
economically vital, transportation-efficient, pedestrian-friendly communities. Funds reimburse local
governments for staff time and/or consultant work, plus other costs. For the 2003-2005 biennium, a local
cash match of 15 percent or more may be required. Match for TGM projects is currently provided by general
funds included in the DLCD budget. While the Governor's proposed budget includes match finding, final
decisions about the TGM budget, including possible changes to match requirements, will be made by the
2003 Oregon Legislature.
J
Project funding is awarded on a competitive basis in each of the five ODOT regions.
i
The TGM application will request funds to hire a consultant to develop an economic analysis, alternatives or
infill and redevelopment, and infrastructure programming.
I:\CDADM\JERREE\Agenda Sum\5-13-03 Downtown TGM agenda item aummary.doc
City staff will provide data ("Existing Conditions Report"), review products, and perform support logistics to
the consultant for workshops and advisory committee meetings. City staff will also take primary
responsibility for presenting the plan for adoption, with the consultant in a support role.
The application is due May 23, 2003. The week of July 25°i is the target date for announcing TGM awards.
Between August 2003 and January 2004, TGM and local staff will negotiate a detailed statement of work and
select consultants. If Tigard receives a TGM grant, Council will review the final scope of work and IGA
between the State and the City to hire consultants and fulfill the TGM grant obligations.
could be uptto $18,000e
The requested grant amount may be uP to $iiff)tim)c to tile projectc A onultantmatch. The
approximately $30,000- $ 45,00() worth of st
$20,000.
Communication/Public Outreach Plan and Process:
A detailed Communication/Public Outreach Plan will be developed as part of the final project scope of work
and program, if the grant is awarded.
Typically, any preparation of a coninnunication!public outreach plan involves two major steps:
1) Identification of stakeholders;
2) Development of public involvement process;
3) Anticipation of possible conflicts.
A general approach for a Tigard Downtown Itcdcvelopmcnt Plan is outlined in Attachment 2.
OTHER Ai-xr-RismavES CONSIDERED
Not applicable.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAI; AN?1'C rION COMPvIITTEE STRATEGY opportunities to work
Community Character and Quality of LifcDistrict lAsBusiness sociat Association businesses and property owners and
proactively with Tigard Central Business
citizens of Tigard to set the course for the future of the Central Business District.
Ai' TACI!MENT LIST
Attachment 1: Resolution of the Tigard City Council Supporting a Transportation and Growth
Management Grant Application for State Assistance in Preparing a Downtown
Revitalization Plan
Attachment 2: Tigard Downtown Redevelopment Plan: Communication and Public Outreach Plan
General Approach
FISCAL NOTES expe The requested grant amount may be u of staff tim 0e to to pay for a tl project A Slhardtmat hCcould becuptto $18 OOe
approximately $30,000 $ 45,000 worth
$20,000.
I:\LRPLN\Barbara\TGM\GRANT FINAL\ec 5-13 agenda item summary TGM.doc
Attachment 2
Tigard Downtown Redevelopment Plan:
Communication and Public Outreach Plan
General Approach
A detailed Communication/Public Outreach Plan will be developed as part of the final
project scope of work and program, if the grant is awarded.
Typically, any preparation of a communication/public outreach plan involves three major
steps:
1) Identification of stakeholders;
2) Development of public involvement process;
3) Anticipation of Possible Conflicts.
1. Identification of Stakeholders
Major stakeholders will be identified and involved from the beginning of the project
through committees, open houses and workshops, and, if necessary, one-on-one
meetings and focus group discussions. The Downtown Task Force, established by
Council last fall, will be the key platform for stakeholder identification.
Committees: A Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) and a Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) will be formed from the major stakeholder groups listed below.
Citizen Advisory Committee stakeholder groups:
• Property owners/business owners/residents of the project area;
• Neighborhood groups;
• Civic groups/Chamber of Commerce;
• Local elected officials (City, Washington County, TriMet).
Technical Advisory Committee stakeholders:
• City staff, including transportation, planning, and parks and recreation;
• TriMet staff;
• Washington County staff, including transportation and planning;
• ODOT staff, including Rails Division;
• Metro staff;
• Local utility providers.
2. Public Involvement Process
The public involvement process will include two early open houses intended to
introduce the project and solicit ideas about the planning and design concepts.
Two subsequent open houses will present the site specific concepts. It is
anticipated that the consultant will lead all four open houses.
As detailed above, major stakeholders will be invited to serve on project
committees. The CAC's ongoing role will be to review project information and to
provide guidance to the staff and City Council on products, project direction, and
I:\LRPLN\Barbara\TGM\GRANT FINAL\cc 5-13 Attachment 2 Public Outreach T D R P,doc
the draft plan. The TAC's role will be to provide early guidance and resolution of
technical, policy, and regulatory issues. The Citizens Advisory Committee and
Technical Advisory Committee will meet regularly throughout the project. We
anticipate that the consultant will be required to attend up to six CAC and six
TAC meetings. Where feasible, CAC and TAC meetings may be consolidated on
the same day as other meetings or public events.
In addition to leading the major public events, we anticipate that the consultant
will facilitate up to six one-on-one meetings with stakeholders or focus group
discussions. Additionally, City staff will brief City Council at key points in the
project.
3. Anticipation of Possible Conflicts
There may be three main sources of conflicts:
• Function and Design of the State Highways: Disagreement on the role of the
State highways (Hwy 99W and Hall Blvd.) in this area versus local
connectivity (Ash Street extension, Burnham design, pedestrian crossings,
neighborhood connectivity); number of street connections and amount of
property access that should be permitted; and street and right-of-way design
issues.
• Property/Busiriess Owner Issues: Support by property and business owners
will be crucial. Conflicts may arise over their perception that the plan will or
will not provide maximum economic value to their properties and businesses
through its effects on such things as property access, changes in development
potential, and the location of future streets.
Environmental Issues: Potential impacts of the study area development on the
Fanno Creek environment.
The project's proposed approach is designed to address such conflicts. It includes
a variety of opportunities to encourage a thorough public and government agency
dialogue-from Citizen and Technical Advisory Committees to focus groups and
individual stakeholder meetings to larger public workshops.
I:\LRPLN\Barbara\TGM\GRANT FINAL\cc 5-13 Attachment 2 Public Outreach T D R Moe 2
AGENDA ITEM # 4 4 GL, .
FOR AGENDA OF May 13.2003
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award of Contract for the Construction of Embedded Crosswalk Lighting Svstem on
Bonita Road (at Milton Court) .s/
PREPARED BY: Vannie Ng_u DEPT HEAD OK: Agustin P. Duenas CITY MGR OK: Bill Monahan
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Shall the Local Contract Review Board approve the contract award for the construction of Embedded Crosswalk
Lighting System on Bonita Road (at Milton Court)?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, approve the contract award to North Star
Electrical Contractors in the amount of $55,299.00.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
In FY 1999-2000, the Capital Improvement Program proposed a pilot program to install embedded crosswalk
lighting systems at several locations in the City. Since then, four crosswalk lighting systems have been installed
at Walnut Street (at Grant Avenue), 1215` Avenue (at Katherine/Lynn Street), 12151 Avenue (at Springwood
Drive) and Main Street (at existing bridge). Installation of crosswalk lighting systems at these locations has
proved effective in protecting pedestrians from oncoming two-way traffic while crossing at the intersections.
This year's program includes installation of crosswalk lights at the Bonita Road/Milton Court intersection. This
installation needs to be performed in conjunction with the development of Bonita Park located northwesterly of
the intersection. The crosswalk lights should enhance safe crossing of Bonita Road at that intersection for those
that wish to use the park.
The project was first advertised for bids on August 26, 2002. However, bids submitted at the bid opening were
considerably high. In the Council meeting of September 24, 2002, the Local Contract Review Board rejected
all bid proposals. This project was re-bid for the second time on April 8, 2003. The bid opening was
conducted on April 22, 2003 and the bid results are:
North Star Electrical
Tualatin, OR
$55,299.00
EC Company
Albany, OR
$57,155.00
Tice Electric Company
Portland, OR
$61,226.00
CivilWorks NW
Tualatin, OR
$66,326.00
Engineer's Estimate
$59,200
Contra-00 s to be reasonable. Staff
Based on the bids submitted, the lowest responsive Star of $55,299
recommends approval of the contract award to North
OTHER AI,TERNATNES CONSIDERED
N/A
N/A
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
ATTACHMENT LIST
Project location map
FISCAL NOTES n the FY
03
02-
under This project is funded from the State Gas Tax fund f $140of $25,000
in the1Park SDC 20or the Bonita Park
Embedded Crosswalk Lights supplemented by the amount
project. These amounts are sufficient to award the contract of $55,299.00 to North Star Electrical Contractors.
I,%"%2002-2003 N C pNboNta rd embedded x-walk~agenda summary for crosswalk lighting on bonita rd - 2nd bid.doc
O
R
O
i I
z
O
r
z
V t...
zm
ao
Og_0
cm J z
Q Y O
J
0 r:
m CO)
~
cr.
0
LU
m
W
I
I
I
I ~ -
O I 3AV HL 9L
ti
m
I
1 I
- - 3A V HI 6Z
-NNVY
-3AING )133210 OF~,-
I Q
1
r
Agenda Item No.
Meeting of 5,
1 ,~oL
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 14th day of May,
2002, by and between the CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ("CITY") and WILLIAM A.
MONAHAN ("EMPLOYEE")
RECITALS
A. EMPLOYEE has been employed as the City Manager of CITY since November
15, 1994, and had previously worked for the City in other capacities from August
2, 1982 to January 31, 1988 and from August 1, 1994 to November 14, 1994.
B. The current written employment agreement between CITY and EMPLOYEE will
expire soon and CITY and EMPLOYEE desire a written agreement setting forth
the terms by which EMPLOYEE will continue to serve as City Manager.
C. The written employment agreement is intended to create a professional and
business-like relationship serving as a basis for effective communication and as a
means for avoiding misunderstanding.
D. By not having to worry about personal finances or family security, the
EMPLOYEE can effectively concentrate on the CITY'S business;
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement and
for the consideration specified in this Agreement, the CITY and EMPLOYEE mutually agree:
SECTION 1 - EMPLOYMENT, DUTIES AND AUTHORITY:
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGEI
A. EMPLOYEE shall continue to serve the CITY as City Manager under the terms
specified in this Agreement. EMPLOYEE'S prior service as specified in Recital A shall be
recognized in CITY records to establish EMPLOYEE'S years of service for length of service
only.
B. The authority of EMPLOYEE, consistent with State law, City Charter or
ordinance, shall include, but not be limited to the following:
(1) The overall management, administration, and direction of City operations;
(2) The hiring, disciplining, and firing of all City employees, except
Municipal Judge and City Attorney;
(3) The negotiation, execution and administration of City contracts within
budget appropriations pursuant to City policy and ordinance; and
(4) Policy advice to elected officials, and open communication with the
community so as to foster responsive and courteous public service.
oiC
}a
J
t7
W
J
Any reduction or revocation of either the duties or authority, except by mutual written agreement
to the contrary, shall constitute a breach of this Agreement. In the event of such a breach,
EMPLOYEE may provide written notice requesting compliance with the Agreement as provided
in Section 3.D.
C. The Mayor and Council of the CITY agree to the principle of non-interference in
the administration as necessary to the orderly and efficient implementation of Council Policy.
The Mayor and Council agree to direct their concerns and communications to the administration
through the City Manager. EMPLOYEE agrees to respond promptly to all inquiries from the
council whether made individually or collectively.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGE2
SECTION 2;.- TERM:
The term of this Agreement begins on May 16, 2002. This Agreement shall continue in effect
until May 15, 2006 unless terminated as provided for in Section 3.
A. Nothing in the Agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the right
of the City Council to terminate the services of Employee at any time, subject only to the
provisions set forth in this Agreement.
B. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right
of the EMPLOYEE to resign at any time from his position with the CITY, subject only to the
provisions set forth in this Agreement.
C. EMPLOYEE agrees to remain in the exclusive employ of the CITY during the
term of this Agreement, and agrees neither to accept employment, nor to become employed by
any other employer until said contract termination date, unless said termination is effected as
hereinafter provided. The term "employed" shall not be construed to include occasional teaching
or consulting on the EMPLOYEE'S time off, which shall be at the EMPLOYEE'S discretion
upon advisement to the Mayor.
SECTION 3- TERMINATION AND SEVERANCE:
A. Termination Without Cause. This Agreement may be terminated by either the
CITY or EMPLOYEE for any reason whatsoever upon the giving of sixty (60) days' Written
notice to the other party. In the event EMPLOYEE is involuntarily terminated without cause by
the City Council before expiration of the term of this Agreement and during such time as the
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGE3
EMPLOYEE is willing and able to perform the assigned duties, the CITY shall pay EMPLOYEE
on a monthly basis at the EMPLOYEE'S highest rate of base salary during his term of CITY
employment, for a six (6) month period following the termination date. The CITY's obligation
to pay EMPLOYEE severance pay shall cease if and when EMPLOYEE accepts employment
with another City, or another employer, including self-employment, provided, however that
CITY shall pay a pro-rated share of the monthly severance pay until the date EMPLOYEE
accepts other employment, including self-employment. The EMPLOYEE has an affirmative
obligation to notify the City upon acceptance of employment.
B. Termination For Cause. This Agreement may be terminated immediately for
cause in the sole discretion of the City upon the occurrence of any of the following events:
(1) EMPLOYEE willfully and continuously fails or refuses to comply with
the policies, standards, and regulations of the CITY as are, from time to time, established;
(2) EMPLOYEE commits an act of fraud, dishonesty, misappropriation of
funds, embezzlement, or other misconduct in the rendering of services on behalf of the
CITY;
(3) EMPLOYEE fails or refuses to perform faithfully or diligently any of the
provisions of this Agreement;
(4) EMPLOYEE is unfit for the position per Federal, State and City rules and
regulations applicable to all employees in a For-Cause Termination.
If EMPLOYEE is terminated for cause or convicted of any illegal act involving personal
gain to him, CITY shall not pay any severance pay to EMPLOYEE.
C. Acts Constituting_Involuntary
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGE4
other financial benefits of EMPLOYEE in a greater percentage than an applicable across-the-
board reduction for all management employees of the City, or if the CITY refuses to comply
with the terms of this Agreement following written notice requesting compliance, or if
EMPLOYEE resigns following suggestion at a public meeting, whether formal or informal, by a
majority of the City Council that he resign, then EMPLOYEE may, at his option, deem the
Agreement to be involuntarily terminated without cause at the date of such reduction or refusal
to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, and the severance pay provision under
Paragraph A of this section apply.
D. Accrued Vacation on Termination. Termination or resignation in good standing
shall entitle EMPLOYEE to a lump sum payment equivalent to all accrued vacation and other
entitlement benefits, except that in no event will these benefits exceed similar benefits accorded
other management employees.
E. Notice of Resi ation. If EMPLOYEE voluntarily resigns his position with the
CITY before expiration of this Agreement, EMPLOYEE shall give the CITY at least sixty (60)
days' written notice, excluding use of accrued vacation, and EMPLOYEE shall be present to
serve during the 60 day period. After the EMPLOYEE has given notice, the CITY and
EMPLOYEE may agree to a termination date other than that set forth in the notice of
resignation.
SECTION 4- SALARY, HOURS OF WORK, VACATION AND SICK LEAVE:
A. Salary. The CITY agrees to pay the EMPLOYEE for his services in an amount set
by the City Council, payable in the same installments and in the same manner as other
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGE5
management employees are paid. The City Council may conduct performance evaluations of
EMPLOYEE as often as the Council deems appropriate and as provided in Section 7 of this
Agreement. The City Council shall review EMPLOYEE annually during the month of April and
may provide an increase in salary based on merit based on that review. The City Council may
award a merit bonus, as it deems appropriate, with a cap of five (5) percent of EMPLOYEE'S
gross wage over the term of this Agreement. Effective May 15, 2002, EMPLOYEE shall be paid
$8,943 per month.
B. Cost-of-Living Adjustments: EMPLOYEE shall receive future cost-of-living
allowances in the same percentage and on the same effective date as other City management
employees.
C. Hours of Work: Because the EMPLOYEE will devote a great deal of time outside
normal office hours to the business of the CITY, and because flexibility in hours worked and
work schedule benefit both the CITY and EMPLOYEE, the EMPLOYEE has sole discretion as
to his work schedule and hours worked.
D. Vacation: The CITY grants the EMPLOYEE vacation benefits at the rate of
accrual for an employee with 21 years of service as of May 15, 2002. EMPLOYEE is subject to
the same accrual limits as other management employees, to be used as he deems appropriate.
E. Sick Leave: EMPLOYEE shall be entitled to continue to earn and accrue sick
leave benefits on the same terms as other management City employees and that such additional
sick leave shall be added to the sick leave accrued by EMPLOYEE as of the effective date of this
Agreement. EMPLOYEE shall not be eligible to receive any cash or retirement credit for unused
sick leave, even if a benefit allowing the cashing out of unused sick leave, the application of
ENIPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGE6
unused sick leave to retirement benefit, or for any other purpose (other than use of the benefit for
approved leave) is made available to other City management employees.
F. Management Leave: EMPLOYEE shall receive a total of five (5) days
management leave per fiscal year, to be taken consistent with city personnel policies as applied
to management employees. The management leave must be taken by June 30 of each fiscal year
and does not accrue into subsequent fiscal years.
G. Payroll Reporting: EMPLOYEE shall be on straight salary as per this section of
the Agreement and shall be paid automatically by the CITY as per this Agreement. Any
vacation or sick leave used shall be reported to the CITY in the same manner as for other CITY
employees.
SECTION 5- RETIREMENT, DISABILITY AND HEALTH INSURANCE:
A. Retirement: The CITY agrees to contribute into the CITY'S retirement program,
on EMPLOYEE'S behalf, an amount equal to that same percentage of salary contributed for the
CITY'S other management employees. EMPLOYEE and CITY agree that any future adjustment
to the retirement benefits of management personnel will apply equally to EMPLOYEE at the
same rate of adjustment, effective date, and adjustment to salary. EMPLOYEE is eligible for
City contribution to his ICMA deferred compensation account on the same terms provided to
other City management employees.
B. Health Insurance: The CITY agrees to provide a comprehensive annual physical
for EMPLOYEE. The CITY agrees to continue to provide coverage and make full premium
payment for EMPLOYEE and his dependants for comprehensive medical Blue Cross Plan II and
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGE7
dental plans equivalent to other programs provided other regular management employees.
C. Life Insurance: CITY will purchase a Life Insurance Policy, the cost of which
shall not exceed $1,000 per year, on EMPLOYEE'S behalf, for a beneficiary to be named by
EMPLOYEE. EMPLOYEE has the right to retain such policy at EMPLOYEE'S expense,
subsequent to tenure as a CITY employee. EMPLOYEE shall have the option of purchasing
Term or Universal Life Insurance. EMPLOYEE may either have the CITY pay the policy
provider directly or compensate EMPLOYEE for the cost of EMPLOYEE's purchasing the Life
Insurance Policy.
SECTION 6 - PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPENSES:
A. The CITY encourages the professional growth and development of the
EMPLOYEE and encourages participation as be deems appropriate in professional associations,
short courses, seminars and conferences including, but not limited to: the International City
Management Association and. the American Planning Association and their annual conferences,
and the League of Oregon Cities Conference. The CITY shall permit a reasonable amount of
time for EMPLOYEE to attend and the CITY shall pay for the direct costs necessary for travel,
subsistence and registration subject to reasonable availability of funds and as approved in the
annual budget.
B. The CITY shall provide $300 per month vehicle allowance to EMPLOYEE who
shall provide his own vehicle, insurance, operation, and maintenance. EMPLOYEE shall provide
for oil and gasoline within the Portland metro area. CITY shall reimburse for gasoline expenses
on City business outside the Portland Metro area.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGE 8
C. The CITY recognizes that certain expenses of a job-affiliated nature are incurred
by EMPLOYEE on behalf of the CITY and hereby agrees to reimburse or pay said general
expenses on a monthly reimbursement basis, and the CITY shall disburse such moneys per
receipts or personal affidavits. Any civic service club memberships taken out at CITY expense
shall be upon the approval of the Mayor.
SECTION 7 - ANNUAL GOAL-SETTING AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:
The Mayor and individual members of the Council shall be encouraged to periodically
identify any concerns to the EMPLOYEE by either informal discussions with the EMPLOYEE
or by more formal means during Council meetings. The Council shall meet with the
EMPLOYEE at least annually for the purpose of setting Council goals and priorities. The
Council and the EMPLOYEE shall meet at least annually to evaluate and assess the performance
of the EMPLOYEE in meeting or progressing towards the goals formally adopted by Council as
well as the exercise of authority granted in Section 1 of this Agreement. These annual
evaluations shall be in closed Executive Sessions and shall be conducted during the month of
April.
In the event the CITY determines that the performance of the EMPLOYEE is
unsatisfactory in any respect or needs significant improvement in any area, the CITY shall
describe these concerns in writing and in reasonable detail or with specific examples so as to be
objective and positive in nature. As provided in Section 4 of this Agreement, the EMPLOYEE'S
salary shall be reviewed at least annually after the performance evaluation.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGE9
SECTION 8 - GENERAL PROVISIONS:
A. Professional Liability: The CITY agrees to defend, hold harmless, and indemnify
the EMPLOYEE from any and all demands, claims, suits, actions, and legal proceedings brought
against EMPLOYEE in his individual capacity, or in his official capacity as agent and
EMPLOYEE of the CITY, as to any actions of EMPLOYEE within the scope of his
employment. The CITY agrees to pay premiums on appropriate insurance policies through the
CITY'S normal insurance program and through the Public Officials' Liability Insurance Program
of the International City Management Association.
B. Other Terms and Conditions of employment may be determined by the CITY
relating tolhe duties and performance of the EMPLOYEE, provided that such terms and
conditions are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the City Charter, or any
other law. EMPLOYEE shall receive benefits equal to those provided to other City Management
employees, except where specifically addressed in this Agreement. Nothing shall restrict the
ability of the CITY and EMPLOYEE to mutually, and in writing, amend or adjust the terms of
the Agreement. EMPLOYEE reserves the right to discuss the terms or termination of this
Agreement with the Council as a whole or in either closed Executive Session or open Regular
Session as State Law allows and as the EMPLOYEE deems appropriate.
C. Except as otherwise specifically provided by this Agreement, the EMPLOYEE
shall be entitled to receive the same salary, compensation, vacation, sick leave, and other benefits
.as accorded any other management City employee, including provisions governing accrual and
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGE 10
payment therefor on termination of employment. All provisions of the City Charter and other
City programs relating to employee benefits and working conditions as they now exist, or as
amended, shall also apply to the EMPLOYEE as to other unclassified employees, and are in
addition to any benefits to the EMPLOYEE specifically identified in this Agreement.
D. The EMPLOYEE is required to maintain residence in the City in accordance with
City Code requirements. Temporary relocation circumstances may be approved by the Mayor
and Council consent.
E. The text herein shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties and any
oral or other understandings are not binding upon the parties, unless specifically amended in
writing by mutual agreement. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the
heirs at law and executors of EMPLOYEE.
F. Severability: If any provision, or portion thereof, contained in this Agreement is
held to be unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or portion
thereof, shall be deemed severable and shall not be affected, and shall remain in full force and
effect.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGE I I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON has caused this
Agreement to be signed and executed and the EMPLOYEE has signed and executed this
Agreement, both in duplicate, on the date first written above.
William A. Monahan, City Employee
ayor - City f Ti
~l
a Ct'
t w
ATTEST: City Recorder "PRO A TO FORM
City Attorney
G:\muni\Tigard\monahan employment agreement rev 2002.wpd
1:WDM\BILL\MONAHAN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT REV 2002.DOC
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - WILLIAM MONAHAN
PAGE 12
AGENDA ITEM # b
FOR AGENDA OF May 13 2003
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award of Contract for Engineering Services - 550 Foot Reservoir #2 Design and
Construction Mana ement Services
CITY MGR OK
PREPARED BY: Dennis Koellermeier DEPT HEAD OK ~D
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Shall the Local Contract Review Board consider and award a contract to Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. (MSA)
to provide professional engineering services for the design and construction of the new 550 foot Reservoir #2,
commonly referred to as the Rider School Reservoir?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends authorizing staff to negotiate the final scope of work and contract and awarding this contract to
MSA for an amount currently estimated to be $268,355.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Staff published a "Request for Qualifications " in the Daily Journal of Commerce on January 10, 2003, requesting
Statements of Qualifications from engineering firms interested in providing professional engineering services
relating to water reservoir, pump station and transmission piping design and construction. That process qualified
eight firms to submit proposals for the reservoir design portion of the project, but only seven firms presented
proposals. The City created a proposal review team that included both in-house staff as well as the City Engineer
from the City of Wilsonville. Three firms were short-listed and asked to make formal presentations to the selection
committee. Those firms included:
C112M Hill $631,571
Lee Engineering Inc. $495,178
MSA $268,355
Staff has evaluated each proposal based on pre-determined criteria, and concluded that that proposal from MSA
presents the best combination of local experience, expertise, and approach for the price.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Reject all proposals
2. Award the contract to another proposer
3. Give staff further direction
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Building identified water capital improvements is identified as a specifically listed strategy in the 2002 progress
report of "Tigard Beyond Tomorrow".
ATTACHMENT LIST
Memo from Brian Rager, Project Manager
■ Phil Smith letter from MSA dated April 14, 2003
FISCAL NOTES
This group of projects currently budgeted for in the Water Fund and the Water CIP Fund. This group of
projects is currently estimated to cost approximately $9 million and will be financed via a water revenue bond
sale currently scheduled for the fall of 2003
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
DATE: April 15, 2003
TO: Dennis Koellermeier, Assistant Public Works Director
FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer
RE: 550 Foot Reservoir No. 2 Consultant
After further review of the proposals and discussion with references for both CH2M and MSA, I
recommend that the City award the contract to MSA.
The following are comments I received from several references:
Tahanni AI-Essa, Hillsboro Operations Manager: Indicated that they chose CH2M due to
their need to have a fully designed reservoir up front to handle questions that came from a
variety of players, including Intel. The City purchased some land from Intel.
Gene Thomas, Sherwood: Indicated that they were very happy with MSA on the Kruger
reservoir project and encountered no change orders related to the reservoir structure
during construction. It was his opinion that when the contractor is required to provide the
final design for the tank, the change order issue is resolved.
e Jadene Torrent Stensland, Newberg: Was involved in the consultant selection and noted
that both KCM and CH2M were in the final running. Newberg specified in their RFP that
they wanted a fully detailed design from the engineer. Their desire was to have "no
surprises" during construction. They were worried that if hatch or piping locations change
during construction, then the cost would be more (by going with the design/bid/build
approach). She then gave me some price information that I thought was interesting. The
Newberg RFP for their 4 MG reservoir called for a fully designed proposal. KCM still
proposed a design/bid/build approach at a cost of $436,664 (they did this because they felt
it would save Newberg money in the long run); they noted that to go to a fully designed
option would add $52,000 to their price, which would bring their total cost up to $488,664.
CH2M's fully designed price was $468,000.
Lee Weislogel, TVWD: Left me a message this morning and indicated they had nothing
negative to say about either MSA or CH2M. They have used both and were very happy
with both consultants.
I also received a letter, dated April 14, 2003, from Phil Smith of MSA. He responded to my
inquiry as to whether or not the design/bid/build approach could lead to more change orders
during construction. I found his letter to be very informative and basically confirmed what I was
told by Gene Thomas of Sherwood. They have not experienced any change orders during
construction that related to the design of the reservoir structure.
Mr. Smith's letter also helped me to understand the design/bid/build approach a little better. The
last paragraph on Page 2 indicates that MSA, in conjunction with the reservoir
supplier/manufacturer, prepares a full reservoir design package that is put out to bid. We still
wind up with a full design package at bid time. The contractors have to come back with a
reservoir supplier/manufacturer design submittal for MSA review. I would take this as the "shop
drawing review. Any change to the reservoir structure design in order to comply with our
detailed performance specification, would be solely bore by the contractor.
The CH2M price for the fully designed option is $631,571. The MSA price for the design/bid/build
option is $268,355. The difference between the two is $363,216. Based upon my understanding
of the two approaches, I simply do not see the fully designed approach being worth an additional
$363,216. This is further bolstered by the price information I received from Jadene Stensland for
the Newberg project.
Finally, MSA comes out on top for me with regard to overall points. Including the interview, their
final point total came to 112.4. CH2M's final point total was 102.7.
Based upon what I believe is a fair evaluation of all the proposals, I recommend the City move
toward awarding the design contract to MSA.
Please let me know if you have questions.
i:tengWan6public worksVeservoir no. 2\041503-engineer-recomm.doc
PAGE 2
Mwra}; Smith & Assoaates, Inc.
EngilleetslPlantlers
April 14, 2003
Mr. Brian Rager, P.E.
Engineering Manager
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
r
i.
APR 1 2003
C1 1 vJ I iUARD
121 S.W. Salmon, Suite 900 -a Portland, Oregon 91242920 y PHONE 5103-1151.9010 RY 51032251.9022
Re: 550 Foot Service Zone Reservoir No. 2, City of Tigard
Dear Brian:
This letter responds to our telephone discussion Friday regarding the hybrid
design/bid/build approach recommended for the procurement of your reservoir in our
proposal to you and the City dated March 31, 2003. We welcome your inquiry and are
pleased to provide you additional information on this "tried and true" approach to
reservoir structure procurement.
Your specific question is if such an approach might lead to more change orders as
opposed to a "full design" approach. You specifically requested that we provide to you
information on the original and final costs of prestressed concrete reservoirs which the
firm has designed recently using the hybrid method with specific attention given to any
changes related to the reservoir structure. We are pleased to do so.
A cost summary of the two most recently constructed prestressed concrete reservoirs
designed by the firm and procured through the hybrid design/bid/build process are as
follows:
3.0 MG Kruger Reservoir, City of Sherwood/Tualatin Valley Water District:
Original Contract Amount: $2,234,505.80
Final Contract Amount: $2,458,428.84
Total of All Change Orders: $223,923.04 (Note: The Owner has undertaken
through this construction contract extensive project-related off-site improvements
to the City's pump stations and wells. The value of change orders on the facilities
at the reservoir site is approximately $10,000 or approximately 0.4% of the
original contract amount.)
Construction Contractor: Ward-Henshaw Construction Co., Inc.
Reservoir System: DYK
Change Orders Related to Reservoir Structure Procurement Method: None
Project Complete
Mr. Brian Rager, P.E.
April 14, 2003
Page 2
3.5 MG Mentor Reservoir, City of Tigard
Original Contract Amount: $3,372,682.15
Final Contract Amount: $3,296,074.58
Total of All Change Orders: (-$76,607.57)
Construction Contractor: Ward-Henshaw Construction Co., Inc.
Reservoir System: DYK
Change Orders Related to Reservoir Structure Procurement Method: None
Project Complete
The following project is currently under construction. The reservoir structure was
procured utilizing the hybrid design/bid/build process.
1.0 MG Reservoir, City of Columbia City
Original Contract Amount: $1,252,515
Construction Contractor: Skaar Construction, Inc.
Reservoir System: DYK
Project Under Construction
I have personally been involved with reservoir procurement and construction since the
late 1970's and have successfully utilized the hybrid design/bid/build approach since that
time both while with another firm and with MSA since 1980. The very first prestressed
concrete reservoir with which I was personally involved was a 4.0 MG reservoir which I
designed for the City of Newberg in 1978. This structure was procured in precisely the
same manner as we are proposing for your reservoir. It was a very successful process 25
years ago and it still is today.
Your question suggests an implication that one would expect to have more opportunity
for change orders with the hybrid design/bid/build process versus the "full design"
approach. Through our experience in prestressed concrete reservoir design and
construction, we have found that the hybrid design/bid build approach may actually
reduce the likelihood for structure related change orders. As we discussed Friday, our
approach provides for a thorough and rigorous design phase consultation and design
process with the reservoir supplier/manufacturer to finalize all reservoir structural design
and specification issues prior to the bidding process. The full reservoir design as
prepared by the reservoir supplier/manufacturer and as reviewed and approved by MSA
is included in the project plans and specifications package. After bidding and award,
there is a required reservoir supplier/manufacturer design submittal which again is
reviewed by our firm. Any change in the reservoir structure design that may be needed is
the responsibility of the contractor and reservoir supplier/manufacturer, not the owner.
Our experience has been that this approach virtually eliminates change order issues
regarding the reservoir structure.
Mr. Brian Rager, P.E.
April 14, 2003
Page 3
MSA routinely utilizes the hybrid design/bid/build process very successfully on steel
reservoir structures also. Our Statement of Qualifications notes some of these projects
which have included all types and styles of steel reservoirs for clients which include the
City of Portland Water Bureau, the Cities of West Linn, Oregon City, Fairview, and
Gladstone and the Powell Valley Road Water District, Clackamas River Water, and the
South Fork Water Board.
Brian, we appreciate this opportunity to provide this information to you. We would be
happy to visit with you at your convenience if it would be helpful to you to further
explore our recommended approach in detail. Please don't hesitate to call me at any
time.
Sincerely,
MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Philip H. Smith, P.E.
President
PHS jld
J
AGENDA ITEM # 5-
FOR AGENDA OF May 13, 2003
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Update on the New Tigard Libr
PREPARED BY: Mar&aret Barnes DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Presentation by staff to update the City Council about the new library.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The purpose of this presentation is to communicate recent events and accomplishments related to the new Tigard
Public Library.
INFORMATION SUNIlvIARY
On May 21, 2002, Tigard voters passed a $13 million bond measure for the construction of a new library of
approximately 47,000 square feet. This amount will pay for land acquisition, the design, construction and
furnishing of the new library, parking and related street improvements. The site of the new library is a 14.7-acre
property located along Hall Boulevard near O'Mara Street.
Nearly a year after passage of the bond, the design is completed and construction is scheduled to begin in June.
The project remains on schedule and within budget. At this meeting, staff will present fmal designs and floor plans
as well as discuss other aspects of the project related to the site. Staff will also provide details about the
groundbreaking ceremony on Saturday, May 17 at 10 a.m. and an update on fundraising efforts.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Goal #3: Adequate facilities are available for efficient delivery of life-long leaming programs and services for all
ages.
ATTACHMENT LIST
1. Set of PowerPoint Slides
FISCAL NOTES
N/A
W
J i
I
What's New
on the
New Library?
`Bring your own shovell
Take a virtual tour of
new llbraryl '
• See where the Bricks for
Books will be laidl
i
1
a,
_J
W
J
`"77
r
For More Information on
Library Project...
Contact:
paulaC~ci tieard.or.us
503 684-6537, ext. 2508
or check out the
New Library web pages at:
www.d.tigard.orms
1
1
tt~
ust ME
2
AGENDA ITEM #
FOR AGENDA OF May 13, 2003
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Communi Assessment Program CAP Introduction and Overview
PREPARED BY: Liz Newton DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK f~~---
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
An introduction and presentation on the Community Assessment Program (CAP).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Information item. No action necessary, however, Council may want to provide direction.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Over the past few years, the city has made significant progress to connect with our citizens. The results have
been improved two way communication, a better understanding of how we deliver service and what services we
provide. One of the Council's goals for 2003 is to "Improve and expand communication with citizens,
particularly communicating successes and future concerns."
Building upon the improved connection with the public, and in light of the Council's goal to improve
communications, a new program called the Community Assessment Program (CAP) was initiated on a trial
basis in January. The program is aimed at validating that city employees and elected officials have a complete
understanding of the existing conditions within the city on a neighborhood by neighborhood basis, and at
ensuring that issues are addressed promptly, efficiently, and in an equitable manner.
Attached is a memo that outlines how the program works, the intended results, and a communication plan for the
remainder of the fiscal year.
Several by-products of the program are important. One is the collaborative effort of city teams made up of
representatives of several city departments. A second is an improved connection to the community. The third by-
product will be the delineation of where the city is responsible for action, where private citizens are responsible and
where together we can work to improve the ability to bring volunteer efforts together to address many issues.
In summary, the CAP is essentially community policing applied to the whole city by all departments.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
i
Suggest modifications to the program.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Community Character and Quality of Life Goal #1, Strategy #1 "Improve communication about all aspects of the
City's business."
ATTACHMENT LIST
1. Memo from Liz Newton with attachments: Map
Schedule
CAP Summary Report
Assessment Report
Assessment Report Summary
Report to the Community
2. Communication Plan
FISCAL NOTES
The walks are conducted during employees' regular work shifts on Wednesday afternoons. For purposes of
calculating the fiscal resources involved, an average salary $32.68 per hour is assumed. Generally, 7 employees
participate in the two hour walk each week.
7 employees x $32.68/hour x 2 hours = $457.52 per week
i.%adrn%z% ap agenda item summary for 5-13-03.doc
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM
RE:
DATE:
Honorable Mayor and City Council JJ
Liz Newton, Assistant to the City Manager V'CZ-1
Introduction to the Community Assessment Program (CAP)
April 30, 2003
Introduction:
Over the past few years, the city has made significant progress to connect with our
citizens. The results have been improved two way communication, a better
understanding of how we deliver service and what services we provide. One of the
Council's goals for 2003 is to Improve and expand communication with citizens,
particularly communicating successes and future concerns."
Building upon the improved connection with the public, and in light of the Council's
goals to improve communications, a new program called the Community Assessment
Program was initiated on a trial basis in January. The program is aimed at validating
that city employees and elected officials have a complete understanding of the existing
conditions within the city on a neighborhood by neighborhood basis, and at ensuring
that issues are addressed promptly, efficiently, and in an equitable manner.
Program:
The assessment program is intended to bring work groups of city employees, across
department lines, into each neighborhood in teams at least once a year so the
neighborhood is the focus of an information gathering and issue identification effort.
After the "light is shown" on the neighborhood through the collaborative team data
gathering effort, corrective actions are scheduled, assignments made for follow-up, and
an assessment report is developed first for departments and then to the neighborhoods.
In order to accomplish this task, the city was divided into 45 areas that generally
correspond to the police department patrol grids (map attached). A schedule was
developed so that each Wednesday afternoon, a team of employees covers a different
area of the city. For purposes of scheduling, the city was divided into 5 geographic
sections and then areas were randomly selected on a rotating basis. A copy of the
schedule is attached.
Prior to the walk each week, departments assemble any available data about the area,
and note any specific information to be collected or observations to be made on the
walk. The data is compiled into a summary report that is distributed to the walkers two
days before the walk (sample attached).
The team of walkers is comprised each week of usually one person from every
department. Each week there is a team leader who provides general instructions to the
group and emphasizes things to observe. Depending on the size and character of the
area, the group may split into two teams or several teams of two. If the area is steep or
there are large lots with little development and a lot of area to cover, the groups may
conduct part of the "walk" in a car. If the area consists of light density housing or
commercial development, the
walks generally take about two hours. teams cover
different parts of the area.
After the walk is completed, the team members submit their comments. An assessment
report and an assessment report summary are prepared. The assessment report ties
the comments made by the walkers to specific locations and assigns initial follow-up
responsibility to specific departments or individuals. This document is where
departments record and update follow-up actions taken. The assessment report t is
summary is prepared for the Exec the kind of follow-up 'actions need d aA sample of
observed in each each area and generally
those reports is attached.
Walks have been conducted in 10 areas of the city and staff has just completed an
evaluation of the program. Based on the comments of walkers and the Exec Staff,
some changes have been made primarily to the walker guidelines and due dates for
report information.
As the next step in the process, staff has developed a format for a report to the
community (copy attached). This report will be issued within 30 days of the walk, ideally
to a community connector, posted on the web, and summarized in the Cityscape. In
order to further expand communication on the program, staff also proposes to publicize
the CAP schedule and set-up an email account for citizens to submit comments,
suggestions or questions.
w
J
Intended Results
Several by-products of the program are important. One is the collaborative effort of city
teams made up of representatives of several city departments. Employees will gain a
better understanding of city a workforce rof 260 sarong can produce a problems and recognize
that together e#her as as a community by all being
eyes, ears and hands for the community.
aThis can be
A second by-product is an improved connection to the community.
rea to be
achieved with the identification of one or more persons in each
sileeon as the city's point he of contact,
been nreliable
umerous cca ons of ctizensresource
stopp ng n
Also, , wh wh
walkers to talk, ask questions, and raise concerns.
The third by-product of the program will be the identification and delineation of where
the city is responsible for action, where private citizens are responsible and where
together we can walk to improve the community.
Finally, we have the ability to bring volunteer efforts together to address many issues.
In summary, the CAP program is essentially community policing applied to the whole
city by all city departments. It is an effort to have city employees more aware of what is
happening in the community, more ownership in the results of our actions and
decisions, and prompter action to address issues. The public will benefit, the
community will continue to improve, and the citizens will better recognize and
acknowledge the quality of city service, the limitations we have and how as partners,
citizens and city employees can accomplish more.
I:%admUlz%cep memo to council 4.2303.doc
{
V
~3
0
00
u
u
u
ri)
a
Q
U
L
I 'g. o
O
M
o 'E
U r: ~i _ 7 t r i
-~IUJI CL
TT~
"IN
s~rr.~-✓=„~~ ~9MV • i "--J i J
~o iJ l k i~ ,J
I
005£ l
co
oosrF W
G)
rn ([S
H
rn~ss t ' ~ A
V
t2. FhCI
Fr rd
CAP area assignments by quarter (updated 1/30/03)
(After each quarter, we will confirm the next quarter assignments)
date packet
materials Walk area - Team comments due
due by 5:00 Wed leader for to Julia by
not afternoons walk 5:00 on: