Loading...
City Council Packet - 05/06/2002 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING May 6, 2002 t~yl" rzi n ~ . LI iC b5~a`~ri{Ri-^`~~~ii z'g`n F~~n r.YT..6•U.' S•nss '.r1n `i'v. y~&R-Ma CITY OF TIGAR® rxY kw a OREGON S 4r ~ ~ ~f ~ M l+ y~ h l S ~E F 3f~lg ~'4~'i`%1'y~ t~l++ii~~t141 v •E` ("'~S~. y71r? ~ A+1~'~ .r l ~HaY ~r: ,aw •}R~...V. 7'n~ ~,t{s' .r.^• c ~;~..,;r.'F~rkwt'~~9.fs PUBLIC NOTICE: Upon request, the City will endeavor to arrange for the following services: Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing Impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 309 (voice) or 503- 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA - May 6, 2002 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MAY 6, 2002 - 5:30 PM Tigard Water Building Lobby Conference Room 8777 SW Burnham Street Tigard, Oregon 1. Roll Call and Call to Order Mayor Griffith If. Discussion - Management Compensation and Benefits ® Staff Report: Administration Staff • Council Discussion Ill. Non-Agenda Items IV. Adjournment 1: W D MCAT FMC CA\020508. D OC COUNCIL AGENDA - May 6, 2002 page 2 Agenda Item No. Meeting of _57• :P 9, D a MINUTES TIGARD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MAY 6, 2002 - 5:30 PM 1. Roll Call and Call to Order • Mayor Griffith called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. • Council Members Present: Mayor Griffith, Councilors Dirksen, Moore, Patton, and Scheckla IL Discussion - Management Compensation and Benefits • Staff Report City Manager Monahan introduced this agenda item and reviewed the four items to be reviewed by Council regarding City of Tigard management staff. 1. Proposed cost of living allowance (COLA) adjustment for fiscal year 2002- 03. 2. Adjustment to Public Employee Retirement System (PERS) benefit proposed for police management personnel. 3. Proposed salary adjustments resulting from a compensation study completed for the City of Tigard management group. 4. Options for department head utilization of their life insurance benefit. Human Resources Director Zodrow reviewed the above-referenced items with the City Council. Detailed information on the proposals is contained in the meeting packet material, which is on file in the City Recorder's office. Finance Director Prosser advised that the proposed 3.5% COLA adjustment had been calculated in the proposed budget submitted to the Budget Committee. The additional expenses from the PERS adjustments and the management compensation study adjustments have not been incorporated in the proposed budget. • Council Discussion > Councilor Moore advised he has no problems with the COLA and PERS adjustments as proposed. He also said he supports the proposal for the department heads to choose how they want to utilize their life insurance benefit (as proposed in the City Manager's memorandum dated April 26, 2002, which Is on file in the City Recorder's office). With regard to the proposed adjustments to management compensation, he advised he was COUNCIL AGENDA - May 6, 2002 page 1 concerned with implementing the adjustments all at once and suggested the Increases be phased In over the next several years. > Councilor Patton said she agreed with Councilor Moore's comments. She said that due to the current economic climate, that this would not be a good time to Implement these increases. She suggested the Council review the matter again next budget year and concurred with Councilor Moore's idea of a phased-in approach. > Councilors Scheckla and Dirksen agreed with Councilors Moore's and Patton's comments. > Mayor Griffith also noted he agreed with the above Council member comments. He suggested that it might be a good idea to look at individual compensation amounts for those classifications that appear to be "way out in left field" when compared to the market information. He also noted that the economy is playing a role in his preference to defer addressing the management compensation proposed adjustments. > Councilor Dirksen suggested that it might be appropriate to consider an increase if an individual has demonstrated a high level of performance, which should be rewarded through a merit increase. City Manager Monahan advised that the Council's direction on the PERS and Department Head insurance option would be reflected In the budget figures that will be presented to the Budget Committee next week. (The Management COLA, as noted above by the Finance Director, has already been calculated in the proposed budget.) 111. Non-Agenda Items: None. IV. Adjournment: 6:26 p.m. Catherine Wheatley, City ecorder Attest: ayo , Bard ate: 72~G~f as I:%AD M\CATHY\CC M\020506. D OC COUNCIL AGENDA - May 6, 2002 page 2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION In the matter of the proposed STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss City of Tigard ) I, Ca T ►1.LI r1- WlU~J , being first duly swom, on oath, depose and say: That I notified the following persons by phone or personal contact of the Notice of Special Meeting for the Council Meeting of 2 , a copy of said written notice being hereto attached and by reference made apart he of on the knj_ day of y1 V , 49.E-&a- CONTACT METHOD: PHONE PERSONAL DATE TIME Tigard Times Reporter at 684-0360 Name: Oregonian Reporter at 297-8861 or 639-9867 Name: Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7M day of 2Q,OZ OFFICIAL SEAL GREER A GAST'ON Notary Public for Oregon r.k)TARY PUBUC-OREGDk COMMISSION N11527=1 My Commission Expires: ID /D kiY C 'WISbtO1'4 E.. YPIRES OOT. it JIM 1Badmkathy%atmotdoc sa A 05/02/2002 08:50 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard ID 001 s****s*ss***s**s****s**s**ssss s*s MULTI TX/RX REPORT *as TX/RX NO 4688 PGS. 1 TX/RX INCOMPLETE TRANSACTION OK [ 0615035460724 TT Newsroom 1 0915039686061 Oregonian [ 1115039687397 Regal Courier ERROR INFORMATION RCITY OF TIGA® NOTICE OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please forward to: Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) Lee Douglas, Regal Courier, (Fax No. 503-968-7397) Emily Tsao, The Oregonian, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-965-6061) May b, 2002 - 5:30 p.m. Tigard Water Building Auditorium Lobby Conference Room 8777 SW Burnham Load Tigard, Oregon 97723 Notice Is hereby given that the Tigard City Council will hold a Special City Council Meeting on Monday, May 6, 2002, 2002, at 5:30 p.m., at the Tigard Water Building Auditorium, 8777 SW Burnham Street, Tigard, Oregon, 97223. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss compensation and benefits for the management group. For further information, please contact City Recorder Cathy Wheatley by calling 503-639.4171 or at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, 97223. rr° CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please forward to: Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) Lee Douglas, Regal Courier, (Fax No. 503-968-7397) Emily Tsao, The Oregonian, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-968-6061) May 6, 2002 - 5:30 p.m. Tigard Water Building Auditorium Lobby Conference Room 8777 SW Burnham Road Tigard, Oregon 97723 Notice is hereby given that the Tigard City Council will hold a Special City Council Meeting on Monday, May 6, 2002, 2002, at 5:30 p.m., at the Tigard Water Building Auditorium, 8777 SW Burnham Street, Tigard, Oregon, 97223. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss compensation and benefits for the management group. For further information, please contact City Recorder Cathy Wheatley by calling 503-639-4171 or at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, 97223. ~-2 JD 090 City Recorder Post: City Hall Lobby Date of Notice: May 2, 2002 MAMACATHYACCAWOTICE SPEC MTG 20020506.DOC JEN CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss City of Tigard ) 1, La_ P-ri- being first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places a copy of Notice of Special Meeting for the Council Meeting dated a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by refer ce made a part hereof on the d day of 20 0 L_. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7 day of Q 20 G Z 71-b 4Z"I Notary Public for Oregon My Commission expires: lD _ I - D 0 OFFICL& SEAL RAGAS M h:\login\caUiy\affpost.l NOTOOa~ X32.9 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT. 10, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please forward to: Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) Lee Douglas, Regal Courier, (Fax No. 503-968-7397) Emily Tsao, The Oregonian, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-968-6061) May 6, 2002 - 5:30 p.m. Tigard Water Building Auditorium Lobby Conference Room 8777 SW Burnham Road Tigard, Oregon 97723 Notice is hereby given that the Tigard City Council will hold a Special City Council Meeting on Monday, May 6, 2002, 2002, at 5:30 p.m., at the Tigard Water Building Auditorium, 8777 SW Burnham Street, Tigard, Oregon, 97223. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss compensation and benefits for the management group. For further information, please contact City Recorder Cathy Wheatley by calling 503-639-4171 or at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, 97223. (j&e~~kt JA) City Recorder Post: City Hail Lobby Date of Notice: May 2, 2002 I:\ADM\CATHY\CCAWOTICE SPEC MTG 20020506.DOC MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Bill Monahan DATE: April 26, 2002 SUBJECT: Special Council Meeting of May 6, 2002 On Tuesday evening, Council agreed to hold a special meeting on May 6 to discuss the following: 1. Management cost of living 2. Police management PERS adjustment 3. Managements compensation 4. Department head life insurance and the option of long-term care Attached for your review are memos from Sandy Zodrow on the first three items, and from me on the fourth. Sandy and I will present the materials to you during the May 6 meeting. I believe the materials are very complete as we attempted to detail the past practices, the process used in our analysis, and the conclusions. Given that the economic climate is somewhat uncertain at this time, I recognize that these are difficult issues to address. My recommendation is that Council consider a COLA consistent with that given to represented City employees. Further, I recommend adoption of the complete management compensation package. By so doing, our compensation for management will be up to date, competitive, and as consistent as we can make it at this time. I then recommend that we update the analysis in a few years. also recommend that Police management receive the same PERS benefit as TPOA employees. While this continues to make the retirement contribution for Police management different from that of other City management personnel, that is unavoidable as long as we have two retirement plans. More important, in my view, is the fact that adoption of the management compensation package places Police management where they should be in terms of total compensation in the City management group. also recommend the changes to the established department head life insurance benefit. The addition of options as expressed in my memo make the benefit more equitable. If you have any questions regarding the material which you wish us to research and provide answers prior to or during the May 6 meeting, please let me know. aft lAkO ILLVAEWSWAYOR a C020OZOPECIAI CC MTG SOBAOC MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members c FROM: Bill Monahan DATE: April 26, 2002 SUBJECT: Department Head Life Insurance Background Presently, each of our six department heads and the City Manager have the option of the City funding additional term life insurance coverage. In the case of department heads, the coverage equals two times their annual salary. In the case of the City Manager, the employment contract provides for a City contribution of a fixed amount of $1,000 toward coverage. For a variety of reasons, only three of the six department heads accept the term life benefit. Reasons given for not accepting coverage include: 1) the tax consequences of accepting the coverage are too high; 2) the department head already has a universal life insurance policy or some other coverage that he or she is satisfied with; or 3) the department head would prefer some other benefit such as long-term care coverage. I would like to explore providing options to department heads rather than offer only term life insurance coverage as with the current program. This memo will discuss options for Council consideration. Options I propose that the individuals filling the seven positions of department head and City Manager have the ability to choose one or more options to utilize their life insurance benefit. I further propose that the life insurance benefit be expanded to include long-term care coverage. The options I suggest be established are- 1) Life Insurance Coverage The cost of coverage varies for each department head based on age, projected salary, and health status. I suggest that a fixed amount be set for the City's contribution. Based on information provided to me by Sherrie Burbank of Human Resources, the estimated cost of life insurance coverage for our six department heads, as of July 1, 2002, Department Head Life Insurance April 26, 2002 page 2 ranges from $91.37 to $719.43. The three department heads presently accepting City coverage range from a cost of $563 to $695, estimated to rise to $583 to $719 for the coming year. Again, these rates apply to the cost of life insurance at a value of twice the annual salary of the individual. I propose that Council allow each of the six department heads to receive City contributions toward life insurance coverage up to $750 annually. 2) Method of Payment of Life Insurance Coverage Presently, the City pays for department head life insurance coverage on behalf of the employee. A few years ago, I suggested to Council a different approach for my life insurance. Council agreed to pay me the lump sum of $1,000 which I apply to my term coverage. Utilizing this method of payment, my federal tax consequences are less than if the City paid directly for the coverage. I suggest that Council consider making this option available to department heads-reimbursement of up to $750 annually upon showing that the premium was paid directly by the department head. I should note that our present contract language states that the City will pay the cost of a term life insurance policy, however, it is possible that a department head would be denied coverage. Or, the cost could exceed $750. A fixed benefit cost could be an advantage to the City in limited cases, and be fair to all. 3) Type of Insurance Some department heads may prefer applying life insurance payment to universal life insurance rather than term. In fact, some of our department heads may have an existing universal life insurance policy that they began paying for prior to employment with Tigard. The department head may prefer to apply their Tigard life insurance benefit to their universal policy. i suggest that department heads have the option of applying their life insurance allocation to a universal life policy. The amount allowed would be determined by the "formula" described for term coverage in Item 1 above. 4) Long-term Care Coverage Long-term care coverage has appeal for some department heads instead of life insurance. Such care can be quite costly. The sooner an individual begins paying for this type of coverage, the lower the cost. Estimated long-term care costs for our department heads as of July 1, Department Head Life Insurance April 26, 2002 Page 3 2002, varies from a "low range" of $972--$1,401 to a high of $1,731 to $2,080. Obviously, the range is determined by the provider of the coverage based upon age, current health status, and the level of care sought. My recommendation is that the City provide a lump sum payment to a department head which is reimbursement for a portion of the long- term care secured by the department head. Presently, the City does not have an arrangement with a coverage provider. Human Resources recommends that if Council makes this coverage available to department heads, the department heads should be responsible for obtaining their own coverage. In that way, the coverage can be tailored to the individual's needs. 5) Choice of More Than One Option If Council chose to allow a fixed amount of payment, such as a flat amount of $750, 1 suggest that the individual department head be able to allocate the amount to more than one benefit. For instance, the department head could choose to contribute some of the benefit to long- term care insurance and some to their universal life coverage. I would be pleased to discuss this memo and the options contained herein with Council. Establishing options for department head benefits should assist us to have a more competitive salary and benefit package. I would like to make any change effective July 1 or when the individual department heads' insurance coverage periods reach their renewal dates. 1AAOMIBILLWEMOSWAYOR 6 C4=0011DEPT HEAD LIFE INSURANCEAOC April 25, 2002 TO: William A. Monahan, City Manager CITY OF TIG® FROM: Sandy Zodrow, Human Resources Direct r OREGON RE: Management/Supervisory/Confidential Employee Group There are three (3) salary and benefit issues related to the Management, Supervisory and Confidential Employee Group which need to be reviewed and decided upon by Council in the near future. As you know, this group of employees includes those non-union management job classifications covering approximately 80 employees including department directors, managers, supervisors, and some professional/confidential positions throughout the City departments. These issues include: a) A possible July 1, 2002 cost of living adjustment b) Payment of the 6% employee contribution for PERS retirement for Police management, a benefit recently extended to TPOA as part of their new labor contract, and c) Proposed salary adjustments resulting from a compensation study completed for the Management Group Cost of Living Adjustment Each year the labor contracts for OPEU and TPOA bargaining units call for a cost of living adjustment to be implemented on July 1. This year the two bargaining units will each receive a 3.5% increase based on a the same formula in each one of their contracts, which stipulates an increase based on the CPI -W, (Consumer Price Index) West, annual average. The CPI-W is commonly used by other organizations, and the annual average is a concept that the City's labor attorney, Ken Bemis, discussed with Council when it was first considered for use in the OPEU (Oregon Public Employees Union) collective bargaining agreement. A brief description of the annual average is attached for the Council's review, but basically it averages the CPI over a 12 month period, as opposed to selecting one month on which to base a cost of living adjustment. It has been the Council's practice for at least the last ten (10) years (please see attached history) to extend the same July 1 cost of living adjustment which is to be received by the OPEU membership to the Management Employee Group. If the Council wishes to extend a 3.5% cost of living adjustment to the Management Group effective July 1, 2002, the annual cost including all related payroll costs, would be approximately $188,325. Council is advised that 3.5% has already been factored into the FY'2002-2003 year budget in the event Council decides to proceed with a similar cola for management personnel. It is 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tlgard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 timely given the budget formulation for FY2002-2003 currently taking place that this matter be considered and decision made by the Council. 6% Employee PERS Contribution for Police Management As Council is aware, the City recently settled contract negotiations with the Tigard Police Officers Association (TPOA). Part of that settlement included the City assuming the payment of the 6% employee contribution effective January 1, 2002 to PERS (Public Employee Retirement System) in addition to its employer contribution currently at 6.67%*. Since 1995 TPOA employees and Police management personnel have paid the 6% contribution, however prior to that time the City paid the 6%. Most public sector employers, including all but one of the cities which Tigard uses as market comparables, pay the 6% employee portion.of the retirement. Both the TPOA membership, and the Tigard Police Department management, receive PERS as their retirement plan, however currently management personnel pay the 6% employee portion, not the City. The Police management positions include the Chief, Captains, Lieutenants, and Sergeants, or approximately 15 staff. Other City department management staff (non-Police) are covered under the ICMA retirement plan, not PERS. The current employer contribution for ICMA is 11 with no employee contribution. If the City assumes responsibility for the 6% employee contribution, total City contribution to Police management will be 13.02% (some compounding of employee portion due to PERS regulations). It should be noted that when the City first required employee payment of the 6% following Measure 8, employee pay rates in Police were increased by 6%. It is not proposed that Police management salaries be reduced by 6% now. Salaries and PERS contributions were taken into account when the Compensation Study in the following section of this memo was completed. The question before the Council is whether they wish to begin paying the 6% employee portion to PERS for the non-union Police management, just as is currently done for the TPOA group. This issue will be a factor for employees considering promotional opportunities within the department. As mentioned previously, this 6% employee contribution is also typically paid by other public sector law enforcement agencies, a matter which may impact outside recruitment efforts for the management ranks. If the Council decides to proceed with this change, the other element of this issue that needs to be addressed would be an effective date. Possible options may include a) an effective date identical to the TPOA contract settlement which * Employer rates subject to change every two years based on actuarial studies performed by the Public Employee Retirement System called for the 6% adjustment to be made on January 1, 2002 b) an effective date of July 1, 2002, given at the same time as the cost of living adjustment and/or compensation study salary adjustments (see below) currently being considered by Council for all City wide management positions, including Police management personnel. The estimated annual cost for the 6% assumption, should the Council decide to extend this benefit to the Police management personnel, is approximately $64,000 per year. Compensation Study A compensation review of the Management Group job classifications was recently completed, including a market review with the City's seven public sector labor market comparables (Cities of Gresham, Beaverton, Hillsboro, Lake Oswego, Oregon City, West Linn and Milwaukie). The salaries for positions in this group are currently set based on internal salary relationships, meaning the internal equity of pay between positions within the City organization, as well as some classifications which are set based on external market indicators, called "benchmark classifications". When the City completed a comprehensive City wide Job Classification and Compensation Review in 1995 the Council decided that it would attempt to pay wages where appropriate that reflected the "median" market position of selected public employers, as mentioned above. Most positions in this group have not had the salary range for their job classifications adjusted since the 1995 study, including department directors. In late 1999 a second compensation review was conducted for this group, however only about 25 positions out of 75 received adjustments due to internal or external comparability factors, mostly ranging from .6% to 5%. This recent study completed in early 2002 indicates that adjustments to the salary ranges for approximately 36 positions (22 job classifications) would be appropriate based on issues of internal salary relationship equity and/or market indicators. Since the 1999 study nearly half of those public sector employers used by the City of Tigard as comparables have completed compensation studies and made wage adjustments within their organizations for similar job classifications. A list of the proposed adjustments for the City of Tigard is attached for the Council's review and include increases ranging from .50% to 7.5%, with one information system position proposed at a 12.5% adjustment. The annual cost for these adjustments is approximately $103,960 including all related payroll costs. Discussion with Council regarding these above issues is scheduled for 5:30 p.m., May 6"'. Prior to that meeting date an updated pay plan incorporating the existing salary ranges/scales with the results of the proposed compensation study and a 3.5% cost of living adjustment will be prepared for the Council's information. Please let me know if you need any further information. Thank you for your consideration. ESTIMATED SALARY AND BENEFIT COSTS OF POTENTIAL COLA FOR MANAGEMENT GROUP Annual Payroll COLA FICA MEDIC. RETIRE. DEF.COM. TOTAL 4423128 154,809 3.50% 9,598 2,245 17,029 4,644 188,326 150,386 3.40% 9,324 2,181 16,542 4,512 182,945 145,963 3.30% 9,050 2,116 16,056 4,379 177,564 141,540 3.20% 8,775 2,052 15,569 4,246 172,184 137,117 3.10% 8,501 1,988 15,083 4,114 166,803 132,694 3.00% 8,227 1,924 14,596 3,981 161,422 128,271 2.90% 7,953 1,860 14,110 3,848 156,041 123,848 2.80% 7,679 1,796 13,623 3,715 150,661 119,424 2.70% 7,404 1,732 13,137 3,583 145,280 115,001 2.60% 7,130 1,668 12,650 3,450 139,899 110,578 2.50% 6,856 1,603 12,164 3,317 134,518 106,155 2.40% 6,582 1,539 11,677 3,185 129,138 101,732 2.30% 6,307 1,475 11,191 3,052 123,757 97,309 2.20% 6,033 1,411 10,704 2,919 118,376 92,886 2.10% 5,759 1,347 10,217 2,787 112,995 88,463 2.00% 5,485 1,283 9,731 2,654 107,615 84,039 1.90% 5,210 1,219 9,244 2,521 102,234 79,616 1.80% 4,936 1,154 8,758 2,388 96,853 75,193 1.70% 4,662 1,090 8,271 2,256 91,473 70,770 1.60% 4,388 1,026 7,785 2,123 86,092 66,347 1.50% 4,114 962 7,298 1,990 80,711 61,924 1.40% 3,839 898 6,812 1,858 75,330 57,501 1.30% 3,565 834 6,325 1,725 69,950 53,078 1.20% 3,291 770 5,839 1,592 64,569 48,654 1.10% 3,017 705 5,352 1,460 59,188 44,231 1.00% 2,742 641 4,865 1,327 53,807 COST OF LIVING INCREASES BY UNIT DATE MANAGEMENT/ OPEU TPOA PROFESSIONAL 7/1/01 3.5% 3.5%. 3.5% CPI-W West CPI-W West Annual avg Annual avg Non-sworn only 7/1/00 2.6% 2.6% 3% Flat CPI-W West 1.5% 1/01, Flat (Jan-Jan) 7/1/99 2.5% 2.5% 1.5% Flat CPI-W West (Jan-Jan) 7/1/98 2.75% 2.75% 3% CPI-W West CPI-W-All (Jan-Jan) Cities (Jan-Jan) 7/1/97 3% 3% Flat 3% CPI-W-All Cities (Jan-Jan) 0 711196 3% 3% 3° ° 7/1/95 3% 3% ° 7/1/94 3.3% 3.3% 5% 7/1/93 4.2% 4.2% 3.2% 7/1/92 3% 3% 3% NEIN Protected COLA's and CP' indexes for Tigard Comparable Agencies Junsdiction Group Index 1-Jul-02 City of Gresham Non-Reps No CPI recommend 3% Police No CPI 3% Teamsters No CPI 3% Fire No CPI 5% to top step employees only City of Mihvaukie Non-Reps' No CPI recommend 3% Police CPI-U, Portland, January in arbitration AFSCME No CPI 3%a City of Oregon Cfij Non-Reps No CPI recommend 3% Police CPI-W, April 3% limit per Council AFSCME CPI-W, April 3% limit per Council City of Beaverton Non-Reps CPI-W, January 02 2% Police unknown negotiating OPEU CPI-W, January 02 2% City of Hillsboro Non-reps CPI-W, All US, Jan-Jan not determined Police no COLA Fire CPI-W, All US, Jan-Jan not determined City of West Linn Non-reps No CPI not determined Police CPl-W, Portland min 4%, max 5.5% AFSCME CPI-W, Portland negotiating City of Tualatin' Non-reps No CPI usually same as OPEU Police CPl-W, West, Annual Ave. 3.50% OPEU 85% CPI-W, Portland, Jan-Jan .2.13% City of Lake Oswego Non-reps No CPI not determined (possible 2.5%) Police unknown negotiating Fire unknown negotiating City of Tigard Non-reps No CPI not determined Police CPl-W West (Annual avg.) 3.50% OPEU CPI -W West (Annual avg.) 3.50% City of Tualatin is not a standard comparable; for informational purposes only ' low CPI - W. West - Annual Ave~ee This formula is an average of 12 months. The premise for using the CPI - W (Annual Average) is that over time, it is typically a more fair average. The CPI - W reflects costs of urban wage earners and clerical workers for a selected basket of goods and services. It excludes temporary workers and the unemployed. The CPI - U is a broader index, measuring all consumer units, for a set basket of goods and services. Each month's figures in the annual average are determined by calculating the actual increase (or decrease) over that same month the previous year (i.e. January shows an increase/decrease from the previous January). Many organizations have "rolled the dice" by selecting a certain month, instead of an annual average, to use as their CPI formula. As an example, an agency might use CPI -W, West, January to January, which just measures the adjustment for that one month. Last year, the indexes were high until September. January 2001 4.2% February 4.2% March 3.7% April 3.8% May 4.2% June 4.4% July 3.7% August 3.3% September 3.2% October 3.0% November 2.8% December 2.3% If you average the above, it equals 3.5%. This more accurately indicates the increase in goods and services that employee are experiencing and what is actually going on in terms of costs. It is not a gamble. Averaging helps avoid both the high and the low "blips". 0 Survey Proposed Proposed TOTAL Established Current Diff. From Proposed Annual Annual ANWAL Class Int.Sal.Rels. Int.Sal.Rels. Median Increase Sal.Costs P/R Costs COSTS PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS Police Chief Range 112 Rg. 112 -13.38% 7.50% (1)6,631 1,176 7,807 CD Director Range 72 Rg. 72 -24.85% 7.50% (1) 6,284 1,382 7,666 PWD Director Range 72 Rg. 72 -6.55% 7.50% (1) 6,284 1,382 7,666 Library Director Range 70 Rg. 70 -7.55% 7.50% (1) 5,973 1,314 7,287 Finance Director Range 70 Rg. 70 -7.55% 7.50% (1) 5,973 1,314 7,287 City Engineer Range 70 Rg. 70 NA 7.50% (1) 5,973 1,314 7,287 HR Director 5% below 70 5% below 70 -4.97% 7.50% (1) 5,679 1,249 6,928 Network Director 5% below 70 5°x6 below 70 -3.17% 7.50% (1) 5,679 1,249 6,928 Asst. to City Mgr. 10% below 70 10% below 70 NA 7.50% (1) 5.400 1,188 6,588 Circulation Supervisor 20% + Sr. Lib. Asst. 15.56%+ Sr. Lib. Asst. NA 5.00% (2) 2,116 465 2,581 Police Records Sup. 20% + Sr. Rec. Spec. 12%+ Sr. Rec. Spec. NA 7.50% (1) 3,254 716 3,970 Assistant PW Direc. 10% below PW Director 10% below PW Dir. NA 7.50% (1) 5,679 1,249 6,928 Micro Computer 5% below Net Tech. -17.57% below Net Tech NA 12.50% (1) 5,156 1,134 6,290 Support Specialist Volunteer Coordinator 5% below Librarian 6.2% below Librarian NA 2.50% (2) 2,136 470 2,606 Lib. Tech. Svs. Coor. Same as Vol. Coord. same NA 2.50% (1) 1,068 235 1,303 Lib. Tech. Svs. Spec. 200x6 above Tech. Coord. same NA 2.50% (1) 1,296 285 1,5131 Project Engineer benchmark 1.00% below median -1.00% 2.50% (1) 1,476 325 1,801 Engineering Manager 15% above Project Engr. same NA 2.50% (2) 3,432 755 4,187 Captain 8.5% above Lt. 7% above Lieutenant NA 2.00% (2)2,688 477 3,165 Lieutenant 1506 above Sergeant 15.2% above Sgt. 0.13% 0.50% (4) 576 102 678 Sergeant 32.5% above Police Officer 32% above PO 2.70°x6 0.50% (8) 1,920 340 2,260 NR Assistant sama as Sr. Admin. Specialist 1 % below Sr. Admin. Spec. NA 2.50% (1) 956 210 1,166 TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS 103,960 Soma other c/ass/fications in the Management Group were market surveyed for informational purposes only, however not all classNlcations w,, np. The only benchmark classificatlons (meaning classifications set to market median) in this group are the Associate Planner; ,,,,ding Official and Project Engineer. Off OF'I'IGARD MANAGEMENT, $UPERVmRY AND CeNFII3ufmL GROUP LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY BENCHMARK CLASSIFICATIONS ASSOCIATE PLANNER 2002 AGENCY MATCHING CLASS TITLE RANK SALARY SALARY MINIMUM MAXIMUM CITY OF GRESHAM ASSOCIATE CITY PLANNER 3741 4775 CI'T'Y OF BEAVERTON ASSOCIATE PLANNER 3337 4472 CITY OF IIILI.4BORO URBAN PLANNER 3371 4302* CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO ASSOCIATE PLANNER 3293 4202 Cr" OF OREGON CITY ASSOCIATE PLANNER 3285 4190 CITY OF MILWAUKIE ASSOCIATE PLANNER 3259 4160 CITY OF WEST LINN ASSOCIATE PLANNER 2915 3786 * = SALARIES REDUCED BY 6% FOR PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION CITY OF TIGARD 3140 4208 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS BASED ON MONTHLY TOP STEP TIGARD RANKING: MEDIAN LOCATION: LABOR MARKET MEAN (AVE): 4270 -1.46% LABOR MARKET MEDIAN (MID): 4202 0.14% Crly OF'TIGARD MANAGEMENT, "ERVISORY AND CONFIDENTIAL GROIJN LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY BENCHMARK CLASSIFICATIONS BUILDING OFFICIAL 2002 AGENCY MATCHING CLASS TITLE DANK SALARY SALARY MINIMUM MAXIMUM CITY OF HILLSBORO BUILDING DIRECTOR 5593 7138 CITY OF BEAVERTON BUILDING OFFICIAL 4805 6439 CITY OF GRESHAM BUILDING OFFICIAL 4685 6090 CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO PERMIT CENTER MGRIBLDG. OFF. 4450 5409 CITY OF OREGON CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL 4226 5393 CITY OF MILWAUKIE BUILDING OFFICIAL 3962 5056 CITY OF WEST LINN BUILDING OFFICIAL 3662 4671 * = SALARIES REDUCED BY 6% FOR PERS EMPLOYEE COINTRIBUTION CITY OF TIGARD 4478 6000 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS BASED ON MONTHLY TOP STEP TIGARD RANKING: MEDIAN LOCATION: LABOR MARKET MEAN (AVE): 5742 4.30% LABOR MARKET MEDIAN (MID): 5409 9.85% CITY OETIGARIDMANAGENiENT, SUPERWORYAN DCONRDwiiALGROUP LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY BENCHMARK CLASSIFICATIONS PROJECT ENGINEER 2002 AGENCY MATCHING CLASS TITLE RANK SALARY SALARY MINIMUM MAXIMUM CITY OF GRESHAM SENIOR ENGINEER 4451 5786 CITY OF BEAVERTON PROJECT ENGINEER 4163 5580 CITY OF HILLSBORO PROJECT ENGINEER 3896 4974* CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 3860 4926 CITY OF OREGON CITY SENIOR ENGINEER 3807 4860 CITY OF MILWAUKIE CIVIL ENGINEER 3593 4586 CITY OF Wm LINN NO MATCH * = SALARIES REDUCED BY 6% FOR PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION CITY OF TIGARD 3657 4901 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS BASED ON MONTuLY TOP STEP TIGARD RANKING: MEDIAN LOCATION: LABOR MARKET MEAN (AVE): 5119 -4.44% LABOR MARKET MEDIAN (MID): 4950 -1.00% Human Resources Apd12002 INTERNAL SALARY RELATIONSHIPS FOR MANAGEMENT GROUP Classification Salary Relationship Police Chief Range 112 Captain 8.5% above Lieutenant Lieutenant 15% above Sergeant Sergeant 32.5% above Police Officer Police Records Supervisor 20% above Sr. Police Records Clerk. Library Director Range 70 Library Division Manager same as Admin. Services Manager Volunteer Coordinator 5% below Librarian Circulation Supervisor 20% above Senior Library Assistant Reader Services Specialist 20% below Library Division Manager Library Technical Services Specialist 20% above Tech. Services Coordinator Library Technicial Services Coordinator same as Volunteer Coordinator Human Resources Director 5% below Range 70 Senior Human Resources Analyst 10% above Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Analyst 5% above Associate Planner Human Resources Assistant same as Sr. Administrative Specialist Community Development Director Range 72 Building Official benchmark Inspection Supervisor 15% below Building Official Planning Manager 15% above Senior Planner Senior Planner 10% above Associate Planner Associate Planner benchmark Assistant Planner 15% below Associate Planner Finance Director Range 70 Financial Operations Manager same as Planning Manager Administrative Services Manager 7.5% below Financial Ops. Manager Sr. Budget/Financial Rptg. Analyst 10% above Budget/Fin. Rptg. Analyst Budget/Financial Reporting Analyst 22.5% above Sr. Acctng. Asst. Senior Accountant 12.5% below Fin. Opers. Mgr. Buyer 10% above Sr. Acctng. Asst. Public Works Director Range 72 Assistant Public Works Director 10% below Public Works Director Public Works Manager 15% above Streets Supervisor Parks and Facilities Division Manager same as Public Works Manager Wastewater Operations Supervisor 20% above Senior Utility Worker Water Operations Supervisor 20% above Senior Utility Worker Grounds Supervisor 20% above Senior Utility Worker Streets Supervisor 20% above Senior Utility Worker Fleet Services Coordinator 20% above Mechanic Facilities Services Coordinator same as Fleet Services Coordinator Program Assistant same as Assistant Planner Exec. Asst. to City Administration 5% above Conf. Exec. Assistant Confidential Executive Assistant 5% above Sr. Admin. Specialist Admin. Specialist i (City Admin.-) same as Admin. Specialist I Admin. Special II (City Admin.) same as Admin. Specialist 11 Network Systems Director 5% below Range 70 WEB Administrator 15% above Police Systems Specialist Police Systems Specialist 10% above Network Technician Micro Computer Specialist 5% below Network Technician City Engineer Range 70 Engineering Manager 15% above Project Engineer Project Engineer benchmark Assistant to the City Manager .10% below Range 70 City Recorder 25% above Exec. Asst. to City Admin. Senior Management Analyst/Risk 7.5% above Sr. HR Analyst , Risk Technician 20% below HR Analyst Ranges 70, 72, and 112 to be set in consideration of the following factors: 1) relevant labor market 2) size and complexity of operations 3) scope of responsibility and span of control 4) salary level of the City Manager 5) internal salary relationships to other relevant classifications. CITY ®1F "rIGARD, OREGON IO/I~NAG~I~IDE~~T']C/~~) ~ fl~X CONFMENTXAE GR®UP S A,LAnY SCREDULE 2001-02 Range Category Classification Title Pay Range r 32 M3 Confidential Administrative Spec I monthly 1,903 - 2,551 (City Administration) Hourly 10.98 - 14.72 Annually 22,836 30,612 38 M3 Confidential Administrative Spec 11 monthly 2,208 - 2,958 (City Administration) Hourly 12.74 - 17.07 Annually 26,496 35,496 41 M3 Human Resources Assistant Monthly 2,377 - 3,186 Hourly 13.71 - 18.38 Annually 28,524 38,232 44 M3 Volunteer Coordinator Monthly 2,565 - 3,437 M3 Library Technical Services Coordinator Hourly 14.80 - 19.83 M3 Micro Computer Support Tech Annually 30,780 - 41,244 M3 Confidential Executive Assistant 45 M3 Executive Assistant to City Administration Monthly 2,630 - 3,526 M2 Circulation Supervisor Hourly 15.17 - 20.34 M3 Risk Technician Annually 31,560 - 42,312 46 M3 Police Records Supervisor Monthly 2,699 - 3,616 M3 Assistant Planner Hourly 15.57 - 20.86 M3 Program Assistant Annually 32,388 - 43,392 47 M3 Buyer Monthly 2,769 - 3,710 Hourly 15.98 - 21.40 Annually 33,228 - 44,520 50 M2 Readers Services Specialist Monthly 2,984 - 4,000 Hourly 17.22 - 23.08 Annually 35,808 - 48,000 CITY OF TIIGARD, OREGON MAIVA CAE 17ALC SALARY SCHEDULE 2001-02 2OF4 Range Category Clawification Title Pay Range 51 M3 Budget & Financial Reporting Analyst Monthly 3,063 - 4,103 Hourly 17.67 - 23.67 Annually 36,756 - 49,236 52 M3 Associate Planner Monthly 3,140 - 4,208 M2 Technical Services Specialist Hourly 18.12 - 24.28 M3 Fleet & Facilities Coordinator Annually 37,680 - 50,496 53 M3 Human Resources Analyst Monthly 3,220 - 4,316 Hourly 18.58 - 24.90 Annually 38,640 - 51,792 54 M3 Wastewater Operations Supervisor Monthly 3,307 - 4,431 M3 Water Operations Supervisor Hourly 19.08 - 25.56 M3 Grounds Supervisor Annually 39,684 - 53,172 M3 Streets Supervisor M3 Police Systems Specialist 55 M2 City Recorder Monthly 3,387 - 4,542 M3 Senior Budget & Financial Reporting Analyst Hourly 19.54 - 26.20 Annually 40,644 - 54,504 56 M3 Senior Accountant Monthly 3,476 - 4,658 M3 Senior Planter Hourly 20.05 - 26.87 Annually 41,712 - 55,896 57 M2 Senior Human Resources Analyst Monthly 3,564 - 4,775 Hourly 20.56 - 27.55 Annually 42,768 - 57,300 58 M2 Project Engineer Monthly 3,657 - 4,901 M2 Administrative Services Manager Hourly 21.10 - 28.28 M2 Library Division Manager Annually 43,884 - 58,812 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MA14AGEMEN ISUPE WASORY CONFIDENTIAL GMIP SALARY SCHEDULE 2001-02 3oF7 Range Category Classification Title Pay Range 59 M2 Plans Examination Supervisor Monthly 3,749 - 5,024 Hourly 21.63 - 28.98 Annually 44,988 - 60,288 60 M2 Senior Management Analyst/Risk monthly 3,845 5,153 M2 Inspection Supervisor Hourly 22.18 - 29.73 M3 WEB Administrator Annually 46,140 - 61,836 61 M2 Planning Manager Monthly 3,943 - 5,285 M2 Financial Operations Manager Hourly 22.75 - 30.49 M2 Property Division Manager Annuul'ly 47,316 63,420 M2 Utility Division Manager M2 Parks & Facilities Division Manager 100 M3 Police Sergeant Monthly 4,058 - 5,438 Hourly 23.41 - 31.37 Annually 48,696 - 65,256 64 M2 Engineering Manager Monthly 4,256 - 5,704 Hourly 24.55 - 32.91 Annually 51,072 - 68,448 66 M2 Assistant to the City Manager Monthly 4,478 - 6,000 M2 Building Official Hourly 25.83 - 34.62 Annually 53,736 - 72,000 68 M2 Human Resources Director Monthly 4,709 - 6,310 M2 Network Services Director Hourly 27.17 - 36.40 Assistant Public Works Director Annually 56,508 - 75,720 105 M2 Police Lieutenant Monthly 4,673 - 6,265 Hourly 26.96 - '36.14 Annually 56,076 - 75,180 I Cm OF TYGAm OREcoN MAtw Fffcvn=YC ALGROJP SALARY SCMMUL r 2001-02 4oF4 Range Category . Classification Tide Pay Range 70 M1 Library Director Monthly 4,953 - 6,637 M1 Director of Finance Fdourly 28.58 - 38.29 M1 City Engineer Annually 59,436 - 79,644 108 M2 Police Captain Monthly 4,998 - 6,699 (dourly 28.83 - 38.65 Annually 59,976 - 80,388 72 Ml Public Works Director Monthly 51211 - 61982 M1 Conununity Development Director Hourly 30.06 - 40.28 Annually . 62,532 - 83,784 112 M1 Police Chief monthly 5,497 - 7,368 Hourly 31.71 - 42.51 Annually 65,964 - 88,416