City Council Packet - 03/19/2002
A f ~
Aar r~~i GM
r~~,~~it } r r
4 ~t
G.1t ~~r~ i~iry ft ~'~cFkit ~~'~<d~((,i k) 5Y t ,
N7 i'S,~t4rr.rt~~ri~ ` 1''~'~'u°6 g~;+' : lt~l,'
J f. tixl ~rC' ? ~ .
,i} r~int~'f 25~~nv` *,~{?ir~~y1~+~ LT' ,cF"'@"t ' v ~4N1 ~?3.^3,..
K~r';•~ ~'h ~t'ar~lt K1f.'''r Ewa qa,~. } w ~ kl' 3 .5
`q'g-ar' ~'^sr-e r}.c ap+Y• o f " i to 6^';. ' C
i ~Mj~~ r
t ~ ~i~~ KF~ tom' iW }°;,a ~It~r 7''« r~' 'd~~ l' ' t
ta'.. iro'ys'n'di rr,,, rt7~'r'H !TI'rw' 4 tT•rrim°il i"e i#y ~i • r:
v ' f:`3aYf F~ ~f~,iv. r~, t¢"Lr b~ ' +`s1r;;St~' rr .r
c• < t5'...rr~" t ^ 3,•' „'X' "~yy~ °'i 4. v •$F Syr y+ "if ' I+fL.~, ~~r}s`y~°'. .
•;4y~~Lv'`~~a.*~cYy~ t~P4 yjS 2f, •~i~u+d ,C, bJ. 1~'~+t 1 S.✓'F1p~.~+A'~~. 4 ut`~py~tgq"~R''.q~Nt y~ 4 ' v
y :P r 4r~-0G,A yp'. °1~ 'S* ~ L' . a1V6 ''V / atf~J-:i 'y~r~YrnaAr'Ty~'~• t( '7.,;} C tl`s
~kl't Y t t j h rrh E i f', r n.
r' ."a'.~, @ a rs t5,.0 t v }s f'f~ti '1 t s i v -
c.'} ~t '~'h rr trr~, ,F~' dS 13 k~~~~`Y~T°~~.~'~: YF"~,,~t ~iny.r.?~~ ,g r ? ,
FP firr„2q°i,>-r y Mc `a~ rrYr.,{p~' ~r~~ , r~~ifiie. t'^j v 7+ \ J ~ . x ~
`f. tr~t i5•trf '34.er,.d j~.~ t"~`f fe t '-'Y^t3t~dnt''ef~~r'.'~ 4 e 3`
,r4yCeS !Y a•1T -'>S,*+',V'Kt;~f} k,✓"St 4 wrY 'Y f~'.xygr-e... i r•
)'t •3h'3 r'°~' a 'c,.3JJ" t'te }r °t,r}}r 7'A' ~~.4 j { q .
4X~x' ~l iZC . f'', w'a W'..1 y Y ° it+ 1'~ "f ' ,tvL~u /t,•ri c '"•`T c ,
rct ~°'Y~ 1y8}31rt r~'>>•} ; y !'i:,~ f. }a•L~^'xc q t f a •Y,
r 1 2~r r i? ~,K ,y'7 xl~,b Jx t~T e r'~3-~r~7;.~ ;~,~.,1~~. y 4. ' t~ .
~y y.~ 7 ~~~,,,~~~•••b sf`yq•a FFj'Tr~ r}lh' ! ~ .~')~~'C ~ 7fr .rr~'v2~' -4 1. ~ y rs,'r'1 y^ ~•v t.F . tfY } .
r4K. y ,3+- i + ?Y Y e t'ttr<t I'~4r ~2 nr4 y f';,"n~ 1? v U~~~ ~~r „ " ~
jYS : I aTj f 'i {+t' ~7 Y!'rt 4~W.i` 'tSi 7 '4 tft e44 1~ r,',. . y y 71~jr.
trtr rn, t i~ +4 n > 3 ~i
✓~n•~~;~'~o+~tr+; . r~ai,{ryS~?r1~yh •r ~,a•W'~a^Y{r Xr r is il" r~y„i'.. ~.~s ° '"4 'r ,alf.
SKr~nurrJ y~ :~X''~t. 1,:iTr 1 r"~~ 't ~"t~'d+}1~+i~Al` j~ t i~~~- Y ~~''i f~
z ~:.~`~,C „ f ~ w j, Ar ~I 7 t~ r ~r~ ^'~'fy!CtY 'ro s ' xrr- A'!~i ..f Kk1't t - ~ v u
~+tf' ret~` ,~?a'"r'~, ~;~a s,,,,,y~ „f x .1~r s~ i ~O n,. .r + ,,~~,FiWp'r x?t^S]~~tt~tyv ^s~ a•M ~:+''frot dir~''t y 1.~..
..:i.,~rc;yr; Ir q+f..p .sl,%;, MrtitF,l.~.t}t,ZA~r aSe,,E,r A.Jr a.?r4 rrlCv1 e..+e 7 ,fkx.,~t*'7i+~i L't'K,': .n x' r Z'P. iva3~ kt.',•':!"1..'r'F",hi~+"}~'~,''~E¢ •.r 1
} .,.J..X.'M5 .K. 4 w'ys S r]' S 'taj'w',ti" '!f'It_ll ' :'C 1jT, tr 't~~ K r e t..ra• '~3 &S l,.a ~ . . t'~ga~~~ '•~"Ir+ a" ~ ~9-r 1(zta sr+
e :,r,t~y y r. i S~B 3afts~; x °t:o rReT ,sue x ~:rFrdx^r~i 5t
ryn~r•i'q~~i -.rrN>,4: r',~'rr.r5-,.j*~'.,t'.,;i'•a ~;~..G{•,. ~ ^:ii a~lq r~~+5 w> ~},tu:,•c..:~,ljs: ~i°s ..1~'a'">"v'••, yi ~ a •~~,f. .t`,yn,,, r +:w.,.y I. . yr.?~ ti ~.~e~tx~s~k'Gi-`e~ ;y, ~,r~ "fi''t~ .4a.,
•F: l~'t:>'~5` e~.<> ,ff4N~'~7,n' a"th iC}`~''r• "Q$' a in+f _t . 1 t r 1 ri. rr - 4'~•'•J' J,'s'""-.t;r4??!•. >,'4ANO..; ' L.. 4 , q ' M 'Y '<<Yy`:l . }~''y~` c 3>Y 7 S~ "'9. .dri` :r:S~L~-r''?,e''.
~1.. ; ',A;.e n i7 1i ,~N s ~~,,••ik,.~, r•~(fl ~ , ~ s~ 6 r~t,'Y'r d,{ ~J • ;Y" y ti'vtiy~ . . rSx_'•. T^ 't' 1( `K S;{' e~• `I ar~• 1'ft~,J. '+!rq ` < .9i r R.:.s: :~sy
t ~ t a \ n r~ ,~ti'I 4 d ~ .1"/ ~ A ~'i 3 ~ n > r rs, t~.
K. ,F KS• .'1`°(;rH Jr+.Y tF. Ltf sis..,i1' .a 'w ~,c 4vya ,tL f i,.rt r'tt,"~ga. rsq.'(,`tx;tYH rte yt•! .,L.~}~}'t•', v~'ry r dA-.
+y. 'ti ti: ti- r~l u : < 4, 'Y 4 ~S+r -•n 't nt f~'+5 J' Fl i t A n. J ''}re4._ h'~ w~ ":"S a\ 1;,i;y G. =4.-`;.:;#,,. L e,wl f A.'
rL ,,,ra•,.'Ft. '<'tlv yt u+',,,~n, .f;%3"'SFgt r. t, CE ~r 4, kaf ;t.~y+ r7r,Y1S' F,,,,. ~jt t°~ ~iy~a~i,~tt•` fity ~A t~i~ ~ ~i' ~w'~~'~ 7Q
rt - ia~ t~#. •;)'•'lnl";o£ ri.n , r~•` ut L~Y,}41` *r~•.~r>-.,`~ .s "+g, ,r',"~.k14 ~~tye :Flpex; . j:*e*'p~'.''"` f,^:~fiYK.y'.x '.'F.''tY4 ' :<~'"-?:."r•!„>- x
s; fiaf*tr fi,lc h,y #ru Yfs,•t~:4t ",n t: f° "4: ;yt's§t~}'5~3tr4.Jy mi I!,- ~ ~r x b. ~'~~~r rttiai~A C k i f ~11t ;~at3 a
rts,c:5::-t' i~a Z'., scx. Tt.•. S r. r;r.$d<?;Y~Z .,l4 ..:r: ,.}''tyom ti.f 'mrv d t ,,.;t '~'~t'.3Yt':1_.~~ r• 1,.<'`Yi aia> 1'r ..:r ~`•~:~•.4rT,r .
t c pr? rya,-_ } t : t r . t,. 'S . t w.-yt.tr arCpiY, 2 t `vu. A'#n? . ~w>!-, + 7v ✓'J', so ti +.r. uv 'L~- •
P r ° r ~'t~ rf ~ r f ~ T„} 11} ~Ei 7a Ud..y r',~ ~ ~ . ~''r+.~,-~is f. ` 'i,
:,x .:Jt`'t tii'~~ ru f 1- ~ n,: ti;•~tr ~''v 7b;~7 4" E;'as L~a,7's, VY~ r~, Z rs.~4a r ,~!y F't` i "~.~r:4Qn~ - .e4. 3~'.~
y'` '7J5 °51 1~ 1 A Jim' 2 r z a. et} [ud' ~4 rks "i t.
YI,;'. 3 -E tr i-fil~ its .:jSv T'- 1ti1 5r'•. <Y>-~{~- ti^'f7^' ..4,'`' : ci-y* `;7~~ fK!'R-1, a~+t',~e,~r x~ ^Fi.4'` i>»
,4 r~y~ _.1 r"~7 ;7":? 6~t» r 2 ~ . y4✓ ~r' q ` 5 Q .,Y.. .LK tR .a t •..it rY_ ,i,r,, t. l iq•11_10 t Y
irN'1' .io th,,j';~r4rrsa _ ai ris-fir; rr . 7'r,'::~ i'~t ~a•~t r r~'"ci'- t-, ' KS~~:r,•;;ro a, itt',~ 'u ~,r,lc°:;°P~ .-~i'~ :^'%j
:i<~ ,r, ,:iF„ tr t ~ •i E , sah,..}{,,`.%nF t1`~a.; i• \4i`~'+~v3 i`~"~~r~' '~,'~S~J~,iY cx` st,4'~~tr rte 'n "~~M'f-~F ;~°~3.
F +.r st. se'ik' b!5-Y -7r'i s : Jr;'y^ I ,ar : } \ + 'e:{'S'Y' -'yr.rrl•., t~.. +,SF`rt •i' ^„J. y}".''fG , r,~Xf. s~`Gi:^ • ''S.'„ w v A~r~ Y ,•)y Z
1 "!>~,s'~ G) te.1'1•t , x pl pt.J Saf* '2Ty+r'L: r1 -4',, i f R A ✓ ,54r.}jtt`t,~°'•.~>~'s e ,~2 , r ..!,i"' w0'' ' ' +u n'' 4*~f•Yb•2's•~.4F'N
,7 JI} h'', v~Q ~~A7. , ,w4.i¢ t~ •r uti f a,; rrv,z ^,'l~ $ ? '1,; tt~,:, a, i tit i~ r.~ ~ °jB :1~ .,zF.Ar. ~ ti~i..~ r~~'~W~~
r ~t Lt 1 ' -~.iS+t' +.i,': ,ri:.s :yt ~ v,r4a ~t 4 .~~~J'iLtr-~~,~~<,, 3' iTM~r P~;•t r5~ ~`~2..a`i.fr~~#jd, .1
f4} Sri i r•s CY 4.+;r `i:'>,a FF i 4s}. .z'r .+'T•t'd`~ ~u4„°.?5~~,+~ raEaS. .mt } i=.K>k off n:,-•..~ ~,,..rt'.,r 7r!i•
r :-r"n~ti.r.. .7J<aF `,.✓ri. f1 r ~3 ra :ti. r,.;~n?,:.,,.°„x~4' "~.Y:,F'r"m„'t ,:n,)A t'Y+'l. - ,'•d`;i.•r~~^,t'+
tr, i'~ .kv. park 3.5:gr}r ? ti'- { .~-5: '4~nJ,+ ~~iS;sr jiitts>•Y~i5+1 t,'~. t:dt~tr X; ~'y.4:~, ,~y, yh~ii.~' r ^v~~` ~,.X:r~a-~: .%y.,r: e~~ ~ue
'~f.:.~ zs P1~ ~'i~t r 14: 1' rj t .'tr•" f~r.+.k~ a' t:: .+y~M r •sy r:;ystr ~'~~i,rax ~t~,K:•t<lh,~';:. s"t'';~ ;!'',sn~l'c v,~}'4~; ~ ~;t `.SS~t~~rl'~~' , L~l,-,.~s~•tr,~y~i~r~ "a
t . c ..+r"K•,'.ir Y,~ T Q t 1 . 1 ~a s, R, i 2t .,y`5''~. ~.7 r; , a3ti. .~y~{,~ e"-Ky~ ym~ .a,. t..t f y~~ it
r+b•. t t lrN y,Ry. ' u; ?fv4'~; yt, S:t.}rx:eN• ~rii c~ .'~:..St Si''"+~f'a y7~.~St ,Cr. •t"'y.3.rr- •,r,:;r i F +LriCfe}`..ti: tlr• 3;ry`•.~,
,.1 t jr e w ri~.~'~4-"t..r r, J~ 1 r i~ ,fx rl ' f v - JS ty~w~-. a-1`L. ~.:~•~t.•ti~ •"`4. ~ . `'.k"` y't ~ Mit.J i+`k~ : _ ttc.r r 1'~ K ~ .:5, 4d ~
i ) :r t .x~. e i.t 7 r i6. _ 4 _.r f. ^At,,.r rtl, i. 4r_ 7,'Sy~C'~$,'',a K~s.„v:.l•(y}..t~Ch.',n•t'•g-f. vy~ ;k,.~'` J 1~.~' S` ,e~rgr:y
{ tl,::+ .s? t'~ l ';.y r t , 7T tom. :%.,,tl. 1r,. •KN. as rl 7 i ~`'"i" 4:c't>y 'Ftyt 1~r k?4'4' r • 3 • K~.a ;:h"'i5f .~$`p:. •a^r.gs, ,r i~
rir, s~~^. ° .(is _.rl`„~Ft' ixt . : r, r ~>v N7,..,( ,Yrd d rik:3' ~.i.%tt~r rhr1 t~ r s~'S~r, ~ ~ E ;;'Ar. N:ftp '}~Fts .r i;a;b. x"F•y :t 9.fct ~ ~ •Y3i
t f ~ r} r.1~?.. k c ~ 3,e ,t t r+y';} '"•j+J''~~~' s r ~ h 'k•' 'tY+.r' ~ _ '1 i. ~ ✓ 7 ~'.~~yy
F t w tir j, t t"E-~j E X-, f r . ~ , } , . i 7 'S ~ .x 6y~~~~ ` ~3~ {.~^.f~~,,,-]].~~.s?S4F'', Y aT' ~P^'"t ` t ~ Yp r.'r~..7`C„r K~.~ , ~,r ~S~'~LL'
t ft t - S r ~ r k' k ~ o i,,s,'wp.-~.1J✓ r,.•;4 ixirr'}, '4S• 1;~ KJ~'~~ ~~y5.~ Qf 'Y': 's,C C i, ~r.•rr
r t. ~ s h Jt^ Sn~i rK 3 ,F-~~[2'r' ~ ,1~" 'Y d'- 7 4 ha "yt~~i t''R ~ '
r , r _i r r.; r; 't Sr sit: #e 4 v Fa.l_ fi r~ y°+S i',-S r ~T r .r •J' 'rV
\ ~ r G i r r ~ + t• ~ q 1 of ~r ~•P a/ ~ ~r .ati, ~+B r€~ Er''~ 'fix s, r ,c •r~7.4 a
e T 1 F -y i`~ ri 4./. y.'7t'ysm -x4 s'•,. Y,SjJ t M yr y \
y ~~K' v5 ~ t~1u`tr 'P .f ;?~4 p"~y~l~,r ~~1•ryi 1L~. ,~y
j .I, F .~i , i;•` r'i~ : f -!r t.[t',, `'%,"x .r.'.'1,~ ' ~4 4;'+'f'.ti S`.~ a ~;'f rtn u'';•v ,"s`7-;•.W'Y x2
s r ~ ~ f.;- ` ~ a ~ i . ' ~ f'~,,~t~. -y~4~~;,~:1{gip F ~yrLM1.a', i ri~`"at✓~~ c'~ f t ~rB`r, ~ gf ;t' K~~;t
1 7` Ott J :x ;LV ~9C r•~ 1 i. .,may '2 i7~Fr4h°'^ a:.r'c• [Ays frfi "'~s..~xt ,r,0+7'~:'3P+~r
J r a xc1 c 3 x }t wlri x
jr 4 ~ ~ ~ v~ ; e'~M Es~~f~ ~ r,.~
} r } + ' ~.a. i ~ c aJ J.y_7,"YS.~ie.•.c ``r •:?f~`~.r~+~~- ~ ~ ~•~~F p. 4r c;.i• k. #a J} ~ a i~+s'~X<hTi e r f 'G3','~' ~ r c
' tz 5 + r, ! s < s t', ~3r ~ ( ..u ~„3•+rf~s'"ri~,F ;E ~ ! ¢ ''f a ai ~•trir
t 4 ' { s a tu: $ l3rt'1r 1a•NSSM}
r~ t r 1 t t J ,ts, 5 'S4^,a` 7 ! *a,' ! y :^v
r t: r n 1 .~i b'.$. v.. 7. y fr ~✓w,d# ~ F'?p~at4r rC " j r..i;li `tit •a~' ~.~V"Yr re~ r~ S~'.'~'~? ~'in- 'e, r... •~k
r .1 .t 4- ' r{r ; •e a I . s.. f 7 , .a;3?i',S"-,' a D S. Ars h s+n~A' svx•> •x,~]t.'y~+~
r ti i ; ~ i ;<j ~ St yL, St~t rfi~i1. :~R ~~'tiki',~•., ~yay. ti~~~°~vr.~~k<~^~H-r~4~~"~ ~~y~.~'"4~ ';;;~'#~'r'~r,~t'+~`~t
f 1 Y: 4 f r I . t 5 C r•,l kZ• 4 {'ya y. y. y `ti ' '3. AR~(• . •y„,~+.~'$- +
yr + r, f.n,r F'J„ ~,'4l`i#~tfi"~~'r, SFt.~z~~s:,v~•'~tiY '1' s~~,."r~.~~' ::'N'.J~R,~~,~,
-.r' r t l ':s r . t 7 n.Js',; P'. firi" rw.,,« ^~r,S c
t + I + ri ,✓r 7.. •{~r1v~r.F a•aF~'! a,'+ti'\ r~ ,rhr5}~, wtit{£`tttr, h1~`}~F~~+-~,,~~,yC ~`✓e~, ~ r~~:`ft' ,,~:)•+~S"n'~5?'.~~~'~v'
'
t ( r . f i" / i x > r >+srV k 1..~ \ :emu ttx. Td,,<.:7%w, + b+F + $,?.~i'~s'`~' J^' ) t s.r c
r7Y, r t r i 't r.~ f, a i, :iaY. f' 4 ~"tT..
_ f ( C y 7 4 yet J 4 C'.,.r. Y{ t +y,~` ~~~?F 'a•~'r ,~Z ,~~yF'0.yj"~~,~ oy
~ ~ ~ , ~ :t f \ ,'r a` tct'. w, ? rFjk s 4•~ >n'< • . vA
G J t} :,,t k "l1 \ i 1• f tt r'>;.et'S - s4:; rr3',•': ~is~ -,t. +'i.~y`ay'krA+,rt~•.~'T~/~7t~'~vi,~8.,k~i`t ~,~'ya
Fs 3 # iv' 4~ T"yd"~~~ ~~'~•~re~•tx x3y.44•>. ~Tb. v 1. s''~._
\ i - ~ 7 1,' F. .l\ ' r x.`r. 7 `ti cAt i~S a}.. ~ @ rrd sr ^t~~,lF `qr'y ~ ~~Rti,~ YP =~4&sm'+r',°'c' a~ ; t 7 r ~'ifi +C~~E.cair{,s 3, rt: •t~u•,7~~~. R,3
ti t +tkr 'Kq-5:& .ftaYy~ t~4+ v: Pin ~e :tz Z.Y} 1TYSr~~ br
r i 4 qs, .y i41r tv i t. r~ kk •ic! 5- re •e* r, v ,c rv" s9~ „,,fiY 4, i-r-:~,r,. " ,r. .
r i : r1f , d yk f- e .9i C U ✓k~"'t,'~'~r?a t, v ~~i a `~.Sk""'~, ''•n +t w'
• r f. r tr y✓ Sa n ' ar`3<•r ti+f r „YrN~;c.+.,,7y~~ `.i.• ~`q- "'n ~1e7~
r. ''T .-r 5 r Y < ' 22~'iSp )i ~•}.7 y+r P' ~F^aYr; , a a z , •y,~+rc
t: / t r t S ~rrd 1 r°{.rr(.-r/r°,S-t:+~rn,Aq✓ t~•2+t„y{;rv.. r"k P 4~~+~P:'k,. . rv
r r-4 r T 1+ t ~ x W„tt. ;k rr x t~ y4F~ t Pt r yG'Yt,~~'k[~ : di, eF .,~ix~r 4n~'rt - 4~; .
~;a K `tS r incr. ~r§r1 f;c.~ a'~1~;•ipp°h'i~~~~fp>`~>.y`yb C'r~>,, ka,- a9~:r5` :5s 3rd rj 4,t4£ r.y i
y+ Y r it .r,~ V 44Y''' !l f " vr>2 -~fifi i 'lf _ ~~lt 't ?txi < fi, ;u ,
1 t t h•, 2 t i tyh rr t'F,r3 its #6 u 7?+f7cr.y'S, r,F7'y#l a't `•t" ~.;ftY~7"6,•sn. r >a .k,•r'.t'yi,
r L < rxr r -t' In a k hs +fi °r. `y~l~W ~ ' ^~'ie~
d l }.r t S ror a r .Y 5 i Z t, `Pt{" r A.'ii gr+1 `~A4r ~/~'`yr,~~• t ',v,.~$ tYiY. , ,~y n,f,' iv
f t f t { a> jJ fr' d i rF f i~SH+C "t'Z"'y Z'd4,4f,~ w,; Y'.1 u',N"~:A . y; 4 KCd-CTh Slr^y. °d:1v +1
t t r \ S. ; v t ,JY>`t 7d ...,yq k'ir F'' Pik the",'o a'- k4 ~y, `,c~'- .y. :aN
.s - u rK 1 i r rs"I;' - 4 we d rt3 t~,.s, Yx,j,~ t °.ss >.e ¢~'Y*t'.u .:v~rt. 1 > ,y d j
rr pt Ns i fiy; \ rrtr'~.t it'r"(c fyC >,.Fa;~Yc',:r~t t.. •3 ,
~ Ue~Itnie1d0~9CGpkf7 ~tr~ rc h,. ~ ~ ~'$,~1t,~~f~,~'~i ~ r~, -ta '
4r K i ,k ,r r r" ,Tar >ti,,,rt. r ~i.' H• e `
f e i • } r j 1 to >d 7 c - k Y 1r f'r~ r ff f acf 'h5 r ajf.Y f~- +dj~,~ /c♦ vo-i r.
l 1: i i 31 t '4 1'YTp to t" ~
r 5t y `S r'ro tit f 7 ,~r~ 5 i *e 3r•'~lr`.r~i a t . ~r „3~t j~•°ti .,,~~,~t -F~a7 ~1r' ~
y 2.. I h l 1. t 44 .t.l f~'~"'S c} 5 pr 7n •,:C+a't~,y~~.~.. fp' +ae «n. kcph'~.+dfi ~ `F~ .
~ r ltt f 45, ~1^'e:F~`2~ Vy~~E•~7f~ "+F4. d^.ncJ~ ~ .
y r 1~• S ~ s Sy~f PI•r p?{ury ti^ t~~"~;`a'fe•1'6:..a :y d•yt~y
r r ~ ~ 7 r y .R 5 -1~4r\est' ~pt77 ~'t ~"'3s~ lr ~.r•,la~rr"r3 r~.s'•rR-~4y~~~yt~yF ~ •~i3' y+" a'~Se
a t-'~ i y e ? YrN ;~'•t'`✓}y iyfC't•:.},4,'`3,~yfF cY,r~,,{,.✓"'~` ,;,t*~"•yy . Y
' \ . t i ~ 4 is ~ ~ l r~b~('~` ~ ~y{~~~a ;flf7,*'e Y,.t•1' f~~~`a-t'~.i ,r">~~,~
~ t :r- t t ~ r z r r ~~>zµ1~~ 5 5~~i•.:yi+u~v~• ~t p~k~ ~°r ~~V'r ~ ~r~'~"~f;~A tam
1 Ji; S,r ryf ! ' fl!\ °r3 ~~`-{~C ~^~y ,{i'~~:5y~~l~~ ~t V 'gyp ~y4 y~* e~ ?~`k~"';~'.
6 _ ` \ .t _vt ~ eu3!~f?~+r e ~rw~w9 'G`'-1.7;3f# . "
t S~ t.~t v. S ~bir.-yatii vi.f~+Jryw~.°.r:;~ ~a .&F•r,4~. ..J
F4 ~Lti vy } th ;fl { l to rv ?y1_~ ~1 s.'' f, .
" y 3 y t l1. G
n ,f~-a ,a4+. r1,
gy,*kk `vCY f
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGOM
PUBLIC NOTICL:
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be
scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please
call 503-639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications
Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;
and
Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow
as much !ead-time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the
Thursday preceding the meeting date by calling:
503-639-4171, x309 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for
the Deaf).
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
COUNCIL AGENDA - March 19, 2002 page 1
AGENDA
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING
March 19, 2002
6:30 PM
1. WORKSHOP MEETING;
1.1 Call to Order - City Council
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications ex Liaison Reports
1.5 Call to C;ouncii and Staff for Non Agenda Items
6:35 PM
2. JOINY MEETING WITH TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
REPRESENTATIVES
e Discussion of School District Facilities Bond
7:20 PM
3. ' JOINT MEETING WITH THE LIBRARY BOARD
• Children's Programs
• Annual Survey Results
• Career Resources
• Circulation/Special Collections
• Volunteer Program
• How reading makes a difference in the lives of young people
• Update about the proposed new library
7:50 PM
4. UPDATE ON TRI-MET ACTION PLAN
a. Staff Report: Community Development Staff
b. Council Discussion
8:20 PM
S. DISCUSSION OF STREET MAINTENANCE FEE STUDY REPORT
a. Staff Report: Engineering Staff
b. a Council Discussion
8:40 PM
6. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS FOR COOK PARK CONCESSIONS
a. Staff Report: Public Work: Staff
b. Council Discussion
COUNCIL AGENDA -March 19, 2002 page 2
8:50 PM
7. COUNCIL. LIAISO14 REPORTS
9:00 PM
8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
9:10 PM
9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go Into Executive Session. If
an Executive Session Is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be
announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and
those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news
media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3),
but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held
for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive
Sessions are closed to the public.
9:30 PM
10. ADJOURNMENT
OADWGREEMITY COUNCIL1020319AOC
COUNCIL AGENDA - March 19, 2002 page 3
IN 11 1
AG Eli®A
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS FOR REVIEW
MARCH 19 2002
The Study Session Is held In the Red Rodc Creek Conference Room. Enter at the back of Torun Hall. The
Coundl encourages Interested ddhens to attend air or part of the mee ft. If the number of attendees exceeds
the capacity of the Conference Room, the Council may move the Study Seam to the Town H.A.
e Administrative Items
- Discuss any final questions or issues related to the Review of the City Attorney
Tigard High School Boys Basketball State Champions Invited to the April 9, 2002,
meeting to be recognized
Attendance at the Westside Economic Summit on April 3, 2002
Copies to-
MELVIN f✓ Other:
PRESIDENT N1-tyADAMr1%':'ig.;.?-
JAMES MARK MARK COMPANIES ® Council File
VICE PRESIDENT
MIKE SCHMID
KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS ECONOMIC ALLIANCE
SECRETARY Serving the economic communities of the Sunset Corridor and the Tualatin Valley
BALL JANIK LLP
TREASURER
JACK REARDON March L 18, 200 /02 RECEIVED C.O.T.
WASIIINGTON SQUARE
PAST PRESIDENT MAR 19 200Z
MIKE SALSGIVER
INTEL CORPORATION
Administration
DIRECTORS The Honorable Jim Griffith
DAVID BENNETT Tigard, City of
LANDYE BENNETT BLUMSTEIN 13125 SW Hall Blvd
CONNIE BRINKLEY Tigard, OR 97223
WRIZON NORTHWEST '
STEVE CLARK Mayor Griffith:
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS D 1/00!ear yi741LLL1
Lois DiTMARs
PE•TERKORT TOWNE SQUARE In October 2000, the Westside Economic Alliance, iri collaboration with public and
NORM EDER private sector leaders, formed a Consortium to undertake a strategic initiative designed to
CONKEING FISKUM O MCCORMICK analyze the history of the Westside's economic growth and development since the 1950s.
JIM EDWARDS Particular attention wasp~ven to the conditions that made this remarkable YYth
BIRTCHER PROPERTY SERVICES gi t
TROND INGVALDSEN possible and to identify the best ways to sustain economic growth against fiftm
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY challenges.
JOHN KAYE
Tk"RoNix, INC. The results of this unprecedented study of the Westside's contribution to the region's
DICK OFELMACHER
PACTRU T standar&of living, livability, and economic vitality will be presented at a conference on
JIM PETSCHE April 3rd. The Economic Study, conducted by Joe Cortright of Impresa, Inc., a Portland
NIKE. INc. economic consultant, chronicles the events that shaped Westside business development.
JOHN REES Business and community leaders attending the conference will be challenged to begin
REES D ASSOCIATES shaping local 21- century' strategies that will keep the-Westside the economic engine of
BRIAN WEms F~ GO the region and the state.
KAREN WEYLANDT
PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM I personally avant to thank the Alliance for the leadership they have provided in
RANDY YOUNG undertaking this effort. I join Jim Mark and Steve Clark in urging you to attend the
NORRIS BEGGS & SIMPSON Summit to hear the conclusions of the analysis and to participate in shaping our °~~.~}ees
TOM BRIAN lS`
WASHINGTON COUNTY for the future. The conference runs ftom 7:30am to 2:30pm, at the Embassy Suites
ROB DRAKE Hotel, Washington Square, 5000 SW Washington Square Road, Tigard.
CITY OP BEAVERTON
DAVID LAWRENCE An agenda and registration form are attached. I hope to see you April 3rd.
CITY OF HILLSBORO
Lou OLDEN
CIT Sincerely
CnY OF TuALATIN ,
BETTY ATTEB,RRY
WESTSIDE ECONOMIC ALLIANCE
-i SUSTAINING MEMBERS Tom AMSERGLEN BUSINESS CENTER om Brian, Chair
CENTRAL BETHANY DEVELOPMENT Washington County Commission -
EQUITY OFFICE.
INSIGNIA/ESG -
INTEL CORPORATION "
MELVIN MARK COMPANIES
NIKE. INC. :
PAcTRusr
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _
PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM
PS BUSINESS PARRS M. James Mark, Melvin Mark Companies Steve Clark Commu 1V
QWEST COMMUNICATIONS "'1"~ v°R""pers
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY President, Westside Economic Alliance Chair, Westside Economic Study Team
TEKTRONIX, INC.
CROW RESIDENTIAL
IRM,AIELL
WRIZON NORTHWEST L
WASHINGTON SQUARE iwoo S.W. Nimbus Ax,enue, Suite G-.I, Portland, Oregon 972J;
Phone: 5o3:968.3too o Fax: 503.6:24.o641 • E-mail: „,estside@%%-estside-alliance.org
5
Y
The
WESTSIDE ECONOMIC SUMMIT •
April 3, 2002 Wests
Embassy Suites Hotel-Washington Square
Story
Key to Regional uccess
5Ronsors
➢ Intel Corporation • Landye Bennett Blumstein, LLP • Melvin Mark Companies/Standard Insurance
• Nike, Inc. • Portland General Electric • Providence Health System • West Hills Development
Company • Westside Economic Alliance
➢ Beaverton, City of • Hillsboro, City of • Port of Portland • Tualatin, City of • Wilsonville, City of
➢ Alpha Engineering • Birtcher Property Services • Community Newspapers • PacTrust
• Tektronix • Washington Square • Wells Fargo
Associated General Contractors • Conkling Fiskum & McCormick • GRI • Jordan Schrader PC
• kpff Consulting Engineers • LDC Design Group, Inc. a Mt. Hood Beverage Company • Peterkort
Properties • Tanasboume Center ■ Tualatin Valley Housing Partners • WRG Design, Inc.
Multnomah-Washington Regional Investment Board • Washington County
Agenda
7:30am - 8:00am Registration/Check-In
8:00am - 8:15am Opening: Objectives, Background
8:1 Sam - 9:15am The Westside Economy - Joe Cortright - describe project findings
9:15am - 9:30am Break
9:30am -11:00am Challenges for the Region: Expert Panelists
Each speaker will set some challenges for the region.
Topics:
Metropolitan Areas, Quality of Life and Growth - Mary Jo Waits
a Education, Workforce - Brian Bosworth
■ Developing Sector Strategies for Your Region - Lee Munnich
11:00am -12:00pm breakout Sessions: 3 Sessions same as speakers' topics
12:00pm -1:30pm Lunch
Luncheon Keynote: 21st Century Economics - Brian Dabson
1:30pm - 2:15pm Reconvene to summarize results
Report back led by Expert Panelists & Local Respondents
2:15pm - 2:30pm Wrap Up
S
r
Registration fee is $40.
How to Register:
■ Online at www.westside-alliance.org (calendar section)
■ Or call the registration hotline at 503-968-3100
■ Or fax the following registration form to 503624-0641
■ Or mail the following registration form to:
Westside Economic Alliance
10200 SW Nimbus Ave, Ste G-3
Portland, OR 97223
Registration Information:
Name
Company
Address
Phone # Fax # E-nail
Method of Payment:
Check Enclosed: $
(payable to Westside Economic Alliance)
Please charge my credit card:
VISA Q MasterCard
Card # Expiration
Account Name
Signature
Agenda Item No.
Meeting of _ f 14-1 C~
MINUTES
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING
March 19, 2002
1. WORKSHOP MEETING
1.1 Mayor Griffith called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m.
1.2 Roll Call: Mayor Griffith and Councilors Dirksen, Patton and Scheckla were
present.
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications az Liaison Reports: None
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non Agenda Items: None
City Manager Bill Monahan noted that there were some administrative items
that could be discussed at the end of the meeting.
,2. JOINT MEETING WITH TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
REPRESENTATIVES
Discussion of School District Facilities Bond
Tigard-Tualatin School District Superintendent Steve Lowder introduced Public
Information Officer Susan Stark Haydon, and Rhoda Culin and Jan Kittelson,
members of the School District's Planning Committee. Dr. Lowder said that the
Committee's recommendations have been approved by the School District Board. The
group handed out a booklet entitled, "PlanCom - Now for the Future." A copy of
the booklet is on file in the City Recorder's Office.
Dr. Lowder, Ms. Culin, Ms. Kittelson, Ms. Stark Haydon and Ms. Leland gave a
PowerPoint presentation describing the Committee's process, recommendations, and
the School District's facilities bond measure. A copy of the presentation is on file in
the City Recorder's Office.
Following the presentation, Dr. Lowder provided additional Information on the School
District's financial situation. The District has taken advantage of low bond rates -to
restructure debt, resulting in taxpayer savings of over $1 million. Lowe's Hardware is
located on District property by way of a land lease. This arrangement will bring the
District $30 million over the next 25 years. This money will be used to pay off the
Deer Creek bond, for the administration building, and for other District needs. The
District's annual budget is $83 million, with 80 percent spent on staff and 13 percent
spent on utilities and maintenance. Making upgrades and repairs to school facilities
COUNCIL MINUTES -March 19, 2002 page 1
should result in savings. The passage of Measure 5 created about a $5 million annual
loss of funding for the District. With regard to the State budget, If Measure 13 passes
in May, $220 million will be taken from the school endowment fund for K-12
education this year. If the measure doesn't pass, the District Is facing an additional
financial burden. The District anticipates a $5 million shortfall for the coming school
year. Dr. Lowder continued by saying that even If Measure 13 passes, there will still
be a significant reduction in funding for the District. Some of the options under
consideration for balancing the budget Include:
■ a reduction In the instructional calendar
■ an Increase in class size
■ a prioritization of programs, with only essential programs being funded
■ using money from the local option tax toward the general fund
The District will be making its funding decisions by the end of May or early June.
3. JOINT MEETING WITH THE LIBRARY BOARD
Library Director Margaret Barnes Introduced Library Board members Anne Braun, Jan
Theneil, Jeff Lawton, David Chapman, and Marvin Diamond. Ms. Barnes said that the
Board members were going to give the Council a "show and tell" overview of the
library's programs and services.
• Children's Programs - Ms. Braun
Ms. Braun said that in 2001, 10,051 children and adults attended youth
programs, and 2,306 children and adults attended story and craft time
programs. Ms. Braun brought examples of circulation Items from the toddler
section. She described services, resources and circulat?on items for young adults
and parents.
• Annual. Survey Results - Ms. Barnes
Ms. Barnes described the results of the January 2002 Annual Survey. The
survey had 1,700 respondents. When asked what new library services were
needed, respondents said:
- increased book collection
- additional hours
- quiet reading area
- more computer/Internet stations
- more audiovisual materials
- more children and teen activities
- community meeting space
COUNCIL MINUTES -March 19, 2002 page 2
When asked if they would support funding a new library, respondents said:
yes - 76 percent
no - 22 percent
undecided - 2 percent
Additionally, 70 to 80 percent of the respondents said they had received
either "good" or "excellent" reference or circulation service.
• Career Resources - Ms. Thenell
Ms. Thenell highlighted the library's career and business services and resources.
• How reading makes a difference in the lives of young people - Mr. Lawton
Mr. Lawton talked about how reading can impact youth and described how
books helped his two sons identify and cultivate their interests and hobbies.
• Circulation and Volunteer Program - Mr. Diamond
Mr. Diamond talked about the increase in library circulation over the past
three years. He continued by saying that 150 volunteers contribute 1,000
hours every month. This is the equivalent of sic full-time employees.
Volunteers worked 12,147 hours In 2001. Mr. Diamond discussed the vitality
and energy of the library's readership and the value of volunteers.
• Special Collections - Ms. Barnes
Ms. Barnes brought a sampling of items from the library's special collection.
She described resources available In Spanish, the Northwest collection, and
various other resources in non-print formats.
• Update about the proposed new library - Mr. Chapman
Ms. Barnes handed out a sheet entitled, "New Tigard Library Construction
Committee Presentations." A copy of the handout is on file In the City
Recorder's Office. Mr. Chapman described where new library presentations
have taken place and how many people have viewed the model. He discussed
other methods used to reach the public such as a presentation at the Citizen
Involvement Team meeting and a cable television spot called, "Tigard Public
Library - Past, Present and Future."
Meeting recessed at 7:58 p.m.
Meeting reconvened at 8:10 p.m.
4. UPDATE ON TRI-MET ACTION PLAN
Community Development Director Jim Hendryx Introduced Associate Planner Julia
Hajduk and Planning Manager Barbara Shields. Ms. Hajduk and Shields stated that
improved antra-city bus service and park and ride facilities were a Council goal. They
are in the process of developing a transit action plan to provide staff and Tri-Met with
COUNCIL MINUTES - March 19, 2002 page 3
clear objectives. The transit action plan will include an inventory and analysis, and
information on program development, recommendations, and implementation. The
eight road segments that were identified for study Included:
■ Bonita between Hall and 72n1
■ Durham between 99W and Hall
■ Durham between Hall and the Tualatin Transit Center
■ McDonald between 99W and Hall
■ Gaarde between 99W and Barrows
■ 72"d between 99W and Hampton
■ 72"d between Hunziker and the Tualatin Transit Center
■ Bull Mountain between 99W and Barrows
Potential factors for prioritizing these road segments are as follows:
■ Population
- Minority
- Youth
- Senior
- Low-income
■ Life Needs
- Employment support a education
- Food 8z health
- Social programs
- Employee population
■ Other
- Existing infrastructure in place
- Route identified in Transportation System Plan
- Existing transit opportunities
Exhibit B of the Council packet materials demonstrates the ranking of the road
segments based on the unweighted factors shown above and is on file in the City
Recorder's Office. Information on low-income populations will be available this
summer and may impact these rankings.
Ms. Hajduk and Shields asked the Council if these factors were representative of their
areas of concern and if they wished to provide greater or lesser importance
(weighting) to any of the factors. Council consensus was to give higher, but equal
weighting to low-income, youth and senior populations. Councilor Patton suggested
researching other transit opportunities for these groups and then possibly adjusting the
weighting further. She added that separating employment and education factors may
be helpful.
COUNCIL MINUTES -March 19, 2002 page 4
Mr. Hendryx stated that in the future, Tri-Met has expressed an interest In entering
into Intergovernmental agreements regarding transit service. In response to a question
from the Mayor, Mr. Hendryx said Tri-Met Is more willing to consider providing
service In locations with sidewalks, shelters, lighting, etc.
5. DISCUSSION OF STREET MAINTENANCE FEE STUDY REPORT
City Engineer Gus Duenas Introduced the Chairperson of the Transportation Strategies
Task Force Bev Froude, Vice-Chairperson Paul Owen, and Development Review
Engineer Brian Rager. Mr. Duenas talked about the history and the charge given to the
Task Force. A PowerPoint presentation summarizing the report was made. A copy of
the presentation is on file in the City Recorder's Office.
In response to a question from Councilor Patton, Mr. Duenas stated that it would take
about 10 years to get through the maintenance backlog.
Mr. Rager explained how the study data was acquired, how land use categories were
selected, and how trip generation and rates were calculated.
Councilor Patton confirmed that, along with other recommendations, the Task Force
was proposing to fund right-of-way and sidewalk maintenance only for major
collectors. In response to an inquiry, Mr. Duenas stated that other municipalities had
instituted the fee through council action. Councilor Patton continued by stating that if
Council supported the Task Force recommendations, it could either take action on the
fee or could refer the issue to the voters. The choice is a policy decision. Mr. Duenas
cautioned that in taking on sidewalk and right-of-way maintenance, the city would also
be assuming liability for these areas. Mr. Duenas suggested establishing a dialogue with
businesses most affected by the fee as a "next step."
Mayor Griffith confirmed that in general, residential fees were per unit and non-
residential fees were based on square footage.
Councilor Dirksen stated that he was a member of the Task Force. He added that
given current financial conditions, the funding deficit is expected to continue. The
Task Force considered the following three funding options:
A
• an Increase in an existing tax or adding a new tax
creating a street maintenance fee
o relying on grants and "free money"
COUNCIL MINUTES March 19, 2002 page 5
The Task Force rejected the tax increase/addition option because the tax would
require voter approval. The existing political climate might not support a tax increase.
The Task Force also rejected the grant option, because It does not provide a stable
source of funding for the long-tem n, The remaining option was the street maintenance
fee and the Task Force considers this the best, most equitable solution. Monies
generated by the fee would mean that existing funds could be use for capital projects.
Mr. Owen expressed the Task Force's support of the street maintenance fee option.
Councilor Patton said she was supportive of the user-fee, or street maimenance fee.
Because maintenance and other projects were traditionally funded through the state
gas tax, citizens aren't accustomed to thinking about this issue. Now, as gas tax
funding decreases, the city is at a turning point and must do something to address
maintenance. Otherwise, more costly major reconstruction projects will result.
Councilor Patton concurred with Councilor Dirksen and the Task Force that a user-fee
was the best option to address the problem. She suggested that outreach to those
most affected by the proposed fee be the next phase of the process.
Councilor Scheckla expressed concern about setting a precedent by assessing a fee
without a vote of the people. Other Councilors responded to Councilor Scheckla's
concern.
Mr. Duenas summarized by saying that a street maintenance fee would be a positive
step in funding the much-needed work. He reported that the Task Force would
continue to explore other sources of funding, with an emphasis placed on ldentlfying
funding for major collector improvements. A street maintenance fee would provide
the Task Force with more greater latitude in funding projects.
Mayor Griffith directed Mr. Duenas to begin discussing the proposed street
maintenance fee with those who would be impacted. The Mayor said that the method
of fee implementation could be decided at a later date.
6. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS FOR COOK PARK CONCESSIONS
Public Works Director Ed Wegner introduced this item. He asked the Council for
direction on whether they wished to proceed with construction of a
concession/restroom building as outlined in the 1997 Master Plan and whether they
wanted to negotiate with the Atfalad Recreation District (ARD) regarding an exclusive
concession contract.
COUNCIL. MINUTES -March 19, 2002 page 6
1 NEW
Mr. Wegner indicated that he would expect the concession stand to be open seven
days a week for approximately six months of the year. The exclusive rights of the
concession contract would prevent other vendors and park-goers from selling food in
the park, but would not Impact community events, picnics, etc. If the ARD operates
concessions, they would pay a percentage or specified dollar amount to the city.
These payments would Initially go toward the cost of the building and could
subsequently go to park fees. Discussion of the specific terms of the contract ensued.
Property Manager John Roy asserted that this Is an opportune time to construct the
building as part of the overall park Improvements. The construction industry is slow
and bids would be more competitive.
City Manager Monahan acknowledged that the building will flood and would be built
in such a way as to accommodate water and clean-up. Mr. Roy confirmed that the
vendor will have to work with the Health Department. Mr. Wegner added that
concession equipment will be the property of the vendor and will be removed at the
end of the season. Mr. Monahan mentioned that the vendor may decide to do
business with an exclusive provider such as Coke.
Councilor Patton recounted that the Council wished to build the building and that a
supplement to the agreement with ARD for concession services be pursued. Councilor
Patton summarized the memo from the city attorney which explained why the city did
not need to go out for bid regarding the concession contract. A brief discussion about
the Commission for the Blind ensued.
7. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
Commuter Rail Downtown Task Force
• Councilor Dirksen said the Task Force was reviewing station options and would be
preparing a list of people who will be Invited to work on the project.
Metropolitan Area Communications Commission
Councilor Scheckla reported that he would be attending a meeting tomorrow and
that the Qwest Issue would be discussed.
8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
• The Council had no final questions or Issues relating to the upcoming city attorney
review.
COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1912002 page 7
• The Council was Informed that the Tigard High School Boys Basketball State
Champions had been invited to and would be recognized at the April 9 Council
meeting.
• Councilors Dirksen and Scheckla said they would not attend the Westside
Economic Summit on April 3. Councilor Patton said she may be able to attend.
9. EXECUTIVE SESSION - No Executive Session was held.
Meeting adjourned at 10:08 p.m.
Attest:
Cw6er aston, Deputy City Recorder
a
T yo Ci of r
Date: S-
I: ADM\CATHYXCCAA020319.DOC
COUNCIL MINUTES -March 19, 2002 page 8
AGENDA ITEM #
FOR AGENDA OF March 19.2002
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSLTE/AGENDA TITLE Joint Meeting with Tigard-Tualatin School District (TTSDI Representatives to
Discuss the School District Facilities Bond
DEPT HEAD OK _ TY MGR OK _
PREPARED BY: Cathy Wheatley
C~m W 14
ISFUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Listen to presentation from TTSD representatives and discuss the proposed School District Facilities Bond.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
N/A - Discussion item.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Representatives from the TTSD will attend the March 19, 2002, Council Workshop Session to present to Council
the proposed School Facilities Bond, which will appear on the May 2002 ballot. A copy of the presentation that
will be reviewed with Council is attached.'
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
N/A
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Schools and Education: Goal No. 4 - Government policies will permit the Tigard-Tualatin School District to
prepare for growth and maximize the quality of services it provides students. Strategy: Support policy changes that
will promote the District's ability to provide adequate school facilities.
ATTACHMENT LIST
1. PowerPoint slides that will be shown to the City Council during the March 19, 2002, Council meeting.
FISCAL NOTES
N/A
I:\ADM\PACKET'02\20020319\TTSD AIS.DOC
PlanCom membership
Pla n Co y_- Lisa Albert Fred Holcomb
John Anderson Gimi Jensen ~
Now, for the future JetrBarry Jan Kittelson
• Steve Chrisman Trish McNamara
• Shawn Coleman Brian Moore
Community Forum Presentation Rhoda Culin Stefan Richter
March, 20Q2 Gene Foster Shelley Ruble
• Vanessa Foster Leslie Scheurich
• Jonathan Gray Gene Simshauser
Plancom@ttsd.k I2.or.us Dovina Greco
Superintendent's Charge: Plan Com has also:
• Develop a rolling Long Range Strategic Facility Plan
• PlanCom has: - Weighed the cost benefit ofbuilding new
- Toured district schools; schools vs. spending substantial dollars to make
- Studied 10-year enrollment projections and estimated major structural and safety improvements at
potential maximum student enrollment: older facilities;
- Studied school size research, altemative funding
options and magnet school programs;
- identified property needs for additional school sites;
and proposals for using existing property (taking into
consideration legal deadlinesfor school construction
on the Avery and Alberta Rider properties).
Plan C® Problem:
Now, for the future Aging schools are requiring ongoing,
expensive repairs and creating safety
and security concerns.
Findings:
r? At Tualatin Elementary:
,k Leaks are a constant
problem;
• Ceiling tiles are wet,
stained and regularly
fal, down;
= Classrooms have
~"y•`-':'4 sib exposed, asbestos-
, Y~t•,: ~.n `;M ,
Sent r t.,• wrapped hot water
Asbesws•wrappedheit watrr pipes and ceiling damage at TudaNn Stein 7
. w.~ . pipes; heavy old
The school district is spending substantial x fashioned heaters
dollars repairing major leaks, structural and HVAChang (and sometimes
(heating and ventilating) problems at Tualatin, fall) from the ceilings.
Metzger and C.F. Tigard elementary schools. Towels sop ap water from leaking ceiling
Tualatin Elementary continued: Tualatin continued:
P a' . 10 Ceiling beams in the
i'
F',&2 ohback ramp,for handicap xda~cee~s 4-5 classroom wing
were reinforced after
` f last year's
earthquake; the
repair is considered a
3-year fix.
4 separate classroom buildings and 3 portable On walls throughout
classroom buildings require students to travel outside the school, you can
to use the school's library, gym, cafeteria and/or see numerous
office- creating safer and security concerns. earthquake cracks.
Reinforced ceiling beams in !-S dwsr-
Tualatin continued: Metzger Elementary School:
• When an overnight ® Metzger Elementary is
I located next to Lincoln
ceiling leak damaged
Center and
the class work on her
a„ Washington Square.
teacher's desk---this ~ .
wl.~
n' Tualatin first grader
brought pennies to The school's 42
school to provide the t „ separate entrances
first seed money for and evils make sa et
• ' a new building. Metzger and security a ma or
g• etrgrr portables against the backdrop .l
of Iincoin Center concern.
2
Metzger Elementary continued: Metzger continued
Like Tualatin, Metzger is
• Metzger has 3 separate " fighting an ongoing battle with
i classroom wings and 3 h; leaks. The school smells musty.
portable buildings that
are all detached from the L:. Many classrooms have old-
main school.
fashioned heaters that hang from
ling. The gym's heater is
the cei
Each of those classrooms so NOISthat the PE teacher
have one or more doors uses a microphone to be heard.
that open directly to the outside. The school's laminator can't be
iLm
A basement hallway leads to used when lunch is being
• Most students must travel outside to reach the school's two classrooms created out prepared, because it blows the
library, gym, cafeteria and/or main office of an old locker room. fuses in the main building.
Metzger continued. At C.F. Tigard Elementary School:
• Metzger's music
room is located
behind a curtain
in the cafeteria. A-6 d
• A permanent lift
located in front of the At CF. Tigard, many of the problems are the same:
stage provides access - 3 detached classroom wings and I portable building
to the music room for require students to travel outside to access the library,
students with cafeteria, gym and/or main office
Metzger cafeteria and masic room handicaps. - In one wing and the portable, students must travel
outside to use restrooms.
C.F. Tigard continued. C.F. Tigard continued
• Leaks are a continuing
oblem; ceiling tiles are
pr
C.F. Tigard is crowded; stained and missing;
Lack of extra classrooms
mean larger class sizes Staff members complain
about poor air quality inside
their rooms;
IF
• Small classrooms and
lack of space inside the Continuing HVAC problems
school mean students keep the restrooms as warn
who need extra help or as saunas;
who are working on OW/
There is no storage in the
portable classrooms special projects must Sink in Stk pale cl=mom The drinking water is
work in hallways; brown.
3
Site Selection Explanation
Recommendation:
• Rebuilding Tualatin en the Avery site would:
Rebuild Tualatin Elementary on the Avery
property in Tualatin and C.F. Tigard and - Ensure construction of a school on the Avery property
i MZtZser or. their culleui silts. 1 by the 2010 deadline. (This deadline exists because the
property was acquired by condemnation).
The committee believes it is more cost a edive - The school should be located on the Avery property so
to spend approximately $ I IM each to rebuild the rest of the site can be reserved for possible district
these three schools thwt to spend $7M use or city partnership.
repairing and/or constructing new enclosed
classrooms around a core facility that is - The Tualatin Elementary silo should be kept for future
inadequate and will continue to require major use as the location for the proposed magnet school and
the rest of the property should be reserved for possible
repairs. school district use or city partnership.
• Rebuilding C.F. Tigard on its current site is
recommended because:
• Rebuilding Metzger on its current site is
recommended because: - The committee believes a safe school can be constructed on
the backside of its current site.
- Alternative sites have been investigated and it has been
determined that no other feasible site exists in the - No opposition has been received from C.F. Tigard parents,
Metzger area. a:aff or the community about the recommendation to build
on the current site.
- It is possible to create a safe school on the present
Metzger site by relocating building entrances away - The committee has received opposition from the Fowler
from the street. staff and Fowler neighbors about the possibility of
rebuilding C.F. Tigard on the Tigard Ave. side of the
Fowler property.
• C.F. Tigard continued
- Building the current C.F.T. site would permit the Fowler 1Problem:
property to remain as an outdoor classroom while keeping
it in reserve for future district use or as property to sell to
Metro, the city or to a nature conservancy group as a Marc classrooms are needed
possible park or green space.
for yowl genro!_ lmenas.
• Old Administration site.
- The district should actively seek a long-tern lease for this
site; if this is not financially feasible, the committee
recommends reserving the land as a buffer for C.F. Tigard
or for other district uses.
4
Current Situation • Elementary EA w elementary school is needed to relieve
ercrowding and provide for future
• 10119/01 Elementary Enrollments (9 schools): 5,390
• Elementary School Capacity without ooMbles: 5,190 Bull Mountain continues to be the most rapidly growing
• Elementary School Capacity with portables: 5,615 part of the school district.
• Building a new school on Bull Mountain will relieve
- Currently 450 elementary students are In portable overcrowding at Woodward, Deer Creels and C.R.
classrooms-almost the equltnlent enrollment of an Tigard. All three of these schools serve Bull Mountain
entire school and all are at ar above their enrollment canacities
NOW.
• A new elementary school would serve existing students
and new students moving into this growing community.
New Elementary Capacity
Reeornmendation with Metsaer, C.F.T., Tualatin replacements
• elimination of portables at thou sites only)
and Alberta tuderSchool
Build a 600-student elementary school 6120 students
on the Alberta Rider Property on Bull
Mountain Rd. (at about 133rd) 7.eoa
Jested
cow 114.0
Besides relieving existing overcrowding-and - s9°s ro 0
providing classrooms fortuWre growth-this new New capacay
school would be constructed in time to meet the 2007 - car. c wto r<
fta line that exists because condemnation proceedings s 00D
were started when this property was acquired. 3,000
Classrooms are needed at the middle
Current Situation • Middle Schools school level but the district can't afford to
operate 4 middle schools
• 10/19101 Middle School Enrollments (3 schools): 2,739 Middle
• Middle School Capacity without oortsbla: 2,675 Schools will
• Middle School Capacity WITH portables: 2,800 be over
capacity
beginning
nextyear and
additional
classrooms
are needed
5
Recommendation:
• However----based upon the state's current school • Repair and expand Twallty Noddle School
funding situation---the committee believes there
won't be additional dollars to pay the
aggroximately $2111 in ongoing, operating costs • Expand 1-lazeibrooic Midd- Sii ovi
needed each year for a 4th middle school - - (Hazelbrook was originally built with an enrollment
unless existing programs and staff are cut district- capacity of 800-students. This addition would make it
wide. the same size as the other two middle schools.)
Middle School Capacity
with Twality and
Hazelbrook Additions Current Situation 0 High Schools
3050 students
3,300
eroJ.9a seat • 10/19/01 lilgh Schunl Enrollments (2 schools): 3,636
:M • High School capacity WITH portables: 3,550
a,ooo
= rroJetaoa
2,300 -•-c . w/o ltd
2,000
High school enrollments are over capacity NOW 111kh schools continued:
• The committee also believes that 2000+ student
• Tigard High School enrollments are 108 students above high schools are too large unless smaller learning
capacity and Tualatin High is within 24 students of environments can be created
reaching capacity
I
• Additional classroom space is needed at the high school • Major Improvements are needed inside Tigard
level. However---based upon the current state funding Iligh's core facilities to accommodate existinr and
situation-the committee believes there won't he (blare students. Although upgrades have been
additional dollars available to Pay the approximately made to the front of the school, most interior
$5M in ongoing costs of running a 3rd high school classrooms and facilities haven't been improved
without severely cutting existing programs and starting
levels district-wide. since the 1970'x.
6
II , I
Science classrooms are small; they lack proper
The original Tigard High faeilhy was butt for 500 to 800 ventilation and emergency exits; some were
students Right now, nearly 2,000studenis squeeze through converted from old home economics classrooms and
Tigard High's narrow hallways lack chemical-resistant counters.
Recommendations: Recommendations continued:
Repair and expand the classrooms and interior • Build an off-campus 200-student advanced level
• structure at Tigard High School computer technology magnet program facility.
• Build a 200-student classroom addition at • Double the size of the classroom wing at
Tualatin High Durham Center and upgrade electrical system
in the old Durham School building
• Plan these projects to create smaller learning
environments at both high schools by establishing • These programs will draw students from both high
9th erade academies or schools-within-a school schools and helo relieve overcrowdine.
High School Capacity
Tigard High remodd
Tushlin High Classroom Addition/upgrades
Magnet Program Facility
Durham Center Expansion PPObleif::
-
4050 students Property for future school sites
1.suo F.J. must be purchased while land is still
1.000 - - - - _ - BaiWoal JYX available.
3.sao a
- Capacity
3.000 -.-Ctir. R
3.soo
6
Future school site needs:
Problem:
• Anticipated Needs:
- 10 acres for 11th elementary school Schools built in the 1960's, 70's
- 20 40 acres for possible future high school or middle and 80's need improvements; worn-out
school roofs, heating and ventilating systems,
- 1-2 acres to augment current school sites floor coverings and rotted siding must
• Expected Cosa be replaced.
- 5120,000 per acre inside Urban Growth Boundary
- 560,000 per acre outside Urban Growth Boundary
Recommendations:
• To protect the community's Investment in Its Pl a n Corn
schools:
- ReplaceJloorcoverings and/orheating andventilating Now, for the future
systems at Fowler, Byrom, Woodward and Bridgeport.
Replace rotted siding at Aloodward,• Replace worn-out
roofs at various schools; Upgrade the Templeton Summary and Costs:
!lbraty and music room and provide resJroom access
from inside the school; Improve energy efficiency at the
Tigard Swim Center by replacing the wom out boiler.
Cost estimates:
Cost estimates:
• Protects that improve school safety and reduce
imp-oink, repair and maintenance casts: , •roiects that provide options for the future:
Replace Tualatin, Metzger and C.F. Tigard purchase property for future school sites while
533.4 M land is still available:
$3.24 M
• Projects that provide additional classrooms to
relieve existing overcrowding and serve future growth
Alberta Rider Elementary; repair and expand • Protects that protect the community's investment in
Tigard High and Twality; expand Tualatin High, its schools:
Hazelbrook and Durham Center and build a 200- Repair schools built in the 1960's, 70's & 80's
student magnet school 539.5 M $9.1 M
8
Estimated Taxpayer e'ost: Bond Tax Rate Comparison
• Current Tax Rate per $1,000 assessed value for
• Estimated Project Total: $85 M+ Bonded Debt:
- Beaverton School District $1.67 (includes only 30% of
• Estimated tax rate increase : 91 cents per 2000 bond levy)
$1,000 of assessed value - Hillsboro School District 221
- Sherwood School District S2_63
- Lake Oswego School Disuict $1.44
On a $200,000 home, the property tax - West Linn-Wilsonville School District $2.60
increase would be $182--or about 315 a month.
- Est. 2002 Tigard-Tualatin rate it bonds passed S1_99
o n,
Mow'
The tinning of this election:
i,.
:i
• The May 2002 ballot will require a double ;
majority--50% voter turn-out plus 500/6+1 "yes"
votes
• The committee is recommending the May ballot `f'l" r' taw
because the replacement schools and classroom
additions are needed now. - K Farewell letter to Jorge, Elem-ntary
• Bond rates are the lowest in decades; these sTualatin movin
student who o is is moving
projects should cost taxpayers less money today ° - itr c to a new school.
than if they are postponed into the future.
PlanC®m
Now, for the future
To ask questions or make
comments, please entail:
Plancom@ttsd.kl2.or.us
9
lte~rc
PlanCom
Now, for the future
Community Forum Presentation
March, 2002
PlancomOttsd.kl2.or.us
a
PlanCom membership
• Lisa Albert • Fred Holcomb
John Anderson • Ginni Jensen
• Jeff Barry • Jan 1Kittelson
• Steve Chrisman • Trish McNamara
• Shawn Coleman • Brian Moore
• Rhoda Culin • Stefan Richter
• Gene Foster • Shelley Ruble
• Vanessa Foster • Leslie Scheurich
• Jonathan Gray • Gene Simshauser
• Dovina Greco
1
Superintendent's Charge:
• Develop a rolling Long Range Strategic Facility Plan
• .PlanCom has:
- Toured district schools;
- Studied 10-year enrollment projections and estimated
potential maximum student enrollment;
- Studied school size research, alternative funding
options and magnet school programs;
- identified Property needs for additional school sites;
and proposals for using existing property (taking into
consideration legal deadlines for school construction
on the Avery and Alberta Rider properties).
PlanCom has also:
- Weighed the cost benefit of building new
schools vs. spending substantial dollars to make
major structural and safety improvements at
older facilities;
2
PlanCom
Now, for the future
Findings:
Problem:
Aging schools are requiring ongoing,
expensive repairs and creating safety
and security concerns.
3
Asbestos-wrapped hot water pipes and ceiling damage at Tualatin Elem.
The school district is spending substantial
dollars repairing major leaks, structural and HVAC
(heating and ventilating) problems at Tualatin,
Metzger and C.F. Tigard elementary schools.
At Tualatin Elementary:
V Leaks are a constant
problem;
h Ceiling tiles are wet,
stained and regularly
fall down;
Classrooms have
exposed, asbestos-
sx wrapped hot water
' pipes; heavy old-
fashioned heaters
hang (and sometimes
fall) from the ceilings.
Towels sop up rater from leaking ceiling
4
Tualatin Elementary continued:
rF G {
tch`bb acK rarnp~for clicap ac ~sr "
- 4 separate classroom buildings and 3 portable
classroom buildings require students to travel outside
to use the school's library, gym, cafeteria and/or
office-- creating safety and security concerns.
Tualatin continued:
ry Ceiling beams in the
4-5 classroom wing
' ~i i 'Mil tfi Y/+.t
s were reinforced after
last year's
earthquake; the
repair is considered a
3-year fix.
• On walls throughout
the school, you can
see numerous
earthquake cracks.
Reinforced ceiling beams in 4-5 classroom
5
Tualatin continued:
Ali 111 ~i V When an overnight
ceiling leak damaged
the class work on her
teacher's desk---this
Tualatin first grader
brought pennies to
school to provide the
first seed money for
a new building.
Metzger Elementary School:
• Metzger Elementary is
1 located next to Lincoln
Center and
Washington Square.
• The school's 42
separate entrances
and exits make sa e
Metzger portables against the backdrop and security a major
of Lincoin Center concern.
' 6
Metzger Elementary continued:
• Metzger has 3 separate
classroom wings and 3
portable buildings that
are all detached from the
' p main school.
• Each of those classrooms
have one or more doors
that open directly to the
outside.
• Most students must travel outside to reach the school's
library, gym, cafeteria and/or main office
Metzger continued
Like Tualatin, Metzger is
i} fighting an ongoing battle with
€2` leaks. The school smells musty.
Many classrooms have old-
fashioned heaters that hang from
the ceiling. The gym's heater is
so NOISY that the PE teacher
uses a microphone to be heard.
The school's laminator can't be
A basement hallway leads to used when lunch is being
two classrooms created out prepared, because it blows the
of an old locker room. fuses in the main building.
7
Meg,ger continued:
• P+/Ietzger's music
room is located
behind a curtain
in the cafeteria.
• A permanent lift
located in front of the
stage provides access
to the music room for
students with
Metzger cafeteria and music room handicaps.
At C.F. Tigard Elementary School:
• At C.F. Tigard, many of the problems are the same:
- 3 detached classroom wings and 1 portable building
require students to travel outside to access the library,
cafeteria, gym and/or main office
- In one wing and the portable, students must travel
outside to use restrooms.
8
C.F. Tigard continued:
F,4 C.F. Tigard is crowded;
r' Lack of extra classrooms
mean larger class sizes
• Small classrooms and
lack of space inside the
school mean students
who need extra help or
There is no storage in the who are working on
portable classrooms special projects must
work in hallways;
C.F. Tigard continued
G Leaks are a continuing
problem; ceiling tiles are
stained and missing;
• Staff members complain
about poor air quality inside
their rooms;
• Continuing HVAC problems
keep the restrooms as warm
" x r as saunas;
Sink in 51h grade classroom • The drinking water is
brown.
9
Recommendation:
Rebuild Tualatin Elementary on the Avery
property in Tualatin and C.F. Tigard and
Metzger on their current sites.
The committee believes it is more cost a active
to spend approximately $11M each to rebuild
these three schools than to spend $7M
repairing andlor constructing new enclosed
classrooms around a core facility that is
inadequate and will continue to require major
repairs.
Site Selection Explanation
Rebuilding Tualatin on the Avery site would:
- Ensure construction of a school on the Avery property
by the 2010 deadline. (This deadline exists because the
property was acquired by condemnation).
- The school should be located on the Avery property so
the rest of the site can be reserved for possible district
use or city partnership.
- The Tualatin Elementary site should be kept for future
use as the location for the proposed magnet school and
the rest of the property should be reserved for possible
school district use or city partnership.
10
• Rebuilding Metzger on its current site is
recommended because:
- Alternative sites have been investigated and it has been
determined that no other feasible site exists in the
Metzger area.
- It is possible to create a safe school on the present
Metzger site by relocating building entrances away
from the street.
• Rebuilding C.F. Tigard on its current site is
recommended because:
- The committee believes a safe school can be constructed on
the backside of its current site.
- No opposition has been received from C.F. Tigard parents,
staff or the community about the recommendation to build
on the current site.
- The committee has received opposition from the Fowler
staff and Fowler neighbors about the possibility of
rebuilding C.F. Tigard on the Tigard Ave. side of the
Fowler property.
11
• C.F. Tigard continued
- Building the current C.F.T. site would pennit the Fowler
property to remain as an outdoor classroom while keeping
it in reserve for future district use or as property to sell to
Metro, the city or to a nature conservancy group as a
possible park or green space.
• Old Adminisbution site:
- The district should actively seek a long-term lease for this
site; if this is not financially feasible, the committee
recommends reserving the land as a buffer for C.F. Tigard
or for other district uses.
Problem:
More classrooms are needed
for growing enrollments.
12
Current Situation a Elementary
• 10/19/01 Elementary Enrollments (9 schools): 5,390
• Elementary School Capacity without portables: 5,190
• Elementary School Capacity with portables: 5,615
- Currently 450 elementary students are in portable
classrooms--almost the equivalent enrollment of an
entire school
A new elementary school is needed to relieve
existing overcrowding and provide for future
growth
• Bull Mountain continues to be the most rapidly growing
part of the school district.
• Building a new school on Bull Mountain will relieve
overcrowding at Woodward, Deer Creek and C.F.
Tigard. All three of these schools serve Bull Mountain
and all are at or above their enrollment capacities
NOW.
e
• A new elementary school would serve existing students
and new students moving into this growing community.
13
Recommendation:
Build a 600-student elementary school
on the Alberta Rider Property on Bull
Mountain Rd. (at about 133rd)
Besides relieving existing overcrowding--and
providing classrooms for future growth---this new
school would be constructed in time to meet the 2007
deadline that exists because condemnation proceedings
were started when this property was acquired.
New Elementary Capacity
with Metzger, C.F T., Tualatin replacements
elimination of portables at those sites only)
and Alberta RiderSchool
6120 students
7,000 ojected
6,000 ild-out
i 5978
539 Enr. Projection
5,000 - - New Capacity
- +-Cur. Cap. w/o port.
4,000
3,000
4
14
Current Situation o Middle Schools
• 10/19/01 Middle School_ Enrollments (3 schools): 2,739
• Middle School Capacity without portables: 2,675
• Middle School Capacity WITH portables: 2,500
Classrooms are needed at the middle
school level but the district can't afford to
operate 4 middle schools
Middle
Schools will
be over
capacity
beginning
next year and
additional
M classrooms
are needed
15
• However----based upon the state's current school
funding situation----~Ihe committee believes there
won't be additional dollars to pay the
approximately $2M in ongoing operating costs
needed each year for a 4th middle school
unless existing programs and staff are cut district-
wide.
Recommendation:
• Repair and expand Twality Middle School
• Expand Hazelb rook Middle School
- (Hazelbrook was originally built with an enrollment
capacity of 800-students, This addition would make it
the same size as the'other two middle schools.)
16
Middle School Capacity
with Twality and
Hazelbrook Additions
3050 students
3,500
Proj.Bu d-out
2978
3,000 - - -
28 Projection
-2739-s- - Capacity
-~-,~--~.--,-a--:.---A-a--n--a --~-Ca . w/o portables
2,500
2,000
Current Situation ® High Schools
• 10/19/01 High School Enrollments (2 schools): 3,636
• High School capacity WITH portables: 3,550
17
High school enrollrnent~ are over capacity NOW
• Tigard High School enrollments are 108 students above
capacity and Tualatin High is within 24 students of
reaching capacity
• Additional classroom space is needed at the high school
level. However----based upon the current state funding
situation---the committee believes there won't be
additional dollars available to pay the approximately
$5M in ongoing costs of running a 3rd high school
without severely cutting existing programs and staffing
levels district-wide.
Nigh schools continued.-
• The committee also believes that 2000+ student
high schools are too large unless smaller learning
environments can be created
• Major improvements are needed inside Tigard
High's core facilities to accommodate existing and
future students. Although upgrades have been
made to the front of the school, most interior
classrooms and facilities haven't been improved
since the 1970's.
18
m
The original Tigard High facility was built for 500 to 800
students. Right now, nearly 2,000 students squeeze through
Tigard High's narrow hallways
Science classrooms are small; they lack proper
ventilation and emergency exits; some were
converted from old home economics classrooms and
lack chemical-resistant counters.
19
Recommendations:
• Repair and expand the classrooms and interior
structure at Tigard High School
• Build a 200-student classroom addition at
Tualatin High
• Plan these projects to create smaller learning
environments at both high schools by establishing
9th grade academies or schools-within-a school
Recommendations continued:
• Build an off campus 200-student advanced level
computer technology magnet program facility.
• Double the size of the classroom wing at
Durham Center and upgrade electrical system
in the old Durham School building
• These programs will draw students fry m both high
schools and help relieve overcrowding.
20
High School Capacity
Tigard High remodel
Tualatin High Classroom Addidon/upgrades
Magnet Program Facility
Durham Center Expansion
4050 students
4,500 Proj.
4,000 r - - v - - Build-out
36 392'
3,500 Projection
Capacity
3,000 r--:--Cur. cap. w/ rt.
2,500
2,000
Problem:
Property for future school sites
must be purchased while land is still
available.
21
NOW
Future school site needs:
e Anticipated Needs:
- 10 acres for 11th elementary school
- 2040 acres for possible future high school or middle
school
- 1-2 acres to augment current school sites
• Expected Casts
- $120,000 per acre inside Urban Growth Boundary
- $60,000 per acre outside Urban Growth Boundary
Problem:
Schools built in the 1960's, 70's
and 80's need improvements; worn-out
roofs, heating'and ventilating systems,
floor coverings and rotted siding must
be replaced.
22
a
Recommendations:
• To protect the community's investment in its
schools:
- Replace floor coverings and/or heating and ventilating
systems at Fowler, Byrom, Woodward and Bridgeport.
Replace rotted siding at Woodward; Replace worn-out
roofs at various schools; Upgrade the Templeton
library and music room and provide restroom access
from inside the school, Improve energy efficiency at the
Tigard Swim Center by replacing the worn out boiler.
PlalL.&COM
Now, for the future
Summary and Costs:
23
Cost estimates:
• Proiects that improve school safety and reduce
ongoing repair and maintenance costs:
Replace Tualatin, Metzger and C.F. Tigard
$33.3 M
• Proiects that provide additional classrooms to
relieve existing overcrowdine and serve future jZrowth:
Alberta Rider Elementary; repair and expand
Tigard High and Twality; expand Tualatin High,
Hazelbrook and Durham Center and build a 200-
student magnet school $39.7 M
Cost estimates:
• Proiects that provide options for the future:
Purchase property for future school sites while
land is still available:
$3.2 M
• Proiects that protect the community's investment in
its schools:
Repair schools built in the 1960's, 70's & 80's
$9.7 M
24
Estimated Ipay
Co S
• Estimated Project Total: $85.9
• Estimated tax rate increase : 94 cents per
$1,000 of assessed value
On a $200, 000 home, the property tax
increase would be $188---or about $15.66 a month.
Bond Tax Rate Comparison
• Current Tax Rate per $1,000 assessed value for
Bonded Debt:
- Beaverton School District 1.67 (includes only 30% of
2000 bond levy)
- Hillsboro School District 2.21
- Sherwood School District 2.63
- Lake Oswego School District 1.44
- West Linn-Wilsonville School District 2.60
- Est. 2002 Tigard-Tualatin rate if bonds passed 1.99
25
The timing of f this election:
• The May 2002 ballot will require a double
majority--50% voter-turn-out plus 50%+1 "yes"
votes
• The committee is recommending the May ballot
because the replacement schools and classroom
additions are needed now.
• Bond rates are the lowest in decades; these
projects should cost taxpayers less money today
than if they are postponed into the future.
Namc; :i.-~ ~
ii
t
}y
-
- ~.ry
iy1T" rr-~--- fj7e~&Z
Farewell letter to Jorge,
a Tualatin Elementary
student who is moving
°r . - ,,r - to a new school.
26
'PlanCom
Now, for the future
To ask questions or male
comments, please email:
Plancom@ttsd.kl2.or.us
27
Nand®ul
X-fem 02
,3-l9.02
M
FICS11CU
Now, for the future
Recommendations
to the
Tigard-'Tualatin
School Board
February 21, 2002
PIancom@)ttsd.kI2.or.us
PlanCom Recommendations Summary
i
1. Rebuild Tualatin Elementary on the Avery site $11,095,200
2. Rebuild Metzger Elementary on its current site $11,095,200
3. Rebuild C.F. Tigard on its current site $11,095,200
r
} 4. Build a new elementary school on the Alberta Rider Property
on Bull Mountain $11,095,200
5. Complete major classroom renovations, repairs and
improvements at Tigard High $13,171,339
6. Build a 200-student classroom addition at Tualatin High
and complete needed repairs and improvements $2,900,580
7. Double the size of the classroom wing at Durham Center
and upgrade the electrical system at the old Durham bldg. $2,038,032
8. Build a 200-student magnet school on the current
Tualatin Elem. Site $2,470,800
` 9. Expand and repair Twality Middle School $3,445,038
10. Upgrade HVAC, restrooms and build a covered play area
at Fowler Middle School $2,820,000
1
11. Build a 200-student classroom addition, second gym and
other improvements at Hazelbrook Middle School $4,646,624
12. Expand the library, build a new music room and cut
interior doors to restrooms at Templeton $2,644,350
12a. Build a second floor project area and storage at Templeton $540,000
r
13. Replace worn-out floor coverings and upgrade HVAC
system at Bridgeport $625,476
14. Replace worn-out floor coverings, expand parking lot
and upgrade HVAC at Byrom $770,000
15. Upgrade HVAC, replace rotted exterior siding at Woodward $896,520
16. Upgrade HVAC at Durham $84;000
17. Field Drainage at Deer Creek $54,000
18. Replace the boiler at Tigard Swim Center $95,100
19. Roof replacements at Twality, Durham Center, Tigard High
and Templeton $1,156,412
20. Property purchase $3,240,000
Total $85,979,448
1
Table of Contents
PlanCom Recommendations Narrative White pages
Itemizea Cost for each project Purple pages
Project drawings/schematics Ivory Pages
Appendix Yellow pages
2001 Demographer's 10-year projections
2002 Demographer's projections summary (received Feb. 15)
Architect's Construction Timeline
Tax Rate Chart
School size chart
Estimated costs for operating a 4 h middle school
Election History
May 2000 Local Option Precinct Counts
Facility Needs Checklist
New Media Academy Course Outline
=mini
r
PlanCam membership
® Lisa Albert A Fred Holcomb
w John Anderson ® Ginni Jensen
® Jeff Barry I Jan Kittelson
• Steve Chrisman ® Trish McNamara
® Shawn Coleman ® Brian Moore
® Rhoda Culin • Stefan Richter
® Gene Foster ® Shelley Ruble
® Vanessa Foster ® Leslie Scheurich
® Jonathan Gray ® Gene Simshauser
® Dovina Greco
4
i
Superintendent's Charge:
® Develop a rolling Long Range Strategic Facility Plan which identifies immediate.
5 year and 10-year needs;
This plan should.
- Identify facilities to replace or remodel, as well as new construction needs-
-----and include potential construction timelines;
- It should identify property needs for additional school sites; and proposals
for using existing property and take into consideration legal deadlines for
school construction on the Avery and Alberta Rider properties.
- It sliould consider enrollment projections and operating _dollars needed to
trigger construction of additional schools;
- It should also explore alternatives such as magnet schools and alternative
programs to relieve overcrowding;
- The committee should report to the school board on a regular basis to keep
the board informed of the committee's progress and to allow for mid-stream
corrections and involve the public in responding to the committee's
recommendations before they are finalized;
PlanC'orn has.-
- Toured district schools;
- Studied 10-year enrollment projections and estimated potential maximum
,
student enrollment;
- Studied school size research, alternative funding options and magnet school
programs;
- identified properly needs for additional school sites; and proposals for
using existing property (taking into consideration legal deadlines for school
construction on the Avery and Alberta Rider properties).
PlanC'om has also.
Weighed the cost benefit of building new schools vs. spending substantial dollars
to make major structural and safety improvements at older facilities;
Findings: Aging schools are requiring ongoing,
expensive repairs and creating safety and security
concerns.
r.
.1
I
Asbestos-wrapped hot water pipes and ceiling damage at Tualatin Elem.
E The school district is spending substantial dollars repairing major
leaks, structural and HVAC (heating and ventilating) problems at Tualatin,
Metzger and C.F. Tigard elementary schools
At Tualatin Elementary:
® Leaks are a constant problem;
0 Ceiling tiles are wet, stained and regularly fall down;
® Classrooms have exposed, asbestos- wrapped hot water pipes; heavy old-fashioned
heaters hang (and sometimes fall) from the ceilings.
i
• t
C.•
~rrTowels sop up water from leaking ceiling
;l
'v
t
- 4 separate classroom buildings d
and 3 portable classroom buildings
require students to travel outside to
use the school's library, gym, cafeteria, '
and/or office-creating safety and
security concerns.
- Ceiling beams in the 4-5
classroom wing were reinforced
after last year's earthquake;
the repair is considered a
3-year fix.
- On walls throughout the
school, you can see numerous
earthquake cracks.
When an overnight ceiling leak damaged the class work on her teacher's desk---
this Tualatin first grader brought pennies to school to provide the first seed money for a
new building.
t,
et
z'
r ;
Metzger portables against the backdrop of Lincoln Center
I
At Metzger Elementary School:
Metzger Elementary is located next to Lincoln Center and Washington Square.
® Metzger has 3 separate classroom wings and 3 portable buildings that are all
detached from the main school.
® Each of those classrooms have one or more doors that open directly to the outside.
Most students must travel outside to reach the school's library, gym, cafeteria
and/or main office
® The school's 42 separate entrances and exits make ggfety and security a maior
concern
L
e Like Tualatin, Metzger is fighting an ongoing battle with ;oaks. The school smells
musty.
® Many classrooms have old-fashioned heaters that hang from the ceiling. The gym's
heater is so NOISY that the PE teacher uses a microphone to be heard.
• The school's laminator can't be used when lunch is being prepared, because it
blows the fuses in the main building.
A basement hallway leads to two classrooms
created out of an old locker room.
c
M
-I
i
• Metzger's music room is located behind a curtain in the cafeteria.
• A permanent lift located in front of the stage provides access to the music room for
students with handicaps.
,
i
c V _
r ~
At C.F. Tigard Elementary School:
Many of the problems are the same:
- 3 detached classroom wings and I portable building require students to
travel outside to access the library, cafeteria, gym and/or main office;
- In one wing and the portable, students must travel outside to use restrooms;
- Leaks are a continuing problem; ceiling tiles are stained and missing;
'a The building is old--some parts of the school were built nearly 60 years ago
• Small classrooms and lack of space inside the school mean students who need extra
help or who are working on special projects must work in hallways;
® Lack of extra classrooms mean larger class sizes
® Staff members complain about poor air quality inside their rooms;
Continuing HVAC problems keep the restrooms as warm as saunas;
® The drinking water is brown
i
f A
Sink in 5 1° grade classroom
Recommendation:
Rebuild Tualatin Elementary on the Avery property in Tualatin and C.F. Tigard
and Metzger on their current sites.
Each of these schools would be built with a 600-student capacity in grades K-
5. However, to enable 600 K-5 students to be housed inside the school and not in
portables, two additional classrooms are included in the recommendation. These rooms
would accommodate programs such as Headstart and Early Intervention which already
exist in these schools.
Rationale for Rebuilding:
The committee believes it is more cost e fective to spend approximately $11M
each to rebuild these three schools than to spend an estimated $7M repairing and/or
constructing new enclosed classrooms around a core facility that is inadequate and will
continue to require major repairs.
Site Selection Explanation:
Rebuilding Tualatin on the Avery site would:
- Ensure construction of a school on the Avery property by the 2010 deadline.
(This deadline exists because the property was acquired by condemnation).
The school should be sited so the rest of the site can be reserved for possible
district use or city partnership.
The Tualatin Elem. site would be kept for future use as the location for the
magnet school and the rest of the property should be reserved for possible
school district use or city partnership.
Rebuilding Metzger on its current site is recommended because:
Alternative sites have been investigated and it has been determined that no
other feasible site exists in the Metzger area.
It is possible to create a safe school on the present Metzger site by relocating
building entrances away from the street.
Rebuilding C.F. Tigard on its current is recommended because:
- The committee believes a safe school could be constructed on the backside of
its current site.
- No opposition has been received from C.F. Tigard parents, staff or the
community about the recommendation to build on the current site.
- The committee bm received opposition from the Fowler staff and Fowler
neighbors about the possibility of rebuilding C.F.Tigard on the Tigard Ave.
side of the Fowler property.
- The decision to rebuild C.F. Tigard on its existing site would permit the
Fowler property to remain an outdoor classroom while keeping it in reserve
for future district use or as property to sell to Metro, the city or a nature
conservancy group as a possible park or green space.
- The committee also recommends that the district actively seek a long term
lease for the old Administration building site that adjoins the C.F. Tigard
property. If this is not financially feasible, the committee recommends
reserving this land as a buffer for C.F. Tigard or for other district uses.
Findings: More classrooms are needed for growing enrollments.
Current Situation a Elementary
• 10/19/01 Elementary Enrollments (9 schools): 5,395
® Elementary School Capacity without portables: 5,190
® Elementary School Capacity with portables: 5,615
Currently 450 elementary students are in portable classrooms--almost the
equivalent enrollment of an entire school
See appendix for complete enrollment projections
A new elementary school is needed to relieve existing overcrowding
and provide for future growth
® Bull Mountain continues to be the most rapidly growing part of the school district.
® Building a new school on Bull Mountain will relieve overcrowding at Woodward,
Deer Creek and C.F. Tigard. All three of these schools serve Bull Mountain and
all are at or above their enrollment capacities NOW.
® A new elementary school would serve existing students and new students moving
into this growing community.
Recommendation,
Build a 600-student elementary school on the Alberta Rider property on Bull
Mountain Rd. (at about 133rd)
This recommendation permits the school to be built before the 2007 deadline that
exists because condemnation proceedings were started when the property was acquired.
Like Tualatin, Metzger and C.F. Tigard, this school should be built with a 600-
student capacity in grades K-5 and include two extra classrooms.
New Elementary School Capacity
with Metzger, C.F.T., Tualatin replacements
elimination of portables at those sites only)
and Alberta RiderSchool
6120 students
7,000
Proj. uild-out
-do
6,000 dF
597 Enr.
5395 A . a n o e Projection
59000- New
Capacity
49000 Cur. Cap.
w/o port.
39000"1 moo io-5
1
Current Situation • Diddle School
0 10/19/01 Middle School Enrollments (3 schools): 2,735
® Middle School Capacity without portables: 2,675
® Middle School Capacity with portables: 2,800
• Classrooms are needed at the middle school level, but the district can't afford to
operate 4 middle schools.
'i
T'wality Middle School cafeteria
Middle Schools will be over capacity beginning next year and additional
classrooms are needed.
However----based upon the state's current school funding situation---the
co7ongoing-operating ittee believes there won't be additional dollars to pay the approximately $2M
in costs needled each year [Qr a 4th middle school --unless existing
programs and staff are cut district-wide.
Recommendations:
Repair and expand Twality Middle School by:
- building a "cafeteria/multipurpose commons" (as exists at Fowler and
Hazelbrook) on the front of the school;
- adding a 2-classroom portable;
- updating restrooms;
- replacing floor coverings throughout the building;
- Repairing the HVAC system;
- walling off the balcony of the gym to create additional PE classrooms;
- resurfacing the floor, adding heat and lights to the small gym;
- Adding/replacing student lockers;
- Adding parking;
- Adding a covered area outside;
- Security lighting in the back of the building;
® Expand Hazelbrook Middle School to the same size as the district's other two
middle schools by:
- Building an 8-classroom, 2 science room addition;
- Expanding the commons area;
- Building a 2nd gym in the covered play area location; •
- Building a new covered play area
- New vinyl floor system.
Diddle School Capacity
with Twality and
Hazelbroolk Additions
3050 students
3,500
Proj.Buil -out
39000 ®0 ®Projection
2904 2978
® 2802
273_ Capacity
~
Cur. Cap. who
2,500 portables
2,00®
040 90. %11* 41*
Current Situation * High School
® 10/19/01 High School Enrollments (2 schools): 3,636
® High School Capacity with portables: 3,550
High school enrollments are over capacity NOW
The original Tigard High facility was built for 500 to 800 students. Today,
nearly 2,000 students squeeze through Tigard High's narrow hallways
Tigard High School enrollments are 108 students above capacity and Tualatin
High is within 23 students of reaching capacity.
Additional classroom space is needed at the high school level. However----based
upon the current state funding situation---the committee believes there won't be
additional dollars available to u°v the estimated-$5 in ongoine costs o€ running a
3rd high school without severely cutting existing programs and staffing levels district-
wide.
The committee also believes that 2000+ student high schools are too large unless
smaller learning environments can be created.
Major improvements are needed inside Tigard High's core facilities to
accommodate existing and future students. Although upgrades have been made to
the front of the school, most interior classrooms and facilities haven't been
improved since the 1970's.
• Tigard High's science classrooms are small;
• They lack proper ventilation and emergency exits;
• Some were converted from old home economics classrooms and lack chemical-
resistant counters and plumbing.
INN
Recommendations:
Repair and expand the classrooms and interior structure at Tigard High School.
Build a 200-student classroom addition at Tualatin Iiigh.
Plan these projects to create smaller learning environments at both high schools by
establishing 9th grade academies or schools-within-a school.
Build an off-campus 200-student advanced level computer technology magnet program
facility on the present Tualatin Elementary School site.
Double the size of the classroom wing at Durham Center and upgrade electrical
system in the old Durham School building.
These programs will draw students from both high schools and lp relieve
overcrowding.
_~r
High School Capacity
Tigard. High remodel
Tualatin High Classroom Addition/upgrades
Magnet Program Facility
Durham Center Expansion
4050 students
4,500 . ~t
4,000 ® ~ ® m
3536 3926 Projection
3,500
Capacity
39000 Cur. Cap.
2,500 w/ ort.
2,000
Recommendation:
Purchase property for future school sites while land is still available.
® Anticipated Needs:
- 10 acres for 11th elementary school
- 20-40 acres for possible future high school or middle school
- 1-2 acres to augment current school sites
® Expected Costs
$120,000 per acre inside Urban Growth Boundary
$60,000 per acre outside Urban Growth Boundary
Recommendation:
Protect the community's investment in its schools by repairing schools built in the
1960's, 70's and 80's. Worn-out roofs, heating and ventilating systems, floor
coverings.and rotted siding must be replaced.
® These repairs and improvements include:
- Replacing floor coverings and/or heating and ventilating systems at Fowler,
Byrom, Woodward and Bridgeport.
- Replacing rotted siding at Woodward, Replacing worn-out roofs at various
schools;
- Upgrading the Templeton library and music room and providing restroom
access from inside the school;
- improving energy efficiency at the Tigard Swim Center by replacing the
worn out boiler.
Cost estimates:
• Projects that improve school safety and reduce ongoing repair and maintenance costs:
Replace Tualatin, Metzger and C.F. Tigard
$33.4 M
• Projects that provide additional classrooms to relieve existing overcrowding and
serve future growth:
Build Alberta Rider Elementary; repair and remodel Tigard High; expand
Twality; Hazelbrook Tualatin High, and Durham Center and build a 200-student
magnet school
$39.5 M
• Proiects that provide options for the future:
Purchase property for future school sites while land is still available:
$3.24 M
• Projects that protect the community's investment in its schools:
Repair schools built in the 1960's, 70's & 80's
$9.1 M
Estimated Taxpayer Cost:
• Estimated Project Total: $85 M+
• Estimated tax rate increase : 91 cents per
$1,000 of assessed value
On a $200, 000 home, the property tax increase would be $182---or about $15 a
month.
Bond Tax Date Comparison
® Current Tax Rate per $1,000 assessed value for Bonded Debt:
- Beaverton School District $1.67 (includes only 30% of 2000 bond levy)
- Hillsboro School District 2.2
- Sherwood School District $2.0
- Lake Oswego School District 1.44
- West Linn-Wilsonville School District 2.6
Est. 2002 Tigard-Tualatin rate if bonds passed $1.99
The committee is recommending the May ballot for two reasons: these
replacement schools and classroom additions are needed now and, the lowest bond rates
in decades mean these projects will cost taxpayers less money today than if they are
postponed into the future.
Recommendations for: Future Needs
• No later than 2004-05 review the financial feasibility of;
- building/operating a 4th Middle School;
- the need for an 11th elementary school:
- the need to repair/replace older schools
- The need to expand or build a second magnet school and/or alternative
school
® No later than 2009 review the financial feasibility of;
building/operating a third high school
4
:
V
..t~
W
L7J'
P x ,
41
L,7
~ J7
- iY11 711Y' {qt •+pb 1'311 Lek b1~' AIII~F ~a1. i° ° ° -..1
.
i
i.
L
Farewell letter to Jorge, a Tualatin Elementary student who is moving to a new-and
hopefully non-leaky--school.
BOND PROJECT ESTIMATES
TUALATIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
REBUILD 600 K-5 CAPACITY
Construction:
Per Square Foot $138
Square Feet: Assume 103 sf/student x 650 67,000
Sub-Total $9,246,000
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $1,849,200
Bond Issue Dollars Total Sl 1,095,200
1
DEER CREEK
Construction:
Field Drainage S45,000
Sub-Total $45,000
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. 59,000
Bond Issue Dollars Total $54000
C F TIGARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
REBUILD 600 K-12 CAPACITY
Construction:
Per Square Foot $138
Square Feet: Assume 103 sf/student x 650 67,000
Sub-Total $9,246,000
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $1,849,200
Bond Issue Dollars Total S11 095 200
METZGER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
REBUILD 600 K-5 CAPACITY
Construction:
Per Square Foot S138
Square Feet: Assume 103 sf/student x 650 67,000
Sub-Total $9,246,000
20X for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $1,849,200
Bond Issue Dollars Total $I 1"095 200
ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARYSCHOOL
NEW 600 STUDENT
Construction:
Per Square Foot 5138
Square Feet: Assume 103 sf/student x 650 67,000
Sub-Total 59,246,000
10% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. 51,849,200
Bond Issue Dollars Total 111.095.200
TEMPLETON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Pro ect Feet S Per SF Total
Expand Library, New Music Room & Cut interior 8,326 5150 $1,248,900
Doors to Rtstrooms
New Computer Room
Admin Remodel (Minor) 150,000
Upgrade HVACSysttm 109,000
New Circulation & Restrooms 1,000 135 135,000
Perking 75,000
Kitchen Expansion 45 000
Sub-Total 1,762,900
Accessibility (25%) $440,725
Sub-Total 2,203,625
20X for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $440,725
Bond Issue Dollars Total $2.644,3501
TEMPLETON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
OPTION A
Pro ect Feet $PtrSF Total
Second Floor Project Room/Storage 3,000 5150 5450 ,000
Sub-Total 450,000
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $90,000
Bond Issue Dollars Total $540 000
BRIDGEPORT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Project Ftet S Per SF Total
Replace Floor Covering System 5,041 530 $151,230
Upgrade HVAC Controls 140,000
Fire Alarm System 40,000
Upgrade HVAC System 190,000
Sub-Total 521,230
20X for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $104,245
Bond Issue Dollars Total $625.476
BYROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Protect Feet S Per SF Total
Replace Floor Covering System 5,041 530 $151,230
Additional Parking Lot $150,000
Upgrade HVAC Systems & Controls 190,750
New Clock/Speaker System 65,000
Extend Covered Play Area 8S.000
Sub-Total 641,980
20X for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, ttc. S128,396
Bond Issue Dollars Total $770.376
WOODWARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Project Feet 5 Per SF Total
Replace Floor Covering System 2,920 $30 $87,600
New Exterior Siding $500,000
Upgrade HVAC Controls 110,000
Upgrade HVAC System 49 S00
Sub-Total 747,100
10% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $149,420
Bond Issue Dollars Total $896S20
DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Project Feet S Per SF Total
Upgrade HVAC Controls 70 000
Sub-Total 70,000
20AforFees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, arc. $14,000
Bond Issue Dollars Total $84,000
FOWLER MIDDLE SCHOOL
Project Feet $ PerSF Total
New HVAC System 51,060,000
New Fire Alarm System $250,000
New Track/Athletic Field 500,000
Emergency Generator 125,000
Overlay Parking Lot 125,000
Kitchen, New Flooring System 25,000
Upgrade Admin Restrooms 20,000
Upgrade Health Room Restroom 5,000
Upgrade Stage Restrooms 20,000
Convert to Unisex Accessible Restroom for Staff 20,000
Covered Play Area 200,000
Sub-Total 2,350,000
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $470,000
Bond Issue Dollars Total $2.820.0001
HAZELBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL
Project Feet S Per SF Total
8 Classroom 6 2 Science Rooms 14,400 S145 $2,088,000
Gym (I Court) 5,216 $145 $756,320
Covered Play Area 4,564 73 $333,172
Commons 2,000 145 $290,000
2 Hr. Wall 75,000
Site Work 250,000
Vinyl Floors ® 3 Pod Corridors 30,195
Upgrade HVAC System 24,500
Convert Classroom to Computer Room. 25,000
Sub-Total 3,872,187
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $774,437
Bond Issue Dollars Total $4,646,6241
TWALITY MIDDLE SCHOOL
Prolect Feet 3.°~ SF Total
Add Commons & Kitchen 6,000 5145 5870,000
Kitchen Equipment 51501000
Carpet (3,284 ® S301sy) $98,520
Upgrade Restrooms (12 ® $8,000 each) 96,000
Upgrade HVAC System 84,000
Enclose Upper Gym 50,000
Replace Floor in Small Gym 100,000
Add Student Locker (LS) 25,000
Add Parking 150,000
Security Lighting 10,000
Add Portable and Sprinklers 90,000
Water Quality for Portable I5,0o0
Add Heat and Lights to Small Gym 50,000
Additional Parking 75,000
Covered Play Area 333,172
site work 100.000
Sub-Total 2,296,692
Accessibility (2S%) $574,173
Sub-Total 2,870,865
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $574,173
Bond Issue Dollars Total 53.44S.038
TUALATINi HIGH SCHOOL
Prokxt Se $ Ps►SF Total
200 Student Addition (8Classrooms) 11,400 $1so $1,710,000
Site work $75,000
Overlay North Parking Lot (I) $38,000
Replace Carpet Upper Level $55,650
Repair Small Gym Bleachers 1,500
Repair Window Leaks 5,000
HVAC System 6 Training 51,000
Wire 2 Computer Labs 50,000
Resurface Track & High Jump Area 181,000
Upgrade Irrigation System (LS) 6 Faucets In Atrium 50,000
Add Outside Restrooms at Auditorium 200,000
Sub-Total 2,417, I SO
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $483,430
Bond Issue Dollars Total $2.900.580
TIGARD HIGH SCHOOL
Pro ect S Feet S Per SF Total
IMC, Classroom & Custodial Addition 18,900 VSO 52,835,UOO
Activity, Journalism, Computer Graphic
Tigardnet&Video Productions Addition 14,200 100 $1,420,000
12 Classroom Addition 21,400 150 $3,210,000
Minor Remodel Science Room 110,000
Major Remodel Science Room 3,500 100 350,000
Girls Locker Room, Physical/Health Classrooms Additlo. 11,800 150 1,770,000
Asbestos Abatement and New Flooring 169,616
HVAC System 116,500
Overlay Parking Lot 125,000
Major Remodel Music Room 5,800 150 870 000
Sub-Total 10,976,116
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. 42,195,223
Bond Issue Dollars Total $13.171.339
mom
SWIM CENTERS
i
Project Sq Feet f Per SF Total
Resurface Locker Room Floors 14,250
Boller Replacement f65 000
Sub-Total 79,250
20X for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. f 15,850
Bond Issue Dollars Total $95.100
DURHAM CENTER
Proect Feet $ Per SF Total
10 Classroom Building 111220 5138 $1,548,360
Demolition (LS) $25,000
Covered Walkway 50,000
Upgrade Electrical System 75.000
Sub-Total 1,698,360
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. $339,672
Bond Issue Dollars Total $2 038 032
MAGNET
Pro ct Feet f PerSF Total
Studio, Editing room 6 Classroom 10,000 S 14S f 1,450,000
Add 3 Classrooms m Circulation 3,600 145 $522,000
Add Restrooms 600 145 $87,000
Sub-Total 2,0591000
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc, $411,800
Bond Issue Dollars Total $2.470.800
DISTRICT WIDE PROJECTS
project Feet f PerSF Total
Roof Replacements:
Twality MS in 2002 $261,800
Durham Center in 2002 77,138
Tigard HS In 2003 323,977
Templeton ES in 2004 300 762
963,677
20% for Fees, Furnishings, Permits, Contingencies, etc. S 192,73S
Property Purchase 3,240.000
Bond Issue Dollars Total 54.39 6 412
i
TOTAL BOND PROJECT ESTIMATES
CFTIGARD ES 51110951200
WOODWARD ES $896,520
TEMPLETION ES $2,644,350
TEMPLETION ES OPTION A $540,000
DEER CREEK ES $54,000
DURHAM ES $84,000
MFTZGF? cue 57 D,09S,2:0
BYROM ES 5770,376
TUALA77N ES $11,095,200
BRIDGEPORT ES $625,476
ALBERTA RIDER ES 511,095,200
FOWLER MS $2,820,000
HAZELBR" MS $4,646,624
TWAUTY MS $3,445,038
TUALATIN HS $2,900,580
TIGARD HS $13,171,339
SWIM CENTER $95,100
DURHAM CENTER 52,038,032
MAGNET SCHOOL $2,470,800
DISTRICT WIDE PROJECTS $4,396,412
Bond Issue Dollars Total $85,1979 448
CL
Dies
Olve,
1
pgHgDPi1.
iM.J~q a~egmb s
1 1 e3`~~ * 00
a °Ir"Mdl
"tome
w. nn+o+4 ~i" 5
yiDto eai .1C* 0 ADD 1 iXi
. rtEW
Ovo
.
1 E G~~t~SifJN * oD!C1t~ DE ~ . uEW ~~~~~b
w~ esaR*
3 . ao~ ' a~ s' a ~X
A3 '~Nw~ .1p4~ er •
0 ~09w000
02
DJ ►e'100~ ►q11~~
t'S - -
- - - -
I I I m NV -Id 3 t16U
' I I I
i j I I
o I? I
01, Cj
L
~ iiioiu~l j
x j I I j j_
g x r';7 I r;~l I.
x -
o L-~
Q coon 00000
r
I
I
I
~~tn I
ON ISM aa
t'2131 -AI
$13loll I b
6W?Jl~ 9 l
Q~OQlLS~L~ I
L • ~Qf~ILK I ~ I
[ O51t ~ dS ~b'll i j
NOULMOV
BuninA
1-T
_.-•-.L.r 11 r__ iMq igtl~'.7
- - tu~au.n...vu.w.+.....w~. '
w ~I
I waNac AUVtN3w3,M wod,►e j
Y " I
:
i~
x
:
1 It
\
1 :
1
t ;
r \
i
w
d
a
I
I
I
I
I •
: ~LYC'`LEAUr
E SCKOOI. •
sc.
O r
i«
LL 932&,af x 6150 x 209. 211,499/oW
UL 30005f x 6150 x 2090 =$540,000 (option) o
EXISTING PAVED PARKING AREA 62,030fbW a
0
b
EXISTING
SCHOOL
BUILDING
!?O~Gm 3FJ j t x
r,:.. ti A. iJ (=tom
y"lBii!ie..
v
4 P ~ o
f4l N
V m
I / ~p
II
I I Pl'pj >~`P
b
o
N
P-S
` M70 x'007 O OIJI
4 7O0N0I YiOLJIN `
I
I+
e e E i
.............i moo.. i/
°
vv-- ° onrrur %
J ~ r
el ~ /
• r
\ rnnur °
I °
• e Q
I
o I
e °
_Q
I e e
h e °
~.amua...susus.od
e►7
rep ; . i
~OJYY Y..a....osw.....m ~i
Jam I -
erne
■
i■ I
!:10
; I
~ I
I (
dosed* joA#oV of
° • w w • w w v
t ante i
District Enrollment Projections by Grade
October Enrollment
Actual Projected Change Change Change
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2000-2005 2005-2010 2000-2010
K 813 831 841 848 870 879 902 915 929 943 948
1 869 882 902 912 920 944 954 979 993 1008 1023
2 854 866 878 898 908 916 940 950 975 989 1004
3 893 863 875 887 907 917 925 949 960 985 999
4 978 914 883 895 907 928 938 946 971 982 1008
5 904 992 927 895 908 920 941 951 959 985 996
6 885 914 1003 937 905 918 930 951 961 970 996
7 919 901 930 1021 954 921 935 947 968 978 987
8 878 935 916 946 1038 970 937 951 963 984 995
9 937 934 995 975 1007 1104 1032 997 1012 1025 1047
10 932 937 934 995 975 1007. 1104 1032 997 1012 1025
II 891 912 917 914 973 954 985 1080 1010 975 990
12 768 789 808 812 810 862 845 873 957 895 864
DISTRICr 11521 11670 11809 11935 12082 12240 12368 12521 12655 12731 12882 719 6.2%, 642 5.2'%, 1361 11.8"/,
Change 149 139 126 147 158 128 153 134 76 151
1.3% 1.2% 1.1% 1.2% 1.3% 1.0% 1.2% 1.1% 0.6% 1.2%
Summary by Level of Instruction
Grades K-5 5311 5348 5306 5335 5420 5504 5600 5690 5787 5892 5978 193 3.6%, 474 8.6% 667 12.6%,
Change 37 -42 29 85 84 96 90 97 105 86
0.7% -0.8% 0.5% 1.6% 1.5% 1.7% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.5%
Crades6-8 2682 2750 2849 2904 2897 2809 2802 2849 2892 2932 2973 127 4.70% 169 6.0'% 296 11.0%
Change 68 99 55 -7 -88 -7 47 43 40 46
2.5% 3.6% 1.9% -0.2% -3.0% -0.2%. 1.7% 1.5% 1.4% 1.6%
Grades 9-12 3528 3572 3654 3696 3765 3927 3966 3982 3976 3907 3926 399 11.3%, -1 -0.0% 398 11.3"/,
Change 44 82 42 69 162 39 16 -6 -69 19
1.2 2. 3°'„ 1.1 °/0 1.9% 4.3% 1.0% 0.40.-'o -0.2% -1.7% 0.50••5.
Table 19
District Enrollment Projections by Grade
Actual Projected Change
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2001-2006
K 835 845 852 874 920 938
1 901 913 924 932 956 1006
2 874 900 912 923 931 955
3 889 889 915 928 939 947
4 902 907 907 933 947 958
5 994 915 920 920 946 960
6 918 1009 929 934 934 960
7 899 933 1025 944 949 949
8 918 908 942 1035 953 958
9 928 974 963 999 1098 1011
10 948 934 981 970 1006 1106
11 933 939 925 971 960 996
12 827 848 854 841 883 873
DISTRICT 11766 11914 12049 12204 12422 12617 851 7.2%
Change 148 135 155 218 195
1.3% 1.1% 1.3% 1.8% 1.6%
Summary by Level of Instruction
J
Grades K-5 5395 5369 5430 5510 5639 57 36t32 96.8%
Change -26 61 80 129 125
-0.5% 1.1% 1.5% 2.3% 2.2% 7hrx
~ 201
Grades 6-8 2735 2850 2896 2913 2836 286 4.8%
Change 115 46 17 -77 31 ~ - 4
4.2% 1.6% 0.6% -2.6% 1.1% [d►,
fi+. 2an 1
Grades 9-12 3636 3695 3723 3781 3947 3986 350 9.6%
i
~2Guv. Ga.
Change 59 28 58 166 39
1.6% 0.8% 1.6% 4.4% 1.0%
October enrollment ~Oa Q~ ~D
i
53
i
TTGARI3 TUALATIN NEW MAY BOND ISSUE CALENDAR
SCIKOOL (DISTRICT
60
W
1004 2005
N INI 2002 200.1 4
c" t
BOND ELECTION I I
4 - I
m + 1 i f
v IPROGRAMMINGI SCHFA ATICS I
C-A
d- DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
LAND USE REVIEW. I
CONSTRUCTION DOCUAIENTS
CONSTRUCTION -NCNV
CONSTRUCTION-REMODELS _ - - i j , -
1 s I ~ 1 ~ .
c
LEGEND
A + i
j VACATION i I
mo pi (2 Stale Alwo to) 1111 III Ill' I
i
o
0
,SELIC►/LEFJXUl:DA AR -
tbds&5=l 7WI
■e ei~nm+~m~mnnoeimenm Rr CnMs 1 TTr 910 +3'I
FEB-19-02 05:45PM FROWSNW PUBLIC FINANCE 503-275-8320 T-162 P.02/03 'F-754
Tigard-Tualatin School District
Projected Bond Tags Levy Rates
$95,631,026
Modified Level Debt Service -Plow Bonds
20 Year Issue
Bond Issue Data Dept Ca ac/
Issue Amount: $85,631,028 Max Debt Capacity (7.95% of RMV) (000s): $ 586,991
Estimated Costs of Issuance 8 Original Issue Discount (2.00%): $1,712,621 Outstanding Debt, 60,440
Not Proceeds- 983,918,405 New Bonds: 85,631
Dated Dale: DB/15)2002 Remaining Capacity: $ 440 920
Closing Date: 06/1512002
First Coupon: 12/1512002 Tax Collection
Final Maturity 0611512022 AV Texas
Current Market Rates Plus. 0.50% Year fnerease Year Collected
Term (years): 20.00 2003 4,00% 2003 93.00%
2004 4.00% 2004 95.00%
Property Tax Data 2005 4.00% 2005 97.00%
2001.2002 Assessed Value (000x): S 5.416,678 2006 4.00% 2006 _ 99.00%
2001-2002 Real Market Value (ODOs) $ 7,383,531 Thereafter 3.00% Thereafter 99.00%
Estimated Levy Rates
Assessed Estimated Debt Service Re uirement% $111.000 AV
Fiscal Year Value Prior Lowe's FY Prior Now Combined
Endfn 6/30 ODD* Debt 1 Lease Pmts New Bonds Total 2 • Dsbt Bonds 131 _ Le Rate
2002 $ 5,416,878 S 6,900.248 $ (825,040) S S 6,275,208 $ 1.% $ $ 1.16
2003 5,633,345 6,909,575 (625,040) 4,931,818 11,216,353 1.05 0.94 1.99
2004 5,858,679 6,928,169 (825,040) 5,068,795 11,367,924 1.08 0.91 1.99
2005 6,093,026 6,943,000 (825,040) 5,843,595 11,961,555 1.04 0195 1.99
2006 6.336,747 6.981,463 (708,295) 6.245.995 12.521,163 0.99 • 1.00 1.99
2007 6.526,849 6,982,185 (706,295) 8,620,145 12,896.035 0.96 1.02 1.99
2008 6,722.855 7,004,703 (706,295) 7,020,145 13,318,553 0,94 1.05 1.99
2009 6,924.334 6.251.948 (33,301) 7,492,645 13.71 1,292 0190 1.09 1.99
2010 7,132,064 6,259,908 7,787,445 14,047.353 0.88 1.10 1.99
2011 7,346,026 6,275,378 7,787,943 14,063,320 0.65 1.07 1.93
2012 7.566.407 3,555,613 7,785,783 11,341,395 0.47 1,04 1.51
2013 7,793,399 3,555,438 7,785,120 11.340.558 0.48 1.01 1.47
2014 8,027,201 3,547,913 7,787,515 11,335,428 0.14 0.98 1.42
2015 8,268,017 3,550,663 7,783,765 11,334,428 0,43 0,95 1.36
2018 8,516,058 3,549,336 7,782,900 11,332,238 0.42 0.92 1.34
2017 8,771,639 1,841,875 7,785,713 8,627,5811 0.21 0.90 1.11
2018 9,D34,686 7,785,733 7,785,733 0.87 0.87
2019 9,305,726 - 7,783,693 7,783,893 0.64 0.84
2020 9,584,698 7,786,633 7,786,833 0.62 0.82
2021 9,872,445 7.787.258 7,787,258 0.80 0.80
2022 10,168,618 7,784,313 7,784,313 0,77 0.77
2023 10,473,677
2024 10,787,887
2025 11,111,524
202e 11,444,869
3 87,035.411 (4.652,346) $ 144,235.148 S 226,618,213
Accrued Interest: $
All In True Interest Cost: 5.40%
Average Annual Debi Service, 8 7,211,757
Average Annual Levy Rate (S/S1,000) 0,95
(1) Based on year taxes actually levied rather than FY in which payment is due.
(2) Includes offset from lease payments from Lowe's Hardware.
(3) Includes estimated delinquencies.
Gnpand by sa4n1z.Nw1hwoa1 saeutrtlas Comorad6n
T4ard Sp, 200200. U5,531,C26, N.ndt6ad LD 2.1S6200
School Size
School Year Opened Sq. Fit. w/Portables Property Size Enr. Cap.* 2001 Enr./Max
Bridgeport 1982 64,513. (2) 66,193 14 acres 575 512/708
Byrom 1979 59,435 (4) 62,015 19.9 acres 700 688/688
C.F. Tigard 1945 54,185 (2) 55,865 10 acres 570 606/660
Deer Creek 1997 61,380 15.24 acres 600 611/611
Durham 1989 63,175 7.032 acres 625 620/643
Metzger 1966 52,874 (6) 56,234 9.97 acres 725 637/661
Templeton 1965 48,798 (2) 50,478 12 acres 575 568/650
Tualatin 1939 59,680 (4) 63,040 12.03 acres 545 469/645
Woodward 1979 65,750 (4) 68,330 10.25 acres 700 684/711
Hazelbrook 1992 104,200 (2)105,880 13.91 acres 850 816/816
Fowler 1974 124,488 37.1 acres 950 950/1007
Twality 1960 113,954 (4)117,314 16.11 acres 1,000 982/1044
Tigard High 1953 269,639 (10)269,639 40.09 acres 1,850 1,965/1965
Tualatin High 1992 221,682 65.22 acres 1,700 1,679/1628
Lurham Ctr 1919 8,822 1.396 acres
Old Hibbard 1922 19,180 2.1 acres
Rider Property 7.33 acres
Avery Property 19.8 acres
t
Estimated Cost of opening a new
Middle School for 2002-03
FTE Estimated Cost
Licensed Staff Extra time base on actuals for 00-01:
Regular Classroom Teachers 2.000 $90,967 Licensed Subs
Talented & Gifted 0.500 27,105 Classified Subs 5,133
Restricted Prgms for Students w/ Disab 0.333 15,994 Classified Temps/Over Reg Sal 12,074
Learning Specialist 3.500 168,100 Classified Overtime 3,890
ELL 1.187 60,942 Licensed Extended Responsibly
Counselors 2.000 105,741 Licensed Extended Contracts/Extra Time
SAF Counselor 0.500 26.435 Total Extra 21,097
LS Speech 0.400 21,876
Media Specialist 1.000 52,899 PERS 2,686
Total Licensed Salaries 11.420 570,060 FICA 1,614
Workers Comp 57
Licensed Insurance's 85,650 Unemployment Ins 21
Licensed PERS 76,923 Total Extra Assoc FIR Cost 4,378
Licensed PERS P/U 34,204
Licensed FICA 43,610 Administrators 2.00 170,075
Licensed Workers Comp 1,539
Licensed Unemployment Ins 570 Administrator Insurance's 15,624
Licensed ERP 17,102 Adm PERS 22,950
Total Licensed Assoc P/R Cost 259,597 Adm PERS P/U 10,204
Adm FICA 13.011
Adm Workers Comp 459
Classifgd Staff AJm Unemployment Ins 170
Learning Specialist Asst 3.313 69,438 Adm ERP 5,102
Alternative Education Asst 0.675 13,738 Total Adm Assoc PIR Cost 67,520
IA2 0.500 9,748
Data Coordinator 1.000 26,423 Total Payroll & Benefits 28.471 1,667,310
Counseling Secretary 1.000 26,423
Media Asst 1.000 21,E06 Other Non-Staffing Objects 300.603 279,377
Office Secretaries 4.000 109,188
Custodians 2.000 59,621 Total Est Operating Cost for Fowler 1,946,687
Food Service Staff 1.563 26,545
Total Classified Salaries 15.051 362,729
Classified Insurance's 125,706
Classified PERS 46,175
Classified FICA 27,749
Classified Workers Comp 979
Classified Unemployment Ins 363
Classified ERP 10,882
Total uassiffed Assoc P/R Cost 211,854
excelVmancetcost of middle school for 2002-031
Prepared by Sam f3rugalo tO/tO/Ot
Election History since 1978
Election Outcome % Yes Voter Turnout
September, 1978 Bond Election - Passed 54%
March, 1979 Operating Levy - Passed 58%
March, 1980 Operating Levy - Passed 63%
May, 1980 Tax Base - Passed 540/o
February, 1981 Bond Election - Failed 48%
May, 1981 Bond Election - Passed 53%
May, 1987 Bond Election - Passed 58%
May, 1988 Tax Base - Passed 61%
September, 1989 Bond Election - Passed 58% 47%
May, 1991 Tax Base - Passed 54% 50%
May, 1994 Bond Election - Failed 49% 35%
September, 1994 Bond Election - Failed 47% 40%
May, 1995 Bond Election - Passed 57.5% 42.3%
May, 1996 Bond Election - Passed 52% 42.2%
May, 2000 Local Option - Passed 56% 51.7%
May 16, 2000 a Local Option Tax o Election Results
Reg. Turn-
Precinct Location Voters/Out/% Yes No % Yes
396 Kingsgate/Durham 631/380/600/o 224 137 61%
397 Bull Mtn./D.C./MW 2007/1057/520/o 561 433 56%
399 Metzger 1799/893/49.6% 438 402 52%
400 Metzger/Wash Sq. 2372/1052/44% 520 479 52%
402 Walnut Is./Fowler/CFT 461/240/52% 116 110 51%
403 Gaarde/CFT/MW 3061 / 1603/52% 854 681 55%
404 CFT 2309/1113/48% 595 474 55%
405 Temp./Durham 3255/1622/49% 927 626 59%
406 Temp./Metzger 2916/1325/45% 654 608 51.8%
407 Mtn. View Mobile/DC 613/270/44% 120 135 47%
408 Summerfield 4038/2512/62% 1319 994 57%
410 Beef Bend/DC/MW 886/478/53.9% 224 218 50%
413 Metzger (Ptld City) 304/104/34% 3 0 100%
417 KC/Eldorado 1490/875/58.7% 332 442 42%
419 King City 1728/1290/73% 531 604 46%
420 Tualatin/Byrom 3137/1599/50% 936 606 60%
421 Durham/LO 170/47/27.6% 21 20 51%
422 DC/Bridgeport 35/24/68% 15 9 62%
423 Bridgeport 2430/1028/42% 589 369 61%
428 Deer Creek/Hazelbrook 740/300/400/o 199 80 71%
433 Byrom 2004/1001/49.9% 594 365 61.9%
436 Byrom 505/291/57% 155 121 5G%
437 DC/Hazelbrook 44/27/61% 8 13 38%
438 Byrom 678/314/46% 30 28 51%
Total Washington County 37.982/19,61,5/51.6% 9976 7963 55.6%
252 Bridgeport 1295/671/51.8% 345 121 74%
327 Bridgeport 49.8% 1 4 20%
Total Clackamas County 897/486/54.1% 346 125 73%
Total Vote 38,879/20101/51.7% 10,322 8088 56%
A B D E G I J
1 Elements School
2 Facility Neads BPT BYM CFT DCR DUR MET TEM Mww TUL
3 Air Quali : mold & mildew xxx xxX xxX
4
5 Cafeteria or Kitchen Facilities: small xxx Xxx
6 Ca etin : re lacement needed xxX xxX xxX
7 Classrooms: mores ace needed xxx xxx xxX
8 Covered la area: needed
9
10 Ddnkin water repairs needed xXx xx xxX
11
12 Earth quake: structural damage xxX
13 Earthquake concems because of structure xxX
14 Electrical: repairs needed x xxx
15 Exterior System xxx
16
17 G m space inadequate
18
19 Hallways: narrow xx
20 HVAC: needs repair or replacement xxx xxX Xxx xxX xxX xxX XXX
21
22 Libra : small xxX xxx
23 Locker rooms: need additional space
24 Locker rooms: need repair
25
26 Music room: small or unsuitable not always useable xxX xxX
27
28 Overcrowded classrooms xxX xxX X xxx x xxX
29
30 Parkin : more needed xx xx xx xx xx
31 Plumbing: airs needed xx xx xxX
32
33 Restrooms: need remodeGn x xxX xx
34, Roof: lea a xx xxX xxx
35
36, . cant k)c k dawn school xxx xxx x
37 Safe W. need fencing around school xx xx
38 Safety- n care rcblems/unauthorized visitors xxx x xxX xxX
39 Safte . bus lane safety issue xx
40 Science labs: need upgrading
41 Staff offices: none or not enough
42 IStoracLe: more needed X xX
A B C D
1 Facility Needs FOW HZL TWL
2 Air Quality_ mold & mildew
3
4 Cafeteria or Kitchen Faciities: small X X
5 Car etin : replacement needed XXX XX
6 Classrooms: more space needed XX
7 Covered la area: needed XXX XX
8
9 Drinkin water: repairs needed
10
11 Earth uake: structural damage
12 Earthquake concerns because of structure
13 Electrical: repairs needed XXX
14 Exterior System
15
16 Fire Alarm System: needs replacement XXX
17
18 Generator: needed XXX
19 Gym space inadequate XX
20
21 Hallways: narrow
22 HVAC: needs repair or replacement XXX XXX XXX
23
24 Kitchen Floorin : needs replacement XXX
25
26 Lecture Hall: remodel XXX
27 Library: mail X X
28 Locker rooms: need additional space XX
29 Locker rooms: need repair
30
31 Music room: small or unsuitable not always useable
32
33 Overcrowded classrooms 1XXX XXX XX
34
35 Parkin : more needed XXX
36 Parkin Lot: repairs needed XXX
37 Plumbin : repairs needed
38
39 Restrooms: need remodeling
40 Roof: leakage
41
42 Safet : can't lock down school
43 Safe : need fencing around school
44 Safet : open campus and problems with unauthorized visitors XXX XXX _
45 Safte :bus lane safe issue _
46 Science labs: need upgrading 47 Staff offices: none or not enough
48 Stora e: more needed
Ifirack echnoo Lab: needed XXX
& Athletic Field: replacement needed XXX
A B C
1 Facility _NoodsTHS TUHS
2 A!r Ouaiity: mold & mildew
3 Alr Conditioning:Athletic Office x
5 Cafeteria or Kitchen Facilities: small
8 Cgrpenq. replacement needed XXX
L12 Classrooms: mores ace needed XXX
Classroom renovation xxx
Comuter Lab: more needed xxx
Coveed la ay rea: needed
Drinking water: repairs needed
13
14 Earth quake: structural damage
15 Earthquake concerns bec use of structure xX
16 Electrical: repairs needed xx
17
18 Gym space inadequate
19
20 Hallwa s: narrow XXX
21 HVAC: needs repair or replacement xxx
22
23 Irro ation: upgrade needed x
24
25 Kitchen remodel xX
26
27 Libra : small xxx
28 Locker rooms: need additional space
29 Locker rooms: need repair xx
30
31 Music room: small or unsuitable not always useable
32
33 Overcrowded classrooms Xxx
34
35 Parking- more needed
36 F arkin Lot: repairs Y.X
37 Plumbing: repairs needed xx
38 Press Sox elevator x
39
40 Restrooms: need remodeling xx
41 Restrooms: needed outside x
42 Roof: leaks e
43
44 Safe : can't lock down school
45 Safe : need fencing around school
46 Safe : open campus and problems with unauthorized visitors
47 Safte : bus lane safe issue
48 Science labs: need upgrading XXX
49 Staff offices: none or not enough xxx
50 Stora e: more needed xX
51
52 Track Resurfacin x
7w
AC d my
course proposal
GUS.
Tigard-Tualatin School District
Tigard-Tualatin School District
New Media Academy
Proposal:
We propose a cooperative arrangement with the Tualatin Valley Community Access
(TVCA) to develop a professional quality television studio in undeveloped space within
the newly acquired Sandburg building. This facility would be jointly managed by TTSD
and the TVCA. Tigard-Tualatin School District would use this facility to create the
"New Media Academy." The Academy would provide a natural next step for strong
existing District programs in graphic arts, film studies, writing, and video production.
The purpose of this document is to outline the curricular vision of TTSD staff for the use
of this facility. A document to follow will outline the TVCA vision for the use of the
same facility.
Assumptions:
1. Ever increasing processing power in computers, storage capacity and communications
speed are making it possible to transform traditional text documents into multimedia
creations that contain a mixture of text, static graphics, video and audio components.
It is our assumption that this trend will continue, and that there will be significant
employment opportunities for TTSD graduates who have a facility for the creation of
this "new media."
2. Already strong District programs in graphics arts, theater, english, math, film studies ~t
and a growing number of video production courses have created a pool of students
who need something to carry their interests to the next level of development. The
"New Media Academy" would fill that need.
3. A professional level video production facility is expensive to develop and maintain.
The District does not have the resources to develop multiple facilities so it makes the
most sense to develop a single site that can be shared by students from all of our
schools.
4. Video production is motivating to students. Students learn best when highly
motivated.
5. The necessary cooperative work teams, complex problem solving, very technically
sophisticated equipment, and integration of multiple media make video production a
naturally challenging curriculum for students.
6. Technical programs such as video production provide opportunities for meeting
benchmarks, at the same time giving students real marketable technical skills that can
lead directly to job opportunities for graduates.
7. Production deadlines and presentation to a real audience motivate students to focus
more seriously on their skills necessary to be successful.
8. Community access activities by TVCA will provide another creative avenue for
Academy students who want to achieve an even higher level of sophistication.
Goals:
Career and Life Role Common Curriculum Goals
Students in the New Media Academy will meet the following Grade 12 Career-Related
Learning Standards :
■ Personal Management (perform high quality work on required and self-initiated tasks
and demonstrate behaviors and skills related to a workplace setting)
■ Problem Solve (demonstrate strategies to determine a course of action and develop a
plan to implement the resolution of a workplace problem)
■ Teamwork (examine and use behaviors and skills necessary that contribute to shared
decision-making, problem solving, and goal setting)
■ Communications (apply skills of effective communication to acquire, use, and transfer
information through listening, reading, speaking, writbig, and using media)
■ Workplace Systems (analyze work-related organizations, processes, and procedures)
■ Career Development (research and analyze the world of work to develop career goals
based on analysis of individual characteristics, education and the world of work)
■ Employment Foundations (demonstration academic knowledge and technical skills
required for successful employment in the video production and other media areas)
Career-related leafing standards are knowledge and skills essential for students to succeed in
employment, post-secondary schooling, and other life roles.
Future Paths Curricular Goals (Adapted from the National Education Technology Standards
For Students)
- Technology communication tools
Students use telecommunications to collaborate, publish, and interact with peers,
experts and other audiences.
Students use a variety of media and formats to communicate information and ideas
effectively to multiple audiences.
- Technology productivity tools
Students use technology tools to enhance learning, increase productivity and
promote creativity.
i Students use productivity tools to collaborate in constructing technology -enhanced
+ models, preparing publi at,*ons and producing other creative works.
-Technology problem -solving and decision-making tools
Students u.~ e technolo,6y resources for solving problems and making informed
decisions.
Students employ technology in the development of strategies for solving problems
in the real world
Social, ethical and human issues
Students understand the ethical, cultural and societal issues to technology.
Students practice responsible use of technology systems, information and software.
Students develop positive attitudes towards technology uses that support lifelong
learning, collaboration, personal pursuits and productivity.
Measurement:
New Media Academy Board
• This board will be composed of representatives from industry, TTSD staff, TTSD
students, community, parents and TVCA staff
Student Evaluation
• Internship placements
• Presentation of portfolios
• Meeting industry certification standards
Program Evaluation
• Did is keep students in school to graduation?
Feedback from community and student from instructor-generated surveys.
• Student deMand to participate.
• Industry placement of graduates.
• Graduates continuing into post secondary training.
Proposed Curriculum Schedule
2 Year Program
1st Semester Jr - exisiting pre requisite courses
2nd Semster Jr - to NMA
1st Semester Snr - to NMA
2nd Semester Snr - to NMA Seminar/CAM project
Prerequisite Courses
Attach points-system to each of the following courses presently
offered by the two High Schools? For example;
Computer Graphics I
Computer Graphics II
Film Appreciation
Drama
Music/Theory
Drawing
Painting
Creative Writing
Speech
Jounalism
Multimedia
Newpaper
Tech Crews
Theatre Arts
Dance
Photography
Design Classes
Computer Apps
CAD
Programming
Yearbook
Other Experiential criteria
New Media Academy Curriculum Anita
Semester I
video editing
sound/audio
lighting
camera operation
storyboarding
composition
technical writing
directing
screen presence
copyright/ethics/legal
costumes/makeup
Semester I&II
streaming
actors
cinematography
set design
after effects (motion graphics)
media studies and critical thinking (the power, the message and
influence)
special effects
Semester 11
webcast
production/marketing
career opportunities - practicum/internships
compression
data management/archive
digital network technician
historian
script wiritng
technical vocab
CAM integration project
civic/community connection
Class Structure Proposal
Class Size = 20
No of classes (2 to start - 2 sections of 3hrs each)
1.0 FTE to start
(0.5 to teach and 0.5 to develop the curriculum & tech support)
Equipment and Budget
equipment needs
10 x high end machines (combination) interim budget
2 x iMac DVD-R
data projector 2 x„iMacDVD-R 7850;
Mac server 2 x iMacDVD 1 6192
.
10 x iMac DVD+ 2 12300'
8 x DV Cameras - 1:2 ratio (combo) projector..,•".,• .3.'......,..,. 3000
1
1 x lights s Server 3300
4 x microphone (wireless) and lavalier c ••••••~~~•~~••••~amera"••s • 16000'
<I
batteries and chargers 'fights " 400.1
equipment bags tripods 9001
software (Digi design protoois) mics 16001
1 x audio mixer (industry standard) b9.
as 1000!
.
misc budget items 9""ear
software 150001
adapters .
cords audio mixer 600
- tapes 4... ield.,monitors 1000
- bulbs 2 x ext firewire HDE 500
- disposable stuff Training 5000+
Field monitor(s) @ $269 Dazzle convertor 250!
1 x Dazzle DV-VHS convertor ;
Training - 74892'
based on June 2001 pricing & specs
1733MHz PowerPC G4
256MB SDRAM - 1 DIMM
60GB Ultra ATA drive
Apple Display (15" flat panel) 3500MHz
DVD-R/CD-RW PowerPC G3
NVIDIA GeForce3 - 64MB 256K L2 cache (at 500 MHz)
56K internal modem 256MB SDRAM
Apple Pro Keyboard 20GB Ultra ATA drive
Mac OS - U.S. English CD-RW Drive
RAGE 128 Ultra w/ 16MB
2533MHz PowerPC G4 10/100BASE-T Ethernet
256MB SDRAM - 1 DIMM 56K internal modem
60GB Ultra ATA drive 15-inch display
Apple Display (17" Flat panel) 2 USB ports, 2 FireWire ports
DVD-ROM drive with
DVD-Video
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX - 32MB
Ultra SCSI PCI card & cable
AGENDA ITEM #
FOR AGENDA OF March 19 2002
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Joint Meeting with the Library Board
PREPARED BY: Margaret Barnes DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
This is the regularly scheduled, annual joint meeting between City Council and the Library Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
N/A
INFORMATION RZOAARY
Annual meeting with the Library Board to provide information to the City Council. The Library Board is prepared
to update the Council about the following programs and services.
• Children's Programs
• Annual Survey Results
• Career Resources
• Circulation/Special Collections
• Volunteer Program
• How reading makes a difference in the lives of young people
• Update about the proposed new Library
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Goal #2: A wide array of opportunities for life-long learning are available in a variety of formats and used by the
community.
Goal #3: Adequate facilities are available for efficient delivery of life-long learning programs and services for all
ages.
ATTACHMENT LIST
None.
FISCAL NOTES
None.
New Tigard (Library Construction Committee Presentations
Month Presentations Model Total
gebruarv
Bank of America 150
Chamber of Commerce 50
February CIT Meeting 20
City Council Meeting 20
Summerfield Association 10
Ministerial Association 12
Washington Square Mall 200
Lions 50
Chamber of Commerce 50
Welts Fargo Bank 100
662
March
Charles F. Tigard Parent Support Org. 8
Community Meeting 50
Read Across America 50
Tigard High School Play 400
Tigard High School Play 300
March CIT Meeting '10
Chamber Executive Board 8
Twality Parent Support Org. 8
Mayor's Blue Ribbon Task Force 8
Tigard High School Parent Conferences 200
John Tigard House 20
Breakfast Rotary 30
Chamber of Commerce Board 10
West Coast Bank - Tigard X
8th Grade Parent Orientation X
Tigard High School X
1102
AW!
April CIT Meeting X
City Council Meeting X
Mambo Queens X
Friends Book Sale X
Chamber Night of Shining Stars Event X
Washington Square Mall X
0
MU
May CIT Meeting X
R Ballet De Folklorico Event X
Churches/Businesses X
0
y GRAND TOTAL 474
I:/Lib/connie/ConstCommitteePresentations.xls
New Tigard Library Construction Committee Presentations
Month Presentations Model Total
September
Rotary 60
Rotary A.M. 25
Tigard Senior Center 45
130
tober•
Tigard Saturday Market 150
City Council Meeting 20
Bonita Firs Village Condo HOA 20
Tetrapolitan Kiwanis Club 40
230
Ngvember
November CIT Meeting 20
Tigard High School (2 days) 1000
Tigard Kiwanis Club 20
Eagle Point HOA 20
Tigard Senior Center 20
Tualatin Band at Water Bldg. 80
American Legion Post 158 25
Tigard Senior Center - Knitting group 20
Duilters Lunch 100
Library Volunteer Event 20
Adult Reading Program Gala 85
West Coast Bank - Tigard 200
1610
December
Fowler Jr. High Parent Support Org. 20
Library Open House 100
Administration Staff Meeting 20
City Council Meeting 20
Finance Staff Meeting 20
180
Templeton Parent Support Organization 15
City Council Meeting 20
Tigard-Tualatin School Board Mtg. 20
Little League sign-ups 200
Engineering Staff Meeting 12
Mary Woodward Parent Support Org. 15
Chamber of Commerce 35
Rotary 55
Little League sign-ups 150
Washington Square Mail 200
Public Works Staff Meeting 60
Art Resources of Tigard 8
790
I:/Lib/connie/ConstCommitteePresentations.xls
AGENDA ITEM # ^1
FOR AGENDA OF 3-19-02
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Update on Tri
-Met Action Plan
PREPARED BY: Julia Hajduk GAFF DEPT HEAD OK
CITY MGR OK
/4"61
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Review staff work completed to date and provide comments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
N/A
INFORMATION SUIyIMARY
The City Council has stated one of its goals is to work with Tri-Met to develop intra-city bus service and Park-and-
Ride locations within the City of Tigard. To that end, work has begun on developing a Tri-Met Action Plan which
will serve as a communication tool in discussions with Tri-Met, Metro and neighboring jurisdictions.
In November, 2001, Council received an update from Staff on the work completed on the Action Plan and
informed Council of the direction being taken. Staff has continued to finalize the first step in the Action Plan which
is an inventory and analysis of the population and areas Council indicated as priority during the June, 2001 Council
meeting. It is now necessary for Council to review the information gathered to date and to provide comments on
the prioritization.
Attached (Exhibit A) is the matrix which provides information for each of the geographic areas studied. The
information in the matrix is then quantified in the attached prioritization table (Exhibit B). Staff is asking Council
to review the prioritization table and provide comments. Attachment 1 is a memo summarizing and explaining the
service needs matrix and the prioritization table. It should be noted that several routes such as Bonita Road ranked
lower than expected. While the rankings may change after obtaining the low income census data later this year, it
is critical to insure that the categories are weighted accurately to reflect Council's goals. The questions for Council
are:
1. Is there a population or life need resource that should be weighted higher than others?
2. Does the information gathered address/reflect Council's priority populations accurately?
The Tri-Met Action Plan will help implement Council's goal by acting as a communication tool between the City
of Tigard and Tri-Met. The Action Plan will:
• Inventory -identify the background information that the City has obtained
• Analysis - identify Council priorities and intra-city transit needs
• Program development - timeframes for funding the identified transit priorities
• Recommendations - specific actions necessary to achieve program goals
Tri-Met is developing a transit investment plan which includes several focus areas. Tri-Met will work with the
local jurisdictions in these focus areas to focus investment in transit so that it is consistent with transit and
jurisdiction priorities. Tigard is one of the identified focus areas. It is anticipated that the work completed to date
will expedite the discussions with Tri-Met and that the action plan to be adopted by Council will serve as a
demonstration project for the remaining focus areas. Council will continue to receive updates throughout this
process and will be asked to review and adopt the final Tri-Met Action Plan when it is completed.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not applicable
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Transportation and Traffic Goal #1, Identify alternate transportation modes, encourage uses of alternate modes and
encourage development of alternate modes.
ATTACHMENT LIST
Attachment 1: Memo explaining Tigard transportation service needs matrix and prioritization table
Exhibit A: Service needs matrix
Exhibit B: Prioritization table
FISCAL NOTES
Not applicable
I:lrplan/Julia/3-19-02 tri-met update ais.doc
34-02 3:05 pm
Attachment 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council members
FROM: Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director
RE: Explanation of Tigard Transportation Service Needs Matrix
and Prioritization Table
DATE: March 7, 2002
Attached to this memo is a detailed matrix (Exhibit A) prepared to help prioritize
transit service needs. There are 8 road sections that were reviewed:
Bonita between Hall and 72"d
Durham between 99W and Hall
Durham between Hall and the Tualatin Transit Center
McDonald between 99W and Hall
Gaarde between 99W and Barrows
72nd between 99W and Hampton
72"d between Hunziker and the Tualatin Transit Center
Bull Mountain between 99W and Barrows
Each of these 8 road sections were inventoried based on Council's target
populations and life needs to be met. The following are the areas reviewed
based on Council's priorities:
Youth, senior and low income (low income census data is not available until
spring, 2002)
Access to employment support & education, food & health and social
programs
Staff also considered the existing infra-structure that was in place along these
routes to determine where the City needs to invest capital in order to support
desired transit service or where Tri-Met amenities may be needed or warranted.
The information from the matrix was then evaluated to develop a prioritization
table (Exhibit B). In order to develop a priority, one must consider all issues
combined. If there is an extremely high totai population but relatively few of
Council's target population groups or life needs to be met, then that route will
I Mj
score lower in the priority ranking than a route that has a high minority, youth and
senior percentage and provides access to jobs and life needs resource areas.
Page 2 of the Draft prioritization provides a key which defines the perimeters of
how the points were assigned. The definitions were chosen to reflect a bell type
curve so that each category had some from each range: 2 point 1 point
((3)and 0 point (0).
In order to begin this prioritization staff assigned the same weight of points to
every category across the board. For example, senior population percentage is
worth the same number of points as youth population percentage even though
the actual number of youths is much greater than the number of senior. The
youth population averages 27%, whereas the senior population averages only
6.5% of the total population along the routes studied. Again, this was necessary
in order to reflect Council's priorities.
It should be noted that several routes such as Bonita Road ranked lower than
expected. While the rankings may change after obtaining the low income census
data later this year, it is critical to insure that the categories are weighted
accurately to reflect Council's goals. The question is whether the weighting
provided reflects Council's priorities or whether some areas should be weighted
higher than others. An example might be to assign youth a higher number of
points, total population a moderate number of points, and existing infra-structure
in place a lower number of points. By providing higher weights to areas the
Council considers higher priority, we will be able to accurately reflect Council's
concerns and the City's needs. In addition, it may be necessary to provide a
greater level of review for some of the areas to accurately reflect Council's
concerns and priorities. The category of "existing transit opportunities" was
evaluated to determine if a route in a particular location would provide access to
other transit routes providing service in Tigard. This category does not take into
consideration the distance between the existing transit routes for pedestrians.
This prioritization will be the backbone of the Tri-Met Action Plan that is being
developed by staff for formal adoption by Council. From it, a detailed list of
actions will be derived which will bring the City of Tigard closer to achieving its
desired transit services.
I;Irpln4ulla/tri-met1CC 3-19-02 memo.doc
ra hie
I~eedS bV eo Asea
G
SerVI cture in place
atipll Iufrastrn tueats
d~ Trans °rt Existing Cora
Access OW Side", ccess
access
Ti ar S s►aew
Needs bighting Acces ttal along
elation life Needs to be Met u{ticient to oten route
Targetedpop RAW area souts& Existing p stops
tversity fortransitturn Transit
Ethnic D' amenities goutesi
goal d3 « lies etc) sheltetscouldbe
ce priority c I services B0C 1
y ~ d a3 b R ~ o (shelters ben gidewalks 1 t •neaseme11ts
cter
GQOgraPhied Se ei
For Need Chas o o w O' Locations Yes yes along both behind sidewal
M y R ° v yrio' yes sides of
Bonita @ gaA road frOiu
3 Q d Q a F W No d east hall to
turn west an couldbe
16businesses* 91
2018 emPlOyees outs bound 2nd. Ben ca"MerAs
15 15 345 located in
1583 'tIo Yes udsidewaiitscould~
Total Yes gench~5 hc11e~ ents
nlatiou Fanuo Creek located in easem
$°nita°ad p0P No Yes sidewu
turn Rrive rlo behind
between nd outs Aveauewest Yes
gall and 72 otu aua east bound Yes yes
Ipw Income n Yes
A,V enUe 0 2 2 83 dos Bonita @ 72
79 turn Avenue
Seniors 5~2 outs
b 19 13,
410 a ~t~nonaith
Youth ectingto dt
he helpful rams couldbe attained by coon
O utations trtaY could be
eting ontY p p healthand social ptog or shehets
nim Benches
this route is 2018. thus funds tang a 65 loytnent, food, intersections
Y along au white alone, Aa/o is Over ag routesp education, emp atkey
is a taCe a 19 whereas only rOViding if tum_OUts were desired
~~ual u ~pcnelation transit
Of thispoP • istmg O{{icientR~w
is under of
the ag to ex
210/ the population data available to date access entry ins
of ts i
census ute, however ever
Z„ to of co"
-[here is no low there is"
es along this ro
d resoutc this route. support ttausit facilities, ho
1h few, if d ly n4 (line P381 via service along this toad to
ere ate in place along
gall (line 16) an ',,cVA, is generally
Sidewalk access and infra
placed in easements behind sidewalks
ni
oft ar ga,a Road pAatrix.doc
addressed Met seri,014ceds
••tnetudesbusi,xssts e1\'[ri-IN m
_ ,cR\DEPT`'\L~L~ulia\f ri-m
tructure in place CO cuts
Existing[ntras ~ra1v
Sid¢walk access
¢ Met hung Access to A¢¢ess at route
Needs tob ltg Existing along
Targeted population lite Nerds tcient for
RflW area su & amenities Transit stops
Diversity outs etc.) goutesl
Ethnic transit turn henches~ services
graphic social Y (shelters, Sidewalks
Geo por priority cter a d y °
Location Chara z c c" c a yes alougboth
Needed Service U w 0 locations yes
ding
in 1 O ~ . ts. C6 YesIN° Durham goold @ yes 99W from
all and
„ - Uties an gra
Q d 0 w No turn 99~V East and
10 Businesses, 456
gra
19 139 outs westbound Yes yes Utilities and
161 5034 employees Yes ding
4703 Yes East of Dr.
Total 3 SUU'U '¢1d Yes yes
population 1 l~ WestbOundr yes 1103 iesandgtd ding
DQ1C W est of 113
V'Oad yes Avenue Yes Turnouts could be of
w Income Eastbound NO wtdesign jj,d
beeen l0 19 1559 108' Avenue East yes No Yes Sgtalizedint on
5 s rin ,
99W and 1535 0 Yes & westhouad yes ¢arl
ding
~~V d• Seniors 98i° Avenue u Utiliti
au 72 1114 yes gewestbound
12 43 Yes
Mouth 987 es and
yes No
92° AvenneEast yes
Yes Yes
g, westboundxat1 yes III
No turn Durham @
g1vd. rely 90 employees.
outs and'PpT°,
ulations which includes 19A4 students
of include the high sch be ho pful
uiber does n ulations May d at11a11(line 16)• intersections-
this nu etiug n11°Ority P°p d 95X) an
7A2 however
, thus {ands tats a 65. 9Ax , • ww""11 avid
Y YaCege than e a is over ag at Hwy 99 (hue 12, e Dn:'t
tdentia P°pulation a nth white alon , sit routes outs were desired at th
S 1 under the age °f 19, whereas only ¢xisting " P if turn 2
Total of this Population is a access to insufficient
1210 is tentia] of mote via is currently
al t facies. There
300/0 of the P°p income census ~to available t to his date. route with the 11O ION mete is no s along to support ccansi mom
sever ..life need' resource along this r oad
cnue is g¢ueraliOY inpt Lp, IOSh and4acittic N P
ate s
That
$ldews eaddtesscd°~{CofQ°ihart Hatt. SS Sua
et~Tri-Met Service Needs Matrix.doc
--Includes
rr~---
Existing infrastructure in place Comments
Sidewalk Sidewalk
Targeted population Needs to
Life Needs to be Met Ligkiting Access Existing Access at access
Ethnic Diversity gpVi area s,ffI outs cient & for potential
Geograp along route
hic Location N Transit P
Needed Ser~Ce priority Social y transit turn itoutesl stops
For Character amenities
y c T t $ rw ° (shelters, beaches, etc.} services sides
No shelters
C d 0 O W a Yesl Locations Yes exist, shelters
Q 4 i~ . No yes Yes from Hall could be
No No new locations to 72°'' d laced in
g9 businessest1,054 From 72 dents
649 6 60 27 742 employees * ur to Transit
center,
Total
sidewalk
population 2bus. 1 bus.
Durham only on l
Road Low income 0 2 0 29 side of
26 19 12 225 road.
between Seniors 193 1
Taall Dlvd. youth
Tualatin
Transit
Center
minority Population` may be helpful this mute.
this route is 742• thus funds targeting
St11Yt~ population along a 65. could be attaincd vi3 scvlce along
Total residential a a 19whereas' only 3% is over ag ent food, health and social programs
13% of this population is a race other than white alone, em loyinintersections. Benches or shelters could
transit route providing education ere
30°l0 of the Pop ulation is under d 1a available to date. outs w desired at key
ufficient ROWtf rum
census ins
There is no low income P
this route, however access to existing
There are few, if any, life need resowces along this road to support transit facilities, bowever there is currently
sidewalk access and infra'siructwe is ge nerally in Place along
placed in easements behind sidewalks.
Includes businesses addressed oft of Durham and 74&-
includes
i
(G333\tISR\DF.pT~'~L~ul•+a\Tti-met\Tri-Met Service Nceds Mattix.doc
\\T
3.1-02
Ca AXea in Place om ents
eels ~ ~,eo h►~ Ex~nng►nfrastructure Sidewalk ~ m
n SeCV~ee N Sidewalk access
at~0 Access to Access at along route
~9 Tp11S Uri bighting tial
eds e¢ds to be Met Existing poten
T' ar S eted Yopula"-' Life N gOW area snfC& met°irties Transit Stops
Targ outs 1Loutesi
EthnicDiversity r transitturn benches,ete) seTvices Note-Bike
hic „ w (shelters, Sp°~ $om lanes
priority Social w d M o No
E y R o N S7 to
I~,oca ion's°r ~baracter M bocations Yes existing on
ice w ° Q o u w YeS lee- both sides
NQeded Sere . R s Aw C 0 yeslN° McDonald of
p o fi turn 99w and Mcporiala
i d ~ W - outs st' ghelters to
2114 3049 N0 14o easements
89 sidewalks
2120 38 yeS NO along
Total 103 ave. McDonald
~Dona~d Yopalation East of from 100
_ No turn
outs t° 99w Sh lters in
ea~rnents
Street yes Shelters in
betyeea easeinm'
a~1~ Low income yes yes
99,9 turn p'lv►ara street east yes
No and Westbound yes
~ja11B1Va. outs gaUBlvd.GO)
J~ 4 342 No utin McDOnald
1 2 outs
334 789
88 Hine 12) ~
Yo ~ 669 13 ~8 s maY be helpful ram could be attained via connections to 99 ~
miuoritY P°polanon social ptOg behind sidewa
etu 1oYrrrcut, foodshealth and easements
this route is 3049• thus funds tang e b5. laced in
education, emP couldbe P
SU Y • ulation along white alone, 11%is over ag LQViamg $enches or shelters
rdenualpoP is a race other di 19 whereas only
Total res ulauon dec the age of transit routes P 4
lp°/° of th>s P°p exis<ing k¢ intersections•
~acome ens daiaavailable to date.
2b%°f d1e ~p ' ~ wever access to rf mm-out were desired at Y
no low m urces along this toute,bo
Tbece ently msufficientR~w
,U1eYe are few, if any,life needreso these is curt
lwe 16)• eture is limited along this toad and
Hall i fm_Stm It traustt routes.
Sidewalk access and in dea to sV'w
entnee iceNecdsMatrix.doc
~frastructwe invesan Met Serv
is ~ ~ ulia\f{i-met\Tti-
.,..,,nF.7fS
Geographic Targeted Population Needs
Location For Priority Social Ethnic Diversity Life Needs to be Met Existing Infrastructure in Place
Needed Service Character
h ROW area sufficient Lighting Access to Sidewalk Sidewalk Comments
a n o w = R for transit turn outs & Existing Access at access along
' h s U c `o o d o o amenities Transit potential route
3 `a Q O w x co (shelters, benches, etc.) Routes/ stops
E°. W y W services
Yes/No Locations
Gaarde Total 6030 88 620 491 7229 No 99W @ Yes Yes Yes Both sides until
Population Gaarde north of 110"
Street east &
between westbound
No turn 112 Ave Yes Yes Yes Occasionally Shelters could be
99W and outs East and paved on one incorporated into 02/02
westbound side to 121st Gaarde St. improvements
Barrows No turn 115 Ave Yes No Yes Shelters could be
Road outs East and incorporated into 02102
westbound Gaarde St. improvements
Low Income No turn 121x` ave Yes No Yes Both sides 121" Shelters could be
outs east and to Walnut & incorporated into 02/02
westbound 132nd Gaarde St. improvements
No turn 129 ave Yes No Yes Shelters & benches in
outs east and easements
westbound
Seniors 472 1 24 7 504 No turn 132" ave Yes No Yes Shelters and benches in
outs east and easements
westbound
No turn Walnut Street Yes No Yes 1 side of road Westbound may have
outs @ 132"d room for turnout East
East and bound no room
westbound
Youth 1815 39 228 232 2314 No 135ave @ Yes No Yes Both sides Westbound shelter could
Walnut Benish to be installed on City
Nortliview property
r0--tstu- Walnut st. @ Yes No Yes 1 side in front Westbound turnout could
Barrows Rd. of Albertson's be installed on City
east and property
westbound
\\TIG333\USR\ )EPTS\LRPLNUulia\TH-met\Tri-Met Service Needs Matrix.doc
3-1-02 5
o ulations may be helpful social Programs e, ddbc
S MARY this route is 7229* etin tuinority P P en4 food health and ulation a b5. education emPloym
along
Total restdenual pop 6% is over ag it routes providing be
population is a race other than white alone, thus fun r Teas
only however access to existing train
17% of this pop intersections. Benches or shelters could
Population is under datage available
e desired at key
32% of the to date• the intersection with 9
y outs wer
w uicome tens
There is no lo eed resources along this route (other than at
cltol}s S crrt (line 62)• however there is curren0 insufficient ROW if turn
There are few, if an, v. life n\Vtlore 12) and S transit facilities,
attained via connection to 9~ lace along this road to support rovements in several locations.
Side ated into 0212002 Gaarde
stntcture is eencrally in P or
access St. imp
walk and infra
Placed casements behind sidewalks and could be taco
6
, low
"i3'.USR',DEPTS LRPI NVuGa "fri-met Tri-Atct Service Needs `tatris.doc
3_1-02
111 ljj~
Geographic Targeted Population Needs
Location For Priorih• Social Ethnic Diversity Life Needs to be Met Existing Infrastructure in Place
Needed Service Character
IZONN' area sufficient for Lighting Access to Sidewalk Sidewalk Comments
c+ zw, v -r, transit turn outs & Existing Access at access along
•L U L 5X amenities Transit Potential route
f : c n (shelters, benches, etc.) Routes/ stops
E= E services
W Yes/No Locations
.72nd Total 702 15 17 80 814 93 Businesses/1044 No turn 72nd Avenue @ Yes Yes Yes 1 side for
Population employees" outs 99W portions
Avenue between 99W
between and
Dartmouth
99W and Low Income 6 6 4 No turn Dartmouth Yes No Yes None
outs East and between
Hampton westbound Dartmouth
Street and Hermoso
Seniors 78 0 1 1 80 No turn Beveland Yes Yes Yes 1 side Eastbound shelters
outs East and Hermoso to could be installed in
westbound Beveland front of Lowes Home
Improvements.
Westbound shelters
in easements
Youth 134 3 1 31 169 No tum Hampton Yes Yes yes 1 side from
outs Street @ 72"d Beveland to
Hampton
SUMMARY
Total residential population along this route is 814.
14% of this population is a race other than white alone, thus funds targeting minority populations may be helpful
20% of the population is under the age of 19 whereas only 9% is over age 65.
There is no low income census data available to date.
There are several life need resources along this route. Existing bus service (line 78) provides service every 30 minutes within walking distance of 72"d. Additional access to existing transit routes providing education,
employment, food, health and social programs could be attained via connections to other transit lines along this route.
Sidewalk access and infra-structure is generally in place along this road to support transit facilities, however there is currently insufficient ROW if turn-outs were desired at key intersections. Benches or shelters could be
placed in easements behind sidewalks.
-Includes businesses addressed olrof V2 Clinton, Dartmouth Beveland, Gonraga and Hampton (7000 Block only)
\\TIG333\USR\ )EPTS\ RPLNUulia\Tri-met\Tri-Met Service Needs Matrix.doc
3-1-02 7
S
~~1~~`rY ra hie Ares
ds b Geo
Service Nee place comments
tiou Infrastructure in Sidewalk
d? Tra{is Ort2l Existing Sidewalk access
~i ar 5
Access to Access to along route
Met Lighting Existing
elation Needs ecds to be potential
eted Pop Life q p;~W area suf{icientfor Transit stops
Targ N sit turn outs goutesi
Ethnic Diversity trait
~ amenities services etc) No shelters.
graphicLocation Social c c c (shelters,benchesi Atleastl Bhes
Geo ded Service Priority cter yes
for N~ Chars c e u x a Lions side for ex
Loca Yes is
o U o ty Yesl Yes most of th Shelters
u y 0 W N° o new locations $ectionOn could be
Q~d w Noe al
No OBIS with Places tn businesses) **A91 gum easmnen's
820 381 emPlOyees outs both sides
4 29 161 or none
620 25 bus- 6 bus-
Total 6 bas.
Ird Asenue population
2 47
p 3
3 7 57 214
w
betWee Income 42
S niors 1A"1
-AUVAlker Youtl+
Street and
i uila to additional resources couldbe anatned
rf ran 54t
maybc116110l 30 minutes e hours. Aces
C•` enter minority Populations during P
ute is $20• us funds ta:g eting but only runs every h exist and shelters could
65.
MARY this to' Sn/0 is over age 3S)
f white aloneo Y gxisting lme exists
• Benc
other titan ections
race whereas
talles nal poPu is latien er along thea o 19 bus service ( inters
To
und ag le to date. atkey
24% of this P°Pelationulation is data availab• along this route. OAS were desired
200 of the Pop come census life need resources ply if turn
w Hsu{ficientR
{Mete is no to otutities for access. ,nsit center. is currently g
howe
ere are significant 9V outes at the Tua ver there t poones FertY
dditiot ns emP ihisronic- ttansitiacilities, Ln Kaeletn•a UpFc
with access to a 10ee PoPulation along along this road to support ~aw"d
(:ardinal Ln•
i{iCari uioiaPkwy low
•fhae is a sign m.sttucttue is generally in Place d naix. Qenita Rd.• saa
and> hiudsidewall~s• Sandburg.TechCerter.t
d Nunzixer.Vasns.firL4•
be P~ dart easenients~
or72 iceedsMatrix.doc
~ntt NC
••lncludes 1w^ness~ ~dm
t1\lulia\Tri-~d'Sri-Met Scrv
_rass\LItP
Place Comments
S'`~~ Rxistinglnfrastructurein sidewalkacc~s
GAY
Sidewalk alongroute
Access to Access at
e 1Vlet for l,ighbng Bxisting potential
Ujac on Needs reds to h
'Po ife N RD~r area sufficient Transit stops
Targeted p L
tuxn outs & Routed coold
Ethnic piversity transPmenit'es services Shelters
be in
etc.) Generally no
Geographic social " b enches, m
Priority o o a o c (shelters, cations Yes Yes sidewalks frocasetnenis
cter a S w 0 o " mile west of
Locatio Needed n oService Chara c 0.0 x a Vo
u u s a 0 W Y estNO 99W gull Mm Yes 99w to Roshak p¢rs could
Rd vast and S en
W No is
j Q 258 5625 outs westbound No Ye Sh could
Yes be in
4922 59 38b psPo Ridge Dr' Yes
No tum casem~t d
lters od
Total East and No She I
-Bull Population outs Tee unw4DVc yes 130th be in
Yes side SLenchview easemots
N0 tom East and 130 d
mountayn outs westboun Yes to Peachu~ Shelters caul
d be in
'Roma 140 turn Bench Ceew Yes eascm ~
between uwlncome outs We abound NO U9 RosbndRDr
eeDnve Yes ROShak , 1~'~ Upla
~tc
49W and N0 ~m p¢achtrund
N Yes to Barrows notbwt
garraws out EastbO Yes o sidewalks>b° forbusUr is 13 ds 5 418 Roshak s . east otb~ sides uotb,1t for
o r. 1 plands
~a 401 11 ly U
& westbound yes rc _ bus 15
Seniors N0 Uplands'Ilr
lands Dr. @ yes notbu t f r
s
Yes bu
011
N0 S alp estbound 130
east & yes
14 110 lob 1648 Nn turn dal owsRd@
1418 outs
Yottt 9
ago
b~~ly\iulia\Tci•mat\Tti~Met Service Needs Matrixd°c
__..,ca\DEPTS\
SUMMARY
Total residential population along this route is 5625.
12% of this population is a race other than white alone, thus funds targeting minority populations may be helpful
29% of the population is under the age of 19 whereas only 7% is over age 65.
There is no low income census data available to date.
There are few, if any, life need resources along this route. Access to existing transit routes providing education, employment, food, health and social programs could be attained by providing access to existing transit along
Highway 99.
Sidewalk access and infra-structure is generally in place along this road to support transit facilities, however there is currently insufficient ROW if tum-outs were desired at key intersections. Benches or shelters couldbe
placed in casements behind sidewalks. Several portions (Roshak Rd and Uplands ) are not built for bus traffic.
\\TIG333\USR\DF,PTS\LRPLNVulia\Tri-met\Tri-Met Service Needs Matrix.doc
3-1-02
10
Tigard Transit Service Needs - Draft Prioritization
* Meets Council target (2 points)
® Partially meets Council target (1 points)
O Does not meet Council target (0 point)
Population Life Needs Other
Dot
O O O R. a n7 O k
E° v~ a w~~ w° ~n° w° w a wo
Bonita - Hall ® 4N ® O O O O ® 0 0 I
to 72nd
Durham - 99 0 O ® ® co Q 0 0 16
to Hall
Durham - Hall O ® a O ® ® O 0 0 O 0 10
to Tualatin TC
McDonald - 0 O ® O O O O ® 0 ® 9
99 to Hall
Gaarde - 99 0 ® O O O O 40 0 ® 12
to Barrows
72" - 99 to 0 ® O ® + ® 0 3 O 0 13
Hampton
72" - O ® O ® O ® 13
Hunziker to
Tualatin TC
Bull Mountain ® co ® O O O O 05 O ® 6
-99 to
Barrows
(Key located on page 2)
KEY
® O
Total population >3000 1001-3000 1000 or fewer
Minority > 15% 11-15% 10% or less
Youth >30% 21-30% 20% or less
Senior >10% 6-10% 5% or less
Low Income
Employment support & More than 5 businesses 1 to 5 businesses No businesses serving
education serving this need along serving this need along this need along route
route route
Food and health More than 5 businesses 1 to 5 businesses No businesses serving
serving this need along serving this need along this need along route
route route
Social programs More than 5 businesses 1 to 5 businesses No businesses serving
serving this need along serving this need along this need along route
route route
Employee population More than 1000 1-1000 employees No employees
(based on business tax employees
data
Existing infrastructure in Significant infra-structure Some infra-structure Very little existing infra-
place° (sidewalks, lighting, investment needed to structure in place,
ROW or easements for support transit. significant investment
amenities) in place to needed to support
support transit with little transit and/or it would
additional improvement. be difficult to provide
infra-structure due to
ROW issues
Route identified in TSP Yes No or existing
Existing transit Existing transit service Access to at least 1 No access to transit
opportunities on route, access to more transit route that that carries traffic into
than one existing transit provides service into Tigard
route if transit were Tigard6
provided along this route
1 Employment support & education businesses included Daycare centers, employment/temp agencies,
schools, and labor unions.
2 Food and health businesses included Medical/Dental offices, eating and drinking establishments,
grocery/convenience stores, physical fitness businesses, and massage therapy/acupuncture.
3 Social programs businesses included counseling services, Non-profit relief and aid organizations, and
Senior, disabled and veteran services.
4 In most cases there is insufficient ROW for bus turn-outs at key intersections, however, this is not reflected
in the measurement because Tri-met has indicated that they are re-looking at the provision for turn-outs and
are likely going to be going away from this design.
5 Bull Mountain has sidewalk access to key transit stops, however, because several portions of the identified
route are unable to accommodate bus traffic, it only received a partial rating.
6 i.e., making several stops and route changes within Tigard to pick up and distribute Tigard traffic in Tigard,
serving internal transit needs
AGENDA ITEM
FOR AGENDA OF March 19, 2002
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Street Maintenance Fee Stud R ort
PREPARED BY: A.P. 115uenas DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Presentation of the Street Maintenance Fee Study findings and other information to City Council for discusion and
direction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council provide direction to the Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force to
establish dialogue with citizens and businesses regarding the findings of the Study Report and to bring the matter
back to Council sometime in July 2002 for further discussion and decision.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
City Council, through Resolution No. 01-06, formed a Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force to
evaluate and recommend to Council feasible alternative funding sources for street maintenance and street
expansion needs. The Task Force has evaluated, and will continue to examine, a wide variety of funding sources
for both corrective and preventative maintenance of City streets, and expansion of major collectors to
accommodate current and future traffic. One funding source that appears feasible and could potentially be a
funding source for future street maintenance is a transportation user fee (also called a Street Utility Fee or Street
Maintenance Fee).
At the City Council meeting on August 28, 2001, the Task Force made its initial report to City Council. The
Task Force recommended initiation of a Street Maintenance Fee study to be brought back to Council for
discussion and consideration. Council authorized the study and directed the preparation of a report to be
submitted to Council for further discussion. At its meeting on February 21, 2002, the Task Force reviewed the
draft Street Maintenance Fee Study Report and approved it with modifications for submittal to City Council.
Attached is the Street Maintenance Fee Study Report. The report finds the Street Maintenance Fee to be a
feasible source of funds for maintenance of the street network, limited maintenance of rights-of-way, sidewalks,
and the streetlight and traffic signal systems. The fees based on trip generation rates are relatively low for single
family and multi-family dwellings. Fees for various businesses are higher, but are commensurate with the
number of trips generated by those businesses.
Interest has been expressed in the City assuming maintenance responsibility for rights-of-way and sidewalk
maintenance on all streets Citywide. The Study Report does not include that scenario, but attached for
information and comparison is a summary of the fees that would be required to expand the scope to perform
that maintenance on a Citywide basis.
c
In addition, there was a letter from former City Councilor Paul Hunt opposing the Street Maintenance Fee. Also
attached is a memorandum responding to the issues Mr. Hunt brought up in his letter.
The Task Force will present the results of the study to City Council for discussion and direction. The Task
Force recommends the implementation of the Street Maintenance Fee incorporating the four maintenance
elements of street maintenance, ROW maintenance, sidewalk maintenance, and street light energy consumption
and maintenance as reported in the Study Report. However, the Task Force proposes to establish dialogue with
businesses that would be most affected by the fee before bringing back the fee for further discussion and
possible implementation.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None. The report to Council was directed by Council at the time the study was authorized.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Timely maintenance of the street infrastructure meets the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow goal oflmprove Trafflc Safety.
The implementation of the Street Maintenance Fee meets the goal of Identijy and Develop Funding Resources.
ATTACHMENT LIST
1. Street Maintenance Fee Study Report with the following Appendices:
• Appendix A-1 - City of Tigard Street Maintenance Needs
• Appendix A-2 - Long-Term Program for Annual Street Maintenance
• Appendix B-1 - Street Maintenance Element
® Appendix B-2 - ROW Maintenance Element
• Appendix B-3 - Sidewalk Maintenance Element
• Appendix B-4 - Street Light Maintenance Element
• Appendix C - Summary of Rates
2. Summary of Fees with Citywide Maintenance of ROW and Sidewalks
3. Letter from Paul Hunt to City Council received March 7, 2002
4. Memorandum to City Council responding to Mr. Hunt's letter
FISCAL NOTES
None at this point. The implementation of the Street Maintenance Fee would provide funding for street
maintenance, limited ROW maintenance, limited sidewalk maintenance, and street light and traffic signal system .
energy costs and maintenance.
1:\Citywide\Sum\Revised Agenda Item-Street Maintenance Fee Study Report.doc
Street Maintenance Fee Study Report
March 5, 2002
Background
City Council, through Resolution No. 01-06, formed a Transportation Financing Strategies Task
Force to evaluate and recommend to Council feasible alternative funding sources for street
maintenance and street expansion needs. The Task Force has evaluated, and will continue to
examine, a wide variety of funding sources for both corrective and preventative maintenance of
City streets, and expansion of major collectors to accommodate current and future traffic. One
funding source that appears feasible and could potentially be a funding source for future street
maintenance is a transportation user fee (also called a Street Utility Fee or Street Maintenance
Fee).
At the City Council meeting on August 28, 2001, the Task Force made its initial report to City
Council. The Task Force recommended initiation of a Street Maintenance Fee study to be
brought back to Council for discussion and consideration.
The Need for Timely Maintenance
Much of the street infrastructure in the City is old and was not designed for heavy trucks and
buses, which accelerate deterioration and greatly increase maintenance requirements. Pavement
condition is typically quantified by the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) which rates the
pavement according to the extent and severity of distress types present (cracking, rutting,
shoving, etc.). Studies have shown that pavement condition worsens at an increasing rate as the
pavement gets older. The reason for this is that deterioration begins mostly at the surface, then
progresses down into the underlying layers as surface cracks develop. A typical pavement
without rehabilitation will experience a 40% drop in PCI during the first 75% of its life and an
additional 40% drop during the following 12% of its life. Restoration of pavement near the end
of its service life will typically cost 4 to 5 times more than the rejuvenation performed in a timely
manner.
The City's Pavement Management System reports a preventative and corrective pavement
maintenance backlog of approximately $2 million dollars (Appendix A-1). About half of this
amount is for slurry seals while the remainder is for pavement overlays. Because the street
ratings were performed in 1999, these streets have further deteriorated since then and would
require reassessment within the next year or two. Some of the pavement overlays required are on
major streets (such as Gaarde Street), which are already scheduled for reconstruction and
widening as part of a major street expansion project. However, the streets that require overlays
and slurry seals, but are not programmed as part of a major expansion project, would need to be
addressed as part of a long-term program of corrective and preventative pavement maintenance.
Because the maintenance backlog cannot be reduced quickly without a large infusion of funding,
some of the streets now requiring slung seals would probably require pavement overlay instead
by the time the work is actually performed to bring pavement conditions back to acceptable
standards.
Street Maintenance Fee Study Report
Page i of 8
The State Gas Tax Dilemma
As operating costs rise each year, the amount available from the State Gas Tax (which has not
been increased in over a decade) for corrective and preventative maintenance has drastically
decreased. In FY 2001-02, the amount available for the Street System Program from that tax is
$207,000. This is a dramatic drop from the $500,000 to $600,000 available just a few years ago.
Within a year or two, the State Gas Tax would cease to be a viable source of funding for
pavement overlays and slurry seals.
Other City Street-related Maintenance Needs
The City does have street-related maintenance requirements, other than direct maintenance of the
pavement and shoulders in a typical City street. These requirements are:
• Rights-of-Way Maintenance - This is the maintenance of rights-of way typically behind the
sidewalk on collector streets where direct access from the individual lots is not allowed. A
good example is Durham Road between Hall Boulevard and Highway 99W. The
subdivisions adjacent to the road have internal streets for circulation and with limited access
points to Durham Road. The homes typically face away from the street and in most cases
have a wall built between the homes and Durham Road. The public right-of-way between the
sidewalk and the wall has long been a maintenance problem that under current City code is
the responsibility of the homeowner on the other side of the wall. However, these
homeowners have double frontage and do not have direct access to the strips adjacent to
Durham Road. The City has considered assuming responsibility for these strips, but the lack
of funding in the State Gas Tax has not allowed inclusion of this work in the budget.
However, this issue continues to arise each year during the budget formulation process.
• Sidewalk Maintenance - This is maintenance and repair of sidewalks on the collector
system only. It would involve replacement of sidewalk panels that pose a tripping hazard and
routine maintenance of the sidewalks on an annual basis.
• Street Light and Signal System Energy Consumption and Maintenance - The energy and
maintenance charges for both the streetlights and the traffic signal systems are funded out of
the State Gas Tax funds. Substitution of other funding sources to pay for these costs would
free gas tax fiends for other street-related purposes, including potentially the issuance of
revenue bonds for the construction of major street improvements.
The Street Maintenance Fee
The Street Maintenance Fee is an alternative source of funds that can be implemented to help
protect the City's investment in the street infrastructure. This is a monthly fee based on use of the
transportation system, and is typically based on trip generation rates. The fee is charged to each
household and business in the City. Other cities in Oregon have successfully implemented this
fee and are using the proceeds in their annual street maintenance programs.
Street Maintenance Fee Study Report
Page 2 of 8
Legal Authority for Establishment
Chapter 3, Section 3.32.020 grants City Council the authority to establish, by resolution, fees and
charges reasonably related to the City's cost of service. Hence, City Council has the authority to
establish the Street Maintenance Fee and can initiate that fee by Council action. However, the
initiative process does provide a mechanism for the public to challenge any Council action by
referring that action to a vote. The Street Maintenance Fee could be subject to that initiative
process.
Maintenance Elements Included in the Study
The following are the maintenance elements included in the study together with the target
amounts to be funded through the Street Maintenance Fee:
• Street Maintenance - $800,000. This amount assumes that most of the funding would be used
annually for street maintenance purposes with a small reserve set aside for future
reconstruction of certain streets as that reconstruction becomes necessary.
• Rights-of-Way Maintenance - $270,000
• Sidewalk Maintenance - $90,000
• Street Light and Traffic Signal System Maintenance -$445,000
• Total for all four maintenance elements: $1,605,000
Scope of Work for Each Element
• Street Maintenance - Preventative and Corrective Maintenance of all City streets. This
includes pothole patching, crack sealing, digouts, pavement overlays, slurry seals,
maintenance of street storm drainage facilities, and reconstruction of the street structural
section. Attached as Appendix A-2 is a long-term program for annual maintenance of the
City streets applying pavement overlays, thin-lift overlays, and slurry seals combined with
street reconstruction as needed. This program addresses arterials, collectors, neighborhood
routes, and local streets as four separate categories all requiring appropriate levels of
maintenance. The arterial and collector streets handle higher volumes of traffic and typically
require more attention. The neighborhood routes and local streets handle lesser volumes and
would be expected to deteriorate at a slower rate. The revenue to be derived from the Street
Maintenance Fee would be directed to implementation of the long-term maintenance
program, and to the routine maintenance work performed by the City's street crews.
• Rights-of-Way Maintenance - Maintenance of rights-of-way between the sidewalk and the
right-of-way line on collector streets with limited direct access from adjacent subdivisions.
• Sidewalk Maintenance - Maintenance of sidewalk on collector streets Citywide.
Street Maintenance Fee Study Report
Page 3 of 8
e Street Light and Signal System Maintenance - Maintenance and power consumption of all
streetlights Citywide. Maintenance and power consumption on all traffic signal systems and
crosswalk lighting systems under City jurisdiction.
Methodology for Establishing User Fees
The methodology for establishing user fees for each element of work is as follow:
Data Collection
The first step in the study was to establish an inventory of all of the existing uses on occupied
parcels in the City. Basic uses include single-family detached residential, multi-family
residential and non-residential. The single-family detached and multi-family dwelling unit
inventories were obtained from utility billing data collected by the City's Finance Department.
The data collection for the non-residential group was more difficult and involved the use of
digitized aerial photos and site inspections. For example, where office buildings were noted, the
overall footprint could easily be digitized from the aerial photo, but a site visit was necessary to
determine the number of floors involved. This data may need to be fine-tuned prior to fee
implementation.
Trip Generation
The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual, Sixth Edition, was used
to determine trip generation values for each use. The ITE manual is the most commonly used
and accepted manual for this purpose and can be consistently applied to each use. ITE trip
generation values were used in the development of the Traffic Impact Fee by Washington
County and have been used by various cities in the development of street maintenance fees. The
City of Tualatin used the fourth generation ITE manual when they developed their street utility
fee.
The trip generation values are assigned in accordance with certain variables, such as gross square
footage of building, number of dwelling units (DU), number of acres (AC), etc. For the non-
residential uses, the most commonly used factor is "number of trips per thousand gross square
feet of building per day", or "trips/KSF/day". Unfortunately, not all uses have trip generation
factors given in terms of "trips/KSF/day". For instance, Congregate Care Facilities are spoken to
in terms of "trips/DU/day" because for that use, the number of dwelling units is the most
significant. Another example is Gasoline/Service Station, which is spoken to in terms of
"trips/VFP/day", where "VFP" is the number of vehicular fueling positions. Therefor( it is not
the size of any building associated with the gas station that determines the number of ti )s, but
rather it is the number of vehicles the station can serve at any one time.
Group Selection
Once the trip generation values were determined for each use, the table was sorted in increasing
order of the number of trips per unit. The non-residential uses were divided into subgroups
based on number of trips, similar to how the City of Tualatin (and other jurisdictions) groups
them. Five non-residential subgroups were established as follows:
Street Maintenance Fee Study Report
Page 4 of 8
• Group 1 0 to 20 trips per unit
• Group 2 21 to 100 trips per unit
• Group 3 101 to 400 trips per unit
• Group 4 Greater than 400 trips per unit
• Group 5 Special group for parks, cemeteries and golf courses.
The concept behind forming subgroups is to help generate a maintenance fee rate that would be
applied to each group, rather than having to develop a separate rate for all 52 land use categories
included in the ITE Manual. Therefore, seven different rates are established for the two
residential categories and the five non-residential groups.
Rate Calculation
In order to develop fair rates for each group, it was important to first analyze the impact of each
group with respect to their number of trips. Hence, the total theoretical number of trips per year
for each group and a grand total of trips for all uses were calculated. The proportion of trips that
each group contributes to the total annual trips, by percentage, is shown. The guiding premise is
that each group should pay an amount proportionate to the trip impact contributed by that group.
Therefore, if a group contributes 3% of the annual trips, then their annual maintenance fee
amount should be approximately 3% of the total revenue required.
Calculated Fees
Attached are the spreadsheets (listed as Appendices B-1 through B-4) showing the groups and
the amounts that each group should pay for each maintenance element. The groups and amounts
are summarized in the following tables:
Table 1
Summary of Fees by Maintenance Element
Maintenance Land Use Category Rate/Month
Element per Unit
Street Maintenance
Single Family (Detached) $ 1.0574
Multi-Family $ 0.7325
Non-residential Group 1 0-20 trips/unit/day) $ 0.8651
Non-residential Group 2 21-100 trips/unit/day) $ 4.9692
Non-residential Group 3 101-400 trips/unit/day) $16.1521
Non-residential Group 4 401+ trips/unit/day) $62.0920
Non-residential Group 5 (Special category) $ 0.2986
ROW Maintenance
Single Family Detached $ 0.3569
Multi-Family $ 0.2472
Non-residential Group 1 0-20 trips/unit/day) $ 0.2920
Street Maintenance Fee Study Report
Page 5 of 8
Non-residential Group 2 21-100 trips/unit/day) $ 1.6771
Non-residential Group 3 101-400 trips/unit/day) $ 5.4513
Non-residential Group 4 401+ trips/unit/day) $20.9560
Non-residential Group 5 (Special cate o $ 0.1008
Sidewalk
Maintenance
Single Family Detached $ 0.1190
Multi-Family $ 0.0824
Non-residential Group 1 0-20 trips/unit/day) $ 0.0973
Non-residential Group 2 21-100 trips/unit/day) $ 0.5590
Non-residential Group 3 101-400 trips/unit/day) $ 1.8171
Non-residential Group 4 401+ trips/unit/day) $ 6.9853
Non-residential Group 5 (Special category) $ 0.0336
Street Light and
Signal System
Maintenance
Single Family (Detached) $ 0.5882
Multi-Family $ 0.4075
Non-residential Group 1 0-20 trips/unit/day) $ 0.4812
Non-residential Group 2 21-100 trips/unit/day) $ 2.7641
Non-residential Group 3 101-400 trips/unit/day) $ 8.9846
Non-residential Group 4 401+ trips/unit/day) $34.5386
Non-residential Group 5 (Special category) $ 0.1661
Table 2
Summary of Fees for All Maintenance Elements
Land Use Street ROW Sidewalk Street Light Total
Category Maint. Maint. Maint. and Signal
System
Maint.
Single $ 1.0574 $ 0.3569 $ 0.1190 $ 0.5882 $2.1214
Family
Multi- $ 0.7325 $ 0.2472 $ 0.0824 $ 0.4075 $1.4697
Family
Group 1 $ 0.8651 $ 0.2920 $ 0.0973 $ 0.4812 $1.7356
Group 2 $ 4.9692 $ 1.6771 $ 0.5590 $ 2.7641 $9.9694
Group 3 $16.1521 $ 5.4513 $ 1.8171 $ 8.9846 $32.4052
Group 4 $62.0920 $20.9560 $ 6.9853 $34.5386 $124.5720
Group 5 $ 0.2986 $ 0.1008 $ 0.0336 $ 0.1661 $0.5991
Street Maintenance Fee Study Report
Page 6 of 8
Table 2 indicates that Group 4 is subject to the highest fees. Fees for the single family and multi-
family groups are relatively low per month. Consideration could be given to increasing those
fees to lessen the burden on the groups that would end up paying the most based on the analysis.
Appendix C shows the summary of fees for all maintenance elements in greater detail.
Timing for Implementation
The Street Maintenance Fee is probably best established prior to the beginning of a fiscal year so
that it could be included in the budget process. However, because of the need to establish an
alternative to the State Gas Tax, creation of the Street Maintenance Fee should be given a high
priority and could be established anytime during the fiscal year.
Public Process
The public process for adoption of the Street Maintenance should at least include meetings with
those property owners that are expected to pay the highest amounts. Those property owners can
be readily identified and meetings should be set to discuss the proposed fees with them. The
single family and multi-family groups individually pay relatively low monthly rates. Those rates
are $2.00 to $3.06 at the worst case for single family dwellings and $1.50 to $2.25 each for
multi-family dwelling units. These are well within the range charged by other cities. Those fees
range from $1.42 for single family dwelling units in Tualatin to $5.12 for the same units in
Ashland. A $3.00 fee in Tigard would fall midway between those two extremes and should not
create opposition among single family and multi-family residents, asstuning an effective
information campaign is undertaken to explain the reasons for initiation of the fees. It is
extremely important for that information campaign to be developed and implemented prior to
adoption of the Street Maintenance Fee.
Conclusion
The Street Maintenance Fee appears to be a feasible source of funds for maintenance of the street
network, including the street structural section, rights-of-way and sidewalks on collectors, and
the street light and traffic signal systems. The fees based on trip generation rates are relatively
low for single family and multi-family dwellings. Fees for various businesses are higher, but are
commensurate with the number of trips generated by those businesses.
Recommendation
This study recommends the implementation of the Street Maintenance Fee incorporating the four
maintenance elements of street maintenance, ROW maintenance, sidewalk maintenance, and
street light energy consumption and maintenance. The State Gas Tax is no longer a viable source
of funds for anything beyond routine maintenance involving pothole patching and crack sealing.
Pavement overlays and reconstruction must be funded through other means. The Street
Maintenance Fee is a potential funding source that has been successfully implemented in other
jurisdictions and could easily be justified for speedy implementation. The Street Maintenance
Fee should be established as soon as possible so that the maintenance backlog on the City streets
could be addressed in a comprehensive and effective manner.
Street Maintenance Fee Study Report
Page 7 of 8
- 11
The amounts for each of the maintenance elements are adequate as of calendar year 2002. These
amounts should be reviewed periodically and compared with the actual revenues -received and
against the rate of inflation and increases in costs. Hence, the Street Maintenance Fee should be
reviewed at least three years after implementation and every three to five years after that.
Decisions can be made at those reviews on the need, if any, to increase the fees to attain expected
revenues, or to keep pace with the effects of inflation.
Appendices
Appendix A-1 - City of Tigard Street Maintenance Needs
Appendix A-2 - Long-Terra Program for Annual Street Maintenance
Appendix B-1- Street Maintenance Element
Appendix B-2 - ROW Maintenance Element
Appendix B-3 - Sidewalk Maintenance Element
Appendix B-4 - Street Light Maintenance Element
Appendix C - Summary of Rates
I:\Eng\Gus\Street Maintenance Fee\Final Street Maintenance Fee Study Report.doc
Street Maintenance Fee Study Report
Page 8 of 8
City of Tigard
Street Maintenance Needs
Maintenance. Category Total Cost
Street Reconstruction $590,000
Pavement Overlay $470,000
Slur Seals $1,010,000
Total Costs $89070,000
Appendix A-1
Long-Term Program for Annual Street Maintenance
Database
The street list for this long-term program was obtained from a database consisting of all the streets in the City of
Tigard. The database was created in 1999 by CHEC Consultants. CHEC inspected each street in the City and assigned
ratings based on pavement surface conditions. The Pavement Management Software provided by CHEC Consultants
accesses the database and provides recommendations for preventative and corrective maintenance on those streets.
A street is typically divided into segments with similar cross-sections. Changes in the street cross-sections would result
in different segments within the same street throughout its entire length. The most common rating used is the Pavement
Condition Index (PCI), which assigns a rating from 0 to 100 for each street segment. The higher the number the better
the condition of the street. Thus, a newly resurfaced street will have a PCI rating of 100. Although this raring is only
one of the factors that are used in determining condition of the street, it is used (for purposes of the study) to provide
the basis for a long-term program of preventative and corrective maintenance.
Classifications
The streets are classified into four categories: arterial, collectors, neighborhood routes and local streets. To determine
the future conditions of the streets, the following deterioration rates are used: Arterials and Collectors = 2 PCI/year ,
Neighborhood Routes and Local Streets = 1 PCI/yr. The base year for the PCI rating is 1999.
Street Area
The cost of resurfacing is based on the surface area of the street. The surface area of the street is determined by the
product of the street project length and the average width of the street.
Maintenance Options
The four maintenance options being considered in rehabilitating the streets are: Slurry Seal, Thin Overlay, Overlay and
Reconstruction.
The determination of maintenance option for each street depends on the updated PCI rating of the street and is shown
as follows:
• PCI < 20 requires Reconstruction
• 20 < PCI<59 requires Overlay
• PCI>59 on arterials and collectors requires Thin Overlay
• PCI>59 requires Slurry Seal if the Street is categorized as Local.
Pavement Life Cycle
The following is the life expectancy for each of the four maintenance options:
• Reconstruction = 20 years
• Overlay = 15 to 18 years
• Thin Overlay = 12 to 15 years
• Slurry Seal = 8 to 12 years
Estimate Assumptions
• $800,000 will be available yearly for the street maintenance.
• Annual inflation rate of 3% is applied to unit cost.
• The unit costs for the year 2003 are as follows:
• Overlay=$1.25/s.f. Thin Overlay = $0.60/s.f., Slurry =$0.2/s.f.
• Reconstruction in year 2011=$6.00/s.f.
APPENDIX A-2
Cover Page 1
NEWS
Maintenance Schedule
With a proposed annual amount of $800,000 for street maintenance, the objective is to rehabilitate the entire city street
inventory in the shortest possible time frame. A strategic plan of careful expenditure and savings enables the entire city
street inventory to be rehabilitated in 16 years (from FY 2003-04 to FY2019-20). Approximately $700,000 out of
$800,000 is spent annually to maintain streets. Approximately $100,000 is reserved every year. The cumulative reserve
amount would be used in future fiscal years for the reconstruction of severely damaged streets as part of the long-term
plan.
By FY 2019-20, each street in the entire street inventory would have received some type of maintenance treatment at
least once. Due to the life expectancy of the pavements, previously overlaid streets would be revisited by FY 2018-19,
thin overlay by FY 2015-16 and slurry seal by FY 2014-15 to determine the need for maintenance at that point. The
entire maintenance cycle would begin again in FY 2020-21.
APPENDIX A-2
Cover Page 2
Proposed Makr MalnteruncV Budget Forecast
Fy 2003.2D04
Road Name Limits From To Clnsllkston 1999 PCI 2003 PCI Recommend Action PrLlengtlt Width Area (s.(.) Cost
72 NO VARNS ST HUNEWER ST Art 53 45 Dwdy 475 40 19000 $23,750.00
DURHAM SUMMERCIE DR 113 TH AV Medal 55 48 Ondy 470 40 18600 $23,500.00
72 NO PINE ST OAK ST Arterial 67 59 Thin Ovely 420 40 16800 $10,080.00
72 ND BAYLOR ST SAYLOR ST Arterial 73 65 Thin O'dey 1190 40 47600 $28,560.00
121 ST SUMMERCRE DR SUMMER ST Collector 47 39 Overlay 320 35 11200 $14,000.00
121 ST SUMMER ST BURLHEIOH DR Collector 58 50 Overy 275 35 9625 $12,031.25
121 ST CHANDLER DR GAARDE ST CollMOr 100 92 Thin Carley 410 33 14350 $17,937.50
BONITA FANNO CRE OR RR CROSS[ Collector 62 54 Ovedy 390 35, 13650 $17,062.50
SCOFFINS ASH AV MAIN ST Collector 46 38 Grady 425 35 14875 $18,593.75
CASCADE SCROLLS F RD SCHOLLS F RD Collector 100 92 Thin Owdy 581 35 20335 $25,418.75
PFAFFLE 02 ND AV 81 ST AV Collector 95 87 Thin 0"11y 280 35 9800 $12.250.00
NORTH DAKOTA 121 ST AV 119 TH AV Neigh'd Route 28 24 Onriy 520 30 15500 $19.500. GO
79 TH CHURCHILL WY THURSTON DR N.Igh'd Route 53 49 Onriy 1080 30 32400 540,500.0
79 TH BOND ST CHURCHILLWY tash'd Route 37 33 Overt' 115 30 3450 $4,312.80
79 TH GENTLEWOO DR MARA CT Neih'd Route 47 43 Owday 1490 30 44700 $55,875.00
ROSS HALL BL 81 ST AV N.igh'd Route 47 43 Granary 950 30 28500 $35,625.00
NORTH DAKOTA GREENBURG RD 95 TH AV Neigh'd Route 52 48 Owdry 240 30 7200 $9.000. GO
NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE RD TIEDEMAN AV Neigh'd Route 82 78 Thin Owrty 1340 30 40200 550.250.00
SHADY GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RE N.igh'd Route 68 64 Thin Onrty 1000 30 30000 $37,500.00
92 NO PARKING L PARKING L NsighA Route 63 59 Thin Overly 335 30 10050 $12,562.50 $468.309
132 NO 133 RD AV 133 RD AV Local 24 20 Overlay 925 25 23125 528,906.25
112 TH ERROL ST WALNUT ST Local 26 22 Oreriy 500 25 12500 $15,625.00
66 TH HAMPTON ST HAMPTON ST Local 30 26 Overly 510 25 12750 $15.937.50
67 TH CLINTON ST END Local 48 44 Owdy 845 25 21125 $26,406.25
THORN/81ST CUL•DE•SA THORN ST Local 47 43 Overly 106 25 2650 $3,312.50
66TH HAMPTON ST FRANKLIN ST Local 55 51 Cwday 620 25 15500 $19,375.00 $109.563
Sub Total $577.871.25
Engineering 6 Admine10%. $57,787.13
Overlay Cost•$1.25/s.l. Thin Owny CosteSO.6/11 Total
Accumulated Reserve Total $164,341.63
FY 2004.2003
Road Name Limits From To ClassiRcaton 1999 PCI 2004 PCI Recommend Action PrL).rdth LVldth Area (s.l.) Cost
GREENBURG LINCOLN AV 98 TH AV Merial 84 74 Thin Overlay 2150 40 86000 $53.148.00
GREENBURG CENTER ST LINCOLN AV Medal Be 78 Thin Overlay goo 40 32000 $19.776.00 .
GREENBURG PACIFIC HW CENTER ST Arterial 54 440.11 211 40 8440 $11,528.27
72 NO OAK ST VENTURA OR Merial 80 70 Thin Ovely 1087 40 43480 $26,870.64
DURHAM 92 NO AV FULL BL Art erial 80 70 Th ln Overly 1799 40 71960 $44.471.28
DURHAM SERENA CT 92 NO AV Arterial 80 70 Thin Overlay 2020 40 80800 $49,934.40
DURHAM 74 TH AV SOONESFER RD Merial 75 65 Thin Overly 450 40 18000 $11,124.00
DURHAM 113 TH AV SERENA CT Merial 80 70 Thin Overlay 2510 40 100400 $62,047.20
BURNHAM ASH AV ASH AV Collector 36 Z6 Ovady 760 35 26600 $34,247.50
BURNHAM HALL OL ASH AV Cc actor 35 25 Overlay 1205 35 42175 $54.300.31
TIEDEMAN WALNUT ST CITY LIMI Collector 31 21 O-ley 210 35 7350 $9.463.13
TIEDEMAN CITY LIMI CITY IIMI Collector 42 32 Overlay 290 35 10150 $13,068.13
121 ST BURLHEIGH DR NORTH DAK ST Collector 100 90 Thin Overlay 245 35 8575 55,299.35
SCOFFINS HALL BL ASH AV Collector so 70 Thin Ovely 470 35 16450 $10,166.10
VENTURA VENTURA DR BARBARA LN Neigh'd Route 65 60 Thin Grade' 890 30 26700 516,500.40
130 TH CUL•DE•SA MORNINGST DF Neigh'd Route 66 61 Thin Overly 610 30 18300 $11,309.40
SUMMERFIELD DURHAM RD 114 TH CT Nalgh'd Rout. 72 67 T' 1. Overlay 1000 30 30000 $18,540.00
78TH PFAFFLE ST SPRUCE ST Neigh'd Route 75 70 Thin Onday 280 30 8400 $5.191.20
COMMERCIAL 95 TH AV 98 TH AV Neigh'd Route 80 75 Thn Overlay 250 30 7500 $4,635.00
LOCUST GREENBURG RD 92 NO AV Neigh'd Route 82 77 Thln Orly 1070 30 32100 $19,837.60
MURDOCK 98TH AV 97 YH AV Neigh'd Route 92 77 Thin Overlay 300 30 9000 $5,562.00
BENCHVIEW ALPINE VI CT BRIM PL Neigh'd Route B2 77 Thin Overlay 2495 30 74850 $46,257.30 $533.278
GARDEN f1ARDEN PL GARDEN PL Local 58 53 Overly 850 25 21250 $27,359.38
69TH DARTMOUTH ST CLINTON ST Local 52 47 Overlay 305 25 7625 $9,817.19
SANDBURG 72 NO AV CUL•DE-SA Local 53 480.11 935 25 23375 $30,095.31
113TH END END Local 53 48 Overlay 730 25 18250 $23,496.88
ASH COMMERCIA ST SCOFFINS ST Local 55 50 Overlay 415 25 10375 $13,357.81 $104,127
Sub Total $637,404.16
Engineering 6 Admin.10%. $63,740.42
Overlay Cost-$1.2875/s.l.. Thin Overlay-$0.618/s.l. Total
Accumulated Reserve Total $263.197.04
FY 2005.2006
Road Name Limits From To Classiftwon 1999 PCI 2005 PCI Recommend Action PrLlength Width Area (11) Cost
72 NO FIR ST YARNS ST Arterial so 68 Thin Overlay 360 40 14400 $9,166.18
72 ND SAYLOR ST VILLA RID WY Arterial 82 70 Thin O"riry 150 40 6000 $3,819.24
260 40 30400 $6,620.02
day
WALNUT BARROWS(RD SHOPPING Arterial 82 70 Thin.
WALNUT SHOPPING NORTHVIEW DR Merial 82 70 Th in Overlay 230 40 9200 $5,856.17
WALNUT NORTHVIEW DR 135 TH AV Art erial 84 72 Thn Overay 1610 40 64400 $10,993.18
WALNUT 135 TH AV 132 NO AV Arterial 90 78 Thin Overlay 1475 40 59000 $37,555.96
WALNUT 132 NO AV 128 TH AV Arterial 90 78 Thin Overly 950 40 38000 $24,188.52
PFAFFLE 83 RD AV 82 ND AV Collector 82 70 Thin Overlay 220 35 7700 54,901.36
68 TH 66 TH AV HAMPTON ST Collector 84 72 Thin 0-lry 895 35 31325 $19,939.62
68 TH HAMPTON ST 66 TH AV Collector 84 72 Thin Overlay 895 35 31325 $19,939.62
BONITA RR CROSSI 72 NO AV Collector 84 72 Thin Ovarly 920 35 28700 $18,268.70
MAIN PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Collector 84 72 Thin Overly 285 35 9975 $6,349.49
121 ST MERESTONE CT SUMMERCRE 01 Collector 84 72 Thin Overlay 300 35 10500 $6,683.67
WALNUT ASCENSION DR END Collector 82 70 Thin Overlay 210 35 7350 $4,678.57
OAK GREENBURG RD 95 TH AV Collector 84 72 Thin Ownry 1085 35 37975 $24,172.61
CASCADE GREENBURG RD SCHOLLS F RD Collector 95 83 Thin Overly 775 35 27125 $17,266.15
CASCADE SCROLLS F RD SCROLLS F RD Collector 100 88 Thin Owdry 634 35 22190 $14,124.82
90 TH GREENBURG RD NORTH DAK ST N..gh'd Route 83 79 Thin Overlay 1610 30 48300 $30,744. B8
SPRINGWOOD COTTONWOO LN IRONWOOD LP Neigh'd Rout. 64 58 Overly 510 30 15300 520,289.71
NORTH DAKOTA GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RC Naigh'd Route 55 49 Overlay 683 30 20490 $27,172.30
98TH SATTLER ST MURDOCK ST Naigh'd Route 64 58 Overly 1100 30 33000 $43.762.13
HILLSHIRE CUL.DE-SA BLUE GUM CT Naigh'd Route 84 78 Thin Overlay 3175 30 95250 560.630.44
CANTERBURY PACIFIC HW 109 TH AV Neigh'd Route 84 78 Thin Overlay 785 30 23550 $14.990.52
98TH COMMERCIA ST LONDON CT Naigh'd Route 82 76 Thin Overlay 240 30 7200 $4,583.09
FREWING ASH AV PACIFIC HW N.igh'd Route 68 62 Thin Overlay 1430 30 42900 $27.307.57
91 ST PINEBROOK ST CUL•DE•SA Naigh'd Route 81 75 Thn Owday 420 30 12600 $8.020.40
93RD INEZ ST MCDONALD ST Neigh'd Route 95 89 Thin Overlay 1300 30 39000 $24,825.06 $526,850
NIMBUS CU4DE•SA SCHOLLS F RD Loral 55 49 Overlay 1300 25 32500 $43,099.06
FRANKLIN 68 TH AV 66 TH AV Local 56 50 Overly 520 25 13000 $17,239.63
CARMEN 121 ST AV CITY LIMI Local 57 51 Overlay 270 25 6750 $8,951.34
PINE 69 TH AV CUL•DE•SA Local 60 54 Overlay 815 25 20375 $27,019.80
85TH CITY LIMI DURHAM RD Local 62 56 Overlay 795 25 19875 $26,356.73 $122.667
Sub Total $649,51640
Engineering d Admine10%. $64,951W
Onrlay Cost-$1.326/s.l.. Thin Ovaday-$0436161 Total
Aaumulated R."-Total $348.729.01
APPENDIX A-1
Page A-2-1
►Y 2D032007
Road Name Limits From To CIaaHRcaton 1999 PCI 2006 PCI Racomm4nd Action PrOarrath VIM Aron p.l.) Coat
72 NO HAMPTON ST DARTMOUTH S7 Arlorl 100 86 Thin MAY 2000 40 60000 $52,450.90
72 ND CLINTON ST SAYLOR ST Arterl4l 100 86 Thln MAY 510 40 24400 315.997.52
72 NO DARTMOUTH ST CLINTON ST Arterial 86 72 Thin Mdey 465 40 10600 312,194.67
72 ND SPRUCE ST PINE ST Arterial 82 68 Thin MAY 360 40 14400 39,441 .16
72 ND OAK ST OAK ST Mull 9J 79 Thin OAy 321 40 12340 $6,418.77
72 ND CITY LIMI REDWOOD LN Arterial 100 86 Thn OAy 5458 40 218320 5343,178.50
72 ND REDWOOD LN BONITA RD Artedsl 100 86 Thin MAY 1973 40 78920 $51,742.81
MAIN FANNO CRE BR SCOFFINS ST Collector 82 68 Thn MAY 1795 35 62825 341.190 .34
PFAFFLE BI ST AV PACIFIC HW Collector 82 68 Thin Mdey 1130 35 39550 $25,93041
MCDONALD 9J RD AV HALL SL Collector 80 66 Thin Overlay 1630 JS 64050 $41.993.50
68 TH 36 TH AV 66 TH AV Collector 100 86 Thin MAy 630 35 22050 314,456.78
69 TH PACIFIC HW PINE ST Collector 100 86 Thin MAY 320 35 11200 $7,343.17
BON,TA HALL BL 79 TH AV Co;lrhAOr 100 56 Thin MAY 1515 75 53025 $34,765.11
BON TA 72 ND AV INTERSTAT HW Collector 100 86 Thin Wady 1170 35 40950 •26,848.30
BONITA INTERSTAT HW 72 NO AV Collector 100 86 Thin MAY 1170 35 40950 $26,848.30
WALNUT PACIFIC HW PACIFIC MV NeiQh'd Route 70 63 Thin Orly 245 >D 7350 34.818.93
ASH COWLES CT GARRETT ST N4Igh'It Route 14 67 Thln Orty 205 30 6160 ;.4,0]2.16
BENCHVIEW BULL MOUN RD ALPINE VI N41gh'd Route 82 75 Thin OAay 695 30 20850 $13,670.01 $535,281
95 TH END OAK ST Lou, 61 54 Orly 285 25 7125 39,772.10
66 TH END 68 TH PV/ Local 62 55 OAy, 455 25 11375 $15,537.21
66 TH 68 TH PW HAMPTON ST Lout 62 55 Overlay, 1045 25 26125 375,684.37
FERN CITY LIMI 138 TH AV Local 77 70 Slurry 355 25 8875 $1,939.59
LOMITA 90 TH AV CUL-DE-SA Lout 62 55 MAY 575 25 14375 $19,634,94
SPRUCE 89 TH AV HALL SL Lou; 62 55 Overlay 720 25 18000 324,586.36 $107,115
Sub Total 3612.395.63
Enal-ring 6 Admin•10%. $64, 239.56
Overlay Cost•$1.365/1.1. , Thin 0dye30.655/s.l. Slurry Cost-30.218/5 .l. Toll
Accumulated Raw- Total $442,093.82
FY 2007.2005
Road Name Limits From To CIu6111"t n 1999 PCI 2007 PCI Rewmmend Anion PrL,englh Width Area ($.I.) Cost
72 NO BONITA RD SANDBURG ST Arterla; 100 84 Thin Overlay 2595 40 103800 $70,096.69
72ND SANDSURG ST FIRST Arterial 100 84 Th in 0Ay 680 40 27200 $18,368.30
72 ND HUNZIKER ST HAMPTON ST Arterial 100 84 Thn Orly 325 40 13000 $8,778.97
DURHAM PACIFIC HW SUMMERFIE DR Arterial 95 79 Thin Overlay 560 40 22400 $15,12684
DURHAM HALL SL 79 TH AV Art 100 84 Thn Orly 1695 40 67800 $45,785.70
DURHAM 79 TH AV 74 TH AV Arterial 100 84 Thln Orly 1165 40 46600 331,469.23
PFAFFLE HALL BL HALL SL Collector 70 54 Orly 215 35 7525 310,586.82
121 ST NORTH DAK ST MANZANITA CT Collector 70 54 Overlay 970 35 33950 347,763.78
BONITA 79 TH AV MILTON CT Collector 85 69 Thin Orly 1170 35 40950 $27,653.75
TIEDEMAN CITY LIMI 106 TH AV Collector 77 61 Thin Overlay 225 35 7875 $5,318.03
BURNHAM ASH AV MAIN ST Collector 86 70 Thin Orly 150 35 5250 $3,545.35
CASCADE GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RC Collector 80 64 Thin Ody 880 35 30800 320,799.40
WALNUT GRANT AV PACIFIC HW Collector BO 64 ThIn OAry 475 35 16625 531,22695
MISTLETOE HILLSHIRE DR BENCHVIEW CT N.Igh'd Route 82 74 Thin Mrly 360 30 10800 $7.293.30
SATTLER 100 TH AV 98 TH AV Neigh'd Route 82 74 Thin Overlay 475 30 14250 $9.623.10
115 TH GENESIS LP CITY LIMI Naigh'd Route 82 74 Th in Overly 480 30 14400 $9.724.40
WINTERLAKE SHORE DR WINTERLAKCT Neigh'd Route 83 75 Thn Orly 1000 30 30000 $20,259.16
108 TH TITAN LN DURHAM RD Naigh'd Route 78 70 Thln Orly 880 30 26400 317,828.06
98 TH DURHAM RD SUMMERFIE DR Neigh'd Route 77 69 Thin Orly 1160 30 34800 $23,500.62
95 TH GREENBURG RD SHADY LN Nelgh'd Routs . 90 82 Thn Orly 1810 30 54300 $36,669.08
97 TH MURDOCK ST MCDONALD ST Nelgh'd Route 90 82 Thin Overlay 1968 30 59040 $39,870.02
98 TH SUMMERFIE DR SATTLER ST N.Igh'd Rout. 87 79 Thin Overlay 1060 30 31800 $21,474.71
98 TH LONDON CT GREENBURG RC Noigh'd Route 100 92 Thin OAay 3045 30 31350 321,170.82 $523,933
ANN 124 TH AV CUL•DE-SA Local 63 55 Orly 535 25 13375 318,817.10
LANDAU 77 TH AV 72 ND AV local 74 60 Slurry 1267 25 31675 37,130.10
TIGARD 116 TH AV 115 TH AV Local 66 58 Orly 264 25 6600 •9,285.45
ELMHURST 72 ND AV 70 TH AV Local 67 59 Slurry 515 25 12875 52,898.19
126 TH KAREN ST CULDE-SA Local 68 60 Slurry 375 25 9375 $2,110.33
KATHERINE 131 ST AV 128 TH AV Local 70 62 Slurry 590 25 14750 $3,320.25
105TH CUL•DE•SA MCDONALO ST Local 71 63 Slurry 390 25 9750 $2,194.74
KATHERINE KAROL CT KAROL CT Lout 72 64 Slurry 31,70 25 7925 31,783.93
COLONY CREEK CULAE Sl1 CULDE SA Local 80 72 Slurry 850 25 21250 $4,783.41
133 RD 132 ND AV BULL MOUN RD Local 53 45 Overlay 1625 25 40625 $57,154.74 $109,478
Sub Total $633,411.32
Engineering 6 Admin.10%, $63,341.13
Overlay Cosla31.406/e.l., Thin Overlay-30.675/s.l. Slurry Cost•30.225/s.l. Total
Accumulated R. -Total $545,341.37
FY 20032009
Road Name Limits From To Clueillcaton 1999 PCI 2008 PCI Recommend Action PrLlengm Width Area(e.IJ Cost
DURHAM SUMMERFIE LN SUMMERFIE LN Arterial 100 82 Thin Ortay 560 40 22 GO $15,580.64
WALNUT 139TH AV 135 TM AV Arterial 100 82 Thin Orly 880 40 35200 $24,483.87
WALNUT 69 TH AV 69 TH AV Collector 76 58 Thin Orly 395 35 13825 $9,616.18
121 ST ROSE VIST OR HOWARD DR Collector at 63 Thin OAry 1170 35 40950 $28,483.36
69TH PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Collector 82 64 Thin Orly 140 35 4900 $3,408.27
OAK 87 TH AV HALL BL Collector 100 82 Thin Overlay 220 35 7700 35,355.85
135 TH WALNUT ST SCROLLS F RD Collector 100 82 Thin Orly 3787 35 132545 392,193.59
SCOFFINS ASH AV ASH AV Collector 100 82 Thin Mrlay 155 35 5425 33,77344
HAMPTON 68 TH PW 66 TH AV Collacter 82 64 Thin Orley 305 35 10675 $7,425.15
HAMPTON 66 TH AV 66 TH AV Collector 82 64 Thin Overly 225 35 7875 $5,477.57
OAK 72 ND AV 71STAV Collector 82 64 Thin 0Ay 460 35 16100 $111 859
CASCADE GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RC Collector 95 77 Thin Orly 2490 35 87150 $60,618.44
CASCADE SCHOLLS F RD SCHOLLS F RD Collector 82 64 Thin Ortay 581 35 20335 $14,144.30
HAMPTON 70 TH AV 68 TH PW Collector 90 72 Thin Overlay 535 35 18725 313,024.44
HUNZIKER HALL BL 72 NO AV Collector 94 76 Thin Overlay 3855 35 134925 393,849.03
ASCENSION MISTLETOE DR WALNUT LN Neigh'd Route 62 73 Thin Orley 4180 30 125400 $87,223.78
MISTLETOE ASCENSION DR ESSEX OR Nvith'd Rout. 82 73 Thin Overly 255 30 7650 $5,321.07
MISTLETOE ASCENSION DR HILLSHIRE OR Neigh'tl Route 82 73 Thln OAry 1615 30 48450 $33,700.30
MISTLETOE BENCHVIEW CT ALPINE N+Igh'd Foul: 82 73 Thin Overlay 3065 30 31950 322,223.28
OAK 71 ST AV 69 TH AV Nelgh'tl Route 82 73 Thln Orley 635 30 19050 313,250.50
OMARA HILL ST CHELSEA LP NeIQh'tl Route 76 67 thin Orly 615 30 18450 572,833.16
PARK WATKINS AV GRANT AV Neigh'd Route 76 67 Thin Orly 695 30 20050 $14,502.52 -
WATKINS WATKINS PL WALNUT ST Nei2h'tl Route 77 68 Thin OAay 1185 30 35550 $24,727.32
NORTH DAKOTA SPRINGWOO DR ANTON DR NeIQh'tl Route 78 69 Thin Orley 530 30 15900 511,059.47 $613,474
PARK DERRY DEL CT WATKINS AV Local 76 67 Slurry 1250 25 31250 $7,245.46
76 TH ENO BONITA RD Local 73 64 Slurry 200 25 5000 31,159.27
CLINTON 69 TH AV 68 TH AV Local 73 64 Slurry 260 25 6500 31,507.06
FERN CITY LIMI 135 TH AV Local 73 64 Slurry 125 25 3125 $724.55
121 ST GAAROE ST ROSE VIST DP. Local 77 68 Slurry 520 25 13000 33,014 11
79 TH PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Local 74 65 SIuM 211 25 5275 31,223.03
79TH PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Local 74 65 Slurry 317 25 7925 $1,837.45
87 TH MCDONALD ST CUL.DE•SA Local 74 fi5 Slurry 525 25 13125 $3,043.09
DERRY DELL PARK ST WATKINS AV Local 74 65 Slurry 495 25 12375 $2,869.20
114TH CULDE•SA TIGARD ST Local 74 65 Slurry 580 25 14500 $3.361.89
136 TH CUL•DE•SA WALNUT LN Loc+l 74 64 Slurry 205 25 5125 31,188.26
PARK GRANT AV PACIFIC HW Local 78 69 Slurry 175 25 4375 31,014.36
MANIANITA 119TH AV 115 TH AV Local 75 66 Slurry 840 25 21000 $4,860.95
126 TH BULL MOON RD END Local 66 57 Orley 440 25 11000 315,940.02
JULIA CULDE-SA 93 RD AV Local 80 71 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2,318.55
APPENDIX A-2
Page A 22
LEHMAN GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RC Local 80 71 Slurry 255 25 6375 $1,478.07
MARTHA COPPER CR OR 93 RD AV Local 80 It Slurry 430 25 10750 $2,492.44
MILLEN 93 RD AV 92 ND AV Local 80 71 Slurry 395 25 9875 $2,289.57
113 TH CUL•DF.SA cut of LA Local 80 71 Slurry 320 25 8900 $1,55424
123 RD CUL DE-SA KATHERINE ST Local 80 71 Slurry 430 25 10750 $2,492.44
SERENA WOODCREST AV PICKS CT Local 82 73 Slurry 1105 25 27625 $6,404.99
93RD CUL•DE•SA MARTHA ST Local 82 73 Slurry 1400 25 35000 $8,114.92
MILLEN COPPER CR OR MILLEN194 CT Local M 75 Slurry 520 25 13000 $3.014.11
CARDINAL SEQUOIAP CUI.DE.SA Local 54 75 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2,318.55
BOXELDER HILLSHIRE DR MINT PL Local 82 73 Slurry 265 25 6625 $1,536.04
IRONWOOD SPRINGWOO DR SPRINGW00 DR Local 82 73 Slurry 2270 25 56750 $13,157.76
RIVERWOOD RIVERWOOD PL END Local 82 73 Slurry 1825 25 45625 $10,578.38 $107,047
Sub Total $720,521.30
EnSineering b Adminel0)G, $72,052.13
Overly Cosl•$t.449/s.l., Thin Oveday.$0.697/s.f. Slurry Cosl•$0231/5.1. Total
Accumulated Reserve Total $552,767.94
FY 2009.2010
Road Name Limits From To ClasdOcaton 1999 PCI 2009 PCI Recommend Action PrUenjith Width Arse (s.L) Cost
LOCUST 92 ND AV HALL BL Collector 90 70 Thin Ondy 1561 35 54635 $39,142.23
MAIN SCOFFINS ST PACIFIC HW Collector 85 65 Thin Overly 550 35 19250 $13,791.30
MCDONALD 105 TH AV 93 RD AV Collector 94 74 Thin Overlay 32% 35 115360 $82,667.52
OAK 95 TH AV 90 TH AV Coltectar 91 71 Thin Overly 430 35 15050 $10,702.29
PFAFFLE HALL SL 83 RD AV Collector 100 80 Thin Overly 660 35 23100 $16,549.56
WALNUT TIEDEMAN AV FONNERST Collector 90 70 Thin Overly 211 35 7385 $5,290.85
WALNUT FONNER ST 106 TH AV Collector 90 70 Thin Overly 370 35 12950 $9,277.79
121 ST JAMES ST FONNER ST Collector 85 65 Thin Overlay 330 35 11550 $8,274.78
121 ST WALNUT ST ANN ST Collector 90 70 Thin Overly 464 35 16240 $11,634.85
121 ST ANN ST MERESTONE CT Collector 90 70 Thin Overly 1565 35 54775 $39.242.53
FALCON RISE MORNING H OR MORNING H DR Nelgh'd Route 86 76 Thin Overly 730 30 21900 $15,689.85
KABLE 100 TH AV I00 TH AV Nelgh'd Route 84 74 Thin Overlay 330 30 9900 $7,092.67
TIGARD TIEDEMAN AV TIEOEMAN AV Nsigh'd Route 86 76 Thin Ovady 170 30 5100 $3,653.80
SATTLER 92 ND AV 91 ST AV Nelgh'd Route 92 82 Thin Overly 130 30 3900 $2,794.08
79 TH CHURCHILL WY CHURCHILL WY Neigh'd Route 67 57 Overly 145 30 4350 $6,492.66
79 TH THURSTON OR GENTLEWOO DF Nelgh'd Route 82 72 Thin Overly 535 30 16050 $11,498.72
92 ND PARKING L DURHAM RD Noigh'd Route 91 81 Thin Overly 2402 30 72060 $51,626.05
JOHNSON GRANTAV PACIFIC HW NNgh'd Route 67 57 OVedyr 710 30 21300 $31,791.64
NORTH DAKOTA ANTON DR 121 ST AV Nelgh'd Route as 75 Thin Oveday 1525 30 45750 $32,776.74
PINEBROOK 92 ND AV HALL BL Naigh'd Route 83 73 Thin Overly 1835 30 55050 $39,439.55
SPRINGWOOD 121 ST AV COTTONWDO LP Nelgh'd Route 82 72 Thin Overly 1430 30 42900 $30,734.91
SUMMERFIELD DURHAM RD DURHAM RD Nalgh'd Rout. 68 58 Overly 290 30 8700 $12,985.32 W3,209.68
SUMMERCREST TIGARD DR CUL•DE•SA Local 77 67 Slurry 1885 25 47125 $11,253.94
107 TH CU4DE•SA 107 TH CT Local 75 65 Slurry 106 25 2650 $632.85
MORNINGSTAR WOODSHIRE LN CUL•DE•SA Local 82 72 Slurry 1675 25 41875 $10,000.19
MANZANITA 121 STAV CU4DE•SA Lout 77 67 Slurry 264 25 6600 $1,576.15
MERESTONE CUL•DE.SA 121 ST AV Local 77 67 Slurry 435 25 10875 $.597.06
MURDOCK 106 TH AV END Local 77 67 Slurry 160 25 4000 $955.24
SERENA PICKS CT GRIMSON CT Local 77 67 Slurry 680 25 17000 $4,059.78
STEVEN CU4DE•SA CRESMER DR local 77 67 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1,373.16
SUMMERCREST CUL-DE•SA SUMMERCRE DI Local 77 67 Slurry 310 25 7750 $1,850.78
71 ST PINE ST OAK ST Local 82 72 Slurry 415 25 10375 52.477.66
COTTONWOOD 115 TH AV SPRINGWOO DR Lou; 83 73 Slurry 2445 25 61125 $14,597.29
71 ST PACIFIC HW SPRUCE ST Local 82 72 Slurry 450 25 11250 $2,686.62
71ST SPRUCE ST PINE ST Local 82 72 Slurry 415 25 10375 $2,477.66
71 ST OAK ST MAPLELEAF ST Local 112 72 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2,388.10
76TH END SPRUCE ST Local 82 72 Slurry 250 25 6250 $1,492.57
85 TH INEZ ST GREENSWAR LN Local 82 72 Slurry 430 25 10750 $2,567.21
87 TH INEZ ST CUL,DE SA Local 82 72 Slurry 280 25 7000 $1,671.67
92 NO GREEN BURG RD END Local 82 72 Slurry 970 25 24250 35,791.15
93 RD NORTH DAN ST END Local 82 72 Slurry 380 25 9500 $2,268.70
ALPINE VIEW BENCHVIEW TR MISTLETOE DR Local 82 72 Slurry 665 25 16625 $3,970.22
ALPINE VIEW CUL.DE•SA BENCHVIEW TR Local 82 72 Slum 300 25 7500 $1,791.08
ASHFORD 76 TH AV CUL.DE-SA Local 82 72 Slurry 1045 25 26125 $6,238.92
BENISH WALNUT ST MORNING H DR Local 82 72 Slurry B40 25 21000 $5,015.02
BEREA CRESMER OR GARRETT ST Local 82 72 Slurry 430 25 10750 $2,567.21
BRIM CUL.DE-SA BENCHVIEW TR Local 82 72 Slurry 695 25 17375 $4,149.33
SROADMOOR END WHITEHALL LN Local 82 72 Slurry 305 25 7625 $1,820.93
CLINTON 67 TH AV END Local 82 72 Slurry 130 25 3250 $776.13
COOK 107 TH AV WATKINS AV Laval 82 72 Slurry 495 25 12375 $2.955.20 $102,001.92
Sub Total $585,221.60
Engineering 6 Admin.10%, $58,521.16
Overlay Cost.$1.492/s.f. , Thin Ovefly.$0.716/s.f. Slurry Coal -SO .238/sL Total
Accumulated Reserve Total $709,035.18
FY 2010.2011
Road Name Limits From To CIesHRcahm 1999 PCI 2010 PCI Recommend Action PrUontth Width Area (s.13 Cost
68TH HAINES RD PACIFIC HW Collector 76 54 Overly 1930 35 67550 $103,847.47
DARTMOUTH PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Collector 76 54 Overlay 220 35 7700 $11,837.54
FONNER ERROL ST WALNUT ST Collector 71 49 Carly 330 35 11550 $17,756.30
MAIN PACIFIC HW FANNO CRE BR Collector 76 $4 Overly 305 35 10675 $16,411.13
68TH ELMHURST ST HAINES RD Collector 94 72 Thin Overly 2275 35 79625 $58,757.22
121ST SPRINGWOOOR SCHOLLSF RD Collector 100 78 Thin Overlay 750 35 26250 $19,370.51
HAMPTON 68 TH PW 68 TH PW Collector 100 78 Thin Overly 225 35 7875 $5,811.15
HOWARD 121 ST AV END Collector 100 78 Thin Overly 1735 35 60725 $44,810.45
DARTMOUTH PACIFIC HW 69 TH AV Collector 100 78 Thin Overlay 2975 35 104125 $76,836.37
100 TH KASLE ST KABLE ST Neigli d Route 70 59 Thin Overly 429 30 12870 $9.497.09
68 TH HAMPTON ST ELMHURST ST Neh h'd Route 93 82 Thin Overly 1552 30 46560 $34,357.76
74 TH END SPRUCE ST Nalgh'd Route 78 67 Thin Overly 590 30 17700 $13,061.26
74 TH BARBARA LN TAYLORS F RD Nelgh'd Route 90 79 Thin Overly 1490 30 44700 $32,985.22
78 TH PFAFFLE ST PFAFFLE ST Nelah'd Route 90 79 Thin Overlay 1195 30 35850 $26,454.59
79 TH DURHAM RD BOND ST N.igh'd Route 95 84 Thin Overlay 545 30 16350 $12,065.06
79 TH MARA CT BONITA RD Nalgh'd Route 85 74 Thin Overly 100 30 3000 $2.213.77 $465,073
87 TH PACIFIC SW CENTER ST Local 78 67 Slurry 250 25 6250 $1,537.34
09 TH END END Loral 78 67 Slurry 445 25 11125 $,736.47
OLD ORCHARD SUMMERFIE DR SUMMERFIE DR Local 78 67 Slurry 330 25 8250 $2.029.29
SEREIIA SERENA WY DURHAM RD Local 82 71 Slurry 210 25 5250 $1,291.37
EDGEWOOD OMARA ST OMARA ST Local 84 73 Slurry 2670 25 66750 $16,418.82
76 TH VARNS ST CRESTVIEW 5T Local 80 69 Slurry 33D 25 8250 $2,029.29
91ST GREENBURG RD CUL.DE•SA Local 80 69 Slurry 725 25 18125 $4,458.29
CORYLUS CUL•DE-SA HAZELTREE TA Loin 80 69 Slurry 372 25 9300 $,287.57
GARDEN PARK 110 TH AV 110 TH AV Local e0 69 Slurry 1115 25 27875 $6,856.55
FAIRVIEW FAIRVIEW CT CUL•DE-SA Local 82 71 Slurry 560 25 14000 $3,44365
FANNO CREEK FANNO CRE CT FANNO CRE DR Local 82 71 Slurry 550 25 13750 $3,382.15
GARRETT ASH AV CRESMER DR local 82 71 Slurry 690 25 17250 $4,243.06
GENTLEWOOOS ASHFORD ST ASHFORD ST Local 82 71 Slurry 150 25 3750 $922.41
GREENAENF GREENS WY CUL.DE-S4 1-1 82 71 Slurry 264 25 6600 $1,623.43
GREENFIELD RIDGEFIEL LN BENCHVIEW TR Local 82 71 Slurry 765 25 19125 $4,704.27
KENT CUL.DE•SA GREENLAND DR Local 82 71 Slurry 440 25 11000 $2,705.72
LEAH END END Loc.; 82 71 Slurry 585 25 14625 $3,597.38
LIDEN WILTON AV MARCIA OR local 82 71 Slurry 905 25 22625 $5,565.18
LUKAR ASCENSION DR END local 82 71 Slurry 195 25 4875 $1,199.13
MILLEN194TH MILLEN DR MILLEN DR Local 82 71 Slurry 240 25 6000 $1,475.85
APPENDIX A-1
Page A 2.3
MURDOCK 103 RD AV 98 TH AV Local 82 71 Slurry 1470 25 36750 $9,039.37
NORTHVIEW 140 TH TE MARCIA DR Local 82 71 Slurry 460 25 11500 $2,828.71
OAKTREE ALDERBROO CR ALDERBROO OR Local 82 71 Slurry 810 25 20250 34,980.99
OXALIS ASCENSION DR END Local 62 71 Slurry 180 25 4500 $1,]0889
PATHFINDER 107 TH CT CUL•D!•SA Local E2 71 Slurry. 345 25 8625 12,121..53
RACELY LEAH TE CUL•DE•SA Local 82 71 Slurry 235 25 5878 $1,445.10
RIDOEFIELI) ENO WILMINGTO LN Local 82 71 Slurry as 25 2125 $522.70
RIDGEFIELD WILMINGTO LN CUL•DE•SA Local 82 71 Slurry 740 25 18500 34,55053
ROCKINGHAM END 132 ND AV Local 82 71 Slurry 730 25 18250 $4,189.04 $103,592
Sub Total $589,665.18
Engineering 6 Admine10q, 556 ,966.52
Overlay Cosle31.537/s.l. , Thin Overlay-$0.737/s.l. Slurry Coste3O.245/s.L Total
Accumulated Ream Total $860,103.49
FY 2011.2012
Road Name Limits From To Classifkalon 1999 PCI 2011 PCI Reeommesq Action PrLenjiM )Yldlh Area (s,f.) Coe:
FONNER CITY LIMI 115 TH AV Collector 100 76 •Reconstnctlon 1290 35 45150 $270,900.00
FONNER 115 TH AV Collector 82 58 -Reconstruction 175 35 6125 $36,750.00
FONNER CITY LIMI 107 TH CT Collector 82 55-Amnstructlon 680 35 23900 $142,800.00
FONNER 107 TH CT ERROL ST Collector 82 58 •Recanstru!tion 680 35 23800 $142,800.00
FONNER 113 TH PL CITY LIMI Collector 100 '6 •Reconslructlon 830 35 29050 $174,300.00 $767,550
TIEDEMAN 106 TH AV MEADOW ST Collector 100 76 Thin Overlay 1010 35 35350 326,888.19
TIEDEMAN MEADOW ST TIGARD ST Collector 100 76 Thin Overlay, 990 35 34650 $26,336.15
WALNUT PATHFINDE CT GRANT AV Collector 100 76 Thin Overlay 950 35 33250 $25,272.06
ALDERBROOK ALDERBROO DR ALDERBROO DR Nf:gh'd Route 72 60 Thin Oredey 1745 30 52350 $39,789.25
ALDER ROOK ALDERBROO OR ALDERBROO DR N.igh'd Route 83 71 Thin Overlay 1745 30 52350 $39,789.25
ASH 100 TH AV COWLES CT N.Igh'd Route 88 76 Thin Overlay 465 30 13950 $10,602.87
ASH GARRETT ST HILL ST N.Igh'd Route 92 80 Thin Overlay 1565 30 46950 135,684,91
SENCHVIEW BRIM PL CLEARVIEW WY Naigh'd Route 85 73 Thin Overlay 1025 30 30750 $23,371.91
CANTERBURY 109 TH AV 103 RD AV Nalgh'd Route 90 78 Thin Overlay 1170 30 35100 127,478.52
COMMERCIAL HALL BL MAIN ST Neigh'd Route 92 80 ThIn Overlay 1765 30 52950 541,152.64
FALCON RISE MORNING H DR 125 TH CT Nelgh'd Rout. 90 78 Thin Overlay 1294 30 38820 $30,390.76
FREWING CUL•DE•SA ASH AV NNgh'd Route 82 70 Thin Overlay 275 30 8250 $6,458.63
FREWING OMARA ST A,SHAV N.Igh'd Route 86 74 Thin Overlay 590 30 17700 $13,856.69
GARRETT CRESMER DR PACIFIC HW Nelgh'd Route 93 81 Th ln Overlay 860 30 25800 120,197.89
GRANT PARK ST PARK ST N.Igh'd Route 85 73 Thin Overlay 180 30 5400 $4,227.47
GRANT PARK ST SCHOOL ST N.Igh'd Rout. 83 71 Thin Overlay 612 30 18360 $14,373.38
GRANT WALNUT ST MCKENZIE ST N.Igh'd Route 93 81 Thin Overlay 455 30 13650 $10,686.09
GRANT MCKENZIE ST JOHNSON ST N.I h'd Route 90 70 Thin Overlay 540 30 16200 $12,682.40
GRANT CULDE-SA GRANT CT N.Igh'd Route 85 73 Thin Overlay 300 30 9000 $7,045.78
HILLSHIRE BLUE GUM CT WESTRIDGE TE N41gh'd Route 90 78 Thin Overlay 7450 30 22350 $17.497.01
MCDONALD PACIFIC HW I05THAV N.igh'd Rout. 92 60 Thin Overlay 404 30 12120 $9,488.31
NORTH DAKOTA 115 TH AV 114 TH PL Neigh'd Rout. 83 71 Thin Overlay 275 30 8250 $6,458.63 $450,009
STARVIEW END END Local 82 70 Slurry 170 25 4250 $1,076.75
TALON AERIE OR END Local 82 70 Slurry 125 25 3125 $791.73
TANGELA 95 TH AV CUI.DE-SA Local 82 70 Slurry 335 25 8375 $2,121.84
TANOAK BRIM PL CUL•DE•SA Local 82 70 Slurry 335 25 8375 52,121.84
TERRACE TRAILS CULDE•SA 115 TH AV Local 82 70 Slurry 1015 25 25375 $6,428.86
VARNS 72 ND AV END Local 82 70 Slurry 140 25 3500 $886.74
WAGONER MISTLETOE DR CUL•DE•SA Local 82 70 Slurry 255 25 6375 $1,615.13
WATKINS CUL•DE-SA WATKINS AV Lout 82 70 Slurry 370 25 9250 $2,343.52
WELLINGTON CULDE SA ROCKINGHA DR Local 82 70 Slurry 415 25 10375 $2,628.55
WHITEHALL 135 TH AV BROADMOOR Pt Local 82 70 Slurry 250 25 6250 $1,583.46
WHITECEOAR CULDE•SA BENCHVIEW TR Local 82 70 Slurry 520 25 13000 $3,293.60
WILMINGTON END RIDGEFIEL LN Local 82 70 Slurry 475 25 11875 53,008.58
WINTERLAKE CULDE-SA WINTERLAK DR Local 82 70 Slurry 225 25 5625 $1,425.12
WOODSHIRE MORNINGST DR FERNRIDGE TE Local 82 70 Slurry 560 25 14000 $3,546.96
122ND KATHERINE ST CULDE'SA Lou: .2 70 Slurry 535 25 13375 13,380.61
123 RD WALNUT ST CUL•DE•SA Loca l 82 70 Slurry 340 25 8500 $2,153.51
123 RD GAARDE ST AERIE DR Laval 82 70 Slurry 170 25 4250 $1,076.75
124 TH AERIE DR END Local 82 70 Scurry 250 25 6250 $1,583.46
129TH MORNINGST DR END Local 82 70 Slurry ISO 25 4500 i1, 140.09
133 RD SENISH ST BENISH ST Local 82 70 Slurry 150 25 3750 $950.08
FIR 72 ND AV 72 ND AV Local 84 72 Slurry 935 25 23375 $5,922.15
GREENLEAF SUMMERFIE DR GREENS WY Local 84 72 Slurry 1220 25 30500 $7,727.30
AERIE TALON LN CULDE-SA Local 84 72 Slurry 1510 25 37750 $9,564.11
BLUE GUM HILLSHIRE DR CUL•DE•SA Local 83 71 Slurry 260 25 6500 $1,646.80
BROOKSIDE BROOKSIDE AV CULDE-SA Local 83 71 Slurry 315 25 7875 $1,995.16
FANNO CREEK FANNO CRE LP FANNO CRE DR Local 83 71 Slurry 710 25 17750 $4,497.03
SUMMERCREST NORTH OAK ST 121 ST AV Local 84 72 Slurry 1729 25 43225 $10,951.23
COPPER CREEK RIVERWOOD LN CUL•DE•SA Local 84 72 Slurry 1945 25 48625 $12,319.34
69 TH HAMPTON ST HAMPTON ST Local 84 72 Slurry 175 25 4375 51,105.42
88 TH REILING ST END Local 84 72 Slurry 130 25 3250 5823.40
89 TH CULOE-SA CULDE-SA Local 84 72 Slurry 550 25 13750 $3,483.62 $103,204
EnRinaering 6AdmIn-109r„ Sub Total $1,320,762.56
Overlay Coft•$1.583/s.1. , Thin Dverlay-30.760/s.1. Slur C.str• $132. 076.26
Slurry $0.253/3.[ Rammtructlon•36.0/s.f. Total
Accumulated Ream Total $207,564.68
FY 2012.2013
Road Name Limits From To Claasirkaton 1999 PCI 2012PCI Rtcomm.nd Action Prllength Width Area (s.f.) Cost
NORTH DAKOTA GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RC Neigh'd Route BS 72 Thin Overlay 390 30 11700 $9,159.51
NORTH DAKOTA 95 TH AV 95 TH AV Naigh'd Rout. 85 72 Thin Overlay 280 30 2400 56,576.06
NORTH DAKOTA 94 TH AV 90 TH AV Neigh'd Rout. 85 72 Thin Overlay 1115 30 33450 126,186.80
OMARA MCDONALD ST HILL ST Nalgh'd R.uta 85 72 Thin Overlay 1970 30 59100 $46,267.26
OMARA CHELSEA LP HALL SL Neigh'd Routs 90 77 Thin Overlay 1290 30 38700 $30,2%.63
SATTLER 300 TH AV 100 TH AV N.igh'd Route 93 80 Thin Overlay 195 30 5850 34,579.75
SATTLER 98 TH AV 96 TH AV Nelgh'd Route 93 80 Thin 0 ..lay 510 30 15300 $11,977.82
SATTLER 96 TH AV 92 NO AV NeI Wd Route 90 77 Thin Overlay 1320 30 39600 $31,003A1
SATTLER 91 ST AV 91 ST AV Neigh'd Rout. 90 77 Thin Overlay 265 30 7950 $6,223.77
SATTLER 91 ST AV 91 ST AV N.:gh'd Route 90 77 Thin Overlay 120 30 3600 $2,818.31
SATTLER NO NAME OR HALL SL Neigh'd Rout. 88 75 Thin Overlay 995 30 29850 $23,368.49
SEQUOIA PARKWAY BOONESFER RD BONITA RD N.igh'd Route 92 79 Thin Overlay 3085 30 92550 572,454.05
SPRINGWOOD SUMMER LA DR NORTH DAK ST N.igh'd Route 97 84 Thin Overlay 790 30 23700 $18,553.87
SPRINGWOOD IRONWOOD LP IRONWOOD LP N.igh'd Route 81 68 Thin Overlay 215 30 6450 $5,049.47
SPRINGWOOD SCHOLLS F RD SCHOLLS F RD N.Igh'd Route 81 68 Thin Overlay 490 30 14700 $11,508.30
SPRINGBROOK BARROWS ( RD TALLWOOD DR N.igh'd Rout. 90 77 Thm Overlay 360 30 10800 38,454.93
SUMMERFIELD 114 TH CT 98 TH AV N.igh'd Route 87 74 Thin Overlay 3680 30 110400 $86,428.18
SUMMERFIELD 114 TH AV DURHAM RD N.igh'd Route 90 77 Thin overlay 300 30 9000 $7,045.7.
SUMMERFIELD ALDERBROO DR ALDERBROO OR Neigh'd Route 78 65 Thin Overlay 1080 30 32400 $25,364.79
TIGARD 115 TH AV TWIN PARK PL N.igh'd Route 94 81 Thin Overlay 950 30 28500 $22,311.62
TIGARD TWIN PARK PL FANNO CRE SR Neigh'd Route 87 74 Thin Overlay 1862 30 55860 $43,730.78
TIGARD FANNO CRE BR TIEDEMAN AV N.Igh'd Route 90 77 Thin Overlay 370 30 11100 $8,689.79 5508,047
ALBERTA END 121 ST AV Local 84 71 Slurry 660 25 16500 $1,305.75
AMBIANCE GENESIS LP CULDE•SA Local 84 71 Slurry 460 25 11500 $3.000.98
FANNO CREEK 80 TH CT FANNO CRE PL Local 84 71 Slurry 165 25 4125 $1,076.44
FANNO CREEK FANNO CRE CT COLONY CR CT Local 84 71 Slurry 220 25 5500 51,435.25
FERN 138 TH AV CITY LIMI Local 84 71 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2,609.55
GREENLEAF GREENS WY GREENS WY Local 84 71 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2,609.55
KNOLL HALL BL HUNZIKER ST Local 84 71 Slurry 785 25 19625 $5,121.23
LAKEWOOD IRONWOOD LP CUL•DE-SA Local 64 71 Slurry 370 25 9250 12,413.83
MARA CULDE SA 79 TH AV Local 84 71 Slurry 290 25 7250 $1,891.92
MILTON BONITA RD CUL-DE SA Local 84 71 Slurry 1520 25 38000 $9,916.28
MINT SOXELDER ST CUL•DE•SA Local 84 71 Slurry 335 25 8375 $2,184.30
APPENDIX A-2
Page A2 4
MOUNTAIN RIDGE CUL•DE•SA 134 TH AV Local 84 71 Slurry 295 25 7375 $1,924.54
NOVA CUL•DE•SA GENESIS LP Local 84 71 Slurry 275 25 6875 $7.794.06
PICKS 103 RO AV SERENA WY Local as 71 Slurry 120 25 3000 $782.86
PICKS SEREMA WY SERENA WY local 84 71 Slurry 200 25 SOD) $1.304.77
REILING 88 TH AV CUL-DE•SA Local 64 71 Slurry 6,45 25 16125 $4,207.89
SYLVAN CUL-DE•SA SERENA WY Local 84 71 Slurry 265 25 6526 $1,728.82
WILLOWBROOK END 109 TH AV Local 84 71 Slurry 120 25 3000 $782.86
100 TH LADY MART OR MURDOCK ST local 114 71 Slurry 645 25 21125 $5,512.67
ASHBURY SWENDON LP SWENDON LP Local 85 72 Slurry 370 25 9250 $2,413.63
FERNRIDGE END MORNINGST DR Local 86 73 Slurry 470 25 11750 $3,066.22
WAVERLY 92 NO AV END Local 86 73 Slurry 1215 25 30375 $7,926.50
BASSWOOD CUL•DE•SA IRONWOOD LP Local 86 13 Slurry 352 25 8800 $2,296.40
SOXELDER MINT PL ESSEX DR Local 86 73 Slurry 240 25 6000 $1,565.73
CHIMNEY RIDGE MORNING H DR 131 ST AV Local 86 73 Slurry 520 25 13000 $3,392.41
ESSEX HILLSHIRE DR SOXELDER ST Local 86 73 Slurry 1590 25 39750 $10,372.95
FANNO CREEK CUL•DE•SA CUUDE•SA Local 88 73 Slurry 270 25 6750 $1,761.44
MARCH 139 TH AV LIDEN OR Local 86 73 Slurry 725 25 18125 $4,729.80
113 TH FONNER ST END Local 86 73 Slurry 475 25 11875 $3.098.84
118 TH CUL•DE-SA SPRINGWOO OR Local 86 73 Slurry 475 25 11875 $3,098.84
67 TH CUL•OESA OAK ST Local 88 75 Slurry 2:5 25 6375 $1,663.59
69 TH OAK ST END local as 75 Slurry 275 25 6875 $1,794.06
FAIRVIEW CUL•DE.SA FAIRVIEW LN Local as 75 Slury 355 25 6875 $2,315.97
WEAVER FANNO CRE DR END Local as 75S. lrry 140 25 3500 $913.34
123 RD END MARION ST Local 88 15 Slurry 130 25 3250 $848.10
76TH BOND ST END Local 95 82 Slurry 255 25 6375 51,663.59
91 ST CU40E•SA NORTH DAK ST Local 95 82 Slurry 495 25 12375 $3.229.31
94 TH GREENBURG RD CUL•OE-SA Local 95 82 Slurry 154 25 3850 $1,004.68
FANNO CREEK END BOONESFER RD local 95 82 Slurry 390 25 9750 $2,544.31
109 TH NAEVE ST NAEVE ST Local 95 82 Slurry 500 25 12500 $3,261.93 $117,567
Ellglneerlng 6 Mmfn.lOlL, Sub Total $625,613.95
$62.561.40
Overlay Cost-S1.630/s.f., Thin Overlay-50.782/s.f. Slurry Cost-$0.260/al. Reconstruction-$6.18/s.1. Toth
Accumulated Reserve Total $319,389.33
FY 2013.2014
Road Name Limits From To CIUsIRcatoe 1999 PCI 2013 PCI Recommend Action PrUenglb Width Area (s.W Cost
VENTURA 72 ND AV VENTURA PL flelgh'd Route 83 69 Thin Overlay 1840 30 55200 $44,510.51
VENTURA VENTURA OR CUL•DE•SA N.Igh'd Route 88 74 Thin Overlay 355 30 10650 $8,587.63
WALNUT PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Neigh 'd Route 87 73 Thin Overay 325 30 9750 $7,861.91
WATKINS PACIFIC HW DERRY DEL CT Nelgh'd Route BS 71 Thin Overlay 1697 30 50910 $41,051.27
WINTERLAKE CUL•DE-SA SHORE DR Nelah'd Route 90 76 Thin Overlay 2030 30 60900 $49,106.70
100TH SATTLER ST LADY MARI DR Nelgh'd Route 93 79 Thin Overlay 250 30 7500 $6,047.62
100 TH MURDOCK ST PEMBROOK ST Nelgb'd Route 85 71 Thln Qaday 350 30 10500 $8,466.67
100TH INEZ ST MCDONALD ST N.Igh'd Route 85 71 Thin Overlay 1445 30 43350 $34.955.27
108 TH TUALATIN OR TITAN LN N.igh'd Route 93 79 Thin Overlay 985 30 29550 $23,827.64
110 TH FAIRHAVEN ST PARK ST Netgh'd Route 80 66 Thin D odw 789 30 23670 $19,086.30
115 TH GAAROE ST GENESIS LP N.Igh'd Route as 71 Thin Overlay 2164 30 64920 $52,348.23
116 TH END WALNUT ST Nelgh'd Route 92 78 Thin Overlay 1025 30 30750 $24.795.26
116 TH AHN ST KATHERINE ST Nslah'd Route 85 71 Thin Overlay 2020 30 30600 $24,674.30
116 TH BEEF BEND RD CUL•DE•SA N.Igh'd Route 85 71 Thin Overlay 670 30 20100 $16,207.63
127 TH 128 TH AV KATHERINE ST Nelgh'd Rout. 90 76 Thin Overlay 1500 30 45000 $36.285.74
127 TH CUL.DE•SA FALCON RI OR NalaWd Route as 71 Thin Overly 505 30 15150 SI2,216.20
128 TH WALNUT ST FALCON RI DR N.Igh'd Route 90 76 Thin Overlay 2335 30 70050 $56,484.81
128TH CUL.DE•SA FALCON RI OR Ne11i'd Route 85 71 Thin Overlay 515 30 15450 $12,458.10
130TH CUL.DE•SA STARVIEW OR Nalgh'd Route 90 76 Thin Overly 945 30 28350 $22,860.02
135 TH WESTRIDGE TE LAUREN LN Neigh'd Route 90 76 Thin Overlay 320 30 9600 $7,740.96
135 TH LAUREN LN WALNUT LN Neigh'd Route 90 76 Thin Overly 2350 30 4050D $32,657.17 $542,230
69 TH HAMPTON ST DARTMOUTH S) Local 100 86 Slurry 1470 25 36750 $9,877.79
113 TH END CITY LIM! Local 61 47 Overlay 580 25 14500 $24,358.48
82 NO PFAFFLE ST PFAFFLE ST Local 64 50 Slurry 370 25 0250 $2,486.25
ASH HILL ST HILL ST Local 71 57 Overlay 270 25 6750 $11,339.29
BROOK CUL-DE•SA 124 TH AV Lout 76 62 Slurry 295 25 7375 $1,982.28
CARMEN 121 ST AV 121 ST AV Local 67 53 Overly 500 25 12500 $20,998.69
CENTER GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RC Local 67 53 Overlay 500 25 12500 $20,998.69
CENTER GREENBURG RD 87 TH AV Local 71 57 Overly 422 25 ID55D $17,722.90
DAWNS CUL•DE•SA 113 TH PL Local 76 62 Slurry 264 25 6600 $1,773.97
ELECTRIC MAIN ST END Local 74 60 Slurry 180 25 4500 $1,209.52 $112,748
Sub Total 5654,977.81
Engi.... Ina 6 Adm1n•1096 465,497.78
Overlay Cost.51.679/s.l. , Thin Ore1a2°$O.B06/s.f Slurry Cost.$0.268/s./. Reconslruction.56165/s.1. Total
Accumulated Reserve Total $398,913.75
FY 2014.2015
Road Name Llmlle From To Cla.slRcalon 1999 PCI 2014 PCI Recommend AtlIon PrlJ.ngth Width Area 01) Cost
COMMERCIAL PACIFIC HW 95 TH AV N.igh'd Rout. 100 88 -Reconstruction 1675 30 50250 $329,457.19 $329,457
91 ST REILING ST CUL•DE-SA Nelgh'd Route 93 78 Thin Overlay 550 30 16500 $13,703.92
98 TH ELROSE ST MCDONALD ST N.igh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 325 30 9750 $8,097.77
98 TH CUL•DE-SA ELROSE ST Nsigh'd Route 95 80 Thin Overlay 310 30 9300 $7,724.02
ALDERBROOK ALDERBROO DR END Nelgh'd Route 100 85 Thin Mrlay 280 30 5400 $6,976.54
ALDERBROOK DURHAM RD SATTLER ST N.Igh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overly 2855 30 85650 $71,135.78
ALDERBROOK ALDERBROO DR END N.Igh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 310 30 9300 $7.724.02
KABLE END 100 TH AV Y.eigh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 1450 30 43500 $36,228.50
KABLE 100 TH AV 98 TH AV Neigh'd Route 97 82 Thin Overlay 380 30 11400 $9,468.16
MORNING HILL 135 TH AV FALCON RI DR Neigh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overly 634 30 19020 $15,796.88
NAEVE PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Neigh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 540 30 16200 $13,454.75
NAEVE ROYALITY PW 109 TH AV Neigh'. Route 100 85 Thin Overlay 895 30 26850 $22,300.01
NORTH DAKOTA SCHOLLS F RD PRIVATE RO Nelgh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overly 620 30 18600 $15,448.05
NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE RD SPRINGWOO DR Nalgh'd Route 100 85 Thin Overly 245 30 7350 $6,104.47
NORTH DAKOTA 114 TH PL 112 TH AV N.Igh'd Rout. 100 85 Thin Overly 625 30 18750 $15,572.63
NORTH DAKOTA 109 TH AV PRIVATE RD Naigh'd Route 100 85 Thin parlay 950 30 28500 $23.670,10
OAK 697H AV 65 TH AV N.igh'd Rout. 100 85 Thin Overlay 960 30 28800 $23,919.56
PINE 72 NO AV 71 STAY NWIth'd Rout. 100 85 Thin Overlay 450 30 13500 $11,212.29
PINE 71 ST AV 69 TH AV Neigh'd Rout. 100 85 Thin Overly 640 30 19200 $15,946.37
ROYALITY PACIFIC HW NAEVE ST N.lah'd Rout. 100 85 Thin Overly 1035 30 31050 $25,788.28
ROYALITY PACIFIC HW 109 TH AV N.Igh'd Rout. 100 85 Thin Overly 1205 30 36150 $30,024.03
SUMMERFIELD C11L-DE-SA ALDERBROO OR N.igh'd Rout. 100 85 Thin Overly 175 30 5250 $4,360.34
SUMMERFIELD 98 TH AV ALDERBROO DR N.igh'd Rout. 100 85 Thin Overlay 940 30 28200 $23,421.24
GRANT JOHNSON ST TIGARD ST Local 93 78 Slurry 1090 25 27250 $7,544.07
LOW IA 90 TH AV 90 TH AV Local 66 51 Slurry 335 25 8375 $2,318.59
PARK 110 TH AV DERRY DEL CT Local 71 56 Slurry 280 25 7000 $1,937.93
ROSE VISTA 121 ST AV GAARDE ST Local 76 61 Slurry 1085 25 27125 $7,509.47
TECH CENTER END 72 NO AV Local 72 57 Slurry 1210 25 30250 $8,374.61
WARNER PACIFIC HW ENO Local 76 6l slurry 275 25 6875 $1,903.32
100 TH MCDONALD ST ASH AV Local 74 59 Slurry 575 25 14375 $3,979.67
124 TN WALNUT ST WALNUT ST local 75 60 Slurry 475 25 11875 $3,287.56
124 TH ANN CT KATHERINE ST Local 75 60 Slurry S40 25 13.'100 $3,737.43
129 TH END 128 TH AV Local 72 57 Overlay 319 25 7975 513,799.08
66TH FRANKLIN ST CUL-DE•SA Local 85 70 Slurry 185 25 4625 $1,280.42
66 TH OAK ST TAYLORS F RD Local 100 84 Slurry 625 25 15625 $4,325.73
69 TH HAMPTON ST HAMPTON ST Local 100 85 Slurry 520 25 14500 $4,014.28
70 TH END HAMPTON ST Local 85 70 Slurry $20 25 13000 $3,599.01
74 TH DURHAM RD BONITA RD local 95 80 Slurry
4670 25 116750 $32,321.86
APPENDIX A-2
Page A 2.5
76 TH BOND ST 80ND ST Local 00 75 Slurry 146 25 3625 $1,003.57
78 TH FIR ST VARNS ST Local 91 76 Slurry 515 25 12875 $3,564.40
76 TH PACIFIC HW PFAFFLE ST Local 85 70 Slurry 317 25 7925 $2,194.01 $100.695
Sub Total $644,130.22
Overlay A30/5 UT3~ $84113.02
Coat-S1 . 730/el.Thin MAy10.8301a1. Slurry Coat-30.276/al. RerXNlUruetlon•16.556/e.f. Total
Accumulated Reaem Total $270,$70.50
!Y 20152016
Road Name Limits From To peaalkabn IM PCs 2015 ►CI Recommend Action Pr1JemlgM Wkpl Arlo (F1) Coat
VENTURA BARBARA LN ALFRED ST Nalli Route 97 81 Thin Overlay 1460 30 44400 $37,982.27
VENTURA/69TH CUL-DE-SA VENTURA CT NUgh'd Rouse 95 79 Thin OwAy 211 30 6330 $5,415.04
VENTURA VENTURA CT CUL-DE-SA Nelgh'd Route 93 77 Thin Barley 550 30 16500 $14,115.03
WATKIN DERRY DEL CT WATKINS PL Nelgh'd Route 100 84 Thin MAY 365 30 10950 $9,367.25
WINTER&M WINTERLAKCT SCHOLLS FRD N41g11'd Roulo 100 64 Thin Overlay 1640 30 49200 $42,058.46
103RD RIVERWOOD UN DURHAM RD Nelgh'd Route 100 54 Thin MAY 1545 30 46350 $39,650.41
100 TH PEMBROOK ST INEZ ST N41gh'd Route 100 84 Thin MAY 330 30 9900 $8,469.02
110TH GMRDE ST FAIRHAVEN ST Heigh'd Route 100 84 Thin MAY 1245 30 37350 $31,951.30
115 TH 114 TH AV BAMBI LN Nalgh'd Route 97 81 Thin MAY 565 30 16950 $14.4919.99
115 TH TIGARD ST NORTH OAK ST Nalli Route 100 84 Thin MAY 910 30 27300 $23,353.96
115 TH NORTH DAK ST SPRINOWOO DR Naigh'd Route 100 64 Thln Mdy 1765 30 52950 $40,295.42
116TH ENO TIGARD DR NUgh'd Route 97 81 Thin Overlay 385 30 11550' $9,880.52
116 TH/KATHERINE 116 TH AV 116 TH AV Nelah'd Route 100 64 Thin MAY 158 30 4740 $4,054.86
116 TH CUL-DE-SA FAIRVIEW LN N41gh'd Route 93 77 Thin MAY 211 30 6330 $5.415.04
131 ST WALNUT ST BENISH BY Nelgh'd Route 100 54 Thin MAY 1065 30 31950 $27,331.84
131 ST CUL-DE-SA HAWKS BEA ST NU/h'd Route 100 84 Thin Ova ft 245 30 7350 $6,287.61 $325,159
'S T PFAFFLE ST STEVE ST Local as 72 Slurry 950 25 23750 $6,772.35
83 RD PFAFFLE ST CULTE•SA Local 90 74 Slurry 1335 25 33375 $9,516.95
87TH PINEBROOKST CUL•0E•SA Local 80 64 Scurry 300 25 7500 $2,136.64
68TH SATYLER ST REILING ST I-] 90 74 Slurry 425 25 10625 $3,029.74
88 TH PINEBROOK ST CUL-DE-SA Local 91 75 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2,851.52
89TH END END Local 87 71 Slurry 115 25 2575 $319.81
89 TH CUL•DE•St SCHECKLA OR Local 90 74 Slurry 205 25 5125 $1,461.40
89TH CUL•DE•SA RILING ST Lou] 67 71 Slurry 170 25 4250 $1,211.90
92 ND CENTER ST NORTH DAs( ST Local 100 34 Slurry 868 25 21700 $6,187.80
92ND/MURDOCK 92 ND AV CUL-DE-SA Local 90 74 Slurry 175 25 4375 $1,247.54
94 TH CUL•DE•SA NORTH DAN ST Local 85 69 Slurry 350 25 8750 $2,495.08
94 TH CUL-DE-SA VIEW TR Lout 85 72 Slurry 170 25 4250 $1,211.90
96 TH SATTLER ST MURDOCK ST Local 93 77 Slurry 695 25 22375 $61380.28
AERIE CU4DE•SA TALON LN Local 85 69 Slurry 325 25 5125 $2,316.86
ALBERTA END END Local 87 71 Slurry 410 25 10,50 $2,922.81
ALPINE VIEW MISTLETOE DR 134 TH DR Local 90 74 Slurry 250 25 6250 $1,782.20
ALPINE VIEW 133 RD AV END Local 90 74 Slurry 160 25 4000 $1,140.61
ANN CUL•DE•SA 121 BY AV Local 83 67 Slurry 440 25 11000 $3,135.57
ANN 121 STAV 116 TH AV Local 65 59 Slurry 1030 25 25750 $7,342.67
ASH END BURNHAM ST Local 85 69 Slurry 285 25 7125 $2,031.71
ASH ASH AV ASH AV Local 95 79 Slurry 1365 25 34125 $9,730.82
ASHWOOD CUL•DE•SA HAZELWOOD LP Local 87 71 Slurry 317 25 7925 $2,259.83
ALPINE RIDGE END BULL MOUN RD Local 85 69 Slurry 1525 25 35125 $10,871.43
ATLANTA 70 TH AV 67 TH AV Local 95 79 Slurry 614 25 15350 $4,377.09
AVON 88 TH AV CUL-DE-SA 1-, 87 71 Slurry 395 25 9875 $2,815.88
BARBARA/70TH BARBARA LN CUL-DE-SA Local 83 67 Slurry
220 25 5500 $1,568.34
BARNUM GARRETT ST BARNUM/9S DF Local 85 69 Slurry 345 25 8625 $2.459.44
BARNUM/98TH BARNUM DR CUL-DE-SA Local 85 69 Srurry 140 25 3500 $998.03
BAYLOR 72 ND AV d8 TH PW Local 85 69 Slurry 1145 25 28625 $8,162.48
BAYLOR 68 TH AV 66 TH AV Local 85 69 Slurry 529 25 13225 $3,771.14
BEVELAND CUL•DE•SA CUL DE-SA Local 90 74 Slurry 1030 25 25750 $7,342.67
BEVELAND CUL-DE•SA 72 NO AV Local 85 69 Scurry 739 25 18475 $5,268.19
13EVELAND 72 ND AV 70 TH AV Local 88 72 Slurry 700 25 17500 $4,990.16
BIRDSVIEW 130 TH AV 129 TH AV Local 90 74 Slurry 205 25 5125 $1,461.40
SLUESTEM END TALLWOOD DR Local 90 74 Slurry 120 25 3000 $855.46
BOXWOOD COTTONWOO LN CUL-DE-SA Local 86 70 Slurry 360 25 9000 $2,566.37
BRENTWOOD CUL.DE•SA BRENTWOOD Pt Local 85 69 Slurry 400 25 10000 $2,831.52
BRENTWOOD CUL-DE-SA ALDERBROO DR Lou: 87 71 Slurry 845 25 21125 $6,023.84
BRIDGEVIEW SHOREVIEW PL CUL-DE-SA Local 85 69 Slurry 215 25 5375 $1,532.69
BRITTANY 135 TH AV WINTERLAK DR Local 90 74 Slurry 1122 25 28050 $7,998.52
BROADMOOR WHITEHALL UN CUL-DE-SA Local 87 71 Slurry 420 25 30,00 $2,994.10
BROOKSIDE WALNUT ST JOHNSON ST Local 94 78 Slurry 975 25 24375 $6,950.58
BROOKSIDE BROOKSIDE PL JOHNSON AV Local 63 67 Slurry 460 25 11500 $3,279.25
BURLCREST SUMMERCRE OR 115 THAV Local 85 69 Slurry 1505 25 37625 $10,72845
BURLHEIGHTS 121 ST AV BURLCREST DR Local 85 69 Slurry 680 25 17000 $1,847.59
CARDINAL 72 NO AV SEQUOIAP Local 85 69 Slurry 470 25 11750 $3,350.54
CAROLE CUL-DE-SA 81 STAV Local 85 69 Slurry 330 25 8250 $2,352.51
CENTER LINCOLN AV GREENBURO RC Local 83 67 Slurry 1475 25 36875 $10,514.99
CENTURY OAK CENTURY O DR CENTURY O DR Local 83 67 Slurry 540 25 13500 $3,849.55
CENTURY OAK CUL-DE-SA CENTURY OCR Local at G5 Slurry 2465 25 61625 $17,572.50
CENTURY OAK CENTURY O CR SUMMERFIE DR Local 85 69 Slurry 581 25 14525 $1,141.84
CHATEAU CUL-DE-SA 108 TH AV Local 90 74 Stu" 570 25 14250 $4,06342
CHEHALEM CUL-DE-SA CUL-DE-SA local 90 74 Slurry 550 25 13750 $3,920.84
CHERRY 74 TH AV VARNS BY Lain 93 77 Slurry 1745 25 43625 $12,/39.76
CHURCHILL 80 TH AV 79 T H AV Local 90 74 Slurry 415 25 10375 $2,958.45
CLINTON 72 ND AV END Local 91 75 Slurry 634 25 15850 $4,519.66
CLINTON 68 TH PW 67 THAV Local 81 65 Slurry 270 25 6750 $1,924.78
CLOUD MCFARLAND BL CUL•DE.SA Local 90 74 Scurry 505 25 12625 53,600.05
CLYDESDALE CUL-DE-SA 106 TH AV Local 85 69 Slurry 158 25 3950 $1,126.35
CLYDESDALE1105TH CLYDESDAL PL CUL•DE•SA Local 82 66 Slurry 106 25 2650 $755.65
CLYDESDALE 106 TH AV CUL-DE-SA Local 87 71 Sluts 361 25 9025 $2,573.50
COOK SERENA WY CUL-DE-SA Local 90 74 Slurry 190 25 4750 $1,354.47
CORAL GREENSURG RD GREENSURG RC Local 85 69 Slurry 215 25 5375 $1,532.69
CORNELL TIGARD ST CUL-DE•SA Local 85 69 Slurry 375 25 9375 $2.673.30
COWLES CUL-DE-SA ASH AV Lou] 83 67 Slurry 225 25 5625 $1,603.98
CRANE END TALLWOOD OR Local 90 74 Slurry 100 25 2500 $71288
CRESMER ASH AV GARRETT ST Local 82 66 Slurry 1225 25 30625 $8,732.79
DANSUSH CUL-DE-SA WINTERLAK DR Local 85 69 Slurry 260 25 6500 $1.853.49 $280,832
EnRlaulnR 6Admin•307G, Sub Total $605,991.15
$60,599.11
Thin -lay-SO 855/a 1. Slurry Coet•$0.285/a.l. Total
AccumuHtod Re1em Total $403,780.23
FY 2916.2017
Road Name Limits From To Clafallkaton 19" PCI 2016 PCI Recommend Action PrLlenoth Width Area (a.l.) Coal
DARMEL CUL-DE-SA 96 TH AV Local 85 68 Slurry 300 25 7500 $2.202.50
DUCHILLY CUL-DE-SA HAZELHILL DR Lou; 83 66 Slurry 565 25 14125 $4,14861
EDGEWATER CUL-DE-SA SUMMERCRE Of Local 90 73 Slurry 300 25 7500 $2,202.80
ELEMAR CUL•OE-SA ALPINE RI OR Local 83 68 Slurry 575 25 14375 $4,222.03
ELROSE 93 RD AV CUL-DE-SA Local 88 71 Slurry 380 25 9500 $2.790.21
ESSEX BOXELOER ST LAUREN UN Local 90 73 Slurry 1230 25 30750 19.031!8
FAIRHAVEN/112TH CUL-DE•SA FAIRHAVEN ST Local 82 65 Slurry (60 25 4000 $1,174.83
FAIRHAVEN FAIRHAVEN Y/Y WATKINS AV Local 91 74 Slurry 345 25 8625 $2,53322
FAIRVIEYI 115 TH AV FAIRVIEW CT Lucas 90 73 Slurry 405 25 10125 $2,97318
FANNO CREEK BONITA RD 80 TH CT Local 95 78 Slurry 1155 25 28875 $8,480.78
FANNO CREEK FANNO CRE PL FANNO CRE CT Local 87 70 Sluts 660 25 16500 $4,846.16
FANNO CREEK COLONY CR CT HALL BL Local 90 73 Slurry 1000 25 25000 $7,342.67
FANNO CREEK FANNO CRE OR CUL-DE-SA Local 85 68 Slurry 320 25 8000 $2,349.65
APPENDIX A-2
Page A 2 6
FEIRING SWENDON LP 135 TH AV Local 57 70 Slurry 545 25 13625 $4,001.75
FIR CHERRY OR 76 IN AV Local 91 74 Slurry 295 25 7375 $2,156.09
FIR END 74 IN AV Local 90 73 Slurry 65 25 1625 (477.37
0+4L0 TIGARD ST YIGARD $T Local 85 68 Slurry 634 25 15550 $4,65625
GARDEN PARK 110 TH AV 110 TH AV Local 85 68 Slurry 205 25 5125 $1,505.25 I
GARDEN HALL SL CUL•W_•SA Local 90 73 Slurry 1025 25 25625 $7,526.24
GARRETT BEREA DR CUL•DE•SA Local 63 66 Slurry 211 25 5275 $1,549.30
GENTLEWOODS CUL•DE•SA GENTLEWOO DF Local 85 68 Slurry 255 25 6375 $1,572.38
GLACIER LILY SUMMER LA DR SUMMER LA DR Local 90 73 Slurry 1755 25 43675 $12,886.36
GLENWOOD CUL•DE-SA HAZELWOOD LP Local 87 70 Blurry 264 25 6600 $1,938.46
GONZAGA 72 ND AV 70 TH AV Local 93 76 Slurry 690 25 17250 $5,06644
GREENLAND RIVERWOOD LN SERENA V Y Local 87 70 Slurry 775 26 19375 $5,690.57
GREENFIELD END RIDGEFIEL LN Local 85 68 Slurry 610 25 15250 $4,479.03
GREENSWARD 86 TH AV HALL BL Local 90 73 Slurry 173 25 4375 $1,284.97
GREENS SUMMERFIE DR SUMMERFIE OR Loo' 84 65 Slurry 1588 25 39700 $11,660.16
GREENS GREENLEAF TR HIGHLAND DR Local 83 66 Slurry 355 25 8875 $2,606.65
GRIMSON CUL•DE•SA SERENA WY Local 85 68 Slurry 310 25 7750 $2,276.23
HAMLET HAMLET ST CUL.DE•SA Local 90 73 Slurry 340 25 8500 $2.496.51
HAWKS BEARD/129TH HAWKS BEA ST CUL•DE•SA Local 90 73 Slurry 200 25 5000 $1,468.53
HAWKS BEARD 135 TH AV 131 ST AV Local 90 13 Slurry $45 25 21125 $6.204.55
HAWKS BEARD 130 IN AV SUMMER IA OR Local 90 73 Slurry 443 25 11075 $3,252.80
HAZELHILL HAZELTREE TR DUCHILLYCT Local 100 83 Slurry 686 25 17150 $5,037.07
HAZELWOOD SPRINGWOO DR SPRINGWOO DR Local 87 70 Slurry 1425 25 35650 $10,470.65
HAZELTREE BULL MOON RD HAZELHILL DR Local 83 66 Slurry 560 25 14000 $4.111.89
HERMOSO BEVELAND RD 72 NO AV Lccal 90 73 Slurry 1100 25 27500 $8,076.94
HIGH TOR CITY LIMI BENCHVIEW TR Local 90 73 Slurry 280 25 7000 $2,055.95
HGHLAND CUL•DE•SA SUMMERFIE DR Local 80 63 Slurry 740 25 18500 $5,433.57
HIGHLAND SUMMERFIE DR 100 TH AV Local 93 76 Slurry 3160 25 94000 $27.608.43
HILL OMARA ST ASH AV Local 95 78 Slurry 1645 25 41125 $12,078.69
HILL/92NO CUL•DE•SA HILL ST Local 85 68 Slurry 185 25 4625 $1,358.39
HILLVIEW OMARA ST CUL•DE-SA Local as 71 Slurry 375 25 9375 $2,753.50
HOOOVIEW END KABLE ST Local 90 73 Slurry 1250 25 32000 $9,398.62
HORIZON CITY LIMI ASCENSION OR Local 90 73 Slurry 620 23 13000 S3,8Ie.19
INEZ 103 RD AV 100 TH AV Local 90 73 Slurry 790 25 19750 $5,800.71
INEZ CUL•DE•SA 87 TH CT Local 95 78 Slurry 1660 25 41500 $12,188.83
JAMES HOWARD OR END Lou[ 77 60 Slurry 460 25 11500 $3,377.63
JAMES 1247H AV 121 ST AV Local 88 71 Slurry 1250 25 31250 $9,178.34
JOHNSON JOHNSON ST CUL•DE.SA Local 90 73 Slurry 211 25 5275 21,549.30
JOHNSON END JOHNSON CT Local as 68 Slurry 260 25 6500 $1,909.09
JOHNSON JOHNSON CT GRANT AV Local 85 68 Slurry 1155 25 28875 $8,180.78
KAREN 127 TH AV 125 TH AV Local 90 73 Sluny 560 25 14000 $4,111.89
KATHERINE 128 TH AV CUL-DE-SA Local 90 73 Scurry 815 25 20375 $5,984.27
KATHERINE 125 TH AV 116 TH AV Lou: 97 80 Slurry 2538 25 63375 518,613.66
KATHERINE KAROL CT TIGARD ST Local 85 68 Slurry 253 25 6325 $1,857.70
KENT GREENLAND DR CUL.DE•SA Local 85 68 Slurry 375 25 9375 $2,753.50
KENT 108 TH AV 103 RD AV Local 93 76 Slurry 1250 25 31250 $9,178.34
KERI 104 TH AV CUL.DE•SA Local 90 73 Slurry 235 25 5875 $1,725.53
KIMBERLY SERENA CT 98 TH AV Local 87 7051urry 715 25 17875 $5,250.01
KROESE BO TH PL END Local 86 69 Slurry 150 25 3750 $1,301.40
LAKEVIEW WINTERLAK DR SHOREVIEW PL Local 85 68 Slurry 335 25 8375 $2,459.79
LANDMARK CUL•DE•SA 72 NO AV Lou! 83 66 Slurry 750 25 18750 $5,507.00
LAUREN ESSEX DR 135 TH AV Local 90 73 Slurry 155 25 18875 (5,543.71
LAURMOUNT rUL•DE•SA SNORE DR Local 90 73 Slurry 405 25 10125 $2,973.78
LEWIS CUL•DE•SA 95 TH AV Local 81 64 Slurry 420 25 10500 $3,083.92
LOCUST 72 NDAV END Local 90 73 Slurry 615 25 15375 $4,515.74
LOLA SHADY Pl. CUL-DE•SA Local 92 75 Slurry 620 25 15500 $4,552.45
LYNN 121 ST AV 116 TH AV Lou] 85 68 Slurry 982 25 24550 $7,210.50
MARLYN CULDE•SA 96 IN AV Local 83 66 Slurry 270 25 6750 $1,982.52
MARION 124 IN AV 121 ST AV Local 87 70 Slurry 1270 25 31750 59.325.19
MARTHA COPPER CR DR COPPER CA OR Local 85 68 Slurry 175 25 4375 $1,284.97
MARTHA 93 RD AV 92 NO AV Local 83 66 Slurry 410 25 10250 $1,010.49
MATTHEW PARK END BI ST AV Local 90 73 Slurry 350 25 8750 $2.569.93
MCFARLAND VISTA VIE CT CLOUD CT Local 100 83 Slurry 935 25 23375 $6,86540
MCFARLAND CLOUD CT BULL MOUN RD Lout as 71 Slurry 771 25 19275 $5,661.20
MCKENZIE GRANT AV PACIFIC HW Local 85 68 Slurry 715 25 17875 $5,250.01
MEADOWWOOD WOODCREST AV WOODCREST AV Locat 90 73 Slurry 595 25 14875 $4,368.89
MILLEN MILLEN/94 CT 93 RD AV Local 83 66 Slurry 315 25 7875 $2,312.94
MLLVIEW SUMMERCRE DR CUL•DE•SA Local 83 66 Slurry 875 25 21875 $6,424.83
MIRA MOTH AV CUL.DE.SA Lou) 90 73 Slurry 515 25 12875 $3,781.47
MORNING HILL WESTSURYTR 135 TH AV Local 85 68 Slurry 620 25 15500 (4,552.45
MOUNTAIN RIDGE 134 TM AV CULDE•SA Local 87 70 Blurry 495 25 12375 $3.634.62
MOUNTAIN VEW END END Local 100 83 Slurry 1020 25 25500 27 ,489.52
MURDOCK 109 TH AV 106 TH AV Loca l 85 ass. lrry 710 25 17750 55,213.29
MURDOCK 97 TH AV END foul 90 73 Slurry 465 25 11625 $3,414.34
OAK 90 IN AV 87 TH AV Local 85 68 Slurry 1165 25 29125 38.554.21
OAK MEADOW/92ND END OAK MEADO LN Lou! 85 68 Scurry IDO 25 2500 273427
OAK MEADOW/91ST END OAK MEADO LN Local 85 68 Slurry 100 25 2500 $734.27
OAK MEADOW ALDERBROO DR ALDERBROO CA Local 90 73 Slurry 1150 25 28750 28.444.07
OAKHILL ALDERBROO DR CULOE•SA Loca: 90 73 Slurry 915 25 22875 $6,718.54
OAKS 98 TH AV END Local 95 78 Slurry 330 25 8250 $2423.08
PE S ROOK 100 TH AV 97 TH AV Local as 71 Slurry 960 25 24000 $7,048.96
PENN CUL•DE'SA 115 TH AV Local 85 68 Slurry 425 25 10625 $3,120.63
PINEBROOK CULDE•SA 99 TH AV Local 80 63 Stuny 310 25 7750 $2,276.23
REDWOOD 72 NO AV CUL•DE.SA Local 95 78 Slurry 865 25 21625 26,351.41
REILING 92 ND AY BB IN AV Local 93 76 Slurry 1255 25 31375 $9.215.05
SANDBURG 72 NO AV 72 NO AV Local 90 73 Slurry 630 25 15750 $4,625.88
SCHECKLA REILING ST 89 TH CT Local 90 73 Slurry 480 25 12000 $3,524.48
SCHOLLWOOD CUL•DE-SA HAZELWOOD LP Local 87 70 Slurry 317 25 7925 $2,327.63
SERENA GRIMSON CT WOODCREST AV Local 83 66 Slurry 690 25 17250 f5,0E6.I4
SHADY SHADY LN SHADY LN Local 91 74 Starry 1155 25 28875 $8,400.78
SHADY 74 TH AV SHADY LN Local 90 73 Slurry 370 25 9250 $2,716.79
SHADY SHADY CT CUL.DE.SA Lou! 77 60 Slurry 210 25 5250 $1,541.96
SHEFFIELD BRITTANY OR BRITTANY OR Local 90 73 Scurry 1040 25 26000 (7,638.30
SHORE MORNING H DR WINTERLAK OR Local 90 73 Slurry 1325 25 33125 $9,72904
SHOREVIEW LAKEVIEW TE CUL•DE.SA Local 85 68 Slurry 620 25 15500 Sass 45
SNOW BRUSH CUI.DE SA SUMMER LA DR Lou: 92 75 Slurry 530 25 13250 53,891.61
SPRINGWOOD CUL.DE.SA 121 ST AV Local 85 68 Slurry 275 25 6875 $2.01923
SPRUCE 74 TH AV 71 ST AV Laul 84 67 S:urry 970 25 24250 $7,122.39
$2,055.95
STARDUST NORTHVIEW DR LIVEN DR Local 90 73 Slurry 128733 r 25 25 4]325 7000 $12,724.84
STARVIEW END 130 TH AV Local 90 73 Slurry
STEVE &N RD AY 83 RD AV Local 91 74 Slurry 255 25 6375 $1,872.38
STRATFORD 87 TH AV CUL•DE.SA Lou: 86 69 Slurry 430 25 10750 $3,157.35
STRATFORD 88 TH AV 88 TH AV Local 90 73 Slurry 1020 26 26500 57,489,52
SUMMERCREST 121 S7 AV TIGARD DR Lou] 85 68 Slurry SSS 25 13875 $4,075.18
SUMMER LAKE SNOW BRAS CT SCHOLLS F RD Loca[ 90 73 Slurry 1780 25 44500 $13.069.95
SUMMER SUMMERCRE OR 121 ST AV Local as 68 Slurry 890 25 22250 56,574.98
SWENDON ASHBURYLN ASHBURYLN Local 90 73 Slurry 2392 25 34800 $10,220.99
TALLWOOD BLUESTEM LN ASHBURY LN Local 100 63 Slurry 1225 25 30625 $8,994.77
TANGELA END 92 NO AV Local 90 73 Slurry 120 25 3000 $581.12 $627,519
Sub Total $627,548.51
En9lnaarin[ 6 Admin•10%, $62,754 85
Slurry Colt-SO 293/s.f. Total
Accumulatad Ramona Total $513,476.87
APPENDIX A-2
Pala A2 7
fY 2017.2016
Road Name Llmlts from To CIIaalllcaton 1999 PCI 2017 ►CI RKOMMAKI Action PrLlerl$M Width Area (Lt.) Cal
TIGARD TIEDEMAN AV PACIFIC NW N41gn'd Route 100 92 Reconalruction 3191 30 95730 (665,839.76
TGARD PACIFIC HW MAIN ST Loci 91 73 R*tonHruction 156 30 4740 $33,%6.85 $719,799
TIMOTHY CUL•DE•SA 115 TH AV Local 83 65 Slurry 264 25 6600 $1,9% ,62
TIPPITT END 121 ST AV Local 91 73 Slurry 600 25 15000 $4,537.77
TTAN 108 TH AV 104 TH AV Local 93 75 Slurry 1045 25 26125 $7,903.28
TWIN PARK TIGARD ST CUL•DE•SA Loral 85 67 Slurry 360 25 9000 $2.722.68
VENUS GENESIS LP CUL•DE•SA Local 97 69 Slurry 470 25 11760 (7,554.69
VEW VIEW TR CUL•01-SA Lout % 12 Slurry 190 25 4750 (1,436.%
VIEW CUL•DE•SA CULDE•SA Local 90 70 Sturry 940 20 235W $7,109.17
VIEW 100 TH AV 94 TH CT Local 100 92 Slurry 1110 25 21750 $8,794.67
VEW 93 RD AV 92 NO AV Loca l 67 69 Slurry 525 25 13125 $3,970.55
VEWCREST CUL•DE•SA ASPINE RI DR local 65 67 Slurry 615 25 17625 (4,121.81
VIEWMWNT 114 TH AV CUL•DE•SA Local 91 73 Slurry 605 25 15125 $4,575.58
VILLAGE GLENN FREWINO ST ASH AV Local 91 75 Slurry 1290 25 32250 $9,756.20
VILLAGE PARK 129 TH PL 126 TH AV Local % 72 Slurry 360 25 9000 52,722.66
VISTAVIEW MCFARLAND BL CULDE•SA Local 85 57 Slurry 270 25 6750 $2.042.00
WEST0.IOOE ESSEX DR 135 TH AV Local 90 72 Slurry 870 25 21750 $6.579.77
WILDWOOD/1 ISTH WILDWOOD ST CUL•DE•SA Local 65 67 Slurry 158 25 3950 fl,l%.%
WILDWOOD WILDWOODST CUL•DE-SA Local 90 72 Slurry 260 25 6500 (1,966.37
WILDWOOD VISTA VIE CT MCFARLAND BL Loci 93 75 Slurry 1485 25 ]7125 $11,230.99
WLLOVAYOOD WTTONWOO LN CULAE•SA Local 86 68 Slurry 470 25 11750 $3.554.39
WILLS CUL-DE•SA 127 TH AV Local 60 62 Slurry 370 SS 9250 32.798.29
WILTON LIDEN DR WALNUT ST Local 90 72 Slurry 150 25 3750 $1,134.44
WNDSOR 105 TH AV CUL•DE-SA Loca l 87 69 Scurry 340 25 8500 $2,571.40
VANDSONG WALNUT LN NORTHVIEW DR Local 65 67 Slurry 1070 25 26750 16,092.76
WINDSOR 106 TH AV CULDE•SA Lou: 00 72 Slurry 110 25 11000 $3,327.70
WOODLAWN CUL-DE•SA 115 TH AV Local 85 67 Slurry 413 25 10375 $3.1]8.82
103RD MURDOCK ST MCOONALD ST Lau: % 77 Slurry 2020 25 50500 $15,277.16
104 TH KENT ST KNUCKLE Local 90 72 Slurry 1115 25 27875 It 432.69
104 TH PICKS Wy DURHAM RD Lout 85 67 Slurry 430 25 10750 $3,252.07
100 TH END KABLE ST Local 85 67 Slurry 225 25 5625 $1,701.66
104 TH MCDONALD ST HILLVIEW ST Local 92 74 Slurry 400 25 10000 $3,025.1!1
955 25 23875 57,222.62
106TH DEL MONTE DR CANTERBUR LN Local 95 17 Slurry
106TH WINDSORCT CUL•DE•SA Local 90 72 Scurry 305 25 7625 $2,3%.70
106 TH CITY LIMI CLYDESDAL PL Local 85 87 Slurry 150 25 3750 51,134
106TH CLYDESDAL PL CLYDESDAL CT Lou[ 83 65 Slurry 365 25 9125 $2,760.48
I%TH CLYDESDAL CT TIEDEMAN AV Loral 85 67 Slurry 165 25 4125 53,247.89
107 TH CUL•DE•SA FOHNER ST Lou: 84 66 Slurry 1260 2S 31500 19.529.32
109 TH HIGHLAND OR NAEVE ST Local 85 67 Slurry 395 25 9875 $2.987.36
109 TIi NAEVE ST END Lou; 84 66 Slurry 662 25 16550 (5,006.67
109TH NORTH DAK ST BLACK CIA WY Loral SW 82 Slurry 1055 25 26375 $7,978.91
109TH CUL•DE-SA CHATEAU LN Local 85 67 Slurry 140 25 3500 53,058.81
117 TH FONNER ST CUL•DE•SA Lout 85 67 Slurry 610 25 15250 54.613.40
112 TH PACIFIC HW GAARDE ST Laul 65 67 Slurry 1485 23 37125 $11,230.98
113 TH CITY LIMI DURHAM RD Local el 63 Slurry 650 25 16500 $4,991.55
113 TH CULDE*SA DAWNS CT Local 62 64 Slurry 390 25 9750 •2,949.55
113 TH DAWNSCT TIGARD ST Local 85 67 Slurry 630 25 15750 $4.764.66
114 TH VIEWMOUNT LN FAIRHAVEN ST Local 92 74 Slurry 980 25 24500 $7,411.69
114 TH SUMMERFIE DR CULDE-SA Local 85 67 Slurry 340 25 8500 $2.571./0
114 TH 115 TH AV WALNUT ST Loral 85 67 Slurry 890 25 22250 56,731.02
116 TM WALNUT ST ANN ST Local 83 65 Slurry 380 25 9500 52,973.92
118TH LYNN ST KATHERINE ST Local 85 67 Slurry 650 25 16250 $4,915.92
119 TH NORTH OAK ST MANZANITA ST Loca l 90 72 Slurry 678 25 16950 $5,127.68
122 NO WALNUT ST END Lou; 90 72 Slurry 350 25 8750 $2.647.03
124 TM MARION ST END Loca l 93 75 Slurry 685 25 17125 55,180.62
124 TT" WALNUT ST BROOK CT Local 91 73 Slurry 1060 25 26500 $8,016.73
124 H NORTH DAN ST CUL•DE-SA Loral 90 72 Slurry 270 25 6750 52,042.00
125TH KAREN ST KATHERINE ST Local 90 72 Scurry 600 25 15000 $4,537.77
125 TH CULOE-SA WINTERLAK OR Local 85 67 Slurry 705 25 17625 $5,331.88
129TH BULL MOUN RD BIRDSVIEW ST Local 85 67 Slurry 380 25 9500 $2.873.92
129 TH CUL•DE.SA FALCON RI CT Local 90 72 Slurry 240 25 6000 51,815.u
25
129TH CUL•DE•SA WNTERIAK CT local 90 72 Slurry 695 25 17375 $5,2 2:6 6 .25
129TH CUL•DE SA IV: TERLAK CT Lou: 90 72 Scurry 695 25 17375 (5,
133 RD END 132 NO AV Local 90 72 Slurry 600 25 15000 $4,537.77
133 RD 132 ND AV BENISH ST Local 85 67 Slurry 1150 25 28750 $8.697.39
133 RD SHEFFIELD CR END Local 90 72 Slurry 115 25 2875 $869.74
133 RD CUL•DE•SA BRITTANY DR Loca l 90 72 Slurry 250 25 6250 $1,890.74
134 TM 133 RD AV BEHISH ST Local 85 67 Scurry 640 25 16000 $4,84029
134 TM 133 RD AV MOUNTAIN CT Local 90 72 Scurry 1405 25 35125 $10,625.94
134 TH SHEFFIELD CR CUL.DE-SA Local 90 72 Slurry 180 25 4500 $1,361.33
136 TH CUL'DE•SA WESTRIDGE TE Local 90 72 Slurry 635 25 15875 $4.802.47
66 TH CUL•DE-SA OAK ST Local 100 82 Slurry 175 25 4375 $1.323.52
69TH CLINTON ST ATLANTA ST Local 97 79 Slurry 865 25 21625 $6,541.95
69TH PINE ST OAK S7 Local 100 82 Slurry 560 25 14000 $4.235.25
69 TH CULDE-SA TAYLORS F RD Local 100 82 Slurry 1700 25 42500 $12,857.01
70TH OAK ST END Local 100 82 Slurry 515 25 12875 53.994.92
70TH 69 TH AV TAYLORS F RD Local 100 82 Slurry 1420 25 35500 $10,739.39
76 TH DURHAM RD BOND ST Local 100 82 Slurry 690 25 17250 $5,218.43
76 TH END ASHFORD ST Local 100 82 Slurry 440 25 13000 $3,327.70
76 TH END END Local 93 75 Slurry 280 25 7CDO $2,117.63
76 TH SPRUCE ST SPRUCE ST Local 95 77 Slurry 106 25 2650 5801.67 $373,179
Sub Total $1,092,977.18
Engineering d Admin-30%, $109,297.72
Slurry Cast-$0.3025/s.1. Reconstruction-27.164/31. Total
Accumulated Reserve Total $111,202.97
FY 2018.2019
Road Name Llmlta From To ClaaalRCaton 1999 PCI 2038 PCI Recommend Action PrL:ength Width Area 0.0 Coat
79TH PFAFFLE ST THORN ST Local 100 el Slurry 1245 25 31125 $9.698.35
BOTH BOND ST CHURCHILL WY Local 100 81 Slurry 290 25 7250 $2,259.05
80 TH END END Local 10n RI Slurry 440 25 11000 53,427.53
BOTH FANNOCR E DR CUL•DF.SA Loctl 93 74 Slurry "0 75 `^"0 53,9/2.82
BOTH CULDESA FANNO CRE DR Local 95 76 Slurry 775 25 19375 $6,037.12
81 ST ASHFORD ST ROSS ST Loral 100 81 Slurry IDS 25 25125 57,828.79
BI ST ROSS ST BONITA RD Local 100 81 Slurry 1880 25 47000 211,644.89
81 ST CUL•DE-SA BOND ST Local 95 76 Slurry 295 25 7375 52,298.00
$I Slurry 555 25 13875 $4,323,36
82 NO PATTIE LN LANOTREE ST local 100
82 ND PFAFFLE ST END Local 100 81 Slurry 910 25 20250 $6,309.77
82ND STEVE ST CUL DE-SA Local 100 81 Slurry 317 25 7925 $2,469.38
82 NO ASHFORD ST END Local 97 78 Slurry 600 25 15000 $4,673.%
83 RD END LAMANCHA CT Loral 93 74 Slurry 125 25 3125 (973.73
83 0.D LAMANCHA CT LAMANCHA CT Local 93 7A Slurry 250 25 8250 $1,947.46
83 RD MURDOCK ST CULOE-SA Local 93 74 Slurry 415 25 10375 $3,232.70
83RD CULDE•SA BONITA RD Loral 100 81 Slurry 580 25 14500 (4.518.11
84TH LANGTREE ST ASHFORD ST Local 100 81 Slurry 245 25 6125 (1,908.51
84 TH KENTON DR END Local 100 BI Slurry 150 23 3750 $1,168.48
e4 TH MURDOCK ST CUL•DE•Sl1 Loral 95 76 Slurry 410 25 10250 $3,193.83
190 25 4750 31,480.07
84 TH BONAVENTU LN CULDE-SA Lccal 100 81 Slurry
' LIMI Loral 95 76 Slurry 605 25 15125 $4.712.85
ITY
85TH CITY LIMI CU
87TH DURHAM RD HAMLET ST Local 95 76 Slurry 920 25 23000 17,166.65
87TH END BELLFLOWE LN Lou: 100 81 Slurry 76 25 1900 2592.0]
87TH OAK ST LOCUST ST Local 100 81 Slurry 780 25 19500 (6,076.07
88TH DURHAM RD SATTLER ST foul 100 81 Slurry 1802 25 45030 (14,037.29
APPENDIX A•2
P.C. A2 0
88 TH END END Local 100 81 Slurry 355 25 8875 52,765.!9
90TH END END Local 100 e! Slurry !S5 25 8375 $2.609.60
90 TH OAK ST LOCUST ST Local 100 81 Slurry 1190 25 29750 $9,259.91
91S T LINCOLN AV GREENBURG RE Local 100 81 Slurry 760 25 19000 $5,920.28
92 NO SATTLER ST INEZ BY Local 100 81 Slurry 1815 25 45375 $14,138.55
92ND INEZ ST VIEW TR Loin 93 74 Slurry 225 25 5625 $1,752.71
92 NO MAPLELEAF ST LOCUST ST Local 100 at Slurry 370 25 9250 $2,682.24
93RD MARTHA ST CUL-DE-SA Lou: 95 76 Slurry 264 25 6600 $2,056,52
94TH LAKESIDE DR END Local 100 81 Slurry 270 25 6750 $2,103.26
94 TH GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RE Local 95 74 Slurry 480 25 32000 $3.739.12
95 TH COMMERCIA ST GREENBURG RE Local 100 81 Slurry 1535 25 36375 $11,957.40
97 T14 LAKESIDE DR CUL•DE•SA Local 95 76 Slurry 100 25 2500 $778.98
97114 OAKS LN CULOE•SA Local 95 76 Slurry 120 25 3000 $934.78
97TH CUL•DE•SA ELROSE ST Local 100 81 Slurry 316 25 7900 $2,461.59
ALFRED 69TH AV VENTURA CT Local 100 81 Slurry 850 25 21250 $6,621.36
AM ES CHANDLER DR 121 SI. AV Local 97 78 Slurry 680 25 17000 $5,297.09
ASN HILL ST ENO Local 93 76 Slurry 55 25 1925 $412.86
ASH COMMERCIA ST COMMERCIA ST Local 100 81 Slurry 165 25 4125 $1,285.32
ASHBURY TALLWOOD OR WILTON AV Local 100 81 Slurry 520 25 13000 $4,050.72
ASHFORD 84 TH AV 81 ST AV Local 95 76 Slurry 550 25 13750 $4,284.41
ASHFORD THURSTON DR 79THAV Local 95 76 Slurry 210 25 5250 $1,635.87
AVON 87 TH AV HALL 9, Local 94 75 Slurry 620 25 15500 $4,829.70
SAMBI 116 TH AV 115 TH AV Local 97 78 Slurry 230 25 5250 $1,635.87
BARBARA 74 TH AV VENTURA CT Local 100 81 Slurry 1215 25 30375 $9,454.65
BELL 127 TH AV CUL-DE-SA Local 100 81 Slurry 565 25 14125 $4,401.26
BELLFLOWER END REILING ST Local 100 81 Slurry 1191 25 29775 $9,277.70
BENCHVIEW CUL-DE-SA SENCHVIEW TA Local 100 81 Slurry 264 25 6600 $2,056.52
BLACK DIAMOND 111 THAV PONDEROSA PL Local 100 81 Slurry 795 25 19875 $6,192.92
BLACKDIAMOND PONDEROSAPL 106 TH AV Local 100 81 Slurry 670 25 16750 $51219.19
BONANZA RIVERWOOD LN RIVERWOOD LN Local 100 at Slurry 700 25 17500 $5,452.89
SONAVENTURE END 82 NO AV Local 100 81 Slurry 630 25 15750 54,907.60
BOND 8t ST CT 79 TH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 860 25 21500 $6,699.26
BOND 79THAV 76 TH AV Lord IDD 81 Slurry 665 25 16625 $5,180.24
BOUNEFF MORNING HDR 131 ST AV Local 97 78 Slurry 485 25 12125 53,778.07
BRAESURN END REILING ST Local 100 81 Slurry 725 25 18125 $5,647.63
COLONY COLONY OR CUL•DE'SA Local 100 81 Slurry 290 25 7250 $2,259.05
BURNHAM CUL-DE-SA HILL ST Local 95 76 Slurry 220 25 5500 $1,713.76
CARMEN CITY LIMI 116 TH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 115 25 2875 $895.83
CENTER 95 TH AV 95 TH AV Local 1C0 81 Slum/ 280 25 7000 $2,181.15
CHANDLER AMES RD 121 ST AV Local 97 78 Slurry 950 25 23750 $7,400.35
CHELSEA OMARA ST OMARA ST Local 94 75 Slurry 1200 25 30000 $9,347.80
CHERRY 72 NO AV 74 TH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 340 25 8500 $2,648.54
CHICKORY CUL-DE-SA SUMMER LA CT Local 94 75 Slurry 335 25 8375 52,609.60
CHURCHILL 80 TH AV CUL-DE-SA Local 100 81 Slurry 480 25 12000 $3,739.12
CLINTON 70 TH AV 69 TH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 264 25 6600 $2,056.52
CORAL GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RE Local 100 81 Slurry 450 25 11250 $3,505.43
CORTW4D END NO NAME OR Local 3TA 83 Slurry 100 25 2500 $778.98
DAWN CUL-DE-SA 92 NO AV Local 100 81 Slurry 220 25 5500 $1,713.76
DEL MONTE 106 TH AV 103 RD AV Local 100 81 Scurry 720 25 18000 $5,608.68
DERRY DELL PARK ST PARK ST Local 94 75 Slurry 430 25 10750 $3,349.63
DOVER CUL-DE-SA 108 TH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 300 25 7500 $2,336.95
ELISE CULDE•SA 303 RD AV Local 100 81 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1,791.66
ELMHURST 69 TH AV 68 TH PW Local 97 78 Slurry 175 25 6875 $2,142.21
ELROSE 98 TH AV 97 TH AV Local 100 01 Slurry 485 25 12125 $3,778.07
ERROL END 116 TH AV Local 97 78 Slurry 100 25 2500 $778.98
ERROL END FONNER ST Local 100 81 Slurry 1450 25 36250 $11,295.26
ESCHMAN WINTERLAKCT HAWKS SEA ST Local 100 81 Slurry 375 25 9375 $2,921.19
EYEBROW STRATFORD LP ENO Local 95 76 Slurry 130 25 3250 $1,012.68
FAIRHAVEN 115 TH AV CULDE•GA Local 95 76 Slurry 910 25 22750 $7,088.75
FAIRHAVEN 310 TH AV FAIRHAVEN ST Local 93 74 Slurry 1190 25 29750 $9,269.91
FERN END JENSHIRE LN Local 100 81 Slurry 1260 25 31500 $9,815.19
FIR 72 NO AV 72 NO AV Local 100 Ol Slurry 235 25 5875 $1,830.61
FIR 74 TH AV FIR LP Local too 81 Slurry 551 25 13775 $4,292.20
FRANKLIN 69 TH AV 68 TH AV Local 100 111 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1,791.66
FREWING PACIFIC HW PACIFIC HW Local 95 76 Slurry 686 25 17150 55,343.83
GARDEN GARDEN PL PACIFIC HW Local too 81 Slurry 739 25 18475 $5,756.69
GENESIS 115 TH AV AMBIANCE PL Local 100 81 Slurry 610 25 15250 $4,751.80
GENESIS CITY LIMI 115 TH AV Local 100 81 Slurry 30 25 750 $233.70
GENEVA 111 TH AV 109 TH AV Local 100 81 Slurry 515 25 12875 $4,013.77
GENTLEWDODS ASHFORD ST 97 TH AV Local 93 74 Slurry 740 25 18500 55,764 .48
GRAVENS71EM END NO NAME DR Local 300 83 Slurry 100 25 2500 $778.98
GREENSWARD 90 T14 AV 86 THAV Local 100 81 Slurry 1105 25 27625 58,607.77
HAMLET STRATFORD LP HALL BL Local 100 81 Slurry 1470 25 36750 $11,451.06
HAWKS BEARD 131ST PL 130 TH AV Local 97 78 Slurry 490 25 12250 $3,817.02
HEIDI CUL-DE' SA 92 ND AV Local 100 81 Slurry 185 25 4625 $1,441.12
HILL CUL-DE-SA HILL ST Local 95 76 Slurry 215 25 5375 $1,674.81
HILLVIEW/103RD CUL DE-SA HILLVIEW ST Local 93 74 Slurry 160 25 4000 $1,246.37
HILLVIEW 104TH AV ASH AV Local 95 76 Slurry 992 25 24800 $7,727.52
INEZ 100 TH AV END Local 95 76 Slurry 470 25 11750 $3,661.22
INEZ 92 ND AV END Local 93 74 Slurry 265 25 6625 $2,064.31
IANZEN CULDE-SA 98 TH CT Local 100 81 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1,791.66
JEFFERSON LOCUST ST LOCUST ST Local 100 81 SI-Y 200 25 5000 $1,557.97
JENNA ESSEX DR CUL-DE-SA Local 97 78 Slurry 390 25 9750 $3,038.04
JOHNSON 106 TH AV END Local 100 81 Slurry 365 25 9125 $2,843.29
KABLE CULDE-SA 72 NO AV Local 100 Bl Slurry 550 25 13750 $4,284.43
KAROL CUL-DE-SA KATHERINE ST Local 100 81 Slurry 317 25 7925 52,469.38
KATHERINE/123RD KATHERINE ST KATHERINE ST Local 100 81 Slurry 106 25 2650 $325.72
KENT 103 RD AV CULDE-SA Local 1G0 81 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1,791.66
KENTON END ASHFORD ST Local 100 Bl Slurry 1660 25 41500 $12,931.13
LADY MARION END 100 THAV Local 95 76 Slurry 1385 25 34625 $10,711
Sub Total $501,260.44
Engineering 6 Admin•30%. 550,126. 04
Slurry Cost-$0,31 I5/s.1. Total
Accumulated Reserve Total $359,815.49
FY 2019.2020
Road Name Llmlle From To CtaaaiRcaton 1999 PCI 2019 PCI Recommend Action PrLiength Width Area (s.IJ Cost
TIEDEMAN TICARD ST GREENBURG RE NeiRlYd Route 95 75 -Reconstruction 1291 30 38730 $294,372.03 $294,172
LAKE END VILLAGE G DR Local 95 75 Slurry 200 25 5000 $3,604.71
LAKESIDE 98 TH AV ALDERBROO OR Local 700 80 Slurry 1105 25 27825 $8,866.00
LAMANCHA CULDE~SA 83 RD AV Local 95 75 Slurry 400 25 10000 $3,209.41
LANDAU LANDAU ST CULDE-SA Local 95 75 Slurry 750 25 18750 $6,017.65
LANGTREE HALL BL END Local 100 80 Slurry 785 25 19625 $6,298.47
LANSDOWNE CUL•DE-SA TIPPITT PL Local 97 77 Slurry 950 25 23750 $7,622.36
LEHMAN GREENBURG RD GREENBURG RE Local 100 80 Slurry 375 25 9375 S3,IX+8.82
LESLIE CUL-DE-SA 92 NO AV Local 100 80 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1.845.41
LIDEN CHEHALEM CT WILTON AV Lr-al 97 77 Slurry 1480 25 37000 $11,674.83
LINCOLN COMMERCIA ST GREENBURG RE Local 100 80 Slurry 1495 25 37375 $11,995.18
LINCOLN MAPLEtEAF ST LOCUST ST Local 100 80 Slurry 370 25 9250 $2,968.71
LODI END REILING ST Lou] 100 80 Sturry 717 25 17925 $5,752.87
LONDON 98 TH AV LONDON CT Local 97 77 Slurry 220 25 5500 $1,765.18
MAPLELEAF 72 ND AV 71 ST AV Local 300 80 Slurry 230 25 5750 $1,845.41
MARCIA NORTHVIEW DR 139 TH AV Lout 97 77 Slurry 390 25 9750 $3,129.18
MARIE 128 TH AV CULDE-SA Local 100 80 Slurry 264 25 6600 52,118.21
MAZAMA NAEVE ST CUL-DE-SA Local 100 80 Slurry 215 25 5375 $1,723.06
APPENDIX A-2
Page A29
Ell
9
Y ~SrrrN~rrrrrr 000 FSS«« ti-1 ~1-rNNNNNNNNAAA 9Vd9VVV ;
se wrr$$$PP.~&$R&Errg
$ CC NZ~ a- NN~wr
m~~ Fey yZ ~~O O ~ py~ SS22
zZ2 y1 ~ ~
N
P
2
ZZCg7ga0 izn~Pii=fmcQRomC~w{cy'Pwyi=z~f'nn"i`cc~~=oymg`cc~g ~gPyByYa°+=G~~L$yQ~~~~Ac
>Z3> °Cy3mmt Sm p>200i`Qx~p'OODp)SOA 22SS ~Ty m2a mgm°0(/01%aTo
yUO 2Qp~ y~1 ym1 ~FO'SZOOOgA gA'zCSmp"~q°nyxq
Tj2 CO>yJCti -Iyy~t -NISO <>~<~ <<Dy<>'1~D<< <>>>AY<<<<>>yG y~><~y
c OpL 2< a 3S
HT go ~0~~~Bog~P~yq~q(=POD`-'~zm`q=$m=g«-~4a="eS~e~mg~~88~~:Ngmaa~m~gggg=o~`zP~yYYy~++fg€2'
~'~°N>cyt~ '^;~°cX~z °>~O~OS>m~°~m~°n>a>mmm~.o°y1°~ y~r3r
rr 3f (q/~ 33ii y~ VV y y~ y~ N y~ g q~ yR1
5Ci° ti
NN- a Z H sY - a p N < ° O < < p a G A < < > r > A N < < < > < _ > Y G > < N ~ Z~ > P Y
O~ ~ a y r i y ~ p V~ p a s 9 Cep A L ~ m p~ ~
03 gggg g€ g€ €g g g-----g---------
A
2
2
v
_p p__-- ~p p_p~p p_ ~p p_ ~p ~p ppp_p_ pp ~p p~pp ~p ~p p~pppppppppppp p p
SOSVOOOOWSOOOOOOOOWN00410UNWOYWIAWtAWW0000SSVVO0YY~11~80SwwYSS011~0000000PO0YVOS0
7
~ ((oo q p~ po
~ O O V V S S S S W O S S S O S S S S P P S O P S P P W S W Y P P P P P S S S S S S V V S S P P P► S S P P Y S S E P~ 8 S$ S S S P S S g V S V S
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN41 Y1NNNNNfIINCNNNC LIi LIlNNNNN~i SIC NNN~e ~I~NNN~I~NLIINNLnN LA N(P YIi NNNNN
~33~333.33z33333333~3333333333~3z333~33~3~3~33~3~33~3.~3~3~33~33~33~a3~~333
3 °b
M
VYNNOOP010wSP1ANOMOOPO SOPiKuNS 0. .0. POUYI OSOOSY~q'BV~b"... cc R. ...cc.
ti N
1 C `c
r _NwuuuwNUUUUUUUUUUUUWUU;u~uNUwuuuNwuwwaNuuNUUUUNMN.uwwuawSCuuuw:auuu0uwaaoou"doa
3
a
NPVWNN aa r ~p mm q Nuq ~y r Nrq!)r r q
N
y~QJVry~WN$ Nm PWrNrNr rrgVVrSp VV 1pPy1~~ 1pNp~~YpYN~i Y5~ QVwv r~jp rp r rYYP ggprg ~PYYYy~y~ Ss N NpO0
SSSP ONw OPSSBSP PPYNiSN22 9 8SHN SVgS.S S95H SHE. Sb'SPP`~$2SuPwPpONpq~PPPOSP
q~P pNmm qN ~l~pp~~VrUgYU.11NW 8W ~gNnqpN pNw PO pNWW WVW~fmPNmy NpWN NO1~ppNp~~p~ppp pprpp ~N~..Y Pqu yup~ AV~gp~p+N.~•oS EYrPy~~gp~q~pPY~~Y~i yY NYppNp~~tpp~p~p8~r~gVq~yy (yYy(~~puOpiYNWeywey S~rr~~jjup
~VWONNrSaVPOI Oe(OVP00~r►~0"OOIN110 tD iV,NNVUPtV,N~O I110ASYNgUUB+PYOOYYNSNVNNYNwP~SOPPYNPV
a u$.raue~omFiiBiR'~~v~avugi~~o~XuPi~ig::3'o"~uur.~dn°~u..mPooPw.`4iin.•~8u'P..rio~u~8i8gu~w4gi°vpFii~'iuro.>.-PY°YUOV.~•
S
Y
q
City of Tigard
Street Maintenance IFee Studg
Street Maintenance
DU,SF ACRE, %.0E
4
TRIPS/YEAR TOTAL DIRECT TOTAL RA
17E . ITS VFP' SC, _
TRIPS' C09T1YEAR CM Rariltrtit',,
Code Land.UseCategory, . TRIPS UNIT - CITYWIDE TRIPSIDAY 260 days
210 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 9.57 /DU/DAY 10,422 99,739 25,932,020 16.5% $132,241 16.5% 1.0574
220 MULTIFAMILY 6.63 /DU/DAY 6,400 42,432 11,032,320 7.0% $56,260 7.0% 0.7325
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 1(0 - 20 0.8651
120 General Heavy Industrial 1.50 /KSF/DAY 723,759 1,086 282,266 0.2% $7,513 0.9%
252 Congregate Care Facility 2.15 /DU/DAY 112 241, 62,608 0.0% $1,163 0.1%
151 Mini-Warehouse 2.50 /KSF/DAY 328,090 820 213,259 0.1% $3,406 0.4%
140 Manufacturing 3.82 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0%
311 All Suites Hotel 4.90 /DU/DAY 246 1,205 313,404 0.2% $2,554 0.3%
150 Warehousing 4.96 /KSF/DAY 31,898 158 41,135 0.0% $331 0.0%
864 To /Children's Superstore 4.99 /KSF/DAY 44,604 223 57,869 0.0% $463 0.1%
890 Furniture Store 5.06 /KSF/DAY 279,329 1,413 367,485 0.2% $2,900 0.4%
320 Motel 5.63 /DU/DAY 447 2,517 654,319 0.4% $4,640 0.6%
130 Industrial Park 6.96 /KSF/DAY 3,225,614 22,450 5,837,071 3.7% $33,485 42%
110 General Light Industrial 6.97 /KSF/DAY 3,219,359 22,439 5,834,122 3.7% $33,420 4.2%
310 Hotel 8.23 /DU/DAY 384 3,160 821,683 0.5% $3,986 0.5%
560 Church 9.11 /KSF/DAY 366,651 3,340 868,450 0.6% $3,806 0.5%
710 General Office 11.01 /KSF/DAY 3,313,850 36,485 9,486,227 6.0% $34,401 4.3%
522 Junior Hi 2h School 11.92 /KSF/DAY 232,605 2,773 720,888 0.5% $2,415 0.3%
520 Elements School 12.03 /KSF/DAY 371,802 4,473 1,162,923 0.7% $3,860 0.5%
610 530 High School 13.27 /KSF/DAY 231,782 3,076 799,693 0.5% $2,406 0.3%
Hospital 16.78 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0%
492 Racquet Club 17.14 /KSF/DAY 31,858 546 141,971 0.1% $331 0.0%
i Subtotals for Group 1 106,405 27,665,373 17.6% $141,081 17.6%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2 21 - 100) 4.9692
848 Tire Store 24.87 /KSF/DAY 67,269 1,673 434,976 0.3% $4,011 0.5%
630 Clinic' 31.45 /KSF/DAY 13,111 412 107,207 0.1% $782 0.1%
862 Home Improvement Su erstore 35.05 /KSFIDAY 250,084 8,765 2,279,015 1.5% $14,912 1.9%
817 Nurse Garden Center) 36.08 /KSF/DAY 13,897 501 130,364 0.1% $829 0.1%
720 Medical-Dental Office Building 36.13 /KSF/DAY 275,493 9,954 2,587,926 1.6% $16,428 2.1%
q 841 New Car Sales 37,50 /KSF/DAY 218,162 8,181 2,127,081 1.4% $13,009 1.6%
812 Buildin Materials and Lumber Store 39.71 /KSF/DAY 104,182 4,137 1,075,637 0.7% $6,212 0.8%
814 S ecial Retail Center 40.67 /KSF/DAY 685,461 27,878 7,248,202 4.6% $40,874 5.1%
861 Discount Club 41.80 /KSF/DAY 144,571 6,043 1,571,200 1.0% $8,621 1.1%
820 Sho in Center 42.92 /KSF/DAY 1,825,496 78,350 20,371,075 13.0% $108,854 13.6%
863 Electronics Superstore 45.04 /KSF/DAY 64,954 2,926 760,638 0.5% $3,873 0.5%
813 Free-Standing Discount Superstore 46.96 /KSF/DAY 141,530 6,646 1,728,030 1.1% $8,439 1.1%
816 Hardware/Paint Store 51.29 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0%
590 Libra 54.00 /KSF/DAY 13,006 702 182,604 0.1% $776 0.1%
815 Free-Standing Discount Store 56.63 /KSF/DAY 484,169 27,418 7,128,808 4.5% $28,871 3.6%
843 Automobile Parts Sales 61.91 /KSF/DAY 42,082 2,605 677,380 0.4% $2,509 0.3%
730 Government Office 68.93 /KSF/DAY 78,983 5,444 1,415,516 0.9% $4,710 0.6%
565 Da Care Center 79.26 /KSF/DAY 51;624 4,092 1,063,847 0.7% $3,078 0.4%
831 Quality Restaurant 89.95 /KSF/DAY 104,767 9,424 2,450,190 1.6% $6,247 0.8%
880 Pharmacy/Drugstore 90.06 /KSF/DAY 17,202 1,549 402,790 0.3% $1,026 0.1%
Subtotals for Grow 2 206,702 53,742,486 34.3% $274,062 34.3%
NON-RESIDENTIAL' GROUP 3 100 - X400 16.1521
732 Post Office 108.19 /KSF/DAY 21,487 2,325 604,416 0.4% $4,165 0.5%
850 Supermarket - 111.51 /KSF/DAY 305,121 34,024 8,846,254 5.6% $59,140 7.4%
832 Hi h-Tumover Sit Down Restaurant 130.34 /KSF/DAY 129,997 16,944 4,405,388 2.8% $25,197 3.1%
444 Movie Theater With Matinee (See Report) 375.92 /SC/DAY 12 4,511 1,172,870 0.7% $2,326 0.3%
844 Gasoline/Service Station (Avg. 844, 845,846) 161.39 NFP/DAY 130 20,981 5,454,982 3.5% $25,197 3.1%
912 Bank 265.21 /KSF/DAY 73,293 19,438 5,053,889 3.2% $14,206 1.8%
Subtotals for Group 3 98,222 25,537,800 16.3% $130,231 16.3%
n ,
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 4 >400) 62.0920
834 Fast-Food Restaurant 496.12 /KSF/DAY 63,787 31,646 8,227,975 5.2% $47,528 5.9%
851 Convenience Market (24-Hour) 737.99 /KSF/DRY 23,863 17,610 4,578,684 2.9% $17,780 2.2%
Subtotals for Group 4 49,256 12,806,659 8.2% $65,308 8.2%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 5 (SPECIAL) 02986
411 City Park 1.59 /AC/DAY 152 242 62,837 0.0% $545 0.1%
566 Cemetery 4.73 /AC/DAY 28 131 34,188 0.0% $100 0.0%
430 Golf Course 5.04 /AC/DAY 48 243 63,240 0.0% $173 0.0%
Subtotals for Group 5 616 160,265 0.1% $817 0.1%
TOTALS 603,373 156,876,922 100.0% $800,000 100.0%
Enter Revenue Desired: 800,000
Note: DU (DWELLING UNITS), SF (SQUARE FEET), ACRE (ACRES), VFP (VEHICLE FILL POINTS), SC (SCREENS) PAGE 1 OF 1
I:\ENG\GUS\StreetMaintenance Fee\New Maintenance Fees-2002.xis Appendix B-1 Date: 3/5/02
7,1
Cft of Tigard
' Street Maintenanee Fee Mudg
it()W illiaintmanes
" `XOF '
DU,SF;AGREe % OF,
" 1rE 1TE,, iiFP,SG; TRIPSIYEAr~ 'TOTAL DIRECT TOTAL RATEW
Code Land Use Category TRIPS U147 CIT5f1M1 OE TRIFFS!D~►Y 26O clays,: TRIPS ~:COST/YEAR COST Per !?nit
210 SINGLE FAMILY (DETACHED) 9.57 /DU/DAY 10,422 99,739 25,932,020 16.5% $44,631 16.5% 0.3569
220 MULTI FAMILY 6.63 /DU/DAY 6,400 42,432 11,032,320 7.0% $18,988 7.0% 0472
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 1 (r0 - 20 02920
120 General Heavy Industrial 1.50 /KSF/DAY 723,759 1,086 282,266 0.2% $2,536 0.9%
252 Congregate Care Facility 2.15 /DU/DAY 112 241 62,608 0.0% $392 0.1%
151 Mini-Warehouse 2.50 /KSF/DAY 328,090 820 213,259 0.1% $1,149 0.4%
140 Manufacturing 3.82 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0%
311 All Suites Hotel 4.90 /DU/DAY 246 1,205 313,404 0.2% $862 0.3%
150 Warehousing 4.96 /KSF/DAY 31,898 158 41,135 0.0% $112 0.0%
864 To /Children's Superstore 4.99 /KSF/DAY 44,604 223 57,869, 0.0% $156 0.1% _
890 Furniture Store 5.06 /KSF/DAY 279,329 1,413 367,485 0.2% $979 OA%
320 Motel 5.63 /DU/DAY 447 2,517 654,319 0.4% $1,566 0.6%
130 Industrial Park 6.96 /KSF/DAY 3,225,614 22,450 5,837,071 3.7% $11,301 4.2%
1i0 General Light Industrial 6.97 /KSF/DAY. 3,219,359 22,439 5,834,122 3.7% $11,279 4.2%
310 Hotel 8.23 /DU/DAY 384 3,160 821,683 0.5% $1,345 0.5%
560 Church 9.11 /KSF/DAY 366,651 3,340 868,450 0.6% $1,285 0.5%
710 General Office 11.01 /KSF/DAY 3,313,850 36,485 9,486,227 6.0% $11,610 4.3%
522 Junior High School 11.92 /KSF/DAY 232,605 2,773 720,888 0.5% $815 0.3%
a 520 Elements School 12.03 /KSF/DAY 371,802 4,473 1,162,923 0.7% $1,303 0.5%
530 Hi h School 13.27 /KSF/DAY 231,782 3,076 799,693 0.5% $812 0.3%
610 Hospital 16.78 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0%
492 Racquet Club 17.14 /KSF/DAY 31,858 546 141,971 0.1% $112 0.0%
" Subtotals for Group 1 106,405 27,665,373 17.6% $47,615 17.6%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2 21 - 100 1.6771
848 Tire Store 24.87 /KSF/DAY 67,269 1,673 434,976 0.3% $1,354 0.5%
630 Clinic 31.45 /KSF/DAY 13,111 412 107,207 0.1% $264 0.1%
862 Home Improvement Superstore, 35.05 /KSF/DAY 250,084 8,765 2,279,015 1.5°/a $5,033 1.9%
817 Nurse Garden Center 36.08 /KSF/DAY 13,897 501 130,364 0.1% $280 0.1%
720 Medical-Dental Office Building 36.13 /KSF/DAY 275,493 9,954 2,587,926 1.6% $5,544 2.1%
841 New Car Sales 37.50 /KSF/DAY 218,162 8,181 2,127,081 1.4% $4,391 1-6%
812 Building Materials and Lumber Store 39.71 /KSF/DAY 104,182 4,137 1,075,637 0.7% $2,097 0.8%
814 Specialty Retail Center 40.67 /KSF/DAY 685,461 27,878 7,248,202 4.6% $13,795 5.1%
861 Discount Club 41.80 /KSF/DAY 144,571 6,043 1,571,200 1.0% $2,910 1.1%
820 Shopping Center 42.92 /KSF/DAY 1,825,496 78,350 20,371,075 13.0% $36,738 13.6%
863 Electronics Superstore 45.04 /KSF/DAY 64,954 2,926 760,638 0.5% $1,307 0.5%
813 Free-Standing Discount Superstore 46.96 /KSF/DAY 141,530 6,646 1,728,030 1.1% $2,848 1.1%
816 Hardware/Paint Store 51.29 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0%
590 Libra 54.00 /KSF/DAY 13,006 702 182,604 0.1% $262 0.1%
815 Free-Standing Discount Store 56.63 /KSF/DAY 484,169 27,418 7,128,808 4.5% $9,744 3.6%
843 Automobile Parts Sales 61.91 /KSF/DAY 42,082 2,605, 677,380 0.4% $847 0.3%
730 Government Office 68.93 /KSF/DAY 78,983 5,444 1,415,516 0.9% $1,590 0.6%
565 Da Care Center 79.26 /KSF/DAY 51,624 4,092 1,063,847 0.7% $1,039 0.4%
831 Quality Restaurant 89.95 /KSF/DAY 104,767 9,424 2,450,190 1.6% $2,108 0.8%
880 Phamzacy/Drugstore 90.06 /KSF/DAY 17,202 1,549 402,790 0.3% $346 0.1%
Subtotals for Group 2 206,702 53,742,486 34.3% $92,496 34.3%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 3 100 - <400) 5.4513
732 Post Office 108.19 /KSF/DAY 21,487 2,325 604,416 0. $1,406 0.5%
5.66% % $,960 7.4%
850 Supermarket 111.51 /KSF/DAY 305,121 34,024 8,846,254 $8
832 High-Turnover Sit Down) Restaurant 130.34 /KSF/DAY 129,997 16,944 4,405,388 2.8% $8,504 3.1%
444 Movie Theater With Matinee See Report) 375.92 /SC/DAY 12 4,511 1,172,870 0.7% $785 0.3%
844 Gasoline/Service Station (Avg. 844, 845,846 161.39 NFP/DAY 130 20,981 5,454,982 3.5% $8,504 3.1%
912 Bank 265.21 /KSF/DAY 73,293 19,438 5,053,889 3.2% $4,795 1.8°k
Subtotals for Group 3 98,222 25,537,800 16.3% $43,953 16.3%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 4 (>400) 20.9560
834 Fast-Food Restaurant 496.12 /KSF/DAY 63,787 31,646 8,227,975 5.2% $16,041 5.9%
851 Convenience Market (24-Hour) 737.99 /KSF/DAY 23,863 17,610 4,578,684 2.9% $6,001 2.2%
Subtotals for Group 4 49,256 12,806,659 8.2% $22,041 8.2%
E s;
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 5 (SPECIAL) 0.1008
411 City Park 1.59 /AC/DAY 152 242 62,837 0.0% $184 0.1%
566 Cemetery 4.73 /AC/DAY 28 131 34,188 0.0% $34 0.0%
i 430 Golf Course 5.04 /AC/DAY 48 243 63,240 0.0% $58 0.0%
Subtotals for Group 5 616 160,265 0.1% $276 0.1%
TOTALS 603,373 156,876,922 100.0% $270,000 100.0%
Enter Revenue Desired: 270,000
1
Note: DU (DWELLING UNITS), SF (SQUARE FEET), ACRE (ACRES), VFP (VEHICLE FILL POINTS), SC (SCREENS) PAGE 1 OF 1
I:\ENG\GUS\Street Maintenance Fee\New Maintenance Fees-2002.x1s Appendix B-2 Date: 3/5/02
City of Tigard I
2freet Maintenanee Foo &%dg
Sidmmik Maintenanea
OU,3F,ACRE.
% ®F ®F
RE ITE VFP, SC, : TRIPS/YEA6t 61RECT N;f TD7 RAIMMO;'
Code Land Use CategoryTRIPS UNIT C
IT1'UUIDE' TRIPSIDA-Y days TRiPS„ COSTIVEAR arOST P'etUnit:
210 SINGLE FAMILY (DETACHED) 9.57 /DU/DAY 10,422 99,739 25,932,020 16.57$14,877 16.5% 0.1190
220 MULTI FAMILY 6.63 /DU/DAY 6,400 42,432 11,032,320 7.0% $6,329 7.0% 0.0824
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 1 (0 - 20) 0.0973
120 General Heavy Industrial 1.50 /KSF/DAY 723,759 1,086 282,266 0.2% $845 0.9%
252 Congregate Care Facility 2.15 /DU/DAY 112 241 62,608, 0.0% $131 0.1%
151 Mini-Warehouse 2.50 /KSF/DAY 328,090 820 213,259 01% $383 0.4%
140 Manufacturing 3.82 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0%
311 All Suites Hotel 4.90 /DU/DAY 246 1,205 313,404 0.2% $287 0.3%
150 Warehousing 4.96 /KSF/DAY 31,898 158 41,135 0.0% $37 0.0%
864 To /Children's Superstore 4.99 /KSF/DAY 44,604 223 57,869 0.0% $52 0.1%
890 Furniture Store 5.06 /KSF/DAY 279,329 1,413 367,485 0.2% $326 0.4%
320 Motel 5.63 /DU/DAY 447 2,517 654,319 0.4% $522 0.6%
130 Industrial Park 6.96 /KSF/DAY 3,225,614 22,450 5,837,071 3.7% $3,767 4.2%
110 General Light Industrial 6.97 /KSF/DAY 3,219,359 22,439 5,834,122 3.7% $3,760 4.2%
310 Hotel 8.23 /DU/DAY 384 3,160 821,683 0.5% $448 0.5%
560 Church 9.11 /KSF/DAY 366,651 3,340868,450 0.6% $428 0.5%
710 General Office 11.01 /KSF/DAY 3,313,850 36,485 9,486,227 6.0% $3,870 4.3%
522 Junior High School 11.92 /KSF/DAY 232,605 2,773 720,888 0.5% $272 0.3%
520 Elements School 12.03 /KSF/DAY 371,802 4,473 1,162,923 0.7% $434 0.5%
530 High School 13.27 /KSF/DAY 231,782 3,076 799,693 0.5% $271 0.3%
610 Hospital 16.78 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0%
492 Racquet Club 17.14 /KSF/DAY 31,858 546 141,971 0.1% $37 0.0%
Subtotals for Group 1 106,405 27,665,373 17.6% $15,872 17.6%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2 21 - 100 0.5595
848 Tire Store 24.87 /KSF/DAY 67,269 1,673 434,976 0.3% $451 0.5%
630 Clinic 31.45 /KSF/DAY 13,111 412 107,207 0.1% $88 0.1%
862 Home Improvement Superstore 35.05 /KSF/DAY 250,084 8,765 2,279,015 1.5% $1,678 1.9%
817 Nurse Garden Center) 36.08 /KSF/DAY 13,897 501 130,364 0.1% $93 0.1%
720 Medical-Dental Office Building 36.13 /KSF/DAY 275,493 9,954 2,587,926 1.6% $1,848 2.1%
841 New Car Sales 37.50 /KSF/DAY 218,162 8,181 2,127,081 1.4% $1,464 1.6%
812. Building Materials and Lumber Store 39.71 /KSF/DAY 104,182 4,137 1,075,637 0.7% $699 0.8%
814 S ecial Retail Center 40.67 /KSF/DAY 685,461 27,878 7,248,202 4.6% $4,598 5.1%
861 Discount Club 41.80 /KSF/DAY 144,571 6,043 1,571,200 1.0% $970 1.1%
820 Shopping Center 42.92 /KSF/DAY 1,825,496 78,350 20,371,075 13.0% $12,246 13.6%
863 Electronics Superstore 45.04 /KSF/DAY 64,954 2,926 760,638 0.5% $436 0.5010
813 Free-Standing Discount Superstore 46.96 fKSF/DAY 141,530 6,646 1,728,030 1.1% $949 1.1%
816 Hardware/Paint Store 51.29 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0%
590 Libra 54.00 /KSF/DAY 13,006 702 182,604 0.1% $87 0.1%
815 Free-Standing Discount Store 56.63 /KSF/DAY 484,169 27,418 7,128,808 4.5% $3.248 3.6%
843 Automobile Parts Sales 61.91 /KSF/DAY 42,082 2,605 677,380 0.4% $282 0.3%
730 Government Office 68.93 /KSF/DAY 78,983 5,444 1,415,516 0.9% $530 0.6%
565 Da Care Center 79.26 /KSF/DAY 51,624 4,092 1,063,847 0.7% $346 0.4%
831 Quality Restaurant 89.95 /KSF/DAY 104,767 9,424 2,450,190 1.6% $703 0.8%
880 Pharmacy/Drugstore 90.06 /KSF/DAY 17,202 1,549 402,790 0.3% $115 0.1%
Subtotals for Group 2 206,702 53,742,486 34.3% $30,832 34.3%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 3 100 - <400 1.8171
732 Post Office 108.19 /KSF/DAY 21,487 2,325 604,416 0.4% $469 0.5%
850 Supermarket 111.51 /KSF/DAY 305,121 34,024 8,846,254 5.6% $6,653 7.4%
832 High-Turnover Sit Down Restaurant 130.34 /KSF/DAY 129,997 16,944 4,405,388 2.8% $2,835 3.1%
444 Movie Theater With Matinee See Report) /SC/DAY 12 4,511 1,172,870 0.7% $262 0.3%
844 Gasoline/Service Station (Avg. 844, 845,846 161.39 NFP/DAY 130 20,981 5,454,982 3.5% $2,835 3.1%
912 Bank 265.21 /KSF/DAY 73,293 19,438 5,053,889 3.2% $1,598 1.8%
Subtotals for Group 3 98,222 25,537,800 16.3% $14,651 16.3%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 4 >400 6.9853
834 Fast-Food Restaurant 496.12 /KSF/DAY 63,787 31,646 8,227,975 5.2% $5,347 5.9%
851 Convenience Market (24-Hour) 737.99 /KSF/DAY 23,863 17,610 4,578,684 2.9% $2,000 2.2%
Subtotals for Group 4 49,256 12,806,659 8.2% $7,347 8.2%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 5 SPECIAL) 0.0336
411 City Park 1.59 /AC/DAY 152 242 62,837 0.0% $61 0.1%
566 Cemetery 4.73 /AC/DAY 28 131 34,188 0.0% $11 0.0%
430 Golf Course 5.04 /AC/DAY 48 243 63,240 0.0% $19 0.0%
,
Subtotals for Group 5 616, 160,265 0.1% $92 0.1%
TOTALS 603,373 156,876,922, 100.0% $90,000 100.0%
Enter Revenue Desired: 90,000
,a
Note: DU (DWELLING UNITS), SF (SQUARE FEET), ACRE (ACRES), VFP (VEHICLE FILL POINTS), SC (SCREENS) PAGE 1 OF 1
I:\ENG\GUS\Street Maintenance Fee\New Maintenance Fees-2002.xis Appendix B'3 Date: 315/02
~ _~,r 3-nom.
:'.i. it..t
r
N- h.p of Tigard
~ttreet Maintenance Fee &%dg
g'freet Light Maintenance
DtJSF;6lCFtE, %'nF;, %-OF
ITE iTE 1tFP, SC, TRIP~/YEAR TOTAL. , DIRECT TOTAL i7AiIJMO;
.
Code" Land UswCategory , 'TRIPS UNIT CI1YWh6E TRIPSIDIaY 260.tlays "TRIPS,` COSTNEAR CdST Per Un
210 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 9.57 /DU/DAY 10,422 99,739 25,932,020 16.5% $73,559 16.5% 0.5882
220 MULTI FAMILY 6.63 /DU/DAY 6,400 42,432 11,032,320 7.0% $31,294 7.0% 0.4075
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 1 0 20) 0.48-12-
120 General Heavy Industrial 1.50 /KSF/DAY 723,759 1,086 282,266 0.2% $4,179 0.9%
252 Congregate Care Facili 2.15 /DU/DAY 112 241 62,608 0.0% $647 0.1%
151 Mini-Warehouse 2.50 /KSF/DAY 328,090 820 213,259 0.1% $1,895 0.4%
140 Manufacturing 3.82 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0/
311 All Suites Hotel 4.90 /DU/DAY 246 1,205 313,404 0.2% $1,421 0.3%
150 Warehousing 4.96 /KSF/DAY 31,898 158 41,135 0.0% $184 0.0%
864 To /Children's Superstore 4.99 /KSF/DAY 44,604 223 57,869 0.0% $258 0.1%
890 Furniture Store 5.06 /KSF/DAY 279,329 1,413 367,485 0.2% $1,613 0.4%
320 Motel 5.63 /DU/DAY 447 2,517 654,319 0.4% $2,581 0.6%
130 Industrial Park 6.96 /KSF/DAY 3,225,614 22,450 5,837,071 3.7% $18,626 4.2%
110 General Light Industrial 6.97 /KSF/DAY 3,219,359 22,439 5,834,122 3.7% $18,590 4.2%
310 Hotel 8.23 /DU/DAY 384 3,160 821,683 0.5% $2,217 0.5%
560 Church 9.11 /KSF/DAY 366,651 3,340 868,450 0.6% $2,117 0.5%
710 General Office 11.01 /KSF/DAY 3,313,850 36,485 9,486,227 6.0% $19,136 4.3%
522 Junior High School 11.92 /KSF/DAY 232,605 2,773 720,888 0.5% $1,343 0.3%
520 Elements School 12.03 /KSF/DAY 371,802 4,473 1,162,923 0.7% $2,147 0.5%
530 High School 13.27 /KSF/DAY 231,782 3,076 799,693 0.5% $1,338 0.3%
610 ~ Hospital 16.78 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0%
1 492 Racquet Club 17.14 /KSF/DAY 31,858 546 141,971 0.1% $184 0.0%
j Subtotals for Grou 1 106,405 27,665,373 17.6% $78,476 17.6%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2 21' - 100 2.7641
848 Tire Store 24.87 /KSF/DAY 67,269 1,673 434,976 0.3% $2,231 0.5%
630 Clinic 31.45 /KSF/DAY 13,111 412 107,207 0.1% $435 0.1%
862 Home Improvement Superstore 35.05 /KSF/DAY 250,084 8,765 2,279,015 1.5% $8,295 1.9%
817 Nurse Garden Center 36.08 /KSF/DAY 13,897 501 130,364 0.1% $461 0.1%
720 Medical-Dental Office Buildin 36.13 /KSF/DAY 275,493 9,954 2,587,926 1.6% $9,138 2.1%
841 New Car Sales 37.50 /KSF/DAY 218,162 8,181 2,127,081 1.4% $7,236 1.6%
812 Building Materials and Lumber Store 39.71 /KSF/DAY 104,182 4,137 1,075,637 0.7% $3,456 0.8%
814 Specialty Retail Center 40.67 /KSF/DAY 685,461 27,878 7,248,202 4.6% $22,736 5.1%
861 Discount Club 41.80 /KSF/DAY 144,571 6,043 1,571,200 1.0% $4,795 1.1%
820 Sho in, Center 42.92 /KSF/DAY 1,825,496 78,350 20,371,075 13.0% $60,550 13.6%
863 Electronics Superstore 45.04 /KSF/DAY 64,954 2,926 760,638 0.5% $2,154 0.5%
813 Free-Standing Discount Superstore 46.96 /KSF/DAY 141,530 6,646 1,728,030 1.1% $4,694 1.1%
816 Hardware/Paint Store 51.29 /KSF/DAY 0 0 0 0.0% $0 0.0%
590 Libra 54.00 /KSF/DAY 13,006 702 182,604 0.1% $431 0.1%
815 Free-Standin Discount Store 56.63 /KSF/DAY 484,169 27,418 7,128,808 4.5% $16,059 3.6%
843 Automobile Parts Sales 61.91 /KSF/DAY 42,082 2,605 677,380 0.4% $1,396 0.3%
730 Government Office 68.93 /KSF/DAY 78,983 5,444 1,415,516 0.9% $2,620 0.6%
565 Da Care Center 79.26 /KSF/DAY 51,624 4,092 1,063,847 0.7% $1,712 0.4%
831 Quality Restaurant 89.95 /KSF/DAY 104,767 9,424 2,450,190 1.6% $3,475 0.8%
680 Pharmacy/Drugstore 90.06 /KSF/DAY 17,202 1,549 402,790 0.3% $571 0.1%
Subtotals for Group 2 206,702 53,742,486 34.3% $152,447 34.3%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 3 100 - <400) 1 8.9846
732 Post Office 108.19 /KSF/DAY 21,487 2,325 604,416 0.4% $2,317 0.5%
850 Supermarket 111.51 /KSF/DAY 305,121 34,024 8,846,254 5.6% $32,897 7.4%
832. High-Turnover (Sit Down) Restaurant 130.34 /KSF/DAY 129,997 16,944 4,405,388 2.8% $14,016 3.1%
` 444 Movie Theater With Matinee See Report) 375.92 /SC/DAY 12 4,511 1,172,870 0.7% $1,294 0.3%
844 Gasoline/Service Station (Avg. 844, 845,846) 161.39 NFP/DAY 130 20,981 5,454,982 3.5% $14,016 3.1%
912 Bank 265.21 /KSF/DAY 73,293 19,438 5,053,889 3.2% $7,902 1.8%
Subtotals for Grou 3 98,222 25,537,800 16.3% $72,441 16.3%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 4 >400) 34.5386
834 Fast-Food Restaurant 496.12 /KSF/DAY 63,787 31,646 8,227,975 5.2% $26,437 5.9%
851 Convenience Market (24-Hour) 737.99 /KSF/DAY 23,863 17,610 4,578,684 2.9% $9,890 2.2%
Subtotals for Group 4 49,256 12,806,659 8.2% $36,328 8.2%
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 5 (SPECIAL) 0.1661
411 City Park 1.59 /AC/DAY 152 242 62,837 0.0% $303 0.1%
566 Cemetery 4.73 /AC/DRY 28 131 34,188 0.0% $55 0.0°%
430 Golf Course 5.04 /AC/DAY 48 243 63,240 0.0% $96 0.0%
Subtotals for Group 5 616 160,265 0.1% $455 0.1%
TOTALS 603,373 156,876,922 100.0% $445,000 100.0%
Enter Revenue Desired: 5,000
Note: DU (DWELLING UNITS), SF (SQUARE FEET), ACRE (ACRES). VFP (VEHICLE FILL POINTS), SC (SCREENS) PAGE 1 OF 1
I:\ENG\GUS\SVeePMaintenance Fee\New Maintenance Fees-2002.x1s Apperidlx Date:. 3/5/02
N
City of Tigard
Street Maintenance Fee Study
Summa of Rates
Street Fee'. ROtl1i' Fee , Sidewalk,Fee . Streetlight
ITE Code Land Use Category Rate ' Rafe Rate Fee _Rate Totals
210 SINGLE FAMILY (DETACHED 1.0574 0.3569 0.1190 0.5882 2.1214
220 MULTI FAMILY 0.7325 0.2472 0.0824 0.4075 1.4697
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 1 0 - 20) 0.8651 0.2920 0.0973 0.4812 1.7356
120 General Hea Industrial
252 Congregate Care Facility
151 Mini-Warehouse
140 Manufacturing
311 All Suites Hotel
150 Warehousing
864 To /Children's Superstore
890 Furniture Store
320 Motel
130 Industrial Park
110 General Light Industrial
310 Hotel
560 Church
710 General Office
522 Junior High School
520 Elements School
530 High School
610 Hospital
492 Racquet Club
I
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2 21 - 100) 4.9592 1.6771 0.5590 2.7641 9.9694
848 Tire Store
630 Clinic
862 Home Improvement Superstore
817 Nurse (Garden Center
720 Medical-Dental Office Building
841 New Car Sales
812 Building Materials and Lumber Store
814 Specialty Retail Center
861 Discount Club
820 Shopping Center
863 Electronics Superstore
813 Free-Standing Discount Superstore
816 Hardware/Paint Store
590 Libra
815 Free-Standing Discount Store
843 Automobile Parts Sales
730 Government Office
565 Da Care Center
831 Quality Restaurant
880 Pharmac /Dru store
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 3 100 - <400 16.1521 5.4513 1.8171 8.9846 32.4052
732 Post Office
850 Supermarket
832 High-Turnover (Sit Down) Restaurant
444 Movie Theater With Matinee (See Report)
844 Gasoline/Service Station (Avg. 844, 845,846)
912 Bank
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 4 (>400) 62.0920 20.9560 6.9853 34.5386 124.5720
834 Fast-Food Restaurant
851 Convenience Market (24-Hour
NON-RESIDENTIAL GROUP 5 SPECIAL 0.2986 0.1008 0.0336 0.1661 0.5991
411 City Park
566 Cemetery
a 430 Golf Course
Page 1 of 1 Appendix C
!p!'!~ ;Iw FINITE 1112111141
!Ijj
Summary of Fees for All Maintenance Elements
Citywide Maintenance of ROW and Sidewalks Included
Land Use Street Citywide Citywide Street Light Total
Category Maint. ROW Sidewalk and Signal
Maint. Maint. System
Maint.
Single $ 1.0574 $ 0.7930 $ 0.2643 $ 0.5882 $2.7030
Family
Multi- $ 0.7325 $ 0.5494 $ 0.1831 $ 0.4075 $1.8726
Family
Group 1 $ 0.8651 $ 0.6488 $ 0.2163 $ 0.4812 $2.2114
Group 2 $ 4.9692 $ 3.7269 $ 1.2423 $ 2.7641 $12.7024
Group 3 $16.1521 $ 12.1141 $ 4.0380 $ 8.9846 $41.2889
Group 4 $62.0920 $46.5690 $ 15.5230 $34.5386 $158.7226
Group 5 $ 0.2986 $ 0.2240 $ 0.0747 $ 0.1661 $0.7634
Estimated Costs:
• Assumption of Citywide maintenance for rights-of-way costs requires approximately
$600,000 revenue annually. The calculations for the ROW maintenance on the
Citywide scenario are based on that revenue. The Study Report estimated $270,000
annually for maintenance on collectors only.
• The estimated cost for sidewalk repair and maintenance Citywide is $200,000. The
calculations for the fee on the Citywide scenario for this maintenance element are
based on that amount. The Study Report estimated $90,000 annually for sidewalk
repair and maintenance on collectors only.
Note:
The table above shows the estimated fee requirements for including Citywide ROW and
Sidewalk maintenance. However, the current code requires the homeowner for each lot to
maintain both the ROW and sidewalk between the curb and the property line for those
streets that have curb and sidewalk. The assumption of this responsibility by the City is
therefore not only a question of cost, but is also a matter of policy. The change in policy
direction should also be taken into consideration in the overall discussion for Citywide
assumption of this responsibility.
Copies to: /
Mayor/Council i/ Dther-
To: Tigard City Council City Manager (rte' DAMS
Council File
From: Paul Hunt
10320 SW Century Oak Dr.
Tigard, Oregon 97224
This letter is questioning what I understand the city is considering to raise more money
from the tax payer. I will be making statements based on facts that have been given to me
in conversation but which I have no way of verifying. If any of them are incorrect I would
be happy to have corrected facts.
My concern is about a council meeting on March 18, 2002 where the staff will be
presenting a plan under consideration for raising money to finance city services. It is my
understanding a committee was appointed to study how the city can maintain the city right
of ways.
Until recently the city maintained the right of way along Durham Road (and possibly other
city streets). They recently withdrew this service saying they no longer could have the
financial means to continue this. Now it is my understanding they are considering a means
of taxing (although they will probably call it a users fee) the citizens to resunle this service.
This would be accomplished by increasing the water and sewer billing by an add on. This
bill currently is one of the largest monthly service bill many of us pay. To add to it would
present a great hardship in many instances. Not only are is the city considering using this
new tax as a means of paying for maintenance of property owned by the city but also
paying for street lighting which is now paid for by property taxes. Since the amount of
property tax is limited by law the city appears to be locking for a loop hole to by pass this
limitation and increase the tax on Tigard citizens. I assume if this is legal they could also
increase the fee to support operation of the library. How can you, in all good conscience,
add a new tax to provide services that you have covered by property taxes for years?
Another area that concerns me is the timing of this consideration. It is my understanding
the staff will make the presentation on March 18th but will not ask for a consideration at
this time. Why? Because of the adverse action this would generate on the library bond
vote that is on the ballot for May. I am very much is support of the library bond issue.
I have supported the city, including its bond issues, for a number of years but feel this is a
very underhanded and deceptive way of increasing taxes. I was proud to serve on the
council for eight years because I felt they operated above board and were honest with the
citizens. I would not be proud to be on the council if this increase passes without a vote of
the tax payer. It is also my understanding, since the city will consider this as a user fee and
not a tax, it does not have to go to a vote of the tax payers. I don't think I could sleep very
well if I was a member of the city council or the city staff promoting if the tax is approve
with out a vote of the taxpayer.
- RECEIVED C.O.T.
~ , MAR 0 ? 2002
Administration
11111
CITY OF TIGARD
Engineering Department
Shaping A Better Community
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Phone 503-639-4171
Fax: 503-624-0752
TO: Mayor and City Councilors
Bill Monahan, City Manager
FROM: Gus Duenas
City Engineer
DATE: March 7, 2002
SUBJECT: Comments in Response to Letter Received March 7, 2002
from Mr. Paul Hunt Opposing the Street Maintenance Fee
Attached is a letter from former City Councilor Paul Hunt opposing implementation of the Street
Maintenance Fee. The following responses are to clarify the intent of the Street Maintenance Fee
and to respond to some of the concerns expressed in Mr. Hunt's letter.
Background
The Street Maintenance Fee is a user fee intended to primarily provide a source of revenue for
performing preventative and corrective maintenance on the City streets. The State Gas Tax has
not been increased in a decade and by next fiscal year will cease to be a viable source of funding
for greatly needed pavement overlays and slurry seals on the City streets. As the Maintenance
Fee Study Report states, the City has a maintenance backlog of approximately $2 million in
reconstruction, pavement overlays and slurry seal work. Without an infusion of new funding for
i this basic preventative maintenance work, the City's street infrastructure would swiftly
+ deteriorate to the point where the only remedy would be expensive reconstruction. The Street
Maintenance Fee has been successfully implemented in a few other cities in Oregon. The
calculations are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation rates, which
are nationally recognized and widely accepted. These trip generation rates are the basis for the
Countywide Traffic Impact Fees that we now collect from new development.
The Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force was created to evaluate new sources of
funding for both maintenance of the existing infrastructure and expansion of the major streets to
meet current and future traffic demands. The Street Maintenance Fee was recommended by the
Task Force. Council directed the Task Force to perform a study to determine the feasibility of
implementing such a fee and report the findings to Council.
Maintenance Elements
The basic maintenance element in the Street Maintenance Fee Study is corrective and
preventative maintenance of the streets. We included street light and traffic signal system energy
costs and maintenance to our study primarily because the street lights and traffic signal
systems are funded totally from State Gas Tax funds, not from General Fund dollars. As
such, they reduce the amount available for corrective and preventative maintenance of the street
infrastructure. Funding those costs from the Street Maintenance Fee would free up, gas tax
dollars to possibly commit to revenue bonds to widen one or more of the major streets in the
City. It could also allow the City to construct selected sidewalk projects to enhance transit stops
and to provide for better pedestrian access to local schools from surrounding neighborhoods.
These projects would be intended to enhance safety for users of the transit system and for school
children to walk to and from the schools they attend. These two maintenance elements (street
maintenance and street light and traffic signal system maintenance) are our high priority
elements because we now do street maintenance and pay for the street lights and traffic signals
from gas tax revenues.
The rights-of-way and sidewalk maintenance are add-ons because we do not do them now and
most likely will not be able to do them unless new funding is provided to support those two
activities. Prior to approval of this fiscal year's budget (FY 2001-02), there was an extensive
evaluation performed for rights-of-way and sidewalk maintenance on a limited basis on collector
streets. The conclusion reached through the budget approval process is that maintenance could
not be included in this fiscal year's budget without seriously crippling the City's preventative
maintenance program. Hence, those elements were not included in this fiscal year's budget, and
most likely will not be included in future budgets without an alternative source of funds to
provide the revenue to support the effort. The Task Force felt that these two add-ons should be
included in the study to determine the impact on the overall fees for each land use category.
Timing for Possible Implementation
The Task Force presented its initial report and received Council direction to perform the study on
August 28, 2001. We performed the study with our in-house staff. Some elements of the study
were extremely time-consuming. The most difficult and lengthy portion was the need to
inventory the commercial entities in the City. In many cases, we had to physically review the
properties and determine the existing uses on them to compute the square footage for the
calculations. It took us approximately four months to complete the work. We then presented the
preliminary findings to the Task Force at the Task Force meeting on January 17, 2002. The Task
Force directed the preparation of the report, reviewed the draft report at its meeting on February
21, 2002, and approved it for submittal to Council for discussion and further direction. The
following is the tentative time frame we propose to follow for possible implementation:
C March 19, 2002: Presentation of Draft Street Maintenance Fee Report to Council at a
Workshop Session for discussion and direction
Comments in Response to Paul Hunt
Page 2 of 3
• April through June 2002: Meetings with some of the commercial entities that would be
charged the most based on our fee calculations to explain the reasons for the fee and to
gauge reactions to the possible implementation
• July 2002: Bring-back Street Maintenance Fee to Council with input from those
businesses for further discussion and decision
• August 2002: Implement Street Maintenance Fee
Summary
There is an urgent need to find alternative sources of funding for both maintenance of the
existing street network and expansion of key major streets to meet current and fixture traffic
demands. The Street Maintenance Fee is a user fee based on widely accepted trip generation
rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The implementation of the fee to
cover the maintenance costs for basic street maintenance and the street lights and traffic signal
system costs would free up gas tax dollars for possible use in projects to enhance safety and to
finance future expansion of the most heavily traveled streets in the City. The Task Force chose to
include the maintenance elements of rights-of-way and sidewalk maintenance because there has
been interest from some citizens in including those elements. However, they are optional at this
point because we are not budgeted for that work and most likely would not assume that
responsibility without funding to support the work.
Attachment
c: Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force members
Mr. Paul Hunt
lAEng\Gus\Memorandums\Comn=ts in Response to Letter from Paul Hunt.doc
Comments in Response to Paul Hunt
Page 3 of 3
Street Maintenance Fee
Study Report
Presentation to City Council
March 19, 2002
Th ~~t~'~ Fundona fee s
e Street Maintenance
- Preventative Maintenance
- Corrective Maintenance
® Widening and reconstruction of major
collectors
- to meet existing and future traffic demands
- to meet current geometric alignment
standards 7
z
funclina Sh®rtfall
• State gas tax is primary source of funding
for street maintenance
• Gas tax has not increased in a decade
• Funding for overlays and slurry seals has
steadily decreased over the years - in FY
2001-02 that amount is $207,000
• Gas tax has ceased to be a viable source
of funds
3
Transportation Financing
tr~~iias `Task®a~~
• Formed by City Council to
- Evaluate reasons for failure of November
2000 bond measure
- Determine funding strategies for
® Corrective and preventative maintenance of
City Sti gets
+ o Recons :ruction and widening of collector
streets to meet current and future traffic
demands
a
2
Task Force Review of
Potential ~ur~daroa W
• Local Gas Tax • Urban Renewal Tax
• Block Grants Increment Funds
• Traffic Impact Fee • Street Utility Fee
• Local Improvement • Local Option Funds
Districts (LIDs) • Oregon
• Transportation Bond Transportation
• General Fund Infrastructure Bank
Transfers • Systems
• General Obligation Development
Charges
Bonds • TEA-21 funding
s
Task l°~rGe Rec~mendatie~ra
e Requested Council direction to pursue
initiation of a Street Maintenance Fee:
- Study establishment and implementation of
a Street Maintenance Fee
- Prepare a detailed report to be brought
back to Council
LA., * *
6
3
Street a~~etenanCe fee Stludv
® Directed by Council at August 28, 2001
Council meeting
® Draft Report presented to Transportation
Financing Strategies Task Force on
February 21, 2002
® Task Force recommended submittal to
Council for discussion and direction
7
Street UelntenenCe fee
® Allocates costs to users of the system
® Fees are equitable based on established
and accepted trip generation rates
® Resources are dedicated to specific
transportation services (i.e. maintenance)
® Collected through existing utility bills
® Can be implemented through Council
action
8
4
Street Maintenance Fee
tj-g ~v Other Cities
s Other cities adopting the fee include
Tualatin, Medford, Wilsonville, Portland,
Ashland, etc.
® Residential rates vary from $1.42 to $5.12
per month
e Implemented through Council action
9
Street Main a- nzni fee StM ffidv
e Includes
- City's street maintenance needs
- Long-term program for annual street
maintenance
- Four maintenance elements
e Street Maintenance
® Rights-of-way Maintenance
• Sidewalk Maintenance
o Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance'
10
5
1911 11 -1111111 ~~~j
Street ~lieante~en~e E~ernent
• City street infrastructure old and not
designed for trucks
® Timely preventative and corrective
maintenance needed
- pavement overlays
- slurry seals
- reconstruction
Need fir 't'o~ely eir~tel~a~~e
40%oWh~
81AO ins 1s ket9
MGM
DOOR
4016 Oa+~ h ~ORp
VERY POOR 4reLct~i$4
12W,~® 1D~8.6DPi~e®
M1LED
1 Z a 4 8 6 7 8 8 10
1z
6
Street Maintenance
Pavement ~er~a..~~
13
Street Maintenance
Pavement Perfc~rnl~nce curve
14
7
Street AA~inte~ence ~aCklaa
Maintenance Category Cost
Street Reconstruction $ 590,000
Pavement Overlay $ 470,000
Slurry Seals $1,010,000
Total Costs $2,070,000
15
~treet ~aintel~~I~Ce Needs
' Johnson Street
r ~'TXa T n w
{
{
{
{ Mapleleaf Street
(71 st Avenue to 72nd)
16
8
street (~aintenance Needs
i
Walnut Terrace
Rose Vista Drive
17
street i~aentenance Deeds
6
18
9