City Council Packet - 01/15/2002
: ~ ? . < t't . : t tr a. , t ~ ,.41~N~ i ti~ . i , 1 b 'y; , ! , , q. 4~ ~ Y i ~ uQ r .'~~f. ~ y. +r~~79 ~ tyi~ .
, ~ L . i.}• F t~:t. ~''t 5 ,{,r~~ ~~'yV~~SZy ..Iy ~ 5r r~ a~'~'i) ,~jn j' ~I r~'~~ ,F` !r
~ti ✓ ~ t 1~ t, 1 1.; ~ f ~~d t. 'S1 r~l+~ Y.~f. lt~~,,~ is 1t,f~ r
,41 ~ i I Y.; i t~ •.l~ i 7t~`u, f ~3h}.iT' t? ~3q~,~~} f'ii.Y t.rr~i~,~ri~
4t,
, . . i ~ 1 I~ yl ~ ~ j•{'~~'~iY - i ~~J r~1 "~'~~N
' r r r ~ ' 'i , t 'S 'a 1 r 1 E p k i 1 `,~'r'rNS',.
. I"~ .'i. ~ ' 4 ~T l41 n i 'I~K .1~ 4^j`Jr f. ~J
• . . i ~ G. l~ s k ~.tC + ~ ri1~tE ~M
.~}o
l , 1 ; (
- _ . 1 1 : ' • . ~ f J '~Y~ , ~ ~ ~ 3 R• ~ f lA } t~11' ~.L
i~
1
,
t~-
1 4 .s f~ Y ~ .t i q y+'~
' . . . 1 . . . , . • , I ` N
f~ ' ~ ' ti h~ 1 t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i,~~!-1•
~ {t~ S JS h'
't:I ~ TY,
Ay ~ ' . . '
~ METTIN~~y
' ' ~ t Y A . tr7 , rti !
JANU !1 1~,m 20~~
r~
' . . . • . , ' . - ~ + . t ~ ~ • ~ 2(`TtA' a.~'a } 1&GC~A ~st3` ,r ~ tc w.,'r~'
' , . i, lsM1 f )y) 1 '~j 4 a l~,iF 5r~lt r . S .
ti i ~ 1 t v~ 3 1rf k~i K~- k~rV,Y
aµXR24t~"1{+c~'i
iY 7 ~Y' 1e w~n3' ~r.~,'
1'~ b`s
f 4~~~ . ✓f~"4r ir y
COUNCIL EETI , rG'1ILL i~~.~
, ~ .vi ~ t t ~st -,`f1~'~
, i cL.'r~ !F g, wf'~~.p~vs'~aS;~s~~i..'~t~Dx t55•^~+.°
C,f ~A FI;~~~~~ • 11. ~ ~1~
• ' ~ ~ F t 1 ~ r l ` ~i+ aL iz ~i .t ' '4~ - ~ i4~
r
H'.VOmnn10Wmp%BaPkt2
• , " t M M1' S f tr~;~ Ye ~~'~t `4,.e`'s~rFy~{ .,~~1~^; : ~ t ; .
" ~ l ~ r ~ ~F ~ t ~y -t'11 H'J~`c^n`L!> >~+~a~ 4` ` •
' ' ' , • I ~ ~ I ~i . ' a ~ ~~f~~;fiYlS' f~~~3A . t ~ ~i~ ~~i~~'~'k~ S S
i : t 'tb^'Sy } ~ {5~ dd ~o'Y' y4~4'if
r Tf . M', . 7 r f~rTF.~ t Y ~t•~ N; }CM'P 5 d
fh
6
.
~
1
C4TY OF TIG/ARD
OREGOfd
PUBLIC NOTtCE:
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with irnpaired hearing and should be
scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please
call 503-639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Te(ecommun9cations
Devices for the Deafi).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;
and
• Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow
as much lead-time as possibie. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the
Thursday preceding the meeting date by calling:
503-639-41 71, x309 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunicadons Devices for
the Dea fl.
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
COIINCIL AGENDA - januar,r 15, 2002 page 1
/
i.
AGENDA
TIGARD CITI' COUNCIL'WORKSHQP MEET6NG
)ANUARY 15, 2002
6:30 PM
l . WORKSHOP MEETIiVG
1.1 Call to Order - City Council
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 P~edge of Allegiance
1.4 Counci! Cammunications Sz Liaison Reports
1.5 Call to Councii and Staff for Non Agenda Items
6:35 PM 2, ]OIAIT MEET11dG WlTH THE 1NTERGOVERNMEAITAL WATER BOARD TO
DISCUSS REGIONAL DRINKING WATER PROPOSAL
• Staff Report: Public 1Norks Qepartment
7:15 PM 3. IIPDATE ON TRANSFER OF ]UVENiLE CASES TO THE N(lIN1C1PAL COURT
• Staff Report: Finance Department
7:30 PM
4. 'UPDATE ON SKATIEBOARD PARK TASK FORCE
p Staff Report: Public Works Department and Skate Board Park Task Force Chair
Rich Carlson
7:50 PM
5. POLiCY DISCIISSION - Bl1LL MOl1NTA1N ANNEXATION
• Staff Report: Community Development Department
8:10 PM
6. IIPDATE ON METRO URBAN t;ROWTH BOliA1DARY EXPAAlS10N
• Staff RepOrt: Community Development Department
8:30 PM
7. UPDATE 0N WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIOAIAL CENTER
lMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY PLAN
0 Staff Report: Community aevelopment Department
9:05 PM
8. UPDATE ON WASHlNGTON COUNTI( LONG-RANGE TRAAISPOR?ATION
PLAN
• lntroduction: ~.ommunity Development Department.
• Update by: Gretchen Buehner, Representative on the dlVashington County Citizens
Advisory Comrnittee COIINCIL AGENDA -January 15, 2002 page 2
~
9:20 PM
9. COUAICiL LDALSON REPO1tTS
9:30 PFt
10. R10N-AGENDA ITEMS
9:90 PM
11. EXECl1Tli/E SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If
an Executive Session is calied to order, the appropriate ORS citatfon will be
announced identifying the applicable statue. ABI disCUSSion§ are confidentia( and
those present may disclose nothing from the Sessione Representat€ves of the news
media are allowed to attend ixecutive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3),
but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be hetd
for the purpose of tiaking any final action or making any fina( decision. Executi`re
Sessions are closed to the public.
9 0:00 PNt
12. AD]OIiRAIME1VT
\1TI G3331USRlD EPTSIADMICATHYICCAW20115.DOC
COUNCIL AGENDA -)anuary 15, 2002 page 3
.
AGENDA
TIGpeRD CITY COllNCiL ADN(9NISI'RATIVE ITEMS FOR REVIEW
]ANl!ARY 15 2002
The StuQy Jession is held in the Red Rock Creelr Cor9ferenee Room. Enter at the back of Town Half. 7he
Coundl encoctrages Interested chizens to attend a11 or part of the mPedng. if the num6er of aetersdee.s exceeds
the capacity of the Conference Room, the Counrll may mave the Swdy Sesston to the Town Hall.
> EXECUTIVE SESSfOAI: The Tigard City Coundl may go inW Execudve Session. If an
Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation vutll be announced
identifying the applicable statue. All discussions are confidendaf and those present may
disclose nothing from the Seuion. Representatives ofi the news media are alluwed to attend
Facecutive Sessions, as provlded by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any informadon
discussed. No Execudve Session may be held for the purpose of taking an, flnal action or
making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public.
> ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS e Library staffing
• Disvibute to Councit: Articie from 12/10/01 ClSA teday - Red ink overtakes state
budgets
~
~
~
~
~
~
f
~
D Executive Session -
The Public Mee!ings Law authorizes governing badies to meet in exetutive sessfon !n certain
limited siwadons (OR$ 1 y2o660). An "executive session" ds deflned as "any meeeing or part of
a meeting of a goveming body, which is ciosed to certain persons for deliberation on certain
matters."
Permissib[e Purposes for Executive Sessions:
192.660 (1) (a) - Employmert of pubiic offlcers, employees and agents,
if che body has satisfled certain prerequisites.
192.660 (1) (b) - Discipline of public officers and emptflyees (uniess affected person requesis
. to have an open hearing).
192.660 (1) (c) - To consider matters pertaining to medical staff of a public hospital.
, 192.660 (1) (d) - Labor negotiations. (Alews media can be excluded in this instance.)
192.660 (1) (e) - Real property transaction negotiadons.
192.660 (1) (f) - Exempt pubfic records - to consider records that are "exempt by law from
public inspection." These records are specifically identified in the Oregon
Revised Statutes.
192-660 (1) (g) - Trade negotiatlons - involving matters of trade. or commerce in which the
governing body is competing with other governing bodies.
192.560 (1) (h) - Legal counsel - Executive session are approprlate for cansultation with
counse( concerning legal rights and dutles regarding current lidgation or
_ litigatton likel/ to be filed.
' 192.660 (1) (1) - To review and evaluate, pursuant to standards, criteria, and policy
directives adopted by the governing body, the employment-re(ated
performance of the chief executive officer, a public officer, employee or
staff inember unless the affected person requesu an open hearing. The
. standards, criteria and policy directives to be used in evaluating chief
executive officers shail be adopted by the governing body in meetings open
to the public in which there has been an opportunity for publlc commenL
192.660 (1) Pubpc investments - to carry on negodaeions under ORS Chapter 293 with
private persons or businesses regarding proposed acquisidon, exchange or
liquidat;on of public investments.
192.660 (1) (k)- Relates to health professiona( regulatory board.
I: W D WATHMOUNCI UCCLI ST. DOC
Agenda Itern No. I
IWlNIITES Meeting of 3 t I& . DZ
TIGARD CITV COUNClL 1NORKSHOP MEETING
JANUARY 15, 2002
l . WORKSfiOP MEETING
1.1 Nlayor Griffi.th called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
1.2 Council Present: Mayor Griffith; Councilors Dirksen, Moore, Patton, and
Scheckla
1.3 Pledge Qf Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications 8t Liaison Reports: None
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Alon Agenda Iterns
• City Manager Monahan advised he would update the Counci( on an item
scheduled on the ]anuary 22, 2002, Consent Agenda, regarding a position
in the Library.
> City Manager Monahan reminded the City Council members that the Olympic Torch
Run would be traveling through the City of Tigard on ]anuary 22, 2002.
2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE INTERGOd/ERNMENTAL WATER BOARD (1WB)
TO DISCUSS REGIONAL DRINKING WATER PROPOSAL
IWB Members Present: Jan Drangsholdt, Bill Scheiderich, Bev Froude.
Also Present: Ed Wegner, Pub(ic Works Director; Dennis Koellermeier, Utilities
Manager; and Phil Smith, President of Murray, Smith and Associates.
Public Works Director Wegner introduced this agenda iterro and presented the staff
report. A copy of the staff repor-t is on file in the City Recorder's office. The
purpose of this agenda is to bring the Councif and IWB members up to date on the
regional drinking water proposal.
A copy of the PowerPoint presentation prepared by Mr. Wegner and ARr.
Koellermeier as delivered to the City Council is on flie in the City Recorder's office.
The presentation included the following information on the regionat drinking water
proposal:
e Schedule
- • Iteview of progress report recommendations
• Draft recommendation and conditions of approvaf
• Discussion of "deal killers"
o Other options
COUNC!!. NIEETING M1NUTES -]A.1elUARY 15, 2002 page 1
<
Council discussed the seven conditions that were specifled in order for continued
participation in the detailed innplementation planning phase In the regional drinking
water initiative process:
Condition
1. Scope of Work - Implementation Phase
To include as a deliverable, the final cost of each partner will be expected to
pay. 'Phis shall include buy-in costs and future projected water costs for each
rnember.
2. Agency not to abandon concept of regionalization.
Understanding the logic that has refocused the current effort to the Bu(!
Run/Columbia Southshore wellfield, as well as the financial benefits to the
region of interrying the principal sources, it is clear that to include the
Willamette River as a potential source will not be accepted by the pubiic. We
believe that the Clackamas and TrasMc/Tualatin systems should be considered
for inclusion at some future time.
3. Current efforts to develop equitable wholesale contracts to be completed in a
parallel process to this project.
The wholesale contracts needed by the suburban partners to compare to the
costs that will be identified in Condition N0. 9 by August 1, 2002.
4. Scope of work for future phase shall include as a deliverable, a working draft of
a 190 [ntergovernmental Agreement (IGA) that will form the new agency.
The IGA should be complete in that it will address governance, costs,
operational rules, etc.
5. New agency to provide for equity of supply and cost of sale among all
members.
6. New agency will keep individual options open fQr local decisions.
7. New agency should not consider including distribution or other water delivery
functions at this time.
To include these issues now wili only confiuse the issues of equity, ownership
cost, etc.
In response to a questiore from Mayor Griffith, Public Vdorks Director Wegner advised
that the regional water agency might represent a method for ownership in the water
supply system, transmission infrastructure and provide some certainty for water
availability. !t was noted that water rights must be left with Portland. There is a
method wherein a jurisdiction's supply lines can be owned separately.
Councilor Patton said she needed from the City Council and IWB members their input
regard9ng the conditions proposed. She noted that, for example, that Condition No.
6 woufd be imperative to keep and, if not, then that would be considered to be a
"deal killer" for Tigard. Councilor Patton noted the importance of keeping the
discussion about regional water "alive" for benefit of the long-term needs for the
metro area.
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -]ANIIARY 15, 2002 page 2
s
In reference ta Condition N'o. i, it was noeed that dQtermination of how assets would
be divfded for dlstribution and water de{ivery functlons would be complex. The
preference would be to begin just as a water supply and transmission agency.
Distribution systems in thp. regton iieed varytng amounts of maintenance and upgrades.
Councilar Patton advised that Condition No. 3, regarding the wholesale contracts, was
important because of a need to keep moving forward on these contracts,
Nir. Phit Smith noted that the process for the discussion of the regional drinking vvater
initiative was discouragingiy slow over the last three months. Staff has been working
with the City of Portland and five other wholesale customers on the regional drinking
water proposal. Mr. Smith revtewed the work done to move toward a basis for
establishing a rate. An agreement for a regional drinking water initiative would take
about 12 months.
There was discussion about the )oint Water Commission (]WC) and the Trask/Hagg
Lake study. This is a tuvo-year study; hawever, Tigard officials should know within a
year if 10,ning the ]WC is feasible. lf Tigard and the ]WC become partners, water for
Tigard from this source would not be fully online for up to ] 2 years from now.
Therefore, regardless of which option is chosen (regional water supply or JWC), the
City of Tigard will need a wholesale water contract.
Ms. Drangsholdt noted that the liAlB is adamant on Condition iVo. 6.
The City of Tigard's share for the regional study wrould be $25,000. Currently, 12
agencies are pardcipating.
All agencies are reviewing the recommendations for moving forward with the regiona(
drinking water supply initiative and are developing conditions of acceptance.
Councilor Patton requested flexibility as she continues to represent Tigard in the
discussions concerning the regional drinking water supply proposal. Council members
supported of Councilor Patton's request and that she should have latitude during these
discussions. Councilor Dirksen noted that there will probably be elements within the .
conditions that wiil need to be negotiated. At its January 22, 2002, City Council
meeting, the Council will consider a formal motion to give Councilor Patton the
authority to negotiate on behalf of the City of Tigard.
(Agenda Item No. 4 was discussed at this time.)
COl1NCIL MEETING MINIITES - JANl1ARY 15, 2002 page 3
3. UPDATE ON TRANSFER OF )UVENILE CASES TO THE MUNICIPA! COURT
)udge Michael O'Brien and N(unicipal Court Manager Tladine Robinson were nresent
f'or this agenda item. A copy of the staff report is on file In the City Recorder's office.
Council reviewed a juvenile case flow chart prepared to show what the City of Tigard
Municipal Court would process. This would start out as a pilot program.
]udge O'Brien advised that the only sentencing option not available ta the juvenile
cases heard before the Municipal Court would be incarceration. )uvenile offenders
can be sentenced to perform comrnunitjr service.
There was discussion on the Peer Court operation at the City of 7'igard. Peer Court is
set up to deal with first-offender violations including minor traffic and misdemeanors.
The Municipat Court has capacity to take on the juvenile case{oad because tlie City
did not implement the photo radar program. The first docket may occur In March.
Council consensus was in support of transfemng first-time offender juvenile cases to
the City of Tigard Municipal Court. Fonnal approval was tentatively scheduled for
Council review at its February 12, 2002, meeting.
Reports on how the juvenile caseload is progressing will be forwarded to the Council
in ivlay and September.
(Agenda Item No. 5 was considered next.)
4. UPDATE OA! SKATEBOARD PaARK TASK FORCE
Public Work Director Ed Wegner and Parks Manager Dan Plaza were present. Mr.
Wegner introsiuced Nlr. Rich Carlson who is the chairman of the Skateboard Park Task
Force. Other Skateboard Park Task Force members attending were: Brendon Schild,
Linda Schild, Dave Momson, Donnie Morrison, Sam Carlson, and )effrey Johnson.
Mr. Carlson updated the Council on the progress of the Task Force. (A copy of the
staff report is on file in the City Recorder's office.) The Task Force has received
information from representatives who are associated with skateboard parks in the area.
These parks included the City of Tualatin and the Chehalem Parks and Recreation
District. There was dlscussion on the subcommittees created: Design, Site Select9on
and Fundraising.
It was noted that the City's insurance costs should not increase because of the
skateboard park; hov6rever, the insurance carrier should be asked for input during the
design process.
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -]ANUARY 15, 2002 page 4
Skateboard parks are low maintenancQ. It was suggested that a board be formed to
review nnaintenance issues.
Fundraising efforts wlll be needed from both adufts and young peoplee Chehalem
Parks and Recreation hired a professional fundraiser. In order to obtain in-kind
contributions, many spectfics must be known concerning what items are needed for a
skateboasd park.
"The Design Subcommittee is working on preparing a short list of potent9al designers
for skateboard park conceptual plans.
The City of Tualatin raised $165,000 for its skatepark and Mr. Carlson said he
thought Tigard could raise more than that.
Mr. Carlson noted that the Skateboard Park Task Force requests Council to consider
allocating up to $20,000 to hire a design and site [ocation consultant. Public Works
Director Wegner advised that funds wouid be available for this allocatian in the Parks
budget. Consensus of Council was to support this request (up to $20,000). Staff
will prepare a pr4posal for formal Councii consideration.
Councir meeting recessed at 7:45 p.m.
Council meeting reconvened at 7:52 p.m.
(Agenda Item No. 3 was considered at this time.)
5. POLICY DISCUSSt0N - SllLL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION
Planning Manager Shields presented the staff report, which is on file in the City
Recorder's office. Ms. Shields reviewed the tentative agenda for the Bull Mountain
meeting scheduled fpr ]anuary 31, 2002. A copy of the tentative agenda is on file in
the City Recorder's office. There was discussion on the Bull Mountain meeting
iogistiu. City Manager Monahan gointed out that often people opposed to issues•are
more likeiy to attend meetings. Council may need to determine how to get input
from the majority of people who live in this area.
Community Development Director Hendryx reviewed timelines for both a 2003 City-
initiated annexation and a 2003 annexation-plan-type annexation. These timelines
are on file in the City Recorder's office.
City Manager Monahan noted that the Council has not yet expressed a positio7 on
whether or not to proceed with annexation of the area. The purpose of the ]anuary
31 meeting is to review informatian and determine whether the City and the residents
desire to proceed with annexation of areas on Buil Mountain.
COUNCIL MEETING MINIITES -)ANLlARY 15, 2002 page 5
In response to a question from Councilor ScheckNa, Mr. Monahan confirned that
Washington County has sstaated in its long-tenn plan that the BuII Mountain area should
join the CEty of Tigard.
Citizen Bev Froude cautioned about presentations conceming par{-, since therE is no
land available for parkland. Councilor NLoore also noted there has been no money set
aside for parks and funding will need to be found for road improvements. Aqr.
Monahan agreed that expectations should not be built up. Councilor Patton said that
it "could not be said enough" that the City has not determined that it wants to annex
any or all parts of Bull Mountain to the Ci-Ly. Mr. Hendrlr~ added tha the area is
bEing built out.
The draft timelines wiil be shared at the ]anuary 31 meeting without dates since the
intent is to show an example. Without dates on the timeiines it would be less likely to
be perceived as a plan already in place.
6. UPDATE ORl METRO IIRBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY EXPANSION
Planning Manager Shields delivered the staff report, which is on flie in the City
Recorder's office. Ms. Shieids referred to charts highlighting the main points of her
presentation. The charts are on flie in the City Recorder's office.
Ms. Shields explained the complex process designed by Metro where several tiers for
possible expansion areas of the IIGB have been identified. The first tier is the highest
priority as the llGB expansion is reviewed. There are three tier-one areas near the
Caty of Tigard reprPsenting a total of 644 acres. Metro has plans to involve the
public through a series of open houses. Nexxt steps for Metro are:
a. Complete Goal 5 work to determine buildable land supply.
b. Review and fnalize population and employment forecasts.
c. Evaluate housing supply/demand, forecast.
d. Estimate growth in Centers.
e. Determine need, land types for Industrial Land.
f. Recommend acreages for open space, parks.
g. Evaluate "subregion" concept.
h. UGB Expansion Alternatives Analysis: review specBfic sites.
7. IIPDATE ON WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIOiVAL CENTER
IMPLEMENTATIOIV STRA7EC',Y PLAN
Community Development Director Hendryx presented the staff report, which is on flie
in the City (tecorder's office. Mr. Hendryx also presented PawerPoint slides
highlighting the main poijits of his presentatirtr, which are also on flie in the City
COl1NC1L MEETING MINUTES -]ANUARY 15, 2002 page 6
Recorder's office. Components of the presentAlon reviewed by Mr. Hendryx
included:
a Recent Timeline
o Regional Context
• Current Metro Initiatives Affecting Regional Centers
• 9ensity Evaluation
• Context for Metro UGB Expansion
@ Potentta! Action Pian
• Imp(ementation Toe(s
• Informationaf Exchange
• How do these initiatives affect Washington Square?
s V+/ashington Square lmptementation Program
e Washington Square Funding Rleeds
• Funding StratQgy
• Creenbelt Development and Funding Strategy
• Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Pian
• Stormwater Management Practices
• Washington Square Implementation Program
• Program Challenges
• Next Steps
There will be a Council hearing on January 22, 2002 to adopt the Regional Center
Plan amendments. Ongoing steps include multiyurisdictional coordination on
implementation and funding issues.
8. UPDATE ON WASHINGTON COllNTY LONG-RANGE TRf,,NSPORTATION
PLAN
Gretchen Buehner, representative on the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) for the
Washington County 7'ransportation Plan presented a report to the Citjr Council. The
Washington County Transportation CAC has been meeting since Novernber 2000.
Ms. Buehner reported that she and )udith Anderson were the two representatives for
the County south of Cooper Mountain. Ms. Buehner advised that she did not feel this
part of the County had been given priority in the County's process.
Ms. Buehner reviewed sorne outstanding issues that were also contained in a letter,
which is on file in the City Itecorder's office. She advised that ±he planning process
will continue for most of this year; it is anticipated the County Commsssion will review
the County TSP in October. ~
A draft TSP report is being prepared by County staff, however, issues brought up by
the CAC wi!l not be included. A facilitator is writing a separate report to attach to
the staff report.
COUNC(L MEETIYVG M1NUTES - JANIIARY 15, 2002 page 7
N1s. Buehner request2d City of Tigard support of the process and its representatives.
She also noted the need to plan for expansion and referred to the urban growth
boundary issues.
9. COUTlCIL LIA!SON REPORTS: None
10. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
• City Manager Monahan reviewe4 a Library Staffing matter. On the ,anuary 22,
2002 Counci! Meetinn Consent Agenda (ltem 3.2), there is an item request3ng
Council approval of Budget Amendment No. 7 to the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002
Budget to add a one-haiF time position to the Library Administration Division.
The purpose of this position 9s to assist the Library Department with additional staff
support to deveiop and disseminate information regarding the proposed new
library and the bond measure.
Library Director Bames described the work that was being performed by Paula
Walker who has been selected for this position.
o City Manager Monahan advised the Council that Washington County has an
option to purchase the Bonita Villa Apartments.
• Mayor Griffith pointed ouY that Council goals should include the task to seek its
own post office so that it is no longer a substation of the Portland Post Office.
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Cancelled.
12. AD]OURNMENT: 9:52 p.m.
. ~
Catherine Wheatley, City Record r
Attest:
.
or, ity o
ate:
1: W DM\CATH11f:CM\020115.DOC
COUNCII. MEETING Ni1NUTES - JANUARY 15, 2002 page 8
USA TODAY • MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2001 • 3A
N1ti0n
IN
u
Red mi( ove-rmtal(es state bim -magets
B1g 5h0rtfdllS, Shortfallsinstatebudgets
bleak economy . eudget shortfall is: ~ expected ~ possible ❑ none reported .
1^ F q VL t~C- t ~t~l
force deep cuts
By Haya EI Nasser r ~ ~ w''°' ~'r : `•°•5. f' r~ , c~
USATODRY
Squeezed by the worst budget
. r;. v~ `4'i " • w,.~~Yh > , • `
crunch in aimost a decade, states are
scrambling to cut spending, avoid rais-
ing taxes and spare education.
It's a tall order for a 8rowin8 number
of states that are taking in less money T_
[han they had budge[ed. Seven gover-
nors have called for emergency legisla-
tive sessions halfway through their fis- ~ OyMlk<Wlntroath.AP
cal years, and several states have Huckabee: Bud et cuts are better than
di ed iRto theit' rain -da funds. Thirty-fve states are renorting they expect budget shortfalls next year; some also
PP y Y raising taxes, Ar nsas governor says.
The bleak economy has been hur[ing expecc thac che shorcage will excend into 2004.
tax revenue for months. As revenue The states and amounts they might fall short borrowfromthestate'ssavingsaccount
tumbled, the cost of Medicaid and pre- a,bama Morc than $78 million Minnesota $600 million to Sl billion and tobacco settlement money.
scription drugs soared. That pinch2d Arizona $1.6billionin2years - Mississippi- $SOmillion ► Illinois, which cut $450 million
sta[es even more. nrkansaz S19.7 million M;ssoui; 5324 million from its budget, is running out of school
; The fiscal picture became bleaker af- calrornia~-- se nuoo co sia n~iiioo ` riebruka nnore crwo $si ~„mion construction money for the 6rst time
i ter the terrorist attacks SeQt. 11, espe- coiorado 5385 million New Jersey $1.9 billion since a state fund was created in 1997.
' cially in states such as Flonda that rely con,,eaiNC 5300 million New York $3 billion The $70 million left in the fund will cov-
heavily on tourism. Now governors say Floriaa S13 billion onio si.s niihon er the needs this year of only the first
they'll need $4 billion in federal aid ceorgia $600 million Oregon szoa million seven schools on a t 85-school waiting
next year to help them guard against ~~ho 553.7 millan Rhode Wand S80 million to $100 million list
possible terrorist attacks. usnois $300milliontoS450mtllion SouthCarolina $soominion ►Arkansas is suspendin college
Indiana^ 5450 million to South Dakota $l t million this year;
According to a survey being released 5600 million 540 million in 200z scholarship programs that wi affect al-
today, 35 states face a total budget taNa ioa ftition Tennessee 5300 million [a $400 mitlion mos[ 4,000 s[udents. The state is aLso
shortfall of more than S25 billion for j(ansu - S90 million - Uiah-~- $177 million cutting pay raises for teachers.
this fiscal year - the worst since 1992. icenmacy 5500 miflion to Vermont $35 million Budget cuts are better than raising
"Chey're all going to have to cut 5700 million v;rgin;, $l billion tdX25, Republican Gov. Mike Huckabee
spending or increase taxes," says Ray Maine S86 million yy~Wngton $800 million says. "I really believe that when you're
Sche ach, e.cecutive director of the Maryiana 5124 million wisconsin $300 million to $13 billion
PP in a recession, raising taxes is like asking
fYational Governors' Association, which Massachuse"5 51.35 billion bY 2004 a bleeding hemophiliac to give blood to
is releasin the surve with the Nation- Mcnigan 5514 million to 5826 million
S Y sauR~:Nanonal~iauonoru.,«suas«om«R:wuu~„icwe,mrs•,~.~ianen theRedCross.°
al Association of State Budget Officers. To needle those pushing for a tax in-
Mos[ states are trying desperately to By DaW Mefrill. USATODAY crease, Huckabee set up a'Tax Me
balance their budge[s without resorting More" fund last month. Anyone who
to tax increases. After years of tax cu[s, If the economy remains safety and schools. The state wants to pay more taxes can "put up or
only a handful of stares, including Ari- weak, there might be deeP- also is eliminating the Com- shut up," he says. The fund has raised
zona and Wisconsin, have raised taxes. er cuts and more talk of rais- mission on Indian Affairs, a$260 so far.
Most of those have raised taxes on sales ing taxes. liaison between tribes and ► California, which planned to ex-
and cigarettes, or they have closed cor- What states are doing: ~t the state. pand Medicaid coverage for low-in-
porate tax loopholes. ► Florida's Legislature ► New Jersey Gov-elect come parents, is delaying doing so undl
"Every[hing's on the table," says Ar- just ended i[s second sPe- Jim McGreevey is consider- Jul 2003.
turo Perez, senior polity specialist with cial session this year with a ing having the state borrow The net result is that more than
the Hational Conference of State Legis- vote to cut $i billion from its up to $2 billion from the 100,000 parents are not going to get latures. "Md given the size of their .$50 billion budge[ - mostly state's federal tobacco set- coverage," says Leighton Ku, senior fel-
shortfall, you would expect everything out of schools, social ser- tlemen[ to help ease an al- low at the Center on Budget and Pfllicy
would be on the table." vices and other Qrograms. Ventura: "Nothing most $2 billion shortfall. Priorities in Washington.
The governors' association's latest School distncts face a is off the table." ► Minnesota Gov. Jesse ► Tennessee, which faces a$300 mil-
survey shows that 43 states and the 2.5% cut in funding, which Ventura has raised the pos- lion to $400 million shortfall, is cutting
District of Columbia report revenue could mean layoffs or unpaid leaves. sibility of taxing goods and services almost $110 million in state services.
that fal(s below forecasts. That means The Department of Juvenile Justice that are not taxed now. Tha[ means pos[poning much-needed
furloughing or laying off state employ- lost 171 Qrobation offcer positions, and Ventura says he will look at cutting repairs to state buildings, says state ar-
ees, delaying school construction and some prison drug treatment and edu- spending in all areas beFore pushing for chitect Mike Fitts, and delaying a
road repair, and lowering benefits for cation programs have been eliminated. a tax increase. "Nothing is off the table," $90 million expansion of the Tennessee
some Medicaid recipients. ► Anzona is trying to erase a budget he says. State Museum in Nashville.
The cuts might ndt end there. As deficit of $1.6 billion over 2 years ► The Ohio Lottery Commission The state also shut down parks, such
state legislatures reconvene in January, through deep cuts in social service pro- might be allowed to participate in a as the Norris Dam State Park in An-
the big worry will be the fiscal 2003 ~rams and prisons, and a 6%cut to near- multistate lottery that could bring in derson County, north of Knoxvitle.
budget, y every state agency except public $41 million a year. Officials also want to "It's bleak," Fitts says.
~
AGENDA T'TEM # ~
FOR ALrENDA OF 1-15-2002
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUNdMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Regional Drinking Water Proposal Discussion
PREPARED BY: Ed We ner , r DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OIC
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
At the Council meeting on January 22, 2002, the City Counc,l will be deciding their position relating to the
continuance in the partnership that is exploring the creation of a regional drinking water supply agency.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff to review the presentation on the Regional Drinking Water Agency Initiative with the
Intergovernmental Water Board members on the next step for continuing with this process.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On Apri125, 2001, the Portland City Council passed a resolution (#35994) directing the Commission to work
with elected officials in the Region to identify and analyze alternative institutional governance arrangements
for water utilities. This resolution also directed the Bureau to provide assistance to the Commission in
working jointly with management staff of other water utilities in pursuit of preferred alternatives.
Two general meetings were held in May and June for elected officials, staff, citizen groups and individual
citizens to discuss the concept of a regional drinking water supply and transmission agency. After this
meeting, staff from the participating agencies began working together to develop criteria, conduct research on
various governance models and develop recommendations. On October 18th a follow up meeting was held
to obtain gublic comment. On November 15, 2001 the staff completed an in depth briefing for elected
officials and representatives on the proposed criteria and analysis of governance models.
The final report to investioate the potential for new arrangements for providing water utility service in the
metropolitan area has been completed. An Executive Summary has been provided to the City Council
members and the IWB members which included a schedule outlining the necessary steps to continue with
this process. To meet this schedule all the current partners are reviewing the recommendations and deciding
whether or not they intend to continue participation in tne creation of a new regional entity. Those partners
who wish to continue will enter into an agreement to complete the next steps and participate in cost sharing
which could reach as high as $25,000, depending upon the participation level.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
e Abandon the possi.biiity of obtaining an ownership/partnership postion in the Bull Run and shift all
energies to completing a new wholesale contract with the City of Portland.
o Continue working with the Joint Water Commission and others to study alternatives for additional
water sources in the Hagg Lake area
.
VISION TASK FORCE GOElL ANJ ACTION COMMITTEE S'TRAT'EGY
Securing a long-term water supply is both a Council and Vision Task Force goal
ATTACHMEN'I' LIST
N/A
FISCAL NO i ES
This water supply option will have a financial impact on the ratepayer o#'the water services area. We are
not yet far enough alang to develop projected costs.
The next step agreement may be a commitment of agencies to proceed with the next steps and contribute
up to $25,000 each towards this effort.
. te SuPPIY
.
1 ~ Ngey peport
1,litiative Prorg,~ .
Tigard CitY COunc"
2002
15 ,
Ianj~
•
Ed WegYler9 Deni's Koettermeter
iI
~i t e
rresentatiOll
~
Schedl-lie
Of Progr SS Peport
~
endatlolas & Coliditioinis f
B,ec~~~ .
),raft Fecommelldaflo
'
ppp-roval of e6~eal Yijjers
Discussioll
opflot
S
Othe'r
Se-liedule
p~.blis~.~d
-~~p~r~
2001 . ~il a~d I~
D .
ece~.~ber 12' Brl.efed C1~ Co~.n
e~d~,~,1o~.
er 1g92001 IWB ~ev l° v~s dra~ xeco~
~
' ew
02 • sesslo~ ta rev~.
~u~,~y 9, ~Q . council wor 1 c
1Y ecO
3~uaq ~Melldaflo'ns
15 g 2002 dr~.f~ & ~ da,tio~.
22 2002 ' a~. o~ ~~~om~-~~.
~1,~i1 a~tl
1~ ~p eportS C1ty tJf
p~
jmuary C1ty Councilor tt°n r
' •
. . phase
2002 T .g~,~d positlo~. o~
~ 1 ~ ~ io~n
artlcipa~
p
G
Draft Recommendatiou
. bined
Tlae CitY t~.~. t~~
" Ti~~ TiSard~ r p Sard, and
s of y ~e~~ I~ ~ resen ~ a5~.' ~ng
jIS ur~ia~ 9 ton
se~. ~
a,x ea r~a ~f
~ce • ~
he ~.nlnco~ •
portions ~ t~e
t .t1~,e participatioll 1
coI1t1
County, e~.ect tO ° of t~1e
• 111~e
~.t~-oR p1~.~1~- e
me~.~
° d InItiatw
~.~~~,1~~ Supply ~
imP
A .o
nal Water ° • .
DTiTKins ~d1~rtons
~
1;~~~ .ect to the follOwg, ~ncv
~~.b~
process~
uj,JU1.DJ111 1 IJ L lU1
u NO
cuuditiO ~
. ~niat~~~
. se
Scope . j~pl~~
cOst
Woirk final • •~erableg t~.e , ~.~11 TWIS
ecte~~~,~de a~ d to pay.
To ~
be e~ ~
ch PartIler ~r1 ill and ~ture
.rIc~ .~de buy tS ~~s~s ~~~o
~h me.~
s~a~.all l
jected er cO fof ea~
prO
tion i Noo 2
Colild
°
naltzattOn-
not to bandon ept Of regto ~ent
~ AgencY ~jc ~~focuS~
the 1 d t~.~ ~
. 0 t~.~,~ ~
a ~
~nd~r~tand .~.~c ~1u~-bia Southshore ~n of ~~.ter_
~~~1 R- t~~ ~re~1
the 1
~~~~rt • al be~e~ts to inclucle
~,s t~.~ ~°i~.a~-c . t~.at •
~111
~~11 Ce S 9 1t is dear e ce
in prillcipa
~ ~~-a~
o ~re ~ . ~S ~ POtenflal
e tha$ the
the Wla~etLe ~ ~e 1~e~.ie'v
d by the public. • shoul~be
e
pt ~~t be uala~. Ytms .
d TTas1,jrT t~m~.
a~ s~m~ ~~re Clackamas
illclusion
~~~sidered for MMgw
uoladitiOll 3
~ci~able
~ orts to develOp eq~ l~z ~
~t. ~
current •
~ r
vlesale co~tracts to be comp~~~~
~h ~'ocess to this projecto parallel eede
.
bY t~.~
c~n~~ ~
oleSale ~ COsts
to t~h
~ie
~
r~ners to com~,
p
~o~. No
in s~.burbp . ~.do ~t.
• 'Co
th.a identmed
~,~~.11 be by 19 200z.
Auj;ust
.
4
Condition No.
uture Phase shall
e W~~~ f~
d~~~t
~ ~
~ ~v~~ki~
include
as ~ deliverable, ~
~t
IGA)
Intergoverninental Agreem (
~ Igo
611he new a,~encya
1 ° ~ it that ° w.
~ll
t~.~t
1~te
The IGA should be c°mp ~l~s,
c
~
osts' operat• o~.
~,ddress governanCe~
etc.
p NO.
B ~
C OudiV1
e
~ S upp IY
eq~i~' -
rS
de fo-r ~t ~ f
~
~ e~ y ~
plew ~ O Provi e~ ~e
~
O"gst
~z
~ . of sale a
~~d ~~~t
SO.6
uoudWIOU .
OFtions
p4ew agetzcy individual e
'l~ keep
nse
i
o
s
i
al dec
open for loc
e ~
Coudibffitlk
°ncludtng
id conside~' ~ u ~ detive ~
e~cy '
e~
New ~~e~
~ to ~o~ or o.
d1strib
ns a~ ~ this olaW
functio ti
• ~s ow
ry 0 i-aclli
s 0
~
~
~QS ~
~~yy.Ly S ►71111r
•
. Future StePs
~.ge t~hat co~t~~~~~ h
a~~~.ovvl~WoUl
~
~a~ d ~a~
sp 000 ~,~d $25,000, rocess
. .~ici~'~ at~.o~ 1~ ,
ageny between $15 ~ ~f ~
.c~-~ . ~ ~.1at~1g
b er
on tl~e nu~.
dependant UP 0
agencies• .
. e ~11~g the a
ar~ ~~~1~ 6 ltio~.s
c~~d
. ~ enc~~~ ~ s 1n~
de'velOP
.~~ndatlon
r~~~~.
of ac~~~~ance ° l 'n tl~e
• ~
~ vv happen s~~t
o~tlatlo.~ o o~ le
~dated•
.
~
future where co~di~ ~e~ tis ~.~e cOns
~ •
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~G
. ~~,~1~
. . ~S p
• a-~~~ ~x~s~~ ~
~ a
~ ~ t
~ w~~~ ~
en~~~~, sta
t~ ~~1.1 .
v ~~~pr~~~se,
~~~at~ ~
~
e ~ ~ 9 ~
~~.dlt~~~.s p g ~ ~
. ~1~~~~ ~ ~ •
tlabl~ fo~r ~
, b~
S~d~~~d t~
~on
44IDe Ujjjer~'
~ IWB
eet~ ~ug Of(from
Condition No* 6 de,5~- s ~1Ou
local
.
Con&fjonNo- 2 .
e eep tS
•
, . m ~~~~~~.a
~-e~~o~.1,~ tQ
' ~za tl~l~-
~ ~urner)
ive (bac
Co '
~ ~~m
~-~~p
C ol.ios~. No • I ~i~~.
.~o ~~,e destT•b.~
o f'O" d~t~~
ibu " ~egat~ ~ate
I)IStf odels
ev a~-~~,te d i1i a s ~p~r~,~~ mmosomm
.
lassimmmmwmwmmm
4
I I' 1W ater
Lou%
.
~ll
.
AGENDA ITEM # ~
FOR AGENDA OF Januarv 15, 2002
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGUN
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Update on Transfer of Juvenile Cases to the Municipal Court
PREPARED BY: N. Robinson Ite DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK
~
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Should juvenile first-time offender cases, currently cited into Washington County Juvenile Department, be
transfened to the Municipal Court?
STAFF RECOIvIMENDATION
Approve a program allowing the Municipal Court to process first-time juvenile offenders for violation level
offenses.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
At the May 15, 2001 study session the Presiding Judge and Court Manager met with Council to review the
annual court report. Most of the discussion centered on the possibility of citing juveniles accused of minor
crimes to Municipal Court, as permitted by legislation passed in 1999 and proposed to us by the Washington
County Juvenile Department in August, 2000. The program would treat the crimes as violations under Oregon
law, thereby circumventing the need for court-appointed counsel. The program would be available only to first-
time juvenile offenders age 14 and older.
Since these initial conversations, court staff has met with Michael Kruger, Washington County Juvenile
Department Supervisor, Larry Blake, Offcer Scruggs and Chief Goodpaster. All parties are in agreement that
, the program offers distinct benefits to the community and to the offenders. The types of cases identified as
appropriate for Municipal Court include: disorderly conduct, simple assaults, minor thefts, trespass, vandalism,
truancy, curfew and tobacco violations. The Juvenile Department will continue to take the drug and alcohol
violations as they have been awarded grant money to respond to these types of cases. The program would have
~ no impact on current Peer Court operations.
r
~ The Police Department's juvenile arrest statistics were reviewed for 1999, 2000 and the first three-quarters of 2001
, to determine what the volume of the caseload might be. T3ased o, these numbers, the Municipal Court could
; increase its caseload by approximately 285 cases per ye.ir.
~
~ Judge O'Brien has provided the Juvenile Department witll a cupy n+' the attached draft Rule allowing the transfer of
I cases. If Council approves the project, the signed Rulc, aloni, with a cover letter to the Juvenile Department, should
be sufficient to transfer jurisdiction of the cases.
. '
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue providing service at the present level. Juvenile offenders would continue to be prosecuted through the
Juvenile Department and the 'I'igazd Peer Court.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMIviITTEE STRATEGY
ATTACHMENT LIST
* Memo
a I1raft Rule accepting the juvenile caseload.
FISCAL NOT'ES
We anticipate staffing and current budget are sufficient to process the additional work.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Bill Monahan, City Manager
rROM: Michael J. O'Brien, Presiding Judge
Nadine Robinson, Court Manager
DA'fE: January 2, 2002
RE: Update on the Transfer of Juvenile Caseload to the Municipal Court
At the May 15, 2001 study session we met with Council to review the annual court
report. Most of our discussion centered on the possibility of citing juveniles accused of
minor crimes to Municipal Court, as permitted by legislation passPd in 1999 and
proposed to us by the Washington County Juvenile Department in August, 2000. The
program would treat the crimes as violations under Oregon law, thereby circumventing
the need for court-appointed counsel. The program (which is described in detail in the
proposed court rule included in your packet) would be available only to first-time juvenile
offenders age 14 and older.
At present, juvenile first-offenders for minor violations receive minimal attention #hrough
the Juvenile Department, often little more than a letter of admonition. The Municipal
Court may have more of an impact on the offenders and their parents. The 1999
legislation provides that juveniles who fail to comply with any conditions imposed by a
Municipal Court can be recalled to Juvenile Court in Hillsboro "for further proceedings."
Repeat offenders, and those charged with drug or alcohol offenses, would not be
eligible for the proposed program; they would continue to be cited directly into Juvenile
Court.
Based on the nature of the offense and the juvenile's record, an officer could cite a
juvenile in4o Municipal Court, Peer Court or Juvenile Court in Hillsboro. The written
criteria for making that determinatian will be developed in greater defail by the City
Prasecutor and Chief Goodpaster. If adopted, the program would have no impact on
existing Peer Ccurt operations, although it would provide an option for juveniles who fail
to comply with any conditions of diversion or probation imposed in peer court.
At the May study session, Council expressed interest in the program and asked that
additional information be gathered to determine its feasibility. -Since these initial
conversations, court staff has met with Michael Kruger, Washington County Juvenile
Departmeri Supervisor, Larry Blake, Officer Scruggs and Chief Goodpaster. Ail parties
are in agreemPnt that the program offers distinct benefits to the community and to the
offenders. The types of cases identified as appropriate for Municipal Court include:
disorderly conduct, simple assaults, minor thefts, trespass, vandalism, truancy, cucfew
and tobacco violations. The Juvenile Department will continue to take the drug and
alcohol violations as they have been aw-qrded grant money to respond to these types of
cases.
The data provided by the police department indicates the program would increase the
court's caseload by approx9mately 285 cases per year. We anticipate current staffing
and budget will be sufficient to process the additional work. If approved, we will
evaluate 4he program's effectiveness with Council at our annual review of court
operations this spring.
Mr. Kruger of the Washington County Juvenile Departmen4 has reviewed the draft Rule
and dees not anticipate that the Juvenile Departmen4 will want to make significant
changes. However, it is possible that some revisions may be proposed following further
discussions with the Juveraile Department and the Presiding Judge of the VWashington
County Juvenile Court. Any proposed revisions will be presented to Councii a# our study
session.
The signed RuOe, along with a cover letter ta the Juvenile Department, should be sufficient
to implement the transfer of jurisdiction under the 1999 legislation.
IN THE vIUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY Or TIGARD
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON
[EZAFT]
In the Matter of )
) No 01-14
JUVENILES ) Supplemental Court Rule
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. STATEMENT OF POLICY: As provided by ORS 419C.370, the Tigard Municipal
Court will adjudicate juvenile violations under the conditions set forth in this Rule. The goals of
the Court in accepting juvenile cases are to provide a local fonun for minor juvenile matters, to
complement programs currently offered by the Washington County Juvenile Court and the
Tigard Peer Court, and to further the policies articulated in ORS 419A.002 and 419C.001.
2. CItYTERIA FOR REFERRALS: The Court will accept cases referred by the Tigard
Police Deparkment and other law-enforcement agencies on the following bases:
a. Offenses classified as violations that are waived to the Court by the Juvenile Court as
provided by ORS 419C370(1)(b);
b. Offenses classified as misdemeanors that are alleged as violations under ORS 161.566
according to criteria developed by the Tigard City Prosecutor and Chief of Police.
The criteria shall be designed to promote the referral of juvenile first offenders to the
Court, while juvenile repeat offenders shall continue to be refened to the Washington
County Juvenile Court.
c. Offenses referred to the Court by the Tigard Peer Court for failure to comply with any
conditions of diversion;
d. Juveniles referred to the Court must be at least 14 years of age.
The following categories of juvenile cases shall not be subject to this rule:
a. Traffic crimes;
b. Juveniles with prior convictions for xnisdemeanors in Juvenile Court or any other
court;
c. Drug and alcohol offenses.
3. JUVENILE PROCEDURES: The Court sha11 designate regular dates and times for
arraignment of juveniles subject to this Rule. Upon receipt of a complaint, the Court shall:
a. Notify the Juvenile Court that a complaint has been received, as provided by ORS
- 419C.370(2)(a);
. ~
b. Upon request from Jnvenile Court, waive the juvenile to that Court for further
proceedings pursuaixt to ORS 419C370(2)(b);
moi
c. As provided by ORS 419C.306 and 419C.374, a summons shall be issued to the
parent or other person having physical custody of the juvenile, requiring the pazent or
other person to appear with the juvenile before the Court at the time and place stated
in the summons. The summons may be served by mailing a copy thereof to the parent
or other persori as provided by ORS 419C.374(3).
d. For all propcrty offenses, the Court shall notify the Juvenile Court of the disposition
of each case as provided by ORS 419C.370(3)(a);
e. For a.ny juvenile previously adjudicated in the Tigard Municipai Court under this
Rule, the Court may waive the juvenile to the Washington County Juvenile Court for
further proc,.;edings.
f. Notify victims, as identified in police reports, of the pendency of the case a.nd the
time set for hearing;
g. If any juvenile fails to appear as summoned, or is placed on probation or diversion
and is alleged to have violated a condition of probation or diversion, the Court shall
notify the Juvenile Court for further proceedings as provided by ORS 419C370(3)(b).
h. Expunction of juvenile records shall be subject to the provisions of ORS 419A.260.
i. Cases in which a juvenile enters a plea of "not guilty" shall be set for trial in the usual
course. Juveniles accused of violations sha11 not be entitled to court-appointed
counsel.
j. Juven'.les referred by the Tigard Peer Court shall be scheduled to appear at a special
hearing to determine an appropriate disposition.
4. DISPOSITION OF JUVENILF, CASES: In order to prevent further law violations,
the Court will seek dispositions based on the following principles:
a. As provided by ORS 419C.001, swift and decisive intervention by the Court for
juvenile first offenders, emphasizing the goals of enhanced public safety and
prevention of further criminal activity;
b. Imposition of appropriate monetary sanctions, including restitution, to promote a
sense of accountability and help deter future criminal conduct;
c. Use of community-based programs, including alternative community service and
other forms of diversion, that seek to rehabilitate the juvenile and enhance awareness
~ of the consequences of criminal behavior; and,
i d. Promote the active and continuing invoivement of parents or legal guardians in every
i phase of the process.
i
~ 5. INDE]PENDENT EVALUA'Y'ION: The Court will assist in any evaluation of its
programs, policies and services by the Washington County Juvenile Court or any other agency
designated by the City of Tigard.
DATED this 15th day of January, 2002.
Michael J. O'Brien, Presiding Judge
Tigard Municipal Court
Juvenile Case Flowchart
Police
Department
Peer 1. First ofiFenders
Court 2• Violations, including minor traffic
3. Minor misdemeanors
Munlcipal 1. First offenders
COUrt 2• Traffic, violations and crimes
3. Misdemeanors - reduced to violations
Juvenile 1. Repeat offenders
2. Drug & alcohol offenses (including DUII)
Department 3. Serious misdemeanors
4. Felonies
AGENBA ITEM #
FOR AGENDA OF 1/15/02
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSLTE/AGENDA TITLE Skateboard Park Update
PREPARED BY: Dan Plaza/Rich Carlson DEPT HEAD OK --~r~ CITY MGR OK'f1 -
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Up@ate the Council on the present status of the Skateboard Pazk Task Force process.
STAFF RECQMMENDATION
No action required
INFORMATION SUNIMARY
The purpose of the agenda item is to update the City Council on the current status of the Mayor's Skateboard
Park Task Force. Several public meetings have been con@ucted. Approximately 80 Citizens have attended
the meetings-half of which are youth. Three sub-committees have been created by the Task Force Chair, Mr.
Richard Carlson. The three sub-committees are as follows: design, site selection and fundraising. Meeting
dates for all three sub-committees are scheduled to occur this month.
OTHER ALTERNATNES CONSIDERED
n/a
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
The creation of this Task Force is directly connected to the City's visioning process in that it addresses
activities for youth in the cammunity. It also is connected to the purpose of Council Goal #2 (to provide
recreation opportunities for all citizen needs). The Mayor's Youth Fonun was created as a result of Council
Goal #2. The Forum is focused on what services are being provided now for youth, and what additional
services are needed for youth (possible skate park). The Mayor created a Skateboard Park Task Force to
study the feasibility of creating a Skateboard Pazk in Tigard.
ATTACHIvIENT LIST
n/a
FISCAL NOTES
IVo definitive costs have been established. This process is in the eazly stages. However, it is planned to
acquire funds through a community fnnclraising campaign. It is projected that some City funding will be
necessary, however to what extent is unknown at the present time.
AGENDA ITEM
FOR AGENDA OF _Januaiy 15, 2002
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUNIlVIARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Annexation Polic Discussion for Bull M un in ea.
PREPARED BY: Julia Ha'duk ~ DEPT HEAD OK l~ Y MGR OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCTL
Discuss the Bull Mountain Aruiexation Study Open House format and issues.
STAFF RECONIMENDATION
N/A
INFORMATION SUMMARY
A follow-up meeting to the July 26, 2001 focus group meeting on the Bull Mountain Annexation is scheduled
for January 31, 2002. The purpose is to present the Bull Mountain Annexation study and to provide an
opportunity for comments and questions. City staff and County held an internal cooraination meeting on
January 3, 2002 to prepare a final recommendation on the format of the meeting for Council's review and
approval. Attached is a copy of the agenda (Attachment 1) and flyer information that is being sent to
participants of the Focus Group meeting and other interested parties (Attachment 2). Staff has also attached a
separate memo discussing annexation processes and providing a hypothetical timeline for the two most likely
processes to be used if the entire Bull Mountain area were to be annexed (Attachment 3).
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not applicable.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Growth and Growth Management Goal #2, Urban services are provided to a11 citizens within Tigard's urban growth
" boundary and recipients of services pay their share.
ATTACHMENT LIST
~ Attachment 1: Agenda for public meeting on January 31, 2002
a
H
Attachment 2: Flyer information sent to participants of the Focus Group meeting and other interested parties
~ Attachment 3: Memo on annexation process and timeline
FISCAL NOTES
N/A
1:\Irpln\ju1ia\annexation/ais 1-15-02.doc
• Attachment 1
TENTATIVE AGENDA FOR BULL 11'IOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEETING. 1/31/02
6:00 O en kiouse
Stations/tables with each City department and the County to answer questions,
notepad5 for residents to write down questions and comments, refreshments.
Councilors will rnin le with ublic.
7:00 'E7i'elcome and Introductions
--Introduce Mayor, City Councilors, County Officials
--1Vlayor ansl County 0lfficials Spealt: Tone of speaking points: pleased to be
presenting study; it's a good thing; next steps taken together; collaborative process
--Overview of toni t's purpose ill Monahan7:10 PowerFoint Overview of the Stud , Annexation Methods
7:25 Town ]Hall Discussion with Facilatator Sara Iiackett
Write comments on flip chardhave a scribe
Discussion Points: 1) What do you think of the study conclusions?
2) What are the remaining issues?
3 What are our next ste s?
8:15 Ad'ourn Town Hall• Direct eo Ie to tables for last uestions
Thank ou, reminder of next ste s
8•30 Ad'ourn
Have form available to allow participants to ask written questions about the study.
\\TIG333\USR\DEPTS\LRPLN\bethWnnexationUan02 OpenHouse\Potential Format for Bull Muuntain Public Meeting.doc
revised 1/3/02
Attachment 2
Tlze City of Tigard and Wasliington County
Cordially Irivite You to the
"Irmqak
U13ULL MOUNTAIN
ANNEXATION STUDY
OPEN HouSE
. THURSDAY, JANLTARY 31, 2002
6:00-7:00 P.M. - OPE1v HOUSE
7:00-8:30 P.M. - TQWN ]FIALL MEETING
Fowler Middle School
10865 SW Walnut Street
Now that the Bull Mountain Annexatzon Study is complete, we want to
share with you what we've learned and get your iriput on what happens next.
Although the Bull Mountairr Annexatzon Study does not determine whether or not
the City will annex Buli Mountain, it raises a numher of additional issues
regarding annexation. We want to address those issues collaboratively through
shared discussions with both residents and the City before the Tigard
City Council makes any decision on how to proceed.
This invitation is being sent to all July Focus Group participants, but
the tneering is open to all interested parties. If you have questions prior to the
meeting, contact Beth St. Arriand, City of Tigard, 503/639-4171, ext. 648.
DIRECTIdNS: Please see reverse side for a map to rowler Middle School.
To Get a Copy of the Study.•
A Download it from the City of Tigard's website at www.ci.tigard.or.us
A Ask for it at the Community Development Couciter at City Hall
➢ Review it at the Tigard City Library and the Community Development Counter
~ :in dl 1312.5 S\C' 1 lall f31\-c1.,'I'tg,:ircl. Ol~ 9-233 (503) G.i~)--~1-1 "['1)I) `i0;i GK-1-'-~'
~
~ ~Y AY'c
V
V t' Op'
~ < ~vurw~noon
t
~ ~d\ n HOiCtT10~TASf
NOK1N DlIU3fA 57
G~ Npµ,R1 0°XpTAST. ~ ~y, GREENBURG
~ q
SL,~p\\~ ~ n~o n
Fowler
tAIddl2
NN
~ Schaol ~
~ Nti~G MtU. OR F Da ~ V •
MOR \
5C, ~a
WAItM ~rj~' 0?
.
W 4f !v~Uy~ sr.
~
~
~
~
. ~
~
a
N
w
d~T
e~
Attachment 3
CITY AF TIGA6tD
Community Development
Shaping A Better Community
M~MORANDUM
ClTlf C)F 't°OGAiZD
TO: Tigard City Council
FROM: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner
DA7E: December 31, 2001
SUBJECT: Annexation process and timeline for possible annexation of Bull Mountain
area.
This memo is intended to provide Council with a general overview and timeline for ,
annexation of the Bull Mountain area. It is assumed, for the purpose of this memo, that
the entire Bull Mountain area will be considered for annexation at the same time, as
opposed to specific areas. Attached is a table (exhibit 1) which identifies fhe methods
to annex contained in ORS 222. In addition to those methods commonly utilized, ORS
195.205 provides an additional method which may be a viable option and is described in
this memo.
While the table shows that there are several ways in which to annex in accordance with
the Oregon Revissd Statutes (ORS), for an area the size of the Bull Mountain area,
there are only 2 likely methods, to be used. Both methods would require an election.
1.) City initiated annexation [ORS 222.111(2)]
2.) Annexation plan [ORS 195.205]
Below is a brief sxplanation of each method, followed by a hypothetical timeline for
processing an annexation under each with the goal of having the annexation complete
and on the City's tax rolls by July 2003. Both timelines are based on the assumption
that staff is directed to begin warking on this immediately and has the resources to
dedicate the time needed for a project of this magnitude.
Citv InBtiated
In a City Initiated annexation, the City Council holds a hearing and adopts a resolution
with findings supporting the annexation. Council then forwards the proposal on to the
voters in the territory to be annexed. Once a majority of the electors in the area to be
annexed are in support of the annexation, the Council would hold another hearing in
accordance with Metro processing requiremerts adopting 4he election results and the
annexation boundaries by ordinance. Voting is by the residents in the territory to be
annexed only. A majority nf all votes cast must be in favor of the annexation in order to
pass, however, there is no minimum voter turn-out requirement.
°roMELaNE FoR 2003 cITv oNITewTED wNa~~XATioN
Citizens in area work with City and Caunty to create solutions to the
outstanding issues in the area (several months to a year, depending ~ NOW
upon work plan)
Council holds hearing and passes resolution identifying reasons the As early as Aug, 2002
annexation is a good idea and forwarding the ballot title to voters
(approximately 1 month prior to filing deadline)
Ballot measure must be filed by local government (approximately 2 As early as Sep, 2002
months prior to election)
Election (March, May, September or November)
As early as Nov, 2002
Council holds hearing, in accordance with Metro processing standards As early as Feb, 2003
and adopts election results and annex.ation by ordinance.
Annexatian complete and to Department of Revenue by March 31 (1 As early as Mar, 2003
~ month to 90 months - delayed effective date) (Depends on election
~ r1atP)
i i Annexation is on City's tax rolls July 1st As early as July 2003
I
f
Annexation Plan
ORS 195.205 to 195.220 allows annexation utilizing an annexafion plan for areas in an
urban growth boundary. An annexation pian acts as a contract between the City and
the citizens in the area. ORS 195.220 states that an annexation plan must include the
following inforrnation;
e iiming and sequence for annexation,
• local standards of urban service availability required as a precondition of annexation,
o planned schedule for providing urban seniices to the annexed territory
• the effects on existing urban service providers and
e the long-term benefits of the annexation pfan. •
An annexation plan method of annexation requires a majority of electors in Tigard and
the territory to be annexed to support the annexation plan. This provides for a single
majority, which means thaf if a majority of the City residents wanted to annex the area,
even if the majority of voters in the area to be annexed were not in favor, the area would
be annexed (and vice versa). A majority of all votes cast must be in favor of the
annexation in order to pass, however, there is no minimum voter turn-out requirement.
YlMELIBdE FOR 2003 ANAlEXA'TIOlN PLAN TYPE ANImEXA"f'ION
Citizens in area work with City and County to create solutions to the
outstanding issues in the area and develop annexation ptan area
(several months to a year, depending upon work plan) ~ NOW
City Council holds a hearing and passes resolutidn forwarding
annexation plan to electors of the City and the Territory to be annexed. As early as Aug, 2002
Baii'ot measure must be filed by local government ( apprflximately 2 As earl
months prior to election) y as Sep, 2002
Election (March, May, September or November) As early as Nov, 2002
If majority of votes cast favor the annexation plan, the Council adopts
Ordinance or resolution proclaiming adopting of the annexation plan As early as Jan, 2003
Annexation of particular tracts shall take effect in accordance vyith the F-Pe ends on Plan
annexation plan. P
Annexation complete and to Department of Revenue by March 31 (1 Depends on Plan (3-31-
month to 10 months - delayed effective date) (Depends on election 03 for next tax rolls)
~iatPl
Annexation is on City's tax roHs July 1st July 2003
In order 4o utilize the annexation plan method, detailed urban secvice providar
agreements are required to be negotiated betvveen the County and all providers of
urban services in the area. There €s a possibility that the County has not completed this
yet, in which case, the annexation plan metHod of annexation could not be utilized until
these agreements are complete. There is no reason, however, #hat the deveiapment of
an annexation plan can not take place now, with the processing and election at a later
date once all outstanding criteria issues are resolved.
In summary:
• These are generalized timefines - no specific detai(s
e This represents an aggressive approach
• Considerabie resources must be avaitable to implement the timelines
I:Irp(nJjulia/annexation/annexaBon process and Umoline memo.doc 12/27/01
~
Bull Mountain Annexation Study
IVIETHODS OF e4NNEXATiON PROi/IDED F3Y ORS CHAPTER 222
Method: Prior Election Election
, consent requirement within requirement
requireci? Ci#y? withirt territory
to be annexetl?
City Initiated - By the legislative body of the City, on its NO NO (City charter does YES
own motion [ORS 222. i 11(2)] (reguires public hearrng not require, but
and Ordinance which wrll set elecfion and effective date Council can send fo
upon passage) election if desired)
Subject to referendum
Owner Initiated - By petition to the legislative body of YES NO (City charter does YES (if prior
the city by owners of real property in the territory to be not require, buf consent of
annexed. [ORS 222.111(2)] (requires public hearrng and Council can send to electors and land
Ordinance which w'll declare the ferritory annexed upon elecfion if desired) owners is not
conditron that a majority of votes cast in the territory provided, as
being annexed favor annexation or as described in a, b Subject to referendum described in
or c be/ow) subsection a, b or
c below, prior to
action)
a. 100% Owner and Maiority of Electors - by YES NO NO
written consent to annexation by all the owners
of land and not less than 50% of the electors, if Subject to referendum
any, in the territory [ORS 222.125]
b. Triple Majority - by written consent to annex YES NO NO
of more than half of the owners of land in the
territory who also own more than half of the land Subject to referendum
in the territory and of real property therein
representing more than half of the assessed
value of all real property in the territory [ORS
222.170] (Triple majority discouraged because it
may not be constitutional)
c. Double Majorilv - by written consent of a YES NO NO
~ majority of the electors in the territory along with
; the written consent of property owners of more Subject to referendum
~ than half the land area in the territory. [ORS
i ~ 222.170(2))
I Island annexation - When territory not r,vithin a city is NO NO (City charfer does NO
~ surrounded by the corporate boundaries of the city, or by not require, but
' the corporate boundaries of the city and the ocean shore Council can send to
or a stream, bay, lake or other body of water, except election if desired)
when the territory not within a city is surrounded entirely
by water. [ORS 222.750] Subject to referendum
TENTATi1/E ACaENDr4 FOR BdJLL MOULVI'AIN PUBLIC MEETING 1/31/02
6:00 Open House
Stations/tables with each Gity department and the County to answer questions, notepads for
residents to write down questions and comments, refreshments. Councilors will mingle with
ublic.
7:00 Welcome and Introductions
--Introduce Mayor, City Councilors, County Officials
--Niayor and County UffiCiaLs Speak: Tone of speaking points: pleased to be presenting
study; it's a good thing; next steps taken together; collaborative process
--Overview of toni ht's ur ose Bill Monahan
7:1 U PowerPoint Overriew of the Study, Artnexation Methods (Jirra Hendryx)
7:25 Town Hall Discussion
Write camments on flip chart/have a scribe
Discussion Points:
1) What do yau think of the study conclusions?
2) What are the remaining issues?
3 What are our next ste s?
8:15 Adjourn Town Hall; Direct people fo tables for last questions
Thank ou, reminder of next ste s
8:30 Adjourn
! ' 1 1 ~ P ' ' •
Citizens in area work with City and County to create solutions to the outstanding issues in
the area (several months to a year, depending upon work plan) ~OW
Council holds hearing and passes resolution identifying reasons the annexation is a good qs early as Aug, 2002
idea and forwarding the ballot title to voters (approximately 1 month prior to fling deadline)
Ballot measure must be filed by local government (approximately 2 months prior to election) E early as Sep, 2002
Election (March, May, September or November) FAs early as Nov, 2002
Council holds hearing, in accordance with Metro processing standards and adopts election As early as Feb, 2003
resuits and annexation by ordinance.
Annexation complete and to Department of Revenue by March 31 (1 month to 10 months - As early as Mar, 2003
delayed effective date) (Depends on election date)
Annexation is on City's tax rolls July 1 st As early as July 2003
Citizens in area work with City and County to create solutions to the oufistanding issues in
the area and develop annexation plan area (several months to a year, depending upon ~NOW
work plan)
City Council holds a hearing and passes resolution forwarding annexation plan to electors As early as Aug, 2002
of the City and the Territory to be annexed.
Ballot measure must be filed by local government (approximately 2 months prior to election) ( qs early as Sep, 2002 _
Election (March, May, September or November) f As early ac Nov, 2002
If majority of votes cast favor the annexation plan, the Council adopts Ordinance or ps early as Jan, 2003 I
resolution proclaiming adopting of the annexation plan
Annexation of particular tracts shall take effect in accnrdance with the annexation plan. Depends on Plan ~
Annexation complete and, to Department of Revenue by March 31 (1 month to 10 months - Depeiids on Plan (3-
delayed effective date) (Depends on election date) 31-03 for nexf tax rolls)
Annexation is on City's tax rolls July 1 st July 2003:1
AGENDA ITEM # ~
FOR AGENDA OF January 15, 2002
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COLP4CIL AGENDA ITEIvI SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE U date on Metro Urban Growth Boundarv Ex sion
PREPARED BY: Barbara Shields I.)EPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK
WAN-
_4~~ ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Staff will update Council on Metro's approach in evaluating a regional assessment of the need for an expansion
of the Urban Growth Boundary and an Alternative Analysis Study to evaluate Iocations for the potential
expansion.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
N/A. Review only.
INFORMATION SUIVIlVIAF<Y
As part of Metro's Periodic Review Work Program, Metro determined a classification of tiers of land to study
for expansion of the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). Periodic review is a process by which the Oregon Land
Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) works with Iocal governments and residents to review the
government's work. The goal is to make sure Metro's land use work, specifically in regard to UGB, compiies
with state land use pIanning goals. The UGB is required to have a 20-year supply of urbanizable land inside its
borders.
The Metro Council approved the Alternative Analysis Study, which includes the tiers of land for expansion, at
the meeting on December 13, 2001. Metro picked about 100,000 acres as potential study areas for possible
inclusion in the Urban Growth Boundary. The Metro Council is scheduled to make a final decision on the UGB
expansion by December 2002.
At the City Council meeting on January 15, 2002, staff will briefly discuss the approach taken by Metro in
evaluating locations for the potential UGB expansion.
O'PHER ALTERNATNES CONSIDERED
N/A
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION CONiMITTEE STRATEGY .
I:\LRPLN\Barbara\Metro\UGB\1-15ugbecreport.doc
s
t.
Growth and Growth Management Goal #2, Urban services are pro•vided to all catizens within Tigard's urban growth
boundary and recipients of services pay their share.
i ATTACHMENT LIST
None.
FISCAL NOTES
N/A
I:\LRPLN\Barbara\Metro\UGS\1-15ugbccreport.doc
■
STRO UDY .
. %SION
. A
UGS ~g.
.
izable la"d . ~n v
^ ~ar $upp~y a' u- b~n
. n~~e
~
State ~ to ma'~'tain a 2~ y ~,nd desi9
•
, ~a`~ req~~res ~etro ety eVe~ 5 ye~rs
~etro juture
nstrate this capac
mus~ ~em~
lands i# needed' ~e
expa~~10n iete by De
T~~~ pro~ mberZp42
rlp
ess rr'ust be co alwo
0 •
• ~ for entire vGB or. ~ty, baSed on #ac
`
. cres under reVeew in order 01 pri
, g0,Qao to 10~ ~~0 eX ansion land~
• d Qte~~.iat u~~ on ~iers '~-4.
Metro c1a~ss~f1e ~P ~S~~ation •
a ~ S~~d~
~efi.ro C land
nd jorest land p ouncil direCted t . 4 the least. ber 2001, ands for inclusi~on, ~;8;
T v ju~~ to studY
, `n De~~~ rior~ty ~ the l9
e the higheSt p lands in
.er.~ would b n~, to in~lude ~h~~~
~ n~t ~e~i~~e~ . ►
a ~.s rnte
, Metra h~ ~tize them •
a~d reor
~ ~ I ' u,
~n
UGIa ~
A* I
, SSIV'CX
. ~ CU
LX lue)
EFV land va
~e vG,~ and
~
- n~,5 cont~gu°us to X~~ption tan~ eCed e~
, E~,~~ption la ~o~~ded by e vGB, vV~ll b'~ ~°~°s~id
~er ~ Gompletely Sur 'the current
rce kan~ ~ha~, is
uQUs t0 tIgu°us ~~lows
'or~ti~ con
tion landS esou t that
Tae~ '~A= EX~ep ron Occurs °n C sh~ngton Gaun y
~~~ans uCCe tand 'n ~ a
n~n'Ces° CeS to adlacen,
, . dWmargin aoelaings ~a~'~S U land
~►er ~n EF ovide'PUbV1c serv►
be needed t~ pr
~e land t~'~'t may ~he II (m°St
some Class
e~ . ►er 3 ° Re ~°u~ land II added to ~ and
o,~ d 1v ,
~ cept► an
111
Class
ils, ►~ag°c~ty district
. • ~lix ol So o Irrigatlon
To~~ 4' roductlven~~
P
~
~o--
~ DI s
UGS ~
ME-TVAODOLO
' es, in ~~nsid~Cataon:
. e ~ Qi land typ order 01
0" Sta~,e rank~n~
. ~~Se~
exception lands.
1
MaCginal kands' r~s~ry land•
2. icultuve and lo
3. P`gC ed the 10110wrnge
~o a0so ~ons~d~~ irom S'tudy . Over
e Nlet ~`~e~ ~,~aturesemovin~ th~m s w;th slop~S
• ~~~odpla~nss r ~em~ving aCea
2 ~~~ep slopeS~m Study .
3. erG~~t fr `~nd~, ~oi~.h a
z5 p .~~,~g witt 1er t twer .
t~er, beg'n
hased by ~~g lands in
will be p t~e
chooS
°
before t~iza~ao~
ar~a a~~~~d Aq, aOrba~ ices }
.-T~e study, mus~, be eX~ . Cia ~rorn G°al ub eC facah~.ies a~
ef p~iorliy Grlte
h~9h ~e~ded' ria inelude p
tier cultural land
d tha►n c~oose . Crite ~i
is rnoCe la ~e's to ten~'io" Qi a9
th~re ines ~h~~1 pa 01 land us~s, re
deter►~Um e1fic;ency
,~a~~m
j
~I3 EXp ~C-A ORS
t3
F
~
. • ' • s in ~COX~~~ty
: 644 p,cres
ne b~~ldable
de.~er ~and
. . ►n~
~ ~oCV to ent lQrec~,Sts
'
'amPkete
G~~ ion and emp1Qy
1. o~utat
. ~nd fin~lize P
e\
jlew and , {Oteca~t
2• R~ Suppty~ ~dem
valuate h°us~ng
4. E~ centers d
tirnake 9fOwvl tndus~.r~a1 ~-~'r►
land iypes ~or
termlne ne~d' S 'ce, P~'C~s
~or Open P
5. pe es
m~~~d a~rea9
~i. Re~° „ concept sijes
Sp~~
uate "s~'b'e4'On a\ys,is•. review
7 • ~rn~,tiv~s A'~
~~pa~sion A't
8 ~GB
AGENDA ITEM # ~
FOR AGENDA OF January 15. 2002
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGEIVI)A ITEM SUMMARY •
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE _ Update on Washin on Square Reg,ional Center Plan Implementation Program
PREPARED BY: Barbara Shields DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK W ~vr
ISSLTE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Staff will update Conncil on the Washington Square Regional Center Plan Implementation Program and receive
comments from Council.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
N/A. Review only.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
At the August 21, 2001, meeting, Council directed staff to move forward with the implementation process of the
Washington Square Regional Center Plan, Phase II, Implementation. Although Council approved the PIan and
related Comprehensive Plan and Code amendments in February, 2000, Council delayed enactment of these
documents until Phase II addressed a number of issues related to transportation, stormwater, natural resources,
parks and open space. At the August 21, 2001, meeting, Council directed staff to coordinate a meeting between the
City of Beaverton and Washington County, recognizing the multijurisdictional nature of the Plan.
On December 3, 2001, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Code
amendments based on Task Force recommendations related to Phase II, Implementation of the Washington Square
Regional Center Plan.
Staff is coming back to Council to discuss the major issues of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan
Implementation Program at the January 15, 2002, meeting. A PowerPoint presentation wi11 focus on (1)
, discussing the City's approach, efforts, and available implementation tools in the regional context; (2) multi-
~ jurisdictional coordination efforts initiated by the City; and (3) the major elements of the Washington Square
~ Regional Implementation Program.
~
~ On January 22, 2002, Council is scheduled to review the Washington Square Regional Center Plan package,
; including a resolution implementing the Plan.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
N/A
I:\LRPLN\Sarbaraiannexation\1-15ccreport.doc
~
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMIT'TEE STRATEGY
Growth and Growth Management Goal #1: rrowth while protecting the character and livability of new and
established areas, while providing for natural environment and open space throughout the community; Strategy # 3:
Address planning and growth issues associated with Regional Center.
ATTACHMENT LIST
None. °
FISCAL N0TES
N/A .
i:\LRPI+N\sarbara\annexation\1-15ccreport.doc
o ~
a ~
e e Recent Timeline
. ■
° Washin t0il ~J uare s Julv 2001: Washington Squar2Task Force
~ g G ~ forwards Phase II SummaryReporl:
• Regionai Center Plan o Aua. 26, zooi: City Council, Planning
; lJpdate ~ Commission review report, direct staff:
■ • il go forward with implementation process
a ~ 2) coordinate implementation efforts with
~ City Council ;
January iS, 2002 Beaverton and Washington County
o ■
■ ■
■ ■
s 0
■ ■
■ ~
; Recent Timeline o Regional Context
. o
; Dec. 3. 2001: Planning Commission o o As we approach implementation, must
o hearing on Comprehensive Plan and ; consider regional efforts under way
m Development Code Amendments; m
e recommends adoption ~ ■ As a Regional Center, Washington
■ ■ Square is affected by regional
; Jan. 22, 2002: City Council hearing o Qolicy and initiatives
o to implement Washington Square ;
e Regional Center Plan ; o Current Metro analyses focus on
m B regional growth, the impact of regional
e ~ centers and their implementatlon
e ■
m ■
s Current Metro Initiatives a Density Evaluation
v Affecting Regional Centers :
o Regional Centers should accommodate
~ 1. Evaluate Density ln Reglonal a hlgher denslty, mlxed-use development
~ Centers/UGB Expanslon Context : e Hlgher denslty in Reglonal Centers
m 2. Potentfal Regional Center Actlon Plan : should = less need for UGB expanslon
0 3. Implementatlon Tools for Regional o m July 2001 Metro Study flnds Centers not
Centers ■ meeting denslty goals, due to
: 4. Info Exchange wlth Local Jurisdlctfons ~ (1) site, (2) market Issues
m e
■ ■
s ~
1
a
■ B
0 Density Evaluation o Density Evaluation
~ o
m °e Market Issues
: S~e Issues :
■ m
• • High Cost of Financial Higher Density Timing
0 0 SWctured Feasibility Construcbon
e Environmental Limiled Inhaslructure Small Parcel o Padcing Cost
~ Constraints Vacant Land Consfrainls Sizes a
e m
e • Retum on Scale o(
~ ~ Risk Development
w ■
m o
■ ■
0 0
e e
~ Gontext for Metro UGB o Potential ACtion Plan
~ Expansion o ■ Revisit N1TIP funding criteria
m Centers are critical to Regional Growth ~ m Solicit State
~ Management: e
■ ■ ■ Prioritize Regional Cenrers
~ ■ Region must aggressively pursue :
o growth in Centers m e Establish information exchange
o ■ Limit UGB expansion for Commercial m n Establish Technical Assistance service
0 outside Centers ~ o Develop parking, infrastructure fund
e ■ Target Commercial in Centers a e promote development of Centers
r ■
■ m
; Implementation Tools ; Informational Exchange
s m Urban Renewal B o Metro meets regularly with
■
s ~ State Funding °m jurisdlctions
m e Land Assembly m e Share experiences with Centers
~ ■ Targeted Infrastructure o ■ Discuss vlabflity of implementation
■ ° tools
a m Transit Improvements e
m o
o e Place Public 8uildings in Centers o
■ ■
e a Develop Regional Economic Program e
e ■
2
e ■
; Fiow do these initiatives a Washington Squarz
~ affect Washington Square? ~ Implementation Program
~ m Potential new funding mechanisms for ~ a Wiil Implement Adopted Plan
m implementation ~
e o e Prioritizes projects, creates timelines
; s Limited UGB expansion could increase ! OutUnes eneral ste s, schedule
B g P
o commercial redevelopment demand o
o e and sequence of four main activities:
B ■ Better communication, coordination ■
S ~ Iundlnp On~nDSlt Tnnsportatlon 8tormw~Mr
■ between jurisdictions ~ Pro pnm D~wlopmont Dn-E Man~p~m~nt
0 ■ Manapem-l Pr~aHO~•
a m Full effects yet to be seen ;
m ■
e ■
; Washington Square ; Funding Strategy
e Funding Needs a R ional
e ~
• e ■ Transportation $316-122 million m
o e e MTIP, Hwy 217 Study
; e Stormwater/Natural ° v Local
° Resources $15-18 million : . LID, TIF, SDC, Local Fee
■
a :
■ o Greenway,Parks Assessments
o
; Open Space $13-21 million s ■ Urban Renewal Plan Assessment
■ o
: TO'TAL NEED $144-161 million :
~ e
v m
■ ■
~ Greenbelt Development ; Transportation Demand
e and Funding Strategy m Management (TDM) Plan
B o]oint effort for Public Works and 0 q Cooperative effort: jurisdictions,
: Community Development : stakeholders, businesses
o ■
m m Metro Council to consider amendment ; o Further study: parking supply/demand
a to Regional Treil System in March o ■ Incremental lmplementation
~ m Greenbelt concept development: ~ o Short term improvements
o multi-jurisdidional effort a
a p Possible State assistance e s Long-term advanced strategles
0 0
3
■ a
0 Stormwater Management A ashingtan Square
. .
: Practices ; mplementation program
. m
~ ■ Internal Coordination Group o Program Development
■ o
; ■ Engineering, Community Development ; s All departments meet regularly in new
m e
■ Action Plan Development City Internal Coordination Group
m a
■ e s Regional Coordination meetings begun
e a
m B e Presentatfons to Beaverton, Washington
■ ■ Courity, Metro
■ ■
■ ■
e ■
e ■
; Program Challenges ; Program Chailenges
o .
~ Define Citv's Reqional Leadership Role: B Define Task Force Role in Im lementation
: 0 Metro wants to hear from local m Some Possibi/ities•
e jurisdictions on implementation o o Periodic meetings
e ■ Start subregional discussion on : m Consult on Implementation Prngrem
o funding strategy ; development
~ ■ Focus on priorities o ■ Advocates for regionai, state project
funding
■ ■
e ■
s a
m
a Next Steps
0
.
~ Jan. 22. 2002: Council hearing to adopt
~ Regional Center Plan, amendments
■
■
e On4oing, Multi-jurisdictional coordination
~ on impiementation, funding issues
; ■ Internal Coordination Meetings
~ ■ Multi-jurisdictional Meetings
a
B e Funding Summit
■
a
4
AGENDA ITEM # ~
FGR AGENDA OF _Januarv 15. 2002
CITY OF TIGAR.B, QREGflN
CiJ~'iJi1CIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Washington Countv Transportation Svstem Plan (TSP) Comments from Cirizen
AdvisorY Committee
PREPARED BY: Julia Hajduk ~ DEPT HEAD OK ITY IvIGR OYC
IScUE BEFORE THE CbUNCIL
Lister. to Gretchen Buehner's testimony on the Washington County TSP.
STAFF RECOMMLNDATION
N/A
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Gretchen Buehner asked to be given time to present inforrnation on Washington County's TSP so that Council
could be aware of potential issues and provide comments to the County prior to formal review.
OTHER ALTERNATNES CONSIDERED
N/A
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Transportation and Traffic, Goal #2 - Imprave traffic flow.
ATTACHMENT LIST
NA
FISCAL NO'I'ES
IV/A
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable IVlayor & City Councii
FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder~~m"T
RE: January 15, 2002, City Council Meeting - Agenda Item No. 8
DAYE: January 14, 2002
Attached is a letter submitted by Gretchen Buehner for Agenda Item No. 8 on the
January 15, 2002, City Council meeting agensia. Community Develupment Department
staff also received a copy of this ietter for their review.
I:WDMICATFMCOUNCIL\TRANSMI"fTAL - G BUEHNER LETTER FOR 1-15 MTG.DQC
s
GRE'Y'CgiEN E. BiTEHNER Cc) ~~i l Io2
P.O. Box 1233 Co
Portland, Or 97207-1233
aaGaRD
(503) 684-1031 ar 524-5200
FAX (503) 5904205
January 10, 2002
The I-ionorable Mayor
and City Councilors
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregan 97223
Re: Washington County Transportatian Plan
Report from Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)
This meno is to provide you with a brief background to prepare you for my presentation next Tuesday. The
Washington County Transportation CAC has been meeting since November, 2000. Judith Anderson and I
are the two represeirtatives for the courny south of Cooper Mowrtain. Both of us were in leadership
positions in CPO 4k when CAC members were solicited. Y moved into Tigard in early 2001
11ie CAC's task was and is to develop detailed recommendations for the Cowity's Regional Transportation
Plan for the next 20 years. The CAC has been meeting manthly or twice mmnhly over the urtervening
months to develap the infoYmation necessary to make the requested recommendatians.
There were two series of open houses to allow public input about a:rariety of issuas. 'i'he single biggest
issue raised by chizens of south county was "~vhat about the westem by-pass to hetp 99W?". When Ms.
Andeeson and I raised the issue of a major north south arterial at the CAC, a storm of pratest ensued.
Certaua members of the CAC did nat wam to d'ascuss the issue. The issue of north-south connactivity to
south county cantinues to be cornentious.
It became clear early on that transportation nceds for south coianty had a lower priority during comrnittce
discussions. During a recent meeting with Commissioner Tom Brian, I stated 4hat south county has been the
donor for the rest of Washingtcm County in the transportation area. The CAC was provided with a map of
roads and intersectians with a service level of "F" (failure)and suggestions of how to improve theLn. A
disproportianate share of the "F" roads are in sou4h county. Unlike roads in ather parts of the cowity, there
were no solutions fo.r most of them. 'd'here was no respozise to our request of why.
In mid-swnmer Ms. Andersan and I requested that the "by-pass" issue be revisited in light oF substantial
changes in the assumptions upon which the original decision was made. Other options besides a freeway
had been included. All the publicity and political upset had been about the freeway ogtion. Over the next
three months Judith and I attempted to educate the ather committee members about the issues and problems
in south county and get a presentation. One CAC member was extrennely effective in diverting the
cliscusseon. Finally, after it was too late for timely incIusion of this issue in the draft plan, there was a brief
presentation on the issae in November. A majority of the committee requested new paputation modeling by
METRO. This has not been done. Nothing about this issue is included in the draft plan. Nathing is
meiitioned about the study plan approved portion betwaen I-5 and 99W.
~
BY-PASS S'CUDY ASSUMPTIONS. In 1989, Oregon wvas just coming out of recessicn. Grawth
projec4ions for th01990-2010 periad were basad upon a slrnvly recovering economy. The stiady an4icipated
modsrate grovvth in the Tigacd, Tualatin and Sherwaod areas. For example, the 2010 population for
Sharwoad would be around than 10,000 and Tigard about 40,000. Little UGB expansion wquld bo naeded,
therefbre expansion of existing major arterials for north south connectivity beycxad Beavertan and Tegard
would not be viable. Thoce assumptians were not adjusted prior tr the comysletion of the By-Pass Study.
Obviously, Yhe ecanoiny and gravvth toak off during the 1990's. South county commimities have already
met or passed the origuia12010 population projectians. 'Yhere are two pending applications for expansion of
the tJGR, which would substaatially impact 'I'igard and its taaffic neods. 1VIETRO councilors meu4ioned
addational expansion between Wilsanville and Taalatin in the 2002 review.
On IDecember 4, 2001, the Washington County transpnitation staflF inailed CAC members the first draft of
the Washington County Transporeation Plan. This first draft was discussed briefly at the CAC's next
maeting on December 12'. Staff charged commit2ee members to review the draft plan in depth and peovide
feedback to staff for the second draft ta be presented at the a►ext meeting on danuary 16'. 7"he Draft Plan is
to be available to the pubiic in early Febnuary, with hearings to be held in .April.
I will discuss major issues raised in the draft and show you the draft maps for transportation developmem
for the period through 2020. Tha draft indicates major improvernents to east west connectivity, particularly
narth of'T-V Hwy. There are several improvements to euiseing north south roads and praposals for new
north south roads from axtreme north county and ending at Cooper Mouatain.
OUTSTANDING ISSUES
1. Ahematives to rush hour traffic
2. Extensions of north south cannectors
3. A major arterial from Hillsboro 4o I-5
4. Improvements to ease cangestion on 99W get through freight trucks off 99W
5. Mutti-modal transportation
6. What about south county "F" roads
7. Planning for areas caming irrto UGB around Bu1111Rountain south of Tualatin/Shexwood
Ms. Anderscsn and I have been meeting with neighborhood groups and cities around sou4h county since mid-
December to d'ascuss this draft in order to bring the most complEte input back to the CAC on the 16'. I
appreciate this opportuni4y to matce this presentatian to the Councii and look forward to 4aking your input
back to the CAC for inclusion in the Plan.
Very truly yours,
r4~ (f 9"
Gretchen E. Buehner