City Council Packet - 06/27/2000
Dk1&JA AL
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
JUNE 27, 2000
COUNCIL MEETING WILL NOT DE
TELEVISED
rladmyolccpktldoc
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 654-2772
Revised 6/21 /00
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
BU$INESS_'MEETING
)UNE 27,- 2000: 6:30 PM CITY OF TIGARD
TIGARD CITY..HALL
131'25 SW HALL BLVD.
TIG,"-ARD, OREGON 97223
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s).
If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda
item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set
for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager.
Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present
by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard
in any order after 7:30 a.m.
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be
scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please
call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the
Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
® Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;
and
® Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow
as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m, on the
Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above: 639-
4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 27, 2000 - PAGE 1
AGENDA
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
JUNE 27, 2000
6:30 PM
• STUDY SESSION
> EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session
under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), (f) & (h) to discuss labor
relations, real property transactions, exempt public records, and current and
pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are
confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those
present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session,
but must not disclose any information discussed during this session.
> Management/Confidential/Supervisory Classification/Compensation Study -
Benefits Recommendation
7:30 PM
1. BUSINESS MEETING
1.1 Call to Order - City Council 8z Local Contract Review Board
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
7:35 PM
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please)
7:40 PM
3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted
in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be
removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to:
3.1 Approve a Resolution Adopting the Management/Confidential/Supervisory
Group Pay Plan Effective July 1, 2000 - Resolution No. 00 -
3.2 Approve a Resolution Authorizing Refinancing and Additional Interim
Financing for the 69' Avenue Local Improvement District - Resolution
No. 00 -
• Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested
to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered
immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need
discussion.
COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 27, 2000. PAGE 2
7:45 PM
4. PUBLIC COMMENT - APPROVE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001
a. Staff Report: Engineering Department
b. Open Public Comment (Proponents, Opponents)
C. Close Public Comment
d. Council Questions or Comments
e. Council Consideration: A motion to approve the capital improvement program
for fiscal year 2000-2001
8:00 PM
5. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDER RATIFYING RESOLUTION NO. 00-31, A
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS,
DECLARING THE VALOREM TAX LEVY AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS
PROVIDED BY ORS 310.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001
a. Public Hearing Opened
b. Summation by Finance Department
C. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents)
d. Staff Recommendation
e. Council Questions or Comments
f. Public Hearing Closed
g. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 00 -
8:10 PM
6. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN ELECTION ON
NOVEMBER 7, 2000, TO SUBMIT TO THE VOTERS THE QUESTION OF
CONTRACTING A GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDED INDEBTEDNESS IN
THE AMOUNT OF $16 MILLION TO FINANCE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
a. Staff Report: Engineering Department
b. Council Questions or Comments
C. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 00 -
8:20 PM
7. CONSIDER AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH WASHINGTON
COUNTY, PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS
FOR THE CITY AS PART OF A PROJECT OF THE COUNTY'S MAJOR STREETS
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
a. Staff Report: Engineering Department
b. Council Questions or Comments
C. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 00 -
COUNCIL AGENDA -.DUNE 27, 2000 - PAGE 3
8:25 PM
8. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) - ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO
ALLOW DAYCARE USES IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES (ZOA) 1999-0003
The applicant is proposing a Zone Ordinance Amendment to change the City of
Tigard Community Development Code to allow daycare uses outright or conditionally
in all industrial-zoned properties. LOCATION: All Industrial Zones, Citywide.
ZONES: Light Industrial, I-L; Industrial Park, 1-P; and Heavy Industrial, 1-H.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 108.3080
and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Policies 5 and 12.3; The Metro 2040 Plan; and
Statewide Planning Goals 2 and 9.
a. Continue Public Hearing from April 25, 2000
b. Declarations or Challenges
C. Summation by Community Development Department
d. Public Testimony (Proponents/Opponents)
e. Staff Recommendation
f. Council Questions or Comments
g. Close Public Hearing
h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 00-
8:45 PM
9. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING BUILDING, PLUMBING,
MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PERMIT AND RELATED FEES
a. Staff Report: Community Development Department
b. Council Questions or Comments
C. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 00 -
9:15 PM
10. PUBLIC HEARING - SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000
a. Public Hearing Opened
b. Summation by Finance Department
C. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents)
d. Staff Recommendation
e. Council Questions or Comments
a f. Public Hearing Closed
g. Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 00 -
i
{
I~
i
1
COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 27, 2000 - PAGE 4
' e
9:25 PM
1 1. INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING - SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT
DISTRICT NO. 18 - SW WALNUT STREET AT THE INTERSECTION WITH SW
121sT AVENUE
a. Open Public Hearing
b. Summation by Engineering Department
C. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents)
d. Staff Recommendation
e. Council Questions or Comments
f. Close Public Hearing
g. Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 00 -
9:40 PM
12. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
9:45 PM
13. NON AGENDA ITEMS
9:50 PM
14. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under
the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), (f) & (h) to discuss labor relations, real
property transactions, exempt public records, and current and pending litigation
issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore
nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those present. Representatives of the
news media are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information
discussed during this session.
10:00 PM
15. ADJOURNMENT
I:\ADM\CATHY\CCA\000627. DOC
COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 27, 2000 - PAGE 5
Agenda Item No.~
Meeting of D D
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 27, 2000
• STUDY SESSION
> Meeting was called to order at 6:33 p.m. by Council President Brian Moore
> Council Present: Councilors Paul Hunt, Council President Brian Moore, Joyce Patton, and Ken
Scheckla.
> Staff Present: City Manager Bill Monahan; Finance Director Craig Prosser; Hunian
Resources Director Sandy Zodrow; Senior Analyst Sherrie Burbank; Police
Chief Ron Goodpaster; City Engineer Gus Duenas; Deputy City Recorder
Greer Gaston; City Attorney Chuck Corrigan; Associate Planner Julia
Hajduk; Project Engineer Greg Berry
> Management/Confidential/Supervisory Classification/Compensation Study - Benefits
Recommendation
Sandy Zodrow, Human Resources Director, introduced Sherrie Burbank, Senior Analyst. She
referenced her memo discussing the benefits portion of the recommendations coming out of the
management compensation study. She reviewed the overtime issue for police lieutenants; the nature
of their work prevented them from taking the compensatory time that other M-2 category
management employees could take or to flex their schedubPs to accommodate overtime. She
recommended providing a cash option as another alternative for police lieutenants to receive
compensation for overtime worked.
Councilor Scheckla asked for clarification on the determination of overtime and how many
employees. Ms. Zodrow explained that overtime in the City was closely monitored by supervisors.
She advised that there are four lieutenants who are affected.
Councilor Scheckla expressed his concern that overtime be divided equitably among the officers in
question. Police Chief Ron Goodpaster explained the scheduling in the police department, which
assured fairness in overtime distribution. He mentioned that the cash option paid out at the regular
rate, not an overtime rate, and would be available only if the lieutenants could not use the other two
options.
Chief Goodpaster confirmed that staff included the money for the proposed cash option in the
budget. He explained that they based their budget estimate on the department's records of overtime
worked in the last two years. He emphasized that without this cash option, the lieutenants worked
overtime without compensation. He indicated that the department did not use shift differential pay.
Ms. Zodrow explained that the issue of deferred compensation, a program to which the City made
no contribution, was used by 41 out of 74 management employees. She presented the Task Force's
recommendation that the Council consider a City contribution to deferred compensation. She
referenced Attachment A, listing the cost of the program at various percentages.
Ms. Zodrow mentioned the funding Council allocated last year for staff to look at the issue of the
City participating in PERS. She referenced the information learned from the PERS actuarial study.
She emphasized that they wanted to present the financial aspect to Council before assessing if staff
had any interest in participating in PERS.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 1
mmmmj
> The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 6:42 p.m. under the provisions of ORS
192.660 (1) (d), (3), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and
pending litigation issues.
> Council President Moore reconvened the study session at 6:57 p.m.
Council President Moore discussed his concern with the overtime pay for the police lieutenants,
noting that overtime came with choosing that career path. He agreed that their inability to take
compensatory time was a consideration, as they should get some compensation for working
overtime. Chief Goodpaster confirmed that the lieutenants did not have the flexibility in scheduling
to take the options of compensatory time or flex time, as other management employees did.
Councilor Patton suggested an alternative to a straight cash option; if the lieutenants earned
compensatory time, but were unable to use it within a certain time period, the time would be
converted to cash. Chief Goodpaster indicated that Councilor Patton's suggestion was an
acceptable solution.
The Council agreed by consensus to direct staff to bring back information on the deferred
compensation issue.
e The Council discussed how to handle the CIP budget. Councilor Hunt commented that while he
favored the transportation bond issue, he did not support both the Atfalati bond and the
transportation bond; it was too much tax.
Mr. Monahan briefed the Council on the Menlor Reservoir neighbors' latest request; they
wanted the Council to initiate a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the multi-family
illliIIIIIIN zoning to single-family. He explained that the City was one of the four property owners
comprising the Intergovernmental Water Board. He said that Mr. Hendryx directed the person
who called today to go to the IWB and ask if it wanted to initiate a Comprehensive Plan change
to possibly devalue its property. He commented that the interworkings of the various
governmental entities were complex.
> The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 7:07 p.m. under the provisions of ORS
192.660 (1) (d), (3), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and
pending litigation issues.
> Council President Moore adjourned the Executive Session at 7:24 p.m.
1. BUSINESS MEETING
1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board
Council President Moore called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
1.2 Roll Call
Council President Moore, Councilors Hunt, Patton and Scheckla were present. Mayor
Nicoli attended via telephone for items 4, 5, and 6
> The Council considered Agenda Item No. 4, Public Comment Approve Capital Improvement
Program For Fiscal Year 2000-2001
1.4 Council Communications: None
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items: None
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 2
b•
1-00muni
a.
2. VISIT'OR'S AGENDA
e Jaime Ramsey, 15367 Fir Tree Drive
Mr. Ramsey mentioned that he has discussed this issue with Mr. Hendryx. He referenced the
support he heard on the Council at the last meeting to maintain the City-owned Clute property in
public ownership, thus insuring adequate public facilities at the north trailhead to the Cache Creek
properties. He held that because of its topography and amount of sensitive lands, the City could
only hope to sell it to developers for a fraction of its $4 million value.
Mr. Ramsey asked the City to maintain the property iii public ownership for greenspace or, if it
chose otherwise, to initiate an amendment to change the zoning to R-4.5 and to impose deed
restrictions to create conservation easements on the sensitive lands. He held that these two
processes would maintain the integrity of their neighborhood by limiting development to single
family detached housing. He said that the City owned the property, as the deed listed the City of
Tigard as the property owner, and had to initiate any land use changes on the property.
Councilor Hunt commented that he did not recall that the Council decided at the last meeting that it
wanted to keep this property in public ownership. Mr. Ramsey agreed that the Council took no
action but he reiterated that the question was asked why not keep it as open space. He stated his
belief that there had been support on the Council to change the zoning to maintain the integrity of
the neighborhood.
Mr. Hendryx reviewed the process to change the zoning of a property in the County. He explained
that the urban planning area agreement, between the City and Washington County, did not include
the authority to initiate a legislative amendment. A change to the land use regulations in
unincorporated Washington County can only be accomplished through the County.
Mr. Hendryx explained that, according to Mr. Wegner, although the City was listed as the property
owner on the deed, the City acted as the purchasing agent for the IWB in acquiring and developing
the property. He said that the IWB had to initiate a zoning change request with the County.
Councilor Hunt explained that the IGA between Durham, King City, Tigard and Washington
County creating the IWB required the agreement of all four parties to make any capital changes.
Mr. Monahan clarified that as the agent, Tigard simply carried out the direction of the IWB. He
emphasized that representatives from each of the jurisdictions made decisions in tandem on the
Water District property. He indicated that if the IWB decided to pursue a Comprehensive Plan
change, the City was the likely agent to process it.
Mr. Ramsey observed that the City had significant influence over the IWB. He asked if the Council
supported maintaining the property as public open space. Council President Moore said that the
City could make a recommendation to the Board through its representative Councilor Hunt but each
of the four voting representatives would have to go back to his/her agency to ask for direction on
how to proceed.
Mr. Ramsey observed that there was great confusion surrounding the question of who owned the
property; tonight was the first time he has heard that the City acted as an agent on behalf of the
Water District. He commented that from the outside looking in, it looked like the City owned it, as
the deed did not designate the City as an agent for someone else. Chuck Corrigan, City Attorney,
said that his office could look into it. He commented that the City could be an agent, even if it was
listed on the title, if this was the agreement.
Council President Moore directed staff to investigate if a document existed authorizing the City to
act as the District's agent, and to provide a copy to the neighbors.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 3
Mr. Monahan suggested that Mr. Wegner raise this issue to the Board for discussion at the Board's
July 12 meeting. He said that the neighbors would be welcome to participate. He emphasized that
the Board would not make a decision on the matter at that meeting.
Mr. Ramsey asked if the Council would support maintaining the property as open space. Councilor
Hunt said that the Council needed to discuss the question.
Mr. Monahan spoke to Mr. Hendryx and Mr. Wegner will meet to discuss these issues and develop
information to share with the Council, the Board and the neighbors prior to the meeting, in order to
facilitate a good discussion. He stated that since there was no urgency to dispose of the property,
they had time to work through this issue.
Councilor Hunt commented that it was important for the Board to understand the other alternative
suggested by the neighbors. He speculated, based on discussions at the Board, that the Board
wanted to sell the land in order to get money to put towards another reservoir.
Council President Moore stated that the Council was as concerned as the neighbors and was not
trying to hide anything. The City wanted to do things properly within the context of their agreement
with the IWB.
® Trish Farmer, 15350 SW Firtree Dr
Ms. Farmer pointed out on the map that there was no open space within the general vicinity of this
neighborhood of families with small children. She stated that using the property as open space
would give neighborhood children a place to play, would give access to the Cache Creek property,
and would insure adequate parking. She commented that the City cooperation with the
neighborhood may cause the Bull Mountain area community to view annexation more favorably.
• Margaret Rollo, 15374 SW Firtree Dr
Ms. Rollo concurred with the first two speakers. She asked the Council to consider rezoning the
area to a lower density, citing the new Scholls Heights School's need to use portable classrooms
next year to accommodate the number of students.
6 Chris Farmer, 15350 SW Firtree Drive
Mr. Farnier asked for clarification on how the IWB operated, especially in terms of representation
and taxation. Councilor Hunt explained that the City ran the distribution and maintenance system
for the IWB but the IWB controlled the Water District, approving the budget and capital
expenditures. He reviewed the history of the Tigard Water District, explaining that once the District
included the Cities of Tigard, Durham and King City as well as a portion of unincorporated
Washington County. Eventually all three cities pulled out of the Water District, leaving only
unincorporated Washington County with the name `Tigard Water District.'
Mr. Monahan explained that the IWB included one voting representative each from the four
agencies - Tigard, Durham, King City and the Tigard Water District - and one non-voting member-
a at-large. He indicated that the Tigard Water District member represented the Bull Mountain area.
Council President Moore emphasized that the City of Tigard and the Tigard Water District were two
different entities, with no tax dollars going to the common water system; the water system was
revenue driven. Councilor Hunt clarified that legally they had to keep the revenues and
expenditures generated from water in a separate account from the tax revenues and expenditures.
Councilor Scheckla reiterated that no tax money from the Bull Mountain residents went to the City
of Tigard.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 4
Mr. Ramsey asked for clarification on the money Washington County paid to the City for the
services the City provided in the urban services area. Mr. Flendryx explained that that building,
current planning and development-related engineering programs were fee-supported, while the
County transferred the road maintenance money allocated to the area to the City, which was under
contract to provide that service. Mr. Monahan confirmed that all the services that the Bull
Mountain area received from the City were revenue neutral to the City.
• Valerie Ramaswamy, 13299 SW Ascension Drive
Ms. Ramaswamy stated that she did not live in the Bull Mountain area, nor would she be impacted
by any development occurring in the area. She recounted her neighborhood's experience in
working with all levels of the City for the last 15 months with respect to maintaining a greenspace
in their neighborhood. She mentioned the City and the County's encouragement to her neighbors to
participate in the existing citizen involvement forums but questioned what use they were, since the
developers did not have to comply with the Tigard Vision Plan or community plans. She quoted
from written remarks of Julia Hajduk and Dick Bewersdorff discussing the staff's inability to
enforce the Bull Mountain Community Plan and Tigard Beyond Tomorrow Vision because the
goals and strategies were not legally codified in the Tigard Code, which was the standard for
development proposals. She characterized the citizen teams with no clout to affect development as
"the run around."
Councilor Scheckla asked how the Council could address Ms. Ramaswamy's remarks. Mr.
Corrigan said that they needed to get the criteria into the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Monahan explained that the Visioning Plan was a new activity in the City, compared to the
Comprehensive Plan and Development Code drafted in 1983. He indicated that the City was in the
process of taking the concepts and deciding how it wanted to change the legal development
standards to affect development over the next 20 years. He emphasized that the State of Oregon
required the City to follow the Comprehensive Plan and Codes. He said that the City could not
throw out its Comprehensive Plan and follow the Vision; it had to amend the Plan to incorporate
standards implementing the Vision.
Councilor Scheckla concurred with Ms. Ramaswamy that it made no sense for the City to encourage
input at the CIT meetings and then say that it could do nothing about the situation. Mr. Monahan
pointed out that many changes to the Plan began with citizen input at the CIT meetings in response
to a particular development application. He explained that, even with those citizen concerns, state
law required the City to evaluate an application against the standards in place at the time of the
application. He observed that this was an inherent conflict in land use planning law throughout the
state.
Mr. Hendryx indicated to Councilor Hunt that the code revision two years ago did not include the
visioning document, as it was not done at that time. He explained to Ms. Ramaswamy, with respect
to the Bull Mountain Community plan, that the City looked to the County for direction on its
application of the land use regulations in the urban services area. He reiterated that the City had no
authority to impose the County's Comprehensive Plan.
Ms. Ramaswamy reiterated her contention that joining citizen involvement committees did not work
to affect change; it simply sidetracked the citizens. Council President Moore stated that the Council
was not trying to sidetrack citizens; rather it was trying to get information to the citizens so that the
citizens could go through the legal process to affect change. He emphasized that the Council has
always supported any neighborhood that came before it, but it would not grant requests that
circumvented the law.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 5
__mom,
Ms. Ramaswamy asked if the Council could provide more channels to the citizens, contending that,
from their experience, the existing channels did not work. Council President Moore reiterated the
Council's support of livability. He directed Ms. Ramaswamy to bring any recommendations she
had for Code changes to improve the community to staff and to go through the process. Mr.
Monahan discussed the code change process developed by the community. He recommended
sending any requests to Jim Hendryx, who would assign staff to evaluate it and bring it forward to
the Council to see if the Council wanted to initiate the amendment process.
Jar! Stiinson, 152$6 SW Firtree Drive
2M 1
Ms. Stimson inquired about the time of the July 12 meeting at the Water District building.
Councilor Hunt said that meetings started at 5:30 p.m.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to approve the Consent Agenda.
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Councilors Hunt, Moore,
Patton and Scheckla voted "yes.") [4-0]
3.1 Approve a Resolution Adopting the Management/Coniidential/Supervisory Group
Pay Plan Effective July 1, 2000 - Resolution No. 00-34
3.2 Approve a Resolution Authorizing Refinancing and Additional Interim Financing for
the 691n Avenue Local Improvement District - Resolution No. 00-35
> The Council considered Agenda Item 7 at this time.
4. PUBLIC COMMENT APPROVE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001
Gus Duenas, City Engineer, reviewed the changes to the capital improvement program since his
June 13 PowerPoint presentation to the Council. He mentioned adding funds to close the 69
Avenue LID and putting aside finds for the design of Greenburg Road from Washington Square
Drive to Tiedeman Avenue. He summarized the street, sewer, storm drainage, parks, trails and
water supply projects slated for FY 2000/2001 (see June 13 PowerPoint presentation for details).
He asked for Council approval of the program.
Mr. Monahan noted that the Council voted 2 to 2 on this item at the June 13 meeting. He mentioned
the land acquisition of the Cache Creek Park addition and the Bond Street Park as the issue in
question. Mr. Hendryx reported that staff, with the Trust for Public Lands, presented the City's two i
large grant requests for the acquisition of these properties to the state advisory board on June 14. Of
the $4 million available, he indicated that they would not know how their grant requests will fair
until early July.
Councilor Scheckla asked what happened to the $150,000 if the City did not get either grant.
Council President Moore explained that the Council told the Trust for Public Lands that it had to
a provide the $150,000 or the City would not accept the properties. He emphasized that the $150,000
was a donation; it did not involve general fund tax money.
s
a
a
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 6
Mr. Hendryx clarified to Councilor Scheckla that the Bond Street property lay inside the City limits
while the other property was in unincorporated Washington County next to Cache Creek. Mr.
Hendryx indicated that, while he did not recall the exact history of the Council proceedings, the
Council did decide not to proceed with acquiring the Bond Street property using the greenspaces
money. Council President Moore commented that the Council decided not to proceed mainly
because of a lack of commitment from the neighbors who wanted the City to come up with
additional funds. Councilor Hunt said this was not the main consideration.
Mr. Monahan confirmed that the CIP budget included the $150,000 under the category of donation.
Councilor Hunt commented that some of the confusion arose when the Trust for Public Lands
returned with an alternate proposal after the Council voted against providing any City funds to
purchase the properties.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
Council President Moore opened up the hearing to public testimony. Hearing none, he closed the
hearing.
COUNCIL QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS
Councilor Hunt recalled that he requested removing the properties from the budget. He reiterated
that he objected to their inclusion because the Council had voted it down before on the grounds that
it did not want the properties at any price. He discussed his second objection, that only part of the
Council knew that the Trust for Public Lands was going to make a second presentation, thus
eliminating the level playing field. He mentioned the vote at the first meeting as 4 to 1 against and
the vote at the second meeting as 3 to 2 in favor.
Councilor Patton pointed out that funding was listed as a `donation' with regard to the Bonita Park,
Cache Creek addition, and Bond Street Park. She asked staff if it was common practice for a
project, whose funding source did not work out, to drop off at that time. Mr. Duenas confirmed that
projects without funding were removed from the list.
Motion by Council President Moore, seconded by Councilor Patton, to approve the capital
improvement program for FY 2000-2001.
Motion passed by majority voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Council President
Moore and Councilor Patton voted "yes." Councilors Hunt and Scheckla voted "no.") [3-2]
5. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDER RATIFYING RESOLUTION NO. 00-31, A
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET, MAIMING APPROPRIATIONS,
DECLARING THE VALOREM TAX LEVY AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS
PROVIDED BY ORS 310.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001
a. Council President Moore opened the public hearing.
b. Summation by Finance Department
Craig Prosser, Finance Director, explained that staff thought it best for the Council to ratify the
budget adopted on June 13, following the resolution of the capital improvement program question,
since the CIP budget was included in the overall budget.
c. Public Testimony
Council President Moore opened the hearing to public testimony. Hearing none, he closed the
hearing to public testimony.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 7
Win
d. Staff Recommendation
Mr. Prosser recommended ratification of the budget.
e. Council Questions or Comments
Councilor Hunt commented that a `yes' vote for the budget effectively approved the capital
expenditures budget. He observed that if he voted against the CIP, then he should vote against this
budget. Mr. Corrigan indicated that the Councilor could vote `yes' if he believed that the City
budget, in total, outweighcd the negatives of the last motion.
f. Council President Moore closed the public hearing
g. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 00-32
Motion by Councilor Patton, seconded by Mayor Nicoli, to ratify Resolution 00-32.
The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-32, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD ADOPTING THE
BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS, DECLARING THE VALOREM TAX LEVY AND
CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS PROVIDED BY ORS 310.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-
2001.
Motion passed by majority voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Council Pr: :dent
Moore and Councilor Patton voted "yes." Councilors Hunt and SchecIda voteu "no.") [3-2]
6. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 7,
2000, TO SUBMIT TO THE VOTERS THE QUESTION OF CONTRACTING A
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDED INDEBTEDNESS IN THE AMOUNT OF $16
MILLION TO FINANCE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Mr. Duenas reviewed the history of this project and the Council's direction at the May 9, 2000,
meeting for staff to return with a resolution and ballot title to place the Transportation Bond
package on the November 7, 2000, ballot. He summarized the projects included in the package (See
May 9, 2000, PowerPoint presentation for details).
Motion by Councilor Patton, seconded by Mayor Nicoli, to adopt Resolution 00-33 calling for
an election on the Transportation Bond measure.
The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution.
RESOLUTION 00-33, A RESOLUTION OF TIGARD CITY COUNCIL CALLING FOR AN
ELECTION ON THE NOVEMBER 7, 2000, TO SUBMIT TO THE VOTERS THE QUESTION
OF CONTRACTING A GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDED INDEBTEDNESS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $16 MILLION DOLLARS TO FINANCE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.
Motion passed by majority voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Council President
Moore and Councilor Patton voted "yes." Councilors Hunt and Scheckla voted "no.") [3-2]
Mayor Nicoli , attending via telephone, left the meeting.
> The Council considered Item 1.4, Council Communications, at this time.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 8
Mill
7. CONSIDER AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH WASHINGTON
COUNTY, PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS
FOR THE CITY AS PART OF A PROJECT OF THE COUNTY'S MAJOR STREETS
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT.
Mr. Duenas explained that staff wanted to coordinate with the County to incorporate a sewer
reimbursement district within the Walnut and 121" Avenue MSTIP3 project limits, to extend the
project's storm drainage line across Walnut, to install water lines, and to underground the utilities.
He asked the Council to approve the resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign the
intergovernmental agreement and to forward it to the County Board for its approval.
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Resolution 00-36.
The Deputy City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution.
RESOLUTION 00-36, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF TIGARD,
OREGON, APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
AND WASHINGTON COUNTY PROVIDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CITY AS PART OF A PROJECT OF THE COUNTY'S MAJOR
STREETS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT.
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Councilors Hunt, Moore,
Patton and Scheckla voted "yes.") [4-0]
8. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO
ALLOW DAYCARE USES IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES (ZOA) 1999-0003
The applicant is proposing a Zone Ordinance Amendment to change the City of Tigard
Community Development Code to allow daycare uses outright or conditionally in all
industrial-zoned properties. LOCATION: All Industrial Zones, Citywide. ZONES:
Light Industrial, I-L; Industrial Park, I-P; and Heavy Industrial, I-H. APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390;
Comprehensive Plan Policies 5 and 12.3; The Metro 2040 Plan; and Statewide Planning
Goals 2 and 9.
a. Council President reconvened the public hearing.
b. Declarations or Challenges
There were none.
c. Summation by Community Development Department
Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner, recalled the staff presentation of two options at the Council June
20 work session, and the Council's direction to staff to prepare an amendment to the Code to allow
daycare uses with restrictions in all industrial zones (page 2, 4). She recommended approval of the
zone ordinance amendment.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 9
11 111lizallill 111111'!
'L
d. Public Testimony
o Mark Padgett, 11270 SW 95th
Mr. Padgett asked the Council not to approve the zone ordinance amendment. He discussed the
Planning Commission's support of allowing businesses already operating in an industrial zone to
provide daycare to their workers within their industrial site. He explained that the Commission
denied the request to allow stand-alone daycares in the industrial zone because of the limited
amount of industrial zoned land in the City, and the likelihood that such daycares could be used by
people working anywhere in the City. He characterized it as simply allowing another commercial
use in an industrial zone.
Mr. Padgett indicated that the Commission heard no testimony from any business owners in the
industrial zones that they needed this use to remain competitive. He reiterated that the Commission
felt allowing the option of existing business owners to set aside a portion of their property for
employee daycare satisfied the economic development argument.
Councilor Hunt pointed out that not all businesses in the industrial zones were large enough to
provide daycare for their small number of employees. Mr. Padgett suggested that those businesses
provide a co-op daycare within their own properties. He reiterated the Commission's concern at the
limited amount of industrial land left in the City. He held that there was no history supporting the
contention that convenient daycare in the industrial zone provided a benefit to the workers or that
the majority of people using the daycare would work in the industrial zone. He emphasized that the
Commission saw no compelling need for this use. He said that the Commission did not feel that the
legislative process was the appropriate place to solve economic development issues.
o John Brosy
Mr. Brosy stated that, since the Commission hearing, they have obtained letters from business
owners of industrial properties expressing support of the zone ordinance change and the need for
daycares closer to employment generators in the City. He said that the track history showed that the
City's existing code provision for daycares in IP zones has not been helpful, as only one daycare
existed. He reiterated that freestanding daycares typically occupied 35,000 square foot lots. He
projected two to three daycares moving into the Tigard industrial areas in the next 10 years. He
restated their support of staff's first option, daycares as outright permitted uses in industrial zones
with restrictions, provided that staff was reasonable in its handling of the scope of the required
environmental impact statement.
e. Staff Recommendation
Ms. Hajduk recommended approval of the ordinance with the draft changes.
f. Council Questions or Comments
g. Council President Moore closed the public hearing
h. Consideration by the Council: Ordinance No. 00-23
Motion by Councilor Patton, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Ordinance 00-23.
The Deputy City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance.
ORDINANCE 00-23, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LANGUAGE OF THE TIGARD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW DAYCARE USES IN INDUSTRIAL
ZONES.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 10
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Councilors Hunt, Council
President Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted "yes.") [4-0]
Council President Moore recessed the meeting for a break. He reconvened the meeting.
9. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING BUILDING, PLUMBING,
MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PERMIT AND RELATED FEES
Gary Lampella, Building Official, gave a PowerPoint presentation on the resolution to increase
building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical permit fees (see Council packet materials for details).
He noted that this 51 % increase was the second part of the original 102% increase. He cited the
reorganization of the department as the reason for the reduction in the proposed 30% fee increase
for the multi-family dwellings and commercial to 25%. He reviewed the current reserve amounts
and projected deficits for the various programs for FY 1999/2000. He indicated that the Council did
approve fund transfers to cover the deficits in the electrical and the building funds, and that staff
continued negotiations with Washington County for funds to cover the urban services area.
Mr. Lampella reviewed the increased fee amounts that would allow the City to cover the actual
costs of the programs and to begin to develop a six month reserve over a five year period: 45%
plumbing, 45% mechanical, 25% electrical, 25% multi-family building, and 25% commercial. He
reviewed the reserve amounts resulting from the fee increases. He commented that historically
mechanical programs were not self-supporting in Oregon, and staff would do more research to see
how they could improve the fiend. He discussed the SB 512 fee methodology, which defined how
jurisdictions in the tri-county area determined permit fees.
Mr. Lampella observed that the cost of doing business depleted the dedicated reserve fund
established by the City in 1997 (starting balance of $305,000). He spoke to building the reserves
back up over five years to allow the City to make it through the lean years. He reviewed a chart
illustrating the projected revenues in each fund versus the projected program costs. He cor
that the revenues optimistically assumed collection of every penny of projected revenue. He
reviewed the impacts of the department reorganization on the various divisions, including staff
reductions, consolidations, transfers, and task reassignments.
Mr. Lampella pointed out that the FY 2000/01 budget of $1.29 million was a reduction of $210,000
from the $1.5 million FY 1999/2000 budget. He emphasized that, with the reorganization, staff
believed that more modest fee increases were possible.
Mr. Hendryx commented that Mr. Lampella did a very conservative estimate. He said that Mr.
Lampella was correct in stating that his projections assumed revenue that collected every cent;
however, his projections were based on a flat or slightly increased building activity, and did not
include a huge increase in building activity. He indicated that staff would monitor the situation
monthly. Mr. Lampella said that he based his projections on past trends, which indicated a level
amount of building activity, not a dramatic increase or decrease.
Councilor Hunt asked how much would these fee increases impact the cost of a $200,000 house.
Mr. Lampella estimated a $400 to $500 increase per house. Council President Moore observed that
if the City did not collect these permit fees, then it had to use general fund property tax dollars to
support the programs.
Mr. Lampella explained that their projected revenues were guesses on how much the City would
collect each year.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 11
- - i WJ
7
Councilor Scheckla asked what Kevin Wing, the representative for the Homebuilders Association,
thought of these fee increases. Mr. Lampella stated that staff has kept the Homebuilders and Mr.
Wing informed of the City's actions with respect to the fee increases. He commented that the
contractors with whom he has spoken understood the need for the fee increases, although they did
not necessarily like them.
Mr. Lampella stated that the City needed these large fee increases now because it did not do
incremental fee increases over the years.
Council President Moore opened the meeting to public testimony.
o Kevin Wing, Homebuilders Association
Mr. Wing stated that the Homebuilders used the reasonable and necessary test prescribed in the
Oregon statutes in evaluating fee increases. He mentioned the Homebuilders' appeal to the State
Building Codes Division of Tigard's 51 % fee increase; the hearings officer approved the fee
increase but not the methodology. He quoted from the hearings officer's report with respect to
cities not including indirect administrative costs in the methodology, only direct program costs. He
mentioned the hearings officer's comment that some of the materials and services were improperly
allocated. He emphasized the finding that cities should recover indirect administrative costs from
somewhere other than permit fees.
Mr. Wing said that if the City removed these indirect administrative costs from the budget, then the
deficit would likely disappear. He expressed his appreciation for Mr. Lampella's work. He
commented that he thought it likely that a City policy ordered them to collect costs that should not
be allocated to permit purchasers. Mr. Wing confirmed to Councilor Hunt that he thought that was
the case in this current request.
Council President Moore disagreed with Mr. Wing's comments. He argued that these were
appropriate increases, regardless of whether or not they were appealed.
Mr. Hendryx stated that staff used the latest methodology set out in SB 587 for how jurisdictions
justified expenses for building programs. He noted that the methodology allocated the application
of certain indirect expenses to the programs, within certain guidelines. He mentioned that this was
different from the Hearings Officer's report from a year ago.
Councilor Scheckla asked if Tigard's fees were out of line with other cities in the area. Mr. Wing
said that he did not know, as his concern focused on the fairness and equity of the methodology
rather than the final outcome.
o Jim Chapman, Legend Homes
Mr. Chapman discussed the importance of a strong building department in preventing chaos, citing
what happened in a neighboring jurisdiction. He indicated that he found the increases reasonable.
He spoke to a stronger building department reducing permit processing time and saving money for
both the builder and the homeowner. He commented that he wanted the Tigard Building Division
to be able to continue its excellent service. He said that he did not know how the methodology
compared to other cities. He mentioned his service on a Tri-County Services Board intended to help
building departments streamline and unify their procedures, which he said should benefit the Tigard
Building Department.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 12
Councilor Scheckla asked how Tigard compared to other jurisdictions with respect to procedures
and fees. Mr. Chapman said that, excluding the SDC fee issue, Tigard's fees overall were in the
middle. He characterized them as fair and equitable. He commented that he thought Tigard's
staffing level had been high in years past for a City of its size but it did have a lot of building
activity, which was now decreasing as the City's buildable land decreases. He indicated that the
department reorganization was working well. He mentioned a permit application turn around in a
few days at Tigard, as compared to 8 weeks at Washington County.
o Craig Prosser, Finance Director
Mr. Prosser discussed the issue of the allocation of the cost, indicating that staff tried to be very
careful about it and follow the SB 587 standards to the letter. He mentioned the main standard that
a jurisdiction had to use the same methodology to allocate costs across all the services provided,
whether that be building services or water or whatever. He referenced the training for Building
Officials that Mr. Lampella attended, which provided examples on how to apply the SB 587
methodology standards. He stated that staff was comfortable that the City was in compliance with
state law.
Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Resolution 00-37.
The Deputy City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-37, A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING BUILDING, PLUMBING,
MECHANv'ICAL AND ELECTRICAL PERMITS AND RELATED FEES.
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Councilors Hunt, Council
President Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted "yes.") [4-0]
10. PUBLIC HEARING - SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000
a. Council President Moore opened the public hearing.
b. Summation by Finance Department
Mr. Prosser explained that the costs for the 69" LID came in higher than the estimated $901,000 due
to additional work requested by property owners and higher than anticipated acquisition costs. He
asked for a budget adjustment to reflect the actual expenditures.
Mr. Prosser noted a correction on the exhibit: there was no interfund loan included in the sources
for the additional money. He explained that because of a court case on a property acquisition for the
LID not scheduled for hearing until October 4, staff opted for interim financing rather than roll over
an interfund loan as of October 1.
Mr. Prosser reviewed for Councilor Scheckla the process of an LID. Councilor Scheckla asked if
the deficit would impose a hardship on the homeowners within the LID. Mr. Duenas said that it
probably would. He noted that the Council decided to apply the approved assessment method to
everyone without exception. He said that the homeowners could address Council when the final
assessments came forward for approval. Staff reassured Councilor Scheckla that the work or a
private developer in remodeling his building did not impact the LID costs.
c. Public Testimony
Council President Moore opened the hearing to public testimony. Hearing none, he closed the
public testimony.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 13
:i
d. Staff Recommendation
Mr. Prosser recommended approval of the supplemental budget.
e. Council Questions or Comments
E Council President Moore closed the public hearing
g. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 00-38
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Patton, to adopt Resolution 00-38.
Motion was approved by majority voice vote of Council present. (Councilors Hunt, Council
President Moore, and Patton voted "yes." Councilor Scheckla voted "no.") [4-0]
11. INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING - SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT
DISTRICT NO. 18 SW WALNUT STREET AT THE INTERSECTION WITH SW
121 S' AVENUE
a. Council President Moore opened the public hearing.
b. Summation by Engineering Department
Greg Berry, Project Engineer, stated that this tenth reimbursement district project would add 24
sewer services, bringing the total number of sewer services provided through the program to 146.
He indicated that the projected cost of $207,350 split into $8,640 fee per owner, with the actual cost
determined after construction. He mentioned the additional $2,335 connection fee. He confirmed
to Councilor Patton that the homeowners in this district who connected within the first year paid
$8,000 per the resolution.
c. Public Testimony
Council President Moore opened the hearing to public testimony. Hearing none, he closed the
public testimony.
d. Staff Recommendation
Mr. Berry recommended approval of the resolution establishing the reimbursement district.
e. Council Questions or Comments
f. Council President Moore closed the public hearing
Mr. Berry confirmed to Councilor Patton that the homeowner chose when to connect to the new
sewer; there was no requirement by the City to do so. He indicated to Councilor Sciieckla that
seven people had been in favor of the district, although staff had a lot of no responses. He explained
that a City-initiated reimbursement district did not require a majority.
g. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 00-39
Motion by Councilor Patton, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Resolution No. 00-39.
The Deputy City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-39, A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER
REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 18.
s
1
1
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 14
Councilor Hunt asked if staff received any applications for reimbursement districts in the Walnut
Island area. Mr. Berry said that they have not. He commented that staff was being more aggressive
in surveying people in attempts to start projects but the problem was that those who wanted sewers
tended to be scattered; they needed to find a concentrated number of people who want sewers in
order to create a project. He indicated that anyone interested in consideration for a project should
call him.
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Councilors Hunt, Council
President Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted "yes.") [4-0]
12. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS - NONE
13. NON-AGENDA ITEMS - NONE
14. STUDY SESSION
Council President Moore adjourned the meeting to Study Session at 9:55 p.m.
Mr. Monahan reviewed the Volunteer Recognition event.
Mr. Monahan reported that the Korean War Commemorative Committee has approved the City
for participation. He stated that Councilor Scheckla has been working with Patsy Nestor of the
Legion. He mentioned the ceremonial event scheduled for the July 11 Council meeting. He
indicated that staff advertised in the Cityscape for any Korean War vets to identify themselves,
if they were not already on the Legion's roster.
Atfalati bond measure resolution was reviewed. Mr. Monahan reported that the staff informed
Washington County that the Tigard Council wanted further input with respect to the Atfalati
bond measure. He noted that the issue was whether or not to do a separate new resolution. He
indicated that Gary Firestone of the City Attorney's Office concurred with County Counsel Dan
Olsen's opinion that legally the City was fine with its existing resolution but he did not think
that a separate resolution clarifying the Council's position would hurt anything. He said that he
sent a letter to the County as a placeholder in their public hearing process, so that the City could
testify at the second hearing on August 15, if the Council so desired.
Council President Moore reiterated his support of proceeding with the existing resolution, and
allowing the taxpayers to make the final decision. Councilor Patton indicated that the City
Attorney's evaluation alleviated her concerns. Councilors Hunt and Scheckla each reiterated his
opposition to the Atfalati resolution.
Council President Moore suggested that the Council as a whole submit a letter voicing its
concern that the pennanent/non-permanent rate issue was not what it had voted on but indicating
its understanding that its existing resolution was legal. Councilor Hunt argued that this was a
moving target and they did not know what they were voting on in many respects. He suggested
a separate resolution so that it would be clear what they were voting on. Councilor Scheckla
said that he preferred a new resolution so he could go on record as opposing the permanent tax
rate.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 15
Councilor Patton indicated that she could support keeping the existing resolution or doing
another resolution. She reiterated that she still supported the Atfalati resolution. She
commented that her biggest concern was how clearly Washington County would draft the ballot
statement informing the voters of what they were voting on. Council President Moore
suggested including Councilor Patton's concern in the Council letter to the County.
Councilor Hunt asked how he and Councilor Scheckla could indicate their opposition to the
County. Mr. Corrigan said that Councilors, as elected officials, were free to voice their opinions;
the only consideration was the political fall-out. Mr. Monahan suggested having an open public
discussion in which the opinions of each of the Councilors were clearly reflected in the meeting
minutes. Councilor Hunt mentioned his concern that the public know what happened. Mr.
Monahan suggested inviting Atfalati to a regular Council meeting to discuss their position.
Council President Moore commented that Atfalati made an infonned decision at its meeting to
combine the two rates.
Councilor Scheckla reiterated that he wanted a separate resolution so that he could go on record
as opposing the permanent rate. Mr. Corrigan indicated that the existing resolution was not
interpreted as the Council voting on any rate. Mr. Monahan said that staff would bring forward
a resolution supporting the permanent rate combining the two rates, which would allow a clear
vote by the Council.
Councilor Hunt asked the Council to consider naming the new athletic field at Cook Park `The
Nicoli Brothers Recreation Field' in recognition of the efforts of Jim and Dave Nicoli on behalf
of recreation in the community. The Council unanimously ;.suported consideration of Councilor
Hunt's suggestion. Mr. Monahan said that staff could bring the matter forward at the July 11
meeting. The Council discussed whether to name it `Jim and Dave Nicoli' or `The Nicoli
Brothers.'
14. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 10:05 p.m. under the provisions of ORS
192.660 (1) (d), (3), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending
litigation issues.
15. ADJOURNMENT: 10:35 p.m.
-ell
Attest: Greer A. Gaston, Deputy City Recorder
Council Presi Brian J. Moore
Date: _--1fU_ 1151 co/)
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MD UTES - JUNE 27, 2000 PAGE 16
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice TT 9674
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
C.O T'
Legal Notice Advertising secs IVP[)
SUN 2 g 2000
'City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice
13125 S11 Hall Blvd.
• inistration
Tigard,Oregon 97223 ❑ Duplicate Affidavit 1~(~Y~►
Accounts Payable
• e
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON, )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss.
I, Kathy Snyder
being first duly sworn, depose and say, that I am the Advertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard-Tua1 atin T_. mes
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at Tigard in the
aforesaid county and state; that the
Meeting Highlights 6/27/00
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for. ONE successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
June 22,2000
Subscribed and sworn to be me this22nd day of .Tune, 2000
AZ'
Fn, ?
Notary Publi or regon ► ' \~~~r'~}~TF,
/
My Commission Expires:
AFFIDAVIT
The following meeting highlights are published for your information. Full
agendas may be obtained from the City Recorder, 13125 S.W. Hall.
Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639-4171. 1
a
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
AND LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING
June 27, 2000 - 6:30 P.M.
TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON
* Public hearings:
- 2000-01 Fiscal Year Budget
- Zone Ordinance Amendment to Allow Daycare Uses in Industrial
Zones (ZOA) 1999-0003
- Supplemental Budget for Fiscal Year 1999-2000
• Public Comment: Capital Improvement Program for FY 2000-2001
• Consider Resolution Calling for an Election on November 7, 2000, to
Ask Voters to Consider a General Obligation Bonded Indebtedness in
the Amount of $16 Million to Finance Transportation System Im-
provement Projects.
* Informational Public Hearing Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement District
No. 18 - SW Walnut Street at the intersection with SW 121st Avenue
• Consider Resolution Establishing Building, Plumbing, Mechanical
and Electrical Permit and Related Fees.
TT9674 - Publish June 22, 2000.
Affidavit of Publication
e
q ® n
yj
f
COMME4 L'c
13
P.O. Bt 111 FAX (503) 222-53513
STATE OF OREGON, COLIN ~
I, I.J. CAPLAN, being first dul 41LY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE, a newspaper of
general circulation in the cou as defined by ORS 193.010 and 193.020;
f 3) Zl4►dc3
published at Portland in the o wows- RAfenb 91
Inad veld e4i 'S01 -
I. ul Pe49tige)se se 41 A transportation bond will 1111
NOTICE OF BUDGET I e 20tt0 1 Budget
CITY OF TIGARD As in rIor years, the budget for,
unity. n addition, resources we i
1311 i throughout the community:'
The approved operating budget .
a printed copy of which is her -f Off. This low grOtvti~ rate is Pies
was published in the entire iss radauxlort in
ONE The roved PortiarrONE time(s) 11 add p nbl In Poll t c,
in the following issues:
For the rst fl ti budget j comput9r JUNE 20, 2000 Om three 9 but
us" i blic woft eybterns. and Tidem
,apjnw uowuoo In FY 2001/02. The,
(00 BOr.ti major>afrotOmcosts. 911 ~4pea S to wed Fa1lo+xing Is a descrlpkm of the
s)uewAsd 0 : L'L14bf$ '43ee LL'L9lS 3 dressing significant Issues:,
Case No. ; to sluew~tad ol. :slueAad :owns a FE," nanca
`I BuI-IIoo►} Ota 'enp us4m Aed of anll% of `O Funding for additional 1.75 FTEi
s.ioUmio sl epeul of einsopwq e4f tpl4m fo}, related to the introduction d
io} tee}ep sup 409a,99 sollms pesµad g rpo . filing service. turn-oft e and tuI
U00 o) 3uenarnd papwoei uaeq Trey fq ' ust. ed City aaets, such as citWnide
l na}ep to -nou s Pus Peep 41 PRO su Budget Growth In thel
~q Pwrges suo"Igo an Appes of Aye jap
Eng Depar6tie pca
I f-Z M:Jd
117- l 91 review nd activity has s owea'
Subscribed and sworn to b me this Ruedad &ipedppled uxu} alueuissesse Rq p continuos to increase as dry
041 :MW ul erl)BW spuog esey,t refuo0 om; ' •..-d's major Issue. Thus, traffic !
rasa, and-destgn of irnprovernent;
~tuw. needs. Professional services, s,{
20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2000 panadde eqt mAoidde xy 0003 'gt ounr uo lrogr
-leew ol{gnd seues a 4Bnoi4f Rem eip QulPBe11 am 5rrtalI increases in atat r in tty
` eAadwi fBJldeO e41 'usld iep~utd 84l ul spa' ))are Included. Due to the Iim
begiri cl building a rpsernra for h;
site -selection, and to rase;
be deve
r yes Aaumuy R)!O }o eouefeq e41 -000,M$ to a e i will alopednowi t:
r funding for
'uadxe
o~i sly !GfINn~ BW` raatM in vrasts.
h ;'..RC CA.PLAIJ M AE" fueweBeuew R>radad syl
' r ° •LIC.OREGON WAE}Ilf stp of powepUR4 Ueeg ens4wewursi oO Overall euDoveloprd
304247 tras~tieid poaltlona-vacant-sqt
n r r - I -lob si elnpoWs ummocaKdou Ls4sjlq f e 4Sl •eN,3e- ess4hnet~`Indkxte that rb
IAY C ._.,t is v-;Xr I`, v .Yl T. F, ^^Ot I •409 Pus jefndum }a uop9zp4uo0 -paddns rttuston Is tho fast #vd t!;
tsrwMppe N 101 B. That ir,cresse, hoar
-anew olignd B BnwBe Item ss eBupsew III Council- will be considering el
014 rban`servlose we. delivered '
! - wort iota e 4 It il0 • wwl eta u! )ueurd of futuro park 1b}0,
I Uoo 'Bf O a u l o114nd soft of roRgw+31W a Communl y Dove
I 'teeA . unit Of V" etil etp Bululp Iswpwojq f 911 Pwt Mte caning yew an anraxatksrli
'~Ael> u edsoaitrj N411o4 w 04f 991 1 population in the unlncorporal;
I - ~
=11,16 4VAU ayl W04 senuom xef Auocinld Rq t~Bnq in Public Waft
Hied o) puodser of BudMe 91 81?4m soul} 40narp Finance and one now pNttlarl .
341 J83810 ewnosaa Pam is+mppe us -44 311J water actlvld®s continue to C0r~1
a dedinre in the WOW Funsf
00)'t IsuoptPPe sip epuec o) 3" 0') Pus 'uopsin
Japes 0104d All elepiul o) 9' :smoip} ss PetngPM The I urtiel Wow
receiving M7ater,'recoi
'Puna m" weJBOJd souguoueisw orpue-Awd a irnxe of 3 eff=tve July'
•eseexxif itim (rpt3d m seliw 'puel Ww bo same 'tool not yet bee;rl detsrmirtd.
This portion may be detached. ul 1101e4 uGOq se4 e0urAsse mo2un1oA • Property Managernertt,"
spuewwsp eou UG%ufew s>Ned •uOWJGW isow a Bul+( tt I addi corm a~reymade. Tile
DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE eousuelulaw Pug su~efaw LeI "u3mmnf~ to the.pct Sir
__r:cau,na:wM. ,n-an-m,n ururhn_aumeuwm a,~.wa P~ST~'
P.O. Box 10127, Portland, Ore. 97296-0127
HEATHER BURRIS, CITY OF TIGARD
13125 SW HALL BLVD.
TIGARD, OR 97223 Ad.No. PF1412
L_ J
11,11111111111111pit III III
Tuesday, June 20, 2000, T!4E DA:L1 }UL.. d L OF COMMERCE Page 25
ep -
38 PUBLISHED
161 FIRST TIME TODAY
i d NOTICE OF BUDGET HEARING
)p A meeting of the Tigard City Council will be held on Tuesday, June 27, 2000 at 1:30 p.m: in the Town Hall Room at City
Hail, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard Oregon. Included on the agenda will be a public hearing to discuss the Capital Improvement
.03 Program (CIP) and the budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2000, as approved by the City's Budget Committee. A sum-
ud = of the budget is presented below. A copy of the budget may be Inspected or obtained free of charge at 8777 SW Bum-
Lie ham (Tigard Water Building) between the hours of 0:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The budget was proposed on a basis of accounting
ryq consistent with the preceding year.
id BUDGET SUMMARY IA Resources by Fund IW*I98 Adopted 999/00 26W/p d
ao General Fund $19,128,369 $19,660,749 521,130,280
se Sanitary Sewer 7,061,244 7,625,627 9,603,639
.w Storm Sewer 1,777,511 2,122,194 2,086,312
IQ Water Quality/Quantity 1,388,667 884,688 1,684.232
)q Water 13,821,997 9,375,129 8,643,683
)S Water SDC 898,858 943,912 841,564
rD Water CIP 4,240,213 4,008,461 3,868,768
IO Criminal Forfeiture 68,917 48,228 114,709
D State Gas Tax 2,008,926 2,461,801 2,126,373
tl County Gas Tax 195,692 152,462 230,069
Traffic Impact Fee 4,358,608 4,194,129 3,654,111
Traffic Impact Fee - Urban Srvc 538,706 934,453 1,047,177
5 Electrical Inspection 307,288 371,842 247,014
Building Fund 841,296 1,064,793 1,002,449
Urban Services Fund 618,080 047,373 794,028
Underground Utility 320,190 373,205 477,392
Parks SDC 1,384,145 914,816 1,416,870
Workers Compensation 226,379 267,121 378,778
Tree Replacement 199,405 239,266 204,652
General Obligation Debt Service 1,658,881 251,030 314,200
Bancroft Bond Debt Service 5,984,170 3,974,365 4,091,320
Dartmouth LID CIP 32,079 70.W 12,753
Park Levy Improvement 223,855 218,566 225,518
Metro Greenspace 336,557 247,130 240,811
Facility Fund 265,558 267,337 1,628,163
69TH Ave. LID Fund 1,255,981 901,000 68,545
Total Revenue $69,142,572 $62,520,477 $66,131,410
1990/99 1999/00 2000/01
Actual Adopted Approved
Ad-Valorem Tax Revenues $0,617,492 $7,635,565 $8,069,452
Other Resources 60,525,080 54,884,912 58,061,958
Total Resources $69,142,5772 $62,52.^.,477 $0,131,410
2000101 Property Tax Summary General Fund Levy $8.137,307 Actual /011 Rate
2000
General Obligation Debt Service Levy $286,606 $.0885
Total $8,423,913 $2.6017
Budget Committee Approved 2000101
Tcxea Estimated Total
to Balance Delinquents Levy
General Property Tax $7,649,069 $488,238 $8,137,307
Debt Service 270,383 16,223 286,606
Total $7,919,542 $504,461 $8,423,913
Total Levies $8,423,913
Less Estimated Delinquents (5(4,461)
Plus prior years collections 150,000
Total Ad-Valorem Tax Revenues $8,069,452
The City of Tigard's permanent rate set by Mcssure 50 is $2.5132 per thousand dollars of assessed value. The estimated rate
for debt service is $.0885 for a total estimated rate of $2.6017 per thousand dollars of assessed value.
Expenditure Summary by,Category
Actual
Meeting Notice
Tigard City Council
Supplemental Budget Hearing for Fiscal Year 1999-00
June 27, 2000 - 7:30 p.m.
Tigard City Hall - Town Hall
13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon
Increase appropriations for Capital Improvements in the 69th Avenue Local Improvement
District (LID) Fund by $403,530 and recognize additional revenue of note proceeds of
$475,000. A supplemental budget is needed to authorize spending of the note proceeds
received after the Fiscal Year 1999-00 Budget was adopted.
PUBUSHED
FIRST TIME TODAY
MEETING klYnCE .
Amh TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
Supple~r+entai Budget Heering for Fts-
cal Year 1899-00, June 27, 2000 7:30
pp m., Tigard City Hall. Town Hall, 13125
S.W Hall Boulevard. Tigard, Oregon.
Increase appropriations for capital
Improvements in the eft Avenue Local
Improvement District (LID) Fund by
5403,530 and recognize additional rev-
enue Of-note _Proceeds of $475,000. A
suppleme ~ budget Is needed to autho.
rize p v the note proceeds
recelvedr aftK,1henFiscab,Yean-YewBBut~dd"~et was adopted. ,
Pub -WW 13; 2000. _ ° PF131&1t
Affidavit of Publication
n1l
0v our
nal
C onimeice
P.O. [Sox 10127 / Pon Shunt, Ort-gort 07200-0127 / (503) 226-1311 FAX (503) 222-5358
STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH,-ss.
I, I.J. CAPLAN, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Manager of the DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE, a newspaper of
general circulation in the counties of CLACKAMAS, MULTNOMAH and WASHINGTON as defined by ORS 193.010 and 193.020;
published of Portland in the aforesaid County and State; that I know from my personal knowledge that the
MEETING NOTICE
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, MEETING NOTICE
was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ppTIGAAD CITY-VIDUNCIL Fie.
ONE limo(s) csI Ow 11299-00 Budget Hwr7, 2WO, 30
in the following issues: ppm., Tiaard City Hall, Town Halt, 13125
S.vi HaS Boulevard. Tigard. Oregon.
JUNE 13, 2000 Increase appropriations for Capital-
Improvements In the 89th Avenue Loc W
Impprovement District (LID Fund by
5403,530 and recognize a ' onel rev-
enue of note proceeds of $475,000. A
suppiemental budgO is needed wautho-
riza spending of the note proceeds
Cas@ No. recekda.atten•the, F7acd-.Yes 199900
BBuuddgpet was adopted.
PubiTshed June 13, 2000., PF1319-1t
Subscribed and sworn to before ilio this
13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2000
30-1,247
This portion may be detached.
DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
P.O. Box 10127, Portland, Ore. 97296-0127
F HEATHER BURRIS
CITY OF TIGARD
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Ad. No. PF1319
TIGARD, OR 97223
J
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684.0360 Notice TT 9669
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising
( ity of Tigard Y 13 Tearsheet Notice
13125 Sly Hall Blvd.
aTigard,Oregon 97223 ® 0 Duplicate Affidavit
Accounts Payable ting average and a .512 sli
S!
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Increase ap
STATE OF OREGON, ) Local Imprc AS ALWAYS
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' tional revers i.
1, Kathy Snyder needed Kto ai FREE Z
Year 1999-0 pI rrww,~~
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising TT9669 - P +1i FEU E I
Director, or his principal clerk, of thdl!i g.arrl -TuaI - t in Times 11M0 SAst A ef%w., i
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at Tigard in the
aforesaid county and state; that the Fiscal Year 1999-00
fleeting N!Qtice:Supplemental Bic7gPt Hearing
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for ntJ>, successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
June 22,2000
I~
Subscribed and sworn to bef me th'82 a nd d a~, of ju n , 2 0 0 0
- 4T.OF-rICIAL SEAL
Rn81W ,2. BURGESS
Notary P is f r Oregon NOTARY FUe! IC-OREGON
Nly Commission Expires: COMMIS'=!014 N0. 062071
v1Y CC%'. oISS!QN EXPIRES MAY 16, 2001
AF6 iDAVIT
Mill
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice TT 9 6 4 S
BEAVERTON. OREGON 97076
Legal Notice Advertising
• Ci.t.y of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice
13125 SIJ Hall Blvd.
• Ti. ga rrl , Or. egon 9 7 2 2 3 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit
Accounts Payable •
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON, )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss.
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of thdCigaY~-Tualatin Times
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at Tigard in the
aforesaid county and state; that the P.r.oposed Pe.rmi-t
-P.ub1j..c Hearing Rescheduler11 FPp Tnrreace.
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire Issue of said newspaper for `0lffi successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
B t_V IS te 25 2 0 0 0 OFFICIAL SEAL
SUZETTE 1. CURRAN
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
COMMISSION NO.329400
-
n MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV. 28, 2003
~~d_114
Subscribed and sworn to bb a me thi ' of May , 2 0 0 0
Notary Public for Oregon
My Commission Expires:
AFFIDAVIT -
cr>nr 0F rlGa>ga ,
g0TICIE_0F P"POSE®"PERMIT FEE IlVCREASh
Building Division
City of Tigard, Oregon
To All Interested Parties:
The public hearing originally scheduled for May 23, 2000, has bee res-
cheduled to June 27,2000. The hearing will take place at 7:30 p.m. in
Tigard City Council Chambers, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard.
Under the provisions of ORS 455.210(3)(a), the City of Tigard will`~e-
quest the Tigard City Council to approve permit fee increases for their '
City of Tigard, Washington County Urban Services, and King City com-,
mercial and residentia! building, mechanical, plumbing, and electrical
programs. The proposed fee increase will go into effect September 1,.
2000. i
Copies of this proposal may be obtained at Tigard City Hall, or by mail
from the Building Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223,
(503) 639-4171.
For more information, please contact Gary Lampeila, Building Official
(503) 639-4171.
TT9648 - Publish May 18. 2000.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In the Matter of the Proposed
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
City of Tigard )
egin first duly sworn, on oath,
depose and ay:
That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance
Number (s) 0 )
which were adopted at the Council Meeting date copy(s)
of said ordinance(s) being eto attached and by ference made a part hereof, on the _
day of , 20
1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
2. Tigard Library, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
3. Tigard Water Department, 8777 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 20c
N
Notary Public for Oregon
OFFICIAL. SEAL.
NOTAR Y UB{~ VC-OREGON My Commission Expires: l
} AL-
COMMSSM NO.3MM
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB. 11, 2003
"EXHIBIT A"
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 00- .2-3
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LANGUAGE OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW DAY CARE USES IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES
WHEREAS, the applicant requested a Zone Ordinance Amendment to allow day care uses either
conditionally or outright in all industrial zones; and
WHEREAS, the City Council opened a Public Hearing on the request on April 11, 2000 and heard
testimony on April 25, 2000 and indicated they were supportive of the proposed zone change and directed
staff to prepare langauge and an Ordinance for Council review and approval; and
WHEREAS, Staff prepared recommended language and an Ordinance which was discussed at the
June 20, 2000 City Council work sesssion; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the proposed language adequately addressed concerns
regarding protecting both the proposed daycare uses, as well as, existing adjacent industrial uses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines
adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; any federal or state statutes or regulations found
applicable; any applicable Metro regulations; any applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies; and any
applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found the following to be the only applicable review criteria:
Community Development Code Sections 18.380 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Policies 5 and 12.3;
The Metro 2040 Plan; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 12 and 14; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zone ordinance amendment is
consistent with the applicable review criteria and that approving the request would be in the best interest
of the City of Tigard.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
SECTION 1: The specific text amendements attached to this Ordinance are hereby adopted and
approved by the City Council.
n
PASSED: This o~ day of `JtA iZEJ .2000.
• -~"~taye~-ity-e~`
Brian J. Moore, Council President
ATTEST•
Greer A. Gaston, Deputy City Recorder
ORDINANCE NO. 00- 3 i:\curpln\julia\zoal999-03ORDdoc
Page 1 of I 19-1un-00/9:47 AM
**DRAFT**
PROPOSED CHANGES FOR OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USE, WITH RESTRICTIONS
TABLE 18.530.1
USE TABLE: INDUSTRIAL ZONES
USE CATEGORY I-P I- I-H
RESIDENTIAL
Household Living R' R' R'
Group Living N N N
Transitional Housing N N N
Home Occupation N N N
CIVIC (INSTITUTIONAL)
Basic Utilities C C P
Colleges N N N
Community Recreation N N N
Cultural Institutions N N N
Day Care R2 ' 2 R'=' R39
Emergency Services P P P
Medical Centers N N N
Postal Service P P P
Public Support Facilities P P P
Religious Institutions N N N
Schools N N N
Social/Fraternal Clubs/Lodges N N N
COMMERCIAL
Commercial Lodging P N N
Eating and Drinking Establishments Rs N N
Entertainment-Oriented
- Major Event Entertainment N N N
- Outdoor Entertainment P N N
- Indoor Entertainment P N N
- Adult Entertainment N N N
General Retail
- Sales-Oriented R2 N N
- Personal Services R2 N N
- Repair-Oriented P N N
- Bulk Sales N N N
- Outdoor Sales N P P
- Animal-Related P P P
Motor Vehicle Related
- Motor Vehicle Sales/Rental N P P
- Motor Vehicle Servicing/Repair C P P
- Vehicle Fuel Sales P P/C' P
Office P N N
Self-Service Storage P P P
Non-Accessory Parking P I' P
Page I of 4
TABLE 18.530.1(CON'T)
USE CATEGORY I-P I -L III
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial Services N p p
Manufacturing and Production
- Light Industrial p p p
- General Industrial N p p
- Heavy Industrial N N P
Railroad Yards N N P
Research and Development P p p
Warehouse/Freight Movement N P P
Waste-Related N N P
Wholesale Sales R4 p p
OTHER
Agriculture/Horticulture ps Ps ps
Cemeteries N C N
Detention Facilities C N C
Heliports C C C
Mining N N P
Wireless Communication Facilities p/R6 p P
Rail Lines/Utility Corridors P P P
Other NA NA P'
P=Permitted R=Restricted C=Conditional Use N=Not Permitted
'A single-family detached dwelling or single-family mobile or manufactured home allowed for
caretaker or kennel owner/operator when located on the same lot as the permitted use and is
exclusively occupied by the caretaker or kennel owner/operator and family.
'These limited uses, separately or in combination, may not exceed 20% of the entire square
footage within a development complex. No retail uses shall exceed 60,000 square feet of gross
leasable area per building or business.
'In-home day care which meets all state requirements permitted by right.
4Permitted if all activities, except employee and customer parking, are wholly contained with a
building(s).
'When an agricultural use is adjacent to a residential use, no poultry or livestock, other than
normal household pets, may be housed or provided use of a fenced run within 100 feet of any
nearby residence except a dwelling on the same lot.
'See Chapter 18.798, Wireless Communication Facilities, for definition of permitted and
restricted facilities in the I-P zone.
'Vehicle fuel sales permitted outright unless in combination with convenience sales, in which
case it is permitted conditionally.
'I"xplosive storage permitted outright subject to regulations of Uniform Fire Code.
= Day care uses %vith over 5 children arc perrnq!t d subject to an linvironmcntal Impact Assessment in
accordance with 18.530.050.0.1 The design of the day care must frill comPl with State of Grego n
jKcAuuUments ror outdoor op(.Lm1 ace setbacks.
Page 2 of 4
18.530.040 Development Standards
A. Compliance required. All development must comply with:
1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district,
except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with
Chapters 18.370.
2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title.
B. Development Standards, Development standards in industrial zoning districts are contained
in Table 18.530.2 below:
TABLE 18.530.2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES
STANDARD I-P I-L I-H
Minimum Lot Size None None None
Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft.
Minimum Setbacks
- Front yard 35 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft.
- Side facing street on comer &
through lots [1] 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft.
- Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] 0150 ft. [3] 0150 ft. [3]
- Rear yard 0150 ft. [3][4] 0150 ft. [3] 0150 ft. [3]
- Distance between front of garage
& property line abutting a public
or private street
Maximum height 45 ft. 45 ft. 45 ft.
Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75 % [5) 85% 85%
Maximum Landscape Requirement 25 % [6] 15% 15%
[1] The provisions of Chapter 18.795 (Vision Clearance) must be satisfied.
[2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces.
[3] No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning
district.
i
i [4] Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy
11.5.1.
i
[5J Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80% if the provisions of Section 18.530.05013 are satisfied.
[6] Except that a reduction to 20% of the site may be approved through the site development review
process.
I
I-P - Industrial Park District
I-L - Light Industrial
I-11 - Ileavy Industrial
Page 3 of 4
18.530.050 Additional Development Standards
A. Commercial lodging in the I-P zone. The following development standards shall apply for a
commercial lodging facility located in the I-P zone:
1. Site size shall be a minimum of two acres and a maximum of five acres.
2. The site shall have access to be approved by the City Engineer to an arterial or major
collector street with capacity sufficient to ensure that adequate access to local businesses
is maintained.
3. Ancillary uses, also permitted in the I-P zone as contained in Chapter 18.530 shall be
allowed as integral elements of the commercial lodging development, provided they
comprise no more than 20% of total floor area.
4. Signage shall conform to Chapter 18.780.
B. Reduction of lot coverage requirements. Lot coverage may be increased from 75% to 80% as
part of the site development review process, providing the following requirements are
satisfied:
1. The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 20% of the site.
2. The applicant shall meet the following perfo+,..ance standards with regard to the
landscaping plan approved as part of the site development review process:
a. Street trees, as required by Section 18.745.040 C1 are to be installed with a minimum
caliper of three inches rather than the two inches as measured at four feet in height;
b. The landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum
width of 10 feet;
c. All applicable buffering, screening and setback requirements contained in Section
18.745.050 shall be satisfied.
d. The applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance
program to ensure appropriate irrigation and maintenance of the landscape area.
C. Day care uses The following standards shall apply for commercial day care uses in
industrial zones:
1. The Environmental Impact Assessment must document noise, visible emissions.
vibration, odor, glare and heat fi-om uses within one quarter mile. A plan and program
for day care facilities to provide mitigation on-site for any of the above off-site impacts
must be provided. Sound attenuation walls, screening. window covering. shades, and
other such means are appropriate :Weans of mitigation and may be attached as conditions
gUIPMoval.
2. Tlie State of Oregon Child Care Division Certification Section shall be notified of the
proposed site pl•+ns prior-to tiubmittin ai_application to insure that the plans submitted
Vellellilly address thc~~cnnitting rce uiremcnts.
RUNC ul'a )r)osed day care evidence of'certification through the State of
3 Prior to ocII
Orel,on Child Care Division shall be provided.
1Acurpln\julia\zoa\zoa 1999-02 proposed changes.doc
Page 4 of*4
S+ud
Agenda Item No. 5`
June 14, 2000 Meeting of (a, qQ
TO: Mayor Nicoli and City Council
FROM: Sandy Zodrow, Human Resources Direct /
RE: Final benefit recommendations from the Management Classification and
Compensation Study
As you will recall, the Council has already adopted the final salary
recommendations resulting form the recently completed Management Job
Classification and Compensation Study. We indicated at your May 23, 2000
meeting that the final benefit recommendations were not yet completed and
would be ready and presented at your June 27th meeting. The Study Task Force,
comprised of the department directors, Human Resources staff, and consultant,
Doug Johnson, Johnson & Associates, have completed their review. The
following information is presented for your consideration.
The benefit part of the Job Classification and Compensation Study surveyed the
seven (7) comparable cities which the City of Tigard uses as an external labor
market to compare itself against with regards to salaries and fringe benefits.
They include the Cities of Lake Oswego, West Linn, Hillsboro, Beaverton,
Gresham, Milwaukie, and Oregon City. Based on that data and numerous
discussions with the Study Task Force, they recommended the following benefit
changes be forwarded to Council for their consideration.
1) Currently the Management/Supervisory/Confidential Group Employees
Personnel Policies, which the City Council adopted in November, 1998,
provide department directors with the ability to flex work schedules or to
award compensatory time off (hour for hour) to certain management positions
(designated as M-2 employees) when their workload requires them to work in
excess of their normal week. Although it is the policy of the City to discourage
and reduce to a minimum the necessity for overtime, there are times when
these employees are required to put in extra hours. Such is the case with
Lieutenants in the Police Department who may be involved in an emergency
situation or some other work issue requiring them to remain on the job after
hours, sometimes for long periods of time.
The policies allow a department director to flex this person's schedule to
acknowledge the overtime worked, or to provide them hour for hour
compensatory time. However, in the Police Department, it is difficult for a
Lieutenant to take time off and also problematic to flex their schedule. The
demands of a 24-7, 3 shift operation, do not easily allow flexible scheduling or
the ability to provide additional time off without bringing in other personnel to
maintain adequate coverage.
The benefit change requested by the Task Force is to amend the
Pe aon.nel Policies for the Management, Supervisory, Confidential
Employee Group to allow the Police Department to provide a cash
option for overtime worked for Lieutenants only. Therefore, in this case
a Lieutenant may be provided compensatory time (hour for hour), a
flexible schedule, or cash for the overtime worked, at the option of the
department director, and with due consideration to budgetary and
operational needs. This change has been requested by the Police
Department, and was not of interest to other department directors who
are able to use the flexible scheduling and/or compensatory time more
easily.
According to Chief Goodpaster, the department estimates that the cost for
adding this benefit for the Lieutenants for FY 2000-2001 would be
approximately $6,737.
2) The second recommendation from the Study Task Force involves a proposed
City contribution towards a Deferred Compensation Plan. Deferred
compensation is an additional retirement plan available through the City to all
employees on a voluntary basis. The intent of the deferred compensation plan
is to allow employees to make pre-tax contributions through payroll deduction
to increase their final retirement benefit amount. Currently 41 out of 74
Management/Supervisory/Confidential Group Employees participate in this
voluntary retirement program.
The issue of a City contribution towards a deferred compensation plan for
management personnel was first discussed with Council a year or two ago by
the City Manager. At that time, Council had expressed no objection to
reviewing this matter for this group at a later time. During the Management
Job Classification and Compensation Study, management employees voiced
an interest in the idea. The Study Task Force reviewed the matter, and also
decided to recommend this benefit change to Council.
The Task Force has requested that Council considered a City
contribution towards deferred compensation with the following criteria:
a) Employees must participate in one of the City's deferred
compensation programs in order to receive any City match funds.
b) The employee's contribution must be equal to or greater than the
City's contribution
^v) `-pl.- GQ2 c:arre:~tl, og%ntrlbuting the m ximurn amount allowed
by the IRS will have the option of using the City's contribution
amount to decrease their maximum contribution by the
percentage adopted by Council
Council will find enclosed Attachment A, which summarizes the current
participation in the program as well as the total costs for various percentage
contributions. The Study Task Force did not recommend a specific
percentage contribution, as they felt this was Council's decision. Please note
that the total costs indicated are based on all of the management employees
participating in the matching program. The costs will be less if some
employees elect not to participate.
3) At the time that the issue of a City contribution towards a deferred
compensation plan first came up in a discussion with Council, the City
Manager also suggested that the City should review the Public Employees
Retirement System (PERS) as a possible option to the City's current
retirement plan. Currently the only City employees who participate in PERS
are the Police Department sworn officers. Other City employees participate in
the ICMA retirement plan offered by Tigard. Many public jurisdictions
participate in PERS (816, 407 classified as local government employers),
which has had some effect on the ability of the City to recruit other public
sector employees and retain employees who wished to leave for employers
who offered PERS. All of the City of Tigard's comparable cities are members
of PERS. However, we have no data to support how little or large a problem
this may be for the City of Tigard.
L4 The City Council authorized some funds for PERS to conduct an actuarial
study to determine what rates the City might expect to pay should they decide
to convert to PERS. This study has been completed. Human Resources along
with the Finance Department, have research the preliminary issues. This
matter does not come as a recommendation from the Study Task Force
as a benefit change. The Task Force took no position one way or the
other. In fact, this matter has not been discussed with anyone other than the
a
Executive staff until the City Council is able to look at the information. The
City is unable to obtain a list of former PERS members from PERS to
determine any possible level of interest among the management group
employees or other City employees. This matter is being presented at this
time because of its relationship to the overall benefit package for
management personnel. Staff is prepared to present the cost and analysis
information they have collected.
Very briefly, on the "pro" side of converting to PERS, the City of Tigard would
probably:
1) Be better able to attract employees from other public sector agencies
2) Retain some current employees who might otherwise leave for better
retirement packages, particularly former PERS members
On the "con" side:
1) PERS may be a more expensive retirement plan than ICMA to offer
2) Employer rates under PERS are not negotiable and out of the City's
control
3) Once the City joins PERS, it may not opt out of the program
Council will find attachments in their materials which further review this matter.
They include:
a) Attachment B - PERS Conversion Options (outlines the cost)
b) Attachment C - Pros and Cons of the PERS plan
c) Attachment D - Retirement Benefits - Comparable Cities
d) Attachment E City Retirement Benefits
Should Council wish to pursue this matter further, the next logical step would be
to present this idea to employees to determine if there is sufficient interest in
offering this program.
I~
ATTACHMENT A
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
June 2000
Number of Management/Professional Staff 74
Number of Current Deferred Comp Participants: 41
Total Deferred Comp Contributions for This Group: $7,062.95
Number of People Currently Maximizing Contributions: 3
Annual Group Salary $4,329,844.00
1% of Annual Group Salary $43,298.44
2% of Annual Group Salary $86,596.88
3% of Annual Group Salary $129,895.32
4% of Annual Group Salary $173,193.76
5% of Annual Group Salary $216,492.20
sbVetirelproposed def comp for mgmt-prof 6-00
ATTACHMENT B
PERS Conversion Options
Prospective & Full Integration
No Employee Contribution Pick Up
Management All Groups
• s - • - e • - • • - • e e
• Management 8.21% $468,273 $353,478 ($114.795) Management 6.25% $468,273 $355,200 ($113,073)
• OPEU 10.00% $417,067 $417,208 $141 OPEU 8.25% $417,067 $344,197 ($72.870)
• TPOA 8.21% $192,878 $226,540 $33,662 TPOA 8.25% $192,878 $227,644 $34,766
Temporary 0.00% $0 $0 $0 Temporary 0.00% $0 $0 $0
Total $1,078,218 $997,227 $80,991 Total $1,078,218 $927,041 ($151.177
Employee Contribution Off-Sets $277,875 $572,120
Total Cost/(Savings) $196,884 $420,943
• • • • - • • - - n • - • - e - - i
Management 8.57% $468,273 $368,978 ($99,295) Management 8.75% $468,273 $376,728 ($91,545)
• OPEU 10.00% $417,067 $417,208 $141 OPEU 8.75% $417,067 $365,057 ($52,010)
TPOA 8.57% $192,878 $236,474 $43,596 TPOA 8.75% $192,878 $241,441 $48,563
Temporary 0.00% $0 $0 $0 Temporary 0.00% $0 $0 $0
Total $1,078,218 $1,022,660 $55,558 Total $1,078,218 $983,225 $94.993
Employee Contribution Off-Set 6 $277,875 $572,120
Total Cost/(Savings) $222,317 $477,128
Management 12.24% $468,273 $526,988 $58,715 Management 12.78% $468,273 $550238 $81965
OPEU 10.00% $417,067 $417,208 $141 OPEU 12.78% $417,067 $533,192 $116,125
TPOA 12.24% $192,878 $337,741 $144,863 TPOA 12.78% $192,878 $352,641 $159,763
Temporary 0.00% $0 $0 $0 Temporary 0.00% $0 $0 $0
Total $1,078,218 $1,281,937 $203,719 Total $1,078,218 $1,436,071 $357,853
Employee Contribution Off-Seth $277,875 $572,120
Total Cost/(Savings) $481,594 $929,973
mow
Stay Where We Are
Rate Current Cost Future 273t Differen $
Em to ee Grou 0 $468,273 $0
11.000 $417,067 $417,067 $0
current Rates & Costs Management 00k
10.
Mt, & OPEU m 1CMA OPEU o $192,878 $192,878 $0
g Ito Pick UP 6.99 /o $0 $0 $0
TPOA= PERS, TPOA 0.006 1078,218 ars
Temporary $1,078,218 $ ill not be vested until 5 ye
Total RS Employees' or a9e 55).
in pERS begins as of the date service will be placed in Tier 2. PERS service( of the transition to PE•
Employee wthout prior PERS
s' membership laced in Tier 2. Cementati
1 Prospective or age 55). Employees
of PERS service ( People hired
hout prior PERS service will be p of Tigard or as of the date of the rmp
Employees wt on of
vested upon transfer to PER in Tier 2.
PERS begins as of the date rtherefore be will be placed
Employees' membership in Most Tigard emp Yees laced in Tier 1. All others
2 Full Integration lan (whichever is later). rior PERS service will be p
the ICMA P 1996 and people with p
allow to ees to claim ha`n°ffreauenlly unused sick leave balance at retirement to
before January 1. its emp Y by retirees. No Sick Leave means that
in which the City would used
lion
optional program
3 Sick leave ation lion it its emploYees. Participation in PERS• Does
used for calcul of retirement benefits. This op is currently rior to their the city would not offer this op purchase credit for employees City service P vice credits for calculation of
lion does increase se per month. "No Prior
ram in which the city may p or Tier Assignment. Th efit by is op about $4 P
Optional Pro! for vesting rementber would purchase this credit.
optional
Prior Service not affect calculation of time served of Prior service credit mcr Prior $er' , , means the City
• ' YP_
retirement. One year m negotiated
benefits upon would not purchase this credit st, many employe
account. In t e
'means the GitY would and
PERg would not pick-up the employee
pick-UP" ement means that Ti9
Service 0 of increaset heir. salary to No their
" fequires emploYees to Contribute 6%
this contribution in lieu of a salary 69% to
to rase salaries employee
5 Pick-Up to "pick-up be necessary he
contribution. stopped picking-UP t employthe cost
the required 6°k employee cont ribution, it may 0 increase, including
and does not pick-up to ee• (This was done when the city . 6o
If Trg This cost figure is the cost of a 6 k salary
6 Employee Contribution off-Set offset the additional cost to the Me sure 8 Compensation.
related benefits such as PERS and Workers
of salary
contribution for TPOA following MOM"
6000000MOWNW00 00000
ATTACHMENT C
PROS AND CONS OF PERS
Integration - Employees' membership in PERS is based on their enrollment date in their current ICMA plan. PERS requires the transfer of ICMA funds.
Prospective - Employees' membership in PERS is based on the implementation date of the PERS plan. Future contributions are made to PERS. The ICMA plan ceases but
employees retain their ICMA accounts.
CIAO N I G Olin EiRS (E E
.MONO Pros Cons Pros Cons
PERS Participation ➢ Requires 2/3 passing vote ➢ Require of PERS to ➢ Employer controls ➢ Employee doesn't have a
of City employees integrate other employee participation requirements choice in plan participation
➢ Employees not required to groups in future ➢ City would have only 1 plan ➢ At some point it may
participate in PERS ➢ When employee vacates a (PERS) to direct future become too costly to
➢ Employees have 1 time non-PERS position, new contributions maintain the ICMA plans
election to stay with ICMA employee is required to and PERS
participate in PERS
➢ City would be making
contributions to ICMA plans
as well as PERS (5 plans)
Tier Assignment ➢ Guarantees Tier 1 for all ➢ Employee hired and/or ➢ Employees with prior vested ➢ All employees without prior
vested employees vested after 1/96 with no PERS membership will be PERS vested membership
participating prior to 1196 prior PERS membership will Tier 1 members will be Tier 2
➢ Tier 1 guarantees 8% return be Tier 2 ➢ 21 employees will be Tier 1 ➢ Tier 2 has no minimum
on investments ➢ Tier 2 has no minimum ➢ Tier 1 guarantees 8% return guaranteed earnings on
➢ Tier 1 retirement age is 58 guaranteed earnings on on investments investments
for general employees investments ➢ Tier 1 retirement age is 58 ➢ Tier 2 retirement age is 60
➢ Tier 2 retirement age is 60 for general employees for general employees
for general employees ➢ Tier 2 does not allow use of
➢ Tier 2 does not allow use of vacation leave to increase
Nam
Cons
Cons Pros
Pros
final average salary vacation leave to increase ➢ Under Tier 2, retirement
Tier Assi nrmmerrt final average salary benefits are affected by
(Continued) ➢ Under Tier 2, retirement Worker Camp payments
benefits are affected by
Worker Comp payments
rates are re-evaluated
egins ➢ Balance of ICMA funds ➢ City must match the funds ➢ of city a specified dateutions as ➢ e ery 2 years
Contrt~buh-ons transferred ($8+M) ➢ City has no control on rates
transferred employees ➢ City rates are re-evaluated
PERS accounts every 2 years
➢ City has no control on rates
artici ation does not
➢ Employees with less than 5 ➢ Employees formerly vested ➢ ICMA p p
Vestin J> ICMA participation counts years under ICMA will need through PERS retain their count
towards vesting difference in vesting as long as they did ➢ Employees required to meet
to make up the 5-year vesting requirements
vesting time not withdraw their money
onal program ➢ increases employer rates by
➢ by ➢
Credits can be purchased @
Sick Leave Credits ➢ Optional program 313% Increases employer rates ➢ Opt as
City ity caann't revoke program
➢ Credits can be purchased @ ➢ Prospective benefit only ➢ participation
➢ Ci can't revoke program ➢ Program can be
➢ Prospective benefit only pa icipation
➢ Program can be balance is not implemented at later date Sick leave balance is not
implemented at later date ➢ Sick leave used to calculate benefits ➢ Half of unused sick leave is used to calculate benefits
➢ Half of unused sick leave is for money match formula used to calculate employee for money the most popular
used to calculate employee which is the most popular benefit amount (2 methods) fowhich is rmula used at this time
benefit amount (2 methods) formula used at this time ➢ Can increase employee's )o- program requires 100%
➢ Can increase employee's overall benefit amount participation whether
overall benefit amount ➢ Program requires 100%
participation whether employee uses one of the 2
employee uses one of the 2 formulas benefited by the
formulas benefited by the program or not
program or not
I
-4
~lu'HK11~1AII
Y~Ilf R
,....~~a~nn~PPPP rA -
S Cons
,x
tiQ ' t Cons Pros er rates by
Pros f- ram ➢ increases employ
to er rates by ➢ Optional pr o9 purchased •5%
➢ increases emp Y ➢ Credits can be p ➢ Doesn't change the tier
➢ Optional program 05% for City) service time prior to
d level or vesting
prior Servic' Credits ➢ Credits can be purchase c Doesn't change the tier
rior to PERS participation requirements
rvice time p ibili
for City se level or vesting ➢ Used to determine elig by ➢ More people would be
ICMA plan implementation requirements in PS pin-up as
for early retirement ➢ Used to determine eligibility ➢ Must choose this option at ➢ 10 years of service required com included pared to integration
for early retirement time of PERS plan for non-duty disability which would increase city
➢ 10 years of service required agreement retirement costs
for non-duty disability ➢ Increases employee
retirement retirement amount by
➢ Increases employee $4/month/prior service year
retirement amount by ➢ Employer establishes time
$4lmonthlprior service year allowance
➢ Employer establishes time
allowance
sbVeWP-RS Prosgcons
a.
1
s
ATTACHMENT
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
COMPARABLE CITIES COMPARISON
June 2000
Rn ,TSi, ,y r
i.,Wi!v . K h5Beaverton PERS 12.36% 0.00%
Gresham PERS 14.13% 0.00%
Hillsboro PERS 9.79% 6.00%
Lake Oswego PERS 15.00% 0.00%
Milwaukie PERS 16.90% 0.00%
Oregon City PERS 18.58% 0.00%
West Linn PERS 14.09% 0.00%
Tigard
Management ICMA 11.00% 0.00%
OPEU ICMA 10.00% 0.00%
Non-Sworn ICMA 10.00% 0.00%
Sworn Officers PERS 6.99% 6.00%
retire\council presentation 6-00
AT e
p~TT
T ~~~~F,SS
(~tT~ June 2000 mr; t
u Q n 0
10.00°/0 12
1988
oVember 10.00010
~ 61
OPEU July 1989 11 AO% 50
ICMA on-Sworn Police Staff al July 1985 6.99°/0
~ rofessron
ICMA a~em end P July 1989
~an p~'rcers
ICMA Swortr Police
pERS
6°l0 employee contribution
City does not pay
retire~anoit presentation g-0~
"f
'Mom
Sh id c , oSe~61arj
v - U
June 27, 2000
F TICS
OREGON
Chairman Tom Brian
Washington County Board of Commissioners
155 North First Avenue
Hillsboro, OR 97124
RE: Atfalati Recreation Partnership
Dear Tom:
The Tigard City Council is aware that the Board of Commissioners is initiating discussion of the
Atfalati Recreation Partnership request for district formation and taxing authority. As you are
aware, on behalf of the City, I signed a Memorandum of Understanding wluch was submitted as
part of the submittal package.
The Tigard City Council understands that based upon input of Bond Counsel, the current plan for
district formation provides for a permanent tax rate which would include both operating funds and
funding for capital facilities. This proposal differs from that which was discussed by the City
Council several months ago.
I expect that the City Council will have further discussion to determine if it wishes to provide
further information to you during the public hearing. I expect that in the next few weeks the Council
will decide whether it feels the need to forward a revised resolution supporting a permanent tax rate
not to exceed $0.83/1,000. We recognize that County Counsel Dan Olsen has opined that no
revisions are needed to the local resolution in order for the County to proceed with the formation of
the district. However, our Council may feel it necessary to act on the revised resolution to clarify its
position given the change in the proposed taxation for the district.
Once the City Council determines what, if any, further input it wishes to provide to the County, I
will make that information available to you as soon as possible.
Thank you for your consideration of the City's position on this issue.
Sincerely,
William A. Monahan
City Manager
cc: Tigard City Council
Dave Nicoli, Atfalati Recreation District
Steve Wheeler, City Manager of Tualatin
Pete Stidd, Acting Superintendent, Tigard-Tualatin School District
I:\NDM\BILL\CH TOM BRIAN RE ATFALATI TAXING AUTHORITY.DOC
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
JUN 26 '00 05:19PM RRMIS CREW CORRIGP.N P.2
R.AMI•s
_CREW
C:ORRIGAN &
BACHRACH, LLP
fiMMEYS AT LAW
1'127 N.w. Hoyt Street MEMORANDUM
Portland. Oregon 97209
(503) 222-4402
Fvx: (503) 243-2944
TO: Tigard City Council
Bill Monahan, City Manager
FROM: Charles E. Corrigan, Gary Firestone, City Attorney's Office
DATE: June 26, 2000
RE: Atfalati Recreation District County Authority Issue
BACKGROUND
In March, the City Council approved a resolution consenting to the formation of the Atfalati
Recreation Partnership, a county service district to be formed to provide recreation services in a
portion of Washington County, including areas within the City. The Council also authorized the City
Manager to sign a memorandum of understanding in the form attached to the resolution, or some'
other form. The MOU attached to the resolution stated that it is anticipated that the permanent tax
rate would not exceed $0.48/$1,000 and that there would be bond levies for capital facilities, subject
to voter approval. The bond levies would result in increased taxation within the District.
Since March, the County has been advised that it will not be possible to immediately authorize
the bonds. The current plan for District formation provides for permanent tax rate higher than the
anticipated $0.48/$1,000 to include funding for capital facilities. The total amount for the proposed
permanent rate equals the amount anticipated for permanent tax rate plus levies to pay bonded
indebtedness for capital improvements.
7
a Washington County Counsel Dan Olsen has concluded that the County can act on the exiiting
resolutions and that there is no reason to change the resolution or the MOU.
I
LM
jUN 2G '00 05:29PM RAMIS CREW CORRIGAN P.3
Memorandum re: Atfalati Recreation District Formation Issues
June 26, 2000
Page 2
ISSUE
Is Dan Olsen correct that the County can act on the existing resolutions to form the District
and that the MOU does not need to be revised?
ANSWER
Mr. Olsen is legally correct that no revisions are needed for the County to proceed with
formation of the District. Although no revisions are needed, the Tigard City Council may take action
to clarify its position given the change in the proposed taxation for the District.
ANALYSIS
Resolution No. 12 gave unconditional consent to the formation of the District. Nothing in the
resolution itself made the City's consent on funding or any other issue. Mr. Olsen's position that the
Resolution provided the required consent by the City is legally correct,
Resolution No. 12 also authorized the City Manager to enter into an MOU and the City
Manager did so. The MOU stated that it was anticipated that the permanent tax rate would not
exceed $0.48/51,000 but did not expressly limit the tax rate to that amount and did not make the iax
rate a condition of acceptance of the MOU• Once the District is formed, the tax rate will be an
internal matter for the District, so the MOU cannot control the future tax rate. Again, Mr. Olsen is
correct that the MOU does not prevent the District from being formed with a higher tax rate than
anticipated. A statement that a particular tax rate is anticipated does not limit the tax rate to the
stated amount. Given that additional taxation to pay bonded indebtedness for capital improvements
was anticipated, the merging of the two tax rates into a single tax rate is not so extreme as to render
the MOU ineffective. We agree with Mr. Olsen that the change in the taxation system, while different
from what was anticipated in the MOU, does not violate any express provision of the MOU and does
not require a change in the MOU.
The change in the taxation system may have some practical effect by making more of the
proposed taxation for the District subject to constitutional property tax limitations. While Mr. Olsen
is correct that no further action is needed, the City may take further action to clarify its position given
the change in the proposed taxation for the District,
~'agry•90014!atroleti, me3
AGENDA F EM EM NO. 2 - ViSi T ORIS AGENDA DATE : June 27, 2U-GU
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues
not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Manager
prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
.NAME, ADDRESS 1-4 PHONE TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED
SA~wtF Rav►,5~1 15367 5~J i=t(~'TC Clue, Pepe{ Publ~i,
11 rz~rtQ~O, o~ q'?tz3 L":F kLit-A
So - S o o pe a G~acp'
i :sh ~~rn~~ ts3so sw F;,r-k~x. CI~I.2 pt~(2er~ z
Zi rd. 9~~3
i S SU S 40 Fi {rJ
rG PSG ~ r
27
O2 -77 v
~ ~L Ay"T (z
4 fqae~
iS~Sb sw e(2- ZL-) 3103 5'9o-9S-/Z C~K~t- ~o U
(`1e~Kit 1 53T& Sco F( ~TgE6 Uie C. L UT~ ~rZPr' L ~
Ti' a b~ q 3 Sam 590 e? S /.;i-
/ ~f-loGvG i~Lt7~ /"CUO
' /}rrf~l 1 on;'rTKOr n e / r 71 T--t7
Ave ox H &x e
a.1 k . x-31 i m 3" , M L ~ bP Iris, ~ ~
fS2SivSW Lk" rl1GF~o~~
A.-14,40, Cwr)P 4VASti
32-e-7 SW ISM 7~ C L k rL Pro
7% cv ~t
Z 4 KZ,*S~- rte; u s
/5'.? 77 w~ f /Z ~ L LL,, 4--e- ?~0'' v-
7' c 7~~
~u-~ A sW Pr,.L G,u r~ P~pt-H
~,evLl t "
T (rte, G (L q rl
VISI'TOR'S AGENVA Page 1
i
AGENDA ITEM #
FOR AGENDA OF June 27, 2000
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Adoption of FY 2000-2001 Pay Plan for Management/Supervisory/Confidential
Group '
PREPARED BY: Sand Zodrow DEPT HEAD OK G 91TY1 OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Should the Council adopt the FY 2000-2001 Pay Plan for the Management/Supervisory/Confidential Group
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the FY 2000-2001 Pay Plan for this group
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City Council approved a 2.6% cost of living adjustment effective July 1, 2000 for the
Management/Supervisory/Confidential Group at their May 23, 2000 meeting. The pay plan for this group has
not been updated since July 1, 1999. This agenda item adopts the resulting pay plan for FY 2000-2001.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not applicable
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Through the offering of a competitive salary and benefit program, the City of Tigard is able to attract and retain
qualified employees who provide the services and programs outlined in the City's Visioning projects.
FISCAL NOTES
This increase has been included in the City's FY 2000-2001 budget
i:\citywide\smn.aoa
AGENDA ITEM # ,3. 2
FOR AGENDA OF June 27, 2000
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REFINANCING AND ADDITIONAL INTERIM
FINANCING FOR THE 69TH AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DTCTR,TC7.
PREPARED BY: Craig Prosser DEPT HEAD OK _ CITY MGR. OK O~Y VC YY ~~~~/I
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL,
Shall the Council approve extension and an increase in the amount of the 691h Ave. LID Bond Anticipation Note?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this resolution.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The 69`h Ave. LID was formed by Ordinance no. 99-07 to construct needed local improvements in the 69th Ave.
area. The City obtained interim financing in the amount of $1,245,000 in April 1999. The project is nearing
completion, but project costs are higher than anticipated, so additional interim financing is required.
In addition, the existing Note is scheduled to mature on October 1, 2000. Due to a legal challenge to one
property acquisition, the project will not be completed by this date. If the project is not completed, the City will
be unable to obtain long-term financing to pay off the interim Note.
The attached resolution authorizes and extension of the existing Note, with the addition of $470,000 to cover
the projected remaining costs.
Rolling the existing note 3 months early costs about $3,000 to $4,000 in additional interest costs for 3 months
(the new Note will cant' a higher interest rate than the existing note due to current market conditions). It will
simplify the process on the back end, however, when we convert to long-term financing. This means a savings
on issuance costs at that time.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Staff considered obtaining additional interim financing only, allowing the existing Note to run until its
scheduled maturity on October 1. This would save about $3,000 to $4,000 of interest costs, but creates
additional complications and costs in September when the existing Note would have to be extended. The
attached resolution therefore represents the most efficient strategy.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
N/A
FISCAL NOTES
This resolution increases interim financing from $1,245,000 to $1,750,000. The interest rate increases from 3.75%
to approximately 5.15%.
I
f
a
AGENDA ITEM No. 4 Date: June 27, 2000
ESTIM0iM1 Y
S10 -UP SHEET
Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on:
PUBLIC COMMENT
APPROVE THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001
Dane to Time Constraints
City Council May Impose
A Time Limit on Testimony
I:V.DM\GREER\CCSIGNVP\PC TESTMNY UPDATED.DOC
®R -
1111 ILA
AGENDA ITEM No. 4
PLEASE PRINT
Pro onent - (Speaking In Favor Opponent - S eakin Against) Neutral
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
AGENDA ITEM # `j'
FOR AGENDA OF June 27. 2000
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
PREPARED BY: A.P. Duenas DEPT HEAD OK O'i'~ CITY MGR OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Adoption of the FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program and approval of the FY 2000-01 projects.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, adopt the FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program and
projects as described in the attached memorandum dated June 15, 2000 with appendices A through H.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached is a memorandum dated June 15, 2000 outlining the FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program. This
memorandum, with appendices, presents the recommended projects for FY 2000-01 and a tentative list of
projects for the following six years. The FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program was presented to the
Planning Commission at its meeting on May 15, 2000. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the
proposed program with revisions as recommended by the City Engineer. Two revisions have been added since
then: one revision provides funds to close the 59th Avenue LID, and the other provides local matching funds for
design of Greenburg Road from Washington Square Drive to Tiedeman Avenue (a project approved in the
Priorities 2000 process and included in the Oregon 2000-2003 Final Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program for Federal TEA 21 funding). The latter project will be eligible for Federal funding October 2000. The
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program, with stated revisions, is submitted to City Council for review and
approval. The adopted program would be the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 2000-01.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
i Adopt the FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program with further modifications.
i
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
a
4 The FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program supports the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow Transportation and
Traffic goals of Improve Traffic Safety and Improve Traffic Flow.
a FISCAL NOTES
The FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program project amounts are based on the Finance Director's funding
projections for FY 2000-01.
1ACirywide\SumWgenda Summary for the FY 200MI C!P-Revised June I5, 2000
CITY OF TICARD
Engineering Department
Shaping A Better t ommuniq
MEMORANDUM
MY OF TIGARD
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard, OR 97223
Phone (503) 639-4171
Fax (503) 624-0752
TO: City Council
FROM: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: June 15, 2000
SUBJECT: FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
This document presents the proposed FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for review and
approval. The FY 2000-01 CIP was presented to the Planning Commission on May 15, 2000 for
review and recommendation to City Council. The Planning Commission approved the FY 2000-01 CIP
as submitted with revisions as recommended by the City Engineer. This document reflects those
revisions. Two revisions have been added since then and are described in this memorandum and
incorporated in the appendices: one revision provides funds to close the 691h Avenue LID, and the
other provides matching funds for design of Greenburg Road from Washington Square Drive to
Tiedeman Avenue (a project approved in the Priorities 2000 process and included in the Oregon 2000-
2003 Final Statewide Transportation Improvement Program). The latter project will be eligible for
funding October 2000.
Background
The long-term Capital Improvement Program, initially adopted by the City Council on August 23,
1994, identified projects for the 1994-95 CIP Program and proposed a list of projects for the next 6-
year period. The Capital Improvement Program includes improvements to the streets, storm drainage,
sanitary sewer, water and parks systems. The Engineering Department manages the street, storm
drainage, and sanitary sewer CIP's. The Public Works Department manages the Water System CIP,
while the Parks CIP is managed jointly by the Planning and Engineering Departments.
The Capital Improvement Program is updated each year, and is reviewed and approved by the City
Council. The CIP formulation is separate from the yearly operating budget process but is approved on
the same fiscal year basis as part of the overall City budget. While the program lists projects for
subsequent fiscal years, the projects shown are tentative and are subject to change during the
formulation process for each specific budget year. The CIP, through the adoption process, therefore
establishes the budget for each fiscal year and serves as a planning document to guide the
infrastructure improvements over the following 6 years. During each budget year's update, the revenue
estimates are adjusted, the project cost estimates are reviewed, and the program and project priorities
are re-evaluated based on changes in City plans, citizen input, and additional data which may become
available. The 1996-97 CIP listed a 6-year program; the 1997-98 CIP returned to the 7-year period
originally established in 1994. The 2000-01 CIP continues with the 7-year program projections.
Process
The Capital Improvement Program update process begins with citizen involvement through the Citizen
Involvement Teams. An overview of the CIP process is presented to the CIT's, usually early in the
calendar year so that the entire process can be completed and the annual CIP budget submitted to and
approved by City Council prior to the beginning of the next fiscal year (July 1). This overview was
presented during the March CIT meeting this year. The CIT meeting in April provided the CIT
members with the opportunity to provide input into the process and to nominate projects for evaluation
and possible inclusion into the program.
The Planning Commission review typically provides another opportunity for public comment on the
proposed plan. After review by the Planning Commission, the plan with subsequent modifications, if
any, is submitted, with Commission recommendation, to the City Council for review and approval.
Council may make additional modifications to the plan during its review and approval process. The
approved plan would be the approved Capital Improvement Program for the next fiscal year.
The following summarizes the program update for the 2000-01 budget year. It is important to note that
each funding source has restrictions on the types of projects that can be constructed. Projects cannot be
moved from one funding source to another. Committed projects are those projects that have been
previously approved for 1999-00 funding, but have not been completed as of June 30, 2000. The
specific lists of projects are contained in the appendices associated with each of the program areas.
2000-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
STREET SYSTEM PROGRAM
The following are the street projects proposed for FY 2000-01. A complete listing of the projects and
the full 7-year program is attached as Appendix A.
Recommended Street (Gas Tax) Projects
The gas tax revenue can be used for upgrading the collector and local streets within Tigard, without
restriction. However, this revenue is limited and is not sufficient to fund all the street improvement
needs of the City. The total State Gas Tax amount shown for the 2000-01 fiscal year is based on
current budgetary projections. There has been a substantial decrease in projected funding available for
FY 2000-01. The amount of $394,000 is approximately $150,000 less than that set aside in FY 1999-
00. As expenses increase and operational costs rise, the amount available for projects will continue to
decrease in the coming years. Although there were numerous major street projects initiated and
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 2 of 13
completed during FY 1999-00, there are several projects that require funding to be carried over into
FY 2000-01.
The following is a brief description of the projects recommended for Gas Tax Funding next year:
Committed Projects: These are projects that have been already committed
but not completed at the end of FY 1999-00.
■ 79th Avenue (Design and Right-of-way) - This project has been $65,000
awarded to an engineering consultant to design the improvements of
79th Avenue from Durham Road to Bonita Road. The sum of $65,000
needs to be carried over to FY 2000-01 to complete the design.
■ Transportation System Plan Update Study - The Transportation $12,000
System Plan Update Study is nearing completion. The draft plan has
been prepared and is now out for review. The funding carried over to
FY 2000-01 is for the consultant effort required to take the plan
through the adoption process. Adoption is expected prior to the end of
calendar year 2000.
New Projects:
6 Embedded Crosswalk Lights - This fiscal year's program provided $60,000
$30,000 to install crosswalk lights at three locations: 12151 Avenue (at
Katherine Street), 1215` Avenue (at Springwood Drive), and Walnut
Street (at Grant Avenue). The funding was not enough for
construction at all three locations, and 121st Avenue (at Katherine
Street) was selected for installation in FY 1999-00. Next fiscal year's
program includes Walnut Street (at Grant Avenue), 121St Avenue (at
Springwood Drive) and Main Street (at bridge).
i Main Street Railroad Crossing - This is a joint project between the $15,000
City and Portland & Western Railroad, Inc. This project will install a
new concrete panel at the Southern Pacific Railroad crossing on Main
Street. The City will pay for the construction costs of the concrete
panel and the roadway approaches. The Railroad company will pay
for the rails and ties and manage the project.
m Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PMMP) - This is a program $150,000
a of corrective and preventive maintenance on all paved streets in
Tigard. It addresses those streets that can still benefit from corrective
or preventative action. Last year's program expended $190,000 from
the $233,000 PMMP budget. Streets proposed to receive overlays this
' year include 12151 Avenue (Scholls Ferry Road to Springwood Drive),
98`h Avenue (at Scott Court), Walnut Street (Grant Avenue to
Pathfinder Court), 103rd Avenue (Lady Marion Drive to Murdock
Street), Del Monte Drive (106"' Avenue to 103rd Avenue), and 104th
Avenue from Del Monte to end.
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 3 of 13
Streets proposed to receive slurry seals during 2000-01 fiscal year
include 100th Avenue (at Inez Street), 110h Avenue (Tigard Drive to
end), Derry Dell Court (Park Street to Watkins Avenue), Inez Street
(100th Avenue to 550 feet west), Johnson Street (106th Avenue to
end), Pathfinder Court (Walnut Street to end) and Watkins Avenue
(Derry Dell Court to Walnut Street).
The Traffic Calming Program - This program provides funding for $30,000
traffic calming measures Citywide. The program for FY 2000-01.
includes $30,000 for City-funded projects. Much of the funding will
be used to place speed humps on streets that have clearly
demonstrated the need for installation of these traffic-calming
devices. This funding also includes completion of construction to
permanize the traffic islands on North Dakota Street between 121s'
Avenue and Springwood Drive, and landscaping of the islands
afterwards. A portion of this amount can be used on a 50-50 cost
sharing basis with residents for placement of speed humps in streets
that do not make this year's list. This year's program includes speed
humps for 135th Avenue (south of Walnut Street), Canterbury Lane
(106th Avenue to 103rd Avenue), O'Mara Street (south of Frewing
Street), Ann Street (east of 121St Avenue), Commercial Street (west of
95th Avenue), Hillshire Drive (south of Westridge Terrace), Fanno
Creek Drive (north of Weaver Way) and Lady Marion Drive (west of
100th Avenue).
■ Lincoln Street Improvements - Half-street improvements on Lincoln $30,000
Street between Greenburg Road and Commercial Street were
authorized for CDBG funding in FY 1999-00. Construction of this
project will be completed by the end of June 2000. Improvements to
the remaining half street on the east side have been approved for
CDBG funding effective July 1, 2000. The scope of this project is to
complete the full street improvements, which include street widening,
curbs, sidewalks, and streetlights.
The total project cost is $158,500 with $120,000 in CDBG funding,
$30,000 in City matching funds through the State gas tax, and $8,500
in in-kind contribution.
■ Kable Street Sidewalk - This project provides additional funding to $32,000
install sidewalk along the south side of Kable Street from its
intersection with 100th Avenue to its connection with the Erickson
Heights Subdivision. The developer is committed to paying up to
$30,000 for the walkway. The City will provide the funding for any
amount over $30,000.
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 4 of 13
Recommended TIF ff afc Impact Fee) Projects
TIF Funding can be used only for highway and transit capital improvements that provide additional
capacity to major transportation systems. This funding is limited to major collector and arterial streets,
and 50% must be spent on arterial streets. A major portion of these funds was held in reserve until our
transportation planning is completed. The first major project to use the TIF funding is the
Walnut/Tiedeman Intersection Realignment project. The next projects in priority for design and
construction are Gaarde Street and Burnham Street. The Transportation System Update Plan has made
significant progress with the draft plan recently completed. The projects proposed in the FY 2000-01
CIP are high priority projects in the Transportation Plan. However, there will not be sufficient funding
in the TIF to complete all the projects that are envisioned over the next 5 to 10 years. A Transportation
Bond Task Force formed in April 1999 has selected projects for a proposed bond issue in the
November 2000 election ballot. That proposed transportation bond, if approved by the voters, would
provide a major amount of the funding for transportation-related improvements Citywide. In the
meantime, the TIF will be utilized to design some of the potential bond projects, and to reconstruct and
expand portions of the major collectors within the City.
The TIF-funded projects proposed for the next CIP Budget Year are as follows:
■ Committed Projects:
4 Gaarde Street - This project is the design and right-of-way acquisition $1,600,000
for Gaarde Street from Highway 99W to 121St Avenue (Phase 2), and
the construction of Gaarde Street from the Quail Hollow subdivision
to its intersection with Walnut Street (Phase 1). This includes paving
of the second lift of pavement from Eagle Point to Quail Hollow-
West. The design of Phase 1 was completed in FY 1999-2000. Phase
1 construction is expected to begin July 2000 and should be
completed by mid-November 2000.
m Burnham Street Reconstruction and Widening (Design and Right-of- $350,000
Way) - This project is the design of Burnham Street for development
to ultimate width from Main Street to Hall Boulevard. An engineering
consultant began the design work in April 2000. Design and right-of-
way acquisition will be completed this fiscal year. Construction of the
project will be programmed in future budgets.
i
® Walnut Street/Tiedeman Avenue Intersection Realignment and $265,000
i Signalization (Construction) - This project has been under
+ construction since August 1999 and will be completed by September
2000.
a New Projects:
a o Dartmouth Street (1300 feet west of 72"d Avenue) - This project will $120,000
widen approximately 400 feet of Dartmouth street to the ultimate
width of a major collector road, construct curb and sidewalk and
possibly extend the existing culvert to accommodate the widening.
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 5 of 13
Greenburg Road (Washington Square Drive to Tiedeman Avenue) - $35,000
This project is the preliminary engineering to widen Greenburg Road
to its ultimate alignment within the project limits. The design and
construction of this project was submitted for approval through
Metro's Priorities 2000 program (TEA 21 Federal Funding) and was
approved for preliminary engineering only. The funding shown is the
local matching required for those Federal dollars. The total project
cost is expected to be $301,000.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Project: $158,500
Half-street improvements on Lincoln Street between Greenburg Road and
Commercial Street were authorized for CDBG funding in FY 1999-00.
Construction of this project will be completed by the end of June 2000.
Improvements to the remaining half street have been approved for CDBG funding
effective July 1, 2000. The scope of this project is to complete the full street
improvements, which include street widening, curbs, sidewalks, and streetlights.
The total project cost is $158,500 with $120,000 in CDBG funding, $30,000 in
City funding through the State gas tax, and $8,500 in in-kind contribution.
Washington County Roadway Maintenance Projects $112,000
These projects are funded by Washington County for slung seals and overlays on
County Roads covered under the Urban Services Agreement. The funding for FY
2000-01 includes $64,000 under the County Road Fund (collectcrs only) for
overlay of Bull Mountain Road. The remaining $48,000 is for overlays and
slurry seals on roads covered under the Urban Road Maintenance District
funding for non-collectors within the County.
69th Avenue Local Improvement District (LID) $68,545
This amount is to close out the 69th Avenue LID. Activities include completion
of all land acquisition activities, determination and adoption of the final
assessment, and levying of the final assessment on each lot included in the LID.
Underground Utility Fund Projects $170,000
121st Avenue/Walnut Street Intersection Signalization - This is the $150,000
undergrounding of utilities on the MSTIP 3 Project at Walnut and
121st Avenue. The County does not typically underground utilities,
so the City will have to pay for placing the utilities underground. The
funding will be in the amount of $150,000 from the Underground
Utility Fund.
■ Kable Street Sidewalk - The amount of $20,000 is allocated for $20,000
underground utility work that may be necessary in the construction of
the Kable Street Sidewalk.
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 6 of 13
fir
PARKS SYS'T'EM PROGRAM
Introduction
As with previous CIP plans, this year's proposed parks CIP includes projects budgeted for 2000-01, but
in a departure from tradition, does not include an additional six-year list of tentative projects. The
reason for not compiling a list of tentative projects for the years 2001-07 has to do with uncertainties
regarding changes to the system development charge (SDC) fee structure and with Cook Park funding
requirements over the next few years.
The park SDC is the City's primary and most consistent funding source for park improvements. The
current fee schedule was adopted in 1996 and applies to new development within the incorporated
area. In January, 1999, the City completed an updated park SDC study, which covered the following
options: (1) extension of a park SDC to the Urban Services area, (2) adoption of an aut:,matic
escalator, and (3) updating of the current City limits SDC fee schedule to current dollars. In February
1999, following review of the SDC study results, Council opted not to revise the existing fees on
development inside the City, and instead directed staff to pursue with the County the extension of an
SDC to the Urban Services Area. In order to charge a parks SDC in the Urban Services area, the City
must obtain specific legal authority from the County. The City has had discussions with the County on
octaining this legal authorization, but to date has not yet obtained it. Council is scheduled to revisit the
SDC issue in late May. In combination with development activity, Council's decisions regarding fee
levels and the County's attitude toward an Urban Services SDC will determine how much in SDC
funding will be available for future park improvements. These decisions could affect available SDC
funding by as much as 50%. In accordance with prudent budget practice, the 2000-01 CIP is based on
no-change in present fee levels. However, this is not a realistic assumption in terms of future budget
years.
The, other reason for forgoing the six-year project list is the Cook Park Expansion. Cook Park is the
current priority of the City. It will be the primary focus in FY 2000-01 and the following two or more
years. A major unknown in putting together a parks CIP is the extent, timing, and cost of the Cook
Park Expansion. A design study to provide construction cost estimates is in progress. For present
purposes, estimated amounts provided in the 1997 Cook Park Master Plan have been included in the
2000-01 budget. Although it is known that Cook Park will account for a substantial portion of future
year budgets, costs estimates will be needed before future CIP programs can be determined.
In summary, in the absence of a known SDC fee structure and Cook Park cost information, it was not
practical to put together a list of tentative 2001-07 projects. For the same reasons, with the exception
of a park SDC study and a trail feasibility study (to be undertaken in cooperation with other
jurisdictions and Metro), no new projects, or projects that will be funded for the first time, are
proposed for the 2000-01 CIP.
Last Year's Parks CEP
As a result of park SDC revenue shortfalls during FY 99-00, several projects scheduled for current
year implementation were postponed indefinitely. These included: Woodard Park Play Structure,
Woodard Park Improvements, Fanno Creek Park Trail Lighting, Fowler School/Woodard Park Trail,
Grant Avenue/Main Street Trail, Fenced Dog Park, Playgrounds Upgrade, and Realignment of the
Trail at North Dakota.
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 7 of 13
Greenspaces
Greenspaces Local Share is the portion of the regional Greenspaces bond measure revenues passed
through to local park providers for local scale Greenspaces projects. These funds may be spent only on
Greenspaces and trails related projects. The Greenspaces Local Share funding program expires
12/31/00. Under the City's Local Share IGA with Metro, the City is obligated to spend down its
remaining Greenspaces allocation of $243,071 by the end of calendar year 2000. As such, all of the
Greenspaces-funded CIP projects are scheduled for completion by summer/fall 2000.
Project Descriptions
Projects scheduled for 2000-01 implementation are briefly described as follows. The complete project
listings are shown in Appendix B.
NProjects:
® Cook Park, Phase I - Wetlands mitigation, parking lot construction, $1,142,000
butterfly garden construction, park infrastructure improvements,
underground utilities, restroom installation, and creation of an
emergency access from 85`h Avenue.
Summerlake Master Plan - Update park master plan, with public $2,003
involvement. This nearly complete project is on hold pending the
completion of the Summer Lake Water Quality Project.
SDC Study - Update 1999 study to reflect current conditions. $6,896
Greenspaces Land Acquisition - Acquire two properties within the $30,000
Fanno Creek greenway for future trail right-of-way.
Trail Route Study - Partner with Metro and other jurisdictions on joint $5,000
Fanno Creek regional trail feasibility and route study.
Main/Ash Trail - Obtain right-of-way, install boardwalk, bridge, and $190,000
install paved path between Main and existing Fanno Creek trail
segment. This amount assumes the land acquisition and other
miscellaneous costs are already expended in FY 1999-00.
■ Tigard/Tiedeman Trail - Install 1,800-foot segment of Fanno Creek $167,311
trail including bridge over Summer Creek.
Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Mitigation - Enhance 1.2 acres of wetlands $42,500
within the Fowler School floodplain. This work is required to
compensate for the unavoidable wetland impacts of the Fowler School
and Ash Creek Trail projects. The project includes construction and
professional management and monitoring services.
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 8 of 13
Cache Creek Park Addition/Stanley Property - Acquire 8-acre addition $150,000
to nature park, financed by state grant and a Trust for Public Lands
value donation. The required $150,000 cash contribution will be in the
form of a donation from the Trust for Public Lands. No City dollars
will be involved in the project.
■ Bond Street Park/Gage Property - Acquire land for 4-acre $0
neighborhood park financed by state grant. No City dollars.
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM AEROGRAM(
The sanitary sewer funding has funding sources that are reserved for maintenance repairs on currently
unknown projects, capacity upgrades as recommended from the USA Master Plan, and for the
Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extension Programs. The unrestricted portion of the
Sanitary Sewer Fund can be used for repair and maintenance projects Citywide and for extension of the
existing system to unsewered areas. The annexation of Walnut Island and ancillary islands brings new
areas requiring extension of sewers into the City. The detailed project listing for 2000-01, together
with the full 7-year program, is attached as Appendix C.
The projects that are proposed for Sanitary Sewer Funding are as follows:
■ Committed Projects:
■ Commercial Street to Burnham Road - $100,000 was funded in FY $150,000
1999-2000. This project will upsize approximately 1,250 feet of
sanitary sewer between Commercial Street and Burnham Road. The
design has been completed and construction will begin August 2000.
Bonita Road (at Milton Court) -This project is to replace or relocate $75,000
approximately 250 feet of 8-inch sanitary sewer pipe that crosses
Fanno Creek at Milton Court. This segment of line has required
monthly cleaning for many years. The grade of the existing pipe is
extremely poor and there is evidence of severe bellying. This project
resolves the maintenance issues at this location.
■ Sanitary Sewer Facility Plan Studies - The preparation of a $25,000
Comprehensive Public Plan for sewers, both storm and sanitary, is one
of the City Council goals. This provides funds for the preparation of
the Public Facility Plan for sanitary sewers, and for studies necessary
in the preparation of the plan.
■ New projects:
■ Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extension Programs - The $1,000,000
Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program has been a highly successful
program commencing with its implementation in the 1996-97 CIP
budget year. Last fiscal year's program included 85 homes by
constructing six reimbursement districts. Due to annexation of Walnut
island and ancillary islands, next year's funding is increased to
$1,000,000 to include projects in the newly annexed areas, as well as
other areas throughout the City.
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 9 of 13
■ Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program - These funds would be $40,000
used to contract out sewer repair projects that are beyond the repair
capabilities of the Public Works Department. This program is expected
to be a continuing program in future years. The Sanitary Sewer Major
Maintenance program in FY 2000-01 will include projects located at
various locations in the City.
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PROGRAM
The storm drainage funding has the same mix of sources as the sanitary sewer fund. The funding is
generally reserved for currently unknown small projects that come up during the year. Funding from
the new SDC's must be used on projects designated on the USA Master Plan. One of the major
objectives for the Engineering Department during the next fiscal year is the development of a
Comprehensive Public Facility Plan for Storm Drainage, in accordance with a City Council goal. Once
the plan is developed and projects are identified and prioritized, implementation of project design and
construction will be incorporated into the annual CIP budget. The Public Facility Plan projects are
expected to be initiated in FY 2000-01. Until the Plan is developed and adopted, non-SDC funded
projects selected for incorporation in the CIP budget will be on a case-by-case basis with emphasis on
resolving relatively small-scale, severe drainage problem areas.
The detailed and complete project listing is attached as Appendix D. The projects proposed for CIP
Budget Year 2000-01 are described as follows:
Storm Drainage Projects
■ Committed Project:
■ 118`h Court Storm Drainage Project - This project resolves storm $20,000
drainage issues by intercepting flows across Gaarde Street and
directing these flows to the ravine adjacent to 118th Court. The project
construction is underway, but will not be completed until July 2000.
0 118th Court Erosion Control - This is an erosion control project that $40,000
extends the previously installed improvements further downstream to
alleviate the heavy erosion on the side slopes and streambed. The
design will be completed in July and construction is expected to begin
this summer.
o New projects:
® Walnut Street Storm Drainage Improvements - Upgrade the inadequate $160,000
storm drainage system at the east end of the MSTIP 3 project at the
Walnut Street/121" Avenue intersection and route it easterly to an
existing culvert crossing Walnut Street. This project includes upgrade
of the outfall north of Walnut Street. The scope includes project
design, any land acquisition and water quality facilities needed for the
project, as well as any permits necessary to perform the entire scope of
work.
■ Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program - This program addresses $80,000
minor storm drainage problems requiring more than normal
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 10 of 13
maintenance effort. This year's program includes drainage repairs at
Katherine Street (at 12151 Avenue), Ann Court (at 124`h Avenue) and
Tigard Street (east of Grant Street).
■ Kable Street (between Hoodview Drive and IOe Avenue) - Currently, $45,000
surface water runoff is collected and conveyed through an existing
drainage system in Kable Street that is under-capacity and consists of
failing pipe materials. This project will upgrade the existing pipes and
install additional catch basins and maniluics.
■ Storm Drainage Analysis for Washington Square Implementation - $14,000
This funding supplements the TGM grant for the Implementation
Study of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan. The grant is
not sufficient to include all the components required. This funding will
address the storm drainage component of the implementation Plan.
Water Quality Projects:
■ Committed Projects:
■ Washington Square Pretreatment - This project installs a stormwater $100,000
pretreatment facility at Ash Creek between Toys R Us and LP Gas that
will physically and biochemically remove pollutants from the ntnoff
draining Washington Square.
■ Summer Creek Wetland Restoration at 1215` Avenue - This project $260,000
provides improved water quality and wildlife habitat along a portion of
Summer Creek by creating areas that will fill with water during
periods of high flow and by establishing native riparian plants.
■ New Project:
■ Summer Lake Improvements - This project provides funding for $350,000
improvements to Summer Lake. It includes the preparation of the
conceptual plan for implementation, preparation of the detailed project
design, and construction of the improvements. The Summer Lake Task
Force appointed by City Council will be working with a consultant,
and the various stakeholders to develop a concept plan that would be
acceptable to all concerned parties and the regulatory agencies. The
amount allocated under this project will provide the funding to develop
the concept plan, complete the project design, and possibly construct
or begin construction of the project (depending upon the costs
estimated at that time for implementing the project).
■ Wetland Mitigation (Tiedeman Avenue at Fanno Creek and 130`x' $10,000
Avenue at Summer Lake) - This mitigation planting will install a mix
of trees and shrubs along the banklines to replace the existing trees that
were washed out during the high water flows.
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 11 of 13
GENERAL FUND PROJECTS
The projects funded through the General Fund typically involve City Infrastructure improvements. The
projects included under the Capital Improvement Program for FY 2000-01 are listed as follows and are
also shown in Appendix E:
New Projects:
City IIa71 Parlring Lot Lights -This is a joint project between PGE and $6,500
the City to provide additional lighting to the main parking lot. PGE
will be responsible for the majority of the project cost, and the City
will contribute $6,500 for the project.
■ Roof Replacement (Niche Building) - This project will remove the $13,000
existing roof of the Niche building and install a new composition roof.
® HVAC Replacement (Police Building) - This project will remove and $125,000
replace the existing HVAC unit in the Police Department.
e New Library (Programming, Design and Site Selection) - This project $200,000
includes programming and site selection for the proposed new library.
It also includes funding to begin the design work, which is anticipated
to be completed in FY 2001-02.
WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM
The Water System projects and funding are decided by the Public Works Department with the
approval of the Intergovernmental Water Board. The list of water system projects for the upcoming
fiscal year, and for the next six years afterwards is attached as Appendix F.
The following are the Water System Projects for FY 2000-01:
■ Waterline Replacement (SW Walnut Street between SW 128th $305,520
Avenue and SW 132nd Avenue at the New Gaarde Extension).
Replacement of 1,000 feet of 12-inch and 1,000 feet of 6-inch cast
iron water main with 24-inch ductile iron water main. This project
is in conjunction with the Gaarde Street Extension Project.
o Waterline Replacement (SW Lincoln Street from SW Greenburg $60,000
Road to SW 91st Avenue). Replacement of 800 feet of 6-inch cast
iron water main with 6-inch ductile iron pipe.
m PRV (Pressure Reducing Valve) Installation at SW Gaarde Street. $150,000
Installation of a PRV station, and associated piping near the
intersection of SW Rose Vista and SW Gaarde Street.
ASR (Aquifer Storage and Recovery) Project with the City of $25,000
Beaverton. Assessment of the feasibility of a joint ASR project
near SW Scholls and Loon Drive.
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 12 of 13
■ Waterline Installation (SW Burnham Street from SW Hall Blvd to $319,200
SW Main Street). Installation of approximately 2,100 feet of 16-
inch ductile iron water main as part of the Burnham Street
Improvement Project.
■ Waterline Replacement (SW Walnut Street and SW 121st $376,280
Avenue). Replacement of existing 12-inch and 6-inch cast iron
water mains with 900 feet of 24-inch and 1,500 feet of 12-inch
ductile iron water mains.
■ New Transmission Main at Menlor Reservoir Site (Menlor $152,000
Reservoir Site to SW Sunrise Lane). Installation of a new 16-inch
transmission main to convey water to the proposed 550-foot
elevation reservoir location.
■ Bull Mountain PR V. Construction of a pressure reducing station $40,000
within a new subdivision on Bull Mountain. This project will
reduce excess pressure at certain areas and allow interconnection
of the system for improved system flow.
■ Reserve for Initiation of a Major Project to Develop a New Long $3,500,000
Term Water Supply.
■ Property Purchases. Purchase of two properties on Bull Mountain $350,000
that have been identified for the construction of reservoirs.
APPENDICES
■ Appendix A: Street System Program
■ Appendix B: Park System Program
■ Appendix C: Sanitary Sewer System Program
■ Appendix D: Storm Drainage System Program
■ Appendix E: General Fund Projects
■ Appendix F: Water System Program
■ Appendix G: 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program
■ Appendix H: Capital Improvement Program Overview dated March 2, 2000
c: William A. Monahan, City Manager
Craig Prosser, Finance Director
Ed Wegner, Public Works Director
Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director
Vannie T. Nguyen, CIP Division Manager
Mike Miller, Utility Manager
I:\ENG\GUS\2000-01 CIP\2000-01 Capital Improvement Program- With Revisions
Memorandum to City Council
FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program
Page 13 of 13
f
-RAM
STREET S1rS~'EM ppOG
oand Federal Funding
County Funds Undcrgr ST1P
CDBG Funding Utili
TIF GAS TAX
PROJECT
$65,000
Committed Projects $12,000
and Right-of-Way)
79th Avenue (I System Plan Update Study
Transportation Sy ht-of--Way for Phases 1
$1,600,000
Gaarde Street (Design & Rug
and 2, Construction of Phase 1) Widening
Street Reconstruction and $350,000
Burnnaun Ac uisition) $265,000
()esign and Right-of-Way q
Walnut Street/Tiedeman Avenue Realignment $17,000
Total committed projects $2,215,000
$77,000
Fy 2000-01 $2,215,000
Committed projects $220,000
West of 72nd Avenue) $120,000
TIF Transit Reserve ansion
Dartmouth Street xpan ton Squa1e Drive to $270,08'7
Greenburg'Road (Washing for preliminary
Tiedeman Avenue) - Funding through the Oregon STIP. Th 00 The $3 total
total $35,000
engineering for the $301,0
provides the local matching $295,000
project cost. $461,500
TIF Contingency $15,000 $124 004
TIF Operating Reserve $30,000
000
Main street
et Imp rov Crossing (East Side) $60$150,,000
Lincoln Street Light' $30,000
Embedded Crosswalk
Maintenance Program $32,000
Pavement Major $150,000
Traffic Calming Program $20,000
Kable Street Sidewalk
Undergrounding of electrical and other utilities on
the MSTIP 3 Project at Walnut and 121st Avenue Page A-t
al W ork at Kable Street
Electric
Underground
APPENDIX
py 2000-01 Ci p 2 OD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Revised June
STREET SYSTEM PROGRAM
PRaJECT TIF GAS TAX CDBG Funding County Funds Underground Federsl Funding
Utility STIP
County Roadway Maintenance Projects $112,000
Underground Utility Contingency $20,000
Underground Utility Reserve $287,392
Totals for FY 2000-01 $3,346,500 $394,000 $120,000 $112,000 $477,392 $270,087
FY 2001-02
TIF Transit Reserve $325,000
TIF Reserve for Projects $1,700,000
Tigard Street Bridge Replacement (Design) $80,000
Pavement Major Maintenance Program $210,000
Pedestrian Improvements $50,000
Traffic Calming Program $30,000
County Roadway Maintenance Projects $50,000
Gas Tax Contingency $30,000
Underground Utility Reserve for Future Projects $370,000
Totals for FY 2000-01 $2,025,000 $400,000 $370,000
FY 2002-03
TIF Transit Reserve $430,000
TIF Reserve for Projects $2,400,000
Traffic Studies $30,000
Pedestrian Improvements $50,000
Pavement Major Maintenance Program $260,000
Traffic Calming Program $30,000
County Roadway Maintenance Projects $50,000
Gas Tax Contingency $30,000
Underground Utility Reserve for Future Projects $450,000
Totals for FY 2002-03 $2,830,000 $400,000 $450,000
FY 2000-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Revised June 1:, 2000 APPENDIX A Page A-2
fill
u, R
Y ~,1,K1Y ~
Gll,li
LE ' gROGV onna Federal Fnndin
TAT ~~STT~. Fnnas vnaergr STIF
CountYli
CDI G Fnndrn~
GAS TP'X'
TIF
!!03tclf
$530,000 50,000
Fy 2003-04 `53,000,000 $50 000
Resefve $290,p00 ,
T1F Transit ects $30>0p0 5530,000
T1F Reserve for Proj $530 000
anlmprovements a grogram 530,000
Pedesm or Maintenanc
pavement a
M) program ects
aiming Proj
Traff~e C Maintenance $400,000
unty RoadwaYencY ReServ
Co Conting
Gas Tax e for Future FY 2003.04 $3,530,000
Underground Utility Totals for
$620,000 0
2004-05 $3,500,000 $50,00 $50'000
eserve $290,000
T1F Transit R $30,000 $610,000
TiF Reserve for Projects
$610,000
$30,000
pedestrian Improve2aements lits nce program
paver=1entMaj°T
ming Program Ge projects
Traffic Cai Maintenan $400,000
County Roadway envy re Projects $4,120,000
as'fayro ndUtility ReserveT°otats for FY 2Q04-05
page A-3
X,P,ps MAY,
p1TA1 tMpROV6ME~T pRO0,04
gy 2000-01 CA 2000
Revised 31111 15,
TVIA g~®~I~'~ d ~~deralFa~am~
SYS Funds Undergroun STIP
CDBG Feuding CouutY jjtili
GAS TAX
T
C-pp-O!cr
$7oa,oaa
Fy 2005-06 $4,000,004 $30,000
rve $50,000
TV Transit Rese ro ects $260,000
TIF Reserve for P j $30,pp0 $50,000 $690'000
Traffic Studies Ira rovements program $30,000 $690,000
pedest en Ma or Maintenance
Pavem ingvrogram
Gaf f C01111111 ency Projects $400,000
Ta,
Mainteaanc' uture Projects $4,100,000
County R°adway Reserve for F Fy 2005-06
Under ound lJoity Totals for
$710,000
Fy ,00b-07 $4,500,000 $30,004
eserve $60,000
T1F Transit R ro ects $250,000 $50,000
TIF Reserve for P ] $30000
Studies $770,0p0
Traffic dies rovernents $770,000
pedestri 'anor Maintenance Program $30,000
pavement aM j program ects
Traffic Calming Maintenance proj $400,000
county Road to encY Projects $5,270,000
Gas Tax Coming Reserve for Future 2006-01
UndergroundUtil~ty Totals for FY
Page A-4
Ap1,EN~IX ~
I,,,OVEIMSN'I PROGOM 0000 wwow~
~ 00.01 CAPITAL
FY YO 15, 2000
Revised June
FARKS SYS FEM PROGRAM •ons Total
Tree Fund Danatt
Greenspaces General Fund Park Levy
Park SDC
PROJECT $1,142,000
$65,000 $220,000 $2,003 FY 2000-01 $6,896
$857,000
ion (Phase 1) $2,003 $30,000
Cook Park Expan $5,000
Summerlake Master Plan $6,896 $30,000 $190,000
SDC Study $167,311
Greenspace Land Acquisition $5,000
Trail Route Study $190,000 $167,311 $42,500
MainlAsh Trail $37,000
TigardlTiedeman Trail $5,500 $150,000
TiedemardWoodard Park Trail* $150,000
Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Mitigation $140,971
Bonita Park*
Cache Creek Park Addition** $220,000 $37,000 $150,000 $1,876,681
Bond Street Park* 71 $65,000
Total Project Costs $1,2012018?0 $2025811
Contingency
* These projects are i contention
for funding through grants.
grants do materialize during Y
2000-01, any matching funds
required may be taken from the
amount set aside for contingency.
This project may be funded
through a grant with matching
funds in the amount of $150,000
provided through donation by the
Trust for Public Lands.
Note: FY 2001-07 projects are not
shown because
s SDC fee the uncertainty Of
structure and the
the Park uired page B-1
as yet undetermined costs anion
for the full Cook Park EXp XppENDIX B
FY 2000-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
p~.OGRATA
g~ SMER SSeveer Fund
Sanitary
PROJECT $150,000
$75,000
ects $25,000
Committed Prof
. I Street to Burnham road $250,000
Commerc
Bonita Road (at Mrlton P1ari Studies itted Projects
Sanitary Sewer Facility Total Coma'
$250,000
$40,000
FY 2000-01 $11000,000
ects $100,000
Committed Prof or Maintenance $1,390,000
Sanitary Sewer M ercial Area Seger Extensions $265,750
Neighborhood and Comm Total for F`~ 2000-01 CIP $4,995,500
Contingency $6,651,250
Operating Reserve projects Total
Sanitary Sefver Fund
Reserve for Future Prof
$40,000
$1,000,000
FY 2001-02 $4,721,250
Sewer Major Maintenance $5,761,250
R ions
Sanitary mercial Area Sewer Extens
Neighborhood and Coects Totals for FY 2001-02
eserve for Future Project'
$40,000
$l,ooa,ooa .
FY 2002-03 $4,281,250
Maio' Mac'alintenance $5,321,250
Sanitary Sewer M ea Sewer Extensions
Neighborhood and ComTotals for FY 2002-03
Reserve for Future Projects
Page C-t
APPENDIX C
FY 2000.01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SANITARY SEVER SYSTEM ]PROGRAM
Sanitary Sewer Fund
=PROJECT
FY 2003-04 $40,000
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $1,000,000
Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $3,941,250
$4,981,250
Reserve for Future Projects Totals for FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05 $40,000
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $500,000
250
Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $$5 01, $4,741,250
Reserve for Future Projects Totals for FY 2004-05
FY 2005-06 $40,000
$300,000
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance 250
Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $$300 , $5,051,250
Reserve for Future Projects Totals for FY 2005-06
FY 2006-07 $40,000
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $200,000
Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $5,321,250
$5,561,250
Reserve for Future Projects Totals for FY 2006-07
Page C-2
APPENDIX C
FY 2000-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
MEN=
~1`V~ )Cp,OGR~'~~-
~ AIl~~ ~ SVST Fund
~O D Water Quality
Storm Sewer Farad
$20,000
ects $40,000 $100,000
Committed Prof $260,000
Court Storm Drama e g Protect $360,044
118th erosion Control $60~p00
l 18th Court eatment at 121st Avenue
tOT
Washington Square Pre a Re,
ation tted Projects
Summer Creek'~Weiland Total Cowin,
360,000
$60,000
$80,000
2000-01 $45,000 $350,000
Projects Program
Committed e Major Maintenance venue)
Drive to 100th A $160,000
Storn~ Drainag iew
et (Hoodv $10,000
gable Stre rovements eats
Summer Lake Imp Drainage lmprovem Creek
Walnun~ M,t fat°on - riedernar' Avenue at panno $14,000 $75,000
W etla Summer Lake Square plan $95,000
and 130th Avenue at Washington $40,000
alysis - $211,250
Storm Drainage An $399,000 $36,750
Implementation study li 2000-41 CIP
nvy Total for F $1,149,004
Continge $399,000
Operating Reserve rolects Total Fund
Reserve for Future P
page D-1
L IMPRGV ,MF-NT pRGGRAI`'i
1 CAPITA
Fy 2000 0 2000
RevisedMaY 11,
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PROGRAM
PROJECT Storm Sewer Fund Water Quality Fund
FY 2001-02
Reserve for USA Master Plan $354,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects $60,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $40,000
Totals for FY 2001-02 $100,000 $354,000
FY 2002-03
Reserve for USA Master Plan $394,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects $120,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $40,000
Totals for FY 2002-03 $160,000 $394,000
FY 2003-04
Reserve for USA Master Plan $434,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects $180,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $40,000
Totals for FY 2003-04 $220,000 $434,000
FY 2004-5
Reserve for USA Master Play; $474,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects $240,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $40,000
Totals for FY 2004-05 $280,000 $474,000
FY 2000-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Revised May 11, 2000 APPENDIX D Page D-2
P~OGVA
Water uaQlitYFund
S,fO
und
Storm Sewer F
~R4gECT $514,000
,FY 2005-06 $ $40;000 $514,000
e for USA Master Plan lan Projects $340,000
Reserve for public Facility _06
Resew e Major Nla1ntenaTotals for FY 2005
Storm Dramag $554,000
FY 2006-01 $360,000 $554,000
$40.000
e for USA Master Plan lan projects $400,000
Reserve for Public Fa Maicilityntenance FY 2006-07
Resew e Major
Storm Drainag Totals for
Page D-3
A~~ENVIx ~
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Fy 2000 01 2000
Revised May 11,
GENERAL FUND PROGRAM
PROJECT General Fund Facility Fund Total Project Cost
FY 2000-01
City Hall Parking Lot Lights $6,500 $6,500
Roof Replacement (Niche Building) $13,000 $13,000
HVAC Replacement (Police Building) $125,000 $125,000
New Library (Programming, Design and Site Selection) $200,000 $200,000
Contingency $30,000 $50,000 $80,000
Total for FY 2000-01 CIP $174,500 $250,000 $424,500
Operating Reserve $230,000 $230,000 °
Reserve for Future Projects $425,000 $425,000
Total Fund $905,000 $905,000
FY 2001-02
New Library (Design and Land Acquisition) $1,000,000
FY 2002-03
New Library ( Construction) $6,200,000
F2003-04
Renovation of City Hail and Old Library Buildings $825,000
FY 2004-07
Projects will be determined based on needs during each
fiscal year.
FY 2000-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPENDIX Page E-1
maim
39 ~_www SYSTPR0k5V4LA1M - Cost
~M
W ALTER Total project
Water CtP
Water SDC
Water Fund
PROJECT
FY 200Q-Ol
W Walnut street between SW
Naterline Replacement (S venue at the New Gaarde
128th Avenue and SW 132nd A $305,520
Replace 1,000 feet of 12-inch and 1, 000 feet o 520
Extension)- with 24-inch ductile iron water
$229,000 $77
6-inch cast iron water main unction with the Gaarde Street $60,000
main. This project is in conj
Extension Project.
cement (SW Lincoln Street from S ,000
of
Waterline Repla ~V 91st Avenue). Replace 800 feet $60
Greenburg Road to S
-inch cast iron water math with 6-inch ductile iron ptpe• $150,000
6 Valve) Installation at SW
pRV (Pressure Reducing V station and associated
Rose Vista and SW $150,000
GaardeStreet. Installation. Of a P
near the intersection of S
piping
Gaarde Street. Project with the $25,000
(Aquifer Storage and Recovery) of a joint $25,000
ASR Assessment of the feasibility
City of Beaverton. Scholls and Loon Drive. Ste' $319,200
ASR project near SW SW Burnham Street from
Waterline Installatioo Street). Installation of $319,200
I1a11 Blvd to SW Main
approximately 2,100 feet of 16-inch dement Piron r 'pct water main
03
as part of the Burnham Street imp $376,280
SW Walnut Street and SW 121st
lacement ( 12-inch and 6-inch cast $291,280
Naterline Rep $85,000
Avenue). Replacem-nt of existing
iron water mains -inch and 1,500 feet o
with 900 feet of 24
iron water mains.
12-inch ductile
Page F-1
APPENDIX F
MPROVEMENT PROGRAM logo
FY 2000-01 CAPITAL I
f
tal project cost
OG~
YST~ pR C1P To
Water
water gDC
Water Ruud
$15z,oaa
YRO~CT
Site
at Mentor Re$eTvoir 5152,000
Main ane)• Installation
Transmission Sunrise L water to the
ervoir Site to Sw to convey S40XJJ
~e"~
~Menior Res ission main
new 16-inch transm e5ervoir location.
of a ne foot elevation r reducing
proposed 550- etion of a pressure This $3,500,000
pRV . cons t . on Bull Mountain. and allow $40,000
Bull Mountain vision areas a 53,500,OOa
within a new subdi at Certain flow •
Station eXCess pressure
ect will r s stem
proj for improved y 0 000
ction ect to Develop a S35
interconne. of the system
M
Initiation of a ajor prof 55,279,000
Reserve f°r Water Supply- roperties on Bull
Term 350,000 $3,500,000
ire,% Long Purchase of f two p or the c
proper onstruction Of '5 $840}000
identified
property Purchases.
that have been $939,000 $615,000
Mountain for FV 2000-01 $194,000
reservoirs. Totals
S111,001)
$15,000
$25,000
550,000
py 2001-02 $1,186,000
Menlor Pump Station
Re$eNoir #1 Supply Line 150th Avenu e,
Waterline Installation (lea Main Overstzing
West Bull Mountain
ASR Study E Totals for FY 2001-02
valuation
Telemetry System
page F-2
~T PROGRAI`4
Fy 2000-01 CAPITAL IMPRpVEME
WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM
PROJECT Water Fund Water SDC Water CIP Total Project Cost
FY 2002-03
Reservoir Evaluation Program $130,000
Waterline Installation (150th Avenue) $171,000
West Bull Mountain Area Main Oversizing $75,000
Water Main Replacements $75,000
Telemetry System Improvements $125,000
Totals for FY 2002-03 $576,000
FY 2003-04
550-Foot Reservoir #1 $1,400,000
24-inch Walnut Street Supply Main $456,000
West Bull Mountain Area Main Oversizing $75,000
Water Main Replacements $75,000
Totals for FY 2003-04 $2,006,000
FY 2004-05
550-Foot Reservoir #1 $1,400,000
24-inch Walnut Street Supply Main $456,000
West Bull Mountain Area Main Oversizing $75,000
Water Main Replacements $75,000
Totals for FY 2004-05 $2,006,000
FY 2005-06
Transfer Pump Station $1,050,000
24-inch Walnut Street Supply Main $456,000
550-Foot Reservoir # 2 Supply Line $380,000
Various Waterline Oversizing Projects $75,000
Water Main Replacements $75,000
Totals for FY 2005-06 $2,036,000
FY 2000-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPENDIX F Page F-3
-pp OGRA a
sVs'r~ Project Cost
water CIP Totat J
Water SDC
W ater Fund
$1,450,000
pp.OJECT $304,404
228000
$75,000
Vy 2006-07 $75,000
Transfer Pump Station $1,132,000
l6 line
-inch Barrows Road Water
ne
p~eservoir #2 Supply Li projects
waterline Oversizing
Various 2006-07
Water Main Replacements Totals for F1'
Page FA
APPENDIX F
T PROGRAM
FY 2000_01 CAPITAL IMPROVENIPN
FY 2000-01
Capital hnprovement Program
APPENDLX G
1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program
CITY OF TICARD
Engineering Department
Shaping A Better Community
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGA,RD
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard, OR 97223
Phone (503) 6394171
Fax (503) 624-0752
TO: City Council ~ .
FROM: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: June 8, 1999
SUBJECT: FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program
This document presents the proposed FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for review
and approval by City Council. The FY 1999-2000 CIP was presented to the Planning Commission on
May 17, 1999 for review and recommendation to City Council. The Planning Commission approveJ
the FY 1999-2000 CIP as submitted with minor modifications and corrections as recommended by the
City Engineer. This document reflects those modifications and corrections.
Background
The long-term Capital Improvement Program, initially adopted by the City Council on August 23,
1994, identified projects for the 1994-95 CIP Program and proposed a list of projects for the next 6-
year period. The Capital Improvement Program includes improvements to the streets, storm drainage,
sanitary sewer, water and parks systems. The Engineering Department manages the street, storm
drainage, and sanitary sewer C1P's. The Public Works Department manages the Water System CIP,
while the Parks CIP is managed jointly by the Planning and Engineering Departments.
The Capital Improvement Program is updated each year, and is reviewed and approved by the City
Council. The CIP fomulation is separate from the yearly operating budget process, but is approved on
the same fiscal year basis as that budget. While the program lists projects for subsequent fiscal years,
the projects shown arc tentative and arc subject to change during the formulation process for each
specific budget year. The ('IP, through the adoption process, therefore establishes the budget for cacti
fiscal year and serves as a planning document to guide the infrastructure improvements over the
following 6 years. During each budget year's update, the revenue estimates arc adjusted, the project
APPE'NDIX G
cost estimates are reviewed, and the program and project priorities are re-evaluated based on changes
in City plans, citizen input, and additional data which may become available. The 1996-97 CIP listed a
6-year program; the 1997-98 CIP returned to the 7-year period originally established in 1994. The
1999-2000 CIP continues with the 7-year program projections.
Process
The Capital Improvement Program update process begins with citizen involvement through the Citizen
Involvement Teams. An overview of the CIP process is presented to the CIT's, usually early in the
calendar year so that the entire process can be completed and the annual CIP budget submitted to and
approved by City Council prior to the beginning of the next fiscal year (July 1). This overview was
presented during the March CIT meeting this year. The CIT meeting in April provided the CIT
members with the opportunity to provide input into the process and to nominate projects for evaluation
and possible inclusion into the program.
The Planning Commission review typically provides another opportunity for public continent on the
proposed plan. After review by the Planning Commission, the plan with subsequent modifications, if
any, is submitted, with Commission recommendation, to the City Council for review and approval.
Council may make additional modifications to the plan during its review and approval process. The
approved plan would be the approved Capital Improvement Program for the next fiscal year.
The following summarizes the program. update for the 1999-2000 budget year. It is important to note
that each funding source has restrictions on the types of projects that can be constructed. Projects
cannot be moved from one funding source to another. Committed projects are those projects that have
been previously approved for 1998-99 funding, but have not been completed as of June 30, 1999. The
specific lists of projects are contained in the appendices associated with each of the program areas.
FY 1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
STREET SYSTEM PROGRAM
The following are the street projects proposed for FY 1999-2000. A complete listing of the projects,
including the full 7-year program, is attached as Appendix A.
Recommended Street (Gas Tax) Projects
The gas tax revenue can be used for upgrading the collector and local streets within Tigard, without
restriction. However, this revenue is limited and is not sufficient to fund all the street improvement
'D needs of the City. The total State Gas Tax amount shown for the 1999-2000 fiscal year is based on
current budgetary projections. Although there were numerous major street projects initiated and
i completed during FY 1998-99, there are several projects that require funding to be carried over into
q FY 1999-2000.
~ t
The following is a brief description of the projects recommended for Gas Tax Funding next year:
Committed Projects: These arc projects that have been already
committed but not completcd at the end of FY 1998-99.
Memorandum to City Council
1999.2000 Capital Improvement Program
Page 2 of 13
11~~ Pill! ill
• Pedestrian Improvements (Grant Avenue): This project will provide a $47,000
pedestrian path along Grant Avenue connecting the existing walkway along
Park Street with School Street and providing pedestrian access to Charles F.
Tigard Elementary School. Design was completed in FY 1998-99 and
construction will begin in July this year.
• 79th Avenue (Design and Right-of-Way): This project has been awarded to an $80,000
engineering consultant to design the improvements of 791h Avenue from
Durham Road to Bonita Road. The final design will be completed by the end
of 1999.
• Transportation System Plan Update Study: The funding under this project is $25,000
for the transportation consultant contract to complete the TSP Update study.
The consultant has basically completed the "Motor Vehicle" portion of the
contract. The remaining work includes analysis of other transportation
modes, development and participation in the public involvement process,
preparation of the draft TSP, public hearings on the draft TSP, and finally
adoption into the City's comprehensive plan.
• New Projects:
• Mapleleaf Street and 71St Avenue (from 72nd Avenue to Oak Street): This $50,000
project widens the existing pavement on 71 st Avenue and Mapleleaf Street to
the standard width of a local street. This amount provides funding for right-
of-way acquisition and design of the improvements. Construction will be
programmed for next fiscal year's budget.
• Traffic Circulation and Feasibility Study: This project is to perform a traffic $20,000
study in the area of Tigard covering Canterbury Lane, Murdock Street, 109th
Avenue, Royalty Parkway, Naeve Street, and areas east towards connections
with 97`h Avenue and Sattler Street. The study is intended determine which
street and sidewalk connections make sense for improvements to provide
balanced transportation and pedestrian circulation within this area.
• Embedded Crosswalk Lights (Pilot Project): This provides funding for $30,000
installation of embedded crosswalk lights at two or more locations. Potential
sites for the pilot project are the following intersections: Grant Avenue and
Walnut Street, 12151 Avenue and Katherine Street and 121" Avenue, and
Springwood Drive.
• Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PMMP) - This is a program of $233,000
corrective and preventive maintenance on all paved streets in Tigard. It
addresses those streets that can still benefit from corrective or preventative
action. Last year's program expended $415,000 from the $500,000 PMMP
budget. Streets proposed to receive overlays during the 1999-2000 fiscal year
include l3onita Road (721"1 Avenue to the City Limits), Scoffins Street (Main
Street to Ash Avenue), McKenzie Street (cast of 99W), Meadow Street (at
Memorandum to City Council
1999-2000 Capital Improvement Phogram
Page 3 of 13
• I
Tiedeman Avenue) and 107`h Avenue (Cook Lane to Park Street). Scoffins
Street may need reconstruction to correct problems with the street crown and
provide proper drainage. This will be determined during the design phase of
the PMMP package.
• The Traffic Calming Program - This program provides funding for traffic $60,000
calming measures Citywide. Much of the funding will be used to place speed
humps on streets that have clearly demonstrated the need for installation of
these traffic-calming devices. However, other traffic calming measures may
be installed for streets where speed humps are not appropriate. The program
for FY 1999-2000 includes $60,000 for City-funded projects. Up to $15,000
of this amount can be used on a 50-50 cost sharing basis with residents for
placement of speed humps in streets that do not make this year's list. This
year's program includes speed humps for 135`t' Avenue (south of Walnut
Street), Grant Avenue (Walnut Street to Tigard Street), Summerfield Drive
(Durham Road to 98`I' Avenue), Benchview Terrace (Bull Mountain Road to
Mistletoe Drive), North Dakota Street (south of Anton Drive) and Canterbury
Lane (103rd Avenue to 106'h Avenue).
Recommended TIF (Traffic Impact Fee) Projects
TIF Funding can be used only for highway and transit capital improvements that provide additional
capacity to major transportation systems. This funding is limited to major collector and arterial streets,
and 50% must be spent on arterial streets. A major portion of these funds was being held in reserve
until our transportation planning is completed. The Transportation System Update Plan Study has
made significant progress with the "motor vehicle" segment nearing completion. The projects
proposed in the FY 1999-2000 CIP are high priority projects in the Transportation Plan. However,
there will not be sufficient funding in the TIF to complete all the projects that are envisioned over the
next five to 10 years. A Transportation Bond Task Force has been formed to examine potential on
projects with the intention of placing a transportation bond issue on the year 2000 election ballot. That
proposed transportation bond, if approved by the voters, would provide a major amount of the funding
for transportation-related improvements Citywide. In the meantime, the TIF will be utilized to design
some of the potential bond projects and to reconstruct and expand portions of the major collectors
within the City.
The TIF-funded projects proposed for the next CIP Budget Year are as follows:
o Committed Projects:
U Gaarde Street (Design and right-of-way): This project is the design of Gaarde $650,000
Street from Highway 99W to 121St Avenue, and from the Quail Hollow-West
subdivision to its intersection with Walnut Street. The funding of $650,000 is
provided to design the projects and begin the right-of-way acquisition
necessary for construction implementation.
Bonita Road G-om the Railroad "Tracks to the Fanno Creek: $800,000 was $386,000
Funded in l-Y 1997-98. $414,000 was expended for Phases I and 2, which
Memorandum to City Council
1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program
Page 4 of 13
included underground utilities and reconstruction of the railroad crossings.
Phase 3 of this project will include street widening. Necessary right-of--way
and easements required for the widening have been obtained. Construction
began in early June on this project.
• Walnut Street/Tiedeman Avenue Intersection Realignment and Signalization $1,300,000
(Construction): The design of this project was completed in FY 1998-99.
Project construction is expected to begin July 1999 and is projected for
completion by September 2000.
• Burnham Street Reconstruction and Widening (Design and Right-of-Way): $300,000
This project is the design of Burnham Street for development to ultimate
width from Main Street to Hall Boulevard. The project design would identify
the right-of-way required and begin the acquisition process. Additional
funding that may be needed for right-of-way acquisition and construction of
the project would be programmed either in future budgets, or in a
transportation bond issue.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Project: $190,000
Lincoln Street, between Greenburg Road and Commercial Street, has been
approved for CDBG funding effective July 1, 1999. The scope of this project is to
construct half-street improvements, which include construction of sidewaltcs, curbs
and streetlights.
The total project cost is $190,000 with $166,800 in CDBG funding and $23,200 in
City funding and in-kind contribution.
69th Avenue Local Improvement District Project: $1,600,000
This project is the construction of 691h Avenue between Hampton Street and
Dartmouth Street to its ultimate section in compliance with the Tigard Triangle
Design Standards. The LID was initiated and formed by the City at the request of
Specht Development, Inc. The project has been designed and bid award has been
made for construction of the improvements. Land acquisition for the extension of
Beveland Street from 68`h Avenue to 70th Avenue is included in this project.
The total LID cost is estimated at $1,600,000. This amount is approximate and
includes all costs involved in the LID. The actual costs could well be less than this
amount, and will be compiled after the improvements are completed and accepted
by the City.
PARKS SYSTEM PROGRAM
Introduction
This initial draft of the parks component of the City C11' provides a schedule for addressing local park
and open space needs over the next seven years. Following public review and adoption, the projects
Memorandum to City Council
1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program
Page 5 of 13
listed for the first year of the park CIP will be incorporated into the City's 1999-2000 budget process.
Although the general intention is to include the projects for each following year into the next year's
budget process, projects listed for fiscal years 2000-2001 to 2006-2007 are regarded as a tentative list.
The scheduling of these projects is subject to change based on the changing needs of the community
and changes in available funding for financing park capital improvements.
The need for flexibility in making modifications to the seven-year plan, as the need arises, is especially
important with regard to potential land acquisitions. Land acquisition opportunities may present
themselves prior to their identification in the CIP. Flexibility is needed to ensurd that if properties
considered critical to the park system come on the market, the City has the ability to evaluate the
situation and move in a timely manner, if appropriate. In order to maximize city park improvement
dollars, the same flexibility is needed with regard to potential grant funding and partnership
opportunities, which may not follow the timeline or be identified in the seven-year plan.
Park and Open Space Master Plan
The ten-year "Park and Open Space Master Plan" adopted March 1999 was used as a framework in
developing the parks CIP. However, the present CIP includes only a portion of the improvement
projects recommended for funding in the master plan. This is primarily because the master plan
recommendations assumed a much higher level of funding than presently exists. As a financial
planning tool, the present CEP takes a conservative approach and reflects funding levels for which there
is some level of confidence. Should new funding be realized, it will be possible to accelerate the
schedule of capital improvements and to include additional projects recommended in the park and open
space master plan.
Woodard Park Expansion Plan
The same month the parks master plan was adopted, the city adopted a site and management plan,
developed with neighborhood involvement, for Woodard Park and an abutting a seven-acre property
purchased with Metro regional Greenspace funds. Metro approval of this plan is pending. Three
projects included in the present CIP relate to the expansion area and are contingent on Metro granting
to Tigard the authority to manage the seven-acre property in accordance with the city's adopted site
plan.
Funding Sources
Revenue sources for the 1999-2007 parks CIP include Park System Development Charges (SDCs),
+ local share Greenspaces bond measure funds, other funds, and grants. The park SDC is the city's most
i consistent funding source for parks. It is a charge imposed on new development in order to recoup
sonic portion of the cost of providing new residents and employees with park facilities. The draft CIP
a assumes the park system development charge will be revised upward during 1999. City Council has
indicated an intention of increasing the fee structure and, if allowed by Washington County, of
expanding the SDC to new development in the Urban Services Area. Local share is the portion of the
3 regional Greenspaces bond measure to be passed through to local park providers for neighborhood and
community scale Grcenspace projects. Thesc funds can be spent only on natural area acquisition and
trail related projects. The inter-govcnurrcntal agreement with Metro for the expenditure of these funds
expires 12/31/99. Other funds include an annual contribution of $15,000 from the Atfalati Recreation
District toward the cost of acquiring land and improving Cook Park. Grant funds include a pending
Memorandum to City Council
1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program
Page 6 of 13
transportation department grant application (Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge) and a potential
Community Development Block Grant proposal (Bonita Park). It is important to emphasize that these
grant programs are competitive and there is no guarantee that Tigard's project proposals will be picked
for funding.
Project Descriptions
The list of first year, or FY 1999-2000, projects include "Committed" and "New" projects.
"Committed" projects are projects that were funded last year, but were not anticipated to be completed
as of July 1, 1999. The funding shown for these projects are the amounts needed to complete the
project. "New" projects are projects that will be funded for the first time. Attached as Exhibit B is the
Parks component of the City's seven-year CIP plan.
• Committed Projects
1 & 12. Cook Park Expansion:
Construct bio-Swale, east restrooms, parking lot, and install utilities.
2. Woodard Park Play Structure:
Replace older play structure with new structure designed for younger children.
3. Woodard Park Improvements:
Install new restroom or other improvements as called for in master plan.
4. Fanno Creek Park Lighting:
Install overhead lighting along pedestrian trails.
5. Tigard St./Fowler School Trial:
Construct 1,800-foot segment of Fanno Creek trail with bridge over Fanno Creek.
6. Fowler School/Woodard Park Trail:
Install 1,526 foot segment of Fanno Creek trail
7. Woodard Park/Grant Avenue Trail:
Acquire land and construct 1,100-foot trail segment, including bridge over Fanno Creek.
8. Grant Avenue/Main Street Trail:
Obtain right-of-way and install 650 feet of new trail connecting to existing trail at Morland
Plumbing. Replace existing path located under Pacific Highway.
9. Main Street/Ash Street Trail:
Install boardwalk, bridge, and paved path between Main and existing Fanno Creek trail
segment.
10. Grecnspaces Acquisitions:
Purchase natural area along l-anno Creek by 12/99 with remaining Grcenspaces local share
funds.
Memorandum to City Council
1999.2000 Capital Improvement Program
Page 7 of 13
11. Bottom Barriers - Summer Lake:
Provide bottom barriers for weed suppression in Summer Lake at those areas that cannot be
reached by the aquatic harvester.
O New Projects
13. ADA Transition Plan:
Develop system-wide plan to meet federal American with Disability Act access standards.
14. Fenced Dog Park:
Locate suitable site for fenced dog park and address on-going maintenance requirements
through dog owner friends group.
15, 20, 27, 29, & 33. Upgrade Playgrounds:
Replacement and retrofit all play structures as needed to improve safety.
16. Cache Creek Park Master Plan:
Hire consultant to develop site plan for natural area park with public involvement.
17. Realign trail at N. Dakota Street:
Realign Fanno Creek trail at N. Dakota St. to connect opposite southerly segment.
18 Cook Park/851h Avenue Trail:
Extend multi-use trail from the end of 85th Ave. to connect with the Cook Park trail system.
19. Cook Park Field Drainage:
Upgrade existing sportsfields at Cook Park.
21. Trail Alignments Study:
Determine the feasibility of and map alignments of proposed trail extensions: Ash
Creek/Fanno, Summer Creek/Fanno, Genesis/Pathfinder, Durham Road/Tualatin River, and
Powerline from Barrows to Tual. River.
22. Walnut/Woodard Park Trail:
Construct segment connecting Pathfinder/Genesis to main stem Fanno Creek Trail.
23. "Albertson" Park Improvements:
Construct priority improvement(s) identified in park master plan now under preparation.
24. Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge:
Construct bridge over Tualatin River using grant funds, if awarded.
25. Bonita Road Park:
Construct neighborhood park financed by grant funds, if awarded.
26. "Canterbury" Park:
In cooperation witli water district, develop neighborhood park on Little Bull Mt. Reservoir site.
Memorandum to City Council
1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program
Page 8 of 13
1111mul NEE
28. Cook Park/RR trail:
Extend Tualatin River trail from Cook Park to railroad tracks.
30. Construct rollerblade/skateboard facility:
Identify site and construct skate park.
31. Renovate Woodard Park:
Develop Woodard Park in accordance with master plan.
32. Hall/Bonita trail
Construct Hall/Bonita Fanno Creek trail segment.
34. Bonita Road/Durham trail:
Obtain right-of-way and complete segment of Fanno Creek trail.
35. Develop nature park:
Implement master plan for Cache Creek Park.
36. Acquire land for Jack Park Expansion:
Acquire 3.4-acre property located between existing park and Walnut Street.
37. Pathfinder/Genesis Trail Extension:
Extend trail from Fairhaven to Gaarde Street.
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PRGGRAM
The sanitary sewer funding has funding sources that are reserved for maintenance repairs to the
existing sanitary sewer system, capacity upgrades as recommended from the USA Master Plan, and for
the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program. A new program was created by City Council in FY
1997-98 to extend sewers into commercial areas. This new program is included in the 1998-99 CIP
budget and is again included in the 1999-2000 CIP budget. The unrestricted portion of the Sanitary
Sewer Fund can be used for repair and maintenance projects Citywide and for extension of the existing
system to unsewered areas. In addition, one of the City Counci-l goals is preparation of a
Comprehensive Public Facility Plan for sewers, both storm and sanitary. Several studies will need to
be performed in FY 1999-2000 to obtain information necessary for preparation of the Sanitary Sewer
Facility Plan. Funding for these studies is included in this budget. The detailed project listing for 1999-
2000 and the full 7-year program is attached as Appendix C.
The projects that are proposed for Sanitary Sewer Funding are as follows:
• Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extension Programs: The $500,000
Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program has been a highly successful program
commencing with its implementation in the 1996-97 CIP budget year. Last
fiscal year's program included two homes on Hillview Street. There arc two
projects that have been designed and are ready for implementation in FY 1999-
2000: 106th & Johnson Street and the Walnut & Tiedeman Intersection.
Memorandum to City (:ouncil
1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program
Page 9 of 13
0 1111M=~J
4
- kr
0 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program: These funds would be used to $40,000
contract out sewer repair projects that are beyond the repair capabilities of the
Public Works Department. This program is expected to be a continuing program
in future years. A proposed sanitary sewer major maintenance project in FY
1999-2000 includes Pinebrook Street (west of Hall Boulevard).
0 Commercial Street to Burnham Road: This project provides funding to upsize $100,000
approximately 1,250 feet of sanitary sewer between Commercial Street and
Burnham Road.
0 Bonita Road (at Milton Court): This project is to replace or relocate $40,000
approximately 250 feet of 8-inch sanitary sewer pipe that crosses Fanno Creek
atMilton Court. The existing pipe has poor grade, severe belly and has required
monthly cleaning for many years.
STORM DRAINAGE SYS'T'EM PROGRAM
The storm drainage funding has the same mix of sources as the sanitary sewer fund. The funding is
generally reserved for currently unknown small projects that come up during the year. Funding from
the new SDC's must be used on projects designated on the USA Master Plan. One of the major
objectives for the Engineering Department during the next fiscal year is the development of a
Comprehensive Public Facility Plan for Storm Drainage, in accordance with a City Council goal. Once
the plan is developed and projects are identified and prioritized, implementation of project design and
construction will be incorporated into the annual CIP budget. The Public Facility Plan projects are
expected to be initiated in FY 1999-2000. Until the Plan is developed and adopted, non-SDC funded
projects selected for incorporation in the CIP budget will be on a case-by-case basis with emphasis on
resolving relatively small-scale, severe drainage problem areas.'
The detailed project listing is attached as Appendix D. The projects currently proposed for CIP Budget
Year 1999-2000 are as follows:
o Committed Projects:
0 118th Court Erosion Control: This is an erosion control project that needs to $50,000
extend the improvements further downstream to alleviate the heavy erosion
on the side slopes and streambed. The initial step would be to initiate a study
of the area along the entire streambed to determine the extent of the erosion
and to provide measures for resolving the problem. The remainder of the
funds would be used to design the project, obtain any necessary permits, and
initiate construction based on the plan developed. Any additional work that
cannot be completed with the funding available would be considered for
inclusion in next fiscal year's program.
• Lincoln Street Drainage Improvements: The drainage system upgrade on 91st $60,000
Avenue, from Grcenburg Road to Lincoln Street, has been included in the
91st improvement project. This project extends the drainage system along
Lincoln Street from 91 st Avenue to Commercial Street. Design and
Mcnwtanduin to City Council
1999-2000 Capital Improvement 11rogiam
Page M of 13
I Jill J;
construction of this project will be combined with the Lincoln Street project
that is funded by CDBG.
• 116th Avenue Drainage Improvements: This project intercepts the existing $75,000
drainage on 115th Avenue and re-routes the storm runoff down 116th
Avenue to an existing creek. The existing system is inadequate, cannot
accommodate the storm runoff during the heavy rains, and frequently
overflows flooding the surrounding homes.
• New Projects:
• Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program: This program addresses minor
storm drainage problems requiring more than normal maintenance effort. $60,000
This year program includes drainage repairs at Katherine Street (at 1215'
Avenue), Ann Court (at 124`h Avenue) and Gaarde Street (at 118`t' Court).
• Pacific Highway and Durham Road: The outfall of the existing drainage $50,000
system at the intersection cannot be located. This project installs
approximately 100 feet of storm pipe and connects to the State system in
Pacific Highway. Completion of this project will eliminate traffic hazards
created by standing water during heavy rains.
• Walnut Terrace (at 69di Avenue): The existing storm lines on this street are $80,000
impossible to maintain due to failing materials and various diameters in the
same run. This project provides funding to replace approximately 800 feet of
storm drain pipe and construct needed catch basins.
• Hoodview Street Drainage: This projects installs an underground drainage $40,000
system on the east portion of Hoodview Street to collect the stonn runoff and
pipe it to the drainage system on Kable Street. The project is intended to
alleviate the extensive amount of sheet flow on the street and to divert year-
round discharge from one or more of the lots to the underground drainage
system.
• Thorn Street (at 82nd Avenue): This project installs 860 feet of storm pipe, $75,000
catch basins, manholes and an outfall structure. The funding will also be used
to acquire a pennanent drainage easement. The total project cost is $75,000
with $65,600 in CDBG funding and $9,400 in City funding.
r
WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM
I
The Water System projects and funding are decided by Maintenance Services in the Public Works
Department, with the approval of the Intergovernmental Water Board. The list of water system projects
for the upcoming fiscal year, and for the next six years afterwards, is attached as Appendix E.
The following are the Water System Projects for FY 1999-2000.
I
• Replace 460 feet of 10-inch cast iron water main with 12-inch ductile iron; $90,000
Sid 460 feet of 8-inch cast iron water main with 8-inch ductile iron; and 175 feet
Memorandum to City Council
1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program
Page I I of 13 f
L
of 6-inch cast iron water main with 8-inch ductile iron on SW Tiedeman
Avenue at SW Walnut Street. This project is part of the
Tiedeman/Fonner/Walnut intersection improvement project.
0 Install 3,400 feet of 24-inch transmission main on SW Beef Bend Road from $750,000
S W 131 st Avenue to S W King Arthur. This is to be completed during the
County's project that will be Lunded by MSTIP 3. The County project
consists of widening Beef Bend Road from two lanes to three, construction
of retaining walls, sidewalks, storm drainage improvements, and vertical and
horizontal realignment. The County postponed this project during 1997 due
to Measure 47.
e Replace 800 feet of 6-inch cast iron water main with 6-inch ductile pipe on $60,000
SW Lincoln Street from SW Greenburg Road to SW 91st Avenue. This is an
on-going program of replacing old cast iron water mains with ductile iron
pipe in conjunction with the City's street improvement program.
0 Construction of pressure reducing stations within the Bull Mountain system. $40,000
The pressure reducing stations are constructed as needed, when new
subdivisions come on-line. On Bull Mountain, properties below an elevation
of 580 feet are serviced from the 713-foot service zone. At an elevation of
430 feet, the water pressure becomes excessive and the operating (working)
pressure must be reduced. Depending upon timing, we have identified two
proposed subdivisions (Autumn Hill and Quail Hollow West) that would .
require pressure-reducing facilities.
0 Install 2,700 feet of 12-inch distribution main on SW 150th Avenue from $260,000
Bull Mountain Road to Hawks Ridge (Bull Mountain system).
0 Install 1,450 feet of 12-inch transmission main on SW North Dakota between $140,000
115th and 121st Avenue. This will complete a 12-inch loop to SW Sc_holls
Ferry Road.
APPENDICES
The appendices with the detailed project listings and other relevant documents are. attached as follows:
j 0 Appendix A: Street System Program
i
0 Appendix B: Parks System Program
e Appendix C: Sanitary Sewer System Program
3
a 0 Appendix D: Storm Drainage System Program
0 Appendix 1: Water System Program
Memorandum to City council
1999-2000 Capital Improvement 1'rogram
Page 12 of 13
11 1 1,1111:1111 9
• Appendix F: 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program
• Appendix G: Pavement Corrective and Preventative Maintenance Backlog
• Appendix H: Capital Improvement Program Overview dated March 4, 1999
• Appendix I: Proposed PMMP Projects -FY 1999-2000
Appendix J: CIP Funding Projections from Director of Finance dated March 29, 1999
c: William A. Monahan, City Manager
Ed Wegner, Public Works Director
Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director
Cyndi Turner, Financial Operations Manager
Vannie T. Nguyen, CIP Division Manager
lAENG\GUS\1999.2000 CIP\1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program to City Council
Memorandum to Uily Council
1999-2000 <'apual Improvement Program
Page 13 of 13
I~ f F.
` n G R G
S'Y O'I'L
$41,000
$84,000
C
::Z~
fitted projects $25,000
Comm ents Grant Avenue)
rpvem Aht_of_W aY)
Pedestrian Im (Design plan
andRUpdate sway $b50,OQ0 g $166,800 CD'BG)
i9th Avenue stem $386,000 r Funded)
LID
onationSY ht-pf-Way) $1600, 000 ($166,901
$1,304,000
Transp Design & Pug o Creek) 1,
Gaarde Street ( Tracks to Farm ealignment
Bonita Road (T venue R $152,000
Walnut StteetlTiedeman A
rovements entDisttict $2,336,000
Lincoln Street Imp rovem miffed Projects $1,790,000
69th Avenue Local Imp Total Com
$I52,OU0
$2,336,000
FY 1 $220,000
999.2000
$944,000
ects $300,000 $50,000
Committed Pr
TIP Transit W aY) $20,000
ransit e for Future Protects t of-
'11F Rese v gn and Limited Righ - $30,000
Bunhatn Street (Dell P $233,000 $1,~g0,000
I,~Mapleleaf Street @ l st P 'Venue
ect) $60,000
Circulation and Pelhts i it
hts (Pilot Proj $545,000
Traffic Crosswal
kance program $3,800,000
imbedded a or MaintenLig
P Traffic alm gprogram Totals for PY I999-2000
Calming
Traffic
$325,000
Fy 2400-a1 $2,039,000 $10,000
eserve Walnut $30,000
TIF Transit R uail llollo N to and ROW) $60,000
venue (Design
Street Exten ~ l s
Gaarde street @ Pa$~ A-1
Mapleleaf meat (Design)
Traffic Studies Realign
Plallunziker(Scoffins
A~'pE~~ A
PROGRAM
TAL R~VEMENT
11,A?
9 000 CAl1
mom S'mm PR~,~RAlll~ G
~Y TAB G~ -
GAs
. $80,000
pp
OJECT $300,000
lacement (Design) $60,000
Tigard Street Bridge Rep $600,000
a1or Maintenance program $2,364,040
Pavement Program Totals for FY 2000-O1
Calming
Traffic
$430,000
FY 2001-02 $235,000
TIF Transit Reserve $860,000 $80,000
'Tip Reserve for Projects to walnut $30,000
ua" 1 venue and Const.)
Gaarde Street Exten ~ ~ s Avenue ( $60,000
ylapleleaf Street @ $350,000
Traffic Studies $90,000
Ce Program $610,000
pedestrian improvements
pavement Major Maintenan $1,525,000
Program Totals for FY 2001-02
Traffic Calming
FY 2002-03 $530,000
$1,225,000 $30,000
TIF Transit Reserve $60,000
TIF Reserve for profects $430,000
Traffic Studies $100,000
pedestrian Improvements $620,000
Pavement Major Maintenance program , $1,755,000
Traffic Calming Program Totals for FY 2002-U3
$62Q,OOQ -
pY 2003-04 $2,035,000 $30,000
TIF Transit Reserve
TIF Reserve rojects
page A-2
Traffic studies
MPROVBMBNTPRQGRAM
1999-2004 CAPITAL I
i~S']17f1Di.Lil1 i t711~i1
STREET SYSTEM PROGRAIM
GAS TAX OTHER FUNDING
TIF
PROJECT
$60,000
Pencstrian improvements $440,000
Pavement Major Maintenance Program $100,000
Traffic Calming Program $630,000
Totals for FY 2003-04 $2,655,000
FY 2004-05
$700,000
TIF Transit Reserve $2,755,000 $30,000
TIF Reserve for Projects $60,000
Traffic Studies
Pedestrian Improvements $450,000
Pavement Major Maintenance Program $100,000
Traffic Calming Program Totals for FY 2004-05 $3,455,000 $640,000
FY 2005-06
$770,000
TIF Transit Reserve $3,385,000
TIF Reserve for Projects $30,000
Traffic Studies $60,000
Pedestrian Improvements $440,000
Pavement Major Maintenance Program $120,000
Traffic Calming Program $650,000
Totals for FY 2405-06 $4,155,000
Page A-3
APPENDIX A
1999.2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PADS SYSTEM PROGRAM
PROJECT PAR--X-SD:C GREENSPACES OTHER/GRANT
Committed Projects
1 Cook Park expansion $165,000
2 Woodard Park play structure $60,000
3 Woodard Park improvements $50,000
4 Fanno Creek Park trail lighting $60,000
5 Tigard St./Fowler Sch trail $125,000
6 Fowler Sch/Woodard Pk trail $42,000
7 Woodard Pk/Grant Ave trail $55,000
8 Grant Avenue/Main St trail $40,000
9 Main St/Ash Ave trail $150,000
10 Greenspace acquisitions $185,000
11 Bottom Barriers $20,000
Total Committed Projects $767,000 $185,000
FY 1999-2000
Committed Projects $767,000 $185,000
12 Cook Park Expansion $400,000 $15,000
13 ADA Transition Plan $30,000
14 Fenced dog park $20,000
15 Upgrade playgrounds $50,000
16 Cache Creek Park Master Plan $37,500
17 Realign trail at N. Dakota $10,000
Totals for FY 1999-2000 $1,277,000 $222,500
FY 2000-01
18 Cook Pk/85th Ave trail const $100,000
19 Cook Park field drainage $250,000
20 Upgrade playgrounds $80,000
21 Trail alignments study $30,000
1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPENDIX B Page B-I
r
]PARKS SYSTEM[ PROGRAM
PARK SAC GiZEENSPACES OT~PGRANT
PROJECT
$35,000
22 Walnut/Woodard Pk trail $50,000 $1,000,000
23 "Albertson's" Park improvements $320,000
24 Tual Riv Ped Bridge $1,320,000
25 Bonita Road Park $545,000
Totals for FY 2000-01 a
FY 2001-02 $320,000
26 "Canterbury" neighborhood park $80,000
27 Upgrade playgrounds $80,000
28 Cook park/RR trail $480,000
Totals for FY 2001-42
FY 2002-03 $180,000
29 Upgrade playgrounds $150,000
,000 $30,000
oard facility $30,000
30 Provide rollerbld/skateb $250
31 Renovate Woodard Park $580,000
Totals for FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04 $416,000
32 - Hall/Bonita trail $80,000
33 Upgrade playgrounds $496,000
Totals for FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
$415,000
34 Bonita Rd/Durham trail $100,000
35 Develop nature park $515,000
Totals for FY 2004-05
Page B-2
APPENDIX lB
1999.2000 CAPITAL IMPROVF-ML ENT PROGRAM
~S SV5~~ - SFAS o
I'R~~CT
~~s4,aoo
~y 2oas-45 ~lao,ooo
d jot jackPark Exp• $554,aa0
enesis traily 2005-46
36 Acquire lan for
pathfinder~~ 'totals
37
I
page B-3
Ap~~~vxx~
L IMPRpVEMENT PRGGP W
X999-7000 CAPITA
SYSTE P~~G R G
IT SE~E~2~ o~
t: .
PROJECT
~a,oaQ
$SOO,ooo
F>' 1999-2000 $100,000
aintenanCeea Sealer Extensions $84,000
Sanitary Sewer Ma maintenance
commercial M
Neighborhood and road $25,000 $21500,000
tteet to Burnham
Commercial S 11ton Court) $2,5aQ,a00
Bonita Road (at M plan Studies $105,000
Sanitary Sewer Facili U grades Y 1999-2000
achy p Totals for F
Reserve for Cap
$40,000
X000-O1 5220,000 52,885,000
FY - 52,885,x04
maintenance Sealer Extensions
Sanitary Sewer, lAa3or merc1 .1 Area $260,040
hborhoad and Com
;~ieig U grades FY 2000-41
Reserve for capacity p Totals for
$40,400
$224,040 $321000
p1' 2001-x2 $3,210,000
Major Maintenance ea Sewer Extensions
sanitary se', Commercial Ar $260,000
Neighborhood and y Upgrades 2001-02
Reserve for Capacity Totals for FY
$40,000
FY 2002-03 $220,000 53,655,000
a)or Maintenance Sewer Extensions 53,655,000
Sanitary d Sewer Mercial Area 526x,000
apand Cacityomrn
Upgrades Y 2002-03
Neighborhoo Totals for
Reserve for C
page C-1
C -.831110
CAPITAL 1yIpRpVEMENT PRCGAM
1999-2000
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM ]PROGRAM
PROJECT M STACTED SDC OTHER FUNDING
FY 2003-04
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $40,000
Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $220,000
Reserve for Capacity Upgrades $4,040,000
Totals for FY 2003-04 $260,000 $4,040,000
FY 2004-05
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $40,000
:Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $220,000 ~
Reserve for Capacity Upgrades $4,425,000
Totals for FY 2004-05 $260,000 $4,425,000
FY 2005-06
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $40,000
Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $220,000
Reserve for Capacity Upgrades $4,810,000
Totals for FY 2005-06 $260,000 $4,810,000
1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPENDIX C Page C-2 ,
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PROGRAM
PROJECT i~7 + ' < CAD SDC OTHER FUNDING
Committed Projects
118th Court Erosion Control $50,000
Lincoln Street Drainage Improvements $60,000
116th Avenue Drainage Improvements $75,000
Washington Square Pretreatment $100,000
Summer Creek Wetland Restoration at 121st Avenue $260,000
Total Committed Projects $185,000 $360,000
FY 1999-2000
Committed Projects $185,000 $360,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program $60,000
Pacific Highway and Durham Road $50,000
Walnut Terrace (at 69th Avenue) $80,000
Thom Street (at 82nd Avenue) $75,000 ($65,600 CDBG)
Hoodview Street Drainage $40,000
Reserve for USA Master Plan Projects $90,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects $35,000
Totals for FY 1999-2000 $450,000 $450,000
FY 2000-01
Reserve for USA Master Plan $130,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects $115,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $60,000
Totals for FY 2000-01 $175,000 $130,000
FY 2001-02
Reserve for USA Master Plan $170,000
1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPENDIX D Page D-1
L~~,{L,IJJ-111 1 ✓yt.t
:SD~C ING
S' ' CD
P
!E~ $215,000
Plan projects $60,000 5170,000
Reserve for public Facility $275,000
Storm Drainage Major MaintenaTo als for FY 2001-02
$210,000
FY 2002-03 $315,000
Reserve `or USA Master Plan Projects $60,000 $210>004
Reserve for Public Facility $375,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance
Totals for FY 2002-03
$250,000
FV 2003-04
$415,000
for USA Master Plan $60,000
Reserve $250,000
Reserve for public Facility plan PTOJects $475,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance
Totals for FY 2003-04
$290,000
Fy 2004-05 $515,000
Reserve for USA Master Plplan Projects $60,000 $290,000
Reserve for Public Facility $575,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance
Totals for FY 2004-05
$330,000
Fy 2005-06 $615,000
Reserve for USA Master Plan Projects $60,000
Plan $330,000
Reserve for Public Facility $675,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Totals for Fl' 2005-06
page D-2
AppENDIX D
1999-2000 CAp1TAL 1MpROVFMF14T pROGRAM
r
STEM PROGRAM
$90 00
iron water '
inch cast
460 feet of 8-ductile iron on SW
with 12- ductile iron; rovement
inch with 8-inch
iron main
ch cast er/Walnut interseet►on imp
1999-2000 water main water
10-inch cast iron of b-m TiedemanlFor+n
Replace 4b0 feet of and 175 feet rt of the $750,000 ;
in
• inch ductile iron; This pro3ect is pa
W K g
main with 8- Walnut. SW 131st Avenue to S ect
Tiedeman Street at 5W Bend Road from 3 The County P .
SW Beef B ded by NISI storm drainage
pro3ect. main on ill be fun sidewalks, 1997 due to
transmission ,s pro3eCt that retaining walls, ect during
400 feet of 24-inch n the county,
lanes to three, ostponed this pro]
install 3, completed la road from The County p $60,000 Ur. , rth . This is to be Beefd horizonta
Bend 1 realignment. SW
consists of widening on SW Lincoln street from
ns
vements and vertical an water mains with
impro 6-inch ductile pipe old cast iron
Measure 47 water main with rogram of replacing
6-tncast iron oing p $4p,000
feet of cth This is an on-g
Replace 800 W 91st Avenue' rovement program' a reducing stations are
Road to S , s street imp Tne pressur an elevation of
Greenberg as part of the city ow~tain sy,tem• ernes below becomes
On Bull t tio prop water pressure two
ductile iron pipe within the Bull A0
stations e on-line. of 430 430 feet, il1e we have identified
of ressure reducing At an elevation u an timing, facilities.
Construct.on p when new subdivisio ,is °zone ending P a reducing
cted as needed, the 713•foot sere ustbe reduced- Dep uire pressur - $60,000
constru iced from Pressure m West) that would req Ridge
580 feet are sere erating (working) uail Ho11ow taro Road to Hawks
excessive and the °p p awn", Hill and Q avenue from Bull Ivlo
proposed subdivisions ( main on SW 150th will $144,000
inch distribution 121st A.vanue'
Install 2,700 feet Of m)• SW North Dakota between 115th and 'This $~,?340,000
0
(gull Mountain sy 1999.200
inch transmission main on
Road. Total for
Install 1,450 feet of 12- to SW geholls
° con lete a 12-inch loo
ement Program
AYpENDiX ~
1999-2000 Capital improv
page E-1 of 4
yS1~+ENS pg®GRAM
W A~itg IS
;V'f:3?: ^ti ~y„y ~t,•.. ..trw^
`t t':; T 00
a' 5285 0
let,
This project
and Durham
between Bo Included in this estimate is the
SW 79th Avenue beo e Bn Services. 5950,000
200Q-Ol water main on tovement "l l wate. W 135th
Street Imp t and relocation of.33 Former to S
inch cast iron from 121st &
4,000 feet of with SW 79th Avenue of a new fiSW W treet frart of the Walnut Street
replace with the installation SW Walnut S GLed as P 5565,000
is in conjunction drams, ,in along be constru
ent of three fire by ission m ro ect would
This P ] W Barrows Road.
replacem 24-inch transm and Vault. to
S X000
Install 5,600 feet of Valves an and Walnut
• V Control SW 135th Avenue an$1,$00
Avenue ane pRoject. ain from 2000'2001
lmprovem p o ec l6-inch transmission m Total for FY
. Install 4,440 feet
5760,000
to Bull
from SVd King to the
main on SW Beefe B2 ectR~o ncrease water transr~ssion
FY 2001 0 transmie ssion second of a three-phas p 51,000,000
Of 24-inch corner.
Install 3,800 feet oW This is th IM 217 to Bradley
• oad and 99 Lain. Road, from 0
meter vault ($100,
Bull Moue 40).
vlountain R new
main on SW Green'v station and ne ~1,~60,000
south side of B iss ($100,000)
ion and a PR for 4 217 2001-02
This would et of 2-inch der transmHwy Total ''Y
4,000 fe
under
include a bore
$380,000
W Gaarde Street. This
ountain Road to SW Gaarde Street.
W Bull M eef. Bend Road to S
from S B
mattr venue on
( 2002-03 transmission A
24-inch SW 131st 1,900 feet of Project from
Install letes the new 24-inch IooP
comp
ital Improvement Program
AY P~,N~1X E
1999-20Q0 Cap
Page E-2 of 4
was
R gysv% F C1~ vVA'1'ERfun
$320,
Dakota.
pgp
North
SW Walnut Street to SW
i
~ W 121st Avenue from sized transmission facilities.
$252,000
water main on S medium growth' on gull
needing additional reinforcement om epending uP
Install 3,300 feet of 12-inch on gr
s This area was identified as elevation of 410 or 550 feet, d
with an overflow $952,000
Reserve fund for a reservoir Total for'F'Y 2042-03
e
~;'Iountain.
oad 5300,000
X1 lane toSrnBeef Bend R 2003-0'1 from SW Canterbury ce area- 'fltt cost
Install I" ri facilities to the south end of our service
main on S160,000-
-,his 00 feet of l renforce transmissto
s
water main "11l Road from SW 135th Avenue to
on Sti'~ Scholls P ~s wo complete a circulation loop for
includes a rock allowance' water main
12-inch SW Scholls Ferry 5400,440
Install 1,620 feet of ent complex on wth, on
access to apartm dePending upon gro
emergency
this area. overflow elevation of 410 or 550 feet, 2003-04 5860,000
Reserve fund for a reservoir wtth an Total for FY
Bull Mountain.
$410,000
SAN
P}( 2004-05 main on SW Beef Bend Road from SW 146th Avenue to
f 16-inch tortransmtsston
e reservoir (410 zone).
Install 3,200 feet o to 150th Avenue north t
1999-2000 Capital improvement Program p,FFEN~x E
Page E-3 of 4
AT~R SYaT~M PROGRAM Wp;TER;F
v 000
tk'r t r.. :u overflow
r~• n with an Bull Mountal water
ank of on from the 410
the northern fl Q 000) to transfer
allon resewair rnPing Mstation ($1 $54,000
of 1 million $ s ystem•
Construction feet. Also included is a 11 ounta~n. 4-inch cast
This is within the Bull This is to replace an aging
elevation of 550 reservoir.
zone to the new ain on SW Scoffins SatrC year. Total for FY 764,000
4-inch water increased Maintenance m this p 2004-05 $1'
Install 1,500 feet of
. ron water main that has had 000
5410,
1461h Avenue to SW
main on SW Beef Bend Road from SW
vansmission m $500,000
10 zone). , on growth, on
EY 2006-06 feet of 16-inche reservoir (4 depending V-P
Install 3,200 furor feet,
150th Avenue northto elevation of 410 or 550 $9,01000
oir with an overflow Total for ~ 2004-05
Reservservountain.
the souBull M -
_2000 Capital Improvement Program E
1999
page E-4 of 4
t-;aprtat improvement Program
APPENDIX F
1997-98 Capital Improvement Program
r
Appendix F
CITY OF TIGARD FACT SHEET
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
Contact: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E., (503) 639-4171
AGENDA: June 23, 1998
TOPIC: 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program
BACKGROUND:
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes improvements to the streets, storm
drainage, sanitary sewer, water and parks systems. The program is updated each year, and
is reviewed and approved by the City Council. The CIP formulation is separate from the
yearly operating budget process but proceeds on a parallel course and is approved on the
same fiscal year basis as that budget. The formulation process begins with Citizen
Involvement Team input followed by Planning Commission review and recommendation.
The final step in this process is City Council review and approval. The CIP, through the
adoption process, establishes the budget for each fiscal year and serves as a planning
document to guide the infrastructure improvements over the following 6 years.
The 1998-99 CIP documents outline the program and present the recommended projects
for Fiscal Year 1998-99. Also included is a tentative list of projects for the following six
years. The 1998-99 CIP was submitted to Planning Commission on May 20, 1998. At its
meeting on June 1, 1998, Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed
program with minor modifications to conform to the Finance Director's updated
projections of funding availability. Council may make additional modifications to the
plan during its review and approval process. The approved plan would be the .approved
Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 1998-99.
COST: The 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program project amounts are,
based on the Finance Directors funding projections for Fiscal Year 1998-99.
1 \c1tyw1deVacts\6p98fct doc
I
I
AGENDA ITEM a
FOR AGENDA OF June 23 1998
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program
PREPARED BY: A.P. Duenas DEPT HEAD OK~ CITY MGR OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL,
Adoption of the 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program and approval of the 1998-99 Projects.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, adopt the 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program as
proposed in the attached memorandum dated June 2, 1998, with Appendices A through E.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached is a memorandum outlining the 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program. This memorandum presents
the recommended projects for 1998-99 and a tentative list of projects for the following six years. The 1998-99
Capital Improvement Program was submitted to Planning Commission on May 20, 1998. At its meeting an June
1, 1998, the Planning commission recommended approval of the proposed program with minor modifications to
conform to updated projections of funding availability.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Adopt the proposed Capital Improvement Program with additional modifications.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
The 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program supports the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow Transportation and Traffic
goals of Improve Traffic Safety (all strategies in the plan) and Improve Traffic Flow (all strategies in the plan).
FISCAL NOTES
]'he 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program project amounts are based on the Finance Director's funding
projections for Fiscal Year 1998-99.
. r ar,",%.-%c.p4S-99 dm
CITY OF TIGARD .
Shaping,4 Better Community
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TICARD
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard, OR 97223
Phone (503) 6394171
Fax (503) 684-7297
TO: CityCouncil
FROM: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: June 2, 1998
SUBJECT: 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program
This document presents the proposed 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for review and
approv: ! The Planning Commission approved. the 1998-99 CIP during its meeting of June 1, 1998,
with minor modifications necessary to conform to the latest projections on funding availability.
Background
The long-term Capital Improvement Program, initially adopted by the City Council on August 23,
1994, identified projects for the 1994-95 CIP Program and-proposed a list-of projects for the next 6-
year period. The Capital Improvement Program includes improvements to the streets, storm drainage,
sanitary sewer, water and parks systems. The Engineering Department manages the street, storm
drainage, and sanitary sewer CIP's. The Public Works Department manages the Water System CIP,
while the Parks CIP is managed jointly by the Planning and Engineering Departments.
The Capital Improvement Program is updated each year, and is reviewed and approved by the City
Council. The CIP formulation is separate from the yearly operating budget process but is approved on
the same fiscal year basis as the operating budget. While the program lists projects for subsequent
fiscal years, the projects shown are. tentative and are subject to change during the formulation process
for each specific budget year. The CIP, through the adoption process, therefore establishes the budget
for each fiscal year and serves as a planning document to guide the infrastructure improvements over
the following 6 years. During each budget year's update, the revenue estimates are adjusted, the project
cost estimates are reviewed, and the program and project priorities are re-evaluated based on changes
in City plans, citizen input, and additional data which may become available. The 1996-97 CIP listed a
6-year program; the 1997-98 CIP returned to the 7-year period originally established in 1994. The
1998-99 CIP continues with the 7-year program projections.
• Pedestrian Improvements (Gran( Avenue). This project $ 30,000
will provide a pedestrian path along Grant Avenue
connecting existing walkway along Park Street with School
Street and providing pedestrian access to Charles F. Tigard
Elementary School.
• 79th Avenue (Design and Rights-of-Way). This project S 100,000
will provide funding for selecting an engineering
consultant firm to prepare the final design of the entire .
street from Durham Road to Bonita Road.
• Traffic Studies: These are funds that are committed for $ 40,000
completion of the Transportation System Plan (TSP)
Update study, for the preparation of a regional
transportation plan specifically focusing on the Washington
Square area, and for the development of a feasible route to
connect Dartmouth with Hunziker Street and Hall
Boulevard south of City Hall.
• Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PMMP) - This is a $ 500,000
program of corrective and preventive maintenance on all paved
streets in Tigard. it addresses those streets that can still benefit
from corrective or preventative action. There was a backlog of
$1,500,000 in FY 97-98 for corrective overlays, repairs, and
slurry seals and last year's program expended $320,000 from
the $500,000 PN1Iv1P budget. Last year's program included
funding projections based on anticipated increase in. the gas
tax. That increase did not materialize. Hence, the budget
funding level was scaled back by $186,000 for all gas tax
funded projects. Projects for this program will be drawn from
the Pavement Overlay Backlog list (Appendix G), and from
evaluation of those streets that need slurry seals to extend the
pavement life expectancy. The list of AC overlay and slurry
seal project-, for this year's program is attached as Appendix 1.
00,000
• Traffic Calming Program - This program provides funding for $ -70;006
installation of traffic calming devices on streets that have
clearly demonstrated the need for installation of these devices.
The program emphasis to date has been on the installation of
speed humps. During FY 1998-99, a more comprehensive
approach to traffic calming will be initiated in accordance with
the Council goal for development of a Comprehensive Public
Facility Plan for streets. Speed hump installation will continue
to be the mainstay of the program until the comprehensive plan
Memorandum to City council
1998-99 Capital Improvement Program
Page 3 of 10
=Mimi
.L
Rccommendcd Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Projects
TIF Funding can be used only for highway and transit capital improvements that provide additiotial.
capacity to major transportation systems. This funding is limited to major collector and arterial streets,
and 50% must be spent on arterial streets. A major portion of these funds is being held in reserve until
our transportation planning is completed. The Tigard Triangle area will need major improvements to
develop streets to arterial and major collector standards. In addition, as the Walnut Island area is
annexed, TIF funding will be required to improve 121x` Avenue, Gaarde Street and Walnut Street. The
TIF reserve is currently large, and will grow even larger in the out years as shown in Appendix A. This
increase in the reserve will most likely not occur as major projects are initiated and implemented once
the transportation plan is completed. Significant drawdowns of the reserve amounts are expected in the
next several years.
The TIF-funded projects that are proposed for the next CIP Budget Year are as follows:
• Committed Projects: $ 761,920
• Greenburg Road/Mapleleaf Intersection - Construction $ 8,920
of this project began March 1998 and will be completed
by December 1998. This project is Federally funded and
the City's share of the project cost is $50,000. The sum of
$41,080 has been expended for the project, and the
remaining of $8,920 needs to be carried over to FY 98-99
to complete the construction.
• Bonita Road from the Railroad Tracks to the Fanno $ 674,000
Creek - $800,000 was funded in FY 97-98. Phase 1
construction cost was $126,000, which included
underground utilities. Phase 2 and 3 of this project will
include replacement of the railroad crossings and street
widening. Acquisition of right-of-way required for the
widening is delayed due to the ongoing transfer of
ownership between Burlington Northern Railroad and
ODOT. Therefore, the construction of the next two
phases of the project will be postponed until the spring of
1999.
• Walnut Street/Tiedeman Avenue Intersection Realign- $ 79,000
mcut and Signalization (Design) - This project was
funded in the amount of $80,000 in FY 97-98 to design
the realignment and signalization of the existing
Walnut/Tiedeman/Fonner Street intersection. A Request
for Proposal was prepared to select a qualified consultant
to design the project. Design is scheduled to begin in mid-
June 1998. The amount of $79,000 will be needed for the
consultant contract to complete the project design during
FY 1998-99
-i
Mcniorandtim to City Council
1998 99 Capital Improvement Program
Page 5 of 10
4
PARKS SYSTEM PROGRAM
Attached as Appendix B is the parks component of the City's seven-year CIP, which begins July 1998,
The list of projects in the proposed plan includes a single newly developed project: extending the
existing Fanno Creek Park trail to connect with Main Street. In almost all other respects, the seven-
year parks CIP is identical to last year's seven-plan, with the same projects listed by the same program
year. Projects budgeted for last year but not anticipated to be completed by July 1, 1998 are listed as
"committed projects". Projects identified during last year's CIP process for the 1998-99 program year
arc listed as "new projects".
The reason for making only limited changes to the previous parks CIP at this time is that a
comprehensive update of the city parks and open space master plan is currently underway. The revised
master plan will look at the long-range needs of the community, identify future park sites, establish
priorities for development, and recommend funding strategies to implement the plan. Methods for
involving the public in the master plan process include interviews with community leaders, community
workshops, a teacher-student outreach program, and a survey questionnaire distributed to 6,000
randomly selected households. Beginning in 1999, revisions to the parks CIP priorities will be
developed within the framework of this newly developed plan.
On the budget side, the CIP identifies additional unexpended Park Levy funds. Last year's budget
assumed that $17,000 remained in unspent levy funds. New information indicates that $91,000 is left
over from the 1989 levy. These funds have been allocated for 1998-99 Cook Park expansion projects.
Cook Park projects proposed for next year include sportsfield development, parking area construction,
restroom replacement, shelter construction, and water and irrigation line extensions.
In summary, pending the completion of the parks and open space master plan now in progress,
an essentially "no-change" parks CIP is proposed. No change means that the list and timing of projects
in the current CIP is unchanged from the parks CIP as approved last year. Among the 1997-98
projects, completed projects are deleted and projects still in progress are carried over to 1998-99.
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PROGRAM
The sanitary sewer funding has funding sources that are reserved for maintenance repairs on currently
unknown projects, capacity upgrades as recommended from the USA Master Plan, and for the
Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program. A new program was created by City Council in FY 1997-98
to extend sewers into commercial areas. This new program is included in the 1998-99 CIP budget. The
unrestricted portion of the Sanitary Sewer Fund can be used for repair and maintenance projects
Citywide and for extension of the existing system to unsewered areas. In addition, one of the City
Council goals is preparation of a Comprehensive Public Facility Plan for sewers, both storm and
sanitary. Several studies will need to be performed in FY 1998-99 to obtain information necessary for
preparation of the Sanitary Sewer Facility Plan. Funding for these studies is included in this budget.
The detailed project listing for 1998-99 and the full 7-year program is attached as Appendix C.
Mcmorandnni iu Gory Council
1998-99 ( ahiial Improvcrncnt t'loglam
I'dl;c 7 of 10
The detailed project listing is attached as Appendix D-' The projects currently proposed for C1P Budget
Year 1998-99 are as follows:
41 Committed Projects:
• Park Street Drainage - Park Street Drainage is a major $ 86,000
drainage improvement project between 107th Avenue and
Mira Court. The project design and rights-of-way
acquisition have been completed and remaining funding
will be carried forward into FY 1998-99 for construction
implementation. The remaining funding is not sufficient to
construct the project improvements. Additional funding is
being requested for this project as shown below.
• 118th CT. Erosion Control - This is an erosion control $ 30,000
project that needs to extend the improvements further
downstream to alleviate the ;ieavy erosion on the side
slopes and streambed. Design will begin in winter 1998
with project construction to follow in early summer 1999.
® Park Street Drainage - The project funding of $95,000 in FY $ 35,000
97-98 is insufficient to complete the project. The project
design required a drainage outfall adjacent to 110 h Avenue. As
a result, the estimated project cost has increased by $35,000.
This additional amount will supplement the project funding to
allow construction in FY 1998-99. Advertisement for bids is
scheduled for May 26, 1998, and construction is expected to
begin in late July 1998.
• Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program - This program $ 40,000
addresses minor storm drainage problems requiring more than
normal maintenance effort. The program in FY 97-98 included
minor drainage repairs totaling $21,000 on Main Street, View
Terrace, and Pinebrook Street. The Storm Drainage Major
Maintenance Program for FY 98-99 is proposed at the same
funding level as last year's program. The anticipated projects
for FY 1998-99 include drainage repairs at Walnut Terrace
(east of 69th), Durham Road at the Highway 99W intersection,
and 115th and 116th Avenues.
• Lincoln Street Drainage Improvements - The drainage system $ 60,000
upgrade on 91st Avenue, from Greenburg Road to Lincoln
Avenue, has been included in the 91st Avenue improvement
project. This project extends the drainage system upgrade
along 91" Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to Commercial Street
and provides a drainage outfall into the existing drainage ditch
adjacent to Commercial Avenue.
1
Memorandum to City Council
1998.99 Capital Improvement I'rograni
Page 9 of 10
,YC.. _ .:L, .e .X• ,a. L ,R , y~} ,.p.•~. ~.yy..~S2.:'A.r•1#7:•.tia~'•`4~.:~
PlEt03 C~ ''TF ~ GAS TA 'u.. 4THEFt ~DTIDII+IG
Committed Projects
Pod. Improvements - Grant Ave. 30,000
79th Avenue (Design and R/W) 100,000
Traffic Studies 40,000
Greenburg/Mapleleaf Intersection 8,920
Bonita Road - RR Tracks to Bridge 674,000
Walnut StreettTiedeman Avenue 79,000
Intersection & Approaches (Design)
91st Avenue Improvements from 188,000 (166,800 CDBG
Greenburg Road to Lincoln Street funds, 21,200 City funds)
TO'T'AL. Committed Projects 761.920 170,000 188,000
FY 1998-99
Committed Projects 761,920 170,000
TIF Transit reserve 100,000
TIF reserve for future projects 1,538,080
Pavement Major Maintenance 500,000
Traffic Calming Program X ..Ow
40; DW
Traffic Studies
Gaarde Street (Design and R/W) 500,000
Walnut Street Tiedeman Avenue 800,000
Intersection & Approaches (Design,
R/W and Construction)
Totals for FY 1998-99 3,:00,000 800,000
FY 1999-2000
TIF transit reserve 220,000
TIF reserve for future projects 3,380,000
Pavement Major Maintenance 300,000
Pedestrian improvements 50,000
79th Avenue (R/W and Construction) LID and Storm Drain Funds
Traffic Calming Program 60,000
Tigard Street Bridge Replacement 180,000
Totals for FY 1999-00 3,600,000 590,000
1998.99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page A-I
APPENDIX A
~i
I
Big
P'RO.IiEECI' !TIF GAS TAX OTHER FUNDING
FY 2004-2005
TIF transit reserve 700,000
71F reserve for future projects 7,700,000
Pavement Major Maintenance 300,000
Pedestrian improvements 50,000
Traffic Calming Program 60,000
Hall/Hunziker/Scofftns 234,000
Totats for FY 2004-2005 8,400,000 644,000
I: ~gus199-99cip\urau\ssrcip99.doc
H
CIO
E~
H
1998-99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page A-3
C~3
a APPENDIX A ~
PROJECTS METRO TIGARD PARK PA1, K SDC DONATION
GRNSP . GRNSP LEVY.
FY 2003-04
26. Fanno Creek Park Improvements 325,000
27. Tualatin River Pcd Bridge 500,000
FY 2004-05
28. Improvements to be determined from TBD
Parks Master Plan
_ IRWIN,
MINIM
%%TIG333\US R%DEPTS\ENG\GUS\98-9901 P\PARKSCIP.DOC
1998-99 (API i AL IMPROV IiMENT PROGRAM Page B-2
APPCNDIn B
UNRESTRICTED SDC
FY 2004-0S
Major maintenance 40,000
Reserve for capacity upgrades 2,930,000 5,285,000
Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions 200,000
Totals for FY 2003-04 3,17 0 000 5,285,000
Ui1d733WSR%DEFTS%ENG%GUS%9E-99CfflSEWER%SASE9E.DOC9&.99CUNSE WER%SASE9$.DOC
1998-99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page C-2
APPENDfx C
a
IN ffl~~ 'lit
SDC
FY 2003-04 1,400,000
Reserve for USA master plan
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance 40,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects 484,000
Totals for FY 2003-04 524,000 1,400,000
FY 2004-OS .
Reserve for USA master plan 1,500,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance 40,000
Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects 524,000
Totals for FY 2004-05 564,000 1,500,000
UT1G333WSROEFTS%ENG%GUS%9e•49aP%SORJUMSrsEw9e 000
1998-99 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Pagc D-2
APPENDIX D
Lwamsm-M I
J
MEMO
PROJECT ®ESCRUTIION WATER
FUND
• Reserve fund for a reservoir with an overflow elevation of 550 feet on the 111,000
northern flank-of Bull Mountain (Bull Mountain system).
• Total for FY 1999-2601,236,000
FY 2000-01
• Construction of a one.-million gallon reservoir on the northern flank of Bull 1,300,000
Mountain with an overflow elevation of 550 feet.. Also included is a pump-
ing station ($120,000) to transfer water from the 410 zone to the new
reservoir. This is within the Bull Mountain system.
• • Install 4,000 feet of 24-inch transmission main on SW Greenburg Road, from 1,000,000
Hwy 217 to Bradley Comer. This would include a bore under Hwy 217
(S 100,000) and a PRV station and new meter vault (S 100,000).
Total for FY 2000-01 2,300,000
FY 2001-02
• Install 3,200 feet of 16-inch transmission main on SW Beef Bend Road from 410,000
SW 146th Avenue to SW 150th Avenue north to future reservoir (410 zone).
• Install 3,800 feet of 24-inch transmission main on SW Beef Bend Road from 760,000
SW King Authur to Bull Mountain Road and 99W. This is the second of a
three phase project to increase water transmission to the south side of Bul!
Mountain.
Total for FY 2001-02 1,170,000
FY 2002-03
• Install 1,900 feet of 24-inch transmission main from SW Bull Mountain Road 380,000
to SW Gaarde Street. This completes the new 24-inch loop project from SW
131 st Avenue on Beef Bend Road to S W Gaarde Street.
a
i
i '
1998 99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page E-2
3
APPENDIX E
FY 1999-2000
Capital Improvement Program
APPENDIX G
Pavement Corrective and Preventative Maintenance Backlog
Summary
Reconstruction Projects: $ 749,433
Resurfacing Projects (Overlay): $ 835,387
Slurry Seal Projects: $1,094,773
Grand Total: $2,679,593
a
APPENDIX G
Page 2
Date: 419199 10:44:45 Page 1 of 1
Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 0
TIGARD ENGINEERING
City of Tigard
Costs Updated: 12/9198 7 9 0 0 0 +
Pave Length Prelim 1 7 5 0 0 +
Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Claw Type (ft) PCI Est S 1 0 7 3 3
199900008 79 TH AV CHURCHILL WY N 145 THURSTON DR N 0 RE MNMNP FLEX 1080 33 79000 3 5 2 0 0
199900013 SCHOOL ST PACIFIC HW N 0 GRANT AV N 0 RE LNMNN FLEX 350 26 17500 9 9 3 3 3 +
199900015 79 TH AV BOND ST N 145 CHURCHILL WY N 0 RE MNMNP FLEX 115 37 10733 6 3 3 3 3
199900021 121 ST AV SUMMERCRE DR N 0 SUMMER ST N 0 RE CNMNT FLEX 320 47 35200
199900025 79 TH AV GENTLEW00 DR N 145 MARA CT N 0 RE MNMNt FLEX 1490 47 99333 4 1 0 0 0
199900026 ROSS ST HALL BL E 0 81 ST AV E 0 RE MNMNP FLEX 950 47 63333 6 1 0 0--
199900030 BONITA RD FANNO CRE BR E 0 RR CROSSI E 0 RE CNMIN FLEX 390 53 41600 5 8 6 6 7 •
199900032 FONNER ST 113 TH PL E 0 111 TH PL E 0 RE CNMW FLEX 680 54 61200 4 6 6 5 6 6 • #
199900064 FONNER ST 115 TH AV E 0 115 TH AV E 800 RE CNMNN FLEX 800 64 58667
Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions.
All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed.
Date: 419/99 10:54:9 Page 1 of 1
Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 0
TIGARD ENGINEERING #
City of Tigard '
Costs Updated: 12/9/98 9 6 0 0 0,
i
Pave Length Prelim 6 6 0 6 71. +
Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPe (ft) PCI Eat $ 3 7 4 0 0
199900001 BURNHAM ST ASH AV N 0 ASH AV N 760 RE CNCIT FLEX 760 28 96800 3 2 0 2 6 7
199900002 BURNHAM ST HALL BL N 0 ASH AV N 0 RE CNCIT FLEX 1205 30 186067
199900038 SCOFFINS ST ASH AV N 470 MAIN ST N 0 RS LNCIN FLEX 425 46 37400
199900057 ASH AV COMMERCIA ST N 165 SCOFFINS ST N 0 RO LNCIN FLEX 415 55 443
199900141 MAIN ST FANNO CRE BR E 0 SCOFFINS ST E 0 RO CNCIT FLEX 1795 78 3216
199900232 MAIN ST PACIFIC HW E 0 PACIFIC HW E 285 RO CNCIT FLEX 285 84 589
199900292 SCOFFINS ST HALL BL N 0 ASH AV N 155 RO LNCIN FLEX 625 82 479
199900327 BURNHAM ST ASH AV N 760 MAIN ST N 0 RO CNCIT FLEX 150 86 270
199900»14 ASH AV HILL ST E 0 HILL ST E 270 DO MNCIN FLEX 270 71 0
199900430 ELECTRIC ST MAIN ST N 0 END N 0 DO LNCNN FLEX 180 74 0
/99900435 MAIN ST PACIFIC HW E 285 FANNO CRE BR E 0 DO CNCIT FLEX 305 76 0
199900490 ASH AV END N 0 BURNHAM ST N 0 DO MNCIN FLEX 285 85 0
199900558 COMMERCIAL ST HALL BL N 0 MAIN ST N 28500 MNCIT FLEX 1765 90 0
199900678 MAIN ST SCOFFINS ST E 0 PACIFIC HW E 000 CNCIT FLEX 550 85 0
199900780 TIGARD ST PACIFIC HW E 0 MAIN ST E 000 MNCIN FLEX 158 91 0
199900953 ASH AV HILL.ST E 264 END E 0 DO MNCIN FLEX 53 95 0
199900954 ASH AV COMMERCIA ST N 0 COMMERCIA ST N 16500 LNCIN FLEX 165 93 0 '
Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions.
All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed.
Date: 4/9/99 10:45:54 Page 1 of 1
Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 0 •
TIGARD ENGINEERING
Costs Updated: 1219198 City of Tigard 7 4 5 3
1
1 9 3 1 1
Pave Length Prelim 1
Priorlty Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO (ft) PCI Est $ 6 4 2 7
199900375 BULL MOUNTAIN F ASPINE RI DR E 160 117 TH AV E 0 RS CFMNN FLEX 210 88 17453 1 0 0 2 2 •
199900168 WALNUT TE 69 TH AV E 0 69 TH AV E 395 RS LNMNN FLEX 395 76 19311 1 4 7 1 4
199900154 BOONESFERRY UI CITY LIMI N 0 CITY LIMI N 160 RS ANMIT FLEX 160 80 16427 1 3 d 6 9
199900153 136 TH CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 WALNUT LN N 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 205 74 10022 1 3 2 3 6 7
199900129 KATHERINE ST KAROL CT E 0 KAROL CT E 317 RS LNMNN FLEX 317 72 14714
199900125 CENTER ST 95 TH AV E 0 95 TH AV E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 280 71 13689 , 1 0 0 0 '
199900095 BULL MOUNTAIN F 114 TH AV E 0 PACIFIC HW E 0 RS CFMNN FLEX 1425 71 132367 l 0 9 7 3 .
199900083 SPRUCE ST 89 TH AV E 0 HALL BL E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 720 62 31680 1 2 5 4 0
199900081 FERN ST CITY LIMI E 0 138 TH AV E 225 RS LNMNN FLEX 355 62 20973 3 1 0 7 6 • _
199900079 95 TH AV END N 0 OAK ST N 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 285 61 12540 5 4 2 0 Q
199900075 PINE ST 69 TH AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 815 60 31876 1 0 3 2 5 +
199900058 KABLE ST END E 0 END E 693 RS LNMNN FLEX 693 55 54208 r,
199900040 THORN/81ST CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 THORN ST E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 106 47 10325 S / 3 3
199900029 MEADOW ST TIEDEMAN AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 570 42 55733 2 1 4 2
199900028 70 TH AV OAK ST N 0 END N 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 515 41 20142 5 r. 0 0 0..
199900023 BOONESFERRY UI CITY LIMI N 160 DURHAM RD N 0 RS ANMIT FLEX 500 50 55000 1 6 3 0 4
199900020 115 TH AV NORTH DAK ST N 0 TIMOTHY PL N 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 230 35 16304 3 1 6 8 0
199900018 OAK ST 67 TH AV E 0 66 TH AV E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 360 34 31680 3 4 9 0 7 .
199900017 66 TH AV HAMPTON ST N 0 HAMPTON ST N 510 RS LNMIN FLEX 510 30 34907 1 j 7 2 J
199900010 BONITA RD INTERSTAT HW W 0 72 NO AV W 0 RS CNMIN FLEX 1170 40 137280
199900007 OAK ST 69 TH AV E 0 67 TH AV E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 365 21 34120 2 1 2 0
199900004 NORTH DAKOTA S 121 ST AV E 0 119 TH AV E 0 RS MNMNf FLEX 520 28 29236 2 9 2 3 6
797967•#
Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions.
All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed.
4653•
Date: 4/9199 10:47:41 Page 1 of 8 4 9 5 0,
Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 1 3 5 3 .
TIGARD ENGINEERING 2 6 3 7 +
City of Tigard
Costs Updated: 12/9/98 1 7 8 5 • 4.
Pave Length Prelim 3 9 3 0
Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class Type (H) PC[ Est $ 2 7 4 2- .
199900006 NORTH DAKOTA S SCHOLLS F RD E 0 PRIVATE RD E 0 SE MNMIN FLEX 620 31 4653 5 2 0
199900012 TIEDEMAN AV MEADOW ST N 0 TIGARD ST N 0 SE CNMN1% FLEX 990 40 4950 3 3 8 0 .
199900016 TIEDEMAN AV CITY LIMI N 0 CITY LIMI N 290 SEE CNMN1% FLEX 290 42 1353 5 4 4 fr
199900022 BELL CT 127 TH AV N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 565 36 2637
199900034 MCKENZIE ST END N 0 PACIFIC HW N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 315 45 1785 1 a 9 3
199900035 106 TH AV NORTH DAK ST N 0 BLACK DIA WY N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 855 45 3930 1 5 1
199900036 DURHAM RD SUMMERFIE DR E 0 113 TH AV E 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 470 56 2742 2 L? 6
199900037 GREENBURG RD CASCADE BL N 0 SHADY LN N 0 SE CNMIT FLEX 270 56 2520 3 9 7 .s
199900039 67 TH AV CLINTON ST N 0 END N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 845 46 3380 4 a 1
199900042 GREENBURG RD NORTH DAK ST N 0 ASH CREEK BR N 0 SE CNMIT FLEX 720 58 5440 1 3 6 (,I
199900043 66 TH AV HAMPTON ST N 510 FRANKLIN ST N 100 SE LNMIN FLEX 620 49 2893
199900044 121 ST AV SUMMER ST N 0 BURLHEIGH DR N 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 275 58 1513 9 1
199900045 BLACK DIAMOND 1 108 TH CT N 0 106 TH AV N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 505 50 2862 5 y 2 `
199900048 WALNUT ST BENISH ST E 0 135 TH AV E 0 SE CNM* FLEX 555 60 3978 1 5 4
199900050 GARDEN PL GARDEN PL N 0 GARDEN PL N 850 SE MNMIN FLEX 850 58 4817 1 0 6 1 7 .
199900051 NORTH DAKOTA S GREENBURG RD E 1075 95 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 240 52 1360 3 6 4 3 .
199900052 69 TH AV DARTMOUTH ST N 145 CLINTON ST N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 305 52 915 6 7 0 0
199900053 SANDBURG ST 72 ND AV E 630 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 935 53 5922
199900059 MARIE CT 128 YH AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 264 55 1540 6 8 7
199900060 NIMBUS AV CUL-DE-SA N 0 SCHOLLS F RD N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 1300 55 10617 3 1 2 0
199900061 NORTH DAKOTA S GREENBURG RD E 390 GREENBURG RD E 1073 SE LNMNN FLEX 683 55 3643 2 3 4 5
199900065 NORTH DAKOTA S PRIVATE RD E 0 TIEDEMAN AV E 0 SE MNMIN FLEX 1340 62 6700 3 6 3 2 .
199900066 SHADY LN GREENBURG RD E 0 GREENBURG RD E 1000 SE MNMIN FLEX 1000 62 6387 1 5 9 3 0
199900067 FRANKLIN ST 68 TH AV E 0 66 TH AV E 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 520 56 3120 3 1 0 5
199900068 92 ND AV PARKING L N 0 PARKING L N 335 SE MNMNP FLEX 335 63 2348
199900069 TIGARD ST SUMMERCRE DR E 0 115 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1056 57 5632 < 6 9 0
199900070 BONITA RD RR CROSSI E 0 INTERSTAT HW E O SS CNMIN FLEX 1990 65 1393( 1 6 8 0
199900072 NORTH DAKOTAS 119 TH AV E 0 115 TH AV E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 810 64 310! 4 5 0 5 .
199900073 SPRINGWOOO DR COTTONW00 LN E 0 IRONWOOD LP E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 510 64 289 5 5 7 3
199900077 72 NO AV PINE ST N 0 OAK ST N 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 420 67 168 4 4 3 5 .
199900078 85 TH AV CITY LIMI N 605 DURHAM RD N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 795 60 451 1 3 3 7 5 [ #
199900085 66 TH AV 68 TH PW N 0 HAMPTON ST N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 1045 62 55,
199900088 WALNUT ST PATHFINOE CT E 0 GRANT AV E 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 950 69 4435
Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions.
All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed.
1J•-.~1L1L111 1 N11111
I f ~ j
Date: 4/9199 10:47:41 Page 2 of 8 5 5 0 0 •
Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 1 3 2 6 .
TIGARD ENGINEERING 1 9 0 1
Costs Updated: 1219198 City of Tigard 3 3 5 5
6222-
Pave Length Prelim 1 k. 8 -8
Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class Type (ft) PCI Est S
/99900090 121 ST AV NORTH DAK ST N 0 MANZANITA CT N 665 SE CNMNT FLEX 970 70 7113 1 5 7 6 7 -
199900091 121 ST AV SPRINGW00 DR N 0 SCHOLLS F RD N 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 750 70 5500 c 4.3 5
199900100 PFAFFLE ST HALL BL E 0 HALL BL E 215 SE MNMIN FLEX 215 70 1326 1 7 5 0 -
199900104 KAROL CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 KATHERINE ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 317 66 1901 4 1 6 3
199900106 130 TH PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 MORNINGST OR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 610 66 3355 4 5 0 0
199900109 68 TH PW 66 TH AV N 0 HAMPTON ST N 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 1525 73 6222 3 3 4 3
199900112 ELMHURST ST 72 NO AV E 0 70 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 515 67 1288
199900113 GREENBURG RD LINCOLN AV N 0 98 TH AV N 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 2150 74 15767 1 5 1 5 2
199900115 FREWING ST ASH AV N 0 PACIFIC HW N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1430 68 6435 3 0 9 7 -
199900116 126 TH AV KAREN ST N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 375 68 1750 -5 3 9 9
199900117 NORTH DAKOTA S 108 TH .AV F 0 PRIVATE RD E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 785 73 4163 6 2 4 C
199900118 DURHAM RD 74 TH AV E 0 BOONESFER RD E 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 450 75 4500 4 6 5 7
199900119 KATHERINE ST 131 ST AV E 0 128 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 590 70 3343 7 4 1 3 ;
199900122 DURHAM RD SERENA CT E 0 92 NO AV E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 2020 75 15152
199900123 GAARDE ST 118 TH CT E 0 114 TH AV E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 1390 76 5097 4 7.9 2 '
199900124 72 NO AV OAK ST N 321 VENTURA OR N O SE MNMNP FLEX 1087 74 5399 1 -5 7 5 •
199900128 BONITA RD 79 TH AV E 0 MILTON CT E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 1170 76 6240 3 4 7 5
199900130 108 TH AV TITAN LN N 0 DURHAM RD N 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 880 76 4657 1 3 4 9 3
199900131 98 TH AV DURHAM RD N 0 SUMMERFIE DR N O SE CNMNP FLEX 1160 77 7413 5 8 6 7
199900132 PARK ST DERRY DEL CT E 0 WATKINS AV E O SE LNMNN FLEX 1250 72 4792
199900133 TIEDEMAN AV CITY LIMI N 195 106 TH AV N 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 225 77 1575 a 6 7
199900135 PARK ST WATKINS AV E 0 GRANT AV E 0 SE I,ANMNP FLEX 695 76 3475 1 4 1 0 a
199900136 DURHAM RD 92 NO AV E 0 HALL BL E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 1799 78 13493 5 6 0 2
199900137 GREENBURG RD CENTER ST N 0 LINCOLN AV N 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 800 78 5867 1 8 6 2 5
199900139 CLINTON ST 69 TH AV E 0 68 TH AV E 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 260 73 867 9 1 9 3 ;
199900142 OAK ST 66 TH AV E 0 65 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 235 73 1410 5 9 2 5
199900143 PFAFFLE ST 81 ST AV E 0 PACIFIC HW E 0 SE MNMIN FLEX 1130 77 5602' 2 9 7
199900144 DURHAM RD 113 TH AV E 0 SERENA CT E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 2510 78 .18825
199900145 MCDONALD ST 93 RD AV E 0 HALL SL E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 1830 78 9193 6 3 0 7
199900146 WATKINS AV WATKINS PL N 0 WALNUT ST N 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 1185 77 5925 1 2 2 5
199900152 114 TH PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 TIGARD ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 580 74 2997 1 Q fs 1 7 4
199900155 CASCADE BL GREENBURG RD N 2490 GREENBURG 2D N 3370 SE CNMIN FLEX 880 80 6307
199900156 PARK ST GRANT AV E 0 PACIFIC HW E 0 SE MNMIN FLEX 175 78 1225
Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions.
All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed.
Date: 419/99 10:47:41 Page 3 of 8 o
Project Candidate Summary Worksheet
TIGARD ENGINEERING 1 0 0 5 3 +
City of Tigard 3 1 6 8 +
Costs Updated: 1219198 1 3 5 3
Pave Length Prelim 3 2 3 8
Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO (ft) PCI Est $ 4 u 2 0
199900157 SUMMERCREST D TIGARD DR E 0 CUL•DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1885 75 10053 2 8 0 5
199900158 WALNUT ST GRANT AV E 0 PACIFIC HW E 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 475 80 3168 1 5 5 8 '
199900160 78 TH AV PFAFFLE ST N 1195 SPRUCE ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 280 75 1353
199900162 DERRY DELL CT PARK ST E 0 WATKINS AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 925 75 3238 6 9 7 9
199900163 MANZANITA ST 119 TH AV E 0 115 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 840 75 4620 1 2 0 8 "
199900165 108 TH AV END N 0 BLACK DIA WY N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 495 75 2805 6 7 5
199900166 108 TH CT BLACK DIA WY N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 275 75 1558 5 6 8 3
199900167 MORNINGSTAR OF WCODSHIRE LN E 0 CUL-DESA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1675 76 6979 7 3 3 8
199900169 COMMERCIAL ST 95 TH AV N 585 98 TH AV N 0 SE MNMIN FLEX 250 80 1208 9 3 5
/99900170 FONNER ST 111 TH PL E 0 CITY LIMI E 0 SE CNMND FLEX 150 81 675
199900171 NORTH DAKOTA S PRIVATE RD E 0 ANTON DR E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 775 80 5683 1 4 0 $
199900173 PATHFINDER WY CUL•DE-SA E 0 CUL•DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1295 77 7338 2 4 6 5 '
199900174 BLACK DIAMOND 1 PONDEROSA PL N 0 PONDEROSA PL N 165 SE LNMNN FLEX 165 77 935 8 5 3
199900175 MANZANITA CT 121 ST AV E 0 CUL-DESA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 264 77 1408 1 5 3 0 -
199900176 MERESTONE CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 121 ST AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 435 77 2465 3 8 5 3
199900177 MURDOCK ST 106 TH AV E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 160 77 853 1 0 3 5
199900178 PONDEROSA PL BLACK CIA WY N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 270 77 1530
199900179 SERENA WY PICKS CT E 0 GRIMSON CT E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 680 77 3853 t ti 5 3
199900180 STEVEN CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 CRESMER DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 230 77 1035 7 0 0
199900181 SUMMERCREST P CUL-DE-SA N 0 SUMMERCRE DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 310 77 1653 3 9 2 4
1199900182 FONNER ST 115 TH AV E 800 E 0 SE CNM* FLEX 175 82 700 6 7 7 7 •
199900185 HAMPTON ST 68 TH PW E 0 66 TH AV E 225 SE CNMIN FLEX 755 82 3924 1 5 0 0
199900186 LOCUST ST GREENBURG RD E 0 92 NO AV E 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 1070 82 6777 1 6 6 7
199900187 MURDOCK ST 98 TH AV E 0 97 TH AV E 0 SE CNMNI` FLEX 300 81 1500
199900188 OAK ST 72 ND AV E 0 71 ST AV E 0 SE CNM* FLEX 460 82 1687 1 6 6 3
199900189 WALNUT ST BARROWS (RD E 0 SHOPPING E O SE CNMNN FLEX 260 82 1863 1 6 4 8
199900190 WALNUT ST SHOPPING E 0 NORTHVIEW OR E 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 230 82 1648 7 0 0
199900191 69 TH AV PACIFIC HW N 0 PACIFIC HW N 140 SE CNMIN FLEX 140 82 700 1 6 6 `0
199900192 71 ST AV PINE ST N 0 OAK ST N 0 SE CNMNh FLEX 415 82 1660 1 6 0 0 •
199900193 72 NO AV BAYLOR ST N 1190 VILLA RID WY N 0 SE CNMNh FLEX 150 82 1600 6 3 2 9
199900194 OAK ST GREENBURG RD E 0 95 TH AV E 380 SE MNMIT FLEX 1085 81 6329
199900195 BENCHVIEW TE ALPINE VI CT E 0 BRIM PL E 525 SE MNMNP FLEX 2495 81 16218 1 6 2 1 8 •
199900196 COLONY CREEK C CUL•DE-SA E 0 CUL-OE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 850 78 3967 3 9 6 7
t10963•>
Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions.
All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed.
1333•
Date: 4/9/9910:47:41 Page 4 of 8 1 9 8 9
Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 4 5 1 8•. 1
TIGARD ENGINEERING 2 3 4 0
City of Tigard 9 5 3
Costs Updated: 12!9198
1563•
Pave Length Prelim 1 1 9 0 -
Priority Road Name From 'Offset To Offset Act Class Type (ft) PC[ Eat $
199900197 87 TH AV PAC!FIC HW N 0 CENTER ST N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 250 78 1333 6 2 0 5
199900200 116 TH AV END N 0 TIGARD DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 385 78 1989 6 1 8 0
199900203 BENCHVIEW TE BULL MOUN RD E 0 ALPINE VI E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 695 82 4518 1 1 5 3 8
199900204 MISTLETOE DR HILLSHIRE DR N 0 BENCHVIEW CT N . 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 360 82 2340 0 9 a
199900205 PFAFFLE ST 83 RD AV E 125 82 ND AV E 0 SE MNMIN FLEX 220 82 953 8 8 0
199900206 SATTLER ST 100 TH AV E 195 98 TH AV E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 475 82 1583
199900207 SERENA CT SERENA WY N 0 DURHAM RD N 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 210 82 11,90 2 1 7 5
199900210 WINTERLAKE DR SHORE DR N 0 WINTERLAK CT N 295 SE MNMNP FLEX 1000 82 6205 1 6 7 4
199900211 EDGEWOOD ST OMARA ST E 0 OMARA ST E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 2670 79 8180 6 1 3 3
199900212 WALNUT ST NORTHVIEW DR E 0 135 TH AV E 0 SE CNMN1 FLEX 1610 83 11538 2 2 6 7 '
199900213 115 TH AV TIMOTHY PL N 0 SPRINGW00 DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1535 79 8098 1 3 6 0
199900214 76 TH AV VARNS ST N 0 CRESTVIEW ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 330 80 880 2 4 3 7 -
199900215 91 ST AV GREENBURG RD N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 725 80 2175
199900216 CORYLUS CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 HAZELTREE TR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 372 80 1674 2 2 3 6
199900217 GARDEN PARK PL 110TH AV E 0 110TH AV E 1115 SE LNMNN FLEX 1115 80 6133 2 1 0 0
199900218 JULIA PL CUL-DE-SA E 0 93 RD AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 400 80 2267 1 7 0 7
199900219 LEHMAN ST GREENBURG RD E 0 GREENBURG RD E 255 SE LNMIN FLEX 255 80 1360 2 0 'v 7
199900220 MARTHA ST COPPER CR DR E 175 93 RD AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 430 80 2437 1 9 5 4 6
199900221 MILLEN DR 93 RD AV E 0 92 ND AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 395 80 2238 6 2 6 2
199900223 SCOTT CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 98 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 450 80 2100
199900224 113 TH PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 CUL-DE•SA N 320 SE LNMNN FLEX 320 80 1707 7 9 3 3
199900225 123 RD CT CUL-DE•SA N 0 KATHERINE ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 430 80 2007 2 9 4 7
199900226 HILLSHIRE DR CUL-DE-SA N 0 BLUE GUM CT N 890 SE MNMNP FLEX 3175 83 19546 2 1 3 3 -
199900227 SERENA WY WOODCREST AV E 0 PICKS CT E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1105 80 6262 1 4 9 6
199900228 93 RD AV CUL-DE-SA N 0 MARTHA ST N 305 SE LNMNN FLEX 1400 80 7933 1 6 0 0
199900229 MILLEN DR COPPER CR DR E 0 MILLEM194 CT E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 520 80 2947 3 2 8 2 1
199900230 CARDINAL LN SEQUOIA P E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 400 84 2133'
199900231 GAARDE ST 121 ST AV E 0 121 ST AV E 264 SE CNMND FLEX 264 84 1496 1 4 5 8
199900233 121 ST AV MERESTONE CT N 0 SUMMERCRE DR N 0 SE CNMN7 FLEX 300 84 1600 1 9 0 1
199900234 68 TH PW HAMPTON ST S 0 66 TH AV S 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 895 84 3282 1 2 8 6 6
199900235 BOXELDER ST HILLSHIRE DR N 0 MINT PL N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 265 81 1458 1 3 4 3 2 9 #
199900236 PATHFINDER CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 WALNUT ST E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 422 81 1901
199900237 IRONWOOD LP SPRINGW00 DR N 0 SPRINGW00 OR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 2270 81 12866
Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions.
All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed.
10200.1
Date: 4/9/99 10:47:41 Page 5 of 8 4 5 7 9`
Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 1 3 8 5 5
TIGARD ENGINEERING 1 2 5 0 •
Costs Updated: 12/9/98 City of Tigard 2 4 3 7 `
1587••
Pave Length Prelim 2 1 5 3
Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Clan Type (n) PCI Eat $
199900238 RIVERWOOD LN RIVERWOOD PL E 130 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1825 81 10200 1 3 2 0 1
199900240 CANTERBURY LN PACIFIC HW E 0 109 TH AV E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 785 84 4579 3 6 5 8 • 1
199900244 COTTONWOOD Ln 115 TH AV N 0 SPRINGW00 OR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 2445 82 13855 1 6 0 0
199900245 76 TH AV END N 0 SPRUCE ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 250 82 1250 1 9 1 7 7 •
199900246 86 TH AV INEZ ST N 0 GREENSWAR LN N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 430 82 2437 5 5 2 2 • ,
199900247 87 TH CT INEZ ST N 0 CUL-OE•SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 280 82 1587 4 6 2 0
199900249 93 RD AV NORTH OAK ST N 0 END N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 380 82 2153
199900250 98 TH AV COMMERCIA ST N 0 LONDON CT N 165 SE LNMNN FLEX 240 82 1320 2 0 0 7
199900251 ALPINE VIEW BENCHVIEW TR E 0 MISTLETOE DR E 490 SE LNMNN FLEX 665 82 3658 3 ~ 2 3
199900252 ALPINE VIEW CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 BENCHVIEW TR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 300 82 1600 1 4 2 3 .
199900253 ASCENSION DR MISTLETOE DR N 0 WALNUT LN N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 4180 32 19177 5 2 0
199900254 ASHFORD ST 76 TH AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1045 82 5922 1 6 1 5
199900256 BENISH ST WALNUT ST E 0 MORNING H DR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 840 82 4620 3 0 8 0
199900257 BEREA DR CRESMER DR E 0 GARRETT ST E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 430 82 2007
199900258 BRIM PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 BENCHVIEW TR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 695 82 3823 1 1 7
199900259 BROADMOOR PL END N 0 WHITEHALL LN N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 305 82 1423 3 1 2 7
199900262 CLINTON ST 67 TH AV E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 130 82 520 6 5 0
199900364 COOK LN 107 TH AV E 0 WATKINS AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 495 82 1815 1 2 3 2 .
199900265 FAIRVIEW LN FAIRVIEW CT N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 560 82 3080 4 9 7 3
199900266 FANNO CREEK LP FANNO CRE CT E 0 FANNO CRE DR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 550 82 3117
199900267 GARRETT ST ASH AV N 0 CRESMER DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 690 82 3127 1 6 0
199900268 GENTLEWOODS D ASHFORD ST N 0 ASHFOIID ST N 150 SE LNMNN FLEX 150 82 850 3 2 1 8
199900269 ' GREENLEAF CT GREENS WY E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 264 82 1232 4 9 7 6 '
199900270 GREENFIELD DR RIDGEFIEL LN N 455 BENCHVIEW TR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 765 82 4973 7 4 S
199900273 KENT PL CUL-DE-SA E 0 GREENLAND OR E 0 SE LNMNI l FLEX 440 82 1760 1 1 2 0
199900274 LEAH TE END E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 585 82 3218 i 3 1 q •
159900275 LIDEN DR WILTON AV E 165 MARCIA DR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 905 82 4978
199900276 LUKAR CT ASCENSION DR E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 195 82 748 tl b b 3 i
199900277 MILLEN/94TH CT MILLEN OR N 0 MILLEN DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 240 82 1120 6 0 3 5
199900278 MISTLETOE DR ASCENSION DR N 0 ESSEX DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 255 82 1318 5 3 9 0
199900279 MISTLETOE DR ASCENSION DR N 0 HILLSHIRE DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1615 82 8883 1 3 1 7 7 5
199900280 MISTLETOE DR BENCHVIEW CT N 0 ALPINE N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1065 82 6035
199900281 MURDOCK ST 103 RD AV E 0 98 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1470 82 5390
Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cast assumptions.
All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed.
Date: 4/9/99 10:47:41 Page 6 of 8 2 5 3 0 +
Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 2 6 4 6 •
TIGARD ENGINEERING 4 3 2 0
City of Tigard
a1o.~
Costs Updated: 12/9198 1 2 9 3
Pave Length Prelim 3 •9 7
Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO (n) PCI Est S 3 4 5 3
199900282 NORTHVIEW DR 140 TH TE E 320 MARCIA DR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 460 82 2530
199900283 OAK ST 71 ST AV E 0 69 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 635 82 2646 3 1 6 3
199900284 OAKTREE LN ALDERBR00 CR N 0 ALDERBROO DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 810 82 4320 6 7 8
199900285 OXALIS TE ASCENSION DR N 0 END N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 180 82 810 6 8 8
199900286 RACELY PL LEAH TE N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 235 82 1293 1 8 9 8
199900287 RIDGEFIELD LN END E 0 WILMINGTO LN E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 85 82 397 1 a 4 3
199900288 RIDGEFIELD LN WILMINGTO LN N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 740 82 3453
199900289 ROCKINGHAM DR END E 0 132 NO AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 730 82 3163 9 2 3 6
199900293 STARVIEW DR END E 0 END E 170 SE LNMNN FLEX 170 82 878 5 6 0
199900294 TALON LN AERIE DR E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 125 82 688 1 3 6 0 •
199900295 TANGELA CT 95 TH AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 335 82 1898 1 0 8 5 -
199900296 TANOAK CT BRIM PL E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 335 82 1843 2 0 9 7
199900297 TERRACE TRAILS CUL-DE-SA N 0 115 TH AV N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1600 82 9236 1 7 9 8
199900299 VARNS ST 72 NO AV E 550 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 140 82 560
199900300 WAGONER PL MISTLETOE DR E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 255 82 1360 1 1 d 7
199900301 WALNUT LN ASCENSION OR E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 210 82 1085 2 b 6 0
199900302 WATKINS PL CUL-DE-SA E 0 WATKINS AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 370 82 2--097 2 0 5 6
199900303 WELLINGTON PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 ROCKINGHA DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 415 82 1798 1 0 5 •0.
199900304 WHITEHALL LN 135 TH AV E 0 BROADMOOR PL E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 250 82 1167 2 3 3 3
199900305 WHITECEDAR PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 BENCHVIEW TR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 520 82 2860 2 4 9 7
199900306 WILMINGTON LN END N 0 RIDGEFIEL LN N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 475 82 2058
199900307 WINTERLAKE CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 WINTERLAK OR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 225 82 1050 1 8 3 0 3 3
199900308 WOODSHIRE LN MORNINGST DR E 0 FERNRIDGE TE E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 560 82 2333 9 3 5
199900309 122 NO CT KATHERINE ST N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 535 82 2497 1 3 7 5 '
199900310 123 RD AV WALNUT ST N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 340 82 183033 9 3 0 .
199900311 123 RD TE GAARDE ST N 0 AERIE DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 170 82 935 a 5 0
199900312 124 TH AV AERIE DR E 0 END E 0 SE' LNMNN FLEX 250 82 1375 2 7 0 0
199900313 129 TH AV MORNINGST OR N 0 END N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 180 82 930
199900314 133 RD AV BENISH ST N 0 BENISH ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 150 82 850 1 5 2 2 '
199900317 71 ST AV PACIFIC HW N 0 SPRUCE ST N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 450 82 2700 9 3 3
199900318 71 ST AV SPRUCE ST N 0 PINE ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 415 82 1522 3 1 1 7
199900319 71 ST AV OAK ST N 0 MAPLELEAF ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 400 82 933 2 4 7 4 1 5
199900320 FIR LP 72 NO AV E 0 72 NO AV E 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 935 82 3117
Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions.
All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed.
F M, 91 no
5800•
Date: 419199 10:47:41
Page 7 of 8 tl 3 E 5 1
Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 1 4 3 0
TIGARD ENGINEERING
City of Tigard 4 0 2 3 -
Costs Updated: 12/9198 3 4 1 3
223.
Pave Length Prelim -
Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO (ft) PCI Est S 9 3 0 9 .
199900321 GREENLEAF TR SUMMERFIE OR E 0 GREENS WY E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1220 82 5800 4 3 4 7 .
199900322 AERIE DR TALON LN E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1510 83 8305 5 0 3 4
199900323 BLUE GUM CT HILLSHIRE DR N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 260 83 1430
199900325 FANNO CREEK CT FANNO CRE LP N 0 FANNO CRE DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 710 83 4023 1 0 a ,
199900326 KABLE ST HOODVIEW OR E 0 100TH AV E 330 SE LNMNN FLEX 640 83 3413- I 1 1 0 2 2
3 7 7 3
199900328 GAARDE ST 121 ST AV E 165 118TH CT E 0 SE CNMNt• FLEX 610 86 2237 '
199900329 SUMMERCREST D NORTH DAK ST E 0 121 ST AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1729 83 9309 2 3 8 3 •
199900330 WALNUT ST 124 TH PL E 0 122 NO AV E 0 SE CNMN~ FLEX 1003 86 .4347 < 0 7 0 , ~
199900332 WALNUT ST 116 TH AV E 0 112TH AV E 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 1162 86 5034 3 6 5 0 •
199900333 72 ND AV DARTMOUTH ST N 0 CLINTON ST N 0 SE CNMNN FLEX 465 86 4108
19990033a COPPER CREEK C RIVERWOOD LN N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1945 83 11021 3 5
199900336 88 TH AV REILING ST N 0 END N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 130 84 737 0
199900337 89 TH PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 550 SE LNMNN FLEX 550 84 2383 1 2 0 0
199900339 AMBIANCE PL GENESIS LP N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 460 84 2070 1 6 0 0
199900342 FALCON RISE OR MORNING H OR E 0 MORNING H DR E 730 SE MNMNf FLEX 730 86 3650 2 8 7 &
199900343 FANNO CREEK DR 80 TH CT E 145 FANNO CRE PL .E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 165 84 935 2 0 9 4
199900344 FANNO CREEK DR FANNO CRE CT E 0 COLONY CR CT E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 220 84 0 1 6 4 3
199900345 FERN ST 138 TH AV E 225 CITY LIMI E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 400 84 1200
199900347 GREENLEAF TR GREENS WY W 470 GREENS WY W 870 SE LNMNN FLEX 400 84 1600 1 1 1 3 3 _
199900349 KNOLL DR HALL BL E 0 HUNZIKER ST E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 785 84 2878 1 8 4 3 _
199900350 LAKEWOOD CT IRONWOOD LP N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 370 84 2094 1 6 2 3
199900351 MARA CT CUL•DE-SA E 0 79 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 290 84 1643 1 2 3 8 ,
199900352 MILTON CT BONITA RD N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 1520 84 10133 6 4 0 .
199900353 MINT PL BOXELDER ST E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 335 84 1843
199900354 MOUNTAIN RIDGE CUL-DE-SA E 0 134 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 295 84 1623 d 0
199900355 NOVA CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 GENESIS LP N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 275 84 1238 3 6 5 5 S
199900356 PICKS CT 103 RD AV E 125 SERENA WY E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 120 84 640 1 0 6 0
199900357 PICKS CT SERENA WY E 0 SERENA WY E 200 SE LNMNN FLEX 200 64 800 7 9 3 .
199900358 REILING ST 88 TH AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 645 84 3655 6 4 0
199900359 SYLVAN CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 SERENA WY N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 265 B4 1060 0 9 8
199900360 TIGARD ST TIEDEMAN AV E 0 TIEDEMAN AV E 170 SE MNMIN FLEX 170 86 792 1 0 3 4 1 # t
199900365 WILLOWBROOK 01 END E 0 109 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 120 84 64(
199900368 100 TH AV LADY MARI OR N 140 MURDOCK ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 845 84 3098
Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings. engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions.
All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed.
Date• »i9i99 10:47:41 Page 8 of 8
Project Candidate Summary Worksheet
TIGARD ENGINEERING 0 '
City of Tigard
Costs Updated: 1219/98 1 0 5.0
-
Pave Length Prelim 2 0 9 4
Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO (ft) PCI Eat S 2 1 ' 1 5
1999000371 69 TH AV HAMPTON ST N 0 HAMPTON ST N 175 SE LNMIN FLEX 175 84 1050 6 8 8 5 ,
199900372 ASHBURY LN SWENDON LP E 0 SWENDON LP E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 370 85 2094 2 1 4 5
199900373 FERNRIDGE TE END N 0 MORNINGST DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 470 85 2115
199900374 WAVERLY DR 92 ND AV E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1215 85 6885 1 0 2 3
199900376 GAARDE ST 110 TH AV E 0 110 TH AV E 330 SE CNMIN FLEX 330 88 2145 1 9 9 '
199900377 HAMPTON ST 72 NO AV E 0 70 TH AV E 0 SE CNMIT FLEX 685 88 5023 1 3 2 0
199900379 BASSWOOD CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 IRONWOOD LP N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 352 86 1995 2 9 4 7
199900380 BOXELDER ST MINT PL N 0 ESSEX DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 240 86 1320 6 7 4 5 ,
199900381 CHIMNEY RIDGE C MORNING H DR E 0 131 ST AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 520 86 2947 1 5 3 0 .
199900382 ESSEX DR HILLSHIRE OR N 0 BOXELDER ST N 170 SE LNMNN FLEX 1590 86 8745
199900383 FANNO CREEK LP CUL•DE-SA E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 270 SE LNMNN FLEX 270 86 1530 3 8 8
199900384 MARCIA DR 139 TH AV E 100 LIDEN OR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 725 86 3988 2 3 7 p
199900386 118 TH CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 SPRINGW00 OR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 475 86 2376 1 5 9 d
/99900387 FAIRVIEW CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 FAIRVIEW LN N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 355 88 1598 7 9 3
199900389 WEAVER WY FANNO CRE DR E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 140 88 793 4 4 6 0 4
Q ~
1,3752•,
1b8114•
110983•
1;4329•
131715•
247415•
0 3 1 4 1
44604
1094773
Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions.
All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed.
Nil
CI-fl' OF TIGARD
MARCH a. 1999
cAPIiAIR OV~MENT
PROGRAM u0"VIRVIIW
IFY 1999--2000
Appendix li
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Tigard
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Page Number
Background I
Process I
Funding . 2
Policy Issues 2
Program Areas 2
Pavement Major Maintenance Program 2
The Speed Hump Program 3
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program 3
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program 3
Major Street Capital Improvement Program 3
Bridge Replacement Program 3
Surface Water Management Funding Program 4
Storm Drainage Capital Improvement Program 4
Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Program 4
Neighborhood SewerExtension Program 4
Parks Program 4
Water System Improvement Program
Program Highlights 4
Street Projects 4
Drainage Projects 7
Other projects 7
Proposed Priority Areas for FY 1999-2000 8
What's Next? 9
Capital Improvement Program Overview
APPENDIX H
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(Overview and Status Report)
March 4, 1999
The summer and fall of 1998 have been subsequent fiscal years, the projects shown
extremely busy with the implemention and are tentative and are subject to change during
completion of pavement overlay and slurry the formulation process for coach specific
seal projects. In addition, the Engineering budget year. The CIP, through the adoption
Department has initiated design work on the process, therefore establishes the budget for
realignment of Walnut Street at Tiedeman each fiscal year and serves as a planning
Avenue and the reconstruction and widening document to guide the infrastructure
of 79th Avenue. Furthermore, the Engineering improvements over the following 6 years.
Department has established an ambitious
schedule for the coming months that would During each budget year's update, the
ensure timely implementation of projects revenue estimates are adjusted, the project
during the heart of the construction season cost estimates are reviewed, and the program
next spring and summer. The purpose of this and project priorities are re-evaluated based
briefing is provide an overview of the Capital on changes in City plans, citizen input, and
Improvement Program, to update the citizens additional data which may become available.
of Tigard on the accomplishments so far
during the past year and a half, and to Process
anticipate what is in store for FY 1999-2000.
The Capital Improvement Program update
Background process begins with citizen involvement
through the Citizen Involvement Teams. An
The long-term Capital Improvement Program overview of the CIP process is presented to
(CIP), initially adopted by the City Council the CIT's early in the calendar year so that
on August 23, 1994, identified projects for the entire process car. be completed and the
the 1994-95 CF-11? Program and proposed a list annual CIP budget submitted to and approved
of projects for the next 6-year period. The by City Council prior to the beginning of the
Capital Improvement Program includes next fiscal year (July 1). The CIP overview to
improvements to the streets, storm drainage, the CIT's is scheduled for the March 4, 1999
sanitary sewer, water and parks systems. The CIT meeting at the Tigard Senior Center. The
street, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer citizens are provided the opportunity to
CIP's are managed by the Engineering provide input into the process and to
Department. The Water CIP is managed by nominate projects for evaluation and possible
the Public Works Department, and the Parks inclusion into the program. This opportunity
CIP is managed jointly by the Planning and will be provided in the April CIT meeting.
Engineering Departments. For example, in previous years, there has
i been strong interest in pedestrian walkway
The Capital Improvement Program is updated projects and on installation of traffic calming
1 each year, and is reviewed and approved by devices, primarily speed humps. The Speed
the City Council as part of the yearly budget Hump program and specific pedestrian
process. While the program lists projects for
Capital Improvement Program Overview
Page 1 of9 APPENDIX If
walkway improvements resulted directly the respective systems. System development
from CIT participation in the process. charges collected for the parks must be used
for the acquisition, development, and
After input from the CIT's, other citizens and expansion of additional recreation spaces and
staff, the Capital Improvement Program is facilities.
prepared and submitted to the Planning
Commission for review and comment. The Policy Issues
Planning Commission typically provides
another opportunity for public comment on In the past, it has generally been City policy
the proposed plan. After review by the not to use City funds for projects outside the
Planning Commission, the plan with city limits. Some of the key streets that lie
subsequent modifications, if any, is partially outside City limits include Gaarde
submitted, with Commission Street, Walnut Street, and 121st Avenue.
recommendation, to the City Council for These streets are major collectors and will
review and approval. Council may make need to be addressed in the next few years,
additional modifications to the plan during its regardless of jurisdiction.
review and approval process. The approved
plan would be the approved Capital Since the City has now assumed certain
Improvement Program for the next fiscal responsibilities within the Urban Service
year. Boundary through agreement with
Washington County, joint projects to improve
Funding major collectors are now being programmed
for improvements in the coming few years.
Funding Sources: The sources of revenue The 1997-98 CIP included design funding for
for funding the Capital Improvement the realignment and signalization of the
Program are the following: the gas tax, the existing dogleg configuration at the Walnut
Traffic Impact Fee, Storm Drain Fund, Street/Tiedeman Avenue intersection. This
Sanitary Sewer Fund, the park levy, park design project is nearing completion and is
system development charges, the water fund, expected to begin construction during the
and miscellaneous other funding sources. summer months in 1999. Washington County
has initiated the design work for signalization
Funding Restrictions: The gas tax can be and improvement ofthe 121 Avenue/Walnut
used for upgrading the collector and local Street intersection and approaches. This
streets within Tigard, without restriction. project would be Phase I of three phases to
However, the revenue from the gas tax is improve Walnut Street from 121St Avenue to
limited and is not sufficient to fund all the 135`h Avenue using MSTIP 3 funds. The
street improvement needs of the City. The Engineering Department is in the initial
Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) can be used only for stages of the design for the extension of
highway and transit capital improvements Gaarde Street to Walnut Street and for the
which provide additional capacity to major reconsLniction and expansion of Gaarde
transportation systems. The unrestricted Street from 12151 Avenue to Highway 99W.
funds for storm drainage and sanitary sewers Other projects to improve Tigard's major
can be used for any project. However, collectors within the City limits and the
systems development charges for water, Urban Growth Boundary will be considered
sanitary and storm sewers must be expended in the next few years.
on projects that provide additional capacity to
Capita! Improvement Program Overview
Page 2 of 9 AI'1'1?NDIX 11
Program Areas overview presented during the February C1T
meeting. The streets that are to receive the
Pavement Major Maintenance Program speed humps this year will be selected during
(PMMP): This is a program of corrective and the next month or two for implementation in
preventative maintenance on all the paved the spring and summer of 1999.
streets in Tigard. It addresses those streets
that can still benefit from corrective or Storm Drainage Major Maintenance
preventative action. Those streets that cannot Program (SDMMP): This grogram
be rejuvenated through this program are addresses minor drainage problems requiring
eligible for reconstruction. There is currently more than normal maintenance effort. The
a backlog of $1,500,000 in convective funding for this program is typically
overlays, repairs, and slung seals. The typical established at $40,000 each fiscal year. The
funding for this program is $250,000 to SDMMP is expected to be a continuing
$300,000 per year. program in future years.
The Speed Hump Program: This program is Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance
a sub-element of the Comprehensive Traffic Program (SSMMP): This program is
Calming Program which is currently being typically established at $40,000 per fiscal
developed. The Comprehensive Traffic year to contract out sewer repair projects that
Calming Program will analyze streets as part are beyond the repair capabilities of the
of a network to determine what traffic Public Works Department. This program will
calming measures may be appropriate to resolve existing sanitary sewer problems by
reduce motor vehicle speeds without contracting out the repairs to fully equipped
adversely impacting other streets in the licensed contractors and is expected to be a
network. During the development of the continuing program in future years.
Comprehensive Traffic Calming Program, the
existing Speed Hump Program will continue Major Street Capital Improvement
to provide funding for installation of speed Program: This program reconstructs and
humps on streets that have clearly expands streets within Tigard. It addresses
demonstrated the need for installation of those streets that have substantially
these traffic calming devices. The streets are deteriorated, are beyond normal corrective
selected using strictly applied ranking criteria maintenance, and are in urgent need of
based on traffic studies to determine motor reconstruction. It also provides additional
vehicle speed and volumes on each of these capacity on those streets that are in need of
streets. The funding level for this program is widening to accommodate increase in traffic.
$45,000 for 100% City funded installation, Projects are normally funded either through
and $15,000 to be applied on a cost-sharing the gas tax or through Traffic Impact Fees.
basis with residents paying for 50% of the An3ong the streets that have been funded
cost. Because of limited contractor interest under this program are Main Street,
and extremely high bid submittals, in-house Commercial Street, 130th Avenue and
a Public Works street crews arc now installing Winterlake Bridge.
s these speed humps at significantly lower
costs. To allow the Public Works crews more [fridge Replacement Program (11131111):
flexibility in scheduling installation of speed This is a federally funded program which
humps during the spring and summer, this replaces badly deteriorated bridges
program has been accelerated with the throughout the country. Each bridge
Capital Improvement Program Oveiview
Page 3 of9 APPENDIX 11
undergoes a detailed inspection and is issued not currently served by the City. The City
a rating, which determines eligibility for the funds each project for installation of new,
program. Replacement of the qualifying sewer lines to connect to the existing system,
bridges requires 10% funding participation then establishes a reimbursement district to
from the City, and 10% from the State. The recoup the costs from the residents as they
Fanno Creek Bridges (at Grant and Tiedeman connect. The cost per resident for the
Avenues) have been replaced under this installation would obtained by dividing the
program. Tigard's bridges have been recently total construction and administrative costs by
inspected. There are currently no candidates the number of residents that can connect.
for inclusion in the program during FY 1999- Each resident would also be charged a
2000. connection fee and their fair share of the cost
at the time of connection. The program is
Surface Water Management (SWM) entirely voluntary, and residents do riot have
Funding (Water Quality/Quantity) to connect to the new sewer line unless they
Program: Projects under this funding must choose to. A cap of $8,000 has been
be included in the Unified Sewerage established by City Councii for those
Agency's master plan. Since these funds are residents who connect within a year after the
collected as System Development Charges, sewer extension has been completed:
they must be used to provide additional
capacity to the drainage Systems within the Parks Program: The Parks system
City. The City's 10% participation in the development charges are used to fund the
Grant and Tiedeman bridges is funded from acquisition, development, and expansion of
this program. additional recreational spaces and facilities.
The current priority for the City is to acquire
Storm Drainage Capital Improvement park land for future development. That has
Program: This program provides funding been the primary focus during the past few
from the unrestricted (user charges) storm fiscal years.
drainage funds for improvements to Tigard's
drainage system. This program repairs the Water System Improvement Program: The
existing system, or otherwise provides funds water system development portion of the
to improve those portions of the system that charges received when new meters are sold
are not eligible for S WM funding. and installed must be used only for capacity
related projects. The revenues from the
Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement charges for use of water provide funds for the
Program: This program is similar to the operations of the Water Department and for
storm drainage program in that the Sanitary any improvements or repairs to the system
Sewer Fund consists of System Development that may be required.
Charges and unrestricted funds. The
unrestricted funds are used for system Program Highlights
improvements or repairs while (lie restricted
funds must be used for capacity related The following are the highlights of the
improvements. Capital Improvement Program Projects
accomplished in calendar year 1998 and in
Neighborhood Sewer Extension frog,-am: Fiscal Year 1998-99 to date.
This program takes a proactive approach to
extending sewer service into areas that arc
Capital Improvement I'lop-am Oveivievv
Page 4 of 9 APPENDIX H
Street Projects
August and completed most of the work
1998 Pavement Major Maintenance by mid-December. The remaining work
Program (PMMP): The PMMP is an will be completed in January.
annual program of corrective and
preventive maintenance on all paved Slurry Seals: A slurry seal is a
streets in the City. There was a backlog of preventative treatment to rejuvenate
$1,500,000 at the beginning of FY 1997- streets with minor cracks that do not
98 in corrective overlay, repairs, and require removal and replacement of the
slurry seals. Each year, additional streets existing asphaltic concrete pavement. The
with an estimated $200,000 in pavement following streets were selected to receive
upgrade requirements, are added to the this preventative treatment: Alderbrook
backlog as the overall street network ages Drive, Summerfield Drive, Bond Street,
and deteriorates. Approximately $300,000 Churchill Way, 801h Avenue, Genesis
was expended in pavement upgrade Loo, Pathfinder Way, Terrace Trails,
projects during FY 1997-98. 118' Avenue, 92nd Avenue, Heidi Court,
Approximately $500,000 was allocated in Leslie Court, and-Dawn Court.
FY 1998-99 for the PMMP. Because of Approximately 17,000 lineal feet (3.2
the relatively large amount of funding miles) of slurry seal was applied on these
available this fiscal year, the PMMP was streets. California Pavement Maintenance
divided into two phases of approximately Company, Inc. began work in August and
$250,000 each. Phase 1 was completed in completed most of the work by mid-
calendar year 1998. Phase 2 will be December. The remaining work has since
constructed during the late spring and been completed.
early summer 1999. This division of
projects into two phases should ensure The Speed Hump Program: This
good bids and construction activity in the program installs speed humps in minor
months prior to July 1999. The PMMP for collector and residential streets to reduce
1999-2000 will further continue the traffic speeds. Due to high prices
pavement upgrade work through the entire submitted by contractors, this year's
summer. program was performed by the Public
Works Department. Installation of speed
The projects included under Phase 1 were humps on 115`' Avenue, Ventura Court,
basically categorized under pavement 901h Avenue, Baylor Street, North Dakota
overlay and slurry seals. The following Street and 103'd Avenue were completed
are the projects completed under Phase I during the summer months of 1998. The
in calendar year 1998: residents of 103`d Avenue were the first
City residents to take advantage of the
Pavement Overlay: There was 50% cost-sharing option made available
approximately 4,050 feet (0.8 mile) of each year in the CIP.
pavement overlay placed on the following
streets: Scott Court, Center Street, Bell Bonita Road Improvements: This
Court, 82nd Avenue, Nimbus Avenue, project is split into three phases, the first
I iampton Street, Highland Drive, and two of which have been completed:
Tiedeman Avenue. Bcnge Construction
Company, Inc. began construction in Phase I - Utilities relocation: Construction
Capital Improvement Program Overview
Page 5 of9 APPENDIX 11
. .
Milli
began in January 1998 and was completed service performed by David Evans and
in March 1998 by Marshall Associated Associates. Construction work began in
Contractors, Inc. The scope of this phase September: The Contractor experienced
included relocation of the existing unforeseen weather conditions and was
electrical conduits from above ground to unable to meet the CDBG deadline of
underground. An 18-inch steel pipe casing December 3151. The project deadline was
was required in the area where conduits extended to February 14, 1999, and the
have to cross the railroad and was contractor was able to complete the
installed by boring under the railroad project within the extended deadline.
tracks.
79`h Avenue Improvements: This street
Phase 11- Railroad Crossing and Flashing is classified as a minor collector road per
Light Signal Installations: Phase II was the Comprehensive Plan Transportation
designed and constructed by Willamette & Map. The project will improve the
Pacific (W&P) Railroad. The scope of this existing sanitary sewer and drainage
phase included replacement of the systems and widen 79 h Avenue from
rubberized railroad track crossing with Durham Road to Bonita Road. Century
concrete material and installation of a new West Engineering Corp. has been selected
crossing signal system. Construction of to finish the design. A neighborhood
this phase began in August and was meeting will be conducted in January to
completed in October. obtain public input into the design process
and to gain public support for the project.
Phase III - Street Widening: Phase III Construction funding has not yet been
includes widening of the street to full identified for the project; however, this
width, and requires right of way project would be a candidate for funding
acquisition and temporary construction under a future road bond issue.
easements to accommodate that
expansion. This is an in-house design Greenburg Road/217 Overcrossing
project and is scheduled to advertise for Widening: This project is a joint effort
bids in mid-February 1999. All necessary between Washington County and the City,
right-of-way, construction easement and and was constructed to improve traffic
railroad permits have been obtained. circulation on Greenburg Road in the
Construction is anticipated by mid-Apri l Washington Square Mall area. The project
1999 with project completion expected by is primarily funded via MSTIP 2 funds
the end of August. with an additional $400,000 in federal
funding. The City's share of the federally
91" Avenue Widening: The widening of funded portion is 10.275%. The project
9151 Avenue between Greenburg Road and widened Greenburg Road over Highway
Lincoln Street is a Community 217 and added a northbound and
Development Block Grant (CDBG) southbound lane in this area. ODOT
project. The scope of work is widening of provided the project design and
the existing street to local street standards. construction management. Construction
Construction of curb, sidewalk, water and began in February and was completed by
stone drainage is also included in the the end of November.
improvcrnent. This is an in-house design
project with right-of-way acquisition
Capital Improvement Program Overview
Page 6 of 9 APP!?NI)I If
1
Walnut Street and Tiedeman Avenue problems. The Pinebrook Street project
Intersection Realignment: Walnut Street was awarded to HPS Construction, Inc.
has been proposed for realignment to and the View Terrace project was
correct a dogleg configuration with awarded to Gelco Construction, Inc. The
Tiedeman Avenue and Fonner Street. The design was completed in-house in 1997.
project is now being designed by Murray, Construction began in January and the
Smith and Associates and will be ready projects were completed in March 1998.
for construction by July 1999. _
Other Projects
69`h Avenue Improvements: This is a
Local Improvement District (LID) project Neighborhood Sewer Extension
initiated by Specht Development, Inc. Program: This program extends sanitary
Based on a favorable preliminary sewer service into residential
evaluation report presented to Council in neigh'•.:orhoods. The City initiates and
October, Council directed the preparation completes the sewer extensions, then
of a preliminary Engineering report which recoups the total cost of the design and
was submitted to Council in February construction via creation of a
1999. DeHaas and Associates, Inc. was reimbursement district. As residents
selected to perform the preliminary connect to the new sewer line, they have
design. If the district is successfully to pay their proportionate share of the cost
formed and the project proceeds according of the line, plus the normal connection
to the established schedule, the street fee. At least 50% the property owners that
improvements would be completed by can connect to the new line must approve
November 1999. the project for the new sewer system to be
extended into a neighborhood. Council
Drainage Projects approved-a resolution reducing each
resident's share of the cost to $8,000 for
110th and Park Street Storm Drainage: those that connect within a year after
This project was originally intended to completion of the project.
widen Park Street to provide a pedestrian
path from Watkins Street to 110th This year's program included two homes
Avenue. Citizens in the neighborhood did on Hillview Street. The contractor, Miller
not want the pedestrian path installed, but and Sons, began the work in October and
requested that the City alleviate an completed the project in November.
existing drainage problem on Park_ Street
instead. The Engineering staff prepared Another project that is still under design
a the design plans in-house and bid out the includes nine houses on 1061h Avenue and
j project for construction. Wystan Brown Johnson Street and requires a creek
Excavation, Inc. began construction in crossing. Construction will begin in July
i May and completed the project in 1999 to meet the construction window
October. within the creek required by the State.
a
3 Pinebrook Street and View Terrace: Tigard Street Parking Lot: The site is
a These two relatively small projects were located on Tigard Street, near the
intended to upgrade the existing drainage intersection of Tigard Street and Main
systems and alleviate periodic flooding Street. To provide additional parking for
Capital Improvemcnt Program Overview
Page 7 of 9 APPENDIX If
downtown shoppers, the project includes Tigard Vertical Net: Establishment of five
construction of 14 regular spaces and 1 additional Bench marks with elevations
disabled space with landscaping and and monumentation.
lighting installed throughout the parking.
MH Construction, Inc. began the work in Traffic Studies
October and substantially completed the Over 100 traffic studies were conducted on streets
project by the end of December. in Tigard and in the Washington County urban
HighTor Reservoir: A paved pathway services agreement area. The-studies were
needed to be installed for maintenance conducted for many different reasons. Studies
access and to direct storm water from the were performed to determine the needs and
reservoir site to the street. Construction priority of streets where speed humps have been
began in June and was completed in July. requested, and to determine their effectiveness
after speed humps were installed. Studies were
Fanno Creek Trails: Projects in the done to evaluate the need for new or existing
proposed Fanno Creek trail system traffic control devices (signs and pavement
include seven greenway trail segments markings). Regularly scheduled traffic studies
with the first segment beginning at North were done to maintain current data in areas under
Dakota Street and the last segment ending development. When speeding problems were
at Main Street. Two trail segments were identified, information was provided to the police
constructed during calendar year 1998. department to assist in enforcement. Many
Segment 1 (North Dakota Street / Tigard citizens, developers, realtors, and consulting
Street trail) and Segment 6A (Asti engineers ask for this data on a regular basis.
Avenue/Fanno Creek trail). Construction Most of these 72-hour studies began on Tuesdays
of the other segments are delayed until and ended on Fridays, using Hi-Star magnetic
calendar year 1999 to allow time for imaging equipment. Data gathered includes
obtaining wetland permits and acquisition volumes, truck percentages, and speeds. The
of permanent easement. information obtained from the studies provide the
Survey projects: Topographic survey basis for decisions on future street improvements,
work for in-house design projects was and for design and implementation of traffic
performed throughout the calendar year. calming devices to reduce high vehicle speeds on
Other survey projects included the minor collectors and residential streets.
following: Proposed Priority Areas For FY
• Encroachment survey for the area 1999-2000
northwest of Cook Park.
The preventative and corrective actions
a Albertson's lot line adjustment for necessary to preserve and extend the life of
Park acquisition. the various streets in Tigard will continue to
be a high priority cacti fiscal year.
• Parking lot staking for the Balloon
festival. • Street reconstruction will again be considered
for those streets that are beyond normal
e 107th Avenue right of way research. maintenance.
Capital Improvement Program Overview
Page 8 of9 APPENDIX If
• The realignment and signalization of the • The Parks Program will continue with
Walnut Street/Tiedeman Avenue acquisition of properties for future park
intersection will be a construction priority development. In addition, the construction
during FY 1999-2000. In addition, design of several bike/pedestrian paths is
of Gaarde Street to provide a connection scheduled for summer of 1999. Design
to Walnut Street and to widen and work and compliance with permit
reconstruct the two-lane section from requirements are currently underway and
121st Avenue to Highway 99W will be a are nearing completion,
major project during calendar year 1999.
• Water projects for maintenance and
• The preparatory work to enable placement expansion of the system will again be
of a road bond issue on the ballot in the continued in the next fiscal year.
year 2000 will be a major priority in
calendar year 1999. The establishment of What's Next?
a task force to oversee the process and
selection of projects for that road bond The opportunity for citizens of Tigard to
issue will be the initial steps in this effort. nominate projects for consideration in the FY
1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program
• Traffic calming efforts will continue to be will be provided in this meeting and in the
a high priority for the next fiscal year. The April CIT meeting. For those that cannot
development of a Comprehensive Traffic attend the April meeting, the City will accept
Calming Program will be a major priority written comments or suggestions at any time
this calendar year. in the process prior to approval by City
Council. The final project listing will be a
• The City Council has indicated a strong combination of City staff input and citizen
interest in providing street lighting in unlit recommendations. The proposed program will
areas of the City where street lights are be presented to the Planning Commission in
required to enhance pedestrian safety or to early June and to City Council during the
deter crime. The establishment of a June 22, 1999 Business Meeting. The
program to provide such lighting will be a approved plan will be ready for
priority in the corning fiscal year. implementation-July 1, 1999.
• Minor repairs to the storm drainage and
sanitary sewer systems will again be Foi<mbre:informafion;please ca11_or write to
performed through the Storm Drainage the following: .
Major Maintenance and Sanitary Sewer Vannie T. Nguyen, -P.E.
Repair Programs. Engineering Manager
E-mail: vannie@ci.tigard.or.us
• The Neighborhood Sewer Extension (503) 639-4171-Ext. 375
Program will be continued for those
residents that indicate a strong interest in Agustin P. Duenas, P.E.
connecting to the City's sanitary sewer City Engineer
system. We have several extensions that (503) 639-4171 Ext. 378
are currently under consideration for E-mail: gus@ci.tigard.or.us
installation during the sunnier months of
1999. Mailing
Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Capital Improvement Program Overview Tigard, Oregon 97223
Page 9 of 9 APPENDIX If
FY 1999 - 2000
Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PMMP)
• Slurry Seal
70th Ave 69th To Taylor's Ferry Road
94th Ave Lakeside To End
106th Ave North Dakota To Black Diamond
108th Ave North Dakota To End
108th Ave Black Diamond Way To Cut De Sac
108th Ct Black Diamond Way To Cut Dc Sac
115th North Dakota To Springwood
121st Scholls To Springwood
Alderbrook Ct Summerfield 'fo End
Alderbrook PI Summerfield To End
Black Diamond 106th To 70' West Of Ponderosa Place
Johnson Grant To 99w
Karol Ct Katherine To Cut De Sac
Lakeside Drive Alderfrook To 98th
Marie Ct. 128th To Cut De Sac
North Dakota Scholls To Springwood
North Dakota Greenburg To 400' East Of Greenburg
Pathfinder Ct Walnut To Cut De Sac
Ponderosa PI Black Diamond Way To Cut De Sac
Summerfield Ct 92nd To End
Tigard Drive Summercrest To 115th
Walnut City Limits To Grant
Asphaltic Concrete Overlay
107`h Park street to Cook Lane
Bonitia Road 72nd to the City's Limits
Scoffins Street Main street to Ash Ave
McKenzie Street 99W south to end
Meadow Street Tiedcman to end
APPENDIX I
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gus Duenas, City Engineer Ala.
FROM: Wayne Lowry, Director of Finance
RE: CIP funding projections
DATE: March 29, 1999
We have prepared the estimates for CIP for each fund for 1999/00. These estimates
are preliminary and are based on the budget as requested by Departments. The
requested budget has not yet been reviewed by the City Manager. We therefore expect
the numbers to change.
Sanitary Sewer 3,000,000
Storm Sewer 900,000
Water Fund 2,000,000
State Gas Tax 545,000
Traffic Impact Fee 3,800,000
TIF Urban Services 900,000
Parks SDC 910,000
Underground Utility 373,000
Watei, Quality/Quantity 882,000
Water SDC 946,000
Metro Greenspace 247,000
Tree Replacement 227,000
Water CIP (Supply) 4,000,000
Park Levy CIP 218,000
Let me know if you need any further information or if you have any questions.
AppENDIX J
IFY 2000-01
Capital Improvement Pr® °am
P ND
Capital Improvement Program Overview and Status Deport
Dated March 2, 2000
CAPITAL UvffROVEMENT PROGRAM
(Overviefv and Status Report)
March 2, 2000
The surnmer and fall of 1999 have been subsequent fiscal years, the projects shown
extremely busy with the implemention and are tentative and are subject to change during
completion of pavement overlay and slurry the formulation process for each specific
seal projects. In addition, construction of the budget year. The CIP, through the adoption
Realignment and Signalization of the process, therefore establishes the budget for
Walnut/Tiedeman Intersection is well each fiscal year and serves as a planning
underway and is scheduled for completion in document to guide the infrastructure.
the summer of 2000. Furthermore, the improvements over the following 6 years.
Engineering Department has again established
an ambitious schedule for the coming months During each budget year's update, the revenue
that would ensure timely implementation of estimates are adjusted, the project cost
projects during the heart of the construction estimates are reviewed, and the program and
season next spring and summer. The purpose project priorities are re-evaluated based on
of this briefing is provide an overview of the changes in City plans, citizen input, and
Capital Improvement Program, to update the additional data which may become available.
citizens of Tigard on the accomplishments so
far during the past year, and to anticipate what Process
is in store for FY 2000-01.
The Capital Improvement Program update
Background process begins with citizen involvement
through the Citizen Involvement Teams. An
The long-term Capital Improvement Program overview of the CIP process is presented to
(CIP), initially adopted by the City Council the CIT's early in the calendar year so that the
on August 23, 1994, identified projects for the entire process can be completed and the
1994-95 CIP Program and proposed a list of annual CIP budget submitted to and approved
projects for the next 6-year period. The by City Council prior to the beginning of the
Capital Improvement Program includes next fiscal year (July 1). The CIP overview to
improvements to the streets, storm drainage, the CIT's is scheduled for the March 2, 2000
sanitary sewer, water and parks systems. The CIT meeting at the Tigard Senior Center. The
street, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer citizens are provided the opportunity to
CIF's are managed by the Engineering provide input into the process and to nominate
Department. 1'he Water CIP is managed by projects for evaluation and possible inclusion
the Public Works Department, and the Parks into the program. This opportunity will be
CIP is managed jointly by the Planning and provided in the April CIT meeting. For
Engineering Departments. example, in previous years, there has been
strong interest in pedestrian walkway projects
The Capital Improvement Program is updated and on installation of traffic calming devices,
each year, and is reviewed and approved by primarily speed humps. The Speed Hump
the City Council as part of' the yearly budget Program and specific pedestrian walkway
process. While the program lists projects I'()[
Capital Improvcmcnl I'rogram <)vcrvicw
I'age f of 12
oil'
improvements resulted directly from CIT charges collected for the parks must be used'
participation in the process. for the acquisition, development, and
expansion of additional recreation spaces and
After input from the CIT's, other citizens and facilities.
staff, the Capital Improvement Program is
prepared and submitted to the Planning Policy Issues
Commission for review and comment. The
Planning Commission typically provides In the past, it has generally been City policy
another opportunity for public comment on not to use City funds for projects outside the
the proposed plan. After review by the city limits. Some of the key streets that lie
Planning Commission, the plan with partially outside City limits include Gaarde
subsequent modifications, if any, is Street, Walnut Street, and 121st Avenue.
submitted, with Commission These streets are major collectors and will
recommendation, to the City Council for need to be addressed in the next few years,
review and approval. Council may make regardless of jurisdiction.
additional modifications to the plan during its
review and approval process. The approved Since the City has now assumed certain
plan would be the approved Capital responsibilities within the Urban Service'
Improvement Program for the next fiscal year. Boundary through agreement with
Washington County, joint projects to improve
Funding major collectors are now being programmed
for improvements in the coming few years.
Funding Sources: The sources of revenue for The realignment and signalization of the
funding the Capital Improvement Program are existing dogleg configuration at the Walnut
the following: the gas tax, the Traffic Impact Street/Tiedeman Avenue intersection is now
Fee, Storm Drain Fund, Sanitary Sewer Fund, under construction and is expected to be
the park levy, park systern development completed in the summer of 2000.
charges, the water fund, and miscellaneous Washington County has initiated the design
other funding sources. work for signalization and improvement of
the 121 AvenuelWalnut Street intersection
Funding Restrictions: The gas tax can be used and approaches. This project is designated as
for upgrading the collector and local streets Phase 1 of three phases to improve Walnut
within Tigard, without restriction. However, Street from 12151 Avenue to 135`h Avenue
the revenue from the gas tax is limited and is using MSTIP 3 funds. The Engineering
not sufficient to fund all the street Department has contracted with engineering
improvement needs of the City. The Traffic consultant firms for design of the extension of
Impact Fee (TIP) can be used only for Gaarde Street from Quail Hollow-West to
highway and transit capital improvements Walnut Street, and for the reconstruction and
which provide additional capacity to major expansion of Gaarde Street from 12151
transportation systems. The unrestricted funds Avenue to Highway 99W.
for storm drainage and sanitary sewers can be
s
used for any project. I-lowever, systems in early 1999, City Council formed a task
development charges for water, sanitary and force to select projects for a proposed
storm sewers must be expended on projects transportation bond in the November 2000
that provide additional capacity to the general election. This task force has been
respective systems. System development meeting during the past year and conducted
Capital In1111ovement 111o.gtam Overview
Vage 2 tit 1.).
several citizen involvement meetings to solicit program is $45,000 for 100% City funded
input. The task force is expected to present installation, and $15,000 to be applied on a
recommendations to the Planning cost-sharing basis with residents paying for
Commission on April 17, 2000 and to City 50% of the cost. Because of limited contractor
Council on May 9, 2000. interest and extremely high bid submittals, in-
house Public Works street crews are now
The annexation of Walnut Island and its installing these speed humps at significantly
ancillary islands will be effective May 17, lower costs. The list of streets and the priority
2000. The transfer of jurisdiction for the rankings will be presented to the CIT's in
County roads within those islands is March. The streets that are to receive the
anticipated to occur in July. Major collectors speed humps this year will be selected during
such as Walnut Street, Gaarde Street and 121St the next month or two for implementation in
Avenue are within the Walnut Island area and the spring and summer of 2000. The early
will fall under City jurisdiction after the selection of streets to receive speed humps
transfer occurs. will allow the Public Works crews maximum
flexibility in scheduling the installations
Program Areas during the spring and summer months.
Pavement Major Maintenance Program Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program
(PMMP): This is a program of corrective and (SDMMP): This program addresses minor
preventative maintenance on all the paved drainage problems requiring more than
streets in Tigard. It addresses those streets normal maintenance effort. The funding for
that can still benefit from corrective or this program is typically established at
preventative action. Those streets that cannot $40,000 each fiscal year. The SDMMP is
be rejuvenated through this program are expected to be a continuing program in future
eligible for reconstruction. The typical years.
funding for this program is $250,000 to
$300,000 per year. Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program
(SSMMP): This program is typically
The Traffic Calming Program: The program established at $40,000 per fiscal year to
analyzes streets as part of a network to contract out sewer repair projects that are
determine what traffic calming measures may beyond the repair capabilities of the Public
be appropriate to reduce motor vehicle speeds Works Department. This program will resolve
without adversely impacting other streets in existing sanitary sewer problems by
the network. It is in the process of being contracting out the repairs to fully equipped
developed and should be completed during licensed contractors and is expected to be a
mid-2000. The Speed Hump Program is a continuing program in future years.
component of the Comprehensive Program.
Under the Speed Hump Program, speed Major Street Capital Improvement
humps are installed on streets that have Program: This program reconstructs and
clearly demonstrated the need for installation expands streets within Tigard. It addresses
of these traffic calming devices. The streets those streets that have substantially
are selected using strictly applied ranking deteriorated, are beyond normal corrective
criteria based on traffic studies to determine maintenance, and are in urgent recd of
motor vehicle speed and volumes on each of reconstruction. It also provides additional
these streets. The funding level for this capacity rni those streets that are in need of'
Capital Improvement Ptot!wm Ooverview
Page 3 of 12
4
widening to accommodate increase in traffic. Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement
Projects are normally funded either through Program: This program is similar to the storm
the gas tax or through Traffic Impact Fees. drainage program in that the Sanitary Sewer
Recent projects funded through the Traffic Fund consists of System Development
Impact Fee include the reconstruction and Charges and unrestricted funds. The
expansion of Bonita Road from the Bridge to unrestricted funds are used for system
the railroad tracks, and the ongoing improvements or repairs while the restricted
Walnut/Tiedeman Intersection Realignment funds must be used for capacity related
project. improvements.
Bridge Replacement Program (IiBRR): Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program:
This is a federally funded program which This program takes a proactive approach to
replaces badly deteriorated bridges extending sewer service into areas that are not
throughout the country. Each bridge currently served by the City. The City funds
undergoes a detailed inspection and is issued each project for installation of new sewer
a rating, which determines eligibility for the lines to connect to the existing system, then
program. Replacement of the qualifying establishes a reimbursement district to recoup
bridges requires 10% funding participation the costs from the residents as they connect.
from the City, and 10% from the State. The The cost per resident for the installation
Fanno Creek Bridges (at Grant and Tiedeman would obtained by dividing the total
Avenues) have been replaced under this construction and administrative costs by the
program. Tigard's bridges have been recently number of residents that can connect. Each
inspected. There are currently no candidates resident would also be charged a connection
for inclusion in the program during FY 2000- fee and their fair share of the cost at the time
01. of connection. The program is entirely
voluntary, and residents do not have to
Surface Water Management (SWM) Funding connect to the new sewer line unless they
(Water Quality/Quantity) Program: Projects choose to. An incentive program has been
under this funding must be included in the established by City Council subsidizing the
Unified Sewerage Agency's master plan. payment of the fair share above $8,000 up to
Since these funds are collected as System a maximum of $15,000 (a maximum subsidy
Development Charges, they must be used to of $7,000) for those residents who connect
provide additional capacity to the drainage within a year after the sewer extension has
Systems within the City. The City's 10% been completed.
participation in the Grant and Tiedeman
bridges is funded from this program. Parks Program: The Parks system
development charges are used to fund the
Stonn Drainage Capital Improvement acquisition, development, and expansion of
Program: This program provides finding additional recreational spaces and facilities.
from the unrestricted (user charges) storm The current priority for the City is to acquire
drainage finds for improvements to Tigard's park land for future development. That has
drainage system. This program repairs the been the primary focus during the past few
existing system, or othctlvisc provides funds fiscal years.
to improve those portions of the system that
are not eligible (or SWM funding. Water System Improvement Program: The
water system dcvelopiiient portion of the
Capital improvement Proi;ram Overview
Pai;e 4 ol' 12
mime
charges received when new meters are sold of $1,500,000 at the beginning of FY 1997-98
and installed must be used only for capacity in corrective overlay, repairs, and slurry seals.
related projects. The revenues from the After establishment of the Pavement
charges for use of water provide funds for the Management System (PMS) in 1998, the PMS
operations of the Water Department and for reported a backlog for corrective and
any improvements or repairs to the system preventative maintenance of almost
that may be required. $2,700,000. The slurry seals alone are over
$1,000,000 of that total. As time passes and
Program highlights the street network deteriorates, an additional
$200,000 worth of corrective and preventative
The following are the highlights of the Capital maintenance work is added to the backlog
Improvement Program Projects accomplished each year, if the pavement rejuvenation work
in calendar year 1999 and in Fiscal Year identified is not performed in a timely
1999-2000 to date. manner.
Street Projects This program has been severely hampered by
the lack of increase in the State Gas tax over
The street projects in the CIP are typically the past few years. The City typically receives
funded through the State Gas Tax and the $500,000 in gas tax revenues each year for
countywide Traffic Impact Fee. Several various street projects. Some of these funds
projects were initiated using both of these are set aside for design and construction of
funding sources. However, the funds available traffic calming measures, pedestrian
are limited and are not sufficient to address walkways and sidewalk extensions, traffic
the problems in most of the major streets in studies, design of street projects, and minor
Tigard. It has been ten years since the last street-related improvements. This leaves
transportation bond measure provided funds approximately $300,000 typically available
to upgrade some of the City streets. The City for corrective and preventative maintenance
Council appointed a Transportation Bond each year. This amount is not sufficient to
Task Force to select projects for a proposed substantially reduce the backlog of work that
transportation bond measure in the year 2000. we have already identified as urgently needed.
The projects under consideration include In addition, the state gas tax provides funding
reconstruction and expansion of certain major for our routine street maintenance. As labor
streets, construction of sidewalks and bike and materials costs increase each year, we can
lanes, safety-related improvements, and expect the amount that we typically receive
installation of street lighting in certain areas. each year for corrective and preventative
The Bond Task force will be presenting its maintenance to gradually decrease if the gas
recommendations to City Council in May tax package that was recently passed is not
2000. ratified in the May 2000 election.
The following are the projects initiated with The Proposed Transportation Bond (if passed)
the funding available: will address reconstruction identified in the
PMS. Some of the backlog will be reduced in
1999 Pavement Major Maintenance Program that manner. However, the annual increase in
(PMMP): The PMMP is an annual program of the backlog will continue as long as the
corrective and preventive maintenance on all annual funding for pavement overlay and
paved streets in the City. Thcrc was a backlog slurry seals is not increased substantially.
Capital Improvement Program Overview
Paue 5 of 12
Pill
Because of carryover funding from FY 1997- rejuvenate streets with minor cracks
98, the sum of $500,000 was available in FY that do not require removal and
1998-99. As a result, the PMMP for that fiscal replacement of the existing asphaltic
year was divided into two phases of concrete pavement. Approximately
approximately $250,000 each. Phase 1 was 42,000 square yards of slung seal was
completed in 1998. Phase 2, which includes applied on the following streets: 70th
pavement overlay and striping, was Avenue, 94th Avenue, 106th Avenue,
substantially completed in late summer of 108th Avenue, 1080' Court, 1150'
1999. For FY 1999-2000, the amount Avenue, 164th Avenue, Alderbrook
available was drastically reduced to $233,000. Court, Alderbrook Place, Colony
Despite the reduced amount, the PMMP Place, Black Diamond Way, Karol
continued with pavement overlay and slung Court, Lakeside Drive, Marie Court,
seal applications. Ponderosa Place, Rhus Court,
Summerfield Court, Tigard Drive and
The PMMP projects completed in Wood Place. Out of these streets to be
calendar year 1999 are as follows: slurry sealed, 4 streets, Rhus Court,
Colony Place, Wood Place and 164th
Pavement Overlay - Phase H FY Avenue are located in Washington
1998-99: Approximately 5,220 feet County. Funding for work on the
(about 1 mile) of pavement overlay County roads was provided by the
was placed on the following streets: County in accordance with the Urban
68th Parkway, 69th Avenue, 70th Services Area IGA. Asphalt
Avenue, Oak Street and North Dakota Maintenance Associates began work
Street. Morse Bros., Inc. began in August and completed the slurry
construction in May and completed seal work in September. The sub-
the work in August. contractor replacing the striping on
these streets has completed the
Striping - FY 1998-99: This is a striping work on this project.
program to re-stripe City streets that
require re-delineation for safety and Pavement Overlay - FY 1999-2000:
proper channelization of traffic. This year's pavement overlay program
Streets receiving new striping durin also includes streets located in
the 1999 calendar year include: 135" Washington County. Approximately
Avenue, Walnut Street, Bull Mountain 5,840 feet (about 1 mile) of pavement
Road, Canterbury Street, Dartmouth overlay was placed on both County
Street, Tigard Drive, Redwood Lane, and City streets. The County roads
Cardinal Lane, Sequoia Parkway, 74°i receiving the overlay include 133rd
„ Avenue, Pfaffle Street, Park Street and Avenue, 162nd Avenue, Colony Place,
Watkins Street. The low bidder was Fonner Street and Roshak Road. The
a
Apply-a-Line who began the striping City streets include Bonita Road,
work in May and has most of it McKenzie Street and Scoff ns Street.
completed. The punch list items were Work performed on the County roads
completed in February 2000. was funded by the County through the
IGA. Eaglc Elsner, Inc. began
Slurry Seals - FY 1999-2000: A slurry construction in September and
seal is a preventative treatment to completed the pavement overlay work
Capital Improvement Program Overview
Page 6 of 12
in October. Striping work still initiated by Specht Development, Inc.
remains on some streets and it will be Based on a favorable preliminary
completed as weather permits. evaluation report presented to Council in
October 1998, Council directed the
The Traffic Calming Program: This preparation of a preliminary Engineering
program installs traffic-calming devices report to be submitted to Council in
on minor collector and residential streets February 1999. In March 1999, an
to reduce traffic speeds and volume. The Ordinance was approved by the Council
most popular and effective device is the to finalize the design and have the project
speed hump. Due to high prices submitted ready for construction by June. DeHaas
by contractors in 1997, Public Works & Associates, Inc. was selected to
crews have been installing speed humps perform the design and construction
with in-house street crews during the past management for the project. Bids were
2 years. This year's program installed 14 opened in May and the lowest bid was
speed humps on Grant Street, Benchview submitted by W.A. Jones, Inc.
Terrace, Summerfield Drive and North Construction begun in June and is
Dakota Street. The streets selected over substantially completed with only
the next few months will have traffic- punchlist items remain. Landscaping
calming devices installed during the work for the project will be installed and
spring and summer months of 2000. completed by the end of March 2000.
Bonita Road Improvements - Phase 3: 915 Avenue Widening: The widening of
This project was split into three phases; 91st Avenue between Greenburg Road
the first two phases were completed in and Lincoln Street is a Community
1998. Phase 1 included relocation of the Development Block Grant (CDBG)
existing electrical conduits from above project. The scope of work required
ground to underground. Phase 2 was widening of the existing street to local
designed and constructed by Willamette & street standards. Construction of curb,
Pacific (W&P) Railroad. The scope of this sidewalk, water and stornl drainage are
phase included replacement of the also included in the improvement. This is
rubberized railroad track crossing with an in-house design project with right-of-
concrete material and installation of a new way acquisition services performed by
crossing signal system. David Evans and Associates. Construction
began September 1998. The Contractor,
Phase 3 included widening of the street to D&D Concrete & Utilities, experienced
full width, and required right of way unforeseen weather conditions and was
acquisition and temporary construction unable to meet the CDBG deadline of
easements to accommodate that December 31 With the County's
expansion. This in-house design project approval of the extension of the project
was advertised for bids in April 1999. The deadline to June 1999, the project was
contract was awarded to Excel completed in April 1999.
Excavation. Construction commcnced in
mid-June and was completed in August. 79(h Avenue Improvements: This street is
classified as a minor collector in the
69"' Avenue Improvements: This is a current Comprehensive 1'1111
Local Improvement District (1_11)) project Transportation Map. The project will
Capital improvement 11rogiam overview
Page 7 of 12
improve the-existing sanitary sewer and runs in an east-west direction and
drainage systems and widen 79th Avenue provides a connection between 1215'
from Durham Road to Bonita Road. Avenue and Hwy 99W. This project is
Century West Engineering Corp. was the design of the improvements for the
selected to finish the design. A existing Gaarde Street and the design and
neighborhood meeting was conducted in construction of a new Gaarde Street
January to obtain public input into the between Walnut Street and the Quail
design process and to gain public support Hollow subdivision. The design and
for the project. Design of the project is on right-of-way acquisitions are split into two
hold awaiting Council's direction phases:
regarding typical sections for the street.
Construction funding has not yet been Phase 1- Walnut Street to the
identif ed for the project; however, this Northerly Boundary of Quail Hollow
project is a candidate for funding under Subdivision: The design work on this
the proposed transportation bond issue. phase is being performed by Century
West Engineering Corp. The design is
Walnut Street and'Tiedeman Avenue expected to be completed by May
Intersection Realignment: This project 2000.
realigns Walnut Street to correct a dogleg
configuration with Tiedeman Avenue and Phase 2 -121" Avenue to Hwy 99W:
Fonner Street. The project was designed Phase 2 is being designed by Triland
by Murray, Smith and Associates with Design Group, Inc. and is
right-of-way acquisition services approximately 35% complete. This
performed by David Evans and project is a candidate for construction
Associates. The low bidder on the project under the proposed transportation
was Benge Construction. The contractor bond.
began the construction work in August
and has most of underground utilities Embedded Crosswalk Lights: This is a
installed. Curb and sidewalk on the south pilot project to provide embedded
side of Walnut Street have also been crosswalk light installation at three
completed. The new intersection is locations: Walnut Street at Grant Avenue,
expected to be opened to public traffic in 12151 Avenue at Springwood Drive and
late-July 2000. 12151 Avenue at Katherine Street. The
design has been completed and the lights
Grant Avenue Pedestrian Improvements: at 12151 and Katherine will be installed
This project provides a pedestrian path during the next two months. The other
along Grant Avenue connecting the two locations require overlay prior to
existing walkway along Park Street with
~ b Y g installation of the lights. The embedded
School Street and providing pedestrian lights will be installed after the pavement
access to Charles F. Tigard Elementary overlay is completed and the markings
School. This project was awarded to Sight have been installed.
3 Excavation, Inc. The construction work
began in July and was completed in Lincoln Avenue Widening: The widening
September 1999. of Lincoln Avenue between Greenburg
Road and Commercial Street is a
Gam-de Street Improvements: The existing Community Development Block Grant
Gaarde Street is a Major Collector that
Capital Improvement Prograin Overview
Page 8 ol• 12
(CDBG) project. Phase 1 will construct December and was completed in January
half-street improvements along the west 2000.
side of the street including curb, sidewalk,
storm drainage and water. Right-of-way Pacific Highway & Durham Road and
has been obtained and the final design has 118" Court, Ann Court & Katherine
been completed. The project will be Street: These relatively small projects are
constructed during the next few months intended to alleviate periodic flooding
and is expected to be completed by the problems and to address minor drainage
end of June 2000. The City is currently problems requiring more than normal
applying for funding to complete the east maintenance effort. In-house design is
side of Lincoln Street, which, upon underway. Construction will be dependent
completion, will provide a fully improved upon availability of funding in the second
street in this area. half of FY 1999-2000.
Storm Drainage Projects Lincoln Avenue: The drainage system
upgrade on 91" Avenue, from Greenburg
116'h Avenue: This project intercepts the Road to Lincoln Street, was included in
existing drainage on 1151' Avenue and re- the 9151 improvement project. This project
routes the storm runoff down 1161h completes the improvements of the
Avenue to an existing creek. The existing existing drainage system in that area by
system is inadequate and cannot installing a new drainage system along
accommodate the storm runoff during Lincoln Avenue from 9151 Avenue to
heavy rains. The Engineering staff Commercial Street. Constnzction of this
prepared the design plans in-house and project will be combined with Lincoln
bid out the project for construction. Street improvement project, which will
Venture Construction, Inc. began begin in mid-March 2000.
construction in July and completed the
project in August. Thorn Street: This is a Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Hoodview Drive & Bull Mountain Road: project. This project is intended to
This project is intended to alleviate the construct a new-drainage system and to
extensive amount of stormtivater on reconstruct the existing curb and
Hoodview Drive and to divert year-round pavement to provide adequate slope for
discharge from sonic lots to the new stormwater to run into that new system.
drainage system. On Bull Mountain Construction will begin in the first week
Road, this project widens the existing of April 2000.
shoulder and installs curb to direct surface
water runoff to an existing catch basin. Sanitary Sewer Projects
The Hoodview Drive project is funded in
the FY 1999-00 CiP while the Bull Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program:
Mountain Road project is fielded by the This program extends sanitary sewer
County through the existing IGA. The service into residential neighborhoods.
design was completed in-house ill The City initiates and completes the sewer
September 1999 and the construction extensions, then recoups the total cost of
contract was awarded to I'ipc Dreams, the design and construction via creation of
Inc. Construction began in early- a rcinlburscnlcnt district. As residents
Capital Improvement Program Overvicw
I'agc9of' 12
connect to the new sewer line, they have Walnut/Tiedeman intersection
to pay their proportionate share of the cost improvement project, which is under
of the line, plus the normal connection construction by Benge Construction.
fee. At least 50% the property owners that Installation of the sewer system is
can connect to the new line must approve complete. Connection to the new
the project for the new sewer system to be sanitary sewer system will be
extended into a neighborhood. Council available in May when the street
approved an incentive program to reduce improvement project is complete.
each resident's share of the cost to $8,000
for those that connect within a year after Other Projects
completion of the project. This program
expires in October 2000, but most likely Jack Park & Englewood Park Pathways:
will be renewed prior to that time. This project removed and replaced about
1,700 feet of the existing pathways that
Six reimbursement districts were are narrow and in poor condition.
constructed this year and 85 lots were Construction began in July and was
included in these districts: completed in August by Sun Quest
Construction.
106th Avenue & Johnson Street:
Venture Construction, Inc. began the Fanno Creek Trails: Projects in the
work in June and completed the proposed Fanno Creek trail system
project in August. include seven greenway trail segments
with the first segment beginning at North
100th Avenue & Inez Street: Oregon Dakota Street and the last segment ending
Siteworks began construction in early at Main Street. Two trail segments were
September and completed the work in constructed in 1998: Segment 1 (North
October. Dakota Street / Tigard Street trail) and
Segment 6A (Ash Avenue/Fanno Creek
103rd Avenue, 104th Avenue & Del trail). Design of Segment 2 (Tigard Street
Monte Drive: Project construction by / Tideman trail) and Segment 6B (Ash
Emerald Towers began in November Avenue / Main Street trail) have been
1999. Work was completed on this completed. Wetland permits have also
project in February 2000. been obtained. Right of way acquisition
is currently underway for Segment 6B.
O'Mara Street: Construction . Construction of Segment B is expected to
performed by Crestview Construction begin in May 2000.
since November is now substantially
complete. The work was completed Survey projects: Topographic survey
and accepted in January 2000. work for in-house design projects was an
ongoing activity throughout the calendar
Beveland Street and Hermosa Way: year. Survey projects not tied to any
Viking Construction began work in design project included the following:
7 September and completed the project
in December 1999.
a Walnut island annexation.
Walnut/Tiedeman sewer
Walnut Sweet & Tiedeman Avenue: reimbursement district annexation.
This project was combined with the
Capital Improvement Program Overview
Page 10 of 12
Albertson's lot line adjustment. speeds. The information obtained from the
Canterbury property survey. studies provide the basis for decisions on
■ USA lot line adjustment to Cook future street improvements, and for design
park, and implementation of traffic calming devices
■ Johnson Street apartment lot line to reduce high vehicle speeds on minor
adjustment (under process). collectors and residential streets.
■ Partition plat for property west of
Grant Street and north of Tigard Proposed Priority Areas For FY
Street (under process). 2000-01
Locate property lines where trees
may need to be removed (14 The preventative and corrective actions
times). necessary to preserve and extend the life of
■ Review 12 partition plats, 11 the various streets in Tigard will continue to
subdivision plats and various legal be a high priority each fiscal year.
descriptions for Private
Development. Street reconstruction will again be considered
■ Establish 5 new Benchmarks with for those streets that are beyond normal
brass disc and elevations. maintenance. Some of the necessary
■ Parking lot staking for the Balloon reconstruction will be addressed through
festival. projects on the proposed transportation bond
Traffic Studies issue, if the bond issue passes.
Over 100 traffic studies were conducted on Completion of the realignment an d
streets in Tigard and in the Washington signalization of the Walnut Street/Tiedeman
County urban services agreement area. The Avenue intersection will be a construction
studies were conducted for many different priority during FY 2000-01.
reasons. Studies were performed to determine
the needs and priority of streets where speed ° Construction of the Gaarde Street Extension
humps have been requested, and to determine from Quail Hollow-West to Walnut Street
their effectiveness after speed humps were will be a major priority during FY 2000-01.
installed. Studies were done to evaluate the
need for new or existing traffic control ° Completion of the design for major projects
devices (signs and pavement markings). such as Gaarde Street Improvements from
Regularly scheduled traffic studies were done Highway 99W to 12151 Avenue, and
to maintain current data in areas under Burnham Street from Main Street to Hall
development. When speeding problems were Boulevard.
identified, information was provided to the
police department to assist in enforcement. Assuming approval by City Council of a
a Many citizens, developers, realtors, and transportation bond package, placement of
consulting engineers ask for this data on a the bond issue on the November ballot, and
regular basis. support of the Task Force's efforts to
3 promote the bond will be a major priority.
Most of these 72-hour studies began on
Tuesdays and ceded on Fridays, using I li-Star 'T'raffic calmming efforts will continue to be a
magnetic imaging equipment. Data gathered high priority for the next fiscal year. The
includes volumes, truck percentages, and development of a Conipl'cllCnslvc Traffic
Capital I " .ovcmcnl Program Overview
Page I I of I
Calming Program will be a major priority What's Next?
this calendar year.
The opportunity
Water quality projects will continue to have a for citizens of Tigard to
■ nominate projects for consideration in the FY
high priority in FY 2000-01. The Wetlands 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program will be
Enhancement Project at the Merestone area is provided in this meeting and in the April CIT
expected to be constructed in mid-summer meeting. For those that cannot attend the April
2000. A task force has been established to meeting, the City will accept written comments
develop a project for water quality or suggestions at any time in the process prior to
improvements to Summer Lake. approval by City Council. The final project
■ The City Council has indicated a strong listing will be a combination of City staff input
interest in providing street lighting in unlit and citizen recommendations. The proposed
areas of the City where street lights are program will be presented to the Planning
required to enhance pedestrian safety or to Commission in early June and to City Council
a
deter crime. The development of the during the June 23, 2000 Business Meeting. The
Comprehensive Public Facility Plan for approved plan will be ready for implementation
streetlights will be a priority during the July 1, 2000.
coming fiscal year. Streetlight installation is
integrated into the proposed bond projects, For more information, please`call or write to
and many of the new installations will be the following:
funded through the bond.
Vannie T. Nguyen, P.E.
■ Minor repairs to the storm drainage and Engineering Manager
sanitary sewer systems will again be E-mail: vahnie&i.tigard.or.us
performed through the Storm Drainage (503) 639-4171 Ext. 375
Major Maintenance and Sanitary Sewer
Repair Programs. Agustin P. Duenas, P.E.
■ The Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program City (503) Engineer
r Ext. 378
will be continued next fiscal year. There are E-mail: -4171 E. t 3 .onus
numerous residents in the Walnut Island area
that have indicated a strong interest in Mailing
participating in the program. We will be Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard
initiating some projects in the Walnut Island Tigard, Oregon 97223
area during the coming fiscal year.
a
2 ■ The Parks Program will continue with
acquisition of properties for future park
development. Design work and compliance
with permit requirements are currently
3 underway and are nearing completion.
a
a Water projects for maintenance and
expansion of the system will again be
continued in tltc next fiscal year.
Capital Improvement Program Oven•iew
Page 12 of 12
AGENDA ITEM No. 5 Date: June 27, 2000
TESTIMONY
SIGN-UP SHEET
Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on:
PUBLIC HEARING
CONSIDER RATIFYING
RESOLUTION NO. 0031, A
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET,
MAKING APPROPRIATIONS,
DECLARING THE VALOREM TAX LEVY
AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS
PROVIDED BY ORS 310.060(2) FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001
Due to Time Constraints
City Council May Impose
A Time Limit on Testimony
I:\ADM\GREER\CCSIGNUP\PH TESTMNY UPDATED 6-13.DOC
AGENDA ITEM No. 5
PLEASE PRINT
Pro onent - (Speaking In Favor) O onent - (Speaking Against) Neutral
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
AGENDA ITEM # 5
FOR AGENDA OF June 27, 2000
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: RATIFYING THE RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY
OF TIGARD, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS, DECLARING THE VALOREM TAX LEVY AND
CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS PROVIDED BY ORS 310.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01.
PREPARED BY: Craig Prosser DEPT HEAD OK C,& CITY MGR. OK Ql J I NI II
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Oregon Local Budget Law requires that a budget for the following fiscal year be adopted by the City Council prior
to July 1, after approval by the Budget Committee and after a public hearing has been held before the City Council.
A hearing was held on June 13, 2000, where a resolution adopting the budget was approved by the City Council.
However, the City Council did not approve the Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Because funds for projects
in the first year of the CIP are included in the Schedule of Appropriations, it will be necessary for the City Council
to ratify the resolution adopting the budget that was approved during the business meeting on June 13, 2000.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the FY 2000-01 Budget with one amendment explained below.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Tigard Budget Committee (comprised of the City Council plus five citizens) held three meetings on the City
Manager's Proposed FY 2000-01 Budget in May 2000. On May 15, the Budget Committee approved the Proposed
Budget with amendments and forwarded the Budget to the City Council for adoption.
Oregon Local Budget Law gives the governing body of the jurisdiction authority to make certain changes in the
Approved Budget prior to Adoption. The City Council may adjust resources or expenditures up or down as long as
the increase in a fund does not exceed 10% of the fund total.
During the Budget Committee hearings, Community Development Director Jim Hendryx told the committee that
staff was preparing a reorganization of the Community Development Department to improve services and reduce
costs. He indicated that it was too early to present this information to the Budget Committee, but that he hoped to
incorporate this reorganization into the Adopted FY 2000-01 Budget.
The reorganization of the Community Development Department has been completed, and the attached Resolution
and Schedule of Appropriations reflect the changes resulting form this reorganization. These changes reduce the
overall size of the Approved Budget by $101,909 and 2.5 positions. By adopting this resolution, Council will be
amending the Approved Budget by that amount.
Finally, the Proposed and Approved Budgets included a category called "Project Reserves". This category is new
to the Budget in FY 2000-01. This category includes $125,000 in the General Fund for future computer system
replacements and $925,000 in the Facility Fund for future new library construction. It was intended that these
reserves not be appropriated in FY 2000-01, but rather designated as a separate category within the Ending Fund
Balance, where they will be held for the future need. These reserves, therefore, do not appear in the Schedule of
Appropriations.
With these adjustments, the total FY 2000-01 City of Tigard Budget will be $46,466,332, down from $50,176,950
in FY 1999-00.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Adopt the FY 2000-01 Budget with amendments as shown in the attached resolution.
2. Adopt the FY 2000-01 Budget as approved by the Budget Committee. Because of the recent
reorganization of the Community Development Department, this would overstate the required
appropriations.
3. Adopt additional amendments to the Approved FY 2000-01 Budget, making sure that Funds do not
increase by more than 10%.
Note: By Oregon law, the FY 2000-01 Budget must be adopted by the City Council prior to July 1, 2000.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
The Proposed Budget reflects the Vision Task Force Goals.
FISCAL NOTES
The Budget Committee-Approved Budget includes total appropriations of $46,568,241. With the amendment to
incorporate the Community Development Department reorganization, total appropriations will be $46,466,332.
The resolution also levies general property taxes at the City's permanent rate of $2.5132 per thousand and levies
general obligation debt service property taxes in the amount of $286,606.
AGENDA ITEM # (o
FOR AGENDA OF June 27, 2000
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Resolution and Ballot Title for the Transportation Bond Measure
.y
PREPARED BY: A. . Duenas DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ~U Uy Y)
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Shall City Council approve the attached resolution with ballot title and explanatory statement authorizing the
placement of a Transportation Bond Measure on the November 7, 2000 election ballot in the amount of $16
million to finance transportation system improvement projects?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council approve, by motion, the resolution with ballot title and the explanatory
statement for placement of a Transportation Bond Measure on the November 7, 2000 election ballot.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Transportation Bond Task Force was created by City Council Resolution No. 99-19 (attached) to identify
transportation, safety, sidewalk, and pedestrian/bikepath projects for inclusion in a bond measure to be
submitted for voter approval. The Task Force began a yearlong process to develop a list of projects and obtain
public input prior to selection of a final list of projects for recommendation to the Planning Cormission and
City Council. After a series of public meetings (one on October 20, 1999 and the remainder in February 2000),
the Task Force met on March 8 and again on March 15 to select the projects for recommendation to the
Planning Commission and City Council.
The public input was carefully considered, and the final list focused on construction of major collectors, with
the inclusion of one minor collector (Former Street) that had safety issues. The estimated costs for the
recommended projects total $16 million, including the cost of issuance. Four alternative projects were included
in the final list. These projects are to be implemented if bids come in lower than anticipated, or if other funding
sources become available to supplement the bond proceeds.
The Task Force presented the list of projects to the Planning Commission on April 17, 2000, together with
specific recommendations on the proposed bond measure. The Planning Commission approved the project
package and Task Force recommendations and recommended them to the City Council for review and approval.
City Council approved the Task Force recommendations on May 9, 2000 and directed the preparation of a
resolution and ballot title to place the bond measure on the November 7, 2000 election ballot. This resolution
with ballot title and explanatory statement authorizcs the placement of the transportatio bona mPaci,re nn the
November 7, 2000 election ballot.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
The construction of projects through a Transportation Bond Measure meets all three goals in the Tigard Beyond
Tomorrow target area of Transportation and Traffic: Improve Traffic Flow, Improve Traffic Safety, and
Identify and Develop Funding Sources.
FISCAL NOTES
The Transportation Bond Measure, if approved, will provide funding for the design and construction of the
projects listed. Any projects that are currently under design, but not yet, completed, will be completed and will
use bond proceeds for the land acquisition and construction work.
1ACitywide\Som\Agenda for the Transportation Bond Measure Resolution
AGENDA ITEM #
FOR AGENDA OF June 27, 2000
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Resolution to approve an Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington County
PREPARED BY: G Benyos DEPT HEAD OK G. Duenas CITY MGR OK W. Monahan
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Shall Council approve the Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington County attached hereto as Exhibit A?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve the Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington County by passing the attached
Resolution.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Washington County is currently preparing to construct street improvements along SW Walnut Street at the
intersection with SW 12151 Avenue through the Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program (MSTIP3).
The proposed Intergovernmental Agreement would permit certain City improvements to be included in this County
project. The City improvements are described in the agreement and include water lines, sewer lines, storm drains,
and underground electrical conduits.
The proposed water lines are intended to provide increased capacity as recommended by Water Distribution
System Hydraulic Study for City of Tigard, prepared by Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc., May 2000. The
proposed sewer lines would provide sewer service to twenty-four residential lots. If Council approves the
agreement, Council will be requested to establish a sewer reimbursement district for these lots. The proposed
storm drains will provide drainage downstream of the project. Currently, power lines are installed on poles.
City street improvement standards require that power lines be placed underground. The franchise agreement
with Portland General Electric requires only that the power lines be reinstalled on poles that have been relocated
i to accommodate the street widening. Providing the underground electrical conduits will permit the power lines to
be installed underground.
0
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
The City could bid the project separately and coordinate the work with the County's contractor.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
a
None
FISCAL NOTES
Estimated costs for the project:
Waterlines $580,760
Sewer Lines $182,690
Storm Drains $146,720
PGE Conduits $135,000
Non-construction $104,520
Total $1,149,690
These amounts are included in the FY 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program from the respective funds.
iAdt MdelsumIwalnut&12tst 193A X
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
MAJOR STREET TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WALNUT STREET AT 121 ST AVENUE
Water, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drain Improvements
Underground Electrical Conduit Installation
CITY OF TIGARD
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between Washington County, a
political subdivision of the State of Oregon, acting by and through its Elected
Officials, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, and the City of Tigard, a municipal
corporation of the State of Oregon, acting by and through its City Council,
hereinafter referred to as CITY.
WITNESSETH
ARTICLE I - RECITALS
WHEREAS, on May 16, 1995, the voters approved a Major Streets
Transportation Improvement Program - Six Year Serial Levy for Roads (MSTIP
3); and
WHEREAS, improvements to Walnut Street at the intersection with 121sT
Avenue (PROJECT) is included within the list of projects approved by the voters;
and
WHEREAS, in May 1997, the voters approved Measure 50, which converted the
MSTIP3 levy to a part of the COUNTY permanent rate; and
WHEREAS, on June 23, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)
adopted a revised schedule for construction of the MSTIP 3 projects and
indicated its intent to proceed with the MSTIP3 projects on a revised schedule in
light of the fiscal impact of Measure 50; and
WHEREAS, by the authority granted by said MSTIP 3, the COUNTY may enter
into cooperative agreements with various cities within Washington County for the
performance of work on improvement projects with the allocations of costs and
terms and conditions mutually agreed to by the parties; and
F:\...\dschamp\TIGARD UTIL IGA2.doc 1
Ell
WHEREAS, ORS 190.010 authorizes agencies to enter into intergovern mental
agreements for the performance of any or all functions and activities that a party
to the agreement has the authority to perform; and
WHEREAS, CITY desires to install a 24-inch diameter water line for a distance of
approximately 550 feet and a 12-inch diameter water line for a distance of
approximately 525 feet along 121St Avenue, and a 24-inch diameter water line for
a distance of approximately 400 feet and a 12-inch diameter water line for a
distance of approximately 850 feet along Walnut Street, said CITY water lines
are hereinafter referred to as "Water lines" and are shown generally on the
attached Exhibit "A"; and,
WHEREAS, CITY desires to install an 8-inch diameter sanitary sewer line for a
distance of approximately 500 feet along 121" Avenue, and an 8-inch diameter
sanitary sewer line for a distance of approximately 1,400 feet along Walnut
Street, said CITY sewer lines are hereinafter referred to as "Sewer lines" and are
shown generally on the attached Exhibit "A"; and,
WHEREAS, CITY desires to install an 24-inch diameter storm drain line
downstream of the PROJECT for a distance of approximately 1,200 feet east
along Walnut Street from 116th Avenue, said CITY storm drain lines are
hereinafter referred to as "Storm Drains" and are shown generally on the
attached Exhibit "A"; and,
WHEREAS, CITY desires to install underground electrical conduits and vaults
(for use by Portland General Electric, PGE, under their franchise agreement with
CITY) for a distance of approximately 1,000 feet along 121St Avenue, and for a
distance of approximately 1,800 feet along Walnut Street, together with
underground conduits for conversions of service lines, said CITY power conduits
are hereinafter referred to as "PGE conduits" and are shown generally on the
attached Exhibit "A"; and,
WHEREAS, CITY has requested that the Water lines, Sewer lines, Storm Drains
and PGE conduits be added to the PROJECT, and CITY agrees to pay for such
requested work; and,
WHEREAS, under the cited authority, it is the mutual desire of COUNTY and
CITY to enter into such an Agreement to cooperate in the design and
construction of the Water lines, Sewer lines, Storm Drains and PGE conduits.
NOW, THEREFORE, the premises being in general as stated in the foregoing
recitals, and in consideration of the terms, conditions and covenants set forth
below, the parties hereto agree as follows:
F:\...\dschamp\TIGARD UTIL IGA2.doc 2
ARTICLE II - COUNTY OBLIGATIONS
1. COUNTY shall enter into and execute this Agreement during a duly
authorized session of its Board of County Commissioners.
2. COUNTY shall, upon execution of this Agreement, assign a liaison person
to be responsible for coordination of the PROJECT with CITY.
3. COUNTY shall perform or cause to be performed all actions necessary for
design and construction of the above referenced water lines, sewer lines,
storm drains and PGE conduits as part of the PROJECT, including design
engineering, contract administration, construction engineering and
inspection, and project management. COUNTY shall advertise for, award,
and administer the construction contract. COUNTY shall be responsible
for acceptance of contractor's work on behalf of CITY.
4. The COUNTY shall provide Water line, Sewer line, Storm Drains and PGE
conduit plans to the CITY, and incorporate the Water line, Sewer line,
Storm Drains and PGE conduits as specific bid item(s) in its bid
documents for the PROJECT. The PROJECT, including Water lines,
Sewer lines, Storm Drains shall be designed to meet City standards, and
PGE conduits shall be designed to meet PGE standards.
5. COUNTY shall provide CITY with the opportunity for design review of
50%, 75% and final plans prior to bidding.
6. COUNTY shall, following bid opening, notify CITY of the amount the
construction cost of the Water lines, Sewer lines, Storm Drains and PGE
conduits as contained in the construction contract bid and provide CITY
with the opportunity for review of the contract bid.
7. COUNTY shall provide inspection services for Water line, Sewer line,
Storm Drain trench excavation and backfill, and CITY shall provide
inspection services for Water line, Sewer line, Storm Drain and PGE
conduit installation and acceptance testing. COUNTY shall notify CITY of
Water line, Sewer line, Storm Drain and PGE conduit construction and be
responsible for coordinating inspection and acceptance testing in
accordance with Article III.
8. COUNTY shall perform actions regarding compensation as set forth in
Article IV - Compensation.
ARTICLE III - CITY OBLIGATIONS:
i. Ci T Y shall enter into and execute this Agreement during a duly authorized
session of the City Council.
FA...\dschamiATIGARD UTIL IGA2.doc 3
b
2. CITY shall, upon execution of this Agreement, assign a liaison person to
be responsible for coordination of PROJECT with COUNTY.
3. CITY shall provide COUNTY with standard specifications for the
construction of Water lines, Sewer lines, Storm Drains and PGE conduits.
4. CITY shall review plans and specifications for the Water lines, Sewer
lines, Storm Drains and PGE conduits provided by the COUNTY.
5. CITY shall provide inspection and monitoring of the Water line, Sewer
line, Storm Drain and PGE conduit installation in coordination with the
COUNTY. CITY shall be responsible for all acceptance testing conducted
by the contractor as specified. These services shall be provided at CITY
expense.
6. CITY shall review plans and provide comments back to COUNTY within
10 workdays and review bids within 2 workdays.
7. CITY shall perform actions regarding compensation as set forth in Article
IV - Compensation.
ARTICLE IV - COMPENSATION
1. CITY shall pay to the COUNTY the actual Water line, Sewer line, Storm
Drain and PGE conduit construction cost, the additional construction cost
to the PROJECT caused by inclusion of the Water lines, Sewer lines,
Storm Drains and PGE conduits in the PROJECT, and the non-
construction cost for the Water lines, Sewer lines, Storm Drains and PGE
conduits.
The Water line, Sewer line, Storm Drain and PGE conduit construction
costs shall include the actual construction cost of applicable unit price
contract items and an allocated share of the cost of applicable lump sum
contract items (for example, traffic control, erosion control), and the cost
for any extra work required for the Water line, Sewer line, Storm Drain and
PGE conduit construction.
The non-construction cost shall include the cost for design engineering,
contract management, construction engineering and inspection, and
project management, which shall be calculated as a flat rate of ten (10)
percent of the Water line, Sewer line, Storm Drain and PGE conduit
construction cost (amount paid to the COUNTY's construction contractor
f(.)( VVQLCI Illlc, vv••.,.
' c-ipr lien, Storm Drain and PGE conduit work including
extra work).
P:\...\dschamp\TIGARD UfIL IGA2.doc 4
The estimated construction cost of the Water lines is $580,760, the
estimated construction cost of the Sewer lines is $182,690, the estimated
construction cost of the Storm Drains is $146,720, the estimated
construction cost of the PGE conduits is $135,000, the additional
construction cost to the PROJECT caused by inclusion of the Water lines,
Sewer lines, Storm Drains and PGE conduits in the PROJECT is
estimated to be $1,045,170, and the estimated non-construction cost for
the Water lines, Sewer lines, Storm Drains and PGE conduits is $104,520
($1,045,170 x 10 percent), for a total estimated cost for the Water lines,
Sewer lines, Storm Drains and PGE conduits of $1,149,690. It is
understood that the estimated costs are used to determine PROJECT
budget and deposit amounts used within this Agreement.
Final costs will be based on the actual bid amount of the schedule of
prices and quantities used and installed. Final payments made by the
CITY to the COUNTY related to this PROJECT shall be based on actual
bids and construction costs.
2. CITY shall, no later than 7 days prior to bidding letting, deposit with the
COUNTY an amount equal to 10 percent of the estimated cost of the
Water lines, Sewer lines, Storm Drains and PGE conduits or $114,970
($1,149,690 x 10 percent).
3. COUNTY shall, at least once each calendar quarter, prepare and submit
invoices to the CITY in sufficient detail and in a form acceptable to the
CITY for the cost of Water lines, Sewer lines, Storm Drains and PGE
conduits work in excess of the CITY deposit. COUNTY shall, within 90
days after completion of the PROJECT, prepare and submit a final
statement of expenditures to the CRY. Final payment will be based on
actual quantities determined as provided by the specifications.
4. CITY shall pay COUNTY for Water line, Sewer line, Storm Drain and PGE
conduit costs as billed within thirty (30) days after receipt of COUNTY
billing.
ARTICLE V - GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Laws of Oregon
The parties agree to abide by all applicable laws and regulations regarding the
handling and expenditure of public funds. This Agreement shall be governed by
the laws of the State of Oregon. All provisions required by ORS Chapter 279 to
be included in public contracts are hereby incorporated by reference and made a
part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein.
F;\...\Awhamn\TIt:ARD UTIL. IGA2.doc 5
2. Default
Either party shall be deemed to be in default if it fails to comply with any
provision of this Agreement. City and County agree time is of the essence in the
performance of any of the obligations within this Agreement. Complaining party
shall provide the other party with written notice of default and allow thirty (30)
days within which to cure the defect. City shall pay the County for costs incurred
for satisfactorily completed and authorized work up to the time of default. Each
party shall be liable for all costs and damages arising from default by the other
party.
3. Indemnification
This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only. Each party agrees to
indemnify and hold the other harmless, to include their respective officers,
employees, agents and representatives, from and against all claims, demands
and causes of actions and suits of any kind or nature for personal injury, death or
damage to property on account of or rising out of services performed, the
omission of services or in any way resulting from the acts or omissions of the
parties so indemnifying and/or its officers, employees, agents or representatives.
Indemnification is subject to and shall not exceed the limits of liability of the
Oregon Tort Claims Act (ORS 30.260 through 30.300). In addition, each party
shall be responsible for any contract claims, delay damages or similar items
caused by the action or inaction of the party.
4. Documents are Public Property
All records, reports, data, documents, systems, and concepts, whether in the
form of writings, figures, graphs, or models which are prepared or developed in
connection with this PROJECT shall become public property.
5. Modification of Agreement
No waiver, consent, modification or change of terms of this Agreement shall bind
either party unless in writing, signed by both parties. Such waiver, consent,
modification or change, if made, shall be effective only in specific instances and
for the specific purpose given.
6. Dispute Resolution
The parties agree to use their best efforts to resolve any dispute arising out of
this Agreement by mediation. If mediation is not successful, the dispute shall be
settled by binding arbitration conducted by the Arbitration Service of Portland,
Inc., and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in
any court having jurisdiction i.nereoi. The arbiiration snaii be before a singie
arbitrator. The cost of arbitration shall be shared equally; provided, however,
FA...\dschmmp\TIGARD UTIL IGA2.doc 6
111011111111
that the arbitrator may award costs and fees to the prevailing party. The
arbitration shall be held within 60 days of selection of the arbitrator uniess
otherwise agreed to by the parties.
7. Severability
The parties agree that if any term of provision of this agreement is declared by a
court to be illegal or in conflict with any law, the validity of the remaining terms
and provisions shall not be affected, so long as this agreement continues to
reflect the intent of the parties. In the event the intent of the parties is not carried
out by the severed agreement, the parties shall negotiate an equitable
adjustment of this agreement so that purposes of this agreement are given
effect.
8. Nondiscrimination
No person shall be denied or subjected to discrimination in receipt of the benefits
of any services or activities made possible by or resulting from this Agreement
on the grounds of race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national
origin, disability, age or marital status. Any violation of this provision shall be
considered a material defect and shall be grounds for cancellation, termination or
suspension in whole or in part by the County.
9. Integration
This Agreement includes the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes
any prior discussions or agreements regarding the same subject. There are not
understandings, agreements, or representations, oral or written, not specified
herein regarding this contract.
ARTICLE VI - TERN! OF AGREEMENT
1. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of execution for three
years or until completion of all obligations, whichever is later.
2. This Agreement may be amended or extended for periods of up to one
year by consent of the parties, subject to provisions of this Agreement.
Except for breach, it may be canceled or terminated for any reason
beyond the control of the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed
their seals as of the day and year hereinafter written.
F -AdschamrATIGARD UTIL IGA2.doc 7
DONE AND DATED this day of , 2000•
WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON CITY OF TIGARD
Chair, Board of Commissioners City Manager
Recording Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Loretta S. Skurdahl
Senior Assistant County Counsel
FA...\dschamp\TIGARD UTIL IGA2.doc 8
loo 50 0 100 200
UNITS IN METERS
SCALE= 1 t 4000
t
t
S W ANN _ r f
S..........
.W ANN
•
~'l,
ELECTRIC
•
CONDUITS-
t
r : f
1 ELECTRIC
d
OFFSI .
CONDUITS
STORM
Q"
t
WATER;
t i dd
DRAly.
t
N...__.._:.._..._..._. 5, N
' Y
. WATER
i
LINE
` AIUTARY!
j
• ER ,
1
-
{
SANITARY 4 - F _I-
,
s'
SEER vi
f
r '
:i
r-
f.w ~
~I
\S
TI~P11T -
j S.W.
i
i
r
i i ~i
i S.W. CARMEN ST.
4_...._ -
svm
PROJECT S. W. WALNUT STREET - ~
m nnL PROPOSED UTILITY LOCATIONS ED, EXHIDIT DRAPING
Wo"T N0.
. PROJECT 4000 0.0
owl
Wmkm WAPPROVED BY
DESIGN BY vpw R-~~-nn
MAIM BY vow
® nC►/
AGENDA ITEM No. 8 Date: June 27, 2000
E TI
GN - SHEET
Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on:
PUBLIC HEARING
.(LEGISLATIVE)
ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO
ALLOW DAYCARE USES IN
INDUSTRIAL ZONES (ZOA) 1999-0003
Due to Time Constraints
City Council May Impose
A Time Limit on Testimony
3 '
I:\ADM\GREER\CCSIGNUP\PH TESTMNY UPDATED 6-13.DOC
AGENDA ITEM No. 8
PLEASE PRINT
Pro onent - S eakin In Favor Opponent - S eakin Against) Neutral
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
--7
r s ~ 73
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
I - L__ -
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
i Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
a I
AGENDA ITEM # 0
FOR AGENDA OF June 27, 2000
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA1999-00003) to Allow Day Care Uses in
Industrial Zone I
PREPARED BY:Julia Hjiduk DEPT HEAD OIL N Y~ CITY MGR OK L W 1 ~YV f
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Adopt code language by Ordinance for the Zone Ordinance Amendment to allow day care uses in
Industrial zones.
STAFF RECOMIYMEI`TDATION
Adopt the attached Ordinance amending the Tigard Development Code to allow day care uses in
Industrial zones.
INFORMATI N SUMMARY
At the April 25, 2000 public hearing, the City Council indicated they were in favor of approving the
request in concept. Staff was directed to prepare language and come to the City Council with
recommended language at a work session on June 20, 2000. Staff has prepared recommended language
and a draft Ordinance to be discussed at the work session. Because of the timing for distribution of the
Council Packet, staff has included the recommended language and Ordinance with this packet. Of course
if Council provides direction to staff to make changes at the work session, staff will make the requested
changes and include a revised Ordinance and code amendment language with the Council newsletter or
distribute it at the meeting on June 27, 2000.
The City Council directed staff at the April 25, 2000 public hearing to draft language for a code change
that would allow day care uses in Industrial zones with restrictions that would both insure the safety and
efficiency of the day care use, as well as, insure that adjacent uses could continue without the need to
make site upgrades in response to the day care use adjacent to it. Staff contacted the Childcare Division
Day Care Unit, DEQ, the Oregon Health Division, and several cities that allow day care uses in Industrial
zones for input on proposed language. Attached, for reference, is the detailed summary of staff's
findings, the proposed language with restrictions, and a draft Ordinance (these items were also included in
the packet for the June 20, 2000 meeting).
Exhibits: A - Proposed Ordinance with Industrial Zone Section Code Language Attached
B - Summary of Staff's Recommendation and Background Information
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Direct staff to make additional changes to the proposed language prior to the City Council meeting.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
N/A
FISCAL NOTES
N/A
I:cumin/iulia/zoa/zoa l 999-03ais5.doc
19-Jun-00/9:43 AM
"EXHIBIT B"
Cidq of Tigard
Community (Development
ShapingA Better Community
E 0 Ems
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, Oregon 97223
(503) 639-4171
Fax 684-7297
TO: City Council
FROM: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner
DATE: June 2, 2000
SUBJECT: Zone Ordinance Amendment to Allow Day care uses in Industrial Zones
Recommendation and Background Information.
The City Council indicated that they had concerns that a new day care next to existing industrial
uses would require the existing industrial uses to change their operating procedures to comply
with regulatory requirements. Staff has contacted the Children's Services Division (CSD) Day
Care unit, DEQ, and the Oregon Health Division to research whether there would be any
potential problems. Staff has also reviewed the Tigard Municipal Code and several other cities
development codes for guidance in preparing recommended language. The following
summarizes what staff found:
CSD
There are no locational criteria for a day care that would prohibit location near an industrial use.
The standards do, however, require a certain amount of outdoor space based on the number of
children using the facility at one time.
DEQ
DEQ standards do not require different compliance standards based on the use of adjacent
properties, therefore, a day care would not require any more regulatory compliance than that of
another industrial use. When asked if the federal EPA may have rules or regulations that would
impact existing uses next to new day cares, staff was informed that DEQ regulates the EPA
rules. Since DEQ rules are not dependent on the use or adjacent uses, neither would the EPA
rules. Of course, if an existing industrial use was not in compliance or wished to increase the
amount of discharge into the air or water, DEQ would have to review permits which may or may
not be approved based on the regulatory standards. This approval will not, however, be based
on adjacent users.
Health Division/OSSHA
There are no stricter regulations for contaminants next to a day care than for any other use. Any
facility is required to meet health and safety standards for their employees but they are not
mandated to insure their operation meets this for employees in adjacent businesses.
111111111111all MM ~rj
F it f Ti r i
The Tigard Municipa Code lists day cares as a "noise-sensitive land use". The maximum noise
level d the property line of a noise sensitive land use is 55OdB duri^ the day and 40dB during
the nigght. There is a potential that existing industrial uses may exceed this at the property line of
tenfial day care sites. Staff has recommended that a restriction of the permitted day care use
Eothe measuring of noise levels (as well as other environmental elements) and requiring that
the proposed day care site be designed so as to meet this standard. This will put the burden on
the day care, instead of on existing uses.
Neighboring it Standards for Comparison
Staff reviewed he following cities development codes to determine if they had restrictions or
regulations that the City of Tigard could incorporate into this amendment:
Portland
Beaverton
P Oregon City
o Tualatin
o Salem
Gresham
Among these Cities, the regulations and restrictions vary from not permitted, permitted outright
and permitted conditionally. Staff looked at the conditional use regulations and restrictions for
cities that did allow them to determine if any of these restrictions should be applied in the City of
Tigard. Several Cities had requirements on the amount of outdoor open space for the day care
use. Staff does not feel this is necessary, since the amount of outdoor open space is regulated
by the Children's Services Division permit requirements. Staff does, however, believe that a
condition that the applicant work with CSD pro to submitting the application to the City is
necessary. A condition of final inspection and occupancy should be to obtain a permit from CSD
to operate the day care center is also appropriate. The City of Tualatin allows day care uses
outright in industrial zones provided they are more than 400 feet away from exterior walls and
pump islands of any automobile service station. Staff has found no specific reason for this
standard from DEQ or CSD. While the City of Portland's Conditional Use cr'iter'ia appear to most
closely address the concerns the City Council raised at the last hearing, staff finds that the
majority are too vague to adequately analyze as discretionary criteria. By complying with the
Site Development Review standards and special restrictions staff has recommended, the site
will be suitable for the proposed day care use.
Staff has not recommended site size limitations (nor have they been found in other cities
researched), however, the City Council may chose to set minimum or maximum lot sizes. If this
is requested, it may eliminate smaller infill sites or require a developer to partition a larger site
that may be more appropriate to be developed as part of a development complex.
Recommendation:
Staff has determined that there are some specific restrictions that are clear and objective that
can and should be placed on day care uses in industrial zones. Included in the Council packet
is the recommended language to be places in the Industrial zone section of the development
code. Staff does not recommend requiring applicants to go through the Conditional Use process
because the recommended restrictions are clear and objective and can be adequately
addressed by staff. If, however, the Council wishes to have an added level of review, staff has
prepared draft changes to the Conditional Use section of the Tigard Community Development
Code for Council to consider at the work session. It should be noted that the recommended
restrictions remain the same. The only change would be the process in which they are
reviewed.
I:curp1nrJu1ia/Z0A1Z0A1999-03report.doc
Page 2 of 2
NINE 0
AGENDA ITEM # q
FOR AGENDA OF June 27, 2000
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE A Resolution Establishing Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical Permit
and Related Fees. ,
1'Y/..i
PREPARED BY: Garv Lampeiia DEPT HF,A.n OK ~i►1;~,_ MGR OK F (,\;'Y VV MVI
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Approval by City Council for the proposed resolution to provide increased fees for the building inspection
program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached resolution increasing and establishing fees for the building code administration program.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
It reasonable and necessary for the City to increase these fees in order to cover the cost of services provided.
Existing permit fees are not adequate to cover program costs. Building Division revenues for this fiscal year are
projected to be less than the total expenses. This will put the Building Division in a deficit. The proposed fee
schedules will enable the Building Division to build a reserve fund equal to a six (6) month operating budget
within the next four (4) to five (5) years. The fee increases proposed will enable the City to continue to provide
building code services in the future.
This is the second part of a fee increase that was proposed the past fiscal year. At that time, the proposal was
for an average increase of 102%. At the urging of the City Council and other interested parties, this was
reduced to an average of about 51%. Further, staff was asked to have an outside agency or firm perform an
audit of the Building Division to determine efficiencies and effectiveness of staffing and procedures prior to
requesting action on another increase proposal. The Building Division has completed this audit. Management
has looked at the recommendations and have made changes to the organization that we felt were necessary.
These changes go into effect on July 1, 2000. As a result of these changes, the Building Division has reduced
its overall budget considerably. Coupled with this reduction in budget, staff was able to reduce the increase for
electrical, 1 & 2 family structural and commercial structural permits from 30% to 25%. Mechanical and
a plumbing permits remained at the original 45% increase.
i
i
We advertised an open house for interested parties to be held on June 19, 2000. The purpose of this is to
i provide the fee increase documents to any interested party for their review and comments at the scheduled
public hearing on June 27, 2000.
Staff requests that City Council approve the increase with an effective date of September 1, 2000. 'Me have
notified the State of Oregon Building Codes Division and all other interested parties of this implementation
date.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to subsidize the Building inspection program through the general fund.
Reduce customer service standards to permit applicants.
FISCAL, NOTES
The proposed fee increases are:
• Building permits: An average 25% increase
• Mechanical permits: An average 45% increase
• Plumbing permits: An average 45% increase
• Electrical permits: An average 25% increase
• Miscellaneous: Several minor miscellaneous fees are also proposed.
iAcirywidOsum.dot
i
i
i
LM
ve+'
~IOi~;r9~ 'Doiv1~1~
Fee 1~crea~e
Background
Council approved 51% increase last
fiscal Year
Recommended Building Division ud~h.~
prior to next fee increase proposal
Audit completed M2000
Community Development took
recommendation of audit and initiated
where appropriate
..~nmp~A~Al1flIIIIIIIAIIF
IN 111 ;11: 111111 Ili 11:1, Ili
"Bill I
U17 (cont-fd)
F Cirgro
Audit resulted in a reorganization for
Community Development
Building Division his reduced overall
budget
This reduction allowed a reduction of
the fee increase
Fi.cal year f 999100
progranlis
Fund Conditions Division is
ll Budget -the et Building defic't
overa ~►av~ a budgen
projected roxi~►ately $150►
6130' pp of APP 220 and Suilding eV ed to
F.lectraca9 Fund
Count11 has a
245. mash 9ton USerV!ces
reed tO
cover the del cit en the
to
and City Counsel has a9
fund trOtn the Generalnfund 2.45
transfer f
fecit in funds 220
Cover the deunds
LBCjLI3LtJJ!y t5
;I WB
n9,9910
FiscO 1 yre or f
t d) ~
pl?o0graftis t Will use
ctrica4 Program - this I)rogram
for Fis~l
EIabout ,~OU~ X40,000 of its res fund balance for
Year 1999100. Starting about
FYear 20OU101 wOU~d be
$j)qFOOOw the Projected deficit
Program 000 for
Plumbing ll be about $39~
this Program Fiscal Year 1999108'
Ffscal Co )'earnt dl 999/00
prvga°ae~s
Mechanical Program -the projected deficit
in this program wifo be about $69.000 for
Fiscal Year 1999100. the
1 & 2 FaM~oY Structural Program vy~01 be
prolected deficit in this program
1 Year 1999100.
a$31,000 for Fisca
A-M
yrea 999/0
Cal
Fis)
Pr'J'gra,015 lcontfd)
cia l Structural rog~~ the
aa,~ wi81 be
C()Mmelr e in this p
PI ,0~ected reserve
for Fiscal Year 19991 ~ o
about $3,900 revenue~ ~il~ not continue
Current InsPection Programli
suppthe Building
LEGIBILITY STRIP
A~f
Eee Increase Proposal
Increase plumbing 45% above current fee
schedule.
Increase mechanical 45% above current
fee schedule.
Increase electrical 250/co above current fee
sc%hesiule.
goo-moo
Increase Prop
(C, 0
elting bUjjd7InCJ
crease 2 fa~fee vv schedules
In
~ above current .t5 /o buiidi
►~9 pernilts
~omerc t fe~ sc~iedule?~5Ca/o~~b~ve curre°~ pivision to
~ui1d►n~ pa
.r~~S ~Ould a11o the nd bUild
Cover x°~~nth
~~er a~u at a A,,5 Year pellods
rese,tve
LN;1i1151L1'L'Y b"1'xlr
ReservOFUHd-s
Piscal Year 2000/01 Reserves:
Electrical program -the projected
ending fund balance for Fiscal Year
2000/01 would be approximately
$106,000°
Plumbing program ° the pr'ected
ojending fund balance for Year
2000/01 would be approximately
X10, .
Reserve Funds (COHt-fd)
Mechanical Program -the projected
ending fund balance for Fiscal Year
2000101 would be a deficit of
approximately $41.,000.
1 2 Family Structural Program -the
projected ending fund balance for Fiscal
Year 2000/01 would be approximately
$80,0000
Reserve Funds (colytOd')
Commercial Structural Program -the
projected eroding fund balance for Fiscal
Year 2000/01 would be approximately
$125,000.
t1d)
FgInds Con
eAlOg'Fiscal
1PrO(jramFunCl5
041a mtft,,, end of r1rIscal
'Year 2OU31 game -Ljm~ VvOuld have a
Prociraos ' ~~ri program p~'~~r~ ~°u,d
&t~etracX31 TWIS cover its
-,&Ifeat OIDID, gve Of $1-231 d able tO
rese ~~tmn9
I)e Selto ~rate• the end Of Fi~~~~
lasts ~ram ~ou0d h ~
►n9 Program
Plutn~$~es Prog
,fear 20031 iD41 reserve of $34,000%
iTeserve FIIflO5 gram 0"11111
was tamount of about
al rocJr tit,, viech ~{°►cit in t~ ~~Oly cover
OUIC, need
0 Ocrease V 1.040/to
still be in order $1.74,000 ro
grma ,the I
oo of about its
~~~es~
,t the egg
the '10
be o prograVI
u er study °
VIII ;it on~tor at the
for
a►~u
C,~~t~ ~ nd revenu~S r°gra, prog,
structural h
7.
&7 " Fa M1'y ~op3 1Oho 6►
SC~~ I ea~
~d Of V° ~serve of oA
e
Reserve,Fawnys (contiy)
Commercial StructuraO grogram - at the
ero o Fiscal Year 20003/04, this program
would have a reserve of $467,,000.
~Vlly~1lY JSLAY
arve ear 2003104 t
Rw,.;evv tl
6in enta,n its OVV TI
the e~ r~ qram vv►ile~~ue to cover ttie
r,eserv ~ erates Suit din9 Vqjnd
t~~$~~ to ~f ~ oo3l a 2515 X011 61ncj
is*
tell
"Ma
A,t the eon Sevvices
x,45 and orb n eserv e Of a$ mont~s
coeY►°n IDIVis~on.
~ave a Wch his close tO$60pr0~ r budget for t
MEMEL,
Ele,.ctrical Permits FYOO/01
Projec tedcos tof Pro gram -$200,557
210,000 P. 207,200
200,000
190,000
® ElecthealPenuits FY00-01
176790 T-, 25%hcrease
180,000
4
170,000
1601000
Without he re a s e Wit h he re a s e
F
oil MINEEMEMEMENIMM
'FlIumbinu P"evwmiflts IF v Umw/ol
Projected Cost of Program $145,936
:180, 000 1562315
:160, 000
:140, 000 117,200
-120,000
:100, 000 0 Plumbing Permits FY 00-01
K1~
80,000 45% Increase
r
60,000
40,000
>f
20,000
Without Increase With Increase
MiacmAnamnical Permits
FYOO/01
Projected Cost of Program $113,021
80,000 71,500
70,000
53,640
60,000
50,000 r r
0 Mechanical Permits FY 00
40,000
01 45% Increase
30,000 A
5. ~ 4' 321 tY-
20,000 = F ` Y'
Z
10,000
W ithout Increase W ith Increase
r
One Perm"Its FYOO/01
Pro jectedCos tof Pio gram -$412,571
i
6 X00,000 493,300
500,000
-
400,000
0Single -F a miy P ermits
a5
300,000
FY00-0125% hcrease
200,000
100,000
LI
Without hcrease With hcrease
cia)
m m e
Aft g%,m
FY F UO/ul
Pro jectedCos tof Pio gram -$425,738
6 00,0 0 0
t
5 00,00 0 456,200
400,000
F3 00,000 ~C o mmerc ial P ermits
FY00-01 25% Increase
200,000
-
100,000
Without Increase With hcrease
mom
Pcouff- 'fear Pff-
IUJ
1,5 50,000 ' 4-1' 1,493,712
1,500,000 1 479 515
1,450,000
1 01,708
11400,000 1,3 ,
1 350 000 31,566 El Revenues
' .1:; 97,823 " t Expenses
1,300,000
1,250,000
- x_
19200,000
?'.f
1,150,000
F Y 00/01 F Y O 1 /02 F Y 02/03 F Y 03/04
AMIM
Ar"W
'OrganIzati0i
The Building Division reduced staff from
5 FTE to 12.5 FTE from Fy 99/00 to Fll
00/019
2 FTE were eliminated by retirements
Iu5 FTE positions were eliminated due to
the reorganizations
1 FTE was added to the i~►iseon for the
eranit counters
ReOr94?&q1z9?dOfl (Cont'd
The Development Services Technicians
were split into 2 groups,
Planning/ Engineering Permit Technicians
and building Permit Technicianso
2 other positions have been re-asigned
'an duties to provide hamf-~irne counter
backup.
3ob duties have been re-assigned to the
building inspection section.
i c
The total budgeted expenditures for FY
99/00 was approximately $1.5 million.
The total budgeted expenditures for FY
00/01 will be approximately $1.29 million
This is a redaction of about $overall.
AGENDA ITEM No. 10 Date: June 27, 2000
% if
¢T TI
S"'IGNO-UP SHEET
Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on:
PUBLIC HEARING
SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1999-2000
Due to Time Constraints
City Council May Impose
A Time Limit can Testimony
I:\HDM\GREER\CCSIGNUP\PH TESTMNY UPDATED 6-13.00C
1
AGENDA ITEM No. 10
PLEASE PRINT
Proponent - (Speaking In Favor Opponent - (speaking Against) Neutral
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
I
AGENDA ITEM # /0
FOR AGENDA OF June 27, 2000
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Resolution Adopting a Supplemental Budget for Fiscal Year 1999/00 ii
PREPARED BY: Craig Prosser DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK l
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Shall the City Council adopt a supplemental budget resolution for Fiscal Year 1999/00 increasing
appropriations in the 69th Avenue Local Improvement District (LID) Fund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City Council approve the attached resolution adopting a supplemental budget for Fiscal Year 1999/00.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City Council established the 69th Avenue Local Improvement District (LID) through Ordinance No. 99-07.
The Ordinance authorized the acquisition of land as provided by State law and the Tigard Municipal Code, and
authorized the construction of street improvements within the boundaries of the LID. Although much of the
project has now been completed, additional appropriations are required for the current fiscal year to provide the
spending authority to complete the project. Interim financing for the project is being provided through the
issuance of notes. Once the project is completed, the individual property owners will be assessed and bonds
will be sold providing long-term financing.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not adopt a supplemental budget for the current year but the City could face an Oregon Budget Law
violation.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
N/A
FTCC A T . NOTF.C
Increase appropriations for Capital Improvements by $403,530 in the 69th Avenue LID Fund.
AGENDA ITEM No. 11 Date: June 27, 2000
TEST11MIONY
SIGN-UP SHEET
Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on:
PUBLIC HEARING
(INFORMATIONAL)
SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT
DISTRICT NO. 18
SW WALNUT STREET AT THE
INTERSECTION WITH SW 121ST
AVENUE
Due to Time Constraints
City Council May Impose
A Time limit on Testimony
1:\ADM\GREER\CCSIGNUP\PH TESTMNY UPDATED 6-13.DOC
AGENDA ITEM No. 11
PLEASE PRINT
Proponent - (Speaking in Favor Opponent - S eakin Against Neutral
Name, Address & Phone No. Na a Address & Pno a No. Name, Address & Phone No,
II8 S a,LwJ'T
Ti 0
Sri o 3
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.
i
AGENDA ITEM #
FOR AGENDA OF June 27.2000
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Formation of anit Sewer Reimbursement District No. 13
PREPARED BY: G. Be ~y -DEPT HEAD OK A. Du as CITY MGR OK W. Monahan
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Formation of a sewer reimbursement district to construct a sanitary sewer project as part of the Neighborhood
Sewer Extension Program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the attached Resolution forming the Reimbursement District.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The proposed project would provide sewer service to twenty-four lots along SW Walnut Street and SW 12151
Avenue. Through the City's Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program, the City would install public sewers to
each lot within the Reimbursement District and the owners would reimburse the City for a fair share of the cost of
the public sewer at the time of connection to the sewer. In addition, each owner would be required to pay a
connection fee of $2,335 before connecting to the line and would be responsible for disconnecting the existing
septic system according to County rules and any other plumbing modifications necessary to connect to the
public line. Each owner has been notified of the hearing by mail. The notice, mailing list and additional details
are included in the City Engineer's Report for the proposed Ordinance.
If Council approves this request to form the Reimbursement District, Washington County will construct the
sewers through a Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program (MSTIP3) project. The City will
reimburse the County for the cost of the sewers through an Intergovernmental Agreement approved by Council
during the current meeting.
A revised City Engineer's Report will be submitted to Council after construction is completed and actual
construction costs are determined.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Direct that the resolution be revised.
2. Reject the Reimbursement District.
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND COMMITTEE STRATEGY
Not applicable.
FISCAL NOTES
Funding is by unrestricted sanitary sewer funds. FISCAL
i
1Aeng\gregVeim\walnut and 121st-relml8k3is for fonnation.dx
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO.98- S
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A NEIGHBORHOOD SEWER REIMBURSEMENT
DISTRICT INCENTIVE PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the City has initiated the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program to extend public sewers
through Reimbursement Districts in accordance with TMC Chapter 13.09; and
WHEREAS, the amounts reimbursed by residential lot owners in the past have been below $8,000 per
connection; and
WHEREAS, the reimbursement districts that are currently under consideration have estimated
reimbursement costs ranging from $9,000 to $14,000 per connection; and
WHEREAS, the costs of reversing residential plumbing, closing the existing septic tank, installation of a
sewer lateral to connect to the public system, and payment of the connection fee add several thousand
dollars more to the burden of a residential lot owner who wishes to connect to City sewer; and
WHEREAS; the City Council wishes to initiate an incentive program to encourage residents to connect to
public sewer; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that establishing a maximum reimbursement fee for residents to pay
will further the objectives of the program by encouraging formation of sewer reimbursement districts and
actual connections to public sewer; and
WHEREAS, based on previous reimbursement districts, the amount of $8,000 appears to be a reasonable
amount to establish as the maximum fee for reimbursement by residential lot owners; and
WHEREAS, the City Council concurs that the sum of $15,000 should be established as the maximum cost
per connection; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to offer this incentive program for a two-year period, after which the
program will be evaluated for continuation.
i
i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
i SECTION 1: An incentive program is hereby established for the Neighborhood Sewer Extension
Program with a maximum fee of $8,000 for reimbursement by residential lot owners.
This applies only to the reimbursement fee for the sewer installation and not to the
connection fee, which is still payable upon application for sewer connection.
3
a
e~r• rrniv 2• 'T'hk Racnl„ tine shall aunty to sewer connections provided through sewer
reimbursement districts established by October 12, 2000. All connections qualifying
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 5)
Page 1
ncil approval
under this incentive program must be completed within 7,on
of the final City Engineer's Report following a final puted in
accordance with TMC Section 13.09.105.
SECTION 3: The
City Engineer's Report required by TMC Chapter provision
that to the extent that the reimbursement fee determined Section
13.09.040 does not exceed $15,000, the amount to be reimbursed by an owner of a lot
zoned single-family residential shall not exceed $8,000 per connection, provided the lot
owner complies with the provisions of Section 2. Any amount over $15,000 shall be
reimbursed by the owner. Residential lot owners who do not connect to sewer in
accordance with Section 2 shall pay the full reimbursement amount as determined by
the final City Engineer's Report.
SECTION 4: The funding source for the Neighborhood Sewer Reimbursement District Program shall
provide the funding for the installation costs over $8,000 up to a maximum of $15,000
per connection.
PASSED: This 3 day of OCA-OV-12-AL 1998.
.-C
of igard
y r -City
ATTEST:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
Oc"idoVesVeimi.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 5
Page 2
SECTION 3 T2S Ri W W.M.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
' ~ _ 1ST^'s~`C!~pj~ ~r~ Q
FLI
j7 j I ~JJ~ p g M E]bfm01 Y•~ - • . .}Y~\ ~i' ti%. - ~tY:.+.
STRER R I ~ ~ p F mv+Kmxm ~ rc +-`-`•~siw~ ~ r ~ . r1- ?-r'.a~ _ '
r,y, b{ ? ~.-r,- v 0• ~ Ryam.
- ~ T ^Y`K~~µ1~ a,610plim `~l~~ 1lYO A 111r ~ f ~ J+tl ~ a/- ,c• Y~-\ Fem. `.~i
..'"t.`•'ta'r\ ~ ~',ft..~~pwsjC~'~'- as ..+A-~4"'~~~'> M'.?M.. l--.
•a w•<< i/i/.: a-r>~'ry `~s'L,`Y ° S 1S K-1b,~,yy,ti~~c'^+'r.~~', x~.. ~i:r:~.:
i ~ Q. r y''j, ~yY,w uaa er w~n~ s1 L
• / r-_~'•~.-y~•a....wi yet; ~:i ~1.:
Vicinity Map
Not to swe
3 TIPPITT PL i`yr r '
r I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION I I I ~__J___~-~~ t ~M~`~
fff CARMEN ST
TAX LOT 2S103BA00500 TAX LOT 2SIO38DO0200 YYY---
TAX LOT 2S103BA00600 TAX LOT 2S1038000300
TAX LOT 2S103BA00700 TAX LOT 2S103BDO0400
TAX LOT 2S103BA00800 TAX LOT 2SIO38DO0602 -Exhibit "B"
TAX LOT 2S103BA01001 TAX LOT 2SIO38000600
TAX LOT 2S103BA01003 TAX LOT 251038000700
TAX LOT 2S1038B00700 TAX LOT 2SIO39DO0800
TAX LOT 2SIO38000100 TAX LOT 251038000901
TAX LOT 2SIO38000200 TAX LOT 2S103BD01001
TAX LOT 2S103B000300 TAX LOT 2SIO38DO1200 c PROPERTIES INCLUDED IN NOTE: ALL PROPERTIES IN THE REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT
TAX LOT 2S103B000400 TAX LOT 2SIO38001300 n REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT ARE ZONED R4.5
TAX LOT 2SIO38000600
TAX LOT 2S103B000700 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER WALNUT & 121ST
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION Ai~
wMW
cue mYYQiYK OVM„pll /1L 4 on
Mef >~eK .roc~,em~.rw,i-n 1, RI
't
J..I.L'J 41Y11Ji i i w r+.,aa
I
ANN
ST
up ®rts p ®j
es no su p ct
Blan Nor spo s
BR C N N N
y
c\ y SW BAMBI LN
Z 0 i w
N Q
~i y
2
SW ER OL ST ~
e-
T
i
TIPPITT P
CARMEN ST
z cf)
1
June 12, 2000
Informational Hearing
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
THAT THE TI+GARD CITY COUNCIL
AT A MEETING ON
TUESDAY, June 27, 2000 AT 7:30 PM
IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER
13125 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD OR 97223
TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement District No. 18.
The Tigard City Council will conduct an informational public hearing to hear testimony
on the proposed Reimbursement District formed to install sewers in.SW Walnut Street
and SW 121 sc Avenue.
Both public oral and written testimony is invited.
The public hearing on this matter will be conducted as required by
Section 13.09.060 of the Tigard Municipal Code.
Further information and the scheduled time for this item during the Council meeting may be
obtained from the Engineering Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 or by
calling 639-4171 extension 373.
Veim\walnul and 121 st-raim18\notice of Informational cc mtg.doc
2S103BD-00901 2S103BA-00600
ALLEN STEVEN P & ELIZABETH A GAARDE RICHARD J & DOROTHY A TR
12540 SW 121ST AVE PO BOX 231298
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97281
2S10313D-01300 2S103BA-00700
BERGQUIST R KELLY GAARDE RICHARD J 11 AND
MERRILL M JUDITH O
12660 SW 121ST 11825 SW WALNUT
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223
2S103BD-00300 2S103BC-00700
BLEDSOE ROBERT C & CAROLYN S HAHN DOUGLAS K & KATHLEEN A
11800 SW WALNUT ST 12220 SW WALNUT ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223
2S103BB-07000 2S103BD-01001
BOLEN RICHARD L & GERALDINE L HUGHES JACK D TR &
12185 SW WALNUT ST HUGHES LEONE M TR
TIGARD, OR 97223 12580 SW 121 ST AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S103BA-00800 2S103BD-00600
BOOTH DAVID & MARY P JOHNSON DONALD R & CYNTHIA D
11865 SW WALNUT ST 11970 SW %"/ALNUT ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223
2S10313D-00400 2S103BA-01003
BRAK EDITH A KLEIN CHARLES H &
823 S JUNIPER DR SHARON J TRS
MOSES LAKE, WA 98837 12065 SW WALNUT ST
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S103BC-00100 2S103BD-01200
BREITENSTEIN ROBERT W JR & NIX LOY CARL MARSHA A
MARGARET M 12630 SW 121ST
12525 SW 121ST AVE TIGARD, OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S103BD-00200 2S1031313-00602
CAPPOEN RAYMOND J NORMAN JACK J JR AND
SUZANNE MARYJ
11710 SW WALNUT ST 11930 SW WALNUT
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223
2S10313C-00400 2S103BA-00500
DANIELS ROLLAND J ROGERS EUGENE P
12200 SW WALNUT ST KATHERN J
TIGARD, OR 97223 11695 SW WALNUT ST
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S103BC-00300 2S10313C-00600
FLEWELLYN WILLIAM D & SUANNE E STEVENS JAMES H AND LYNN N
12180 SW WALNUT ST 12605 SW 121ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223
i
2S103BA-01001
THOMPSON AGNES JANE
PO BOX 793
ST HELENS, OR 97051
2S103BD-00700
VENEZIO BONNIE J
4030 ELM ST
DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515
2S103BC-00200
VRVILO WANDA 1
12565 SW 121ST
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S10313D-00800
WOOD ROLAND R
12070 SW WALNUT
TIGARD, OR 97223