The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 02/24/1998 CITY ®F TIG OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 24, 1998 COUNCIL MEETING ILL T E TELEVISE i:ladm%jolccpkt3.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd„ Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 Revised 2/20/99 II CITY OF TIGARD IX, PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and sho.,ld be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the CounL'I meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecon,munications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 6:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above: 639-4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING FEBRUARY 24,1998 - 6:30 PM 6:30 PM • STUDY SESSION > Discuss Trees 200 Report > EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council R Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 7:35 PM 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) 7:45 PM 3. CONSENT ACFNDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve Council Meeting Minutes: January 20 and 27, 1998 3.2 Receive and File: Park Study Advisory Committee Information 3.3 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement for the Washington Square Regional Center Grant with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) - Resolution No. 98 --2~- COUNCIL. AGENDA - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 2 • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 7:60 PM 4 CALL FOR PUBLIC INPUT: STOP SIGNS AT SW BURNHAM STREET AND SW MAIN STREET • Staff Report: City Engineering Department • Public Testimony • Council Questions/Comments • Council Motion: Approving the installation as a permanent one; or, calling for the removal of the installation. 8:10 PM 5. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-0001 A request to annex two parcels totaling 3.25 acres of unincorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R-4.5. LOCATIONS: 11300 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 02000 and 11370 SW Fonner Street, WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1., 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges C. Staff Report: Community Development Department d. Public Testimony (Applicant, Proponents, Opponents, Rebuttal) e. Council Questions f. Close Public Hearing g. Staff Recommendation h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 98-04 Resolution No. 98- I.a _ COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 3 8:20 PM 6. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - FISHER/PASSMORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-0002 A request to annex one parcel of .92 acres unincorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R-4.5. LOCATIONS: 12920 SW Walnut Street; WCTM 2S104AD, Tax Lot 03300 APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1., 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.16 and 18.138. a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges C. Staff Report: Community Development Department d. Public Testimony (Applicant, Proponents, Opponents, Rebuttal) e. Council Questions f. Close Public Hearing g. Staff Recommendation h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 98- 05 Resolution No. 98- 1 q 8:30 PM 7. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - SCHMIDTKE CARMEN STREET ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-0003 A request to annex one parcel of .35 acres of unincorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and tc change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R-4.5. LOCATIONS: 11760 SW Carmen Street; WCTM 2S103BD, Tax Lot 02300 APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1., 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges C. Staff Report: Community Development Department d. Public Testimony (Applicant, Proponents, Opponents, Rebuttal) e. Council Questions f. Close Public Hearing g. Staff Recommendation h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 98- 0X0 Resolution No. 98-_L,,5' COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 24, 1999 - PAGE 4 8:40 PM 8. REVIEW OF PROPOSED POLICY TO FORMALIZE THE CITY COUNCIL'S APPROACH TO ANNEXATION • Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion • Council Consideration: Resolution No. 98--LUL 9:10 PM 9. DISCUSSION ON POLICY ALLOWING PRIVATE STREETS AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE STREETS. • Staff Report: Community Development Department • Council Discussion • Council Consideration: Motion to approve or disapprove the policy recommendation proposed. 9:40 PM 10. NOWAGENDA ITEMS vim, L .~-Yf turuE ~L L T 6 CIE-_j_7 9:30 PM 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. 10:10 PM 12. ADJOURNMENT i:\ad m\cathy\cca\980224.doc COUNCIL. AGENDA -FEBRUARY 24, 1998 -PAGES ~Ip Agenda Item NO.- I Meeting of TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -FEBRUARY 24, 1998 • STUDY SESSION > Meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m. by Mayor Jim Nicoli > Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli, Councilors Paul Hunt, Brian Moore, and Ken Scheckla. > Staff Present: City Manager Bill Monahan; City Engineer Gus Duenas; Community Development Director Jim Hendryx; Asst. to the City Manager Liz Newton; Engineer Brian Rager (regular session); Legal Counsel Tim Ramis; Public Works Director Ed Wegner; and City Recorder Catherine Wheatley. > Greenspaces Bill Monahan, City Manager, agreed that staff should meet to discuss issues with the greenspaces and then present their report to Council. > Discuss Trees 2000 Report Ed Wegner, Public Works Director, reported that the Council goal to plant 2000 trees in Tigard by the year 2000 has been expanded to approximately 8000 trees (7644 trees plus 500 trees already planted). He said that this goal was part of the visioning process for the aesthetics of the community as well as good natural resources and flood plain management. He mentioned the planting of 550 trees in Englewood Park by volunteers on "Let's Make a Difference Day", and the annual tree planting along Fanno Creek by the Friends of Fanno Creek, scheduled for March 7 in Englewood Park. Mr. Wegner reviewed the three work tasks of the program: planting trees in parks and open spaces, working with schools and public agencies, and a street tree program. He mentioned the work of Jeff Munro, Public Works, and Joe Percival, consultant, in mapping out the areas where trees should be planted. Joe Percival, Percival & Associates, said that the over 21 sites in the city that he and Mr. Munro visited broke down into two basic types: developed parks and natural areas. He explained that adding trees to the developed parks added shade, physical structure, beauty and other environmental benefits. Adding trees to the various kinds of natural areas would reinforce the function of the natural area, add some diversity, and rectify some of the damage that has occurred over time. Mr. Percival said that they considered tree size and tree quantity in evaluating where trees should be planted. He explained that in the parks they would plant larger trees (3-inch caliper) and fewer of them than they would plant in the natural areas. In natural areas (without irrigation) they would plant many small trees in imitation of nature's scattering of numerous seeds. Councilor Scheckla asked if trees in parks would be planted deep enough so that the roots did not cause problems for maintenance crews. Mr. Percival said that the depth for planting trees CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 1 .w was fairly standard, regardless of size. He explained that they chose tree species for a location that were suited to the environmental conditions of that location. For example, alder trees near the Tualatin because they could survive the annual winter flooding, and red oaks and ornamentals in Summerlake where there was no flooding. Mr. Percival commented that Washington County was basically a wetland for nine months of the year, so they selected species that were used to high water tables and nonoxygenated deep soil. Mr. Percival reviewed the recommendations. He mentioned the need to hire a staff arborist or urban forest manager to handle the increasing number of natural area and forested properties the City was rapidly acquiring. He stated that while the City park staff was excellent, they did not have the necessary expertise in urban forest management. Mr. Percival said that they recommended a program for the replacement of trees that were removed, a program to eliminate the non-native nutria and control the beavers (who caused much tree damage), and the implementation of guidelines for water quality facilities. He spoke to the use of trees to help mitigate against invasive species, such as blackberries, ivy, and reed canary grass. He recommended implementing the recommendations of the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan, as Tigard was located in that watershed. He mentioned the upcoming Tigard Parks & Recreation Master Plan also. Mr. Percival reviewed their action plan. He explained that they divided Phase 1 into two steps: spring planting of ornamental trees and trees along the edge of the greenway and the Cook Park wetland, and fall planting (after the blackberries have been removed during the summer in order to give the trees a good headstart). He said that they were looking to plant over 1800 trees by January 1999 in Phase 1. Councilor Scheckla asked what bidding procedures would be used to purchase the trees, and whether donations were acceptable. Mr. Wegner explained that they would have three bids for the spring plantings in Summerlake Park and Cook Park. Depending on the amount of money estimated, they would use either a formal bidding process or get three quotes. He said that they would accept donations of nursery stock but not a tree that a homeowner wanted removed from his backyard. Councilor Hunt asked if the City would acquire the Thomas Dairy property soon enough to incorporate it into the program. Mr. Wegner said that they should have that property by late summer, and that they intended to plant there in the fall. Councilor Hunt asked if staff would install the ditches to replace the drain ditch. Mr. Wegner said yes. He commented that they hoped to have a perimeter row of trees planted in the wetlands boundary by mid-April or May. Councilor Rohlf asked how the nutrias would be handled. Mr. Wegner said that they have worked with the State to relocate the nutrias. He confirmed to the Mayor that they would put fencing around the smaller trees to protect them. Mr. Wegner commented that the Council would see in the budget an urban forester position and a second utility worker position (to work between Cook Park and general maintenance). Mr. Monahan noted that these positions were consistent with the five year plan. Mr. Wegner commented that now they had a guide for tree planting for use when volunteers CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 2 wanted a project. He said that after they bid out Phase 1, they would b,art c,n Phase 2, the schools. He stated that they would start on the street tree program after the urban forester was hired. He mentioned several issues involved in street trees, including maintenance, planting strips, irrigation, and who was responsible for maintenance. The Council discussed hiring the urban forester sooner than July 1 in order not to miss the season. Mr. Wegner said that staff could bring forward a budget adjustment request. Mr. Monahan mentioned that April joint meeting with the School District at which this topic would be discussed. He asked Mr. Wegner to send preliminary materials on the program to the District in advance. Councilor Scheckla asked to put on the joint meeting agenda a discussion of shared equipment with the District. Mr. Wegner reviewed the existing cooperative agreements between the City and other agencies (including school districts) to share equipment. Jack Polans; 1900 SW Queen Victoria Place, King City, asked if 8000 trees would improve the air quality by increasing the oxygen in the air. Mr. Percival said that the oxygen produced by trees was highly variable, changing with the age of the tree and environmental conditions. He commented that trees helped with flood control, mentioning that a well-matured forest stopped 20-30% of the rainfall from reaching the ground. He said that trees were not planted for today or tomorrow but for the next generation. Mayor Nicoli thanked Mr. rercival for his in-depth report, and expressed his appreciation for this tool the City could use with volunteers. Mr. Percival thanked Jeff Munro and Brian Embley for their help. Mayor Nicoli suggested taking the drawings from this report to the CITs for their information and review. He mentioned writing an article on this in the Cityscape also. Mr. Wegner commented that this report listed only general areas for plantings, and was flexible enough to avoid planting trees in a viewsheds or other unwanted places. > Dartmouth LID Mr. Monahan explained that the City received a letter from one of the property owners included in the Dartmouth LID assessment expressing the property owner's surprise at being included, as he had been excluded from it in 1984 through Ordinance No. 84-17. Mr. Monahan said that this was correct and that they had rc.a~ the assessment, redistributing the approximately $46,000 to the other property owners. He reviewed the properties now listed in the LID and those excluded. He said that they needed a new resolution to give staff the authority to send out revised notification to the property owners. The public hearing remained scheduled for March 17. Councilor Rohlf asked about the legal ramifications of this. Mr. Monahan explained that staff determined that they needed to adhere to the original Ordinance No. 84-17 provisions. Councilor Scheckla asked how the amount was redistributed. Mr. Monahan read the amounts of the remaining property owaprs from the first assessment and from the revised assessment. He "ref said that the total amount was in excess of $47,080. r , CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 3 Councilor Hunt questioned why three of the property owners paid less under the second assessment when a larger total was being distributed among them. Mr. Monahan said that that was how it worked out in the distribution formula, although he was not certain how the numbers were shifted around. He said that as staff received more information on the wetlands on these properties, it was possible that the assessments would change again. > Executive Session: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 7:14 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. > Executive Session adjourned at 7:29 p.m. > Mayor Nicoli reconvened the study session. Mr. Monahan stated that King City annexation questions were not on the agenda at this time. 1. BUSINESS MEETING • Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board Mayor Nicoli called the business meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. • Council Communications/Liaison Reports: None • Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items Mayor Nicoli noted the revised resolution for the Dartmouth LID. 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA > Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Way, King City, addressed the issue of King City annexation. He stated that the citizens of King City wanted to maintain the King City Civic Association Charter granted by the State in 1966, and that they would vote against annexation to any one. He asked the citizens of Tigard to vote against a King City annexation. Mr. Monahan explained that the City of King City wrote a letter to the City of Tigard requesting information on possible annexation because the King City City Council was evaluating public safety in their community. They were investigating whether to add public safety officers or annex to Tigard. He said that Tigard provided them the information on the tax rate as requested, and King City dropped their request for additional information. He stated that the City of Tigard has never said that they were interested in annexing King City, they were simply answering questions. > Darlene Wozniak, 14200 SW Fern Street, stated that she attended the preliminary neighborhood meeting on the proposed expansion of the Act III Tigard Cinemas to add six screens and a parking lot south of McDonald's on SW 72nd Avenue. She said that she asked City staff member Mark Roberts about the back street in that area that was included in the Tigard street plan to provide needed connectivity in the Triangle, and he said that it would not be required of Act III and that any appeal would be denied. Ms. Wozniak said that she understood that the back road would be required on the Cub CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 4 Foods/Waremart property and wondered why it would not be required of Act III. She pointed out that there was no connecting street on SW 72nd between Dartmouth and Hwy 99W to provide a circular traffic flow in the Triangle. She said that she supported the Act III expansion but would like this connecting road opportunity looked at also. Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel, advised the Council that they could not take a position on this issue, as it was potentially the subject of a land use application. He said that they needed to make sure that these comments were provided to all parties during the public hearing process. Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director, said that any application would be weighed against the requirements of the Triangle plan. > Gretchen Buchner, 13045 SW Jacob Court, stated that she has tried without success to reach ODOT concerning the timing of the traffic lights on Hwy 99W. She said that the increased traffic from the developments to the south and west has created a serious backup problem on the side streets intersecting with Hwy 99W. The lights allowed only three cars at the most through the intersection. She asked that the City explore this issue, since her "non-governmental" efforts have been unsuccessful, and she saw a real danger of a fatality in this situation. Mayor Nicoli stated that the City has recently applied for state or federal money to deal with the timing of the traffic signals on Hwy 99W. Ms. Buenher suggested that the lights switch to the pressure plate system at 8 pan. (instead of at 10 p.m.) because the traffic has subsided substantially by then, and then back to the timed lights sometime after 6 a.m., as a means of relieving some of the problem. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt the Consent Agenda. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") 3.1 Approve Council Minutes: January 20 and 27,1998 3.2 Receive and File: Park Study Advisory Committee Information 3.3 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement for the Washington Square Regional Center Grant with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) - Resolution No. 98-12 4. CALL FOR PUBLIC INPUT: STOP SIGNS AT SW BURNHAM STREET AND SW MAIN STREET ® Staff Report Gus Duenas, City Engineer, reviewed the installation in August of a temporary four-way stop at Burnham and Main as a means of slowing down speeding traffic, relieving the congestion from traffic by-passing Hwy 99W, and increasing pedestrian safety. He said that staff received only one negative comment since the installation, and that all others have been positive. He mentioned that the traffic on Burnham Street has increased by 1000 cars a day, possibly due to the easier left hand turn on to Main Street. He stated that while the traffic counts northbound on Main Street have not dropped significantly, the stop sign has significantly reduced the speed of CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 5 cars, and increased the ease of left turns onto Main from Burnham, Tigard, and Commercial Streets. He recommended installation of a permanent four way stop. Councilor Scheckla asked if staff received any feedback from the Fire District. Mr. Duenas said that while they have not received feedback directly from the Fire District, Mike Marr (the recipient of many comments on the stop sign) indicated that people felt that the emergency access onto Main Street and the side streets has been greatly enhanced. He observed that an orderly and predictable traffic movement on Main Street and the side streets would only enhance public safety vehicle movement. • Public Testimony > Mark Mahon spoke in support of keeping the stop sign. He said that those who regularly traveled Main and Burnham saw a marked improvement in the traffic flow on Main, and consequently took that route rather than cutting through the neighborhoods. • Council Questions/Comments Mr. Duenas confirmed to Councilor Rohlf that the stop sign has slowed speeds on Main Street. Councilor Rohlf said that he has noticed a marked improvement in the volume and speed of cars on Main Street. Councilor Moore commented that the slower speeds and increased pedestrian safety also benefited the merchants. • Council Motion Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to approve the installation as a permanent one. u Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") 5. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL): FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-0001 A request to annex two parcels totaling 3.25 acres of unincorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R-4.5. LOCATIONS: 1300 Former Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 02000 and 11370 SW Former Street, WCTM 2SI03AC, Tax Lot 2101. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. a. Mayor Nicoli opened the public hearing and read the hearing title. b. Declarations or Challenges: None c. Staff Report Mr. Hendryx reviewed the specifics of this annexation request for two properties totally 3.25 acres. He said that city services were available in Fonner Street, and that they received no negative agency comments on either the annexation or zone change request. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 6 d. Public Testimony > Ed Hunieutt asked that the developers of these properties be required to install a un,:orm fence along the back property line. He pointed out that three of the lots abutted his back property line. He contended that a uniform fence was more attractive than three different types of fences. Mayor Nicoli explained that the only issue before the Council tonight was the annexation request. He suggested that Mr. Hunicutt attend the neighborhood meeting developers were required to hold prior to making application for development. > Gretchen Buehner 13450 SW Jacob Court, expressed concern at the increased traffic that would travel on Walnut and 121St resulting from the new developments built on these annexed properties. She asked if the City had a plan to address these traffic concerns. Mayor Nicoli explained that the City has purchased the property at the intersection of Walnut, Fonner, and Tiedeman. The Engineering Department was in the process of redesigning the intersection with the intent of funding it through the next budget cycle. He pointed out that these were County roads but they were working with the County to address this problem. Ms. Buehner commented that the County did not have a good history of requiring developers to make road improvements. Mr. Duenas confirmed that there was a three-phase MSTIP 3 project for Walnut from 121St to 135th He said that the County was aware that this was a high priority, and Phase 1 - the intersection - was slated for design in 1999. Mayor Nicoli commented that under the City's urban services agreement with the County, they were allowed to earmark TIF funds for the urban services area. e. Council Questions: None E Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing g. Staff Recommendation Mr. Hendryx recommended approval of the annexation and rezoning of the property as outlined in the staff report. h. Council Deliberation: Ordinance No. 98-04 Resolution No. 98-13 Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Resolution No. 98-13. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 98-13, A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY REFERRED TO AS ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 98-0001, FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET AND ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF TIGARD AS DESC"iBED IN THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A AND FURTHER ILLUSTRATED IN ATTACHED EXHIBIT B. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Ordinance No. 98-04. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 7 The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 98-04, AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE, ZCA 98-0001, FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") 6. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL): FISHER/PASSMORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-0002 A request to annex one parcel of .92 acres of unincorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R-4.5. LOCATIONS: 12920 SW Walnut Street; WCTM 2S104AD, Tax Lot 03300. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. a. Mayor Nicoli opened the public hearing and read the hearing title. b. Declarations or Challenges: None c. Staff Report Mr. Hendryx reviewed the specifics of this annexation request for the .92 acre property located west of SW 121 st off of Walnut. He said that the applicant wanted to annex to comply with conditions of approval for a three-lot partition. He said that city services of sufficient size were available in Walnut Street, and that they received no negative agency comments on either the annexation or zone change request. d. Public Testimony: None e. Council Questions Councilor Rohlf asked if the owner of the other property was interested in annexing. Mr. Hendryx stated that staff routinely contacted adjoining property owners of an annexation request to see if there was interest, and this property owner did not come forward. f. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing g. Staff Recommendation Mr. Hendryx recommended approval of the annexation and rezoning of the property as outlined in the staff report. h. Council Deliberation: Ordinance No. 98-06 Resolution No. 98-14 Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Resolution No. 98-14. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 98-14, A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXA'T'ION OF TERRITORY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 8 REFERRED TO AS ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 98-0002, FISHER/PASSMORE WALNUT STREET AND ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF TIGARD AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A AND FURTHER ILLUSTRATED IN ATTACHED EXHIBIT B. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Ordinance No. 98-05. The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 98-05, AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE, ZCA 98-0002, FISHER/PASSMORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") 7. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL): SCHMIDTKE CARMEN STREET ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-0003 A request to annex one parcel of .35 acres of unincorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R-4.5. LOCATION: 11760 SW Carmen Street; WCTM 2S103BD, Tax Lot 02300 APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. a. Mayor Nicoli opened the public hearing and read the hearing title. b. Declarations or Challenges: None c. Staff Report Mr. Hendryx reviewed the specifics of this annexation request for one .35 acre property to access city services. He said that the request did include a portion of the right-of-way on Carmen Street. He said that city services were available to the property, and that they received no negative agency comments on either the annexation or zone change request. d. Public Testimony: None e. Council Questions: None E Mayor Nicoli closed public hearing g. Staff Recommendation Mr. Hendryx recommended approval of the annexation and rezoning of the property as outlined in the staff report. h. Council Deliberation: Ordinance No. 98-06 Resolution No. 98-15 Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Bunt, to adopt Resolution No. 98-15. i CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 9 11111111111111111 The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 98-15, A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY REFERRED TO AS ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 98-0003, SCHMIDTKE CARMEN STREET AND ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF TIGARD AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A AND FURTHER ILLUSTRATED IN ATTACHED EXHIBIT B. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to .opt Ordinance No. 98-06. The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 98-06, AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE, ZCA 98-0003, SCHMIDTKE CARMEN STREET ANNEXATION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") 8. REVIEW OF PROPOSED POLICY TO FORMALIZE THE CITY COUNCIL'S APPROACH TO ANNEXATION a. Staff Report Mr. Hendryx reviewed that the Boundary Commission would be dissolved at the end of this year with the hearings procedure changing in 1999 to the local governments holding the one and only hearing on annexations except for contested cases. He explained that Metro would hear contested cases for jurisdictional disputes only. He said that staff would keep the Council updated as the procedures were rewritten. Laurie Nicholson, Associate Planner, said that staff recommended continuing with the existing City policy of processing annexation requests initiated by the property owner. "Double majority" (the majority of property owners and the majority of voters) was the typical method used. She reviewed the other methods of "island" annexation, petition of 50% of the property owners and 10% of the registered voters, a Boundary Commission resolution, and health hazard. Ms. Nicholson said that staff recommended that the City no longer waive the $1160 local application fee, and that Walnut Island residents wishing to annex pay the Boundary Commission fee. She said that the effect of this proposal was annexation occurring incrementally over a long period of time. Councilor Hunt requested that the Council revisit this issue once the Boundary Commission dissolved and they knew what the new ground rules would be. Ms. Nicholson mentioned that the Metro attorneys were drafting to method of approach that cities would take for annexation. She said that Metro would take a iimited role in annexation, reviewing only jurisdictional dispute appeals. Mr. Ramis commented that they CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 10 would need to develop not only new ground rules but systems for recordkeeping since the Boundary Commission would no longer record the boundaries. Mr. Monahan noted that neighbors from the SW 106'' area were here tonight. He reviewed that Mr. Sanders and some of his neighbors had met with staff to discuss annexation to access city services and the sewer reimbursement district program. He summarized the Council discussion _ last week as while the Council did not object to property owners recently annexed using the sewer reimbursement program, they wanted to discuss the City annexation policy prior to giving direction to the neighbors. He said that the Council expressed a concern that incremental annexations of the Island might leave more people in the Island opposed to annexation than in favor of it, and make it more difficult for the City to annex the Island. Councilor Rohlf suggested using the "double majority" method to bring in the two properties in the area whose owners have not joined in the annexation request. Mayor Nicoli concurred. He supported proceeding with the sewer reimbursement district program for this neighborhood once they annexed. Councilor Scheckla asked how many people would hook up to the sewer. Mr. Monahan said that of the nine property owners interested in annexation, only one was not interested in hooking up. However since Mr. Sanders was already in the city, he raised the total number for a sewer reimbursement district participants to nine. Mayor Nicoli opened up the discussions to public comment. > Jim Flatters said that, counting Mr. Sander's property, there were 10 lots in this area that the neighbors thought would work for the sewer program. Only one of those was not interested in sewer. He reiterated that their main reason for requesting annexation was to access city sewer. Mayor Nicoli pointed out that annexation was no guarantee that the City would institute the sewer program, as that was a separate request. He reviewed the provisions of the sewer reimbursement program, mentioning that it left the choice of hook up to the individual property owner. Mr. Flatters said that they were concerned that they not be barred from using the program once they annexed simply because they were recently annexed. He said that they understood that there were no guarantees but they would like some assurances that once they annexed in, they could start the sewer program. Mr. Duenas reported that there was more than sufficient money in the sewer reimbursement district fund to pay for the two potential small projects. He said that staff was looking for a iarger project. b. Council Discussion Councilor Hunt said that he thought that they set up this program for exactly this circumstance, as a way to entice people into the city. He supported allowing the neighbors to use the program. Councilor Rohlf said that while he would not commit to anything right now, he saw no reason not to move forward. Councilor Scheckla asked about the timeframe for applying for sewer following annexation. Mr. Duenas said that they could do the annexation and reimbursement district application concurrently. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 11 1: Ms. Nicholson confirmed to Councilor Hunt that with the double-majority method, a single property owner opposing annexation could be brought in whether or not he/she wanted to annex. Councilor Rohlf suggested establishing a policy to force single property owners opposing annexation to annex when the majority in the area supported it. He spoke to cleaning up the "checkerboards." Mayor Nicoli said that he did not have a problem with the resolution. He spoke to the City looking into annexing the already developed eastern end of the Walnut Island when they considered the intersection improvements at Walnut/Fonner/Tiedeman. Councilor Hunt said that the possibility of forcing annexation on the Walnut Island was one reason why he wanted this issue revisited once the Boundary Commission dissolved. He commented that they had not done forced annexations because they had thought that the Boundary Commission would not support them. Jack Polans asked to set up an appointment with Mr. Hendryx to discuss several questions he had on this issue. c. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 98-16 Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Resolution No. 98-16. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 98-16, A RESOLUTION BY CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING CITY POLICY REGARDING ANNEXATION PROCEDURES. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") > Mayor Nicoli recessed the meeting at 8:45 p.m. for a break. > Mayor Nicoli reconvened the meeting at 8:56 p.m. 9. DISCUSSION ON POLICY ALLOWING PRIVATE STREETS AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE STREETS a. Staff Report Mr. Hendryx reviewed in detail the Code and Zoning Ordinance requirements for private streets, private storm drainage, and private street lights as discussed in the staff report (see attached). He explained that private streets were allowed outright for small subdivisions of less than six lots or through the planned development process for the Planned Unit Developments (PUD). Mayor Nicoli pointed out that Council saw two types of private streets: those that were built to look like a city street, and those that were not. He commented that people buying homes on private streets that looked like public streets often did not know that they were buying on a private street, and looked to the City for maintenance. Councilor Rohlf pointed out that private streets built to look like public streets might not have a substructure built to city standards. Mr. Hendryx used a series of slides to illustrate the two processes in which private streets were CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PA,--,,E 12 allowed. He reviewed the various reasons why private streets were allowed for subdivisions of less than six homes and for PUDs. He stated that private streets allowed a proposed small development to trade off access with other public standards in order to allow a greater number of lots than would otherwise be feasible, given the improvements of a public street. They allowed a PUD to create a planned environment through the application of flexible standards to allow application of new techniques and technology. Mr. Hendryx said that the Development Code gave a lot of discretion to the City Engineer in his review of the appropriateness of private streets in a given situation. It also required legal assurance for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a bonding maintenance agreement and the creation of a homeowners association. Councilor Rohlf commented that the mechanism for giving notice of private streets seemed to break down. Mr. Hendryx said that staff could not monitor developers giving notice of private streets. It was a case of "buyer beware." Mayor Nicoli commented that there were better mechanisms of notification, such as a deed restriction that would show up on a title report. Councilor Hunt pointed out that the majority of homebuyers did not read the title report. Councilor Moore expressed concern that the City not take on a responsibility that was not theirs. The homeowner was accountable when he bought the property, not the City. Councilor Hunt said that he disagreed. He spoke to eliminating private streets in PUDs, though allowing them for the less than six lot subdivisions. He cited two examples in Summerfield where people had not known that they were buying lots on a private street. Mayor Nicoli said that he agreed but spoke to making it clear through a deed restriction that even those streets were not public streets and required maintenance by the homeowners. Mr. Hendryx continued with the staff report. He reviewed specific standards for private streets in PUDs. He explained that since 1997, staff no longer required installation of street lights on private streets but had an unwritten policy of recommending them with the choice left up to the developer, although they still had to be metered separately from the city street lights. He said that beginning in 1997, storm drainage systems in private streets would no longer revert to the City after three years, although they still had to be built to public standards. Mr. Hendryx reviewed provisions for street width, parking, and addressing. He said that private streets had blue street signs as opposed to the green signs for public streets. He reiterated that private streets were required to be maintained by the abutting homeowners, and that the City had no responsibility for their maintenance and upkeep. Councilor Hunt asked why the street light policy changed in 1997. Brian Rager, Engineering Department, explained that after receiving complaints from developers regarding the requirement for street lights, staff researched the Code and found there was nothing requiring y the installation of street lights on private streets. So staff decided to back off and give the ' developer the option of installing street lights while at the same time recommending their installation for public safety reasons. He said that the lights still had to be on a separate meter system, as staff did not think that the public should pay for street lights on private streets or for storm drains on private streets. Mr. Hendryx mentioned several issues involved with the maintenance of private streets. He said that one reason the City refused to accept responsibility for private streets was the tendency for homeowners to fail to maintain the facilities on a regular basis, thus leading to greater costs in CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 13 the future. He pointed out that the deveioper set the street width, usually to allow onstreet parking on one side. However the City did not enforce parking on private streets. Mr. Hendryx reviewed the options available to Council. He pointed out that not allowing private streets at all created a difficult situation for small scale development and reduced the flexibility for PUDs. He commented that if a developer could not build to his proposed density, then the city might have to make up the difference elsewhere. He reviewed the implications of a policy of selectively allowing private streets, pointing out the need for clear definitions and criteria. Mr. Hendryx recommended maintaining the current policy with the understanding that developers were choosing private streets to avoid certain public standards, and therefore, the City was not responsible for their maintenance, either now or in the future. He recommended requiring all developers of private streets to install street lights and leaving the decision on their continued operation up to the homeowners. Mr. Hendryx recommended that the maintenance and costs of storm drainage systems in private streets also be the responsibility of the developer and the future homeowners association. He said that the City would accept responsibility to maintain the water and sanitary sewer lines in the street. He mentioned a conversation with the County regarding this issue, and that the County had the same issues as the City. Although the County was probably more flexible in allowing private streets, it had a policy that private streets remained private, and that the County would not take responsibility for them in any situation. He said that as long as the Council had a consistent policy, the policy was workable. Mr. Rager presented a series of slides illustrating private streets in Tigard, both in small subdivisions and in PUDs. He pointed out that a concrete apron and a blue street sign delineated private streets from public streets. He reiterated that the City did not enforce parking on private streets. He noted the reduced setbacks in PUDs. Councilor Hunt asked what the restrictions were for cul-de-sacs. Mr. Rager said that currently the standard allowed a 400 foot long cul-de-sac. Mr. Hendryx mentioned that they were reducing that to 200 feet to comply with Metro standards to provide greater connectivity. Mr. Rager continued with the slide presentation. He commented that hammerhead turn arounds were allowed only on private streets, never on public streets. He mentioned the fire code requirement that any dead end road over 150 feet long have a turn around. Nick Wilson, 12752 SW Winterlake Dr., Planning Commission Chair, stated that the Commission was also concerned that people did not know that they were buying on private streets, and that homeowners associations seldom adequately maintained shared facilities. He pointed out that as Tigard built out, only the more difficult sites were left. He suggested less density as an alternative to disallowing private streets. He said that the Commission concurred with staff's recommendation to maintain the current policy. He observed that people purchasing single-family detached dwellings were the least likely to suspect that they were on a private street. Mr. Wilson recommended modifying the staff recommendation to disallow private streets in a single-family detached house situation. Gretchen Buchner, 13045 SW Jacob Court, stated that she was a real estate lawyer. She concurred with Councilor Hunt that people did not read the title report. She mentioned the Real CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 14 Property Disclosure Law passed by the state legislature in 1993 that provided a "laundry list" of things that a property seller had to disclose at the time of the transaction. It required signatures of both the seller and the buyer. She suggested adding disclosure of private streets to the list. Ms. Buehner said that, based on her experience as a lawyer and a Portland Variance Committee member, she has observed that cities did not as diligently watch a development when private streets were installed as when public streets were installed. She concurred that many times property owners did want to return streets to the City when there was a problem. She pointed out that the slides all showed relatively recent developments that did not yet have problems with their private streets but in 30 to 50 years, the situation would change. She suggested addressing in their plan the long-term maintenance of private streets. She mentioned that emergency vehicles could not get up roads not properly maintained. Mr. Ramis mentioned that while reviewing a title report recently, he saw a maintenance agreement that caught his attention because of its "dramatic" language. He suggested rewriting their maintenance agreements in such a way as to grab people's attention. b. Council Discussion Mayor Nicoli commented that some of the projects shown on private streets were affordable housing, something the City was being pressured to provide more of. He said that he liked the idea of not allowing private streets on detached single-family homes. He supported providing some opportunity for private streets in other situations, such as attached housing. Councilor Scheckla expressed concern that the Council not rewrite the policy so as to place an extra burden on staff. Councilor Moore supported retaining the current policy of allowing private streets in appropriate situations. He conceded Councilor Hunt's point about the lack of notification to buyers but contended that the City should not become the "private street police." He mentioned several options for warning homebuyers, including changing the blue sign to read "private street," a deed restriction, or requiring the developer to put up a maintenance bond to insure maintenance of private streets. He said that he thought that private streets were necessary. Councilor Moore supported the unwritten rule used by staff now of allowing the developer the choice of installing street lights. He stated that if the street lights were not in the city right-of- way, then the city should not be paying for maintenance or energy. He mentioned that homeowners could work with the local utility company to get street lights put in, if the developer chose not to do so. He pointed out that they have had only a couple of requests in the past two years for the City to take over private facilities. Councilor Scheckla concurred with Councilor Moore's comments. Councilor Rohlf stated that he opposed private streets. He concurred with Ms. Buehner's comments that in 40 years, they would see more requests as the roads degenerated over time. He supported requiring street lights on private streets as a safety issue. He argued that allowing substandard development today only created problems for tomorrow. He said that while he could see the advantages of private streets for small subdivisions and PUDs, it was infill development that gave rise to the increased density and traffic that people did not like. Councilor Hunt concurred with Councilor Rohlf. He supported eliminating private streets in CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 15 PUDs, although he said that he would go along with allowing them in small developments. Councilor Moore expressed his concern that by not allowing private streets, they handcuffed property owners who could not develop their properties with a full sized public street. Mayor Nicoli proposed continuing this discussion to the March 10 meeting. The Council agreed by consensus. 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS > Mr. Monahan said that this resolution was intended to correct an error made on the initial proposed assessment. Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Resolution No. 98- 17. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 98-17, A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS, DIRECTING THAT NOTICE BE SENT TO BENEFITING PROPERTY OWNERS AND ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR THE DARTMOUTH LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, SUPERSEDES RESOLUTION NO.98-11 TO CORRECT EXHIBIT A, THAT LISTED PROPERTY OWNERS ON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL THAT WERE EXEMPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 84-17. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, > Councilor Hunt asked staff to try to find a compromise between the two positions on private streets. 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Cancelled 12. ADJOURNMENT: 10:00p. CCbthUU-)1t Atte Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder or, City of Tigard Date: 3 /a 4 l CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 16 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice TT 9043 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising `City of Tigard • 0 Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. '4rigard,Oregon 97223 ° 0 Duplicate Affidavit *Accounts Payable a AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ass. 1, Kathy Snyder being first duly sworn, depose and sax that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of th - ' me s a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the City Coun -i 7 Board Meeting a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for CLE successive and consecutive in the following issues: February 19,1998 Subscribed and sworn t e me this 19th day of February,1998 OFFICIAL SEAL ROSIN A. SURtiIEEl3lA N t Public for Oregon I NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: I COMMISSION NO, 062071 My COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 18, 2001 AFFIDAVIT The following meeting highlights are published for your information. Full agendas may be obtained from the City Recorder, 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639-4171. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING February 24, 1998 6:30 P.M. (study session) 7:30 P.M. (business meeting) TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON • Trees 2000 Report • Receive Public Input: Stop Signs at Burnham & Main Streets • Policy Review: Annexation ® Policy Review: Private Streets, Private Street Lights b Public Hearings - Annexation: Fisher/Passmore - Fonner Street - Annexation: Fisher/Passmore - Walnut Street - Annexation: Schmidtke - Carmen Street • Executive Session TT9043 - Publish February 19, 1998. I NMI ANk COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice TT 9 0 3 4 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising 'City of Tigard ° ❑ Tearsheet Notice ° 13125 SW Hall Blvd. e Tigard,Oregon 97223 ❑ Duplicate Affidavit 'Accounts Payable AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. 1, Kathy Snyder- Aft being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard -Tualatin Times a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the vnne Change-Fisher/Passmore Fonner St. a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: February 12 , 19 9 8 OFFICIAL SEAL JACQUEUNE ARELLANO NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. 301011 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 9. 2001 I , f Subscribed and swo to be ore me this 19th clay of Fehruary, 1998 V Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT - Bill ~Sa't0llo ing aril! ba coniri&rid b~tzfe Tigard City Council on.Tues- day, February 24, 2998, at 7:30 V%-., at the Tigard,Civic Center - Town Hall Room, 13125 SW Hall' Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code and any rules and procedures adopted by the Tigard City Council, or rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.30. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing on the request accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the Hearings Authority and all the parties to respond on the request, precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information is available at City Hall and may be obtained from the Community Develop- ment Director or City Recorder at the same location, or by calling (503) 639-4171. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0001 > FISHER/PASSMORE F'ONNER STREET ANNEXATION < REQUEST: The property owners are requesting to annex 3.25 acres of residential property into the City of Tigard and change the zoning from County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fortner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 02101; and 11300 SW Fonner Street, WCTM 2S 103AC, Tax Lot 02000. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard R-4.5 from County R-5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.136. 17 A 'f r FRL ITT _I L 1I'IT FT-1 M034 -Publish February 12, 1998. COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 664-0360 Notice TT 9 0 3 5 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising OCi ty of Tigard ® ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. •Tigard,Oregon 97223 ° ❑ Duplicate Affidavit *Accounts Payable • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. 11 Kathy_Sn) do-r being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theTi g?rd-Dual atin Times a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the Zo e Change-Fiissher_/Pasgmo P Walnut St - a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: February 12,1998 OFFICIAL SEAL JACQUELINE ARELLMO NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. 301011 Kr' tu MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 9, 2001 Subscribed and swor to ~eforemethis~1~21_h_day of Eehruary,1998 Notary Public for Oregon My Commission xpires: AFFIDAVIT - The following will be considered by the Tigard City Council on Tues- day, February 24, 1998, at 7:30 P.M., at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall Room, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code and any rules and procedures adopted by the. Tigard City Council, or rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.30. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing on the request accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the Hearings Authority and all the parties to respond on the request, precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information is available at City Hail and may be obtained from the Community Develop- ment Director or City Recorder at the same location, or by calling (503) 639.4171. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0002 > FISHERMASSMORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to annex .92 acres of property into the City of Tigard and change the zoning from County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5. LOCATION: 12920 SW Walnut Street; WCTM 2S 104AD, Tax Lot 03300. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard R-4.5 from County R-5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.136. IJ: '.Jr, fl M 5:.,,• - , r 4 :t i l t~ ,~a 4 ' i• ' ~ . n 1' .d 's t ~ti• M n r1C a .rV 1' n ' Y ri'S 1 ~ It 1 , + ~ { r. ;alb; 'r r +onJ !if 1 +Y +1, M•:.~f 1 :t~xl i J.h 3 `~fe 3 Ji: ' ~ i 'IT9035 - Publish February 12, 1998. COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice TT 9036 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising *City of Tigard 0 E3 Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. p °Tigard,Oregon 97223 ' Duplicate Affidavit *Accounts Payable Y AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )as' 1, Kathy AnVdpr being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard-TuaI ai- n Times a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at-Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the Zone Change =Snhrnidtke Annexation a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONF. successive and consecutive in the following issues: February 12 1998 OFFICIAL SEAL JACCVWNE AREUANO t NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. 301011 My COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 9, 2001 Kam, 7(-'= A Subscribed and swor o before me thisl2th day Q.f February, 1998 i Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT - MI-I'l-I yo- Sol N The following wilt be considered by the Tigard City Council on Tues- dw,; February 24, 1998, at 700 P.M., at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall Room, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard; Oregon 97223. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code and any rules and procedures adopted by the Tigard City Council, or rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.30. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing o,► the request accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the Hearings Authority and all the parties to respond on the request, precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of App is based on that issue, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a cpmment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information is available at City Hall and may be obtained from the Community Develop- ment Director or City Recorder at the same location, or by calling (503) 639-4171. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0003 > SCHMIDTKE ANNEXATION < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to annex .35 acres of property into the City of Tigard and change the zoning from County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5. LOCATION: 11760 SW Carmen Street; WCTM 2S103BD, Tax Lot 02300. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard R-4.5 from County R-5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.136. - ,'ray 87 _ F i . •c t. M036 - Publish February 12, 1998. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, 11VX* X9 ):]fhA IA begin first duly sworn, on oath, depose and y: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number (s) 9%- U q . q1~ - 0 S i C M- NO which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated'a- ~ Qyi l a copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the _ 6,1 day of M N,\ j~- , 19'A 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. Tigard Library, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 3. Tigard Water Department, 5777 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon I WO Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 R m • l.c Notary Public Or Oregon -1.1t c~f Al •;s,.; M Jr) ANN HAYES NW Ah e 0, Irll Ic 0111 r.oN My Commission Expires: "N1 2:4 5 'rl.IMl! SIGN I XI'llo ""AY-'tQ!Nl I: \Adm\Jo\,rrp+m. doc CITY OF TIGARD, ORE,,GION J. • ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0001 - FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on February 24, 1998 to consider a zoning designation for two (2) parcels of land located south of SW Fonner Street, across from SW 113th Place; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 1998 the Tigard City Council approved a Resolution to forward the proposed annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission; and WHEREAS, the zoning district designation recommended by Planning Staff, as set forth in the attached staff report and in Section 1 below, is that which most closely approximates the Washington County land use designation while implementing the City of Tigard's existing comprehensive plan designation of Low Density Residential; R-4.5. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Upon annexation, the affected properties shall be designated as follows: Tax Maps/Lot Numbers 2S 103AC, Tax Lot 02000 2S 103AC, Tax Lot 02101 Current Comprehensive Plan Designation New Comprehensive Plan Designation Wash. Co. R-5 Low Density Residential Current Zoning New Zoning Wash. Co. R-5 Tigard R-4.5 SECTION 2: This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By UWAl1MOUS vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this c Q'd^ day of , 1998. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this daf 1998. /7 y s icoli, Mayor Ap roved as to form: Cl Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 98- i:\cirywide\ordlzca98.01.ord Page 1 of 1 Julia P H 11-Feb-98 1:53 PNI CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 98-05 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0002 - FISHER/PASSMORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on February 24, 1998 to consider a zoning designation for one (1) parcel of land located south of SW Walnut Street between SW 128th and SW 131st Avenues; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 1998 the Tigard City Council approved a Resolution to forward the proposed annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission; and WHEREAS, the zoning district designation recommended by Planning Staff, as set forth in the attached staff report and in Section 1 below, is that which most closely approximates the Washington County land use designation while implementing the City of Tigard's existing comprehensive plan designation of Low Density Residential. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Upon annexation, the affected property shall be designated as follows: Tax Map/Lot Numbe: 2S 104AD, Tax Lot 03300 Current Comprehensive Plan Designation New Comprehensive Plan Designation Wash. Co. R-5 Low Density Residential Current Zoning New Zoning Wash. Co. R-5 Tigard R-4.5 SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By U4(41 i/MottS vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this o?V4--'O' day of_ 1998. atherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this , day o , 998• J s icoli, Mayor App ved as to form: City . ttorney Date ORDINANCE No. 98- &In i:AciVMd6ord\zca9M2.ord Page 1 of I Julia P H 11-Feb-98 l :43 PM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 98.0(0 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0003 - SCHMIDTKE ANNEXATION) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on February 24, 1998 to consider a zoning designation for one (1) .35 acre parcel and adjoining public street right-of-way located at 11760 SW Carmen Street; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 1998 the Tigard City Council approved a Resolution to forward the proposed annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission; and 1 WHEREAS, the zoning district designation recommended by Planning Staff, as set forth in the attached staff report and in Section 1 below, is that which most closely approximates the Washington County land use designation while implementing the City of Tigard's existing Comprehensive Plan designation of Low Density Residential. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Upon annexation, the affected property shall be designated as follows: Tax Map/Lot Number 2S 103BD, Tax Lot 02300 Current Comprehensive Plan Designation New Comprehensive Plan Designation Wash. Co. R-5 Low Density Residential Current Zoning New Zoning Wash. Co. R-5 Tigard R-4.5 SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By U4&24[htV J vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this c24'P day of 1998. ,~{CCatherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this cx~t " day 1998. 3 icoli, ayor Approved as to form: 11\\\ ~Y C City Attorney Date 2t~-rl' ORDINANCE No. 98- U~t i:kitrMdc%ord\zca98-03.ord Page I of 1 Mark_r I1-Feb-98 2:57 mill NINE - SCHMIDTKE ANNEXATION ZPARDIT A (ZCA) 99-0003 ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE I WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8 CARMEN PARK AS RECORDED IN BOOK 23 PAGE 23 OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SUBDIVISION RECORDS; THENCE N 00° 10' 00" W A DISTANCE OF 216.98 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SW. CARMEN STREET; THENCE N 890 50' 00" E, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 91.68 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID CARMEN PARK; THENCE S 00'37'00" E, ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 217.00 FEET TO THE SE. CORNER OF SAIJD LOT 8; THENCE S 89° 50'00" W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 8, A DISTANCE OF 88.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. i eng!johnrM23003bd do 41.0~741 ' 6600 ° 7800 XHIBI 5100' y S 34 1 7300 7700 5200 6500 b a - G~ I,e~a 8 LL~e 2l 31 w v 33} Q~P ~ '.100 5300 = 197 -41.- s'7 9 5400 I 7500 y y\ ` o + ~ 1 4141 j° 20OG 10 t 20 :141 32 ya?9L 1804 I= t1 aI ; Saco s z 16 aI •s b 10 ilea ".w •r eLa 1 rop 8 I.6300' e~.ea8700 ••+s+•t~a,a a ate-r a -3:a-mss ~a-w a 'a 5500 19 465-'C. i 4 0 13 scam "-k s I` 4141 I a { ».ee I ~ t ~ off w 7 1A1. 74 9 5600 " - lz NI r l~ z 12 6zco E. a~~a to 00'41.., y I. 18 41rn 4141.41 :41141+ s n.n a rgacT :i' w nt' a. Va 2235 CARMEN EET: 6100 ROSSO ■ s-ia•ata 17 « 410 ,RO m tpp 4 74132 { ej Iie 27cC 26)0 Z_ZOO 2400 .5700 13 - 'c00 4 R Rpm - F +v.a. I _ g s 6 7 Seoo } c)w _ ~ i= 5900 ,I i - : 14 In I. :5 if sin I arst eMSQ I p f00 tQ0 414141 • 41 c rora~ c :w ~ a oea IMITI AL 7alnr 4400 .lO er. a= 1.59ae ~ Jot. L 40 AC. ' •zt soot ~ Q1 •r 4.41410 1 'c Umm rt L - 4141+71 j, f -WAC vi I 2378 nn .I I 1 a i , ~ i X100 3800 ' 4101 41200 1 430C i L~ :Sae. :Jac. ,i . JZA- ' 419410. e 7 mac. 1411 I I ~ 1 411 ~ ' a~- " I i S 'N TL 4141- ~ 41- FONNER STREET= ~ ao 0 ~'te CASE RI®M & a7J1. ,L. ZOA 90-0003 EXHUBUT SCHMIDTKE AHD TION AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE : February 24, 1998 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Manager prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. STAFF CONTACTED NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC yes G 2e rc Aj c-0 v riZPi ►=►C. L/~NT~ v c y-) U 7- ~lv -M A Lx-lz% e- s i ea -j cb. 4-s ZX~, I XLA'>,Z-,J-" \Li:\.a,d-\Vo\v1*1t9ht.doc Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement oral testimony. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 DATE: February 24, 1998 CALL FOR PUBLIC INPUT: STOP SIGNS AT SW BURNHAM STREET AND SW MAIN STREET PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS V AGENDA HEM NO. 4 PLEASE PRINT Pro nent - (S In Favor) -Opponent - (S ainst) Name, Address and Phone No.f Name, Address and Phone No. 7 / J_r lei e~ 6 -JO y- c~lnZ_ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement oral testimony. AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 DATE: February 24,1998 PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-0001 A request to annex two parcels totaling 3.25 acres of unincorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R4.5. LOCATIONS: 11300 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 02000 and 11370 SW Fonner Street, WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRI'T'ERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1., 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Conununity Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTS Y ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS AGENDA REM NO. S PLEASE PRINT Pro nent - (S In Favor) Opponent - (S ainst) Name, Address and No. Name, Address and Phone No. fcc Name Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 13U`~~. S 1,> Cc C~ 2,1 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. a~ Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement oral testimony. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 DATE: February 24, 1998 PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - FISHER/PASSMORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-0002 A request to annex one parcel of .92 acres unincorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R-4.5. LOCATIONS: 12920 SW Walnut Street; WCTM 2S104AD, Tax Lot 03300 APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1., 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 PLEASE PRINT Proponent - (S In Favor) O nent - (S ainst) Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement oral testimony. AGENDA. ITEM NO. 7 DAVE: February 24, 1998 PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - SCHMIDTKE CARMEN STREET ANNEXATION - ZCA 98- 0003 A request to annex one parcel of .35 acres of unincorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R-4.5. LOCATIONS: 11760 SW Carmen Street; WCTM 2S103BD, Tax Lot 02300 APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1., 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS r AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 PLEASE PRINT Proponent - (SpLA~g In Favor) Opponent - (S Against) Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. r~s rP ~'O AGENDA ITEM # iGf\ FOR AGENDA OF %2/ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE King City Preliminary Inquir~Regarding Annexation to Tigard PREPARED BY: Bill Monahan DEPT HEAD OK I CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL The City of King City has requested information so that it may consider options available to it to deliver police services. Annexation of King City to Tigard is an option, although the legal mechanism to accomplish such a move would need to be studied. The issue before the Council is whether the City of Tigard should analyze the pros and cons of annexation or merely respond to the inquiry at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the February 18, 1998, letter sent by Tigard to King City constitutes the full extent of our response to King City's request unless and until King City indicates that the initial financial impacts of annexation to Tigard do not rule out annexation as an interest of King City. INFORMATION SUMMARY King City is evaluating the need for increasing the City's public safety budget. City Manager Jane Turner wrote to Tigard requesting Tigard tax information and other financial details. Based on Tigard's tax rate and debt service, upon annexation, King City residents would be required to pay an additional $.9851 in permanent tax rate and $.6093 in debt services. Thus, the owner of a $100,000 property would have an additional tax burden of $159.44. City staff members are evaluating the other questions posed by Jane Turner in her letter; however, rather than go into great detail when the financial costs are already significant, staff will refrain from completing the analysis until requested to do so. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Advise King City that the City of Tigard is not interested in annexing King City at this time. 2. Complete analysis of the questions posed by King City be iore the Tigard Council indicates any interest. 3. Take no action. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A FISCAL NOTES If King City properties are all annexed into Tigard, the Tigard permanent tax rate of $.9851 per $1,000 would be applied to $127,708,702 of "new value." In addition, the City debt limit of $.6093 would be applied. Thus, Tigard would receive $203,618.75 per year in additional revenue until the debt service is retired. From that point on, Tigard would receive $125,805.84 based on present valuation. The cost of delivering service to the present King City area has not been calculated at this time. i Aadm\cathy\co uncil\kcan nx.doc MMNEIII February 18, 1998 CITY OF TIG D OREGON Jane M. Turner, City Manager City of King City 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City, OR 97224-2693 Dear Jane: Thank you for your letter of February 9, 1998, making inquiries to the City regarding annexation of King City to Tigard. I have forwarded copies of your letter to the City Council for their information. In addition, I have sent a copy to our Finance Department, Public Works, and Police. The appropriate department will review each of your questions. Since Question No. 1 seems to be the threshhold question, I thought that by responding to Question No. 1, you may be able to determine the level of interest the City Council has in pursuing this matter further. Upon review of the response to Question No. 1, please let me know if we should devote time to analyze further Questions 2, 3, and 4. Finance Director Wayne Lowry has advised me that the total assessed value of property in King City for the current year is $127,708,702. Your permanent tax rate is $1.5281. In comparison, Tigard's valuation is $2.7 billion, with our property tax at $2.5132. Wayne has advised me that you have no debt service levies, while Tigard's levy is $.6093. Under Measure 50, if the entire area of King City is annexed into Tigard, Tigard's tax rate would be substituted for that of King City. The increase in permanent tax rate is $.9851. In addition, King City residents would contribute to paying for the City's debt service, an estimated $.6093. In total then, the increase to King City residents would be $1.5944 cents per thousand. Of course, Tiga.rd's dr:bt service changes based upon obligations incurred by borrowing. The present $.6093 burden will be retired as the City pays off general obligation bonds used to construct the Civic Center and carry out road improvements. You should be made aware, however, that the City is presently looking at expansion of City facilities, namely a new Library and public building construction and renovation. We are presently looking at placing a bond on the November, 1998 ballot. The present impact on a King City property owner of annexing to the City of Tigard would be $159.44 on a $100,000 home. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 Letter to Jane Turner February 17, 1998 Page Two Please let me know if you would like us to pursue obtaining answers to the other questions posed within your letter. We look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, William A. Monahan City Manager WAM\jh hAdoes%&doc 1 KING CITY 1.3 300 S.W. 116th Avenue. King City. nn:Gnn 9 i 2'a 2693 Phnne: (50:3) 6.49.4082 • FAX (503) t 319.3 T 1 FE6 11 o y3 } February 9, 1998 U Mr. William Monahan City Administrator City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Bill, The City Council, at its February 4, 1996 meeting, directed me to make inquiry to the City of Tigard regarding annexation of our community to Tigard. Specifically, major concerns are: 1. What would be the projected tax increase including special districts? 2. Would Tigard require upgrading of sewers and streets? If so, would that result in an assessment on the property owners? 3. What would be the level of police protection? 4. Would Tigard absorb existing police officers and staff? As you are aware, the City of King City has struggled to move forward. Our 1996 tax base did not pass and the Council anticipates placing a ballot measure, in November, for a 5 yr. Option levy for Public Safety. If these ballot measures continue to fail. then King City will have to consider other alternatives. Call me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, 9~. Jane M. Turner City Manager Agenda Item No. 3. ? Meeting of CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Park Study Advisory Committee PREPARED BY: J. Hendryx DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK iISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Receive and file. STAFF RECOMMENDATION n/a INFORMATION SUMMARY The Planning Commission and Park Study Advisory Committee are working with our consultant to update the Park Master Plan. The Advisory Committee consists of a number of interested groups and citizens. There are a several meetings and workshops scheduled to identify community needs and draft recommendations. Staff is sending the attached memo and flyers in an effort to keep Council informed of the plan and the progress being made. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED n/a VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY The Park Master Plan update is consistent with Tigard's visioning goal for park and recreation services. FISCAL NOTES n/a CITY OF TIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGA►RD TO: City Council FROM: Jim Hendryx DATE: February 5, 1998 SUBJECT: Park Study Advisory Committee As Council is aware, the Planning Commission has undertaken a Park Master Plan update. MIG and Associates were hired to assist in this effort. As part of that process, an advisory committee has been formed to help the Planning Commission in evaluating and making recommendations to the City Council. It is important to recognize that the Advisory Committee is made up of various representatives from interest groups including the Leagues and interested citizens. They are assisting the Commission in the development of the Park Master Plan. The Commission, with the committee's input, will make a recommendation to the City Council. I have attached a list of the people who are on the committee. A schedule of meetings, open houses, etc., is included. It is anticipated that the final report will be coming to Council in the spring for final action. Staff will keep Council aware and updated of various events and the progress throughout this major effort. t Parks Study Advisory Committee Connie Wilson Fay Cudal 13225 SW Village Glen Circle 15815 SW 88th Ave. Tigard, OR 97227 Tigard, OR 97224 Phone: 620-6009 Res: 684-8331 Eton Hudson MIG Tigard-Tualatin School District Sally McIntyre, Project Manager 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Jane Henderson, Project Planner Tigard, OR 97223 Larry Wight, Landscape Architect Bus: 684-2235 199 E. 5th Avenue Suite 28 Dave Nicoli Eugene, OR 97401 14180 SW 141st Ave. Bus: 541-683-3193 Tigard, OR 97223 Fax: 541-683-4079 Bus: 612-8200 e-mail: migeugene@pond.net Res: 590-0737 John Putman City Staff 6960 SW Clinton Duane Roberts, Planning Dept. Tigard, OR 97223 John Roy, Operations Dept. Res: 968-6703 Jim Wolf, Police Dept. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Chris Counts Tigard, OR 97223 9600 SW Riverwood Lane Bus: 639-4171 Tigard, OR 97004 Fax: 684-7297 Bus: 823-3181 e-mail: duane@ci.tigard.or.us Res: 639-5039 Barbara Aldrich 10965 SW Pathfinder Way Tigard, OR 97223 Res: 598-6739 Barbara Forrest 16672 SW 89th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Res: 620-7661 Scott White 14423 SW 130th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Res: 620-8213 Bus: 295-1909 iArpn/dr/park.ad Woodard Park Community Workshop 1:00 - 4:00 p.m., Saturday, March 7, 1998 Fowler School Room 10 (signs posted) f 11. 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard l~ The City of Tigard is developing a site and management plan for the 3-acre Woodard Park and the 7-acre parcel located along the northern edge of the park and recently put into public ownership. Please join us to help define goals for modifications to the existing park and for the use of the new property. The meeting will begin at Fowler School and from there move to the park site. For more information, call Duane Roberts at 639-4171. r . ny,fy ! City of Tigard Open House/Community Workshop Park' stem Master Plan by I)f , Thursday, February 12th, 7a00-9:00 p.m. Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. The City of Tigard is updating its Parks Master Plan. Please join us to discuss what you believe are the most important, park, recreation, and open space needs in the city and urban services area. Hope you can attend. Refreshments provided. For more information call Duane Rc:~,, at 639-4171. the master plan Develop Pla Develop Draft ImPrQVements Plan 'rocess Mast ds mendations poYe Capital imPi°Qeinent yw y er Recom Identify Cotnm unity Net cilities Strategies unity Leaders Maintenance Funding Existing Conditions Inlerviews with Conlin .Management inventory Community survey n space System Assessment Workshops Park and Ope entAsse Community Force Resources Assessor ssment ~ask fission ,Recreation anagetnent planning CDnun .Mamtenance and M Meetings City council Ptanmor, mn'is presentation Community sionl Ta ft Master city of S 1ge1n master Plan d sk Force Parts` Y Involve C o mmunity \Vorushop#6 A Meetings will -1bedra Task Force Plan wilt be eIL ,a~~~~~ ® Community workshop #5 formed to tented to the de th P P uncil OPpor t.CommnnitY ~Vorlrshop #S Reviewing the in P City council Review and praftPlanfor k ProvideofMaster Tigard e community #Z NVorkshop #3 thWoodard par for aPPCOVaI. nuent on a w review Community Reviewing Comrn NV°rksh°P Draft master plan Preliminary design Review and plan recom public is en' Review and dpA comment on the couraged tO attend for VJood schematic M mbefi w ill Tkshopunity #1 survey Heip define goals comment on Review and Master c n this session, within the context ropp$ed variety Watch your for modifications to Preliminary comment on of the Draft Master Plan for Woodard represent a Fall as 4ppp s of the plan 1998 f community Creati°~ n vision mailbox Woodard Pack and finding recommends o 'fhe will be scent city, master planning eons, including plan. Fark• Task Attend this first residenu to tm ged land, priority imPCDVe- Summer 1998 interests. and tea's` process. p Sinnnier1998 Force Will meet wo~hop ter chosen at random 1998 Spring 1998 ments to existing about the Ma' respond to a Alarch 1 . mainle- jointly w~~ the Plan. Tell u; what unity survey facilities, adage Com- Comn 'lance and m pia°n1A g rout You valaa most ar pan of the arks, mission throng ks, .1en l +,ster Plan menu si of lanf the pro That the e about par 1P recreation, and k" p ocess Your acquisition ton, r. for open space all ensure re ftects Space in 11 rd response will ensure asks, and Master Flan Help refine the Master plan future p ram needs, comet cts community community recreation PYOg ongoing to plan unity goats needs retie for par ks , development. letion and identify needs 1998 comp recreation facilities. Spring for facilities, aa and an d open space. Other issues, such mamtenan948 maintenance and Feb 12. strategies ft,nding also will be addressed. March 1998 r it AGENDA ITEM # 3.3 FOR AGENDA OF _-2 I awl P 8 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE City Council approval for the Intergovernmental Agreement for the Washington Saure Regional Center _ PREPARED BY: Laurie Nicholson DEPT HEAD OK I CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL ODOT is providing $160,000 in grant funding to hire consultants for the City to develop a long-range plan for the Washington Square Regional Center. City Council needs to approve the attached resolution, granting authority to Mayor Nicoli to sign the Intergovernmental Agreement when the City receives it. The City Attorney has reviewed the boiler plate agreement. City staff and ODOT have reviewed the workprogram and are in agreement over the contents of the workprogram and intergovernmental agreement. The consultant's work must be completed by June 30, 1999, so it is important for the Intergovernmental Agreement to be signed in a timely manner to allow adequate time for the work to be completed prior to the deadline. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council vote to approve the resolution, granting authority to Mayor Nicoli to sign the Intergovernmental Agreement with ODOT on behalf of the City. INFORMATION SUMMARY ODOT awarded the City of Tigard $160,000 in grant money to perform planning for the Washington Square Regional Center area. Last December, ODOT and City staff interviewed consultants to perform the work. The consulting team of Spencer/Kupper, Kittelson & Associates, and Lloyd Lindley were selected. City staff have subsequently entered into contract negotiations with ODOT. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED City Council could vote not to sign the Intergovernmental Agreement and consequently the City will not receive the grant. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY This agenda item will comply with Vision Task Force Goal #1: Accommodate growth while protecting the character and livability of new and established areas. It also complies with Strategy 3: Address planning and growth issues associated with the Regional Center. FISCAL NOTES Signing the Intergovernmental Agreement will allow the City to receive $160,000 in grant funding and City will pay $23,124.00 to meet the grant match amount. i:kitywidelwashsum.dot AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF FebruM 24, 1998 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Public Input - 4-Way Stop at Burnham and Main Streets PREPARED BY: A.P. Duenas DEPT HEAD OK 4~"rCITY MGR OK VVP1 ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the 4-way stop installed at the intersection of Burnham Street with Main Street remain as a permanent installation? STAFF RECOMMENDATION That Council provide opportunity for public input on the 4-way stop. That Council, by motion, approve the 4-way stop as a permanent installation. INFORMATION SUMMARY In August of 1997, the intersection of SW Burnham Street and SW Main Street was modified to provide for a 4- way stop. Prior to this, traffic on Burnham Street had to stop while Main Street traffic had the right of way. There were several problems at this intersection that needed to be corrected. The existing crosswalk on Main Street at Burnham Street was not safe for pedestrians. Traffic on Main Street rarely slowed or stopped for pedestrians in the crosswalk. During rush hour traffic, vehicles on Burnham Street wanting to turn onto Main Street had long backups and delays while waiting for a gap in the traffic on Main Street. Many motorists traveling northbound on Pacific Highway used Main Street as a detour around backed up traffic on the overpass. Warrants for the installation of a 4-way stop were met because the combined vehicular and pedestrian movements exceeded 200 units per hour and there was more than a 30 second delay on the side street (Burnham Street). The traffic volumes on three of the four legs were approximately equal. The 4-way stop was installed on a trial basis. The final decision as to whether or not the 4-way stop should remain as a permanent installation would be made by City Council at the end of the trial period after consideration of staff findings and public input. Traffic studies and random monitoring of the traffic through that area of Main Street indicates that the 4-way stop has apparently addressed all of the major problems at this intersection. Many pedestrians and business owners have expressed how much safer and easier it is to use the crosswalk now. Traffic studies show that northbound traffic volumes on Main Street have been reduced (from 5,200 to 4,800 ADT). This reduction in volume is especially observable during peak traffic hours, and most likely suggests that fewer motorists are using Main Street to bypass backed up traffic on Pacific Highway. In addition, the traffic volumes on Burnham Street have increased significantly (from 2,100 to 3,000 ADT) indicating motorists are finding it easier to turn left onto Main Street. Burnham Street traffic delays have been reduced significantly, and the movement of all traffic is much more orderly and predictable. Furthermore, motorists using Tigard and Commercial Streets are obviously now finding it easier to access Main Street as a result of the 4-way stop at Burnham. In summary, the 4-way stop has addressed the problems at the Main Street/Burnham Street intersection, and has enhanced traffic flow throughout the the rest of Main Street. It has reduced the amount of traffic that has utilized Main Street as a bypass to 99W, and has allowed traffic on Burnham, Tigard and Commercial Streets easier access to the businesses in downto Nn Tigard. Finally, it has encouraged more and safer pedestrian activity along Main Street by allowing for orderly crossing at the marked crosswalks. The 4-way stop has met the objectives set out prior to implementation and should remain as a permanent installation. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Remove the 4-way stop installation and restore the original configuration. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY This traffic revision meets at least two vision task force goals: Growth & Growth Management, Goal to Accommodate growth while protecting the character and livability of new and established areas, strategy Address the Tigard Town Center and areas designated as Corridors in the 2040 Growth Plan (Action Plan to address pedestrian issues in the Town Center). In addition, Transportation and Traffic Goal to Improve traffic safety, strategy to Discourage through traffic on local streets. FISCAL NOTES The 4-way stop was designed by in-house engineering staff and installed by in-house street crews. There were minor costs incurred for curb installation by contract, and for materials needed to complete the installation. All costs were covered through the City's operating budget. 11ci tywide\s.\b=nmpt.d. 1 r;r~Sr,a'ao3~t= P. February 23, 1998 To: Bill Monahan City Manager From. Mike Marr Bill, 1 will not be able to attend the City Council meeting tin February 24, 1 believe the CottllCil Agenda includes a review of the stop signs at Main Street and Kurnhain Street intersection. Please convey to the Council my observations. With the installation of the stop signs at the Main and Burnham intersection, our downtown has experienced the following: Reduced vehicle sliced on Main Street Much greater pedestrian safety improved flow of traffic, with balance in all directions (the back-ups on Burnham are significantly reduced) Better safety for emergency vehicle movement l have heard nothing but praise from other business/property owners for this improvement. The couple of ewlccims which were expressed prior to the installation do not appear to have materiali7.ed. And while there was one accident recently which I know of. I believe it was the result ol'other circumstances, not the stop signs. In fact, given that the Stop siglIN were in place, the speed of one of the vehicles was very slow and possibly prevented the seriousness of the accident from beiti~ worse. We still occasionally have traffic backed up on Main Street when drivers are attempting to escape Pacific Highway congestion, but it is no worse than it was prior to the installation. The advantage we now have is that when this occurs, it does not affect side street traffic (Burnham, Tigard Avenue, Commercial Street) as badly as before. It is my suggestion that the City maintain the Stop Sign approach. 1 do not feet that anv sigttiCicant improvement could be accomplished by spending City dollars to electronically signalize this intersection. Those dollars can go to ineet other needs. Please extend my appreciation to the City Council and Staff. AGENDA ITEM FOR AGENDA OF: February 24, 1998 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Zone Change Annexation (ZCA) 98-0001 - Fisher/Passmore Fonner Street Annexation PREPARED BY: Julia Powell Hajduk DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK i ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the Tigard City Council forward to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission a request to initiate annexation of two (2) parcels consisting of a total of 3.25 acres located at 11300 and 11370 SW Fonner Street, south of SW Fonner Street, across from SW 113th Place? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached Resolution and forward the request for annexation to the Boundary Commission and adopt the attached Ordinance to assign comprehensive plan and zoning designations to the subject properties in conformance with the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. INFORMATION SUMMARY The proposed annexation consists of territory comprised of two (2) parcels of land, totaling 3.25 acres which is contiguous to the City of Tigard. Both properties are currently developed with a single-family residence. Both properties have also gone through separate pre-application conferences and desire annexation in order to facilitate further development of the properties. Attached is a Resolution initiating annexation and an Ordinance to change the comprehensive plan and zoning designations from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R-4.5. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Deny the request. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY This request is consistent with Growth & Management "Goal 2." FISCAL NOTES Since the subject territory is within the City of Tigard's Active Planning Area, the City is responsible for paying the Boundary Commission application fee of $605 by City Council Resolution. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY is\citywide\sum\un98-Ol.surtj Page 1 of 1 Julia P H 12-Feb-98 9:06 AM Agenda Item: Hearing Date: February 24, 1998 7:30 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TIGARD Community Dewbp unt FOR THE CITY OF TIGARM OREGON Shaping ABetarConnnattrty SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE(S): FILE NAME: FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION Zone Change Annexation (ZCA) 98-0001 PROPOSAL: To annex two (2) parcels totaling 3.25 acres of un-incorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential; R-4.5. APPLICANT: Fred Passmore OWNER: SR Turner Construction, L.L.C. 7501 SW 195th Place 8835 SW Canyon Ln, Suite 408 Aloha, OR 97007 Portland, OR 97225 OWNER: Fisher Properties Trust OWNER: Carol Williams PO Box 11370 9155 SW Rambler Lane Portland, OR 97211 Portland, OR 97223 CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION: The current zoning designation is Washington County R-5. PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: It is recommended that the City of Tigard zoning designation of R-4.5 be designated upon annexation. The City's R-4.5 zone most closely conforms to the County designation of R-5 while implementing the City's Comprehensive Plan designation of Low Density Residential; R-4.5. LOCATIONS: 11300 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 02000 and 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 02101. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council find that the proposed annexation will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of the annexation by adoption of the attached Resolution and Ordinance. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 1 OF 4 ZCA 98-0001 - FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION 2/24/98 PUBLIC HEARING SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Each property is currently developed with a single-family residence. The property owners have each had a pre-application meeting with City Staff to discuss development of their property. The owners of Tax Lot 02000 are proposing a 16 lot subdivision and the owner of Tax Lot 02101 is proposing a two (2) lot partition. No formal applications have been filed for the proposals mentioned above and no other development cases were found to have been filed with the City for these properties. Vicinity Information: Tax Lot 02101 is .42 acres and Tax Lot 02000 is 2.83 acres. The total area being annexed, therefore, is 3.25 acres. The area being annexed is on the south side of SW Fonner Street, east of where Fonner Street jogs. The two (2) lots form a "U" shape. Property to the south of the area being annexed and the property inside of the "U" are both within the city limits of Tigard. The property also abuts city limits on the east and west, near the southern portion of the "U". The property to the north, across SW Fonner Street and on the east and west, near the northern portion of the "U", is outside of the Tigard city limits, but within Tigard's Active Planning Area. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is contiguous to property inside of the city limits zoned R-4.5. The property is bordered on the north, northwest and northeast by land that is outside of the Tigard city limits, but inside Tigard's Active Planning Area. The proposal is to annex into the City of Tigard in order to facilitate future proposed development and connect to city sewer. The owners/applicants have requested that the 3.25 acre site be annexed into the City of Tigard by means of the double-majority method. Representing the owners of more than half of the land (100%) and a majority of the registered electors (100%) of the area proposed to be annexed, this action has been initiated through the written consent of the property owners. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings: Policy 2.1.1: This Policy requires an ongoing citizen involvement program and is satisfied because the Central CIT and surrounding property owners have been notified of the hearing and public notice of the hearing has been published in a newspaper of general circulation. Policy 10.1.1: This Policy requires adequate service capacity delivery to annexed parcels and is satisfied because the City of Tigard Police, Engineering and Water Departments, USA and Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) have all reviewed the annexation request and have offered no objections. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2 OF 4 ZCA 98-0001 - FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION 2/24/98 PUBLIC HEARING Policy 10.1.2: This Policy pertains to boundary criteria for annexations and is satisfied. The property is surrounded on several sides by property that is inside the Tigard City limits. The annexation, therefore, will reduce an existing "island" of un-incorporated territory. The Police Department has been notified of this request and has no objection. The affected land is located within the City's Active Planning Area and is contiguous to the city boundary. Adequate services are also avaiiable to accommodate the properties. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based on the findings that follow. Section 18.136.030: This Section addresses approval standards for annexation proposals and is satisfied because: Service providers have indicated that adequate facilities and services are available and have sufficient capacity to serve the affected site. The applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and Code provisions have been reviewed and satisfied as previously indicated in this report. The City of Tigard zoning designation of R-4.5 most closely conforms to the County designation of R-5 while implementing the City's Comprehensive Plan designation of Low Density Residential. This also satisfies Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.1.3. The determination that the affected property is an established area is based on the standards set forth in Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Community Development Code and OAR 660-007-0005. Section 18.138: This Section provides standards for the classification of annexed land and is satisfied because the affected properties meet the definition of an established area and shall be designated as such. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering, Public Works, Police and Water Departments have all reviewed this proposal and have offered no comments or objections. The Tigard Police requested that Staff contact the surrounding property owners to ask if they wanted to join the annexation. Staff contacted these property owners and sent the necessary forms in the event they wish to modify the annexation. If they chose to annex and if Council supports their annexations, the Resolution and Ordinance can be amended to include these additional lots. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 3 OF 4 ZCA 98.0001 - FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION 2/24198 PUBLIC HEARING SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS The Metro Area Boundary Commission, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, Tualatin Valley Water District, PGE, NW Natural Gas, US West and GTE had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no objections. "BASED ON THE FINDINGS INDICATED ABOVE, PLANNING STAFF -RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98=0001 - FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER .STREET ANNEXATI~><V: February 10, 1998 PREPARED EX. Julia Powell ajduk DATE Associate Planner e-t-, 0J February 10, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorf DATE Planning Manager/ I:\curpin\ ulia\annex\zca98-01.dec STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 4 OF 4 ZCA 98-0001 - FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION 2/24/98 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM FOR AGENDA OF: February 24, 1998 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Zone Change Annexation (ZCA) 98-0002 - Fisher/Passmore Walnut Street Annexation W14-- ISSUE PREPARED BY: Julia Powell Haiduk~~ DEPT HEAD OK /MGR OK BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the Tigard City Council forward to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission a request to initiate annexation of one (1) parcel of land consisting of .92 acres located at 12920 SW Walnut Street, south of SW Walnut Street and west of SW 128th Avenue? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached Resolution and forward the request for annexation to the Boundary Commission and adopt the attached Ordinance to assign comprehensive plan and zoning designations to the subject property in conformance with the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. INFORMATION SUMMARY The proposed annexation consists of territory comprised of one (1) parcel of land, totaling .92 acres which is contiguous to the City of Tigard. The property is currently developed with a single-family residence. The property owner has received approval for a three (3) lot partition (MLP 97-0015) with the condition that the property be annexed. Attached is a Resolution initiating annexation and an Ordinance to change the comprehensive plan and zoning designations from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R-4.5. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Deny the request. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY This request is consistent with Growth & Management "Goal 2." FISCAL NOTES Since the subject territory is within the City of Tigard's Active Planning Area, the City is responsible for paying the Boundary Commission application fee of $225 by City Council Resolution. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY iAcitywidclsum\zca98-02.sum Page t of t Julia P H 10-Feb-98 4:55 PM • Agenda Item. Co Hearing Date: February 24. 1998 7:30 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL CRY OF TIGARD ty f FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON S6 Comrtura~~ABe~Devt'C~#nprrtzty SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: FISHER/PASSMORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION Zone Change Annexation (ZCA) 98-0002 PROPOSAL: To annex one (1) parcel of .92 acres of un-incorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential; R-4.5. APPLICANT: Fred Passmore OWNER: Fisher Properties Trust 7501 SW 195th Place PO Box 11370 Aloha, OR 97007 Portland, OR 97211 CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION: The current County zoning designation is R-5. RECOMMENDED ZONING DESIGNATION: It is recommended that the City of Tigard zoning designation of R-4.5 be designated upon annexation. The City's R-4.5 zone most closely conforms to the County designation of R-5 while implementing the City's comprehensive plan designation of Low Density Residential. LOCATION: 12920 SW Walnut Street; WCTM 2S104AD, Tax Lot 03300. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council find that the proposed annexation will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of the annexation by adoption of the attached Resolution and Ordinance. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 1 OF 4 ZCA 98-0002 - FISHER/PASSMORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION 2/24/98 PUBLIC HEARING SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The property is currently developed with a single-family residence. The property owner obtained Minor Land Partition approval (MLP 97-0015) to partition the lot into three (3) parcels. The approval had several conditions, one (1) of which was to annex into the City and hook-up to city sewer. No other development cases were found to have been filed with the City for this property. Vicinity Information: The subject site is .92 acres on the south side of SW Walnut Street. The property has approximately 132 feet of frontage on SW Walnut Street. The existing city boundary runs along the northern, eastern and western boundary line of the site. The site and the property directly to the south are within the urban growth boundary but outside of the Tigard city limits. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is bordered to the north, east and west by property inside of the city limits that are zoned R-4.5. The property is bordered on the south by land that is outside of the Tigard city limits but inside Tigard's Urban Growth Boundary. The proposal is to annex into the City of Tigard in order to comply with conditions of approval required by MLP 97-0015. The applicant has requested that the .92 acre site be annexed into the City of Tigard by means of the double-majority method. Representing the owners of more than half of the land (100%) and a majority of the rec?stered electors (100%) of the area proposed to be annexed, the applicant has initiated this action through the written consent of the property owners. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings: Policy 2.1.1: This Policy requires an ongoing citizen involvement program and is satisfied because the Central CIT and surrounding property owners have been notified of the hearing and public notice of the hearing has been published in a newspaper of general circulation. Policy 10.1.1: This Policy requires adequate service capacity delivery to annexed parcels and is satisfied because the City of Tigard Police, Engineering and Water Departments, USA and Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) have all reviewed the annexation request and have offered no objections. The staff report and decision for MLP 97-0015 indicates that adequate services are available and may be extended to accommodate the affected property. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2 OF 4 ZCA 98-0002 - FISHER/PASSMORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION 2/24/98 PUBLIC HEARING Policy 10.1.2: This Policy pertains to boundary criteria for annexations and is satisfied. The property is surrounded on all sides excluding the south, by property that is inside the Tigard city limits. The annexation, therefore, will reduce an existing "island" of un-incorporated territory. The Police Department has been notified of this request and has no objections. The affected land is located within the City's Urban Planning Area and is contiguous to the city boundary. Adequate services are also available to accommodate the property. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based on the following findings: Section 18.136.030: This Section addresses approval standards for annexation proposals and is satisfied because: Service providers have indicated that adequate facilities and services are available and have sufficient capacity to serve the affected site. The applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and Code provisions have been reviewed and satisfied as previously indicated in this report. The City of Tigard zoning designation of R-4.5 most closely conforms to the County designation of R-5 while implementing the City's Comprehensive Plan designation of Low Density Residential. This also satisfies Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.1.3. The determination that the affected property is an established area is based on the standards set forth in Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Community Development Code and OAR 660-007-0005. Section 18.138: This Section provides standards for the classification of annexed land and is satisfied because the affected property meets the -!efinition of an established area and shall be designated as such. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering, Public Works, Police and Water Departments have all reviewed this proposal and have offered no comments or objections. The Tigard Police requested that Staff contact the property owners directly north of the site to ask if they wanted to join the annexation. Staff has contacted these property owners and has sent the necessary forms in the event they wish to modify the annexation. If they chose to annex and if Council supports their annexation requests, the Resolution and Ordinance will be amended to include these additional lots. STAFF REPORT TO THE C! 'Y COUNCIL PAGE 3 OF 4 ZCA 98.0002 - FISHER/PASSMORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION 2/24/98 PUBLIC HEARING SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS The Metro Area Boundary Commission, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, Tualatin Valley Water District, PGE, NW Natural Gas, US West Communications and GTE have had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no objections. BASED ON THE FINDINGS INDICATED ABOVE, PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 970®02 - FISI;OR/PASSit ORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION. February 11, 1998 PREPARED BY: Julia Powell Hajduk DATE Associate Planner February 11, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdo DATE Planning Manager i:\curplny ulialannex\zca98-02.dec STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 4 OF 4 ZCA 98-0002 - FISHER/PASSMORE WALNUT STREET ANNEXATION 2/24/98 PUBLIC HEARING s AGENDA ITEM FOR AGENDA OF: February 24, 1998 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUVAGENDA TITLE Zone Change Annexation (ZCA) 98-0003 Schmidtke Annexation PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DEPT HEAD OK d/ CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the Tigard City Council forward to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission a request to initiate annexation of one (1) parcel of land consisting of .35 acres and adjoining public street right-of-way located at 11760 SW Carmen Street? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached Resolution and forward the request for annexation to the Boundary Commission. Also to adopt the attached Ordinance and to assign comprehensive plan and zoning designations to the subject property in conformance with the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. INFORMATION SUMMARY The proposed annexation consists of territory comprised of one (1) parcel of land totaling .35 acres that is contiguous to the City of Tigard. The property is currently developed with a single-family residence. The annexation has been requested to allow for future extension of sanitary sewer service to the property. The applicant or future property owners may propose a future Minor Land Partition of the property that would require sewer service. Annexation of the entire 50-foot-wide SW Carmen Street public street right-of-way in front of the property has been included because the existing sanitary sewer line is five (5) feet north of the existing right-of-way centerline, in accordance with standard engineering practice. Attached is a Resolution initiating annexation and an Ordinance to change the comprehensive plan and zoning designations from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R4.5. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Deny the request. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY This request is consistent with Growth & Management "Goal 2." FISCAL NOTES Since the subject territory is within the City of Tigard's Active Planning Area, the City is responsible for paying the Boundary Commission application fee of $225 by City Council Resolution. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY i:\citywide\sum\zca98-03.sum Page I of I Mark_r 11-Feb-98 2:44 PM • Agenda Item: Hearing Date: February 24, 1998 7:30 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COMM CITY OFTIGARD Community D¢tklopmmt FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ShapigABettcrCommunity SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE(S): FILE NAME: SCHMIDTKE ANNEXATION Zone Change Annexation (ZCA) 98-0003 PROPOSAL: To annex one (1) parcel of .35 acres of un-incorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive plan and zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard Low Density Residential; R-4.5. APPLICANT: Fred Schmidtke Sr. OWNER: Donald Campbell P.O. Box 250 11760 SW Carmen Street Forest Grove, OR 97116 Tigard, OR 97223 CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION: The current County zoning designation is R-5. RECOMMENDED ZONING DESIGNATION: It is recommended that the City of Tigard Zoning Designation of R-4.5 be designated upon annexation. The City's R-4.5 zone most closely conforms to the County designation of R-5 while implementing the City's Comprehensive Plan designation of Low Density Residential. LOCATION: 11760 SW Carmen Street; WCTM 2S103BD Tax Lot 02300. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council find that the proposed annexation will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL. of the annexation by adoption of the attached Resolution and Ordinancd. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 1 OF 4 ZCA 98-0003 - SCHMIDTKE ANNEXATION 2/24/98 PUBLIC HEARING Millilillill SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site has an existing single-family residence. The applicant approached the City with a request to annex the property into the City of Tigard in order to connect to city sewer and allow for a potential future Minor Land Partition of the property. No other development applications were found to have been filed with the City for this property. Vicinity Information: The site is bordered to the north, south and west by property outside of the city limits that are zoned Washington County R-5. The property is bordered on the east and southeast by land that is within the Tigard city limits. To the east the property is adjoined by the Hunter's Glen Subdivision. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject parcel is a lot that is within the Carmen Park Subdivision on SW Carmen Street. There is an existing single-family dwelling on the site. The property owner has requested annexation primarily to allow for future extension and connection to the existing sanitary sewer system that was developed as part of the Hunter's Glen Subdivision. The "as built" drawings for the Hunter's Glen Subdivision show the sewer line to have been developed five (5) feet north of the street centerline. For this reason, the annexation proposes to include the entire right-of-way width of SW Carmen Street along the frontage of the subject property. The applicant has requested annexation into the City of Tigard of the .35 acre site by means of the double-majority method. Representing the owners of more than half of the land (100%) and a majority of the registered electors (100%) of the area proposed to be annexed, the applicant has initiated this action through the written consent of the property owners. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings: Policy 2.1.1: This Policy requires an ongoing citizen involvement program and is satisfied because the Central CIT and surrounding property owners have been notified of the hearing and public notice of the hearing has been published in a newspaper of general circulation. Policy 10.1.1: This Policy requires adequate service capacity delivery to annexed parcels and is satisfied because the City of Tigard Police, Engineering and Water Departments, USA and Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) have all reviewed the annexation request and have offered no objections. Adequate services are available and may be extended to accommodate the affected property. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2 OF 4 ZCA 98.0003 - SCHMIDTKE ANNEXATION 2124/98 PUBLIC HEARING _1111ME 111111111 Policy 10.1.2: This Policy pertains to boundary criteria for annexations and is satisfied. The property is adjoined to the east and south east by property that is inside the Tigard City limits. The annexation, therefore, will reduce an existing "island" of un-incorporated territory. The Police Department has been notified of this request and has no objection. The affected land is located within the city's urban planning area and is contiguous to the city boundary. Adequate services are also available to accommodate the property. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based on the following findings: Section 18.136.030: This Section addresses approval standards for annexation proposals and is satisfied because: Service providers have indicated that adequate facilities and services are available and have sufficient capacity to serve the affected site. The applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and Code provisions have been reviewed and satisfied as previously indicated in this report. The City of Tigard zoning designation of R-4.5 most closely conforms to the County designation of R-5 while implementing the City's Comprehensive Plan designation of Low Density Residential. This also satisfies Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.1.3. The determination that the affected property is an established area is based on the standards set forth in Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Community Development Code and OAR 660-007-0005. Section 18.138: This Section provides standards for the classification of annexed land and is satisfied because the affected property meets the definition of an established area and shall be designated as such. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering, Public Works, Police and Water Departments have all reviewed this proposal and have offered no comments or objections. The Tigard Police requested that Staff contact the property owners directly north of the site to ask if they wanted to join the annexation. Staff has contacted nearby property owners that adjoin or would adjoin the revised City Limits and have sent the necessary forms in the event they wish to modify the annexation. If they chose to annex and if Council supports their annexations, the resolution and ordinance will be amended to include these additional properties through a separate action. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 3 OF 4 ZCA 98-0003 - SCHMIDTKE ANNEXATION 2/24198 PUBLIC HEARING SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS The Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, PGE, NW Natural Gas and GTE have also reviewed the proposal and have no objections. ` ASE® OId Tl°iE FINDINGS INDICAT D ABOVE, . 0LA 1NINC S'fAl=F REC, NIMENOS ~ PpFlt?VA1. F : ICE CHANGE ANNEI~ATfON (ZCA),58, Q083 ...$CH MJPTKE ANNEXA7, ION. February 11, 1998 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DATE Associate Planner February 11, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers orff DATE Planning Manager is\curplnUnark_r\annex\zca98-03.dec STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 4 OF 4 ZCA 98-0003 - SCHMIDTKE ANNEXATION 2124198 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM # CJ FOR AGENDA OF -.21-21/ 1-2 9 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE City annexation policy PREPARED BY: Laurie N. DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL. To adopt a resolution formalizing City Council's approach to annexation, which planning commission has already reviewed and recommended approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council approve the subject resolution. INFORMATION SUMMARY City Council and Planning Commission have agreed to update the City's policy regarding annexation. The policy is as follows: 1.) For property owners hooking up to USA sewer, the City will obtain waivers of non-remonstrance in exchange for extraterritorial extension of sewer services. This means that the City will annex this property at a later period. Our plan is to initiate these annexations, the first part of next year. 2.) The City will continue the practice of requiring annexation for property owners who wish to connect to City sewer. One change will be that the City will actively review and annex properties that have signed waivers of non-remonstrance. The second change will allow property owners to annex simultaneously with a development application, or to complete a development application prior to annexation, as long as the annexation is complete prior to the recording of the final plat. 3.) The final recommendation is that beginning July, 1998, annexation applicants will be required to pay a city application fee and the boundary commission fee. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1.) City Council can vote to approve the Resolution, as submitted 2.) City Council can vote to approve the Resolution, with recommended changes 3.) City Council can deny the resolution FISCAL NOTES If the City approves the resolution, $1,160 can be collected from each applicant beginning July, 1998 and the City will also save revenue that would have to be used for Boundary Commission application fees. The Boundary Commission fees vary based on the applicant's parcel size. iAcitywidc\mmxfee.sum a lay l~ ~ CxJ-Q S~-f e e t5 31 L ' c!a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON /Uo n_ ~4y Z/aq At RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS, DIRECTING THAT NOTICE BE SENT TO BENEFITED PROPERTY OWNERS AND ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR THE DARTMOUTH LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (SUPERSEDES RESOLUTION NO. 98-11 TO CORRECT EXHIBIT A THAT LISTED PROPERTY OWNERS ON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL THAT WERE EXEMPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 84-17) WHEREAS, the Dartmouth Local Improvement District project has reached the Assessment stage. Tigard Municipal Code Section 13.04.060 requires that a proposed assessment be prepared and presented to the City Council in a resolution. The resolution adopts the proposed assessment, directs that property owners be notified of the proposed assessments and that a public hearing be set to consider objections. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The final costs of the improvements total $4,576,837.01. Such costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefited properties according to the allocation formula set forth in the Harper Reghellis report dated March 7, 1997, as shown on the proposed assessment roll, Exhibit A, of this Resolution. SECTION 2: Notice, in accordance with Tigard Municipal Code Section 13.04.060, shall be given to all owners of property benefiting from the improvements of the amounts proposed to be assessed. SECTION 3: A public hearing is hereby scheduled for March 17, 1998, beginning at 7:30 p.m. at Tigard City Hall to consider objects to the proposed assessments. PASSED: This day of 1998. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder - City of Tigard i:\adm\cathy\cou ncil\lidres. doc RESOLUTION NO. 98-_ Page 1 Dartmouth Street LID Assessment Roll Palest Dartmouth Dartmouth Net Developable Area Street Street Area (Prior Zoning Within Added-Width Center 70-Feet To Added-Width Trafflrc Percent LID Right-ol•Way Right-ol-Way Welland Right-ol•Way Zoning Generation Assessment ol Total Boundary Dedication Dedication Area Dedication) Designation Factor' Rate Assessment Assessment Tax Ma Tax Lot + acres . acres • acres I. acres net acres (trips) tr -acres S Pacific Highway Fronting Parcels 1.3219 0.00000% $0.00 1S136CD 1700 0.8132 0.8132 C-G 0.00 0.00 0.000009: $0.00 1S136CD 1800 0.1738 0.1738 C-0 0.00 0.00 0.000009: 50.00 1S136CD 1900 0.3349 0.3349 C•G 0.00 0.00 0.000009: $0.00 Costco Parcels 14.6998 26.75805% $1,224,672.18 1S136CD 2004 0.2488 0.0165 0.2323 C-G 4.00 0.93 0.422819: 518351.51 1S136CD 2200 12.7545 0.2523 12.5022 C-G 4.00 50.07 22.75774'/. St,041584.53 2S1lBA 200 9.7204 7.7551 1.9653 C-G 4.00 7.97 3.577509: 5163736.15 Warernart Parcels 13.4269 24.44100% $1,118,624.67 1S136CD 2000 6.3805 1.3892 _ 0.2759 4.7155 _ C-G 4.00 18.88 8.583619:_ $392857.74 1S136CD 4200 0.5935 0.0729 0.1280 0.5384 C-0 4.00 2.16 0.98010% $44857.70 1S136CD 4300 3.5384 0.0952 1.7450 1.8885 C.G 4.00 7.56 `3.437719: $157338.56 1S136DC 2503 0.3198 0.3198 C-G 4.00 1.28 0.58211% 526642.27 tS1 36DC 2504 0.3167 0.3167 C-0 4.00 1.27 0.57656% $26387.89 1S136DC 4500 3.6015 0.1794 _ 3.9809 C-G 4.00 15.94 7.216389: 5331665.11 1S1 36DC 4600 1.4904 0.1766 1.6670 C•G 4.00 6.68 1034539: 5138885.39 Pollock Parcels 6.4726 7.90851% $365,666.64 1S136DC 4400 1.9109 1.9109 C•G 4.00 7.65 3.47837% $159199.50 1S136DC 4402 0.5279 0.5279 C-G 0.00 0.00 0.00000. $0.00 IS13600 7500 _ 0.3897 0.3897 C-P 1.00 0.38 0.177149: 58107.11 1S136DD 7600 0.5775 0.5775 C•P 1.00 0.58 0.26249% $12013.65 2S11AA 2800 0.1719 0.1719 C•P 0.00 0.00 0.00000'/. $0.00 2S11AA 2900 0.8770 0.8770 _C•P t.00 0.88 0.398619. $18243.59 2S11AB 100 a25 1.3247 2.0177 C-0 4.00 8.08 3.67290% $168102.57 ro % Martin Parcels 22.4202 40.81145% $1.067,073.52 O 2S1 18A 100 1.5521 0.6575 0.3331 0.5614 C-0 4.00 2.25 1.02187% 546774.11 G F'• 2S1 18A 101 5.8333 0.6080 0.4308 4.7945 C-0 4.00 19.20 8127449: 5399440.85 rt rr N- 2S1 IBA 300 14.4087 1.1905 13.2182 C-0 4.00 52.84 24.060999: $1,101,232.2 3 0. > 2S11BA 401 3.8461 3.8461 C•G 4.00 15.40 7.001049'. $320426.35 Dartmouth Street Center 70 Fast Right-of-Way Dedication Parcels 0.0000 0.00000% $0.00 OZ 1S136CD 4400 0.6898 0.6098 0.0000 C•O 4.00 0.00 0.00000% 50.00 + 1S1 360C 4700 0.0885 0.0885 i 0.0000 C•G 4.00 0.00 0.000009: $0.00 ILD Totals: 74.7022 0.5241 3.4329 13,4520 58,3414 220.00 100.00000% $4,576,837.01 T ' A value o(leio indicates a non-assessed patcel at Pacific Highway due to lack of benetit. I 1 ~dy sPSS M 1 aia~~ 1 TIGARD 2000 TREES R ID n ID EIXL- 01%-T 1 ~ Tigard, Oregon 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 e ~ ]FebruaPy, '98 1 1 1 IGARD 2000 TREES REPORT Prepared for: City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.Q. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 972223 Prepared by: Percival Associates 2863 S.E. Waverleigh Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97202 February, 1998 NORM TABLE OF CONTENTS descrtntion page numbers) Introduction 1 - 3 General Recommendations 4-6 Site Specific Recommendations 7-35 Figure 1 - City Wide Map /Site Location Map Benchview Greenway 8 Figure 2 - Benchview Greenway SchematicTree Planting Plan Bonita Road Greenway 9 Castlehill Greenway 10& 11 Figure 3 - Castlehill Greenway Schen:aticTree Planting Plan Colony Creek Greenway 12 Figure 4 - Colony Creek Greenway SchematicTree Planting Plan Commercial Park 13 Cook Park 14 - 16 Figure 5 - Cook Park SchematicTree Planting Plan Dover Landing-Pick's Landing- Landing- Willowbrook Farm Greenways 17 Figures 6 and 7 - Dover Landing-Pick's Landing- Willowbrook Farm Greenways SchematicTree Planting Plan Englewood Park 18 & 19 Figure 8 - Englewood Park Schematic Tree Planting Plan Fanno Creek Park 20 & 21 Figure 9 - Fanno Creek Park SchematicTree Planting Plan Genesis-Pathfinder and Terrace Trails Greenway 22 Figures 10 and I I - Genesis-Pathfinder and Terrace Trails Greenway Table of Contents - 1 9713tb1c.nts SchematicTree Planting Plan Gentlewoods Greenways 23 Grant Greenway 24 Figure 12 - Grant Greenway SchematicTree Planting Plan Greenburg Greenway 25 Hillshire WoodsGreenways 26 Jack Park, Jack Creek, Summer Creek, and Fowler Greenways 27 & 28 Figure 13 -.Jack Park... SchematicTree Planting Plan Scheckla Greenway 29 Figure 14 - Scheckla Greenway SchematicTree Planting Plan Summerlake Park 30 & 31 Figure 15 - Summerlake Park SchematicTree Planting Plan Tigard Street Greenway 32 Figure 16 - Tigard Street SchematicTree Planting Plan Winterlake Greenway 33 Figure 17 - Winterlake Greenway SchematicTree Planting Plan Woodard Park 34 Figure 18 - Woodard Park SchematicTree Planting Plan 114th Storm Drain Outlet 35 Figure 19 - 114th Storm Drain Outlet SchematicTree Planting Plan Appendices Appendix A - Tree Planting Recommendation: Quantity and Cost Summary Appendix B - Tree Planting Details B-1: Tree Planting in Natural Areas (details A and B) B-2: Tree Planting in Lawn (detail C) Appendix C - Implementation Phase 1: Estimate of Probable Construction Costs Appendix D - Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Excerpts Table of Contents - 2 9713tb1c.nts v ro v M r m o` I~ P p®p ~ `'R P INTRODUCTION Trees contribute to the beauty and health of our community in a number of ways. However, trees must often be removed to make way for the building of roadways, homes, and businesses. The city of Tigard enacted a tree removal fee to supply funds for replacing these trees. The purpose of this study is to identify locations in the community for planting these replacement trees. Money from the "tree planting" fund will be used to implement these recommendations. Initial discussions identified a variety of places where additional trees plantings might take place (e.g.: schools, along streets, parks, greenspaces...) Each type of site requires a different evaluation and tree planting recommendation process. The length of time and number of interest groups varies significantly with each of the types of sites. This study looks only at parks and City owned Green Spaces to identify locations for planting replacement trees. These are sites and areas where identifying tree planting recommendations are the simplest and can be most quickly implemented. Conducting studies for tree plantings on other public properties (e.g.: schools) and along streets will take more effort to organize and coordinate. These studies will involve the community, school district, and other governing organizations directly in the process of identifying programs and locations for additional tree plantings within the city. These are tasks which will be part of future efforts. During our examination of Tigard's parks and greenway we noted that these lands could be divided into to categories, each with it's own set of criteria for identifying opportunities for planting trees. The first category was the developed park lands. Trees in these areas provide visual interest, help to define space, shade park users, as well as providing the usual benefits of trees in our environment. However, in this built environment trees must be very carefully selected and located so as not to interfere with park use and overly complicate maintenance tasks. Trees in this type of area must be compatible with the aesthetics and character of the park setting. The second category of area are the city"s'natural areas'. Tigard's inventory of such lands includes hillside forests, wooded stream corridors, and various types of wetland and riparian environments. The condition of these lands vary greatly. Some are very healthy and relatively undisturbed environments which need little if any enhancement. Others have been severely impacted by natural events or human activities and are in need of significant remedial action. Tree plantings in these natural areas serves to enhance and reinforce the natural functions of these environments. Trees can widen the diversity of plantings and related habitats. Trees often provide environments which inhibit the growth of aggressive plant species (e.g. blackberries and Canary-Reed grass) reducing the maintenance work related to controlling such problem plants. Trees help shade water and absorb nutrients, both of which act to enhance water quality. Trees intercept falling rains and thereby reduce the high peaking nature of urban streams. Trees help to hold soils and slow down the flow of flood waters thus helping to reduce soil erosion. Trees also provide visual screening of the built environment surrounding these urban green spaces. This enhances the feeling of'getting away to nature' for the users of these areas. While we were looking at the various sites we kept these aims and benefits in mind and used them as guides for developing our specific tree planting recommendations. The recommended installation size of trees varies significantly between the'natural areas' and 'developed' park lands. Trees planted in 'natural area' are recommended to be small in size but large I 9713rept.fnl 4 in quantity. We expect to have a significant percentage of plant failure in these areas. There is no irrigation water available in these areas. This will cause fatal stress to many trees during the dry summer season. The smaller trees will be better able to adapt to the environmental stresses. Those trees which are successful will, within a few years, out-pace the growth of trees planted at a larger size. The lower cost of each tree means we can afford to plant significantly more trees to offset the anticipated loss. Planting significant numbers of trees in'natural areas' is very important. The 'natural areas' which require tree plantings cover a lot of acreage. Trees in these areas are naturally spaced close together until the passing of time completes the thinning process. These trees are in competition with a lot of the elements and forces present in these areas. Giving them the advantage of numbers is our best hope for assuring a successful outcome. Trees planted in'developed' park area need to be larger in size. They will be placed in areas covered by irrigation or where installation of irrigation can be reasonably accomplished. This will eliminate the problem of stress. The larger sizes are necessary to allow these trees to withstand 'interactions' with park users. Smaller trees are too easily damaged and have proved to be unsuccessful when installed in such areas. Trees of a larger size are also needed to provide the immediate visual impact in such highly visible areas. Our study identified only a limited number of locations in'developed' park where tree plantings are advisable. This will allow these plantings to be installed without overburdening the funds available for this work. The report identifies two categories of recommendations. The first are 'General Recommendations' which are policies or actions «fiich apply throughout the City. These'General Recommendations' are presented together immediately after this introduction. Following the 'General Recommendations', the second category, 'Site Specific' recommendations are presented. This section provides a narrative for each of the sites visited during the course of the study. The narrative gives a brief description of each site. Sites where plantings are recommended, the narrative includes a description of the general area(s) for tree plantings and the specific quantity, type, and size of trees to be planted. We have recommended "no tree planting" for a member of the sites we visited. Some sites have adequate tree cover and need no additional trees planted. The future use of other sites remains undetermined. Until the future use and development of these sites is determined we are unable to recommend appropriate tree plantings. The present use of some sites (e.g. sports fields) eliminates the need to plant trees in those parks. The narrative for these sites simply indicates "no tree plantings are recommended...". Maps are provided for each of the sites where we are recommending tree plantings. The maps are schematic in nature. We have indicated general areas where tree planting of various types are to be placed. Determining the actual location where trees are planted will be determined by marking locations in the field just prior to the installation of the trees. This approach minimizes costs related to mapping and allows planting locations to account for specific site conditions. Developing more detailed mapping would have required more detailed and costly site surveys and in the end field staking to determine locations would still be required. The use of schematic mapping and close field support to establish actual planting locations provides the best approach for implementing this program and keeps administrative and planning costs to a minimum. Implementation of these planting recommendations will be accomplished in several phases and it can take several forms. Volunteer plantings can be organized. Trees can be provided to community groups for tree plantings they have identified. Work can be contracted out to professional 2 9713rept.fnl landscaping companies. Work crews from County Corrections, supervised closely by City staff, can be ubcd. There are also a couple of options for securing the needed plant materials. The City can contract directly with nurseries or plant brokers for obtaining and/or growing trees. If the City contracts with a Landscape Contractor to install the trees the contract can include the requirement that the Contractor also provide the trees. All of these are viable options and each is likely to be used to implement these recommendations. The actual method(s) selected to implement the recommendations at any particular site will need to be determined by City staff and Council. 3 9713rept.fnl 1 i H v ri v M Yl/ m P GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Tree care and tree related maintenance has always been a part of the job of City maintenance personnel. However, as the City of Tigard grows the character, scale, and scope of tree related maintenance work changes significantly. The care of trees in parks and in urban natural areas has become an area of special study and expertise. Tigard's growing collection of pubic woodlands and forests place the City more and more in the role of forest caretaker. The increasing emphasis on natural forests, wetlands, and riparian areas requires City staff to protect and enhance natural areas which once would have been 'cleaned-up'. As the City grows more and more pressure is put on public lands. As public tastes and demands change, new types of landscapes require attention by the City. These additional pressures and new types of situations both increase and broaden the requirements for staff skills, time, tools, and equipment. Parks and public works maintenance staff often lack the experience and special training in arborculture needed to be able to provide efficient, safe, and comprehensive tree care and forest management. If the trees in the developed parks and 'natural' areas are to be healthy and vigorous, if these areas are to be maintained as safe places for the public to use; and if living adjacent to such areas is to remain save and desirable the City needs to be certain that staff has adequate personnel, proper expertise, and the right tools to perform the tasks required. Our recommendations in this area are as follows: a. Care and maintenance of the City's trees and woodlands needs to be actively pursued. While taking care of' 'danger trees' and other emergency situations is critical, a specific program of proactive care and management of the City's trees need to be developed b. Staff expertise and capabilities in the area of urban aborculture and forestry need to be enhanced. This is likely to require additional staff with suitable expertise, training of existing staff, and acquisition of additional equipment. 2. Trees in developed parks and natural areas often die or become damaged such that they must be removed. This is sometimes part of a natural thinning process which occurs in woodlands. The removal of trees can leave undesirable gaps. Our recommendations are as follows: a. In developed parks and natural woodlands: When a tree is removed careful thought should be given to the installation of replacement tree(s). A record of trees removed should be kept and a specific recommendation for replacement, if needed, should be part of that record. Replanting should occur as part of the removal process whenever possible. Where immediate replacement is not possible, a firm plan for fitture replacement planting shouid be developed. b. In natural woodlands: (1) Unless a dead tree presents a hazard it should be left standing. Dead trees provide unique and valuable habitat for a wide range of wildlife. (2) Trees which mast be felled or which have fallen over on their own accord should be 4 9713rept.fnl left in place wherever possible. If the tree must be cut into lengths (e.g., to remove blockage of a trail) the rood should be placed in an area where it will not be a hazard. If branches must be removed and chipped to eliminate fire hazards, the chips should be spread over the woodland area. The decaying wood will provide habitat for important flora and fauna, will retain the biomass within the woodland environment, and will reduce soil erosion. (3) When trees are removed front woodlands and replanting is deemed suitable special consideration should be given to the type of tree(s) to replant. Many of the City's woodlands are comprised of relatively short-lived deciduous tree species. Replanting with longer lived 'climax'species (e.g. Hemlock and Cedar), that can tolerate the shaded woodland conditions, should be considered where appropriate. 3. Native beaver and the non-native Nutria can have a significantly deleterious effect on the woodlands surrounding wetlands and stream corridors. As development further reduces the habitat available to these animals their impact will become more intense. Our recommendations are as follows: a. Beaver population should be monitored in all wetland and riparian areas. When damage to woodlands becomes evident a trapping and relocation program should be implemented. However, the beaver is a natural part of this environment and while limited management is unfortunately needed it should only be done reluctantly; when damage is found to be wide spread, serious, and adversely impacting wide areas of woodland; and when preventative and remedial measures are ineffective. b. Nutria are a non-native species, introduced when f it harvesting schemes proved to be unprofitable. They offer no positive contribution to the environment, they damage natural habitats, and they displace native species. These animals should be actively eradicated from all the City's parks and green spaces. 4. Water quality and water detention facilities are becoming a growing element in our communities. They are often placed in highly visible locations. These facilities perform important utilitarian functions. Proper functioning and periodic maintenance of these facilities places important demands on the design and character of these facilities and their surroundings. However, many of the region's Engineering and Landscape design professionals are designing facilities which are aesthetically pleasing while serving all of their basic functions. Many of the visual enhancements can also serve to minimize maintenance work while enhancing and expanding the utilitarian functions of these facilities and their surroundings. Tree plantings are the type of 'improvement' which can enhance both the aesthetics and functioning of such features. Therefore we recommend: The planting of significant number trees and other tivood vegetation be a requirement at all water quality and water detention facilities. These plantings shall be required to enhance the storm flow mitigation and water qualityfimctions; minimize long term site maintenance; broaden the function of'the sites (e.g., provide habitat, provide visual screening); and enhance the aesthetic character of these facilities. 5 9713rept.fnl broaden the function of the sites (e.g., provide habitat, provide visual screening); and enhance the aesthetic character of these facilities. 5. Control of Invasive Plant Species: There are a number invasive plant species in our area which interferes with the establishment and continued vigor of trees and native shrubs. Introduced species such as English Ivy, Himalaya blackberry, and Reed Canary grass are of particular concern in the Tigard area. These plants are so wide spread that any general program for their elimination would not be financially feasible. Therefore we recommend: Where new trees are planted an active program for eradication of these particular species should be conducted. This program would need to begin prior to planting of the trees and follow-up eradication work would needed to be conducted for several growing seasons afterwards. Where eradication of these and other aggressive plant species f-om a wide area is not possible actions should concentrate on eliminating these plant in the area immediately around newly planted trees. 6. Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan (FCWMP) Support: The Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) of Washington County worked with a committee representing state, county and local jurisdictions (including Tigard), businesses, and community group representatives to develop comprehensive recommendations for enhancing the water quality and storm water handling functions of Fanno Creek. A significant portion of this stream flows through Tigard and a number of the sites considered by this (Tigard 2000 Trees) report lie along the banks of this stream. The recommendations of the FCWMP are much broader than those encompassed in this plan. However, the planting of trees is specifically identified in the FCWMP as an important component of the schemes for enhancing the quality and functions of Fanno Creek and it's tributaries. Our recommendations in relation to this report are as follows: a. The City of Tigard should support the efforts ofpublic and private groups in the realization enhancement recommendations relating to the planting of trees at the sites identified in the FCWMP in the City of Tigard b. Special attention should be given to providing assistance to community volunteer supported groups such as the "Fans ofFanno Creek". The "Fans" organize an annual tree planting day on the first weekend of March. They rely on the financial support from grants and government agencies to secure the native trees which their volunteers plant along the stream corridors. Presently, and in the foreseeable future, the "Fans" are concentrating their efforts within the City of Tigard in East Englewood Park and the adjacent and downstream riparian areas. A representative of the "Fans" expects that their group will be seeking $3,500 - $5, 000 per year to purchase trees to support their efforts. It is the recommendation of this report that the City of Tigard utilize the finds from the tree removal permits to support these and other organized volunteer efforts. (See Appendix D for excerpts from USA's Fanno Creek Watershed Me.;zagement Plan.) 6 9713rept.fnl t a Sife SpecificRecoirnmendations e t PARK AND PUBLIC GREENWA Y SITE SPECIFIC TREE PLANTING RECO LUENDATIONS The City Wide Map (figure 1) following this page shows the location for all of the sites covered by this report. The pages following the City Wide Map describe our recommendations for tree plantings at each park and public greenway site visited during the course of this report. Where plantings are recommended the report for that site contains: 1. a description of the site. 2. a description of the general purposes for planting trees. 3. the areas for different tree plantings. 4. specific types, sizes, and quantities of trees recommended to be planted in each area. Sites where plantings are recommended a Schematic Map of the site is provided. This map shows the general area where tree plantings are proposed. The scale and general nature of these maps does not allow for depiction of specific tree planting locations. The locations where individual trees will be planted will be marked in the field as the initial step in the planting program for each site's areas. There are a number of sites where we have not recommended planting additional trees. The narrative for these sites describes the site's character and the reasons why no additional tree plantings are recommended. No maps are provided for sites where tree plantings are not recommended at this time. 1 7 9713rept.fnl Aj -..w.r.~-...m.r.. r...•~:.r..~wwL.a~a~....ti.:.~.,yda..-. _ ....a.y'Y..aw... `~~.3~....._._...: _,..._~....-~.•-.,v Fun~..~....-_.~ c..v__..Ya._~.~.,:~.4~..:ti.tB4a5-.........~. a._~-da:....~- .,p':w..6. ...,...~_.--+..s~.._.v~--,:~W....+:+~..ll-..,.,___..~...,. City or Tigard 114TU STORM DRAIN OUTFALL 11 Geographic Information System ENU GLEWOOD ; PARK - y \ - I <;5 WEIR I RD F- ) I •ti-i', Z I ' i JACK PARK, JACK CREEK, SUMMERCREEK & FOWLER GREENWAYS. GREENBURG GREENWAYS 2000 TREES PROJECT r ~ ~ ; 1\ BERRY EE ~ I I) ~ a L! J y^ 1. i f a te. - PIGARD--S-T.. SGRE"NW'tA-Y S " CITY WIDE MAP WINTERLAKE GREENWAY DAKOTA st n" WOODWAR D PARK sw RfAFfLE k ~ / rt.! I i ~ I I 7 SUMMERLAKE PARK OF GRANT GREEN WAY' { pw~ ~qo ~TI ~ { t RCI L PARK CASTLEHIL L GREENWAY COMME s W !s Yd AL U e T \FANNO CREEK PARK pr FIHLLSHHIRE WOODS GREENWAYS w y\ \ r- ,s J a F . 6ul ' ) I • ~r Moun / i o ,-s BENCHVIEW GREENWAY - m NOTE: This map is of a generalized s. 1 ; o sr ` sw McDONALp _ nature and should not be t E g ° I COLONY CREEK GREENWAYS e used for detailed measurments. N f j I BONITA RD. GREEN WAY BULL MU N IN i RD r RD 1 ' •C; / Z I 7~ % Percival Associates GENESIS-PATHFINDER AND TERRACE TRAILS GREENWAYS Landscape Architecture SCEIECKLA GREENWAY e / GENTLEWOODS GREEN 1 INCH = 2400 FEET WAYS IN ? \ f y lp W E fif S t. Sw RNAM RD _ DURHAM SN < I - s ..j "YD RD a PICK'S LANDING & WILLOWBROOK FARM GREENWAYS RD , Zw~/ CH w DOVER &PICK'S LANDING GREENWAY COOK PARK y W D, ° ~ b y~5j~ 11\24\97 tlg2tsystgistprojectsishadtreeishadtree.apr(city.prt) Figure 1 BENCHVIEW GREENWAY (see Figure 2) Site Description: This site is located in the hills of western Tigard. The largest portion of the site is located to the west of 132nd just south of Bench View Terrace. This area is covered by a mixed species second growth Douglas Fir woodland. The smaller parcel to the east of 132nd has been cleared or effected by construction and has only a few small volunteer Alder trees growing on it. Planting Recommendations: The western parcel is well wooded and requires no additional tree planting. The eastern parcel would benefit from a reforestation planting to cover the bare areas. We recommend planting Douglas Fir, Hawthorne, and Crabapple in this area. (Quantity) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (75) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii - 12"-18" tall (1 gallon); (35) Black Hawthorne / Crataegus douglasii and (35) Western Crabapple / Malus usca - 2 gallon 8 9713rept.fnl X„ _a._cu ...•...-.fm' .-i r....,~. t».........,,.~....~~~~....~_~ c,z,..''ws~.;..ai,~.mb.c.xw........,~,c,~..~.......e~.._~..r.-... ~'i:..L~-~ - k BENCHVIEW GREENWAY s REFORESTATION AREA Tigard 2000 ~(P\,, 1 Trees Project Existing ~t da° ) Woodland PARK OR I C~~ GREENWAY BOUNDARY ° Schematic Tree a~ S)N BENCHVI 1 7"1 Planting Plan • v Y L e° , t ~ e y, . ~ • • ° \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ `Lim' l e v \ i I NOTE: e a , this map is of ageneralized ' nature and should not be used for detailed measurments. Existing Woodland ; ✓ ® 1 IM \ 1 Percival Associates s Landscape Architecture A I 7f November 21,1997 61 1 inch =125 feet . v ( ' N ♦ • I ° w E • E SHE S P i i - 0 wua f M1 10\9197 1:VisVmjoctalahadtreetshadtrac.apr(woodward.prt) LU CITY OF TIGARD $ 8713 Tigard 2000 Traas Figure 2 B i a BONITA ROAD GREENWAY (no map provided) Site Descri tion: This site consists of a fairly flat open space of undeveloped property on the north and south sides of Bonita Road on the eastern edge of the City. The site contains some stands of sizeable deciduous trees (bak and Ash), but it looks like it was cleared for development and utility installation in the not to distant past. The flat topography, nature of the site's vegetation, and the dimensions of the site would seem to present this site the potential for development as an organized recreation site. At present we could not identify the City's long term plans for this site. Until the future of the site is determined it would be premature to identify or implement plantings of trees on this site. Planting Recommendations: No tree plantings are recommended for this site. 9 9713rept.fnl CASTLEHILL GREENWAY (see Figure 3) Site Description: The Castlehill Greenway is comprised of three water quality/detention ponds near the intersection of SW 135th and Walnut Street in western Tigard. Pond #1, the most westerly, is the only one of the ponds which has standing water for most or all of the year. The other two only hold water during storms. Except for a few hydrophytic plants (cattails) around the edge of pond #1 the only desirable vegetation around these ponds is rough seeded grass. Blackberries are already becoming established around the edges of pond #2 This invasive vegetation will likely become well established around all of the ponds. The ponds are immediately adjacent to the single family and multi-family residential developments. At present the ponds are not a positive aesthetic element in the neighborhood. Judicious tree planting can help to correct this condition. Planting Recommendations: The utilitarian functions of these sites requires that equipment access be provided into and around these ponds. When locations for planting trees are staked, special care and coordination will be required to be sure that access ways are not blocked and that there is no interference with maintenance and cleaning tasks. Additionally, the basic water holding and cleaning functions of these ponds requires that certain areas be kept clear of vegetation in order to maintain the capacity of the sites. Specific planting locations will need to be kept out of such areas. However, in keeping with the General Recommendations we recommend that trees be planted around these facilities to provide a more positive image and a more environmentally enhancing character to these ponds. Pond #1: We recommend planting Douglas Fir and Western Red Cedars on the northern edge of the pond. This will provide a visual 'frame' for the ponds and some visual screening between Walnut Street and the homes which surround this pond. Most of the area along the street should be left open to allow clear view from the roadway into the pond. Alders and Willow should be planted along the southern and western sides of the pond. These trees will shade the water in the pond and provide a more aesthetically pleasing pond perimeter. It should also be noted that tree planted in dense groves will inhibit the growth of the blackberry and will assist in minimizing the maintenance work related to these berries. (Quantity) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (50 Douglas Fir / P.suedotsuga menziesii and (25) Western Red Cedar / Thuja plicata - 12"- 18" height (1 gallon) (75) Red Alder / Alnus rubra - 6 ft. height and (50) Scouler's Willow / Salix scouleriana - 1 gallon Pond #2: We recommend planting Black Hawthorne and Ponderosa Pines along the northern edge of the pond. This will provide a screen between the pond and the adjacent apartment complex to the north. (Quantity) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size 10 9713rept.fnl (40) Ponderosa Pine / Pinus ponderosa - 24"-36" height (30) Black Hawthorne / Crataegus douglash - 1 gallon Pond #3: We recommend planting Black Hawthorne and Ponderosa Pine along the eastern edge of this pond. (Quanti ) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (3Q) Ponderosa Pine / Pinus ponderosa - 24 "-36" height (20) Black Hawthorne / Crataegus douglasii - 1 gallon 11 9713rept.fnl .1..,...ii a..~,...-_..~..~.~..u...~. --=•u _~...u. c._.~fiL-~... ~_tw_.-L...__~ u7,•~ c_. .m..._ _.,__-.s-.~s.~,._sm'.i~~.....~......... .r.. ._~>_.,n~..~_ .,.-v.+-.~..'. j:.,.~,..,....,~.--~L,:.--~" T?I 31 LA . i CASTLEHiLL E CREENWAY 1 z Tigard 2000 . 00. Trees Project PINE AND HAWTHORNE PLANTING PARK OR GREENWAY BOUNDARY POND #2 con DRY POND Schematic Tree POND #9 DOUGLAS FIR AND CEDAR PLANTING Planting Plan WET POND ~7~ SW WALl~ V T ST November 20, 1997 POND #3 'i WILLOW PLANTING RY POND NOTE: this nature aand l should not be used for detailed measurments. ALDER PLAN IN Percival Associates Landscape Architecture PINE AND HAWTHORNE PLANTING 1 inch o 100 feet S I ~y C CITY OF TIAD i 11/18197 1: aVrojectals reaisnadree' aprlcadNll.prt) Figure 3 i 9713 Tigard 2000 Trees ;UMN COLONY CREEK GREENWAYS (see Figure 4) Site Description: This greenway is comprised of a number of adjacent and separate greenway parcels on the banks of Fanno Creek in the eastern section of the City. An asphalt trail runs through the northerly group of these greenway parcels and serves as a connection along the creek and between neighborhood streets and cul-de-sacs. The greenway parcels are fairly well vegetated. Unfortunately, much of the vegetation between the trail and adjacent creek is comprised of blackberry thickets. Little shade is provided for the creek and little plant diversity is present in these areas. At the northern end of the green ways there are some areas between the stream meanders which do not have adequate tree cover. Blackberries are no as much of a problem in these areas but the lack of tree cover does mean the creek is not ;properly shaded and habitat diversity is not what it could be. Planting Recommendations: Blackberry thickets need to be cut down to ground level in areas where planting are indicated. Care must be taken not to disturb site soil while accomplishing this task. This is most important in the "South Planting Area" where creek side slopes fall steeply away from the trail. Plantings in the "South Planting Area" will comprise of Alder trees planted on the upper banks adjacent to the slopes and willow cuttings in the exposed and steep lower portions of the stream bank. (Quantity) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (120) Red Alder /Alnus rubra - 1 gallon: Plant on upper slopes of bank. (500) Columbia Willow / Salix uviatilis - 10"-12" long cuttings: All cuttings shall be fresh and viable with at least 4 viable growth buds. Plant in lower banks of steam. Plantings shall be concentrated on the scour side of bends in the stream which are near the path. The "North Planting Areas" extend from the path edge and out onto points of land between the undulations of the stream course. These areas are more frequently inundated and planting Oregon Ash will be more appropriate in these areas. (Quantity) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (100) Oregon Ash / Fraxinus latifolia - 3 to 4 foot height 12 9713rept.fnl .I I Schematic Tree Colony Creek/Estates Drive/ Tigard 2000 E Finley Park/Bonita Rd Greenways Trees Project Planting Plan PACK OR November 20, 1997 Percival Associates T^ NOTE: map is of ageneralized Landscape Architecture ~li~ OF ~ICA►Ria GREENWAY E this v BOUNDARY nature and should not be used for detailed measurments. 1 iriCil ° feed `j s 10\997 C,gistprojeclslshadtreetshadtree.apr(colony.prt) f•L+ - _ - 9713 Tigard 2000 Trees .j A ° v i z 4 Z s f vEA r ° l 0 VS i• 47 .o. 2.. $ t ~ i ! i~f lI I;~s ~ i I j II ! I i I i I + I , DRIVE I l I i :a i C _ '1 l I !!~1 lcp- ELI 1 I V 4.- KRO i J! I l M EM M MM EM ME 3 COMMERCIAL PARK (no map provided) Site Description: This is a small green space just to the west of Highway 99 west of old downtown Tigard. The site is covered by lawn with a generous canopy of mature deciduous trees. This site afford no opportunity to plant additional trees. Planting Recommendations: No tree plantings are recommended for this site. tY7 r ~ 3 `tat's aM1 ' ~~.'Z2P'. S~ J f ~y SCt1 .t~i; akET t, +Ly! ySi t 13 9913rept,, COOK PARK (see Figure S) Site Description: Cook Park is located on the banks of the Tualatin river on the southern edge of Tigard. The park lies within the river's flood plain. Some portions of the park are flooded annually and the entire site is occasionally covered by flood waters. Cook Park is the City's largest park and the most actively used. Events like the annual hot-air balloon races, which are held at Cook Park, make this a regionally significant park site. The park is comprised of five distinctive areas. The first are the sports fields and parking lot on the western edge of the park. The second is the newly acquired rough grass and wetland area in the northeast corner of the site. The area of rough grass in this section is planned to be developed for more active recreational use. The third area is grassed wooded area used for picnicking in the central portion of the park. The fourth are the natural woodland areas along the banks of the Tualatin River and in the center and eastern edges of the park. The fifth is the developed boat launch and grass picnic area along the river at the southern edge of the park. Planting Recommendations: There are three separate areas within the park where tree plantings can contribute to the character and environmental quality of the site. The soccer fields, in the northwestern corner of the park, lack trees along most of the perimeter. The size of this multiple field complex could be made more pleasing by the presence of large trees around its perimeter. We are recommending the planting of large scale canopy trees (Red Oaks) on the western and southern edges of the fields. In addition to providing a suitable scale 'frame' for the field area, these trees will provide shade for spectators and players. We are recommending that evergreen trees (Douglas Fir and Western Red Cedars) be planted in the wetland buffer area at the northern edge of the site. These trees will provide additional buffering for the residents to the north, shade the wetland ponds, buffer the natural environments from the actively used fields, and provide a suitable visual frame on this side of the fields. The presence of low overhead power lines prevents planting of trees on the eastern boundary of the fields. If these lines are ever placed under ground, planting of Red Oaks along this side of the field would be highly recommended. (Quantity) Common NamelBotanical Name - Planting Size (26) Red Oak / Quercus rubra - 3" caliper: Install at 40 feet on center on the west and south sides of the soccer fields. These should be planted within an irrigated area. (70) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii and (70) Western Red Cedar / Thuja plicata - 4-6 ft. height: These should be planted north of the mown grass in the rough grass area south of the wetland ponds. The trees will be planted in clusters in an informal arrangement. Temporaty irrigation should be routed from the irrigation mainline in the soccer field to provide watering for these trees for the first two to four years after they are installed. 14 9713rept.fnl The newly developed wetlands in the northeastern corner present one of the most significant opportunities for tree plantings. Planting recommendations for this wetlands are separated into five planting areas. Each planting area will have a specific character and serve functions suitable for that area. The north shore of the ponds is mostly covered by blackberry thickets. These need to be eliminated and the area planted with Douglas Fir. The Fir will screen the park from the new residential developments to the north, shade out future berry growth, provide habitat and winter cover for wildlife. (QuantitK) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (300) Douglas Fir/ Psuedotsuga menziesii - 12"-] 8 "tall (1 gallon): Plant in clusters such that when mature they will provide a dense screen all across the northern edge of the wetland. Along the eastern boundary of the wetlands we recommend planting Douglas Fir, Western Red Cedar and Willows. The evergreen trees would be planted in the riparian zone away from the waters edge. The willow would be planted at the water's edge. These plantings will shade the pond water to keep temperatures down, screen future development to the east, and provide additional habitat. (,Quanti W Common NamelBotanical Name - Planting Size (75) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii and 05) Western Red Cedar / Thuia plicata - 12"-18" tall (I gallon): Plant in clusters of three to five trees of the same species. (50) Scouler's Willow / Salir scouleriana (30) Northwest Willow / Salix sessilifolia, and (30) Columbia River Willow /Salix fluviatilis - I gallon: Plant in groups of like species at or near the water's edge. Along the south shore of the ponds several types of willows and several clusters of Poplar trees will be planted. These trees will provide shading for the water, forage and habitat for the wildlife. (Quantittj Common NameiBotanical Name - Planting Size (15) Balsam Poplar / Populus trichocarpa - 6 ft. height: Plant near water's edge. (100) Pacific Willow / Salir lucida ssp lasiandra (100) Scouler's Willow / Salix scouleriana - I gallon: Plant at or near waters edge. (Note: There have been suggestions that recycled water from the nearby treatment plant could be made available for irrigation of the wetland area plantings. It is our understanding that a pipeline carrying this rater already runs through or near to this site. We would strongly recommend installation of a temporary irrigation system and utilization of this water to provide irrigation for these planting for a three to five year long establishment period. During this time an active program to eliminate or reduce the g, owth of blackberry thickets should be carried out.) Along the edge of the wetland area adjacent to the field will be planted with Hawthorns, Crabapple, Ponderosa Pine, and Douglas Fir. These plantings will create a protective hedge row along the boundary between the wetland buffer and field area which is planned for future 15 9713rept.fnl MMI development. (Quantify) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (200) Black Hawthorne /Crataeglis doug asii and (15Q) Pacific rab p-gle / Malus fusca - 1 gallon: Plant in groups within a strip 15-20 feet wide in the 'wetland' area along the boundary with the rough grass field area. (100) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga n:enziesii and (50) Ponderosa Pine / Pinus ponderosa - 12"-18"height (1 gallon). The grass gicnic and boat launching area along the river at the southern edge of the park presents two opportunities for tree plantings. Trees planted in the mown grass area when this area was first developed did not survive. There is little opportunity for park users to find shade in this area. We recommend planting several groves of native Alder trees to provide shade in this area. (Quattft Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (15) Red Alder/ Alnus rubra - 3"caliper: Plant in three groups offour to six trees each. The open river bank areas adjacent to the fishing dock and boat launch areas are bare of any trees. Some of that area is intended as a small boat launching and landing. These areas must be kept clear of trees. Other areas would benefit from the planting of trees which can tolerate the annual flooding of these areas. Willows and Oregon Ash are the type of trees suitable for planting in this area. (Quanti ) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (30) Columbia River Willow /Salix j`luviatilis - 1 gallon; and (20) Oregon Ash/Fraxinus lati blia - 6ft. height: Planted near the lowllow river edge. 16 9713rept.fnl ; , , `~r DOVER PICKS GREENWAY - L- - = t I L / r -__LJ , _4- / r1` -(See Fjgu e _ z T + SW ~ _ / LAJON i It NORTH PLANTING AREA -_I NORTH FIELD UNDARY (Arse 1) (Area 5)1 / TUALATIN ' ~ - r PARK OR GREENWAY ~R ` - • • Steam • , r" BOUNDARY C SoccerField - ' . • r ; Schematic Tree I EASTERN Planting Plan . it FWL. WiTLAND.BbU j'DARY BOUNDARY SOUTH FIELD BOUND, Y (Area 4) :t (Area 2) (Area 6) Rough Grass Area, ! J Tigard X000 01 ' ; Trees Project Parking Lot November 7, 1997 - Pla round POND SOUTH SHORE (Area 3) Wooded Picnic Area Parking Lot. Parkin Lot 1 <allfields NOTE: this map is of 4generahzed Restroom Picnic helter- nature and should not be SHADE TREE PLANTING used for detailed measurments, Existing Woodlan (Area 7) <I I Percival Associates Parking Lot RIVER EDGE PLANTING Landscape Architecture i (Area 8) Boat Launch t Fishing Dock - 9 INCH = 300 FEET i Grass Picnic Area i Boating N E S'' + Ri ~i ly parian Woodland Area s 9t2914 tig21srs1gislprojectsisr, r cookp5riiPrt) WrY OF GARO • 9713 Tigard 2009 Trees Figure 5 a t; T ~ e DOVER LANDING - PICK'S LANDING-WILLOWBROOK FARM GREENWAYS (see Figures 6 and 7) Site Description: This group of sites lie west of Cook Park. A greenway trail runs from Cook park and through the river side sites in this group. Three sites at the western end of this group are located away from the river. They are essentially landlocked woodland sites. The greenway parcels along the river can be divided into three zones. Starting in the east, bordering Cook Park, a dense mixed species forest covers the first section of this area. Moving to the west one arrives at an open mown grass area. The riverside (southern) edge of this site is covered by a riparian Douglas Fir-Alder woodland of varying width. The trees bordering this side of the lawn provide a very pleasing framework for the open grass area. There are no organized recreation facilities and only a few trees in this grassed area. The backyards of adjacent home border the northern edge of this area. The open grass fields provide an area for informal play. West of lawn area the trail leads into a mixed riparian forest environment. Some of this area is covered by healthy and mature woodland trees and shrubs. However, some portions of this area have only sparse tree cover, the trees species are short lived varieties, and undesirable plant species have become established. Additionally, in a small portion of this area recent construction activities have left some areas without tree cover. Planting Recommendations: The area at the eastern end of this group of sites is well wooded and we recommend no additional tree plantings there. The open grass area to the west of this woodland might benefit from additional tree plantings. However, we recommend no additional tree planting in this area at this time. Tree plantings, if appropriate, should be delayed until more discernable plans are made for the use of this area. The sites at the western end of this grouping, which lie away from the river, appear to be adequately wooded. We recommend no additional tree planting in these sites. The riparian woodlands west of the open grass area offer significant opportunities for tree planting. It is our recommendation that we plant trees species such as Western Red Cedar, Western Hemlock, and Douglas Fir in the open and thinly wooded sections of this area. As these trees grow we will see a reduction of the blackberry thickets and an increase in th.- mixed riparian forest. There are already significant portions of this type of environment in this greenway. The new tree plantings will help to expand this pleasant and rich riverside environment. (Quantity) Common Name/Botanical Nante - Planting Size (200) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii. (200) Western Red Cedar / ThttL nl icata. and (200) Western Hemlock / T.suga heterophvlla - 12"-18" height (I gallon): Clear blackberries away from planting locations prior to installing trees. Plant in open areas and areas where existing tree cover is thin or in poor condition. 17 9713rept.inl %J - ~ \ ~ / ~ .r.r. .r.r.F..+..r..+..~...n..m...... .............~_..~._a S•YI DOVER & PIC LANDING GREENWAY / v \ Schematic Tree Planting Plan iVER~ Tigard 3000 Trees Project -T~ L PICK'S LANDING#2 / December 9, 1997 i WAY ° ` a✓ - PICK'S LANDING #1 COOKIPARK COPPER CREEK #2 COOWPARK COPPER CREEK #1 A ° , 8pen Grass Area ~a~ ' , J•°' PARK OR GREENWAY Mixed Riparian Forest - BOUNDARY Drainage Course Trail j ` Dense Mixed Species Forest t PICK'S LANDING & WILLOWBROOK FARM GREENWAYS ~...a. This map is of a NOTE: (See Figure 7)_nature and should generalized not rbe T~ - - , used for detailed maasurments, o ~ '1 ;g -JP~F I COOK PARK a (See Figure 5) 1 INCH = 200 FEET ,e N a~a w E I - s j L} I : 14 CITY OF TIGARD - 12+09197Ug2\sys\gisAprojectsAshadtreeAshadtree.opr(tualatn2.prt) r `i 9715 Tigard 2000 Trees I"1gUt8 v Ci -4 I 77 5 I 1 l 3 f - _ _ f, Aw~.'awzL~..o - ry.~,.1......c,J_.~.~.•....uYaceu.A*~`_AaJ_. 1.A....,.._c.,~. ..~.1_....-.~..v.-w..c+._w...~.._..-.-~a~+yWW.c:~1".L.w.LJ......~...-._,~..~... •W..tw-_1:..u.u.=J.:..r.. ......-,.r._. ~+.v: _~+-JiL.'...1.r dR .iD..l n,~._w-aa3......].uu-..f^-~.._--+r»lt-..~.,..-.,__4,. _ .,_v.....Y~_... v_•......... c Eu • I 'PICK'S LANDING & RURHAMROAD LOT i _ WILLOUV®ROc~K FARM ~ f GREENWAY•S REBECCA PARK @~® PARK OR GREENWAY BERKLEY ESTATES LOT__ J' BOUNDARY 8 9 - - X\_ J Schematic Tree _ - LN e D - Planting Plan Y o SW TITAN `TITAN LN < - SMART 'Tigard 2000 Trees Project December 9, 1997 00 K ST N1' ~T NOTE: YVIU0WBR00K FARM LOT I DOVER PICKS LANDING GREENWAY this map is of agenerahzed l --(See ~19Ure nature and should not be used for detailed measurments.=9 DOUGLAS FIR, CEDAR AND HEMLOCK PLAN . I 6 DOVER COURT 8118TH AVE LOT ;o ; DOVE-RCT 1 INCH = 200' N i eDOVER LANDING LOT - ' WAY RNERVIEW LOT w e ~ TUALATIN DRIVE LOT ° e Mbced Riparian Forest ad s~ DOVER LANDING LOT r - .d' DOUGLAS FIR, CEDAR AND HEMLOCK PLANTING O1I OF t6GARD 11t12L47 tig2lsystigislprotectsthadtreelshadtree.epr(dover.prt) Figure 7 r , 9713 Tpard20DTrees ENGLEWOOD PARK (see Figure 8) Site Description: Englewood Park is comprised of two separate parcels in the northwestern part of the City. The easterly portion of the park is referred to as East Englewood Park. A greenway trail and Fanno Creek extend the length of this parcel. Additional City greenway property extends along Fanno Creek south out of this parcel. There are scattered groupings of trees and riparian shrubs in this area but the area is comprised mostly of open grasslands. This section of the park and the greenway extending to the south are areas where the "Friends of Fanno Creek" are developing and implementing planting plans. The westerly portion of the park is referred to as Upper Englewood Park. The portion of the park south of Springwood Drive contains areas of mature riparian forest. The portion of the park north of Springwood Drive is mostly open grassland. Some of the area is mowed, but along the creek edge the grasses are left to naturalize and grow long. Early on in the course of this study a volunteers planted over 200 small trees in this portion of the site. This fulfilled the planting needs for a good portion of the area, but some key locations are still in need of additional tree plantings. Planting Recommendations: At this time an overall 'master' planting scheme for East Englewood Park has not been developed by the Friends of Fanno Creek. They nave done considerable preparatory work on the site and have installed quite a number of native trees and shrubs. It is our recommendation that, as their plans are developed, the City provide the trees needed for their planting efforts,. We recommend installation of trees in five areas of Upper Englewood Park. At the north end of the site, adjacent to Scholls Ferry Road we recommend planting Douglas Fir in the'Buffer Planting Area'. These trees will screen the park from the busy roadway. (Quantity) Common Name/Botanica;` Name - Planting Size (75) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga menzi?sii - 12"-18" height (1 gallon) Along the north and south sides of the stream we ~lre recommending planting of Ash and Alder trees to provide tree coverage along the course of the stream. (Quantity) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (35) Oregon Ash / Fraxinus latifolia and (35) Red Alder / Alnus rubra - 1 gallon South of the creek and trail we are recommending planting of several groves of larger sized Alder trees in the mown grass area. (Quantity) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (18) Red Alder /Alnus rubra - 2" caliper 18 9713rapt.£nl rryy _ t4 i ~~v~, ~ry Just north of Springwood Drive the creek widens to form a small bog area. We are recommending planting of Willow to form a thicket in this area. (Quantify) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (20) Scouler's Willou, / Salix scouleriana - 2 gallon Finally, along both sides of Springwood Drive we are recommending planting of large size Alder trees as street trees. (Quanti ) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size 00) Red Alder /Alnus ruhra - 2 caliper 19 9713rept.fnl yy { - L,.,,.. - - 4 . 1 g.. .-,si=s`~~..•d-.-~.-':.>~i.:......__._...-_-~ .,.,,A.'.~ns , .tat..,:;k- ..s is ~a.. F L` 1'.,, ..rra,ar-.._..~rL ....tSi~r~:_i. ...~J.=.w-... ..a. y .._wurua•L+..._.. ..t.!- 'L..•:.w-..~.l.,~l w---_•.-_..u. l.. ._SL...1~.. W.~'.r.+. ,`at's L ._....arM.n..::'__.._a4duY~-@L'i'<. _ pp .r 0. i ENGLEWaOD vol~ . - PARK Culvert Tigard 2000 Trees Project ;N roes UPPER ENGLEWOOD PARK _ PARK OR GREENWAY BOUNDARY BUFFER PLANTING AR Schematic Tree Planting Plan r SC~OV~- NORTH STREAM SIDE PLAITING AREA EAST ENGLEI~O®D PARK \ Bridge , SO TH STREAM al E PLAN IN AR A This portion of the park will be revegetated as a part of the Fanno Creek Watershed / Plan. Presently, the Fans of Fanno Creek, 1%., a citizen volunteer organization is taking the -g ; SOUTH lead in developing and implementing ___i site specific planting plans for this area. ' ~C1 PLANTING AREA MARSH EDGE PLA,~BTi G A EA ~ The recommendation of this report is that \ 11• " ti the city of Tigard support these efforts by NOTE: } providing funds for plant materials needed this map is of ageneralized STR ET REE P NTi G AREA for these efforts nature and should not be , used for detailed measunents. ® Percival Associates \ Landscape Architecture November 12,1997 ulvert Tsaif °i:xftng Rough Grass Area t inch a 200 feet Existing Woodland ENGLEWOOD SOUTH GREENWAY • e a• W E a x8 , ON CITY OF TIGARD Figure 8 I 9713'fpard 2000 Trees 'ILL FANNO CREEK PARK (see Figure 9) Site Description: Famno Creek Park lies between Main Street and Hall Boulevard in central Tigard. Fanno Creek and a series of paved greenway trails run through the park. The park is bordered on the east end by a Senior Center on the south and the City Hall / Library complex on the north. The remainder of the park's southern edge is bordered by homes and apartments. The northern edge is bordered by offices and industrial uses. Except for a modest sized lawn area adjacent to City Hall. the park is comprised of a variety of natural riparian and wetland vegetation types. "nos Planting. Recommendations: Our recommendation is to install trees which will fill in a few selected treeless areas along the creek h,ljp and trees to screen the adjacent developed areas from the park. 1t the v,estern end of the stream a narrow strip of land runs between the trail and stream. This area is Co~cred mostly by blackberries. Our recommendation is to clear the berry thickets and plant Ash and J Willow trees within this area. (Ottantia) Common Nance/Botanical Name -Planting Size (hO) Oregon -1 sh / FraYinus latifolia and (60) Scouler's Willow / Salix scouleriana - I gallon t At t%%o of the bridge crossings there are open areas along the streams. We recommend planting Willo«s to till these areas in. (Quantity) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size f No) Srouler's Willow /.Salix scouleriana - 1 gallon ton, a siunificant portion of the park's southern boundary houses and apartment buildings abut the r,ir};lands. These buildings dominate views from within the park. This takes away from the 'natural' h,i aster of the park. We recommend planting clusters of Douglas Fir and Western Red Cedars this area to screen the buildings from the park interior and to provide evergreen cover for the (Quantitt-) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size 1200) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii and (200) Western Red Cedar / Thuiaia Plicata - 12 18 " height (1 gallon) _:astcrn end of the park there are very few trees along the northern edge of the creek. We nand planting Douglas Fir, Western Red Cedar, Alder, Ash, and Willows along this area to n itintious grove of trees along the stream. (Ouuntitr) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (I 5) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii and (15) Western Red Cedar / ThuL lip cata - 12 18" height (I gallon) ('J) Scoider's lVillotiv / 4alix scouleriana (50) Red Alder /Alnus rubra. and (30) r ' Fraxinu.s latifolia - 2 gallon ry.t~wi i h' 9713rept.fnl 20 u ~ t t ~ %,H~~jh°g6f4w t~ FRI At the eastern end of the site, north of the path removal of hazardous trees has left a sizeable opening in the woodland adjacent to the pond. We recommend planting Oregon Ash, Hawthorne, and Willows to fill in this opening. (Quantity) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (]S) Oregon Ash / Fraxinus lati olia. (11) Black Hawthorne / Cratae ug s douglasii, and (10) Scouler's Willow /Salix scouleriana - 2 gallon Along Hall Boulevard, in front of the adjacent City Hall and Library building, Sweet Gum trees are planted along the street. This planting stops short of the greenway frontage on the Boulevard. We recommend planting Sweet Gum in the mown grass strip along this frontage to continue the line of street trees. (Quantity,) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size j¢) Sweet Gum / Liguidambar stvraci ua - 3" caliper 21 9713rept.fnl -.~.y.A.:-.-~.~-.~=w..,.~..~.,...`.•... f h. ~,a.~ W-rt 1.u,» ~J.. ~'Y-.~~x +._.~...~.~.3 _~w~+..r~.~,_~~w..o.__....~-.k ,~...~.~..-11 ~ _..~id.a~.. ~..~-r.. .u--.. ..a+•.~...,~.~_ owc __r.~Y~~a~w._w~_.., ~_+o.•..»_ ~d4~•,..L.i.~.=i-isi~..~_~c!.~lw...r.-..o-~.:_~.u.uy-,a,ial~ 61 [ _f r F ~ i IL so FAN PARK OR \ i % BOUNDARY ~AGREENWAY'V Tigard 2000 j WEST STREAK Trees Project 'PLANTING AREA (Area 1) Schematic Tree ubllc Work Planting Plan f i BRIDGE PLANTING AREA \ (Area 2) 1 NOTE: ' \ \ / \ ougti Grass Area \ this map is of ageneralized v ~x\~~ ' ( nature and should not be used for detailedmeasurmenls. [ Percival Associates f ~'~Fp ~Bridge City Hall Landscape Architecture Bridge \ \v f a ! \ LAYING November 11, 1997 HALL LVD STREET E Pon vCi ~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~ y Cr ~ ' r d 1 INCH = 300 FEET PLA 1+1 SO TH PROPERTY LINE B F ER P TINS ~`sam EAST STR M AND POND (Area 3). -EE sting Woodland \ \ N ~°~r,~ 1 w E BRIDGE PLA~T011G AREA s I I~\ \ ~--,(Area 4) 1 \ esaior Cr T r t Ur \ ; _S CITY OF TIGARD f:, 96\97 hg ys~rojects shadtreeUhadtre ap~(fanncrk.p~ " 9713 Tigard 20A9 Tmos Figure 9 GENESIS - PATHFINDER AND TERRACE TRAILS GREENWAYS (see figures 10 and 11) Site Description: This greenway corridor lies along a wooded stream channel between developed residential properties in the west central area of Tigard. A paved trail runs the length of the Genesis-Pathfinder section of the corridor. A gravel trail runs the length of the Terrace Trails portion of the greenway. Side trails connect the corridor with adjacent neighborhood areas. The woodland in this greenway is all second growth. Alder is the dominant trees species in this corridor. Czeneral Recommendations: There are a few open areas immediately along the stream. We recommend that Willow be planted in these pockets. (Qtantity) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (60) Northwest Willow / Salix lucida ssp lasiandra - 1 gallon There is one moderate sized open area covered with blackberries near the eastern end of this greenway. We recommend that the berries be cut down and Douglas Fir be planted to fill the area. uantity) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (SD) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii - 18"-24" tall (2 gallon) Alders along the corridor are a relatively short lived tree. While the trees in the corridor are generally in good condition we recommend in-fill planting with longer lived (climax) tree species. Western Hemlock and Western Red Cedar are climax tree species in this type of woodland. We recommend planting these trees throughout the corridor to begin the process of providing a more stable woodland. (Quantity Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (200) Western Hemlock / Tsiuga heteroph»11a and /200) Western Red Cedar / Thuiaplicata - 12 "-18" tall (I gallon): No specific planting locations are selected for these trees. They will be planted in scattered groups along the entire length of the corridor. 22 9713rept.fnl mill MIMM I 1.~ ~f ST l 1 1 ' h GENESIS/ T ff: S' PATHFINDER F co CREENWAY I to R DAR AND HEMLOCK BN•FBL AREaA PARK OR FIR PLANTING AR GREENWAY BOUNDARY Schematic Tree' WILLOW PLANTING AREA Panting f Tigard 200 r C Trees Project N GR LL C' i r~ Ltt- - N Q pl Existing Trees ODE ~~t a F \ % 1 I r NOTE: ILLOW PLANTING A i A • l 1 this map is of ageneralized nature and should not be 4~ ~ r 1 J used for detailed measurmenis. 77 v ~''t I; I I ( Percival Associates 1R-PILL) - Landscape Architecture % • , CEDAR AND HEMLOCK PARK ST PAR November 21,1997fi ee till= i ! I I 1 inch - 250 feet 10 a IMI 1. M~ i k a j TERRACE TRAILS GREENWAYS CITY OF TIGARD a ..I e e 10191471: islprojeclslshadtree\shadtree.apt(GENESIS.pd) Figure 10 9713 T*Rfd 2000 Trees i !r ~,~..s. r~GLe.....1.:.ya °~:~o.. -raa-+~. .Le~$-.r-rtum~.~. rw.._..e...~. ~d`ou '„fir.. u... -rs..~Yw.,~.. - ~r.~+nw-•..r.r.ua ! w ~6a_.+~_L_.~ ~HL~..-u~`~~u'i.... _1w. AAY-.JvJ.-.~_ ia[..YW+LL n--:a.,~w-~y(~rp+6~-e-.S. nr::~~..un~ .~1_._.._ a~A 1 yt Z ~ • .•D°- TERRACE - GENESIS PATHFINDER GREENWAY - TRAILS/HOLLY r C} I h (SeeFtre10) i TREE/ \ ~ ✓ CREEKSiDE i f; ,r aP' GREENWAYS ExistingBamboo - ~i;~ I \ PARK OR O.. GREENWAY r-71 C~p -A C:- BOUNDARY 1 Tigard 2000 r 'Trees Project Schematic Tree , Planting Plan CEDAR AND HEMLOCK IN-FILL PLANTING AREA _FAIRHAVEN ; x Bri9ge Al Ilk Al NOTE: r 9 , this map is of ageneralized P - nature used afornd detailed should mrot be easurments. Percival Associates Existing Rush ° Q--_-- - - - Landscape Architecture Existing Ivy'- November 21, 1997 ' FAIRVIEW 1 inch = 200 feet - R0_SE_VISTA_DR VIEWM®UNT - S Steep Slope CITY OF TIGAgD IM9197 1:lgisarotects%hadtree\shadtree.apgterrace.prt) 9713 Tipard 2000 Trees Figure 11 7 j! ff GENTLEWOODS GREENWAYS (no map provided) Site Descriplion: This group of greenway parcel lies near the eastern edge of Tigard in an area with residential properties, industrial developments, a small farm, and sizeable tracts of undeveloped land. There is little if any public access to these parcels. Until public access is available detailed evaluation of these sites is not possible and tree plantings are not recommended. General Recommendations: No planting of trees are recommended for this site. 23 9713rept.fnl GRANT GREENWAY (see Figure 12) Site Description: This modest sized flat greenway parcel is located just west of old downtown Tigard. Fanno Creek forms the northern border of the site. There are trees scattered sparsely over the site, but most of the area is overgrown by blackberry thickets. Most of the site lies well above the river and has the potential to be developed into an active park site. Planting trees in the upland portions of the site would be best accomplished after a master plan for the site is developed. The southern bank of the creek has few trees. Trees could be planted in this area without interfering with the future use of the site. Planting Recommendations: We recommend planting trees along the edge of the Fanno Creek to form a continuous tree lined corridor. Prior to planting trees blackberries will need to be removed from the planting areas. (Quantity) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (50) Scouler'.s Willow / Salix scouleriana. (50) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii, and (50) Oregon Ash / Fraxinus latifolia - 1 gallon 24 9713rept.fnl t - 7 `t `I ....:_~•i~.~.. .~+~.8._i ~ ..n,_..s~..L 31L n. a t_.. .w tv V. ..-..rS ._t+~.__~~_..¢ ~~-+s ~.-~Y..~~~ .,.~.~a'r__._._._.~...~_.ur amt J. l.a~ ~,r-.--~e.~.s~x~utl4 fC ~.y.w .v._~.=c_.,. ,..y.. YIcY-+~. !4.uwr._r .u.v1Y.~..~...w.~_.._.u c.__,.r~.--...`w - r+-..-~+npG 1 GRANT t GREENWAY a o 6 0 Y B GREEK SIDE PLANTING PARK OR GREENWAY BOUNDARY Schematic a3 Tree Existing Woodland Planting Plan r Tigard 2000 Trees Project NOTE: this map is of ageneral'aed nature and should not be used for detailed measurments. a Percival Associates r Landscape Architecture November 21, 1997 i / 1 inch = 75 feet ! N W E S 9 OR CITY OF TIGARD '-1111b197 I:Vialpwlects\ahad3meWmdtree.aprTGRDVILL.prt} ' Flg3713 Tigard 2000 Trees Urt I r . .a - GREENBURG GREENWAYS (no map provided) Site Descriplion• These two well wooded parcels in northeast Tigard do not present suitable opportunity for planting additional trees. General Recommendations-: No tree plantings are recommended for this site. 25 9713rept.fnl IIILLSHIRE WOODS GREENWAYS (no map provided) Site Description: These two parcels are located in western Tigard. A high voltage electrical transmission corridor runs through the edge of the westerly most of these two sites. The remainder of the parcels is well covered by second growth Douglas Fir and related species. The sites are steeply sloped and have very limited public access. Most of the greenway boundaries abut directly up to private residences. These sites afford no suitable opportunity for planting additional trees. Planting Recommendations: No tree plantings are recommended for this site. Providing suitable management of these woodlands is a matter which the City will need to come to terms with. The new development along the woodland edges have opened up the trees to the forces of wind and weather. Past experience has shown that there will likely be loss of trees along the perimeter. This presents unique challenges to the City staff. 26 9713rept.fnl JACK PARK, JACK CREEK, SUMMER CREEK AND FOWLER GREENWAYS (see Figure 13) Site Description: This group of parks and green spaces is located in the residential northwestern area of Tigard. Jack Park is the only developed park in this group. The other sites are all natural greenway corridors along local streams. The only trails in these sites are those running through Jack Park and a short dead end section in Fowler Greenspace. Jack Creek runs to the northeast out of Jack Park. It is a well vegetated riparian corridor. No significant opportunities for tree planting where noted in this area. Summer Creek runs to the east out of Summer Lake Park and through Fowler Greenspace. East of 121 st Avenue it is a well vegetated corridor and no significant tree planting opportunities were noted. Summer Creek between Summer Lake Park and 121 st Avenue is in need of significant trees plantings. However, the City is presently in the process of engaging a consultant to develop engineering drawings and revegetation plans for this area. Therefore, we are not identifying any planting recommendations for this parcel. Jack Park is a small neighborhood park. The triangulLir shaped park is bordered by Jack Creek on the east, single family residences on the west, and an apartment complex on the north. The majority of the park is covered by mown lawn. A modest size grove of mature Douglas Fir is located in the eastern section of the lawn area. A small creek flows along the eastern edge of the park. Few trees grow along the banks of the creek. Blackberries have become established along some portions of the creek banks in the park. Fowler Greenspace contains a thick riparian woodland along the banks of Summer Creek which runs along the west and south sides of the park. A grass and open wetland area occupies the central area of the park. A short paved trail enters the site from SW 113th and terminates in the center of the site. A thicket of blackberries have grown up along the trail. Planting Recommendations: We recommend planting trees in three areas of a k ark. We recommend planting a line of Giant Sequoias along the northern border to provide some visual buffering between the park and the adjacent housing. These trees should be planted far enough apart to maintain openings for clear viewing of the park from the adjacent apartments. (Qttanti!y) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (9) Giant Sequoia J Sequoiadendron giganteum - 8 ft. height We recommend planting deciduous trees (Sugar Maples) around the south, east, and north edges of the basketball court to provide seasonal color and shade for users of the court. (Quantity Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (12) Sugar Maple /Aces Saccharinum 'Green Mountain" - 2 inch caliper 27 9713rept.fnl The banks of the creek along the eastern edge of the park have only a few trees. About one-third the length is covered by blackberry thickets. We recommend removal of the blackberries and planting Alder, Willow and Western Red Cedar. (Quanti ) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (45) Red Alder /Alnus rubra (30) Scouler's Willow /Salix scotderiana and (24) Western Red Cedar / Thuia Plicata - 2 gallon We recommend removal of the blackberries along the pathway in Fowler Greenspace and planting of Douglas Fir and Scouler's Willow along this area. (Quantify) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (60 Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuza menziesh and (40) Scouler's Willow / Salix scouleriana - 2 gallon. 28 9713rept.fnl r, :A r B~. c f <<, SUMMER, LAKE PAR SIMMER I~ I I I PL -lrl JACK r, ° • PARK 4, LAKE PL SUIT ER C EEK STU Y R \ Tigard 2000 a w o; Trees Project i ~ • Q' w TIGARD ~ - VILLA E ARKLN ° LU i ° • $ ' i e PARK OR ! @rJ 4R INTER o~;• 04 ME ESTONECT T / GREENVIfAY a ° • ' w \ / 1 i BOUNDARY Exls' RP land and Native Shru s r a • °•.~oy N RISE DR > Schematic Tree) - FALCON ' r' w is ti.ti.` N Planting Plan , a Existing Woodland x a + D CT T x = ryI I ! i KATHERINE ST I T ~DE PLANTING AREA i- r } / N l i } I -HATHERIN T J C~ i Well an ! 11 Woodlan d. `J" W i 0 I x x in PL JACK CREEK m m` NOTE: > 1~~1 This map is of a generalized I a nature and should not be R f x~ N used for detailed measurments. i FOWLER GREENSPACE f Percival Associates EVERGREEN TREE P NTING ~R - 7 1 i ANN Landscape Architecture \ BRQO_KCT^-~i (tdavernber12,1997 r N JAC PARK 1 inch = 400 feet _ -I L J i N Existing Douglas Flr_ 1 Jl~,. . Sw • CREEK EDGE PLANT N ( -1 Se«N E _J E Ax 5WE a ST N I CREEK EDG9_ELA„NTIN , x: . . . tdAR(E c I Basketball Court i r.i a io s,ai I gsa~°;.~~` ECIDUGUS TREE PLANTING AREA CITY OF I RD s j 9713 TPrd 200o Trees Figure 13 i _ -777- i SCHECKLA GREENWAY (see Figure 14) Site Description: This is a small wooded site with a small stream course running through middle. There is a paved trail running through the site to provide a pedestrian connection between the residential areas on the north and south sides of the site. A small area on the northern edge of the site has been disturbed by past construction and a black berry thicket has become established in this area. A section of the stream edge is bare of vegetation and is showing signs of erosion. Planting Recommendations: We recommend removal of the blackberries and planting this area with Western Red Cedar. Along the bare portion of the stream we recommend planting Vine Maple. (Quantity) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (25) Western Red Cedar / ThuLplicata and (15) Vine Maple /Acer circinatum - 2 gallon 29 9713rept.fnl a7 1 ~ r M S Tigard 2000 ~ SCHECK PARK Schematic Free Trees Project GREEN WAY Planting Plan i inch a 50 feet N November 21, 1997 a' PARK OR NOTE: Percival Associates CITY F Tle GREENiWAY w E this map is of ageneralized Landscape Architecture . BOUNDARY nature and should not be 11/18/97 I:Vastpr®octstahadtree\shadtree.spr(schecida.prt) _ ya s used for detailed measurments. 6x• ~j • i Trail 1 • stream C i m ~ o o z W I i . y ,E r s ILING ST l ~ .j 8713 Tigard 20~D9 Tres E r SUMMERLAKE PARK (see Figure 15) Site Description: This is a community park located on the western edge of Tigard. It is one of the City's larger developed parks. The park contains both developed recreation areas and natural landscapes. The damming of Summer Creek at the western edge of the park formed a small lake (Summerlake) in the center of the site. The lack of water depth and inadequate water flow in the summer leads to poor water quality in the lake during summer months. Irrunediately around the lake edge, lawn maintenance was restricted a number of years ago and this area has begun to naturalize. A number of trees have been planted within this zone. These trees are beginning to provide some shading of the lake edge. On the south western edge of the lake a natural wetland and sizable woodland of mature Douglas Fir has been preserved. Two small islands are located in the middle of the lake. One is covered by trees and shrubs. The other is covered by grasses. The northern and southwestern areas above the lake are developed parklands. A small play ground is located in the area south of the lake. Paved paths, soft trails, and bridges provide for pedestrian access throughout the park. The western portion of the park has been developed and provides off street parking, restrooms, picnicking areas, a playground, a small ballfield, tennis courts, and basketball court. A small creek emerges from a storm pipe at the southern edge of this area. The upper portion of this creek corridor is bare of any shrub or tree cover. Planting Recommendations: Improvements of habitat around the lake and enhancement of the water quality within the lake are important goals which provide the basis for planting around the lake. We recommend providing plantings along the eastern, southern, and western edges of the lake which will provide a thick and continuous tree cover. (Quantity) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (50) Scouler's Willow /,Salix scouleriana. (SO) Columbia River Willow / Salix fluviatilis (200) Red Alder /Alnus rubra. (75) Western Red Cedar / ThuLplicata. (100) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii (10) Cottonwood / Populus trichocarl2g (100) Oregon Ash / Fraxinus fait olia - 1 gallon We recommend tree planting on the grass covered island. Past plantings on the island have failed due to damage by beaver and nutria. We recommend installing a 'chicken wire' fence supported with metal 'T' posts all around the island to prevent critter damage. (Qttatttity) Common Name/Botanical Name -Planting Size (15) Western Red Cedar / Thuia plicata. (20) Scouler's Willotit and (30) Oregon Ash / Fraxinus lati olia - 2 gallon We recommend planting groves of evergreen trees in the rough grass areas along the northern bank. These groves will provide habitat for song birds and mitigate the visual impact of the adjacent buildings on that side of the park and still provide views of the lake from the adjacent homes. 30 9713rept. fnl (Quantl ) Common NameBotani al Name - Planting Size (30) ouelas Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii and Q) Western Red Cedar / Thriia ata - 18"- 24" height (2 gallon): plant in tight groves of three to six trees of the same species. Along the path leading from Winter Lake Drive to the playground in the southeast corner of the park we recommend installing Red Oaks evenly spaced along both sides of the pathway. ( uantity) Common Name/Botani al Name - Planting Size (20) Red Oak / Quercus rubra - 2" caliper Along the eastern edge of the sidewalk along Winter Lake Drive we recommend planting a row of Tulip Poplars. (Quantl ) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (34) Tulip P!2nlar / Liriodendron tulipifera - 3"caliper: plant centered on the trees adjacent to the street. We recommend planting Flowering Pear trees along the eastern edge of the curved walk at the outfield edge of the ballfield. (Quanft Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (6) Flowering Pear / Pvrus c 'Red Spire'- 3" caliper We recommend planting native trees along the 'West Stream' just downstream of the storm pipe outfall. After the trees are planted, it is recommended that the grasses in this area would no longer be mown and that the area be allowed to naturalize. (Quantl ) Common NameBotanical Name - Planting Size (40) Oregon Ash / Fraxinus latif is Western Red Cedar / Th?{ia nlicata and (20) Scouler's Willow / Salix scouleriana - 2 gallon 31 9713rept.fnl SUMMERLAKE f ~ Qgro PARK WAY VNINTERLAKE GREENWAY Tigard 2000 (ee,Figure I Trees Project I November 5, 1991 w EI r. stream PARK OR GREENINAY r i `T I LAS LA ING AR BOUNDARY D chamaft Treat . NORTH SHORE J Planting Plan WEST I ' ; i ( I /ST SI IORE ern ~ . "L) ~ / • ; t I j k Island Lake EDGEWATER MI / _ Tennis Courts Bridge !r ~ l 6ssketha Courts C urts p~ r S _ Lake u ~ la roun NOTE: ~laygrourid a EAST SHORE this map is of ageneralized Wet Phead Grass nature and should not be Area Area T f used for detailed measurments. SOUTH SNORE V Percival Associates Landscape Architecture OUTFIELD TRAIL REA• L° AREA.. Woodlan ' OAK TREE PLANTING 'Shel r ~ 1 - 01 Sidewalks Restroom Residence Grass Area ~'Le~'+ e~° i °m® Stream 1 INCH ® 200 FEET ! WES STREA REA f d°J i V Paging Lot " cert e T T'TREE•PLANTING LAKE 1 5~ r1 A r I i a~ ~ ! 9129197 tig2/syslgislnrojectslshad eelshadtree.ape(eminrtakeprq-- CITY OF TIGARD i Figure IS r ' 9713 Tigard 2000 Treas ,i P i^I f i r!, i S p _ 3 TIGARD STREET GREENWAY (see Figure 16) Site Description: This greenway runs north-south along Fanno Creek, just west of Interstate 217, in north central Tigard. A full stand of Ash and other riparian vegetation follows the course of the stream. However, between this narrow wooded corridor and the path along the west side of the greenway, past construction activities have removed the tree cover. This area is now open and covered by a monoculture of the invasive Reed-Canary Grass. Planting Recommendations: We recommend planting trees which reestablish the native riparian woodland cover throughout the Canary Grass area. (Quantity) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (150) Oregon Ash/ Fraxinus latifolia. (100) Scouler'.s Willow /Salix scouleriana. (50,) Northwest Willows / Salix sessilifolia. (100) Red Alder / Alnus rubra. (25 Western Red Cedar / Tuja plicata, and (25) Douggs Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii - 1 gallon 32 9713rept.fnl !_..c1..._.~.i .N, _~r.e...~~~,.~._.~i._.._ ._,......,_;~_....i: y.._..~__ _..._,,...,..a..,._r,m...,,....~..J.,,_..m.~~-~.--~..~-~...... .._sw ..c..,~'kr ,.,.ry _"...i u.,...~.,srg ~_...~_:.i.._,_,...'.~-_...~..~,..:..c~:f..~,-.,~.~r..~,,..,.d~.~..._..s..:..~•...,...~J,..i_....s.__ ':~i A_. Tigard t. , < < Greenway Tigard 2000 " Trees Project v PARK OR GREENWAY BOUNDARY Srhelrnatic Tree ' Planting Plan . e I--- WEST STREAM PLANTING AREA NOTE: this map is of ageneralized nature and should not be used for detailed measurments. t (teed canary Grass Percival Associates • ' Landscape Architecture November 20, 1997~ 1 INCH =100 FEET t i ' _ N w E S d•t• r _I j . Bridge T I CITY OF TIGARD 11112W tig2 syslgislprojectslshadtreelshadtree.apr(tigardst.prt) Figure 16 9713 Tigard 2000 Trans _ 1 ~ L - r WINTERLAKE GREENWAY (see Figure 17)' Site Descrialion: This site is located west and upstream from Summer Lake Park. Summer Creek meanders east to west through the site. This parcel is a wide corridor paralleling the course of the creek with a short stub of land extending to the north near the eastern end of the greenway. Most if not all of the site could be classified as wetland. Seasonal high stream flows spread out to cover all but the highest land along the edges. The southern banks of the creek are well covered by trees. The area north of the creek, including the small spur, is barren of trees except for a few clusters of Willow and Ash. There is evidence that some previous efforts have been made to plant trees on the northern areas. At the time of our site visits nearly all of these trees had died. The area where the trees were planted is too wet for the trees to survive. At the western end, north of the stream course, a new development has installed some sparse riparian plantings and has established a water quality facility in or adjacent to the Greenway. The plantings are just completed and we could not evaluate the successfulness of these efforts. Planting Recommendations: Our goal for this Greenway is to establish a continuous and full woodland on the northern shore and to fi;! in the few open areas on the south side of the creek. The high water table throughout most of the corridor makes the use of Willow species useful in most of the planting areas. However, we are recommending planting of Ash along the wetland edges and Cedar and Alder in the relatively drier riparian areas along the northern edge of the corridor. (Quantity Common I'_gme/Botanical Name - Planting Size (300) Scouler Willow / Salix scouleriana. (300 Pacific Willow / Salix 1. lasiandra. (300) Northwest Willow / Salix se vili olia. and (300) Columbia River Willow / Salix fluviatilis - Live Cut Stems, 30"-36" long, with eight to ten(+) viable growth buds in the upper 50% of the stem. Bury at least 12" deep into soggy soils where indicated infield. (200) Oregon Ash / Fraxinus latifolia. (50) Scouler's Willow / Salix scouleriana. (.i0) Red Alder/ Alnus rubra. (50) Western Red Cedar / Thuia plicata - I gallon 33 9713rept.fnl . ,.......4.~._._...-_ _._~~'.-y.-.,s-~___V..... __..i'a`~-.f u.wi,._.,..` ,....-+.,,~.,.L,~... ~sl:...,,.-L O.., ~a~..~"w:.«...L...a1-..w.. ~.,.c.~., ate, s„~ c. .a.. _,.w....•... ,.u_. ~,..._a._~L_.~.~~.._,......_._._...,~...,i~~,w..~.u.~.aa..,~.. w.,....~....,.. ._.~1.,._~.. _ R ll ~ o j - - Winterlake/ b UJ ' Castels at Erilteny/ ;135th Ave Greenweys ( Tigard 2000 Trees Project w 1 PARK OR S HAWK ° _ _ r REENWAY BEARD IA i BOUNDARY steep Slope 1I o ----f: Schematic Tree ~IPipe~j~ Planting Plan CT) NORTH PLANTING AREA ' qN WAY Exis6ngi~Sedgo • :•y Steep Slope • Existing Trees _ NORTH STREAM SIDE PLANTING AREA I NOTE: this map is of ageneralized y" r , nature and should not be used for detailed measurments. ; Water Quality Welland i Existing Trees e ` Percival Associates L_.___ - • ~ Landscape Architecture ® Bridge November20,1897 B stream ®rtl~ i ' 1 INCH 150 FEET ppd. rrn SOUTH STREAM SIDE PLANTING AREA w E Ji ^ s SUMMER LAKE PARK r - - ~r (See Figure 15)i LLJ i 11112\97 tig2tsyslgisVrojectsthadtreelshadtree.apr(wntrlake,prt) CITV OF qlGARD Figure 17 97tsTigamzoooTrees .71 a ~ WOOIDARID PART{ (see Figure 18) Site Description: This park is located in central Tigard along Fanno Creek. The park is composed of mown lawn with a good cover of mature deciduous trees. Along the banks of Fanno Creek rough grass and riparian vegetation predominates. While much of the stream course is lined by trees there are significant open areas where blackberries are becoming established. Planting Recommendations: We recommend filling in the open areas along the creek side to provide a continuous corridor of trees. There is no irrigation system in the park so plantings will need to be sized the same as they would be in a natural area (Quand&) Common Name/Botanical Name - Planting Size (10) Douglas Fir / Psuedotsuga menziesii and (30) YVestern Red Cedar / Thuia nlicata - 18"- 24" height (2 gallon) (50) Black Hawthorne / Crataegus douglasii (75) Oregon Ash / Fraxinus latifolia, and (30) Red Alder/ Alnus rubra- I gallon N a 34 9713rept.fnl - ~ 1 I , , i~ 4-~.,; ,.+......a...._ .,....,..~1~ ~.~r~_.. ~ a».i t a. ...i.. ....e~ y._.~,..... s,..._....,y...~W....._..y_.~., y l+ .++wvr .1 i.~is1.. ~ - i._. , _ ..._..-..y .an.a_............,..-~.....~.-~rw+:.~+,d.v.-,._m..-....w _ . -.wa.. ,.[.+.u.x......•w.ti;- t~ ..-.w WOO DARD, PARK r Tigard 2000 Trees Project t PARK OR GREENWAY BOUNDARY • NORTH CREEK PLANTING AREA Schematic Tree Planting Pia Lawn Area with Scattered frees r WEST CREEK PLANTING AREA j , • M ' enance Access / EAST CREEK PLANTIN REA NOTE: -l 1 SOUTH CRK P TING AREA ` this map is of ageneralized nature and should not be I used for detailed measurments. Existing Woodland n i Percival Associates Landscape Architecture Bridge / _Plevember 11, 1997 (I~ Sidewalk 1 Tea 9 inch = 900 feet { a *90 j I I ~ { CM OF TIGARR 1019971:1gislprojects\shadtree\rhadtree.apr(woodward.prt) f rx { 'r F1g1aT6 18 9713 Tigard 2000 Trees t• 114th STORM DRAIN OUTFALL (see Figure 19) Site Description: A new storm drain outfall for 114th Street needed to be constructed in a greenway at the end 114th Street. Construction activities lead to he removal of existing vegetation in the area where the pipe and outfall were constructed. The surrounding vegetation was a combination of grassland and Ash and Hawthorne woods. Most of the disturbed area was covered by blackberry thickets prior to construction. Planting Recommendations: We recommend planting native tree species in groves to help discourage the regrowth of the blackberries. An access corridor must be kept open to the newly installed manholes. Tree plantings must be kept out of this corridor. (,QuantiU) Common 1`Jame/Botanical Name - Planting Size (20) Black Hawthorne / Crataegue douglasii (50) Oregon Ash / Fraxinus latifolia, and (0) Douglas Fir / P uedotsuga menziesii - 1 gallon 35 9713rept.fnl 14 STORM F Existing Woodland . 114TH 11 6m AE i GRAIN Amass route ®UTFALL HAWTHORNE AND ASH PLANTING Tigard 2000 Trees Project fisting Woodland Schematic Tree Planting Phan open Grass Area Manhole Manhole WILLOW PLANTING AREA DOUGLAS FIR PLANTING • . , NOTE: this map is of ages-eralized New Storm Pipe Outfall nature and should not be used for detailed measurments. Abandon 8" Pipe y Percival Associates Landscape Architecture 1 inch= 20 feet l I Fanno Creek 7 E 1 CITY OF TIGA D ' 9713 Tigard 2000 Tme Figure 19 L i t Appendices e s e t A Tree Planti'►~ host APPendix A " uaa~tity and ~ gecommendatS ~Qagy w 1 APPENDIX A - Tree Planting Recommendations: Quanti , !anti Cost Summary location tree common name size quantity unit cost total Benchview Greenway Douglas Fir 1 gal. 75 $ 9.00 $675.00 Black Hawthorne 35 $ 9.00 $315.00 Western Crabapple 35 $ 9.00 $315.00 subtotal = 145 $1,305.00 Castlehill Greenway Douglas Fir 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 Western Red Cedar 25 $ 9.00 $225.00 Red Alder 75 $ 9.00 $675.00 Black Hawthorne 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 Ponderosa Pine 36" hgt. 70 $ 12.00 $840.00 subtotal = 270 $2,640.00 Colony Creek Greenway Columbia River Willow cutting 500 (not $ 1.50 $750.00 in totals) Red Alder 1 gal. 120 $ 9.00 $1,080.00 Oregon Ash 4' hgt. 100 $ 11.50 $1,150.00 subtotal = 220 $2,980.00 Cook Park Red Oak 3" cal. 40 $ 300.00 $12,000.00 Red Alder 15 $ 250.00 $3,750.00 Douglas Fir 4' hgt. 70 $ 35.00 $2,450.00 Western Red Cedar 4' hgt. 70 $ 35.00 $2,450.00 Cottonwood 6' hgt. 15 $ 23.00 $345.00 Oregon Ash 6' hgt. 20 $ 23.00 $460.00 Douglas Fir 1 gal. 475 $ 9.00 $4,275.00 Western Red Cedar 75 $ 9.00 $675.00 Appendix A - 1 9713appn.00a location tree common name size quantity unit cost total a Ponderosa Pine 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 Black Hawthorne 1 gal. 200 $ 9.00 $1,800.00 Pacific Crabapple 150 $ 9.00 $1,350.00 Willow (all) 340 $ 9.00 $3,060.00 sub-total = 1520 S33,065.00 Dover Landing-Pick's Landing-Willowbrook Fann Greenways Douglas Fir 200 $ 9.00 $1,800.00 Western Red Cedar 200 $ 9.00 $1,800.00 Western Hemlock 200 $ 9.00 $1,800.00 sub-total = 600 $5,400.00 Englewood Park Douglas Fir 75 $ 9.00 $675.00 Oregon Ash 35 $ 9.00 $315.00 Red Alder 35 $ 9.00 $315.00 Scouler's Willow 2 gal. 20 $ 15.00 $300.00 Red Alder 2" cal. 28 $ 160.00 $4,480.00 sub-total = 193 S6,085.00 Fanno Creek Park Oregon Ash 1 gal. 60 $ 9.00 $540.00 Scouler's Willow 140 $ 9.00 $1,260.00 Douglas Fir 60 $ 9.00 $540.00 Western Red Cedar 215 $ 9.00 $1,935.00 Oregon Ash 2 gal. 45 $ 15.00 $675.00 Scouler's Willow 35 $ 15.00 $525.00 Red Alder 50 $ 15.00 $750.00 Black Hawthorne 15 $ 15.00 $225.00 Sweet Gum 3" cal. 6 $ 300.00 $1,800.00 sub-total = 626 S8,250. 00 Appendix A - 2 9713appn.00a -111 MMIII IIIIIIIIIIIII location tree common name size quantity unit cost total Genesis-Pathfinder and Terrace Trails Greenways Northwest Willow 1 gal. 60 $ 9.00 $540.00 Western Hemlock 200 $ 9.00 $1,800.00 Western Red Cedar 200 $ 9.00 $1,800.00 Douglas Fir 2 gal. 50 $ 15.00 $750.00 sub-total = 510 $4,890.00 Grant Greenway Scouler's Willow 1 gal. 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 Douglas Fir 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 Oregon Ash 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 sub-total = 150 $1,350.00 Jack Park, Jack Creek, Summer Creek, and Fowler Greenways Giant Sequoia 8' hgt. 9 $ 100.00 $900.00 Sugar Maple 2" cal. 12 $ 180.00 $2,160.00 Red Alder 2 gal. 45 $ 15.00 $675.00 Scouler's Willow 11 70 $ 15.00 $1,050.00 Douglas Fir 60 $ 15.00 $900.00 Western Red Cedar 24 $ 15.00 $360.00 sub-total = 220 $6,045.00 Scheckla Greenway Western Red Cedar 25 $ 15.00 $375.00 Vine Maple 15 $ 15.00 $225.00 sub-total = 40 $600.00 Summerlake Park Willows (all) 1 gal. 100 $ 9.00 $900.00 Red Alder 11 200 $ 9.00 $1,800.00 Western Red Cedar 1 gal. 75 $ 9.00 $675.00 Appendix A - 3 9713appn.00a location tree common name size quantity unit cost total Douglas Fir 100 $ 9.00 $900.00 Cottonwood 10 $ 9.00 $90.00 Oregon Ash 100 $ 9.00 $900.00 Willows (all) 2 gal. 40 $ 15.00 $600.00 Western Red Cedar 60 $ 15.00 $900.00 Douglas Fir 30 $ 15.00 $450.00 Oregon Ash 70 $ 15.00 $1,050.00 Red Oak 2" cal. 20 $ 180.00 $3,600.00 Tulip Poplar 3" cal. 34 $ 275.00 $9,350.00 Flowering Pear 3" cal. 6 $ 275.00 $1,650.00 sub-total = 845 $22,865.00 Tigard Street Greenway Oregon Ash 1 gal. 150 $ 9.00 $1,350.00 Scouler's Willow 100 $ 9.00 $900.00 Northwest Willow 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 Red Alder 100 $ 9.00 $900.00 Western Red Cedar 25 $ 9.00 $225.00 Douglas Fir 25 $ 9.00 $225.00 sub-total = 450 S4,050.00 Winterlake Greenway Willows (all) cuttting 1200 $ 1.50 $1,800.00 (not in totals) Scouler's Willow 1 gal. 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 Oregon Ash 200 $ 9.00 $1,800.00 Red Alder 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 Western Red Cedar 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 sub-total = 1550 $4,95!1.00 Woodard Park Appendix A - 4 9713appn.00a location tree common name size quantity unit cost total Red Alder 1 gal. 30 $ 9.00 $270.00 Oregon Ash 75 $ 9.00 $675.00 Black Hawthorne 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 Douglas Fir 2 gal. 10 $ 15.00 $150.00 Western Red Cedar 30 $ 15.00 $450.00 sub-total = 195 $1,995.00 114th Storm Drain Outfall Black Hawthorne 1 gal. 20 $ 9.00 $180.00 Oregon Ash 19 50 $ 9.00 $450.00 Douglas Fir 40 $ 9.00 $360.00 sub-total = 110 $990.00 GRAND TOTAL = 7644 $107,460.00 Costs indicated above are calculated to include all costs associated with the furnishing and proper installation of plantings. Associated costs, such as those for site clearing, have been added into the unit prices. However, these are only estimates of probable costs and actual bid costs are likely to vary from the figures provided above. 1 Appendix A - 5 9713appn.00a Appendix B -'T'ree Planting Details APPENDIX B: Planting Dew& TREE PLANTING IN NATURAL AREAS (Details A and D) SOD/WEED MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED AND PLACED OUTSIDE DIAMETER GEXISTING RADE MULCHED AREA. 2' ill I - I ROOTBAL L i - DEPTH -I' EXCAVATED SOIL SUITABLE FOR USE I AS BACKFILL UNDISTURBED SCARIFY EDGES SUBGR.4DE AND BOTTOM OF HOLE DIAMETER OF ROOTBALL +I' NATURAL AREA PLANTING HOLE not to scale section 36' LENGHT - 1/2' DIA. WOODEN DOWEL 12' LENGTH SURVEY PAINTED WHITE. DOWEL REQUIRED ONLY TAPE TIED TO DOWEL FOR TREES LESS THAN 4' TALL AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. TREE OR SHRUB r ` 24 BACKFILL HOLE WITH EXISTING SOIL SOIL 2' DEPTH OF MULCH BERM EXISTING GRADE 3' ~ A i SET TOP OF 12' ROOTBALL I' ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE HH4 UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE DIAMETER oi-R&NATURAL AREA TREE PLANTING not to sc.a le ~B!-REE section Appendix B - I 9713appn.00b TREE PLANTING IN LAWN AREAS (Detail Q 'GRO-STRAIGHT' TREE TIE GALV. STEEL WIRE: INSTALL WITH SLACK TO ALLOW 4' 2X2 WOOD STAKE: OF FREE LATERAL DOUGLAS FIR, (3) MOVEMENT PER TREE 4 FT. DIAMETER CIRCLE OF BARK MULCH 3' DEEP. REMOVE 50D BEFORE W PLACING MULCH _ EXISTING FINISH 011 GRADE N '11 I-111=11 I i-I 11-III ~ III- ~ n ~ -1I =1I -I I I I1-I I I- (L '11111 lill 1111 pQ: OpC IIE111111!161 111-111-111=111=gill-III- ~ II I~. 0 ZA 11=1 I I4Z =1I 1=! I I- -1I I- 11=! EXCAVATED SOIL USED I I I I I II I I II11 III. AS BACKFILL MATERIAL I i I I I I I I' 11 I ROOTBALL: REMOVE Ji- TWINE, BURLAP, AND ROOTBALI_ DIAMETEf4 WIRE BASKET FROM PLUS 6' TOP AND SIDES ~ TAE E I N L, ~tJlJi®1 rn04, t0 SGaIe r' S~°Gtl0r1 - ..mow Appendix B - 2 9713appn. oob A Appendix C -Implementation Phase 1: Estimate of Probable Construction Costs e ARPENDLK . mn ementadon Phase 1: Estimate of Probable Construction Costs (Cook Park. City Hall/Fanno Creek, and Summerlakg) Item quantity unit unit cost total L COOK PARK A. Mobilization 1 each $500.00 $500.00 B. Bond 1 $400.00 $400.00 C. Clearing Blackberries 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 D. Planting 1. Mulch 980 $1.50 $1,470.00 2. Marking Stakes (small material) 820 $1.50 $1,230.00 3. Plant Material (excavating hole and providing plants in place) a. Rough Grass Area North of Soccer Fields i. Douglas Fir (4' hgt.) 70 $33.00 $2,310.00 Psuedotsuga menziesii ii. Western Red Cedar (4' hgt.) 70 $33.00 $2,310.00 Thuja plicata b. New Wetlands East of Entry Road i. North Shore of Ponds (a) Douglas Fir (1 gal.) 300 $7.50 $2,250.00 Psuedotsuga menziesii ii. East of Ponds (a) Scouler's Willow (1 gal.) 50 $7.50 $375.00 Salix scouleriana (b) Northwest Willow (1 gal.) 30 $7.50 $225.00 Salix sessilifolia (c) Columbia River Willow (1 gal.) 30 each $7.50 $225.00 Salix fluviatilis (d) Douglas Fir (1 gal.) 75 $7.50 $562.50 Psuedotsuga menziesii (e) Western Red Cedar (1 gal.) 75 $7.50 $562.50 Thuja plicata Appendix C - 1 9713addn.00c Item quantity unit unit cost total (iii) South Shore of Ponds (a) Cottonwoods (6' hgt.) 15 $30.00 $450.00 Populus trichocarpa (b) Pacific Willow (1 gal.) 100 $7.50 $750.00 Salix lucida ssp. lasiandra (c) Scouler's Willow (1 Gal.) 100 $7.50 $750.00 Salix scouleriana c. Picnic and Boat Launch Area Along Tualatin River (southern edge of park) (i) Grass Picnic Area (a) Red Alder (3" caliper) 15 $250.00 $3,750.00 Alnus rubra (ii) River's Edge (a) Columbia River Willow (1 gal.) 30 $7.50 $225.00 Salix fluviatilis (b) Oregon Ash (6' hgt.) 20 $30.00 $600.00 Fraxinus latifolia Cook Park Total 980 X20.145.00 II. CITY HALL / FANNO CREEK A. Mobilization 1 $100.00 $100.00 B. Bond 1 $20.00 $20.00 C. Planting: Mulch, staking, and provide trees Sweet Gum (3" caliper) 6 each $300.00 $1,800.00 City Nall / Fanno Creek Total 6 51.920.00 III. SUMMERLAKE PARK: Native Tree Planting A. Mobilization 1 $400.00 $400.00 B. Bond 1 $550.00 $550.00 C. Mulch 845 $1.50 $1,267.50 Appendix C - 2 9713addn.00a Item quantity unit unit cost total D. Marking Stakes (small material) 805 $1.50 $1,207.50 E. Fence at Island 1 $500.00 $500.00 F. Plantings: 1. East, West, and South Lake Shore ' a. Scouler' Willow (1 gal.) 50 each $7.50 $375.00 Salix scouleriana b. Columbia River Willow (I gal.) 50 $7.50 $375.00 Salix fluviatilis c. Red Alder (1 gal.) 200 $7.50 $1,500.00 Alnus rubra d. Western Red Cedar (1 gal.) 75 $7.50 $562.50 Thuja plicata e. Douglas Fir (1 gal.) 100 each $7.50 $750.00 Psuedotsuga menziesii f. Cottonwood (1 gal.) 10 $7.50 $75.00 Populus trichocarpa g. Oregon Ash (1. gal.) 100 $7.50 $750.00 Fraxinus latifolia 2. Island Planting a. Western Red Cedar (2 gal.) 15 $15.00 $225.00 Thuja plicata b. Scouler's Willow ;2 gal.) 20 $15.00 $300.00 Salix scouleriana c. Oregon Ash (2 gal.) 30 $15.00 $450.00 Fraxinus latifolia 3. North Bank Planting a. Douglas Fir (2 gal.) 30 $14.00 $420.00 Psuedotsuga menziesii b. Western Red Cedar (2.gal.) 30 $14.00 $420.00 Thuja plicata 4. Storm Pipe Outfall at Winter Lake Drive (West Stream) a. Oregon Ash (2 gal.) 40 $14.00 $560.00 Fraxinus latifolia Appendix C - 3 9713addn.00c Item quantity unit unit cost total b. Western Red Cedar (2 gal.) 15 $14.00 $210.00 Thuja plicata c. Scouler's Willow (2 gal.) 20 $14.00 $280.00 Salix scouleriana Summerlake Park -Native 785 $11.377.50 Tree PlantfnQTotal IV. SUMMERLAKE PARK: Ornamental Tree Planting A. Mobilization 1 $100.00 $100.00 B. Bond 1 $100.00 $100.00 C. Planting: Plants, Mulch, and Stakes 1. Tulip Poplar (3" caliper) 34 $300.00 $10,200.00 Liriodendron tulipifera 2. Flowering Pear (3" caliper) 6 $300.00 $1,800.00 Pyrus c. "Red Spire" 3. Red Oak (3" Caliper) 20 $300.00 $6,000.00 Summerlake Park - 0 $18.000.00 Ornamental Tree Planting Total_ GRAD 'T'OTAL = 1831 $51,442.50 Appendix C - 4 9713addn.00c Appendix - Pann® Creek Watershed Management Plan (excerpts) Tho following are pages copied from the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. This plan was prepared by Kurahashi & Associates for the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County U.1taMQh G }pyAY1~1M Ce •~54;;,;;q F V ~/r t SV 1 upper Fanno { i N4J1o YYf• Q t rt0 Pend)eton 9 ® f 4 i 1 VormGnt 14~ -1 Z Woods f ' Y J • Aal- Middle Fanno Ash ~ - 1 Red Rock r1- t Iteon - t - Summer ",cka.,a. , _ 1_ ue- r • d ( y~ 1 Ball K f f ! r Fr., Kr®u9er, J Lower Fannon Derry Deli' > eou^eo~r Tualatin River f i f w Figure 15 High-Priority Project LocationS 69 Section V Fanno Creek watershed Rganagemeni Ptan Table 17A High-Priority Water Quality and Flood Management Projects L e s Comments U t Stream Reach Details F-4 Fenno- Ferraro Creak Driw 8arrk BfabNlzdbn Stabilize the streambeM in bad at the Fans Creek band 58 100 N Tlgard Protection of floodplain needed north of FIOIII title 150IA Protect extol trails frorn bet undermined (Tillard) F9 Fenno-Woodard Park Enhancement Plant nativevspslalion in riparian corridor (196,000 sq ft) A or pork maintenance practlces(ses non►etruclural) Install a bi aw" on fbodplain fringe behind Tigard Industrial 48 180 YN Tigard Improves water quality by shading, reducing erosion Park to teal parking lol runoff (parallel to edge of parking let) Reduces stormwaler poMants entering stream Replace or cover exposed sewsrlines Removes potential threat of pipe break r-12 Fenno- En2lowood Park Enhancemont Enhance existing pond by planting native vo ulauon (45,000 rig it) Englewood Park limited use Enhance / create forestal b shrubhcrub wetlands on 715,000 61 2349 Y Tigard Improves water quality by shading, reducing erosion eq it of open disturbed ftoodplain by scraping and replanting olgt Decreases foodng impacts Slope back stream banks 3800 Of and stabilize bad along Entrances wildlife habitat 1000111 F-14 Fenno - Fenno CroNc Floodplialln Enhancement increase floodplain storage and enhance 150.000 sq If of BYtn Decreases water quality bD shading, reducing erosion Improves flooding ts wetWxds at old Fenno WWTP site west of the crook by 54 452 Y USA IBenefits positive levels ku temporature, tlbsolved removing or reconfiguring berm (south of Denny) (orr+er) oxygen, arpae, best' 1orel phosphorous, and drier Plant native vegatstbn in riparian corridor nutrionis F-17 Fenno - Rambler 8ohmsnn Pond & Stream Enhancomairri Difficult but feasible access Increase flood storage upstream (OES and Tower Site) Convert existing pond to an oft-lire 90.000 sq A wetland with USA Neighborhood Association (FCNA) agreement and low flow creek in htstohc meanders (requires excavating 2.3 54 509 N FCNA support for change in condition fast: of sediment) Alter lantlscepe practkcas near the water (see non- structural programs) Flooding of homes here F-20 Fanno - IDES Marsh / Tower Site increase fxoodplain function by lowering streambank and Dflooding Impacts some marsh wow to reconnect system (300,000 sq a) 8ES Benefits positive levels for temperature, dissolved Add In-stream structure (large woody debris and rock Miles) W 1609 YN USA oxygen, algae, bacteria. texas phosphorous, and other to raise the straambed song 2200 IA nutrient removal Plant native v ation throughout SV-1 Ivan - Ralewood Park to Bancroft Pond Allow ecological succession to occur uninterrupted in rho Benefits are long term marsh 57 350 Y LISA Will take 68 years to ace successional changes Dredge Bancroft Pond to reduce homeowner flooding ODOT Flooding of two homes hers Acquire flood 9 properties when available RR-1 Red Rock - Railroad to Hwy 217 Siroam Enhancement Plaid native vegetation in nparmn corridor Hwy 217 to Huritzigor(10,000 sq it) Tigard Improves wafer quality by shading, rodueing erosion, and Create forested / shrub-acrub watiands for water quality to 58 220 N Owner blofltuallon either side of stream on vacant lands (70.000 sq n) Dip Plant native vegetation Wong the 'IrLaNlo' Pond edge SP-3 Ash - WsaM on uare Pretrealment S A-1 Inslall compost filter or other trowment with high flew bypass between Toye-R-Us 8 LP Gas to pretreat stormwmor draining 28 93 N Tigard Reduces stormwater powAards entering stream 31 acres 13-•1 am - confluence to"EAhancemerrt Pkud native vegataton In nparian corridor (up to 72nd Ave Tigard and Wong I.5) 48 34 N Owner Allor highway malmonsnee practices (ses non-structural Protect from spills, dumping, and trash in parking fd Woe 0007 programs) terries with solid 2' hi h base g oral Coet 5898 Acioroximstolv, 9.9 million • Load responsibility in bold. USA - Unified Sewerage ',29ncy. BES.Bureau of Environmental Services; 0007 - Oregm Department of Transportation; FCNA: Fenno Creek Neighborhood Association; olg's - other local governments Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 70 Table 17B Medium-Priority Water Quality and Flood Management Projects s ass W Comments a a a Stream Reach Details F-1 Fenno - Youth to Durham Rd. Conotruct a wetland or sweN (60.000 sq ftpo pretreat USA Oresnway acquisition of unprotected lloodplaln stomtwtter from 85th at Thomas Dairy Silo/ Durham 67 332 Y Wastewater Treatment Plant Tigard needed F-2 Fanno - Durham Rd. to Bonfta Stabilize BOO 111 of eroding stream banks on it* farm she Tigard Improves ester gwltty by shading, rotluelrp located just downstream of the Boll Creek confluonce so Igo N dg's Improves Protoct bank from livestock It talc F-6 Fenno - Rod Rock to Hall Blvd. Stabilas 600 M of stroambank Of farm site just out of Hall Tigard ProIW or acquire property (groompaces) Bald -t-^ 182 N olgti Improves wager quality by shading, reducing Plant native v atrdn In ri lan conkfor (35,000 s it) aroolon F-7 Fenno - Hap Blvd (Tigard City Neill) to Main Street Pram native vegetation in riparian condor (3200111) Aver park maintenance practices (sae non- Stabilize stream banks and bed In areas that threaten to 49 416 Y Tigard structural program) esDOSe server lines or may undermine structurmtpathways olgY Improves water quality by shading. reducing estimated t OOO linear feet erosion F-13 Fenno - Greener Park, K041 Carder Wetland Plant native vegetation in riparian condor and wetland edges Monitor Koll C..r wetland for siltation (30.000 sq 11) ®vtn Improves wager quality by shading, reducing Create 200.000 sq 11 of wotlands along stream edge by 40 1056 Y THPRD eroean grading banks back and reconnecting isolated wetlands by Monitor curtail at Nimbus for spills (source removing borms odgb control) Retrofit outlets with bloswalas where possible Implement SP-6 It still • problem F-16 Fenno- Allan Rd Ana Prslnalment Install compost filter drop In unit or other treatment now SP-8 fldodplam hinge just to the out of Western Ave (draining 77 27 205 N Bvin Reduces otormwater pollutants entering stream acres of commercial area off Allen F-10 Fenno - Portland Goff Club Plant native vegetation in riparian corridor (250,000 sq 11) USA Partner with golf club Restore natural stream cross section and conditions (private 66 1632 N PGC Evaluate fertilizer / chemical use as a possible coat) Reconi uro nd move off-lirim see W-1 (private cost o1g'p discharge to the creek F-22 Fenno, Chlnsee Restaurant Enhance pond by crowing an emergent or forested wetland (ngrade 40,000 sq A) LISA Benefits positive levels for temperature, DO, Reclaim south parlong area for off-line watland (22.500 aq 11) 53 388 N Owners algae, bacteria, total phosphorous, and other Stabilize and re eta stream banks and bed along 400 IA olgb nulnerit removal W-1 Woods - Hideaway Park Enhoncomont Ineteafs tbodplaln storage by oxcavsting soccer field 1 ft USA Benefits positive levels for temperature, DO, Enhance Iloodpiain vegetation by plardi g at Hideaway Park 57 700 Y THPRD aigm. bacteria, total phosphorous, and other (40.000 aq 1t) PGC nutrient removal Move on-line pond at Portlarttl God Course off-line (soe F-10) btg's Food peak roduclic-i downstream A-2 Ash - Hwy. 217 to HM Blvd. trines fktodpiain storage / welly d function by Tigard Iarosioortes wager quality by shading, reducing ramovlntghcdistribut rig All over 560,000 aq A now creek b2 toP~ N Owns Deasasao flooding Impacts Plant native vegetation in riparian corridor olgb Check Tigard and DSL requirements Needs to be timed with dear em of site 2LOM otai Cost 6576 Approximately 6.6 million ' Lead responsibility In bold. USA - Unified Sewerage Agency; THPRD c Tualatin Hills Park and Reaction DlsMa; PGC s Portland Gall Club; FCNA. Fenno Crook Neighborhood Association; oig's ■ other local governments Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 71 Table 17C Low-Priority Water Quality and Floored Management Projects ~ I CiOMAlf111f gleam Reach Details SP-1 Famw -Durham Rd. to Bonita O F-2 Pretreat 36 001(Rll Gast of Durham Rd with a compost Alter or 27 295 N Tigard Rodutes smrmwtlar pollutants entering drier tntlm." drains 111 acts Industrial area stream W4 Fatw►o -retain es to Grant St. O F-a Install a comport After Or Otter treatment to treat runoff at 27 240 N rd Reduces sldmwater pollutants Gnlaring WIWI Gent of 99W drains 91 acres T{pa stream 10 Fenno-Nor" Farm toTledernan Plant native vegetation in riparian eorkfor (20000 eq it) ARM nor" term maintenance praetk;GS Stabilize stream banks in arses of severe bca)Ized erosion 47 pp N Tigard (set non-ehuclutl programs) (200 tit) at the larm oig s Improves water qualty by shading, rieduel waskln 18 Fanno - Vita Brook Park Area Plant nwtvs vegetation in riparian corridor USA Not neovissavy N Po nescO a dl Club and Stabill2s stream red along 450 m of steam (1300 18 total 67 45 N THPRD BoAinane mann Pond are resolved reach F-21 Fantio - QNson Rd. Area Stabilize stream banks and bed In areas of localized erosion USA (approximately 10001R) 38 244 N Owners Difficult access SP-4 Ash - Confluarlas to 217 O A-1 s Install compost filter or other trstlntant with high flow at U- Store Reduces stOlRlwtler pollutants entering Store or near highway to pretreat stormwtler draining 145 28 307 N g 's stream acres A-9 Ash- Mall ONd. to w Plant native, vegattlion in riparian corridor Stabilize stream banks on kits with falling walk (commercial 49 140 N USA Difficult access ante nsidemia) mate 300 IA Olga Apartment complex flooding Ai Ash Riddle Fork - Park Place to C*darcnm Rd. Remove concrete spillway at the pond Restore natural stream Crop-section and wetlands for 10,000 USA Improves water quality by shading sq 1" 49 107 N Have OSL Imraclig is fill of forested Plant native vegetation In riparian corridor 00 wetland upstream of Park Place Remove nutne S/ Summer - Summer Lake Park Create additional islands In pond to Increase shade N"hbor cooperation needed Plant nainievogetation along pond (Create Irregular edge) After ma)ntartarics and landscape practices 230,000 sq R. 354 y Tigard (see non-structural program) Remove / control non-ntlive plants and animals (waterfowl & 54 olg`s Benefits positive iv0k br temperature, nutria) 00, bacteria, algae, bacteria, total Add habitat structure (snaas. basket s debris NNOUS and Other mArlenf removal 3 s Summer IlAlddle Fork - The Lake* Plant native vegetation Wong take edges (40.000 so it) Regrado to create wetland bench In pond (40,000 aq ft) Bvtn Improves wmor quaity by shading and 29 Remove! control non.natNe plant and animal populations 148 N Owners reducing nutrient loading from animal faces wstGrbwt 6 nutria) o1g.8 181 Vermont - CoMfuerree to CourAy LW* Plant natters vegoallon In Corridor (apprcx 37,000 sq R) 49 137 N t~A Improves wafer quality by shading, abilize stream bed to roduCe dOwnCuni x 450 IR 's kit treat Coat 2114 rod I A oatmate 2.2 million • Load responsibility in bold. USA a Unified Sewerage Agency; TNPRD , TuailLn Mule Park and Recremion District; pleb a other local govmmments Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 72 Project Fanno Creek Drive Bank Stabilization (F-4) Location Fanno Creek - off SW Char Drive near Fanno Creek Drive Problem Significant bank erosion along 150 feet of bank, 20-30 feet high Est. Cost $100,000 Partners Tigard, other local governments as appropriate Conceptual Design Solution Stabilize approximately 150 linear feet of streambank, using a combination of bioengineering techniques. Stabilize the toe of the slope with rock, embedded beneath the stream bed. Use high-strength coir fabric for added stability on open soil areas across the bank. Create a stable riffle in the channel bed along part of the reach, per geomorphologist's recommendations. Remove non-native species (blackberry and others) on the project site and across the stream on the floodpWn. Grade streambank on opposite side to encourage flow on to the floodplain. Re-establish native trees, shrubs, and grasses as specified. See conceptual map on back 2040 Flows Design Flow Node Points Drainage Area (Sq Mi) 2-yr 10-yr 25-yr 100-yr &FL5NE 27.62 1486 2226 2296 3098 &FL5S 28.00 1504 2255 2629 3144 Plant Community Riparian forest along bank Forested wetland and shrub/scrub wetland on floodpWn See Technical Appendix A for more specific flow information, and "Model Sites and Enhancement Vision" earlier in this section for specific plant community suggestions. Issues In-stream work will need to be completed between June I and September 30. A joint fill/removal permit from the Division of State Lands and a Tigard land use permit may be required. The project will probably be permitted under the enhancement provisions of the fill/removal permit. Appropriate erosion control should be provided Maintenance Site maintenance will be required until the native vegetation becomes established (3-5 years). Periodic summer watering, plant protection, and monitoring of the site conditions will be a critical aspect of the project. Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 73 Fenno Creek Drive Bank Stabilization (F-4) F Fanno a I Cr J Fanno I Cr _ a W m F-4 17- a cc r ONITA ' t STABILIZE ( \ ERODING ( i I \ BANK / LOWER FLOODPLAIN I ELEVATION / I ENHANCE ( FLOODPLAIN,,, IN PA 74 Section V Fenno Creek Watershed Management Plan Project Woodard Park Enhancement (F-9) Location Fanno Creek - Woodard Park in Tigard Problem Exposed sewer line in two places. Lack of native vegetation along the stream banks. Est. Cost $180,000 ($60,000 from a surface water management fund, $120,000 from sanitary sewer fund) Partners Tigard (SWM), USA (Sanitary), Tigard Industrial Park Conceptual Design Solution Cover sewer litres by encasing exposed locations in concrete and rock to create a riffle on both Fanno and Decry Dell Creek (see cross-section). Grade back disturbed streambanks and adjust the floodplain to accommodate the backwater from the created riffles. Remove non-native vegetation along both banks. Plant native vegetation throughout the park, focusing primarily along the stream edge. Grade a long shallow bioswale along the edge of the Tigard Industrial Park parking lot, parallel to the creek Vegetate with native grasses. Avoid impacting wet meadow on floodplain during construction. See conceptual map on back. 2040 Flows Design Flow Node Points Drainage Area (Sq Mi) 2-yr 10-yr 25-yr 100-yr &FLDD 24.32 1549 2329 2726 3276 &FL9N 24.58 1396 2115 2470 2955 Plant Community Riparian forest along banks Forested wetland in park Wet meadow downstream of park on floodplain See Technical Appendix A for more specific flow information, and "Model Sites and Enhancement Vision" earlier in this section for specific plant community suggestions. Issues In-stream work will need to be completed between June I and September 30. A joint fill/removal permit and Tigard land use permit will be required. It will be necessary to work closely with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife regarding fish passage. Appropriate erosion control should be provided Five homes in this area were flooded in February and November 1996. The project, along with the replacement of the Grant Street bridge should alleviate some of the flooding. Maintenance Site maintenance will be required until the native vegetation becomes established (3-5 years). Periodic summer watering, plant protection, and monitoring of the site conditions will be a critical aspect of the project. Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 75 Woodard Park Enhancement (P-9) TOP OF BANK _ WATER LEVEL ENCASE PIPE IN `CONCRETE / ROCK CREEK BED ~ ~ M ATH~AIL,~ jT PIPE F- 9 T SECTION A-A Fonno TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK WATER LEVEL ENCASE PIPE IN • ~e° CONCRETE / ROCK fl«,Y oWI PIPE Cr _ SECTION B-B' Selected areas of the floodplain must be lowered to compensate for aising the stream bed to cover the exposed sewer pipe (to be determined in the field). 1150-l u u ~ COVER EXPOSED JL~J SEWER LINES \ _ ~ n r~~gRO /ND / 'B \ R PDARIAN Q pgRk STRlgC VEGETATION ENHANCE tA' ADD BIO-SWALE FORESTED ^j WETLAND I0 PROTECT Ck WET MEADOW a r / COVER EXPOSED SEWER LINE iJ d o } ~ 0 FFT V G~ Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 76 Project Englewood Park Enhancement (F-12) Location Fanno Creek - Englewood Park just south of Scholls Ferry Road in Tigard Problem Open floodplain, unshaded straightened creek, deeply incised stream channel Est. Cost $2,349,000 Partners Tigard, other local governments as appropriate Conceptual Design Solution This is a regional water quality facility site (approximately 715,000 square feet in size) downstream of major commercial and residential development. Re-establish the frequency of stream/floodplain interaction by sloping and stabilizing approximately 3,800 linear feet of streambanks with bioengineering, as shown in cross- section. Add channel meanders in areas that have been straightened and add vegetation to shade the creek 1 throughout the site. Remove non-native vegetation in work areas before planting native forest wetlands and shrub/scrub wetlands on the site. Enhance the existing pond across from Nimbus development by minor regrading and planting with native plants. This project should be phased and constructed over 5-7 years. See conceptual map on back. The project construction costs could be funded from DSL's "in-lieu-of-mitigation" fund collected from property owners who were allowed to fill wetlands without having to build mitigation wetlands. 2040 Flows Design Flow Node Points Drainage Area (Sq Mi) 2-yr 10-yr 25-yr 100-yr &FM3E 11.93 793 1185 1380 1639 &FMHN 12.70 791 1184 1375 1630 &FMAS 17.20 1037 1552 1808 2149 Plant Community Riparian forest, forested wetland, shrub/scrub wetland, emergent marsh wetland, and upland forest at various locations throughout the site, depending on topography See Technical Appendix A for more specific flow information, and "Model Sites and Enhancement Vision" earlier in this section for specific plant community suggestions. Issues In-stream work will need to be completed between June 1 and September 30 of each year. A joint fill/removal permit and a Tigard land use permit will be required. A design charette should be coordinated with the Division of State Lands, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Corps of Engineers, City of Tigard, City of Beaverton, adjacent office park, and other land owners to develop this project. If this site is developed as a wetland mitigation bank, funding from other agencies (DSL) may be provided for some of the construction and long-term maintenance and monitoring. Appropriate erosion control should be provided Maintenance Site maintenance and monitoring will be required until the native vegetation becomes established (at least 15 years from start to project completion). Periodic summer watering, plant protection, and monitoring of site conditions will be a critical aspect of the project.. Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 77 1 Englewood Park Enhancement (F-12) DOW Fanno Cr. % Washington S« ollf To i Square Rd y U i ;,(i Nimbus tiHWY W R~ RppO qJ, Aw CAveeode n ya •O•. r, ® F-r ~ _ Hiteon _ F no ENHANCE BUS L ~cT Ash Cr. \~\M MARSH NO • ' ' a ~ ~ I Grseeburg s e . +Rd a ADD CHANNEL ~ \ RESTORE HISTORIC MEANDER CHANNEL MEANDER 1 I ADD I I I RIPARIAN I I / VEGETATION I THROUGHOUT SITE I TO SHADE CREEK I \ ~ E PATHWAY N ENHANCE p~K SHRUB/SCRUB ~-~E WETLAND \ r✓RE NORTH DAKOTA Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 78 Mill 1111 Project Fanno Creek Floodplain Enhancement (F-14) Location Fanno Creek - Between Fanno Creek Park and Highway 217 1 Old Fanno Creek wastewater treatment plant site Problem Floodplain disconnected by a large berm south of Denny Road. Creek unshaded. Est. Cost $452,000 Partners Beaverton, USA (owner), THPRD Conceptual Design Solution Complete a site assessment to ensure no soils / hazardous materials problems exist. Solve any problems prior to project construction. if safe, remove the large berm south of Denny Road along the west side of the creek in order to open the floodpWn. Lower the floodplain elevation by 1-2 feet in order to increase floodplain function. Revegetate with native vegetation. Plant native vegetation along the riparian corridor in areas with lack of shade, up to Highway 217. See conceptual map on back. 2040 Flows Design Flow Node Points Drainage Area (Sq Mi) 2-yr 10-yr 25-yr 100-yr &FM5W 9.99 793 1182 1375 1632 &FM6 9.61 795 1177 1366 1621 Plant Community Riparian forest along creek Shrub / scrub wetland on floodplain See Technical Appendix A for more specific flow information, and "Model Sites and Enhancement Vision" earlier in this section for specific plant community suggestions. Issues The work should be completed when the site is relatively dry. A joint fill/removal permit may be required. The waste water treatment plant area needs a site assessment to ensure no hazardous material issues exist. Appropriate erosion control should be provided. Maintenance Site maintenance will be required until the native vegetation becomes established (3-5 years). Periodic summer watering, plant protection, and monitoring of the site conditions will be a critical aspect of the project. 99 Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 79 Fanno Creek Floodplain Enhancement (F-14) HWY 217N; j ny Rd IS s OPEN y etleire` WATER J Rva - Crek GAS \\t Creek e . j • • HWY 217T FACILITY 1 t - Hell Blvd I ADD RIPARIAN VEGETATION STORAGE FACILITY SUB- STATION DENNY ROAD 77 I ~ r ~ I ~ ENHANCE AS ~ - I FORESTED WETLAND) AND ! rf111 t HRUB/SCRue WETLAND LOWER FLOODPLA N 1.-.2' ! tl 1 MERCER INDUSTRIES REMOVE .BERM---- ENHANCE [ J FOREST t ~ Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 80 Project Rambler/ Bohmann Pond and Stream Enhancement (F-17) Location Fanno Creek - Between Rambler and Bohmann Parkway Problem Creek straightened and unshaded. Excessive sedimentation in pond created by in-stream dam and upstream sediment sources. Flooding of homes along creek. Est. Cost $509,000 Partners USA, Neighborhood Association Conceptual Desirn Solution Re-establish creek channel and make the pond off-line (model project). Excavate excess sediment buildup in stream. Restore low-flow channel to historic meanders still present. Remove the south weir, re-configure the north weir (which has a fish ladder), and extend the island in order to make the pond off-line. Enhance the site with native riparian and emergent wetland vegetation. Residents who are floodprone have been advised to flood-proof their homes. See conceptual map on back 2040 Flows Design Flow Node Points Drainage Area (Sq NE) 2-yr 10-yr 25-yr 100-yr &FMA 8.62 875 1290 1497 1773 &FMBS 8.62 897 1338 1551 1835 &FMB 8.37 839 1326 1537 1818 FMBS .099 20 30 34 40 Plant Community Riparian forest along creek Emergent marsh and open water in off-line pond See Technical Appendix A for more specific flow information, and "Model Sites and Enhancement Vision" earlier in this section for specific plant community suggestions. Issues This project focuses on water quality enhancement and will not fully address flooding problems in the area. However, the project may help reduce the frequency and severity of flooding. The work should be completed between June 1 and September 30. A joint fill/removal permit will be required. The project must be coordinated with Division of State Lands, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and neighborhood association. USA must receive an easement over the pond and a permanent access point for maintenance purposes. The Fanno Creek Neighborhood Association must contribute partial funding to the project. Maintenance Site Maintenance will be required until the native vegetation becomes established (3-5 years). Periodic summer watering, plant protection, and monitoring of the site conditions will be a critical aspect of the project. Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 81 Rambler ! Sohmann pond and Stream Enhancement t 1 S,d,ae F*+Y 5 kri Rd rrtk J a i V < 07. o F-Y = = t a ac _ x Sd+ Rd i . - I t~ anno G rl ~4 4w r~z q tiERG ' pGC _ SST C_ MICR L~ h /~,G t 4 1. A•• EXISTING WEIR INE POND KEEP MAINTAIN OFF L \ TO EXCAVATE EXCESS \ SEDIMENT FROM EXTEND EXISTING \ SELECTED LOCATIONS ISLAM \ Q 9 REMOVE \ \ J o~~'qN THIS WEIR PARK ENHANCE OND/MARSH \ ..EXIST / P }1 ISLANDS ROB ORES FLOW LJ Q L OW RAMBLER LANE sa V Section Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Project Oregon Episcopal School (OES) / Radio Tower Site (F-20) Location Fanno Creek - between Nicol and Oleson Roads Problem Creek channel deeply incised. Floodplain disconnected, reducing flood storage capacity Est. Cost $1,609,000 Partners Portland's Bureau of Environmental Services (BES), USA Conceptual Design Solution Increase the floodplain function by lowering the elevation of the streambank and some marsh areas to allow overland flow at both the marsh and the radio tower site during a 1.5-year storm and greater. Add in-stream structure, including large woody debris and rock riffles, to raise the streambed along 2,200 linear feet of the reach, per specification of a geomorphologist and water resource engineer. Repair eroding streambanks as needed. Plant native vegetation throughout disturbed portions of the site. Evaluate the function of the beaver dam at the OES marsh and re-configure outlet to prevent marsh overflow across Nicol Road. See conceptual map on back. 2040 Flows Design Flow Node Points Drainage Area (Sq Mi) 2-yr 10-yr 25-yr 100-yr &FMD 6.68 808 1208 1400 1653 &FME 5.19 715 1056 1219 1433 &FMVT 6.42 877 1301 1505 1775 VTl 1.24 197 289 332 390 Plant Community Riparian forest along creek Shrub/scrub wetland and forested wetland on Foodplain See Technical Appendix A for more specific flow information, and "Model Sites and Enhancement Vision" earlier in this section for specific plant community suggestions. Issues The work should be completed between June 1 and September 30. A joint fill/removal permit will be required The project should be coordinated with BES, Division of State Lands, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Oregon Episcopal School. Appropriate ercrion control should be provided Maintenance Site maintenance will be required until the native vegetation becomes established (3-5 years). Periodic summer watering, plant protection, and monitoring of the site conditions will be a critical aspect of the project. Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 83 Oregon Episcopal School (OES) / Radio Tower Site (F-20) «cs.•rt Nicol Rd i `°rmon - o0 Fonn Cr j . ..Pr.y JMf ° rlwoods Cr * LOWER & STABILIZE Y STREAMBANK * ENCOURAGE FLOODING OF FLOODPLAIN LJ U * ADD IN-STREAM HABITAT d dQ OES MARSH G~ ~v [1] (OPEN WATER) m RPCTTONFIGURE / ENHANC~ j/ A j~ OUTN~CO ~RpEDUCEA~ FLO DIN f- ~J KEEP SHRUB/ PRO VECT SCRUB ` BOUNDARY II / _ \ WETLAND o i * LOWER STREAMBANK ENCOURAGE FLOW THROUGH MARSH AREA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL * ADD IN-STREAM HABITAT OES SCHOOL Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 84 ' Project Raleighwood Park / Bancroft Pond (SV-1) Location Sylvan Creek - Raleighwood Park Problem Homes on the floodplain subject to flooding. Accumulation of sediment in the marsh and Bancroft Pond. Erosion of temporary weir structure. Est. Cost $350,000 Partners USA, Property owners, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODO'I), Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District (THPRD) Conceptual Design Solution Purchase floodprone property at fair market value, if available and remove structure to increase the size of sediment trapping pond that reduces sediment accumulation in the marsh. Determine the geomorphically stable condition for the channel, move the pond off-line with a new control structure, and remove the existing in-stream concrete weir that makes the pond. Dredge the off-line Bancroft Pond as needed, to capture sediment before it enters the marsh. OR Dredge a stream channel through the marsh to encourage conveyance and move water away from homes. In both cases, allow ecological succession to occur in the marsh following any construction activity (allow beaver to influence the site conditions). See conceptual map on back. 2040 Flows Design Flow Node Points Drainage Area (Sq Mi) 2-yr 10-yr 25-yr 100-yr &SV 1 1.20 196 288 331 389 &SV2 .95 152 225 259 305 Plant Community Riparian forest along creek Shrub/scrub wetland, emergent marsh wetland, and forested wetland on floodplain See Technical Appendix A for more specific flow information, and "Model Sites and Enhancement Vision" earlier in this section for specific plant community suggestions. Issues The work should be completed between June 1 and September 30 to accommodate the in-stream work period set by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Appropriate erosion control should be provided One house in the area floods, several others have had significant amounts of water in their crawl spaces and base:*_-ent . Maintenance The changes in the marsh system over time should be monitored to evaluate ecological response to lack of human intervention (non-maintenance). The off-line pond should be checked periodically for excess sediment accumulation. 85 Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V Releighwood Park i Bancroft Pond (SV-1) 11 *bt- S, ANC f w. c .l Mn .mac: per: Scholls ntvK . 2 n,t - Rd~y Tai. MAWLTCH z. f ] _ T % € . BERM OR a S,tv.n ISLAND Cr Fcnno Cr LOW ' FLOW Id / CHANNEL av. Mills. Hwy III ~ dsson - r 1 HIGH FLOW OPTION B: OVERFLOW DREDGE STREAMNNEL y~,~ of THROUGH MARS & \ S KEEP SMALLER OFF-LI E p~~ tt G~~P4 POND CONCEPT ADD IPARIAN VEGETATION Qi~o4_1 REMOVE P~ 0 /ZO7 EXISIAJG -WEIR Q AD~ SMALL WEIRS i l l OPTION A: ' ACQUIRE PROPERTY & REMOVE STRUCTURE TO INCREASE SIZE OF Q OFF-LINE POND ti I TO RALIEGHWOOD MARSH Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 86 Project Railroad to Highway 217 Stream Enhancement (RR-1) Location Red Rock Creek - from railroad near confluence up to Highway 217 Problem Lack of shade along a straightened channel in a commercial / industrial area Est. Cost $220,000 Partners Tigard, other local governnents as appropriate Conceptual Design Solution Re-establish riparian corridor through minor creek channel alterations (increase channel complexity by adding rock riffles and large woody debris). Remove invasive non-native species and re-establish a diversity of native vegetation throughout 10,000 sq ft of corridor from Hwy 217 to Huntziger. Enlarge existing wetland features to over 70,000 sq ft (at emergent marsh and wet meadow locations in vacant field off of :`.'all St) to increase water quality treatment. Revegetate the triangle pond to increase shade, and implement a nutria management program for the pond. See conceptual map on back. 2040 Flows Design Flow Node Points Drainage Area (Sq Mi) 2-yr 10-yr 25-yr 100-yr &RR2 1.39 276 394 449 523 &RR3 1.21 241 344 392 457 Plant Community Riparian forest along creek Emergent marsh and wet meadow on floodplain at selected locations See Technical Appendix A for more specific flow information, and "Model Sites and Enhancement Vision" earlier in this section for specific plant community suggestions. Issues The work should be completed between June 1 and September 30. Upstream conditions should be monitored to avoid impacts to the enhancement project downstream. Appropriate erosion control should be provided Portions of this project area are an existing mitigation site. Maintenance Site maintenance will be required until the native vegetation becomes established (3-5 years). Periodic summer watering, plant protection, and monitoring of the site conditions will be a critical aspect of the project. Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 87 Railroad to Highway 217 Stream Enhancement (RR-1) HWY w 2 - artmouth ENHANCE ` st TRIANGLE ~ i_ 72nd OND / OFF-LINES l t Avo - ( r Hall t~rtmou(h! !Blvd J PROTECT / ENHANCE WET MEADOW P Frav[s. „ 4. RR-1 t ' HWf,21 7 72nd ADD Nunziksr Ave : RIPARIAN st 1 VEGETATION Red Rock s~ 1 J L Fanno Cr r► f ~ 111 ADD RIPARIAN / Q / VEGETATION ENHANCE HRUB/SCRUB & EMERGENT MARSH ADD RIPARIAN OPEN FIELD VEGETATION Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 88 Project Washington Square Pretreatment (SP-3) Location Ash Creek at location A-1 - between Toys R Us and LP Gas Problem No pretreatment of runoff from Washington Square Mall Est. Cost $93,000 Partners Tigard Conceptual Design Solution Install a stormwater pretreatment facility that will physically and biochemically remove hydrocarbons, metals, and nutrients from the runoff draining Washington Square. Construct a high-flow bypass to prevent scour of the system during major events. See conceptual map on back 2040 Flows Design Flow Node Point Drainage Area (Sq Mi) 2-yr 10-yr 25-yr 100-yr AS 1 N .226 51 71 81 94 Plant Community Upland forest plantings in parking area near facility to shade parking lot and swale See Technical Appendix A for more specific flow information, and "Model Sites and Enhancement Vision" earlier in this section for specific plant community suggestions. Issues Easements over the facility location must be obtained. Maintenance Monitoring and maintenance of this facility is critical to documenting its effectiveness. Inflow and outflow water samples after the facility is installed, as well as physical material samples, will need to be taken. Periodic removal of the physical media will need to occur. Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 89 Washington Square Pretreatment (SP-3) 1 I rma i . f' Washington DRAINAGE FROM hate' squor. INSTALL LOW/MODERATE FLOW WASHINGTON SQUARE Rd TU PRETREATMENT FACILITY i~ Nimbus s HWY 217 NEXT TO EXISTING SWALE Aw. / 'r I CaeCOd~` `y. / Ave *on M TOYS \ Fno' i J ,tc C. ~r v Cr." R Ash US \ a Crow drq n wa 'orthPoko 0 j~ •'•y4.r \ \ / E P PES FLOW ADD P PR~\NG / TREES PASS HIGH P PR~\NG { FLOWS / Ff IN EXISTING / ~:,A \ DRAINAGE SWALE./ / O y \ LP GAS TREATMENT FACILITY HIGH FLOW CROSS SECTION A-A' Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 96 Project Ball Creek Enhancement (B-1) Location Ball Creek from its confluence to Interstate 5 Problem Lack of shade., potential spill locations Est. Cost $34,000 Partners Tigard, ODOT, owner, other local governments as appropriate Conceptual Design Solution Work with neighboring industries to educate them about spill prevention and gain access to the creek for planting. Remove invasive non-native species and garbage. Revegetate the banks with native vegetation. In areas prone to spilling, develop strategies to protect the creek from spills. Work with Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) on the I-5 / Hwy 217 right-of-way to implement a planting project and modify maintenance practices. See conceptual map on back. 2040 Flows Design Flow Node Points Drainage Area (Sq Mi) 2-yr 10-yr 25-yr 100-yr &BL2E 2.17 394 569 651 761 &BL2 1.42 245 355 405 476 &BL1 2.38 437 629 720 841 Plant Community Riparian forest along creek See Technical Appendix A for more specific flow information, and "Model Sites and Enhancement Vision" earlier in this section for specific plant community suggestions. Issues Streamside owner cooperation is critical to the success of project implementation. ODOT is designing a clover-leaf transportation exchange for Interstate 5 and Highway 217. Appropriate erosion control should be provided. Maintenance Site maintenance will be required until the native vegetation becomes established (3-5 years). Periodic summer watering, plant protection, and monitoring of the site conditions will be a critical aspect of the project. Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 91 Bail Creek Enhancement (B-1) ?t CFF~gMP ADD RIPARIAN VEGETATION . HWY 217•., I I • 1 , INDUSTRIAL BUILDING I ADD FENCE PROTECT!0N 1-5 i 72nd - II Ave I i to Bonito Rd ewrA B- I-5 , Ball Cr TIGAR0 Fwn 3 BONITA ROAD tPl . REMOVE BLACKBERRY ADD RIPARIAN VEGETATION Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 92 DOE Structural Projects: Community-Based Enhancement Community-based enhancement projects are critical to the long-term success of re-establishing healthy streams and wetlands throughout the watershed. No single agency, group, or city will be able to achieve the goals of this plan. However, the cumulative benefits of many projects - park plantings, back-yard naturescaping, storm drain stenciling, and recycling of oil, paint and other chemicals - will go a long way toward improving water quality. Table 19 lists projects that can be completed by community groups, property owners, and individuals. Figure 17 identifies the project locations. The main problem with most of the sites is the invasion of non-native vegetative species and the lack of shade along creek banks. These projects do not require extensive construction and can easily be phased over several years. Table 19 identifies physical habitat types for each enhancement project. These correspond to the physical habitat types shown on Figure 14 and presented on the detail sheets provided earlier in this section. The detail sheets give information about the hydrology, geomorphology, and plant community of each habitat type, indicating what the enhancement project should look like in the long term. Table 18 also gives model site numbers, which correspond to the model sites identified in Table 16 and Figure 13. The model sites are specific locations in the field where elements of a healthy stream system, appropriate to the enhancement project, can be observed. Ter•hnical Assistance for Community Enhancement Projects Technical assistance for community -based enhancement projects is available through USA. Brochures and handbooks are also available to help groups develop a project that meets their objectives and budget. The following outline identifies the important tasks and questions that need to be considered when embarking on an enhancement project. Please contact USA and cities or county before beginning any project along a stream or wetland. 1. Identify who wants to do a project and why e What are the objectives or goals of the project? • How many people will be involved? S What are the participants' ages and abilities? o How long will the participants be willing to work on the project? A day? A few weekends? i Does the designated leader have experience coordinating this kind of project? If not, contact USA. 2. Identify a project location and visit the site to confirm its condition (See Tables 19,1713, 17C, and Figure 17 for projects and locations. Contact USA for more information) • Obtain permission from the landowner to visit the site. If the site is in a park, notify city or park district staff of your interest in an enhancement project. o Is the site accessible for the participants? o What are the critical ecological needs of the project? Non-native species removal? Revegetation? a What are the human needs of the project? Public education? Localized creek access and viewing? ® Are the storm drains in the area of the project stenciled with the message: "Dump no waste, drains to stream"? ® Are any projects planned or occurring up or downstream that could affect the project? o Can the site be easily maintained and watered in the short term (in the case of planting)? e What are the land owners' issues or concerns? ® Are there opportunities to get others in the area involved? Fauna Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 97 3. Formulate a project task list and develop a conceptual plan • How large an area can the project cover, given the number of participants and their ages? • When will the project occur? What will the weather and planting conditions be? • What materials are required? Size, type, and amount of plants, plant protection (netting, fencing), compost, mulch, rock, large woody debris? Public education materials, storm drain stencils, paint, building materials? • How much will the project cost, based on the plan developed? How will it be funded? • Are permits needed for any of the project tasks? Contact USA for assistance. • What tools will be needed to complete the project? Where will those tools come from? 4. Plan the details of the project • Who will prepare the site? How will unwanted materials be removed form the site? • Who will order the project materials? When and from where? How and where will they be delivered? • How will participants be informed of the project and by whom? Newspaper? Monthly meeting? Phone calls? • Who will coordinate the participants during the project? Who will bring the water and snacks? • How will the project tasks be completed by the participants, as planned by the lead^r? • Who will monitor and maintain the project? How? USA, the local city, or park district may be able to assist with finding grant funding, debris hauling, etc. 5. Install the project Use the following guidelines (assuming fair weather and moderate motivation levels): Planting rates (includes getting plants in place, composting, mulching, tagging, fencing, and staking) • Children under 12: 1-2 plant per hour up to 2 hours • Teens age 13-17: 2-3 plants per hour up to 3 hours • Adults: 3-4 plants per hour up to 4 hours Blackberry removal and root grubbing by hand • Children under 12: not recommended • Teens age 13-17: 3- 4 square feet per hour up to 4 hours • Adults: 4-5 square f~-,et per hour up to 3 hours Cost of hired labor to remove blackberry / plant (per day) • Service / youth crews - 8 people: approx. $300 - $400 / day • Landscape contractor - 5 people: approx. $450 - $500 / day Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 98 ERE= Some Rules of Thumb Regarding Enhancement • Know your site, in all its seasons • Ask permission early on if it is not your property • inform appropriate parties of your intentions (regulators, surrounding homeowners, etc.) • Evaluate everything - water movement, soil conditions, plant species, sunlight, nutrients, access, etc. • Ask for help from a qualified professional when you are in over your head • Maximize opportunities and resolve constraints before you develop the plan • Submit permit applications to appropriate agencies several months before project installation • Recognize that those who live at your site may change it to suit their needs (beaver, deer, nutria, raccoons, birds, people). Plan for both protection and selective thinning by others. • Never disturb a site more than is absolutely necessary • Prepare the site from the top down; plant the site from the bottom up • Do not underestimate the power of nature to take your project downstream • A failed monitoring effort typically leads to a failed project • You will typically complete half of what you thought you could get done in a given time. Be patient. Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 99 Table 19 Community-Based Enhancement Projects III I P stllam Roach Detalle Also site Tables to, 170, 17C and f urea 13. 14. 17) PsnnO Creak I-Sh-do croak and atabikza banks from the Ball Creak ooMlusnoe south F• Famet 911 141h 1 t N Y RF 1 to forested area. Identified to a moderate priority structural project. Shade creek both adaa. Blabilwze banks with broongrtaering as IF-3 Now derehownfin red n 2400 420,WQ Y Y rrr RF Ms d. ds, access. Shade creek and stabilize bank in area of reeklontrl and farm F.6 led Rwif n1 N V mod RF 1 Oh M. Shade creek on both banks tnmughoul the Park 8tabikze banks in F•7 Togard CRY Park A Y V RF F 11.16 at z2g fore. F Man I" to r at 1 200 1 2.000 N Y mod RF 11 Sh a creek north of Ciao A. Morfan F-11 T n N. Dekoll t. 3000 1 000 Y &N N Y /mar RFILF t1 Shad* crook Mr h. F•1 n Inn 4 4 N RF/FW Shade 3.20 crook both banks on a rota of H 17. Ash Creak A-1 Coriffirlinvill H 17 100 36000 1 N Y RF 1 haN along rkw are" t am d reuroed bra . She" creek at Progress Downs and anhan0e wet mredow located A-4 West Fork of Ash 1000 50000 1 N F WM 1 hale way down reach. Stabdue creek and sheds, croak at Park Place Apartments. Nephbwt,*W nvohemranl needed. Listed as a low priority A•6 Pork PI Avis 00 10.000 N V FIN 7 atruotuta Shah cask on both benks throughout reach. Aka him so farm A• CqdOMMI 19-Tayipes Fe 2400 1 000 N Y minor FIF/FW F 1.7.0 dross t0 fact streambsnk. Enharoe vegetative dive" (shrubs and understory). Private property TayWs Ferry to Moonshadow Pk 2600 66000 N N Participation needed. Potential model ode ad Moorohadow with A•7 M w Part 3200 0000 Y V RF/FW/HF 7 onned 1997 nhanoameM Protect RF/FW/H Enhance vOgat81 tlrvs,rsity, tshrubs and wide rnoy). Private property reds ton nestled. A• W F • Conflytince to County LinL_ 4800 96000 N Y minor F 2.7 .9 Increase vogstall" divers" ai upland elope and in drairogoway. Evaluate possibility of adding addroonal boukers and debris to A• Owainace from Armo 00 10.000 l1 Y HF 1 atabit a casoed water. summa creak RF/S S! Aker school mairdsnaroe predcas (debris dumping). Enhance 1 F ""r M N hoof tot 1 %i 600 50000 v 3 N Y mar RFI U 7 I1 1 tans, drversirty from u frsam •a of school property to 121st. Enhance vapetatns, diversify in pocket parks (Jack Park) and ponds. K r 11 n I H wat104 Y 8 N Y RF/SS 1 1 Shad* creek as needed alond reach. Protect lower non of reach. Re-establish / Shade riparian condor with pockets of open water and shrub/scrub wetlands. Eatabirsh conservation easernent over sat for 1 I O U r aka Park 5000 125U00 Y&N Y rrw O S F/EM iiA320 tong term protection. RFS ==1000 h upstream of Scholls Fart' Rd and 2000 ft Re~atabksh vegMatrvs diversity throughout reach south of Satolls S6 P Creak Araa 1600 Y N FWIUF % 7 Far Rd te"of development is complete. 1 n to 044 Son IN Ferry goad 0100.0DOI N Y mod 3 / 11 13 pia-establish vegetative dnarbry throughout reach after dwobpneM is compete. Protect valley Slopes between Weir and Seard Rd from S•7 North Fork - 0 ollt For to H4!LrI_ 6800 Y&N Y Trod HF 119 development i ds Enhance vsgol*live diversity from natural pond to the southwest, up to Muffev, Hil aka to Mrs S. For 4000 N Y mod MMF 4 6 9 tM wMrno rk at the t of the drains o. Shads creek on both banks throughout reach from beaver pond )cast S 1 h F von 1 dw rlers 10000 N Y minor HFAJF 2.1 0.14 north d the quarry, u to the headwaters. 5-2 P n 122nd red 123rd n nb 1000 1 10.000 N N M 20 Work with home owners to Shade pond. Woods Creak Enharoa vepatetwe diversify throughout reach. Shade crook on both W P R Fr n N V rninor SMF 11 1 banks. W A n e 1 1 N Y rids r W 14 Remo+e rrK lea ivy from trees. Program Crest P-1 orifl Pr Downs Y l1 N Y m vnoi RF 1 0 LMs Bel Aire Creak Enhance vegetative dnsrsrty throughout reach. Easy access alorig A• 1 Somfivio An I H rd Park 4000 4 Y V mod 1 bred M uccor-mool *90- on of the crSOIL Nfleon Crook Enhance vegatatare divenry horoughout roach. Shedd creak on both H-1 Enaqw-ood ark West 3000 1300,OQQ Y Y mod RF S 11 banks from Adis F Rd south to Hari Pond. Deny Dell Crook Enhance vpattime divinity throughout ream. Shedd creek whore PQ: 1 P r l Walnut St. 1 N M I riipisda& Enhanoe veg"rve d w cry throughout reach. Shade creek where Walnut 0 H90wolers 4"000 V Y mod RFMF nooded. Easy I Skim r Mime, fanno Trlb darles cqftf~d" 10 04F V" 61 4400 1320M N Y h crook h aid" n• n apartment cqrrkolox. conflAnoo to R 1. N HF 1 n divisrsitif between Reibria and Fhnotnook Red Rook Creak She" c?eok and enhance vog"rve diversify throughout reach north at Darl,oMn. Could be ennanad Ilvough the davabom ent proven. H 21? to 1-6 1 V F 1T P welend near t Ner, own." vgta rr+a uarlwen Qrrewm Nr ro.s r . p brew, r eawrr. s arilwl. rl.le ram Ms rarows we sees YI se (to* M P%VNO resat I e* M~antla IOe asrara N lrwe. wbfi r lent Ilaalla, d.wewt ruler wwo. Fr ~M bal. W.O.Om w bal. lfea/Y a-0 err err awrr• ISM M orb sesorr. Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 100 .aMwe,« to ii. a / ar Bey!! r f ION r J rT` I 7- Upper Fenno ti Pendleton t e 1 r• Vermont % 13' R ; Woods • 60-1 Middle Fenno 1 A S A- A S- 9 A-9. A-1 iteon Red Rods Summer _I' -6 1 ...i-. " 1 2 , D_ R I, J F- - , - Boll Kreuqw De'rr'y Dell Lower Fenno: ed■,.■.r MF- 1 J F- I Tualatin River , i I Figure 17 Community-Based Enhancement Project Locations Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan Section V 101 V ISM ~~cs Cc ~R J-D laq ) ct(z February 23, 1998 To: City Council Members From: Darlene Wozrriak 14200 SW Fern St. Tigard OR 97223 On Wednesday, February 18, 1998, we attended an informational meeting on preliminary plans to expand Act III Theatres Tigard Cinemas, adding 6 screens and a parking lot south of McDonalds on 72nd Ave. Upon thinking the project through the next few days, I wondered what had happened to the backage road required for connectivity by the Triangle street plan. Upon talking to Mark Roberts on February 23rd, I learned that the road would not be required of Act 1B. I was very surprised as this seems to be a good opportunity to get the connectivity that the Triangle needs. I was also told by Mr. Roberts that if an appeal was made regarding this backage road, that it would be denied. I had understood that the backage road was going to be required of Cub Foods when they develop their land alongside the theatre and Dartmouth. Will Act III be required at that time to complete the backage road to 72nd? If not, why the disparity between the requirements for one developer and not the other in the same area? / W ~Y " C - 4 ~ b • NO moo' o • o ,air t a o L• ~ ~ eta Gub n s ~p nC Q '-7~ji QCf ODONNELL RHMIS ET RL 503-243-2944 Feb 23.96 15:31 No.U10 P.U1 O'DONNELL RHMIS CREW CORRIGAN & BACHRACH A77ORNEYS AT LAW 1727.14.W. Hoyt Scrett Portland, Oregon 97209 TCI.P.PHONBc (503) 222.4402 PAX: (503) 243-2944 M WO UnY TO FOMAND 0I/SCR FACSIMILE TRAMMISSION COVER SHEET THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONSIST OPATTORNEY PRWILEOEDAND CONFIDENTIAL. INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE. OP TIIR INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED BEIAW. IF TH8 RRADER OF THIS MESSAGE 13 NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR TILE EMPLOYED 1R AGUN7 RESPONSIBLE TO DELIVER rr TO Tito INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HERROY NOTIFIED THAT ANY D198P.MINATION, DISTRIDUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR. PLEASE IMMVDIATELY NOTIFY US DY TELRPHONL AND RulliN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA TI1E U.S. POSTAL SERVICF. TI LANK YOU. DATE: February 23, 1998 CLIENT NO.: 90032.1 TO: William A. Monahan Wayne Lowry city or Tigard City of Tigard FAX 684-7297 684.7297 Phone 639.4171 639-4171 FROM: Charles E. Corrigan FAX # (503) 243-2944 DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED: Letter and enclosure re Tigard/Dartmouth LID. COMMENTS: 5 PAGES TO FOLLOW, EXCLUDING COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL THE UNDERSIGNED AT (503) 222.4402 IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU. SIGNED: Tana Canfield AN ORIGINAL IS BEING MAILED: AN ORIGINAL ISAVAILADLEUPONREQUEST: 0110NNELL RAMIS ET AL 503-243-2944 Feb 23.98 15:31 No.010 P.O. O' TJONNELL RAMIS CREW CORRIGAN & BACHRACH, LLP JEFF H. BACI IRACH ATTORNEYS AT LAW CLACKAMAS COUNTY OFFICE MARK L. BUSCII 1727 N.W. Hors $u= II I N. Giant, Suite 202 D. DANIEL CHANDLER Pord&M, Oro6on 97209 Canby. Oregon 97013 DOMINIC 0. COLEMA•• TELEPHONE: (503) 266.1149 CHARLES E. CORRIOAN• TELEPHONE: (SM) 2224402 STEPHEN F. CREW PAX: 003) 243-2944 MARTIN C. DOLAN VANCOUVER, WASIIINGTON OFFICE GARY F. FIRESTONC' First Independent Place WILLIAM E. GAAR PLBASS REPLY TO PORTLAND OFFICE j 1220 Main Streak Suite 451 0. FRANK HAMMOND• Vancouver, Washington 98660.2964 MALCOLM JOHNSON* TELEP110N13: (360) 699.7287 MARX P. ODONNELL FAX: (360) 699.7221 T. CHAD PLASTER *60 TIMOTHY V. RAMIS February 23, 1998 WILLIAM 1, STALNAKER JAMES M. COLEMAN ANDREW 11. STAMP SPECIAL COUNSTIL BARTON J. WACHSTBTER ALSO AD`I TEED TO PRACTICE IN WA5HTNOTON ALTO ADmn MD TO FMCTICH IN CALIFORNIA ADMITTED TO PRACIICS IN WASHINGION ONLY ALSO ADMMILD TO PRACTICE IN WASHINOTON AND MONTANA Y IA FAX AND FIMT CLASS AIL. Mr. Anthony 0. Righellis, P.E. Harper Righellis, Incorporated 5200 S.W. Macadam Avenue, Suite 580 Portland, Oregon 97201 Re: Tigard/Dartmouth LID Proposed Assessment Formula Dear Tony: In follow-up to my voice mail message of February 23rd, enclosed find City of Tigard's Ordinance No. 84.17. Section 5 lists the properties located within the LID boundary but exempted from the district. Wayne Lowry is out of the office this week, but I have asked his assistant, Cindy Turner to fax you the notice that Wayne sent out to the affected property owners last week. I assume we need to revise the proposed assessments of the property owners within the district to reflect the fact that certain other properties were not included. Your help in that effort would be appreciated. ODONNELL RHMIS ET RL 503-243-2944 Feb 23,98 15:32 No.010 P.03 O'DONNELL RAMIS CREW CORRIGAN & BACHRACH, LLP Mr. Anthony O. Righellis, P.E. February 23, 1998 Page 2 Please give me a call when you get a chance. Sinc yours, axles E. orrigan CEC/tjc Enclosure copy w/Enclosure: Mr. Wayne Lowry Mr. William Monahan CIDONNELL RAMIS ET AL 503-243-2944 Feb 23,9 15:32 No.010 F.GtI CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 84-L AN ORDINANCE CONFIRMING AND:RATIFYING THE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FEBRUARY 27, 1984, WITH RESPECT TO THE 'BOUNDARIES OF *THE DARTMOUTH STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID #40) ESTABLISHING THE DISTRICT; APPROVING, RATIFYING AND ADOPTING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE'S FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS; DECLARING RESULTS OF THE HEARING HELD WITH RESPECT TO THE IMPROVEMENT: AND DETERMINING THE BENEFITED PROPERTIES TOBE ASSESSED. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 84°14 was passed by the City Council of the City of Tigard at its regular meeting of February 27, 1984, which described the boundaries of a proposed street improvement assessment district, and which declared the Council's intention to construct a street, including curb, sidewalk, streetlights, traffic signal, storm sever, waterline, sanitary sever and appurtenances thereto, and to assess the costs for the improvements against the property within the boundaries which have been found to be specially benefited; and WHEREAS.-pursuant to the revolution, legal notice of the hearing scheduled for March 12, 1984 was given by publication in the Tigard Times for consecutive publishinge on March 1 and 8, 1984, prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, by the terms of the resolution a hearing was held in Fowler Junior High School at 10865 S.W. Walnut Street-in Tigard, Oregon on March 12, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. and was continued to March 26, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of affording an opportunity to any parties effected by the proposal to .make objections or remonstrances to the proposed improvements. The plans and specifications for the improvement and estimates of the work to be done and the probable costs of the improvement together with the percentage of the total cost of the improvement which each lot should pay were available to the public at the meeting and prior to the meeting; and WHEREAS, by the -terms of the resolution and published notice, written objections or remonstrances from not less than 66 2/3% of the owners of property within the boundaries of the area were invited as provided by TN.;C 13.04.050, and all objections and remonstrances presented prior to the hearing and at the hearing represent less than 66 2/3z of the owners of the property in the area within the improvement assessment district and that the percentage of remonstrances is not a ban to further proceedings in the making of the improvements; and WHEREAS, all proceedings to date have been in conformity with State Statute, the Tigard Charter, Chapter IX, 538, and Tigard Municipal Code, Title 13, and all procedures were regularly and lawfully conducted. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Resolution No. 84-14, adopted by cite City Council on February 27, 1984, and attached and marked as Exhibit "A" shall be adopted as a part of this ordinance subject to the amendments sac forth in Section 5 of this ordinance. Th" amendments a;: a result of the public hearing proceedingai and the amended resolution is hereby approved, ratified, and confirmed, and the boundaries of the area known as DARTMOUTH IlfPROVEMEHT DISTRICT as described In rho resolution, are declared and fixed in accordance with the description. 0110NNELL RAMI.S ET AL 503-243-2944 - - - Feb 23,98 15:33 No.010 P.05 Section 2: The City Council having acquired jurisdiction to order the improvement to be made, does hereby authorize. the formation of the local improvement district and directs the Finance Director to prepare the Preliminary Assessment Roll. Section 3: The City Council, further authorises the acquisition of lams as provided by State law and the~Tigard Municipal Code and the construction of a street improvement within: the boundaries of the DARTMOUTH IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT in conformity in all reasonable particulars with the plane and specifications adopted as part of Resolution No. 84-14 and hereby ratified and adopted by this ordinance. Section 4: The estimated coats and expenses of the improvement assessed against the specially benefited properties is $1,995,700.00. The estimated cost includes the cost of construction and installation of the improvements; advertising, legal, administrative, survey, engineering, notice, supervision, materials, labor, contracts, equipment, inspections and assessment costs; financing costs including interest charges; the costs of necessary ,property, right-of-way or easement acquisition and condemnation proceedings; attorney's fees and any other necessary expenses. Section 5: All lands rituated within the boundaries described on the attached Exhibit "A" are determined and declared to be a street improvement assessment district, and it is further declared that each lot, part of lot and parcel of land within said boundaries will be especially benefited by said improvements, and that the estimated cost is $1,995,700.00 for the improvements including land acquisition costs, the assessable cost are estimated to be $1,995.700.00 which shall be assessed in full, according to benefit against all lands within said improvement district. Benefit for the purposes of LID #40 is hereby determined to be derived according a property's ability to develop as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Tigard. Four properties in part or whole as provided below are excepted from the District and they are the Alexander property (Tax Map #IS1 36 CD Lot #1800 6 1900), the Hedgepeth/Stew.rt property (Tax Map S1 36 DC Lot 4402 and the Vasay property (Tax Map #2S1 IM Lot 42800 which are substantially developed and therefore receive no benefit, also the Probatfield property (Tax lisp # 1S1 36CD Lot #1700) EXCEPT the southerly 10,000 square feet which is substantially developed and therefore receives no benefit. Section 6: The Tigard City Council finds that the DARTMOUTH LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT improvements are of the character described in ORS 223.205, and that :hey therefore qualify for financing by general obligation improvement warrants pursuant to ORS 287.502 287.515. TiONNELL RHN S ET HL 503-243-2944 Feb 23,98 15:33 NIlia o,010 P.06 Section 7: nis ordinance &hall-be effective•oWand after the 30th day after its enactment by the City Council and approval by the Mayor. r PASSED: By 1-1MA ni Af&.S vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of An-j 1984- 67 Deputy City Recorder - City o Tigard APPROVED: 7h£s day of , 1984. Mayor pro tem - City 'of Tigard. AAS TO FOR2i: ity Attorney lV/1425A