City Council Packet - 06/24/1997TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF TIGARD
UQ OREGON /
MEETING
JUNE 24, 1997
COUNCIL MEETING WILL NOT BE
TELEVISED
i:~r„yo,.aa
? 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
i
r
i
I
I
■
I
a ,
i
a
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
BUSINESS` MEETING
JUNE 24,1997 6:30 PM
TIGARD CITY HALL
13125 5W HALL BLVD
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
a
PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the
appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the
Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be
two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting
either the Mayor or the City Administrator.
Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying
be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda i
items can be heard in any order after 7.30 p.m.
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and I~
should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the
Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD -
Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing
® impairments; and
• Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is
important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your
need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone
numbers as listed above: 639-4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD -
Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 1
1111111
.3
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 24, 1997
i
1 6:30 P.M.
• STUDY MEETING
> Agenda Review
> The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session under the
provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), e; (h) to discuss labor
relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation
issues. All discussions within this session are confidential, therefore,
nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those uresent.
Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session,
but must not disclose any information discussed during this session.
7:30 P.M.
1. BUSINESS MEETING
1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
7:35 P.M.
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please)
7:45 P.M.
3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
1 3.1 Approve City Council Minutes - May 27, 1997
i 3.2 Resolution Appointing Liz Newton as Deputy Recorder for the period
of June 23, 1997 to July 3,1997 - Resolution ho. 97-
,.~a~~l~~
Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any
items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for
separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council
has voted on those items which do not need discussion.
COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 2
w
'w
7:50 p.m.
I
4.
Public Hearing Cancelled: National Mortgage Comprehensive Plan
Z
j
Amendment (CPA 94-0001/ZON 94-0001) (Location: 11300 SW Bull
j
Mountain Road)
7:55 p.m.
5.
PUBLIC HEARING -1997-98 USES OF STATE REVENUE SHARING
a. Public Hearing Opened
b. Declarations or Challenges
C. Summation by Budget Officer
d. Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents
e. Recommendation by Budget Officer
f. Council Questions or Comments
g. Public Hearing Closed
h. Consideration by Council
• RESOLUTION No. 97-QLO - A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE
i
CITY OF TIGARD PROVIDES SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR
I
STATE SHARED REVENUES
• ORDINANCE NO. 97- 05 - AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE
CITY'S ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES
-
8:05 p.m.
.
I
6.
PUBLIC HEARING -1997-98 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET
a. Public Hearing Opened
b. Summation by Finance Director
C. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents)
d. Recommendation by Finance Director
e. Council Questions or Comments
f. Public Hearing Closed
3
g. Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 97-a7
8:15 p.m.
g
7.
FINALIZE FORMATION OF SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT
NO.9
a. Staff Report: City Engineer
- -
8:25 p.m.
-
8.
PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT - FIVE YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
a. Staff Report: City Engineer
b. Open Public Comment (Proponents, Opponent)
C. Close Public Comment
d. Council Discussion
e. Council Consideration: Determine, by Council motion, the Capital
Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 1997-98
q
COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 3
I.
i
I
9:00 P.M.
9. PRESENTATION: PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE UPDATE
Bob Post of BRW Consultants
9:30 p.m.
10. REQUEST LAND USE APPLICATION FEE WAIVER
a. Report by Senior Planner Dick Bewersdorff
9:40 P.M.
11. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
9:50 P.M.
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss
labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation
issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are
confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those
present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this
session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this
session.
® i COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 4
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 24, 1997
lG
Agenda Item No._e.
Meeting of a c~
• STUDY SESSION
i
> Meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m. by Mayor Jim Nicoli
> Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli, Councilors Paul Hunt, Brian Moore, Bob Rohlf, and Ken
Scheckla.
> Staff Present: City Manager Bill Monahan; Legal Counsel Pam Beery; City Engineer Gus
Duenas; Finance Director Wayne Lowry; Senior Analyst/Risk Manager Loreen
Mille Acct, to the City Manager Liz Newton; and Associate Planner Duane
Roberts.
> Feed & Seed property
i
y
Bill Monahan, City Manager, asked what the Council wanted to do about securing the city
owned property at the Feed & Seed store once the Chamber completed taking the building
down. Options included opening it up as a dirt parking lot or fencing it off completely for
liability reasons. He said that a paved parking lot was not in the 1997/98 budget because staff
did not expect the Chamber to complete their building plan in this fiscal year. Staff did not want
i to put in a parking lot not knowing what the final Chamber plan would be. _
The Council discussed the issue, favoring a "park at your own risk" lot after seeing what the
land looked like with the building removed. Mayor Nicoli pointed out the need for a fence to
prevent access to the railroad tracks. Mr. Monahan said that John Cook of the Chamber has told
him that the Chamber did not intend to fence its portion of the property. Loreen Mills, Senior
Analyst/ Risk Manager, pointed out that the liability increased if the land was in poor
condition or left with hazards. Mr. Monahan said that staff would come back with a report in b
July once the building was down.
> Space Committee
y i
Mr. Monahan recommended five staff and four community people as the base committee for the
Space Committee. Staff included Liz Newton, Bill Monahan, Ed Wegner, Ron Goodpaster and
i Kathy Davis. Staff recommended getting two Library Board members and two Police Advisory
Board members. Mr. Mon--".a . also r...,,,...mended hiring Puss Hanscn, the architect ha
worked on the police expansion plans, as an ex officio advisory member because of his
construction background. The cost for the committee would be $5,000 to $7,000 of the $20,000
budgeted for spacing planning in 1997/98. He suggested including Wayne Lowry as an ex
officio member and Councilor Paul Hunt as a voting member.
i
The Council agreed by consensus to direct staff to create the committee as described and to hire
Mr. Hansen as the consultant.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 1
1
> Lamb-Gray Property
Mr. Monahan reported that the City closed on the Lamb Gray property on June 11. He said that
the money has been handled per the escrow instructions.
> Agenda Review
Liz Ner:ton, Assistant to the City Manager, advised the Council to delete Consent Agenda
Item No. 3.2 because it was dealt with last week. ,
I
> Tigard Triangle Update
Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director, presented Lloyd Lindley's work program
on how to implement the Council direction from last week that staff meet with the property
owners and potential builders to test the standards. It included three steps: a review of and
evaluation of similar developments in Tigard, an investigation into the operational needs of big
box retail, and a report summarizing the research and recommendations for Council. He
mentioned a workshop involving not only potential developers and key property owners but
outside experts who have done creative mixed use developments on the West Coast. He
0
estimated the cost of the program to be between $10,000 to $15,000. He said that staff could
update the Council periodically on their progress.
Mr. Hendryx noted the issue of who should pay for this program: the City only or in
combination with the developers/property owners? The Council discussed the issue. Councilor
Scheckla pointed out that the property owners would probably not want to pay for a process that
yielded an unfavorable result for them. They also might conclude that paying for it meant the
results should be slanted their way. He spoke for the City paying for the program.
Councilor Moore spoke for asking the developers to help offset the costs since they wanted this
process. Mayor Nicoli said that he was not opposed to the City paying for the whole thing,
although they could ask the developers for funds. Councilor Hunt acknowledged Councilor
Scheckla's point that the City would have difficulty convincing the public that the developers
did not pay for things going their own way, if the results were favorable to the developers.
Councilor Rohlf supported asking for financial support from the property owners.
Councilor Moore said that he was confident that they would get a good decision regardless of
who paid for it, and that he did not have a problem telling people so. Councilor Scheckla
reiterated that the City paying for the study would gamer better public relations in the long run.
Mayor Nicoli and Councilor Hunt agreed with Councilor Scheckla.
The Council agreed that the staff approach was good but split on who should pay for it with
three Councilors supporting City funding only (Nicoli, Scheckla, and Hunt) and two supporting
financial assistance from the property owners (Moore and Rohlf).
Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, King City, asked what the definition of local
origin was. Mayor Nicoli suggested that Mr. Polaris meet with Mr. Hendryx at another time to
discuss his question.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 2
t
P
I
IJ
F
n
> Cook Park Update
Councilor Hunt reported on a meeting that he, Mayor Nicoli, Mr. Hendryx, and Mr. Wegner
held regarding Cook Park as a response to the environmentalist concerns. He said that Mr.
Wegner would install a four foot high fence 30 feet from the wetlands, and start planting trees
for a buffer. They would use the trees being removed from the Menlor reservoir site to !
temporarily mark the parking lot. They would eventually test the parking lot as a gravel parking
lot but not this year.
Councilor Hunt spoke to getting a design for the bandstand/gazebo as soon as possible. He
suggested getting input from Tigard music organizations on what they needed. He mentioned
that Mr. Wegner would wait until fall to install sewer and irrigation lines and underground ;
wiring so he could use the project as a training ground for his people. He said that an arborist
would evaluate which of the trees between the Gray property and the park could be saved or
taken out.
Councilor Hunt mentioned that the gazebo would be on pontoons so it would float during a
flood, and that the restrooms would be transportable so they could be removed during the winter
or flooding.
> Summer Lake Improvements
Mr. Monahan referenced the memo Gus Duenas, City Engineer, prepared at his request
reviewing the Summer Lake situation in light of the United Sewage Agency's (USA) report last
November and staff discussions. -
Mr. Duenas reported that the USA plan to improve water quality at Summer Lake was low
priority and involved additional plantings and islands. Staff has contracted with a firm to test
the sediment in the lake within the next two and a half weeks. This was at USA's request
because the lake has never been dredged and no one knew what was at the bottom of it. He said
that the City had a full range of options available to deal with the lake, from draining it for
dredging and reflooding to minor improvements, but it was difficult to identify the most
appropriate action without knowing what the lake contained.
Mr. Duenas emphasized that staff was not prepared to discuss the possible options until the
sediment test was complete. They would return to Council on July 22 with a report for
discussion at that time. He said that USA recommended $354,000 worth of minor improvements
at this time but due to it being Item #54 on the priority list, the improvements would probably
not occur within the next five years.
Councilor Moore asked for clarification on minor repairs costing $350,000. Mr. Duenas
reviewed the USA proposal to create additional islands to increase shade, to plant landscape
vegetation to create a defined edge, to remove non-native plants and animals, and to add
appropriate habitat structure. He said that this was minor compared to the cost of dredging the
pond and refilling it.
In response to a question from Councilor Hunt, Mr. Duenas said that the City could use the
water quality portion ($702,000) of the surface water SDCs ($2 million) to pay for the '
improvements. Mayor Nicoli pointed out that although USA would not proceed quickly with
'ITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 3
F
e)
o+.
a
i
~ I
. 'D
j
Summer Lake improvements, the City could move forward immediately since they had the
funding available.
Mr. Duenas said that part of the goal of the Council was to look at the options beyond the USA
proposal, and at what options the City could pay for. He reiterated that they needed the results
of the sediment study before moving forward.
I
Councilor Rohif commented that no one had been impressed with the USA proposal. He
expressed his hope that the City could take charge and steer the project towards meeting the
City's goals over USA's.
Mayor Nicoli opened the meeting up to public testimony. i
> Van S. Camp, 12481 SW Edgewater, submitted letters from citizens unable to attend the
meeting. He said that last year he researched the options available and came to the same
conclusion as the City Engineer on the need for core samples to determine what was on the
bottom of the lake. He contended that USA's proposal to create additional islands would turn
the lake into a stream which would in turn decrease property values in the area. He pointed out
that the park was used by hundreds of people in Tigard, not simply by the neighbors. He said
that building the bridge had been a wise move to provide better park access. He stated that he
opposed thinking of the lake as something disposable.
> Howard Banta, 12580 SW Glacier Lily Circle, said that during his 1 I year residence as a park
neighbor he has worked to improve and maintain the park. He mentioned that the lake was
originally created as part of the Council approval of the Summer Lake planned development -
north of the lake and south of Scholls Ferry. He referenced the Fanno Creek Watershed
Management Plan, part of the Tualatin River improvement plan, citing its goal "to improve
water quality and flood management." He agreed with Mr. Camp's analysis that the projected
improvements (S-4) would turn the lake into a stream with the purpose of achieving a variety of f
water quality improvements.
Mr. Banta contended that the benefits possibly accruing with those improvements were
unquantified. The plan did not say that making these improvements or destroying the lake
would in fact make the difference that would bring the Tualatin River up to federal standards.
He pointed out that the plan ignored protecting Summer Lake for its aesthetic and recreational
values. He said that it was the largest body of publicly owned water in Tigard, and was
beautiful at least nine months of the year. G
Mr. Banta acknowledged that during the summer the lake became infested with weeds due to
pliosphorous loads coming downstream from construction projects on Cooper Mountain. He
pointed out that nothing has been done in the past eight years to help the lake deal with this
excessive burden. He argued that the Tualatin River could meet the federal water quality
standards without destroying Summer Lake. He spoke for maintaining the beauty of a large
body of water surrounded by pleasant fields where children played instead of eliminating the
lake to make unquantified and unknown improvements to water quality in Fanno Creek and the
Tualatin River.
> Bill Gucker, 12492 SW Edgewater Court, thanked the City and USA for the improvements
already made that have helped with the lake edges and water quality. He said that if Summer
i 1
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 24, 1997 -PAGE 4
i
I
Lake was allowed to deteriorate much further it would have to be renamed Summer Swamp. He
1 mentioned concerns of mosquitoes, declining property values, and lost City revenues. He asked
for an inexpensive but reasonable solution to insure that Summer Lake continued as a beautiful
lake. He invited the Councilors to a luncheon tour of the lake this summer.
j > Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, King City, asked if there was the possibility of
I a local health problem with mosquitoes in Summer Lake. Mr. Duenas said that they would not
know the lake conditions until they completed their testing. He said that he was not aware of
mosquito breeding at this time, although it was possible.
> Ed Halberg, 12630 SW Glacier Lily Circle, expressed his concern that Summer Lake Park not
be forgotten amid the discussions on Cook Park. He said with Council not accepting the USA
proposal either, the most prudent thing to do was to complete the test and hold a discussion on
July 22 as staff recommended.
Mayor Nicoli commented that the City planned on planting 200-300 trees in Summer Lake Park
as part of the Council goal to plant 2000 trees in Tigard by the year 2000.
> Allen Hemdobler, 12910 Glacier Lily Circle, said that he has lived in the Summer Lake
development since 1981. He said that the City used to treat the lake chemically every year to
kill the weeds, and spoke to reinstating the practice. He mentioned other less expensive but still
practical methods of eliminating the weeds: raking them and installing sterile carp to eat the
weeds.
~y > Marie Collier, 12469 SW Edgewater Court, testified to the high usage of the park and its
safety as a place to take children.
> Lauri Portwood, 10835 SW Pathfinder Way, left her name with the staff for volunteer
opportunities for Scouts.
> Jean Camp, 12481 SW Edgewater Court, spoke on the intense use of the park by the
community, including the schools, daycare classes, people playing a variety of sports, and
1 walkers.
1. BUSINESS MEETING
• Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board
Mayor Nicoli called the business meeting to order at 7:47 p.m.
• Cnnne.il ('nmmnnirat;nnc/T ;n;cnn P-1,
i
Councilor Hunt reported on a meeting he attended on affordable housing. He mentioned the
County owned affordable housing project on SW 95`h off Greenburg Road, Dove Court
Apartments, noting how nice it was.
• Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
Mayor Nicoli noted the deletion of Consent Agenda Item No. 3.2.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE s
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA
> Jack Polaris, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, King City, asked if the CIT members attended
the Planning Commission meetings and what the budget cost was for the CIT program. He also
asked for clarification on the City policy for drug screening of employees, both new and current.
Mr. Monahan explained that the City implemented a policy of drug screening new employees as
j
part of compliance with the federal requirements accompanying federal dollars. The only
existing employees screened for drugs were those with commercial driver's licenses, another
{
federal requirement. He said that Ms. Newton would get the budget cost information to Mr.
Polaris.
Councilor Moore explained that the Planning Commission was curious why the CITs did not
attend their meetings; they had not been complaining about it. Staff confirmed that the CITs did
not attend the Planning Commission meetings.
> Terry Smith, 41480 SW Greenburg, noted that MLP 97-0002 has been withdrawn. He
explained the neighbors' concerns that the developer intended to cut down indiscriminately the
tree grove that characterized their street in order to put in more houses and to harvest the trees.
He cited a Comprehensive Plan policy which stated that the City would insure that significant
tree stands would remain substantially unaltered by development. He asked the Council to hold
a hearing on the neighbors' findings that the tree grove was significant and worthy of protection,
i
and for reconsideration of the zoning of their street.
Mr. Smith mentioned the unanimous agreement of the property owners on the street that the
zoning was incorrect and that the tree stand was significant and deserved protection. He
reiterated the importance of the tree grove to the character of their street and maintenance of
property values.
j
Mr. Hendryx said that he would report back to Council on the correct procedures to handle the
issues raised by Mr. Smith. He noted that the applicant resubmitted his proposal shortly after he
withdrew it.
C
I
Mr. Smith said that they would like to discuss possible adjustments to the tree ordinance to
make sure that it offered the protection to large unique tree stands that it should offer. Mr.
Monahan suggested that staff research the Code provisions on this issue, including what
constituted a significant stand of trees. Mr. Smith reviewed the policies of other cities regarding
significant tree groves. He said that the neighbors have done considerable work to establish the
significance of this tree grove.
i
-
Mayor Nicoll pointed out that even if they found the tree grove significant, telling a property
=
owner that he could not build on his property was a "takings." Mr. Smith said that they did not
want to stop development completely, they just wanted the existing neighborhood taken into
consideration. He mentioned that a purpose of the Comprehensive Plan was to insure that any
development did not cause a process of diminution to an existing development. The
neighborhood's fear was that this application did that. They only wanted mitigation and
common sense applied in this situation.
Mr. Hendryx said that he would research this issue with a report back to Council next week.
-
i
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 6
i
i
j
~
1
f
r
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt the Consent Agenda.
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors
i
Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.")
3.1 Approve City Council Minutes: May 27, 1997 I.
3.2 Resolution Appointing Liz Newton as Deputy Recorder for the period of June 23,
I
1997 to July 3, 1997: DELETED
i
4. PUBLIC HEARING: CANCELED National Mortgage Comprehensive Plan Amendment
(CPA 94-0001/ZON 94-0001) (Location: 11300 SW Bull Mountain Road)
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 1998-98 USES OF STATE REVENUE SHARING
a. Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the public hearing.
b. Declarations or Challenges: None
I
I
c. Summation by Budget Officer
i
'
Wayne Lowry, Finance Director, explained that for the City to participate in state revenue
4
d
sharing, it had to elect in a public process to receive those revenues - Ordinance No. 97-05
z;x
For the City to receive the state shared revenues, it had to prove that it provided certain
-
services - Resolution No. 97-26.
i
Councilor Scheckla asked what the difference was between this year and last year's revenue
sharing. Mr. Lowry said it was up a bit this year due to population growth and per capita
income increases. He said that the estimates included an assumption that the state gas tax
would increase this year. He stated that they saw revenue sharing as a solid and stable
revenue source at this time. The money was used for general purposes in the general fund. I
d. Public Testimony
e. Recommendation by Budget Officer
Staff recommended approval.
f. Council Questions
g. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing.
h. Council Consideration
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Ordinance No.
97-05.
l
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 7
1
- 1
1
The Acting City Recorder read the number and title of Ordinance No. 97-05.
j
ORDINANCE NO. 97-05 , AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE CITY'S ELECTION
TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES
Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli,
Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.")
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt Resolution No. 97-
26.
.
The Acting City Recorder read the number and title of Resolution No. 97-26.
RESOLUTION No. 97-26 , A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY OF TIGARD
PROVIDES SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR STATE SHARED REVENUES
t„
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli,
Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.")
6. PUBLIC HEARING - 1997-98 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET
I a.
Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the public hearing.
b.
Declarations or Challenges: None
c.
Summation by Finance Director
,
Mr. Lowry presented the 1997/98 fiscal year budget. He mentioned that it was identical to
the budget approved by the Budget Committee with no adjustments.
d.
j
Public Testimony: None
e.
Recommendation by Finance Director
1
Mr. Lowry recommended approval.
' f.
Council Questions
`
g.
Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing.
f
h.
Council Consideration: Resolution No. 97-27
Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Resolution No.
97-27.
The Acting City Recorder read the number and title of Resolution No. 97-27.
RESOLUTION NO. 97-27, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD APPROVING
{
THE BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS, DECLARING THE AD VALOREM TAX
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 8
i
i
AN-
LEVY AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS PROVIDED BY ORS 310.0602 FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1997-98.
ii Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli,
Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.")
7. FINALIZE FORMATION OF SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT
NO.9
I Mr. Duenas reported that the estimated costs for Reimbursement District No. 9 (approved by
Council on April 22, 1997) have remained at $130,670.56. There was no revision to the
engineer's report. He asked the Council to hold an informal public hearing on the district
formation, and to approve its final formation. He explained that these actions would trigger the
hookup of the sewer system on Fairhaven Way and Fairhaven Street. There were 29 residences
that could hook up and much interest from homeowners in doing so.
Mayor Nicoli opened the public hearing and asked for any public comment. There was none.
Mr. Duenas recommended approval of the final formation of the reimbursement district.
Councilor Scheckla asked about the minor problems in that area that needed to be remedied.
Mr. Duenas said that staff was withholding final payment to the contractor until he finished the
repair work.
Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing.
Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt Reimbursement
District No. 9.
8. PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT - FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors
Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.")
Mr. Duenas reviewed the CIP process that went through the CITs for public input and the
Planning Commission for recommendation to Council. He reviewed the CIP projects in streets,
parks, water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage. He mentioned that the street projects had two
funding sources: the gas tax and the TIF funding. He noted that they set aside $500,000 of gas
tax funds for the pavement maintenance program. He asked to increase the speed hump
program funding by $25,000 to provide sufficient funds for whatever traffic calming measures
were implemented on North Dakota. He suggested decreasing the 79'h Ave design right of way
by $25,000 to balance the books.
Mr. Duenas reviewed the specific funding levels for other street projects. He mentioned that the
City had to bear the full cost of the Bonita Road improvements from the railroad tracks to the
Fanno Creek Bridge ($800,000 from TIF funds). He recommended the realignment of Walnut
and Tiedeman over the next two years, even though it was in the County.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 9
a Mayor Nicoli noted that the City now had a say in the allocation of the TIF funds collected from
the urban services area. Mr. Monahan pointed out that most of the TIF funds would come from
Bull Mountain and spending fees collected in one area on another area would send the wrong
message. He suggested discussing the situation with the County, and directing Mr. Duenas to
use City funds for the Walnut Island areas but try to lessen that amount if possible using County
TIF funds. I
Mayor Nicoli commented that he thought that the County was at the point of being willing to do I
something to address citizen complaints regarding Walnut and 12151. He suggested revisiting :
the issue later.
fMr. Duenas mentioned a Community Development Block Grant for $166,800 to construct the
project on 91" Avenue between Greenburg Road and Lincoln Street. The City was contributing
$23,200 in in kind services. The money would be available in July.
Councilor Hunt asked if the City bought the property at Ross and Sattler so that the intersection
could be widened. Mr. Duenas reported that they bought the right of way through there in order
to do the realignment. However the actual realignment was not in this budget. He noted that the
major problem at the intersection was drainage.
i
Councilor Scheckla asked if the school district has paid for its part of the 79`h and Durham
signal. Mr. Monahan said that they requested to be billed, which staff has done.
I
Councilor Scheckla asked about the timing of the street closing for the Tiedeman bridge. Mr.
Duenas explained that its scheduled July 15 closing was timed with the July 7 opening of Grant -
Street.
Councilor Rohlf asked if they were gaining or losing ground in the pavement maintenance
program. Mr. Duenas said that they were gaining ground but they were not out of the woods
yet. The revenues from an increased state gas tax would help greatly. However if that did not
go through, they would have to scale back on that program. He said that between $100,000 to f.
$200,000 worth of projects were added each year. He spoke to the importance of preventative
maintenance in extending the life of a road versus the costs of pavement reconstruction.
Councilor Rohlf asked if anyone applied for the joint cost program for street humps. Mr.
Duenas said no.
{ Duane Roberts, Associate Planner, reviewed the park improvements in the CIP. He pointed f
I out that it did not fully address the Cook Park improvements of $2.4 million. He explained that
the first year showed budgeted projects with tentative projects listed ur uie next f bur years. He
mentioned park acquisition opportunities along the Tualatin River and the property adjacent to
Woodward Park that Metro purchased. He said that the original play structure at Woodward
Park as been evaluated as safe for older children; the play structure listed in the CIP was a new
play structure for younger children.
Mr. Roberts mentioned trail acquisitions needed to complete the Tigard Street/Fowler School
trail between North Dakota and Tigard Streets, and to extend the Woodward Park trail down to
Grant Avenue. He noted the parks master plan authorized by Council, and the unidentified
greenspaces projects using Metro regional money.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 1 o
1 > Lauri Portwood, 10835 SW Pathfinder Way, mentioned the excitement in the community
9 over the expansion of Woodward Park. She said that an inactive park was an invitation to
vandalism and other such activities; an active park discouraged it.
> John Cook, 12314 SW Millview Court, spoke in support of the expansion of Woodward Park
1 and of trails. He asked if the speed hump program was delayed last year because of Measure 47.
Mr. Duenas said they received bids for the humps that staff considered too high. Now staff was
looking at doing in-house the speed bumps for 1281h Locust, SW North Dakota. Money for a
{ new set of speed humps was included in this year's budget.
Mr. Cook asked on the status of the parking lot at the feed & seed store. Mr. Monahan said that
the City planned to wait until the Chamber's plans were finalized before designing the parking
lot.
Councilor Rohlf asked about the list of greenspace projects identified last year. Mr. Roberts
said that while some had been acquired, a lot had dropped out because Council felt that the price
{ was too high. Staff intended to return to the CITs for input regarding the allocation of
{ greenspaces money.
Councilor Rohlf said that last year the City lost its acquisition opportunities because the process
did not move fast enough. He expressed concern that unless they changed the process, the same
thing would happen this year. The Council discussed what the public input process should be
on identifying greenspaces for acquisition. Councilor Moore said that while they could reduce
the amount of public process, it was still important to have more public input than just the City
Council. Councilor Rohlf said that he was willing to make these decisions on behalf of the
public in order to move the process along fast enough to acquire greenspaces.
Mr. Hendryx mentioned that this process did require a public hearing which would be just in
front of the Council. Staff could expedite the process by noticing a special public hearing before
I Council. Mayor Nicoli spoke to identifying the "holes" in the city parks system and addressing
those issues. He said that he would like to use a different process this time but not exclude the
CITs.
Councilor Moore asked how long did the City have to spend the Metro greenspaces money. Mr.
a Roberts said that they had until September 1998, although they could get extensions. He
i explained that Tigard was about average in the region on spending the local share money. Only
~I about 20% has been used regionally.
Mr. Hendryx said that staff would work to implement the Council's new direction.
Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Hunt, for adoption of the 1997/98
Capital Improvement Program.
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors
- Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.")
Councilor Scheckla congratulated Mr. Lowry on the award he received on behalf of the City for
excellence in financial reporting.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 11
9. PRESENTATION: PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE UPDATE
Bob Post, BRW Consultants, presented their report on the possibilities of commuter rail
service as commissioned by Washington County, Beaverton, Tigard, Sherwood, Tualatin, and i
j Wilsonville. He introduced Martin Paul, a team member with expertise in commuter rail
operations. He mentioned that Metro, Tri-Met, and ODOT also participated in this Interurban
rail study of the possible use of the existing railroad line from Wilsonville to Beaver Creek (past
j Beaverton) as a commuter railline. He reviewed the differences between commuter rail and
light rail. Commuter rail shared a rail line with freight trains and had stations three to five miles
j apart. Light rail used specialized tracks and equipment with stations about half a mile apart.
Mr. Post mentioned the reasons behind the study. These included population and employment
growth in east Washington County, the decision not to pursue the western bypass, the difficulty
of traversing the corridor using the existing transit system, and the desire for a lower cost
solution than a highway or light rail system.
Mr. Post noted the advantages of a commuter rail system on this line. The track was now under
one operator (although it had two owners) which would make negotiations easier. In addition, a
number of key regional employers had plants in this corridor and an interest in efficiently
transporting their workers to and from work. During peak hours, travel time by train versus car
would be faster. It offered an opportunity to be fairly competitive on capital costs, and it was an
existing resource currently underutilized.
Mr. Post explained that his firm was asked to do a "fatal flaw" analysis to determine if there was
any aspect of this idea that could derail it. In addition they did a physical inventory of the line, a
ridership analysis, and a legal assessment. They did not do specific design or cost estimate
work.
Mr. Post reviewed the station locations: Merlo north terminus, Beaverton, Washington Square, I
Tigard, Tualatin, and Wilsonville south terminus. These stations also provided connections with
the existing transit system. He said that the rail line was in good shape with less work needed
than they typically found with rail systems. He described the operating plan they developed as a
foundation for ridership projections, including 30 minute frequency during peak hours with bi-
directional travel. The travel time from Wilsonville to Merlo would be 31 minutes with an
average speed of 37 mph. i
Mr. Post reviewed the findings and conclusions of the study: ~ .
• There were no substantial engineering obstacles;
This project would be at the tow end for capital costs for this type of project;
The ridership estimate was for 1800 trips in the year 2000 and 2300 by 2015;
• No legal or regulatory obstacles to operating a passenger rail service in the corridor were
found;
e The hurdles to be overcome were no different than any other new system put in place within
the last five years.
Mr. Post commented that though the cost was considerably less than other options, it still
represented significant dollars for both capital and operating expenses. Therefore adequate
funding sources would need to be identified. He pointed out that working with the railroad {
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 12
1 meant business deals and negotiations for access to track time which was a different process
[ than used with many public projects. The City would have to cover liability for the railroads,
and find someone to operate the service. A final consideration was building facilities to federal
and state requirements for safe operation of a rail service.
Councilor Hunt asked if the service would need to be subsidized. Mr. Post said that almost all
public transit operations required subsidy (40% to 50%) but that the amount of the recovery
ratio was a matter of policy. He mentioned that the system could be integrated into the existing
transit system or maintained separately.
Councilor Scheckla asked how the tracks would be shared with the railroad Mr Post explained
i
I
Jj
'i
that normally a jurisdiction purchased windows of time for sole use of the tracks with the
railroad running their freight trains other times. The railroad maintained control of dispatching.
Councilor Scheckla asked how the Lake Oswego trolley differed from this proposal. Mr. Post
said that the Lake Oswego trolley was an excursion or recreational trolley running on weekends
and holidays. He mentioned the organizational structure and background of the line, noting that
the private organization operating the trolley was finding it more difficult from a financial
standpoint than originally projected.
Councilor Scheckla asked who would maintain the track. Mr. Post said that would be
negotiated but with a low volume operation, it made sense to leave the actual maintenance of the
line to the railroad with the City sharing the costs.
Councilor Rohlf asked what a reasonable time frame was for this proposal. Mr. Post said that
the key issue was funding. If the funding were in place today, they possibly could move through
the process in 18 months. Other projects have taken four to five years. Martin Paul commented a
that a two to three year time period was a good estimate. t
Councilor Rohlf asked for a ballpark cost estimate. Mr. Post said that the range for these types
of projects was $4 million to $7 million per mile. Two large and unknown expenses were what
it would cost to make a deal with the railroad and what the vehicles would cost. Their
conclusions supported this project landing in the lower end of the cost range.
10. REQUEST LAND USE APPLICATION FEE WAIVER
Mr. Hendryx presented the request from Tualatin Valley Housing Partners, Inc. to waive the
fees associated with processing a Comprehensive Plan and zoning change amendment for the
Hawthorne Villa Apartments. an affordable housing „r,ect• asked
- - b project. He anao~ iui Council •
~i direction on
how to handle the $4500 fee.
Councilor Scheckla asked what was the highest fee that the Council has waived in the past. Mr.
Monahan said that they waived $10,000 in fees for the Rite Center last year. Councilor Hunt
said that with the potential saving of money in police work and other social costs, he had no
objection to waiving the fee. Councilor Moore concurred and spoke for the Council showing its
support of affordable housing through fee waivers.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 24, 1997 - PAGE 13
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC.
Legal
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684.0360 Notice TT 8863
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising
.City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice
i.
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
j
•Tigard,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit
.Accounts Payable •
i_
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
o•
STATE OF OREGON,
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )SS' ±
i, Kathy Snyder
being first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Advertisingg
ard-Tu
Dir
t
hi
Ti
l
i
i
l
ti
T
g
ec
or, or
s pr
a
a
nc
pa
n
clerk, of the
imes
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at Tigard in the
aforesaid county and state; that the
City Council BlcinPaa Meet inq
f
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
OFFICIAL SEAL
JACQUELINE AR£t.LANO
June 19,1997
NOTARY PUSLIC-OREGON
F
COMMISSION NO. 301011
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 9. 2001
-
i
Subscribed and swor 'to before me thisl 9+h r1aj, f . , 1997
Notary Public for Oregon
My Commission Expires:
AFFIDAVIT
.
i
The following meeting highlights are published for your information. Full
agendas may be obtained from the City Recorder, 13125 S.W. Hall
Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639-4171.
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
June 24, 1997
i'
TIGARD CITY HALL-TOWN HALL
13125 S.W. HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON
!
Study Meeting (Red Rock Creek Room) (6:30 P.M.)
• Executive Session
• Agenda Review
Business Meeting (Town Hall) (7:30 P.M.)
Public Hearings: -
• 1997/98 Budget Hearing
• Election to Receive State-Share Revenues
P
bli
H
C
ll
d
i
u
c
ear
ance
:
ng
e
• National Mortgage Com rehensive Plan Amendment (CPA
94-0001/ZON 94-0001). Location: 11300 SW Bull Mountain
;
Road)
Public Opportunity to Comment:
• Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
Business
• Finalize Fairhaven Sewer Reimbursement District
• Presentation: Passenger Rail Service Update (Consultants from
i
BRW)
'
TT8863 - Publish June 19, 1997.
i
S
I
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC.
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 664.0360
BEAVERTON. OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising
*city of Tigard ° ❑ Tearsheet Notice
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
°Tigard,Oregon 97223 ° ❑ Duplicate Affidavit
Legal
Notice TT 8851
REC EIV ED
JUN 16 1997
CITY OF TIGARD
°Accounts Payble °
e• ~
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON, )ss
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) 4
i KatbV Rn~rdar -
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of theT, ga d-Ti,a 1 at i n Times
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at Tigard in the
aforesaid county and state;thatrthe
Hearing-National Dlotaage Company
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
Junel2,1997
Subscribed and sworn tbe this e,1997
OFFICIAL SEAL
ROBIN A. BUROEBS
100 NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON
Notary P is for Oregon
COMMISSION NO. 062071
My Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16, 2001
A00Kr1AVIT
i
I.
The following will be considered by the Tigard City Council on June
24, 1997, at 7:30 P.M., at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall Room,
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 9723. Both public oral and written
testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted
in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal
Code and any rules and procedures adopted by the Tigard City Council, or
rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.30.
Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the
close of the hearing on the request accompanied by statements or evidence
sufficient to allow the Hearings Authority and all the parties to respond on
the request, precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based
on that issue, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community
Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is
directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information is
available at City Hall and may be obtained from the Community Develop-
ment Director or City Recorder at the same location, or by calling (503)
639-4171.
PUBLIC HEARING
OMPRE ENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 94.0001/
ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 94.0001
> NATIONAL MORTGAGE COMPANY <
The property owner has requested that the city revoke a portion of its
previous approval of CPA 94-0001/ZON 94-0001. The property was in the
process of being sold to another owner through a sheriff's sale during this
time in which National Mortgage claimed ownership of the property,
which was incorrect. LOCATION: 11300 SW Bull Mountain Road;
WCTM 2S110AC, Tax Lot 01100. APPLICABLE REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.32. ZONE: The
property is currently designated R-25. The R-25 Zoning District provides
sites for single-family attached and low, medium rise multiple-family
residential units for medium-high density residential development. The
property owner has requested that the property be re-designated General
Commercial (C-G). The C-G Zoning District permits the provision of a
range of major goods and services.
J
TT8851 -Publish June 12, 1997.
i
l
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In the Matter of the Proposed
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
City of Tigard )
I, ~D) /1 a V AV/l~/l begin first duly sworn, on oath,
depose and(Aay:
That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance
Number (s) 9-7-05
which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated a y 7 copy(s)
of said ordinance(s) being reto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the _
q a b day of (mod. , 19 a'
W/ 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
2. Tigard Library, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
3. Tigard Water Department, 8777 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon
Subscribed and sworn to before me this a~ day of ~1L1.0 P , 19_.
f7II//~-2/rll~7Gf~
OFFICIALSEAL 156tary public for Oregon
JILL ANN DRUMMOND
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
COMMISSION NO. 058924
My Commission Expires: (Ei/lLX7~'" a~.
FYPIFFS OCTOBER ER 2 28.2000 ~ ~
~.v rnuuiccvw
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 97- Gz
'AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE CITY'S ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Pursuant to ORS 221.770, the City hereby elects to receive
state revenues for the fiscal year 1997-98.
This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the
Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City
Recorder.
PASSED: By _Lh- dkk nftnyp vote of all council members sent
after being read by number and title only, this 3pe
day of !A XIA 1997.
Gaz
EU-wgh inn 1Jew*, city
A
0 PPROVED: By Tigard City Council th' day of ,
1997.
s Nicoli, Mayo
Approved as to form:
City Attorne
i
Date
I certify chat a public hearing before the budget committee was held ( .
April 1, 1997, and a public hearing before the City Council was held on j
June 24, 1997, giving citizens an o portunity to comment on the use of
State Revenue Sharing. ,1A& 1
LAAA1 L-1
D t
ORDINANCE No. 97-
AGENDA ITEM NO. -VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE : June 24. 1997
1
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from
you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns
through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
r
NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE
TOPIC
STAFF
CONTACTED
(oC('~~~~y~~
a p
A riI S tJll 4~ S K1 ~cT C f
/:2
Su,
l
C U
z cl.~ s~ ~ 1. ~_ti
;f„
J acnxSG~
SfIJY~biu LCc~~✓
® I:WdmljoW1sttshLdm
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 - VISITOR'S AGENDA - PAGE 2 DATE: June 24J997
1 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
'Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from
you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns
through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE
TOPIC
STAFF
CONTACTED
I ~II'~ ti s w C~ s
r E
Xj!f
~7,Y `U 2 ~
I05 Sti~~ 2'y
Z_
C~
depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of
"time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may
further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement
oral testimony.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7
DATE: June 24, 1947
PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT - FIVE YEAR CAPAITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS '
s
/GENDA ITEM NO. 7
Proponent - (Speaking In Favor)
i
i
- 3
i
i
i
l
)Name, Address and Phone No. Address and Phone No.
t
)j
4
3
~i
i
i
• i
PLEASE PRINT
Oononent - (SoeakiRQ Asainst)
one No.
Name//, Address and Phone G
l1-~
-V W
lAdC
i pga 6 ~ ~ ~o~ } (L U)
x'72-2 3 ~U - J ~ oa
Name,
Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name,
Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name,
Address and Phone No.
Name,
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name,
Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name,
Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
--l
1
DATE: June 11, 1997
I
SUBJECT: Progress in Evaluating Proposed Summerlake Improvements as Requested by
i
Council on November 12, 1997.
. I
Background - Last fall, several residents near the park expressed concerns to City staff about the
appearance of the lake water. We informed the residents of the Fanno Creek Basin Management
Plan planning effort by USA that was intended to improve water quality of tributary streams of
Fanno Creek such as Summerlake Creek. We told them that the results of the study would be made
available to them upon completion.
Council also considered the issue during it's November 12, 1996, meeting. USA and City staff
provided Council with an update of the progress of the plan with specific attention to Summerlake.
Several options for Summerlake were discussed concluding with direction from Council that staff
work with USA to further explore these options and perhaps propose additional options that the
City could pursue outside of the Basin Plan.
The concerns of Council and area residents that the lake be maintained as a developed park
instead of being returned to a more natural condition were considered by the Basin Plan Project
Committee and resulted in a final plan that recommended only a low priority project of planting
native riparian plants along the lake and proposed islands.
Current Efforts - As directed by Council, City staff has requested assistance from USA. In
response, USA staff suggested that the next step be testing of the sediment in the lake. This is
expected to provide information that will better enable USA staff to evaluate the proposed options,
which Include aeration and weed and sediment removal, and hopefully suggest other options a
well. A consultant to provide this testing is being selected and work is expected to be completed
within tjtree weeks. The results of the testing will be provided to USA for evaluation of available
options.
For each option, staff expects to provide an explanation of whether or not the option is feasible. Fc
options that are feasible, staff will provide rough cost estimates. The results of this evaluation wi
be available to Council at its July 22, 1997 meeting; staff will be available to answer questions an
receive further direction.
7 I \ENG%GJREGkPAM.SUMMERLK DOC
`J H
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Bill Monahan
FROM: Gus Duenaso_o_~
DATE: June 11, 1997
SUBJECT: Progress in Evaluating Proposed Summerlake Improvements as Requested by
Council on November, 12, 1997. - -
Background - La t r
fall, several residents near the park expressed concerns to City staff about the
appearance of the lake water. We informed the residents of the Fanno Creek Basin Management -
Plan planning effort by USA that was intended to improve water quality of tributary streams of
Fanno Creek such as Summerlake Creek. We told them that the results of the study would be made
available to them upon completion.
Council also considered the issue during it's November`12, 1996, meeting. USA and City staff
provided Council with an update of the progress of the plan with specific attention to Summerlake.
Several options for Summerlake were discussed concluding with direction from Council that staff
work with USA to further explore these options and perhaps propose additional options that the
City could pursue outside of the Basin Plan
The concerns of Council and area residents that the lake be maintained as a developed park
instead of being returned to a more natural condition were considered by the Basin Plan Project
Committee and resulted in a final plan that recommended only a low priority project of planting
native riparian plants along the lake and proposed islands,
Current E8'orts - As directed bi Council, City staff has requested assistance from USA. In
response, USA staff suggested that the next step be testing of the sediment in the lake. This is
expected to provide information that will better enable USA staff to evaluate the proposed options,
which include aeration and weed and sediment removal. and hopefully --agent ...t,~.
wopl.ons as
ell. A consultant to provide this testing is being selected and work is expected to be completed
within three weeks. The results of the testing will be provided to ]JSA for evaluation of available ,
options.
For each option, staff expects to provide an explanation of whether or not the option is feasible. For
options that are feasible, staff will provide rough cost estimates. The results of this evaluation will
be available to Council at its July 22, 1997 meeting; staff will be available to answer questions and
receive further direction.
hEMG%GREGPARK%SU MMERUCDOc
YRi
i _
1 '
MEMORANDUM
{
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Bill Monahan
FROM: Gus Duenas *
DATE: June 11, 1997
SUBJECT: Progress in Evaluating Proposed Summerlake Improvements as Requested by
Council on November.IZ, 1997..
Background - Last fall, several residents hear the 'expressed concerns to City staff about the
appearance of the lake water. We informed the residents of the Fanno Creek Basin Management -
Plan planning effort by USA that was intended to improve water quality of tributary streams of
Fanno Creek such as Summerlake Creek. We told them that the results of the study would be made
available to them upon completion. `
Council also considered the issue during it's November 12, 1996, meeting. USA and City staff
provided Council with an update of the progress of the plan with specific attention to Summerlake.
Several options for Summerlake were discussed concluding with direction from Council that staff
work with USA to further explore these options and perhaps propose additional options that the
City could pursue outside of the Basin Plan
The concerns of Council and area residents that the lake be maintained as a developed park
instead of being returned to a more natural condition were considered by the Basin Plan Project
Committee and resulted in a final plan that recommended only a low priority project of planting
native riparian plants along the lake and proposed islands.
Current Efforts - As directed by Council, City staff has requested assistance from USA. In
response, USA staff suggested that the next step be testing of the sediment in the lake. This is
expected to provide information that will better enable USA staff to evaluate the proposed options,
which include aeration and weed and sediment removal, and hopefully suggest other options as
well R conultant to provide this testing is being selected and work is expected to be completed
within t#uee weeks. The results of the testing will be provided to ]JSA for evaluation of available
options.
For each option, staff expects to provide an explanation of whether or not the option is feasible. For
options that are feasible, staff will provide rough cost estimates. The results of this evaluation will
be available to Council at its July 22, 1997 meeting; staff will be available to answer questions and
receive further direction.
tWN=REGWARK%SUM MERLKDoC
5-fud,~j SM5CCy ►
I In Our 42nd Year Cs/ay(Q-1
AQUACUDE
' a4 M1kX my
Bulletin 1997
i
A Do-It•Youself Guide for Weed, Algae, & Bug Contro
F
any to cry J r j W en"-~
L
Hello:
Welcome to the AQUACIDE
COMPANY 1997 BULLETIN. You
will find a variety of products offered
here that many regular customers
say are indispensable! If this is the
first time you've seen our BULLET41,
you'll be glad to know that in 42 years
of business, we've served many,
many tens of thousands of satisfied
property owners like yourself.
Aquacide Company was formed in
1956 to produce and market
Aquacide Pellets. At that time a first
class postage stamp cost 4C and
10 lbs. of Aquacide Pellets cost $14.95.
Today a first class postage stamp
costs 32c and 10 lbs. of Aquacide
Pellets cost $60.95. We think you
will agree that Aquacide Pellets
were and still are a terrific bargain.
Since that time we have grown
considerably and so has our product
line. The reason we have grown is
simple. Our proven products get
you results, are environmentally
sound, and are easy to use.
The products offered here will help
manage your recreational lake or pond
to make the most of your property's
potential. Proper use of these products
will restore or increase the enjoyment
you receive from your property.
improve alit, restore
water oriented activities and
increase the value of your property by
controlling aquatic nuisance weeds
this year.
Our products are environmentally
sound. Each product is registered for
its specific use by the U.S. EPA. In
addition, our products are certified
and approved for use by state
agencies. Those are good reasons to
buy with confidence.
All of the products offered here are
easy to use. Simply follow the
instructions on the container. If you
have questions, please phone us.
We can answer your questions and
provide guidance in selecting the
products you need to achieve
best results.
Substantial discounts are available
to individuals and organizations
requiring 200 lbs. or more of
Aquacide Pellets. Please let us
quote a reduced price for your
larger order.
A large inventory of material is
maintained to insure quick delivery.
Your order will likely be shipped the
day it is received. Voice mail, FAX,
and E-mail available 24 hours a day,
7 days a week. If we are unable to
take your call directly, please try
our voice mail. This will allow you
to request information, place an
order, or ask for a return call. Don't
put off ordering though, summer is
fast approaching.
Sincerely,
The Aquacide Company
■
Why COM.T al aqua6r1 k u5 ed"s?
Aquatic weed infestations adversely effect fish,
wildlife, hunting, fishing, boating, recreation,
irrigation, and drainage. Weeds provide a
breeding ground for mosquitoes, and give
water an unpleasant taste. odor, and color.
Heavy infestations may render an area unsuitable
for fish by exhausting dissolved oxygen in the
water, by blocking sunlight essential to basic food
production, by restricting the movement of fish, or by
rendering shallow water unsuitable for spawning.
Excessive weed growth interferes with the
recreational use of lakes and ponds. Access to
and use of lakes and ponds for hunting and fishing
is reduced. Boating, swimming, skiing, and other
water oriented activities are hampered, reducing
the recreational value of your property and your
water resources. Heavy infestations may restrict
water flow in irrigation canals or drainage ditches.
Improving water quality by controlling aquatic
weeds will restore balance to a body of water,
increase your enjoyment, and help increase your
property value.
What causes weed growth?
The primary factors that influence the growth of
aquatic weeds are water depth, bottom type,
and water clarity. These factors vary from one
body of water to the next and are influenced by
the surrounding watershed.
As lakes age they fill with sediment rich in
nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium. Waters become shallower and
more fertile favoring weed growth.
Weather influences weed growth. Runoff from
heavy rain carries nutrients into the water.
Drought may lower water levels creating shallow
areas suitable for heavy weed growth. Sunlight
contributes to the process of photosynthesis and
weed growth particularly in shallow clear waters.
Human activities contribute to weed growth.
Clearing of land for development and farming
cause soil erosion leading to increased
sedimentation. Discharges from sewage
treatment plants, livestock feedlots, and leaky
septic systems provide additional sources of
nutrients. Hard surfaces such as roads
promote runoff rather than absorption and
natural filtration.
For these reasons waters that would not support
heavy weed growth under natural conditions
may support heavy weed growth as a result of
human activities.
You CAN control aquatic weeds!
There are several methods of aquatic weed
control that you can use. Below is a brief
description of each:
Mechanical Cutting offers immediate short term
control. Extended control can only be achieved
by cutting on a continual basis. Cut weeds
must be removed to prevent fragments from
re-establishing or spreading to other areas. High
cost and limited mobility in shallow waters
prevent the use of large mechanical harvesters by
individuals. Small hand operated equipment is
available for use by individuals.
Biological Control uses weed eating fish,
animals and insects or the introduction of plant
diseases. This method can be slow to
produce results and often is not as effective or
consistent as other methods. Still experimental.
Water Draw Down especially during winter
months is effective on submersed weeds. Drying
out or freezing will destroy the exposed weeds.
Care must be used to prevent destruction of fish
and wildlife habitat. Loss of recreational use may
occur. Marginal weeds may infest new areas .
and become a greater problem than the original
infestation of weeds.
Chemical Control is currently the most
commonly used, most effective, and most
economical method of dealing with aquatic weed
infestations. Aquatic herbicides produce faster,
longer lasting results than other methods.
Aquatic herbicides can be used in localized
areas reducing the impact to non-target sites.
The choice of aquatic herbicide depends on the
weed(s) to be controlled. Best results are
obtained by first identifying your weed(s) and
then selecting a product or products to use.
selecting a Moduct
3.) SELECT A PRODUCT:
1.) CLASSIFY THE WEED: Page 1 t provides a table showing what product
See drawing below. controls what weed(s). Look up your weed(s)
Emersed - Growing in shallow water with to determine which product or products to use.
leaves or stems above the water. Read the product information le confirm the product
Submersed - Growing in deeper water entirely will meet your needs-
below the surface. 4.) QUANTITY TO ORDER:
Floating - Growing unattached or rooted with Estimate the area and volume to be treated. This
floating leaves. can be done by pacing the dock or pier and shore-
Algae - Cellular, lower weed form. No line, measuring from a land survey, or other
distinguishable stem or leaf. Scum and Chara means. Once the area is determined look at the
product information for coverage and cost to
are common. determine the quantity to order.
2.) DETERMINE SPECIFIC WEED(S): 5. PLACE YOUR ORDER:
The following pages picture common aquatic Seepage 30. Please note all information
weeds found throughout the country. Place requested. Place your order via phone,
your weed in a clear glass jar with water and
FAX or mail. A return envelope is enclosed
compare it to the pictures. Pay careful attention for your convenience.
to the leaves. (It's really EQt that difficult!)
f
/Emersed
Floating Algae
r
Submersed
if you are unable to identify your weed(s) consider these options:
A.) Contact your local Fish and Game or County Extension Agent.
B.) Contact a local College or University.
C.) Talk to your neighbors. oo su•e in include leaf and stem.
D.) Send us a sample. To do this. pull 'a sample of each wee
Pat dry with a paper towel and place in a plastic bag. Enclose the sample, a brief note, and your return
address in an envelope and forward to us. Please do not send samples packed in water - they rot,
so do
days nofor a t fully responhe,sample. it will turn to dust and we will be
smell, and are, difficult Allow identify.
unable identify
t
J
■
SUBMERSED WEEDS
MILFOIL (Myrlophyllum): Leaves whorled in
groups of four. Each leaf is divided into many
thread-like leaflets extending from a central rib _ h1illoil
(see feat detail). Forms tangled mats at the surface.
Seed heads develop in mid to late season and
may extend above the water surface. Treat _
when weeds are actively growing before
flowering occurs. zy Parrot
PARROT FEATHER (Mydophyllum Brasiliense) Feather
Also a type of Milfoil. Leaves whorled in \ r-
groups of four to six. Each leaf is divided into G•
eighteen pairs of threadlike segments resembling - ~f~R'<'• • rZ
a feather (see leaf detail). This species differs -~~•`4 .''d' Cr
from other Milfoils b having its foliage partially -
out of the water. Emersed foliage is bright green. • -
COONTAIL (Ceratophyllum demersum): lam. ,tom
Leaves whorled around the stem and have a
serrated appearance (see leaf detail). Spacing
•~j`-
between leaf whorls is variable. Consequently, i>
a,
weeds may be long and sparse or bushy. Near
the end of the stem leaves and whorls are
crowded. Branches are forked repeatedly.
Do not confuse with Chara. Coontail
HYDRIL LA (Hydrilla verticillata)/ELODEA
(Elodea canadensis): These two weeds are JI,
very similar. Both have leaves whorled in -
groups. Hydrilla leaves have a serrated edge.
(See leaf detail for each.) Whorls of leaves are
v
compact Haar the growing tips. Spacing between
whorls increases further down the stem v,~*k j7~y Jr
BLADDERWORT(Utricularia):Finely divided leaves scattered along the stem with numerous . _
bladder like structures on leaves. Stems have of
many branches and are densely leafy at the tips.
Flowers yellow and rise above surface.
~ ss~ rr
See page 11 for what controls what.
Hydrilla
Elodea 1
Drawings provided by:
University of Florida
V 1, IFAS Center for Aquatic
i weeds.
4
i
J
Submersed Weeds...
LEAFY PONDWEED (Potamogeton foliosus):
Short grasslike leaves which measure one to
d branch freely on a slender
three inches long an
stem. Leaves are alternately attached. Clumps
of four to eight fruiting bodies attached to a center
t reed stalk that rises above the
h
or
stem by a s
water surface.
i
Leafy Pondweed
BUSHY PONDWEED (Najas minor): Leaves
are narrow with tiny spines along the edges.
Slightly enlarged at the base. Stems slender
with frequent branching. Leaves oppositely
roups of two or more at a node.
or in
h
d
\
g
e
,
attac
Leaves are densely concentrated at the tips.
t
'
May be confused with Chara. Chara has a strong
Bushy Pondweed does not.
shed
r
.
u
odor when c
SAGO PONDWEED (Potamogeton peclinatus):
,
Leaves are stiff, narrow and threadlike. Stems
'
branched with leaves alternately attached.
Spreading leaves resemble a fan with an overall
bushy appearance. Nutlets appear like beads
ears on a
A~
on a string. Tiny green flower app
ith nullet5 above the water surface.
spike along w
HORNED POND W EED (Zannichellia palustris):
Leaves are long and threadlike, oppositely
`
arranged on the stem unlike other pondweeds.
Seeds found at the leaf base, flattish in shape.
and serrated on one side.
what
l
.
s
See page 11 for what contro
Bushy
Pondweed
Horned
r
Pondweed
ag
T
Pondweed
t'
7,
i
F
Submersed Weeds
LARGE-LEAF PONDWEED (Potamogeton
amplifolius): Leaves both floating and
submersed. Submersed leaves are large.
Floating
and Ia
er to the stem
oblon
wav
,
:yt
(1 .
.
g.
y.
p
,
.
't
leaves are oval shaped. Parallel leaf veins are
evident. Stems are seldom branched. Leaves
r r
` .I i
alternately arranged on stem. Solid. tightly
packed spike of nutlets at tip of weed rises
above water surface.
i
Large-Leaf
FLOATING-LEAF PONDWEED (Potamogeton
Pondweed
nalans): Leaves both floating and submersed.
Submersed leaves are long and narrow. Floating
r
leaves are oblong and slightly heart-shaped at
t
base. Parallel leaf veins are evident. Stems
occasionally branched. Leaves are alternately
f
ik
k
d
e o
e
sp
arranged on stem. Solid tightly pac
, p
nutlets at tip of weed rises above water surface.
CLASPING-LEAF PONDWEED(Potamogeton
om
richardsonii): Leaves wide and wavy with
`,.r Y !t
smooth edges. Broad base clasps the stem.
Upper stem commonly branched and leafy.
Leaves are alternately arranged on stem. Solid
tightly packed spike of nutlets at tip of weed
J
rises above water surface.
Floating-Leal
CURLY-LEAF PONDWEED (Potamogeton
Pondweed
crispus): Leaves thin with wavy and finely
serrated edges. Stems branched. Upper leaves
are often crispy and appear waxy. Leaves
alternately on stem. Flowers born on spikes
rise above the water surface.
Seepage 11 for what controls what.
V
.
Clasping-Leal Y:II
_
_4 9
Pondweed 3 1j
Curly-Leal
Pondweed
~I
6
F
FLOATING WEEDS
DUCKWEED (Lemma minor): Leaves the size
be observed individually
Ma
y
of a pencil eraser.
se observation. Small root
or in clusters upon clo
hairs may be seen hnging down from the
a
No stem is distinguishable.
f
l
'
.
ea
underside of the
Heavy growth will blanket the surface with many
T
/
inches of growth. Duckweed is not interconnected
as is Filamentous Algae. Do not confuse
Duckweed
with Algae.
WHITE WATER LILY (Nymphaea odorata):
i
• Leaves large, round and slit to the center.
Underside of leaf is often purplish. Stem is below
the surface. Roots are thick and fleshy, most
rs are white with multiple
Fl
v
-
owe
often buried in mud.
rows of petals born on a single stalk at or above
the surface. May be confused with Yellow Water
ellow flowers and heart-shaped
ve
h h
i
y
a
Lilies whic
leaves. Yellow Water Lilies are more difficult to
control than white water lilies.
eberi):
h
h
If
r
WATERSHIELD (Brasenla sc
l in shape with smooth edges.
Leaves are ova
Stem is attached to the middle of the leaf. A clear
jelly-like coating covers the underside of the
tems on mature weeds. A dull purple
d
h-
s
leaves an
flower develops in early summer. Treat before
Wafer Lily
jelly-like coating develops.
FALSE LOOSESTRIFE (Ludwigia palustris):
Leaves both floating and submersed Oblong
ear the stem. Leaves oppositely
and narrow n
attached to stem, most often in pairs. Stems
rooted at the joints. Forms tangled mat on
the surface.
Seepage 11 for what controls what.
False Loosestrile
Water Shiold
~ 11
o~
~ J
EMERSED WEEDS
WATER WILLOW (Dianthera americans):
Leaves long, narrow and tapered at each end.
Branched veins evident. Edges are smooth.
Stems are usually unbranched with leaves
oppositely attached. Flowers born on spikes.
purplish in color.
WATER PRIMROSE (Jussiaea uruguayensis):
Leaves are lance shaped with smooth edges.
Veins in leaves are evident. Sterns and leaves
are hairy. Leaves are numerous and alternately
attached. Flowers are bright yellow and develop
at the top of the weed.
BULRUSH (Scirpus spp.): Leaves may or
may not be present. It present, they appear as
a continuation of the stem. Stems are tall and
smooth and either round or triangular in shape.
A loose cluster of brownish flowers and seeds
is located near the tip of the stem.
CATTAIL (Typha lalifolia): Leaves are tall and
flat. Stems are tall, round and unbranched.
Flower is the distinctive cigar-shaped cattail
which is green in early summer and turns brown
and fuzzy in fall. This weed has an extensive
root system. Difficult to control when well
established. Multiple applications may be
required to control this weed.
PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE (Lythrum salicaria):
Leaves slightly heart-shaped at base coming to
a point at leaf tip. Leaves small and more
numerous near tip. Stems rigid. four-sided and
have fine hairs on them. Leaves oppositely
arranged on stem usually in pairs. Flowers
bright purplish on a spike closely attached
to stem.
SMARTWEED (Polygonum hydropiperoides):
Leaves are oblong and smooth on the edges.
Stems are distinctly jointed with leaves alternately
arranged. The lower portion of the stem is rooted
at the joints. Flowers are small and tightly clustered
and are white or pink in color. Weed may be
emersed in shallow water or completely
submersed with only flowers visible above
surface in deep water.
See page 11 for what controls What.
F
Water Willow 1Y";
J
Water
Primrose )
e ~
A ~
AY
t~
„Bulrush
~I
Purple
Loosesfrile
Smamveed
8
it
Emersed (Heeds...
WATER PENNYWORT (Hydrocotyle): Leaves
round with low rounded lobes. Attached at
center to a stern. A leaf is about the size of a
half dollar. Stems extend from a horizontal root
in shallow water. Flowers arise in groups from
smooth stems. Each individual flower has five
small while petals. Ohen rooted in mud forming
dense mats.
SPATTERDOCK (Nupharadvena): Leaves
heart shaped at base. shiny and smooth.
Some leaves float but most stand above water.
Flowers are solitary on a long stalk slightly
above the water surface. yellow with green
outer petals. Roots become very thick once the
weed is well established. Multiple applications
may be required to control this weed.
PICKERALWEED (Pontederia cordata):
Leaves are heart shaped at the base. Veins are
very fine and numerous. Flowers are blue-purple
and crowded on elongated terminal spikes.
Each flower has six petal like parts united
below into a tube.
AMERICAN LOTUS (Nelumbo lutea): Floating
leaves are circular with stems attached to the
center of the leaves underside. Emersed
leaves are also circular and depressed to the
center of the upper surface. Flowers are solitary
pale yellow and composed of numerous petals.
The seed pod is in the flowers center with
seeds embedded in its surface.
WATER CHESTNUT (Traps natans): Submersed
leaves threadlike far apart on the stem. Floating
leaves are nearly triangular or diamond shaped
toothed in the upper half on inflated stems.
Flowers have four while petals.
See page 11 for what controls what.
r.
- , e Water Chestnut
K.
l)
Water Pennywort
it
t
Spatterdock
Pickeral `
Weed 44~J~`1
I1
American
(l Lotus
Emersed Weeds...
REED GRASS (Phragmiles maximus):
-
Leaves are long and flat with parallel veins.
"
Stems are tall and round with alternately arranged
leaves. Flower of weed is made up of spikelets
with long silky hairs such that this portion of
the weed may appear as a silky mass. Stout
rootstocks make this weed difficult to pull out.
GRASS FAMILY (Gramineae): Many kinds of
grasses grow in damp places and at times are
found in water. Leaves are long and slender,
usually ten times as long as wide. Veins within
the leaves run parallel to each other. Leaves
I'
are arranged alternately on the stem. Most
grasses are emersed including but not limited
to Giant Cutgrass, Giant Foxtail, Maiden cane,
Reed
Paragrass, and Sawgrass. Other grasses may
Grass
be submersed including Wild Rice and
Manna Grass.
See page 10 for what controls what.
ALGAE
' CHARA (Chara vulgaris): Leaf-like structures
whorled around hollow stem. Dense growth
attached, but not rooted to bottom. May "carpet"
_
~~yy''q : • t
large areas of a lake or pond bottom. Strong
k
d
h
h
d
M
'
•
mus
y o
or w
en crus
e
.
ay have a gritty
i
d
~
. J
texture
ue to m
neral deposits on the surface.
Do not confuse with higher weeds
! 3
.
FILAMENTOUS ALGAE: Individual filaments
a series of cells joined end to end that give a
thread-like a
earance
Often r
f
rr
d t
pp
.
e
e
e
o as
pond scum. Forms surface "mats". Growth
i
b
t th
i
b
d
Chara
/
eg
ns a
e
ottom an
r
ses to the surface
l i f
as a bubble-filled mass. May also form fur-like
' growths on logs and rocks at the bottom.
PLANKTONIC ALGAE: Microscopic growth
often visible as a greenish tinge suspended in
the upper few feet of water. Severe blooms
may resemble pea soup and actually thicken
< ! a
the water.
1
Seepage 11 for what controls what.
Filamentous Algae
to
0
What Controls What
I Aquaclge Weed>dr>eD Aquathol.Hyd 91hol
Rodeo'
Liquid
CLIquIdP& s Cyr us
1 PeIIGIS
Granular 1 Granular
:
Granular
Granular
Weedtrine-D
Product Pq 15 it Pq 13
P9 77 Pg 18
Pq 14
Pq 21
Pq 1920
Pg 13 F. 19
Informal, on _
SUBMERSED
Milfoll E C-
C C
G
G
Parrot Feather E G
G G
F
G
Coonlall E G
G G
G
G
Elodea'Hydrilla G
G
_
G
E
Bladderwort G G
G
Pondweed G
E E
G
FLOATING
Duckweed G' E
E
E
Water Lily G
F F
E
G
Water Shield E F
G G
G
F
F '
f
False G
Loosestrife
,
EMERSED
Water Willow G F
G
Water Primrose E F
F F
F
Bulrush E F
E
i
Cattail G G
E
F
Purple G
G
Loosestrde
Smartweed G F
G G
F
F
Water Pmnywort. G E
E
Splatterdock G
G G
E
G
Pickeralweed G.
F
Amerlcan Lotus E
G G
G
Water chestnut G
_j
Reed Grass G
E
F
/Grass
. _ .
ALGAE
Filamentous. .
G
G
E
E
Algae
Planktonic G
G
E
E
Algae
_
Chara
G
E
E
water less than 3 feet deep
E = Excellent, G = Good, F =
Fair
Voice: 800-328-9350. 612.4296742 • FAX: 612-4290563 • E-mail: AC.76652.171@CompuServe.com
t
i
Mater Use Restrictions (Days)
HUMAN ANIMAL
IRRIGATION
• PRODUCT ACTIVE ACTVE
I
r °
m
I
c
m
NAME INGREDIENT INGREDIENT -
E
E
IL a Z
F-
o
]
O 1 N o
LL
Op
,
I V
AGuacido 2a
dlohlorophenoxy 175
21 0 0 21
0
21
f
21
POltela
acetic acid
-
Aquaclear 8 bacle,ol slams N A
Pellets
o 0 0 0
0
0
0
Aquashade Acid blue 9. 26 02
• 0 0 0
0
0
0
Acid yellow 23
Aquashadow Acid blue 9. 100
* 0 0 0
0
0
0
Acid yellow 23
Aqualh0l Dipotassium salt 101
1 3 7
r
7
7
Granular of endolt
Weedtrine-D Di at dlbromide 8.54
Liquid
14 1 0 14
14
14
14
Cide Kick 11 tl.1Ilmonene and 100.00
0 0 0 0
0
0
0
related isomers
Clear-Water Aluminum sulfate. 50 50
0 0 0 0
0
0
0
_ Sodium bicarbonate
Cutrine-Plus Copper
7
ethanolamme 3
0 0 0 0
0
0
0
.
Granular
complexes
_
Cutrlne•Plus Copper
0
,,,anolam- 9
0 0 0 0
0
0
0
.
Llquld
complexes
Hydrothol 191 Dimethylalkylamine 11 2
7 25 1 3 7.25
725
7-25
7-25
Granular salt of endothall
Rodeo isopropylam, no 535
01 0 0 0
0
0
0
_ salt of glyphosate
Sonar Liquid Fluridone 41.7
01 0 0 0
30$
30$
30$
aqueous srrrrion
_
Sonar Granular Fluridone 50
slow retoase pellet
01 0 0 0
30$
30$
30$
Not to be used in potable water.
- 1 See label for distance allowed from potable water in
take.
r $ Voluntary restrictions suggested by manufacturer
Useful Conversions
1 acre = 43.560 sq. h.. 1 qt. = 2 pts.
1 oz. = 2 Tablespoon 1 ppm. - 2.7
lbs.lacre
h.
1 aae-f1. =1 aCr x 1 R 1 pt. = 2 cups
1 gal. = 128 ozs. 10
1 dilution - 12 ozs
./1 gal.
i gal. - 4 qts. 1 cup - 8 ozs.
graiNgal. = 17.1 ppm. 9:1
dilution =
13 ozs1
1 gal.
S~ Aquacide Company, 1627 9th Street. P.O.
Box 10748. White Bear Lake. MN
55110-0748
12
WEEDTRINE-D Liquid
Broad spectrum, rapid-acting contact herbicide-
WEEDTRINE-D, with diquat, is a broad
contact herbicide. Ideal
id-acting
ra
tr
m
For difficult to control weeds the addition of
Cutrine-Plus Liquid can boost effectiveness.
,
,
p
u
spec
for use on small bodies of water or small weed
Use of a non-ionic surfactant such as Cide-
Kick II is highly recommended (see page 14)
patches. Successfully controls a broad range
floating, and emersed weeds in
of submersed
One gallon of WEEDTRINE-D covers 4,000 sq. ft.
,
lakes, ponds, and drainage ditches. There is a
wide margin of safety with respect to fish.
of submersed weeds or 8.000 to 10,000 sq. ft.
of floating, emersed, or terrestrial weeds.
Easy to apply.
For floating, emersed or terrestrial weeds, apply
with a tank sprayer (see page 24). To treat
submersed weeds inject below the surface
with a tank sprayer or pour into water in strips
10 feet apart. Treat heavy infestations in sections
to avoid oxygen depletion. Thorough contact
with weeds is necessary for best results.
Water treated with WEEDTRINE-D should not be
used for swimming for 1 day. Wait 14 days for
irrigation, human or animal consumption (see
page 12).
Great on land too! Use around patios, ornamental
gardens, and along fence lines.
Rapidly absorbed by foliage WEEDTRINE-D
begins to work immediately on contact. Wilting
and loss of foliage occur quite rapidly, usually
within a few days.
Effective on many different weeds.
WEEDTRINE-D is effective anytime live foliage
is accessible. Best results occur when applied
to reasonably developed foliage, but before
growth becomes too dense or weeds flower.
"Your Weedtrine-D Liquid and Cutrine-Plus
cleared my pond, in less than two weeks we
could see the fish swimming on the pond floor."
S. L. B., Florida
Under low light conditions WEEDTRINIE-D may
be translocated to other weed parts from the
point of contact. When exposed to light the
herbicide is activated and kills the weed.
Turbid water or mud covered foliage will
reduce absorbtion and effectiveness.
WEEDTRINE-D Liquid is equivalent to and
a direct substitute for AQUAQUAT Liquid.
WEEDT11ME-D Liquid
1 gallon
(trt_a.00^t,.ft.) $ 61.95
4 x 1 gallon
(treats 16,000 sq. et.) 210.00
5 gallons
(treats 20,000 sq. n.) $259.95
Voice: 800-328-9350. 612-429-6742 a FAX: 612-429-0563 • E-mail: AC.76652.171@CompuServe.com
13
L_
J
F
RODEO Liquid
Broad spectrum, root killing, systemic herbicide.
RODEO, with glyphosate is a broad spectrum,
root killing, systemic herbicide. Controls a
broad spectrum of floating and emersed weeds
in and around surface waters. Great on land too!
Thorough systemic action. Applied directly to
exposed foliage, RODEO is absorbed by the
weed killing roots and all. Effective on weeds
which have most of their foliage above water.
Will not work on submersed weeds.
Works on most green vegetation.
Initial results occur in 2 to 4 days. Results begin
with wilting and yellowing followed by full
browning. Well established heavy growth will
require 1 to 3 weeks to show results.
Apply RODEO in mid to late season. Best results
are obtained when applied to actively growing,
well developed foliage. A six hour rain free pe-
riod following application is required for proper
herbicide absorbtion. Effective control of most
green vegetation.
Use 1 to 2 ounces of RODEO and a non-ionic
surfactant such as Cide Kick It. Add water to
make 1 gallon of solution. Apply with a tank
sprayer (see page 24). Uniformly wet foliage,
but not to the point of runoff.
Coverage with RODEO varies depending on
the type of weed treated and density of growth.
Typically 100 gallons of spray solution will cover
1 acre. Well established perennial weeds
may require a second treatment in 3 weeks.
Water treated with RODEO has no use
restrictions (see page 12).
RODEO liquid
2.5 gallons
(treats 2.5 to 3.2 acres) 529.95
CI®E-KICK 11 Non-Ionic Surfactant
Wetting agent, activator & penetrant in one.
CIDE-KICK II is a non-ionic. water soluble,
biodegradable surfactant made from forestry
by-products. Increases effectiveness and reduces
treatment costs when used with foliar applied
liquid herbicides and algaecides.
Stretch your herbicide dollars.
Eliminates beading resulting in a uniform sheeting
action of spray solution over foliage surface.
Maximum contact between spray solution and
foliage is insured. Effectively penetrates the
waxy coating on leaf surfaces. Improved contact
and penetration result in improved control.
Hiahly recommended for use with Rodeo.
Weedtrine-D. and Cutrine-Plus Liquid.
Use 1."L to 2 tablespoons of CIDE-KICK II per
gallon of spray solution for floating, emersed or
terrestrial weeds. For submersed weeds use
3 to 5 tablespoons per gallon of spray solution.
Spray solutions incorporating CIDE-KICK II have
no use restrictions other than those of the
herbicide or algaecide with which it is used.
t1ne:~I
Y"
N
PIT: 7flPif 11
1 quart
(makes up to 130 gallons)............ $18.9s
1 gallon
(makes up to 520 gallons) $ 45.00
A Aquacide Company, 1627 9th Street. P.O. Box 10748, White Bear Lake, MN 551100748
14
l
i
F
F
AQUACI®E Pellets
Selective root killing, systemic herbicide.
AQUACIDE Pellets with 2,4-D are a selective.
With growth halted the weed dies. Kills the entire
root killing, systemic herbicide. Controls sub-
weed roots and all. Initial effects occur in
mersed, emersed, and rooted floating weeds in
7 to 10 days, indicated by brittle stems and
recreational lakes and ponds. Use around
curling leaf tips. Full kill will occur in 3 to 5
docks, boat hoists, swimming beaches and
weeks. Once dead, weeds sink to the bottom
shorelines. There is a wide margin of safety
and decompose.
with respect to fish.
All season long.
Visible effects in 7 to 10 days.
AQUACIDE Pellets are effective any time
Marble size AQUACIDE Pellets sink directly to
susceptible weeds are actively growing. When
the bottom, visibly expand over a period of several
applied in spring and early summer, less material
hours to a day, and stratify a layer of herbicide
is required, less dead weeds occur, and a
at the bottom. Herbicide is released slowly in
longer weed free period will result. In northern
controlled amounts. As weeds grow herbicide
areas applications may begin as soon as ice
is absorbed through leaves, stems, and roots.
has melted and weeds begin to grow.
Successful applications can be made in late
"Please send me: 1-10# Can AQUACIDE
summer and fall. The full effect of late season
Pellets - Have used your product before and
applications may not be fully evident until the
am ytlq! pleased."
following season.
K.T. Illinois
Applications to well established perennial weeds
"This order must be about our 12th order of
such as Cattails or Water Lilies may require a
this product. It keeps working, so keep sending."
second application in 3 to 5 weeks if weeds
F.R., Wisconsin
show signs of recovery.
"Boy, am 1 a great ran of your'stuff' It does
Heavy clay, mud, or silt build up may reduce
just what you say! Thanks."
root absorption by effectively sealing the roots.
Illinois
N
J
Early season application or more than one
.
application may overcome this problem. Water
movement in the form of currents or bottom
Herbicide absorption is quite rapid occurring in
springs may wash herbicide from the treatment
just a few hours under good growing conditions.
site and reduce effectiveness.
Once absorbed the herbicide is translocated
f
throughout the weed to the growing parts o
\
leaves and roots. Growth at these parts
is halted.
Voice: bUU-326-93bU. titL-42`)-b/4L s r-A A: bid-4L`J-Ubb:S • t-mall: Au.tuunz.I l I L,.anipu~erve.uui1
17
4
■
HOW TO ORDER
BY MAIL
Simply complete the order form on the reverse side of this page. Include your mailing and
l
f
l
er
Pl
id
h
i
dd
d
ff
ress
or
iv
y.
ease prov
ys
ca
street a
e
erent.
e a p
shipping addresses if di
Total all charges and enclose payment of a check, money order, or charge card information
(including expiration date). We accept VISA, MASTER CARD, or DISCOVER. Please NO COD.
BY PHONE or FAX
Complete and date the order form for reference.
Phone Numbers Voice Mail Codes
Toll Free 1-800.328-9350 222 Return Call 301 Product Price List
Local 1-612.429-6742 224 Free Catalog 302 Company FAX and Address
FAX 1-612-429.0563 226 To Order
Hours are 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Central Time. Monday through Friday. The best time to call
is Noon to 5:00 pm Central Time. FAX line and voice mail available 24 hours a day. 7 days
a week. To leave a voice mail message. simply press the' key then enter one of the 3
digit codes listed above. To exit simply hang up. To proceed to another mail box press '
key and the desired 3 digit number.
SALES TAX
•
Minnesota customers please add 6.5% state sales tax.
DELIVERIES
Please provide a street address for all deliveries. Mail and phone orders received, and phone
orders recieved by Noon Central Time are usually shipped the same day. Prices include
regular shipping charges within the 48 contigious states. Delivery terms F.O.B. White Bear
Lake. MN. Please add $5.00 for packages shipped to Alaska. Hawaii or Puerto Rico. Most
U p V
shipments are made UPS ground, RPS may be used on occasion. Shipments to Minnesota
or Wisconsin will be sent SPEE DEE unless UPS is specifically requested. Orders over 1000
has. are palletized and shipped common carrier truck. Next Day or 2nd Day Air service is available.
Additional charges apply. Call for quote.
GOVERNMENTS, BUSINESSES, and PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS
Open account NET 30 billings are available to Governments.Businesses and Property
Owners Associations with established credit. Minimum billing of $100.00. Shipping
charges will be added to NET 30 accounts. New accounts may be established by providing
a bank name and two trade references. Please provide reference name, address, phone
=o
number. bank account number and account name. Allow 5 working days to process
new accounts. Call for credit application.
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION POLICY
-
Unopened containers may be returned for credit or refund within 30 days of receipt. Please
phone for return authorization. Returned items must be shipped prepaid and are subject to
• -
a 15% restocking charge. Absolutely no credit will be issued for partial returns of chemical
products not manufactured by AOUACIDE CO.
BULLETIN MAILING LIST
If your address is incorrect, or you are receiving more than one copy of this BULLETIN at the
same address at the same time please send us the address(es) on your BULLETIN(S) with
your instructions regarding changes, corrections. or deletions. We will give you a $5.00
+
discount on a current or future order for proof of duplicates mailed in 1997 to the
same address at the same time.
SOMEONE YOU KNOW WHO WOULD LIKE A COPY OF OUR BULLETIN
ADDRESS:
CITY:
STATE: ZIP:
NAME:
_ _
ADDRESS:
CITY:
STATE ZIP:
AquaCide Company Call Toll Free for Credit Card Orders:
While B9th ear Like M Box 5110'.0746 1-800-328-9350
PHONE: Toll Free 1 800 328 9350
Local 1 612-429-6712 B:oo am to 5:00 pm Central Time Mon - Fri
FAX 1.612.429-0563 (Voice Mail at all other times.)
ORDERED BY: Provide a complete mailing address including PO BOX number
where appropriate.
Name
Address
City.'State,Zip
SHIP TO: We must have a street address rather than a PO Box to assure delivery.
Delivery terms F.O.B. White Bear Lake, MN.
Name
Address
City/State,Zip
Z
i
_ i
IrMETHOD OF PAYMENT il.
CHECK $ AMOUNT ENCLOSED Date Ordered
-I-I
~ ID1 MASTERCARD L.I --I _J I- Iv I 1J - ~LlJ
VISA Expiration Dale '
I_I -I F1 I,
DISCOVER Month Year
i
DAYTIME PHONE( SIGNATURE
PAGE HOW I DESCRIPTION SIZE PRICE ! AMOUNT j
NO. 'MANY! I
F
ITEM TOTAL'
MINNESOTA customers add 6.59o sales tax.
REGULAR SHIPPING (Within continental U.S. included in price.) $0.00 .
SHIPPING AK.HI & PR. $5. 00
Thank you for your order! TOTAL
Catalog prices guaranteed until 12/31/97
i` J
it
l
AgUeCide Company Call Toll Free for Credit Card Orders:
Whde~Boar Lake MNB 551100748 1 -800-328-9350
PHONE: Toll Free 1600-3289350
Local t-6124296742 0:00 am to 5:00 pm Central Time Mon - Fn
FAX 1 612.4290563 (Voice Mail at all other times.)
ORDERED BY: WhProvide ere a complete appropriate. mailing address including PO Box number
Name
Address
CilyrState'Zip -
SHIP TO: pet must d have street address rather than PO Box to assure delivery. Bear Lake, MN.
Name - -
Address
City Slate,Zip
METHOD OF PAYMENT:
L- Date Ordered -1-1-
AMOUNT ENCLOSED -
CHECK $
-_~l.-.~~:_~-~I r--~-~
s VISA -.r
l-_~---._~ _l _I- "
MASTERCARD Expiration Date
Month Year
DISCOVER
DAYTIME PHONE SIGNATURE I_ ) - • -
- AMOUNT
PAGE 'I HOW DESCRIPTION SIZE PRICE
i I . No... MANY,...
ITEM TOTAL,
_1NNESOTA cult-11 add 6.59,6 sales lax
REGULAR SHIPPING (Within continental U.S. A in price.) PR $5. 00
Thank you for your order! TOTAL J b r G r rY
Catalog prices guaranteed until 12/31/97
_I
HOW TO ORDER
-
BY MAIL
Simply complete the order lorm on the reverse side of this page. Include your mailing and
sical street address for delivery
rovide a
h
Please
it diff
t
i
dd
pping a
.
y
p
eren
p
resses
.
sh
Total all charges and enclose payment of a check, money order, or charge card information
(including expiration date). We accept VISA. MASTER CARD, or DISCOVER. Please NO COD.
BY PHONE or FAX
Complete and date the order form for reference.
Phone Numbers Voice Mail Codes
Toll Free 1-800.328-9350 222 Return Call 301 Product Price List
Local 1-612-429.6742 224 Free Catalog 302 Company FAX and Address
FAX 1-612-429.0563 226 To Order
Hours are 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Central Time. Monday through Friday. The best time to call
is Noon to 5:00 pm Central Time. FAX line and voice mail available 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week. To leave a voice mail message. simply press the - key then enter one of the 3
digit codes listed above. To exit simply hang up. To proceed to another mail box press '
key and the desired 3 digit number.
SALESTAX
•
Minnesota customers please add 6.5% state sales tax.
DELIVERIES
Please provide a street address for all deliveries. Mail and phone orders received, and phone
®
orders receeved by Noon Central Time are usually shipped the same day. Prices include
Whit
B
r
F
O
B
D
li
very terms
.
.
.
e
ea
e
regular shipping charges within the 48 contagious states.
Most
Hawaii or Puerto Rico
ed to Alaska
acka
es shi
00 for
MN
Pl
a
e add $5
L
k
MOPS
.
pp
.
p
g
.
.
a
e,
e
s
shipments are made UPS ground. RPS may be used on occasion. Shipments to Minnesota
or Wisconsin will be sent SPEE DEE unless UPS is specifically requested. Orders over 1000
r
lbs. are palletized and shipped common carrier truck. Next Day or 2nd Day Air service is available.
Additional charges apply. Call for quote.
GOVERNMENTS, BUSINESSES, and PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS
Open account NET 30 billings are available to Governments, Businesses and Property
Owners Associations with established credit. Minimum billing of $100.00. Shipping
charges will be added to NET 30 accounts. New accounts may be established by providing
a bank name and two trade references. Please provide reference name, address, phone
number, bank account number and account name. Allow 5 working days to process
new accounts. Call for credit application.
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION POLICY
Unopened containers may be returned for credit or refund within 30 days of receipt. Please
phone for return authorization. Returned items must be shipped prepaid and are subject to
a 15% restocking charge. Absolutely no credit will be issued for partial returns of chemical
`%i►~-
products not manufactured by AOUACIDE CO.
BULLETIN MAILING LIST
If your address is incorrect. or you are receiving more than one copy of this BULLETIN at the
same address at the same time please send us the address(es) on your BULLETIN(S) with
your instructions regarding changes, corrections, or deletions. We will give you a $5.00
discount on a current or future order for proof of duplicates mailed in 1997 to the
same address at the same time-
SOMEONE YOU KNOW WHO WOULD LIKE A COPY OF OUR BULLETIN
NAME:
- ADDRESS:
CITY:
STATE:.__-_____ _ ZIP:
NAME:-----
ADDRESS:
CITY:----
STATE:-----..__---- ZIP:
L.
~'-l
AOUAC1®E Pellets...
Environmentally sound
The most comprehensive up to date peer review
of all data pertaining to 2,4-D was published by
the,onrnal of American College of Toxi oloav
in 1992. "As tar as the scientific evidence is
concerned 2.4-D should be considered safe for
use in aquatic situations under label directions.
2.4-D is effective. it decomposes easily, it does
not accumulate in living tissue and the most up
to date information indicates that 2.4-D is not a
risk to human health."
r
Effective on many common weeds
As a rule of thumb AQUACIDE Pellets will be
effective on weeds that exhibit a laced or
branched vein structure. AQUACIDE Pellets
will usually not be effective on weeds with
parallel veins (see page 11).
AQUACIDE Pellets are easy to apply. Nothing
to mix or spray. Simply broadcast pellets
uniformly over the water surface with a fanning
motion of the hand. Similar to sewing grass
seed. Effective at any depth.
Apply at the rate of 2.5 lbs. per 1,000 sq. ft. of
lake bottom. For well established perennials
use 4.0 lbs. per 1,000 sq. it.
"1 used your AQUACIDE for the first time this
year it did an excellent job. I'm enclosing
names of two friends who need your products."
J.H., Ohio
"Our beach was so nice to swim when using
AQUACIDE Pellets. No weeds!"
J.P., Michigan
Avoid churning the water in the treatment site
for 72 hours following application. This will help
insure maximum herbicide is available for
absorption by the weeds.
Water treated with AQUACIDE Pellets should
not be used for drinking or irrigation for 21 days
(See page 12).
ACIUACIDE Pellets
10 lb. can
(treats 4,000 sq. It.) 60.95
50 lb. bulk
(treats 0.50 acre) 330.00
4-50 lb. bulk
(treats 0.50 acre ea.) $ 316.00 ea.
(Call for discount on 10 or more 50 lb. bulk.)
J
a'a Aquacide Company. 1627 9th Street, P.O. Box 10748, White Bear Lake. MN 55110-0748
16
r
AQUATH®L Granular
Selective rapid acting contact herbicide.
AOUATHOL Granular with potassium endothol
To apply AOUATHOL Granular, simply broad-
cast the granules unilormly over the water surface
is a selective. rapid-acting, contact herbicide.
Controls submersed weeds in lakes and ponds.
by hand or use a mechanical spreader (see
Works rapidly enough to be effective in both
i
page 24). Heavy infestations should be
treated in sections to avoid oxygen depletion.
n
still and moving water. There is a wide marg
of safety with respect to list'.
"1 am writing this note to tell you I am very
AOUATHOL Granular is a convenient ready-to-
pleased with your product. I am enclosing
use granular product. Granules are slightly
ra
ix or s
hi
t
some pictures to show you the improvement
thank you."
Again
on the lakefront
y.
p
o m
ng
smaller than cat litter. Not
Begins working on contact with submersed weeds
,
.
G. R. J., Florida
to break down cell structure and inhibit protein
synthesis. Without this ability the weed dies.
Water treated with AOUATHOL Granular
Initial results in 1 to 3 days.
should not be used for irrigation, human or
animal consumption for 7 days. Fish from the
Full kill takes place in 1 to 2 weeks. As weeds
treatment site should not be consumed for 3 days
Swimming should not take place for 1 day
die they drop to the bottom and decompose.
(see page 12).
Effective anytime live weeds can be contacted.
Best results occur when applied in spring and
-90
summer, less material is required and a longer
-
weed free period will result. Contact time with
-r
weeds should be at least 2 hours. Although
selective, AOUATHOL Granular is effective
\
on many different weeds (see page 11).
Excellent Pondweed control.
Recommended application rates for
AOUATHOL Granular range from 0.5 to 5.0
ppm. Safe for most fish at 100 ppm or more.
o -7=115
For most Pondweeds growing in lakes 2.0 to
4.0 ppm will give excellent control. This rate is
equivalent to 5 to 10 lbs. per 1000 sq. ft. at an
average depth of 4 ft. Adjust quantity of
material up or down depending on average
depth. At a 6 ft. average depth use 50% more
AQUATHOL Granular
or 7.5 to 15 lbs. per 1000 sq. ft. When treating
an entire pond you can use 25% to 50% less
,
40 Ib. pall
material and still achieve excellent control.
(treats 4,000 to 6,000 sq. ft.).......$ 144.95
Voice: 800-328-9350, 612-429.6742 • FAX: 612.429-0563 0 E-mail: AC,76652.171@CompuServe.com
17
HY®R®TH®L 191 Granular
Selective rapid-acting, contact herbicide & algaecide.
HYDROTHOL 191 Granular with alkylammine
endothal is a selective. rapid-acting, contact
herbicide naSd algaecide. Controls submersed
weeds and algae in lakes. ponds, irrigation
canals, and drainage ditches. Works rapidly
enough to be effective in both still and moving
water. May be harmful to fish at recommended
application rates.
Aquathol with a boost.
The physical form. mode of action, and general
usage of HYDROTHOL 191 Granular are
similar to Aquathol Granular.
Where fish are present application of
HYDROTHOL 191 Granular at rates over 1.0
ppm should be used only for spot treatments,
narrow margins, or where some fish kill is
acceptable. Do not treat more than 10% of a
lake or pond at one time at application rates
above 1.0 ppm.
When treating lakes or ponds with HYDROTHOL
191 Granular begin at the shoreline and work
toward the center. Apply parallel to the shoreline.
This will herd fish away from the treated area
into deeper untreated portions of the
lake or pond.
Treat your entire pond for algae.
As little as 0.2 ppm of HYDROTHOL 191
Granular will control algae when an entire
pond is treated. For longer tern control or spot
treatments use 0.5 to 1.5 ppm. Repeat treatment
when growth reappears. For floating mats scat-
ter uniformly over the surface of the mat.
Weeds growing in lakes or ponds will require
application of 0.5 to 2.5 ppm of HYDROTHOL
191 Granular.
To compute lbs. of material to use for lakes or
ponds multiply the application rate in ppm by 5.
This will give the number of lbs. to use on
1,000 sq. ft. at an average depth of 4 ft. Adjust
quantity of material up or down depending on
average depth.
Heavily infested irrigation canals or drainage
ditches will require 3.0 to 5.0 ppm of
HYDROTHOL 191 Granular.
To compute lbs. of material to use for irrigation
canals or drainage ditches use 1.25 lbs. per
1.000lin. ft., per sq. M. of cross section, per ppm.
For a 2,000 ft. canal, with a cross section of
15 sq. ft., at 3 ppm use:
1.25X2.0X 15X3= 112.5 lbs.
Water treated with HYDROTHOL 191
Granular should not be used for irrigation for
7 days. Human and animal consumption
should be avoided for 7 to 25 days depending
on the application rate. Fish from the treatment
site should not be consumed for 3 days. Swimming
should not take place for 1 day (sea page 12).
` r
1l--
[ r
~i
HYDROTHOL 191 Granular
40 lb. pail
(treats 4,000 to 16,000 sq. n.) $164.95
Aquacide Company. 1627 9th Street. P.O. Box 10748. White Bear Lake, MN 55110-0748
IS
F ~1
CUTMNE-PLUS Lip
Rapid acting hard water stab
CUTRINE-PLUS with copper elhanolamine
complexes is a rapid acting, hard water stable.
contact algaecide. Controls a broad range of
algae in lakes, ponds, fish hatcheries, irrigation
canals, and drainage ditches. Also effective on
Hydrilla, especially in combination with
Weedtrine-D.
Contains no corrosive sulfates.
Far less corrosive and more stable than similar
common algaecides. Water hardness will not
reduce effectiveness. Begins to work on
contact with algae.
Once contact is established, CUTRINE-PLUS
begins to work immediately to break down the
algae's cellular structure and interrupt the
ability to photosynthesize food. Controls
Planktonic Algae in 24 to 48 hours, Filamentous
Algae in 3 to 4 days.
'We have used two gallons of your Cutrine
Plus, and the results were excellent. Thanks.'
J. C. N., Texas
~u.d
e. contact algaecide.
CUTRINE-PLUS may be toxic to Trout or Koi
if carbonate hardness of treated water is less
than 50 ppm. Most surface waters exceed
this limit and pose no threat. If in doubt. use
the WATER HARDNESS TEST KIT on page 20.
To apply determine the volume of water to be
treated in acre-feet. Use 1 gallon of CUTRINE-
PLUS Liquid per 1.5 acre-feet of water. Dilute
with a minimum of 9 parts water. Spray uniformly
over the water surface with a tank sprayer (see
page 24). Allow material to rain down in
coarse droplets for better surface penetration.
Contact with algae will be improved by breaking
apart heavy surface mats before application.
Use Cide Kick II to increase penetration and
contact. Treat heavy infestations in sections to
avoid oxygen depletion.
No water use restrictions.
Water treated with CUTRINE-PLUS Liquid has
no water use restrictions (see page 12).
Use CUTRINE-PLUS Liquid to easily control ~r
surface algae or algae growing within 3 feet of
the surface. Begin application in spring as
water temperature warms to 60'F and above.
Early treatment when growth first appears or
begins to create a nuisance will reduce the
amount of CUTRINE-PLUS Liquid you will
need. Early treatment will also reduce the j
amount of dead growth.
Pond water clear as a bell!
Control will last for several weeks to several
-
months depending on local conditions. Several
CUTRINE•PLUS Liquid
applications will usually be required to maintain
r
R
th
l
l
t
t
1 gallon
rea
as re-g
ow
season
ong contro
.
e
$ 38
50
begins to appear. Allow 1 to 2 weeks
(treats 1.50 acre.feet)
.
between consecutive treatments.
4 X 1 gallon
Heavy out of control growth may require more
(treats 6.00 acre-feet)
$136.50
than one appiiualiun lu ydin uuntrul. For best
results, use under conditions of minimal water
2.5 gallon
flow. Apply early on the morning of a calm,
(treats 7.75 acre-feet)
$ 96.00
sunny day. Contact time should be at least
3 hours.
5 gallon
(treats 7.50 acre.feet)
$172.00
Voice: 800.328-9350. 612-429.6742 • FAX: 612-429-0563 • E-mail: AC,76652.171@CompuServe.com
19
r
F
I
CUTRINE PLUS Granular
Convenient, ready to use, contact algaecide.
CUTRINE-PLUS Granular is a convenient.
ready to use. contact algaecide. Contains the
same active ingredient as Cutrine-Plus Liquid
described on the facing page.
No mixing or spraying
Use CUTRINE-PLUS Granular to easily control
bottom algae or algae growing within 3 feet of the
bottom. Cat litter size granules settle on algae and
immediately begin attacking growth. Ideal for use
on Chara. Makes early season spot treatment of
Filamentous Algae a snap! Early treatment will
help prevent the formation of heavy surface mats.
"Your products (Cutrine Plus) work remarkably
well! Thanks!"
L. J. C., Pennsylvania
For best results, use under conditions of
minimum water flow. Apply early on the
morning of a calm, sunny day. Contact time
should be at least 3 hours.
Control bottom algae all season.
To apply simply broadcast granules uniformly
over the water surface. Use 30 lbs. of CUTRINE-
PLUS Granular per 0.50 acre. Broadcast by
hand or by using a mechanical spreader
(see page 24).
Treat heavy infestations in sections to avoid
oxygen depletion. Chara should be treated in
spring and summer or when weeds are soft and
supple. Mature, established Chara may became
calcified in hard water and very difficult to control.
A single early application will usually control
Chara for an entire season. Bottom growing
Filamentous Algae may require re-treatment for
season long control. There is no minimum
water ternperature recommended for use.
Water treated with CUTRINE-PLUS Granular
has no use restrictions (see page 12).
_ ALE4rL~
CUTRINE-PLUS Granular
10 Ib. box
(treats 7,250 sq. ft.) $ 36.00
4 X 10 Ib. box
(treats 29,000 sq. ft.) 123.00
30 Ib. bag
(treats 0.50 acre) $ 85.00
WATER HARDNESS TEST KIT
Quick, reliable, carbonate hardness determination.
The WATER HARDNESS TEST KIT provides a
quick, reliable, carbonate hardness determination.
Includes powder packs and titration solution for
100 tests, sample tube, mixing jar, carrying
case. and complete instructions.
Test your water softener too.
The WATER HARDNESSTEST KIT should be
used prior to Cutrine-Plus in waters containing
Trout or Kot. Also great for testing tap water
for hardness or your water softener.
r 1~ Y
17-
WATER HARDNESS TEST KIT
(performs too tests) $ 35.95
ek Aquacide Company. 16279th Street. P.O. Box 10748. White Bear Lake. MN 551 1 0 0748
'0
1
■
F
F
-l
®~~R AS Liquid &SRP Granular
Selective root killi - ~temlc he&r ida
SONAR with fluridone is a selective, root killing,er
systemic herbicide. Controls weeds in fresh Ponds, lakes, reservoirs, irrigation canals, and
drainage ditches. Available in both aqueous
suspension and slow release granular form.
Treat your entire pond.
Selective control provides excellent results on
many difficult to control weeds. while allowing
desirable vegetation to remain. Entire ponds
should be treated at one time.
treat - if is necessary to
a minimum of 5
acres. Treating less than 5 acres or treating arrow
strips may not produce satisfactory results due
to dilution. Use SONAR SRP Granular in
lakes to maintain a consistent concentration
and insure maximum results.
Absorbed by leaves and stems directly from
the water and by roots from the hydrosoil. In
susceptible weeds, SONAR inhibits the ability
to produce carotene. Without this ability,
chlorophyll is rapidly degraded by sunlight
and the weed dies.
Visible effects in 7 to 10 days.
Initial results show a bleaching at growing tips
of the weed. Within 7 to 10 days weeds begin
to turn white or pink and decay. Under optimum
conditions full weed kill occurs in 30 to 90 days.
Results occur slowly. SONAR will not cause
oxygen depletion.
For best results, apply in spring and summer
during the early stages of growth. Consistent
concentrations must be maintained for 7 to 10
days following application. Rapid dilution will
reduce effectiveness. SONAR is selective
(seepage 10).
A little goes a long wayl
To apply calculate the volume of water to be
treated in acre-feet. Use 1 pint of SONAR AS
Liquid per 2.5 acre-feet. Dilute with water and
apply uniformly over the surface with a tank
sprayer. Use 8 pounds or SONAR SRP
Granular per 2.0 acre-feet. Simply broadcast
uniformly over the surface by hand or by using
a mechanical spreader (see page 24).
"We've used SONAR for twelve years
have seen no a and
diverse environmental effects.
Most of our treatments end up roviding more
than twelve months of control. JO
M. M., Florida
Water treated with SONAR should not be used
for irrigation for 30 days following treatment
(see page 12).
- 1
SONAR AS Liquid
1 pine
(treats 0.5010 0.75 acre)............ $ 465.00
1 quart
(treats 1.00 10 1.50 acres)
$ 490.00
1 gallon
(treats 4.00 to 6.00 acres)
$1,790.00
SONAR SRP Granular
8 lb. pail
(treats 0.40 to 0.60 acre)...........
. $ 250.00
40 lb. pail
(treats 2.00 to 3.00 acres)
$1 050 0Q
Voice: 800-328.9350, 612-429-6742 a FAX: 612-429-0563 0 ( E-mail: AC,76652.171 @CompuServe.com
1
r ~
AQUACLEAR Pellets
Consume organic material, reduce odor, clear bottom.
AQUACLEAR Pellets will consume organic
material, reduce odor, and clear the bottom.
Contains a blend of 8 strains of bacteria
selected for the ability to consume common
organic materials found in surface waters.
Reduce or eliminate sulfide and methane odor.
Over 400 million hungry bacteria.
Each AQUACLEAR Pellet contains over 400
million hungry bacteria ready to go to work for
you. Visible effects occur in 1 to 2 weeks. Full
clearing requires up to 90 days depending on
the extent of buildup. Result is a firmer bottom.
fewer nutrients and better water quality.
Use AQUACLEAR Pellets in any lake or pond.
For best results apply in spring after water
temperatures warm to 50 F or above.
To apply, simply broadcast AQUACLEAR
Pellets uniformly over the surface. Repeat
weekly at 9 lbs. per 0.50 acre until desired
bottom quality is achieved. Continue monthly
maintenance at 9 lbs. per 1.00 acre.
Water treated with AQUACLEAR Pellets has
no use restrictions (see page 12).
Bacteria in AQUACLEAR Pellets will consume
herbicides. Do not apply at the same time.
Allow 3 weeks following herbicide application
before applying AQUACLEAR Pellets.
ACIUACLEAR Pellets
9 lb. can
(treats 0.50 to 1.00 acre) $ 36.95
45 lb. bulk
(treats 2.50 to 5.00 acres) $143.95
CLEAR-MATER Powdered Alum
Coagulate & settle suspended solids, strip phosphorus.
CLEAR-WATER buffered alum coagulates and
settles suspended solids. Quickly clears your
pond. Removes phosphorus, reducing algae
growth. You will notice an improvement in
water clarity in as little as 24 hours.
Clear up your pond water.
Pour a bucket of pond water through an old T-shirt
or towel. Solids passing through the cloth will be
settled by CLEAR-WATER. Solids remaining on
the cloth must be removed by other means.
Clears turbid, cloudy water of suspended solids.
CLEAR-WATER will settle suspended solids
present at the time of treatment. As additional
material is introduced from sources such as
runoff, re-treatment will be required.
CLEAR-WATER comes in two parts. Apply
part A first, then part B. Do not mix parts A and B.
Each part may be dissolved separately in water
and sprayed over the surface. To be
effective your entire pond should be treated.
Water treated with CLEAR-WATER has no use
restrictions (see page 12).
C 1
CLEAR-WATER
40 ib. pail
(treats 1.00 acre-foot) $ 69.95
A Aquacide Company. 1627 911h Street. P.O. Box 10748. White Bear Lake. MN 55110-0748
22
F 7,
AQUASHA®E & AQUASHADOW
Concentrated dyes filter sunlight & create sparkling blue water.
AQUASHADE Liquid and AOUASHADOW
Dry Pack concentrated dyes filler sunlight and
create sparkling blue water. Controls submersed
weeds and algae in ponds. decorative water
features. and other impounded bodies of water.
Filters sunlight inhibiting photosynthesis. Gives
water a crisp, clear. aqua-blue color.
Sparkling blue pond water.
Use AQUASHADE or AOUASHADOW in
spring and early summer before growth begins.
Less effective control occurs when growth is
within 2 feet of the surface. Shallow water
weeds, algae mats and floating weeds are not
affected. Chemical control or physical
removal of these weeds may be required.
To apply AQUASHADE pour directly into the
water. To apply AOUASHADOW, toss water
soluble packets into water. Dyes disperse within
several hours by natural water movement.
The entire pond volume should be treated. Use
where there is a minimal inflow and outflow of
water. Additional applications will be needed at
1 to 4 week intervals as dyes are broken down
by sunlight.
Use 1 gallon of AQUASHADE or 4 packets of
AOUASHADOW to treat 4.00 acre-feet.
Water treated with AQUASHADE or
AOUASHADOW should not be used in water
designated for human consumption
(see page 12).
AOUASHADE w
1 gallon
(treats 4.00 acre-feel) $ 65.95
4 X 1 gallons
(treats 16.00 acre-feet) ................$236.50
AQUASHADOW
4 packets
(treats 4.00 acre.feet) $ 75.95
4 X 4 packets
(treats 16.00 acre-feet) $27S.00
STARUURS'1 Aerator & Fountain
Adds oxygen circulates water, improves water quality.
The STARBURST will add oxygen, circulate
water, and improve water quality. Made of
stainless steel and high-density plastic. Floats
on the surface. Continuous run 1/2 HP motor
pumps 125 gallons per minute. Power center
with 24 hour timer. GFI and 100 feet of under-
water cable. Complete, detailed instructions.
Tremendous aesthetic appeal.
The STARBURST will raise oxygen levels in
the water, cool surface water and circulate the
entire body of water. Balances your pond and
speeds up the breakdown of organic materiai.
Greatly improves water quality over time.
The STARBURST requires no external pumps
or other fixtures. Easily installed by two people
in about 1 hour. Simply float the unit into
position, anchor it in place and connect to
on-shore electrical service.
Use 1 /2 HP per 114 acre for improving water
quality. Limited 18 month manufacturers warranty
(that's 2 seasons!).
STARBURST Aerator & Fountain
1/2 horse power unit 1450.00
Voice: 800-328-9350. 612-429-6742 • FAX: 612-429-0563 0 E-mail: AC.76652.17l CompuServe.com
'3
~ I
CONSTRUCT® Tank Sprayer
High quality, general purpose, hand held.
The CONSTRUCTO is a high quality, general
purpose, hand field sprayer. Graduated
translucent tank for easy measuring. Easy fill
funnel top reduces spills. Strong steel handle,
reinforced hose, and long brass wand.
Uniform application, uniform control.
Insures uniform results when applying liquid I
products such as Weedtrine-D, Rodeo, Sonar
AS Liquid or Cutrine-Plus Liquid. Place wand
below surface and inject solution to treat
submersed weeds. CONSTRUCTO Sprayer
4.7S gallon capacity $ 58.95
EV-N-SPRED Mechanical Spreader
Commercial quality, shoulder held, hand crank.
The EV-N-SPRED is a commercial quality, y
shoulder held. hand crank spreader. Features a
40 lb. capacity, stainless steel spread pattern
plates, 3 hole drop system, infinite flow settings,
and On,Off control.
Easily treat several acres.
The EV-N-SPRED insures uniform results when
applying granular products such as Cutrine-Plus +
Granular, Aquathol Granular, Sonar SRP Granular,
Hydothol 191 Granular or Clear-Water.
Easily managed by two people from a boat. EV-N-SPRE® Spreader
40 pound capacity 94.95
EZ Hand Held Spreader
Well designed, durable, affordable.
The EZ is a well designed, durable, and
affordable hand held spreader. Features a
10 lb. capacity, rust proof construction, easy
flow adjustment.
Easily handled by one person.
Verv easv to handlo, Great for treating tight
-
'
areas around the dock, boat lift, or raft. Easily
treat up to an acre with granular products. No
EZ Spreader
assembly required.
to lb. capacity $ 16.95
A Aquacide Company, 1627 9th Street, P.O. Box 10748, White Bear Lake. MN 55110-0748
24
~ J
WATER WEED CUTTER*
Lightweight, hand operated underwater weed cutter.
The WATER WEED CUTTER is a lightweight,
hand operated, underwater weed cutter. Designed
for use by a single person. Two 33 inch angled
stainless steel blades cut a 48 inch swath.
Non-blade parts are zinc plated for corrosion
resistance. Includes a sharpener, 20 feet of nylon
rope, and complete instructions.
Great exercise.
To use the WATER WEED CUTTER, simply
throw it into the weed patch. Allow a few seconds
for the cutter to sink. Draw it back slowly in
short jerky motions. Cut weeds pop to the surface
for easy harvesting. Regular sharpening after
each use makes cutting easier. Light oil applied
after use will help maintain the cutter.
Use anytime weeds grow large enough to be
cut. The WATER WEED CUTTER is best suited
to small localized weed patches. Use on heavy
weeds such as cattails is not recommended.
Should not be towed behind a power boat.
Replace blade covers when not in use.
48 inch cutting width /
X66 inch long handle
20 feet nylon rope
WATER WEED CUTTER
with Sharpener 134.9E
ELECTRIC LAKE MOWER*
Battery powered, boat mounted underwater weed cutter
The LAKE MOWER is a battery powered, boat
mounted, underwater weed cutter. Simple, rugged
`it i
design provides years of dependable service.
Allaluminum and stainless steel construction.
Individually replaceable boron steel cutting
blades. Complete detailed instructions.
Easily cuts an acre or more.
The LAKE MOWER cuts a 48 inch wide swath.
Upper and lower collar stops adjust depth of cut
-
from 1 to 4 feet. Tiller style master switch allows
easy rotation of cutter head. Firmly attaches to
_
-
the transom, side or front of the boat. Mounting
bracket allows cutter head to be rotated out of
_
the water for easy cleaning.
The LAKE MOWER will require a boat. a 12 volt
marine battery, and 1 or 2 people to operate.
U
se as _ soon as weeds =r y e targe cnoug., to cut
or become a nuisance. Cuts heavy weeds as
easily as thinner weeds. Be kind to your neigh-
bors, always remove cut weeds from the water.
Limited 12 month manufacturers warranty.
LAKE MOWER 1,040.00
Voice: 800-328-9350. 612-429-6742 • FAX: 612-429-0563 • E-mail: AC,76652.171@CompuServe.com
25
F
BEACHCOMBER LAKE RAKE*
High strength, light weight, flexible plastic teeth.
The BEACHCOMBER LAKE RAKE is a high
strength, light weight rake with flexible plastic
teeth. Hollow, 36 inch rake bar accepts
24-8 inch bolt on teeth. Includes one piece
5-ti2 foot handle, 100 feet of polypropylene
rope, 3 foam floats for surface use, and
complete instructions.
i
36 inches wide ;
Spring action scours the 60ttom.
Spring action of the flexible teeth loosens
settled. compacted bottom debris for easy
1
removal. Use the BEACHCOMBER LAKE
t
5-112 feet lon
RAKE regularly and you will be amazed by
g
the improvement.
t
100 feet
Begin early and continue regularly. Roots will
polypropylene rope
be less developed. Amount of debris to be
removed will be less substantial. Great for
removing cut or dead weeds from the water.
Use the BEACHCOMBER LAKE RAKE several
ways. A two-man drag with one person at each
end. Wading from shore, throwing from a dock
BEACHCOMBER LAKE RAKE
or pulling behind a boat. Weight the hollow
$ 119
95
'
head with small stones or sand for a better
.
"
grip on bottom crud.
Replacement teeth $ 1.95 ea.
!HATER WEED RAKE*
Lightweight extended handle rigid aluminum teeth
The WATER WEED RAKE is a lightweight,
extended handle rake with rigid aluminum teeth. 36 inches wide
Single piece 36 inch head with 36-3 inch teeth.
Includes two-piece extension handle adjustable
from 6 to 10 feet, 20 feet of nylon rope, foam
float for surface use, and complete instructions.
The WATER WEED RAKE is best suited to sandy
Clean up after storms. \IongTo e
bottom areas. Digs out buried stones, sticks,
and other beach debris. Great for beach clean up following storms. use the WATER WEED RAKE, throw it from the shoreline or dock while holding the
rope and then draw back or use it without the
rope while wading.
■ In cases where physical removal of aquatic
weeds Is underttaken lurlgel telln curlcrul
will be achieved herbicide application. WATER WEED RAKE 134.95
For best results herbicides should be applied
after the water clears and the bottom settles.
A Aquacide Company, 1627 9th Street, P.O. Box 10748, White Bear Lake, MN 55110-0748
26
MOSQUITO BEATER
Granular, area wide outdoor mosquito & fly repellent.
MOSQUITO BEATER is a granular, area wide.
outdoor mosquito and fly repellent. Controls
mosquitoes and black flies in gardens, around
patios, greens, nursery displays, cemeteries, and
tennis courts. Almost any outdoor area.
Drive mosquitoes away for days.
MOSQUITO BEATER is a convenient, ready to
use granular product. Begins working within an
hour of application. Vapors from the granules
drive mosquitoes and flies from still air areas.
One treatment is usually effective for 2 days and
may last for up to 8 days. Will not harm flowers,
shrubs, lawns or soil, or stain tile, cement or
stone floors. Great for parties.
Contains no poison. May be used in areas
where children and pets play. Keep un-applied
material away from children and pets.
To apply MOSQUITO BEATER, simply broad-
cast granules from the convenient applicator
canister, or scatter by hand from drum.
MOSQUITO BEATER
4 canisters
(treats 20,000 sq. ft.) $ 48.95
35 Ib. drum
(treats 100,000 sq. ft.) $113.95
MOSQUITO BRIQUETS
Floating, long lasting, B.t.i. mosquito larvicide.
MOSQUITO BRIQUETS are a floating, long
lasting, B.t.i. mosquito larvacide. Controls mos-
quito larvae in old tires, rain barrels, streams,
ponds, ditches. woodland pools, gutters.
and flower pots. Any area where standing
water is present.
Before they develop into biting adults.
Use MOSQUITO BRIQUETS anytime during
the mosquito season. Apply directly to standing
water or in areas where standing water will
develop. May be staked or tied in place with
string. Unused portions which dry out will start
working again when they become wet. Unused
portions remain active indefinitely.
To apply MOSQUITO BRIQUETS, simply toss
them into mosquito breeding areas. Because
they float active material is released at the
surface and gradually settles to the bottom.
Larvae feed on this material and are killed
before they develop into biting adults.
Re-application should be made every 30
days. One briquet will cover 100 square feet.
Partial briquets can be applied to smaller areas.
~4 .
MOSQUITO BRIQUETS
20 each
(treats 2,000 sq. ft.) $ 33.95
5 x 20 each
(treats 10,000 sq. n.) $149.50
Voice: 800-328-9350. 612-429.6742 a FAX: 612-429-0563 OE-mail: AC.76652.171@CompuServe.com
2
7,
-I
r
AQUAGEST Powder
Non-corrosive,- non-toxic, bacterial waste degrader.
AQUAGEST Powder is a non-corrosive.
non-toxic, bacterial waste degrader. The
bacteria in AQUAGEST Powder have been
tested and selected for the ability to consume
common household organic waste. Breaks down
and liquefies fats, grease, and paper products.
Slow, steady, continual action.
Bacteria work slowly but surely. Several hours
may be required to free slow moving drains.
Several days or weeks may be required to
improve a slow moving septic systems.
Use AQUAGEST Powder anywhere an
increase in the rate of natural decay and
reduction of odors is desired.
Reduce solids accumulation.
Plumbing and septic systems will benefit
from regular use of AQUAGEST Powder.
Increases drain field percolation, liquefies tat
and grease, clears pipes. traps, and joints of
built up waste. One scoop in each drain every
other week will keep them clean, free flowing.
and odor free.
Other uses include outdoor toilets, motor
homes, trailers, boats, and compost piles.
The effectiveness of AQUAGEST Powder
increases with temperatures up to 120 F.
Above 120 F. AQUAGEST Powder is
not effective. No appreciable activity can be
expected below 40 F.
To use AQUAGEST Powder simply apply
directly from the container with the scoop
provided. For faster action presoak with water
for 30 minutes and apply.
For slow septic tanks use 1/2 pound for each
500 gallons of septic tank capacity. Repeat
weekly for a total of 4 weeks. Continue every
other month to maintain system.
The ingredients in AQUAGEST Powder
are safe for household use and will not
harm plumbing or fixtures.
1tu~eolr;s`r °f
AQUAGEST Powder
5 Ib. can
(treats 5,000 gallons) $ 44.95
25 Ib. drum
(treats 25,000 gallons) ................$184.95
"In mid February'95 I wrote to AQUACIDE
Co. and requested an unusually large number
°liust wanted to thank AQUACIDE Company
for all your help. My pond has never looked
of AQUACIDE Co. BULLETINS be sent to
me. I have used your products for years
better. It also has never been easier to care
f
Y
and feel truly at ease recommending
AQUACIDE Co.'s environmentally-
or.
our professional stall has been
wonderful and patient in helping me to
id
if
friendly products to everyone and to all the
ent
y my problem weeds and suggesting
the proper product.'
lake /pond associations in Massachusetts. I
hope that AQUACIDE Co. benefits greatly
S.L.B., Florida
from orders placed by new customers. lam
sure they will be pleased with your terdfic
productsl°
W.L.T., Massachusetts
Ck Aquacide Company. 1627 9th Street. P.O. Box 10748. White Bear Lake. MN 55110-0748
28
L
CI: WIII these products harm fish?
A: No. There is a wide margin of safety with
respect to fish and wildlife when these products
are used according to label instructions. Read
Cutrine-Plus and Hydrothol 191 Granular labels
carefully regarding fish cautions. Fish are
generally at greatest risk from oxygen
depletion resulting from decay of dead vegetation.
CI: When should I apply aquatic herbicides?
A: As a general rule, these products should
be applied when weeds are actively growing.
Controlling aquatic weeds usually requires
more effort as the season progresses and
weeds become well established. As weeds
mature, growth slows and systemic herbicides
become less efficient. Mature weeds may
hinder access to the treatment site and when
treatment is done, a greater amount of dead
vegetation will result.
O: Which product works the best?
A: Each product works best in different situations.
The best product for a given weed depends
on several factors; the type of weed, time of
year, area and depth to be treated and the
intended water uses. Contact our representatives
for help in determining the best product for
your situation.
CI: Now long will a treatment last?
A: The length of control will depend on the
product used, weed treated and local conditions.
Systemic herbicides will provide longer term
results than contact herbicides. Slow growing
weeds will take longer to re-develop than rapidly
growing weeds. Treating an entire body of water
will provide longer term control than treating a
small section of a larger body of water.
C: Why both granular and liquid products?
A: Granular products are used to control bottom
growing or rooted weeds and algae. Liquid
products are used to control weeds and algae
which are at or near the surface or have easily
accessible foliage.
O: Is mud a problem?
A: The effectiveness of chemical control is
reduced in muddy or turbid waters. Liquid
herbicides are not absorbed well by mud
covered foliage. Heavy clay, silt or mud will
reduce the effectiveness of granular or pelletized
herbicides. Aquaclear Pellets and Clear-
Water will help solve these problems.
CI: Do I need a permit?
A: Control of weeds in state protected waters
often requires a permit. Consult your State
Fish and Game Agency before beginning any
control operations.
CI: What are syrtamic and contact herbicides?
A: Systemic herbicides are absorbed by
weeds, move throughout the weed and kill
the entire weed including roots. Success-
ful systemic treatments require consistent
presence of herbicide for absorption and longer
periods of time to work. Most circumstances
require only one treatment per season. Contact
herbicides kill only those parts of the weed
with which they are brought into contact. Once
contact is established, contact herbicides begin
to work quickly and require less time to
show results. More than one treatment may
be necessary for season long control.
O: Can I treat my entire pond?
A: Best results are achieved by treating an
entire pond. This reduces the likelihood that
untreated areas will encroach on treated areas.
Treatment of an entire pond should be done
in sections. Treat one third to one half at a
time and allow seven to ten days between
treatments. This will reduce the possibility of
fish suffocation due to oxygen depletion from
decomposition of dead weeds. This is of
greatest concern when using rapid-acting
contact herbicides and algaecides on well
developed weed beds and algae mats.
Q: What water temperature is best?
A: Generally chemicals will be more highly
activated and effective at warmer temperatures.
Warm temperatures also help insure active
weed growth which is necessary for best results.
A specific temperature is recommended for
use it will be specified on the product label.
O: Don't fish need weeds to produce oxygen?
A: Weeds do produce oxygen, but not nearly
as much as is stirred into the water from the
atmoshere. Heavy surface mats of vegetation
may even reduce the oxygen available to fish
by sealing the surface.
Cl: How can 1 contact Aquacide Company?
A: You can reach us at:
Voice: 800-328-9350, 612-429-6742
FAX: 612-429-0563
E-mail: AC,76652.171@CompuServe.com
Voice: 800-328-9350, 612.429.6742 0 FAX: 612-429-0563 0 E-mail: AC,76652.171 @CompuServe.com
29
7.
BY MAIL
Simply complete the order form in the center of this catalog or make your own. Include both your
mailing and shipping addresses if different. Please provide a physical street address for delivery.
Total all charges and enclose payment of a check, money order, or charge card information
(including expiration date). We can accept VISA, MASTER CARD, or DISCOVER. Please NO COD.
BY PHONE, FAX, or E-MAIL
Please complete the order form and date it for your reference.
Phone Numbers Voice Mail Codes -
Toll Free 1.800-328.9350 222 Return Call 301 Product Price List
Local 1-612-429-6742 224 Free Catalog 302 Company FAX and Address
FAX 1.612-429.0563 226 To Order
E-mail AC,76652.171@Compuserve.com
Hours are 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Central Time, Monday through Friday. The best time to call is
Noon to 5:00 pm Central Time. FAX line and voice mail available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
To leave a voice mail message, simply press the ' key then enter one of the 3 digit erodes listed
above. To exit simply hang up. To proceed to another mail box press the • key and desired 3 digit code.
SALES TAX
Minnesota customers please add 6.5% state sales tax.
DELIVERIES
Please provide a street address for all deliveries. Mail and phone orders received by Noon Central Time
are usually shipped the same day. Prices include regular shipping charges within the 48 contiguous states.
Delivery terms F.O.B. White Bear Lake, MN. Please add $5.00 per package shipped to Alaska. Hawaii
or Puerto Rico. Most shipments are made UPS ground, RPS may be used on occasion . Shipments to
Minnesota or Wisconsin will be sent SPEE DEE unless UPS is specifically requested. Orders over
1.000 lbs. are palletized and shipped common carrier truck. Next Day or 2nd Day Air service is
available on most products. Additional charges apply. Call for a quote.
GOVERNMENTS, BUSINESSES, and PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS
Open account NET 30 billings are available to Governments. Businesses, and Property Owners Associations
with established credit. Minimum billing of $100.00. Shipping will be added to all NET 30 accounts. New
accounts may be established by providing a bank name and two trade references. Please provide
reference name, address, phone number, bank account number, and account name. Please
allow 5 working days to process new accounts. Call for credit application. -
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION POLICY
Unopened containers may be returned for credit or refund within 30 days of receipt. Please phone -
for return authorization. Returned items must be shipped prepaid and are subject to a 15% restocking
charge. Absolutely no credit will be issued for partial returns of chemical products not manufactured by
AOUACIDE CO.
BULLETIN MAILING LIST
If your address is incorrect, or you are receiving more than one copy of this BULLETIN at the same address at the
same time please send us the address(es) on your BULLETIN(S) with your instructions regarding
changes, corrections. or deletions. We will give you a $5.00 discount on a current or future order for
proof of duplicates mailed in 1997 to the same.address_at the samot Ime,
Ode -
Aquacide Pellets
15-16
Eouioment.......
Pn ~~-~a
Nyuaciear Pellets
22
.
Hydrothol 191 Granular.....
-
18
Aquagest Powder
28
Mosquito Beater
.
27
Aquashade!Aquashadow
23
Mosquito Briquets
27
Aquathol Granular
17
Rodeo
.
14
Cide Kick ll
14
Sonar
21
Clear Water
22
Weedirine-D
13
Cutrine Plus
19-20
6% Aquacide Company, 1627 91h Street, P.O. Box 10748• White Bear Lake, MN 551100748
30
m
L
any 016e3
PIeB
N
_
65
v
PH
EN131
J8110
40
sm
1
J a~ Z
a
N
J
CL
z
a
v o
{q W ~ d
~dfvA~
m
in
v
a
w
z -
~ L G % G
U -
J 4 _
J r
Q~ A
W - fL
JURJ _
-
m¢N
0 -ir -Z
❑ U
x
ro
rI W W -
r
x
G
ij
n r
r e
a P'Ij -
mJru-
J.TriF- -
r
T
O
- ~
d
= a,
AGENDA ITEM # r
For Agenda of June 24, 1997
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE State Revenue Sharing and State Shared Revenues
PREPARED BY: Wayne LowryDEPT HEAD OK I: CITY ADMIN OK wt G^L- _
ISSUE B F R THE O TN 1
Shall the City Council approve an Ordinance declaring the City's election to receive state revenues and shall the
Tigard City Council approve a resolution certifying that it provides certain services making it eligible to receive
state shared revenues.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the approval of the attached ordinance and resolution.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
State Revenue Sharing
The City has estimated the receipt of $175,000 of state revenue sharing in the 1997/98 budget. Such funds are
JJ vailable from the state for those cities that meet the requirements. The requirements include a public hearing
J efore the budget committee and a public hearing before the City Council. The hearing before the budget
( committee was held April 1, 1997. Approval of the attached ordinance will meet the states requirement for the
City's election to receive these revenues.
State Shared Revenues
The City has estimated the receipt of the following state shared revenues in 1997/98:
Cigarette Tax $ 94,248
1 Liquor Tax $ 265,914
j State Gas Tax $1,907,000
The state requires the City to certify its eligibility to receive these revenues by stating that it provides more than
j four of the services listed in ORS 221.760. The City does provide a sufficient number of required services and is
t"eref rc eligible for such revenues. Approval of the attached resolution will meet the state requirement of
certification.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Remove these revenues from the budget.
FISCAL NOTES
Approval of the ordinance and resolution secures $535,162 of revenue in the general fund and $1,907,000 in the
date gas tax fund.
AGENDA ITEM # ( D
For Agenda of June 24, 1997
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE 1997/98 Budgei Adoption
PREPARED BY: Wayne DEPT HEAD OK J)7V"- CITY ADMIN OK r'~
ISSi E BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Local budget law requires that a budget for the ensuing fiscal year be adopted prior to July 1 by the governing
body, after approval by the budget committee and after a public hearing has been held before the City Council.
Staff recommends approval of the Resolution which includes the Budget Committee recommendations.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City of Tigard budget committee reviewed the 1997/98 proposed budget as submitted by the Budget Officer.
The Budget Committee completed their review on May 23, 1997 with approval of the budget proposal as amended
by the committee in the total amount of $40,375,702. The committee's changes to the proposed budget are
0 flected in Exhibit "A" of the attached resolution.
The resolution to adopt the budget includes references to the OPEU and the TPOA labor agreements which
stipulate cost of living adjustments effective July 1, 1997. The resolution also establishes the cost of living
adjustment for non represented employees at 3% effective July 1, 1997.
Local budget law gives the governing body the authority to make certain changes to the budget committee
recommendation prior to adoption of the budget. The Council may adjust budget resources up or down and may
increase or decrease expenditures. Increases in expenditures are limited to 10% of the published total in each fund.
j No adjustments by the City Council prior to adoption are recommended.
n-rTJVD AT TFIJNIATIVES CONS!nPT?PII
If the Council wishes to adopt the budget as recommended by the budget committee with no changes, the attached
resolution should be approved.
FISCAL NOTES
The budget as approved by the budget committee provides appropriations of $40,375,702.
The recommendation includes the levy of property taxes in the amount of $8,544,147. Measure 50 is expected to
reduce property tax collections by an estimated $1,400,000.
. s
CITY
COUNCIL
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Finalize formatioi
PREPARED BY: _Greg Berry DEPT
IS U
Finalize the formation of Reimbursement Dist
i
STAF
Approve, by motion, the final formation of Re
Engineer's Report.
INFC
ouncil approved the formation of the Districl
the improvements has been completed. The
unchanged from the expected cost in the Engit
Report are proposed.
1
This requested approval will permit connectioi
OTHER AL
Direct that the Engineer's Report be modified.
T his liruject is funded by the Neighborhood Sc
j
!
1
i:icitc%vidc\sumVd9-ccss'.doc
AGENDA ITEM # /
FOR AGENDA OF June 24. 1997
TIGARD, OREGON
ENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Sanitary Se
er Reimbursement District No. 9
w
,D OK a W'``1---CITY MGR OK Lt nA~~
=ORE THE COUNCIL
No. 9
'e
COMMENDATION
C
ursement District No. 9 without modification to the
f
I
ATION SUMMARY
Resolution 97-15 on April 22, 1997. Since then, construction
i1 cost of the project is $130,670.56. This amount is
s Report. Consequently, no revisions to the Engineer's
the sewer and payment of the reimbursement fee.
:NATIVES CONSIDERED
L.
;CAL NOTES
Extension Program in the 1996 - `97 budget year.
AGENDA ITEM 9 (3
FOR AGENDA OF June 24. 1997
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE
PREPARED BY: A.P. D
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Pz~
DEPT HEAD OK A.P. Dumas CITY MGR OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Adoption of the 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program and approval of the 1997-98 projects.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, adopt the 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program as
proposed in Appendices A through E of the attached memorandum dated June 12, 1997.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
~ttached is a memorandum outlining the 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program. This memorandum presents '
to recommended projects for 1997-98 and a tentative list of projects for the following six years. The 1997-98
i Capital Improvement Program was submitted to Planning Commission on May 22, 1997. At its meeting on June
2, 1997, Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed program without modifications. The I
i only modification to the document approved by Planning Commission was a minor adjustment in one of the
budgeted project amounts to conform to the Finance Director's most recent CIP funding projections for next
I fiscal year.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Adopt the proposed Capital Improvement Program with modifications.
FISCAL NOTES i
The 1997-98 CIP project amounts are based on the Finance Director's CIP funding projections for Fiscal Year
1997-98. The approved budget numbers are included with the attached memotandum as Appendix 1.
1 I. ICITYWID&SUM197-99CIP. DOC
1
V
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: City Council y rF '
FROM: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: June 12, 1997
SUBJECT: 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program
This document presents the proposed 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for review
and approval. The Planning Commission approved the 1997-98 CIP with no modifications
during its meeting of June 2, 1997.
Background
The long-term Capital Improvement Program, initially adopted by the City Council on August
23, 1994, identified projects for the 1994-95 CIP Program and proposed a list of projects for the
next 6-year period. The Capital Improvement Program includes improvements to the streets,
storm drainage, sanitary sewer, water and parks systems. The street, storm drainage, and sanitary
10 sewer CIP's are managed by the Engineering Department. The Water System CIP is managed by
the Public Works Department, and the Parks CIP is managed jointly by the Planning and
Engineering Departments.
The Capital Improvement Program is updated each year, and is reviewed and approved by the
City Council. The CIP formulation is separate from the yearly operating budget process but is
approved on the same fiscal year basis as the operating budget. While the program lists projects
for subsequent fiscal years, the projects shown are tentative and are subject to change during the
formulation process for each specific budget year. The CIP, through the adoption process,
therefore establishes the budget for each fiscal year and serves as a planning document to guide
the infrastructure improvements over the following 6 years. During each budget year's update,
the revenue estimates are adjusted, the project cost estimates are reviewed. and the program and
project priorities are re-evaluated based on changes in City plans, citizen input, and additional
data which may become available. The 1996-97 CIP listed a 6-year program; the 1997-98 CIP
returns to the 7-year period originally established in 1994.
Process -
The Capital Improvement Program update process begins with citizen involvement through the
Citizen Involvement Teams. An overview of the CIP process is presented to the CIT's, usually
early in the calendar year so that the entire process can be completed and the annual CIP budget
111 ~ _ _ _
Memorandum to City Council
1997-98 Capital Improvement Program
Page 2
submitted to and approved by City Council prior to the beginning of the next fiscal year (July 1).
This overview was presented during the March CIT meetings this year. The joint CIT meeting in
April provided the CIT members with the opportunity to provide input into the process and to
nominate projects for evaluation and possible inclusion into the program.
The Planning Commission review typically provides another opportunity for public comment on
the proposed plan. After review by the Planning Commission, the plan with subsequent
modifications, if any, is submitted, with Commission recommendation, to the City Council for
review and approval. Council may make additional modifications to the plan during its review
and approval process. The approved plan would be the approved Capital Improvement Program
for the next fiscal year.
The following summarizes the program update for the 1997-98 budget year. Any changes to the
program since Planning Commission approval have been in revisions to the budgeted amounts
based on updated funding projections from the Director of Finance (See Appendix 1). It is
important to note that each funding source has restrictions on the types of projects that can be
constructed. Projects cannot be moved from one finding source to another. Committed projects
are those projects that have been previously approved for 96/97 funding, but have not been
completed as of June 30, 1997. The specific lists of projects are contained in the appendices
associated with each of the program areas.
1997-98 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
STREET SYSTEM PROGRAM
The following are the street projects proposed for 1997-98. A complete listing of the projects and
the full 7-year program is attached as Appendix A.
Recommended Streets (Gas Tax) Projects
I
The vas tax revenue can be used for upgrading the collector and local streets within Tigard,
without restriction. However, this revenue is limited and is not sufficient to fund all the street
improvement needs of the City. The total State Gas Tax amount shown for the 97/98 fiscal year
is based on current budgetary projections, which anticipate additional revenue in the coming
years. If the actual revenues fall short of the anticipated amounts, the projects will be scaled back
to conform to the actual funds received. There were numerous major street projects implemented
during FY 1996-97, which expended practically all the gas tax funds available for that fiscal
j year. There are only a few projects that require carry over funding, and those projects are at or
1 nearing completion as of June 30, 1997.
I:
i i
i
4
r~
Memorandum to City Council
1997-98 Capital Improvement Program
Page 3
The following is a brief description of the projects recommended for Gas Tax Funding next year:
i
• Committed Projects: These are projects that have been already
committed and are nearing completion. As mentioned
previously, most of the gas tax projects for FY 1996-97 were
implemented during FY 96-97. The Pavement Major
Maintenance Program included overlays of 135th Avenue,
paving of gravel streets such as Alfred Street and 74th Avenue,
overlay of Cascade Boulevard, and digouts on Greenburg Road
and Tiedeman Avenue. Other major projects included
reconstruction of both ends of Main Street, and Commercial
j Street, and the traffic signalization of 79th Avenue/Durham
I Road intersection. The carry over obligations into the new
fiscal year are for the 79th Avenue/Durham Road Signal, the
79th Avenue preliminary design, and the Speed Hump
Program Project.
• Pavement Major 1faintenance Program (PMA4P) - This is a
program of corrective and preventative maintenance on all the
paved streets in Tigard. It addresses those streets that can still
benefit from corrective or preventative action. Those streets
that cannot be rejuvenated through this program are eligible for
reconstruction. There is currently a backlog of $1,500,000 in
corrective overlays, repairs, and slurry seals. The pavement
overlay and repair backlog alone is close to $1,300,000. Streets
that are candidates for slurry seals likewise are a priority for
{ preventative treatment. Projects for this program will be drawn
from the Pavement Overlay Backlog list (Appendix G), and
from evaluation of those streets that need slurry seals to extend
the pavement life expectancy. This program category has been
increased from the 1996-97 CIP amount in an attempt to more
rapidly reduce the current backlog.
• The Speed Hump Program -This program provides funding for
installation of speed humps on streets that have clearly
demonstrated the need for installation of these traffic calming
devices. The program for 1996-97 included 128th Avenue, the
section of North Dakota Street between 115th and 121st
Avenue, and a section of Locust Street. The program for FY
1997-98 will include $45,000 in City-funded projects plus
$ 30,000
$ 500,000
$ 60,000
i
I
i
i
Memorandum to City Council
1997-98 Capital Improvement Program
Page 4
$15,000 on a 50-50 cost sharing basis with residents who wish
to participate in the program. -
• Traffic Studies - This program will complete the Transportation $ 50,000
System Plan by reviewing the various studies already
performed and consolidating them for future implementation.
In addition, the funds under this program will be used to assist
in the development of comprehensive public street plans. }
1-"
• Pedestrian Improvements - Grant Avenue: This project will $ 30,000
provide a pedestrian path along Grant Avenue connecting the
existing walkway along Park Street with School Street and
providing pedestrian access to C.F. Tigard Elementary School. {
The initial proposed pedestrian walkway project was Park
Street from Watkins Street to 110th Avenue. However, public
input during the CIT joint meeting for projects is that the
drainage problem needs to be resolved, and a pedestrian
pathway would be undesirable since it would encourage I
speeding on this street. The drainage project for Park Street is
included under the Storm Drainage Program. ,
• 791h Avenue - Design and Rights of Way: The initial design of $ 137,900
this project has been performed inhouse by City Engineering
staff. This project will provide funding for selection of an i
engineering consultant firm to complete the design of the entire
street from Durham Road to Bonita Road. The scope of the
project will include examination of the rights-of-way
requirements for the project, both for street expansion and
storm drainage. It will also identify the funding requirements
for rights-of-way, storm drainage and street improvements, and
initiate the rights-of-way acquisition to the extent that finding
allows.
Recommended Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Projects
TIF Funding can be used only for highway and transit capital improvements which provide
additional capacity to major transportation systems. This funding is limited to major collector i
and arterial streets, and 50% must be spent on arterial streets. A major portion of these funds are I
being held in reserve until our transportation planning is completed. The Tigard Triangle area
will need major improvements to develop streets to arterial and major collector standards. In f j
Memorandum to City Council
1997-98 Capital Improvement Program
Page 5
addition, as the Walnut Island area is annexed, TIF funding will be required to improve 121st
Avenue, Gaarde Street and Walnut Street. The TIF reserve is currently large, and will grow even
larger in the out years as shown in Appendix A. This increase in the reserve will most likely not
occur as major projects are initiated and implemented once the transportation plan is completed.
Significant drawdowns of the reserve amounts are expected in the next several years. j
The TIF-funded projects that are proposed for the next CIP Budget Year are as follows:
• Green burg RoncUMapleleaj Interseclinra: This project is $ 50,000
Federally funded, and the City's share of the project cost is r
10.275%. The improvements to this intersection are necessary
for additional capacity and safety. The project is being C
combined with a MSTIP 2-funded project to widen the
Greenburg/217 Overpass and improve Greenburg Road past
the Washington Square Drive intersection. This project was
included in the FY 1996-97 CIP Budget, but funds were not
expended since the design of the project is still being
performed by ODOT. The project design is expected to be
completed by September 1997, and advertisement for bids is
expected to follow shortly afterwards.
• Bonita Road from the Railroad "Tracks to the Famro Creek $ 800,000
Bridge: This project completes the segment of Bonita Road
3
(between Hall Boulevard and 72nd Avenue) that has not been
improved. It includes widening of the roadway to provide
walkways on both sides and upgrades the at-grade railroad
crossing on Bonita Road. This project was originally deferred
because there was a strong possibility that the two existing
tracks would be consolidated into one. Since it is now apparent
that this consolidation will not occur, there is no need to delay i
i implementation of this project. The project includes land
acquisition to accommodate the widening, design and ;
construction of concrete railroad crossin&s at the two railroad
tracks, installation of a complete highway grade crossing signal
system on the widened street, and underground installation of
overhead utilities in that portion of road.
1 • Wahrrd Street/Tiedenran Avenue Intersection Realignment and $ 80,000
Signalization (Design): This project is to design the
realignment of the existing WalnuUTiedeman/Fonner Street
t
t
1
,
1
Memorandum to City Council
1997-98 Capital Improvement Program
i Page G
1
intersection to correct a dog-leg configuration. It would include
the approaches on each street and signalization of the realigned
intersection to provide efficient traffic flow-. Property on the
southwest comer of the intersection was acquired on a 50-50
shared cost basis with Washington County to accommodate the
realignment. Although this portion of Walnut Street is in the
County, the project is necessary to correct a serious existing
traffic problem in the heart of the City.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Projects
C r
A segment of 91st Avenue has been approved for CDBG funding effective July 1, 1997. The
project encompasses that segment of 91 st Avenue between Greenburg Road and Lincoln Street.
The existing street is substandard in width and is in poor condition. Sidewalks, streetlights and
storm drainage facilities are substandard or lacking. These conditions create a safety problem for
the many children walking to and from the school bus stop located at the intersection of 91st
Avenue and Greenburg Road. The scope of this project is widening of the existing street to
standard width and construction of sidewalks, curbs, streetlights and storm drainage
improvements. Sidewalk construction will include handicapped access ramps. The improved
f
ili
i
i
i
ac
t
es w
ll enhance pedestrian and vehicular safety.
The total project cost is $190,000, with $166,800 in CDBG funding and $23,200 in City funding
and in-kind contribution.
PARKS SYSTEM PROGRAM
I
r
Attached as Appendix B is the parks component of the city's seven-year CIP, which begins July
1997. The plan is an update of the six-year CIP put together in 1996.
i
i
Revenue sources for park CIP's are varied and include Park System Development Charges
(SDC's), local and regional share Greenspaces bond measure funds, park levy funds, and donated
funds. The donated funds include a recent $100,0000 park bequest from a former Tigard resident
and a pr9posed monetary and in-kind contribution from local youth sports leagues toward the
cost of acquiring land and improving Cook Park. The Tualatin River pedestrian bridge is a
potential opportunity for joint action with the City of Tualatin and Washington County.
1
Unfortunately, among the eight projects authorized for funding in 1996-97, only one was
,
completed. This lone project was the acquisition of the three-acre Fern Street Greenspace. Two
d projects, the North Dakota/Tigard trail connection and Cook Park Expansion, were delayed and
' are included as committed projects in the 1997-98 list. Two projects, the Bond Street and Cook
( Park Greens
ace ac
uisitio
d
d
`
p
q
ns, were
roppe
because the purchase prices were not within the
i
v
J
Memorandum to City Council
1997-98 Capital Improvement Program
page 7
established budgets for the projects. One
project, the Bull Mountain Road Greenspace
acquison, was abandoned due to the prior sale of the land for development. Lastly, one project,
the Englewood-Fanno Creek park connection, was abandoned because the owners of the land
targeted for acquisition were unwilling to sell to the city.
New projects in the proposed plan include several greenway trail segments. The Cook
Park/railroad tracks trail is a segment of the Tualatin River main stem trail. The Cook Park/85th
Avenue trail is an off shoot of this main stem trail. The Hall/Bonita Road trail and the
Bonita/Durham Road trail are segments of the Fanno Creek main stem trail. Several offshoots to
this main stem trail are identified. These include two Bonita/Durham neighborhood connections,
two Hall/Bonita Road neighborhood connections, and the Woodard Park/Walnut Street trail
connection. Information on the alignments and costs of these trail segments was provided by the
recently completed Fanno Creek Trail Study. It is important to note that the construction costs of
these connecting trails reflect the cost of a hard surface trail. Where conditions permit, these
estimated costs may be reduced by the replacement of hard surface by a crushed rock surface.
The unidentified local and regional Greenspace projects primarily include the acquisition of
right-of-way for the various trail segments.
The only parks project nominated during the CIT review period was the replacement of the older
play structure in Woodard Park. In response to this request, funding for this project has been
added to the 1997-98 project list.
i
3
J
i
t
f
l
f!
1
V
A major unknown in putting together the parks CIP is the extent, timing, and cost of the Cook
Park expansion. A park master plan with cost estimates is scheduled for completion in mid-1997.
For present purposes, estimated amounts have been included in the parks CIP to reserve funds for
this project.
As indicated in the CIP Overview section, 1998-2003 year projects are only a tentative list. In
regard to this, the updating of the city parks master plan is scheduled to occur in 1997. The
updating work program will look at the long range needs of the community, identify future park
sites, establish priorities for development, and recommend funding strategies to implement the
plan. Ample opportunities will be available for citizen involvement as the parks plan is
developed. Beginning in 1998, revisions to the parks CIP priorities will be developed within the
framework of this new parks plan.
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PROGRAM
The sanitary sewer funding has funding sources that are reserved for maintenance repairs on
currently unknown projects, capacity upgrades as recommended from the USA Master Plan, and
for the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program. The unrestricted portion of the Sanitary Sewer
Memorandum to City Council
1997-98 Capital Improvement Program
Page 8
I Fund can be used for repair and maintenance projects Citywide and for extension of the existing
system to unsewered areas. The detailed project listing for 1997-98 and the fill 7-year program is
1 attached as Appendix C.
i
The two projects that are proposed at this time for the Sanitary Sewer Funding are as follows:
• Neighborhood Setiver Extension Program: This program has $ 500,000
been successfully implemented in the 1996-97 CIP Budget
Year. A sewer extension project on Tigard Street was
completed in the fall of 1996, and the Fairhaven Sewer
Extension Project is currently in the final stages of
construction. We propose to budget for this program on a
continuing basis each Fiscal Year. There are several areas that
have expressed interest in participating in the program for next
year, and we anticipate that at least one or two will materialize
during the year.
• Sanitary Sewer Major ji'faintenance Program: This program $ 40,000
was established at $30,000 midway through FY 1996-97.
These funds would be used to contract out sewer repair
projects that are beyond the repair capabilities of the Public
Works Department. This program is expected to be a
continuing program in future years.
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PROGRAM
The storm drainage funding has the same mix of sources as the sanitary sewer fund. The funding
is generally reserved for currently unknown small projects that come up during the year. Funding
from the new SDC's must be used on projects designated on the USA Master Plan. The detailed
project listing is attached as Appendix D. The projects currently proposed for CIP Budget Year
1997-98 are as follows:
• Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program: This program $ 40,000
addresses minor storm drainage problems requiring more than
normal maintenance effort. These problems would be resolved
through preparation of project bid packages that would go
through the bid process for construction by licensed
construction contractors. The program was established in
previous years, but was not initially funded in FY 1996-97.
The program was re-established in mid-FY 1996-97 in the
amount of $40,000 to resolve minor drainage problems
i
throughout the City. One project was bid out and completed to
date with several others pending design and implementation.
This program is proposed to continue at the same funding level
for CIP Budget Year 1997-98, and for the years beyond that.
• Park Street Drainage: This project would provide an
underground drainage system to resolve the serious drainage
problems on Park Street between Watkins Street and I IOth
Avenue. The project for Park Street initially was for a
pedestrian walkway. Citizen input through the CIP formulation
process resulted in cancellation of the pedestrian aspect of the
project and initiation of a storm drainage project for that
segment of street.
• 118th CT Erosion Control Project: This project would extend
the erosion control measures recently installed on the creek
downstream of 118th CT. The project would extend the
improvements further downstream to alleviate the heavy
erosion on the sideslopes and stream bed, and to protect the
sanitary sewer line which lies immediately adjacent to the
t stream bed.
$ 95,000
$ 30,000
i
WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM
The Water System Projects and funding are decided by the Maintenance Services Department,
with the approval of the Intergovernmental Water Board. The list of water system projects is
attached as Appendix E.
OTHER DOCUMENTS
Other relevant documents are attached as follows:
• Appendix F: 1996-97 Capital Improvement Program
• Appendix G: Pavement Overlay Backlog
Capital Improvement Program Update dated jVfcry 1, 1997
,Vemoranduni from Finance Director dared June 2, 1997
transmitting approved budget numbers
STREET SYSTEM PROGRAM
Major Maintenance
1
APPENDIX A
PROJECT
TIF
GAS TAX
OTHER FUNDING
Committed Projects
79th/Durham traffic signal
5,000
79th Ave. preliminary design
5,000
Speed Hump Program
20,000
TOTAL Committed Projects
30,000
FY 1997-98
Committed Projects
30,000
TIF Transit reserve
70,000
TIF reserve
2,500,000
Pavement Major Maintenance
500,000
Speed Hump Program
60,000
Ped. Improvements - Grant Ave.
30,000
Traffic Studies
50,000
Bonita Road - RR Tracks to Bridge
800,000
Greenburg/Mapleleaf intersection
50,000
Walnut Street/Tledeman Avenue
80,000
Intersection & Approaches (Design
for Realignment and Signalization)
79th Avenue (Design and R/W)
137,900
91st Avenue Improvements from
190,000 (166,800 CDBG
Greenburg Road to Lincoln Street
funds, 23,200 City funds)
Totals for FY 1997-98
3,500,000
807,900
190,000
FY 1998-99
TIF transit reserve
54,000
TIF reserve
2,706,000
Pavement Major Maintenance
300,000
Pedestrian improvements
50,000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
Burnham/Main Signal
40,000
80,000
North Dakota Bridge Replacement
105,000
(design & r/w)
Walnut/Tiedeman Int. Construction
800,000
79th Avenue (R/W and Construction)
LID and Storm Drain Funds
Totals for FY 1998-99
3,600,000
580,000
FY 1999-2000
TIF transit reserve
45,000
TIF reserve
3,755,000
P
avement Ma
300,000
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
i
i
i
i
PROJECT
TIF
GAS TAX
OTHER FUNDING
Pedestrian improvements
50,000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
North Dakota Bridge Replacement
195,000
Totals for FY 1999-00
3,800,000
590,000
FY 2000-01
TIF transit reserve
35,000
TIF reserve
4,815,000
Pavement Major Maintenance
300,000
Pedestrian improvements
50,000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
North Dakota Bridge Replacement
155,000
295,000 (Water Quantity)
Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins (design)
50,000
Totals for FY 2000-01
4,850,000
600,000
FY 2001-02
TIF transit reserve
40,000
fIF reserve
5,860,000
Pavement Major Maintenance
300,000
Pedestrian improvements
50,000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
Hal l/Hunziker/Scoff ins
216,000
Totals for FY 2001-02
5,900,000
611,000
FY 2002-03
TIF transit reserve
40,000
"fIF reserve
6,920,000
Pavement Major Maintenance
300,000
Pedestrian improvements
50,000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins
227,000
Totals for FY 2002-03
6,960,000
622,000
FY 2003-2004
TIF transit reserve
40,000
TIF reserve
7,960,000
Pavement Major Maintenance
300,000
Pedestrian improvements
50,000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
Hall/Hunziker/Scof(ins
238,000
Totals for FY 2003-2004
8,000,000
633,000
-
YARKS SYSTEM PRO
GRAM
PROJECTS
METRO
TIGARD
PARK
PARK SUC
DONATIC-
GRNSP
GRNSP
LEVY
FY 1997-98
i. Cook Park expansion
500,000
100,000
2. Tual River prop acquistion
45,000
3. Woodard Park expansion
200,000
4. Woodard Park Play Structure
60,000
s. N. Dakota/Tigard St trail
17,000
33,000
6. Tigard St/Fowler Sch trail
125,000
2. Fowler Sch/Woodard Pk trail
42,000
8. Woodard Pk/Grant Ave trail
50,000
25,000
55,000
9. Ash Ave/ Fanno Creek trail
30,000
io. Parks Master Plan
42,000
i i. Unidentified Grp acquitions
550,000
285,000
Totals for FY 1997-98
645,000
310,000
17,000
1,087,000
100,000
FY 1998-99
12. Cook Park expansion
350,000
13. Woodard Park improvements
30,000
14. Grant Ave/Main St trail
20,000
20,000
15. Fanno Creek park trail lighting
40,000
16. Englewood Pk basketball court
15,000
17. Unidentified Grp acquisitions
500,000
323,000
Totals for FY 1997-98
520,000
323,000
455,000
FY 1999-00
C
18.
ook Pk/85th Ave trail const
100,000
19. Cook Park/RR tracks trail const
80,000
2o. Hall/Bonita Rd trail const
236,000
Total for FY 1999-00
416,000
FY 2000-01
B
i
21.
on
ta Rd/Durham trail
415,000
Total for FY 2000-01
415,000
FY 2001-02
T
l
22.
ua
R/85th Ave trail const
W
d
120,000
23.
oo
ard Pk/Walnut St trail
W
d
105 000
24.
oo
ard Pk/Johnson St trail
C
50,000
25.
anterbury neighbor park
100,000
Total for FY 2001-02
375,000
FY 2002-03
B
i
2s.
on
ta/Durham neigh trails
26 G
b
125,000
reen
urg neighborhood park
350
000
Total for F22002-03
,
475,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
APPENDIX B
PARKS SYSTEM PROGRAM
OJECTS
METRO
GRNSP
TIGARD
GRNSP
PARK
LEVY
PARK SDC
DONATION
FY 2003-04
27. Fanno Creek Park Improvemts
325,000
28. Tualatin River Ped Bridge
100,000
Total for FY 2003-04
425,000
0
I
I
j 1.1ENGIGUMIP97.98TARKSCIP.DOC
I
? -CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
I APPENDIX B
~l
l
~i
Park CI P Map
APPENDIX B
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PROGRAM
I
UNRESTRICTED
OLD SDC
NEW SDC
FY 1997-98
Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance
40,000
Reserve for capacity upgrades
380,000
Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program
500,000
Totals for FY 1997-98
540,000
52,800
380,000
FY 1998-99
Major maintenance
40,000
Reserve for capacity upgrades
760,000
Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program
400,000
Totals for FY 1998-99
440,000
52,800
760,000
FY 1999-2000
Major maintenance
40,000
Reserve for capacity upgrade
1,140,000
Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program
400,000
Totals for FY 1999-2000
440,000
52,800
1,140,000
FY 2000-01
Major maintenance
40,000
Reserve for capacity upgrades
1,520,000
Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program
300,000
Totals for FY 2000-01
340,000
52,800
1,520.000
FY 2001-02
Major maintenance
40,000
Reserve for capacity upgrades
1,900,000
Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program
200,000
Totals for FY 2001-02
240,000
52.800
1 900,000
FY 2002-03
Major maintenance
40,000
Reserve for capacity upgrades
2,280,000
Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program
200,000
Totals for FY 2002-03
240,000
52,800
2,280 0
00
.
FY 2003-04
Major maintenance
40,000
Reserve for capacity upgrades
2,660,000
Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program
200,000
cua cun7 na s Totals for FY 2003-04
240,000
52,800
2,660,000
. A.sF.wUR110C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
j APPENDIX C
i
4i
I
1
F
,f
1
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PROGRAM
UNRESTRICTED
OLD SDC
NEW SDC
FY 1997-98
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance
40,000
118th CT. Erosion Control
30,000
Park Street Drainage
95,000
Reserve for USA master plan
702,000
Totals for FY 1997-98
165,000
702,000
FY 1998-99
Reserve for USA master plan
809,000
-Storm Drainage Major Maintenance
40,000
Totals for FY 1998-99
40,000
809,000
FY 1999-2000
Reserve for USA master plan
916,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance
40,000
Totals for FY 1999-2000
40,000
916,000
FY 2000-01
Reserve for USA master plan
1,023,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance
40,000
Totals for FY 2000-01
40,000
1,023,000
FY 2001-02
Reserve for USA master plan
1,130,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance
40,000
Totals for FY 2001-02
40,000
1,130,000
FY 2002-03
Reserve for USA master plan
1,237,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance
40,000
Totals forFY2002-113
40,000
1,237,000
FY 2003-04
Reserve for USA master plan
1,344,000
Storm Drainage Major Maintenance
40,000
Totals for FY 2003-04
'97-Qfl1STCFWrIP fl!)f
40,000
1,344,000
® I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
APPENDIX D
WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
WATER FUND
FY 1997-98
• Construction of 3.5 million gallon reservoir at Menlor
3,800,000
site. Reservoir to have an overflow elevation of 410 feet.
Total cost $3,800,000. $2,800,000 to be paid by current
SDC fund, $700,000 from the reservoir reserve fund and
$300,000 from the water fund.
• Install 1,450 feet of 12-inch transmission main on SW
116,000
North Dakota between 115th and 121 st Avenue. This will
complete a 12-inch loop to SW Scholls Ferry Road.
• Install 1,500 feet of 4-inch water main on SW Scoffins
Street. This is to replace an aging 4-inch cast iron water
36,000
main that has had increased maintenance this past year.
• Install 170 feet of 8-inch water main on SW 113th
Avenue, south of SW Durham Road. This is a water main
8,500
replacement due to a road failure.
Total for FY 1997-98
3,960,500
FY 1998-99
• Install 5,600 feet of 24-inch transmission main along SW
672,000
Walnut Street from 121st & Fonner to SW 135th
Avenue.
• Install 1,350 feet of 12-inch distribution main on SW
150th Avenue from Bull Mountain Road to Hawks Ridge,
98,000
phase 1 (Bull Mountain system).
• Construction of Pressure Reducing Station on Bull
Mountain (Bull Mountain system).
20,000
Total for FY 1998-99
790,000
i
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
f APPENDIX E
i
r
WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
WATER FUND
FY 1999-2000
• Install 1,350 feet of 12-inch distribution main on SW
98,000
150th Avenue from Bull Mountain Road to Hawks Ridge,
phase 2 (Bull Mountain system). End of project.
• Install 4,000 feet of 24-inch transmission main on SW
680,000
Greenburg Road, from Hwy 217 to Bradley Corner. This
would include a bore under Hwy 217 ($100,000) and a
PRV station and new meter vault ($100,000).
• Install 4,400 feet of 16-inch transmission main from SW
425,000
135th Avenue and Walnut to Scholls Ferry Road.
• Reserve fund for a reservoir with an overflow elevation of
111,000
550 feet on the northern flank of Bull Mountain (Bull
Mountain system).
Total for FY 1999-2000
1,314,000
FY 2000-01
• Construction of a 1-million gallon reservoir on the
1,300,000
northern flank of Bull Mountain with an overflow
elevation of 550 feet. Also included is a pumping station
($120,000) to transfer water from the 410 zone to the new
reservoir. This is within the Bull Mountain system.
• Install 2,800 feet of 24-inch transmission main on SW
340,000
Beef Bend Road from SW 131st Avenue to SW King
Arthur. This is to be completed during the County project
funded by MSTIP 3. The County pr sect widens Beef
Bend road from two lanes to three, adds retaining walls,
sidewalks, storm drainage improvements and vertical and
horizontal realignment. The County postponed this project
during 1997 due to Measure 47.
Total for FY 2000-01
1,640,000
® CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
APPENDIX E
! ,07) WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM
j
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
WATER FUND
FY 2001-02
• Install 3,200 feet of 16-inch transmission main on SW
315,000
Beef Bend Road from SW 146th Avenue to SW 150th
Avenue north to future reservoir (410 zone).
• Install 3,800 feet of 24-inch transmission main on SW
570,000
Beef Bend Road from SW King Authur to Bull Mountain
Road and 99W. This is the second of a three phase project
to increase water transmission to the south side of Bull
Mountain.
Total for FY 2001-02
885,000
FY 2002-03
• Install 1,900 feet of 24-inch transmission main from SW
300,000
Bull Mountain Road to SW Gaarde Street. This completes
the new 24-inch loop project from SW 131 st Avenue on
Beef Bend Road to SW Gaarde Street.
• Install 3,300 feet of 12-inch water main on SW 121st
248,000
Avenue from SW Walnut Street to SW North Dakota.
This area was identified as needing additional
reinforcement from medium sized transmission facilities.
• Reserve fund for a reservoir with an overflow elevation of
410 or 550 feet, depending upon growth, on the southern
252,000
flank of Bull Mountain.
Total for FY 2002-03
800,000
FY 2003-04
• Install 1,900 feet of 12-inch water main on 99W from SW
270,000
Canterbury Lane to SW Beef Bend Road. This water
main will reinforce transmission facilities to the south end
of our service area. This cost includes a rock allowance.
Page E-3
i WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION WATER FUND
• install 1,620 feet of 12-inch water main on SW Scholls
Ferry Road from SW 135th Avenue to emergency access
to apartment complex on SW Scholls Ferry. This will
complete a circulation loop for this area.
• Reserve fund for a reservoir with an overflow elevation of
410 or 550 feet, depending upon growth, on the southern
flank of Bull Mountain.
Total for FY 2003-04
I:TNGIGUS~ W ASYCIRDOC
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
APPENDIX E
410,000
1997-98 Capital Improvement Program
APPENDIX F
1996-97 Capital Improvement Program
10
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: City Council /1
FROM: Gary Alfson ball ~~J,J
DATE: June 11, 1996
SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program Update
Background
I The six year Capital Improvement Program is up for its annual review. The Capital Improvement
Program includes improvements to the streets, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, water, and parks
systems. The street, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer Capital Improvement Program is managed
by the Engineering Department. The Water Capital Improvement Program is managed by the
j Public Works Department and the Parks Capital Improvement Program is managed jointly by the
1 Planning and Engineering Departments.
Planning Commission approved the proposed Capital Improvement program at their June 3rd
meeting.
i
c Last years prediction for the 96/97 budget was conservative. The tentative list of projects showed
some programs reduced or eliminated and the project list was short. Th e actual budget for 96/97 is
greater than projected in 95/96, therefore maintenance programs need to be restored and additional
1 projects included. Appendix A is the staff recommendation for the updated Capital Improvement
3 Program for 1996/97 through 2001/02. Appendix B is a copy of the last Capital Improvement
Program.
Process
An introduction to the Capital Improvement Program update process was given to a joint Citizen
Involvement Team meeting in March. An overview was discussed and the citizens were requested
to bring their nominations for projects to their next Citizen Involvement Team meeting in April.
Their nominations were added to the previous' projects backlog and to other nominations from
citizens and staff. A great deal of interest was generated this year for speed humps. Last year there
was interest in a pedestrian program. The complete list to date is shown in Appendix C. The
projects have been grouped into categories of the different types of projects to better organize the
list.
I
,
MEMO - City Council - CIP UPDATE
PAGE 1 of 5
The City Council meeting is another opportunity for public input. After public testimony the
Council is requested to adopt the proposed update or to adopt with modifications specified. Staff
will be available at the meeting to provide additional information as necessary.
U12date SUmmarV
Each account shows committed projects at the beginning of 96/97. These are projects previously
approved fo- 95/96 funding but have not been completed as of June 30th, 1996.
It is also important to note that each funding source has restrictions on what type of projects can be
constructed. Projects cannot be moved from one funding source to another. All projects are placed
into funding sources with ample funding if possible.
Recommended Streets Gas Tax Pro'ei cts ' -
The following is a brief description of projects recommended for the 96/97 Capital Improvement
Program.
• Pavement Major Maintenance Program
This is a program of corrective and preventative maintenance
on all the paved streets in Tigard. Typically $300,000 has
been the amount budgeted for the past several years. We
currently have a backlog of $1,500.000 in corrective
overlays, repairs, and slurry seals. We need to maintain as
much of the typical budgeted amount as possible in order to
reduce the backlog. The goal is to become more preventative
and less corrective in our maintenance which will eventually
reduce the budget demand for the future. We are catching up
with the corrective measures but they are a major portion of
the backlog.
• Main Street Reconstruction (Scoffins to 99W)
The center portion of Main Street was reconstructed last year
and this would complete the northeast end of the street. The
pavement condition is poor and reconstruction of the street
and storm drainage system is necessary.
The storm drainage improvements would be funded from the
storm drain new SDC fund. $ 30,000
• Main Street Reconstruction (Fanno Creek to 99M
This would complete the southwest end of Main Street. The
pavement condition is poor and reconstruction of the street
and storm drainage system is necessary.
MEMO - City Council - CIP UPDATE PAGE 2 of 5
The storm drainage improvements would be funded from the
storm drain new SDC fund. $ 40,000
Commercial Street Reconstruction (Main to Hall) $ 200,000
The pavement is in poor condition and the street lacks a
continuous curb and sidewalk. The Downtown Merchants
Association has expressed an interest in improving
Commercial Street, even at the expense of deleting one of the
Main Street projects (Fanno Creek to 99W). Portions of the
pavement have recently been reconstructed and are in good
condition. This project would be similar to the Main Street
project and is proposed to be constructed at the same time.
The storm drainage improvements would be improved with
funds from the storm drainage new SDC fund.$ 30,000
1
• Speed Hump Program $ 45,000
Installation of speed humps on three streets last year have
been effective in reducing speeds and have received a
favorable response from the neighborhoods. There has been
an increased interest in speed humps from the Citizen
Involvement Teams, the Traffic Calming Task Force and
individuals. Last year we budget $30,000. The proposed _
budget is a two part program. The highest ranking projects
are funded 100% with $30,000. Other speed hump projects
' with high neighborhood interest but do not rank as high are
eligible for 50% funding with $15,000. The neighborhood
would be required to fund the remaining 50%. This would
take care of the highest ranking streets in the next 3 to 4
years.
• Alfred Street and 74th Avenue Paving $ 65,000
Currently gravel roads, Alfred Street and 74th Avenue are
proposed for paving to reduce the cost to maintain the gravel
streets. Maintenance Services need to grade the roadway
several times a year to keep the gravel surface smooth. This
- - paving would reduce their annual maintenance costs. - -
Recommended Street TIF Projects
TIF funding is limited to major collector and arterial streets and 50% must be spent on arterial
streets. A portion of these funds are being held in reserve until our transportation planning is
completed. The triangle area has a large potential for improvements to arterial streets. Also, as the
Walnut area is annexed, TIF funding will be necessary to improve 121st Avenue, Gaarde Street,
and Walnut Street.
MEMO - City Council - CIP UPDATE PAGE 3 of 5
• Greenburg Road R/W $ 200,000
The Hall Greenburg Scholls Traffic Study identified the need
to widen Greenburg Road north of Washington Square in the
near future. Additional right of way is needed for this
widening which is adjacent to the Cemetery.
• Greenburg/Mapleleaf Intersection $ 50,000
The improvements to this intersection are necessary for
additional capacity and safety. This project was also
identified in the Hall Greenburg Scholls traffic study. The
project is being combined with an ODOT project to improve
the Greenburg/217 overpass and offramp and has received
Federal funding. The City's share of the project cost is
10.275%.
Attached is the initial draft for a plan for the parks component of the city's five-year CIP, which
begins 7/96. The plan is an update of the seven-year CIP put together in 1995. The new plan
reflects major revisions to revenue estimates and changes in project priorities. The revenue
revisions include increased park SDC funding generated by a new fee structure adopted in February
1996 and a City entitlement of $758,000 in Metro Greenspaces bond measure funds. A list of
Greenspaces-funded projects was adopted by Council in April 1996. Among other things, the parks
CIP keynotes how Greenspaces links up with the other components of the parks CIP.
To highlight the proposed changes in project priorities, a copy of the seven-year parks CIP adopted
in 1995 is attached. Among the projects authorized for funding in 1995-96, two were completed
(the Terrace Trail pathway and the Summerlake Park fencing projects), two were placed on hold
(The N. Dakota-Tigard and the Englewood-Fanno Creek trail connections) and are included as
committed projects in the 1996-97 list, and one was abandoned. The abandoned project was the
74th Avenue natural area park, which was dropped at Council's direction because the purchase
price was not within the established budget for the project.
As for future years, the "new community park" project identified in last year's parks CIP for
funding over multiple years has been deleted. -this is because the proposed acquisition of a 12-acre
parcel on Bull Mountain as part of the Greenspaces program appears to fulfill the need this project
was intended to meet. Another change is that the project previously identified as the Woodard-
Main park connection has been redefined to include funding solely for land acquisition for this trail
segment and for a trail segment along Fanno Creek from Hall Boulevard to Durham Road. This
was done to leverage Metro Regional Greenspace funding potentially available for land acquisition
within these areas.
New projects in the proposed plan include the five natural area and [railway land acquisitions
funded by Metro Greenspaces pass through funds, the proposed expansion of Cook Park, and new
MEMO - City Council - CIP UPDATE PAGE 4 of 5
1
1
neighborhood parks in the Greenberg and Canterberry areas. As indicated, the Greenspaces
projects were approved by Council in April 1996. The Greenberg and Canterberry neighborhood
parks were added to provide park services in areas identified as park deficient in the Tigard Park
Plan. The Canterberry Park is proposed to be developed on the five-acre water district property.
Land acquisition would be needed to accommodate a park serving the Greenburg area.
A major unknown in putting together the parks CIP is the extent, timing, and cost of the Cook Park
Expansion. A master plan with cost estimates is scheduled to be completed later this year. For
present purposes, estimated amounts have been included in the parks CIP to reserve funds for this
project.
The park system funding is proceeding through a separate process to determine projects for the next
several years. This is due to the Metro funding and the new Parks SDC funds.
j
Sanitary Sewed
I
The sanitary sewer funding has three funding sources with the least amount of flexibility. The
f
j
funding is reserved for maintenance repairs on currently unknown projects, capacity upgrades as
recommended from the USA report and for the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program. No
projects have been proposed at this time for the sanitary sewer fluids.
Storm Drainage Funding
The storm drainage funding has the same mix of sources as the sanitary sewer fund.. The funding
I ` -
~
is generally reserved for currently unknown small projects that come up during the year. Funding
f
h
SDC'
aJ
rom t
e new
s must be used on projects designated on the USA Master Plan which has yet to
be completed.
• 111 th Place Storm Drain
This is a project carried over from last year.
• I I8th/Terrace Trails Drainageway
The heavy rains and development upstream of the creek
located northwest of 118th Avenue and Gaarde Street has _
caused substantial erosion of the creek bed. The erosion is
causing the embankment adjacent to the homes on 118th
Avenue to slough off. This project will stabilize the erosion
by slowing the flow of the creek.
Water Svctem Fundin2
i
The water system funding is determined by the Maintenance Services Department with the
approval of the Intergovernmental Water Board.
CQJC,oar rXCrP-PC-%I Dpi
U
MEMO - City Council - CIP UPDATE PAGE 5 of 5
j
R STREET,PR0I~ECTS e.I.P
PROJECT
TIF
GAS TAX
OTHER FUNDING
Committed Projects
Transportation Study
23,000
99W Study
(16,000)
TIF transit reserve
349,000
109th Avenue South of Naeve
110,000
79th/Durham traffic signal
43,289
School Dist.
79th Ave. preliminary design
10,000
130th Avenue Scholls to Hawks
300,000
Beard
30th/Winterlake bridge.
575,000
ajor Maintenance
-t ~23,000
Bull Mountain Road
S,1f00
Bonita Road
25,000
\Burnham Street
10,000
TOTAL Committed Projects
1,379,000
96,239
FY 1996-97
Committed Projects
1,379,000
96-)89
TIF Transit reserve
89,000
fajor maintenance
223,711
Alfred St .paving
30,000
74th Ave. paving (Bonita to
35,000
Durham)
Main St. pavement reconstruction
260,000
Storm Drain 70,000
Commercial Street reconstruction
200,000
Storm Drain 30,000
(Scoff-ms to 99W and Fanno Creek
to 99W)
79th Ave @ Durham Traffic Signal
39 98A
6,000
Speed H'u lp Program
45,000
Walnut/riedeman riw
75.000
Greenburg Road rhv
200,000
Greenbur&N- lapleleaf intersection
50,000
TIF reserve
457,000
Totals for FY 1996-97
2,300,000
396,000
CAPITAL. INIPROVEN[ENT PROGRAM
APPF.NtDTX A
i
j.
i
i
t
I ,
a
i I
1
F
f
....<STREET `Y.E2f}JEG'
~'.I.F.
i
i
i
i
r
1 k~
1
PROJECT
TIF
GAS TAX
OTHER FUNDING
FY 1997-98
TIF transit reserve
70,000
Major maintenance
300,000
79th Avenue
107,000
LID
Ped. improvements - Park/Watkins
160,000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
Traffic Study
30,000
North Dakota Bridge
158,000
Bonita Road RR to Bridge
400,000
TIF reserve
341,933
TOTALS FOR FY 1997-98
811,933
300,000
FY 1998-99
TIF transit reserve
54,000
Major Maintenance
300,000
Pedestrian improvements
50,000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
Burnham/Main Signal
40,000
80,000
North Dakota bridge replacement
1.18,084
(design & rhv)
TIF reserve
533.675
Totals for FY 1993-99
632,675
578,084
FY 1999-3000
TIF transit reserve
45,000
Major maintenance
300.000
Pedestrian improvements
50.000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
North Dakota bridge replacement
239,135
TIF reserve
432.509
Totals for FY 1999-00 I
527,509
589,135
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
l
STREET PRaJEC I S C Y.P I
PROJECT
TIF
GAS TAX
OTHER FUNDING
00-01
F transit reserve
35,000
Major maintenance
300,000
Pedestrian improvements
50,000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
North Dakota bridge replacement
200,000
HalUHunziker/Scoffms (design)
50,023
TIF reserve
373,135
Totals for FY 2000-01
408,135
600,023
FY 2001-02
TIF transit reserve
40,000
TIF reserve
373,541
Major maintenance
300,000
Pedestrian improvements
50,000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
HalVHunziker/Scolfins
260,714
Totals for F Y 2001-02
413,541
610,714
j CAPITAL IMPROVEbIENT PROGRA vi
i
APPENDIX A
IiI . .
I
-
r
r
PARKS C I P
1
i
i
I
a
1
1
I
l
PROJECTS
GREENSPACES
PARK LEVY
SDC
FY 1996-97
N. Dakotarrigard trail connection
17,000
33,000
Englewood-Fanno Creek park connection
100,000
Cook Park expansion
390,000
Fem St., Greenspace
125,000
Cook Park Greenspace
46,000
Bond St. Greenspace
118,000
Bull Nit Rd Greenspace
293,000
Fanno Ck trail (land acquisition)
176.000
200,000
Total for FY 1996-97
758,000
17,000
723,000
FY 1997-98
Cook Park expansion
250,000
Fanno Creek trail (land acquisition)
200,000
Ash Ave - Fanno Creek path connection
30,000
Total for FY 1997-98
480,000
FY 1998-99
Englewood Park basketball court
15,000
Fanno Creek park trail lighting
40,000
Cook Park expansion
250,000
Fanno Creek path construction
100,000
Total for FY 1998-99
405,000
FY 1999-2000
Cook Park expansion
150,000
Fanno Creek path construction
100,000
Total for 1999-2000
_
250,000
FY 2000-01
Fanno Creek trail construction
120,000
Canterberrv neighbor park (imp&fac)
100,000
Total for 2000-01 I
220,000
FY 2001-02
Fanno Creek trail construction
100,000
Greenberg neighbor park (land acq)
120.000
Total for 2001-02
220,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEbIENT PROGRAM
r
SAM.'ARY SEWER C1 P
r
I
i
j
J
~
i
i
i
i
I
I
I
UNRESTRICTED
OLD SDC
NEW SDC
FY 1996-97
Neighborhood sewer en program
514,609
Major maintenance
30,000
Reserve for capacity upgrades
349,000
544,609
118,734
349,000
FY 1997-98
Major maintenance
30,000
Reserve for capacity upgrades
278,000
Neighborhood sewer ext. prog.
94,216
124216
278,000
FY 1998-99
Major maintenance
30,000
Reserve for capacity upgrades
225,000
Neighborhood sewer ext. prog.
99,269
129,269
225,000
FY 1999-2000
Major maintenance
30,000
Reserve for capacity upgrade
187,000
Neighborhood sewer ext. prog.
103,920
133,920
187,000
FY 2000-01
Major maintenance
30.000
Reserve capacity upgrades
142,000
Neighborhood sewer ext. prog.
109.775
13",'76
1" nnn
FY x001-02
Major maintenance
30,000
Reserve capacity upgrades
100,000
Neighborhood sewer ext. prog.
160.197
190,197
100,000
Page 5
:r
j STORM DRAINAGE C Z.Y
UNRESTRICTED
OLD SDC
NEW SDC
FY 1996-97
I 1 Ith Place storm drain
2,000
118dv7errace Trails Drainageway
9,000
plain and Commercial Streets
100,000
Reserve for USA master plan
37,997
146,997
FY 1997-98
Reserve for USA master plan
108,155
108,155
FY 1998-99
Reserve for USA master plan
78 534
78.534
FY 1999-2000
Reserve for USA master plan
61,493
61,493
FY 2000-01
Reserve for USA master plan
43,311
43,311
FY 2000-01
Reserve for USA master plan
43,895
43,895
Page 6
APPENDIX A
:..WATER SYSTEM C.I.P
PROJECTS
WATER FUND
FY 1996-97
Land and Improvements to begin construction of 3.5 million gallon
300,000
reservoir at the Menlor site. Reservoir to have an overflow elevation of
410 feet (410 zone). 50% existing 50% future.
Land and Improvements to begin construction of 3.5 million gallon
90,000
reservoir at the Menlor site. Reservoir to have an overflow elevation of
410 feet (410 zone). 50% existing 50% future.
Install 1,450 feet of 12-inch distribution main on SW 130th Avenue
14,400
between Winterlake and Hawks Beard (410 zone). 80% existing 20%
future.
Install 900 feet of 8-inch distribution main on SW 130th Avenue north
36,000
of Hawks Beard to Scholls Ferry Road (410 zone). 100% future.
Construction of Pressure Relief Valve station in Bull Mountain
20,000
Meadows subdivision (Bull Mountain System). 30% existing 20%
future.
Construction of Pressure Reducing Station on Bull Mountain (Bull
20,000
Mountain system). 100% future.
Upgrade pumps at High Tor il I to provide additional capacity (Bull
13,000
Mountain system) 10% existine 90% future.
TOTAL FOR FY 1996-97
585,400
FY 1997-98
Construction of 3.5 million gallon reservoir at ivlenlor site. Reservoir to
260,000
have an overflow elevation of 410 feet. Total cost 52,960,000.
52.000,000 to be paid by current SDC fund and 5700,000 from the
reservoir reserve fund. 50116 existing 50% future.
Install 5,600 feet of 24-inch transmission main along SW Walnut Street
672,000
from 121st & Former to SW 135th Avenue (410 zone). 20% existing
30% future.
Total for FY 1997-98 I
932.000
FY 1998-99
Install 4.000 feet of 24-inch transmission main on SW Greenbw
Road
v3l
000
g
,
from Hwy 217 to Bradlev Corner. This would include a bore under
,
H,-vv 317 ($100,000) and a PRV station and new meter vault
(5100,000). This is within the 410 zone. '_0%existine 30% future.
Install 1.350 feet of 12-inch distribution main on SW 150th Avenue
81.000
from Bull Mountain Road to Hawks Ridge, phase I (Bull Mountain
system). 40% existing 60% future.
Construction of Pressure Reducing Station on Bull Mountain (Bull
20,000
Mountain system). 100°./o future.
Total for FY 1998-99 I
731,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAhI
APPENDIX A
i
i ,
i'
i
l
9 PROJECTS
WATER FUND
FY 1999-2000
Install 1,350 feet of 12-inch distribution main on SW 150th Avenue
fivnt Bull Mountain Road to Hawks Ridge, phase 2 (Bull Mountain
system). End of project. 40% existing 60% future.
Install 4,400 feet of 16-inch transmission main from SW 135th Avenue
and Walnut to Scholls Ferry Road (410 zone). 100% future.
Install 3,200 feet of 16-inch transmission main on SW Beef Bend road
from SW 146th Avenue to SW 150th Avenue north to future reservoir
(410 zone). 100% future.
Reserve fund for a reservoir with either an overflow elevation of 550
feet or 470 feet on the northern flank of Bull Mountain (Bull Mountain
system). 80% existing 20% future.
Total for FY 1999-00
FY 2000-2001
Construction of 1 million gallon reservoir on the northern flank of Bull
Mountain with an overflow elevation of 470 or 550 feet. Also included is a
pumping station ($120.000) to transfer water from the 410 zone to the new
reservoir. This is within the Bull Mountain system. 30% existing 20%
future.
Total for-2000-01
u
CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
APPENDLY A
CITY OFTIGARD
PAVEMENTOVERLAY BACKLOG
STRf:LE
1
LIMITS
-
AREA
ISII
ON'ERl_t I'
ITONS)
DEPTH
ONCTO.S)
EAB.
DIGOLrIS
isv)
STNIPE
ILF)
TOTAL
COST
11uniliatil
Hall to Main
7,000
1,181
3
0
15
0
2,000
$45.500
Gaardc'
I10thto 121st
9.400
1.586
3
.
3,000
S87A50
Walnut'
199W toTiedcman
7,600
1.283
3
_ 25
_ 2,500
_
572,550
121st'
Walnut to North Dakota
10.000
1.688
3
3,000
591,500
68th Avenue
S/O Hampton to 65th
4.000
563
2.5
100
S18,700
Tigard Street
Ticdeman to Main
12.770
2.155
3
25%
_
3,400
-
$82,127
109th Ave
At Murdock Intersection
2,700
456
3
100%
500
0
$31,558
McKenzie PI
99W north 0.05
1.056
178
3
_ 0
_ 0
0
S4,990
School Street
99W to Grant
616
104
3
0
0
0
52,911
Saltier'
_
100th to Hall
12,133
2,047
- 3
- 20
- -
582,898
North Dakota
Ticdeman to 12 l st
13,900
2.346
3
$65,678
Nimbus
Scholls to 1/2 Length
2,874
485
_ 3
50°/
500
$23,555
113th
Durham to C.L.
2.000
338
_
3
_
0
0
0
$13.500
70th Avcnuc
Alfred North
1,000
169
3
_
56,750
Grant
Park to School
2,610
440
3
1000%
50
0
524,033
Serena Street
Durham to Serena
600
101
3
S42,813
Ross Street
Hall to
8 Ist
2.100
354
3
S 14,175
70th Avenue
-
Oak to End _
792
134
_ 3
55,346
Hampton
68th to 66th
5,420
915
3
0
20
0
0
546,585
66th Ave
I lampton to Cds
7,321
1.235
3
100°/
.
560,398
66th Ave
68th to Hampton
4,150
700
_ 3
3.700
542,813
110th Avc
Fairhaven to Garden Park
2,960
500
3
100%
5.0
526,920
Shady
Greenburg to 95th
4,460
753
3
50%
-
533,450
Oak Street
Grcen
burg to 95th
2.580
Crack Seal 5
2,000
52,000
Bonita
_
72nd to Sequoia
2,581
Crack Seal 5
2,000
100
0
56.000
Center
95th to End
587
99
3
_
53.962
82nd
Pfaflcto End
_
1,079
182
3
_
57.283
Ticdeman
Walnut to Curve
5.170
872
3
25°6
536,836
Ticdeman
Tigard to Meadow
2,850
481
3
519,23$
Grant
Johnson to Tigard
3,700
624
3
1,100
_
529,375
Scof'iins
Main to Ilaa
5,400
911
_ 3
25°0
50
_
1,500
546,975
74th
Spruce to End
1.267
214
3
_
58,552
Ventura Ct.
Ventura Dr to Barbara
3,000
0
0
-
100
S51000
Pine,
69th to End
470
79
3
$3,173
66th
Taylors rcrry to End
1,400
236
3
-
59,450
67th Avenue
Oak to End
586
132
4
Gravel
- 55,274
69th Avenue
Oak to End _
1.030
232
4
Gravcl
59.270
Alfred Street
Ventura to 70th
2.350
529
4
Gravel
521,150
Maplelcaf
72nd to 7lst _
850
191
4
Gravel
- -
- 57,650
66th Avenue
Oak to End
470
106
4
Gravel
S4,230
69th Avenue
Dartmouth to Clinton
1.056
238
4
Gravel
59.504
69th Avenue
Dartmouth to Hampton
4,224
950
Clinton
69th to 70th
528
119
4
Gravcl
54,752
Walnut Terrace
69th to End
1,994
449
4
Gravel
517,946
76th
Durham to Bond
1.620
365
4
Gravel
$14,580
107th
Park to Cook
698
157
4
Gravel
_
-
- $6,282
Jefferson
Locust to End
375
63
3
Gravel
S2.531
89th
Spruce to End
1,450
245
3
Gravel
_
S9,788
Thom
89th to End
610
110
3
Gravcl
_
_
$4,388
Landau
77th to 75th
,
LO50
177
3
Gravel
57.088
TOTALS
S I,266.488
with widening to ultimate
0 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPENDIX G
I
t
f
I
i
I
Capital Improvement Program
Update
May 1, 1997
At the Joint CIT meeting on April 1 at Mary Woodward Elementary School, several projects were
introduced for consideration in the CIP formulation process. The following are the projects and the
results of our evaluation of the feasibility for inclusion in the 1997-98 CIP Budget:
Streets
• 107th Street from Park Street to Cook Lane - Research indicates that there is a 20-foot wide
sewer easement where the existing road currently lies. There is another 20-foot driveway
easement adjacent to the sewer easement. There is no public rights-of-way between the two
streets along 107th Avenue. Placing an adequate road along 107th would require dedication of at
least a 40-foot wide rights-of-way and reconstruction of the roadway to center it within that
rights-of-way. It is beyond the scope of what is normally included in the Pavement Major
Maintenance Program and hence will not be included in next year's CIP Budget. f
• 114th Avenue from Gacu•de Street to 13u11 d9ourntainn Road -This street is a local street and is
currently not in the Comprehensive Transportation Plan for upgrade to collector status. Widening 1
with full improvements and connection to Bull Mountain Road will in effect upgrade it to
collector status. The Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study did not identify this street as
one of the connector streets. It is much too close to 99W. Connection between Gaarde and Bull
Mountain Road should probably be further west. Additional studies, as recommended by the
Planning staff, will be required as to the proper disposition of this street. Nevertheless, this
project would require reconstruction and widening of the street, which is beyond the scope of the
Pavement Major Maintenance Program. It, therefore, will not be included in next year's CIP
budget.
• Pedestrian Perth along Park Street -This project will be eliminated, but the drainage project will j
be retained. The residents are not interested in widening of the street, but are most concerned
about the drainage problem along that street.
• Pedestrian Path along II'crtkinns .Street from Park Street to Walnut Street - This segment of road
is currently drained through a system of ditches adjacent to the paved street surface. This
segment of road is lengthy and would require installation of an underground drainage system to
allow widening of the road sufficient to place a pedestrian path throughout the entire length. The
cost would be extremely high for both projects and cannot be included in next year's budget.
,_,J Capital Improvement Program Update
APPENDIX H
• Speed !lumps along Park Street - There is it list of established criteria for a street to be eligible
for speed humps. Park Street does not meet the criteria for traffic volume and is therefore not
eligible for placement of speed humps.
• Bonita Road from the Railroad Tracks to the Bridge - This project is included for construction
in next year's CIP Budget. It will widen and reconstruct Bonita Road in the segment that has not
yet been constructed. The project will provide sidewalks on both sides, underground drainage,
and place the power system underground to match the rest of Bonita Road.
• Sidewalks on Scoffrns Street from Hall Boulevard to the existing walktivays - Scoffins Street
requires realignment to connect to Hall Boulevard across from Hunziker Street. Sidewalks placed
now will be removed when this realignment occurs. The realignment is included in the long-
term Capital Improvement Program and will be scheduled when sufficient funding has been
accumulated to allow the project to proceed. The sidewalks will therefore not be included in next
year's CIP Budget, but will be constructed with the realignment of Scoffins Street.
• Fluorescent Diamonds on Speed Limit Signs - The ones we are aware of are relatively large and
are used on freeway speed limit signs. Residential areas are already understood to be 25 mph
zones. These diamonds would not be appropriate for residential areas. They may be appropriate
for streets such as Walnut Street and Bull Mountain Road where the speed limits are not
immediately obvious. We will look into the feasibility of using these fluorescent diamonds on
major collectors and arterials during the next fiscal year.
1 Storm Drainage
1 Park Street Storm Drainage -This project will be included in next year's budget.
i
Streetlights
• There is an amount of $20,000 included in the Street Lights and Signals Budget for installation
of additional streetlights throughout the City. The Engineering Department is in the process of
developing criteria for selection of locations to receive additional lighting and will present the
criteria and priority listings to the CIT's after the development and evaluation are completed.
I \ENG~GUSVP97-981CIPUPDAT DOC
I Capital Improvement Program Update
Parks
• The only Parks related item was the request that the play structure in Woodard Park be replaced.
There was also a concern that the existing structures may be unsafe. The Parks personnel have
inspected the play structures and have verified that they are still perfectly safe for use. They are
currently evaluating the feasibility of replacing the play structures and will make a report on their
evaluation during the June CIT meetings.
Page 1-1-2
APPENDIX H
~..i
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Gus Duenas, Engineer
FROM: Wayne Lowry, Director of Finance
DATE: June 4, 1997
i
i SUBJECT: Approved budget numbers for 1997/98 CIP
L
We have updated the capital project appropriations included in the approved budget to include th
changes made by the budget committee. Please make sure that the numbers for 1997/98 in th
capital improvement plan that you present to the City Council on June 24, 1997 do not exceed thes
numbers. At this time, these numbers represent the appropriations that will be adopted by th
Council in the 1997/98 budget.
"I Sanitary Sewer
--1 Storm Sewer - User fees
Water Quality/Quantity
State Gas Tax
Traffic Impact Fee
Parks SDC
Park Levy Improvement
Tree Replacement
Underground Utility
Water Fund
j Water CIP Reserve
Water SDC
Traffic Impact Fee Urban Services
Metro Greenspaces
$ 2,000,000
700,000
702,980
807,991
3,500,000
1,430,000
191,137
246,200
130,000
1,602,096
778,604
3,000,000
444,453
631,224
If you have any questions on this information, please let me know.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Page I-I
r
f
I
e
e
e
e
j AGENDA ITEM # 1 {
FOR AGENDA OF CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE _Request Land Use Application Fee Waiver
+ PREPARED BY: Dick DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK
! I
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
~ F
Should the City Council grant a waiver of land use application fees to the Tualatin Valley Housing Partners, Inc. E
and the Arcand Company.
a
None
INFORMATION SUMMARY
,,The attached letter from Topaz Faulkner of the Tualatin Valley Housing Partners, Inc. requests a waiver of fees G ,
pursue a comprehensive plan and zoning change for the Hawthorne Villa Apartments at 7709 SW Pfaffle.
r The Council and staff have been supportive of providing affordable housing in Tigard. The development code
specifically authorizes fee waivers only for appeals. The fees for a comprehensive plan amendment, zone
1 change and pre-application conference would be $4556.
Development application fees in the City of Tigard cover only the cost of time for processing an application not
! overhead costs like Washington County fees. The fees help defray the cost of local governement to the local
j taxpayer by placing them on the user. The user in the above case includes the Arcand Company which is a
j private corporation as co-owner of the apartments in question.
i
There is concern about the need to provide revenue to pay for the plan review activities. There is also concern
about how many times similar requests to waive fees would come up and the revenue impact.
Should the Council wish to waive the fees, a motion to direct the Community Development Director to accept
the applications without fees would be appropriate.
RECD MAY 12 1997
i*ualatin Valley
April 30, 1997
HOUSING
PARTNERS
❑.•numumilyderch'i nurnl
mpwmuon
Jim Nicoli, Mayor
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Anna Geller
......rot
Dear Mayor Nicoli:
Grey, Lu tte
v;,,.
I am writing on behalf of Tualatin Valley Housing Partners, Inc.
(TVHP) to request a waiver of the fees associated with an
Dan rrLe` rv
application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone
&
x n•larv/Tn•an.rrr
Change.
We are a non profit, community development corporation
Senatorjeannette Hamhv
dedicated to the provision of affordable housing in Washington
Councilman Wes Yuen
County. TVHP is a co-owner with The Arcand Company of the
Hawthorne Villa Apartments at 7709 SW Pfaffle. The complex
Barbara Smith
consists of 119 units and was built in 1970 at a density of
Mike Schmidt
approximately 25 units per acre. However, the property is
Marv Tobias
planned and zoned at 12 units per acre.
Peter Herman
The Arcand Company and TVHP are interested in requesting a
Leon Laptook
change in the plan and zone designation to bring them into
• Judy Bauman
conformance with the actual density. We are asking the City
Karl Mawson
Council for a waiver of the application fees to allow us to pursue
this course.
Sharon Geraci
Larry sensnn
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Cordially. A
Fopaz Faulkner
Err•. W'- D"', ior
gy„y
'
j
Topaz Faulk r, AICP
Izssosw
InirdStreet
Beaverton, OR 97005
Executiv Dir ctor
(503) 231-2987
✓c: James Hendryx, Community Development Director
Fax 239-57,90