Loading...
City Council Packet - 08/13/1996 ~ a 4 J % CITY OF TIG D OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING ~f 7 r AUGUST 13,1 996 H . t r.c ' J 5 4 ry'Y d 7 S M1 F _ a p. COUNCIL MEETING ILL BE TELEVISED i i 13125 SW Hail Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 t f .f t; ~.l --t - ~ _..~ame._.~_.~,,.~....~~...........n~-.sCS<~...+..... ,..A_L .e_.a`~...e.~.......~.~__.d_.. _ _..._,~,~..~._.....~_n...._ } i ~ & fp i ; rye k 1 ' i CITY OF TIGARD 011 OCR G: PUBLIC NOTICE: a , Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda G r r item should sign on the appropriate sign- 4 up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask ` r ~'ICtGAtk? bttECE 9721«- to be recognized by the Mayor at the agenda ite-M Vieiter'e t r :ass = - - of that beginning a~e Agendaitems are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting{ either the Mayor or the City Administrator. kz i. 3 e td- at'~F~. .-.v Times noted are estimated: it is recommended that persons interested in testifying ` be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business 1ti agenda items can be heard in any order after 7.30 pm "r ° Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and x ; should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the a s s r Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). v~ F tom- - - z k.~ Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: e~ • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing. ; impairments; and r k • Qualified bilingual interpreters. , Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it isx important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your n! ' need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above: 639-4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD p - ' - 43 3 LY Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). = 1 = SEE ATTACHED AGENDA a~ _Z F 3 3 ~ 1 TWIN, ~ F COUNCIL AGENDA -AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 1 i nn _ tP~ 1 r ' 1 3 ~ J k' - - - A - - + - ~k-- 4 - f4t i , ' t - p. y F Y_ _ _ _ P 'C^ -L" { " 3 - i. dfi - _ X- - - Wyk s A' • 'E't - i 'Ca 'Z' La 3 4 - - F rte' n,- x' ~ k - t ak Y-.- {y.'ji _ Y `s~IT" i3 stj, - r _ - - • '4r3.-y _t _ __.._a .._....-..w,.~...; o cr„ar - I- - - < T.~ e - Q - ,h .4 F 9 fi , jpr-, f- k AGENDA k ' 7 k~ f 0 Tigard City Council Meeting -August 13, 1996 ,t ~ ' " 6:30 p.m. 1 y STUDY MEETING > Update: Council Computers - ? > Review: Proposed Changes to City Charter ' r ~ 4 , > Update: Ballot Measure 47, "Cut and Cap" t t ~ ti ` ~ W t r rv 7:30 p.m. € - , i r ' ~ ~ ' -3 1. BUSINESS MEETING - ; ~ i~f { 1.1 Call to Order -City Council a Local Contract Review Board t:z r t$ ' 1.2 ROII Call R,' Y s } Ar : z 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance . .4 C~ n.n %.v~nmunicationslLiaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items ' .1` a -i sx s 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) r" ~ 1 , t Ig,aL k`4 7:45 p.m. Wit` r r v 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be ; ' enacted In one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request t ' a ~ - , that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.E`` , Motion to: r k tdgi~i M 3.1 Approve City Council Minutes - July 9 and 16, 1996 _ ~ - 3.2 Receive File: I 'm a. Council Calendar ' ' ' ' b. Tentative Agenda ~4$s~ M 1-4- y " - i M1 v- F ~ f - 3.3 Lows Contract Review Board: li-. a. Award Contract for Construction of the Main ~ _ , I Street/Commercial Street Reconstruction Project R' ~ 'r~~ b. Award Contract for Construction of the 1996 Major ! w l ~ ` k i E % Maintenance Program fi 3.4 Approve Historic Application Fee Waiver Request from the Tigard - < a Chamber of Commerce? ; 3.5 Accept Transfer of jurisdiction of a portion of Durham Road from the Oregon Department of Transportation ~ F _ • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items f r ~ ~r ,r s f k i requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate I. T , x i i discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted , , , on those items which do not need discussion. ' z , f j rdn - „ 'Sit-r - ° ' F ` t COUNCIL AGENDA -AUGUST 13, 1996 -PAGE 2 ` w r' A~' x ' i} ~ -t ~ k~.' r F 4 # d S k kv.- :rnw4e+m t_rac :•x - _ _ _ u.*Y M.;4'~.v_ cur""., 1 J' %M d E^'°`tF e-' c 'I r _ - - 'n ? ~ ~ a 4 Y. fi : r y J 'll i _ _ rY _ _ ,.1 - r" t - - i A, .C ~ f~ ti .:j ~ ~ [a " , ~ ~ i -1 ' ~ .-L : ~ ~ , I , r r, ~ " r' - - , _ _ f ~5 f + f~} 5 rte, t k9 - - i I 1. , L , I 1]', ~ ; ~ 1, L - - ZJr I I s m Ef- r x -,43 - t ? i t~I 2 .-n; ' - . 4._~ ..t ._~.i_ " r , i> - t_.. . 4. _ - . _ _ . F.L - - .•-r c x q t bT3 ~ _ - _ - 4 _ Y 2 - R i a t - ~ i 1~1 , M,.--`1,11'111~il'~1-11 ~ L ;i " -z' ,:`::-F-,---'-,--.A-, ~ " -"~-~i a ',yz,7 riz •r _ , i t - f- J tih.:-~ ¢.3 4 3'£; - ti a : ~r s - r h Fk S s W, f 53 ti_ s 3-- ley - ~u ~5..'` a d. 1 r si s a-11 a 1 4 7:50 p.m. - 4 x x~ f k 4. CONSIDER ORDINANCE - AMENDING CHAPTER 7.32 - OFFENSES ; ~ " w i AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER ~f.~, ~ J~ ` Staff Report: Chief of Police • Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 96•_ ,ti - - -i 8:00 P.M. ~ , z k fr 11 , S. CONSIDER ORDINANCE - AMENDING CHAPTER 5.10 - DETECTIVES ~ . p.~ M { ' - r z s AND MERCHANT POLICE + 4 i Staff Report: Chief of Police g ~ gg • Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 96- - s~ lt~ = . ' - - 1-5 F 8:10 P.M. rskr 6. CONSIDER ORDINANCE - ADOPTING ANNEXED PROPERTY ~ 3~ I'll - _ "t DESIGNATIONS ! 4 ~ L v., } , } • Staff Report: Community Development Director e 0 i t Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 96- at Ordinance No. - ! ' ~ ~ ~ 96- ; - "a k'ef'd` '3• IN y Y 8:20 p.m. -1 r x a 7. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - VACATION OF I ~ , . 1 I APPROXIMATELY 6,445 SQUARE FEET OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY - r ' s LOCATED ON SW 135TH AVENUE ~ n Kt The request was initiated by the City Council on June 11, 1996. Any" - interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed Z,vacation of said public right of way. Any written objections or remonstrances shall be filed with the City Recorder by August 13,1996, - , ~W a. by 7:30 Op.m. ' L k = z~ Open Public Hearing ` e ? r b. Declarations or Challenges r rr a c. Staff Re ort: Commu ' € p mty Development Department ns i a d. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents, Rebuttal) , _ q' } e. Staff Recommendation ~ -4 W i f. Council Questions ` a - ~ s P 11 d v g• Close Public Hearing w¢# - _ & "fir it a ' } h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 96-_s s a R' n e, t t-, r Xz i a - k 1 ry # f s , "x& e a ' ` ar n~ ~a COUNCIL AGENDA -AUGUST 13, 1996 -PAGE 3 , _ , r , t , s p f- F k.ca y t t ``2- - - M- rfi rr "'"-'t'm ra~R' 5 " 'J zt --sY# 1 F3~ -d"v~ e.- ✓ I - 3 _ - 3 x s r # r s r- s x- Ic t i } i p ri s t t - a - - s - T - i,£ .Tk r"r fi M k - - 5 - ` - { - r-"` rn FI z c- F i g,° ^r - d 3 3 v A x sa _ f_ - - m obi l f - l ' - J A Y Y V~ S-,f F { - - ~ - - u M1 4 , :l , .,I LL.- z $ 1sa8 Y , i Fk f- _ r 5 t ~ V1, r p"4, 4~.hh'x x F ~.',a•~`N'•. °°"-*aW= ....u.:ed:ssS-," ;.s r' `"tom-,', r x i x s ,s yµ f 'aa'bj i Y ; Y I j. r ; 8:30 p.m. a~ 8. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,Y 5 4 s, AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-0002 AKA BUSINESS SERVICES (Set over ` ~ , - t from the July 9, 1996 Council meeting.) _ - f s 7 = tW s REQUEST: Amend the text of policy 12.2.1(2)(1a) of the v ® ~r = - Comprehensive Plan to modify the spacing and locational criteria for _ ` General Commercial land uses. LOCATION: City Wide. ZONE: N/A ry ` r APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, P.;;L 1 s -4 ` , f ti 10, 11 and 12; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.1(a), 1.1. I (c), € , ~ i . , 2.1.1, 5.4, 6.1.1, 8.1.1 and 12.2.2; Tigard Community Development " a ? Code chapter 18.30; and Oregon Administrative Rule Chapter 660, j s- D vislon 12. ai; z- s v t Eyr i~~# t~~ctt c a. Public Hearing Opened s> i + b. Declarations or Challenges _ r € 4 T _ C. Staff Report (Community Development Department) ° c52:;..v.ry ~rruponen[s, opponents) r~ ~a _ e. Staff Recommendation r ~k "d ' f. Council Questions or Comments r + , £ ,r ' g. Public Hearing Closed 4 - , ' F c s,r - h. Council Consideration: Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare Final Order 9:30 p.m. 11- x,, ~ `r r 9. CONSIDER FINAL ORDER - (QUASI-JUDICIAL) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN r=x s x I S ` 1 _6 11 11 - AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-0004/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 96- ? ~ s 0003/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) 96-0002 - SATTLER SITE_ - r , ^y • Staff Report: Community Development Director = E z .s k ~ • Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 96-_~~ 9:40 p.m. 4.1 - I = z;.'° 10. CONSIDER FINAL ORDER - (LEGISLATIVE) - COMPREHENSIVE ';~T W N , PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-0001 BLEDSOE ~ € Staff Report: Community Development Director _ 4 1 Council Consideration: Resolution No. 96-_ ~ w N T 4 }F s ;t - E ~ r I S :.i I3 9:50 P.M. ,41 R'' n 11. CONSIDER RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FUTURE EXPENDITURE t ' t~`£ tfr3?' r 1 OF THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY AT 12420 SW c ; t " ~ ' ~6 € MAIN STREET, TIGARD, OREGON L t- t, • Staff Report: Finance Director 4~, k ' Council Consideration: Resolution No. 96-_ [ d Yi t i t - ~ .-1 t i ; 'i€-- E L_ - r COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 4 # ~k F A 4 1_~~,X~,~,,', ~i~_. ; ~ 7~,,, r ,,~,;t_- - { 3 8'f F F T T - :fit ,r°. c ,j° ?rF y t , j S~~ - t k- 4'-,53 _ s„ t t n+1 4.r P I - -i f F - - .1( A -ryb J r ' t' j . k -z"~ 4,--.. , ~ [a j t,itt'., , ~.r,t'_,~, ~ s fi F f Yi 7 - .r r rr - - t ' C - - - £ a 31 V, yA, ~t i I . . . , , ~ I I ~ ' ' - t _ ~ ~r ~ ~ . ~ , . _ F z,_y v _ 1-3 it -i X " - T f f ~ : ~ ~ 6 1 ~ " ~ , , I ~ - - . I , I . ~ 7 - I ' I - , , - - - M , ~ V Y F r ~r r.: E-Mi k 5 l+.,srr -Sd ty.a#'.v _ 4 ^ ° ^ .w.."_.w . s .-»a yy Y• xe 'Att ~ 4 Y r ts~ a- x 0 3, z tk~ t 10:00 p.m.~ 12. NON-AGENDA ITEMS -14 10:10 P.M. L - -z^ gfx xh.' ' 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go Into Executive r~ # 2i, ~1"17ai r Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), ax (h) to y F ~i t„ discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending N3 3 _ . _ s=3:_.*,=A litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are ~ confidential; therefore noshing from this meeting may be disclosed by those t .r present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this y session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. k d s rt t 10:30 p.m. P ;y z 14. ADJOURNMENT k 5 cca960813. DOC ~ t a 52- K 5t , , Az,r _ asp .u . 1, R, 4 - r rr xk- d Nk I~ fI u i `4d I~+y~ir„t.+"i~- { s zr ~ tiq lie, 4 t j x i ' COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 57h' f T c i rr'Y P ~r < 5 t F 7. ~r 4 ku"{`7?+3 ~ ~c ; N R~f" r ] J%Ri, `5 _ ~r k "i _ 3' - - - - - ~ - _ x a i S F "T" _ 5 3 't e0 r;°5.v ~K''.~' °.rv:.. °Tj k~ 3w<.`:' . to .a. t ti „.a*.i , s Agenda Item No. 3.1 ' g .t - i - l~Agatinn of q1io144 - t _ TIG RD CITY COUNCIL a f k r - MEETING MINUTES -AUGUST 13, 1996 vw x i r.;. e ,k ® STUDY SESSION' f' 4 - > Meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Council President Paul Hunt ~ - i ' € > Council Present: Council President Paul Hunt; Councilors Brian Moore, Bob t - Rohlf (arrived at 6:37 p.m.) and Ken Sche kla, g A > Staff Present: City Administrator Bill Monahan; Gary Alfson, Consulting- ; tf Engineer; Computer Services Network Manager Paul DeBruyn; Community s, z - , A ff " Development Director Jim Hendryx; Finance Director Wayne Lowry; Legal, Counsel Tim Ramis; and City Recorder Catherine Wheatley. R 7~' s - M > Update: Council Computers F I ! Paul DeBruyn, Network Services Director, presented the staff report. He x`* 1~ ' ~ . reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of the three types of computers - - . 3` - available, noting that each had similar capabilities. The three types of - , ' Z'.K~ ,~~u, - computers presented were a desktop model, a laptop model with an active ,s` ~ && ` h j - matrix screen, and a laptop model with a passive matrix screen. He -j', , ~ # rc is k mentioned that the desktop computer cost around $2,000 and the laptops ' u . t P, gg~ around $2,200 with the active matrix screens running about $500 more. Staff - ~ ~ ` e y t 4"` budgeted $6000. He recommended the laptop with the passive matrix screen. r s `oaf' .'-Ir'a .f sp.~ -s The Council discussed the potential use of laptops during Council meetings to 1 - 3 display the agenda packet, to access the Code, and to converse via e-mail. ~ _ r r L*y Councilor Scheckla noted a concern with conversing via e-mail during a public ,a , T meeting. _ Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel, addressed a public records question and stated k E that with any notes created on a computer in the context of making a decisionf on a public matter, a reasonable argument existed that those notes were public - 3 t during a publcvmised the eeting Council to use e-mail and the computers with caution r r y~ Council President Hunt noted that the budget allowed the purchase of only two y § laptops at this time, and asked how staff intended to handle the matter. Bill k I 1 Monahan, City Administrator, stated that they needed to make a decision on ~ that. He suggested evaluating who needed a computer at this time (some _ _ 4 , Councilors had their own computers) or increasing the budget or waiting a r; I year because prices were continually falling. k Discussion followed. Councilor Scheckla suggested waiting until after the r-' - n r election. Councilor Rohlf stated that he intended to use his own computer but <r - - F . < ' was interested in a high speed modem from the City. Councilor Moore said m ~ } that he could wait on getting a laptop since he had a computer at home. V' E ,j - x ' s ~ v COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 1 V E h x % r w" e } x~ _ c s - s 2 Y s, F P5 , E j ; , , _ , ; I - " , . - ! ~ . - , ' - ~ ~ . ~ - .1- I T ~k t 4 j ,.~-',;t,,t;-~~,~i,,~-,-~~,7~i~,;~F ~ I ; : ~ ~ I ' 1~ I i : ' ~ I ~ L , " " : : , :~n - , ~ ~ ~ " !'z ' - ~ - ~ I - ~ " ,,r,., . ~ - ~ P a . x - t^' 5 z t f f - _ yl a F. -'.:rte .1.- f_x... .i..__ 1_y -1- - , - , - L .u`Z '~TF9y,'~'q, l`.~ L 'fr. Y. '1 .j'y - _ - G 1 f - _ a.j..' - - - -ems a-Y a ~f~~- ~ # ; t § ~0 r2 3 ,I yr' } - C P S `kz, dd - r eye;-v°'•Ti F{. j ? X 5 l,~ 3 Councilor Scheckla asked for clarification on using a City computer at home ti t ' , w for non-City uses. Mr. Monahan said that staff expected a City computer at ' t home to be used primarily for City business. [s;k t. Mr. Monahan suggested that Mr. DeBruyn use a questionnaire and follow-ups j conversations with the Councilors to determine needs and priorities. Staff - s, would decide after the elections. t t i 4 - l f A~ • cps Councilor Scheckla asked for an update on he cramQra-_-- problems- problems- experienced N 3`Rc-r .G^tR"✓k ti "^z 4 at City Hall several weeks ago. Mr. DeBruyn reviewed how the servers and 'A back-up servers failed. The result was that Community Development and the ~ ~ j"k3. , -5 - h , z - 4 Finance Departments were without computer equipment for several days. He , ~ + k - x ~ report that not all problems are resolved; the manufacturer is replacing some 'AN -u ' .ace of the equipment. - T 0 J - if- fi tg, t.? i_ 7 - > Executive Session: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 7:05 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (3), & (h) to discuss r j - I -11 "~~'W~ ~11_1_-:M%~-',,-"- _,~'_l u labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation g ' , c S - n 3 issues. 1 > Executive Session adjourned at 7:10 p.m. t -1' -1 )Zg 'M - -T > Review: Proposed Changes to City Charter ,s 4 , i . ! _ ~ Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder, reviewed the five proposed changes to A , , ~ x -j _ n~ the City Charter. y The Council discussed the first change which to amend the method of electing G - s 4 r Councilors. Currently, Councilors file for candidacy by position number. M " The change would provide that candidates would file for the open positions k F { I (two positions would be available at the General Election every two years). I The two candidates receiving the highest number of votes would be elected. t ti Councilor Scheckla expressed concern that the change would open up the race s r ,Y 1 - to those with the money needed to campaign against the whole field whereas ' . r t running for an individual Council position limited the number of contenders -t , running against each other. He said that he could not support the change. !,"Y. x . ' Council President Hunt said that the change would reduce the chances of a _ group of citizens trying to oust a particular Councilor. He noted he initiated 'l ' ! ' this proposed change. l`-F"`'ten' ` 1 Councilor Rohlf said that he liked the idea of the top two vote getters getting h~ a + p } the seats, pointing out that a candidate whom a number of people wanted to is ° - I oust could still be elected in this method. He said that while he was ambivalent, he would support the change since he did not see anything wrong * ' a~i with it and he knew that it worked elsewhere. " ` a , i. rw x ~r- a a ' COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 2 1 F k ,_I y "r F'..srSN - JM F, _ i - ,r - 2 w K 7 C ~ { ,t} ti- , i V h Y C 4 - 9 t` C Chu k J _ _ _ L `A Y N F Y 3 C 'A _ 1 - T4 - k t „ - _ - - £'f+~ ¢ 5' { - - - - - - - - - - - i _ 1 a~ b s4 w R ~ " 3 4 ? r ` ? "'r Nat x fi_ 1 ' "FeC - Y - 1g ~,y' 3 ? sye4 rvG sy' - - 2' _ 4 _ 9 'z - k k j = A _ r -L'~''&-~' * xr vs 2 } t 4# t~'F' r t~ 'sta. i ,Y e - Councilor Moore stated that he could see advantages for but his preference - Z' _ , t ° leaned toward the existing method for election. Al a4 V_ Councilor Rohlf commented that it was easier to run a campaign with -U' 11 ® _ J t r 1' 1 individual positions because a candidate knew who and what issues he/she had z F V" j to address; otherwise a candidate had to address the whole field of candidates. - N- r . , ~l - Council President Hunt commented that with the Council positions, the least ~ i ` X z 14 - I qualified candidate could be elected because he had no opposition whereas two r strong candidates had to fight it out.; - , - § hearing on tAugu de2d7to wait to give staff direction until after the public s 4 a ! 11 -x ks Ms. Wheatley reviewed the second change of transferring the City Manager W 4~ position to the Charter from Sections 10 and 20 of the Code. 4 , I'll rum Y3~ - y a 'ti inF a „ i Council President Hunt objected to the statement in the ordinance that .the t ,a: y r r& ss,7*;va~h th Mayor appointed the City Manager, noting that the process used to hire Mr. w y Monahan involved an evaluation of the candidates and the entire Council voted - Ot t r on the final decision. He asked that the phrase be changed to appointment by - ~ x - _ A, ~ the City Council. i d rr ; 1 Ms. Wheatley reviewed the other changes, including updating the language in 0 the oath of office and making the Charter gender neutral. She reported that i fs ; , 4 " ' staff checked with the City Attorney's office in response to a suggestion during 3 -t y the previous discussion that the urban renewal clauses in the Charter be ~ fur'- - - . removed because they could not be used. As noted in the Council packet °e . ~ materal, Leg _ al Counsel Paul Elsner advised that the urban renewal financing t` aj r t u> . methods were still viable options available to the City. r- - The Council discussed the current Charter section on urban renewal. E Councilor Scheckla commented that feelings ran high in the City at the time of ` I' ' that vote. The Council decided to leave the urban renewal language in thet°r , ~ t - Charter. MF"I ~F t s ~ Eat's` ~r F t t > Agenda Review z t A ' II Mr. Monahan reported that staff opened the two bids received for Consent a5 s - 4~ a Agenda items 3.3a and 3.3b today. ' 3? 1 Gary Alfson, Consulting Engineer, reported that the City received two bids ~ 3 for the Main/Commercial Streets project and these bids were higher than r estimated.' n F He reviewed the funding sources and the scope of project for the, ' k ; Main/Commercial Streets project, noting that the bid overran the $560,000 - ' I allocated in the budget by $27,000. kT a . 'r 4 I%., COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 3 -ytl - t a ) -1 I v7 F - - - 3.s' F t 'S "FD' - - g- t .t iii - 11 4q, t F Y T+ A, } ? o- R b r - r - .yx-cy .v .:+'Y a _ -m.-~a d--Ma'c nv =e, ..~,r r k , 4 - 4 , ~11' It " - :L:~~ " - ~ , , ~ . I . ~ , , (~T' t k I - ~'~f~~.~ --~".yz~ "f _ - - , , : , r - J y-1 § ~ - . f -h l' - - J~ d }fi Yr _ R - t" - A 6 Y - "l' - - to Y 1'J F§ 9 J _ - _ _ fk 3 'J ( - ; /Y r r } n 77.. _t .Te- - 11 CT'a ,~.,-,fit a ,a. 1'- - - W _ '`xr - - - t -4 as c i 4 - Vn .T f - 1 - } ' x'{, X At{ -Y t Zak L _ _ t 4 ' 3 s. - '3R~r .l~p.,*i } un~.5.'.sc.Yi-w~..+<uks _ .........«rw.+ ue~.F. kY..-ih } t - Y` -R i 3 ~r 'N Y f yA , i rt - - r 1.,. * - ::I'~1 t~-! - _ 5%3:x::."'I:;L,.,. - { , Mr. Alfson reviewed the options available to the Council. He advised against ~ 5 , ~,~Z~~;lj-4A,--~, ~C- _V7, q r. r_', r-: ,_t..,.. -r-, readvertising the bids in the spring because the streets would further w; ; . deteriorate during the winter and cost more to repair next year. He § , -M s l ' recommended maintaining the scope of project for the Main/Commercial . I a € Streets project and use $27,000 of contingency money from the gas tax fund. } .,,a r - In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Alfson explained that a few contractors remained in the market for projects at this time of year; most r` { t ti-' other cities have already bid out their regular development projects.` r z _ r a F Councilor Rohlf asked why the City's bid was so late. Mr. Alfson stated that 1 ~j r-"r3 L y the main reason was the budget process was not finalized until July 1. $ - In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Alfson said that the ~ , liquidated damages in the contract were around $1,000 a day. ~ fs kr - u , Mr. Alfson reported that the bids received for the Major Maintenance Program t 4., R t - were also high. He advised against readvertising in the spring for the same t jq , t reasons as stated before. He recommended changing the scope of the project' 4 P ,x rather than funding the difference between the bid and budgeted amounts.3 µI x-, --Z. " n ? Mr. Alfson said that the contractor has agreed to eliminate two streets to bring t u j this project in at the budgeted amount. The completion date was also .._.3 November 15, 1996. 'a wW z.v - ` ,k MM'gTn Sap-. Councilor Rohlf asked why the engineer's estimates were low. Mr. Alfson 1t A ,R~ r { " climate. the estimates were based on typical prices during a good bidding ~ x* " " - _Za ~ . Councilor Rohlf suggested approving projects for a fiscal year in advance to t get a headstart on the bidding season. , - ` , Councilor Scheckla raised the issue of waiting on the maintenance program ~ until next year in order to get a lower bid. Mr. Alfson recommended ~ ' -M _ r proceeding now to avoid further deterioration of the roads which would result p ~ F; E i in increased costs next year. In addition, it would cost more for maintenance - 5 r 7 , f during the winter. ~ 5 x sf~z~ Mr. Alfson stated that staff would eliminate the two projects which were the d ' ?m- l ~ ' J . +i y;; f lowest ont he priority list: Cascade Avenue and 68th Street. f - q~' _ 3 y'ti > Non-Agenda Items $ 1}rf z j j Mr. Monahan reviewed the changes to Tigard's projected contribution to the w a joint project for the Cook Park gray water line, phase 2. f 4 E Mr. Monahan reported that he has returned the agreement with USA because t they sent a version with a term with which he did not agree. He said that the - - , 11 1~ t J City Attorney's office was working with USA's attorney to resolve the 11" ' ~ situation. F "t a -ya Y., { 6..- .11 ~ J l A--' i j[ V] COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 4 _ I'll -11 ~ I _l E Y ,y ice.. ! 1 q Y F i t r i - 'j, d ; 4 r,- £ ^P L :~'1 „~.3v`yw"',~"°' _ - _ I f! ha5A xi d - -Y e '9'-y~'"~ f - A x1` h ~ 'tea a - " ' + z - _ _ - t ss t a i - -e" i f 'a- P 3 - _ ,P - N 4 a - ~f W { ti, '2 4t . y pt - Y ' ' T ° - r' ,t F''. I s,M ac - 3 1 , " ~~,~,I'~ .t ,r f r r { y #r{. x T. 'F k!E J $ J { - b- y~,}~} 5 _,y - Wxt - e i , - - . ~ , ~.:t , - ~ ~ I I 11~.' " ~1:1_ - _~'-',:1--.;-?_ ~ Er ` 4 Y S t t'kz fits - s . $ 5-z, - Yx3~ 3 L y YF5 £ q _ " r p 7;?.,: *S, Z ''4 11 u'. m' x' -•---•__...~_,._v _,.__,A__ ~*su, - -,+.-4'' ice' cis,'` rr 3+3 a * ~F, c!t N- I -IN ,%Z ~ ; a t - 3 i'715 L -Ig,~ , Wit' ' _ .r,'4ti < ' t - WUN frv a Mr. Monahan noted a resolution honoring Randy Volk. * ; x,~ F r~. - a Mr. Monahan reported that the Mayor wanted to host a meeting of Mayors , and Count ._,,t~ - 5 " y Commissioners in September to discuss passenger rail service and - - h , „ -y other transportation issues. Staff estimated the cost for a catered event at i 4 $400. There was no objection.x f € t z Zi _ > Update: Ballot Measure 47, "Cut and Cap" „ - r £ s y - ; • , i This item was continued to next week. 1' * . 4 & LF, -A i 4. i3 ' 3 ; _ 1. BUSINESS MEETING ;std _ _ • Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1 r 2 9 FS } -F' r s Council President Hunt called the business meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. , t - a ~ ,-,t Lt~ f . r F t t x • Council Communications/Liaison Reports: None F ~ x ~1~ i • Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 4 'X { Mr. Monahan asked to move Item #11 up to just after the Consent Agenda, z , 4~ t, f Ron on the ~ Z's Item asked to add twoenon agenda uems: the reportook Park gray w tics er line and a He - ' resolution honoring Randy Volk. # _ - - "7 k 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA 4 > Curtis King, 12130 SW Pazkmoor Drive, King City, King City Councilor, _Q expressed concern regarding the paved pathway near Pacific Highway and Beef Bend xs - ~ fig Road. He said that even with a curb, the path looked like a road and cars were "f~ - , jumping the curb to use the road and it was dangerous for pedestrians. He said that ~s"~~ ;1 the vehicle STOP sign at this location was confusing. I ~~fLd6t£ 'A- Council President Hunt said that he brought this mailer to staff s attention several 7`-9 £ 1" f t:, ;0. aM 7 x y 3 weeks ago, and discovered that the County had jurisdiction. Jim Hendryx,~ n e Community Development Director, reported that staff reviewed the situation and ? found out that the County closed off the road that accessed Beef Bend Road but u~ neglected to remove the traffic sign. He referred the matter to the County but has not ' ti .1 1: # _ heard the resolution; he said he would check with the County to see where matters " i4t Mr. King requested the City to ask the County to install posts to prohibit cars from - r using the path. He also requested a "No Exit" sign.,' i a Z ~ fix ~ -1 > Betty Morgan, 10940 SW 79th, advised that she represented over 80 taxpayers ~ _ E 4 ~ whose homes were located on the intersecting streets on SW Pfaffle between Hall j: s q Blvd and 79th Street. She expressed concerns with traffic on Pfaffle, citing r 4 ,Z, r impending construction of 84 apartments (Carriage House Apartments) in the area. Y`w _ f, - ~ - - ~ r She said that the City has already granted Andrews Management Company a variance r to the City access standards that would make the traffic situation worse. ' f I , ' A ~i L_4 - COUNCII MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 5 r tvx= s r Al Fst r , Y 3 - 2 F - 5Lr. I Y ! - 3 l U *"RS3Y"i . _ . . - , , , " - " ~ , , ~ 1, ~ 1.11- " - w- , ~JR, , L , z , - " , r , - _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ J, _ . , ~ - I ~ , , ~ , -1~ ~~"",~~'!"~f,;fl"",~," - , , , -7 . J x 1 ¢ s } Y Y LL J Z t - - - ~ ~ , , ~ " ~ , , , ~ , ~ ~ .L , , , , , , `11~ , ffi j., -1 I .,-.,L~__-... - .r v1 t._ ._a _ s. c 1. - I 4-14' 1 - . - . 1~F-- . tsk' S3"T" rt i r - ' - . . - - - - ~ , - - - ~ - ~ , , ~ - , ' , z , ~ ~ j~.:~~ , I , * , " , I L -1 ~ "'-'~xr--.' T, " " - € - _ _ -4. r'' , , ~ , I - t ks 7 x~a `,ate ,?i - 7 ,r _ - 1 i i- - {53 n v 5 s_4 I I[, g Ms. Morgan said that the neighbors understood that this permit was granted based on _ ;1 "I ` an outdated traffic study that preceded the construction of Cub Foods and Costco. - z` 0 She expressed concern with emergency vehicle access during the peak traffic hours. r t She said the neighbors were not consulted by the developer of the apartments.`'" €'r = _ a _ She _ r t presented a petition with over 80 signatures requesting a neighborhood forum to a ~ i ` , discuss the development prior to commencement of construction. The petition also ti { t~ f - requested an updated traffic study of the area and any necessary upgraded traffic x x z t__ - controls. z , ` Council President Hunt asked staff for clarification on what the Council could affect 4=-1- c~ a on this decision at this point in time. Mr. Hendryx reviewed the specifics and ik,,t ,s , history of this development, noting that the site development review SDR , variance, x, - 3 ( ) ,3 A and lot fine adjustment were granted under staff administrative review following' uFt notice to the roe= S, n~,r p p rty owners within 250 feet of the site. He said that the Planning Commission heard the appeal of the SDR and variance last week; they were appealed - x4°' V'I~ ` on compatibility issues pertaining to construction of wall or fence on the adjacent ' 4 ~ property line. - fi Mr. Hendryx said that following the final order, the Council could call up this matter z= a I ; under its review process, even though it has gone through the appeal process. Ms. ; 34 Kb- i Morgan presented her notice of the final order. Mr. Hendryx said that the Council " 1. .3 had to call the matter up for review by August 22. Mr. Monahan suggested that the = ~ ~ K ~ i Council consider whether or not they wanted to call this up for review at their study zf ' ~ 8 r, III - session on August 20. f;- > . % a - 1"'+~ Mr. Hendryx pointed out that the public could still appeal the decision even if Council t.,' ~4' r.~ts a Y - - ~d chose not to call the matter up for review. ; -r R.= g x ci e.aF Councilor Rohlf asked for clarification on the process. Mr. Hendryx explained that f. R w4 f a r the application was appealed on a single issue and the Planning Commission restricted >a ~+~e a testimony to that single issue (the issue of fencing). f~ ~ +r a ~'r~ r Ms. Morgan commented that many more people were affected by this development ~ - - than the property owners within 250 feet of the site. She asked for broaden i notification of the neighborhood. i ~l` _ ; > Edward Metzler, 13267 SW Bull Mountain Road, presented a formal written 6 , E complaint regarding the final authorized plans for the Foran subdivision. He stated + that the compromises reached at the September 26, 1995 Council meeting were later a . modified by the developer and staff. He cited a new alignment in the proposed road 3~ that would affect his future development plans for his property because it cut off a - ' l~ t section of a corner on his property. y L t= f - xz i ~ U" i k~rr... Mr. Metzler stated that Arthur Picullel committed to saving certain trees and that staff - i y was directed by the Mayor to work toward saving those trees at the September S £ ''"7 1 meeting. He said that all those trees were removed; a permit was granted to Mr. ' - s dl Picullel to remove all the trees on the site. 4 _S k 9 ~ t, - - GY , t 3 I S : COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 6 wf." ~j zT, - 4 h t k s a aR t w q r r ' #,J' g} C i $ S J S t - rr jl 'd 7£r r - ,F ~ f id 3,- 7 h`Y - f} ^..w'z^r+ "ii Y, -o+ J.J*[ ^ _ :«g _ ) tj f } a Q --.1 i j ~A t 7fi 1 - b } 4 _ Y rYr 1- err a t b ' - x ~ , x r t r t_ K a~ - - - - may- ~?~r^.,..T-~-r~„S _ ?-.tee-Y"w~..__ ...r. ~~,z~~ ..-"i. .-F..-.. ..a.. ~r-.-. .._~.._e_ •1 r.r: _ ..,~e_.:.- - YL:. i _~e._-.v - L. , - .~_Y - - - o ....-~,_.L.~~ { - - - - - - if - - g _ t tW S _ - s f C ~;Z 11 T . 'l3'z~'F.'C y..J i' - - - - - ,i t h., {y` g .5? X - - - , s- ''~-e _ F 1 v. Y - a s e_w~ f^xxa gam- - , 3 - ~ ,r^, - _ r lYt "A'4 5$4"'t9 e4 4T 1'F. - K Fp d < .Iw.S }k . p * Mr. Metzler stated that he was not allowed to voice any of his concerns at the special F A ~ , ,r - - ,t ,1 r ~ Council meeting on July. 29, 1996. He requested a formal hearing per Section i 4 11 , - 18.24.04 of the City Code. .~i N + i J r s r sit - m Mr. Ramis stated that Mr. Metzler was advised by staff on the proper procedure for y - reviewing these situations; Mr. Metzler submitted a letter to the Planning Director F that would trigger the review process as stipulated in the ordinance. i. > Vlasta Barber, 11120 SW Summerlake Dr., on behalf of the Executive Board of the v W t tt 3Y i Tualatin Chapter of the National Association of Retired Federal Employees, thanked r '~.`~r; ~,,ars~,, the Mayor for proclaiming February 22 as NAFRE Day. She noted that the p- } , A_F FZ'IT E proclamation was reported in the NAFRE magazine. She thanked the staff andM.s x~;, Council for the work they did. " ~,(¢jL, ry .Fv' \ 1 ` 1 `mac gb'i j 'W,?!-" w" L ;ii 3. CONSENT AGENDA ~ =1 - y' s r, LL„ A - > z _ ,n-Q, Mr. Monahan noted the updated figures on the bid awards for Items 3.3a and 3.3b. - r 1 - -11 Councilor Scheckla requested that Item 3.4 be removed. L ~ k,` -c i i °f ir2'1~ I- _2 -Ili ; I. rte , c a ~ 5 ! Council President Hunt asked for clarification on the City taking jurisdiction over , Durham Road from Hall Blvd to Boones Ferry Road in order to put a stoplight at °f++`-' = _ _ - 79th Street. Mr. Monahan said that that was correct; the intersection did not warrant = x~ , ~ a a signal per state standards and if the City wanted a stoplight, the City must accept I ` k ~M - the transfer of jurisdiction. . Council President Hunt noted that they needed the stoplight to protect the children p*, k 74~ k aI { crossing the street but that it meant an operations and maintenance cost of $18,000 t= : K, per year. Mr. Monahan commented that the City also received control over the E traffic signals at Hall and Durham and at Durham and Booties Ferry. xk4 _ r ; ~ - i, " -Z Ka.: ~ ? to-`5 h;bhp# b pri Councilor Moore asked for clarification on the bid costs for Items 3.3a and 3.3b. i Mr. Monahan explained that Item 3.3a was $578,523 (Main and Commercial Streets) r:° ' and Item 3.3b was $355,769 (major maintenance program). He said that they were x ~ L,35 - t f eliminating Cascade Blvd and 68th Avenue from the maintenance program in order to ~ ~ , ,`i,, - , I 3r remain within the budgeted amount. x t R a Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to approve the % ~ k- Consent Agenda, removing Item 3.4. x 4~ F - Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Council , - A x r President Hunt, Councilors Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes. r zx 4`~, § . -1 3.1 Approve City Council Minutes: July 9 and 16, 1996 n 3.2 Receive and File: - ` , a. Council Calendar b. Tentative Agenda " - ~ , 1` _ { I . !r/ COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 7 - z 7 z-xci-f fl a - ,.a. +4 F e "°""^°7i:^% •yc'*i?>.iy,..,-~''q -f Shy 4 1 k r - S - - - eSGS- `+j F k tq 1 - - t q t- I g t k - I U . , Z , ~ f" : 1 , " ~ ~ : : : ~ I I , , , - , : - `~,-~7' L , ; ~ L 4 F - { f {<F-r t Y _ y 5 { d _-td 7h _ - n 'mss - t - 1 i• _ - - T "i k r ~G T 1 L a .gib S 5f t - F - ~ - 144-gg 4N;` n4 y n x _ W. it ..3 €r s # ,r £ IN ; , - ~ t - - Ott- `7 t - r t » a. s-t,". i $ Ct v -j 2 , - - C„- i z fr Ri ' j '4 s-t. .W...._._.,....._.~.w..,-_.:uw.._... -.a....,._._._.. Y.'i .ciF sf°'-t~ N t? Z- ~ ,r r - ~5a p i t ' r 4 - 3.3 Local Contract Review Board: j .i V s a. Award Contract for Construction of the Main Street/Commercial Street r ~r"~ -71 - F- ai - Reconstruction Project e , r g ' b. Award Contract for Construction of the 1996 Major Maintenance $ a s _ Program ' - 3.4 Approve Historic Application Fee Waiver Request from the Tigard Chamber Fj r - - - of Commerce { t r u 3.5 Accepi Transfer of jurisdiction of a portion of Durham Road from the Oregon - W ~ ' i Department of Transportation t _ a 3 s Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion t ' " " ' ~e-i !IW71~_ 3.4 Approve Historic Application Fee Waiver Request from the Tigard ~'`t, i, - Chamber of Commerce i, r Councilor Scheckla asked that a condition be imposed stipulating that F 4 - T ,h k the City would receive any revenue collected for parking on City - k' u` * ~ property. z~ 4T iii W, i. r ~A <=m " n . r s . Mr. Monahan reviewed the City's intent to build a parking lot on its x - i+w* 2~, „ = n i removed of Hthe e said that the request Garden c for the building fee l waiver r " v tonight was solely fo t, on the historic designation. He noted that Council has given direction that the City receive all the revenue generated b the City- _a by owned , x b property A, ~ Q qr3 x X y Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to approve the Historic Application Fee Waiver Request from the - Tigard Chamber of Commerce. t } - a~ - , z I r a Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. 3= - ;t (Council President Hunt. Councilors Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") , f~ Xis f I > The Council considered Agenda Item No. 11 at this time. i ~ 7 c~~ _ f 4 -ri` 5q„ y 't F 4 y > Report on the Olympics ;111 ~ ~ Nk- a x , f r ~ E I ,I m a Council President Hunt commented that Chief Goodpaster volunteered to use his zs 1 i vacation time to serve on the security force at the Olympics. 1, t 11 ~.j 'G t i _ ^'a a7 . ..^~igC ir[ Police Chief Ron Goodpaster reported on his month long participation in the Security 1. " 1 11 - ~ - 11 Team Program at the Atlanta Olympics; this involved 1300 officers from 45 _ <y = ~ " at - countries. He said that as a Security Section Leader, he was responsible for setting} k = s up and coordinating the security at the public access points, the athlete arrival point, n ~ ~ a = s ~ inside the concourse and the arena for the basketball venue at Morehouse College. 5+ , He explained the security procedures and equipment used. y ~-3 1 =mf Si t'£ v' 5fi~3 1 k x Tr S' zd air- aY tt ` COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 8 ' _ ~~t. 'E ` {Y >,'i: N ~ fir, U n 11 t - Y i y 6+ § 'M,& ~ az+ fr ~Yi 1-1 4 f - J -i-fit x iYS E -rte t; F33 ( { °`m^.'^"^°T^*°"'a20' ke^Y CSC 1'Y:*.+✓+. - - f r- V 11 Yxv)t _ -a r xn~~ _-~;;~,4~ . - L2 ~ ~ , , , . , , , A , - - d i % t y 2d r e f Y -tJ ~f- 6 ~ H , 2 itr -a _ r v k - a o- ~+...,-,-,<<•- F,.;~..r,-tea= s ,r!=-'d 5- i , - r _ . k . _ ,r t, d Y !101 - U i j,'g5 -°A T 1J - F - - y - # i t I ~ $ t > 4 R:t „3 -fit ! 1 , _ ...r,. s, -h` '*4 is t. - n-_ - - .,-e - ......-.-.-..r...-.,.sx...:i.T...eXa..s. r3iC~LYNa;~t},yy i' 1 - "~'-4} } b 7 { f ` xTt' 4 ft - F t C T- E Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of Council present. y k - kla voted "ycs. Y (Council President Hunt, Councilors Moore, Rohlf and Schec ; , - { F a 3 ,v , t -1, 6. CONSIDER ORDINANCE -ADOPTING ANNEXED PROPERTY DESIGNATIONS J ` i • Staff Report l 1, wif _ C Y _ -i Mr. Hendryx presented the staff report. He reviewed how certain lands within h . the City remained at the County designations due to the Boundary Commission k `x ` a K" ~ y annexation process. He said that the intent of these ordinances were to give l = f r ` n those properties their proper City zoning designations. He said that this was zx ' in accordance .h rt,__ Urban Planning Area Agreement between Tigard and t- s Washington County. I- Iff"7 V ~ 11, ~ a Staff explained that separate ordinances were needed to amend the r T , , Comprehensive Map and the Zoning Map. z - ~ ~-yM • Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 96-30 and Ordinance No. 96-31 t""~t _ ti y r i°t, l' ~ F ar ' ) The City Recorder read the number and title of Ordinance No. 96-30. ' '-KO ORDINANCE NO. 96-30, AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING ~ 7 , ,T g s % 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONS FOR PREVIOUSLY 1 'W~ ; 5 % ANNEXED PROPERTY. - t z Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Z' '2'~_ { V Ordinance No. 96-30. k WI?,; f aT - 'AT Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of Council present. ` O 3.,-.I (Council President Hunt, Councilors Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") XR1-.~14 'N,;,~- The City Recorder read the number and title of Ordinance No. 96-31. - ~ , M' S - x t r ORDINANCE NO. 96-31, AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING DESIGNATIONS, " FOR PREVIOUSLY ANNEXED PROPERTIES. - Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt ` t 4~ # f. n Ordinance No. 96-31. y ~ - I Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of Council present. L t , cy _ t (Council President Hunt, Councilors Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") r 7. PUBLIC HEARING - (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - VACATION OF i V % o ~ "t i i r APPROXIMATELY 6,445 SQUARE FEET OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY = ak z a LOCATED ON SW 135TH AVENUE O~ °',4 r The request was initiated by the City Council on June 11, 1996, Any interested e - , % person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacation of said public c Rz ° Reco der by August 13~t 1996 by 30 prenmonstrances shall be filed with the City t p ~ , Wa . 0 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 10 ~ xr_ ar - i'✓ ; of f r i' L 5L " 7 - r - ` !rr.k 4 F 2h 4 - ; 3 f - } f 's 1k+' s- - - 'x-+. 777 _ ?4 mn^.-n 90 m-- - -~w~„ d "t py kwy t~ `v- I ttC c„ _ _ _ x -tY = i 4 1 A'=f^ I i jt r ` ' -11-1$, E 1!"---'r :`-~,,~------'-~~"'1'11' - ~ - . ~ ~ , ~tY- t - X. { T: I / Z S E .4 I t i 7 r 1 " , E - , - -t ~ , 1 , ~ , " , 1,'0,6,, - - - - _ ..y L, - T~ J ' f - - 'ti' -A, F,-- ' , ~ .'_':'-f ~~'~L.~'.~~l , , _1 _ , . . , ~ . - , ~ ~ I - . , ~ ~ ~ - r , R _ I - "l - - . - -'~r ~ Z ~i "7,t ~.'."~i"' - , '-_N.'T'-5'x~~'-'. , -:.z>p 5 J. .r ~ - c r'1 _ - i.-.. ~ ~ izO sue., 5 e ➢ - S^,,. d3 " t 3t _ - a. Council President Hunt opened the public hearing and read the hearing r ~.z c - ` - - - criteria. c , ' I I 11 - 4 F - - g b. Declarations or Challenges: None t ` , w ~ r} +k ; ' c. Staff Report r ti- dr t - Mr. Hendryx presented the staff report. He stated that this request for , - T s vacation of public right of way was in conjunction with the construction of the „ o- ~ Castle Hill No. 2 subdivision; SW 135th Avenue was realigned to provide a T- ~ g s -%d f~ .111, - " intersection at Walnut. He explained that the right of way would revert to the s_; r five adjacent property owners listed in the staff report. He recommended that n I the Council approve the vacations 7 d. Public Testimony - n - . ~ ~ - Li, .'C t . 'PU- ° I,t Cindy Buckingham, 13428 SW Scottsbridge Drive, expressed concern about m1 --I I how utility companies would access the water and phone lines for repairs since ' . - k -11 ' they would have to go through her backyard. She asked if the fire hydrant g behind her fence would be moved. t Rte - k1 Councilor Moore raised a question about the provision of utilities in the area - and the access easements needed for maintenance and repairs. Mr. Hendryx < , said that he would have Engineering research the questions of whether or not f' i ~ the utilities would remain, and if they remained, how they would be accessed. ? r Fri He also noted that if the City had to create easements to access the utilities, it tp P , would be easier to do so before the City vacated the land. , . - , s The Council directed that this item be set over to August 27, 1996. I i ' ' ` ` ' 8. PUBLIC HEARING - (LEGISLATIVE) - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Y~ ` 'Xr AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-0002 AKA BUSINESS SERVICES (set over from the ^ r ` ; w July 9, 1996 Council Meeting) 1 ~ 4 _ REQUEST: Amend the text of policy 12.2.1(2)(1a) of the Comprehensive Plan to s x" r modify the spacing and locational criteria for General Commercial land uses. LOCATION: City Wide. ZONE: N/A. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: a ( Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11 and 12; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies u,~ t 1.1.I(a), 1.1.I(c), 2.1.1, 5.4, 6.1.1, 8.1.1 and 12.2.2; Tigard Community !"T. .I `f r 1.2 11 Development Code chapter 18.30; and Oregon Administrative Rule Chapter 660,' s t'`~1 r 1 # ' s Division 12. ' 6 qy j "',15 i - ' C ? a. Council President Hunt read the hearing tide and opened the public hearing. b. Declarations or Challenges: None 7 r t c. Staff Report ~ t , r ' t r s~ X4 1,,rT xi,.S ' ~ Mr. Hendryx distributed written submittals. s v!' - x2 X t Nels Mickealson, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He said that f , the policy under consideration was one of the criteria used to analyze and 1 ~ , t F s evaluate the Comprehensive Plan map amendments that proposed the f r f .~k, ~ ~ ' s , } „.v COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 11 a 4" - ¢ r i f r rp 4 , _ -I- 4 4 2 .A' r' _ry'`°xT£ r 2'Y kx t'[..z ysr F ^ s - Y ;J 5 r 2 r c t r E e -J~' SL x r' i v x [a '~11~"-l".1--', --.,"-,,--,,.,.",~,'~"I.-~".' : - A ~P ~ - r F h t - - - z xrk e - x A ' r; K'x i- M 7 _ - % .?f 4 - ~ q I ~ I - ~1' . I ~ I , ~n ~ - ~ ~ - I I ~ ~ ; I : ~ 1: ~r - I - - 1, . I I ~ ~ _ r , , , . _ .1 1. ~ I ~ i I , ~~r'-~ ~x--' ~ - I I ~ L ~ - ^T- ITT _ _ I _ _ _ - v , t ~ I ~ , . ~ , , - ~ ~ ~ , .1 - I ~ ; , ~ . . I I ~ ~ - . 70 ~ n z x - x i4w a @® z -.^3, - - _ - I - - _ .-"kK PST - et - ,14 9 X - str5 6 - Q R - 4 T - - _ _ 5~ -V- S ~S _ .--e-~++.vn~...tu,..,_e_. - . ....~...v_ r..-...~wwwieri~'riJ'a:.w`u~ic++«t wro - { - t -i 1--- ,W -r r _ rR - - ; 1L _ a e redesignation and rezoning of land to allow for General Commercial (CG) ,s- uses. He pointed out that it had citywide application. - e a4 L i - - Mr. Mickealson reviewed the existing plan policy that stated the criteria was z 11V -1 t "to be construed in a flexible manner in order to accommodate proposals that - i were found to be in the public interest," and which stated that a commercial - " X77 - area could not be "surrounded by residential districts on more than two sides." , d Mr. Mickealson reviewed the proposed change to the policy, summarizing it as 4+ , " ' , "the existing restriction would still apply to new commercial areas but existing ~E + j commercial areas could expand if the Council found all of four criteria." t,` .r These criteria were 1) the expanded commercial area was not surround a by T,1 11 I'll, R-l, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 or R-7 districts on more than two sides; 2) the !F~ increased commercial area would not adversely affect the surrounding residential districts; 3) the size of the increased commercial area would allow { an appropriate buffer to be provided between the uses allowed in the .1,11 11 ~ commercial district and the uses allowed in the surrounding residential district; ` z, and, 4) the increased commercial area was the minimum size necessary _ required to allow the appropriate redevelopment of the existing commercial ,r area. 4 # ~ F , i"~ j Mr. Mickealson explained that the applicant, AKA Business Services, Inc., , -z- s - N . t owned a parcel with split zoning of CG in the front and R-12 in the back. He ' said that the property owner believed that the current policy could prevent him 'l ° ° L - y s.' t, from expanding the CG portion of his site into the multifamily Portion; , - ~ " C therefore, he has applied for this legislative text amendment change. "s < > r # Mr. Mickealson stated that the proposal did not meet all the relevant criteria, e 1 ?cg, ' including State Goal 10 Housing. Because this proposal would allow the me z r : expansion of CG into multifamily residential areas, it reduced the City's k~s . F opportunities to make available housing units at various price ranges and rent ~ ~ levels, and to allow for flexibility of location, type, and density of housing. s,- - f `z v~ - Mr. Mickealson said that Comprehensive Plan Policy 5.4 was not satisfied l 3aF because this proposal would facilitate the expansion of commercial areas into r ` ~~,s~ zl~ _ , j residential districts (which was prohibited by the policy). He said that Policy # 6. 1.1 was not satisfied noting that although the amendment itself would not - ' k_t & cause the City to drop out of compliance with the Metro housing rule, it would ;.r~ i result in the incremental loss of housing opportunities for the City to provide a r 4rx diversity of housing densities and types. r , _ , t 5 w" 7 Mr. Mickealson said that regarding Policy 12.2.1(2)(1a), the spacing and '°r= ? tJ t location criteria, the proposal would hold single family and multifamily residential areas to a different standard. He stated that staff believed that these i'" ~ areas should be treated equally if the City's intent was to protect all residential areas. --f,- ,,'."-,"~,',`x~,_!!,,:~~ , -;~~-~,i',it~, "[111-- 1 Mr. Mickealson reviewed the notice sent and responses received. He said that - 3 t ODOT chose not to comment because they evaluated only parcel-specific , . I COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 12 1 z { Ig l rt k 1, I .m ~J f d 3 S ;y -Floe ~ - so,a-..-..-., 1 4 _ s -v.°^w.w, rE y=:i -L t~3 - _ f _ - - - - E V ~r J - „ - - • - - d - A . aj x, , LF - ~ E .T1 74 S - - - , r ~ S - - -h r 4 t - - ; 'F' 1 J ,w - `L t ;0 k E ~ ~ . . , - , . - ~ - ~"_--i,,~ , ~ , ilvs . a.. _ .z L.. -.r._.i 1 _ L11 _ ,1._..:S -.c uSr.....~~w . .-i._ r!.~ - _t_. i z-T . 1 _ e - _ _ _ - ye y-- r - y _ _ _ _..t g ,5,!775KN_""~~- - ~ . ` p- , - - A F - , , , - - 3 vtY - y _ - WE , r~ p -s ..-.a...._ u..,....,...y.=~...,wmS..,s.....:.n„-:ate- - _ Ct'T'1_,~ v,s `W hr;- M -,ji Y r i i 4 -was, s- I , _ - amendment requests for compliance wide ine Tlarispollation Planning Rule, s-',* t r Metro saw the proposal as permitting a greater mix of uses in Tigard and _ fi E = , ' " supported such efforts; however, Metro had no guidelines for reviewing cities' Mr. Comprehensive Plan amendments. s_'_ ` z - t v - - r_ Mirkralcpri said that only the Central-West (iT a%nracewA rpnregj ahnaj ~ N_ x - j the proposal; they suggested that the applicant pursue a rezone via the quasi- - r F 3 judicial route first. The Planning Commission recommended denial by a vote 3 I of 5-2 at the June 17, 1996 hearing. He said that the planning staff 1° ,s - 111.i t recommended denial because the applicant has not met all the applicable 4; j review criteria nor has he made a convincing argument that the amendment 4 $x r 1 was beneficial to the Cites T4- nninted out that the applicant - r could apply iw for 3 i I' r - a'te'"'-~ rezone on the property and argue for interpretation of the policy in a flexible g x ' : yr manner. ° , - tom' ,'.rv-,y ' - N Y I Mr. Mickealson reviewed three examples of how the proposed amendment _il _1K would affect different areas in the City. I - I -i~`.~ .fig d. Public Testimony I rk - " PROPONENT I Y ` _"yS }l ' Mike Robinson, 900 SW Fifth Street, Suite 2300, Portland, represented the h 7 applicant. He stated that he disagreed with Mr. Mickealson's assessment that the . ~a~;~ w~ examples he showed would not be allowed under the current locational criteria. He M _ l argued what the "construing in a flexible manner" clause might allow them. He said " s! 1. I- f, 11 that adopting this change would not mean that any given parcel could be rezoned - , , more easily because the Council had to find that the four criteria have been met. He k;- - I'll ; A J,q - c contended that this change would make it easier for all parties to make the judgment ' `''`x;zza u G f call in those instances when a commercial site was surrounded on more than two sides'- r by residential. ' , s r w = ° . i 9 - may, '".yY Mr. Robinson pointed out that this was a legislative text amendment and did not apply L to a particular parcel. He said that it was not unusual for a text amendment to apply g- E I citywide. He reiterated that the proposed language did not apply to new commercial , N ,I , ~ - k areas, but only to existing commercial areas. any ~ t Mr. Robinson stated that the Tigard Code already distinguished between single family " I :10- t~ F and multifamily districts, citing the lack of a criterion requiring buffering from ' 'I j adjacent commrcial areas for igh density residential ares wile such criterion x € ° i existed for low density residential areas.?' W t - r{?,. - f A h J § ~-hv" Mr. Robinson reviewed three reasons why the Council should approve the text; amendment request. He said that the proposal was an improvement of the current Y policy giving the Council clear criteria to use in making judgment calls on residential j - t E surrounding commercial on more than two sides. ~r{ Mr. Robinson said that the proposal did not really change the current policy because G, m the Plan already allowed the Council to construe the policy in a flexible manner; he i i - -1 s k . F ~t COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 13 # f T [ t _ t_ t ^v t f n, a r d .1 z N ~ ` ~ _ ' ~ ~ a ~ s p r'°aT,R_ f } _ _ qsa - r z 'k ' a t x _ q j r5~ F~ y 6 d ,1 r - t 4 F „ L..~. - 3. 1 _ Fe S i E - - 5 ;c`. - - i - 1 t _ _ ! S 1 5 Y j r k 3 tE , .f` ,,k r t S t 14 -t~ b-i t 7 f - k G r y t . , , ~ ~ ~ I - , , - ~ ~ I ~ , . . ~ ~ , , , - ~ , , I - A - F 7 it F '-'FZ'f ir.JT~ - n--.'S.-,":_-._: r'~-~_'_'+qS~.-T+1'JR2 ` ~`--r+ "4` } < .c -1 s- r Y y e ~ ~ .+i spa r - ff T t ~ ~ S _,e.:,`d-=,ma=r"+°-:"z:=0.3`=,•.`.%e .7 - - a contended at the current policy lacked clear criteria, that certain terms in the policy z V 7, were ambiguous and that the language placing a greater burden of proof on a ¢ a " development with a greater impact was difficult and impractical. j Mr. Robinson stated that this proposal would not make it easier to change the Comprehensive Plan map designation of a residential property to commercial but would make it easier to identify those instances when it would be in the public interest to have commercial surrounded on more than two sides by residential. - ` Mr. Robinson stated that while the current language applied citywide and allowed any - new commercial areas to use the "flexible manner" interpretation, this proposal left an i airtight standard for the new commercial areas and provided strict criteria for the expansion of existing commerciai areas. He asked that the Council approve the a ~vFS r request. OFIK ]i°4 F '"E 3 t - OPPONENTS I Martha Bishop read her testimony opposing the text amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. She said that the applicant could achieve his plans through the quasi-judicial process without changing the current requirements for single family„r fh. 'Y'y zoning citywide. She noted the existing conditions near Watkins and Grant Streets at 110th, and spoke against the encroachment of commercial on established rR' neighborhood residential areas on minor collectors. She said that safety for G `'Y~ N, n homeowners and the children should be the top priority. She noted the exact location - r ?3 i F - . as z of the commercial area on Hwy 99W near Watkins. She mentioned that CG and commercial could not be placed on a minor roadway. cM a" w`r 41, Duane Myer, 13210 SW Watkins, read his testimony opposing this proposal. He k mentioned that the Planning Commission has already studied the many factors 's si*< s - 5 involved in this application and recommended denial. He asked that the Council deny A T+ the proposed change and suggested that the property owner settle his request without a e cY E~ y affecting the whole City of Tigard. - Y , RE Y icrs4 S Tammy Bustin, 10670 SW Dairy Dell Court, representing herself and her husband, stated that approving this amendment without knowing the impact of it on each <a residential neighborhood in the City was unjust. She spoke for the Planning x~ n Commission evaluating the affected properties on an individual basis in order to _ rip- analyze fairly the impact on each neighborhood. She noted the detrimental effects on mks r ' safety in her area caused by the increased commercial traffic using Hollywood Video; people have discovered that Watkins was a cut-through to Hwy 99W. She said thatr residents could no longer safely walk on their street nor allow their children to use the bike paths; motorists drove on the pathway to avoid the speed hump. Mrs. Gustin said that residents were not happy that this proposal could potentially affect so many properties. She reiterated the dangerous traffic situation caused by cut s,- through traffic. She suggested that AKA Business Services pursue his concern on am } ^ individual basis and leave the rest of the City out of it. ' x Y f y 9 c COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 14 t3 J ^T a " r xr ~ C 44 d t r * # dE r ~ $ t 3, A i•....•n..Pn..+ ,„n§W"aT».;"K'yE.i'r "R'Iw.n'a 7, 4- } { ~ jI f t 3 Y to ' ,g I [ - f - S f[ -I - t 3 t - f t N 11t[-~~~ ~ J rp a Y '4 F f J7 d ) 1 - 1 _ 7 7 _-r.v" - P yt-" - - _ ,F. t - - - - - b 9 l _fr~ t ,.!-K ~ * WVIIIW~Al~k~il,,, eR51~'.-';', - ~ Fi,-, ~;i; ~f ~ ~ , , ~ ~ I ~ 7 - ~ - . ~ ~ I ~ - , , * . , P ~ ~ ~7; -,',%0-.-,~-"--;~ , i~ , '_"i-i.-~~, ~i , 'S"',. ' ' i, _ - _ 3 4 -t' -ice - n ~+.Yp£ 'Glt1~ - 2 ~ . ~u~mYm T a.a.~.._~-ie.. ..-._.~wbrut'o..w.-.._ . ~.....o~~~u~..mu~~w`+b1.4 tee..- = F ~4C'- .TE ry.S✓- tsst~ S 1 t4 s x tea} - h fM1k .j ii _ -6 Y- . 7 Mr. Hendryx distributed a letter submitted by Mr. Kleinman. , `X - { ~ :V Jeff Kleinman, 1207 SW Sixth Ave, Portland, an attorney representing Northwest ; .k Retail Services, said that this letter was a revision of his fax earlier today, in which & l some material :vas deleted. 3 ~ ` e-~ --fir t} - a Mr. Kleinman spoke in support of the staff and Planning Commission's 3 vx recommendations to deny this proposal. He said that while Mt. Robinson has, r , _ 74 , attempted to address the problems, he concurred with previous testimony that the _ application did have a citywide impact and that it was a matter of grave concern to 1 ' make the change without analyzing each of the other sites that might be affected. He _ ~ -a - x agreed that the AKA Business Services property did have a problem but argued that a x - pia; 44 citywide amendment was not the way to deal with it. t„ Tg 4 r - . 11 11 Mr. Kleinman said that the proposed amendment had an inherent impact in addressing F-x l the statewide and city planning goals by making it easier to site commercial where = = j multifamily currently existed. He said that the impact on the City's inventory of residential properties was a grave concern. He stated that the Code did not say that - - Kam. multifamily residential was entitled to lees protection than single family from intnisinn . s ~v - by commercial. ~ SE Ka- r~ t ` Mr. Kleinman said that the impact of the proposed amendment included some r ~ 1j-Y - potential domino effects. He pointed out that while the amendment did distinguish rr s , , , - , l .4 _ between new and existing commercial areas, it did not take into account that once a t r ` 11 I commercial area received its designation, it became existing commercial and the 1 r 1 ° " t proposed amendment would apply. He noted that once one site in the City qualified £ S under the four criteria, precedent was set and people would use the argument of ~ ' r+.' Ai- Ai s precedence to get the same benefit for their property. t ; -5 ~ 5 ~ Y x~ 1 = Mr. Kleinman stated that they did not find that the four criteria listed provided gx a~ ft 1, ` adequate protection at the next level of quasi judicial amendments. He contended that ~r the criteria were vague and unclear and called for subjective judgments. He said that 4 it would be challenging to apply the criteria in a consistent manner on a case by case - z r ~ basis. He stated that the proposal only resolved a problem for this applicant on this one site while it created a possible multiplicity of future problems. . c r ~ ,-mil- * 1 M 5 Mr. Kleinman said that they did not find that the proposal resolved any problem with the locational criteria as presently written because nothing in the proposal removed the "flexible manner" provision. ~ £ 1; Mr. Kleinman categorized the applicant's arguments as "the proposed amendment is i a i harmless because..." He concurred with staff that there has been no demonstration t [ . that the proposed amendment was either needed by the City or beneficial to the City 4-z w as a whole. He said that they did not oppose a later site specific application but held e i „ F ' that this was legislative change did not have a sound basis. I, a e. Public hearing was closed. P C . 5 - k }f' , ` Li COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 15 1 ,,,d w`z k k d N` ~i~ 7 -7 1 _ h r^ y : - , '~-,",%,'i'% _~,31~ ~ ] I ~ -,,,r~ , - ;p. S S 'I 7 1' ~ E r q 7 ~M' b _ f --.4 t~ k - f F, ,t - 5~ ti y 7 ? 't- - - - - -Y , ; Z i - 3; f X _ - - - A M { 'a 1' I Y - , S k 5 y~- N _ i` - I k - i - iL. f f..' 2 tE ! ~ I - - rte. r- _ is _ __._.-~:i: _ . ..,:,,__c-_, t i _ -r. u_v_rt.-._~. .R, I . f F = < ~J r-a- 7- - _y*~ 3"3 ~t F.tn. S ~ wit - N Yi rr ! ,,3 s y i Y $ x ask Zr ~'p, sil` _ _ ...3... E 3., 3-`ss h.'~..~-. Y~ly.?i ark - -s s~ l~.,,•~ 4~ 43y by-f - x :aSa its sew ptr,r , rx r yz - zttc 11 , asa 4 ~ - R ess f>M t , f. Council Consideration: , ' g 1' Rohlf said that he liked the idea of tight standard to justify Code decisions, 1.s , - ` i - commenting that it was difficult to justify some of the decisions based on the ; - 's ` t a: I" ambiguous charts in the Code. He said that while clarity for the developer from the p ; 1 - a ,i i I C;ry would " an --provement, he did n see any reason to change the status quo. F - s >`3 A° 4 - - He said that he agreed with some of Mr. Kleinman's comments that the applicant's 1 ~ I # d _ ~r:_'"f rx""' = arguments were that the proposal did no harm because the Code already allowed l,-w:,;zt ti, _'g," I.:~ U - flexibility. He said that, considering the opposition from citizens, he leaned toward m r r E the position that there was no need for change. IQX4 4 & f -y 4W r h L 7 y Councilor Moore said that he saw this proposal as leaving things too open. He 2 - - - h k - b yv^ SF'.-- k agreed that the criteria was vague and open to subjective judgments. He said that he r yY f upheld the staff recommendation. 1~ ~~z Councilor Scheckla concurred with Councilor Moore. He cited the work of the ` , Y, ra4 a 3 Planning Commission and the lack of a benefit to the City as a whole. ' 1' s, _b a" e Councilor Rohlf commented that he supported the staff report to the extent that the T-~~ § t =t staff focused or protecting the livability of multifamily arras- He spoke to creating °y_~m~ quality multifamily residential areas for those who couldn't afford houses. ' t,g 'i" Council President Hunt said that he had no additional comments to make. He stated * xw a that he did not favor changing the nolicy." e a ; Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to deny the proposal s , . _ r and direct staff to return with final order for adoption by Council. ; m - Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Council 11- , ' 4 President Hunt, Councilors Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") K~' 4 ( r 3k - _ ti Councilor Rohlf referred to the cut-through problem on Watkins and asked that staffs - k, do traffic studies on Watkins or research current studies to determine if action could be taken to retain the livability of the residential neighborhood. Mr. Monahan said m -.=a~ ~ ~ that staff would look into the situation. 9 ~ 01-2 2'~ x ! > Council President Hunt recessed the meeting at 9:50 for a break. 5 3 ~ y ; > Council President Hunt reconvened the meeting at 10:02. , _ y , - ` ? T r, re I VV • * a`$ - iLXU d' y 9. CONSIDER FINAL ORDER R. _ (`QUASI-JUDICIAL) - COMPREERE1LSR.m, R. ra~eu,wr AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-0004/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 96-0003/PLANNED S } _n ~ u, DEVELOPMENT (PD) 96-0002 - SATTLER SITE > MK t; , a. Staff Report S , - _ ffF Mr. Hendryx stated that staff has returned with the final order per Council f ~ t direction at the July 23 meeting to approve the zone change. He f ' recommended that the Council approve the ordinance. ? F i s ( x~" ' e/i COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1995 - PAGE 16* - Y- i 4 F _ .t -y - - - - d y - ' Y ' Y F` I 1 4 4 F 10 . y - c tax - !f Y Y } h Y~- r _ it r. x r r'. 4 - , E Y - j . - - 1~ , - ,I _b~r I I , I : ~ ,r , '-,~M: " , , - _ 1_r~ ~ . 1~~, ;1~. v , -r ( ~i-. y.. - n _W, BANK on W, S~q z-rvA,c's.zF ~ _ ~'""x ...v~...,.... _ _ . u'+"..-3eus..:v~.cs3x:a,..,~~4a f - 3, i i max. ask 's 4 L 4 Y ~ MEMO ~ It _ it 1 AIR is W-1 W'. im s>~.4w~~ "s4 ,rl t i a:ixs. +;R«~ ^""Y•s r~N~~dG. Councilor Scheckla said that he would abstain from voting as he was related to 1 the property owners. b. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 96-32 "s r r ,r - 5, YF. Ilie City Recorder read the number and Bile of Ordinance No. 96-32. i ORDINANCE NO. 96-32, AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Mwl mom AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY MATRIX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY CPA 96-0004/ZON 96-0003/PD 96-0002.~s r Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt n x Ordinance No. 9612. xsi t y s~ xs,. ry k 5 iviuiiort was approved by unanimous roil call vote of Council present. (Council President Hunt, Councilors Moore, and Rohlf voted "yes"; Councilor " e _ Scheckla abstained.) too m 10, CONSIDER FINAL ORDER - (LEGISLATI :'E) - COMPREHENSIVE -1 N AMENDMENT (CPA) 96 0001 SLEDSOE _ a. Staff Report W IN Mr. Hendryx stated that staff has returned with the final order per Council t - b¢ direction at the Jul 23 meeting to den the Comprehensive Plan Text ~ r ~k~ ' ' Amendment to add a new PoliY addressing assi nment of zoning in low z x Y residential areas. He recommended that Council l approve the resolution. a~ , > b. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 9646 The City Recorder read the number and title of Resolution No. 96-46.t`- _ Ill M-M J Y_ RESOLUTION NO. 96-46, A RESOLUTION BY THE TIGARD CITY f , 2 COUNCIL ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO DENY AN ~x 3 APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 96- ° 0001, REQUESTED BY BOB BLEDSOE. 801 5 S fi~ } Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt' s us, ~ t Resolution No. 96-46. k , E IN, 4 T ' 3 ~___+5` 4 Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Council President Hunt, Councilors Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes. 'I 11. CONSIDER RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FUTURE EXPENDITURE OF not, THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY AT 12420 SW a Y ?s~ MAIN STREET, TIGARD, OREGON a. Staff Report; f- z COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 17 r€~~ ta' t„ 7 r s q~ ,y E Bpi 1t - Yp _ !F1 t ow Hopi TAW VMW.= low ey 5 so -1 y_r ft 1UNOW"T p 7&WARN d F h y* 1 ( d £4 ~Ll A' - - tY f' fR 000 1 121 `Vz Tin; 1 ~ r O t- T ~ n "-swoogrop gum - y j 1 ,3( F i MW -a V V 4 _ I" 3 CCC d . 1 i aru%"}' err v a r - - - _ - - - , ~y`a~'4 t ' y ~ -y- ~ h'- 1 R •~4 - Wayne Lowry, Finance Director, presented the staff report. He explained f that the Council moved the $92,000 received from the sale of the old City Hall r ~~a - i } building in December 1994 from the General Fund to the Facilities Fund. He - i said that though it was stipulated through the budget process that those funds - , would be used to partially fund the police expansion, the 1994 Council had n 2 x 7 r wanted a future Council to have the opportunity to make a formal decision t ; F regarding the use of these proceeds. He stated that the resolution was in l accordance with the Budget Committee's direction to use the proceeds for the i 4;"t; rt z ti y police expansion. , L _ i eL i b. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 9646 # x+ ry y 5 Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to adopt f t ; Resolution No. 96-46.X- f Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council Present. (Council it rrr t r 3 President Hunt, Councilors Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.")-x 12. NON AGENDA ITEMS > Local Contract Review Board: Cook Park gray water line bid x - rL Mr. Monahan reviewed the bid for the Cook Park gray water line, Phase 2, a project - x in conjunction with USA to use recycled waste water to irrigate Cook Park. He I } _ 5 s~* « pointed out that the Tualatin Country Club has approved their portion of the project. He explained that due to an error in the calculations b the contractor, Ti ard's r, ~t contribution was reduced from $88,971 to between $70,000 to $75,000. He stated m F although the City of Tualatin has decided not to participate, it would not affect Tigard's contribution amount. He confirmed for Councilor Scheckla that the Tualatin ar K - 1 Golf Club was another participant who would share in the costs. 8 } 3 Councilor Rohlf asked if there were any estimates on the annual savings the City s would net. Mr. Monahan said that, although at budget time they had had an estimate[ , f of $7,000 a year in savings, the revised master plan for Cook Park increased the f a { usage and the estimate was no longer accurate. & s Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to recommend 'H a k t approval of the bid.4 - s 1 Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Council hey i kk 71 President Hunt, Councilors Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") r ~ t k7 51 > A Resolution honoring Randy Volk t e Mr. Monahan mentioned Randy Volk's long time service as an employee of the ' Tigard Water District and the City of Tigard. He said that the resolution was to ~'r q acknowledge his valuable service and his willingness to go the extra mile. a ' ~~3 f x The City Recorder read the number and title of Resolution No. 96-48. i l t - ~ -'e ?S'h' COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 18 ~r v 'T, =0 a fit 1 Tl~ { ~ ~ --a- - fYf~ YYx3J if Y+a'~, J _ Y ~ S Y - F - ,g .iS;C -ff J' 1 E~ -I t d t [ d t1 5 ~ A S'{ h lJ 4 t #y. S-- ~z . . - _ _ - f M ,J_ , `s - 3 4 , ,a- rz 4 M.a -r z n .,,..-cam t - . , r 7 - a+ t _ - s r 2 c 4 ors s'- ✓ i ,t (Y _ _ T3+_ G .bid h ' i _ ct~',•.,<-,„4~- Ste} Va y~ S'-.. I t 5a ~3~ -1, _w_ spa ~ a x ~z. . i cI - s x az _ - - ; RESOLUTION NO. 96-48, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY I fit, HONORING RANDY VOLK FOR HIS YEARS O SER ICAEDTO THE COUNCIL i ; ~ 11'_"'1"_1` ~ " - WATER DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TIGARD. k ~ 3 il" z ~ s ~ Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to adopt Resolution s ' t - No. 96-48. I -M1, 'f, X140 I _r - -11 rs " ' x~ , Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Council , s - President Hunt, Councilors Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") p - n 5 -ak " . € < 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 1 - - f, ` z 2 . t`= ~ r n- ` m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) d)3)& (h) to discuss labor c `r° J=="` ;a'F1-,'` q.p-i-v`,5`-i' A `:t`tP• > . t>,=; -A-1 . a T~` _ b Z"f Y - relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. - d r ~ r ,s „ ~ WI 1 DTs 4 14. ADJOURNMENT: 10:10 P• m. ~ Y s' K x ~u ,•a ' f -r pW~iy . - F V~ Catherine Wheatley n - City Recorder k ; ' -a r, ~ s a_, W , x 'n£ Attest: : t _ .g "'gam - P- t t - rte t - a - _'+'9 s tx s ,J" 'vim s - Z. ~4 'iys •rz +'*tiai.S. Yr .x 2 r yor, City of T aides z 1. I ~,~ae fti si ' Date: ~1/U1Ct'(aF~- . L. e- _ - z tx f:\Rcorder\ccm\ccm0813.96 t ~ ff ~ t ~s 5PEt` { R t i} yam F a,_- COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -AUGUST 13, 1996 - PAGE 19 l~' L;1 ~ ra r - t < k z` 11 % ~_11 , ~ -q` F ; z1, - ~',c - yr ,fi - ! 1wv 1F t"ry, 7~%`~ x r ~sT P y 1 a ny v -#r s z z d " , L _4 M y 1_ x r 7 ' r Fi r x a s v1 3 - r z1{L C;+^.- t Fy_ _ ~r -1 "4^: _ ; - i < rt,'~''~ #s' E` a5,+ ~-'mo'w*y7.•. xtr } - ! t a # q' y , , , J F t ff rr y64 F y ~w ~ - r 1",~`- : ~ - , -X ~t+ ~„bY.w~x Y F ~i2~t '3 3 E - - X _ 1 - ~ - 3 _ y, Y+$ ~ _ ~ h, hN y, ate' -~~4~sr-3~ s4j ~ ; k rt i _ $ - -c'~' ~ ``4~~,i W ~ ~~•~'+'_k•"x ~ _ % 0 hl* . K ~ r=te s ~`~~?ry ~MM .f ry. e 43 d`[.gT~'a,a wl-m r5 b~}s ?t SSrjz s a° $2LCr COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS INC. j= w SAN Legal _AW ti ~ i fiX P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 8595 M E A s a' BEAVERTON. OREGON 97075 -3 s`'x } t x. °q '~r v,. c s 1: C. E I V F i, 4 j r <a's ~;a-xr o-,- R a z Legal Notice Advertising w i' - ~ 'City of Tigard ° E3 Tearsheet Notice 6 kk 7'3125 a~ •a. ~ S`:: uaii 111-vu. t.TT'Y :)F r srz_ .E.vr `x" • ° 71GAkp gr. Tigard,Oregon 97223-8109 O Duplicate Affidavit s g gg!~*~y~ x 's A': f , - jk-F 'Accounts Payable-Terry ° " s- s*s* pia f h s AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ~a sir ` p s t STATE OF OREGON, ) )ss. a u r COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, I, Kathy Snyder a°~ ° ;xc being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Adverlisin zyfc~ - , gg x - Director, or his principal clerk, of theT~ga d- ,a 1 at in 'Dimes _T T 'on a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 ? r ~,a' ` - sw and 193.020; published at Ti yard acoand state; that the in the L !=dg,", Businss Dieetin4~ 4 r r a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the Mr- E r s entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: ~ e -7 v~ dsk~ Ativuct R 199f, R c.*r t k~c - ~t A ~y4~sr at ~ t Subscribed and sworn rtb,,fore me thi f Au ust, l 1-`s t°f -x r4 x - OFF!;.41. SEAL x.,..,; U ROB;". A. €'(irGES$ 24 ,f NOTA;> 't?v Y "AOS c - OREGON Y~^ _yj 1 * r Nota blia for Oregon rO; 024552 t x z a ~ g x My Commission Expires: IL'.; E.,; ;;cS MFi16,199' as s "K QM AFFIDAVIT NN r h igk*,,;'`q a xt - ' .t -rimer 4.a2 s+pbf _iJ`3 7 _ m°xw x ,Ear T r - Y f `Yt>£F~,~x - -;,b rc AIT Yom{ %"tr fz"«r {'fi i _ - f _ L - ft s r x u.~^ - a. L -Y' Ml~ - - ~ "p _ ' 5 - , i a r rem ~ _h ,yy-' 'it§ syµ M?- ~r ' Y . - - , Y s - - - a 7 i _ - _ ® 6 { 1 Y - - r,. +s ~t € " ~._k.._~~ ..e+n.. a.n mu+.exuau.u.:near._._.__ . - ~ i } , k z --p _ } 5 ¢ k ti - 4 - i 4 ~'W F { - i - -11 The following meeting highlights are published for your inftxmz6on Full 3 agendas "may be obtained from the City Recorder. 13125 S.W. Hall ' z Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 6394171. - ] - u ' - I r, aff COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING r' August 13 1996 e vuar tisnicv C:; -__HALL' 1 13125 S.W. HALL BOULEVARD, TIGAItD. OREGON Study Meeting (Red Rock Creek Room) (6:30 P.M,) _ € ` ° ~ Executive session: Tiic -8-a ' C ' e~' : Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d) - { * " r (e) & (h) to discuss labor relations, rest property transactions. f currant , and l ing litigation issues - a • even Proposal Changes to City Charte - . Agenda Review ' r ` Business Meeting (Town Hall) (7:36 P.M.) Publklieael~igs t y I - Le 'isla4lve Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 96.0002 . - _ b g ' 1 AKA Business services. Request is to amend the texts spolicy i 12.2.1(2)(1s) of the Comprehensive Plan to modify the spacing i L § and locations! criteria for General Commercial land uses. < , . ' Vacation of StrectRight of Way: Location: S.W.,135th Avenue v.. f4 s Council Consideration } ~ Ordinance Amendmgg,Tigard municipal Code Chapter 7.32 Offenses Against Publtc Order ~Y( - ' . .Ordinance Amending Tigard Municipal Coda Chapter 5.10-, Detectives and Merchant Police rj , Ordinance, Adopting Two Ordinances to Assign Planning ~ fi~ & r Designations to Pro es that hayed bean Annex' ; , 4 A 'N - Ordinance on the Final Order Approving a Comprehensvie Plan . ~ - rj x Amendment (CPA) 96'-0004/Zone change (ZON) € 9¢.0003/Planned Development (PD) 96 0002' SanlerSue - ' ~ . ' Resolution on the Final-Order Denying a Comprehansiva,Plan ` ,r 1 Amendment (CPA).96 0001 Bledsoe r V ~ p ;M g.' a 1"595 - Publish August 8.1996.: y - - - - - . - " fY£ L K 2 ft "i ~ ~ I t w~"' ~ ti'- ,'wn- g'M":Y' ~ , ~ - , ~ I . A f S" r i 5 . > t I , , i, t' F R C \ / t a I ~ - - , 4 1 1 - , ~ f i N V A-. k }t - - n L t f,, cYc 1 { _ _ ? ..1 [ x $j_,_Y . L._ ',7- F ` _"-t- "y `'a'te r - - - - - y - a - a " i"4 tat' - s=3 - $ - x'- 1 1.y-, < 1 r _ 'wY~ 5 f's F~ '-rA r 1 c _ g - y`E't- ,z ~'1X ' f - - -v3ta"s`z..~ rn j - t' 7 - t -s j y- 3r c -ta''k ;'~tryt - - z .sa xx a r3 ~;L'_ .ty'..u ka ~ s- _ F:z J'r .~afz, 1,,fi' ^fi - s _ * r r ' r r } 4 f- - I -1 11 I p. 5, u .,.,rti4 s.u.. a3x •~3 4 ~r ,A _44- _ , 2,t~zr 7~,. apt I'll h F q -rs^ , e ' F.," z ~r~i `r k ss^ y 4 was`„ s--~.~.. ~,2 k,g'.k.~ia- - G Y }L COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS INC. sW` i~4~~ i- P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 N tCe TT 85$7y~ ~d fits f ~.rx` - BEAVERTON. OREGON 97075 Legal lm~ t nonce Advertising t City of Tigard • E3 Tearsheet Notice r k ' 31325 SW Hall Blvd. l' !j 5 199E y7_ 3w -ti 'ligard,Oregon 97223-8109 • 13 Duplicate Affidavit A = j -_)1-Y OF yr uCtK N - ; _ f_ 'Accounts Payable-Terry • TIGARf. rte, ~a~~ { ~ ` AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION j'` c ~I , wl _ R - Y STATE OF OREGON, I 3',u r n" t COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' M _ y, ks -14 4~Y" x5 I, K a t hv Rn~sAPr.~a.r bang first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertisin y ar' E Director, or his principal cleric, of theT_laard-Tuala ; n mq mes - a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 x 3 ' and 193.020; published at Tigard ' I aforesaid county and state' that the e b the $ f r CPA 96-0002 AKA $usinss Service 4 ,r a J 4 k { a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the r ~ -4-# entire issue of said newspaper for__ QNP_ successive T and E consecutive in the following issues: . g I ) - ,k 1 ,4~ August 1,1996 k x c. 1.. 7,y ,r _ ~n.r§-~ airy „ a - - t ,^n- ! rX-~' r s Subscribed and sworn efo me this r p s , xi " * OFr!CIALu"EAL q 1p, em 6 c , - sa Not Public for Oregon/ NOTA.^ °,U' ; -OREGON xT ev¢ s~ k - a 0 . 024552, 5& _ gyp _ alvt:.. i icS MAY i6, t99' - L , s , t My AFFIDAVIT Commission Expires: t"r r ' = ~ ~ E SF G s r -~z.r j34 ~ 1 -'*~et~d*5--N C:--, :i Yj a !fir 9 a3 r r- {g 4 [t - t - -^^-"'~'~-x-~+, - ° ~3+z :eL ii.. t- :vg y. r `a. , } c'd~ r a ,a q rs 'Y -.E . , - fi - r-I ~ - , 12-11 "L ~ "L , ~,i,, ~ , . I t < e ~ . . - ; , L } - -M!=M:= EN € `t I ✓ • - Try 'Y2~" fill (K P.1'4 1 k.I , -X E..a lug` `sue #'n- s - 'a- - - - - - - 9 t Lt $ ;1 3 f 1 - - - _ 9 Rt 6- - ~„.r».r.-........_............. ................u....+ '..aw............»..-~,++........... ....-.._°a.. j-5- i+''i'3 [ .i d~YYyy t.-..5 -Ylt C _ yn xa.'..~ (a, rtd mlt '.r 1, , - , ,4-1 4 F 'Y "w ~X- t ? q'. i , L. s - _3 - ro y 3 xr Ji y ~J `--`i d e ~ x p ' `9v f1l9 L " 4 e - ^'r The following will be considered by the Tigard City Council on August e x " 13. 1996: at 7:30 P.M., at the Tigard Civic Center-Town Hall, 13125 r, ! ,Arv.~,~ t ^ F ~ , S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written tes- z I timonyy is invited. The public hearing on this mattermill be conducted in . ~i accordance with the rules of Chaq.18.32 of the Tigard MugieiniCode, - 4 ti 7 : and rules and procedures of the City Council. Failure to raise an issue in r person or by letter at some point prior to the claw of the hearing on the re k ` x{ , , y_ T . quest or failure to provide statements or evidence sufficient to afford the P R t § r y=ti decislonmaker an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to the close of i v - r°z"> e I the hearmg'on the request, precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of ; ~ Appeals based an that issue. Further information may be obtained from a r - , sq - the Plaiming Division at 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard Oregon 97223, or r'i by calling (503) 639 4171. s " 5 - s. t 3 _ f-t G p --N thrj zl G COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 96.0002 : , AKA BUSINESS SERVICES - - . F~ r~ 17.<, Amend the text of policy 12.2:1(2)(1a) of the Comprehensive Plan to ~ x a it modify the spacing and bcational cnteri a"for General Commarciai land : ti ;`,4% $ j ttses LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A. APPLICABLE REVIEW, . CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11 and I2' Tigard ' , xr Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.1(a), 1.1:1(c), 2.1.1, 5.4 6 1.1,` $:1.1 and , " r ' z~ I -1 < 1. , 4 12 2 2; Tigard Community Development Code chapkrl8 30 and Oregon • . Administrative Rule Chapter 660, Division 12. - {kx r 4 g 4 - : - ra''.' f i 778587 = Publish August 1,1996. - 7m No . j . 'r rl- S S 1. Fi 11-111.11 , 9 r - E F, 4 1 t x t t t~ { r r ' - 1s rr S , I _ * r ts t E - _ j . , , : ~ , - , , ~ - 7 - , ,r ~ , : - . I ~ " , ~ ~ r I . " , I I I - , L,'~~. : " ~ , - 1, jl~L_11. ,~,',11~ . - - - - a i t s ; - - s{ F, Js, ; 1 r~ - I _ - . . . t _ T-`11 , - . ~ ~ ~ - - , : ~ , , " ~ ~ - ~ ~ - , ~ . , I , " ~ Z 1 , " ~ - , 'r- , ~V- _ ~ s { _ 'I F } . a x p' f t b. ..s TM L~ C 3 _„t,,...,,__ r,_.. - _ _..r _ - F i-r . - s - c 4 . _,LL Z7 . _k" - , ~ - - - 171811_i4 i - ~ __e_ __-1j-_`, ; ;~t""1i"'__.-1_1T_-i ,r ' 'ES".`Y r"k~, c k ; _ y 'af ~f `~ac'"-t, ® _ giSi iz * - aF - r .Y -b - a - 7 S - t 01=11 ~ - X a a fi'° Z., 'r £ _y ( .y 3 - x -1 r jz, +-z';;.~=+ r r nay ,,,r,l.. ~taa+w~ = - „rsvsmu- - .s `._.._._.<6._,...,....._ r~ N' _ 4 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS INC. Nax>t , r y - Legaly T!1' R 57 5 L._.._ 1 -.mac, 4-r2"-' "r'F~.sy P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0.'350 F r s ew c Jiks ! BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 "I i I [.'v I t" 'q # 20 Q' ~ v' Legal Notice Advertising ;1,= „ ~ - 3* :iT~~ S ' • • El Tearsheet Notice I , s 3 FS ~ I 11 - r- ax 13125oSWTHalldBlvd. ° ITV OF ilGAki. ~ k ~ i- ' ` tkk`! °Ti ard,Ore on 97223-8109 13 Duplicate Affidavit ~ M = °Accounts Payable:Terry3 r ..fqb . _ am S~ a 1 F`j f i _ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ! 4 , h _S1 . ~r g s r " 4 STATE OF OREGON, ) ~ ~ py 46COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )as. , nwll. -fig - 11 h { ( Kathy Sn der a~~ ; R~ 11 "I being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising t - r * b 3- Director, or his principal clerk, of theT~ garA-mea l at in Times I # -5 NY 1 € a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 111 -1_11 " and 193.020; published at TIgard in the r i aforesaid county aqd fate; that the, - t g 1 Notice or R1git of Wad Vaca.Hearing-SW 135th r i - 5 ~jsc= cam s ra~1-.c~.' s % _ - a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the A'€ w}-r .~n"' r s~~ -t+~ rF entire Issue of said newspaper for TWO successive and - ry'"`'*.~. R_ I a consecutive in the following issues: f:t~ z~ r; July 25 ,August 1,1996 w zc- . ; 'mo`t U ~ ~ ' zx t Subscribed and sworn afore me this 1st day of August, OFF!GIAL SEAL ) x v , i _ - 2a- s-- . s C,/.. rti: ^ ROBIb A. BURGESS ' 7 - a ~ -I t" I } ,rA NOTAR - `Ll -OREGON t Y F t rra.'"x,..~.:~ „ ,1x Yy; Notaf Public for Oregon ' GOlAM - NO, 024552 , I -a - - NY x _ ~iy C" ~SIOt; csF',i7c5 MAY15. ty'37 a." -f y F - ~ My Commission Expires: - s - r AFFIDAVIT _ - - x , NOTICE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OP.WAY q y k k STREET VACATION HEARING . . , r i r„ r a VACATION OF APPROXIMATI3Y 6.445 SQUARBFEET- '-"4"'-" tI f - - OF PUBLIC RIGHT. L OF WAY LOCATED ON S.W. 135TH AVENUE # ' Y - tit' Tho Tigand Cityy Council will hold a public heaTin of Tdesday august * d ` -Eq 73,199b, at T:30 PM., at the Tigard City Hall, Town Hall Room. 13125 - . x r- 40 x ` ° S.W, Hall Boule , yard; Tigard; Oregan, to consider the proposed vabon _ s - - - of approximately b,445 square feet of ppublic rightof-way an S.W. 135th' _ ' Y j's - 1-1 _r' f a f An ninterested uest was initiated by the City . •uacil on June 211:1996 . - t i i Y person may appear. and be, heard for or against the ' r " , 3 ~ r 4 , r, proposed vacation of said public right of way vacation Any written ob . r ' ' & a , ~ )ecbons or remonstrances shall be filed with the City Recorder by :August s 3 " V - it 3 13:1496, by 7:30 P.M = 4 ~ , , , s r ~ a a ' ` r TT8575 _ Publish July 25, August 1, 1996, Y - x „ , - ) i, ~ 'arm ~,x .t. ' " t _ r - f! F, x 4 se ~ P 'r f k [f t -*k s ' Y y , i " x a!w ..sa~-,> -a- -R.;xe. r„:: r F°' , °'Bc'-a° ':i?,? Y {Y- ; i ; ="1 ':°v:.i s a ' E ~ .1 s yryy7 z4°` _ I 1K, ffl!?'~"'~~"~ k Az~ ~ i f I jjr z z it y, s z - z i , 111- ;Y t €,1. ~a7-. _ -,rtes_ € rn; s °-t~ '!t- ft t F"'~ Cf s s x ~ d F I spy. xt`+xx' t w r£ 1 - r t ir r V ' t~u,°t?' T-",' s''.s _ - 3 y - a SSE -S ~ € a 8 1 r rs I ~tg # J l _gfF 4 -tv- I t 3 cY6 x S a..:] J Ay'. -r r v ~Sr - ~ Ott -_'----'a . t_. 1.i _ 1-_: 1. I _l:_ _..i_~."_ -3 3 - a . # hL$ z . -tea, Y'' - ' -S - - ' ys --'V - } , T `Y'r sue` - - # _ F x - z - a e a ~ i 1 t "sr °y - -n 1 - c S- - h ter- -?a - - t _ , l z7'~'`~.y a~, - -.r•sL ;:u. 'a _~-'ice'"`` - , r .~`-y'~,~ke -xtwr ..w. - -tvtd,1z'€.' - g. -4 --Il~,~,,~",-~,-,~-,~-,~~li~i,~','~~5,~Nl~~.:"~e,~~,~ 1k, -i, j.~a. ...c..a:c.. _ h. ^Y:,r-r '°,A Va : -tt.i.--;',, r,- Wig? m < z CPi Y OF TIGARD, OREGON k 3w y e (7% AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING "s tr - t" : - - _ R 1 in the Matter of the Proposed ,z.U ; ° Ss `s , ` ~t 5 O ` STATE OF OREGON ) , j County of Washington ) ss. y ~ c ) i City of Tigard s " - t r s ~~,-4~,.,';---~,~e-,,:-~,-!,~,4,~-',"-',~,~",-7,,,~,,~ - k_;;!!~~l - 1;z begin first duly sworn, on oaths depose d` That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance * 3 ~N 2N M,~ 4 P 1rI., j , - Number(s) - -3 - .~LGM,--k r which were ado ted at the Council Meetin dated 2) I copy(s) Via, h ~ 4t of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the _ > ak day of A U,- Ic.~C , 19q b t i~ ~ . N 11 - 11 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon - - 3 Y ~ IN 2. Tigard Library, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon" r' 3. Tigard Water Department, 8777 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon M F w' -.,!~j~,~'-,', " - IAZ 14 rr * A t > . - ~ x~ ~ w Subscribed and sworn to before me this a a'Q day of , v 19~. fi xc r~ .,x -pis y s - n ` 4,,,.&,_, ! _-1 `!k' S arz. - _ rr ry - t` V'A 1XL , - - t S c-,V J p < OFFICIAL SEAL Notary blic for Oreg n , - M JO ANN HAYESr L k 0 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON f s s. z 7 ` COMMISSION No. oez,<e My Commission Expires: ma"- 5. 14? 9 9 a - 0 r a z 3, , MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 05.1999 - _ 'v - 2 s - - ky >ti '1 t -O - f s i }.adm\jolaffpost.dae 5 A 3e 5.,'-x ~,f.p j a _ 1 C.x. 3l - § 4 8~ 1 11 ~ ~l }a' f t i2 N_ Z~, j ,fix. ` e c. 7 r $ r , c43' ~ 11, , ~(-y _ yt5 tlw ✓".tv^`sm"^®"""" ^P?.e. '2 k "F iF2`i k t - 77~"' , E r 11 -W5a - _ - ~ z - 4 ;,,~,W,05~~f U , , ~ ~ ~ . , , , , _j Wig, t t s ' - t - _ _ ~t-;-- ',x# v f - t ~ ~ . I - - - , - . , 11 , - - 1'~ _i - , - , - - 1:1_21_ - I - I - ~ , " - - - - , - ~ ~ -1 i_ _•w.._-.+..c+G-- . _ r_ _ ..;tom_ _ - .i L__ _ , , - 1 - ~ - L~ _.11_ - - - ~ - _ - _,Ij_ " - _ - . _L; - "~L__~~l ;z~' s , -._.c~ u~- ti.._ . s a_. 7- 5. 24 w W, R 4N' A.Ilkt . } - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON L y ~a fi ORDINANCE NO. 96- kg~ xt asp AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7.32 OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER a r €t} 1 N v M" in ~ a WHEREAS, The City Council finds that Chapter 7.32 of the Tigard ?~k~r 3 n Municipal Code should be updated; now, therefore: b THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: - a- - i SECTION 1. Chapter 7.32. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER is amended" 2. $ as indicated in the attached EXHIBIT "A". Deleted a - wording is sErite and added wording is g mmzr' ~=R tea" e ;s underlined. Pi~ SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its tifv6 4 passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and _ posting by the City Recorder. _ mss- ell i S J ' PASSED: By _ l YVl ISU vote of all Council members present k a after being read by number and tit' e only, this !;i~_'k day of [e'~ey9 1996. 71 x. Cat Brine Wheatley, C ty Recor r-~~ # APPR04ED: By Tigard City Council this day of~ e e" Mn r 1996. zy + - 'MW 6A "N. MR, K s vi. NUAT cb-n.i( PrtSSo6-r Ta S- ~ ~U l Approved as to form: E t - ;fps A rum # - ' City ttorney t-a y Via, ! erns ~ 7-•. x ; r - ~ ~ h~l { ~ ozP,~ - k~Xy.a'd~ { Date f 1 - - •S f ar,~ iil" ~F' E I 0" V 77777 7 ,rC - i 77 - - i.,., - 1 G t xr Mill LIN "`~~-r. ~..._~c.i~ _ _ _ t r ~_~~~.~-.r~r~a^^---T- ~ t.m~.-'.::'`~ 1 Z~i-3-'-- s ii. ~F , ~-a Y nijK 1` h - - z Y ~il_. I "arr -7~ j~e qr- -t -j _ 11 8A I - i-liff Y.GC~ I Tf S i fi~I 4~ 5 d rie E7QiIBIT "A" x ~ - " `s-t~ i Chapter 7.32. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER r ~ ~ g ~ ' 7.32.010 Disorderly conduct. ' ° 7.32,040 Abuse of venerated objects. " ' ~1 7.32.050 Offensive littering. g otR' `e 7.32.060 Creating a hazard. rt°,ar <t k t . -yz 7,32.070 Improper garbage transportation. }t' x r 7.32.080 Blasting without permit b - ' i4~~', r 7.32.110 Public indecency. x= -...`5 7 32 120 Disch°rge of ::capons. , rt,- 7.32.125 Carrying loaded firearms. ~ Ie-, F 7.32.130 Carrying concealed weapons. 4 y;1;:-:=. e.F _aled _apens- .~',.,_lr ar~.~. #~t c~ 4_ , _ 7.32.150 Use of air~guns and beanshooters. s gX - ~tY c 7.32.160 Manufacturing, selling, carrying or possessing sluggingc X100 -#k or stabbing weapons. ,x 4: ry -l" I - r 7.32.170 Persons permitted to carry blackjacks. t Yt, - c -`o ras. a _ 7.32.010 Disorderly conduct. F~~1 y~ n a (a) A person commits the crime of "disorderly conduct" if, with intent to cause ublic inconvenience anno ance or alarm or4gn_' - € recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: ~ ~ . W z„ - 55 s ~ry i (1) Engages in fighting or in violent, tumultuous or . threatening behavior; or ~ R, W. V J (2) Makes unreasonable noise; or ~ - r n - - r i (3) Disturbs any lawful assembly of persons without F- lawful authority; or # y m3 sY - r (4) Obstructs vehicular or pedestrian traffic on a ~ OR ~ e.blic wa or p Y - -I (5) Congregates with other persons in a public place and ~ adf-M~ j refuses to comply with a lawful order of the police to disperse; or { (6) Initiates or circulates a report, knowing it to be a,t r'y . false, concerning an alleged or impending fire, explosion, crime, 11 - catastrophe or other emergency; or' . a t Y S j;, ,{y,S YSl~ y (7) Creates a hazardous or physically offensive k3~ condition by any act which he is not licensed or privileged to do. , s aZ ~s _ " r : (b) Disorderly conduct is a Class B misdemeanor. (Ord. 84-65 r a, 'r §2 (Exhibit A (part)), 1984). ~ :3 t' t r ti ert b A h~ 7.32.040 Abuse of venerated objects.' r Y _ns s # (a) A person commits the crime of abuse of venerated , x objects" if he intentionally abuses a public monument or structure, i z kt s s f .,I a place of worship or burial, or the national or state flag. 7-~ r' 4 - - 3ate- 4 .S~ 1 1 ? ' q5 4.y y f - 1 9 J - r!-C l T`rzb. - iF rr ..ur.d_. Yr`S5£3uL1.._3r =dM:__.....1 'ui "a m'~?r^43FVa 4 .,1 -1 ' y ,,A t t s} r,~ -~r t 1111 ao a~x-ate .rs- ;9" ..ere5n a-vr.~:r., r~ar+f~..as .a .;v ~s 'A - 4 d # i. L fF' } '£;"x,. a ; ] - - t~-'~'~pab' - - - s,'--~t~t ' a -NAB` a - ~ E ~ -7t lr-. ~ . 'i, . :z4 " , - - , , 1, . ~ , , , I , ~.,--,~'L", ~,~-.i,~ ~-:L~~_~ , JIT ~ I 'V~ - -f, - . ~ , , i" , . , ~ML,~ - 1.1 - _ -;io,~,o~ - I ~ y X5 3 i - r - ; _ _ s ,r+ vc"` , +'~y 4 S1 0' a ! - „x- sr zrtp,Y wz{,,1 n- s _ j - ` i`- - Ml~_;__` - 1 2~ , , I 1.~ ~ ~ " h 1 _ -4 i r - Ri ~ - , -L I p 1i I a:, 11 - -__~~~il` - - '12L~", ~ : ~,s~~,'`Yrt--~. --.G~~s. <._c.~~~c... 1.-, H-._ .i t` 1~ i.~f ..v_- i_.~-.-_,---, - ~ - , - I -t'y. c_.iu._ Ug Y u - s 4(" yr__ (b) As used in this section, "abuse" means to deface, damage, i F defile or otherwise physically mistreat in a manner likely to ~f T4_ outrage public sensibilities.- _ rf e , $ r (c) Abuse of venerated objects is a Class C misdemeanor. Yx (Ord. 84-65 §2(Exhibit A(part)), 1984). € iJa~x 7.32.050 Offensive littering, - _ - - A€'i (a) A person commits the crime of "offensive littering" if he xz f y creates obectionable stench or degrades beaut o r -41 appearancenof property or detracts from the naturaltcleanliness or'es'' safety of property by intentionally: 4 =°5aa Y -y (1) Discarding or depositing any rubbish, trash, garbage, debris or other refuse upon the land of another without permission N of the owner, or upon any public way or in or upon any public+ - transportation facility; or r° .`w v (2) Draining or causing or permitting to be drained, sewage xz~,rTti4 or the drainage from a cesspool, septic tank, recreational or camping vehicle waste-holding tank or other contaminated source, ' T ' w upon the land of another without permission of the owner, or upon any public way; or OR E } r (3) Permitting any rubbish, trash, garbage, debris or other refuse to be thrown from a vehicle which he is operating; except «x r that this subsection shall not apply to a person operating a M~r t vehicle transporting passengers for hire subject to regulation by the Interstate Commerce Commission or the Public Utility vz~ :`E - d Commissioner.$ (b) As used in this section, "public way" includes, but is`~. g" K not limited to, roads, streets, alleys, lanes, trails, beaches, L parks and all recreational facilities operated by the state, a_ ~f county or local municipality for use by the general public.x , r ;t # (c) As used in this section, "public transportation facility' has the meaning provided for in ORS 164.365. (d) Offensive littering is a Class C misdemeanor. (Ord. 84-65 Y §2(Exhibit A(part)), 1984). `?rs a 7.32.060 Creating a hazard. Inz 21 (a) A person commits the crime of "creating a hazard" if: g r v rr 4 l - -z v t (1) He intentionally maintains or leaves in a place' accessible to children a container with a compartment of more than ti one and one-half cubic feet capacity and a door or lid which locks r or fastens automatically when closed and which cannot easily be *FUgx; A _ 7 opened from the inside; or z i (2) Being the owner or otherwise having possession of w - - L ,et ~ rag ~{,3 *rK „y ti -k n ^^r-gym., ~~'z*" ✓°L 5 „ _ '.°..^°,«t' si - s'~+'' r s 5~.. ~ =?fin;^,u-.~,~,~ ~ ,z. 3 ~ ~ I Y`yz,+ s -Y z Lr Y v E.y,sx r -41 'r Jt, tA`+n ?2 ' - ,,l a 4- - - - _ - `4'-C - & t- _ - - t K Jsv x.3r "Fx. ern 5 t t - _ a y - Wd $ 1 4 Z` t - y t i 5 f }`a _ r - - s"; rte., -Y -`-property upon which there is a well, cistern, cesspool, excavation `fir P or other hole of a depth of four feet or more and a top width of 4 T ~a,k twelve inches or more, he intentionally fails or refuses to cover y4a3- @,: sg-., '~3, or fence it with a suitable protective construction. s, s= < , ,v~, w n~ %n ' (b) Creating a hazard is a Class B misdemeanor. (Ord. 84-65 t r{~ §2(Exhibit A(part)), 1984).-;-' , ,t€r a 7.32.070 Improper garbage transportation. r~ x is (a) It is unlawful for any person to carry any garbage, tr- filth, or refuse along any sidewalk or transport any garbage, a,, swill, or refuse through any street, except in a covered wagon or _ in a tightly covered box or apparatus, such wagon, box or apparatus ) ~Ffi*n to be-constructed and so covered, and such covering to be so closed k z 'trwt m or fastened down over the entire contents of the load as to prevent ;,p S,y Y such contents from leaking, spilling, dropping or in any manner s_ ~ being deposited in the street, or from being exposed to the open ,I ~ W V' ~k air, during such transportation. (b) Improper garbage transportation is a violation. (Ord. 72- v~ 4r N 21 Art. 8 §12, 1972). - r^ , 1 _ I A tD ' 7.32.080 Blasting without permit. - , o- ` , (a) No person shall, without having first received a permit - YY from the city engineer, explode or cause to be exploded any p` 3'~t sPc t f c.`` t~r rr 4n'i't explosive for any purpose. "Explosive" means a chemical compound, mixture or device that is commonly used or intended for the purpose ry+{~ 71 . o r L$ ~ r_ r r of producing a chemical reaction resulting in a substantially F instantaneous release of gas and heat, including, but not limited ''r,=~~+~-~ . t - 3 to, dynamite, blasting powder, nitroglycerin, blasting caps and , f ! nitro-jelly, but excluding fireworks, as defined by Oregon Revised <c Statutes 480.110 (1) 1984 Oregon Laws; black powder, smokeless 1 powder, small arms ammunition and small arms ammunition primers.c -`r x~ , - h, - (b) The city engineer, before issuing a permit for the use of ,F I .-I explosives, shall require the person to whom the permit is to be;~ ` iW v issued to: t r+ ~ a I --ill, h . 4 Ju~"ks~y (1) Complete an application form and state the dates, #x,+,,^> 11 . , time and specific place where the explosives will be used, the j f I "I purpose for which the explosive will be used, the type of explosive ; `y Z, ;.i . which will be used, the maximum number of units to be used, and the ,-_2 . _N 1 name and address of the person who will be using the explosives; , r (2) Provide a letter or other evidence from the ` > ~ d- x F x ryes insurance carrier of the person to whom the permit will be issued +J f r ~ ¢ that: i t (3) The applicant is to pay a fee as prescribed by the F v: ' city council and by Chapter 3.32 of this code. ~ ~ . { r 3 ` (A) The policy shall remain in continuous effect E `i , s x Z t -)--M} l 3.,y Sag-may-,,` s t - f- - t 4 , E i ~:t rc..~w-rwn*s,rs - s r°'.'?:b 5i t - I s ';a'1,a''a - - -?s - f'4 f r' T t, F "x 9 t 1 L t- TIM s - y , - y , , _r - , - , , : - , " 131. Nr . I M 55, Z 0 q _ s - - t - - - - r,tL J4":, ly 4i 7 } i °7 J f ..j 8 _ t y - F` l F M _ ~ . , , ~ - - , , , ~ , : " , ~ , . ~Rm 0, , - _ f er 'RC 5',t1, w - t - _ - 5. e 7 - rte` ' Wt _ "e M l~ fi2 P t S 4 y a .r - - r - .t ^W;sfyiis- x z - s n - # . w a t r-- a - - - 101. " ;iO for the time period for which the permit is issued. The letter or k r ~ 7,n other evidence shall identify the time period for which the a:> t'~uZ: " } ; t~ ; r3 ~n ` insurance shall remain in effect and d _ (B) The person to whom the -1 x ``a f permit will be issued x has insurance coverage to the amount required under subsection (c) r of this section. < N - .r- ; w z~ - ;J (c) No permit for the use of explosives shall be issued by A x~r S Sat r'' ] the city engineer until the person to whom the permit will be m z,P,.r: ~d i,. , : - provides o., issued ante of insurance for such amounts as the city .'u'' 1. I. 1 engineer deems necessary to protect the city and any person. c_f _ property in the city from all damage or less that might result from~j j. the use of explosives and to protect the city, its officers, agents s .>fi - y, Y and employees from all claims for such damage or loss. In no case • ;a,.6sse K;ay~r; S shall the required insurance coverage be less than the following: y I,c~ , c (1) Fifty thousand dollars to any claimant for any n umber of claims for damage to or destruction of property," - to including consequential damages, arising out of a single accident " or occurrence;~_$fi'~ z - (2) One hundred thousand dollars to any claimant for ali - ~A~-,- , 11 I x~ other claims arising out of a single accident or occurrence; and F }iX (3) Three hundred thousand dollars for any number of ~_4" - - 1-1 3 S_ `z Q claims arising out of a single accident or occurrence. f f~A.~x~~ . c ; eta ~ssh 5 6 ~ n Lk s` 1 (d} The city engineer shall have the power and authority to k- <F Tz" J e limit the time, dates and force of the explosions to be made.' t r, # ~ y (e) The city engineer shall have the authority to deny an ~M,A-~"z s application fora permit upon a finding that: _r'~rs~ s (1) The requirements of t horse Cade provisions have not C <w I 'I been satisfied; _ L y (2) There is a danger to the public safety, surrounding s ~ properties, or individual persons; or~r ` (3) The applicant does not have a certificate of 'x~ , _r - [ 1:~'_', possession required under state law. ( _~#r (f) The permit shall not be transferable to any other person, ~ W ~ o r to any other location or to any other time or date. Zt shall be ~ r --5~'., ~ a - "specific to the person, to the location and to the other r, F i information required by these code provisions. The use of k x - , 4 } r tr _ explosives in a manner other than provided on the permit shall be i F'rf-E~ s~ deemed to constitute an offense of using explosives without a 1 , ; { Permit. , ! ) f y (g) The offense of using explosives without a permit shall be r" - ' x -~l r a c 4, _ ~ a Class A misdemeanor. (Ord. 84-56 §1, 1984; Ord. 84-41, 1984: Ord. g4'` k 72-21 Art• 8 §13/ 1972) • a r ~ 8 { v ~ n .r1 y r ~ bra f 11-1,111 _ ' t r ! , . opt ~e - b '~EF$ ~YZ°l-k ;r m a'xw 'd 1"'" - - T` ~ Y -7 " 11 L~ w - -'S - - i - - x z s 4 k 5. Lt Y h - 3 -i - 4 L 1 r _ F F IE - , E - - ~ , ~ ~ - - I-- v t ri, i{r x, d a+ tI { i k - s PP - tM ,_,__',~I,.,, ~t ~ , : , ,-]I: " . -3 _ - Y - L~, } 4 1 - - = 'n""'+°^ r _ . , ~ _ •.~.ai..v. - l_ ~u. - 1.t _...i _ - . . i Q t, a x ~ °s a t r .g,yf't Lwf* n 7- y 3~ tx---Y~ s_-- 5 k iyt`Y.Tf i L~ Y " # 111-11,11-11. G` r'ta t xz,t ,4:...,~''" ..~.,..ea...+~,.':... - - '.,.d.....,,v.__........._.:......_...._ - Y y T m,,~'~,i,r 32 R _0 R r L 9 ,i n -M " -i 1 ~x 7.32.110 Public indecencv. w a s, (a) A person commits the crime of "public indecency in theF 44f~ _ first degree" if while in, or in view of, a public place he-g Performs: - "jam ~ r ys~ i (1) An act of sexual intercourse; or 11 x` (2) An act of deviate sexual intercourse;`+~v$ j _ _',,,asTt t Wit..- (3) An act of exposing his genitals with the intent of~ n arousing the sexual desire of himself or another person. , % ~ 5#A~5 fi s ` (b) A person commits 'the ciiai0 of "public indecency i, theta air -4 -1 second degree" if he urinates or defecate s in a public place or a w place visible from a public place (other than a public restroom). E i (a (c) Public indecency in the first degree is a Class A „gyp tt~ F misdemeanor. . E i ~i , 11 ` } i, I'll (Ord.(81-126b§1C 1981c Ord. 81-36e§ieco981a Orde 72 21 Artla51§4 _ tF ° 1972). ` , ~ 7.32.120 Discharge of weaaons. s- k: Y y ~iI'll E .Ei ...ik;1`r i8'' M S ray (a) No person other than an authorized peace officer shall. a fire or discharge within the city any gun or weapon which acts by x r , force of gunpowder or other explosive, or by the use o£ jet or ~I rocket propulsion except as may otherwise be expressly provided in , 11~ this code. n zy } 3~~ r (b) The provisions of this section shall not be construed to Tai II ' ; prohibit the firing or discharging of any weapon: y t V_~ ? (1) By any person in tha defense or protection of his z~~ °V n property, person or family; ~ 2ME 1. #M. I ~'4 ~~1, '`H r (2) At any place duly designated or commonly used for target ~y ' ' Ike- t , x , practice; „ { ~ , t t e 11111-- . (3) At any gunsmithing business, for which a business ~ x, ra E license by the city has been issued, and for which a construction ' design for a soundproof test shooting booth and bullet trap has Fr` gh- been approved by the chief of police. Prior to the issuance of the ~ 4, k i business license, the shooting booth and bullet trap shall be - 1 f'g-' - inspected by the chief of police and the building official or their g -5 r - 4 - Y designee for compliance with the construction plans. ,x_ ,f 11 a d it " - . 1 ' (c) violation of this section is a Class A misdemeanor. (Ord. °E xa s sr i 85-17 §Z, 1985; Ord. 83-60 §I, 1984; Ord. 73-14 §1 (Part), 1973) , r J III 7 _ s _ k ' C t° 5, - K . - , '#x. i^,7•..a - anrsap n. s c - x 7~'I +z-a~~ S ` ]-WT, z f '4 _ r _ ; a . ors t''~rsa ^i a , s 'F..F 9~ t 3 z -.Z' ~ "I , , , . . , . M* .1 , , , , . , ~ 31 I III.,,,.W-,,- p2~~ oi~. s r- x t v I. I " cat a~ r x v _ _ '''-k r- r.r m y ti I //k tir m--n-.r} - _ x./- __~'~+y i..u-... l - i--';' ~i_.. - L, - ..s. . .G -f.. a. _W ---L-1 _._Y..i ...`G-L..:.__ _ -.Y ~4 _.z.__ _3~~e , r # fr - X0 { S - i i _ 4 u` Y,s q ry fem.= ` - - -r -r ac-- ' ^ ht t4, 'p _ _ - - - 'N^ - 5 ' tt i,._. 6t R a4 , v._ - - N SY} 4 C h 5 X ! t {yt t 3- f F y A ` k F K 7.32,125 Carrying loaded Firearms. - ti -'N i r As used in this section, "firearm" means a pistol, revolver, - . 4un, rifle or other mechanism, including a miniature weapon which (r -a: ~ i projects a missile or shot by force of gunpowder or any other xs z IM explosive, or by spring or by compressed air. t A s t 3 { i sP _ a i f 44 t ` s azdcr nra--°3Ftz 1`63-v£ r 4 . r ti € - e P K y~ L F ( tii h- vl - Sat It is unlawful for any person to possess a firearm in a = ` -i R k ublic lace as that term is defined in ORS 161.015 unless all , ssl " ~f - - -1 ammunition has been removed from the chamber and from the cylinder, i._, "I clip or magazine This section does not apply to or affect. E r s I 11 (1) a law enforcement officer in the performance of r ' , n, - -1 official duty;~s e;:'~ .:gin§hwcip~:41'` (2) a member of the military in the performance of { fR + b,gq~ official duty; E[F _r ti-,V (3) a person licensed to carry a concealed handgun;-5x`'~ `1 rh yam, (4) a person authorized to possess a loaded firearm W while in or on a public, building under ORS 166.370. 1, ~}s ¢ u < £ T ? (b) It is unlawful for any person ' IN t ) , eeeapatrt, possessing a firearmn in a public place to refuse to c ~ ` ` permit a peace officer to inspect that firearm after the peace , F, s` v-S officer has identified himself as such, y s_, -s I - ? ' T- y4 T b - n S - 1!~, -I . . . . ~ ,~i rv v - f - -K1 34l 5a3'i r 9 FF ca, 7 3a~ a . ( ` F1 e ~ 1, d-saeh--'eermit l l l F 1. _ed. `k „1115 - S- T 4 ~I A {e} ~1 Violation of any portion of subsections (a) and (b) t ''j, E t _ - 1 U 1 r i a +s Yt, JIj t I t - f kLL r -Y - _ =z i -r - k t ji 1 F 4 r r"uZ Y = - _.,~,,,~.".3 ,,P,~.T,' ~ L " , , ~ , , . li ~ _ _ I ',~,-:_L;~,t, J p 'y - - f S F ? - _ i'_ , k J N f~ L Y } F h Ell r, _ G _ , ~ - O - I .t 5 f3 TA, r4 3 L A f 7) f Y ~ £r ~ S _ f x I S I 4` e x and (4) is a class A misdemeanor. (Ord. 76-22 §1, 1976). 7.32.130 Carrying concealed weapons. # (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, any person who carries concealed about his person in any manner ate. ~evelver-, plate! _i any knife having a blade that € projects or swings into position by force of a soring or by " L centrifugal force and commonly known as a switchblade knife etke a M J , or any dirk, dagger, ice pick, x slingshot, metal knuckles or any similar instrument by the use of which injury could be inflicted upon the person or property of any other person, fftp commits a Class B misdemeanor. f r (b) Nothing in subsection (a) of this section applies to any s e 4€€; ee:c`_-'` ' ether- peace officer as defined in ORS 3 x^MRI? 133.005, whose duty it is to serve process or make arrests. x justices of the peace have concurrent Jurisdiction to try any person charged with violating any of the provisions of subsection (a) of this section. (Ord. 73-14 §1(part), 1973). € y I E x x Seigure 7 32 146 and Eles - -'_a weaEgf-2. veh#ele e€ the ear~le~ e€ arxy-maeh}ne gc~n-g3stel, sevolire~-vr ` r~ i ; T s e3 -4 ? 3 4 rX~ r unlawfully -earrying the same aye nffisanees, and Shall be serfendefed to the ehle€ a€-pellee. The pell eh:ief-to-whem-tray weapons are srfE~reftdered, emeept epen the eerb}€#eate of a-etsee4t t that the4:r p~eservatlen is-r3eeessary er-prepPr to the-~-of jtisbiee, yr "shall annually between july ist and 40th, destrey the 1 i M that they X i3 inefEeetive and :732.428 useless Ear- the pur-pese ~er tihieh they weve _a.__a ~ t r 3-- in the any sai. h :harm has been a en and i s thereafter- a.vve ea Ere f" the thief e£ his trans€e -ee' it shall feet-vc :.3 yr 4.~'.s„u 6esi~~eyed but shall be r--- as seefk as ~r tt cfse as evidenee has been sewed, epe n h.i 'de n` -t`en of the L .fjust£ee will be subserved thereby; seeh weapeft shall: be r$, tint4_1 l the neeessitp-€er its use eeases-(6F-=3-4_ f 3 par- t 9:73) . t - 7.32.150 Use of air guns and beanshooters. •~i 4. x f 1 z" t~p 'S f (a) it is unlawful for any person to use, cause to be used or - s encourage the use of any air gun, beanshooter, slingshot, bow and t 5 Fk, X F i i t 1W, s i C_. .i. Y. ~-.._~_..i a:,'~:._.~ .vim. .z. fr J---...._.zc»__.. _C _r ._~...cvL.~ .-.a_s.. -1~-z.f. ~.~.`.l•.._-v. x too so lot To u~ hits- _ °,x»Y'. ,•Sf ff api ryF~.r''r,.t:`ss;,i;., 3:F;~4y,.•'''+~a -...4 xh = €e r e r~~~ F - t~ arrow, crossbow, or other similar contrivance, in or upon any ~3; street, park, lane or alley, or other public place. ~t - `i, I 7 k 4 Y. y,.~7y A-th . t~ s ig~'i t~la ti (b) Violation of this section shall be an unclassified y „g ,a}yqa y J misdemeanor and upon conviction a fine may be imposed not exceeding fifty dollars. (Ord. 73-14 §1 (part), 1973). f s k? ' 7.32.160 Manufacturing, selling. carrying or possessing slugging $ , a 4}-~ or stabbing weapons. e s R Except as provided in ORS 166.515 or 1 66.520 an 1~ `~c s= s ~ } . Y Person who `cam s manufactures causes to be manufactured, sells, keeps for sale, M11-001 ' M t r` *MA 6M _14~_ k offers, gives, loans carries or a possesses an instrument or weapon Y K~ r 4 W a r having a blade which projects or swings into position by force of t° £;z a~ t h a, a spring or other device and commonly known as a switchblade knife z or an instrument or weapon commonly known as a blackjack, ~-r±, tz• ~ ~ + s - slingshot, billy, sandclub, sandbag, sap glove, or metal knuckles, 3r = or who carries a dirk, dagger or stiletto, commits a Class A~ ""';aw"`~'z £ ? .,.i°da.^sa.^.cr- (Ord, 80-14 61(oart). 1980). 1 z 7.32.170 Persons permitted to carry blackjacks. rt' ~ o (1) Peace officers are not prohibited from carrying or of - - possessing an instrument commonly known as a blackjack or billy. fi > T (2) As used in subsection (1) of this section, the terms _ s Q "blackjack" and "billy" do not include an instrument or weapon Z, 7, r commonly known as a sap glove. (Ord. 80-14 §1 (part), 1980).~v r i U Lot s __t'z Lot ."t~~a MN -A, 1 45=, I f f _-4 BEW NOW R'A S k fi,"y r~, sy f T .'.s- err h €S~s t, "E~+{ FPM; #r s-C.Y'`-,fir?>'` 3y4F . slalom- gEggg, Pr 'xx S3~SP k' 1l Y 1 - 5°.ls'J x~I'. , Y'd Snook z Q~Q?Q_efy JIM 10A Y i 'W" rir - z - - _2 s i own y c"- xsn,.. z k - - - - - - 'My slogs T---` to; off, 73k 1 n `o'r t -r l I >Fl w ; $ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ' _ 4 x2 ` ORDINANCE NO. 96- yfl 1 <s at£~ E4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5.10 DETECTIVES AND MERCHANT POLICE 45 _3 F a r AUTLA-t WHEREAS. The City Council finds that Chapter 5.1G of the Tigard_ L2 g Municipal Code should be updated; now, therefore: mm wymuW, u - THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: k43E3~; j 'r lbi, a p ySe~ a a SECTION 1. Chapter 5.10 Detectives and Merchant Police is amended } s 5 as indicated in the attached EXHIBIT "A". Deleted , 1 wording is and added wording is M t x F SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its g ti t } passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and ~Fc 5* 1-1 posting by the City Recorder.a x to in z PASSED: By l~nun IV?10u5 vote of all Council member, present s~k r gMINN e ' ' r F fter bq{ i.~ng read by number and title only, this _!3'tiday of .1~/~.~o~n." 1996. 2 Nr r i "Awn " Y therine Wheatley, Cit Recordak a x x w -WffM i APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this 1 day of M 1996.: C' pas n ry " . / ra V Approved as to form: ~ ~ ~ ;~s'~~^"n~ 3 _Vr we 0 Ego - f ji a x ` " w kF, ~ti £ a 3 E QUO Cit Attorney NOT, J-3 iii >n S Date yaw gg, r}rte r -5 3" 4 - x-p kx''s' M A AS UWE, krk E w' s} f _ 'rr' _ y Rr kyr a you, ~ s ~ I TAT EASY vo 0" now ~ E~l e s 6C sue..-ta'.t, s :.:r - - - . h* +'s"f - _ - - r r ,s! - t y°`' ---ri r 7 - j 3} r z t ~P 1fir Chapter 5.10. DETECTIVES AND MERCHANT POLICE , ,cam- 5.10.010 Definitions. ~=7 t}, ? 5.10.020 License. y 5.10.030 Qualifications of applicant and employees and termination I ~ ~ W.0 - c ~s i of employees. a rS, 's -g < s 5.10.090 Investigation of applicants. I~ , N --tsa 5.10.050 Issuance of license, w r _ 5.70.060 Bond. s - M~ x 5.10.070 Revocation o£ license. K ,.-,,i,; d~ b 5.10.080 Notice of termination by licensee. - z~ n r , q 5.10.090 Uniform. ,3g p < ~ r 5.10.100 Cooperation with police department. x v~,,, Y-' + _M 5.10.710 Compliance. € W u aS, A n, 5.10.010 Definitions, p4- , (a) Private detective means a detective engaged by an t 11 a~ individual, firm Or COrporation for private _NiatecclOn Or fOr the " purpose of ascertainin facts of a civil or 4 criminal nature for the ~~5 benefit of a private person, firm or corporation and for which a f{1-, fee or other compensation is paid.: (b) Merchant police means any person, firm or corporation (a-~u_ ' engaged in the business of watching, guarding or protecting any ,mss x , premises, property or persons; provided, however, that the term 5 " `,v F does not include any individual who is regularly employed by one ,~~~v"'" - ~ ; E. 11, .x^ employer to watch guard or protect only the premises, property or sz - person of that employer. (Ord. 73-32 §1(part), 1973). 4 5.10.020 License. x, - 4 $ It is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to engage ~ ~ - '1 in or operate a private detective business or engage in or operate ~ ens a merchant police business for the ur ose of 4'~ p p providing private 3~ 11 - - 3 detective services or merchant policeman services except as -1.1 1 k r~1- ~ provided and authorized by this chapter without first having ram k ` obtained a license from the city; provided that no license shall be I T, 7511 required for casual, occasional or isolated instance of civil or x _ _ W1~ y r criminal investigative nature by a private detective whose ° - = employer, or who personally, is licensed as a private detective by' any other state, county or municipality in Oregon or elsewhere.: y" 'f} W f xp ,if s r ' (Ord. 73-32 1§(part), 1973). Q A W F E y- 5.10.030 Oualifications of applicant and employees and termination ~ - of emplovees. h0"3~ my - - .0 With each application for such license, the following shall be w- ',6aa furnished in support thereof with respect to the business applicant, i h , - - : as well as for each employee who will operate under or pursuant to Y N - authority of the license: ,b,, F (1) A statement in affidavit form signed and sworn to before te' 1 # , 1 x r y 1 d # r~- 'Y 7' r a+ f r . _ I Z X r v - - *+:mag v.^:.~t' 'c,:<'7v~#l.:;.rw t'^ E _.,o-7l t r, .~.x,<......,---...., rrFx f L _ 4. .~l . ft - d- ` . t < - Y r_T -4 x4 b~ z1 ~ht t ' - s 11 r s Ms ls- L 7 -s; .~t ,C- - r - y r X d rr1 s •t t - ,t s57 ,k, f". its Y M f 1 - - - F Y., fi fi 1 - Y * k i b 1 _ ! e . . - - - - r r vt { 'fi`n' ..::,rte._F~"^~^°-~r~ L , - r r - -n^~ I. - - ~.i...~~,1. _11.x.. . - _ .v-~_ _ r....... r - e._ .~.1 _ u..-... _ .Y... ~i ....e _ ..i~~-. ...'t ,P, , . rr ~ t - T s M ME-7-P 5- " ',~~4',:~,-,~%;~ "".:,2~L---- - ~ " " 1~- I . - ~ ~ ~ - I 1, - ~ - : - - 1 , - a ' ~ -1. a - _ '"-s+, ,gam.-j'am' [ - r _ , q,,. 2 r - 1 r: _ v,s `'F 7 R j i { -k. _ _ - ${`z,4 LxN - k -:L 7 r , t .{3 r A c - 7 ..S S } C R L i^ i fl _ _ 4 - d Oyu, } ` a notary public stating: - 7 ~ - k -11 f (A) The full name, age and residential address of I' k~.~s-a, applicant and each employee,M, H- } (B) Present occupation and past occupations for the `z 7 ,h I +s _ immediate last five years of the applicant and each employee, _ a j 3 0. f, i, $ j } ..27 - ` t- (C) Statement of prior police work or experience in the private detective or merchant police field for the applicant and . n --jY each employee, ~k -4 s { -I _ (D) Statement of all arrests and convictions of a r,,~, criminal nature, and major traffic offenses, for applicant and each €k Y: r -i n. employee, c~ < i 6 _ (E) Names, addresses and occupations of two or more r# 'r ` reputable citizens who upon inquiry will verif the a licant =^d each employee to be honest, of good moral character and competent U yj to act under authority of the license being sought, (F) Any other information or facts which may assist in }fita$~ evaluating the suitability of the applicant and employees to operate under authority of the license within the City of Tigard; y, h x s rte, (2) Applicant shall currently furnish to the Chief of Police a I ,4, j a like affidavit as in this section required with respect to each :`h ' `y new employee added to licensee's force during continuance of the i license; , -'-sar x - c t~ ' ,Wa r_ _ i "4 is 'o s I may. 3n _ - (3) Licensee shall promptly in writing notify the chief of ; L ~c r police of the termination of employment of any personnel member :r i .0 ~ previously engaged as a private detective or merchant policeman by y r_ the licensee under authority of the license. (Ord, 73-32 §1 (part), c 1973). .45 , A -2; F -~-v~4',',--,~T,*-- j-~~.q -1 [ 5.10.040 Investigation of aoDlicants. ?I y- The Chief of Police shall cause an investigation to be made of ; the applicant as to moral character, reputation, integrity and y o general qualifications and shall use to have a written report of - } such investigation supplied for the city files. Based on the ~5-- , , _ { r results of such investigation, the Chief of Police may authorize mot, E the issuance of or denial of the issuance of the license as by this ri` cha ter set forth. (Ord. 73-32 1 P § (Part), 1973). at a 5.10.050 Issuance of license. 3€ , r ' ~ - _ The City Recorder may issue the license only upon written ' ~ " _ approval of the Chief of Police for the fees as set forth in t Chapter 5.04 of this Code. (Ord. 73-32 §I (part), 1973). ' I' 5.10.060 Bond. `r} s . t r 7 f s q 5- >r - rt,M e 1 ~x 'ors a s i v IM { ei ar 5 w' 2$ f , u-, t : ! 7v~c -VSYS ~a'~='G: ui e.°?:§°^rPr - - _ F ,'i 7 { t F F . k Y j r 5 f- ft _ L y 1 ":i . '.1 ~:.si 7_.... i. .r4V..si♦..-.s._ _ v~ f ."-1--1-z r.__.~.rr. •~..-.t~_. ' ,3x ~a - - - > - b Y 3 4. - - W l- { 3~ ~ 1 r1 t" - The licensee shall, at the time of issuance of the license, ' f file with the City Recorder a surety bond, in form approved by the V' city attorney, in the sum of one thousand dollars, conditioned upon x ` the faithful performance and honest conduct of all persons who will r be engaged in watching, guarding or protective undertakings of the n i person, firm or corporation licensed hereunder. The bond shall be for the benefit of the City of Tigard and all affected persons, businesses or corporations, and shall assure payment of any judgment secured against the licensee for his negligence, default E-*-~ or lack of fidelity, or that of his employees, in the performance -~~cre of duties authorized by the license, limited to the sum of one s tea''* - r ~t f :-1 thousand dollars. (Ord. 73-32 (part), 1973) Y ' 5.10.070 Revocation of license,' yr u4j~n:s} If, at an time, A p any the conduct of the licensee, or employees, is ;r in violation of law or adverse to public interest, or show lack of a kk ' moral fitness, upon the written recommendation of the Chief of W`W Police setting forth the facts and reasons therefor, the City z Council may revoke the license granted under this chapter. e It shall be the duty of the Chief of Police to investigate the activities of any licensee or employee hereunder and to report all'-ems information to the Council to enable a determination of whether or not the license shall be continued in force and effect. (Ord. 73-32tx ' - t f 1 §1(Part), 1973). s< b Fr: ` 5.10.080 Notice of termination by licensee. €1~ r- %ZM Termination of the employment of an employee engaged in the 1 private detective business or in the merchant police business shall e L be reported by the licensee in writing to the Chief of Police. t~ {Ord. 73-32 §1 (part), 1973). 1 5. 1 0.090 Uniform.+ The licensees under this Chapter shall not wear a uniform which represents them to be, nor shall they in person represent , themselves to be, a member of the Police Depar'tmen't of the City. Patches, insignia, badges or uniforms shall indicate the licensees ' M`{r 7 l n hereunder to be "licensed merchant police," "detective" or ~f J A i~ watchman, as the case may be. (Ord. 73-32 §1(part), 1973).- rr 5.10.100 Cooperation with police department. z a rx - x -c d t k l Licensees under this Chapter shall fully cooperate with the CFTigard Police Department and shall fully disclose promptly to the Chief of Police all information of a criminal nature and turn over ` to the police department immediately any evidence coming to their knowledge or possession concerning any case with which the Police pE 4 Department is concerned. (Ord. 73-32 §1(part), 1973). - U - 5.10.110 Compliance_ L^` ~ x" i ( t 9 Y 1 C 4 M - ~rcm'~' r #t t 4, t - t- s d ..,,,E 1 1 ~ C 1 4,4 ~ f Y rs X t s 311 4 Y I' F ~1 ~ Y 1 m # .J-s'a{1d fi 'f /'•Hr - 4 F - C - k~ r F 4 y.S t - f - .et_ r- - y f - a ',z• ~t Y .V x 'jW TOM r t4 yjz J T P"'= - - ~el MM, z Any merchant policeman or private detective now operating or -x v doing business within the city limits shall have thirty days from date of passage hereof in which to comply with this chapter. ; s- The provisions of Chapter 5.04 of this code, including fees 4 s~ y and penalties, shall apply to this Chapter to the extent not t a , inconsistent herewith, and upon conviction for violation hereof the t a penalties prescribed by Section 5.04.194 5.04.190 shall apply. - (Ord. 73-32 §1(part), 1973). a- MM- !7x31 ry " 44 '`ic-m' 3 ~W E a W PP 0, 0 j 0 4w" N" - V Ka t 1 M A.N 77 ~'Kfi ^v^~ j"s4 d +-w1' - }--v ?p ~,f- F _d 9y. a'x mss-- tom,"'rF,={ i'.#± 7-7 zgz'syr'` •.4,3 .C^i.,~ Ly s .i R R; R'M YR-Off ry-,. r,~ .uf.✓ .z. r, r-^'+ s ..7 r - - - t v sr, f(r`5¢',~ f n4 vF - r` i _ - r r~ -:f VII, I-V t rk-s}"~' ~r^~-_-i~r- rl~a. r' * L•z - - - @ D1P G~^. g~ w~'9 fi t t T-t 4- 5 •r°sT-'Fw p E ~..s4-~x F _ gyX~ _la_ } by 3 t : 1F111111:::111 . - rs+y - - _ de - - . - ~ I - !0~-M'M'~~ u,,'--~~2'f L,! '-~-,T~--."'-'-'~'-';-- - ' - I " ~ I", ~153~ - -1, r I `1- `.:a ; -'ate,.'' tea r - t ' - i - _ jzas~ Nr.' - t 1 ~ yf k' t fi '0'4- ~ 41 _ u... _ . t r ~ ! $ ' yes { w ,z 5}_ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON I 1 ft _ ORDINANCE NO. 96-3 'gg F N S'.~v'i 3 _ '.s.._.SJ ` 1 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONS FOR PREVIOUSLY t ~'xaH!' ='r 4 ,'r ANNEXED PROPERTIES. - - WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public meeting on IF/) 3 , 1996, to assign Comprehensive S r 4 Y Plan designations for six previously annexed parcels of land located throughout the City; and E x7~r s J t ~ . . u WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan designations recommended by the planning staff as set forth in the i ~ "~,aR v attached staff report and in Section 1 below are that which most closely approximate the Washington ' I ~ 7 r County land use designations. * 2 4 4 V , ~ t THE CITY OF TirpRn ORDAINS ;g FOLL^vvS. ` i SECTION 1: Upon annexation, the affa~ed prpenies shah be designated on the r 3`~" a _ Comprehensive Plan map as follows: r ` 17- 777 1 Tax Map. Lot Number Current Designation New Designation I'll q 1 , - N. 2S1 4BD, lots 200, 500, Wash. Co. R-6 Medium Density Residential x~i* 5 ' 1- I'll 500, 1900 and 2000 ON, 'A4 "V - 11 Current Designation New Designation F - i ~ {."''°x ash' v,.w r n _ r, aY ) 1S1 35AD, lot 500 Wash. Co. R-9 Medium Density Residential . ` r " s a SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, i ~ ` , k % a, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. ° ' . PASSED: By i. nCtl1lf yl vote of all Council members present fter being read by number and title t ~ v C~^1t -.a t ' onI this /3 _ day o 996. f L~ Catherine Wheatley, rtti, o wide' I 4 APPROVED: a.,r,..,... ni•... L day of~-yF r Z _\/Fr1 ya, .,.y wunciiibis u' 0{1996. a r~ I {.1 ,u - 4 'v - r ' - , vim' a- r Approved a .to forrp: t ~2t.~ ws~ ?c~u t N e CCU-'L61 PLes Fd L, 'k c`~ s Citf Attome ` ' ~ E _ i " f ~ Date r - _ ~ j,° k "f' - - L Y y ~ L t' Y S ei ! F S- ~Y~tliy. t- ' l Ky _ 3 S Sf cWplnVaYVUxutles9.a0, _PM ~ `1 Ya mss _ - , I ° ! - S Y _ " ~d ` ORDINANCE No. 96 ~ 4 { i. Pagel W. a ; k di r l r i tt yy - r- r- r arrx s,..a-.,..-•M^...°• - awe ; - x# ,f r r ry aye s { .fie' _ r+ s . L2 , , "JI, "'N"', - J 5) F T. S-8 i- t - A J yr L t _ -k- 1 4' f _ - #r r kr , IdY,,, °T OS 1- - - - - - - - , , - ~ " - r - " , " . - . . I - - , ~ , - J, , - 'E _ - k u j ~K, - r _ - . . _ w _ 'v. R r -3- - - - - - - - _ L -k-t - l• r >k r y`i! L ~YL F't h. f i.i 9 : _ _ TS _ - - `'7 f i i_i.f'1.3bC...mM isa'r..u ®b.-' { .S _ - t 3~' ~FgJ,a,xrt - ~n r x - - c -...Lz 6 b'-,r r., a - ~''i a r r - - 4 'Sf 6'2 ; .e,.a......_~r-...~...~...........__... v ~.az ,e40 r£ ~'g-,sf 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T - d " 3., `jx x sue' ' a r a ORDINANCE NO. 96-3-1 ~2 ~ ~ €~a `x t 1. 3 Y 4x' >r~ X t A h} . r Fn- , TAN ORDINANCE ADOPTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS FOR PREVIOUSLY ANNEXED PROPERTIES.b xc4 . a j'- We I 3 WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public meeting on g', 1996, to assign zoning ; - " - ; 1 designations for fifteen previously annexed parcels of land located throughout the City; and i h a. i s~N WHEREAS, the zoning designations recommended by the planning staff as set forth in the attached staff ' hn-° '57"X j - Mays -'-i' `i'•2'aLa .={n y report and in Section 1 below are that which most closely approximate the Washington County land use 4 kJ designations. >sw ~ ~ THE CITY OF TIGARn ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: .n " n - - - c -yak ~ -11 , ` x -L--',.1 SECTION 1: Upon a vexation, the aYecied properties shall be designated on the zoning map z~~ ~ ~ as follows: e ~ ~ Tax Map. Lot Number Current Zoning New Zoning x}r ? j 2S1 3AC, lot 2100 Wash. Co. R-5 Tigard R-4.5 p ; ~V_4 r 2S1 3AD, lot 802 t I ~ r. f 2S1 10BA, lots 100, 1500, " " i 1800 and 1900 - Current Zoning New Zonings ~t ~aa x x r s zta' 2S1 46D, lots 200, 500, Wash. Co. R-6 Tigard R-7 k IN 800, 1900, 2000, 3200 [E'✓ r~4~ . z G _ ' and 3400 +Ye f 2S 7 9AA, lot 1100 r>'z ~ Current Zoning New Zoning A ~ - } £ -s 1S1 35AD, lot 500 Wash. Co. R-9 Tigard R-12 . { SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, s ~ t signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. ~ .4 4 , a PASSED: By-unah i mt~yote of all Council members present effter ng read by number and title , E rt on this _ day o , 1996. s ~ ~ " I sa g - F 1.C 't-Q ~i~~ 4 t m - ..u~ , 5s - ~ ~ ' s atherine Wheatley, City Recorder ' ~ - c " r t I - ~I APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this L day-o ' 6. V- - , € ~x' - ~ . ~ ~ 1" ~ ' - tc 1' _ r - .."M, x aUr .,nom... Paul Hunt. Council President ,z IT 1FF y r p ORDINANCE No. 96 ~ qr a r ` Page 1 x 3- -A a+rt Y -A` ~'rtwr .+z'~n# Y'x +''"m" -11 4."x fr L - - z 3 dy - C ! - r g f r i . - - IN . ' ~ .-'g" - I - I 11 I - -1 " - I- -1 - I J11- I -r- , Z ,.t' t- s - - a ,£s z- i t ' f x~rt }J - i. _-r -1 '3'P7"S5 F- -F Sf ;N 5 - 4 J d A J- 5 M , , . - ; ~ , , - ~ , , . - ~ 4 i t - ?x ~ r4 . - t t ri ? - ~-crn I _ }-3 - - - l _ - _ Nwr 7 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ , 1 ~ . M - z - - , W. ®0t ~A aew r "ss,t M 'f rt - - r`'a'>4w - icy .a - _ s - - 'F - '1' s t p€k~~ a -k iut ~'R"s*'k`- `r< a' S ` iY 35 ,x F Y - tf t`[ y 3m~ ,ter - _ sf-' t rk, € J V ' ,N CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON I A . ~--9x ~X - ~Ll~ ORDINANCE N0.96- 3a g' ; r, *5 c k $ u rt r AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A TIGARD - ~ ' ,U- t { COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY MATRIX F = 3 3 LAG DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (CPA 96-000420N 96-0 003/PD 96-0002) Le - A a F i WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a comprehensive plan map amendment and zone ~ r change from Low Density Residential/R4.5 to Medium-High Density Residential/R-7(PD) on 18.5 _ i ~ , r y~r _ ~ acres and a zone change and planned development overlay from R-12 to R-7(PD) on 9 acres of p x- _ , - _ Y avuunnlcoa Hall Boulevard and Sattler Street and J~, , : liy at the ^vl^cr of ~ t t ~ a _ piapc xk V - Y M ^ 3x e 1 , the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the proposed amendment, x~ WHEREAS w l` -s and zone change at its meeting of June 17, 1996, and recommends approval of CPA 96- . - A 000420N 96 0003lPD 96-0002. ~3 4` f Y Wlvl~ " i& r THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: E e:`rj r ' ~t z SECTION 1: The proposed amendment is consistent with all relevant criteria based uponh - the facts, findings and conclusions noted in the attached final order (Exhibit 11 1 - i . 6E A). ~ " SECTION 2: The City Council concurs with the Planning Commission and staff 1 F__,1:'_~_,,,'.._ - . .M~ ~ recommendations and approves the request to designate the parcels illustrated on the attached map (Exhibit B). a t a . r, s ~v~I i SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, - signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. L , -1111 k % TO M, 11 1 @ r PASSED: By 1 j11QYli>Y)OIIS vote of all Council me bers~ present after being read by „P number and title only, this 1. day aft 1996. xjr ~ ~ i , 0ottr1li!(Jf 5GGi~ck[a Jc~d nod- 1/ot ,f . It g2t~_~ -"._zl'_y~ i Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder - rah L~ I r ,k p t -'tr T G -qa `~v 7" C 1 i APPROVED: By Tig ard City Council this 13 day of 1996. r 3 _ 5, - ,4 J +i- Yxi" Y 7 r$. Z lQUQ Wu-t, CJLlriCtl P.Vtd.9, K F -j _ - w yj a s t ry " % of -i i 'iy _ I y t, z -r Y ~I r .fit ,''r' £ ~ a 4 - >%,~r 2- ORDINANCE No. 96- ' ` ; ` , Page 1 r x , S-- - ..-.+wt+e4 r Y Q 4 s xe- - i - t few., - n ,r-T 'F z 1- fT r'xj a -q - p, - ! r t ' ry t , . , " J_ ~ ~ . - , F a - - - - t - , r ~ , ~ : _ . , ' i i Diu. Yi'.,- E } _ _ f rP y t t- s 7 -1 I - ~ , , ~ - - , , " ~ J, 1 1 J S t V I Y ~rW r I ,r ~h k - - '157 f"77 , t~ F [ , ~ - - , , . - , - T , - , - , - - I ~ ~ - 1, ~ ~ I I ~ ~ , " - --%.,r~ " ~ , ~ ~ , ~ . , ~ . # f { - k - t { - L 3 S t - - - - - 'Y- - - - JT I -rt S t.aa.,- .~'~-+-....-.-..--_____.w .r.-.-un-.u.1,.usma.+.ce...r..--...v,-..,_....~.a«w......wr...~i>=..zu.m f E ,N-- - _ b h Y { rt _ . y A ~Y- r " A - ; LOCATION: West of Hall Boulevard and south of Sattler Street (WCTM rt 2S1 11 DA, Tax Lots 100, 200 and 300) i..' f~~ r7-ai 2• VICInItV ~~`,.~r q1,, "L~ The three affected parcels are located west of Hall Boulevard and south of Sattler r ~ , { °i ` Street (Attachment B). The properties to the north across Sattler Street are, designated as Low Density Residential with a zoning of R 4.5(PD); to the east Z dj (across Hall Boulevard), south and west are properties designated as Medium Density Residential and zoned R-7. All of these areas are developed as t% i ~ subdivisions. One parcel immediately adjacent to the site along Hall Boulevard to ~ Nl z - t r rt ,residence. r' - - { the south is zoned R-1 2 and GOitaii5 a single-family ,r -N , ' ti } 6 3. Background Information , -I ~ - ~ - 5 - 0 - Site History. The entire site, consisting of 27.52 acres, was annexed to the City in is".,~` t9 l , x , March of 1982 and designated as Urban Low Density with zoning of R-5 (eastern 9 s , acres of site including tax lot 300 and two-thirds of lot 100) and R-7 (western 18.52 ' f ' acres of site including tax lot 200 and one-third of lot 100). At the time, R-5 s ~~iT denoted 5,000 square foot minimum lot size and is equivalent to the City's current c~ ; - H~~tH R-7 (7 units per acre/5,000 square foot minimum); R-7 denoted 7,000 square foot i; F r F q minimum lot size and is equivalent to the City's current R-4.5 (4.5 units per < ` x s t { 4 acre/7,500 square foot minimum). The current zoning map, therefore, should tf R { show the eastern portion of the property as R-7 and the western portion as R-4,5. ~ - I4 r 4 However, the eastern portion is shown as R-12 (12 units per acre/3,050 square , .t~ ",rtr foot minimum lot size). See below under Section IV, Policy 1.12 for explanation of 4 t this discrepancy. There have been no other actions staff could find related to this < ~ ,,t- Z s property, including a zone change from R-7 (formerly R-5) to R-12.t 11 .1, 3 n X 1' . { 4. Site Information and Proposal Description - , r- di >t - - - The "L" shaped site is comprised of three tax lots. Parcel 100, abutting both Hall , and Sattler, is 12.65 acres with a single-family residence and farm buildings; the ~ ty s~+ remainder is open grassland. Parcel 200, the western portion of the site, is 14.57 t", „ «n, r nd us as ure land. A single-family residence is located in Est,-- ' ac es a ed past the ~ , s,, ; . t northwest section of the parcel. Parcel 300, located along Hall Boulevard, is 0.30 4'. j x u& } ~ 1 acres and contains a single-family residence. There are two identified wetlands on the site totaling 0.78 acres. They have been described by the City's Local ~ ? x to , Wetlands Inventory as farm ponds with no adjacent tree vegetation, the shrubs a ' totally grazed by cattle and emergent vegetation as not recognizable. They have . ~ - , received the lowest functional value of any wetlands in the City. Further, in a letter 1 i _J t - 2 -e _ ~ a i .I s r-r --,-'.y-r' G..S fi ,y ti, x - - - - r e o i N , s e s - - t f .A r c, _ 3 -k - r si < I ruf - r_ i - - i- v E+r ..j _ i fah - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1~il -e - P T - - - - - NN", ~q 5 Mk mir~ k a -"i - Uf _ -~k - -E _ { - Ys _ - - C „r - i fr' - S . k ~`-p`-4)~"r a-('aM1-:y(~: - _ F:~:- _,-Xr o f~.: _ 4~` from the Division of State Lands to the applicant's wetlands consultant, dated May f ~,.1 16, 1996, the Division's Wetlands Program Leader refers to these water bodies as a . k t~~# x stock ponds and states that there is no wetland area surrounding the ponds. r a , r ' ' The applicant requests a comprehensive plan map amendment, zone change and u planned development overlay from Low Density ResidentiaVR 4.5 to Medium h , t} { Density residentiaUR-7(PD) on the western 18.52 acres; and a zone change and x~ , planned development overlay from R-12 to R-7(PD) on the eastern 9 acres. A s FP`f written narrative has been submitted by the applicant in support of the request. If r the is appra , ,.,eli , . IL - _ - - ,proposal i :s ved, the applicant has eiipressed o Wsira w do.op a nec- ~ - ZI!M7 a ~T _ r t T traditional subdivision on the site. There are no plans or submittals, however, ..x - , - µ ' _ u ,'{V T_ - - pertaining to a subdivision development as part of this application. -,-,?,~..r ~e~ - a J 5', T n= Ai R 5. AgenQyComments L c~ . - ;qp t > ODOT has reviewed this application and informed staff that the proposed change "',g~h M is not significant under OAR 660-12 (Transportation Planning Rule) and, therefore, -S,i - did not submit comments. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ( _ ' `YV~ I 1, is a a, I t o . , ~ e -ro; ;I 1 4 + The relevant criteria in this case are Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.2(2), 2.1.1, 6.1.1, . - ~ ,J 8.1.1, 12.2.1 (2); Community Development Code chapters 18.22 and 18.32 and 18.80; ~ ,I w x - ; 11 1'--~"'~ and Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 660 Division 12. , ~F-: ~ -1 ` ° 3 - COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: - 11 iin" s General Policies; Policy 1.1.2 requires that in order to approve quasi-judicial i~ ~ E- changes to the comprehensive plan map, the City Council must find: 1. The change is consistent with applicable plan policies; r , k ~ 2. A change of physical circumstances has occurred since the original , 4, ~ designation, or; ~ s `6 x 3. A mistake was made in the original land use designation. ,e ~ ~5 I n~w ' f 14k r x The proposed comprehensive plan map change from Low Density to Medium Density ~ i r' ~ ` ' + Residential is consistent with all applicable plan policies (see below). i Yom'<.`f The applicant makes cases both for a change of physical circumstances and a mistake _ ~ , k e to meet this criterion. The change argument is based on two circumstances (see " " Ix k applicant submittal, pages 17-20). Staff does not consider the first circumstance to Y* T-i -I'.- constitute a physical change. The applicant states that an R-12 area southeast of the T y 'S F' a~ 'S r5 s'' t 3 L r 3 , ~ r A a ` r wk ) y A,T ,L t - ~ t -4 6 x t sk a ~m+.,ncar- : e, F --:r" ,~°^,'iv. "~°jY n. t r "f x r 3 ~ti ry z F - - a i ~ x_, + ' - - I r a f 4 x'S _ 4 IY ~`i x I~ w In , , ,1, ,-~,P'l , ;,,'F::~~,.~~,'~~r~ ~r.-:'-~ , , , , I - ~ ~ - ~ - r~~ . : ~ t - K ..x.,.. ~t;..~,.-~... _____11_,~_1 , I : ~ - - . - , I n . ri-Ei'll'.- . _t , , , ~ - 1 , - , - - r - - - _ - --4P - _ - - . - - - - - _ 1. a.,c - - - `c ,1 - _z,_... . Y V, 1 u J t - w Y` y ' site has developed as single-family homes with smaller lots to a density of ✓ approximately seven units an acre only. This may be the case, however, it is not a - ~ ` physical change which is cause for a zone change to the affected site. The 4 development at seven units an acre is allowed under R-12 zoning. The second _ argument, based on a staff recommendation to the Planning Commission and City r a..: Council in 1987 to 'upzone' the R-4.5 portion of the site, which was denied, claims that } the findings given at the time are no longer valid due to changed circumstances. A - ; s denied recommendation for acity-initiated zone change by itself does not qualify fora r , physical change of circumstance. Staff agrees, however, that changes have taken a 11 j place since this portion of the site was zoned R-4.5 which enhance its ability to r accommodate medium density housing- Since the site was assigned R-7 (equal to t t current R-4.5) zoning in 1982, the following improvements to the transportation system , . ~ that serves the site were planned and implemented: 5 ` • , {yet a - • Intersection improvements (1989) and signal installation (1992) at Bonita & Hall; - ` z • Widening of Durham Road between Summerfield and Hall (1990); k ~k x • Widening of Durham Road between Hall and Upper Boones Ferry Road (currently ~~r under construction). r } • Transit service initiated by Tri-met along Hall Boulevard (1993) h,T 1 - -J The site now meets all criteria for Medium Density under the Comprehensive Plan's - Locational Criteria section (see Locational Criteria, Policy 12.1.1(2) below). j~ ~ ~ ~ " I The applicant states that a mistake has been made in the zoning designation on the R- N ; ~t 12 eastern portion of the site (see application, page 20). Staff agrees that a mistake f , ? T'- ' was made in changing the Comprehensive Plan and zoning from Urban Low Density/R- ; u,, 5 to Medium Density/R-12. R-5 is a former City designation which meant 5,000 square foot minimum lot sizes and is equivalent to the current R-7 designation. The City - I Aso Council initiated annexation of this site in August of 1981 and assigned R-5 zoning. ~ ~ The Boundary Commission approved the annexation request in March of 1982. Thew, 1 Interim Zoning Map of 1983 and all zoning maps thereafter, however, show the eastern P ; portion of the site zoned R-12. Staff could find no official record, including staff report - n -F and findings, regarding the rezoning of this area from R-5 to R-12. For this reason, e staff believes that an error was made in reassigning an R-12 zoning to this site. x~ x f r ' Citizen Involvement: Policy 2.1.1 states that the City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an , opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The notice for the i ~ " planning commission hearing was sent to surrounding property owners within 250 feet of j a the affected property, posted at Tigard City Hall and advertised in a local newspaper. In f i ~ addition, the applicant provided notice of and conducted a neighborhood meeting on r . [E 4 - - J 1. I -w M1 1 4 ~ c - 3 r J. r 1 J` }j T r r ' [ _ 5' ri h F Ja tt _ .s. J A. 1~ L _ _ s 1 y 41 F v _ t _ F ,y '1 k F a l€\ Y.,,,,,.,, k r "Im I r . , , , , ~ n 5 x ~ , . ~ . i , ~ : - ~ : , I , .1. I I I f " . - , , , . , r , - - ~ ~ 7 : , , ,r . , , - ~ , ~ r I I . . I I . I , 11 I I ~ I - o ~ ~ I I I ~ I ~ - ~ : r I I ~ . , . . 4 1 ~ I ~ - , - , ~ ~ I . . I r ~ I . I I W , - . - T~ - y '7 - - - - - - _ - tt-! F - - - - - - - - ' - _ - a b - - - ~L - I t - ,i. - - - - - - - ~ ? C f _....a...____. -___...~__..-_e........-.u+-wxw.+s.w.w.w......- Y....__. } } - f T m.+ - F..r - - C 541. - . 1:1 11 I I .1 ~ IL , 1 ~ ^ March 19, 1996, for property owners within a 250-foot radius of the affected property and other interested parties. This policy is satisfied. , tr,. ` Housing: Policy 6.1.1 states that the City shall provide an opportunity fora Y diversity of housing densities and residential types at various prices and rent levels. It is primarily implemented through OAR 660-07, the Metropolitan Housing Rule. A The rule requires the city maintain sufficient residential buildable land to provide the opportunity for at least 50% of new units to be attached single family or multi-family - housing and to provide for an overall density of ten units per acre. Because the R-7 K zoning district is included in the range of zoning districts through R40) used by 'the :1 City in the calculation of attached single-family or multi-family housing, the net affect of ,.1 the zone change would result in an increase from 77% to 78% of new units being of this i ` e. In addition, there would be one additional unit of housing added to the City's ' i type. tY' i inventory under the proposed rezone. The proposal would not, therefore, affect the City's " g ;.'.-~_T - , ,r L~ L " - L , , "M current housing opportunity index of 10.46 units per acre. This policy is satisfied. z , ' ~ 1 Transportation - Traffic Ways: Policy 8.1.1 states that the City shall plan for a `0 7 , -`1 safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and r anticipated future growth and development. As a directive to the City, this policy t , w=t requires planning for a street system that can meet current and future needs based on s ti £.T n r 1 the land uses it must support. Hall Boulevard has been designated as an arterial and k ~ Sattler Street a Minor Collector on the City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. J k y These designations support the existing zoning of the subject site. Under the proposed V x a t i 3 I zoning, the residential development potential is virtually the same as that under the - 1.* r x existing zoning. Based on the City's density calculation method, the existing zoning , could yield 190 units and the proposed zoning could yield 191 units on the site. Upon r~ I I 11, development of the site under either scenario, the developer will be required to dedicate K ~ } rY necessary rights-of-way(s) and install the necessary street improvements to implement the street standards of Hall Boulevard and Sattler Street which will maintain a safe and ` T _ r 11 efficient roadway system. This policy is satisfied. w j Locational Criteria: Policy 12.1.1(2) provides the locational criteria for designating land as Medium Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan map. It is x s ' ~ 4A , _ I intended that the locational criteria be construed in a flexible manner, in the E;~ _ i interest of accommodating proposals which, though not strictly in conformance i with the applicable criteria, are found to be in the public interest and capable of ? F harmonious integration into the community. The burden of proving conformance r f of the proposal with the criteria varies with the degree of change and impact on the r V community: the more drastic the change and the greater the impact, the more - strictly the criteria should be construed. The applicable locational criteria with findings are as follows: 4 r a j b £ ' 3 , ~4y I C k 5 r n t t x . n, `I, j 4 4 - _ I b xi 3 1 [ I k` j t t, j - 4 y -`s - ~ = _ v w - _ _ e_ _ . - _'J - , - - . ` f t - F57 "I'll, - ~ , - I , ~ - - ~ ~ I I , I ~ - - , ~ - , - - - -j ~ F , M a ~ ~ , - I , 1'_~_", ,,:~,,~"4""--~.."~,'-;'~~"",.,",.~~,--~',,-----,~,',,,-~,~-~,,-~,,,~,,,'..;--.-,,,-~~--,,~,,~~-~~,n~,,,~-'z-~~~~I - - - d { t _ 1 1 -s - Fries 5q av $ - - C - - - i . : - - _ _ -y, - - - - 4 . ......._d~ __...v.._r......F.,.......a..~~. _d.v_.• ,T , s _ a - 3 - - " t- - - a '',3 , k Tt y f Nv~- - 5- - . 1t }L X - k L r' A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for ' OD medium density on the plan map: (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development; , - x~ -i z x _ ` The surrounding area is zoned for a mix of low and medium density development: ' `~Q r To the north of the entire site and south of the western portion of the site are Low ~~~,M , Density Residential districts; to the east, west and southeastern portion of the site . r rv l - - are Medium Density Residential districts. This area is not, therefore, corur-nilled to low density development. ,h s (2) Areas which have direct access from collector or arterial streets; ~ ° f r s { The site has direct access to Hall Boulevard, an arterial, and Sattler Street, a minor F 'fr' t r; collector. " (3) Areas which are not subject to development limitations such as E , ` , t:} _ , _ topography, flooding, poor drainage; ~ - The site is not constrained by development limitations. The two wetland areas ;y I ti identified in the City's Inventory are farm ponds with no adjacent tree vegetation, x~ I F - s totally grazed by cattle and contain no recognizable emergent vegetation. They ,s have received the lowest functional value of any wetlands in the City. The letter e~ 7F-,- $ from the Division of State Lands considers these water bodies as stock ponds _ is I ,C and states that there is no wetland area surrounding the ponds. ~ a y i i , - .Ax 9 IA I (4) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional `l', F development; ' M - ~r The existing facilities and services have adequate capacity to accommodate # 1-1 , development at the site. The proposal would allow virtually the same number of z " -11 residential units as the existing zoning. Sanitary sewer, storm and water lines are N6 located in Hall Boulevard, Sattler Street and 88th Avenue. The street system is s~3 designated to handle additional traffic. The detailed analysis and evaluation of f ; service ca aci and needed im rovements will be addressed as r P tY P part of the ~ ~ E. s s s development review process. ~ ` 1, 41, $ } # I t$ i i s,, 5 1t (5) Areas within one-half mile of public transportation; and , q ~ . I Tri-met bus service is available along Hall Boulevard. x k= . 1 F rw' k (6) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in n ' ' order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential ` . rt ` t tr 11 areas. r TX3 11 '2 ` t r W a x1' r - 6 a r "pz...' p - ,~-.J-ik -J, n 4 - _ - S° - ` F, - - 1. 3 { F 3. q,++b^~:.*' aa,exa~*:xr::f+. - XR< .r-, a - ~4•€ ( ,i r' - x - i 11 _ "e r S F h i f 1 t,~ .G 4',"l;-,-,,: - i14 - - "€k Yr" 111 : a- - . - Fx' ~r" t i - ~ ~ J~ .;.-4- ~ ~ F~ I j- ; r , . 3 I ,r " I ~ 1-r 4 ~ ~ , " ~ _ ~ : ~ ~ - - I . . ~ ~ ~ , J s - 3 a T, r ' -s i -r t i 5# F[ L 1..k.l -Y y ? f k - 3pi i a j ry i2 I E ~ . I - _ ~ ~ . , . ~ r , - ~ - I - ; ~ 'r ~r - - , , , W - . - ' . - _ - r4Y 3 - F F d 5 - -177 T t 1 i F4 1' L K t - f1 v3- - ~~.._...-.....+....e.......«...-.......~..........~......».~~ wiw~ _ _.__......._a..a.,......_.__~ ...........u y 4t 1 SF""' k 1 Y F~~ F d , The proposed area can be adequately buffered from the low density residential , area on the north side of Sattler Street and along the southern boundary of the site through the density transition, buffering and screening requirements of the Community Development Code. These requirements would be addressed during ® subdivision review when an application is submitted to the City. Based on the above facts, Policy 12.1.1(2) is satisfied for locating a Medium Densityf Residential area on the western portion of the subject site. s "loop COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Amendments to the Title and Mao: Section 18.22 of the Community Developments . n x L~ > t ; Code sets forth standards and procedures for quasi-judicial amendments to &.0 plan and zoning district map. A recommendation or a decision to approve, 5~s r ; approve with conditions, or to deny an application for a quasi judicial amendment x shall be based on all of the following standards: f s vN, t ? a r, ` The applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designation; and the ~x a ' change will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the community; t The applicable plan policies related to the proposal are reviewed above under # 9z Compliance With Comprehensive Plan Policies. Based upon the facts and findings in ~ - this report, staff has determined that the proposed amendment and rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the community. J ns The statewide planning goals adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter p 197, until acknowledgment of the comprehensive plan and ordinances; The m Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, therefore, specific review of each =r a - statewide planning goal is not necessary. Notice of this proposed amendment has been provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development for comment _ r at least 45 days prior to the final decision date. ra" x The applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable f€fs y~~ implementing ordinance; Code section 18.52 (R-7: Single-Family Residential) contains ! the standards for the R-7 zone. The proposed site could meet the standards listed underz ' Dimensional Requirements (18.52.050) and Additional Requirements (18.52.060), Y ~E including the residential density transition provisions of 18.40.040, for a single-family E l development. Specific future site development improvements will be reviewed through k' the subdivision procedures to ensure consistency with Community Development Code a x standards. ` Evidence of change in neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency l to in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the C 3`'- -4 ~ i t 1 n t 3 7 y E i a y F r; - f . t ~ r P - f Sd _A Y } t C ~ xxF - - Z t 3k 4 Y~ ,t 1- £ - - - 7 Y M d, ....-1, 3 .u... x - - _1 r Y `"mss , , r - - - - - - t 1 t -Z, v'' - a~........_,y.J....w.....-.......o,.....,,..,...,,<,,.,,.......-.....-..._._._..- .._...-.-____._.w_,- .-....-e......_ 1 - _ 'e F - ri K s _.F _ - 1 L` 3 - subject of the development application. See above under Compliance With P Comprehensive Plan Policies, Policy 1.1.2. a x f r Procedures for Decision Making - Quasi-Judicial: Section 18.32 of the k' J x~ c-_ ~ r Community Development Code sets forth the procedural requirements for review<.. of uasi= udicial la d `j''=<~"`r ~'3 N°'-~`'' q I p n amen menu. The application has been processed in k 4 accordance with Code Sections 18.32.020, 18.32.050 and 18.32.060; a hearing has r~ t;~ ` ' been conducted by the Planning Commission according to 18.32.090(D); and the . - ® requirements for notification of the hearings have been met according to 18.32.130 and { v _ 18.32.140. 11 , ~M', ' Yiaili~c~ Desel^I--- - - Section 18.80 of the Community Development Code sets ~ il ? forth the approval process and elements of a planned development overlay r~ designation. Sactic^ 18.80.015 states that this overlay zone shall be processed in the F same manner as a zone change under the provisions of Chapter i8.32 (Procedures for " F Decision Making: Quasi-judicial). This application is indeed being processed according, d " , 5,;- to Chapter 18.32. The also meets the requirements r ice proposal of Section 18.80.060, , ? Planned Development Allowed and Disallowed, because the affected site is classifedY. as a developing area. The remaining requirements of this code section, which address r ' . implementation of the Planned Development overlay, will be reviewed upon siibllission ; w rt,~+ ! of a development plan. This policy is satisfied. - A~, e- ~ ~ w-- ~ 4 - , ~ ~ ~ COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS: - z -i f :fit -1 -p Oregon Administrative Rule: Section 660-12-060 requires that comprehensive ` 1i tr; I amendments which significantly affect a transportation facility shall assure I that allowed land uses are consistent with identified function, capacity and level of f , g service of the facility. The proposed amendmenUzone change would result in a net x r ~ f - _ change of one additional residential unit allowed on the site. This change would not , fi`~ - ~ significantly affect a transportation facility. ODOT agrees and did not require or request a ? ~ . t , ~ 11 - i traffic study of the proposal. This rule is satisfied. ~3c - I { A5i g v , i at ~,Z - ~ t .3 - C. DECISION it 4 ?t ~ aF The City Council APPROVES the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1' ~ i CPA 96-0004 and Zone Change ZON 96-0003/PD 96-0002 based upon the r, } foregoing findings and conclusions. t ' 7r { s I ` r i ,?'117.c - E - C sj z t 4 Z- .l ,m+mas..^.Y9Tih 4-` =*T. sic t1 + - i ff J- I' -'-k ~ -.-f~,,~~:;`.-<j~-' -:Vr~~ - , - I 1. ~7,~,:,-_ ~ - " ~ " ~ . I T : , , ~ , , - 1, ~ ' r - - , k I ~ jV,',~ N ~ j-1, r - " r~ , , . I , i ~ r ' ' 1 - , : - - " , ~ , J , , 1~~ , I - } _ 5 t ,I - F 7 1xYry- 3~r Y d - <t + - f T- p } 7 ! ~ , , [ _ - 'g 4 - _ - { { - S y - 9 - - • - 'E f 4 f' _ y 1 N ! E r - k v ry eel t t an or roam E)G]]Brr 15 ~ k x - deft - . i ✓ ~L' IN 3 L r A _ W _ a DAWN A L7,I, WES X ROES C 1 / tea®. iu~ 0,0 1: 1 HAML _ i r a y, r L ~ y v~ :O 4 I~HJ `o T ` - t y..r ~ u ~i~ p6 ` ` try ~r CT "O C v,--i r - r j p y aF '0 r% a ® w E d i ~ I I C L j s + t DURHAM RD t rll 34", Z": j i } E tI iI t t~~ LL CompmhenaNe Plan Map Amendment. - - Zane Change.nd Phoned Demlopmenl CvedaY 1 m ® - / Vicinity Map Loa Dena fy lR 4S b Med um Denay R-7(Pp) Note: Map is not to scale - Propoaetl Zone Change and Ptanned Development _ N Overlay hem R-12 to R.7(PD). t ft ~ a 7 - .?s~•~;,+ry~ r...,u„~n.., a.,_...a.~.,~-,iz..W r ..,~..,.•....~...~..._..,,a.+w.^..:-t~'v.,a.;9.w.a:•.~c..-e..a.a:~~-..:..a.~..aa,...~,v:.v..rv_rcc.~€:.~>r.~.~..,4.'~ ~,t_ hx P ' ~ s,: vi _ r SJsn - U-P r z { 3 A 1-Q v ct c, t L (-n .14 oZ Y 1 ~J 1 ~J (S cf~M ~ ~ ~ ` r - cl 1 -f - a ~ r f~ r 'I 7~z 4 44 IBM- O (~~Ae`YA /Y'~'.B~/e l~iwrCK!rV aili'v f F! ~t.~rrrtJ .,-t r ~ v t[{ h ~ tf l f 1 ~ 'M' _ - x 4 r~ S F ~ ~ FF a 2 k r ,s, ~ 4t ~ ~ 1 t~ i ~ 's 4Y>~'3 mT: .nr.Rr - .'4%'.,. {z'+"u"u:"tt Y/•-+z ~.~y- P P ~ t _ .f ~ ; i ,T ~ ~1 4 J f # f f n L 4 3' I 5~C[ i t c AE'' ,r.. Jp rte'{ S , r 4 . - - - , 4 - t 1, - 1-1 nmgj, ~c ,i - - - J, - , ""s,-4'ia-'~ t" -tx'4 t -s - a k _w r - t m ~ a ~,p'''T s - `a - a _ P r fir, -.a - t' s - - k . 4 150i ~ _t -1, yx c:. R 1. r ..fit - rttiT 3 r .r'• -1- f i Y Irv a - + r+ _a - V ,-pepending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of - s Q`~? . t4,z n w` ` , a each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may ' .1, - t' further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement} 1117, , a .,raltestimony. fc ~ I F•1VAA „ITEM NO. ry DATE: August 13, 1996 ` s~ x- 6 11 INAR6 f PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - VACATION OF APPROXIMATELY 6,445 SQUARE ! 4 ' O r Ire FEET OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY LOCATED ON SW 135TH AVENUE . x ; -11 . f The request was initiated by the City Council on June 11, 1996. Any interested person may w - dr--. v appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacation of said public right of way. Any 1 -11 - .r r. t t I,- I Wriiien objec-us or onst7'^.. c-s shall be filed with the City Recorder by August 13.1996, by - ro a r 11 .r 7:30 p.m.*r~ a x -y"v" ,g'g £a z PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS _1_1_1 I'll, L' 5 d i n Y _ ~ z. r F L 11 y? h t f } A 3 7 t4 11 I N - - ~ ,,I 1,~ E, , f. . L - ~'-i~-T, ` sr. y ~ as ~s.-,, ,W -1 '~5,, d of r R i - t a tC' ^r n' s.) pW'~t i - 'L S k x d5 - cc [h J 3 ~n c 2 r t 4 x~u ~kr r 4 j - tip I, Ks d5 ' _ - °r I S `1 'fie AN _ '~r~ ;'I` t -~'s I ,I T Y Q€ f 1, J f k , ,,i, ~0` ,.^--r.-„-. .^.w.oFSx,,;xwer xirm~. w~- ...~..,y., ''--.w.~.,+ .e ,ys. 's a° -t,£.- 11 - M_'' l $a F i' L 3b F i y - 4 1 1 , . , I I ~.,~i~ ~ I i ,,'--"7 - -,r-"";"-.,.,51."~""I-~.,.~,,,,~,*-,~-,~, , I - R, +`n f, r i' p _ 9 v{ w ~ T 4 {E ! ,4 ( p,~ . 0 ` , , " F - t K Iw.~-^^~._"'.^C`..`.,r.e...~n-.moo-.-~ ~~T:.~"R~".a. ~..~..•~r-"+~ J. _ hT - inr. ~I .A.. .-L 7__~_ L 'ri.-.Y -i-2'. 777- i . - c k _ { F ~~ac~ t Hei ~ ~f s'e -rt r x F 4 t - s a~ -s x is'3 t+~ s 4 } a4a 113RA v&-M. -5 -D ~ ,h ' Y A 0.:.-r !s a PLEASE PRIN t -u' " - Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) @; a£ ? 7 4 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. t T,- tin Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. a Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ; Ks r r f Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. F`r°xr F.,'_ j ame, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. tx *T~n r 1 m L ° 5r F Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 4Y z ¢ 4 T 5 P-Y xaT f , s ~s } E Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. r` !c Eta„{{, ' a~x> t r y y s. r * a ~e ° Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No.rr T k # Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. r Mff' - -Ur ~ - 7t'3' 341 i it y igy' j S YT Ly Y~ y.E "S`..^SYYYYS ~ 5 i Y ( _ -R2 7777~~ k t ky :ti f 7hZ f l 'l w- -C ~ -YA ~ _ _ 4 # L S _ T -f - 0"ht - - 9 { { 5q'k tl _ 1 Y 2S a J~ - Y L Y~ _ ~ S -Mr ' , ~PENN -WSAY "haF too - `~i •a~ii t`r is ~ # ~'.{.t~ -~,-~<~q,~-.~ l S 4 ~ m z # r I ;-g" 3 . TO; 41 - 4 .iii lk M) 2, IMP ount of f3 € t3¢ { q depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the am my person has to speak- We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may e;3zxaw s t,:.. _ ;Ett_, t e each it to su ent =r >Nt fi 4ur fur c FFlem t t r' 9 further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Coon i r oral testimony. F I m-1 W%wb ITT D4~.'I'E:;"August 13; 1996....1 Avkd•`Li~17?l1.lt - K.,t~< ;aALLi •sR ~mv y` PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-0002 r ,h AKA BUSINESS SERVICES (Set over from the July 9,1996 Council meeting.) n REQUEST: Amend the text of policy 12.2.1(2)(1a) of the Comprehensive Plan to modify the spacingY# S F and locational criteria for General Commercial land uses. LOCATION: City Wide. ZONE: N/A s APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11 and 12; Tigard Comprehensive Piai policies ,.l.l(a), i ..i •.1f~c„ 2.1.1, 5,4; 6.1.1, 81.1 and 1222; Tigard Community Development Code chapter 18.30; and Oregon Administrative Rule Chapter 660, Division 12. S` shy, r ' ,l l z xRO" x Q _ PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS 4M 5 o ee 1 _ ~S } s V-4., fix- - - RAW shot k { ysr WON_ W" Von w-«z"s' k r m A - k INV Y 44.E b - d 4 fr.~ - G ,ptJ ~l 'S zr'T 4 + SJS ~Ra ~5 L vt~ RE, ~TT '.f~.7 z' 42, 'A 0111 its =rt z z , TVA W Oil t RKA ~111- L - - F 'u-.a y1 .Y ~ - ~ 1 - - - - ate s { \ h~i r k `it - z~3 7 i T-<+''" Y ry - rs., s -rt _ ; y~3 { r`y.~-~k a.. 4 ,a r ~AG~,~T~A,.ITEM NO. _ } _ PL ,AS . PRINT $ K Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) 34 r Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Addre~s,a~nd Phone No. y1//iG~~,~~ etyei, ' l VV t P20rTLAI.O Op- °112x'{-►Zt~b 4`11 4 ~ ~ 7s~3 w . _ hone No. Name, A ress and Phone No. C 3 9 ~ / ~S ~ - Name, Addr n , / A k j 3 2 1 G 5 vj "VIM f it/ ~ L c~ t Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Gay zv~7 ~ - } N/ Z~M 4 Name, Address and Phone No. N e, ddress and Phone No. ` 3 j Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. j,?x ' Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ENV - i - i My Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No.~ r ' t it-ARV." s R~o Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. + N. s a. r d d Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. { 3 t F Sa ~ a°Ki : `i k br 4 t F -.r£ y c a , r a s 1 f t 4 t r tz r y rT ( _ r ~ ~ ~ A _ - S - try„, ` - - - - - - - - - - . : _ -s # t s Ky i 4 s st,t t FY k y s - s Yy~ a"zY - - F-_ - 9 "k. f _ ate' 1 _ 1 g .S` Jr ~sa xv ~1 X.rt-_' v ,J Hsui f- a ~x4Ls: 1 (lJ'~.~`'S AgQ~I_CL ; tc." _ s ^y,"~-.r , t „J-- _ L ,..may c § I "NE 3 5fi d j ~k.;,, d ~y t ' x. # CITY OF TIGARD SETT/NG THE S7ANl~ARn FORS RV/CE E.XCEI I ENCE. r z-',}~`"a' w - tR OREGON 'I ---w - x _ 's. - 3r,..~s..~~. -'.7 f~ Y k ` ! To: Honorable Mayor & City Council '~ha`44' ' i Y - 1k ~ `_g'- C.'Y k Company: r 4 e1 - 1-1 . Ott x, ? r - Phone' E `a r't ~ r. 'y Fax: e ' r 3 From: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder ' r x s U r Company: City of Tigard , l Phone: (503)639-4171 1 Fi ~~r . ~ _ Fax: (503) 684-7297 ' w F _ r Date: August 12, 1996 _ ' ~`~4- Pages including this page: 6 ~ " a- i ; 4• Y'`-`'43f"',~',.,i y 'Yet Y~ i 'N OMMENT$: r' a AA-t 5 a " F63 a E Z' 1 Attached are two copies of letters received from Mr. & Mrs. J.E. Morgan expressing their concern I ,may-_ tin W - -1 ~M with process at a recent planning commission meeting. This information was referred to the -t' ~ I- Community Development Department. Staff will be prepared to respond to this issue at tomorrow - x ! night's council meeting. z ~ W~ Ey b ! d P 'ra J'~ 9 sY "}n`~ ~w,, 1 v, n' r a 1 ' - h s' t' - ki S s x t T _ ~ , m 4x f t° ^S,- 3 y .1A . 2 _ '11-1-111 ' P' i -3 F is - P ~ - j ' -Y +"1' - . r s - _F; y~ a j~n r sr City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 > 3~ K ` , r - rs -r 4 _ °x e?P'~ E F ~ PLEASE DELIVER THIS FAX IMMEDIATELY f , q _ 1 ti _ is\admlcaihyVactmargan.dac +~a 2 $K 's F•. _,n " - _ _ s - fi r Y" tj f - f { P 1, f { ~ L ~ xis n' -t 1 - w wa'< a _ ,-,,,.-•um' - t ".'_'"".,k t t k t~'i Y`~' -i 's- a- 7 - r 4t a tub t - _ r, { z 1 r , ,41 1 ~ L , , , , , _1' ~ _ ~ ~ , , ~ L L . : ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ , , ~ e~ ~ ~ , , --'i, -__j - - r - ? _ - st 4 h 'f - - k t 7} a r r d _ y 's.4 I. j _ - -x k 5 s aE i y J - f L f r r t-r - - x 4'' 'f t r - J - > ✓ a - - _ r 7r f it'.--' -..a _ ~.sue _ _ f'' ~fffi fi t, - - ; t - - - - N - _-"z" " , ~ W", S ~ QN. > } 9 ?zit a'~~, . x. _ ~ s ._,._._._...m. ,tv, ~y~ .~~F ~ k ~ 'i IS k~ V c it s -t ~ NZ " - --:7k s4 *1 0W Z14 - ~rl r ,iviitft ~ ~k ` `,f` AU6 071996 x , r - s tt 2 4 T_ Z WiOtA` 3 - It a Aug. 6 r 1996 _y~,,.r~ „ts e x A F St - - Y w,s i~';i City Council ~ s $ ~ c C1ty Of Tigard au~i`"' , , „ 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. , 'IL - `fir = . j Tigard , Or. 97223 ~ ''gr- > - 0-,10 i cr„ A II 1 To Whom It May Concerns 1; ~ ~ F, f Be informed, it is the intention of the residents ad ~acent to the I- % - L 2. i ~ - i - - F YA't'~rsr r 4 p~ 3 ;'k Si ~ I proposed site development under the title of Carriage House Apartments - on S. W. Pfaffle, to submit a petition at the next council meeting: {Ss ~r -q r ~s _ 3I requesting the revocation of approval given to Andrews Management Ltd. g~.~ -1 as ~c~ { - r,,4 for variance of one access instead of two access at this site, until, y - there is an updated traffic study of Pfaffle made. r r 3 Y k It is our understanding that the traffic study upon which this ~ approval was made was done in 1995 prior to the density of traffic I %E U x t - on Pfaffle resulting from the opening of Cubs Food and Costco in the LC 4 - F Triangle. -11", We also intend to request that, based upon the new study, an update~1~ F~. IF r n ; of the traffic system in that area be undertaken, if warranted. -,Y Vla wilt haves our petitions at the next council meeting on August 13th pis" " ` %RnF- W 5 S P q .I 11- ' at 6:30 P.M. for your perusal and reply. ` $ Very rul ours, rz 4 a i~ i V~ 3 5 v i Mr. d Mrs. J. E. Morgans ° p¢wI S 30 O S. W. 7 h - n ~ ~ ? Phone: 6840913 Tigard 97223 , _ ~ , Es a 2 r M Mr - m& V °s _z k f ; Fr - 7" ar'f 4 r v _ Y k i{ td' }.x,, , , V2 ~ dom. K . k~, . , r, .r,,. i' `2'3?F ",.T'-q 4"" _ ' s Y..4ar, s-r ea =,.~s x _ _ ~,r x vr'w M~, t".. "xs wy'a xw r. ':e*:rw.vY*' - ;.''n-c~ 2i..:;;"t... s .f _ { " F ~ * x 3r d. ,;y 11 h`.r y 5{'r , ~ e r _ e t 'a' r rr 111114 c E - - s . _ r J, 4 't t j -..1 x `F }4 Sgt l v, r 7' r e 3, k.. _ r .1 L - , ~ , , ~ I - I I - , I _ . , . T-, , M w W VCia*t' - " 1 SOME ? ~""a do 5- tr { - y c ^TrF ? - aim sr~: ~."~-r 5 x s x'-~ ~ - -1 1 x ~ - T - % ig- a r~ o August 6, 1996 Kw City Council City of Tigard ' r ' r - 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 OrdYx ra To Whom It May Concern: We, the undersigned, request hereby that the council enter on their` n »6a N z agenda for public discussion, the concerns of residents surrounding - n r ` the proposed site for 84 unit apa--tn,ent complex known as Carriage x 7 _ Rey _ sa i - House Apartments at the^soonest possible date. F+ 4 ti This, we hope, would give us an open forum for the expression of , k our varied concerns regarding this project, before the construction _ has begun. ?rfr a Name Address PS Sid. 6<4 51T T/(a~1+e0 D~3 K• C w -t 70- iGic s _ 77 P f_p v o a/. 5 rn µt `fi 722.3 H' Z-V - ~ ~ ~ :max „.,~a•~'`~~ i Fr-ED fit c11 y z3 Pk L S ~ T$ 'A'1-~ i~ IF i "k S lwV ♦ l~ 1/~ L~ aid 1/ w n 7fa i [k j 'IJP x,32 t. t V eQ t go -.F-..• -i, ~ sus c- - ''7`;iz~'. _ _ 4-' h / .try t A-=YN~t - Y l ~ E mss. t u 4t - ~ r k t ' S , ° ~ xl'~ F d~" ta s _ s sir *k t 55 - 1" 2 _ a- t 1 r r w~ ti 5 ;,4s",F y $ kx , } !W i !1 ti&f~4_~~,"7~~Z' ~_it-;4 ~ T- , ~ ,~-_;-"r ~ - ~ , , , - ~ , _J _ ~ ...1. ~~,~~.,-",!-r!,, ~ , - ~ , , " , , ~ - - - , - ~ ~t~! , ~ ~ - - ~ -1-1 ~ ~ V 1, t~: ~ " ` - M, , , 11 MN, t?,-" i "'I - I _,ipa k k t- 4 - . E , - , - I, , . , , 7, >:4 'r- t v.,. - # ..t* '4 F - - - - - J y- - ~7 ors P-..t h f- _ r- - - s ? 5 F ,r r } z a a AUG 0 7 1996 > 7 sh ut5 x - August 6, 1996 i / e e' 'ir u? r x_. . n«F 4 x ur 3,3 r t ,4 . Mayor Nica! i ' ~4R P Msxr~_. y f I - r City of Tigard 11 , -1, I 13125 SW Hall Blvd. -x -_101- . .11 ~j ~F , .44 Ti ord. Or. 97223si r k' g Res Public Hearing 8/5} 3 File: Carriage House Apts s r ,4 ~ ' Dear Mayor Nicoli: ~Y 41 _ I represent several residents of the Pfaffle Street area, the Mrr it, ~ i t+ a~ ,,r 'u m } location of proposed subject site development. We wish to entea a r ~ . t~ 1-1 complaint regarding the public meetin of which we were notified b x`i~I N 1 y g y' y, z the aiiached flyer. 5} 5 5 ti In response to that flyer many of us appeared at the Aug. 5th [;~=',^T '0ir° z meeting of the Planning Commission, under the impression that we w were meeting to discuss a variance requested by the developer for a'~Y Y ~ ,7~~-, o- z c ~,F provision of only one access for this 84 unit apartment complex in- ii _ ~~ti r stead of the two access drives required by code. I think if you read t z ~a ~ 11 I t d t§ r the Public Hearin g Notice attached you will come to that conclusion _f G i ~x C A - also. When we appeared and tried to testify, we were told that the 5i x matter of access was already decided and the granted tYg ~ permit had been ` % r -1 "W I ~z,~,~.""-~~,~,~'~~,,.,~'~-..-~, ~-,7- [ I »~a f and that we were "in the wrong place" to discuss our concerns pertain- Mfg s~xss~ a a ing to it. r ~ T IfL J We feel we were listened to only in a defferential manner and -s{~ 1F sr,-~ 11 1 thoughout were treated as second class citizens with no forum to ex- ACH~ - _ g} dYi3f } press our opinions regarding the matter. In other words, it was in- { $ x „ i- F, timated that we were wasting the commission's time. We know we masted ' -Y,--,- , . _ our time. rt a 11, f r - ?t z ,°r * a x Therefore, we request you censor the commission either for errone- z:t a ";~ously wording the hearing notice or not allowing the residents of the x c~ r , of t~;y x ~'-ter ,rr 3 ,''4 'r area to fully express their objections. 'ar ,r ,'w ; Very truly yours, 'r a. , Phone: 684 0913 a - - ti ~r~&1 r_ E Mo .C,------- rgan si , C- f ~~,.v _ "'ak,"" r= :<'„~„nx. .x-~yE' >,f~:;s 7G'Y~r/~.C,------- S 'd i't 2z 4 ti ! " - ~ , - , Yin - - a >ar t~-.,a ~ a r -yr~3t W - t S - _ k J, sr x , M z { 4~(- f _ 3 - i i .swk ,fig A n { _ - s - z ro } #m..x. F - ? - Ei~ ! S y - - P R I f -7771 Ez i G Y t t- ~;tl~ .C,y,:3; - ....r..a... r.e w,...,.w.w........_ . _ . w >...s.x....aa_-m..e 46rsswn... - CITY OF TIGARD I a PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT A MEETING ON F E z1 MONDAY AUGUST 5. 1996 AT YJQ Pivi, IN THE TOWN 'BALL OF THE IGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 F SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: APPEAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0007 S r VARIANCE (VAR) 96-0005 FILE TITLE: CARRIAGE HOUSE APARTMENTS _ Y y L: APPELLANT: James E. McGuire et. Al. 44111 APPLICANT: Andrews Management, Ltd. ^vv~ JER: Sa~ e 4000 SW Kruse Way, Suite #270 F ~a Lake Oswego, OR 97035 REQUEST The original request is for the following development applications: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a seven building, 84 unit multi-family apartment complex; and 2.) A Variance request to allow the provision of one access, whereas, the code requires two access drives for this development. The t r appeal specifically concerns alleged nuisances of lights, noise and reduction of { property value. - r LOCATION: South side of SW PfafFle Street, east of SW Hall Boulevard, and west of SW Pacific r Highway (WCTl41 1 S1 36CC, Tax Lots 200, 300 and 2200). I APPLICABLE REVIE`N'~' fi CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 5 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. F[ t ipL ~ " ZONE: R-25 (Residential, 25 Units Per Acre). The R-25 zone allows single-family attached, single-family detached, duplex residential units, multiple family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, and accessory structures. a THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE r TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER t 1e.3n,M~ 1 !kSsii IVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL M ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED l APPEAL OF SDR S&0007NAR 96 WS CARRIAGE HOUSE APTS. /NOTICE OF 815196 P.C. PUBLIC HEARING ra3 - - - . , ~i 74 J, L r t e 3 -77 -TF1 ;`x N5 ,3~' ~r.~Wxw..++mi ..t~:~ L 2 L-.cv- .s ~ .....+..a....._ - ..-..d............. .y...... _ L BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT 320 (VOICE) OR (503)`684- 2772 DD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE " HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR SET-UP. _ __r a x ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION: MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBIS" , HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPOi~ PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON /1\I ARL-~ 1111 V I! G A19A E AFF1/~AT v _ TKG nl-t'LICAI IVN. IF A PERSON SUBViI I.~ EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO in nruvn nn nr I cry YSr~ 1 10, t - ~ m, 1996. ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO k CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR k DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE r I CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST x e - - 3 PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. e -.i FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND, PRECLUDES AN APPEAL AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COivinni. NII'r DEVELOPMENT1 CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE - BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. i a ,-r- ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION s ` - L AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25t) PER PAGE, OR THE CURREI . r RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO TH+' - r 3 k3 HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25t) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR { s COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. ti FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER WILLIAM D'ANDREA AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. :t t-= `r I r ~ f t r'Y ~ z % } V I 3 ~t f N: 7 APPEAL CF SDR 90-0007NAR 960005 CARRIAGE HOUSE APTS. NOTICE OF SISM P.C. PUBLIC HEARING } d y x y yy y~ b 4 77 ~ji 5, -max ~ . - - - - - - wt ^.~N ct ' ~ - - - - w.iC.'tw- .s..:Ytrh..viraw..iJ.JatiSig-✓ ....w'.+.,....r--......-.:....:. S BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 0394171, 0CI7. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) her t 2772 (TDO - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR SET-UP. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBUC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT e PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER JULY 15•, - 1991 ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO a CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PAR i iCIPA::T IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN M DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPUCA13LE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE + } TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR Nil I DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE t ' µr CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE E I u SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND, PRECLUDES AN4 APPEAL AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE t BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. j 5 r z ~x ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN 1 HE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION L AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25t) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE r4 r- t HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT. WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY ' r CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. L+i Hpx f k ' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER WILLIAM D'ANDREA AT L r y' y (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. I L~. t f a~ - +Fpm OF SCR 86-=T VA 860005 CMPo HOUSE APTS. NOTICE OF 815%F C. FUWUC PZ\R]W, 4 ? s+ F r • k A ] C - - - _ 4] 2 ~ F j- F r ~ l a 44 3~~$ ~ _,.7 a sm'~ r.g«u.3nw«..m...._a_._...,.~.. .~.....,w..=.v.~c.,=~...-r.....,,®...~....:_.:.,~..._. " - 't r Y.~ Ng mm~ >•%3~'~ ~ 'ter r-'. t'd°, 3~~r - _ g k E UNDERSIGNED REQUEST A REVOCATION OF THE VARIANCE APPROVAL GIVEN BYS ti } y 1 r`- x---_" THE CITY OF TIGARD TO ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD. FOR A SINGLE ACCESS AT s xt PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE KNOWN AS CARRIAGE HOUSE APARTMENTS ON S.W. PFAFFLE UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT A REVIEW MAY BE MADE OF THE CURRENT Nr - `c* TRAFFIC PROBLEMS ON PFAFFLE. FURTHER, THAT IF WARRANTED THE CITY OF i TIGARD UPGRADE THE EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTROLS TO ACCOMODATE CURRENT g t. J _ - - S'3 bk ~ TRAFF 1 C FLOW. l^at v , ~ . r x a Name Address c f 4 k q K dry- 3 WP.,I. ~'Y3 j." 3 /Win o-2a_ ~oe~.wL~r•_ 1'//4(0 Jt{j. a nn rq}s R2 { tT un' P.E ~R i 0,t)- 0 C7 J1 t t4 5 - i/l/Y~iAi ✓iP _ u1~' ieYl2~CJ .LL=Z5 SN-.Yt c/C.1C S Alp- jm./ Jay/ SF C^'^' ~ a@•°c ~ r X75 ~FQfF~f_ s fi F~.. s+ 4< x e r 1 t x' yt ra ' t' opA 3I g -K - x - t ar o- 3 lF, F 'r h - t r d 1,6~ 1 t y k% t q yY ~ t 1r+Y } ~ h- t :f A . r r t ~ is e „ r THE UNDERSIGNED REQUEST A REVOCATION OF THE VARIANCE APPROVAL GIVEN BY I $I$$ T, THE CITY OF TIGARD TO ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD. FOR A SINGLE ACCESS AT 4 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE KNOWN AS CARRIAGE HOUSE APARTMENTS ON S.W. ? PFAFFLE UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT A REVIE`:! MAY BE MADE OF THE CURRENT I TRAFFIC PROBLEMS ON PFAFFLE. FURTHER, THAT, IF WARRANTED, THE CITY OF TIGARD UPGRADE THE EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTROLS TO ACCOMODATE CURRENT TRAFFIC FLOW. _ 'l. J { Name Address j I ,GQ•"~ T ~ ,41 Ma 4 o s. r/ g/ j cJ[,r/ 6 / ~C! Vf d t ` f h 'irv. LiY-Y1, j e 11(29 SLJ ~T~~,~?)ys t i _ 7, '1~ _JS l Z/7 ~!_1 y[+ye..+c~ _ S.;rte f - - n'~"" ~ 1 K~ 92/6 -1 Ali 6 sz" 11 (20 SKJ 19,4 2 1og9v Sw 79'`x. Ud~iy: r L s ~ A kr '.st - C f, - f - t 1 ~j •tT_,1 S-Tl'+!'-"I`~..- IF-'1.. _ iv ~ - i~a 1 v 3~ v i ee r r`,. _'4~ THE UNDERSIGNED REQUEST A REVOCATION OF THE VARIANCE APPROVAL GIVEN BY ~ ~ THE CITY OF TIGARD TO ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD. FORA SINGLE ACCESS AT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE KNOWN AS CARRIAGE HOUSE APARTMENTS ON S.W. y- ST PFAFFLE UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT A REVIEW MAY BE MADE OF THE CURRENT s TRAFFIC PROBLEMS ON PFAFFLE. FURTHER, THAT, IF WARRANTED, THE CITY OF x1• TIGARD UPGRADE THE EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTROLS TO ACCOMODATE CURRENT F, v, TRAFFIC FLOW. r ~ r ar ref 8000 s v- r F4 Fiu- s s k _ - ICYG N811e Address '-J / /JYNf M / may, 4 ~ Qg4 ,f 71 Y, L1 ~ Y f LJ n srJ -s3- 7 KA; ~Z 1Q'3 Q 3 76 S1 Si EUE ST 1 ) f ti rr /V s l l I ) l/`L 1 ,l..l/ ~/Q~ J . (.t~ r •E~'' r?' ` d G~ rVIJ~AJ/~~~ (E F ~ 6 { zt, P C) LA t 3~ Z f • A f y 3 a- a ~~~V - ! 7 c~ lJ J1A~ ~~ry7 YIyk % Ica& ` 1 _ LI__a Sro mow. rd~ s t r rJ k x^r ' I1m U Y`•- (1( -70 Yom/ f r v( Avp, ~ r ` rclw,,. afc 1126 o dn1 S'3.dt /~.rc, e n- c - - - - L d u ~ ' s `itiE UNDERSIGNED REQUEST A REVOCATION OF THE VARIANCE APPROVAL GIVEN BY THE CITY OF TIGARD TO ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD. FOR A SINGLE ACCESS AT " PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE KNOWN AS CARRIAGE HOUSE APARTMENTS ON S.W. PFAFFLE UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT A REVIEW MAY BE MADE OF THE CURRENT 14 TRAFFIC PROBLEMS ON PFAFFLE. FURTHER, THAT, IF WARRANTED, THE CITY OF r TI(_ARn UPMPAW: T..C rv,lcr l::.~. TRAFFIC CONTROLS TO ACCOMODATE CURRENT TRAFFIC FLOW. r ~Address /J Nam ll ~ 79 2/1: 22 t 51 > AJ x. ,scft~ MS- 61d. 7)VAJVAj *7- 7146W Oft Ave iLlei l~~fi5 5 1 ~~DO 7r/ ✓a d ?r amel limo So~q~ ~ TQard~ 4 } - 1 X11 Sv,~ vA 11 - - o ~ t ~ _ f y 0 V f~ Y f 4kS /10,30 -4. 7 Tlf L 747 j l f . F 1; ZIAA-) 7q V5 . . a Y ISI~r'S t-t QnLI~, ~ ~ V lus~c(., 6~ s/ls 19 4 w tR(,IREbrf~ Proclaiming Our ;T Ua 75th Anniversary 4 1 L Jr *.7s - -•r ,i VEA RS aF tii~ Millie Humphrey, immediate past president of the South Chapter 1795 (Tulatin Valley, Oregon) President Orval Bru- Dakota federation, an Spearfish Mayor Fred Romkema ton and Federation Convention Chairman Marvin pose wi'.' ..e p wmor..... - `a"'a.u.-WE,_ _ Crfx..n proudly display the pree!ame_I_n ppted by TIPrd - anniversary.• Mayor Jim Nicolas. ' r ON, hw a. a, z - r ~'r.r~ "f`, tit • r~ ~.arR.. i:# 179 t 7 r 3 _ _ _ py-, C - AU1710Il IZX1.10N 1 -d A- the (mind s1.1- (Iffier of I....on.... \Lumgenu•nLto m:.Ar appmprinte drdurtion. from nn ummity payment., not to rxrrrd uu, " ' ant rrrtfOrd b, the Nati.,-l ..f Rrtirrd Fed-) F..npl I the 14,1- fur eM,-h I II 44ig.t,A. in --r- d---id-1-1i on. 1 n.aAr I'd". .."1 1" 1, the drvindrd .um to the NA-al Ac.urintion of Rrtirrd Frdrral E 1 I IINUII I) 11 mh.. - r'v.tion .hall :d.n apply to aoy aml :dl dup. d- g- rrrtifird hl 1ARFE -ad-hip in n.•eunI.-.. with el..t.n i nwA, 1-1-: ` - 1) 0 You Authorize )slur Spouse's Dues to Be Withheld lbu authorize: ` from Your Annuit r El Yes ❑ No F I 3 Nation:d dup. of C•111 f - ~ - F If lT.ti, enter _our .p une'n name and mentLrr.hip numLer Ldow. plan Chapter darn of n•runl r to Le withheld nn a mon(MY bask. 1.. { Nam Namt.rr i r t _ :,f I un.l.•r.tand that u.i. :.athnrfnd;un hall 1- valid nm.l NAIIFE rrrx h- and pru.x•s. y - t1 n nutiu• of rvwrilatinn in aerunA.nrr with it, ngreer rnt with th.• rlflire of I'rr...nnrl )lan:.xnnrm and that n... di<putrs -g-ling th authnrizwi.- droll Lr a mau.•r L. t V 1111 h ,rod ~ - tl . y.rlL I hold the Offir.•..f I'rnonnrl Vana;;.•nu•m harnd f mnmu. ,dluun.•nt dedurGn 1 I not n, u.i. autl r .awn.. ' _ _ 1 aka nuthurirr the Oflier of K.-, nd %h a;;--a w d : 1,., a n furrtmtiun nn.•..nn to exrrun the rrqu t- k li;;nan.n f \ununant..r nnr. i. A...iWnt _ Unr.pa. ment.:nuI gift.urrnntrilrulio,-1u,NU Wl:an•nut.l.durtildr n•rh:.riteLlr runlriLutiun. f..r frdrrnl inrume la. purpu.r., t ~i h. 38 REnMMEnT LIFE, AUGUST 1996 I d f t(f[[G[[.- - 1 • A Lr ~ Survey nd the Federal Employee p1%. - zl k7777777771 NARFE takes surveys the way t' `°•~f nurses take blood pressure, tempera- - lure and pulse levels to check patients' r i-. vital signs. We want to know how we're doing. Are we fulfilling ours-, members' needs? Are we meeting ±•;~~,...,,•T,-"'"~~ their expectations? Do we even know our members' expectations? To find ~r - out, we lake new member sun cys, At last May's Public Service Recognition Week activities held on the National Mall, i exit surveys and surveys in lna'weer, Recruitment and Retention Coordinator Dina Murray and Denny Parker, former s F - This month. we'll examine new item- national treasurer, distribute NARFE informaiian. - her surveys. In May, our latest new - - r` " y - - mernber survey was sent to 2,000 mem- ment Life vital to staying informed. interesting correlation between com- - bers; over 1,000 responded. For the most more than 605'x, said they will puter ownership and the intention to part, NARFE's newest members told us become active in their chapters. How- become active in chapters. Of all new - theyjoinedafter learning about dteAsso- ever, exit surveys (which we will members expressing an interest in chap- - ciation from either a direct mail cam- address in next month's issue) show ter activities, nearly two-thirds were paign or a friend. This response lets us that only 30% ever become active chap- computer owners. ,i know that new members are receiving- ter participants. The road to somewhere Survey responses-like lab results and reading-NARFE's direct mail or another is paved with good inten- tell us a lot about an organization. These - - U1 materials. It also lets us know that "vet- tions, but intentions do not always surveys have provided us with some - - - }.i 9 Bran" NARFE members are out "heating translate into action, We are no longer a ideas of what's healthy about NARFE. - - l 4i~ the bushes" to attract prospects. In the nation of joiners, so the positive action But we also see symptoms that, left r past year, active memlxn provided over of those who do join is essential. untreated, could injure our productivity 4 .Y 8,000 membership prospects. Many new members are on the lead- and success. All NARFE members are New members told us they consider ing edge of the "baby boom" genera- "Doctors of RecmitmenC By working y 3 legislative issues a primary concern. tion. They are personal computer or together and examining what our mem- The majority of respondents joined Macintosh owners, and 40% of those bers-new, "veteran" and former-tell NARFE for legislative representation who said they own computers have us, we will maintain a vigorous associa- - and information. They regard Refire- access to the Internet. There was an tion. - Request and Authorization for Voluntary Allotment NAR f: Dues ~ ! frown Annuity for Payment of Organization Dues to... Withholding t i Itr war to Jill aw bodr +id,•s ft6i,frrm and rand lo: NUiph:, ~fembrrohip lieronl+Seetion, , _ 1533 New ll:rmpdri, A r. NW, R'a+hington, U.C. 200361279 i - (Please Print) .~i 1 S-ial Srcurih Nun I,- L Chil Service Annuity Number - - (9+ligit number) (hn•ludr prrli\, cSA or CSF) - 1 Olc. Jlr+., 11i++. JI..) , I~-1. lira. \IiJJL• hi iial i Cit., Sul,•, Zip - ' 1 (late of Itwh .,"W[T lL•nihcrhih \umbcr NAM-1: Ch,ym•r \umhcr - _ REnREMENT LIFF, AUGUST 1996 37 - i r?1 i-.~ w-- ; ~ 41, x& ~ , Y st j ''~£a'+'¢"art, xf t - t~ - f r R - - - - 'i - 1 Yy t} '3 t erg, ^~v~- 1rx Est t t r^' Y' Y T ~lsf - t r 4` ~,-skds'F ,Ir, - ~j/ ~ a Qz?r xy 3 EDWARD J. AIETZLER VisIL(J Y~9C~A. `~L r a ~5 km " r`"., a x't ~ x i4`r'~ 0 yr; ; q' ' ~q~~.,a~ ti '11-1-1 N t - a K - ft--1 - ; August 13, 1996_ tom' a } 2~?- a ta, 'K ' Director - `r -'~-xhs # - 1 City of Tigard r 1I-,fq) ~7;g- ~ ~~ch t .•r 13125 SW Hall Boulevard I k rx' - - 4' A r - Tigard, OR s -s tf c' "a x - - 1 _ F -z - - x 1 t - c_ - - Dear Director: v 'fi r sk i;y sf r ; ¢ {',°f`' ~''~,,x,.ro t - 11 This letter represents my formal complaint regarding the final authorized plans for the Foran Subdivision. ' .''r r e' a'"- Several compromises were reached ^ the city council meeting held on September 26, 1995. These ; - } • - r compromises, and the subsequent changes by the developer and Planning og atinn, are listed below: I r_ -17 €I . k i ~r - t i) The Planning sketch of the road proposed shown at the September 26 meeting exhibited a 11 k t marked southerly bend at the West end. This curve does not appear in the appro ed pl_ s. --dam'-I' „ -1 W,-' t - ri s T7ds new aligmnent matetially affects future development plans on my property and is ~a .y ~r- closel y connected to oint number 2. vri 1 7 P r" y 111~ 1, p tr+ tall even ell trees 2) JimeNicoli doer ed Planning tto work to save tthe treeg sAll of th etrees have been Mayor { sfF} develo u*1a - subsequently removed. 1 -1` 3) There were only ten lots in the Planning sketch. Eleven are shown in the approved plans. q ` -t - 4) I was not allowed to voice any of these concerns at the special council meeting held on July g ~ ~ 4' S _ a- 29, 199G.ywL5~.5 k I am requesting this formal hearing per Section 18.24.040 of the city code Sincerely, - N - _ >x -x - ,-a 1, ! r, .1 F Y - 1~ i ? i, w s - I Edward J. Metzler 3 , ,17 " ~ ' +a i s r RwNa,c s r ~~,~,~~--,'Z,~,~Y~i,~~~~,~.'."~-,~tw.,T."~~"~,,,~,~; "Ic.-L tll-~-~-.-,511W %t , i t -trs 11 y - p z, - # of y, 'y~-g + 'x - - r ~ f - ~ r a a J f - -LYE'' - _ f' --`S f '4 - ~Z C .+i rte, r - - f - ~V - J 3(`'4 f { r R c, 17:t - z t y,4 - RSNF ! a 3,+1`t ~3 lT t ,1 13267 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD • TIGARD, OR • 77224 N_-~ ~~4 rs Y,'~ -(3.. `k t T PHONE: 503-624-2124 • FAX: 503-520-6792 _ ''+-^r 'i . ` - a' ti - S ; t .yr e e r t 111,1 C - x-t 4 y , a 4 H rs .1" Y f _ _ -L" _ j( j t •h'14 - - r 3 r$ l k -z '~r !-t' yj}- } t Y 'xa. ~3.sx 11 [F _ i f v r ax Y U 'I", ,-"",-,.",---,,_~-.-.~-,~~.-.,~,t".".,,- ~ ~ " " ; _ s.ax t - ts,z* r - P i 6 t , ,t z' _ F Sq ~F s A-~xJ t ~ F rJ s m~ -",,-t Nap ak d , t-- - t a"-' 1 . . - a - M-M, k 1t A 1 k r _ I a r i,I I y w _ ^ 1.-. L ~v s~ % 1 8' 00 _ - 09/26/95 19; 58 603 684 7'197 C11'1 001 OF 11GARD ~J . c T CAN~ Post-it' Fax Note 7671 Date Q _ Pa6°s► ' e -t` t iL: i • E SerwtT2 1?66.5]N'rMAL wLaJrAa RD W. 9LIS60N 9722a Phona R Photo 39 I TIGAR VD Fa[ n a U (.v a Fax ni 1L ?00, 1. m.. Zk~ 9 ` i~ CFMPl jL z OF *.--7 p}•{ 4:rE II MWMAC.E FASABP" 7kJs. ! vim- I I i 1 i y 3 w i z `w` 'YaI 5f TZO 9F l vi . ' Y:_ ~~L • ' i•,~f(►- ~•~~-t ' LfJ199F L j 3 4 1 ' s is 31 69'- ?9' bl. 1 L r N.I ~4 Y! R\r~~ ,•wW ~G . • .~•.p ~ ..a 4 -.F "t _ f{ 47 '19 701 DuGt7 3= 8<00 5F ~ ~ y ~ ~ 7371 IF :._r• 6777 ,9F 1 t L I I 4L'•' - P .\a Q O .-a r-- rs raer d ~rua+ _ k x r O 1 1 ttarpa r 9 • 6T 1 i 717' b9' - ~;Yii.:;; ' S i33F"Ar E 3'W'F3' - 'E a 1 1L 517L7 e^• ' r Ei~ F`t`7}k •iL-~•, RAaCB TOW CZNVET$7 1 i _ r`. r~rn,52ao ro X taco C. 'J~ r olat~ .403 ~,~'t~~~?~t~+ ~ .,Paw mcw:, _ 7~ 5x70! ~ x rs L-------- J 'J `:E r '-T ^ . ~ :•7~-r•.•-•? `_...®szgs_us+~_. . ':.~,ng• R rf~ - -Z £ fy- f 4 tom. _v t;r v" I: 3 s t i t S ro5~~dr~E' r - - may' F - - rf,i F ` } COMPUTER OPTIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL¢ AUGUST 13,1996 ~GU"Q ` ' u- - a fit' as ' The City Council is budgeted to receive computer equipment during fiscal year 96/97. The t' r - type of equipment selected may vary between council members, based on their specific E, G~~ - sy* r a - ? re quirements. There are three models of computers which are used in the city, each of which Fe y ' have benefits and drawbacks. The three models are (1) a standard desktop as used throughout the city, (2) a laptop with a passive matrix screen, and (3) a laptop with an active xis} K matrix screen. All three models are equivalent incapability. That is, they canall dial into the city network for e-mail, connect to various on-line services such as America Online or ,f ?x r* CompuServe, send or receive faxes, connect directly to the network when in Town Hall, ands' 4 r) r, k } operate Microsoft Office, the same software used in the city network. The differences are - " portability and picture quality. ~r t~ r "t DESKTOP - CALIBER COMPUTER CORP r t + Pentium P133 Processor 3Q §a 16 megabyte RAM % t 810 megabyte hard drive e~ 14" VGA monitor P~7 g r r t 28.8 baud fax/modem x` Ethernet network interface Windows 95a a r~ Cost under $2,000 4rk a}s f Benefits: Low cost per unit, easily repairable, able to swap units in case of problems, large s 3 screen, best picture quality. Drawbacks: Not transportable, it takes up more table top space in the home. Requires r r tz~ i Network Services personnel to travel to council member's home for software installation and s maintenance. Requires uploading, downloading, or floppy disk method for transporting data between home and council meetings. A second computer would be required for use during council meetings, making overall cost higher than a laptop., t WE, ~ Recommended for use when council member has sufficient space in the home to dedicate for , - - a permanent installation and a second computer is available in City Hall for use by each r x r member during council meetings. Council member should be comfortable x u loadin downloadin data between computers and the network or to/ om floppy disks. ' 9 6 ~F3 4 fia F7T T 7` C r, ,4 T.€ - er^T .5 ' ~C> t a^t.-r ay s t3 ,f"' t 1 a t y'k r - - t °tt x .7'N Y 3 /b i"' t Ask S 4 d 1% s tx ` 1- ~ • cw t x b ti z Ga"w„ °R .,f- "1~-Y" `:v'..a.+ M.€_ - ~U~.e - _ -s 3 -'i S 4 _ 5 aT',dr 'f gr_ r"'~ m` `spa.:•:,e:.dsk,:<:s,a«.'s;m:«s^.-:t"aavv-.r.~. _ ^,.ax6,ft i _ 11- fa ' w d bra .7s~,x4 E ' y ~c 3$ - _:s. 4a~t`"G~ .11 , 8 .~i'.i' yr, - t1 ~-e! _~.._;.%{W' " L_ I S r _ 3N's y V5 , E~.s. 'r_~_'` ',y - "'3^c'S2 snS9, t~A 4 F ) LAPTOP -PASSIVE MATRIX SCREEN -MAXTECH X753 _ $ x is _-__tf ~ - - Pentium P 100 Processor t'I - _ fo - ; h d e,7 v Y 16 megabyte RAM ii su e k 810 megabyte hard drive 1"- 0 & " € 4 : 6 a 28.8 baud fax/modem t Ethernet network interface p t '4 sY t' 3 1.44 floppy drive x t' ~ , ? CDROM s: 1 ~a s~ _X - = Audio system ~ ` - r s f t _ TouchPad E M y _ { _ i Battery, charger, carrying case ` s s Windows 95 R : t,t h a'' s Cost - $Z,78O ; £ w "`'zix 4 _ =s y',, Benefits: Portable, takes little or no space in the home, designed to be carried to meetings 4.: rt~ with sel contained soffiv and data, including work done home, car. be carried to City u ` ' y iJ Hall for maintenance or software installation, no secondary computers required in Town Hall, - _ ~ g . r ;an carry i:nit to Council meetings acid connect io network or can dial-in for email. The same Tyt ~ z computer used for council training can go home with the council member. Overall, a laptop X - ~ t `&'f y : t ? z _4_ z is easier to use and less expensive than a desktop. Lowest overall cost. x%t- rX to- ?S-~ r+'°ri t w Drawbacks: Appears more expensive than a desktop on a per unit basis; has a smaller screen i` " z and lower picture quality than either a desktop or the Active Matrix Laptop. h° s t Sr .1 z fat ~s 4 4 4 f - ' f s Recommended for use when space is an issue at home. No uploading or downloading ofdata . , ~W w, is required. Designed for user who prefers to maintain software and data together in one A ~ f r location. User can operate anywhere at any time. Picture quality is sufficient for limited F a f r 11 k ? fi usage- ` t s~~ 41;I1,11-1 , a LAPTOP - ACTIVE MATRIX SCREEN - MAXTECH X753 ;r 2 a i.~ Same as above plus an Active Matrix Screen 4s g w° r Cost - $3,280 t 3 * s ' Benefits: Same as Passive Matrix model exce t for im roved icture uali Hi er cost '?as , ' , j r. P P P 4 ty• FPh 0. s_ w , than Passive Matrix laptop, but still lower than a desktop. t " ' f a- ° `j Drawbacks: Same as Passive Matrix model, except for additional $500 for higher quality 3 i a picture. ' t 11 , -f ,tw. r + t Recommended for use when space is an issue at home. No uploading or downloading of data s ; . ~ 1 r ~ < l is required Designed for user who prefers to maintain software and data together in one ~ , E a 1,1111111 , 25 ~N 3 { f ? 'I location. User can operate anywhere at any lime. Higher qualitypicture is desirable when < ` - - tk r _ usage increases. ,3, ^ r I',~ 11 9.s ` _ y r jj~ 1 ? F ta'v- i s 5h='' u -u _ 'A^w-`' e~ - - e*,s•.. R +c - .+~~e~rz`ga: c ~ ,c -y t 5 y kJ 3 1 F t _ f y J--'f 4 _ - t ?'T` _ n - t _ - - _ - 4 - _ s f- f jj . ~ I ~ U , I'll ~1-11 ~ L ,2•„ j Y ,c~ y_ - KG j f 1 t `7 Y a J' tx~.~, yr-s~. - t, f r z J- 4 r y S~t a k- t y1 4 ,~fi is"MS' a dF ' - - 21, 7FF c t i 3 - ~t ~ a , Aye. S- 9 Y~ 'elm { i ..-c N Y :q E N' I 4 , I ~ 7 , - _ ~ ~ "I - - _ ~ - 6m` r _e , k " ^u'- - i, _ _ :;.a~ a , , N `4`~ *"tw. k a fi 4`- t t is 3 j f 7 - v - 3 a.r w d ,4 a3t e ? r _ s P 'ry. t-t'' - r r k. a a t''.'='-t' di' N4, w. -'t '...s..~,yaw .L,4 24'Ir1_ 'T ~ 3, €`fi k i~t4 S Agenda Item No. 5ess,u+~ I ` ,,.,,a,~e sal a,- - ~ _ ~ {y. z ~a 44n ,4 kit _ t .J k' E P Meeting of t3 13 1Qti ¢ £ *F °3 5 H-'-p '3 ~ a t to x -t~ 3 r ' j , , ,s. ' - h t y'.a v 1 11 `4` x ,1 f Jr ..s. tr_ n fir. ' L Chan-.1 eT t 4 _ ~ 4 ~ f Amend Chapter III, Section 8, so that candidates receiving * s 11~ t, l sx ` r , ` x the highest number of votes during the election for the x ` e~ ti; = ~ office of councilor shall be elected for the o en council R t 1 ~ ~ ' ' 4'r - positions (New language underlined; language to be gs"t- removed is in [brackets]): y a } ° - Section 8. COUNCILORS, (Note: Entire Section to be - . .111;1 " ~ - . s deleted and replacement language inserted) ; - 4i! z _ t r s y = Delete: 4 ~j % ~t 1. -777 ? [The four council positions are hereby designated as vk x k positions number 1, 2, 3 and 4. The councilors shall be ;114Z , Fz~ sw t y elected to hold office for a period of four years; provided, ' # ' 9 Z_ however, the officers holding office at that time of adoption of ' 4 a this amendment shall hold their offices for the balance of the j terms for which they were elected or appointed and until their ; successors are elected and qualified. At each biennial general state election after this amendment takes X` Y ~ , c effect beginning in 1972, two councilmen shall be elected, each for a term of four (4) years. Candidates to fill positions one and two shall be ~h~ ; - _ submitted to the voters in the general election in 1972, and candidates for ~Fya ,t XU' ~s , council positions three and four shall be subject to election in 1974. The candidate receiving the highest number of votes for each of the council " r E u positions shall be deemed elected for afour-year term.] x , f r § _ r r Replacement Language: " - 1 £ y The councilors holding office at the time of adoption of this } a ` a2 ~~s`'s- k r t ° ~pendment shall hold their offices for the balance of the terms for which they were elected or appointed and until their successors are elected and " i, ,1 - Tt lifted. At each general election after this amendment takes effect, two % - ~ 4 Y~ councilors shall be elected for four-year terms with the two candidates "vr , receiving the highest number of votes being elected to office. b R p ir F ; Li n - r ar~,j' t"t {"teI _'a •3s~. 5. - Y ,a J '_N Sa 1 ga } +s ~ r '.I Tr ~x i - + ''d t {FFr -.~~1-11;11 - 4 , ',;4 j~U ~ J~_,__, 'L.'- w~ - , " - c~'- z " ~ ' , " - , A f~' ; ~ S 4- S L C ltf f - Y $ j - `J Ft'7 t f i'C F • r - - - - E t d' ! `W - J - _ x 'r tp J / PP ' 12 - , , - ~ J-1-1 ` _ L I. I F~~ W11 E~ t° z - r 3.« X3x T. Wle.11=16z~~-t g W ~k ay ar_tF..tra.tr.;";4 _"q"-.:h.`• _ , - i~>~"y-'~+;~.?k_ ~•yc, "tiz~.' r Change #2 Add City Manager position and remove the word "his" to make this `x} section gender neutral: r*.- sa r.# _ '.t rya-.7b~~.n.~.r- F _ Amend Chapter III, Section 10. (New languagep underlined language to be removed is in [brackets]): E }t "gyp ~ s= x Section 10. OTHER OFFICERS -qq s r $2 ~t { k Additional officers of the City shall be a city manager, municipalF judge, a recorder, a finance officer, and such other officers as the council heat + + K deems necessary. Each of these officers shall be appointed and may be 4 removed by the mayor with the consent of the council. The council mays` r. _ combine any two or more appointive city ofic:.. . T he - ;l f f s = NO, designate any appointive officers to supervise any other appointive officer OR except the municipal judge in the exercise of [his] judicial functions. x Add Chapter V, Section 20. 4_ e~ • Section 20 A. CITY MANAGER: (1) The city manager shall be the administrative head of the # government of the city. The office of city manager shall filled by i3 ' appointment by the mayor with the consent of the city council. The F manager shall be the chief administrative officer of the city, and as such W shall be chosen solely on the basis of administrative qualifications and experience, without regard to political considerations. Appointment and RM f } removal of the manager by the mayor shall require the prior consent of a t4 a ' I ;i majority of the full council recorded at a public meeting. The city manager ' yt 4 ' shall serve at the pleasure of the mayor and the council, and cause shall not ° r s <d E } be required for termination. 3 F L (2) The manager shall: ; 4 3, (a) Attend all council meetings unless excused by the council or mayor`' , 7 w r jx ~0. C c xe t 3 i ld j Ak21° { F h Y - _ F t ~v'S .C f r7 1 - i-v -fix {!7 y 4 Y .L 4~c 't '7 t o xa ' - r f [ a ie{ rc "'F two s V, ~5 ia,.. E-'` g' 5.6x}.3-Gx -~Fa x alxc _ t{a - -ci`~ 4._.'i 3'- < Yaef`e;e - a M_ "'r wvn= (b) Keep the council advised of the affairs of the needs of r the citi ~ ~Sii~"~{'p, s`•`*~~,.~ tt;s§, ty; Y h 1 - c) See that the provisions of all ordinances are tF administered to the satisfaction of the council; 4 w ~5 f (d) See that all terms of franchises, leases, contracts,r _ permits, and privileges granted by the city are fulfilled; A (e) Appoint, discipline and remove appointive personnel, < except appointees of the mayor or council; WpN a (f) Supervise and control the manager's appointees in their~~ " y service to the city; , ~ mot. (g) Organize and reorganize the departmental structure of city government; F } < 1 t x (h) Prepare and transmit to the council an annual city b_ ud^ce_ t: ca .r-s ~ .K "a T (i) Supervise city contracts; (j) Supervise operation of all city-owned public utilities and k CZ ;s property; and (k) Perform other duties as the council prescribes aF;r consistently with this charter. F NV~ T ? tp`i"L. FR ILA- 46- PZ, -;'v, 1 .f ter f Tfl S :4 T- {~~3 kin Mt C 3 'F. "l. 'i vx~ s - 07 k3 s sY3y - 3 p )73 P~ rac f 'a- 777_7777 77, 777= 777777777777777777777!ny-7~Tpq~ Uk"N' V, 3 # "ham s'" #}}}c`/ s - _ YhY r § ~Z 7,L ,L t e7``L Yt x 4 `"1 f - .29•° - l '1x-'4 1,26 qy F <'r.'~ `~v'"~"a,~•$s z.~~r'L`~ ..s„t fr, r '3--y - _ --»t _ t ~ ~ Y _ J ~ - ,VM,,N,11,,M' - , - zi?sdf w4-7 , -1 I - - , - , , I-, . 11, " I __1 I ~ , , - ~ - _g 1X17f___7%a;`_11_1; 3 , re IN g A # N - m ti - _ z _ t- 1. 3- rot' t rrt Ir -UN, ^x bra f 1d b" z ' 3- x - t ' s - - G sue' , . - s ~ 311 z a i'u s a _ w - f _,.,.a.w_.,.......,s... sA -,~F - .t,,.~ i ME, - k t 8 eY-,a6 -t e - 5x a _Zv m Lti. (w4 sy xa vt - . 1 x i. P; o f sz ' -Y'~+ '~sx > d~.<r...:. l~If-____ .u'f z f' s# t.,nalige ffJ M z a, - ~ ua ~q z * ti i _ ' s #F y I it -1 k~F..' , x - Amend the "Oath of Office" language: , F Yrj. 1F, NI ~ t 1, L., k I'll y ! (The wording, if approved, would be the same as the Oath administered to Oregon ~T I I ,I,Y ' R State Senators and Representatives. [See Oregon Constitution, Article IV, Section 31.]) [r 2y~ 4k u LL Amend Chapter VI Section 30 (Language to be added is underlined and language to be ' - Z11 , 171.1 t- t , ?tom `A':;fis- 3 y~ a, ~ .cy .s - - * , _ p removed is in [brackets]): - Section 30. OATH OF OFFICE.' i f Before entering upon the duties of thf,it [his] office, every [each] a , 4 x officer shall take an oath or shall affirm that thr,y [he] will support the t~-~ r S_. ~vnSitiuiivaii of : t.s:a -a n« ..,~ri nnd F^:th Fall. Lxro~"`-:. ° ' _ ` c - ana ....e ,"~awteS o tco_ ' 'c"' -'a°r'z ' perform the duties of 1h [his] office. [He shall affirm that he is not then n 0__ I UT i4 nor ever has been at any time a member of any organization advocating the u 4 u overthrow of the United States government.]`ra tr , T F' _ $ j f a Proposed New Oath of O/ ce: , b - - - r ' _ ' F OATH OF OFFICE :-'A _ r State of Oregon ) ~ . f j , i ) a B f City of Tigard ) " 11 ~ v 11 -1 e z I, do solemnly swear that I will: t k uphold and support the Constitution and laws of the United States ofX nh= ' t America and the State of Oregon and the Charter and ordinances of the *~1< x ~ 4 ~ City of Tigard. I will faithfully, honestly, and impartially discharge the [s}, r i~~ k F r duties of during my continuance therein to "y , w. ' the best of my ability. f' x ~Y~ ~`Y Y atf f _ fJ' ~,'at - ta'r 4 EE - a rte' r`,~~~ ,I£ zr _ _',3x, .~`a~~'z' FL k £ Y AT}` C~'.lb t~( 1 x > rxa- qtyf - F t / ♦ f -fit `a 5~ r*, ' <~x ' b x -k r^2tf R F r l ,.,e -4 - - t ' 'r Y. r ; _ , , r c -6 C i 5Y~ M r. - . ~ , . , - , ~ Yr- ~r h _ t Yr'~,) ' i M1 `4 € ~i - r ~.00 fig ti 3 h ~ d z c S NIV4 y . Yom`-3~1~~5, ~ _i+• - "'1.re a. Y,~.°' r ' 3 - Change #4 ; Consider removing Section 45 - 49 (Urban Renewal Citizens t s 's~ VM* r ` $ f Right to Vote) of the Miscellaneous Provisions Section of the , Charter. t M a In reviewing the minutes of the last Charter-amendment ! < d;scuss:on it a^neared that Council wanted to propose to voters that this section of the Charter be removed since it was believed 1 that Tax Increment Financing was no longer an option available' T to local governments. However, the City Attorney's officer } aCiJiS2S uiat utiS iS uGi u1V case. `111r"DG a%,%; uaf alla%,UVU s r~~ _ \ ,cr memorandum from Paul Elsner clarifying this issue.) "ate Tax increment financing is still an option for financing urban h renewal efforts by local agencies. Subsequent to adoption of G r "Measure 5," the Supreme Court ruled that revenue bonds issued= um J for urban renewal projects using tax increment financing were notL j exempt from the $15 cap imposed by Article l lb (i.e., Measure 5). Since the City of Tigard remains below the $15 cap, this Y -M financing option would be more readily available to us than those =1 s a~,~ { f > jurisdictions (such as Portland) that are over the ca do Pr - MAI Change #5 y { f ; Amend the Charter to update the general language so that it is ? s r "gender neutral." Attached is the Charter (Language to be h 4 ; - E a added is underlined and language to be removed is in [brackets]). r < { } is\adm\ca{hy\election\chartchg.doc % s s t r' -,'g g e i{ r 3 ,2- 3 FJ- ' _ i 1s G -Em- '1 ! F 7 t: J r y .°r ; N -f tW+1C'`' 4~ - si ~S - - _ z i,~- 1, ;a.S,j.a ;m+..",` g-§3 _ - t-.6 '"a,te `-t'.K` IVRAO, s,~4, ..,$g~?'~- 'rte a_ - j r p q4- , ~ + ,'yam, a, k may. X'y#~, h n Nn - - - - s ;'r3Y, mx"'`":a. ss.'u', sk .c.M.w ''a~jam` 4. - dg.Y.,"' .';L.` ..sus . s h 1 _ _ ~ x } y1 , . ` x t2, , .iR - ODONNELL RRMIS ET AL 503-243-2944 pug 6.96 8:56 No.004 P.02 _ t, - * 1 a ` ['fax ' O'DONN$LL RAMI5 CREW 1' AM ~a CORRICfAN b BACHRACH i s F x r,~ ~ k q x'r -ry ~ f- t' ~...1 ATT'OWNEYa AT3.AW `'•,1- s~a _ a4 s}`~,- y 1727 N.W. Hoyt alreel 4 qtr=-~;.'-r..,y h,r . £.g Purnw,d,Onaon 97209 t - 4 s - TP.LtP3JONE, (ao])f]]-die] .s ° , - i u c:'~ „t r¢, 5 Pwxi (du)i.i-i9.d w ys,- „ ,io p' t DATE: August 5, 1996 y r 5 n ~Lt y ~~Z~t'~ ~t y ' Ip "k TO: William A, Monahan, City Administrator t o ~'t _ ~ Brt - FROM: Paul C. Elsner, City Attorney's Office w - f xn3 ` $ " RE: Urban Renewal Agency t ~ k ` ~ i i, t i t Y @ f `'as . • e•- ' r You recently asked our office for a memorandum to address certain issues involving the interplay , tiskg - r ' _x- between the limitations found in Or. CONST, Art, 116 ■Ae!!ot *:eaura 5`M" 3 It srw' Sections 45 gym" . y "AEi - - tkruugh 5^v cf lisp Tigard %iiy Charier 'rvieasure ii51 j. ~tr=;LL_ As I understand it, there has been some discussion by the City Council concerning the limitations r r 3'- found in Art, 1 tb and s belief held by some that this constitutional provision prohibits the City , , i F from utilizing tax increment financing for urban renewal within the City of Tigard, If that In fact ° F' o { * ' was the case, there was a belief by members of the Council that the continued existence of Tigard q ~Xi , n Q Charter Sections 45 through 51 (which authorize the use of tax increment financing for urban ;y renewal projects) is unnecessary, and should therefore be repealed. } ~ tg c,. F - bpd ' "1J ,P i JJestlnn: Does Article 11b of the Oregon Constitution prohibit the City from utilizing tax 1 L` increment financing as allowed under Sections 45 through SO of the Tigard City Charter? r r I 1'r' 11 _ - 4 Short Answer; No. The Oregon Supreme Court in Portland Development Com'n v ¢mith £ a - - - 11 - hcid Doty that taxes imposed as a result of "tax increment financing" were not a category of tax x f that finds its genesis in a specific constitutional provision; therefore texas resulting therettom fell e ~ _ within the $15.00 cap imposed by Article i lb. The Court did not hold that tax increment . 1 ~ r r' financing was illegal, unconstitutional or limited in any other way.`c~y. ; IM. r k D'ueusalon: As you ]snow, Artiste 1 Ib of the Oregon Constitution does a number of things ' , z t fi relative to the taxing ability of local government and public schools. Generally apcalting it flat P~~11e, 11 ii divides governmental taxing entities into two broad categories: n ' ' f t c r, 1. public schools; and s+ 1 t R cam- dh ( a 2, government operations other than public schools. ~t i•" ` Article I lb then goes onto limit the amount of property tax revenues that can be generated by ~ a • ; i either group such that the total amount of property tax that can be imposed by both is limited to _ - 7 - Tc 't aS'f o*,~ } i F sf r r v-,,,- ds 4 z f x J , -1'1,~~ ~ , ^C _ - - ~fe'Y srw.. ,t:L?^- .Z"+ro;.~ ~.,a' -^'S? "H-~, a ,>w ,e. c~nrt- - •'~s~. „-c 's r ~a-.'rte } y A S } ~ 1 J p { rr a F _ _ _ , f s F `,T_ J Em , - ` , , . ~ _ , " , ~~:r, 'L ~j , rr, ~ " - I . I 2 ~ ~ . , . - . , --.f - - i - - r 5 - Z _ - - - ` `4 - r'-- - - _ , 3 _ I y STX1 €F 1S ag I .1 V 'pt.. -[M- 9 -,S y.. t j _ _ f Q O v ,~''^,"C'r~ - - - s -,s I'+ P - . f.'! N ter. 5er 'r t . s' r~ ~ - ODONNELL kRMIS ET RL 503-243-2944 Rug 6,96 8:56 No .004 P.03 t , `v x c l y -i- 57 Ls ' O'llONNi31,,,RAM16CRRD7~r' i ~ CORRICiAN & BACHRACH n # { t r So`~J Memo re: Urban Renewal Agency 9 'f s Sfr - At~oytC 1996 8 c + - Pa e 2 ~ v - 7 to g s, E Z . s { s St" - 0.'i" fir.-Y Y # , N "Y J)4e i - - t - 9 , k $15.00 per $1000 of the subject's property's real market value $5,00 which can be for public s s gx - schools and $10,00 for governmental operations other than schools. , , -q - - , ' - p , I e1-1 a t q { 5z ' In impressing this tax limitation on schools and other governmental entities, Article ] lb had to f -~W' ' ' -7 r" (and does) define certain relevant forms as well as providing n limited number of exceptions to the - ~ I 11 y. _ 11 - overall properly tax limitation, First, it limits what charges are defined as "taxes" for the purposes f~- 7 _ of the limitation, cat=nd, it aNews- yi tax'e'svut5id' and above the j 17.00"Cap°i if those taxes are k{ t ] imposed to pay principal and interest on @ert,in type: oebonded +,rdebtedn which are aP her. L I r o- is { t Zed 1. authorized by a specific provision ofthe Oregon Constitution; or x5 N ` ~a _ _ k ik° 1 A 2. were a general obligation ofthe issuing governmental entity and which - - f had been authorized had been approved by "...the electors of the issuing of z - 2 governmental unit." - - ~ v In an attempt by the City of Portland to get a declaration by the Tax Court that its Development r Commission's (PDC'e) use oftax increment financing fell outside the pap by being a tax - ,yyh~ I .11 "authorized by a specific provision of the Oregon Constitution' (City of Portland Y. Smith el.aL. £z 314 Or. 176, 838 P.2d 568 (1992)) some confusion has developed over the availability oftax ~ ' increment financing as a means for financing urban renewal by local agencies. r ~ -.v 1 N, ,WAijN -1 . In that case, the Oregon Supreme Court upheld a Tax Court decision which had determined that i ~ 1 4 ; ti tax increment financing was a species of revenue bonds, and as such could not claim to be exempt L"Q1 under the "general obligation bond" exemption noted above at (2); therefore, if wch a device was " - rr hzk M "Mtn `N ~r exem t from the constitutional limitation, it would be because it fell within the class of taxes ` Z P x_`1iZ "authorized by a specific provision ofthe Constitution." 5 , 01 The Court did an extensive analysis of Article 11 b's language and history as well as reviewing the ' - L - terms/history of the constitutional provision which deals with urban renewal Article IX, section -'i*! f~ I c. The Court concluded that Article IX, section Ic did not in and of itself authorize the issuance k 11 s " ` : , of revenue bonds; as such, revenue bonds issued for urban renewal projects using tax increment s "yr t j , - ~ { financing were not exempt fiom the $15.00 cap imposed by Article 116. The Court did not hold ~ , k k in that case (nor parenthetically, in other) that this device was inappropriate. Tax Increment - - - Rt r , t c } "i --~~`r , IN a E Y i ~i i h JY.Y 1 4 " ( r fit. G I y- E- 1" I . r 6- f i LL , F c r7 r < - x r 3 -111-1 ~ t- f - .k - T Y' .J. "A f, h s x a - ri xti -f k- re~L f 1i mR - f - ` E ~ , , I I I- ' , , " - ~f r , , ~ ~ ~ r . - , ! ~ ~ ~ w . . ~ - R r f ±.m 7 . ""-1+......w~... ..-..-..rt--~+..w..m --~-y _ ~r. _ _T c~.~. __y _ ~ "s-VIr- ~n _ 4:x^-'"}'~.'E;~ - - " - - fix - . .4a f - -S, s - ~ t 3 3 - - r r i i - - ,:n 3~ ti -s ,3. 11 IrI'--- ' ? ..h-` t s : r ,s S 4 a-.rr"w"r sx,. s- _ % w~ ttt 'ky-roz. n=fir` `v-.~ Tm - p _ _ -3-. - i. - '':e 'e,d~u' ~W - - 11. ` 1 s' 5W %R,.,. 0 rj' N---3 - - - C' , wa k + - s i?' ,~y'c .,ty 'YZ -S~' s-xx.. I If E +`-'S""2 a~ x42 _ S t^'` z t ,a,. ra,,s, ,r-g'jm. U ~~1 „'=-~5 € [ AI , -!Y _ ; rP1y` x - `p f-. ~j4,~SvC''.y,:; ge i .w"'~4 r1, ` f -s d 1 "S - r; .vim ''s'r. , 11 ~ 5x ~ ~1. a e _ g„ t .ss.- 'K' t _ x r- T _ 'e - a k -n.t S ,y tom,' `s.. a°s ,L ME ~ ,~-.-f'a•t= .v. dcF „ ae:..',.'°.a.:s....,.r3Z.u`.+.,wv. ;kz~.`'i._.c aka '~~'~hz2>t,'•~ua 9 I--- 11 RL 503-243-2944 P.O$€. is. om M. A ate. ~ Ix 0 d _ ~ Y s O'DONNEILL RAMIE CREW ,1 NOM ` CORRIOAN6rBACHRACII n ~ ~ - ~ 27 M, Q ` - ~ - ,4, ~ Memo re: Urban Renewal Agency ! ~I x # R a * , - -~i3 ~ Avguet5,1996 T , k% k 3 Page3 . ~ ~ ! fit t ,,U Fp'~,w3r- ''"4- etag5si'£'~., y." .`I mac: `taw financing remains a viable and available means of financing urban renewal projects, albeit with the ~r 3 , understanding that such taxes are subject to the tax cap'. ' st : Please feel free to contact me ifyou have any other questions. }ra - -a po _ - - lr,tJ900tIhA un.de-.-• - . ~.y1 n•H "z. $,-fix SMITH e f`~i. l~' ax 4~{ 2` . l "L tv ~"rt 1 ~ ~ fi , u e ' gyp' °;~ua~ s r - r c. z ~ - - Q M }a a ` %x _ I _1 -x ti`- hr C k, - F ~c F ~ T~} ~ ~ x E ~ .S + ~y ss~ f. y I1 1 ^ ' - ~ - The fact that Sections 47 and 48 of the Tigard Charter require the electors to vote on 4 -hum , s g -14 L 1, h r _ both the urban renewal plan as well as the financing itself doe not push Tigard'a plan or financing N , - r { $ w { s - s into the second exemption mentioned above. Albeit there is an identical obligation of a vote„~ ' - , - a~ { , l constitutional exemption applies only to general ob ins ion bond% not revenue ones like tax ~ ~~-~,~,5Eti~.~,1,,',,?,~t-~,,,~~---,~.~, ~ ,S~., I ~ ~.,,ttom - y~ g Z - j increment bonds. r` - ~fA n .1 ' - YY~om... g'A 5' x~ .T.~y'- k 'S-3 f ~'r-~4.7 r r7-11; x fir-t' - , Sv en T , S r.. ~u q<~%=5'~ ;a,.~ is 'r.r r,..~. m-a'rs.:- . n mr-a• ON, - < ~SO t Si'as"w ! ~ s- :w' -qx~' , =.S M_' ,f`, ru.M, S' Sri ' ~r t t . "rr+. ,rt t . s- t .x'`" - 7 4 , V, y F , - p, _ ! °e s - s ; " - - " x- 1" . ?'v~y. a s ,i °-Asz, Yob S And i{ - i r - - - A3`s,,' - . t', x k e - t 7 z ✓ ,J,s'NsY~.,r,! Z A p -ram„`; F r,, ' _ a' .'v d rt'.°r~~Z?v`r' ~ ^ L, t a ti s 1 - - f` - 'i H xt tr .,x a4x t y. - .v ~m -i,-~ F a -3s i M -r--li"'.j~"dEr. I" ~,11_211~`~` . , ~ -4-1 " ~ 7~ 1 'I r,5,,., - " - , ~X. ~ ,I-1-1 7 -1 -11 I r t' p` r" t '51T J-4 s t~`:h•r>tyv . .%E" ,'t,"«6' VliF~,. '6~Nn ~'6. :'.~'°";•,,.^s .~.Yt'~ M, :`'t qq I A., '~w,^x 4« °`2` 'r''6'o- ' k a ',r`, .6 f^~ ~ ~ Tx,,,'-n' F S.'.^`•, ^r)v. }1: :k.» .~;'L,.,"'', .x aS_. u. ^z r ''k•,-,3. 'k,... ,'1~' i,i. - - "'SY.',, ~+:'r `'lei ,a•. .i" t . :~ss;:3,•V ~i E„ r~ a ~*;1,'r ' k , .zd i . ,r•r.., +xc!" ».n. ,"5~~. .>r ".g ;razz ~`w s-,y,, n. .:d,Ls, .'%fw, e e .S, ""•x .S. 4..ba y. ,fl•'f .•.:xr, has :ia"xt;.,- .y..a ..,iy. 1 <Yi• t% y.r«,'.'z-->t'u .t, "'i.ix~'»gi .,P"+:• a ,>v°"„u +•«rr r• wr. ,.•^b'1: ,`:p •+.r So `"x R• - ..1-: tti"~ _ 4.. , i^r . , a:.Y tic r. « ~S *'~r „ rr F^ r a ::+^d•` ' 1^u n ,+rt'S "i F, } 16"a MIL RBA's f i .J ~ 3'Y+, f~ ,t} , 6, x 'e:~r., ,x r , N,'''+ .'9. .I ',"Vri. e,& T u3 - ' u}, {,vim ~'tii 'roe ``'.S f h.. ,r=:4t•. b .-l- ~ N.Nm + tin' Kr, ~N 1 a z A, ur= - A ~ Y .5 F '4. N k ik r ;{"r .,,.i3 t 4 $ A'S-}~s •'''^""s 65..'k_,... , i§,, as v• 1 4 9~ t >'r• r3 x ,,i ti e =•x ,r Rpx. fyti« ^ 1 K 7 T :'7 + t ,R, P° S a 55 . 4^ A3 .^r ''r'':^ .1' , 3 •~s.. art r,^l 5v' tt -t > is t" S 4 •,r,<a rY . `'itt'. sr a ' s ~ .=,.a , .i, r, m:~{wdu,,,.'•u:.~;,t, • x= G •.xSW~ 4°: W ;qtr-~,'; "PIK, N' F- 't 4 ok x f y r ':i`;, ! rk,R,tl°~x tll' kl e i`" x + a e 1,.}:SI; ,i+"~ t paji~,¢}"tKxp sZ444 ar~w, u ~ '~'ti -s fra C CD 0 CD Ln ~ O SX- F CD r-L E CD z 1{ x lV k' t 5 M r' ~ ~ r }f a r f _ ti-+ v 4-1 -F i l 1 : Q+ t (D f k- ~ s r ~F 7 c t b C I ,3 `'i h t, n< L E r ) t ? r +n rf _ - ^i r b I ~l c r 7 I r~ ty h+ ~L k' # I vk S' r k r,~rrr e+4)r~`,t~`t~'19: :N p ~.F' tr t i \ }t i S 1 ~S , rif a ...„a-:= v c•r- ,IS.rs ,rs?~. ; ,..,fir+. ,,.'^S'.!E Ncn , rF+.1!,'~AS,~{ C''i'i#~`" t,i ^ _ _ irGr 3:*s'+..t ~F', :Yl: ,.Y 4 G r 1,--, • ;r- c •t +'1 t' 'a a sc'~`"i^`• d x'-.-°, : ~•s n q t q~ ~ ,a y r, v fi F-•, „ ..:f Y:F. r ,',R'.f, Y5'Y w,Y,Y^r"" 2 f 4- _ .,5>;:*, ''r`~i•y.a ~ ,'i q '`fir Ys f' +Ei.Yrr': ''•.%'''t r,. a~"~ .,u~t,,, . 'f `rv>VU •L 4 t : M , kv . k .ray' 'R,*r "t?• -3w ,a.. "i,~rF' t. .,.i~;,.r3 E; ,.3,`*. J+ L r. Y ~r At>~ a ' ,r' ~ I t..r.,'.s f . 4 >a'v g ^v r+a.. r -'E:: ,+t°r"-~., t : a'~~k, ,ig~l,", . -a .y+ 'mot#9•'~ t ~P- rY ~:3 .LT", Y •1 ~.13 'z „d~ ,y: °.§l.Th Tr ,«2j jr „xw,.(.~ - :F `4t « F 3 M'S d'i~ „ . .:^ib~ ~ 3.' ~ R . ~../6•ir ~ d - . }4'?' JhiYi r« - ~ ~~"ya nh. nr:•'~' ~,a fl-. x,t •,t.^ a~. , € Sul n .r~ ,n -S C '="A r Y uS 'n»` ,.,.A. .'Yi Y, : ' +•"a'~„ y - Y " wh. X'E'r.G - t t' ,k ~,rv. , `Aar? } g'-mg 4ek ~ •=Wd g k`y.?u } g ~,u .ti,',•-, , s`0. t A$ - r k L k'r+sv 1t .d S ."p' C 'fr 4, ee !1'' „R 5, r•;kf„ Yi~u t4r J ~s ~ 3 55 'd ,.di'}`Hr f. k' 't' °!ir' a" , Y`:x ;,7"' e'''1~•'a' , `4t, f ^e'r, r, t„ ,i.'p r" ,r. av .,flu, a., ~~r Y~g~+ k' `w ~e.,a .,n i `t S}^, ^>~t1 - :'f•,.+:" fib°" Y:;. .4 d~`'b'nf. - +t ' :'3~ ~ h Y`S4 ^k+ t Jrr-, x R Sj', v4~• ~ 'xr F Ullf' a , .;a a, s^ `.~.>•.r ' ~ d, W r..z, t'a ~t`< -:-r,.. _y Y S~'. a. ~ ''~4- SF~~}t~~ ,~r .d-. . ~+?e • d -s t, . : it~F'"' .>sa4 . i,$, a, +'fS 7x . a `.n,a t•`'.~. glr.~i ,rrb,<t Yr-+' irk~`y,. -,.'"tc •,r,.. .'}i ^-:+~tu's•. , t• ,.3. .d ~ k~'.=' g t, .L s `Y:t '15'~ :Y ~q .i~ ~ ~ . al ~ `s 4 . r Y"'a : k ;Y; ".J' a3. t' ,rt :*.¢r"-,.a -.i-,. .y. .•.,~a,,'Y"7'a. _p,,~tmnMr. ~rr"r>~..•aJ~'vw..,G.m ~K~~ .~i. .~~~~~'~rr'~'.'''~~m - .f ~~u'•,~3 ;;n: o-:.,~aV"':+~`~",v., y3$:g A.~, "~P•"•r.•:r,r: a.,„ ae -1; „,;"rig` . a h. ~ +~~u,'~,,,r ;w3;!,~. ~k~'~,k . c-, v wv+N .r>. ~~,~.,p.1 ,`~,r o ~'~I~"><.. C rF~ rµ ^'TT" 1 ~ ,i'^•x ~c-.f ~.~,r7 - .jv .a~ F ,r C 1 1 Y 6 1 4} v._• Sri,._, ~~r _r..,!_._ _ _ r.!'.I. .~s.w i;~rr±,..yl,~.~.1' f„y ,Yi ~.ht.~ a w:.~l.i-. r , .....1 +s,..,ix . a : , , i _ _ _ fti +L rat - - r - x < t - a..+" , sy - s 4 s jC- ~^'p, k"1 i t x, r . t,a-`~ tvtz,{ zs ~'`4 q d F . z 'x` xY _ % 4 , V a TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE , CITY CHARTER MAYOR-COUNCIL FORM , ; 'j Chapter II 1 CHARTER of the CITY OF TIGARD POWERS t a t - } OREGON , ' - - , x dr t Referred to the voters and adopted November Section 4. POWERS OF THE CITY. «s 6, 1962 (Amendments through May 17, 1994 + Election) The City shall have all powers which the E Effective January I 1963 constitutions statutes and common law of the t`'''a f n= r = z4 " j ~.s ' - ` United States and of this State expressly or ' ; ~ } ` Chapter., impliedly grant or allow municipalities as ally 1 [ 7~~ NAME AND BOUNDARIES I as though this charter specifically enumerated , a I'll each of those powers. m tea , , , 59 'n i V , , Section I. TITLE OF ENACTMENT. W I _1W Section 5. CONSTRUCTION OF " sr 4 This enactment may be referred to as the CHARTER sp _ --a M, . A City of Tigard Charter of 1962. z, - ; ~ 3 J In this charter no mention of a particular Section 2. NAME OF CITY. power shall be construed to be exclusive or to "I 11 restrict the scope of the powers which the City z~ # -'`z The municipality of Tigard, Washington would have if the particular power were not f County, Oregon, shall continue to be a mentioned. The charter shall be liberally ! ; i municipal corporation with the name "City of construed to the end that the City may have all 3 J Tigard". powers necessary or convenient for the conduct ' ~ ~W r of its municipal affairs, including all powers ' , s-= I V, t Section 3. BOUNDARIES. that cities may assume pursuant to state laws § ' v and to the municipal home rule provisions of r } } The City shall include all territory the state constitution. encompassed by its boundaries as they now ~ . ` # exist or hereafter are modified by voters, by the Chapter III council, or by any other agency with legal FORM OF GOVERNMENT ~ ~ j power to modify them. The recorder shall keep ; ! t III his office] at the city hall at least Section 6. WHERE POWERS VESTED.;; two copies of this charter in each of which r ; ` q Except as this charter provides otherwise, 3r 3 - J [he] the recorder shall maintain an accurate, all powers of the City shall be vested in the { t~ R l up-to-date description of the boundaries. The council f - copies and descriptions shall be available for j public inspection at any time during regular Section 7. MAYOR AND COUNCIL. r , office hours of the recorder. r' ` ! Y F 1 art - l C-1 Reformatted 1994 - > 5 C _ -x - - ~ c t +"F-s F a :r v i x a i 14 -i _ C': S f -i 1(e F . A , - - , L { ^s. ,f - 1 1 ua t t bfi i _ GJrr9 r - 1 ( ' a~ I r r ` - - _ 3 i 7, _ h- E - - - s 2A, $7 ~ ~ "'~i, Z~~_ - - . ~ ~ S i` Yii- 9 Y _ - _ -`1A - - - j { ESL Ct- - -pp- .....t_..w.~..r..~_.......--..,m. ukY 4E.L.suw'xas. .v-wsuR •.eu.._.._....__.-_ . : ___a... rte'( P -es;-y','i•:-G~~y 1 ;5H1 4t_:. _ _ - _ is _ - 3 6 , ` i TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE z The elective officers of the city shall be a election laws. The council may appoint a _ r 3 mayor and four councilors who together shall person to fill a vacancy until an election can be y - k constitute the City Council. At the general held. (Res. 93-63, May 17, 1994 election: ; _ election held in 1990, and every fourth year Measure 34-6, May 15, 1990 election: Measure ? 1 w ° ' thereafter, a mayor shall be elected for a term 51, November 4, 1986 election: Measure 51, k , of four years. No councilor shall serve the city November 5, 1985 election: Measure 53, y as councilor for more than eight consecutive November 2, 1982 election: Measure 53, May i r P t k s years, nor shall the mayor serve as mayor for 18, 1982 election). r ';It" _ ? more than eight consecutive years. In no case { v,_a~_~ - r - ' shall any person serve on the City Council for Section 8. COUNCILORS. - 'r 1' '''t* x _ y - more than twelve consecutive years. These ; - x , limitations do riot apply to the filling of an r rr><. r F - I l lie u av, cou.nen posinonS - unexpired term. M are hereby designated as . jtl~~ r . No person who is serving as mayor or positions number 1, 2, 3 and councilor shall become a candidate for any city ! office for a term which would be concurrent 4. The councilors shall be z 1 with the term in office then held unless that elected to hold office fora . ~ - person first submits a written resignation from K the then current office at the time of filing for period of four years; t~ " f µ r the other office. A resignation submitted to E 3 z t ` 5 ~ i satisfy this section shall not be withdrawn. A provided, however, the F_ u. • i resignation shall be adequate for purposes of officers holding office at that this section if it provides for the termination of ` r 10M. I time of adoption of this „t~ ~ the signer's service in the office not later than st the last day before service would begin in the amendment shall hold their ;;-I e h ~ { 9 office for which that person seeks to become a offices for the balance of the 1 t w "k candidate. - W " ~ t r A' : 1. E terms for which they were fi In the event the office of mayor or elected or appointed and x f { h ~1 , councilor becomes vacant before the normal r ~ a Y expiration of its term a special election shall be until their successors are t " , 9 held at the next available date to fill the office elected and qualified. t- r f~ f, ` for the unexpired term. Such an election shall only take place if the council can schedule and ; hold a special election at least twelve months At each biennial general 3 c before the term would otherwise expire. If an a election is held, it shall be held in accordance state election after this :r, r e x j with the election laws of the state of Oregon amendment takes effect * x ' and city ordinances not inconsistent with such y' r' r ` Ft ~4 1 1 T - ✓v,. , ~ , '-i, ; , ' ~ul~ I . ~,~~~-~~-~l""7~,'~,,~,",,*;-.7~ir,-',",,,'~~', ' _f'.7 ~ 7, C-2 Reformatted 1994 ` . , ' A f 5 ~wa,.r. f 1 } 1. r - - - - I c` x.kFk. } F _ - -x+ - - ..J I - - - - - - F i I - _ a YI ! s __v_s:_. .._.t._...._ ..r__;-_ _ 1 A U 1 T ` ~.,.._..iu..=a.-._:.::....ae' -;-m.e....-.. - mss.. M""-.-GP Pja ~~fi~ C~ z a f E r wt` TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE 07 Ts s. t. 4 1$ S, beginning in 1972, two this amendment takes effect, k E at councilmen shall be elected, two councilors shall be each for a term of four (4) elected for four-year terms, 1 a years. Candidates to fill with the two candidates kr x; ' r y x' -Y positions one and two shall receiving the highest =c 1 ri he S»hmitted to *hn i~nfnro 1. 1= _ ~aa.. •v~a.ao iia nui fiber of 1 votes being the general election in 1972, elected to office. and candidates 4.'---. a = - u council positions three and four shall Yz Section 9. be subject to election in 1974. hJ mss` r Repealed by Ordinance 72-16, Section 9,; y The candidate receiving the rr~~ May 23,1972 election. highest number of votes for;,=4= Section 10. ()1 t1EK OFFICERS. each F 3 v of the council positions shall be deemed elected for a Additional officers of the City shall be a four-year term. j Qklleasure 0-113 IPanager. municipal judge, a m h x y <1 53 November 2 1982 recorder, a finance officer, and such other w3 > > officers as the council deems necessary. Each f _ } of these officers shall be appointed and may be removed by the mayor with the consent of the The COnneilnre holding council. The council may combine any two or sew more appointive city offices. The council may office-at_the-time of adoption designate any appointive officers to supervise , - - ~ s a, r any other appointive officer except the of this amendment shall hold r s~P r municipal judge in the exercise of [his] , their offices-for t the balance judicial functions. (Measure 52, November 5, 'RMO of the term, for which they 1985 election). i were elected or t l appointed Section 11. SALARIES. d, a ~r r; { and until their-successors The compensation for the services of each are elected and ualified At z j ~ city officer and employees shall be the amount ' each general election after fixed by the council. - r - ! ~ • ' „ r r r ~ 1 771 C-3 Reformatted 1994 { i rE , ~ Cf r [p[E 4 - ? R C 'na.._.E,~ g' M I z z [I } TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE t nv ly r Section 12. QUALIFICATIONS OF Special meetings of the Council may also X vR fl ^u r r_ ~ OFFICERS. be held at anytime by the common consent of 4 all members of the Council or by the delivery i A qualified elector within the of a request for a special meeting, signed by a meaning of the State Constitution, who will majority of Council members, and delivered to F -1 r x r 2 1 have resided continuously for a period of the City Recorder and to remaining Council t F t u twelve (12) months or more immediately members and the Mayor, if they are then in the ,F ' gJ preceding the election in an area which is City. All meetings of the City Council shall within the corporate boundaries of the City as conform to notice requirements consistent with the same shall exist as of a date one hundred state law. ensure 53, November 5, 1985ry (Mx € fi twenty (120) calendar days immediately prior election: Measure 59, May 18, 1982 election).` t},at M, ~ to the date of the election (inclusive of all r territory previously effectively annexed to the Section 14. QUORUM.'- ¢x , fr City), shall be eligible for an elective office of X7 _ the City. The Council shall be final judge of A majority of members of the council shall J R" the qualifications and election of its own constitute a quorum for its business, but a W E x, members, subject, however, to review by a smaller number may meet and compel the court of competent Jurisdiction.~ attendance of absent members in a manner provided by ordinance. E z Chapter IV Wal; Section 15. JOURNAL. - COUNCIL r4~f~kr}I € The Council shall cause a journal of its { } t _ r Section 13. MEETINGS. proceedings to be kept. Upon the request of 1 x « i r 'sue f The Council shall hold a regular meeting any of its members the ayes and nays upon any t g question before it shall be taken, and a records a at least once each month in the City at a time of the vote entered in the journal., r f - and at a place winch it designates. It shall r" 1 adopt rules for government of its members and -x a,~a f, 4, r proceedings. The Mayor upon his or her owna h -p F a motion may, or at the request of Lhree members Section 16. PROCEEDINGS TO BE YF of the Council shall, by giving notice thereof to PUBLIC. all members of the Council then in the City, ,y ,x 9 call a special meeting of the Council. In the x No action by the council shall have legal x ;y xt y I event of the physical absence of the Mayor effect unless the motion for the action by the r r from the City, the Council President shall be council vote by which it is disposed of takes empowered to call special Council meetings in place at proceedings open to the public.f the same manner as the Mayor may call such r I meetings. Section 17. MAYORS FUNCTIONS AT i 34- ~ l COUNCIL MEETINGS. * - 1 C-4 Reformatted 1994 5`' c r ~ -JF - - "r d y+. - et £ nC { 77 e'; z 1!~ A3' u C . r s - _ - - s ~ _ t S I ` J s 4 ~ 77 3 _ i~v} bv i i' .._e ..~,...e__..._.v _.e~._........s..as.l.'.:.f.....:..;,~w.<.a.s.. rw..>s.-.... _ -,u'4"2_' y - ..,,,6666 - Z S S S A~ YJ - TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE proceedings of the Council and countersign all The mayor shall be [chairman] I orders on the treasury. The Mayor shall have r no veto power and shall authenticate by 91air of >e council and preside r ;ts signature all ordinances passed by the Council` deliberations. [He] The Mayor after being enacted. After the Council - + shall have a vote on all questions brought approves a bond of a City Officer or a bond for i rt ` before the council. a license, contract, or proposal, the Mayor shall ' authenticate the bond by endorsement thereon. Section 18. PRESIDENT OF THE (Measure 55, November 5, 1985 election). ; - COUNCIL. ' s SPrtinn 70A CITY At its first meeting of each odd-numbered a r .ter . r, Ay1Ht~IH .n iC - r ' year, the council by ballot shat! choose a ,LL,, ~ ~ _ r president from its membership. In the mayors absence from a council meeting the president (1)The city manager shallA~ shall perform the duties of the office of mayor { V and preside over it. Whenever the mayor is be the administrative heart y `X physically or mentally unable to perform the of the government of th P functions of office, the president shall act as the } c r L.J mayor pro tem. (Measure 54, May 18, 1982 qty. The office of city ? 4J election). , manager shall filled by ' f Section 19. VOTE REQUIRED. appointment by the mav~l'; z ar With the consent of the city Except as this Charter otherwise provides, ~-o the concurrence ofa majority ofthe members council, The ma ag r hi I ~ of the Council present and voting, when a v _ chief administrative quorum of the Council is present, at a Council uethe meeting shall be necessary to decide any officer of the city, and question before the Council. (Measure 54, ` , Such shall be chosen enlaly w k~ k t November 5, 1985 election). on the basis of ! Chapter V 3 r x i{ ' r POWERS AND DUTIES OF OFFICERS administrative ALalifeationc and experience, without Section 20. MAYOR regard to political F The Mayor shall appoint the committees collCideration { provided by the rules ofthe Council. The Appointment and removal of is Mayor shall sign all approved records of F C-5 Reformatted 1994 (I 5 r r x' a RO, ~ a i % a t ~-n ry ai E ~1 - J =MEN _a~ 2 - - t x' t - - - - - A _ 4 .t y TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE ` u the managerer by the mayor privileges granted by ' shall require the prior the ci are fulfilled; x ® ,F consent of a majority of the (e)Appoint, discipline full council recorded at a and remove appointive public meeting, The city personnel, extent sy _ - manager shall serve at the appointees of the mayor pleasure of the mayor and or council; .4 3 the council, and cause shall (f) Supervise and = not be required for control the manager's p'h x ! termination. appointees in their service to the city; f (2)The manager shall: ()Organize and K (a)Attend all council reorganize the meetings unless excused departmental -structure by the council or mayor of city government; { (b) Keep the council (h) Prepare and 4~}1 ; r r ! advised of the affairs of transmit to the council the needs of the city_ ; an annual city budget•f A' (c) See that the (i) Supervise city' a provisions of all contracts•t k ordinances are ( i) Supervise operation administered to the of all city-owned public + satisfaction of the utilities and proper un • " (d) See that all terms (k) Perform other s y of franchises, lees, duties as the council r`. ! contracts, permits and .r/ C-6 k j Reformatted 1994 w J rI _ - , s.- - - - - - - . - - - - - 2 „ _ , M - Y- - 7.'~ , - , , I , - - , , ~ t-~'~,f~~,':~ ~--,`~,,~--T '~'~,~~z,,--".".---~-', -.4-. ~1'? sa," R", }3 h hit - i - } st - L# k-~ g- - m ! x s „t.`Yc%4.r' 4-1S~~F-r r.,,, P ~ §xE a1 _ _ ma'r' -r TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE - - ,,-4~ F , . i shall be entitled to a trial bYj~Y as provided by F~ 'r a d - , } prescribes consistently state statutes. (Measure 55, May 18, 1982 ( with this charter, election). ~ -j` F-.. _ s 5 Section 22. RECORDER. : f -2. ¢ ~ # - Section 21. MUNICIPAL JUDGE. G- - tll- r, T,:h-£ 11i,' The Recorder shall serve ex officio as ti> r ~ , clerk of the Council, attend all its meetings r a t The municipal judge shall be the judicial unless excused therefrom by the Council keep t i a } 7 1 7.1 .1 ti officer of the City. The judge shall hold within ,F') O5 ~K-- w _ the City a court known as the Municipal Court an accurate record of its proceedings in a book. rg 3 - provided for that purpose, and be the City's s" c t for the City of Tigard, Washington County, election officer. In the Recorder's absence 3 ; « 0-es-On. ThC CGur~i shall be open for the 1 - from a Council mecting, tie mayor sun„ rs.._ transaction of judicial business at times appoint a clerk of the Council pro tem who, 1 specified by the municipal judge. All areas- r ' } F within the City shall be within the territorial while acting in that capacity, shall have all the- - k jurisdiction of the court. The municipal judge authority and duties of the Recorder. (Measure a nab'"` 52, November 5, 1985 election). ~N shall exercise original and exclusive 3 { 11 t t " 1 ' L ~x jurisdiction of all crimes and offenses defined - Section 22A. FINANCE OFFICER. , l" go- and made punishable by ordinances of the City a ~ j , - t 4 - , and of all actions brought to .ecover or enforce l rig x ~ - 4 The Finance Officer shall be responsible V x forfeitures or penalties defined or authorized by F c. ordinances of the City or as otherwise provided for the administration of the City's fiscal ~ { s R functions and shall sign all orders on the >1 4, - g 1 by state law. The judge shall have authority to s n treasury. (Measure 52, November 5, 1985 # issue process for the arrest of any person ~t; t I ~ accused of an offense against the ordinances of election), ~ the City, to commit any such person to jail or w,4 er V x Chapter VI r admit him or her to bail pending trial, to issue , T,, t ~I t subpoenas, to compel witnesses to appear and ELECTIONS ~ $3~ ] r him, testify in court on the trial of any cause before Section 23. ELECTIONS. 5 m, to compel obedience to such subpoenas, r~r~ 5 to issue and process documents necessary to ` r 1 Except as this Charter provides otherwise, ~ -r carry into effect the judgments of the court and t and the Council provides otherwise by order, ' A - to punish witnesses and others for contempt of t~, the general laws of the State of Oregon shall r x , F the court. When not governed by ordinances or <r V apply to City elections. Measure 56, s~ `a this charter, all proceedings in the municipal November 5, 1985 election). F y , , } 4r court for the violation of a city ordinance shall € f - F be governed by the applicable general laws of ` the state governing justices of the peace and Section 24. d , justice courts. Defendants in the municipal r- w ' A court charged with violation of city ordinances Y r E 7 , - r-'. n C Reformatted 1994 1, 'n r { - ~ .St 7-:4,7.P 4 .f #p - - - -.-2 __I y rs v F { Tr " , t f T ry." 4 ' A d ~ , L2 ~ . _ ~ . ~ . ~ , . f _ r -;~~!~W,,~' -,~,'11~-.!'~'-'-~I`- L ' L ' , ~ . ~ . J, } _ _ ,J i^l'k ~{i - x p r stir y k t _ ~`b _ ' z k Y -rc t - d - K $'t rrg ) t & +J t. p I 2 , - - - . . . - , ~ - ,Z~ " i y 'S . - X _ _ - x I _ - c -,,.8 tel. Y i 3 - - F,---- ,,.t _ r _ rt"3q~ _ - c 4 , 1-r y, - 1f F s B -Ada r , ""x cc r z k sS j^ aces-sm.. _...-,.I~s. 3~ ..v.....,._.__.___.._........._ _ ~_.......-_..Y _ _ G`` t~ y 2 M g r , r fF- t q G e5 - y ' - I'IGARD MUNICIPAL CODE a ' k x} _ i ' Repealed by Measure No. 56, November h, [he] will support the constitutions f t t se S, 1985 election. t s and laws of the United States and of Oregon 1 t c- ` sj Section 25. and faithfully perform the duties of their cyY { - r - - ~t x r [ ] [He shall affirm r Y hIS office. ~,r Repealed by Measure No. 56, November that he is not then nor ever ' 11 ~ z f t~ , ~`r ' 1 S, 1985 election. Y , ~ & has been at any time a ; . ,i- 3 r `t ~ Section Lb. t.....,f a F z F~ -,M " - ' . nv organization Illeliluca of - ✓ '3 a r rrrt--a Repealed by Measure No. 56, November advocating the overthrow of z 3 , z 5, 1985 election. i ~n the United States n Scct:on 27. e-government.] rA`. Repealed by Measure No. 56, November 3~ ~ } e' Section 31. NOMINATIONS. ' 5, 1985 election. r '+K' 0~ W -11 . A qualified elector within the meaning of _ . ~ ~ a -111-1- I ` Section 28. TIE VOTES. the State Constitution, who will have resided - K ~R~ f T 3 continuously for a period of twelve (12) 1~ I ; J In the event of a tie vote for candidates for months or more immediately preceding the > , ; , ' - ' t ax an elective office, the successful candidate election in any area which is within the t .r '-'Mm ~f h shall be determined by a public drawing of lots corporate boundaries of the City as the same ~t J~ in amanner prescribed by the council. shall exist as of a date one hundred twenty -if-' r K (120) calendar days immediately prior to the E, 1 Section 29. COMMENCEMENT OF date of the election, (inclusive of all territory 0 IF 'Z TERMS OF OFFICE. previously effectively annexed to the City), r r - ^ The term of office of a person elected at a maybe nominated for an elective City position. 7 ~ ` i regular city election shall commence the first of x x ' The procedures for nomination and ' r I 1 . the year immediately following the election. < - - election for elective City positions shall be r w~ x governed by the election laws of the State of e o- d Gregon, or by City ordinances if such g r ordinances are not inconsistent with state law. I , € ` (Measure 56, May 18, 1982 election). -r y r, t F Section 30, OATH OF OFFICE. , _ w Chapter VII ` ° 3 Before entering upon the duties of h g a VACANCIES IN OFFICE ~ L their [his] office, every [each] x d officer shall take an oath or shall affirm that 3 , "r ; ~ nth top -fir - f , p - rV t- C-8 Reformatted 1994 _~'t A'%A x `'i 1s r s 1 n 1 " 2 1, Nh 3 k ti f 4'~4k ty J 11 a 3 } b i > - 2 _ d Y { ~F _ k rt t" f .r#k " - F_ y - k t #F k '-7N-'L'.' _ ~ry X F5 € 1 ~T j -1111, L } ~r teas •®L M E,~~"^` mot "--s 1 t t Y C Y 1 - I t k' _ _ as : _ is ,11 - a' ~ ~ „ 4 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE T Yl , 'y Y F Y . 4 t,G - _y . ? Section 32. WHAT CREATES passage, be read fully and distinctly once in K v r 112 i r y = VACANCY, open council meeting. w- w An office shall be deemed vacant upon the (2) Any reading may be by title only (a) if W r.r.' incumbent's death, adjudicated incompetence, no council member present at the meeting conviction of a felony, other offense pertaining requests to have the ordinance read in full or f - x P" k,- ~ to his or her office, or unlawful destruction of (b) if a copy of the ordinance is posted in at ~ u a ~ _s> K 11, _ 54Z. , _ public records, resignation, recall from office; least three public places within the city limits - orceasing to possess the qualifications for the before it becomes law. (Measure 57, - _ y : office; upon the failure of the person elected or November 5, 1985 election). .d. appointed to the office to qualify therefor} within ten days aver iLc time r his te.^ of (3) Repealed by Measure No. 57, - ` , - ` - --t!r 1i I - - , , I a ti office to commence; or in the case of a mayor November 5, 1985 election. T or [councilman] councilor, upon r - , - - . 11 "4 (4) Upon'u`ie friaf vote on an ordinance, =W 0M.7117-MI, F his ff her absence from the city for 30 days the ayes and nays of the members shall be f without the consent of the council or upon his taken and recorded in the journal. ~ , r 4 F s ti mks oLher absence from regular meetings of the P e r~ , 11 V, council and upon a declaration by the council (5) Upon the enactment of an ordinance £ xf t ' of the vacancy. the recorder shall sign it with the date of its K,t~ k . - 0 passage and the recorder's name and title of ~x~~ r K a§ Section 33. office, and the mayor shall sign it with the date ?}-'xy ;55 ~ f nr of signature, and the name and title of office of ;4v I) ,-N` t I -1 Repealed by Measure 57, May 18, 1982 the mayor. (Measure 55, November 5, 1985 t -"j 4",;,E R V{ , election- election; Measure 54, November 2, 1982 z 1! f election). $ 41 Chapter VIII ~ f ORDINANCES Section 36. WHEN ORDINANCES TAKE EFFECT. ' ' 1, b E' Section 34. ENACTING CLAUSE. An ordinance enacted by the council shall " tZ is E _ The enacting clause of all ordinances take effect on the thirtieth day after its Ni! hereafter shall be, "The City of Tigard ordains enactment. When the council deems it m I i t f --7 as follows: advisable, however, an ordinance may provide i - ~ttt. , T T ' - a later time for it to take effect. In case of ~ F ` Section 35. MODE OF ENACTMENT. emergency, an ordinance may take effect S N c 1 s ) r immediately, provided that there is set forth in S (1) Except as paragraph (2) of this section a separate section the reasons why it must t f provides to the contrary, every ordinance of the become effective immediately. a r , r # council shall, before being put upon its final - t 61 ~ t i yr} ' V C-9 Reformatted 1994 ; r f ; ,c.~ ` t - i` ,r - ,i t k~sy w -u Y a' " t _ t L[F -c. 'cr a L. `I x _ _ - it ESC r- ~t r 11.1 1~1:11 -I ~,zz-- _ , , ~ _ , I ~ I - . ~ , , , A , " hx.. - - - t [ ti - r - - - 's - t a j l 1 - - - - - - , , - - ~ I - I , - 7r , 4", , - - t j.. 1 _ > c ! r ,7 i`-S 3 ''r a. ; 4 E t~,_ J ^ _ - - PP El ~ ~ I ~ . I 11~ ~ , , ~ . I I - ~ ~ ~ : " ~ I. - " : - ~F , I ~ I . I . r , : . - , 'A. , - - ~ - ~1 - t . I r , - ~ - : t , , I. - 1 1 - _ `..'r'te^If - -S'i T , , h .,~,F . . - - - b W X ; Vl~ Pgp,`;~,,~~.l , ~ , , -1 ~ I - - - .,~g ~ ~ n ~e v,a ;g"' 4P#'-' 'its. 71 C. - i - r - cn 3 .x~' v5a c -NCI z a, ti-s a., - - of .y~, 3F, h; .y £ s ..w~..,.....,~..,,,._,.Y.. -`~a~ua:w..-__.. ._,_..e...,...... - - - 4 ss z - , _ E~ , uY 11- d I n{ TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE ~s f r r - , `y a ` - - 1: , -11 I ti a.~ ~f' xs~-~ s~`r '3ti a F j ? : , Chapter IX ~ T >r t 3- _ _ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS v Section 37. CONDEMNATION. Section 40. BIDS. 'fi 1 Any necessity of taking property for the Except as provided or allowed by state ~ _ z 4 ' t City by Condemnation shall be law, all contracts for public improvements to r r a ps, dcic£u£ii;cd by the council and declared by a be made by a private contractor shah be let to ; - - , ° 1 r resolution of the council describing the the lowest responsible bidder for the contract Z~ ~ 11 11 - I ` ` property and stating the uses to which it shall and shall be performed in accordance with 4., t be devoted. plans and specifications approved by the ' Y ~n.~4~ - ' Y council. The council shall have the right to ~ = $ , Sect-ion 30. IMPROVEMENTS. reject any or all bids for public contracts. -11 (Measure 51, November 2, 1982 election). k T -he procedure for malting, altering, ' L :s ; vacarin * -ter-?,&t g or abandoning a public improvement MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 4 r shall be governed by general laws of the state. * t ! AM, i" Action on any proposed public improvement, Section 41. DEBT LIMIT. [:~;,,,,~-%0,~~,V,,' t , 14Y _ except a sidewalk or except an improvement p t - unanimously declared b the council to be ` r i{ i ; Y Except by consent ofthe voters, the City's z,y- £r~"Ft-~~' . 1~1' needed at once because of an emergency, shall voluntary floating indebtedness for general city c ~Wm * _ '11 be suspended for six months, upon a purposes shall not exceed the limits of state x ya remonstrance thereto by the owners of law. All city officials and employees who` k£ t ; , two-thirds of the property to be specially create or officially approve any indebtedness in " F = ' 4 - ' assessed therefor. For the purpose of this excess of this limitation shall be jointly and r ~z t k section "owner" shall mean the record holder of severally liable for the excess. (Measure 58, t 3~ R"i legal title to the land, except that if there is a November 5, ] 985 election). f purchaser of the land according to a recorded s ' land sale contract or according to a verifiedtF £ Section 42. §'vr 4., writing by the record holder of legal title to theb a A Y: land filed with the city recorder, the said Repealed by Measure 58, May 18, 1982 4k k ? - { purchaser Suali be dcell7ed the "UwnCI election. - - ~ w z - ~ l ~ Section 39. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Section 43. EXISTING ORDINANCES n r ' z ~a 2i ' r procedure for levying, collecting, and CONTINUED. l ~ The , , a enforcing the payment of special assessments All ordinances of the City X ~ I for public improvements or other services to be consistent with this charter and in force when it r_ r ` ' charged against real property shall be governed takes effect shall remain in effect until r _ by general ordinance. x s,_& ~ amended or repealed. , C-10 Reformatted 1994 i' u* } l , P f ~ ~ I.t J ty 4 t'. g*~Y, 'j ( k P - 3 i 3 y„ Y p ,1 Y L t - y? f _ C - U. ~ , ~ , - - _ I - , . .1 . - . r r r - I - ~ - 4.5f , !-n F K1-3 _ iF 4" - T , ` 7 y i r ass _ f E s i - ( ya [ - J { + 1 'i E L I I 1- 1",. . ~ ~ - ~ ~ . - - . . - , " M Y- - - r , I F . I I ~ - - , ~ - ~ . - f^ri. Y~_- r!+e -alb-rF"'~1 _ .yam. AA-Z -4 o-' x - ~ h t- 1~ s t R .xsy M1 - y - , fM TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODS Section 44. TIME OF EFFECT OF Section 46. x CHARTER. x j Section 45 is and shall be deemed to bean This charter shall take effect January 1, 1963. ordinance of the city within the meaning of ' ? * 7 ORS 457.075. Therefore, Section 45 may be# URBAN RENEWAL - CITIZENS RIGHT amended or repealed by nonemergency t TO VOTE ordinance adopted by the City Council. The City Council may in the future activate, create, Sce C, r. 45. reactivate or recreate an urban renewal agency" Y .i.uhvc.. ...Y.' r in the city in the manner provided for by law, The voters of the City of Tigard, subject to the limitations of Sections 47 and 48 5 x s exercising their powers as the ultimate concerning the methods for financing the governing body of the city as reserved to them activities of such an agency. by the ordinances ofthe city arid by d by the ~ Constitution and laws of the State of Oregon I Ceef:~n 47 t ~ do hereby find and determine that there no L - logger exists a need for an urban renewal The city shall not approve an urban agency in the city. Therefore, the Tigard Urban renewal plan or an amendment of an urban i ti 4 X t iss~ Renewal Agency, as established or activated, renewal plan if such plan includes tax by Ordinance No. 81-91, adopted in December, increment financing as a permissible means of 1981, is terminated. The facilities, files and paying the debts and obligations of the agency a personnel (if any) of the Tigard Urban Renewal unless, prior to the activation and Agency shall be forthwith transferred to the implementation of tax increment financing, € 1r ' r ~ city. The termination shall not affect any such method is approved by the voters of the ' outstanding legal actions, contracts or city at a regular or special city election held in+ obligations of said agency, and the city shall be May or November. substituted for said agency in respect thereto. = r If, at the time this section is adopted, Section 48. t termination of the Tigard Urban Renewal r P Agency is legally prohibited by any mandatory Any urban renewal plan or amendment _provision of controlling state law, the thereof hereafter proposed or adopted shall y s k termination shall be postponed until such legal require that the plan, including the method of z- e i l impediment has bcen removed and shall then finar=ing same, shall he approved by the voters x' ~ t ' a f automatically become effective; and, in the at a regular or special city election in May or 4 x""" interim pending the effective date of such November, if such plan or amendment would , t VjZ' termination, the city shall not authorize, or could involve the levying of a tax on t approve or assist in the incurring of any new properties outside the urban renewal area to k F debt or obligation or in the performance of any pay the debts or obligations to be incurred in portion of the urban renewal plan. carrying out the plan. Notwithstanding the r y t r + r c f C _ _ ~S tom' s,t ~ C-1l Reformatted 1994 i t 71 k ; _ 1 J Y 1 k ~ F s r S _ 7_ h_ - - _ f ' i - M - ---,;,~4~~,,~.,~tl---~--,- . - , ~ ~ ~ - 11 11 11 s=+,7 rte} _ t _ t - t - ` ads„ ~ - } ~ u.l.Y.>o' l f J 4.'14, 'te a a - - t Su. e - { -,p.,.ra~,.,.. .x7.-% - -..4`r,. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE f y J y~~ -4 s foregoing, separate approval at an election is I Section 50. not required for: cas ` If any section or portion of this charter t 7 ~ , n (1) Expenditures by the city, as amendment (Sections 45 through 49) isA distinguished from the urban renewal agency, determined unconstitutional or unlawful, the # ~ ~ i which have been duly identified and included remaining portions and sections shall be i' in a duly adopted city budget; or severable and shall remain in effect. (Measure ~a P 7 , - 451, September 20, 1983 election).h3~c (2) Issuance of Bancroft bonds (ORS w i 1 " 223.205 to 223-295) in connection with AUTHENTICATION CERTIFICATE OF ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r assessments for local improvement districts, if CITY RECORDER t 4 such issuance is otherwise authorized by law. 1, RALPH V. SYMONS, do hereby certify that x - Section 49. I am the duly appointed, qualified and acting , u❑ s1p - ',f - Recorder of the City ofTigazd, Washmgton - = 3'.-..' As used in Sections 45, 46, 47 and 48: i mow County, State of Oregon, and as such have the Kuk -4 care and control of the official records of said ~ ~a ~ r r ~ : (1) "City" means the City of Tigard, city. ,°`T,P 4~' ,14 -,V, 4 " j Washington County, Oregon. - - I further certify that pursuant to resolution of ¢ ` F § - 3 Q (2) "Urban Renewal Agency" means an the City Council of Tigard, duly adopted at its a F r = , O'N { lkr^ agency created or existing under ORS Ch. 457 regular meeting of October 8, 1962, there was . s as it now exists or may hereafter be amended, referred to the voters of the City of Tigard, in ' _ u i~ ~ 11 1z -7 or a similar agency with similar powers and conformity with initiative and referendum t I"- - £ s . i a ` purposes created under any other provision of powers contained in Ordinance No. 62-20 of , ' " a, 11 t , X3 law. said city, at the regular city election of " 0 ~ AI 1 -4 A1 November 6, 1962, the question of the 11. (3) "Urban Renewal Plan" means a plan adoption of the above herein and foregoing ' I 01. as defined in ORS 457.010 (11) as it now < Charter of the said city, and that a total of 631 M'ja€ exists or may hereafter be amended, or a votes were cast with respect to said charter similar plan adopted under any other provision proposal at said election of which 456 votes t ' of law. were cast in favor of said charter and 175 votes were cast against same, and that as shown by - a 4 11 r V . (4) "Tax Increment Financing" means the the official canvass of the returns of said F~ method of financing described and referred to election, the above herein and foregoing , ` F in ORS 457.420 to 457.460, or a similar Charter was duly adopted by the people of the ~ k ~ method of financing provided for under any City of Tigard at said election of November 6, - other provision of law. 1962, by majority of the votes cast. 5 r' z r s4 ' - t c 4 x - 4 ; , r k0.. i v- as,+ a - o F C-12 Reformatted 1994 ~ A i a F d I f { f 5 S y-_ t , t~ k p , ; 1- r Y x , _ f r ii `j i a ~ -'-s ~ -,,~-!:~t r --,,~Z - , - , - , - ` I - r. _ " , , . - , ~ " , , ~ , [.7', _i - P .,~ep, i s j ' i w~ f L k' ; n t 4, _Z ✓"r a. K 4.rl iq~ 5 C t - F z X y - - 1- .,a -7 P i - - x E , [f ~ ~ I - I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ , r " ~ _ . 1,,,,r,,.,,,,~ ' - -rl~ ; 1 - - t r- 1 t u, T , " , L z a u k n't 1W ~V ` ' -2 - s.. x^Y - 2 k.' t C v'7 - - Yµ ur E "t s~'r. t3 ~x<^z~zv-e a'Y?~,'\'a,~v. Zy, 4s',.* 1 _Lx - r t t ; y - f a;.„r"'r ~r4 t+tt `.u'' c y `'M - R . r" fs ? s a is $ * psi,. . NM V-2 PAM - Mffl'rxkv m r s- t s~ MWOK ~f R111 VXIN A'S H, TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE B r I further certify that I have carefully compared the above and iaYCyvinb copy wiiaa the 3 _ x of said charter proposal as filed in my office Y ~xae F and that the foregoing copy is a correct% kr s { transcript therefrom and the whole of said ? ? original as the same now appears on file in my ` M-w uk office and in rw< my official custody. y a X"i PP I further certify that by resolution of the City 3X-d I ' a k.. at - y Council of the City of Tigard, Oregon, duly k k s - passed at its regular meeting of November 26,~~ F _ 1962, the above herein and foregoing Charter - - was duly proclaimed and confirmed as the x Charter of the City of Tigard, Oregon, to be n~ 3 t , , q effective by its terms on and after January 1, - t 1963. ks In Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my s~ ti f hand and affixed the official seal of the City of 1F' ' s Tigard, Oregon, this 14th day of January, 1963.~~, ! IN-P - r - - Ralph V. Symons, Recorder of the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon.® x f r ` k~ ; - - S ,"w n's IYa'~ f• 4~r.k~'$'t 'r0 i~- h, N FY r F Y 4.1 C-13 Reformatted 1994 ',~,~'.c5 I ~ Y t J t,a-zr .ru"i e'CS,s4t, wi hi .r>;"rrs~~'t&*t x a 12 $ > x w t x t 6" K, ,E U Vi: 'fit' is, M r>{'Sc k4g„ p. tz v s xr f i - 5 .r' ''n M '~F3frs ~sz -""'(l'K _ t .{I q., r Y t~' 7A' ~"a a3 x'k r ~ts1L *:x- £ - fir' ts. J x r _t - '_~=tt>c,4m3aR l 3 s - , 're i s-''-r y `rR, r ? C t - 5 s{ ! - k4 ry ~_~r..'~`,,,g~'•~ Jv s~''2".zJ.. - •1 s ~r s _ + - , r,t z ~ s a ~ 4,~°L 2~ - ~ a -f -L ~ _ x - c-•e.2~.a.•~.;:~^~~~ssc~.~`r ate. e'§" _ 1 } t S r t _ 3 - t~~ y{-Tr {S'`'"^3"s'"$.-w,?bryr a 1 ~ w r a 3 x ev E ~ rx ..~._d;,r~,"„_,;,;, , .j , . a . a'`--'"tom 2°~z.a.~-` 3 a~' e'S.•. E s~~ k Council Agenda Item 1. U b For Agenda of R!!3(Rty ' .rz z §-"J V11 y.~- t'fi;•a.l MEMORANDUM WIN x `5 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON F~~ \ 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ' FROM: Bill Monahan, City Administrator s "n _ stet , e" DATE: August 1,1996? ~~y70$ SUBJECT: COUNCIL CALENDAR, August through October 1996 r'~ 4 Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk If generally OK, we can t 7m~~ x -A proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars. w ti to *13 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)-~~ h, Study Session qy 'Al - Business Meeting 17 Sat Tigard Country Daze Parade r n - ' *20 Tues Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) ;s z *27 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) t d y Study Session a a Business Meeting j ` September s 2 Monday Labor Day Holiday (City Offices Closed)+ xr, ? - *10 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) - E ` t ~k w ' Study Session Business , s' k Meeting *17 Tues Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 } p.m.) 4 *24 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) x y Study Session Business Meeting ~eA i -Sr ' vs3' T' October *8 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) w£ 4, a . 3 a Study Session _n Business Meeting r s : s°.... *15 Tues Council Workshop Meeting 6.30 m.3 *22 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)~yt TWE, Study Session. r+ g!'T'' ' r i g Business Meeting +K 7 NX, yy27_ 4"x'4 - - 3•r ag, 2 z, s+ r 4~` -,cgl iAadm\ca1hykoundAccca1.doc ✓ ra't`' _ - ^ - t f } - f 2-, h - - k 3~•r `tom a r c -.C3 a 1.- 4x S k'F°s r ..:1 r r ~ r V a. p~ yzr. z A S; - £ i L _ ~ ! 4 3p fy.g y qqY -min ~~r ;s~ r x,• i - -f ` '~k~,~~.~ zip 3 € r -,f,,5~7 TT-, ;Y - r IT, -gwq "VQ ''E - Agenda item No--12-b-- 'f Meeting of 1(3 IRtD 0_ Updated 8/1/96 r TEN'T'ATIVE COUNCIL AGENDAS (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are scheduled to follow- n= x' up a Council matter or request.)~~ , 1 r Date: August 20, 1996 ~ V t 4 } z Workshop (N / o TV) Type: € ~t r z° y r s _ utz ~i Start Time: 6:30 D.M. _ 77M ~XTFWI--, x 6 3 r f v Workshop Meeting Topics: a l u~ t > CIT Communications (Liz) F4" g~ s r r.,,l > Update: Metro 2040 (Jim)_ y > Status R port: Triangle Rezoning and Transportation Elements (Jim) r L r > Recreation Policy Discussion (Kathy D) Space - rinalize-long--rangc. short-range space plans and > evaluate fending (Liz) sx> > Annexation: Walnut Island Op ions (Jim) _ > Speed hump eligibility list/status of staff analysis (Gary) s L ks f s ^,3 s > Continuation of Discussion: Downtown Area (Jim H, Duane) , H, N 'Tr - {-y- F k_ `:`fr 5. -4 nmiv 5 a z}` u F F t z r vy.r~''s-~: ~kv s_ 4 vd,Y z ,,..,~„'-A-r.< ° '~_'st' -._r a-,•r-- 2- °'cxvr rvn.><~=•»- .f~- 1-~J s yrt v r, tr Mo,R 3 l _ -j c-_ p k- _ a s f, 7r ,a" t h' ^{tt ~>s tom,<~a°~_ tK- f i - - r r'H er NH!, I t'F'k ~ x t e n - - - mot, ~ t t ~TT 0-4 rte- - -c.. - ry~` J y" gyy BONN- IBM! , 01 ~ YC V, &5-i 4 M IT N IN ONE (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are scheduled to follow- u a Council matter or request.) _ F~ Date: August 27, 1996 3 06 - g '51 , x - ' z Type: Business (TV) ' Start Time: 4 6:30 p.m. Study Meeting E? ' x c 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting Study Session:] = T > Visioning (6:30) (Liz & Loreen)* " > Agenda Review N Rx h, r Consent Agenda: f ~t > Approve ro•.,cil r r...t R x~ °R r ; n > Accept Bids - Roof Remodel OMMUN a SE Business Meeting: * x w E h > Community Development Block Grant Proposals ` (Duane) : > Discussion: Reactivate the Homeless Task Force > Resolution -Tax Abatement for Community Partners for WE Affordable Housing - Tiffany Court & Villa LaPaz (Wayne & City Attorney) a a fi tpmT" 3 31,3 s s a"f - ` a ~j r 'c. m- x ~ °zc 1.2 ,..,.t"a~Ss. `limns s i RIO, Yom W" NQ E=` r•n 0 'n ~r b~ rm - neuaTr k ry r 4 fig ~r 77 } Fi J d J 1- - 1 eft a r, a s {'y-° S a*' - 4 - r e - • - y 1 f, A~t~7'ea'= a l x f-N'T'~Arr - 43 "YF T.'- % -n ,k"t ms's}S 1 mss, K - - _ r _ Y- y1 - ' tafqq F T :1 5 5 9 N ( S -i 4 1 FkF I - ~ ! 3 i . s.. r r° • - c - y - -r F- - t -cam. ¢ "3 `y " a u , . ~ ~ *11 ~ -1 O Stir S`s ~x,R"¢"s' ` + 2` 3 - s a 5 r " 7 r - Fg Is -F.~s ai.'e{t*` a's`F „ 4-r "'W - "x'ta' .,^..+Ez.'s - r k S y !'sus... y,.a~ S. ~ '~,WeVn. " ~ 1*'--- zF ` S " , e , rte' ? } - -s r+ °C ,4 a } ~ g M O., q a 4d: s;.l a k 'L eh, a. 3 1', i ~ ti (Note: items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are scheduled to follow-a dx; ?f up a Council matter or request.) F I _frx,: 'm R. "WO, , t. i 7, r - ~ Date: September 10, 1996 gy m " Type: Business (TV) r + } .;~~s+`'t' c - -V: it, µg 7- G T _ Start Time: 6:30 p.m. Study Meeting - .rp ~ 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting a~.zx ~ t E € y3 a k _ 11, 1~ --5- 3 S S gyp- - E 1 X za i Study Session: g,~ F x~ r s ~,:'"S'~ - > Agenda Review t2 e~ c `r`:s,~,s. •.e. t _ sti€3.!_....,. ,..d Consent Agenda: # t R > Approve Council Minutes I ~ ~ ~1 * kkE 'r Business Meeting: •wp' rr~ ^ : - , + 7 > Findi s/I ementation Consideration of the Homeless Tacky aa.°-v (Bill) - ` c^Rv$' _ j 1 - 4 > Findings Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan #W =x * i (Engineering, Police Dept., Bev Froude) , mY~r ? , r r$ > Public Hearing: CPA 96-0005 -School Facility Plan (Nadine) s ~ K > Public Hearing: Water SDC (Mike Miller) - r > Annexation Public Hearing -Sanders (Nadine) 4 ~ - , E = r a~ s' - ova ft - 1 _ x ' i y~, t X > -¢~sx i eat --t " k{$",g ,am.. ~ l- ,'fit' - "z s -t tt 'r 1 s' kid U P, k- =x^r,°r ~X`k'~i 7 ( r,j Yk jr s a s { F 11 q c. ye9. - . a r rs7t~ F.. L.. s-~"W a~ 'tar- r ` 'i T k ab "'Y5'?.L` 'SF. ' - it syY - A..cr x3 y r '',$~^s- 3-w a " r -'i _ "e ~~r it QV-' s,e ~cr x - s, 5i1 ak u ` Y xs r" l'nt C's `'*1'&,y.Yf - Y}-'i y -F - S i'7,3 'c 3`~!.'-"j -4~,:,',€" E 5° --3, 0- E rTz - - r - { fe ~,t'$ i a ~''F-r~~^ r y r#- r1 'a - a .y t ~'S lyy'35r r~ t - , _ ~ W~ , . . , _ _ . ~ - ~ I - ~4, - 3 Qj4 ,om l -M f - ' F: -5 ,st t ;53 7 t rk kz# a Y Zsk aski - - xtY y t `t-- 34 '~L,z7i3~E`t - l r ti NVO WA 216 1~ - _rr der: z 10 0 D ZOO. eME El ME% t - (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Councils Goals or are scheduled to follow- y*, up a Council matter or request.) -I W 5s llate: September 17, 1996 '0~ 0-4 -1< IN 3 ` Type: Workshop (No TV) t t t y'1tai,- "t s tom- c X33 ~"t''h'' 7% Start Time: 6:30 p.m. ~ WO } Workshop Meeting Topics: r ~lx ~ y £ - > CIT Communications (Liz)xN VF j 3 > CIT Communications & Meeting with CIT Facilitators and s ` a tF 5 C}aff Pesource Tea ' uVlitJ (Liz, Facilitators, Matt Resource Teams) y ~'s{s z• ` x { > Status: Metro 2040 (Jim) > Status: City Goals (Bill) > Status: Lone-Term Computer System Plan (hardware. pg ' _ h software) Plus Public Access to Information (Paul deB.) t , ' ^ > Mediation Program Update (Wendi Hawley);. 4j 4 w t S ~-M _ - 315 i i -a` -2, WIN A` n "'A x s' z4~ M ¢t F - r y r 4W v } ham- 74 Tw- h - tSt z:hx.h U t r, X a 7 x -2's'~~ x F - 1 r - rX J k., -L.. , i .i,. , .F , L•-, ~ * ,+8 ¢ 1 S v X,'rc~: a'w3.. s%d ^t't ' .^ut>: , " .A1".' , '>,x' ::.t ,.i'• J:"' -F,W„+, .i. ,.w4> "k I v` _ °i - ~•,~'..f ,.y, q, ,trdy. t t "5f~: .s •"X~;-r, ,.,,e;, t"r*,. a,v.> %A`° n < ?3>" :tJ', S:f' 4, _5u:, ":t*`5 r .5 ar,3v#' „t. ~i'`>r ' ~ :"`:U,-, n,• a! .n,,yr-," itt ?rc.~ ,efw ;*~~`5 a k;.;' ~ ,;+a;'~:>'` s ,~u, t •it. „c,;,- .o-., x e. t.' as§ ,:G. . r; . ~ r ,J . .r=t, a•`'~,r,'^"~:-,.'ud§'y r•,+ i-.r..,,• r k s ' n,•E,:. ~'µM 8 ~a s. .'w'2 - t E".~ fi P. 4 iY ? h•',2%r- 4 At,~s~ e i y,+." ~•'M•.".'_ >t I` 0 r 5 kt... :W.' a7`d`- ..K o,:S. 5<-. '+k k' 1 ..F, sa'v'v -1 ,i t'•1.^' ,°A i ~a' t L. Y' . Y :v ^y_'. ,[,li"',' . P" t ~l ~ •9 ,r, k r 'k TyE" as d• 't}' w6.„ ..,c ,"Y :°~'b'h 3' aaf., ~ -g.z .$n. °'i N -t 3w..< w;k,. ,er: ',r ":s'aa'•t ,,,~FC:j -'§'i~• 7 S~ a ;ten ,a".'h,; .`I.~' *.d?"{ :t"~'• 3> r' rv F,_ - .,m „xr v `.~farb. xtP .q~ k" 1'' • I r, r. °'~•2ro 'a„ 'vt~'.>. ds. ,ft. 14 a<,Y+:~t fi w>• w . n +b:'t•, , Y.,° .-rv° =1 •,.'3"t ~ t, .r .{x a r~ ,C,v , Y~#' , s r", , . • , t'x, y+~ <'a#~ ~ t "`c`,>r' '°.F ..t a:4 au°°r..-<'t °A7, :,T.~'ind`:°q„~• ~~>r' k"e §^x aw>a'r°;,,,7~. « a=u r i,2 . t , W7.{ .•~'"r~ ~ ~ m ,,.9,' (f,nr,'.,, ~a d e< •~~f n, `s ,e ;,i f• -:A'b.,' `"h~,r, ,'til ,K, r'ti,:..r 4:a - t„ t " v ..:np7 n':9i a .t+`°te ' ,t.:-.,y r g } v'}s • r, rt ✓ 1 + v _ Y;t. .r`rio-a,x.a;x.3 *,i~,l^,Y {'r'w 1.'S! ro"'? ml ;.'•ia: t•+k A ' , 'x, 4 a~ aRw,- a 4a'-'a:t1.a +;=iM a"- ,F•x ;<,y„ "'1~~'• ,,,d,_ ,e.,;~ mss; a~~: ¢ "sk- '.,5,. :"t"s;-:r. °,'"~'x r"§ r :r,,, Y`r ...fir„ ;'t, "~.7 ''?'1,""~~ 3.. ,>r ~ ."f r. ~ r . 'a w :a ~ vet,.. n _ • .aw > r y- r , ..,T}, '-tip'>- ,.Ys ..°,r+^. n'• "f*' ^x~ 4't ~+A i-4 b - °°Y," .•,id tS' F, a~a'a~ i ~~f., ..""s•r., a. ~'i -^m.h Jam, ' +t d` ef' i' f ,{'.~:.r•:`.a} n, , -e,.,w~, 5,+_ )P". i ,xSY h'k'~'.. a -zFr ~u,. :✓,a i .r ..,f°<r r 9 w , ~ ;ka r h'.• 1° n ,T• f ..y .,:Z . ♦a xe. "ti#1 A:M4~ 2' sr ~'N mS*. r-~~` a vJ - 16✓r -*~..,wY - ,z~i"f.`-*-tZK S# t ..'F L '•%s" AAA" _ ° W.'C erg aV { K rte 'OKI Ord J,i d,~' 1 T t v' l t, yap A~ rt}{ ~ {yfcY~~ - r 's• „r t - F~ ~ r S; ley irk OD yy-- C I~ t rr e ~ 4 { i > 1 ~ { a t _ r r r ~tt4 T~ s,. -M, AS, t f c ~ , Ctl n a1 al 1~ d x~4~ 1, R!G Y C r~ t .g . 2 d 1 fjy F O t §C ~S jE s r s ' ~ 5• ~ ep, ~ ED ~ i -t r xs~f7 rr~r ~ §,t i , 4 > : d 'I ^44 A _ O y C a t r~ i ~t r - 1,17 O O s, n~ X ~ t Pr e ~ < w . y Jp c f, ~ , S k' kid 4 C 00 c 4 r 3 } 1 1~ A - xr O E 1 k ~ t ~ 4 _j A S 1 I i t ~ g t r~ a ~ a ~ h at r , a o ' r °i a, J i } t 4 F ~ 1 r 6 f } } '1 f - ,`,T L` "Z {fii t (y -Y ik s. t~ ° t - e A r.§L { ~y f 1 2 i c j `<.',-,^T*^±,,,. ~,"~`•-.p.,s,~>n• '~"+„r~:, 'R.'.. 'P.`!94zr~s+k,.v.'t$a }„r•w§'a§~~.t.mi"' 41f f> C ~ S ' r!'4 yr. .p n g, gsn~'M+ 'np .a~• ; ash a ~ C .3 „y l-~ ,~:"r r ....;,.,'s .,.,x .,rs°,.,.. 4~~..«^'%~^ fl- .e €~=m' s il.µ t ,lx:,#{ 4','` d. rus- i~~:•u`", ~_rs'. 7 .,d- °xS 'i 5e•'~r< 3. "FC. ° k' . 1 ~ `^aa. e. vy -f,- r_i~.~ .4'i' A .:rk ,1t+ vY (f,;s ;i,'~t~, u1 S: . ;:ter:- , xr~,; ' y„", ,!`•r "r. r:" , aRM , `M-sF.^^.. a~ .,h x ""'{°'h .'F,>' . cd+: ,rs; ; y^:^,` ` ~ ,}i ,r ' W^.3.A, fi1 , -t;;' ,i7' • f' N ,..t,~', - a. sT : '?wV" F $ :E6^. y ,P~'i"" >t` , . a >s r~k • a?a*t ~-~*r., a°,. '~"l~'' J tt" Y,. +v'f• ,fixt ,^r2 ,v.e ^x :o'ri~,:r':<rF.. r ,f ,at. r:~y , ~ ' <{~~,r , -vr,,. + ~ ,try„= '}a`' r§ .,.rev ~ n~, l sr t.v1 c~a .ors ~ -.r, ,iA : r. i, .,s, , w°; §c r. 'Sf,. fh w' 4 ~ ~ H*,' nt•_.~g ~ t,€'', . ,h•w- - t`'-"'io-<::k"'w e ~r .,+t,.. s`+~`"s r ':F~rx r r7!' r',~ r ula~ a, „s ",k iY., •'a~ ,e~'rw a ~,x, ,•r:t' r3.' ~",ty ° `.1. . t.:r:< s.. .",S`"r. .sP}*rr.L,3' ` ,Et°`. r . „~a, .w,~. r? . -,s. 'yk' r§'~itk', . a x a..; ,s r.a i 1 {„~Y'i.-. ,ti,a, a.Ffa^rs' ~Y'N?°. 1':x+'vt''° .7;~'`~ `~vk ~ ~ Y b'>~'. f• -t§, f 93.. 1' `a~r`xt°~ d.t4' ,~:y..., "'~ti~s`+Ak,. ,ne. +'-.Cta ^.,L•,,~~';,~ rC, f v ~K" X~ a~.,~ '~1;~~s'~ r r .w' ~:l r. r. xp;,,>-.y-i :v: ,wc:~,r, z"fir.. gp.. ;,,'S.r,~h,,, r'.:-~ „-+%'i: §~.a`t~ '~q r'~A'+~': ~ ~s ~4 ,e xh~ ,~:"v' ^n'u.u~.'.`", .t"',yr, "E; s,•~w~' -ra v,~+`" - d. A .+r ,a. - ra ,A✓' ' q, t;.+ '-v trn ->r, 'Y' ta,". , ~,s; ~'nt° •fl'=Y . ; ,..»q.a,. kr`., "rrr,„.✓,, .fi`~«~a,rw-.ro ,t:'~_."~,b;~:~'" v"a z~ "~;s, a. ~'~3'~. er. $rm.'k~.:, l ux+S.;''e:.:'t rs.,,,.>,,. •~sk[ - :..~d ~-•=:t~='r;:x, , t"'>9 s°'3~„ ,{..~;sa -,rr +'a> , , a3.: err, f t It Z"..~^k-7,'Sr,.. - :7 't 'n>:r'. ,~.r,.r , x g M- . n~~~~ E•, s ,3w-" d•a1 "'E:., ~~i N~ ~ f E F! ~ e k~9,d'i t • .,t, nr>,. ATg'>i'3:."n a. °a,,e - r.:~~ 3,~u"+> .~<d. °~Fv " y, },d~"'' n 5. ~r ,'.J~i :A .h~ 1• Fe:!:p :S e=, 3S*r..r , r. , 4 i;'. •s., 2 y~~.} `•`ds~ ,s}rv~" .,~°:'s . "r~'. e . ;N ~ T y xs . r, u:4 ,dq ,x ..Y!, -s,,P•'~, ~.`E'n`-,'"adr ' ~R ~S'x ":n •-'fi~.s, 't ~ .rs r_ ,c§'"e3•. 1 .>,ru', q -.w,"~ ~k ~ ~ 3~''aY:s~ d>~'. r? :¢t~` a, x+ ,'~G,. .t r+ v a,: ~l ~s 3 n{,° ~N '3§';- J:,•„'~k!*' t•dA, :°~'a .y.r ~'~'S fin,. ~~3 ,r ~ +~'s'' 's ~ •'z ,x-+, ~r• ,"z•: rL 1:- 1•".y - Y£i ..+3.' c'L'~'- , xF~+va, v ~ ~H o-~r, r ~ +4 ~ f~,.c w, a eta, e, ,,,!§^r'.J,x,'.e~Rsd °,u;~%?S n.` .tt rt fl< s..n'S, .ds ,r~~r ,.'hr.. „•e~', .x .!r da: ar,. s~:~"4i< .i~ ,.,.t .~i,'^71 t. '~„'yft q~aN:t`, ':x e .~r,xs ~ ?s ;a•, ie' u,;,.= . °*J°'K~.Jx"" ",r` ':~';8~"r5' :,t. ',v'~r ~'r,":. , ' ~ _ „ , `F .,."~"»P„= ~-:`,°ta?:~,,.rl ~ ; { -~'"..k'.st'~`'„*<,q.s;3'F^„nx5 ' •c~..,nya ~'~,rt,'yt-~`,,G Y '"5d 4,~~Afi~',~'3h; .6v s Yfr,, 7~`~~ ','~.-y; f;Yw'.".a' + F.~•,.~~>,.'t~.~ ~ 4s k~.'.>54 ,rx„ '~a'~,~~„k~ , ,¢o .r';~e ``~yf' ~."v °s~ ~r_ , 5,~' ~ ~ •h 1, „ k ;S a~.-l, sAI. a s .'L ,~ih'rt r ,„t.« ;'1•:+` ,,t" -k., k .,4;: At; ? srn*,. ;'k S~^ -:^=.`k" wt»;> ,-4 -3' r•,,,~ ,.'v .'~w t: - ;x'^,:e ,y hr:;n a.,, ~a ~~'e ,.4 .'Y~ < '?"^o±s T'»c` 1"r.-";';,- 2 I_ "t r`;,-~-. •t s•.•_" I } r^ .;'»•-r~ ~.c ""vs•, 2Ar•a rl _,M1~ .>1•^^ * ;jy^{rr'^r~,'; s ~ 4'" , 6 a- } F rti t: iL ! f r k , t;i, rr _r,'fi `t r, Ri.. + 4 ! v I.i y. `a ® l 4 ' ~'r* { ! t c I 7 1 z i ~ 1 .~'I' ~yy I { tit; F~ ~ 4,, a ® - {y~ l x r ,71 i - r L ,6. ar ~t1~7• g' d • . ~,}~1 ,~'r.r~r_, d ~,£e ,I . 42 yY-- - - J -'i~ i 4, rk t } 7 = 7 a. QAN- M y M ,b" D iEit r r "3 r - S "~~ee- gt2 2 - 'fir 3-_ .~ro», RM, -fss av"- ~~'`"'c_--~""F.s-:', 'qi z t 5 a _ a ~ 't °t & z . d. M "T I 53 o- ~L~. e~ + Sep ~,N dti 3 i r r j TWA gg- WR~ (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are scheduled to f„no..,_ - 7 up a Council matter or request.)~~p.~ -r<. . yak F Date: October S, 1996 Y r,$ * r ry sa,. a 7 WO" F Type: Business (TV) I'M Start Time: 6:30 p.m. Shady Meeting a* ~h 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting'. K Ng .Study Session: E t > Agenda Review 7 `5 Consent Agenda: } > Approve Council Minutes Business Meeting: tz-x-k-t'a S~ , e -5-rr Fib yap ^x t a ii v Vs, WOW Ca~s3'Dy;A r y fz # rt°.P z"r Z_ W "N N 'lea "g r dn"` ; Y .rvF F - I•e G4f y ~~~4fK C ~ a~'~~~ ~z5 f°....-..,.., ~v;+ rr'~~"{. ~"F x~- ~ '~"'.„~.:~eg~k ..i':~'Y",y'~'~a'3,w?9.s' : ~'fctc'w•";,#z~,.w 3'~.~y~~~~~~q~ S y' RX, ,a, z* a hl SZ, -7 '417;~Y NIA: IMZA N-. V1, Ng g 7 - x a -_~aF' f a. f 1, r ;~,1t r f }r l C: ri•' I a 1• 4 ~ t M t;. S ; t i ® •.~`*~I i5~i1,7<:~...._:.:.a,Ji.'.,.~.:u:::. L.rE..<.,.;.L._..,.,,e..,.:~~F..,t.....~c...ll.:a... ._..7a ,L:L ..,~'~,a.. .i J rA 1,L t,- Yu„ r:', y,; "o-• .4 b. x •..gt ..x, rYn a'„- =h 5«.: '.c i ' _ - ',1'n':r 4 ,~yi'., E, i<w„:,+~a +t. re^ ~r_~w,.~`e. E~, ym: •S~*i,' ~ 5,'v7(re+M `r. c.~s,~F _ r r.. k^ , , ' , , ;,..,s x~ 4r sad xs'~^~' r,~ , ~ ~a,ai~'«~ ,,,et.« (x';af• • ^~»^A~'a:: ~ 5 -irs':?k'Y °ac ; 'Z : .~,a 2`.^! v~ ~E. ,,,w^, 'E girth fi~ ~a" ±~n ,aa: ,f,-, y~Y,'~ M.W,ro 'tE ra~.'`~~, ,k`.3t»: ae•5d .,e;,; ~ ~ " ~d r+ td- , ~*".i' 6•.s'.. =L f•p ~ " 4 x m,~, "§i.~ r- 7~' 5, ~t ,.v.m~ ' 4 ~4~'<'. ai..,,,, - asp, -.g;- - „ s9'1.., ,.r,,.:~: '.,,a" ,,tt~s~~~gSv~..t.~fi;a n a.,.t-0, ~.s~~~• ,r~ 1 .Y ~ y = 3 .bp ,tY c P. .uL'4 E ky... fi''r' ~dt 4A. ~taP ~~:';2F r9` a(. t h' ~ ~ a^ : <'ii; _ fi ":sa w , , + ovii 'xa. c ii i^ :N t ' ,.,~'f'•' yn~ ,t3' m e' ~ ~7~.°x', h~ ~a ~'•tl ,.Y ~ Ns~ . ,r .t-u, :..}a .-a~i". 'R'~Y':~. ~r~....4r . a ~+~t_e•,.., I 7-. 'h, _;~..r ~w:< .St,,, x.s.- iA;~:kr. .'~o ."~=4~,vw,ce, . s:~'S'd` : .m _ F., >s•s . aY' ~t, xr xa~z~.,x- .`'Yv,,-J~.,t-:,::. e ; u ,¢r`a+r~..,. ~^,1 ~ s „•.``~s .7.,cr~w~ n'~.'r~ m r"' M'trn ro , .r : R r><~ x.kCx ,'o:' a+ . L . ,G: "rr, Uri .S ~.-r- ~ i; x y , ~ w• a - .j, , w~< h ;r,•t ;"frr . a y 1_ :S* 7> +s?' -n, a'xe .l .f „L.~ x nT'3 al'"w. ~a£ ,'fi• 3 P, a~ ~ ak *+a: 'T i r'1" •A'.4..v` .W ~a ,e}~~' 3., .N.f, ~~r a,~:a , f~". ~t°b ^.~nf .Fo s " aYc..,~Y: q .r?;T+°t~ ,*,9. .u s,, ag i~ a5tk +~••.s:" 1 .F .~i vr' , `gy'm - r' rn r- ^ .e+a=` r,3t. .n. h' ..3t3,,i:`m .kr- 1" `,x~i.-'~,''.`,~.:;.: Vii. vs.w "`c^,Y,`• a'~4' "~lu ..eF,t pA e`b p ,r ~1 it s ~ • ~ 'r s ~ 1 • . 4'4, Y"1'J r rRSSn ~-a ,.''i att : ,.,nk uii k .4 •!a , e t1 P„ • .`'d'>B a}.„,'vr&.~~ .t i 5. .9,` "b~." - •h r:,',.i, v.,r Ti,`•~i~. v~ a,`ir",.1^wsa>a•.~=+cri.: ..'~a.„~. ~.'~u,b 4,y }"t J z§' ~-v rk,"", ,s ,=I4 3 ~ s 1. .~:ra,v,.?n~.~u%a' i I ~ S f~tats rv= a k~i, ~ {I r h v O tF r 'r I fp i k ~ ~1 ;r C r 1 r' 'k Y r x-3 6i Cs } f r t- ` it ~ SI ~ 1 ov 1-60 is F .f E ~ C~ aye t } QQQ lot I "A. 1 "I 9 t ! r !JF ` PI i r ~ b vvy" r i n a t •O C~..q OO a ~ r - 1 , U v c v S pp s ~7 a Ann 1 + f ri, y L yy y i- yi Jx 0 6 fU .Y a q r a QV Q 3 Ao OAAA A m w n ~i' c b'r a o ~ e ni' x a~4 r~ rx ~ ~ ~ ' !':r bt t + vim -43 'r~~,~t 1}rh rt'~~7 ~x t~r~P4 k G O G ~ ~ :I t r~g5 ;5,, r r sy $ O e«~0 Q v~ v ~t ~ ` 1 t~~~ sJ Kd,3~ r~ {w L5'~ ~ ar t ' r` { I k 'E' ,iy y }y:k+G Jt"4 a* E - r~' v"rt vy (I r.+ ~ tt ~a6 a,,~ i+t}`31 5 5',-t~ r, 7 tr r ey =i ra,„',f',c-~`N ~(S"f~gt ~}"~'Li~,J'~7<~Ek•'µ%~: tt°;~.rt?.. x=e ~t~'ti f'~rx,. P€ as ,~,-'r''Ynw ap~ # vi F',"S, k «,7"'x',,`.r.1,.,~,•'° °",z'^,. ,°5;"s i",w'~^,^~^^^^*-•r'•r-r-'m~, .r v' -rl` G :ti r+ F T{hL r•^'~ rr° . ! . <'"3', i.-eirs~, h , t' - a. .'r `'('r,' ae' , k, - d^I•--•--°vt'''., :.r• _ ;r,, s S 4. ":vF ;a ~ v >x' r.,. . 5 r r ; ^'s'. "i'"""1".."''-=1 r , a:: " =i,ae,ae,~€"-',r,,, : ~L } u~ wy .9N.. r 4~w' fi fr C L rSMA l -,.e!` t>~v .trY'i "I""" S t~., t « 4w. J Z 2 I e ~'x'r3xs nos:` •"4~. ',+"'3 'G + ii"i g } • 4 ,.Y ~r MM a. -'l,.,r _w n,➢Id. aF fy".i•~~:~o Yitl gg ,..3i.,r;• 5"' "'k'' °'Si ~ i ¢r xfi"-; ,L. ~1., ^.4 •,,t 1, < S, x,..,»a.>nu;, N ' e ."t x - ,E a ~ , ,."r^,s.:,^s... `yq•. { w;n'',~', tG2 a.. S{:* z ;r?~.'r, C+ , .fir., ri:Y .yr~ a~` , s~;.'">a..;>i„`•x:^~»~;', " ~ - § r ter."=:> 2`,,..:, r "t•3},, N '..5,? „y3 _r^t, „C.• 'r l1`r`'"nr =i1' .}e. :fs i y~ n.. S Q'e"•o-,.c t tai'' . ~ti-' ri T„Iv>t vV _ .•'F-..,rn.. nyyk. +S.k, ..4'-..u.. T• w1,~ `~•v ^ik Ld.-•" .1' is v'I`-•: +3i+.'.. '`}n?ar. F ; i t +f.~. L• • A' 5'.- 'ti!''., .,i a. T'4 t; F. k "t u.,'b.:,- arr,.^ aps ^y.. "t~+'t(4 rt i :x2 ~^rc n '4yi"",t,,: G65,i, jj ~r ,x1 t ..y," tii," .,t♦`- s„}w ,C" i 1 t`~§s`<4: `.•„t,ti.'~::,;:iF 4'+~'ab• 'tr~ w.MY, ^dn . 4, "S '~,s ^ . t ,-•kF P+ ~ „ir..", x ,.Mr- ~ •:'a<r, li'`'f 14r:' ` ,i -E St:°.•"g„ , t a s• ~t. r ~ r+•v, } k .1~, , ,.w`i^a'•-" {,,.r.+",..r f~ }}~Y".~ ;d:a . ~"me,t: r'"':«r<, r., t, ~.+$^:q,. •~fE` E <L~ 'it. fi e..V 4 {''"'in :L_!S„ '~C 7, h. fl ~4 ,a1. r}' 'Sr~, a' P~. i ,4 r;< }r '`,3., ,.•-3$ 6 h, e. ,~,~yy kr` ,,y ~'j,, a''^,c t51r ? ~'xi r.•1. 'd, a,~'t , ~~3, °1?k. ..1- ,c",- i«4 •wt c C+'SR4i": Fse.:'r' ~ , v<L°3' . S ,r`x, i ' hit' "h""'n'"• kl/ h, .>Ye F`t°`" ,R,: 'lk.:'s , 't rr 5` n`k,, get >i,:",*v -:'Y:~`•.! v4 +YV`~.' ' Yh'' r,,,A T A = k. ":i# v ~.:J... { , Ott 1, 'St: , 4 ~ d;, r°-~Y a y,s,•" ~,''e>i i:9F° K '"=Y '`k~i .d,-- "'.+E `'~:`e5 ..:~SMV' s+~ ~g; xxs'. t fl ' r~ fc'v ,.A^.:'r.,, .1 a .c. „ f~a• - a'>~3.. ,x„' - x+t ~ a ' . ' ~;",x~''. .n`h " a~':,,, r , ~ , "r "a^~ z.~ x•,~ • f>~ , ' -r,.,. , , ,h . r~ 1~: -<'''a",<,^h,. ,v. Ir'' ..a'f. "s:'"~. Y, it' .i.", "::A-,~., ai a:•.gr„,,.g .:,,^,a." •:,.+'n~ ayx .w'9.. 'E`, ~7., .^•r. ~":^i+`(;i' arnw;"' .r:#'.u tt~~.. 6.,a . . , ^'a',,..^.. " F r*•"rk: , r'f. t: ,.t .as,'e ><x, "•:fr. J*,~N~, e,ew~ '4. ,s.a y.Y!P .r.~^*,, i ;1 y, ,y,.,,"M,r nv, +saL- _ nrs. + rz'7'^7~ 'I 4:< a,+,r`,%7., a» ',•r~ `mot, :m•^.;~s, r;^,y"* Fr ` u~a.. _ A e'~~d r r n ~ df" 4 a .`i 4 r`E- es•.:,-. .r.9, ei}'.. p '~•t:';:%Y<: ' .aa*~'7 ,s^' IE•' '2; r.'an, <,.'~~•s€,'~.~ . 3, .yrd~_ , ~ . ~ Lu r. - 7, s v<v- ,r r'~.4,> v 4~`", ',x. "t'~.. •6.4 _t N.re,°ai r . t,,. „t„,:.`r~ ,4<+n -:,i"' ';A..7„ '"~.la., .1. 6 w°is t'-,•,.~I'.~l`.., • i s. •e ~ :s,,: 3,.r.-rr a`Z+' rf ~ 4 t•7 N hm.,. :n., r'.,, _`4t'd ,:,x," ' by R~ 'iS. a» , kx.. % .x a, °iP' ,tv++' t'K • `S^,":„'ss fi t, a "„Md . ;r ~ . _E"., . c+~,y "lr'«~. ,y;a c' ,Y ~id n,• "it",1 Ai-..}}%"".,.nc. ,s ~ s.,. -t'a"„`a~a, a~.~6 .a .11a^ t,r '-•7., .>nx .^i g;.n r•,sr ,b,nY 1„ ~'8°ta`" K-rks rd 'l m, - z!• .h-.. r.~a'r= . <'~f~=,. ..,,.3. :°d ',a' ry ~2 2 r : a-! = am , ~f ^ x pt .t,^ .,+r k','n . a v.'~; "^`h" s•# f P. , 4 v+~" .k "r.^`. lti r w 3•.,- rr'F~^." av d"a„ , f,<, ..:-t9"~v +nf#S: "```ea,'.. t . &+,r +4`, ,5a. n r^i2 -+,tS,',. t ".Ia. , f: ' •''r s t, 'w:~ i ,,'stx u; 1:, .xY*•. Y,. , ta2.s r.x 1,'~''•: ,,5:~:'^ yg@ ,r .!tv,.,, 5 , 4`Pi''k yv°t -r,:, .tr 1 6„ ",ir f'"'gmY",I , ,r ,fe,-r, "+1. `.i14'.`k,•r, "r,,•.~,, v t~`7• tf„-:~ , , 10, 1, l'I ay - tt;.d7 -v 4 St. ifz~- "5,.a' % I~QtZ~ILIW M., ~sr- ?9,.s..w-s5 gr " £x' x .€y, 'k - s u - _ _ .sL r - t "'`'"•,t S 'i-- -k°'-..~~ru s RIM 2xx+°~'27 a~ x (Note: items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are scheduled to follow- € x y ~ ; pair. 'r r 3 k'..-may - # ~ ~ ug a C .,errcl1 - matter or r-e~--que- sk ) x~ €ir 4 Date: October 22, 1996 iJ'Ik: u.,:,.ca1 C v) .czk lni-mg Start Time: 6:30 p.m. Study Meeting 3 ~vr..4 F5 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting Study Session: n-, Agenda Review 65 ~ Consent Agenda: ~r > Approve Council Minutes a'~ Business Meeting: i r f i Y > -z > Public Hearing - CPA 96-0006, ZON 96-0001 - Dr. Davis g µ s" x - 7 (Nadine) S K r w s~n v p gg, kSat oaf' 1 yt ~ ` we ' -Ts VMW TUZ Z,U IIS- `«~..e ~,iY7 .+t F Y aya „ r' e fr f _ 1 y 4 7 .G4 z'~`Y4.°*,j} k MAN 1W. - W -4y -6,4 k Nv, 'Zy„E' a ~r~'s. a s w „fiF s a- H -.f ~a If is yf ~ fP t 0' , ~ s - r F: t i 9 t r x r; t~ '3Z fSj:' HM "s?~: f t i f f i 5 4 ';i ® ~~'~a~`a~h~3aha~_ ~~vz;!•s~4,t~,~°r:;f~:y_W.z.~_ _~~~_,~.._,a'...~w.L.~.,,,W~..,..W ,..s.::~..I,.. ~..a: ; ,t...~-...~,_.~m,.~L,;,t~ !~2 - 41,.., au--'4 ..c rr:e.•z!tw,,.• ~ t+.,'~f-' ">n,..:. ,.<.,.,.s~ ax ir,~• `f M.t. F,r $S. c9. aN' a ,.~M 7h4 J§j, '?a,' ,N. w. m v'-d n..#C 8r Ike ae- p.w-...,. Yf ^_'~Xv a4.' "•<Y vs-., ies'd ~4,". ~`L£.r -5- .tl•„iy✓^'yJ,'.„:.~ t 1 .':~=,`-'t ,.~_„.r;k a;~a~°s3 >x~t,~'. ~ `e .sue., _•~`"d ,„s,at+ t, e~ • a4'e{,~? ~~.s,r~.- r~,.k S~ ,11; :«k ..ar '.u ~r."a,' k„ °Y ~ x'f``~?F.r ""°~,~.+.`~tw• 'F : 9y'',t',~,E,•. -'~n- "`"Y:,t. >:w'- : ~k ti ~L,+i" xy' ",K~° a. 5 9 -X~'~ ;i" -"'"u~~-ems ask}, - 4a, ~ . ,•k' S: xi . . ;>,s , ~ °w n ~ x 'a N: .,x,. , a Y ,:r"~_ . ¢t~.x,. _ ; a , d~ • n~ ¢ f.,Y fir, ;s kk, . 1 ~6r. °r` :rxtr AM :,;w. srrr 1: .t,••5r;e, - > - 1,Y. 7Fl , .,.a;-€t?<- 'ta' u>,,~ aF:'k,a'', ~ ,~E' s#k y.,~, 4$;. ,d# i'. cax.a.~ '4 n •s-,~.',E, >,r, u -se>ata, a._> tr ~e~~"p .'r.s fi d"{~'^~P ...~'r-C :.,t.. ~r, ~r, 6s,'Ejw,~,, '~.R===x r o~:t`<u~• a;""=..~ 1 wt•>hm..vn:,,,,,.. a ,.~;q .4.. it'd. ++.....M.-- #4'L.r- -'Y. ~4YE' ,1»„ a ,°i2r ` S~.:S, ~,c •P ^-T r;«.. s:,, 'k.:=.,..P.e " e. '1' ti;nr,r.+.> - ,&~~at. e d'r t^ •e.' >x "x'~y, C'YS 'b p.YV•n n,r~u ,"u ;r;;~, a ,.r u.,yr d+ c "v~r,vu*.. F.x . a. b Mn5 ~ "`t •f,` a" ..,.`s, ..~•*y ,•~;,;5'x-yt~.~; `~~'`;s,,i: f , `l, ~S, ~ 3 ,t» ^"a;zr.h `c.-,~~^r.+a~r`~' r..•r~.=, ,r I. .r. ,~X~,:.,,~,k_«~ri - ~,^i ,w~a ~+E, 4'..,g,.~~ V ~..t:'a'Se"' +r 't*,rr •a `";-r" IN 1 , r: ^•h ,.+t-0,r2 ..y Y 4'ss , "Y 1' ,.v:} -ro~„' 3 d' A r' d, ~,vr arr yn„y„1rF,n, - 4 -:u4C' siJ'1>W.^', 4~:T 'j~M1a+V. (d+" ,'pt :wi r-~S `L•. .Y»~',' d. Vfip' k<h~.. w^~. ,tbm .,pia .r'~£-, ~ "`}r.,r:. wit ,u, '~u Y• .ar."< xr.. ar, .,rv7= ^a.; r„~,' T ' .`ti,.e .tr..,- _ s'.~,`,•: ,c .`k:~,', *•r3 ~3 r ` d' x ?e .t ~^":^"ku" ..'fl'+' 1 "f+,t ,.wrx ' ?.~'.M:t',~°,. ~s,<- ~ I.h xt .:•5~',. z ,~ay~.u'3' :-A+. -."1 t'.u ,a<+d '-"o vh tar ;3~ sala'd' > s ro-zt.N- ,h, '~,FS', ,,.1-.x•'•u'I~rr tc. F" ~ '2 ~'.s"~-~:r•" ,--r ..anr ' ° tv~ . ~•5 .«a. X., +.r., na rr~ 7 •~r.;,A; i.,..+.-sr , 4,,,. fi'~.I„ia' a,~x,.=,: ~'ee.v~r • ~"s' ,'_.,,u s F ~ F::I r%X•,. e`<_ ` ~V aq ! rq., q'' .e'es stiff A ,•-,.,-c ,-M ~:,q vv Af,"s' .d,~ _a,.,si avy 5 >f=. y,,.r•~v;_,,,. , t..ry':"'°,..,. =r:v °'I „4., Mg :'qtr `,ro . .'.ot€ >J >r:N - Sr y `7~ ,~:..n x~."' •„~i'.:.5•z" P~~'ro a z ?.i E;, ~ F.^~"` ~P 4x .f ^><fi S ' „ut . ~r6 ~ f -x. ^ - "2" :.h'.y f.;.'i~'a Eri z~'3a,'g''rr F• +"a ,,*1:F""".,-..r, Lgy'^wr F,.., .~'.`r X•,".x.~j`;,.,,;.,-v:.a;,%.' °1„'t' , s?a ,R .;~'°H. ,y' ."90~ a^- '•r' ~M. - .s ~ 'C, a*.,':.. X:, ~y y'i •rr 3' YbW.~ aA: F N •s"+"4,. M1 . ,y~ - ,t'"#"•u.r fl .4~- S~GV ~ h , f"X`M's`"a• eL=', , 4 Y is , e ;rE'=" rg:t° tA- ~ 1~rw .efv• ~ fr' 4. 1, i+' ~ s C "',!r•,' .,r: S 1 x il' ' } „~X +r4cit , . 3 , er'it*'"` xk,. s }i~ J`S"ai ~~yt. ~S ~ r . F.') _a:r{y., ,f•'9 r^ , .i~ .n,a~• 3~ nv`:v~ ",v-.a ta...,.,r`:'> _ 'r. ~SS *'''t.. :t'4 r`L €F s„+ S dz a <;kr 2, sti', ~l»;s ' r. _ ~ x { yes",w <':•w:.. r~-,<:, :1~ $a ,r^.. ..~s•• .t: a'rr: 4'"'wy,'' .:34m ~x.'* .a. ''S " ' x"rs V ':a's~''G' d+v`- M~K>n., 4!"~ f~x 'a t~`S ~t.,R.l%;sx~xs,a:;~'°v 4 t ~ ',s::3:~',~tiu i^-r ,u~u,.,~~u'' „y r• s', I S a r t, t t Y~R r kA' ,y €V Y J '1 J = 3 'i a 0 1t r y ~ ~ < F ~ ~ y r t ~ ' R t C ~ i k r pp ' 4 i y a~+ !r ~ fir' }t {Ep til r. a ~ ~ G f 3ry 41 JA, i i~f J~~LfaJ fi Fr >ri~ / r ~ E}"~1! Vr~~ as y X tit - - !t, S§~' F$ Fla ~ 5 tsr ~"'~~-.F-.~:r r y~ ~ ,s~, i3 F+ ~ •e7 ; ~ - - Lei E m f l a i'. 6- C F v~ c/~ U m S ff r- a¢.,i } +s.fL lYs fn a4, tx ice., d~{ r~ 3~,y l~`Yb:,s ~b"44r 'r p rs p,_ }s -LE -)h 20M N9 folil a", K"' Cf 4 ,§y"r txFi', ,•ipr x r] a s, A 6 7- _ j`"`,.dt4 'ti x }t a + a -C 's °~ix.a '"-•"="3 .9 `1,, ~:i ? 3 K,xwy s+1nT ~ S.-a^rn •«nn-m'it='. r.,*y, ^'"`."`.'"`yyr•;•+1,mc•; .".'-I. rr< -r,? Yr~ .t. '•t'n - '1` 'f , i i~" vF'~ ii -Y t+" ` d5i°'" rye - a, 1 :r~ _ aXxw 'ti, ' ~ zay it nr ' Y t. a - `;ek'**'fi a r! ,t r > :dr• q'n ° 4 S' i, Wt ~t=: .x ^_',+'i s wC;". 9" vZ•,.. a a.;.sa vf.>;-r„ , a. , n a- a ` a . t •.+i dFi. Mil, x MrF"4• '1 , '3 P +.v -z F : .;+3r.. :-s ,j`' >i e`•} :,a ..~3: '^r`_,..t r i""3'~ ^ ,v.~i - xc . .,.},Nn '+q. n •'a,.w rr.., - ' .r, l`i+.*; x y-xr', . ~ axa. a . ~"fi°, .,i.. >,a,,, ~+~t ,'•'~a :;r .<v~..,i,~.-. ~ is . s;+: .:~hr:. r~r~., _';S.X . C .r ; •.x r. ,,..,.'rCa a? >.'4k'~:S-`t't,'+~ p„ v^r "re4 - .'i~ " r#' 1€~ vrtr..,.. - r:'~'"- n., -k,., .,<-n„p;•n s~z,-; '~vr~ $ a a'!'F7 , •Rr'.. ' .x r" tf 'sna, ~r "t ?q.. ~'r+ a..~ °a°° M ;,t':-^..~ ai-v,7 +'::,rr,- S. .t ~T=r<.:xs ",Y+>§e, `",l`rn•~=~.r' ,."wren" •.14 .E. R 3vF a, ww,r• r a'- Y' , 'Ali .,,.a.,.'r M - [ tr P fin, ~~"y~pNeM~ 5r ~y#rr k ~ ~,1it ~`J k"" b2r ,1?5:4*'_'<iie' J-~+, befin .l d ~..a ~X."+ f .,y ..t; s"•,f1' :d,4 5 , y..'"A S . i . , , c . a= ':%-~r,.: ~•,r~• as %'x . ~r.,"~t^ rn `='~g„ r~r:"• R>e,s k ~ ,rte. ` y SX-.. ik Mi7r~~."'+Y~. ~.'x f' §1 W.-+ x.34' ~;,,Ae ^.h en y .(fir ,xw.J^"- +~F .rr r'.J'ie wrri ~.•ru F,. a4: iiv e i' f 4'r•' $r".-+. viSr~ 1~'. n~`•`c0%k„Y. ..h,. 4a' i'r•"In... .t "s>-. r, ~',m 'm`Yi,*. S'~}a 4S, r„~X n,k. `a dt^ ~3 tti4' _ ~ d A r:w~ , ,'a•x'1., ~ ° a, y , ,'rn , r, r ~'~r-W e _ &s,. e v "-<.~s > r~; ,,,.t.. N a.+T . ..f . ~ KW k H'~~ ni~}~ Ft G.r{,•W.~ u~,',' n^,, YS•x>, m9.t ,;`Lv h A' 3,r✓~5~4.- ~"f4~ tR R,?, ra,. ,-a°^.s.. d ':"a P~y~ r>.t4&-; i. ..ra a2a,~"~^<.c~'"axr, H'•s 7n ^.s ~.,,f~ "~c, ~~~t,.' t,#,x~- xx .Y > ,:s, etrk•.r%",P.• `!tsrX';`"!ve v^"ds J~', 'r?l;yeti ~4.,,a a'§ YT'•r_ , +r'k'Sk" e': ry ».4' 1 .r:.T'a't >sJ ta,.. ,,i`Jir.. i:• .d tw~' .r X r.. .`d. ,~+i .,,'P ,.:1'lt~? . G.a"r»xrwr .,~d xr:7:: '.*i,. F,'y n°;+>~ 3~ ra:k:$` + a' '1 " , aSm~~• l ~2^ - a!. •h,., x 4,:.'~, P.. ~ .i , ~ ,z a, F+ r 1 %kc ,5^ ,:,1:k L„,4': _ o,r3 r,. r 3~„•,5Y '~u""G'c u, st-,y,L.r tr+..^- rtr. ~r '-.as""•n~§i,w ((.4•rt3 .1*G'r 7„ ~~:~:,yyt r:t...- y~.,,`` : F^s~'C"~ 'Y ~yra;~a:, "-u> ,{1 §a~,i<, ;~i~;''a<,, x,r k ,s ~,!':t.,,:.^x'=®r~. .$,k" - ,r ,1 i;., .7. ~x b?..° . ~~'x , -fir',. ~ "r,~:_. "~:'t ,k ~':e'8>' ~ t -~'•1X,~'" _t ;yn, ;.t<.r a ^v~, .e,,,, •..J ','6w .n,~>. n r+" • ~~a, i>rr .''f+,,.l''=k- . ~."a;'. ~ w. "a ,.Xn,:..i tv , > a,_ _ ,r sS"`"':• ' ' ~'s . . ~u i'=+ ~S n3,h .su. y.:,u,=~ ` ,•'i ~ ..x; fi'H "`°e z ?:,r ~„"i ; .4. - -ku... ~ .Y 2•~'A'r7r•~-~,.« x. w.s ,s^ . - ..v ,~y» "~`L,.wrB r:'s 's~_ . r .`,kt, , 1,~."... ra,~ .m 4'>a - S, . „a , .,..a- 'e 4 . ~ YZ,°."-• •<s,,,a rN a ~ _ ~:r,.n ,~z... -d , 1'gxc+,w. - , uC., .>wZ. ,x°. ,x'u'r`•'",;*,>L," 'k.- ~ w" ~i tW:. a 1, . ^ .~~E^c:r-r:'~,>nra x .15`;'„ , , ?5" m G: m#' ~c4d "C{f •;5-'~ ,k > ,..g... t, ter. 'f '.i 7 J'. to r • ~",r , r. „4~ . yr3 A.. -'~S ° rr„ .n 'N°-.. 1:;. ^a,~5+< ,rxr,,,:S' ..gam.; is„,. n i r•1 .1. r'a?15'1? Via". 2. t'~~i` . 9 - ..~r„ •^fi'Y'' ,".+,3r-V H .~'i-•.~+ i.' . , r„t a . i a. " . - , , ` , . ;~,7, ~ . k„ , , 2 ..y : : r •''t ,r c , x•<..,. rY . ,t{ r «,<'< "T. T+~Y .3h1.. ,N- '1. 1 V .\J- .,C, `:Sir "1' .,P•ert"'"~ ,,1.~W',: , ,.:?ail.,.,.. ,ar,.~., . stY'zs-~,,, r . '°S?. :'w..., ,...^°1.ulx .x ,,Y-"~.5a„n'~,r , Y'~„'- _ ..4... , rr..,.+; ,e , a.rc_,.,, 'r?t,'P,,,••i': -<.r. ',t•:`~5'.- ,1~ss . s_ si, ~a 't/~k't Sk M, PER 4", All MCD"N yY~ 3~ tt rsx (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are scheduled to follow- up a Council matter or request.) r# Date: November 19, 1996 ~ MA+ xw a~ a z " + k , , f Type: Workshop (\o TV) it ~ _i''-mac a~~ 6b t. fi - ~C - ZF Start Time: 6:30 p.m. "I t# i v t S x e. ~~s t `ss a- a'i ^s~,rte ~ rf Workshop ?fleeting Topics: > ell C'o m m cation, (Liz) t ' - > Update: Metro 2040 (Jim) AR FIR > geportF , ee Wellness B=ram (Sandy) y > > Public Hearing: Complete Triangle Rezoning and x <q S 4" transpn ation elements (Jim) s > Ream L° ate nMngQ Fe ; Schedule Date for Council U > a c F 13:i11~Clltf4lll (Engineering)+ MA 9, / Y 4NR -n a k a,~r a t a va ~ a~~~Sda~" r t V-x r it{'.P't5-rr 1 3+ t i ~Rd RU - k ~ r - PAJ~ tst7'~ _ M@MW k y,at aK -Y_+ ( s _ _ ro a t 31 1 .+1 .+p r I "21-M, V hri 5" 1 i r" ~X+~ 't -d-`.3-z`rfa w1 r z~--r tgr. 4h^r z~+-t.," -Mn r ~ f r ,r s tr z + i~ z - 1 - v V" 'KI xa - z r a' r-~A.~- a-E _ _ t- s- t - c~ C~°a~ ~s2 ~,.~'.-a•., 5. as-, u y 3~7~~rg`a E~~{ Yc' ~ .z z ~ - i - f F ~3°£~~,s.,•~"r» 7*.w' ~,t~„ . 'mow e I -R XZ1 (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are scheduled to follow- /7.N up a Council matter or request.) t r ` Date: November 26, 1996 ~ ~gW - F-w a , Type: Business (TV)` r Start Time: 6:30 p.m. Study Meeting ~~~r 7:30 m. Business Meeting IT -?M -719 1 = Study Session: > Agenda Reviewer t t Consent Agenda: ~ ~-~#y ; ~ ~ * ~ . > Approve Council Minutes a s; rte" u r Y~" r Business Meeting: k~ gi g, - a'.- -t x- - - t 'fg ant-~ Y L3 3"d - _ _ £ ,YP rM~ ~.F-rva g' ,z,-e'~"~s`F'~ 3k - ~ A•t,~-p>- ':ri~..«-`'use. - c.,,,~ "'z, tell, t - :i „ i a Z~ w, 1A 3-1- - # s - ✓ f 3 PM~ 7 K } y' - 4 n , Mr, g2N -77777 z{6zq;,,"X°`a~',~r•c t E t r t R 7 ~t` yg ` y -FxT S^d a _ r r r `~y70', IF-. "F7 $ ~ - f z•2• ~ a~ - f 3 t - -13a , p }zM 'L$ vsf T ' _ - 4'' kH R~S.,ya ~y. YBT 04 - IM ~UF ~i• it- s'~a,ff e`4r •c L;X OP, ~t` `3? - = y, _c. Y c,Y'y - :0 11, ;x- (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are scheduled to follow- x ; k y r r~ - up a Council matter or request.) b $ a rY t x~ „ z } Date: December 10, 1996 IN e+9 Yv'~ gv~ Business (TV) j _ WPMs sx r , Start Time: 6:30 p.m. Study Meeting t~ t r - v 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting t~ F „a k r Study Session: , .rt Agenda Review a 1y - 4 j Consent Agenda: # r > Approve Council Minutes `y r fl -kr'Y5 - F .#x ~ ..s r Business Meeting: ~s c # > Puplic Hearin Complete 99W Analysis, Adopt Findings and n Design Standards (Jim) gPi, .2i'faG`" F '¢4M 1 - - ~ c x ,P" ass ]rTM;3`y~~' p- ,3' Sk-y l 5. - C "tr ~'s 4g.vCP,~ 44N a¢ 50 0, WIN -A- AVER M E4, Mit- 11 Yk^, a~R~x~'E'F~`".~' IdgAr" ,s~,~_ "X'L"."'~~~:S;r44S> 5fi v ~ dM`.Y'i-..= u.,..,..~..v_. •fiC5 it66.c:e^a - ..s.\a...l:x.S..u. { '....1"V: mrS'~a" .d`5 i~+K" a~ ~h T~F s~sac UZI S, (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are scheduled to follow- up a Council matter or request) 4 , 4 OF- T t s Date: December 17, 1996 ups xrs. t4r b Type: Workshop (No TV) '4 "h.j frEF ys p4_''~.e -j _ Start Time: 6:30 p.m. 4 Y - +Y , f 1 Workshop Meeting Topics: CIT Communications (Liz) a k - > Update: Metro 21)40 (Jim) > Status: Council oats (Bill) a wn z > Report Feasibility of Contracting for Water Meter Readine _ ~ , r x' (Ed)~ F~t~, e1 't 1Ma _ a 7 Vi r [ ? 42 ~q ah.- ~ w,l x §ws~ t k ~S rC° a~ ,x F r r RZ 9 k r ~x, C M%R 1M _i' "f S~ e`' r'c'k S„r' t?}`a•~F 777=7 77,777 ~7,77"7 _ R,~,dty 50 £ Z_M t 1 - 'L, iC ~F d ~'Y ~2 s- a m M, Ag g, SO, V W101 '20, - d'µ' ~}~~.~fi'9 ~pC- r, Y K ~ U 1 x 'S _ _ r ~ ,J^ ,.1 ,i" d 1.cn r k~~,~~'y, ~~i`~~'~ er~&.~,J`s ns c r t 1 - ~ r r v _ r, - ~,~"ykf7r~c e ti • - -T.'cz~~' 'ate 3} Ytf,,~•2~i _ ^c! .-r,-.,'",4,."'s}g.,~ re, ss r"n _'z - ti r, ,•.tf t 4 = e ~}y3~ 5~,- . s '"b~YA~~~` § i- - - ~ e..,.~. - sY... ~ 7..,.1~........._ r ( ~ k w : -t F v~e~5~f{'T^+ b~"~t' ~ f J <ya ~ ark, *9 4 {c Z~11 - W'`~ 0 (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are scheduled to follow- } up a Council matter or request.) I_"- MZROS~ Da' te: ds December 24, 1996 i0y RRIXISA, t Ty - pe: Business (TV)s' CANCEL MEETING: CHRISTMAS EVE....` t r- }~F a X1'13 k`x a. -i t Z' J;_~~ ~ ~ c~ 1„tn ~ Asa r rSt a zn. I-, itF ,r~"ax_'.r,~.y~xti,, tS - 3es' y3-¢Y ya.,"s~• J~ r F e; G k7, `Nz VN~` jfi~g re 3,8 + s' a A a`'S''-Fret,' 'fit? &r,...7, a`i !C St'f`Xy5 7 - .IvT`A -F'TZSS'hS" ? dq M~; ,L '`C ry#>. ,rod a lC s veydx { _ j a t _ - s r -"i' yy 3 f ,m E n"M 1. £y-~`~-' _*v'F.E, {may. PC~Y - t b y 4 4 t l >4^- tt, Srp~r '`l s6 .c*' 4 ' t -i-L^ rte, k L R1111~~"'~ r s k ry,:,r 'm'om-t.--`r:Y'`s-3 Lr'" xr- _ _ " . - . 3.,,... y - n e 4 ~ma i 1 11 j-, I F111 " - , ~ ~ , N- x;7 d,,a rT-z t t _ 5i -h - _ ° `ice-' ;2 , `'x - r _ y t F - 4 ~ - t -4-Y'eCaAY§ ^'1~`; .YV ~ - _ _ t.-`.- +Ei+ ~-s~S -A ~i'F'- F n _ , I WT ~'i u'i,~' P F' - -„aaccESUS:.u - - =-.....c.._ ......n h_ k2 > a . amp - ' t ip r a w T ny 7 ITEMS PENDING -DATES TO BE SCHEDULED 5 , ' ' x r a _ M • Finalize Long Range Plan -Cook Park (Bill, Jim) ~I - - Z .tea„ w: - k '€'t , { transportation Comprehensive Plan Changes (Jim) /"'"N tb - ~ ~ 7, s, + y - • Surface Water Quality Treatment Facilities -Staff Report on information - q k r c Requested by Council on September 1995 (Engineering Dept.) { 1~ : e ~ ~'o~ OPEU Contract Negotiations - approval of new contract (Sandy) - F r N ~ 7 COMPLETED ~ Y, g' ,a ~Y ? m s 11. - • Dartmouth LID Financing Hearing (Gary, Wayne) _ ~ • Items to be scheduled after City Vision Statement process is completed by g <s i ~ `t - ? k:. `z Council: ~ > > • Half Street Improvement Policy n ineerin L I I F z ` January 1997: • Develop Annexation Policy; especially for island areas (Jim) , r- I Integrate Council into Computer System (Paul DeBruyn) - a rY d • Develop Long-Term Water Resources (Ed, Bill)" '~s`~ ~pm • Review City's Street-Light Policy (Engineering) R~~~ ' • Schedule Council Goal Setting Session , r k June 1997: rg , V. i ~ a " 1- " • Rewrite Tigard Development Code - Buffering (Jim) -VV 17W. ` s z'r i Eneineerin ees (Engineering Dept.)M, • Finalize Visioning Process - Implement (Liz, Loreen) c 0 Evaluate Use of Traffic Calmim Devices - S.W. North Dakota ~ ?"T • Finalize Sewer Extension Program (Engineering) (Engineering) F s-~ ~ i Ongoing (as needed) I fL.-F f • Consider Issues of Affordable Honcing i ~ ~ k t.° J r i • Support Passenger Rail Service Planning through Tigard W • Define/Develop Tigard'c Approach to Working ling with Metro , A~ 2t- f i • Secure Long-Tenn Water Supply ` EF r 1 ~.'s E,- 1 a y` s k P i -{r { € ¢ ti's by ' x i Note: a CIT facilitators and resource teams meet with Council for 1 hour at the work session , rl' p ; F s+ meetings in January, April and September. t 3 L _0 R = z ` fff All Workshop Meetings - schedule a time for CIT updates and Metro 2040 Updates. , ; x i f w ; - f:VOglnlcathYltmla6en _ _ J r " aS 4` A%- ,Rr, i err-.r, 2'~J2 ytiu' F {-Y a s - \i rs it ~p ~ , -Y ' n`F - '-.rte ~ffF? -rt - r - F[ 1 yf Y r - i t-- - ! - } - tj, 1 &F, r E t 5 1 s;x a. 'ry, t o , $ f . - " L2 _ _ ~ ~ , , : - r ~ ! ' ' ' ~ - ~ ' _ t p - G _ - - st 'jai s-s a s I,§ s.. q r r Y f, _ I ~ , , , . - - - I , , H k r, ~ , n 6X rr , r ~ F i a fi y' ~"y1 C L _ - _ _ 4 e - ~ / T AGENDA ITEM # 3. 3 w C0~P013:.t^~> q For Agenda of August 13, 1996 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY a f 1 f ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE e.-+ce^•r^Mf-r--t n of the Ma'n StreetiCommer ial Street R onctru tion Proiect ar r x PREPARED BY: GG Alfson DEPT HEAD OK _ CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE O N II 4, E ~ r Y Award the contract for construction of the Main StreetlCommercial Street Reconstruction Project to the low bidder and ;t authorize the City Administrator to sign the contract documents. w 5 4 MEE RECOMMENDATION r y 4y r' ArJaku the contract to the low bidder, Benge construction with the understanding that additional funds will be required to _ supplement the budget 0 j INFORMATION St IMM Ry 44 * z, s s Reconstruction of Main Street and Commercial Street is required due to the deteriorated condition of the pavement on both r s qtr - streets. The project limits on Main Street are from the Fanno Creek Bridge to 99W and from Scoffins Street to 99W. The j project limits on Commercial Street are from Main Street to Hall Blvd. Reconstruction of the pavements will require closure of r_ y I!J Main Street from Scoffins to 99W and of Commercial Street from Main to the Tri-Met Transfer Center. The adjacent businesses and Tri-Met have been notified of the closures and are in favor of the project The southwest end of Main Street require half width closures and the elimination of parking during construction, similar to last year's reconstruction project Commercial Street portion of the project will also include pavement widening and the construction of curb and sidewalk. Tfiis will complete the improvements to Commercial Street for pavement widening and curb and sidewalk. Both streets will ' FY` ~C f also include upgrades to the storm drainage system. On August 13th bids two bids were opened. Bid results areas follows: s3 Benge Construction Co, Tualatin $578,523.00 Morse Bros, Sherwood $695,777.00 , The Engineer's estimate was $495,000. & _ &ZAP ~ t The budget allocated $560,000 for this project Engineering fees are estimated to total $25,000. Therefore j ~ exceeds the budget by $43,523. Modifications to the Scoffins signal was included into this project and was bid $5 ,200!d k 10 Funding for this work was proposed to be from the signal and street light maintenance budget The cost for the storm drainage improvements is $11,000 over the budgeted amount and additional funding is available from the SDC account This leaves a deficit of $27,323. There are three options available for this project. One is to award the project as is and to i eliminate a project from the 96/97 CIP Gas Tax list. There are no projects that I would recommend we delete. A second t would be to award the project as is, acknowledging that the project will exceed the budget and that Gas Tax funding will need ! y r to be allocated from the 97/98 budget. A third would be to reduce the scope of the work by the deficit amount This would- - possibly include elimination of sidewalks, or a portion of the pavement reconstruction. I do not recommend this option as this would result in increased costs in the future to complete the work. The fourth option would be to reject all bids and readvertise the project in the Spring. v a k OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ~ FISCA LNOTE Funding for this project is designated in the 1996/97 Capital Improvement Program as 5460,000 from Gas Tax revenues and $100,000 from the Storm Drainage SDC. $5,200 for the modifications to the Scoffins traffic signal will come from the Traffic I ~al/Streedight maintenance budget - T i 1 f '°c b 4t - j P- - - Y g x LE. 'L § EAI-m$ ~_3n-1 T t - - r4 9F F '"-lh 1 ~l - b I - C` s 1 "f.9t$sCWR4 . ouur _..,:.L~,ds-a as _ w..maa.bn...uu~n.,.ass,i„s,..,.,:__... l ~ 4♦ $ ~ .11 T \ i4; f - y -t - L Y S - ~~_7n- r I [ ~ . , - 1 f _ , T } ~ 4..'- a . AGENDAITEM# 3.30. ' For Agenda of August 13. 1996 , J CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON r - " - > c'a COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY F , 4 F'. x..-L....__ E' _2' I _ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award contract for construction of the Main Street/Commercial Street Reconstruction Protect ° ° n , q 2.7 ; ; i f k.. k 2 .'y PREPARED BY: G Aifson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK tPo x : ; ' t T 11 ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL z I Award the contract for construction of the Main Street/Commerclai Street Reconstruction Project to the low bidder and authorize F : } i x 4 " the City Administrator to sign the contract documents. ° - k -Z K - 11i'4 -1 - -z ~ .u y ~g .x 'i - ' + STAFF RECOMMENDATION F"`'_"'-~- s Recommendation will depend upon bid results obtained August 13th. ' - ' f a t } INFORMATION SUMMARY % 'k F a -'J-'y . I'~~ F'~',_-,-~I~ ~'W,k_ -1. - Reconstruction of Main Street and Commercial Street is required due to the deteriorated condition of the pavement on troth' a streets. The project limits on Main Street are from the Fanno Creek Bridge to 99W and from ScofFins Street to 99W. The ' 3 _ ` Nr project limits on Commercial Street are from Main Street to Hail Blvd. Reconstruction of the pavements will require closure of s r + ' "'/lain Street from Scoffins to 99W and of Commercial Street from Main to the Tri-Met Transfer Center. The adjacent r_ ' % 4 ~ . ~ finesses and Tri-Met have been notified of the closures and are in favor of the project. The southwest end of Main Street will ; : , u z t X require half width closures and the elimination of parking during construction, similar to last year's reconstruction project. The 't'f ° ` f -4 Commercial Street portion of the project will also include pavement widening and the construction of curb and sidewalk. This Y ; , ~ r will complete the improvements to Commercial Street for pavement widening and curb and sidewalk Both streets will also > include upgrades to the storm drainage system. , W r -s t' On August 13th buts will be opened for the construction. Bid results will be available 6:00 PM at the Council Study session. } s~ The Engineer's estimate is $495,000. ' OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED '.'iN > a FISCAL NOTES 2f~+- zsr Funding for this pmroect is designated In the 1996!97 Capital Improvement Program from gas tax revenues. - I r€_ ' . ~ r C ; t 4 ~ Tr FF h T i i 3 n a Yt r y g .s y 1 r t s r - r i S ` s f I ' r } C v r lq 4 - ` F _ J p ; c r Y f r 3- q." C J a { I' y 'S' y I; F YZ k t Y + C J 1 " - - j - y' - - A - - - - Ji - 4 'v - S J - 4 L# } f f -r... _ ~r _ _ - _ _ _ . N: r ; u~ s I', " , ~ 1. " ~ . - - ,.177] - - c - Y Fem.}s c,- -i- ` 21 p" ~z~y R Y S_ - yt I 1 3iF k~.Cir"dE:eS_ Y,+ t r - k_P t - S 4 {a ,FSt, )IN , _ ^..~b.sKa.vB'Ys - ns.umz. ar..as..sw:ra5"iu~.JrYrsY.uadra:,.. f X T,.'r 4` xm ~ a , ~ Y t y - r D s 3,3b Cavfs- r -k c AGENDA ITEM # / .1 ` { {T ffi -F 1 For Agenda of August 13, 1996 'h v a { y y j CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ,f COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ,Z., „ , ISSUEIAGENDA TITLE Award contract for construction of the 1996 Pavement Major Maintenance Program - PREPARED BY: AI DEPT HEAD OK _ CITY ADMIN OK _ ` s ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL t a ~r#-` Award the contract for construction of the 1996 Pavement Major Maintenance Program to the low bidder and authorize the, s City Administrator to sign the contract documents. n e tg J r STAFF RECOMMENDATION t - *r x5 t i Award itr6 contract to the !ow bidder, Kerr Contractors, with the agreement that 68th Avenue and Cascade Blvd will be r L~ _ eliminated from the list of streets. z r~ - _ INFORMATION SUMMARY r-r ti TM-'1 11 Z t 57 fit The Pavement Major Maintenance Program is an annual program of overlays and structural digout repairs to maintain the f i i ' ~ City's asphalt pavements. This year the streets include 135th Avenue, 68th Avenue, Gaarde Street, Cascade Blvd, r ~ , - Greenburg Road, Alfred Street, and 74th Avenue. See the attached list for additional information. On August 13th four bids a ~I k ? ~ ~ £ ~ K 4 were opened. The bid results are as follows: , „ ZM . + r t 1-1 s- ~ Kerr contractors, Tualatin $355,769.00 ~ Wi t{ Oregon Asphalt Paving, Portland $390,721.00 ~ Morse Bros, Sherwood 5405,887.00 j ~ - J% z Benge Construction, Tualatin $412,033.90 Ls~ia ~H WF*~~r- The Engineer's estimate was $300,000. 1 - ~ , , - - - va . The low bid exceeded the available budget by $65,000. There are three options available for this project One would be to k improve all the streets as listed and reduce funding from other projects available for Gas Tax revenues. A second would be 11 , -1 ` to reduce the amount of work to match the available funding. The third would be to reject all bids and readvertise the project , r in the Spring. 1 recommend that we award the project with the understanding that the project list would be reduced by 68th _ ys ~ Avenue and Cascade Blvd. I have spoken with the contractor and he is willing to do this. There are no other 96/97 CIP ~ ;;Lx~, ' 1 projects funded from Gas Tax revenues that I would recommend that we eliminate in favor of the Pavement Major I Maintenance Program or paving Alfred Street and 74th Avenue. I do not recommend that the project be delayed until next , } ~ year. Even though the unit prices are higher than what would be expected in the Spring, the deterioration that would occur- x 1 h - over the ""Inter would result in more preparation required and less structural strength left in the pavement This additional , M cost as a result of the deterioration would offset the higher unit costs. ,t' 1 OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED r #kt sr #s E T, FISCAL NOTES If a` ; 'Ef Funding is designated in the 1996/97 Capital Improvement Program from Gas Tax revenues in the combined amount of Yc r fi l $290,000 for the Pavement Major Maintenance Program and for paving Alfred Street and 74th Avenue. c = s K { tj 1 zg „ ! r - s p , E ' -a f'_?c 4~ t F t i `1- y ;Y t M1-- 3 E 4,5,x'- "'x 1 - -F i F ,.Y+a'S~: ¢'++nmxr ~•r.:..m':#'iu'*t`Ka fi+- - - _ _ _ _ "'y'^^"-- T r"F'~ 1 C- Ls - - Ne;' - - ,p j - { I- - - j_ P h d,A - - f - `Sx4 3~' I c,- rx f _ { M1 7f f 1 5 K P- _ _ S F ~'_S F C 1. rY Y - -Y J J I- e - fi F W i ; ' j ry.F`- d f t 1_I 4 r I I K7- R t - S Y $ ~ t-. M s. •..,,'r t - - >"y - - ` - - i 3 * ! c .t -any - 11 R ails. ,,x, I _ .w.~mas. x,e ..,°as .3, ,..~...I I =io;' a 'WE , LL" Y f f r ~ ~ J 4 } , .j _ t AGENDA ITEM # 3.3 b £ "S ~ C - z r For Agenda of August 13. 19% ~ kLW',, L a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON - - gx COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY' y, ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE ward contract for construction of the 1998 Pavement Ma'or Maintenance P ram 1-1-11 fi r x PREPARED BY: G Alfson DEPT HEAD OK _ CITY ADMIN OK 3- R - 1 Jt Y'A- ~ S- , 3 - # -RS-~~, - 8 a" s _ r ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL s - ` % ry t a r - - Award the contract for construction of the 1998 Pavement Major Maintenance Program to the low bidder and authorize the City L a } i ~ Administrator to sign the contract documents. F , STAFF RECOMMENDATION , t k N~ z - i y 'xt U- xy } - °exmme,w " iri!! dcperw' ripen ulu' iCJii1W obtained ' August 13uL ~e s }Y? 1- 170-3 _ <r 'fa,u'w INFORMATION SUMMARY r -=~c=-- - - = fix,. 7 - ~ The Pavement Major Maintenance P x ' ~ a Program is an annual program of overlays and structural d(gout repairs to maintain the City's r' a ~ asphalt pavements. This year the streets include 135th Avenue, 68th Avenue, Gaarde Street, Cascade Blvd, Greentwrp Road, ` F Alfred Street, and 74th Avenue. See the attached list for additional information. On Augur 13th bids will be opened. Bid r M~,Z~ z' , F r-7esu0s will be available 6:00 PM at the Council Study session. , 11 nIhe Engineers estimate is $300,000. X~; r~i~ OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 3 i u . - ' s -1 r FISCAL NOTED' k t C' n~ v - Y ~ Y ~ { Funding is designated in the 1996/97 Capital Improvement Program from Traffic Impact Fees. ~ , ~ l -5 € _ t f ~I ' # - i~ r r f { - g z "r' 5 a a W b r r 11 t 4 F ~ - .mot i ° x F 11 a" xR -*-,z !fit E 4,,, S y t i c; [rF N - a - - r ' , Y3- F - a, r ez 11 . f - + ?k a { t f# '1; - ~ 1 y r s r y~ h F r i ~K y t a - ¥A r 4 - { Y ~ ~ , 'J ~ , 7 ~ ~ . r, ~ . , I , _ ~ r ~ J ~7",'~',"'i~"~~,,; c- f r Y^, ii e 3 r - f J' 1 q ,1 x k Ty r T J 1 h4 'ii, 1t+ - J _ - t t t y - - - _t J'- Y t EN~ J r ZM==: 'F - - r k t ! . v- _ - - c r S ~y 7+ yS. ~ r °ir, 1Y I Y'. rtfrz. k'4 , Nu to ~5, n 1. - I, r r t ,^<.t!Y,. ":d- _ Fr~„.2+.,u... v, gu.,:Y? 4 "RA 't c , '`i . L _ , i irt:~', .•~":.:s5 „Cr';t:' • tr d "OV ✓'h. -A' 1-' r`=':'~: rr..^. h~°i ,F. ' ur.,r.M.n, tY °k:fl• r pj, r - ~ 4-• a .r A. i= y,~;x ~ a s1, sr n i} _ 1 4 - S;]EE~ ! ,µ.'..t~• 1 w, -n,r*er ~r~: 'k r L i3 17 . /6/96 l ui 1996 PAVEMENT MAJOR MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: a' PROJECT ROAD LIMITS LENGTH WIDTH AREA DEPTH OVERLAY FABRIC DIGOUT NOTES: + # FT. FT. S.Y. IN. TONS S.Y. S.Y. I 1 68TH AVENUE 66TH TO S/0 HAMPTON 900 40 4,000 2.00 450 200 1 2 74TH AVENUE S/0 BONITA TO N/0 DURHAM 4,300 22 10,5111 3.00 1,774 2 + 3 135TH AVENUE SCHOLLS TO WALNUT 3,600 40 16,000 3.50 3,150 9,600 50 3 4 ALFRED STREET VENTURA TO 70TH 1,050 22 2,567 3.00 433 4 5 CASCADE BLVD GREENBURG TO HONDA/YAMAHA 1,250 36 5,00D 3.00 844 3,600 100 5 1 6 GAARDE STREET 110TH TO CITY LIMITS 800 28 2,489 2.75 385 670 6 d , s 7 GREENBURG ROAD AT 99W AND 95TH N/A WA 0 225 7 . 8 TIEDEMAN AVENUE AT NO. DAKOTA WA NIA 0 10 8 . TOTALS 40,567 7,036 14,070 385 NOTES 1 1.5" OLAY AT CURB, 12'X150' FABRIC 2 SCARIFY, SHAPE CROWN AND RECOMPACT GRAVEL LEAVE 1' TO 2' GRAVEL SHOULDER,PULL SHOULDER UP TO TOP 01: AC 3 2-12' FABRIC FULL LENGTH, 4'X100' DIGOUT 4 SCARIFY, SHAPE 1/4 CROWN AND RECOMPACT GRAVEL, LEAVE 1' TO 7 GRAVEL SHOULDER' ` ADDITIONAL 3/4" ROCK(30CY) AND 30' OF AC BERM REQUIRED AT 70TH, PULL SHOULDER TO TOP OF AC 5 PRELEVEL REQUIRED, 2-12' FABRIC FULL LENGTH, DIGOUT ACROSS FRANZ DRIVEWAY, AC BERM AT OFFICE DEPOT f t 3 DRIVEWAY, DELETE WEST HALF OF STREET 500' FROM NORTH END, SHOULDER ROCK REQUIRED 4 I 6 PRELEVEL REQ'D, 2-12'X250' FABRIC, 3.5' FROM 110TH TO DIP, 25" FROM DIP TO CITY LIMITS, SHOULDER ROCK REQ'D, ADJUST CB IN DIP Ff r 7 DIGOUTS AT 99W 6' MIN WIDTH, REPLACE 2 SIGNAL LOOPS, PRESERVE AND PROTECT CONDUIT, 5'X300' DIGOUT AT 95Th I 4 8 V WIDTH DIGOUTS J s: n ~ 96pmmp Page 1 ^ 7777777777777' 777 -T7 6 i w r SCI z a d ,,1P P•,I !n r, d j 777 -l 114 t -1 `a'`,r g ' ;jyj 3 ,f t<k'xv ."v ca? 1 r - My f l ''t n i W ~.a -W 7- 3. 1 1' :^`itr Mr. r A r kr. 2, 1 ~ : YI" . Y+ V •.t C - .JS. i F x .>A t S 5% t , rm t f f I ,:h r 1® ` ii I r ' it x sit I r. I 1. kj', -0 9..'I', i11 - 1' ''I 7.1 ± 'J f -~Pf Inc ! 1 If d~ P I fro Il T`'I 'd _ 6 , I1 o nr~ ;~1_I:. 1 - J ! ,~4 .S1"iil~H{,F j ,I l+ i Y CI'....:. 1,....~ . . I,r ~ Ch :1 .J: 1^ T,:;; i; l1 t 1 1. - . t4k'T N"# 3"-S t MM f - 4 - Y x Br 3 , t 4 t- x P r n~""~ 4 r1 r x, .-c r a r3 k r ~ a.;?..:if , , - ` z n` - '1Nt'v ~ r, -d } h r - `T to a ` 3 AGENDA ITEM # 3.' + a ` n' zr i t j For Agenda of ~i/13 tJ ! ~ - ` i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON - k't ; ti ~ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY k z s a f7 - a a ' ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Historic Application Fee Waiver Request , K a < s - T- , PREPARED BY: D. Roberts DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK WO i ^ F ki cc_ ' -e t ki ---r - - - k ' ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL a H x - Should the City grant a request by the Tigard Chamber of Commerce to waive the required fee for the submittal of F an application to demolish the Tigard Feed and Garden building? z tiCiti ° STAFF RECOMMENDATION " ~1 k 3 q - Grant the request. L I r r ~ . INFORMATION SUMMARY -Si" , 'a -'The chamber and the ci recentl have ac uired the roe on °`'4= g gti< 1_ tY Y q p p rty which the Tigard Feed and Garden building is _ , u; M1s, - - located. The chamber now owns the building, having acquired it from the Johnson family. The building was i. ' ~ ~ " 1. . ` ~ lIZ-4t, 0 , designated in 1986 as historically significant to the city because of its association with a variety of colorful owners 1 - ~ { n and as the only wood frame building on Main Street. The building has deteriorated over the years and presently is I , ~ - t very poor condition. As a condition of the land sale, Burlington Northern has required that the building be P ,g ar ! (loved away from the railroad tracks. The chamber has explored options and determined that building removal is -~nl3 y~ s 7 the only economically feasible option. As such, the chamber has submitted a request to allow the demolition of the£~ } 3T f building on the basis of economic hardship. The required fee for this type application is $2,190. .1 1- The chamber has asked that the fee be waived. The code allows the director to waive application requirements, of °^k~ F which the application fee is one. The justification for this request is that 1 the ci 15 i granting ty is co-owner of the , - ~ property and, in effect, would be paying a fee to itself, and (2) the chamber is a private non-profit organization _`6"t , . '-~'~-'.~"'~7' , T _ ~7 whose activities benefit the city. , ~ h OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED P. e Impose the full or a partial fee. kr~'r s ~w FISCAL NOTE - C z j I - az i < t Granting the waiver would mean a revenue loss of $2,190. As co-owner of the property, the city could be expected ' K k r~ r to pay a share of the fee. Therefore, the revenue actually lost would be less than the full amount of the fee. 3t -A "'E I ~f f z A ":1 kkitywiMswi\histfee Y x„ -,E 2i 1 1 i' - - -S.. f i' d - i i - - f . r t - - '~s h s4 y 'i- Y } - x„ f S Tr t 1 i, ..^^wixss: -e' rsr }w, e... ASS 'E 'h r - _ _ - y 5 A 7 4 7 mkv t- e T3,: r. -F s - F F y f - C $ # - ,E - - _ try a b'k ha Z a' u1 y4 1 Z C - _ i 3V 1 J "I ~i _ S 4:-? L t 5 _ - 7- ~y-n _~1 rte' f f ~.~.-.-.._..~-ate - . Y.~ . Ll ;L* 1 7_7 1 _ -r~T r._~._.~ .ter.. i.~ A4 "L ) ZM' - Man air Y., s, 8 t 3 _ _ ? 'Y J - C .,3f .fl; 9 is 'Y3~1 gj~°i~.i 2q c,"{y.~'#~'` a„ad Yt ~_a <3 f t_, rt°`a•"-o,xsltaP'a-w, `sT •'"e - 4. i N - a" W4 Z 4x s$ a~. ? s yrf _ Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce s MN- #r u p 12420 SW Main St. ; Tigard, OR 97223w 639-1656 f n z tt0, sr Y Y a k max Ly.+4s.' krs'5,."~iri5 :7"- M50 r July 17, 1996 kN t 1 yc", '?+'AY 7a ~d F ¢ , City Counsel r City of Tigard a > Fx 13125 SW Hall Blvd. - 4 Tigard, OR 97223;. Enclosed please find our Sensitive Lands Application for removal of a Historical Overlay District. ° s 7h _ We are asking a waiver of the $2,190 fee for this application. We are a non-profit corporation set ` up for the benefit of the businesses of the City of Tigard. This site will house the chamber office and visitors center for the City. The back portion of the property is owned by the City and will be ~ f yj~ r used for a parking lot to enhance the central business district and merchants around that location. y~~ # If you have any questions, please call John L. Cook at 590-2933., E Sincerely, x g r - Colleen Willis < President a a~ t a tM & r "MN q eT f r s a,5r a~x 2~ L A F k tt - ai s Wzr'cy,'-.,Y- [ s'p'a?a i fir t - e 4 er 3 r{ t1 4fi- t it _ '~'•'1TMi;~ti xw 2~" F i~~'3is ~GY~'~ TT'~Y i'~,"']:k. - .e3 S,,Y' 3.3 Z 77777777 -sr rk t 3 y s _ &x Ki s -s - - ' t ems- s r S pia Y i * - e' - x t P fr'y`` t rja M., f ~ p ra -`f K mC C - - . i - kY h - c - - - - - . > y.......~...., x R Y. ~ g [ 7 ~ AGENDA ITEM # { For Agenda of 8/13/96 - - r; CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON y ' COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY i y e - " - - - q ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Acceptance of Transfer of Jurisdv_tian of a Portion of Duiliam Road from the Oregon w ` t Depaiuneni of Transportation (ODOT) f S ~ . 4 rt PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan DEPT HEAD OK t Y " ~v ~CITYADMIN OK 1i41*^' ISS r'~ BEFORE THE OUNCIT. c - a 'uu Acceptance of a portion of Beaverton-Tualatin Highway (Durham Road) between SW Hall Blvd. and Boones ..t. ~r H} ' Ferry Road. .d STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Mayor to sign the Abandonment and Retention Agreement prepared by ODOT, accepting =";1 > jurisdiction of this portion of the Beaverton-Tualatin Highway. g` 4= INFORMATION SUMMARY s z ` Over the past year, staff has been working with ODOT staff to work out details to accomplish the transfer of this a s v .portion of State highway to the City. This portion of Durham Road has been part of the State highway system' * V F i' 'nce construction in the mid to late 1960's with Federal funds. It is presently being upgraded by Washington i sr F~ i County, using MSTIP funds. The City will be responsible for all traffic control signals, including the intersections,` f E } of Hall/Durham and Boones Ferry/Durham, as well as all future signal equipment indicated on the roadway > - section. It is necessary that the City have jurisdiction over the road in order to have a traffic control device installed at 79th and Durham. ODOT will not allow a signal here while the road is under its jurisdiction. The F project will be complete by the end of October, with the bridge work and paving complete by August 31. Transfer ' of jurisdiction will take place after the project is complete. y P' 4 I OTHER A T RNATIV (1N4ir7FRFn ' L 1. Take no action, leaving jurisdiction over the road with the State of Oregon, preventing the possibility of a traffic 1r y E 2 S f 4t 5 Lt 7 signal at 79th and Durham Road. i FISCAL i40TES o ..._1 ` Once the road is transferred to the City of Tigard, the City will be responsible for maintenance, street sweeping, , r- striping, street lights, and signal energy costs. The estimated annual costs of these functions are as follows: Street Lights r $3,487 per year Energy Costs for Two Traffic Signals (at Hall/Durham and at Hall/Boones Ferry) $3,240 t~ Maintenance of the Two Signals $5,000 F Street Striping - $1,700 -Compact Storm Water Filter I` _ r Total: $14,827 - more on next page - ~ ~ • 1 4 1 t r° y P 3 fV ,p. yZ Y° h g 4 r Y ~I 1 ~ ~ I F y ~I w r . 1, I- - S,. -s . c , 'rS aj ik'.'t`}~ 'si'c s - t - - }`~yv,i 5}2 ' -fin _ _ Mr- `'4; -fi„ 1 i 1-1 11 i:~~ y-~~Y"4 m3 3 t t m "A A5 7;- q<.~ L c - _ - tr n- 1 ~£~~w~~ ;.-fit-P } i ` - - _ - - t- - x~.._,..a~l _a_. ....5` si.t Lit t'w i 3,.,- n' dq - - y.- }'a'rt. ~"r - , --p-,14- i J _ 'a 5k -itc - -L { f: 3 kIdtreet sweeping and striping will be handled as part of the Public Works Department's regular programs. Street E! f light costs for the 29 lights is: , ~ a x t- ' z - S .p>.llhiloa... 1. ..VV 1lIli1lRareS (27) - $252.45 _ - $ -8 1` - 4 .7, I $6.60/month for 100 W lu_minazes (2) = 13.20 F ' ~ ~ _ ' t ,5 $2.77/month for street light poles (9) = 24.93 - $290.58 r - a 5 , h x 12 ~ 7g z,` x iz x y G P ^nual Energy & Maintenance $3,486.96 s r „ Responsibility for maintenance of the traffic signals, street and street lights is a new cost to be assumed by the City }t - _ a 11 upon transfer of jurisdictian. ~ , -tea ` 0 z 4-- z+e, a 4 1 No additional gas tax revenue will come to the City for acceptance of this segment of road because gas tax 'r P. t, xF'} revenues are distributed on a per capita basis. p. , - - -r - 1' Y ~ ~:t a.s}-tint, 'E. `'f, ' g., r s_ u,.y s ti 1 , t w 5 / € jw -5.k, b Y yu I -7 i 4 c a ! S'hz,'"y.~''' I 1,r.. S5-- _ 3 - $ - F - r k' y F ? Y Pik Y L S~ b i'4 - tti Imo'`` ,j I z I Q h t a e e 3,> - E x 4~ I` Y A - a'.A4 - Y rr~tfi t d, > _ ~7 ~~'4 r -1 s r Er i - v` 2- r - -r - -s ?F I yes 2 J I _ J X .tv°l, ba( s3 1" ' t t 4 N3P } 11 ~ # # - r 1 ' tQ _ ' ^r e'L. . 2 x - ' y _ i ~ dti _FV' e-`r 7 5 3- f~ 5 !t Y 'A.' _ , - F - S ay fay K 1_ 3 i* ; yam L a ,uy y a m> 7 r i.-' .M f r t - i4 yr' d +"d .t' "'§'~'3?7'1-- I t-Y t _ t~, 4{ r{ ' ti✓< rA{~ s {j _ s - t , 1-"-'~ , - Y " . 7T~~' ~ . : I - I I ~ ~ - ~L `V : IMF- ' , - _ - - C' Sv `f ' AGENDA ITEM # /i31ac~ For Agenda of # r*LS~ ~k7 -i - r [ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON -;c { COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY n ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE An ordinance amendinaa chapter 7 32 Offenses v x a i AcTainst Public Order d' PREPARED BY: Capt. Schrader DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCTL -k Should Chapter-7_32-of-the Tigard Municipal Code be amended. ~ tw t } STAFF RECOMMENDATION g n r _ _ y rTr Staff recommends approval of amendment as proposed. ° INFORMATION SUMMARY This proposal would amend Section 7.32.125 to bring the Code in compliance with State law and to remove the requirement for the City of Tigard to issue unconcealed weapons permits to private security officers. This amendment allows private security officers to be armed only if the have a concealed weapons permit issued in accordance with State statutes. This reduces theCity' s liability exposure for giving Ji+ + a permit to a person that has not demonstrated proficiency with a 'y `{f A Q a Z weapon. t i This proposal would amend Section 7.32.130 to bring in compliance with ! State statutes. + - This proposal would delete Section 7.32.140. This is a duplicate of s z ORS 166.280.E F k t This proposal would amend Section 7.32.150 to add bow and arrow and crossbow to the list of unlawful weapons. E rr X155 ~ ~ OTHER ALTERNATIVES. CONSIDERED Do not amend Chapter 7.32.E t , r s t FT A NOT . _ F No Fiscal Impact. k [f t y, 7 ~ r F P x .1 Jx ~ F "4 5 2 J / ; 9 k t ~ S k ~ f a m~ „Y r. ~ zr t i... p t_ G'i t ~ b [ _ - - f ~~F 1] A ' } ` I Nj^ 1 - E•Y ~ ~ N .a t - r t a f E 1 t~ f 1 E Y x F R S i I ~ s~"~- ! s t -4F - ems'"_~,^ Ng"n 7 x AGENDA ITEM # For Agenda of _ Aft~ r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON > y -rv COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY t ~ Ya _ . t } ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Revision of Chapter 5.10 of the Tigard £ Municipal Code r J c PREPARED BY: r=nr `adDEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK - - TSSLTF BEFORE THE COUNOTL { r„ Y Should Chapter 5.10 of the Tigard Municipal-Code-be amended. xt STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this amendment. t 1NFOpMATIQ R 2%RY rt r _ - This proposal would amend Section 5.10.070 to permit the Chief. ofF Police to investigate employees of a licensed private detective or merchant police for the purpose of determining whether the license' r should be continued. _ n This proposal would amend Section 5.10.110 to reference the correcta~ section of the code prescribing penalties for violation of the code. °d ~ r. -Y _ ? ~6 7 f r``-, -s_f` ~l OTHER ALTERNATTVE0 CONSIDERED Do not amend. v lj FISCAL NOTES ~r6 k No fiscal impact. na r ~ r- ~ ~ ~ w s,kx t~ t ~ 7 - .S~ -.3 S - y 1' yt+ 1 1y t _ aSn e~ L d 1 j- £ G~ y J 5 S q.i~r FF il` kx SL~~ J1 f t3Zd r r n ~kk t.} r t - rk t F ?'7 7. 7 7t7 It - - t L j"fGk .iL .5 - - 'Ef f'k'V} j d 1! V0 Le t--,4v : ak . u}.ssr.s - '+J' S~ -FFa3~~,'C Z'f R. ~5'~1• rt2'g1 Z Y - -Xi Mi- F a '~.yc { Y y AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF qCD R-3 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON nj k COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY t -I roly anni g Designations r ; a ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Ordinance Adopting! Annexed P~el PREPARED BY: Ray Valone -DEPT HEAD OK .412 CITY ADMIN OK l ISSUE BFFORL'. THE COUNCIL t § ? - Lim ar - Should the City Council approve an ordinance to assign planning designations to properties that have annexed i F} g ` k - to the City? STAFF RECOMMENDATION } {Y° ` I It is recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed Comprehensive Plan and/or zoning designations - °r i ?h4 si through the approval of the attached ordinance. 010 INFORMATION SUMMARY L'F` tx" - The subject properties have been previously annexed to the City through the direct action of the Boundary p 3 ? Y r Commission. It is now necessary to adopt the required ordinances to assign the appropriate Plan and/or zoning r 6 4 designation as outlined in the Urban Planning Area Agreement between Washington County and the City. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED -'g R Do not adopt the attached ordinances. FISCAL NOTES = k , a Not applicable. t d F a ~ t ~~rr y ~ ~ I .y. [ r x h s ~x s i`-.`,F"i a: ,?k°,._;,•_ ~,-p; z. s - ~~t - LZ,- r X64, t- _ 5 r r z'~ - ka ~-a^'e VA, h - ~ S ~1 Y Cx k 5 I _ - _ $ ~~,p 3's"~ x a ti` ~ z - u ~z uL to I I L,:^_ I fF - - -+.'-~"4 -~~__.~~~~r~.F^P-. ~.M•~` YTST,ri`..r....rs•..Ym~t^`.. t T.'~`z t+_',. l' -ii-.~~~ 77 71 t y~ 2X"e -..Y" -t - - L+k} 2e r'C.r .A f -.P Wf% 'y-y- - ~ ' j ° Ycawba,`~»o..v::..,.~..s.. ~.....-,v. ..-._a«. ~-.__..v_- .,...._..._.t.... e_.....e.,~.»..,va.~.}tL.~"~'.a."1.`. "L f~a5a A..~ ~ r F- v' { Agenda Item: _s s Hearing_ Date: STAFF REPORT TO THE M ` CITY COUNCIL _ ry nY OF TIOARD f,. y h FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 4 SECTION 1• APPLICATION SUMMARY d ~ } c t v ~ i ~ ~ - t CASES: FILE NAME: Annexed Property Planning Designations I ~ PROPOSAL: The City of Tigard proposes to assign planning designations to r properties that have annexed to the City without previous City Council action assigning Comprehensive Plan and/or zoninge , designations to them. The proposed planning designations and F" properties involved are listed below. Washington County R-6 to Tigard Medium Density Residential/R-7: WCTM 2S1 413D, lots 200, 500, 800, 1900 and 2000. L' Washington County R-9 to Tigard Medium Density Residential/R-12: WCTM 1 S1 35AD, lot 500. Washington County R-6 to Tigard R-7: WCTM 2S1 413D, lots 3200 and 3400; WCTM 2S1 9AA, lot 1100. t r a L , WS, Washington County R-5 to Tigard R-4.5: WCTM 2S1 3AC, lot 2100; 3 t WCTM 2S1 3AD, lot 802; WCTM 2S1 10BA, lots 100, 1500, 1800 W rr MOW Yr and 1900. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNERS: Variousµ s c 4` a~ _ 13125 SW Hall Boulevard" y 'r 1 Tigard, OR 97223 v` v COMPREHENSIVE 7 a - -41 PLAN s DESIGNATION: Various ZONING ~ ~ - DESIGNATION: Various ,t f LOCATION: Various 7y 3 S {S~ h' C' t f '..F G YK i z - _ - STAFF REPORT Annexed Property Plan Designations Page 1 1 , _ r z z 4-- -,t ~a x, r ate +'>.3,- _ ~ t a~'•-`~ s' -7 a £ 2 V2 t i' { k ~ txa n ` f- ,i ~'_,at, ii7 - _ ' - ~ ~ ? FF y t ~.i..a._r..~.r.^..~.r z. t_ l'~;•r ..a. y7°'-c-r~T Y... s - r c ~v r F a - ~ ~'44 x~- cvL . ""01 F ~~`-'.~',Z~'_"-'---~'-- ~ ~ 11 , , . , , , ~ I I ~ . ~ " ' N , i 1 t{`J' E d v- y+° S t f b- u~i; m --t- r - - K A _ - - - .A - E _ - 4r< - F I~'~.ndCti"~1Y £...~tns:ci_.,. ' _ ....,u.. ..:mT.~..~e,.4~°.'-'..'"1`$ h J _ k t - APPLICABLE 4 j REVIEW ~ ' 1 CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies 10.1.3; Community Development Code ¢ - I Chapter 18.136; and Urban Planning Area Agreement, Section s IILB(4d). i 4 SECTION 11: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ' t ~ f _ F 3 E 3 Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached ordinances assigning planning t designations to previously annexed properties. s r t t° SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ,s X. - - _ "i r, 1 C fi J History: The properties listed in this application have been previously annexed to the City _ , through direct action by the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary ~_Z y' " -I Commission (BC). Direct action by the BC can take place in one of two ways: A property ;n y t4 I owner may apply directly to the BC and annex to the City; or an owner may add to an r existing City annexation proposal when it goes before the BC for hearing and decision. E ` i, City staff has been encouraging neighboring property owners to join annexation proposals` that have already been initiated by the City Council and assigned planning designations. x F , l 10 The additional properties are included as part of the City-initiated proposal at the BC s'+; hearings. While the additional properties officially become part of the City, they are not -tI {mow assigned Comprehensive Plan and/or zoning designations through ordinance by the City. 4 1, I t This application requests that the City Council adopt ordinances which assign the ~ ~1 appropriate plan and zoning designations to these properties. As in all annexations, the t specific designations to be assigned to properties are dictated by policies in the Tigard # i r Comprehensive Plan, Community Development Code and the Urban Planning Area ` Agreement between Washington County and the City. This action is in effect, therefore, a ministerial one in which the Councii has no discretion. C ° ~2 t '.4 TrF- 'J'' f L Vicinity Information: The affected properties are located in various parts of the City. t I`~ { - 5 f ~~1 L Site Information and Proposal Description: There are a total of fifteen properties in various ,'a r parts of the City that need to be assigned planning designations. Six properties need Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations because they were annexed from the Area s= of Interest planning area. This area does not have Comprehensive Plan designations { ' assigned to it. Nine properties need only zoning designations because they were " annexed from the Active Planning Area, which has Comprehensive Plan designations I assigned to it. 5 \ 1 _ f h ay This proposal is to assign the appropriate Comprehensive Plan and/or zoning designations to properties that were annexed to the City by the BC that were not assigned f ' such designations. I x - r 1_ r STAFF REPORT Annexed Property Plan Designations Page 2 ~I x ,j , fylf t ",i "i " - 4 - ~ I I ~ ~ , ' J '_-;"i ~ ~ -.t' _~~t~ ' . . . . . . ~ , z 1 z . y L.,-. .ryt t k k P- - -q jFr g *1 16. t ly l f _ _ _ - _ - #f R i A _ t i 11 I -1, 11 ~111 Ir" }j{} "a - - 6..-...` - _ M 7 i - 1 kF F F - - - _ i y 'I 7 17 _,r ._.i _ t S ~Y~ Y } J ~iv+s..._ ..............awM1_..,.x<=.im...,,..w........ ha..,......,..- _ . . » . _ . a - _ ~ - . _ ..a _ _ .N: n 'z C I Y. } i t Sf { SECT110I`.! IV' APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FININGS Comprehensive Plan policy 1.1.2(2) and Community Development Code chapter 18.22.040 set out the decision criteria for approving or denying quasi-judicial t Comprehensive Plan map amendments. These criteria apply to actions that seek changes in existing City designations. This application seeks only to apply City S designations to newly annexed territory in the first instance. The City Council finds, therefore, that these decision criteria do not apply to the current proposal. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES:_ i ` Annexation of Land: Policy 10.1.3 requires the City to assign the zoning district t i designation to annexed land which most closely conforms to the Washington County zoning designation. There are several ways to initiate annexation of land to a - ' city under the Oregon Revised Statutes. The City prefers using the double majority fi method, which requires a resolution from the City Council to the Boundary Commission rt initiating the annexation. At the same time the Council passes the resolution, it adopts an ' ordinance assigning the property(ies) a Comprehensive plan designation, if the land is annexed from the City's Area of Interest, and a zoning designation. These planning designations are determined by policies included in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Community Development Code and the Urban Planning Area Agreement. Due to these policies, the Council has no discretion in applying the designations. The properties of this t j application will be assigned comprehensive plan and zoning designations that most closely match the previous County designations. This policy is satisfied. s =x ~d x COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: F Annexations: Section 18.136.030(B) requires the City to place plan and zoning I r Y designations on the annexed property which most closely implements the City's or x t t County's comprehensive plan map designation. See Section IV above under Annexation of Land, °nlicy 10.1.3. f ty { COMPLIANCE WITH URBAN PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT "r Y j ` Area of Interest: Paragraph 4(d) requires the City to convert County plan designations to City plan designations which most closely approximate the density, use provisions and standards of County designations upon annexation of land i within the Area of Interest. Six properties listed under Section I above were located in the City's Area of Interest before annexation. These are WCTM 2S1 413D, lots 200, 500, ' E 800, 1900 and 2000, and WCTM 1S1 35AD, lot 500. The proposed City designations of Medium Density Residential and R-7 for the first five properties are the planning designations that most closely match the County designation of R-6. The proposed City designations of Medium Density Residential and R-12 for the sixth property are the I ' M1:. . planning designations that most closely match the County designation of R-9. This policy is satisfied. = tz t - ~ STAFF REPORT Annexed Property Plan Designations Page 3 - _ 77-7- t r.. g - y "a~~`..taa"2~+h aka. C ~ ~ 1 - - ~ 4 4 'M M ° its F - - - _ t. v d 1-1 M 11 _--J y~.-$-,y - ice - 7 e t - - - J f x a Y - ✓ a F' k n a , ? > x ~Ar ask r i t - R4 _ - TII~'I •i, TLICC STAFF f~All■aI ? Y~ !ti. ACl+11VIV V OTHER STAF- VVIVIIyIENI\ITQ V ~ } +~_#f' Y5 " ; 0 Since this proposal is a housekeeping item to assign plan designations to properties ~ ` i ; a , . r -t` s already annexed to the City, no comments were sought from other City departments.. ' x r t i ~Y -i -f.+" TM P i r ? 4® ~1. i SECTION VI AGENCY COMMENTS F - z 4 Since this proposal is a housekeeping item to assign plan designations to properties xt d' 11 already annexed to the City, no comments were sought from other agQnc- z - ; ut f .y. J -f F x Y' - t t -pk'- sty t .i~ 'N - y iF'f" tl.. h d~ ...d- '~'.+"§S, -fir. - , PREPARED BY: Ray Valone DATE l . ` xr-_ Associate Planner e V.'I--I'v" 3 1 ? e ii r - ` APPROVED BY: Nadine Smith DATE , ~v ~ a~ - ax Planning Manager # q xg" ~"~~'v'-""'~'-~ ~ " ~ ~"N - It I r+, t - r K _ r _ n ''C s "34 e' '4 , - 1 -r r 1 -E o5 j f' Y i - i h,, - , I- F't3 A 4 y T F 1$4 r ~n 4 S- -fir c. 8U ((R r - " t d f - +^-L. y t rx 't, =mot a- . - s t - u C- ti 3 x, r t y5 STAFF REPORT Annexed Property Plan Designations page q h",Y a, r a ~.rr~ . _ xw'%F t^"`t , rr `=2"':r'; `~"sh.;:~.'-,'~~" "f> a-~"c:..a^ r. w .ra w"v:-- * ,rt ` t'~ t r v ^L +'r t r c _ x t r -u, 'F'!'~~'~"4 , m 'r. , , , j - v` vb I c, l - I r - I F rs < ''fir v x - 71 - ~ c W1 t €5 t V Y M;-I ~ ,i I ' 'z " ; ~ - " ~ I _ ' _ _ _ ~1~'~~ . . . _ r ~ :"""r i r- _V - - I 1, r .L 4 t ' x' x a xi N ' x - x- .Yt i`r, a'+ Y-- , --e ~ rr- r3,-7 L; _ K 4 k ~ZY ti 1 '.~h J.- }4 r.~ tt i ` ~ z5 € u ,0 AGENDA ITEM # I L :u s.:_.y y : For Agenda of 1` G 4;1. s:' ; x +''c r~s r x - ® # a { f 3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON - + COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY x ; ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Vacation of anuroximatedy 6.445 square feet of public rig t of w y on SW 135th 't' _ $ Avenue..." t { 4 i i ' is ; - PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK v ISSUE BE FORE THE COUNCIL t } d o- Should the City Council vacate approximately 6,445 square feet of „hlic •;ght_ofw_•' or, S` 135 T' 4 - r P~ -•e-•• th Avenue. K _^"i 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION ~ 01_:Z S n c Xr re ~ a f - _ - - a r ra - It is recommended that Council approve the vacation as requested. N - INFORMATIONSi1MMARV rwrn d .L i" .'~r" t - Council initiated this vacation at a public meeting held on June 11, 1996 (See Exhibit D, Res. 96-37). t z~ 1T lt! , 4 7 f ~ The City of Tigard Engineering Department is requesting that the City Council vacate approximately 6,445 square f x v~ r{ ~'~r y^ feet of public right-of-way on SW 135th Avenue. In conjunction with the construction of Castle Hill No.2 ? ~ r?' f ~ L'111 Subdivision, SW 135th Avenue was re-aligned to provide a "T" intersection with SW Walnut Street. The re- t r V j n alignment shifted the road to the west (See Exhibit A). As a result, an approximately 6,445 square foot portion of ;w ~ p ' 5 the public right-of-way is no longer needed. The property owners adjacent to the vacation area have an ; T' ~'P'_ '194 { { understanding that those five effected properties will acquire additional square footage. These properties will t~~ ,fir , ~ receive approximately 477, 899, 1,246, 1,375, and 2,448 square feet respectively. - .y- , - 'f -lo 3 The City of Tigard Water Department and GTE Telephone Operations have indicated that there are existing buried tJ .>i- z > ` . i facilities within the right-of-way to be vacated. A condition will be imposed which will require the provision of a 6 ~ ~~x~ ? = 7 utility easement over the area to be vacated. t I 2 - , ' r " 6 t , + r` ` 3 Attachments: Exhibit A - site lank , 111. x ( plan) Exhibit C - (vicinity map) z ~ 3 ~ , 11 Exhibit B - (legal description) Exhibit D - (resolution 96-37) 4i r t OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 8f _ f 4 r ,f- _ C } ` 1. Approve the vacation request. t= r 2. Deny the vacation request. - a 3. Take no action at this time. >x ~111 11 - 4 i-i' .R""p , ,1 OI 4 1-1- 1. F4 _ y 135th Avenue Public R.O.N. Street Vacation is\citywide\sum\vacl35t2.sum ' ; {~Y ; .f`.y ' I - Page 1 of 1 will d. 07/05/96 11:33 Mt ' - Y ar m.:r' ;•~a*.s,cz' i`- '.`::rS:u r,.- 4 M~,:, _ - . - i kb.d--F_'d 41~S T - a 't ; 'r - ~ t ? - -l' - PS t r t' - t -t 64 Y~ i 2 ,1-, ~.F h w - ti. S_rL-4 „r- _ - uryY fi J -i r-* - - -f 6 -'s r~,.a' r - - Lf r 1 ".7" aY 4 X, it 4 4 { 7 TsJ,ale` "I , " I ~ { W k - V11 ti. t 11 , fi 0_' i k ~M . 2M k'-f _ F l \ , ' ~ ~'-s ' l O , - s s 2 t 'k wa x_ - - ate' - ca q r, - r s t t k .1 I q S f - Yt r l t .SLn "fit v_.. , ___I - ..,v._,-s,.. ~.e ~ " a b ; J -1-1 I S -t+- ~t --E - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t 3 y ?t ~ ORDINANCE NO. 96-_ Y £ i AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE VACATION OF APPROXIMATELY 6,445 SQUARE t - ; FEET OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ON SW 135TH AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, - -......v.-• f~~ 4. h - " WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. t WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to Section 15.08.040 of the i i = * Tigard Municipal Code on June 11, 1996; and t i ~ U, , WHEREAS, the right-of--way for SW 135th Avenue had been dedicated to the public; and k f, ` ` . ' _ t WHEREAS, the City approved a Subdivision (SUB 93-0008) for the development of Castle Hill No.2 t= { - AN ~ I Subdivision; and t---$ WHEREAS, Southwest 135th Avenue was re-aligned in conjunction with the construction of Castle Hill { a' No.2 Subdivision; and ~ +tt, fn> F WHEREAS, the approximately 6,445 square feet of public right-of-way is no longer necessary; and ' ' ~ a WHEREAS, the vacation has been initiated by the City Council and approval has been recommended by the 4 tc Y: 1 to ; Community Development Department; and Er j - ~ WHEREAS, all affected service providers, including utility companies and emergency service providers,, y Y h ` have reviewed the vacation proposal and have no objections; and f 2 ~ w 2 z _F w WHEREAS, GTE Telephone Operations has a major six-way conduit system on the west side of the t~ centerline within the old SW 135th Avenue right-of-way which will require the granting of a utility ~ ~ ' x T easement; and 4" " V - ' WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Water Department has a 16-inch water main located within the proposed - '`,z = gk s s vacation area that will require the granting of a 15-foot utility easement; and 6~ x2 e WHEREAS, notice has been mailed to all property owners abutting said vacation area and all owners in the, {f e affected area, as described by ORS 271.080; and t r t , WHEREAS, in accordance with Tigard Municipal Code 15.08.120, the City Recorder posted notice in the t F , area to be vacated and published notice of the public hearing; and k ' u ' t WHEREASi the property owners of the majority of the area affected have not objected in writing; and. y r r;;' 1 - -11 NA WHEREAS, the City Council having considered the request on August 13, 1996, finds that it is in the a`, 's y , r ~ i public interest to approve the request to vacate said public right-of-way as the public interest will not be s - - nrejudiced by this vacation, as provided be ORS 271.120 and TMC Section 15.08.130; and * r1 NP J ` rr r `f ) ORDINANCE No. 96- is\citywide\ord\vacI35t2.ord ~ti' # r c s _ si Page l oft wi!! d. 07105/96 1?:M AM ~11' f J fi ' @r&(6 t t i" R P - S ! h d .mow, a6`.~.s.:a` ^"'241`sM,.-h,r wyati%';*•`. s'i '7' 4eTM- N,, ',',~FX S F -11,11 , , 71 4, } t 3.~' - S' r _ _ t d'~ F J f - ar` L..~ s E t i f t'~.f}S}5' S 1 x }J 4 - ',f 5~' 4 - - - - L C t' ~ , .1'1~ _T"':'1_ - , . I I - . I I . . . - ~ . ~ a .1 I ~ - ~ 2., S . ~ - w-- 'IE xfi > MR -zX r -W - - _ r - `'Yj`~'xwf1~ RIM 0 -1215,t - x- r- , WHEREAS, the Council finds that the following conditions are necessary to vacate said land: 1. A utility easement shall be provided within the vacation area. r- _ t }z r f i NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: 4 i s a , SECT iOiv is ine Tigard City Council hereby orders the vacation of said approxiriately 6,445 square n- t , R f feet of public right-of-way as shown and described on the attached Exhibits A and B a - r -3q (map and legal description of area to be vacated), and by this reference, made part y :r thereof. t {a a SECTION Z: The Tigard City Council further orders titat the vacation be subject to the rouuwir.g t condition: 4 a x ? 1. A utility easement shall be provided within the vacation area. t ` SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, approval by the r7 t Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. z k PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of 1996. 62 M } t ~4 Y frA l Catherine XkTheatley, City Recorder N ' r` - -r` - ' APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of 1996.; 3 James Nicoli, Mayor 161 Approved as to form: £ Y r ~ qtr City Attorney F c _ E+ 1.~ w ~S Date { tr~s- -L x y ~ t { s - 1 ~ g r L~ a ~ K fi_ Il d 3 L,L f -4 s' r rr --3 - xQ f j ORDINANCENo.96- is\citywide\ord\vacl35t2.ord A g 'yr 4 _ ~JJJ 3t will d. 07/05/9611:04 AM t p r tYF C t~ 6 - 3 t 5 Y d S=,z~E"J V 442' F IS Mw" d { 7F A.+" A r"t 1 MUa Y. _ L r - 3 X Std { ♦t F v J ~•'}C. F~ 'cam 7 ~ - - $ "*4' i r o,.ra~.ntP..,«,.._~_,.. 2e_d...,..~„~..a_.....-,?.,,.,.~,.~....~....rswema.... v.,_...,_., -,.~ara a, ~ ~`~`s~`.}~ EXHIBIT A ! f~ L Rte. - ~ t p 11♦ b s ~ . ;,ft 3 S 9 / O, h x a r r s > a Fx 1C9 its LU c r / I t > V.t 117 i Ina eta 6 -t5 t ou, eq ~ _ ~ z 1 Lr! f fis d 4 'J 'I.LC37,C•Y ".rE I aq t s s `^„t,' .S'3 1 z } 't ✓ ` I I NEW t - ♦ ~ 10• EAST Cf=,vM.Mt_NE I t ~3 d x. F E r r i i _ :.~C.=7 a: n= -U 't ry.;c t R{ Et G' _C, r L - _ °j •V'~ \i % ( to 'J n000_ A _SS FC..R O I # t CE-c.V.SCN ?C`0 r w 6't-t t~ F s t I 17 ' i #t,-- ~ t1P i iryf~ i PLOT PLAN CASE NO. e v i I SW 135th Avenue i, 1,1M rite ' 2 EXHIBIT MAP Public Right-of- way Vacation I 5-1 F r qk a - r f -4 _ t G _t ! r A, ' 1 a z r "x k "r 42 t -1 - a.irhCS t'rr -a _ - r r4 r3ix r xsT•F S.. rc~- t 4 J t ~ ] ? s ri MR- £ V "~K'~~'"4 4 Y'. - 'Y. ~r - ~ ' -~.n ti 1 f - ~ -s...:...'v..w.a:.ma x> - __W 3. _ ° 5,:._,,,.,.,.,.z, 3p... ~..,_ys.,~.....- _ r f EXHIBIT B , r i LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' s 4 r FOR , I'll ROAD VACATION x - . ~ 11 a~u' atv ti ® u _ - That portion of S. W. 135th Avenue in Northeast One-Quarter of Section 4, Township 2 ° South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon „ " described as follows: s -0 9 I - Y'om' C 4 4 , t Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Lot 114 Morning Hill No. 5 as recorded in Book t 63 Page 33 of the Washington County Subdivision records; thence S 02° 14' 27" W, r' j N ` _ , r along the westerly line of said Morning Hill No. 5, a distance of 232.00 feet to the south - t}' e west corner of Lot 117 of Morning Hill No. 5 and the north line of the property described c r r x ` ' in Fee No.90028208 in the Washington County Deed Records; thence N 87° 45' 33" W, 11 ,5 along said north line, a distance of 15.00 feet to the northwest corner of said Fee No.; ri fi thence S 02° 14' 27" W a distance of 259.25 feet to a point on a curve to the left; thence 2 5 z a p ` .b11 - along said curve with a radius of 545.00 feet, a delta of 03° 13' 24" (a chord which bears IL. _ N 16° 47' 50" W, 30.66 feet) and a length of 30.66 feet to a point which is 10.00 feet "U"M ! . ' easterly of the center line of S.W. 135th Avenue(when measured at right angles); thence A j Y ; i 1, r N 02° 14' 27" E, parallel with and 10.00 feet from said centerline, a distance of 280.27 ''"£z r feet to a point; thence N 10° 25' 20" E a distance of 49.19 feet; thence N 6° 25' 17" E a ~ ; ~ a _ distance of 60.16 feet to a point on a non tangent on curve to the left; thence along said § " ai~ rs V curve with a radius of 380.00 feet, a delta of 8° 40' 24" (a chord which bears N 9° 33' , , , « ~ - t 55" E, 57.47 feet), and a length of 57.52 feet to the extension of the north line of Lot 114 = - _ Morning Hill No. 5; thence S 87° 45' 33" E, along the extension of the North line, a 1 v ~ t * d~ distance of 5.46 feet to the point of beginning. & i - ~ , SUBJECT TO a utility easement for all utilities on or within the entire vacated portion of r ' 1 ~ ~ r ` a said 135th Avenue. 7" g~ s u - t -t sea z - -I 1 rL ^-`ca 1% ~11 I L, ~ , y r F r ~ .t^? - ' _ i:-ej.he,hA35...& { }'ter G - ks e , t ' « 5 a , 3t i .1 s s F ,,',1 r ,r , at >r - . ;..ire' - t - _ y .y4 V- - i_Y tom' Yk. I sk Fh , p-r-„.-8r~ i - a, -s~ }r u it r ,%Y 1 S F K- Y _ - + µ,..c>rc 'x "W'M j~:' 'k~ s,,;gfr' a.-r rxssau~se_. i t'+-':m,+~,."~z ::€ra a s a,'i`. ql~Y€ _ 3 -J _ ~ M"'. .x,}11 _ r y { U P « . 9 r -s, r { 1 5rYk,',K 6 - t fir. ;a , " I . . . _ ~ - , , , " t , ~ tt t E - - - _ - - 71 ` 5 z;rK ...u , . ,_._.,.._.b _ EXHIBIT C~.~:b~_ ~ - MORNING PLC ~N t CT v w . r p ;I If t r7 ~J YRQ~j - OSLO SWe Y u` i R ST 4 ~ SW- Co s t r 'i f .r SW MARCIA DR i r 4L °r is SST fi i23 tr - µ ® , I ~ U1 { vity Map SW 135th Avenue Public ROW Vacaiion Note: Map is not to scale N E~-.sTMF?SYhn.N.+ - _a...: • . r~ , s_...,a -r - k 'I ^•^,a!.[-^T^'^}~..:~.^a~oT~77-77777 _:,i.lY^~~~•r~..+•~.+ - .-.~F-T^Y~,Xfn~.w....T,+~...~~~~n•~+~+.~.~.~..+~ J h~, g4 - - _ . 11 ~ `1" Z ' fix' ~h L T - - - _ --a. r , ! - z~~ -vim`` y - 4 -y - - - 'Y 'L 3 - 1,Z6 ~ ' `1 ~ ~ 'X 1 sou. k'l •o - x i _ "3 i... "5 {'n e,-k c ~ - ~ "n - e'fir o-- ~ ~ " r~' ``t g • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON': ' ` v;:'' e RESOLUTION NO. 96- ,3 z ^RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE VACATION OF APPROXIMATELY 69415 SQUARE " FEET OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ON SW 135TH AVENUE. 0 t :0s~ z 3 e WHEREAS, the right-of-way for SW 135th Avenue had been dedicated to the public; and y ' # J, A - ` WHEREAS, the City approved a Subdivision (SUB 93-0008) for the construction of Castle Hill Phase II; s = t s and -t WHEREAS, SW 135th Avenue was realigned in conjunction with the construction of Castle Hill Phase II; v < - i and i'' ~ WHEREAS, the approximately 6,445 square feet of public right-of-way is no longer necessary; and Z , ~ q r - , 2 s 4 _ r WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds it appropriate to initiate proceedings for the requested vacation. J x ?'r'te; -n _ x ! _ + NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: [ - 4 - o F at SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council initiates a request for the vacation of approximately 6,445 I' z square feet of public right-of-way on SW 135th Avenue, as more particularly s A~~ = A described in Exhibit "B". d a ' > ` tt ~ 3 °f f i ®ECTION 2: A public hearing is hereby called to be held by the City Council on Tuesday, August , i h '7 'i~j f y ` i r 13, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, within the b - r City of Tigard, at which time and place the Council will hear any objections thereto, , IV " > and any interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed - {Y 5w, ~ MN 5~ ' vacating of said public right-of-way. 11 11 " ' SECTION 3: The City Recorder is hereby authorized and directed to cause to have published in , y vl , i the Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Tigard, a notice e&' r" --Z ,&r - ' t at of said hearing,-the first publication to be on July 25, 1996 and the final publication tri s ' ( 11 i , to be on August 1, 1996. The Recorder is further directed to cause to have posted , ;1 ` t J . - k T ` within five days after the date of first publication, a copy of said notice at, or near, " - r each end of the area proposed to be vacated. y[{ - SECTION 4: The particular public right-of-way to be vacated is shown on the attached Exhibit " a E - - . "A" and by reference, made a part hereof. ( _ x ~ E zs PASSED: This 1 _ day of 1996. t w- k u^' - F # 1I } - - t Y f F ~ `a k or - City ofTig d y l F t RESOLUTION NO. 963-2 75 { ' ' ' Page 1 - t~ 4 S/ .,--r._ crwar",`q f n r'a .4~ S-".'r4 . ff q a - _ -"E - .f 1. F i 3 - - i '4 1 t 11 - Yjy - S 4 1 _ - - 5 L P - 2*S 8f £ y j i i 7" 1 9 it ;Nj d t - - J V '~x - ' x - - .a -r f w " k zi+, tYf - ; r --cJ# ft P ~ i iz- x k r j EM r--✓ ; t s - _ II y+ E J Y~ Y C k _ f ,a `r1s~ i rrk y [•s .ws: i i r P1 f H L.~ .p! 1 j 1 t _ _ d i ;..:..w,!'a;.,;C.~.r.,,ra L~~`::.. ..-.y ~ ttlw.~ Li~.ty.:,~~ ~1 r,.,. ~ '1~'~, I , d 4 .K - i m ~ 5 a ~ 3 rr -l~ £ •_n: t~ rv~ ,~7°T r', g,f "x .:r5.. ~Er„ ' < S x~ :Y aa' k a 3 N ':~„F`.F' ` Y' _`1,t .t'r'gg__ a .C :;i' = 9 Sb"re ,r Ph S>t. )t n1 ^su ~:§,,tt ,3 t.n , z r:. F'y. ..1, a ..d • ,,ga~l'T : (rr, aF3^ c c , s t`fi" d. F~ •rr. ' P•-A'a ^ ' s^f. , ".SY, n "3~ a' z~' ~~~ir, ~,c".'~3t~ Hat'a. Y:,.;rNa~.. _A~d"'•$^. U yg. '',a„ A . E. ~i'• a: Y`"+. r - ~ ~ r, IN O AN .1," + > rx „s..r -s 5• .K,.,. a -4',*.,, n'~,:~, ty ~ ~ .,•n1i a~°,t~,.r, K < ! 7,. x.~ ~ . °iF e.w 1zv;~;x•}: p?, ro s,.al x.,- ld. x"a! {,.cm # r e:,,^4.>ti......,x.•,M,-.,,.c..r .a :r;, a~~i.. ~a : ,t :-ti'.' , ~:~Y ai'a> „x"r R.,`~ q~ d;-sY T ,a, 6... .u3 - fY: . . a` . h s a sr.l.~t x " 3t` > y~~ _ R'F .,q„~; ~ w..';a.. _ ~',."ta+~. .+:u> .:z, v rn :t•#' s a '1 C W . r-~ sv a.t c.. S. t awe L v v 03'= d U? ,fi d?"'.rr ,mF: ~.n+.r , v'!~. y~ 5 ' b M ,s MY ~ -a vs,, Y, •"'r ^t ~r :n ,,t ~ , '*:,2i" S a ;"'"7C '';'H"~ ~:~r k~. nt .^F ,Es, ~S•.5, r., .'Ai' ..°W":~ad.. ?.r • rt? . 5:'~r6 '13n, ~,f ~ rv,."- :.ay -'~.+r :.rvn:rr„ "hr<' 4' w +.S^ uc ;x, t'~ a "rigs '+a, ,i2 - - 7~. ^ a RSxF : .vt,. r .L~,. ~ E : •K:virt~;"-.S!. „S. t? M _r 2,..r`." R .,Xa,•~. :4, ' -p:, „-^u ri a ,tya.x,,re > ,~y ti^: , shk q»a., e ~s^`, t~ ka r t i , -«:`1~ 1a ,~r. a . „r ~ ~ ~,r. Y `urn ~4 <~r • .v . ' '.'f' ~ ~°:"Sta$~ "w•t 33 d1 ",y •,fi a ,•x! , ^ :k'- ..~rro , r._ y;r n+ - ':;1 n: ~ ,)7r' t` n- • +xu', 5a.;' S if 7r:'+'~ ° . ~ . . 1 "Y- r ~ - , ^•"t s r s", y s'•1. 5 ..•r'4.,.-. r, . ~"35~ j ' ~ w. 6 rls~", i . ~ >4' ' ~r'' :F'a 5,-'~,'.~,t~. a., ~1,•'rz. • .44; .c .r,< ti '.1 ,rEai~ ,•;~t& 'J ±i~. . su to Yr .r: , r- r~n:~ s G n-~ ~",i', , ry. Jr FF w6:c,,, 1 . -;.~,n,: y74". .v"'^' =`°>`:''N • G,~~n:..._:9,,.•.~a,.e,. '•'r`;'~y;=~<^Y:.- ,>f '':a Tx, m' 1 - r! • ,~r rNi` 'o%4rr` .1.., .r.;,Fr 3,,.~ 1F t r , x rr •sf a'< l '4.'c.',, r'4 4.'- i• 3 I " .'..d•d ' ,n . a-a`>'s." ~ d, ss W d' s• A f a S ^i" r t .f' ,_..•~.._L,-tb &..,r••ek~>:diwY.hL.^~+:1...+,,,~tL.c:..u~S+.%~:cv.:~f.:.wi.,Z".a_,u~ie~ x k 6, m r i+ , 1 , ! Ya .0 No ¢ y rr, l i P t E r f i t{gqtg( - l , f 7 a gI 1 1 1 FFF - t ten 1 } y to ?MAR W:_~ ' >t Wvk .1flum "S' A c Ch Q y1, ,f h'. y ! ~t K J ~ ~ i S . r # -7 J u p z r t yre~,r;? t Y of 1~~ 5 1f w' r~ ~ m 7 h ~ u tl v~,Yi a q C C ~ '4 P' C* Z ay h~&k ,E d r F - , ✓ }rvF 1° " a s+-c e'. U 3 W 1~'~~ ,(f~~b h~. am~rr 9y Q f°,. Y.l ~.r~~ ~'Yry Asa" '`x - p ` rk ~r ~:i n'k ~xfq~r tyit m rL 'd a`irr d~ s, !U i~ -ia at'4ti+£ a A t ;t~>t~e ~ d i , I c ~y 1f l a. S bey ~'S e ]f h,3 - 3 T t' b r 5 f"y _ _i ~ a! ` ~~~~~r~,~m",a~t i Fg _ •-^-;*•r Q.,r-.,_°«~q~. ~ , 'n •.o - - o . ~ 2 -t a s t,, n ~ } rak,: a t~ 7N :,`V.- r' • „s~ _ 3 1 r, ' w " d k ~ • .;Ci f~ ? T~ r~ ~3 t- - A - ~ f u~ ' t y R^ t M 11 'Y h^Y' r 9 14 7v q2li, 2CA a4 ,>f' r a S' `ni' t - ';Y ba, ,v;3, ;to` 4 . * vt, "ra. '•1, 1.-v + o ,5, x k1,'e'^' a." °•rfi., a .,r-" . w' •y.• n. - r. °7- '~-it- 'E r. as }.,r ~ t ¢ ''s• rL .A,. i +s"~£°5''::" v,.,, 'L•_. ,X„l^a ^a4~,si'.. 1 y'• 6dr! r't .s , n~ i•: r a. ~'b;;. r- i~rv "+f* ta+ 3~ .g ` <,...-M: va "~s ...w.C' .7°1 1 ~ '¢.7 ~ w.`1S r,^k- ~r. '8!k , s„- 3~i .Y`#' .F.,a as . ~~qv 1.. '$r•'r, kip x.>-}~^,-,- z f . s'S ii,€~.^:. }Ihl .~.r ff. ?i!- - i pr. ..:7,• x`' ,.y 'h'>'lmti' ° ..LA. sue, ' e'mu'„~'.~_•'~"tl,!..% `nr-,.e+` .I"°cr .,a, c'~^,. I ~~y~ 4 6 .L~^'en'rf ''hhi a zaNc'e ':•SN` :,r', u ,,,t . ~ ~'SS~'~.i•t'?#-.,•, :'v k, a+--. w,y, - ,..r#„•: • a 4' a°R Ad .45'+e Ta :.b S> -gip+• .i+" .T. _.'a+'"~ w,e'^te d-,. ^5" ~ ,ya~ 'YU`! b ,I ~q~,;:.,r. ~ "f `4^.'! I .ilk? :.'t 3 ~•Y :snr?. ,tt`'{,m r.k:.6?M .i~w ..~>a ,c'd. '•_'~wi.' R'~^-,a N' 'x:.11,'3 ,f ~y~' J;"iiai, ~,,~i ,k:~4S„ :ilJ r'•:Clvr v:>jl• a'",era-n `,5Y ,f A 2 ,v~~ 4,. .}-.bl, }t~ .vex,".:<s.a ilk' .~~e~.- '1 g r~`w h° .gym. .sh' _ - '°:y f.:i'•,>' k „+z .c" tyg ~#.r r u• „a, :'mt.. :;t +=i•. I•' 's' t t.aX Mrs.'. ku. gt. 3 ~i: »y.A, .+h 4 ea,"v nN.^.ua'+i, ^,.,Y. r•a F" 'v'Ex .'S , ~y' •.-has". kv:*,« '(.m `?.`t°~ P:-rR*., C-. ['M• i d•A "L n "•~u i { S,+R 4,,,~`n `~t3`vri' it m1. ,t <:6i~"ja*,, vb w 4w.,....,{»...;=a. taw,. .>c ,t•t '<'3,~ ..lax. .,r. ^x';w ,d^ ! E. ='~.k;n~•^a, 'L'. ri,:",r~`.`~:' -c,sT`` a x '„r'• 8• m?5£R .5•..Ma,• h r, zs :.a.,,k„ ~t..,N ";~''a ''ia;'a;~_.,,a'z ~Ye.aY-I~~, ^.~d,:a% ~=a'v^ e~ ~~•'Fx ~~x .>i w'. x. 1: •':N : 3hir: 'v~'•" ;i . 1. ^.,tz,-(~".'~K~ .,d., -~+k +~K ' r.,Y' ~ ~ a• r* « x - t•, ::,'i, :~b:I z , : F .,..`S.~ .,W 1,•. s,s,,. r. ~K~,.. w•`'1 0-., wv ! 6'~ i r~4,1 'C." $r°. w°+il':yv f- nr.S+A,. ~ " , {V :"~v'N , Vn t~+A '~L+V r` i'" t '~h:'~'x .rv , .b ~'f =.'nY. ~ .,F"~'k'i - .~'v k-.5 }'"5, 'r£ h 3'M%~i it r . r n v• .-h i- u t, t''r`L, :F"'- .y r ; ~4°' '•r°ku;E - h,a-rs,a.. y :d^r ra ~.w w 3rab Kn tt :F . rs', ,,a ',r- x, ,.r~," s^, „.~C. •a':s'i .,.-r .,.~.':'e;~n:':`~' ,'aar,, ~rti~x, ~'c',;.. z>~ ,S.fir, "a 'x 7.v.t~ §a ~ . N , , r-~'3 Y ~ ~r-t. d v.y •'f,: .:t s5.•:t .'w^»^. ,.r'"., r~~ "s x~:ta ,,:-s .c# a," fi~""r~ >r r.~. ,p,,., 7F:J"'w~S~"m '~'N o~ ,•a..r. :s~ '+'B:.'-t{ ~,r..r,eai~..y.,l-~ n a h-'~`~~s'°.r 3• s.,~ ,n, i '."'v: ~n :~3 ~~aa , ~ e _ . art, ~.'N~, -.i.~+. ° . ~ , v .,a *"3u ~1~::';, . r `w'«, ~ ~t t~ = ~ . •a~,. 3.,,„~.• .t~4 •'n~ ~i~r+ t_ 3 y " t< , ~>d., a ':-W' d' i. ..p• . r'~' ta"". z = 6 t'b-~ ,a..,, - r1v r9' . F+ -rti'bra „~';:,iA;,;k. m -9, f W ~ Y~ ; •'t. ,a,>• an*w' -..M;. , o- 2'E v ,r,'^„) a`•7+ n - '~1 ? .ak'•"fi~`-•.,>+ea~--•r, . k >a,~"':. , a,: , ~n'~ 'V s .1 `~';~'er _ ,r ~ 3}%c.Fi"",• r$',• 4^. ~ n,, C r.r+.3 ttv ',.'ti af°.,. ..r ~~;,:?:='ar,. ,>n IS> z._ •,v.s.,, .m"" ;~F...~w ;6"° ,7~~,.„ , Air. c. ,a ' ~w,~ y . # ~ •,r'" et- . a ' , , .d9r . .i~ ,°s _ ^ x~ ~c.dt.,:~-, '.':'~'rv'7 '"r", v.,-` ,r~„•L~, pw a .-k"`.a":. ~ 'y q =r£ n a„ -„~y'M;, 35 •3`-ti ..r.a: na-5m ^',."r."'t` a~ ~kiP' x. is~'+ ,~s, s,ar„~ ~n s't~.*.~,"+ "y'r Sqz v.., ,M.~'r., `4'~'k'~. ,.ad„ wr 9 ~ .,•,v ~ _r'~,. r k'>,~,,;)~» y^. Ft,r, ,r `.L, .•s,°::. v" :zr. .e.r,. ~ 5~-. r.fi., 9 ,'rs::; h'"4,,~ I J ~ a.t,.:"'3;r! : .i.°..!',a, ,f 4• " Y•' rF,. ~x . ~ ,s ,,#y . Y(~ a . a ~fi} -°'~m^".i:$`" m '`-',yw,,, ,L,>n,~ ' a'- 6„ta b~=', „'1 . •z .r ,w~ ~h~ ,s, 7 '~-,e t,.. - aC k~. 8's' °><rt " k ~ . ,~.4:.. ..•s.~a ' :wL e s`a •,^d.. ~ . 'M~,~" rf1'-ib. sr,) c •At ri ~ ,rq. aa^. a. M"i t `!•,~,i x +6,L 3i~' "~t:' `.n t",#, aF I' ~ n. A ~t"'r<~`rP •s,' . '3 • ~G;! 7'. c S ~ "',a a f' 'Ts + r••t~ Y.a r:n .r t, ei~,:,+, r ,^`~r^ .t , t - „L . ~ ~°'^"to +~"w`?i. , + s ...a . . '~~°'z>W '"~`'d abz c :d e ,..vS S' . ~ , s,~ , m~ . nxas•.s., ` ~e` i':'~ : ,,yt„ ~.:e,^;~c w . ~ R~ t; . UG., .r. -.c rrc~ v+v i ~ y. ~..TuW _ `,i, +^'1?fii'- , y>'r„ v,,,^'~ t'1^,- >r'~" "-P` se-=.. - s . x .,~I..'F~.' :sYrn ,...45 a 5. _~;...,_„~^'T ~'h.4*t. ,zs Gx r~Y r, :e . s x,. a " x,,r~» kx. a• • ,,...a.a . ,3 ,a, +4..r, r r,--;a b...3'"9 h.-> .r ~'x Ar "f'~>4'a as~ - , >a k`-, ~ ' : '7 , I.: ~ ~p :di:'~+a" .r J- w ~'S. x r d,sl , .-.J St.. Y$ • L',+ .ii; „hn•.- . »a'y : 9f4 hr a k i . Y ~ » ' , ryr'7 ° h ~ a,: _ -"a•.. ,v ~ r. „x ,i,:"^.... qm aY-,.r~ "S qr }},""t fi'...y .,.T n•!- a 1•, ~S.t ~:z• "b:. c (~;•#aw x?r~,;;, {~.Mr'd, aJl e,4"_"n f '.r+. a ~ry, .s, 'a-,•, ,t-"--: r.. t.,_"a"C.< i >x -'n- n M,,,,~°:u ~,a.,x~ a: . , e t~,x F.'iaa,, r,-r."',"~s~- .1. s ...a .'~•.,-7. srs.;t,,:;,,.'Y, t:Y.~ R,, ....~,,.~,';~m r~;a„,.... , >,x„v, s., ,n>"'sr4:a , : v of i -Y" d `""W'u a - a t `-z T - -V~ - - any 4 - - _ - K q K Z + a t + 3' ~~~t a .a _ u' z.. w. _ ..._v........ , . . _ ' t 2 L 's g _ i - s 7 - *~rv d th y.~ - - F. sx r . AGENDA ITEM # Z5 For Agenda of July 9. 1996 - Set cri,•en ti 1. t, a - a' 1- 0,l3/'71A e i v CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON - - COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY I . - r _ { f F ca ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 96-0002 AKA Business Services ' ~ c , E PREPARED BY: Ray Valone DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ' a i ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL t 1ti F-.-1 ..-F Should the City Council approve a Comprehensive Plan text amendment to modify Policy - k f r 12.2.1(2)(81)? r tom,, _ --Vv-,.~,::, - I 'r 'i', - - - - fit`- STAFF RECOMMENDATION ? . t:.. - - c , The Planning Commission recommended denial of this proposal at its hearing of May 20, 1996. s Planning staff recommends that the City Council deny CPA 95-0006 because all relevant comprehensive plan criteria are not satisfied and staff does not believe the proposal is beneficial to the `A'k a -g" ` City as a whole. - t° .f. 3; t it }J P'3 1 1 INFORMATION SUMMARY H V . ~ -11 ' 4 The proposed text amendment would modify one criterion used to evaluate proposed comprehensive f , , , - t plan map amendments and zone changes concerning General Commercial land. Currently, then locational criteria restricts General Commercial areas from being surrounded on more than hvo sides by ~,';1 . 4i~~~F - -11 residential districts. The proposal would maintain this restriction for new General Commercial areas but I allow the expansion of existing ones if the City Council finds that four conditions are met. The staff~Y a report and a hcant's submittal are attached. - V R > PP f s ` OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED fi _ z, " . . " , ~ ~ 1-i - I ,.r ~ 1. Approve the proposal and direct staff to return on July 23 with the ordinance and final order for t t - `k - ...n..,, r 'fr k adoption by the Council 4 ' x -j t ` 2. Deny the proposal and direct staff to return on July 23 with the resolution and final order for adoption M 7TT f ; r by the Council. r- ` FISCAL NOTES f F ~ 'v a E ~ No direct fiscal impact to the city. k ~ - - - A ' 4 .I Z tr - L, n f ,y i i V * f x - hq t } t a - 9 1 'l 1 J ad y - i r~ r L , ' - - ; ~ I - . - - - - , ~ , ~ ~ - , - , , , I , " , i . _ - - - ` ~ Y~Y JJ 4 f`t - t k "i N' r - r f 7 ie f i f4 f i s i 4 1 J - t { * Y h Y , 12 . : r , - ~ ~ , - . I . ~ , I , , _ _ ~ I - ~ - - - , , {V , " - , - f"-- , a „ - - - - V *V - 4: , - _ . z I w", a x - " t r -1111 - '4 t 1' s Zz' 'rte., c. r - 2 - n . 11, ~Y I -11, 3 y0,11 rd.- - - s r- i - "I I , , } 2 ' r - - -a - - r 4 i t r`x" 5 -r-"'~'~' .r '~i a p.rr t r - , - r - r i fi~ i : 5s - - ' C':„ 3 Agenda Item: v i Y Hearing Date: July 9 .1996 7:30 PM sY a s^r " _ - .c 4 STAFF REPORT TO THE I k ' M - - ti CITY COUNCIL II "4~ 17" ~ t ~F S "dae d lCifY OF TIjO'ACD 'k".'-r :1 FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON r„ Y = -dy A #3 \k+1 - "y Z"1 H'C - S e 1~ " SECTION 1: APPLICATION SUMMARY , f nt t t - " r i ° ` - CASES: FILE NAME: AKA Business i Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 96-0002 { a € s K PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan text amendment Ma - to modify ing c_nacinn a_nd !ocatinn rtritaria inr t_anaraI t_nmmorcinl L- F !and uses. K~' 11 APPLICANT: AKA Business Services OWNER: Same -tI ~ 5~ , ' - f 10626 SW Barbur Blvd. a . '-"1j ~ Portland, OR 97280 ~ u ! ' ~r c s - . ~ 4f COMPREHENSIVE -V ~y' - " y PLAN N 4 - _4> DESIGNATION: NIA l' ~s 't ZONING ~~"~r~ rf , G DESIGNATION: N/A w; 'M~~ z LOCATION: Citywide a~ j LY - t ; E ,y $ ~ Y x APPLICABLE F x- { $ f REVIEW xTg , j ,v CRITERIA: Statewide Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11 and 12; Oregon Administrative Rule s 660-12; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1(a), 1.1.1(c), 2.1.1, 5.4, j ' Y k ~ ~ ~ x r µ ` 6.1.1, 8.1.1 and 12.2.1(2); Community Development Code Chapter ; Y t zr 18.30. " ~ SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: t x~ " - r " The Planning Commission heard this proposal on May 20 and recommends by a vote of 5- s h` ~ d ; % - = 2 that the City Council deny CPA 96-0002. The majority of Commissioners do not favor ¢ , r a I malting a legislative text change to a review criterion that would apply citywide when there g " w~ P ' j is a quasi-judicial process available to the applicant for changing the zoning on his t , ~ x k , 4 `w property. The minutes from the hearing are included as Attachment A. M j ~ m~,4 r 1P s a,r, STAFF REPORT CPA 96-0002 Page 1 a"` a a, , i"' h 3_ IiR V10'--' ''X4~ .R- LAG ..S .,,^^.b. .<7~°".d"« i",'#:.~"l.•'3~:";, vk';' s` "`i;7r: ° ' ~e-g"iri.";~nws C'. A'''„r J - } fir- r• `r'r. - r^ 7 T 4 -..ar"`11' ' t " 'I? - " " ,1 " L' : ~L ' ii ~r~& ~j'..~" " ~ I L' I r, , - - -i v' ,-.-Ii~ ~ , 'I ' t'~Cf r n E-1 - t µe 7 r'- Sr`t Y t, gyp' n x - < v s_ gi~ AC { -sue Tz ,f,,,, ry -1 z , x r 7 `rt - - 4 i 3 - 'z 2r x € ^3 5N g $ t - r Y 4 F T 3~,4 Y - Y f - _ - - 1 F . - Y . M s , , - - , Mss ~ 11 ,1-1 M -11 - I'll.- ~ 1. - ~ - r? W U,- r ` ; a ss~. y- ,'~yo~t kk ~ .~o.p.>». ...L,.,.....,....,m__....~a,.4 _,~._.;.x.4._ w :..-.ue......z~..x.._,.... ..,~.^.....>......1._.__- .,-LL ,.^k .......,.~...~...~c,h.....~:b. - ,'1 j - 3 _ r 7 - A ~ v lnh Planning staff recommends that the City Council find that the proposed amendment does not satisfy all relevant review criteria and will adversely affect the health, safety and ~ welfare of the community, and that it DENY CPA 96-0002. In addition to not being able to _ . . make findings that Goal 10 and Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.1(c), 5.4 and 6.1.1 are r L Satisfied, staff is not convinced that this amendment is heeded or would be beneficial to ^ the City as a whole. , If the City Council chooses to approve CPA 96-0002, staff recommends that the following t - provision be added to section (b) of the proposal: 4, ' T Y 7 t - (v). The increased commercial area is contiguous with the existing commercial & f; t` area and is not separated by a roadway or road right-of-way. r" >k i"-- u s - Y t r K t c - This provision would help restrict expansion of General Commercial uses into adjacent } - 'i _k residential areas across roadways, which often serve as buffers between commercial and # 'v f =i residential uses. ' SECTION 111: BACKGROUND INFORMATION t ,.V<< Site History: The applicant owns 5.81 acres of land north of the intersection of Pacific r~}z ' - Highway and SW Pfaffle Street. Although this application is for a legislative text amendment S ~R ~ x ® which would apply citywide, the applicant's property would be subject to the modified { `~~1~t~ locational policy. The property has split Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations of` ~ General Commercial/C-G and Medium Density Residential/R-12. These plan and zone rz , i designations were carried over from the Washington County designations when the property ' m :r,, : was annexed to the City in 1987 as part of the South Metzger annexation. r x n 5 Y The C-G portion of the applicant's property currently contains an older building. The - _ applicant believes it will be difficult to redevelop this commercial portion of the property ` 11 without also rezoning the R-12 portion. The current ,{spacing and location criteria of Policy ~j _ E 12.2.1(2), however, restricts the siting of C-G land that is surrounded on more than two sides ; xx , } by residential districts. ! t ..,t 7,- .t, rcL r } Vicinity Information: The amendment would be applicable citywide. Staff has determined ' that, given existing zoning, the proposal could apply to 50 parcels of land in the City (Attachment B). Many of these parcels are fully developed and/or committed to their t 1 a r existing use, e.g. the Charles F. Tigard School. If zone changes are made to these ; ` ' t t ; r parcels as a result of this amendment, additional parcels could be eligible for rezoning Y r, depending on their location. s p .f ? - a 1 - s.t J Site Information and Proposal Descri to ion: The applicant proposes to modify Policy 3 12.2.1(2)(81). Currently, this criterion reads: a ' S ah ; ..'4 j 1 air, 2,,rS "i T- ' v t r r 4 T~,~ STAFF REPORT CPA 16-0002 Page 2 14 W ~ x ~ t }t :''fit; e`1- "4 ..:2:. ° »"ixy. ,M ..s ysps-±Z, y,~"y."ai :rs,{i?'~sn i:; .a".'_ °J,'?~ ,1 - ,5 P l' - _ - S R - i' { 4 F G 4. k7 1 y { _ - / u7 Z F s~, - r- r _ - L y- a T i of -r + t i^t t 3 i -2 M ',Z ~ i,~~v , , ~ _ ~ , ; ~ M ' t'r'y" -Y.F ..s _ _ _ . . - _ - k - - - - - - - - 5x "''„r• r-~ iii.- r s - - - - ! ~1 '.mss s 3 x - - - - t - - - ,s - zq - s R+ `s yEE,, , ~1 F t s 'J! riY.`Y&•- r `u - t s ; - -z a j~ e ; t, 1p, - t sS.~'r - R *-c - x h i, Z°~iY - £ I "(1) Spacing and Location v { 4i, ` , (a) The commercial area is not surrounded by residential districts on more than _x 3 { sit -~'r two sides." e z r # - 3r i ' The applicant modified his original proposal which is contained in the application submittal ' - r - dated February 23, 1996. The modified proposal, contained in the letter dated April 22, 1996, reads as follows: , t , f, ~ sx< "(1) Spacing and Location s~ Y - (a) A new commercial area is not surrounded by residential districts on more than } iwo sides. ti (b) An existing commercial area may be expanded and is not subject to (1)(a), -1- I 2 above, if the City Council finds that: s 5 r r r t ~r. 3 (1). The expanded commercial area is not surrounded by R-1, R-2, R-3.5;mot ` £ R 4.5, or R-7 districts on more than two sides; f ° i,, gin, sZ, - f:;. (ii). The increased commercial area will not adversely affect the surrounding ~ ~ ~ _ ' residential districts, h k ' z - ? x ~*n_ rya - •y a (iii). The size of the increased commercial area will allow an appropriate ft .~xx x I ~ - I buffer to be provided between uses allowed in the commercial district " r and uses allowed in the surrounding residential district(s); and it ypR ' (iv). The increased commercial area is the minimum size necessary that is £ §~s ~a j required to allow the appropriate redevelopment of the existing , x 1 7 commercial area." 4 ~ ffi , _ 4 SECTION IV: APPLICABLE -REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Ij , I r x . ~ - a, I r, STATEWIDE GOALS - I'll M " > ~ b Citizen Involvement: Goal 1 requires a citizen involvement program that ensures the r "iM ~`+w opportunity for citizens to be involved in the planning process. Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.1 and Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18 provide for citizen i t { part icipation and notice. Notice of the Planning Commission and City Council hearings were r advertised in the local newspaper and request for comments were sent to all CITs, DLCD, 2 and Metro. In addition, the proposal was presented to the CITs and their comments are x E included in Section VI of this report. This goal is satisfied. { z f , , s ' 4 ) Land Use Planning: Goal 2 requires, in part, that adopted comprehensive plans be a * t € .t ,,revised to take into account changing public policies and circumstances. The proposal 1-, F " would fine-tune existing adopted and acknowledged comprehensive plan requirements "F - e{ ~,l f {{I` a G t t STAFF REPORT CPA 96-0002 Page 3 ~z - { r s' t at #t k i t F'`'$ n- - - ..°_,_'_°"a°wr,~u~.'zr«es, ~^c., ; ° r,.,i:° a;rv~ ~.9r w n°a °:~e+*_t•. r _ E r'`.i. >r r z F - S- t- C- t I _ iV _ - A # J x vs . 0 I k:~,.,- 12 , , ; , ~ ' ~ ' -ti r 2 r r rdy r- t'€ t Y,f~ Yr 1 -a rh r~z s _ - - r , - zq ' ~X'' , x 7- - - i1 €5 x I el -s _ f p 7 { i - - 4 t Td } - i f fi E k_ y s _ 77 , z - - - - - - l~ _ ' ux f W I "I M ~A'9F z Cx a - - r t'~~xt M v .y ,YY.ns~c3 x- .TsL.'''iw.,.*~#.,.+cx. ,.._u.. _.._d_ M_.a„..,. t 5r 1 { Y 1 2 -F.t y-j ? Y4 ~ 'q - 34, YY - relating to the siting of commercial land to serve the residents of the community. This goal is 3~ satisfied. r , I,,- I J x Economic Development: Goal 9 requires that adequate opportunities for economic - , development be provided by the community. The amendment would increase - commercial opportunities through expansion of existing General Commercial areas. This ri CZD to 0' 4 goal is satisfied. v Housing: Goal 10 requires that plans shall encourage the availability of adequate a k r ti numbers of needed housing units at various price ranges and rent levels and allow for flexibility of housing location, type and density. The amendment would make it easier to expand existing General Commercial land use designations within multi-family + residential areas. This may result in more land being rezoned from residential to commercial x" a- - uses, thus reducing the amount of land available for a variety of housing types and densities. Though each quasi-judicial proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan and X I change the zoning on a particular parcel must be evaluated according to this goal, the l expansion of commercial areas into multi-family residential areas would reduce opportunities ' for the City to make available various types of housing units. For this reason, staff cannot ~ . '7 t l make a finding that this goal is satisfied. , ,x J F t T Public Facilities and Services: Goal 11 requires that development be guided and , L supported by types and levels of public facilities and services appropriate for the f _ needs and requirements of the area to be served. The city has adequate facilities and x 4 P services available to existing General Commercial land use districts. Any proposed Y ' f expansion of these areas would be required to provide additional services, if needed, to ."~M~~`~~t maintain the existing levels. This goal is satisfied. i j"-I r P ~ Transportation: Goal 12 requires that the city provide and encourage a safe, k « convenient and economic transportation system. The amendment would be less xy ~~r- fi X restrictive for allowing the expansion of General Commercial areas adjacent to residential . . z 4 areas. It does not affect the criteria that require adequate transportation facilities be - available to serve these commercial land uses. The amendment would not cause an unsafe - ~ t t and inconvenient transportation system. This goal is satisfied. f 4 t - " 4 ~ s u - ~x C..!" COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL OR STATE STATUTES OR GUIDELINES _ rN l Oregon Administrative Rule: Section 660-12-060 states that plan amendments which significantly affect a transportation facility shall assure that allowed land " S uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity and level of service of the ~ ~ I I ~ ' ; ' facility. The proposed amendment would not result in generating any additional traffic. It I would only modify the criterion for locating General Commercial areas to allow for expansion of existing areas, if all other criteria are met as well. All requests for quasi- ~ udicial Comprehensive Plan ma and zone changes for specific are analyzed f P property 1 and evaluated for compliance to transportation policies and rules, including this state rule. - 1~ , The city reviews all requested quasi-judicial changes for compliance to this rule and makes a I r determination based upon that review. Findings of compliance or noncompliance to this Ii ; r 3 + a o- 'vM ! s-- - - a _ y STAFF REPORT CPA 86-0002 } ; t Page 4 K _ r- y - r i! - .c:. x' _rn - . °t z• , - r.;.^%ol .o'er s %T ':„`-'~.-x. . t t 1 2 £4 1 E"',' . # r ' ! A R- y ,r' r F1 & - -q t A - ; -i - f t3 S f - h 'i x1i N - 4, t d . '777,7 1 - _ - _ f i }{{F r - - - iii K t- - - - - j - T -4 c ~ y F ...;et'^' •`-w~.es_ - .a .«3~:~.i._...r: .._....~t: _..._..,...a,. _ - ..r, _z.._. _ l r Y,~ r rule would be made following a traffic analysis of the specific proposal. This policy is satisfied. sf, COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES - General Policies: Policy 1.1.1(a) requires that legislative changes be consistent - with statewide planning goals and the regional development plan. The findings above address statewide goals. There is no applicable adopted regional plan. Metro was sent a T request for comments. This policy is satisfied. General Policies: Policy 1.1.1(c) requires that the Comprehensive Plan and the Community Development Code be kept current with the needs of the community. The i applicant states that there is a current need to strengthen the city's economic base and maintain viable existing General Commercial areas. This proposal encourages ° redevelopment of existing General Commercial areas. Staff agrees that the proposal could result in more efficient development or redevelopment of existing General Commercial areas, assuming that adjacent residential areas are not adversely affected by the expanded r j use. The applicant has not, however, submitted evidence that the City needs to strengthen' its economic base and maintain existing commercial land, and therefore that the -47 Comprehensive Plan policies protecting the encroachment of commercial uses into a residential areas should be suspended. The City, in fact, has a relatively high assessed value per capita as compared to other area jurisdictions, which reflects a healthy economic r base. Staff cannot, therefore, make a finding that this policy is satisfied. } Citizen Involvement: Policy 2.1.1 states that the City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an % St opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. A request for comments was sent to all City CIT individuals and the Planning Commission and City ~-w x Council hearings were legally advertised. In addition, the proposal was presented at all CIT meetings during May of 1996, and comments are included in Section VI of this report. This t policy is satisfied. Economy: Policy 5.4 states that the city shall ensure that new commercial and industrial development not encroach into residential areas that have not been designated for commercial and industrial uses. The proposed amendment would be less I restrictive in allowing the expansion of existing General Commercial land uses adjacent to residential districts. The current restriction to not allow new General Commercial areas in residential areas would remain in force. The expansion of existing commercial areas would f be conditional on evaluation of impacts to the residential areas. z The applicant interprets this policy as stating that land cannot be used for commercial uses # until it is designated on the Comprehensive Plan map for such uses; therefore, this policy is J" satisfied because the proposed amendment would not allow new commercial development from encroaching into residential areas before the land has been designated for this use. A a quasi-judicial plan map and zone change approval would still be needed to redesignate land for commercial use. While staff agrees that the text amendment by itself would not cause ns commercial development to encroach into residential areas, we interpret the intent of Policy c- r STAFF REPORT CPA 96-0002 Page 5 { I- !'s 77 i - 3 7' - - - - - - rte, x n --7 7 Y - - - - - y _ 5.4 as restricting map redesignation of residential areas to new commercial and industrial uses. Because the proposed amendment would facilitate expansion of existing General Commercial areas into residential areas, staff cannot make a finding that this policy is satisfied. Housing: Policy 6.1.1 requires that the city provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various prices and rent levels. It is primarily ay i implemented through OAR 660-07, the Metropolitan Housing Rule. The rule requires the city maintain sufficient residential buildable land to provide the opportunity for at least 50% of new units to be attached single family or multi-family housing and to provide for an overall density of ten units per acre. The amendment would make it easier to expand existing General Commercial land use designations into multi-family residential areas. This may result in more land being rezoned from residential to commercial uses, thus reducing the j mow: amount of land available to housing units. The restriction of locating new General Commercial land in areas surrounded by residential districts, however, remains unchanged. ii This proposal by itself will not cause the city to drop out of compliance with the housing rule; t' r and the city must review all requested quasi-judicial comprehensive plan map amendments and zone changes for compliance to the rule and make a determination based upon that review. The al..endment would, however, provide greater opportur i y for use of land 6 currently designated for multi-family residential to be changed to General Commercial. This T' could result in the incremental loss of the opportunity for diversity of housing densities and ' s k types. For this reason, staff cannot make a finding that this policy is satisfied. + Transportation: Policy 8.1.1 states that the City shall plan for a safe and efficient x , street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth _ and development. The proposed amendment would not affect the City's ability to r maintain a safe and efficient street and roadway system. It modifies one criteria of many for amending the Comprehensive Plan and zoning maps. An application for such map ; changes to a specific property must still meet this policy by demonstrating that expected trips will not cause an unsafe traffic situation or reduce the level of service of roadways below the minimum acceptable levels. This policy is satisfied. c t M ti" Locationai Criteria: Policy 12.2.1(2)(B.1) sets out the spacing n p__ a and location criteria for General Commercial land use areas. This is the section the proposed amendment seeks to modify (see Section III above). The intent of this section is to protect adjacent ` residential districts from the impact of retail commercial activity. The amendment would T allow the expansion of existing General Commercial areas into residential areas only in k the following circumstances: If the City Council finds that the commercial area is not - surrounded on more that two sides by single-family districts; the increased commercial area will not adversely affect the residential areas; the increased commercial area will allow an appropriate buffer between the commercial and surrounding residential area(s); t ` and the commercial area is the minimum size necessary to allow for redevelopment. The proposed amendment, through its provisions under section (b), seeks to retain protection of adjacent single-family residential areas. The Comprehensive Plan in general and this policy in particular, however, attempt to protect all residential areas equally from encroachment by commercial areas. This amendment assumes that multi-family ( L 7 STAFF REPORT CPA 96-0062 Page6 F[ 17 Y^' F is v .^~.flmr z r 'i£K:r r :.r1; r , - - - - - a _ _ _ . t -i. ~ - F_F~, - Iv , ` , , " ~ - I , 1. I . I ~ ~ ; ~ I I , . 1, I - I I ~1 I - ~ - S' - - - S- - _ - - - _ W" - - - - - i5. 1 - - k _ = 3 t - ~."$iiSs ^wu bA.crr.F.+~..iaeJ.i ~s..m uc m... . ...ue..«__.. s ...w-.,_ - w I mow...»_~.. _ +v fu. «....c j ' - .m,G. F ~ K 1Yc residential is not as deserving of the same protection as single-family residential. Staff 4 , ' believes both types should be treated equally if the City's intent is to maintain protection of residential areas. Staff cannot, therefore, make a finding that this policy is satisfied. 5, COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: `w _ - 4^ - - - - - Procedures for Decision Making- Legislative- Chapter 18.30 establishes procedures for consideration of legislative changes to the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, implementing ordinances and maps. Section 18.30.120 lists the factors upon which the Planning Commission and City Council shall base their era decisions. The factors and responses are as follows: ti The aaa,aw,uC planning yogis and giiiaeiines adopied under Oregon Revised t h _ Statutes Chapter 197. These standards are addressed in Section IV under I - Statewide Goals in this staff report. r 2. Any federal or state statutes or guidelines found applicable. The state's ' %k' ' Transportation Planning Rule is addressed in Section IV under'Compliance with F Federal or State Statutes or Guidelines'. u;{ { 3. Applicable plans and guidelines adopted by the Metropolitan Service District There are no applicable plans or guidelines adopted by Metro. F -P s LL >~tqi a F 4. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and map. These standards are _F i addressed in Section IV under 'Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Policies'. I b ~ ~.''S' r3 ~r f s 5. The applicable provisions of the implementing ordinances. The implementing f - ordinances are contained in the Tigard Community Development Code, which are ~y addressed in this section of the staff report. T r x 6. Consideration may also be given to proof of a change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or c, implementing ordinance which is the subject of the application. The applicant 4 fr states that the Comprehensive Plan contains a mistake by requiring that all General ` Commercial map designations be surrounded on no more than two sides by a ~ _ r t~r ` residential district. No reason is given for the mistake argument. Although the applicant gives no reason or substantiating information for his contention that a mistake was made in the Comprehensive Plan, the applicant has satisfied this code section. It is satisfied because the first five standards have been adequately addressed in this staff report and the sixth standard is optional only. p z [ F, , E SECTION V• AGENCY COMMENTS ` - ODOT reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: Staff chooses not to„! comment on this legislative text change regarding the City's locational criteria for General 3 Commercial areas. ODOT does evaluate and comment on parcel-specific quasi-judicial x 4 r i + STAFF REPORT CPA 96-0002 Page 7 y , i xi ,i,~,- -~~.~~,'~~:~~~',~~,~-4~?,-,,~,',:~~, ~ , 1 , - " 117 I t, - i-7 _ _ _,f a S- } P-- L - - - - - i 1 r } Y d f Y S r 3 r - 17 11 t to - - H t,y. - - - g -s - `i}'.ETf~'3 A~, L 8.}'~ -0 - ..,y "aµ- is . . _ _ - ) 3" jS.,~t - n 3.c v J......u:.~ ec1„v...na -_ro....L„a wat..1._« +wr.a.-.~.~.r"'3..SN: .~`~'✓b ~ ' "..~Y k - eu `Y su'fw.Ux£m~.Y...+T'.Yj.:..td.3,aww^":c..»......u+w-ma.Y.:~3 s,: w* ms`s requests for comprehensive plan amendments for their compliance to OAR 660-12, the ~ T k w Transportation Planning Rule. 7 . B :n ~ L -4 r t Metro reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: "The proposed , , 'r P ~'i'f-d - , amendment would appear to permit a greater mix of uses in Tigard by giving greater h flexibility in locating commercial uses adjacent to residential uses. Metro supports the s k'~~,Izl p, Y efforts underway in the local jurisd'.ctions to expand the opportunities for increasing the } p mix of uses in a community." r -l , s4' 4, I 1 rN k ~V,v fir r 4 , SECTION VI OTHER COMMENTS 3 n , 3 :"1 "r r''"is aoai and offer the following CO v e Ci i s have reviewed this prop0 mments: [ In I I 2 t§ X The South CIT heard the proposal at the meeting of May 1 and have not commented on it. ~§~'f ; Y - Y fl' j The Central and West CITs heard the proposal on May 7. The members expressed ' e' -11 " concern about changing the text for allowing the expansion of General Commercial areas. a fiy They would prefer the City retain the existing criterion and suggested the applicant first t v x < Wv;.,; :a exhaust the existing avenue, i.e. aquasi-judicial plan amendment, to change the zoning , ` ' on his land. The East CIT heard the proposal on May 8 and have no comments on it. b, ka x _ 13- $s 'r r, _ wr a3 @?' :W,'!; s--' Ir 'CP 3 tie I h's. - `r s zt~, } ~,r n June 24, 1986 ~ - r s,-,. r z h PREPARED BY: Ra Valone DATE t C, ~F , Associate Planner ~ ,I r x ~s } Lc 3' ~,tt --t i ? 7 x Y . ; -s CfhF ~c~n".c.lU~ JSt(7e 26.1996 ng , 11 _ DATE fl APPROVED BY: Nadine Smith " * Planning Manager 3 mac; z a $ Ca *1 11110 4 ` 9 ~ I IWph glCPA96O3« ,ply - tWY'*'}~' f - ~ L " ~"%-~`W` 01~ - ~ rr { F2 ta`i ` - , --r' L E k _8 t~. f ~A , 5 - f- Yf 1 - - 1 `Lyx - `f i ,9 , - - i " 1~,,~. ,T_ Ir , I " ~4~.' T'~~;,;~~ ~ . , r, k - - - y gc.,i, yX - F- ✓ - - - r j~w~ j,~' y STAFF REPORT CPA 9G-0002 Page 8 )t Ct I ?xaL'aa:+-x Kl°" r:Z 7°-"'",~ ;kf^'YS.. r. w:r^+.^^^.^.+m+:w..~Z:s'gXe .1 +.t --fi r'£i r Fe e o- f s W Pi M u y 1 + IV r~- fQ, %m . E , - , . . , , ; - L'~-" - - I,-,' --i -1 ~ ~ , . . ; , j - -Y-',- 2 i .~r , , , , , " , ~ , - - , , , - , 'M , r r i d ,r,3rX~- t ,F - - -z k - - , I- , - , - I " - ~ " , ~ , , , ` , _ - - , " ~ - I t ti t % _ x t ' ~f x } w . I Is r r - - s4 k r 11 ~1 ' su vk spa - 1 - "I'll, I'll 2LFMTY WA { ] m Y i - 5 r a, s zt - _ asr _ a.,',i "9,.K.,,, w L v. .u _LL a ATTACHMENT A ,ice _ rt t~ ,as fit{ J} r _ ° -5~ MW , ~ CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ; --a ~ - - 4 Regular Meeting Minutes fi a, 4 t May 20, 1996r .ig x „a 1. CALL TO ORDER c r h7 F f e Q President Wilson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was held in 2 t - 3 } the Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. A f r 2. ROLL CALL g, r 1a a 'F Commissioners Present: President Wilson; Commissioners Collson, Griffith, ' u Ilan) 'Pa dge"tt and Scolar v` 44x h t 4- ri`3 J t ' s as -111 .1 zR -s t- Commissioner DeFrang arrived late. : - u'~ 2a F I r-. n Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Anderson q Staff Present: Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager, Ray Valone, Associate Planner, Nels Mickaelson, Associate Planner, Jerree Ga nor, ? Y J v`~*z n < Planning Commission Secretary y , 3& a` -I- . i - x -t--~ t- al's - ~ 4 ; ~=sz,,fx~ 3. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES, Commissioner Holland moved and Commissioner Padgett seconded a motion to r:'"; c am'; r approve the May 6, 1996, meeting minutes as submitted. A voice vote was taken ' r 4' and the motion passed unanimously. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS sip None 1- ` 5. PUBLIC HEARING r ! a mss 1 - .t t & 5 ~ , t J Eit , ' 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-0002 AKA BUSINESS 'W4 SERVICES x ~~,~,,q z REQUEST: Amend the text of policy 12.2.1(2)(1 a) of the Comprehensive Plan F - , F , F ~ to modify the spacing and locational criteria for General Commercial land uses. ~d ; = LOCATION: City Wide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: K ' ` - IM" g ~ , , Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11 and 12; Tigard Comprehensive Plan ,fi , P ; policies 1.1.1(a), 1.1.1(c), 2.1.1, 5.4, 6.1.1, 8.1.1 and 12.2.2; Tigard E ~i'7, Community Development Code chapter 18.30; and Oregon Administrative Rule Chapter 660, Division 12. ,'r ` s, sx STAFF REPORT r- ~ ~ Ray Valone presented the staff report on behalf of the City. He explained that this r y r' - was a proposal to amend Policy 12.2.1(2)(1a) of the locational criteria sections of M; f f o 5 1'114- - ? PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - May 20, 1996 - Paget s - - T' ,1~ A' ~tF e - ~ s - ~,I~ r, -'"~s- r -aa {t - Y rl ' crf tr - ......--raw v=-snc+.x ~rt•'3 :x s..+ ss ~a A ,q ,A tk-, `5 _ a } " - r ``fi' 'fir f-+ y- Yy t zit -'~z, t - - r 4.1'' , s j ::1 Ir r i sit - - > y ~r ,fv r+# t t t't'" = f» t , ~i ` g - - - i~ - !fir - 4 ~ `'s s aa, a _ > 3 1 F - - - - F c .u u.,...._.. t . O"`,-a} 3 c 1 s:s'a - , ~ r"' - "w s - ` - - - 4' - - ..,~,.,Cm12 4 k - _Y { - _ - - - - - - ~`"a9z33 0 s„1- at t I o ti. _T c t~ m. ,,~.l_ a~ `4 _ , z~M - - $a F f. 1 4 4.3 y Ch .t~ ka - F `.4; ~ _ the Comprehensive Plan. He advised that this policy is one criterion used to , 0, I analyze and evaluate Comprehensive Plan amendments - the proposed `v. a, r edesi nati 0 n and r ez in p.::, : on of land to allow for 9 ener l a commercial u ses 9 only. He ''•x ~ said it would apply to all such amendments, and therefore, is a citywide , .11.11 application. a v 4=0 a a Valone said that the existing provision now reads, "the commercial area is not surrounded by residential districts on more than two sides". He summarized the FYI ? proposed policy wording as stating that the existing restriction will still apply to new ~ s - commercial areas, but an existing area may expand if the City Council finds the t t following: s ` - [ t T q ~ l8hex 1. the expanded commercial area is not surrounded by R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R4.5, R-7 °-z..I - - •3 --strir_s on more man z; side r"- ~ - f 2. the increased commercial area will not adversely affect the surrounding x s Y. 2 residential districts x., 3. the size of the increased commercial area will allow an appropriate buffer to be. r provided between uses allowed , 4. the increased commercial area is the minimum size necessary that is required Ru xr to allow the appropriate redevelopment of the existing commercial area ; v ax f - xi Valone said the applicant owned a parcel alon Pacific Hwy. which is a split zoning r~ of C-G in the front and R-12 in the back, but the proposal 9s not about the site in iN x, s'* ' 111 _W ~ particular. Valone provided history of the parcel and explained how the existing . t ~ ` - , ~ t policy language could prevent the owner from expanding the C-G portion of the v E" r site into the multi-family portion of the area. x 11 i , Y Valone said that staff finds the current proposal does not meet the relative criteria, . , . ' t including State Goal 10 the housing ~ 41a~ r - commeial into multi-family residential areas wo d reduce the opportunity for the - x t * city to make available housing units at various price ranges/rent levels and allow i s for flexibility of location, type, and density of houses. He said our Comprehensive r `zfi t a Plan Policy 5.4, which states that new commercial and industrial development will f _ , } . ~ h not encroach into residential areas, is not satisfied because this proposal would l } t help to facilitate expansion of commercial areas into residential districts. r s Valone said that staff could also not make a finding that Comprehensive Plan j " r t r, s Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied. He said that although the amendment itself would not - - - , cause the city to drop off compliance with the Metropolitan Housing Rule, which " tir requires 10 units an acre and over 50% multi-family housing, the expansion of ' F y general commercial areas into multi-family areas would result in incremental loss is ~.f 1, I ' of housing opportunities for the city. T T T }o~,,~it,t` x T _ Y+F F } _ { 4. - ~,yi 1 Z 'I r~, ~f PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - May ?0, 1996 -Page 2 - e r - r a , 5 r Y - -Y. k 3r 3 R Z Sl ¢ - - - 1 I' y- §a } _ - d - y- F .i" lh I { 7~ 3'3 " F1 f ~7'~ F 3^ j1 r -r - - i r xi 7.1c, f r- r xj Q a } 3 fi ~ * ~ ,;~'~A,`~ Kt_~Zf~,~` :11,'~*`V_, ~ , ~ , ,f~ ce , - I ~,~"L. ~ , , _-L ~ - , .L , - , , 01% , , - . ~ _ *!~,,`R!'~Zp,Q'-.,,~ '!z'.- ~ 8 -,V,--- r W; I ~ , ~ . a',~- ~ - ~ - - , , - I ~ . , I - - , . , " , ~ : , ,`~'~-!t"7 1-~: , ' ' r : ~ _ , ~T ' € - I M_ , ~ _ , , I I " 1 - , ~ I - . I , I - , I I , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ I ~ - - ~ 1 2 - 111. ~ ~ ~ , , ~ M ~ , I , r . I k i ,~P. I ~ I - ` , ~ -I- ~ - I . ~ - I - I , , - -1 - I I - I ~ I f s - - - - - - r c W ~M ~a a Ke r ;a er x ..:o L~ kE t kx"' # 'e - - - - - - - - _ - k~;$ - - g - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J 3«i aT a- i ~ ' , _ ~ ^tws -s - . _ -.,a,..a.k.c. .__s-° __...,..e. ex..,._..,.,,,.....r,,,..:_; ...;_..~,5,.,._v_... ...°m..1., _~...e,,.,...;n....~,..:..~..._..a..._., 1 S ~~a tfXw~ r w z {4 f~, t , ` 71 F f' - in regards to policy 12.2.1(2), the locational criteria, Valone stated that under the & "I proposal, multi-family and single family residential areas are held to a different # 7 X standard. He said staff believes both should be treated equally, if the city's intent [ -11 r ? ~ s is to maintain protection of all residential areas. _ ~ r~ ' , a K Valone advised that requests for comments were sent to ODOT and Metro, and ° ` ' - r' 7 that all CIT mailin list members were notified. The was also resented 9 proposal P i t to all of the CITs during their May meetings. He stated that ODOT chose not to 6 t comment on the text because the agency evaluates each parcel specifically. He t„ L Y said that Metro responded that they supported the proposal because it would t, r appear to permit a greater mix of uses. 7 k ~r" t Valone said the South and East CITs had no comments on the proposal. He said the Central and West CITs expressed concern about changing the text for locating _ general commercial areas. s f , k F - _ Valone advised that staff recommended the Planning Commission recommend Uz ' r denial of the proposal, because the applicant has not met all principal criteria and Y A j has not made a convincing argument that this amendment is beneficial to the city. N. 'f ~ - Y, -1) -Al He said the applicant could apply for aquasi-judicial comp plan amendment to a - , a the zoning on the manner as allowed in the comprehensive case for construing policy 12.2.1 in I k k 7 t. P Plan In response to a question from President Wilson, Valone answered that this v,,,4 proposal only applied to general commercial areas. Valone then used an 4 ~ " overhead to demonstrate both the existing policy and the proposed policy. He = - ry ~j , r showed that, under the proposal, the criteria would be met if there were single # r family residential areas on up to two sides and multi-family on the third side. ' r~ k President Wilson asked if expansion would follow the tax lot lines, or if the t r applicant could re draw the property line to avoid more than 2 sides. Valone F- 4, answered that it was possible. -L Commissioner DeFrang asked about streets that divide areas and if the streets ,rk ,I make a definite division between lots and zones. Valone answered that the ' "k? applicant agreed to include a provision that there couldn't be a street or right-of-` C ei t way between the existing general commercial area and the proposed expansion r --"-'--",f~')~, - i area. h r i 4 - h i 9 j - Valone explained that Goal 10 (offering housing at various prices and rent levels) _ - € " could be affected by this proposal. , l z r ~ Commissioner Padgett said that, instead of looking at "yet available" development, F ~,1, ~ - ~ the Commission should look at the development potential from the original build- t 1& , f ~ y'` , s - 1 x t r, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - May Z0, 1996 -Page 3 F t s r - r-- S s „f - I` - 2 - »l xc affi..-,: 2:.r J.~ .4t ; f e.. x -x.v ' -Ift* 4 ~ S4- ` - i^ C F t fps ~j agk - -'~s P' i y -f i E - f ZJ ,S -4 { -'f -1 r' ark, - ? t _ - rty _ Y s A _ X ~ 1f a. e : ~ 7 - xt P x -yl Y~ - _ t t - >t t } . - - , - I ~ 4 , - . . ~ - , ~ - , I I _ I ~ M, . , "T'. , i r~ I - I - ~Y` i-- _ _ 5 1 - - 8 _ zR S-- - - - - ZFn t' - ~ a t §4,w-- .i,»x......._..._wa aa...,,.L.._.~.ba....... ,v,a.,... .,,...,.s,..._..._ r.a.a,..:.,.w.. : 1 - 'tea c 5 rt,N sC' g. a - - f6 *10% out. He believes the city's obligation is to provide economic opportunity, including _ iK ; what is already here (not just from this point on). = ~ ~ APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION 1 Michael Robinson, 900 SW 5th, Suite 2300, Portland, OR 97204-1268, spoke on 4 behalf of the applicant. He explained that the proposal would clarify when an x t existing general commercial plan map designation could be expanded. He said = =Y - " - ; 4L - 11 the current language was difficult to interpret and it would be better to have more fi 3 certain criteria. He said the proposed change would give some guidance for an r4 existing C-G map designation to be surrounded on more than 2 sides by higher 1. , density residential designations. He advised that the proposal doesn't apply to - Y new commercial areas - it applies only to existing C-G areas. - v' D..bincnn noted that the applirant wnlllLj like t0 chance the eXIStInQ R-12 f a. E.=... designation of his property to C-G. He said the parcel is a flag lot with a split zone ',3 and the only access is through an existing driveway. He said the applicant has an r ' { approved site development review on the C-G portion, but it is a constrained site - r ` the building and parking are squeezed on to a smaller site than is necessary. - ti. r " ~ rv _ ~-`f, ; q - Y i.F - tY £ ¢ Robinson stated that people who don't want to buy other property to make this t t sib, change, or don't want to change their existing property designation, aren't going to t1 * be affected by this proposal. ,a I " W-_ Robinson said, at one time, he thought an appropriate limitation on this criteria "s,3 I "I r might be in those situations of split zoning, but he decided it was too narrow a X m,_ ~ provision to put in the comp plan. He believes the city shouldn't adopt plan map y,_---? t amendments to deal solely with a single site -the plan map amendment should be - y U generally acceptable for the rest of the community. He said the applicant's ~-M ~ i„ proposal will strike a balance. A ~ t L if;, t Robinson reminded the Commission that, even if this text amendment is approved, , p s 3 all other applicable criteria would still apply to the quasi judicial plan map e, A~ ! - ~ E h r I ✓y applications. R ¢ k ' Robinson disagreed with the staff report that this proposal would make it easier to rezone commercial property. He also disagreed that this amendment treats multi- >M1y family areas differently from single family areas. Robinson said he suggested t modified language to reduce the scope of impact of the amendment. . Robinson also does not believe this application does anything to reduce protection - x ,..,:.„_u-_.' of multi-family areas. He remarked that the comp plan already distinguishes I, t ~ between low density designations and medium, medium-high, and high density t 4 ' F designations. He noted that the code still provides for buffering to maximize the t privacy of low density residential areas. z `w ' f ~ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - May 20, 1996 - Page 4 ~i i - dS - i jh,. f -dam 6 { Y' 2 11 I I . _ a- r _ - _ - _-x - r - - r 1 t x , 4~ t t § t S J_ --~44 ,~,V-3- L 1, - - , L1111", ,-_J'1"Y- , ~ ,'"3 fi ~k , x_ q F 1 ) L, C F -w,7~ z t <r - r 1 I N. J r- n ~ " - ~ , , - Ed 4 ' Mrw... ' - rv "d - - - . - F.. 'i } t - - - , 3~ FT-T; U*'--,R_--'-'- a-~~AA-~,,~~~"-,-,..~-,~,-.~-~~,-~,:--~,~:~~~,,I - ~ I , - , I I ~M%V' y -1 - - - - - " . ~ . : , , ] Agri ~ r ~ agg _ - i'~3Y1'~b Y _ _ _ _ W 'C 2 -'4 3 - f - d - J_- - - 7 IT ~ Mf - ^ea1..=_c"z ,..w ......--....vx_..:r,.le.~..,..._,......v _.,..slY...~.,..~....zs,a.,ae- _.su.....-__..._ 1--1___._.._ _ t t; v, t ';t~ to, S t ~ t NiR 1," # F a F t h Ia p, ` L._..9 Robinson referred to State Planning (_Oal #10 and said hn lines riot believe the i s t application does anything to prevent this goal from being met. He said a future applicant coming in for a quasi-judicial map application would still have to prove - this planning goal is met. He then cited a number of existing criteria in the ' Comprehensive Plan that protect residential areas from the impacts of C-G, t~ designations. s t Robinson said he agrees with the conditions of approval listed on page 2 of the staff report. He also noted that the Planning Commission could recommend t approval to the City Council with modifications. i ` ` Commissioner DeFrang remarked that she thought it was safer and more ` Y { conservative to make decisions on a case by case basis, rather than to run the risk; M~ of "stepping on residential toes". Robinson said the problem is that there is no _ s assurance about what it takes to construe things in a flexible manner and it is easy F ~ . to step on residential toes with the language as it exists today. 2 `s ' President Wilson said he was concerned about approving a zone change before " ~ , l`,p ` : seeing any site development review plans. Robinson said it was difficult to write completely objective criteria, but this proposal would give an applicant a better idea ?'k - - 5 u~~' ' about what has to be satisfied. ~ _ , 3 z s r _ x` , President Wilson asked staff if there was a zone change under this proposed ' # ~ : language, would there be more stringent site development review criteria because ¢ ~ : -r, - - ft~ c5 r s ~ it projects into a residential area. Ray Valone answered that staff would defer to 7z -JAIN, x the code- Dick Bewersdorff said that applicants are required to meet with the _L '4~. y r Y a 2 ' -I I 5 neighborhood prior to making an application. He said that the applicant normall F 1- -11 I 3 addresses the neighborhood's concerns, which tends to result in less objections to 0~ 2 r" L { - ' the project. _ _ 3 a M 3 . _ t ' PUBLIC TESTIMONY - IN FAVOR ` r t` G 1 r" -X- VIA Gene Mayberry, 13490 SW Watkins, Tigard, OR 97223, asked about possible r,° x r zone changes in his neighborhood. President Wilson informed him that the 4 '1l r application was not a change to any particular property and suggested he contact r city staff to talk about his property. i , f - - PUBLIC TESTIMONY - IN OPPOSITION 3a ` Debbie Hart, 12615 SW Watkins Ave., Tigard, OR 97223, expressed concern W f t about the affect on livability for lots on Watkins Ave. rI°"' s , 4 Martha Bishop, 10530 SW Cook Lane, Tigard, OR 97223, read a letter to the ; - 'i 1' r ° Commission. She requested that the Planning Commission revise the t ' "11 ~ t , comprehensive text amendment as follows: 11-1 J yy ..w' 7+5.x. F - - 'Y P A ' ~ if = PLANNING COMMISSION tifEETING MINUTES - May 20,1996- Page5 - Y g , v Gr _t" d 4'-`s r r C 1 ys; ids r`h 3 ° s f F ~ - 'vj 5ti y t - t }3 4 - r`- - _ it - 1 r T - - 4- 'rw 1 y~ a. ' -r r r - -,a fF c _ o r n C -`Y { 1 t~~ C - -"l , ~ - ~ ~ ~ , , - ~ - ' - ~ ~ , , C i . ~ , _r ' Ir _7=.- J, , ~ - , 1;'1 1~`~~4~;K__PNI_ L. . ~ - -I -r z- _ - < a } { k - ,.C - yn`"6 i t 6 ~l't' sM` - 3 - t F3, Y . p Y t. 1 _ - s _ _ t} - 41 '-rf - a'Y i' J F _ G~ 4 -F 4 - 7 Y L y y ' t F _ - € f 5 a h\ 11 I t- ,-ti€ - , - - - , - s -z s, % t -ICRA }.Y } i R .p z, AS Atvg-L LyL f .1'^ 3 5'``4. ll' ar.s. .-wa ®...wwa..t~l.r...s.u.....c zma«r.....av v~...cM.wh r vY..- t ` s 4" y3'44' °x t -(7 ewvuaat.'_Rmr s, - 'rte - f`' l.~- 71_F 9 Y rv.=dr ~ ,P $ 5 I + ~s, , 'T he three side rule shall apply to multi-family uses only. A parcel with two sides or more, with single family zoning, and shall not be permitted to be rezoned to commercial. While the primary access for the commercial use be a major collector p A - or arterial, as stated in the City of Tigard code, if any portion of the proposed ~ property is abutting or accessing upon a minor collector or local road, then the I v property cannot be rezoned." r,= P P Duane Meyer, 13210 SW Watkins, Tigard, OR 97223, compared the proposal to F ; , "dynamiting the lake to get one fish." He is against the amendment changes being citywide._ It { - , David Rutan, 13570 SW Watkins Ave., Tigard, OR 97223, signed up to speak, but + r a . rhnca not to do - r f Several people in the audience had questions about their specific piece of ' . Jf -1 } property. The Planning Commission took a 10 minute break to allow these people q sue- an opportunity to talk to staff. ~x 3 1. ; PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED° * j fi ~`"1} Commissioner Griffith asked staff if the City of Tigard have a zero housing loss : regulation, as far as zone changes are concerned. Ray Valone answered that1 y ° i -rY r. ~ there is not a requirement to replace housing units on a ratio basis. He stated that t t >r 3 a ~ - yr,,-' ,~w kaki, ~ the Metro Housing Rule currently requires at least 10 units per acre of housing r *,r"s,, r k , opportunity and the City is at 10.45. ~ ~ -Rg 7 Sri - xM 7N z Commissioner Collson remarked that this application seemed to be replacing one ` , z} piece of ambiguous criteria for another not quite as ambiguous. He was not inf favor of change something for the sake of change. He said he had a problem , 4 + changing code for the whole city, based on a need in one particular area. zf', -1 ~ Commissioner Padgett said he liked a lot of the new language, but he did not like a c # change in the rule of three, allowing one of the three sides to be multi-family. He I ~ £ , Y said the code allowed for two types of changes, quasi judicial and legislative. He fi - a f 'Y r a believes that to effect a legislative change, there needs to be a crying need ' , citywide with a particular part of the code. M `t I ' e yt ! n s r President Wilson said this application was a good attempt to clarify the code. He t t F ~ g said he would tend to support it if it was an improvement, but he would look for 0- u r further improvement. r r ' ' " Commissioner Holland said the application made a lot of sense. He said he likes }z' € F the idea of the fifth condition in the staff report, that the increased area has to be ; ' x 4 w,~ contiguous, not separated by a roadway or right-of-way. He thinks the changes I < - , are much more understandable. _t r , r a` I SkF { l t PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - May 20, 1996 -Page 6 iyy' a ` f f' I f. c ( 3 r ( , f v r _ h. i.T -^'n I xs~, msu.;'~^.^-' .,.,,.muu 3~°w's'7 „'a- _ - d s F t - , .3 3 7 - - r p 's x - r Y 'f 1 l fi 4 tri J;'1 Y.'' t'~ - - - but( J -~'-'~~jtz "A '/t f _ { Y i - tid+r r ~ d M , 'x t _i t / l -S , - . . -.1 , I , I R , r - - - 4 x L i 11 i ~ x s , ` -g } "s t x y .ate 4 II Y a Y u....,,.,....__W. n,.e.~a3n_..»x,,..t a:i. ;6-o",....:a..me..^a~,._-.»~....~....u-,i...+;,t , - 2 - k y ~'i 'S~ A 4 ` - ate{` se^-z* ~ D " a.A2. S::s arYx J Pl - : - Commissioner DeFrana said she was opposed to the change. She said it would s r , _ a mxt be hard to foresee what could happen. She is in favor of taking a more ~ 5 conservative approach and looking at each application on a case by case basis. r£ 5 - jjj y` 4 Commissioner Scalar agreed with Commissioner DeFrang. He prefers handing t z i things or. a case by case basis. He does want to change the status for the whole city. 11 g d I t Commissioner Griffith said he appreciated the language. He said he does not like W2 _ crisis intervention. He thinks there is some ambiguity in the current language, but K ~ ~ 2r z it has worked for a long time. > ' d T ~ I. _ .c.g., .~.._a..,, x Commissioner Griffith moved to recommend denial of CPA 96-0002. di~~,-gv t t-4 f 3S 4 _ 1 - +f Commissioner Padgett seconded the motion. A voice vote was taker" and the ' F , d . t motion passed by a vote of five to two. Commissioners Padgett, Collson, `~~-z r h DeFrang, Scalar, and Griffith voted for the motion. Commissioners Wilson and a`~~``'~ rl afi ut s x Holland voted against the motion. r~`~,~ i - ' 1--d-, ~u & a - "^8 yr "t".f 7 s c 1 4 { so- s l I, T f'W i. #~w iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii f `N a d _ t € 'IL 11 r - '.x ; ~ i i r 4di' a hs i t, - P -Y-1 ~I I k t fit ! u+- t ` d tea" d 2 -4 t- ~.r y' -t -'7'r,''x k T ' ~,?sy q °-.a z PLANNTI G CONITAISS10N MEETNG Nrr UTFS - May 20, 1996 - Page 7 w r k. r ~;,-~$i ;1~,f,~'r,--,~'-,'-,~`~~,'~~ i - ~ .1 I d`ih' K - - ?,mu a°a"'ter,& ,y - , "r tL ~.?~.z€ + 'r~--- - ,p v L 1- - r , } i caE. r- 4rt r, n..-T.-> - "`s e 4 ~:d Z ate, tr, '+a.rM x F[{F i ,AE 2 c 5's y r.X, LC~ Y' ~ 1>°~ ! r r -y - r k e ti x-t- e k 3 3 - F, ,I a ~'!tF M1 I~AS Ji I'- 64 i 1 i ~ rj It I` j 1 ' + 1 4 1 t 3'. I• S `1 I'I Jlv 'I 7 i I •F." +c _ 9 :_I! '1 , t V V _:>=V.::.14.:..~,,...:..~..~....y::. ..ru.r:.._ 3.1,..,E I..~~.,i r r.._c "r.,~,~'T ,.,II.,, * , - - Y- - 11 F- M1, .,'.6 s - ,rik m o~ t'r., .A c"{,, a`' x r _ ~s h. .f.. ` ;r , ~t'F. y , ,el111'a d i i " ed-, f g ti '36"'a b: . !r R: I .4> a , A- 13 .«4r, t '.J, ^'~3Y tl. 'y,. <C.: 't t'%',-spI `5, t 1 1 "t" I t' t n >,1 ,,ry;•r'-,^ -f ; vt r,u,: .;.„,,t,. ~4fpJl i 1 1~. 4,~ ~'I .S `.'ka- 5J1;X`s.. ~f2 Y„i .R))"`.yJ.,. 4 kt If 1 w 1: r it"i' a •.u;'. : r. ; a m Tr" S 'S' .r,,Jf tr- s,~~. tM.xaz, -W J C .`,fa f a ,.{ply.=; j.R ,1 s 9 3 l, d' .r7Y i ' l tj "'.5 t ; p ! f st }fn 7 Rlp~.v "i' 1 .h .1 .v-- , v . t _ _ e_. J _ vw._.1.w.W...r~--s.- ,.i.....-.-.+.,,s t .i~tw.4..,. .ne.. .am..i..7 r ' f - a e.a.J...,t ~._t-~_.~ ,..r... _ -'I f 111 71~'!'~, v 7, " , ; ' a' vT1 I' -TV, -1i I ' ` _ y- .+ruu _ l I - , , , : x H . , i f - - - - - - - - - \1 /p, F » i r _ a 11 \1 _ I -I i 11 Imo- - 1 _ _I ~ , { iI k , ~ ~ / 1 \I I I ` ii1 1 I I I 1 1 i ~ : ~ ~ 1 _ '-I- : I Ll- I ~ - / I ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ - ~ , ~ , I /CC^~~ t - ` IS V~ \ I j/ ,a .--`~J~ j I I iI..'t tt-''-l ;I aD N {r/S C / / y1 Q I I I ; t I \ l J, _l, . 1 \ \ 1 i I - l 7 ri ) l i' t I 5 (6 f~ I_ S { ~r , 1. 1 ,V f , ti IC) r , C \ i I i , I' ' - l i ! cl- z \ I i i` E + I -.r , , - I' 1.Q - i 1 it i, u, s _ //j ~ / f -t,1 I'=r -'l, ~.~1L~._-~ ~ IQ:T7 ~`'..-t y f' I i -i•- I :I 11 HIV{ 'r t I `I S I r_"~ _ `u^ ' 1•i , - t \ 10 - ! II I \ l ,_r-f i_I , I j \ j S % \ I 1 _ I :L r A I i 1- a Q , r \ { i . : ! ~ ~j " i T ~ ~ - I- I : L, : - , ~ ~ a / - - ~ ~ i- ---,,~-i,~ - - - . i IX 1- yi 1 ~l-;- i 1 ti ~1 j.»._.Si r-~ ` - r I ;1 I I I p _i lj- -i , , - ~~i ~ - ~ ~ : . , i - - - - i _ 'L_ , L ' _ _ _ ,rl , - ~ t,' ',:r 1- _J ill T 1. 1, N, r ~ l' L L ~ ' - ~ I ' 4 , , " :r~~,~, C;, ~ - ~ ~ " y t 'r; k ~-,;~l:',,~~, " , 7- - " 7-~-7-- LLJ , ~ , - I ~ , ~ . - ~ f I .,.r te } E- I ~j } p t(# Y. 1,,t 7 1 f it- Y:tv.a,,t'.,, vp^,•.~, i F W (ui F _ 4 '`j, t j .~yw 5 5 4' J i 1 _ ,,,1„ j{., I - 1 It It - I' - i t. L,~, .c+, 5 t e I Y, I , •I .;:1 I "t J, . 1. ; L k d 'I %w, 1 , "6 7 is, _li t4, vW4r' ;91e r, C.C.a, l t 4 I i S E ,d, r, :Yr+,M`.. Y_ ~t>. t ,J-4 r 4' X}, 1-{, 1, k, Y-7, y'. 1 L~*Yp~ 2 1, T'~ } ~ ..:.:G.w,.._._$an._. .._«...~..r-.. ever. ..xx wss ..-,.,a,..`._ ..«,o.... a....... _ - I - _ • Parcels potentially affected J proposal. Note: = Parcels Potentially Affected ® by a - see staff rep«t it r . explanatw by CPA96-0002 as of ° tens Areas Zoned General Corrmerdal k 4ITY OF TIOARD V iQ 2 f - - - 1. 1 J \ - - FAJRHAYEN - - ¢ - I / 1 I~ l ~VIEVMAOUNT-- - GARDE14 PARICPa_ I _ . r aHw_ - - - - - - - - - - - - YA, - - t W ~t I t VIEVMIlOUNT CkAPDE i t i 1 I ~ 9 ~iF- ~ 6,Y / L!, 'E l _ vY i 1 ? - iiCPN7fl36lJRYW- rifer s /z'--- - - 6 iii -I1 r' s / - - - - MURD,0%ST - - I ; 7 7- e F_ 4 { Z -b- ~ v:~d^~~.unrF'+•+' - - -:~35•. V n - r, ..:s w - ut ~1 - - - - 1 •-_.C_ 7 I, 7 ( t ii•rwrw ; - _ t parcels potentially affected oposal. Note: f Parcels Potentially Affected ®bypr j` t by CPA96-0002 ~`~'a General Cornnarctal <r ~Tr oP rtoaa® 3 L~~J py~ \ f i CL, 77 yja i \ 1 C ---1- _ P ST / y i 26/96 Y i r s err pt - ~ 'fr } ~ Y~. = k k ~ E r 3f - , -'Z ?N - - < a z€ °w T 1 n t - - a : Y r s -E'F*Y Y F "s1' xi `'x€. "'L"Y4 i~ - .?v.LSiu.m_.__.. ..........e-v~.u.. S,sc....i.vL.`._;,`4 w»r.. ~.,..+....am.u, u+.uw..w ve+a~u...d._...,...~ f -,V- }y Y `a _ Parcels potentially affected t v - 11_ I s Parcels Potentially Affected by i 4s : ' anan fo te a - ,6~k by CP/A,.~9C/-0002 TIOARD - - t l] rn t _ 1 \ I - / J _LOCUST YT -a'r ter-- z - ----rte < n ? is r a - t \ r._- \ rt s~ - i -y - `a r I a' t r - - - t - 11 `~--Y R - - "y - ate' e ! j / R r e x c \ 11 I a_ •;k n \ ! i \ \ 1 I 1 i - e e. i~..,~v~.v. ~1'11"ItFF71f,`~T-I-iL ~177z*"=- - ','-,-"g~~, - 3 _ 1 I 1 k--- r- Y"xtY_.r~t`aG F'~-~~ \ ; I * Ff. " - --I- ~ -I,- - "I " , \ \ ~ 1,!:t~~ _ \ \ - t- 1 q j i G k,, it- SI LoDY . W 1' rY s - t \ \ I I t 'g - r~k ar- ~ - jr .~~~~~~,T-",-,~",;.,~~.,'~--,,---,, I ~ LR- 2:1;, ~ I ct a n a 1 i i J EiC~.a - ' i € i t s - sk' u~4 } L -1 _ 't r / \ ' ` \ I`-' I-- T_~r~ 45-~ ' 't^~."""', ' ~,,Y~,., iKK r k 4, f 1 ` L~ f i -i 1 - t WN C - a,Y- "s { { t 'tea - - -_x l/ \ i I t _ 1___-i - '~3 ~~'i;t ~ I-- e;'. E~ r. - - - f - r s F J _ p r v - - 'e \ \ T-+ a _ I I- T_- r-' -1 l i i \t-"_ i i a - - t i ~ t i K 7Fi-QpRQTq \~-_._N- F _t_ - ' -Y t~ i c f t _ N _ u r x- E - r- ' \ / r - i " r-T-_,-- _ 1~ r I ~OTA , _ - - sr a: \ i _ ti i `I 1 --f -j - - s - 2b - a E . F'r r i _ -r--y F-, I ~r: r es+- 3e, ~ .r ' , , ,-,,°"ra a - - I \ H`~ _i_ _ I t - you r 4 I - - r f 4,`- R' - r i , r y;',\ \ / C / r I 1-- r ! >i a r p r i 3 'KS,~ - l 4. Y - '.1 1 / _ ! - ~ i i-- rf - F .,~5 C x..., t(( - r "4 4 !Fr p i -i, J ' ?1 `-I '~'.'T^~~-,t ~-8 _ _ 1 ~ .sY ~ t'r , " . \ I Crt;-a,-'ci_3 T i 1).S l 0.J-. r t. w W,TMP fi v a °t e ' :z 4. - -x'„ 7 - _ - - - _ _ - 11 , . 0-" , \ h sr~3 P t M P .r' - - 'w' r'' 4'- Pfi iSC,, v. '2a5 "i;^•e•~o 4 , _ _ I " . " - ! _V~ ~ ' ' ~ , ~ - ' , ~ , ~ , ' ~ " ' - ' "Ju-, , ~ - - b --7 `FPM k"l i r a r r. tee 3 -w"- s i'w - i_ la=' c a -mot t G~ - f m ~~,Z- ,~-f-,--. ',.-~~.r'.~~""f-~,--',-~--,"-;,~--, : - , I --,"1-"',"-:'.I'1`. I I I ,,,--,r r. ~ , - , " ' , - L _ ' ~ F. . I "M , ~ -1 I I ~ m -_~1r _-~I'- ~t-~!'~_y`i`.^' r..~..~-w~'~- .~..±.~.~w...~.^...~..~.~..~~ ~ } r~ ,j I➢a V ' L 9,6 3„ , _ 7p t Zg "e .xk is \ Y_U t7 $ h Yi rte..,;„ a I . S # _ _ _ - _ - 5 a - \ I~ c- rte , s n1> J Z ~ s : ' y, Z - - - } - a - le, sK,.d a° e si' _ t cr .s~,..___, _ •ua.. M-„ saia._L aa.~^ a..~,...n.¢w>:..-d.__~___.~ .TM_ -1 - Parcels potentially affected 11 1 - - lj~ 11 - M, I Zi; : Parcels Potentially Affected ® tfa; by proposal. 1i ~ 'y;? by CPA96-0002 ==f on of rn(eria . i i t* " - Areas Zoned r A~~ Ma 5 ='a'``a' ' ,A-r' TY OF TIOARD - - y s n 57t f 21 11 I ar - _ 1$ - ! it--r--' i- ~I ~ ; - k-``', I I 1. y l _J - - IaI---I--.-- I _ I --i -'..f •nR 6 Es° i i I - Vt(µ~S+ r- _ _ _____LOCUST _T_-T - r, i s 6' I 11 i -1 t'rs'~e # s214 . ! -X I I I I I I i I = ' t r ` -e --!g - I I fj -l--I-T C - ; ti l 4 E'~3 i i I~S Y_aaur~ YL i - Sf >r / Q I r r I_y 1 1 r r- I I ( }r G~ _ G Q - S ;_~__,~_17-2~1-;- ---i-,~-~,~ ~ - 1 ~ r k - 1 -y".i i i _ -lI ~I I I ! ! I I T~ 71-j j I I F y k r .1r', t - ~'Sl~~ I~j ~I._ I i jI I ~1 I _ J i >a*:, t1~ z -I c cs t - l 1 I ST ~ L-- i I / 1 i I I 0%///%A __--I I I I I 11 ~'c^xfta~ sI V-111 /l 1. 1 1 I I !-ti I I' 1 4 Yr _y.~ / / j- _ -WMEST! III I--_ I i I i ` 11 I I r - 5} kt'~ k~ F, 1+'~ 1 t ~I~~'I II ACC"" - , y / 1 1 1 I 1-i 1-!_ LL I t x.,...z' , -ef.~ - 1 ?s t ; NE f ' 1 r x rt~I r-__ i i _ I I I I I I I I---I - Y r.• t` t-1 't h , i'Mx t 9W~ -----L- - f--!- - I_ 1 Ill ° ;"~i ~~i~#' MR, , I -T 5 r t I j SPRUCE ST j=--~ 1 _T, '-x..6 " " ! ~ ~ s ° 4 i - -r-- I _rSRRUCE_ ST - , _M,~. I ' iHOfiNSL----I I L__> -1-IY I~ , 1-1 .cf x W, - _6 - i I I r-r- '`(}--~f ~ I ry~~1__~..- 1, r r _ --1.-I.-._.-..___ i I ..-_Q 1._ I Q_ -yi.,r-3"?Af' 7 3 fTFdr 1 a t, h 5` a A ; S7E~E _ 3v i- y T-_____ i f~-- j--._ I y~-$-I- DIY '"`t'r5sw#,£ as 1 - Y a I _ii j - f - rs i I -j rL II j_ ~ __-~I \ I I _ 1 f -t _ W--___..:_ i - a t F_-_ ..1t- T _ kY(a. ~i - It t ' ----I I C ry it,i '-11-1._ -~.7___~. \ I--- l ---J - £ - - r~~" a ~f - - r I I t-"JI ,,15 ``-Y - ' \ - k z --i . --J 1^- I 1 L i ! i ,7 2,- _ x r✓ x' j t4 - t N I I C I. ~ -1:__ - PFPFF7F_ `1 7--j L_a__) _ ' ,l»~r ~a ~ a - s it £ x t r - i 3 - t i# ^as F S f- I I- 1 r W --___1 ~i\_ ~\11 141, k r# { 7 ~ ~ s M1 ~ , - 4'%~~~, _ ,I~~ 7' - ' 1~ I J. r . I - t Y - r - C ."6,s, .,.}'-4-- t 1- 4~ _ - s r r ,e t a m,t _ - - - _ - _ rc - - . - r 11 -1 -1111, k s 4j ..L _~_i. 1,.. _ti......_.~.z...~_~-+•esFr.~``~~c, l----...,..-.,~. .:-..4..-.,-~..;r~_.....-~'~-+.~:_ ez. _~,.__...,._s-{rl.~..:t _'.rs_ 11 ~ - - _ - ' , , _ .++F ~•~;,-a,rt A- r. aim-~,_.i::.w -!~t4 - ' i s>Y.t u T 5 _ _ _ - - - - _ _ - - - - 4 ~ ~ 7 ~ + _.~....w_...n....~-~'. ..c.~_,. .-~_w - Parcels p°teMially affected ' M aNt Parcels Potentially Affected ® by proposal. te. see stall rep°n fa b t i I { by CPA96-0002 ~a Areas Zo Zried ned " Nbp 6 C~ Cenral C wemal ITY OF TIOABD F ' MA~ 1I I CT_ - _ I I I - - - - I - J -A I ° - - , 1 sr - T- i - - - - PINE v _ - _ - - - - - - r - - , t - --I - - - - - - I SPRUCE 1 J-, L r r 4 5 :R nX I P ~ r I Y J 2 a 1 , I - j E z F7 --ii -i j =s f; BA11OF2 Q I-- "A: 96 26/ r z 3 " it, ; £ J I - - - Ii % . F ` a.L .S4u~..s9~S.,;a.L. "Atuewa..l 1 T+X2.4,8 I; AREAS ZONED a PROFESSIONAL t - MULTI-FANIILY COMMERCIAL EXAMPLE 1 ; ~ 96-0002 AREAS ZONED GENERAL CP SINGLE FAMILY COMMERCIAL HIJI "y to - - ~ ~ ~ ys;~ •''.~.'Y.j+~~,S - EE QAK ST f r . INE ST if, x ~`.i,a `"ai,A¢iy tl ~ '1• h p,~ ,~,yyt.~~` ~ ~~~„?,rY a ' For 616r MCAP Sre.e.. pko'ra In 77-7 r E s ~ + _ r g 1- 7771~1 1 i,. Sf.,i 1.:' ^.u ! •,F.,. .aa }.q .r ~r+ s.:, i' '4~. ;«~a v~:.{ si: a 4 ~ ~ a ~s r: ~ r _ c ,r~ v arl :ci t } ~ -'r 1, k~ f r .,,,t e. 4n. '.tij. { <;il- iA F . AREAS ZONED PROFESSIONAL v #j ► w MULTI-FAMILY' COMMERCIAL EXAMPLE 2: AREAS ZONED GENERAL CPA 96_0002 SINGLE FAMILY COMMERCIAL d {1 - I I I 1 I I: 1IiI►IIIIILI IIII_J, }d _ ~ ~ 3 3 `fit ','3`7":''S~f`F~± mj: FRED 1411 ,;t tq:t +x b: 43 t 717, 1 Fl AU . .fit. fi tt x` 4 r';;,t ~ J,'; is I r S sdArl's'i, $UBry1 Y p' L EE ``1 { 3¢'£•~- 1~R t ! ]f Iii i,~: te' 7 1:',.!'- }tx ` ~i• t`;y ` - ' .qs fi~~= ~i; ` i- f 4 •'l`e.'t p/F S' x ,jy ITIMRb 6NEWS `f - S• t i': ,HCG'7k~;2 uND$R• ni ~3 fit, rti it 1 tx 3 ',x i"•'' 71 tI£L~v P t I' "a •v -.*,n"+aTMn.• 7'^+"=~r,,.+"..+r- 777r- t „1 a, r ~ ^7~ .1 -^'rr nr7^r 3Ji~.•r..,... .~-rv' ~~..r i.;i r s 5i 7 i : ~I _ : .':r ~~'~Fr i. L. i r'~i i 1 y I .3 ,3 < . .tat z n-'x., Y MUTI-FAMIL COGENERAL MMERCIAL EXAMPLE 3 AREAS ZONED CPA 96-0002 SINGLE FAMILY } - ~ I ( I ( I ~ \ ~ I I I I ',;irK.•+I'R'h •w.+>r.,;Ma ' 1 - V .4.r• r, ~ ~ - r t.1• - _ t R ST ~.£l~~'Pj~;'F ;rr Y ;:;.r r'jq~~ 4 =~`F"'• .y. 9l:3ti,., IT ! 3t y - f , - _ a, 7~, •x r~~H'~d'7''99 {''h3 't 'firer i ~ k4{ i D CAL LL pp 1 ~ . - - ~ vJ ' ree6aiAA33yrti y `~+i - ~??i Y;''~,,r s 4 1 L Z w.' licit iy r~ i6 w'! ~y t \ r; ' +Lt"¢ A' P wxy i _"S'1"'-~tL ~F710111M~I Eh Pike ~.f G}~- :'te . 7,7 h:4i . - - ~ $ IIXLMOOONDEO~-. i- i ,3 ~t l g~ t>x'~' n"'r"r"""C ,n., ',r-a,.•.,-v-r+xr~^- r-,t7 -n-.x 55 ~'^TT~-r~~, n-*^-r~n' _ r.. ~ ~ P •1 ~ ,°.l ~ .'-.i'I- I~° - e_ f,,~?:. 1 -i`~' f3 t rl;t e. ..r r „fd l-- :171 rr~- 51 ~1 l~ r3 a~ t ;J ( t a r.' I 7~~ f ' 1 .~1;y r r •.rv .~:°~x~.e» w,r. _,d~aR _ _,~'u„ sp,,,,x: j' s, ,~r., ~-~.`5'~. ~ cz.. 1: ~ :!-s':.. w ;».J.,, . ~ : •'n~. 4 s a ,xn- a I r•~ , s ~x r..~ viq'`~ ~tx,'~' . ~ .t ^ ~.rd f , J!.. -3 ;;,,r ¶'-id'nz.~'3.M,-;` •u Via''r .Yf r-C' '1`rr: er-E. f. - ,J. "S' 'v'a. , a,. -oar „ r.P' , ;t, . Jr Kr•:L ^ Y . . } . l'r3 k~ 4 , : a~'•"t"}t~:,.V ~ Y n f- t aft ,atiG ~3 <fi W +I+. ..7.- ,'Y't• ::k•:'tlnv wl' .k"; v d'."± , 4 `nab I ~~5 ^ "f ``:,;...t ` -+k~.au.' 1 Fr7r a'-z'6, } b t x n x t~ • .4`'fr.:~'} x,.~-" ..rt.<,:a~ .'*~^4 f5- ! s<",. ' x ~Xa & ~ ~ "~a r 1 :M1t, . , .S~J.~> lY.. _ ,,,k r • , r1--a:. , k'; .t ~,mr^t k'1 i~"'., r.:,,, r. '"~.1'„•~.r =n #H 5' i :i m. ri. • . hC rot v v 3. .t,. mi, ~r• 6'" - u c" F « rt r r Y°n Ott, a, u.r.. p . ,,J: N"r ar.. ..~5 r ° Y~ ~ T ^S', nn~'•'~`::",x,4 K 14. f W 1`, _rw..r. R,rr~. '2~' , . ~ , '.,d r~a<~.., _ r-+'..,,•.,, '4 " v'a.a. .~,-a.. .Mry ,~?fin+~ g _C t ;+N+'aCnf ~ 2,+,% -"„r">a,.,~c.,a ~ ,J;.~..-::.., ~.hc .re `f'.''. •Xr, .a. 4 K, ~"1'-"". t: ~;i-':"%µ~ d~ ,tiF e t 4 a?• .3`3 Irv. w'rr f a+ ~ T x'S -Jr" ,a ssd, .m "'mot-~, x`51 F„ J -rT J~. 'S: ,J ~ *af` ,Ts rn ..,s,•, r"}r.. JP . 4r g :'t '2 , --r'' :fir" b'•r .3: ~ , svP`"n r" ,u. :J ' ,rt tC 5, d a .'C.5 a ~ d, '",'F la q =h ,~ir'gn,r fl , G. m rFr a''~ _1 ,.r. ' :M1' J " e~t Sa;,,< i : . r,,•f%nh•. :.*Ya--,~mf x.i' ,e~3•' ~ - 'il, "'<S x. d`+°', +-i mY ,f. .•f1"' -a~d`P..i3,- „1„ ~`'a'+,s ry+' ,`Y1 }.jT i 5 •-,i. 1 :sg` ~'i„s,r a* F WON qq",Amw;, ~f r,- Y, '.5x P ri Y t; t R- `k4 W F ,1 Q , a , AN 04-1- cot aQ;wjQ7:" E w " ; z w a H r ~ ~0P, ° Cn PQ loot (D zo W P4 xGuy too I~ w# ! t S I.}y O H 4 l nu vo U F-7 Y J Q tQJ - - dw A-, f r C ` v 15.1 %&AT low A , k4 p Not clot r,1 J y i s t (FY ,t ~ p £ P ~ ~7j I a 2 39 5 Y`'" '2 "t a a } ~ S , ry ~11 Y M1'{t Fr SI f` 4ry t t L Sk W ~1 J u lY~ r i~; v7{$ c e t Ft r, ',y4a' ~`i3~',J ~tdt r~'F'~ br+ f 'c ,p-?--1,m, 4r s4J 3-d u, t .ti Gf r'+' 6aY V 4xA '9y t K Tr ~I~h A t' ~v^ ryF"",.i 5''i ai `~v eh "M' 1 x - hs`»y l t it 0 My 9' nl~ s^3-a ash Mo ruw s ~'r n f S' v ~r~" e t + e 3' .-a t y •n,..."v ,.fie k,t'.• :,.y,J t l'. .'~t J~t .4.,: tx'• t.: a } Yh n h b - 1, " .rvh .idcri!q::4rc-a t4 it r 3 7M N MU, F. K Y 4 4' ;1s ~ ~ • ~Jt 1. , v r• i ,Y .T t rq~ r '1'^ 3 4.".'w .x _ 7 ' Ir '.'s i A: E` ..,,"t .iY ..1',ax Y-,ti-t M^'.Ym ~'•pi p - n- etch y1ii 'Gt,:tA:., "'u1:hP^.'-," cr'i1r" - ~o-4a4.,. "'i."a" 4as.Y ':,L,•,a C"<']'~„ ERIE'. . ~f. . y:. ~ a.~,: ^~yr• „r{,.. 7'iF:. a".4~:'°' .',~•w<~ ~r-'?a pmt,.. lap Y 1 ~rw- ~*t-r + ar k-i ect' zt •,r, J y'r?•, „a F ' - riY 3 1 yt a'y M .S. 3 r f 1 i4- .1'§'rYr's'=" "i ~:n uti tans • ff.. ra ~ .<k tC'r:'r, . ! M _ r' } :.✓,k.. "7;"+; 1,=i -r".y1.,:'r" x-r'>a .'r]tA. . ^rls' t 'fYe•••, t tF +19._ .,8 "A`z~'. v,~-'fix. o-:~. ~ Ore" rite`' .1- . . U •"1'r." ` -~d y, j ,"li " , I !!"4 a N d 1, , detr RR } t'„`-f#•!. ^F v,~,a-:w, t•A x"P"-~ rv ~.'a { ~,A .'hi'rer T• `S, N?' - ~ fi' # R':t - ^,`;t<, ,rny'-. ; d.e.4 'hb3, '^Y t ~•.=Y;x'i: "i '^~~•„':4 rh' ,Mt°., _.,.r `ri,'s^.' ~v' ,~';'s•.'._, 6 Jr: tv`I~ ..yu • q. . >,4 Est , •r~ . . ,L . •d,V iy~ r.J •,k7. ~ kh ,v}, s:.a'. =ur tl-.xa`"'`'. ~r ~ •G. X^,.. S u r;~ p'x`..=n;Y^;^ x9', z: h?., tip .,L-r` x:3j w;°,,°:t- "^'"t-, T~ d s•f ' ?,g^• a i ''S~', . .5,: i -,v. ~ Jnkw:, •r rh, a p; M -7• aY~, ,!la -'3tG:' c+'~C°',dr ~:a .s .o L" •"~.r'^', a+"4 ,Y. .~':tw vg~ r&:'". Prul .'4 r~ •.r-'„ "E,A~ > .S '•:`ex i e~} P> ,fir -.,F. ~r> -7 :"te•. .A''~ '~"6 :ir`„ -Ue ~ r, ~fi' 'm'~..u xa{~ «ni ` „s, fa~},`r.. °,>•a„ +G;ar '~'.~~a=•,r- ' ~ ~ a , 5.. a, ' s „fit,. r~•- y„~?'..,,.. 1 ~ ~ ice. V.,, " r•., i'?•~'~ 1 d . J F,-: a 7e`'t+' < ~_'+75< t "~S ,.n iY;» - ~~~,:>~~5S--~i1 .cam -it _ ~ t L _ f l -t % L rgx .gf I ON R, WIN ug -o ~4 - t TABLE OF CONTENTS t_ h r t y 'A$r xrj x`i Page a --rte, 1. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION 1 tr-~ ?-r ~ - '1 Y mom- 4 l y M II. PROPOSAL 2~l ,3 it > 4 A. Proposed TCP Text Amendment 2 1 5-2- ~'.•rr.. rx C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 a"~'S a"Ftw~'4'•.a;5;` i 6~ i n t Procedure for Legislative Amendments to the TCDC ................j yy ~y~ III. APPLICABLE CRITERIA 4 A't^},fiS}X"l` t( Q.'-~Z-' . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ A. Statewide Planning Coals . 5 B. Applicable Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies 9 r C. TCDC 18.30.120, "The Standards for the Decision" 10 t s-- Chapter .6 .0, Division 12, The Transportation Planning „ Al~i Rule 11 q IV. CONCLUSION 16 Far ;~t•a.=~ s. r r fix, 4 s LIST OF EXHIBITS 17 a . ~J a S ~r $g, yc 4 a, Oil ^a ~ £ s t ar F- c~ pw, gp'g xt , Y ~ k "y 4 ~f - 1tY .ff' n i sx ~ rt & ~ ~ rnxu-::aaa.t cww ema t _ ~y, 4 +.tir r5W ~ uY'~ k rr "MMN, mg ~?gg sx'~4~i~#'n-< v n t+ a - -,,r - 4 x r-R+ g ,~`f" E ~I 17 3 ~•Yy`F.-i 't` zra # > - y v i 'zas"~ d. 1 } S y~ ~xgpf`~ i rV,, cd' ~w h",5~ A ~r S d 771 g G1-M, ~~~'~~,3y`:n'~ck ' ' - x 4.~,~.. ^ .•:w.aUys<_,;..«__dna.:.,°..~~a:.~>,::s,..vv::,.a,. L,:,..'.,~:.s~a~:r_~sw...,._w.<..,._ __...v.......,_,~w..,......_• ~ _ - av 1- . s 4` x, 1. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION "4t x APPLICANT. AKA Business Services, Inc. Contact: Mr. Walt Aman, Jr. 10626 SW Barbur Boulevard PO Box 19089 ° r J - Portland, OR 97280-0089 1 _ sf Telephone: 452-I094 0, APPLICANTS Michael C. Robinson REPRESENTATIVE: Stoel Rives LLP 900 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2300, T Portland, OR 97204-1268 ' ' - - • ~~~.e~r_,.x,, . Telephone: 294-9194 £ Facsimile: 220-2480 L € s r z x r~tr ° $ t PROPOSAL: To approve a legislative amendment to the ! w>} f~ Tigard Comprehensive Plan ('TCP"), Policy Y, 12.2.1(2)(B)(I)(a), Spacing and Location criteriaq cfi for establishment of the General Commercial r f r'` 'i Plan Map designation. The spacing and location criteria for the f General Commercial Plan Map designation 'fhr'ri y now requires as follows: 1~ x 'The commercial area is not r r t surrounded by residential districtsg g on more than two sides:' This application requests approval of either of two suggested amendments to the spacing and location criteria: 1. A_*rienrl the IOCational Criteria to apply only to commercial areas surrounded on more than two sides . by R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 k , i - 1d"'~R" 4~ 't a r k} zoning districts, or p` 3-- 2. Amend the locational criteria as it i R exists to apply only to new f commercial areas and existing, { U S commercial areas to be extended if 1 t ~ the city council finds that three A Y' xk' criteria are satisfied. x' - a €k€ _ jury,' s -ll1 ' A ! b P-,f - POYIA•::A[dl O9oaa OLOe 1 FT -°^f y ? P s , L" 7-1 -,'-'vcx ~ t - jz' - _l yak t t` h+ t y g- j r a fps ` 1 y _ e _.~q F - - z a " ' RR ,erg. - _ - --4 ' - - t` . . tt £ h -p .v 5 t 1- s 1, R_- r "t' - 2"~a` a•~v~ _-fY-Y' x - .5 - - 9 4 t 3 ~Y Y F s* te''" '~S- 4 F - S 2• -Y. .k•' 11 , R 'R , ;Ili, '3•%=L~i s --uav.:'ua.:....:suuu.::os....du,s'.+.".u.>s...;;.....'...: t -t4 s. 4 II. PROPOSAL ( z' H M. , A. Proposed TCP Text Amendment n Q 14 fi k ~ ~fi, ~ This application requests that the Tigard City Council amend TCP E ;r3c's a , r'~s r` E - ~ r 1 - .n Policy 132.1(2)(B)(1)(a), The Spacing and Location criteria for the establishment of W r` the General Commercial TCP map designation. The application contains two _ _ , t~, , M. - 11 k r alternative amendments. r - ,r^3s 3 ~9 a~ ' 11 1[z7!: n i Alternative Amendment #1 DI- v v ...tea r "(1) Spacing and Location"F= -k ; - (a) ThrA new commercial area is not surrounded M-, W'' g v K f , I Mil 'V,-&V- - residential districts on more than new two sides. h-tom t rar.Y. .,a C.ikY 1 - ~F Lea x'# i "nom (b) An existing commercial area may be increased 1 ~ ~ - ,-=x K and is not subject to (1)(a), above, if the City Council ~ %1 c ~ finds that: M .1 -C . F ; # 7 Y' (i) the increased commercial area 6~> r will not adversely affect the surrounding - - ,a' I t ,R x - residential districts, 'Vtl - Y - , (ii) the size of the increased 'k - - commercial area will allow an appropriate 'A 3 w f buffer to be provided between uses ~if all ilE T " -1 allowed in the commercial area and the P 1, r - x ~.L . . a surrounding residential districts, and - ~ I 11 F3.t xF 3s 11 ~ ,v i # m the increased commercial area is (Grp ~4a p x r¢ the minimum size necessary that is~a i ' required to allow the appropriate r - ' i e`+s~- fi t, art -,k• u "t redevelopment of the existing commercial area:' $ ~J' ~ _ y; F x l I-- - A a Alternative Amendment m2 r ' * r ~ , t "(a) The commercial area is not surround°d by , % ~ t, . ` 4. 1Z=1, 12-Z,'R 3.5 R-4.S'a6d R-7 residential districts on more Y ~ 7 ` a p -~x than two than n d 1 i uY3 I , t y St ?DXIA-=L0&I 99909 N06 2 } k _ - 4 w4. -'Ijo- - #5`'~ k 4 r- w n> o- F w r 7 S rm~^• .w ^ti~ ' LK k', -^a~^ - - y ~ "k9 1 x 3x 'y r m? -y - e _r ur r p s ti i' X 1~ y { - i b S 4 Ai LN f t1 - P- t Y ' - a 2x ,syna~. ,M Ii a%*~2,m a+ y kt x' - ~ y,x+~y 'F4 F'...^. Imo,! s r - 4 r i S ~'a Si3s 1 - -4 ,t " - _ -F , - a 4-~,~. 4'` 4314}+-- { .,i s9; ,h ab,~y-•,' sp ill -z s a - -T hs ~ , ~ ~ ~ , - ~ , ~ - , ~,~'-o ~ r~ - . - , , - I ~ , , i~ -`11 I mss a c... ? _ c I I I i . 11 ; - > - f -.Gb ~i.y Gam., . " -,s +1, - .,A r i r7l 2- ;0 V.T 4 4 °.T M a?- +a=' ~X § S - Y h 3 t TME 4x 'i x e m ? ~X B. Need for the Amendment ,u The application is submitted on behalf of AKA Business Services. AKA Business Services owns 5.81 acres of land with a split General Commercial -7 - and R-12 designation. The site is located on Pacific Highway with a very small 1# ` ` S s - " "S IRIT fir' « frontage on Pacific Highway. The General Commercial portion of the site contains "_'-{Xx N r an older commercial building. Because of the site configuration and the 4>- surrounding residential d,s«icts, the owner believes it will be difficult to redevelop 2 h~ the General Commercial poeXOn of I the district . without t , also rezoning _ the R-12 portion of the property. However, the current spacing and location criteria for the ITT General Commercial district prohibits such a map amendment in this location. 3 s M zt r° t The proposed amendment addresses this situation and allow the City to chose one of two alternatives. Neither alternative would result in a significant exti f - ? -sue ti' - change from existing city policy. Alternative amendment #1 would continue to f~ r 4kt r apply the "no more than two sides" policy to new commercial areas but would - exempt expansion of existing commercial areas if three criteria are satisfied. L Alternative amendment #2 would prohibit expansion only if a commercial area e r a; x k3 would be surrounded on more than two sides by single-family residential districts. f 'y JZ ZJ- ti ~ - gS% q. The amendment, besides directly assisting the redevelopment of an ;r § a - existing general commercial designation along Pacific Highway, will maintain the r, t current city policy while allowing selected existing commercial areas to expand or fi - - - # q new commercial areas to be established adjacent to multiple-family designations. ix 3 qg, ~~r =~tiu. aca % owov moX 3 }CE~ 54#~ x eszs~ xr r a i >x y { t 17 Pff h ~ f T S . 4 ~ t - l ate. ~t 3 L r - x - t r 3s ~~.s W_.._. 21 e`- ~ 1 2 a - v rill, OEM 5~k'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ _maxla:SnL3fi.,d:L"",..." Y.%ci..`.re.•.-uW,.ur:.~.bSi..Xx.s. WS..«-..i....: ~ct:>~.Y<...svw..l:is.x... ..:.~_...._.....>.e.......wag.ww- _ _ _ ~ - i F RKE Mxk & C. Procedure for Legislative Amendments to the TCDC f. { P~ x4 7-~' A legislative amendiilent to the text may in.: a.ed by any person. TCDC 18.30.020(A)(4). A preapplication conference is required. TCDC, } - 18.30.020(B). The applicant's representative met with city staff in a preapplication r} r~ 'T k,= meeting on August 212, 1995. t s The TCDC provides for a limited "window" in which to submit legislative amendments. An application must be submitted no more than 75 days x and no less than 45 days before the first Planning Commission meeting in April. - x TCDC 18.30.030(A). The first Planning Commission Meeting in April 1996 is on n Ar, ~ ' April S. This application was submitted on February 23, 1996, 45 days before the f:s first Planning Commission meeting in April. zw car xr - r ' "7F-~rY A ~s ~S{y'B 4 i .Ta0.1 1 z The submitted application must be complete, including an application jy- fa Fxh~G4 k z~ t 1 - ~ with an application form, the required fee and 18 copies of a narrative addressing the standards contained in TCDC 18.30.120. TCDC 18.30.030(E)(1)-(4). The Director` u is not permitted to accept an incomplete application. TCDC 18.30.030(G). z No meeting with a Citizen Involvement Team or a neighborhood - group is required prior to submittal of this application. c q III. APPLICABLE CFXrERIA ~ t J dgp 3 The applicable criteria for this amendment includes the Statewide Planning Goals ("Goals"), applicable policies in the TCP see TCDC 18.10:010(A)], IU~l s c , ~ i zA' TCDC 18.30.120 and OAR 660-12-055(3) and 660-12-060 (The Transportation r 3 Planning Rule). TCDC 18.30.120(A) and (B).k ' F ••s`. k a. f f E, 1 r , U M` FDXIA.=101.19?09.7 OOOe 4 ~ L t s- ~`"~"i" ."F".~.a~ N COY Y sf ~b .ea*.w t3nr^re-zFtS'.+~'E='w'gy«,s""I, e`?;??'d=.t ati--- _ n ""yam ,a+ E RUIN Q-1" t i % fir. 'aa, x s 3 y' , ray Y'rt - y"' t k ,a^ c- y t- - - = n i -_c 3:•'t' 4 y 141- 4_" II I yt _....v. ~ _ • , _ - 1 r ~ _2_. . _.x.tv_ _.a . ~ _1z. ~ _ cY, ~ .-l..r. 5 .n ~ ~ _v.. .1.... .v('z_:h~ v _ ki- M. rv3-"Yh 4 t 1 4Wyj" j MiM -,V r~~a1,=~d ~ar1K M~Q~ Y X.sA Ve t t ' e S AE ;l~i --~L~ °y~ ~ t ~ ~ -i• 'iii Y,- a { - A. Statewide Planning Goals st P, f( 1. Goal 1, Citizen Involvement - u _ r r s x' Y` 'To develop a citizen involvement program that w~ ensures the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all Ls z phases of the planning process.,, 3 r E~ t r Response: This Goal is satisfied through provisions in the t~ acknowledged TCP and TCDC which provide for citizen participation in this decision. Goal 2, Land Use Planning- 2. v _ To establish a land >>cP nlannino nmrPCC and T, ~_Mnl z policy framework as a basis for all decisions and actions t~ x< , related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual._ c~; Est h3~ sF base for decisions and actions." 33 v s ~ V y g - ry , _ s Response: This Goal is met because the acknowledged TCP and TCDC contain provisions implementing the planning process. The City will # - r coordinate this application with affected governmental agencies (Oregon - gy- - Department of Transportation, Metro, Washington County, Tri-Met, the Tualatin U, - Valley Parks and Recreation District and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District) by providing notice and an opportunity to comment to the agencies. r -"g Ni_6 {L r rv s 3. Goal 3, Agricultural Lands: %M f Lt F e r~ 1 a s, ass 'To preserve and maintain agricultural lands:'' Response: This Goal is not applicable because the proposed do Y 1 amendment will not affect the preservation of agricultural land. r E "zir - 4. Goal 4, Forest Lands: k 'To conserve forest land by maintaining the forest "M j land base and to protect the states forest economy by N acs~IN x f x x 4 making possible economically efficient forest practices r~~ r x_ that assure the continuous growing and harvesting of~ s a eoxv.-::.ice.t scow wa .5 sp. 0 ~f 5x"4'3c 3 341x t r - 'qy-r ~~~~''~t' '+x~av' <a v<x~x~a'~'i, r-'~ s t sk,y3 % ~`F x Mt+ ~'s 24 X A F,~*y cy ru £3 a~ tit , _ ~ >n r ~ ac r ' -'G'.,s~~+SpC r.,C F 3 _ - t~ f _ - ' - - ^o-t.xre sup ~'*.T" , r,,( •,y^- ~ ems- _ ~ - - r< s~^n ~ f y, +~~r - = ~ I , - - ~ - , , - , 4A _.,.._.__..,w,._. ~-M _.......__iw.__, .............x,~e._.,..-....r..,.....,:.;.<..z ,y.~,;.•Z...,.:;:rr.. € w y me 1 I MR Y~ w, ,f e. . yy. s^.iCifm`? - tea,.. .•.sw-vw,a..i.°a: z:,w aa.~,- .e s..~,c - rya ~1 ; - 1 t . 3 x$ i ' forest tree species as the leading use on forest land ' - consistent with sound management of soil, air, water, w _ ' and fish and wildlife resources and to provide for i - , i recreational opportunities and agriculture.' 11t { 3 ti ATE, a ~ , k - ,.4 t - ` 6 - - - r~ Response: This Goal is not applicable because the proposed t n - 5 Y 'Y' c , _ ar w- amendment will not affect the conservation of forest lands or the protection of the s;, q 4 t 9" V 5- ✓ i ` t State's forest economy. G 3 c~ r S. Goal 5, Open Spaces, Scenic and Historic Areas and Natural t i° s? f in- Resources: r i e ,rm ; " - 'To conserve open space and protect natural and f x ' . t ' "s,, i r ,.;v sty' 2 ~ scenic resources." a Mf ~ FT Response: This Goal is not applicable because the proposed n ? L,-, j Iti~^Fx'S...`"`4I--..,:+.`:.~t' i .*fY~"r'-:~....:. amendment will not affect the conservation of open space or the protection of c c"•v r - - <X S. "I ,may - I .mss "a t z..,P '1 natural reSOUCC25.- ~'~''-~+a,r*'~'~-v -nY5 s j {Ff ~ * t k ` t + 6. Coal 6, Air, Water and Land Resources Quality: ~ 1141- < 5 t 'To maintain and improve the quality of the air, I+~~~*-'" era ~r y , k - E , Water and land TeSOllI'CeS Of the State ° _ S ~ - Mti , b -i Or, a s 1- r?_x ~ g4 s - k f - Response: This Goal is not applicable because the proposed ~Yp~ k e ~ `x ...,-x amendment will not affect air, water or land resources quality. 7. Goal 7, Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards: ; - , - s ~ s To protect life and property from natural ! disasters and hazards." s ' t Response: This Goal is not applicable because the proposed f c s{fir, iC rt d II, ~ r - fi amendment will not have an affect on the protection of life and property from _ =e [F - . -sc s g *~f v'- _t - natural disasters. 1 ; ~F, -3°`, a' {3,, - - 8. Goal 8, Recreational Needs: r; e~ w "Satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of 4 7 , ~ ~ i j the state and visitors, where appropriate, to provide for ,,i r} 1 11 ~F.-S"~aS ;-rY Y . 6 { _ -'°FZ~~ 11 "~~s555.5 z~z fit' i'tm ^'d' ' Y'e ~ PD%lA-::AOd.I wow 0306 3 Y K ~S _ ~.mm..s - Y -x t„a S in -~Itr~-,, ~ 1, - ~ - I , , " 1- MIM NO zr C" r.~ ~ Y~; xc r r -~;y T# 7,~ r, gr ,s. F'x 1~'ar' a 1 i - -4s`-1 - ' 3 'rv --~,s'1'" `#f 6i L r` r _ ~b- t -n - ~,n i J.`; ~s 33#._..r_.. 's...'. Y. ,3. a t ht s z J ._..L _ - _ W. _.v ~s _ t Y ~p All" i uaL4 ~ze ~~ka y _ i L r3~a a t ? rm GVys .a ~4c 3_a sau _ s _ g s ~x Z~%V a~ gs; the siting of necessary recreational facilities, including a x destination resorts." F Response: This Goal is not applicable because the proposed r _ a ` amendment will not affect the State's recreational needs. X 9. Goal 9, Economic Development: a 'To provide adequate opportunities throughout f k ~x the state for a variety of economic activities vital to the t f health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon citizens:' r E Response: This Goal is satisfied because the proposed amendments T. will increase opportunities for economic development in Tigard. Alternative amendment #1 will permit expansion of existing General Commercial areas where, 71 "iN needed while protecting residential districts. Alternative amendment #2 will allow commercial areas to be expanded adjacent to multi-family residential areas, where l h , s pppyyy the greatest concentration of residents will be located close to commercial areas. r 10. Goal 10, Housing: s 3 'To provide for housing needs of citizens of the 3 m J state." 5M Y h ' Response: The proposed amendment does not affect this Goal :t r~ because it encourages two of its central purposes: maintaining existing housing" g E ti- areas and the efficient use of buildable land within the urban growth boundary ~~~pr `E ("UGB"). See OAR 550=08-000(1). Goal 11, Public Facilities and Services: F[, „ Mr a$tt * 5-E r ° u k o- - r 'To plan and develop a timely, orderly and # 1 efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to z& serve as a framework for urban and rural development" k~K } t, { f ~ - • -~2'r zt •i 9' N>e r\_. a - e4zv~~~~~ b y J { f ADYIA-~iCdl 0006 _ y * ' i & t ,~-Tq 10 vrf wY _ g x i 77, °Y MM, s x c+r i r 1 I ''ss^ -77 R-'?a _1f 3, w~ a s } { i F~ y~ P~ 4 4 P taA Ir ~ 4'- - - 1 1s Y ~ w y _zN s.. r RM. -1055` ' {~3 s ~ ~ MM ACP* ONE a x (4 x~ Response: This Goal is not applicable because the amendment will 4^ A-. ^w not affect the current levels of police and fire services, sanitary facilities, water facilities, storm drainage facilities, or energy and communications services. f l > 12. Goal 12, Transportation: 0 sr 'To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and 6F V, ii, a a' economic transportation system.' ~y e ' Response: This Coal is satisfied because the proposed amendments j tom„ -~«yti~ g ~ , ' will not cause congestion on nearby streets. The amendment alill not allow expanded commercial areas that are not otherwise served b adequate transportation facilities. See TCP Policy 1.1.1(x) and Implementation Strategies Vt s tr a, ~ ~ 13. Goal 13, Energy Conservation: 01. 71 - a r 'To conserve energy."rtt' r £z``~~- r Response: The proposed amendment will further this Goal because` vwo rv x existing and new commercial areas can be expanded where appropriate, thus Fj r - r encouraging redevelopment of underdeveloped or "remnant" areas. r°~z LL ~3 : s 14. Coal 14, Urbanization: 'To provide for an orderly and efficient transition s N from rural to urban land use." Response: This Goal is inapplicable because the proposed r amendment will not affect urban land use outside of the urban growth boundary. ` ' ^ n t - 15. Goal 15, Willamette River Greenway; Goal 16, Estuarine W Resources, Goal 17 Coastal Shorelands; Goal 18, Beaches and a." MF , Dunes; and Goal 19, Ocean Resources. rF r k M y Response: These Goals are inapplicable because none of the listedf natural resources are affected by the amendment. zd rosu- ace, ov ov coca 8 E I ON,, ~~~4 P 5 ~ t ~.yFY .rrg'. - V,_ r3` t Y jR, `f{s' ,v 'H it & - s ? e + - s _ t f i ea'^ rIx 1 r i 4'"-Y- i .,,*.-r ...-rte"-~ ~~'--~v-n - - - ~_..-•~.C- * _ r10 -i. l - - !M K- -1 W pr 3a r r ` g *3 ~x M -dos ~`sm I &W* --s~ y.ss t,a S-- t f :r ~N.~. SEA Lt i z1 - 2 t y43 t - fx3 S s'4 ~ i ~ 0~~1f- f3 .&Ytii # y - -Y.yl £ { a _ ' CONCLUSION: 'hFn x, s1 § a S The proposed amendment to the TCP conforms to the applicable s i~ Statewide Planning Goals. B. Applicable Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies g - x - - ~ 3 ~<lY•ly.,+~1Fi~ - _ - _ - - i I<-e r«~ Y n.M a.. 4 r t4 TCDC 18.10.010(A) requires that any procedure initiated pursuant to - - the TCDC "shall be consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of x Tigard as implemented by this title. TCDC 18.30.120(A)(4) makes legislative amendments such as this subject to "the applicable comprehensive plan policies s k rt ~ qk ~j and map. Finally, amendments to an acknowledged comprehensive plan, 'r s -Mt y, yv= ;'R=;e such as the TCP, „ requires a showing of compliance with the acknowledged (4 n N comprehensive plan. ORS 197.175(2)(d). This section explains why the proposed E - f .2 I 1' 4 5 amendments are consistent with the applicable TCP goals and policies._ > k E 1. TCP Policy 1.1.1(a), "General Policies": yxssr " 'This comprehensive plan and all future Yl~ legislative changes are consistent with the statewide - r planning goals adopted by the land conservation and development commission, the regional plan adopted by i the Metropolitan Service District' Response: The applicant hereby incorporates the narrative in Parts t rw x ,-f ~7 f III(A) and (C) of this application in response to this policy. a~ y g J 1 Z. TCP Policy 1.1.1(c), "General Policies": a t # 'The Tigard Comprehensive Plan and Community' l Development Code are kept current with the needs of - l ~x the community Response: Older commercial areas or underdeveloped commercial ~ gg, zhl F areas will be encouraged to be redeveloped through adoption of either of these amendments. The current need of the community is to strengthen its economic .4 "a2 { 1 rnx n.z es l sew oooa 9 4 k z r t z ~ $ 1 N't -`777777777" x F i~ yuF TniA,Fta', C. ac~a Wk rc- s c r7 dry t sire r r L _ JS "`a f Fp 06" 4 k U t r+ .1 ~ _v~~ ~ "_i.__."cr .~.."~..a ~-t~~~ ~i.~~.~.r _J-._ ~_3~.- _ rr"w ~v _ ~.c .__-.r_..s-a _"I . ~ :tip } rt? - x ~g,- I - - - - - -:,,-_~.-,---,Z : ~ ~ - ME, - IF ; ~ nn,-L.,,,,,,,,,,_ - F, , ~ , , - - . , ~ , ' ~.~x~, ~c y » z e Z r"~ ~"'k ,R,g.+~Y`, 3 ' '.+.,w`s ...u.esus......_..._......--.a,F:ay~ ,e.,-. _<_.~.w._..~...~.~«..+., _ 3.r k i1, _?µi ~C- 'ti r'C.-: i,~= g i, v. ,1.. Ar:-M s..`?.. 11 «f r ti base and maintain existing commercial areas. Suburban communities may t ` experience a decline in older commercial areas because of their inability to be r g; f g" I 1, ?£~-W - is. ~ x q satisfactorily redeveloped. Furthermore, as land is "passed over," the city loses the -xy„~..s ~ benefits associated with appropriate development (i.e. maximization of utility usage , x 0,:;,1'3 ,e j .F,,-? ,:,i,. ;f 'r;~ck_;n-;k,f :f, ~ _ and property tax revenues). Either of these alternative amendments encourage f-' _ - "O ? Y appropriate redevelopment of existing General Commercial Plan Map designations ti e. , r, i 3 R r ",I ~ or development of new general commercial areas not previously allowed. e l ' 3. TCP Policy 2.1.1, "Citizen Involvement": ~ z z -11 " 'The City ' shall maintain an ongoing citizen. ' A ~ ' 4 n .WZ 11 ~Y- involvement program and shall assure that citizens will ^ ° - r , - be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases „ ,-g "x' v 4 ` of the planning process. ,Y, =x;, ~ : ' ' - `y t<`° ;4' - Response: Notice of the public hearings before the Planning i . r - ::s u WA - - ~,,j,,,! fr- F" r Commission and City Council will be provided as required by the TCDC. a - s , 45 ~ The proposed amendments meet the applicable TCP goals and y ° r , > - ~ ' ' s e's-r a `sw T a v a t a' t , policies. Ca} ~s L! :I g t yL 3'-.'r xg~ Wis. 4 1 g ` ~ C. TCDC 18.30.120, "The Standards for the Decision" I " Y t An application for a legislative amendment to the TCP is required to F t- ffiL 3 _ ` k F _ x} demonstrate compliance with the standards in TCDC 18.30.120. TCDCf A r 7 r 7 7 n f _M 18.30.030(E)(4). These standards are shown below with responses following. y I , 11 'fit-'~.~ri - ~-f 1. TCDC 18.30.120(A)(1): x 's+ t.., f-d 1, f ft{ Ii, - 'The recommendation by the Commission and the ,w F l x z r ~ decision by the Council shall e based on consideration f } " ~ of the folloing factors: the Statewide Planning - rF - : c 1 Goals and Guidelines adapted under Oregon Revised } r x jt , f ' ' r Statutes Chapter 147;" py * W ~ vhrv-- , - - 7 r E.r - 3E -i -ed - k k r ~k r - 'tr`+- s" 3`yh i P i RS ~ r 3s eoztn. G 4w o 10 ~ ~ #f { ka# 371 yP - - e . [t ; ° a ! I ? Sri NZ %51 r=S.-4' F ''-i~''-~i` z x t Y - y { F , . Y ! -s~`, 5}Fi` ff3° tX ✓-,1sr . ~z-~s~, -vs .=a°r~•.^.°^.°^^..w,,...amw.rAT 7,~ -v`, rs E§ y~ T f w Z s x4 f xs » r { s'-~~s, , ~ F. ~ p., I s $ f 2 h 7 4 Jo, a jf'~ r{ y I ti- r` ~w !fig ~)9F`~ a s„ d X' 1 s ° , .i7~ - w { ~,s's, N.r i - y + i, 2- x,,.r3~..,.",4Y,;r~"s,h,.~1- r ''i .x " z s a.-7~ v u° _ r r q j .*r s . r 7~~~t , i~ i5 r x rT u F v - 4 y e - , - t e k - 3~i' S.w., l i. - - -+.T---~'-A-- '.°~'~~sR ,x'A.~+.- -r^a^--Zr-r ^*'^.^n`r - ~r fi - - - - - fflg" A ~Z, rfi9 A 11 r < ~ y " }"p d G k 4 i - xt r~?e~%-fib-+ 1 i - Et NO g~ w5 tnt - - , 2} ' aan-+riarsd' - t , ''tt rte-%~_ x i ~I,I x r~ l ;z ~ `z . k~ ( ryA r - ~ - s ? G s, ~ , „ Response: The application satisfies the applicable Statewide Planning E 4„ Y. ' r 1 4` ,"a I a s ;.``fir 4 . ' ` Goals. See Part (II(A), above. a'WC 2. TCDC 18.30.120(A)(2): ? y- t! 1* .I-z nfis. r. -~r^- Jam--=c-,: - x L r Any federal or state statutes or guidelines found 1 3 a . ,~t l applicable; ' ' "t a,rE - t ' ~ ~ ! .r `a N~i , t' Response: The applicant has determined that there are no additional i ~ ~ 1, ~R, ,fir r ry lu, -ilx.F{ t s applicable federal or state statutes or guidelines. ' t { s r ' t~' QQ s -----,a y 3. TCDC 18.30.120(A)(3): [V ~ * ti Y I, ~ 'Applicable plans and guidelines adopted by the T ~ - Metropolitan Service District; M ` 17- ~ t x z a erg;T-5Xo + - t . Response: The applicant has determined that there are no applicable - e , plans and guidelines adopted by the Metropolitan Service District ("Metro"). ~ - ' '7~"l ~ ~~k A I t 4. TCDC 18.30.120(A)(4): t 7 , ¢ ~ r i- = ° r ~1 9ujP'"s?1o- - - 5 The applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and t-, , , ` - ~ y , Maps; ~ , - t# n - , T Response: The applicant has addressed the applicable TCP Goals and . s ~ 5~ li - kPolicies. See Part III(B), above. - n 1 ,w 5. TCDC 18.30.120(A)(5): ~ I , , E 'The applicable provisions of the implementing r ~xF E F> y g~ r era ordinances:''r x 4 r 3 - Response: The implementing ordinances are contained in the TCDC. `1 I sue" , k ~2-'?~ - , The only applicable TCDC provisions are found in TCDC Chapter 18.30. TCDC ~yr Chapter 18.30 is addressed in Part II(C), above. 4~ °'r F F ~ #'a`~ , r, 6. TCDC 18.30.1200(1): ~ . , r € 6, hr ,iii ,s~ 9 .r Vl - . - ~`r*" `x, r _ "Consideration may also be given to r - 11 Ttr R',z"u.!}xf- N h trt' 11 Rh`~Y. ~~f a n _ xs,A& & PDX1A-::AG.1 ~aoo OM ,1.0 °'L.° - - - 17'"S'1 ^m ~qx'i4p,--c'Y 47x"3~^°'° _ <`'x„ti ^*`'a',." L rt"---,-3zry d-~° w ro~'I ,i%t:. S '~ik - 12 t r r_ r zt ~z y;,5-f ~P ; e'" ~.Y'G kart zr y,,~' J kY"Ti ~ ~ - Z G f - i . - , , " 1j ' a'7~x&'¢,•,, ~ rs~ J p ry - t r -i r 5 3 k Nb 5 't ' + ''dd ~ , - c^ - w. Y+ + T j• X - _ ty3' ~ -~•s", LS°-£"'i s- I 1 -x, _ _ r 'r .rte's-,%Y^£C z t ' '1} t F-r .5 a, L _ t t 1,,.+ r 74 ~r.e~ , q fYe t3 3 +4 ~ j- - y 1 3 ° , iL - E 5 t y41.+g`kp~„y~r-F W y... g r • S ) _ a- 4i r'~" c~ air.. " - S x s l ,tv , f i 1 ) k" L uE-Yy- i r r - t i ,a v w~ f' } ij - - _ Fes, j"~' F[ ~ E . - w,. ~aR 8 - OJT_ --2 ' ~ "e'St"z ~a,-•K ~f- "^rr ~ (rG .c . - u _ ! - - - r t',3'm ks i 1 I - s *F- I-Er s r'$. ' - - - 1 4 2 ~4 a-vll y"i E ' er r»~- - ; j _ r t e f y 1-1 S1* !c - c. -'"t-r- s t _ - M1' - -T M1 ''c ` -i - 5 R r r'- o f (1) Proof of a change in the neighborhood or ~ ' community or a mistake or inconsistency in the~- - "M M- ,,-"z £ " comprehensive plan or implementing ordinance which is r - , r the subject of the application" 1 n i~ s ' Response: The TCP contains a mistake by requiring that all General t k 4,' uS. i y' 7•`.r. a , a - Commercial Area Plan map designations be surrounded on no more than two sides ti'`' . $_F by a residential district. The Planning Commission and City Council have two 455 j x x alternative amendments to chose from to correct this mistake. - - rMi Alternative amendment #i would continue the current policy for V ENO I } . ` y 1 establishment of new commercial areas. Existing commercial areas could be ~ #M~~ - Gam... u : 71 G _ , ' _ increased if the Planning Commission and City Council ultimately find that three `?6 u- $~x-, a 4 IS,. X y .wJ. L.,1....~aS k criteria are met. ~ --r Tf i a 4 s r First, the Planning Commission and City Council would have to find € - `r G F c h , , F ; Q that the increased commercial area would not adversely affect the surrounding ¢ z -1,~ ~ ~ IL g a? ~~`QQ#~~ - s residential district. The language is purposely broad to allow the Plannin ~ Commission and City Council latitude in making this finding. ~~~ti a r ~ T. ~ s . " Secondly, the Planning Commission and City Council would have to ~`1sS 'a i 10 ,t s 0 I - X, ev 1 - -IT 1" find that the expanded, existing commercial area was of a size that would allow an O~ ~ f appropriate buffer to be provided between the commercial area and the I, r r * - , surrounding residential districts. This will ensure mitigation of any adverse affects ¢ a _ ~ tk - °xtra f - 11-1.111 - - J that might be created by the commercial area on the surrounding residential r t I vS --rs~.M1 districts. z ?..k 2.~; -r a Finally, the Planning Commission and the City Council must find - ; .11 ` eft V. . -0£asr r spa sN s ~ ° 5 ' i, that expansion of the existing commercial area is the minimum size necessary to T r~ - I .11 - 3 ' K allow appropriate development of the existing commercial area. The Planning i ~ ` { + ~ ' ,ro t ~ k k, ~k~ -4s X Y~,g ~iY_ ` - POT1.1•.:AOd199G990006 12 P P- Y gt^}t Sa r i 141,F,47, 4 x t- , , - - 3. i J r-, ff3` m§E -y z ax^ •r ; :.r 'acv r•:,, ate, txss. r.- 1--,-,,-,,, *r: r ~Gr " f } # s sr ar d, ,gyp. F''3 - * t i ^sx f~ - 6.,z 2 -y n, f - ' - _ 4 .y,. ° rFr "1 J`~ ~ q s4^'~ s P y FLL.. 6e _ Z 1- 1 auks" rte` r 0. i Y ?s~~r'`'~ zr 1 t i- 1 t 2w~`~-z 't4 tfp G f } i} ft+i r r : i~a },t ' t f - - F9 - - - ~'I N x .~,,d k 7_ s ~,65a ¢ € t'om' S`d~a--r ~'h _ L'r r _°1'+ _7,' Y. fi ~~;7y a a/ I -:111 I,- Ex v x h r _ ri _]r ~u'a e z ,N R, - 'I iv 'l 4tY;,},a- Yr 5.. L S, 1'1 3 ft - A- - k XY C}J'f 4 - - - _ - 'xt 6 r T ~ r. - - - - - - - - - - 't x~ L R E ~ x4 '3 MN1''" T F - ia' 6i~ - IX , e'er . YJ4 .s ....-s' vc r,:wy - - ...Qa.,,.,~...<sa.,«r s.~... :w.: s.,.. .u._...._._. - - 11 ~at = i t- z w i ,AMY" £ ,It ~LLL f-, ° r$ ,..w.,A T, R- -s Y ' , ' ^ Commission and City Council would be able to control the size of the expansion - A yh --dsf= J 4 1< if a while taking into account the need to redevelop existing commercial properties in r - 3 Y! F y k y 2 S' C `f t i ri '.&s Z nsla t - T f 7 certain II nces. f I } 'x '1 -,"All-W11 11-11 - The Planning Commission and City Council would also maintain _ ',.4 i r r ah other approval criteria, including the following: i r z E, = K - e No creation of traffic congestion or safety problem. xfiFrY e Direct access from a major sector or arterial street. h a Public transportation availability. r -x ~V s = ~ r '-~ti I " o Site size which can accommodate present and projected r - ~rr~ 11 ' z~ - v --,`.r ` - uses. el, 16 ] o A compatible scale with the surrounding uses. - - Y F , z • Maintenance of privacy of adjacent non-commercial ca 11 #t ' _-t l j mot,} uses. .l - s ? R t~ s",{ 4~4 t= o Incorporation of unique site features. , ~ 1 { 11 r -1 1, r, e Associated life, noise and activities shall not interfere y~ b X-Ma Ors' t k, a£d~' ~r with adjoining non-residential uses. Z 1-1- I - w r r I r -'4t' Alternative amendment #2 would continue the existing spacing and ~ ;t ~f a 50W- 1 ' location criteria but apply only to the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 districts. These~ - ~ y r, districts are denominated as single family residential distric~s. The amendment u~, r-3 ~ would allow General Commercial areas to be surrounded on more than two sides t . E W " t by the R-12, R-25 and R-40 districts. These residential districts are denominated as 1 31 "t w' nx ty r --FS. z' t r multiple-family residential districts. r j" _ -r-v A a 5 w-2a` t,t - 9 It ~~n ~ X , The amendment recognizes that commercial areas ought to be closest t - -q f ,,r r to the greatest number of residents. This furthers the goal of the Transportation ~i.,~ y„'St`1r l r}(- 'OXIA-_ace.t 30oa9 M 13 - - ` ~ v !r," t . atC f x t r r •..Sj q - h,T F _ < 3 t a '3 - Z'i3v i - &J-taFSl--tY' f en ; - 4 t a - T x , r , t , 5"-b?n Fes" 171,K-,..1-ig-c - ) lz z- s x,~r- -vi ' E L 0 at'' J.x s S-," < - s y, } kfiF r'y:3 "x" ' 6 ' , <qJ e„ t - tp. z, f - t. J - - t t : z 'n} c". "E J k k 3,. ..J s .C f r k ~wge s'" y~ J- i jP S 4 3 f i d`V S4a~j sr i s .r E .r 'i tgA ti - a r - a s - 1 - 'T - - _ - - x.: - - , _ - . - - A F a 11.- y - n c ~ 1 W- s- _ , ~ - - - - ia~y,.J~"t ®.,,..._mvw.;s..~x. ssssiauz v. - -:-._.s._..,o.. 5 7 r`# %N~ M 1 "a-.....k 4 y's, - - , .z $~v T - mot, - r;, 't 2 _ K- p 4 ' .--f '°S - ~ 46~, Planning Rule by encouraging walking and bicycling rather than auto trips. The j t r ; ' S 7& 9 x~~- '1~ 5 amendment also recognizes that multiple-family developments are often able to be Ts, 3 more effectively shielded from adverse effects than are single family homes. This f f, s -KZ",~+ VR.l s is due to their design, the distance which they are often located from adjacent t , 'a' ~ "x properties and the ability to incorporate buffer treatment such as landscaping and F _ r r ja r fencing. Single-family homes, on the other hand, are often unable to be effectively , - buffered by commercial development""- tai , 1 t , £zr b The proposed amendment satisfies TCDC I8.30.120, fl$' may, x z, x - I k D. OAR Chapter 660, Division 12, The Transportation Planning Rule ~ { Stu I- X J v 1. OAR 660 12 060 -h : ~ ` This state administrative rule applies to amendments to ~ - y ` - :h. h ' ...c"fix k'F•...`L 6 X 5{ comprehensive plans, functional plans and land use regulations. OAR 1 -r 1 - ~ , a t W r pit t zx d i . Wa " I "t 7 S~ € i-, 't r t ~ 660-12-060(1). The rule is applicable to this application because it requests an ~,-A t ' y- amendment to the City's land use regulations. `~b C, 1 Ss ~ OAR 660-12-060(1) and (2) provide as follows: f h ` ' "(1) Amendments to comprehensive plans, y-, - 3 ' I. I - functional plans and land use regulations which ; ;7 r ; t ? 1 significantly affect a transportation facility shall assure - i s7 r F t that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified < s ~ 3 t N ~ function, capacity and level of service of the facility. n AT, 4 h This shall be accomplished by either r , ~0 sit t €.r x r1°~ i t e~I-; , - _ _ (a) limiting allowed land uses to be z ~j~- , ' ` ` consistent with the plan functions, capacity and 'S~ ' ' _ l.= 3 ; - - - e = level of service of the transportation facility; [ ! iJ - ~ A t r-' , a - I a- ' (b) amending the TSP ['T'ransportation i ry e , System Plan) to provide transportation facilities x ; F = F w adequate to support the proposed land uses r A~ s # j- - ~ , , , _ - consistent with the requirements of this division; r;° ~ r , ' p 36 T I two '"'r^dFY +~7«, - riJJ~ POX1n.::aca7 oww M 1'1 c' ; 11 I i#-icy k.{t„i' ,k'` "A 'r ~ x &0 p - e ,t `ua:• ty ae. ar.,.r 07- -,...~,~.,.....~.n€sa% s. ~..-va a r ,~,t ..,s" S r r ,k, t 4 d av 5 i `zy- - - - 1: - f .z - ~ -,i' +a'E Spy r k Au - 1 21 "I e s .ZL -'`fif !''E- rr' ,lam c 4 ~ ~ f - t -r, i~ Y G r -1 t *g a-ty~.. lx~~ _ ra i r y s f "''YYYY .y d Y i s G ~~t - ~ r- - ; tF, t ~e'~a. Fj ark x ' T r - r e' r -„_+3^"^'p.1??^ass ' _ • ..ax _ `m:~^.rv'm- -•s a- -rx_-r------~ r i A, s a AM h6 OWN -1 MEER NO Y~ fi - - f P D f 41 v, - a 3 rt-~ f, 3 c a `ter (c) altering land use designations, densities, } k 5y7 or design requirements to reduce demand for , - ryes f~ automobile travel and meet travel needs through , other modes. 7 .7,,7 7 -k "(2) A land use regulation amendment a r ~v~ significantly affects the transportation facility if it F iyt+:. X' a'3'a~c (a) changes the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; `f (b) changes a standard implementing a sx r functional classification system; p {f map. (c) allows types or levels of land uses ~ t~- w which would result in levels of travel or access tom-` y which are inconsistent with the functional classification of a transportation facility; or"`= - T`Ti^~C'T'A J { X1'7 s (d) would reduce the level of service of the~ P Y facility below the minimum acceptable level 5~ identified in TSP." Response: The proposed amendment will not significantly affect a x O transportation facility because it will not generate additional traffic absent ° s Y r compliance with other TCP policies. See TCP Policy 8.1.1, 8.1.2 and 12.2.1(2)(B)(2). ¢,rgbi?T; 'M: Rl- : C Therefore, OAR 660-12-060 is inapplicable to these amendments. a~ -aLM / i 2. OAR 660-12-055(3) RA Y' C 1 r 3 ~s~ ~ r This section of the Transportation Planning Rule requires the City to k~k have amended its land use and subdivision ordinances to implement OAR", } W- iv, 660-12-045(3)f (4 (a - e and 5 d b 8, 1994. The City has not met this u # -3AG ' $ is ) ( ) ( ) / i '~1aV -~Y''yNy' f 4 deadline except for OA t 660-12-045(3). ORS 197.646(3) and OAR 660-12-055(3) ~w 7 provide that the sections above are directly applicable to land use decisions when r -Pik r' x { the May 8, 1994 deadline has not been met. OAR 660-12-045(4)(a)-(e) and (5)(d) Y ~ ~r [Y,br are, therefore, directly applicable to this application. a x~a k~ ' 1 ur Ji; -g ig I ,s{2f.', Jf >z t x fix` -4h 1~ , F cY , irt r t a y- b~ b Y Y c t 14 "A W r s s t--,r c r - -f t -25 "21, a "~v`yk t, A# r { a t 357 ta_ 70 1~2 "A LEM 'MW g~,w Vbo t"1?~ae MOD all .;•a'~eji.~',f'~•-'`n, < E~%~, ~ - '~k~zrv~4:yi: y'tie.-.`+.,~s:fga':. a. OAR 660-12-045(4)(a)-(e). k This- section of the Rule applies to transit-supportive measures for r- li.°':r retail, vtttc2 anu iitStlt itvilat ucvctvrtttcttw. This aliteitdiTient sil pports this ' section because it encourages commercial redevelopment. gg ,q N-4 b. OAR 660-12-045(d). ' This section requires local governments to adopt land use regulation M V , measures encouraging reduced reliance on the automobile for all major industrial, F r' ~E ~Sr'n r a ~ ' -t -institutional, retail and office developments. This amendment furthers this purpose xr. by encouraging commercial redevelopment near multiple-family developments.c s IV. CONCLUSION 4w ;t This application satisfies the applicable criteria for an amendment to ta~~ _ the TCP. -fit Yp Zr zNtEl3 7 c 1i~' p F - ;z• r rs - rk z` t 54 a"`t-r f t _ 21 - y,~`;~'~* ' ~ ~ t ~ ,y,>r~' fK., ~ ~ +U~ fir, td'ot~ F b- - tll\ 41 3_'y> 'w 4I 47 s PDX1A-'..'.{;d1 ~w90000 16 S9` ^t e l- iy, 777~~ 777777777,77 f'Y' 43 i3 A _4s;z$c -r`" ~"`rr+ "y s y - ,,....s ?.`.'i~~'-, yW..~' Y g r - _ it •t ' qY.. t 'n"` $ts S ~~~~•~,~«~_31s Lg 3{ - W + ~ ~ J ~ rk .k h ~ 5i hk$.r~-~y xl t + j r bs: tgr^+,~„,, 1 ra ,',[y- u~~s ~s - s' rh _ t i T-~` >k f"''r`ty#,a?~' 1~i '-xa.aA'°a.5~.a-it3.,~ r' .s,~.~..t~ or. ..c-.~,_ _ rrr a'•«,~,"' 'aC--'s 3~ ~ ~rnm-r.~° - - ' <c-~.•r ~---T-ram-., s ! 'east 5P e i ~ a ! ~ d n+ 1 ~ 95~ 5 !ii F•,. ~ ~ r r y >rZ,*~ ~ k~>w',.I - ,.,f.. E '.rte 1 ~..i ~ t>* ,:._...~~v ~{iti ..r..7~: ; ~ s , a,l , .^,z,'rH }c,'ilrvJ' •B. ~ e S.M~y.,, S tiG `•7Y,' x' «r3.` .a"•_y. ~ ir, ,3F -b.-. s.., rc t F cal" a^If.:.Jr~.ry.' 1 d hb-' V .-S ` } tC a't,,{a::,u . '•l ' I. r, •Fa t„^'3, 1,+:: ^,St 'a~s vrf.- . : ~':a , r,- ,.r •'vv Nt. , S, ft .P'~ s; .h, ~q.•„.. ~i :r.x ~p,t. ~ ,al rr.'~,a ,t.r«st~ ,,K a f^ t $ ~;-FT, a•'s s. ;hu' d w 'Fa "I„4 . O~ ,n 1~, a.~T- 4 c~ a'„'t• A" ! t ' `.a,- r.~a. , ~kt,, .k. ,3,r< rww'=: ~ .S: > 3F.'#e - •'F~•5, # t ^J k, a 4; a *t , k's^ s,fa~'t 9aa~~ '-«r:. , r4 - gg~' n ' s-, r h ui ~.J •,t•c,nFl.,•,,, . ,yEr ~rn,FF• 'd.`"a^ a.. G .~.t:° li` ",M! > i~. k',s•: tF ~ . k ~ r~t{", a' . , ~zrlm '>a«, - fv , ~s 4•r_ .b<<C, ,:{tt :✓n;7%-r r•','-).-E., .«3`!+~, rit.n N~rtF,. rat "1~', .h ,.:,^t,f-f..u.,-a. .eS 'L'.~~"a,a "~„rv ''i""^., ~kta"7 } 3, ~r.s ~'~r1 f -.'^`•3 3, T c+ a 4, ° ~';*r "a•" ~ ~ • 54 -a+sa~ 5... .<s a~`, ,'s +«^,1` °9 a r s„ • , -trc h F ' ; ,7 cry'': ° ;Q,•r~ ^«;a . .,,N x~ '(~!a.^' x,",, ~ , ..'i.4.a _ a 'w,-'s r +,a` "oa 5~ - i„x,s. :,:Sv ~ -y 5 r ,=.r. z: ^ `ks~E <",a L:2F"t .rru „ ~ - ,k~s ,'~5 a.t~~ry 4- ` •k"D. >4 r1 .i54'•}..+.r ~r ,~.j. ~ , .ii'-°# -Fr>"' ~,•'r , :~cn •"~,J:; »A`s4 t ,w? .w,^-'>-. sT• k ,n , €'`~_,v [ :.1 ~,n ,.{v Zr Y•.rr ..;-~l:z:^ fv,y-, q.l,°~. :,'i +E ,wt"., Y*v^' k:' .,S...e ~°,r ra -C'd ni'fh~s F~ r.,a t:, .,t,c 'f,• -Y~, ,4'., „a" ^x'a, ,o- '.`^P5,'` ,,3c'z;^ fie.-, •.~--;rb .8 rr,. ~.t+n7r a,, '9 Sr1, _`I':.' ,S'4 , - ,iE•. w'4 {'rcs~ 'v4". M - a 1, 1. s: {,,,.v, t'i ~'4_ s.-i;*u: ,a . ,'9r- r,~«^'`v> :e ~+f: +a. t • $ . ~ ..5r ~t s k J •'--r=~'..:__. .»;n. "r. .-e.:.c.w~^:, gn,r "'`Y~ - i 4 F;,; ""4. Zw - '.L§r'`~,1• .i • ! e .r`•t •'~S: :.r~, . r `its.. a{ rs , r ' ~>d' P f - : V'im' ' ~'•rv ~ F-' `{.•^'ng i ,+F T` tiNb ~G~"x s 'a N-: 1 T _ t"r~< = t^ u:~4, b"i ~ `:f't ii,.~!, '«7'. . .a.- 9 r,'„St 1K x, re A t,-.,,,ye.-.,.I,:. r Y...,*. ~ a^ , >::iY:--::+.'e.. rrrt P•..,, ,.,yt" .4,~" ih d• •ii. f,. ^ ..;fnss:!": .:i ..q; ,`Y~'.ry M ' t^ 8 'T' h x 5. t. J^ ~ :a '+a1~2 .3 «~„r ._~.w - - -.'r. ~`-~`:h". ,,7.., >2 N='6„s;'rh^i•. , .r. r x«- ~ a r , _ , n 1 wa'F~. c+,.} :s. . n. r'7 i '1^ „ r]IN rs a. l.., - .n m,. vtilr tv ~~..x Y>:~'y, 3 "1 d _t ,R Y .P. t4, b r. 1n' ,rn,,:ay1..-: rA.r c`:ji"Y.z"`~^+~, r `l - e Y•.., ' 4 f: 5 y, t ,C drV ~'si%" J, Y i «r. eua 'ua_~.t'w,Sn-?...«L«.::,L~-~.,.u-wuaw•.,+,u - '-ir' °'i C'.l',• a i. tu~,~'fJ:'....-'Y~ ,a, I i 1 1 t T ~ S 4-1 P h ~ 5z ti 'S :'1 t r ' )ly it, {5 V ~ dl ~,I ' rer P # ~ -0~ y t 3 ~ SIF i i W C. LL 1 j 17 _µl S (t µl r i r L~ V ~ T j t) k~ ,{4 y } s r.l v 'D Q f r i V U ~ t' t I J~ r j x l i F' I-' V r td t k I o + a ' J r a -0 irar rl < y w i t y _ { p w i hl'"i ~J # t t"' 'sa G'J W W a - t bs J~ t' re ~f F~,r ysr,-ax,~r' ~G r'rE ky ~S' ~ a - it--_f "x4,c wr: t t r t x L 4r c r 1 t s tk jx~ ;Y _ : ,r~•° r':`" S r'P x, 1 a~yry N~'- as c r - ^S r rf 3$4( { 9 * aft rr ~!t.~r#Xt~~ us ~rc '~°§4.1''a ~ r - ; c';. + ° :,°•+r r L 1+'ry~", a k >fA ti y tt'`F" ~4'a4 ~t~`J - a -Mm R a ~ r c r x y - y eS''°GU~ ~ ! k 4 r - "`'°JU,£''•§"a;',mz 3 m,y, N+ s 5s rsF s-.nMt''''irx;,'' 6' ?P, J' ad.e; "r °men ~mxu r2 s, P S. 9 J•yw^ 1 y,,~ tr J » ~ k 3.. F' ,~Yy%.Z-, M1' ,•k<L:.e' X14=.., .w yy ite 3 _ 'r}, {'}y' ma7 v y ~ >t t, N::{3 F v r1. :mp,e,.«,t W' t,':..%.,•w , •k}` M f?a~hk.'f' .)"4 R`i S.:vF n,~ .i=w. A «4c- $ i ...Y,'+•3r t . Syr. + „L:S tf t . ,h ` r • ~"i`'0.'^ v ~b "".',x,:P, ."ty • wry :I-. ks + kr tiV+l mf^' >s1-~ --'n M1s i^c,M1 u. tut'e q=". 0.u '•t.i+ P a '"S:4• d ! S' : , Y , ~ s, .,,='r.y,, a..`d , i•:lY -,r~" , .tn9° ~'~a ,t.+ ~ a ~ .M1,,.b-.:J ,•`i}r .'y.^ ,f r C'*~ 9 t h. .+.EN. . ^`S-^• , n,.r, a,.. S' a'-1 UY 6%t. •1 " ZIA IPY t5 ~,zt,°, Ty 1<* * ,r p G;Y , •I, . 44 'kl^' "s ~4 «M1-,,wi, ' S, m v °itte , ,oS • q. p}p*. rr...x~ "nf± k.,d,-' 'V '.1 .s- r v„.s,_ ~,:.;Sa „ a;.a.,,, • tY"" « 'u, to ~ a , : wlgK a ,•MF^' ~r+'. l"'~ i-~ 4 ' ~c' aep Yr •v G~ tll':.YI v.Y~ .:tr' *>•S , fir: 7 Y'b, a'I., ~r ~ qie 't v'r: i- ,r ,>~9 fit" • s ,fk,'S,'"~:',r . i .,t.r. a„_ ..~r -t~ r ''a s'+ "k. ~ ••sx'4" '•r,,.n ,"b'.° X~ . :'a*d" '°5 ~'=R+ rs+.t^" .§xr,y` '°3x~~1'". t IN '.~.r-J-e-e , m;: i r{{'m`• r 't~.'',', dirt a ~:~y,-,,., .•tez, '4n ''f~ Lf ,iiY > ':'a"`+., u ;Yr.`s6:, , ,.•F. . m ,dy . "+a:.S'k . .r :-3. .F>r, t..a '+r L' - k. , ,r '~r`d+" • ..L, 1'":{. ° `1". ! :::h " F . n3~.-'y'iu. w. -~„y-,~'yb tel. 1k- .^,gHJe1 n .k} a i~x: 'R y- ' ~-a,,.4', < A^ a~." ,er-,C`:,. tt r''.,.y; •nn ''w. #:xn„e. -,'91=` r, .",c , e. ,.t{;`re.g „ y„,.~ raid"'?..Y•, ~ r,-, ,t> „a=.°t.,.:L'•r*Ya"a'r.«^k,, y, w~, 4.r %^s . ,L +f'.~s. - ,..~Sr ^~.='+.x~ a x r E v L V~'~4r' c - , „ , gkTrcA;f,• ..2 ~ * . 'h `m € ' ,4. k }Nka"'. ,rc r':t . G"i ~:,,J9~".. iv<w~, tr.s, t =Ek,c o-• ,utC•''-"s' jc, , •YSn , s~ ru "aw,'y.4~ "Y.,v~ ~ r ,~nv. ,ST 'gym ° 'ir , f., _~F,uK`w:$1,}•,.., . , ,3 .Sr ~ ,3,1t. ' t• °x < »„A- `5.^n ?i e ~rvS' 1 qtr 3`-.< , ;t^1.:5 4. r K~ ,=•~,.e . n ; s? t~5ti'2 r a- : «a# ny,,•~t .e r•,"Z, ~gr . ~ :J. . v,. t., p,' 4 i~ . 3., •,,:^:2' Y, c i ~ w7u ~ ~4Y 4 T t . %l'°7Ya ,4nw, k u , Y'.' :,rq r~: l~rc. "w'.S r'~: .V'r"4. .•.t~a «,,,Ta'w~ T. v. ?z ~F ,"'✓6+ ' ~ ."sue 1 , [ ~v~..,w' w 2 , -q3 `C sA F, ,'+rni`"h.-.,v'~ y'. r~"~'~" „~.r .`v' 5~?'°;° S .m,.. ~,r, ?aK •s., ~*1 ~ . ^•,h •.g.. » w. t - ,r ~,r; ^ F .a. , t :--`r•+9t- 'tx:~y _S' ,„"~.1 Eta a t• a- "F M..3 ,'g'n~, k a',, ~,'.v G ` °+4'°t ' 1 1. , 1 „}x ~'k'*r, ,r e°n b-, u'f, .oi ,YL 'xn' a..~" ^`u f ~ ~'.:.r,s'3>w•'. ~ :F^' . -",i''.^l`M 9N,,,,:.+, p Y. . tL :\w`5~- n~r,Y *kr+i._, ~ k +`~`"f - . ~ ,.-5... .'t,'%:°-4.: +.,+n , s a : s ; 'iS.'[r',,,. ~r r., uff . ..wt c "S%4: i• . , , , ^ s ,a,h. s ' ~ • as't: ..,e- .,-s, .:4, sr ; ~ . ."fi, " ae r s n •~.;tru X, a St g` ^ d ~,.•~,-S:1:N e4' >x-:5•:';~ 4 1f1 .`N : ~:'3+ 7rrY^ry. ti - ^ N .7 }N. y, F -l,N ~.,x .'S''T^ t s .J•"yY h° .S~. « 1F'?: =.d.r° , r,qq i "n"t~,• s s .!-^r, 1," ~du', . ~i- u : a 8zn.' x. ~ 'a , `c:: $ rN ,k: ~ '4.,I t~ ;«e„ , ,ty"„>.`-x,Kr.,.m.:uy „n'rs . t .,°,`r :"r,,-:'' :.Rs,{.+.Fr-i+ :v , . X,rf> ,"~"+t.>~.:,s'°:., .a .o 3:?"+:, ~ >"~'!4"r~(>~...S.3, aa,.., a*. + s,- „h?•4.. , r.,. wik,cra-~,,,`.,..;'-~... . .:~"`,z.a:^C.ra,. v >,,v ex ,~u'c~ :,r . 'r ."r , ,,9a ,Y ,a , , c k...~ . -iail.P~~rA l U ~:^~'~^.~'a_ srA' .3""s ,L 3,~~;'.°,, Ct2,~°<° F "~$'C., " -s 3, '•a~ s, f~. 'e , u. - n10 , rtdi nX/fir ~~y€^,'K a ,d l.. ' ~ k;" t r r c . #u. , ta.: m ~ . av,r " ^c~". , s+r ` m - rk .~s x `c`~~+`3',;r ~ ,d , ~Y +h.n„ rM1,..y 7:~ *",k,~ 'w1 , ~ a ,1 .fix "i- v ~ m ;,1= 1~ n~,.l 7 ,G , ~ „fir'e »¢a'''„nak' t. •+1a : , rh ,x k , pS:{'° .:3„ ey~~ !G - d„ ,AJ • rd F i >a'J; ~y :r'J > : ~ CS+°J, :C%' 3 b. ~ '~sa Y° 'i;.: ,`zr t tt~~ -1 ,'*„G •,J.,. 3- 3 ^ ~:=i* urarv '.'e4'3;e yY, ak'., i ~ s,r, °'.r»~'s '.2x h =..1. , tr^~::~,".a,,:,, =t 3 ?i : ~{'r...r .•.,e~, ,-t, va"', , ~ , . ,7 s~ - ti =,a a t, +c,«,, , ,n-.; ~ fi.Ay,ky"Fr y vu _ t, ,.i"!°a"" z ,r ,.t,. +'xs",' „ es'~, .a,..«s, „Arr...., e r a« - - ~~r°, , '`.n: „-cJ .r~. k,° °.lr;.~ 't:;'°- ,r . « , - : a.,3.£t'+:. `s,: ,.~:.4ie.••.> .,f ~~~y'z4n.-.-,,, st - .er a,n. r' , .•..t Ot!rIT 00 tmm, M_il r"11-A } wx ra 754 77 Siv S'j.~ fi a3~ - _ - -r r 1 - 2~ 0.01 v; 'T w-g (3) site characteristics ~r ro -r9,,,-y(a) present site shall be of a size which can accommodate (the) sre ''r - 4, resent and future uses, but shall not exceed two acres. M,s,-t mac. £ _ .ss' ~`k.~ xt yti (9) Impact Assessment e,~ssu,,~r,Y. - (a) The scale of the project shall be compatible with the -"3^4.n~~~4''~r surrounding uses. Site configuration and characteristics, and relationship to the street system, shall be such that privacy of adjacent ¢s. non-commercial uses can be maintained.'-{ - f,M (c) It shall be possible co incorporate the unique features into ~St crew rt? "s Ei,, the site design and development plan. (d) Associated lights, noise and activities shall not interfere ~~a t3 b with adjoining non-residential uses. 2. General Commercial W~ - General Commercial areas are intended to provide for major retail goods and services. The uses classified as general commercial may involve drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale and repair services or provide services to the traveling public. The uses range from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments. It is intended that `-"~~"1- these uses be adjacent to arterial major collector r Zj7 A. Scale ~4~' (1) Trade Area. Varies. (2) Site Size. Depends on development. `t9'rY z~ ' (3) Gross Leasable Area. Varies.' 5~ar B. Locational Criteria=` ~x fti - (1) Spacing and Location rY'"'~' x- a N9, K ix rot (a) The commercial area is not surrounded by. residential }T4 , r p o z n; districts on more than two sides. I-- N ' - (2) Access`" - (a) The proposed area or expansion of an existing area shill not create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. Such determination projected traffic vobased lumes, o the street speed 1mit capacity, n existing and of f x'(~~' `sp3 umber turning movements and the traffic generating characteristics r zec of the various types of uses. ~sa'x~,4 c ..row k- r - (b) The site shall have direct access from a major collector or ra s tom` arterial > w-~-teaSO t y} k - ~-+.y Y - C a 9 s~ E II - 82 ~:.{F!~JT v r ~Ft xi a y~ a~+7 ..xt Y' - 's _ r°'^"^`^+. ~msr'~'.aa-:3SFf,F '~`'_tia°-'r~{°w`~'= q 4 ~~~y~~' t '?1~rrYy gr',~ Y 4 EF i X F kd, 4 L ~'`~"'k, ~~1"`yu:}.il,FL.,'£.d: wIXt E i 5 •r ^,~.r~^.. - e= - t ~ ~ 1 tt <t 3 Saw- .0MOVARWA toy x_ f `{c1 1,01 WWI 0" ( dv P 3 ?n.sa`r"~~a ~Ct~~~ ~v1 y`' ~,„r. r• r _ z t 5"cf" s y'am' T, `4 w .,-z. r - - s s - r - t s •3 - AXIS x.'.~,,~p -ms's-,-~a~~.=.'~.~x~`.;.g~: ~..~y ~;.'~,r"'=`': ~,;;.,.-'~..r=:...~.•~- - (c) Public transportation shall be available Co the site or - -r ~ sl t general area. w *w gg- -(3) Site Characteristics (a) The site shall be of a size which can accommodate present and €f F-~ - c a projected uses. (b) The site shall have high visibility. a (4) Impact Assessment (a) The scale of the project shall be compatible with the surrounding uses. {rpf.a,z„~.';, "SR g PH M--- 0Rr,, k- - (b) The site configuration and characteristics shall be such that .ijtfr'`"-.,'`> -'g - the privacy of adjacent non-commercial uses can be'''ts L ,yam .a, F maintained. _ 4 ''s w:sf mm MR w- ARIA y't (c) It shall be possible to incorporate the unique site features X into the site design and development plan. (d) The associated lights, noise and activities shall not I interfere with adjoining non-residential uses. r`""4y tx s 3. Commercial Professional tt- Coa_^.:erciel sional areas are intended for a diverse range of office ;UN Z,`:_ mot, sF+ uses and supportive uses and to promote user convenience throughout the~t' Ml- City. yA. scale ktMi-R =no MORE # i- t (1) Trade area. Varies i "true} _"'ze,y""°~aK'"3-}` -ter b tr r / (2) Site size. Varies s „ras as v (3) Gross leasable area. Varies ~''s>xrrta r.~ B. Locational Criteria ka Yt a. n Now (1) Spacing and Location ~...y ' r t- t r ,,Y e<a--t; t s (a) The Comprehensive Plan map fixes exact boundaries of the - J{ ) commercial professional area. rr 7" (b) The commercial professional area is not surrounded by rz -r residential districts on more than two sides. xa t - o-xF" t (2) Access _w w= r e (a) The proposed use or expansion of an existing area shall not create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. Such s~ j a determination shall be based on [the] street capacity, existin and - £ g projected traffic volumes, the speed limit,' y~r S)x k ; rNZ~ number of turning movements and the traffic generating characteristics of the various types of uses. ~r.k; ins r'i vx f zx s ty'.aa *rJt'~~ WMA k&Jw ~,*~,~'~k3+= f v£r ,e 1 ,.1., ~xv "s ~~.4 E~` J ~Y !23 4 i itR ~6 3 ?MW 11 - 83 ".4.^yr ~ r k N~r a. = v { ;r^.2h;s:`.!"•a- y~z { s '-f.y ';S~z,.. Ing `Iy,`IS'-.a°3"U:"~'r)::~fir_', E )k" +ygy ::K t+~s~ss~~"~^''' sir py. j ryry, %sd ft _ " f - a~ { _ x x - 7 a ~5 eu i i sa „ rvs5rn 9Y. 'A r -V J r~£^ ' G^k"al~'"+ # - s" ~ ~v~""a;»s 1 ~ "Fc':'- _ i - ~ I '4•`,.. - t k ✓y-' 'a. -„`~~z'kY~ ~ y k i✓. ti Ilf ~ ;t.y ! 6 € %SF 4 "3~ i Fy W~ PAN d a ~6 , s i~ kn l 1, JI not r r[ ,:,-:mow -i, .,1 3.+„ fc.~i a ~'~.'o. •.eJ-,E~r.Ys~y 1'A`'. o. t , iro ,t . ..t1 Yi k Y J{ [ ':4'.- J' ~ S m "Y" ,^ur ,J• ' `,his x' 44 r~ Iii,.. ah•~. • ~ ~,.Y = d F" ~ R. 4 . d r.= • .~d-r, r.~ Y' '-'a.n'"},'}" , - J 7 T. a.>~ - ~ ,1, "t • "'!"„'c^- a - .~pjj .e~'~,; %~1;' .,,.s , t ra: ~„A,,,4 ^ .t, r~4.''~ _ , A ~`~~,'1. ,a 'e Nr., m,t . a f ••+I"- 4,.~'*i'*b.~ ~+n.^t YYss , , Y.'Sd . P ,t wr., z I . ; a . d"," 'F , . , t "'~e-` , ,tU'a ~ ' t~ . an a'r ~t. :'if ?^tv<, : i°r+*r= ,hs .a++ J. ' +2' a• 1 V '1 ~ ^ S- ..YY "q ~ r:~r _ a rr" ?;t ~ ' •ko, t - "M*,_^ >t., :f~ 33 ,..~'ki-~~:c.' ~gT.~~,S~;,a4 ~c,,p w.Y.,~.;s^ ~a ~r~''t -.~'%t.. x,>~ i .da•t•S'., t-'--: A ~z"~'.~ - 's :"~<'»<. ~•~?n ,^.r`r-"z.' ~.~*ir e+ 3.3sa .d s' 1•f>✓r.:4^,-a,, ,'i?^T; . ~r- _'w~,..eLm 7'. ~u ,t T,i',"' ~ s _,a. 5`7,. ,'3'.. _4~' -;a n, h:,,:P , 'Fa9-1'..;, ,r,.ax ,rr,. •«s.,k. r.,d"r x , t ' ~h . ~ K Gi~,.-',s... ;i, x. x'i ,i . ~ "d`, r 1?. - ~ ""Wv ..~'zT„r ^k , Mt ,.'%r ^ a r,•r=s& ~,s• L.i., %c,+r Lr,-a~ah 1v,. • r'ua 'e'u' +G~~ -'Y ' 'u.,y,"., t. ^W?w,,.N:, "dik• -,f u.•^l~ ,aY S ea.-t, ,9F~ ~ s.~~~K~ 'y` ?kn' ..tz='Sr,+,.r. `t. -'TL'"'' 4 .,ut" ~a^~ I i~ L 4 `~s• [>':t ..S , , ~ =2 ~ ✓ r ~~yw Yi"'✓n L5. ~ i~. uE'' ,E .P 'lA^ . ..'~S.t3 w ~1,'. , p5'tn-n t.. e:~, i, 1 F_,k,+v vl:f'"'ds`a, V ~ 4"''« ♦>L L:'lv '.'j'9 ,K^ v:~,+. S k' 'xp..iP cr,4"°Y~+rr k 4'5; w„S ~ H G':rr x s7%, f -.'n ~ R= s 3 tiF ~ rk-^fi' :~s "fi ..3:':..[r '"3 ,Ik • .:i• ~ r„¢„ a „ 'd 'b'+-' ~T ' ~ s ~Y"? qty ° ~ +Fv L. L 4_ s n.. .,t. ,.rF-..~ a ;h+~?' t,,:,:'-, , r::ac, ',^,ro ; ~?t.: ,l4f,~ t, ~ ~ t ~ aK ~i 'r <Ir a , -r w,~ ' rt= -..3 ,ky'• ; ^ ,y, +G. 'Naer 1}' 4iY,•f l °f `e ! n.t~'_ y~.~~.W. ,4a r%~ q,1 w, t. , Rr~~` ' £ M- .,t :!<a n~ Y~ l- ✓A' ..3a • T r +^Y _ 1, r` .f ~ . w -h:• t Dina ' . t . M h . a .rw e:r'~" Gr 'spw t ' rx . ~ „ ~ k ..:'d>R, Z.; aa'. r g '63 g '.:h':«`.,;a.. 1 •rlr') t 'H . a"'°rt' a ^ .,u ~ :rx'~ ~ ~3",~xw ,1 . _ r, ['L " Man . ~'~rK.. t.°G' :":✓~i _ a.,u+'F'. 1.. n,4•, tv ,n ' r s~.':c "•'.t.._ , G:~ee, , rr y✓,e ,i ~ u,vs4 ~ ~ . ^.r "v ~.wn • 06 Vii,. •.Y^.''[t" ,x S ,.,,r. ,3 a-.'. > =1. ...n.', ah e%^,`, f „,.,w .3. v^ ,tw. ` .yu,. ".te'2•-rv7 . F - 2 r.,:t; i`a^:~n.k. .,.,..,"E a4 v +.•,y%,,, 9,FR, -Y. „y,..y ! iYEt. . . r n Y .tc. v 3a, eF v , o- , c i y~{ , , • ' svYti t ' Ci., 'S'am.^,6":,:'in, . Pn: 'YB a.a„ ,,,sr,...~_ , Y . q,,, r..~d'i;~, ,.fi" tr.,'dr,,,Ar~;.at.~.• ,..~_.y t A .h=. ;,A a "..zR a A -.i< ,yip . ~ro . ~ • „'x^. a ;tt'F' ryc i. r a r.y?:. ,.ii"?! e. =s n. ~ r "i,Jrt ?,a w"~ '~4 's4 • -.ti ;•t~ a F. ~ .a 5 .5t t t» ..W,......xi,s::~s.«~.u' ;>r:or~r' ,.,'ea,'au ,:7 a': t 4 I~ ':rt' ~-F'' <rr~iw•: "rr%s ~'at`_,>'. .€..,rt•_, At 190N, f• ..a a :::t - -+'l~ ,a '~l,,;i.`~-. a.'+`_~' f _ ^ ; •t ~ ~ s,, "Y xk { q~~ r- Ya~ t . h A Ignm9f 7 `~A y[' ' Fas if -_-f lug 4 1 a n } ~ 4 t 1 !s tµ k f% t :x 4 _ irs t Tt.f"" ! Syr- Nl Ghr9, 3 f't' t I+, 9 _ r 1 O ~ Y e 1 It r tO ~ - y' , # 6 y ik 5 r ~ rye', l~1 t ~ O t WAIT. m x In x > k- 1MIN Amp 1 1 Y 1 ~ r P d" tFFF i .r s - S a O f ~ 7 _ lr t #I~, 3Y ' l low Q~! VP k ~ Z '-^I W U ~ 4 7 '.f L`/1 RD t 1 N t } ~ G or too looks r I V 'o 'C 'o r { i4 s~,L s ' S4".r A ppp F M 8 y~r aN} M915-4 IS I } YI W OD 00 t ~ t ' any vjywy ISM of 6 # Y i 14 v U l ` 1-t AT am, 7 t ` N t~ r z f ~ f_ min A - d~ P Not TK Now x,r~fa FK t J{,"'7 ~n t A J7. >ti tr ~k moo, *~~rl a°dLP ~ t ' t o) ap ~ ' r L „rx-' k' F - 7a'[, ~ % %r aa` t - k "s ;4-, Y G "C sEa h t t r .g hr 1 1t ,,sac r E (03 0 r r' R~~LYCaa}r>x~~~' 7q -3 'r" r 4 :~,'n~ ~L { ,ar c^f ^x $h a ' , ~Sw std IG fi~i £ kv ti's Y"* ! `Cy4M1''~` ' ' ~n 7 .r-,%'"'•.Ib~d''Ae~"9~'Yu_s ° "*u~u~sz'- ' t,~ _ aP, ±.1.6,..,<. e,.zr~'x.;r„ •t,,.L_ F - 3~" a'„i;`. •rti}.,, rt•,.-,.1^ p< „a,e ,rite . 4 . q g s~.r • r mk•f. { "rsF"..., t,x;-:y',r .4^> 1.. , k y'Y •,1. 6 ,ra~v-' -Ti r,;'r°e rw~r ,.fie !"'1': 3;•.. •v . ,E, , x°,> .L, ,.ri,. R"a#`F`u`' y~(^ 'y'-'SI s;: -d ",.,'~v", "lim riE.e r ~ .i' AM, v ce` nd,Y k~•~ ~"fir y' u- :':'f" 1 ^r~r, : ,5 ^'A . 'kw rs, < ~ , ,^•u-irti, `~.r~ • „k. 2 A'v^- -a"a' •r!• 'G'>•t" n'~'~ a, r;:}A, ,.v (r; ,k~" a,t d.'r ";3.,.,_s.ry. r..o- C ^w_. ,21?r se :4'. ~^•l e r .ks,e .-,ai.• ,.'e'r^.c .r ~,1,; .t''^+>' „r~~^ .Se- a, a. x a~..a~',' z" ,,.t, 'a;e' , :;A{, "i '.!L . 'S, , ~.c. 6, :~^a';wr ~:•,n=~ ,P ° ":~w, tab u , ~<r 1 ~r,k'; ,'p` 4. .-Ni" •r~• .~r„ ;,'t~'crs-;:,,''y °ae~.. c Frv:,ti.~,k -5 «.x '~•s ~ ~a,. s~ ..c..k d q~ Eq • r „Y -k. aa., .`i' , t't: ;ei•r -rr ca'~o-'+ `'`v„ ar.+^,•.; ,.at, v:,''*': "N :G"~d1 'k, - iyis .d ,.,'Fi>k, ~•-u?i . ~,:,+:i, v: as 'r'S'k_~ . ~ g a,• - 1", c 1`K'' t' ^S a'1x x~ u`,L.`n o"~§R g ztT'~i:,• Q - S"k'•: n~ ilY" . 13t,?„ A> { } ,+i' ~ :Y 1M:.i° Z'9 " 'm t . ,v, r .r ~ . •.x„ ~'u r•~' *3G. wAa s "k+ . ""T=uza^ ,s"+"``F't. r, - , r s r:'.~"'c~. , , i -,.K . r^.. o, i , .,SJ' .x .,',e b. ,s ,t• .at, '.f . C'<, ~ s".. .A , ;'^i. s' a ' '~,«-r to d•~'° „ 3x a >.w.:d. ..,ta" .1 Y_ =°'}~t.M'.~r r~""- ^':'GS."= faik~4 ,~mx' ^;na.' ai, `1'tG~ '6:*rf ~'m. .,te. - >r, t~ 7 .,'[~f€',:4;,^ 2 „k~ •.s i; ,din- 1'. , ~r; .y.,id .-"r "'Y a :T~+"+~''e ,._nxcrs 3~kwt,?,' s x• "ayy,,~~ - , , Ft4 , #~:y: 'Yf'~'~1 "d . ~ , f1f ~:`l's .3 - ' a,' .F.'r x4•v,x' ;r^ „{5 ~ a:. 1: ,x~`°r°.a~ a~'.'~~ f~ = k . a?~. e;' ~ + u~. ~,:Rn .c ~"+r?~ ~'YY; ~;°~'+2^. , , .^vr• ` €;to-. ar..e~ , ~w r. *a'9';~F"'"$>e;a, ,s= ;~i ' ^>~d •x, a..t' ,^o» ,aa•z•~,* ls, .etr ''x, x.:~a3''u ,v S: 'L:~'i ~'.:.?"•dr rs•.' .+w'. st,,,t ,;;t~^'' .,z•,> .;,a ' t .'+;'.r„a. ~r~,, i, c r• .~c h ' a, a. h , t'.":fi't'+- +~•'e,re-:1 ; :~ui -a.: a „ , DIY,"•. ru, r" x rte.,^r, b,a r caRTf^. ,k .A yx' ^~Y .,7 s .zl N' A.. f:" , ~ t, yl'+L> • 3 '^i,.Yt.,1 -1 r 5z" 'rx» „ . ~,«k- v".F ~ - , 1, ,i~i ~ 'rF •~'."wi . i i....._ 'r~~:- nd, 'r', Tl+r,, :.rte:'.- ,r 1 afr~,i~r'.s .'E+. , n, G~ "`#k" °,'x'r g-~~,, a;=°,~'N;e "^'1 m. 3 .i4 ~'r~ r`.;i^3u'.FS, .;C~`Y'7o r• ,,.,Y:."r"'s.}., .1eiL3 ,L,` R ~,.F ~ ~ -P •.3~~"7ty d' .r a. r : w• ¢ %..#k-.,t rn€s?r. >~r'„ +;"3.1 ' •,§s~;~.'„ 1,". tk+td~ . ^k , - g ~ ~.`tiq. ~ v , 7r ;''a'a m' -%tic"`,'-"°-. ..a tt, r~+.4t . r-T.', rr.~ s .,'fiixa ::~'i, ~4 ,`'4 .li E'r ~ ,s.,,~v-'i°„a~,li ' `cYJ!„I, ~ves,aw. ^,J»I. ,>a 1, ,~1 <t .r ro- „r„.- .Y;t. , r> ,~C. , . ;°a,,. ,,t~, , u t~<., .s[, t t • t°, aa• E,i~ ~t `~+••:~k fk. r -0,. a`;~ ' au %~~ti.. ~~":r a t r"k~: ;-r i. tx ~M .'L u>; < .1„t{ ",ry b x. ~ ,`•7.ty ; w~ ~ .r. a'3a , ~,.,.~r 'p ° k 4 S .far'k,', i, aw S r afro! . X.,G SI'-,Y _i. `],',t & ! 'c.- 'F,C,.r , d ' r' ,.fi,ru, r"F+^ , ,=3?q;` • "1n'#' CiS~'y 4 ..h,: t~~r~ . .•S..v.+, ' 1+' s ~ ~";,,~.~a`.r'Y., wrz •i, , ssr? , 6J:,•,. z r't`: ,S%v» .v~` =n'z' , "~r;~x ~ '.i xA'.GG r x..: .,y Y. t,. f a 4•. . 1` : z , - =§5„ 2 "a~ -nzf.'~. ,ra ~'~p~+-~~d, G 'd:' Fs>a,., ..t- tea' -G ^a, ,rr"!. 'c. ~•t.,'~ .~..c, 4" .9t.~-,^a ~"t~i Y~'.. ,f„,.~ -T~@ a , .hr, s• ' }.r r, tw', =7+,, P x R ' x t~Pk <s~~ r s ->^:9"C" '`:aa' ww, . h~ ~."•`:.a",' ~'r k-R r. ~ a~v<,..."" 'add e ' ^~Tt`' . R-•a 1 „v'^` ' ~ kr'a~, k ~`.,'2'.,3.a`~.h,{ „•'S~'r', °fi . :~~t;:'.r , s:r• i::^ a', s' E w. ><U°,- a, 'r`3~, [ n„v: s,' "i'., '.'b ,bra i•.rzg,.N `25t„ :e•v- ,;u^a5-'r'P~^ i3 3,4«r..-E- y x } `rn"•'i' wt"„ .4 :..d. ,r7, y x t4 . *4e.e k YJ'f + 1 ,.d. ,aw-.."• ,s .a.rs ..,N,.,.;a~•aL. ~a a. s.,,.< ,t^Y~ia t' - L. - - - f 1, - - - - a,;~ F`-'Ly 4 1 - OF ZVi~ -f- -1 V , I - , , , , , ~ I - , -.1 - -`P3-fir- - r z f h - - - - 3 - 1 r§ 's£r - r t- s r _ w L - k a" 'k - at t - €t r - Sa r t3 3 'tee t =u' TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE r-,~ _ 1. ' - - n 1830.010 r ; It % Chapter 1830. PROCEDURES FOR 3. The Director, Y # . ~.s 11 DECISION MAKING: . - • t { LEGISLATIVE 4. Any persons or the person's agent y - : authorized in writing to make the application. 5 t ! 1830.010 Purpose G! < 18-MOM The Application Process B. The applicant shall be required to meet with ~ i 1830ZM Time Periods: Submission/Hearings the Director for a preapplication conference. 'A s i 1830.040 Additional Information Required, ~ Waiver of Requirements and Report C. At the preapplication conference, the t ; Required Director shall: c k i 1830.050 Duties of the Director i ,t - - i 1830.060 Recommendation and Alternative 1. Cite the applicable comprehensive plan , z, Recommendation by the D`.r•ator policies and ~itap de ignarion; y e*o3 xn _ _ - 1830.070 Consolidation of Proceedings j a ` s_ 1830.080 Public Hearing: Notice 2. Cite the applicable substantive and r r 11 " 'I - _ Requirements procedural ordinance provisions; f, , 1830.090 Mechanics of Giving Notice and x ` r - Failure to Give Notice 3. Provide technical data and assistance f A s 1830.100 Hearings Procedure which will aid the applicant; .1 n {Y ~ , 1830.110 Continuation of the Public Hearing cK' ak " 1830.120 The Standards for the Decision 4. Identify other policies and regulations • - ; t , ; 1830.130 Approval Process and Authority that relate to the application; and = - ~r I . r 1830.140 Vote Required for a Legislative 3 r& r Change 5. Identify other opportunities or Js-~n y 1830.1✓0 The Final Dectsion constraints that relate to the application. tIT a t 7 1830.160 The Record of the Public Hearing , w cam' skz 1830.170 Reapplication D. Due to possible changes in state statutes, or g ;--~k?~,.m7~ regional or local policy, information given by 1y ll 18.30.010 Purpose staff to the applicant during the preapplicadon ~ s # , , 11 ' conference is valid for not more than six months. E ; A. The purpose of this chapter is to establish I , -z .1 procedures applicable to the community 1. Another preapplicadon conference isY~ c ent code consid uired if ration of is submitt -r, changesrto the provisions ofethe comprehensive months wafter the prealpplicadon conference six M -~}x i Y 1' _ plan, impler„enting ordinances and maps. (Ord. -tl { -1 ~ F-7:7 il 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 2. Failure of the Director to provide any of ` _ - y . 1 r a- h y - the information required by this chapter shalt k~ - - _ 18.30.020 The Application Process not constitute a waiver of the standards, criteria, ~r g or requirements of the applications. (Ord. 93-29; ` f A. A request for a legislative change may be 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 3 • i initiated by: , ' k - k- Z 1. Order of the Council; 18.30.030 Submission a Hearings , ~ c, r x' 2. Resolution of a majority of the A. The Director shall receive proposed a E , ,E f ' , Commission; legislative changes twice yearly, the completed ~ t { S 'I. - ~ application shall be submitted not more than 75 i „k - y Y -3 siY#j 's I8-30 - 1 Reformatted 1994 ;q~ 7 S - 2- _ - Y,t'^P S ,cis '-+a'k d 3 L- 3 Ft4Fe I 4 0. r1 TY r r 3 "1 L S ( P' j i" - --M" aXW tp ''max t $Av'. i - "a-`r'_, .'.r ; ',.,I~,' +3" s ; - " t f• e ,,,,t{.w Y - { - _ - s„ to I 4 y C 3 oy, 7~ r, .r--- aJ j _ z p 3 _ k Y r ~eq it 4 _ 1g~ p Y F a£ - x rye - - 4fi - i ..7^aE'w,'a, Ira z _ - s a - z - x - S / F ,a a 4 k , c - g r., - t , F~ a - 4 p ~i - s c - i - i t a °~F $ 4 - Y - - - - t - - - ~~i~~ z n , _ . x Y . ,tea ,.r . w wa m _ w e m- '.r s"".i-"" x k a - - ' i - 'X _ 4 _ - y. 4 _ _ J r _ N w k ~1 5 e { TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE g F "'S t 3 q- 1 't -J _ X 14 Yt 1830.030 r 3 " } e days and not less than 45 days before the first 18.30.040 Additional Information Required, t . , 4 r ~ Commission meetings in April and October. Waiver of Requirements and 7x', Report Required_ 4' ' B. 7tte Commission shall hear the matter within 1 , ' 30 days after the first meeting in April or A. The Director may require information in `r ` October depending on which date the item has addition to that required by a specific code been scheduled, unless the applicant has provision provided: # h - ` e r submitted a waiver. I L' ' 1. The information is needed to properly p t - z C. The Council shall receive the Commission's evaluate the proposed development proposal; I e s s - _ - recommendations and schedule a public hearing and rz 4' ~ within 30 days of the Commission's n ~ recommendation. 2. The need can be justified on the basis of ti zrr a special or unforeseen circumstance. D. The application shall be made on forms , , provided by the Director. B. The Director may waive a specific , ~ r V"~ ' requirement for information or a requirement to t - - E. The application shall be complete and shall: address a certain approval standard subject to a' . the provisions of Subsection C below provided: t f 1. Contain the information requested on the ' form; 1. The Director finds that specific ? - information is not necessary to properly evaluate u 2. Address the appropriate criteria in the application; or t e sufficient detail for review and action; i 2. The Director finds that a specific 3. Be accompanied by the required fee approval standard is not applicable to the fk ~3g~ d err C z' except as allowed under Section 18.32-345; and application. , t' 3 _V G 4. Be accompanied by 18 copies of a C. Where a requirement is waived, the Director [ } - f narrative addressing the standards in Section shall: f £r` , F ° 18.30.120. a 1. Prepare a memorandum to the record - i F. An application shall be deemed "incomplete" and to the applicant citing the grant of authority, Yn unless it addresses each element required by the the specific requirements waived and the ~ i f form and each element required by this title and reasons; ' # A Ar is accompanied by the required fee. I— I' f " 2. Advise the applicant in writing that the ' f r , ~ ' L G. The Director shall not accept an incomplete waiver may be challenged at the hearing on the , application. matter and may be denied by the approval " , L _z # authority, and t -1, , H. The Director shall have the authority to r waive a requirement of this title in the manner 3. Cite in the staff report for the application' r r provided by Subsection 18 30.040.8. (Ord. 89-06; the specific requirements waived, the reasons for k f - Ord. 85-45; Ord. 84-29; Ord. 83-52) the waiver and the specific grant of authority.' k } { ri (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) ` E "`X - a r "'a k - r M_ [ a M F - t tY 6 R, - +'t , E l ' ' 18-30 - 2 Reformatted 1994 Ft } 1 - zj ,e„z 4 _r- s 5 - Ivry =5 1.i'"n4( _ b 1- - -S -FQ b - r a',ky i1 { y t ,ryu-f,3, r_ - c .Ft c c t}. 1 E 5 r F K 3 - y'gt - - •i Fly, 4!i 1 t -3 Y .i fi / I w L-1- Z' ~ , . , . _ ~ - - -1 I ~ ~ I ~ I - T; , ; - ' - . , x " i a- r< i F . : , t sue` - r } - - - , ii(t t ~ I *11, ~•l- ..7•c - -fit- K. os C + f A .u. '1 4 _ r ! 1 i' f y a X s - 4 ~J U _ - - 1 _ c.; - - - - - ,11 ,11 -1 M' ,y.3' n - -`i'h - - - - rK- 3 - - _ _ F 4 1 1 s.... t i _ _ hr {.j.- w~ y' 'i~r^c _..»e....i.w...a...a--.- - - .:w.ba._--..... .aus,-.orr.......nm. u.-.....-.~ _ a S r d § 3 - , I TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE /--,N 18.30.050 s , r ~c t 18.30.050 Duties of the Director 3- Make the staff report and all case file 4 r t - r: materials ,available five days prior to the A. The Director shall: scheduled date of the public hearing under - " k Sectiun I8.30.030 in writing; and 1. Give notice of the Commission hearing a as provided by Subsections 1830.080.C and D 4. Cause the public hearing to be held 1 and Section 18.30.090; pursuant to Section 18.30.080 unless the applicant has requested or consented to a delay. n d 2. Prepare a staff report which includes: B. The Director shall administer the hearings k- 1 n r a. The facts found relevant to the ( procrs may} F i proposal and found by the Director to be true; s 3 C. The Director shall transmit the record to the t ` b. The statewide planning goals and Council for a hearing as set forth in Subsection p w guidelines adopted by ORS Chapter 197 found to 1830.030.C, and: i~ be applicable and the reasons why any other _ goal(s) and guideline(s) are not applicable to the 1. Give notice of the Council hearing as 4 ' - y~ y - proposal except goals 15-19-which whit'h are not provided by Sections 7830.080 and 1830.090; [ _ _ applicable to the City of Tigard, and need not be i r 'T ' 4 ?1 addressed; 2. Prepare a report which shall include at t e, r a e i a minimum, the following: - a _ y ' y c. Any federal or stare statutes or rules h ^ t ~ f .11 . ~w ~g t the Director found applicable, a. A copy of the staff report submitted z~~` ; , to the Commission; 3 t x g d. The Metropolitan Service District k Fyk i 4 plans and rules the Director found to be b. A copy of the Commission applicable; recommendation; and 5~1 z,w e. Those portions of the comprehensive c. A copy of the minutes of the ~z plan found to be applicable, and if any portion(s) Commission public hearing; rkr=`m> of the plan appears to be reasonably related to the proposal and is not applied, the Director 3. Make a report to the Council; and . } y shall explain the reasons why such portion(s) of , , p - - the plan is not applicable; 1 4. Administer the hear-ngs process. E .cR - ? f. Those portions of the implementing D. The Director shall maintain a register of all ~ ` ; p ordinances relevant to the proposal; and if the applications which have been filed for a decision. s F provisions are not considered, the Director shall The register shall at all times identify at what n F ° 1 explain the reasons why such portion(s) of the stage the application is in the process. s - it, 3} f ordinances were not considered; and ' E E. The Director shall maintain and preserve the 'a g. An analysis relating the facts found file for each application. The file shall include, t ` '4 to be true by the Director to the applicable as applicable, a list of persons required to be k iii c- riia and a statement of the alternatives, a given notice and a copy of the notice pursuant to --'-1- ~ 11 . , recommendation for approval, approval with Section 18.30.080 and the accompanying r modification or denial, and at the option of affidavits, the application and all supporting 3 - Director, an alternative recommendation; information, the staff report, the final adopted L a: a V 18-30 - 3 Reformatted 1994 V 7 a l i > f"- - x t € ~ LLL F fi if N m"-.T _ amx.:Mfi "'rn'4' N ,.a7'4~da`*..-a'mi'e^° NYFS - _ t " E z ` - s' k'_i - }y x Z T l 5i' gyn. Y t - j -r c~ r "'7 r 't F 4 J't -r CC i F k - j- t + TI I ,t £t - I - 11 1 I n - - - 1 - M } P - - - r- f~ ''E ASK -t. ! - _ - - - - . 11 x ~~~~j~, wv- 1T't ~E.,,p - - - - - - _ 4 n~5fz 4,a. - 2 - - - - ?,x cv;F# _'w r i.ai.-.t!-.ra+._~~.«..xu.a-L r.... uv_w.~.x^+ na+,Lwz e .~xttfy;,''ztj 11 I - 1%0 t - v,, - k`l, 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE f f ::e # 4 ° 1830.060 _ - - _ _ * t } <f document, all correspondence, the minutes of 1. The decision on the proposed plan ` st z any meetings at which the application was change shall precede the decision on the - _ _ _ considered and any other exhibits, information proposed change to the implementation , or A"'Ll. "-Won which was crr°idered with ordinance; l 2Z'~ J I r - respect to the application. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. € - F'; 83-52) 2. Separate actions shall be taken on each , application; and a i a ' - ii 1830.060 Recommendation and Alternative Recommendation by the Director 3. The change to the implementing c + ~ ordinance shall implement the change to the A. The Director shall make a recommendation plan. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52 Exhibit A (part), - $ e to the Commission on the application, however, 1983.) ; , the Director may recommend an `x r in additionx 5= alternative(s). 18.30.080 Public Hearine: Notice d r Requirements % - i B. Where the alternative recommendation - I * ' ? involves a different plan designation or a A. The Commission shall hold at least one }pl rr'` _ u ' different zoning district des;Kpatio. than is the public hearing on each application request. _ `f vl'.:+' uR . ' subject of the applica ti on, such alternative sty recommendation shall be considered only if. B. The Council shall hold at least one public , `;eP hearing on each application request. $ ° ~~r t 4„ ,1 E ~ I I 1. Nonce of such an alternative is a Yen as - ~ , , nvr- apart of the public hearing notice in addition to C. Notice of the public hearings on the ~r , - aT~-' z the matters contained in Section 1830.080; and proposed change and alternatives, if any, shall - - - 7~w be given by the Director in the following ' ~ t , ux v k ` 2. The staff report prepared as provided by manner: 21y.°4 " Subsection 18.30.050.A.2 supports the alternative _ ~ i I I recommendation. 1. At least 10 days prior to the scheduled hearing date, notice shall be sent to: - K _ z ~ ~ - ~ C. As a result of the public hearing on the , ~ i ; rr j s proposed change, the Commission may on its a. The applicant, s a F own motion recommend to the Council an alternative recommendation, however, in b. Any affected governmental agency; r i ~ ` - addition, the Commission must take action on i I i the specific application before it. (Ord. 89-06; c. The individual recognized by the VV~ F Ord. 83-52 Exhibit A (part), 1983.) affected CIT as the official contact person; and ( + t 1830.070 Consolidation of Proceedines d. Any person who requests notice in as writing and pays a fee established by Council r a , A. In the event there is an application fora resolution; and I I- - r legislative change to the plan text or map, and t application for a legislative change to an 2. At least 10 days prior to the scheduled f f implementing ordinance text or map, both of public hearing date, notice shall be given in a ,i t ' which involve either the same geographic area or newspaper of general circulation in the City. c k - { t the same subject matter, the hearings may be } C consolidated, however: D. The Director shall: , r a s - ! _ -ate C r r Pt.'S ~J Ig-30-4 Reformatted 1994 ~i yy} z# 'z v F i 1 - , ~ ^a, ( t 1 - - _ j t - T " - 1- - f d m^ a y i - _ ~x s't'-' # 3 - - . 3u- n' ~'M' s+'-AY k,.t' ';,rr.s'` t,.~ N'yM`. t 4 3L 1 - -I 7/f # - ■ - a s - sa - a - 7 x4 6u "..s L 5 P 1 - f 'i S ~e{ a i &N41 [ t { - ] - " L C ` I - - - w y ils 3" -?'n{, --1 i I 'a -5- 9 .f - - _ ~ S-. k. _ _ Sv f - - -5z _ ~ - _ 11 " , ff ~,-~,,~~N,~'~' ` i~ , - ~ I - : yMy-~' - S.£ - - . - - - 'j ~ 11 I . , - ~1. 71 t'T~y4F, Jys _ _ L. 1 S +T - + _ - _ f ~ f 'S - - Sras~ -Il S sY F 4 S-' k 2'^._~^ w........r_- xaaa.aaa ia€a_wv - .......+.nrw.1-.4.w..~_- .---r-------..__ @ Y{3 } r~ C - YY _ TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE iii~u.Go~ .1-- ti' 6 § 1. For each mailing of notice, cause an C. The failure of a person entitled to notice - i affidavit of mailing to be filed and made a part under Subsection 1830.080.C.1 to receive notice L - of the record as provided by Section 18.30.160; shall not invalidate the action provided a good and faith attempt was made to notify all persons r ,Z~~':=''l - r 11 entitled to notice. 2. For each published notice, cause an 1 affidavit of publication to be filed and made part D. Personal notice is deemed given where the 0 ' of the record as provided by Section 18 30.160. notice is deposited with the United States Postal ` ;.rvs; - - - (Ord. 93-19; 89-06; Ord. 83-52) Service. l''.'l - - 'w ,;_r: - aW 4 s } 1830.090 Mechanics of Giving Notice and E. Published notice is deemed given on the - - a Failure to Give Notice date it is published. £ L .sr. - S - i M".~...:.A. Where either the Commission or Council or F. In computing the length of time that notice both intend to hold more than one public is given, the first date notice is given shall be > , J hearing on the same application, notice of excluded and the day of the hearing or the date r i several public hearings before both a roval on which the a al period or review riod s' i''`<< LLr ;'•z _ ,.,,;.,v',: pp PPe Pe :,,,=,:~;va&: ',gig.+.; , - } authorities may be given in one notice in the expires shall be included unless the last day falls i same manner provided under Subsection on any legal holiday or on Saturday, in which _ - , 18.30.080.C. case, the last day shall be' e next, business day. H z - b,. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-512) * f B. The notice given to persons entitled to k s . mailed or published notice pursuant to this 18.30.100 Hearings Procedure ti . section shall include 'he following !nfemation:;", A. Unless otherwise provided in the rules of >y=~s 1. The number and title of the file procedure adopted by the City Council: ~ - - ' r au I containing the application and the address and V. r kxn phone number of the Director's office where 1. The presiding officer of the Commission ' : - } ` additional information can be obtained; and of the Council shall have the authority to: - * I 7 - 2. A description of the location of the a. Regulate the course, sequence and k rr c - ~ ' prop^.,srl rca,---a ca...Jlat- to give notice as dec..-im c. :..g s 'F v to the location of the affected geographic area; b. Dispose of procedural requirements `rz - ' r 3. A description of the substance of the or similar matters; and a 5 a j t ° I proposal in sufficient detail for people to qtr F determine that a change is contemplated and the c. Impose reasonable time limits for 3 h place where all relevant materials and oral presentations; a ! information may be obtained or reviewed; and 2. No person shall address the Commission { I 4. The time(s), place(s) and date(s) of the or the Council without: r public hearing(s); a statement that public oral or n written testimony is invited; and a statement that a. Receiving recognition from theF ' the hearing will be held under this title and rules presiding officer; and ! of procedure adopted by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure b. Stating their full name and residence ~ ~ set forth in Sectier. 1830.1C-0. address; and t 18-30 - 5 Reformatted 1994 C) a J y J - 2 _ (t, j y3 to L ,1 z € 1 - F F - _ 7 - 7 i'~`Z U , , ~ : - i ~ . _ " L , - _ , . ' r , - 1 " A ~ " , , , - " - ; 'y _ i rry'r a r - t -t,t f c - R- d f - C Y i _ r* - - - ny( ] C t _ r F 4 - } - - - - y _ 1 i. °'.r K _ ttt s - q - l y {Y 1 n _ _ 0~~-- ki , 71 .1 ~ s 2~ - - - ~f4 - t. ...e..,.n,,iuses.,,,.,..,,,,~,,-._.-L1d.,..,.„--4"a~3.._...r«u,.. ,,-....,..,..~...,..,._._,._._._..,,.._..w.= ...a.~,...,..«r 5 s s spy n y EJ ! .y k n t i ,t. _ n mot, 4.x..x.a:rc... a.,-tr - - - LF x -1 5~ - " 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE ~ -2 ~ . t- , a 2830.100 y a , x y, 3. Disruptive conduct such as audience 18.30.120 The Standards for the Decision d ; demonstrations in the form of applause, i cleering display of sigiu shall be cause for A. The recommendation by the Commissionr~y ` expulsion of a person or persons from the and the decision by the Council shall be based ? - - , hearing, termination or continuation of the on consideration of the following factors: i s f~ hearing or other appropriate action determined € i' a by the presiding officer. 1. The statewide planning goals and + 1 f- , s >r r guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised B. Unless otherwise provided in the rules of Statutes Chapter 197; t "s G procedures adopted by the Council, the € acs ^ r 4 - r - presiding officer of the Commission and of the 2. Any federal or state statutes or Council, shall conduct the hearine as follows: guidelines found applicable; 4 c_+: 1. The hearing shatl be opened by a 3. Applicable plans and guidelines adopted r > _J - r, statement from the presiding officer setting forth by the Metropolitan Service District; - x the nature of the matter before the body, a rf x e., general summary of the procedures set forth in 4. The applicable comprehensive plan , , t , s r this section, a summary of the standards set policies and map; and ' forth in Section 1830.120, and whether the ti * ' ~ z decision which will be made is 5 The applicable provisions of the * „ S'~Z,. a I recommendation to the City Council or whether implementing ordinances. u - it will be the final decision of the Council; t ti --tom F ~ I 2. A presentation of the Director's report B. Consideration may also be given to: r - v MS k ; 3 F }F and other applicable staff reports shall be given; L Proof of a change in the neighborhood or ~r community or a mistake or inconsistency in the x £ r 3. The public shall be invited to testify; comprehensive plan or implementing ordinance 34a *c l r._ which is the subject of the application. (Ord. --L- 4. The public hearing may be continued to 89-06; Ord. 83-52) - allow additional testimony or it may be closed; + z x and 780.730 A'pvrova! Process and Authority 7 _ 1 _ ~ - tip ' f St 5. The body's deliberation may include A. The Commission shall: 1 questions to the staff, comments from the staff or n { inquiries directed to any person present. (Ord. 1. After notice and a public hearing r ' t, - ` g 59-06; Ord. 83-52) formulate a recommendation to the Council to j P£ 11 r ( r approve, to approve with modifications or to , - { 7830.110 Continuation of the Public Hearing deny the proposed change, or to adopt an f n 7 ` alternative; and ' ¢ A. The Commission or the Council may` 3T~ continue any hearing and no additional notice 2. Within 10 days of determining a 1 e " shall be required if the matter is continued to a recommendation, cause the written place, date and time certain. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. recommendation to be signed by the presiding y 83-52) officer of the Commission and to be filed with j 1 j the Director. f , x' , , f l J' L i P T' - A I T x ° ' 18-30 - 6 Reformatted 1994 r CC *sf4 Jil - 4 ,4 4r ,I J , - x}6 f ~ r _ 4 t v ( io r r 1Cf _ x 1 .zFr.:.~:SC:,: w r ~i' s*az x '.v:T %.3Q~ ,7 4t 5" I 1 t'S" ;trj f - 'j'~ilet .;..._y}r' 1' ,1 k " ' r 9-' h It y tsh } - t p - - 5j.,, I .I - ii-m F ,C !1 .k., 4 t i r i aLr ( k F- "P J --,i _ V E - _ l 1 - hi-om-MMMWOMMMMMMISOMMEMM100- _.Y - . ■ ` - - - - - - a ~.y . - -.l i - _ - - - ''gam - - a ~kSLTi . J.r_ _ - y - A~ - 4 < - - - { - - . - - - rY j4' A.}+ ~~._.,.._........aw..ae1-------- , - ....u..., - 3~ F . 4t:,a - .~.5*.i - - t"` _ TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE 18.30.130 ' Any member - the Commission v rc: ^ro._,, with app apr modifications, 4 ~ in opposition to the recommendation by the denial. y ' Cv„a-itission on a proposed change may file a x -y I written statement of opposition with the Director H. An affirmative vote by a majority of the , r . prior to any Council public hearing on the qualified members of the Council present shalt 3 proposed change. The Director shall transmit a be required to decide any motion made with e i copy to each member of the Council and place a respect to the proposed change. (Ord. 89-06; f_ .t copy in the record. Ord. 83-52) _ - -c C. If the Commission fails to recommend 18.30.150 The Final Decision , s approval, approval with modification or denial of the proposed legislative change within 60 A. Tne approved legislative change shall take e t 3- e days of its fiat public hearing an the proposed effect after adoption as specified in the enacting z-=- ' change, the Director shall: ordinance. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) " t ~ u 1. Report the failure together with the 18.30.160 The Record of the Public Hearing $ , r , 4t proposed change to the Council; and ~ A. A verbatim record of the proceeding shall be 1 ti ~5" i 2. Cause notice to be given, the matter to made by stenographic or mechanical means. It 4 3 be placed on the Council's agenda, a public shall not be necessary to transcribe testimony. t - k` ~ a{~, hearing to be held and a decision to be made by The minutes and other evidence presented as a _ , the Council. No further action shall be taken by part of the hearing shall be part of the record. ;,i-f the Commission. g~ , - ° { 8. All exhibits received and displayed shall be * 3 *c , D. The Council shall: marked so as to provide identification and shall W` "%V be part of the record. } k-~ a - ~ - 1. Have the responsibility to approve, -,.~L' - approve with modifications or deny an C. The official record shall include: - I application for the legislative change or to ;ir' x _ a a remand to the Commission for rehearing and 1. All materials considered by the hearings ~ reconsideration on all or part of an application bodv; V ' € t I transmitted to it under this title; - , ~ Y 2. All materials submitted by the Director • ~ " r 2. Consider the recommendation of the to the hearings body with respect to the c + Commission, however, it is not bound by the application; " ` Commission's recommendation; and 1 r- - z 3. The verbatim record made by the " r * r ~ , t 3. Act by ordinance which shall. be signed stenographic or mechanical means, the minutes - ~ by the Mayor after the Council's adoption of the of the hearing and other documents considered; ( _ y k- ordinance. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) y P ~ ' 4. The final ordinance; t a ; 18.30.140 Vote Required for a Legislative - Change 5. All correspondence; and s A. An affirmative vote by a majority of the 6. A copy of the notice which was given as ( ' F qualified voting members of the Commission provided by Section 18-30.080, accompanying - F -I f I} present shall be required for a recommendation ; `a r~ _ 'r `t£ ``3 47 , 18-30 - 7 Reformatted 1994 11/ c @1' 1 ,.J xjr~, 1 s , j , - -1, r ~ - 'I I, 4 y * _ _ 3 y l.1 t t _ ,---3. j', V •„,'.^rt, 'S`✓l'"ti 11 rF.fi 4S 3`S M "A KL T 11 f ix - i _ G Y~'~`,,,-_,- " 4", , L ,,~~:.r~.. U - : - r r,- , , ~ , , i : ~ - . ~ r , , ~ - , ,6 Lt _ i t - - _ t ~-V } E Y - - Y, - t _y, { _ er tit i. i~ - - f t. } - i~ - " . ~ r - _ , , : j , " r' 1z - ~ , r- I ~ ~ ~ I I , ~ ~ ~ - - . : . ~ - - - , ~ , , , , ~ ; ,r ~ _ ~ , ~ , I ~~M` , } ~e r _ zs t % a s 2 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE ~ 5 y U'. 1 ~tr3 a 4 1830.160 t y -7m a~ t E dar:~ and list f pers ho z 1 L$ sons ac sent mailed notice. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. &3-52) it.kzi.`!rx,3 trz'.§ •c•.'--,- r f f. z t F ~ 18.30.170 Reapplication _ J A. If an application has been made and denied +z) * } in accordance with the provisions set forth in ~ M this title or by action by the Land Use Hoard of Appeals, the Land Conservation and rc mat asz t ' k' Development Commission, or the courts, no new g°s> { y prime, } xi ,h application for the same or substantially similar l g r v change shall be accepted within one year from 3 the date of the final action denving the Y~ KM application; except the Council may reinitiate an application upon a finding that there has been a s 1 g rt s substantial change in the facts surrounding the f t+ t4 application or a change in policy which would s acs: ti y s_ support the reapplication. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. J r- f 83-52)E CVs--, d# #xs : ~ r3 x, r p ~ ~,-:art xvEt - . 3tT e ` J S ~ r- s r ~ A ffi°j ~ JI OR i- t a . x~s~.avcn 4 ~ M v v Y 'N ro r 'PAY 4 { k5 18-30 - 8 Reformatted 1994 ~'2 F F3? P 7 r tY^y s-5 { C-pM1 ' al-q 14,Q r-T .Cs,z 1z.~',` 1xa'x u, f-33s` ~,s t -17 777777777 r Sr4''t '£k % ,me op { NO'4- 16 - - r 4 i aywt t b c sir, [C _-4 rrawi ' b 1f i 1"~ TT J i- - *z E WRI! r1 w~~*) # r yak T, V v, 4-4 AN, MA, r . c F~ rt i'- _'ri - - . k~ r - -t - _ _i. 71 +~~~^~T~+}t" _ "T 7 _ v,- "x'S~ t lT - - - 4 y , t -s $ ay t t 3 - - } 4 A ' j' F Y f - - -t....._.._...._.. _.e.-......c mueu.c.,av z.,..__.....,..u,.,,e,.....,~„ ..-w....« - 4 _ _p f b _3 - f TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE . ;'h x - 1832.010 T - F l <.a...... 1. _ rs - Ic.i.:- PROCEDURES r..OP I _ H -p !.'.32.2w iaaiai of the Ayyli2aiiGn: > _ DECISION MAKING: Resubmittal * QUASI-JUDICIAL 1932.290 Standing to Appeal or for a Petition ~.y for Review 1832.010 Purpose 1832300 Computation of Appeal Period and 18321120 The Application Process Effective Date of the Decision r t 1832 030 Time Period for Decision Making 1832310 Determination of Appropriate f 1 1832.&0 Preapplication Conference Required Reviewing Body k { j 1832.050 Application Submittal 1832320 Type of Appeal or Review Hearing: Requirements: Refusal of an Application Limitations of Review K_ * x ' I' 1832.055 Applicant's Evidence 1832330 Transcripts { a 1832.060 Duties of the Director 1832340 Notice of Appeal or Petition for l ° 3 } d 1832.070 Alternative Recommendation by Review . - 3 3 Director 1832345 Fee Waiver for Appeals ' - 1832.080 Additional Information Required, 1831.350 Persons Entitled to Notice on ~ t'y- - Y Waiver of Requirements and Report Appeal or Review: Type of Notice f ; ' Required 1832360 Contents of Notice on Appeal or 1 y 1832.090 Approval Authority Responsibilities Review 1 , 1832.100 Consolidation of Proceedings 1832370 Action on Appeal or Review: Time u r t 1832110 A Decision by the Director. No Limit and Authority to Change the Decision - -'i fir' r Hearing Required 1832380 Final Action of the Approval r o ,1.,y 0c _ 1 1832.120 Notice of Decision by the Director Authority; Effective Date - r 1, 1632130 Notice of Hearings Officer, 1832390 Revocation of Approvals r - ' " - r t Commission, and City Council Proceedings - ; 1832.140 Contents of the Notice for Public 18.32.010 Purpose o- t { ~ 'N ` y t ti 1 t Hearings `-4 a 1832.150 Failure to Receive Notice: A. The purpose of this chapter is to establish, "r y l, 1, Computations procedures under this title for the consideration - r ' s 1832160 Hearings Procedure of development applications, for the 111 1.~ ?tr , 1332.165 Record May Remain Open; consideration of quasi-judicial comprehensive -f-- ~ T Admission of New Evidence plan amendments and for appeal or review of , ~ r ~ 1832.1.70 Ex Parse Communications with decisions. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) "A dte` Approval Authority ~s3 } i 1832.180 Continuation of the Hearing 18.32.020 The Application Process 1832.190 Subpoena or Deposition of 4 r Witnesses A. Applications for approval required under r . _ f . 1~ 11 18-32.200 Evidence this chapter may be initiated by: I 18832.210 judicial. Notice "z , 4 ~ , f 1832.220 Participation in the Decision: Voting I. Order of Council; ii 1.832290 Record P:vcccd_:n9 for Public " T Hearings 2. Resolution of a majority of the t r 1832.250 The Decision Process of the Commission; t r r. Approval Authority T , 1832.260 The Form of the Final Decision 3. The Director; _ - 1832170 Notice of Final Decision - 1832175 Amended Decision Process 4. Application of a recorded owner of ; v - , property or contract purchasers. i v, r, - to - `Y^ 5 - -c ~ A _ L - t~ z. 4 ~ 18-32 - 1 Reformatted 1994 ; y - .~1 t".."' _ l 4; ;six; t x> ,kr t t s - -jK 4' 1 - r - aNy 1~ t - 4 $ - - - k Jh l i# s > _f It _ ? S i - - 2 '9 y, 1 F '1 4 k 4 - S- ) t'~' . yi - x u Sv .3a 5 s - t r fT` F! 3 'P .k }fib t j 1 C 3 /J 1 X l . -1 -.i - n - - - - - }f - _ 4 3 • - - - - `v i# { ;y e _ - ,a P. s ~aA 7 H 'jk - ,-_b - 5 - f CITY OF TIGARD OREGON , K 1~~ ~6 $ t_; 3 S a g _!!PR54r*!SI'IE PL 127 *F*iDFiF31f/BONE CSANGEJZCYE CRDIV NC iwFYDMLVT .kPaTICATTON ' r OF TIvARD, 13125 SW Ball, PO Box 23397 ' z € r .gard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY r - N T r'_ CASE N0. a ~'~~.tg, r T,c T OT9E2 CASE NO'S: c ~I."~,,~;~"":~.,~,~-A,i~""~,,~.*,,'~""~"-i'~,-,:a-- ~1 [t - . ~?e 1 $'s _ RECEIPT N0, " APPLICATION ACCZ?TED 3Y: a1 z - x DATE: a ti , d Sp N Sk GENERA;. ZNFOR.`_4TION K Application 2l EGi2at9 submitted : IM CPEt.? A7DRESS/LCCA IO`7 Nor .~~p:icabla _:A) Apollcatlon fora ski } _(3) Owner's signature/written ' " - x Ioc loolicabie_ ~a~ Y AP AND T,Y LOT N0. authorization - 11 4 fga _(C) Applicant's statement . - A !4 'bt - IZE Not :oolicabie (pre--app check list) x .-r.r k g'`c 7 ~ ~ .s /7~7 nu-a- Not Applicable TY OfrNER. (D) Fillag fee (t ) yam - TRESS PHONE a i a - - - } {'--e n o-, Additional aformat.on for Compre- y?i ~ ZIP sine ??aa Map Aaeadaeatsi_one Changes ~ s $ _ 'L= l=x A. Business Services, inc. _CE) Mans 1_dicatlag property ~ , ~ X 2=55 .75?5 S:: rbLr vd. PHONE =5_-1C9= location (?re-app check list) t 9 ?0 r- and ZIP 9-?SO-00&9 ( List c of ?ronart7 owners and x k an t. ocrser and he applicaac are different addresses aithia 250 feet ' `41-' T f pie, tie applicant must be the purchaser of record (G) Assessor's Map C1) cl # z Y i ` _ leasee _a possess_on :rith :mitten authorization (:3) Tlt-'e transfer instrument (1) ` cm tie owner or as agent or the owner wits r i=tem 1. " e- xZ , _ =or_zation. The owner(s) =us= sign this 5 z~nu 1 ~ b cation the space prov_ ed on page two or k, , E z ' z :mit a r it ea authorization with this p apllcatica. E 1 DAT JETERML%.D TO 3E COMP7QTE: g - _ :ate'-" @ s '_ts x rte. k 4 ~ k- , ?ROPOSAL Su'^iL3Y < - g" , z''I T`:e cwmers Of record Of tie subject property FLYAL DZC_SIOY DEADLLVr: w - x l 4 6 fi „ request a Cormrehensive plan Amendment (if COMP. ?*;:i/Z0., DESIG;ZATION: L err r ` 4z _ x - appllcasle) trom to - and alone Change trom co -at y ~-t; $ 'za `l.?.0. Number: ti' t,, ' " x _ s ;9 ~ e appiicaat requests an amendment to the planning Commission Approval Date: * ,~a 4 z _oL'ow'_ag sections of tie COmprehensire ?lam # Y T~ r y l or Co=u=-'::y Development Code ocationai ¢ f - cr_ e _a or .stablisnment of general City Council A- no=oval Date: r "'ia--t F-c=-t c-_--'... EXHIBIT j ,fit E r l - ik Yf /37 ~`s',f - t t_,x 1 9 i _zs a- grva-err 'i .~%T' ~ Fe F - T ~w.e-,E`+4"""~r'~F '-'is...1Sr. , ."^.;,s fi 'f; J. AeL' :^"TFrztY a•Yfj wm'?vty +n iS:.»'".v,'mswr rL.- f ""Po4 ~ t , S 4 rr. YeEY~"J^' y' - d "fy 11W., ` i 4 - L i A y i yr srt' J .11 , . M '1~ 11, ~ -I.-It, ~ ~ , J , - - ( x~rv'L; YSr 'r1 E X - tT+~ h r4~ _1 { . r ~ r` - , Jt. - , t r a r> s r r st.3 41 `b Y~ - J r - N - 7Sr~ -~P .<r y yr, 1! a K~ l F ayrst }.r,.'~5{ 1 4 X _ _t J _ -4.-" } l~ -i VY r - { Ole `4~4 ? i J yu,7wm' p7 '7 2 Woo OWN wovy P ,i 1 S _ - l` tt, Ste, x4yW _at; Fs k ~7 A f 41„3,F ¢ ~y .,t3k - £.._....n:._.-.....t.._. .zanw .....~.vvucL. ....uov:..ras._--vsa«s...«s»u,mvv •t 4 Y 1 ,k~ t f csy+'e' ~F s;-4~:•;-„~ y;,' t ~•~y ,ate,^:.`1::i::~: - s- _ist an variance, conditional uses, or ocher _aaa use actions co be conslderea F as partyof this application: k Isom= Applicants: 'a have a complete application you will need to submit accachmenes t R, - described in the attached iaf ormacian sheet at the time you submit this 4 t xy p _ application. t 5. :a A??LICAT(S) SHAL: CERT.:Y HAT: ~ S' \ 3 A. The above reeuesc does aoc violate any deed restrictions chat may be attached to or -=nosed upon :ne suo;ect prooerty. -,-max° 'XS S. _f the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and ' ai rr , W? _aicacions of the approval. tG r£ T 50 s},~ C. Al! of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, [s`s _ <c fr, accac:aaencs, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the t~ti' ry, a< ' a appiicancs so acknowledge char any permit issuee, based on his, V 3pO1i C3 ti0a, Say be revoked _ is =pond _-hoc any such statements are false. r.+uerr..,• _ r D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the appL`cacion, including # -M-1 M z the policies and criteria, and %izderscands cae requirements for approving j-' or decyiag -the application. t t S Y DATED this 23r day of =ebrunr w 1996 s r ut " ga V SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) ofjhe subject proper:-!. v/ , MN- - L VA- -INN - 'g 1 f. f a _ 110041 z~, E pp t .,r J dad 5, 2 ) Ft Own, ` Y 3 W avow; x-r c4 t --d (ZSi:pmi073 i~ 7 `.r, ay e 5.M d wt fi § M Mx y bask rz t ,,,,NhsC"F5 - t M own gyp"' -_Y-uss'. k r Z p44u~k.rNx4 ~4t .i s' _ , V1 lxq f T y J E. T om,'T t 5 d y - 1 1-~,k Sz,Y Y v r - t y ! c § _ ),x,~,. _ tutu f SJ~ lei MASN" M, Wpm ~ n # . y F' - 1 - r r e _ r-~ar•r~°~tit~ c ..zn'_^s~~ •s, 1 yes -x° mss- - - - - - _ - _ - - ` - - 2- i h~ 1 3 - % vim, - T 1 BLS ~~C-~~+,•{,~'t2#13 "h ~._.w++.~vw...._..._....+.- Lsv. -.....i.,-....«.~..,_.wx,'1wc'viv......» % P i. _ X f ,g3 STOEL RIVES ALP AS 7 t 5Tz- A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER A '4 s 900 SW flFTtI AVENUE. SPITE 2300 J 4 -rt PORTLAND, OREGON 97297.1268 4 s ?yet Y z 0-1503)221-3180 F-(503)2242430 Y { 5 t-;p e / rDD(503)2-11-1075 `V er f 2^ '4 - 3 ti April 22, 1996 t ` { 1 ~ ( 2a 4~ MICHAEL C. ROBINSON t - Dvea Dial (503) 2¢I-9193 F VIA FACSIMILE f - f { xuG i.zw~_&53..FSUd„fa sL Mr. Pay Valone, Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department - - 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 4 f Tigard, OR 97223 £ Q 'i-07 r. Re: Application by AKA Enterprises, Inc. for Amendment to the Tigard `4 4 gk Comprehensive Plan, Case File CPA 96-0002 s W Dear Ray: K Pursuant to our earlier discussions, this letter responds to questions raised by staff and,` ry others. If you find after reviewing this letter that you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. As you know, this matter is scheduled to be heard by the IZM- n ' , f Planning Commission at its May 20, 1996 meeting. ' 1 Response to Tieard Comprehensive Plan ("TCP") Policies. _fI 1 c A. TCP Policy 5A.- tp fi rt'~ t t "The City shall ensure that new commercial and industrial f) ' ¢ development shall not encroach into residential areas that t s have not been designated for commercial and industrial uses." r f h ~ * RESPONSE: Alternative Amendment No. 1 differentiates between new k commercial areas and expansion of existing commercial areas. Alternative Amendment No. }tP x r 2 applies to all commercial areas. - TCP Policy 5.4 prohibits "new commercial and industrial development°% ~ h from encroaching into residential areas "that have not been designated for commercial or 3 s ; * industrial use". The policy simply states the obvious requirement that until land is t PDXIA-29521.3 26322-0001 .f'f f ! C x 5- SE1tTLE PORTLA\D l'i\COt'1ER, fYA 9015E SALT LIEF QTY W-IINGTON, D.C. u5,~ s a s 4 'x'q MM1 T _ - r N 3A. ! -,T -3 f l 1 - a~' "''•'~,4., cy T-n,~ f'~' - - _ 1 t _ f ~ r„~_ ra + ~ 7 c`° l_ 3g t . .r<-..._~-_ s~-_i .u~._:i. ~r-r. ...E_7SL_,.__ ~..~t _ ...~^t>: - _ ,fw x = m - - . . a_ Y'om` , - ,z; v _ i _ _ aq3 1`7-,-' 4'.- k"~ syt`, a..a..:~..,.c_ .,,..,~.»..,..,~,_.-.....w.„ ......ss...~u e~is:~:N::. - - J , ! ,rte-, t ggur t "tom ,T 9 -'Y- t,wtS. 3 Y 'l d,. 3" '.'"3 Y =3"". l- .t 1 S M. , h 44 ~ Y`a. 3'" r ' r n Y k S'yr - £ 4j 'K 1-1 ~ 1 4m r DEAR CITY COUNCIL: F a 3 "W ! 5 - - fm ! I AM OPPSED _ _ .'3" :r _ - TO THE COMPREI~NSIVE PL AN AMENDMENT o wu< ; - CPA E^_ ` : ii G 'm~'' '•i.-'-~,--_- ~ ~iE~, Y,- - _'fxsa~T~:k'>_:;,.. ex PROPOSED BY AKA BUSINESS SERVICES ON FEBRUARY 23, 1996. 96-000 3 x NAME I rd - It rcl IV,-:5- 26/,, 6J " 23,,d s~ 4 N Y .1> W - '1--- S- - 4 i i Er t a? ADDRESS /SI7~ ~GcJ, G+/.xe.+r # ` ` t -cl- UYZ- ~7 Z Z-3 ~cS rd- , s nN - / "F~'z' 3 ~ 7T , 7 i F CONCERNS: We a'rc' cins7' ~ 5yct~ ~t 3 z 1 k z ~,_-3 -i~a ir, r -rte T - s P " 11 4 X75.. lc r, -c,aa / ~a ,.,.J .--/iii... f'~, 3 _ l t tk,_7 C,- a /;-•~i :r z b~4,~- E 11.11 - ~~~n /s A, - 1 ~p ~t -'rl ~:..L.E .6c J/~«•.,/.:-. r..s~. v,,. .,r c~ / ' J t" ;-„„t Y,Z, ! tr i i .,!~r (f%~.. z,. z'~-s f' .:r 1= i , "(-T- Gci , .-P.'I .i7~u E.~~*-'-r f•„{ #i..,i ,.xz f- - Ey'-,l - r K~/- f-'%L ~-'L~_ - . 1 1'xr 1 zfi s c 1 ,a- rs,- arm - Y' - t'.. k _ r; ;c.-tit € _ a 4{J y,3 - ~E E vl "r44 i` ,T , } - r} rr" a 1 } 4 1 r - 5 _ '1- ~_r- ~ t3'r., k a- .7T A r t E _ _ f ...2 R i ' j r ; ,3 ~6jvd - 5 , x '1 4 .te _ t. F r - uvs~ m y s ~J ~ a i .J7i l S r -...x:. na ak' t,-, t _ k- >S T t i l .S5- 4,- t 9 ~"Y Lit k ^a ~d V r r v ~Vw ,t ..y, ' z - - - z t 57, ~ , ~ ` j : , ~ - . - " , , y -wSssXf -s.~ tom, } t s } ~ A s~ .I~ x r ii,0 lp z !+'^rv"' cs u».«ie.wcaxu.a..w.,.~... - r- !t ~ b 4a r' Vi 1"t - j,P a'z~ ~ xF s ak zr August 8, 1996 ' f L h Dear Neighbors; r 's rte` Application has been made before the City Council to allow existing General Commercial £ - land to expand from it's original plan of 2 sides commercial and 2 sides residential. To f Fr 11111- - ' { change this to 3 sides commercial if the last side was to become "multi-family 11 '`w:khousin a artments " ° a , ' Tms Application does not only apply to the Vatkins area alono g Parin_- Nyw, But the a t - ...-•i z K `1`s,.-!'gat Applicant is proposing this "City Wide". In other words to all of Tigards commercial 4 property that is multi-zoned would fall under this new amendment. - E z f; y G - ° Plannutg Commission Meeting ~ z t The Planning Commission Recommended denial of the proposal at its hearing of May 20, w 1- ' - 1996. Planting staff recommends that the City Council deny CPA 95-0002 because all 2, ,i -gzn relevant comprehensive plan criteria are not satisfied and staff does not believe the [ " ` ' r proposal is beneficial to the city as a whole. f, t ' F P f 11 t s J 0 Ni,,,, h - This Application goes before City Council, Tuesday, August 13, 1996 at 7:30 pm. • M k }~~i r,_; " 1i Please voice your concerns in person or by letter. . p ~ .fin Er, ` If you have any questions I'll do my best to answer them. - ` r Your neighbor, p ~g w'4 a Tammy Dustin " 10670 SW Derry Del! Ct E `it`s Y~ F Tigard, Or 47223 ? ~i r ,Lu s 639-2027 - r k *i r F k t _ ki n - r-'~ y' 7 ~ _ x !W1 , 4 t°-t - - 11 a k -4 ti rsw5~t~ ' s _ t Sir _ _ Y ~_e_ i zf r # - t - r'~s f _ -1 Y 0, ~ ~z } A j 94.!`x; - ,-1 _ _ 4~1, _r X144 f, -p " } - - yt ,4 k - i s L S '#t der t WFT - - ."`r~ee""k°`°,~"'~ - 's 1 - Z` f f .x Ws - a 9 _ y - - - -n. n - r n - tt a 1 C. Nk, U r , , - . , ~f _,4-: i7'--; - I ~ , ; " ~i - I d r- t ~7 3~ ~'PiWf 1{ )S-~ z,#f t -~4 fry>43~T{ t F - f j' ! it c^ Yl- - k - - !2 F` _ _ * L, 11 r - I e _ a ' o- ' F^ '^Y F _ f+k yr _ t w-°'.. .z - W . _ -_.i r_ ,-..1 1 y_.:_..._-aim 7z r ±'..L. '~11 f , 011 - owns, MOM ~ - a 3 i'^t _ -A, ? IN WANth ~a. '#d, 3Y} '~i ~5( - ,~......~awna~.a+..r..a+un+.wri'e..:~: w.,.. +,a s.w.,.saw,,..LV'.i'.......bCaAeawuwaan..a.n.m...,__.e..._d,_~..._....._k.......m1.uw;.~cs~'-•3s3Y~.i6G1'LUR' ~ F F t~ MINIM MAR HOW WhARIAT C. ..1r _'S 'ys} { F y: k y1 - Moo Mass z" - Fx DEAR CITY COUNCIL: r~ S r moms; r z L. - l - _ e ° I AM OPPSED TO THE COWREHENSi` E, PLiuN AMENDMENT CPA 96-0002 *sF _ r PROPOSED BY AKA BUSINESS SERVICES ON FEBRUARY 23, 1996. ,fdl local mom y7 NAME ADDRESS / 3/ Y S J Ica L 011411_3 z~ s ARM £ i5 J. t CONCERNS: tJ G~ZS /l L(9 ~~i G/12C/~GCC~Q ,z a r Am RM; ZWK 14 14 XMIMM Ian ,zs'~ 6A 1.0 o- M r - 10 Y : Yi, pp 'a t~ C%Yl.i ~a"G~ CC... d , { t ~St 4011 u't `X~ ~ 1 M + t 7 a 7} ) sry. 1 r .s* L5'- i'} J I 1 d` sr h g p 4 MONO 9E 7 r- a } §4Y} 17'gy t i - 111" _71 t' a F -v A4. 4 K h x fr' ~ r ~ ~ i KOREA ,t F l ~ T s.v. ~ i ~ i~.:_~ ~ . Y.~ 1< _.:3:. ~ ut . i.... , ~ ~ ~LL-~ .:_r _ . ~ ~ ~.t . ~.i _ _ M.-.. tics t~ .7t Z ? f E E Y ' i ,J µ §'4 Y. .'3 S~•4. a3 - y'RY Y'-? --a':. - - _ - - ct®w~„+.. to ri3.:i •~..a.~... r X- l -3-t mux&v..aG.,+':YY:r✓Sa^l':Llv41it3rz.'HU.a'caxAWVw.aa....., ......u .....__v...._.._.+a.+~` - ' 1 4 r, { M1 = AUG 12 1996 _L{ rs x August 8, 1996 , t- p - ti Dear Neighbors; ' L Application has been made before the City Council to allow existing General Commercial t j land to expand from it's original plan of 2 des commercial and 2 sides residential. Toz v s . A _ _ change this to 3 sides commercial if the last side was to become "multi-family housing(apartments)". y a ' This Application does not only apply to the Watkins area along Pacific Hwy. But the y Applicant is proposing this "City Wide". In other words to all of Tigards commercial z r r property that is multi-zoned would fall under this new amendment. s f , y a s j T3 d ti Planning Commission Meetings r~ f 1 s nv'~' t_c Planning Cv n2CGmmendcd ucauaa„_ '•ia vi _ proposal ^t its s hearing of 11,x.,.+~., 20, TutTiTdS510ri rcthuc .g v r^' 1996. Planning staff recommends that the City Council den CPA 95-0002 because all relevant comprehensive plan criteria are not satisfied and staff does not believe the -'t ` proposal is beneficial to the city as a whole. This, Application goes before City Council , Tuesday, August 13, 1996 at 7:30 pm., Please voice your concerns in person or by letter. 1 r If you have any questions I'll do my best to answer them. Your neighbor, csa~ t Tatum Gustin 10670 SW Derry Dell Ct r> f t era k Tigard, Or 97223 b c 639-2027 ]]1 r Tf lcyl s - ~ ~ ~ 4 _ ' q 1* E'if J ~j .lh YuSfix 31 77,77 7, PM F 7 rF x. r', y - r~ - y N _ - l s x _ x 5 •1"- rt r - i - - t t m ~ 2 fii ?'t_ a C t f - r y ` x NOEL RIVES LLP _ Mr, Ray Valone April 22, 1996 Page 2 tTy 5 { designated on the TCP map for commercial or industrial use, it may not be converted to > those uses if it encroaches into a residential area. The proposed TCP text amendment satisfies this policy because it would ® r not allow new commercial or industrial development from encroaching into a residential area a before that land has been designated for a commercial or industrial use. The proposed - } TCP text amendment does not change the requirement that a quasi-judicial TCP map ; ' z s _ and zoning map amendment, with notice to adjacent property owners, must be # - n a approved before any land is changed to a commercial or industrial use designation. nlf This policy is satisfied. n Tunnis _ a a.,^yc.1.1: t M "The City shall provide an opportunity for diversity of r ` 4 housing densities and residential types at various prices and x t: to = writ levels." A' KA RESPONSE: The proposed TCP text amendment does not violate this { € rR' ' rI ` policy. The policy is legislative direction requiring implementation through various et residential districts. The policy is satisfied by the various residential districts in the Tigard z s YZc, Community Development Code which provide for different types of housing. This policy is satisfied.M~ C. TCP Policy 8.1.1: ~`~a~ to-_ rt "The City shall plan for a safe and efficient street and } roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated y ti k 5 future g, owth and development." Nt ? - , 1 ~ f RESPONSE: The proposed TCP text amendment does not affect traffic MUM' ' levels on the City's street and roadway system. The proposed TCP text amendment changes y one criteria of many that are applicable to any TCP map amendment request. An applicant for a TCP map amendment request to change a specific property to commercial use must still meet this policy by demonstrating that expected trips will not reduce levels of service f below minimum acceptable levels. 1 ( - - L , i tat ~ J h? S 2C 4 This policy is satisfied. F 1 PDX1A .9521.1 26322-0001 C _ t 3`- t 4- 7 e ~ I - - - rl f, 3 i F Y 1 4Y F f r ~"i¢- ~ ~ r - zr r 3 t _ . pf 2 - - - - ~ - - - - t z ~ ~ _ _ ~ 53 ,f~e ~:,~.3~ lA { fi g _ - J- 4 t 3 F i a~ x a. ~ ~ ~ ~ F~ ktti ~ "yam,.:-L:.`s.-=,,.~_.w°..'..1+~6:-sn.,u: 3..fe..avr :r..5.ax.vws..m'~ - ~ ~ ' ~ ~ £ ~ ,~zz Y% - w7^~ - Asa- ~~u~ ~ ~ STOEL RIVES LLP a S - a~i.~Zr fi ~a - } ~v ~ F ~ ~ ~ s "~~'~~1 ` Mr. Ray Valone ~ ' , a M '~K"~ t April 22, 1996 ~ a ' Page 3 t $ ~ .#~r ~rti ] S ? ~ j ~ ~ D. TCP Policv 12.1.1.; 4 ~ . 4 ~ i t 4 i to ~Rk "The Cit shall rovide For housin densities in accordance ` a ~ 4 with: ~ -mot ~ ~ t x - r4- t 1 s - - ~ a) applicable plan policies; 4 ~ b) applicable location criteria; and ~ ..~s;,.~p ~ 3 r ~ , ~ j f c) applicable community development code provisions." ~ s x ~ § ~ r~'i ' ; ~ x RESPONSE: The proposed TCP text amendment does not impair the ~ ~ ~ ra ~ _ City's abilit}= to provide for appropriate housing densities. TCP Policy 12.1.1 is legislative - , ~'_'=-``"'r - direction for im lementation *.hr the va us z di - t;' _ _ p ough rip oning stricts in the Tigazd Community of r't ~ - Development Code to provide for appropriate housing densities consistent with the TCP. ` a~ fr . 1 S:.l Y xw+ r This policy is satisfied. iy- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3~ E. TCP Polic~12.2.1: xs 1~~~ s~y~ ~~`~t"~. ib i3 ~ ~ "The City shall: 4 b r~ a~Y ~ c ~ . >s~~ 3 ~ r= ; a) provide for commercial development based on the type of ~ , ~ ~ ~ , a use, its size and required trade area; $ ~n~,~~~ s b) apply all applicable plan poticies; and ~ c) apply the appropriate locational criteria applicable to the ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ' scale of the ro ect." f r.1;~.3 ~ __1 ' ' ~ r ' RESPONSE: The proposed text amendment satisfies this approval x ~ ~ ~'~~~'~"~=""a ~ ~ criteria in two ways. First, it amends the locational criteria so that an otherwise primarily ,~.g'~a. { land-locked ownership in split zoning (i.e. commercial and residential) can be developed ~ rf r , 8 :rte ~ - consistent with protection to adiacent residential azeas. Secondly, it does not affect the ~ .,=:j ~~`~~h~` ~t ~ ; =s*,~ ~;u _ requirement that a quasi judicial TCP map amendment rnust still comply with all other ~ t ~ F fr ~4 ~ applicable TCP plan policies. ~ U, -I'~~ ~ F ry ~ c. ~ = ' ~ _ - ~ This policy is satisfied. t t ' rtl. ~"GP`^LY` itit 1 k L' .k' ~4 ~C Z- Y ~`~'r y "'r ; , _ ~ set' x k a a xfka lpr J`- x -F ~ _ 1 a.~„ m 5 ' .-x - bT a S f t - -Y ~ .5, ~ PDXIA-29524.1 26)22-0OOI ~ - - 1+" 4 t _ mow„ s S~ x ~ r s 1 ~~rt e~ .e.~-z"- ~n r ~ x 'o- ~a i " xFy~' a - ~2 r - tom'- ^~~'na r-Y:M '^xd"~:y.t~,ea t !'r £ = t gy q i - ~ t, P r d - _ ~ L 'i~~r k 4 - 4 T ~ f) R .E 3' ~ ' F } ~J "`r } zv.+. - - ,t Y ~ ~ ~ 4 'rya ~~t 5 r ` ~ 3- t ~ s - - 4 4 9 rt+s~ ~ yr" y z y' _ - - _ } ~~~t- ~ Z3 ~ k ~ y k r t ~1G~ ~`d' ~ _ _ 7 G - „r - ..~'s.--~.s~'~ _ .1 ~ > F y } ~ _ fir". ~LL ~ ~ ~~.~i v_ ~ F ~ , - - . ; - 0 1 ? -Nr „,s - aswra.r...s. ..e~.y. ,..1.v.~...~.,~..,,.,.3a>.. J.1<.,..- .r......._. , .-.<,.,z._+..-,:f- ..,..vrb G..mLa .W._._ - „ _-..-,.....w...av+..__--c..nca. r J . t 3 , I - ~ T F Y F - STOEL RIVES LLP t 4 a a' # ,,t Mr. Ray Valone r i , April 22, 1996 i . Page 4 - ' 2. Questions raised at the April 8, 1946 Tigard Planning Commission 4 Meetlne ' A. The proposed amendment is a legislative amendment to the text of F the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. The amendment does not change the land use designation J -''-l or zoning for anv piece of pronerty in Tigard. Even if this proposed text amendment is * z approved, all of the other applicable approval criteria in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and - ' Tigard Community Development Codes will continue to apply to any request to change the 1 land use designation for a particular piece of property. A separate application is required to - t initiate such as change. ¢ I B. Proposed text amendment alternative No. 1 maintains the - 1 a - k- ` - i q a a - a.` - requirement that new commercial areas not be surrounded by residential districts on more ~x than two sides. The atr'rd_tnenr would nitow an existing commercial area to be ;.,cTeased L, ; 5~ size and not be subject to the no more than two side requirement if the three proposed ' criteria are satisfied. ~ . C. The proposed text amendment provides protection against -.,v, $ ~ , ~ r b x inappropriate commercial zone changes because the proponent of such a change must meet - u ~ , the three criteria found in alternative amendment No. 1. ~ The proposed text amendment establishes specific criteria for such a change whereas `r ~ - the current language contains no criteria. TCP Policy Area 12, "Locational Criteria s g f Introduction" provides: i - E "It is intended that these locational criteria be construed in a flexible manner, in the interest of accommodating proposals which, though a ~`AM - i not strictly in conformance with the applicable criteria, are found to '3 ; be in the public interest and capable of harmonious integration into x " ' ~ -1,1 1, I ~ ti the community. k , ,~f~ r TCP II-77 ° y. x x The Tigard Community Development staff has taken the position that the current F language would allow an expansion of an existing commercial area or establishment of a z s' . new commercial area, assuming other approval criteria are satisfied, without meeting the "two side" requirement. The proposed text amendment simply imposes specific approval k ''I I criteria that an application for a comprehensive plan map amendment must meet instead of nJ simply stating, as the TCP now does, that the criteria may be interpreted in a "flexible" manner, without any guidance as to that interpretation. J ' r E , a s f p f, ' x r PDXIA-29525.1 26322-CMI ';bf / f _ s j f s' v ~i _ x ~r {L E - S ~i(J ? A r t _ r `F * r ` + 7 _ . Y I , - 1, I -1: i - I - . . i - ~ - . i ~ , I I I ~ 1 , .1 . . - 'L " " - , , , - , J , , i k - i_- ii T: ' .4.. ~ :T - _ . .z.- ` - , - - - _ u_ tom `..1~.~. ~_z, . . - - - . i. } v ~ OMAN- 'I 7" I - ; ~ , , : . , . . . " . ~ ~1_ , i,r , , e-3`r. k' 4,., I, Vr - , ,-y^x hr k -pi t'a*M s.'um...uuu..s 'X tJ.w.._.,._._.^a. w4az.°u.;...3.3d'3*...Y aaav...ras-.~~a vx%s.Jvfa~.ts........-..-- ____.--„_,..c--a aa...a a.s." *u ~ ~ t' r , _ ~ = STOEL RIVES LLP ' , n" r €>x Mr. Ray Valone April 22, 1996 ,44 11 I ~l ~ t rs~ ' Page 5 r~ii,;I~ 3. Impact of the Amendment., { y tot I have reviewed the land use district map of the City of Tigard. I looked at 4 # ` 3 t d ownerships (based on property lines shown on the map) with "split zoning" (part of the - - ~ ~t' ~ a property in a commercial designation and part in a residential designation). Based on that r s s criteria, it appears that the only property that might be affected by this - ap^li ari n ; the -te,+r y 3" _ - °e e---cted - r"--..o.. - - 5~ k'K property owned by my client. A broader review shows that there are several residentially- f \ .WV .1,.:. p , ' zoned properties along State Highway 99-W that could be affected by this application. K r4tt 4 However, the same application could be made without this text amendment. ffi AJZL~Q _ r Based on this analysis; I propose that Alternative Amendment No, 1 be- revised rn read r i~i r Q ex" r F r as follows: - ,~-11 f y' r a 2 r k as ? a ,Aa- a q 1 _ S j Ill. Snacin- and Location. c (a). Anew commercial area is not surrounded ~ ` ~ - i f a ~`R by residential districts on more than two sides. r z ~ ,'a i , < 'y 1 (b). An existing commercial area may be ; r. ~ Y~, ' , y ~ expanded and is not subject to (1)(a), above, if '~a",r"T NL - the City Council finds that: re fiw - ~aQ 5s z (i). The expanded commercial area 't _LVX N R; r is not surrounded by R-1, R-2, R- + ~ I S r r -~,xf ay r r 3.$, R-4.$, Or R-7 districts on 4 -~{-,c'y'st - " more than two sides; I z, € =gi n F~, z I Ii, .1111. I'll ie.?iu„rz«,~r, 'rep ~,r da F :I - K x, _ (11). The increased commercial > ,J " area will not adversely affect the ;°3 N, ~ ' - clirrnunding residential dictrirtq! r 7 t c5f 'a id' - " ~ ~ 2# G 4 , a ~ 4 # k (iii). The size of the increased ~ - F- ~ t t z z $ commercial area will allow an ¢ " , 1. "I N1. ~ - appropriate buffer to be provided V " ~,v between uses allowed in the s commercial district and uses f ~~r I 1- 1, r E " ` allowed in the surrounding Y ' . i v, o- residential district(s); and . i , - ,y_ f - - £ t yam p r F t ~ (iv). The increased commercial r "Y4 azea is the minimum size necessary p ~ i 4, r PD%1A-29524.1 :63:2.0001 kq _ [e G ✓ r e,r-sk'a x..a ~.,.~w+~w.rsw , w 7 3 - s - .~3 x 7`"' - - i Y ?'tom = 3~153 - - T 4 iy, t fi d - - Y +1, - r s y - x q? 1` tea ^ _ ^ - , , Z - , " 12 - ~ - ~ i':.A, ',j' , - f~. _11,11-, i, - - ~ " _ ~ _t" L~ -,T, , . . 'A I .Zl,~ ~ I ~ , r , - , , I a ~ aq S - t3 v'"~ t f' >Sr, ee j 3. - } t z V - 710 " - 1 s f-, -x c 3 t . , P t c a- Qy Lr 1 E. . - 1~ I I ~ , I r Y F ~I I I _ - . - - ~ E t :;,'.--'--`,,-,~',--7-j , s+ _ _ ~ ~ r t i I-~. t r g~ - - ` xf - V-,5FN ~u~! 2 a- w a 2 ,2 m~ . T" ' - "I Rte" .A...= ~ STOEL RIVES LLP t l- x ; s. "T2 Nv~'IR k 'I ¢ ° f : Mr. Ray Valone ~ . a 4 ~ t~ ' - ~ 1, a" ~ April 22, 1996 ~ , li- WZ~ -v i`- a te/ 6,`L „,-,a I ~ e Ai -11 i ~ , Page 6 r fi `z ZC t t r5 xX a ~ that is required to allow the i g KM - appropriate redevelopment of the 2 N t ~ r ' ? -x. existing commercial area." s M~ i c*t t' - - Please let me know if you require further information. I have provided a copy of this r ~ #Y y s - letter to the Citizen Involvement Team facilitators listed on the attached sheet and to Jeffrey Ire F s t _t L. Kleinman. :•z , 1 r n y- 11 4 K Very truly yours, % r 11 '%tr r 5 3 !~/I+,t`WL~,} . 'yn/ J (1 A - a ~ r ` ' Michael C. Robinson h r r MCR:Idh ? , + $ - enclosure ' cc: Mr. Walt Aman (w/o encl.) "q _ .-NOR 4 Ms. Liz Newton (via facsimile) (w/o encl.)„~ M - xy --r ~s-s- ix_ R CIT Facilitators (w/o encl.) ' ''w'~a y `fi ' Mr. Jeffrey L. Kleinman (w/o encl.) ~`x,2 - " , ti k "j n~ ~4r ~-Faax, r N-1 - ;s~~ r&Na~ S - NO a i r § ~ , d s c s= ,t ,S t a 4,,„ 11, p, -51 i r .,s t x.-L,A,, k~`t N 4. 1 4 r SH ..rety. - , ,Ii e t 5 a3 L~ f " ,2 R s> >s'.`•, ~-re v. d p' - i ,t r ta"x -'E . ' c4 q~ P'rtx ; +,3 • Et - c' PDXIA-29524.1 202-1-MI ,V r F _ ' r, 4 I - a A r r - _ ' `l 1x _ 's: - - . R.TM,- en,~ Y"'i v,^...•xa..vsr:+:rszc.s*s*...srxa•.m.g.. o».-.,.-.-. -"°"a '.•mz sa _ xy rS- -,r°.s., #'s'J' -ai k _ r - y r - YX~"~':ry Rt ' >N,""~T--f ~.•y7„, t - - s c - _ r _ ✓ - F r-~v,,, 3-t y~ I r'r~, -3'~"t`'YS~' y, $ 1 - 'f y x _ - }rf>k- Mq4="' P ~,i 'V, # .5z tk z rv r t rr7 s,~.y 4 t,x 4 x +r - 1 t ;r, Y K' r § ts? I . s; ~ o r. ~Z 1 }r } c k s -.-4 r, xs€. r - a y#`'~-~ jv- t`r ant 4i' - - - - - - - - - . - - - - $ _ a 1-1 I ~~,,..i i=. 3`'.a~.3=.a,...,_ - - -LA ' ~arA.^..:w,~-aa::3.'~_.....:,.~L..-'..a .,.!c...>;...._:w.:.-..._w..r..5,....,.:.m-.~..a..::.asSY.:x., "#tsn - r sr I S , x ,r05/08/86 tSED 13.03 FAT 503 220 2480 Sl;oel Rlves 1 0002 ~a tom a ~h 3 ~ ` fi STOEL RIVES LLP ~ ' X : { ` §d °i Yom`-'~ j ^s->a3 y -.Ctzs y g r ..,1 :1 T T f) 0. N l' Y 5 `ks j t, S ~j, aT.\NDARD INSURAIICF CGNTEN _ 71 41 i z Fr -V , - y. •NRI4LY fIhTH AVFNUC, SUITf::d10 ff• 1..v ~s 1 . - •t a? - C(LRTI .(ND, (TRF(it7Pl Yibi•1!etl~ 3 X _ - PI-11 rSrUl::i-3iAn Fnr taJ3t!!v.>i.Yll i J{ "a }'L ~F 1 s''-a.~ >a,r y-r"`'',^: t.nmcr. w..n>a ixmn 5- °z„r~ } .-i-4-r' _ _ e - a-w ° o g - ~r~;•r^' ! - May 8, 1996 r,' s Y _ ~t -t-„ 3 Sx~-='_th- - 7y 4'r IT ~x M[cHwe[ C. ROBINSON s _ C. r - Sad - , - t DlIea Dle! Y y ~1`{Y ^'y 3rs~r '_GY i 2'- sD i r, 1 (SOl):94-oloa a.zn....: Y3..,. c 5 c 's VIA FACSIMILE LS y' - I ;s a Mr. Ray Valone, Planner k,}' z y< ab City of Tigard Corrunt ity Development Department r~ cI 111.11. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. F ` fi Tigard, OR 97223 >atF ill, ~ F kz i 'T. I'll i rv ,.1," - r t Re: Application to Amend Comprehensive Plan Text by AKA Services [WITI~_,'-_' ~ - T Y Dear Ray: r - As promised, this letter analyzes the potential impacts of the text amendments. As you "k K~ know, I modified the text amendment proposal in my April 22, 1996 letter to you. Based `k,r = on that modification, I examined the current city of Tigard zoning district map. I looked for 47 , _ _x r f areas currently zoned CG adjacent to residential zoning districts more intense than the R-7 ~ ' I`'L' ~ £ classification. I excluded some areas that are develo d and rovide no opportunity f Pe P for 'Kj`a t t q obvious commercial redevelopment (such as the CG district surrounding the R-40 district at ' ~ I 1. ` ` Washin n S uaze Mall. ~ 4 ) I found 11 areas located n° flows r ( p '-T s 1. On Scholls Ferry Road west of 112th Street and north of Springwood Drive. 6.`r - T, ~"4 -.z N * e i 11 kr3 2. On Greenberg Road at Shady Lane. i': z~ 32 t # t 3. A small CG area at Oak Street and 87th Avenue. ap-' ~y~~~< y 3 d 1 i , 4. On Pacific Highway east of 79th Avenue. , ! s F 7 ~ `S s-'- t yr --ti x;+ Y 5. At Hall Boulevard and,Pfaffel Street. a~ + r' 4# :Lwt a Ft'~ - 6. North of Pacific Highway and west of 217 to Greenberg Road, h' _ j , M'; ~ s n 9 a c 7. North of Pacific Highway at Johnson Street. ^rlr - a d-- A - ps i ~+PDXIA-31432.1 263ZZ-oral 'z ; fi ' r I t ~ d T£ r ;a _ r Y -a 5- Pnn,.un v>-V--- w. w.... < „ e fr+$3 - t ' 5 n N.Zia -W" »r' V = A'"',R S.: ?Jv Uj. S' _ z 1-0`- r3'` f - S A.~L1is S:,'f..e Wa= ;z* 5,, "K rc.:b'.'." s,,. . -~''I+'i EIS r..r' . t'. :.Z:4'• t K `1`1~ -.1 ~-~Ili-~" - , , - - , _ _ _ - 29 a ~ 4 q y N L L - yrl--yam 3 _ F 7a Yxsk<~ {tc=fig r 3 t , rF . > _ ° _ _ _ x JA zF ° - x - F'a ` t-4 xtn t - - I'M , ,1 isL , v z `s 'l - t - - { rP , ~u - - a K %,17 i ~ I 3 F wi.,..a,R~a.;,.r,3...,....._..t.d . _i-...,,.~.u. , , .,a.._ . tt ;4g y - 06/08/98 SIB 15:01 FtY 56.". .~0 2490 Stoel Rlves 1 0003 k w F - 4%~tk - Y ( '3 TSw,s h lN : i - Y STOEL RIVES «P r k3. k h Y ; R r - r Mr. Ray Valone,a May 8, 1996 + s 'S Page 2 - 5 t - ,E , a t 15 -t 'i - r 8. South of Pacific Highway between McKenzie to north of Hill View Street. L - °k 9. On either side of Pacific Highway south of McDonald Street. r . - 'L., - 10. North of the intersection of Durham Road and Pacific Highway (although this - - z - area is largely developed). F } ! S Y 11. South of the intersection of Pacific Highway and Durham Road (although this r 1 , G t. wx area is also largely developed). fi ~a _ ` ru Based on this analysis, it looks like fewer than half of the CG zones now existing, i _ - , 3 especially along Pacific Highway, would be affected by this application, as modified, since 3 ;3 - - , ~y~ the proposal does not apply to new CG areas and applies only to an expansion of existing a~,' - ~ 4 p b CG areas not surrounded on more than two sides by other than R-7 or less intense zoning t districts. X s ~ : y 7~ - F-I z s yy~~a r v+ I also want to make two other points about this application. First, the text amendment x i % . ; could be modified to provide that it is not subject to flexible interpretation. This issue came ;r + . F up. during my meeting with the south CIT. Secondly, :he text amendment actually duce ,R ; t t 4 as k - the potential impacts since the "flexible interpretation" language would allow any CG r 7 district, including those adjacent on more than two sides to single family districts, to .I :i t expand. This application clarifies when a CG area could expand. - P r Please call me if you have any questions concerning this matter. r*¢ ~m g Very truly yours, Michael C. Robinson r1 _ , C' ~ { , Vkt MCR:Ixh 1 ~ enclosures Z ; , • t cc: (lencls.) Mr. Walt Aman + = i i ! t ,,k j! , C ~ , , " - , , 1, I ~ I I _ s M ~ a ~ ~3 a 4 y 4 t , y - k 1 C s~, i- 4 x L x t x PDXIAJ19aT.1 2EJ2:-0ODl ' . I ' ~;i f I C ~a , ;t n' y ] y 'r ' i z r t _ E _ r b_ ' i ` r 4~1-~, ';~M; ~~,Q*~,,,, - - - , ~ ~ , ~ , - " , , - L ~ , ~ , - - ~ , , ~:T~0, , " 1~ ~ J- -',.~~-!~,X~n-t:"rl,, - - -A L"g -55 ; so- - j - - _ .i ilj+ r'"rx l xJ Cd S r 'i t- k f i j fo ~ r xrj t , MM A 7- - hl f - % fr-- aka -.rr - t z n - j~ ' ks k 3 t, - E °'s_ r-.,.~' `a'._~-k r~+rr r.,...-,...- - i-F•" -rte j ` . 7b - . . . - - w. - - ' ~ 71 IN - } r I - - - - . - - - of - - - - - . Y - 1 - x - v - - - - - - - - - - . r J LYN h ' AL'++ x.~SY,J -s...S.+.w.~...s"".:..cou G.....,._w.s.... •_i. .L", r_._.,_,- <.v-._~ 11 „ _....,....al .6waa.......x..rv:.,.,.e<.....,... _ ,yi _ I _ . i 1 L Y i !-ql _I r~-, rr a CpV 0 ~ p &p I _ I P , 2-1 "E I' I , r J.- t0l r UV: 1 . ~ ! - - ! 1~ 'TT . I - . I --,Z,,,,, i~191 I . , , ,z;-",': . -I- ! r I 1 a.' . r'.*_~, ~ ~ I ,~-•.a I ! 1: i : I-7 ~ ~ , I ,--.-!I _1 ~ .a J~ ~~i L~~T7ri[F 1r~1 Tr - ' I' 7~_• ; -:t v i ` ' Y rt~'~t'-r1+ r - I i rt7 __r1Ti I1._,. 2 - i I ww TIr - I R r p 777 }}e}r h 1 .7 , L .1 :L! . I , , P~~ - . . - - , - F - j [(~ilr~ GYP '^~0~I _am . ; C _~I ~II((~C-'~7( y I/r71,I 1 -1~ ` i_ ~ ,L i;1 ~~'t7-~$: ~o xx~" o `Ul , IJ I!, t . ^J w~£r : •'t:•. I - ^S. t, k I ; -1I L-_.i~l- -A n`'. ~rti.:'` W - ~~,xut,,.Ti, rs s ? p I~i T f. r r ms's`; , - C i i _ - . -Z b `I! _i S.1" { a r- it I' J ( -Yt•~rt r nom-^T,~J • ' ~pyy~i 4~' - _ • ! •'i•1. y u-- LLL I_ ^ - . 1 F 1 A u L -y a~ :r' 'L' 2 I . . . - : ! ~ V, r ! _ ei I} ' tC - -:.a.., 4'✓ -o jy. a r•- v d, e F. "•'i.l y-%; 1T'--t~ k7 r' ` Z;.y__^rt', -[,s ~~~t~_~.1~ ; p[ 1 -'-a .:fit: ~ y' _ _ (i '1".'•'•ri•i=r; t -c L _ _ 1r, ` i F_I ,-^1=^~,ki~o .•.4 r "1?r~^,+' _ r;l• r • - _ c. t` i :tSx ~F.'•ri•-t-u l:l {!:a.~e'.e.+• I~ •t-~=`a, I :,I._;I. - .4 'Ir r i,.._ ,r .,I pp j `'1±.,,:- - ~T r1-I .r u.. 'Y N = ;_.i: -t ioy0. 1, , fi t t ti 1-1 L 6oofdj T sasTK iaoaS O8D2 022 £05 Td3 D0:£T (13A 98/80/50 4r 4, r t a } r .m - !L.__. r r - _ - t _ _ - " - f ;x p F Y - 'a , _ ~ , . _ t ~ _ - ~r _ , .1 I , - , , - A , , i5i i ~ ` ~ N~~ _ , 4 - , , , - L _ ' ~ - ' ~ ~ ~ ~r~,~ , , , - I , , . , ~ ~ . _ - - ~ 11 L , 'r , , _ ~ _ - - ~ ~ I - ~1, "r~- - , ~ _ ~ - -1 ~ - - , ~ :~r~ " ~ ,i-' "I', 11 . i I .1 ~ . r. : , f F` ~O5/oA/98 WED 13:05 FLY 509 220 2580 Sroel Rives 1 QJUO_T 'ie U,,,..e' - _~~'il C}L.i• iRC C,/~• • TIG.LD.~ - f 1 y .i" a• .2-. v ( NICiP CuT:i` - WIT SEIR ~ I r.3 R-5 PD .`r-i-•e- 1R-12 ~3 TWPUTT u--t ?•t. - 5 JUNIOR J 12- cr_ N -4" °daO1^~E' uaLETCN" J - { R-25--- 1 C R ;25 TIGARD NIr. i I I COCK PARK " s L r , I I , , , ~ . U r - x _ ~ _ - r, s _ , I— I I 1-1 w k Sava - a a e ,t 9..s.__ . a... _ _._....A._. _.y x , w tom. i l o- - - - a - - '111 t ~ NI 05/20/96 15:91 $509 220 2480 STOEL RIVES 5 f~o02/008 2 fh ' R,' d'r is 4 wry _ F"A F'' ? k- y~ STOEL RIVES UP i - ? '2 ' _ $r } ' _ ' - r A T T Il R S Ii V S r Y y aat - fi 4 a,.1.V t'. ' ~'sy - t;- '1 +1.\VVAItU I\1L RAU(F, ':'*'I" t Y S s W iWFIFTIIA%r,NLf,A:ITL 2,11M n `5 \ IstRilMU. VILL(i(tl.-Pi-7_Nt ) - - - - F~ Y ~ -z7 1T- r0D'.a,:y2!1•I4- 4 a r + May 20, 1996 f l a _ r t~t~k i t 3 ~3if r MtcttAel C. RnSINSON - r_,tii~ - - Dlrrrt Dld (303) 234-9194 -tk~ y -e ~'L_~_"I 'i~_,'3'Ii] 7`717'M_'~~ - . - .1 - Q 1 - VIA FACSDAILE z - 3 s r (r kx - a City of Tigard Community Development Department i 13125 SW Hall Blvd. M ~ ' Tigard, OR 97223 "Ax 4 it ' - x_ _t4 f' J, i~ 4 _ Z Re: Case FAIe No. CPA 96-0002 t j~ W ~ { Dear RaY A a. M ~ 246' , _ V I am writing to respond to the staff report to the Planning Commission. Please - - distribute this letter to the Planning Commission. s a 1. The location of the apnliran- - nroperty is not relevant to this legislative text - , 6 ~ T amendment. Even if the .City Council ultimately approves this legislative text amendment, %~g~ , + 1 ? a the property owner must still submit a quasi-judicial application that is subject to other " ....V x _ P P x 3 applicable approval criteria, including notice to adjacent property owners. * r y1 2. The proposed text amendment does not apply to establishment of new commercial s \ r § It N a ' 7 i e___.: e..- t «w.....7.ua..,1. iva ' .~.on'u:ierC/oi _--_n--_, t T•a~ ii. Pt -t Yr - a areas, cSiuliauca i3u~c~u"v2 criteria eitcaa wa 1Gcaiivn&a s aavua , 26...., - N-• xj - qtr F Comprehensive Plan (`TCP") trap designations where none currently exist and does not F M1 ` A r> change any TCP map designations., M tu' 1 i r - 3. The proposed text amendment will not make it easier to change TCP map ~ x ,t _ designations from multi-family residential to commercial. An applicant must still submit a y y' T - 14, 3 `„1; ~ ~ e 3 ~ i ' quasi judicial application that is subject to all of the relevant TCP approval criteria. - i i , , r n ' 4. The staff has previously taken the position that the locational standards in TCP ' x r , ~ _ 12.2.1(2)(B) may be interpreted so as not to apply. Staff takes this position based on the; INA~'k k, ~ _ language in the introduction to the locational criteria section which provides as follows: ~ R,, f ry ~2 x f 1 4 £ q' 'j ' ' XN i w , PDX1A-33492.1 '.6322.0001 ''n 4 ` w_' - - ' - sa1~ 3;-^ asn ~.k.-zr x' mow. h 71 -n < .ea,°rt n ,7 ' " c r. t - C`~ 4 Rry},,EF rrIn _ - ' ) sf! ' k, ;'7"""'~-. 1'4~',"'U~ , E , , ~ , r, ~ , _ r, , I n InI dr - y - C V - r S E + z ~ S 4 1 r to , k t k s `Sy t L - X - - _ _ L d C A T - • , - - 3 _ F } 0- -1-f - - - _ - 4 L et f- T 05/20/88 15:31 $505 220 2980 STOEL R11TS 5 IM 003/008 STOEL RIVES LLP Mr. Ray Valone r May 20. 1996 ' Page 2 - X33 = ` "It is intended that these locational criteria be construed in a flexible manner, in the interest of accommodating proposals x which, though not strictly in conformance with the applicable - 3 criteria, are found to be in the public interest and capable of « ' barmo nious -egr.-Minn into the community." y - w b~~.. tt t For example, this position was adopted by the City Council in Case File No. CPA 95- r _ G11/~IGO1V 95-0^u07. On page > of the City Council's decision, the findings state "The ° - $ ? locational criteria can be construed in a flexible manner in the interest of accommodating ~r which are found to be in the public interest and capable of integration into the MR- !Sl proposals community." The City Council adopted the same position in its decision on Case File No. t CPA 95-0003/ZON 95-0005. See enclosures. £ ~p a The flaw with the current TCP language is that it provides no objective guidance to the ,77 community, the applicant, planning staff or the decision-maker on how to ,-,cake such an v Interpretation. While Tigard citizens believe that the TCP criteria requiring that a f commercial area be not surrounded on more than two sides by residential districts is an absolute criteria in each case, the city's clear position is that that is not the case. Since "flexibly" interpreted to avoid the criteria, this proposal actually locational criteria can be , provides more certainty and protection than does the current TCP text. F~~£4 5. This application has no impact on the city's ability to meet TCP Goal 10, TCP s r s~~ Policy 1.1.1(c), TCP Policy 5.4, or TCP Policy 6.1.1. The ability of the city to provide :.d 1u'te t:vtt5 ub pporrun_ties 1C not affected bV this application because any future T application to amend a TCP map designation requires compliance with this goal and these x 3Y~ 1 ,a policies. tit ~~k f 6. The staff report takes the position that it is inappropriate for the proposed text E amendment to distinguish between single family and multi-family areas. In fact, the TCPr a - already distinguishes between such districts. Virtually the entire length of the T i.P commercial map designations adjacent to State Highway 99E is separated from low density C. residential districts by multi-family residential districts. t Moreover, the locational criteria for medium density residential and medium-high and high density residential districts provide: t s ~ - arm , --r "The following factors will be determinants of the areas designated for [multi-family densities) on the plan map:.. . areas which can be buffered from low density residential 3 , areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low S- ruxlAaaa42.1 2022mm w t A" A- K ,r q 1 T - f ~ }k { .ail it'd F t i v = 41 1 "1- q - f f.{ r kF Tom/ T ~ 4. f ~ it~if ~ l _3i._ k 3x - s I Fi O te¢ r i ~ k -11 3;1'31. -xs - - - - " - - t _ ztdC #r 3 t._ r,~,dc1 fqm - 4+- 1 - s - - -~F t f"F-2- i t~ ..................._....~.,aa ::._,.a_. .x. L...~. _,-~..s.. ss,......y 1:..u «$r.,.. . ..s. '..~.,,..-_....,..,.....e .....~,.d-t.,.k- t c - 05/20/98 15: 32 $SOa 220 2480 STOEL RIVES 5 Q~004/00 ; 17 r U. ;j- . W 1- -5 STOEL RIVES,.,, ~r ,>1 vT Mr. Ray Valone x 1 May 20, 1996 ; 11"'4 I a , Page 3 ~ 11 t a yr~si - tom- s ~ , density residential areas." TCP 12.1.1(2)(A)(6) and TCP t I. «1 ki as. _ ` . 12.1.1(3)(A)(2). v -.'.1t., ,;n , _ ' hi S a x 2 s - Thus, the city already recognizes a distinction between low density and high density f ,4 <4 k I- ~ areas. U a , r w ' E The medium-high and high density residential areas are intended to be within one- E r { q a _ quarter mite of neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers. TCP F} 12.1.1(3)(A)(7). No such specific criterion applies to low density residential districts_ rXr _ 4 E1 - -;4 = , - Finally, legislative text N'VII - proposed amendment simply reflects the status quo. Most, x " xs ' s", x` emu;,7,- ;}'7',~_G ~ if not all, of the areas shown in the attachment to the staff report as potentially affected bye ,f , " F this application are multi-family land use designations. The reason they are affected is ~ ;fix, because the city has used multi-family designations to buffer commercial areas from low , t - dens; j' .residential d657gnan..,,.,. Tb° t• nt Ao'uld amend the proposed text '~=r-7 `t~~3 $ r° ons app.tea f~ amendment by deleting the distinction if the Planning Commission finds that this x~ dMnetion is irrelevant. - - ~ , 4~ ~ ~ 4 ' The applicant would agree with the recommended condition of approval on page 2 of ' k ' ~ the staff report. g O Very truly yours,, r - ,F ' A x* Michael C. Robinson _ . l y 1 MCR:Ixh , I— I Y `j; z 'ti X k t enclosures , , t x } ~n g _ cc: (,'lcuGls.) Mr. nalt AlI1G11 (Vt6 1dGSIrII11C) S^7""'- 4 Y t. t W,{£t 3' S "f -"Y 1 to tc .r'T EEE` ti, c N - { r t , x - z e r t6[ 4 J `P K IV p i s i d_ -L i G 3 - 7 k - ~M F- 7 - - PDXtA-33492.1 2b3:24=1 {t 3 z'~ f - itr?,rr2 i e's~.q•"'. _.,,,.sx.~.~aa.... a ..w.2 _ rt 3-' 'off S` _ - - R L Y Z S S 5 T' ---f - - ; s i { 1x _ ,,Y fojL j~t,17~',~.-~~, ~,,,O,-:,~ t22 . _T`,`,;,-.~'~ , I I ~4V ~YY~~-« 4- rf^-,i` std v --r r' " ~ Viz. as E i. F - .Y .1 1.. 6 _ f _ ~ -,z , , - - ~ - - - - , 3 3 _ M I ~ .V. I ~ ~ ~ I M _i:; : ~ - 1 . T', _ - ~ - ` 11-1 - v _ - - - - - - - f ~w -oi - - T _.k _ . _ y4 YE I d L S 3 ,v.§a.2 S _ ~~x £ c t r _ x il A "L~4 _ 3 - _ a' r - , _ - < - r ~tY3 3 -v a a ?a._. - --....__srtLiw, "1 ,w , r3> x 4 05/20/96 15:32 $503 220 2180 STOEL RIVES 5 I>JJ005/008 j 7 c ~ .r r~4 - t r 1,0 X1-1.-rte' s - - ~e DES{ td,; f. F- 1. ` CIT`( OF T IGARD CITY COUNCIL wr . . ; FINAL ORDER ~ a; QI°i 4~` A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WITH REGARD TO AN r ` F F' 'A - a a r - APPLICATION FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE ~ REQUESTED BY BRIAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. i i it f~-,kr - zr M s k The Tigard City Council reviewed the aoplicaticn below at public hearings on January 23 f < ,P~ 7 and February 13, 1 996. The City Ccunca denies the reeuest based on the facts, findings - _ t and conclusions rated below.=;s a r? r , a.s y",, I. .:er=.-. r=i Inrcrmabcr. , . k_ } - v _ - }t~ ; ,1 } .,.~~r - CASE: Cc.-crahersive Flan encrent CPA. cg ^DQ3 t r ra vi - : __re r'arCe L'ON Sj-'QtJS V x ' c f - 4 ---77,xyS S Y z PEvUEST: Amend t`.e Ccmprehensiva F.a~ nap from 11)edium-Hiaii y y Density Resdential to C-1-7 (General Commercial) and chance { , 4 ,'sa `-ar'r L" ZCninc from R-?J io C-G. _ r, snt ,-'Tb -11 - z 3 =PF_:C,~ ' r `,%j , ?r'ar r ^cr-ent Ccmcaml - ~ r 1^4~ xz` '{,.s- - T 1 hl , P.O. COY -il4 i zk h . r Eeilingham. b'lA 8822. r":HERS: Buren E. Grabhcr^ , 1 i=93- SE- ~K"nd Avenue 1'"t x- ~ - 6 - ~ r 7f r t~ Rpnial:C. OR 97225 y~,,y, - V' ,xs- y~'.r \ , _ } L 'OA T ION: Scuthess: Currier of SIPI Schclls F errv Road Znd SW 1.3.^51351h ~ I'll I ~ yrw t u: Ave!7ue t~AICT kA 1 S1 31AC_, !ct 5000). t fi n 4t } r- yic:riiv - u yTMa 9F1l s --"'t ~'a"'~ h~, i-2 a~-c:BC sii= is a _-sc:a pcr:cn Oi a uarccl iCaz ccriainc .5.1a acres. It -,*,_F-}~- ;~y-, r[ _i Y ' . ii 'rc.c..es the vies' m ccri:ca ; the circa: ira; is Iccated alcrg Sc.,olls Ferry PP--ad i - ~ ~ _ K - ti - r ~l the ,Hier_ectipr ci• SIN 135th :;venue (see mac. _Xhibit A). The properties to t r Q~ Pr J$ - _s x ..e r:Cfir 'c C: ^s5 ScilClls Fe^J Cod are in t a Cis%r CT SeaVenOn and ZCred °-5 ivr , t 41~ r~> ' Tx sncie zaniiv res:derces. Prc:enles to t`a east, scu:h and. west are i1 ;:card and 34'{~ x z kr M4 Y ) - t - sf~., f 1F _ t} g, ,4, i x_-r f e 1 u r tZ r }x~4 K t t .{1t W F rte z, --~`r,,-.u*"Y, _ yAw-#,nn"-x e°' ~.x~zp: ;mot >7.~~~z, i~. >.r;.z,.*. ',u ...;c,.!,» $,,.-~.L: } l ','f- f x' F _ 'Q y z -'"pr'z., sF - - a x- s .r S, t- - 'dr r t 5n r ~fx - - a „t T, is` s t F 4E3~j y _1111---...---rr:---------"' _ Sir i r ` - - } FfJ} - z s z - r'at .c , ~ . ~ , , , ~ . , ~ ; I ~ - ~ " ' - i w 1'i r C - f { i - , , - - M 1-1 , , , . ~ "r, - - ~ ~ ~ ~ . , , ~ , - , : , ~ : , . , . I ~ ~ ~ I J, I L , -r , - W ~s-1~ I ~ ~ I 'r ~ I I ~ . - - ~ ~1, - - ~-~-~a - s - - E } = il I" -I- ,`'•`-,nor"- x'c 57";"J" - r - _ 3~ t _ F _ .a- s z _ - - ~ - ' ~F ` 4 - :a.% A- - t x.- .fir N - - - }A S '4 ~-d .5:tv...su .u..~ Z.. I. -'.e: ,.......___r. ..._w.e LL.L aru ' c - _ - a."y4 _ X008/008 J `,t.e.>-,~---t-., - 05/20/98 15:33 $503 220 2480 STOEL RIVES 5 - V I'll M -V: ~ , s I 4 b Ss4 r S L' - ; ""I4 amend , menU=one change has not been evaluated for a worst case scenario, which _ -N is a scenario where the site is developed with uses that are allowed under C-G 3 .n , Zoning but cenerate more vehicle trips and/or cause greater traffic impact, the ® ,r Wi planning division canner make a finding that Policy c, ; . ;has been satisfied. rR If + . Policy 8.2.2 states that the city shall encourage the use of oubtic trans", by locating land intensive uses in dose proximity to transit ways. This policy is satisfied t - ~ - because locating a retail commercial use at the site would support public transit ; along SW Scholls Ferry Road. Currently, Tri-met offers bus service along this i 4 F . > r } o. Felicy 12.2.1(2) provides the Iccational criteria for designating land as general _ commercial on the plan mao. The rotational criteria can be construed in a flexible I manner in the interest of accommodating proposals which are found to be in the w ~ x public inures, and rpable of ,nt raticn into the cornmunit The burden ofID _ Y - 47 roving ccnfomtarce with the criteria varies with the degrae of change and impact `~'z r proving the ccmmuni, i. i re acoiicaole locational crteria with findings are as ;ollows: I aye } z,,; ~ I > Spacing and Location i , ~ _ j ~ - 4 t=_) Tie commercial area is not surrounded by re_ideniiai e+istricts cn more than - " E r- r_,Z a - r - - .vo sides This criterion is not satisfied because the site is surrounded by `r - -z" residential diStriC:S on four sides. The residential district to the north is In v I' _'r $_4 - the City of EzavEncn and zoned R-5, single family. The districts to :he ~ " L asst. south and '..."5: C..ne Site are in I loaf.; 2nd _oned 'Cr multi-family v~ , - .1 - 11 v7 I- i rESident al. tz t ~ # f i s ask h r t _ .SI '6' .1t .~CCe SS L } '`.}s>"S3A°dv.,+.y'*M? r4C ' I S' ' i. 5 -~.ia' EEE r 'ie cros=sad ar==_ cr axcpancicn of an eYistira Brea shall rot create traffic ° r t ~ ' r c"ncesticn cr a 'r_=T'-5:c safety erobie'- Such a ,'7e ermines'ion shall '-e based R{ {F 5 { " cn street capacity. ez:stine and Crc:ec`.ed tra-mc volumes the speed limit. f z Grr 11 number of tumirc r,oyements and the traffic ceneratin0 criaraiteri5:iC5 Oi i i - . a f i the various ~xes of USES. See comments under o" above. , 3 ! DC 3 i'^e sr= shall have dirsct _c_ass ircm a m, aicr ccilec:er cr ar'erial sire=;. ' I, 11 11-.1 ' y - This CriteriCrl is Saii5il2C because the Sit2 has diCcCi 2CC°SS tC SW ~CCICIIS _ -r-' - t=erry Rcad, _n arterial. r ' E -t r f= _ y i- z r ,s r 'r- i `t' c'; _ciic t-anccor,aticr, shall ce available 'c site or cenerai area. This t § Y I C:.iB:iCn is Sat?SiIE_ ~E_c..SB t h-~ c ^G clCng CV'/ $C.^.CiIS tr $ 3~ t Tiet c rs bus service 7 ~ 1'. '`*''r i ' =err/ Road. j - I " ' r _ . ~ ,4- - } _ - F- qFy ~l - 4t ,'d s 1w y 5... F f Y- +c t ;..sue., aapMifL 1_z / m.S,.fy°. z- y.." p'~~ _ fY A t F t- t _ y~e; Y - ~c- tt - - ,i L p4 ~`!S i L_ _ ;E _ . I ~ . ~ A _rjj~, - , L . , , 4 , 3 f 4 - ( III... S a ,fi S _ _ - - L4` J F"- ' C._ ' -I { - r t 1 > jr F F a - . r ' . ' : I ~ _ M " . , r ~ , r ~ I I . " . ~ ' r, ~ ' M a - --'s'-` ~..-.tee - ~.,I I - _C.'>- - . . 2 _ ..Y - its _ -n-a . - - - - - - - I - , ~ , J ~ , - 1, , , , ~ . ~ - , - i s~kx 1 r 4 ,B k xf s r ~ '.ririav x, --4 '05/20/98 15:39 '8'505 220 2480 STOEL RIVES 5 007/008w r, _ h• iE, h ,,y , CITY OF TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ° ti FINAL ORDER r ,C d 4!~ A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WITH REGARD TO AN R _ r 5 APPLICATION FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 3 4 REQUESTED BY PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS AND PROVIDENCE HEALTH s , , - SYSTEMS. - 1 f ' -r k r- e- 'ai ' F _ The Tigard City Council reviewed the application below at a public hearing on January 23, ~1 1996. The City Council approves the request based on the facts, findings and rE t a F conclusions noted below, A. FACTS , ~x'~, F , r 1, r~Pneral Infonna_tip~r , T 'I- a z r - s x~. r 4 ' , 3 r i.. - .T CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 95-0005 x Zone Change ZON 95-0007 f ` s°~ 4 » ~z r - , k ' } t REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map on Parcels 1 and 3 of E i r g s _ MLP 94-0013 from Commercial Professional to Neighborhood ~ ~ fiy Commercial and change the zoning from C-P to C-N; and S LF amend the Comprehensive Plan map on property at the g L southeast comer of SW Scholl_ Ferry Road and SW North Dakota Street from Neighborhood Commercial to Commercial - ; h Professional and change the zoning from C-N to C-P. ,T, ~-i~~i~.'. APPLICANTS: Pacific Crest Partners Providence Health Systems 7x r 911 Oak Street 4805 NE Glisan Street r I v Hood River, OR 97031 Portland, OR 97213 s r I - r~ _ OWNERS: Same E , § i t ' LOCATION: Southwest and southeast comers of SW Scholls Ferry Road c ' r and SW North Dakota Street s b rf .r,Lt f r n r .r A - - aa 3' _ { - _ - d4 - j' 1 - y- } _ - The proposal is a joint appligtion between Pacific Crest Partners and Providence V", . T ~ - Health Systems. Two sites are involved in the plan amendmentlzone change. + 4 s { h - - h r5!. i - i4 ids r . . 1 -Y- ;I ` " 1 s ~ r, z - ~2 - ,..v,-.,1m --x-,,,",.; _ _ _ _ _ r.-, w. .2' i 2 - - 4 '4 _T 4 , r I ~ 7;r f7 - %C1 .,$L^ F. } rP+E j t ` La - F -9, y 1 A _ _ _ 4 s s^.xa3 a x k t - - ,k E rk '7 a' t~ w k"z n if G _t. a Ji ,d ,t z Et r - - C 3 --r .r f 9Z k - _ Yy { - 4 L ; f _ , ,1- %M , . , , , , , , , , - f aS_.s t • .i. t .s~ y. . ['..rw=l'~.~\-_'3 n'-1.i`..t..~~ke-w'+ .-1-'-., u j..-1'."=.'.PS_"~- ' ......~~.~...+-.fT.... F k l A:n { ~ .r" e.~a"':1.3a...~..~~,_,....._._,..,...~,:.t,,... u.,,... _ . . _ _ X ' _ _ Vii, 05/20/96 15:34 '8'503 220 2480 STOEL RIVES 5 BOOS/008 r r; either by a new zoning district or by land added to the old districts. Fcr the above e reasons, °cl~^ °.t1 i~ satisfied_ L 4 f ! rZ. ' 5. Policy 12.2.1 (1) provides the locational criteria for designating land as neighborhood commercial (C-N). These criteria apply to Site A. The locational criteria can be construed in a flexible manner in the interest of accommodating proposals which are found to be in the public interest and capable of integration into the community. The burden of proving conformance with the criteria varies with the degree of chance and impact on the community. The applicable locational criteria with findings are as follows' - x (1) Snaring and e fa -on a. The service area radius for a neighborhood commercial center shall be at !east one-half of a -iie. i ne service area depends on the type of tenants who locate at the site, but it is expected to be at least one-half mile. if approved, this C-N district would be the only one within one mile. There are a s4 t C-G and C-P districts within one half mile that serve a larger trade area. ' b. Commercial development shall be limited to one guadrant of a street intersection or where there is no street intersection. to one side of the y street. If this proposal is approved and Site B is designated as C-P, then 4y r = Site A would be the only quadrant of the intersection designated as C-N. The northeast quadrant in Beaverton is designated as O-C (Office Commercial); the northwest quadrant in Beaverton is R-7 (Single-Family' Residential); and the southeast quadrant would be C -P (Commercial Professional). This criterion, therefore, is satisfied. f (2) Access a. The proposed center or expansion of an existing center shall npt create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. Such a determination-shall-be based on street capacity. existing and 12roiected traffic volumes. the spwd limit, number of turning movements and the traffic generating characteristics of she most intensive use allowed in the zone. As discussed above under 8.1.1, staff agrees that the traffic analysis completed for the previous comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment (CPA 95-0002/ZON 95- 3 s 0003) suffices for the current proposal. Based on this analysis and for the reasons cited in 8.1.1, staff concludes that redesignating Parcels 1 and 3 of q Site A to C-N will not create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. This criterion, therefore, is satisfied. F 9 - - - iK h r t 1 t i t 1 7 F s i{ r r _ ti z r ggr p X -SM gy {as,Y ,~h'R L;s SJ .h Y. ~ Y `~*.d..^IS:Y ;F _ . - - ~ $ a4 q.~ T 2~' -.y, i ~.,~~+4ivx ' ..._....e....~.wiev«.:.m-+.s.+.zss4dF w~.>aar..m..... ~ws"nL.,2w.~.,n«s.<.g ,.~.._.._.~-~,.arss+.<seie...~...-a`a=aJ»~'c -n - _ S _ Sid q \ 05/08/96 WED 13,03 FAX 503 220 2490 Sroel Rives 1 STOEL RIVES 1.1.1 ms`s , e> y .4 a T T D R N it Y S z FITNAYCNI'CSUITE_ik} 'i: ~3 y - - MRTI .W D.ORF•l-./xN Y~i•I:etl _ - h, ~ -5; •..wsr9U1::42i+G1 Fux liJ.il :'vNau ~ ~~3.. Je< ('sue _ -x g- IDUrvl,ll::t•HNS (C 'C - r, c 4~ xl"5 _ Innmtt:www.yox9wWn ~1,~ ~ ~ ~a'# ff - May 8, 1996 4- ~Z &IT ' r MICHAFi C. ROB1Nsoq -F }SA Dieter Dki a vz _ °a t OW)294-919 VIA FACSUWME # r Mr. Ray Valone, Planner k ti ' City of Tigard CotnmuilitY Development Department cW -all n._ vTT au Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 a~ ~ I x Re: Application to Amend Comprehensive Plan Text b AKA Services ` t f a 1 Dear Ray: As promised, this letter analyzes the potential impacts of the text amendments. As you t _ know, I modified the text amendment proposal in my April 22, 1996 letter to you. Based . on that modification, I examined the current city of Tigard zoning district map. I looked for areas currently zoned CG adjacent to residential zoning districts more intense than the R-7 r x ~F a f fi'` , classification. I excluded some areas that are developed and provide no opportunity for u obvious commercial redevelopment (such as the CG district surrounding the R-40 district at { Washington Square Mall). I found it areas located as follows: t~~ i - 1. On Scholls Ferry Road west of 112th Street and north of Springwood Drive. ~ $ { ~ ~ - P # x 4 1' 2. On Greenburg Road at Shady Lane. a qSE - , S 3. A small CG area at Oak Street and 87th Avenue. j w i r l ,aV i 4. On Pacific Highway east of 79th Avenue. e 5. At Hall Boulevard and.Pfaffcl Street.K a_ k L • h Q - 6. North of Pacific Highway and west of 217 to Greenburg Road, s 7. North of Pacific Highway at Johnson Street, i. ' pa l+ t ?s^ PDXIA-31912.1 24?22.ODOI ' . ~ Fµ- x~ ~ } '41 ~T S m• a.. wa w„ r w. ` { ! d ~ ~P ~ 7fic 4 '.1.x'9-d 3'fi °r 1 r tY F P ti a c zg m. ps " r ~s - a .e~~•s . r u..a _ ..emu ~ ~uYz, i „L.~~..,..'! 3 _-1 i 1 r~..S ~..c -7 -7 , 74 =W1 1, NI €s 4 '7 i~ ggv 6@ 05/08/96 WED 13.04 F.U 503 2220 2180 Sroel Rives 1 1~J003 ~ ¢ ~-M, z, STOEL RIVES ,L ' ti y ~~f { Mr. Ray Valonc r " May 8, 1996 „ r Page 2 South of Pacific Highway between McKenzie to north of Hill View Street. Z F C Y'• 9. On either side of Pacific Highway south of McDonald Street. r r ty', f 10. North of the intersection of Durham Road and Pacific Highway (although this - area is largely developed). x7, `ry f^t.__- j-1 11. South of the intersection of Pacific Highway and Durham Road {although this}-`` # t 3 { k A area is also largely developed). r -V i n Based on this analysis, it looks like fewer than half of the CG zones now existing, t~ Q- especially along Pacific Highway, would be affected by this application, as modified, since the proposal does not apply to new CO areas and applies only to an expansion of existing f z~ v e t r CG areas not surrounded on more than two sides by other than R-7 or less intense zoning Y ' districts. -21 zi7~Z r I also want to make two other points about this application. First, the text amendment t - L - Nr 3 w k „ t t could be modified to provide that it is not subject to flexible interpretation. This issue came D up. during my meeting with the south CIT. Secondly, the text amendment actually duce. ti n* ' i ME- }tY k the potential impacts since the "flexible interpretation" language would allow any CG ` k district', including those adjacent on more than two sides to single family districts, to t i expand. This application clarifies when a CG area could expand. _p # ~<r~ Please call me if you have any questions concerning this matter. ' Very truly yours. M r* } r~ [ s` r "r_i Mi..h~el .r.. ii L• </.u~ 5 ' ' - ' tg L k d, KS iG ~ MCR:Ixh r enclosures r cc: Wencls.) Mr. Walt R r AII7an ~ r' u d E 8 '_...G.. a c r 7, i7- } g r a r 76 PDXL4.319e2.1 2=-=001 T S- -f 5 v 3 4r t~ - y t~ ' f F r" ° -r-~ ' - r 5E # I P ~ S *a'y h k t,~ a _ k -G a f •r 1, {r 3L 3 _ 2 v +n.~. - - rte' +r'-~ - ' ..L~'•l~.^x"',,.'{ ..~_r..~ / ' r ~ .r '~.i Si'~ ~ •:~-i~ i.I,„~ ~ :r't A , t--'• f E , _'t ' A~:i +:1 ~4. G " C _ '<k: ~ .•,2ya.:, ,.Tr - Nit § . "MAW 1 A-0- h.. 4eM S 7 ~ ~e• "rr., 4 ~~c+J ~r pp , nm 1~ to i o r - w 7 j r~ r - I - : L-L ~ r r+ .a`!',.,: ~e,twkof tI' ;i.~.~I~G :'y • =,.a.. ~ ..1 •i :1.••'.1'' f~ ~I •.r .1-.~~ 'i.., 1 I_-i I-}I :.ta'•:4_:" c I'~i Au " ~ •ti e-f; ``'b:. •k I~~( I ,.,r g_ ~:f~j,-; f,;;.i,i~r•}'" o7iis't^.;rf 4 :a W I ~J I L'I • F _ I ~ { i'a 1.[ ~:i q ~k• 1' y{~--•. ~ ~••r t r t _ i [~~'L'.-'~,'~q' ~ t r o ~ . t f }I•?(~\:~i r'j' _ _ .1 '+"`.5 .1 4~~':• _.f iiC}.~ .1~ lll, rialr, - .:'I . ~jf v n~. 1 k y' 1- ea _ lu • u ' !=•t ~~►R , ~w'{i I • ! G•1,:7 L~rr;-o- - I_ . r . Gr'a~j ~II ~ !i .LU. `~t'',';1 .M•' I ~!::S i.: -t• t S ~ o - r .I I~-I_'. l I I I S_., ,t; l'.i: •~y}:, ia. gF i- o-o s, tl •i-l 1~~=., ~tiL_'=" _ _~a _ I ~F - rt :4 • :i~-a S >•j'.: II --1 ~ 1 - m 'v' I ~ I '1= +r1_; 1_ 'i i,•z.YI_ ,~il: n•'; , 1 rl p_ -r - - CI-' ~ ~~?T ; ~r ~ y - ' ~'i ~,•,i:+~' _ " ! I YI(1 r ~ e _ ;ir:r• - _ t •~l •1 ~I'a-ll~l:' I r - I _ ` 1 6'' ~ 1 IFt : j ri• Ai~.J'7:''. rl» _ - t 1111) 1. k t ' 1 tll r ~Ip I , t e r,(y`' b~:1 i ai; i ; _ LU,,, , I~ _.L- f ill -a Zip" ~yy lr. F ~ Il i.rlll l' 1 I.rf~• `.1 yl I - t 21 i~~ - j ~ U -i{- 1 dot f" '1.11 .1 1• , C' r~~`r~14.~1G - t`~I _ ~ •Irl;,~(t-'~I ; iI jl y~ ~;;,.:Ihl~bti.~~ll f ~.I' w - ~ ~ii'.~wa!!,.~ ~ wr,l' s.i. ill _ti. 'j• n - - - Pt3t1F}:...4:~:~t._ f,tt ~r .s 1,, ri,•.ti 'fi't;}'~u?r '71 'tl If j iti~~ j ~ _ .i~L_.Ft1 'r 76d) f I _i'':ti:i•:h~Li•jY ►1! 3 :f~1~illilEtall~Lnlil.llS r..e r "t` y~ •t•iif,.I !~-.7 n c m r "rip 1 r,:rj Em - (7.II7.1tLl! I LirL= - f '~~t ~ 3rr Iij' ~''r. fy,~-- I ~ - - i _i _ [~7¢1I~F[ rtt~~ ~r~t I(1C-1rII *~~'{~'~~r~I(-'" Q$~ I I' ,yT ~ ~I ~ I - - - 1:1.- r J f,~ ; ~l r?e' I I k,'... - 1 I ' - . l1 - 1 ~•h: M. _1 I.1 ~Lllt".1.1 L~ I( - l_L `I-J ' :`t i ,GII Ir 1 . -ji I-~A_""M ~l ar.- i 1(~ r P, ell»r7~ - •'~I pr - rrJ ad L1~.i ~j V-0 -I ! ~f1 i7 }L~I'jS6Iti 1/-~~ _ tC41~. if gll3W37 itl t tY , _I~ i~:~llJ~:il • T nonmuns,n7 ~ = 1~;~. ~ I- '-'!'i.rp tlr~•yl~:••-.-.~-_iil~~i~,-I~ k ~ • rl J III 110S..- .t I ."1 . : •i~ ,y a - f. 'EZ 71019 ttSta 1 I µi_q r ~1 C ~ Pl'1 • d-~ ~LLill7 Lll1_.~L ~lA- ~ r1 . :u [ r Ji w~ f - IJ - - _ I . I 1 --1• t ^tyl~rr t.'~G~.'i~ • .,<=-I , ~'r1I:~~ 7-'~l.~i.; ~ (~':7'~,~ (~-I ~ n f I~ (I j r •':rr-'•' ;:r.; ~ - a 1 1 `~1 i.. j~ f .i ' ~ - Cj]"'. ~ I. I -I ~4- I .i7a?•~: o i~I:I;'i il~-,---•r""';J4•,~..._~I''i .'I .'.f• l__._ t I it r(~;''+• ~Tr' •I~ ` - e I Y _.~-._--._..-..~e~r... moo 77 77 r" t - _ r 3 {I t my Von OrmyR AM- w I t k t S ~ ~I :if : ~k 11 f ~ - a I ~ toy. hot 651 964 " ~~-~~.x'u{~+~ li '9' i t',:' .;71 - l <z'.'i ~x d° s'~ fK .i'. . y.,r ~I ~ i. r d x,i j• r r'~ d -<k r~ r 1 { ~ ~ f'~ ~ t,-. ,,t•~l °~i ~ r r,q. ,'1 ~ yr { llt r t 1 ~ I,S. r Lt~ r 1JH; r, ~ x. 4'd., 1 il• -1.v'. ~ .n' ~ ~ i S: j yo-. i t' ~v f,. i+ I( ri~i' r.-, Lh_:`,. j''~n 1 t r ~ }'3 ;;i. i r 1n i p.~~'r ,y2, r + ;~'i' Ln i. .+.~:c.,:S:.L.~~.1~t ....7k - ~i:i•..... ~..~~..-:s.....4~.~.,,.af..~+,.,+... .yi.. - i..:..:..-...:~. w ~~~ti ~.4i.. -Y,.~;1) y~~~J - i . f c' a • +i I ' - ~ ; [ • ~ _ 1 ,err, ! , `,y. 'F .,,.....I; i4'~ . - - - . - ~ c • I I ~ I o ~ I - I~III ~J _1 ~i~r) ~ aI1,I.lhl~. ; .I ~I I r 1 (I,J . ~1 I I _ t'ItiJt''~~'„it,+,}} -'J• tr 'i;~4lG€.)lf:~!•I I I w':,rj; l Fu=_J~1 ®..t ~rL! 1~~' 1 F' 11 'ILj,1[ ~ • ~ I . .III ~ r;:~~J-1~ ~ ijNF: 1 f ~I ~ Ltl r;1I n\ na . ~Ik~ - .I JrII[ i ~ .1 , / .1 FI•li!:N ~ r!~)` IuF ~IIIIIIi!.},nt ll~rka,j, rT~$ i ~ ~ J • I ~ • - - I~ mot} I I. ` _P ~a~..1 L l tU • 1~t t , ' ,r► ` d. _ ( _II: ~ Ii• .I~r~~ Q I p,111GITl~tll..,.~r~, I;~ [ - ~ ~~I: I ~;1 r =o~in ,:''-y lllif ' ,?~'i,1•.}il~,~I ~,~-*IFiIUIYJIV • 1 $ w ~ [t• G~: i •1• - ; ' ' Jll L'•~,7 RIHNIRIII; :1 k : ~1' °.1 al >•:•I~. °,'~q, I " , _ C. [ 1 1 1 .1 ~t(I ir. I- 11y-.• ~f, 'i - - ' tii~;♦ ,•tr f~~ ,wl_ k, , r, .r ~I+LIG~•! ~!11~ 1-/II+ !..li':•. daH:,- t.'irt: fjli Wk, ~i Y I/F'1'1yq"ffy~~;, ! I!I: II L II I II j - I a T. '•y4[`t i • i j r'` \ ' ~•5 / F61r JAI, . I ~ . - T r 1 r-~ I It ' rJ~ 1)~- I~I.j I` ~~{•1p; t~l-- - t ~ ` - ~~xl •'4! ' ~.11"~ ~.Il .~lr_~~_. +L~~ ~ 1 -f ,L~° Ir'S f 1'•'-:,N ~ - ~ 1~L`. r ~ ~ ' t 1,40 y~ 4c,~' t4 i~` -11,11{i•. 4 - ~ I 1 I f 1 f y, - - --{-1- (I ' ,r •!•.y. •;~!''~~~~'a'~~~•'•5. ~ j~. _ ( IU + ~[I)'I~Y,7'P'•4t~_, ~ ----f 3 '/1 ,4 v ~ F d ~ ~o w-'! ~i : ~.1:; ~i I: ~IF ~~'~c I r- I~I-~_{II~~1cU _ ~lU(t : `fin ' ;.`~)11 j:%~~i:'il.:«~i:','S,r~.Ii-!t - - - - -y[-' - - ~a , m t ~ .*1~' ~z `t'•1.1; J I I~ f I 1- I' ' _ - 115;.. •i.~'~D I u',.'Ir x•11' 11-t4 _ _ I \ _~~r LL• 11 Z - 11' 1 ~'~;:6%, '~,.v _~~~1l ! g~ ~~l.I,_ 7 , :I ill 1=. - ~•'rr•1~:u~`~r~~ t.; •:1, I ..Qj_ f 1 t ~.IJ _ ' ~ x 111 ~ ~ ~I r'ii a•nr ~ -Lt J ~ S : ~ - v 1 >I:~-I ~r.. 1 - - _ Ill ! 111 ~Ct(i) c.: I~ a ~Ll!`~'r)~~L~I.11-• r ~ " - I tt ~c ! jr„7', ~ _ _11?IE~' 7 ( W n ~trL' IGr I (~(il I i[,r , .j f" i7_ (V Pilm[h ' Y I` II '4 r 1"~ 1 1 - ' ~ It I,1.w l~ ~dA [1 t ~ ^V'• - r . ~ wr\ rr~l ~ I III I'J 1 ' 1 ~ I I- I - 1 Y ` 4 t,• t~ • - - {ice - u _ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - I- o •~~~.r ,.t+', ~1•N, ~1 -NN.. r ,:t_f~' j i l_{'r'- t/,.lM~}' - _ - - ~ ' -q+' I i{I 1.1 1 L ~"'lI' I• • :-F «I~ , i 5 _ ''S `7-t.r:'~ _ _ - - - - - " t-?!,•~ :\II :1 rg ,II III i " Y~Rae~-ir\,~+ _T J l17 0 1555 - ! i t ~ •i F1. 5 S I I:'~ ~ x I''. 1:~L [111[1( [>[l !I ~j 'a (a{` fl'f b Lj I j,r ~i 1+ ~'t~', it d yy Y,~ '7 n { 4', _o ~C1'1 1'll.k,I ! lei. ! _ ~'>d" \ ct:r l o • y111F1i4'1. _._II,. IIJ i',T Jet r.{ t . I !3• 'jl I 41 i lY,'; `'s 4{: i ' t j ! a ; J - ry ~m AREAS 7 - 11 v 9 ~ ' - - r.:. . r^~ , d.+;T,'?"sr: 2tq~r.~.^~-?",S~",.•?"T?^rm~a'e-'.'m":aft"`^~W":s}i~SG~'r.:5e';ii~m•.+: «,r~'°*?'a ~ ~ - ~7 fir' + • r t-- k - „ 'If - - - c, .,py k _ _ - - I q. r ^ ' si~..r r3 - 3- s r - - _ - n - - a - - - a " 3s >yar ' seg. st. - Vt..h-z - -r - " t "a - , w ka T,pa kk+`. w. ~E ✓s . _~.,.,.u.aa.«w~, iy....s....a. ,ru.n..a......- a....,.v,,.as..e.~r~2e»>G:.r_1,..e~'.c~.. k 5 A ;%,Z -\W~,,,'. , Lp;~ 1=~q-",;~~.-,~--,!~"'~.'Z'~~~;~~ a C~ k$ 6ul Q2_,yj 1 cwt, x JEFFREY L. KLEINbiAN w - - ,.'\_t' r , ,ATTORNEY AT LAW 7V rj , t'* r~ L i~ , i-x <:X THE AMBASSADOR VI " - _ "C - } - 4 - - - 1207 S.W. SIXTH AVENUE 9k.--^~~ I` 71, i - 1 PORTLAND, OREGON 07204 -'y ~ a { _ i - TELEPHONE (503) 248.0808 t-+.. - K L FAX (503) 228-1529 x _ 4f r August 13, 1996 t a n -=F I 1. T 9 f 111 - Yis FaR 684-7297 1 : " '7 Tigard City Council t k E i 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ,r I. 1077 ~ Tigard, OR 97223 W ~ I-- I Re: Anneal of AKA Business Services--CPA 96-0002 l y ~ - .c.. - = ..dry ` Dear Ray:~7 s ' F- zz t> F ' I represent Northwest Retail Services, LLC ("Northwest"). ~ rr ' - Nort,':::2st iaa5 - ~ $ Previously submitted comments in this matter, and _ has asked me to reiterate its opposition to the proposed j- ' ' amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan ("TCP"). Northwest ° _ ~ rk fully supports the recommendations which have been placed before Y _ 11 you by staff and by your Planning Commission. Our primary r~ s ti concerns are as follows: ` k s 1. We are concerned about the broad applicability of the y proposed amendment throughout the city. We feel there should be ~a-z,_5 - a detailed analysis of the impact upon the specific properties ~ which might be affected by the proposal. We are also greatl - -r ~ concerned about the "domino effect" the proposed amendment could ~r P have upon the designation of surrounding residential properties. " a, ~r As is stated at page 2 of the original staff report of May 20, x x rr+; 1996, "If zone changes are made to these parcels as a result of-34, this amendment additional > j ,x , parcels could be eligible for rezoning dependi tion." a t --g t f i 4' The same scenario would also apply to many of the other rm w sites around the city to which the amendment could apply. - z is ! a 1 E 4 1-s-f 2. The proposed amendment suggests a discriminatory distinction between single-family and multi-family hot;sina which ` - *x we do not believe the comprehensive plan intended. We also- believe the propose amendment would plainly violate Statewide p r ` Planning Goal 30 (the housing goal) and TCP Policies 6.1.1 F' (housing) and 5.4 (economy). -4 J i t~. si f _ t - 4 r - I A 7 - 1 t? s w { 5 a tk[r g .3 T_ _ y. T2 } S } E- fi - j N 5 r -sv~ - f _ -ta7 _ t x i .t s - -r t c t f * F s Y f 'Gi -P L- 's - i t _ S vr-, ww im~~_ r _ _ r Z f -L r i"r. . r .-.e--.....•.-.-..+..--..-„--...e--.-u.*..-9~'''^i.."""p-.---~~-•k~-•'*^'^`r"`- - - _ 1 - Mo s~,- a WNW, TOO— q "that! 10"My - 3 y p - WOV -ovs? zoo" w'+c„ r ~v t' v is O"i My MON-am ac.wys,r„E's <S ~C -CNI~G[ t 1 \ r Z ~3. wy% Wa Tigard city council > t ads s - August 13, 1996 _ r r fi`=: ,page 2 -f v ,z A ~ s s `S; ~ 3. AKAOs discussions of T•cp policy 1.1_1(c) and Com-mi pity ~ Development Code 18.30.120(B)(1) fail to take into account the community's need for multi-family housing. The "mistake'' set out T~ in the discussion of the latter provision is not the type of r 4F r _ mistake recognized in the law as justifying a comprehensive plan a si r,, 1 amendment. - f Thank you for the opportunity to comment in this matter. Very, ru y yours a f r Kleinman + F < JLK: ay' Original mailed, , S x cc: Northwest Retail Services, LL-c - - Michael c. Robinson, Esq. 4 ~ -'rse~5 A ~ - a ~ s- f',t~ Ste, K*t ~ a r+ ~F t° MAE e F 4 2 Aii Mm~ MVVI X S ay i rr r b is 't'S_ _ - son. 777 xxt~'t ` tea. u' ~ ' A x a { } ~1S *~b~ ltd #A 4 sy < _ _ _ ow, z W' y", n s~'js' t ~4 - F -1 - _ t a t ~ t uC S'~r (F -i'll, TI-1,111.1-111 3 x ✓ Y - -777777,77 3 P~Ji .a i - - ?s op v sy~ v-L a'~° wv,-.t.._.1,S.if.:'2'...,'Y'...7~..,_w..a.-3a..._d~..,.deu........__-,.,_-._._»...e.~,._..._._.....~_ .+.b.....,.._, i - gs ~t fr Mq'YR Awpl% ilZ s~ DEAR CITY COUNCIL: } x.,y 1~ e IT _'n r I AM OPPSED TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 96-0002 PROPOSED BY AKA BUSINESS SERVICES ON FEBRUARY 23, 1996. y w _ T s - $ a NAME Jy21WXE 4 61E <k'Y ADDRESS 5-5 s.!,L). )of axY3n:-:e'Saft'Yi1W CONCERNS: © IVI U cd EL 7 ~ 00 TIKE L /7~/ SH ()LO J u~G-ttJ ~ r ~m F, ~0~ A) (OLI L DUAL F7QUC,4-770,V r~- A7' 1 JC-LVD~~ - x„ Fib/k 'b p- r n t t T - r t rE I AIR E&4 2SL `yr 4 Y 7~ ~tiE ?If~l 3r _ Trl K 5r- 5~ Ek/"D/S~ i' tl ~~/~"/lU • j'.. S y} fgT'~ y~f i £ ~P W b J AN4 - r x ".^s, r..~' S4-A-..,. :sr'r~,^.o-;4--•- { F t 5 `zr 'K 7, 'd < - ~~a,YS•:;~wxi e .aG.4 .t- ~ _.l, _ ~ r ..,IrT,«~,-:~ a F~r.i ~ .J f ~T Ail v<'_S.!'~,"i_TeTLC~3-T~ _ L ~`R- ~:✓I y +5-r-'~^.., _,.,s~_r~ n i 02 t % AJ2 ~~rtt' ~ L~ r ..._...__.v.._.,..e,._m.....,._...~.,_ ....,...~-x. ~..~..,.w.,.v..~...~_a._ «v.,,,~...~-„E.~..:.c2a.a..a~....~-c:.r y- PR -Arx- , NM r tz z-- August 8, 1996 F K LL Dear Neighbors; - - Application has been made before the City Council to allow existing General Coranercial r~ t3 land to expand from it's original plan of 2 sides commercial and 2 sides residential. To change this to 3 sides commercial if the last side was to become "multi-family f r housing(apartments)" * xF = This Application does not only apply to the Watkins area along Pacific Hwy. But the xz ` s " Applicant is proposing this "City Wide". In other words to all ofTigards commercial -z> property that is multi-zoned would fall under this new amendment. : - ti _.T i Planning Commission Meeting' ' y The Planning Commission Recommended denial of the proposal at its hearing of May 20, 1996. Planning staff recommends that the City Council deny CPA 95-0002 because all relevant comprehensive plan criteria are not satisfied and staff does not believe the r+i ; proposal is beneficial to the city as a whole. x ' * This Application goes before City Council, Tuesday, August 13, 1996 at 7:30 pm.~'~iVk F y i- s Please voice your concerns in person or by letter. < r y, ti I C If you have any questions I'll do my best to answer them. f - Your neighbor, =F~~Rr .utr Tammy Gustin Y ° h 10670 SW Derry Dell Ct w s ` Tigard, Or 97223 r y s 639-2027 u } t} Y ; b'S J C+ L -4- y r 7 - f .Ss- r ~ r t q u r,~s 77,777 mz-%, Ar~ Z t+ t t - ; r[ a R J ?qtr -a w. r ARA to Y r-% F not Wkio r i #'vgl {rqW, ~ a'u. waw....•~..~_+...r rca ..L'._vY_'Y:'Ye:v4.s^]rs2Te.daL.ie....ssaaw.n.•v_.vu __~r...,a.........., - - #a ~ i F v:- can, ~,,q~ S S LF h - i ~ a~ s v"Ful But it Y am ph, a i_s DEAR Cl'1`Y COUNCIL: E u, r 3S4 A 3 f-- - _ ` Illttt r J _ I AM OPMED TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 96-0002 lop s £ PROPOSED BY AKA BUSINESS SERVICES ON FEBRUARY 23, 1996. " y r x f r- s _ _ z t T~ a 4 4r NAME-C fuzz= mow? ~ h t > < ` ADDRESS G~&IS GtJ /I~ ZOO f g=z Z I l v /n/ 'I 2 as 3's E Y">*~~'~'}1.'`*k, d;-a ~Z - ~ fi'r' 'R~~,~'•~ AM, +`n ~ ~~.as}.~ CONCERNS: Y' a of x Mg- OMNI 'L~ ~e Tv i GGG C OaNva-A WqQ COW U12 0. ce Se k L S2 ASS S h { s ~e~ tb(h CA w~'t~ (ter e616a~w "NONE - 1. 0ty_Tv r Ur wiloz CN l~ we ~f G~ 2! rat s c rru~ t I Al: 0/1v P)Vo w. NMI 15 a'ra~. -may t { f - L _ 'n'# '4S 7 NEW e 4 ~ St an _ _ 7: S N-~ 1 L '~I i ~3x f ~ EE a~s,ryM' Y ~ t yMk ] ~z 1 Sa ~j _ _ f - (f M f f a e~x P_R ~r •x.. T 4 vwo u "Y@au _ .-rrwA+v~rivra~...i~Y. M,N 4Tk "y ,4 +j 3 S x •h-, 4 R, - - - iz DEAR CITY COUNCIL:" -k Ae a x I AM OPPSED TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 96-0002 PROPOSED BY AKA BUSINESS SERVICES ON FEBRUARY 23, 1996. NAME ~pf FP- r r r ADDRESS uk2 \ J E~ 'gg ~ $ z F CONCERNS: ~iV i C 1l{' c< W CJ}~~ n C L I cC~ x qZ a a~ a lWM , 3 ~ < Uri w e , R 0 UL 4 4. Lk ~4'gn t 1 1 I ~ f- { C 6~l~~k.J tL_j 1 L^1' 4 Rf""° 4 R 4-1 r e -1 V~ z x Y ~f K, t i i - JA's t d H^7777 n 77 ec "7`7 d s k' Y 3 g3~ Y» :a^ m ws m_ a me• 1 rt0 Sgt t a-- ~~vTV xYp Za•f C - - J - - - -_yy',a~ Y ~ f d 'k R* G t d .3 C{ - r A ~ t gyp- ~ ! 1 a ~~L K S ~ - ✓ r~- r r 5ru F } } .7 7 Ell 1i _v r ~~'~rWr-:3'~._._ '~.-„•_-.~^m-^~~i}w~~+ly~.s_._.'].~. W~1~~1 ~ __F - ._.~c_. _ i _..i f ~L ~.^~+a+...~....w rr2. ra ~ _ r s *Sr~..n... ..~....._.~_._...a _ . - a . _ . _ - . ~ Ze 14 _ - z 1 n _a w L Uu re ~p~%o d tv -(,/v Cove lw//Yj* ~G P///L/ alplic 6'a?Wol?, are, fey d =6ic lY1 al? g ~u~f y hr6d /p, du& our Du1n,~, - we- are, F T cti~ ~ c c Vu-,-w la m w~L~d ids J , GJO _ JIUK ' S tat ~d+ gali~ r ~u/ Aue, qw~ { J of a - F J Y .-~.i _ .tea-_.:._ , r _..._i Az 7 kt4 -IM"Am low T, Q as My. n YOM .jFtL~Gy"~.-'~-"$..k:4r:N.FV {~jyh 0% R, Z- 0 jn~ ? - - b 1, MAO` -MINK 01, i~~ ,mac 6 - T ZS" z t ~ DEAR CITY COUNCIL: x~ it' - mm _ I AM OPPSED TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 96-0002 :a T _ _ - 23 106 If -';fa<t; : ~ak PROPOSED BY AKA BUSINESS SERVICES ON FEBRUARY Zak r NAME /q~QJ~ r4itlZ ~QI~QZ~~L F ~~r ~ c f ADDRESS J~L 95r 5/!f 1~err v De/1 C'~ f,, 97 X23 T card OR a Y 5 r y rw .y xt ¢ ~ - ~ ~ 2 a CONCERNS: ~/1ClEQS~d ~rlL~~!C 1129re myse ? - x NMI 4 x v r- !!2 //1 /J1 Orolatr ~Q~CL/ ~ 5~ 2 h moo # "AT gal, ^rn 7 3 P j J'' J _ Wm=wa t ~ q CY 1 ~ ANNE ~ ~ F I NWR v Rims s3 - 5 !7. ,77 7 77,7 v t z rh e -TOW04 Mai low vo 00 Vol T700 NAVIATTA ~WQA.Q, e x MIT ~b At {`y ~ ~ ~ Y - t tr 3 ~ t r r -sm r< o!z 71 z s c Or E. - x t< x 2 - 4 y -fib '+i~VV''-• 3 eT. X h Lf } `e August 8, 1996 Dear Neighbors; c - Application has been made before the City Council to allow existing General Commercial * a land to expand from it's original plan oft sides commercial and 2 sides residential. To rk change this to 3 sides commercial if the last side was to become "multi-family # housing(apartments)" k~ ® _ = 1 r_ F'.. IVY r- This Application does not only apply to the NAVatkins area along Pacific Hwy. But the a ` .,t . F.,. _ Applicant is proposing this "City Wide". In other words to all of Tigards commercial F _ property that is multi-zoned would fall under this new amendment. i w~ y - `4 4 - `a:~ b n Planning Commission Meetings i ¢ - The Planning Commission Recommended denial of the proposal at its hearing of May 20,E 1996. Planning staff recommends that the City Council deny CPA 95-0002 because all u s relevant comprehensive plan criteria are not satisfied and staff does not believe the v; K_. proposal is beneficial to the city as a whole. zE ti - k r , This Application goes before City Council, Tuesday, August 13, 1996 at 7:30 pm. r s - F Please voice your concerns in person or by letter. _-may 5 If you have any questions I'll do my best to answer them. z a a Your neighbor, 2 r Tammy Gustin 10670 SW Derry Dell Ct Tigard, Or 97223 s w $ r - - 639-2027` r } ? - 'z y Cw - 311 1 t~s µ W : ~ ~ tiF s TAi' ~ 4 J S 4A' I s r #t '32 '~.A'' / r h r ; I ( r 4 r - 50 [ x a r r- - I- 1. ? - . , ° t - - }s - - s a - yy - MR ~ V a. 'A "1s - it 'c - _ _ - - s,l,,. ` - I - ~ I *--j! mot : 4 , 10-11 Zt ? '•e t a 4 ' ~ t tt. nr~~~ ra- k s -F 1 I1 t 11 ~ August 12, 1996 i , _'4 a t`, ~ ~ a~ - ° '~-s rr ` tt k - 11 n 1, .t. -3 .r - a+ n,, y 5.- R -'fir x f Councilman Ken Scheckla - - - ~ , N. nz s - ~ City Hall ( a ' € m ~ k { _ " City of Tigard u R 4 t 3 i Tigard, OR ° 3 t "I M, 4 % Lt r ' Dear Sir, 'fir A x _ { - a y.-,>~ a r- : ,fb?' Y, . l Please forgive this poorly addressed letter, but i was without the advance notice - £r nS . . } necessary to research the proper title and address. Please look toward the substance " ` ' t not the form of this communication, knowing that it is offered respectfully. r r V"` ~ , t-w- ~ a { ~ ~ 11 } I am a homeowner on Park Street in Tigard, and only yesterday learned of the City t : r x~,~ .I M ~ IN } p'°'~ Council's plan to vote on a change in zoning, specifically CPA 95-0002. According to ~ A y `4r the information I received, the application would allow developers to meet less , - stringent standards regarding zoning of surrounding property when seeking ~ . q - r ~Ll 3 L ~ ~ - 11 ' 11.1 commercial or high-density zoning for their own properties. Q ~ w $i#_ -1 1. a I urge you and your fellow Councilmen (and women) to deny this change in zoning ` requirements. The City of Tigard government needs to consider the quality of life for ~ r k r its residentiai citizens. ~4~~ 1: a - F -E ,x _ f'~ -a Jn r x - r a Allow me to tell what is important to the average citizen. We don't have enough 3n%- t roads compared to the number of cars, and even though I have been here only a year, ~r r~ g 11 L 3ta„ 4 f I have watched the traffic become more and more strangled. 3 ~ - ; s P Z s We want to be proud of our community, but the businesses on 99W appear to he t r - haphazard. I was ashamed a few months ago to see that our neighborhood had p 1 - ? become the location of a new pawn shop. Was there no other business that would s a _ have been appropriate for the citizens of Tigard? Are there no standards for what - 7 - businesses the City of Tigard will approve? Are the services of this business in the $ ~ y: : best interest of the citizens, and will it help to attract the type of new citizen that will ` , s f , a benrl➢t Tigard in the long run? Are we trying to attract those in the metropolitan # k area that need to sell their personal belongings for cash? Why is a day labor business a3 Y ' ~s is f-' allowed on the Main Street of Tigard? Do we want vagrants to make their home M , rh t r . - x , here? - 'x ; s- a z _ ~ .M _ h_ 4'4x 'f j N Fr P l 1-11 'Fy" }r,J ~ Y f r,}`t"'. ^va r-s - s~,^4 z s t { s` p - - _ c e j $ - try { ,r r h, 8+ f r' r -t4 t ,,2k~'?, - - -r , 7- U . - , ~t_--2-,-.~ J,~-I.r 4,-"-~,,_~-~,,*-~..~:-,'~,,-_-,~,~,,~~, , , ~ " - I ~ ,7 , .pq~'~p , -2 F 'k tJ4 i2 f S 2 .ks x 1 y 41L - k J Z } 1 ' 4 MV a _:.."_."I~~,~,",, --l" - , , - . , ~ ,z-. -s,.'ra e- _ + [ .rte --°r'^- -'°-s ~5 qt r r -e~ p _ , - a F ? f ' I- - . r I t ~,td .._.a ,5•~. ~ sY~ts`''~ tx 3' t'~r~ `a . ~;.F i is r ns',..+.~..-...u,....a.w - ~ ~N~ : - ~ '4 4 I ,a '-f While other suburbs work to make their communities more livable, it sometimes seems that the Tigard city government turns a deaf ear to the traffic and a blind eye y' to our quality of life. r t i 1 I urge the City Council to reject any self-serving "development" changes that will give }-u a small group ofwell-heeled business people more advantages unless it can be shown that the residential portion of our constituency will not suffer. It appears that z CPA 95-0002 is a gift to investors. At the same time, it ignores those of us who f - - { ? - - f* - f-~ would like to continue to live in this communit . I think I can s eak for others when I ~ ~ ~ t fif_ say we would like Tigard to be an attractive, peaceful area that offers a reasonably zt is positive environment for all citizens, not just a few well-connected business people. s - s I ask you and everyone at the city government at what point will development become a afi away to enhance the city of Tigard for everyone instead of merely serving those with a a few dollars but without any concern for the community as a whole. Most respectfully, x Sandra Auld - 1t 1 i 10441 SW Park' ig, i - Tigard, OR 97223a r ti x alr CC: Ray Vafone, "m.,-^°^:ate planer 4~? a MON R RI _ . 4 41 $Q~ C MOO 7 Ye4iy F } " s~~ 4. s,„p'ra:-^ 1 L k,s _ - _ -r sr f Y P - Y w. 4 ~,kY. 1 b-f S' S Y _W Mm~l a4~ r r ~ a S4 5 W v i Y - $ F6 2aK`str_i, Y a k rt #s J } F Y + R Nv.i$ 5'f '1'r - S EMS g"T7q kw won- ME, ~~xn ~..`.~x ~~,s~- Amu ° ~qr z fi Y ~=51D, ~Z°' ayt .,..1 _ +rdn+~vSGfi$7. m5.w.`..`.~. x" w'k ea"ai+u.sa.:~ .:r^'.~wmay','."!~`•'y'.:4ri'3 i - ~y 20, 3 . 57 s ! PCdie'Syin'£sY Y"`t r LQROL a~Tnn -i\RQ[~£z ~~i.4 ~»"`t^`F kc ag# 10655 cSouE6mi SPA .SfR££F ap i a¢c~ lozc on 97223 -c3 t Sc s V c 9 9 ti zs, ~ 53 uF 3 t j / n y ~ 4 ~ rp~;`~l`M I` kyu.~jJ. g. =y' Wz' ~2_7 f`f `'S --w NEW N, 9 7ZZ~ - z ~;,;.rsr.:~~,.: l~H~ ~~k'fiYlne/K OP/J ,~j-e - - _ -.3.+`'y'.'- ; jt! F'-i~''"` ~1 a 1:,:~y°` ~ _ •J.'~i ~23t }~'sb+i- _ - . S, - sa- - I? 0 ff~ '~ftc.X G! l?l <h e//~9>/n t l° Mffi mail }4 ~*r~'^ z z. ~s'/~f G~JI/G!!p ~'~~1~ -G✓/!✓!~ /f'!'IrlfG~ ~~'~~.A.,~~~f~~"~*`~~~~ ~ s._'L f ~ yx a~~T ~507 t E ff gyp" A To, r~ ~~;K _~_X ~ ~ f G ~i`hJG ~/yyi{f1</~fa GII~oL CI~9/~ixtn7j s , c R SUN s,r~. ~7ks z# ~ h/~CS ~/l~✓. f/~iri C'lz`y / UGG~ 3".rc~~~~~~~~ . - ` Y Y ~jl~hllZ li/-c eu r r! a ri t7t, ~1a1`~ k f ✓ ~ii f r ( r - - a ~ / //C? 44~WlL.( IT, n 1 P/ice r~ l7Crc vT` ~ -.^say x ir POOL' r+'Z' l y A v f a_ ~+4C `Yh iy - B: Asm h__ 7° 9/yJllL7N7Ca~. noHLCrr?y c_ . i Y ,yr. zFx> 1f 55 ,t~ c ~e a ' k~r 1 f as N~ x~ s ~+k~, s ~ :dry zri zf a Xvn c yMaynn -wows gap, too 3'' I E _x z f ~t - a d3' j^ t`'~'"~ 3'~rls ~ ~ '',~~..{'."'i!'igtr. f 'S.....- ri, q* _ z r a s" ¢g fi °ao'✓.-lt, `R'_ t - 1 RIM, ~'f x 7y. -k~ s _ K f K L #,.Y+h ~S M` f ar kxiy> USA t5x5,,. A s _ v,p }r.t-~.°'~~a 3t± ~ 1 .5 Tn stsr 9 F zty VITA VIT1115011; L c ^s -•'2xa s_'u ,x. r ^a e i a. f- a -^-s. °s-~,usasa3 an F-i Y , - - - - - _ _ t4 Tigard Dates to remember: Ci of Planning Board May 20 P.m,.Citv Hall also City Half City of Tigard Council. June 25. 7 p.m, final approval. May 12, 1996 Y 71 i~• Dear Neighborhood: Issue: Citywide Comp. Plan change from "2" sides to sides. , s ' As you have•been alerted the City of Tigard is.censidering a change to their zoning y plan that will make it easier to convert residential property into commercial. This city-wide change can have a direct impact on our neighborhood due to the fact that x 0 many homes abut currently zoned commercial property along Pacific Highway. With this proposed change instead of having homes along both sides Park and Watkins it may be possible for commercial uses to be permitted on those streets. Further forcing commercial uses into our residential neighborhood. The City code currently limits the amount of residential land that can be abutting a e~ property for commercial use to two sides, the proposed change will permit commercial projects to be created even if there are residential useSon three sides. If the s change were to occur it would mean that residential properties along Grant, Park, and - Watkins which currently are abutting commercial uses can be more easily converted to a , r commercial use. k While the City may tell you that this is not the case since axe proposed commercial use needs to also abut a major collector or arterial street, which Grant, Park and Watkins ti e not, the fact of the matter is that any of the residential properties could gain - - their access to an arterial or major collector via the existing commercial property : a n and thereby qualify for a zone change. In other words as long as their access is not t. from,Park, Watkins or rant they could still meet the criteria for commercial zoning - even: if they abut these streets. 1 To make sure this proposed change does not threaten our neighborhood it is important that.the proposed change be amended to make it so. h = 1. Commercial zoning can not be applied if the abuting residential zoning is a low or } e medium density residential zone i.e. single family. In other words if two or more sides' s T w ,y a--e low or medium residential then a commercial designation would not be permitted. But if 3 sides are higher density apartments then a commercial designation could be granted.- 2. That commercial zoning can not be granted if the proposed property is accessed = viaa~rimary or secondary)or abating a collector or local street. Charles F. Tigard school is within our residential siting. Walkers to school are mandated by 23J School Dist. 23J if living within 1 mile of Chas. F. Tigard Grade School without bus service. The pilot program by the City of Tigard for speed bumps on Watkins has been helpful and also the walking-bike lane for safety in our immediate neighborhood. Many elderly, some former Council persons, use this area for their physical walking requirements. Watkins residents see the encroaching general commercial affecting the livability of their hares and roadways along Park and Watkins area. Many have planned addi-ions and improvements to their homes and need assurance that thio area will reta--= she neighborhood residential zoning on the existing ordinances of the City of to "2" sides is the current zoning and should be retained, not "3" sides. Yon may write Council or Planning Boar-3s or speak at the meetings under 2 minute agenda. c -j~ Hope all of you living within our area are present for the above City of Tiga-d meetings as we need your support to protect the integrity of this established family neighborhood, , and our real estate valiiess CIT attendance Central has been faulty showing poor attendance even tho staff-speakers-are present to inform you on ongoing city planning. [ The CIT ?rogue reports $27,025 for one year the majority of the costs is attributed rre r to staff time totaling $23,750. Staff has strived to address local issues at these "a meetings so hope you show more interest in this program. CIT Ordinance 93-19 created by the City of Ti State of Oregon Goal 1) Citizen ?anticipation Organization dat . t :TOTE COP° OF THIS ORDINANCE ON BACK SIDE FM YOIIR 12170MATION. lead Bity of gar~ CITMCApE FOR UPDATES, %l'` • T ~ /r /~o ~lr s y'CS.CY.Cno ' r, C~9-dos-~ - .J % s` r i s. - - , , - 'a ,s M zs k ~zz Z, R- d H _ < - - 4~e "r F 5 v } `'~''#3 `s rah 1 - _......=....s._.......__._~a.,.....a,.. ..-'-4----- .ti_ ....o,,.,.rz....sa.:.~u w.,...+.., s......n,.a(.a.2.<cs.: 4 4 yx+M - $ _ i 4 { 3 rX "R_ ` Copy from current City of Tigard Ordinance: CIT's 93-19 establishing CIT Program. IL t z L.C.D.C. Goal ,#1 Requirement 7 ' , ~ v` General Commercial r a General Commercial areas are intended to provide for major retail goods and » services. The uses classified as general commercial may involve drive-in I vi services, large space users, a combination of retail, servicef,wholesale and repai_ serrices or provide services to the traveling public. The uses range i - - ` from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle r 4Y sales, drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments. It is intended that s 1 ```=`°`E'``:`"'' these uses be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street . (note Park St. x.;,';c,;n r T ` is a minor collector? ' ~o r, F a# A. scale ^ s r ' ~l Trade Area =varies. A ~ - , PP{ (2) Site Size. Depends on development. = sr 2 i 414411"', - (3) Gross Leasable Area, varies. . - . s B. Locational Criteria r} rsp,' - - t=.:r - ,Ea3:sC:~mm-vr3.;: 4 (1) Spacing and location + , ,u~~. ~ It (a) The commercial area is not surrounded by residential districts on more than two sides. zzs-`~ s- IL - F z f (2) Access jia r y a w1 . (a) The proposed area or expansion of as existing area shall not create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. Such F a determination shall be based on street capacity, ezisting y:F and projected traffic volumes, the speed limit, number ofs - ' turning movements and the traffic generating characteristics , t- , fi 1.1 s of the various types of uses. - is - is - is is , Y ' , ` (b) The site shall have direct access from a major, collector or ;i - ~ r arterial street. F aY {11 - , -a Pa 5 - _ j { - y dr~ ~f , K i i Traffic impact should be part of this process-also design review J fi' ' Our local roads that will be impacted are Park, Watkins, DerryDell, 110th, , s~,-,-a Y ' ; 1-07th, Cook Lane, Fa=haven Way, Grant, imp thru Gaarde and down to Walnut now L s ,1 a major collector. On-- area has 99W traffic cutting thrn from Watkins a minor collector, Walnut; now a major collector, Safety of pedestrians and school students should F. i fr ,i be a major factor when the City of Tigard reaches traffic proportions to major ~;-'k k collec .ors. "'f -'F 1 FEEC[ 4 i a - l: - {k r ni , r -51 w- t 5 [ T i r _ x ter. -T "'--^-a..,. 'c - .a~z8-' "'X-8., x`"i- E y s v - f --+r - _ a' r- 1 t 1 ,,,r f ""f (j 1 a } ~ f _ - a s cE ~Ik'~,!~, P : i * , j ~ J!3 I -11-11 --,,-J" "`fa 'fi "~4 ' F t ' ~ M - ~ - I , 1, , , , - - - . " k t rj - ' - _ r _ t qtr - Y t o - i - w - 'F s , xF r- Fa, T --'<.-TY! ru+...j 1 _ _ . u ...rs-. ,t__ 1 . y - , c J 3 F3 „v,++i,&T _ F >"+Y~.~'.t MO `3' G - is I ,X- ,ar. kv4 rte-.. `'y''y{" kW 'S. S,{•y 1 Y i y - - 11 Yom , -FM°'f. ,y O,- .x s - _ - - _ $ r"az $'xr hsg s M i t- .G..A:,~.i"..ar»., Awa..mc..- a s " ' x , AM { ss.~.s-"£ F ` 'l k rA ~f l.~L, /k.~✓t..2 ~.J v ~p`^' t ,1~c c1 u n 'x.. 1 t I a ti ec~.tnC~l _ - M - ~f [Lnn%n9 7- C_~ YM.. April 2 ~ x . ° .r l - } a Martha Bishop x - 10590 SW Cook lane n~ati s u r i Tigard, Or. 972'-3 t -'r a£- +169 ER ' A c r Fb~; - - E~ - _r'.-sue ..a 1. 'y' 4 i COnIIC.il : F` t ~ ' a, x ~sy ~`r - ~ ' ~ Planning Commission: _ L y r , : Statewide Bill 100 s e ; s az o{ " When the City of Tigard adopted the City's Plaster/Comprehensive Plan and it's i , ~ x = . . Z- x7- ~ti attending ordinances, it did so with citizen involvement. Any Text Admendments a }~~R _ g to the 8ity's Plan should also be reviewed with involvement of the city's ''ks~ ~ z}- y- citizenry. Therefore it is appropriate and right for the Planning Commission/Council s~ fkZ as atg x z _ 5 to refer this Text 4dmendment to the Clm's for their review and recommendations prior I ,s f4 , l~ f` sue - tz k f , &W to taking any official actions. k tr . a ce: Steve Clarks Tigard Times Publisher . - `ate,, - ~w - 1 r it y1 rte ra hcR' { ~,d% e. ~ ' , r pi 0 hex y F.. 1 4 r "Z '.QP 'n'k F . F j $ z o-av' Y:i} ) x y' s' 1 x1~ 9 3 ' - "z Z F{ - 4 } pt ;xr.7 k, +`s a -z '_C~'` i i~S c .j y s men t ~ t .F, I 5 ~J-1" f1' y it 44 $ 1 E - - - , ~ k. `]Y '`1`-1 r-n~L-°4-.---„r°T4 fi~~ ,V--: !T.,,w.4u e.'""°- Acr*~'-'v"° FJ -r L.. z r~ i ~11 I- ? a; , f r g S M1, tM q~j - a''a P "r,. d a~ x p r 4- '4 h r 2~,,t<2~v ~k n Kati X",~- T~ ; - r1_ rr r n'*qa~,,. k 1 yam' Ux, - r i z" v,y-;. `?r J x *tv ter - e 1, s a tr xa- ,,3ft [~r - L - t 42-N y T A , , , . , - , - - , yk I ~.w 5'~', t,s„ Y yarn - v F -s- .,s w,' rru u' A l a r E ' t,Z x c v E ..nv~r~~.~v~m+ n~.~ t-•?~~•~ .-T^!'~t~.~~-~ ~~~~vrirT.~w~_r..Z.-r~~_~'T~t~~.. j 1. . - - r - - y, b ] . t F - i _ _ ~ M;,in 1 ,z"~~,",~.~,~,7~:-,-,,~,%-F~,."~--~~~ _ ~ - - ~t , ~ - ~ 7 - q' - - - ` _ ? S.-a' - , r - - - M "f - r - - _ ; _~^"v s r' _ _ -.«....W~.s....~u:,....~.t.v-...>...r.....,..+,_....__5..._..z,.....~a.~wu-..=.s.,.. ....».un..~We,. ~c~...wc>'. ..sz. 12 If ~~.IrVr ~gb - . I t ` -3 #e - - ; r i sd "I" - - - - _ Sf, % , 2_, { 1 _ f k S rx ' P'"4 Dew Neighbor. t _ The below le< will lesiti.mic_ t'=--u the =an in_ Co=issicn c_ a_n,i ne 0-,= c•.:r_ent ccQ~Pi " { o , . frotr r___aential to -zengral commercial fro= 2 sides to - sides, Mlic 1411_ `fect par- k ® T ? 3 r 4. Watkins, Cool: Lane, Grantt and Fairhaven roadways allowing general commercial usage of ' - ' t x our cu++xent residentia'_ homes areas. ?lease show ut and speak cr. this .ssue. f4_ :s, x u^.Zoadiae o°` ar::, iiatl:ins is a 24 ho ,.=s noise, liras, sounds 2'_ hours around the clock. f, presenc- sad input bpr-_ E He need your V at this ' , 19°= 7:3C ,m. ?iga=_ Civ=c Ce•^-ter Towr , n r~ t _ L Hall meetin_. Also p c : you calend` the City of ^ie°c Council meetins whereby the:' - too will decide the issue above. If your presence _s not noted nor your lette_s received x by these appointed and elected officials assure you our neigiibor' represen-aticr_ will s :,rear;."- be noted and _eviewe pronely If you fail individually to show :rterest a _°ew neighbors = ^.i':< ' ~c present - nei ^hborhood re^re entation which this issue requires. c`'''' ` ""'a:` :.4?-,Xt: = rr will not DE able _ r s IN - N1, , ` , CIT' c never reviewed this Comprenensive change -nor even were aware of this attic: until now: Ik su?port your nei tborhood issues for u aintaini.-ig residential coning safety measure , ° 7 Fake sure you have a family represen ative to sign up and speal a. the Flan^ nq Cot~issio: 4, meeting and also the following Council I:eeting at "own Hall cif Ea_I filed.-adjacent tok Fr the City of Tigard Libra-=r. We have to depend upon residential homeowner's to individually -,i r s r " participate in this Comprehensive i~:zster Plan chztgz from residential zoning to general k- T. - _ : commercial. Sincerely, Ifi_.rtha Bishop, 10590 SW Cool: Lane Tigards G.. 9722! 639-10:52 CIT „n , _E Central member. 1 ..J _ F S}1$._ 3 l - - s. 'r 1 tV- e M ~ r t hc-'h k~ ' CITY OF TIGARD ' ~v ~,,-~y~ , .I N°z F , ~ t- OREGON ' L r, ,'f 1 6~ a The following will be .considered by the Tigard Planning Commission on ` ' mil 8. 1946, at 7:30 P.M., at the Tigard Civic Center -Town Hall, t N~ k ~~~a' 13125 S. W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard Oregon. Both public oral and written - , testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted; [ r~ in accordance with the rules of Chapter 1832 of the Tigard Municipal ; Code, and rules and proceddres of the Planning Commission. Failure to , raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the t, ,sh ~-r f - hearing on the request or failure to provide statements or evidence y_ -s s, a , sufficient to afford the decisionmaker an opportunity to respond to the , gi issue prior to the close of the hearing on the request, precludes an appeal 1- _ _ ° ?j; ' ' t to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue. Funkier information ~ may be obtained from the Planning Division at 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., V Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639-4171. ° ! PUBLICHEARINGS/P _ p - -I, BORS- L eRS e eND CO <iPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-0002 y x' - ~ T AKA BUSINESS SERVICES ri _ y Amend the text of policy 12 .2.1(2)(1a) of the Comprehensive Plan to ; r x modify the spacing and locational criteria for general commercial land ~ s uses. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A. APPLICABLE REVIEW f "s } CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11 ana L; Tigard ( t T s ` - Comprehensive Plan policies i.l.l(a), 1.1.1(c)• 2.1.1, 5.4, 6.1.1, 8.1.1 and - ` - - - t - i_ . , 12.2.2; Tigard Community Development Code chapter 1830; and Oregon ) 1 . z Administrative Rule Chapter 660, Division 12. v Ids ' Tr8435-Publish March 28, 1996. Cl TS~ ~Y ` , 1- t / L . p i,'~!~~, J", ~ ~ - . -1-f E - r'f-'~' x _ta a v^mav n-+•.'r" f- t t a~'~- ) - 7 t a Jsa y _ - t i',' ti ' 2 +xh -r ' - { - - L 4 f h k _ 5 - - 4 P I _ t C J RX - - t - c 3 .sy - - i p - - - _ o 7 4 fv_w _ i r w _ .xr a c X g 4 4~N rpm! NMI V 211 IRV _ - - > i r T AGENDA ITEM # R FOR AGENDA OF _'1 ~,1' IRCO s a, r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON - COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY' M'" ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE CPA 96-0004170N 96-0003/PD 96-0002 tt ler) i, ~f (Sa x z t fi PREPARED BY: Nadine Smith DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ; X ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL. g § Should the Council adopt the final order and findings to approve a comprehensive plan amendment, rezone and u f ° planned development on the Sattler property. ti,~ STAFF'RECOMMENDATION Ar Y +r b?' - 4c Staff recommends that the findings and final order be adopted. INFORMATION SUMMARY= 3o' vl- r s 4 On July 23, 1996 the City Council directed staff to prepare the final order and findings to approve a ,E4r > t omprehensive plan amendment and rezone for the properties located on Tax Lots 100, 200 and 300, Map 2S1 (01 DA. , r a F S~'`c4 k OTHER AL.TERNAT[VE CONSIDERED t Denial of the request FISCAL NOTES Not applicable. Q~,ff VIE, r ~ ~ - ~ ' - £ dry t r - 7 9 xa 1 - - NM 3=~ Bdryxide`sv AW ~ - k «J..$s 3 "V z rra -_r t r f'' 1 S 14 r 4 -S4: 1`f z Y -om % $°yty~ x3-§t,- t hamr s%pp` •ri "rctrv, -se fl"z 777 7777r- " k`a We y 'g, EL a ~,~t r f r a§ to - - tj Z _0 , , - - - ~ I - - . - - 1, - - , ~ . \ 11 ~ a a- z z - T d i . . d ~ 11 "AV - A",-,W,-;- ~ -f a.u.aa n..,.yi_...° 3r y - x5i= 4 a_,._ v.-A. z s s 11 S r y- k C S-s AGENDA ITEM # /y rM FOR AGENDA OF _~J~,~lam r rt3 - vy - . - k -a X_ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON} F COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY t 1111 - ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE _ CPA 96-0001 (Bledsoel I k i f -a } f -PREPARED BY: Nadine Smith DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ti ISSUE BEFORE THE O 1N I E'-Y-*f„ } 1-1 z s 2~`" > -1t t 1 Should the Council adopt the final resolution to deny a comprehensive plan amendment proposed by Bob , ~y t x f Bledsoe? t p y C f 11 a sK L: dva 3 y a ` A - STAFF RECOMMENDATION k-r-' a~gg F s o r y _ u- Staff recommends that the final resolution for denial be approved by Council= ' , 1 .Z P s k E INFORMATION SUMMARY Tr t t} ~ 2 f ~~..~'Ya -11 . 1, , ` i n July 23, 1996 the City Council directed staff to prepare a resolution to deny a request for a comprehensive plan K Lis + ~ - w A amendment to add a new policy addressing assignment of zoning in low density residential established areas. y - a£~ Vih A ~ ' r h The resolution and final order to support the resolution are attached. fi ~ OTHER ALTERNATIVES ONSID R D m u ' ' s Approval of the request, # ~~Fa ' a~ ` I r' ~R _ l FISCAL. NOTES xE 0 s `R 1% 1 " F t z } Not applicable. 7 ¢ r 4 mF t t tel.( y -,G ~ ! ya - ifi - - 0=)- .lc'.Nm.dOa j ' Jj St.FA' t _ _ m 1, --W S X 5 3 Fs- a 1 - er- # sy Fi i I'~,# - '.H A'~3' y - ` -'q - - i 4 K ,K - r xifs r' ,_-Z111-`y,% _ a c - - - sY _ ~F£~ . y x nV~ & i 4 r'k - -r ~a*-°'s` Z - ,f++.w.r "s- c„~s', = .;r.> :X -w rx 2T^"` r'; ~'F -s'~` y+- _i is - ~t Y L5~ y $ - - I - t. F iY r r n -K.i...,, t°'xf a - y _ h ,..s fly. T~ Y fi 6 n 9 C 1 J ~I S 4 _ L 1 r r1- `.5'" . rte -,.t , J tfit` r ~ .~_,,il'm- ,,R,_ - F Y *k tLa - , °yh`-a°jxFi S,,k.- 'gym ae~s w+>3ssfi,~4'J+e...n,..,e .s....: I. a._ .......,.f._ .v_.. L...^. _..~s...z........."" f ~"~sA 'Sh Z ~ - k ftl4 , k,, 4 4 f I '12 R, 3 * AGENDA ITEM # ; l ~ * For Agenda of August 13. 1996 ; x CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON - n I lLlnll An=Kl- ITC\I 01111\1A OV n~:.,..,wW. ✓ I ~ :-I ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Use of proceeds from sale of Chamber Building j r , t - -f ~L I 4M ' PREPARED BY: Wayne DEPT HEAD OK r CITY ADMIN OK Iti 1 1. I - z - y_ - _ - I ~,s ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL t r t F ,~-j Shall the City Cuuncil approve the use of the proceeds from the sale of the Chamber building on Main a - Z t street for the currently planned Police expansion and remodel. ' . - ' , r ,t-+"~1- 4Y - - I - STAFF RECOMMENDATION - ' Staff recommends approval of the use of the proceeds for the Police expansion and remodel. 4 5 F J ~t t- _ S f f rr'*'. d Yya r yz,~c.5 ' - INFORMATION SUMMARY r. l - il- . s ~ - The sale of the surplus property on Main street known as the Chamber building closed on December 30, k 3 1994. The proceeds from the sale amounted to $92,352.07 and were deposited in the general fund. In V r 4 20 t y 7 ovember 1995 the proceeds were transferred to the newly created facilities fund. n >4 During the 1996/97 budget process, the balance in the facilities fund, which included contributions from r Wit` f w z the general fund and the Chamber proceeds, were appropriated for expenditure on the proposed Police r» 1 f expansion project. , . ~ - £ t - b " ~ f - -,A It was later noted that the Council had originally directed that the proceeds from the Chamber sale would 'm not be spent until the Council had made the decision and voted on the proposed expenditure. ; N P I The attached resolution directs that the Chamber sale proceeds be spent on the Police expansion ~~T~1 consistent with the 1996/97 adopted budget. { z,~g ` t r k OTHER ALTERNATii1ES CONSIDERED yl , Approve expenditure of Chamber proceeds for a different purpose. ` ; - _ A ~s t -Y-~ FISCAL NOTES i 1)The proceeds with interest amount to nearly $100,000 and are currently included in the facilities fund to t - r ~ be used for the Police expansion. A change in the purpose of the funds will require either the delay of the t Police project or the contribution of an additional amount to the facilities fund from the general fund. Y ' 4' M> - WW f r 1, H ! fx cj-- r i, b z S - y '.t - , 1, ^fe t x ; .+r s k G - _ t N - - t ; 1. £ - " ~ ~ r, ~:'_-~,,g~i~, " ,~r rc _ 3, `5R 1 F y E} i F P s _ :rte' 3t r Y y - 5 F y'- ~C - 14 mod' -,r-k 1}..~q _ -.r ; P Y- -f _ 3 -Y .H Y k„ - ( - St' - - K - o.f.~ -J, ,r'„ ; Z' ~a z r 5 r t I eL _ Z£ . , ,1,- _ - v~ T L 'ski' Ty #rut €.s„~. Asa.. .c«.xv~.,~„a.:.a... m,..a.....>,._v. ..w._~.~..,..._.,.. ~d,a._r max, _....,K..._..a... Y 5 ~Yy, - s✓g - i - ~ _ of /LION AGENDA ITEM # For Agenda of Aucrust 13. 1996 - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 4 COUNCIL AGENDA 1T-EA SIT ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Aonroval of bid for Cook Park Gray Water Line Phase Two PREPARED BY: John Roy DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK 7 j ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL The issue before the Council is approval of the City's portion of the bid r r p.. submitted for the Recycled Wastewater Project which will provide recycled ar,ry.* wastewater for irrigation purposes at Cook Park. h r >Y? a t - - STAFF RECOMMENDATION--- The staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board approve the bid as s submitted. s U -4 ` INFORMATION SUMMARY - r~ On July 11, 1995, the Local Contract Review Board entered into an agreement, £tz r}y Cth Unified Sewerage Agency to participate in a Recycled Wastewater Pro7ject. c s- ~ s~ a i e project would provide recycled wastewater for irrigation purposes at Cook x Park from May 1 to October 30 of each year. The cost of the water will be t the actual cost of producing and delivering the water as determined in ~EF January of each year. Current cost is $.06 per ccf. E's' x z~S1 The duration of this agreement is 50 r 3~ years beginning May 1, 1997. h r - z x- fir"" This covers only phase two of the project and does not provide gray water "sr k service into Cook Park proper. It is anticipated that the Cook Park expansion project which is under development will include the necessary z 2r.~ *-'~z pipelines required to provide service into the existing area of Cook Park. s~ OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ( 3~ 4 F Irrigate Cook Park with potable water at a cost of $.63 per ccf. h, t+ ; k s 3 z FISCAL NOTES The total bid amount submitted for this project is $430,268, of which the city's contribution is $88,971. The City's portion exceeds the budget by F y $971 i Y The funding source for this project is the Capital Improvement Fund FY 96/97. r 3 y~ _ r a ~ 0 3 w _ -2";a' - rY.e;ir2';s'n . (F6Y1 k4` } A~ - x r i f < r + a s L _ ..5_~e. .iti _(i~-: r.~ ~ .Y_ .~r.._ ~ t~ _ _ .._s-SC c .v ...i,...~. .._,=ice ~ _~v C ~ z 7 k rR 0 T UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY Date: To: 4 C. \ F/axx Number. e g From: ` Phone Number. TX- tr Y-1 C&rL"'"k%vlL Fax Number: 44 A w . 503 640-3525 5i W We am s®nAin$ m tntnl ni 3 rwcsa~ inr~~u0inn thla rruc-hm* ` - Comments: K r p t aiA i r- Qo It, ~ 1 "t 1 9 N k ~ 7 2 L ~ fit n..y.. o•+~+°'~°odirx~+ ~I^~.".:vse''"iiwa 4'k'°:.+.i~i'a,~w~y^ ~ 1 J} f a~e~i'T O'x• _ G4 z ° F rte. - 7-a- -`lf -'x iv T.. 6 ? e •3' t tI k } err - - - L + - . Li Lf - 1 5 2 a - , h 6tv b.. iS • l w~'',f aMYi 7 € tv, n.¢.r ,yr r. -7 s fiT .ri (N ry F r °i•{ »+70x•„ t { a { j k„a rr{ir 1 ?k ~a°~`I `.55Iq K5, , i ^M+ s - ~ JM. e,t. :'fr 5 Z t 4.. l:F'` i v ...lg , '*Lc t ett ' t W 4 ' ra-~, r _ k kM?i` J 4 ,.k 4- 1, V~t ° r' d ~}:rrvw l dduxt M k F 7. rr, S'. d Y }F 1 3 xd pp'' '•°~„v'SAe .4 ' Y• 4 1 „~dx r •.r: ~,t,. ~K• { t P s 'v~=y` 'iY" .9 4 • J. ,y, i zJ ':el~ s xA'r r _ _ +1' >'kr i . } t- ^.;ArFt't • ~:Y~+1' i'G f tq J~, 3 r„ t Z "t ~ ' > - g s. a~ > Ae.,,y 004 I i,"4 l- EXHIBIT B Unified Sewerage Aggeency k Recycled WastewaterProed ' Cost Summary (Revind S/M) Open Trench constaution tr ion 2 - stem E on - la li Iran 12 to i$inch TFt erg I*«edr PI rre Ii Canslnxtlon-'~ Rtvar CroNfn To"? Capri Eam e Section 1 6eeti 5sat'a 3 saelion 4 Betio Nia. Vdva neaNl r t: y ` Tualatin Cou dub 60,8% swaoi sA3 018 $101238 s0 9W $0 591209 1318 877 r P c of Tiord 20.8% $19622 $14749 600 $0 80 BI so so s0 97t Tualatin 5.0x $4470 540 $8327 523510 so $0 g0 57 547349 r U•S.A' 13. U 11,890 $8417 0 $22187 0 50 gq t $0 $19989 $63464 Total Coat of Element 100.0% _;9400 70 90 fifi 800 i 752 529 5 0 9900 116 700 19 668 p 'USA contrbution is based an the added coat for increasing pipe size from 121o 16 inch. Pr*JM Percantage summary TANes Pro}ect PrgaUAeroa9a I IroCon I n AI Cronin f Acreage Pnwntaga Percent of Pro eat o 2 - S 'on i Sectbn2 SeeBon 3 S04 4 Section 5 M dues Canetnxm r l TUddin Could Club 73 60,8% 60,8% 0.0% 76.9% 0.0% 100.0% 60.8% 76.9% 76.9% I C orn rd 25 20.8% 20.8% 100,0% O.ox 0.0% 20.6% 0.096 0.0% t k C of Tualatin 6 5.0% 5.0% 0.0% 6.3% 100.0% 0.0% 6.0% 6.3X 6.3x U.S.A • 16 13.3% 13.3% 0.0% 16.e% Yo 19.3% 16.8% 18.8% TotN Cost of Element 120 1 0.0 100. 100,0% 100, 1 oo.ox 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100 Ox r ,t s i I t " 0810aw 1 CATCURK t 4 it'~C Y, S '~5 -1- ry( xr 5,"a . t r _ ~~r - - I,':< :,.F,A,.:Maiv'x s~; aF"'~^,.. 4~-! x,- ,f~„, - I -,u'1 C- ,.I .Ji Y- ' iti. _ _ y Y--'sa .~'~t` 's. t,~ mr, ,.4a ~;,r„ -i- „G HW 4 { C ~ 'n r Ptb ~ . .rrit ` L G } wt f .l tr' t . _ ~ `'z r t F . P !a'x ;'4 .ax'In ~'.}.5a ?•pr.:.°% SSW, t s' Y .a q ';vim- M,. tips`,.; y~ t i ur tJ+, N~~ f r ~S, id, r Y' 6 .S .f+;c' .y-'', .3 v'r , .i". ~`.r,4 d'' f~, •V -d .Y+ e -:~.•wfI° ~M. ~y~ ,k' saµ la;: 77 77,,~ '~i. t-, c 'Yr•-'"K YT,f,. " •:-f ~ r ~ ii4 1a YY, (9- {:rv .,{7rx- ,~4... ^tPi. 14 t< i n sue""^-.,, r}. y Tn ( Ca""Y'4!;~Ar I I ....r~-.•.o-..m-.^'F l'YF •rt%' ~~"rf TT1777 r ti 3 _2L J 1 r I,,.~. i e <i-,,1 ~ t ~I 1 I t' iNr .n ~`~ri ~I,•'".~.i j ~ {s ~ ? s~ ~ , ® _ 3 { 1 ~ r;I ~ j~: r I t''- I f Fr"::' zi4. I .Y~ la ~ y~ ?'~f I .k~'-_ ~ ~,•,<r I?~ ii. ] i E;',.., di rt. 'Iwi ~r r i r ~k- L 7~'~ I jti!~:i l,r it t..}h I, r 1~;f~,:~' 9 ~ I 4 r Y ~ i I , y, _L,_ ~ . , . „<u ~ . _ Y r✓- - - .~I:41r~_I .i ~ _~~.~ki s ~ ~~i?; . ~ a Lam. - ~ i IIS . 1„K~ ,yd' fa 4' bu. P' :A~ _.r, k +;-A:"• X •yx, ,r. +r,kx„r .7.',hN- '~~:i~a 5. '..~a, x h w.l - S :r` ya'. -,t' „v:,' ;q•- •TV, A., k,✓4., ~is",`a^~ C T~'1:~7"l: , Y. ,i: 'c'^"~,x, P :..hfi:-. •n v+..m .-F, ':vs 5 ,,,..;ys. r•,axa x;. s,A: .,fb,,,1 ,:a*.'- i I,,~ .d> 2, ,a .e t4 red'. _ ^ A .•-fe rr 4' 1 ,~.C.. ar uwPL, - .r.4; P .•'s. isnF 3'a tii` N'd,• :a.~ ~x S" t ; V" ~ M 4 al"a. - { rieP' 4' Lw'l r,u Fa. 1rY.r"•..4N: y. '-.'{'r .tl >P.. f ~°x "~E+.Y"' porn .rS .d ,M t SYfn. Xt ' • '=4,t' i' Y h'vx k Y •.l"t}. . F - ~°s?,v tv.'e't , v.n'+ 5 M N, i"I,., ` .see x..y.._ .,;.,@,•: r„+. , .r«s. { { fs z :'1.. AN , A Jr P;<" ,L - S ' lL e'. i "b42 s,~, ' J W ~ -~'u" 4 r P•f :'G. _F: vi" '9'" :bt C r"r .,,f ..Sf 1 `fir^s`^N .-:t .v r ..^;r,= L xaE L 'F4 'iYF^. F ,'1 to n%L.'„r 'A~'•', _ _ J`.. .w „'1 `:}"n.._.Vt,x A',. y -t~,.. ' , ,v.+ ,a•, -l1• , x fir r ~ : r• , t : aT ,'a a F:;, ,M1 "h•. rr tin E. h ,r .r' rrsa, +'rj y 1. z^tR. .Y;l, ~ vS.W. .4 A.•:' -3' ! J f .,;y6'c 5 kk+ ws rr 'f x 4 aen'^e. i~•'~}v ?.:1,-,`' f " ~ i 'd°,.:p-. , , Y' P €'Y - . Td`•'d^{~,x 9 . L s ti,,y4 r .~rrva .,E„, . hrr ll~~ A', ^M 3 } '.v ~`lY A v's v,-•.:..'~kY; 3 a _M 'a~m' ,.a . ~EuA. ~li~~.ft~~i '~^~f:-_,b,-,i. -rY.''rG~'a'~G~k'ui"n~ta~n'Io.,`~+'d. °~+1:?a' :z Rt ~CS ~Sf {3 V`~ ``Jf J1~"`~{"~ti`k .1 rNt,+9¢~~~~,h,{hyCkz, FI M~~~}A`Cl°x•V ,4]_- ~''Y. i ~ t l r ~ M1 A ~ '.1r~ • •~~~x ~+r +ef L' '3^ i'i~~3. ff'` f d EXHIBIT B Unified Sam crap Agancy , t s ak { Recycled Wa ►reter FproJeW µ Cost S , ummary(Rsvised 411198) ~ Open Trandh Gargtrud on 4 6 r Ion 2•S edam ton. 1 u »om12to1alnds _ x POW &*Werine, Ppmlte P tlfm Conakl man IuVw Croat In Taal Cone i Aans B Swilon 1 Sodon2 actlon 3 Seotk.,n 4 Section 5 v per &my Tti018 Hn Courtly, Club 60.9% 194 1 60 $108,911 $16,M 11211,014 638 9W,862 842 4 CIty W TkWd 20.8% $13,748 ¢8898 543024 So so so 59.582 so &0 V5052 > 'a CI 'ar Ttalat~ S.0% $3,T0 62 088 958 00 $2 WR 99 677 882 - U.S.A' 13.3% $8,778 654 $23,869 60 60 118 1865 $12.462 845 x TotA C o1 otnant 100.0% 6 7 3024 141 738 i%S 1 974 000 11x100 174,000 266 n 'USA contribdon is based on the added cost for increasing pipe size horn12to 181nch. fi~ f f I r { ! a 4 L f ; t 1 l ~l 'I ~ Y I s ,t { S i { e tr d ' I r 07!31196 1 CATCC2,WK4 3 r ar . 1- r '~x ,f~~x 5 6 { ..Ai.:,. z ~ .,iP ,mot 1 ! l ~f p V,~ y Ern ft: a, s .s h k. n ~ s t h 4 _ i~'Y= t }P~ A M1t, v h s :Y 1's{^i ^ V546 R xis ' ¢ -A N - ,ra. ,-4;..n re: YsM +Ar'~`. ~~7, 'S. i'kr+~` r.J• .,\.i .7 ..f ' •.Aa., „ .,y R - _..rRr, x t' ,p. ."'4, a •'r z' , !~S a - r s c n-ty' !}:j z `.i .k' •a :Y., ,'fr fe•r ~I ~ t S :a p ti. r n: Yp`"+k• ,.td: a:?u{" .,i"~'S :iv ^ rX' . -r - r•. a,rr ^"N-, .'n"I+'„ q . '~y,,. a,.l~ ..i:,. F "r!'~'.. , 6•'s •'h•" af"'(d' .s. '.5 Tai , ; 1" " -••ry ,1't,+ , .f`+hi •,d "'G;r buy, 1.r^;; 4z S xh ^`w IL. .afrve 7Y r'rf?Pt++ 't,. ..i. C ,I%'n r~:' P, #'•d rh,. .F" . V G~' "£'h ~ '~P@j s`•~%`? ny~. - ~ 'ef P,, ..~.,,.bi,_•°. x, N:^, .":rr' 3,ru ,iSYt `Jri°% .h •L,. r_~?" „1, '`'.F{'i < 55~ V •+7: Ynr gg`+ Rt• aR1R'v' k ; r:',.«"a. "v, "~r, 'r%Y~ rk:E':7». `..7 d.'° 'at`~.;d,'~ "^5c E '4x +•iy .~r, n.~,: n.ke '1} A `,°{a %"4. ^i ....,...:'r7 •nt't, s"~to °:'9Y.~ $ Si} i-~ ~ +l- y, r g k ,tn ~ &+~;°~a':.,,",~ ~ Ln°: ! 'ri.. ~ ~ . C R ~ .'7, n'l;, ,i,r•,, ` a r' f+' ~ ' S'am' . r ' S. a :,"a i Y~.•~' . r~ r t - o;- ' ;a;;,?.tr• ~ , I t+, ~ ,our ..ry..:b.. ' y~ k.« r^a~^ ' a r:~:5 . 3 b ws• S :Pr.'''w;n . J, , tr,,,. ~y•h`-?.t ,c'~•:t r#, ~ Yr. . r .cs T,ar _ ^~.,..,w a9, A Y 4<. 'f,.i":r;i''"'a• r+t- 'i'rz' R{ a{%'~"•;A£^v",a' S.'u na•„F - qt :,r' •L ,s;1.t_.r rP,.~'~'': "Y, r_,i' :,a,- hr~'r;.~r 1~'. Ni" ~ =Y'., ~n 3 ~ { S .E •:,:t,.,.,, 1„ 1 "SWbar R a+~'`S.v ~ 'e2 •S'Y 2 ? gq^ '.xn' S. , } „p t{~. `"'a ` is',r: ` ` ` t +:,wy ~ r' r. - 1 "~.,.,.f~' ~~r,-v . ~,~k„ ~ r,_ `~•arr:,,."~ „ew,~,::,." -y;, ~ , 1 1 r,t _`.I t I~ 6 L f l r b v5 , :4rf t ''-'tt " yt^'}`"~~ p s ;rr• , F a1,i ~.Ly fl, r~'M1t I; ,