Loading...
City Council Packet - 06/11/1996 % y ~ b t CITY OF TIC D r CAS OREGON 4 TI^vi~~v vi Y COUNCIL MEETING zr _ JUNE 11, 1996 ci ~ 1 ~ t M a b 95 3 ~ f COUNCIL MEETING iLL BE TELEVISED x 3 i~ ~p t=' I ~-J i:ladm\jotccpktt.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd„ Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 77 7 . > f ~ ~ Z_.~r x wft.-i - - ~ - - - -a Std - ~~xQl F , " ~ . - - - . 7 : I ~ ~ i,..,. - , - ~ - - L " I ire r ,y a _ ` F<E`h 2- I t waw.a+S:..-..s - , ~ , ~ . ............_.a... y fix' - y, fy i.p t, 3 C ka} C'{, 1 4 M ti J~ k - N 5 tY~ S „1: i y's '"k ;vim $;s:> <; . ` ; > CITY OF TIGARD x F ~ a a~ Yp S gttjK~`~~'pL}}7th#I,~a~17C~s~E` rd a' ♦ d 3j: y - 1.111 - k G - ` p j VIMte 544 1 r3Q. M : , om ,00W:4,8 ,a" 11 I - lu*o ;pi*~~_ iGlrFi;?; s~` ]„5` ♦y , t3 +Y R Y y s i~ _ -r ~kr,r3 3 g- i x r j PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the x' 7 appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the r t , w rv sx~ea T. I r Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be 'ham , - 412- -4 two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting r ; either the Mayor or the City Administrator. - F _3 i ."$g, 414 \ 3 Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying { , ti= be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda ; items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m ' ;0 4r ~ _ c Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and s~' j a4. should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the , E r ~ Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - 4 ~ - , - Telecommunications Devices for the DeafD. ~ 4( Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: + , r s • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing , ~ ' impairments; ands ~3 • Qualified bilingual interpreters. X ,1 j i tir Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is Y,\ t~ important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your x i need by 5:00 p'--j- ,m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone i" z f numbers as listed above: 639-4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - " " ` j r Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).; , . SEE ATTACHED AGENDA J a>«., - v - ,a .~s•....~. 6 k 1 I , COUNCIL AGENDA -JUNE 11, 1996 - PAGE 1 x~ ~ 4~ i; , a . - , - , - ~ I ~ - _ , r ~ ~ _ , , - ~ ~ _ -t~~-?~:-~~;~ - L A £ , E~~ ~'r~,~,,~:~~,,~,~,,'.:~,.--,,'~~l.~~ ,,-;r , ' ' T~ ' -_,~L'~'-;' r ' - I , r ~ ' ' ~ , ~ , 'L - :7 , r",,,~' , - ~ -5~ - _-r~'. , , J s - - 7~ - - ° 5 « ~ , L ' , - 7 1 'r - I ; r , I I - , , ' ' ' L~ ' ~ ai&F_ - - . , - 1 r 9 e, b f t R .4 'f t - r i - 'j F Z ,-I_ E ~ a - - ~ ,.r ,r,, r , . M r Ay Y _ y - F ~.4TA A Ay_ _ - f' 4 _ 71-11 - f17CWgRg sY--~02-V~;'-F1 '_-~t-~z -~~"~;~'.~:i - - - I . - , , . - I.- . - " - -11 - , - ~ I S~• ` - .t r t - J _ - x- a- 4 - Yam r-t a - ,5 _ t ,..,t «5A {dyC., M w - - - i- rat ` ~ ~ 3x 4 =a+s:r - a - ..._,.-...A... - _ _ i iy4q`• e'* V' s .}'fie Jyv`. - - C E S' g 4.~_, bin 2 AGENDA ~ = ~ 1'3 . f CITY COUNCIL MEETING -JUNE 11, 1996 ' I zh +.r - 6:30 P.M. . STUDY MEETING k ' ` > Cook Park Update ~ Y $ ' ~ , ` > Discussion -Wetland Policies ; > Elections Training information > ,",g-cru8 Review , ,1 - q* > The Tigard City Council may go Into Executive Session under thetiY f 1 provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), er (h) to discuss labor ~ < .t T{' a ` relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation ;`M`',~ s k issues. All discussions within this session are confidential; therefore, z 'W - 11 -1 ¢ ~ $ nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those presents ' - ~ " ' 4 Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session, e,": but must not disclose an information discussed during this session. s - 1 7:30 P.M. any k?-e vtti'>e~,x" Ai y it ~.:k'. f 1. BUSINESS MEETING ~ 11.1 , - RA a" " " 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board r# , } 1.2 Roll Call ,.u * 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance - { t a.~%-' ~,'~W 1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports " ~ r ~ 5 11 v, 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items # f t:N t ' _ A-~ 7:35 P.M. -R° r,a',~fi" f ,a. _ 2, VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) , `v 4 ' "I 1, " - , ¢ J t - 7:45 P.M.< YZ}d £ 3, CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be f r enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request vk X " that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. 3~ Motion to: ~ `mot i a, 3.1 Approve City Council Minutes - May 14 and 21, 1996 X x ""k ` 3.2 Receive and File: € 4 x~ a. Council Calendar z ~ E b. Tentative Agenda 3.3 Approve Board and Committee Appointments: a. Appoin Craig Wanichek to Budget Committee - Res. t : ~ .~,-,,~,~,~~~4,;,,~,r~,,,,:,.,.~,,'~.,,,,,, 11 No. 96-,,-? ,4 " 11 b. Appoint Michael Neff to Planning Commission - Res. ci No. 96-3 Co " - ~ ppv " 3.4 Local Contract Review Board - Award Bid for 130th/Winteriake Drive ' _ - l ; 3 t r - > Bridge Connection to Mowat Construction Company and Authori - a ze t L the City Administrator to Sign the Contract s " y ~e ~y 3, x (Consent Agenda Continued on Next Page) £ ~t~ t, ,Y - 'K L-_ 4S a A ~~--m-^ ' COUNCIL AGENDA -JUNE i'1, i996 - PAGE Z ~ ~ 6~ 1~- A zs _ i -1 a r x' F t r ,e ~ - C ~ - ~ F - y ft r' y Y i 'fir $L i t" k - 3 r-H' V ' _ a __.Ilo 11 y ILL _ F - i - ? E, i t tp ' '4'` - - I - 7 r 1 p-iM t t - t a-p s a ,t r 9 - 7 - i a- a.U S - - s ^ w I - I I I I I 11 4 : ~ . , , . - 21 j pphh - k J' ,emu, y - - - - } 66.6 a Y Y 3 - 11 { "~`~_t L Ft~ x u4 =r r # - a ' :0 V x ~ 3.5 Initiate Vacation Proceedings for Approximately 6,445 Square Feet of k 4 r ' W ~ ~t s - Public Right of Way on SW 135th Avenue - Resolution No. 96- 'z < M ,<y - ; - :~.3.6 Approve Public Library Services Agreement and Authorize the City `'z'= .n ~M d ~z -"'S - Administrator to Sign A[7 - .F f i f . 3.7 Approve Amendments to the Community Development Block Grant 4 (CDBG) Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington County Ir" r - y, xs Consent Agenda_-_ (ferns Removed for Separate Discussion: Any a 4 ° g I ,V items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council , has voted on those items which do not need discussion. - _ It" I 7:50 P.M. a ',~_~4 rxa-~S ~tY,~a~d. y, zk - ' s-' _ ' F 4. PUBLIC HEARING -1996-97 USES OF STATE REVENUE SHARING 'p,,$` ' ~ a. Public Hearing Opened ~-s~~ r 6 , r Y , ~ s b. Declarations or Challenges , P a h fir' Y E C. Summation by Budget Officer , d. Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents z ; r e. Recommendation by Budget Officer 4 f. Council Questions or Comments sE f s~~ tT ? g. Public Hearing Closed . h. Consideration by Council f g g ' • RESOLUTION No. 96- 38 - A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE rj ~t Zl ~ x. CITY OF TIGARD PROVIDES SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR x, f STATE SHARED REVENUES4 rf " ~r - ORDINANCE NO. 96- - AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE 4FI f s CITY'S ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES 3 ~ , ~ s 8:05 P.M. a ; ~ ~ { ri, .1 I - 5. PUBLIC HEARING -1996-97 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET ,;f a ' I s a. Public Hearing Opened q~ b. Summation by Finance Director , - r C. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents) } k d. Recommendation by Finance Director lilio ~v~4 ~ ,1 e. Council Questions or Comments r 1V5 it ~ I'll f. Public Hearing Closed z g. Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 96- 2 ~ . ,.1, r x y ~ f > 8:30 P.M. 3" % . MW! 6. PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT i",- ~ } ,ti ~ PROJECT PRIORITY LIST A M ~ p t a. Staff Report: Acting City Engineer FJS ~ _ ~ E h- b. Open Public Comment Proponents, Opponent) C. Close Public Comment -i ~ ~ , d. Council Discussion ~ i i~~ ~ ; e. Council Consideration: Determine, by Council motion, the Capital r x I Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 1996-97 as ° U` 5 - 9:00 P.M. t S21 -A ~ ° M77 , t 1UU1MVIL AGENDA - JUNE -1111, 119960 - PAGE 3 lx" - "t-~- _ 3 4 a } a, t r e, ~ C s - r'11 _ a-v c i 9 =r b s" t E --a, 4y a yk h > "q f£ t f ~ a ,rte Y .ur - 1,1 I y 1, s , , i ` S - s 7F -r L T y- r r - - ~',r-aE ids _ E 1 J aP' Et -i ~~i - h 2 M, . . ~ 1. - I ' - -_1 - t ` ZL!LLLL Iz Y Mkl' BENZ 91 A0 Vol, 3t 1~ RMAI ggg s x b 4 a C 7. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) -COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT f _ & ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ABECO/Cox)-CPA 96-0003/ZOA 96-0004 } REQUEST: Amend the text of the Housing section of the Comprehensive Plan by amending existing policy as follows: 6.1.1 Implementation >'_z+L Strategy 3 -modify policy to include wetlands in the list of sensitive lands Y from which residential density can be transferred, and to remove the language which allows no more than 25% residential density transfer from all sensitive land areas. The application also proposes an amendment to N'iku - Tigard Community Development Code 18.92.030 to allow 100 percent «„tF , density transfer from all sensitive land areas. LOCATION: Citywide. 4 e APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, f`j 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Tigard Cfv.m.;;ehee±sive Plan policies ~ s h ' 1.1.1(a), 1.1.1(c), 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.4, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 6.1.1, 6.2.1, 6.3.1, 6.3.2, 6.3.3, 9.1.2, Tigard Community Development Code 1 S t F chapters 18.3, 18.84, and 18.90. ZONE: N/A a. Public Hearing Opened V `1 b. Declarations or Challenges _ c. Staff Report: Community Development Department z d. Public Testimony: (Proponents, Opponents) 2 r e. Staff Recommendation f. Council Questions or Comments z g- Public Hearing Closed ; xyt , h. Consideration by Council: Motion to Direct Staff - f - 9:30 P.M.#.`..,,,`{`~,>., s 8. CONTINUATION (FROM COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21 1996) OF PUBLIC ; w HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) - ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA)s~ #1 96-0003- DEDICATION, RESERVATION AND IMPACT STUDY REQUIREMENTS - The City of Tigard proposes amendments to the € k t - ~t Community Development Code Sections 18.32.050 8.5, 18.32.250 E.2, 18.96.010 A. and 18.96.100 A. and B. to require impact study, reservation and dedication requirements for public facilities and services. , LOCATION: City Wide. ZONE: N/A. APPLICABLE REVIEW ? x CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 11 and 12; Tigard x~ Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1 a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 3, 7 and 8; tier ' Community Development Code Chapter 18.30.; y a. Open Public Hearing y 1,~ t .a b. Declarations or Challenges' ' C. Staff Report: Community Development Department i d. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents) s M F' Y3,a ' 7 t r e. Staff Recommendation f. Council Questions Ir t g. Close Public Hearing < F h. Council Consideration, Lt < cf it _ ` e 2 $ 3L 1 r 3 wa S a C Ctl1Nr11 Q~Fnlnm _ _n iNIG q4, 400A. DAf~G_ A t a a_ Y~ Y w' t i *Sf C _ 4 +I t yG°Y ~ CA ^.i f 1 k ! - - f t t 9 c S A L i r L t f $ A i J ft ~ ~ j S- f ~ TA a - - _ array r _ t ~r _ - - - - 1 R L 4 - - - ' t r -7,7" ^ 4 ' 1 '~},y £d' -W ~ ~T.aw.r y y - k _ a~5 ~ "4^ ~ ys=s ~ , . `c j "4. g, 4}~ - r 't.=, r - t ll. t F{ S.- -s3s~r MEW 3 a ~'E 6r s.~x. 'T"z~ e7° .r+, _ i`+N t - _ j iY' '.s y ,t,a~MY' j . . Kr '4 c- q - - P - t 5 - ;Ly Q » , =~~w .a[, t p L'} R f ""T -.ax. ,"a .F^' x 1 'ty° - , ~ A 4 _ t z Y 3.~~'ts ;~1 x ~i+1~r~- -a^s ~c°2.`FL ......._......,._...........u._..«L .~..a_»...........~.1..s«. ?s 's. 5, yts u$~ "'F~"l r w - vhf . fi _ - ' .2'>4.R eg - ~G - _ ~ , " ~ f .1. i~a a,, s 9:45 P.M. ',?~nkt at - - ~ 9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS1 ^ LL(~ ' ~ rc 3 " kl,w~ i 1 9:55 P.M. ty } j ~ 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive 4 ; , Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss ; a 7 labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation 4 4 ~ ~ issues. As you are aware all discussions within this session are r - , y those t confidential therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed b r 3a r r - r , { F present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this`,1. h =fa a b a X` gt, x Y~`x ' s-- s, _ session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this n:~~ - sF z session. _sr E r - Est *'3Sa - - - z '''Y'~i, - a- - 70:15 P.M. ~ Nmg W_ ` y , - 11. ADJOURNMENT { i Y5„ r fi 3- cca900611AOC y' N ~ xc ~ a IL WA, 4C P '8., 2 k _ - u i z err, _ rv - : 7 , z P':. ;z z 6 r r , j r' 5 ta~ t - C - z- t, E 3~~ tit Xt 141 3 n .41 11 I - 41 41 41 ? {Y s fk t ,,r r r~1~ 5 ,.rb Y 1 L&t c.,,*a apfe A a y -r ,F7 W,P", ,'r ,e p6 a Y~ ~~,m s r~ , ,,~r E r'.~' ~'t~Ya ! -.t -I p k l c~ J f } rkrAr,`" . r i r ' Cnilydril A(_FR!1~®_ _I! IlzF 17 1996 _ PecoE G c LL - r a f - _ r' a a 3 e ,r i _ r f.'x' Y' L, 'q I I . ~4rf~ L - , f, 14 f~5 t e 4. 1.r 4 3''~` ..1. 7 - t - fix- r '"x - 3 t~ - d f r - , .~zz P otrg .l t :1A n b .rt P' _ t -F f - b J - rm--~s7~-M2{ + r; z - - - 3 - ~"rft- , ffl,f- , - - ~.-i I., , -,~i,,~~- - - , , , . ~ , ~ ~ [ FI h w x -,-ter fix'-r*-+_- , _ . . o' ii~ 7 r - r r t L - I a I , t - { ! ' ' - - z s ark g, ~g x' r '0"ta .t-k y.3dX 5' ,r F' 'r d ~I. - F ,_r R Agenda Item No.-:LL- ~ UK , r h~ { r Mlr rY1`19W, Meeting of Q (O Y ~ - TIGARD CITY COUNCIL L s r ~~.-1 ice` SC tit , k MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 11, 1996 , • STUDY SESSION j. ~ x t i t r c s x - > Meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Jim Nicoli s ,L_, S_,fi > Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli, Councilors Paul Hunt, Brian Moore, Bob , - y en Scheckla. z ~ Rohlf, and K iC - - k` > Staff Present: City Administrator Bill Monahan; Associate Planner Dick - ^o ; ur'•° ne;.eio,,,Pnr nirecrnr Jim Hendryx; Finance Director` a$ r IewCisdoiu, l t , Wayne Lowry, Assistant to the City Administrator Liz Newton; Legal Counsel Z el Tim Ramis (introduced associate Legal Couns Paul Elsner); and City Recorder - x; h t. ~ - , a Catherine Wheatley. k t6 .11 ty y s > City Administrator Monahan mentioned that staff would like to know which- ~ a - .4 Councilors intended to attend the MPAC meeting tomorrow night and the , - ~ ' 4`~.~~~;n 4 k t~ r Washington County elected officials' caucus Thursday night. He announced that F, ' F s a he, Mayor Nicoli and Councilor Hunt were meeting with the City of Durham on Y e - , x June 26 to discuss how the Cook Park expansion might relate to Durham Park. - 4 , t s i > Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel, introduced Paul Elsner, a new attorney with his s ~ R I . firm who also works on City of Tigard business. He reviewed Mr. Elsner's r , ; w ,1 background. He noted that Mr. Elsner was the liaison to staff. h~. 3r r > Councilor Scheckla asked if the regulations on high grass would be enforced this , - LL r summer. Mr. Monahan stated that usually staff tried to step up enforcement ~.4 ~ ,P-. efforts if there appeared to be a safety hazard; that is, vision clearance (for ~ r traffic) or fire. r, - .III _ $ - A111 . - -111 t y a~ ~ > Cook Park Update , ,.x u c - ti, ~~ku n Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director, reported that out of the 34 a x _ Request for Proposals (RFPs) distributed to the consultants, eight proposals were t - - 33 [ ' received. ! to ! - Mr. Hendryx stated that staff hired Fishman & Associates delineate the wetlands tr on the Thomas property. He reviewed the type of information that the `x`T consultants would provide. He directed attention to the memo summarizing the t 1'^- f s-. r concerns expressed at the South CIT in {18 people filled out comments } F, M sheets). He noted that the main concerns included: - " p h i L N k - f f W y _ i j ' si t...i t .asp- xis ~M - . Tom- t 9 nlmv COUNCIL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES _ JUNE 11, 1996 - PAvi i I ; 24 - Aj~ sj q 4 x,-s iµ T-} r r p to S 1 2-i^,,.-..-...S;S xe; #-y ' t { &fr^'-~' f S" ty A,y. - _ f r y s "7 4 t - q4 A €p' 0 Y A - - - _ %V't S r tu-F" 1 ~L 1w - 4 - Y. y1 L z t z r 1 !`t - 'j f f Mi F', 5.,.7 g ors ~ dt J ~E fr IT -1- k i 4 r6F a / F - ~o - •...~n--r °-~1~~~-T~ ` --"._`F~r T _r; r ^.x'1'+7-~! ~J' s - , - 9 = 'l , M ~ , ~ ---.'4 " " , - , ~ - ~ , ~ _.-~_,_:_z_1Kz--~ --~~,~~'I'~--,,~~,,-'~,--~,---~.,w--.-_~f , r e ti ~ X r t''.~. w x .k Y 3 '„y_ h. t `'x - t s - - - _ ,4 .'t,'y''i 4ta`'3J 5 -a j, r c f r i- ( y"¢ti'a~,- t C E K 37 , " i y - r - s .2......_....__._.. _ . - .~..~e.s>, -'vow ~ , ~x?' t~\ ,F~r< `-"ter='-'_j c `R~1i-- -_r _ . I % . fr 3 +2 <y'~s _ s, s _ fit ,"lTS ¢ S,S. S S4 1 2 t3s2 a rs ' . rte" , ate; - - 5 _ w s ~3r s' . 1. Participation should include more interest groups and there should - ,;A> z • - be a broader representation on the steering committee. - _r* r F ~F kr, N 4 - 0.i r ? 2. A parks master plan should be developed for all City parks (not _ - s' " just Cook Park). ; f I- - ; - - - q - M _ y{1 i Y 1_5v ~ Brian Wagner, South CIT, stated that the RFP appeared to be written by those with an interest in athletic fields with no representation of those who valued Cook Park as a natural area or by the neighbors concerned about the impacts of the f , _z_t _ r acs x changes. He said that a group of citizens was meeting tomorrow night to draft a letter explaining their position. - s i - ' t~. _ f t. t Mayor Nicoli asked if the CIT was aware that 25 acres of the expansion would be purchased by other people with only 10 acres purchased by the City. Ms. `.a?11 , i - Newton said that Duane Roberts had explained the situation during a question- ~a I F krr P-` and answer-period at the CIT meeting. Mr. Wagner stated that no one else had _ % I I 1~ r ~ ` been solicited to contribute funds; other interests might have been interested in u contributing but weren't asked. 1 ~ f Mr. Hendryx stated that Mr. Roberts gave the CIT an overview of the RFP i, ~ I _ contents and the public involvement process. Mr. Wagner said that one of their l ,1 ' i , tc . ' I ~ ' 111~ :11 IFE concems was that the public involvement should have been done prior to sending t, a } z A the RFP. 7 h ti' r ill. _ Mr. Hendryx stated that staff would provide Council with regular updates on the '4 r a,N - t process. He commented that part of the parks CIP included funds allocated over , x ';g ~ y a 4-5 years for purchase of park areas. , - i, 7 > Discussion: Wetland Polices £11 f ~ 5 „ _ X ? X,, , Mr. Hendryx commented that with the last request to use City wetlands for " , mitigation, staff thought it advisable to develop a policy laying out the process for , ~ - ` r £r>.~,~~, ~.111- I'll hose who wanted to use City wetlands to mitigate impacts of their projects. - h ` l tz Dick Bewersdorff, Associate Planner, stated that this policy from staff's lY z_ standpoint potentially provided as much flexibility as possible. He reviewed the k-µ 'w ` ~ ~ a y , six points of the policy, pointing out that the decisions on whether or not a y , request met the criteria lay with the Council. The criteria included documented;, 4 ; physical enhancement, benefit to the City, compensation to the City in the form r" , k H r of rent or a lump-sum payment, no additional maintenance cost to the City, a x t', , direct relationship between the mitigation and land development within the UGB, ~x_ I 1111-1 1111-1 - r and no potential for onsite mitigation. He stated that the City had about 80 acres x i~ M- ' in low quality wetlands potentially suitable for mitigation. t ti i' 1 u: - _ 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1996 - PAGE 2 6 a _ F 9 y - Rf F - k r r _ - 4 'f F- S"" .y s - E- Z'F r 2. r, X - - x - - - - -,.4 - at -2 r - j T y,~i _ y Yx K,ryaf Y T 5 - d t "1 r 9 / ~r j - ,t✓' - fi ; J - ~ 11 , . ~ ~ a - , - - ry11 c'.-'`..,,.~ -1_:-, ~...,--.->r iry j 3.Y+T.--.%:__-1.--rte- T _'1 4 11 qt 63ax -,y ka - - - - - - 0 Yx. _ .C..vy^a 1 f 4 d.. S 4 :3!' - } _4 I •4,',- '1- t z ~ Councilor Scheckla asked about current process for wetlands mitigation. He x ak ~ r - expressed concern that building on natural wetlands could result in flooding and - .,.Y e tl` ° impacts to neighborhoods.`r Mr. Bewersdorff explained that normally wetlands mitigation required DSL " approval with a 3 to 1 mitigation factor to give more flood plain capacity. He ft fit ~a ~ y acknowledged Councilor Scheckla's concern as a question whenever dealing withh - ~ # 1 } wetlands, stating that one of the major considerations in applying this policy was F 4 k z the impact to the natural system. He said that this policy gave staff standards to review potential wetlands mitigation on City property and that any mitigation 4 ' ` request required DSL approval and must meet the City's standards. 1, a' h AWz Councilor Scheckla asked if the City was liable if people were flooded out of Y 11 j " their homes. Mr. Hendryx explained that regardless of whether it was wetland or P k ' not, people had to build to standards, which included building ahnve the floes g . r ~ plain. He noted that if buildings were built above the 100-year flood plain as ~ - _ identified by FEMA, the buildings shouldn't be damaged. , ~ ~ p f Councilor Moore commented that this policy allowed for enhancement of the 4 1 u 4~'~,; . " _ f„ City-owned wetlands. He said that they only allowed commercial or industrial i` t w development in the flood plain (not residential). In addition developers would x_~`"~_ `V-t5"','*, ,11 3 1 ha11" I ve to make sure that the excavation was equal to the amount of fill. u ~ ' t Councilor Scheckla expressed concern that the City prevent things like whatr ° A happened up on Aspen Ridge or Benchview from happening again. He stated that k ~ , -u he wanted to make sure that they were protecting wetlands. ' < T Mr. Hendryx advised another option would be to adopt a policy to disallow using ~ ' city-owned wetlands for mitigation purposes.: - mil 3 _ s q,!, s Mayor Nicoli commented that he thought that the policy was too tight. He said the State was beginning to say no to wetland mitigation on privately owned ° wetlands and may only be allowing government agencies to provide for mitigation _ ` 2 x on their properties because of a concern that private owners would not protect the 4 wetlands. He said that he thought it was in the City's best interest to keep ` r r'' f policies as flexible as possible and to evaluate requests on a case-by-case basis. s ~ ` _-v. ,M L I , <a In response to a question from Mr. Monahan, Mayor Nicoli said that he wasn't ' ` ;1 - concerned about properties outside the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB); he added that Unified Sewerage Agency had large wetland sites that they needed to s - z is mitigate. He said that he saw this as a balancing act with a need to find wetlands to mitigate in different areas. He expressed concern about imposing too many fl 4 restraints. He stated that he thought the City should act like any other private * 1 ,3x' 4 J >F , ;3 ~ r E CITY COUNCIL MEE1iNG MINUTES - 7Ui3E i I. 1996 - PAGE 3 " + yx t~ - E s _ . ~E Ash C Y F E i- ..1 - -4, ` ,t, -f - _ _ t } Y _ __rw .,.-~.-..s,_ ..r -r.. =.7 1~ x::~.~.__ s._ .a.~:: L .__t _ i.. .:d ..._.L.. . .+~_,_....y_ . _-n - - it , *~u 3 s ~ ' t r E x°] s ' a cs a r, y 2 :s.. n 4p fr{ Jt }YG 'i''- 5 1- k - S - s_ F a' g d air' e - - _ _ - lMv't3ti` 4.y 7 y3 { 7 d 1,j - Al -L~9#S _';r, t`J per 'v-_` E - 'I I P, pt' " I r~,; a property owner and evaluate whether a request to mitigate wetlands on their _ 2?_,_ _ 24,Vu t . property was in their best interest. He commented that he felt that the City , £ FZ r;-- would be dealing with this issue more and more as the UGB is developed. z ~ L Y,~" ' - , :1 - Mr. Monahan asked what it was in the proposed policy that the Mayor found < t;t „ ' =E - ! } restrictive. Mayor Nicoli cited the provisions that no new wetlands should be X ~ created and also the compensation to the City. He said that he didn't want to - - -j ' x " ~ _ + ` charge people for the use of City property when they would be enhancing it. He - t r noted that there were several areas of former farmland that were slowly becoming - r ' ' ` wetlands that could use some help in making the transition more quickly. ` ' ix' ' C `-11- I Councilor Rohlf asked if the City shouldn't receive compensation for the use of Z y their property for mitigation, the same as any private property owner. He noted ~xi ,k that they might negotiate a trade off or waive the cost. „ , ~ Mayor Nicoli agreed, stating that's why he wanted a more flexible policy. He f _ , I suggested identifying City-owned wetlands and putting the word out that the City i E r - was interested in someone improving those wetlands regardless of whether they . s were inside or outside of the City. ~e *Fl it Mr. Bewersdorff stated that that was the intent of No. 3. If the mitigation was of 4 .k _ ` : ` , t - ~ 10 x - : enough benefit to the City, then the Council agreement would not include r~ a~~ F a t ; compensation. He said that they could also drop the sentence regarding no new 4 ~s-r~~~ r _ wetlands. ` tJ Councilor Moore said that he didn't have a problem with taking that sentence out, ~ n D< IBM - - -mg a r as long as they didn't approve new wetlands on developable land needed to meet, ~F 4M-fit - V1 - the City's density requirements. 1s e ,I I ~ 0 , N Mayor Nicoli stated that he did not have concerns about the Council action (see ` r $ Resolution No. 96-32) on the Summerlake property because it was a unique ~ F ~ AK_ ,~~~e 0 NI - } situation. He suggested encouraging people to talk to the City tf the wanted to ` use City-owned wetlands for mitigation. ' 1 , t Councilor Rohlf said that he interpreted the policy as it was written as saying "we 4, ~ ~ v'" Y ~ o, f I rs..x don't want to be in the business" but what he heard from the Mayor was that "we e, " . ~ > r should consider being in the business if it was to the City's advantage." K'' yN ~ `ts ; ln, I Mayor Nicoli concurred. He noted that the City itself might have to mitigate t ' projects occasionally. E'S w , k A? ti Mr. Bewersdorff said that he thought staff wrote the policy because it was ra beneficial to allow the mitigation under certain circumstances and to rovide , guidance for the Council. P T`-$, ry F ^4 i - E - 3, ea( V - 'A r .sz - " CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NNE 11, 1996 - PAGE 4 > ; _ 4, ~ r t ; 4x, _ -V 1 f 4'T , 4 ~r~.8 _ i r~ - 1~ t 1 N'``' - F k 5 y UF- r ?t Ni t t _ 5 ~ Y - , ~,~~-,,,~~-4R'_4'9~,, L . " , , ~ , , ~ , . , , D r2§~ C - f E L - t1 •t { 24Jh p Z' 1Y I. n, 1 -fit 1 _ - cs dpg _ -i n { y J_ t -y t - ,_n -..~-i _.aii.i 4 4 ! ~ ~q 11 F .r _ r- _ a 4" -1H----.u2,-?, ~t4,"IM-a" , , - . , ~ ~ ~5~, W-,-14i'Mlli~zl , ~--,,Z~ W 10 Z t I I`^cn z. ,r + i - ( y f - fi - r' 4 r ?sue-.- -a€ - tr - c .fit > - r - e7€ >:s' tax J'r` - 1 Y, i, k a . ^ Y 4 f 1- 3 S~ - - 'P Q~~,t i <; t t~ Councilor Rohlf suggested including a preamble stating that the City was open to ` p -,r a _ F j r ~ ,t , - - the process. Ir -,C J 4 ti- a y: vJ'F _ Mr. Hendryx stated that staff would bring this back to Council after incorporating ` , I -1 ; k ~ 4 the comments heard this evening. Mayor Nicoli commented that he didn't have a hr , Y~ :s r - problem with the policy but that he thought they needed to leave their options F - x open as much as they could. s t~ r apx.F 2 - - t ..S- - ,rI Era f ,4g,,,~ 3s,` -g gg; Y" > Executive Session: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 7:05 ;,.r x4 k ~ . . p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (3), & (h) to discuss labor , ~s - sr fi x`i' a - a relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. ' ;,;R } -vii `tai f _ > Executive Session adjourned at 7:24 p.m. V ~ ,n E - > Update on Balloon Festival 4~t .:sh"x „ ~~i . x' Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder, reported on the Tigard Festival of Balloons. The event begins on Thursday at 6 a.m. as "Press Day." Asa F s_,~r - 'r: !Zi ' sponsor, the City will receive four balloon rides each day of the event. "'`v ' S-~ `i 0~' ' , ~ r a _ F > Councilor Rohlf refereed to the Gross v. City of Tigard case. He noted that the d # } ` r property owner on one side of the designation has already built out according to ~?~,4S -1 M; ` - the CN zone. He asked what would happen if the designation reverted back to c - y u a t n 1 NO } 0k F the original designation. 1 - d 111 -101. ft Mr. Monahan stated that people built at their own risk with the understanding that s -A -w.M if an approval was overturned, they would have to come back into compliance _ a t with the City Code. ' 'F ~ . " I n - j > Councilor Scheckla asked about "Fantastic Sam's." Mr. Monahan reviewed the ~gk r" ry developer's concern regarding the promptness of the City's review of his f-~ f application. He cited Mr. Hendryx's memo describing the problems in staffing r h~ " ' levels and change of policies that occurred at the same time as the application ;zt ~s ~ ~i ~ a, review. He concurred with Councilor Scheckla that staff's response time wasn't b: I g~ that far outside the usual amount. > Agenda Review y ' } ~ F k,- Mr. Monahan of two non-agenda items requested by staff: ; T. ~ f !r , x , 1. A resolution honoring Mr. Gene Seibel of the Tualatin Valley Water R R s - r - s 2. Update on sew oP issi-le at Ventura Court area. _ r CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 11, 1996 -PAGE 5 " _ ti ~y4 'y yti ,W 'S z- a x I - } - y .y- Y b yV Mt j } 'S r, - a✓ 4 / . r t`~ 3' z.^°,.---*,o_.>..ra-. ' r s - w* t y ^-,rzv-c y t _ 7 -r s - a r a' j " , .1 I "I 1 E - , - 'L , ~ ~ i ~ 'N i " - j ~ -x _ ~r 'A 4- - s t - , x i I'VO, b i t _ k §f ,a r .j ~ttfJ t -s",~" Y yr k1-~tiFl ~cHrz'; F F _ V 5 Y`i r 1 Y > xY J "I'll 1- h 73F V : ~ ~ ~ L~ , . ~ , , ~ : . - , - , - , - . - - I, , , - ~ - I ~ - $ ~ J i_.,.. _3,4uf_'.~..-_L'. -Y, t._-_'^- i~_-x_ ._.L~.. ~__X 11 - - - - - - . t i ry .N9`f^ 1 ¢~+,-~p -~1'a "§4L~s .ArS~Y y~ 1(44 - ( -S 1 1- 4tx°~ - 'e ',v X't lea. _ _ _ ? ~ - _ ~~4Ei-1^6£{"y 3 '9. s.. A ' ' 1 - \ YF"`- k- Yt h Y 'jn.-a sf .,u 6 b1 G `S; - 4 -Ors - ,r, " .n'-r . ~ffil ~3 - 61, - ? - , * , ~ W . , ~1~:'~_*~ _-~~,,---,~~Z-,' • 11 M x L.r-r~` -a - ...~i:..~,.,.r ....:.s.,......._.,-._.._ .....w - w.:=..a.~._ - _r a2s, 3'5^t.3 °z• "`t `h %,c¢M`'P ".j r ;-~£r "t,' ~r$ s ` ~F 1. :US1NEals t OEder BV City Council & Local Contract Review Board ' , 3 t tYti r Mayor Nicoli called the business meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. _ ~ 111 y 3 52 0 T~ii s,',' • Council Communications/Liaison Reports: None V4 i- ` 1 .4 1 N • Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items: See Item No. 9. j_- ~ „k , 4 r 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA b -4 # - r ~ f t ;;Y - # S "Al- d' - ~1 ~ ` Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, asked the Council what they considered to be k - . r t redevelopable land; did it include all the houses or just those that looked as if they could 3 7' - e~~~~ g ~ be redeveloped soon. He said that he thought this was an important issue. , 0 z Mayor Nicoli stated that part of the answer to Mr. Bledsoe's question depended on } R s ` % i ry whether Metro decides to require a higher density of build-out. The City might be . required to open up existing neighborhoods for redevelopment to increase densities. Mr. N ' - , ['i`~ r i Bledsoe stated that he thought the City needed to make a determination now about how . " _ i."'''` - ~ ORS they would look at redevelopment. y A t ? - I' 7,` Mr. Hendryx stated that staff had maps based on a set of assumptions as to what was e4 F- considered redevelopable land. He explained that typically it was based on a valuation r P x t between structure versus property. He confirmed that not all housing was redevelopable,~N -J 3, only that which met the criteria.tu~~ y n - _x y- j ~ - ` x Mr. Hendryx noted that Mr. Bledsoe was also raising the issue of the infill that could ~ r ~ m occur on large lots. He said that infill has also been mapped by Metro and reviewed by _k _ r 3 staff. He said staff would provide Mr. Bledsoe with a copy of the map. i } 3. CONSENT AGENDA r x c..gg 3 0 - Y < - ' 6 ~'3 ` ~ Ic t i Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to approve the Consent I ' Agenda. = Shv E Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, x`''+'~ Y Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") r ~ ~ x, - r v, Y k fM1 ~ tea F -h'3.1 Approve City Council Minutes: May 14 and 21, 1996 ry` A" 3.2 Receive and File: b T a. City Council Calendar YF % _ " , k F - b. Tentative Agenda g< ~ " 1.11 k ~ 1 ` 3.3 Approve Board and Committee Appointments ` F - z, $ - , , a. Appoint Craig Wanichek to Budget Committee - Res. No. 96-35 b. Appoint Michael Neff to Planning Commission - Res. No. 96-36 u; s7 > ; LR= f e F_ yM ' C s CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 1 i, 1996 -PAGE 6 k - r Y - - W f is c- - A - zm~ 3 h " S y 1 1 4 ! f F _ ~$Fr~ 9 I - - r - >T - --r a r s'" 'xg a - s 's,~ E x w,Y Xf y ; 1 - L arrt YS E m^ a. L - 1 2 r - ,a t ,''t " ; it _ K-- f- - " 1, ? e ~,~p e-,3 l 4t~ _ 11, qx x 1a rats _ : ,r - - _ 1 r } v - x3 x Z " v t 1 _ y. -,-.--,r, f - - - crni-a^---a-z ^ - ` 1 ~n , s - = - a- 1 £ - * rv5_ I. a,,; d"•` _ } .__s i ' " fj. _..x y43~4 , ,W '??'Zt°i":~,`tiaj,9: ~'r'",,; -.r. °r,; y~t+Y~~; i`~ q!. S m x-'- 4a w v 3-`'$y'{ .c'~t r Y. - - M A- r - i t' S.'r ~ ~q'm i'c5. i'3 e , ~=.r ,,3-'te`e 3 1,, ,4e-,,- ~ z '"s wP -v - __t~,~,4i- - ,I- Kn--,__ ~ , 1, i'ltl 7 ~ - " _1 -1 aa_~~ 3 ~111 1W € ~ kY G ~ M , s Y 4xi~? r 3.4 Local Contract Review Boardf~~ - - Award Bid for 130th/Winterlake Drive Bridge Connection to Mowat r'~r 4 Construction Company and Authorize the City Administrator to Sign the ~ y ~ W i~n ~w Contract ' - 3.5 Initiate Vacation Proceedings for approx mately 6,445 square feet of Public Right ~ of Way on SW 135th Avenue - Res. No. 96-37 ~ ~ l` 11 , f ~ " j& N, Aw- s r~ r 1 3.6 Approve Public Library Services Agreement and Authorize the City t ~'1 q , F Administrator to Sign ~ 3~r`-~ g ' x ~ a 3.7 Approve Amendments to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) ~ 4 Y - - 2. I ~ Intergovernmental agreement with Washington County ~ , " , a . > Mayor Nicoli introduced the new appointees: Michael Neff to the Planning Commission ~ $ t and Craig Wanichek to the Budget Committee. to ~t~~ q 4h 4. PUBLIC HEARING - 1996-97 USES OF STATE REVENUE SHARING ~t~~ 1100r 1 R, k 7_~; e t ° a. Mayor Nicoli opened the public hearing. Fem.. N. s- I I b. Declarations or Challenges: None E , q~ t-a -F - - $~n fix zr"a° r: t c. Summation by Budget Officer , ~ s_~ + = - Wayne Lowry, Budget Officer, noted that Tigard received $200,000 a year 4 _ k' ~ , - from state revenue sharing. He reviewed the opportunities available for public r ~ ~ *F~ ' ~A 11, 1 comment and the requirements needed to qualify for these funds. C R Ei , - _ d. Public Testimony: None 1"`A- x~ 4 Y- g eT d aT "i i - - - 6-.. F 4 - W e. Recommendation by Budget Officer ~ 1 a ' i . ' Mr. Lowry recommended approval of the proposed resolution and ordinance. ~ - - s C . f. Council Questions or Comments: None AVAIRM - " z x' ` E g. Public Hearing Closed ."I- f~ F I 1,111-L 11. U t Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing. K ' 4 i h. Consideration by Council - - ` ~5 ] 5lg I £s i Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt K4, , nr ~~~r 3 ; z , R4 c_,i Resolution No. 96-38 and Ordinance No. 96-22 F' ice, x NA~ ~W L -ts 11 The City Recorder read the number and title of Resolution No. 96-38 and i 5 _ ` I 1 - ' j Ordinance No. 96-22. ~ ~ Q to, .Sn+ eL Z- x - - dh CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -NNE 11, 1996 -PAGE 7 r ~ V ` - 11 t f' - `e - _ q x - x`py € vs $,x3y - }s, s r A i d da, g~rx "~4 qx f - _ f s i ~k r 4~~'r 1 m e - ~Y i a v of -f - kI L; "it 3 a L - . , , - , , , - -L , -1 - 11~7 ~1~ 'Ili, - i -1,-IF _ , i j ~ ~ ~ " " " ~ . - ~ - ~ " ~ , - I - , - . ~ [5 - cii r ~ --Y. - - g." - - , - ,5A , REM I V ~ - ,Z -_'-:~L~1',:,,-, ` ~ ni,, ~777:65 1:,~'~. 411 0 x '3~i d r v Y . FS - ~ - f lT, L.._ .a e' - r o i x _ a I .V . s4 ,N, 5 a wl 11 ' RESOLUTION NO. 96-38 - A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY OF , , a . TIGARD PROVIDES SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR STATE SHARED ( ~ , t REVENUES { r f a 43 - ORDINANCE NO. 96-22 - AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE CITY'S i 3 s c ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES ¢ y,> fir- ~'z t~+- . 1 + Motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote of the Council present. (Mayor ~ ~ ~ ~t Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") c -tk ,spat :xs L~'_' by ^ta-s. r QM } - e'' t u-}a~." kiu e n 1 r 5. PUBLIC HEARING - 1996-97 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET - - Ssx - a. Public Hearing Opened n i `t1 - 1 IV~K W f ' Mayor Nicoli opened the public hearing. .f'`. E k - 3sri~ m `'l wl ~ b. Declarations or Challenges: None s r yt . 1",. z y. t, RI a rid ,'"n c. Summation b ~ - ` 7 t-- 4 h ; by Finance Director i ~t 7" - Wayne Lowry, Finance Director, reported that the Budget Committee made k - , - i x , l-, -1111111 - ,s some changes to the proposed budget and recommended that Council adopt the _ a ' = r budget. He noted the two options presented in the Council packet. Option 1 was 1, _ L_ ~ EMI i the Budget Committee's recommendation with no further changes. Option 2 g ' ' ? t ` ~ p,, ?''Y,ct '.4" ~ N. contained several staff recommended changes to the budget., M yWIN Mr. Lowry reported that the property tax rate for the levy for 1996/97 of $7.9 ~rv~~ Y million dollars increased over last year by .46/$1000 due to the tax base increase , approved by voters in 1994. He said that the estimated tax rate was $2.86/$1000 -s ~ ~I - ~ its `fie' -_1 I 1-1 _ which was lower than anticipated because of higher assessed values. He said that 5,x the assessed value they used to estimate the tax base was $2.9 billion dollars (this ' e, t included $100 million in new construction and a 4.5% increase in existing `r' _ 1111-h- _ FIN Property values). ` ~7 ~z - s x Mr. Lowry stated that the operating budget of $18,590,000 was a 5% increase - . y~ - - p over last year, with the largest increase in the Community Development _ W ~a - c- Department staffing levels. - - y g' s - i - h_ . I 1 g" Mr. Lowry reviewed the changes made by the Budget Committee to general fund ` & " r , projects. These included decreasing the annual $100,000 contribution to the - ~ $ " future facility improvements funds by $35,000 to fund the proposed police station y K_ ry ~X f improvement, increasing the amount for the Cook Park irrigation system, putting F ;4 - ; t - a N > back in funds for the feed store improvements that didn't happen last year, and re fi s z + T 1 appropriating funds for the City Hall roof project. _ -1 " ~,-?`~,:Z~,,,~-7-,8 ~~~r"-~', _ - \k I t ~ t CITY COUNCIL MEETING IvilNU 11 S RUNE 11, 1996 -PAGE 8 - big 1, f _ z z- s t r "ate f Y 7 - +kr~, k 1'" P~ - y1 y.' r 2 Y 'yi x n R ~ , ~J ~ ' ~.Y~ - - ''t t -lf F , - 4 { - _ _ d' S 3 h i R. .33, r 4 - ! ,~r,~. - d s - 5 h . - -:.L_ . `,..u12 i .v s- i.a_sr- .v_e_ _ _1 r - _ - - - n Z, I'm ' -r„ ~ _ r z Imo- ~ .3. '~"k,l"~ . . s r,.*-s" -+y,..,`~ <£fir' _ 3 7 - r.t rr 4 - '-W - . _ ''Pny,t -tea` x - z r... s- _ ~±t m *Fk x ' ~ 3 .b?,'~,~'i' ' 'coy _ `ct.~€ds' 6 z ,.;."u : Mr. Low reviewed the staff recommended changes in Option 2. These ~y^ < - T z . , ii = yt" ,k ~ V r~ Z. included decreasing the $83,000 allocated for the visioning project to the revised f ~ ~ - ~rit , .`,E,': $55,900, increasing the general fund by $55,000 for the feed store improvements, ~ I E-, r ,~,-~t Y; and increasing the capital projects funded by the state gas tax revenues. . , , ~~-s ~fi Mr. Lowry pointed out that the Council was limited to a 10% increase of~ - appropriations in any one fund. He stated that the changes to the state gas tax - M x fund put the Council over the 10% limit, and therefore, he has drafted a x x r: ` -s ~ commended using that took tbud next 10% fiscal hear; ~ ; ~ I 4~r, re g a supplemental get during the y (July) to - , s - s r - allocate the remaining $118,000. -3 tti ;5 , # 06 * l?' Councilor Rohlf asked if using a supplemental budget would use up the 10% limit ice- ~ , for next year. Mr. Lo-wry said no. Y °'K- - ` ~sf _ _3 - -2 11 (Mayor Nicoll left the meeting and returned during the discussion on Agenda s' jt.a'z. .t a` - - $ Item No. 6). ^,n.' t - ~ ' yr "F d. Public Testimony: None t M' t - 4 e. Recommendation by Finance Director: Mr. Lowry recommended that the , ~ z ' i ".1 -Z I t°' Y<r`!sr Council ado ",.L z - _ 1 Pt the corrected Option 2 budget resolution. ky ~ ~ ~ ajt - i z Y f. Public hearing was closed. - - , - 4 7 i h. Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 96-39 ~ , +rt 1 i Motion b Councilor Moore seconded b Councilor Rohlf, to a ' ~ " Y Y PProve Res. , I 4 No. 96 39, as corrected, Option 2. k ~ -"t I R J - y RESOLUTION NO. 96-39 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD . - ~ -11 3 APPROVING THE BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS, DECLARING - - - p w ` E_ i THE AD VALOREM TAX LEVY AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS G y PROVIDED BY ORS 310.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97." E ~s - Motion carried by a majority vote (3 to 1) of the Council present. (Council' i' President Hunt, Councilors Moore and Rohlf voted " es;" Councilor Scheckla g z ' I a" Y M Y c p' r voted "no.") ~ d Y f' - _ r - t Councilor Scheckla stated that he voted no because he felt that the money for the 4xt" Y' A. visioning project could be better used elsewhere. 4hj - 'JV - .t - xt f, k s t~ - x CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NNE 11, 1996 - PAGE 9 - ;1 4 w s t ~ 5 ~ K ~c,. (",Q&,;4 a r _ u $ « v e i t r- 'x r x `tom c` ~F a c.7 r { -ti & S, r 5~," , ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ - - - " ~ , , , J , - A - ,41t _ d 1 y - v!'y xv # t - V' , t,'4 1'L dap - 'Y'~` - - fir 01 - _ ~ 't - 11 t i - - s t rw t+ 4fr ..rte.. ......T" +w-"tC'. 6y ` ail .v - _ _w.. _ ......z _ . ..~.iz.ir~c.....- . n ~,,t•r, z-- „ - h ~ 4~ d ai 4 fad 9 - E ~ x - ~x t y -3- r - - } r z ~F a : 4 a G < ...u...•. 3 t} - f _ - .y as-.- 4~ 1i - ktq x t _ ' v a > $ s~ kt z 6. PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTa r * `c s PROJECT (CIP) PRIORITY LIST ;;w x$q~< x;• k . 4 - 4 a. Staff Report , ? Gary Alfson, Acting City Engineer, presented the staff report. He requested ~ - ~ - 4a F that the Council adopt the CIP update and approve the 1996/97 projects as _ O' ? „r proposed. He said that the CIP was approved by the Planning Commission on May 3, and that no opposition was received from the CITs following the - KW - presentations made to them. He noted that Appendix A contained the actual staff `4 - ^t recommendations for projects while Appendix C was the backlog of projects. . " : 1 Mr. Alfson explained that the CIP consisted of streets, storm drainage, sanitary r «z + vz r 3 ice} - sewer (all managed by Engineering Department), water (Public Works), and a _ parks (Engineering and Planning). z , x Mr. Alfson reviewed the process used to develop the CIP list, including ` f involvement by the CITs. He noted where there were funding limitations. He ' `-3 ;4a~ 9 R said that they took out the projects approved in 1995/96 that weren't completed 3§ s , ,i ""V c f yet to reserve the already allocated funds for those projects. t Mr. Alfson reviewed the projects proposed for streets. He reviewed the traffic e " ter a impact fees (TIF) as a revenue source, noting the that 50% of those funds had to € °4- C Y be spent on arterial streets. He said that the City has spent its 50% on major a' F collector streets and was holding the remaining 50% in reserve for future - projects. He explained the TIF Transit Reserve fund required by the TIF , u n program. These were monies reserved for transit improvements in Tigard; staff~~ L would begin discussions with Tri-Met in the next year or so on how to best spend - f ' 'i this money on transit improvements in Tigard. a , z I ` Mr. Alfson noted other TIF projects -right-of--way acquisitions at . ~ IJ Walnut/Tiedeman and along the cemetery on Greenburg Road, the , ,1~` Greenburg/Maple Leaf intersection, and Highway 217 on/off ramp improvements k ` , Z-1- li'll , a , _ at Greenburg. - 1 Mr. Alfson reviewed the projects proposed for gas tax funding. These included tee i k ' overlaying two gravel streets (Alfred and 74th) to alleviate future maintenance i` ~ ,ter - -i + st costs, Main Street pavement reconstruction, widening Commercial Street and r , ' j installing sidewalks on both sides, the Durham traffic signal, and the speed hump , . ;fi r b program. - b ~ t f _ Mr. Alfson explained that the funding for the City's half of the cost for the .;e' , n 7 Durham traffic signal came from the gas tax ($6000). He stated that staff W j ` y received a letter from the school district agreeing to contribute 50% of the cost of , , , the traffic signal. ~r; r 2 ~4 'L i CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1996 -PAGE 10 ; ~ Y -:214 I 11 , r° f d, j 2 Y, kz - - - I x - ar _ _ (F _ t1) CF - r- , - ~~`4""," ~ . , - . , - ~i~ ~ - , , r . I ~ I ~ - J~. , - l!"", , i ~ i- S r 't r a - - - - a e ♦ r l " , - , 1. , - , , - , 7~ , , , - t , . . , , ~ - i l.. f a _ - t 4 t^ r~~'~`yY~ _•L v_ .4. 73 s - ,f V h 4~ - x R - - k - ~ . - - I ~ ~ ~ ~ - : - 7" , , M 11, 4,~ K - a r -5 to- a- a # A ~ spa 3 _ - - " a ~ Mr. Alfson reviewed the Parks CIP projects, noting that major revisions occurred a S~0 reflecting the new funding received from Metro Greenspaces and the new parks a: r -$E SDCs. Projects included five natural areas, trailway land acquisitions, expansion ' ' ; ; e` Q = y; > : of Cook Park, and new neighborhood parks in the Greenburg and Canterbury f - f~ i ~F ' Y areas. He stated that a major unknown in drafting the parks CIP was the extent, t }Er r cost and timing of the Cook Park expansion. He said that the master plan would s _ .L M ' r be completed later this year., fi r art I- 3 -4 1 x` { Mr. Alfson ex lained that ".e park y P system funding was being reviewed to i -F determine projects for the next several years to use the Metro and new SDC r . 7 funding. He reviewed the Metro Greenspaces project list adopted by Council. V, - - i ` } `'v fi i s 4 _ #4 f _ 8 t ` Mr. Alfson explained that the sanitary sewer CIP was funded from three different k s~' sources. He stated that the maintenance fund was used for unexpected repairs1 needed during the year while the main fund was used for the neighborhood sewer ` - a~'` t } -3 - z extension program. , { t n z :-a., ' t Mr. Alfson reviewed the storm drain CIP projects which were funded from the - Z - ' , old and new SDCs. These included drainage improvements to Main Street and A Y , Commercial Street. He noted the restrictions on projects using the new SDC funds they had to be approved by USA and p art of USA's master plan. tz zz - ags ti -5`,y ' } r " However, he master plan hasn't been completed yet. °'r' "F~ 3 1 r r Mr. Alfson noted that the project list for the Water System CIP was developed by and th nterg Water ' the curretnt level ofservrieeetot Tiga de IHe said that it has Board t t roved tn Fr f4~~ ~ T` Y been aPP~t. t 1 by Intergovernmental Water Board. ~ 1 ky -.T, 3 E ~ Mr. Alfson mentioned several projects in the backlog that staff saw as having a~ higher priority. These included pedestrian improvements, traffic studies, and improvements to Tigard Street. i~ f b. Open Public Comment 0 ~ Sally Christensen, 15685 SW 16th, stated that she supported the CIP budget as Fs 1k s .sus. presented but noted that she had been given different figures for the Durham t} - ors N qe j traffic signal than what she heard tonight. r k~ ' z S x'~' ; Mr. Alfson explained that he had told the CITs that $50,000 would come out of 5 M 111, " ~ I r the TIF fund because at that time did not know if the school district would be ~ ' t- able to pay for half of the cost. He said that now that the school district has w x - t stated that they will pay for half of the signal's cost, the TIF funds would not be s t, 5 ~ t-~ used. b o r tx ` _ s d -i F_ t - Z .g f 3 , 7 " CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1996 - PAGE 11 A N I I s t r LL~L k--r a E. 4 { SL s { - ' m t F - r- -t P- T f 7 f ' + } - M - 1 x h E x ' z' - - d , -r!-~*,i~-,:~- 1 2 -11 f-1 - ~ - ~ - , ~ ~ " ,t Q , , ,~4 - I - ~ - , , I ~ , 1 ~ , I- I I ~ ~ I - J . . -qtr, E y - r c , fi K - F i~ a w - - s 4 :.ax Y ! f~-, - ; i t i L - > ~ ~Nz y - t`r E 5f-~ x n4 - - - t -rt, - Y, - Ar" " T 1as 5Z r-- -s gin"""' 'rt F _ S ~8 , 4 4-k - _ 3 _ xF ems. T2 fs,?--.,- i r, r-- .>'4.c--- < . "ma"r Sir u`• - "`);~i°rr.. lIl. : N%l f 3 , h r ti d f L - $ s jet £ t 4 Ms. Christensen expressed concern that the $100,000 budget for the signal was k less than the estimated cost of the signal (up to $145,000). Mr. Alfson - t , 4- ' " mentioned some work completed that would lessen the cost of the signal. Mayor s= Z -s'r tt c Nicoli explained that if the bids came back higher than the estimated cost, . Z k~ Council would find the money to make up the shortfall somewhere in the budget. i - 1.4 T He reassured Ms. Christensen that the signal would be built., t x r -f ; y ' Mike Marr, 12420 SW Main Street, member of the Tigard Downtown Business " r } n- x ~~-q > Association, expressed the appreciation of the merchants, business and property _ 1j owners for the improvements made last year to Main Street, and for those . £ ' proposed for this year, including Commercial Street. N i i t ,a= Burnham and Main. 0P_" ~ ac z- K Mr. Marr said that they were still looking for signalization at rz He noted a petition recently circulated (not by the Merchants' Association) i *,k commenting about the speeding, the crosswalk and other traffic problems. He k :r 7 - urged the City Council to signalize that intersection prior to 1998/99. } ~ r - ' . s of two good ' . - ; Engineers bs be, 11800 SW Walnut, stated that the Wes~sCentral CIT waslty d Y the Y Y• He . L ~ a M c concerned about the intersection at 121st and Walnut they understood from the a ~ N W~l 1, County that it was included in the MSTIP program for 2002. He concurred with ~ "I 11 the need to purchase right of way at the Tiedeman/Walnut intersection. ` z t r Mr. Bledsoe noted that neither of these intersections were actually in the City of x~ ";y' + Tigard though both were more than a mile inside the city limits and heavily used ( x f by Tigard citizens. He said Tigard should do something to improve those tfz ~~y intersections. He stated that overall the CIP showed good balance._ ~~a F I i , 11, c. Close Public Comment 4 { r < ' - si Mayor Nicoli closed the public comment. r ~ ~ ~ 1 " d. Council Discussion 4 rnn .lf Councilor Hunt expressed concern that they were reducing the major maintenance " + _ programs by 2510. As a comparison, Mr. Alfson estimated that the amount of ¢7s d ,Vg F- the reduction would probably be enough to overlay a length of street of about 3-4 4 x ` , ~ x - F f r blocks. - r0 , F x'4,5 [4 Councilor Hunt asked for clarification on the funding for the Durham/79th signal. ' Y r SS -M, r.: Mr. Alfson said that they had $43,289 from last year plus $6000 for this year ° 4`,.n i; ; which totalled close to $50,000. ~ 7 t _ t_ y -F i - g - #y ~t ,~'+S 11 ,1, ; CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1996 -PAGE 12 . ,F , ^ i ,..spa-... ..a..-_.....,_1J - , xk sTM 1 ` z*..*.- r _ t A 3 i ) f S _1~11`_, ~ 1, ~ ; ~ , ; ~ f", , . 21--l- J , a i J J _ ~ l k _ p } IIII"`` 3- } E ,~~,.f,.:, ✓ 5.. t a T q C K may. - ~i. ~r_ `.._.iv I, va. t__ r$. ~ c 1a- 4 t - - -Z; 115t rte,F i#' i -3 ~a - r r _Y a bra - k , - r r r.- - - " - In response to Council questions, Mr. Alfson pointed out that the paving of ,t ° t Alfred and 74th was a type of maintenance because it would reduce the ` ` ' - - r maintenance costs in the future. He said that staff selected Alfred and 74th i- ti purely from a maintenance viewpoint; this street currently carries more irafnc ,M ~ ` than a gravel road should. k ~a r r x a-- t; , - 1 Councilor Hunt said that he would like to see some consideration of reducing the r ? rT , ; , r„rt . f reserves on this. Mr. Alfson said that there were no reserves in the gas tax, only ~ ~ in TIF. r M zY In response to Council comments, Mr. Alfson pointed out that the longer they 'c -tt., . r Y- waited to maintain a road through overlay, the greater the chances were that the ~r road would require reconstruction, a more expensive option. He said that a four- } 3 iya year delay would mean major costs. 4# i 11 - Councilor Hunt asked about the accuracy of the estimates given for the projects.' 't-z L 5 Mr. Alfson said that the right-of-way acquisition numbers were rough estimates while the Greenburg/Maple Leaf intersection was a "tight" number. - 1 - - ' Councilor Hunt reiterated that he still was not in favor of reducing the City's , maintenance program. Councilor Moore expressed concern also that this was ~p t - stepping backwards. Councilor Rohlf questioned paving Alfred and 74th if it G - _ zx ~ "t r } n Y" F, 3 took 8 years to get a payback. t k - ~ 3 - i Mr. Alfson commented that the have already x Y1 r r they put a major effort into Alfred Street to get it to drain properly. He said that a 7-8 year payback on an overlay , -1 Li } was good. } s ` were rt commented 300 000 but at the same time nvestin~ sumt ofey ~ . I E reducing the g a substantial t 11 money on these projects that would save the City money later. Mr. Alfson y, ~ , ^ E " concurred that it was better to spend the money improving 74th and Alfred; . _ Rf gravel roads quickly deteriorate whereas an asphalt road would last longer. - { x ~ T yI ' fi - 4, 11 1?, a - Councilor Scheckla stated that overall he thought it was a fine list because it did y - , something in all areas of the City, allowing citizens to see the City at work. ,1= i t $ . Councilor Hunt suggested moving up the 79th/Durham signal and using r t , 7 contingency money to pay for it this year. Mr. Monahan said that it used gas tax x c' ' a ff money also. , f F''rz, - r" E,. -Y S1' -p k t N iu- 3 - '4`~ I ' Mr. Alfson commented that they needed to revisit the discussion on the signal to w ~ ~a i _7 see what the parameters were now. He pointed out that a signal had to be ti ' ~ . I d y.. c"' . c - 4 warranted at an intersection or it could cause more problems than currently - i V" existed. i r ! CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1996 - PAGE 13 ~ L_; ~i $ t5 l - S „ I M`,5 , f G - - i _ -+!+~u1fM 4 ,ey: i M- , . fY- f F 4 5?. rya #E1u'.r ~l?{` `1 - -01 , . , " - ~ - - - ~ : ~ - , : I - , , , - I -1 ~ , , - , . J ~ , - , - I - 3 )t Y' a'- x ,~V~, X~,,;~*~ "-;:",-;t" i-`,~":, L2 ~ ~ , ~ , ~ ~ , : ~ , ~ - ~ ~ i`,- ~ : , ~ ~ , , ~ " ~ ~ , ;r - I I , , - I k F _ _ t-CL IJ - -a'S-~~ 7s ,L. 5 - - 4,a F , sx r 4.e _ t } 1 4 t l --'1 Y F 1 F i j' l 1 ~ ` r- fC P "W \ I ~t _ _ - r- 2 -I - , .,J a ~._,.r. „:fG µ , s - i v le- , " ~ , : ~ : r:. , : , ~ ~ I , i - -1 , - ~ ~ 1. ~ 1 I . I . ~i ~ ~ ~ : I ~ , , t~ - -71 y - - 11 t as~W 4?he as s a . K - t s t K ti 3 ` Councilor Hunt stated that he found Mr. Alfson's explanation regarding the major w _ maintenance fund satisfactory and «ithdr- ` ~W iii objection. , wii Councilor Rohlf asked if the two projects proposed over the next few years for t ea the North Dakota Bridge and the project proposed for Tiedeman down to the ~ : bridge could be combined. Mr. Alfson said that it was difficult to gauge what 1; ~ - + , - ,;7 I they might do in any given year, especially with the amount of backlog that they had. He said that those three projects would probably cost at least $2 million. f , c ~ " - Councilor Moore asked where the money came for the Grant/Tiedeman project. , e~ Mr. Alfson stated that it came through the Highway Bridge Reconstruction/Highway Rehabilitation Program, in which the federal government l N- -fi 3 provided 80% of the funds and the state and the City each provided 10%. He 5 ` 'i r ^ said that the North Dakota Bridge received a little too high of a rating in the state a:, r biannual evaluation of bridge structural capacity and deterioration to make the list 4 for the federal program." - _ fa °as", ! _,Jt j Councilor Rohlf asked if the City had an intergovernmental agreement with the ` 4 ~ , school district regarding the 50% funds the district was to provide for the traffic N { ' signal. Mr. Monahan said that staff has received a letter from the district ,--A committing $50,000 from the bond; they could look into an IGA. Councilor t' - Rohlf commented that previously the district hadn't come through with funds on a `r K M,Nt project, and that he did not want to see the neighborhood disappointed. { Z' j ` e. Council Consideration: Determine, b Council motion, the Ca ttal Im rovement t ` ` 5 ~f by p P ~ Program for Fiscal Year 1996-97: - ~ ,V' 4 t ~a~; Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt the i~i~' ~ -=i=,t~3'q.- ' < -r h annual capital improvement program. 6 t ? ppFF 3 Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor M' , r Nicoll, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") - h~ 3 ~ t r _ r , y. - r - r 7. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT , x ' g & ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ABECO/Cox) - CPA 96-0003/ZOA 96-0005 1 - r ` ' T -,,---~~,j,-~,~,;-~~ -i " N . -fl -1 I., - REQUEST: Amend the text of the Housing section of the Comprehensive Plan by t , amending existing policy as follows: 6.1.1, Implementation Strategy 3 -modify policy 1 to include wetlands in the list of sensitive lands from which residential density can be E, transferred, and to remove the language which allows no more than 25% residential . - density transfer from all sensitive land areas. The application also proposes an 1 ; E. ` amendment to Tigard Community Development Code 18.92.030 to allow 100 percent N S , t- density transfer from all sensitive land areas. LOCATION: Citywide. APPLICABLE R ~ ) 4 FF s, ti - - ki ,1 L w - 9 .I I I f. t CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1996 - PAGE 14 m - { A A s "t" ` , ` S I J 1 P, L z 5 - _ :.5.. - f ( ~ J .7 k f - - - _ t f t',, ih, tt r - - r LX r - , L J r r ,4F' _ - i'v Y Z i ' n ,,t'~,,~ V f I f _ . L_ v 7 r~r .a:~ ...W r_ s.... _ r."~_."- -~.T.±- r__ _ .~_L , S 5 N r-', 1 _ 4 3 - S- 1 _ _ . 4~,IZ'~ ~y.+'. fY -'S --1 t i t if -°s5. . --a , " , , , , , " * ~ 1 - , " , , , ~ P, ~V ,-,r ;-,g, , _ 1 rr ,a - ° m - .r x 11 11 s !y E. Sly r3 :Y. 1`f aS' t F;' 11 1 - REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Coals 1, 2> 5, 6, i, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13 and ri ;a--t 14; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.1(a), 1.1.1(c), 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.4, 3.4.1, C ~ Y 3.4.2, 6.1.1, 6.2.1, 6.3.1, 6.3.2, 6.3.3, 9.1.2; Tigard Community Development Code $ rr xy h ¢ r Y _Y ~ r - F i chapters 18.3, 18.84 and 18.90. ZONE: N/A t ' , r e R d,` _ a. Public Hearing Opened r ` I1 ~y - i a - S Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the public hearing. ~ ~ 1:1 : rs 'fYF - y. , K S. J, k 1 a b. Declarations or Challenges: None ' ' , 5 C. Staff Report - s~ ~ x SF t r jW~ - :fin Nels Mickaelson, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He reviewed R. JA . t k the specifics of the proposal. He stated that currently the Tigard Community R - Y~ Development Code did not allow density transfers for wetland areas, though it yy ~ r ~ f allowed 25% on site residential density transfer for flood plains, steep slopes, and - , 4- •z - - L-1 11 ~4 drainage ways. He noted that this proposal had city wide application because it € -N ,t~,~ t 5 z a would apply to all wetlands zoned R-12, R-25 and R-40. Mr. Mickaelson stated that the applicant's wetlands study found 1.9 acres of ¢ ti .I per r b 0 wetlands on this R-12 property. The applicant was requesting an amendment to , L; x s } allow transfer of 100% of the residential units from the wetlands area to the ` S- x yw" - 11 `r buildable portion of the site. 1~~ ; .1 e s ,T~A e- r F Mr. Mickaelson stated that while the proposal met all the statewide planning , 4 z, ti,V . F r goals, staff did not feel that it satisfied Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.1.1 (c) ~ ~ i ~~;iI 'W~ II which required that the Comprehensive Plan and the Community Development , Code be kept current with the needs of the community. He said that staff did not ~ ~ u-t t, believe that the applicant had submitted compelling evidence that the policy L,~- 7 - should be amended to afford wetlands a higher density transfer than other ~'`M physically constrained lands. - , - -t~- ~ - r -.1; j - 11 , , p , kaelson notice the ap opriate that groups. NeithelrcMetro nor Ds hadflcomments but the South CIT had concerns about the ~ 'i 1~~ , ~ + effect of this proposal on existing neighborhoods. He stated that the applicant ~ --'~z s modified his proposal to include only lands zoned for multi family. The West ~ g p ~ ~ 'F and Central CITs questioned revisions which would allow more density transfer ~ ~ _ ,j f R r . - 'i from wetlands than other physically constrained sites while the East CIT - r R' ~z { supported the concept but felt that applications should be evaluated on a case-by- t , ~ n * f case basis and that there should be no guarantee of 100% transfer. gr ? , , sNy,I-- t ,+r _ I Mr. Mickaelson stated that the Planning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend s ~ x denial though they agreed that wetlands should be allowed a 25 % transfer of, x residential density. G ~t i ; CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1996 - PAGE 15 te--z Y r r b ya- t , -r 4 f 9 r Y - _ - t t' , v- F ,~,s-"-~R~-_ r~~.' ` " ,Z, ,,,~~!r~ , , , . I , , ` 777 . . I ~ ! ~ ~ ~ - "F "j, i, , f - y j sta '.'_i U I - L I , , 1 ~ i I , , . - , " " ~ , " Z. , ~ - I ~ L ~ . I , ~ ' j -:~C, 5~,i~~, ~ - 7 t - - - - :two' ; - - - ) t, ~3- 4" .1 'rY 0.l - _ „3 2 S t '~T I f _ _ - WT i J, ~l k Y . 4 r _ v > Pl t f s j (y P - w t, - I 1 .r-F - a 11 $ - i - - I "t"ai r , - ~ - - I -F aya.....iffi -I r__ .-♦.-u.~__~C - - sr...: ti, ~ ~ _ - ~~~F ~ ~ r - ~~z~"` ' ~.,s,fr v~ ter- - - t k art--'wa l r- ~ ~ _ - ~ r z~ 3~ - ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ Mr. Mickaelson recommended that the Council deny this application as proposed ~ z ' x a ~ t,er?t~ce the applicant has not met all the applicable criteria and has not made a k y~ f rs~~, _ ~ convincing argument that this change wouiu be b:,net'scis! to the City. He also ~ r i- ~ recommended that changes be made to the Comprehensive Plan and Code to n f allow 25% residential density transfer from wetlands on all residential land, not ~ ~w~ ~ ~ ~ just lands zoned for multifamily. jV d. Public Testimony ~ ~p~ -~s;1 z William C. Cox, attorney for ABECO, 0244 SW California Street, Portland, e - ° , y z ^ ~ f _ - - t reviewed the history of the application. He said that the applicant came in with a k, K _F S r: proposal for a density of 12 units per acre and was told that he needed to subtract P Y ~ ' the wetlands from the net figure. He stated that that requirement was not in the x-- z ~ '~+K ~ Code and that the staff did not know where that interpretation came from. He ~ t ~~h?~ ~ , said that staff also did not know where the 25% figure came from. He argued } r~~ - that it was an arbitrary number and that density transfer should be based on the `ti ~ design and nature of the land, not an artificial number. , - ~ ~ 3~~ ~ ~ r'' ~ ~ t ' ' Mr. Cox stated that the requirement put on the applicant to explain why his ~ ~ z ~ _ * _ application should be different from other sensitive lands put him in an untenable ~ £t * ~ ~ ~ position. He reiterated that they didn't know why 25% was used. ' + ~ ~ ~ e ~ ' z Mr. Cox stated [hat this proposal benefitted the City in increasing the density as ti ~ y~~~P> s ` required by Metro. He cited the North Plains case in which LUBA denied an 2 ~.s'~;-~~ , ~ s `h~' amendment to the UGB because the jurisdiction had not done everything it could r ~ ~~~z ~ x r to increase the density within its current UGB. } - ~ ~ ' 4 14 ~ ~ Mr. Cox pointed out the responsiveness of the applicant to the neighbors' ~ ; 4 concerns. The neighbors asked the applicant not to transfer density off all ` ~ , ~ ~ residential lands but to limit it to multi family only. He noted the East CIT's ' proposal to review applications on a case-by-case basis with no guarantees of r ~ ~ x ~ 100% transfer. ~ , ~ ~ s Mr. Cox explained that they used the term "100%" to allow them to transfer the r k ~r~f'~'~~' g~ amount that they would normally be able to build on; 100% might not be ~~~~,,y.~~~ ~ - accurate. He said that he doubted they could get 100% because they were still 5 ~ ~ ~ t ~ , : limited by the other building requirements which would bring down the total ~ ~ aft k ~ ; ` s transfer. He said that it was really based or. the character of the land itself. ~ 'x~ ~ . t 3¢ r3 ~ t ' k Mr. Cox stated that he thought that the East CIT's position should be adopted `g t- , ~,r ~ ` a here. He said that they felt it was a fair and equitable thing for the City io do ' ~ ~ y , ~ i because it allowed an increase in density in the Ciry while still protecting single z ~ ' ~ ~ family residential. He said that staff's proposal did what the CIT asked the 1 - ~ ` applicant not to do: transfer density off all residential, including single family. ~ ~ a~~ F ~ , Pe_ He said that was why staff's proposal increased the number of units allowed on ~ - A„ i~~ ~ p~ a buildable land to 389 units. ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ - z CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE il, 1996 -PAGE 16 V,- ~ ~ 1 ~ F ~ -2. 1 r s r ~ rr 1a x. ~ ~ f 1 - ~ -4 ~ i { ~ I ~ h, Y 4 ,4'M ~ . { _ g. ' r 1 Y r ~ 5 ~ ' J 3 ~ Y` - ~ ~ ; 4 S5 il~ ~1,5 Pf i } 1 T ~ F - i. 'Y f ~ 2~ t - ~ K ~ r d ~ _ i t 'a ~ ~ T ~ f - - - ~ - s r` I M 417- -7 +..t.~...q r x _ - _ k t" n 4, 1, 4- 4~ I 111 I ,q ME- -^'k.,q. . s - •4 r 1" ~g ,JN f 1 w k t z vp Vc^v~n'.T3..'tea,-cg. _ - y? N_i XR.a k'~ - a ~~g .asl -'.xrd 1 -f'-~"`zV- ..._.-z....-.~.,.,..,,_..._ v:. .......«,.~...wa., ..z~.~'. r~. - _ 'F---_ -ez k , 0 _ , ` .r7x' of r"- , 6 k, a~ I - y} , w s -P - , a st - Fi ~ Mr. Cox stated that their proposal was "a modest proposal." It did not conflict t t ' j ~ , ~ g l 4r i-a } with the community's desire to be oriented towards single family homes. He said ~ s _ a , t * } r r that their proposal was not negative. He contended that if the 25% parity was _ - M - , - - necessary, then they should find out why the 25% existed in the first place. He 4 , - _ y } _s__ r_ _~s..V _ - ' -4 = suggested striking out '100%' and simply saying "density transfers from zs wetianus should be on a design ability basis", as suggested by the more ` Mks kx x i _ # knowledgeable people at the CITs. The character of the land determined what 1 w - £ . r c t a= could be built on it or not built. i us e r 1 r as Mr. Cox contended that to require an arbitrary 25% without characterizing the 2 ~ s k land in any manner was not justifiable or supportable. g - „ . "K-.1R- , ; Mr. Cox said that he did not like the staff's proposal because it did what the ~g z , Y, y neighborhoods did not want done (transferring density on single-family land). } " 1-11 r _ The 25% was not justifiable. Staff tried to push the burden onto the applicant by r v~ I i , i asking him to justify why they had to be different from flood plains and slopes. Mr. Cox said that he thought the City could pick up 307 units which should help k ° in increasing their density and do it in such a way that it did not impact their Ua v single-family zones. s - ai 11 _ Mayor Nicoli noted that staff stated in their report that the application did not s satisfy the relevant review criteria. He asked why Mr. Cox felt that they have `~~r met the review criteria. 4; g::,~ I 1 ,2 t t ~ Mr. Cox pointed out that the staff report stated that the application did meet all -mot Y the relevant state wide planning goals; the only criteria staff said the application ti - ~ ° r did not meet was the requirement that the Comprehensive Plan/Community qi Development Code be kept current with the needs of the community. He said I - ? that staff agreed that this amendment would promote a more efficient urban form , x r n n F- and accommodate additional housing units. ~ l c- Mr. Cox cited the statement in the staff report that "the applicant has not F _ 1 submitted compelling evidence that the policy should be amended to afford - , . 4 wetlands a higher density transfer standard than other physically constrained r f; ~ sites." He stated that that was what he was talking abcut when he contended that J, 5,y p ' staff placed the burden on the applicant to justify the other land types. ' 1 f Mr. Cox argued that the community wanted single family residential protected. ,t -1 The proposal addressed the needs of the community, not only in protecting single- s ,3 - family land but in increasing the density as required by Metro. He reiterated that tR } he disagreed with staff. t - ~ ~ r;. F CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1996 - PAGE 17 - 7 c ~y 1 F _ fi i 3 a ,~r r -i~ r- ,~7 i 4 ,4x ~7";, r I ofr 3 - - - It ,a, 4 - x _ - Y d, '4~~',~,~~~~i,~~-;~,.ij~,~,:~~.,,~~~,~,-,,~ LL ~ ~ , - ~ , " I , ~ - - - - s - a - t x F k - F M1. L j f - 4 N l NM L l j 1 _ S y - -~r._ -i ,.:.e.....w.i ~ a- „i ...r -ice. _ r. _5_-. L'~.~.~-1[.._ _~,....1 7~- k x k:. g i ~ ,~-~~Ft,'.-~7, , ~ I- ~ - . I 11 ~ I- ~ I , - 4 , 1 ~z,'~t7fl, ,3a r ~ 0- -~W,!q~!91~~ ~ r-,-~, , ~ r p kS6 5~. Y 4 - 3[acx€, LUG - - 75_S- r Ia~, 4g S4 . " : > Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, stated that he agreed with Mr. Cox and t ' disagreed with staff. He reviewed the history of the 25% requirement, stating x , _ that it had been a compromise position reached to gain consensus from the ha ~,y y various interest groups during the Comprehensive Plan process. He agreed with , " limiting the transfer to multi family land, though 25% was negotiable. He stated ! VF ; that he was not comfortable with 100%. t ~ ~ z ~ -v" > Steven Topp, 12566 SW Bridgeview Court, stated that he was a land developer - _ T a nb. cu._y,..._ .ti .wrta. that ,1`1 be affn..re.l 1 b r/.: ,rey _ _ Sc.".... -:;".v,:•P .•~.-~^~:dF "w iu, this vn, n 5 cCiaiizin E_{-.,~.;;'r^~f; prop.. planner Y g In 1 ^"w:R=;i«",.. , - I "I af"s"' ;'i` ~ development regulations, and a property owner in~Tigard concerned about r`'rn B r~~.~ r' - lawsuits. He said that the concept to take density from wetlands and transfer it to 4~. y the remainder of the site was good, as was the staff's idea to apply it to all X; ' zoning districts; however the 25% was a bad idea. He contended that 25% ; - M-,- ",Z b I 1-111, 4 virtually eliminated all small development. He presented copies of the Clark ~F' rk, i # County Code, adopted six months ago, which dealt with the smaller pieces of I land in the residential single-family district. < ' ~n ; " r - Mr. Topp noted a discrepancy between the Tigard and USA regulations. He said R k aux.- - that USA required wetlands or a drainage place to be put in a separate tract of w' =;eC' a ' 3 I`. 11 xr rw. land at the time of a development application. But the City said that separate xh tracts of land couldn't be counted in the lot area. He contended that this would - - 1 ! K I ~ preclude development of buildable lands with wetlands on the property because s a f % c there were so many regulations there was barely enough land left on which to v M'-s r build a house. He stated that without an incentive to buy these lands, the " - wetlands were not protected. He suggested that the Council not adopt the staff t _ ~ ' recommendation and require further review. - , ` a cg'' > Mr. Cox noted that the testimony all supported the application. He stated that ~ K; ~ - 1.11 Beaverton had full transfer rights from wetlands and that Mr. Hendry x, x, who had - _ 1 ~ 1 worked for Beaverton, told him that he was not aware of any problems Beavert on f-nu~k F has had with that type of transfer. He said that most cities in the area did allow ~2, A~ 4`~ ' ~ = - the transfer. i , F } r e. Staff Recommendation r 1 ,P Y' 1 .r Y k 'k {fir Mr. Mickaelson recommended denial of the application and changing the - t Comprehensive Plan and Code to allow 25% residential density transfer from wetlands on all residential lands. I' f' k r f.Y Mr. Hendryx stated that staff did not simply say to the applicant that they did not r E I s know where the standard came from. He said that they evaluated the record, E , ' ~ _ though it was limited. He noted that the Plan was developed in 1983 and it was ' ° - ° ` difficult to know the reasoning behind the decisions. He said that staff did try to x a ~ 4 " _ - 11 r provide the applicant with as much background information as possible. I r. - , , , ~ _,1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1996 - PAGE 18 i " r - U r G F F At°-- r f _ - i 3'i r t. 1q 4 t' -'a u x --.+L s -Y ai ~.,41'i:~~ " L , , - 't 1 " , : , _ : ~ I I I ~ ~ I- , - , I . - , ~ ~ ~ ~ 1, - -U ,~~-_A -A' - " r 1. } fir' ~S` f F # v -1,1 t d$ - J .f - _ 1 - 'r 4 _ - I j ' } s 5 'Y i'- M` d {t J- 6~ r E L , , . , ~ 1 ~4: ji - f - I .Z - - I- i , ~ tz_~' U , _i , , , , , I , ; ~ . ~ ~ -1 Z-,~', ~ ~ ~ 1. , . . - -..r_ __».....,11 cC... - a....L~. d.• _ _4_..__ _ r _._a k I ; x'25- y% F k '{c- y~ tai: X13--- t - t - ? .t 5t z Z .p Y 't it C~ f _ _ } ' N I - 1 - c t +v~ ` rws r R `l ;FW 1 1~ - ' - tom' ~ ~,j, Y 1-1 Z. . i,.- ` Y L ~ t _ 11 ~r 1, ~ - f. Council Questions or Comments a 11 1 x r x -tip- x #S aC F-.., ,z ffl - r + r, 'w :l t; , ' ' i Mayor Nicoli commented that it sounded like everyone was in favor of portions i f,' - ? of this application. He said that he understood that staff thought all residential t % y t -r-,: ~"property should be considered but asked for clarification on staff's position on the ` ' - ,tom - ,,;25%. K ~-r z _ ' ~ f " - r_ y ~ ' Mr. Mickaelson said that the staff position was to stay with the 25% density _ s h transfer because it must have been justifiable to the community if consensus was t > reached on it at the time of the draft Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. He Z h ~ ` " - said that he was not aware that anything has changed since then, with the` y~ _ _ r ~ exception of the population increase. ~ , - ' ' a 3 , ^o, _ r- Mr. Monahan commented that in 1982/83 the Task Force was only trying to Y , F " r; attain the goal of 10 units per acre. He said that staff and all the interest groups 't <+,"`yam F a~ - r,,. came to the conclusion that 25% made sense; it did not add a large burden to the , " ~A - I .1 neighborhood and it wouldn't push up the actual density on a property to the , , ~ , ~ - extent that it dominated an adjoining property. He agreed that it was a < - ; compromise. He said that he didn't recall why wetlands were not included but he ~ i r . t 1 t-- did remember that flood plains were the hot issue at the time. ° ~a ~ . - , Mayor Nicoli asked if wetlands were recognizable in 1982, noting that the k ; definitions have changed since then. Ms. Newton concurred with the Mayor, E 4 -l stating that very few wetlands were identified in 1982/83; flood plains were the g 1 community issue. R , E _ ' In response to a question from Mayor Nicoli, Mr. Hendryx stated that they still C- a N . had the same standard of an average of 10 units per acre. .x 1 " 3 , 1 ~ - _ Mayor Nicoli asked if Council was allowed to make changes to the application- I w j without it having to go back through the process. Mr. Hendryx stated that there : 4, ~ , Ni were noticing problems if they made a substantial change to the requested amount ' a of density transfer, although they could approve something less than what was r 'y . Z,s requested. ¢ tz rx r~ , a Councilor Hunt asked if the staff made its decision because it was trying to { ~ j~ 11 comply with the current rules and regulations, though that might not necessarily ~'W'- jr ''i be what staff wanted to do.a F ' ?e ~r k . Mr. Mickaelson said that he thought it was more staying within the 4`^ e f ~ T Comprehensive Plan; there was no regulation that said 25% was the magic" r, number. Mr. Hendryx commented that it was also a consideration of equity. f> x` They had a standard that was applied to several different resources, and staff x , - ; questioned one resource using a different number. He confirmed that there was ! - rr.,, , no reason that the other resources couldn't be changed also. `w/ r _ _ CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1996 - PAGE 19 - - F - rT F.ysr.t..w--• ^sr't,:_'^' ( .L',xY'!':4=•...•.,+s •w - r 4 XY Yh" + LL z , ~ - - - , -i I - , . ~ ~ J , , -L , , 1~ - : : : , - , - ~ I., i -,:1',.-, 11 i 4 - -15 . f - } I - r i YyIG ` J - - - t F r ..t r - 11 M ~ ~ - ,1 , ~ - - ~ - jr~ - ,.1, e ~ , . , - _ - - .e__._. _ s. z_ ..x _ W - _ - l , z _ _ . r .1 I + - -~'-q i - - - - - a ~ - a F t an {fit"- 3- 4 4s c- £ x etg"A 4-$.". t.k A - - r "3 --y< _ [ qev h A.*3'Y . y s ` ,-1 -fit ~ - , 10 ` ti 'Fi _ ` k x fplE, 5 {t~i - s X, ~r v g ; Mr. Monahan commented that it would be a more equitable review to consider all ' t~ x l - the sensitive land types at once if they wanted to change the 25% agreed upon in - , " - ;a fii,'-Tr * t...~ 1983. s t F Councilor Hunt cited Mr. Cox' statement of using a design availability basis rather than a percentage. Mr. Monahan said that staff could look at design - 11, availability basis since it would be some kind of a performance-based standard. - ' Staff could try to develop criteria but they needed a definition for staff to work` _ s with. ti 4V- = - , Mr. Hendryx commented that the concept was that parking, landscaping and ~ 1 $ _ setbacks had to be accommodated on any given site. The higher the density, the =r. - _ more physically constrained the site became. ` , { € } ' Y ~ . ~ ` ' Councilor Scheckla commented that if they kept building in wetland areas, soon " ,V- there wouldn't be any wetlands. He stated that wetlands should be protected (as ` r was decided on in 1983) and that developers shouldn't be allowed to build on ~ ~L ERR, - c them. t x it 3 S 'd.. Councilor Hunt asked if this would make any difference in protecting wetlands. E - - Mr. Hendryx stated "the jury was still out" regarding the impacts of development ss u next to wetlands; the national studies were not conclusive. . ' YZ~i T~ W to & y a g. Public Hearing Closed P`A. c~ f it F . y. ry r 3 Mayor Nicoll closed the public hearing. f z- `S k ; It. Consideration by Council: Motion to Direct staff ti ~ 1 . Mayor Nicoll stated that he was in favor of the applicant's proposal. He said that = 7 if the Council approved this, they needed to review the other three categories. , A 4~ t' = t - - Y LfTM„~a - - 1:1 He said that raising the 25% to 100% didn't bother him. He commented that ~r over the last 10 years the federal government has taken much land from private { 'I € v~ property owners by changing the definition of wetlands and declari ng property ' ` 11 F I- I - ' ` ,x' unbuildable. He held that this would put some equity back into the equation. r gk'FOe;, g ~ i 1 1N - rt.a'- Z"' d ' r;' Mayor Nicoli commented that everything done in the past 5 years has been to 1 ~,ri," W.-3 ft ~ ~ increase densities and that this would contribute to that effort in a small way. He `'r _ stated that building near a wetlands still allowed a good quality open space around r * - rte' p, y - r' a development. He said that allowing a higher density in this type of situation K, ,4~ ~ , 6 5 x was alleviated somewhat by the large open area. i -i { € r1- ` fig, a Councilor Hunt concurred with the Mayor's comments. He said that he would i . s 3 x' z I like not to take any action tonight and to have staff to go back and change the ` -F aft - other three categories for consistency. , f . w CITY COUNCIL NtFgrgntG MINUTES nTr:E 11, 1995 -PACE 20 4, -t rol 3 ,,In ~ f - a4 F } -n s _ - 'z 1 d - - - _ - 4 - x 3's„a - F -st - " t 4 r' - - k it C 13 ` h R h;ter `k f3 p"~ s + -Y° \ _ J s J is t + "I ' - - r . - . _ K -1 e 7 11 ill i - - _ Y - - i7i _~,}~a a _ - vT:a' ~f{+ Y_'fy- Z -L - J.» - " tea,. " , " , z o~ - _ 3 i s - F s x'. s. _ _ `t h 4^ ) 3 11 -1 ' -gat , Councilor RohlF commented that he rarely found himself in complete i. { 4 ~`r x 'L { disagreement with staff. He noted the list of goals and criteria met by this ~ .1 application, citing that as important. He mentioned the responsiveness of the % § F,` a i applicant to the CIT concerns. He agreed that it would be important to change _a all the categories to be consistent but held that there was nothing "magical" about < ` ~ a } r wz _ the decision made in 1983; the Comprehensive Plan constantly underwent r - ' _ - revisions. ? s ° _ -'~a p~ Councilor Rohlf stated that this would help them meet some of their density . ~ ?-W;; ' ' onalc NP said that he nreferrrd the annlirant'c a_rprnarh of limiting the transfer ' Est a ~ w to multi famil land as o osed to oin e s s y y pp g g into single-family areas, citing the f tt , ~ > strong feeling from citizens to preserve single-family residential neighborhoods. , He said that he liked the idea that this would help them protect the wetlands ~P 1,, better than the current regulations, and that they could help the property owner "r = 3 get better use of his property. . Councilor Moore stated that he agreed with the basics of the prior statements. ` r ~~a i ' fl He noted that the question was what density transfer to allow. He said that he x~ r favored denying the application and directing staff to research the options, ' F "I ' , ' a Lf t including what was done by other cities. He said that he agreed that there should be some type of density transfer.' 1`"~ x ra x ` _ w Councilor Moore cited the comments made about restraints on the development of ~ ~ ' 'v property limiting how many units could be actually put on it, based on the size of G; ' _ { ~ the property. He said that the Code should not allow 8-9 stories for multi-family & ' 1 $ r units. He noted Councilor Rohlf's concerns about preserving single-family ' - rr4~ ~ , 'i residential. ` xY'*a t LT - > 'c. s•, Councilor Scheckla concurred with Councilor Moore. `Z _ I - Mayor Nicoli asked Mr. Ramis if they could legally make adjustments to the flood plain, slopes or drainage ways since the aPPlicant did not ask for an x , t adjustment to those land ~r i~ J types. Mr. Ramis said that he thought that would t, , r - rR,•~~zv^ _fi - ' require separate notice and application. He said that Council could adopt the , L - , L , Z a T proposal from the applicant and direct staff to come back with a range of options. e ' " -cam, t gar e s ~ ' Mr. Monahan commented that another option was to allow the applicant to F,: _q r withdraw his application and have either he or the City initiate a Comprehensive , . Plan amendment to look at the issues collectively. l " i Councilor Rohlf expressed concern that the City's lengthy process would impact ,!s "s 5:~N the applicant's ability to use the property. E P F 4 Mr. Monahan cautioned the Council that they were not supposed to look at s r Comprehensive Plan amendments with a particular application in mind because it U a _1 I CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 11, 1996 -PAGE 21 ~ ` ' i 5 - t x ix1 t 1.r0 x, ~I .11 7432 _ _ _1 F a' i r Y£ V i si _ i r - ~ ~ - ~ ~Z','_:`~! _,_'~1._",`, - ~ , , - , , , .,:r . J qi~,-,,-.,,-,-,,~, , , IL _ ~ . ~ ~ , , 5 _ ,Ie T'z' i• ra t ! l a t { 4 R d - - F` r 1 2 - I . I - t ~ ~ ~ 2 , , - . - : - - A ~ h } - - - - - J - - - - - - t }La t - _ $`C - -F # - - z - 43,5 ;1 4 a e Y a~ , i~ - 1 .Y t rvr -t - x 3 - i~-{- -x £ - - - s j_ a- t _ r -$t _ - - - I could come up to them on appeal. Mr. Ramis concurred but said that Mr. Cox 3 , t , r could speak in general terms of policy. ' x 'f ' t ~Yt~a ' ' Mayor Nicoli noted that the staff report included several comments referring to a G specific property. He questioned whether or not that was proper procedure. Mr. F ' Ramis said that the way to resolve this was to understand that they were addressing a policy question. There was nothing wrong with using specific - . ,r t' examples from the City to see how the policy applied. What was really critical s _ _ , , ` ' _ was the Council's policy judgment on a city-wide basis. ' ~ - . Rt y l The Council Pat, rnncrnc„c to reopen the public hearing. k` - gr _ Mayor Nicoli reopened the public hearing. t,, e -y xk " x, . ' Councilor Hunt concurred with Councilor Rohlf's concern about holding up the fry k ~ ~ ~ a project while the City reconsidered the standard. He asked what their alternatives 4 r ry 61 were. Mr. Ramis explained that in order to approve a percentage transfer on this ~ h• property, they had to amend the Code that dealt with wetlands, and then process 5 r ^~r~' T . ; 1 the request under the amended Code. He said that they could then come back a • ,,,a,,:.r- - , through a second process and reconsider the standard along with the other land types. , F ate - 4 41 -~x_ - ' V* % 9 Mr. Cox stated that he concurred with Mr. Ramis that this was a policy question z -f3 F - that should not be focused on one piece of property at this time. He suggested a r i short continuance to work with staff to find something that would work more on " Y. 11 - ` ~ ` , . ' a site basis than on a percentage basis, and that allowed a design characteristic of s3, 41X~ ~ , --~v - the land to come into effect. He agreed with the concern that it would take too ~&A, " long to go through the process, and do his client a disservice. He said that the g, q , MR I Council could implement on its own motion a study of the other types of sensitive - s~ y ~ 1 lands and change the Comprehensive Plan within their process. ; A_ a a r - - -i r t a as ` Councilor Moore asked if they could grant a variance in this instance. Mr. s - 'r Ramis said that they could not grant a variance to something that was not allowed _ x`, a<.~ ~ ,7 by Code. Mr. Monahan stated that the City has never allowed variances to v, 1 ti ~ ,s , r4 density, and that this application did not come under any of the exceptions. 2 -ter ¢ aa H Mayor Nicoli asked if staff felt that they could reach an alternative solution with 1F " t ~ ~ t 3 the applicant, in the event of a continuance. Mr. Hendryx said that staff could W ! 3 discuss different options with the applicant. He agreed with addressing this i, i x > ~ application separately and giving staff direction to evaluate the broader issues, as ; _ L it potentially would not hold up the application. ` " . { g t ,r ~ ar E Councilor Rohlf asked if there was something fundamentally wrong with the ~ concept of a design basis. Mr. Hendryx said that his concern was achieving clear r x, and objective standards and how to apply them on a case-by-case basis. tC t CITY LUiiNC1L MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 11, 1996 -PAGE 22 k 4 tf- k I z t, 4 x' t - .k t- .s - - L f r- Y - L ~ , , - y S° 3 a _ 5~ s ' a! r t t r LI- , z Y} iE 1 t ~ , , , , : ~ ~ ~ , , I , I , -1 - 2 - - " -,Z 2, t , _ _ y f - f • jj s _ - - - } - ik .b"` N - t E _ 11 3 "M1Z X _ _ 5 a` a f t* - - - U; i T 4! i 4.,5 ,ni ,x t - -I F r t , c- Mr. Cox cited the standard mentioned in the application, noting that they didn't esq. 11 L -y- `1 , actually use the term "100%." ~ - 'I C_ - - q - ,a °F, 3 ' Mr. Ramis asked for an example where the standard would yield a different result I ' ` ' ti.,- x« t'f " ` a than a 100% standard. Mr. Cox cited an exam le that fielded 80% of whole 3V" T, t j site. p y the - Mr. Ramis stated that he thought that they could come up with an alternative if 4 s' ' x ~ given time. He said that it would take some work with staff to make sure that it s . _ , t worked and gave the City some ability to regulate transfers in the future. wry„,`7 ; t 'i Mr. Topp commented that 100% was a simple number; any other number ~ ' 11 ^'a^ 1 T requiied a defense. •f u cy do.,ided to go :With comethina less than 100%, they Y f - I needed to have a reason behind it. He stated that the 80% figure mentioned by 4 z Mr. Cox has some background to it. He stated that if they adopted different =r-1 and were d fferentmthat would be diffigultf to do, then they needed to show why they t 4, 5 ~ z, ry ~ v - Mr. Bledsoe stated that he disagreed with Mr. Topp. He said that he thought it r i 4 - t. ~ should be applied to multi family. Y?F7°; s «x - w N= , t s i Mr. Ramis stated that those were policy judgments for the Council to make. If `e ,fe , f t r r they decided to go with different standards, his office would work with staff to ~ y' ' , develop the record to support their decision. ~ x~ fjs 5 i Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to continue the € ~ y .~,.y ri hearing until July 9, 1996 to give the staff time to develop a new 4 recommendation. r f, - ~ - 4 Motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote of the Council present. (Mayor t - . . . Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") p d F k F 8. CONTINUATION " ~ , (FROM COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21, 1996) OF PUBLIC - HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) -ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 96- '1117--, - " " a 1 , 0003- DEDICATION, RESERVATION AND IMPACT STUDY REQUIREMENTS $ _ _ - ~ - The City of Tigard proposes amendments to the Community Development Code Sections W F xrx#~'~ 18.32.050 B.5, 18.32.250 E.2, 18.96,010 A. and 18.96.100 A. and B. to require impact 3 Y~~ ` , r L & i study, reservation and dedication requirements for public facilities and services. , s ,_I ' LOCATION: City Wide. ZONE: N/A. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: ~r c~ I x - ~ Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 11 and 12; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1 a., 7'u", K~, ~ f~, .10 ! - I '~~%!f~_Io.-~ -;~,-~'-O_"~`;[ . I- . 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 3, 7 and 8; Community Development Code Chapter 18.30. , `~rs, ` ` _ a. ♦ Public Hearing Opened i r, r Mayor Nicoli opened the public hearing. t' , E k , - - m I*-,-`5 } _ r i yg h t 1 ATC 1 1 119996 ir E" t CITY COUNCIL iviEETiii^ iviii~i.iTca - .iJi~E i a, - Zvi: 23-.. ,.T„i..,, & L N r'- r _ Fps rt S - I _ 4 'i ~J f-"4 S $ 1 i Y J n - L ~ 5 T4 _ r , f - Y Z F } - ~-e I ~1 ' z 4 t ~$J y* * -N E k ! } _ ; ~ - ,N~ . I , " ~ I I I . . - I ~ - . ~ L~~ - I , ~ ~ -1 , , F _ - 11-11, , . i° , x - I y Y ° - > - _ ",a ,s~a„~, , . a ~..e.... ...i. } a rr iz3. N' l I r AR - ,,-.aY }G-- L `s'ue L~f 41 ~ijAl < 10 v --tom _r ~ a v ~'y b. Declarations or Challenges: None " gz; L ."rA } fy7 P X.„ a Y-Y~Sr, vGthvti. \ "7 '1 Staff Report Y~ K r -max- C. , ' , 7 i Dick Bewersdorff, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He stated that ~ ~ „max - a a~ y the attached order included only those provisions recommended by the Planning - 4« r r , _»sc , y - Commission that were also acceptable to the City Council, based on comments at x tiµ.~Yr, the last hearing.t r" t d. Public Testimony: None ¢ 4 ~ °r, ' r i e. Staff Recommendation I . - _as w_______° .a a Mr. Bemrsdorff recommended approval a written. k ' f. Council Questions or Comments: None s ~ m g _ - r g. Public Hearing Closed ~ ~N, j m~ C 3 " r.:n w~w~;y~~ - -j 5, y,(i.'''r'.:-:Jk`4^yA L^+' ii r Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing. t'~ -111 A ` llit, \ 4 t Z _ 7 - w I i h. Consideration by Council: Ordinance No. 96-23 F -f_ `vx q a x h s 'T Ordinance Nou96~23,Hunt, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to approve .."q g~ w r K The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. 5~k -74 , a ORDINANCE NO. 96-23, AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND PROVISIONS OF 14 D THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE BY ADOPTING REVISEDz , SECTIONS 18.32.050(b)(5), 18.32.250(e)(2) TO ADD DEDICATION AND m* ~ t ~ w f{ IMPACT STUDY REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND aa i r~~ K 1 SERVICES.i = r * Motion approved by a unanimous roll call vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf, and 5checkla voted "yes,") _ S =1 A:. ..mac n - 9. NON AGENDA ITEMS g h r ' 'egg«"a*~-,,~1 z N irk 7 > Mr. Monahan presented a resolution recognizing the efforts of Gene Seibel in helping' - x the Water District resolve some of its water needs. He said that Mr. Seibel was the X07 7 K. K Y, - 7_, director of the Tualatin Valley Water District and was retiring at the end of this month. r 3',y, ' , ~ x- - Y r~ „'f r } Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Resolution Xf K , E - Y{ ,gr~=~ NO. 9640. ri€" xYh i R,h - i - C dam, e ,xYrr, ..a"_a u. .-_L if }v J c.. t- fir- - CITY COUNCIL viEEi'livv MINUTES - iUi~E ii, 1996 PAGE 24 , 4' ~ - L t'~a c. u, - i - zr t atfy-'5a r 'y 411 _1~1 ter L YYS_t, t ~Ste. C.' Y 9- V P 1~ N. } - { K t -1 4ilf h S G { rt- Ashy, { - ^ x*~' £ { C gF f 1 le, 4R,r::.S - 1 - "7 Y- _ Y ~ ~ 7 4 r C 5 ` L 7°, ~ a a;:i u 3x r + X' w 1 fi € ?3 7 i ~ -~d J -€w,c_ vx - s r - -f - - - I e ~ 'S,7~. §TZ- a, 7 +ss t,. p 4 s - 7~ e - i ry? , 2. s *m 6 a a z 3 X a - x- a ~'r~ ~ IN qsl N L t y 1~ 1- fi,.'U'' x - a - `t .r x, _v.--.....,... _..._..-_..v..._ - "''~_,v }E'~Zj t- - ''A''*¢ " % - z r4- .rte' o s "ra - I ,}7 Y1 SF } i 1 b 4. '3 ~ r 4 'fit. p`2, za 1>6 . I ri.;i ~,:>~,r'.im ":y#a <t^ _ '.''`.''"''.ti w.s-~H +3ir`i''Y-n-'` wa~yti~a 4zs~ '',S~,' -~--,n~r't's~ -'_"°.ash d~ x , The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. r ' i v- t ' 11 's,' K :.~.S- 1-7,2:. 1"a= ,X- 5e t,- 5 3_ " ` _ ` RESOLUTION NO. 96-40 - A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL - r * _ ' ml-, : ` HONORING GENE SEIBEL OF THE TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT. F i r 4 r 1, ; ( ' r i Motion passed by a unanimous voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoll, 3 - 3 ~ Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") , k t a } -Y X r , ; v : , : > Mr. Monahan presented an update on the sewer problem that developed Sunday evening a „r „ i ` £ in the Ventura Court area. He said that sewage backed up into a local stream because' t 1x14~' a``:' 11 t z vandals dropped a 12-inch diameter boulder down a manhole. Although DEQ appeared 4 ~ F 't to be satisfied with the City's clean up efforts, they questioned the response time. The - Cis crev:s be , , " - a-s S- _ s411 MLb.411-11p ciLviw crt ir`lvuday moit;ng. Staff wailed because they did , Sys. -4 4,',10 NMNO, t not feel that people would access the stream at 10:30 p.m. (when the problem was * d ,c, W- r discovered). The stream has been posted with notices warning people that the water was s a - ~ not safe. ~ I. ~ 1 P - Ms. Newton added that the primary reason City crews did not respond on Sunday ? s s ? evening was because the manhole was located on forested property off Barbara Lane. 'w ,;'u„ ~ rv c"i.id Cir.. y , t The crews had to dig through the brush to get to it and that would have been difficult to f(, 4 ~,g,~_,t -y 3 F:,r,:v tk~~:",i7?V" 1.. ('rig do in the dark. The City was periodically testing the water and will removed the posted ji ~ waters when it is again safe. 1 e-~~ i 0--~-- s b viz ..]J-'-6$.rnzc Councilor Hunt commented that based on the articles and TV report, he had gotten the y K t a ~Y - ` impression that the City had exposed sewer at that location, not that a rock had been a a ~ , f z ~ dropped down a manhole. Mr. Monahan suggested issuing a press release explaining the remedial measures the y , , City was taking. He said that there were ways to lock down manhole covers and staff ' n t was discussing that as a future option. He stated that he understood from staff that this -~i y 6 r i was not an isolated incident but that similar vandalism has occurred elsewhere in the %A ;e r , Metro area. y }firms y I ~ F " ,r ~ > Mr. Monahan said that they would reschedule the election training. b`~ I I x~.-- - 5 5 glEl a R x- P l - e' yy f 4 f fist 1, 4.i s - Y Y A F~ t - f, - - E -rte S_ a.'~ } ; ~ 11 :z I 11 J g _ ~ rITY rnTTmr MEETING MINUTES - Ir1NE 11, 1996 _ PAGE 25 3 l-- 4~ ~,E &7 f I, 7=F . , - , ,~~-~~---~,L--7-7-7-'-~~~-~"~--'T 7 ~-~--,-,-~~~4,~---7--"~-7'~~"---~~---777777777 - - ~ i~'-`~,,`-,,~--_,~ yys ,y s''s - 3- s F kP x:~ f `i t = - 6 - - - ay , s f r - r, 3 Z Sr S - f M, £ F } a § t Fr x, "{.3 `en r - 3 x r' n rt F r, 1 t 1 # t° - t .M 11 ~ r,a_ s'r - - t n 'v. ,mss`'' C { c. f r - -Xfs i 1 a rrv 4„ t _ - j in - - ~ ~ .,r,, , ~ , , ~ ~ - ,r - " ~ ~ ~ I ~ : ; - . ~ I , 1 231i"' - I - - t - - y r1.i Y ~-1 ` iw•",t"- hrht `r' -k r»S-,mss ~Im , - - r - say° Ye"=s i - { - r 1 _ s t r k,- t--`h • ` Y.~~$` ~r r r'a a, t { a s r - x 5 y of - -'.y,,.a - - x- - ^z n "'-i r r a - - 3 ,'s`ad. ;r Y^`C d A--WIM-21. ~S f, ; x - S -r, F a - : -tx7"'r i r - Q, -`pip ~ - 7,3 a ~.a.. ._s~`.-ssx m:n - d ^=s gv 3 f y hw~ #3 t t . ~ "7 Y ~ r s 1' 11 fix ~ "1- r h n z sR? E f* r vtx'l.t i kk).3' s- °'~,z,',3tCa. s,G . 'a 1. 2 ; UNITY NEWSPAPERS INC.rry s ,-e; "n._s'4 _ COMM 7 Legal f; xpl ?~v;_: .t ekCEIYFu TT 8525 > r - a. ~ ,1 - P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice ~ -'fi'r ; I' - j t cl ; BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 "l7Y OF TIGARf Legal Notice Advertising 5 ryafi`~#~ °City of Tigard ° 13 TearsheetNotice ~xz ;k,, r~z'& -3- - _ _ 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ~ :S } 1 rf,.~¢ --4 ti s • 13 Duplicate Affidavit i. " Z. r 1~ 4 - 1. Tigard,Oregon 97223-8199 fr €a n s Accounts Payable:Terry a_ _ fi ks R - +mr o h-_. t" ` ! ~ a AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 1 r - , t ~`~Zr,- - STATE OF OREGON, )ss. - . I l ' , kt v, ' r COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) - SSS a . t L y'.-I,~ { r 1, Kathy 5n der 2x r i~ A Ti-' ~ being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising C ti ° - r : Director, or his principal clerk, of theTi% d-ma,a T at; rm;mes a i t a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 p ~ t ' -z ti and 193.020; published at Tigard in the k J k2 4,- a Ax aforesaid coon and state; that the k ~ -,kT~P.~ x i' t, Tl Q'ard C' y OUn i 1 BUR; Haas n7ac.+; nq - a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the b, T entire Issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: . ' [ A June 6,1996 % R vat d i t 1 Wit- s ,4 4,p r4 - K t 4 + Subscribed and sworn t tore me thi 1996 OFFICIAL SEAL sib T i ,Fa, . ' - ROBIN A. BURGESS r` g ,at -a , -1, ~ ` x{ ~ - - NOTAt', ' „ IC -OREGON I 1- ~ ' s ' t 52 y Notaryblic for Oregon MY C. COSSIO,J En :r1ES MAY $8 199' ~ fi ~ 4 ~r xr My Commission Expires: # a tR Y ' _ AFFIDAVIT - a - u a ii 4 .-I t 1 cwt - r „ 5 -z rr „d 5 ate, r y _11- t-i~"` rc i 6 k5 4°' T I' 1 v . 14 'L. I ,Z ~t#~" d%«- k 7' - , J` -v'j ~`t `rt2,? =cam` ; i t"V -tw .n. ' _ of yid-r s,fr 444 _ r'xs v 'e`d N~I t- - k ~,.`•"6 +>«as~++ ~.rTM~ aun+,ti^,~ f x's ^y.ar~r gyn.°,„"""",""'"--,1'~4°'r 1: d ii~, 77 7-7 gg ,V,' .~rs1, - r x z'# v x. - ` - a ? s-t"'i•`~ as' y , s- e h`~°3 . k'.Ls,.. wt-=: N - - M r 3 --,r' ~ . 1 2'. ,p"' .ry y i, - ms ; y x 5. . x y t r y, 2 r t j ft j ~~f,4q M P f-ter r f * f Yls ~ - 0 t xr.~~~,4• eax a _ F - s£ F z 11--', 1. ~ _ _ - I - - I - 't . I ~ I AYR ~ `fi'r ~k c-&} r 2 ~ a - ~ 14 - r " I - I I ~ . . I ~~;_r , " - ~ , , - 7- - r_.. j . F.. 1" t%uq =•t h k -mss ht t Y 2 ~ Sx ~L Xk 4 ~ ? E"- t { - i t N5 i { 4 fS . i E _ 3`- f •d S - hi j ! is are bushed for your information. Full . # - Tba following meeting hightigh publish _ agendas may be obtained from the City Recorder, 13125 S.W. Hall v Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223• or by calling 639 4171. _ _ . r3r # t CITY COUNCIL. BUSINESS MEETING * t ` i 1, s x June 11. 1996 , TTGARDCITY HALL-TOWN HALL ~ - ,,1 r 13125,S.W.HALL BOULEVARD:TIGARD,OREGON _ r ~ . ~ Study Meeting (Red Rock Creek Rootn) (6:30 P.M.) o into Execu- n f • Executive Session: The Tigard City Council may g T Q five Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (f)• , 4 (h) W discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current K. and pending litigation issues - Wetlands Policy Discussion r - tr Agenda Renew p- own Ball (730 P.M.) 4 Busii- Meeting (T ) z ~ , ? ~ " t a 'w Council Update/Discussion , 11 I— j y . _ -Update on Tigard 11 P1$Y1tC p0ffltnitytoCtNnmbnt - ~ aT~~ k _1 • FlvYear-capital Int vententPmBratn,- 5,6 v~ l ~ Public Hearings: ~ - - 1996/97 Budget Hearing a-- # • Election to Receive State-Share Revenues s , • .Hearing continued from May 21,-1996 - Zone Ordinance Ii z ~c , - 11 Amendment (ZOA) 96-0003. Dedication, Reservation and Impact , - Study Requirements- - r • Comprehensive Plan Amendment-CPA 96-0003 =Wetlands 3 i ' - ~ 1 . , ~ t ,-Density Transfer 4 Y F MM - Publish June 6, 1996 tt r r' E x i Fr ~a ' , tl ~-7 z y s `1 4 f - i s1 t { r P' CC 5. Fk `y.1 - , X • 1 _I 11 rs, j A q - j # _ _ h Y i of - _ , af_, 1 I - f t p~ J `.i T 5.~~ -•~~fa 5... t. - ._S~_ s~:t_I '1~_,__ ~LJ\. C..._ .a .t_,- ry.._..1-i. j, a. r _'.}..a. .:..a.L 43 s w W - - - ~ - - - - - V3 % -`i e n srm r, F11 -,7: r ~e'~'--". , ~ f~'-'. , I , . ~ -"i f': ~ - - , ' - , - : , ~ ~ ~ " "t~~ , 1,1. , , _ _ - ! - - r d ~;t V }k or s I .11 v D h A4-n:'~`' - g - ! w-ii'' ""§''a,.t,.ra 'YC'§"' bc.w- - ...~.2naYst+hus.m - „ { s T`-V'y~,'E'+-.-~`, x y` _vlo ~w"'i'~-~`B-~" t ~t`a tea, 'e ,3 3 gsS~'C,A' tri i4 ad! rit 4 -!«-K S?~f'~ 3- e' , PWI z e E i vGQM11flUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal r 5 - 'F Y~ 4rI-a& - , - OX 37v PHONE (503) 664 S r` sz ~ ~ oz, .0360 NOt1Ce'T"T' o i o q 11 =1 P.O. v , ((w <j 19% BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 _ ,s xA5 ue' 'a 5 a~ - 5, ,'ki'p`; i - rx - VK~IM ' ` as t .:!IY OF Legal Notice Advertising ik di ) r - -i +~t.~ TIGAkC•a'3-are-' o- - x _M i x ','s "City of Tigard • 13 TearsheetNotice sa La- 77,, ~ il ~g k i 13125 SW Hall Blvd. j a I a a e ~4r , k- j °Tigard,Oregon 97223-8199 • 13 Duplicate Affidavit 'c a z I ~rrty _ < I ,Accounts Payable:Terry • 4''ir,, 4 # AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Y~~z~ ~r r _ STATE OF OREGON, ) r COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. , ; - - - -p - Kathy Snyder "J` ; f being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising ~ a 4- - Director, or his principal clerk, of the r; ga rA-m„a T at i r mj mes4~ rn,x a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 1' ' t11 . - r a s and 193.020; published at Tigard in the a~„1 '1>~ ~ ~iil N F + ' aforesaid county and =hat the rn~ , sza' - -7a 96/97 Budget M tin4 ' V Y? t a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the A u 3 s entire issue of said newspaper for_ONF successive and } n f + x consecutive In the following issues: r i I _May 30,1996 s", ^ s : , , i ' ~~~.~,',;--~.,~~,r~~-,,~"",~l',---~,~~--";" ~ ~ 44~ I [ y 0 v1 %-g3 - E k" , . ~'!~W~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ! - F Subscribed and sworn/11 before me this 0 f a 19- L W r OFFICIAL SEAL t (~G . N'ta a; i+ ROR;t? A. f34?RGESS y . /Y NOW r °l., -OREGON S r P No Public for Oregon . COfAt . : p. 024552 MY Commission Expires: f1Y CC,.oS10;I Ent';RES MAY 16,1997 t fi AFFIDAVIT nk I ~M By 3 _ r ! x The City of TJgard City Council will hold a hearing on 7--- -71 luns.ll, r % r;' ` -19 " I f r I9gb to dlsouss the 1996/97 budget as approved.by tbe'Budget Y - " , ` - s ~ ' ` Committec:'Tbe_meeting will begin at 7:30-P.1-', and will be held at . „f r { i £ Tigard Cityy Hall,' 13125 S,W: Hail BOuf.oard. Tigard, gg ,s,a 11 z~ 3 E noticeof the hearing;and the Financial Summary were obi bed in the M g x -L I - Tigard oobtained Times onThutsday. May 73.'1946: Tho' Budget may be instPeted "e- s "111 „ , tainedat Tigard City Hail between thou501!8113m ands gA 4'~ ~ ° <'The CityColncat at dieichme l l " 1946, meetiri 'k g be gr•nning at 7.30 m 4 i rd s , 3 - f 'w.1 will also hold a pubhc.hearingaa the use of smote revenue sharin funds 4 c z ' An l ItIZC714 wisnm are , f V s Y to comment an the use of staterevenue shazing ' k 7 - Fn > en,r,. - ed W Site!?- - ~ y r r" r 7'1g3Ib Publish May 30,1996,' a 3 r ' ;ri s , h ?cur', } ~ a - - ? - tr" ~ ~-r g i r i 11 - _ - _ _ ,rte'Via. - u'- , t ' ? ri 4,, 1 r W i v- t _ s ~.,r r--' - g}~, r~ _i r v 4 , - a pp - t - - v r S €`5 " a A .Y,A CRS 3'"' f kn 1'..'''' Yr~ r n5 x' z , ~ ri _ Tg - ti -i - s. J kt ~'r t i L u.i~s,-. v .v,_-. tS ._..i__.... ~..x~~._ c..n t_, _.v 1 _~.r S_, --v .-...~_l ~.~x ...ii:, ~ i .--s~. : ~~1. Jd£yy< 4d *a Y '7 t f - Y t' y. Y` _ Y g dt { i 1, a > f F Y CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON ~ ~ - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ;A " FziZIT --f}< ar - kTsa,~a~ c 'T-- - s"i ,seJ~`15'~ce In the Matter of the Proposed ' r } { x s " + STATE OF OREGON ~ County of Washington ) ss. it City of Tigard ) Y~,I - - ~ ' . - ~~►y f t ' " a I, fU1[r ~Q~ 1 l 1 /1 begin first duly sworn, on oath, c I ~ r' - depose and ~Qr S , ; P " ,w tt-": $ 4 _ Sv- ~ ` `N r That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance r µ Number (s) j A"M T's which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated kt q b copy(s)~ ~ ff, t- of said ordinance(s) being h eto att ached and by re erence made a part hereof, on the _ z j ~ , - ' n r, day of l1)t~9 , 19_7f¢__ W'> rat c v e 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon ~ f} k I F~- t ? q ~a#F war 17 ^ 11111- 2. Tigazd Library, 13125 SW Hal! Blvd., Tigard, Oregon F., { ^o-~ 1 } 4 V _ r F 'k ' 3. Tigard Water Department, 8777 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon f; t F L . . . )~S g ~"V4~'~-~.`,y`~~~" ''.'~:'~:~4~ a_ " ~~'t ~-F'K.';' . , S~ , . ,-,L~-.-i,t~~~;,.,-.-~'-,~~,',-~,~.,~~~,:;-""~l"'-~~~ ' " - - . - M-' Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 19 !6 ti w - ' r _ OFFICIAL SEAL t - frr' n ~ .c' FF x~ -1 11 DIANE M JEIDERKS NOt Public for ry5PX-- E 11- - - NOTARY PUBLiC•OREGON a gOII - ~'-""2 0 COMMISSION NO 0:5142 r ~ g - y- d MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMAER W. Y999 _'a-f s,: - L~' My Commission Expires: ~ r k zl~','~'-'~,',~~,,I,"*~~,~'~~'~-~-~~",~,~'-,~,~~ 'N'--',~ -4 ' - I F + r F y7-1 P` -i d 1-- L> , ~ klud-1jM.ffpw.dx c -mow. pp 'y,r _ J r'd'l't - 'f' - 4- xu Y l YI ' W a , 1c F ? I, ~k 9M k Y ~ , a P [ "'~~"'<'.N*'v,- ' ~-7 I - " - n z , _ C' 3' Y k fi ; - i f d 5a # - - , , U , . , _ ~ , , - 1 k t k fi ,r t S ..x 2( E t { J k1 y 't r € ` , ,1' i _ - Sri - ' t rte. 3~~ 4 a E z' ` I' - l ; Y 2 ' F . V 7- - - : " , , , , - - ; ' . : 4 ~ ~ I 1. , , F E t , ~ L : - ~ . ~ I I I I ~ ~ ~i~'; Z~' , F1" rf: _ §ih~ 3.1 S wf .Yi'k'f[ J MAN ""mss.®`E 3 s,+:a ~a "-~".•~~ar~cz~r Ott, -w.- F r, ~ - ) yri 2~°~~j'sr "v` yy ybh Y - - t - / - 3 _ - { -Lt d -P.{3`".'4..*'[ 'ai' t ~4 ' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON "mac y , . ORDINANCE NO. 96-~ 4r rr - AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE CITY'S ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES ; A t>{a`s k XA ?N gk' r t k THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS : ss f~ r SECTION 1: Pursuant to ORS 221.770, the City hereby elects to receive $a}_ = z = state revenues for the fiscal year 1996-97. ',A"` .s IRA, 02% This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by they " Council ¢at v n z$ signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City* Recorder. !r W~ Unan'imous~~~ t . - PASSED: By vote of all Council membe s present ' after eing read by number and title only, this 1 day y~ s~ Tf # a ` of A-4 rv , 1996. t a, r , Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder A APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of 1996. dLt~z /,/Y x = { Jame icoli, Mayor~~o }t a K - _ e Approved nrill x x as to form: City Attorney s 'I~ Date r~.~r'Xti Y _ g s ' a- I certify that a public hearing before the budget committee was held es; ` R Y April 18, 1996, and a public hearing before the City Council was held on z, June 11, 1996, giving citi ns an opportunity to comment on the use of~ ft , State Revenue Sharing. iU ~~_yy f asp Cat Brine Wheatleyy/ City corder y m Da e~ Y,'fJfS'." Y ,J4 3 _ t' a'vsl '.u~ --y5'`y,° ~ks`~`^ ~y u -x" sx ~ d r 'nt a'S ~ a° a ~ ter; s 4 ~ z.,.rvtH ~ -Y I OFwliviuvCE No. 96- L. , C § Page 1 M } i " `x 7 „rr€a cry s e a. too -M -17 atrt` to -k. X -1 - zr Js - - _ r! _ i - rh ti- `iz a y"•r'`s. rY„,kyt a; t 3 - - Imo' a f'M 45 t £2v'tt," t c€ u 1 TM.,'Y.~ ~..v-..---.,,...r-°._ r' _3`_".""rr---=."' -a-r^..+.:-+xw-- "'~`„"~'°z'. _ "^`-r~.-.t:r ..r - } 11 A = .1 ~~f~ . ems t~'' . f, ' 4 _ - - - ) $,s ,x t - _ ,nab. ktE-F rs x 5 x r - r - - ,h a M-c ri„vs - _ 333 - aka-°'ayfi.- {t 7. - t*,. t } ` }tA ~ fit. 'e'~$' - a n _ sr x - ~ Y - „a'>m iKi Y.k i^'F--~"r m4 S- F 5~ i 3, k k 4,11 --t - te a :w, T i - s} M} f h' , tJ S s ue-, ?Pt., ? y _ ,I L CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ~ s ,i~4~ - tN M "gg ORDINANCE N0.96-0?3 a _ > e s - J AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND PROVISIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE } BY ADOPTING REVISED SECTIONS 18 32.050 B.S, 1832.250 E.2, TO ADD DEDICATION, y 5 r } I r,_ AND IMPACT STUDY REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES. _4` r ` sf . tz _ -n s t t uWHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise the Community Development Code k fsa i N- ti - - periodically to improve the operation and implementation of the Code; andf ss¢ '411 - F {it F rFt,. r SY ? r WHEREAS, the U.S. Supreme Court rendered a June 24, 1994 decision concerning uncompensated x~ a~ g P - < , - takings and the need to justify dedication conditions by showing a "rough proportionality" to the impact of - ~ r - - development; and T ' sks , WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Planning Commission reviewed proposals for revising the above Code l ~ ; ,11 - t, 1 N Sections at a public hearing on April 8, 1996; and ' e ~~.1 1 - r ~ am : x x L "4 WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Planning Commission voted to recommend the revised Code Sections as 11. ~ ,V shown in Exhibit "A", and "a V ~ "r WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearings on May 14, 1996 and June 11, 1996 as well as a work ' r'. 4 k~-;"~-~t . I- t 0 session on May 21, 1996 to consider the proposed amendments. ` , ~ N - "W" I -,r NOW, THEREFORE; THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: - ~ `1 I ,sq~r i SECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria as noted below: t 11 The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 11 and 12; City of m~ ~ ~ Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies l.l.l.a. and c., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 3, 7 and 8; and a . Community Development Code Chapter 18.30. g,, }I - € 1,_ , The proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals based on the r T ' following findings: ` < < r F ~ ' pr. _ I5f Tc V* ' Pe r r ✓ r 1. Goal 1, Citizen Involvement, is met because the City has followed its adopted 1 -3 1 - citizen involvement program which involved review by its Citizen Involvement t ' Team structure, and public hearings as listed above. The City's Citizen Involvement F r Policies in the Comprehensive Plan have been acknowledged to be in compliance 'ri ~F 'IZ a with Goal 1. Notice for all hearings was provided in the Tigard Times which ,3- _r 1. - ,--W , t:~i7'1:111 p ;ir summarized and outlined the amendments being made to existing code provisions t k _x and was done so for each public hearing. Copies of the ordinance drafts have been c j t $ e r ' available at least seven days prior to the hearings which follows Community * Development Code Procedure. ra , w b I p 0-- ORDINANCE No. 96~3 I r Page 1 z i pr "b4 -w.s'lu>~~ c*a.-w5-n~ am".ren { r,~ r 1z Sil' 5'~ 3 , a w ~FF 4 3, i S N k- 4'" P y - 3 4.U / ~,`F'ky.Y qi E 3- t- `-k k. r rt -r r s s - - - E ~ , 11-1-11-- 11 I - - ~ , , , ~ 0~ l F , I K r - f3~ a - x ,,.r a - - Z ✓ Xr. - J - ¢ kJd ti E g~, 4} Py r a - - - s r S'n-$- } - - - - - - . F' y:~."'- E -'N`om c - I _ 4 ~ t S 3 - i _ ~r= i - ,a t U a'L. ".Y"t t. ' n3X - ,~....;xu+ -..''S<"-_,coa - i, t„j ` ;~'t~ f' t. ! - r V- r - y-,~., t'om~,-- . ` -r;yr,; a r r-_t, F * . F~kas }J ,d i v4 - s , l Y =r9 i,, T = 2. Goal 2. Land Use Planning, is met because the City applied all relevant Statewide fa~' k L _B11 Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Community Development Rt FS Code requirements in review of this proposal. ~ ' n it - _ 3. Goal 11. Public Facilities and Services and Goal 12 Transportation, are met because ''r,- ~ :,-1 the proposed measures assist in implementing the provision of public facilities and _ ,Y services, and transportation facilities in a more timely, orderly and efficient manner r ,5'~ , 3 i ' ' _ _ to provide defined levels of service improvements determined to be necessary by , studies showing specific facts and findings for each development to be consistent s , and "roughly proportional" to the impacts of those developments. - .;,,3!A ji 3 , _ - - ~ The proposal is consistent with the City's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan based on the , f , r W j following findings: ,ti , ,,l`~ Q - t - _ "'NI, ,Vv tel. f " 1. Policies l.l.l.a. and c. are satisfied because the proposed code changes are r K ~ x ~x { consistent with Statewide Planning Goals as indicated above and the changes help; q 4 > - y x to keep the development code current with local needs and recent case law. F y , ~ E# i - ' 2. Policies 2.1.1 and 2.13 are satisfied because the proposal has been reviewed at u gm { public hearings and through the City's Public Involvement process. 3 ? , , _ ~r ~['it~ l- }""`mot f E EN 3. The Council finds that the proposed changes are consistent with the provisions of ~ 4 : t roc , 'N i 7 z Comprehensive Plan Policies 3, Natural Features and Open Space, because these policies call for development control of floodplains and greenway areas and these 'F i 3 Ks i 0. provisions provide a tool consistent with recent case law to assess the impact and ~T,~ ~ t y need for improvements, reservations and dedication that is roughly proportional to ' ~ "MWO - hit afar-, o A fi k 4 the impact of the development. a ` l 4. The Council finds that the proposed changes are consistent with the provisions of g ~ ' ~ ~Comprehensive Plan Policies 7, Public Facilities and Services and 8, Transportation , _ which call for ensuring that as a precondition to development, developments 'k ;r coincide with the availability of adequate services and that development is to s F t provide streets and right-of-way consistent with City standards. The proposed i a ' changes provide an implementation tool that specifically measures impacts to Y~ .5 Ct-- d.S' M k [g'~ F' determine whether development requirements are "roughly proportional" to the impacts of those developments. "ice I'll 5. Community Development Code Section 18.30 which establishes procedures for - legislative code changes is satisfied according to the above findings. F r s, - SECTION 2: Community Development Code Chapter 18.32 shall be revised as shown in Exhibit "A". z Q , I J f - . $k y'- SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the - . I- r z' Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. 4 - . S t ' ( PASSED: By. 1.1 nG1 Y1, m0ll$ vote of all Council members present after being read by y~ t' number and title only, this 1 _ day of R 1996. 1 ~ , >f ORDINANCE No. 96 3 ' b; - s- Paget a ~ t F ~ 3! _i .c~.r-r-- '^z- _ .f may- TMz7t~ I fi_ 'fir' a - I - ? _ _ _ - n s e _ " d - -i ra} d S Std f ~E F1 T1 ''.s~' r3 j a Y A ,P^; 7 J - i s s - c -i fl 5 , I ' ' - I 1 L F, , . ; " : , , I ~ . ~ I - 4 F.- ~ ~ r r ~ M . , ~1~ I r . . . - r _r . ~~S _ s•..-, S/': . ._.L _ i_.-.,.L. ve.z -i r., y_ ~ a _t __:.,Z,_, A= ;;sue--s d-. ' - tS' gg- $v,1++~~.~- F 5-4 "M -57 wzt; O ~ x 3* s+c, =v-''F~ r;~~~d~a~ u~ERM~ i tsz pcr' „ cx- -`a5',..-a Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder xc#~g~,`' ~ APPROVED: B Ti and Ci Council this ) daYof Y g tY ___LL__ 1996. Yt J coli, Mayor ~ IN 21 y Approved as to form: $tY Attorney by Datefr _ a' t } g }F kkiVjmW0rdlzua9(.03.md ~ f Imo" # azz y - - DickBUsmm 8:41 AM aF '"r g a t At! r S wax v a - tc' a sz M: ti r `jam t j off. Ali t 3 ORDINANCE No. 96--2L.) W t Tt NPage 3r a or M%7 wx 'x t 2-K, TW 2, 'OMW e s- - ' 'rr',rrr°'""$, - .~,•aa-°^,~e.r_~°a-'..'-^-°-. ~."..-.,.,~.,-.,-.zt.~,. xra ..fi,,,ti _ ..m~$.~y'e~. lC k F 4 t hrt t - t ty+-bA2'3`i<°Y hOQ -07 A a7:v c:... y - 7 - - Ma M a`a 2w'^• c,F i "r.' z z S- _ t t. "7' 7Sa - Kk s -7 y a s a "05 U- r~k:;~:~fr ~3 1~ 4, t :.rev a~- xrv •`.,ts€ - ° _ 'qRf 6r1 t - " - x - t -s t Ct t, r .~f T{ ss F t ~ y....~.R ~ w«F mot` r -l~n`.T-r,C' r _ .'_"tr~•i"E~ ` e.. ~s s t is 1~;5..-< r }J, - i --7 ~5 - ' a - - , - - i.r "I,-, v ,`tom .1 - I- I 11 Ws'i 5 t - -s- au.:.:as'at::atitJr - s - rw,ZN,- - - t`ja~ sY r.5 `ra b4 € 13''pt t` f .es, r n - - - p 9 3RD, - t ; ~i ~~kLi - K EXHIBIT A N « g iIra" , rv ma✓ g z~~ ~ 11 ~ 3 , DgntCaTtON AND IMPACT STUDY AMENDMENTS TO tis> ~ _ . { r _ I CHAPTER 18 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE- Y - - x 4t 2 Y.3!..y~ -f - bi 'c9 m 1 Language proposed to be added is underlined. - -j,-10. k w n r S; 4 .J K *I 4 ---fi _ 7 - 18.32.050 Application Submittal Requirements: Refilsal of Wn ADDlication _ 7 , w rte, ti ~ s~ n z~ B_L Include an impact study. The impa t tt shall quantify the effect of th ~ e~ , W , development on public facilities and services The study shall address- at a - ^ 3 t rr minimum. the tnncportadon system, including bikeways. he drainage ~ , 1 5 system, he park cystem, the waterVstem- rhP gewrr cvstem and the nois j, 3 ~~1 a.... w~ - { impact: of the development. For each public facility 5vC}ens and h of 4,R i 17 ` impact, he study shall propose improvement: necesa rv to meet itv t 'v v ~t~.'~tp , r`a + standa_rdc and to minimize the impact of the development on the public a g j large. public f~rilitie c stems. and affected nvat ro users- In it..~Y R-t~R-R~13Y~~~° 4 ~^7 - 7 situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication _:1 } 4` . ti a "Ill e` f of real proper interests- h applicant hall either specifically con: ,r v^ h 7 irw I the dedication requirement. or provide evidence which supports the sr a=lusion that the real pro gay dedication requirement is not ro bn Iv Z~ R- roRortional to the R Jected impacts of the development _ - 11 ro y " e - .i 18.32.250 t i -i g x,h 4 52 , E-2 Conditions may include, but are not limited to ~ - ~ } a Minimum lot sizes; ~ 11. - , Ii L' 3* ;;,rtes i` _.l b. Larger setbacks; s ~ R,,4 ~ - z r - c. Preservation of significant natural features; and f k ,ate ' 4 - ' s 5 d_ Dedication of easements ' _ - _ x When a condition of approval requires he Iransfer to thepublic of ~n interest in al 5 c xl 0 j € oronerty. the approval authority shall adopt findings which c,pporr h ; - that the interest in real AroR~. rtv to b ncferred is rough x s V -ly_pL4portional to the t a- `.J impact the proposed development will have on the public ` , 0 "«r , s ¢ E r- x 'z h 2 , $4- s EXHIBIT A -PAGE 1 ~ S ~ ~ W_ t-1 ? ; it _ DEDICATION AND IMPACT STUDY Fu~tENDMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (ZOA 96-0003) .t i` - 3 a- - - Y Yr' r { { .,,j ,f d -p k~' At`. 2{x t- - *P_ - .'7-p ...c -sax lz" y, S y s. 1 t s o, t' Yh4 { 1 N ~ - 1 'T'~: p - i _ {'Ci tr sr' x Y~ k v _ ---E.> jr x rc YZ" 4 - , - " , ~~--`i ~ , ~ , ~ ~ ",j r s- ~ , btu., - - e a 1 } _ - i § l . , ; r - _ & i r -7 _ J ~a M s - H? 1 Y 5 f~ - - _ _ - { lY 1'v-- Y % J , _ _ _ b 1 Y f 11 -1 IL 1- ~ E - r n -rte' Tom{ ~ = _ S - - - - - - - - . - - - Jro - ` I k x I e7hY5?s - t - .,ate.--'h x - - t 4 - - it -xscis a 3 t- t n k y,, Y, - 3 - t- i, 01- -I G F - V'~Z"ACEI~pA:lTEIWMQ,, 2 -.VISITQR'SrAGE~lDA D~~fl=- "June 11.1896 + xis I'll s t (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) r ~ ,Y ` .SG 3 f4 S s k - e r -.u x ' Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear , from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your} I- co Yerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the Y _ meeting. Thank you., 1 " gam" ~ f€ i ~ xE STAFF A , ty~ q4a NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC CONTACTED " ^d 4 vF 14-1 11 - - ~.4 eta':- - ~ 1 5 i ? - k rAy> ' j W- fi u _ T x` t~'~, i:utter', v t".- * iffin, I" t p i a ` ~3 1tr'iYB G V x4 4i j; r j s ~ T r x -zt - i 1 - ~y ,1. ~ IF t A R ig M. s ~ z . ~~i' ~ W' a _1 I t i S fiY 3~ X Y 7, 44"- - ' 4 t Y ki Y ~ .1 P ~ ~ a-' a'r t r pq I f -d.Vj WhihhLdoc fi ~+"'3A1-I - of r e a^ - -~,",77 < ~......~....rs:«' ' Y~"~-; X2"'3, €E 1 xlr. - x - , _ -""t"! q , - Ph , ~ ~ P~.',"--"~"] L. , -1, - ~ - - , " ~ , ~,,~,~,-"~':'.,'~'.,'~~i",-.-'.,,~~'.-*~,r,--".~:1, ~ ~ 4 7a i 12 , - I L' . , , , - - - - 11 - J, , ~4~~ ~ - - X ga Z- js T , - G j.3 „tea _ , . ' _ ~ ' ' , ~ P" , . ~ V : : ~ , r_ , - - - - t,a _ - s {i J Y 1 - _ v' 4 i - ,t, tt ~ a„ - r-.z P d qua, i, _ d r `dips k, r M~"- r a .J x ~-'-'7 . ~ _ r A WASA, Q As M SO ~,wF L >4''"' -r<r,S ~,.'y 'S 1 a c _ R Y c° 3 bq, ..t 5 -,t,'~' 2yfl - F ON 0 04. syn. e~ s ~ v t~ Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of ae time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement 4 4 oral testimony. c~ MAE ,~3 rsr tea- fi 'r, ,~z` ¢~f Y Y k A( iENI N(a 4 ~A l J1ine 11;149sr ~s r . ~ NOW 4 s ' PUBLIC HEARING - 1996-97 USES OF STATE REVENUE SHARING r~~~ Mi! z My -W W _ k x C ' ~y~ t d ~.a SS PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETSe _r WwW%11110 ~ r n t N r {T~ Nip - c y!M , AV RON, 77, a »z ~ ~ a t:a s rt '1 x sr 3 r+ u ti i .r'~rig ~a £ - 9- 'r F _ , a `x~'t .y. ^ir-'•1; .qy, i A-Tv by "M "n Qi, 06 "IP "g i n r y d i t -nr~ h - Cr 1. t. s ' - a -T 2 ~ _ r _ 3 - - - s J a t _ --~c'> may,- t;' - z _ ~~..._~a v',.`a."z z s<,-. a f-e w - y. ® ysa..... z ->Sya :5 s ry ^ a , ii '~v 3 YS J} - - _ _ ~ .r's `1' '<,y'~- ~ . -xX'..~~ 8T' - - _ _ ......,b.e._m a. - E.f-"€g-9 P, yen R ~t~" , _ s . f 3 - f _y ~ '14 Q ~ 7 AGi, p TF.M; I, I ~-.tF`ra1 PLEASE PRINT R ¢ , `fi Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) ` ~i~ t t Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 4 k'"'-" d T y'' 11 s - ? - 0,- ,tea` i~ °`':xrt,,~ „7 Ye - - 3 r - Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No.~, ° I I $ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. w - 5 s~~ :~"'--'I~'~--~~;~t'~' -1 e~.z-~c.'] I . Ll - Y X - f Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. fE - "`R uY-~fi i y - x Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. k`s n~4.~ ' ' - ' ?.17'3.1-T^~,i $i t.`W`,~.e:.r. . * {K Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ~ - ~w ,'1 - - tt a ~11 £ -11 ~ i# s'~ „-Wi 66ff '41 " f Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ~ € + rt - a' cam" q a _k ~ W jr _ 014 # - C_- a A'4 ,r cr J _1 ~W y ys' Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. " f"~ ; I, J - z ns" r r s RKI g x - Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. `{r St 2 ;S, .s+A *1 I ' Rh tip 3 r' a } _ V f---- ~ i h"" J.' - -y 4"M SZ 1 y j q~~e~i'l "~~:~'~-~7~'--tz'~'7"",- - " ' ~Z~ L. -1 - - ~ k _ - --""'a'rc . lz.c ei s'~ '3 c-' - mot-- ':1 3l - 4.? Y 0 - p S X rt' 3 kl- - b~ JE 'j~~"' Z~~"j- . ~ 12 ~ . " t" ! f t n fi ] Y X, , J , { r r . i- g -2 - - A'` - _ - ' k _s r s 'M ' ` EE - _y , fit p "All Vs> ti a - - + f f{r qs ~ 7A+'r I W-FiRkM f` h' T - -1 _ 7 T - - ~i p~ Ls. mF rS Ji^,F.~ y UWAS1 zoom ---w- A 'X~•+`-~"~ag r,, -tc _ } F r r. t ; p -J ~x rS ism d- k~Xc~~*fy`a ! z i via 36 goat f4=1 ass. 4*,M. •aA 1 fir,A _ _ 1 Y ir.` s` ~5;,.~~3. ~`~.~'aT ""a-.m ate''-, k~ •C r~,- - - •.L~Y;~, ~'=5 ~•+~4'a`~y Ga€~,h+j ` r.xP~- t . MEMO, T"POTR x r De ding on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of ` ' x ~"t x g timeeeeach person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may z 4 3'~ + r further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement x oral testimony. »,i~„~~,A Si hrR < 7" XYry s`i,-~ mill, f" F ~nn~~n~- ~a wi t.*ma7ilia:,ITL'IiRt~r•'~:{ -r1a1~!E.:.,Yu'V { 4 ME- ?ti PUBLIC HEARING -1996-97 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET f~~~ 3 tft R '3c 1E~ ~bi ,Fa k~~ t~? & -S q ~ •titF ~~nr eiA SL y Tr'_fh~' PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS s x- ~xy~~ Aax X r ~ Ly V' Y 3,. A^ own L', 6 - Z, ~ ! k MM, 1t23 ,q~ t ,pt +dYpt '-0 _ L R~cs~ POONA , 4 ( `~•q C"y _ ~ e2aftzY CF f Jr z AWN 0 ~Q1 ' MR d vM.jM%NUN. n S r' - _ _ - soups 10 WMA" N A_a: uvhqp"0 0- 0, -v 1.0 ju W"; K-- k * 2 e-'o'i',• y { l ' < < t t`,~ c4 i'~.4'Sf v 1 11 t- - _ _ - _ ~MyLc f9,W at Nov QYW 02"M J"Q 0,0 O-VVIA Vrowonang y", -it' 3 4 f 3 - Sr '#m, aT3~' 7` i; y`3 pa~-~acc"'"?r•- t Sq ' r .Fa rw a 4 - _ - s6 ~ ~'~'Sq 't s,L i1.,-a.... ___w. - ____.4~ ..,..,......ew.~.wxw..,s.-4 _..>.._..ea. - a ,-a t~'x t"t,~•1 . x a~ `y %ti v 3 -N3V fir? A/. _ -b s PLEASEPRM Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) Tt ` ~a ti a t ' Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No, { ggl Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. `NSF Y7201 =tE- Al Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ° '{s _ .3..55 S f } , ,K .S.ry'O'.xi qk Y i~ yr'n~ "A e t > > 'r Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. M } Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. e a £ - F Y"i 3 ~ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ST ¢ s~ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No.a r * §iw s97 1 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ti r'r [ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. r r } d gp + a e 31 zr Y ~ t 4~ h ~ s a > r 4 r - r x i s ~a < S Y f K fttq~~ :4 j' ~u `y-J 4 Ste„ T - £ t _ - - - - - 1 Y - 'k - ~i L a , s e 111, sat - iF $e E.+*~ r~ i n 'j'k ' - 7 - i ; _ KF'ti - -...e.._~-'- _ - G 8,~MIN ...~......Y._ ^ -^-^S .z,~ - x~Y. 1 ."_..-.a eu~aay::itiYtA'tYC a°.~;.y ..3b^, s .Y a=tt., - F q t k .n ikl ' . I- ~s"~. ivy Fay'2 ,^k°4'}f -11 Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of f°7"- ` 1v tune each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may V"a a4„ further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement -11~ 11,`" ~ ~ ~ 4 , v c t= ?~0 11 - ~a F ' oral testimony. t . v A sa"-'A +r ~-,h: `-{sfix} e i T± NVt-e, §)AT&.-June- 2M... ~.'i` °M PiTRT.r!` (1DP(1DTfT~nmV TO nnr,rn,rc~rr - l'naADiTAia-ar,.u.u a~v~a.i~tul,~ n..rnnn~rc~.m~m1 rl(VJL'Vl YKIVIC •••~Il Y LIST - r . . ry s v.,^t r. .v ..va..i.u.a~a aa 77 s aF I - x ~ - < - PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS ",i r - -1 1. - 11 ~ t` _1 it - } p-*' Yi 1, x ~1 ~ v''s fir... -y f t a k i a , t a s - ~'-r1 rx4~*exS,• - A La" `Z 11_- i.afi r-'s'ta`6`4 4; yxC .,I ~-+r v - - R- e rr§- r r xf a : fr s r- - -x r? gk. C ~ '`Z mss' L~ - r- Jj f ~'tov Wt i pad , c r r _X -i r s w g..,x F i ..r _a 17w, , lT.nj J 5r .2c 4 9 rt °k y- _'''.~r ..Y"" 'r j '-`^",~.,,i wu ;..w=' n.✓^r -•2-_•4g.-'St`x.i~o4 _ _ - - 777777M '25 ~ ' - _ -,Y 11 1- M Y "I" N Kk~~ a Y-r .x , - f - - 4 P e -5 y - ! ty = r, Fz T n} F t r ,n 9 a d~, xr p a z ° i a F MY ?~f 11 -zs L 3 Y - .C Y M_,r-~r;,,M . . , " "r, - , - , , , _,711 _,W~1. __,__r,,,,~~!~!,,rjr" - - - . t , -I 1-1 y._ PKM*' - 17_ n._. _ g r; {i - FF-t ~ ti.---, , , ,,-,,-,7-~ - - ~ - E YyYwS t £r 0' C ~c,i : g- i rS I n nz{ - q z r N 3 i= tG ` s-O s cu s 1 n (a,, 3 K z4''," s r AGENDA PI EM NO. 6t_ a x m f. PLEASE PRINT t 4 f - z Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) ' x as t Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. . " 1-1 -z I 11 , !1- kxt p f)(-,-,c `^r; ~Vc C stilC ` 151,` 'iC-Q€ v i t £ s ~ t _ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 1► ~ y K- Y /Z S°Zo ,..fGfJ /l1.9/" s -,?z - a. amt S Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 101 ','yam, "J YA-F/~\ i'.-`e--,y it~}„s,AT"§t' ' .1 a - _ ,i- s - ' ti h ~ ads - - - < _ r , Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. - 'r a r ' F - s,{' ,C.° Fob S 9 t ` ~ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. > - 4u~ Y% i j - Syr , 4 ~i'~',~-A ~i~ - F'Yy "7 ` Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. -fit f k ; `l{tz h fi_1 y , 4'iL aft 4r1 't- a r Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. - A r y Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. a §,;N--,6 f - 33 I I'll It - C' ` ~?i - - 4.nr ~Sp - C {3 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ~ - , F~ a - t f e' s 3' r ? ~Srk7 - > ,.i~1 1 .F:.'h f .I Tl~ f - -Yp t y t -t,- # Xr 'I i i -xT - "x',,r .'v°'S-, - - a", m. , rr+- TM-~F ;,.f~.,:-«R-....-- F L L . I - ~ , 1~~ ,~-'-"-'~;~'~~-,T~ ,L' t r a E r ~„~,ta ^ y - - 'Fi`g. --,F r. ."-.'--a~, J, - - . . ~ ~ t~: ~ ~ , - - - , . - 0 ~ , ~ , 4 _ art f } vi - Y 2 } i4~L r< - z' f - - S y'~ r~Ir4 t' r'C - 3 4 F r - - ' §2 iY{ i F}Y C"¢ J+2+r l f' _d f ) - °j..t .n;>s'"-~1 4 K S'+ fir` 4 5 i ¢a 9 #Q"E cx ~ y r J t xE;, y - . r - - § ty DES. PS'" ,Z J - _ -s~ t,,p,- X a, {>~'°'rs-- - _ _ t jai§fiis' -~xaS,*,'`a'` , 11 '.K M 1-,N fix' tc w i 4 A4 f xt„". - x r+ -At"""i" t y'~#* - ~~s~' A s 1~ t ax s4}c3 r t* Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of - r a ;✓time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may ' J~K further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement } ,.,r t~} oral testimony. € F~'r 1~-'t~w~-a'.ar`-- & dnp ~*;=m..Au:v-Q;. ':`=`.iirie¢`+aime'iiYybwa:"'-.~~p-. tam y ' 2 yy e CONTINUATION (FROM COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21, 1996) OF PUBLIC HEARING + ; M- I i > (LEGISLATIVE) - ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (LOA) 96-0003- DEDICATION, ? a ~ !v i F RESERVATION AND IMPACT STUDY REQUIREMENTS -The City of Tigard proposes amendments ~ 4~ 1{ - 3 n ` to the Community Development Code Sections 18.32.050 B.5, 18.32.250 E.2, 18.96,010 A. and .-W5 ` ; 18.96.100 A. and B. to require impact study, reservation and dedication requirements for public 11Z - v~ T ti s . facilities and services. LOCATION. City Wide. ZONE: N/A. APPLICABLE REVIEW n i v CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 11 and 12; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1. 1.1 , ; ~ a a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 3, 7 and 8, Community Development Code Chapter 18.30.,IF 11- A- I z PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS ~Z Y ' 12' - ~ { ty. V Imo, y t } t ,O't 3Y ti~ Y E r. ';rte F, , € :II m Fr € F xiY tr to - ; T - Y.,- _ } `4 r a+'2t`' 3h a ` o z-''"'"'`} #r' r_ , g-q 2'- 4" _ - 4 Y v}~; $ E 'W ° -fie n y- ~ f - -1 7 aV - -s _ .r s I _ -.1 4 x r r~ tea' - y P ,.u, $ t - ? W - ~z#a r`.,t tiii - `..f -t§ R1 k k X axe°,*r^ 11 X344 fi ~r _ t - .i } Y.'"+' k - - Y c 4? ` ~ _ - t s n +rtwrm .,,«rn.W e4 r a~ d.r say t _ ,T?'~' `_.4~ 2 - - , - , , , ~ " , * ~ ~ - j~~ - L ~ , _ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ - , , 1 " ~ .~',_':~i' M 9 t ,?fit i f a - jr[p' _ r yy'4. r { ra F - 1 F tom, ar c + xt 1- v.*,a C# - S 4 t yY t } - t°,Y V 54., i I ffi-XIA , ~ I -;`1':`_1'_~1 I , I , . - - , - I I ~ r__ __i~, I - . a- , - r,.1 - - x. , r ~i„- s a a ri i~FxcFys t € a - r`t a era'' - : •;z - v...~.._ . _ °--p*;:~,.' .:..r;: r"~+. .~w._ F✓ - t -1 I 1 3 1 Es 3- A *T 3 , p Y s.c` 4~i , -11 1! -`1 Z s t r` , PLEASE PRINT 1 R-' - ` Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) ~ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. t r y - ,x ESN 2 ~-'F l r P$ +Hn r x Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. M I~L 4 ~f t' K Y ~1 r a f - 2 `yi-l l .,Y; T, 11 - = -j: 1 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 4,,a *~~M ~ ~ ~ ~ S z v rn. y r t r - 'S-xj, 4 # 1'agd?F h ! Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. f t `l- J _ 'd - i ,gym t° .'z." S,.- ..r - ib -g `a .Rs ,M Ilk 3a w;l 1E Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No.3 <~-fit;. n .4l'C^•~,`'`, i '1, ,#xs y{ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ? r - 1 _ '4 'j„v 'R~sda~5r°,F rr.Yk --fJ - ~ ~ , Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. _ fpp- . t r j - gk:5 ~y "Ill .3f ~ 11, ' Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. y7 , sue,, ,i ~ ~ s~, , Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. C:` 4! " z Wf - - - - £ ~f t t CL' - - pp s~ - a s id s.'.. - ',"i s n~ 2 `r~'J "-cr y ` x < - , i t S sY ..,h 1 ~k § f - 0, ~,Fi-~Iffi - , 4, ~J- : . ~ . , , - -1 - ,,%.!I;, wG - 3 7 , VA', X cy., •R F ! k M't 5 e~ .4 - y r -7 - : - - ~M , : "5 a x 4,,- S$ h y 4 s s,' .q- sib `3 _ 5 f d 'l b.7 5 . 'g % L - - - .T F a rte' _ - 3i _ e'+ 7:T 1. r w r 1, -t'• -fir., ~av. `vF•G.~ F1iJ sF y 9 c t-, i_3 . i - V F T• w : e" .d fu e % Y i. F° a.4r "i `I -k_' r a _ _ ! 'r _ _ {Et 'Wj r' - " ' `"•,a. _ z x - - - _ - ' -mss ' ' i~ n }g•pSvs- A'M 1 f F `~1a Eg dy~,.,'~yy?.;; NT {ytT L "tivt - 3 Ala. $ 4 { Z ~ ?Y~~ VV R F-43"hr,~ti.. -e ".4 Al 2 pgz ¢r r fit. ,_...__.....,...~r....~.. :bs.v,~,;q•s w.,o.: • s " ,,fir wn~` rv!%ffi ,+rzrstii "x" ia,JS;v 1 ' fC C` - Nc, 'ia~ ;.'".j " ter. ` /l 1 f € s U., Milli MEMORANDUM s4ud ' "s s , %_Ii z OF TIGARD, OREGON 3**~~ F - '"j~~ti}.•..i~L+s4~.,^7 ,rte . c TO: h4avor and Councilz FRONI: Liz Newton, Assistant to Citv Administrator t ~ ~ sr > } DATE: June 11. 1996 F z.` ~ fi SUBJECT: Cook Park Expansion plans t 4 At the June 5 Souht CIT meeting, the 27 members in attendance discussed the planned expansion for Cook Park. In addition to submitting individual comments as requested by staff, consensus of s 4 W $ the members was as follows: r • Concerns about lack of all interests participating in the RFP. A Park System Master Plan should be completed first. ~ ~ ~ a • Steering Committee representation needs to be broader. ;.y°dr- kF f:; ~~44, F''ca`f`a ^•M f ~C ~ C ~ s s~ ~ x r Y t r `~i w.-aF1,.~ -r - h + q I? E t ~ama° ; .r 1 C a„"'"r„~~,$, - :~w°i..`~z s..a'<s'"5. = a.~-w `~.«.s• ai~K h z -r,s^--.-Fe -K - t~ _73 77 PION, ".`51 Y sN, "53~.1'w~ W 73^' A*r a r d. r L .1 j - x ~ ~ _ u,tc5 ~ x~' f roy. ~ y: 4 K i 7'AWN,- rs~~,''*aa ~r"~, 4. _ - r - - ° s't" x `"'t~t.~ t '3 =e" ~x~~-r" - - y s s ~ a t zc - ,r'Aipc, ia y."~ ~•51 'M K su„~,€~s` ^u e .r5 s s r ""h _ - s f a k .Y-r.-h,4• eM I- _ -f y E - ~,~w~ tE •i ~ f t 3 a a ~ 7, tiT s - - '~.x # z i $ , ~ - I -11 I- - I ~ - - J'. , - ~ - ` d , rx_., ate. } -s _ 3 z < - t' fc* g_.*-1a,N y ,`g I rtif I -N ~-h* rt" z~.. 3 'ii~,,;<' r ~n` es.S"3EGtaa s........+...-, z -.9 . i J_ - k~3 -T~ b ' ~''*C -I #u, - to a# ~ f - - l , ? - I _40 , 3 5~, ¢ I r 1eY1(~ U' f i~1 x.}~ z"i€r y;;s` - key. ` j~y'FI''M, `cicr_.s +ze~*"~ a d F~~, Cook Park Expansion Study ~0 31 , ~ ~ 1'1 ~ SOUTH CIT WRITTEN COMMENTS, 6/5/96 J,lzSS) yr?~,: 'Y''` - ~,SgS „-yC ^r:«, 'y _ -s< b tat 1-1 ,i n j a Helen Mason, 9790 SW Bearwood _ , ~q = r~ fi3F r~r,,s!I M4 f~~ Leave as wetlands! ' ` ~ I ~4 r="' ~ t r ,Nl Revise Park Master Plan! s Have fair representation. " z F 3 r a - t v £ n_ Brian Wegener, 639-7791 , I 4; lu • RFP should be written over to represent other interests besides athletics x a a,r " leagues. STOP NOW and START OVER. ~ ,4 tx The wetlands are not a problem to be dealt with but a resource, for w ;~Y a € > ' Y aesthetics, natural areas, education, water quality, flood storage. , ~ -rte -IV • Neighbors should also be consulted before an RFP is written. s r The steering committee needs representation from neighborhood and ' . r;::- environmental groups. ~ eW T'~F1i4"i,rK:_a.,zws="t''a:>;:;,.: • Li ``~''-`mr':..-~:''c•:,~}'- .a I ~ 4 ~ i + z Newton shouldn't cut off discussion at CIT meeting until the group is 'I , 7 read to quit discussing. y F r t ~ ry - - 5 4, Anonymous ~M~ I a ' ~ { Committee selection-open or closed? Seems closed. s , -11 ,ry~~: f • Leave as wetlands ;r1`~~ Py • No more concentration of public on this site. ~ Yy - - Off street parking area? mot` ~ jj' -x Y Access Road?? Where impact to wetlands... width enough for parking? s ' 1 ` y r-1 • Why are you looking for a Bandstand Amphitheater? Multi- u ose buildin a;1 P m s 1 I E r ,k in the Flood Plain?~ fir. d' F S 1 f L' T*, t r+ F ! Mark R. Vossler, Rivervvood Lane, Tigardfi~ ' & Wetlands issues need to be addressed early as a pragmatic move. If we ~ - N ' c ignore them early it is likely to cost us more in the long run. It is likely that ° -58X6 I ~ yi' ~ A -f groups such as Audubon and Tualatin Riverkeepers will raise a fuss if , € 'y wetlands aren't protected. d ~ . I think the steering committee should be broadened to include a tl ~ ~ r . r' - .4g - representative from the following: r~,a-"' v~"r , w _ {cr . I 11 4 .f"P S x. i 4 ~ f 1 - 2 Tigard citizens (at least one from an adjacent neighborhood) 2 t 11 A Tualatin Riverkeepers representative. a t` s k s € t • 1 wonder about the scientific validation of "creating new wetlands" while filling j, _J ~ Ji" , , - - -l"N'w" ~ r in the old ones. 4 t 5 'q Jam"";j, . "4 '+'T. -ail - ,a~4~".- k, , t~* ~F - , t _ +~s t it + d , - - 3f' ¢s t t t I - xk , _ - 'sc'. .5 e- ,ter --,5, v •^-x .a' , W, I t' x fit a r,,,--x 4#,r°, ''14 -,r, ' a~`.f4~.ra1 r'" y - ' e k 'yo--., ss.;.' ; ~ `s '°.v'.."" .x" ,I r b p asp. - - r t 't~ s r -~r.s t _ s } ~t~ 'u - X57 3 '"YS, ~'w - - ` i ,C ,S e $ix ,gs. ,y sn - t r a s k t'[,, c ( - fi~•/" ":E„-A-F1 i"3 3 f d S -'-J' wS Pi yv ~„'y`„p k FC _ a,.v~. b 13 £ k"~`~ s k far 'i'~.t Sti E tI r7 i Otis -r U t q x 'i; t k : , t E 2 ~ f - - - - - - tJ:';: . . " - . . +E.._'' ' a a t dF r } a ' t F s s' 3 t y "r".F-- ,tcr'n"a - -F It - x - _ - _-`r- z~-s$~.3' t 1- ~rl 33' S 11 AM -I' ,'a - :aam. - - - - y 3~ s vs m- - -d'i.A Si_ § . ,S'- 3° N - - , - t5 '6R'L - S`r $+Yr.rt. . 3- x yy_. ERR .11 J x ` r Flood protection is a major concern of multiple nP~~ip present to- ' 8~, A` n~ 1 ,w.-•-- - - --r... ,,,yt,r,. ' a Misr s { ~ _ 3 ~~d~Cr quality in the Tualatin River is also a major concern. ~x~w - ^ - 3~ r ; t ys, .xS r- zt a s F Y Anonymous r a , ,F - • Wetlands must be maintained. ~ `x" { • Steering committee is weighted toward the interest of sports group-two out of t a -ti f five members are involved with groups that would use the sports facilities. 1 ' City appears to be rushing to the project because it's cheap. a~,F ,y t Park master plan should be updated before project continues. f r ~iti s "F * f ig- FAO i V j f 5 Anonymous g ' 3 • Wetlands should stay that way-you can't fool Mother Nature, i.e., the homes - 1 xr in Wilson Estates by Fanno Creek 100-year floodplain, some had water up to~ s ; the deck. We have also lost wildlife/ducks etc., because builder had City's l okay to build over a wetland. , 3 Need more Steering Committee representation and not just people who are . - ~ , } f contributing money. , -'`4 ~4 r Ashley Repp, 7th grade 1-i-',~ ~•~r Y " t I didn't really hear all of it, but I think that Cook Park is fine the way it is. Z~&Y . ` -z Ron Repp - I encourage acquiring more property, but would strongly suggest leaving the~~ property in a natural wetland state-perhaps a nature trail, etc. r 0-1 a ~ 3I ' € Michael F. Bohley, M.D., 684-0341 _ € s t, . ? f TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ' F~,~ x - " The proposed expansion of Cook Park raises many land use questions. I share ~1 ~ ~ - c r. lm_ w. , s~ m3fr~r `s> ? t the concerns of many other citizens regarding destruction of a very productive ! wetland area either directly or via encroachment on existing areas. A variety of a l t 1 waterfowl and other animals would be adversely affected. 4 I do not support development in these areas until public hearings have been ~ K -~kJ~, g held and citizen input has occurred. The fact that two of the five individuals on s V, the steering committee are affiliated with sports organizations is unacceptable. I xw r These individuals must by their very affiliation have a vested interest in~ developing this land to their own ends. Citizens present at the South Area CIT r N f 4 meeting found this generally unacceptable. ,g { } ~ } r ` My wife and I live in Waverly Estates-therefore OX development will affect us in s x ! I r some way. We are not foursquare against the expansion-but, far too much f 3 planning has occurred already without our input. We want the wetlands F,s t fir- = s1 s _ - ,dyy r 7 X X g rz1,. rr y 3r t .y u-"€ 1 1 < e d 4 'y V i C ,t.~' ? - - w - ,,,.zr .-'7 _X , 1 : 'rrc sus. n r,., e',s,aR. - + - ~ - u 2 - - uH'a ~ (}f J K - Y J - err ram r ' t _ std' k~ rr r 4 x 1T,! ' ii G -1 Y - _Zy ; q 5 f"+it d ✓ - 4 ' k K- 4'k firi r 'i 1 h t5 t - ri S+. .*t 1 5- _ y- _ r - d 4u~k,A ,b'-~t s - - 7tir "*r c - 1 C I ~ , i , , , ~ , - , I I ~ I . ~ I .1 I ~ ~ " - W I , . -1 11111111111111w 171-1. ~ - -2,n - T"'* "AL C _ 4. fit - - _ i - -S t."' y A1 S - - - - - - S. ~ ME s,.Ii.^ ''yV^+T-'~vyL 4 T ---'T - 'r> - _ YK ti-', - . - .._.......y...m s A ,L r;': ,<I- V U. vzry ~ r- ~`s r 4 t«- ' • i-~, i -zT-a'te''-+ R-1 I s n. { ~ ~ k f respected! We also already have a parking problem on our street-any 1 M > N i 11- t°? ,L r t kW expansion must take into account the impact on surrounding neighborhood 4 t.y~ ~ ~ ~ _11, I `.,fie. " areas. 'ti X,,-- y s _ - _ ? i` $ _ z ~z Rob Forrest, 16672 89th Place, 620-7661 } . , A r.. , It appears that decisions that affect the fLture of the land tracts are being ' x_ a' ~_g1~; made without representation from impacted residents or concerned residents € ~ I il-l" i throughout the city. ( t 1.£ I have the concern that existing wetland is either going to be encroached on • F n z or damaged. 1 would offer that a buffer be established of 100 feet+ from as ' x delineation line. This is being done in Eugene! ` 1 am a sport facility supporter and would welcome an opportunity to develop ' - this area Properly! Don't let sport interests dominate this development._ ~ , t H • I would be happy to participate in the Steering Committee. ~a I- I - ti -ter-' -ir .`,_r ,tea r Anonymous r .1 I ~ 11 • There seems to be a need to re-look at the General Plan for Parks in Tigard.., h 3 1 am also concerned about the five members of the Steering Committee, M V 4 rg - t * t. there is no representation for the Wetlands. ~il .3 4 f J AFL -ri I Anonymous ~ - A~ ~s L I'l ix • The ideas for what to do with an expanded Cook Park should come from all ,,sp, E . ~ CIT's and should be evaluated by a representative committee of various . _ 5 interests of Tigard citizens including a naturalist, gardener, 1 sports" ~ r 7 n s , organization (like field sports), 1 water sports organization (like boating, , s _ fishing). - • Opportunities such as a nature hike area, community gardens, wading pool or i~ ~ - , fountain should be seriously considered by a revised committee. - F r ' To ensure citizen input and approval, a public meeting should be held to vote on the various park development options. Furthermore, the options must , ; I , t- 'I include a variety of projects, not just sports field developments. = N , • { ~ "i r ` W_ Anonymous `t , . { ~ ~ , * r The Steering Committee should include a broader base-including a wetlands i' - $ _ ,I ,Ml , expert and/or "nature buff." qz~ ` f Going ahead with sports complex planning is premature. A broader took at the h ,M area is needed. ~i ~ ' 11 ~l _ , ; Parkins is a real concern for any or complex. _ - Y''i 40. - - - - E 3 h`'{° S L" ' N err ? r, l _ - 4 t sw -t .idr..5 yr.= 1 3...w y_ - - h , I d t '3r J l pq 1H 4 } hsXr r ' . 11 . .11 "i -'i" +iT ' t I, t, -k M ~Z y ugh," r^ sw &^S" .r.N ',,45" a^.~."'`:a..:fk, i, 1 y -Vk' 'f f „$lTd f ..I _ t 7y _ _ d---, 2~r - r i - - - -~Cn'- F llk~ Fs 1 - r i J _ 'a. ' A '`y mk L.3 ~•t 7 r U , ~i_-,~~;:, ,~,~:"~`i~~i,,_ _L,;`,~ , ~1~_ I, " , , t. t , a _ _ .k"; ~ .y }M 'x.44 ( , Z N, r , , ~ " ~ ~-~I`_.__, 11~ -.1 __1 f . , --LJ 1~ f ~'ZY ~ a '+'hA St 1 f, 7 -n1 f ~AZ ~VU 3 `x7M i- ? 4 - k' r J, Yy t j - { ; 1M- y sza -s ~ s ^ . ° r - -r=T c-- x ` 'e y 1 _ J ` r s Y3 : - - ~~e ^ . -1 5- i _44MWZ - - - t t`s - v ,k k p --w 'T `ws M-F, - 17 , -3 € a x std s a } :F A a, a i,ili F y,+3 y~~V~,.~F•s 4,yA a , 's i k t> as S' k- {t.+X. 3 _ e,, 9...tm~.+, 3 q *-.'n'7 .-s~*.••g~P,, ~J" S- .,E s-r t,TM }r -'^~€~r'" O' E•C z 'F' -Y a- if } .1u a; 't a z - - ,Y,Z, Fz, - - 'i is I *t ^ Anonymous yam, M,Pg ~ , ~4 t„ 5 We would hate to see the wetlands destroyed. Even if a portion of them are T. z - { , saved, the wildlife will cease to inhabit them. The expansion will also increase ` ' , +~a, ~ ? z traffic flow, pollution garbage, people, noise, etc. , ~ t1X is it necessary to dgstrov "X i,i b< ' ctn. 3 © y , . 1 ~ V the wetlands/wildlife? nX s~t r -11 y W-iO a ~ , 51P x .nfnl,,..`ID`~~,,a,,~~M ibis zt~ another ICa ifornia!11 We native Oregonians want wildlife L~ r, r-,! , r 1 8~ ~ts s ~Z - t vacv... ;k 1f } 5 3 r i L7 - b JS ~ - P.S.-It was flooded in February. . I 1 ' 7 ~ 4_ < z , rt •r.r-t i L.' -fit'` - i t Vii.- . "i @ 's ma x x~~ S a . - , ~ 2 Anonymous , k~ ~ ~ 1 ` ~~t"."S:~ a,,'' lip l~ Concerns: rEk A ma_ -Mm ' " x Increased traffic/parking in Waverly Estates. - r t k~ - ; 5 Additional pedestrian traffic 92nd to Cook Park (speed limit 3t) too high-no # ~ 4 ~s sidewalks) t a~ ` k Destroy wetlands!! Rather they were preserved. - ~ I : - M - i ` - . , . - . Adverse effect to property t ,aa - - values to Waverly Estates.__. ,11 F _ increase in pollution ( ) ' = ' ~M ~.1. XeONI , trash, noise s ice' rk I Broaden the Steering Committee-seems one- sided.ai~ ,I Y Area under study is in flood zone. Why improve this land? $ , r . F ,X Increase traffic through Tigard High School Zone. : Ir -T-LS,. ry I - . , ' Concerns of neighborhoods not considered prior to study of Cook Park & Y 1 'Funding. ~A -'r ~ . s Anonymous` 11- - i Do not want wetlands interfered with between Waverly Drive and Cook Park. Concerned with increased traffic in nearby neighborhoods. • People on Steering Committee prejudicial to expand. How does one get on k ` 3~z & , - k committee? x3 • Aquatic preservation? G, f R !ti ' _ ' • What about this floodplain? Not suitable to build!! e ' S , , a _ • What about wildlife? Waterfowl? ' , f ~ f- t 5f r z . , 11 t r • RFP progress stopped until further evaluation. , . ; k • Cook Park expansion has no other concerns but for sport activities. What y , ~ t ~ t ~ x z6 about neighborhoods? ; t, M T q3 Barb Forrest, 16672 SW 89th Place, 620-7661 ~ - - e (Contains a sketch map of the Cook Park study areas with notations of "No ` fields in this area [arrow pointing to the Lamb-Gray property]" and "DO NOT t - , a~w TOUCH [arrow pointing to the wetlands on the Thomas property]" and "put fields a rl<- r . A down here [arrow pointing to the southern portion of the Thomas property]"). ` ' ' 4 { None of the areas which are wetlands or natural areas should be tampered with. 1J"r I x ,af fi t i- ; " ~ ~ Use only the pasture for fields and development-place any roads close to the Y ~ l ' , ~t' vS Y' a Fi r J ~'^rr'* "m'="' du -r*'uxi `x j r , s,`2.4,z stems -c^x3. - ;~?7..t~>'* c sr^t 1 5 z~.. Z - `3 r - T r y x g T_ Y J 3 l_ { g J,y"r s ''-rape` - x s e a, -T 4 r _ x~'~tt d ~tY '~fY ` f - t c" - s * 1 x r { ~ ,e j~z 'a t •1 ' tY' , sC#'x s,at~ 7 x J a xT•Xt~ ! r .k ""rsyW- t~ z x - ,2 - { - - - ye _ 8r-y 'j`t - pd i yr r x r - 5 - >i .fi t-~~#-,.4 _7 s X 1 x4`'~=e s & •t d'y 'rs 4 *sr 1 - r, r -"-----'-----s-- ---n.`,'. C~ ~r-z-.far,`-o-..~<.t...._ .e'-A;=r ,.._~...>R..-.~.~-..-x.,.o~. --,...~._.-„*---s•-er~~ ke.. 5"'~"l' sr~F'~ p t # 'rk t. t. - - ~ 5.~1.~r~''"F sv~.~`Ix,^'.~ r ¢;r} s°ma•~ K - ~,a a riz _ s - r rs k # - - t~~-~t'_ c<C.q Esc>.k-(#k~'. _ -z UyV; 5 Ji. ,.fix v w r h b u a''i 5 q M s%.: S- "M-51, R * r .A' _ 35`s X . f r - .},~..i- r~r~.=yak-~Yy.:r.,~..rr 'k r fin -a`~- s _ ° _ _ _ 'r _ i 3r- _,a.'v'z•Fy it"' i'g " kt~ ~t~~. r r`•'r#+,~v,>s`_ - c. .w.-u : _......._.n..._W.,~, :v.'.~~.._...i --r _ 4 ~~~t~s~ ' ~ ~ mtAr,.,~. APdN W~ 09 river. Preferably M road to connect to current Cook Park. No arkin lots ' below, m How do you get on the steering committee!? Should not be just sports x¢f` organizations!! Should be balanced with people concerned about the wetlands!! r Most of the place is mostly vv&. Leave it as wetland nature study area. Leave all trees, shrubs, etc. Why is consultant being selected already? There should be no plan whatsoever = 'Z' v x , 'r j`';tx ~``Y+ a f _ VlrpNCkpkexp.doe a a H ~ . r n-. N t --r~y k E - _ yy ~sT ate 5 _ y -1 r 'ZO, z~ dA~~y~T 'T 1• k _ '.'.ikra 3tT L k ~ ~ a r§~ a 16,~~ - 9 f~uY - ..+L~ff .Sa t Yf.? ..a.4 Y a<Fi*r~~'K•~ d ~ F ; 32 "n^_P 3 p :s k M~'~1~k~vu> - #°=s?"`fs~> r' ~ c 'r' r r rr y -t S t`s~ #@ + [ ,f 00 Fy F ygs~~~rs~.,, •'„x:~s~.,;`~;..'^9^~,.€1, 'k,~,' 1 - _ r" 'S ^ ,~;~n :~,~~s' J,n}R,'s:?a?.t~`~r_;"~,s vT .X. v`rs'~5~~"~'~p`` f drs i'r~f' z 1 y r - -i s s 'h r,~ i• s~. ssy ,~S~n r LV~ ~t"'¢z"' ~i Kr'', f x- ? i z f r j#•:[- 3 5 E i. .y„r,,.tiA $~ir IHakzi3 Sy°6 ql ? , F r - i N 2 _`,,,^'r is s .w"''~ rsar' Ya ; v µx' y r w sz xz 4 fY''fsv:`4'`'}"'`s.~ +5 ` x%-,, - . I - I , , , - 4,7 . , - - W 3 q: x ~ 7 t - z a F M 4 sf~' a M_ 6. -R~ $ .r Plr- r` a.........~ 's'--va :.awz_..~:.- L.J._..~_.,.a _ ` # Sr }„s,~-~"y _ 'i i- t' ~w pt~ 3 ` i° 4xf -'k`4fi j tt 4 Say t,.~ y 5 1 _ T- a)'-l3t' i tn s- ~r 4, -11 La ` 11 d ' To the Members of the Steering committee for the City of Tigard/ Cook Park 4 „ s > X_ t: g i; - ,t' i- ' From : Chris Counts - N ~ V`011 , } z Date : June 6, 1996, x u' - k. ) o Who is on first ? What is on second ? Nobodys on the third ? The Cook Park Expansion proposal reminds me of these famous lines. The development of up to 28 r ` t F over 5 acres of wetlands.4~ $ x acres of sports fields will destroy x a r p ~ T The wetlands are on first All of the 18.5 acres of wetlands identified in the Tigard Local , -N~ _;j ~ W - sW o- , ~ > - - d F,y Y;1 - awa J Wetlands inventory must remain intact in the proposed Cook Park expansion. Wetlands rehabilitation is on second. Enhancement and or rehabilitation of these e T F wetlands for flood protection ,water quality , and wildlife must guide any development Y., ikytn ,gig - ~ { x proposals. r rt } Infrastructure development is on third. It is the nobody we have federal wetlands t' e t ~ 1 it - . , regulations written to identify. All development that takes place must be buffered to #>r a r, protect the wetlands from the negative impacts of roads, parking lots , and pollution. a The current proposal for 28 acres of development will polarize the community. it directs w us to read the specs of the RFP as if this were a plan that protects our community - ~ 5- -1 - 7-,'~~ when there is no reference made in the scope of work to the 16.5 acres of wetlands. It b - _ rk'1,_,,1__! further tests my math skills to add the numbers of acres for development against the i total . Let me see 39 minus 28 equals 11 left for wetlands. The lawyers are going to get f - _ ' . rid ` t F rich. The Tualatin Riverkeepers will add many new Tigard members. s 1. I - As a professional in the field of Parks and Recreation. I know who is on first Clearly $ _r t neither Tualatin Parks & Recreation or Portland Parks with their large and successful . Mg~ youth sports programs were designed around a large sports complex that eliminated valuable wetlands in the 100 year floodplain.Geogrephic dispersal of these fields ,~~~Z T, throughout the community built with partnerships to the schools is the best model to meet community nasals. I strongly recommend a decentralized model that is sensitive 40, I- I- the environment and still provides for sports development in its greenspaces. U ~ F - 1# Sincerer x,, 'eN "':'N" ~~sp F Chris Counts 7 F ~ g~ i ; t1, " , , , ` Phone:639 5039 Home I -1 s 823-5300 Work jj(~~~ , 1 ~y? f ' S~J1~yam {n _1 I - ,fcc.]• aY1iI~.~✓ {p F em {-"S• SA "`f _ 97 7.2.4 S[ r % F 1 s F~ G r r k $ v k S 1 - ll : F r " q, 7 A k ash i e' y r z l.: N- k t y4 - - ( €z - a \ N- - - - t", - r 'F 7 ~ ~ ~ 0 , , I #i , F-, ka, cy -,sy a 0,11 c _ z ti 'cz 6 3',?. cr { `p , ' r rtm i r r - ,w 'yy-Ky' , z - F 'L' t ...j ,t"~' 4`a s k "e x i c t"' r - f t_ _ { f x . - s; 1x.'f~..w, " z t - . I - 'sa`- "dF°~--r' d y '•-f A x = S.k y x x z.`:{ , VU ..v-,gc~c' pis 3- t s _ * 1- 'fi t ^ 'I ,may 71 ! . - xc - a -1 11 a 4 Y€ t ,.ri,x gg, '4b` F- k'ir '3 "3 ~i .1 E e1.G- r" I e: s Council Agenda item 3. G Y ,=t,~t A 'k For Agenda 671 /CiCox}_ e ,~r~' N ~ N , MEMORANDUM ; g _ n ~2h,ra. { T€" Y .Z ~''L4 huh - ~i'rt`:,~;. ' "zS s , 5, to , _ ate ' ~ R CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Yoh T' 'k 11 i ' _ TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Bill Monahan, City Administrator t , ~ `~zzi n , r 2 DATE: June 3, 1996 ; 3 SUBJECT: COUNCIL CALENDAR, April through June 1996 r . i t r sue, - v 5~h, K0 a ' Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk If generally OK, we can " ~ ' - proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars. ~ ~ i . ,12 I *11 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) - G~ "F~~ ~ t ~ ;ru - Study Session x R d " F - ? ~ } _ Business Meeting a, f C ( 4-16 Fri-Sat Festival of Balloons # t ' ~ ; , , gs *18 Tues Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)3?~.W- = ti 1 *25 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) Fs:.~ , } _ ~ , y Study Session z ;fi H t~ ~ mss' ,x - Business Meeting y ..YL W ~ } l Tts. i, ' - ~ to ~ , a' k° r - ft ` 4 Thurs 4th of July Holiday (City Offices Closed) % t y l X - *9 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) 3 II. s . - 3 ; -If z - Studv Session - r _ - Business Meeting ' ,~-e a M r *16 Tues Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) ? F § *23 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)"4 e w Study Session at ~~=A x n- Business Meeting - - ~ Q ~ - Aiteust - t ~ t s *13 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) , N : - ` i V s Study Session 'I'll 9 V2 . - Business Meeting ^ " 3 f 1441 I— *20 Tues Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) ~ . r~ f 1 i2~ hE C vt r *27 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) x~ i Study Session co ~ , 1-1 U1. 1, I ~ ~ .1 f Business Meeting k yt N€ ~ , I, " ~F' '4Z x&ato- ~'_L r - ~ ~ n i-d C e a,,.,n iA2dmlcethy\coundPtcc&Ldoc s Z i 43 ~3'F.?r'SS 2i %il..k~ r47 ~ m M,rG~."3 y"M ,rW, a`'"'~ s f' - J x~ t~, e rr F a. -'a„hy f 1`& ,s z'Y, K-.- i 1 s f - v a s k* 5 - y s- # 3 f t_t _ ,0S r- at u 7 - ,11 R ''"g°,,.' p„n z tit 1 F r. n' 4 -f`~'Ft - tl7 1 1"', ~ a r m, , . ~ - , r t a 3 - - ~ x-t; s - r i F l 'key'" y _ a fi- x z < 3 s r- 3 j - a r a s r - L~ t £4 "t 3k4 Y a+-t _ { F ~ v' L kd 6g`~!k , .a '4-A41 11 - ~ °y 2.7 -z r"t - ti r ' r 'a - r,x syisz i - i c yr' .r ; -1"'7 z c b - - = i,€"~" r ',myw "Y.a - ..fS=" a. r _ 7 t-t d, s> . ° k~. F Y.~ s~ tk '7 3 ,M 'dD' tea; a> F { 4 m 4 td 4T";£ - _ - 'k 4 - - } -4 p T FY, F 9 , 'r1 -11 I L... _.T .,..1 ° ._._:..a _-I .Il..r_.. :-._v.._ '.`1 .,~Avl§ "y'a'-r. mgr-. i _ w - _ - - _„ag~ fi ka - r s= r > 4; +y^.~.a2 i'e. ~i=,iF cp .}4 '4 nr--s...=. r4 .~'jee ;`-4(c.lil _ s -c s r " 21 a n ~YM,M_ - acs`{ .~iu'k n _ z _--t, S pt '-..a't `3~"#~ 9y fC , I 11 -3 -t 3FH- s`" N IV-11 W-3,fi-i" Agenda Item No. 3, a~? 4<~,r-,. csx~.' iUi86ting Ot tD~i'~(p rte Fs`~ Y^ x - r~ 1 -N , # ~ s 1-1 ~ ..n a Updated 6/03/96` 11 ~ -_,F ` ?q TENTATIVE COUNCIL AGENDAS i ~ ya M ~ @ t uncii s Goals or t (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Go ~ , wN _.v 'y , r scheduled to follow-up a Council matter or request.) , Z f . ,.y,n ,"dry}', y_ 'L, i' ".o-s_; &,y, ~ 1r. ' a~ w S 2 } Date: June 18, 1996 ~ fP ` r , r, (No TV) I - Type:- t. r-' x r Start Time: 6:30 p.m. e " r y r 1- I ;I-- ' 11 F~ ~ Workshop Meeting Topics: ' _ Vy" ` > CIT Communications (Liz) I'll . IT r~ > Update: Metro 2040 (Jim) 3~"x x' _ ~ ~ > Status: City Council Goals (Bill) . 4 ' , > Finalize Long-Range, Short-Range Space Plans and Evaluate Funding Q~ e E (determine agenda date for formal adoption (Liz) O , " ~ . ,111 I i, , r > Charter Revisions: Review Staff Proposal. Schedule date for public x -1 x 11 'I e hearing. (Cathy) A~ ~ h , F ~ > Develop City's Direction for the Downtown Area Qim) t x , > Annexation Policy Discussion (Greg Berry, Jim Hendryx) > Discussion -Underground Utilities (continued from 4/23/96) y e fr M, 'ate r _ > Training: "Insurance 101" ; y,*. Ii., f l Y t . f fi r x ,F t 'a. r F a" a..ai. £ r _ "k _ - a- f fy~l r ~Y $X'3^t - t - a ~z t a n eta ui' 4 1 } ad {F 1 161 1 'gip t 9 s 's7~za ~.k J s ~N ad ` ' . a ~,1.j-,i "-,s < .s=cams - «w,-•,.. .,"`_""q _ ra ~i s~+'may, ,.r - j 30 , M ,sue `'l { ; _ 6 - 9 - - , , E-;.i. ~ ~ - " - - ~ " T.~' , - - , - r .w. B' r RL " _ ~ _ , . " _ -'-.'z-,,~r's,";~_, J Z - - fy t kySM C. a _ i .9 Y ~°'i` uw F. - J d s~ 4 - ? f a c~ F S } ' s. - 7 s~, j _ r „^U-'a ~zT 6 { T. .z? ,~s, r - 1 _ x c 'S ss at-N Sr. 'rl t a M " , ~ I ~ , ~ , ~ , - ~ - 1~1'1 I -4,--,Z,-%.'T",.*f,j, !~A ~ . _ s ry d - - - I v - - r~ - s 6T - - 77, SIT h 7 f-, _E'' s+,r 6K Y 14, tv< k ? -r TY - i t { t P 3 shf?, -14t hz~~'~4a . r., s a..~r.~r'^ x `rx 1- c _ r M fr `c~s +„'s "srt"3ws`"'& s. 4 a-r~ ~ ,c,r~ ~ - _.,~s~..i't 3t,'3'~'! o - x t ig ~3,'4s ~'~'r• t~``~'ri u Y, ''5'~:«'~ r^- - - _ adz # Lt yt,Y, % l - -3 t rt 4 F rt`C V , cc~ UMMLEX201,12,60 N, r z au a gghg 1M 9 M-4k-, (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Councils Goals or are r Wpq x scheduled to follow-up a Council matter or request.) I'M ONE W Date: dune 25, 199633 < Type: Business (TV) Y~ X-R R?, 51 U : d 'k MR Start Time: 6:30 p.m. Study Meeting S- T jglv~ 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting ;b Study .session: > Agenda Review d yu - Consent Agenda: y~ { r3'; K > Approve Council Minutes Business Meeting: z. > Consider ICA with Washington County Regarding Areas in Tgard s c s v Urban Growth Boundary.~~ € > Consider Ordinance - Transfer of Durham Road z 2 s ac- F r > Training: Ethics a 3, " "Oine X N i- i'y D~L > , t s a qtr``` i rs t . i r,w r rr a - q ' ''E* `r `'t=s tk 5~ ; y, s~ y'+y r. e - W, r A f c qgg ~~d~,~~ :.e{o sky -~~'~~k,~"~Y '~x"an ~ Z~T'r°~ e ~ - > 'YSU?^'°*~"'^ t ~~59 sar^,w...,.,-- -,.°-.`*.d•~' ' ~ d~'~ t` - a~ s~ 3, } a 7s ) !nn ZU" ~CG kv' W •~-,s,3`TF{fig "~!-fit'~kY w rrt b0v> .f T - < - - ~ zd '}'~.Y•' aj4j, N,34 'kW ^r i s f r _n eft. G 'r.,'F # f 'y _ 7 c+- ' "J i 3! r,' c ~ .arn. 1. - - - _ - ~ .,...-..~-Est-,. v.~rt~ew._s'~~~._T~~. ~ ~ti ~..~?~x u..~__._ ~~r::_: .r~•~^-e-.-,.~~.~.. _e...~~,.~za~~rs~eo^. • a ~ IN _5~i~l tka -Xi Or x:.... 'Fo-7' u~.S ,~^„'firs ` 5.=u'_ 1 `~zm-'~-i,r °`J G G zt'~- 'v- t Y _ ~ _ ys 3~ 4r '~•~Yfi~'~~-,a-#1~:~.^ 9 y ~ -Q g"5, Fe ~~E.:t~r R1Y~.t~ `>k RA- s-~ t0m@ `-RR~ ffil OR~~ c~ r~ (Nate: Items r+nderlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are r- f~ 0- L scheduled to follow-up a Council matter or request.)r~ Date: July 9, 1996.`'.. Type: Business (7V) « r*b tab +Y'RY L $ t'f3 ~ 't2'RF~`13 Zx i f Start Time: 6:30 p-m- Study Meeting - 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting.. ~ t Study Session: > Agenda Review r~_ a nUr ~iM Y - J Consent Agenda: ` > Approve Council Minutes Business Meeting: F > Public Hearing: CPA 96-0002 - AKA Business (Ray Valone) a ~t ^ ~ Y > Public Hearirng: Annexation - Hatch ZCA 96-00_ (Ray Valone) ms 'S X+eF - a'~t§~trT+~ a Y3 ~Y+r a~, i^+ - ' - it £ R a x }'c. } 3 - r' -XV r,„i~ tkC z ~1' -4 vr~'~ts a ^s < Ar Si.rz~~ r e x r ux a4 aaz" t A to ~x ~ f _ tx x"~-~-~•(-rT>" v~sf„ ' ~ _ r 77777777 s ~4 9~ ywr a - C r -s` r~ XP_ Z 'p -A r,. v _ y 3 MUM, s~ t? r # 'n N- 4 "a3s r p ^p' s y S -r sue"' J `a~ i 9 } I V1 Zr*44 Z' i ~14"^4`F~h^,c~T~a-•.9 `°~"•r'£": £ m-..n-rr-a-~ap.~ _ i.yis, ~ F f r t~ ' l { i t r y#1 r ~ k L r v l f 4 ~ i i t'r ui v " , .u r: ~ { bh ] { }y .r ir'tE •r, ~'~i 1 ~ { } r ',m.~i. s~ ~i ® i t Y,E. ( )r i 4', _13SY .7 r~:T 1 S. a d l r y ,71 t `~1 7 ~ ~ ,5' ~ ? r ..l~. , , ,E r• y~N a ,t, t i n 1. ~ ° ~ ~ v f . ~ i i~i irk ~ ~ ~ k, ~ i4, MV, :,>uu ;s...r,Er r r'. .•E n o ~ ~it,.,;l gnt`at-ax,nsH .ry" -tt ,~L+. YF+"a °Y'. kp:,.. 6iq; 'S? .v;! q' .+rt ! d< k".!4 `+~a5".~fi: ' 800,,da u~:' s.w kak t t ~.7^ 4;.."rt9: r.7: C Y'f":- `9}~~ a,; :tai ='+-~",t} da ~.a $'i ~,pu. a.. g~+$k", •<;a^4 ~"'-,'"~'kt,*~„--,a,~ ~,r., n;r. 1f t . l 4 I s ;v,„., fzk .r,• wg+.:. ~ > ~ `P~,ap '3~+i ~ ~t,^`' .rkY~ iF',t ` c"G - -5w , Yd,:.~-: a r ~r, ~ L { - ¢go r5'f PIT, , a,.E~atM.„.ei~2,,p-„~,>',°°. tq,±i~~~,y'.~§~ ~~i .qra. h , x• .'4 s~'.as' r.F, a ,~~a c:'i~$~'~. ,~°h,~~° .G. 'r • .'4~?.z,.,...'~'va. ^,,*te~„a4,,••~,s.°.a~ ,fir ,L.: .•,td'1< y, i•.~;")',+.,.`},f +§'+'`i ~,a;M 1:i "°'S!^' ;.,fi' ~ .ry ~.i": +~.a~' .~"M a S.$..~p tv pS f7°'" ~ _.,I~Pr~,, .I- +4„' S'ra °.^~•,y'"4`y',g'°p.n, ,~irv.. ~~sii.,P, ,ha, .3..s Y,.'!i'.r~a2^rr .f .U'I.,.N„st, d*''.s~`~i f 'Vi'i.-:.~`"'s,,. ~r at"•+,'.,x, ,.x#3 ,F •,s~^;, r, aj',.`"e sr_'E .rs„.,x,.,'6-*v`q;nR an r~, r~af ~ tai. $ "•.Y 't S. :r . cyr, c;,i Ys :4 sa4, , rR~ . 't~.;.,•'-'n,„. `F a:, i'S-..a}y 4: n 5. S'. AA 2"rdl 4%•^. A '~5"' T, yy~~ 'L3 `ta~ N~ i L bY• ~+"i^. ~ „H a}. ~ 'M ti,'A":5 'It.. ~.y'. a'. G- h.;f • k+, « °4i.'~F~ , .Sx~'w', ,t<`°.:+~' ;1$;.:m. S:~ s . Rrx f ^ :,Y <?:';ns. Y:.,- . r, r'...r a,~ , . d e u`sa , w~-°.a. ,3 r , a,s, s# + .r :.Y::.'. ,r:W 'a " Sr"d"+, a:. a'., t u.~ 8:~".: k.7 , ` :'a < . ,gym,., _ .,'a, a us:S. k~:+A i`';,.n"•'r..+R~, :w. - e: ' t, - ~r'srry.urs. s', k'. -f°•".~d';,. Y.«, . `I, r, All S'. ..a• v _ aatt g, ' a, ar ~ ' -^~ry, s::r ;s ?s'`- y55;'+.a , . { s.; j '4 ar• , t'3.4,„ s^ " s r, - , c ••ci±. '~Y$;Yk , , E 1 , >i > [ ..x ".J, ,Tx i • t'1~, .7ate° + # '''Z a r ~~e aa,, . +y rcft tti• _ ,.S,y, s. ,r ',1he. `1'f 4 'lµ av'^i WN~r If'" , 1:, ,~vr' qY~;$+'i}`.''0 40, Ft.r k.#-rll, "uM" ?,j~"... a.t~'s':.. t 'tom .+^9 ~r i. .'Tt; .rkx .z. e1 z x >F z., t•: r+}'s,.>~,. ,1 Y; ek°. a~ r,. ~..a# e"f ~ubl~ F, .7Stt^~ 'M~$.";'4 >a^r..rvy ,'~a•`;`„'r°a...:,r.~ .,x r, tt, Onto 4: .`_'?a'..s5~i,.,. a' 7 .,t "i'tw ° a• . s °n' •C. d", ¢4'. !3. k _<qa, . 4, ..`t„ .•r~" .a%4- rsu,rp",~ rE r N. r'~'•`~.'~e 4 ' .1` • h OMAN", .a...,,, . a. ,•'arc~, ry„ x ' G£ arm '4 ^ir r! '1 >y ,i x 7N -";~,-.5 '•.°Ya%'"^ta'"•,4 3Y :`P^-k .a, •+t„rc .t,. ,=tics xi .4• '~1~^; J : Y x, 2"' fi ,vim rF { x*.P Y`ro:~ 3 s,a".- .a j,, y r. 5 it N5-~., .~~=R tx', .xi, ~i'> ,v ,::e. .a. C'' =irk- q.",N,•-` ,•k - .7 .fvo-" S: -,A:. .r t r.:, ..t°' , 4.'f•'m- .d'`' -'c~'"+': & .5~, ' ):,ws`3= r_ ...drr' -.k rJ.r :fi': ,I^ ,ry.z C^ ~ ~fv •,a. ,f R. +t~'w - 1"n y., w3 .r, . 7 ar Y , fir. • y, J, : 4t?'a, k , u°N ' c, °.+v-_ i a- IRV S~<-, 5 i" ,:n" .S'..f ,fir, s.,?„• „re s -i ~,avst3 •t~~. ''xr',AMA,,~„?a,.~.*~°«"'`f~'"ax,..t~aag: .rr ,~:::""',~i~..~.,.vr., _ _ '`uvSS,ror3~:a<:"~ahr~wu~s.~r~i,.n- vS~.. -^•°SS:.r:s..~.~...>~„r.:.,.~,...r,~-a,~.r:~'~ a.~.s:.x:,. ,rr ter' ~'a ~~>a u~ 'tY bwr,.pyyfs k,R ykx'. aR?.~ N „na j7. i5 {Y 4 - t - i t„-,~ t•4v at` a 't tia,"e r c -;'~k`++ "v r t- ay'xM S I`..;,.#,a d L',[ ~'✓r4 +r~ s r } r t iL, " r skf'" Y~ y7, k ta'£syR ~~n t•7`,F xt r }y r' g , 4 5~# ~ i r -t Yf h~ y f k >A Y y t 1 sy y - J 1 t~ e r t V r y Fn,l y, k t , 3 ~ f~ T ff N ~ 1 d N f t', O d f a 1 41 L t i Y- -7 L 0 ~ - ~ ,r{ v ~ 3 m tw r i '8 yv `C $ x 17 } > V O i m F - C i i y d pp s L - 04 ~ O O .'t ~ r i ~ ~ 7 4 M r I' w N 9 Z' a 1#-4 'eq N F a; c q ~a1sa!'y 4Mrru rktF ro+ak' t .Ol.A A AA i,y ks s r"4'` f ,~F7 TA'~i'~ # - 0 3 r t l f , h' + - y a crk x+'w'' r` -nu~+~ ,~}?y~~•a i a ° }k"iE^`r 'cc. r , ? < > `i tr ' S,sYya 'CgG'f„~ST-fix d.,.'}, t, / t °.-•r (,:f r 1 ""`CC P d qs bai a+~ ;a , S ur ~3d sk Ica ~,4r d, 1 r 'aw ~ ,y a_ 1, e .o,= a " 'sAx~~}k.+ ,'pwy4a,7 =S z £ } a{~s"`;'jL - _ a a - E a! c,., .,~u`(t+,'`S"w-,.><^°-r^~r"~.,.'.,...'^_^n.,^,..•*. ..f.,.y ,.~q-,.n.. .$3 y t t 2 ; „ : ?dva ,i 's.,_ y :t•'r" '.-sr, t -r,- .r#;, p .ra 77 1 fr LJ r*,-~ •I ! 't - +aa•- a..ra -,.5 ..fJ"'•~'.3:-n'- v=+k~' 'rx W ~ ,n "y EC•. av°T' l .:"q` ,abr 5'..dr:a. 5 a* i~ R.,.. <r•ar,x< . s , rte` 4 n".}J"-rL+ fl,';r,,.,.•,.~ y), Y a t "v'ii'- i f S vtv. a i 7. Ps frv F:v~: i ~;rA E Yr' W -,1,- T'Y . k. Ap, ,Y fi'2. ,t*" q ll~ r r ~k4k •+a, o- a":[~ - .7E„n .F SI tn4 fin' •~1.r, 'Fr :su'.nY G :'c^>:: $a i4; 5 IN, r. .:"'t,. a .a. .a "44 fir+r, is s, „}riS x:NR!", . f , ",Yd'f• 1+1 e•7'•,, :"ar S'[ 5`,tl:,' ♦k... ,~f rv«U „i, Y . C aro '.1M ~ ~•'E A" `9x~ • -'M"^~~ Y, a rE ar< .f° '..V" n'AS s.+4„ ~ `,f:, r3. my ~a ° t' r l,n~ . $i, ,u. sa•a 5>ti a •~:a P -r;: _ ,s.e` a'fF • ~ a.„ tt~~,,'~i r , ,:v"' :rt•.. „f.r ~ aczhr., ,.,.,r r ,.I*. - a., , k~ , } mot,^,t 'a': fax .,p ~t r,•~'::° , r. w a q;Ss, 3-, br +':f•-, ~~~tr' r x~- r .,:R .,,J ~..".•.V .n,s .,a, ::'•r^-i-my. r' "r G` °.°:?t s•>•' .r;r ~x, -•ar,., -a+~uT.iw - akd Y t - rs~. ~v~~ ~-t~.a ,rrx+i; -Vr.",•t. .'.,.a•~ ''ss. U:?'=vf:,, >;n `5 r.a,, ~ .N1 ,n, .t # y.~~' •,•f.., 'C'r:<>; ;y^ 1';, i•a'a•'r 1:,",., w z -~f•w, ,yyvSr• Sri. f~ xM .:T ' , ? 'i•^, « 5 .c - - - ~ Xo! i '~-x ,aS .d,'„ ..s .haw' '•'~a li6'r:, ."FG .:r k'sti<,R v~'?kg1'~.''-&. ~i- '.•s":P"r,. r 1~ '~5 ikw'+p,,,,y~ N.kr.s. '"•ii^ 0 'r','r ,r .,~^yl+' .Pa.:FV Yf,,• .FS'3 .;ie` 4k. 4 f- S. ~b,y, .t~~ t a - -'F,tr„ •Ewt> +>s ,.k; pp~••~`.'sa, ~ ~,.MS= a , ,,.-~.:u.,:i mow, .r.,, N'R2•t ;t ~:r9t ' t` ~~s:".. • '•y°~,~' ~ • sy .y" }~•""rT.S`.'"'~ ..t. ~r ` n . 'e'x ,y., . ~ • ..,,.yr. Uv a° .+u", ..d, 1 . ~ _ a~ x u~*•:<e - , s.. 3 t=" . s - °`s=fr'^- 7,. ~S yc ~.;r ° ~r x ° kti•'. s ` °k '$r" ...3, fSitr k , • ai•. 's , , ar . rt' _ 3~ >a. e ''"ro;,,=...,~''. r: ,<,-7 - . r w. ~,F .,r S'.-~- ._'§r. x5,w a:~ ,Gr ~F: ~ {j+.. rL'>"^' 3• F~ 'r .,"°~,,5~`c •:.!•1`•;t, x e '"al "'0.r. ..r '.a, Y„ 7. t'c 7,,, .".~,a e?d s.., t R n, ° w r „A5 3 3 5w ° L7 ,.y.a t,.,. _ - 6 n ,••;r': ~ , r „ r,~' . ~ 1,,,, a.Y,,~;'_" },.lL°•Xt < n+a:~' 're ,"r^ ~ a. ~,kq, -~'r~'~v • St„ ,.wk"~ ^ b 1,. ~ . ril, c. I,u- ,.,y : u"+'S'J• fi J ~ f ~ i, v 6 ~5.5 Ska F . 3?'. n C ~i n 'q~Sr>=s R. ! 7- h ~.4" qg pF yt~r+ rJ~ aS!' S°° s . t ..pe*+e.r ,,yr,~ •f`•°'°' .I.a , i,. r< r t :..a . E^9 „3x,.,,-a..- , ^ .~?J 7 , ,req?r d .ya ,r .'k~rs w: ° ^>i5,.<t - ~~..~~ii°"9_ -r ";5a.('uR°; ,v s. °,?•i .s-, .r;rF- e 4': y .ti v^ 1' 'ar , +-~r 4 d5`;_ .Ss /`~Ty ^Y 4'ry Zvi. .-K,a< $a `3, ~•R 4'r " ':'3- P4- 'SZ., •[~'~,.,><,..hK s° r ."his.' rPa~ t,,..r ...A ~'f'..z.~. ,~.sG .,W tt .n , e,r r,! „ -.rv, , a.:~~iv"rk q'*o.?'°'; :.>xnt'~tid'-t~; •,n„ -C""`~t'^''+~:"- .<,h ...'t4., r„ ,r C::s: . I..^,i-t G".41 ~ f - r - f , _ S - j - Its - '4F , - a A y tF t;< 3 c h m r t, X 3 £_,42„Q, 1 -4 - 11 . u "T tom., ~ s~ {t z . } _ 5 2, - r 4„- h s i~Fax c ? , r .f s ~'s ~ w -tip R P3~'.`'F+ - * : } _ y S j2 ,Y T. `Lm ~ - x n 5 1 -MW - if ~.n ~~r~,V m-% Q.k (Note: Items swderlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are x I Z scheduled to follow-up a Council matter or request.) I t ;,x ~ { Date: July 23 1996 , 11 I - 5 , 3z- -,k-_ 'FL, .a•-a``£a ~ j Type: Business (TV) ~~F I M ~R~ t - 1 3 Start lime: 6:30 p.m. Study Meeting x _ 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting x ~1 ' t F, ' t s %N-W ~ xx # z - , ,,X` - 26.10", .x-s f~<~ x Y Study Session: > Agenda Review c; ' Consent Agenda: ~~~Ix~ s } Y 5 , > Approve Council Minutes Z~,,~'~'¢~, . h- ie ~ r` ~ = y Business Meeting: ' :_1 , I 110 "2 11 11. 1 = t' > public Hearing: Charter Revisions (Cathy) Iz~ t' r`~;= , > Public Hearing: CPA 96.0004 Sattler (Ray Valone) ~ . ~ N , ; , > Public Hearing: CPA 96-0001 Bledsoe (Ray Valone) I ~ _k 11 t ~ ~ 3~ Y .y -t'- R k ^f s'~tr 3 y y € t 1 } *s 8 ' .~k -y- - 6 - t'p'-^ rr q 4 - _ t F- ` ,V ,g 11. S'N.§ Y,, yiPY,'Ag S b y f'S kG IT`x '@f 'x -`zc S 4 . fey i'k ,1 -f, F ski 4 l F .1 _ a r - - t I k= Z= " , ~ ,1 gT M.-- t J ~iM ~ a , , . ~ k _ ,tf~ 0 , ~ ~ 4 . - I ,,z,~kle,-- ~ - - , , ~ , ~r, 6~, , - Jim-11 : mrza.,µ4 Ci t?'` F _ l a _ - k r k - .,.€`S' 'Y 'a?. "~'x5+~ t t i t^ 'EF "+`f yet 's 4 ,t ',t _Y~ _ _ , r £ ?rte a~ r' s Rte-, _ g s L r-- x, _ y_. _ _ y _ .y _ -k t.~41 r. -~~rg~~,y'~ .r + ..al• L 3 r - ~ 1 t . i 4a; 1"G I I n-;:w ' y .P , e t ,r, it' 1 ,h x t _ ~ ,r"n - ~ ,'dr `•,~1.': ,+.n T lrr, r r , .,,.tN , •..~'xr'.' 3 - . ~ h .k a' ~i~.° a ':.„,r ~ v a r x' w x. c G, :=r.a.a~ + Yk'P«+rl,• xl, 'Y9'v,'~'«' ><-v"8,",. t . ,yak - k:. -ub,~ ~ # ok < a -0.`r,. r' t~ re rr:a -t ~ t :4,044, ~i,,, ' ~ , s-, ! ;s,.': * ~ .3aPr'„ry , 2w ~ ,H ~ti .3, '!h5 p'~. K .<~'i,~isc v. °.':r` St"1.i>k~#° ..~y„„m~Y>. " K, .,3.. d?.:4, : +fs - ' } ^rnir ".*p '~a$,,~ .:~"r ,g ~~k"~4 «n t,. c~, 'a'+, .„-s''~~:,a,. e~<','.h ~'t?'=^ " ~`4 - ^.i c ".w P. . ' .~r-: t. ,.k'~r'r, • 3 i~y~; ` yt ' t ' 's. y, ~ z ,~w.l"r `afY:a . s'~'~, •R~~'~ °a"t:t r"" :a.., a- `5 ~''j r aY•, M a is:'73'a, ~~`>ti"':i r~^.r``a• ^ v H' ~E% ~ „r<c~';ax}^i.rs~;^.~'''"'•` ~ 43~,,~,. Gt'A+ '~~rx 'Si<'. r . . -w~~Y*.'^' A , 1;..,.i i ~ ~ r. ,~M1S, •r >4r+ 5- ,F,• ~;t„ a , v ~3' a ,'r~+"'« . ~'3~~, ~ " J' .1 ~.f ~ .''tit •,r:r~~e~l,,, x. ,_x•'K,~ ~~"s .x~. s§' , W,.v an~~;"r~ ns ~ ,,~}F K' x. c ^.r '~x,>i" y ~ F= ~',1TM 'a. ro-~ .m';i+~„ F 'x . ;3U,.: 16' ._,x ~ r,> A~:a*'"{p -ky~,`v~'s%~3. ,.<t~ „~~_,1 ,y¢' "'r s ~f ...{-tx., d_.s- aa~3'`'~#s~'d ~°.-a, 5. ,,r `e, aps•'f,jr', »?~:v'~s'~a4~s.€ :~~r<' r. ..a'~ ,.yg t{'zi .A .~t~• sk,. N9" a-r<T"F:. 1rv"r,^r'.a ~?sr+<'.•x € :3 's?ra .k aita„`e'"i5-i--`?~5•e.. r![, -X`s, .w'>, ni".. "r~;;5y 1 rrs ; ~';a', ~u: ` ~ k ,r.~, ,.5 a., X44=~tra~, '`q:FM"~''% °m. ~H,. .t;.. „r-, :t,,,l-,; ,r,. r~~, . , *t- C ' ,r)~x ~,.e ,t4p,re + , ~a'.a a ^~-,y:•yk:, ..Rh E!; ~ ra ~,r; z,,~',z e ;~€,~,a•, `f, ,,«m_{f"x, tX .d Mrs .5 ~ >~S .`a ta r~ h u sg3" .t+~',r-L~bF,• .v,~', a, ~n §,Y'r ':,,,rt:~.~ v i:' '~.,s ,F ~4 "~Y.-A v° 7'q~f~ ~ra 1 me:a»;,` ~rrsu~"'`;s;3r'^~'F+'•"M ;hys "~'`~:;...~`rii, ?3 '~•r...<;,:•.r,: ,K; :sa }f,[r] 'M' t K +5x t:t. ~yA :M~ J FfY' • :1 rt qn, ° t .an. nv.t>,... IC r S F.,. j..s a . !i '7^'~ , . • t+ a t 5y ' ~x a.s. ; ~ - ,"a,z,r.. y~<.,, a , T > . tith: •.~r :.;~,zx~j . ' d... '-•ac., ~ ~ "Yd " i tr .;n'., sr`:> a L x~ +'y, ,e^•»^:+," . .s's,w r E . +y,~r. k ~,„°<:=::::r•<_ ' 'h l- p: I,t ,U .t 4~``"1 . ,a5 ' 'I"~u f :f r, _ a " ,'4 '"$yg ~-'`r~s, f~ >d., ~w ' v~• q . EYE j 9 , ar ~ 1. >-,',fi€',1+ -t ":;tR~v :r .N a. *e ri^• :,~i, t .t• .g r; . F.?a;..-V ;e*',F~,""„'~ a§•^ra m~~r' ^4 h:9. ,i, ,v,. Yr.N .,~'r ~ S.. `'a.,.,, :ec xt. ,a„ _ :.<s. ~„v. a 7. rs-.. t ,>msr°" ^4-b, ~r,x 't ai ,+g• ~"'s~? .-0r `fit`';,. 4 W .a w"e.,,•y'ht,. ,s.:'°-~ ",-''II 'dy.wy .eA'"''~, ~a~_?,s`s a, c`• ~r~ ' "F` .1~ 3 u ,a' f: t{ :z#`•', , ~ , s- '4' ' h , `i":..a-~-u,~4 .=.:'v r"~, ^ r• cr 'a~<.e:,., ..'r. ,k~. '-st` ` ?a ro+ ! a , .,ts d,N S, .gur .C~~. .yY3su r .,'r.`~`°:. s k z f, .«ra, .i ~Y' . ~ br 5 r..a.,A„ .ar . € ,r,, a, , J.,h ~,Y,~'" t v . v e~'~~,'.,,,.. v,ta-. -3 . .-:4c a>- -,~~,'~•",n,v .'•a ,~,k-. "L'a.. «'<.9'°~ ~GF .s'~. ,$,A, 4:.,°3^ .r. %r-.'„"••"-rJ.:'}':' - fir" • r. ^e f„;,~ ~s~. - f's,'.,;:',:,:,..'r::a.;,~. ,fir S k. ,ie'•"Sr s, :kx:°$ ->4rv.°. , A! ^t `r . tr.,, : >•s...-, , nom, ^ _ y~, .-5.w 3, € - n., r. < < ~ r, i.e t x. ey . {y,:,",rzn «.h.,~.; f ",i,,,;.u ' it :°.t. , t t°.4 M1 e Yi , .$cti{ a a'S. r,~v .:..y _ i.,r x n. < a e r a.. -x. ~...nx . ,v, . ~ ~ 46 ° - '16 -n' W :'L"•_,n ,x.v,•:~a 7 of s .r~s ,a11.- , + .y~', r.<+, +~sS v ~ ,T, t - D" . ,d J.. ! v 'p`+. , f f~ i~. s.,, a~4 ..x C..r k „ ~ - r t`', ,ei . i..'y - xt1%- x 3-' ~:a'e~ki'r~~ "=~4~.=~ ..,gkrara+wu~ v.~.v:~,a&~,.~a~'u~ `H;^:...w-c'~,_~~-~__ r ~=`a'i~4rs.a»wa,~>A~°'~:t~~,,,., .r ~,.~4w a ~-s'~ ti - ~ ~r ski + s aI-"""i .a7 "~'1vr ,~c3•..v..,_..s..,y..m,, \ 1 '"~."aa:l!~~RR~'re, j ~t~€{s s4,y r €#'i`~Y a i s 'x~ €r t`~ Y,+• ~ I 'r' ~p,r e'J~, sN~+"sGk~t ~~krfz )ss'' s 4 a rl S yC ~ d 7 x 41 v3 ~ a e# ~ b ~ 1 1 e i 7 1 d Y i J -,t r I L 41 „U ! a m 7 F R q I~. N d Q~ 4 f 1 f R 04 O N G _ r tr r. D 1p O 4 ^O Hm O r 11 00 > C T z \ N ^ A Q S ~p 4 S i~ q f A +n 'p3 41 atl 0 s i ' C Il'"" r dj = L' L ,fit. - 1 f al " 7 d ati N d M m O s ~y 6. r r t q 4a A dYS ii a2 y'41 y Q H m r k + ^ S"~ {r } l i d kJ, y ~ Y[ E F ~ tt `I ~ s ,TM 2 L r' ~ ~`i2 IA 3q a a 1, a r x+a L _r ~ 1 ~ i £ #~`+leA~J.s>i,s; t #.~Or,I Y', e f+t r' r~ tFP7 4t i4t tiro y ~,'',td"md 5'°'r k 1° 4 x y , {s;r+4 r t ,a t,:'+~, '~s' r +'r'~; .9 eg. `t°~u-,r• ~ aav ~ . ,.+,,^ua- _ _ . r4,. 't a.. s ~ ..'n;Yw a,'r - _ i ~iy +"<`ry, v~ f. ti,"I''. ,rzYJ u- ~i` P.arv~=a' y.,• L' r:k^ _ sauna. at' `A I a ,r k, - t r.zk. ~ 4 s~ r , k I, F. . ytr'r alL t?J M ~ I g f ~ T c r9 e d'i' w ~'M ~ W °Y' vf'~.v- 1 4, T'~•, '"tt:=-i 4 . i xM. w a p,, d~1,v i4, • rv, k., art" -4,".%I l 1, . i 3 .lF" •9:: ><,',~$i+tx. 'I" .~6 t4 5 .h: ~ '4 ~ C ~ ,.'L- 1.Id ~T~.•'. w~,~ vfb+'SP", '""T. 't.1 . * t2 rv,tr • Yf • av ::,t. , v5 w,q to •'.t` i',^w„ t+M t D 'R MOM OW t .a"r~f 1 er , _=n ~v , E'e v. •`'ra. ~,•"w:'' .anw t r r °Y,. ~ . t y s ++r y .:.r Yw A, 1, • '~~??.tt ••i !~~q 7 M. :"L aLri ,~3„i :;yt'~, ~:~"'a%'F^ !'it ~y g f,rz.s+•~ ~ tA,µ k~,w p • b :fit: a~Y'S• ~2~' kfl g ~.isr".i: ..3"; . "'ya•'r~;'M,e., ~ k~ r'rs:.,. e yr,.,+,~ - s '."ri ' d t 3;i w;r h3r, .hx-~ 4`"rt~0.•t"`°-s ,a. '"fit r~".1 h tx. s:Y..,,;.., z .r y .°r6''y1y 1' y ^.4"'n- rW $ ^J.Y +~ul ,`k K• nF,'re r. ' °ki R <_i a•5a'j •-1ra i.~ 7`Y:,tm'i'..' fps,-'v A F':,t :F° ''4'r..e.J' .,.4 c r-nr> .r=.~,ot ..e2 •.,'v:q,.. ,crW i#~r' -.q'.r>'f a.l'•t. ,::~Y` b u k . s w€, r, s r 4•<. ..^:t.. 4 . ~r'td.. -,a'`,,: ~w.kr ;'v ~ • . ':j'. ..zr?' • s . 1., s. .i. w~ r > ,,.^.r. 7ti". 4t''; z e 1'."5 r..,, »iY #•s_d`a, 43 s« >t...»' z''t:p, _ r ~ x: ' `u <ra +•a`. ~:-e'" s,.•+.~'s+,„ " J, at-x Iz'r t . - A'~ ~ as t:,,,~a M•a».,f r ~rS i'''. t c4 "gar ^.,rr:, '.t.. .wt s't r+ J<,f~"~' ~tSYM 'Lb L ~ t:ts " 4 k~'4 < r¢':/ ✓O+•+ :.#d~' t3 i"'r'~ ' r ~%i"~2'a:. '•°i>":e."~'t", t a "dk W k .,'>f'-Y ,.1.-A,, h r .ti "T't• ! +3"4.° ^F', .,.'^,n,`r,c, ".;,'''r. q y", Fa.< eC,v' G•~ "»~r =•r'p,- f~:~a-. rt' c!'A'~.ts,d.,^ ,y: #a.<i,,. :,t•°tr "s<i t,"1' ,r.~+#b ,#'x ~ k ~ y,al t, zt' sar~x, '',`d`s'i~' i -:n,-~,,., ,'k ..2 r,~~N!<s'~" ors ''r..". +s. $'w. .';,ti-` '"f~ a,:, .~'?.'w .!Y' -ti<;.•' m•,.:~'-'~*„ , J L f. "t` w ac r ` r. +f, "a • R' x •PAn., si>tr<'`r' .;J< T 'a' f,.. 'd ! ' F" , b: ~S •tj:t'`° 'a ,4t'. a.5;? f .+'SY`t,Er nr:.' r;'^"(tiFl, :5 ' 4= ' .u~ 7°t. n N 3 C` ~ T * 1.-1 '"k' •5' r.- ,.~sa~"u :i r. , ...F: ,":4 a5,r, rw e M,n„Pa`x P r~ t'` .q.:.«.,x r,: .wJ•~-r:^`- ..S<u•o- t r" `-t~ •w'~*aa:. ~k'3-"a.e;,. v,~r f. '~f~ u ~'i`.-"It ~ n -,.i~T, 4... *L: ^ 'v1K'r. 1"S"., 1 ~:"w Y{•'~ is ~T r4•, UF"• ' f +'4`n i ,,.i: gg r '!.rr•, wt,,. ,jw`'> +:v a4• ~ :r'-.k$'~ .i'.5 z"?,.# ~ t.s.. 's`.a ~ 's;: Y x . a'h•, ~'L . W: sS<. i:i. °L:°".3 _ } '.4 . r~ " q,;..?z >"q~j - r _ a k" - > , L : A ' :h- , . F' , a Jy , 3 - {i• . T'#Ga,> xv.: v n ,n_~±x?R.-,--,r...,xaF~i., .1~`p:•r°i".~r~i.r~e f. ~r,, r-, L"'t , . 7 , , r-, a ~....s k-tr- , a -r . 'cz' , , a , ,ric..,., , ;,,r,. .,,4 . , a, . _ ..r„ , F7W*04*0b=W"A="G r z u _ E- ti r his 1'ti , Y as sS-ry - r '3J't •'p- cox - S Y Y - ~ , s* ¢ 1 _ - t - -fix 7- - 5 -k 3 r }^",.k. R. sum "t ~4-~ 5 i. A', - fi.~'lz -1 M}'"4a.a' ~w-..- - "z`&.r -~n- -Stta'fea:'®;a~Las. - x- cam- r'r¢c- I f 4,114"_ 4 , r t 7 e a _ '`f -.r ca s -"sXa~'S Y y- h , h~t } ITEMS PENDING - DATES TO BE SCHEDULED e ' ~ 'i -,l t- t • t , N • Transportation Comprehensive Plan Changes (J1m) " • Surface Water Quality Treatment Facilities - Staff Report on , r~ L& n - x Information Rearrested by Council on September 1995 (Engineering artx a a ' Dept.) x } 'z ' OPEU Contract Negotiations -approval of new contract (Sandy) - c ° t COMPLETED 1- ~ 6 N, ~3 i k Dartmouth LID Financing Hearing (Gary, Wayne) ~F " al • Items to be scheduled after City Vision Statement process is firs 3 T r completed by Council; a s >>o Half Street Improvement P-'.'- ~ "z 3' %cngrneering) i ~ " !R , January 1997: I in. • Develop Annexation Policy; especially for island areas (Jim) q ,I I 4 , _ Integrate Council Into Computer System (Paul DeBruyn) ~ Ir-,,? - 2 ~ Develop Long-Term Water Resources (Ed, Bill) 4 r Review City's Street-Light Policy (Engineering) r " r4y L Schedule Council Goal Setting Session 4 - , ~ r v= s 1 9 . ~ 4 # June 1997: - ~y ~ , ' R~ , r, i' ' s " • Rewrite Tigard Development Code - Bufferin (Jim F Ng~ s r' • g ) V ~,V- a U,E, ~ Engineering Feel (Engineering Dept.) { k~ ~ i - a , • Finalize Visioning Process - Implement (Liz, Loreen) ' j 5. x • Evaluate Use of Traffic Calming Devices - S.W. North Dakota k (Engineering) F~ c ' • Finalize Sewer Extension Program (Engineering) - g Ongoing (as needed) ' Consider Issues of Affordable Horrsin¢ x R, ~ ' • Support Passenger Rail Service Planning throug]Lgard t k , ~ 4 F ' s , • Define/Develop Tigard's Approach to Workinp/Dealing with Metro a Ate i' IL 0 Y z 3 _ra - a ~ - I _ Secure Long-Term Water 5ypplv~~ Y. - ,rrs x Note: - ,s j A4s,,,K g, ~ ~ , rj CIT facilitators and resource teams meet with Council for i hour at the x r" r mt k work session meetings in January, April and September. 3 pFa - t-t G 4 5 . ' ~ All Workshop Meetings - schedule a time for CIT updates and Metro 2040 x Updates. I k - € r i a _ h W;In\ndn\[enngm € r i wt _ ~ - - 11%~~'-- . [ . F i rs R r _1 Lin, (1 - - ic' -S 1 5 i _ , SC • ~ _-1 'S ~P~-iF j-_ L 3 l, , IWO,v'7" :~i~. ~-,A,~, - " " E ~ , ~ ~ - i : , - : , : ~ ~-,"*',-L, ~ , : : : ~i " A . - ,fiy - F - _ -l, a f ~ , t~'Z~~-4 - ~ , - I I - , , . - 4,1, , rx~ - - ~ r g S-1 r t-t'..~ fi r r t k i Ev S t s, T .d 5 C ; - W _ t { Yt ;ii . - - 1. L~ - f , - i - _ ^ Tom! . GT-- . 07 77z t_ r ~J' - - ? 1t1 _-:_.L .z~._~ i~ 1. - - i.. a_Y k.i..- -1.-..-.~-.._~. _Y:_. r, .i. r fir. ",u; 4 p T 7., ~ -a y vim--. - - r rb .3' '`-a.~` - ( • x~ , . 4 41 WC W w, ,V ViQ a"sr' ~~p Sn: ? z.La kt3 Fr Yr s 1 't t', .e1S1 k rw 't- s* i - -L rya. -3 ~ a . ~ ~L !5 r.'+ aw r-' a _ - - x,. 2 r 4 d ' rte F,5s a rI- 4i Yy & _ >2 . S r 2_~ w+ f _ e ra ~ ? ~j t~ kF "k tax.. r.-x'a~ s ~Wgg 10.1 V a IMMI ~1 c ~ _ - -11 _ ~ - x AGENDA ITEM # 3, Q d.h F - ~~U s+ r - For Agenda of June 11, 1996 a > ~ N b } j CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON R F 4tG K, - s g > r .W a ~ , - COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 3 g~ t & - G+ sy, 3-Sa 44 y-1 11 t " ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Appointments to Budget Committee and Planning Commission S,; - - f € - , 1;~ ,;,y- ` U< PREPARED BY: Liz Newton DEPT HEAD OK -CITY ADMIN OK 191'"' 11 ~ 4 - - i~ , FCVM ~ 7 ° ; ISSUE BEFORF. THF. rnT TNrII t rs ' . 7 y - 401 - e x e~.'c^.....MW, , 11 4 Appointments to fill vacancies on the Budget Committee and Planning Commission. ELF f _ x - 4 h i STAFF COMMENDATION µ . ~ ~ ' 4za - t ' Adopt the attached resolutions a M z . - ~ e~ x a ppointing Michael Neff to the Planning Commission and Craig Wanichek to the 5? j -IN t ~ 1~ Budget Committee. ;N, 4 , I$ i dY G 1Gs ~C ~ - N { q 5 ,"I I 9A3 - x ti J'w h~ a - ;rte) INFORMATION 4IJMMARY -R V' Tr r r X i I'VE a r-, r: z°°.n~', q lr { ti _,F. On May 30, 1996, the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee interviewed candidates for vacancies on the c ' ' r J Planning Commission and Budget Committee. Attached are resolutions which, if adopted, would approve the fi a 11-11, - v appointments recommended by the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee. T s k a r s? # g x_ ON4IDFRFD _ k_- - i t OTHER AL.TERT`ATIVFR r t r ` Delay action on the appointments. 5y - 4 r S ii s "mot 5s a' FICA NOTES }~i, y %'~h " 1 K- ~ 11 - 1_ . 111111- "j, - i AR, None J g w' 4 - s f AR ~ s~ d a 5. i,'T'r . RY p - -74- , -s' S - ; i:lcitywidclsum%cappts.dm r "``'ter: is ~ , t„, * i :3 _s'.€e t 4 3 0.f.&}~9 g7 ~ 3r4, r' ~v n { ' - r : s, Y"4`^'! 'x - ~ ._.A,, c, ? - Y a ~hai X Y ,J 7rq,' - Fx'~#' ~x - S4 W"~ r 1. 'F: '7''''~ r - 11 11 2 - --max"- -°.-m.,.,.'r~cc'crixti ,s ,sr'mz ,~»a....~. - ra - rvr - S `7., a s . , 14, Y 'Xz' >r v ; z t" a a . 2 ,'a,' - - v* ~r { i -1 - is -ms's' 3` ~~)5y, 'FtkP 5.1 - r, < - r x yr .gYn m x`~ -F 6 - ~I ter ' x - X ~ 3f ~,JP <s'-1`9: r 1 < f t 1 yaf~7 r jtst L: °St+ fw y L _ J F ffA ; F 1 "I _111 - {4,d5'i -'5.., i a 5 f T'_- < t "sid4 ge3 - 5: A : v F Y 4 Y t Y" l 'v YJ ^R T., 3., 'tl`~ j'v. i t 11 P1 QA's 14,-~, ..i r - k aty~ ~x i ~ .r z vz a~ i~. at a- - -5i..- , 1 - .4 y _r ; - . - -r._ - -jPWRWjM - - . - -C' - . - r 4" 111150~1 - - - `Z Sa'~''~` i 4 7 yl t T - - - F- ~ " , 1, - - - 17 M h Y; z a`.rMg~ x'r h-y-s.•+~Tyr - d rZ ~ t .z a• t r 'v ,t - t 4 S - - , s i S arty - { s Y CITIZEN COM6llTTEE INTEREST APPLICATION } ,tOtt ~ rat "A vi Name: Craig A. Wanichek Dace: 213/96 - _ - Address (Home): 11722 SW Tallwood Dr. Res. Phone: 590-2763 4 f z . y Y a - ~L r Tigard OR 97333 ,r yak-s t ~-y`7 J 1" ,tya Address Bus.: PO Box 4412 t Bus. Phone: 75-3905 r Y Yu` . a~~ i ' Portland OR 97308 lf { i Length of Residence in Tigard: 10 Months Suggested By Catherine Wheatley b ~ ~ - ' t E Where did you live previously: Lake Oswego r ~3 Educational Background: B.S., Economics, University of Oregon I r ' Occupational Status and Backvrn_ und: c w~ , ; -y. - - -rF r _ s • I currently work in the Oregon Corporate Banking division with U.S. Bank, as an Assistant - ? { r 4 Relationship Manger. I have worked in the financial services industry for the last 5 years. ~ "M vk " r Presently, I analyze the credit worthiness of companies with revenues between $10,000.000 and _ 5500,000,000. Daily, I assist two relationship mangers with the administration of their loan k - f " -~avR < r portfolios. I have been employed with U.S. Bank for approximately one year. ~1Z,~ _ 'F§ ` z x .rs'S k, R a' .'£y~ -a r Previous Community Activity/Organizations and Offices/General Remarks: 4 , x ~r G 1-- 4 ,}R 3 ~a„K3 Y-.`'BSS q I strive to be involved with each community I live. In Bend I was a student representative to the F.~ , , -11, -11 School Board. I also participated in the Band Rotary Tree of Joy, delivering Christmas Gifts to s n underprivileged children for 6 years, While I was in school at the University of Oregon I advised . q n s' 5 the President of the University concerning scholastic and community affairs, l also served on the . -1' wl, r University of Oregon Student Senate. I was awarded the Centurion award my senior year for ` , ,I - t i outstanding leadership and service to the University and the community. As a professional ink n ~ tt ka~ v ' , - ` Eugene I organized a Tree of Giving for a two deserving families and coached a fifth grade boys' E' 5 g , .-'&t Q basketball team. Since moving to Portland/fgazd I have been very involved in the Oregon Club - of Portland, a group for Portland area University of Oregon boosters. I am currently in the second ) ,~h . * year of a four year term on the Board of Directors for the club. Last winter I also coached a q "1 I 1. Tigard seventh grade boys' basketball team. I made a bid for the vacant Tigard City Council seat , t } F-f but I had not lived in Tieard for one full year. I will continue to strive to be actively involved in n ` 1 i P any community that I live. A" I E" Board or Committee Interested in: I would be interested on serving on either the Budget-Comm ittee or the Planning Commission. ` - - K Any other pertinent information you want to share: z~ It would be an honor to be appointed to the Tigard City Budget Committee or Planning Commission. I believe my experience, enthusiasm, and hard work would be valuable assets to the e v t x City of Tigard. [ am interested in serving to help make a difference in the quality of life in the fir, = ' t,- Tigard area. Through my commitment to other groups I believe I understand the time ' }1 . 5 I x - commitment and energy it takes to be span of volunteer citizen groups. tt N _ w t - In my current position at US Bank I make decisions that often times involve complex problems ~ ` t~~ h r i µ " using both data and personal contact. I listen to the issues of both the individual businesses and k i { ti ~ ,,p' i'{ , the Bank and thin I salve to reach a comprise be wean the two groups. The skill of identifying - ` { ,r the salient issue or issues and developing a solution, I believe would serve me well on the ' , ' ~ ; ~ I ' t r K committee or commission. :have confidence my communication skills and problem solving i r 41 s Y~ t , ability would support the efficiency of either group. It would be an honor to be considered for an " ,rte 1 v, r - ooening on either the Tigard Budget Committee or Planning Commission. € f k, - [ Wit- - -ya_,~•s `tee' 3t h t n yam' c. - 't t 11 1"~F.- _ rst v $h L - k) 3J °rh''t~ 3 - M f'M'yu3'N. TF's'r ryYr:, ays+~.m+i' m +'f ~wY t £ ' _ '.l -11 - if- +Y 4V 1 j f V sfi N 7 f - ~ . - ~ . L~~ - Lr . , ~~L, ~ - . ~,--,,j -",'i'i" ,,-'v,~t,~q~,, , T ! f t ~F ~ 4 - E , , L - , 1~1-~, _ ~ L , , _ _ ,r n - ' - ry-y t P t i F - 'S- gI 1 t ? - , M , , " _ , ~ ~ : , - . - - - ;A;`-"-`L`--11'-`1`i r ~w t tea. . _ r-+..~+-.•~+...~.-~~..~J!`:.^r"m~. _ _ "^-^"•~~.v...~~,.--a .a~ ;l - -L : _ ~.k._ .L... ~e t..w:_. _ -i i_r 1_ ~.i..~ .~_._.a ~Y7•-ci'..t_ _ .i.J_.Y. - _ _,.I~_.7_z_- 3 .~'.~lL i s zg v7 4~ a~ f z 0. - 5v r s lf~ - , s s g,N fit,' a ' "C - ~,pn ~X~, Craig A. Wanichek 1$ 11722 S. W, Tallwood Dr.~#~ r Tigard OR 97223 t,} -z r .1 1, g~ i z 503 590-2763 Home - A wa 503 275-3905 Work" " cap e- a- FSDerience ,Q-'~, :c. f* ~;?t,';.# y _ ASSicfnnt Pe:&..vII9hip f::i e.•y'. i~ - -'.a.~.s,_ Manager, U. S. Hank of Oregon (3/95-1/96)x~ ' y s ~ * Prepare annual loan reviews and assist Relationship Managers with administration of loan w .i5 tM'* ~aI r v c r ' r;T x y _~-ter `4,t~~-,IF ,az4~"`'' -4 st h.'. u'r~ z . Portfolios. Normally process accounts of $1,000,000 or larger and of , X portfolios " " -3K„ , - - ` - ,e sT S100,000,000 to S500,000,000. 4 t-7 t~ } • Monitor accounts and portfolios by examining financial statements and information acquired t N 3 r x during meetings with management r ~ , y u 'Recommend changes and modifications to new or existing loan relationships. a(~ I ii, 3i? r rs -11 5 4 -y r K Financial Advisor, Prudential Securities (4/93-3/95) rix .1 a , n ;f f, * Consulted with clients to satisfy investment needs with securities such as Stocks, s " Bonds and Mutual Funds. - E ^~`'u * Prospected and qualified potential clients to identify if a financial planning need existed. , ~ x - Y r, * Analyzed opinions and data regarding the capital markets. ' ; { '~'h*k"'d u t s ~ s z- r 5 Assistant Branch Manager, First Interstate Bank (7/91-3/93) ~ , f I -~x'~ e V. ' . * Managed the quality of all customer service and internal branch operations. y ti Conducted numerous presentations including, branch sales and staff meetings, and a District Eft;' ' ti4 r wide, Sales and Service Excellence, training seminar. ' , - : - t µ z * Developed, implemented and monitored job performance expectations, quarterl oals, training f t r OZ¢ is 5'r - - 1 t 5"Y zC, 6 and career growth of the staff through motivation and coaching. y g a . ° ~kn g #z{' Bachelor of Science, Economics, University of Oregon, 3.0 GPA (1991) x; 1 t s ~ P~I— a Involvement. aidhit) and `warda• ,2'?*fx,K r Board of Directors, Oregon Club of Portland, University of Oregon Alumni. (1994-1996) r Tigard Basketball Association, Coach 7th grade boys basketball. (1995) f YS'~r g Ef - T ' k Board of Directors, O Club-Portland Area University of Oregon Alumni, 35 and under. (93-94) _ x 1 r Coach, Kidsporu of Eugene 5th Grade Boys Basketball Team. (I992)'r - ' , ` r Tree of Toy, Bend Rotary, delivered Christmas presents to needy children. (1936-1992) € w_ _ , - District Emplovee of the Quarter, First Interstate Bank, (1991) ~ ' Z NN"" { r~_ ' , ~ Tree of Giving, Organized and adopted underprivileged family then collected and delivered y - , - them presents. (1991) f _ ,,I ti - ~,-M - ~3 ,3 Walk America, Steering Committee, Medford, OR. (1991) r j, - ' ~ Recipient, University of Oregon, Centurion award, for outstanding Leadership and Service to -1 w s j , (r . - v N . the University and Community. a'x F , , _,',~'r I " " ,f Advisor, to University of Oregon President-President's Student Advisory Boar d(1991) _ r a ~ ¢ 4` Senator, University of Oregon Student Senate, representing 1700 students. (1991) a President. Phi Delta Ilteta Fraternity (1933-1990) t ' a k 9 } Y EE a-i,~~ , r Student Bodv President. Mountain View High School, Bend, OR (1987) 'Yr $,F ~f a; _a 1 ,a , tt n .4 x s - 'fir°° ,"x 5 'e a L_ k t " G } - 4^ '~zE'` , 1~n>"",...`_... """"^.b„ y ~v~..^ ;'arc, re,,s*c .s - - ,t r {L _ 4. '~a - - k,,I f g. _ 4T f - - 4 - } t S• FS SS•m, - - Y -i 4 fi T f - - 12 ~ ~ i ~ . '~~r , . , s~ _3 'F F ~F - - # 6 µ i 11 I p { x - J k: r~ 'Wr t 1 Ef , I ~ , ~ , ~ I : ' - 1 ~ . . , ~ , . r_:~ _ , , -1 ~ . 4r . a ~3 a rt~- S,rtir~~.at - rr~as..rfsa go f .xs- na s°i "~xa Syr ~.,=yy a f r 3 r -t z5- - _ - 5M z-'Y ' , & s ~~~9 S; jL ~~a~- f ..~tv w 3 - tiY.,~..-c&` k ;'0 3 ^ ~-~.=*si ' •~'~aY~ii.,~h~.'''-=~=~'~ Y LM~ ~a ~ W`~~~„z~~~'~~c~~`R'~. r4 j HAGLUND a KIRTLE7 wTSpRNCYS wT um - ` s 3` ONE UAW PLACE x '-`r• a lot SW MA:N.3tJlTG IOOO r PORTLAND. OR 972os ? yy',' aav 5•{xnxx M- a. °:'::;3't `~~.Y ° r.44' Ds ° r` - `#r*,~ xs TYUVHONt UoJl x9•am-;'q i,v- "'hhr t c.' h FAC31WLt (SMV =5.1297 k WE 't- '~'y~'`.,.,z•~„u -se - March 18, 1996 r, nt n~ . kxs g ~t ~ ztf~ r r _ Jerree Gaynor f E City of Tigard aaT' 13125 sw Hall Blvd., ,xl Tigard, OR 97223 k RE: City of Tigard Planning Commission vacancy <9 Dear Ms. Gaynor : Please find enclosed my completed Citizen Committee r ?k Y Interest Application. I would appreciate the opportunity to be 1 - included as part of the formal interview process that will be y -ZE conducted to select an appointee to fill the newly-vacant; Planning Commission position. ^r r st _ i-R~' Although not specifically mentioned in the Interest Application, my work history includes covering local planning an ccmmissions for two different daily newspapers. I am happy to a Z T, provide any additional in£ormatioa that may he needed. - F- 3 a a _ L k. # , - a Very truly yours, 4 _VV k z p Y ayx r + r k Michael G. Neff t'. w. Mit - Y'SyL - i ff _ J. L ! .Cx3R 1 N'•L `~F 'u'+ y M, Z' -M @iar! W X. NA W WE Wt 4ngvj Rip s, : ',x k x'_T F k t.r 1 OEM, 9 eta r` T-`"aay.F r. _ ih µ rn-, y 3rd .5r y~t~ 3f3 ~7~~:777777 77, t : M Fa~-aS rae~ i t f~ „t q h r - fr jyY„y -s jM- 5 i i ,r'- i _ 4 6' 5 y+ r 3y r a .ay.S s'-.r+ t~ w s az s"N:,,~a f Y~a.~ { ti k , t > - _ _ a *`,tk• .~'.2 ` ,.r.r 's x -i 6 r,"ttz w E- ~ CJ~ t - _ 1 t T- ix ,t®-. m,, Y4T 4 ffi a - c- - P ty.. f _ n r - - - - - - - - - v.s-aL-:..~. .e.- a,._. x~fi.~»u•--....c.:..1-S,4,Ktt3 .y ' ~t "I I 'a Kin is So is:at Iu cosi:7Y rn~n-n.rew5u s AIAILE t I-ad P.Jd/Jd F•sdi a .Y?• i - ` 7z" " ~ E Pns!•ir Fox Win Test 0- x-13' xi , , r ewo." Ca C. d £ - OF YY~I~Y\Yi _,,,w,:""--,,, ~ " ~ ,-",-~,r-- ORE ° , - ®x CORD UMM EST APPLICATION s Mame: /l7=~rsif~t. G. ^/EFF - - i6 - 96 3 Addroas (flea.): / 6~ ~O `✓COFOE2 C-0--ck O,ex~E Rea MOM-. S98 -79s'~ _ - -x n - Addtt?SS (BUS.): l0 / Swi+tASNIo ,RS.NP!/'fi ~GTVoND SIA. MCn8: ZZS- 0777 R _~i = .,~`,~y ~ r ` t.enC i of Residence in Ti etd: Z ~2 --r--<-,A Yl S Suggested try- r✓A c -Ir-E ~ '\t ~ a - ~ ~ I v'{ 5 mare did you fiVii pPeYiONBiy "!57.4 LF_ m ,f; - - I;j L - , - ttL t:duCSSlotS81 f3aclcgrOtutd' ~~'z/oc TOP~o S ~y ~•FieSr7Y O~ OZE6oN //09L) a s i _y 7 • T-7 i - fi^ - R-'ck Y i- A 2 R-. 1ZnGK5e_~P nP s~ -7-r ~W'rr.-.s, rrseH S[r0oeG } fF~ f/ GmGCEb /~.r BZ) G4~ rr of /9786 /NU ~ , R a • t fFrit , OeCUpBffien81 SIFICI3 and Background: iaT-r-2~eY w n i 6,. u • Hit 6cslvlJRi GEr ' s s r 1 t, l Oi 11 cc, ancaS a - /pn-Z4cG 1n c. U+/f0 S-G aid 1i=.✓sS .e. :S E ' - 1 / 6t4 LtT p17 C.~~-++S Ocrj.Oa- iO1'1 C /^~^SV Dpi •o✓Rifa i pnc Sr w " o/ ✓S n° , ( " ' - ,ice __~T f -7 i r S - e-"-- a z-a l long have you been employed with thia firm.. - / QS , i Previous Community Activity: ,$aNo ~trAL ~E2- ; x= , f ' a its ?K~ In I F v". _ - 'I K ? ~ 0 ' 9 OfQ61tIZSIIOCI3 zrtd t?(fECeS: AN-.rJNT'S r a enffr,.v-v as } ti " , I 3a S,r4' 4 .I 1 13r~ Si$if " _ 'i R o tither lnfotmatfan (General Remarks): Hlf ✓E- >a Se 2 r~vS rrrLe2St i z i✓ es2i rrv6 ,t7,-/ T7rE y to ~ /3_I.z_VC C/a~ e F:A5e A Ro,,.,,, ,0 Tt~ovor/.-FVL ? c'2'G 1~ ecard or committee IRtett3stad In: f LANN=,Y4- ,,=ssro/'/ ' u~ ! 11l a ~ Any other pertinent information you went t0 shara? 4 + -<1- e-17-&-Y .z'N VGLV r c7 rrf A ^VMPT L' 1 - , o N64:, l'- 5A(,,9! C',4 Z! 66 pc-'-t•=S or' ~-/'•-CS"rJ (,'H NO -r-0 -Ttl'~ r9~3 r' SSe'~=~ "I a •1 c3 ,-Z--e .P2...-Co Z+1A -,-01-/ /9 S JP /Y 1;,0044-<- L 13125 SW Noll Blvd- Tgcra OR 97223 (503) 639-:171 TCA (503) 63:-2772 p zC 7 1 _ fR S .m ' Z ca/la/ss !s:so :X/Q.e x0.062s D.on> f - ` g 4 - t L s t } "'y' a x _ _ s- ' zf e \ A d- ; ~ _ - - - - _ y ^ - - E, r, -_11 I&WIZe. s rte' - s h a _ - - l~ a t R1 s. a i - r, _ - -'7 - 4 ,Of -,t "mom -y - } r ,1 . r - ' m„-- T...,`......._ ~~wx.-x'fsos:.s&*:..K _.r..w,.. 7 a' R - ? M~ _ I WAN l_ , AGENDA ITEM # 3,1-1 » 11 I rr~ For Agenda of June 11, 1996 ~5 .figc.z-y Pr . -~..ti 1 OF 11VE11C1J>OREGON ,4 - n1.s , gRe r' pL COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY . r 1 asir' h il'~ ;"gym 4 a. ~ d '✓9-*'"4 ,n+ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award contract for 130th/Winterlake Bridge Construction s xr, - Tx~ sc430 c{ ~ 91, x ; PREPARED BY: Clary Alfson A DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK s V - s b rrn. i S~,t - ~ 7 "a g, w.t' r' ~y I'll ? ° y p vy k, ISSUE BEFORE THE COLiN " Award contract for construction of the bridge connecting Winterlake Drive to 130th Avenue. , V M ~ ~ 3 a - J a j STAFF RECOMMENDATION 4F t[ Award the contract to the low bidder Mowat Const. Co., and authorize the City Administrator to sign the contract. C x ~ , zz " - z . INFORMATION SUMMARY.~r The 130th / Winterlake bridge connects Winterlake Drive to 130th Avenue. The project was initially proposed for ' r ~ ~ a N construction 2 years ago. The project was delayed in order to allow the adjacent property owners a chance forr-I `~O input into whether or not the bridge should be built and, subsequently, into the design of the connection. We have 11-1 ,.c,04_ R , I .1 met with neighborhood groups and, on November 14, 1995, received Council approval to proceed with the design r T~ ~a'" r Y r and advertisement for bids. Prior to advertising the project for bids the Public was allowed to review the finals4- plans as directed in the November 14th summary sheet. f X 4, a X - .3r - n - e - 7J' R ~ -a a { t On May 28th, seven bids were received as follows: . ,rte 3 - Mowat Const. Co., Kirkland, WA $514,771 Holm II Inc., Stayton, OR $560,535 Carter & Co., Salem, OR $602,838 r~ K2 Construction, Portland, OR $618,434 i $ 11.111, e.- I r F.E. Ward Inc., Vancouver, WA $629,040 ` a4 fg~m C. A. Carey Corp., Issaquah, Wa $657,454 f Beming Const., Wilsonville, OR $761,906; T ` v s a~ "jr The Engineer's estimate was $553,500. ` z R , s ; r r OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED i{~'~ a N t ti FISCAL NOTES s , st - L v ~s ` The project is funded from the Traffic Impact Fee fund portion of the Capital Improvement Program. Funding is " r a - ° ` - allocated in the 1995/96 budget and is being carried over to the 1996/97 budget.' ' 4 - r x ((f l-.f---- f-i_ d,- rsa..;nn'e z-"..a f t[ .y' N✓ T", r 4 ,yam C.. t g a Rg F ra,r rmn» r, - ^w4r,. s F , r'rs 77-< ' axt-sir!. .S 3- T ~,y -7 f' f IVY S - f t - iZ - # ' h s~X r IN wk - r f. + t , U ~ _`~~f,~_ ~ ~~..'J,-~", ~ , - j- ~ . . ' _ - ~ J I- - , ~ _ ,'Z~' ~ 11'11,,~_,_,.,;.~.." . ~ 'y~ _ A Y}1 A i ~ ~l-a i y ~ 4 _ r _ T - 33p A s Y t,.,r -'Yw~'3r s rxY ~,~'i sr s F , ~ N MMt~',~V "~,I"L,'_, _f,,~~., - , n ~ _ ~ , _.~l _ I . W 'L . , , , , , - , . k i I , r y - s ~n~ ...T•.o-.+~., ~s i f "y r~~< tc . y _f { ~~_w i, x s~ `__a✓ e4 - , ~1 a kt pis, - F - - .~Y TkT'F' 3 {tG 'r -F - S `".ai,""`r'~, ,t t F - _ r to - k..- 1 Y """l _ -i.§YI rI"s '~i . ,n'Sa L -,z .Y la'}fL.=s -X ~ ~ '~-a ;...s,..._.. ..................s.»L - -:.ra'~.._.:... x.,.~.'..:.-.....:W...:.N "'.z.....s e 1, I r..... & 1'° y:ss Lis 'dpi . y, S<~, ,r -afvi 4 $ u 3A `'iri r€'- "^c I "e7, I 3.5 s s - AGENDA ITEM # ; 7s z - For Agenda of (n l 11- - 1- 3 tqb 1Z, h t _ r CITY OF TIGARD OREGON u, , COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY t'+-- , ',k `1' , ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Initiation of Vacation Proceedings for approximately 6-445 square feet of public ^gti+ 4 }F~ ~ ~z K R Fes; ''1,` rY a># a -r s i PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ~,J 1, j i i ~f r _ n ISSLJF BEFORE THE O N I ".rz,sP' s+-~ - x "t ,3 ~ mow, Y _ _ t3' ti Should the City Council initiate vacation proceedings involving approximately 6,445 square feet of public right-of- t ,r.` way on SW 135th Avenue. i r-~ + i 3 s STAFF RECOMMENDATION 2 A, I a It is recommended that Council initiate vacation proceedings by adopting the attached resolution. ' , N;% ' - ~ - } ; " ` _ , : - - , INFORMATION SUMMARY t ~y yKtz ~ ~ x t n _ In the City vacation process of streets, easements, and other public dedicated areas, the City Council begins the tka - $ k,4 F process by passing a resolution to schedule a public hearing to consider such requests. , ~ Z, , g, 11 f;a I, The City of Tigard Engineering Department is requesting that the City Council initiate vacation proceedings for 4r ~ sfy, k I approximately 6,445 square feet of public right-of-way on SW 135th Avenue. In conjunction with the construction t r ,~r -)of Castle Hill No.2 subdivision, SW 135th Avenue was re-aligned to provide "T intersection. The :e-alignment` t shifted the road to the west (Exhibit A). As a result, an approximately 6,445 square foot portion of the public f' - r + 3 right-of-way is no longer needed. The area to be vacated will go to the prope rty owners adjacent to the area to be e r ^a~~ f _ - vacated. _ tizc f - Appropriate agencies shall be contacted for comments, prior to developing a report for Council consideration. 3 { ~ ~ ~ %F Attachments: Exhibit A - (site plan); Exhibit B - (legal description); Exhibit C - (vicinity map); "`f :k~ ~ : OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED s $ rc t tax Take no action at this time. J , ' t k - v . J yt A „ 5" ` - E 4 ,g I is\cirywide~sum\vac135Ut.sum k7 - kx as x y - s 05/30/96 1:03:29 PM A sri f F r a _ 3-t r wr't ? 4~," -r k -.aap W i * ° T ~,!.~',---l-'r~~--,~,~,:~~,,'~~,~~',~~.'~--'~!. , [ .7 - - 71 ~ N f L -f 14K y S - } - Y' _ y r fi a* ~~~z~Z,,t~:,,~,~~~-~~.,-:,~-~~'~.-.".,-, L2 `L t !_I'' - - 1 , " lp',:, - - - '~,-,~~,11` I - 1~kt -I",:, ,"I I.;, a ~k i A1- L m 1-~f - - t ? -i .IfW 1 -7" w f WA - { ~ £'rr _ _ a i_, 1 _ - r t _,~a i t A J { ff f M -I. $L,~~;~~ --~-111' , ~ . - , ~ - I . 11; I ~ ~ ~ . I , " "I", " - a -k~~-!,!,":~,, r{ - 177 a^.wwnvr'i. c s. i. _ in Lz y _ - `r"777f'~]. =,--a ~TrR - _ _c.74 ~ 7 ~..~a_ 4iI-.- ...f~ . r-r.sw, w os'-ice Z'- , - , , - 1- ~ , 0 ts, 'k Y - _ r £s , x, V j d1'j'A~Yaf.yt~'€`' - S- r - s i r - g - -i r, ~'r - ' a . 'g'?`TTsretst;% a-i .qz ice-. ; S° i t A`" -F `i3 f z - i - -4 - s t bag 5 + - - - e ' ,R- °cs `i.r~k ~ ry '1 'g" , -*s j - - - , 4-, t »,v "~a c *`x s-a4 f, 'us P 7 € ...,~:vscan :a...,..,. .....~~Ra.,.__a......v .~a..... .w.... ..ti v..,_,;. ._.._.::u~.+.e:.3...:,_'- .,,:~a.o-t - rr - - g~."' - 4 LLs y. j y n i ti td TgA , r 4, ; ' a AGENDA ITEM # 3, LP ~ s~ RM x For Agenda of June 11.1996 ; ~ r~ : ~ ^i,' yv, 4~ rt CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ; § % "t' -z' COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY u « 3 ; ; x 'i - - ISSUE(AGENDA TITLE WCCLS Public Library Services Agreement s- , , 4::0 I I cf 4 f PREPARED BY: Kathy Davis DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK`r ` , rk.~", k , ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL a a ' , 4 -?`i~` Should Ti and continue its artici ation in the WCCLS Coo erative during the 1996-1999 funding cycle? 5 , t r .i'>~ £ha t g P P P x tmg ~'d r STAFF RECOMMENDATION r Authorize participation by signing the Public Library Services Agreement. ~ , ' ` INFORMATION SUMMARY I- s~~, it Xu1 ^y - - - - 5.*i ~111 11-11 Since 1976, Tigard has participated in a cooperative agreement with Washington County for the provision of I~ , ` -Ii -Ii r - t ri, 7 Library Service to all county residents. Funds to operate the cooperative (WCCLS) aze collected through a r t countywide tax levy. Each WCCLS member then receives a portion of those funds based on level of service - as ' t % f, il, t f indicated by annual circulation statistics. During the upcoming three-year cycle, Tigard Public Library will receive - f ' , J 5. 1 approximately $3,000,000. ~ Z , ~~f " s a : ' r OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED - '-W L s 1 , 1 1F3 None. ;g r p` ` ' FISCAL NOTES 4, f , tin is f Without membership in the WCCLS Cooperative, the direct cost to the City's General Fund for Library Services in T -l , . _ [ Y - - ' r Fiscal Year 1996-1997 would increase from $389,045 to $1,326,714. N ? ~ " ` s ` r ' z # ° 4 eI - ° I:Mitywidelsumlwccls.dec .v r,,F„'tf=r b,a i i r ;v ~ ~r :t ,~.I w 3 a 1 Y'' .,tKa t E. E - rw 7 " f ~t : . , ' t x>:4 v'- x?e , , fi - &...z 'emu s t:E,-;~ ..tom' t- h" , . - a ? I .S na 4r f # - 2 y s x v.~ ' - 4~j x sv a` s e - - t' ~ § x" - 1 3 1 'Wv, 4 -Y S 4 - Jf -3~ktS -3,' r r a z_ 7 f t t - _ 6' - 1 'C°t 6{ A { .r F tijS F lY A_''P'' 42 i r b- z^„ - s 14,- - - _ T f gg ~xi+ 3'rt y^qt x - } - 1. I ~'dt+ i''Kh''~,C T"F- r" -f - 1 I.. ry I sett} - 1 St ' -,I d U K I-_-_ ''''-Tt x 'Y - y 1'e.,E' t's_ :r~..s.._,.a ..i.u.r.r ....a „a;,....•,u''»... ..:v»;~- ..z.'.-;:;..' a,:.J tt,^,mia E"`~' a+ _ T ~L. ,-341 A _ -a' /7 '1 l "s- i 'a=rc a";~,,,,,: 1 v,L Cal- 1,~. , i _ c - ~,1 i A~-`.--n~ M I p , - - t'.~ U9, Ulf, U AGENDA ITEM # / E , ~7 fj [ f Tune 11. 1996 k x - s , For Agenda of t ` 4 r _ -11 11 Y z v ~ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON \ r COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY k~-" y- 4Y _ rx sue, ~~Pmmental Agreement~w h 4 } _ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Community Development Block-~Crant (CDBG Int rg r;,:: z rw } PREPARE D By; g.Roberts DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK c,~ s Y - ; TziT x , It- , 7_t IyyC~i1E B FORE THE CO INCIT_ , It- , It- , It-9" 9 9t - t Should the City formally adopt certain minor changes to the CDBG Intergovernmental Agreement as proposed by , - g 'zi ' ' c the CDBG Policy Advisory Board? ' s STAFF RECOMMENDATION a: n°I 11 a ' `4 Adopt the proposed changes. ,YJ s }5 f, C z „ INFORMATION SUMMARY . -Zll - \ ti : J At its 4/9/96 meeting, Council voted unanimously to support two minor changes to the CDBG agreement with £r_ ~ " , , , ' 11 t Washington County, which will expire July 1. One change would clarify that an elected official should serve as a s -1 r - z ` - jurisdiction's primary representative on the policy board. The change provides than an employee can serv e as an - ~ ,tAZ" t X T alternate and attend meetings. The other proposed change clarifies the board's role in making recommendations to YY~ 3 the County Commissioners concerning the Housing and Community Development Plan. This new, federally 2~ . required plan pulls together proposed county-wide housing and community development activities included in _ S - 11 other plans. As previously indicated, neither of the proposed changes represent substantive revisions to the 'a M r a ~ x J existing inter-governmental agreement. Both merely clarify present practices. R; , i ~ 3, - I~ ~ e r ER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED s 1 rf 'T ' 1f `a y None ~a Nattr e T z , , FISCAi.NOTES r iq, ' ,`9„ Support of the changes will allow the city to continue its partnership with the County and retain Tigazd's eligibility 3r - M _ E - to receive CDBG funds." - ~ g, ` a h t i:ki"id6sum.cd il ? - t ti 'dr\6/4196\1:30PM s ~~-ter F -.r x£ t F r 1 s y ~Sg. Y - - - u MV 'x - y 2'r s 's r ` 33, 4 VAC 4 { A C ,r i ^F -~Y-Cu 4L 4'F a y x _$r,~r, ..°'.~"sue. g1.ri »sQ11K ar.s;,;.'~%T- 'Z«t 't ~y- y&- 'cT., F = - ~ i-" j -'s r e - x-- ~r t t-_i I 4 ,w'~ u ' y - r £ c- l[' x ~ t "r' E F, _ FF - ie c 7 4 it- rk - C - r , t - € t- 3 1 a i yy - j1 { i - - ,u 1S+ fi- t i 4 7-2 , s t _ - r - r n E- 7 _ T' W Y _ v _ d Y--F y t. K , E-,.~,~, - i S v, t f jl ti - - - 1 7 _ i -1 - - y t -gZ ~M4 77 I 'W =-t Fig _.;a" is NO 5' ;C`N y,:., ~r`''c'`av°.t' -~-q w .xx r C -T i` _ ti_ -`k ,~C-: ->r".C"~~`'"j'tiy r•v ;tu'=r<""3%y. .'X - `rr.~~R-• v a'e~.S,h,~ra~_#?~fy::€; <s~~ 3, -5' -~,^,s k. a - r r s ~ - d- - _ - z s _ i^ ~r~~ i .e ?:s, '•aS. s ' 4 s ;it r _4 z „ - - - - .CsPq, '7'x`xic~• mow,. a' s ~3'€_.* s r ' } EM y r ¢x{~~} i WASHINGTON g k xx " COUNTY., OREGON ~4, 0- I'M Mm " MM- N- ~ffi JUN 0 3 1926 ` u June 996 177 k 't s3 ~ ,ra r t] - Mayor Jim Nicoli r rJ 5 ~~r t t= City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 r x Attn: Bill Monahan, City Manager. r~ zx x jr, Dear Mayor & Council Members: The last letter we sent to the City, dated May 2, 1996, gave your jurisdiction the r a 3 opportunity to consider "opting out" of the CDBG Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement. -f a y xr- 4 The notice to "opt out" for the next three year period which begins July 1, 1997 l _ - had to be made, in writing, by May 31 1996; otherwise, the existing agreement would 4 ¢a+ continue to remain in effect. We are pleased to inform you that no "opt out" E-, r notifications were received, making it possible for the consortium to continue using the - ~ Y3zg Y CDBG program to improve housing, public facilities, and services for low and moderate E x # r income residents throughout the county. , h# ' -1 Normally, there would be no further action required with regard to this matter,, r but as we indicated earlier, the amendment to the current agreement, proposed by the 7 € 6 zA Wft Policy Advisory Board (PAB) earlier this year, needs to be formally acted upon and r et- Ve 201 transmitted to HUD. Most jurisdictions reviewed and verbally acknowledged their~~ E jJ concurrence with the language changes proposed by the PAB.~ a - 12 sfi ' Office of Community Development Phone: (503) 648-8814 755 N. First Avenue, suite 770. MS 7, Hillsboro, OR 97124 tax: (503) 681.2882 e~ - ,x~ ; ,51^. 7Z 1,7 FRE ~''.4"t•. k"e`'z z- r =r * r"' ;k .~~°,e - s_ - s?ar. ,t - aY,?4-§wr*'s?N r - -ti _ - "7 * -rr" . x-,~ r n- 5, `r .r -cf~r'`•k"~S.Ps - 5 y f rs + - zf r -'a€-, r.iT ~'~~N r' .7+ dh7Y d'ei} & +='1~ F hY_ - - STY hr ~-N~fyr :m;~'~'~ Mtiz -MV , ds, R,11 d 1411, hME "p x.4'+•? C,.`fk F - b - } _ -K,~4 .3` ws-r'»r 3'` ) r~e~t~_, .,,.°t.^i,''~' y„x^rby s j ) m~ = r t ( - ` t - t - a - - s `~"Tf - L,.s- = f -t 4 I - r1 ay as ~~u F dt- ZIUit, A" j: laus''ll: -4 V, ' N " t s`' .`-'~~'4 s"` - Y4 .e3 s~4r 'fit a s - - \ sza~ , q ~xr t#x U c z x3 = Page 2 (ICA) To facilitate placing the amendment before the Board of County Commissioners tr F ¢ ~ ' FF and having the documentation reach HUD by their suspense date, it's critically 01 f Y ~a important that your council adopt the attached change and have then record of approval, such as a Minuie Order or Resc.u..v^ _ 0r d _ --N reach this office by the close of business on June 24, 1996. - r` k The text of the M/O or RIO might, by way of example, simply state, "The City :~.,rrnr r a , approved amending, in its entirety, page six(6) of seven(7) of the Intergovernmental_.; Agreement, Washington County Community Development Block Grant Program Yearsb a~ v { 3x 1994-1997. The amended page, dated June 1, 1996, copy attached hereto, shall replace -tr } and supersede the former page six(6). 242 - Again, Thank You for choosing to remain with the CDBG Consortium. We look x" forward to working with the City over the next three (3) years. Lg.. _ Sincerely, M.~ ; f -`A 91 r 0 x7 _ s sir., :4 5 - 3 'zrs•,t,, x`.~ H.J. (Hank) ch, Program Manager *1. a t Office of Community Developments { _ Atch. a r cc: G. McDowell w < { Ken Scheckla/Duane Robertsx ¢ rt.: rp 5` y~ 51 'ZA .t't,5 N S:.M1-'°~ -'fir B~~s~A °~'x L• 7 Mr t ~ YS sgtr' r~,,'g i sf s r~K s b- j:icaamd r s a f F F-'st,h 3 v rAsbq„ 27 41 s s i 4 r fi: ''M -t5E N't r, t r i~,,tis °z mss-}Y { T 3 f S'~- f'. - ' •4f - - 4 - - _ ti'r ( - - J .r. - - - - - ++1' 1 L Jh ? S' - - i S S CY4` 2• L - i - O It, t P'3...t+' t 4+ - - t- _ - - diA F ~2'a' k - - - - _ - _ 2 4- axe#~., _ - o ...<:.mi,.,,,..:... - _....,~..,_.»_.._a..~ .«.Y .«.,»5s,a...)r•''~.k,...``"..«.,•':" f ' -7_ s x _ f c Y S 'R - 2 L• x' t j., i y VII. POLICY BOARD ! 'Y Y / f? G or the purposes of developing an annual Community Development Plan and Programs F as required by Title I of the Act, a policy board is hereby continued which shall guide they ` } yy plan and program development, make recommendations to the County upon the criteria Z , * to be utilized in selecting eligible Housing and Community Development Act activities - i within Washington County, and recommend to the County the'program priorities. t y t~"- s I. The Policy Board shall be composed of one representative and a desi y"atcd ~ ~7- t alternate from the County and each participating unit of general local F/~ government. The County and City shall have one vote on the board. Pity ` 4 . _x ' T • _ " ~ 4 t r. eveeFataent: Jurisdictions ehall appoint an 1 ted offs i ' as a primary. _ f . I z s~ r k oL an emotov? or oth ._r nu. lic offs ial' t h as an alternat- = s, nk v 2. The Policy Board shall adopt bylaws, study, review, hold public hearings, . supervise the public review and information process, and recommend to F' k~ z V-'- Washington County on all matters related to the Housing and Community Development Actappiisatiea , I. A tea' as amended, Activitie shall include making r ,F recommendations concemina the HR(^n, Ian and annual acra.,., .,r ~ii three f31 v~ar non-housrng GD Plan: oerformanQe m p2 (s)a •n - - r ~tv data or information on which to - .g recommendation ~.e Fth r a s £ ui. h 3. After public hearings, the Policy Board shall make final recommendation on o r' -g ,A NP . I'll -W the Housing and Community Development plan which may be accepted by a ~ Washington County at public meeting and submitted to the Department of - ' " r: --p Housing and Urban Development as the Washington County application; V. 1 4 ' ' , t i provided that, should all or part of the recommended plan not be considered i' ' - % F At a'1 , acceptable to the County, the Board of County Commissioners shall hold at t - least one (1) public hearing on the plan and program prior to rejection or 3 -k amendment of the recommended plan. The County shall be responsible for , P } " - at~ally filing €~aa! Statemeats z quiLe-d documents wit. HUD. S a r - 1 4. Projects may be implemented and funds expended in accordance with ~ ' z k subgrant agreements between the County and other jurisdictions signatory t to this Agreement. r I/1/ k x w INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT 1tR4/95 ( s_wr - x' _ f k . v F r ''7 f i' r i,Y 4 a5x 1 - Li, L 4 f o- ,X' s ~c_ - i - - i~.FF 12 61 , - i M~"~.'~ , ~ ~ , , r _ _ F _ . 11 - - „c- " P - _r- a t - - - - t - c a k , ,i. s cx^ ~t - - . s , ' 7 1 -F F s v a z' k Y'" x - 2... r5'Et 3. t,$~1~ SaFx -1 F-,_ ~-'~ta~z jq ~r~4_- N" r z ,-25 r- ; : "s.~:.'{." ::dam=7Fa' ::bN1:.' i..:.:..,~ ..w :.c,~.,.:v..,. ^ - 3,'?a,+~','." - 5t x,~ s+ vk } E t, - F AGENDA ITEM # L1 ; s * ~ t Y _ r ; For Agenda of June 11, 1996 ~ , CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ` : i- L, 14 P - , c COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY r s~ v fi ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE State Revenue Sharing and State Shared Revenues z rt P DEPT HEAD OK ' sMml~-~* t=a ,fi PREPARED BY: Wayne Lowry CITY ADMIN 0 K1►q` r g s,~ ; _4- 1 ~ 1t °S] .FF n~ ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL 4 t r ' fi +n receive stage revenues and shall the Ti aid t 3 Shall the City Council approve an Ordinance declaring t;.a ; e - - - g» - jY a - City Council approve a resolution certifying that it provides certain services making it eligible to receive state shared ~ y K E revenues' }ti . 3L m . - w STAFF RECOMMENDATION , ~ . ' - r r ~ u K I - Staff recommends the approval of the attached ordinance and resolution .L ; ~ n ' 11 r k ,n INFORMATION SUMMARY c, .y s State Revenue Sharing t x{ °,y K The City has estimated the receipt of $200,000 of state revenue sharing in the 1996/97 budget. Such funds are t Y1 available from the state for those cities that meet the requirements. The requirements include a public hearing before , g -z ~a h xf Qthe budget cotumrittee and a public hearing before the City CouncilThe hearing before the budget committee was held ,r" a F April 18, 1996. Approval of the attached ordinance will tree[ the states requirertrent for the City's election to receive , - - these revenues. -J y `l- s x r~ P . u'V_11-', - State Shared Revenues : - , - , ! _f The City has estimated the receipt of the following state shared revenues in 1996/97: 7 i - - t Cigarette Tax $ 92,400 I 11. * n Liquor Tax $ 244.650 1 R - t c ' State Gas Tax $1,595,000 Vq~ , _ , r The state requires the City to certify its eligibility to receive these revenues by stating that it provides more than four of 1~, I _ ' " " the services listed in ORS 221.760. The City does provide a sufficient number of required services and is therefore ~ -I r ;s`3 eligible for such revenues. Approval of the attached resolution will meet the state requirement of certification . , ~ ; ' - ~ p y >tz Y x QIHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED " j t Remove these revenues from the budget. ,L µ t,` . ~ FISCAL NOTES Xz,, Approval of the ordinance and resolution secures $537,050 of revenue in the general fund and $1,595,000 in the state a f - 'ixa,L a gds tax fund e X Ts +ym -`J 4 l - 1 ~ aF`G. PJ~ t ` -fir 3~ t - m, -1 "I fi 's'~ - .,i 1 { 'i F - x Et s, r r n ; -s>y -s' _ „R,-~'--- ;,,R.- ,-s?.r.r -7;',:,-.'f ,r'.5"., µ.a _ :5✓"=.~''. t, ::ice ` . t - 4 tt ? ,t - - - _ _ k r Sic 'sr~ LE , ""~11~', `11___~`. -`1__.:1`_111_1'- , _ - , ~ I ~~,',,i,,-~ ~ ~l";:,~',!,,'~~-S~.~;~i,-,:,~~,, 'k~ " , s t Y J"'t 11M a N'- d - YF 4T' 'F 1 G' . _ i' L L - I _ . ~ ' ~ ' i~~ ' ' ~ , - ;~d' i~- - R~1~1 :1 v T 4 . '"_-m--r'-_--~~..~- ^.r ^~.r-Nir'*Rr--.....-..~a•_. eA..- er+n+w.mnf... 7 A i. ' _ r... , ] 5~~;d1 ".tom. UL _ s K I o ' - eX ,t 'v k - - f-s r3,cz 4 f 1~ n - z F F 4*,. Y _ 5 -Y $ r'- . was m ....,..-...xa,-u,.. r~..«.-9..-sZ,~. v.,,-r a~ x w d- & P ' L i,fi k s' %-e4- 4 I ♦ A ~ 1 s,}r`ra - 6" J~ - kt Y i N ' AGENDA Tl EM # - a - For Agenda of June 11,1996° ;u its " CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Z , ? , ,11 i COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY - , 17- ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE 1996/97 Budget Adoption ' t 1 / X L _ PREPARED BY: Wayne DEPT HEAD OK ADMIN OK_ In ~i'_ -3 ; ` E s # -y S - f I 4W ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL r T e 1 f 1~`~ zt - Y Local budget law requires that a budget for the ensuing fiscal year be adopted prior to July 1 by the governing body, ` 33' 1 r." r• e.._....t,....has wee..n held wf:.n the l5rr f`n..nril kLL r '.S r 3 r`r k _ after app,)oval by the budget committee and after a public M,.L,a ~ s _ I STAFF RECOMMENDATION , t f V ii -11 - Staffrecondapproval of the Resolution per Budget Committee recommendation as amended by the City s Council u; i ` INFORMATION SUMMARY The City of Tigard budget committee reviewed the 1996197 proposed budget as submitted by the Budget Officer. - ; f The Budget Committee completed their review on May 9, 1996 with approval of the budget proposal as amended by , Y the committee in the total amount of $41,513,108. The committee's changes to the proposed budget are reflected in , ,N " x - = st i L Q Exhibit "A" of the attached resolution option 1. 4, , 3~- N Local budget law gives the governing body the authority to make certain changes to the budget committee 1,- t,,a'y recormendation or to adoption of the bud et. The Council ma adust budget resources up down and may Pn g y J P Y f$ increase or decrease expenditures. Increases in expenditures are limited to 10% of the published total in each fund } ~ , - 11 Three adjustments to the approved budget are being proposed for City Council Approval. The first is an increase in j ~ } ~ - F l capital projects appropriation in the state gas tax fund We have adjusted the estimate of beginning fund balance in this"~ I fund given our anticipated expenditures on projects through the end of June. This adjustment results in an increase in projects of $220,670. " A , ~ ~ ¢ x~' The second adjustment is intended to establish an appropriation in the general fund for improvements to the feed store i`- r' q property. The 1995/96 budget included funds for both purchase and improvement, however because the process has _ been delayed, the improvement portion of the funds will not be spent and should be carried over into next year. This ; A r r s adjustment will increase the general fund beginning balance and the appropriation for improvements to this property by s r ' x $55,000. $ r , / , , u i x"- s g The final adjustment is intended to adjust the appropriation for the visioning process. The approved budget included; the full program at $83,480. Based on Council discussion in May 1996, the visioning program has been streamlined ~ F reducing the total cost for 1996/97 to $55,900. This adjustment reduces the appropriation for the visioning effort by m ~ M $27,580 in the general fund ~ r r, y ak- p-, , T 1'°Ym-^- °3mz T°"`y Fes'. a k~W i E s, 3 _ V,~ rc - L 7 A} Y r r - - - r} E ~'aa - e c E k y - - R' [r[ r [ E ~ f ~"a£ a ka - P i _ y - _ sr ! F t~ s ! y { - S d y S E4 { 1 J { - i - S -i _ ' - - - fi~ 4 t- _ EI 3 3 - - _ 7 "irk ggn, tz Sg z- R t -,y -}3 t rrx i~ £ z'P'34''" xv v9 ~z ~ axati?! F1 9;3+.`,~ ~i^;AS',i3'n roz - k } -3 ti,• - t-. - p 3'?~` a. ~,t3s,~~cz ~~-a ~ A - t _ _ _ s'- ~'~t ax ~~7"~`~~c~, ~c~•-~: _V' a ~ c V NIGM OAK E4 aAVIN, Wis . ,mow„ - - ~ a ° st Y~ ` y am s gig 15 ti The budget committee recommended budget with the addition of the above adjustments is reflected in resolutions 5 ~V M option 2. t S W-M - OTHER ALTERNATIVES CON IDERED If the Council wishes to adopt the budget as recommended by the budget committee with no changes, resolutions M „ u v' option 1 should be approved. If the Council wishes to adopt the budget as recommended by the budget committees r with the addition of the three adjustments being suggested, resolution option 2 should be approved. s.~ FISCAL NOTES 3ar Option 1 provides appropriations of $41,513,108, Option 2 Provides appropriations of $41,761,198. x t t 3 k - t o Both options levy taxes in the amount of $7,917,840. A- R" IZ 1 t`+• E ~'~^3.'S-L ` hiy~d~do¢ } ~ `t~2^' ~ ; Y! ~ 9 Y S 4 f~{7 6af~~~33U A Y ~ `d` gs ku. 15- tia < v -r U r ~7 Ur 2: tz Nl~ 4 3 4 3 `y~ ~ k F F N 'N' wp3~s a}-,~' 5".'. x+ i aH e> 2 is "0 R 4, f~'~ t 31Y,{cas - E S - 1 _ - - f 't - ~'rr'~? f 50'.vy l _ -AW r - ..4 , - . _ _ - - 11'v.~P.~1i``•,'f' fxy -S ,At t~ / vsu..•,:. ..ya•~:-fal 3 j"'L{~`~" , ti - xz'y . is _ _ ~ ~1 s z* . s -s a € . - - *zcs 3 ~`.,,k}•,,, m"i,~. 4+~ •a<r s.3 tw a " - , t v -wrt` a x rj .s ` aa.3w...v :•,..-ri;~.wa:7 i.~,.» ~3.G+..k.».,1t µr;,.S'r~'¢ C r -1 I W CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON _ y f„ 2 "}''~5~~~ . , { ti RESOLUTION NO. 96- > :L n'1-,A ~ 11 - ~,A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD APPROVING THE BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS,. ,ems ~ - - I - DECLARING THE AD VALOREM TAX LEVY AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS PROVIDED BY ORS a ,r ~-xx --1P 310.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97. ,~~-s'f , 11 f-s.. x`,•:.~ - _ 'tea f..`.'~N` c r WHEREAS, the budget for the City of Tigard for the year beginning July 1, 1996 was duly s rf - approved and recommended to the City Council by the regularly constituted budget s_ F~ c committee at it's meeting on May 9, 1996, after proceedings in accordance with Chapter a I , r_ 294, Oregon Revised Statutes; and k I; a k - rz"~- n~ 4" WHEREAS, a summary of the budget document as required by Chapter 294.416 was duly F 1i "t, +4 - published in the Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City in 1 y J; ' 'F - . accordance with Chapter 294.921; and , - _ ..r Y4 '-=r-N~A'ti4" "t -'k. - rima, 'y Y:Y_ °'i= WHEREAS, a hearing by the Tigard City Council on the budget document, as approved by - r -<r ` , s„ z ; _ the budget committee, was duly called and held on June 11, 1996, whereat all interested - ~-r r "If --t ? - persons were afforded an opportunity to appear and be heard with respect to the budget. Ir -,....EL,wa r NOW, THEREFORE: AE IT RESOLVED by the Tiaa rd Cit_y Council that: ,....3 section 1- The Council adopts the budget for 1996/97 in the total sum of $ 41,513,108r, r~ 1,. ' l x. t T `mac' 'r ^ ' x t ' `e,~ f~r•.' ¢P ti on The Council adopts and hereby incorporates by reference in this resolution x the following: s-rz.t,'~" ar'~ • 1994-96 Agreement between the City of Tigard and Tigard Police Officers Association# ~"V. t dated July 1, 1994 which is currently in negotiation. T > x s~ ~t x c y $ • 1995-98 Agreement between the City of Tigard and Tigard Municipal Employee's R~ W ,'ry 5 r y - Association (OPEU) dated May 22, 1996. i -g~'x,.A'r"✓' • 1996/97 Salary/Job Classification pay plan for non represented employees as set ~ -r w U forth in the 1996/97 budget appendix including a 3.0 percent cost of living • - _ adjustment effective July 1, 1996 (3.0 percent last year), (t` ! - Rection 3: The appropriations for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1996 are approved , € ,.~.,a _ t ' - 'N - as shown in the attached Exhibit A. . The City of Ti and , - Section 4: g City Council hereby levies the taxes provided for in the °I- I - e ,!i - budget in the amount of $ 7,917,840 and that these taxes are hereby levied upon all = r I #t taxable property within the district as of July 1, 1996. The following allocation and r `1 categorization subject to the limits of section llb, Article XI of the Oregon ta M, a,_ Constitution constitute the above aggregate levy: Rl-iA - ''r '3 ~ ¢ Sub ect to General Excluded from . k f~ [,avPrPm n .imi a.ion h Limitation .11 ~~~pw ? ! . General Tax Base $ 6,499,186 Yd a ~i- _ - I G/0 Debt Service S 1.416. 654 i ',Yr`' 0 Category total $ 6,499,186 $ 1,418,654 n a x ,--,A- 2K - T- . - . . ,Q,-~-;- "i~! ` ti s a rp 4 r Total Levy $7,917,840 Li T' 1, 4 '''n-}zN ,ai c PASSED: This day of , 1996. ,Fa 4t, 'r+x x~ ( _j z5 GG Mayor -City of Tigard 4i. ~r~ { Y k r!''~' - k ATTEST: z ass `(t a a - 11 1 'C'j E~ i srr mkt r-~ a y L_ i 77 4' - s * _ City Recorder -City of Tigard ' , ,"syf~ ~ y a - ti S 7- t RESOLUTION NO. 96- ~%.s ~ , ~ q 4 { Page 1 :w ~s t JT W, S - ~S sr~.-^-.ti :c----^'-'''~-~-- ,e"'- - •:f=•s' i. .T., ,..,t, - _'~'+,.~°"r,~s'":5*.'?:° - ^4 4 yc , suf. " ^T.;_ - y.1.^'. fs2 :T-2*„ i`~" i. i.'dt:f , xwFzke•=~`i"l';,W~., y_r:1..:~,." .J - r ° X 'Y 3 yk - yZt H'+ t t r a , 4 r } ,r" Y ~_:Z4 ; t X Y 4 , k rd• b 4~ 1" eYf 12 1`1~-,_~,~ _1`W_1`1-_-____`1 , " ~ ~ , i , , s nfi r . 5 t~ , , , - i _ , ~L~ ~ , , : ` " ~ 4_., ~ _ , '~o Z,:T.-- ~ ~ I ~V t{ L". N S ; . Yq- y } --bra t ! - i 3- oaf 3 t, f t i t' 3 X•~ R ~ - -tom k J-r r- - i - i F x- - - t: r i pt • r - _ _ _ tea,- v.-... .v t.~ _.r _..a,.<_:__._ 1 ~_~c_ -_.__~1~... ~ _..4 ~..Y .,.vi_ .c zil x t amt i` _ , 'e,~'] M 1~ . t~t' K t F F,k "R'-a-` " 4*S'~ 1 r - Lt fi 1-S x, - _r'°1 - x ® P e F f - - ty ~x i k4 mow.-'Szr#,. i y"'§t-m» ` - ~ 4 ~F - - n - y k = x.. ,r`d~~,e.r ,fir 'ice 11 I k - _ _ -rte F4`; "-+t ~,r- -1 ` ' ~ . -M - 3 i r - - - - - - - - - - , y ms's ' - ^r ' ,..~..3.~.s "&:1:r-_1? 'g'S'++,i,.,. '~.'e- '44 s ? Ti .s.~U~' , " `iz -ya A. t.. p - 2 rµ'1 #k ^~r' F , - ';vt3_^'=1 t _ d - `fir - ME F , r` ~ -q x City of Tigard, Oregon t x w z r. ; t' s s ' Resolution No. 96- c , „Exhibit A" "p r s, x - y✓s s ue.- r Option 1 Budget rte; fia a Committee Council < Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted ; _ General Fund " .Tg x r Community Services 6,969,158 2,500 6,966,658 6,966,658 ~ f ~ Public Works 274,778 274,778 274,778 "lid r V` r Development Services 1,480,608 1,480,608 1,480,608 ~ 0s - + " f ' Policy and Administration 1,632,056 28,056 1,604,000 1,604,000 , Non Departmental 259,032 -3,675 255,357 255,357 =xX a b Debt Service 0 0 0 &h j = ~ Capital Projects 187,500 147,000 334,500 334,500 ' 1 5 nMLSt <a - Contingency 300,000 300,000 300.000 rj Al F Total Fu d 11,103,132 112,769 11,215,901 0 11,215,901 - ' Building Fund ` 3 _ 'n"-'_ A r ~'N - 11 ` Community Services 0 ;~I ' Public Works 11,452 11,452 11,452~~ + a x ` _ P Development Services 701,261 701,261 701,261 $ ~gr~~14zmn .4" Policy and Administration 91,664 -3,207 88,457 88,457 p, - ~t X Non Departmental 29,604 420 29,184 29,184 } k Debt Service 0 0 ~ ~ x a Capital Projects 0 0 1 -I - ` e t a . ~x _ -l, Contingency 50,000 50,000 50,000 ? ~ 5 Total Fund 883,981 -3,627 880,354 0 880,354 „ - - i t .1 4 Electrical Inspection Fund III 11 Community Services 0 0 a 4 Public Works 659 659 659 . , , r ° x- i~, Development Services 185,920 185,920 185,920 } - - Policy and Administration 21,708 -802 20,906 20,906 W Non Departmental 7,401 105 7,296 7,296"'. f Debt Service 0 0 _ ° - - Capital Projects 0 0 cb-i~yt t t r. Contingency 20,000 20,000 20,000 Total Fund 235,688 907 234,781 0 234,781 -r ` sa Sanitary Sewer Fund x3~ Q Q ~ - I- 11 Community Services " i Public Works 504,030 504,030 504,030 a ~ s~~ k -11 - r - _ Development Services 65,069 65,069 65,069 ' -s3 r E 7 Policy and Administration 238,926 -5,344 233,582 233,582 , !P { - r i Non Departmental 49,340 700 48,640 48,640 t,g ` 13, r Debt Service 0 0 I. -x,` t; Capital Projects 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 c ` - -"a ~ . =q _ Contingency 200,000 200,000 200,000 r + ' 5r r } ~ r Z_ Total Fund 2,557,365 -6,044 2,551,321 0 2,551,321 s r ` x r - - - k.,'~ ? 'ix x std Resolution 96 _ ps a _ t err ~r t "Exhibit A" 3 w ",F i # Page 1 of 6 ~ 6 ✓ t~-t, --'ro' ~.°t i* I ;tom ~L' E.:= m~ t.,K - ~'c` m j _f ,se.~.. - t 5 - ,r^, _ - -s` r "q; £'•."6..<.tc 'xa~!•t- t y 7* y~ e' _ t _ _ € a' _ - - _ _ - - 1 Yf YyJ _ 1 - - - £ t' ' L bt $ } * 7 U .r. `_",t'5~'~1,11',:::,-'1 __1111",": , , , _ , _ , 1. _L__ - " - ~ I ~ -t J f - rY T~, 7-' f, - k} d '"sly , `y. - t3 Y _ a-- F fi- k VaM" dW r' % Y td IL ~i f t _ , , - , ~ -5 -0, ~ ~ . - ~ _ , , r s" 'e..t x - P R-~- _ 7a -t Fq 4^l F S ,r J, Zn i- L z r _-r'_ y5 c M~~i - J ) L t_, 9 i . F L 4 k l~ r-T-^-+t+---n1^"^I"^"'~.gC-F^t^i^..^wn•^~t't~+R. Cr'".~-` "•~S' ~'~'-w-t-a i..+.-'.+s~.I °--.~`sT' 'Z-'~-Tf!1'.-,~•"I•'3 L r u 7 r4, " tip' O k7ga, ~ 42%Murw Mum, alk a` R ~ sz#r}t ip a, U } - - n Y. y,"p ~-kW' 'k,. yx l.' iM, F r City of Tigard, Oregon Resolution No. 96 _ ..Exhibit A" } a r3r~ Option 1 Budget F }3~z 2- 'v ~ 't Committee Council - _ ; Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted, s x Storm Sewer Fund C _M_10. ggl Community Services 0 0,~ Public Works 504,092 504,092 504,092 y b Development Services 65,069 65,069 65,069.2 5- r Policy and Administration 217,921 -4,275 213,646 213,646 t4 *s~r } Non Departmental 49,340 -700 48,640 48,640 gz Debt Service 0 0 F9~~+$"'~ . ~ Capital Projects 800,000 1,027,000 1,827,000 1,827,000 x r a' ~ k'Y Contingency 75,000 75,000 75,000 4- rn } - Total Fund 1,711,422 1,022,025 2,733,447 0 2,733,447 s w¢ ; Water Fund y~ r; Community Services 0 0 i i *TM i n { -f Public Works 3,759,031 -341,860 3,417,171 3,417,171 Development Services 0 0~ t r r Policy and Administration 296,191 -6,413 289,778 289,778 Non Departmental 49,339 -700 48,639 48,639 g 3° M, s Debt Service 0 0 t m F b Capital Projects 740,100 740,100 740,100 14 Contingency 300,000 300,000 300,000 ~X p, - Total Fund 5,144,661 -348,973 4,795,688 0 4,795,688 a3 a y Criminal Forfeiture Fund IN Z-P~ft Community Services 5,000 5,000 5,000 ry , gg' Public Works 0 0rF - m Development Services 0 0 x a~ a Policy and Administration 0 0 f a Debt Service 0 0~ rr x Capital Projects 0 0 k Contingency 0 0 Total Fund 5,000 0 5,000 0 5,000 ` y rx State Gas Tax LM"~ F r v Community Services 0 0 ' Public Works 490,770 490,770 490,770 { r Development Services 480,239 480,239 480,239 e w rV~ f ,fir , r Policy and Administration 150,685 -4,275 146,410 146,410 NIS! g r Non Departmental 39,472 -560 38,912 38,912- u ' u , Debt Service 0 0 Capital Projects 955,000 -347,000 608,000 608,000 { T Contingency 50,000 50,000 50,000 s t F Total Fund 2,166,166 -351,835 1,814,331 0 1,814.331 w > d-Aa ry al - ~ ~ z % ~tu~.a Y Y t Resolution 96 "Exhibit A" Page2of6~ i r f 's 4 .t rx r M ,,,a~Lcu v7 z,1 tk' { E - 5- y F 9 z i afr i-s .t ~ ( a r9r sky- s v i - c 3, 'h 3 a r a~ ttf 'a`rs„„3=:4~..: r r 3 - 1T-f S+e.I 7S d`. awax > 7.,5'<g ,~*`'s -Ya~•" ta' ~a"'`,ks-4 a - m - •,r a5- ~"*d-.~a'^,~;= a," ,{4Yr y ' L ? } g. Met fflIN, ' City of Tigard, Oregon r fi { z i Resolution No. 96- R v ao "Exhibit A" x { ' Option 1 Budget# `;ta N 5 Committee Council A Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted az County Gas Tax Fund- a~s Community Services 0 0 <I'r3 >{x; , _ _ Public Works 107,979 107,979 107,979 =<y_: Development Services 0 cy ministration 41 -5,069 40,797 40,7 ~ Ems'"'''~_ ~ Poli and Ad 866 97 _ Nan i - De erimental 9,868 140 9.728 3~ m = Debt Service 0 0 Xx' rp~„ fa t Capital Projects 0 0 ?Ea d ems,,r s Y - _ fir: Contingency 0 0 .gKS# -',40- y u, f Total Fund 159,713 -1,209 158,504 0 158,504 Traffic c sr Impact Fee Fund sr r ` Community Services 0 0 € Public Works 0 0 Development Services 63,586 63,586 63,586 s~ 3 Policy and Administration 0 0 f ~ t t A Non Departmental 0 0 Debt Service 0 0 ~1r rp Capital Projects 2,980,000 -680,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 s s Y y Contingency 150,000 150,000 150,000 $ ,t _ Total Fund 3,193,586 -680,000 2,513,586 0 2,513,586 ~i a.. 4 ` 7 Parks SOC Fund s - Community Services 0 0 } w Public Works 0 0~ f' Development Services 0 0 fi Policy and Administration 0 0 F # Debt Service 0 0 t f - Capital Projects 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 x451 ~A ^ t {sd r Contingency 75,000 75,000 75,000 l x z' Total Fund 1,175,000 0 1,175,000 0 1,175,000 4 F 4, r€ 4 4 Water Quality/Quantity Fund Community Services 0 0 14 Public Works 0 0 r r , Development Services 0 0 3 Tai , Policy and Administration 0 0 a r r, Debt Service 0 0 } { * Capital Projects 430,150 430,150 430,150 x f m,s Contingency 0 0 1r~ts - ° - - Total Fund 430,150 0 430,150 0 430,150 x r~ k w o r o, t i Resolution 96-~ u 7 -NN 'Exhibit A•r.x Page 3 of 6 z € t # 7 i P f . v W _ A 'r -r'°''"` ;r.c.' s 4'. ,4` .,a,` - 'r - 1„ ~'r:5i.,`;++~^, "T; e,...`-a` °.M3` "3'~, nv,. _r.x.F+.x +a M' t ' tns t{ ~h~ a 1 Pt, +Xs z _ ' G J r ~ rs -•-t -Y,ter..-..o^.-..~...-,....S-r.-.. t~.... '__°'_'-3t"""°•--•-r..,.a^..,----x.=_7_1_ =r.•.;fa_n.E--~- rte- •1 -..x r~T ri`ka ~ £s,+a t r ^sa r ~ tiv.. 3 x a-'rc € t '4.ff St ah-FU~u -st;v,3 fix' s-s..- xF.1, £ --d F atc'.c'S '$+ksa 7 el R.,~ix,~- ~ § 'T 2y x - R ; c a - - a¢ ,?i C .a ~q ,.y,+,~as'~4,` .r 0 50 , y,y ~N O Z4M 02 14 Mzt-g"u- rr it its M e, wom N, 10 City of Tigard, Oregon Resolution No. 96• ~ W -i%' q` r- .1 4°w $ "Exhibit A" r PUM -.M ; Option 1 Budget tr4 w Ro" _ >t } r _ Committee Council + ? £ } q a Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted fi3 ® J5 r + Water SDC Fund Community $eNICOS Q Q -`s:~:=%' - Public Works 0 0 ~-3 . a=._ . Development Services 0 0 M=an r' 54 Policy and Administration 0 0 N. t Debt Service 0 0'~ !m- W5, P110 PON 2- IRS i Capital Projects 2,750,500 2,750,500 2,750,5002 N + at 3 ' _ Contingency 100,000 100,000 100,000 k ' +r ~x Total Fund 2,850,500 0 2,850,500 0 2,850,500 dryR~ S f a g a G/O Bond Debt Fund -ANR _ Community Services 0 0~ 1 fry t Public Works 0 0i Development Services 0 0 z ` Policy and Administration 0 0 x~st ? , °s V Debt Service 1,596,095 1,596,095 1,596,095 { Capital Projects 0 0 a yr s - s , Contingency 0 0 r-- Total Fund 1,596,095 0 1,596,095 0 11596,095 r~ w Bancroft Bond Debt Fund _ WN NWW Community Services 0 0 u r' Public Works 0 0 _ Development Services 0 0 k " - Policy and Administration 0 0 Debt Service 4,703,000 4,703,000 4,703,000 * - ' - ~ Capital Projects 0 0 ~t Contingency 0 0 ~ Total Fund 4,703,000 0 4,703,000 0 4,703,000 , Metro Greenspaces Fund -ice Y Community Services 0 0 F Public Works 0 0IXt 'N ' Development Services 0 0~~} b r z Policy and Administration 0 0 ~r f Debt Service 0 0f rtis q ` ° Capital Projects 633,000 633,000 633,000 F 2 Contingency 0 0 +s y N Total Fund 633,000 0 633,000 0 633,000}5~. _,1-25 ffl"i _V5,4 „ - Resolution 96- t rhw y r - "Exhibit A" k ° s rs b { t r, Page 4of 6 „L2w,- a5.sv _ r...a:.-°-x.vxe-=~:.xk-3ir;"".M1'.+.Y, .~.,.;,,;;t.3_,r p F.r^R•,~°~'crrr,E•,.-+ur;~ ur>;<". ~r.ts tom., a r r ^~'s"d€i`~',4 rS7+`'q¢,ri!~' t`4-' ~2s'~'-` n cm R 7 x2 a{{c , x..ra kx 20, ..z"2-, Rdl t k `f F -r t r zr ~ a E r~ r a }f a 4 'T t~2,{x +a,_' 4 t -r Ty ,t 4 #,n"4e-.3„ 4 3 q~"rE r" 3' n~"~ b6 f a*p .cr - t w - - `2 f r r - €..3'a`-??}DE tgr 7 7, ~.~r-....-_.. .Y ~r^-ry.,.Y. le"-~.~i- ':-,.^--~..^^^.•'e-+.- r ~r~----z r W .s ~ - - - - - _ _ , - . rs a~-- f }'4, w e i x fi'g'"- i i "°.5 , h i , -x~ c +a=s. y It 77-1111 -a. y`e"x € y..'. et wm- c { c - S 2 _ _ f t - k. 3 r.y , e a 7 iy`'Y} s fir t Y * 3v } r~ ~ w` 'v°s.. rAw~¢{4~:,,'."'"k _Ft,- r _ 3f"`..`e__:,::ss3"rz=:,:.'>"s. s.-rha s. zri''-€`.-v f "*.',,,X` - 4 _ F .,'dt - -tl 3 r. 5 - Y'ka "3. T-s r~v,9 ` V2 4z 1, `sz i ~,F-'~ -.a ci, ~a 33' ;vT~'r„~..-'h as` ' City of Tigard, Oregon i i f 4 K gas Y'~ Or; d 3 y Resolution No. 96- , ' 1 a .c "Exhibit A,. s- a~ 4 s Option 1 Budget I,s~ awti - Committee Council r ~ - . - 3 ; Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted hq , ~ a ~ Facility Fund r:;,` ~ s? - 1t:.1,. iL r-# (:OmmUnih, cerv ices g U z` T"mss' - - j Public Works 0 0 f f,F'~~ z Development Services 0 0 * t Policy and Administration 0 0 ° .s,..s - r * Debt Service 0 0 a.- , ...`r~+." d a ' r Capital Projects 314,700 35,000 349,700 349,700 ~ ' -w 0 , y w 4a a_ Contingency 0 0 j # x Y { ~ r Total Fund 314,700 35,000 349,700 0 349,700 L v. ~ ~ " 11 Fema Disaster Fund - , x , t -rte Community Services 0 0 £ i : r Public Works 170,250 170,250 170,250 . ~ s - r b~-, ~v^. 4 - Development Services 0 0 y~ ~;£6 k a POIICy and Administration 0 0 _,x ~ ^ - t ~ t '3 Debt Service 0 0 a% - { Q - ~ Capital Projects 0 0 x ~ ~ WLgrg"zi r Y' Contingency 0 0 Total Fund 0 170,250 170,250 0 170,250 rerl ze _ t ~f `{W` Sh _ Q e " c LID CIPFund ".r y w Community Services 0 0 r < i Public Works 0 0 ~ Development Services 0 0 , , - ea Policy and Administration 0 0 1 * Debt Service 0 r 0 g I'll " 'w t _ Capital Projects 1,680,000 1,680,000 1,680,000. ~t ~ Contingency 0 0 ~ } - x r t 5 Total Fund 11680,000 0 1,680,000 0 1,680,000 - I it, ~ 11 , _3t Underground Utility Fund ? r s ; Community Services 0 0 Public Works 0 0 g t Development Services 0 0 4k~m ~ - , x Policy and Administration 0 0 k ~ z", a- Debt Service 0 0 z f j i, , ° ' ' Capital Projects 120,000 120,000 120,000` r M, T. r , a4 , z Contingency 0 0 €z'' . fi ; Total Fund 120,000 0 120,000 0 120,000 µ#J. s ~ g0~ 1 r t t;' ° C~ a£ - ga - 5 4 4 a Fe's y n -r =<v aF, 'fig'' , , - C - y 1- ,-I", , ~ Resolution 96-_ c z ~ c .Exhibit A" " , -r F 1 , ` x x Page 5 of 6 :.7s A - , j~ - = £ r^,4. -.N a t - " ? ix Zfc' Utz rt lg~ x-yz+ry rte,. -y 'x-C" r x i e"]`t .r r`'yv ,vw,",',,',':",:.-°'^^m.^".w.°a~rm_a s^:lmgz"?r=w-~'''°~"^?:.s ....,.rr:.#r+; ..yrrR."'F'~«'ia~s~:3 -i>'r ,°°-z 7^^'+U .roes- i J,`3~. f ~-"~p w+. re N J' s _ P ti d r 4-r t-' SF,., c - 1 5 a x " t r W ~1 f"~tF# sv _ F r3.c -fix u tax Is ,z d - x .cear 5 - i _ ' 7 ~ -w}'bad Y r s _ a ! e~. _ F Ek,- > d~~ i` J IT, - ' a' t ' ,f'-s -ae $ fflf%~~ ' ~'j ~ ~ ~ ~ t , ,',.'P~l V~ f _ r, 1 T - "I "N W t-.s t ~4,~~~ sue`- ~.c _ t~ < _ s ~ Y ti i _ _ "t"` •',~t,~.kf K• g~~`~t''~ ~~'#a ~i~.. a xS '3 4 a f Xb a - - ` - - _ - - • { - _ + e _ i"- q~,.~, s +"s~•2 t'x-~, x 3 Ls +~x r'k~ x. tt a7k?~'°".+`# t , e,,.:a s~y~~~tt~.•ccJ.~3~=fi"..r. 't x,~ try ' - ~ 7-.k 5,' ~ 3 x City of Tigard, Oregon Resolution No. 96 _ ~ g1 u#x "Exhibit N' ~ ,.•s3 s, r~~ i -i s yt Option 1 Budget saY„,' ~~t ~M q r7 Committee Council M s 3 , F Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted a - s ° ,j i Water CIP Reserve Fund tl'' ZMAIR" -21 Community Services 0 0 x = * Public Works 0 xs vfi 0 N. Development Services * Policy and Administration 7 y M Debt Service 0 0 N x°wrE a r' Capital Projects 736,000 736,000 736,0000 ~s s r~ . x Contingency 0 ~l < x 736,000 0 736,000 0 736.000 tro_ s ^ a - , Total Fund ti Park Levy Improvement Fund 0l~~t -V MA r s Community Services 0 y€ $ ro t PUbI1C Works 0 U ~N~~ 7 a J 2, 5 r x Development Services rN o . 1 _ Policy and Administration 0 0~ Debt Service 0 0 z s Capital Projects 166,500 166,500 166,500 t ~r Contingency 0 0r, i z- Total Fund 166,500 0 166,500 0 166,500 x e E a Total Appropriations 41,565,659 -52,551 41,513,108 0 41,513,108 -£rt ~y'p srt Std ys a~ 77 0. 9 Resolution 96-_ r4 ` =k "Exhibit A" x q p ; Page 6 of 6 t ~ r x ~ ~ r - .+r..-.~+.+..wa.r±^r~ ,Tz. ~.r~ :.ro.,,, 2"y, Y "l?^ ; ^^:.t'^* +"rte.' ; s- C' s 3'S- '3 rt✓ R 1 afire' r_ t x;.= a-- -'i;-r'-'"fit;:s?„~: •;f _rn,"'~=k=,>rTx 4 is _ .x..,~ t ~,a.r.F'F- _ g'Qy gd~ FC- N. Z5,i tt s e~z` ~a d7 ~ ya F i K r i J~,TtNrMz W., U, -W y ale °c.~„ -~'§c 'tF=. x y ' f', may - V 43:A Y J t t: 0x an :4 =.W~~ °k%, r.~swE ,gyp t' 4 - _ _ r a4 s a - -mac 2 t , ti --a i x D ~ k' _ ^ z _ 1 - - y 5` 4 'L g~ F r • - -.P> s ="«rz _ea ''3y '"--f a ; r~I o-1 <,*.y't+€' y a # ? '3 r-- -1 I "„~>1''x" K. p'S,?.a~ , rasT. (-x.. ~+.1'Bz'r, w':T: n ra s'•r- u.2 % a r a 't ...-.~+x i.:d. r .SSx a ~:s a5::.aw«.#:u.~v - 'r.. ..vr : ' .1 I p3*b 1 a .11 N, ;iLR . 4 - 'r<; CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 'w ~ x: 4r , s;.h,. "s.;,.. i F RESOLUTION N0. e ,,g .-sI y}.~: - `ate' "`~.s, .y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD APPROVING THE BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS, `G ai to- R K cp DECLARING THE AD VALOREM TAX LEVY AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS PROVIDED BY ORS s `'T .11 3 - s 310.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97. W 1 x ? WHEREAS, the budget for t.`a City vi Tigard for the year beginning July 1, 1996 was duly F' }z a ~r approved and recommended+ to the City Council by the regularly constituted budget ` u- i e-. c - Km's,;, P7'i t, coR¢nittee at it's meeting on May 9, 1996, after proceedings in accordance with Chapter $r , ~ - - 294, Oregon Revised Statutes; and ? i € Q . ,.S,z-~, WHEREAS, a summary of the budget document as required by Chapter 294.416 was duly V - , . . ` ~.t-I.,;~~ S published in the Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City in :--y,_ , , 4 M y ~`%f accordance with Chapter 294.421; and a -'s,s~a,~? UT r - ' i-- , -k WHEREAS, a hearing by the Tigard City Council on the budget document, as approved by -1-21,1 - ~ ;g,,'~, the budget committee, was duly called and held on June 11, 1996, whereat all interested k.-,' ~~ra.. , e, g persons were afforded an opportunity to appear and be heard with respect to the budget. - uk, -y NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: r ' )L a x8-3 - SP tion L• The Council adopts the budget for 1996/97 in the total sum of $ 41,761,198. ,i Y x ' r ~ , * j S n ion : The Council adopts and hereby incorporates by reference in this resolution ti I u % t - { - ~ _3 4 - _ s the following: C - r.6,., ! a. $ 1994-96 Agreement between the City of Tigard and Tigard Police Officers Association 1i - " >z _ - ~,'1_ dated July 1, 1994 which is currently in negotiation. ±7$"i,,,'~,,,,.''' 4 i, • 1995-98 Agreement between the City of Tigard and Tigard Municipal Employee's x r N*i"' u- 5r , { , t Association (OPEU) dated May 22, 1996. h , ; , r • 1996/97 Salary/Job Classification pay plan for non represented employees as set 4,, e' ~ 7~ ~ ' { forth in the 1996/97 budget appendix including a 3.0 percent cost of living k ' ' I,- adjustment effective July 1, 1996 (3.0 percent last year). a- _ 11 ( Sect J on 3: The appropriations for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1996 are approved F, i- as shown in the attached Exhibit A. a7 " k --,r - Section 4: The City of Tigard City Council hereby levies the taxes provided for in the It a k - ~ t-='; budget in the amount of $ 7,917,840 and that these taxes are hereby levied upon all ai~+'' - ar taxable property within the district as of July 1, 1996. The following allocation and T- r - - categorization subject to the limits of section ilb, Article XI of the Oregon - } q'- Constitution constitute the above aggregate levy: ?wr. F ' , Subject to General Excluded from x" - - Cp,V rnman imi a ion the :imia ion ~ g ~,~a - > $ 1 r General Tax Base $ 6,499,186 ,r x-.a c - G/O Debt Service $ 1 , 4~ 8, 654 . , n)rsS ; ~ 'j T- Category total $ 6,499,186 $ 1,418,654 :4*w ;mss a a }~r f Total Levy $7,917,840 t -1 ; ez P~ -1 I, ~ ' PASSED: This day of , 1996. t - ~ ~Y 's--,L,: i" _'r' Mayor -City Of Tigard -'b-1 r~ 35 r, '-t ATTEST: c 4 'a.. ~ w ''J >5- a _ 1'o- W z-ia~~ -1 .11 ~ r 7 ~a 11.1. City Recorder -City of Tigard o ,~,z a k - x RESOLUTION N0. 96- a.; -Y -`A i 4 - - F' Page 1 es - -";a _ - : .-++a.~a;:ar,' ",-err,.-,. - ;~3,: °'"7 - " ".3 { ';siy'.}d - '--^t f- F .M yr' k - - `:A- :s„ .-cs.u H. i- - y-:.^T- ~.s' :.T-f`:":-' 'dk .,.T ;sw r ,R,.p:~%.r_n, fy, r. , r - x ..,,;,'sna; M.v;t:, "m' ;t - -.z.~+;!t.,• , t` a _ ' - - '-"X c, a~ - max' fhFc~ I park. - , , Xf - r t a - _ ~ _0-" ,-R r.Z r asg Pr -f'g rz a k- 3 xs ~y t -u i x 957°,r'',, %rc ' ' R€ 3 t r sxt'4 4 r r'x x~Y^'i 3 E3 C`v w ~ ? ' _ , " ,€.L ; r _ :ems r- S, 1 M!%-1 Y 1 a f4, ~4 a ! - { - - y- a.s*, {,.."'fir .c 'e'a- - ~ i'- } ,r- . - „ . - z ~Wa r ay z r a. ~ n 7p- 'E 'ty- .c'R+^- '°ti'8' a y r - sty's ,r 3+ - 71 "~4"!-- ~~'ME " - - ~ , - "L . _i a r vx-t~'jt 3a E - , u'- - _ 1, r § y-w s ,a.. > ,w Na i3e A 'E' 3MM t ~V~MAN- t- .i, E4,`~t7[~'1-" apt-x "I `v '4 . - yC' N s'. Y'tS' d"tl'''.vh+ r'-s .t, 1x-I 4 x. r c 'gm Resolution No. 96- - w' ' "Exhibit A" , Option 2 ! Budget I, 3 gt s Committee Council t ' _~ri ~ r #4 , a MFund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted ~ -I S Community Services 6,969,158 2,500 6,966,658 6,966,658k r ; „ Y Public Works 274,778 274,778 274,778 r7 _ ` ' ` ; i Development Services 1,480,608 1,480,608 1,480,608 "a fib, * Policy and Administration 1,632,056 -28,056 1,604,000 -27,580 1,576,420 t tai _j=Ai -a~x - - Non De artmen - ~ aaa p 259,032 3,675 255,357 255,357 a ~e~ Jri~ a e r t -k Debt Service 0 0 0 ; r * t S M13~~ Capital Projects 187,500 147,000 334,500 55,000 389,500 t {~~4-lam ~ I y- Contingency 300,000 300,000 300,000 z Total Fund 11,103,132 112,769 11,215,901 27,420 11,243,321 rr R~: c - a Z ~ Building Fund Community Services 0 I r Public Works 11,452 11,452 11,452 ` tw r £ r Development Services 701,261 'k "'F!- G` 701,261 701,261 , ilk 11 ~s7 ra' _ Policy and Administration 91,664 -3,207 88,457 88457 r-_ Non Departmental 29,604 420 28,184 29,184 } + y Debt Service 0 0 [i~~':"'~~ r ` Capital Projects 0 0 14 x - X ~ * - Contingency 50,000 50,000 50,000 ; { 4 Total Fund 883,981 3,627 880,354 0 880,354 Electrical Inspection Fund Community Services 0 0 1 Public Works 659 659 659 I, . Y~ r ` t Development Services 185,920 185,920 185,920 M ' F 1' _ ' - i` Policy and Administration 21,708 -802 20,906 20,906 mp, ' _ x _A Non Departmental 7,401 105 7,296 7,296 ~i ' Debt Service 0 0 ~ ~ $ Capital Projects 0 0 , Contingency 20,000 20.000 20 000 t ' lr Total Fund 235,688 -907 234,781 0 234,781 ;lt q ' - r Sanitary Sewer Fund F L a " Community Services 0 0 Public Works 504,030 504,030 504,030-wt Development Services 65,069 65,069 65,069 , z }Y - E ' a Policy and Administration 238,926 -5,344 233,582 233,582 a. k u Non Departmental 49,339 700 48,639 48,638 1 s" zF t -r Debt Service 0 0 a Capital Projects 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 j-. y Contingency 200,000 200,000 200,000 Arm I -1 I t , sx ~ Total Fund 2,557,364 -6,044 2,551,320 0 2,551,320 q x " a - yw. Ih P yl'Y 5 'r.K& (u ReSOIUtiOn 90 _ ~.cL-''a r 4 kr~ 717, "Exhibit A" - - - - - f ;.,7 T s , y -,~I - Page lof6 -hx' 1s~~'z N S M R J e x x F u It A.: 8;'"1 T19~ _ '~~6y* - 3 ' fir' i'yi'SI 7 N,~,y'°' 7.. -,t' 4 „",y ;S^ x^n~.m . f,-' 'y`'v`c~iwJ>'•:_o.cs _ y r s v k a a p i - t y S i`d~7i-fir +i <s~+ ,i' _ -tr r ( gar-,:rt'~,,f i rc ~s 3 V 12 , ~ _ - - - r- ."i_' - ~ - ~ - , , ~ ~ , ~ ~ ' - - ' - , '1~ , . , 9, " , r r . may. - y1 - i} Y.'r-3 J S - u-S* 3"5.Lc 6 x; S - l d r a 5 y -`Yf d - - F Y f i f Y s ' " ? f 5 4 - - - 4 % - - f l -_i z . L ~z r._l._.. , v_ ..~...-_.v~. :.__.s L . _u~.. ."...2 F _ 4 - - - - - - - • - - 1, ~ , ~ , , " - ~ - ~ ~~n',,N'-`~,~~-'~, i r i}c `e. ~Zk„~~s 4- t f - y ¢ ,raj k j^.. is tT[ -I-x%~.d R - 1Y - _ § _ - '"~,...w.S...L..-...rte ~'v{-'_ ~4~ t xn4+-°5k- r~ i, •et _ zi ,a„# a, - "MN - w -13IV:i mV' I, 1 .s-7 ti r ~3.< _ C s s rr~ s'f}. k - Resolution No. 96- f- ,1r~ -s", y tr r , - Exhibit A" -11, r Vf f_ Option 2 Budget 5 ~ 1111111, T } Committee Council t r v 's Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted r1 - V ~ Storm Sewer Fund ;14- A - ,PI , - a a3 , Community Services 0 0 , ,!r a 'ry -_x- Public Works 504,092 504,092 504,092 4~ j~~f ^ - Development Services 65,069 65,069 65,069 zq r 3 , Policy and Administration 217,921 4,275 213,646 213,646 - ~ } ~ AR. a - Non Departmental 49,340 -700 48,640 48,640 f ?k a ,may ,y'", M,-_ - Debt Service 0 0 4 L r ~ Capital Projects 800,000 1,027,000 1,827,000 1,827,000 K , er z Y' Contingency 75,000 75,000 75,000 >5 d`" ay- ' Total Fund 1,711,422 1,022,025 2,733,447 0 2,733,447 - R ~ ' t A Water Fund - azr a a { ti Community Services 0 0x' Public Works 3,759,031 341,860 3,417,171 3,417,171 Y ' E' M Development Services 0 0 z " ' Policy and Administration 296,191 6,413 289,778 289,778 II Non Departmental 49,340 -700 48,640 48,640 > - Debt Service 0 0 ' V- k Capital Projects 740,100 740,100 740,100 r, ; ` Contingency 300,000 300,000 300,000 - 1 V J,. s Total Fund 5,144,662 -348,973 4,795,689 0 4,795,689 t " IM, k'-~' p ~ _ } Criminal Forfeiture Fund C 11 ' Community Services 5,000 5,000 5,000 .e ~ f ? Public Works 0 0• r£ !s Development Services 0 0 I r iiii c ! r Policy and Administration 0 0 ~ , M~ Debt Service 0 0 zR Capital Projects 0 0 Contingency 0 0 ~ : FF - ~ ON r- Total Fund 5,000 G 5,000 0 5,000'~"~r~. k ' gym: F State Gas Tax~a~ a _ , 1-1 K Community Services 0 0 kz ` ~ +M Public Works 490,776 490,770 490,770~fia r pr~r -I. Development Services 480,239 480,239 480,239 t R~,~ E M' --a Policy and Administration 150,685 -4,275 146,410 146,410 t x~ J "a Non Departmental 39,472 560 38,912 38,912 s fi , - k q a l Debt Service 0 0 ~'s« 1~ ~ _q, 4Nj, _ Capital Projects 955,000 -347,000 608,000 220,670 828,670 s r - - Contingency 50,000 50,000 50,000 1 V~ ~3 ' _ -a Total Fund 2,166,166 351,835 1,814,331 220,670 2,035,001 xs, ' 11 f sp r" Sa i~,t ty §.:O"' xL f E 5 - Resolution 96 y r _ nom -u -t - 'F~lhI01t A' ; ."1 - r Page 2 of 6 u z a ,1 F - 4 ' - Ci ,x 2 5,'s - 5 ' b F Y- Y ..s ' Sa "r s, . .^.,'v°a>. A-mk :-,=-r,: !i ~ -I"-^'.°r • mgmi..-- - --z, rS ~ a k , i - } r s. - I ,r Jr S- t 3 - 7 + #-I1 Ski A ,pry - -r - ,1 ;~r k u ' ivr z; x ' ? _t v' f it ~ 7 ina r a tr - Y v - IM ~ ~ - - - , - , . , , - - , ~ , -r ~ , , , M T 1 . _ K-~, ~ : " , , I , - . , - , I , ~ , , : ; , - ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ , T- I . _ 4 ~ M I I I ~gw;i.,I, ~ ~ , - - , ~ ~ . T_'~_-~-'- . '.t`r m*, atx- 4 n _ i.>. , i ;mac - _ r_ - - .fflz I, C4 .C kr~ Yuir~r. t g ."m. ._-y ~,m i r ,p< Sa zs tg. r° -r a 5 1 xr - _ t. 2~. k..~a....z ..A., - g Rs~~ f'"" -t?C. r F _ i _ f _ s - Y i- i~'rV x .si4s•. `z' 7- i al- a v :mow. - w. e~affi ` ` {aI rf?(r-st" _ .t t," Id, ,.f"YSi F - - ^ -r^,. w-•~- ,y a.-w. a• c ` F 11 ? 2 r~ • ~ ~ 11 z, Resolution No. 96- a * A~ - • Exhlblt A" s a ; } te a < , xa _1 11Y u 11 Option 2 Budget € a ~ "4: - I { 1s s Committee Council °i, 3 d"- 11-1 . x r - Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted ~r * f } County Gas Tax Fund u_ - z Community Services 0 0 ' AvX y Public Works 107,979 107,379 107,979 i- Development Services 0 0 g ! ,t.~ I 'X r _ ~ Policy and Administration 41,866 -1,069 40,797 40,797 13i~ - F 11 , a , Non Departmental 9,868 -140 9,728 9,728 R Debt Service '%',r r ! n Capital Projects 0 0 t ? " ~w I K . t Contingency 0 0 ~ --^r Total Fund 159,713 -1,209 158,504 0 158,504 , 41~ ~ y 1 _ 3 4 Traffic Impact Fee Fund # 5f_~_111 L, Community Services 0 0 ~ -1 t"+ g Public Works r 0 0 a " ; r 3 Development Services 63,586 63,586 63,586 ( _ Policy and Administration 0 0 u,y - , --v-', Non Departmental 0 0 }'t~ i; s il ~ m - Debt Service 0 0 IP tg&-x"s1 1 .i x s Capital Projects 2,980,000 -680,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 4 " ' i Q Contingency 150,000 150,000 150,000 , , ^ 'ti ~ 1 j , Y t Total Fund 3,193,586 680,000 2,513,586 0 2,513,586 y Parks SDC Fund Community Services p 0 ~~z~" - Y ` a Public Works 11,, • . , 4`r `r_ tx Develo ment Services 0 0 ~ - X- j p 0 0~ 9 is Policy and Administration 0 0 j x. 4- y " 1 . 25 ' _ _ Debt Service 0 0 A _ ` J Capital Projects 1,100,000 11100,000 1,100,000 q k ' I~q Contingency 75,000 75,000 75,000 ' - _ Total Fund 1,175,000 0 1,175,000 0 1,175,000 3f ~N ~ f * z r Water Qual(tyltluantityFund M a r~ ,i ' Community Services 0 0 1 ~4 i r $ Public Works 0 0 w~i R ~ Development Services 0 p y%ol _ Policy and Administration 0 pwi f4~ Debt Service 0<p a 71. ~ Capital Projects 430,150 430,150 430,150 .3~ Contingency 0 0 i F F 5~. { Total Fund 430,150 0 430,150 0 430,150 s 1-111- d f 4 1 § ~r 43 " 4 Resolution 96, 1- .g "'n a 1 ~ t:, 2- 417 -x_ ~ _ 'Exhibit A" - z- 1 Page 3 of 6 era ry , x w r3 sx,, : L - ~v~' sue'- ` a I j r~ a 'a x 9 r z • ''ate n` ,ti =nt s {?`~".,.y..,. _on-°,:~"'"•;ww y'+a "i a °'9-,,., , ~~~"t~. r _ r, i . _ rc,.. .r --n aLz r, `r'6 - r'° '~d-',~`' °.iv-'?`~.:', fir`" FF P - j - - _ - r~• - -r c 4+- w~ "FJt1. - ¢'Fo .z, d d .C 7 - s .,s # f-s r .r Fpr"*yt` ,K d .t R k, t 1 d3~ _ # ~ , , , 7~ _.i~~, ~ ~ , - , , r , , 0 - .1 - ; ~ " ~ - - Ir sfa~t{ r'rbt -P, f 3 _ ~A ~z51'~" , 4k ' '1 N ¢ 3,-A. ti{"`i t ,S1 11-F N, zg, rte w - _ } ( ~"lwijU 1 , II, > J rk t aC. 1 _ ..I, r a i ~a `6.". }3,., } i~,-q_ F w "^-rFA,•~_ f+-F~"^.R~ Nt+ft~~•..-.•F]e-"~.++!c.•~~ r'1 - - - awity -.}Ras . td3 YA - "w. : - - _ - - b wr j - t! - - `Y - - - - - y y- j. ~L „ ;v - -zA.r'c ,3 €r w i` r 3 1 a - ' . z k y s~ g M-111-- " "'555 - 7 - ~ - 3' x ;p F - - , y,, " xs~Eto z- i.~ ,a r p$,i '1 4~ ` 'EA 541 ~+~-Y-a .y _ r ° ,3 ''~c spa. 1.11 s3.. t +u s >V 3 M 7 r~ C S 3 A~ a 5 Y R ai , g Resolution No. 96- * , l- i. , 4 # #3 u r "Exhibit A° #.s t OpiPon2 Budget a a ~y- r Committee Council s t ~~~r j - Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted j - rI- ~ d ti. x~, -Jr,r' 3 Water cnr` Fund 1 -1 I. ..x - t Community Services n 0 % . Public Works 0 0 t , Y Development Services 0 0 z~~4 Policy and Administration 0 0 , Debt Service 0 0 s * 4 " , - - Capital Projects 2,750,500 2,750,500 2,750,500 q,4% 5 's r $ _ Contingency 100,000 100,000 100,00 0 s . " . ~ I , Total Fund 2,850,500 0 2,850,500 0 2,850,500ti4 S h G/O Bond Debt Fund z~ k i, - r ~ Community Services 0 0 x~ ~ f IS,'a Public Works 0 0 ~ ~ ~K r Development Services 0 0 =a~~' ~b Policy and Administration 0 0 , r s Debt Service 1,596,095 1,596,095 1,596,095 r " Capital Projects 0 0 ` - - if Y d A Contingency 0 0"" ;Sq xf; Total Fund 1,596,095 0 1,596,095 0 1,596,095 3 Bancroft Bond Debt Fund ~s' 3 { - a i c, Community Services 0 0 t'`$`-~-~„'Sa,- s ' -W Public Works 0 0 N `1 Development Services 0 0 " t Policy and Administration 0 0, r°,z Debt Service 4,703,000 4,703,000 4,703,000 z,~' 1 . t s; Capital Projects 0 0 ~ z @,,, n_ Contingency 0 0` Total Fund 4,703,000 0 4,703,000 0 4,703,000. T-, s ~ ~ itt f }r`~ Metro Greenspaces Fund r""' ' f Community Services 0 0 =1- 4 ' Public Works 0 0 " £ " MI, ~ E r Development Services 0 0 -r I " » a ' Policy and Administration 0 0 a 9 ! Debt Service 0 0 s, 'i; f z r Capital Projects 633,000 633,000 633,000 y x Contingency 0 0 z - - f y Total Fund 633,000 0 633,000 0 633,000 . r, f=t.r - -car a X _t - "~-~Fi^z ~a as.yx s° 4O3-}z- c t s , . , - - -'y' 4 ~ F x - "I Resolution 96 _ kI. Y - f, r "Exhibit A" - , *aN „ ` r Page 4of6 t il- t~ a v9 3 . r Q wx "Af 5 - _ P° - i _ A ;.sr:"^~ x ~ r - ,.-.^sA,-• -"z ' s .•.s xs:.. - ,-t t-a.~-',"„^zx i ,,'r, v~,~q . ,-,V 4,•'?z r a - 11, ~`d, , .F Q- _ ] - i _ w1 { a".; vt i. J asO-., Z - t 1r° I W -ca ''ty - r - r x s ''zp f-'', x, 9Sr a~ 1 ~W UE , ~ , ~ , . , i~., , , , r ~ ~ r~f~ - - --l P -~~,i~-$I- , -~,q .1 I ~-rs`dz"`' F ..z t ) f - a - t r r N fir , - s 'fit -ttrr vn.~ r^ l pz t 'Y - i z' a # i _:1 - d i - - - - 11 ~--•-,z.-.~-r->T-..- T:r--,.,._;~r+...-~_.~.__--+s_•.._-- _....,z~. y,~~.-..._~_r; re'g e - - - F - - „x V,-`'"cam,,, - 3 _ -5 _ dt j ~ t`~ - P ffi a.~ Ci aa., t-x a ms's'' rn. -~A--:^kztf2k L.t ,Y^` - t 7P `t~.3r{.,Sz"L 7 a§ - t F a _ „ - ID"t a "rx' i=ce.' M t A,~-` , ,:1 M t t s Y-- T 9 _ N u 2-1a ;r- - a K ~~h k S c. F _ w tae ° fia , y are, , ay FIN* ST i ,15 Resolution No. 96- qtr c ~ ~ Z~ , "Exhibit A" f~c a 3*'. rs kd Budget ,'ki~'r^`~"s, .,a~ 5Qtb- - s yea Option 2 r i ' Committee Council 3 r _zl ~ ~ Ff fi Fund Pro gram proposed Chan ges Approved Changes Adopted x;11 ~ M, o .III f Facility Fund V - Community Services 0 0 F t Public Works 0 0 T , Development Services . sI i r `~}1-'1- k Policy and Administration o 0 - - - 4 , - Debt Service _ T t a7 Capital Projects 314,700 35,000 349,700 349,700 *1- t ~,~#-F`t.} Contingency O 0 r"*v`''ti s ,+`t„,. - ~ ~h, Total Fund 314,700 35,000 349,700 0 349,700 , _ IN o- ti- t• Y-- e w,Y i S ~R~ , ' ` Fema Disaster Fund I M 5 Community Services 0 0 ~ I x. j{ r ' Public Works 170,250 170,250 170,250 - . a t 11 k i, -,K i - 4" ° Development Services 0 0 p"s_ . .~'`{P,.";,:"'"'"' Policy and Administration 0 0 3 -<i 4u_ 4d'^- X t , ~ ~~O Debt Service 0 0 - Capital Projects 0 0 11 - -c r s 1"'t is 0 , t z Contingency 0 a ,III ~ $Y Total Fund 0 170,250 170,250 0 170,250 , , ? 4 u , a LID CIP Fund s r Community Services 0 0~` 4'1 ' , ':I Public Works 0 0 £ 4, t Development Services 0 0 .1 " , Policy and Administration 0 0 ' Debt Service 0 M' Capital Projects 1,680,000 1,680,000 1.680,000 , . r" Contingency Total Fund 1,680,000 0 1,680,000 0 1,680,000 435 3~ Underground Utility Fund k Community Services 0 0 Public Works 0 0 ~ - rf 1~ ;,r - ,-,y, r.~ Development Services 0 0 . s x~+k. ,,i E : Policy and Administration 0 0 N p ` ~ ` _ Debt Service O 0 a-~ F?Q , { Capital Projects 120,000 120,000 120,000 ~~x h ~ - , , Contingency 0 0 { I Total Fund 120,000 0 120,000 0 120,000 % - - 4 . I Lr- ,t, 3 v~~ 3 33 f, i - EF a`4 Y f ' Resolution 96 ' r Y1 Y E GV .a r~0.`,x '~~m~ F 3Tcgf 7 'Exhib t P.' f 7 a- § xze~t a-' ' ~j c Page 5 of 6 s -;2t j irA~.;~ -L~.Ew.se ...^--~,..~..+4 *sm~,ax_,s'.~v. 'sue '..`=x,'x'ra .g zs+:. m~^^,..-- `----•<,~.:..~.a;stw:z "',t.~a- ti"'?:-;~°, °=mot..- =w~ L"'s ..s~,.M-f§t"~~ _ r, c o r a µ x*' > a- vyj n t om, ~ f IT i S - - , s 4 ; ;°F M ,M% t ' TT mss ' . v d gar 'a 5~s- ~ - t , _ - . , " - - - `a:-k Vii.'? ~r_..- t ,„-..;#,.,-°1'--'„ a T ,4 ~ ~ a, 4 , - f ytr. J3v fsyY f - E - ,t _ - - } - = r {5 s s, ~'7. -Z' s- 3+.t'-a n r a .rte rd P"x*. x - a.' z i t d - y x" y'to r "i. 'hr , p ` Xt _ r`t r 5 ' ~ 11~ ~ ~ - , I - I . , - - ~ , 1, ~ r J -1, IT f ~ l _ - v', - r 3 b+ i t- r - 7,% •`E:,.y~,~ X.~'SY.`~? F .L-• t { `a > y i x ,-.;R5-- - ; ~,981 I 1----1"--.-'~" z" ~ ~ ~ " -,-'~'z i I Jar` Y 4 ~1^ - i+ y r' ~,y . hr _ f$s~`5 qty n z -rt SF-wT.-zhe,.5- `°assa`--' k+ Y~, - ~Tf s 4 h - ` ` i` ~i - - f t F.4 f.,PSk.S.T' sty>, 4` p. ! . 4~''' ^•.'~rr - 11, i a ? .a c s ` ~ff~ &A t- i.,t c S ~ , ON I - " - a - ~ - Resolution No. 96- S + "Exhibit A" { 11 s r a Option 2 Budget t x' , b { a ~M ~t Committee Council ' ' ~-m fi F ~ " ;1'; Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted F .~4, jW , . ~ t r -III # OM z Water CIP Reserve Fund f ` mw- ~-Ttt, n~ I A A Community Services 0 0 x a ~ e' #~~"a 4 s Public Works 0 0 , ~ C u e `r, Development Services 0 0 " - r s ' a * Policy and Administration 0 0 ~ x a Debt Service 0 0 er r j 73- Onn 736,000 736,000 *r; y % z ; Capital Pro axis ~6A -1 Contingency 0 0 as - '1~ ° > Total Fund 736,000 0 736,000 0 736,000 4 ,lf t - " ~ 11 Park Levy Improvement Fund - 11 ~ ~ ' f sa j~ Community Services 0 0 A, , ° i Public Works 0 0 ~ ~ 9,,_ , ' Development Services 0 0 V:; °x "0 b ~x r r , y 3 Policy and Administration 0 0 ; `mot, , ; } Debt Service 0 0 z ~ ~ ',i A ~ , ` ° Capital Projects 166,500 166,500 166,500~ fry ~ $rs7Contingency 0 0 t 1v Total Fund 166,500 0 166,500 0 166,500 3- +~Z- r - F J yr aP Yew. a : r ' ! + Total Appropriations 41,565,659 52,551 41,513,108 248,090 41,7 61,1981 xy 1 kt s.t c +a-- r 154 - x'' k$~t ,s y _ i Sts 4 t-_, - 2~~" 4 -J ``r~, xk, v .°z w 44y,fa i1 kit " a3 s} ~A ~g} V .1 I -w I., - t$ r 1' f ytY r.. k :h4 r ,~s r~,,f,sRa'-~j , - s l 4 "FMS -j - .',':`.K~ t x~ S '"xi-t`~ t Resolution 96_ '~yx~~k"~~ -I ' "94~ a - "Exhibit A" > l; E i ia : `isomers -4 ...z'... ` - k ~G ea dub 14 * -Wr Frk ~ ' d.. ~ T . C'i"y-+yit$'L .'3..h iF_"i..%` -,~nT9 - P..'4<3 £"~'E.'N%t+H,L~Tm`Yw'^-^^+n .c "e%:?[ '?x18 r 'R'^' S'rTe k q 5. 3s x t IyT= S J L - 11w. T r a I t tI>s Y. -r' Y Yom' t g- , -K ~ - 12 , , , - - _ , - - " -2~ -"5, , , - , J---~t;,I~K-:, e4 r i r vA x y q.g 'x fi - ,G-. a } t - r 1 'a s r tro*o g 'a _ _ { e 'Y y.r'`~^ e E.n'',a .3gr c rt v. L - y t AF 17x 1 r}5~I x r ~VNIM,i }a', y ~ L 's r r t - y _ _ - - ~W - ~ , s it. _ - ~s~~`~ _ - .}.+>:.a.:-"4 .r..,v~' - :a,x -s,. 3- - - 11 ~i$~`fit£Y' , ('S`-~' t _ r~--- 'i Y i 3,S{ h ? ¢ '9 r" F.~.SFGI I1J i ~ °v 3 WK t - 'i sax j 'X s 4l< ~ AGENDA ITEM # s, a_ &Par . ' ` , } For Agenda of Ame l l 1996 eu ; F . r , IM z CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON r tr COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY x ` 3 r ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Annual Capital Improvement Program Update , - j y ~3 _ ' - tel. + z' -'4'- } rtiP [ a r..d gyro- ' ~s1 r, , K~ PREPARED BY: CcAlfson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK j/^ ~ y 4 r 3 ISSUE BFFORF THE COUNCIL 1tr I~ ~p _v t ~ ' x i t. - ,fir M Y's','at T I " ~ a' ` Adoption of the Capital Improvement Program and approval of the 1996/97 Projects. r t 7~ -'Y„,."'W , n r 5-777 ~ z- r F STAFF RECOMMENDATION 3 - Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Capital Improvement Program as proposed in Appendix A of then t - j` attached memo dated June 5, 1996. I I e i.t ,riz~l a2 rr INFORMATION SUMMARY n'r`~ ~_v! x F` f k k - tl Attached is a memo outlining the Capital Improvement Program background and process for this year. The memo # t x lists the staff recommended projects for 1996/97 and tentative recommendations the following five years. The . ~~.:-g j, 4 t { k emo was submitted to the Planning Commission on Tune 3, 1996. Planning Commission recommended approval , ~ , `$,L of staffs recommendation. The only modification to the memo submitted to Planning Commission is due to the Y { - passage of the School Bond and their subsequent agreement to provide $50,000 towards the construction of the 1 3 , r- traffic signal at 79th Avenue and Durham Road. Funding was previously proposed as aTIF project and has now ~ ~ . been deleted.V n ? t~ G iii` k „1 OTHER ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERED - ~s~ ~ - I y SFtt~a r > j 1. Adopt the proposed Capital Improvement Program as recommended by staff. ~ ~ I 4 z 2. Adopt the proposed Capital Improvement Program with modifications. ~K v ~u , 4'' , - ISCAi NOTES ~ IEEE 4 d F ,,-rs ° r: ' - a t * `h' I r l t j ,r ,_t FS l'orY' - tlgp-4,1, aem-sNx DoC . tar - t C `3 - - 1 - i L R.3Y t i ( ~ & y Rt 1. r`s, '3,'~ - a e S t~'~'.rr~ 2 °-.°"'w^nr;_-'fi r. .,._n~- ;.:,r'^, e~,';,.~.- - ~ t t r f a. 3 g x ~t -a i. -i-q man r^° - mr, t v s'~ - c era s a fi { - r tF cL zM` [ 'j ' ' r , - i ~ s - a,r •r` ~ i ~ y r k , , " ~ , -1 ~ , ~ 0 it r` z1 fi>,r 1 = - a' 7r - r - 1 ro : 'ems '"'f1 .'.`G _ _ 1 - _ 3 - 1 L p n~ Fr - I. +A j t _ - Z Y aF _7 t F - x .c-- i - Y 1` a . d_ 3` t t i a' i fV""' L r Y T -id -tr y„ - 1 ,fin-. t f + t ffl- ~ , - - - - - - : ~ , . . ~ r " ~o I 'o + ~ . I T, I" - _ ~ , , I" ~ , "I ~ ~ _ - - - 1 5, -J ? HALL - - } - . ...-a a... - '1_"_r.``:. T. 1 1 ...:.~r r~r_1"`!AeY I-£I __.~.Y_a'L*~a b__. r _;3-L~i ' . r-. .L r Lw~i~ y f a. tee- r - - - t T _ - ~-`,t} ~'rv z;~h oc- ,fl "ter4x, a,7v 't r' I° s w' + Y - -a y -~.t -rts - El,' ~ 'S ,frA sS a: i. %~a s h r - rr - Fr +~~`j a - t s4'3t E#..' r 3-r .f4 _ F. f F ash - .f4-Yt1 {'ti~3 5 3a y~ 4< $,J< 12 ~ § . .wxa,..x:.Y : Gfr..x.aeu.ssi&'a.G .b»N°...'.~.. ~1x;iY«. aS - _ -r.'1^ z s~ 1~ ~ y -4 _ rY. c i s~.~ a{ i I. ' f -its }s, .11. a' 5 r F.*'Ac.~- a. - x kz .R'+; - max` 4a • 10, ~ ~Y } MEMORANDUM r w r ~ Es 'N 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON i. , _t£ ~ f f _ F _ r x S z , 4 ~ A~ ~ t771 ,a ~ny','~ r TO: City Council ''i{t Z la . rte 2s - ~2b Alfson(A1 ` a t 4 FROM: Gary - n ~ st, a-y X1-1 of u - "6 d % b- a may z_, - DATE: June 5, 1996 1 , p ? a Y P SIUBJEI^•T' Capital I lprovement P •g.-Update ~ Q 4; Background s H r 8 _ _ a { l- s€ r The six year Capital Improvement Program is up for its annual review. The Capital Improvement , 3 M9 I "I ~ I` I Program includes improvements to the sVeets, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, water, and parks = , systems. The street, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer Capital Improvement Program is managed `°i t '3`1 _Zll r- 'e ,:r _ by the Engineering Department. The Water Capital Improvement Program is managed by the ' Public Works Department and the Parks Capital Improvement Program is managed jointly by the - 4 ~ ` Planning and Engineering Departments. ~y~ ~4 Y ~Ilm _ 5, trii, i _ .L3'~°^Y 7n Y 4-• T E' «i f t;-Fa v i- I ` Planning Commission approved the proposed Capital Improvement program at their June 3rd rrt ri -11 meeting. a~{ ` t } Last years prediction for the 96/97 budget was conservative. The tentative list of projects showed , u some programs reduced or eliminated and the project list was short. The actual budget for 96/97 is~~, k greater than projected in 95/96, therefore maintenance programs need to be restored and additional z ~g r ~ x projects included. Appendix A is the staff recommendation for the updated Capital Improvement x ` ~ I _ ~ ` a f , Program for 1996/97 through 2001/02. Appendix B is a copy of the last Capital Improvement ~j Program. t- qaProcess Ir, ,x+c-'p;,r^.~~`-. ' ~ An introduction to the Capital Improvement Program update process was given to a joint Citizen ~ t ' Involvement Team meeting in March. An overview was discussed and the citizens were requested y r a s f to bring their nominations for projects to their next Citizen Involvement Team meeting in April. tt A ~ 4 _ k~ 1 ~ £ t ~ 9~w~ I _ Their nominations were added to the previous projects backlog and to other nominations from , - s - s ' _ - citizens and staff. A great deal of interest was generated this year for speed humps. Last year there r rr t{ E kb was interest in a pedestrian program. The complete list to date is shown in Appendix C. The y J , y - projects have been grouped into categories of the different types of projects to better organize the i tea, z_-V-M - ~ F list. r A~°q r t _e , MEMO - City Council - CIP UPDATE PAGE 1 of 5 ft k P L k E S'p -t 1 z{ z t z T__ TM^ - ,x.. .s q i ?"~~naa- _ .te="" x.. .-°t~," ' '~"""`~1,1 t l 72 r t z r''*.r s s x 'r - - t - r -h zf ~ t °F` , ~YY y .,"Ilpv,;~~ 'V,-,t~-~ , : ,,7~ , V-ll~ :l-,~~- - ~ " " . . ~ o, I , 1, _0 :j~,:~ ~Imll..-,t l_- i r rl Y r;' ar - F - r - - , t ra ° k'Idd tit 'i f f ° } t ; _t 4 - . - ~ ~ 11 _ I I ~ -1 . I - T- - , . ~ .~M . , - - - ~ , t u _ _ x yu- _ t.}s' a:Y ; r Y- - - - ,F 3c'1S.-a S - - - - IW.- ~ z,.f ry~'t«st.~ a - - z - t er.- -..r+'r.. - - t` x S - 3 3.vt 3~! .ttil. t 8t " 4 . Fi 3 - D - - a ~ $ z .I 'R11,051711 ~ j 4- Ii The City Council meeting is another opportunity for public input. After public testimony the , , t I r+~- : Council is requested to adopt the proposed update or to adopt with modifications specified. Staff ~ T * ` r xt ; ~ z ~ A = will be available at the meeting to provide additional information as necessary. t s• Update Summary ~ , 1~ 11 ~a r z „`r- i' Each account shows committed projects at the beginning of 96/97. These are projects previously ~ r 11 " a k - approved for 95/96 funding but have not been completed as of June 30th, 1996. --ft_, tom--'_ ~i 4 *r Yr ~rh s g ivt .k, F -i'l. It is also important to note that each funding source has restrictions on what type of projects can be a <u _ s i x r, } + r `r try' ' constructed. Projects cannot be moved from one funding source to another. All projects are placed` ' } 5 h,e - into funding sources with ample funding if possible. ~ - - I - ' 1. h _ Wis. n,.,.......`_.. a..a e.M n__.. m.... n__:,.`t., gr 77 'Sa a} k 4y, 11~ The following is a brief description of projects recommended for the 96/97 Capital Improvement ; s - 3 Program. Pavement Major Maintenance Program $ 223,711 [1 , 1, 11 This is a program of corrective and preventative maintenance ~ I ' on all the paved streets in Tigard Typically $300,000 has _ r~~ x _ been the amount budgeted for the past several years. We 's I ~ a~ - currently have a backlog of $1,500,000 in corrective r m~? ' ! n,. d overlays, repairs, and slurry seals. We need to maintain as t y f. ~ ' 1 much of the typical budgeted amount as possible in order to 1 - reduce the backlog. The goal is to become more preventative ' 7 - F and less corrective in our maintenance which will eventually - _ reduce the budget demand for the future. We are catching up LN" -11 I'M - with the corrective measures but they are a major portion of ~ rte the backlog . ~ ' N ' ~ • Main Street Reconstruction (Scoffins to 99W) $ 150,000 L r The center portion of Main Street was reconstructed last year 1 ~ ` and this would complete the northeast end of the street. The - 4 c F pavement condition is poor and reconstruction of the street t- ~ . V 11, N 9 3 and storm drainage system is necessary. f a r i a -'F a`Y ~ a na- - - - n ` _ The storm drainage improvements would be funded from thelx z 4 storm drain new SDC fund. $ 30,000 t - 1* s T > +f t i • Main Street Reconstruction (Fanno Creek to 99W) $ 110,000 a This would complete the southwest end of Main Street. The a - - r ti a sm r- - u pavern`„t corwition is poor and reconstruction of the street y I. ~ d k1- - t i and storm drainage system is necessary. r 5 T----P L - S. NN' Y} _ _ MEMO - City Council - CIP UPDATE PAGE 2 of 5 t_' ~ f`.t} r + ``K , ^z ~'',yf r`r xtt ~i , t"_ K~41 4 3 S - t +LS UN I k• z C 'm "'5~~ F A i „ k - = -L,& „ asav- r ~*a a9--^ - ,T.Se - .F S: u..u,~.~pk 4 4 1111-11, h%"'Y' fib -p ; _ It ' r c 5 Tv , C - 4! y3 S i s r a vl t X ! _ 11 p s ````S fi rA -f -1r - a - x t ,'x .1 ; b r 3y! d P' ^k - ~ y R E J S 4 c~Z ?R asst t 7 of t t - - a 6' ~ .fir ' zY. 1 y, z r x1 ^ 1f 7 - IT 3 E - : - TIC ? ...w- 7,~,5,£"~ -1..T '{....mom - 1` - - - -c _y'~•a - - t ~ 3 - 3rs r r r _ Lei te} --l i eU la, ~i.~ - - 0~1 "R-51 .11 ;1N _ - e y _ r"° - Y .r i' ~ - a i V `H, 2;= e +r - v 3 cI - i k fix. rY S~- - E ,,.a ~vP ~y5f ; - _ acs 1 x 7 -5- Sr~~y~ ~ ✓ - ° `+`Y 'TM x' ~ 33Y'i°.~ 'N } 3'x"1 x ~i^ - i S L £ - -'.i .Ym._s~a y S - $ 1 - I i " 'i ,r + _ i j ti f ~5~ - i`-,'ry ;,-raTk:. Y~ c r - -yam` i.-r .x ,s ' >~'~5.~- `"3'' - ' 9 v 4 f - aj s 11 - 3 _ 9,--». ' u s r P_ s_ ~k...~ b '20- R -a-, I Z . 21N. J, A The storm drainage improvements would be funded from the g~R ~ m ~Y ° ; W } storm drain new SDC fund. $ 40,000 , „ - r' • Commercial Street Reconstruction (Main to Hall) $ 200,000 - • . The pavement is in poor condition and the street lacks a -11 ° 1~- continuous curb and sidewalk. The Downtown Merchants t 4 j v -I f A Y = , rte' k ss.P~ - Association has expressed an interest in improving Via. ' " . 9~zr.: _ ra y ~ - Commercial Street, even at the expense of deleting one of the 1 s 7 Main Street projects (Fanno Creek to 99W). Portions of the ' .1 - , x 1~a # st pavement have recently been reconstructed and are in good ° ~ kYU, - -1.n~ - r -r 9 condition. This project would be similar to the Main Street ~-`r K , t project and is proposed to be constructed at the same time. t 4= ine sio~;~. drainage improvements would be improved with - ` funds from the storm drainage new SDC fund.$ 30,000 r Speed Hump Program $ 45,000 _ -5-- ar , f Installation of speed humps on three streets last year have "T7 & ' 1 ~T + i z been effective in reducing seeds and have received a s~ ' r - ; favorable response from the neighborhoods. There has been g J3 ' ' an increased interest in speed humps from the Citizen # " . ' - 51 3 x Involvement Teams, the Traffic Calming Task Force and ~ { * _ individuals. Last year we budget $30,000. The proposed 1 ~ `1: fi ~f'~ r budget is a two part program. The highest ranking projects .yea! 7 z:3 'Y, e ,'r. r~-' are funded 100% with $30,000. Other speed hump projects y, ` i ry - ~ with high neighborhood interest but do not rank as high are 'F , 1i;7 , eligible for 50% funding with $15,000. The neighborhood I f p would be required to fund the remaining 50%. This would take care of the highest ranking streets in the next 3 to 4 ~g ,y - L.,. r years. tom'=; ~Ir~ f. a ii~ } € t x ` . • Alfred Street and 74th Avenue Paving $ 65,000 ( 4 Currently gravel roads, Alfred Street and 74th Avenue are f , ~ + t Ak - d ~a ' 'a f r proposed for paving to reduce the cost to maintain the gravel,,:, :S s k~„ h. ~-1-, ~a F S i streets. Maintenance Services need to grade the roadway , 9 , i4, r it„ ~ several times a year to keep the gravel surface smooth. This 1 ' ' paving would reduce their annual maintenance costs. , k, - x 1 , 'i -iii " s` Tj { Recommended Streets TIF Projects t t -1 -1 e TIF funding is limited to major collector and arterial streets and 50% must be spent on arterial a , =3~ R ,s_ streets. A portion of these funds are being held in reserve until our transportation planning is ak' }a . s , completed. The triangle area has a large potential for improvements to arterial streets. Also, as the ~ 'i1"~ s j - ' t Walnut area is annexed, TIF funding will be necessary to improve 121st Avenue, Gaazde Street, K k'*, ~ { 33 s sz and Walnut Street. 5 a = ~ i -f i a M . 4 a MEMO - City Council - CIP UPDATE PAGE 3 of 5 _ F f > V` ~ K~ ,~j, -'e`,~ -'--;r.r-~ ~ ...T•.., :a; s - { ds rsr,'.c, s3 - .'^TMrc+l±? - x L.tiqf-`r'r ?"'i.~,sr ~ ' , , , --"~.L , - J h g h r -x^ ~ v' y' *kr-7-4 I, 3 t 5,' 1 i fiC. -"~,~p El , --:`F;-,!~~I--';' -2d - a s y J~ - dry •!.sz ~~rt Aiyws } - - _ i..4 -z E"s N;. , . t ! - _ 7 r ~ E. _ 1 s'~-Fn-i"E u_" rte', '`s r£ ~,s ti r'4 i l * x r' p yf . a "3x' 4 - k d xi A F 1 y."tiF_" .k°~ k~ f , i Gare~fy4. 6 1 L--'-- " I , I'- 'I.-L-1, --i", .,rf~'~ 'L~,'~ ,-L",--,~ c y sty - `w' t ' lsf, ,f~ { k-~, - , I 4', L ! t M r , y I 1. 11 ;1 A - -=-rr.---'~•'~^v -c-• ~r^ -.i~g ...'"'C'am-a'-+s-~-s,~."~.r--...T:-2 _ u r h m r s ate, is ts s'. _ _ _ tz_ 'r- - -.r- 1-1-11111911-- i * ' ivy X, a y tr wa Jas azu . a zn : ' 4 v s Y n- !t t ~ _ - ~ " y ~ as } $r.~`a r ``K*` Greenburg Road R/W $ 200,000, t "rte _ Yi k P _L I >!t z The Hall Greenburg Scholls Traffic Study identified the need s ~w t4 i i " to widen Greenburg Road north of Washington Square in the r p 4 Y t ~ near future. Additional right of way is needed for this ~ ~,,.,sX "'s i widening which is adjacent to the Cemetery. N ` ~ _ h , - ~ ,s I • Greenburg/Mapleteaf Intersection $ 50,000 s - , ; 5 The improvements to this intersection are necessary for - ' ~ F additional capacity and safety. This project was also r{ "Z { _ 4, - identified in he Hall Greenburg Scholls traffic study. The E- ,j - ~x x project is being combined with an ODOT project to improve , , ' x 1, ' 4 , , - . the Greenburg/217 overpass and offramp and has received _ - a " t p _ Federal funding. The City's share of the project cost is ti ff i 10.275%. zs `M,•x"° ; ~11 .11 W a % Par System Fundine s - ~ - t h Attached is the initial draft for a plan for the parks component of the city 's five-year CIP, which ; X~ l F','~ 4~`~' `s begins 7/96. The plan is an update of the seven-Year CIP Put together in 1995. The new plan b px Y " reflects major revisions to revenue estimates and changes in project priorities. The revenue F * ~ g,,W 5 g ` ' - revisions include increased park SDC funding generated by a new fee structure adopted in February " 1996 and a City entitlement of $758,000 in Metro Greenspaces bond measure funds. A list of m . ~ y ,y ' - - 11 Greens aces-funded projects was adopted b Council in April 1996. Amon other things, the arks ~ sa i -IM , P Y g P r# t , - CIP keynotes how Greenspaces links up with the other components of the parks CIP. k A&- 11 5 . , ' To tri ghlight the proposed charges in project priorities, a copy of the seven-Year parks CIP adopted r x - r i , in 1995 is attached. Among the projects authorized for funding in 1995-96, two were completed MW (the Terrace Trail pathway and the Surnmerlake Park fencing projects), two were placed on hold ~s (The N. Dakota-Tigard and the Englewood-Fanno Creek trail connections) and are included as .?A~~¢ P ; committed projects in the 1996-97 list, and one was abandoned. The abandoned project was the ~ 74th Avenue natural area park, which was dropped at Council's direction because the purchase ; I 5- m, - 11 t, r s price was not within the established budget for the project. ,'t,,v, T t As for future years, the "new community park" project identified in last year's parks CIP for s ~ s funding over multiple years has been deleted. This is because the proposed acquisition of a 12-acre , 3t r f WIRZ 45 c parcel on Bull Mountain as part of the Greenspaces program appears to fulfill the need this project , , V2-'Nl ti was intended to meet. Another change is that the project previously identified as the Woodard- ~ ' t ' ri ~r w # Main park connection has been redefined to include funding solely for land acquisition for this trail # t. j segment and for a trail segment along Fanno Creek from Hall Boulevard to Durham Road. This was done to leverage Metro Regional Greenspace funding potentially available for land acquisition r " "F 3 within these areas. ~ " ' z _ - New projects in the proposed plan include the five natural area and traihvay land acquisitions F t t' funded by Metro Greenspaces pass through funds, the proposed expansion of Cook Park, and new a a ' r' MEMO -City Council -CIP UPDATE PAGE 4 Of 5 ` -q M -rte " - - F " - - - - - ,cam u t r i Y k ~-I. E , _r r~ ~ , , , 1, I - - , LL j~M a N f - a t k- # } r t k # X19 r „ t _ +y'Lx r S`~"- -F ti _ Y _ r, i,- `5 kr, i C ~ M ~ , , . ` , , , " ~ . ~ , . " - . . , , , - , , _ t " t r 1 - 4. Y - 3 i~_ - nr i v c n....,1e3t, ' ''^,TMS, _ f axw re~~ s Lh~ IN' ~~4,' §'Fx - L - 6 - x4s F'p„E, as 11, . 11 I'll- ~,t , wx _ - -usvv.m _.-^a:aLa,us . .3...a.,;u'i'z # a' - -11 111, 11 ~ _ , 4 - is _ '$s ' ' _Y 0 of `~i'.T cc ^rdj3rI?se` - -F.,-.g s;. ;~,a9 g'.y, s, ~ s r, -k tI"' kw 8i s ; of neighborhood parks in the Greenberg and Canterbeny areas. As indicated, the Greenspaces r* ~ X { projects were approved by Council in April 1996. The Greenberg and Canterbeny neighborhood p e r t' ; , ?s., PE w~,: 3,<,' parks were added to provide park services in areas identified as park deficient in the Tigard Park s ` ~~'-c Plan . The Canterbeny Park is proposed to be developed on the five-acre water district property.' 4 :i ' ~ - s _ _ _ Land acquisition would be needed to accommodate a park serving the Greenburg area. 1' x a - - 11 - v t r to yyy.szrf- .r ~F 4 N A major unknown in putting together the parks CIP is the extent, timing, and cost of the Cook Park r _ ZR f Expansion. A master plan with cost estimates is scheduled to be completed later this year. For , - Y t t , ~ present purposes, estimated amounts have been included in the parks CIP to reserve funds for this Ms ° 1 project. € The park system funding is proceeding through a separate process to determine projects for the next 4 7 s several years. This is due to the Metro funding and the new Parks SDC funds. ((FF r ff y; s ± ~r s- -y~,_, } T - ..3 ia[iiiarv Sewer Funding ~ go ~ ~ - r J 4 c The sanitary sewer funding has three funding sources with the least amount of flexibility. The t` j v N t 7 v : h~ ors r -ac f - funding is reserved for maintenance repairs on currently unknown projects, capacity upgrades as 7- a recommended from the USA report and for the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program. No it - . ~ , ti ,i i ~ projects have been proposed at this time for the sanitary sewer funds. y st-, S . -gym C,i r,'' e:S-_,, v ~ - 7G.. + n k - -s dorm Drainage Fundine K ? ra hrr s' s ~ ,fir r The storm drainage funding has the sane mix of sources as the sanitary sewer fund.. The funding ` ¢ - - r E } t~ . s i• R ~ is generally reserved for currently unknown small projects that come up during the year. Funding t 11 from the new SDC's must be used on projects designated on the USA Master Plan which has yet to m~~ ~ ; be completed. _0~~° zs1' ti { A - - a i - -z • 111th Place Storm Drain ~ ~ , This is a project carried over from last year. ~ h } - s ,s • 118thlTerrace Trails Drainageway The heavy rains and development upstream of the creek r~~ '.y~a i -C: - J.cxAdr3 iTJ 11 1. 941 , 1 r located northwest of 118th Avenue and Gaarde Street has y caused substantial erosion of the creek bed. The erosion is i ~ ~ 'r Avenue to slough .1 This adjacent l he te erosion fi s r'` project will _ llrt~ by slowing the flow of the creek. - . zr - x t Water System Fundine } r ~a r s ; - # The water system funding is determined by the Maintenance Services Department with the - W~ 4 1 4 " t ` 3 approval of the Intergovernmental Water Board. ~ a z s~ - t t k p - t:'.ENGiCsu~'A',CIP-PC-II.DOC f 4 ~ 9 a m s t e ° M* s MEMO -City Council -CIP UPDATE PAGE 5 of 5~ - F ' J Fa ax n r s _ i ak ^..R`W k`` s "'t"' - F emu': y Ys -~y,;a„a M , --r '~'~,','j~,;j ~ "_.r- [ ~ its t~^s 1- y # f - { ^s ,j t ~ J ~ , U. - " - 1~1~1'_~ _ ' - - . , , ' , - . - ~ - - - , , - - , ~ ~ 1,~ ' ~ ' ~,~--~.."",~.'~~",.,~--",-,~-L'~,~'., , , * , I ~ - , . ~ "'i'V , - 1~~ J , _ _ a. ''4 13s t r T, e _ f 6- a Z' `'a a j s FriIll X, r - f- i -91 ax.rt aW A W »s ' VL' a£tc x 1 t ~,r, ' S" i' P 1 - IFS,?i i .r ` Y i p ( / Y1 ¢ k _1~ 11 , ` 11 -`1 1- - ; , I ~ , , ~ I - R y ! 4 W- Ni: 46 s°.',,.rt' `ff's t~- F r}t x - -4 ......mwa-v r, .~..,-.:Ww.a*w.a~&Y' -'Gt r_ w', "''•s y5 ~iu s` ~iassr -"ny` a ~ ~i r k t t STREET PROJ~,CTS c .I.P: ~ TIF GAS TAX OTHER FUNDING k -6 , PROJECT g` v 5~ 4 4 Committed Projects s~ s 23,000 + t z Transportation Study 23, s W- 3E~ 99W Study (16,000) TIF transit reserve 349,000 ks a 109th Avenue South of Naeve 110,000 79th/Durham traffic signal 43,289 School Dist. +r$~~'~~ t i 79th Ave. preliminary d: sign 10,000 E tv rs 130th Avenue Scholls to Hawks 300,000 t t Beard 35• ~ ~ar' N k, 130thlWinterlake bridge. 575,000 t i Major Maintenance 28,000 1- Bull Mountain Road 8,000 I'tg INS Bonita Road 25,000 34; ; Burnham Street 10,000, r3,, TOTAL Committed Projects 1,379,000 96,289` {4 i r r sy FY 1996-97 sMt + r 4 s Committed Projects 1,379,000 96,289 3,_ IRK, M f TIF Transit reserve 89,000 Major maintenance 223,711 « ri ? r' Alfred St. paving 30,000 i 74th Ave. paving (Bonita to 35,000 Durham) Main St. pavement reconstruction 260,000 Storm Drain 70,000 `r; xWr- - Commercial Street reconstruction 200,000 Storm Drain 30,000..~~, X (Scoffins to 99W and Fanno Creek to 99W) 61000 zg~ < 79th Ave @ Durham Traffic Signal 45,000 z t a ' Speed Hump Program N v f, - _ c x. rte' ti Walnut/fiedeman rhv 75,000 'S `IM Greenburg Road rhv 200,000~p GreenburglMapleleaf intersection 50,000 ? - ' - TIF reserve 507,000 ~ If 01, Totals for FY 1996-97 2,300,000 896,000€ rz, ~ R' P*Irl t-' del.g J a= 7 C€. h -*Exf~ t..:~ 10 a N „ cr.c } CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page 1 3yy APPENDIX A K,~°~( ~ "f. ^i~{~* z e - ^...°-•,.^Y<m-,~t~r` t~.....saa~'r ,^^:°'t~`- ,"°'-""°".n'~T". o - - .e.~, ~,2r-.,'~ x~+7`,-f-z' t."' - _ :fir „rota `~,ief,?'i t t r. 0-tv a r u lr~' r _tU 'y jz - - t 3 j •a`~S-. e - _ pis x " t "i J;- 111, c -ar r g'~r'.•c'x - o-~ -.zk - Y r i Y a.,-'- m...n_x«:.s'v.v Y...,. sS' r s a a .rs h f - e pe 01M. - r , - le- ~a 1,= ro 11 =;~r STREET PROJECTS C I P , ib-' _ , , 0z Z - ';R t-' de r - , ' ' Mli- PROJECT TIT GASTAX OTHER FUNDING I 11 - FY 1997-98 ~Vlll r5. TIF transit reserve 70,000 L a ``z I>_ Major maintenance 300,000 °'5 s f r ~ ~ + . 79th Avenue 107,000 LID a~ :~y~~ ;y Ped. improvements - Park/Watkins 160,000 ug, , 7% ti} 45,000 ,-11 1 11 h ~ c, - z _ , : Speed Hump Program u 'c r ti 2 Traffic Study 30000 t} ~ L: 4 r~ North Dakota Bridge 158,000 g s m ' 1_i r, sr Bonita Road .u" n_:~_ i w ntiuyC 400,000 > '~'11'a ,11 M gn° ;IT - w ~ xn a 341,933 . I -1 - . v j`, TIF reserve . -a' .a tx : i zq ( 4 (ra i- st +tw{ i - - i Lggi, id ''Y~ x . r, xd~.~ ~ , TOTALS FOR FY 1997-98 811,933 800,000 i 113-- j } ,zL{ 3 f' • J 11 I, ~ x. - - n,&Fi"" , FY 1998-99 ` ` ` v y + t 1,9 , i~fj ' TIF transit reserve 54,000 al 5 ~ ? - r , E Major Maintenance 300,000 3 s" 3 r~ ~ a ~ ; Pedestrian imProvements 50,000 .,I, . -T. t 4 R 45,000 . I 1 - Speed Hump Program + w e a n Bumham/Main Signal 40,000 80,000 r n _VC .1 I -:iEl 11 1-1 'Al yr r _ North Dakota bridge replacement 148,034 ( n - ' ' g 4 ¢G (design & r/w) i ' f TIF reserve 538,675 ,'g ~ a y ~ ~ Totals for FY 1998-99 632,675 578,084 -1 - r . - ii ~ Z t a _ - FY 1999-2000 Z,~~ r TIF transit reserve 45,000 $ ~ , Major maintenance 300,000 pr's? t 50,000 mgt i" t r Pedestrian improvements r, . - Speed Hump Program 45,000 I" .I ` . x North Dakota bridge replacement 239,135 ' r 11 I y r s TIF reserve 182.509 I~ - 11 4 j c e 'Z.1 s •x r } ~ 2* ~ k5i~ `t Totals for FY 1999-00 527,509 589,135 icy , s 1 I, Y ~ r 11 krt 31's ti rod - ' f - ''1 s~4" rya a , st z4~-~ :,A-7e. F V ON t ~j t X° Y y3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRX Page'- ^ 1i -a ,GX APPENDIX A 4 w r F z, ax^Fs f r-,+r•~- b' r T•-° x'+ s " c its + r~-.m~,' °p„'ttr m - - t - t``S~a ,s~~ K i y ,,~±314r tip tr'a. r - 3 ry~ Pif, ~ 1, • 3' a *{k c °y s 7 t t fi f -tfi' # Y, 7' t 'sl_ r x,5 'fi t - s ~ l i _ > "1 - -,€-r- ,1 s P t-,-,I,- -r''.- f~~.++--.., - . -11 - 4~ ~ dz___`~ 11 - P gx ,p;•.z's« T l} 5, a- _ x - y t ,t P?}?+,{vt't-P.-u> i t .t s apt z a - s ti rr„,"~`,~s a E 'rar haa'~^. t'h - 5 "t J fi - e p• F„r, rv`-`!=°c't r _ - - Y, fpsr~ l 1 I -1. - +,-r Y Eq,'~,~',c - - 13- t ✓ - °7i } r ?J-1 yg4.3°"L r - r - - - - -s-.~s3a.~ f i .sf _ - _ hl r r' # P't' r w- , ~r,. - 1 - b £ - _ ' .s.. f .t _-c. i .sue`' z}.,". , ..«zMAry£~rti',iy.~n N- hi f y- \5.95 ^,i~'ri?'.>. c33;` :C.v u>rr v r ~x r rf Na~~ :y - wn' yF &5 'T X S _ 'i '>4 K-- - d .Er -'>1. - - T'e~ i e .11 1, _`4>r 'v~ .fie - ~.E,=sz>3 Jc i , `six w" • - ,34111 'max.-<V `try 'tazfa,jr ? '„&a ,1,g I r.,.'"bkk•>'ti . - - '"i14~d .gin 4 R, ,:V ,,STREET PROJECTS C L p . c ;t : .1 Y.IT _ i. A -y ."rwtiai~aJ , , ` F'~ . 11 .`j?w±is9 qq..,, '$t"+ti'^Y~45.. h t f.s4 kµd' ai X31'3 - a~k,.J+'g,` r - _ r $=a PROJECT GAS `ABC„ yOTHER FUNDING _ _ x=~~ ` > , ~ ~ r s . TIF T - ; * x l xjE - ? v~ say ~ fc~ q -h, g3 a FY 2000-01 I Xc ~ r ~ i TIF transit reserve 35,000 } , . -_-,g, Major maintenance 300,000 ? ` - ' ~ Pedestrian improvements s 50,000 ,1 < , e - .1 r `.s. Speed Hump Program 55,000 # - 1,,= - North Dakota bridge replacement 00,000 a' - I s X tax i. l x Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins (design) 50,023 t ->h ?_~,3, I H~ , q< a TIF reserve 373,135 3 - - Totals for FY 2000-01 405,135 600,023 ? F n Fk x x~ r zi w FY 2001-02 -Fa TIF transit reserve 40,000 , ~ f' ' T .cSs YrA y TIF reserve 373,541 ~ ,1 3 y , . J ~,41 r s Major maintenance 300,000 rem - ~F E xc { _ Pedestrian improvements 50,000 r-~ j 4 l 4 ; -t Speed Hump Program 45,000~a u I-li 5 ~F z HalUHunziker/Scoffns 260,71411 a' E'0 Totals for F Y 2001-02 413,541 610,714 4 S r~ c a- t t r ~~rx , ~s.-r x. t o , > - G , _ S r s - , 5~--11 Y' 1..=,, x x-k sue. ;n „4 y, ,i rk. i s"~ - t '%E. f ct'Ca' G F 9 ` ti,- [ A"r 1 - ` bra r " ,PZ ,^y.Y _ ye s. 3- . ~ 1. I'VAdr .1 s h,i-x,Ws - p i e', ,i , , 3 - #57, - t.- ~3 s S" W F of s r t ` CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAIvI Page 3 Vr 041 c ` ` I , 11 ~ -W b-,,--1 K aT t ; x APPENT DIX A m~A, ` [LL y-ss i~ ~ 'vh 7 a n y v ~Y f - •T M~~ d1_ - Y $2,4 .*r^+nmgv - - k"9a .o-.r. G'i s- ~ 3'<c[.'SS'__ °.^°^..+.mvnanevwsn;sefi' ~.Mltlfi°. L-3-7 F ~ G t' l`x. a '~a;,tt4 f i4 Y e A' 2 = 1 { i - 4 _ fk" i - ,i - 1S -l"-,TA, ,a - L. r ~-x s - } a -'re`s ",x t4 G - r - r - ~ O G 'N e § C x 5 - ~2 ! 3 r_E" c' ,1x -3 ~~xd y rf'' iiu ,~.rt `z~. -sr M`~' x ,i'4x` *'~L~°3` ~.~~s''x eT.az r`~.s" s > _ y - t - a ! ~~1 7,~tL£~s~ F x 11 4 ~2a _t i _ t34' SY' ti f k f t - t _ P.,,, t= $ ~ii''Y f We .1 ` 5 - - d K f. '4 !4 j ry f - - Y 3 # § - - - - - '_-.rE : a,T a >s~~~}~> Min, ~ t y r R xS` .ir. C~QA Mi_ Al 3ys3.= w s u0,7,~ ~tA,, INS i 3f~kx a~3M1p 9 'F~~ _ _ ? #y j 115 ~Vi V' t^tZ - rt _ _ - } PROJECTS GREENSPACES PARK LEVY SDC s ` FY 1996-97 e N. Dakota/Tigard trail connection 17,000 33,000 ; c Englewood-Fanno Creek nark e. nneltipn 100,00"v , } } Cook Park expansion 390,000 - v Fern St., Greenspace 125,000x F~ t z h Cook Park Greenspace 46,000 .'t Bond St. Greenspace 118,000 u ° Bull Mt Rd Greenspace 293,000 h~ - Fanno Ck trail (land acquisition) 176,000 200,000 r~ y k_ Total for FY 1996 97 758,000 17,000 723,000 - f FY 1997-98 ~hi Cook Park expansion 2501000 s Fanno Creek trail (land acquisition) 200,000 ' a Ash Ave - Fanno Creek path connection 30,000 N ms's isYa `a Total for FY 1997-98 480,000 ; k, FY 1998-99~1`~ r r Englewood Park basketball court t t r sr ~s { 15,000 tea r - Fanno Creek park trail lighting 40,000 k Cook Park expansion 250,000 { z _ , Fanno Creek path construction 100,000 rr Total for FY 1998-99 405,000 x~ . FY 1999-2000 { = Cook Park expansion 150,000 T { Fanno Creek path construction 100,000 _ Total for 1999-2000 w ti 250,000 FY 2000-01✓s p; a 4 Fanno Creek trail construction 120,000 ti J 3 r Canterbenv neighbor park (imp&fac) 100,000 a" ¢ Total for 2000-01 220,000 r a FY 2001-03 x ? t i Fanno Creek trail construction AIR, 100,000" 1 Greenberg neighbor park (land acq) 120,000! s s j Pl' s Total for 2001-02 I 220,000 y { Q M" t Y N CAPITAL 1IMPROVENIENT PROGRAM Page 4 * ~r APPENDIX A~ a ~S'~s ~ t l ~,•l- -",.._""°.,z.`7fi'<44 l.. n ~ ,~?,"~x^xu°cra'm~"`^ m?r^.~s~-•z~tk'~, ,.asa~ss~~ShS++~ 4_ ~rd,~~. ~~~s,~#r € ` a 3 ----W' y $t f s 3 'v2- v % ~f-} Y r x ~s AI's` s RF M1 5 l; x~ - 'i z,2 , - . WNW V- M-MO, - " - , - , ~ - gp , ~f~-;,,;.----",' -.:;Z~ , , , ~ , ~ , - , , jl~~ lll~.,-,~, , , - , - -"(-71, I-, I & 'P h m t 4 _ s P .r _ - ,~-i,r - r s ;~gY,.. , -11 y k"'»v,.. -^i:. "2.± -ssy'ae,'>~,~ax,, r -x - - ,rz' Ls ~m ~5* gar ::0,#~ tea. ' . ' 1e~ ; sas _°r z. e .res t, Z _ _ _ `-l s'~ ~ - r, ~ '3 y` t< astir - - - _ S _ ' k: ArIITARY SEWER C1 P ¢ -1 r ~x { F (0 UNRESTRICTED OLD SDC NEW SDC ` ` 1 ev", Li ayz* stf t.tr 31~- a3 r ~9 y 3~ ~^G- -1 11, ' ie~ F - f,.z FY .lf ~ , _Y Y rte. K,--~~-,71 g.- FY 1996-97 l-„ - TTY { - -t a _ Neighborhood sewer est, program 51409 T-,.! `x ~ ? , Major maintenance 30,000 n~ e W { t- Reserve for capacity upgrades 349,000 s, 7_ 4 " _ '.~,;",~~,,A, ~ 11- "I'M O -,,t .1 I I s .as'-,q-cr - ~ " - 544,609 118,734 349,000 " 'Os~d-- z ' F i 's a_ s . i.Y ~ I - y tom{ ' FY 1997 _ -98 `t n , x~i µ 5 , T L v Major maintenance 30,000 4,~_ , ? y F' z r s `w ~x- Reserve for capacity upgrades 278,000 r 3a " 3 t e , # 5r Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 94,216 r~ A p i 124,216 278,000 - , . 11 , , °r ~Z - -41 r " " ~jt FY 1998-99 , ,---mo w I. a r i-:1 :s,rr~ _ Ma.or maintenance `MI" a~,x'Z'?? rt xa..-3r%<"c... ' - 11 I , " ~ any : ;:-.a, 3 30,000 j,,:.._; v.. ` Reserve for capacity upgrades 225,000 w_t - s , Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 99,269 1 3 s , t ~ v - 129,269 225,000 _ a - , sz , s ['I +t' y~ v t FY 1999-2000 ~ , r Major maintenance 30,000 sa a Reserve for capacity upgrade 187,000 g 'i , Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 103,920 s x i~L 'n -r i.-_' g r # 133,920 187,000 ~ ~ - FY 2000-01 - ` - trx - Major maintenance 30.000 , ! Reserve capacity upgrades 142,000Kxr t% { . Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 109,776 - t, rK ~c ; a g, % i U9,776 , 142,000 t ` Syr ,Y e { ~ Al # ` } -47- s x r- i e FY 2001-02r~ ,4 lk_ r`s - Major maintenance 30,000 4 1~ ° r Reserve capacity upgrades 100,000 r ,f Neighborhood sewere.tt. prog. 160,197 N $ ~ ?1, ~v ~ f t rt a y 190,197 100,000 F §",V S - fir" a ~,l l i l , CAPITAL IIvIPROVE~tENT PROGR Ali[ Page 5 kk { _a, APPENDIX A h t s'~i 3 - s1 ,f^~sd:,s1. s y q,, n a, e d F - - „'....""",,.o'°`°`n'2' ,zr Lc'7c s a„'U s+ ,r- r~ €ar» ~ , k -P s,~ 7 x e`x'Xe°ir.'aa"k.7 _ J t- . - - - ~,y R t * ~ , y - V~ ,r t.r .',fir 4~ta 11 a _ - "r A. - - - rh- w. / _ v'Y - IN n ~ 1',',~;~~',:;" - - ~ , - " , " , ~ j ~ , , ,ik;,- ,,""r-1 , - - , - ~ ~ !zt. ~Oj- r, ~ L`~ I - j - i, L'. , " 1 -~,~,:~4~~ - - O-~,"--?,.,i , ~ ~ , i I- z}.. z?' g z~"v ray .a k,7 e -'4 , - - ,v - x r ~,,x } Sys- 5 1,- ,f r d,.,a 4k- ,,t -fir f 9 7' 4~ J >ru ,'fir µ i b - , d - r~rr r r § t ii L- r-3i r- - ,a s t "'',€U ¢ `~'~a'? s t-F s a 1 - 4 - ~J~ R, , ~ " '5~,,,"~ " , " ,",i ,-!",",f,%r, ---,,~~,t,~~ t / 4 ?A A 4>•lar..T,.-.o.,.f~'"' - .^-r ..mow-~ ".•t'~.~.r+='---~4 _ r^ - _r.,__ _..✓..__i , ' _ - _ .,sue _ _ -~v _Y.~ . 1...vt s. _~p , _r_ s.. y ._t_.~ - - - - - - - - - - - r'.sr.. k k,€c `4 e - a 4 'k Y'r E 3x x t. r ` ~--IP-4 ~ ~,W." - , . - . - .Z, 1- , , - ~ , , ~ "n ~~i Z~~q' , 7^w£' „C 2 J F - c t, 'a t K k..5a, n-- ,ggw -w, X , s x s °r 'AI Y~4 ri ~ ' ; ~..x Y :STORM DRAIN. G G I.P s Y s > '4+~y { z ,~.-'~-s-•4- „-ta - - e UNREST 1 RICTED OLD SDC NEW SDC t ° , r e s{: x - M FY 1996-97 r r' + 0 ~ a t fi t w5 -••f I 1 Ith Place storm drain F, T q,~I , , - z~ It 2,000 . ` 1: k - ` Main an CommercSaDl Streetseway 9,000 g xs ~a s i - 100,000 i t n t , ~;y Reserve for USA master plan x z - ' 37.997 Vv t a,pa , - 146,997 xI~~ e- 1 - s FY 1997-98 ~ , = 1 .t ~ett r~8 t v --4 Er''ti~.rl i Ik- r - Reserve for USA master plan 108,155 3 s a 4 s ,t a k r a a k 108,155 . ` FY 1998-99 p~ 4 rt s h y Reserve for USA master plan 78,534 r r t x 78,534 t & a a -t `'`f 3 a x...m r i- FY 1999-2000 y - { 3 Reserve for USA master plan r _ 61,493 O.L. 7 fi 1} 61,493 ?3 tiz. a- y t h P t~ -c 3 FY 2000-01 .-!'~,~-'~~'i,,~~~~,~,,,,~~~:,Z,~',~~,~~;~~PZ~,"~4~5,"~!,~ , t, f~, [ t Reserve for USA master plan r,, a , 3 43,311 i X F. ~ 1 c - sy., r= 43,311 m~~ _ ~ FY 2000-01 ' ~ q- r r r Reserve for USA master plan r 43,895 w~ r a ` 43,895 F;r~ - , I -1 _ s ~ i~" , 1 ut A--zi d7 "z°E f~yvy C r7~# ~ b - - F 7 z _ 33 yr p i -z Jro ° p - ix~s k r"'~'s 5, to 5 - ~'a +c sn, a ^ t tcSs`ix z ~x z,. Y y r A i - - , -4 , Xi ri 1 1, '4 ih F ~`i 'iag ~c m^ ? ~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - H t V*M r a ,xx' _ Page 6 7, ~F u e - .,,r . W ~ - APPENDIX A f z ~ - ~ c rg z a}, y.#~ s~ _ a - - - - _ Y - ' 7- - -ssa ^^.aw~~ ~n7e+,,.om - -,r, - " ' r.. ~5h t x } er h L A $ N 3 in , , ~ ~ 11 J -.1 " , r_rj~ 3 F 4 't t - a r , - '~•',r ,'tea S s a t 3, s'rr': i .,E-~ , - - " I 1- , , _ - - -11~,,~ , f, - ~~-,--i-Zlffl-.OM;,~ 4 , , zr j - - }"s 3 Y - - - I - - - - - ~I - 35`x- L - ,ckarrtir'-""'a„r? ..2 4 ~T _ S F I , _ - Z75737i 1-.~~:,~ yid 1~-~ -r~ 0~ Gb t - , t _ e a V - # `r j s t .t axt` e - ..s" zs ~F' - i zL~.. " xs - -v'-,~ Tom'.--.s t -r - - -r s jc ,°'s; ` t 1g, a f - si iT z `"n - a.w.,aurur....e a° ..*~Y. 4. m~.:.£ -r. ~y„{~,~°" ' t` _ . s _ "yam _ I t Fi - < s x' ;a k ~ w.,,: - , f, w ,V ~ , '~r,,,~'~, _51 X7 Xif, ` ~w J U F WATER SYSTEM C.T:P...~ 1- PROJECTS WATER FUND 4 , y FY 1996-97 F y Y Land and Improvements to begin construction of 3.5 million gallon 300,000 'Li 4 reservoir at the Menlor site. Reservoir to have an overflow elevation of I ' w' , ~ ~ , sal, r "z„ : °v':' t _5``-:4a= o o v - F - - ` a^ * '3 'U I as 4 a ° 410 feet (410 zone), 50% existing 50% future. ~ w ~~s des r Land and Improvements to begin construction of 3.5 million gallon 90,000 ~ F , ° - ,i,- reservoir at the Menlor site. Reservoir to have an overflow elevation of g 410 feet (410 zone). 50% existing 50% future. h g4` nA, s{xt z - Install 1,450 feet of 12-inch distribution main on SW 130th Avenue 14,400 x `s > _ 1, j, ~ - ~ ~ between Winterlake and Hawks Beard (410 zone). 80% existing 20% a _ ' , % r 1 I 3. -f's h r- Nor _ y. future. U~ z~q, r.R, 9 Install 900 feet of 8-inch distribution main on SW 130th Avenue north 36,000 , + Syr,1, ~ s u ; of Hawks Beard to Scholls Ferry Road (410 zone). 100% future. I EV2 r Construction of Pressure Relief Valve station in Bull Mountain 20,000 r r Meadows subdivision (Bull Mountain System). 80% existing 20% - ,v 0 z, x - a future. ~ a_ , < , Construction of Pressure Reducing Station on Bull Mountain (Bull 20,000 : 1 , ,._a `F N;`Ssw-' - G`_-: Mountain system). 100% future. , 'Zw y ~ Upgrade pumps at High Tor 91 to provide additional capacity (Bull 18,000 s U M; x , Mountain system) 10%existing 90% future. ^ } a # z ,Y TOTAL FOR FY 1996-97 585,400 . ,I_ t 1 s, ax s f a FY 1997-98r Y a` Construction of 3.S million gallon reservoir at Menlor site, Reservoir to 260,000 TAF " ` have an overflow elevation of 410 feet. Total cost $2,960,000. I ~ F $2,000,000 to be paid by current SDC fund and $700,000 from the xt. kr T , z r' reservoir reserve fund, 50% existing SO% future. T ~ os . - Install 5,600 feet of 24-inch transmission main along SW Walnut Street 672,000 < i` k s from 121st & Former to SW 135th Avenue (410 zone). 20% existing -1 ° _ 1-11 li Ig r a Total for FY 1997-98 932,000 ' z,~, I ' FY 1998-99 - Y k , i ~ a ` Install 4,000 feet of 24-inch transmission main on SW Greenberg Road, 680,000 a r3 1.4 from Hwy 217 to Bradley Comer. This would include a bore under -N iF , - Hwy 17 (3100,000) and a PRV station and new meter vault u ' r (5100,000). This is within the 410 zone. 20% existing 80% future. _ s zk~ ° Install 1,350 feet of 12-inch distribution main on SW 150th Avenue 81,000Qf £ ~ from Bull Mountain Road to Hawks Ridge, phase 1 (Bull Mountain - - ' ' ~ r system). 40% existing 60% future. r ~ e # t. <_f, I § jR Mountain'system). Pre;o future. Station on Bull Mountain (Bull 20,000 a., , °T q, ,l I ~ + z -~A l00 2 s Total for FY 1998-99 I 781,000' ttE (r s ia-f fi - key'i,a'r-F WE- r+w jF { CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page 7 " t APPENDIX A "Z# f t-'{z+ - , 4;.~;r:, l y, F ere,,, ~,4 r } a ^1~° a - ^.,wma.3'c. * ~'_x ss -enas r^«.a* 'r _ fa z, y # ' li . ^t 4 - 4 . 5^ Sid- X . "S a r.'y. t a g "'v n E t~~ s z zf x r - -'r t E 7 M t ~ to s £"r r d i ~ .NI _ { k - .~za .r d y~41 S .~X' ( - ~ F- r 3 -4` N jf aft' 'A - R•x - P -x t _ y y>vi` hY LfW 5", ' - Y` ` ,.r t: 1 i F S a"' - 4.-, , 7 - . r , - ~ ~ ~ , - I - - ~i " ' h 7 Y ( - - ~~`T`f~r- ~.ryv--.v~TP(~' .i •,-~T°°~F,r-~`-.- _'_TO -~._1^ »~T o--G'"~~r -s-~ _ . - i Y _.~_i - A ~ , .t g - E . ' t .ter 4e a.~ - " aA _ e. dal t- r -,x r - ~ja" ` ~ mart x - { _ l "s -4- a -S As, '4 l.s.t .`X r,,', Yff _ ,r.. ~X¢1Y 9.~ ` e{fit t i x S .Sr Lr ~ F. s P ~S . -.sr ..,3`..~ Y " ; - fg r,,e`ya"wSt . vs 4 7F 'KA 'It a 'ham- -zed L IF"v 11 - "A 0. " ' 5 ATER SYSTEMC I.P. Fy ce5` p z° ,4s °~i ® g- s: - W - ..k"1, 5 Mar ~ u ~ :1 PROJECTS x. k M ~9~t3 WATER FUND -a-11 ems r ~ ~ a FY 1999-2000 k ~sE' - Z- Install 1,350 feet of 12-inch distribution main on SW 150th Avenue 81,000 ~ t' z t re , T~ -T MW ~ from Bull Mountain Road to Hawks Ridge, phase 2 (Bull Mountain V - . -V ` r ° > ~ z dt system). End of project. 40% existing 60% future. ti. w . ,t' ,',4t P ` Install 4,400 feet of 16-inch transmission main from SW 135th Avenue 352,000 , } yt, '`i~=~t~~s ` and Walnut to Scholls Ferry Road (410 zon % future. L 2 e 100 /o future. s , * 4 ffi ~ x, t - Install 3,200 feet of 16-inch transmission main on SW Beef Bend road 256,000 - - from SW 146th Avenue to SW 150th Avenue north to future reservoir -'K~ ~ o , i , { (410zone). 100%future. 9, tt r j , # ~ s - Reserve fund for a reservoir with either an overflow elevation of 550 111,000 ?a ~w 'r k ,W - e' feet or 470 feet on the northern flank of Bull Mountain (Bull Mountain am ril _ 1 } system). 80% existing 20% future. z - Via` .s~.y ws'Y, f - x1,11 a Total for FY 1999-00 800,000 I1 r,L r Fx{' --i Y4t'a 3 f e z '-ti4' FY 2000-2001 ~ r Construction of I million gallon reservoir on the northern flank of Bull 1,100,000 `,R „ _ Mountain with an overflow elevation of 470 or 550 feet. Also included is a § - Y- tX1 f !F ~ ~ t ° pumping station ($120,000) to transfer water from the 410 zone to the new 4 x ~ xa ~ " ~rte``cr,r-t' reservoir. This is within the Bull Mountain system. 80% existing 20% 1541 11~fl~ v } { 7 { future. yam' „ a w _ L L' Total for 2000-01 1,100.00 y t C' t r FY 2000-2001 u Reserve x" s i 217,249 , t 217,249 ~ ~ } 7 1 ~t - I: GIG.ULYAICIP•LIST.DOC u ~ y. ~ y t 1 E [1Y ~ t- ~ - c " E '."t-P r - h. - j'y h.a sTy~kxf tE , E CAPITAL IMPROVE V1E, ;'u ~ tr611 r- I PROGRAM i ti{{ a ,k Page 8 s }`t - ,q x _a ,a ; F APPENDIX ` 1 1-1 ' n r ~w . 5 t tm - - - t '~a'' S -,.,°"'.^,~,«-,-.e+ran-raaw~rumr~_ s r1,'~..5 T~4} -7 3' ryk'.'T_ n' ! _ _ r {3s sit' " , a, k y5 -E 09 1 x / _ "r _ 0_ - Pte' tt f - a ,t h - '11 r rcY 1 2 # 4z y F x'_ -j{ 4 i.'4 _ ~ Y 1 5} r E r7* ; irf n s 6 T a F ffl r 1 a p - -tiy < y'r r f,Y ' -~.-.-.-.e.• ^r.'!'*-~x>n.'~' "dam-.-r..~"-~e -z r+'e s*.s-s.-ern^.cr j--_"` N HP j Ptf ~ er a yuc x~r4 a t tv r 4 .r - S'r~r'.# °.tfr-'-'iirsE,~< w. ~ s ~"~~r''<„~t,^ • Y~~~. -y ~^^..•'?..~-'6'`v..-~' - ,,:v.~o-r _ _ uF ~ ~ ~ r' .ry, ~rn ~s~ Spy ~5F°.,~''z`i _ Wk -~.n}x ,r ~c 4th ~~F aa~, 'fig" MEMORANDUM:. Yra r g33-;s CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t z - T0: Interested parties tx -c ~r$ FROM: Randy Wooley, City Engineer ~f✓!? ; ~'W ci vim' DATE: June 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program Update t, Attached is a copy of the capital improvement program (CIP) update ez, ` adopted by the City Council on June 13, 1995. The CIP is a ri schedule of project funding for streets, parks and utilities. ~t3 ~ 2 ,t ~vi.i S c The projects shown for FY 1995-96 are funded and authorized. Work t on these projects is proceeding., ;s you F b L Projects shown for the subsequent fiscal years are only a tentative schedule. The CIP is reviewed each year as part of the budget process. During the annual review, ` projects may be added or u a deleted by the Council. Project schedules in future years may w 4 x change. a s- xa ; 1.,<. For additional information on specific pro>ects> contact the ..;E, - ` Engineering Department at 639-4171.x.° «r~ Tt, i - .+';.~k`~~z4 '4-,.fir x- ~ Ee e k G~.4 r~ r~ 'ate r rc r} vc F ~Uw Wp. 1 x 01 i 'M XArt 3z} c APPENDIX B a 1-M rv.'x-aa -4s w - e _ w ?~r A _ y ,yc-' a.a b x 5r -i : 3r=' irr~- ms's d rgg z r r '5 2 - - stir - +c t t rE t- v "'A _..r_ r^. sW u ^,z+S r a-1 I t FdS 1 0 -P -r _ _ M _S tia tc §n ass ' xs~t'v,ra t,,-~, , - yam„ rx 7. %,Ji ~r ~fX r~ $a s. -1 - 11 To- ~ s y I F .•mt4muai,..sa.swaw:v. 3. tr'":':,.», - ,A-,,.,. +aq~, t .+'T., Mx F'r 's"~PAdfFx'~-; x - - 5y ,P~r,-~ r xt 9`~ ~ CMks , "Kt A , '~1 rv 1 _e FE, -Is i r ~ 'T g* ?1¢~ STREET PROJECTS C.I.P. ` R ' 'r _ r ® OTHER '3 ~ 1-1 - - M t"s:,~ FUNDING '3 ='x? g ~5 s' :VNI -r4~s s,, _"x` PROJECT " TIF GAS TAX SOURCE R A- a ' ~ a e- , _ a i FY 1995-96 c ~ ~ a s ,a ~u Committed projects 1,238,000 762,000 t W ~ ,e-~ y+~ x r TIF transit reserve 87,000 2 a _ IF S ~T 79th/Durham traffic signal 43,289 School Dist. ' 4 3 Laca1 - a'e R2 vtr ; ~ 79th Ave. preliminary design 10,000 ` ? ' x` - 130th/Winterlake connection -const. 500,000 ~ ~ t x - a; - , M ; - I Speed bump program 30,000 F r . I, -1 X~$_ k Walnut/Tiedeman intersection 0 County , N -11 a, TIF reserve 367,021 .1 ~11 2021 845, 289 q 'IT s~$ % c•. Totals for FY 1995-96 2,19 , - , - y t~ b. GsY~ - FY 1996-97 TIF Transit reserve 89r000 t • " _ a V.~ Major maintenance 190,631 ` :i1 [_`I~ 1~ : - '0 Alfred St. paving 30,000 I s ti - 74th Ave. paving (Bonita to Durham) 35,000 - 1 ~ ~r, ,i,i ' t9ain St. pavement replacement 300,000 Storm drain ~ ~ I - ,,j 11 + .111, a, x a (Scoffins to 99W and Fanno Creek to 99W) fund n - f -f - Greenburg Road r/w 200,000 Greenburg/Mapleleaf intersection 250,000 _ . TIF reserve 419,702 ;~7~ w A i}.M Totals for FY 1996-97 958,702 555,631 X11.1~r x tee"'{-S a, a rt a - FY 1997-99a;~" r _ i sI- R "r Yz, , ~ r TIF transit reserve 70,000 v } ~ ~a x' Major maintenance 300, 000 '~1'?,..s ~ ~ . } 79th Avenue 106,906 LID k.iM ,"g z I 71 s Ped. improvements -Park/Watkins 1'00,000 , , --1 - (c A , ~ ~ ~ i,'; Bonita railroad crossing 400,000 c, ' TIF reserve 341,933 „ y _ - a y 3` ea`i`k > s r f 1 a ~I c x Totals for F Y 1997-98 jr r t 11, 8__,933 566,906 & 3l , ai y- a 4:V ~vd 2 1 v Y - ° FY 1998-99 i -1 ellil ~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM! (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 1 _ # p , _ A "t~`*-~-w,-,. t APPENDIX B - ...4, `~T`. ii, ~aW'v" t 4 . s + _4r .r - ` a°w'ez--- 'a:?s,r:J:a:2-' ''-x"-' - g ..,L-,V .~auamr.- ,..,....~-.-_7 --wcm wer.Yaat-„~a gyk7p 1_ti: "-'A''~ rva . , , , i --~O'iv ,Tj,-~,-~xm~,-Ai7%, M , -1~111~ , , ~ ~ ~ -.~,T.2 7 . I - ~ . - , - II- `Y- _ 1 R fin'-"s, -5 - : 1' _ } t- ,w,. ~ f y r ` _ ,'3 teal s k -t -T. r ;1X p H.. - er. _ d x 4__ F r•-,.sue', i k - { -i s a- r s,'-Yr-+°. I .e 'a~3- w. ,2 ...".r`5.z....+.t_c_. - - z - n s -.tt - - V1 'e' 7- t `L - :"s:..,,T o-,.y). r a s+~ _ .s t, x 1 _ _ -7 - ?W.~a , . t _ ~ iiz ^uY- "P.°av .x _ d - > 3 r r 'T- r -r j- - ,5 i},` 3 $K , 'a : - _ d Sm '"`9` . .mo t ,5v^^^ r r J a; }`Fx' c $ - t - _ --+t. -T "3 z '-t , tr -tea ,y ;6, t, ~~,y+f4 ~.'7 Fi ~i 9^§f tg~,8d. ,~z' ~'~,~.p c -s t j - ` ~c,{ ~-114 - "U -,v,W,s -,;ycaM n \ d t - ~ r' V j u as 2R Nk ya t, t- 3 STREET PROJECTS C.I.P. (continued) g sL i brit{uf_ FUNDING P ,11 s `fi'~ }a a PROJECT TIF GAS TAX SOURCE v mF , U -fit . `s ~..~"a ~{x TIF transit reserve 54,000 xr Major Maintenance 300,000 {'r k I -It Y ' a' 'k, Pedestrian im rovements ~ r f°yi " ` s P 5 0 , 0 00 ~ =R zz,,, . ~3 _ r , I'll (T,.,_ Burnham/Main Signal 40,000 80,000 € , ~¢R~ P P'¢~ North Dakota bridge replacement 148,084 11 (design & r/w) 74 11 ~4 TIF reserve @ - a .:R~ rz N "t k ^ Totals for FY 1998-99 632,675 578,084 - W' " Sp .h i --f .j . 114 - s' a s _ TO say x FY 1999-2000 `e a 6 J S . t- s TIF transit reserve 45,000 r : 'h + Major maintenance 300,000 ~'q b 11 i 41 , `sr, - Pedestrian improvements 50,000 ~~x ,'"y, , la! 4< North Dakota bridge replacement 239,135 0.r 5 ' r z { Q TIF reserve 482,509 - r 7 % --,a Totals for FY 1999-00 527,509 589,135 r , r x 11, s- - FY 2000-01y`'~r'", a' (Y' a+ qua TIF transit reserve 35,000 , t { 1 '4 y,~p x 1 - -11 ~,x Major maintenance 300,000 ; s- t-k Pedestrian improvements 50,000 r ag ~ North Dakota bridge replacement 200,000 V 11_ Hall /Hunziker/Scoffins (design) 50,023 q Fyr#~ F y TIF reserve 373,135 ' 1- k s a4 g a~ u Totals for FY 2000-01 408,135 600,023{E i T t fi x" 4¥'"'~` FY 2001-02 g~' o` ~ r t _ TIF transit reserve ?0,000*~~~ t g F T. t i~tR` r'E TIF reserve 373, 54I~,u,'z*~-~ i r v r r.' Major maintenance 300, 000 ~ ~ ~ f s` Pedestrian improvements 50,000 ' ~ y,,.,G0 " ~ 1 "I 4 Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins S r .31r ~ 4 > 2 60 , 714 44=z I— t ~ ' a ( ) 413,541 610,714 , s ~I e'~ 1t '-r,WA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 2 I - r S~~ 4r ° 1"-4 n f3• e° APPENDIX B s ~t~x p t ttx, na i P _ °fsr - ,t r--'v ~ -w n 7 R~ r g . r, "U.;7,7,7-,° 77777°"'°..° v+ "=rs- ,tom B °s ,~Rva - a".r~ ~ . f' t i _ -.a wry. ':>£#4•, W7e - 3 k - a n_ ' , f ;r , - - -u. % x- pc _ + 3 ~I xt. x' -,e?.,r £in, f o- '3 r i J'y'~ i 'y'` ,,2~t - k fir ' a >''s.t`Y -e' 3K ,x'r 'j J ~ £ bit- -r - s- ~t`_ - : -a _y,1- ~ ~ {F x m, _g L "I s+:"tv t j c rx."' rat 4- - - - t E Elk L, _ . £ 4 %y ' `sfi r S x, d f*. f~~"bL°!~ "'ar .-T."-i~l.^T-•~t wwww•.-~n+•~-y`.'. R'r 11 L 7 .y'a .uw _ E -AM 9- - ; f L *7S s,- rr t ' z= _ _ M M - 0 0 N -z 3 - x z- Most i AT 151 Vai,.:'•-w,i;r~*.:''a a - r 3; iti_: ~s - _ g'a e'1,`..fs "c +{yi~ i - TROY 4 j~ ` .x L f-2 h' ' K,? 3 F 1 - s r '~-t5 .;u • $ i .xt - K. `A+ ~ Y~~,z~`3-g.,,;t z k..#'~ - # + ~ t - v d `'•k -ate t-'~`` z ~ t'~ ' . a"~~~ + 9 .-.,mow". i _ ? s s a- {s ;r r 3+ t v RMQ J PARKS C. I. P. m fi t 'a ME 40M ,t:' 'Y PROJECTS PARK LEVY SDC £4 € en - a u FY 1995-96 = ~r M Committed ro'ects { , F P 7 17,000 524, 000 I yG~ r h Englewood-Fanno Creek park connection 100,000 Terrace Trail pathway 41,800 10,000 a a , mr,-f; Summerlake Park fencing 4,000 * R Totals for FY 1995-96 58,800 638, 000 JSLS~:;-ara~"= $ £Y lyy6-97 Y ~ rk r,y;z Pon } Woodard-Main park connection 285,000'? , 'A 0 Fa- x prop, acquisition 6 improvements,,. Total for FY 1996-97 285,00 fiE 0 NW, n - ; FY 1997-98 4 two Woodard -Main park connection 120,000 T x fisF-- vo✓ Ash Ave - Fanno Creek path connection 30,000 5 s New community park - identify site/master plan 62,000 r x gg_ x n Total for FY 1997-98 212,000 µ t tow c FY 1998-99 c a x Englewood Park basketball court 15,000 Fanno Creek park trail lighting 40,000 I New Community park - prop, acquisition 105, 000?hc i>zY- Total for FY 1998-99 160,000 Tknig 24, I~~~r.r~~,z~`,`- FY 1999-2000 Fa~'~"y^z~Yr*`~,,,~~~y_ - r e-- i - New community Park - Pron, acquisition- 4 131,000 1- Z. t udfi t tt Total for 1999-2000 131,000 e~~4 FY 2000-OI f ~3~ ~$~~5 i -set M 5M -r; Neu community park - property acquisition 100, 000, S %i di Total for 2000-01 100,000 VA, V"N z ~ U, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 3 € n i, 'sF`5.•tn - k;- i6-x'`' 'r ~ mn a ° . ?t°' r..~u,. p.~:x aX - .C"~^" -r h •S F` " .>s.~,''a,. ' i MR— r W F X- RN SYBI Ony, F - sLLW"mri ' r~ ttkt!- r - - 4 i s«r ryr z~k3--g. to --~f. WNW! Woo % -woo& on on Y s. r s r T lows MM A r. k .r t' ' r 7, r' % Y +E` I 4t r 3 = - h ti+M "1 0-9 y` 4t~1 t' .rkr,~ r }Ii J.i ~.1.,a11~'r e~1 t•;i.' ' 'r r YI.'.t'i 7 dt li A- OWM"5 p~ 1~f5 r 4 f r d 'fi,a -i,;~1~L d4{r z ak.', } ,fr a; Ir S 5f i .s E 1r` k,,' i~' 4 ~ ~ i ~ ,:51a, ~ t'r(~ { ~I.. ~ i1. ii I ! i r,, ~f ,y rt ^ 1 f .,•.`WI a 1 i,,,~Yr id, iuFU'`.~v...L'~iP,'ui...!..+i-.iNi:-.r,...Lc.,.,~..:..c,. _...s,,,l.~,--.. .+..:•s.._,.. 1` L, S'.._ r.i-.-i~w,.,:•. ~ 1 ~ --~yr,t 1 r,yi { t'y.Y t 4f~ .3 4 f yYy tT 3 ~ ~A tk+~ f4 a F rS'fY "L:'• J `fl:~.~G4,3d- t J } u~'"~ - vY,f :•r~ '„t i, ~-fi`S<, - <,;rv AY hi'"~}+, ~ a,wY rf, ,.t i - t;k 1 x k,.>; s,~, ~,L~,r.~^,-aF.".?•*r ~.r+s ~ ~+-y ~'.Y+.t 7 s`. e~; ' .k,f$5 a' ,.aR' °7 "1' ~ « w g ; ~i jR F9f`M ~ a=°'°x' yy " ~ ' t~ ,g+"^ 9 ~a1, ~..1,,.'~.<, Et,'su''"..~c; f - f, !a ~ S, >ar ,;s.? ,{,M , sr J "a " CI€ `s,r'>F~ ~'_°R "Tx f•.V.a ° ^ ~ .t '~N ~.S''+:?G~1"n,i ~~'ed..,F,. ~`~e ~ " x,~ti, rJ lk`,'- +,"i a'i.<~-~ ,+,+y~, ~'~r :f;~S ~,rR,. ~.~~e=z"*.t4 e~€,~"'~>~, 4s,,~ f`z ^•^lis as'n 3;,a, .~~~~,a r~~,s ~adz ~5 ~sp~v Ir I S< '"'r'; a.' T w'r'e' ,yr~ig :„rt'~~ u'` a „ z, :r~ypt t~ sue'" .•s:w~~'r:.., Ei='~~>, y !~~y ~°~:~;t• ,f a - . k~„ p, t ~ tr+x . :'i~~ i ~~~~i.C,.~,€ >r' >'Ya.. y,,~,"e .i;' i - < AP" ~ , a - v .A <,a° {a z ~ ° a a r~ , r.+f> w «t s t-r:m,,. „„77 „r ~ ~.f „N~•s. ,'s""- ;q „,~n"'~' --tk~ s - ,~.'•~^.AP;,,: R;=.. , e°, ,-•,'`-,Lk, p.ra4, , :Sa':w ~v. , t .-t,3., nh;',y ~ - ~°s; s ar' , ,uaC Es. , C'= , ~ 3 qy,_ ~ir _ a. '~`!`i~"~'~' ,~q ~=x',:'i~.' r~:>">., ,.et Y+",*~ rn~ .:,a t; , -P ~ m ~ n,.r,,,,. ;.s,:. +,*'W.~w%is:~ r r,'s,..s .r w;,. A''r'= ✓?!~'"'"`{{1; t . 'i<,' C r 7;t ,T1,. 5.3 ry. ` sns a•,. _1, ai . r~~~fj t, .y ea J;: ,a.•; M i ~i , i. >i~x^'~~,a .r~.z',,~,'p rµ. ~,r. • ',,&"}+q dyJ"*`" t~d^+- ^ee{ c ^z+ ~at`9`-x u''~•r rk ,a n. `~F r ..t ~~~~t~" ~ .a t `~5,~t ~ . S:' _ t • a.. , r,a .ta2. s t.. ~°:a, .Iz• ',w.ai¢'xi;:'.SF,i~4", r, `,:i :.tle :'s. ~'ai,« ~ t " ~ v e, t' !g. n"hb. ~ • ~.>,~7` e~ '9rfre> fk, ;t.,,ay 4J~.'3' M 4°A» '~w6`r`I ~ 's~~~• ~,~✓yr.,< _ :i~r,n ~u~ .°.7~w. rE7rcx«,-, e.a ''n a r.. ¢ h 't .°"v.., ry,; o.,&. s .„tE +{,Aw d skM, -a rYV , M" mm•'Rr' *jr'=. r`"h~:;. a s °d a ,t. ' 3 r.;a°„~ ~ <.,d , a°s, . >r"~ ~ :a~ - i A >li ~ ~ .,,,,,k " ar: ~ u ~F•~... , •1.u ,@ f„x, yx y"` ."s^ a" a ~ ,a'e•* rr5 s < 5' . . n. , ar' "xi.~i:?.-r.. ,?4. .=f"far^... ..,d5w"'~u~+-,•.s5'• -a.u~.~"~!', ~ r r'~3 ,d. , `u~ a. - us': "~'i a.,~ .~'.a r,,.: ~"C::,~.. s. .s a'~ . •k~ t>m: ~,"'".~•"~2, sr~•. .f+-. ,st^' .3 tv~.^• ~t~• c -,.,~r.r. ,d. <.G'~_ , Y 4. tt . ;'"1:: aatt v sue, - L^~~ - ~S •y+ ,F,:,tr3 , , ti ,YV nxfr~[ .py( : ~r§7'+~.,, .,s~1. .F A f.: s;rk!'f'~`,e=• i a~ ":X <r a~ ~'w u.'~:sw E r, t F ds,•k .r 3' vs c:,r .vii.. •s z•,~ . r7:. ~ '':~}Y:r:*~r., '~•'d:: 4. x> s. .4~'' ' ..w> r<,,.: cr:. t C~„ y ~ ns~ v ..s i €:r~" E x "r4 P _f l ~ ss z:T. ,••S` . -~';~s.CY r 2~ .,_i,. -nye,w ;.a:' ..~'-.:a 1 a: 4. h ~vy~ ~i~~~~~~•-R" .E.a~ ~`k«..^~ S f:. ' u_ 5 'r' '4•~r'. 1 ' rte R w ~J ~4 w:a ° ;ys rrt . i ,Yrcw' . Y. - x .J' F ` t h, ,Yf'% d',w ry1'r.^rt.Za i- .q _ L.,Aw ;i,,'.n:?._ 4z~,~,. N~.^ it' .e v~. ..a,c L•NY .,a ik~'~, u+ 4+a F'?:1 i„s„-~'`'~1 h, r5~ ,.e ;.,v~°.. r^„'. .,'h:r",~:f'• G.r r" :se ,...,sir 'fir i.. .'•w ^te~"s-''"~'a4<' < min f f. <3K n. t..rJ!'+r ~`ro Q. „ -ry'^,= t",d:n, a „`'r.°Rix' ~ r'a w~3~• Ni«„ - k 'Y. :'fi 6~ ?1: $[,,~,'"J„ ~R:tL, a, .h:- .0. "a 4. a t . r. , x r r''R'"<k >m.s•"r';a' C~~;~^, Sa ~j „f'" r 'y>~~. ,a3~. < hr= x,a1 a . r fir k a.utM^r v:~r" ? ta :'S$' ` k^ ,•1 : rr :?'«t j#;r 4' °;5'-0 . ~ r 2u lf' ° e,~; r:" vv~' _.nt e>ii- ~y. i ;:y`.h'✓ 4~^ i~F'•Lr. C ,h'9'a'rrS%~e'1`t.r .F: hi^ ,,..ff ,CI 'Y ex S. t,'~. F ~A4`'~=r 'J e4 . L'. , /.i~' , ~"Pl+vd~.' ii , 8 of , ~ 'h . .kT "S• ~ R.. "W'- , Y:..fi. n )f, ens 3'k, b a ?r- ,f r a f+Xa: '-e'z, n'r3s ,y~~+. J.~ '.f," ,~r ;:*:•a^ 3 s, c'>:~:3,-...~ '+r. d ,ycii,v' 4,.r'." k "e .l.x rk i , . 1:er,,. • t- . L`. ' 4w !d : RF i•t': . w°. 4~": , z>~`+° r. t~~ i.w, .ws u .,~~X-< fir'; :3,,~.. ,3> r: °,~H5 'h'°,+r .>n• y,:p :..t,°„t,, .iei•„ "e ..h^ 1g...7...: .,+L,. sh~,=., ;f;:.,: :kY r ,,i it ' tf ,rpr f J .d.~c fmwa'' ~sr bsr^.' "x«zerr i `'~+.r 'L++x..Aru,.,sisx~ii> ' :8 x• „ - ,arr.. 's` . t ^ 2~ ~'7 a f ,FE' i• " r'f~' J'4 't ~ fr t'°s qE^ M`X d's^•tytia - -4$ ""4; 3 y *`r=u~"~a-$z f4 t~l~i v~rK b S t - C'4 R t f -'rpt xr.i t o t ~',n onri H Frr Ott' r~ d iif ~ > 5N3 s 1 r . ti 1 ra't e,,, ? Jr y'$ Mm !5 5 w, f O O a 1\ 9 i L '.1 ,t o o a= i mix a am m ~t vwnm J-k f i -t - Qt 1 r 4 t' - s y ° ~i S?I POO- own "An, ^a J t i dy l + ~ •t y t t j ''1 S A r E ~ O ~ 1 f U ~ G ~r i 1F tr •rl ` l f;G s U a ~ ~G~ _ f t , 1 r ^t`, d I H ~ C. ;z a § l a n" ` o s° k? s4 3« z r U ~ ;P J 1 is t jft a b o` a a z a i A Yom W; :j 14 ij, ;r i t' 7 N k f 1,+ o W i:P is wr.•r`h r ~IYx,~ Srt v f i r^ it Fr yt S r 2 5 ~g 2 ~ ; 5'. f ' It £~'tF~'~^t ii1' ~x`k A',neu i~ J ad'a v ~ t 'n .1 i s ,,~,k• i i ?t J si 3 sr ta,~>fi ~a~` Pr~^«"`+~~'t~ ti s r t, x ' sss r ,~5., v ' 1 k2! _ a«)"tRiSC y? '4"S11 'ia,i`~'a~s,.' + 9 'PtS `T' a•. T-L 's' E rrt.1 glop? 'a7 :!4Ra, 'a'r». .a ".•a,5 ~aa t , a#-..d„ 'rSi3 k 1 :?tY J ~,v~i" cf s'a , I. F ers'y,M :r. *~'`t C ':li,.. n, 1 R} b Y.a . 1, er .'`ke x SY K ~4 a`.. `yw-nn ?C^'ri;:,e s:`d'. "'i.,. "!.x~:. w~„I - .,,,a::'.= F<.,. a, , h a i „ a`" . ,fiy.; r x >x v ~ ' fr :sa:•c. x'' ,"r k.a ~i Kr 1 - ~"."s a"•:+. ,..~=_,;w,r.>•,'a. x~.~„v`12:~•.+.a. aK. ~ d: ``vd,.`. -&.,°,"a.`*'c,=r J_?'. ..'a..y:e":. •t a, wg", 'Y X'a 4v a ^tfr r r. 5'E v L .,s,.-a,•rt a-t :x... .4"' t`y4§ti";: ,.,,vim.' ..4,: ,-i.:^~ x ~q. xaa •r'~., t x- ^ v714 E , z; a.y« w:X;.-: .4`x. , a s,,, d 7. Ca f erg .a . 1e r d f , Hwy- r +r~++ %r„ u1?' L r' ^cr,: ..<'(`r sn .ti ~.4'S'~' :o- «F--^ f ,Y, z •'s i+ ~ r s %t=••'.' '+"kr , ,">f18r,,, I"y 4 ' v 3` a'$. may. ,`7",,,✓< LS;' ^sa-1'+ xD-, Jr'" :>t4 J '1'"r. ,h' g~ {yp rM ~r ' z~ ~ ,:Srr , du,•i, ++'a_ , a=, _ ,.r, . a :.ta + .a ' n , .~u - & •Y'J tl• P,, yy~~~~,, d'~ ^ v~E EE 1 ! y.~{ , ~ ~`y, ,',rL', r N C., i °Ti t', - ta'~ r"~. °-^t ?ro r~;.. ,~=•.,z•,t..: '.'~5 r•a+m.s, r,~r,.gs~.t- '~n:w ,~,;q,%~,,, rP~' u`}' N . ' J ~t'' ~ • B-✓.,+Y, kP'`v.,•,,5 :r, h r,S'v n, n45 d a*i -hx.<M „'s '+'.5"`„f4-'•q';4~%tX' ,tv,~^ ..,y.~,,, 5.., ,«v°; .2c.' ~z°ea., la:,x .k, ,u-a,.e. 4✓- .,+h1 .x:,o- 3=.r„ ' P ly'a.., - "5r< ;n4,ti , a - ^4a <••a" . „x a..,:~,< "'~'.,t, t.,r r,c,:,,t,, ^ •„+"e. z..•,a ' n a: •c,F. "s'. -a.,fi;k .,'.a;. _.1;' eut.r,r,. u_r_,, a• - `zs ,;a ~M1££{ .LS:rs,s n~.~ ak~3'.~ .rCf" 9 1•,a y} wr Y,_r.is kr,ra;'.,; ut ..Y .e,,a`.~ ~'°ks~"4 .,Y"'i~ -4,v `-`4'^, ^~r; - "~kb.. 't4 is u. r,,: ~X'Y'+t '~r, fR.S,:•9' "S' ;v~i,.v - ':x3 •-N "k S:'+, r,,R, f 4-"~t. ,,a, ,.'r>;4 Ste„ ~'v s s'r„ , p" .si~:9° ' `a s,k: , ar' ,s+ g. -;>t,r rr , ..Xr, •:C' 2 : ~t'e+.g6 wt'i'n "'PJ,'.5- amr sr' z.,., .v4' '•x .r.. -e, kr ~s ~.f v .F~r, , +j + ti r,•eYr..z.r 51=,.':t .,"~'.k~,, r t avre"^ ri"r g *•S e, .,.s-., .x,• i''^dnt,~ .,,e .rt •w d'`~;'e ..f.• ^xa• r"*' 3 a°`~!': 'n`,. 3?'•, y.. 4, ~ e.G~"` •E"m• ..••,4 f:, ,+X' ,;~a. w1 a,'~ -_t-", ~"';".'~-✓s'_.. 41" s,'+ R'4= , ~ , i t°' 3 „1 - K , rsfac ` fv x. N i« ~ ary - ~~°w-„'~ reu^ ` z ',',°,T .7 1,$<. r= .,•it •f. , .a'Stb' 'i~a =rs' - ^'P' , a .re;.rr, .c,e~ ~4 i t „x a"°•`='i` t ru [`tt' a.~ ,rarE" pp "M{. , y, s ' l- . zy ^'E".•.N ,nYa a~.•, ea>^r •w,rrs ,,,y, . r v3r ,aR ,say. > t.?znu,. ~M A ~ f - ,5. , IaMA 4. 5Jt^v <JL°~c 5. f 4•CR d-v P `S'+ei`,.y . Y i . qq ° yy,, b ~e:'-S., ''a 'r~ " t . tl~.~i'k ."~'Z. A?N'r ~ -'P, t''t )Y, wIti skb'!+4° "5 ,^•~t~ Yv Kd- Sa,_,-} '°~C sk~. -r n~ra w. ~r. h= , w . ? •rpPt'? . .W: Y'', ~ L>,o- . a~~5 , ~4 a .a .c 1 +k 5` ' , d, 'Yi' ..pp h✓,F. i ,x^D' "'I.,'. .li .4 "ti^'rLat:uc a ^,i', r ~ m 4"(; vffir.r 4 ~ ~n+ TMek. x;. ~.'a • a-~s. .,t_.,. 'grra:r ;"n.," n < F, ~ r •d~1° y„ J, .$iv g ,r •ri':,, '7".~ 'ti, 5 '4n+ ~ sr .~~,z b?:k'+" ~ . S uZ4:o-~ 4~ ,4.h. ,.reG` 1, ^ax ts'+^ .E' ',w•.'r w'~-.3"4=Y~ -.'31 f1 '+a F,C,k i4r~'SM 1.r ^'~'~'i _f]k''1 ~c +w4. 4g,:4 • g n!"[,.r .f Rn„ S" 4. F d .C' ~~;'a'^,.,,, 'fi'r n trc•,xr".x .'L ;~td:;s.`;r` ^,s~.'~•. .t ° h. k.. ii w t`;e„ 'ii'r°~'.A. ,F'+ .~'rn'•` y "'=3r 4~'w`jr t. r. rb- 'Y- m§• .+k >,'a:E~#. g' ,w Xr ~ .a„r,. .':S':s .t A;:a r. k`5.2~ ~ m~'. •r!: x, .d K M~', ,~x« xr .`~xa,:" =ts~, ,,t`;~+'?~r ~j, ~•_•i•^ra€F .y r.:nr-4. r, ,~.,ac..era, .3..~.,,,.>. .sd~`~r,...- u.~"~.~..h.~r.:t,5:r,,.,,,.iv_-n..,..i.r„arv:?~,'v~4&..._._.,,.F,l;`:~'t,'1?~~''.'`:fa.}r#,"" .,•~~',ry":,.r. t5 sl rilcr5k „e •'.n. ,.,.,.,-,,,_r__r_xs,,,,.°,5:E+...Fya;#o-a-'3?,-::.r..,.~„},.r~;*3iY:`„~u,='~.?.~~.x~3r".~r~,-.~rssops.m.x;':d^t, t.~1~<,aP~':~:~,'-:5,w'~s :i.' -QU x`u-'e'' - At lot URN aw Ir- too nor s `sr L re rcas' E Al a%g PIN e.,vr +r» ~ ~ ~ i £ _ _ r _ r - r ~ ~ Y, - ~~~z zz3 _°'~~a.-r•sfiy-L~°.:'~" . s~ >C # a x _ sr i ~,~*~zr - h r- -k -;,v,-., raY^.+t. 3..''...aru~..ar..r.-,>.-ms,,,,_,a,___ •3..'K+-s.^.~ E ERA- EVMI ypf c1 r ~l< f SANITARY SEWER C I PAk a ?yN R*~µs-,'~.-f~`,`'.t ; UNRESTRICTED C•'t.''"W OLD SD NEW SDC<r :rasa t j MI, i a ? x FY 1995-96 W- Committed projects 20000 10,000 Major maintenance 30,000 `s Reserve for capacity u as Pgrades 589,500 1,388,000 y 7r 5 Neighborhood sewer ext, program 425,335 s Ap 2 , " tS~- Milton Ct. sewer zing protection 30, 0005 rK Utility Mapping 25,000 4 a € xr 2 3 K 530,335 y^t4 599,500 1,388,000 FY 1996-97 F£ F Major maintenance 30,000 .yam Reserve for capacity upgrades r gas ` Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 88,734 349, 000 { L 8,73T 349,000 fi o r * - FY 1997-98 ~ '~sx r F a¢ Major maintenance * { 30,000 >t~ .c ' Reserve for capacity upgrades f~ 4 278, 000cw, .g - z, Neighborhood sewer exv prog. 94,216 - 124,216 278/000 } c FY 1998-99 F s e 4~ -'k L Major maintenance g~ 30,000 o Reserve for capacity upgrades x~ "'z £ J Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 99,269 225, 000 k ar- a 129,269c{'f 3~ F 225,000 FY 1999-2000 r p~m Y y x Major maintenances ( r c~~a 4 a 30,000 v 4 was s a Reserve for capacity upgrade 187,000 Taa¢ z" Neighborhood sewer est. pro g, _ 5• 10.,,920 ~ rJ ~t ~y~"'N-:•'~" a3 "D133,920 187,000 y e r µS. yarrv ss' `"`e t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (adopted 6/13/93) G Page 5 ~ r ('Si'6a i:'.°5;~ „;y~;:.f.,+-'^" wP. ..".°`iz.-°." .e,j; ,^r 'x`v'- '^r ~..,,7. e,+ w.ce ~+mr..s2 "::m '0 pnnh ~F - z _ - - - - -x ' vM MI 440MIS, -e 4 ~Vvo~ ARE. I R am, ~4'i K -ey l f J-. } t - $ h on-RE 7~~,-~rffRM Klu, h' c✓, XY , vsr, y Tx, ra,..- Y 6 4- 11 8 3i z- s s r rm t r ;rd .r a - ens no" ' '""'4 e r ssF - r s - - _ x Ss" q ~ .2,~'^q~-`i -fie rf r c - s r ~ a -j -rut Y'_`r,+-fit [ t.~ Y r, - t - - y r Sx •y3:P. 1. `i I 3°TM `f ."lyA'#' ~'f -T.tr z - _ " _ y „fq ;6S Na~.nk:,v f_f MAN 01, BMW miss "Aa&Q- Cox two 4 D;?" St, ~s3i nr x r1 ` w t a _ C t f rYS b4 +~h - (n,- y - i I 3 1' ck n -j: C :~~,'3K~"~'h, s, ~s f~ i - ~ - { x lG y w~ - "+y`'s' *s a s ct. s * ~ AWNg~` M-M V 4 V K W.- U-1 Fs. -gya ~ s SANITARY SEWER C.I.P. (continued) ~ir~ FY 2000-01 + Major maintenance 30,000- e Reserve capacity upgrades 192,000 - - ag Y Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 109,776 , 31 P ~ t 139,776 142,000 s ' t4-t FY 2001-02 -L" s- Major maintenance 30, 000#£ Reserve capacity upgrades 100,000 - F Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 160,197 c5t{'- 190,197 100,000 V-. K pit •~~~'~~i. ,F x`2'4 ~d?Y 2 - •,..v~ ~ a~'- ~Y Y" ~Fy'j=G~'.. •aiP'(kRr~.. 1, is i~~ ~ =°C.r - ~ W,e `W - U,4 mg, Wil s s r rr Jrs,,~s. aire, E t y NMPOA& 2 CAPIT?L IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (adopted fi/_3/95) Page 6 ~a ufr APPENDIX B Fc't dkr .~->°~.sy'~a^',-auk-`.~u,w ¢~'ae:""''es'F""-.~,.r, -L;~~va~ .i"' ar r^ - R, R -L m °n" s n « r r f r : r ( t # - y *r ,r," SRS ,~,v y* [ - Y+F'"`.,x ¢ SC 1'Y~3y~x MOP; A ,t era n'7° u ~4 - £ fi - R.. Fy t '`#t"s °^"+e - rm, t t rh t T yF -,sue-t b ~m.~ ZMMNIM~ nG, b - } .nf r 4 a Y v - Y",,,., Zk ~f r -a ;,`CP.'s Y t`yL T gay dam Eli, Ammy-1- Q solo- TkA MY MOVE. 0-1 ngq r I ';z WMN C5, 0 .12 e ..a Wy,~- FE t&R - h~--°-L F~S'i.. ~ amp .~awa~i~.,Sti - - S - u•"~~.i"'~~'~'{z . I 4 ~.'f"pNS',a STORM DRAINAGE C.I.P. v-r°# ~aa n1 UNRESTRICTED OLD SDC NEA SDCz"~ - "NAM 2 '.ARC -fr'. fi u~ -F .ba i ant g { p FY 1995-96 P a in Q"' r~ s Committed . projects 80,000 82,000 200,000 - ~ e -gx- - Ash/Scoffins storm drain 50,000"` 4,f 4~v~~ ytk' f 4s~{e tom111th Place storm drain 55,000 Reserve for USA master plan 49,000 518,446 ANIR 11'e r fw - ii~ 80,000 236,000 718,446 6~~~'~~} i F t - IN t rx2~ 4` ~g ag~}~ j x-i's'xF ro c t,- FY 1996-97 r'-.P z a-'s~~ 1 t sa~-;r s s - 2$i,zsr+,,.sz -sus 1: "tj _ Reserve for USA master plan 1= ,997 MOT ~a any VMS- t, 0 146,997 r, FY 1997-98r x > r r£ Reserve for USA master plan 108, 155r) 4 {S> yam, s*- diw, t`~ u rf s°s3«`?y~i, _ o 3- -0- 108.155 FY 1999-99 way AS xz = Reserve for USA master plan 78,534 ;Yrpt -0- 78,534 " yak' FY 1999-2000 'N' IOWA 1 Reserve for USA master plan 61,493 -C- 61,493 0,1 age SIR a r isF C _k x~ q Reserve for USA master plan 93,311 j , -0- 43,311 nag a], a. .5{ - C 5 tiF d'"a.J„t D - =Y 200C-O1 AZT' 4"`.t' v)€r L r Reserve for USA master plan 43,895 )krgot rr !WN Ng 'xzxs -0- 43,8954x4 i.t t AWN, Ra's '4g 4 man W CAPITAL PROVE ENT PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 7 hs ~,.1-'"? ?a g APPENDIX By, y Dion, r k ~5mom s +E , 3 ~y Room 5x"4#>`~,~, MEN V "own 0-5 tA"rss' QK-~rv'w1'" x'~`_Scf`- _ - z w~JR'.r'a 7s yp; y...- S ! 'mm ~ rc+s'~ t s-~ r ate-' 1 ry r „ s u - * - r t. - - # . P gi#a V Moog Orr ~05 440 Lam ! 1 J L gut qn- ~ 4 s€"~~, '`s r s.t 4 tr / r !4 $ "rs 's'S,"b a E ~ a.S~ a ?'-A,rRA NN12 MR too; ;Tt 10 51 TV Amp Noe -',r.x~S,,tra, tM f,~§ s MON ggw Foss .i WATER SYSTEM C.I.P. `i Y L 3 § # WATER FUND a-4µ" r FY 1995-96 3-0 kx ; 1211 Committed projects 50,000~rl } ny North Dakota St. pipeline extension 70,000` T - F Scholls Ferry Rd, pipeline extension 40,000 x n ':3 Pleasant View pressure reducing station 20,000 x Highway 217 crossing replacement aaz 270,000 m 3 Utility Mapping 25,000 1". W" not Reserve 164,962a~ x s: r 639,962 s~ NO. Fr~3c t FY 1w96-97x ' s Reserve 388,388 ; 388 r"_; ! i `fit arc ~ ~ r e 388,388 N v ° . }may FY 1997-98' 3 14 r Reserve 359,325t~~~ _ rr3 ~i F { t a Q 359,32T + i} FY 1998-99 _ s 3 a Reserve 327,819 k s $ u ek 327,819 f wfi FY 19990-2000 ` `s- Reserve 293, 733; r s r # , 293,733 t 41 1 r^Y 2000-2001 ~d k hw, Own , 1, 11 mot, Reserve 256,925 ~ LI. F mss?.`' tia _ 256,925 Von, Q- ~1 FY 2000•-2001r~ t Reserve 217,249 ? + owls! dew,d s » 1 t ru 217,249 FS t -`z r ran _g g.z~,'tl L 4 3},y4 f 4;1 ' 't >a "k' 4 F tta N Om s R. r CAPITAL IbiPRO#~uEP1T PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page B B ~s~ rY ~1- - ..'se."°""°"r'~rcasr~:'s.4-c~s. r.a•;m~ ~J'~.c~ ;s "~„~.,«.~^°~.+a^w*-~*rr°F+c`~a'fF- ~~-r~?s t~ E'j ~ y.~~'~.y~~ e x~ z ZOO 1 t£a.N?X`t'^w >s`xt -~s. - xr ei r- a,,y'w' §u'if k~`tli,~TM~ra y"F NO U.. awl- mom W-M "my 11 Glyn Y- z X" F-,#: y 1{[[ t r - a = F rev. 'K~vys,f,;' "w a rfe "sib"' r~-K ^s' r x; L _ d f- 4 C 'L' 119A - S F} 'Y i Cstr ~-Y -•5 ywr1--'k" 4 moo 1 onto. yooyan 'Y~} k _ 3'~ zk r~+=p yt~n"v s7,~ ' - 7 r r a k - P' a~ r'x's, SKY, a 05A `Y M a4_ - r - - ♦ - 1' d rz -s.,C.r£ s~-Xr"° [ 64'x' rr'~?+y » a Ass ter.. - j _:V 8; -ai- f d+ .3' _ t,a - T t t 't arg z -a j"c,r 'mow t_ ~7 .s a ~^.},.yf:q~y. z _ - - c s'~ =Y -~a}.xf sue,' S x y~ AJ, AM, pia' rs r ; L CIP PROJECTS. BA Sir. sw , - CKLOG <a M 0 Pea` '~i CIP TIFyfi$ ° - Traffic Signals 79th & Durham 50% 50%t u$x~wR~ j t L A Burnham & iviain# o a T 44 Rf y h & z x 98th & Durham T Tea t, Tigard &Tiedeman 50% 50% $ O'Mara & Hall 50% 50% Walnut & 121st T y ~rix~ } wit Flashing Light Walnut & 12 1 st T~ f~ t ¢ Street Widening 79th Ave, Durham to Bonita C~ ~ { Battler. 93th to 100th C } fkz 7 „'rt North Dakota, Tiedeman to 121st C ty 4Ir'=< Tigard, Tiedeman to 115th C aa*; -s ? Benchview (Vision), Bull Mtn to Mistletoe C " _ Feed and Seed C Burnham Hall to Main 7 t Bonita, RR to Bridge I ' a _ i"- - Tiedeman, Greenburg to Bridge T ~yw-~ f z M ` 121st, Walnut to Gaarde St Vs c w " r k`' L s z Hall, 99 to DurhamAIN to T~ n Hal,, 99 to Washington Square T° °r r _ ` 1 r~ IFS Intersection Sattler & Hall - Left Turns C rate ' w Walnut &121st T r~ - *r No Dakota &Tiedeman 50% 50% r~ ~ 74 r x' Tigard &Tiedeman 50% o 50% F ks _ ,Fat ' "s a _ -a O'Mara & Hall 50% JO% ° X * r Ia Ya e''} 'w " ~Ve Scoffin/Hunziker & Hall 25% 75% s x.- Hail atSattler - Left Turn T`f~ Hall & Fanno Creek Dr - Left Turn Pedestrian R''3~.ep3TY ! ~1 Improvements 99W " C v}~ E 72nd. 217 to Boones C '0 S u Hall, Durham to Washington Square C z=` Garrett, 49W to where sidewalks begin Walnut. Tiedeman to 121st C , f Lincoln, Greenburg to Commercial ' ¢ t ti~r F * k ' ' CIP PROJECTS BACKLOG y PAGE 1 r APPENDIX C a~ ci - ! 't a a W .}-.1 S~ r.. ,sit t w3.5.- i t*$,~-"°^' .z=a", a ,rr•c -xun~--r.w ,.v>.a.~e~_s.et y~s~r-*t'{+~35'^r 3 - !qf''-E-4h'.NE e x * a r }v ~ ar VOW RN AMP 7++- rh'Y h f yF x.A J Y f. Y S - _ _ 4 - ~ J 4 ~ Lam. #.(4 k`y°"'- ^Y ]kre,q sak,.cy" p Vt I N -:k - _ §4 Z K MOO 1212'. e'S'r~~3~'~.'+-S*i 'i~@sCN-.3FA Ki .M1' iY ~ _-•_T - - - - j,. _ ._-.4~ • iZ ~+~+.~s.7 ~ »u ~ f- - f ~ ~ ~xa c ~''z.o-ax".~"-r-+"~ a t~? ~r3'~xz$£'zr "'i } x.,k3 F _3- 1 s }r r > Lii' .ai' Ya- -s.av Y - - x- 'k *t F* Am a 5 %3.n a "Y ` LOCATIONS WHERE SPEED HUMPS HAVE BEEN RF,OiJF.STEI) 9 Ell . (In alphabetical order; no priorities assigned) _;.ygw cF~;„ « g, - 4 3 > -Ire- (Some location§ may not forspeed humps) x-~- Y qualify ~z 79th Ave. at Ashford St. 87th Ave. between Oak and Locust St. 7 f`v 'i '0.'`4 4F t it W-V 'k - 88th Ave. between Durham Rd and Hamlet St.P r is - { yax N-XR 88th Ave. north off Sattler St. y# 90th Ave. beriveen Greenberg Rd and North Dakota St. -_a Ni Y 92nd Ave. between Durham Rd. and Cook Park T „f 98th Ave. between Sattler St. and Summerfield Dr. ' F 104th Ave. south of Durham Rd. r x ~t f ~E F } 106th Ave. between North Dakota St. and Black Diamond Way $ 4, ° 115th Ave. between Gaarde St. and Former St. q sr ` 116th Ave. between Walnut St. and Katherine St. q ti a.Y e r~ K - r F_ 128th Ave. between Walnut St. and Winterlake Dr. ri? tF 132nd Ave. between Walnut St. and Benchview Terr. } ZN~ 135th Ave. between Walnut and Lauren Ln.x~ r Alderbrook Dr. between Durham Rd. and Sattler St. x r Alderbrook PI. between Alderbrook Dr. and Alderbrook Dr. u ' Ann St. between 121st Ave. and ] 16th Ave. k c t • - Ash Ave. between Frewing Ct. and Fanno Creek a r ,lit a & r tnF ti E 4? a Baylor St. between 69th Ave. and 72nd Ave., x § s°~ 4 14 k _ T " t r Benchview Tern between 132nd Ave. and Bull Mountair, Rd. Cherry Dr.Narns St. west of 72nd Ave. w t~ k Fl~ > Commercial St./98th Ave. between Main and Greenberg F x 4rk st x 1 E~~ y Y° SPEED HUMP REQUESTS Page 1 of2 Znj 'JIN i- ,xi,,rv'-'s-'-: f+-, f. r:. »'`'^'''f^wp'S3nr,i..,~4`:n-, -.,"°r+°,s,-.*a>••;.:~w.'~"--r:~:rm:,°.> -€'c.- - 77 ~k. y... ~'.^''~**'2 0 r xh' °zr 1N'g- s i - t' ,Y p r s ! } - p~ fis, fir a:iv,r-i i -V, _IZ4 51 Y„r°„fr ry ; , ~ kri F ~ - r t r; - ~ 5 r~ f ~,~.RSS,•a y~.. "s c.~. Vff (4 ~`X s§ St--x _ 3 ; --,~'-T a~YT` tea` 48r :3£e,,' 3a - i2'a+.,.'"w w...u._ - s. .-r 1 5 - -`"r` > .~''*s .z~--z.fc. tur•x rte, ~s y. ~.t? - 4,1 iar gm'^+^'*. g.,,i.. rr s tF- -k _ t F 3 } t - -a P} - ."~q 3 ''Z, - 7az&'*~ 4 ,Ingr Ff, NMI- - k 0, A, gffi- OR ' 6,1 r - w{ x r Essex Dr. between Lauren Ln. and Boxelder St. t M` Fanno Creek Dr. behveen Bonita Rd. and Hall Blvd. W 2 t~ - , Grant Ave. between Johnson St. and Walnut Ln. ratsf~° ~r } r 4~~'r'~ s; f a r t Hillshire Dr. between Westridge Terr. and Mistletoe Dr. rr' £ Katherine St. between 121st Ave, and 115th Ave. Poll, r r2'', H k Far.F'Xr.-`ati`3t .may ys Lincoln Ave. between Greenburg Rd and Commercial St.MMf MEL 62 fi't' h .e Locust St. between Greenburg Rd and Hail Blvd mm-=gyp Y~ j ry rt Millen Dr.between 92nd Ave and Copper Creek Dr. - - Mistletoe Dr. between Hillshire Dr. and Benchview Ten•. - - s s Sl ' North Dakota St. between 115th Ave. and 121st Ave. ~s North Dakota St. between 121st Ave. and Springwood Dr.M4 2ci Oak St. between Hall Blvd. and Greenburg Rd Serena Way between Durham Rd. and Grimson Ct. x . , Springwood Dr. between North Dakota St. and Summerlake Dr. Spruce St, between 71st Ave. and 78th Ave. 311 Summercrest Dr. between North Dakota St. and 121 st Ave. x"~ v r Summerfield Dr- between 98th Ave. and Durham Rd. i J Summerlake Dr, south of Scholls Ferry Rd.~ 4.11 t2,~ 1 y f c Tiedeman Ave. between Walnut St. and Tigard St. - :-'Tz Ventura Dr. Ct, between 72nd Ave. and Alfred St. t t Walnut St. between 135th Ave. and 139th Ave.t " '~,a'_i'T Ay, x °A, , k~'A~- rsE'~` -31-~++~'3,~.C.}r~ F l 1 ~r ry rr Winterlake Dr. west of 128th Ave. € r t 1`° t a ~32:h r IIENG'.GMYAISP.RL'\1PS DGC -rte Y ~ F fi f SPEED HUMP REQUESTS IV- Pagel of2 } f 3 MON L n-7 -7-Y Mgv1R"~d c vyK" j Y F •"s Y t ~ ` y {"",'gt r~r fi knv -C'~.hr r-x Ax A 3ayF ys`,e'.~7'yyd w,a x+d, Yh° s s _ 3 - _ r - xa, s f~t~ - P r" -L z 1.4 - 3 °3S-x~`sr"'rT,a~k?~ y q a'rn x $ # , ;AL ~+e tze~'A r y a is r-'= i~vey & . -,r , 4 _ N ~J _ N d'~- :{ys .t,tn:, in•wc, { ys uS . A 4, ~V ~K5, 'Burt. 4-. r6 fs~<'S' 1rv''3 P~ n "+E' a t; 1 ~ 6 _ ,.s' > t p '-5" ' a :T,• X ryye~'' 4. w3 `4 F 1 t i'•P`ir+ r ~ r Ie, ~ y p ~ i4x. XiC`- 1, , r"ny M,~A. 1441 Tr $ +>t 4ti - 'rs 4 t a a - a ri i9`+^rv1r.,.. ak to Y~a•r~ , t e:1 .:f *5 w lY - 1 J, ?f i.. _ ~yx r`Y T A ~r L J N 1 3 E fia yj X- - I °C. F1 E t b' 1 F ¢ CITY OF TIOARD SIDEWALK 2 Pri 61 ® • ,./.lYJE i iiV 0 IUJU, CT ) CITY OF TICARD 6• r -3r t ''-r _ 9 OREGON OREGON -t »E l 69th Ave, (Oak St, to Pacific Hwy 100th Ave. (McDonald St. to Murdock St,) 90th Ave. (Pacific Hwy. to Brookside $t,) 71st Ave. (Oak S4 to Spruce St,) Bonita Rd. (72nd Ave. to Fanno Creek) 95th Ave. (Ash Ave. to Hall Blvd.) 72nd Ave, (Dartmouth St, to Hampton St,) Commercial St, (Ash St, to Hall Blvd.) Commercial St, (N, Dakota St. to Commercial St.) t 72nd Ave. (Pacific Hwy, to Baylor SG) Fanno Creek Trail (N. Dakota St to Tigard St) Fairhaven-Gaarde Trail 72nd Ave. (Ventura St, to Spruce St,) Fanno Creek Trail (Woodard Park to Main St.) Johnson St. (116th Ave. to 121st Ave.) f { r~ k x 78th Ave. (Spruce St to Pfatile St,) Grant Ave. (School St, to Park SW Lincoln Ave. (Greenberg Rd. to Commercial St,) ' ` F 79th Ave, (Bonita Rd. to Durham Rd.) Katherine St, connection to Tiedeman St. Neeve St. (109th Ave. to Pacific Hwy.) . 121st Ave. (Walnut St to Gaerde St) Oak St (90th Ave. to 95th Ave.) N. Dakota St. (90th Ave. to 95th Ave.) i aN Fonner St. (Walnut Ave. to 121st Ave.) Park St (Watkins St to 110th Ave.) Oak 81: (66th Ave, to 71st Ave.) Gaarde St. (110th Ave. to 121st Ave.) Scoffins Rd. (Hall Blvd. to Ash Ave.) Summer Creek Trail (Tiedeman St. to 121st Ave.) f j Locust St. (72nd Ave, to Hall Blvd.) Tiedeman St. (Greenberg Rd, to Tigard St) Tualatin River Trail extension east of Cook Park z Murdock St. (98th Ave. to 103rd Ave.) Watkins Ave. (Walnut St, to Park StJ e ~ N. Dakota St. (Fanno Creek to Tiedeman Rd.) i4 Oak St. (71st Ave. to Hall Blvd.)' 4 ' f$ Pine St. (69th Ave. to 72nd Ave.) 'I I - R - ~,''l3 - f 1 s ' ' Walnut 3t; (Fowler School to 136th Ave.) - s R\Igfo\WV\tld~niksht ~ ~ t ~'t - AnruK 1, IM % yy 9 :I 7 - I ,rr k Y, 5 t ) ' J 5r I L .+kr, t ' d . Ir.v gr• ,sn~' .ii ;a f d- a r. s ` h =.i a. r FZ.. ~;fi ~x: <5 1 , i f . .h• ~5>; .+Y t.+C'h 'T. .P, r i f 3 ,_},y?~ ~„kts iiy,., 4':tt rbt t•' 4' jii "`l •er t J 'k•`' r'' h t. ~,k,r ,yA, •i „a,Y• , y i Ir S,grL+ i a 4 11y -v "0 <5 ~ : •'f4r. ',„'FC vs .nl 5 A' r\ d 1" . c o.,,.T ~l t- ~;~~1' i~ * r~ r h'i t : t' • =5 1, z' . °"i t.y~> °,i°,,va s r• s ti< i~ yA c•x , ~ ~ - r.:., A" n _ .Y „l. n,,y .~e,- '~',e 'f •x. _w5 ='~'nw "i7.4 I,.,,Y - .-.,-:-r'" ,.z,^'•'~ 'r.a x.'~s~'t, ,1;~*.. 5¢d fix' b"~^",'"'~,"S` .s+ ; r 7~' ~ ,-t 1, • .,11 ---.>.--,.:-a,r; 7 I-r: k-t`~.,~"•~'7 .k••:.-r- t ^^r~...l~- im~'~:,~,i.~•yt~"I _~r~i • i... r .t_F 7 E - t I o { .r ' 1 444YYY c r III 7] ~E a'~~. aE 1 rr p Si l}J~~- v.r „ '.Lf ,r(._ , 1 : _ _ ~ ~ ~ . _ _ - . , , ~i ~ .:'ate SI~t ~ rf 'fly L . jC {n { - . - - - - 7 a y. , - - - - - 1 sypy` Y q ~ 4"Vx; I i - , L ~ ~ , I, ~ - - ~ , , - . 9 1. , , : A 06 r ~ i _ "'.{'a2 r aifi n ,_a 7 ~ _ _ 7 i - r .s... -'K- ~ ""4,;, 7 - - _ - - - Rtb".5 Z - - ~T _ , ~ . - k - - ° ° lw wJts"4x,A s.,_~.-.z..... Iz,,,. , __-.z s _ a ...,,.,..a.,~ ,.tee.. .,....r_ >,_3, ,,..y " =37-=I: ,'-;,!:,i,-.",~',r~,~~-~,,,~.--,-4~.,-.'--~~~.~'i ,z - c - \ i '6 < a~ - F z _ - h t , g q, v{ - ' - _ Parks CIP F ° w , y Attached is the initial draft for a plan for the parks component of the city's five-year CIP, g . t ,,'3 which begins 7/96. The plan is an update of the seven-year CIP put together in 1995. ` { The new plan reflects major revisions to revenue estimates and changes in project; . 11 priorities. The revenue revisions include increased park SDC funding generated by a z r new fee structure adopted in February 1996 and a City entitlement of $758,000 in Metro 1'_rv . , Greenspaces bond measure funds. Alist ofGreenspaces-funded projects was adopted by t - Council in April 1996. Among other things, the parks CIP keynotes how Greenspaces links „p . rh the other c--- 9 , ~ „ v.i~Nuncnts of the parks CIP, i';, 11 -~P ` r'} To highlight the proposed changes in project priorities, a copy of the seven-year parks r CIP adopted in 1995 is attached. Among the projects authorized for funding in 1995-96, 'e " y two were completed (the Terrace Trail pathway and the Summerlake Park fencing - ` projects), two were placed on hold (The N. Dakota-Tigard and the Englewood-Fanno 1 x Creek trail connections) and are included as committed projects in the 1996-97 list, and : fi-`Z~ a } i ~ x`~ one was abandoned. The abandoned project was the 74th Avenue natural area park, .7>~. ,4 1, „,~a:.. which was dropped at Council's direction because the purchase price was not within the is , ` ' established budget for the project. 4- Z As for future years, the "new community park" project identified in last year's parks CIP - ; " for funding over multiple years has been deleted. This is because the proposed s~ r ` , ~ a S " I acquisition of a 12-acre parcel on Bull Mountain as part of the Greenspaces program s. t k € a~ { appears to fulfill the need this project was intended to meet. Another change is that the I§ project previously identified as the Woodard-Main park connection has been redefined to -1 include funding solely for land acquisition for this trail segment and for a trail segment ' s .-I x'w along Fanno Creek from Hall Boulevard to Durham Road. This was done to leverage 9 - - `s ~rh r Metro Regional Greenspace funding potentially available for land acquisition within f i these areas. - t ` r - New projects in the proposed plan include the five natural area and trailway land € ~j f f E - WO ( acquisitions funded by Metro Greenspaces pass through funds, the proposed expansion of t Y Cook Park, and new neighborhood parks in the Greenberg and Canterber y areas. As 7 .r z x ' k indicated, the Greenspaces projects were approved by Council in April 1996. The s' a ' Greenberg and Canterberry neighborhood parks were added to provide park services in 1 11-1,1171, , r areas identified as park deficient in the Tigard Park Plan. The Canterberry Park is f ='r proposed to be developed on the five-acre water district property. Land acquisition ` M would be needed to accommodate a park serving the Greenburg area. i I P r- - 1 A major unknown in putting together the parks CIP is the extent, timing, and cost of the } ` Cook Park Expansion, A master plan with cost estimates is scheduled to be completed ,4 i later this year. For present purposes, estimated amounts have been included in the parks r h w CIP to reserve funds for this project. R ` } - -Y ; -1 j t"~ to i t ld`1cip.pks j - y- ~,i- _ 4 - K ,y - 3 _ ji _ 3 ' F W , - s . T `y,3''S ° _YYr M,t'•A'+H l $ C ]E' - - 4 h tw'5 Y t E S-s 1 ~p ~ 4; i m 7 s A f _ - . y k r S', _ 4 's F ' J - - - H, 1', , 3 _ -1 J i f 3 r - s `;t - - - - - ~-_`-j ~ - -1 I 1~ -4, 1- z ~ - ~ : , , _ " " 7 ' ' . - ~~'~Ii , ~ " , ,z ~ ~ , ' ' , , ~ , - a-, 1, z V~~~' h", '1770-~' uS 3 # 5 , c Y 4 ""I'llb z-'- to { > t.- r t it, s," }3 " - { r, f - t Xf R l ~d y;.+ I. z 1S. `sw-. M 'x F.e r , q - Y&„y,, € - - 1 'ti E-£ `Y'^ r "•xc " ,,,y- ' \ d " -I, ti£_ `-=4 11 .ar:3,te»z~. 14 s kT'I7~'^ m"igNN'05 v't 4fl3 r ! - °x' 'F`. {:r` 1, 3 .-nom 3yd° - - rtii~llf.7 l..lr t '4.zw~ '~k. 's .v.,~°`~' a, r Z`abq~',<ir~A`a F.',":,'as; c.`",7'1'=mss",:.€...?W.tvT;..,NJ 6T'*€°5 h *x vs C OR ..NCPAC .S PARK LF,VY ' t r? aFj~' ' ~ f-r A- t df s ip` k 43_"n A Y, - - rz4~°w r £ FY 1996-97 a5 e 'MRS " ,i s N. Dakota/Tigard trail connection 17,000 33,000 f 11 - L - ~ Englewood-Fanno Creek connection 100,000 x `V' { ~ -"g., R'`"' ` ' 16 4}-_x Cook Park expansion 390,000 {a _ r ~ 6 { Fem St.. Greenspace 125,000 'I , IRM WV , 1, 6. ' 'r r r - Cook Park Greenspace 46,000 • s p I z Bond St. Greenspace 118,00() *1._ I 11 _ g Bull Mt Rd Greenspace 293,000 ~ an, N' Fanno Ck trail (land acquisiton) 176,000 200,000 ° a NM ~ G si,•"j 1161.1 k s Y y 4 TOTAL FOR FY 1996-97 758,000 17,000 723,000 r i 1 ~ _ - g, - , f j _ FY 1997-9 rv ! - ' . _ Ash Ave-Fanno Creek path connection 30,000 u > ~ ; ri Cook Park expansion 250,000 r Fanno Creek trail (land acquisition) 200,000 xx -1-1 z4~ t _ t ` ,T TOTAL FOR FY 1997-98 480,000 ; x x I _ a , _ FY 1998-99 11--al- c Englewood Park basketball court 15,000 a~ _ k ,r no Creek ark trail lighting .1 _ ` o f 1- P 40,000 i M2 r. _ ook Park expansion 250,000 g Fanno Creek path construction (Tigard 110,000 ~ ~ :Rte' i " I, - L ~Iv i , St to Fowler School) _s~' TOTAL FOR FY 1998-99 415,000 -M £ 3 t v rs x FY 1999-2000 * O ~f sa Cook Park expansion 250,000 r a . R Fanno Creek path construction (Hall to 100,000 E~ ` x 3 t ry - Bonita) ~ I ` ~ k i r 4 TOTAL FOR FY 1999-2000 350,000 , _ FY 2000-0] 1 ' Cook Park Expansion 250,000 "I i s " Fanno Creek trail construction (Fowler 120,000 . a ~ , ; e= r to Main) " 7 ~ F } _ ,fi; _ J - - nab` i ` y / t Ex TOTAL FOR 2000-01 370,00 s( - {x 4" Q ' M, FY 2001-02 ryJr~_ 11 ~ -Z" 11 ~ = Fanno Creek trail construction 100,000 r, 4 a 7I - S { 6 _j s ` ' irF ~;,f; k Greenberg neigh park (land acq) 120.000 " t ' ~ t , p 1 __7 x i - Canterberry neigh park (imp & land 100,000 k rt w s r x 3: . j-'leisW ad f .1 - rte' t x'`"i`.~.-.y ?~,nur '-x,a rf`k,- t ..„'g e' mr.~_..k: .=.tr:' :;k :r,:-• ';^.°a~.MM y,r yI. ,3: I r *--~s- r t- i '.;t z r-'% ~ '4~,e+:.:.. ✓ rp l d'r,.„1,.t`~v F", '4s". ` j'+C 7 k- s d its ? i J '4 , IM ~ _ . . ~ , . %,'.'r-', :L',_'r_,,_,.~'",~.",_' , , _ , - ~ . I ~ _ ~ , , , , - - A - , , 1~ - - - I—. ' ~ ..v'b , x 4 ^t S j - 5 - f t F `i' - - A , _ AA S Yt-, ~4 t . _ 4 J 'ii` Y - t 2't 7 S J r 5 `i. 4 t i ?.u s r .S' -5 4f- ka ~4- r Y - _ £ 1z .~S #5 ~3-,Y z 1=: - ' ' LI 'z'4 ~ , ~"_"~k~.~'G'_'_`. ~'_"~'I~i ~'~'~`151'~ - - ' ' ' ' ' - , _ r. _ - - - - ' I * I * I ' ,I " _ L , ~ ~ - , ' , P _ 4f tk, ; - J".,, , _ - - - F~ _ J a_. -f -i.._ __i, t . Zp 'T, 's~ 'fi Yx ta`'` t v 7. - tea - •_sz , 5 r AM ZI 15B_ Az, ~h. 't ~r -~~~.r-,* ~ ~x. -4 ~ ~s,~.=c ~._.,.s- - 1•;, i s-. ~ y ~ 4v~q^,y',c~~~~v~" - -~a -s - 7 t A t ~5. PARKS CIP 0.1 I TO PR07ECTS PARK LEVY SDC r ~ s 1 IA FY 1995-96 N 74th Ave. natural area. 9 acres 491.000~~z ' N. DakotwTieard trail connection 17,000 33,000 z s " t~~ z Englewood-Fanno Creek connection 100,000 Terrace Trail pathway ;1,800 10,000 Summerlake Park fencing S- of - 4.000 z.5„triF K.3u,t" c. TOTAL FOR FY 1995-96 58.800 638,000 z T, FY 1996-97 v Woodward-Main park connection, prop. 25=.000 R f Ty t acquisitionlimprov., 14 ac._ i TOT-AL FOR FY 1996-97 235,000 8 ; ts, w 4. FY 1997-95 t Woodard :Main park connection, 14 ac. 120,000 -Fanno Creek path connection 30,000 Ash Ave New community park - identify site/ 6:.000 e}"k' master plan TOTAL FOR FY 1997-98 212,000 ' FY 1995-99 =x 17-r- AK' Englewood Park basketball court 15.000 _t, 'f - Fanno Creek park trail lighting 40,000 ~ k.-{? ~1 9 f' - d tk - New community park - property acquisition 105.000 j~ 7x41 TOTAL FOR FY 1998-99 160,000 }F ; FY 1999-2000 n q New community park - propem' acquisition 131.000 ~ TOTAL FOR FY 1999-2000 %Ml t FY 2000-01~ New community park -property acquisition 100.000 k TOTAL FOR 2000-01 100,000 V * FY 2001-02 N New community ark - property acquisition 102,000 TOTAL FOR 2001_02 102,000 ~z- z 3 1 N, IN- ~4 "s ` CAPITAL IMPROVE.\tE\T PROGFUMA (ADOPTED 6.113.95) ink z' WPM g g: 4~IrV -7 % J r ?a - y YP ( G .,C :r ,l _ f p 1 _ r fy S s f7. R .a~bal r t- `,.^~~T m! 2M ;}a a ti m, y -r , ~ ''~-~~~~t'~Tr_'% "zsg f t`t t,.i ~r ~ _ e_ r i`f ?z~.t~,- }y~Tk•'§~ ~.c -tr~ tom` _ i'" - c r f s-s ^r'.~ r a' j N 5,14 r322 ON 4S L= 4 i 4 S f .R J"F 's5'~R M44 t•^-~--"~> --arn µq.- Via- --~-~T _ A•.,.,`~ _.^_,~rr _-"~"~-~---rYV - , __.1.,.~ 1 g s ,„,yr ~ .w 0 Y N - p,.j.t 3-s"~~ - E. _ ` r s ,L'- a ,ry.3.,. j {sF'fx ~s r§ HR~} scJ Z~~- r{'£ i , ' r 1t - i. ~5 - k'"'aa~' ~ - " , ~~zc`' S _i'a~ _ -,f _s - s .,3.F...i - _a. •'4 r£'nTVv£~w.'" L- } MEMORANDUM z~ W ' ba >A 4 ~ a , CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON"= g 4 L - . ' . ~1- ask p .c.. s . -k y-5 - T x _ }~W t r r., TO: Ed Wegner s~"~ '3 c V°~ Y Bill Monahan et` fi t t ~ , x - FROM: Mike MillG~v( ? _ ,V ~ 4 4-0 X ~5 fz DATE: June 11, 1996 ~ `e r _ SUBJECT: Drainage Problems on Ventura Ct. " 1 1~ 4 I I 1-1 Y -1 - t Vf, , 10 K~ :~t 4 a On Saturday, June 8, 1996 at 9:OOam, I met with the residents of 9860 Ventura Ct. (Mr. and Mrs. 't 1 , , S" a ~ , McLain). Sam Morrison of the City Water Department flooded the street with water from a fire act t x y hydrant to test the new catch basin recently installed in front of 9682 Ventura Ct. This new catch , ' basin was constructed to prevent storm water from leaving the street and flowing through the 9682' z ~~'I ± ° property and onto the 9860 property. The water test showed the new catch basin to be effective, Y r an d none of the,water left the street right of way. , _ _ I { { 1 - ~ R 1 The McLain agreed that under perfect conditions, this would be adequate. However, if any debrisk r " = (like grass clippings) plugs the catch basin grates, then the system doesn't work. The new catch g~. - z k ` basin was constructed with an opening at the curb to allow leaves and grass to go into the storm E drain system. They feel that if more catch basins were installed, that would help in worse case conditions. See the attached map for details.` ; t I indicated that the costs for this additional work is more than maintenance, and probably would be ' - considered under the CIP program. The McLain indicated they would like to see this included as a ~ s~ , ~ c~ A - Capital Improvement Project. ~ ~1, , f A 4 'v,5'd 4y Y ii r}'t£'%x'"" !e 11 X ls. .,t. T-C46 L 2 .l. 4 3 4 i J 4a 1.`~v-.II . , rt ! {'~-'P -t{S 0.k7M,aF f } a ~ 4 ' ~'+L -s -a w -ate st+'- t } U 5 Yl 1g Y:1 A- _ mss. ice' Y r ,a,,r , n. w ° i i 5, £f 'x, v Sk,. x r t~'-n;a,-a ~r'733'-~ j -531 xry ""Mr, r a , t ~,S 5r "521 I r t t ~-a y - - 'r = m ^"n-'n""'- --°W^ww- , -.s,,, y ,~,-r--w..~'m,^ _ , ' - y,fn , 'ti - i - : - t -4 r-' i yJ .mote ~ - ""i , U_ , - _~1~1~ , J_ .w~ M. 3 .'v..' , 3 X S f`j F' s f r r F` ' .7g zK ~0 54, ~ 's -`.s 1- f { rt, S { c, frt'-- y.~r , - 33 1 t ] - s .r t x F - - - - r e[ ,a" a• ~r- k C\r u 1~ F r~ r s ~ - . - - ~ I - T . ~ ~ - . ~ . ~ - ~ , - - ~ - , ~ , - , . - 1~ -11- -.~7-~~ M77, 4~- .2 - h' (c~ - .h ,4~, ?xS"' "it. ..~"a,i ..,.:!.,,..x.i:~.....,a. n.. . . "...._.,.w . _......«x..L..,nw ttn. .I&mm asna,....._......_._ V I f` t 4 z .I . . _ .r ........+~n ] Gd ..A'%. .a A'..1t1 .T a-...•.,,u , i 1 ! r may-. _ I ~3- 4 f Y r 11 a - - I 'Ty, w` p v I , , , ~~.-Z~.- - , j I ",f~ N-a I" ""--7,~,,wl~ " , - . ,V f II- r I W .•'1J ~i.'>l f S0;' S~ S^ J: i Ls if ~z - s-r; N "--j--'-~ 5191 G"ir ~y 0 L54 - 1 „[f I SvSy Ob96 M9b - S£9 ,p 5995 a OL55 ,--r" 9 a _ tlZyi, OZ9E' a 00333 SC59 4 , X -mac - I as Of 9i - ^C, \ ¢ GOl: a., W T". CCC--- _ 51LS• ..J UZLS S: i'Si•tr H ` o- O LS 5L9 > F+OL cI 3 3- ~-z Q cc~O • - yrI- Ob19 S54 I N0596 S£-~ - H # , M U `L _ 4,p* 7 _ ' SL~1Q9 3 OLLS Sn<. I 099E 4 OGOG 6885 089 - ytk-'- .rc•f' i _ Z ..t. .y I ,Q- wN U.8% 5 .:9s~ It Es" , I czk* ~~,t ~y~~ - 4t' ~J 24 3a I 1 - 589 EQ96 0406 i S58t SbBS• I I r-? ~`4 -tifi - ' 9 W ys° to I t r x_ra _ ~ ,,,`~'V-" -_,;k"`~`~",,'47~ WG . s v~~° SE9f 9696 g89e O SSBcp .."3011 1 r _ ~.-W{r t_ I SILE Z19 p5 S~ \ % , Orb' i. tL ' " - _ tom- ?t 11 ch0°' ;21c SL6 c J~b~ S . - kt- f~.:€a y r .7 J3 to 5 ' X - 4 x-~ z S .9y0 ~3. S£LS~ Me GUS I n' SZoS .D . Sb6° ~ I , ~ - f \ . \ 960 ^h r Vf 1•^ ¢ N 0 11 \1 v t9~ q~' C E Z c' c' i e / 5363 Cy yr _ r-I -P, tt r[ Q ' I ` ' K - 1 - c wt 5 i 4 1 ^CL 5;t, O.: ZrOL LbOL , ,t --4s ? 4.'t"_^,.1 a' EE` tr LL SOOLr n' Y G i_ ' 3 - Y) ~.a'~ ` i CL £5 650E r = IS. - OZ:J. ! (r % C30L , t 3 Qt I ZLOL 1-1 +~a 3 k oso oso. v - ~ . ~ -4;~I'L'_~Z~I'~~""~,- c£:.. Lo, ~ SLO.. , ~ 4)1,-3 L 9 11 I I -i 1* I pull I S8J_ j 'I I I 191-1 k 29' ~ Y 3 M ;O ' .c ~,yy 50 t OGIL !51 ' ~1n OL'. I/ to t•J c :1 ~7` 9i i . ItJ I LL r u _ 9 I 5911 I OS:. i I sel 3 r l' S ,i ' - d Y -`aA-%~ ,*.'.z: rc'Jr~;S~•=:.`%~ ls-y= _ - r 3 F.y _ _ e _ i 3' - L - r k ~1 -3 ; - - - i .F, f ^1 r r' - C [a : " ,,,,,,r " ~ I~i~ ~'-l - : ~ : , ~ I - - . 3 _ ~ W- T O e WG~F "`r' 'Y - - = 7 - V.-W-T I x ° I-- 11 I "I 1-1, 11-1-1 2- -g c ti~,j-Pll- r , '.1 . 7i,-IN,W ti, .~~'Ii' f, M~- w - June 6 19 i {I r h' N € , 1- Dear Mayor Nicoli, MW " 7'k ~ f t~' t-s - 5 - t k r - , - t x, % t t W I have been informed that you are deciding whether S f,. x ' r or not to put a street light in on Durham and 79th Ave.. ' ' k ~ { ~tx x % U - r , I would like to express myself concerning this issue. p T This corner is a MAJOR problem for cars and children. Cet - j x W My children attend Durham Elementary School and I ~€s~ ~ Y PirK ',°~A jhy' € will not allow them to walk because of the lack of traffic k' ~ ~ ~~yp .y,~ ~ e' N ~ - ' 4 control at this corner. I do not feel safe. The cars travel s„,y. - `j Ll R ' y~ q g - d 3, i2'3S S.U- Fps. j- 1 ' at a veryfast speed and even when they see my children ~ _ . r s t 6 . n F ,11,1`11- ~ 11.1,4 ~ 11 -M- and I waiting to cross at the crosswalk, they do not slow I - - , t it ?h 4r g down. This is a major safety problem for everyone, a, r- a ~ - iF x ~ A i . IV_ ~ y especially the children. X N ~p 9i s - Y€ r{ .11 ~ i'4 3 jf. fi I feel that this signal light should be fully funded - S r a', A'' k r.x✓`a , P A ? fi ' 4. a r - 53"~i and constructed as soon as Durham Road is completed. 4 E For the sake of the children and their families that live in z~ a, { x r that area, please fund this very important project. T' Y P k' '^P f-- u -y i' ~ ~ _ . - xaa..rxs ..ra J V,5 e ^ - i ' * s` ' S""7'' ' r, i y i 2 ,1 m'~- - - - _ _Ni ,~Z Y :a us- x"7 i - - ~ y -tj -t S P ~t -t _ 9. ' t f t': a r. Mkt --r' ^ i t V T~ - - S= TtT,.+•T~.,~"f.~Y`trrrice". - . . s i ~'x 'r '3';,, "y - ~ I~ iai.k, 1 1 M `1t 1 '{a t sh~ r • I'-: 1 I T-_ ` r.' ,t-. S t,,. _ , :.FS. [ E>a I: i `r` f'1 d r •1:'.:'2`1. t?. r. 1~ F 7 Y 5 f ~;i. r I' - E ~ "Y ;I~, . N .3. ~ ,3r ~ ~ ~ I ,.r. l.I. il' d Fy'- t s - '.r 1~ 3 lci•t.~ ; I.,: ff :1" , of a t ~ J All o`t ~•~,£if r. t 8~' ~ 4 ~ c 7' f"t is e ~ r ~4~ z: rlm,- ~.cp ys ts'~ .fir „ •a y~~ 'Y .•M I ,r~`~ .'R"~{4,«., ,r.r~ bra a 3+~r~•' 'c• K" ~ 'a'~ <:4„ , i•, =a~r k tfi^`<~7aS~r,.~ ,~x~ r? ~ u':q.,'~ -r 4 ,'~'~•~•.'.,{>v`~i<^':, . ~.'y{,,,'•5b Ys y~'F, ~.5~ ,.5y^.5.97 ,E . "'I;, r.~ :..+t t F F:ti ry `ri1'r y~ :4_t, y~r e o . '•5d "f w n,y Sy,W? ,ary,.: Ftar 1k'• •~."'"".-3 • . r.,ny,• Y;a 1 ;;*'tr, awr.rra, M.s, w '~i, m fi6;,'' k".,.-. r"«rr",.`~ t,•,-r.a63„ 4 ,p,' r iti,"•,A v~9,• .FF n1 ~tNMI', M.- a+,. av,,.-, .,.~r._~a,.. sf 2,, -r .a r,£.,• .yam x ~:4~~d° ~i ~id•::4;^~-•-~ ,n•~'.Y ~r.rs ~~F,3 x, .•r . yr a,t. „ - r..w~ ~1 . , f>. - 4~, t. ~„r w+'' t~'t, v. r ~ "s 5•. ;,s, a R..;: , , nsx.,,, y . ..a.. S cos n rt ~r "r., akk .rY,;a^ u" ,~'r. Fn ,~~'~k£', r"~F•~~, r,r° ..a..~ .,f.^..,t, ~,r.~ M4,, a•, qi': -r'~-',. ~ti c n r+?~,c~"a' u a, A;r :+K '-rf ° M ~~«Y~:y. "mac , s, r£t~ ~,'X 'r r ~ y P'.~3`~'r`r'_~•,t .t+..r:zr. 4 ; d ,r"4 'nf >R.<. h „''.x roR. Y.y 9 {,v:w^ h'~r. •'sax --MIT .%3, f . ""•'u,,r -.r#' . ~ ' a'• 'n~"a x ~"e' ~4„ ,,'m' r D'U " .4,:,:.s •••'7= ,1 ?'?5., r•; 7r . ,,,p>~= x" •5-- ~ t w rr~ ~2.q.,.. `£ym ~:a, ems, b `+r5`u„ a• ; I ~~r. , - v rt«. , --•:.a 3"i•M. ~v a, X<+. ;^F ~ . ,Md~. ~ . ~ ' an... , k~~u'v, :.Gir .x r ,cr,'. =•.a, t,r~"~": .r t". :`'w,.. ~>-r~r „ •,.,~k1. , ~5 , c ",`f s"- !u o.5 •L~'~.:. ~ ~ri xs+~-f=-. ..t^,.' r ~ 8., f . "t~' m'k_>{.u •-r . . ,~~n i 7~'" z. n Jk ~ t ,.y~'',r-'~:• C, ,:r ~4tii'','M`. .a' ' . . ~C?'f;: ^ ,r '.w q „ s` , is y g,C. v x x rn a.~,v+.k's<ro-. •-,:^15•~ r ~ N `.4d .i: ``j,"y. rr~%• T,, x ',r:~ "r mi'n u, +~+•I., ..,d;«,. ._ry,, ~'~;;v, ,fit ::.k •3 •7'' W ?ra,, - ~ N'=ivr°' ~ - 'i r.-,. ~..•I ,..,.~"3t .1,E s.r,.. Jam,; ..:.:.Y, ~,1,,.'r :•...,rw,;.,ku'; ~S. Lr• Y_"'u, s r«. rt,•.i 1. 'a'sea ~-Y ,r ,y~ .,,A. . u,. .r.., r' N?ru'F. . "Y,~:>f M y,j`.. .I ~m „ra±'a:; ,4{.. ~ ~„r." r x,b ¢.r.~ h x•r r , ,v, , *.,s 4 °r°~'s-^ , .s r'"~i'z:zt:r^';a1:....d • `:'£=''fir"t•'-::i;`r~a.,r rt ,+rr iC3" m.x. _ '+t. 1 f ,x 'kt5kcd.' +n .t, •A.«i r v",`G`IA.~i'r r.."i'is+.5r'~,+, ``r:'v. .•tiw,." 3m,,rx *S iM'a,?'61rir.,r. r~'~~c "tp 3 F~ r£a¢W.,F f~, , 1yc• L E - < 1. t'+ i+r r '~,,~dk,+s° aXM'r1,r dw cr 9 `w yr~'73'.f Sr'1 F to - 9.k 2 tr; r-- -7 9+Y F ~,d ~~i Bfa):•y#wr':i`Y 7F,£• , c} 1 S tl t r - r',. T ~t „y~"u »~e4`s~ ~ } k 4 ' • S i ` ~ f y , x' 'y S ' o- rri ! e r7~ t r r d rxty t>r, 3C kx i ~ 4 s r ~ f r 7 d a ~ Y 1 °n / 6 ~C.~ o ~✓~ro6 ~ s WON, NF., ~r 11,12 OWN Ms s2~~ Pon 1 a d 1 ' l °)!N r r r r « l ~ , ,:1 t i ~M1 lK r : 't h a ~ I} 9 S a e i k WWI 1-' v k 1 JAM, A t \ s ~ r Mid f p ' ~ Z£tsn 'tx ~4 rYk ~ k t f,, - r, v ~r f VIM ~Yf °J j/v Nt Mon r r k t Y 4 { t t I a'Lai aw d yq _ - 4 ray? IRK- N, 3v' 'N r ° ! 't ' •st t Ar,'fy I t< 4,? A r ~t,a ~,o-3+rv`~&~ ~~r"~drNt'r«•a s `"x r. r t a i, $1 z i tY •r tiro { Y,",~,~,'^t +2~~ r~yry ~'r \ k yt 1i 4 ,y v4 rs~ sF,~ t,,, rwY*C~`~'~t'r~ r a +arv~ $t"r«,yxa u~}>?Kv~3+r rNi. 1 a.,.i'r:,:~,:n e - t S F t~ a 'r r t '~,I S I Ir',R kYcb" r' J"+ t y 7 q t.t xS } c,` ":t s .yy ~g 17 c ~ rr . w;~ W a„ » ;:ter',: +lt'+ r ' ri;'; • ate Y 't kr ,ti. x*"' v-a ..•r .,g.`'~,",^n- 6v,. ~y we'S3,- 5 s-a'-,. r-a r< .iw2'.n3,: +,y, ',4 <rP> t,, t•.r•x ar''e. s„<:i :~;i;r., L ,a.,, a;T`=4 e•w.r .~rf'Y..a,~x''9~i.. u~. , -kd16 ~r ;i+• ~ o' "Lk b:C4r ;;;r':' t C? f „U A W n ! r~i '~.:£i' ti'• . 'iS' ,J \ 3' ' ..F, E`n"t,~"^nel ° "v-, 'SiT2 ~>:5~i,' s••.. '"'~::e ,:i,.k~ a:•r~i.,- t., t :a.>',az- 'art,^, -r'"E. .M=.sr'^ wr~,... <o crb, ,•c a, te`a', ~ >Nu•'M1 ,d FSs .i6rC,• c:4 9. .+±lH, . K , i' d •YCa-t,-: •"+a,. ;3cr' v, u.ti !p„ +,I,E~»' -.'aS", .t l.. .d'~; ..r'~!'-. ' ua~n rr+r i" ~'.+I '~X~,'"°''f 4 4 6 . 5n.., t7r ,Y:+»`~+` " ,a e .r~'_•' d:: wse- „ Gi ~'Y" n I n. a x.ar.r4+'",o-~J F 4 w..• ~ y,•3r~ ,,w,yN;f4''r` „s<.,_ M='"' .",a, E, •^nn.~`Y , , a^" " ;r v Zr, ° } K y.` t " - b Y S`4 °-'t . 1' „ a t x t +aPS -w.'9 tY4v,;-' - h*`tt ,.ola«,. ,•w. t"r ,FrS , fib., w, ~:.,^:r^t,, ~9 .t,. r,. .,<a °'ra` :1, r'-T yr'r'1: .,^~r: w1r ^'.,t "k• ,•-c. r r^W~~r~ w^ w k •^e A . `N„r ¢ , u;« ~n - d'.v , v: - i :,trY. , z- ah,,. 4~ e. .J'ro4 .,h. ;i, ^s'•,9 • la , 3 { v,.tym - ,E ~ ,a 4.r.T ~ 5 . > - -zl e ^r ~ .C.~~.. :.3µ„r s ~y s ~aaa .'v. a r E , ,s+, .,}•.3,, ,,e., ka_. r u .Y'; Y.° ,_~~-"~z?`-'gc :.n-'az d .:ks• x'4+. :i°v :'Y„1a1 -M g.,•. 4.s'.,-, nx. +v G. e~,. . 3- fa Sr ^:'L'rv tY~~•~r9 .fir 49 '%G .y- ",i. .d L v+. y+'t.... ^d-.=, aPr * 1 r. , P, rr: ~,M ,s7c 1- .t4'w .'nJ~^~+' '"ri?":,St <,-sX+'. s ~5. Sa sr,r .f. p ..3 ~ i ~ -'7a`•", ?.i>•:.,ra„ ,'rm,,,,"•:,.< ,x~<'s:a:. ~ ~ ~ :r, •3 ,fi ."sue ~a _ irs"~" n" r3E ua «~>4•- ,.r "a.JNEW. z ' e~`^ a ' k1 r 5, 1•.~+yau '0.~ k, .o-. :,'`'+aerr,.E' ,rJ , s} t, M ON " .1J",",f %:s'• . . t.an~'^'~2 da~:.,ti;; dU r t,,. ^ ,r.:tns + t5a?' ~ - ~ ,A-~~". '~„Y~ ,r+r-}Sc *.xrr ,s,?r.. ^+,`i", ar~s:a -R.u„ .-5, .`r,t'>, '•Ga`.x, ? ,S.k ,n :r'•''I:r ,,N ~a" =n'~„ ..~rw:a,. . ~r,s, ~ ~'~:."r1 , ak t", „"~~';t;;`5::~'~ 'st ..Le't':#$% = MOO,!" asR -u•, .2-r'd» •r~ m` ~ - rl x`•.~. •.Ar~`&'r' t. .~,cZ:r 4R . aG S `-{"r; - `q.,~„;•, *S'~ f"""via- ~ 75r'.»"~.t. .ir~.__ t,r~. ,3, ,..i'„r. t 3,r~ .5,r•, rv "#4~Ft- '.'z~:r,; ;r?,. F:, m+r .,'~r ~M a`cttt. , 1...-._ Y.6"`,• ~u` :r~„, ~ . ar t rx .,0+'4,,. „ *t s+ra*~.. r:, a •h •N t:,~ Y S.e (`••.."b . ..+J ,fv a: 1r- ' ry?. s F"' YS. Sh' a"X4~ F. r-'t"4' :vYStY- .y .t x):•. `.;5.. a.:fi•i"':r ~ 'ti, ..~x ~.sX„_,5 ~';r~,~.^,,::.n.4 ..,,~v"r~-,•;;~ „v"',,, a ;3x-ERs:~::.a.. , rt~~~,~„`,. t:t'3 r~'« r• • g,.~",,. Q ' +fi'u ° 3 ,,?}''z>r - i , +A •1 , w « h',. , v.„',. . w, ;4::,• :43 r*> . .x >vy; t „ E >P „ ,t' " k': d 1 't ^.k ,C r, .h aY,., ,au, ~ >T ry~,`67, Ds m: ~,~k" k "~.tx.& rw.'•`°d h., ',~~.,J:aES'r ~t sS,.~• ~`,x,_a, r3 F@ i;.-~ •;,,.7 .'~'1,, v~a+„`Y. _',5^.,~.,.F'r'3. :s• r . +*ak .t- ,•.X""'~, ,r ~t'< ,fir .w•' `T'^ ,rv45•~ ~ v.lk`' .d£a 'x,.- - ~ ~r`t,~`` t ~',.*5§~J: ,4. Y, _ S.. Y W ^ . .ro ,r,^ .,aM. ".^+,n M n R'+g „'t, iti xr .«T •s.;*;.,: ~ ~ d' a. 4 , . ~ ?nm ` i;&. '.k .IS w "v." ¢r`, Ya r, '1 r. } r..,r,s r' ~•r. ~r b`~`."~. ~•.c•'tr..,~F ,.r~~r~:.>:~~,~r~§ •~'k.r~t. .,a.*~ 9 t , ~+''ei, '41i.. F ri;•^.. ;~.7«. 'r.... . ir. a,•.a t'Y e ce'"`e, b a.'~ ;`-N''f ~Hfi , • . A ` = 7? r 4¢ -k: - •3~V 7"itar: ,r ,s t'x r,s.- a • ."fu r°i o- . b _ `"~~rea" x . ,:3".u -~.p,,. .1 ` a - A .h^ ti x+ . ' ,r.s~ sr" .t .4r t° a ~ . a '4!:S "Y'd . . 'R •n s-1 +i3'"5 nit-.r .F}'~.~ .~~Y ,v, § ~w 'Y,t n~.~f <.9 „R `Y v a .a, AL- _:,7, `tL,r.,. :"sr~'v2 ,.e,w:-;,,.... :•'S',Rx.-<s ..:,aw•-'9'n~ <~a'r'~:4.e.,-_ .,,x .,tJ;'k.:r~iN.,., c•h;,?~.'h. _„-.^s4r•'+..,,,;.s ars ~,•4:_ ,,.<.*u r..rr;Ut l~s'Yd, .z*"~, ..a:nJ. 1> .tt":~.•"~i'~, `:,r R.1=. aL?~ r1Y.e.2za,*ik~°='~.,»,.-.~5~~`^.4~.:.8~.m,~~d,~,ass:;e v?•.,• -t.._ 1010 _,p 4 - : ' - - - - . . 5 r_ wars - z. - H- - . - 'c ' k ~ „1k b -+k -yam _ _ _ s - - - m' z`YP...tt ~E e'r'r - r - - i c:. ,T tr~7 4.- fi r ~ , , tax- -r~wjF - , - - as3 kr, at k'fX dot S - 'L Mi - ~rsx - 5 £ } _ { + - - i1 j, 4.t 'ice' s a - - is ~rar, . ' t "UAW A - -r - - S ' 'U ~t S•r-SS.°g1 %rt sa -1 'R.s .qua, ` ~ ~~may ! t~ $ ~ Cg' $ . I% I r , ~ 'f..5s `r` }z i _ - <;:; - ~ # t E a -;F t v~ : l MEMORANDUM (p : Agenda Item No.-, -1 t F CITY OF TIGARD Meeting of If q(o ~R~ . 4 ;i TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council v' _1111~ § i , FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder { y I , .-.y i DATE: June 4, 1996 11 A ~~~a SUBJECT: Council Item No. 6 - June 11, 1996 " - 14 0 i s -s , s - Planning Commission met on June 3, 1996, on the Capital Improvement Project priority ~ ~y % list. Staff will prepare information based on the Planning Commission's e ~i R m recommendation for Council's review at their June 11, 1996 meeting. This report will be , 7 11 f (~,a submitted later this week to the Cifi Councii. r f^ S - ; a 3 ~.n, i 'ph`i CN I 1 F i t f q# L a.- _ Y 4, ,fir - - r ~F 't " . P yc i ~ a s- a te tai r ~ , F I %6Ff f Z ~ pl- H} N g~' - u4 t k F i1sk rp Y7 G f wfiJi f t t" f a- ~ s p ,1,)~,~,~'~~;'~~,z".-Z",~"'~~',-,',"~~r',~~-~",~'4-'~. im - , - x: M `his Nq x- b - k - ° tom? ' t ? r'3'N '~f 1i" ~ ? , - 1 r i. - r s,-t.y,...,,., r a ,kk t 1 E2ir ~"°Y'~ i.....~C''^'^.~~_yc. _ , __i~ I E?~. , N^ __'a'_.'_~-r-+~r ~T rv i ~ .Y~_~ .z ,.r .ct xt 3 - - - .9 5 eF _ 5S~`^5 ti m34~ - _ F , S _ - ~ - J.' - - - - i 3 _ J _ _ ~'f r.- :-.-++w+'.r+'.3,a;.+..:H'1-d.2.;.,...- ._.._:.,,.....,.-:.....c.,,.... 1-1 .a ..,_....+.,...........v..~.,.,.,,s,...,....._.-2, . ~..x ° °f ? } '3 - 1% fa Y Vfi - AGENDA ITEM # T 1' For Agenda of dune 11. 1996 . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON , , r COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY - ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Ordinance Amendment _ { - R / A B CO \Ct~X - , m PREPARED BY: lyels Mickaelson DEPT HEAD OK f 1~/1CITY ADMIN OK b4' " o t ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCI r ~ ' x Should the City Council approve a comprehensive plan amendment and zone ordinance amendment to f a li allow 100% residential density transfer from wetlands on land zoned R-12, R-23 and R-4o t - r z l . ~ , STAFF RECOMMENDATION - '"'Ir, , 9,04-1,~ - :1~1"11~1 I ' The Planning Commission recommended denial of this amendment at its hearing of May 20, 1996 as ~ proposed(6-1 vote). Staff finds that the proposal does not satisfy all relevant comprehensive plan Y t criteria and recommends that the City Council deny CPA 96-0003/ZOA 96-0004 as proposed. Staff and - Planning Commission recommend that City Council approve a modified version of this proposal which .,,z r would allow a 25% residential density transfer on sites with wetlands to the buildable portion of the site on all lands zoned residential. Additionally, it is recommended that staff return on June 25 with an " ~ . r _ ordinance and findings implementing the modified proposal for adoption by the City Council. ~~v ~N,3P , w ' A -iv INFORMATION SUMMAR+ - s ~ _ This application is submitted by ABECO Corporation which owns a site located on S.W. Lon staff r TN' F Street adjacent to and south of Highway 217. The application is represented by William C. Cox, I. ' , ~5 s''~~ x [ Attorney at Law. The proposed legislative amendment would modify the housing section of the _ ,r".r ar t ~ 4. comprehensive plan to allow 100 transfer of density from sites with wetlands which are zoned R-12, R- ND t t ' 25, and R-40 from the wetland area to the buildable portion of the site. The application also proposes . '-1, k t - 7 an amendment to Tigard Community Development Code 18.92.020 to include wetlands in the list of ° ' r, ~ t sensitive lands from which density can be transferred, and 18.92.030 to allow 100 percent density " - transfer from wetland areas zoned R-12, R-25, and R-40. The applicant's justification for this , . -V T w # L comprehensive plan amendment is attached, and is summarized as "an opportunity to update Tigard's plan to assure that it has done what is can to accommodate increase population growth in the region or 11 a correction of an oversight in the existing plan which works counter to Tigard's ability to comply with provisions of Statewide Goals 10 and 14" (see attached.)?' - r - The modified proposal recommended by staff and Planning Commission would modify the housing T' section of the comprehensive plan and community development code to include wetlands in the list of , r lands from which 25% of the residential density can be transferred. This modified proposal would apply a - to all land zoned residential. M 4 z j{(r ~r x , , - v ..~..~..^T + - --K- I' t, E + - YY. d u s. i l° I N k MI _ - _ - _ _ .i - - - - - _ - . - - - - - - . . . L~ - , - - ~ Y i1 _ v 1 - h -a i__, _._.ix. , n, a a~~r O z ',2i - _ t _ a t~ r, , kS sI _ _ i x~-Pewz~ 3.`~x, _ ^'Y ~k - o-i - ~r x -,F`5 c .4- c q`-; E a Y s r # t - l I'll F e . t x- x+ `'s, xj ~-y ! - n f~ v s t~ 4 - ~ ~ c ~ " r.. s£~.- ice s a - .•'i,~,~ T" - -:cam.. - + r- `4',Yt - s " ,y :K'"'"r _.!h -"i,.' or r r 8. z-7iz""pir'a -11 -.f - Sn 4 t r P - ,i} ;11, 11 { ~ x. a~ . .SFk.uw " ,...~~:;'t2! au.zti}"':-} :4vuhaz$`.s v <-"_'`~'..,y,., . •.a'a r..S.m - - - t yT ~e~~ A ya - 'mo' b. qt 't.3 - ~k. ; ,,s ' r,~1,t 1 M 'S~;v 4 a ~ .,F x .r y ,,1-:1 ' t -r n - -a:° s:y_ i -0 i ` t , 11 -1 r OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSinFRFn 4 - IT 1. I ,'s ~ 7- 1. Approve the proposal and direct staff to return on June 25 with the ordinance and findin s for 5a~ e~ - 11 £ . O ; adoption by the council. 9 , y ~ "'Q1 tYW" ~ G 4'2 4..Y' t - f t"•r ryxd - p -1 I ,4 L ~f h 2. Deny the proposal and staffs modified proposal and return on June 25 with the resolution for denial j ~ 4, h~ by the council. ;4 9 15" , r FISCAL NOTES t ' 't,"~ = r = ` No direct fiscal impact to the city. ~ ~ ~ n . 11 - ST A y~ 3' x g'r A a s 'G 4'"rd P $ 0' 1.11-m-1- i2IY~ -Ili , ' fit- x F - T,, - IM§Mw*- - * ,a' ~ r.. r , ~r'tS v 'a c. t F f ` 11 4 _ J' - i v. P J a l - I 7i 5>+Y` yes,: 1 ? - l . M1 .t It ~ r ,RV ~ f nj1- Br a - x S R{'' ~ P w"+€ ` 3P ~1t .+t - , ,-j~ [ _ %,-O ` E sz~~~aa. '3'ti~- a~d• IF 5 S x a} 3 - S' p't{F.i i 10 h ~ K. r ~ , 1 YJ' ~ tt'' ~.5 - x mss` ~ ! . ` , i i'zk a - .5 S'Y 1 1 1 3''i. t'A'4[K.5,'.f'4'LW.Y rc'«Se.n°MZ: YY u•22 y.'.dR'O'V."^"dW+ssm`Y'w z.'w+wr -a -w.rwr.m.~....a..,i.mw.au .T,..a _ . ?-s'£Y i .a a r FF 4 - j qq_ s _ f- - z r i 2 r v it£ s T '-c'~~ s~, x''' -'k E 't> s a _ r - r - r 5.4 " 5 'fis;T K` 4 y, ~'f'',q y?,°s c ,4 n - 3,~ 3 =,c fit` ' »<a . ..ti..JJyyzzd`` q N" t l _ - ,5 - rum l , , } t a, 'x G k as .`t 7 t - F r,s j - 1 _ y- L i 2 d ~h~yI.v}r xk f S 1 R-~ } 3 k 9~,~- k3 e r 1 - - h tar -.--T'----•-.__.r-~~_.-fir ~~~-t~~^i_~'. ila1'`•t.-~.~ - .max....-al t' TIC J, 4 Jgg, t x< ro ,z 3r' s ~~..a'f- `tom cam`` Yt' s~LY MUM '~rs, Vi het f s ar§s y y ~S °T~ a ;Mp, 9 'Tom` o- rN at y~ h Ee M No 07; LEI zf'Illllam C. Cox auomey at law SG„y,kk Land Use and Development Consultation A15 Mo ~e!MO 21 - s Project Management Wg 09=0 70 ~0 3h.. t a CITY OF TIGARD ~xst a~ Y n COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT REQUEST { 1 4 J~ CHANGE OF WETLAND DENSITY TRANSFER LIMITATIONS Mr W - ~tew`+ - , t<~.s'~ra .ter t "~;a 1 ¢ r5`,u . 101, er GENERAL INFORMATION n : a c Property Address: 1S1 35AC, Tax Lots 100, 4600, 4700 ~tw S.W. Longstaff Street adjacent to and South a x v uzw~ ru yYi of Highway 217 its" ~'",4 s r e ty x~ Property size: Approximately 3.5 acres s Property owners: ABECO Corporation-Contract Purchaser= t + r'~ tu€ Tax Lot 100...Brock and Margaret Dixon 19, - gjc Tax Lots 4600 and 4700...Phylis Hresty£ a SL f f e z~ Applicant: ABECO Corporation k- 6205 S.W. Carman Dr. qt r Town I Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 az1 (503) 699-1771 r T Representative: William C. Cox, Attorney at Law x~ Y 4 0244 S.W. California Street t . 1 r - $ max' r~ Portland, Oregon 97219 530 asA s (503) 246-5499 t Y I PROPOSAL SUMMARY IM PROPOSAL The applicant and applicant's representative, with authority r~ 2 x from property deed holders, requests an amendment to the text ofzW x f ! Comprehensive Plan Housing Policy 6.1.1, Implementation Strategy ~4 r 3, and related provisions which limit density transfers from Mo. 1 ss, tP physical constraint areas to "no more than 25%". The ABECO site r-tTy _G i contains a wetland which is not specificdTly mentioned in theMUM m tt Comprehensive Plan or implementation strategy as being subject to f the policy. Land use regulations add the term drainageway to the P.4 mow, ¢ ZMMN * m list of physical characteristics governed by the 25% density £ _ 'a a r•r X s~a`~ 1 A A; 4 transfer limitation but the wetland on the ABECO site is neither £k?° j a drainageway nor a floodway or floodplain.~`' x 0-7 i, Mm, wV Q1, 3 E. low 1 s a r Ml+~k Wit, f f j 0244 S.W. California Street • Portland, Oregon 97219 • (503) 2464499 • FAX (503) 2444750 + -o } f jig Sr s. zealot ~'r~~s, a +s fit' - MN ~7r comas& 5'tS` ,...:^•a- .rf" f _ _ _ r- 3 t - ' apt - 4 a't ,tad't.. _ APA F.a= Rr r r _K- MASS? 1% A KOM. Le.s~'h frv5'Y '`1 f - f_,,, - tlEor'3'-xuk-'KR~'r t TM'*. Y. fi '9A x 1 f P} i 3 1 f { SY i l b 35 aNot fit z - 1 t ~Ya _kF_M _ ~y"-„"C° "-ra a , ~,r s 's, a { .w✓' l t { _ A t16g V1111 04- V K . toll- R", = x 0. _ _ 7 t ~ , , - - - - : - , : : ~ 1 ~ , 'I, 7 , , - ~ - ~ , , , ~T','~-,~,:,~ -'ft,-~'~~ 4 ~7- , !L, , . y e>. - - r _ _ acs h f Y r-, } ,k~ fir"` r r * r r _ }t _ t ;'-~Fe F k t a rs - 4 - - _ - - _ x v { r`, g am } s"rV t~ > - j ~....~sx .a, '...ryw*a.»:r E , , - --R-- `,O P,~~~-'--', - q:~,~o'j-!*Z~4~~, n n According to Tigard Community Development staff this a a~3 t 3 Comprehensive Plan amendment is necessary even though Policy +s~ 6.1.1 does not specifically name wetlands as being subject to the "°1# f--=,5-'' density transfer limitation. Applicant requests that the 25~ g-- limitation be removed and 1008 density transfers be allowed for F< ~ Z' W 's i v r wetland areas. In addition to the Comprehensive Plan amendment, 1 - *:;I, -.r applicant's request will necessitate the amendment of Community _.~~,i ,4 ,R" t,a:o Development Code (CDC) section 18.92.020(A)(1) as implemented by sz " a a Q CDC 18.92.030 which, according to Tigard planning staff, ~M,: r.~V t presently limits density transfers to 25g of the total number of ~ jz wr5,'4-& units which could have been constructed on the wetland portion of~ y the ABECO Corporation site. ' ts, T Z 1-1 c ``„i$~=,i Fit t 2,F CDC 18.92.030 presently states in pertinent part: ~ z ~sz~~ 1 G A. "Units per acre calculated by subtracting land areas ~ ~ 4 Y listed in Subsection 18.92. 020 (A) (1) from the groan ' ~t ? y acres may be transferred to the remaining buildable M "Y land areas subject to the following limitations: s1 p, r _ , I fW6-- i' 1. The number of units which can be transferred is c or limited to the number of units which would have s < been allowed on 25 ercent of the unbuildable area~~n -Z Y, if not for these regulations; ate{ u'f t , ~ ~ M, a I 11'a ~ fib; t 2. The number of units is limited to 25 percent of :sS' 3w INS 4Y - the total number of units which could have been 5 :~~z f 3` 4 constructed on the unbuildable area if not for e ~ l - r-- y these regulations; and t1 , f r`lx fF-- ;I L. v 3. The total number of units per site does not exceed , e 125 percent of the maximum number of units per ~ ~4t gross acre permitted for the applicable ; `'s ,t w Pa h comprehensive plan designation." "~l 1 t =.,fYS s B. "All density transfer development proposals shall 3 a comply with the development standards of the applicable < F underlying zoning district unless developed under the ;>:~et provisions of Chapter 18.80, Planned Development. (Ord. r 89-06 Ord. 83-52)" , ' r ' - . J, r APPROVAL CRITERIA y-'F ~`e" s - yi ~ STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES g- J I . C 1' h yj f ,k t ri'-P 4 State law requires that local land use plans be consistent, "t L_k with the Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines. City of Tigard k has determined that the statewide planning goals and guidelines ~ X ~ - A ` Y xak r r x { -art r - ~ ~ 11 I'll ' k{'i .3 r k r a Y a a~ r } b I- Ngr .:,r,tv-, Aae..war x;;" 'cs..:, S: Z:^-' a. ;rkv -t-' ";:z "nts _ ~ -~'»x"~ i _.,...,,¢`"-Hi *t' } .a. 4 vj?.a,'+ 1ty . ,..-rk-p+°s3 ti9 Y. S e' n ~g + t 2-- i - - - fi -,~k } -j J ;z 4 f F IL , ~ n:, ~ , Z, , - - - , a "Y & l' Y s{ t s x `f t A + - - , Y j' A f ( -g t c,, } - h Flt r.C,i` } _ t t - N q - r - t -li - a. f lk k' M1 M $ • 4 i 'n 'gkrt i r T f- wr 1 it } _ _ e ✓`1 r c ~,-,~,,'v' ~ - ~ W~ , I , , I . ~ , L I , ,,!'L",~,-"",- , ~ , , i~~ ` - ~ .11 ` ) ' '_a, _ -f - L- _ _e..,_ n-_ . . I ~ I T-~ . - _ - _ c Nam z , h' S'4A. <u G , yf P' 3 - Y i- ` 5 Ff 1 fi i # T ~r S S - z v, - r> ' xa- , x x' t ° ° ,3`,-.S S~„'~.,-3 i -._~~t„.~ tcr>.F:.a~....~a.,...c.a:.-sY..~.:.:~'.'.s,.f~:r:., .t.i .°-:~3.«."s.-..st_-' 7 3 f t x-r`'s .~i;tit+~ - - p - - i, } g-^~} q€- t i F3 Jet--'s , ~k - t s 1_ -T Y - .f 5 { fix r, -,y--, ~j - x~x~~ ~ - ~ ~5 numbers 1 through and including 14 are relevant to a .4. . Comprehensive Plan textual amendment request. Those goals are f'; hoc"„ ~r 3- addressed as follows: ; cx y r v, 's dto i:, ) _.n ? pyy; a 4_ tt~9 GO$1 #1 4 '_1't r t e ,f , f "To develop a citizen involvement program that insures ; the opportunity for citizens to be involved in ally ` tf phases of the planning process."Ff v 5} F.i t-''- ,'i4''ss{~ 1~ ;mot n, Fl The proposed comprehensive plan text change will not alter k`', '~_s; : _ °e iy the existing notice or appearance standards in the existing E ' ;-l,'` € , g p E ti 7 4 Ti and Com rehensive Plan. Those standards have been reviewed and 1 x 4 4 K 2 Y'* F . F acknowledged by the LCDC as being in compliance with this? goal, s , } -ti -fi ~ Goal #2 , c s a "To estabZiah a land use planning process and policy~j n framework as a basis for all decisions and actions Esc z " related to use of lead and to assure as adequate " }e' n Y n , factual base for such decisions and actions. ,.4` " R _ 4i C.# S.Y` Ts¢ , X45 iS~' ~ _,1 J - .f. X X X X X +-r i.,>- ~5. t ~'s'5 } { . ; . tea.. ^t~'~~g~ , r i "All land use plans and implementation ordinances shall ' a h " L 4 be adopted by the governing body after public hearing _.„N»~ a~-_ ~ and shall be reviewed and, as needed, revised oa a TfY ae~ periodic cycle to take into account changing public _`-F y ' policies and circumstances, in accord with a schedule net forth in the plan. Opportunities shall be provided for review and comment by citizens and affected , ~ rNj"F, governmental units during preparation, review and k ~ ~ I F„ revision of plans and implementation ordinances." -'y', ~ T - t1.~,- two E The subject comprehensive text and ordinance amendment is s°~~r ka~~ , ~x -J {4k 1 q F- "MR f being processed in the spirit of this goal. As the need to ~'p f'z ;fly I ~ y ~ ll e r increase residential densities within the Portland Metropolitan r 3 Fr Area Urban Growth Boundary becomes more acute it is logical and 'sue ~.-Iy!-4 ~ . - responsive to change to seek ways to remove unnecessary obstacles fi f3 t 7{~Y - to achieving that higher density, This modest request will work f --f ~ i t sw z - t,w _ - - z 1- z4 - c~ j. S s # F i ~e m , s ' i - rs a 'fir F{.. 7 -f -`£n~.s., & n vrf F."-". -ri .,r" :m-a, - r,it., - %1 i-FR fi,W ~3 --l.:+::i9*-^ p+ rt ?w Y,'~ 3 4' xs - _ - --r- E s i n g,s 4 t r - z t rr,~ y r - e z 4'~ T f 7 r i +J i_ f ,fig ,s.k t 1 IP - i Y E ? _ 4 _ fc1 , r 1 - - F r i f i F, 'J !H Y t _f~~.t.-..1..,_~._.. ~___~~.0.~ . ~--^h+~-"1R"'~_r....-..R T'~wl rf"T'"f~'~'y _ ~.,-.u"~. _ _.-1.u:_ t~; i4... ~i._,. at tam to ~x'~~" as r x a - - x, kr~... _ - - - _ - ~ - e~.. 4nr. A 2 IP t' S , ~yyz S r4.3 n P t"P 'J, tJ(~ ffx3 to encourage the preservation of wetland areas by removing the rg}, negative value impacts associated with the loss of 75$ of the ,tip^t z'. density allocated to the wetland area. By allowing 100$ density c k i~ Jdk ,w k i'C-~ - , - transfer to land adjacent to the wetland area the goals ofa x~r s W Fa x f x increased density and resource preservation can better be 4x accommodated at less of a negative impact to a land owner's"' ''3 r property value. x , Goal #3 "To preserve and maintain agricultural lands". Comment: This goal is not involved in this textual change 't~~ OWNS application since the lands which will be impacted will have sEs t a WN~ already been zoned for residential development. To the extent 4r ' <l_ - 9- ~T that any agriculture land would become involved it would be in the future when a zone change or other land use decision is made. At that time the Comprehensive Plan map and text changes would address agricultural land. a Goal #4-~~ "To conserve forest lands by maintaining the forest z "p r land base and to protect the state's forest economy by> r making possible economically efficient forest practices s that assure the continuous growing and harvesting of t M Ff forest tree species as the leading use of forest land ~rs a x consistent with sound management of soil, air, water,} and fish and wildlife resources and to provide for ~f~; 'x recreational opportunities and agriculture." 4L .I r 1 21 f q Comment: This goal is not involved in this textual change , 4 f t~ { t A "'4. 5 s application since the lands which will be impacted will have a ze-- # already been zoned for residential development. To the extent t that any forest land would become involved it would be in the -If~ -Kr future when a zone change or other land use decision is made. At ` tom, M1 M ; 2 i 1 'q' Y~2r 50" 1 j r a A J'rai'4riLTY'.-•3. _ ~3^i^L .:Mkt",i`t J: Y° •a, C' - -2 { 'rte, d+ r 3 z F Y f 4 - vt- Yg~ ! l SP 2-- - e T. -xv ? a" "1 0 a3£ fi'+ -,u~ 44 Y - .C ! - .rte Fa,S~v,2.tt.~'t z- LM, a4z that time the Comprehensive Plan map and text changes would a address forest lands. s• r s~3 1 u Goal #S "To conserve open space and protect natural and scenic s s~ ~r5r ' resources." _ a Comment: The subject comprehensive text and ordinance amendment * thw, # ~~1r XN - #e & w - is being processed in the spirit and purpose of this goal. As the s ty_ ? 4 need to increase residential densities within the Portland O~ = Metropolitan Area Urban Growth Boundary becomes more acute it is logical and responsive to change to seek ways to remove ro unnecessary obstacles to achieving that higher density. This modest request will work to encourage the preservation of wetland r% r"4ry; ( t areas by removing the negative value impacts associated with the f > a loss of 750 of the density allocated to the wetland area. By7 allowing 10016 density transfer to land adjacent to the wetland ` Mn; r i- area the goals of increased density and resource preservation can better be accommodated at less of a negative impact to the land s owner's property value. # r Goal #6 r "To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water uad a and land resources of the state." ' w Comment: y D lr y fri { This request is consistent with the intent and spirit of x this goal. The very concept of compact urban areas and controlled " urban growth which are the keystones of the Urban Growth Boundary x' ,f concept is to contain growth so as to better utilize existingf ' r s :ham k i y r Y infrastructure and reduce auto omissions. By allowing the r s~ E , - _ ~.7~`' -te, i'2'~-- *n1~~i'xu'rrt~ - .P ~so,a~ .,.,~e~,.,~i,.4t a ~ ,r •~',;k, Y rt r r _...._.~a• _ r ..~.r_. .....i~~ ...i J . _ti _ -ut_t t __...r r _~....i _ ~ J.r:.•. mac.. ~ .cW _ ~ .T TM._1'.v v. ~~f , .-W! V , - ~ " . , , ~ , - " " - , ~.~Z ~ , ~ - ~ - - , - J- - , 2~ " U ~ - - c. rs - 171 saws. T„,-a s - a - s..,. s - .e.. % 41, ~'^4a`atr z~` _ W - j e q - r tea ~Iv M M, :E tx n , z 'I M d ?'x - - ' w p - ,t ' ae ar yre! r x 113 r -1Z y-y;, li r - ' - r, , ` , 762i 11," ,i -4 •.~YF l,11_' _ _ F`%~' 'r td-'v1:ni ti~ .'~4rY `,[3 r. , . -LL k transfer of 100 density onto housing resource land from wetland Cg F- ` areas the theory of this goal is accommodated while being . fin a h a cq ",`-t rt - - `s,-nY sensitive to what may otherwise be considered conflicting plan rt provisions, i.e. unnecessary loss of density due to limited°?is ` r3, -t Y , ~ € transferability from wetlands. _ a }f - . [ a~x Goal #7 . 3 tZ, ~Z I '_;~4 :yea„,; : _ ' ~'1', 11"To protect life and property from natural disasters ~ , k :f, {and hazards." ` " s eZ C:uuuenc: This goal addresses the need to subject development toy Y~' s appropriate safeguards. It warns against locating development in ~ 5~ 3 K areas of natural disasters and hazards without appropriate PUS };i- safeguards. This goal is not directly applicable to this request. k - a'~'3.N'~x r 1. , - r,: Tigard Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations already ! r ye, , i, - -f - - - control lands subject to natural hazards such as steep slopes and ` il_ . t - , w _ - a z ga_s " floodplains. The proposed text change will not alter those ,4, - ? q r safeguards. The text change will not allow intrusion onto ~ ~ 5- r r r unstable ground or ground subject to floods. It merely allows the ,O,_ n + transfer of density to property capable of accommodating that 's F -s z~r density. In fact, as mentioned above, by reducing the incentive~~ } to develop in wetlands and allowin * the maintenance of density , ,~~x" i s already zoned for the property as a whole this textual change 4a 1-1 [ @ Jig --N'+ 1' i ' J t advances this goal. ]~~fl gg - N,NQVM t h " - ,.-'i,"a GOal #8 T -A- F{_`-' "To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of fit`{ t the state and visitors, and where appropriate, to s to, ~a 4 provide for the siting of necessary recreational , , i r ~ « facilities including destination resorts." 3 k ° tx r_ kRx , k . Comment: This request is not impacted by this goal. rE k fd TY1 a O ~ -1 _ --1' ,Y L, ^r~ !f y ) 7 , i - is ~ ; 5 r C i } _ - t to a ~ r ,-R+a•as w. asrh`x^-^ , t' - ~ ~*yzr'.a,..,,- xr sKK ,x' ^ ~t--"Z 'w- „'sA °s,r x'+^ -g A tiI - e F s tat d7 - >a U t _ 11 '~a f L,f- - .t,S x _ w c h - ,Sts _r " ti } 3,,-3-j" ~.Y - - r P ' s . , 4~ ~ , I I - - ~ I - - ~ I , 11 07J~, 1~'_L",~ 11 , 1. , 1 -Q- :k ~ N, RAY-a _ _r' qr- ° 1 t 2- A ~ , 05, - t ~f- - ' 5rb~~"- 'T t r+ _ ariira ' ~ Hk~"}?Y'G°-5`S.`•'au zcs•:..a:aiz,~:~"=+~x+'um:Sv 1i r : t-fro 3 .fir -.~T,^r I", I ~ i ~W3 i) a a - r - - ~a}'v Goal #9 4E , - k ~ .~'t k,- s, - fN Z-" ,~j "To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state r - ''tv- economic activities vital to the t - Y,!~ V „ - - ra ,,k `g:;= for a variety of Rw_, 4 x> ,j health, welfare, sad prosperity of Oregon's citizens." s_a~ i f - IY Comment: This goal is applicable to any activity undertaken by -x c , - 3 R G - _ humans in the State of Oregon and City of Tigard. Its purpose is a,~ -1 ~ ,u:.F, ' ¢5 J y to assure that comprehensive plans and policies contribute to a~ ye- 1 4 a" stable and healthy economy for the State and Tigard. The Xt 4t comprehensive plans are to be based on inventories of areas - J _ , n~~'5 w suitable for increased economic growth and activity after taking ,-e~1--1W.1 ~ r-_ into consideration, among a list of subjects, materials and YR * ~ a t energy availability and cost; labor market factors; availability'd~ of key public facilities; necessary support facilities; current 111- h J r a} ~ y ' Yet market forces; availability of renewable and non-renewable, e ,11 resources; availability of land; and pollution control { ? r r ,E , requirements. `s} f v This goal has its primary zoning focus on commercial and 4 N it industrial land. However, its general concepts can not be ignored - Vik ` , -a M . when discussing the residential development industry. The ~ , - a emphasis in the goal on consideration of energy costs, labor j ~ 10 ~ 2 ri. -1 ~ " ' ' market, current market forces and the availability of land is r 1--,' - r ti a relevant to the requested text amendment . Many of the jobs being m E - created in the electronics industry are not as high paying as y,~,,, -,,F, t r ° 3 z r those being lost in the traditional Ore on economic base. This, - 1`'`1 ✓ per g Q ~ A Y A3 . , combined with a rapid decrease in the availability of s-,~- ~ 1-9~ f iw r;» residentially zoned property to shoulder the influx of labor to fp,, d~,` s{lx,~`~t "gib S 1~ - Ltnt`e b ~ 3 fill the new economic base results in the need to seek every; ' s z' - - fihg4 ; Stu y/ F 'Y .eF- A - S - kM RrE E,F. ".hives r~.z 4 Y~'i ,,.I L$ 9 C, zs r y.- sk - .err za .r v_~ ^zear^ -;v+~` e .r.,:nar „ai'~s.^? r.' 7,' ..c^" .7 t'Yb7 a -s W , LL~- - r J4r` e d r Y~ t aT t - a 1j - - l 'r - * n s rs - E ~ ~ ~t, - - , I - , - , ~ , ,~i__ : _ 1 i 4 pt 1 - J{+i f" $ Y P, 1-1 ~ - - , . - , - ~ 1 -_.l r -h[_~-.l x~r~.i x ~LL..t L_._ _i .E ti to - As ' - - 5 g i4 tot er H. - Y F+ 'rte 4 - - - +TC Avg ~~'4.'#i-G c# ~~_~Za. ..e-..:...+~ar waNteaSa.u.' ..~.X»,•.~F' _ '".°'g.,a^"~'5YS=eiamewu -y-~ixti"~+^-~~{S ~f `~3 . J -A Emy y avenue available to keep the cost of housing as low as possible. 2 Y 1 By allowing a 1008 density transfer from wetlands to suitable u , a~~,t~ b3~,~zt 4 7C IV= 40 Wan MTO residential land the availability of the additional housing units 5~.3-Y h}-.5 wV R 4 L Eek{~ F# should help deflect some of the imbalance in the present supply- ~a E9 zv FMW demand ratio for residential housing in the Portland Metropolitans t- a Area. See discussion under goal 10 infra. s t 4e~- - - -h "z Xx4 + 1Goal #10 4 $s t ~ ,,"To provide for the housing needs of citizens of the y "'`'"y,.,e:•,°a ,5,~CC x state." MOM M&A Commene: A key element in this goal is the concept of buildable lands. The goal indicates that comprehensive plans shallz F~ µ Tf- 4 '4 M encourage the availability of adequate numbers of needed housing 'R t , ~ J units at price ranges and rent levels which are commensurate withf r`,es 4!4 g the financial capabilities of Oregon households and allow for 5AZ flexibility of housing location, type and density. Buildable F~ s ~ lands refers to urban and urbanizable areas that are suitable, T z # ` available and necessary for residential use. y The existing Tigard Comprehensive Plan and land use d # Z regulations limiting the transferability of resident density Now"= associated with wetlands is having the effect of limiting W-WATWO I AgmMAN n- so; Tigard's ability to comply with this goal. Removal of the present Lrx #~-_;w 1 i a lE s mqZZA, W` restriction to transferring 100% of a wetland's density will increase the availability of residential housing stock by ' allowing the total density of a site to be located on land i,, 3, s suitable for the use intended. The evidence that such increased housing stock is necessary is easily found by reference to the WAIT- "01-- r t' ax! 3 Alm Ma s ~ ~ v TMs` •n, c af' ,r-- ,ssM......--,....,e.,wmv«znw,scw x ,.Y^"'*'4 •,•.'x.Y"te k:a~^1::5`C - ' L+K ,r' _ i c%z`, `.ry -s..,;e 1,4- ,,F of s"~ _ y,re+ W-W LF, t4, - { - - {5 gm K ANN {3 N Cth { f q - ,d - - p ~ - ,~_y' ~pg-,FJ r~'1.-`✓ ~ I - R tot; IV n t a2:4 y 2 t -ov MY'r }qtr d' 3 b i _ S 1 ~ _ obl Y ~ _~..r-~~-.,.~>.c~° ~---ter' - - _ - - _ : , .l. - - t a 2 z ' u-v-`' F m l.- _ _ 1 _ - j a a u , J r t r~ - y{ ~X 'z-e~'.t. `P3 n` x'14 u.wwxwWb.s:.lsr.63'+3..:ud.6.::Y:i'w .an§s ACaa i`sa'~ ia:r.. t v "#53~.~ 12i t , - Y Urban Growth Boundary expansian debates now being dealt with by s b , - „ # r 7 3 3 ~4, Metro. ~~c 'i - ,k as - r"~ In a recent case out of the Land Use Board of Appeals the y 5j h e _e - } concept of a local government needing to look hard at any means ~a?x a ` k y: t z t.t.. n.. . rhan nrnurth hn,±nda rig ( c %z of iiivrcasing d8iial witai,.,, an Cxi ..ti ~ _ 1 ~ was brought to light. In 1000 Friends of Oregoa v. City of North #~r r- F " - f _ "3 ` -z Plains, 27 Or Luba 372 (1994) the Land Use Board of Appeals ~m found, in adopting the argument of co-petitioner Department of~~ y ~ t ti Land Conservation and Development, that before a city can justify--~ ' z Y a .-M. 4'„ expanding its urban growth boundary it must attempt to increase ' £N"£?..~I1 - ? 1-7 . density, via density transfers, within its existing boundary. - n: 1 11. LUBA stated at 27 Or Luba 408-409: I 11 S "The City's position that it has only 24 acres of land £ x U - ti. buildable for housing, and thus not enough to t+-'- ~ ' -t-saccommodate the projected [yearl 2010 population, is ' >.x ~ ~ ~ ~t unsupported. Although some of the City's land that is k zoned for housing and currently undeveloped is in af } T z flood plain and therefore not buildable, the city has a gin; a , L ' density transfer' clause in its acknowledged plan. By - that clause, the City can increase the density in ~n ~ ~ ~ another area of buildable land to make up for the~~ # planned for, but unbuildable housing in the floodplain a` area. The City did not analyze the impact of that c clause. The City cannot justify a VGB expansion based x ' oa a need for housing when it has not analyzed its - -i options to accommodate additional housing within its ` R k BFI 4itl - l current boundaries. ° Bold emphasis added. - 2 Ty -i $ y ,.,k a - z While the facts in that case are not identical to those . as which surround this request they are very similar and the thrust x~~ °,-51 i of DLCD and LUBA's reasoning can not be ignored. The fact that fizz I,- ~ - Tigard's plan arbitrarily limits density transfers from wetland , 3 W j~ ,'P j s 'T''"t j areas by 75 S will become an issue to the City if it ever wishes r 4 , ~tI t~ , P S k X 'St-y ~ ) _^y~ T C- Y - .,Y Y ' --'f; T ,f p - 3- " E E m -9-f ri s 11W. ~ x k,` _ :E 't n n § _ a b ro - y r- A" tg,-z -'-s-- _x =3* - r-- -.x- -Pr=-,.^„ •a=I'r'x',Ie-4-=~ , . wfi`.',."'~`w5. Sa R_ 1t- - _ _ jai K" e ,%'I~z ey 3 - ax t -f: v - - r SF , y_ t 1 _ y V. -0-A- " E t-a-F k - - 3- errs c Sri it ~k -~,,'n~,' 12 , . " ~ - i,~ , , -1 I.- - - - 0- . , , ,r ;"1 v k - 4 Y' 3. TN 1 T ~9 f j ~ 1 }f} r% v a 'E'az .M x -S a J + _ 'i f a ~f e } x r s- e p 3 k - i, r . `~-C+-~-u y .,mot ~-r~ ,1 _ _ mrt--•rr^-~^.- c~~~ Y..- _ . ~-IYr_.~d_~ ~T J .-i„~ - ^ ~ i•~.2 -3- _.~~_~A _ - _ _ --r_ - - - - - I - r S, , , ~a , ~ I - - 1, " i t'sx r a t Y _ + f~ 1£ `~S~ i ,yYx ~ -€~-'r . 4 --7=#,~ e; ' , x - xr { sy.,E r'`"¢ - t'"s ,{~-'~3Fraz s 3 y t v - t - _ 4.+ d_._c_. "a- ~ y +~s - iY'~ Rb 5 § { yf - F ,s .,r ,:a.:ax~„rt r ~ . i-r: ..r, ..~>..h.. r N _ , ~ ~ 4 +s 3' Rk~ . ~t , - 's)~T° -cam i3 i \ yr to expand its UGB. By changing the text now, as proposed in this 4 '.S +L1 M r V request, that future problem can be eliminated. PO ° 4 • 1. t1kr 4 In addition to the above identified reasoning of DLCD and § ' ~-,.45~r t,~ LUBA the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) has j 9 ' a r 4ca z~ "Rte, adopted Administrative Rules which require proof that sufficient ..€v' , , reasoning has been undertaken and documented to support Tigard's ",t' ~ ~4 - ~ 1 s I , ~f limitation density transfer. For example Oregon Administrative w'g ~ _ Rule 660-07-015 states: -91 , r 1~ + ' "Local approval standards, special conditions and # ? -xg a t procedures regulating the development of needed housing i must be clear and objective, and must not have the # y4-f~~1a " effect, either of themselves or cumulatively, of ~ { w` ` I discouraging needed housing through unreasonable coat (a',Ls or delay. Emphasis added ~"s - V } 1 The limitation of zoned density transfer to only 25% of what can I i `r' be a significant portion of a site has the effect of unreasonably ~ "a ~1 increasing the cost of housing within the City of Tigard because - of the limitation's impact on housing supply while demand is°rk#~~ growing rapidly. The requested text change will eliminate that ~ s e 3 a negative impact. ,r ` i Another administrative rule adopted by the LCDC indicates ,n X--~ fi - F y the practice of limiting density transfers from wetlands is k~AS - x r4' ~ l questionable. OAR 660-08-000, which was created to assist in° r k x- , UM " r + r'z: implementing goal 10, states: [ , I " 11 (1) The purpose of this rule is to assure opportunity t r r for the provision of adequate numbers of needed housing"E` ' V-~1 r z units, the efficient use of buildable land within urban f t growth boundaries, and to provide greater certainty in t { the development process so as to reduce housing coats. 3 ~r''4 ry A This rule is intended to define standards for 6 ~4 t$ compliance with Goal 10 "Housing" and to implement ORS i a 197.303 through 197.307." , y4 ' 4 a a a -10- t 3 s - . ~ nzax-,-- -are v ha • x.- ~.r.~rr.,s+.r• ra ~ - ~ r wK-T r a s",'"' ~ , 'ZX SS th -,r f - t y t - 1 iF -a a 7 - Y-' -t r ycrw{ a s i i y rhx w4y C S -~t -ta _ _ -S ~f f N 2 , -t a t 3 rya ti" .rc ~ art t y i - 1 A t _ 7 - ~s "4 tr r _.s.-. ._c._ T.cr~F' k - I -11 F , ~ --,~-t, _ Wiz-; - - t '-is ~j - 4,ti.~ys~-+~ -~jC ~x.•~a.3~.mis -.o...nx.,~.-awna~..wzusz7.~.raucw.~„.m s°sw M a _t'4Y.7$.*-'o` i 'E' a Via, -v~ z: - u 'I %2 1-j,k -,,,,,~,,,,~t~ ~ ~ , 1. 70 s 5. r, 3 To this author the unnecessa limiting of housing density i'r ~ i'& .,,r~ -ti s i yf 3 r transfers from wetland areas would seem to be inconsistent with = - , } € € 1M LCDC polity." Ta , a For those who would argue that Tigard is dense enough now t ati }i why encourage more density, the subject proposal does not alter 4R-' , r a - . 3-- the existing density. It merely allows existing zoned density to z s qs, , - - H become an actuality. The LCDC has indicated by rule what Tigard's;Z k f ~Q 'K fair share of the region housing must be. That figure is found in 4 i a FBI i sz , ~ , S "I"', OAR 660-07-035 which indicates Tigard must maintain an average g2 ~f w density of 10 housing units or more per acre. If Tigard's present - ~ 'i" 11 ~V~ L f density is 10 units an acre the allowance for 100% densityh ~tM r # g g Y dt YptlR transfer will maintain that. If Ti ard's existin densit is less than 10 units per acre then the proposed textual amendment will ±3~ , ,W eliminate a hinderance to Tigard ultimately achieving the 10 unit w a 010, - tee'` . a. x ° - #.y:l r a+` y r~ j F L. per acre mandate. As OAR 660-07-035 states: ~ VA r "The following standards shall apply to those " , _ jurisdictions which provide the opportunity for at z L 111 - - least 50 percent of new residential units to be ~T;~ x ' attached single family housing or multiple family ~ k'~~ k ° housing: 3 "s T "(3) Multnomah County and the cities of Portland,"' ~g~ a s Gresham, Beaverton, Hillsboro, Lake Oswego and Tigard ^ must provide for as overall density of tea or more b ' dwelling units per get buildable acre.l_~ ~g~; Y r +a -t$ 'I 2Q, 9 ' 1 (3) "Buildable Land" means residentially designated i ' ' vt j r r vacant and, at the option of the local jurisdiction, vyY t~r E r k redevelopable land within the Metro urban growth boundary that is F not severely constrained by natural hazards (Statewide Planning :3^ C z- y~--,f.t ` Goal 7) or subject to natural resource protection measures :f , ice`-, - ~,-Y {Statewide Planning Goals 5 and 15). Publicly owned land is "x ~Z` V , 'F` generally not considered available for residential use. Land with , r ,Ye"i slopes of 25 percent or greater unless otherwise provided for at Fr jt ~,-V"L,~~,,~,~,,-,'~,,~~,,,~,;~~,;-,; F P~w , -4 , , C~ `:-----1- f ~ a4 , t w. a,"5"S3G` - k+ . 7 ; " R 7,7 - `.~.'R`, max' ..~.i ^s nor- .»,gr,„~.s~;-va.^-^.s"a+: e:f,~,;^"" - t ✓ 7' ~ c- y s fig, t f $ "Jik anF _5'+i$ ~''-'R a` _ _ =i r - ifs,- s.g S s: ; ,Y'W" - xa, - ~ 5 w -nw , 12 , - , , ~ - - ~ , , - ~ a,r -,aY v ,J"" - f - - 1 t . z ta, .g F j 4f a. 7 a r h W i M z ~7 ! r t _ t 5 6!t S t d t _ - - 7 „ - - - m-awQ±.xn~r^.F.~~R.....~.....s+~.-.~ _ _ s f c Mt 'Q, A - J 3.,SF,.' t 5F < r - ; # Sca~qs;F,z n t t'j - -p3 i' t .rh>` r 3trz,'r'{ .3 MA s5 z y, c 4 a 4 - 3f :.s Vii' a # ~ ~'as*%. F c.- #.d ......-.a...,w,on..a~,wu:...4.s.,aaas"" - e,:.°F s "s^.-•. - a d .fier y :z~ k t g§ t a j 3 c x~ v ks 3 s f `c - v .d - rw x. S 3 fi ~ .,,5 - n F ,b It is this author's understanding that when net buildable acres V. 10 $ were calculated in Tigard inventoried as well as uninventoried e p"- i , c srt _ ' 1 f~ wetlands were not subtracted from the calculation of nett, 5F { zap sty d buildable acre. The existing Tigard Comprehensive Plan did not `4 ® z -ter `net-out' wetlands even if they are now recognized as part of a 7;~t ~k _ - Y . 3 Goal 5 resource inventory. Since they were not `netted out' then sar their density should not merely be dismissed or reduced by 75% in _ 1-WI - the final accounting without a corresponding reduction in I K s L^ti ~r x rr~ 7 n Tigard's buildable lands housing inventory figures., ~-".#ak I 1-F, -1 max The need to better utilize the existing land within the UGB I Y> z ``ft d...rr „-,i-.n<d wr tea,. `t f is not just an other city's problem. Regional Coordination to ;1" y F sry1z, p accommodate the growing population's housing need is a ~ A requirement of LCDC goals and rules. OAR 660-08-030 states: .11- Z ~4' ~ "(1) Each local government shall consider the needs of g a I {m s the relevant region in arriving at a fair allocation of c~ s housing types and densities. v{~ , for ensurinalthatrtheaon body shall be responsible rn ~ _"f t g regional housing impacts of restrictive or expansive local government programs are K ,X ~t j considered. The local coordination body shall ensure ^-n f that needed housing is provided for on a regional basis' kg mac. a r _ r through coordinated comprehensive plans., € '-V1 W k z-v The requested comprehensive plan textual change is not only good F ,L ' for the applicant it is good for Tigard and the entire E s 1- I ~k h Metropolitan region. b ~ rI . [E N .r~ 34 r_ 2-''~--~ the time of acknowledgment and land within the 100-year }-;6' TT,,r7. floodplain is generally considered unbuildable for purposes of ;xF - k `t density calculations. OAR 660-07-005(3) r+ ? at e hr 't -12- % 4 N", .1' Y w f r1 tl! t- 4 14 y Y` g _ f t a "y{t G - ~,FT 'w. -rt' - - e r y K-r, ;'r, 'T-: s Y {X. { b n{ l__Y _ 1111+r viz w,;~. #f~.wf': '"2- +.:~14;?"°:ti k~:., ° kaY 'naY ff ~ _ - cep t . -°ux ~y ~v{.~44" y , E rysi ~ 3 -t - ~'t V f r -xx,- -T.01 , Z!X , - ~ . . E - , I ~ - - " x c ` w ' r - i 1 , F~. ' r ' ~,d y ~.mot s+-v s d; # - ' - e-s j- ,s'& ; z'.;i p ~r F , ro y Mail 3 s a T I ~ I 0 , , v rm Z rc~ v'Y ti F - eY - 'i - - ~VT'4 Te- - 4 _ x e F r T E S _ _ - y y 'ray' 1,✓' t _ - } ~ - y 15 .f 2' Y ' ,rte-„ x- 4 -%._t- , - ~ y~ $ £ IRRR$$ a xrt4~- , 'ate{ { ~c I ~ k a rah € s"y,` x , x. C , s > x LLAI~j ~i~ y~ ( Goal #11 ` r~ } a - aN*r , ~,1 \rf To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient Al t arrangement of public facilities and services to serve V-V :e- - ' as a framework for urban and rural development. r~:s _ s t,~_ ~z E, Comment: The requested textual amendment aids in achieving goal " z % " x10% , -r I a ' 11. The increased percentage of density that can be transferred ~2 c~ R k- 'i` z as a result of the text amendment aids in the efficient use of "g;7 - i i - , , -s _ r!' public facilities and services. The City of Tigard has already k g adopted a public facilities plan which is designed to service the,r s tki1k - 1 `g areas within its boundaries according to their zoning. Assuring ~ ~ 4, yy r= # f - -FFe s'~' aF^ ~ -4 the use of those facilities to their design capacity results ins" - -~Y~e their efficient use as required by the goal. j~ , I .1 -1 Goal #12 pF H TX's " " . ~-i f "To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and ; g 11 economic transportation system". b,~ t~ ' T4 1-- 4'X -M'yiyk i - f Comment: The impact of the proposed textual change on existing Z and planned transportation systems is a theoretical increase the z a ~ number of riders on mass transit. The increased number of housing T~ k E units within the UGB resulting from 100% density transfer is t consistent with the desire for a more efficient use of mass , i; "h,r5 3 transit systems. The increased number of infill units resulting 1 K F, a F - from this proposed amendment adds to the number of people who F 3 r r -'r -fi=r w will use the already existing and tax payer subsidized Tri-Met 3~ , operation. This is the alternative to leap-city commuter I § r - , r dependent development in areas such as McMinnville, Dundee, s { t a t . s }i ' Lafyette. _ - - "kt 1 y r t#.c , ,y--{ t - x r.. - ' fir, z It ;.V I q , j 4 j j' - 'Ye r2 MM, r ° , -13- KW " , ? -_)z,j,--,m,,-, ,!~I, ~,,4_~'! . zk. y / t cis t £ „1a ~ ~r rte' ss -rr .wm~ r s»,v a.,r M..w.,t' ?'rx U - r "%,.k., ~ rgv, ~ c _'~,f f 4 _ 1 - - fi -w V, } s' s ` x - ~ ` z S f r (4{ _ } try d 1`11 I r' x5 ; N h - 1NR2^c >4f k - 9 s , M 3 n. r 6h , h S' f M c -.z may. a 1 - ° tM i f' 'l .~..~-+..-.;..ra _,r-....vv.-.-.+~wS[yr-'R;._~'at; - „l'.~`~"-~`-P^-^re~-^~: "T "-+~.-.,w 55tT.'^'.w'^'F~1 .'~yna.•' w.."~ 7t SM -gg jMV Iw s>s y of s$ w x ~M_A, MOM M215 M OR SX-11 20 F€ n_'asty' _ x `3, Z AM% 1;p, iz~ 4,12,11 t j Goal #13 E f ` "To conserve energy". " } y 3~ Comment: This goal emphases the need to assure that land and y-- .s N _f uses developed on the land shall be managed and controlled so as wi~1 3r'+ iy 34 - - - - qWD { to maximize the conservation of all forms of energy, based uponM z3 Nk- ee- sound economic principles. The subject request is in conformance with this goal since its effect will be to increase the number of zx, F~~ r ti f r housing units which can be located on infill lots or tracts. This -1 -INN - ' is a key component in the Urban Growth Boundary concept. By n s _ s 'IN increasing the efficiency of land uses within the UGB the cost of 3 r_r servicing new development will be decreased on aper-capita rr tt h, basis. This in turn results in the conservation of energy types r }ham needed to accommodate the needs of Tigard's citizens such as the "Ok ik $ use of mass transit instead of the automobile, less necessity to in s tv manufacture and install utility lines over unoccupied distances, 4 y- -rt C n v- etc. an-.Nfi , r ',a Goal #14 _ ~ - To provide for an orderly and efficient transition u' from rural to urban land use." A C V, omment: Much of the discussion about the compatibility of the gg=fig r j h t t NO f- proposed comprehensive plan text amendment with the first 13 k~4 1[ - - "ZMI, F is t Fr ' r ~ ~ ap goals is equally applicable to the discussion of this goal. Goal r 14 requires that development of land within the Urban Growth F y i { f~ { Boundary be encouraged before conversion of urbanizable land and , s IVY' "0 i that development of urbanizable land be encouraged before FF , kk development of rural land. This mandate is heavily relied upon as IF ° the basis for LUBA's decision in the aforementioned case of 5000 [ tF ¢ is e } -14 - - , Q - ''£t r f av_ 5r l1~, s S ~a v t ^~~q - ars ~ 0~~ gy~J ~ ~ .#P r fit dy ~7 a y w r t ~ s Y fY+~'xl t sear - z..^- -.r^ -m x. a' w a - €'fx Kr r : h d 8 ~ J'..? R r Rit! 3'a M-1p ~ , k 1i = , I_V~- ,~~,E~~'r-_.~~ . , . L - Sk , s-,-, i - 4~,, _Vyi t , , , t - Y" s_ i>`z1' y t>- " °"y- -say. z 111, ~ . .e~-t',. , f t`, > - - - r - r 6~ ~ , '01 I r - i ~-7~ ' ,,kt j Friends of Oregon v. City of North Plains. Goal 14 also stress r' x 4 z r er a , `tl x h {x, , 3- the need to consider orderly and economic provision of public t - .,max e Jt M a;, facilities, the need for housing and the "maximum efficiency of , ;P5,` f , land uses within and on the fringe of existing urban areas. All a r~ those issues have been discussed earlier in this document. The4a 11 71, 11 I ~ r 7 t need to allow for use of wetland density to meet all those-ti- s 11 y vY- - consideration should be abundantly clear.Y g ~ + r~ k* TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES % ttt Different policies apply to specific textual amendmentsti~-, x 1' ,f -1 r; r,,; 99w, - t ~ °r<;,"f~ depending upon the nature of the proposed amendment. What follows P'-1 is applicant's interpretation of the relevant comprehensive plan fi ' iJ -9- - - 1. n --a~„Yjx. 'gym '-std-.,r.. i policies. If any policies are determined to be insufficiently ~ - mow, addressed a supplemental amendment document will be submitted." - 2 a { " -'4 •~r' rr cs 4 } CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT ax~_ This textual amendment shall comply with and will not alter } 11 ' this policy in any manner. The appropriate neighborhood planning 4~ r- - { , k , organizations will be notified and their comments will be , % 1, I f, a r. ' ' requested pursuant to the appropriate statutory and code i F t 1 r rr provisions. The applicant will comply with the notice 4 _ I , , a , " ~ . [6 s - 2,, " requirements governing comprehensive plan amendments. Y~ a xf< x c , NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE t a~ ' - ~ The portion of this plan policy section relevant to this a rg j'K, aft a a - # . ~'2fA 'I " j + - <r 'mss x application it that which deals with wetlands. The proposal does "T,#x 3" L'' e < - ~,r l tax#K i t ,w not in any manner alter the goals or policies of the plan ~ . s ~ ' , r ` " 4, aka , e -15- F ~,,MJZ . Cr ass' _ S 'X.4~ 4 r` J." ~k~ t Iii , y t r 7 '~,+y. r gay ° Y k x _ ,....c,. 'z".rmn a1 xu .ws' .rte c4z- Mra b,.,.a nn„.Zma„- m- "k. ' - .z Y- - - fir,-~ - 't{F .L . . ~ 1, ' - 6 . ' - , " . ~i, ~ ~ ~ ,:,!i i . t ~ , ~ i " , ~ ~ , " j I - , gyp' t ter! `"rte at P - - t 4 r _ ~r s, 21 ` r { t r -r z 3 A } (ate' 5 it - - - _ .G' . £ k k n> > cjn, x ,t,. 1 i.S - - - - - - .E :yam s i._ L. _~sC, ~..___rL__ s_.,__..-", . {r.- _r. _ _.S_ 1 C___1 `j M 5 'y ; Y t ba r 3 k '1 nvrs iivi hou a -y ss § '.~.a,i-+1 °~i xf F$ -.F_, s - v - 4 f 'fit{tip sip ` -fi°F4- ~~Vs Mfv ~ f x M.y Q 0 MR '4 AVA RON N W--Mm 5¢ _ c p r' regarding the protection of wetlands. The proposed text change N 5-N -.rxi"'b'°t!s.(F` kW ga24 'w k e~ - { f 1J 0- "Mm n will assist in making wetland protection less onerous on the individual property owner. The incentive to intrude onto wetland x-r $ f areas to capture another housing unit will be lessened because fv snag ma with 100% density transfer that additional housing unit can be kE s $ ~Z< ` located on the site in a manner which recognizes and protects the ° wetland. try T 1 4} - According to City of Tigard data the City has inventoried V~ y approximately 180 acres of wetland. Applicant's land is located too 3 BEEN - in the vicinity of the wetland identified on City maps as C-12. A r riq~~ ' w' Imam %a wyMy', v review of the general mapped location of wetland C-12 is J "wx a OEM= 'x e inconclusive as to whether the subject site has any land included in wetland C-12. If it does fall within the C-12 wetland the c~$a k c ~ g ~ ty±f~ .i, a subject site is only minimally included within the boundaries of c~' ~r~T'~~~ t7,a a * c t that wetland area. The proposal will not in any manner deteriorate the protection afforded that wetland or any otherf # wetland by the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. (See wetland map in the ~i # appendix to this application). ms 00-,oaq sew AIR, WATER & LAND RESOURCES QUALITY E r~ This policy relates to Statewide Planning Goal ##6. The main ` C thrust of the policy is to protect the public from being • ' `a overburdened with untreated waste and process discharges from : t F t CIA u future development. The subject application will not negatively +i y E impact the purposes or intent of this plan provision. The £Y~ Err 1 4 W necessary waste and process discharge containment systems are in the vicinity of the site and will be connected to the on-site + "BAW L rF }g i Ems Mew— -16- za~~ sus St r a r< in« E 0 y - r+51 _ - ~°.n' r..P:~~s^ ~~aw. , revc ,.w e r,° x•.r_.a- -r '"9c` ,r : n' rt-%S"~''x`a a - f 77777=_ Off unna"j- Y-0 qw ~fi WI ~'a { f-.--.-$ no-am "Mumma ~ d rid s 2 - t ry ~ t o s ti x a, 9s C t S~o -A, K JIM fit,fia 5 ya`1. f A Y - ``FF s -3 p"a' P - t C - NOW,, ART Fig 5 y ~ zg ff, e ~ l 5'* ate'`a" t<`;;• y _ n Tait \ gi' .ems f 41 3-,N-U, x ` 3 e systems. In relation to air quality the proposed text change willf k«- " '30 0 allow the overall goal of maintaining or improving existing air x` a s quality protection to be better met. By furthering compact growth£ , oil i ' and urban growth boundary infill the goal of protecting they •ti region's air shed from automobile exhaust inundation will be r R a 4 implemented by the corresponding increase in the opportunity fort f - a,"Z people to use mass transit. ECONOMY ? ,1 W"i 'R Wil", 10 "~-ts gi.,~ `mss x u # This proposal furthers the action plan identified in t~ j r rE , `f' 7 Tigard's Comprehensive Plan relating to this policy. The most _ - ~ - ~ ss*~~ tea- r _ directly applicable action plan is found in the portion of the )y+' ;~F~ ~r- policy dealing with Tigard's municipal codes. The action plan YNZ: states, regarding municipal codes, that: rr r "Within the Tigard Community Development Codei tx r modifications have been and will continue to be made to °`r F existing processes to streamline development, a lication periods, to rovide flexibility in some{' land use aras and to allow maximum economic use ofx land. Emphasis added 'rte § The subject proposal will definitely assist in assuring that the maximum economic use of land will occur. By allowing full density z { transfer from wetland areas, rather than restricting it by 75t, y~w land owners are better able to realize full economic use of their a ~r~ f lands. The existing plan and code provisions relating to wetlands{ t rS punish the land owners for having wetlands on their property.„ _ , ,F " Those negative regulations actually work against the goal of k maximizing land use and protection of wetland. `i r des , t- Economy policy implementation strategy 13(c) states that i i j N'Z x3x r r - -17- ms=s rfZ,,,•1ur#,~Y j F47 _ F a ~ i"T' u !ice ~~r -~i #r ts. r.;. sv vrrc;s wvr~ -^w a :zTM,.,*..x:z=v,er."....x -tea n .a-+r i a prn^, e3 z 3 k5 k-Y"" w s..: ~1-` i ,x - t _44 Wip g4q. "N' ZVI- k - t - u + yeti J'~ g~ 5 •.i 5, v 'ter r s - _ _ - T % r t # r ray s{ fr jw~ r . , -,'Z R,°~ , ate.: , - a - - r,- , i - a qq ~ 0 iv~ , U, ~ 'k - , , - ~ ~ " . -,',,F~,~ - d" S - S aK. E - - Y 'i`' guy E t ln~ i 11-1 4: R I I , I - - - , - - , , - , , . 11--W: - fi r.aa•rt c T ",,-=a kTq r4 i 'r-..- ` , N . N-1 5` ar... t t - 5 T F ii i p, ~e k sPy. - L Y 4,4 2{,i "z. s N d- r M Tigard will aid in the effective utilization of the land, energy ` gkk y and human resources." The proposed text change implements ` that ) x,.- xX,, I strategy. P ~ j U O HOUSING " sp f t" r' rr 7 tir-,j This chapter of Tigard s comprehensive lan is desi ned to P g , z implement statewide planning goal #10. However implementations L~~~ gL'" _ --Z I _ strategy 3 to policy 6.1.1 and implementation strategy 3 to x , may, _ [ Y - ' F ~1,$- r[ policy 6.4.1 are inconsistent with the purpose of the housing ,QQ -fir r. t- a ~ goal because the City interprets them to limit der_sity transfers a ~ f from wetland areas to only 25°s of their zoned density. F * a As discussed above the buildable lands inventory which is a -Cl „s key element in Tigard's housing plan and policies did not "net-$- v° i 1 ' ~ m :.E4 W.~ w ~ k out" the density associated with wetlands. The "survey of vacant ,-~E " } ~ , buildable lands in the Tigard plan area," -~%4 " (see appendix) only ~ t k netted out slopes exceeding 25°s and floodplain areas. They'n~~ a),:'' F inventory figures were created by multiplying the net acreage for ~V_ ~ , . k t' , , each specific zone by the density factor allowed in the zone. By - W. r including wetland areas in the net acreage and multiplying by the "W-- 4X, t _ applicable zone but then only allowing 25% of the zoned density k ~i~,, ti I- -NN A associated with the wetland acreage overstates the total number i ~ aF Z _ r of housing units allowed by Tigard. An analysis of existing data 'r , K a~ G p _VW . j'6 L w5 - rr 'ak C~ ~ € g reflecting the total inventoried wetland areas within the cit on J c§ h, land zoned for residential indicates that the overstatement in ' n~ E t the gross amount by about 1357 housing units (see appendix}. If_ { FF rg ` only 25°s of those units are allowed to be transferred because of ,g > x,t s z t I i - 11 the existing density transfer policies then the City has - -18- x > .-1 r ro Fz ^zP , v ' m7 vM trY - , M - . < * - C' ° a "°°°".°'~°•*uxm*,~cn..?n isw .sae. r tt +.,'w, °•w• r .s .ruv '>;°5`,.; J.="3~, Y"°~- i •a~. Min 1 `-t~, .*•,r r - - - - ` v~ :ate t r t r ate, r g--, U -,,~~~"-"."~,~.+.~,.'---,,~,',~"".~,,,,"i~~~-.',~..-, , j Y a ° ri r r - t* w - t r -'r, d 7 G 3 _ - - ? ~t r - x r H xs y-,, a . SIr - .ir Ski x.. } ~s r rk.{' . w. ' r - m7 f 4` M 4 J.f fl~L ~ :t , - . , , , , , ~ ~ , I- -`F1 11 - , - 2 Y• - - + r - --tl f i ~ - . _ i...c ~r_~'~ _ 7 yr a. ..y u ~ ~ .i.-. __~L'_:' - - ~1r i r - ~Ml I I M - ---,---11-111'1~`,~ ~ i-,- ~ IM W1 , - - S- _ k- _ _ _ s - F '6 I tA''.,"M°.-y, ¢ <`y.~e z L'- - - - 3 Lr+.- t,~ '-r'"}'4 `L I M d~-5 a ~~i .t t y 2.~".,a.. y t, - - ~ -3 - _ ,~S,4 F* z Gds I GS,srr 11 1 s ' ' overstated its overall housing inventory by (1350 x .75) about z -3- ffi~~t - 1,017 units. Furthermore, as is discussed above, under the t-h e <4 , e ' , , c sr-z , 3%- heading of statewide goal 10, the City is overstating the number 0s as a- - 4 r i of units per acre it is planning to accommodate within its "Z,- 11 1: P its .y. c ! - 'Al '4 planning area. Since LCDC has mandated an average of 10 unite per k z;~r acre the approximately 9% overstatement (1,017 or a totalT ya gyp, s _ projection of 11,769) will detract from the City s ability toa,_y ,7 mss'` -f housir * The )isrein proposed 4~- } meet its regional fair siiaic 2 ~F 1',~gK 'a , k t 1"+ Hyc k 4+e~` ITT qt textual change will eliminate that result. I~4_ } r PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES u s 3 k . xrtr - . , b The very concept of containing population growth within the 4 aF 3 ;,.q;~4.,,;c metropolitan urban growth boundary and Tigard's urban growth'Cr,~: boundary is predicated upon the belief that urban infill will ~J F','; allow efficient, effective and economical use of public -'Jx- 3 A G, a facilities. This proposal to remove a hinderance to urban infill a c~ z will further that concept. ri , TRANSPORTATION , xL ` ~ r r, - j y , v This policy implements statewide goal 12. The comments made r 4 r in this text thane a lication re ardin oal 12 are a'"~ - v g PP g 9 g 4ual ly x' - ,~L ~ - { „ s applicable to this plan policy. The above discussion regarding y - ~ %l public facilities and services is also appropriate comment on ,zsR~ r_ _ w~ ~,l T -this policy issue. p M ~ ' < ENERGY t, _ x s "N r'r ' zr This policy implements statewide goal 13. The comments made jam b'n~t F l~ - in this text change application regarding goal 13 are equally , ~ ss- 5 R c k - - w yx..1 - ¢ .4 - applicable to this plan policy. The above discussion regarding y -~4i,~ F 'g,'` y.. c^i ` ' - + d -19- t€rx -rm4g «rr', X31;- } ms's.Y.. ( _ k 5 c' Q 57 11, ( r~ 4 . ugh - # a r ~7 i 1w, -Pt a r - - 5 ; Jr 7 x~ "wr ra 3„ rxz a r°^re I 1x, _ n F s~,.~~,.'~? , t r', - rem -i.~ a'- _ r r 6 f ! ~n 4' Nam{„ d } H ~ p _ T X 'IV I ~ , , ~ , ~ r r " I - - ,:7, 'r , _ ~,11~ , . ~ , ~ I J--- ""11- .1. Ai-fNli~Mlj;, , --.,;t;-- -_~k ~ L2 I - - , - - 1'~,~ - 2 - -~~~:,~",~?~,~'-,-~~l,,.'~,'~,~,~~:~~~ x r a z A, , r M rLr bra, kx-s -,,r o ry a -r>; s ,4 K F,~.„~,r+ ,~Zl 4i_11 f- a 1 c/.,T ~ - - bar a9 ._«3} t - 1 ir'` _ d ¢ t t.ice-~a, ~•'~-`r' 4 - - - _ k 1 J~'-a^~ Fi Fs, tx4 a c-- - - - r-,r Yk ~l 4 `dxg4 ~2`s2f r Sa -f 5 -Ft. # 3 - 't 4% . 11.1 r 9f ---.Q~r.x." _ - . - - s __r_ a re ti - - irvy _'n 77 ,T WN as to got `z A; U ngw, MM, On'D NN it gmn - e xaa e .,s 3M' 52~+1~ k F-'T~s-ift~z' - ff 3-, public facilities and services is also appropriate comment on f Ya~# this comprehensive plan policy. 0 MM eS c URBANIZATION z c x ~ ~ v This policy implements statewide goal 14. The comments made V spa >h ty; ' in this text change application regarding goal 14 are equally $ r~s applicable to this plan policy. The above discussion regarding' x. ''lyi~:~zt=~,''2<w:j,:%xtij"*!~~ i.`.,J '?;F.~V''i."Y4^:'rr.~,r•'~.-"kr;s'"<i public facilities and services is also appropriate comment on mx tyF# i- 'S - this comprehensive plan policy. ?G b'°i' CONCLUSION k _ ~Mg,~ Y - This application for comprehensive plan textual change can kip r ~M z -M1 be viewed as either an opportunity to update Tigard's plan to assure that it has done what it can to accommodate increased yx am on } a + population growth in the region or a correction of an oversight is M a i k'' m ~ in the existing plan which works counter to Tigard's ability to 4 t `za comply with provisions of Statewide Goals 10 and 14. Either way,_` F _ F the City is benefitted by accepting applicant's request. The fi ✓ <k5~' applicant encourages Tigard to accept this modest text change Proposal.}`. € 4: tM E a # Respectfu y bmitted, liam C. x, Attorney for y s Applicant ECO jq~ {E _ - MO WCC/abh 10 r - x t rfi PROM to' MIWIMW e mod-- }'~&c~', T• - ~ - £ J - „o-.f ~T d~y~~~.4'ai ~ ~ - ji -20- r9 `r 4~ -~k -1 ~Y ~s 44t -4~~, k nw- ~a ty f r s 'S~ vx"I MO¢~~~~ F # 1 YF *N~.2°ppysA.,PW' z,CYS' 3`2F d „a,.,~ Y ^Y'".kLt i° '-"`F~'ia '2" fi'.M-T.'P^s'~r+m+%swuYr.^+,.st« - - A A r d "us "Own f4y„ b- 9s L .J 3 S~~ C Na f ,"g w, d L[t' ' son S vh .I,.2" k^' 41 5F f 1 f - Y-1it F ' exr- U F.`' r- s - 4 i f k s ,z'k`. rYk r -fff coon _ A Won-, ty S kt r x t ' to r r ? ~'.rX max. t . + - _ - • _ ah4 2 F d IN - I 01 4, T }yi,} - sue.'. R YR - F} - - r _ k- `C5' ri`~~ ..y ' r-,4 - t - - + - t k,Xa - }3?c ssk a,warea:s„ rio.ss arse, amuY... ~ u rf 42 r4, "t`-`".t; - - a z 11 11 9 - ~ { .i = ra ' `s= t i4 sty x r r s f Y r x yid A c s S f, , ' h # William C. COX UIIUfi1CY at law ?✓1 - ~L€s I N `Y"T 4 _ Yy ?az1.}" w a fit- m ~3' T )/I - .aws£_ `1. Land Use and Drtrloprnent Cansultunr y b I X, c P4b ^ Project .tifunngetnrnr o- k xs r `•w - .t~3 _ t ~ 7 May 8, 1996 xl`-~ ~ k z 1- ° s yt e~ a s ~ nay r - + Director of Community Development 4th ' I c/o Nels Mickaelson ? std, ~ ` =*Y, , - - City of Tigard s , Wl 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. r~ s k Y a ' { Tigard, Oregon 97223x r s K Re: Comprehensive Plan/Development Code text amendment G ABECO, applicant. b~,-~ K 4.t"}-rX-'. Additional explanation subsequent to 5/7/96 CIT meeting her= ~ r$ W Dear Nets, .A''~~~~ .1 . 11 -r zk t - g 'ia°-S - m y?~`~-.- - 7 t " PCB a Following our discussion at last evening's CIT meetin and r,- our phone conversation this morning I wish to further identify +E zf 4,''i 4 s the limited scope of the proposed amendment. Please treat this a~F ~`A- f+ r 11 . - letter as a substitute for the one I sent yesterday (May 7, 1996). The ABECO amendment proposal is limited in its scope to ":a LZI 1 y -r, ` j . only the transfer of density from wetlands located on parcels and ~r~~rl YY y~ Y lots zoned multi-family residential. When I use the term multi- ~1 Yt t family zone in the context of the proposed amendment I am 'r ffi, INKR71~ { referring to R-12, R-24 and R-40 zones. The amendment proposal, ; ~ t as written, can be interpreted to include other classificationst 1174 ~ sk,; of residentially zoned land. The amendment proposal however, 3 y should be interpreted as only referencing the transfer of density , - I - ) from wetlands located on land zoned R-12, R-24 and R-40.Y - *6'N4,-'0, w ' ,f To help clarify the proposed amendment's scope I have rewritten the proposed text changes and hereby submit the ;k ;r~z f~ t z following as the recruest. The applicant requests an amendment to ' , " , k the text of Comprehensive Plan Housing Policy 6.1.1, z Implementation Strate 3, and related provisions which limit ,,~z_~`, { i der_sit transfers fromywetland areas within R-12, R-24 and R-40 'p € a r ~11 11 ~ ~x k = a, zones. Tigard Planning Department has indicated that wetland `V1- , property is not sllowed any density transfer. Comprehensive Plan Policy 6.1.1(3) is proposed to be amended ?t `P ry7..w - -.-tx f d Y"~ - ? .x by adding the following policy statement to the existing plan L .a4 i , - e text: r t f -F' ? r f r z p - i-3 - 4Z . - °1 4°1 r t-_ -I- Mr ^'6 LasYrkS ~`~'xN ~ X " 11 R'^ _ 7 - .r rx x x 0244 S.W. California Street • Portland. Oregon 97219 • (503) 246-=499 • FAX (503) 244-8750 $ Y` ` a j,, d - , 7 - etzs- t , k. d~ t as 1t - t arY,r ~''~r G , 5 .pk. -112111i~ y7 y fT _ i...r 2.f 1°- F €l✓ h t x Mr'n„~$` r- M1 T -1 - , c r i r _ - _ _ - - _ - - z a~ cam' y'"`~+ ~`5 _ - ,r 3 _Y i i,~~~ 0 e 4 - Q N, -k ` - - - nA a r . ~j - _ x - G `a d sr , ix ; t ~ .i!t t mo' t` _LLLL_a,. .c».~,..:~ ~ y . ' Wit'- H~i Y° mS M 4 - - - .s_. r 'fir- 4 Na j' t' A ~~r`t t ~ - AT3r+ - Y~ b r, k` 3 hu - 3 ' 3 ' F '41 n - To enhance the protection of wetlands on multi-family ~ r' zoned property and to ensure the efficient use of f ` 4 3 k - multi-family zoned land, the Tigard Community { 4~ , "If £Y,J, Development Code, through the Planned Development ;fi Sys I}~ ; - 5i - r ,4. process, shall establish a procedure to allow multi- q, ax~4 ~ family zoned properties containing wetlands to develop, _ y. ~ with density transfers, to a density equal to the ` ¢'y A entire parcel's or lot's zoned density. t-- 3 ' ~k N 616, ,2 t 1 t 4 £ request Comthpramendmentehensive ) z~} --~~";-~;*~"-i~~,-~,,~-",~ 1~ I" -.4 , ` 1~11~ , ` - , Code (CDC) section 18. 92.020 (A) (1) as implemented by CDC - _s~ _ 18.92.030 which in turn implements Policv 6.1.1(3). This 1?n_gua_gA_ would implement the new policy language as proposed above. k ~ {r_ e 3~~ ` E CDC 18.92.030 would be amended to add the language contained y ? h ti in the bold italicized print with words to be deleted in brackets ? ~y s as follows: `"`°--s `9-1z.'' .*3. r' - A. Units per acre calculated by subtracting land areas .r"e 44c e~ ~ r listed in Subsection 18. 92.020 (A) (1) from the gross x- ~ " e'-6 . ~Y, -s acres may be transferred to the remaining buildable .a.} t; land areas subject to the following limitations oa aI2 -xsf Y s land other than that which is zoned R-12, R-24, and R- ?p + - ` - ~q -m r I. The number of units which can be transferred is , ~ k t~ limited to the number of units which would have ~'R ,4 been allowed on 25 percent of the unbuildable area v- s , if not for these regulations; y r'xf 2. The number of units is limited to 25 percent of x t( the total number of units which could have been t ~F _ constructed on the unbuildable area if not for `I~ ~ - these regulations; and - ,~r 3. The total number of units per site does not exceed ` 125 percent of the maximum number of units per .`d 4 ~ gross acre permitted for the applicable ' comprehensive plan designation. 11 s z`~, , v t _ _ - 1i-,5N ill- 'v~ Y B. Units per acre calculated by subtracting land areas less i~~ ~r j listed in Subsection I8.92.020(A)(1) from the gross i'Z~ " ~W acres may be transferred to the remaining buildable , , ' Sand areas on Sand zoned R-12, R-24 and R-40 subject to ~ rkk~4 r s the followia limitations : J g 2 t 2. The number of units which can be transferred is r ~ x `N - y limited to the number of units which would have &,4b3~ ~ l been allowed on the wetland area if not for these ri "g " k density transfer regulations; x ' . ) N t~- ~ }k a aaa R, - Yrfa.df r - ER, y' ~t }Y Y - Y k 5}''S F f""s L~In ' 7 s f, i r - t `'t = r L - , t _ _ a-~..,..n J~ ate, _ sc < .4 - u 4 F h 4 ! .d j' l't+~ C- f 4 - X 4~ - j z i . l - - a - rf L -i t ' sz~ t 4 "K a ~ U ' ~ ~ ~ , , , ~ ~ -S-`,-~-~-~~'4~ ml, - , - - - F K ( " i'"- _ t s , , h - 4 1 F r / r, f S t t~ a.-, § ,3 t t - R W; S gf z- e a r' ; -t - - ad r h y- Y. f~ f^ f ~ , . I I . ~ , ~ . , I 1 2a ; ~ _ , ....~.,_.L cs .,r ~_2,- - i._ -c - r. .a 1. r 11 E _t t _ ~•'~'M;: i n`f.,, a - - _ - § - } urn-xVy .r. 11 1 11 I? y ice` ` f - a ti - fk -rte raj~x g, j k 4 ;-I-1 J .,n ` 2. The number of units is limited to the total number S ~ sue; . +1 r of units which could have been alSowed on the 1 <a r unbuildable area if not for wetland preservation ° _ AU regulations; and r -a ~Gsi.k - as. 5 - .a '-`-'s~ ~ ? 3. The total number of units per site does not exceed M~-~ 1b -11 Z ~~a the maximum number of units per gross acre - - , permitted for the applicable comprehensive plan € ' s designation. t, t C. "All density transfer development proposals shall k~ 7-s IM; T 71 4 r,.l 5 - - F c l `h F:"•. s'. x, Sty y 111-1- _ comply ~ha ueveiopment standards of the applicable a'l`e'- ern - ~ underlying zoning district unless developed under the ,,a-scy , rovisions of Cha ter 18.80, Planned Develo ment. (Ord. ~k~-c + t~: , P P P ~ 89-06; Ord. 83-52) " R r Finally, since Subsection I8.92.020(A)(1) is referenced in x? ; ~ - t-Sz the proposed amendment text it will need to be modified by adding F# , 4-_ the term wetland to the list of sensitive land areas. Subsection , ~ 18.92.020(A)(1) would be revised by adding (1)(d) as follows: , s `4 "A. Net development area, in acres, shall be 'Y determined by subtracting the following land area(s) rt°. '',t from the gross acres, which is all of the land included j 4 in the legal description of the property: ,x ti~~ b ' y ` . . ~ [,;,~M~ ,F'E3}, , 1. All sensitive land areas: ` n `x r a. Land within the 100-year floodplain;- ` w~~ A b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%, [and] = 4.... fib- _ :g t~ i~'t rc°}} , c. Draina ewa s; and , - . x g Y r 6~ 1 - d. Wetlands; r ` z Please attach this letter to any official documents B- _~'~;,r regarding ABECO's comprehensive plan and development code text a~`._ ~ ~ ,t amendment. When in doubt about the scope of any statements made x X ~ ~ - r in the previously submitted documents consider that the proposed a r x ti st amendment only refers to wetlands in R-12, R-25 and R-40 zones..}, ,V9 17, , Y,' A ar{'a - . / ~1' / c- - a ro e r - - Wa•Yliant- i? ~1 - k tgL r stt 1 f4 r i 5 ji, _ M; - WCC/abh r n zm # f -i7 N t F t -3' ~ -a 0 CC: Client-° .,v : t _ f ; 1 x W'sF V y,,f, y ,i .11 t - -3 --1Y1r fit' a f.x E .aw. _ - yam, _ - _ `te~ i r ,y- - -1 4 _ - L y~ 5..-. ,4f Y el, 7 - Y .P - SW to R a rp J't Y' b [ , - , - , , , - ~ - . j - R,f~.P~~~-,-~,~~ U - ~ , ~ r 11 I - - - - , - , - - " '14 n - a 4 sf.s x r x. , b b a ate k to T'i - G t L Fb G. t F . v ~ __..71.Z .qtr a_ Y 1 _ ' {X a'.*~ _ t"F ~~-o.-~.1 Si - a _ - - _ = a t a - $ S"3-st.2#Nabztz _ Sir s3{i 1 Y," .S ".-ww..... '.~4S' ^'-e,a?..~..ti'k.~.11`.'.s ~ . _.,.i...-s.t,....:...,, Y a r..s-.a!......t.,.......5. ,..,.,,.......:..v.s:.....k...-~,v..:,...mr..a.I.:,.5. 3:.a.:a -eL ~Tt y .fir s s { } , V'g' c y t K - N b agenda Item: j r ct q 't j ' ,s{x 4i< 2 Hearing Date: June I i 1996 T ime: 7:30 PAt M1 z n d[ r I , ~ I A k 'w"', l - S- p _ - - - j- x - E - 4 - ~,i.Eh, i , 1W 3 y I', r '3 I*E 4 c y.. 1 z, ~r~ -t; ` STAFF REPORT {fS' i c ~a ,~~~~T [ -'L., 4 9 k - k H? 5 L F TO THE CITY COUNCIL t.. ~x6 FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 2 I t , - I. APPLICATION SUMMARY a - }t t _ r, via h ; Z 3Y","S2w1'-14"'3 f~. L~ CASE- FILE NAME: ABECO/Cox ' "T. ; r' Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone Ordinance Amendment J~" ~'.'g -51 5 -1 A CPA96 000320A96-0004 j , 1 - PROPOSAL: Amend the text of the Housing section of the Comprehensive # Plan by amending existing policy as follows: 6.1.1, ' ` h Implementation Strategy 3 - add language to allow 100% t~ T~ - I'll transfer of density from sites with wetlands which are zoned R ; r'- F k,' 12 R25, and R 40 from the wetland area to the buildable " f ` x% . - ` portion of the site. The application also proposes an " amendment to Tigard Community Development Code - 18.92.020 to include wetlands in the list of sensitive lands from g ~ z a v m ~x which density can be transferred, and 18.92.030 to allow 100 }w,FE , percent density transfer from wetland areas zoned R-12, R-25, w ~ a £ and R 40. ~ s" f N 11 . - } I APPLICANT: William Cox - - , 1 x 0244 S.W. California Street , '4 ' za 1. Portland, Oregon 97219 a-;, OWNER: ABECO Corporation 2 6205 S.W. Carman Dr. * " Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 ~k n ZONING 5 , ' t s DESIGNATION: NA -R' a r t_.- ` } LOCATION: City wide f ; - ku , 5 6"~, , 3 "15i s- „4 yJ I t APPLICABLE VsY ~ f ~ REVIEW ~ ~ j~f y 3' ' ' CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Tigard ,Y x , z Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.1(a), 1.1.1(c), 2.1.1, 3.4.1, 6.1.1, 8.1.1; Tigard Community ° s i f Development Code chapters 18.30, 18.84, and 18.92. . ri _ 999{{{ If t th i r 4 y ~h d T i K ~ 4 1 j 3 , . Staff Report CPA96-0003lZOA96-0004 Page 1 y . rF a- v k -,s„[' a - _z'v , } y t ,C S°.' r s < r - 5E t7- a' - 11- af .S -t S' - " WY 3- ' SI ywq ed -1111-11 ,,~,~-~",i",~~~,,~',-,",~~,~,'i~~,~,~','3'~,~~,,,, , LL ~ , -1 - ~ , , , - , J - - i a _ r F ~ k Mrh F , i° 0~ - s` a~ k? - r p _ 4!'4' 4'-' 1 - y - -A t { a~ - 4~y,, F" 3 i C h -fly ~J 1 - t r r s a t _ k l f y -'J 9 k 3 J' . t'+' , ~k M1 4~# M1 ~-f-1 a j~~- Ar'~- - a ~ -,s..aax.rf.-,u.~_, L.-.,. - r, «~5....ca v,~~!._....7~.-..a$..a"~.. a -~a...u...arrw#~..,.. L.uex..' a,s,...rtl'. 'r` x:cc 3^.b S r " i r a A .cam, f r r. i II. STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION £ 3° S, { - r ~f ' Staff and Planning Commission recommend that the City Council find that the proposed ~ n amendment does not satisfy all relevant review criteria and will adversely affect the ~a i y health, safety and welfare of the community, and that it DENY CPA96 0003 and e' , ZOA96-0004 as wo-o , coda. ~ Pla ring Commission heard this proposal on May 20, 1996 , and in a 6-1 decision recommended denial of the application as proposed. t , t Planning Commission recommended that the Comprehensive Plan and implementing ' code be modified to allow wetlands the same 25% density transfer standard afforded s, , ' 4 other physically constrained lands (e.g. 100 year floodplain, and steep slopes) for h _ ~ ' ` y ` areas zoned residential. Staff have since determined the following modifications in f, a „ language would be required to implement this change. This modified proposal would s Y? ! t i C t - J r-" Z i.- MEY3' ii, ~ add the following language to the housing section of the Comprehensive Plan added w ri Z ' x 4 F R language bold, deleted language bracketed): rt I M11 - N . , _3 K `The Tigard Community Development Code, through the Planned Development process, 4 , f shall establish a procedure to allow properties exhibiting physical constraint characteristics, ` 11,_ ; e.g., steep slopes, floodplains, or wetlands to develop with density transfers allowable on 4t ~ r ~ the site. No more than 25% of the dwellings maybe transferred." rt, ~ ~ r - y'rf~ Sfi~-fit? i fi.n and would modify Tigard Community Development Code 18.92.020 (added language bold, 4 ' I -1 1, ~ deleted language bracketed): x;E 1 . , r z " A. "Net Development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the - - - ~~~m- ~ ~ r following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the ' -~~U__ r } t c_.~ legal description of the property: } f ` : # { , I [1 1. All sensitive land areas: [i`~ r 1. k- ~ r _ , a. Land within the 100 year floodplain; r n 4 a~~ b. Land or slopes exceeding 25 percent• , ~ t i [and] 3 t,_ A - . t ' a Drainageways; and - t E d. Wetlands;" I I ` € - i 111. BACKGROUND INFORMATION € a Site History: I afi The applicant represents the ABECO Corporation who has an interest in 4.37 acres of land 4 i adjacent to Longstaff Street along Highway 217. The property is zoned R-12 with a # + r` _ ~ Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density. According to a wetland delineation x s conducted by the applicant approximately 1.09 acres are wetland. The city's current E Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code do not allow transfer of ' ` residential units from the wetland area to the buildable portion of the site. ' , ~ ,a V' . Staff Report CPA96-0003/ZOA96-0004 Paget - 1~- P £ - e Y r r ~Y r.S :°f SL F': f I 9 L - a F - y .x ids 4 _ R _ _ 4; , - ,tr E x k r i iq d. T - n! Y.. - - , x - - {~V.n..d.. - - - - _ - w-w.-. - - - - - i f . - - __~.s-L'-ate s_. n...~ -r., i _ `•i-> l --.._s.. _t z n ,[i . s...-.~ ...i.- -ffi._ s., *.,o__c.~.~s.., r--... .u._Z.... - l f 2 T, _ - " - . , . M ',e'W+A.Yr. i~€ Jai` } ,~S 4 Ur'~ - T£ L - 4i. t- - 5 1 e., ,asd,G.t ,_,%u_.w^t.«u..._.5 ,~.r c. - -~.v^.e»... ..?..,w.»- y..,... :.r r.... wssax i s - °.'_4 a - - - rye;: i $ ' Vicinity Information: r The amendment would be applicable citywide to parcels zoned R-12, R-25 or R-40 with z C wetlands. Staff has determined that, given existing zoning and the city's wetland inventory, , A). This w the proposal could apply to an estimated 77 parcels ..totali. y CreStc~u uun nn 785 u (r-"`"" t ~T ws , analysis is an estimate of the effect of this proposal, and includes all wetlands within the w x ` city's current inventory (City of Tigard Wetland Inventory 1990 and 1994). This inventory is = of a generalized nature and may not be an exhaustive inventory of all wetlands in the city. I Of these parcels, 20 are currently undeveloped under private ownership. Approximately c* 64.5 acres are developable and 21.5 acres are within wetland areas. With this proposal an estimated 307 units could be transferred on sites with wetland areas. k•- --1Q.`, 1. The modified proposal as recommended by staff and Planning Commission would effect an ' a estimated 118 parcels totaling 263 acres- An estimated 389 units could be transferred on m 2 , Y - . ' Z these sites. N The Tigard Comprehensive Plan does not explicitly exclude wetlands from density transfer, - ~ x J{ i s ~_s rz or are they included. Tigard Community Development Code does not include wetlands as rI r areas from which residential density can be transferred. Other sensitive lands including x , r s . floodplain, drainageway, and steep slopes are allowed a 25% transfer of residential units. - at e z r 11 I Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to modify }t~ ' Comprehensive Plan Housing Policy 6.1.1, Implementation Strategy 3 which currently rt ':01N ~ states: 21 The Tigard Community Development Code, through the Planned Development ` . ~ f } process, shall establish a procedure to allow properties exhibiting physical , 4 constraint characteristics, e.g., steep slopes or fioodplains, to develop with k BIPW , density transfers allowable on the site. No more than 25% of the dwellings may r be transferred." s ; ~5 - IMF, I -1 ~ ~M The applicant modified his original proposal which is contained in the application submittal , dated February 23, 1996. The modified proposal, contained in the letter dated May 7, 1996 ` rs{ r adds the following to Implementation Strategy 3: (added language bold): - " - " t ' X t p a x.L f ^w3- `To enhance the protection of wetlands on multi-family zoned property and € K k - M , to ensure the efficient use of multi-family zoned land, the Tigard 1j 4 s ,1151 Community Development Code, through the Planned Development 4 . t process, shall establish a procedure to allow multi-family zoned properties V ' ,1 I 11 containing wetlands to develop, with density transfers, to a density equal E E t to the entire parcel's or lot's zoned density." Community Development Code 18.92.020 currently states r y 'r ! (F ' ' ! ' A. Net Development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the - ~ < r following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the t , legal description of the property: ' ` . r 7. All sensitive land areas: t ' } r r 1 J r r C- i Staff Report CPA96-000320A96-0004 Page 3 - x „ f[,-" - t k d ~ I ' . , , , , , 1~ j :,-~~~""~'-,,,,~::,i"~-.~-'-, , , ~ { f t` f s ar ! -1 } t- Y - r L.__::- - I c , x I l " r f J - e - _ t i _ _ x. 1, -11 - F n k,&-- %zl P -EA $ ' in.'s - . ~ r4 s I `8 st " _r~i'1~-. ,dim i. - -1. 11 1' l•rf-t- ,£J _ i - - ~,~R' fey, X+ r.- tti X2' - -f' of £^"`7" f l a pi, " ' `,..f `y-- Y' e- va a.,., . ,....,~z _ > i ~ ir 4 ~ _IC limf i. ` I M , F° l Fs zap It , _ik 6C ~ti a. Land within the 100-year floodplain; ;,3 , Y, L, ! ~ a da.+ ' 4 Irt ~ 5 Y b. Land or slopes exceeding 25 percent, ~ y ~ ~ ~ W-~~ and x F . r^-=e - 1=, " t { ~ 'y„ > k s 4:,41 { C. Drainageways " b z- f', , r4 The proposed amendment adds the following to Tigard Community Development Code t ® -,11 . ! f x 2A3- kr, l ?X , X M,~ 18.92.020 (added language bold, deleted language bracketed): N F, r 11 x ~r x- 5 A. `Net Development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the [3"-¢t~;` following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the . . legal description of the property. d r - v i. All sensitive land areas: a eA -1 .4 W a, , ~ rg a. Land within the 100-year floodplain; z 1 b. Land or slopes exceeding 25 percent, aF _ ` d 11, N~,s~ ups t r r t [and] u _ fk s a a Drainageways and W, ~ x d. Wetlands" r j f The Tigard Community Development Code 18.92.030 currently states: "_r~t.~ . ` , k 7 A. "(Inns per acre calculated by subtracting land areas listed in Subsection j r h w". 11 18.92.020(A) (1) from the gross acres may be transferred to the remaining 5 x, 1, Ut, m5 T buildable land areas subject to the following limitations: ~ tr 1-1 1, 1. 5 , _ 1.. The number of units which can be transferred is limited to the number of units r x } which could have been allowed on 25% of the unbuildab/e area /f not for these~i xA ' regulations; r ' . ~ E ' 2. The number of units is limited to 25 percent of the total number of units which N + a 00.1^"5'r -of£3 could have been constructed on the unbuildable area if not for these regulations I ~ tll x j ° M r 11 - r ~ r and ~ r` - E y r 3. The total number of units per site does not exceed 125 percent of the x~4 maximum number of units per gross acre permitted for the applicable [ i I- I 11 comprehensive plan designation." r, e r 9:5 _ p = b. `All density transfer development proposals shall comply with the development r f r r i standards of the applicable underlying zoning district unless developed under the I'll _ ~ provisions of Chapter 18.80, planned Development. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52" f i E ti The proposed amendment adds the following to Tigard Community Development Code -,,Z7 ~ 5 A I D f 4 " ° 18.92.030 (added language bold, deleted language bracketed): ` r~ a ~ $ e ~ w F y iR \ Y 1 2 C s-, # # ? - Staff Report CPA96-0003rLOA96-0004 a Page 4 r ' 'O r t -i n~v + 1`~ - - sa+ rx - t.z r.'zn-' +~vn x'z^ fv x X p. f j,. I'll y rs TM ~ f f'' - E h - ,j - III 1111 d f s'+ 4 1 7 ~ t` 7 , , ~ - ~ . L ~~',-,:,..,--,~;N;~- ,~n~,QO~V', ~ ry _ 'a F- - -far y(.' ' z ,i ~4 '"'w, ask . x. _ C ,N , 12 :1 "I,,' 1, I'. 1~1 - a M T -}R~~y r 11 „ s a _ r E s d.t j 7 - . ' M I ""t il I II ~ W ~ z x- n i s-j ' -.a ~"`'F'-'^•.r., r~...r-ra*^mr---•-. i~- - _ .r+••+"rZ'?~^C en--- 7 _ t ~ 2 i a, t' - - - - - - h 4 .'.)tea ,-./'x - - - r'k"• F S 'Y i ' t w dr S - - _ - T j $ - vz 5 -yY Fly, k '49:-51 .+c.ut'c*.a.w.......ta~,..a._"..,..,.~s ..w....,.c...' _u....,__s_.: _ ~ .,.3...Au.r~ _,.__J- r Y _:t..wj...:r. r...a..,«",°..-:.°1S..s s L ~ 5 - - - sty F A. "Units per acre calculated by subtracting land areas listed in Subsection 18.92.020(A)(1)(A-C) from the gross acres may be transfer, d to w .11 ICNId1111/7g t . t r r~ u-wau/o 1a11u areas subject to the following limitations. e B. Units per acre calculated by subtracting /and areas listed in Subsection t ' ' 4A r , } 18.92.020 (A)(1)(D) from the gross acres may be transferred to the ` remaining buildable /and areas on land zoned R-12, R-25, and R-40 subject 9 $ ,fi to the following limitations: r f 1. The number of units which can be transferred is limited to the number of ; _ units which could have been allowed on the wetland area if not for these regulations, u.7.'d'~ ` I v,-t - I 2. The number of units is limited to the total number of units which could ° have been allowed on the unbuildable area if not for wetland preservation N` regulations; and ti nx,,. 3. The total number of units er site does not exceed the maximum >=~:'=`~~=yam ' number of units er p p gross acre permitted for the applicable l 1` ,,Y 3 t4 t xS t ,yo r comprehensive plan designation" I I [BjC. All density transfer development proposals shall comply with the ; 1 a development standards of the applicable underlying zoning district unless l _ ` developed under the provisions of Chapter 18.80, planned Development (Ord. t ' - 89-06, Ord. 83-52)- s ;3 ,i " SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS a 1 4' qJF~YYii ~ ip ' r~ ' STATEWIDE GOALS , x £ y tom,-, I __V - n~ Citizen Involvement: Goal 1 requires a citizen involvement program that ensures the y }{j --:V Y'S ? Y opportunity for citizens to be involved in the planning process. Tigard Comprehensive Y Plan Policy 2. 1.1 and Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18 provide for citizen r z participation and notice. Notice of the Planning Commission hearing and opportunity for _ ""i y F ' J b r response was advertised in the local newspaper and request for comments were sent to all 1 CITs, DLCD, and Metro. In addition, the proposal was presented to the CITs and their "I ['~-~~tl, comments are included with this report. This goal is satisfied. 2 [ I ry- 115 r I Land Use Planning: Goal 2 requires, in part, that adopted comprehensive plans be j ~"~r 11 11 ' revised to take into account changing public policies and circumstances. The proposal would fine-tune existing adopted and acknowledged comprehensive plan policy= r related to the transfer of density from physically constrained lands, specifically wetlands. k r t' This goal is satisfied. ' f i Open Space, Natural and Scenic Resources: Goal 5 requires that, adopted ~ comprehensive plans conserve open space and protect natural and scenic ' ~ j xresources. This application will not reduce the amount of protection currently afforded wetlands under existing regulation. The proposal would increase the potential density ' r ` _ adjacent to wetland areas. The applicant argues that the proposal would encourage the ~ s ~ ' Staff Report CPA96.000320A96.0004 t Page 5 w f k F ; m, 4 - - - - ' : ` - _ 1 M 6 1 / 1 Y' Y L _ 2 . E ) - f L S ."6 va fL ~'v-tom - J t e'. e L S') - - S Vii. 4 r t .1 t j y_ j 1 - - - F i _ - r _ , , . ~ , ~ ~ , 11 . I ~ L I ~ - 7 ~ ~ ; . " I . , ~ I - ~ , , , - J - - - - - - f -.1 'r'. t :_.a' .t_.r-~ -u. e.Y i:._ .:ft .a_-~~t c_....LL tx.. f _ - - - L 55C ~ t - 5 # - - - "RM ~~~a ~.x.f ' :.............',xr..~.,".~^.......,...i. '.5..........._.,. .....v_ _.~_,._...._....<Y...'f _.>.r.._-t a•_ .....:?w..~i..,.,..,...,,....s4'r."v, i a ..,euux m<~-- Y f preservation of wetland areas by removing the nagati~~g ; sso a ._:.b the Y'a~•" •anwU wild UIt3 IUSS OT density aiiocated to the wetland area. Staff recognizes, however, the potential for adverse { k impacts to wetlands by increasing the density adjacent to these natural features. The extent 4 TA { to which a 25% or a 100% in crease in density will impact wetlands is unknown. Staff, _ therefore finds that this policy is satisfied. ~ Air. Water and Land Resources Quality: Goal 6 requires that comprehensive plans maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources. The proposal would not have an adverse impact on these resources. This goal is satisfied. t Areas Subiect to Natural Disasters and Hazards: Goal 7 requires that comprehensive n µ rs~ s I plans protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards. This proposal 4 would not modify existing comprehensive plan or land use regulations that control lands i subject to natural hazards such as floodplain and steep slopes. This goal is satisfied. t Economic Development: Goal 9 requires that adequate opport unities for economic s development be provided by the community. The amendment could increase development opportunities on land adjacent to wetlands. This goal is satisfied. Housing: Goal 10 requires that plans shall encourage the availability of adequate numbers of needed housing units at various price ranges and rent levels and allow for flexibility of housing location, type and density. The amendment would have the potential of increasing the number of multi-family units which could be built on sites with " wetlands. For these reasons, staff finds that this proposal would increase the availability of #~w adequate numbers of needed housing at various prices throughout the city. This goal is x r- a satisfied. 4 Public Facilities and Services: Goal 11 requires that development be guided and } F 4 [ supported by types and levels of public facilities and services appropriate for the k needs and requirements of the area to be served. The city has adequate facilities and services available to serve existing Multi-Family land use districts. The city's public facilities r,4` plan would accommodate the density proposed by this amendment. It does not effect the C criteria that require adequate transportation facilities be available to serve these residential p land uses. This goal is satisfied. 1 " Y x yz7f z iY, µ t Transportation: Goal 12 requires that the city provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. The amendment would allow the ` transfer of density from sites with wetlands from the wetland portion of the site to the 4 x , : buildable portion of the site. It does not affect the criteria that require adequate t transportation facilities be available to serve these residential land uses. The amendment would not cause an unsafe and inconvenient transportation system. This goal is satisfied. j o Y 1 w. T Tl~ COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL OR STATE STATUTES OR GUIDELINES Oregon Administrative Rule: Section 660-12-060 states that plan amendments o which significantly affect a transportation facility shall assure that allow ed land # r- uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity and level of service of r ` the facility. The proposed amendment would not result in generating any additional i s traffic. It would not change or increase the density above that which was planned. All requests for quasi-judicial Comprehensive Plan map and zone changes for specific t Staff R ort ~ ' v` ` - f aP CPA96.000320A96-0004 Page 6 X rt r z y 4 ht g f i 1-Y r l - - - . - . - - _ z y property are analyzed and evaluated for compliance to transportation policies and rules, including this state rule. The city reviews all requested quasi-judicial changes for s compliance to this rule and makes a determination based upon that review. Findings of compliance or noncompliance to this rule would be made following a traffic analysis of < the specific proposal. This policy is satisfied. f COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES G, General Policies: Policy 1.1.1(a) requires that legislative changes be consistent` with statewide planning goals and the regional development plan. The findings: above address statewide goals. There is no applicable adopted regional plan. Metro was r 4 sr: sent a request for comments, and none were received. This policy is satisfied. , General Policies: Policy 1.1.1(c) requires that the Comprehensive Plan and the e' Community Development Code be kept current with the needs of the community. The 1 k~tf applicant states that there is a current need to increase residential densities within the b: k .a region, and Tigard to accommodate growth. Staff agrees that this amendment would promote a more efficient urban form and accommodate additional housing units. The a k applicant, however, has not submitted compelling evidence that policy should be amended to afford wetlands a higher density transfer standard than other physically constrained lands. Staff does agree that wetlands should be afforded the same density transfer. standard as other physically constrained lands(e.g. floodplains, slopes > 25% and M drainageways). Staff cannot, therefore, make a finding that this policy is satisfied. ` - Citizen Involvement: Policy 2.1.1 states that the City shall maintain an ongoing x r s citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an ,f r~ 1 opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. A request for 4Y qE s' c comments was sent to all City CIT individuals and the Planning Commission hearing was t z' ; legally advertised. In addition, the proposal was presented at all CIT meetings during May ' F k ? of 1996, and comments are included in Section VI of this report. This policy is satisfied. Natural Features and Open Space: Policy 3.4.1(c)states that the city shall designate, t in accordance with goal 5, the following as areas of significant environmental concern. (a.) significant wetlands and (b.) areas valued for their fragile character as habitats for plants, animal or aquatic life, or having endangered plant or animal species, or specific natural features, valued for the need to protect natural areas. € rt Policy 3.4.2(a)states the city shall protect fish and wildlife habitat along stream 5 i corridors by managing the riparian habitat and controlling erosion, and by requiring that areas of standing trees and natural vegetation along natural drainage course and waterways be maintained to the maximum extent possible; This application will not reduce the amount of protection currently afforded wetlands under C existing regulation. The proposal would increase the potential density adjacent to wetland areas. The applicant argues that the proposal would encourage the preservation of wetland r areas by removing the negative impacts associated with the loss of density allocated to the wetland area. Staff recognizes however, the potential for adverse impacts to wetlands by increasing the density adjacent to these natural features. The extent to which a 25% or a = 100% increase in density will impact wetlands is unknown. Staff, therefore, finds that this policy is satisfied., { F ( ~ t i ,1 Staff Report CPA93 0003iZOA96 0004 Page 7 % e ~!4 r.: . - T '1.y - .v._ _ 'r A..~..'c s-1_-.~ 1.~ a ~ iY _ Y:s. lam.. ~ . s,: . ~ - - . M7 ~ . , , , , . " ~ ~ ~ I , , " , ~ , , " 11 ~ , : I I r, - ~ ~ I ~ - ~ ~ ` , , - , 11 - r a• - ® 'zn r - Zi - - S - R y~ gk = ' - - ,w_...,...---'..~,,...~_e. x....7.+_...c _s_,_,... .»~z.,.._.,.'e- "S.dL.3 4:.e >w:- .n _,,,.~.°_Z,Z,,av{h`tl~*. _ k - - _ y k - y x r t - i - s Housing: Policy 6.1.1 requires that the city provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various prices and rent levels. This policy is primarily implemented through OAR 660-07, the Metropolitan Housing Rule. The rule a t .j . arAs the city maintain sufficient residential buildable land to rovide the opportunity for ~ , at least 50% of new units to be attached s rg!e family or multi family housing and to provide for an overall density of ten units per acre. A fi The amendment would increase the number of multi-family units that could be built. The " a ; t applicant argues that without this change Tigard would be below the overall goal of ten ;r` =r . units per net acre. The reason for this, according to the applicant, is that wetlands were not netted out of the initial buildable land inventory and the density calculation is incorrect. The _ ' argument is that units are being allocated to areas on which units can not be built or ;r'° . 4m) transferred. It is also true that floodplains were netted out of the buildable land inventory and that 70% € _ ~'F of inventoried wetlands within residential areas are contained within this floodplain 4 boundary. This leaves an estimated 30% of the inventoried wetlands that were not netted j- x~ out in the initial buildable lands inventory. Netting out wetlands is not critical to the density calculation. Rather the density calculation - - - A a v ' would only be affected if the area occupied by wetlands had a higher proportion of land WF zoned multi-family ( this would lower the overall density and percentage of multifamily) or if ' - r ~ 08 _ u a higher proportion of the land was zoned single famil (this would raise the overall ' Y density l''' and percentage of single family).The effect of not netting out wetlands can not be [ ' = ' } determined with absolute accuracy since the buildable land inventory used for the density `i, ! calculation is not readily available. An estimate of this impact can be made by evaluating , z` ~ f , the 30% of inventoried wetlands which are outside the 100 year floodplain. According to ` = r - _r existing zoning these lands would net 396 gross units with 47% single family and 52% , multi-family. This policy is satisfied. 1 Transportation: Policy 8.1.1 states that the City shall plan for a safe and efficient t R -T'- - ~t street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future r Z,S, !i ~ t s growth and development. The amendment would allow the transfer of density from sites t ' 'P 7 - 10 F with wetlands from the wetland portion of the site to the buildable portion of the site. It does } , not affect the criteria that require adequate transportation facilities be available to serve z ' these residential land uses. The amendment would not cause an unsafe and inconvenient W F transportation system. This goal is satisfied. 4 ~ -,4T t to k . COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: } Procedures for Decision Makin Legislative Chapter 18.30 establishes i;` 4 a procedures for consideration of legislative changes to the provisions of the ~ tx Comprehensive Plan, implementing ordinances and maps. Section 18.30.120 , lists the standards for the decision of a legislative change. The standards and [ x responses to these criteria are as follows: .sr~-y r y h 1. The statewide planning goals and guidelines adopted under Oregon r Revised Statutes Chapter 197. These standards are addressed in Section IV k - under 'Statewide Goals' in this staff report. f 2. Any federal or state statutes or guidelines found applicable. The state's = r N Transportation Planning Rule is addressed below under "Oregon Administrative - Rule". x 't s~j - Staff Report CPA96.000320A96-0004 Page 8 _ K-, E - R - ~,.*2. ~f Y y 5 l -1 n ) , +5-~,, ax =----ter'--us~c :ax.-,~„.Y,.s.-_. _ Z 'p~ " , L ,.'1z`r,_,`_.~, I I I r r . I : ~ ,r ,~,r'_ . ~ t I I ~ , ~ - F , ' Z ~ ' ~ - ~ r: ~ , - I , - , - ~ .1 J h r Z"'> ' r . - - u r t - 1 :_y , r 3 }l t . , ~ } 7 Y - y J - ' - k! '~k t. - fis a - ati r r d a* r t 7 ° k~ r Y i t t+ t ',yes„ -tP t t S S '4 "33+'a s - - - - - ' 4.. s°..s:...'..:-.`.`xa;,--L- a..'4. Y~.~. ' f-` _ -s - ks•: r wa..'sn--;;rav- - r . c'k'1'`f is a k '&4~~6M , ,,11 s s 41-1 s } 3. Applicable plans and guidelines adopted by the Metropolitan Service } rr F i s-, District. There are no applicable plans or guidelines adopted by Metro.x w . 1; ; ~Y l 4. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and map. These standards are 3;' hh _ addressed in Section IV under 'Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Policies' . r u in this staff report. t ~ ' ......,:-inns of the implementing ordinances. The t # ' _ - ~ v X d s = ; ?;:r-; ; : S. The implementing appiicable provi ordinances are contained in the Tigard Community Development _ , - =,-K,r Code, which are addressed in this section of the staff report. l~~~""~ ~ - w 6. Consideration may also be given to proof of a change in the neighborhood d - F , 4 ~c or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or z r m" x~,- Y^ implementing ordinance which is the subject of the application. 4T F a, The applicant has satisfied this code section. It is satisfied because the first five - ~ ~ <r,i N', standards have been adequately addressed in this staff report and the sixth ,,4 n c standard is optional only. z y r Y - R- SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS z 7, .,yy " ,,~r,~ ' No Comments ~ 4t * t,s ` r 4 SECTION VI: OTHER COMMENTS k f , , _ % The Engineering Department reviewed this proposal and suggested that transfer of 5 } density also be allowed from the 25 foot buffer required for wetlands. The Building ct i < $ Department reviewed this proposal and had no comment. 1 The CITs have reviewed this proposal and offer the following comments: No written ~ ~ { comments have been received to date. The South CIT heard the proposal at the - $ 'i I meeting of May 1, 1996. The members expressed concern that this proposal would~~ have an impact on existing neighborhoods. (Note: the applicant revised his application r y = M r to only include land zoned multi family after this meeting). The Central and West CITs - ' ~ ~ , 1 heard the proposal on May 7, 1996. The members questioned revisions which would 4- ~ allow more density transfer from wetlands than other physically constrained lands. The - ~,4~`~ , . - -11 ,'~u,.W East CIT heard the proposal on May 8, 1996, The members supported the concept but r felt that applications should be reviewed on a case by case basis, and that there should F a -i ,Y - ` , : { f be no guarantee of 100% transfer. ~ G~ ~ ~ G ~ W. %I.°6 e% Mav 28. 1996 " = ~ 4 x PREPARED BY: Nels Mickaelson DATE t - i Associate Planner xs } , 4 f , f a - i ~C~ May 28-1996 I t !n J C~Ln_ -y APPROVED BY: Nadine Smith DATE f - p I Planning Manager r € r " r f - K L 'x xx 1 3 I:VtDInM01f1CPA9G03.ec y 4f,* 4 S 1 Stall R ort CPA96 0003lLOA96-0004 Page 9 ~ * k ~ , 'q - r - 2 - r , a....-.,...,~.c c,;.-r., x"~'`;-r< - `^s:l - .~.:.n- <-:,i ,~a,..,'~~. iPi7'i"3.:2 + w.* x'~~. 'e. ++l4g + - - 1 - ! F M 7 a ti - - _ r x- s k r r , _ r - r V -47,- 1 ~y~-- ~ i _ - - - t1- ~ Il - q 1-W`- py [ 31 ✓C x t a i - tCj _ - Y G- u . , ~ - . a , El-~-'- ~ I . ~ . - -m ` - - i .._.~~iM1a t.__I. ..C._ - ~_'I_ Si. _L-_~J fie - ':=i 'G _ ~~A3' 7P r 4;. tip. v'' ,:.A,. r~+,~ •'7 7 ::•ir'?".°= ~W~.,,.., ..wr,. % r, < s r sM' L .•P •4Y" t''fl... ',z•,* .t nil.. '',p fi r>, a`; ,i.s + , .t :rt.,.:.... v ",..,w. ~ _.:,'Uh •?r Y 4q .,i,.~r-, .s., psi. . .t:R1't ,>7.. .nc: +yx<• -f.. ,r,3,eN.. ?3,' 43'~'r. .u.. i. 1 'J:, § n, tx k r J:r',1+ A°, ><i ii.',, a.)i me'.tMxr". ,`aj •a . (i•:.- _ tiY;'r, . w-., -f +~"a ..r;•.J t.,,:. :•.i+ ds' • k xr „a~;.•r s,,, n}j, , , > *.n.',:`,r^v ,,,"ss, .r ~ .ry) , 'r •a. »t r "`'K' is ,v,A <fi •n o =k*-w_: 5 KL .f R-" r4i ,x p GA . Y • i .i. { ~ ~ a ~ aw", •Jr' per : s t t 5 , .:4r ~1 ~snf a, .F!? t €~t 'i., v ~e -'P ,x , + d !•`F" .F `'"-,tFix!.,,.. ,~:SCS£ z r7'., J. =E k Sf i r -4 t' r Y its i ` b,- :,y -r i' ~ t. '„+r- ..,.r.+.:: .E.-, ut`fr,r~sx•;t ,;;.,I,Y ~..~t: tzI -1 f tf d ~ ! ~ '~YY ~1 +y IY`~''~j5"1~~ it +'~P rvl ;'d ,>'L st k h a t~ r' trl t NZ''1T~,x~ f `yik, d lr a 1 `t,, =i t+ f t r"r`,~tiF`t C~ 4 f "a^ p ~ JP { - t I I~ E 3 f E f N' Jd] k- ry F~ p at ~ + L / ~ v 's a a w I ~ B $ _ its Ff 5 f fi ' 3 kr . ! 5 ~ - f 10 t J4 s t 1f I - ! '7 ~l2 _ I~ ~d t 1; ~ ro i I~ .y t ~ t 5 , t r i 2 p 'O 1 4 4 Ft - L ,jP'r J "tN^s" tk. f r.J' t 3v I ,F t, h? d t i'f dt yd v' . rF d,r ,•s+ s v, 1 s 'f. {N J . .sd „3'A 4 a ..sv' C'° !t 6 '4` ei.' }.,Y~t: f 1, ,P u 't .,vat"~ , P°. , .°fP df'•, ! -f -y~ J" CF Te •`C., .t<{}i rN~t ,L, ,«LS'k'w µJ [ f^ . it ''✓•,r`T+ 7' „ tv'• rT,'~{ ~ rt t f 'a' ~ , r >5 y, r q v'`X cr 51 4, jxk ,k `i'J••~~- T, -na'>Y~'"£s.,.9. b~"'w,F._.-.;;,:5',rr.•,-;.*, r.,.,,,:: a k~ 't' fa. 'i' , k :2v 3 fi~ ~f ~.s, 4` XR~ IN, ~g '.ls. F d _5, "T• .41., d~~ `tu.% ~ ~~4 1, f,.~ ~c '„tr rt ~5; "<P ~ Y S+^' , r 7 a ash 'e r ' >-h+d iY°' ,.-C J: c ~ FY' h xr'. 3• .',Y, n vvt' t' 9,.y[ ~r?•. , k` 'PYM ,N ,5 . ~c•, w "6•.1:vJ .'AP'n ,rb v ,.Ju ,r. "r'?N t g4%+ti"k 3- ~ t} 15. ~:`wr , V . .p.•., =s x,„ :S ~r i„ ^f"r. k.r zrwi""s ..f ''4 1•:rr .~:,~'~+i,^. 1"~. ° r ro s~~ wt.*'Y ~ ~ `fix e•^t:- r, f.- d.' nd+:,vi~; rr , a-~.t ^,r - . ii;~ ..`n,'. , s ns • '..rs . '~~?'.~~ta: rx.h-,, '+.W ~ . °~~i~'.~.,.' v, , ! a v. r", 5} „k• c 4c ' u : S r. vy,- E'.,'g; + :tc;~."~r .en,, .,.3.:Y„:' t.. .rxS.~k, rS t' r r. r. ~ .,x . :'i £ _ , ra .tr,.r°f :.w',c 'T ~,y 6_, "s- s~{ sa' +.,.d .'(t1 ,.t >.~,.`^~,+yro, s t --rv'•~#• t nmi l-v r"i". - ,'F.4 ~•°'.6""' »:#•n ,1~r?,. .,5 ..x•frs=, r~4, 1. a;%~• ..m= ,.,f, , I + >n~ ? Str r. a•s t 'x . 'd %`fx~ t af,; .p,Y- "rv.•,r. .~rx`''° •+2"" ,:-ct:, 'viR. ,~v, ~ . 'fir v -"~5 w~+ c:, r. 1`' , { s5,-4' ,•a , t.',it;. r°'Rv4`ry iy. .ns .1~''vs^i' ,V'' i J yf.x 41 Y,:".`~:., 'e.}' , ;1, i `yy,:,,: r, 4 -f' °"~',zr nitie ^t 'iSP ti_'44•$" R,.x. ~f,Y. .,3 .n 1 J~. 1 ~~~1. .='w'WL+::,': 1 Y~s ,.,td! - ,h .x,.n'.<., .:"a N., +a-rT,]zv v'~i.,,p, a..C' ,_-'vr.'h^r I::I':. _ f Ya': ! S { N f ! i « _ 13 go- pI¢~ 2 L ~ f r f .ci - !J p:~;H f..= rl ! ° '.S:I7 S 9, G I a ;jl~ t ' y _ r , ;J, I , : ;;o- r } .'I~ ~ ~:4 I kg f-~,a b I tt ti'aa. ~ i R ;,.~d H f I ! • fu m ~ c tie- i~' "an •'k~'i _ a a' n a3 ' 4 ° S.~y-whr 4 Mf. x ' r gym, -My ,t~ r'i+^ J~ .rl ~ Nw~. "r S '•,udL ,g*:az fsf t<,m'-'° ,,.zSr'v'.d t +•~,Sx n v£,.' ,.'3 ,,,r~ ..i ~f k:T,+,t:s o'k,,:r ,ik". r'wi):+> iG.a~1 t,. _ 1 'ems i~~ ~J' t~~f-'-.`~. .k'' 'P x 9 • ,~rx-""""'MFR"' oa.4. ...t '<'a; r•z .A~ . ~s .,ra• xa W d b j a C h'.l J ;'k' 9 'Y L: " d: rv„1h. r kJ '.V p .L'- +S~a u,Bfl i .,ry•r'.•~i . k "a t di`. •^fN. i.` . -I ' iF iu4 ^S m. } 'F r. -5 "'61 :tf' q ~p~ _ ✓ . e c .';'o-S~°H~ k e .§:^:,•T iRx fi .v_ k. '2X`.YI:, x t „td .a . , pM:. .C -y-Y. Y:. yi' .'3 `-"v " ,v,+ r. Y ..n nr~ I* ryt, f^R -,i d'b~' ka'- ,l rt v. V$1': 3,s•1•}"-. „+C•"NK $ .r, '°i ~ , ¢ f7 E*a ,e'^ s. "i ri : a r6'~4:" 4 C" -•i"t~+~a~ 4 r~ - i...,U • f? - a*~a a- ry w? .,.:rw. ".s', ,x • ,,r .sS"a.z a:vLe-' I:. - .'S` ,.«:t 34<A-: ~vaw',}. R, ~4,-d'" „r„ k- y53. "^a ;'fir,: 'R•.~ .:~..E r: ' C e : 3"~5`r''; ?ro,a:-,., a ~""3." ~.w~^""-,• r, .a- <"aS.,~~ n,, ~r wn3 °a~~, -F ,ritx, ra's. .."xi ~~iJo .'"~''a r• .r', X14 .'R%f`,~, m;ar., r~'` vY k5~' q kv' r R, ~f a t; yY=, n.i we wq%: °'S,y„~~,.. ,.r Y,7 YI A4',~ x.k ;;yr-•+ .t 5 ur'«'..- i r s~'•' a' ~S~'' f tF • ,.,y',,F°~ °~kc r ~,'r t.. «..'^R`' •1d. t; _'edv'(R ,.P-Lr'` +P+, 'F r, ;k" k. .,r, ,u; n'xz 41'` G ~ ; ,~q~~~ r . i'rk' ~ » ~ 2. v . -r,f~i°. ~ , a , •s' i:~, ~t ~ ~ . ar , r~;a't_ t •„fa 1 , r'a>, 5'& tx~.g M.s sari *:i . , ~ ' ~ 't~ , 4, ~ r ""t + ,Y "-~,'c x ~'r. ..nr. ~ ,I 'asr' ",~.t „Y".X "f - , ..,s'. r P ' P+zASr:.: r',`,_,a-,,s fr z ti-""wr j 3 .i 4~~'.^ 3 „M,<=. +t•. ^:N`'^ r. '7M'm,,.> „C.C~.'rx. e. `r, ~3~ ~"t~ tv.,l,.,, y .2'h''" xn''an* I @ :w'a`'~ 9 a.»+b ,a•.',r t- b -.f,,~" rt'"~. ;g~~ 5,u ,d ^fira'' "44N"'kC • Z S „S r Sn: -'1 s' 4 w+ h°JM d Yg 'r'.b:'3-m rxl, `:x z ,''RY R .,,;j'h-a. r .3'.,;`:n 'if.;~. `3y.`a1,'e ,.Y„y.Y" N.: i<'xt-. :•~t p y .r4.x:2 P. ^ 2, :nW y"4,,A B.°`,°.' '!1', etr. r'r+. a'.~'''b a,y{'~:"~f 1 ^'~'f4sa z.'`+vc :•xv,."^' rw _ r:4 ,'a, r+4r.,. _ 'h""' i v, 'i k fi. ~ . .>t r , ~ c?^'"t+',"=}°`a -t4 ;:1« •z' ~ , n Ea", r iA~.' R 40-0, ~5`.d `.wt 1 dr ~ •4 ".f„ ^'rG," .r; t:r.. «.i... r ,x. .y.v 'e'7"~' .•3'~ ai< ,°»r,» ..f;• t ,au. ~ Px~ r.,Ss a.:r*a'h'a; ,~f. tf"9 •5~ ~W 1~: 'W ~,°{e:,. ,y,•}Sr,`a .~t'N: ,Irk. .'1 • ' ~ „5,4' ¢Si.: :'i : v 5., Y ~ 1eu E 4'^ Fi ON, M' 4 Y .3• i. rE war ^ft'a" ,.4.4. '+r•~, a,r.. .w•r , 4x'. Via.. .`F •'3 a. •R•+ _ ':t a-,Lai 'aTr£ • 'z F{. 4`" zV_ air, •4 Ali'. 2 .a Y.nY ?L2"< ..f. ea .S;U`: rYi'i ..~}°'$r ♦P` ~9JJj ',,-'V S' .'"_.5'^' .-Y.V"-t'U" 'i~^ S! .r°•~ r*s~v^ ~ xd r7 x „x ,P act yy 'ri:9 Kt a`C is G7 p , ta` . •t'"'• }pct h A`'~'a ,t•Vse 1 'S' ' ~ T _ ~y e F~ y," ,'fir, .x ~j~~ If I :4'.is 3 T}'' ~ta, . -•~r 3 4° 4 x R „'L- 4. .fir',? >y$,± a ' iTM~ ,f _y •X, tz, bar .5, . ~ ~ 4i"a F<- RL rt:: f` "w.a^hk4aLc tr$eWaA .;:~g `k':,'e h ~i: v+ t-t wx,;;, 4r /T i. k,1.,¢.'r •x R~r 3 •`y?'iF` ~"g-t"~'F•R ~ n i esi+s x y ~ ;t1::. '.i~S'i i;~i ..-°_L /x rtE.13' •>R•? ,p .i'+.' 1, PG 3 ' r e > I "t / 'aF` +•"'u ~ 5a =k~r~,t~~=r# , zit 1,~ 7 use x aR - r c 4a`, dl;a ry Ifr,;_a ~`-',fir fix "ct u£J *r1 ? x-5i.; xr'al lJz~,Y ^r y' AN I, k Pi»' I Y p frc t+:lj 'r t a'^- s Z - ,.xFC' ~z'' 1':r pY~ ~j'nf" 1 i k urSY ♦ ~r an k t }row 3 Zv✓ y 1 1 W ¢ 09i Way t I; -0. A-00-5K Ww- I-W E r- ♦ r Ft. r A .r t E ~ 1ti i r r t. 4 r f' I + P r n d' fl i lei! J ~t ti ! Y ~T 3 ` f 17 t ~ Z ; it ~ r a 1 r 1 r 1, f „1 t S L E t t i I 4 OUR f ! § -i. mail - g j My memo W w? W it Ina. F.- Jag E~w~ 1 S I t man- r~ P - ~7N S~ , py ..yk z MZRAW'm SIB J Y ~ t if t", ~ ~ ¢ 4rT ~`~Yr 3J 5 r e r ~ I =5 - a ; t ~Y 4, a. f' ~ 2 t f~ ~ ~ ;rc{a S iA r f F ~ k ~fi r i J I f'rs --{r,-~ v x . r t# 1 r. l i - r § ri' ? d. x{ a is d r 3* rt'~ Crt ,t F r 3 F - - x'- e C ~ z Y i K'° [ a d ~Q,dR r. • y, w g' r ~ "t5 ,r-~F~aP a a*a~ t" ~N 5 MAk ~ df+ 1 1 r; A? ? {Eag 3 adE Zr~`'~k k4rE 4'k}{a'x-1,-yu.>i _ 1 II } 9 4 l" rl t "a „T }a-k, r k- T" z 'fib t i-t SL .a .~n,~F. _ 's '„,s .i: %u ,r a~`'r.:~'F,~y,.;,4.,f`3,x,,r'd., 44, ` - •'dd3v' x}, ..:r4 "1 y;l,,. !:a;,'i•,• 4 :bx,ea , . ,w,. .:rY:r:..., A.:¢x-.x " .rr,r , - .-a+u', a' u,, a``s " . s.+t, i">,:s>!s . :~..:TS-..r.~-' eik• :!i:> M-.y. „ m, •-i - .~t. ,arr- E, ~ - 4a ,i. ` rya.. , ~ . , a .>t eti=t ~ ~ i' C 1 ..{,t `,;rl ~ F,:c .,r-'..~a ~"r.~' 2 >:.,"-+a '".n_~5 :c a:h~ '3. ':syC' a"R''r• ,x' Y ~<•.i'~..... yi - ~ .i t°~,-"'F~ 4~SMl.: .,.f: :ate ,:,».,fi +c.,,, , . c...,._.-, „ -.x ~ i ^n.~" " 'r''e : 1'•a.: rd.';,.•>-.r . ' ,r'., r +a:,.'. Fk• y ate- : [;v}+'" ,¢y~«) d:rrf*. .~1 , ,r. , _ .1~,*t t •r4d1~--+{`~ ~L:' ~ M x?. : x. - , < rx ^.:...a!~: sa. ..a s.' ~~`-P' r . ?N vk, r'ry,.' '.j> r T.,• x.~ ±t . rrA :"a `";s ~ "~r d.. ,'w , a^r, .:trig. I. ^i,s~ .,:,d at. 'a<` Y°='fx,','z`' ,.z. a~ ? r4 1,., •P y •:,~,'"3` - aY 'a.... , , [ ".n~'' "fan - 's ' ~~~~i f ,G d - ~r"•1t Fad ~S as ,a'~e«~~, t »1,, . at . < .rr ..Y - - k , 3'•^i,,.^_, ,.tt "fin. "irc '°'Sw Y. !X' S ..?E,+ ' 5l 4.7 R3wR ,].,U NA 4 t ~ u ~a-.>s , i.l x t ~r trtr## , . -"F ' ~a " , , K ~.rr a' s^ ` r, 2% , qY r 'SF'" i- > t ~r . .m.~a":.: i w 1r ,`s v r v ` "'rv - 5~~. s d mr ,R ate'"S,i~ ' t.'. -"'_~"5^Y,.r ir:v`^ H";irv':a,F~';>i. :4","' „Rr a~. ~4 ~ ~.,!.'sryv'~.,,''"e{ tf.;?`,',,~t'.v as .>d ,•"+'xn";. .K .,.•r-'•wr.. Al ~s,Y ~''"~tat°~ k¢~..,. b~•' '5>.~ ":F, ~ 'a t FfSr""'r, a- tt ~'`l, a >n,:Z, ~'.ri f yy'.w "r :a 4G r w aka , ,y y s > c,'£,s. r r : , , ';;,r~'`rrsa~xs 'j.`$ S :k'.' .,r`. •'ii -'Jn °rw ~4` },~E 'r kn - 'v`RZ ,?,•'[.a$_„..~ 4'~x~~.'~~t:R",.- ti.' '',.:`t, rr„,RS`~'++;zai~ •.1,'°t.'r~ ~a.v ~T~a.a :`•FYw,.~ '~,a_ "r # rY'-'~,u~ .'~T-,y•v ,xi ,I.f'~`~.;`~}.".a` d »`'.g ;;Y.. x''., '3 .u', „a,•s,, ,w. ,.'~,...:,',.al,.: ar 'a?r,t, t A . E`*r,s ~ib-.lr-:,: , .'''k~i'•- .P' ,g', ,a+a t; b r w r,=r d ei;'`,.,f ,.dd+ . Tit- k , a.~? s ~a , s a,~ar~*~;;~`;,`°k '.t`Y# a,,.~ ~ , r ~ ° Paa :.4. ~ w .~w ~ ~ .x , -c..~3' ; - 'ai`v e ,'t`y`x.'c~,~. ;`f.,~ t. i*''"~ ~.a" .a-~.,;.~«'~t+ r la ~~$~'•s.'z, r', i .`t»x» a.. n i f ~ - tip- s=a2 y, , ,Xyfx ~ v=r;, v , t•' - ,v~5i ~ d4~ .rb n %t~~~ "~:N ',~g9ib E ~q,x ~~a f..>^~ ~ ;k ~~"=.,ti~'" ~ ,-^-Y',, .eg a, s;aa:~ as . r ,a.. wc, ~ F,, {F"'_ «9,.. ' ~.'FL +1 s«:y~ ~ a .~r. ~~';,~~.a~ac .b u,~S, 4r~S' -v` ~~ar,^i$'s4~r a.'u~'°:n._` yLyei. - ~ r •w t $✓T ;%R, 1 _ Sr'' a ,,'a,.r~t< a~~,, !s L a S,.,x Cr ,.3t.L• ` ^I' gs - ✓v ,.',i.`^~g~ a., a'~. s''.1J'e ' ~ ' , a I Nh;73 a ~x ~E > r, ~,A~n .syr,. G ` ~~ccC.,,; , r 7~.';,vy. . ~cx~, ~?~'e R.'n .f~ - i"3t.~ '7' 9 +„~„S.};','.~ ~~'~'~`yf L. " ~ ~r~f'~jf ;>f.: f .i,"`;~,.~,. ^~ra ,r sr„« L4~''r4 v; a~. .I' -a: ,~~'ht$' .;~,.t..~5-~." ,~4 ~,j~++a~..x• r~ _ .,Sa,,: H''-,;~a' ,'''s'' ~i, 5?, +x.>~, iY.. '7z .`r.F k'r=+": ',~,?u:. .~s-rt,,a„,,, - ;z.~.,t • bra::~y°'~_n:^`,.e.;a•'~u`a•:,l:n,rt..7; .'-•~p:s;~*,L,~~.'". t:.:,,.;, 'f^ ✓ r 1 i "Tr`t' Ts 7 f^-r.'- ct "'^''r ?n '-•I'r •r'.m '-is "'Car=' r rt ern TT^~S' s , l i.N t[ J t i S ,1? ~J"_ Fs o'Si$ {..arl ® I r t' v i r 1 t VII r,7J f~ + F4 f ) 1 I x f rt ryiF y t J, c, , : c ~Ir7, , MIE I # t cat - - i _ :r3 7- -ra - t 1-- wi-"; M ~~,~.,~?,'Y~~i,&,,t!,',V,~ii~~~,5~t-~~,~,,~~~ w, i, k iz;;" I ~~"'I ~ f.- , 1 '---~~qi.11:111' - r 'c _ r . t .;'~II 4 ~ SF^"` t - - t s x 7= s z{ _ ~~y z _ ~;s;` p#e - ° - r . - _ 'i-'--s _ 1' W-ii et c a c - ' -t t - - i -ry - - k~ Sam-a -x - ,t,s S A" 1 . z` r- a o f x ; r; y 6C'a 0;~ OR t ',~t ~ Agenda Item: z 1 1- a I 1 = ~,-1`~ v" t Hearing Date: June 11.1996 Time: 7:30 PM ' Q-M r1$ -9 I .1 ~ _ \b v. § _ _ 'S 'fit - ?'et^ '"3:r.§ z%`~„'.V;R=. -11 -~Ii , W4 ;n t.'s' -,a : STAFF REPORT . uty - c of Rs ' y xs4 TO THE CITY COUNCIL;z ` F F FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON = ~TM1 °i - '.W"...' ' -#t h "%c 5-tom + I 0 5 IAATALI CI IAA\IIAnV 5,} - t~°k'" - I. firl~LlliMilV1`~JVIYIIYI/1171 ~f- - fie°--~ a'. w lk7-> "'"f-, a' } , 1 # "fit - _ a _ t t{t~syx - j k f N -'fir - " - + iii - 3 CASE: FILE NAME: ABECOJCox 4 t r ~ 3 ' ' Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone Ordinance Amendment "'1 -~u~ K ° a r ~~b _ ' s-, CPA96-0003/ZOA96-0004 i X; 4 r . PROPOSAL: Amend the text of the Housing section of the Comprehensive r ? 1-1 ~ pr Plan by amending existing policy as follows: 6.1.1, e x Implementation Strategy 3 - add language to allow 100/a ~ F ~T r 11 " transfer of density from sites with wetlands which are zoned R- x - - 1- r 4 p2, R-25, and R-40 from the wetland area to the buildable an I,t- 3 ortion of the site. The application also N'N.~~ M.- ~ "'W~ c 'M Z ~ x - amendment to Tigard Community Development Code x 40 `1 18.92.020 to include wetlands in the list of sensitive lands from 4 ,s, ?a t 'k 5 , ° ~ ~ ~ ~ which density can be transferred, and 18.92.030 to allow 100 PJ x4 percent density transfer from wetland areas zoned R-12, R-25, + " 01 ~ r and R-40. t .a.~~-- L APPLICANT: William Cox 71-jg,,v K i r u~ ; "r 4. r _ 0244 S.W. California Street Portland, Oregon 97219 ti f t a c V1Y;1 Pt1 `€r y OWNER: ABECO Corporation ' ,R ' ~x ' ,t 6205 S.W. Carman Dr. ; g~~i ; P' " ` + Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 j ~ ' r~Y , , ~ i ZONING , ~i".i ,-"g': s rQ6 ; s, z 4 DESIGNATION: NA , . x ~ ~ q - h ~ ' LOCATION: City wide k - _ js?iT' x, Inc, `11- I - 'n r a ~ APPLICABLE r~ ' s - TM REVIEW x °t I, 1 f' 3 i ` s r ti iL CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Tigardr x Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.1(a), 1.1.1(c), 2.1.1, 3.4.1, 6.1.1, 8.1.1; Tigard Community k ~x r?' . Development Code chapters 18.30, 18.84, and 18.92. r to a ~o--, Est _ - _ - t»t'J § 7+-~M.. t 11 - 1 r : Staff Report CPA96 000320A96-0004 Page 1 t Z11 -'L1 x i-- t r as7 r ,~.~•.,amr.>r i z^, ~an~ ' n -^..°e'~r .reax r:,x.'.~" r ~%";r- 4' i' 8. 3 J ss `,.s""'t to t u -•t1 i n - s ql~, ,,,F - I 1 z rsyl' ) kh , a , " 1 UT", ~ - - , ' ~'~"'i - _ : r - , , 0 ' S - rH Q- '-,'~xa ,ter' -r~~`S -sr - - f r' ! "'~`-r 'r'`7' Tt e~ f- r a-a~ r s,r k -rat -r s _ 'fir -~*~s ~J #a a _ I' -i _ y ,ya - x -M , ~ ' _ L , e _ - - ; 3'4 x,Sx t h t _ - - _ _ t _ - d - sA1 - _ j -ff_ --k f S 5 G alt-- r t- "dam; .us-a~,~,.xx.,:~. •,..,.,~..z~.a: - } J d - 4Z.. y-. f L -v S T1 .~°s ky,-. --F- ~ y~4 11. STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ~ ~,F}, f+ r.'C '~;2,-,:54 t ~[~F~, I - i)t_ ~„r' z-i•~`.Ssk~.. Staff and Planning Commission recommend that the City Council find that the proposedF nk h amendment does not satisfy all relevant review criteria and will adversely affect the , ,4 health, safety and welfare of the community, and that it DENY CPA96-0003 and C -t ZOA96 0004 as proposed. Planning Commission heard this proposal on May 20, 1996 P 7 and in a 6-1 decision recommended denial of the application as proposed. L F ~ ~ Planning Commission recommended that the Comprehensive Plan and implementing , s k code be modified to allow wetlands the same 25% density transfer standard afforded a •t a uj ~,I' =g,..:1- other h sicaii consiraiiEnd lan~s ic., Inn voar flondplain, and steep slopes) for > x,, V° ° areas zoned residential. Staff have since determined the following modifications in~> - ' , language would be required to implement this change. This modified proposal would y~ add the following language to the housing section of the Comprehensive Plan(added language bold, deleted language bracketed): s Y ~x ti I The Tigard Community Development Code, through the Planned Development process, r , M1 . s shall establish a procedure to allow properties exhibiting physical constraint characteristics, r A - % e.g., steep slopes, floodplains, or wetlands to develop with density transfers allowable on3, the site. No more than 25% of the dwellings maybe transferred." i Lk W y = 5 and would modify Tigard Community Development Code 18.92.020 (added language bold,` a } r, t deleted language bracketed): # 2 .1, r i if 'b t~ S r A. Net Development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the r ti- . ~3++ following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the c ;-F legal description of the property: 5 y r 1. All sensitive land areas: - - t r ; a. Land within the i00 year f1oodplain;i3E [ b. Land or slopes exceeding 25 percent, I PF s [and] eft ' K4 r ~a o- ° rG ,d c. Drainageways; and 1- x"5 r 1 1-11- X. WIA.1~1, I .11 r d. Wetlands;" _ ! ta „ - ` ``r ~ 7ks t s_ 1, :o ii,*~ 111. BACKGROUND INFORMATION x E E~ , f L a'--- ia`t F` . Site History: , , ~ ` The applicant represents the ABECO Corporation who has an interest in 4.37 acres of land f ~ ,j G k adjacent to Longstaff Street along Highway 217. The property is zoned R-12 with a 3 i Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density. According to a wetland delineation ( , 417 , °SF E conducted by the applicant approximately 1.09 acres are wetland. The city's current Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code do not allow transfer of ~ z M residential units from the wetland area to the buildable portion of the site. r } F i r , ` Staff Report CPA96-000320A96.0004 Page 2 ~ x r - ~.o 1 xti s~+z,:. - ;as ~;-c•r.:a wr»„w, ,„.tir ww.r--.,. f _ t•• t x c, 5 - Fa , i-.v TA F ~ # r _ r a _ t i s .t s E r r *tF - - - r z F rr,l wz \ + L 1 E :J r 4wS - -11 Y - Tm3 5 - - Y \ 4,, 8K C .t Y$` JJ' E M1 F , , I - . , , ~ _1 ~ o , ' ,r _ M S 3 L ~r: „ - - ' - u.~ 'T'rI._1.~ ~.,.rv " -----r-^^: ~-"i'~I.- - ~',".~'_~^^'.4'T `z° -'ti' -{.--iT~-~~~ n: . _ - r 1 t -1 'X- # Y i - .53ka - t r ,11; . _ ,._.„-,w~.- _:_.k-... s..>u.~,.....c.~ gas.v.KSS~.aLx..uu.,u%od,~.~.,:~_- _ ~--47 _ 1t 2., f~ ~ Vicinity Information: ; f 1 The amendment would be applicable citywide to parcels zoned R-12, R-25 or R-40 with 4 ri 111 . ice' wetlands. Staff has determined that, given existing zoning and the city's wetland inventory, _ - , the proposal could apply to an estimated 77 parcels totaling 195 acres(Exhibit A). This ` , x analysis is an estimate of the effect of this proposal, and includes all wetlands within the g city's current inventory (City of Tigard Wetland Inventory 1990 and 1994). This inventory is F, of a generalized nature and may not be an exhaustive inventory of all wetlands in the city. i Of these parcels, 20 are currently undeveloped under private ownership. Approximately ` _ ?t= ,x;, . ' , ` A ,'r ° "°z 64.5 acres are developable and 21.5 acres are within wetland areas. With this proposal an > estimated 307 units could be transferred on sites with wetland areas. x .1 I { s I :;f The modified proposal as recommended by staff and Planning Commission would effect an / 1 r..., oc~ nrcc An estimated 389 units could be transferred on - estimated 1 16 parcels totals Ly 263 - these sites. ~r ~ 7r The Tigard Comprehensive Plan does not explicitly exclude wetlands from density transfer, or are they included. Tigard Community Development Code does not include wetlands as areas from which residential density can be transferred. Other sensitive lands including xw z ~_IgL,, floodplain, drainageway, and steep slopes are allowed a 25% transfer of residential units. I xf"~f ,-Z Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to modify ,}x~4 Comprehensive Plan Housing Policy 6.1.1, Implementation Strategy 3 which currently , l f ~r } states: ,s t if - - 11 "The Tigard Community Development Code, through the Planned Development r ~-K~._ " K process, shall establish a procedure to allow properties exhibiting physical x ` a, _ constraint characteristics, e.g., steep slopes or floodplain, to develop with 11 density transfers allowable on the site. No more than 25% of the dwellings may v 1; be transferred." N 1- L i s The applicant modified his original proposal which is contained in the application submittal x 3 - t n dated February 23, 1996. The modified proposal, contained in the letter dated May 7, 1996 o€~ 11-111-111 - W. -W adds the following to Implementation Strategy 3: (added language bold): x z y To enhance the protection of wetlands on multi-family zoned property and h` . j§0 C to ensure the efficient use of multi-family zoned land, the Tigard . J, " Q ; Community Development Code, through the Planned Development process, shall establish a procedure to allow multi-family zoned properties "I X ~iNz ' containing wetlands to develop, with density transfers, to a density equal to the entire parcel's or lot's zoned density." t , x ` r` {t Community Development Code 18.92.020 currently states: r a ~ ~ p - r A. Net Development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the } following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the ` legal description of the property:k 4 2 } i4 t! " 1. All sensitive land areas: i j - xt _ Staff Report CPA96.0003rLOA96.0004 Page 3 I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ -:j f a F' - k s• - t x - a ..rs:r-~°w.-'°" aa-ari --.,1--1-- o.- ~ 'r vssgY t'~ 5 S t F * Z. r ; F F d G r - x i a y t r y k'} - - k_ s 4 'Y r k r --X - - - l , n' 1` I t _ - 3 r f_...t :...r. i... ...a -,_-..,-u _ ._IL. _.yz..7_.._ "q,Q ~ -`Kt?- - ` ,1, z' z g # t rr x kit 3 ku Mr`q`- r, - - -t : 7,3,E '~i.`~'c, 'r" k 7 a - - one,., a..w r.;~as:".' -A ~ v....~.~...__.... w ~.srr au": YT i lsC - ss-`. T ? e'° Thu".'i x arr u a. Land within the 100-year floodplaim, z ,°'k~ U -Kr r ` 1b r b. Land or slopes exceeding 25 percent; <h - 2 i ` 4 fl, ` Y~ and e m - r T' .'z ``s ~s.; Uu s5lk c. Drainageways' h ~ vl_ } r s The proposed amendment adds the following to Tigard Community Development Code - ' " A < 18.92.020 (added language bold, deleted language bracketed): € } a x rs A. Net Development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the ~ - - c h h ' following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the .i - t 1„ O ~3h d legal description of the property: NFL ' ` - a 1. All sensitive land areas: a - , ~ ~ ~ Pt , 1 3' t r a. Land within the 100 year lloodplain; " ~ - . 410 ~ 4 I_ _ . . , b. Land or slopes exceeding 25 percent, x1 , 4 [and] € k ~ ' q _ a Drainageways and " ~ A - 11 d Wetlands;" aY - - ' - d r' -F' f"O~ 4 . . O The Tigard Community Development Code 18.92.030 currently states: r ' r r~ } t A. "Units per acre calculated by subtracting land areas listed in Subsection 4- ~ if - _z~, ' I - f"'~ 'M i 18.92.020(A) (1) from the gross acres may be transferred to the remaining r F 3 r' buildable land areas subject to the following limitations: }9 ~ ;9 p~ 24 r! 4 > t`` A 10 F 4 x L 1.. The number of units which can be transferred is limited to the number of units " which could have been allowed on 25% of the unbuildable area if not for thesew r regulations; 4- ~ 2. The number of units is limited to 25 percent of the total number of units which { . ~ a° r I I. E could have been constructed on the unbuildable area if not for these regulations; t ~x,~e. and ~ ~ z , - V . . - : ~ r 5 3. The total number of units per site does not exceed 125 percent of the t I~i maximum number of units per gross acre permitted for the applicable i ` ` " a! ~a y comprehensive plan designation." b. All density transfer development proposals shall comply with the development x i I standards of the applicable underlying zoning district unless developed under the 3 ` , ~ ` , r , provisions of Chapter 18.80, planned Development. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52" z "1 X 1 ',4], J The proposed amendment adds the following to Tigard Community Development Code Z 3 ,s-" t y - , 18.92.030 (added language bold, deleted language bracketed): § c r r 1 _ ra Y Staff Report CPA96-0003/ZOA96-0004 Page4 Y~,' mk V~ ref' et fkr ~u ¢ asr r . „ « a -„zx*z9N+'z~aa,vx,ca~xzamr..r -"l sn X ~.a 'wm*'°""++wrer ' "4;`"' "G x r - 3~'- - `"~'h. 5h T U 'Yrt - k F 3pti+l^'s j I d C- J'_i~' aytA v- f r,• '.~I r 3+xS`{ Et ~rc d raw i 44 ,1 7I X3' k~ r s n-"' 3 a ~ F 7 M , , " 4'~`_' " ~ i ~ ~ ~ , , ~ , , - - - ~ - nP - - F r s.-rte..- 3 E s t-•.-+... _ _ -mot ~a - -.,w .r: ~~~-o-.. - f^ - .u.. ~....1 .-1_..-, K. K r~~ ~[r a 1. - - .-r...._~.~_ ..ti.._ rte..-.._.1tu_. = - -L ~F - 11 11 I -11, ~ - $ k"- _ - f a- a - I f, - Y - - a i 3- T~"4rw- ~ti ~._~~t'........,....=s,,.,..,r.~...,.~,.>..-_.____.. ...>,.....RZ.. .........-.x,. .x :...,....«..;.....:,...a,.....,:-.:w..,+......s,.ti..~_.._...... -x- },_}t-a . ~ ~,q '-*'~;~X. - . . ~ - 7 z - } 1 A "Units per acre calculated by subtracting land areas listed in Subsection , jr < F 18.92.020(A)(1)(A-C) from the gross acres may be transferred to the remaining _ buildable land areas subject to the following Imitations t c p V G _ t ct h 1~ .c o- - } - - w 0g , 1 , B. Units per acre calculated by subtracting land areas listed in Subsection ' v 18.92.020 (A)(1)(D) from the gross acres may be transferred to the n Kt - r remaining buildable land areas on land zoned R-12, R-25, and R-40 subject . , , , to the following limitations: r - , ! I P r - 1. The number of units which can be transferred is limited to the number of to f r units which could have been allowed on the wetland area if not for these i°`'_", 4 ' regulations• 7 l % -R } 2. The number of units is limited to the total number of units which could . Ste-"' have been allowed on the unbuildable area if not for wetland preservation -t _ &s~ i regulations; and 7M77 -T-77 k r~ P 3. The total number of units per site does not exceed the maximum = 's number of units per gross acre permitted for the applicable m" ~ -2, 4 I 1, s ° comprehensive plan designation" . MIr,~~l-4a [B]C. All dens" itY transfer development proposals shall comply with the * ' ~ {j " ? ~ development standards of the applicable underlying zoning district unless 'v~` , , , W, developed under the provisions of Chapter 18.80, planned Development. (Ord. 3 89-06," Ord. 83-52)" s ~ _ ,1iyy~ - T f SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS ` ~ ` , - -111.1 _ ~4 i ly Y -1 l 6 STATEWIDE GOALS x 1- .i ~ e ~ ' Citizen Involvement: Goal 1 requires a citizen involvement program that ensures the , ~ . ~~z 3k f . fi opportunity for citizens to be involved in the planning process. Tigard Comprehensive ~ ' I Plan Policy 2.1.1 and Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18 provide for citizen , f' , , participation and notice. Notice of the Planning Commission hearing and opportunity for ~t , response was advertised in the local newspaper and request for comments were sent to all y, k aF Jl ' r CITs, DLCD, and Metro. In addition, the proposal was presented to the CITs and their a comments are included with this report. This goal is satisfied. Land Use Planning: Goal 2 requires, in part, that adopted comprehensive plans be f _ revised to take into account changing public policies and circumstances. The 5 ; TM proposal would fine-tune existing adopted and acknowledged comprehensive plan policy .-k related to the transfer of density from physically constrained lands, specifically wetlands. s a- { z This goal is satisfied. x r 'c~,_ , , , ` y .,,w Open Space. Natural and Scenic Resources: Goal 5 requires that, adopted f - C ' comprehensive plans conserve open space and protect natural and scenic t . r resources. This application will not reduce the amount of protection currently afforded r Mr „ wetlands under existing regulation. The proposal would increase the potential density ~ r ; t adjacent to wetland areas. The applicant argues that the proposal would encourage the , ' Staff Report CPA96-000320A96 0004 Page 5 t r 4 f , r-t° ~G., °"'""l. m?k'~%'%F F ~•~,.W3 xi +F- 1 - ..Y 3- ,•J9~z,u.s- e. ,wr..., £ - ,X F r-~ 5- - - - 1 S aS.,.- F d ^LYL - _ - NI ! r - r_ 1 i. r , x _ _ _ _ r+ IF;: x P i% , ~ 61 R t r~X - - r~ } J - .t 4 -11 rw[eJ i l i 5 w .i, , i, r..,>> - L - 1 - rsv.~Y ~n~ tr .p - , . - - _ - : 3 - - - L - i Z -R - ~-HS k - _ I i 3. - - - L } hl > - - f 'Y'`fi` ,1 b - - -S _ 4 - - - _ ) -f i° SZ P ~L+u .„.w.-.v .a..e. ,aL Y _-a a. -.vr. twG S iwas.. h { { 2 - - " * preservation of wetland areas by removing the negative impacts associated with the loss of y ` 11 ' density allocated to the wetland area. Staff recognizes, however, the potential for adverse t+-'$ impacts to wetlands by increasing the density adjacent to these natural features. The extent -i t t to which a 25% or a 100% increase in density will impact wetlands is unknown. Staff, therefore, finds that this policy is satisfied. y ' u k Air. Water and Land Resources Quality: Goal 6 requires that comprehensive plans , } r maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources. The proposal would not have an adverse impact on these resources. This goal is satisfied. Areas Subiect to Natural Disasters and Hazards: Goal 7 requires that comprehensive \ ' . , t P plans protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards. This proposal ' would not modify existing comprehensive plan or land use regulations that control lands _ _ ~x t subject to natural hazards such as floodplain and steep slopes. This goal is satisfied.' w 11 x - u ? ~ : r economic Development: Goal 9 requires that adequate opportunities for economic` development be provided by the community. The amendment could increase , development opportunities on land adjacent to wetlands. This goal is satisfied. fb , ~U ~ ~ z ta, t j t~ F, -v"k Housing: Goal 10 requires that plans shall encourage the availability of adequate ~ ~ ~ L : Y numbers of needed housing units at various price ranges and rent levels and allow for flexibility of housing location, type and density. The amendment would have the ~ F__ ,,B F potential of increasing the number of multi-family units which could be built on sites with g - wetlands. For these reasons, staff finds that this proposal would increase the availability of 14 - -Y' , h €r adequate numbers of needed housing at various prices throughout the city. This goal is ,i x~ ` satisfied. ~ t ~ t I 4r - Public Facilities and Services: Goal 11 requires that development be guided and supported by types and levels of public facilities and services appropriate for the x' i ,t{ ,NN , { z_ ~ 4 needs and requirements of the area to be served. The city has adequate facilities and y- r r~ services available to serve existing Multi-Family land use districts. The city's public facilities plan would accommodate the density proposed by this amendment. It does not effect the `+j + s r - r A criteria that require adequate transportation facilities be available to serve these residential wa land uses. This goal is satisfied- ~ - . , A ,k k Transportation: Goal 12 requires that the city provide and encourage a safe, y ~ r convenient and economic transportation system. The amendment would allow the r r - - transfer of density from sites with wetlands from the wetland portion of the site to the " ` u y - buildable portion of the site. It does not affect the criteria that require adequate f4 transportation facilities be available to serve these residential land uses. The amendment would not cause an unsafe and inconvenient transportation system. This goal is satisfied. M 3 - -y is , COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL OR STATE STATUTES OR GUIDELINES , ' r Oregon Administrative Rule: Section 660-12-060 states that plan amendments which significantly affect a transportation facility shall assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity and level of service of . i 5 the facility. The proposed amendment would not result in generating any additional k y traffic. It would not change or increase the density above that which was planned. All ' z` requests for quasi-judicial Comprehensive Plan map and zone changes for specific , p c Staff Report CPA96 000320A96-0004 Page 6 ~ r"~; .mss - ks F I - r 1 -x- I 15; _ - - - G :r r _ f-' . -•4 - t Yk ,y _ 'r - k i r eee...' ~ r - r r ~ - 1~ o~_, " .1 - M, rI - _ I ~ ; r ' ~ ~ 2': ~ , - J , _ - " , " . I- T^ z•--^^t---.-^ _r~'~~T"-,~f'1a.eti"R ^^T-~.•..'."_T'~.~'^-.y~,.er rT"".-'T-;,'__^ _ ._-r^C~.'! - { - _l~- v. ..c ,_-l - - _ -.1 L'u 2 _i. _ mac.- _~,ri _ a - - L_ .Y - r -L1-, - - r.,, f - t _ s , ® - .~3-{F z r+ z 4 _ _ _ _ - e. ,J*--.f 7 Z.~~ ~4 3 _ - - F } L i - - - - -tAi C 1 t _ _ _ _ - c *e M ly 'X F..,..___....-..._....nn+.«t"..m_awe......ra.....u»...-........ 6 r"4 `iw' 5 I > K~- ryast0y ~+'_>t_,..e'~ 'v'_ -.t`'r Y - property are analyzed and evaluated for compliance to transportation policies and € y - ' rules, including this state rule. The city reviews all requested quasi-judicial changes for , 4F compliance to this rule and makes a determination based upon that review. Findings of R s 1 ~4 comptiance or noncompliance to this rule would be made following a traffic analysis of g r , 1, he specific proposal. This policy is satisfied. r - COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES ` '`k b k " Y General Policies: Policy 1.1.1 (a) requires that legislative changes be consistent with statewide planning goals and the regional development plan. The findings } , . " T above address statewide goals. There is no applicable adopted regional plan. Metro was _ ent a request for comments, and none were received. This policy is satisfied ~ ~ V n . General Policies: Policy 1.1.1(c) requires that the Comprehensive Plan and the ~ f Community Development Code be kept current with the needs of the community. The ` < " } applicant states that there is a current need to increase residential densities within the t" , ~ # ~ m A region, and Tigard to accommodate growth. Staff agrees that this amendment would f - , 3 promote a more efficient urban form and accommodate additional housing units. The - applicant, however, has not submitted compelling evidence that policy should be amended , . - to afford wetlands a higher density transfer standard than other physically constrained ; ' 2'` I " lands. Staff does agree that wetlands should be afforded the same density transfer ~1 standard as other physically constrained lands(e.g. floodplains, slopes > 25% and [ - - j' 4" - drainageways). Staff cannot, therefore, make a finding that this policy is satisfied. E r s) r" ) Citizen Involvement: Policy 2.1.1 states that the City shall maintain an on oin g X g . citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an , ,,'r 'J ~ ~ 1 x opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. A request for m ~„fa t comments was sent to all City CIT individuals and the Planning Commission hearing was . ~ legally advertised. In addition, the proposal was presented at all CIT meetings during May - ~ of 1996, and comments are included in Section VI of this report. This policy is satisfied. 7 ` Natural Features and Open Snace Policy 3.4.1(c)states that the city shall designate, "i g~ ~ f" , , in accordance with goal 5, the following as areas of significant environmental "`#r" -11 . 1~ concern. (a.) significant wetlands and (b.) areas valued for their fragile character as z 111114Z., _1 habitats for plants, animal or aquatic life, or having endangered plant or animal ti species, or specific natural features, valued for the need to protect natural areas. $ -'a F Policy 3.4.2(a)states the city shat) protect fish and wildlife habitat along stream ? f corridors by managing the riparian habitat and controlling erosion, and by requiring ' that areas of standing trees and natural vegetation along natural drainage course F? and waterways be maintained to the maximum extent possible; , This application will not reduce the amount of protection currently afforded wetlands under y C , existing regulation. The proposal would increase the potential density adjacent to wetland ! areas. The applicant argues that the proposal would encourage the preservation of wetland ' 4 areas by removing the negative impacts associated with the loss of density allocated to the s F wetland area. Staff recognizes ,however, the potential for adverse impacts to wetlands by 5 increasing the density adjacent to these natural features. The extent to which a 25% or a ' 3' 100% increase in density will impact wetlands is unknown. Staff, therefore, finds that this F' - c t policy is satisfied. " , ~ t r. ; F E - F€ r Stall Report CPA96-000JZOA96-0004 Page ? `r ~•t, E , ~ _r' ~ z~~ ' - ~ [ , " t~"'~-'- "'IJ ~~7 - A ; , G f` r, - - Llr: 1r _ 4F7 tom...¥r2 _.i E 1 ry £ t 1 _ Y -7 _ 7 4.. 1t - Y ( t 5 F ~ 4 1 1+.".` _ l.^^^Tr^^~-.+I~a'r~!'"_-_.r" ----Fr_-..-~m~F~-T_-- `V i • 1. . rt.L-.D,S•, _ ~_f.e_ . _K..~._ 1. ~..1 i L .-tea - .ter -..._.:r{i. t. __.5. _.1 _ _-SJ,_- ~.v... a... _~i ._,~~~~1`~eYi..+=...-'. jp: - ~ F p~"7- i - - - ~SSr k C - 2 y, F ..4 - - fY 4- p s x'. y r _ - - - _ - _ w 3x,- ,G Y, r u_,&;. aa.,.a,,..:x...:.- -~?.,z.&,.ac.: - - i t wki- U3x x r z j , fr > r' Y3 Housina: Policy 6.1.1 requires that the ci E ' j n ' w ty provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various prices and rent levels. This policy is r `'n ,h primarily implemented through OAR 660-07, the Metropolitan Housing Rule. The rule s. - requires the city maintain sufficient residential buildable land to provide the opportunity for ' _ ~ j-' at least 50% of new units to be attached single family or multi-family housing and to provide s 3``?I-, - - -51E for an overall density of ten units per acre. r ` The amendment would increase the number of multi-family units that could be built. The i { applicant argues that without this change Tigard would be below the overall goal of ten - units per net acre. The reason for this, according to the applicant, is that wetlands were not z netted out of the initial buildable land inventory and the density calculation is incorrect. The r - -al - - argument is that units are being allocated to areas on which units can not be built or r. r ~ q_. ,m, transferred. K' It is also true that floodplains were netted out of the buildable land inventory and that 70% i ` of inventoried wetlands within residential areas are contained within this floodplain ( xv { , r boundary- This leaves an estimated 30% of the inventoried wetlands that were not netted ° ~ ' . I out in the initial buildable lands inventory. y `P -4-;~," ' : --i Netting out wetlands is not critical to the density calculation. Rather the density calculation ~ U~, - s would only be affected if the area occupied by wetlands had a higher proportion of land Y' "t _ r zoned multi-family (this would lower the overall density and percentage of multifamily) or if = '~13 a higher proportion of the land was zoned single family(this would raise the overall density ~ ~ ~$x and percentage of single family).The effect of not netting out wetlands can not be ~~i - -1 r t determined with absolute accuracy since the buildable land inventory used for the density ` ' , ' calculation is not readily available. An estimate of this impact can be made by evaluating ~1 ~ 3u, - s the 30% of inventoried wetlands which are outside the 100 year floodplain. According to nx,"W , a existing zoning these lands would net 396 gross units with 47% single family and 52% , I I -1 multi family. This policy is satisfied. 3 3 41. Transoortation Policy 8.1.1 states that the City shall plan for a safe and efficient ~ r - tW r - street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future ~ 3E 3 growth and development. The amendment would allow the transfer of density from sites t ~r q x with wetlands from the wetland portion of the site to the buildable portion of the site. It does 'Z, ~ not affect the criteria that require adequate transportation facilities be available to serve .1 these residential land uses. The amendment would not cause an unsafe and inconvenient ~ transportation system. This goal is satisfied. mfr~_ ~ ~ ~ COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: 9.1~, v i Procedures for Decision Makin Le islative: Chapter 18.30 establishes ~ ? procedures for consideration of legislative changes to the provisions of the F Ksx J _ Comprehensive Plan, implementing ordinances and maps. Section 18.30.120 1, I F lists the standards for the decision of a legislative change. The standards and ` h t R responses to these criteria are as follows: x { r , t r x, d - 4q v C ,~,s,.'~s j 1. The statewide planning goals and guidelines adopted under Oregon , t , Revised Statutes Chapter 197. These standards are addressed in Section IV * ~ under 'Statewide Goals' in this staff report- as r , r4, 3'{ T 2. Any federal or state statutes or guidelines found applicable. The state's " G Transportation Planning Rule is addressed below under "Oregon Administrative ~a x i f 7 j y K}}° $ i t r Staff Report Rule" 1r-.~ F iw fr r CPA96-000?~OA.96.0004 8 - r - gyp{ Page j ~5 f l Y r`F kt' 1 1, YZ { f - 4 i. 1 I -1 1 ,~i~~~~,~~',,4~"~,~-~~~~,~_,~i.,:",~ L _ I " , ~ - ~ . , r . ~ . ~ I I I 1 ~ , i ~j .-I- V, r - ,hv, _ r 1, I p' i y u Z6 x* F° r r "F- 7 , , - - 4'' ~g r" , - I ; ' - , - : . - , , , : T-, " ~ ~ t[-- - _ J . . . tu- ,'6ta t. - , . _ - - - , - - ,wig - -_,~Lg - d a _ _ f ~-*~-s - a Ili 4 r i ,a 1 tr. r fY' yY tY q - x ~1 Y d € t - - - - y,'i S l + IN, e_1 ss~ m u. yew z. =v u a k} t F Yt_ "'r jai - q 6~- ~ 3. Applicable plans and guidelines adopted by the Metropolitan Service J`F ( z I~ F { ~ District. There are no applicable plans or guidelines adopted by Metro. ~5 ~,%hs 4. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and map. These standards are Mi- - , ' 4 'a k addressed in Section IV under 'Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Policies' t, ,t 3a in this staff report. - 4 G. The applicabie provisions of the implementing ordinances. The e , * F , implementing ordinances are contained in the Tigard Community Development V-,- a t Code, which are addressed in this section of the staff report.' M z s ~ 3 3 f 6. Consideration may also be given to proof of a change in the neighborhood ~ , _ T'g° i , F , or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or ,I - ~ - implementing ordinance which is the subject of the application. gp, The applicant has satisfied this code section. It is satisfied because the first five f• standards have been adequately addressed in this staff report and the sixth x~ r x standard is optional only. I' 'tWM fi - r ' . , SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS 4r t x ~x s ' ti No Comments : r - - 'Y _ C y - - , -M '11111~ ` SECTION VI: OTHER COMMENTS ifsr The Engineering Department reviewed this proposal and suggested that transfer of t _ g - ` ~ ' r density also be allowed from the 25 foot buffer required for wetlands. The Building P-4 , L t a ~f j { A Department reviewed this proposal and had no comment. '-~st tf „ ~ - The CITs have reviewed this proposal and offer the following comments: No written f comments have been received to date. The South CIT heard the proposal at the,~ - , _ meeting of May 1, 1996. The members expressed concern that this proposal would ~ " - r y 11 I have an impact on existing neighborhoods. (Note: the applicant revised his application # ,I- I r 4 to only include land zoned multi-family after this meeting). The Central and West CITs _ir v fr - ` ~Z~." x c heard the proposal on May 7, 1996. The members questioned revisions which would a allow more density transfer from wetlands than other physically constrained lands. The ~ g ` East CIT heard the proposal on May 8, 1996. The members supported the concept but ~ F N 4 E r F Y felt that applications should be reviewed on a case by case basis, and that there should ~ , f fip be no guarantee of 100% transfer., $ Kl~ y r'` _ FF r `w3 s June 5 1996 t y 1 4 - £ -i F PREPARED BY: Nels Mickaelson DATE r ;r 'f t { , -p Associate Planner ~r a - " - ~ ti'- _ - s - s x June 5. 1996{R ! X i f APPROVED BY: Nadine Smith DATE t ~ x J t t r- , Planning Manager 3 ` , r Ea a 7 ; ~ I , 1 4 - 1llryimnebtCPA9&03.ce r"f y7 } " 'x-Ix t y~r ` t*, } Staff Report CPA96.000320A96-0004 Page 9 s < s - r S3sj d a j i- A ~ r ,s{ t F A {t = ..+.i°;1 ar 4 `fir _ - _r,'z^` [ Y % _ SP - t _ ~a3a y v yu' 3 } far 's' is " L s~'' G 5 9'`',r.- r r s is - i t - f f t." _ r m r _rr 77 -y S t a n y d r .rya t -i La 4 All x.~' k, j X Y -'c a` t'~t, +s kFp i 7 _ u.s- X1111 l L... M" b Tti +T•~n F`~~_ _ ~T^Z~~r.-. 'a~T4'•~.~~.r .f' T ^_e°4 v i a .M:', 1 ~ xt + ,~'Cl ~'~`#1"{Fy1{.i: rf7 15 ~ 11 ,LY x ~ r A.: `•h' i ~ I SAN- "IV S:GJ,r 1 [ 1a„'3~~v g' y{ 1:,a ~u i y,'f i t r ri~( t y'.. Ir f r 477. r 1 e ' " m yd ~ -r ~ N ~ , F ,G A} I I I 2 % ~ 'si { 51 I Ef' '3 I - - LL _ k~'~=~. d r f I5 , ' 1 i ~ I thy le.~ S . F,I, 1 S i 1 4 h t: {j III lip! .Y:.Fw{ :4 ✓ h. tl `£n;.:t, „yy 'WS.'~.# ,t ,r tl Z kt^a.- zh" ~r' s,x 4 ~C"t•: ear. ka a~~''sv*aT~•..,,:.~, -,'r.-E `ss' .2 ~ 6~; E.u •~yy, ~ ~a ^vr k ~ ~ 5':~ + < ' ~.^.>7 3`~saii7. ~NStw,d;«g, t; 1 ?l I- fi ~ .ix ~'-.'~aFtR1: ACA' sk~~J't,C,p q ti t ~ s'a.. p~.~:'-1"... h' ~v a "v. dZr., y~3 r4it, ~ ~ d"'s h; ~r „Fi= r. : ~ r`' ~^r` . r.. [ wia 5 o' °3 3 . ~M:i S'~'' a¢~:' s~~~•°u$'".'~~',~:>;.~ s ~c 's. ~ ~ `a ~ P-~ n¢- v"'tWf~~iLL~'E S+Y,~.°{ ',sr •.y~a~tR.+~. kAr,',',~ "~3'°,. ii" :o`~~ .N YB,r• r'a "a'„iq ,d:S',''«l''a +~tf+;.~ F'~, " '~,»E` ^''t"~' ~ y ry. e3i, ° '°fs~ s , .e+ , '',SPY ir'S~" a3;. ',r:~'*Fc.~ ;~~g'"~..,'F~' ~.'x`"' -^.:.ta-~..~," -'a, ~^?g'v`~, :k~.•,.t, :r '+;y~, g ,Y•, ^~R`+:"r4;,.''~r r,-- ,s ~ ;a~fu:,.+i .w, ~ E ,+~~~:f'"'.i3,~,°,~ _ ~ - m"~.-,-. °,+fk,~' cFrd#„,.iu ~ ''t. ,v~?gr}. '['r.v..r ,_.t„ ,M, a i ,'«G4i..' w-r, l . . a~ r . ~ ~s* ~9,,r n~ A}~ =sax, '.Y i~'+~ : ~4t ~i> v q r~t,_ . rr'3'•z. ~E~`',Sfi t1, = t ~-~si~, . ~ r~s §,r, ,zr.> r -~r . ~r M .J ;°',tt.. M',~.~~.~' ~~r '~:.~V ~'t~$:~zers. +.1 ,-rz, i, " s ~P, ~n, ,i~ rr-s.^,``'~„'r'^ ,g'~hix..? ~d ~'„or. Y''` ~:s.,s -f ±o- . '4"~.'^"'~ . -a§r'•..°~'. fi„ F v.",~. t,«- u..~~f,Ga , . € ,ikrk • , . . 'L~ ,r.," nf`" a^ r.: F ra, ; r; rz . -.a ^r "c§~~.~'~` "'?~~'2da'k k~. >nn"a,,, _ K. fit, r oa •tA. I~,;, . t ~;s, ~,.ra r~n .,off, P ~ ~ '<s:. ,.,x , , r=;,n ,.x ' a. "s. =rw,..s; :«yd, ',rl ,,1 r ~ ti.,, Y ,i ° _ w'! ' ~ a^ ~ ,h~, _ ;.f?' ~r'a~rM,'~~-~'.yr .a ~ r srcv„+fi„r~R>xAi.: ~*~S, •"~„':.:,r,'~. ,.1~, . ~r •az3a'~ e;~.._, .a r " v9ar"z '.~'4`~, "'w~,`~"'.. - '4. ~ . t ~ '~`•at a, ? ~ ,r.d. e. .r. f~'~i^-- ~S:.SP. ~ ~ "`:.r{+ '•.ts`" p t" . 3t': x v f~ 't§~r b 1 ; ,r~.~.- . ~f~r x a k ;r ,r ,;a: d „ s'. - ~.~r , a, ~ G~rF::'a• t i .a.~ a'~? , ,.,w,..~~' > . L , PS-.>a'' .t,r,}~ .x,r • ~ W i ar. ~ t§.. ~ r'L~ r€; r,+w,, rY' 'E'„a r ' ,9 nr,~ ..'}H . 5 - la4,dMk, A +}.L r . d ~ i "1' ++v""~'~"'-'+, w, r•;f f' " rf".. .t; * „:i'~[ ~ i, t Ys `"t 3 > s^, p.$ ~,3, , .Ai. ~ ~ 1 u',Z+: s s ^ ':ic "r'+~ " :'r ' w ra. , ^v;3Y•'°t'A , zP . n.,, ear` d. + 4 '-Y~o-~~ r' , 'x F ~~,3 "i P,ua: vaiv ^ ~.x ~'r .A~, • ,•cM, • k, pc, .«;r~;t..3F,, , x .'+ig' c , P :'4i r ~a" w§ ~ a ~7rz^ ~L. eydm .,>r~i~ a 1,:..°~''•.., 'k'~e • qi' ..;1 tte~a Y , F ~ . t,. ?q„ s+,. "~i` .C•' ~ . aY`:w.:,a: r.-^ s ':•rTM A r~, f. 'r"r .r:' c reT-,..m r . , f~ 3 :+S"•.s °''wa +a~ itd', {,uk ^.t. ":~`a~>. 3#r> 4f" _ ~-rT~r"'~,~ c:Y" a, ,.r; ~r'~~+ rid e ;'-2 s,,. ti'-:,..a., c„ 1:'''. w, t' °#~.rt '.,,yr' ~ ~ .'dk.+>`, . , ^S^ n .4."r.' a x ° , tt, i . a'.t , ,.x+" "t. '~*iad- r, tir x~'^ •.'~-"x : "~R .,t „h ° ~:Lx' ,as.' r' t x~ a ~G,` t `i::. 3' -~'r, x: V~? ^f'+ ^ ~,r'~ < -tee' rrw' ,s., i y,~~ .w' • .sar` x -.r . a x, ,a r 'vh,..r ua <P"7'ar,, ; r;yx , ^,F>w h ~ .3g w '°•^y~'t, . r ' ~ ."3'r a.":. t':as^ IY •"ti: f 4r y ~rn#':. .,t":tu',' X,. ,,.~"7µ ~ rA°` !,r4!,.. i'wfv, r^'F w 4, ri++ ."•".^fv' L'1, .,d' rt' . .u$, „g ~Y A. 5~~x•r, k,• i.l .4.4::4. ~"",1 x:4r'1 `i. r~9;- ,.,+~'o ,arx. Y• f W nd'` ,~s 't. .r+7nnr - - r .a'Mi•• „ n!. ,n u' d a„4 ..s' .'PS 7. }q;>. ,ka P..", •;X'.`^:P. 11 d. r:,}r~x^'_, - ,P. s.xf,°'`._ 'r .{x,+ , : :~.aw.rr'4'y, 7' - - 1 ..;i,, ~ 'Xs.s":~,,. =<r"~ AF~ ,<r'+ .~,a~, '~.E"~' ,,Y n':+r,.< .r~'YN°•,is ^s '-,a~ .'S'~~"', ':,~tY,-':•'".r' y,:,:'.+,: '1SZ-.~S .t~: ,a•mr .,ynki"A" P;, „'ny., j"k,f. ,d; ,~~1h,r ! n':a'?`!;" •.at,xu 5., .'~"a~+~.,., .•..a+u.o-:`,~'lyi,M,e.x~,a+... t ,,,t "Ya;;`..'m,-~: J.~ ,t Y:.'a~:r..''~'~",ad" a ~.ewfi;,z'~47~,1;:s uatiekww .,ay..M"„&~kas9Li• 1 (t~ > 116-2W k 'r7a tit, ; '~Y't a^t"fyltL - ~a a r nn n~'+tkr,5 },t 3siri 1 1 ~£y ~1r'~t s^~ t~ S~•a~~~,-: a -y'~s zfS 'r ~ ~x s~1x '-i i 7[➢ rYi +.t ,rxe9 s M, riy ark "fix 1 Iw a i r Mt Kta%sa;tr r o€ m ar t + ~ 1, a , y a r„ f 4 y, ? -I Y 3 a l .{S A! in aim 1 P T' S j~ [ y 1 slow a- 1 1 t, I _ yi FI 3 i s r' - 4 - III f: 7r J s s{ ~lt,} A I t a FF 11 a All AM OWES? A R `1 X /1 tp J_i Q A r ,Rf _ ~i ~i d r r ,,,E t t t« g f } ~ ~I 15 OR folio U _ a ~'x + j.: 4 t r r i AGA It as Y r r r - s S MOON gK, w' - y a 1 r ~ I r } s y { ~ nary f. NOW 1 5 - a. h.va,e'r 'u 1 d dRi i h^ i - { -_j + a, €~I 'cap ihrA p,a 34~,a, {y,(5r- p ks rti m Yq tt`~NP t eG g~~, x~~'f'~ r~~',~~`f~E+~s ~•rY$f -r ^s.F' Gi & y~ v L 4 t ~ ~ ~ y n4 ~3 , ~r 1 WWI ~Y, 'Z,a F k G~ ,1:;' s € a ' Y i c , ka- , •~h } - I -4 f t >Y : k.. f t "S~ +f. }5~ a„4 4y t Y s - ~i.a ' d't [h.~i, =t~,- h N _ _ ^Sg.t 'Vtrtl q '1'r' r C a M':•.4'» e".,'z-",.. s'>a A _ .i' .a , •e . Yx F- 2, = k,'. a z ~."t,'r 1 ~Vl"a<Ytr ~:4 do 1~~:e - (s .r]' ~?~5 tw: x Sak s d.. y mug h S~F ' U r y q,, 4't ~3~ .9 ar 2.•- - Sr .^3 s fi" ! '~^=:-5r { A-5,1n, s =0. au°' ,d "t`" 'srr*.r y~~ tA• .u'~+?? ..n;rK `$s~, rpr:. .'l ."t',~S.. 0 of ° s~TF s r{+r *fYc4°{f,.nTy i-^ .•S'}' n , t•*.> .z,' ~;t;~ ,,:;rte ' v, s Gam: -:mot:>,~ , ~'"1 ~R ,Fr w ,u6 d' f 4.." `liia ::1fs.:,e✓'.l-`: .u•4.,, ;t3m, a ,.,r., s, 't-'^. .d6, ,di. ,at. axr. .F~ -„,~.,.>p. - a: rv,rS •'•'Fb`rXr R4 ..kt'=» •r.i. , d g.. .}r"'R• Yi^: „ A ^ "•.,,f',? r..>w„ tir i`{•D d a , e.,^ IN at,•: , ~ a,:..'ca': ,.r",,Y a:~r` ~`+$o~•, Ah:'~.;':". . .i`'': w ,F.,f:,ss•-::; L Lsw, ..J; • r... •4 '~^'c t: TF' k Pal . aF$ ~r 4, -'.40 ..l Lh ,1^... , 3 ; !r"e ..c' t•';,tn e.',`x +a":!' '~`'r,L" a 5: .4`S rt^d;,^ 1' . •UN- S'"r y „ .•:YA',.E1 E - ;:A `I ^v,, rSY' ,dt« N IN ti i; . '2°'. a•.q„ t''"' wT"' 'Y",v 'ik:, . w" <:i=- .~'.i.n"' rg "s'' c .w., r~'r .,,h, +Nk ,'s''' `'Se„ :.t 5t,+. sY .,a}rs, ,f' .t'.'i~~: •,fi~vo- '"S5 ,.:t T,; at, r~ ~r':,• ~ ,1F; t4x.., i_~,., :s r:i ..5.,. , s Mr ''wr>. '~.3e.C*,- s+ rtx ..:r 'i,.'.. 1 au .l- ~ ..?t ,','s'em„+; '7Y~'.. „a x` ,'.des, +aa V,vaa3:, .'>5'- 's`.. .'~z ri ~ it {'w,^~'` ri. 'Nn, r., r:y,-.. , ,q. ? F ,.^fi+ u 9,• z iy°' ~ i . '7xr: .u$. .;f"Nr+e" w ar ;r;r+. •wJ. 'y,J'-yp' , t n c , ' ✓ + ar,,,, gy w n x „s s Ark t] { "emu b ~ ':rte .,y- h , ;'Ya~ra'F• .~`:u '»S, ` ~'A" :d' . ~t , ~ r .i $~.'."u•. y.. v."3t-, rr•A'+'r.Pdh'°"F'.!++Y ✓.,r~,F:, ~-r .,„aw,` 3r > 4. rR ~ a, i -'k:,tr. .~~e "r •.,r,. . t c„a ii:A .9'~.. e?^". "t`x€'"~%i"^ «:€£'x ^ , ~ i. `1~.ki*y, ,7•' , s _,araar si~i;.yr,. ,;,.~,z. r fv ~ w. h., + r t . 4`+ + zr's;~'>~.s.-ter. a .,a ! a ~aM{„y~ . ..rsv x~: 'rw+*~,, . fi m J't`Pi'7Y'eyy L•:, :A`,' l '"C.! .R.i'n b. .;,{.p }L'4n--'+ xsert„ err, .,a^a t = r.'H 6". ~.,,w-, r. '~'r-,,.,, N~„- „a,,,,.,.-".,:, d, ;a ,:t, 'fir .t h', ~~;v"~~'u` :w°„-a.. ~s'+ " ~ .~P, ..fii3.r:rt~ t'(:~ ,`fb'• a •`t',v Fi n~ x, .t ?N ,t~.u.. d .as„ ,,,,h; .,r,`~., : s^a a..^ : ir,^,. ."fir' ^ ii^''~.,., ;-A 4~u.. 'Y= . ~~z,• ?r r,l C 2 c~'f'W'^^ S` c. '"+4,. 3. ; ,rG-Y., r'S.:. -;?r.e„ G!~y, y »t•a: t. `W V,: ' •`M` G. .S', `.`1`v. d v.-F', k' 2. S,%.. i'k,a A.. a+.,'e. a5 n -'k'~*,~..i `a" n ~ ~ v,~l "'tiu N. x~ rtd'"~~.... , 4. ; a''"<' ~F ,•~,t. ^ `7 r : r"<` . fit. e, x: ~ r+.: , <x ~fi, ~.T 5,, 4r . ~',a ,",f. . .a,M1 d .,s^ ~ E pan e 5 a J - K zg4a # j._!~'~ ??-,;.s w ~+~z. szsxf >a t~~ ) lea r V-~ LL , mss. ~ s.~. ~ 4ayy✓ ~ ~ _ _ -I. 1 . -4.~~,-_ \Wf /1 K' a ax '$x --ce - „s.! a eta r ~Al r r- I ~ y y~ s b i_1 i.,It ~-I ' f)N(nTA r - ~s N ~s~- 4%fir . - a _LJ Il (lJ - 3 TI-I a s , -Ml 1 t 9'r w ? (3A bE _ -I. Sf q I i sue,-Y',', S . _ l-_ -75 t L* --DR LLT W" R TS, '01 - t'5BEEF M. ggl ns•'i r _ c st 16W ES, x rz` r s tttPPP 7" F, r}•°"r rr y z~..... y, ,..ter - r" - - 2~ 2.{ rtt~'. 77 77777. z fr -ez it r - - - - 3 b y jlk t t r t -f5~ d l,~h~ ~ - z d r t~°' - ~ e~{l -'xll I 4r ~i 12 n- J 1911 ~ •i + 1 - i - si'- e t { t. 1 r ~ Ji'' 1 t 1`• G,:;: ,y{' ks I I° 6.1 f u, ✓ i d u~ „7 Y J I 'i _ ~_r` , ° `I'. tll r 3'r a 1 ,~,_,^,1 1 :7 ~'ik:`, is ~ rh I `f ai , Ft.< 1 *,f + i I r.- 1 trs.:' 4 FI ,;1 { 't ,:i, / k" ~ ~ € ''c' a I I t r~ ro 6 s I r r ! S~ i c F F«"y'1'f '.a7 I} 1 LAW." iL it,:i y,.t t r•,1• W ~.t ~t.,,~f' ' '.c" .+.n :n ; ? ' ; '.,,fir :n., ,4 'a >r' E ,!'s.-:,. .f,- ar,t --.,.."Ru:t t*d<h. ,5 'v `M1,w• ' 1f. r w,,,~, m, x FY„ •ft"z'.*"`sY.t. ':'fir it r/'''+'.~w'"~g` .r, w:~♦ .t-, i]'~ „t- ,•a, i:.t' a.. .,~„'~wu` tss- x ,r *.1 r+~s4'~~ ~ . : r k ~ m J, . d~4 _ ~•n w`~' ~ ,,y r ...p ~•;ia zk r`9' ° . ;t '~i, s g,7 °s"• ..,i.; 3r^,,Y.. 2J, a'E.iw, ;ty4' '3 vk 9 ''u' n•,"'?19. """";~.z°°,+,.. ,n•Y. :~.ra ,.v,+s r.:,z., r, ~ d" •~f, >:.''a;"" ~ wu ~r - ~~ER `>s:.. ~ § n ~t„f'1.2hPo; ~ xr".:: ~ C SreR••5~"'" "}~'„'a~'a .~MS'£:. 4?- n . aS: a ,`~a, rvr+°,~7, ~rms~l".a,S.r 11510 '°Fg.. ♦i:~tw.' 1. ai z~ Lr ~-6: ,-,Y' 3.-..~s.. `~£i'~.'. ':*r't ..sr....''~'.,~~~, kr.^;"h: S'~'Y!3:"u„• a_a~ _ .r-^''~. A`~"":~~','~~~~" ~'~~`+'"ot..e'xv A+<r x-h ~„>_a "n"~Tt~f. .rs~'~'n, .+~4~'^r' :.,~,p' 'z+.. ,t^,.-. . N.:t".•° _ . °r+~7, a „v°~'•' m r->rra. r2~, 1~',r".' a-,r i4+., ter. s . w a . ~'e}'r' i`r~ ;'t',M.,rT' :~ra ~,r,. r',z- ^'?;C'rv s~t t .i< < .s»,,., .ca., r. r"r= . t a ~ ~ a~rh„' . r ~ ~n ~ ~a., v ro . v~~a>..,~ Fs,~,.~~,. t ' <!Mr°.~:, . .fir a .a;• s'i-#c.. ` a• .-•<`Fx, ..,i .r, ~a., ^'°s'": '>:Pa. ',''9`", '~'°_s:'4,. , .rc'h r~", ~ • ,a- ,s. r .zy' ..~d''2. e a, .'v'K ®R „t<~». `z:~,. ,N.,a,x.''`" ;~Y`ki' .tx f _ 4' ~n •4 t.>< .3i~^fr' tr='~r1.,rt.v, : •,:fw.. YF.., '.i *•t, ,.~-,z'.w,: .fir. M,.r", ,r •':'r. E ,..•(•;<,.,w w, t~ r u xr..wd nr ,Tnx d ,ur°*u, r•,•,+y .^~P'ta L •.r.4. '2` t~: :.;i~ sF „>.r. .?^r. r.~ '.2 'd y' ,f.", J r~ F"':~, w `'•a~S• at. «^t ar ~x'" U~. rh„ tars,' ~ ° '•r - ,e a .r~?'% rr r,,n4 ' ,.Fa+~N, x'~rc~'' a:,Yi'~ t'~'~v,e r""'a<,.F a . -~`h,. 'r . r'~~' v?;x>.. rt`'' ff u, , d. ~t ENV, +x:r ,"tar? d'"~ w,a. nr ..,F.; ^ t sa<. .=r4 `.,a;•,.. ; =r ;,d. , r > -,y,,.>~ . ~ t• '`sue - Y~-,,, ..r z - e;,• . M Y. f' !k"2 ' 9 { . .a4 ~5 1-51s =V 3 , 9. A c f v 4 .s..s .'4 v: ` r?,'k' a rv - w'r,- " rn.:~ ~•P . ~ G r, ; ,y,„ . 6 . . . . ~ , s r. w r a . , . $L~`d" u.. h m a .rP.•s'.,~ .L ; ; r::wT.-t=c Yc.~ -d,. a .x., _ , - ..1 .,,A'.F ,r^, . X x . c}F, 8 - a, - nr' ? •7t „aYa.- - a•K, , `v , h.:: .••"d.'- ,;fat: 'y - ' 6 w~%3%.~" •uM ~vbti ~ •Ik r~i,. , . te" ,4, W 5:.. f > W r ~i s"„ y .^'a' . ^F bay ,,,.~n• .',,p, '=a;^.> :;:ya^ , P . F t. a x f n.Y .y~,-.. .,..4"` '•.-...<,.'t-wiz &f. „ 'a .°F`c. , s : ~ a, r,. h -x "st a>.t ,,r . `'h c m ",.k ........,:.,.cwt, `.~4 " ;''e. a, :.,p". , , r r. ,v: , 5. r ,u w s i. if :'rr, Y X ? •-0,3 „w .T _ '2a 4e 58":»Y ; ^ Kay",^t'-s^e`-s. .aar7. •Fr ,a:~ a , ~ ' *1.« ~'r:'vi='"x.;`;s~ai,l~'_>.::_.r~.u,,,:,aw: ~c:9,,...,n»5.tra y -spa fi' ar f*~~;a`,„,~,^-ars ':"S',^'i>."v ,.,,;zo-w-..~'.a~:,,zsr,»;,.,~,.x~x,ta~`>~;'cwM:x3.,~at',va3~„_a.t ♦,.J n,.. .:~,~~}vK~.w•.x..+e'rt'dr`lk'~k"u~su;""~a'"~r~.a,caaud'~.}z.d,wira,w,~'tw.^`k`a;:,:i.,w.u~a*esutu"~•k;~M,rF u. t- , ~ K ~ ~ Et-'-f z t-1 >'C r~-CY,J,^~ I+t1 r,ry, f;'4 ikxr-S-1 C^'' 1 ~r tt V-S iP xis a4 vy.OWS I' 4 u k ivy ;k,qc t~, _ r 1r* I G t 11t+tr CAj 1 r}'/- - ~i j~ -'t t s - SIP sup" r1 tt mss, (({5'T Q._.~ } r ¢ TM WE wAs _ a~j ~ y}{ M1 ~j _ Z` E 'sk", ~ ti 1 _ - MAE y` r' 3 7S i ° ~ x+ ..f u 1 t aE I t ! F F°~ ' P I Tog US 3450 QQ F ~r. Il A ~yi I KI ~ _ I 1 ' I Y C k t( 1J 1 r I I I F~ j& j fed h 1 S h ry1 I~~~ III Ii( ~ ~ ago .S -A, toots tl- c.7r + is Fr -Cf r- r 1 1 2 x 4 'i+T 1~ ';4rt1}Y>, 41 ~ r 1 ~ d f ~ ~ i , I u 5- f r zit.x u i { t 4t"t,r.M xr {'i x,+»al >vra + i t I 3 I 1 - .r ,rah kF' V N P `x•'ka4J1`i(r '#9"'F'mis 7 5f ''t r ~r-- a-- r fi p s k - rut {F '4a', "'3t~,'=r k s s ° ' =;h 3fl Y # - r'r 'E"'-'4~T. •i~ I ( ( 1 I 1 I / " h' I`~' -33r~x4 x.' t X37 ~ I /v / _ 1 I i ~ I ~ r---- $ ~s,n J '~CdCC r,.~ 1 1 e "r'',;~7'.;~' r"t" Y ~ ~ ~ _ ~ t P c ~ Y 7"'' a a t, > 'ji `t~~~,r~#~~a2 ,d~ c~' ~d L~~ I ( .I ~ / 1 / y ~C x ~I I ~'TI~ I I ! J ;,v r 14o- t ~ t ~ y ~ i 7 fi,T" t? r1-? .o 7h 1E.s ,4' e^eyu „e, ^"'Z'^n.^^,,,,, .«+^i^'^^, m,x'x•n,-}.n .,.,,•p;~;*+r... .•-,....,..,,.,I,n~,lsr ,.„-a'•~.ay°,..».n,,.., „`r..5.,,•p-•...a...p,pP,.,t,r.?aNnet..•,d,';a, .x:= .'F,~ f a-y A«~ J.l.. S C" 2"1 lot C T & Lr,., r A' f YtF • n Vv t' .Y. '.~{~:ix .u1- ' _ C n4 . Y:i _-~!>a r; ',4p, - amt«Ffe4-. ~!t. V. - a w,t y" .ir.r k, 5 1r!Sp. ,.rfs"•'k - t -='1,:i s :[Pyh { $ {ar ' 8 r y,. .r& r "l'- . 1. r' 87. +SM1`.. w{ fs+ •,,a:~"tx "Y Yr .r,'c'k"'k•1 m f-, ikAl 'r~'- ,jj J` S yy ~r~h,r^ It <,a: 'ar•5,°,' ,}.r`°r a a~.~ _ t,.'c , A nkrXV h J'- 1, ~{.t t h 4 tAT s q . F, t e.$A y ' .+E. y~ " ' k .k v~'t 1 ,'t . C'•ar '4 ^~,ih.ia.,,fi ~:,fdC`' r.1B' <'Sr , W, v vd.. Jea71:.e y, ,:#,.a r.: Fv I~rn Gx:" .r 6. .'h i. ,~4".'a''"`e i., •s iu`F f. 11` f.~,:t-0' ~,a,F.JA,Fp~ir~r.,, - k`+ , .a;" w>4'•A. ,°¢t „fa., 'sy" a. ya•. "n'., a "•ir~ ; +-l~, ua $a ,.,,-It a _?'S<..-'; ."`a.rv <t ~ ,r ' .r• F n a~rf" , cv,. t. T"'~h~r' , u ~s. -,t~ t~:~ ~~;.n .;;>e ~ ,s~, , w , -Y ~ s>, M rw ~~..,.Ti,•'.a'•w s'.i,:rn :.F~V: °a'.¢°x. Ps,, #,$st `t.'*,,~} e,S .c,err ,_G,~ ..41K'*:r?„ i„" • ,x, ~e ww. w ~ a. ~.t~ r,. ,o~ 1 .-rY „ , !f6+ . , . ~ , c.... ,a . .t. s .,l.•x,-.1, , w _.k , :x.+F t'.,rr31' -xy Pk'- u u-S h '4f~ ,7'0 . nxk"-a J <r',+s ~ , n 5`-., A -,N, .6a l • , s >6 ?k "v';. ~ .r:,fl^y v r . "1`. C r~ 4'A'~ , e . • ,E,_ 4,,{+ 'r d,•* ::r 1h f w 1' « c r a t w,. . ,y ~ ,i F, ° F «:iy - , :,,I •x „&v v:ja, ty: `e1~t.."" ,.,h< t;~'r'z>'"='~m"r' t1k' ~I x yJt. r:.~ a <a ,aa,?r N.,,e:,, ,-r . .r"',+ ..s". ,•,y,,., ;wP;" °ka ak f:,t , t-.+4 "c't' t ~ w , _ r'I,r'+.;t. t,,. , t , w.i'~ . 2.. . '.X, "a.- ; e ,~'xr~ 9o-.4 ' ~ca. s 3,:, .,5; x~„ -,i, ~ y., m., a ;.az„• .w<.:s f - , 'box r ~S, , t r ?{'9'' t,':tf v .rY,: !.Y : y •'i'e.•lt vd ~,F`SF,i.- Sim +k:'t ti"„" ~~i PIN ''L~n,1'r`, 'N 1 .`r'° r,n : - ,~r'r°, 7a t--~ t%., r•,.Y, a v-,. a^3 .r ',~'tf "-'#ua+,".. , ,-t,-, - x ,ds .ca,.. s,. d''a'r'hL ~~,',,.t~,r°,. r,F...'s,.r., ,r,~.,~r ♦t7;, `a `:'v~'.'t~*'rt~,,-'r~, to ,3 '4` . ?t„.1 n,>+s.,, x . x-u,? ^:"k,:.:>~., ,,"'r .,?tuu . nx t.x- ',:a. a . x9 k,. : "+d` ?"r,p a,,. ~ r"-.k,d,„v ir; ,b .-#„,t ,,e,51 S>t• .r . t;".' F2 A'- ;'hr ',.~t, lt, t'L~, -.t t, m'# K~'.'"rSn s x' ;3G:,,, k~' n4^te, u ':s .sar '.F r'.:,a aar rte, ,.-~'.°'ti,t.r ,»•~'',.,.a•~,,,^~:, s~£r.,:,~,"=k"~ ~~'sx. .~a .:~,:Jk y ..:~C.^ta..," -bra,, .r.•w ,";4'a ak; r';:V ^`'a"b. ar.4'" <•i ,.¢,:,o- .r- ~,x ~,r "i„rd ,rT;c^ •Frkf„ 'ir. ~nr, 1. x "t,x"x ,9SS;.. 6'>x.."wM,«~ g"•^.".'`-°i.^' s e. ..f., ~,ikcr., € a f „r',* : a •.`a.` " ,t -w,^! ' ,v =i ' tt a m e> v , ,.u",. s`:'i K k.> ,a •t~. .,rr `V, •,£,at~,~,"cn"'~`r< ~l'* r+, ,z ,-l•;"l- .td +,v t .wW`a}`z r'•a~,. C. 4. tx%n ,:T-•;•, ~.~nh,,r{• : <c'~aY N. , <.t4.,". 3 +r r R , t~w, fi • .a i (pr': - ~t~ . •m aT'F. , z . wr 3'•e " a'S :>N• xF ,y, 1a• ta;.. 9.. :'a•'-'.:s ~a.n '?xi, n:fi h'^r'2 .F,^'!` r«r• ~c't, rH~'~'~w .a k -x~ r I, rQt, '~s,aw~m,+.~ .r;'a'4?, ~ r 4 ~-•iSC: Ma 'ri".,, ~,.=c. c ..+JU, mF . nv'~ L. ~•1a't+ i F ~ 't:, F u1 .E fl"+~~.. 3 t .r:• r%»,i.tz` ~,t. ,la. l,lm. a: ~.s ~a-^~ r, r,t - '\*,~r~'.. , e _ •6r a[>".,;; G wt: ,a,• r at : a„e, t , .,'y'.w, w :,~"ti''., c ~ ' i° . c„r J w -n9. ~#~r. m! »Y;. u4an i'±.> ,~u is - f . 4„ •s"- 3. ~ i'."~ 4 ~ :7 sd,, •E' .~+.5- r~~ °:~~z„ .as~~,v ~ ~s ~ ~ ~.ks ~±,<a;:'" f N~. 9 -F "~f.,. :'r,t.,!: ":7. •s ,.kr * a• • .ta ,,,c_, i„is•^e v., r:7- zr. 'Ua, -ti,~ L ° d a ;x a ' <^'i"`r , r7d' ,e~ .a, . >w",i?•• Kr,«. ~,.J, 4, -Y:. .rs_,, s , ~,t':'~..,'t , v' r i"" ' r•~...~... 1f.: rM" , #.;a, "2., .w „s , : ..,zwu'- ,.S ..;~,a~~ IZr.,., ` '~::l,~.n;~,r•,.:»' ~rs" , : _ t:- n. ,>',,'t-;.,;~~ .:a~. . ,.s:'',...,... , _ :;a',>,;;:?,.r.E. ~ ..a.,.........<I~ 5,~'-.,.,,s,.'?r«~ .~;91rs, I,,Y....., ±~,~ir., ,"r. r- , ,'r 31~R, ,1*.• - d~ 'M r 7 t ~F - - < ~ rz { fe t x , , N . - ti x",f- x f ,,yo- J - - - - ti y, -x } ram„ .ri z ,x, " - - - - , i - _ - eS f - ~ GIs 3 K _ • -a t,.'~ -~+.,...,s.....~..- ,wSi..s w~; - - .-.W._.._,,.. - 'c "Ite r Vas - - f-(,t,tJ(IC c.W.u-lrtv.. r 6 7 "f fps--F"`~` 'MR 7~ J x , ' { Chapter 18.411 INTERPRETATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS , , -1, 1v,,M .1 - It - Section 18.411.015 Calculating Minimum and Maximum Densities E -x to - t , { f~- t~ a r , W' r A. For all urban zoning districts with minimum densities except R1-5. R1-6. R1-7.5. Rl- ':h~~~ } " , 10 and R1-20. d o---- _ w Ala" x a • .a erg„ r 1. Minimum density or floor area ratio will be based on the developable area ofr the lot that remains after subtracting: A,F~"~Vfi ~ ` " y A. land dedicated for public roads, public parks and trails, re aired . ' , landscaping and drainage ways. R , , b. land designated by covenant or public dedication to be permanently i E ;~~,XE maintained in an undeveloped state because the land is identified as sensitive t' z" j'~ f due to the presence of steep slopes, unstable land, historical or archaeological p - , sites, wetlands and buffers, or other permanent physical development ~ Y ~ limitations as may be determined epgfeve$by the Planning Director. All - ` N ~ ° > other lands shall be considered in the calculation of minimum density or floor r~~ area ratio including required setbacks, private recreation or common areas. - ~ k * $i a ~w 11 ~ F, r t I 2. Regarding "Maximum density or floor area ratio shall be s calculate d,-° apg'ricaa~L c° ..e thave .s fe o n a based urn f b¢ en the gross area of the site, excluding public right-of-way. q s v k k h-1 s . qua ,2, , t~ areas, to these that efe buildable r . that fesuldBg lets afe at least 90% ` , , ~ - §M,< I r B. Maximum Residential Density in the RI-5. RI-6 RI-7.5. R1-10 and R1-20 zoning r F districts. } MS ` ~ x 1 Purpose To achieve the densityyoals of the Comprehensive Plan with respect to < ~ ~y e - t a the urban area. while reserving environmentally sensitive lands and the livability of the single family residential neighborhoods while also maintaining compatibility with existing , r s residences. *R`s t ~ , a A ).t tl y. ..~3 d _ T st a -r - tlY' ++r) CCC 18 .411.015 ,x„ - T -a r,R, vim. •i s~ - w Page 1 ! i der}wr t `i a v t 7S. 3. inn' y 1 ,i [S{[.' 1 r {.ro "V [ t tit} "r'1 3 " - v I'' . T„. . ,r-"a ~-,w ii F 1f - R 'fat `a l Y L " , , ; ~ ~ ~ -t lr-~~`. , , ',5. V,j,%,,%- E, ,7 } k r - S~- s ~g a 1 « ~ 'A ~6W# r'xS _ ! tK 'SSA- ` L J i- } 1{ G 1 -1 ~ 'r',' :-"I". r' " I It, ~ , ;,"111", , I - , I ~ I . - ~ . qM ~ - , ,~~q - -T - . I II -I 41•"" n'1'Y'es~. i-r_-t.-.ate.-TS3~+-w~. ,w'- .-......+..r~v.n'.s.r. .i r: y r. - _ _ ...~._:..L:- ....,._u_-_, --l- _a... _~_...~~_~~_r .u. u .-,__.r_ ..l:- 2,x.I_._ t _ .,.<.cT r_.- t'-,- -,~,~-r- - - , ~ -;Z~ , , - -L -'t.,; - - - I ~ - L'L- - ~ a~~- -n ! - ~ ~ - ~ - - - . --l- , ~ - - - -Z~1~ -~-L -~~--,MjL - - I- - I ~z "I _1;1,t'1;._2 ~ _ _-_._:._'.-4_fi .i..._._ _ ...~.~._S^r_._,.3 . --r~i~ Y- Y - _ - 3 _ . - i , ~ Fso !-,'~~Y',,,~,,,;~~?c,,,,~,-.-~~-,,~~".--~',.~t,',-~ - , , , - - , 1. : ~ : 7 ~ ` -f_-~~ , , ,4rl- , _ 4 - - - f i s ~r , € i% ;P ~S r E 1 pr ~✓4tssa°....r-y........ ~w~~rm.-.el.zw..~..gas't.• ...,w:tiaw'F'ram,.¢>,::e+•.»..-_._w_._.._:__ - - - - ~ fir- 1 ` ll~ # t x srr r rl a 1 _ its g Z , C L, ;,-,--,---,W 6 ` ~ ^ 2 Density Transfer: The density for property developed in single family zone r A q , - districts. if encumbered by land ideritified as sensitive due to the presence of steep slopes, -111w- , unstable land historical or archeological sites, wetlands Wd buffers, or other permanent 'n. u= ` _ physical development limitations as may be determined "ff2y@A by the Planning Director or ' • land voluntarily set aside for open space or commons as approved by the Planning Director, F " IIX ~ from the gross acreage may be transferred to the remaining unencumbered land areas on the r x same development site subject to the following limitations: i . t xg A. Maximum number. The maximum number of units which can be transferred is limited to the number of whole units (fractions of units yt s - , shall be rounded down) which would have been allowed on the s#~ u unbuildable area if not for the above encumbrances: PROVIDED. ` 'f ,rr-,,y however the maximum number of units shall be calculated based on y ` { the gross area of the site minus anv public road right-of-wav and the - , maximum densitv allowed will be dependent upon site characteristic x RP ° i a.~ Th~Gy T rY-z F and other factors. ~ 5 s s cW ti B. The minimum lot depth of any lot abutting environmentally sensitive i ~4 - f lands shall be 55 feet. ; , 4 5r n 4~ r , g'Ytr§rK' $ C. For parent parcels larger than 2.5 acres: 1F 11," L The resulting lots which abut property zoned for single r family residential shall: I ~..,F,;.~.=fin, f = l~~ , f % A+ J a. Be at least 90% of the minimum lot area standard P for the respective single-family zone district. I- b. Have a lot depth of not less than 80% of the , e t minimum lot depth of the respective zoning z'- - s district. 't4~~4, ' c. Have a minimum lot width not less than 10 feet y ` ;v- y %U from the minimum lot width of the respective i* $ , ~ r Er.,, a , s` zoning district.? 4q, & C 2. The resulting lots which are interior (not a pan of the 4 ~ t parent parcel abutting an adjacent propenv line) to the " ~ t site shall conform to the lot requirements set out in tab]e {yy r a 18.411.015-A = ; ~rJ r 4 0. , n D. For parent parcels 2.5 acres or less. the lots to be created shall k 4 ~3 - `N conform to the lot requirements in Table 18.411.015-A.r ; Y ,..;`'aa, f ' 1 e ' t - E'r 'f - + r ° - i~ 'i S } LM' Y CCC 18.411.015 Page 2 -xx lr . y A tV f _ y3 - Y- , - x 3.r - y . ! AI ` t r S- t-~- w y; kk[E 'j 1 s., - , Via' s~~°""' ..C, x v - °^e..,^• a .fat s r l'f 'Y, -1 4 l . f - i - - t ~ S < 4 ~ a m -yam. f x 1 ' 1. - - - - 2 .S - f. F fir'' 3- - - J- 4' k~ t 6 J~x r - f - ~ f S" 5 1 C~k Y. r } - - r r r, _ _ f ' r .s d e r , r 6 1 , I 1. I'~ ~ , ~l I ~ 1, ~71 ~ ~ ~m : I , I I - _ _ .x.. _ __~r. «~.........:ti"'_ s .nr.., 1 ..I __.w. . ; lrj . ~ e =mot R ,V fir" ~z' e x ° - t - q@3 .•~W~ H`3P^.~ tk+"'" ' t T. - t - , F - - T f - S' Z~ - i?, 5 . - -$rs - sr .sx i 4~^ r fik t - t s o - ,y- t '.s - tF cY, x, s _ - r .€'Y`~f ri 'rte.-, , e+-t,4• - , - , ~ , - - T V~*6. "O - -3 -mot c ~ ~ I .t MIM 751 -W ~,l t ~ a 1 This Density Transfer Development provision may not be used in ri ? k I - 1-1 11 rr association with, the provisions of Chapter 18.405. Planned Unit r m,; ry $v , - Developinents or 18.406.020.0.: In-Fill. • . g z s W , ' s< "w = a - "Ill - ~ F. A recorded covenant•shall be place on those areas or tracts from which ~x 1 - a y ~ ` Z7, - density is transferred prohibiting ja development of rhr. parcel or tract z- a-~~ ff - - 1 ~ 4n L inconsistent with its intended use. - . t°¢~~, f i .TABLE 18.411.015 - A~ s,~ ± E ~ s k S. _ t _ _ _ _ • Useable Avg .Avg. x A ^r ..e*" R ~.o-ps 4 -t a Lo[ Lot - Lot Lot V11 - Classi- Density Areal Width Depths € a fcation (d.u./acre) _f Z feet feet ' A , i - t _ RI-5 6 2.250 35 50 ~ ) L-A "'4 _ R1-6-6 5.8 2.500 40 50 - ~ - u a R1-7.5 4.6 3.000 50 50 - Rl-SO 3.5 4.000 70 50 . t~- r- a R1-20 -1_7 4.500 90 50 - - b fi 7. ~~4 ] The maximum density listed is for the purpose of calculating maximum densities to be k transferred.and is only provided for that area from which the density is beine transferred R The maximum densities listed are based upon dividing gross acres by the minimum lot size in Ai4 ~ j, t y - the zone and minus 20% which would normally be devoted to public road right-of-way in a , ~.1 6 ,f Im , ?7"W, , ' _ typrcal subdivision. 3 - ,j 11 t r } Z. 'Minimum useable area is that portion of the lot which is unencumbered by the land ' Z t r voluntarily set aside. environmentally sensitive lands to be protected and their respective a E } buffers, and shall exclude yard setbacks and easements rExample• A typical 5,000 sauare Cu - - foot lot would have 3,000 s.f. of usable area even if unencumbered by environmentally , jk.`~~ sensitive lands.l . . . I, r - *I, ~i ~ , F E 'May be reduced subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.411 and the variance procedures g#3 & %x , J u- 'The minimum street side yard shall be ten (10) feet t 4 V , . , ,t'A' " ~ , - ,)K 5S-,4 71"g,~-~~-,&",'~r~ [1-- -S„ . S1, ) Ix, i t ~a 1 x rZ F CCC 18 .411. 015 , '41 ~ IV - , 7 x Page 3 r 1111 ~xK'- , YEA- i:7 hp,-aA ~ _t,q ' rx ' 5 a - Slia x'azy_z3.-rig` 'z*` 1. f _ I i _ Y -x F.-,s. r-.r.', 5 z c- r "1 r.- d-ra ssE ~ ~ii~, 'Wf i"-."Z;~,,V.,",~~L,~,~'i~'~~[~k,,,~,-.-~ -z - 1-~-z . ,,,_,,r,,,,;. 1. , ~ - . , I ~ } Nr f }C -F a 1 t - r 3 Mr ss"„11'r`4 r - t _ S,t_ w,-'~ ice. G ~i 'I 1, k a i• L `r a _ -t _ r _ f „ . f r Ora a - - - - - - - I M % i t ~i - s - f x t - Ja ViR INS! 'N W~ via 41_£ ww - noun lot AM=- z xl~ , z441 7t Ykk' Y # } , - - d _ f t 3 } f t'YT~ ' 43i m VI~k, 3 ~,£..A+.~V ' 3n+1-, >'E;., $ cap c a - - s Org 2, U Ilk v ax~"2, ,vkt z i z v t~ '.,~r. .msg. Rte, t i, MEN, K ram" ~..-..,..y..~,....-__~._ - - ti±s ~d -•g m, r .VI F i ~ 'i : I n s ONIQ definition: Open Space /Commons shall mean an area left open and undeveloped for use Wx,Mv x W ? by Me pubUc but is not a formal park or recreation area managed or owned by the County. - y 4. The land shall be identified as a separate tract and shall be managed and maintained in "?'~E s d emetuity for the intended use of the homeowners of the relevant development ~t xx r $ ' !iY try. ~~h .-r r z. ~'9 ~ws~y Y k ~`s } c hAbpc\code\densiry.cd3 P'"+'" - ' 'a' _ - tea`- sc•»'~€.. ` x v4~+- s sr a F'r= .3S - - t' F' y Pytkd_'C`^ S ~s, Fe m dam'-x"J tj£d - `fi tit a+'~>CT'#'f3~+ § 777 zY rnc-- S v~ lit-, 2 4 S fii .wry r ~ i piss s ~ f - p yY 5 `{?M~}y~Yr.:a~'}~ ty~k ~ ' I '}*~`f r ? ZOOM i c CCC 18 .411. 015v ~w x 1 Page 4`~-W~ 1 t; 3 `5,,4?x-..,1~~•' ~g fir' .:s,.,^•is:. 016 x~wr rah x~ >s' _N. } OR"A 'jZ t 77"'7-4 RUW, y F.t x yyU r"* „ { y r r r,Y - r s t.it ,x{3-3, ' E^q ` 14 M- t r•4r, b ; IN ti' u J ,k3 •"*C•'xt VIN k~ ~ , VliplF v o- r c r r, t -f .r- - 93 } t - r y ``F a lz ~ *YfR - "F' 5't-- - '2 z N r - _ _ .i - _ r.r _ ~Pr ~stt.-r~st~'~„~r r .;;tJ .t"r"'. rr ✓ Fr -ma 1~s-'s"'s A r x?. ~'!rra- + r~ a~° i -ps w ~.,fi .d ✓ 1,. t'~ 5 h 1 Y L _ k' 'id, - ,~y,,•f t i~ k 21 r+~v~ z yr 5 f " x F v" a ,t".es "-~.S_ ar}sys• r. t WO-W 3 ft Y aL` }d J S t3 •.d f ink&# - AT • yy~~rr _ -x F _ - < - .3- x mart ° a~ 4 _ 6 t'aw' `x. J'• - - i cz _ cwt, 4 y U, `v<d, "u ,4h.d.t .~''y i - - -i tyr_ *t'-•+'G-_ f (~~~^ct it-> 3 sa za v' - _ c.~sc.^ :~",s~..u.:.:.: F rr3.`-.a'T ,..,...a._ r~ - y r - ;.8_ r + "LT 4 fi t jlr.amsssr~...5 ;r3Fd2. a"{+, - 6 - T t s' AGENDA ITEM # s, 3, 3 ' ~ 4,-' \ 4 v x { w u ~ . For Agenda of 6111 410 v 11 r W r "y - llt. c - 1,11 _ U CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON x ~ i~n 4 t . 1 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ¢ t ~ j ~ - n P e.,,P nr r7nA 96-00031 Impact Stud Requirements i s r ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Zone > a -t*.Y~-qx h , - ` F:.uLL PREPARED BY: Dick B DEPT HEAD OK All r"' 'CITY ADMIN OIL j'~~` v - ` ,I ~c . _ k ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL w O I a.~ ~ ' Should the City Council approve amendments to the Development Code pertaining to dedication and impact study f, ' ~ s a+ + ~ requirements to address "rough ro ortionali , - - S ` I 1. ' ? P P tY"• t ~ &IeA ~ ~ ? x E A L &I STAFF RECOMMENDATION - ,1~` ; Z1 r , s r It is recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed amendments as shown as Exhibit "A" to the attached r' , , ' r e 3 ordinance. This exhibit eliminates reservation area requirements. 11 1 - E ` Y j INFORMATION SUMMARY , ' r' To address the results of the United States Supreme Court case Dolan v. City of Tigard, the City Attorney's office r ! drafted develo ment code amendments. The ro osed amendments re uire that an impact stud tx~ t P P P q Y quantify the Mt effect of each develo ment on ublic facilities and services. After ublic hearin s b both the I amun I f s p P P g y g 11 g-r 3- Commission and City Council, the City Council directed staff to eliminate language related to park and greenway , se~f~ , ~ x t r eservation and setbacks. The attached ordinance follows that directive. { z , ` r s' The Council should complete the public hearing and then take action of the proposed ordinance. . 4 , 11. `MW V - a ~ } J ` OTHER ALTERNATIVES ONSID FD - ~ -S 1. Leave the development code as is. ~ 11 1s, ~ T - tk - Z. Modify the proposed language. *r i s , c P'- - 3. Add language to permit reservation and setbacks from floodplains, greenways, etc, yk2 ~ ¢ FISCAL NOTF~ j1-1. ~ VIJ ~ e f - Not applicable ,gig _ ;M°xMM--,'-A`A "'a ft _ r s ~ kzTi^ irs T -4 yp - i y ' < '9.u.u°wl actL`j.3 kn>E ~r - ( , ITS rv F ,1z" &I.}«.~ J7`F t # } ¢ i - r .F.- F 'mss-, s F ca' ~5-.t'S 3' J Pl n' , '1 .a., QA T.y - -r - t 5 :,'X" .-'wi,- f=f ,m,. ~"wYtx !a^+^""""^°T 'E ,~rv a ti .1 - S Y k=Y. - _ _ - _ ' i+ri R 1 - 1 s ~'Ya JY L # x - y i 4 x * - ( _ _ i -sir I _ " . , 1~~ , , , 2 ~3'~*' 5 _-r'r _ - i - s - ya.rk pia - x r- r v s -s_ ul - S < 1 t4 yf.1 s f vl-'» - ; ~ 9 om } t v ~ adz f µj' } 9 ! - - - - t - t u,: 4~- ~dt t y* i 7 - i I . ~ , ~ ; - ' - n ~11 ` " - , A' r`' s t, .-~L' qty _.,-,ILA4L,~t-_ - 1 _ tY~t